Ethical Christianity Preachers of The Age YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY J935 This book was digitized by Microsoft Corporation in cooperation with Yale University Library, 2008. You may not reproduce this digitized copy of the book for any purpose other than for scholarship, research, educational, or, in limited quantity, personal use. You may not distribute or provide access to this digitized copy (or modified or partial versions of it) for commercial purposes. (J)reac0er0 of t$t (&$t REV. HUGH PRICE HUGHES, M.A. a— 4 KSSsW/n. a- /7S7.6-',. ~&rysi.(2 fl>. ty ~, c-^ pQ?*- ^ .-— ./ ..-¦-- ¦¦;..-./ /{'-. fj.. ~'J/0l <7-J,fc7^-ri'CT^ ETHICAL CHRISTIANITY SERIES OF SERMONS BY THE REV. HUGH PRICE HUGHES, M.A., AUTHOR OF "SOCIAL CHRISTIANITY," "THE PHILANTHROPY OF GOD," ETC. ** He's true to God who's true to man ; wherever wrong is done, To the humblest and the weakest, 'neath the all-beholding sun, That wrong is also done to us ; and they are slaves most base, Whose love of right is for themselves, and not for all their race." Lowell. NEW YORK E. P. DUTTON & CO. 31, WEST TWENTY-THIRD STREET H814 THIS VOLUME is DEDICATED TO THE SISTERS OF THE PEOPLE, WHOSE LIVES ILLUSTRATE THE ETHICAL CHRISTIANITY IT ADVOCATES. PREFACE. Nothing is more remarkable and, from one point of view, more encouraging than the fact that every attack which has been made upon the Christian religion has been founded upon a total misconception of its nature. In our own day a great many persons, both educated and uneducated, have imagined themselves to be opponents of Christianity. But when their arguments and denunciations are carefully ex amined, it is found that what they have rejected is some perversion or caricature. Nothing is more common than to hear persons talking about " giving up " Christianity who have never had any real Christianity to give up; or, to speak more accurately, who have never given up anything really Christian which they were fortunate enough to possess. A short time ago one of the great apostles of Positivism astonished mankind by announcing that he had been a Christian in his youth, and then proceeded with the utmost naivete to disclose that by being a Christian in his youth he meant that when he was a boy he held certain metaphysical dogmas with respect to the creation of the universe and the nature of the soul ! The most common delusion of clever persons who imagine that they have rejected Christianity, is to suppose that Christianity consists in a creed, and especially in the acceptance of certain vill PREFACE. mysterious dogmas about which even Christian opinion is divided. It is really quite surprising that any one could honestly confound Orthodoxy with Christianity, because, as John Wesley used to say in his emphatic and decisive manner, you may be as orthodox as the devil and as wicked. Not that I in the least underestimate the import ance of orthodoxy or correct thoughts with respect to spiritual facts. But every one ought to be aware that it is possible to receive dogmatic formulae as a train of thought in the brain without experiencing even an infinitesimal trace of real Christianity. I have said that the extraordinary delusion to which I have referred is, from a certain point of view, very hopeful. I mean that it would have been an exceedingly ominous thing if sincere and intelligent persons had really con sidered the claims of true Christianity and then rejected. What many upright and ardent souls have rejected is a misconception, a caricature, a subjective Christianity of their own, a traditional delusion which no more resembles real Christianity than the conventional Christ of the painted Church window resembles Jesus Christ of Nazareth. It is true that at this moment the great majority ofthe people of this country never go to any place of worship, and this is yet more the case on the continent of Europe. Does it in the least degree indicate that the masses of the European nations have weighed Christianity in the balance and found it wanting? Nothing of the sort. The over whelming majority of them have not the faintest conception of what Christianity is. I myself have met a great number of so-called " agnostics " and " atheists " in our universities, among our working men, and in society, but I have never yet met one who had rejected the Christianity of Christ. PREFACE. IX Many of the so-called unbelievers have a great deal to say about the horrors and iniquities of ecclesiastical history, the inconsistencies of Christians, and the immorality of some doctrines that have been held by sincere but ill- informed professors of the Christian religion. But all this is utterly wide of the mark. As the learned and now sainted Bishop Lightfoot was never weary of reminding us, Chris tianity is Christ. " One. might have thought it impossible," he exclaimed, " to study with common, attention the records of the Apostles and martyrs of the first ages, or of the saints and heroes of the latter Church, without seeing that the consciousness of personal union with Him, the belief in His abiding presence, was the mainspring of their actions and the fountain of all their strength." Precisely the same truth is taught by Dr. Dale in the invaluable and most timely work to which I refer in the thirteenth sermon in this volume. Exactly similar testimony might be quoted from the most remarkable work that ever proceeded from the pen of the late Cardinal Newman, his Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent. He proves to demonstration that the only possible explanation of the triumph of Christianity in the first centuries was the intense personal devotion of living Christians to a living Christ. On this point all real Christians of all schools are unanimous. But what oppo nent or critic of Christianity has ever so much as examined the personal testimony of all Christians to their personal union with Christ, and in numerous cases to their conscious ness of that union ? Christianity aims at producing a particular kind of life upon earth, and it declares the only way in which that particular kind of life can be realized. What that kind of life is I have tried to explain in this volume. X PREFACE. I do not believe that there is any honest agnostic or unbeliever in the world who would object , to the sort of conduct which is exemplified and advocated in these sermons. All the noblest unbelievers have now accepted the ethical teaching of Christ as the highest and best. We are agreed with respect to the practical result at which we ought to aim. Now, can that practical result be achieved on a large scale in any way except in the Christian way ? We appeal to the tribunal of history and declare that Christ like men and women can be produced only by Christ ; and He Himself can produce them only by entering into living union with such men and women as are willing to receive the Christ-like life from Him. Therefore we Christians all agree with Bishop Lightfoot in the strong statement that " the core of the Gospel does not lie " in " the moral teaching and the moral example of our Lord. Its distinctive character is, that in revealing a Person it reveals also a principle of life — the union with God in Christ, apprehended by faith in the present and assured to us hereafter by the Resurrection." Nevertheless, it is of great importance that all men should clearly understand what is the nature of that Ethical Christianity which is the direct and inevitable fruit of vital union with Jesus Christ. What that Ethical Christianity is, this volume tries to explain. HUGH PRICE HUGHES. 8, Taviton Street, Gordon Square, London, September, 1891. CONTENTS. THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. PAGE " What do ye more than others ? " — Matt. v. 47 ... .., 1 THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. " Thy will be done, as in heaven, so on earth." — Matt. vi. 10 17 THE CHRISTIAN IMAGINATION. " Your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams." — Acts ii. 17 ... ... ... ... 33 THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY. " After a long time the lord of those servants cometh, and maketh a reckoning with them. " — Matt. xxv. 19 ... ,., 43 THE CHRISTIAN DISCIPLESHIP. "Whosoever he be of you that renounceth not all that he hath, he cannot be My disciple.'' — Luke xiv. 33 ... ... 59 THE CHRISTIAN HOPE. " I saw a new heaven and a new earth." — Rev. xxi. 1 ... 71 THE CHRISTIAN AUTHORITY. " I also am a man set under authority." — Luke vii. 8 ... 79 xii CONTENTS. THE CHRISTIAN ARISTOCRACY. PAGE " Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give His life a ransom for many." — Matt. xx. 28 ... ... ... ... ... ... 93 THE CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY. "The common people heard Him gladly." — Mark xii. 37 ... 105 THE CHRISTIAN CHARITY. " To-day is salvation come to this house, forasmuch as he also is a son of Abraham." — Luke xix. 9 ... ... ... 117 THE. CHRISTIAN USE OF EVIL. "Simon, Simon, behold, Satan asfcetf to fiase you. [margin,. ' ob tained you by asking '], that he might sift you as wheat : but I made supplication for thee, that thy faith fail not : and do thou, when once thou hast turned again, stablish thy brethren." — Luke xxii. 31, 32 ... ... ... ... ... 129 THE CHRISTIAN ASPECT OF THE CENSUS. ' ' When thou takest the sum of the children of Israel according to those that are numbered of them, then shall they give every man a ransom for his soul unto the Lord, when thou numberest them ; that there be no plague among them, when thou numberest them." — Exod. xxx. 12 ... ... 141 THE DECISIVE EVIDENCE OF CHRISTIANITY. " Until the day dawn, and the Day-star arise in your hearts." — 2 Pet. i. 19... ... ... ... ... ... 155 THE CHRISTIAN TRIUMPH. " Be of good cheer ; I have overcome the world." — John xvi. 33 167 THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. " To make some work of God's creation a little fruitfuller, better, more worthy of God ; to make some human hearts a little wiser, manfuller, happier, — more blessed, less accursed ! It is work for a God."— Carlyle. B— 4 THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. "What do ye more than others? " — Matt. v. 47. " What do ye more than others? " or, as the heart-search ing question of the Great Teacher has been literally and skilfully translated, " What do ye extra ? " Christianity is an " extra." Not a substitute for, but a supplement to every good thing already in the world. Christ came "not to destroy, but to fulfil " ; to complete, to realize. Listen to His greatest apostle : " Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honourable" (or to be revered), " whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are gracious ; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things." 