I • Y.^LE«'¥]M]I¥IEIESninf • Gift of May Bishop Thompson and Louis Bennett Bishop THEOLOGY; EXPLAINED AND DEFENDED, IN A SERIES OF SERMONS; BY TIMOTHY DWIGHT, S. T. D. LL. D. LATE PRESIDENT OF YALE COLLEGE. WITH A MEMOIR op THE LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. IN FOUR VOLUMES. FIFTH EDITION. VOL. IV. jmW YORK ! G. & C. CARVILL, No. 108 BROADWAY. STEBEOTYPEB BX A. CHAKDLStl 1828, CONTENTS OF THE FOURTH VOLUME, Page SERMON CXXXII. The Tenth Commandment. Ambition.— Aom. xii. 16. 5 SERMON CXXXIII. Man's Inability to obey the Law of God.— Roi». viii. 7. 16 SERMON CXXXIV. Faith and Repentance necessary to restbre us to Obe dience.— jJcfs XX. 20, 21. . . . . - 27 SERMON CXXXV. The Means of Grace. The Ordinary Means of Grace. Proofs that there are such Means. — 1 Cor. iv. 15. - - - 38 SERMON CXXXVI. The Ordinary Meatis of Grace. What they are ; and what is their Influence. — 1 Cor, iv. 15. - - - - 49 SERMON CXXXVII. The Ordinary Means of Grace. Objections an swered 1 Cor, iv. 15. - - - 60 SERMON CXXXVIII. The Ordinary Means of Grace. Hearing the Word of God. — tuke viii. 18. ..... 75 SERMON CXXXIX. The Ordinary Means of Grace. The Nature, Seasons, and Obli^tions qf Prayer. — 1 Thess, v. 17. - - - - 86 SERMON CXL. The Ordinary Means of Grace. TikD-UaoCsdnocc .nfPrayer to Individuals. — \ Thess.v. IT. - - - ". :~--— »6. SERMON CXLI. The Ordinary Means of Grace. The Usefulness of Prayer to FamiUes. — Eph. vi. 10. - - - - 108 SERMON CXLII. The Ordinary Means of Grace. The Usefulness of Prayer to Communities. — Psalm Ixxiii. 28. ..... ^22 SERMON CXLIII. The Ordinary Means of Grace. The Objections to Prayer considered. — Job xxi. 15. ..... 134 SERMON CXLIV. The Ordinary Means of Grace. Forms of Prayer.— Matt. vi. 9—13. - 144 SERMON CXLV. The Ordinary Means of Grace. Intercourse with Reli gious Men. — Prov. xiii. 20. - - - . 157 SERMON CXLVI. The Ordinary Means of Grace. Religious Meditation.— Prov. iv. 26. - - - . . . . . 171 SERMON CXL VII. The Ordinai-y Means of Grace. The Duty of Educating Children religiously. Objections. — Prov. xxii. 6. - - . 182 SERMON CXLVIII. The Ordinary Means of Grace. The Manner in which Religions Education is to be conducted. Motives to this Duty. — Prov. xxii. 6. ... - - . . 193 SERMON CXLIX. The Extraordinary Means of Grace. The Character of Members of the Church. — 2 Cor. vi. 14. ... 2O6 SERMON CL. The Extraordinary Means of Grace. Officers of the Church. Ministers of the Gospel. Who are Ministers. — 1 Pe<. v, 1 — 3. - 221 SERMON CLI. The Extraordinary Means of Grace. Officers of the Church. Ministers of the Gospel. Who are Ministers. — 1 Pet. v. 1 — 3. - 233 SERMON CLII. The Extraordinary Means of Grace. The End, Nature, and Subjects of Preaching. — Matth. xxviii. 19. - . 246 SERMON CLIII. The Extraordinary Means of Grace. The Manner of Preaching. — Matlh, xxviii. 19. ..... 259 4 CONTENtS. Page SERMON CLIV. The Extraordinary Means of Grace. Various duties of Mimsters. — 1 Thess. iii. 2. - - - - . - 273 SERMON CLV. The Extraordinary Means of Gracc. Officers of the Church. Deacons. — .Sets vi. 1 — 6. - - . - - - 286 SERMON CLVL The Extraordinary Means of Grace. The Ordinances of the Church. Baptism. Its Reality and Intention. — Matth. xxviii. 19. 298 SERMON CLVII. The Extraordinary Means of Grace. The Objections against Infant Baptism answered. — Matth. xxviii. 19. - - 312 SERMON CLVIII. The Extraordinary Means of Grace. Direct Arguments for Infant Baptism.— Jlfa<(/j. xxviii. 19. .... 324 SERMON CLIX. The Extraordinary Means of Grace. No Infants but the Children of Believers, proper subjects of Baptism. Mode of Adminis tration.— .4c(s ii. 38, 39. ----- 333 SERMON CLX. The Extraordinary Means of Grace. The Lord's Supper ; Its Nature and Design. The QuaUfications of Communicants. — Mark xiv. 22—25. - ..... 355 SERMON CLXI. The Extraordinary Means of Grace. The Lord's Supper. Disposition with which it is to be attended ; and Motives to the Attend ance. — MarTc xiv. 22 — 25. ...... 370 SERMON CLXII., The Extraordi n^-y Mo.i.is 6r Qrace. The Discipline of tho oiiiirch. — Matlh. xviii. 15 — 18. ... sgs SERMON CLXIII. Death.— Pi. xc. 3. .... 403 SERMON CLXIV. The immediate Consequences of Death. — Eccl. xii. 7. 417 SERMON CLXV. The Remoter Consequences of Death. The Resurrec tion.— 1 Cor. XV. 16. - - ... 430 SERMON CLXVI. The Remoter Consequences of Death. The Final Judgment.— 2 Pet. in. 10. ... . . 443 SERMON CLXVII. The Remoter Consequences of Death. The Punishment of the Wicked. Its duration. — Matth. xxv. 46. - . 456 SERMON CLXVIII. The Remoter Consequences of Death. The Punish ment of the Wicked. Its Nature.— 2 Pet. ii. 12. ... 466 SERMON CLXIX. The Remoter Consequences of Death. The Rewards of the Righteous. The New Creation.— 2 Pet. iu. 13. - . - 477 SERMON CLXX. The Remoter Consequences of Death. The Happiness of Heaven. — Rev. xxi. 1 — 3. - - - - - 487 SERMON CLXXI. The Remoter Consequences of Death. The Happiness of Heaven. — Rev. xxi. 1 — 3. ...... 500 SERMON CLXXII. Conclusion. General Remarks. — Prov. viu. 6. - 513 SERMON CLXXIII. Conclusion. General Remarks Prov. viii, 6. . 623 Intjex. --....-,. 687 SERMON CXXXII. TENTH COMMANDMENT. AMBITION. Romans xii. 16. — Mind not liigh things. The subject of the preceding discourse, you may remember, was Avarice. In the present, 1 shall consider the other great exercise of a covetous spirit, viz. Ambition. Ambition is an affection of the mind, nearly related to Pride and Vanity, Vanity is the self-complacency, which we feel in the con sciousness of being superior to others. Pride is the same self- complacency, united with a contempt for those, whom we consider as our inferiors. Ambition is the desire of obtaining, or increas ing, tliis superiority. Vamty, Msually makes men civil and com plaisant. Pride, renders them rude, imperious, antf overbearing. Vanity, chiefly subjects men to the imputation of weakness ; aSt excites mingled emotions of pity and contempt. Pride, is often attended with a kind of repulsive dignity ; is rather seen to be de serving of contempt, than realized as the object of it ; sometimes awakens awe; and always creates hatred and loathing. Vain men are always ambitious; proud men generally; but they some times appear satisfied with their present envied superiority to all around them. Ambitious men are frequently vain, and sooner or later are always proud. Vanity rests chiefly on personal attri butes. Pride, in addition to these, fastens on every thing, which is supposed to create distinction. This love of superiority is the most . remarlcable exercise of Covetousness ; and, united with the discontentment and envy, by which it is regularly accompanied, appears to constitute the prin- ,cipal corruption of the human mind. It is impossible, without wonder, to observe the modes, in which mankind exercise it ; and the objects, in which it finds its gratification. They are of every kind ; and are found every where. We are proud and vain of whatever, in our own view, raises us above others ; whether a gift of nature, an attainment of our own, or a mere accident, Our pride and vanity are excited by the possession of personal beau ty, strength, or agility ; by a lively imagination, clear judgment, and tenderness of feeling ; by patrimonial wealth, and distinction of family ; by the fact, that we live in the same neighbourhood, or even in the same country, with persons of eminence ; that we know them ; or even that we have seen them. No less common ly are we proud and vain of bodily feats, graceful motions, and 6 AMBITION. [SER. CXXXlI. becoming manners ; of our gains ; of our learning, inventions, sal lies of wit, efforts of eloquence, and exploits of heroism ; of the employments, to which we are devoted; of the taste, which we display in our dress, entertainments, manner of living, building, and planting ; of our industry, prudence, generosity, and piety ; of our supposed interest in the Favour of God ; nay, even of our penitence, and humility. We are proud, also, of the town, in which we are born ; of the Church, to which we are attached ; of the country, in which, we Uve; of the beauty of its surface, the fertility of its soil, and the salubrity of its climate. In a word, these emotions are excited by every thing, from which a roving, eager imagination, and a corrupt heart, can elicit the means of per sonal distinction. So far as these gratifications of pride are not in our possession, but are yet supposed to be attainable ; or so far as they are sup posed capable of being increased, when already possessed by us ; they become objects of Ambition. We eagerly covet them, and labour strenuously to acquire them. In the humble circles of life, the first, and very frequently the last, aim of this doeiro of superiority is to rise above those, who ^ aiPe -iti Ihe same humble station. To be the first in a village would, it is said, have been more acceptable to Ccesar himself, than to have been the second in Rome. Most men certainly raise their ambition no higher than this very limited superiority. Neither their views, nor their circumstances, permit them to grasp at more extensive and more elevated objects. Persons, who move in a larger sphere, are apt to look down with contempt and pity upbn the lowly struggles for pre-eminence, which spring up in the cottage, and agitate the hamlet, without remembering, that they are just as rational, and just as satisfactory, while they are less distressing, and less guilty, than their own more splendid, and vio lent, efforts to obtain superior consequence. Minds of a more restless cast, of more expanded views, and more inordinate wishes, never stop, voluntarily, at such objects as these. The field of distinction is co-extended with the globe. The means, by which it may be acquired, are endless in their multi ¦' tude, and their application ; and the prize is always ready to crown the victor. It cannot be wondered at, that minds of such a cast' should, therefore, enter the race, and strujggle vigorously to gain the prize. I have remarked, that the means of distinction are endless in their multitude, and their application. The objects, from which it is immediately derived, are, however, comparatively few. These are chiefly toeaZiA, splendour, learning, strength of mind, genius, eloquence, courage, place, and power. To these are to be added those remarkable actions, which excite the adfniration and applause of mankind, '¦' aER. CXXXII.] AMBITlOlV 7 Among the objects, most immediately coveted by ambitious men, especially by those whose ambition has been peculiarly, ar dent and insatiable, yame, splendour, place, and power, have held the first rank. Splendour has been sought, as the means of fix ing, and dazzling, the eyes of their fellow-men ; place, and fame, as being partly the means of distinction, and partly the distinction itself; and power, as involving in its nature the most decisive and acknowledged superiority ; as including place, fame, and splen dour ; and as famishing all the earthly means of distinction. In to the chase for these objects, the great body of mankind have entered, whenever they have found an opportunity. The hum ble have striven for little places, and the show, which was intend ed to excite the stare of a neighbourhood. The aspiring have aimed at stations of high political consequence, and struggled to set the world agape. Men of limited views have confined their labours to the attainment of a character, which should circulate, with respect, through a village; orbe engraved, with marks of distinction, upon a tombstone ; while the lofty-minded have de manded a name, which should sound through the world, and a-waken the wonder of future generations. The powers of sub altern magistracy have satisfied multitudes ; while others have panted to grasp the sceptre of the monarch, and the sword of thc conqueror. The Text is directed against this spirit in every form and ': de gree. Mind not high things, says St, Paul to the Christians at Rome. The English word tnind, appears very happily to express the meaning ofthe original term, tpgovuvres : Give not your minds to high things with eiiher attentioii or desire. It will be easily seen, that this precept cuts up by the roots both the spirit, and the consequences, of Ambition. If we pay not the regard, here for bidden, to the objects of Ambition ; it is plain, that we shall neither cherish the spirit, nor pursue the conduct, which it dic tates. It is hardly necessary to observe, that the precept is di rected to us, with the same force and obligation, as to the Chris tians at Rome. The reasons for this prohibition are of the most satisfactory and sufiicient natm-e. As proofs of this truth I shall allege the following. 1. Ambition is a primary part of our Rebellion against the Law and Government of God. In the first discourse on the Tenth Command, I observed, that an inordinate desire of Natural good seems to be the commencement of sin, in a being, originally virtuous. The two great branches of this spirit, or the two great modes in which it operates, are Ambi tion and Avarice. Of these. Ambition is, without a question, the most universal, and the most powerfully operative. It extends to more objects ; exerts itself in a far greater variety of modes ; occupies, so far as we can judge, the minds of rauch greater roul- \ 8 AMBITION. [SE^. CXXXiL titudes ; is more restless, vehement, and, if possible, more crav ing. In every just consideration it holds, of course, the primary placer God has assigned his place and duties, his situation and enjoy ments, to every Intelligent creature. Impatience, with regard to this situation, and the duties which it involves ; discontent ment with the enjoyment, which it furnishes ; and those inor dinate desires for the stations and allotments of others, out ot which impatience and discontentment spring ; are, I think, evi dently the first risings of the mind against its Maker. In these emotions, the mind declares, that its Maker's Government is, in its own view, unreasonable and unjust ; and that his Dispensa tions are such, as to make it justifiably unwilling to regard them with obedience and submission. Thus it arraigns the Wisdom and Goodness of Jehovah ; and withdraws itself from allegi ance to the Ruler of all things. Ambition, then, the principal branch of this spirit, is the original rebellion against the Govern ment of God. Accordingly, the principal ingredient in the first transgression, was the ambition of our first Parents to become as gods, knozoing good and e-oU. A precept, which forbids the as sumption of so dangerous a character, and the pursuit of such fa tal conduct, can need no additional proof of its rectitude. Still, that, which is unnecessary to produce conviction, may be useful for the purpose of making impressions on the heart. I observe, therefore, 2. TTiat Ambition is fatal to the Happiness of the Ambitious man. It is proverbially acknowledged, that Envy and Discontent are only other names for misery. Yet these wretched attributes are always attendant on ambition. No mind can be contented, whose desires are ungratified. When those desires are eager, it will be still more discontented ; and when he, who cherishes those de sires, sees the good which he covets, in the possession of others, he cannot fail to be envious. But the desires of an ambitious man are always ungratified. That they are eager, needs no proof; and eager desires invariably overrun the measure of the expected enjoyment. When it is attained, therefore, it falls regularly short of the expectations, and wishes ; and thus the mind regularly fails of being satisfied, even when its efforts are crowned with success. The happiness of Heaven, we are taught, will be commensurate to the utmost desires of its inhabitants. In this world, ardent wishes were never satisfied ; nor high hopes ever indulged with- out disappointment. The man, toho enters the career of Political advancement, never acquires any thing like satisfaction, until he sees with absolute con viction, that he can gain nothing more. Then, indeed, he may sometimes sit down quietly ; because there is nothing within the horizon of his view to rouse his energy to new hopes, and new ex ertions. But his quiet is only the stagnant thilness, left by di^ap- SER. CXXXII. j AMBrriO.\. ;> {lointment ; tne paralytic torpor of despair. At first, he aims at a lumble office. He attains it ; and with new eagerness raises his views to one which is higher. He attains this also ; and more eager still, bends his efforts to the acquisition of a third. The acquisition of this, only renders more intense his thirst for another. Thus he heats hunself, like a chariot wheel, merely by his own career ; and will never cease to pant more and more ardently for promotion, until he finds his progress stopped by obstacles, which neither art, nor influence, can remove. In the same manner, the Candidate for Literary eminence, com mences the chase of fame, with wishes usually moderate. His first success, however, enlarges his views ; and gives new vigour to his desires. Originally, he would have been satisfied with the distinction of being celebrated through a village. Thence he wishes to spread his name through a city ; thence through a coun try ; thence through the world ; and thence through succeeding generations. Were sufiicient means of communication furnishied, he would be still more ardently desirous to extend his fame throughout the whole planetary regions ; and from them to the utmost extent of the stellary system. Were all the parts of this immeasurable career possible, his mind, at the end of it, would be less contented, than at the commencement ; and would find, with a mixture of astonishment and aJgony, that the moment, when the strife was terminated, the enjoyment, which it promised, was gone. In the pursuit of Power, this truth is still more forcibly illus trated. He, who with distinguished political talents devotes him self to this acquisition, hurries with increasing vehemence from petty domination through all the grades of superior sway, until he becomes a Cromwell, or a King. He who aims at the same object through a military progress, starts firom a school, in the character of a cadet, and pushes through the subordinate ofiices to the com mand of a Regiment ; a Brigade ; a Division ; and an army. With an ambition, changing from desire into violence, fi-om violence into rage, and from rage into frenzy, he then becomes a Consul ; a King ; an Emperor ; a Monarch of many crowns, and many realms : and burns with more intense ardour to go on, subduing and ruhng, until the earth furnishes nothing more to be ruled or subdued. Thus the ambition, which at first was a spark, is soon blown into a flame, and terminates in a conflagration. Alexander subdued, and ruled, the known world. When he had finished his course, he sat down and wept ; becaiise there was no other world for him to conquer. Thus it is plain, that the desires of Ambition must ever be un gratified, because they increase faster than any possible gratifica tion ; and because they increase with a progressive celerity ; expanding faster at every future, than at any preceding, period of enjoyment. Though all rivers run into this ocean, still it is Vol. IV, 2 10 AMBmOiS. [SEK. CXXXII, not full. Although milhons continually crowd into this grave, still it says not, " It is enough." As Avarice would never cease to crave, until it had gorged the riches of the Universe ; so Am bition would never rest, until it had ascended the Throne of the Creator. But, after all its accumulations, there will be wealth, which Avarice cannot grasp. After all its achievements, there will be heights, which Ambition cannot climb. Discontentment, therefore, and murmuring, towards the. God who will not give the coveted enjoyments, and envy, towards the created beings who possess them, will rankle in the insatiable bosom ; and annihilate the com fort, which might otherwise spring, from the mass of gopd, already acquired. Ahab, on the throne of Israel, made himself miserable, because he could not lay his hands on the humble vineyard of Naboth. Haman, an obscure captive, was elevated to the second place of power, and distinction, in the Empire of Persia ; com prehending at that time, almost all the wealth, and people, of the known world. Yet, at this height of power and splendour, in an assembly of his family and friends, while he was reciting, to them the glory of his riches, the multitude of his children, and all the ihings wherein the king had promoted him, and how he had advanced him above the princes and servants of the king ; when he said. More over, Esther, the queen, did let no man come in with the king unto the banquet, that she had prepared, but myself: and to-morrow am I invited unto her, also, with the King : this aspiring, haughty wretch could add, Yet all this availeth me nothing, so long as I see Mordecai, ihe Jew, sitting ai the kingis gate. Our first parents became discontented with their very nature', and under the influence of Ambition wished to become as gods. In this monstrous wish, they have been often followed by their de scendants. Several of the Persian Emperors, Alexander the Great, and several of the Roman Emperors, claimed divine hon ours ; and demanded sacrifices and libations. The Bishops of Rome, also, have arrogated to themselves the peculiar titles of Je hovah ;* and, have accordingly granted absolutions of sin, and passports to Heaven. Nay, they have abrogated the Commands of God ; substituted for them contrary precepts ; ascended the throne of the Redeemer; assumed the absolute Government of his Church ; permitted, and interdicted, its worship at their plea sure ; claimed the world as their property ; and declared all man kind to be their vassals. Beyond all this, they have given, openly and publicly, indulgences, or permissions, to sin. Thus has this Man of sin, this Son of perdition, exalted himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped. Thus has he, as God, sat in the temple.of God, shewing himself to be God. With all these boundless demands of enjoyment, however, this unvarying claim to the exclusive possession of natural good, Am- • DominuS) Deus noster, Papa. SER. CXXXII.] UMBITION. H bition never performed a single duly to God, or to man. To a mind, under the control of this passion, moral good has no charms ; and never becomes the object of either complacency, or desire. By such a man, his own soul is neglected and forgotten ; his fellow- raen are neither befriended nor loved ; and his God is neither wor shipped nor obeyed. All his talents, and all his time, are employ ed, with unceasing drudgery, solely to adorn, gratify, and exalt, himself. Of this wretched idol he regards the earth as the shrine, and the skies as the temple. To this idol, he sacrifices all that he is, and all that he has ; and demands from others every offering, which he can claim, and they can give. In homage to this idol, he makes every duty give way, and, so far as is in his power, bends all the interests of his fellow-men, and those of the Universe ; and sets it up as a rival to God Himself. In such a mind, how can the sense of duty be kept alive.? How can he, whose attention is thus fascinated by personal greatness and distinction, whose soul is swollen by the consciousness of per sonal superiority, find either inclination, or leisure, for so humble an employment, as tKe performing of his duty ? In such a mind, how can repentance even begin ? How can such a mind compre hend the necessity of relying on the Redeemer for acceptance with God ? How can such a mind realize either the importance, or the existence, of moral obligation ; or feel itself bound to obey the Will of its Creator ? Given up to sin, ' not from negligence only, from inconsideration, or heedless propensity, but from settled design, from ardent choice, from laborious contrivance, how can such a mind furnish room for the admission of humility, dependence, the fear of God, submission to his will, contentment, benevolence, equity, or compassion ? But where these attributes are not, no duty can be performed. To his own family, indeed, he may be thought to render some of those services, which are obviously required both by Reason and Revelation. All men are commanded to provide for those of their own house : and for his own house the ambitious man ac tually provides ; but not in such a manner, as either to perform his own duty, or benefit his family. He labours, indeed, to make them great ; but not to make them wise, just, 'or good. His chil dren he regards merely as heirs ; and not as moral beings, placed during the present hfe in a state of trial, and destined in a future world to a state of reward. They are, therefore, taught, govern ed, influenced, and habituated, to no duty, and to no real good. His only object is to invest them with a superiority, resembling his own ; that they may be decent companions to him, while he lives, and inherit his grandeur, after his death. They are, therefore, ediicated to be in all respects as bad, and in most, worse than himself. The great point of instruction, which they receive, from the cradle to the end of his life, is that all things human and di vine are to give way to the pursuit of personal distinction. He, ] J AMBITIOX. [SER. CXXXII. who educates his family in this manner, cannot be believed to per form, of design, a single parental duty. As the Ambitious man regards riot the real interest of his own family ; it cannot be believed, that he will exercise any greater tenderness for those of his fellow-men. I have already remarked, that his mind can furnish no room for the admission of benevo lence, equity, and compassion. Without these attributes, it is hardly necessary to observe, no duty to mankind can be performed. To God, this lofty-minded being cannot be expected to render any part of that homage, which he demands from all other beings to himself. The only language of his heart, while looking down from the height, to which he imagines himself raised by a series of prosperous efforts, is, I will ascend into Heaven: I will exalt my throne above the stars of God : Iwill ascend above the heights ofthe clouds : I will be like the Most High. What Submission, what obedience, what worship, can co-exist with this language, and the thoughts from which it springs ! At the same time, the Ambitious man surrounds himself with a host of temptations. The unclean spirit, which originally dwelt in his heart, after having gone out, and walked in dry places, seeking rest, and finding none ; after saying, / will return to my house, whence I came out ; ha? already entered it again, and found it eifipty, swept, and garnished, for his reception. Already has he gone, and takeri with Mmself seven other spirits, more wicked than himself; and they have entered in, and taken final possession of this convenient residence. His temper, his ruling passion, his course of life, holds out a welcome to every temptation ; a call to every sin ; a summons to every fiend. His mind is a cage of un clean and furious passions. His purposes demand for their ac complishment the continual intervention of falsehood, fraud, in justice, and cruelty, of impiety and irrehgion. The sins of such a man, instead of following after him, march before him in regular array ; and fight, maraud, and plunder, to fulfil his designs, and to satiate the mahgnity of those evil spirits, who have taken up their final habitation iri his bosom. 3. Ambition is the source of numerous and terrible evils to man kind. To comprehend the import of this truth, even in the imperfect nianner in which it can be comprehended by u.s, it would be neces sary to recur to the history of the human kind. In all age_s, and in all nations, this vast record has been little else, than a delinea tion of the miseries, which this malignant passion has produced. It has been a tale of sorrows, and groans, and sighs, and tears. The earth has rung throughout its immense regions with the melan choly murmur ; and the walls of Heaven have echped back mourn ing, lamentation, and wo. In a short discourse, like this, were it to be changed into a mere vocabulary, the very names of the va rious sufferings, wrought by Ambition, could not be alphabetically SER. CXXXII.] .AMBITION. 13 recited. A loose and general specification of very few of these evils, is all that can be accomplished, and, therefore, all that will be at tempted. Among the several adventurers in the field pf distinction, none appears so Hkely to be harmless, as the Candidate for literary fame. Learning is an object, naturally so useful, and the pursuit of it an employment so quiet, and so little ominous to the public peace, as to induce us very easily to believe, that Ambition, here at least, would be innoxious and unalarming. Should this, how ever, be our conclusion ; we should find ourselves not a httle dis appointed. There has been a period, of which but too many traces still remain ; a period, in which it was fashionable, and therefore an object of ambition, to be a free-thinker. Literary men, of this description, trumpeted so loudly, and so incessantly, the learning, genius, and philosophy, of themselves, and their co adjutors ; vapoured with so much parade concerning their supe riority to superstition, their independence, their liberality, and their exemption fi-om prejudice ; and promised so magnificently to rescue their fello-w-men from the mists of error, and from the bondage of the mind, that the young, the ignorant, and the silly, dazzled by these splendid pretensions, became ambitious of this distinction ; and without examination, or conviction, became free-thinkers, in numerous instances, merely that they might have the honour of be ing united to this cluster of great inen. The men themselves, finding that they had become great, in the estimation of others, by means of these lofty pretensions, went on, and became still greater by increasing their pretensions. By the mere dint of study and reflection, they claimed to understand, and teach, the Will of God concerning the duty and salvation of men ; to explore the fu ture designs of Omniscience ; and to prescribe rules of justice, and propriety, according to which, if they were to be believed God himself was bound to conduct his Administrations to man kind. The Scriptures they not only discarded, but loaded with every calumny, and every insult. The Redeemer of the world they insulted even more grossly, than the ancient Jews had done • stained his character with vice and infamy ; and annihilated his' Mediation. In the mean time, they poured out a torrent of im moral principles, which they dignified with the name of Philoso phy; and which they proposed as proper rules to direct the con duct of men. By these principles the faith of mankind was per plexed; their morahty unhinged ; the distinction between virtue and vice destroyed ; the existence of both denied ; and the bonds of society cut asunder. Men, of course, were let loose upon each other without the restraint of moral precepts ; without the checks of Conscience ; without the Fear of God. The late Revolution in France, that volcanic explosion, which deluged the world with successive floods of darkness and fire, had all its materials collected, and its flames kindled, by men of this 14 AMBITION. [SER. CXXXII. description. It is not intended, that literary consequence was the only distinction, sought by those who were the prime agents in producing this terrible shock of nature. The lust of power had undoubtedly its full share in bringing to pass this astonisnirig event. But the desire of fame had its share also. Had not the principles of the French nation been deeply corrupted, their morals dissolv ed, and their sense of religious obligation destroyed, by the pen of sophistry ; it is incredible, that they should, at once, have burst all the bonds of nature and morality, transmigrated in a moment from the character of civilized men into that of wolves and tigers, and covered their country with havoc and blood. In the career of political distinction, the progress is usually more rapid, and the change more astonishing. In this career, men" of fair moral reputation, and decent life, when seized by the disease of Ambition, lose suddenly all -their former apparent principles, and are changed at once into oifice-hunters and demagogues. To obtain a place, or to acquire .suffrages, they become false, venal, and treacherous; corrupt and bribe others, and are tjhemselves corrupted and bribed ; become panders to men of power; and sy cophants to the multitude ; creep through the serpentine mazes of electioneering ; and sell their souls for a vote, or an appointment, in the dark recesses of a cabal. Their rivals also, they calumniate with all the foul aspersions, which ingenuity can invent, malignity adopt, obloquy utter, or falsehood convey. The more virtuous, wise, and respected, these rivals may be ; the more artful and incessant will be their calum nies ; because from such men they feel the danger of defeat to be peculiarly alarming. Wisdom and worth, therefore, are pre-emi nently the objects of their hatred, and persecution ; and fall by the scythe of Ambition, as by the scythe of death. The people at large, in the mean time, are duped by every false tale, which the cunning of these men enables them to invent ; ter rified by every false alarm ; corrupted by every false principle ; and misled into every dangerous and fatal measure, i Neighbours in this manner are roused to jealousy, hatred, and hostihty, against neighbours ; friends against friends ; brothers against brothers ; the father against the son ; and the son against the father. Truth and justice, kindness, peace, and happiness, fly before these evil genii. Anarchy, behind them, summons her hosts to the civil con flict. Battles are fought with unnatural rage, and fell violence: fields are covered with carnage, and drenched in blood ; until there are norie left to contend, and the country is converted into a desert. Then despotism plants his throne on the ruins, and stretches his iron sceptre over the miserable reliques, of the nation. Such was often the progress of political ambition in the ancient and modern Republics of Europe ; and such, there is no small reason to fear, may one day be its efficacy on our own happy land. When, instead of the love of place and pohtical distinction, the SER. CXXXII.] AMBITION. 