1 Yale Center for British Art and British Studies This book was digitized by Microsoft Corporation in cooperation with Yale University Library, 2008. You may not reproduce this digitized copy of the book for any purpose other than for scholarship, research, educational, or, in limited quantity, personal use. You may not distribute or provide access to this digitized copy (or modified or partial versions of it) for commercial purposes. MEMORIALS SIR FRANCIS CHANTREY, R.A. SCULPTOK, IN HALLAMSHIRE AND ELSEWHERE. Cottage in which Chantrey was Born. BY JOHN HOLLAND. SHEFFIELD : J. PEABOE, JUN., TIMES OFFICE, HIGH-STREET. £55*57 /Us (Le) PEEFACE. The following Reminiscences of an individual whose well- earned celebrity is, in various ways, identified with the town and neighbourhood of Sheffield, including especially the adjacent village of Norton, are published with unaffected diffidence, as to their particular interest and value, though without any misgiving on the ground of their general truthfulness. Their appearance at this particular moment is mainly clue to a perusal of "Recol lections of Sir Francis Chantrey," by George Jones, R.A., a work which, however acceptable in some respects, shows how many original mistakes, in relation to its subject, are passing from periodical to permanent publications, and thus suggesting to the present writer the propriety of at once giving to his own notes some form less restricted and fugitive than that of MS. memoranda. He was the more inclined to this course, inasmuch as the matterwhich he had collected was wholly distinct from that which forms the staple of Mr. Jones's book — three of the following sections, relating chiefly to periods in the life of Chantrey pre ceding, and the greater portion of the others to that subsequent to the term formally comprised in the "Recollections." Of course, neither separately, nor together, have these Collections any claim to be considered as — nor will they, it is hoped, be allowed long to stand in the place of — a regular "Life" of the great English Sculptor; while, for such a work, whenever or by whomsoever worthily undertaken, even these pages may yield some hint, or afford some clue of value to a competent biographer. Less doubtful about the propriety of preserving, in some way, memorials of the early life of so distinguished an individual as the late Sir Francis Chantrey, than confident as to the best mode of doing so, some apology is felt to be necessary for the style — if not for the substance — of this volume. In the first place, it may be alleged, that many matters absolutely or comparatively A 2 trivial are noted ; and, secondly, that the writer, instead of con tenting himself with the simple record of a fact as such, has not seldom associated it with some remark or allusion of remote, if not doubtful relevancy. For the first point, the interest of local association at least may fairly he pleaded — a paragraph of domes tic intelligence is often read with deep interest in a Sheffield newspaper, that would be quite out of place in a London journal — much more in a History of England. For the second matter — that of diffusiveness, or sentimentality — let the privilege of the Poet be conceded to the Memorialist, who felt, even when his task appeared little else than making a catalogue of pictures, busts, or statues, that perhaps a time might come when identification, if not value, would depend upon a few characteristic words written while evidence was fresh. If this may be said to be anticipating an after-interest in objects, the present estimate of which Time will probably rather lessen than enhance — be it so : one fact is certain — whatever place the works of Chantrey, the British Sculptor, may ultimately occupy in the History of Art, the memory of Chantrey — the munificent patron of the Royal Academy, the grateful and graceful Norton benefactor — will be perennial through living generations. The foregoing sentences were written some months ago, when this work was first placed in the hands of the printer ; hut while the writer is conscious that he must lose something of whatever forbearance the public might have readily accorded to a fresh and seasonable contribution to the interest excited at that time by the book above-mentioned, he is grateful that such unanticipated delay has enabled him to render the following pages less imper fect than otherwise they might have been. Instances in which obligation has been created by the kind co-operation of friendly individuals will, each in its proper place, be specially, as they are here in general terms, very gratefully acknowledged. Sheffield, May 1, 1801. CHANTEEY IN HALLAMSHIEE, &c. six parts. I. The Boyhood of Genius 1 54 II. Chantrey as a Portrait Painter 55-129 III. Pen and Pencil Sketches ... ]30 177 IV. The Sculptor in Sheffield ... 178 - 239 V. London Life and Works 240 304 VI. Mortuary Memorials 305 364 Hallamshire is a district, of which the ancient limits have been variously defined, but of which Sheffield is the modern capital. In its widest early meaning, it comprehended what are now the separate parishes of Sheffield, Ecclesfield, and Hands- worth; and as a territory over which the jurisdiction of the " Company of Cutlers" extended by Act of James I., a still wider additional outline of " six miles compass" was assigned to it. The history of the infeudation and early government, as well as of the ecclesiastical, social, and commercial vicissitudes of this interesting and important locality, by the Rev. Joseph Hunter, is one of the most elegant and instructive topographical works in the language. Say, what is Genius ? — that mysterious power, The secret birth- right of few marvellous minds! One man, in Nature's every aspect, finds — Or calm, or storm, mist, sunshine, cloud, or shower, Communion with the elements : the dower Of some — that rarer faculty, which gives Birth to ideal beauty, such as lives In picture, song, or marble : in an hour, — Perchance a moment, — springs to active life, That deep, creative energy of soul, Beyond all vulgar commerce or control, Which finds no sympathy in sordid strife : Art, taste, and skill, — each in its highest state, Obedient menials, all on heaven-born genius wait. PART I THE BOYHOOD OF GENIUS. " I found Chantrey fond of talking of the humbleness of his own origin : the feeling that he toot from it was one of pride, and not of shame : he felt what he was, and was proud of accompanying it with what he had been." — Sir Henry Russell. Chantrey — a surname which has conferred lasting celebrity on the village of Norton, was undistinguished during the eighteenth century, even in that locality, amidst the mass of common appellatives borne by the rest of the rustic families of the parish. And whence did it originate ? a question often asked, — and repeated here, not as the prelude to a learned answer, but, for the B 2 name of chantrey. purpose of mentioning a fanciful notion once entertained of some connection between the ances tors of the late eminent sculptor, and the existence of an ancient Chantry in tbeir parish church. In the building just named, still exist the tomb and effigies, in alabaster, of William Blythe and his wife, of Norton Lees, the parents of two bishops who, towards the end of the fifteenth century, evinced their filial piety by the establishment of a service of perpetual orisons for the souls of their ancestors. The song for the dead ceased, on the abolition of all such offices, i. Edw. VI., but the ruins of the house formerly occupied by the officiating priest, existed under the appellation of The Ghantry, adjacent to Norton Hall, almost to the time when sufficient interest began tb attach to the name of Francis Chantrey, to lead persons to seek in merely synonymous sounds, something more than a mere accidental resemblance. It would be disingenuous on my part, not to confess its supposed origin. 3 a sympathy with the popular desire thus to add the interest of old historic association to the local repute of a name so eminently distinguished : and could it be shewn that any family bore that name in this pleasant northern nook of the county of Derby, — immediately after the Eeformation, the fanciful claim thus set up for the memory of the old Canteria might, perhaps, have passed un challenged. I am not about to exhibit, at length, the genealogy of Chantrey — for Genius, whatever its origin, in this instance at least, was not here ditary — but it may be interesting to mention that, although I have not noticed any trace of the name in the parish of Norton, at an earlier period than about the middle of the eighteenth century, the family appears to have been long identified with other places in North Derbyshire. In the parish of Staveley, there was residing " George Ohauntry," who died before 38 Elizabeth, leaving a widow, b 2 4 REV. GEORGE CHANTRY. who had been " Grace Lyllie :" she was dead in 1631, her son and heir being "Thomas Ohauntry," who was living in 1634. These are, as we shall presently see, family names, as well as the follow ing, viz. : — " Francis Chantrye," who was dead in 1661, leaving a son and heir of the same name, who was alive in 1 701. I take the latter to be the "Francis Ohauntry" who, along with "Godfrey Ohauntry," is rated under the " Unston Quarter," in an assessment for the parish of Dronfield, collected 1667. He was probably the father of the Eev. George Chantry, who was rector of Clown, in Derbyshire, from the beginning of June, 1693, to the 6th of November, 1721, when he died, leaving, by will, twenty shillings a-year — chargeable on nine acres of land, at Barlbrough — to be distributed to ten poor persons in the parish of Clown. His wife was Elizabeth, daughter of Phineas Mace, rector of the adjacent parish of Barlbrough — having pre viously, it would seem, been himself " Eectoriffi de ANN CHANTRY. 5 Clowne." They had one child, a daughter Margaret, who died in infancy, October 21, 1701. All three are commemorated on gravestones within the communion rails at Clown. In this church were married, February 16th, 1700-1, Francis Chantry and Ann Cooper, both of the parish of Dronfield. I have very lately had in my hand the little pocket Bible of this worthy woman, containing the follow ing quaint inscription : — " ANN CHANTEY— Her Book. If it be lost, and yon it find, I pray that you will be so kind As to restore it me again, And I'll reward you for your pain." I am informed by my friend, the Eev. W. 0. Whiter, the present incumbent of Clown, that the foregoing comprise all the instances of the occur rence of this name in the register, or in the parish, and I believe, I may add, in the county of Derby. 