1 That is a most comprehensive and ex haustive catalogue, claiming for Christian use and service every form of heathen goodness. First of all, then, let us realize, acknowledge, and lay on one side every form of heathen, or, as we might better say, Gentile goodness. By this process of exhaustion let us dis cover the Christian " extra." For Christianity must possess something more than others, or be utterly discredited. Now, 3.II that is best in the Gentile world may be summed up in 1 Phil. iv. 8, 9. 4 THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. two names, one European and the other Asiatic — Socrates and Buddha. John Stuart Mill, in his famous and ever- valuable essay on "Liberty," casually institutes a comparison between Socratic and Christian morality. He assumes that there is a contrast, if not an antagonism, between the ethical teaching of Jesus Christ and that of the great Athenian. He describes Christian morality as a negative and ascetic reaction from paganism. There could be no more complete and absolute delusion. In that statement John Stuart Mill totally misrepresents ethical Christianity. What was the Socratic morality, beyond doubt the highest "natural goodness " of Europe ? The Socratic ethics are immortal ized in the masterpiece of the golden thinker of Greece. We turn to the " Republic" of Plato and find that his moral teaching is summed up in the four cardinal virtues — wisdom, courage, temperance, and justice. Does Christianity reject any of these, or disparage any of these? Most certainly not. Christianity gladly accepts them all. Christianity declares that the man who is devoid of either of them is a most imperfect and unworthy Christian. But when any one professing and calling himself a Christian has accepted in their noblest forms all the great Socratic virtues, the question of Christ remains, "What do ye extra}" The slightest historic investigation will show that these great and manly virtues coexisted in Greece with slavery, militarism, and the subjection of woman — three particulars in which even John Stuart Mill would confess that the morality of Socrates was immeasurably inferior to the morality of Christ. We turn now to the highest " natural goodness " of Asia embodied in the life and teaching of Buddha. Modern Europe realizes that Buddha was morally greater than Socrates, because he exhibited a gentle and gracious humanitarianism THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. 5 to which Socrates was a stranger. Let us exalt Buddha as he deserves to be exalted, but he is still immeasurably inferior to Christ, Sir Edwin Arnold himself being our witness. His testimony is of peculiar value in consequence of his excessive adulation of Buddha in " The Light of Asia." He has done more than any one else to exalt Buddha in the affection and reverence of the modem world. But he has recently published another great poem, entitled " The Light of the World." In that volume, which is a poetic version of the life of Christ, he has made amends for his excessive adulation of Buddha in " The Light of Asia." Thoughtful Christians had a grievance against Sir Edwin Arnold, inasmuch as that exquisite poem was calculated to mislead the unwary. It would have been impossible for any man to write "The Light of Asia" who was not saturated with Christianity. The Buddha of the poem is a much better person than the Buddha of history. It is an idealized, a Christianized Buddha. In "The Light of the World" Sir Edwin Arnold refutes the error into which some have been betrayed by his extravagant praise of Buddha. By a very ingenious poetic licence he represents the wise men of the East, who visited the cradle of our Lord, as Hindu Buddhists. One of them is described as returning, in his extreme old age, three years after the Ascension of our Lord, to inquire what had become of the young King. He makes the acquaintance of Mary Magdalene. The greater part of the poem consists of an imaginary conversation, extending over a week, in which, in melodious language, she describes to him the principal events of the life of Christ. Now, the serious interest of this poem lies in the fact that from time to time Sir Edwin Arnold, who is one of the most careful and profound 6 THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. students of Buddhism now living, puts into the mouth of the aged Buddhist confessions and acknowledgments of the superiority of Christ. He points out what truths Christ taught beyond those which Buddha taught. This testimony from Sir Edwin Arnold is intensely interesting, because, as I have said, he has done more to exalt Buddha in England and in Europe than any other literary man. Here, then, we have the apologist and the eulogist of the great Hindu paying his tribute to the superiority of Jesus Christ. In the course of the poem he mentions at least four particulars in which Christ and His teaching are incom parably superior to Buddha and his teaching. The first is supposed to be uttered by the aged Buddhist — " Truly, nowise have we known before Wisdom so packed and perfect as the Lord's, Giving that Golden Rule that each shall do Unto his fellow as he would have done Unto himself; for then this earth were heaven." That is the first evident superiority of the Christian reli gion. Its ethical teaching is plain and practical. There is much that is mystical and inscrutable in Buddhism. But any man who sets himself to understand the moral side of the New Testament need have no doubt as to what he ought to be or do. It is summed up in the profound but simple Golden Rule that you should do unto others as you would they should do unto you. The next striking peculiarity of the Christian faith is expressed in the following words : — " Also, right joyous goes His doctrine ; glad 'Mid Life's sad charms and swift vicissitudes, And Death's unshunned and hard perplexities Which make us bear to live. But Buddha held Life was long sorrow." THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. 7 To this Mary Magdalene replies — " Oh, good Friend ! that soul Hath done with sadness which knows Christ aright." The second superiority of the Christian faith is its intense joyousness. Buddhism is a gloomy, ascetic, pessimistic religion; a religion of despair, which, in answer to the question, "Is life worth living?" says, "No! it must be devoted to getting rid of life." What an unhealthy contrast to the true faith, which expresses itself in such words as — "My God, I am Thine, What a comfort divine, What a blessing to know that my Jesus is mine ! " Then comes the third superiority of the Christian religion — "... Whence are words to thank These words which teach me where thy Jesus filled The leaf of wisdom in, and wrote for men The name Lord Buddha would not say nor spell ? Thou, reporting from thy Master's mouth, ...... doth inscribe This mighty name of " Love," and biddest believe Not law, not fate, not fore-ordained course Hath moulded what we are, and built the worlds ; But living, regnant Love." The Christian religion, instead of leaving the Ultimate Fact of the universe in darkness, in unspeaking mystery, tells us in plain words that It is not the Unknown, the Unknowable, or the Unspeakable, but a personal God whose nature is Love. He who has not yet realized the true significance of that Fact can have no conception what a revelation it was. Until Christ came all lands were wrapped in gloom. In Asia, as is the case to-day, men were in doubt whether there was a God or not, whether the ultimate cause of this 8 THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. universe was a person or some blind, resistless force. Even those who believed in a personal existence had a terrible conception of the fury and ferocity of their God. Christ comes, and tells us that God is Love ! This glorious fact is the essential peculiarity of the Christian faith. One more marked distinction between Christianity and Buddhism is uttered in the following confession of the Buddhist to the Magdalene : — " Also, who enters — if I gather well — Into this kingdom, in thy Master's train, Hath, for its secret, not to love himself; Nor seek to save himself; nor — lonely — wend Over dead duties and affections slain, Towards such Nirvana ; but to cherish still His neighbour as himself ; and save his soul By losing heed of it, in heedful care That all his doings profit men, and help The sorrowful to hope, the weak to stand." Then he goes on to admit how immeasurably superior Christianity is to Buddhism, because it seeks the way to " selflessness " "Not by hard stress of lone philosophies, Nor scorn of joys, nor sad disparagement Of life and living things as shadows vain ; But — nearer road, and new ! — by heart to see Heaven closest in this Earth we walk upon, God plainest in the brother whom we pass, Best solitudes 'mid busy multitudes, Passions o'ercome, when master-passion springs To serve and love and succour." In other words, the Christian faith has for its supreme quality its social character. The pre-eminent purpose of the Christian man is not to save his own soul whatever may become of his neighbour's. He realizes that it is impossible to separate himself from his fellow-men, and that there is THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. 