15 passion for power, and a determination to rule, has taken posses sion of the heart ; the evils have been far more numerous, exten sive, and terrible. These evils have been the chief themes of his tory in all the ages of time. It cannot be necessary, that they should be particularized by me. In some countries of Asia and Africa, the candidate for the throne secures his possession of that proud and dangerous eminence, by imprisoning, for life, every heir, and every competitor ; in others, by putting out their eyes ; and, in others, by murdering them in cold blood. Thus nations are by this infernal passion shut out from the possibihty of being governed by mild, upright, and benevolent rulers. Ambition knows no path to a throne, but a path of blood ; and seats upon it none but an assassin. The adherents to an unsuccessful can didate, although supporting their lawful prince, and performing a duty, which God has enjoined, and from which ihey cannot be re leased, are involved in his ruin. Prisons are crowded with hun dreds and thousands of miserable wretches, guiltj of no crime, but that of endeavouring to sustain the government, and resisting usurpation. The axe and the' halter, the musket and the can non, desolate cities, and provinces, of their inhabitants ; and thin the ranks of mankind, to make the seat of the tyrant secure. Not one of, these unhappy wretches was probably worse, all were probably better, men, than he, who bathed his hands in their blood. Cassar fought fifty-six pitched battles, and killed pne million two hundred thousand huirian beings, to secure to himself the Roman sceptre. More than three millions of such beings have been slaughtered to place the modern Ccesar in: the undisputed posses sion of his imperial greatness. To all these miserable sufferers, God gave life, and friends, and comforts, with a bountiful hand. Why were they not permitted to enjoy these blessings, during the period allotted to man ? Because Ambition was pleased to put its veto, upon the benevolent dispensations of the Creator: be cause, to satiate one man, it became necessary to sacrifice the happiness of millions, better than himself: because such a being could be pleased to see himself seated upon a throne, although it was erected in a stall of slaughter, and environed by a lake of blood. SERMON CXXXIII. man's inability to obey the LAW, OP GOD. Rouars viii. 7. — Because the carnal mind is enmity against God ; for it is not tub- ject to the Law of God, neither indeed can be. IN a long series of discourses, I have examined the Law of Gqd ; or the Preceptive part of the Scriptures, This examination 1 have distributed into two great divisions: the first involving that Summary of the La-w, which, Christ' informs us, contains the substance of all that is enjoined, in the Old Testament : the sec ond, including the Decalogue ; in which this summary is enlarged from two preceptsto ten ; and the duties, which it requires, iare more particularly exhibited. In both of these divisions 1 ha-ve considered, as I found occasion, those' Comments, also, of Christ, the Prophets, and the Apostles, which explain and enforce the various requisitions. The importance of these Precepts does more than justify ; it demands the extensive place, allotted to them in this system, and the attempts, which have here been made, to recommend them to the faith, and the obedience, of this Assembly. The end of all useful speculation is practice. The use of all truth is, ultimately, to regulate the conduct of Intelligent beings. Those, which are called the doctrines of the Scriptures, are ne cessary, and profitable, to mankind in two respects. The first is, that they involve immediate practical duties, to a vast extent : the second is,, that byi^aching us our character, situation, and rela tions to God and each other, and the character of God, together with his relations to us, they show us the foundation of all our du ty ; the reasons of it ; the motives to it ; and "the ma(nher, in which it is to be performed. Most of these things are unfolded to us by the Precepts of the Scriptures. They are also attended by some advantages, which are peculiar to themselves. They de clare our duty directly ; and declare it in the form of law. An authoritative rule is given in each of them, announcing the Will of the Lawgiver, requiring our obedience, and prohibiting our diso bedience, with rewards and penalties, annexed to every pre cept : not, indeed, annexed to every precept in form ; but so as to be always, easily present to the eyes of those for whom the law was made. Iristruction, communicated in this manner, is at tended by a force arid efficacy, of which all other teaching is incapable. ^ SER. cxxxm.] ^L\.^ s i.v.iBiLiTV, i.c 17 From these considerations, arises the importance of inculcating much, and often, the preceptive part of the Scriptures, from the Desk. I well know, that preaching of this nature has been op posed, and censured, by individuals, in several classes of Chris tians. By Antinomians it may be consistently censured. As these men suppose themselves released from the Law of God, as a rule of duty, by the gracious dispensation of the Gospel ; they have considered the preaching of the Law as useless, and even as mischievous. Such sermons as have urged the rehgious and moral duties of man, they have styled " legal sermons," and those who have delivered them, " legal preachers.'' By this language they have intended to insinuate, or openly to declare, that the de sign of such preaching was die estabhshment of the doctrine, that we are justified by works of Laze ; and the subversion of the Evangehcal doctrine, that zre are justified by grace, through faith in the Redeemer. That men have urged obedience to the Pre cepts of the Scriptures, with this design. I shall not question, any more than that the same men have pursued the same design by descanting on the doctrines of the Scriptures •, and even on those, which ctre purely Evangehcal. But, that inculcating the practical duties, which are required of mankind in the Scriptures, is, in this sense, legal preaching, I wholly deny. If this is its true charac ter, Christ Himself -tvas a legal preacher. This Glorious Person in his own discourses has given these precepts, expatiated upon them, and urged obedience to them upon mankind, in a vast multi tude of forms, to a great extent, and with' unrivalled force and beauty. His Sermon on the Mount is an illustaous, and pre-em inent example of this nature. This error, it must be owned, has not been confined to Antino mians. Zealous men, enrolled by themselves in other classes of Christians, and deluding themselves, almost of course, by the ¦warmth, and haste, with -which they decide concerning every subject, have entertained similar views, and adopted similar lan guage. I would ask these men, To what purpose were the precepts of the Scriptures given ? Why are they so often, so variously, and so forcibly urged upon mankind ? I would ask them, Whether all Scripture is, or is not, given by inspiration of God; and whether it is, or is not, ail profitable, not only /brJoc- trine, reproof, and correction, but also ybr instruction in righteous ness ? If this inquiry must be answered aflBrmatively concerning the Old Testament ; it camiot be answered negatively concerning the New. There are those, who, on the contrary, confine most or all of their discourses from the Pulpit to the precepts of the Scriptures : and either wholly, or chiefly, leave the doctrines, which they con tain, out of their preaching. Such preachers are equally censur able with their adversaries. No justification can be pleaded for the conduct of ei'her. This separation cannot lawfullv be made Vol, IV. ^ 13 MAIN'S INABILITV TO [SEK. CXXXIII.' by either. God has united them : they cannot, therefore, be dis joined by man. He, who preaches a part of the Gospel, cannot be said to preach the Gospel which Paul preached. He may not, indeed, utter doctrines, or precepts, contrary to those of Paul, But he purposely avoids preaching the whole' Gospel of Paul ; and al though not guilty of denying, or subverting, either the truths, or the injunctions, given us by the Aposde, yet, for mutilating the system, he merits severe reprehension. Such preachers, as profess the doctrines of the Reformation, have been frequendy charged with neglecting, to a great degree, the duty of inculcating the Morality ofthe Gospel, In solitary in stances, the charge may have been deserved. That it is generally just, there is not a single reason to beheve. . 1 regard it as one of those general charges, which fall every where, and rest no where : the refuge of weak and unworthy minds, when they wish to indulge a spirit of bitterness by uttering severe imputations, and yet dare not fasten them upon individuals, for fear of being required to sup port them by evidence. So far as my knowledge of preachers extends, those, who are sometimes called "Evangelical," inculcate the practical duties of mankind with more frequency, and more earnestness, than most other men. They do not, indeed, preach the morals of Heathen Philosophy. But they preach the cordial, principled morality of the Gospel, springing from the faith, without which it isfimpossible to please God, In my own view, this preaching is indispensable to mankind : and I cordially unite with the excellent Doddridge in saying, " Hap py would it be for the Church of Christ, if these important doctrines of practical religion were more inculcated ; and less of the zeal of its teachers spent in discussing vain questions, and intricate strifes about words, which have been productive of so much envy and contention, obloquy arid suspicion," — The next subject, -(vhich offers itself to our consideration in a System of Theology, is ihe Nature of that Inability to obey the Di vine Law, which is commonly acknowledged to be apart of the human ".character. It is hardly necessary to observe, that scarcely any moral subject has been more a theme of contention, than this. It is no part of my design to recount the clashing opinions, which have been formed conceriiing it, or the controversies, to which it has given birth. Metaphysical discussion has, for ages, lavished upon it all its subtilties. As I neither claim the reputation, nor enjoy the pleasure, furnished by disquisitions of this nature, I shall not attempt to add any subtilties of my own to the mass, which has already been accumulated. That ingenious men have, in several instances, thrown considerable light upon this difficult topic, I read ily admit ; and can easily believe, that it may be illumined still further. It will be a prime part of my own design not to environ it with darkness and perplexity. A plain tale is always attended by this advantage, that it may be easily understood. That, which SER. CXXXIII.] OBEY THE LAW OF GOD. 19 I shall utter, will, I hope,' be accompanied by the important addi tional advantage, that it will be true. In the Text we are informed, that ihe carnal mind is noi subject to the Law of God, neither indeed can be. The words translated the carnal mind, are to (p^o\i-r\y.ix, t»)s dagxos, the miriding of the fiesh. To mind, is to regard zoith attention, respect, or desire. Here it plainly signifies that general course of desires, which is exercised by mankind, in certain circumstances, towards certain objects; and which, in the preceding verse, is declared to be a state of spiritual death ; or to terminate in future, everlasting death. It is obviously the prevailing, characteristical course of desire; the whole minding of the flesh. In the Text it is declared to be enmity against God. What is intended by the flesh is explained to us by Christ, John iii. 6. That which is born of the flesh is flesh ; and ihat which is born qf the Spirit is spirit. In other words, that which is born of man is possessed of the proper character of man. There are but two kinds of birth, mentioned in the Scriptures ; and both these are expressed by our Saviour in this passage : viz. the Natural BirtK, and Regentrai-iuTL. All that, which experiences the Natural Birth, and this only, is declared by Christ to be flesh ; as that, which experiences the Spiritual Birth, or Regeneration, is declared to be spirit. The moral character, here intended, is strongly indicated by our Saviour, when he informs us, that, that which is born of the flesh only, cannot, and that, that which is born efthe Spirit, can, see the Kingdom of God. This moral character is still more particularly delineated by St. Paul, Galatians v. 19-23. Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these : Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, -lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, mur ders, drunkenness, reveUings, and such Uk£, Of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, ihat they, which do such things, shall noi inherit the Kingdom of God, But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, long-suffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance. It will hardly need "proof, that the former of these classes of affections and actions, and such as these, are characteristical of man in his natural, unrenewed state ; nor that the latter are exhibited by the Scriptures as constituting the true character of the Children of God. That the affections^^-here mentioned, are not subject to the Laze of God, will not admit of a question : since they are the very things forbidden by that Law. That they cannot be thus subject, while they continue to exist, is equally evident. Nor is it less certain from the proofs, -given both by Revelation and Experience, that, where the soul is not renewed by the Spirit of God, they continue to exist through life. Revelation teaches us, that, unless a man be horn again of the Spirit of God, he will continue to sustain the flesh ly or natural character, while he hves ; and that all those, who receive Christ, and become the Children of God, are born, not of 20 ilA.N 3 I.NABILITV TO [SER. CXXXIU. blood, nor of the will of the fiesh, nor of the will ofman, hut af God. Experience shows, also, with a regidar testimony, that the native moral character of man continues, in the ordinary course of things, the same through hfe. The. Nature of this Inability to obey the Law of God is, in my own view, completely indicated by the Word Indisposition, or the word Disinclination. To elucidate this position I observe, 1 . That the Divine Law originally requires nothing hut Affec tion. Thou shalt love ihe Lord thy God with all thy heart; and thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Here love to God and man is the only thing, expressly required. But it hardly needs to be observed, that to be inchned, or disposed to love God and our neighbour, is to possess that character, out of which all direct ex ercises of Love spring of course. He, therefore, who possessed this character, would, whenever his mind was active at all, exer cise the affection, which is here required. He would he, and do, all which the Law enjoins, when considered in this point of view : for his disposition, and his exercises, would be the very things which are enjoined. Indisposition, or disinclination, to obey, then, is the only difficulty in the way of obedience; and, with respect to this subject, the only inability ofman. 2. When the Divine Law, in its various Precepts, requires external actions, as affections ; if our disposition accord with the Precept, the action zuill of course be performed. I speak, here, of such actions, as are in our power : for the Law of God never requires any other. For example, children are required to honour their Parents; particularly to support them, when, from their age, or infirmity, they are unable to support themselves. It will not be doubted, that, if Children are disposed thus to support them, they will actu ally furnish the support. Men are forbidden to steal. The case, it may be confidently aflarmed, was never known, and never will be, in which a man, inclined upon the whole to obey this Command, or entirely disinclined to steal, was guilty of theft. Mankind are forbidden to murder. No man, absolutely indisposed to murder, ever perpetrated this crime. As in these, so in all other cases ; as with respect to these Precepts, so with respect to all others; active obedience follows, inseparably, the disposition to obey. Wherever the inclination accords with the Precept, the tongue, the hands, and the feet, conform of course, and entirely, to its decisions. , 3. If an Angel were to descend from Heaven, and reside upon the earth ; he would, if he preserved his present disposition, obey the Di vine Law as truly and as perfectly as he does now. If an Angel were in this world, and were to possess exactly the same disposition which he possesses in the Heavenly world ; he would obviously feel, and act, in the same manner. In other Stat, cwxiii.j uBEV rm; i-vw vv uuii 21 wonls, he would be an Angel still. Were wc to sii})1)osl' his I'uc- ulties lessened to the measure of ours, so that his understanding, aad other natural powers, should in no respect exceed those of men; still, if his angelic disposition remained, he would perfectly obey the Divine Law. He vvould love God with all ihe heart, and his neighbour as himself. Should wc suppose him to be lowered down, still farther, to the level of a child, and to possess no natural powei's superior to those usually found in children ; hc would, nevertheless, if he retained his angelic disposition, continue to be perfectly obedient. Should any person question this ; let him remember, that the Child Jcsus is, in the Scriptures, pronounced to have been holy, and perfectly obedient, from the womb ; and throughout all the successive periods of his life. When his facul ties were in the earliest stages of their progress, he as perfectly obeyed, as he did, after he oegan his public Ministry. It cannot, then, be rationally doubted, that the angelic disposition, whatever might be the natural powers which it governed, would be, and would accomphsh, all that is meant by perfect obedience to the Law of God. Of course, ihc real and only reason, why we per form not this obedience, i.s, that we do not possess such a disposi tion, as that of Angels, Our natural powers are plainly sufficient : our inclination only is defective. 4. This disinclination to obedience is still so obstinate and enduring, that it is neiter reUnquished by man, except when under the renewing «w/2wenc« of the Spirit of God, 1 have already observed, that those, who receive Christ, and be came the Children of God, are declared by St. John, to be bom not of blood, nor of the will of the fiesh, nor of the will of man, but of God; and by our Saviour, to be born of the Divine Spirit, The fol lowing passage from the prophet Ezekiel, chapter xxxvii. 24 — 28, will, f suppose, prove beyond a doubt, if not beyond a cavil, that this disposition is changed only by God Himself. For Iwill take you from among the Heathen, and gather you out of all countries, and zoill bring you into your own land. Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you ; and ye shall be clean from all your filthiness; and fromyour idols will I cleanse you, .1 new heart also will I give you, and a nezo spirit will I put within you ; and I zoill take away thc stony heart out of your fiesh, and I will give you an heart offiesh. And Iwill put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes ; and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them. In this passage God declares, that he will gather the Israelites out of all countries into their own land; that he will cleanse them from all their filthiness ; that he will give them a new heart, and a new spirit ; that he will take away their stony heart, and give them an heart of flesh ; that he will put his Spirit within them, and cause them to walk in bis statutes ; that they shall be his people ; and that he will be their God. When all this is accomplished, he says. Then shall ye reme^mhtr i/^ur own evil ways, and your doings that 22 MAN'S INABILITY TO [SER. CXXXIII. mere not good; and shall loath yourselves in your own sight for your iniquities, and for your abominations. Here, the renovation of the human heart is described by sprinkling clean water ; cleans ing them from all their filthiness ; giving them a new heart ; put ting in them a new spirit ; taking away their stony heart; giving them a heart of flesh ; putting the Spirit of God within them ; and causing them to walk in his statutes. All this, God says, and that in the plainest terms possible. He himself will do for them,> As con sequences of it all, God says, that they shall remfember their own evil ways ; shall loath themselves in their own sight for their ini quities ; and shall keep His statutes, and do them. As a further consequence. He says, thai they shall be his people, and. that He will be their God, The nature of this renovation cannot, here, be mistaken. It consists in having a new heart, differing froin that which they originally possessed, as a heart of flesh differs from a heart of stone. It is also a heart, cleansed from th& filthiness of sin, and inclined to walk in the statutes and judgments of God. Itis also a heart, which will induce him, to whom it is given, to re member his own evil ways, to loath himself for his own iniquities, and to keep the Judgments, op Commands, of God, and do them. That this is the moral character, exhibited every where in the Scriptures, as required by the Law of God, as unpossessed by man in his original or natural state, and as given him in what is called the New Birth, cannot, if the words be allowed to have their own meaning, or any meaning, consistent with their use elsewhere in the Scriptures, be questioned. But of this change in the Israel ites, at the period specified, God, in the most determinate language, declares himself to be the Efficient,^ Of this change, then, lie' cer tainly will, and -man certainly. z«j^/ not, be the Efficient, But if God will be the Author of this change in the Israelites, He is un questionably the Author of it, wherever it is experienced. Thus it is completely evident from the' Scriptures, that the natural disin- chnation ofman to obey the Divine Law is so obstinate, that it will not be overcome, or removed, by itself. ' The proof of this truth from Experience is, I acknowledge, less decisive, than that from Revelation ; and is formed by an induction of too many particulars, as I observed in a former discourse, to be adduced on such an occasion as the present. The evidence, fur nished by Reason and Experience concerning this doctrine, must be merely auxiliary. Concerning subjects of this kind, concern- . ing the agency of voluntary beings, the nature of causation uni versally, and the manner in which causes operate, metaphysically considered, our knowledge niust be confessed to be very imper fect. It deserves our attention however, that the vvhole evidence, furnished by Experience, goes to support this doctrine. All men of plainly acknowledged piety, so far ds my information extends, have agreed in attributing their own renovation to the Agency of the Divine Spirit. To this attribution they have been led, also, SER. CXXXIIL] OBEY THE LAW OF GOD. 03 by a deep and solicitous attention to facts, existing in their own minds. Although tiiese fects have been greatly diversified in many respects, yet such men testify with a single voice, that they have been greatly alarmed on account of their guilt and danger ; that, with an obvious or secret, but ultimately discovered, reliance on their own efforts, they have laboured witii great earnestness to es cape from both ; that, in the end, they have clearly discerned all these efforts to be vain ; that, with a fiail conviction of their own insufficiency, they have cast themselves upon the Divine Mercy ; realizing, that all their sufficiency for the great purpose in view must be of God, In this situation, they unitedly testify, they found, commencing in them sooner or later, a disposition, not perceptibly connected, as an effect, with any efforts of their own, prompting. them to loath themselves for their iniquities ; to confide in Christ as their Saviour; to love and fear God ; and tokeep his commandments, and do them. This disposition, also, they unitedly declare, irregularly but really increased, as they advanced in hfe ; while the propensity to disobedience lessened in the same manner. Now, let me ask. Is it credible, that all these men should radically err with respect to this subject ? Is it credible, that they should all mistake the facts ? Is it credible, that all should draw from them the same, and yet a false conclusion ? This supposition in volves another, which must, I think, be reluctantly admitted by every rehgious man; viz. That God, in accomphshing the salvation of mankind, orders things in such a manner, as that those who are renewed, are, to say the least, in almost all instances deceived with respect to the Author of their renovation ; and that, wliile em ployed, not with integrity merely, but with deep solicitude, in ex ploring the state of their own minds and lives. According to this supposition, not only must their apprehensions concerning these important fects be false, and, so far as T can see, riecessarily false, but all their emotions of gratitude, and all their ascriptions of praise, to their Creator, for his agency in effectuating this happy change in their character, must be also false and unfounded. These ascriptions were begun in the early days of religion. Prophets and Apostles set the example, ^All that was morally good in themselves, or in others, they attributed to the efficacious Grace of God, In this attribution, Christians have foHowed them throughout every succeeding age. Thus, according to this suppo sition, a succession of false, and therefore indefensible, ascriptions of praise, has ascended to God from the great body of pious per sons in all the ages of the Church ; which, yet, "they could not honestly, and in consistence with the best views, which they were able to form, have failed to render. At the same time, no instances have occurred, in which men have, by direct efforts of thefr own, without the efficacious influ ence of the Divine Spirit, changed their moral character from sin to holmess. Not onlv have no such instances occurred, which 24 MAN'S INABILITY TO [SER. CXXXW. have been clear and unequivocal, and such as might be supposed to decide this point in favour of the supposition ; but no collection of iij&tances can be found, which lean towards it, in a sufficient de gree, to render it probable. The whole stream of evidence, fur nished both by the public and private history of experimental religion, is against the opinion, which I have endeavoured to dis prove, and in favour of that, which I have asserted. Whatever may be the judgment, formed by the spirit of contro versy, and cold metaphysical inve^igation, concerning this part of the su^'ect, the doctrine will be readily admitted by all men, who are affficted by a deep sense of their guilt, and struggle hard to obtain a release from their sinful character ; and by all who, having thus suffered, and thus struggled, have felt themselves, in the end, actually released from the dominant control of a sinful disposition. This doctrine is elucidated by experience, also, in another man ner. God, who requires our faith, repentance, and obedience to his Law, has set before us numberless and most powerful motives, to engage our compliance ; motives, which, all sober men will ac knowledge, ought to persuade us ; motives, which arfi obviously of infinite import. Why do not men, who believe the Gospel to be the Word of God, and who have these motives presented to them, clearly and forcibly, from Sabbath to Sabbath, believe, re pent, and obey ? No answer, it is presutned, can be given to this question, which will accord with t)ie supposition, agairist which I contend. ' . 5. There is yet no more difficulty ,in oUeying God, than in doing any thing else, to zuhich our inclination is opposed with equal strength and obstinacy. A child is equally unable to obey a parent, against whom his will is as much opposed, as to obey God. This inability of chilr dren to obey their parents does not, indeed, commonly last through life. But while it lasts, the child can no more obey his parent, than his Maker. In both cases, his inability is, I apprehend, of ex actly the sariie nature. Sometimes, also, it continues while he lives. In such cases, it is, in all respects, the same ; equally ob stinate, equally enduring, equally preventing him from doing his duty. If, in this case, his filial duty be urged upon him in its reli gious nature, as required by the Law of God ; his opposition to perform his duty to God and his Parent, will be found exactly co incident; to be the same indivisible thing ; and to be regarded with the same obduracy of heart. These considerations will, to a considerable extent, explain many Scriptural passages, which relate to this subject. No man, saith our Saviour, can come unto me, except the Father, who hath sent me, draw him. The true meaning of this, he appears to me to ex plain in a parallel declaration to the Jews : Ye will not come unto me, that ye might have life. That he, who is willing to come to Christ, witfactually come to him, we are taught by Christ Himself in the last SER. CXXXIII.] TO OBEY THE LAW OF GOD. 2.5 chapter of the Apocalypse : Whosoever will, or is willing, ('o dsKuv) let him come, and take the water of life freely. From these passages itis evident, that every one, who is willing, has the full permission of Christ to come to him, and partake of his blessings. Indisposi tion to come to Christ is, therefore, the true, and the only, difficul ty, which lies in our way. Those, who cannot come, therefore, are those, and those only, who will not. The words can and cannot, are used in the Scriptures, just as they are used in the common intercourse of mankind, to express toillingness or unwillingness. Thus we customarily say, that we cannot lend, or give, or assist, or pay a debt ; when we mean no thing more, than that we are disinclined to these offices. Thus Samuel says to God, How can Igo ? If Saul hear it, he will kill me. That Samuel could have gone to Bethlehem, if he had pleased, needs no proof. As soon as his fear of Saul, which had made him unwilling, was removed, he went without any difficulty. 1 Samuel xvi. 2. How can ihis man give us his fiesh? said the Jews to our Saviour : John vi. 52 ; that is. How can he be willing to give us his fiesh? This is a hard saying ^ zuho can hear it ? John vi. 60. The answer is. Every one that is willing. Can any manfortjid water, that these should not be baptized? Acts x. 47. Can ye drink of the cup, that I shall drink of? Mark x. 38. Can the children of the bride-chamber fast, zuhile the bridegroom is with them ? Mark ii. 19. Can a maid forget her ornaments ; or a bride her attire ? Jer. ii. 32. Cana woman forget her. sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb ? Isaiah xlix. 15. Can I hear any more the voice of singing men, and singing women ? 2 Sam. ii. 35. In all these, and the like, instances, there is plainly nothing meant, but inability of disposition, or a strong disinclination to the thing proposed. This is both the natural, and universal, language of men; found, equally, in their conversation and their writings. Children speak this language almost as soon as they begin to speak at all ; and on every such occasion, utter it more naturally, than any other language. If the Scriptures would be intelligible to the great body of mankind, they must speak in the same manner. In this manner therefore, God has directed them to be written. REMARKS. 