6 CHANTREY OF NORTON. It was not, however, the individual above-named, but his cousin, Francis Ohauntry, of Handsworth Woodhouse, who, on the 13th January, 1700, was married at Dronfield, to Sarah Mower, of Holmes- field, and went to live at High-gate House, who was the father of Francis Chantrey, (as the name is spelled,) joiner, who, with Mary his wife, were living at Backmoor in 1736, in which year their first child was born ; they then removed to Sheephill,* where their second child was born ; and, lastly, to Jor- danthorpe, where they had two other children, including the father of the sculptor. The following is a brief tabular view of the descent of Chantrey of Jordanthorpe, in the parish of Norton — a spot which has to me the additional interest of having been the residence of my own paternal ancestors, about the Elizabethan era : — Adjacent places, on a bleak eminence near the village of Norton, on the north side. RESIDENTS AT JORDANTHORPE. Francis Chantrey, Died at Jordanthorpe, Oct. 25, 1766, set. 56. Mary, Died April 6th, 1770, set. 63. Anne, Died unmarried, July 19, 1767, Aged 29. I George, Died unmarried, July 28, 1776, Aged 35. Sarah, Died unmarried, Jan. 5, 1779, Aged 35. Francis, Died at Jordanthorpe, March 21, 1793, Aged 45. = Sarah, Daughter of Martin Leggitt, Of Okeover, In the County of Stafford, Died Oct. 29, 1826, aged 81. I Francis Chantrey == Mary Ann, The Sculptor, Born April 7, 1781, Died Nov. 25, 1841. I Thomas, Daughter of Danl. Died in Wale, Esq. Childhood. Born Ap. 9, 1787. Sine Prole. Most of the writers of Memoirs of the late Sir Francis Chantrey have sought to convey the notion that he narrowly missed some valuable family patrimony. Mr. Ehodes says — "His ancestors were in respectable but not opulent circumstances, 8 FAMILY possessions. and some heritable possessions still belong to the family. His father was involved in considerable pecuniary losses, chiefly by the conduct of a brother, whom he endeavoured to serve beyond the extent of his means. He saw the property which his forefathers had accumulated, progressively departing from him, his spirits became depressed, and be died in the prime of life." In the humblest yeoman family there usually floats some tradition, more or less vague, of the loss of heritable property, which the poor labourer or small copyholder would have enjoyed, "had right things gone forward." Some reckless ancestor squandered the freehold; some unprincipled cadet of the family supplanted the right heir in the patrimonial birthright; or some improvident uncle disappointed the hopes of a whole generation of expectants. Well or ill founded, these traditions are almost sure to form a sort of " peerage question," whenever a cottager's son happens to rise to extraordinary eminence in FREEHOLD PROPERTY. 9 one of the learned professions, or in any way acquires sufficient importance to become known at the Herald's College — then it is they gild the old adage — " When Land is gone, and Money spent, Then Learning is most excellent." Thus, the fame and wealth so honourably won by Sir Francis Chantrey, have led his biographers to embody vague phantoms of hereditary mischance in their notices of his early life. Some property, however, there was in the family, for I have before me an abstract of the will of the first Norton Chantrey — whether it was executed or not, I cannot say — in which he first leaves to his widow during her life, and then, to his son George, two freehold closes of nine acres at Barlbrough; and to his son Francis, " all that copyhold estate in the parish of Bradfield," charging the latter with the payment of twenty pounds to his said son George, and 1 0 chantrey's grandfather. ninety-five pounds each to his daughters Sarah and Ann Chantrey. These are, no doubt, the heredita ments alluded to by Mr. Ehodes, and to which probably the testator above-named, was heir- apparent; but it seems, after all, so doubtful whether he ever actually entered into possession, that I have sometimes thought neither the father or grandfather of Chantrey ever de facto possessed a foot of freehold, or lost a foot of leasehold property during their lives : the Sculptor himself afterwards acquired both sorts, through bequests of Eaworth and Cooper, to whom his family were related through marriage. Chantrey's grandfather, of both his names, lived, as we have seen, on the farm at Jordan thorpe, as tenant to the Offleys of Norton; and there he died, Oct. 25, 1766, at the age of 56. Concerning him even local tradition is silent : nor have I been able to learn where he came from, or who he married. His "great chair'' — if we may MARRIAGE OF CHANTEEY's FATHER. 1 1 trust the catalogue — was one of the curiosities in an exhibition held in the Music Hall, Sheffield, 1840, for the " Mechanics' Institution," on which occasion it so happened, that Sir Francis himself complimented the managers by a visit to the rooms. In the cultivation of the farm at Jordanthorpe, consisting of forty-five acres, the first Norton Chantrey was succeeded by his son Francis, who was also brought up a carpenter, his workshop in later years being the old priest's house in the " Chantry Croft," whence probably arose the specu lations on the local origin of the family name. He married, in 1780, Sarah, one of the four daughters of Martin Leggitt, of Okeover, Stafford shire, a man of some property, who died in the house of his son-in-law, and lies buried in Norton Church-yard. She had been living as house keeper, with Eobert Newton, Esq., of Norton House, the gentleman who figures so conspicuously and benevolently in Mr. Ward's "owre true" tale c 2 12 HIS CHARACTER. of St. Lawrence, in his work entitled "Human Life." His brother George, described as a maker of " sheep -shears," was, I suspect, the person pre viously alluded to, as having impoverished the family. There is an elder personage of the name who has a traditionary celebrity of another kind : he was huntsman to the Offleys, and, as I learn from a note in the handwriting of the late Samuel Shore, Esq., their representative, was remarkable for the sten torian power of his voice — being able, it is said, to make himself heard from Norton Hall to Coal- Aston, a distance of a mile at least !* Francis — father of the Sculptor, upon whose " depression of * There is still (May, 1850) in Norton Hall, a full-length portrait of this stalwart retainer ; he is good-looking, with black bushy hair, a large hat, and bands like a clergyman : in one hand he holds a. long staff, and with the other caresses a couple of hounds. Beside him stands a squab, dwarf-looking fellow, with a hare on a stick over his shoulder : he is said to have been a satellite of the huntsman. In the back-ground is a view of old Norton Hall. BIRTH OF THE SCULPTOR. 13 spirits," as arising from the departure of ancestral property, so much stress has been laid, is described to me in very different terms by several persons who knew him well. He was, indeed, regarded as no ordinary man in his own sphere of life. He sung a song, told a tale, or bandied a joke but too cleverly for his own welfare. The public-house was not far off ; and still nearer was the hospitable residence of " Squire Newton," among whose eccen tricities was a too frequent preference of the hilarious frankness of persons in a grade of life below his own, to the. more formal intercourse of the neighbouring gentry. With him " Frank Chantrey" was a great favourite. He died on the 21st March, 1793, at the age of forty-five, leaving a widow and one son, twelve years of age. Francis Chantrey — the third and last of the name at Norton — was born at Jordanthorpe, in the southern precinct of that pleasant village, " on the 7th of April, 1781, about seven in the morning," 14 MISTAKES ABOUT IT. says his mother, in a memorandum before me ; and he was baptized at the Parish Church on the 27th of May following. I am the more careful to record the foregoing dates, extracted by myself from the original entries, because several previous writers, including Mr. Jones, in the " Eecollections" just published, and dedicated to Lady Chantrey, represent Sir Francis to have been born in " 1 782." Indeed, whatever degree of interest may be claimed for the bulk of Mr. Jones's book, the early portion is at once meagre, vague, and erroneous, in a remarkable degree, considering the accessibility of better information. After the mistake about the year of Chantrey's birth, we are told that "his father cultivated a small property of his own" — the fact was, he rented a small farm first under Mr. Offley then under Mr. Shore. It is added — " to his son Francis he wished to give an education suited to his station, and based on the best dictates of common sense." Whatever may be the intended meaning HIS EARLY EDUCATION. 15 of this passage, the actual reality of the case shall presently be stated: meanwhile, it must be re membered, that Chantrey's father did not die when his son "was eight years of age," as Mr. Jones tells us in bis book, but when he was twelve — as appears from the inscriptions on his gravestone, with which Mr. Jones might have been presumed to be familiar. The projects of his parents relative to his tuition are, in fact, too often spoken of in the same misleading phraseology, as the loss of their patrimony. Mr. Ehodes says, truly enough, that "his mother was left in narrow circumstances;" but when he adds, "she yet contrived to bestow upon him as liberal an education as her limited means would admit," — something more than what was participated by most of the children in the village, seems to be implied. The fact is, he learnt his letters at home ; and as much more as a " spoiled child" might be expected to acquire before the age of six, with "Dame Eose:" he was then 16 THE VILLAGE SCHOOL. transferred to " The School," conducted by Thomas Fox. I have seen the register book of this worthy pedagogue, from which it appears that Francis Chantrey began to learn to Read with him, April 16, 1787; to Write, in January, 1788; and Accounts, in October, 1792. After several weekly, and even monthly intervals of non-attendance, during which he was no doubt usefully occupied at home, his place in the list of scholars is, on the 3rd July, 1797, filled up with the name of another boy. The little lane-side school, " rebuilt and enlarged in 1787," as we are informed by a tablet over the door, and to which Chantrey was sent, remains unchanged in its exterior : the writing-desks, made by his father, occupying their wonted places within — and " The bench on which he sat while deep employed, Though mangled, hacked, and hewed, not yet destroyed." His somewhat irregular attendance at the village school, is perfectly compatible with many boyish CHANTREY AS A MILK BOY. 17 employments in the fields or the byre at Jordan thorpe ; and, for awhile, he certainly drove an ass daily, with milk barrels, between Norton and Sheffield. This circumstance in his early history has been made the subject of a sweet little picture by H. P. Parker, coloured prints after which are common in Sheffield, under the title of "Milk Boys." Pretty as the scene looks in the painter's treatment of it — and pleasant as the Norton lanes are in reality, it was well the ingenuous boy was so soon rescued from a calling so very unfavourable to morals, manners, and intelligence. I confess I am somewhat surprised, after Mr. Ehodes's explanation of the mistake has been more than twenty years be fore the public, to find even Mr. Jones reiterating the assertion that, when Chantrey's "profession was de termined by his friends — it was their intention to place him with a lawyer in Sheffield." " This is an error into which his biographers have fallen, in con sequence of the term factor being understood to have 18 DEATH OF HIS FATHER. the same meaning in Sheffield as it has in Scot land, where the memoir of this distinguished artist was first published," instead of its being applied to an inland merchant. " Being an only child," says Mr. Ehodes," he was naturally the object of the tenderest care and most anxious solicitude of his surviving parent, who retained him about her person until he was nearly eighteen years old. He was intended for agricultural pursuits, but his employment in attending to the concerns of the farm, was but little suited to his views and inch- nations." This is not untrue ; but it is not " the whole truth," as regards the cause of his unsettle- ment at home. Francis Chantrey, the carpenter, died, as already mentioned, in 1793, and was buried in Norton Church-yard. He made a will — which, it seems, was never proved — one of the witnesses to which was Job Hall, a man who could not spell his own name ; but who presently became the servant, or HIS MOTHER MARRIES AGAIN. 