9 no way in which he can achieve his own salvation without achieving that of his race. Instead of gloomy asceticism which drives its victims from the ordinary intercourse of human society, he realizes that he ought to mix with men, enter into every healthy relation, and take his part in every activity of life, proving, as S. John said, his love to God by his unmistakable love to his fellows. These, then, on the high and impartial authority of the great writer I have quoted, are the four striking features in which our faith is immeasurably superior even to Buddhism — (1) The ethical teaching of Christianity is much more intelligible ; (2) it is not gloomy and pessimistic ; (3) it does not involve the nature of God in impenetrable darkness ; (4) it teaches that we are to save our own souls by saving our brethren. Nevertheless there are profound truths in Buddhism, and Christianity accepts every one of them. Christianity claims all the Buddhist virtues, and then s.iys, " What do ye extra i " So much for the best ancient systems of morality. Let us come now to our own doors. We find beautiful and touching " natural goodness " not only in the adherents of the ancient ethical systems of Europe and of Asia, but in the masses of modern heathen who are outside all the Christian Churches, and who make no profession of religion. Illustrations abound on every side. I recollect one which deeply impressed me some years ago. A drunken, rough, foul-mouthed navvy was at work in a railway cutting. Suddenly an express train rushed round the curve at a short distance from the spot on which he was standing. In a moment the navvy realized that upon the line there was a log which might turn the engine off the rails and sacrifice the lives of innocent men, women, and children. IO THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. There was not a second to be lost. The peril to himself ¦was enormous. But without the least hesitation, he dashed upon the line, dragged away the log, and before he himself could escape was flung into eternity ! Surely that was a most Christ-like act. He deliberately laid down his life a ransom for many. Yet he made no profession of religion, and was in no sense a religious man. Let us realize his heroic and disinterested self-sacrifice, and then listen to the great question, "What do ye extra ? " Let me mention only one other illustration of the splendid virtue sometimes exhibited by the utterly irreligious. A casual dock-labourer, after being out of work for a long time, secured a few days' employment, and then, in order not to reduce by one penny the miserable pittance which would be available for his starving children, he himself went without food for three days while he toiled wearily on. On Friday afternoon he hastened to receive his pay, and as he was stretching out his hand to take it, he dropped down dead — starved in his desperate effort to obtain ample food for his little children. These Christ-like episodes are no embarrassment to Christians who believe that Christ lighteth every man that cometh into the world. But what a revelation they are of the amount of genuine — if occa sional and intermittent — goodness outside the Christian Church ! And what force and emphasis they put into the great question, "What do ye extra V We Christians are bound to practise every virtue manifested both by ancient and by modern heathen, and then to supplement them all by some distinctive Christian quality justifying the supremacy which we claim for Christ. But we have not yet exhausted the extraordinary significance of our text. It reminds us that we must THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. II surpass Jewish as well as Gentile goodness. Let us, then, realize, acknowledge, and lay on one side the highest achievements of Jewish goodness. These are summed up in the Ten Commandments, which are immensely superior to anything that either Buddha or Socrates ever taught, because they place before the human conscience a plain and divine morality illuminated and vitalized by the service of the living God. In some respects the great Gentile teachers approximated to the second Table of the Law. But they taught nothing comparable with what was inscribed on the first Table. The superiority of the Jewish code is shown in the production of such glorious men as Isaiah and Daniel. But the great point which we have to remember is that we may be as good, not only as Buddha or Socrates, but even as Isaiah or Daniel, and yet not be truly and distinctively " Christian." When we have realized all that these great saints did, the question still remains for the humblest Christian, " What do ye extra ? " Even the Ten Commandments, so superior to any Gentile code, are shown in the very discourse from which our text is taken to fall immeasurably short of the ethical standard of real Christianity. They fall short in two respects. First of all, they do not exhibit the inwardness of Christianity. In our code, to look after a woman lustfully or to think of a man murderously is to break the Law. Outward obedience does not suffice. The very thoughts of our hearts must be cleansed and brought into obedience to the captivity of Christ. Again, the Ten Commandments fall short of the outwardness of Christianity, because Christianity applies its moral precepts not only to our own kith and kin, but also to the entire human race. It is from the standpoint we have now reached that our Lord's extraordinary conversation 12 THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. with the rich young ruler becomes intelligible. That gifted and devout young man had kept all the Jewish commandments from his youth up, and yet he was con scious that he lacked something. Then Christ said to him, " If thou wilt be perfect ; " that is to say, if he wished not only to attain the highest Jewish goodness, but also to be a true Christian, a real disciple of Jesus Christ, he must do something which the Ten Commandments did not demand of him, and which, I may add, is not found in any ethical code except that which Christ taught and practised. Now, what is this "extra"? What is the differentia, the distinctive note of Christianity? The plain answer is found where we should have expected to find it — in the writings of S. John. Addressing His disciples on the eve of the Crucifixion, Jesus Christ said, "A new commandment I give unto you." Ah ! our long quest is about to succeed. Now we shall obtain an answer to the inquiry we have so often made. A " new " commandment ; a commandment such as never fell from the lips of a great ethical leader before ; a commandment in the teaching neither of Buddha, nor of Socrates, nor of Moses, nor of Isaiah. What is it ? Let us continue the quotation : "A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another." That is not new ! Love, pure, sweet, heavenly love, has existed in all lands from the very beginning. But we have not quite finished the quotation. Let us complete and ponder that great utterance : "A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another, even as I loved you." x Ah ! the great secret is out at last ! To be like Christ — to love men as Christ loved them — that is Christianity, 1 John xiii. 34. THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. 1 3 and only that. Now I can understand a remark which I heard some years ago in Scotland, and which perplexed me at the time. Referring to an earnest and distinguished Christian, one said, " He is a very good man, but somehow or other he does not remind me of Christ." I thought, " How strange ! How can he be very good without re minding men of Christ? " I understand it now. He might have reminded them of Buddha, or Socrates, or Isaiah, or Daniel, but he did not remind them of Christ because his life was not an incarnation of disinterested, all-embracing love. So we come back once more to the conclusion we have often reached and as often forgotten — a real Christian is a Christ-like man. Now, you call and profess yourself a Christian ? If a religious census were tolerated in this country you would unhesitatingly enter yourself "a Christian"? What proof do you give of your Christianity ? You pay twenty shillings in the pound? I am very glad to hear it. There are some who call themselves Christians and do not. You live a sober, chaste, and industrious life ? So did Buddha. You tell the truth and are strictly honourable ? Socrates might say the same. You go to the house of God, read your Bible, say your prayers? So did Daniel. You observe all the rites and ceremonies of your faith ? So does the devout Mahometan. You give one-tenth and more of your goods to the service of God ? That is most gratifying, for there is nothing that the conventional Christian neglects so much. But in this respect you are no better than the Pharisee. When you have exhausted the entire category of ordinary virtue the question still remains, " What do ye extra ? " Jews and Gentiles have done all these things, done them 14 THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. honestly and devoutly. You have not yet given any evidence whatever of real Christianity. Let me put to you a decisive question: "Are you in any degree like Christ ? " That is impossible as an habitual fact, unless you at least study His words and His life as keenly as a man of business studies trade returns, and as a politician studies the speeches of his political leader. Further, if you are to be a true Christian, you must accept Christ as your Teacher. You must acknowledge His infallible authority. You must apply His principles of conduct to every phase and aspect of life — to business, to pleasure, and to politics, as well as to prayer-meetings and sacraments. Once more, you must accept Him as your Teacher in the highest sense by making Him your Model. It has been well stated that Christianity does not say to us, " Sit and be convinced," but "Arise and walk." Christ does not undertake to satisfy our intellectual curiosity, but to direct our moral conduct, And unless we practise His moral teaching as far and as promptly as we apprehend it, we shall cease to understand it, and the light within us will become darkness. In a word, if you are to be a true Christian, you must place yourself unreservedly in the hands of Christ. To use His own striking and pregnant phrase, you must "abide" in Him "as the branch abides in the vine." With man this is admittedly impossible. But " with God all things are possible." This Great Renunciation, this unreserved and absolute self-surrender to Christ, is the very essence of true Christianity. Until we intelligently and heartily accept Him as our infallible Teacher, our all-sufficient Priest, our authoritative King, our very Life, we are Christians only in name and possibility. It is because there are so few Christ-like Christians that, THE CHRISTIAN EXTRA. 