1. From these observations it is evident, that the disobedience of mankind is their own fault. Wherever we understand the nature of our duty, and are hin dered from performing it by disinclination ohly. Conscience and Common sense pronounce us to be guilty. Thus they have evef pronounced. The decision has been given in all ages and coun tries ; in every conceivable form of language and conduct ; with an universal acknowledgment of its soundness; in the most de-» finite terms ; and with the highest soleranity. Yol. IV. 4 :^t; MAIN'S IN ABILITY TO [SER. C.\XXIH. 2. The degree ofour Inability lo obey the Divine Law does in no case lessen our guilt. Certainly he, who is more disinchncd to obedience, is not less guilty than he, who is less disinclined. Disinclination to obey, is our inability, and our sin. The greater our disinclination is, thc greater plainly, not the less, is our sin. 3. These observations teach us ihe propriety of urging sinners to immediate repentance. Their present state is a stale of extreme guilt and danger. Of this, it is the duty of every Minister to produce, as far as may bc, a strong conviction in their minds. Equally is it, his duty to show them, what is equally true, that they arc under the highest obliga tions to repent immediately. They arc now, they always have been, sinners. Every sin, of which they have been guilty, de manded their immediate repentance. The only reason, which they can allege for delaying their repentance, is thc very reason, why they have hitherto refused to obey the Divine Law : viz. their disinclination. But this is their sin : and sin is itself that, which demands their repentance, instead of being a justification of their delay. But it will be objected, that the sinner cannot, or in the very lan guage of this discourse, will not, repent of himself. Why, then, should he be urged to immediate repentance ? I will give the an swer. So long as the sinner feels himself in any degree excused in delaying this duty, there is every reason to fear, that he will be more and more at ease, and more and more disposed to delay. His views will be false, and dangerous ; and his conduct will ea gerly accord wilh his views. But a full conviction of his duty will create in him a sense of danger, a conviction of his guilt, and a trembling anxiety concerning his future being. In this situation he will naturally, and a!lmost necessarily, commence those efforts of solemn reflection, that deep attention to the word of God, and those attempts to supphcate for Mercy, that conviction of his help lessness, and that strong sense of the absolute necessity of being sanctified by the Spirit of Grace, which in the usual Providence of God, precede Regeneration. SERMON CXXXIV. taith and repentance necessary to restore tJS TO OBE DIENCE. Acts xx. 20, 21. — jlnd how I kept back ¦nothing, that was profitable unto you; but have shewed you, and have taught you publicly and from house to house ; testify ing, both to the Jews, and also to tlie Greeks, repentance toward God, and faith to ward our Lord Jesus Christ. In the preceding discourse, I examined the Inability of Mankind to obey the Divine Law. It is evident, that, if we are ever to be restored to Divine Favour, we must first be restored to a spirit of obedience. The Manner, in which we may obtain this restoration, becomes therefore the next subject of our inquiry. St. Paul, in the Context, declares to the Elders of the Church of Ephesus, and appeals to them for the truth of the declaration, that he had not shunned to declare the whole Counsel of God con cerning their salvation. This, he further asserts, he did, by teach ing them both pubhcly, and from house to house, at all seasons, and amid many temptations and sorrows. While he served the Lord with all humihty of mind, and many tears ; he confidently avers, that he kept back nothing, which was profitable unto them ; or, in other words, taught them every thing, which was profitable. Of course, he taught every thing which was profitable to man kind at large, as creatures of God, and candidates for immortality. All this, however, he sums up in the second verse of the Text in these two phrases : Repentance toward God, and Faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ, We are not, indeed, to suppose that, in the literal sense, St, Paul taught nothing but Faith and Repentance to the Ephesian Chris tians. There can be no reasonable doubt, that he taught the Ephesians, generally, what he taught the Christian world at large ; and, particularly, the things contained in the Epistle, which he wrote to the Church at Ephesus, The meaning of the declara tion in the Text is, I apprehend, merely that he had taught the doctrines concerning Faith and Repentance, as pre-eminently the means of salvation. That this view of the subject is just, is suffi ciently evident from the context. Here, the Apostle teaches the Elders, to whom his speech was addressed, many things beside these doctrines; and declares, that he had heretofore instructed them in the great duty of communicating good to others, as the amount of all that, which they owed to their fellow-men. The Religion of the Gospel is the religion of sinners : as the Religion of 28 FAITH AND RKPE.NT.^'CE [SER. CXXXIV. the Law is that of virtuous beings. The Gospel is a scheme of restoration to beings, who have rebelled against their Maker, and are condemned by the Law, which they have broken, to suffer the punishment due to their sins ; but who yet, in consistency with the Character and Government of God, may be forgiven. It is a scheme, by which these beings may be restored to their alle giance, to a virtuous character, audi lo the Divine favour. If such beings are ever lo be restored to the Favour of God ; if they are ever to obtain the privileges of good subjects of the Divine Gov ernment ; it is evident that they must, in sopne manner or other, be restored to the character of good subjects. In other words, if they are ever to possess the rewards of obedience, they must be pre viously possessed of the spirit of obedience. Whatever accom plishes for them, or becomes the means of accomplishing, this mighty change in their circumstances, must, to them, be of inesti mable ipiportance. As the Gospel contains the Religion of sin ners in the situation above mentioned; this importance must be long to the gospel. In a particular manner,, must it be attributable to such doctrines, or duties, in, the Gospel, as are peculiarly ne cessary, and absolutely indispensable. From the place, which Faith and Repentance held in the Preaching of St. Paul, it is plain, that they are the important things in question ; the immediate and indispensable means of our restoration to obedience, arid to the consequent enjoyment ofthe divine favour. This truth is abundantly exhibited in many forms throughout the different parts of the New Testament. In Mark i. 14, 15, is contained the following declaration : Now after John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galihe, preaching the Gospel of the King dom of God, and saying. The time is fulfilled; and the Kir^gdom of God is at hand. Repent ye, and believe the Gospel : or, as in the Greek, believe in the Gospel. In this passage we have evi dently the substance of Our Saviour's preaching : and this is Re pentance and Faith in the good tidings of the Divine Kingdopi, or the Glorious Dispensation of Mercy to sinners through the Re deemer. In Acts ii. 37, 38, we are inforttied, that the Jews, being pricked in their heart by the Preaching of St. Peter, particularly by his pungent exhibition of. their guilt in crucifying Christ, inquired of him and John with extreme solicitude, what they should do, to ob tain forgiveness and salvation. St. Peter answered them, Repent, and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of sins. To be baptized in the name of Christ is, as every one, who reads the Gospel, knows, a public and niost sol emn profession of Faith in Him, as the Redeemer of Mankind. St. Peter, therefore, in this answer, makes, in substance, the same declaration with that of St. Paul in the Text. When the jailer inquired of Paul and Silas, Acts xvi. 30, 31, What he should do to be saved ; they answered, Believe on the SEK. CXXXIV.] NECESSARV TO OBEDIENCE. ^9 Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shall be saved, wilh thine house. With out Faith, St, Paul declares, Hebrews xi. 6. it is impossible lo please God, tie that beliiveth on the Son, saith John the Baptist, John iii. 36, hath everlasting life. He that beUeveth not the Son, shall not see life : but the wrath of God abideth on him. He that believeth on him, saith Christ to fficddemus, John iii. 18, is not con demned ; but he that beUeveth not, is. condemned, already, Christ, in Matthew ix. 13, declares the end of his coming to be to call, not the righteous, but sinners, to repentance. When, there fore, sinners repent ; the end of Christ's coming is fulfilled. In Acts V. 31, He is said by St, Peter to be exalted as a Prince, and a Saviour, to give Repentance unto Israel, and remission of sins. Re mission of sins is, of course, consequent upon Repentance. In Acts xi. 18, it is said. Then hath God granted to the Gentiles Re pentance unto life. In 2 Cor. vii. 10, St, Paul declares, that Godly sorrow worketh repentance unto salvation, . Except ye repent, says Christ to his disciples, Luke xiii. 3, ye shall all likewise perish ; and again. There is joy in Heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, thai need no repent ance. Luke XV. 7. In these passages, and indeed in many others. Remission, Life, and Salvation, are indubitably, and inseparably, connected with Faith apd Repentance. Sometimes they are connected with both conjointly; and sometimes with one. The account, given ofthe subject, is, however, in all instances, the same ; because he, who possesses one of these Christian graces, is of course, and always, possessed of the others. On the contrary, vvilhout these, life, re mission, and salvation, are plainly declared to be unattainable. It is evident, therefore, that Faith and Repentance are the ' attri butes, supreiriely required by the Gospel ; the immediate fulfil ment of its two great precepts ; in the possession of which, mankind are assured of eternal life, and without which, they are exposed to efernal death. To produce, and perpetuate, them in. the soul, is visibly the great object, so far as man is concerned, which Christ came into the world to accomplish. In other words, they are that essential obedience to the Gospel, to which salvation is promised, and given, as a reward; not of debt, but of the free and sovereign grace of God. Having, if I mistake not, placed this truth beyond every rea sonable 4oubt, and thus shown the way, in which mankind, al though sinners. Condemned by the Divine Law, and incapable of Justification by their own works, may yet be gratuitously justified, return to their obedience, and be reinstated in the Divine favour ; I shall now endeavour to explain the nature of this subject ; and to exhibit the manner, in which the doctrine is true. The foundation of all Religion is the Existence, Character, Law, and Government, of God. This Glorious and Perfect Being, as the Creator, Preserver, and Benefactor, of the Universe, is, of the 30 FAITH AND REPENTANCE [SER. CXXXIV most a:bsolule right, the Ruler of the Work which He has made, and the Lawgiver of all his moral creatures. The Law, which He has prescribed to them, demands all their duty, and regu lates all their moral conduct, Man, who is of the number of these moral creatures, is placed under this Law ; and justly re quired by his Maker to love him with all the heart, and to love his neighbour as himself. In the progress of these discourses it has, unless 1 am deceived, been clearly shown, that Man has utterly failed of performing this duly ; that he is, iherefore, con demned by the Law, to the sufferance of its penalty ; that the Law knows no condition of pardon, escape, or return ; that Man cannot expiate his sins ; and that, if left lo himself, he must there fore perish. In this situation, as has been heretofore explained, Christ inter posed on the behalf of our ruined race ; and made an atonement for our sins, witb which the Father is well pleased. This atone ment, the Scriptures have assured us, God has accepted; and, having thus provided a method, in which he can be just, and yet justify those who were sinners, is ready to extend the blessings of pardon and salvation to this apostate world. Accordingly, Christ has announced himself to sinful men as their Saviour ; and proffered lo them dehverance, both from their sin, and their condemnation. The conditions, on which this proffer has been made, are Repentance towards God, and Faith towards Himself, as the Lord and Saviour of Mankind. In order lo un derstand, so far as we are able, the prppriety, and necessity, of these conditions of our restoration, it will be useful to attend to the following considerations. 1 . Sincere, exalted, and endearing happiness cannot be enjoyed by any beings, except those who are virtuous. This great and fundamental truth in that Philosophy, which ex plains the nature and interests of moral beings, has, it is believed, been completely evinced in this series of discourses. It has bepn shown, that a sinful mind is at war with itself, its fellow-creatures, and its God ; that it must, of course, be subject lb reproaches of con science, to perpetual disquiet, to consciousness of the Divine anger, and to the loathing and contempt of all good beings. It has been shown that such a mind must be a prey to tumultuous passions, ve hement desires, which are not and cannot be gratified, and endless disappoinlrnenls in the pursuit of a selfish interest, which can never be promoted without sacrificing the glory of the Creator, and the happiness of his creatures. It has been proved, that its chosen enjoyments are in their ria- ture vain, transient, delusive, little, base, and contemptible ; in consistent with real excellence, dignity, and self-approbation; and incompatible with the well-being of others ; whose interests are singly of equal importance, and, united, are immeasurably de serving of higher regard. 3ER. CXXXIV.] NECESSARY TO OBEDIENCE. 3} From these considerations it is unanswerably evident, that a sin ful mind cannot be happy : for with such affections, and their con sequences, happiness is plainly inconsistent. The mind, which is not at ease within, cannot derive happiness from without. A wounded spirit zuho can bear ; especially when wounded by the ar rows of an angry conscience ? If, then, God is pleased to com municate happiness lo him, who is a sinner ; it is indispensably ne- cessary,^ that he should first remove the sinful disposition, whence all these evils immutably flow. 2. The only possible method of removing sin from a moral being, is to make him ihe subject of Evangelical Repentance, So long as the soul loves sin, it raust be the subject of that vile and guilty character, which we denominate Moral Turpitude, De pravity, and Corruption ; together with all its consequences. For the love of sin is pre-emipenlly this character. While this love con tinues, he, in whom it exists, will perpetrate, of course, all those, which we customarily call sins, or sinful actions. He will also love sin, continually, more and more ; and perpetrate it with more and more eagerness, and hostility to God. From all the know ledge, which we possess of moral character, it seems plainly to be its nature, whether virtuous or vicious, to become more and more fixed in its habits, and intense in its desires. So long, therefore, as the love of sin prevails in the mind, the situation of the sinner must be hopeless, with regard to his assumption of a spirit of obe dience, and his attainment of consequent happiness. The Repentance of the Gospel is formed of the hatred of sin, sorrow for it, a disposition to confess it to God, and resolutions to renounce it, Frora this definition it is manifest, that Evangelical Repentance is the direct removal of sin from the soul of the sinner. By the hatred of sin, which it includes as a first principle, the soul is withdrawn from the practice of it. By the sorjpow, it is warned of the danger, and evil, of returning to it again. By the confession of it to God, the soul is brought into near, full, and most endearing views of the glorious goodness of its Heavenly Father in forgiving its iniquities; and most happily prepared lo watch, and strive, and pray, that it may offend Hira no more, by its resolutions to for sake it, the penitent is fortified against future indulgences, and pre pared to assume a life of filial obedience. In all these things we cannot, I think, avoid perceiving, that Evangelical Repentance is the direct, and the only, means of removing sin originally from the heart, and consequentially from the life, of a moral being ; and that thus it is absolutely necessary to prepare men for obedience to the law of God, and a general conformity to his character and pleasure. To such beings, as we are, it is therefore indispen sable, if we are ever to become the subjects of real and enduring happiness. 3. For this great end it is also necessary, that we should be united to God. 32 FAITH AND REPENTANCE [SER. CXXXIV. The relations between the Creator and his intelligent creatures, are not only near and important, but indispensable, also, to the happiness of such creatures. Out of them arises a great part of all the thoughts, affections, duties and enjoyments, of which they are capable. These are also the foundations, on which all other valuable thoughts, affections, duties, and enjoyments, rest ; and are necessary to their existence, as well as their worth. In the relation of Children, only, do we, or can we, apprehend the en dearing and glorious character of Jehovah, as the common, most affectionate, and most venerable Parent of the Virtuous Universe ; feel towards Him the various filial affections ; and perform the va rious filial duties, which are included under the general name of piety. In the sarae relation, only, can we enjoy the peculiar and pre-eminent happiness of loving and glorifying Him as our Father who is in Heaven, In this relation, only, do we also receive, and feel, the unnumbered proofs of his parental tenderness, and un limited mercy." As children of God, and by means of the filial views and affec tions, which in this character we entertain, we begin first to un derstand, and to feel, that we are brethren. This character is the true inlet to all the fraternal regards of virtuous beings ; and to the endless train of spiritual sympathies, and social endear ments, which spring up in sanctified minds ; and which with new strength, purity, and delight, will for ever grow and flourish in the Heavens above. But without Union to God, no relation, whether natural or moral, can be of any use to ourselves. Without this union, the blessings, flowing from these relations, cannot begin. When minds do not coincide with hira in their views, and are not united to him in their affections and character. He cannot with propriety give, nor they possibly enjoy, these blessings. The nearest re lation to God, if unperceived, unfelt, and unacknowledged, is in the apprehension of the soul, which sustains it nothing. It is fhe cordial, grateful sense of such a relation, the welcome, delightful recognition of it, which makes it the foundation of all this good. With such a sense, with such a recognition, the soul draws nigh to God with affections harmonizing with his pleasure, and with views coinciding with all his revealed designs. Separated from God, the soul can entertain no such views, and can feel no such affections, towards him. Nor can it perform any duties, nor real ize any rational, or lasting, enjoyment. In such a state of sepa ration, it is a plant, on which the beams of the Sun of Righteous ness cease to shine ; and is, of course, chilled, shrunk, and de stroyed. 4. Faith in Jesus Christ is the only possible Union between man and his Maker, God, in the Covenant of Rederaption, has promised to receive, justify, and save for ever, all who are Christ's at his appearing : SER CXXXIV.] NECESSARY TO OBEDIENCL, 33 that is, all who become his by a volunlaiy surrender of them selves to him. But the only method, in which man ever does, or can, surrender himself voluntarily to Christ, is the exercise of Faith or confidence in him, as the Saviour of the world. This is the only method of becoming His, which is proposed to us by Christ himself. Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, is the sole language of the Scriptures concerning this sub ject. On this, however, I need not insist ; because I nave here tofore, if I mistake not, satisfactorily proved the doctiine at large. Still it may be useful to consider the nature of the subject with some degree of attention, and particularity, as being capable, at least in my view, of illustrating the doctrine in an impressive and edifying manner. Christ offers to save sinners, who are condemned and perishing, and who ai-e therefore utterly unable to save themselves. In this offer he declares himself able, willing, and faithful, to save to the uttermost all that will come unto God by him, Novv it is impossible for us to corae to him, or to God by hira, unless we confide in this as his true character, and in the declarations, by vvhich he raakes this character known to us. It is impossible for us to receive his Instructions, as the means of knowledge, and guidance, to us in the path of duty and salvation ; his Precepts, as the rules of our obedience ; or his Ordinances, as tl\e directory of our worship ; unless we confide in the Character of Him, who has taught them as a wise and faithful Teacher. It is indispensable, that we con fide in him as a Teacher, who knows, and who has told us, that which is true, right, and safe for us, in these immensely iraportant concerns. It is indispensable, that we believe in hira, and trust in him, as vested with all the Authority, necessary to this charac ter of a Divine Instructor ; and regard him, as certainly and fully disclosing the Will of God concerning our duty and salvation. Un less we can confide in tiiese things, we can never receive his In- sti-uctions as rules either of our faith, or of our practice. With out these things they would all dwindle at once into mere philoso phy ; mere advice ; mere opinions ; to obey which, no person would, or could, feel the least obligation. His Atonement, in the same raanner, would be nothing to us unless we could cordially believe it to be efficacious, sufficient, and acceptable in the sight of God. It is only because we regard it as the Atonement of so glorious, sufficient, and acceptable a person, that it possesses, in any sense, the Chai-acter of an Atone ment. Accoi-dingly, the Socinians, who consider Christ as a mere man, generally do, and, if they would be consistent with them selves, must, beheve, that he made no Atonement, but was merely a martyr, or witness to the truth. Christ also requires us to commit our souls to his care, and keep ing; or, in other woi-ds, to becoriie his by voluntarily surrendering ourselves into his hands, and looking for safety and happiness to Vol. IV. 5 34 FAITH AND REPENTANCE [SER. CXXXIV his protection, mercy, and truth. This we cannot do in any other manner, nor by any other means, beside the exercise of Confidence in him. Who would commit his everlasting well-being to a per son, in whose kindness and truth, in whose power and wisdom, he did not confide ? No man ever did, or could commit himself, or his interests, even in this world, to any person whatever, unless in the exercise of confidence. How much more difficult, how con trary to the first principles of our nature, how absolutely impossi ble, must it then be to commit our eternal interests ; ourselves ; our all ; to a being, in whom we do not entirely confide ! In the exercise of Evangelical Faith, or Confidence, in the char acter of Christ, vve become united to him, according to the de clarations of the Scriptures, and according to all the views, which Reason can form of this subject, in a very near, most desirable, and most delightful union. He himself says to his disciples, John XV. 4, 5, lam the Vine;_ ye are the branches. Abide in me; aind 1 in you. As the brarich cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine ; no more can ye, except ye abide in me. St. Paul says, We are members ef his body, of his flesh, and of his bones : and again ; Now ye are the body of Christ, and members one of another ; 1 Cor. xii. 27; and again. Col. i, 18, He is the Head ofthe body, the Church. The whole Church, also, both in Heaven and on earth, is exhibited as gathered under one Head, that is, Christ : Eph. i. 10. But our Saviour himself has given us the most subljirie and glorious exhibition of this subject, which was ever made to man kind, in the following passage of his Intercessory Prayer : John xvii. 20 — 23, Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also, zuhich shall believe on me through their word: That they all may be one: as thou Father art in me, and lin thee ; that they also may be one in us : that the zuorld may beUeve, that thou hast sent me. And the glory, which thou gavest me, I have given them ; that they may be one, even as we are one ; I in ihem, and thou-in me : that they rhay be made perfect in one ; and that the world may knozu, thai thou hast sent me ; and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me. This trans cendent, this divine union, here exhibited to us as being of all pos sible importance, is, and can be, accomplished fq^ mankind, only by Evangelical Faith; or Confidence, in Christ. ¦ > 5'. To the happiness of the soul it is also indispensable, that it should always Obey its Creator ; and of this obedience. Evangelical Faith is the only source. That Obedience to God is necessary to the happiness of rational creatures, and that their uniform obedience is necessary to their uniform happiness, has been already proved under the first head of this discourse. If sin is fatal to happiness, and incompatible with its existence ; it follows of course, that obedience is indispen sable to happiness. Obedience and disobedience are the only two possible moral states of an Intelligent being. If, then, diso bedience creates misery ; obedience of course creates happiness. SER. CXXXIV.] NECESSARY TO OBEDIENCE. 35 It may, however, be useful to consider the subject somewhat further. It was shown in a forraer discourse, that God, and God only, knows what conduct will produce, or ensure, happiness ; and that He only is alway, invariably, and infinitely, disposed te have that conduct exist. He only possesses the authority also, and the power, to require it of his creatures. Hence, He only can be the uniform and efficient Director of his creatures to their real food. If, then, creatures are to be happy at all ; it is indispensa- ly necessary, that they obey his directions, and conform to his pleasure, as the only possible rule of right, the only possible way to real and universal good. All, who wander from this path, are soon lost in a wilderness of error, distress, and despair ; and will never find their proper home. But we cannot obey God, except from Confidence in his Char acter, as a perfectly Wise, Just, and Good Teacher and Lawgiver, who has instructed us in our true interest ; a Lawgiver, who has prescribed wise, just, and benevolent precepts, to regulate our duty. Unless we consider his precepts concerning all things to be right ; we can never voluntarily obey them. Confidence, there fore, in the Character of God, and in his Instructions and Pre cepts, as flowing from that Character, and partaking of his Wis dom and Rectitude, is the true, and only, possible source of that spontaneous obedience, which is acceptable to Him, virtuous in us, and indispensable to all our real good. Thus, if I am not deceived. Repentance towards God, and. Faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ, are the substance of the means, by which sinners are delivered from sin, reinstated in the character of children, restored to the favour of God, entitled to eternal life, and prepared for everlasting obedience and enjoyment in the hea- vens above. REMARKS. 1 .. From these observations it is evident, that the objections, made by Infidels against Evangelical Repentance, as mean-spirited and contemptible, are groundless, Mr, Hume observes, that " self-mortification, self-denial, and humility, stupify the understanding, sour the temper, and harden the heart." Whatever produces these consequences by its pro per efficacy is undoubtedly, in its nature, vicious pr sinful, since the consequences themselves are plainly of a sinful nature. Self- denial, self-mortification, and humility, are all essential ingredients of genuine repentance ; and without them, such repentance can not exist. A just, clear, and hurable sense of our guilt and un worthiness, is the very basis ori which every thing else, contained in repentance, is founded. With such a sense of our character, it is impossible that we should not endeavour to mortify those inclina tions, and deny ourselves that gratification of them, which, togeth er, have constituted our guilt, our odiousness, our debasement, and 36 FAITH AND REPENTANCE [SER. CXXXIV our danger. The hurable thoughts which we thus experience, and the humble emotions by which they are accompahied, are the only just thoughts concerning our character, and the only proper emotions with respect to ourselves, so far as this character exists. Every opinion, every feeling, not accordant with these, is false and groundless ; the silly dream of a vain and silly mind. A little self-knowledge, a very liraited degree of candour, united with a very raoderate self-examination, would convince any mind of the visionary nature of such opinions,! and the absolute impropriety of such feelings. Proud and vain men have, however, always despised humility, and regai-ded it as deserving their contempt. Still, it is unquestiona bly the first honour, which belongs fo our nature, and the begin ning of every thing else, which is really honourable in man. All sin is shame : and, let it be remembered, there is nothing shame ful, except sin. The very pride, the very vanity, from which these decisions of Infidels spring, is itself gross sin, and not less shame ful than the other exercises of the same spirit. All men see, and declare, this under the guidance of mere common sense ; and, al though each cherishes it in himself, every one hates, despises, and condemns it in his fellow-men. How httle would Christ have merited, how plainly impossible would it have been for him to have gained, that exalted estimation, which he now holds in the minds of Angels and of men, had he been a proud and vain, and not a meek and lowly. Redeemer! How infinitely distant is the character of this Glorious Person from that of Alexander, or that of Ccesar ! The character of these men is fitly imaged by the smoke, ascend ing from the bottomless pit : while the aspect of the Saviour is that of the Sun, shining in his strength. But, aside from these considerations. Repentance, however re probated by haughty-rainded raen, is in itself real good, and es sential to all other real good. It is the only possible reraoval of sin ; the worst of all evils, and the source of every other evil. It is the ohly possible security against the resumption of that guilty, debased, and shameful character. It is the commencement of vir tue in the soul ; and indispensable to its very existence. It is real dignity in itself ; and the beginning of all real dignity. It is plainly the only solid basis of peace of conscience, and well-found ed self-approbation. By Hume it was seen, so far as he saw it at all, only at a distance ; and through the false optics of philosoph ical pride. It was, therefore, erroneously seen. Understood, and represented. Neither this writer, nor his companions in infideli ty, appear to have discerned the distinction between the repent ance of a raercenary slave, regretting his faults merely from the expectation of punishment ; and the ingenuous contrition of a child, sorrowing for his disobedience, loathing his guilt, and returning with a new and better heart to his filial character and duty. SER. CXXXIV.] NECESSARY TO OBEDIENCE. 