19 adviser, and subsequently the husband of the widow. This marriage was, at the first, exceedingly distasteful to young Chantrey, not so much on account of anything objectionable in the character of his father-in-law, who was a worthy man, as because he was supplanted on the family hearth stone, in his title to the little homestead, and, presently, put to a new and irksome employment. As some sort of relationship existed between Hall and Ebenezer Birks, at that time a respectable grocer, in Fargate, Sheffield, it was determined to place young Chantrey with the latter, with a design of his apprenticeship. It is believed his mother was led to advise this ungenial experiment from the fact of having herself dabbled a little in the sale of groceries to her neighbours. Thither, accordingly, he went; but a probation of a few weeks behind the counter, in one of the most tasteless and unintellec- tual of all respectable occupations, was more than sufficient to convince the poor lad — and, presently, D 2 20 CHANTREY LEAVES HOME. his friends also— that this, at all events, was a mis taken aim. Nor was he, according to all accounts, slow to put himself right ; for his mother having called to see him, he walked out with her into the town, explained the misery of his present position, and then, taking her to the shop window of Mr. Eamsay, carver and gilder, in High-street, besought of her to get him placed in that establishment : he accordingly left the grocer's service, and the parties thus brought into temporary connection, never met afterwards but once, when Mr. Birks went, in 1806, as many other persons did, to look at Chantrey work on the model of Mr. Wilkinson's bust : the quondam pupil appeared glad to see his old master : I may add, that the latter is still alive. It was now arranged that the youth should go into Bam- say's establishment. This was, apparently, the most important turning point of his history and fortunes. As this period of the Sculptor's history has been APPRENTICED TO RAMSAY. 21 especially obscured by indistinctness and mistakes, I may as well cite, as the best of all evidence, the very terms of the Indenture of Apprenticeship — "made the 19th of September, 1797, between Francis Chantrey, of Norton, in the county of Derby, and Job Hall, of Norton aforesaid, farmer, and Thomas Fox, of Norton aforesaid, schoolmaster, friends of the said Francis Chantrey, of the one part, and Eobert Eamsay, of Sheffield, in the county of York, carver and gilder, of the other part, witnesseth — that the said Francis Chantrey, of his own good liking, and by and with the counsel of his friends, hath put, bound, and by these presents doth put and bind himself servant," &c. I am aware this is the usual legal formula; but the words may be allowed to have had a real significa tion in this particular case. The sum of ten pounds was paid at the binding — which was for seven vears — and breach of covenant, on either side, incurred a penalty of fifty pounds : the signature 22 STREET-WINDOW FIGURES. of the above-named parties, and that of John Eimington, a respectable solicitor, who drew the instrument, being affixed to it. I am assured by Mr. Eadon, carver and gilder, an ingenious and worthy man, to whom I owe other obligations in connection with these pages, that the objects which had more immediately attracted Chantrey's attention to Eamsay's window, were two little figures of Faith and Charity, modelled in wax, by James Taylor, and from which he afterwards carved the two small statues which now stand beside the door of the Sheffield Infirmary. These interesting models still exist, and are at present in the possession of the Eev. Dr. Sutton, at Endcliffe. The remarks which of late years have been made relative to the early connection between Chantrey and Eamsay, have been generally in a disparaging tone. With better information, and more truth, a recent writer on the subject says : — " A saying of Chantrey, not unfrequently heard by his early THE CARVER AND GILDER'S SHOP. 23 friends, when he chose to unbend and to reveal his secret purpose, which we do not find in Mr. Jones's Recollections, is, perhaps, more than any other, a key to his professional character — ' I do not study the ancients, but I study where the ancients studied — Nature.' This may be thought not quite consistent with the modesty and reserve which were observable in him at that early period of his life ; nor would he, perhaps, have suffered such a senti ment to escape him, except in the presence of intimate friends. Besides, we happen to know that if he did not study them, he spent the years of his apprenticeship in the midst of casts from the antique. Mr. Eamsay was not merely — as Mr. Jones represents him (page 2) — a ' carver in wood,' but was also a dealer in prints and plaster models, of which he had a large collection in his shop, in the High-street, in Sheffield, by far the best reposi tory of works of art then or since in that town. From these it is impossible that a mind like 24 WHAT IS GENIUS. Chantrey's should not have taken impression, when at so early a period of his life he was placed where they must have been constantly before him. The effect of his situation at Eamsay's has not been sufficiently considered by those who have written concerning him, nor has proper justice been done to a man of taste, good feeling, and some refine ment of manners. We believe that Eamsay and his apprentice did not go on very amicably together through the whole term of the indenture." The foregoing passage is from the " Atlas" and I quote it, as I may do some others from the same source, with the more confidence and pleasure, because I recognise, from what Dr Johnson calls its race, an Hallamshire author, well acquainted with, and a judicious admirer of Chantrey's genius from first to last. It is almost inevitable that we encounter, at this point, the oft-reiterated question — what is genius ? Must we admit that an early, long-devoted, and ORIGINAL GENIUS. 25 finally successful application to any of the higher arts, implies an original innate bias of the intellect to a particular study, conformably to the popular dogma, " Poeta nascitar nonfitf Or must we adopt the somewhat more convenient, if not more probable, hypothesis of Sir Joshua Eeynolds and Dr. Johnson, to the effect that genius is nothing more than the operation of a strong mind, acci dentally determined as to object ? It must be admitted that there is in our day, especially among the admirers of a certain class of phreno-doctrines, a strong leaning towards the notion that to attain pre-eminent success — " every kind of knowledge requires a peculiar genius, or mental constitution for the reception of some ideas, and the exclusion of others ;" an opinion, says Johnson, which has proved the most mischievous "of all the bugbears by which Infantes barbate, boys both young and old, have been frightened from digressing into new 26 IMPORTANCE OF STUDY. tracts of learning." In conformity with this senti ment, Beynolds asserts, that " assiduity, unabated by difficulties, and a disposition eagerly directed to the object of its pursuit, will produce effects similar to those which some call the result of natural powers." Whatever theory we favour, it will not lack illustration on the one part, from village gossip, which has attributed to the young rustic at least the usual amount of precocious ingenuity : nor, on the other hand, from the early and long- continued application of patience, industry, and zeal. The local tradition, which delights in recalling the days of the " Milk Boy," and in describing his old ass " Jock," is also fond — but on worse evidence — of describing the earnestness and inge nuity with which he was engaged during his drive along the lanes, in cutting the knob of his stick, with a penknife, into a likeness of " Old Fox, the FOXS HEAD. 27 schoolmaster."* This story has also given the hint of a picture to Parker — the only fact, probably, to which it has actual relation ; for, on mentioning it to an old man who was Chantrey's companion as a "milk-lad," during about two years, at intervals " off and on," he declared that he " never saw or heard anything of the sort ; but," added he, holding out his hand, " when I lost these two fingers, he sent me ten guineas, besides many smaller sums afterwards." The latest — and, indeed, the best story of this kind, which I have met with, inasmuch as it may not only be said to have been adduced on "If instead of " Old Fox's Head," we were to read a Fox's Head, making the date of the story a few years later, ¦ and changing the scene from "sub tegmine fagi" to Ramsay's workshop, it might serve to identify a clever little carving in wood, belonging to Mr. John Sykes, of Duke-street: it was executed as the model for a sportsman's silver drinking-cup ; and has always been regarded by the present owner and his father, as an early production of Chantrey's. E 2 28 TRADITIONARY ANECDOTES. quasi royal authority, but avowedly to shew how " a very slight thing might draw forth great talents," was told by Captain Ibbetson, in a public meeting held at Sheffield, in 1850, to promote Prince Albert's metropolitan " Exhibition of the Works of Industry of all Nations." — " A young man was in the field following the plough with his father, when the landlord came in, and was invited to luncheon. The boy was sent home, to desire his mother to prepare it. She was making a pork-pie, and the boy requested her to let him decorate it with a model of poultry he had made. When the landlord came, he was angry, because he thought they had sent to the town to get the ornamented pie. The father replied — No ; it was his son who had done it ; he made many such things, and wasted a deal of time upon them. The landlord perceived the talent of the youth, took him by the hand, and the boy became Sir Francis Chantrey, whose first work adorns the parish EAELY MODELLING. 