1 5 the majority of every nation in the civilized world is outside the Christian Church. This is why Christianity is almost stationary at home and abroad. What we want above everything is a few Christ-like Christians. I say " a few," because it is unreasonable to hope for very many at once, although all ought to possess the Christian " extra." But a few would save the Church. As Dr. Newman pointed out in one of the most famous of his university sermons, the real work of Christianity has in all ages been done by the few. John Wesley expressed the same great truth in memorable words when he said, " Ten true Christians would change the face of England." He meant ten thorough going Christians, ten Christ-like Christians, ten men or women animated by the Christian " extra." Will you be one of the ten? It is an old Latin proverb that no one becomes very wicked suddenly. It is equally true that no one becomes very good suddenly. The sinner may be converted suddenly, as I myself have witnessed a thousand times. But a convert does not apprehend the Christian " extra " at once. I appeal, therefore, specially to those who have already repented of sin and trusted in Christ, and had some experience of the love of God. You are ready for the further and fuller consecration, for the higher and better life. Will you accept it now ? Will you so give yourself up to Christ, that His spirit may reproduce in you the Christ-like "extra" — that disinterested, absolute, self- sacrificing, suffering, all-embracing love, which is the highest attribute of God, and the distinctive mark of the Christianity of Christ ? THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. ' ' Shall we never listen to the words of these wisest of men ? Then listen at least to the words of your children — let us in the lips of babes and sucklings find our strength ; and see that we do not make them mock instead of pray, when we teach them, night and morning, to ask for what we believe never can be granted ; — that the will of the Father, — which is, that His creatures may be righteous and happy, — should be done on earth, as it is in heaven." — Ruskin. C— 4 THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. " Thy will be done, as in heaven, so on earth." — Matt. vi. 10. The text is taken from what is called " The Lord's Prayer." But that is somewhat of a misnomer. The Lord's Prayer is really found in the incomparable and unapproachable seven teenth chapter of the Gospel according to S. John. The prayer before us is the Lord's Prayer only in the sense that it was taught by the Lord. Various attempts have been made to derive it from the Zendavesta on the one hand, and from the synagogue prayer-book on the other. But all these attempts have failed. There is no doubt that it is an absolutely original and unique composition of our Lord Jesus Christ, and so may be called His prayer. But it was intended for our use, and is appropriate for our lips and not for His own. This prayer has certainly been more frequently used than any other since the Christian era began. You and I have repeated it a thousand times. I greatly fear it has become a vain repetition. ", Too much familiarity with it has blinded our minds to its meaning, and deadened our con sciences to its moral. Who of us really understands the petition I have just read ? Who of us honestly desires its fulfilment ? In the first place, it teaches us the real aim of life — to 20 THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. do the will of the Father. The most painful feature of the lives of most men is their aimlessness. They drift to and fro with the social current as seaweed drifts with the tide. This is, I fear, especially the case with those among us who are most privileged, and who are not under the blessed necessity of toiling for their daily bread. Have you ever gone into the Park at the height of the season and watched those weary faces ? I believe that the reason why so many of the wealthy and titled plunge into all the follies and miseries of gambling is because they are at their wits' end to "kill time," to destroy the intolerable ennui of their aimless existence. Who that has a real purpose in life cares to waste hours at the gaming-table ? But it is to be feared that the great majority both of rich and poor have no definite purpose here. Some of you will recall the poetry of unusual earnestness and loftiness with which Matthew Arnold was inspired when he visited the chapel at Rugby and remembered his noble father — " What is the course of the life Of mortal men on the earth ?— Most men eddy about Here and there — eat and drink, Chatter and love and hate, Gather and squander, are raised Aloft, are huii'd in the dust, Striving blindly, achieving Nothing ; and no one asks Who or what they have been, More than he asks what waves In the moonlit solitudes wild Of the midmost ocean have swell'd, Foam'd for a moment, and gone. ' ' And there are some, whom a thirst Ardent, unquenchable, fires, Not with the crowd to be spent, THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. 21 Not without aim to go round In an eddy of purposeless dust, Effort unmeaning and vain. Ah yes, some of us strive Not without action to die Fruitless, but something to snatch From dull oblivion, not all Glut the devouring grave ! We, we have chosen our path — Path to a clear-purposed goal." To which class do you belong ? Are you in the number of those who spend their time in " Striving blindly, achieving Nothing " ? Are you one of the crowd who "... without aim ... go round In an eddy of purposeless dust, Effort unmeaning and vain ; or are you one of the noble few who strive "Not without action to die Fruitless," who have chosen a path, a " Path to a clear-purposed goal " ? The text teaches us that the "clear-purposed goal" of the Christian is to do the will of the Father. Christ was the Ideal Man, and the whole object of His existence was to reach that goal. "My meat," he exclaimed, "is to do the will of Him that sent Me." ' And again, " I seek not Mine own will, but the will of Him that sent Me." 2 And again, " I am come down from heaven, not to do Mine own will, but the will of Him that sent Me. And this is the will of 1 John iv. 34. z John v. 30. 22 THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. Him that sent Me, that of all that which He hath given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day." ' You remember how at the crisis of His life he cried, " O My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass away from Me : nevertheless not as I will, but as Thou wilt." 2 That bitter cry is a proof that it is not always easy and pleasant even for innocence itself to do "the will of God." Therefore if you sometimes find it hard and even dreadful to tread your way to this goal, you are only repeating the experience of Christ. Like Him you shall be made " perfect through suffering." But as a rule the healthy Christian, like Christ, "delights" to do "the will of God." Mark that phrase, " the will of God." We are here to do " the will " of God, not merely to obey " the law " of God. " The will of God " is necessarily very different from " the law of God." Even the Ten Commandments are a most imperfect expression of " the will of God." " The letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life." Law is necessarily expressed in general terms and in human speech. General terms never exactly suit every particular case, and human language has its inevitable limitations. Hence the old judicial proverb that the highest law is sometimes the highest injury. The strict letter of the law does occasionally frustrate the very purpose of the Lawgiver. Our Lord proved that again and again in relation to the sabbatic law. The terrible blunder of the Pharisees was to confound the "law of God" with the "will of God," whereas Christ ever interpreted the "law" in harmony with the "will." You remember how in relation to the literal observation of the sabbatic law, when the literal observation became a moral violation, Christ said, " Is not a man better than a sheep ? " and with that one 1 John vi. 38, 39. 2 Matt. xxvi. 39. THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. 23 question swept away all the cobwebs of interpretation by which the Jewish authorities had made the sabbatic law inconsistent with the goodness and mercy of God. Precisely the same ethical principle must be remembered in discussing the temperance question of our own day. Nothing could indicate a more profound ignorance of the real spirit of the New Testament than an attempt to justify the use of alcoholic liquors because, forsooth, it is possible that Christ drank intoxicating wine at the marriage feast in Cana ! What, in the name of common sense, to say nothing of scriptural morality, has that to do with it? We are no more required to imitate Jesus Christ literally in that respect than we are required to wear a turban and sandals because He undoubtedly wore them. To argue like that is to abandon the intelligent and humane morality of the Christian religion for the absurd literalism and inhumanity of the Pharisaic code. We might say again with Christ, "Is not a man better than a sheep? "or yet more perti nently, " Is it lawful to do good or to do harm, to save life or to kill ? " Our conduct in relation to the temperance movement and every other must be determined by the great principles of Christian humanity, and not by miserable wrangles over the meaning of words, or the personal habits of our blessed Redeemer under totally different social conditions. But I refer to this question now simply as a modem illustration of the immense difference between every kind of narrow literalism and a rational loyalty to " the will of God." Even when we are dealing with the Ten Command ments, we must remember, as I have already said, that they are a most inadequate expression of the will of God. Our Lord pointed that out again and again, especially in the 24 THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. Sermon on the Mount, where He shows specifically that the law against murder and the law against adultery fall im measurably short of the requirements of ethical Christianity. Reflecting on these facts, I increasingly doubt the wisdom of printing the Ten Commandments above the communion table in our sanctuaries. It tends to drag down the Christian code to the level of Judaism. Would to God that every one who professes and calls himself a Christian honestly kept the Ten Commandments ! It would be a great improvement on the existing situation. But, as a matter of fact, it is a very doubtful procedure to introduce the Ten Commandments into the Christian sanctuary. God requires of us a great deal more than He required of the Jews thousands of years ago, and there is some danger that the young and inexperienced should imagine that the Ten Commandments embody the ethical code of the Christian faith. This objection becomes even more weighty when we notice that the prayer which Christ has put into, our mouths refers not to the will of "God," but to the will of the " Father." We have not to do the will of the Creator. That belongs to the Gentile code. We have not to do the will of the Judge. That belongs to the Jewish code. We are called to do the will of the Father. That is the Christian code. In our sanctuaries a disobedient man is regarded not as a disloyal creature, or as a law-breaking citizen, but as a prodigal son. The profound and miserable error of the elder brother in the well-known parable was to regard himself as one simply bound to keep the " commandment " of his father, and under no obligation to do his father's " will." The true explanation of his hard-heartedness comes out in the words, "Lo, these many years have I served THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. 