37 2. We see how groundless the objection of Godwin is to the Scrip tures ; viz. That they lay an improper and unwarrantable stress on Faith. Faith, it is well known, is the great condition of acceptance with God, proposed in the Gospel : as Unbehef is of final rejec tion. To this scherae Gorftuin objects, as unreasonable and absurd. But if the account here given of this attribute bc just, the absurd ity will be found to lie, not in the Scriptural scheme, but in the objection. It has, if I mistake not, been shown in this discourse, that without Union to God, and cordial Obedience to his Will, we cannot enjoy rational and enduring good ; and that without Evan gelical Faith, no such Union, and no such Obedience, can exist. The Faith of the Gospel is, tlierefore, of all possible importance to man ; of as much importance as his whole well-being ; involv ing every thing which is desirable or useful. Had the Scriptures, therefore, laid less stress upon this subject ; it would have been an unanswerable objection to the religious system, which they contain. The contrary character of distrust, which is plainly the native character of man, is obviously a complete separation of any In telligent being from his Maker. It is impossible, that such beings should exercise any of those affections, with which alone they can glorify their Creator, or cordially obey him, so long as they distrust his Moral Character. Equally impossible is it, that they should possess the enjoyment, which alone can fill the wishes, or is suited to the nature, of an immortal mind. The distrust of a friend makes us unhappy here. The distrust of God would make us miserable for ever. The Faith of the Gospel deserves, then, all the importance, which is given to it by the Scriptures. The place, which it ought to hold in the estimation of all men, is pre-eminent. By every Preacher it ought to be insisted on, by every man it ought to be jDursued, as of all possible consequence to Obedience and Salva tion. The Preacher, who does not thus inculcate it, is unfaithful : the man, who does not acquire it, is undone. SERMON CXXXV. THE MEANS OF GRACE. ORDINARY MEANS OF GRACE.^ — PROOFS THAT THERE ARE SUCH MEANS. 1 Corinthians iv. 15. — For though ye have ten thousand instructors in Christ, ye have not many fathers ; for in Christ Jesus have I begotten you through the Gospel. The preceding sermon finished the observations, which I originally proposed to raake concerning the Law of God; the Inability of Man to obey it ; and the Means of his Restoration to Obedience, and to the consequent Favour of God, The next subject in the order of these Discourses, is The means, in the application of which, men usually obtain faith and repentance, and thus become entitled to eternal life. Before I begin the discussion of this subject, I request my Audi ence to call to mind the import of the last discourse, together with others, which have been delivered concerning the same subjects; I wish it to be remembered, that, iri my view. Evangelical Faith and Repentance are indispensable io ihe existence of any moral good in the soul of man, and are in all instances the beginning of that good. Particularly, they are the commencement of obedience to the Law of God ; the foundation of real and enduring happiness to such as are, or have been, sinners ; and are, obviously, the im mediate duly of all raen. He therefore, vvho does not teach these doctrines, omits, in my apprehension, the soul and substance of the Gospel. With these things premised, lobserve, that in this passage of Scripture, St. Paul declares himself to have begotten the Corin thian Christians in Christ, and thus to have been a cause pf their being regenerated, or born again. That the new birth is the birth here referred to, will not be disputed. Nor can it be questioned, that St. Paul was, in some manner and degree, or other, concerned in effectuating it, without a peremptory denial of his veracity, and inspiration. It is further declared by hira, that he had begotten them through the Gospel. It is therefore certain, that the Gospel, also, was, in some or other manner, or degree, concerned in effect uating the new birth of the Corinthian Christians. If the Apostle, as a Minister of the Gospel, was concerned in effectuating the new birth of the Corinthian Christians ; it will fol low by unobjectionable analogy, that other Ministers are also, in the like manner or degree, concerned in Effectuating the Regeneration of SER. CXXXV.] PROOFS, kc, 39 such, as become Christians under iheir Ministry. Further ; if the Gospel was thus concerned in the Regeneration of the Corinthian Christians, then it is, also, equally concerned in that of Christians in general. But if Ministers of the Gospel be in any manner, or degree, concerned in producing this change in the moral character of men, they are just so far means of producing it. Of consequence, also, they are, according to that course of Divine Providence, in which they are thus instrumental, necessary to this change, just so far as they are means of producing it. It is not here intended, that God could not, if he pleased, pro duce this change in the human character, without these, or any other means. Nor is it intended, that in some cases he cloes not actually thus produce it. It is unquestionably in the power of God to effectuate this change, with infinite ease, in any manner which he shall think proper. Nor have we any proof, that he has not, in many instances, renewed men, without connecting the ren ovation with any means whatever.. But it is here intended, that this is not the usual course of his Spiritual providence ; and that, in that course, means are really eraployed to bring men into the heavenly kingdom. It is further intended, that these means are so far necessary, as thai without them, this important end would not, in the ordinary course of providence, be accomplished. If God has thought proper td x:onduct his Spiritual providence in such a manner, as to constitute it a regular and orderly course of events ; then our own views of it are to be formed, so as to ac cord with this constitution, and to admit it as a part of the Evan gelical System. Our conduct, also, is to be referred, and con formed, to this constitution. With it we are to expect other things to accord. Particularly, we are to expect salvation for ourselves, and others, according to this plan ; and not according to a differ ent one. Just views of this subject will, therefore, be easily seen to claim no small importance in the estimation of those, who wish to be saved. In the particular investigation of this subject, I propose, I. To shozB, ihat there are Means of Grace ; II. To show What they are ; III. To explain iheir Influence ; and, IV. To answer the principal Objections to this scheme of doc trine. I. / shall attempt to show, that there are Means of Grace. This position I shall endeavour to establish in the following manner. . 1. / allege as evidence of its truth the direct declarations of Scripture. The Text is an explicit and forcible declaration of this nature. In this passage the Apostle asserts in the most unequivocal man ner, that he was a cause, and the Gospel another, of regeneration 40 PROOFS THAT THERE ARE [SER. CXXXV. to the Corinthian Christians : not a cause in the efficient sense, but the instrumental. In other words, he declares that himself, and the Gospel, were Means of their regeneration. It cannot be said here, that the Apostle and the Gospel were, to these Christians, means of edification ; or of their advancement in holiness, after they were regenerated. This subject is not even hinted at in the pas sage. The birth is not any part of the growth, subsequent to itself. To beget, is not to nourish, or cause to grow. It is to contribute to the original existence of the thing begotten, and not to its sub sequent improvement. The Apostle and the Gospel, then, con tributed to the regeneration of these Christians, and were Means of bringing it to pass. In Philemon 10, St. Paul declares the same truth in the same language. / beseech thee for my son Onesimus, whom I have be gotten in my bonds. In the Epistle of St. James, chapter i. 1 8, that Aposde says. Of his own Will begat he us with ihe Word of Truth, that we (the first converted Jews) should be a kind of first fruits of his crea tures. On this passage I shall make two reraarks. The first is, that St. James uses the same language to denote the regeneration qf the Jewish Christians, which St. Paul uses to denote that of the Corin thian Christians. If, then, the terms in St. James denote regene ration ; which will not be denied ; they denote the same thing in the Text. But the passage in St. James is unquestionable proof, that God regenerated the persons spoken of in this passage. Equally undeniable proof is furnished by the Text, that St. Paul was either the Agent, or the Means, of regeneration to the Chris tians in Corinth. But God is the only Agent, or Efficient Cause, of regeneration. If we deny the fact, that St. Paul was the Means of regeneration to these persons, as asserted in the Text, we must, according to the same principles, deny the fact, that God was the Efficient Cause of regeneration, as asserted by St. James. The same rules of construction will oblige us to admit both these propo sitions, or to reject them both. The language is the same ; and that it ought to be interpreted by the same rules, of construction, cannot be doubted. The second remark is this. St. James declares, that God had regenerated him, and his Fellow-christians, hy the Word of Truth : that is, by the Gospel. The Gospel was, therefore, certainly. Means of accomphshing this event. St. Peter, in his first Epistle, chapter i. 10 ; speaking of himself and those to whom he wrote, says. Being born again, or regenerat ed, not of corruptible seed. But hy the Word of God, who liveth and abideth for ever. In this passage St, Peter declares, that Christians are born, or regenerated, 5ia Xoyx, by means of the Word of God. Of course he declares, that they were not regen erated without the instrumentalitv of the Word of God. What SER. CXXXV.] MEANS OF GRACE 41 is true, with respect to this subject, of the Christians, to whom St. Peter wrote, will not be denied to be true of Christians uni versally. In 1 Tim. iv. 16, St. Paul says. Take heed unto thyself, and un to the doctrines ; continue in them : for in so doing thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee. That Timothy would, in fact, both save himself, and those who heard him, cannot be denied, un less we charge St. Paul with falsehood. But if Timothy was not in this case an Instrument, or a Means, of salvation to them ; the declaration cannot be true. For, God is the only Efficient Cause of salvation to any man. In Romans iii. 1, 2, St. Paul says. What advantage then hath the Jew ? or what profit is there of circumcision ? Much every way : chiefiy because that unto them were committed the Oracles of God. In this passage St. Paid declares, that the Jeztis had much advan tage over the Gentiles ; and that this advantage lay chiefiy in the fact, that unto them were committed the Oracles of God. If the pos session of the Oracles of God was of great advantage to the Jews : we naturally ask, in what respect was it an advantage ? Plainly inthis ; that the Orat;les of God contributed, or were capable of contributing, to their salvation, and consequently to thefr regene ration. Of what possible advantage could the Oracles of God be to unconverted men ; and of such only is the Apostle here speak ing ; unless they contributed in some manner and degree, or oth er, to thefr conversion ? This question, it is believed, admits of no answer. In Romans x. 1 4, the sarae Aposde says. How then shall they call on Him, in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him, of whom they have noi heard; and how shall they hear without a Preacher ? Every person, at all acquainted with lan guage, knows, that these questions have exactly the same import with that of strong negative declarations ; and that the Apostle has here in the most forcible manner asserted, that men cannot call on Him, in whom they have not believed ; nor believe in him, of whom they have not heard, nor hear without a Preacher. In other words, he declares the Preaching of the Gospel to be, in the or dinary course of Providence, indispensably necessary to the faith of mankind in Christ, just as that faith is indispensable to the invo cation of his name in prayer. That the Apostle understood these questions in this manner is unanswerably evident from his own conclusion, subjoined in the 1 7th verse : So then, faith cometh by hearing ; and hearing by the Word of God, These passages, it is believed, are sufficient, if any passages can be sufficient, to decide the question. It would be easy to multiply quotations of the same import, to a great extent : for this is thc common language of the Scriptures. But as a long course of quot ing, and commenting, necessarily becomes tedious, I shall conclude this part ofthe discussion bv repeating, in a verv summarv man ^'OL, IV. "6 42 PROOFS THAT THERE ARE [SER. CXXXV ner, a few other passages, and phrases, which directly indicate, in other forms, the same truth. The Scriptures are called the Word of Salvation; the Word of Ufe ; the Word of Faith ; the Word of Wisdom ; the Word of Knowledge ; the Word of Reconciliation ; and the Sword of the Spirit, None of these appellations, it is apprehended, could be given to them with propriety, unless they were in truth Means of Salvation to men. They are called the Word of God, which in- zurought effectually in the Thessalonians, when they first received it, 1 Thess. ii. 13. They are said by God himself, speaking to the Prophet Jeremiah, to be as a fire, and as a hammer, that breaketh the rock in pieces, Jer. xxiii. 29. They are asserted by St. Paul to be quick, or living, and powerful ; sharper than any two-edged sword ; piercing even to the dividing asunder of the soul and spirit ; and to he a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart. Heb. iv. 12.- Our Saviour says to the Jews, It is the Spirit that quick eneth; and, to explain his meaning, subjoins. The words that I speak unto you, they are Spirit, and they are life. It is said, that, zuhen the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleas ed God by the foolishness of preaching to save ihem who believe. 1 Cor. i. 21. St. Paul declares the Gospel to be the power of God unto saHa- tion to every one that believeth.' Rom. i. 10. Frora these passages it is evident, that the Scriptures, in their custoraary language, declare themselves, particularly as preached to mankind, to be means of salvation. 2. / argue the same doctrine from the Commission, given hy Christ to his Apostles. This Coipmission is recorded, Matth. xxviii. 19, in these words : Go ye, disciple (that is, make disciples of) all nations; baptizing them in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. The word, it.oAips^idaTB, rendered teach in the comraon translation, is literally rendered disciple. AiSaixu is the proper terra to denote teaching. Ma^ijTEuw denotes to make a person a disciple, in the same sense, in which the Apostles, and their contemporary Christians, were disciples of Christ. A disciple, as the term is used in the New Testament, is a person, who receives, approves, and voluntarily conforms to the doctrines and precepts of his Instructor. Such were the disciples of the Pharisees : such were those of John the Baptist : and such were those of Christ. Christ, it will be admit ted, commissioned the Apostles to make real disciples of those, to whom they preached, and not disciples in pretence and profession merely. But eVery real disciple is regenerated. The nations to whom the Apostles were sent, were Jews and Heathen; and of course, were unbeli€vers and sinners. Christ, therefore, commissioned the Apostles to make disciples of unbe lievers and sinners. It will not be denied that he commissioned SER. CXXXV.] MEANS OF GRACE. 43 them to do that, which, ui the ordinary progress of things, could be done ; and wliich they, so far as they faithfully obeyed his com mands, did actually accomplish. The Apostles, therefore, did really in the proper sense make disciples of these sinners. Accordingly, St, Paid says, that he desired to have fruit among the Romans, as he had had among the other Gentiles. Rom. i. 13. He speaks of hunself, and Apollos, as Ministers, by whom, that is, by means of whom, the Corinthians believed. 1 Cor. iii. 5. He says, that he, and his companions, received grace and apostleship, for the obedience of faith among all nations. Rom. 1.5. St. Peter, Acts XV. 7, says, that God had chosen, that the Gentiles hy his mouth shoidd hear the Gospel, and believe. Every where, also, in the book of Acts, both Jews and Gentiles are exhibited as hairing be lieved and turned to God, by means of the Preaching of the Apos tles and their coadjutors. Thus the Commission was fulfilled, exactly, according to its tenour ; and the Gospel actually became the Means of faith and salvation to those, to whom it was preached. But this Commission was given to all succeeding Ministers, as well as to the Apostles; and is the very authority, under which they now preach and perforra all the other duties of the ministerial office. All that was here said to the Aposdes, is, in the very same sense, said to them. It is equally their business, and duty, to make disciples of mankind, wherever Providence presents them an op portunity; and to baptize them when made. Of course, they as really make disciples of unbehevers and sinners ; and are as really Means of faith and salvation to mankind. The very fact of giving this Commission is, in itself, decisive proof of this truth. It was undoubtedly given with sincerity, and benevolence, on the part of Christ. Of course, it was intended by him, that the design, expressed in it, was really formed in his mind, and will be faithfully accomplished. This design is com pletely expressed in the Commission itself. As the Aposdes were directed to disciple all nations, or to make disciples every where ; so it Was the design of Chi-ist, that disciples should every where be made by them. In this business they were to have a real agency. It therefore follows irresistibly, that they had a real agen cy in it : such an agency, as that without thefr exertions, these men would, in the established course of things, never have become disciples. 3. The same doctrine is proved by the whole course of Facts relating to the existence and progress of Christianity in the world. Wherever the Gospel has been preached, and read, mankind have actually been made disciples of Christ. In every age, and in every country, to which the Gospel has come, there have been many such disciples. In those countries, on the contrary, where the Gospel has not existed, such disciples have not been made ; or. at least, evidence of their discipleship has not been furnished 44 PROOFS THAT THERE ARE [SER. CXXXV. to their fellow-men. I. speak here, it will be remembered, of the ordinary course of God's Spiritual providence. That exceptions to this assertion may have existed, I am not disposed to deny. That they must have been coraparatively few is, I think, clearly evident from the fact, that no satisfactory reasons have appeared, even to the mind of charity itself, to believe them numerous. If God has pursued, in countries unenlightened by the Gospel, a dif ferent system of dispensations from that which we have been con templating ; it must be admitted, that we have no evidence of this fact ; or at least none which can be pronounced satisfactory. The Scriptures certainly give us very little information of this nature ; and the history of mankind furnishes still less. Without limiting the mercy of God, or attempting to investigate his Spiritual provi dence, with respect to nations who have not the Gospel, it may safely be concluded, that the instances, which they furnish, of ap parent renovation, are very few. A benevolent man, who casts his eye over the Western wilder ness, and surveys with attention the moral conduct of its inhabit ants, will find very little, of this nature, to satisfy his wishes, or his hopes. Independently of the moral effects, produced upon these nations by the labours of Missionaries, he will find sin prevailing, and ravaging, in all the forras of turpitude, corapatible with their circumstances, and in every degree, not forbidden by their poverty, ignorance, and imbecility. Our Saviour has taught us, tbat we are to discern the character of men by their fruits. This equita ble and decisive rule of judging is no less applicable to these na tions, than to ourselves. But what are the fruits, produced by these men ? Certainly they are not such, as are meet for repent ance ; such as spring from confidence in God ; such as indicate, even remotely, the influence, or even the existence, of real virtue. After the most charitable and indulgent allowance for their igno rance ; after all the palliations, vvhich the most benevolent mind can elicit from their moral disadvantages ; their fraud, treachery, cruelty, pride, implacability, and revenge, present a picture of de pravity, which it is impossible not to understand, and acknowledge. No penitents, in the mean tirae, are visible among them. No symptoms of reformation are found. On the contrary, one unva rying, sluggish, gloomy stream of corruption appears to have flowed heavily onward from remote generations to the present hour ; and to wind its Lethean course through all these nations, wherever, and however, situated. On the ground, once inhabited by these people, the New-Eng land Colonists have dwelt almost two centuries. Among them Rehgion has generally prevailed. The proof is that which has been already mentioned. They have brought forth the fruits, specified in the Gospel as evidences of a virtuous character, in instances, whose nuraber it would be difficult to limit. Whence this mighty difference in nations, planted on the same soil, and SER. CXXXV.] MEANS OF GRACE. 45 living under the same chmate ? The only satisfactory answer is, that the people of JVkai-Ewgtenrf have possessed the Gospel audits Ordinances; have built Churches ; settled Ministers ; attended the Public Worship of God; read the Scriptures ; and educated their children in the nurture and admonition of ihe Lord, None of these things were possessed, or done, by their savage predecessors. In a word, the people of New-England have had the Gospel : the Savages have not. In those countries, also, where the Gospel has been enjoyed, and disciples have actually been made, all, or almost all, persons of this character have becorae disciples by means of the Gospel itself. Such persons, with scarcely an exception, probably without an exception, when conversing on their regeneration, declare that every thing in their own minds, whick yields them consolation, or hope, is, in their view, fairly referrible to the truths of the Gospel, presented to them in some forra or other^ A vast multitude date all their hopes from the Preaching of the Gospel; and feel com pletely assured, that faith, if it has come to them at all, has come by hearing ; as hearing has by the Word of God. Others attribute this blessing to the indirect influence of Preaching, operating upon thefr minds through a succession of events. .Others ascribe it to an early Religious Education, making deep impressions on their minds in the happy period of childhood. Others, still, attribute it to the Reading of the Scrfptures ; to the Reading of Religious Books ; to the Rehgious Conversation of Good Men ; or to the Life and Conduct of such men. In these several ways, the truths of the Gospel are often exhibited with peculiar strength, beauty, and ef ficacy. The mode, in which tibiey are conveyed to the mind, is of no other importance, than as it renders the truths themselyes more explicit, or more impressive. The truths are the substance, and the soul, of this interesting process. As the language of all such persons concerning this subject is the same ; it must, I think, be admitted to be true. Their number has been too great to allow the suspicion, that they can all have been deceived. They have lived in so many ages, and countries have been of so many different characters, have received so wide ly different educations, have lived in so widely, different circum stances, and have entertained, in other respects, so widely differ ent opinions, as to render it incredible, that they should all have been prejudiced concerning this subject, and impossible, that they should have united in exactly the same set of prejudices. At the same time, multitudes of thera have been eminently distinguished for wisdom, candour, and self-knowledge. It cannot be reasona bly supposed, that immense numbers of such raen should^ with re spect to such a subject, be uniformly deceived in exactly the same manner. Beyond all this, it appears, at least to me, to be an in defensible imputation upon the character of God to suppose, that he would, in this case, leave his children to false apprehensions, 46 PROOFS THAT THERE ARE [SER. CXXXV and suffer them universally to believe, that this mighty blessing came to them all in a way, which was imaginary, and by means, to which it was in no degree attributable. From these considerations it may, I think, with the highest pro babihty be concluded, that mankind are sanctified through, or by means of, the truth of God. To all that has been here alleged it may, however, be objected, that in the Scriptures our sanctification, particularly our regenera tion, is ascribed directly, and solely, to the agency of the Holy Ghost ; and that the doctrine, contended for in this discourse, contradicts this part of the Scriptural scheme. To this objection 1 answer, that the doctrine, for which I con tend, is as plainly asserted, and in as many passages of the Scrip tures, as that, which is alleged in the objection. If, then, we deny the former of these doctrines ; we shall do violence to as many, and as plain, scriptural declarations, as if we deny the latter. Our dislike to the doctrine, asserted in this discourse, will in no degree justify us in rejecting, or contravening, those passages of Scrip ture, in which it is asserted. They stand upon their own basis ; the authority and inspiration 6f that Divine Spirit, who, while he challenges this Agency to Himself, has been pleased to attribute also this Instrumentality to' his Word. His declarations w& are bound to receive as we find thera ; and cannot alter the obvious meaning, with any better warrant, than we can challenge for alter ing the words, which contain that meaning. It may be further objected, that this doctrine robs God of his pe culiar glory in regenerating the soul ofman. To this I ariswer, that we are, at the best, incompetent judges of this subject ; and are therefore unable to determine, satisfac torily, in what manner God will be most glorified.' If God has thought proper to give us such, an account of the subject, as has been here specified, it will be found in the end, that he is more glorified in the manner, conformed to these declarations, than in any other. The Psalmist, under the unerring influence of Inspi ration, says to God, Thou hast magnified thy Word above- all thy Name. Should it prove one of the ways, in which God magnifies his Word, that it is constituted the Means of regeneration to man-; kind ; there, can be no reasonable doubt, that it will be found, in the end, perfectly cpnsistent with the most perfect glorification of his Name. The truth, however, is, that neither of these answers is at all ne cessary to satisfy us concerning these objections. The Spirit of God is, in truth, the only Agent in renovating man ; or, in other words, the only Efficient cause of his renovation. This, how ever, he would be in as perfect a degree, if he were supposed to employ Means in accomplishing this change of character, as if he were supposed to accomplish it without them. The suppositiori; that an agent, if he employ means to effectuate his purposes, will, SER. cxxxv.] MEANS OF GR.\CE. 4? on this account, cease to be, or be at all less, an agent, is built up on no known principles of truth or evidence. The farmer and gardener turn their soil, and plant their seeds : the rain descends upon them,, and the sun shines : but all these things do not make them spring up and yield their increase. God must still interpose with his creative power, to produce these de sirable effects ; or a crop will be expected in vain. God, there fore, is the sole Agent and Author of the crop ; yet the farmer and the gardener, the ground and the seed, the rain and the sunshine, are all Means of its existence. Without these means, there would, according to the established order of things, be no crop. Of course, they are means of its existence.; and means indispensable. It may be said, that these cases are not similar. If this should be said ; it would, I think, be said raishly : for Christ himself, St. Peter, St. James, and St. Paul, have all chosen this allusion to illustrate this very subject. See the parable of the sower. See also, 1 Cor. iii. where Paul declares himself to have planted, Apollos to have watered, and God to have given the increase. With regard to the other objection, it is obvious, that, so far as we can see, the glory of regenerating man is all ascribed to God ; and all ascribed in the manner most honourable to him; is attri buted to his Spirit as the Efficient cause, and to his Word as the Means. If he has in fact, as, if I mistake not, I have proved, de clared that this is the manner, in which he has chosen to accoraplish this work ; we need not fear, that in giving this account of it we shall detract from his character. ^ REMARK. If the scheme of discourse, which has been here exhibited, is just ; it will follow, that the Gospel is ta be preached to sinners. My audience may, perhaps, wonder that any evidence should be thought necessary to prove this assertion. If I am not misinform ed, however, the assertion has not only been questioned, but de nied. That such should have been the fact is certainly wonder ful, in my view, as well as in that of others. When the Gospel was first preached by Christ, the whole world, with very few exceptions, was in a state of sin. The Gentiles were so generally of this character, that, as a body, they were styled, by St. Paul, sinners of the Gentiles. Gal. ii. 15. To the Gentiles, however, Paul was sent directly by Christ, to preach the Gospel. The extraordinary commission of this Apostle deserves to be here repeated. Delivering thee from the people, andfirom ihe Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee ; To open their eyes, and to turn 'them from darkness to light, andfirom the power of Satan unto God; that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them who are sanctified by faith that is in me. Acts. xxvi. 17, 18. Here it is to be remarked, that St. Paul was sent to the Gen tiles, not only to preach the Gospel, and to open their eyes, but lo 48 PROOFS THAT THERE AREiiC. [SER. CXXXV, turn them,, also, from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God. Accordingly, he was not disobedient unto the heavenly vision; but shewed first to them of Damascus, and at Jeru salem, and throughout all the coasts of Judea, and then to the Gen tiles, that they should repent, and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance. These declarations made by St. Paul, are unanswerably evinced to be true by the history of his life. In the very manner, here recited, he preached to both Jews and Gentiles the glad tidings of salvation ; and persuaded men every where to renounce, and for sake, their iniquities; and thus actually opened their eyes, and turned them from darkness to hght. The beginning of the Preaching of Christ, as recited in the Gos pel according to St. Mark, is in these words : The time is fulfilled: the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand. Repent ye, and believe the Gospel. The people, therefore, whom he addressed, had not hitherto repented, nor believed. Of course they were sinners. In the whole history contained in the Gospel, and in the Acts, there is not, so far as I recollect, a single instance recorded, in which we have any satisfactory proof, that even an individ ual sinner was regenerated without the influence of Divine Truth upon, his heart. On the contrary, these writings are full of ex amples, in which the efficacy of this Truth is asserted directly, as having been indispensably concerned in producing this change in man.The same doctrine is, also, amply exhibited, as it respects the Jewish Church. Of the Priests, the ordinary Ministers of that Church, whose proper office it was to teach the Scriptures to the Israelites, God says, in the Prophet Malachi, The Law of Truth was in their mouth ; and they turned ma'ny away from iniquity. This declaration is a complete history ofthe fact in question, so far as the present subject is concerned, throughout all the preceding ages of the Jewish Church. What was true concerning the periods, contained in the Scrip tural history, has been equally true, so far as we have any inform ation of the periods, which have since elapsed. Ministers have every where, and in every age of the Christian Church, preach ed to sinners : and sinners under their preaching have been turned to God. In all these facts the duty of Ministers, at the present time, is distinctly seen, and gloriously encouraged. He who would preach as the Priests preached, as Christ preached, as the Apostles preached, will proclaim the tidings of salvation to siriners ; and will urge thern unceasingly to Faith, Repentance, and Holiness. Upon his preaching, if