29 church of Sheffield." It seems a pity to disturb so pretty a statement ; but if truth must be told — it is pure invention ! Another version of these Norton butter, pork- pie, and clay moulding fictions, is given in Fraser's Magazine for April, 1850. After remarking that "Mr. Jones passes lightly over this [the appren ticeship] stage in the great sculptor's career," the editor proceeds — " We are surprised at this cir cumstance, because Chantrey, when he could be got to speak about himself at all, used to describe with great humour the process of mind which led him to select the profession in which he rose to such dignified eminence. Many a pound of butter, it appears, (?) moulded itself under his plastic hands into the forms of objects which took his fancy as he passed to and fro in childhood from his mother's dairy to the nearest market town ; and many an hour stolen from sleep was dedicated to modelling, after maturer years had convinced him 30 TRADITIONARY ANECDOTES. of the superiority of clay over butter, and morsels of candle could be conveyed with safety to his garret in the farm-house. Finally, when it was proposed to him that he should follow the law, he protested against the arrangement — ' I would rather carve mirror frames for Mr. Eamsay,' was the answer." There is not a single line of pure truth in the whole of this circumstantial paragraph ! I wonder no one has noticed, as more tangible — if not better evidence of an early taste for schnitzwerk, a little design of clipped paper, such as our grandfathers exhibited in their valentines, and which I found, where it had hung framed and glazed for many years, in the house of one of Chantrey's distant relatives, and attributed to his boyhood, — than in most of the traditions above mentioned ! It would have been still more to the purpose, could it be proved that the " marvellous boy" took any particular interest in — what happily, he never imitated ! — a couple of great cherub-heads, EARLY MODELLING. 31 which he must have seen Sunday after Sunday, on Bullok's massive marble tomb, in Norton Church. Allan Cunningham tells his own story to illus trate his assertion that — genius draws its materials from many sources : — " The sight of a few prints in an obscure village in Yorkshire awakened the spark in Stothard; the carved figures in an old picture-frame did as much for Chantrey."* It is to be regretted that parties who have assigned such a variety of external promptings to the secret whisper " Hce tibi erunt artes,'' have been so inattentive to the where and when of their respec tive stories. Of these, the least probable, but most frequently repeated, is certainly that which represents him to have been, at a still earlier period, — if not a proficient — a devoted modeller in butter !— greatly to the surprise of one of his aunts. Such notices remind us of what Lucien of * Life of Komney the Painter. 32 ANECDOTE FROM LUCIEN. Samosata says of himself so facetiously under, the allegory of " A Dream," and in which he represents the genius of "Learning" contending for his allegiance against the genius of " Sculpture," to the latter of which claimants he was to be consigned, on the double plea that his uncle was a " Hermes- carver" — and, moreover, as he adds, "on account of certain toys, with the making of which, while a boy, I amused myself: for, after school-hours, I used to scrape together pieces of wax, whenever they fell in my way, and make cows, horses, and heaven forgive me ! even men, and very fine like nesses — as my father thought. This childish amusement, for which I had got many a box on the ear from my schoolmaster, was now brought as a proof of my natural turn ; and the best hopes were conceived, that by this plastic disposition I should in a short time become a great proficient in the art." The individual who took an active part in en deavours to place the fatherless Norton Boy in CHANTREY AND BRAMMALL. 33 some situation where he might, it was hoped, thereafter obtain a livelihood through his own industry, was the late Mr. Daniel Brammall, a celebrated file-manufacturer at Sheffield, and who, through his wife, a near relative of the Eev. Peter Eobinson, at that time vicar of Norton, was brought into intimacy with the family at Jordanthorpe. I have been told by a lady, who described one of the interviews between her uncle and the rosy-faced village lad, shortly before bis brief sojourn at the counter, that she should not soon forget the kind ness with which the former asked and pressed the latter, to name any trade to which he would like to be put ; nor the wavering diffidence which implied a disinclination to engage in any of the local handi crafts. It would, of course, be very easy at this point, — and, with the advantage of the after-know ledge of facts, — to sentimentalize on the premoni tions of genius, so apparently disregarded by the worthy file-maker in the natural preference of a mere F 34 CHANTREY AND TAYLOR. industrial occupation for his protege ; but such a speculation would be as unphilosophical in itself, as it would be unjust to him upon whose conduct it would seem to bear harshly. It is enough to say that none of the parties were gifted with prescience in this matter; and it is of more importance to mention the fact, that of all the friends which Chantrey made in early life, there was not one to whom he was more indebted — or whose kindness he was more ready to acknowledge — than that of Daniel Brammall. Emancipated from the thraldom and prospect of a most ungenial employment, the youth found him self at once in his proper element, among images and pictures — pencils and carving tools. Not only so, but he presently found in his new position, something still more congenial to his wishes or his taste — the late Sir Sitwell Sitwell was at that time finishing the interior of Eenishaw Hall, rebuilt by him, and there Taylor, in connection with Eamsay, TRIES TO MAKE A CAST. 35 was engaged in executing some of the work, — Chantrey, by good luck, being at once sent with him, to do any little service in his power. Here, he not only saw the practice, and talked about the art of modelling, but first tried his own " 'prentice ban' " on plastic materials. It is said he also accompanied the same ingenious moulder and carver while engaged in some work at Wentworth House. Be that as it may, he very soon began to indulge in more ambitious experiments, which, however little likely to enhance his merit in his master's estimation, sufficiently shew the bent of his genius. I was told by one of the persons present on the occasion, that Chantrey having determined to try his skill at a bust, persuaded one of Eamsay's workmen to submit to have a plaster cast taken from his face : the man, who was willing enough to play his part in the scheme, was duly laid at length, and properly " banked" on the work-bench, and a bucket of composition was f2 36 FIRST ATTEMPT AT A BUST. poured upon him. But while due provision had been made for his breathing by the mouth and his nostrils, the operator had forgotten or not been aware, how much the power to respire at all depended upon thoracic action — and such was the constriction of the muscles by the harden ing cast, that the man rolled down, and, with some difficulty, tore off the mould which, as he said, was " throttling him !" Taught but not foiled by this misadventure, Chantrey changed places with his shopmate, and with more courage and better success, submitting himself to the clammy effusion : in the mould thus produced, and by a process now sufficiently common, he cast a face, and thence proceeded to form the first composition in a line of art in which his surpassing abilities ultimately achieved such unprecedented celebrity. As a further illustration of his devotion to study at this period, it may be stated that he hired, at a trifling expense, a small room, whither he retired to CHANTREY AND RAMSAY. 37 improve himself in drawing and modelling during every spare hour which he could call his own. That a youth, thus occupied, was more likely to make an artist than an artizan — to become, in process of time, celebrated as a designer than immediately useful as a workman, may be admitted without disparagement to Eamsay or bis apprentice. " We believe," says the Atlas, " that Eamsay and his apprentice did not go on very amicably together through the whole term of the indenture." Perhaps they might not; but very exaggerated terms have been used on this point ; and certainly there is no need to throw the blame of their premature separation wholly on the master. Eamsay had in the house four or five apprentices, the eldest of whom, Botham, became his partner before Chantrey left. It has been said, on the one hand, that the master did not treat the youth quite kindly ; and on the other hand, that Chantrey felt the orderly character of 38 CHANTREY A PICTURE CLEANER. the family in which he was placed, irksome to him : neither of these statements is correct. Eamsay was a man, who — to use a phrase, happily much less appliable in our day than in his own — " spent his evenings from home ;" but he was not less invariably strict about the time his apprentices should be in the house at night, with the exception of Chantrey — " Frank," said he, " is incorrigible." It was often midnight before he came in : but neither master nor servant ever suspected he had been anywhere but in his obscure studio, drawing, modelling, or poring over anatomical plates. It may be added, that Eamsay was a pretty regular attendant at a place of worship : not so Chantrey. It should be mentioned, that in connection with his ordinary business of carving, gilding, and varnish ing frames, Eamsay was often employed as a picture cleaner : this was work to Chantrey's taste, and in its execution he was generally the chosen coadjator of his master, — who would sometimes RECIPROCAL KINDNESS. 39 say, in a moment of peculiar satisfaction, " Our Frank will one day make a shining character !" I have been told by one who lived in the family, that while she never saw the former act toward the latter otherwise than with kindness and respect; the young man was, in turn, always as gentle and amiable in his manners towards those about him as he was unexceptionable in his moral conduct. The parties separated, it is true, before the regular expiry of the period of apprenticeship ; but with expressions of kindness and good will on both sides. The writer of an early notice of Chantrey* says, in allusion to his efforts at drawing and modelling, exercised by stealth, during his * Blackwood's Magazine, April, 1820. This article was from the pen of Allan Cunningham, and was the only substratum of several subsequent memoirs. No person has better or more faithfully described whatever came within his own knowledge, than this writer ; but he has sometimes been misled, or mistaken, when relying on the information of others. 