2 5 thee, and I never transgressed a commandment of thine." When a son begins to talk not about the " will " of his father, but about the " commandments " of his father, he has already ceased to be a son in spirit ; he has lost the filial attitude, and may well talk about " serving." For a servant he is, and no longer a son. It is to be feared that a great part of Christendom is still at the inferior Jewish level. We are too apt to think of God as a Master whose commandments we have to keep under threats of penalties. We do not realize that Christ has taught us in this very prayer to think of God as a Father whose will it is our noble and glorious privilege to do. And yet the language of the Lord's Prayer teaches us as emphatically as language can teach that the one divine goal of the Christian life is to do the will of the Father. In the second place, the petition we are pondering teaches us that this " will " is to be done " on earth." Not in heaven, but on earth, here and now. Perhaps the most fatal delusion that ever took possession of the Christian Church was the delusion that the will of God cannot be done on earth, that the Christian ideal is too high for attainment here, that the programme which God has given us must somehow or other be explained away. When the first gush of love and enthusiasm began to ebb in the hearts of men, the idea grew up that obedience to the will of the Father was impossible in ordinary life ; and it was assumed that it could be rendered only in the artificial life of a monastery. When that broke down, it was assumed that it could be accomplished only in the loneliness of a hermit's cell. When the Reformation took place, our fore fathers were much too well acquainted with ecclesiastical history to be victimized by the old delusion that men or 26 THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. women could live the ideal Christian life in a monastery or a nunnery or a lonely cell, better than in ordinary society. As a matter of fact, the purely artificial life of those monastic institutions was less moral and less satisfactory even than the conduct of average Christians in the ordinary relations of society. The Reformers, deprived of that method of explaining away Christianity, found relief in another direction. They positively transported the sphere of ideal obedience into another world altogether ! So it came to pass that both Catholics and Protestants concluded Christianity was too good for this world ! Catholics, however, assumed that the ideal life might be led in monasteries or in solitary cells, but Protestants taught that the Christian life was pos sible only in Paradise. They boldly expelled Christ-like Christianity from this planet ! They argued vehemently that man must sin, and Luther went so far as to contend that a certain amount of sin was an advantage because it taught men humility ! The two extremes, both Catholic and Protestant, were due to the delusion which they shared, that Christianity was too good for this world. They said in effect, "We cannot do the will of God on earth in the ordinary relations of life;" and the one added that it might be done in monasteries and nunneries, and the other asserted that it was possible only in Paradise. Yet all this time they alike repeated the words, " Thy will be done, as in heaven, so on earth." By our traditions on this subject, both Catholic and Protestant, we have explained away the New Testament as completely as the Pharisees explained away the Old Testament. For example, S. Paul, writing to the Corinthians, says, " Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. 27 the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love Him."1 The ordinary modern Christian imagines without hesitation that this passage refers to heaven. I have often heard it quoted in prayer and in the pulpit in relation to heaven. But anybody who reads it with his eyes open will see that S. Paul is referring not to Christian experience in another world, but to Christian experience in this world, even in licentious Corinth itself. But the most striking illustration of the strange perver sion of Scripture now under our notice, is found in the last chapters of the last book of the New Testament. In the last two chapters of the Revelation, S. John describes the city of God. How many thousands of sermons have been preached about the city of God, and, so far as I know, in almost every instance it has been assumed that it is the city of heaven, and that S. John is describing what will take place on the other side of the river of death in the Great Hereafter ! Yet, in speaking of the city, S. John describes it as "coming down out of heaven from God." It would be impossible for him to declare more emphatically that he is speaking, not of heaven, but of earth ; not of some mysterious place in another world, but of London, of what London ought to be, and what London will be when her citizens are Christians. The " great voice out of the throne" exclaimed, "Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men," 2 and we read that " the kings of the earth do bring their glory"3 into this city. But we have made the Word of God of none effect by our traditions. We have perverted the most obvious statements of Scrip ture until the book has lost much of its interest for the busy masses of men. This is the most dangerous form that 1 1 Cor. ii. 9. 2 Rev. xxi. 3. Ibid. 24. 28 THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. our " other-worldliness " has taken. We have deadened our consciences and paralyzed our energies by explaining away passages that refer to this present life, and by comfortably assuming that they describe what heaven is and not what earth ought to be. What more startling illustration of this could we have than the Lord's Prayer itself, which, strange to say, from beginning to end, makes no request whatever about heaven ! If our only life were the life on earth, every petition of the Lord's Prayer would still be appropriate for our lips. When Christ responded to the earnest request of His disciples that He would teach them how to pray, He gave them this brief and comprehensive litany. But, observe, He did not instruct them to offer one single petition in relation to heaven. He concentrated all their thoughts and all their requests upon the duties and privileges of this present life, and upon the necessity of doing the will of our Father " on earth." In the third and last place, He teaches us in the text how the will of the Father is to be done — " as in heaven." That is to say, it is to be done on earth always, everywhere, by everybody. Mr. Herbert Spencer is quite right in his state ment that we have at present two religions in this country. One which we derive from the Old and New Testaments, and one which we learn from the Greek and Latin authors. One which for the most part we only " believe that we believe," and the other which we do unmistakably believe. One which we profess on Sunday, the other which we diligently practise during the rest of the week. Nothing is more curious than the way in which men seem to divide their lives into water-tight compartments like the different sections of great steamers, so that one part of their nature THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. 29 has no connection whatever with another part. The singular story of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is founded upon a great psychological truth. Most men live double lives, and this duplicity is summed up in two leading particulars. First of all, how often do we hear sincerely religious men say that "religion is religion and business is business"! By which they mean that the principles they profess on Sunday are not applicable to the details of their business life on Monday. We may be sure that if Jesus Christ had to address the good men who do not apply their Christian principles in the City and in the West End, He would speak to them in some such terms as these : " Ye generation of vipers, how shall ye escape the damnation of hell ? " This attempt to establish a kind of water-tight compartment, in which under the stress of modern competition we are to do a hundred things inconsistent with Christianity, is as diametrically opposed to the spirit of Jesus Christ as it is fatal to the well-being of mankind. We can never be said to do the Will of our - Father on earth as angels do it in heaven, if we do that Will only at certain times and in certain places. Ruskin is quite right in stating that if our religion is good for anything it is good for everything. The second way in which some very imperfectly in structed Christians contradict the Lord's Prayer, is by asserting that " religion has nothing to do with politics." They try to construct a political as well as a commercial water-tight compartment. That is the reason why the man hood of Europe has been alienated from the Christian religion. A profound instinct has taught the masses of the people that if Christianity is not applicable to politics, Christianity is an antiquated delusion. Principles which cannot be obeyed by Society as well as the Individual are 30 THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. obviously so imperfect and so unsatisfactory, that the sooner we are rid of them the better. The distinction which is so commonly made between secular and sacred is a deadly anti-Christian delusion. There is not a single passage in the New Testament which justifies a man in acting upon different principles on Sunday and on Monday. The petition which we are now considering, and which Christ has put into every Christian mouth, compels us to acknow ledge that there is only one rule for the Christian under all circumstances, and that he is under a divine obligation to act upon Christian motives and considerations in business, in pleasure, and in politics, as well as in prayer-meetings and at sacramental services. Have you ever realized how far S. John has carried this secular conception of the Christian programme? In the ideal picture of the city of God he actually exclaims, " I saw no temple therein." x Think of it ! A Jew said that. A Jew who had been accustomed to regard the temple as the very heart and centre and crown of his own great city. But in the ideal city of God to be erected on earth, John saw " no temple." Religion, which in olden times had been restricted to certain places and certain days, and certain occasions and certain ceremonies, had in that glorious vision become so extended and pervasive and all- embracing, that there was no special building for divine worship. But every house was a house of prayer ; and in these houses, consecrated to God, the men were virtuous, the women brave, and the children happy. It would have been impossible for a Jew to bring home to us so vividly in any other way his own deep sense of the fact that the Christian religion was to be a religion of common 1 Rev. xxi. 22. THE CHRISTIAN PROGRAMME. 