faithfully conducted in this manner, and accompanied by his own prayers, and those ofthe Christians around him, he may confidendy look for the blessing of God. SERMON CXXXVI. THE ORDINARY MEANS OF GRACE. — 'WHAT THEY ARE. AND WHAT IS THEIR INFLUENCE 1 CoRiHTHiANS iv. 15. — For though ye hdve ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers ; for in Christ Jesus have I begotten you through the Gospel. IN the last discourse, I attempted to prove, that there are Means of Grace and Salvation: the ffrst subject, then proposed for dis cussion. I shall now endeavour, II. To shew What they are ; and, III. To explain their Infiuence. The Means of Grace may be distributed into a greater or less number of divisions, without any material disadvantage. At the present time, it will, however, be useful to mention only- those, which are of peculiar importance. Of these, the Gospel, by which I here intend the Scriptures at large, is ever to be regarded as the sum : for it plainly involves them all. The Gospel is especially to be considered as being efficacious to salvation, when it is preached : this being that insti tution of God, to which His peculiar blessing, life for evermore, is. especially annexed in the Gospel itself. Still, it is ever to be re membered, that in every lawful, serious use of its insfructions, precepts, warnings, threatenings, invitations, and promises, it is possessed of the same general nature, and influence. When we speak of the Means of grace, in the plural, we al ways intend either different modes of applying the Gospel, or some or other of its Precepts, or Ordinances, to the human Understand ing, or Affections ; or the performance of some ad, or series of acts, enjoined in the Scriptures. It will be proper further to observe, that the phrase, which I have here used, is coraraonly eraployed to denote, both the Means by which in the us'ual course of providence, grace is originally ob tained ; and the Means of increasing it, when once obtained. Under this head are included, I. The Preaching of the Gospel ; II. The Reading of the Scriptures ; III. Prayer; IV. Correspondence with religious men', V. Religious Meditation; particularly Self-Examination'; and VI. The Religious Education of Children. To these may be added, as efficacious to the same end, although differing in several respects from all those already mentioned, the Voi. IV. 7 50 THE MEANS OF GRACE: [SER. CXXXVI. instructive and monitory, the merciful and afflictive. Dispensations of Divine Providence io ourselves and others. It ought to be re membered, that 1 consider none of these as Means of Grace, in any other sense, than as they display, and impress upon the mind, the Truth of God. In the Scriptures, all these things appear to sustain the char acter, which I have attributed to them. The Laztt of the Lord, says David, is perfect ; converting ihe soul : The testimonies of the Lord are sure ; making wise the sim ple. Search the scriptures, says our Saviour to the Jews, for in them ye think ye hdve the words of eternal life. How shall they be lieve, says Si. Paul, in hiin, of whom they have not heard? and how shall ihey hear without a preacher ? So then. Faith cometh by healing ; and hearing by the Word of God. God be merciful to me a sinner, said the Publican, who went up to the temple to pray : and our Saviour informs us, that he went down to his house, justified rather than the pharisee. He thatzvalketh with wise men, says Solo mon, shall be wise. Examinfi yourselves, says St. Paul, whether ye he in the faith ; prove your own selves : know ye not your own selves ; hozu that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobate ? This ex hortation is obviously given to persons, supposed by the Apostle to be, individually, of different moral characters ; and is plainly given to them all, whatever their character might be. Stand in awe, said David to his enemies, and sin not : commune with your own heart upon your bed ; andhe still. Keep thy heart, said David io Solomon, with all diligence ; for out of it are ihe issues of Iif e. Train up a child in the way he should go ; says Solomon, and when he is old, he zuill not depart from it : and again. The reproofs of instruction are the way of life. Fathers, says St. Paul, Train up your children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. These and many other passages, of a nature generally similar, I consider as directing, either mediately, or imraediately, the conduct of sinners. Most of them are so obviously of this char acter, as apparently to adrait of no dispute. A part of them may, I am aware, admit of objections to this construction. But, if these were to be given u]i, the rest would, I apprehend, be abun dantly sufficient to answer the purpose, for which they have been quoted. That they are directed to such objects, as I have termed Means of Grace, will not be questioned. With the instruction, furnished us concerning this subject by the Word of God, we are bound to unite that also, vvhich is exhibited to us by his Providence. If certain measures have been customa rily crowned with success in the pursuit of salvation ; and other measures, or the omission of these successful ones, have termi nated without that success ; then we are warranted to conclude, that the course, which has been heretofore successful, . will be again. We are warranted to concltide, that what God has usually blessed, he may confidently be expected to bless ; and that the SER. CXXXVt.] THEIR INFLUENCE. 51 conduct, which has been regularly followed by impenitence and unbelief, will produce, hereafter, no othcjr consequences. But, so far as man can judge, one general course of conduct has, in fact, been usually crowned with success in this mighty concern, from the beginning. The preaching and hearing of the Gospel, and the diligent, anxious use of those, which I have styled Means of Grace, have been actually followed by faith, repentance, and holiness, from the promulgation of the Gospel to the present time. The same things may, therefore, be reasonably expected to produce the same consequences hereafter. III. / shall now endeavour to explain the Influence of these Means upon Mankind. Before I begin this explanation, I wish to reraark, that, although I should fail of giving a satisfactory account of this subject, the fail ure would, in no degree, affect the truth of the doctrine. If the evidence alleged has been sufficient, and the conclusions have been fairly drawn ; then the doctrine is true. Nor will ray igno rance, or that of any other persons, concerning the Manner, in which the event referred to is accomplished, and the doctrine true, make any difference with respect to the principal point. We knOw, perfectly, the Existence of many facts ; while of the Man ner, in which they are accomplished, we are unable to form any adequate conception. The Influence of the Means of Grace upon riiankind may, if I mistake not, be explained under the two general heads of Instruction; and Impression. These I shall now consider, in the order already specified. 1. The Means of Grace become such hy instruction. It will be universally acknowledged, that men, according to Si. PauVs declaration, cannot believe on him, of whom. they have not heard; nor call on him, in whom they have not believed. If God, the Father, or the Son, be unknown ; it is plain, that he can neither be trusted, invoked, nor obeyed. There can be no known relation, in this case, between the creature and the Crea tor ; and, therefore, on the part of the. creature, no known, or possible, duty to the greater. Where there is no law, there is no transgression; and where there is no knowledge,' e;ither actual or possible, of a law, there is, in the fullest sense,, no law. The knowledge of God, thei-efore, his Law, and our obligation to obey. it, is indispensable even to our possible obedience, or diso bedience. When mankind had fallen, and Christ Jiad made an expiation for their sins ; it was equally, and absolutely, necessary, in order to their acceptance of Christ, which then became their duty, that they should know this Glorious Person, in such a sense, as to enable them to exercise faith in him as their Redeemer. , Without such knowledge, it is naturally impossible for us to believe in Him at 52 THE MEANS OF GRACE ; [SER. CXXXVI." all. The same things are equally true of every religious duty, and subject. We cannot perform any duty, however well disposed, unless it be known to us ; nor be required to perform it, unless such knowledge be attainable. Thus it is evident, that the Gospel is indispensable to the very existence of Christianity in the mind of man : and, as the Gospel cannot be of any possible use to man, unless known by him ; so the knowledge of the Gospel is indispensable to the existence of faith, repentance, and holiness. It is indeed perfecdy obvious, that God can, with infinite ease, reveal the fundamental truths, and all other truths, of the Gospel, to any man immediately, as he did to St. Paul. This, however, is not to be expected; as it is certainly no part of his ordinary providence. In the usual course of that providence, men are taught the Gospel by Preaching, Reading, and other modes of in struction. These, or some of these, are therefore indispensable, in the usual course of things, td the existence of Christianity in the minds of men. Hence, in one respect, the Gospel is said to be the power of God unto salvation io every one that believeth : and hence, in the sarae respect, it is said, that, zuhen the world by wis dom knew not God, it pleased God hy the foolishness of jpreaching to save them that believe. In the same manner Religious Education, Meditation, Corres pondence with religious men, and the Reading of religious Books, become, thus far. Means of Salvation to mankind.. In all these ways the Word of God is made known to mankind: and all of them have, and were designed by God to have, their peculiar ad vantages. Among the things, most necessary to be known by us in order to our salv^ition, our own hearts, or moral characters, hold a pri mary place. I know of no manner, in which he, who feels himself to be whole, can reahze, that he needs a physician. To the ex istence even of a wish for deliverance, the sense of danger, or dis tress, is absolutely necessary. If we are now conscious of being holy, or of being safe ; we, certainly, can never desire renova tion, forgiveness, or expiation ; nor seek for a dehverer to save us. While such a consciousness continues, no reason can be perceived by the man, who experiences it, why he should look for salvation from Christ, any more, than why an Angel, who has never fallen, should look for salvation from the same source. But sin, and the moral distress, and danger, occasioned by it, have their seat in the heart. If, then, the heart be unknown ; these will also be unknown : and the mind will never sefek, nor wish, for deliverance from them. Of course, it cannot, and will not, expect its salvation from the Redeemer. The Knowledge of the heart is extensively communicated by the Scriptures : so extensively, that without them, mankind will never understand their true moral character in any such manner. SER. CXXXVI.] THEIR INFLUENCE. S3 as to produce any Evangelical benefit, * But all the Scriptural communications, of this nature, will be useless to iis, unless we ap ply" them to ourselves. This application can never be made to any purpose, unless we commune with our own hearts. Self-examina tion is the direct, and in many respects the only, mode, in which we apply the Scriptural accounts of our moral nature to ourselves. Without such examination we may, indeed, admit the Scriptural accounts concerning human nature, generally ; and believe, that other men are sinners, in the manner, and degree, there exhibited. But we shall never realize, that these accounts, in their whole ex tent, are applicable also to ourselves. Particularly, we shall form no just apprehensions of our odiousness in the sight of God, of the extent of our condemnation by his law, or our exposure to final f)erdition. The necessity of such examination is therefore abso- ute. Further, when we have in fact become convinced of our sin, and our danger, we are still equally unconvinced of our disposi tion to return to God, by Evangelical repentance and faith. All mankind appear originally to believe their conversion to God to be so absolutely in their power, as that, whenever they shall make serious and earnest attempts to accomplish it, they shall accom plish it of course, and without any peculiar divine assistance. Whatever opinions they may imagine themselves to form concern ing this subject, they still believe, and, if they ever become peni tents, will find themselves to have believed, that, whenever they shall resolve upori the exercise of faith and repentance, as neces sary to their moral character, and true well-being, they shall cer tainly repent, and believe. In this way, they feel in. a great measure secure of salvation. It is a secret, which probably no professed believer in the doctrines of ~fi-ee grace ever discovers, before he has made attempts of this nature, that, with all his ap prehended orthodoxy, he still places his ultimate reliarice on him self; and realizes no necessity for any peculiar assistance from God. Among the things, which he feels to be thus absolutely in his power, Pmyer, that is. Evangelical and acceptable Prayer, is always one. Nothing in the ordinary course of things, not even his own speculative belief to the contrary, will ever persuade him, that he will find any difficulty in praying to God, until after he has seriously made the trial. His own efforts to pray -will usu ally be the first, and the only, means of changing his opinion, and of convincing him, that he has essentially mistaken his real character. Actual attempts at Prayer, at exercising faith and repentance, and at forming efficacious resolutions of obedience, furnish, in this case, a kind of instruction, not easily supplied by any thing else. Conviction of the practicability, or impracticability, of any meas ¦ ures, ofthe insufficiency of our own powers, and of the certain failure of our efforts, is wrought only by the trial of these meas- 54 THE MEANS OF GRACE ; [SER. CXXXVI, ures, powers, and efforts. A loose, general, uninfluential belief may be otherwise entertained. But a conviction, which will be felt, will be gained only in this manner. I know not whether, in all ordinary cases, this conviction is not indispensable to the at tainment of holiness. In the conduct, and character, of Religious men, the actual ex istence of religion is often, perhaps usually, first seen and believ ed. In the same manner is the dignity, the beauty, and the excellence, of religion usually first discerned, and acknowledged. The truth also, and especially the importance, of many primary doctrines of the Gospel, and the chief part of what is commonly intended by Experimental religion, are all principally learned, and realized, by means of their conversation. These may serve as specimens, sufficient for the present pur pose, of the Instruction, acquired in the use of the Means of Grace. ' 2. Means of Grace hecome such by the Impressions, which they make on the heart. To a person, at all versed in human nature, it is perfectly evi dent, that, in every case where raen are to be moved to any se rious exertion, mere conviction will often be inefficacious. The Intellect is not the motive faculty of the mind. The Will, in, which term 1 include all the affections, gives birth to every effort, which the mind makes concerning the objects of the present, or the fu ture, world. But the raere conviction of the Intellect is, of itself, rarely sufficient to move the Will, or engage the^affections. Some thing further is, in a particular manner, necessary to engage man in the serious pursuit of spiritual and eternal objects, or to make hira realize any serious interest in these objects. The mere proof, that a doctrine is true, is usually but one step towards persuading us to exertion of any kind. In addition to this, it is comirionly necessary for the same end, that our imagination be roused, and our affections awakened and engaged. In accordance with these observations, mankind, in their cus tomary language, regularly express the different states of the muid, when it is merely convinced, and when it feels the truth, of which it is convinced. To see a truth, and to feel it, are familiar expressions in our language, which denote ideas widely different from each other. So different are they, that we commonly see, without feeling at all ; and, therefore, without being moved to ex ertion by what we see. All men use, all men understand, this language ; and thus prove, that there is a solid foundation in tbe nature of things for the distinction, which it expresses. In accordance vvith this scheme. Eloquence, both in speaking and writing, has ever been directed to the Imagination ; and to the Passions, as well as to the Intellect : and that kind of elo quence, which has been employed in moving the heart, has been considered as possessing a higher, and more influential, nature than SEB. CXXXVI.] THEIR INFLUENCE. 55 that, which is addressed merely to the understanding. Hence, eloquence itself is coraraonly considered, rather as ,the power of Persuasion, than the power of Conviction. That we are capable of being moved to a sense of spiritual ob jects, altogether different from a cold, uniiripassioned conviction, as truly as to such a sense of temporal objects, cannot adrait of a rational doubt. Every minister of the Gospel, every moralist, and every other man, who labours to amend the humaln character ; even those, who deny the doctrine, for which I am contending ; prove, that they adopt this opinion by usirig, to the utmost of their power, the means of Impression for this end, as well as those of Conviction. In this conduct they show, more qvidently than is possible by any other method, that they realize this difference, and, to avail themselves of it, eraploy these raeans. The Scriptures themselves are universally formed in this man ner. They are every where filled with Instruction ; biit they are also filled every where with Persuasion. Instead of being a cold compilation of philosophical dogmas, they, are filled with real life ; with facts ; with persons ; with forcible appeals, to the imagina tion ; and with powerful applications to the heart. With these, the instruction is every where interwoven. By these, it is contin ually embodied. In the Bible, no affection of the human heart is unaddressed. Our hope and fear, our love and hatred, our sor row and joy, our desire and aversion, nay, our taste for beauty, novelty, and sublimity, for moral glory and greatness, are all alter nately, and most forcibly, applied to, in order that the whole man, as a being possessed of imagination and affections, as well as of un derstanding, may be alarmed, allured, and compelled, to return from sin, embrace holiness, and live for ever. Now, the Scriptures were published to a world of sinners ; and with the most merciful design of bringing them to repentance and salvation. To them, in a peculiar manner, is a great part of the Scriptures addressed. They are profitable in all their parts ; and are contrived by Infinite Wisdom so, as best to compass the end, for which they were written. They teach, that we may see, they impress, that we may feel, divine fruth in the most profitable manner. In the promotion of this end, all the Means of Grace conspire. By an early, and well-directed. Religious 'Education, such truths, as children can understand, are conveyed to their minds with a force, eminently impressive, and singularly lasting. The state of the mind itself is, here, peculiarly favourable to the design of making deep impressions ; and has, hence, been particularly re garded by God in those precepts, which enjoin such an education at this period. The efficacy of these impressions is strongly de clared in that remarkable passage, already quoted from the Book of Proverbs. Train up a child in the way he should go-; and, when he is old, he will not depart from ii. 56 THE MEANS OF GRACE; [SER. CXXXVI. What is true of Religious Education, is also true of all the Means of Grace, which I have specified. Public Worship is plain ly formed, with a particular design to affect the heart of man by those truths, which are taught in the house of God. The Day, the Place, the Occasion, are all in the highest degree solemn and interesting. The numbers, united in the worship, necessarily communicate, and receive, the strong feelings of sympathy; and regard the subjects of- instruction with emotions, widely different from those, which would be experienced in solitude. The nature of the Ordinances is also in a singular degree solemn, awful, and affecting. In a word, every thing, pertaining to the subject, is in the happiest manner fitted to move the mind, and deeply to en- stamp on it the truths of the Gospel. Prayer, in the like manner, is eminently fitted to teach, and not only to teach, but to make us feel, the various doctrines of Reli gion. Prayer, in every form, is a service, peculiarly impressive. In the Church, in the Family, and in the Closet, it is attended by pre-eminent advantages. When we retire to our closets, and shut the door on the world, and all it contains ; and pray to our Father, who is in secret; we are withdrawn frpm all external things ; are fixed on our own concerns ; our guilt, our danger, our helpless ness, our dependence on God alone for hope, sanctification, arid deliverance ; and our absolute necessity of being interested in Christ, as the only expiation for sin, and the only safety to man. We bring God before us,/«ce to face; and see, eye to eye. The awful and transcendent character of this Great and Glorious Be ing rises up to our view in a manner, resembhng that, in which the Israelites contemplated it at the foot, or Moses on the summit, of Mount Sinai, The nearness of the Judgment is realized with singular force, and the approach of the final Recompense, antici pated with profound awe, and most salutary apprehension. Among the things, which, in the attempts to perform this duty, are deeply impressed on the soul of the sinner, his own Inability io pray, in a manner acceptable to God, is one of the most important and affecting. No sinner realizes this truth, before he has made the attempt in earnest. Nor does any thing appear to lay low the pride, and annihilate the self-righteousness, of the human heart in the same effectual manner. When he attempts to pray, and in the /Very act of attempting it, finds clear and practical proof, that his prayers are selfish, cold, and heartless ; he first begins to feel, in a useful raanner, his absolute dependence on God for every good disposition. Prayer is naturally the last hope, the last consola tion, of man. So long as we can ask for Mercy, we never feel en tirely unsafe. But when the soul becomes satisfied, by actual trial, that its prayers are such, as itself condemns ; it becomes also satisfied, that its only ultimate dependence is on the mere Mercy of God. SER. CXXXVI.] THEIR INFLUENCE. 57 Prayer also, in the same effectual manner, opens to the view of the soul, with peculiar powerj, its whole moral state ; its guilt, its exposure, and its ruin. - All these things, when brought up to view in its converse with God, in making them the subjects of its own confessions and requests, and in revolving them with the most solemn and interesting meditation, all enhanced by a reahzing sense of the presence of God, are felt by the soul with a peculiar energy, usually followed by happy effects. Each of the other Means of Grace, vvhich I have specified, has its own, and that a very desirable, power of affecting the heart. We are so formed, as to be capable of deep impressions, in vari ous ways, and from many different sources. Each way has its pe cuhar efficacy ; and every source is copious in its influence on the mind. The great objects, coricerning which these impressions are es pecially needed, and are actually made, are the guilt and danger of sin ; the glorious mercy of God in redeeming, sanctifying, and forgiving sinners ; the absolute dependence of the soul on Him for all goodi both natural and moral ; arid his willingness to com municate both through Jesus Christ. These united, and thor oughly understood, constitute those views, and awaken thosie emotions, which, together, are commonly styled Convictions of Conscience ; or, to speak perhaps with more precision, that awak ened state of the Conscience, which usually precedes Regenera tion ; and which, in the ordinary course of God's providence, seems indispensable to its existence. Converse vvith as many re* ligious men, as you please^ concerning this subject ; and every one of them will declare, that he has passed through a state of mind, substantially of this nature ; and will inform you, that it anteceded every hope of reconciliation to God, and every exer cise, which he has believjed to be genuine religion in itself. Such, then, may be deemed one of the laws 6f the moral or spiritual kingdom: a law, which appears to be formed with supreme wis dom, and with supreme benevolence to the sinner. If he- were never to entertain such a sense of sin; if he were never to have such apprehensions of his danger; if he were never thus to feel his dependence on his Maker ; he could not, I think, form any just views of the nature, or greatness, of his deliverance; nor of the goodness of God in rescuing hira from destruction, sanctifying his soul, and blotting out his transgressions ; nor of the impor' tance, or excellence, of that holiness, with which he is, endued; nor of the nature and glory of that happiness, to which he will gain a final admission. In a word, it seems indispensable, that sueh a state of mind should precede his .regeneration, in order to enable him, throughout all his future being, to flndersfand what God has done for him,, and to feel the gratitude, actual ly felt by the minds, and joyfully expressed in the praises, of th'?' first-born. Vol. IV, C 58 THE MEANS OF GRACE ; [SER. CXXXVI, Some persons, when considering this subject, appear to feel, as if regeneration could not be absolutely attributed to the Spirit of Truth, unless it was accomplished, altogether, without the em ployment of Means. But this opinion is plainly eiToneous. The very Means themselves are furnished entirely by this Divine Agent. When furnished, all of them, united, would prove wholly insuffi cient without his Creative influence. No man, in his sober senses, ever mistrusted, that ploughing and sowing, rain and sunshine, would produce wheat. The Alraighty Power of God, after all these things have operated to the utmost, is absolutely necessary even to the germination of the seed, and still more obviously to the per fection of the plant. In the same manner, whatever means may be employed in bringing man from sin to holiness, and whatever may be their influence, the Creative power of the Divine Spfrit is absolutely necessary to accomplish his renovation. All that can be truly said, in this case, is, that this Glorious Person operates in one manner, and not in another. The human soul is not regenerated in the same manner with that, in which the dust of the ground was originally made into a human body. In this case, a mere act of Divine power, uncon nected with every thing else, accomplished the effect. But, before renewing man, God is pleased in the usual course of his Spiritual providence, to instruct him, to alarm, to invite, to promise, and to persuade. _. To prove the usefulness of these means, nothing more seems necessary, than to observe, that they always precede, or at tend, our renovation : that is, always in the usual course of provi dence. It is the soul, which is th,us taught, alarmed, and aUured, upon which descends the efficacious grace of the Holy Spirit ; and not the soul, uninstructed, unawakened, thoughdess of its guilt, and devoted only to the pursuit of sensual objects. The whole his tory of experimental religion, both vvithin and without the Scriptures, is, unless I am deceived, a coraplete confirmation of this truth. But to the existence of this state of the soul, the Means of Grace, as I have described them, and their infiuence, appear to be indis pensable. By the Instructions, which they communicate on the one hand, and the Impressions, which they make on the other, con cerning spiritual objects, they appear, whenever employed with seriousness, fervour, arid perseverance, to bring the soul into this interesting and profitable situation. It is, I conceive, with refer ence to this fact, that God says. Is not my word as the fire,Mnd as the hammer, that breaketh the rock in pieces ? With reference to this fact, Christ says, that his words are spirit and life ; arid that they will make men free from the bondage of corruption. With the same reference, Paul declares the Gospel to be the Power of God unto salvdtion; and the Word of God to be quick and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword. From this power of the Gospel was derived the fact, that the Jezus, who crucified Christ, SER. CXXXVI.] THEIR INFLUENCE. 59 were in such numbers prickedin the heart by the preaching of St, Peter, and cried out. Men and brethren, what shall we do ? All the efficacy, which I have attributed to the Means of Grace, does not, I acknowledge, amount to regeneration, nor ensure it. But it amounts to what St. Paul terms planting and watering. The increase must be, and still is, given by God only. In the same manner, God must create the grain : or the husbandman, after all his ploughing and sowing, after all the rain and the sunshine, will never find a crop. Still, these are indispensable means of his crop ; so indispensable, that without them, the crop would never exist. As truly, in the ordinary course of providence, there will, without the use of the Means of Grace, be no spiritual harvest. There will be no Insfructions given ; no Impressions made ; and no realizing convictions of guilt, danger, and dependence, pro duced : and without these, there will be no regeneration of the soni, and no title obtained tQ eternal life. SERMON CXXXVII. THE ORDINARY MEANS OF feRACE, OBJECTIONS ANSWERED. 1 Corinthians iv. 15. — For though 'i/e havc len thousand instructors in Christ, yet .have ye n,ot many fathers ; for in 'Christ Jesus have I begotten you througlithe Gospel. In the first discourse, from these words, I proposed, I. To show, that there are Means of Grace.; II. To show. What they are ; III. To explain their Infiuence ; a;nd, IV. To answer the principal Objections to this scheme of doo' trine. The three first of these subjects have been already discussed. I shall now, IV. Anszuer the principal Objections to this scheme qf doctrine. These, as they are customarily alleged, may be considered as chiefly made to two practical inferences, which I shall derive from the two preceding discourses. 