40 IDLE ALLEGATION REFUTED. apprenticeship — "These, we have learned, were much more pleasant speculations to him than to Eamsay, who, incensed either at the enthusiasm with which they were followed, or the success with which they were executed, defaced them, and ordered all such labours to be discontinued in future. For this conduct it is difficult to find either an excuse or a parallel :" and still more difficult would it be to find any evidence in support of a charge, so entirely without foundation. With respect to a story which has been told* to the effect that Chantrey after wards harshly retaliated this alleged unkindness of his old master, it may be disproof enough of the charge to state, that when Eamsay was living with his son in London, as he did for four or five years previous to his death, f he was in the habit of * By a correspondent in the " Gentleman's Magazine,'' March, 1842, p. 258. t Mr. Ramsay died November 20, 1828, and was buried in the Parish Church-yard, of Sheffield. CHANTREY AND WILSON. 41 frequently visiting the rooms in Pimlico, where Chantrey, when present, always received him kindly : so I am distinctly told by a gentleman not likely to be mistaken on this point. If Chantrey can be said to have received any instruction in the use of the pencil before he left Eamsay, his preceptor was Jonathan Wilson, after wards known in London as a medal-engraver — a man, whose attainments in an art still more difficult than that of the sculptor in marble, were the result of a self-cultivation of intuitive genius, not less remarkable than that of his eminent contemporary. Many persons will remember that low, gloomy shop, which formed a portion of the old High-street, Sheffield, as "Woollen's Circulating Library" — I recollect it gratefully, as the source of my earliest interviews with " The Gentleman's Magazine." In a back chamber of these premises, night by night, towards the close of his apprenticeship, did young Chantrey and his friend Wilson devote themselves 42 EARLIEST ATTEMPTS AT DRAWING. to the pencil, their principal exercise being to copy the drapery of a series of French prints of statuary. The earliest existing specimen of Chantrey's attempts at drawing with which I am acquainted, is of a periwinkle flower, framed and glazed, in the house of Mr. Biggins, adjacent to the cottage at Jordanthorpe : it is inscribed — " F. Chantrey, fecit, 1798." It is pleasing to find early mementoes of the artist prized at his birth-place. I last visited the spot on the 18th of February, 1850; and a casual glimpse of several tufts of snowdrops in the garden, not only recalled the touching effect of these flowers as carved in marble in the hand of one of " The Sleeping Children" at Litchfield, but also reminded me that one of these tufts was an early subject of the same pencil which delineated the other flower — in fact, the first production of any kind which, thirty years previously, I had seen from Chantrey's hand — it seemed not unfitly to symbolize the early and confident shooting up and CHANTREY AND RAPHAEL SMITH. 43 expanding of faculties which, like the flowrets themselves, " Midst sunny gleams, and sleety showers, Enjoyed a genial spring." Mr. Jones states that, " at the house of his master, young Francis met Mr. Eaphael Smith, the distinguished draughtsman in crayon — he became so impressed with the desire of practising art in a higher class than wood-carving that, at the age of twenty-one, he gave the whole amount of his wealth, that being fifty pounds — to induce him to cancel the indentures." The former part of this paragraph is substantially correct ; but, alas ! for the " fifty pounds," said to be paid " for the six months of his unexpired apprenticeship," neither Chantrey's purse, nor that of his mother, contained at that time any such sum ; nor were there only " six months" of the apprenticeship to expire, as above asserted, but between two and three years, as g 2 44 INDENTURE OF APPRENTICESHIP CANCELLED. the indenture — still in existence, and already cited — sufficiently testifies. I am, of course, aware that Chantrey could not have been legally detained beyond the age of twenty-one ; but the pecuniary obligations of his friends would still have remained in force. The truth is — the sum of fifty pounds was really paid for breach of covenant, and not merely as the price of half a year's outstanding service. I believe the money was advanced by Mr. Jenkins, of Hazlebarrow, a respectable farmer, who had been the friend of the elder Chantrey, and was highly esteemed by the Sculptor.* On one occasion, when Sir Francis and Lady Chantrey * I have heard three other parties named as the friends who assisted Chantrey in this emergency ; and it is right to state that John Read, Esq., explicitly concurs in the opinion that it was not Mr. Jenkins, but Mr. Raworth, of Rycroft— a relation of Chan trey's — who found the money both to pay the apprenticeship premium to Ramsay, and the price of cancelling the indenture. I do not, however, think the fact, that the latter " was a relative, JENKINS OF HAZLEBARROW. 45 were on a visit with John Eead, Esq., of Norton House, Mr. Jenkins, son of the last-named, was so solicitous for the party to pay him a friendly visit, that Chantrey, with his characteristic kindliness, accepted the invitation. The only difficulty was the mode of transit; no gentleman's coach could get along the miry lanes, and two miles was too much to walk in bad weather : the medium con venience of a covered cart was presently hit upon — the company arrived in safety ; and old " Hazle barrow Hall " presented that night such a scene of illumination to the sequestered valley in which it stands, as it had hardly exhibited since it was the residence of the Seliokes and Freschvilles. Little desagremens of time and place, at home and by will made Chantrey his heir, by which he got £300 or £400," sufficiently decisive evidence against the statement in the text, taken in connexion with the fact that the elder Chantrey made a will, (never, I believe, executed,,) in which Jenkins was named one of the trustees of the boy. 46 MOWING, THRASHING, AND PLOUGHING. and abroad, might tickle the temper, but they could not affect the good nature of the illustrious artist ; for whatever infirmities he might have, finicalness certainly was not one of them. It may indeed be doubted whether any other man, whose lot it was to share the personal notice of three British sovereigns in succession, ever exhibited less of " the proud man's contumely" toward his in feriors, either in genius or fortune, than the subject of these pages. Mr. Jones tells us " Sir Francis felt a pleasure in declaring that in his early career he had mowed an acre of grass in a day; had thrashed a quarter of corn in a day; and also ploughed an acre of land in a day." This is adduced, and has been repeated as evidence of the existence of that energy of character in the Norton farmer, which afterwards developed itself in the London Sculptor — and it must be admitted there is nothing sufficiently surprising in these alleged feats of strength and dexterity, to prompt, in any CHANTREY'S FEATS AT THE FARM. 47 member of "TheEoyal Agricultural Society" the question — "How could they be performed by a stalwart rustic ?" Still, I find the assertion con fronted in my mind with the natural inquiry — " When did Chantrey perform them ?" If we are told it was when he was a boy of sixteen — credat Judmus Amelia! If, during his apprenticeship with Eamsay, those who best knew both parties, will be the first to laugh at the absurdity of the supposition. The statement can only be saved from the horns of the foregoing dilemma by adopting the more desperate hypothesis, that after Chantrey had, in the impatience of genius, broken through his indentures as a mere carver and gilder, he went and qualified his hand for the more delicate use of the pencil as an artist, by wielding the scythe, swinging the flail, and guiding the coulter on his mother's little farm at Norton ! To return — I regret to be unable to assign the exact 48 NICHOLAS JACKSON. dates of Chantrey's withdrawal from Eamsay's service, or of his first visit to London : but the former event must have occurred in the winter of 1801-2, as in the month of April, in the latter year, he was taking portraits in Sheffield; and, according to his own testimony,* he also came up to town in 1802, I believe sometime in May; and this date is corroborated by evidence. While at Eamsay's, and immediately afterwards, Chantrey was a frequent and intimate visitor in the family of the late Mr. Nicholas Jackson, of Shemeld Croft, file-manufacturer, whose ancestors were also of Norton. Here, by night or by day, he felt him self at home, with young and lively persons of both sexes to welcome him. On one occasion, when he had retired to bed and was beginning to doze, he was startled by a tugging at his bolster : the agent • Gent's Mag. Pt. I., 1842, p. 259. Blackwood's April, 1820. CHANTREY AND "SUSANNA." 49 of this midnight molestation, silent as invisible, was so determined, that, although the young artist "held on" for awhile, the bolster "moved off." Instead, however, of burying himself in the bed clothes, for fear of ghosts, or crying out, "thieves!" he leapt up, shouting aloud — " Angels and ministers of grace, defend us!" | gilt.* "Believe me, dear Friend, " Your's, sincerely, " F. Chantrey." "Mr. T. A. Ward, Sheffield." * The little sketch in the letter really illustrates the writer's statement ; but in after years, Chantrey was always fond of a pencil pun, or representing a word by a hieroglyphic, especially when addressing any of his old and familiar friends, whose names were susceptible of being thus indicated. Indeed, there is reason to suspect that his fondness for graphic jokes led him, at least on one or two occasions, to venture incognito into the province of the celebrated Gilray. 2A PART IV. 2 a2 THE SCULPTOR IN SHEFFIELD. " Those who wish to trace the return of English Sculpture from the foreign artificial and allegorical style, to its natural and original character — from cold and conceited fiction to tender and elevated truth — will find it chiefly in the history of Francis Chantrey." — Blackwood's Magazine, April, 1820. To Norton, as the birth-place of Chantrey, I have already adverted at length, and to that village, as his selected burial-place, I shall return hereafter ; meanwhile, it has been shown that Hallamshire had a parental claim on the Painter — as the facts of this chapter will prove it had on the Sculptor also. 182 LACK OF SCULPTURE IN SHEFFIELD. Eidiculous as it would be to look for the germ of his genius in any of those fictions of boyhood which I have previously mentioned, it does not seem equally immaterial here to remark, that at the time when Eamsay's apprentice first began to try his hand at modelling, there was not perhaps a large town in England that afforded fewer examples or incentives to such a pursuit than Sheffield. Three recumbent figures, and one kneeling effigy, in the " Shrewsbury Chapel," at the Parish Church, comprised the monumental statuary — probably the work of Italian artists; while out-of-doors there were a respectably executed figure of Justice, by Waterworth, of Doncaster, at the head of the Shambles; a spirited profile of Shakspeare, with some dramatic symbols, on the pediment of the Theatre, executed by a wandering stranger of the name of Eenilowe,; a poor exhibition of the " Nor folk Arms" on the old Hospital Chapel, the joint work of one of the masons — Peter Skinner, of CHANTREY VISITED DISTANT COLLECTIONS. 