3 1 life, and that its greatest triumphs were to be won, not in far-off regions where sin had never wrought its fearful havoc, but on the very spot where evil had once triumphed. The ideal of the eternal love of God is to be attained in the very world where Satan tempted, where man sinned, and where Christ died. The will of the Father is already done by angels in heaven. The Lord's Prayer is a pro phecy and a promise that it shall yet be done on earth. THE CHRISTIAN IMAGINATION. " The virtue of the Imagination is its reaching, by intuition and intensity of gaze (not by reasoning, but by its authoritative opening and revealing power), a more essential truth than is seen at the surface of things. ... It has no food, no delight, no care, no perception, except of truth ; it is for ever looking under masks, and burning up mists ; no fairness of form, no majesty of seeming, will satisfy it ; the first condition of its existence is incapability of being deceived." — Ruskin. r>— 4 THE CHRISTIAN IMAGINATION. "Your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams." — Acts ii. 17. These words from the pen of the Prophet Joel were declared by S. Peter to refer to the Christian era, which was finally inaugurated on the Day of Pentecost. The marked characteristic of this era is that those who promote and represent it have visions and dreams of an ideal state of happiness unattained but attainable. Instead of accepting the existing situation as unchangeable, instead of submitting to evil as inevitable, Christian men have visions and dreams of a Golden Age in which sin and evil and sorrow shall be no more. It has often been remarked that one of the most striking differences between Christianity and the classical religions of the south of Europe which it superseded, is that they placed their Golden Age in the dim and receding past, but Christianity places its Golden Age in the bright and advancing future. Some years ago Professor Tyndall delivered a remark able address on the use of Imagination in Science. He showed that this great faculty of the soul was simply invalu able in a sphere of thought where superficial minds would suppose there was no scope for its exercise. If I remember rightly, one of his illustrations was the Luminiferous Ether 36 THE CHRISTIAN IMAGINATION. which no one has ever seen, or heard, or felt, which is a pure conception of the Scientific Imagination, but which is now assumed to be a fact because its hypothetical existence explains the phenomena of colour more fully and more perfectly than they have ever been explained before. Ruskin has in noble passages descanted on the use of the Imagination in Art. In his vocabulary as in that of Professor Tyndall the word is redeemed from all low meanings. It represents not mere and groundless imagin ings, but ultimate realities. Students of Wordsworth will remember that great poet's description of unimaginative Peter Bell— _ "A primrose on the river's brim * A yellow primrose was to him, And nothing more." Whereas to the imagination of Wordsworth even the humblest flower discloses " Thoughts too deep for tears." Indeed, it may be said that artists have two divine func tions. The work of painters, poets, sculptors, musicians is first of all to reveal to us the hidden meanings and beauties of all that is— the Actual. As that great artist Browning has so finely said — " Art was given for that ; God uses us to help each other so, Lending our minds out. . . . This world's no blot for us, Nor blank ; it means intensely, and means good : To find its meaning is my meat and drink." But artists have an even nobler function. It is the mission of the greatest and best of them, secondly, to reveal the glory and blessedness of that which may be— the Attainable. Now the faculty of the soul which apprehends the Beatific THE CHRISTIAN IMAGINATION. 37 Vision both of the Actual and of the Attainable, is the Imagination. This great faculty reaches its maturity and achieves its noblest deeds in the service of religion, when purified and illuminated by the Holy Spirit. Then it sees visions and dreams dreams of " whatsoever things God prepared for them that love Him." x My theme, therefore, is the use of the Imagination in Religion, where its services are even greater and more necessary than in the spheres of Science and of Art. It is to this faculty of the soul that the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews refers in his famous eleventh chapter. You will observe that he there defines faith to be " the essence of things hoped for, the proving of things not seen." That is a very comprehensive and abstract definition which includes a great deal more than saving Christian faith. I trust you all know full well that saving Christian faith is a personal trust in a personal Saviour. But this writer gives us a much wider and more general definition of faith. " Faith " in his vocabulary expresses what I call "Imagination," the realizing of "things hoped for" and "things not seen," the Attainable and the Actual. It was this Imagination which enabled the great saints whom he marshalls before us to do their mighty deeds. Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, and all the prophets "saw visions and dreamed dreams." They were not deceived and paralyzed by " the things which are seen and temporal." With the eye of Faith or Imagination they saw "the things that are unseen and eternal," and in the strength of that Beatific Vision they accomplished gigantic moral revolu tions which lifted the whole human race to higher levels of goodness and of happiness. The men of the Christian era 1 1 Cor. ii. 9. 38 THE CHRISTIAN IMAGINATION. and their great Master possessed this faculty of Imagination in the highest degree. S. Peter, in his Second Epistle, had a vivid and overwhelming vision of "new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness." 1 He imagined this world, and even heaven itself, renewed, exalted, beati fied ! S. Paul, again, dreamed dreams of the glorious Golden Age when " in the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things on earth, and things under the earth."2 His fearless and irresistible imagination traversed the whole universe of God, and imagined it all subject to the sway of Jesus Christ. I need not enlarge upon the presence and exercise of this quality in S. John. His apocalyptic vision of the earthly City of God closes and crowns the Revelation. But it may be necessary to remind you that this great faculty existed in the most vigorous and vivid form in the Master Himself. When the seventy evangelists returned with their artless story of spiritual triumph, His eyes flashed and He exclaimed, " I beheld Satan fallen as lightning from heaven." s His imagination was so alert and so penetrating, that in the first feeble triumphs of His emis saries He saw the promise and potency of the restitution of all things. Again, certain Greeks came to one of His disciples and said, " Sir, we would see Jesus." When that request was conveyed to( Him He exclaimed exultingly, " Now is the judgment of this world : now shall the prince of this world be cast out." 4 To His lofty imagination that little group of obscure Greeks was the advance guard of the southern races of Europe, of the Teutonic tribes, of the great Churches of our own time, and of the greater Churches not yet born. Christ, indeed, lived habitually in 1 2 Pet. iii. 13. 2 Phil. ii. 10. * Luke x. 18. * John xii. 31. THE CHRISTIAN IMAGINATION. 39 the Unseen. He realized always that Great Future when His disciples would sit upon twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel, and when all the Gentiles would be subject to His sway. There is nothing which ordinary Christians lack so much as this inspired Imagination. They do not see visions. They do not dream dreams. You and I have probably been too hard upon them. They have not lacked, as we have been tempted to believe and say, religion or faith, but — imagination. We have been indignant and angry at their parochial ideas, at their grovelling hopes, at their small satisfactions, at their dwarfish ambitions. But they have not been unreal or unbelieving. Their dull, undeveloped souls have not realized the divine possibilities. There are human moles that burrow and grope in the darkness of narrow boundaries, of subterranean passages ; and there are human eagles that spurn the low earth and soar aloft into the bright sunlight. Only eagles can see the vast horizon of life and beauty. Are you a mole or an eagle? Do you belong to the class of Christians whose imaginations have never been roused and exalted by God, or to those who see visions and dream dreams of glorious spiritual victories ? The ordinary Christian, with his unsanctified imagination, is not perturbed by a half-empty sanctuary, or by a Christian Church that is more dead than alive. He has no enterprise. He has no enthusiasm. He holds that as it was in the beginning, or is now, so it must be for ever and for ever. He is indignant with his brother-Christian whose imagina tion enables him to realize a spiritual prosperity yet un- attained. The imaginative Christian sees the sanctuary crowded with healthy, happy, united Christians. He sees 40 THE CHRISTIAN IMAGINATION. all the great revivals and spiritual miracles of the past repeated under his eyes. The unimaginative Christian is affronted by such visions. He regards the man who cherishes them as a dangerous " visionary," a foolish " fanatic," a reckless " enthusiast." The real difference between these two men is not that one is a Christian and that the other is not; but that one has the eyes of his imagination opened, while the other is still blind. Again, in civic life the ordinary Christian citizen is well satisfied if he discharges his own commonplace duties to the rate-collector and to the municipal authorities. But the Christian citizen whose imagination is inspired of God dreams of social changes which would make it as easy for his fellow-citizens to do right as it now is for them to do wrong. What a dream of social reform has come to General Booth in his old age ! That veteran of the faith imagines social arrangements which will abolish pauperism, and all the world wonders. There is no sphere of life in which there is more scope for the imagination than in civic life. Only at present there is no sphere in which it is so little exercised. Nothing could be more dull, narrow, and brutish than the ordinary conception of municipal life in our great towns. Only here and there do municipal authorities begin to realize how much could easily and cheaply be done to beautify life, to ennoble it, to instruct and inspire it; and, on the other hand, to repress both hideousness and vileness. Some day, Christians will see visions and dream dreams of a noble and glorious citizenship. Then the voice of com plaining will no longer be heard in our streets. When we rise to the sphere of patriotic or national life we find the noblest scope for the Christian imagination. The real patriot is ever dreaming of the good time when THE CHRISTIAN IMAGINATION. 