1. It follows from the observations, made in these discourses, that the Means of Grace ought to be used by Sinners ; and by Christians, for the purpose of promoting the salvation of Sinriers, If there are Means of grace and salvation, given by God ; then they were given for the very purpose of promoting the salvation of sinners. As this was the end, which God proposed in commu nicating them to mankind ; it is an end, in which all men are bound to rejoice, and which they are plainly obligated to pursue. But unless these means are used by Sinners for their own salvation, they will ordinarily be of no benefit to them : and, unless Christians use them, also, for the purpose of promoting the salvation of sin ners, they will fail of their intended effect. Christian Ministers must preach the Gospel to sinners. Christian Parents must edu cate their sinful children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. Christians must hve, and act, and converse, with sinners., Other wise, the salvation of sinners vvill usually be neglected, and there fore will be unattained. Further ; if there are Means of Grace, then the appointment of them is wise ; the communication of thera to mankind, benevolent ; and the usd of them by those, for whora they were appointed, proper. It can hardly be supposed, that God has provided, and published, means of salvation to raankind, and yet by his own au thority made it improper, that they should be used. According to \his scheme, sinners, although expressly commanded io flee from SER. CXXXVII.] THE MEANS OF GRACE, >o. 61 the lurath to come, to seek the Lord while he may he found, and to tum from the error of their way, are yet by Divine authority pre cluded from the very measures, which alone will, in the usual course of things, produce the effegt enjoined. That Christians "are bound to eraploy the Means of Grace for the salvation of sinners, vvill not, I suppose, be doubted. That sinners must employ them, also, in various respects, is evinced by this very position; as well as by the observations, made in the preceding discourses. If the Gospel is to be preached to sinners ; they must hear. If Christian parents are to train up their children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord ; they must hsten to their instructions. If sinners are to become acquainted with the Word of God ; or even to know whether that which is preached to them is the word of God, or not ; they raust read the Scriptures. If sinners are to be informed of the reality, power, and excellency, of religion? they must converse with religious men. If they are to. understand, and feel, their guilt; they must commwrie with their own hearts., If they are ever to know the real ha ture of their character, and ef forts; they must pray, Frora their own use of the Means of Grace, almost all their deep impressions of their guilt, danger, dependence on Christ, and absolute need of, the regenerating in fluence of the Spirit of God, must be derived., In a word, if they are to obtain salvation, as most, or all, other Christians have ob tained it ; indeed, if they are to obtain it at all, in the ordinary course of providence; they raust obtain it in the use of the Means of Grace. This is the Way, which God has ever blessed, and will undoubtedly bless hereafter. Nor are we warranted to hope for his blessing in any other manner. To the proofs of this point, alleged in this, and the preceding discourses, I shall add but one, at the present time. God, in the Dispensation which he revealed to Moses, required all the Israel ites to use, continually, all the Means of Grace, furnished to them in the then existing Scriptural Canon. The parent, however sin ful he might be, who did not circumcise his man-child upon the eighth day, was by the express law of God punished with the ex cision of that child. Every male was expressly requirejd to pre sent himself three times a year before the Lord : that is, at the tabernacle, or in the temple. All were required to keep the ap pointed feasts ; particularly to celebrate the passover. They were required, without distinction, to offer the various appointed sacri- ; fices; to educate their children religiously; and to seet the Law at the mouth of the priests, its ordinary ministers. It is remarka ble, that for the omission- of these duties they were, in several in stances, to be punished with excision : particularly such as did not afflitt themselves on the great day of Atonement : Lev. xxiii. 29 : such, as, being ceremonially clean, forbore to keep the Passover : suchi as killed an ox, lamb, or goat, and did not bring it to the 62 THE MEANS OF GRACE. [SER. CXXXVII, door of the tabernacle, to offer an offering unto the Lord. Lev. xvii. 4. Thus the Israelites, and, in some of the cases, the stran gers who resided with them, were not only required, but required under this terrible sanction, punctiliously to, use the Means of Grace, both ordinary and extraordinary. It is further to be observed, that the Israelites are no where, either in the Old or New Testament, censured for" the fact, that they at tended on these various Means of Grace, They are often censured for their impenitence, and unbelief, indeed ; and the more severe ly for being impenitent and unbelieving in the midst of these so lemn services, because the' abuse of such privileges obviously enhanced their guilt. But not a hint is given us, either by Christ, the Prophets, or the Apostles, that they were censurable, merely for being present, when these means were employed by others, or for being active in employing them, themselves, for their own good. The Gospel, therefore, regards this subject exactly as it was re garded by the Law ; ahd has introduced no change, in this respect, into the Divine dispensations. 2. It follows from the same discourses, that Ministers ought to ad vise, and exhort, sinners to use the Means of Grace. If God has appointed these means, and is daily blessing them ; if he has Tisually, and not improbably always, wherever the Gospel has been published, conveyed his spiritual blessings to men in this vvay ; then it cannot be reasonably doubted, that Ministers ought to advase sinners to labour, in this way, to gain eternal life. As to sinners in general, this is the only way, in which eternal life will be gained. Refusing them this advice, there fore, is no other, than refusing them any advice concerning their salvation. To this scheme it is however objected, 1. That regeneration, being immediately, and solely, the work of the Spirit of God, is not at' all accomplished hy means ; and that, therefore, sinners, however strenuously they may use the Means of Grace, do, in, truth, nothing towards this change of character. That the act of regenerating man is an act of the Divine Spirit alone, I readily admit, and fully believe ; but I depy the consequence, drawn from this doctrine. If I am hot deceived, I have, in both the preceding discourses, particularly in the first, proved it to be an error. The Text itself, if 1 mistake not, is a decisive proof, that it is an error. The Text asserts, to s4y the least, that St. Paul, by his preaching, contributed to the re generation of ^^er Corinthian. Christians. In a humbler sense he begat these Christians, as truly, as God did, in a higher sense. But if Paul contributed to the regeneration of these men by his preach ing ; the men themselves as certainly contributed to their own re generation by being present at his discourses, by hearing them, by understanding them, and by feeling with strong impressions the truths which he uttered. Had not all this been done by them; SER. CXXXVII.] OBJECTIONS ANSWERED. 63 St. Paul might, with exactly the same success, have preached to the dead. In the docfrine, for which I contend, there is, I apprehend, nothing embarrassing, and nothing which is even peculiar. God, as was observed in the ffrst of these discourses, is equally the sole Agent in the production of a crop. But it would be a palpable absurdity, to conclude from this fact, that the crop would come into existence without the labours of the farmer. Were he not to plough, and sow, the ground ; a child knows, that, not a stalk of wheat would be produced. St. Paul contributed as really to the spiritualharwesi, as the farmer to the natural one ; and in the same sense : for, without his labours, that harvest would not have ex isted. Neither Paul, nor the husbandman, is at all concerned in the creative act of God, employed in each of these cases. But both of them do that, without vvhich this creative act would not exist. Accordingly, where the Gospel is not preached, regeneration does not take place ; as crops have no existence, where the earth is not cultivated. 2. It is objected, that the use of the Means of Gracc, on the part of sinners, is itself sinful ; and that Ministers therefore, cannot con scientiously advise sinners to use the means ; since this would be no other, than advising them to commit sin. As this, in all probabihty, is the Objection, on which the greatest stress is laid, and that which has contributed most to perplex those to whom, and, not improbably, those also, by whom, it is urged ; I shall consider myself as justified in exa mining it at some length. It is presented in various lights. I will endeavour to follow the course, pursued by the objectors themselves. It is triumphantly alleged, that the Scriptures have decided the point in debate ; and established the objection, imraoveably, by such declarations as the following. The sacrifice of the wicked is an abomination to the Lord. Prov. xv. 8. The sacrifice of the wick ed is abomination : how much mori, when he bringeth it with A wick ed mind.* Prov. xxi. 27. He thai turneth away his ear frorn hear ing the Law, even his prayer shall be an abomination. Prov. xiviii. 9. If, then, the sacrifice of the wicked is an abomination, if the prayer of the wicked is an abomination; it cannof be lawful for the wicked to pray, nor for a Minister to advise hira to pray. I have, I believe, alleged the objection in its full force, and in the very terms, in which it is usually alleged. This, at least, has been my design. •, It is not pretended, that sinners are in the Scriptures expressly forbidden to pray; nor that Ministers are expressly forbidden to advise them to pray. The ol^ection is inferred from other de clarations of the Scriptures. Like other inferences, it is, how- * Especially when he offereth it to serve some base end. Hodgson 64 THE MEANS OF GRACE. [SER. CXXXVII. ever, to Ise suspected, until it shall be shown to be certainly, and necessarily, derived from such declarations. The authority of a certain conclusion, fairly derived from the Scriptures, 1 adrait. But in order to this admission, 1 must be satisfied, that it is certain, and fairly derived from the Scriptures. Let us now examine this in ference. 1. The Objection is founded on this general doctrine ; ihat, when ever an individual will commit sin in any conduct, he cannot lawfully adopt, nor be lawfully ad'pised to adopt, that conduct. But from this doctrine it will follow, that sinners cannot lawfully do any thing, while in a state of sin, nor be lawfully advised to do any thing. There is as much, certainty, that a sinner will sin in all other condu.ct, which he adopts while he is a sinner, as in pray ing. The ploughing of the wicked i* expressly declared to be sin, Prov. xxi. 4. The way ofthe wicked, that is, his universal course of life, is declared to be an abomination to the Lord, Prov. xv. 9. The thoughts of ihe wicked are declared to be an abomination to the Lord, Prov, xv, 26. Of course, the wicked cannot lawfully plough, think, nor live in the ordinary course of life, that is, con verse, labour, buy, sell, and provide for their famihes ; nor be la-ivfully advised to do these, or any of these, things. It will be remembered that all these declarations, and all those quoted in a preceding paragraph, were written by an Israelite un der the Mosaic dispensation ; and written for men, living, also, under the same dispensation. Yet, in that very dispensation, God required Moses to command all sinners, of that nation, to labour ; to cultivate their own ground ; to circumcise their children ; to celebrate the passover ; to offer sacrifices ; to be present at the public worship of God ; to hear and learn his word from the mouth of their priests ; and to teach all these things to their chil- ^en. It will not, I presume, be questioned, that Moses in enjoin ing these things upon the sinful Israelites, as well as upon the vir tuous ones, acted lawfully ; or, in other words, was guilty of no sin. But what was lawrful for Moses, in this case, is in itself law ful. Accordingly, it was lawfully done by all the Ministers, who followed hira in the Jewish Church. It cannot therefore fail to be lawful to Christian Ministers, unless it has been plainly forbidden. It will here be, said that Moses, in requiring this conduct of the sinful Israelites, neither comraanded nor authorized them to con tinue sinners in performing it. This is unquestionably true. Sb far from allowing them to continue in sin, he required them to per form these various duties from supreme love to God. , Equally true is this of the Christian Minister, in directing sinners, to use the Means of grace, or to perform any of the other duties of life. Instead of directing or allowing them to reraain impenitent, he di rects them to perform every duty with a virtuous disposition. From this doctrine it will also follow, that it is unlawful to ad-ifise Christians themselves to use the Means of grace, or indeed to SEB. CXXXVII] OBJECTIONS ANSWERED. ~ 65 adopt any course of conduct whatever. Both the Scriptures and oijservation teach us, that Christians continually sin ; that they sin iu their repentance, in their faith, in reading the Bible, in prayer, in the observance of the Sabbath, in their attendance on public worship, in the education of their children, and in the ordinary business of life. Whatever conduct they adopt, we know that they will sin in performing it. On this principle, therefore, they cannot lawfully adopt, nor be lawfully advised to adopt, that con duct. Of course, as our Lord, when he directed the Apostles to go and preach the Gospel to every creature, knew that they would commit sin in obeying it ; the direction itself, according to the scheme which I oppose, was unlawful. It will here probably be asked, Wliat then shaU he done ? Shall we adoise men to commit sin ? To this question I answer, that, ac cording to the spirit of the objection, you must either advise them to nothing, not even to repent and believe ; or you must advise them to commit sin : for accoi-ding to the objection, advising them to any thing, even to repent and believe, is advisipg them to com mit sin. But I apprehend that this account of the subject is as unfound ed, as the scheme enforced by it is impracticable. God, as it ap pears to me, deals with mankind, and, if he deals with them at all according to the System of Providence which he has established, must, deal with them, as rational beings. ¦ As they are all originally sinners ; every thing addressed to thera, either by^ God or man, must bc addressed to sinners. He has commanded and exhorted, sinners in his own person ; and has required men also to teach, and exhort, them in his name. In these commsinds and exhortations, two thii\gs are included : the Ad to be done, and the Disposition zuith whichit is to be rfon€. The command or counsel sometimes includes boUi expressly; and sometimes but one. Such com mands and counsels, as direct to the performance of the act, direct to that act, zuhich, in the case stated, is proper io be done ; and imply the disposition zoith which it should be done. Such, as direct thc disposition, require that, and that only, which is- virtuous. Those, which require the act, regulate both the heart, arid the external conduct. Those, which require the disposition, regulate merely the affections of the heart. Commands of both these kinds, God has evidently given to men as rational beings merely ; and often without discriminating at all their moral chai-acter. They are given to all men. The duties vvhich these commands enjoin are numberless. They occur every day, and are as obhgatory on the sinner as on the Christian. They bind with their whole force every man by vvhom they are known. Among these, are prayer, attending public worship, reading the Scriptures, and industry in our lawful business, God requires every man to perform these various duties of life as they, occur. He does not leave him at liberty to defer thc performance, until he Vot, IV, 9 6S MEANS OF GRACE. [SER. CXXXVII. has discovered whether he is the subject of Evangehcal repent ance. He requires the performance at the, time ; and, if the in dividual refuse, God will not hold him guihless. But, it will be asked. Is not every action to be performed from supreme love to God? An answer to this question has already been given. This disposi tion is implied in every action which God requires us to perform ; and God will accept of no performance which does not flow from this source. To such a performance only, is an impenitent sinner directed, when he is directed to pray, to read the Scriptures, to worship God in the sanctuary, or to use any of the Means of grace. It will be further asked. Whether the rtian, who performs the act merely, can he said to obey the command of God ? What is here act ually done is easily understood; so easily as to' admit of neither debate nor doubt. The person in question performs the act which God requires. But if he does not perforrn it cordially, he is not obedient in the cordial or virtupus sense. I shall perhaps be asked still further. Whether the man, who per forms the act merely, is any better for performing it, than if he had neglected or refused to perform it ? 1 answer, that, supposing the man's disposition substantially the same in both cases, he is less sinful when he performs the act, than when he neglects or refuses to perform it. This I say with' confidence, because God has said it repeatedly, and in the most unambiguous manner. Of several kings of Judah, who were plainly sinners, particularly of Joash and Amaziah, it is directly said, that they did that which was right in tlie sight of the Lord, Of Joash it is said, that he did that which was right in ihe sighfof the Lord all the days of Jehoiada ihe Priest. Of Amaziah it is said, that'he did that which was right in the sight ofthe Lord, but not with a perfect heart : that is, not with a good or virtiious heart. In other words, these princes performed those external actions, vvhich God had required. The same thing, in substance, is declared concerning several other Kings of Judah. But who can doubt, that to do thai, zuhich is right in the sight of the Lord, whatever it may be which is thus right, is less sinful, than to do that, which is wrong in the sight of the Lord ? Who can doubt, that these declarations are intentionally coramendatory ; and that they exhibit these princes as thtis far less sinful, than those, of whom it is said, that they did evil in the sight of the Lord ? The same, sentence of God concerning the sarae subject is given us, in another form, in the cases of Ahab and Jehu. Of Ahab it is said, that, when he heard the words of Elijah, announcing to him the destruction of his family, herent his clothes, and put saqkclolh upon his flesh, and fasted, and layJn sackcloth and went softly. It is immediately subjoined. And the word of ihe Lord came to Eli jah the Tishbite, saying, Seest thou how Ahab humbleth himself be fore me? Because he humbleth himself before me, Iwill not bring ihe evil in his days. In his son''s days I zuill bring the evil upon his SER. CXXXVII.] OBJECTIONS ANSWERED. 67 house. Jehu was commissioned to destroyi the family of Ahab. This commission he punctually executed. When he had finished this work, God said to him. Because thou hasi done toell in execut ing that, which was rightin mine eyes, and hasl done unto the house of Ahab according lo all that was in my heart ;- thy children, ofthe fourth generation, shaU sit on the throne of Israel. Immediately it is- subjoined, Bui Jehu look no heed to walk in ihe Lazti of ihe Lord God of Israel with all his heart ; for he departed not from the sins of Jeroboam, zuho made Israel to sin. Here we see both these princes rewarded, and expressly declared by God himself to be rewarded, for external actions merely. For both, in a man ner equally express, are pronounced, still, to be gross sinners. But that, vvhich is declared by God to be rewarded by himself, is not so sinful conduct, as that, which is either not thus rewarded, or is punished. Of Jehu, God says further. Thou hast done well in executing that which is right in mine eyes. He, vvho has done vvell in executingt'that, which is right in the eyes of his Maker, has not done so ill, as he, who has perpetrated that, which is wrong in his eyes. What is thus taught in the Scriptm-es, may be advantageously illustrated by the common experience of ourselves. The person, who does those actions, which God requires, dishonours his Maker by his life far less, and contributes to the well-being of mankind fai" more, than he, who does them not, or who does the contrary actions. To the eye of mankind the actions themselves are, often, exactly the sarae ; and have exactly the sarae influence, when performed by an unrenewed, as when performed by a re newed, man. The actions of an unrenewed man, therefore, may have a very beneficent influence on the interests of mankind, when performed agreeably to thoSe Coramands of God, vvhich re gulate the external conduct of men. According to the scheme here exhibited, the Israelites, as has been observed, were required to be present at the various religious services, enjoined by the Mosaic Law. Yet God perfectly knew, and all the succeeding Prophets and Teachers also knew, thaf,the_greater part, by far, of those, to whom these requisitions were addressed, were sinners. Still, they not only required them to repent and believe, but ad vised, exhorted, and commanded, theni, also, to do a]l these things. Nor would it have been any vindication to them for omitting the action, that their disposition was not sanctified ; nor of the Pro phet, or the Priest, for not exhorting them to the action, that they could not conscientiously advise sinners to any thing, beside Faith and Repentance. ' ^ The same scheme is pursued tliroughout the New Testament. Christ, adopting the very language of the Law, directed the ten lepers to go, and show themselves^ to the PriestSj in order to their cleansing-. Luke xvii. 12. Nine of these lepers appear to have been sinners. This Christ knew as well, before, as after. 68 THEMEANS OF GRACE. [SER. CXXXVII. Yet he did not think this a difficulty in his way towards giving them this direction. He directed a collection of Jews, of whom he testifies, that they did not believe, to search the Striptures for the purpose of dis covering his true character ; and this, plainly, in order to their faith. John v. 39, 44. He directed the young Ruler, who plainly was not a believer, to go, and sell all that he had, dnd give to the poor, and come, and fol low him. He directed the Herodians to render to Ccesar the things that are Ctssar^s. They were sinners. But paying fribute was neither re penting nor believing. He directed the Scribe, in the parable of the good Samaritan, ti> go and shew kindness to his enemies. Yet this scribe appears to have been an unbelieyer. He directed Paul, also, afterhe had fallen to the earth, and en quired what he would have him tp do, to ame, and go into Damas cus, where it should be told him what he would, have him to do. Peter, also, directed Simon Magus to repent, and pray that the thoughts of his heart might be forgivexi. It has been thought, that Peter directed him to repent first, and then to pray for forgive ness. This certainly is an unnatural construction of the pas sage. The obvious meaning is, that S^ Pe^er directed both of these things to be done immediately ; aftd without indicating any intention that Simon should wait until after he repented, before he began to pray. Many more examples of a similar nature might be added. It will not be supposed-, that in any one of these directions, the objects of them were coramanded or advised to commit sin. As rational beings they were directed to do such things, as, in the character of actions, were proper to be done in their circumstan ces : while a general indication of their duty as to the disposition with which they were to' be done, is unquestionably implied in all these passages. These passages, however, show that, in his preaching and ad vice, a minister is not to c;onfine himself to the mere enjoining of Faith and Repentance ; but is to extend them to any other con duct in itself proper to be pursued ; while he universally teaches these great Christian duties, as , the immediate end' of all his preaching. Antecedently to every effort, which the sinner makes, he is wholly ignorant whether God will not enable hirii to obey with the heart. It is also his indispensable duty thus to obey. When ever advice or exhortation is given to sinners, by any minister, he is equally ignorant whether they vvill, , or will not, obey with the heart, as well as with the outward conduct. He knows, also, that it is their duty to obey in this manner. The effort therefore ought to be made ; and the advice given. SER. CXXXVU.] OBJECTIONS ANSWERED. 69 In this manner I understand all those general commands, and exhortations, which respect the affairs of sinners. ,Our Saviour, preaching, obviously, to a collection of sinners, says, Luke xiii. 24, Strive to enter in at ihe strait gate : and again,, Matth. vii. 14, Enter ye in at the strait gate : because strait is the gate, and nar row is the way, that leadeth unto life; and few there he that find it. The gate is at the head of tiie^ way, leading to the house, into which those, who enter at the gate, are finally to be admitted. Christ never speaks of Heaven as a city, but several times as a house. Those vvho have not entered are obviously sinners : and to sinners he was obviously preaching in this kindred passage of St. Luke. Ofthe same nature is the memorable passage in Isaiah Iv. 6, 7, Seek ye the Lord while he may be found : call ye upon him while he is near. The persons, here addressed, are in the second verse, mentioned as those, who spend money for that which is not bread, and their labour for that which satisfieth not. Such persons are obviously sinners. Still they are directed to seek, and call upon the Lord. If, then, it is still objected, that directing sinners to such acts is directing them to commit sin : the answer is short. God gave these very directions to the Israelites hy Moses. Christ also gave the same directions to the Jews. It will not be supposed that he di rected them to corarait sin.' It may be further said, that sinners will commii sin in .their prayers. If they continue^ sinners they undoubtedly will. So will Christians. If this be a reason, why sinners should not be advis ed to pray ; it is also a reason, why Christians should not he ad vised to pray. But it will be replied, that the sacrifice ofthe wicked is an abom ination to the Lord ; while theprayer of the upright is his delight. That the prayer of the wickejd is in some respects an abomina tion ; of hypocrites universally ; .of other sinners generally ; is not to be questioned. There is plainly .nothing holy ip the conduct of injpenitent men. But it will not follow, that the prayer of ev ery impenitent man is in such a sense abominable to God, as to ensure rejection from him. Christ did not tefl the young Ruler that his inquiry concerning eternal life was abominable ; nor re fuse to hear, and answer him. On the contrary, the Scriptures inform us that Jesus, beholding him, loved him. . This love was plainly distinct from the general benevolence of Christ to sinners : for with this benevolence he loves all sinners. The young Ruler he loV-ed peculiarly ; and in a manner, in which he did not love the Pharisees, and the Jews generally. Otherwise, the fact would not have been specified. He did not, I acknowledge, love him with complacency: for he was not, a Christian. But he loved him, peculiarly, with what is called natural affection. In the character of this youth ^here was a peculiar natural amiableness ; such as all men see, love, and acknowledge ; and acltnovvledge, 70 THE MEANS OF GRACE. [SER. CXXXVlf, often, against their own doctrines. The foundation of this love is a train of attributes, belonging to Man, not as a sinner, nor as a saint, but as an Intelligent being. Of this number are native sweetness of temper ;, frankness ,• sincerity; simplicity, strongly seen in little children ; gentleness ; Isindness ; generosity ; and compassion. All. these are in themselves amiable in a certain de gree ; and in this degree they were loved by Christ. Hence I argue, that, as all Christ's affections were exactly ac cordant with truth and propriety, so this exercise of affection to the young man was of the Sarae nature, and was perfectly approv ed by God. Of course, there is at times something in sinners, which, in itself, is not abominable to God ; although their moral or sinful character is altogether abominable. It is not wrong in itself, that sinners should desire food, or rai ment, or happiness, or safety from evil. It is^ impossible that percipient beings should exist, without desiring the two last of these objects : and equally impossible that men should not desire the two first. The best men, and thie worst, desire them alike : and no man is for this conduct ever reproved in the Scriptures.- To ask of God for happiness, and final safety, is not necessarily insincere, nor guilty, eVen in sinners. When sinners ask for mere mercy, or mere happiness, or mere safety, they may desire either as truly, as saints ; although their desires are not virtuous. So far as their desires are merely natural, inseparable from their nature, and sin cere, they are not morally wrong : nor are they exhibited in the Scriptures as objects of the Divine ariger. Accordingly, the prayer of the Publican, who was,' I think, plainly a sinnc'r, was not regarded with mere anger , by God ; and was exactly such a prayer, as I hav« mentioned : a prayer, for mere mercy and safety. He went down io his house justified rather than the Pharisee, because he had, in some iraportant respects, a. just sense of his character, and a sincere desire to be delivered from the dangers ofit: while the Pharisee had neither. It is in the nature of things proper, that God, who saves no man for his merit, but communicates salvation merely from compas sion, should save those, who a;re sensible of their guilt, danger, and distress, rather than those, who are utterly insensible, stupid, and careless. The former, in the natural sense, are qualified, and' the latter are unquahfied, to understand his Mercy, the greatness of the Love of Christ, and the wonderful work of Saric- tificatio'n;' and to feel the evils, from which they are delivered, and the blessings, to which they are introduced, beyond the grave. Accordingly, Sanctification, as I have heretofore particularly ob- servisd, is communicated by God to sinners^ only wheh they are convinced of their guilt and danger, and laboriously employed in asking for forgiveness ; and not to those, who neither feel, nor strive, nor pray. If the prayers of convinced sinners were abom- ¦ inable, in the sense ofthe objector; could this fact exist? Is SER. OXXXVII.] OBJECTIONS ANSWERED. '71 not the steady course of Providence a complete refutation of the scheme ? Finally. It will be asked. Do not sinners grow worse under con victions of Conscience; and in the use of Means ? To this question I answer, that I do not know. Neither do my objectors. I do not beheve the Publican was justified rather than the Pharisee, because he grew worse under his conviction. Indi viduals may grow worse ; and in one respect all certainly do. For they continue to sin so long as they are sinners ; and that, whether they are convinced, or unconvinced. Whether their characters, and conduct, are more guilty in any given instance, and during the periods immediately preceding, I am ignorant ; and shall remain so, until I can search the heart, and measure the degrees of depravity. As this is beyond the power of man ; the whole inquiry is idle and vain. Whenever sinners commit the same siris against greater light, they are more guilty than vvhen they are committed against less light. But no man can determine whether this, or any thing like this, is the case with a sinner under conviction in a given instance ; unless, perhaps, sometimes, the convinced person himself. I see no good reason, why this question should ever be introduced into Theological discourses. The only tendency of such introduction is to perplex, and distress. I have now, unless I am deceived; considered this Objection, in all its parts ; and in all the forms, in which it is customarilyalleged. I shall now examine how far the Objectors are consistent with themselves in their other conduct towards sinners. , Many of these Objectors have children; and educate them religiously, as well as prudentiy. These children^ in many in stances, they know to be sinners, so far as this character can be known in any case. Now all these parents advise, and exhort, and command, their children to obey them ; that is, in their ex ternal conduct ; to attend their family prayers ; to be present at public worship ; to learn, and repeat prayers to God ; and to be earnestiy and solemnly attentive to these religious duties. They teach them, in the same manner, to speak truth, ' to do justice, and to show kindness, to all, with whom fhey are concerned. They require them, also, to labour,; to preserve their property ; to go regularly to school ; to perform errands ; and to do many other services. In a word, by the whole weight of their own au thority, and that of the Scriptures, they require them to do every useful and desirable act, and to imbibe every useful and desirable habit. Now it is to be remembered, that these children are sinners; and are known to be sinners. Of course, whatever condi^ct they adopt, they will commit sin. Of course, also, whatever conduct they are advised to adopt, they will, according to the general principle, on which the objection is founded, be advised to com- 72 THE MEANS OF GRACE. [SER, CXXXVH. mit sin. They will as probably, or as certainly, commit sin in executing the commands of their parents, attendmg public or fam ily worship, going to school, or performing an errand, as other sinners do in praying, or performing any other act, not in itself sinful. >i., How, then, can these parents, particularly such of them as are ¦skilled in this controversy, advise their sinful children to ^pursue these kinds of conduct?. Nay, more ; how can they exhort, and command them ;; reward them for obeying ; and punish them for disobeying ? The bare advice, or exhortation, given to other sin ners, and prompting thera