183 Gleadless — and a rambling genius called "Jem Officer," from York ; a small lugubrious lion over the door of the Assay Office, by H. Mozlejr, once an employe of Eamsay's ; and, best of all, an " Angel," in terra-cotta, with a brazen trumpet, as a sign on the inn and in the street denominated there from — the early work of Eossi, who, while a youth, lived with his father in a house opposite. Of course our young aspirant saw what works of the chisel were to be seen at Wentwbrth House — the present noble gallery at Chatsworth did not then exist: indeed, with the writer in the Atlas, I " happen to know that the few collections of ancient sculpture which were within his reach while he lived in the country were visited by him, and that in particular he paid two visits to Newby, whilst still a young man and still younger artist, and came away deeply impressed by the works of sculpture in that man sion." Perhaps it should be added, as somewhat remarkable, that, with the exception of the figures 184 DETERMINES TO BECOME A SCULPTOR. of the Marquis of Eockingham at Wentworth, and the Earl of Strafford at Stainbro', there did not at the period of Chantrey's apprenticeship; — nor am I aware that there does at this day — exist a single standing life-size statue, of modern man or woman, in marble or gritstone, within doors or without, either in Sheffield or within the circuit of more than a hundred miles around the town. When, and wherefore then, did Chantrey abso lutely determine to abandon painting for sculpture ? These are questions which have repeatedly been asked and answered. But most of the printed notices on this subject are more ingenious than satisfactory — accident having apparently had as much to do with the matter as abstract reasoning. Undoubtedly his tastes for the sister arts may be said to have been twin-born, and for a time, mutu ally cherished. We have already seen how long and largely, and with what measure of success and promise, he exercised the brush — even in Sheffield : PROFESSIONAL COGITATIONS. 185 perhaps, it may be said, because this was the only immediate source of income. Mr. Ehodes — who knew Chantrey well — has a graphic passage descriptive of the perplexity and the embarrasment of the young enthusiast soon after he became an attendant at the Eoyal Academy. Leaving the students' room, which was then at Somerset House, in a state of bewildering indecision as to the branch of profession finally to be adopted, he returned to his own apartments — "spread his canvass before him, prepared his pallet, took up his pencils, began to paint; landscape, portrait, and history by turns attracted his notice, and mingled with his contemplations ; but the sculpture of the academy was continually before him, and the images it presented became associated with his thoughts," &c. Mr. Ehodes adds that, during this critical crisis, the young student visited and re- visited the Elgin marbles : — " this influenced his choice, and determined him to become a sculptor." This is all, 2b 186 EARLY ATTEMPTS AT MODELLING. no doubt, very true, in a general sense ; but if we apply the test of dates, it will be found that what at first sight seems only like the record of an after noon's struggle between the rival fascinations of Phidian and Apellean art, is really by the context shown to comprehend between three and four years ! Of the nature and progress of his early studies in London, it is not my purpose to speak; I have seen nothing that he produced at that time beyond a spread eagle, about four inches high, in wax, and a small hand and arm, formerly belonging to his mother at Norton, in clay; also a spirited study of an ancient head, in the possession of Eichard Bayley, Esq., of Castle Dyke ; and a child's head, in the possession of Thomas Stirling, Esq., at Shef field. This early work happened, when I last saw it, to be placed beside some fine specimens of the most ancient sculptures in the world — a couple of slabs from the mounds of Ninevah ! But there is CHANTREY'S ADVERTISEMENT. 187 evidence in what follows, coincidently with the earliest date of any existing life-model from his hand, that he was consolidating the success of the student into the confidence of the artist ; for in the Sheffield Iris of October 18, 1804, appeared the following advertisement : — " SCULPTURE AND PORTRAIT PAINTING. " F. Chantrey respectfully solicits the patronage of the ladies and gentlemen of Sheffield and its environs, in the above arts during the recess of the Eoyal Academy, which he hopes to merit from the specimens he has to offer to their attention at his apartments, No. 14, Norfolk-street. As models from life are not generally attempted in the country, F. C. hopes to meet the liberal sentiments of an impartial public." A lover of the arts, and having a head admirably adapted for the modeller's purpose, William Younge, Esq., M.D., of Sheffield, sat to Chantrey for a bust ; for this work, which, when finished, was deservedly 2 B 2 188 BUSTS OF YOUNGE, HUNT, AND WHEAT. admired, as presenting something more than the mere promise of excellence, the artist received twenty guineas. It is at present in the possession of John Jeeves, Esq., of Sharrow Grange. Two other busts were modelled at this period — one of the artist's early friend Mr. Hunt, a teacher of drawing, in Sheffield ; and one of James Wheat, Esq., solicitor, of the same place, who died in January, 1805. The exhibition of these works, along with that which will immediately demand a more extended notice, may almost be said to have formed an era of art in Sheffield, as well as in the history of the artist himself. It was during Chantrey's professional visit to Sheffield at this time, that an opportunity occurred for the exercise of his skill, upon which his destiny as a sculptor may be said at that moment to have depended. The Eev. James Wilkinson, the vene rated vicar of Sheffield, occasionally spent some time at his family mansion at Boroughbridge, and DEATH OF REV. J. WILKINSON. 189 there he died on Friday, the 18th January, 1805, in the 75th year of his age. The late Hall Over- end, surgeon, a zealous friend of Chantrey's, being in the neighbourhood at the time, went directly to Boroughbridge, sought and obtained permission for the young artist to take a cast of the face of the deceased. On reaching Sheffield, and communi cating this intelligence to Chantrey, he immedi ately borrowed a horse, and early on the Sunday morning was on his way northward, notwithstand ing the heavy snow that was falling at the time. He happily accomplished his object, at the expense of a ninety miles' ride, at the worst season of the year — a feat of horsemanship which few of the gentle devotees of the pencil or the chisel would be very willing to imitate, either on speculation or " commission." Mr. Wilkinson was highly respected, as he deserved to be, by his parishioners ; and the sagacity and activity of the Sculptor, will appear to 190 PROPOSED MONUMENT. be at least justified by the fact, that the lapse of a few days, not only produced the announcement of public mourning, but of a mezzotinto print of the late vicar, by J. E. Smith, Chantrey's master in crayons, from a painting by Needham, now in the Cutlers' Hall ; a medal, by Westwood, father of the present celebrated entomologist of that name, who was working as a die-sinker at Sheffield. This bust, along with those of Dr. Younge and Mr. Hunt, formed Chantrey's earliest contribution of models to the exhibition of the Eoyal Academy. They were much admired in London, and one of them was destined to a still more distinguished celebrity. On the 5th of August, 1805, a highly respectable party met at the Cutlers' Hall, Sheffield, to cele brate the late vicar's birth-day, their main object being to " collect the sense of the gentlemen assembled on the propriety of erecting a monument, by public subscription, to the memory of. a man who, for half a century, had dedicated his talents DEATH OF NKLSON — NAVAL PILLAR. 19J almost exclusively to the service of the town and neighbourhood." The project was warmly taken up, a committee formed, at the head of which was Dr. Brown — a name ever to be mentioned with honour, as one of the most zealous patrons of our " General Infirmary" — and, presently, the names of more than one hundred subscribers were an nounced. Before, however, any final decision had been come to by the monument committee as to the artist to be employed, the arrival of news of the death of Nelson and the victory of Trafalgar threw the whole country into a paroxysm of loyalty, in which the "town trustees" of Sheffield so deeply participated, that they advised the inhabitants " to forbear illuminating their houses on that occasion," as the corporate bodies of the town had it in con templation to raise a subscription for erecting in honour of the fallen hero " a naval pillar." This patriotic project, although not eventually carried 192 LETTER OF WILLIAM CAREY. out, was enthusiastically advocated by Mr. William Carey, a well-known connoiseur in art, who was at that time, as already mentioned, on a visit at Shef field as a picture-dealer. In a long letter which was published in the Iris, Nov. 21, 1805, he says of the good people of Hallamshire : — " Fortunately they possess in Eoche Abbey quarries a hard and durable stone,* and in Mr. Chantrey a sculptor, every way capable of fulfilling their intentions, and of reflecting credit on their choice. This young artist, whose modesty and zeal for improvement are equal to his talents, was born so immediately in the vicinity of Sheffield, that its townsmen will probably, at no distant period, be proud to claim him as a native of their town. The power of his hand in executing what he sees, and the readiness * It is worthy of remark, that the stone mentioned by Mr. Carey as so suitable for carving is almost identical, in source and quality, with that selected nearly half a century later for the erection of the new Houses of Parliament. CAREY'S RECOMMENDATION OF CHANTREY. 