41 men will dwell together in peace and brotherly love. Think of the glorious vision of peace which came to Isaiah ! He dreamed of the nations " beating their swords into plough shares, and their spears into pruning-hooks," and not even " learning war any more." The dull, stupid man of the world says that war is "inevitable." This ignoble sentiment is not due to the fact that he is bloodthirsty, but to the degraded condition of his imagination, which has never been roused by the touch of the finger of God. O, how shall we kindle the imaginations of men ! Nothing is so much needed to redeem life from its small- ness, its narrowness, its abject impotence. Read Isaiah, read the Revelation, read the four Lives of Christ, and first of all realize this very hour what Christ can do for you. Young men ! see visions of a noble and beneficent career ! Old men ! dream dreams of a life not wholly lost, of much that may yet be done for God and for humanity ! How glorious it is when young and old thus combine in anticipating, and therefore in promoting, the Kingdom of God which shall yet be established upon earth ! How delightful when the daring and ardent vision of youth is corrected and extended by the peaceful and serene dream of old age ! Every one, at every period of life, may cherish the Beatific Vision of the Christian world, the " new earth " that is to be. Only so shall we rise above the tyranny of the past and the despair of the present. Things are not as they seem. Ancient evils are already tottering to their fall. "The Lord God Omnipotent reigneth." Nothing is too hard for Him. The only real hindrance to the progress of His kingdom is to be found in the narrowness of our thoughts and in the parochial smallness of our enterprises. Only let us emulate the sublime faith and 42 THE CHRISTIAN IMAGINATION. the inspired imagination of the great men who founded the Baptist Missionary Society. Let us, like them, "ask for great things," and "expect great things." According to our divinely inspired Imagination it shall be done unto us. THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY. " What are you doing in God's fair Earth and Task-garden ; where whosoever is not working is begging or stealing?" — Carlyle. THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY. " After a long time the lord of those servants cometh, and maketh a reckoning with them." — Matt. xxv. 19. The parable of the Talents has made so deep an impression upon the English conscience that it has added a new word to the English language. We speak of " a talented man," or of "a man of talent," by which we mean one possessing some special ability. It is obvious that in these familiar expressions the word "talent" has lost its original meaning, and has acquired a parabolic meaning as some special endowment. But although we have naturalized the word in this parabolic sense, it is not the correct parabolic sense. That is to say, it does not convey as it ought to convey an idea of special responsibility for the use or neglect of special endowments. The employment of this word is a striking evidence, as I have said, of the impression which the parable of the Talents has made upon the English mind. But the erroneous sense in which it is employed indicates that the parable is not yet commonly understood. This is much to be regretted as there is nothing which the modern Englishman needs to realize more carefully or more deeply than the essential warning of this parable — the warning which is expressed in the text. 46 THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY. The framework of the parable before us is furnished by a familiar custom of men of property in ancient times. When they went away from home it was their habit to leave their property in the hands of their servants, or rather their slaves, who represented every occupation of life. Some of these slaves were merchants, some were mechanics and artisans, some were professional men, and some were farmers. Now, the owner in the case before us distributed his wealth among his slaves, "to each according to his several ability ; " that is to say, to each according to the ability which " severed " or distinguished him from his fellow-slaves. In this sense the statement in the American Declaration of Independence is profoundly true, "All men are born free and equal." They are free and also " equal" in the sense that each receives " talents" appropriate to his " ability." In another sense they are not " equal," for we come into the world with an incal culable variety of abilities. The abilities with which we are naturally endowed may be classified in various ways. Perhaps there is no better method of classification than that which distributes them according to our threefold nature. We have physical ability, mental ability, and spiritual ability. Men come into this world with great varieties of physical ability. Physical ability itself is twofold — muscular and nervous. The muscular strength of our bodies, as we know, varies very much. Some are exceedingly strong, have never an ache or a pain, and are capable of pro digious efforts. Others are scarcely able to make any physical effort whatever. Again, the nervous system is quite distinct from the muscular, and does not necessarily vary with it. Some who have a comparatively weak THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY. 47 muscular development have a magnificent nervous system. On the other hand, some muscular giants are of a low and coarse nervous type. Secondly, we are endowed with great varieties of mental ability. Some men are literary, some are artistic, some are scientific, some have a great aptitude for business, and others are evidently called to play a distinguished part in politics or public affairs. Again, it is equally evident, however much it may shock some antiquated notions, that our spiritual ability varies greatly. Some persons are much more amiable than others, and find it very much easier to keep their tempers and to treat every one with kindness. We may even go further, and say that some persons are by nature much more spiritually-minded than others. The devotional side of life comes more easily and more naturally to some of us than to others. Now, the great Master teaches in the parable before us that He distributes talents, whatever they are — we shall see presently — to each of us "according to our several ability." It does, indeed, often seem to us that a round peg is put into a square hole, and that it is the exception rather than the rule to have " the right man in the right place." But we must believe, on the authority of this parable, that for the highest of all ends our Lord overrules all things, so that every man has the " talents " of which he can, at present and under existing circumstances, make the best use. Please to observe the limitations in that statement — "at present" and "under existing circumstances." Not withstanding, therefore, the disadvantages of birth (which are now felt more keenly than ever), and the fact that in this sense " all men are " not " born equal," we are justified in 4B THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY. drawing the optimistic conclusion that God in His overruling providence so orders our circumstances that every man, in this probationary life, does receive the " talents " which accord with his abilities physical, mental, and spiritual. But it is high time for us to ask, What are the " talents " thus distributed ? As I have already explained, in common speech we use the word in an obviously erroneous sense. " Talents " have come to be synonymous with "abilities." When we talk of " a man of talent," we mean a man of ability. But this is evidently a mistake, for in the parable before us we are told that God distributes to us talents according to our several ability. Hence, if the word " talents '' be understood to mean, as is commonly assumed, " ability," we should read God " distributes ability according to ability," which is absurd. No ! talents are not abilities. They are evidently the Opportunities with which the abilities do their work. I have just classified our abilities under three heads. We may now classify our talents or oppor tunities under four heads. There are four kinds of talents. First, Money. When we become the owners of wealth through no merit or effort of our own, we receive a great talent or opportunity. Even when we have done something ourselves to obtain wealth, and when we can honestly regard it as in some degree the reward of our own industry, the case is not so entirely different from inherited wealth as at first appears. When we penetrate beneath the surface of things, and inquire more particularly what are the circum stances which occasion the accumulation of wealth, we shall find that the millionaire who has apparently made his own money is much more indebted to the industry of his neigh bours and to favourable circumstances than he is to his own ability. Let him transport himself, like Alexander Selkirk, THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY. 49 to a solitary island, and try to make a fortune there. Then, when he has utterly failed, let him acknowledge that he owes even more to others than he does to himself for the money he has accumulated. Money,, both inherited and accumulated, is a great talent or opportunity. Nothing astonishes me more than the fact that so many rich men utterly fail to realize what an opportunity wealth gives them. They go on heaping up useless wealth with which to curse their children. As though the mere accumulation of money was in itself a great gain ! As though heaps of gold could protect them against all the ills to which flesh is heir ! I am very glad that one millionaire — Mr. Carnegie, of Pennsylvania — realizes that the best thing he can do with his money is to get rid of it, and that the worst thing possible would be to pile it upon the hapless heads of his children. There seems to be in some respects even less public spirit among the wealthy men of our own time than distinguished the heathen patricians of old Rome. They delighted to spend their wealth in dignifying and adorning that great city. It is exceedingly surprising to me that the immensely wealthy citizens of London do not use their millions to purify and to beautify this great capital. It is even more astonishing that those who profess and call themselves Christians toil on and slave on, adding money-bag to money-bag, instead of using this mighty instrument to facilitate and encourage the evangelization of mankind. Nearly every Christian and humanitarian organization is crippled for want of more adequate resources. One of the greatest evils of the time is the miserliness of the wealthy. They are preparing for their children an awful retribution. The bitter and almost implacable hatred ofthe wealthy, which is the most dangerous social symptom of modern Europe, is the direct result of e— 4 50 THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY. the awful way in which the wealthy have neglected to use their wealth for the public