to pray, and strive, that they may be saved, is, in the vievv of these parents, unlawful; and they refuse to give it. But to their own sinful children they not only give ad vice, of the same unlawful nature ; but add to their exhortations arid commands iheir rewards and punishments. Suppose the child of such a parent should refuse to obey such a comraand, or any other, because he was, and because his pa rent knew he was, a sinner, and could not, therefore, lawfully do the thing commanded, nor his parent lawfully command him to do it : what could the parent answer, consistently I mean, with his own principles? Plainly, he could not reprove the child for bis .refusal ; nor afterwards advise, exhort, nor command, him to do any thing, until after the child should have hopefully become a Christian. .' ¦ But,.in this case, what would become of children ; and, ultiniate- ly, of the world ? If children were not advised, what useful thing could they know ? If they vvere not exhorted and commanded, what useful thing would they do; what useful habit would they establish, or even imbibe ? Without such habits, what valuable end of their being could they answer? They would evidently become mere beasts of prey ; and make the world a den of violence and slaughter. In the same raanner, and on the sarae principles, no person, entrusted with the governraent, or instruction of mankind, can advise, exhort, or command them, while sinners, to do any thing, except to repent and beheve. Civil Rulers, and Instructors, are daily, called upon by their offices to. advise, or otherwise direct, such as are plainly sinners. Every law and regulation of a State, or Seminary of Science, is possessed pf this nature ; and is a greater transgression on the part of the Lavvgiver, or Ruler, than advice can be; because jt contains a stronger expression of his will^and a more powerful inducement to the conduct, which is prescribed. When parents, therefore, or others, advise ; they are, according to the Objection, guilty. When they exhort, or com mand, they are more guilty. When they reward, or punish, they are most guilty, j. As Civil Rulers and Instructors are obliged, equally with Minis ters, to do what is right, and avoid what is wrong ; they can no more SER. CXXXVn.] OBJECTIONS ANSWERED 73 be ^stified than Ministers, in advising, exhorting, or commanding, sinners to do any thing, which is unlawful. Hence, unless their subjects, or pupils, should first repent and believe, they cannot require them to do any thing antecedently to their Repentance. The world, of course, must be uninstructed, and ungoverned, until the Millennium: and, what is still more to be lamented, the Mil lennium itself, according to the usual course of God's Providence^ will never arrive. Among the regulations, which exist in all Literary Institutions, one, ever esteemed of high iraportance, is the establishraent of Public Prayers. At these, students, universally, have hitherto been required to be present. But on the scheme which I oppose, this requisition is altogether unlawful. In every such Institution, there is conclusive reason to believe, that the great body of the members are impenitent. None of these, therefore, can, according to this scheme, be lawfully requfred to attend this worship, nor the public worship of the Sabbath. But what would become of a literary Institution, if this attendance were not required ? What would these very parents say, if it were to be dispensed with in the case of their own children ? A Christian is the Master of a Family; but, as is sometimes the fact, is obviously the only Christian in the family. According to this scheme, it is plain, he cannot set up family worship ; because he can neither require, nor advise, the members of his household to be present at this rehgious service. Ministers, usually at least, preach more or less to sinners ; and customarily endeavour to suit their sermons to the circumstances of impenitent men. But they can never lawfully advise sinners to be present, that they may hear them preach. Nor can a Parent be justified- in dfrecting his children to be present ; or to stand up to worship ; or to listen, that he may learn, and perform his duty : for, in all these things they are still sinners, and will commit sin. Nor can a Minister advise his sinful parishioners to support him ; or to build, or repafr, a Church; or to do the external acts of char ity, justice, or truth; or to arm in defence of his country; 'or to obey its laws, and magistrates. In all these things,, when done antecedendy to regeneration, they are as really sinful, as in pray ing, and in striving, for salvation. The very persons, who rely raost upon this Objection, rejoice universally, when mankind are, in any place, awakened to solemn consideration concerning their guilt and danger. But every awak ened sinner prays : and no person can by any Ordinary means prevent him from praying. Why do these men rejoice ? Certainly not in the sin, which the persons awakened are supposed, to com mit. Certainly not in the aborainable character, which these prayers havejn the sight of God. In what, then, do they rejoice? Undoubtedly, in the prospect of the sinner's sanctification, and Vol, W. ^10 74 THE MEANS OF GRACE. [SER. CXXXVU. return t© God. Of course, there is such a prospect. In tbis an gels would also rejoice. 3. It is objected, that advising Sinners to pray will encourage them io sloth, and quiet them in sin. That this consequence may follow, I shall not deny. But it will follow, only from an abuse of the doctrine, which is here taught. A bad man may pervert a good doctrine to bad purposes : but this is no objection against the doctrine itself. These very conse quences have, I verily believe, flowed from the doctrine of my objectors in ten instances, where in one they have, flowed from that ^hich I am supporting. It is the duty of all men imraediately to repent of their sins, and turn to God, with faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. These things I would always preach ; and wish my hearers always to believe, and feel. For this end I would exhort them to be present, that they might hear, and feel, them. For the same end 1 would ex hort parents, to teach them to their children in the morning of life, that they may know and feel them from the beginning. Nor am I less desirous, that they should read the Scriptures, that they may find, and feel, the same things in them, as uttered by the mouth of God ; that my own errors may in their minds be corrected, and the truths, which I preach, enforced by that holy book. For the same reasons I wish them to mark the lives, andenjOy the conver sation, of Christians ; that they may be enlightened by their views, and deeply affected by the excellency of Rehgion, manifested in their conduct. The religious writings of others I recommend, for the same important purposes. I preach, and write, with the hope of doing some real good to mankind. That others, with the same design, possess more ability to accomplish this interesting purpose, I cannot entertain a doubt. The same reasons, therefore, which make me wish, that the Congregation, allotted to me, may be pres ent, to hear ray discourses, must, with enhanced force, render me desirous, that they should also read the writings of others. Finally ; Whatever is thus taught, enforced, and gained, I urge them to make by solemn meditation a part of their own habitual course of thought ; compare with their own moral condition ; and bring home to their hearts, by asking God to sanctify them, and to bless the Means of knowledge and amendment, which He has been pleased to put into their hands. In all this I see no natural cause of sloth, or quiet in sin. On the contrary, there is here, if I raistake not, more done to awaken, engage, and encourage men to seek salvation, than on the scheme of the Objector. When I remember, that Divines of the first re putation, and the greatest success, have thus preached ; and that in the use of these very Means, the great body of mankind, who appear to have been, or to be now. Christians, have become Chris tians ; I feel assured, that this is the proper manner of persuad ing others to assume the same character, and placing them in the way to a blessing from God. SERMON CXXXVIII. THE ORDINARY MEANS OF GRACE. HEARING THE WORD OF OOO. LcKE Viii. 18. — Take heed, therefore, how ye hear. In the last discourse, but one, I distributed the principal Means of Grace under the following, Heads : I. TTie Preaching of the Gospel ; II. TTie Reading of the Scriptures ; III. Prayer; IV. Correspondence with religious men ; V. Religious Meditation ; particularly Self -Examination ; and, VI. The Religious Education of Children. In that discourse, also, 1 endeavoured to exhibit the Influence of these Means in the Work of Salvation. The next object, which I propose, is a Separate Consideration of these several subjects ; that their respective efficacy may be more particularly displayed. It will be remembered, that they are all, here, to be considered as Means, in the application of which, holi ness is originally communicated, as well as Means of improving in holiness. The direction in the Text is, I apprehend, a direction given to all men, who are in possession of the Gospel. It is delivered in the most general terms ; and may, therefore, be regarded as ex tending to every mode of hearing, which is useful. There are modes of hearing, which, unless I am deceived, are eventually use ful to sinners ; and in which the Gospel become^ to sinners the pozoer of God unto salvation^ I shall consider these modes, as included in it ; modes in which I should wish a sinful child of my own, and for the same reason should wish others also, to hear the Gpspel. Suph, as have heard in these modes, have in great mul titudes, as I verily believe, been profited, in a degree which no man can estimate. The persons, who in this sense would take heed how they hear the Gospel ; by which I intend the Scriptures at large ; ought, while they hear, to remember the following things. 1 . That the Gospel is the Word of God. To prevent any misapprehension, I wish it to be kept steadily in view, that no attention, or reverence, is here claimed, to breach ing, any farther than the Gospel is preached. To the mere opin ions, and declarations, of a Preacher, as such, no other respect is due, than that, which by common consent is rendered to the opinions and declarations of all men, of similar understanding and 76 ; THE MEANS OF GRACE. [SER. CXXXVIII.' worth. The hest opinions of men are merely useful, wholesome ad vice. The Scriptures are a Law ; possessed of Divine authority, and obligation. So far as the doctrines, precepts, and ordinances, of the Scriptures are preached, they claim the reverence, which they themselves have challenged. The soleran reraerabrance, that the Scriptures are the Word of God, involves a variety of interesting considerations. In ihis character, particularly , they come home to us as the Word of Him, by whom we were created, and by whom we are preserved, and governed. From this Great and Glorious Being, all that we have, and all that vVe hope for, is, and must be, derived. We are his property ; and are rightfully disposed of, and rightfully requir ed to dispose of ourselves, according to his pleasure. In the Scriptures alone is this pleasure made known to us. In them alone, therefore, we learn the proper destination of our faculties, our services, and ourselves. The Law, by which we are here re quired to do his pleasure, is invested with all possible authority, and obligation ; and demands our reverence, and obedience, in a manner supremely impressive. As the Word of God, also, the Scriptures are dictated hy his Wis dom, Goodness, and Truth. They are the Word of Him, who can- riot mistake, deceive, nor injure. Consequently they contain all things, necessary for life and godliness ; whatever we need to know, and whatever we ought to do, for the attainment of his ap probation. On their entire wisdom and integrity, their fitness to promote the great purpose for which they were written, and their conduciveness to it in ourselves, we are wholly to rely. Not a doubt can be reasonably entertained concerning the truth of the doc trines, the soundness of the precepts, or the sincerity of the prom ises. Nor are we any more to distrust the certainty of the threat enings, or the reality of those awful dangers, which they disclose. We are bound on the one hand not to question the fruth, and on the other, not to-dispute the wisdom and goodness, of that, which is revealed. All things, which this sacred Book contains, are to be received as they are. Our own opinions are implicitly to bow be fore them : and we are ever to be ready to believe, that what we think the foolishness of God i^ wiser than men ; than all the substitut ed opinions of ourselves or others. Let God he true, ought to be our invariable language, but every man who opposes his declara tions, a liar. Against this great and awful Being we have rebelled. Hence, although he is our Creator, Preserver, and Benefactor, he still re gards our moral character with abhorrence. The Scriptures, there fore, are published to us as the Word of an offended God. Hence are derived all those denunciations of anger and punishment, found in thera ; which could have no place in the Will of God, as re vealed to obedient creatures. SER. CXXXVIII.] HEARING THE WORD OF GOD. 77 As the Word of God, the Scriptures announce to us, that, notwith standing our rebellion, he is willing io be reconciled to us. We are, therefore, ever to remember, that they are ihe Word of the Father, and ofthe Redeemer, and of the Sanctifier, of mankind. In these venerable and amiable characters, God appears to us with infinite tenderness and endearment. His Word is thus presented to us as the pleasure of the best of all friends, and the most affectionate of all parents. In our ruined condition he beheld us with bound less mercy ; and, unasked and undesired, undertook to rescue us from desfruction. For this end, the Saviour came into the world, lived a life of humiliation, and died a death of anguish and infamy. For this end, the Spirit of Truth came into the world, to convince, renew, and purify, the hearts of mankind. Of these Three Persons in the One Jehovah, the Scriptures are the Word; willed by the Father, dictated by the Son, and inspired by the Holy Ghost. A^ the Word of God, the Scriptures are the Word of Him, on whom we daily depend for life, and breath, and all things. Whatever we enjoy he gives : whatever we hope for must, if enjoyed at all, be also given by him. Without him, we are poor, and miserable, and in want of all things. With his favour, we shall be rich indeed, and have need of nothing. TJie Scriptures are also the Word of Him, hy whom we Shall he judged, and rewarded. The day is hastening, when we shall be called to an account for all our conduct ; and shall be compelled to rehearse it before him. If we have done well ; if we have obeyed, worshipped, and glorified him, and- served our generation according to his will ; we shall be acquitted in this great trial, and received to everlasting glory. If we have done evil, and refused to do good ; we shall be driven away to final and irremediable per dition. Whenever we are assembled to hear the Gospel, we are to re member, that with reference to all these solemn things it is the Word of God. 2. That we are sinners, who infinitely need forgiveness and sal vation. As sinners, we are irreversibly condemned by that divine law, which we have broken, and by that just government, against which we have rebelled. The soul that sinneth shall die, was the origi nal sentence of that law to mankind ; the sentence of Hira, who can neither deceive, nor change. The sentence will, therefore, be executed in its sfrict meaning on all, who disobey, and who do not become interested in the Redemption of Christ. Under such a sentence, infinitely dreadful, and unalterably certain, our danger is immensely great, and our ruin entire. From this sentence, therefore, we infinitely need a deliverance. Our all is at stake ; and our souls are in a situation of the most terrible hazard. Hell, if we continue in this situation, is open before us, and destruction hath no covering. 78 y THE MEANS OF GRACE. [SER. CXXXVIII. It is impossible, that any beings should be in a state of more ab solute and pressing necessity. Rational, immortal, and incapable of perishing by annihilation ; we must be, and be for ever. But to exist for ever, and yet to be sinful and miserable only ; is a doom, compared with which, all other characters and sufferings lose their deformity and wretchedness, and rise into happiness and distinc tion. When we are present in the house of God, we should recall with deep affection this intense and melancholy necessity ; and feel the declarations of Scripture with a concern, suited to the in estimable importance of our situation. 3. That the Scriptures are the Book, in which alone the terms, and means^ of salvation are published. The Word Gospel; as you know, signifies good tidings, or joy ful news. This name is given to the Scriptures generally, and to the New Testament particularly, because they contain the best of all tidings, ever published' to this ruined world. Independently of the Gospel, all the race of Adam are under a sentence of con demnation, without a friend,, and without a hope. To these for lorn and miserable beings, the infinitely merciful God has been pleased to make known a way of escape ; a deliverance from de struction. This glorious communication is made to mankind in the Scriptures only. From no other source has man ever learn ed, that God is reconcileable on any terms ; that sinners can be forgiven; that there is in the universe an Atoneraent for sin; or that any atonement will be accepted. From no other source have we been informed, that God 'will be pleased with any wor ship, which we can render ; or, if he will, what that worship is. Without the Scriptures, we know not, that the connexion between God and man, between heaven and earth, can be re newed ; or that the g?ites, which admit intelligent beings to the world of enjoyment, have been, or will ever be, opened to apos tate creatures. To beings, in circumstances of such necessity and danger, ti dings even of partial deliverance must be delightful. But these are tidings of complete deliverance from sin, and of an entire es cape from misery. To beings, left in absolute ignorance of recon- cihation to God, and in absolute despair of future enjoyment ; to whom the world of happiness was shut, and to whom the ages of eternity rolled onward no bright reversion ; even the uncertain rumour of relief must, one would imagine, echo throughout every region" of the globe, which they inhabited, and thrill with inex- ;^ressible emotions in every heart. But these are certain tidings from God Himself concerning tbis glorious possession ; from the God, who cannot deceive ; the God, whose promises endure for ever. This great salvation is, however, proffered by God on his own terms only. In the same Scriptures are these terms found. From them alone can we learn on what conditions we may obtain hfe, SER. CXXXVIII.] HEARING THE WORD OF GOD. ^ 7^ and escape from death. The way of holiness, to which the Gospel alone chrects us, is there made a highway ; and wayfaring men, though fools, need not err therein. In the Scriptures, also, are the means of this Divine, and immor tal, attainment presented to our view. Here we are taught, that we become possessed of a title to everlasting life by Faith, Repent ance, and Hohness. Here, also, is pointed out the way, in which these indispensable characteristics are communicated ; viz. the Means of Grace, already mentioned in these discourses. Both the Means, and the terms, are eminently reasonable and desirable ; in themselves real and superior good, and the way to greater good ; easy of adoption and use, and, with the divine blessing, efficacious to the end, for which they are used ; sanctioned with supreme au thority by the testimony of God, and daily confirmed by their ac tual idluence on multitudes of mankind. When, therefore, we hear the Word of God, we are ever to remember, that we are taught things, in this respect infinitely interesting to us, and incapable of being derived from any other source. 4. That in order to be saved we must understand the Means, and the Terms, of salvation. There is no other Word of God, but the Scriptures : and, be side God, there is no other being, who can inform us what we must do to he saved. Philosophers may investigate, and write, from generation to generation: this vast momentous subject has ever Iain, and will ever lie, beyond their reach, Those who read, and understood, the insfructions ofthe ancient philosophers, were nev er reformed by their doctrines. Those who read, and understand, the moral systems of Infidel philosophers, are never amended by them, but corrupted of course. The Scriptures, on the contra ry, have been the means of renewing, and reforming, millions of the human race. But this sacred book was never of the least use to any man, by whom it was not in some good measure under stood. To enable mankind at large to understand it, God insti tuted the Evangelical Ministry. All complicated objects of the intellect are far better known by sober reflection, and dihgent re search, than they can be by casual, or cursory, thinking. The Scriptures contain a system immensely complicated. They de mand, therefore, the most patient, persevering study, and thorough investigation. Hence Ministers, consecrated originally to this em ployment, are commanded to give themselves wholly to the Minis try ; particularly to reading and to meditation ; that they may not be novices, nor furnish reasons to others for regarding their dis courses with contempt. But all their labours will be to no pur pose, unless those, who hear them, understand their discourses ; however evangelically, and usefully, they may be written. Every hearer, therefore, should solemnly call to mind, in the house of God, that the means, and terms, of eternal life, then are published 80 MEANS OF GRACE. [&ER. CXXXVIU. to him ; that they are found no where, but in the Scriptures ; and that the Scriptures can be of no benefit to him, unless he under stands them. His highest interest, and indispensable duty, de mand of him therefore, that he should hear, as for his hfe. It ought to be added, that all these things are not only explain ed in the Scriptures, but enforced on the heart with supreme power and efficacy. Motives, of amazing import, are here pre sented, to persuade the sinner to repentance. Alarms compel ; invitations allure ; threatenings terrify; and promises encourage; of such a nature, and exhibited in such a manner, as boundless Wisdom and Goodness thought best fitted to affect the heart. But all these, also, are in vain, unless heard, understood, and realized, by the sinner. 5. We are further to remember, that our opportunities of hearing the Word of God are few ; and that that, which we- are enjoying, is not improbably the best, which will ever arrive: Our life itself is but a vapour, which appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away. Of this life, the opportunities of hear ing the Gospel compose only a little part. The Sabbath is almost the only season, aillotted to this end : a seventh part merely ofour time; and, as actually enjoyed by us, a much less proportion. By the weakness of childhood, the thoughtlessness of youth, and the hindrances of riper years, the number of Sabbaths, which we are ableto employ in gaining salvation, is greatly reduced. If those, which we lose in this manner by negligence, and by devo tion to the world, be taken from the whole nuraber ; we shall find those, which reraain, fewer by far than we are usually aware : few, in themselves ; few, especially, for so great and important a work. How many Sabbaths remain to us at any time, we can in no degree conjecture. That the number must be small, and that it may be still smaller, we know : but whether the present Sabbath be not the last, we can never knovv. Were we assured, that it was the last ; with what anxiety, care, and diligence, should we devote it to the attainment of endless life ! As it may be the last ; it ought to be regarded with the same anxiety. Whether it be, or be not the last ; it is unquestionably the best, opportunity, that we shall enjoy. It is in our possession : all others are merely expected. It is the Sabbath on which-we are less hardened, and less guilty, than we shall ever be at any future period. God is now reconcileable. Before another Sabbath arrives. He may cast us off. His own command is. To-day, if ye will hear my voice, harden not your hearts. Behold, now, says St. Paul, is ihe accepted time ! Behold, now is the day of salvation! Whenever, therefore, we are assembled to hear the word of God upon the Sabbath, we should solemnly feel, that we possess the best opportunity of obtaining everlasting life, .which we shall ever enjoy. SER, CXXXVni.] HEARING THE WORD OF GOD. 81 6. We are also to remember, that the Scriptures are the word, by zuhich we shall be finally judged. Whose soever sins ye remit, says our Saviour to his Apostles, they are remitted; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained. In other words, "I commission you to pubhsh the terms of hfe and death to mankind. He, whose life shall be condejnned by the terms, which by the inspfration of the Holy Ghost I will enable you to announce, shall be condemned by me in the judgment. On the confrary, him, whose life shall be approved by these terms, I will approye at the. final day." All these terms of remitting, and retaining sin, as pubKshed by the Apostles, we now have in the Gospel : and they are continually, preached' in the house of God. How infinitely imp^tant is it, that they should be infixed in our understanding, our memory, and pur hearts ; that we may always know, remember, and feel them ; that they may be the source, and the pilde, of all. our conduct ; and that by theni we nmy, in the end,, not only Ije judged, but justified also, and re- •warded! ^^ Let every personj then, \vho is present at the preaching of the Gospel, call to mind, that he is hearing the very terms of his fmal acquittal, or condemnation. Let him also remember, that one of the grounds of that seritence, which he will receive from the Judge of th^quick and the deade, will be, that he is then taking heed^ how he hears ; or that he is refusing, or neglecting, to perform this so lemn duty. ,- : ' 7. We are to remember, that God is present, to .observe the, man ner, in which we hear. , This consideration is of infinite moment ; and ought with su preme force to come home to every heart. Let me beseech every member of this Assembly to think, how great arid awful a Being God is. Remember how absolutely you are indebted to- him for life, and breath, and all ihings which you have enjoyed ; and how entirely you depend upon' him for every thing,: which you hope to enjoy either in this world, or that which is to corae. Remember how grossly you have sinned against hira, by violating his holy Law ; and how mercifully He has invited yoii to repent, and re turn to your obedience. Think how aggravated will be the guilt of refusing to return, when thus Invited ; how entirely you are in his hands ; and how impossible it is, that you should escape from his power. Reahze that his eye, as a fiame of fire, pervades, and enlightens, all the secret retreats of the workers of iniquity ; and that He sees, and records, every wandering, stupid, Worldly, and disobe dient thought. Remember, that He will require you .to rehearse before him the raanner, in which you hear his Word this day. How immensely interesting are, these considerations to every person in this assembly! Who, in a full and realizing, who, even Vol. IV. 1 1 82 IHE MEANS OF GRACE. [SER. CXXXVIII. in the most imperfect and casual view of them, can fail, with su preme solicitude, to take heed how he hears ? 8. As all things, contained in the Scriptures, are wise, and right, and good ; so we are to remember, that they are worthy of all ac ceptation. My audience may remember, that I originally proposed to con sider the manner, in which Sinners' may hear, the Gospel, with rational hopes of being benefited by it. The^earing of the Gos pel I exhibited as one of the means o^grace ; and mentioned, that I should discuss it as such, and not as a theme of general investi gation. To this view of the subject 1 have therefore confined myself; and have purposely omitted many observatiens, which might be usefully made, concerning tbis subject, to persons who are already Christians. Almost all the observations, which I have made, are indeed, in their full force, applicable to them also. To Sinners they are all apphcable ; and are all, in every sense, in their power, while they continue Sinners. The last is as ti-uly of this nature, as those which preceded it. Every Sinner may, antecedently to his regeneration, entertain a full conviction, that the Scriptures are worthy of all accepta tion. With this conviction, solemnly impressedxjn the mind, every sinner may hear the Gospel. Every sinner may, also, feel this truth in a strong and affecting manner. « Awakened to a sense of his guilt and danger, he does thus actually feel, antecedently to any essential change in his moral character. But what some sin ners do feel, all others may feel. But under this conviction, and this sense, all those are sanctified, who are sanctified at all. With these very views of divine truth upon their minds, the Spirit of God communicates to them, I do not mean to every one who is in this situation ; for this I am not warranted to say, nor to believe ; but to most of them, perhaps to all who do not voluntarily relin quish their convictions ; that change of heart, which is commonly styled'Regeneration : a change, infinitely important to every child of Adam. Faith, says St, Paul, cometh by hearing. I have endeavoured to describe the manner of hearing, in which it comes. It is to be still carefully remembered, that, unless Faith is actually obtained, and exercised ; no raode of hearing whatever will ultimately be of any value. The mode, which I have pointed out, is, in my appre hension, inestimably valuable, as means, erainently useful to this great end. What is true of hearing the Gospel is substantially true of Read ing it ; and of Reading, also, other Religious books. The Scrip tures particularly, and other religious books generally, are to be read with care ; and with all the views, which I have expressed; that we may be able to judge whether those, who preach to us, preach the Truth of God. They are to be read also, that we may keep alive, and in full force, the impressions communicated by SEK. CXXXVin.] HEARING THE WORD OF GOD. 83 Preaching. Finally, they are to be read, that we may gain the lull advantages of all our opportunities between the returns of the Sabbath ; and furnish oui-selves with daily instruction, with re proofs for our daily sins, with encouragement to our daily du ties, and wilh powerful motives to a daily progress in the divine life. REMARKS 1. From these Observations ii is evident, that those, who do not hear in the manner which hcis been described, are, even according to their own principles, wholly'inexcusable. All persons, present at the preaching of the Gospel, can, if they please, solemnly remember, that it is the Word of God ; that they are sinners, who infinitely need salvation ; that in the Gospel only, the terms, and means, of salvation are published to mankind ; that these, in order to he of any wse to them, must he understood by them selves ; that their opportunities of hearing it are few; and that the present is the best, and may he the last, which they will ever enjoy : that the Scriptures contain all the rules of life, by which they will be judged; that God is an eye-witness of the manner, in which they hear; and that the Gospel is worthy of all acceptation, and ought, there fore, to be received with the heart, as well as with the ¦understanding. To hear in this manner, demands no especial comraunication from God : and he, who does not thus hear, is stripped of the pretence even of self-justification. It is, indeed, equally the duty of every man to hear with Evangelical Faith. But as this Faith is the gift of God, unrenewed men are ever prone to feel themselves, in some degree, excusable in neglecting to hear with this exercise of the heart. This apprehension is, I acknowledge, entirely without foundation. Still it exists. But in the present case, on their own ground, no plea can be offered, which will even satisfy themselves. Let them therefore, when guilty of this negligence, lay their hands upon thefr mouths, and their mouths in the dust, and confess their guilt before God. Of this miserable class of sinners not a small number are. Sab bath by Sabbath, seen in this house. Almost all who assemble here, are in the morning of life ; when, if fever, the heart is tender, and easily susceptible of divine impressions fromthe word of God. Almost all enjoy, also, the peculiar blessings of a liberal and re ligious education, and the best opportunities of knowing their duty, and their danger. Still, in defiance of the solemn commands of Religion, and the authority erf God, as well as of coramon decency; there are those, who quietly lay their heads down to sleep,'when the prayer is ended, or the psalm read. These persons are indeed present in the house of God. But they are present, only to insult him ; to cast contempt upon the Cross of Christ ; and to grieve in the most shamefiil manner the Spirit of Grace. They can hardly 84 THE MEANS OF GRACE. [SEB. CXXXVIII. be said to hear at all. They come into the presence of God, mere ly, to declare to Him, and to all who are present, that they will not hear, nor obey, his voice ; and to treasure up wrath against the day of wrath, and the revelation of the Judgment. Let them remem ber, that the God who made them, and in whose hands their breath is, is here ; and that his All-Searching eye is fixed with an intense and dreadful survey upon their conduct and upon their hearts. Let them remember, that He hath said. Because I have called, and ye refused; Ihave stretched out my hand, and ye have not regarded : but ye have set at nought all my counsel, and would none of mij rt- proof : I also will laugh at your calamity, and mock when your fear cometh ; when your fear cometh as desolation, and your destruction as a whirlwind. Theri shall ye call, but Iwill not answer. Ye shall seek me early, and shall not find me :' because ye hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the Lord. Let those also, vvho with more decency, and more momentary wisdom, really hear, and yet with the slightest temptations forget what they hear ; vessels, into which the water of life is poured, only to be poured out again ; remember, that they hear to no valua ble end. The true end of this privilege is Repentance towards God, and Faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ. This end they prevent in themselves by an absolute destitution of serious and deep con cern for their salvation. In their final ruin they will find little com fort in remembering this frail, feeble attention to the Word of God. It will be a melancholy support in that terrible day, to say to thefr Judge, We have eaten and drunk in thy presence ; and thou hast taught in our streets ; when they hear him reply, Departfrom me, for I know you not, ye workers of iniquity. 