193 of his eye in catching a likeness, are exemplified in his admirable busts of the Eev. J. Wilkinson, the late vicar, and of Dr. Younge. There is a cold and timorous caution which can behold a man of genius struggling in obscurity, without daring to bear testimony to his merits. It requires a purer taste, an independent understanding, and something of a kindred spirit to discover the powers of a young artist in his first attempts. Chantrey had the good fortune, in Dr. Younge, to meet with an amateur whom nature and education, the classic acquire ments of travel, and a judicious survey of the treasures of art in Italy, have qualified to appre ciate his talents, and to bring forward his abilities to the public eye. It may not be improper to observe, that Chantrey has not fallen into the habit of servilely copying the forms of nature. His good taste and accurate reflections early enabled him to observe that a sculptor must take a certain license, owing to his being confined to a single cold 2c 194 PREDICTION OF THE SCULPTOR'S FAME. colour and to hard materials, which are too apt to fall into acute angles and unpleasant lines. Hence this young artist appears, by the light of his own mind, to have adopted a large and liberal outline and a fulness of contour, after the manner of the best sculptors, who most successfully imitated nature by going a little beyond her. It is this which gives to the bust of Dr. Younge, and to the other busts of this zealous artist, something of an historical dignity and a character of the antique, of which he is so passionate an admirer." Mr. Carey recommended that a column, surmounted with a colossal statue, should be erected on the site of the old Town Hall, at the church gates ; adding — " In executing the statue, Mr. Chantrey would possess a noble opportunity of signalizing his talents ; and should he be chosen to execute the monument, the spirit of prophecy, at this moment, involuntarily cries aloud that the work will equally commemorate the taste and spirit of Sheffield, the talents of the CHARACTER OF SHEFFIELD. 195 artist, with the victories and death of the immortal hero of Aboukir, Copenhagen, and Trafalgar." This high, but discriminating, and, as it now appears, almost prophetic panegyric, is the first notice of any of Chantrey's works which found its way into print. It was alike honourable to the youthful artist and to his veteran friend ; and I feel additional pleasure in transcribing such a testimony when I recollect that it was written and published in Sheffield, where, as the writer in the Atlas justly remarked, Chantrey's " eminent merits, then but dawning on the world, were discerned by the few individuals who were lovers of art ; and the people of that sociable and friendly town vied with each other in giving encouragement, as well as they were able, to one whose merits they could appreciate, though they might not be able to discern the eminence he was destined to attain." But while the noisy game of political cross- purposes, which occurred on the death of Pitt and 2 c 2 196 NELSON MONUMENTS. Fox in the ensuing year, and other local causes, closed the questions of limestone, or gritstone — of colossal or life-size in the statue — of the height and situation of the column — by abolishing the scheme of the Nelson monument altogether, the style of the busts above adverted to, and the tone of Carey's letter, were not without immediate effect. In after-life, the attention of the Sculptor was more than once turned to the subject of Nelson monu ments. To a mere pillar, he appears decidedly to have objected, on the ground that "no one knows until he is told" whose memory it is intended to honour : this objection does not seem conclusive. Chantrey himself is said to have proposed as a monument to the naval hero to be erected at Yar mouth, a statue of Nelson of so large a size, that it might serve as a light-house, the star on the breast to be the point of illumination ! In a letter written in 1815 to Mr. Alexander, then a young architect, who had consulted him about a monument, he NATURAL AND CLASSICAL STYLE. 197 replied — " If you place a statue of Lord Nelson on your column, it should be large and of substantial materials, not of thin plates of metal ; and it should be the principal ornament of the column — magnifi cently grand." Then referring to basso relievos on the plinth, he adds, " make the ornaments few in number, but let them be English — intelligible to the meanest capacity — you have nothing to fear from classical dunces." We seem to have in the foregoing opinions something like a key to the secret of his own success. He goes further, and contends that the hero should be represented " in the garb in which he won his renown, marking distinctly the period and the nation to which he belonged. It may be said this will not be classical ; I say it will be classical, if it be elegantly natural!'* Very good : common sense must, and genius ought, to concur in the sentiment. It may be asked — "Would Chantrey, then, have consented to raise a * Gent's. Mag. August, 1846. 198 TRUTH AND FALSEHOOD IN COSTUME. pillar, or to carve a cocked hat in marble ?" The Nelson monument, erected soon after the Sculptor's death, in Trafalgar Square, exhibits both, in bronze : and why should it not ? But do the Sculptor's remarks, as above quoted, go to the length of representing a mere civilian in the dress of the times in which he lived? I apprehend not; and yet, why should we tolerate and admire false hood, when chiselled in marble, or painted on can vass, any more than when said or sung ? The prevailing taste for busts and statues, modelled as if they were mainly blocks for the display of what the artist considers "drapery" — i.e., such a sheet like wrapper as he would be ashamed himself to wear in his studio, may prove that a carver in marble often exercises vastly more influence over the taste of his sitter than a preacher could do over his conscience; but it surely belies at once the honesty and the progression of an art which seeks to substitute for the appropriate, because actual, INDIVIDUALITY IN STATUES. 199 costume of every current age, the everlastingly monotonous formula of Greek and Eoman folds ! Why a plain English gentleman, who chooses to give a hundred guineas for a bust, should consent to be habited in any other way in marble than that in which he really appeared in fife — even if it were " the coat and waistcoat style" — would be difficult to imagine, did we not know how convenient it is for the sculptor to generalize his labour, and for the patron to resign his individuality, under the vague spell of classicality . What is it but this that renders the subject, so almost universally less, and the artist more interesting in statuary than in painting ? Good taste has almost entirely laughed shep herds and shepherdesses out of family pictures; and why are not the heroes and demigods of the Pantheon driven from our portrait sculpture ? The conventional uniformity of Greek and Eoman costume, may have simplicity to recommend it ; 200 FIGURES OF CANNING AND SLOANE. but it is at once a palpable violation of historical truth, and a sacrifice of individual verisimilitude. Let us only imagine that, by any accident, Chan trey's fine statue of Canning should get decapitated, would there be anything in the rest of the figure to preserve its identity ? — or even to indicate certainly either the age, the profession, or the country of the original ? Nay more ; are there not a thousand illustrious individuals named in the contemporary annals of an equal number of years, whose heads might be successively affixed to the modern torso without producing the slightest incongruity of effect ? This could hardly be affirmed — for ex ample — of the fine statue of Sir Hans Sloane, by Eysbrac, in the gardens of the Apothecaries' Com pany, at Chelsea. I am aware how surely anything that can be called admiration of such prolix costume will expose me to the charge of rusticity; but it will not be so easy to convince me that the British baronet-physician of the reign of George the FICTITIOUS DRESS OBJECTIONABLE. 20 L Second, would have been either more agreeably or more artistically represented in a dress of the style and age of Esculapius ! Nor let me be made responsible for imputed absurdities or exaggerations even in the direction of my own views. I may, perhaps, be permitted to argue that a statue of Sir Eoger de Coverley ought to represent him in the costume of an " old English gentleman ;" and to submit that a figure of William Penn would appear out of character in a Eoman toga, without forget ting that Sir Joshua Eeynolds protested against the garb of the Duke of Cumberland in Cavendish Square, or being supposed to be an apologist for the monumental perriwig of Sir Cloudsley Shovel in Westminster Abbey. I simply contend that to dress men of all ages, all countries, all professions in the monotonous formality of ancient art, is a fiction, as unwisely allowed to the modern sculptor, as it is justly denied to the painter and the poet. If "the ancients" sought to embody nature and 2 D 202 WILKINSON S BUST MODELLED. truth in art, why should not we do the same ? To resume. It was resolved that to Chantrey should be entrusted the execution of Mr. Wilkinson's monument, and that a marble bust of the deceased, should form part of the work. The original model was, as already mentioned, executed in the old Cutlers' Hall,* where the artist had before him the portrait of " Justice Wilkinson," as the vicar was generally called, from his attention to magisterial duties, painted by Needham, as well as his own materials for the likeness. * In 1833, this ancient building gave way to one of far greater convenience, as well as of acknowledged external beauty. Chantrey not only took considerable interest in the erection of the new Cutlers' Hall, but made the architect, Mr. Worth, his secret agent for the transmission of several sums of money to a mutual friend whose circumstances had rendered such donations necessary. The Sculptor likewise evinced his local attachment by the present of those casts of four of his finest busts, which now, among others, adorn the vestibule, viz. Watt, Scott, Canning, and Playfair. Having, in a previous page, mentioned Wilkinson's bust modelled. 203 At this time — the autumn of 1806 — Chantrey had a work-room in the premises of Mr. Todd, printer, in New Market-street ; and there he pro ceeded to copy, in marble, the portrait of the venerable clergyman, which he had already so happily embodied in plaster of Paris. As it was not only the first bead which the Sculptor had ever chiselled, but the first which, at that period, had ever been so executed in Sheffield, the curiosity, the expectation, and the wonder of the public were largely excited during the important process of carving. The result was entirely successful. The that the old Cutlers' Hall, in Chantrey's early life, only contained middling portraits of Wilkinson and Athorpe, to which was afterwards added a copy of one of Thomas Hanbey, founder of the Charity called by his name — I may add here that its noble saloon can at present boast capital full-length pictures of Hugh Parker, Esq., Lord Whamcliffe, the Duke of Wellington, Rev. Dr. Sutton, the Duke of Norfolk, Dr. Younge, and Earl Fitz- william : to these it is in contemplation presently to add that of Joseph Hunter, the Historian of the District. 