good. They are busily heaping up wealth, but they are also heaping up wrath against the day of wrath. They seem to have forgotten that wealth is a talent, an opportunity, a glorious opportunity of serving God by serving man. The second kind of talent or opportunity, is Rank. This, like Wealth, is not to be despised or under-estimated. If rightly used, it may be made a most potent instrument of human happiness. It is difficult to exaggerate what Rank could do in an ancient country like this if all who pos sessed it realized that it was a responsible opportunity. The third great talent is Education, now happily within the reach of many, destined soon to be within the reach of most, and ultimately of all. In some respects true Educa tion is a greater talent than either Wealth or Rank. It is a source of illimitable influence, and may be used as a mighty and almost irresistible weapon in the warfare against evil. There is one other kind of talent expressed by the sig nificant phrase, " Openings in life." These opportunities are not altogether reserved for either Wealth, or Rank, or Education, but in the mysterious providence of God come to most men — tides that suddenly flow, and which, " taken at the flood," lead on to highest service. Now, these four things, Money, Rank, Education, and " Openings in life," are the fulcrums of our levers, and tools with which we work. The purpose of God with respect to the distribution of these talents or opportunities is expressed in the famous maxim which more than anything else ex plained the triumph of the first Napoleon, " The tools to the man that can use them." I have already admitted that it does not always or even often seem that this is the rule. Talents, THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY. 51 or opportunities, not seldom appear to be given to the very man who cannot use them. But we are bound to conclude, on the authority of One " to whom all hearts are open, and all desires known," One who understands man better than man understands himself, that these talents or opportunities are after all distributed in the way which, if each man is faithful, will at present and under existing circumstances secure that they shall be best, because most effectively used for the general advance and well-being of the human race. The real reason why these talents or opportunities often appear to be given to the wrong person is because those to whom they are given do not improve them. Of that we have startling evidence in the remaining part of the parable. But first of all we deal with the case of the " good and faithful servant," the man who makes the best use of the oppor tunities which God has given him. Of him we read that he " went and traded with the talents, and made other five talents." That is to say, he made the very most of his talents ; not of one of them or of some of them, but of all of them. He lived up to his opportunities, and you will observe that we are told he did this " straightway " (ver. 16). That word is a happy improvement of the Revised Version upon the ambiguous " then " of the Authorized Version. " Straightway," that is, at once, without any delay, beginning early and working late. Whatever he might have achieved by desperate efforts in the later period of his life, it would have been impossible for him to make the best use of his talents if he had thrown away his youth and early manhood. Thank God, men may be "saved" at the very end of their life. But we dare not conceal from such persons that their late decision is a sorry business at best. They can never redeem the neglected opportunities. They can never gain 52 THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY. back the lost occasions of highest service. None are " good and faithful " in the best sense of the term except those who " straightway," from the very first and perseveringly, trade with the talents placed at their disposal. We come now to our text, where we read that " after a long time the lord of those servants cometh, and maketh a reckoning with them." Every one of us must stand before His judgment-seat, and there He will make a careful, deliberate, and exhaustive "reckoning" with us. He will inquire concerning our abilities. First, our physical abilities, what kind of bodies we had, and whether they possessed muscular ability or nervous ability, or both. Then He will inquire into the precise nature of our mental ability, whether it was literary, artistic, scientific, commercial, or political. Lastly, He will investigate our spiritual ability, considering whether we possessed any natural amiability or any special disposition to the more spiritual side of life. Having exhaustively "reckoned with" us respecting our abilities, He will inquire what were our talents, our opportunities of using those abilities. We shall have to give an account of every penny that ever passed through our fingers. Our position and influence in the social hierarchy will be care fully noted. The exact nature of our education will be the subject of investigation, whether we received an elementary, a secondary, or a university education. Then all the open ings in life that came to us will pass under review. Not one of them will be overlooked. Are you startled or shocked by this plain matter-of-fact statement ? Does it seem to you scarcely consistent with the dignity of that august tribunal ? Are you not rather the victim of your own sentimental mysticism ? Have you not been living in sftme theological cloudland of your own ,THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY. 53 invention? Pray consider the situation with becoming gravity, and tell me whether any other method of investi gation would be consistent with justice. There are the Abilities which distinguish one man from another. There are the Opportunities which in various ways are granted to us. Surely those are the Facts upon which the verdict of the Final Court will depend. And now, if you prove to be "a good and faithful servant," one who makes the most of his abilities and his opportunities, what will be your reward ? You will be invited to "enter into the joy of your Lord." And how will you enter into the joy of your Lord? By being "set over many things." His is the joy not of idleness, but of work. Heaven, thank God, is not a Palace of Indolence, but a hive of glorious industry; and the reward of worthy service will be not eternal self-indulgence, but larger responsibilities, wider spheres of usefulness, and greater opportunities' of making others happy. You will further observe that the servant who by trading made five talents into ten, and the other who made two talents into four, received precisely the same reward. This- is obviously just, for each was equally faithful according to his ability and opportunity. The sphere of work assigned to each in heaven will be according to his capacity. Every man having his most appropriate sphere, all will be equally happy. We must turn now to the slothful servant. It is a typical story. Listen to it. " Lord, I knew Thee that Thou art a hard man, reaping where Thou didst not sow, and gathering where Thou didst not scatter : and I was afraid, and went away, and hid Thy talent in the earth : lo, Thou hast Thine own."1 The unfaithful man is always full of 1 Vers. 24, 25. , 54 THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY. excuses. As is said in the truthful French proverb, " He who excuses himself, accuses himself." You will observe that he accuses his circumstances, his fellow-men, his God. According to his own miserable story every one is to blame except himself. See how God takes him at his word, and shatters his refuge of lies. " Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I did not scatter : thou oughtest therefore to have put My money to the bankers, and at My coming I should have received back Mine own with in terest."1 In other words, God at least expected His own with "usury," or rather "interest." If he had not the ability or opportunity to do as the others had done, and to employ his talents in trading, he might at any rate have deposited the money in a bank at interest. In other words, if any man is incapable of original and heroic service, he can at least join the Christian Church and do something under the direction of others. The fact that you are unable to do what John Wesley did is no reason why you should not do something. And now what was the punishment, the inevitable punishment, of the slothful servant ? First the loss of the talent which had been placed at his disposal. The oppor tunity of service was' taken away from him. And surely George Eliot was right when she said that there is nothing in human experience more dreadful than to think of oppor tunities of serving those we love that we have wantonly thrown away for ever. The second punishment is the " outer darkness," expressing the fact that he is self-exiled from the society of Christ, the service of Christ, and the happiness of Christ — the happiness of doing good. For 1 Vers. 26, 27. THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY. 55 him nothing remains except " the weeping and the gnashing of teeth." The weeping of speechless misery and the gnashing of teeth caused by the knowledge that his terrible fate is the result of his own deliberate folly and wickedness, It is self-inflicted. It is suicidal. No other is to blame for it. From first to last it is his own wilful and absolutely unnecessary act and deed. We are now in a position to sum up the solemn moral of this parable. It teaches us, as I said at the outset, our responsibility. No lesson could be more timely. As Mazzini reminded Europe half a century ago, we have heard enough of the Rights of man so fiercely an nounced at the French Revolution, it is time for us to realize the Duties of man. An eminent British statesman announced long since in Parliament that " property has its duties as well as its rights." He was speaking simply of property in land. But the parable before us teaches us that land is only one form of property. The healthy body, the intelligent mind, the spirit conscious of God, wealth, rank, education, openings in life, — all these things are also property to which is attached responsible duty, and for which every one of us shall give a strict account at the judgment-seat of Christ. These abilities and these oppor tunities are ours, not for self-assertion, or self-aggrandize ment, or self-indulgence, but for the service of man. Shakspere has taught in noble words that man is respon sible for the humane and gracious use of his great gifts. " What is a man, If his chief good, and market of his time, Be but to sleep and feed ? A beast, no more. Sure, He that made us with such large discoures, Looking before, and after, gave us not That capability and godlike reason To fust in us unused.' 56 ,^