2 D 2 204 POETICAL COMPLIMENTS. monument, which, in the month of December, 1806, was placed in the chancel of the Parish Church of Sheffield, was "much and deservedly admired, not only as a faithful and affecting resem blance of a venerable and lamented character, whose virtues will consecrate the marble which records them — but also as a chaste and exquisite specimen of the talents of a young artist, whose genius we are firmly of opinion is destined hereafter not only to confer celebrity on the little village of Norton, the place of his birth, but to reflect glory on his native country itself." This was the testi mony of the poet Montgomery, who, by the publi cation of his " Wanderer of Switzerland" that very year, had excited in the minds of his townspeople and others, an almost exactly corresponding tone of happy prediction. Nor was the accomplishment of the Sculptor's task ungreeted with rhyme r — " 'Tis thine, 0 Chantrey ! thus with matchless skill, To mould our passions at thy plastic will ; POETICAL COMPLIMENTS. 205 And as the marble grows beneath thy hand, Our charmed feelings rise at thy command ; Blest is the hand that gives the mourner rest, That pours the 'joy of grief into his breast : Dear is the power that soothes the tender heart ; Sweet are the consolations of thy art : Oh ! wondrous art — which thus the face can save, Which fond affection follows to the grave ! Pursue the path you now so greatly tread, And save from ' dumb forgetfulness' the honoured dead." These lines are part of a poem which appeared in the "Iris" of January 20, 1807; and I once thought they were written by the lady whose por trait (No. 14) is mentioned on a preceding page: she certainly often stood beside the Sculptor while he was at work — not as an unconcerned spectator — and an addiction to versifying was no secret among her friends : but the panegyrist was, in this case, Mrs. Sterndale. In the Doncaster Gazette of December 9, 1808, appeared anonymously some lines, by Mrs. Hoole — afterwards better known as Mrs. 206 ME. AND MRS. HOFLAND. Hofland — on a cast of the bust of Wilkinson, in the possession of Mr. Inchbald : — " Hail ! to the artist who, from mouldering earth, Snatch'd the fine semblance of departed worth ; From death's dread empire, won each living grace, And breathed perfection o'er the plastic face ; Chantrey, be thine the undivided aim, To seize the Sculptor's rare and glorious fame, From Attic honours pluck unfading bays, And rival Athens in her proudest days." I gladly quote these lines here, because their introduction affords the only opportunity I shall have of mentioning in these pages the name of a lady who was not only esteemed by Chantrey for her genius and her worth, but by the inhabitants of Hallamshire, as one who has conferred honour on the solum natale. Her husband, the painter, who was as fond of angling as Chantrey himself, dedicated to the Sculptor a pleasant book on fisher-craft. MONTGOMERY'S EULOGY OF CHANTREY. 207 Sixteen years afterwards, when Chantrey had even then more than realized the foregoing predic tions, Montgomery — whose poetical reputation had equally advanced — thus spoke of his artist-friend, while eulogizing the worthies of Hallamshire, at a public meeting held for establishing " The Sheffield Literary and Philosophical Society :" — " Chantrey was not indeed a native of this town, but having been born within the limits of this corporation, he belongs to us, and is one of us. Whatever previous circumstances very early in life may have taught his eye to look at forms as subjects for his thought, his pencil, or his hand, it was in Sheffield, — after he had been called hither from the honourable occupation of husbandry, which 'kings and the awful fathers of mankind' of old did not disdain to follow, — it was in Sheffield that his genius first began to exercise its plastic powers, both in painting and in sculpture. It was in Sheffield that the glorious alternative was presented to him, either to 208 MONTGOMERY'S EULOGY OF CHANTREY. be one among the greatest painters of the age, or to be one alone as the greatest of its sculptors. It was in Sheffield, likewise, after he had made the wiser choice, that he produced his first work in marble ; and Sheffield possesses that work, and I trust will possess it till the hand of time, atom by atom, shall have crumbled it to dust." The execution of Mr. Wilkinson's monument, proceeded the speaker, was assuredly " the most interesting crisis of the artist's life — the turning point that should decide the bias of his future course. Having employed a marble- mason to rough-hew the whole, he commenced his task. With a hand trembling yet determined, an eye keenly looking after the effect of every stroke, and a mind flushed with anticipation, yet fluctuating often between hope and fear, doubt, agony, and rapture — perplexities that always accompany con scious but untried power in the effort to do some great thing — he pursued his solitary toil, day by day, and night after night, till, the form being MONTGOMERY S EULOGY OF CHANTREY. 209 slowly developed, at length the countenance came out of the stone, and looked its parent in the face ! To know his joy, a man must have been such a parent. The throes and anguish, however, of that first birth of his genius in marble, enabled that genius thenceforward, with comparative ease, to give being and body to its mightiest conceptions. Were I a rich man, who could purchase the costly labours of such a master, I almost think that I could forego the pride of possessing the most successful effort of his later hand, for the nobler pleasure of calling my own the precious bust in yonder church. Works of genius and of taste are not to be valued solely according to their abstract excellence as such, but they may become inestima bly more dear to the heart, as well as interesting to the eye, in proportion as they awaken thought, feeling, recollection, sympathy — whether in alliance with the. subject itself, the circumstances under which it was undertaken, or the conflict and 2 E 210 BUST OF BIGLAND. triumph of the artist in achieving his design. In all these points the plain but admirable monument before us transcends every other that has come or can come from the same hand, since the experienced and renowned proficient can never again be placed on a trial so severe, with an issue so momentous, as the youthful aspirant, unknown and unpractised, had to endure in this first essay of his skill on the block that might eternize his name, or crush his hopes for ever. This, I believe, is the true history of the outset of Mr. Chantrey, who was destined thenceforward, at his pleasure, to give to marble all but fife, for ' What fine chisel Could ever yet cut breath ?' " Shakespear's Winter's Tale. Three of the busts above-mentioned were ex hibited in the Eoyal Academy, in 1805; and, in the following season, the bust of Bigland, the Essayist, which was executed at Doncaster. In COLOSSAL HEAD OF SATAN. 21 1 1808, he startled the good people of Sheffield by the exhibition of a gigantic head of Satan, modelled in the attic occupied by him in No. 24, Curzon- street, May-Fair, London. Chantrey's figure was not, of course, the vulgar hobgoblin of the crowd, but the fallen spirit, whose " form had yet not lost All her original brightness, nor appear'd Less than archangel ruined, and the excess Of glory obscured ;" as he is represented addressing the sun, in that famous passage of the Fourth Book of " Paradise Lost," beginning — " 0 thou, that with surpassing glory crown'd, Look'st from thy sole dominion, like the God Of this new world," &c. I well recollect that local critics, in their remarks on this bold attempt to embody Milton's sublime conception of the great enemy of mankind, were divided into three classes — those who, like Lord 2e 2 212 MONTGOMERY'S LECTURES ON POETRY. Egremont, appeared solicitous that the Sculptor should set himself to make a capital " statue of the Devil;" those who objected to the somewhat Orestes-like fashion of coiling a snake with the hair, as a trick of vulgar horror ; and, lastly, those who deprecated, on moral grounds, the realization in marble — thus combining with so pure a material, the highest effect of art — of any idea of the old arch-fiend ! I am not certain what opinion Mont gomery entertained on these particular points, but he repeatedly suggested to Chantrey another sub ject, not only wholly unobjectionable in itself, but even as a companion-statue — equally adapted to draw forth all the powers of the artist, as well in the expression of mental emotion as in the develope- ment of muscular energy, viz. : — Samson, as he is pourtrayed in Milton's exquisite tragedy of " Sam son Agonistes." In after years, Montgomery embodied in his Lectures on Poetry, a striking passage relative to MILTON'S " SATAN " AND " SAMSON." 2 1 3 the two grand Miltonic creations above alluded to : it has never appeared in print before ; and I am kindly permitted to copy from the author's MS. : — " Satan's Address to the Sun, in the Fourth Book of Paradise Lost, is deservedly one of the most admired passages in the poem. There, the arch-fiend, broken loose from hell, and for the first time eyeing the new-created light of another world, is miserably reminded of the high state of bliss from which he had been cast down by pride, and worse — ambition. In the opening of Milton's tragedy, Samson is brought out of the dungeon, and laid on a bank to enjoy the warmth of day, and the freshness of the breeze. On his way, he speaks first to his attendant, and then to himself, on his departed glory, his degrading bondage, and his lamentable darkness. Satan and Samson thus present most striking spectacles of man and angel fallen by transgression from the highest eminence which either could reach. The contrast is both 214 MILTON'S " SATAN" AND " SAMSON," sublime and affecting. The fiend, racked with doubt and horror on the threshold of his new attempt to cope with the Almighty, not in the open field by violence, but, covertly, by fraud — that fiend carrying the hell that stirs within himself into the bosom of Paradise, looks up to the sun with rage and agony, and calls him by his name to tell him how he hates his beams, and recoils from his splendour, as that which most annoys his sense of guilt and aggravates his fixed despair. Samson, on the other hand, blind and bound, and captive to the Philistines, having a breathing-space from prison-labour — equally reminded of lost bliss, and present pain, and future hopelessness — outstretches his arms and lifts his face, as the blind are wont to do, towards the light, and longs to see and bless the sun, and tell him how he loves his beams. The arch-angel in eclipse, is scarcely a more magnificent being than Samson, the ruin of himself, thus cast upon the earth, and lamenting all his woes — but, AS SUBJECTS FOR SCULPTURE. 215 most of all, his loss of sight !" Montgomery then, after some remarks on the versification of " Samson Agonistes," quotes at length from the pathetic monologue, beginning — " A little onward lend thy leading hand To these dark steps,"