2. How infinitely desirable is it, that we should hear with good and honest hearts ! This, and this only, is obeying, in the proper sense,. the com mand of our Saviour. As the Gospel is plainly worthy of all ac ceptation ; to accept it in this manner is the indispensable duty of every man, to whom it is preached. To this end, we should re member, that our all is depending ; our virtue, usefulness, and peace in the present life ; our hope and support in death ; our ac quittal in the judgment, our escape from final perdition ; and our infroduction to eternal glOry in the kingdom of our heavenly Father. What dreadful emotions must every careless, stupid sin ner, experience on a death-bed, when he calls to mind, that he squandered, with infinite prodigality, all his opportunities of gaining Salvation ; and cast away the blessings of comfort and hope for ever ! Amid the soleran scenes of, such a bed, when life is frem- bhng, and fluttering, over the abyss of destruction ; the pulse forgetting to beat ; the soul struggling, and chnging to its tene ment of clay, with awful anticipations of the Judgment ; how over- - whelming must it be to reraember, that every prayer and sermon, SEK. CXXXVIII] HEARING THE WORD OF GOD. 25 that the Gospel itself and all the blessings which it contains, al though so frequendy offered by God with infinite kindness, were only despised, neglected, and forgotten! But the lamp is now gone out ; the oil expended ; and the door shut. Nothing, there fore, remains to the infatuated votary of sense and sin, but the bladmess of darkness for ever ! SERMON CXXXIX. THE ORDINARY MEANS OP GRACE. THE NATURE, SEASONS, AND OBLIGATIONS OP PRAYER. 1 Thessalonians v. 17. — Pray without ceasing. The preceding discourse was occupied by considerations on the two first of those Means of Grace, which were formerly men tioned ; viz. The Preaching and Hearing of the Gospel, and the Reading of the Scriptures and other Religious Books. I shall now proceed to the examination of the third of those Means ; viz. Prayer* In this examination I shall depart from the scheme, which was pursued in the preceding discourse; and shall consider the subject generally ; under the following heads : I. The Nature, and II. The Seasons, of Prayer; III. The Obligations to pray ; . IV. The Usefulness of Prayer ; ' ' V. The Encouragements to it ; and, VI. The Objections, usually made against it. I. I shall briefiy consider the Nature of Prayer. Prayer, according to the language of the Westminster Catechism, is the Offering up ofour desires to God for things agreeable to his Will, in the name of Christ, with confession of our sins, and a thankful acfcnowledgment of his mercies. This definition is undoubtedly just. Yet it is in a. degree defective. Prayer is an act of worship, consisting of four great parts ; Adoration, Confession, Petition, and Thanksgiving. The first of these. Adoration, consists in solemnly reciting the character of God ; and in reverentially ascribing to him the glo ry, due to his name for the infinite perfections, which he possess es, and for all the manifestations, which he has made of himself in his Word, and in his works. The second. Confession, depiands no comment. The third. Petition, is both by reason and Revelation confined to things, which are agreeable tq the Will of God. His Will in volves whatever is right, and good : and nothing, which is not agreeable to it, is in reality desirable. Thanksgiving, the last of these subjects, is so generally, and so well, understood, as to need no explanation at the present time. SER. CXXXIX.] THE NATURE, SEASONS, &c. 87 All these are to.be offered up to God in the name of Christ, in obedience to his express command. Unless they are so offered, they cannot, under the Christian dispensation, be accepted. II. The principal Seasons of Prayer are the following. 1. The Sabbath. On this holy Day, we are required to devote ourselves to this duty in a peculiar manner. A prirae part of the religious service, to which it is destined, consists of Prayer. For this reason, the sanctuary is appropriately styled the house of prayer. Thus God says in Isaiah, I will make them joyful in my house of prayer ; and again. My house shall be called a house of prayer for all people. These promises immediately respect Christian nations ; and teach in the clearest manner the proper destination of the house of God, and of the day, upon which, especially, it is occupied by religious assemblies. The Jewish Church worshipped in this ma.nner on their Sabbath ; and the primitive Christian Church on the Lordis Day. These examples have been followed, in every age of Chris tianity, by those, who, in any country, have worn the Christian name. Nor is the Sabbath a season of public prayer only. It is equal ly to be employed in private prayer. On this sacred day, God has required a peculiar attention to all our religious duties ; at home, as well as in the Sanctuary. Every advantage for this pur pose is furnished by this heavenly season. The consecration of this holy day by the Fourth Command, by his own resting upon the first Sabbath, and by the Resurrection of the Redeeraer ; the cel ebration of it by the Church in all the ages of tirae ; the blessing, originally annexed to it ; and the sanctification, acquired, and in creased, in the minds of many millions of the human race, all unite to designate it as being pre-eminently the season of prayer. With these affecting views of the Sabbath,, all others conspire. On this day, mankind assemble in the house of God as brethren, and as children of the same Divine Parent, to worship their Cre ator ; to learn his holy Will ; and to obtain a tide to endless life. Here, ' with one united voice they donfess their sins before him. Hither they come, to acknowledge their dependance on him for the coraraunication of every blessing, and the fulfilment' of every hope. Here, they stand as mere supphants for mercy ; for the forgiveness of their sins, and the renovation of their souls. Hith er they come, to be employed only in religious thoughts, affec tions, and pursuits ; to act as spiritual and immortal beings ; and to appear as candidates for everlasting hfe. Here; the word of God is presented to, them as a Law, immutable and eternal, which they have violated, and by which they are condemned ; as the news, and means', of restoration to safety, hope, and hfe; asthe manifestation of his character, and our own ; and as the tidings pf a future resurrection, judgment, and immortality. Hither they come, on this sacred day, into the immediate. presence of God, as the 88 THE NATURE, SEASONS, [SER, CXXXIX. reconcileable Father of mankmd ; infinitely great, venerable, and lovrely, in his character. Here, they behold tbe Saviour in all hi^ peculiar glory and beauty, his transcendent compassion and self- denial. His condescension and humiliation, his preaching' and miracles, his sufferings and death, his resurrection and exaltation, are here presented in his Word and Ordinances, pencilled by the hand of Jehovah. This holy season is the day, appointed by God himself, as a perpetual Festival, for the commemoration of these glorious things ; especially of the Creation and Redemption of mankind ; and of the Divine perfections, raanifested in these wonderful works. As such a festival it is regarded, and acknowledged, by all, who as semble for his worship. To all these things, the strong power of sympathy lends an in terest, a solemnity, a capacity for affecting the soul, unrivalled in its nature, and attainable in no other situation. As on the Sabbath these things are eminently felt in the House of God ; so the spirit, imbibed here, is extended to every thing of the same nature, when contemplated in our own dwellings. Thith er we carry the feelings, originated in the sanctuary ; and there we prolong the views, which the Sabbath has already inspired. In both places, therefore, we are furnished with advantages for pray ing fervently, and acceptably, at this happy season, which obvi ously make the Sabbath, by way of distinction, the Day of Prayer. 2. Such, Occasional Days, as are warranted by the Word of God; and appointed hy the rulers of mankind for public worship, are, also, important seasons of Prayer, Public annual Festivals for national thanksgiving, and public days of national humiliation and prayer, were enjoined by God upon the Israelites ; the only nation, to whom, as such, he ever gave laws and institutions. The institutions and laws of Moses are binding on us no farther, than as they are applicable to our circumstances. Political and ceremonial branches. of this system are not, and cannot be, applicable to the state of any modern, or Christian, nation. They are, therefore, abrogated; as we are amply assured in the Scriptures themselves. But these nation al thanksgivings, and fasts, are no less applicable to the state of other nations, than to that ofthe Israelites, For all nations equal ly with them, have sins to be confessed and lamented, and bless ings to be remembered and acknowledged. God, also, has been pleased to regard, in a favourable and merciful manner, public fasts, not directly appointed by himself. Thus when the Ninevites, alarmed by the prediction of Jonah, kept a day of solemn humilia tion and fasting for their sins, God repented of the evil, that he said he would do unto them ; and he did it not. In consequence of the fast, also, of the Jezus in Shushan, on account of the ruin, threat ened to their nation by the malicious fraud of Haman, God ac complished their deliverance in a manner equally wonderful and SER. CXXXIX.] AND OBLIGATIONS OF VRAVER. 89 glorious. Important blessiligs seem also to have been given, in consequence ofihe fasts, proclaimed severally by E%ra and Nehe miah, The public services of these days are usually the same with those of the Sabbath. Prayer, particularly, is a prime part of them all. On such days the ancient Churches assemble to acknowledge the goodness of God to them, and to confess and la ment their sins against him. In these religious solemniti^, they have been followed extensively by the Church* in later times. 3. The Morning and Evening of every day, are in a peculiar man ner seasons of Prayer, ' This truth was taught directly by the morning and evening sac rifice, under the Mosaic dispensation, Aaron, and the succeed ing High Priests, were commanded, Exod. xxx. 7, to burn iricense on the altar of ificens^ every morning. See also ExOd. xxxvi. 3 ; Exod. xl. ; Levit. vi, 12, In like manner the evening sacrifice and oblation are often mentioned ; as in 1 Kings xviii. 29 ; 2 Kings xvi, 15 ; Ezra. ix. 4 ; and Dan. ix. 21. _ . In cdnforinity to thc language of this institution, David declares, that he steadily performed this reUgious duty every morning and every evening, and also at noon every day. Daniel prayed to his God three times a day. Job also ofiered sacrifice in the morn ing. In the same manner, unquestionably. Worshipped all the pious men of ancient times. With the Scriptures, the Nature of the case perfectly accords. In the Morning, we are solemnly, called upon to remember the protection, which God has extended to us through the night: a season, in vvhich we were-' wholly unable to protect ourselves. We are required to recollect also, that he has graciously given us the blessing of sleep, and the peace and safety, with which we have rested upon our beds. He, vvho does not praise God for these indispensable gifts, must be alike ungrateful and stupid. In the Morning, also, we are about to enter upon the business of the day ; and Stand, therefore, in absolute need of the Divine pro tection, favour, and blessing. How wretched should we be, and how useless, unless our food and raiment, our health, and sfrength our reaison and all our other useful faculties, were continued in our possession ! Equally do we need security against temptation and sin, danger and harm. But for all these we are entirely de pendent on God alone. In the evening, we are solemnly obligated to remember with the deepest gratitude the blessings of the day. These are -the bless ings which we supplicated in the morning ; and vvhich God has been pleased to bestow upon us, notwithstanding our sins. In the Evening, also, we are about to lay ourselves down to sleep. Be side Hira, we have no protector; and to Him we must be indebted both for the sleep itself, and for the peace and safety, without which it cannot be enjoyed. Vol. IV. 12 go I'HE NATURE, SEASONS, [SER. CXXXIX. Stated and regular seasons are indispensable to the effectual performance of all business. Method, proverbially styled the sold of business, cannot exist without such seasons. Irregrilarity, which is the preverition, or tbe ruin, of all valuable efforts, grows ©f course out of irregular distributions of time. That, which is done at accidental seasons only, is ultimately not done at all. No business demands regularity, and method, more than Prayer. There is in all men, naturally, a strong indisposition to pray. Stated seasons, therefore, returning at regular periods, are pecul iarly necessary to preserve this duty in its full vigour. He, who prays at such seasons,'will always remember this duty ; will form bis schemes of life so as to provide the proper places for perform ing it; will be reproached by his conscience for neglecting it; will keep alive the spirit of prayer from one season to another,, so ds to render the practice delightful ; and will be preserved, uninter ruptedly, in the practice, by the strong infiuence of habit. He, who prays at accidental seasons only, will first neglect, then hate, arid finally dsesist from this duty. Tfoe Morning and Evening are seasons peculiarly fitted for the regular returns of prayer. They occur atinteryals, perfiactly con venient ; terminate, successively, our sleep and our labour ; arfe seasons necessarily distinguished ; remind us regularly pf all that, for which we should pray ; and are effectual means of .establishing in us immoveable habits of praying. They involve every tbing, therefore, which can be either asked, or wished, for this interesting purpose. As thesle are seasons eminently advantageous for secret prayer; so they are almost the only possible seasons for the united devotion of Families. Then, and then only, are all the members customa rily present. Then, the fafnily business is either riot begun, or ended; and all are at leisure to employ themselves in the worship of God. Strangers, then, do not intrude ; and in this manner pre vent the performance of the duty. Every thing, therefore, con curs at these seasons,''to promote, and establish, the method, regu larity, and habit, which, necessary always, are indispensable -where numbers are concerned. 4. The times, at which we receive our food, areproper seasons of prayer. On food we depend for the continuance of life ; and, of course, for the enjoyment of all other temporal good. On this blessmg, also, depends in the like manner the continuance of our probation ; and, therefore, all our future spiritual good, so far as it will be gained in the present world. With this good, are inseparably con nected, also, those immortal blessings, which God will communicate as its proper reward beyond the grave. Hence the communication of tbis blessing demands of us peculiar attention, gratitude, and acknowledgments. SER. GXXXK.] AND OBLIGATIONS OF PRAYER. 91 These, accojdingly, the Scriptures require every where at our hands. Every creature of God, say they, is good, if it be received with thanksgiving. They inform us also, that it is sanctified hy the Word of God, that is, his express permission to use it, and by Pretger. They further teach us, that God created meats, to he re ceived zoitk thanksgiving by them who believe, and know, the truth. In these passages they teach us, that meats were created for this end, that they should be received by us with thanksgiving ; and that, if they are not thus received, the end of their creation is not accomplished ; that they are'not good, when not thus received ; and that they are not sanctified without Prayer. The Scriptures also direct us, that whether we eat or drmk, or whatsoever we do, we should do all to the glory pf God. But when we receive our food, whatever emotions we may experience within, we cannot glorify Gpd before our fellow-men, except by asking for his blessing up on it, and rendering to him our praise for the bounty, by vvhich it is daily supplied. In conformity with these precepts, David often solemnly prais es God for the communication of this -blessing to Mmself; and calls upon all mankind to unite in The praise. The primitive Christians are exhibited by St. Paul as eating, and giving God thanks ; or, in other words, as giving God thanks, -when they re ceived their food. Our Saviour, the perfect example to all his followers, blessed the fijod, provid^ for himself arid those aroend him, to t^ch us, that it is our duty always to ask that blessing of God upoB our own meals, without which they cannot be either useful, or desfrable enj(^ments. The same glorious Person, al so, gave thanks uriiformly to God for the bounties of his Provi dence, to show us, that we are always to remember, with gratkudse and praise, the Divine Goodness in supplying our wants, and in thus p|K>longing our lives. From this glorious example, and these most reasonable precepts, are derived ample proofs of this important duty, and the most powerful motives to perform invariably, faithfully, and with sincere delight, sp desirable a service. The very Heathen were so sensible of the propriety, and obli gation, of this duty, as enjoined by the religion of nature, that, to a great extent, they steadily made Kbations to their gods before their meals, as an acknowledgment of their indebtedness to them for their daily food. He therefore, who in ,a Christian country neglects to praise God for his own food, cannot with propriety be called a Heathen. He may with more fitness be styled an animal. Nay, in some respects, he degrades himself below the brute*. Per the ox knoweth his owner, and the ass his master'' s crib : But he doth not know, nor even consider. 5. Beside these regular Seasons of Prayer, there are many ethers continually occurring, zuhich can be designated by no general name. 92 THE NATURE, SEASONS, ; [SER CXXXIX. The times, at which all peculiar blessings. are bestowed on, us, are times of Prayer. Whenever we are successful in any impor tant concern, and are especially prospered, supported, or com forted : whenever we, or purs, are delivered from frojj.l^le or want, pain or sickness : whenever we escape from peculiar temptations ; are placed in safety ; and furnished with strength, peace, hope, and joy, with the peculiar blessings of Christian fellowship, the rectification of our views, and the improvement of our rehgious affections, we are especially summoned to the .duties of Prayer and thanksgiving.^ -, • *^ In the same manner, is Prayer our especial duty at those sea sons, in which we are peculiarly distressed in body or in mind; are in pecuhar danger ; are, exposed peculiarly to temptations ; are sick ; are bereaved of beloved friends ; are threatened with alarming evils ; or whenever we find ourselveaJ'the subjects of pe culiar sloth, reluctance to our duty, or ready to repine at the- dis pensations of God's Providence, or to distrust his faithfulness, or his mercy. Nor are vve less, obviously called to the, duties of Prayer and Thanksgiving by the peculiar prosperity or distresses, the dan gers or deliverances, of our Country; I speak not, here, of this duty, as performed in public. I refer irnmediately to the per formances of the J closet. ' Nq man can safely, or warrantably, ne glect the interests of his .country in his secret devotions. As its interests ought ever to be near his heart ; so they ought ever to be remembered, vvhen he comes into the presence of God. In the same nia,nrier, the great concerns of the Church of Gpd ought continually to be subjects of fervent supplication. If I for get thee, O Jerusalem, sajth the Psalmist, let my right hund forget her cunning : if I do not remember thee, let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth. All the wants and woes, all the blessings and consolations ofthe Church of God, should be felt, as the personal concerns of every Christian ; and, as such, should ascend up in his daily devotions before the throne of his Maker. I only add, that both Reason and Revelation have raade it our plain duty to pray for all men. At the tiraes also, when we ourselves commence any important business, journey, or other undertaking, which is of particular consequence to our well-being. We are required to begin our efforts with humble petitions for the guidance, protection, and blessing, of God. Retirement, likewise, and Solitude, the lonely walk, the chamber of meditation, and the peaceful pillow, being peculiarly friendly to this solemn employment, sumraon us to it with peculiar mo tives. Of these occasions, generally, whether alluded to, or specified, it is to be observed, that they return more or less every day, run through life, and end only at death. All of them demand either sijent or audible acknowledgments bf our constant dependence on SER. CXXXIX.] AND OBLIGATIONS OF PRAYER. 93 God, and our absolute indebtedness to him for, all good. They demand a lively sense of his Presence, Perfections, and Govern ment, our supreme love, and unchanging confidence, to be exer cised towards him ; our daily comraunion with hira, and our entire devotion to his service. Of all these. Prayer is the vehicle, the su|k)ort, the soul. With it, they will live, and flourish ; without it,;(hey will die. According to these observations, the Text directs us' io pray without ceasing. In the same manner, the Apostle else where directs us io pray always with all prayer ; and in everything to make known our requests unto God, with suppUcation and thanks giving. In this manner, the Prophets and Saints of the Old Tes tament, and the Apostles and Christians of the New, lived before God. ¦ Prayer was the breath, by which their piety was supported and preserved. Thus lived Christ himself; apd thus by his ex ample he has taught us to live. Immediately before he ordained his Apostles, he spent the whole night in Prayer ; iind this was a characteristical specimen of his life. Let ihe same mind be in you, which was also in Christ, III. / shall nozu 'briefly consider our Obligations to perform this duty, 1, To pray to God -is a natural dictate of the human mind ; a dic tate of conscience and common sense,. We are absolutely dependent on God for all good. Tp know this, is to know a truth, of immense importance to the moral sys tem at large, and to each individual, of which this system is com posed. To feel ifwith acquiescence, and joy, is to conform in our feelings, to that state of things, which is agreeable to the Will of God, and of course to absolute rectitude. We are bound to de light in such a dependence on the glorious and perfect Jehovah ; infinitely gi-eat, and wise, and good, as he is ; and able, and dis posed, as he is, to supply all our wants, and to furnish us vvith ev ery real blessing. But a spirit of dependence is more awakened, chei;ished, and preserved, by Prayer, than by all things else. But to cherish, and preserve, it in our minds, is the indispensable duty, and the supreme interest, of raan. Few things contribute, in the sarae degree, to render us excellent, araiable, or approved by God. Without it, we can neither be approved, amiable, nor excellent. In this view, therefore, the iraportance of prayer cannot be es timated. Prayer is also the only method, which Nature points out, of ob taining blessings from God. To Prayer,, as this raethod, we are directed by our eariiest circumstances in childhood. By asking, we originally expect to gain, and actually gain, all tlfe bl^essings, which are given to us by our Parents. What they grant to our petitions, comraon sense directs us to hope from God, in answer to similar petitions. Frora analogy, which is fairly presumed to be conclusive, we determine, that the mode of obtaining good, 94 THE NATURE, SEASONS, [SER. CXXXIX. which his Providence has formed for our direction with respect to earthly parents, and benefactors, is the mode, which we Ougbt to pursue, whenever we seek to obtain good immediately from him, our Heavenly Parent, and Divine Benefactor. As this conduct is universal, it is justly concluded to be natural. For, we have no higher proof, that any thing is natural, than the fact, that it exists in all men, of all ages and nations. The Heathen universally prayed. Of this service their worship was in a great measure constituted. From California to Japan we find this, every where, its leading feature ; and from the first peri ods, recorded in history, to the present time. There are but two sources, whence this conduct can have been derived : the conclu sions of Reason, and the dictates of Revelation. If it was deriv ed from Reason, then it was demanded by Reason ; if from. Reve lation, then it is required by God. 2. IVhat Nature has thus dictated, and pursued, the Scriptures have expressly enjoined. It will be unnecessary for me to multiply quotations on this sub ject. The Text, and the other passages already recited, are more than sufficient to settle the point, were it at all in dispute. But no truth is better known, or more abundantly acknowledged. I shall, therefore, only observe, that these commands are invested with all the authority of God. 3. Thcr Example of Christ is ofthe same obligatory force, Christ, as is vvell known, lived a life of continual and extraordi nary Prayer ; and thus accorded with that general peediction in the 89th Psalm, He shall cry unto me. Thou art my Feitlier, and my God, and the Rock of my salvation. Accordingly, St. Paul testifies of Him, Heb. v. 7, that in the days of his fiesh he offered vp prayers and supplications, with strong crying and tears, unto Him, that was able to save \imfrom death ; and was heard in that he feared. This Example, you know, is not only a pattern, and a motive ; but a law also, binding us with divine authority. 4. Our own Well-being may with strict propriety he added to tliese Obligations, as a reason of high and commanding imports God has taught us, that he will be inquired of by mankind /or thi good, which he is pleased to bestow uppn them. The only prom ise, that he will give, or that we shall receive, blessings, is made to such as ask. Ask, and ye. shall receive; seek, and ye shall find ; knock, and it shall be opened to you ; is the only language of Rev elation concerning this subject. Supplication/or g6od, therefore, is the only condition, upon which it can be hoped. But we en tirely need, and God is infinitely able, and dispose^ to give, all that is really good for us. To such as ask, he will give : fi"om such as ask not, he will withhold. Of course, those, who will not pray, will never receive. On our Prayers, then, according to the only ordinance of God with respect to this subject, all our good depends in one important SEB. CXXXIX.] AND OBLIGATIONS OF PRAYER. 95 sense, both for time and eternity. We may, indeed, and we actu ally do, receive many things in this world, really good in them selves, for which we do not pray- But they are not; and, so long as we neglect to pray, will not be, good to us. To those, who omit this duty, even the blessings, bestowed by God, cease to be blessings. Prayer purifies theneart for the reception of them ; and removes the temptations, which, good as they are in them selves, they cannot fail to present to the passions and appetites even of a rehgious raan. In eternity, those, who in this world neglect to pray, will expe rience nothing, which is in itself good ; but will find, that as they refused to ask here, God will refuse to give for ever. All these sources of obligation lend their whole force to all the seasons, occasions, and kinds, of prayer ; to the public worship ofthe Sabbath, and of authorized fasts and festivals ; to the morn ing and evenipg sacrifice ; to the religious service at our meals ; , arid to the prayers, offered up on the nuraberless occasions, pre sented by our daily returning wants, sufferings, and enjoyments. On all these occasions, they are accordingly to be felt, acknowl edged, and obeyed. Of course, we afe to. remember, to feel, and willing'ly to feel, nay, to feel with delight and gratitude, that it is dur indispensable duty, our highest interest, and our glorious privilege, to pray always, with all prayer and supplication, with giv ing of thanks : for this is good and acceptable in the sight of God, our Sai>iour. Amen, SERMON CXL. THE ORPINARY MEANS OP GRACE. THE USEFULNESS OT PRAYER TO INDIVIDUALS. 1 Thessalonians V. 17. — Pray without ceasing '. ',>. " IN the preceding discourse, I considered the Nmture, and Sea sons, of Pray'er, and the Obligations which we are under to pray. I shall now discuss, at some length, the fourth subject,proposed at that tirae ; viz. the Usefulness qf Prayer. « The observations which I shall make concerning this subject, will be included under the following generalheads. : , The Usefulness of Prayer by its own proper Influence ; and. Its Efficacy in procurin^g Blessings of God, The first of these heads, viz. 7%'e Usefulness of Prayer by its own proper lufiuence, I shall consider, as it respects ij. Individuals ; ''¦'Families; and. Public Societies, In this discourse, it is my intention, to exhibit the Usefulness of Prayer to Individuals by its proper Infiuence. on themselves. Before I proceed to the direct discussion of this subject, it will be useful to observe, that the personal concerns of an individual are the proper subjects of secret prayer. The propriety of such Prayer is wholly derived from the fact, that we have many impor tant interests, which are only personal, and require to be transact ed between us and our Maker. In their very nature, they are in-. capable of being disclosed to our fellow-creatures, without material disadvantages. Often they are such, as we would not, on any account, reveal to any human being whatever. Often the dis closure, although not injurious to pur moral or intellectual charac ter, would wound our delicacy, or involve us in other kinds of distress. In a multitude of instances, where they are already partially known, we are still unable to disclose them entirely, and with that freedom, which is indispensable to the due performance of this duty. Before our Maker, strange as it may seem, we can use a freedom of communication, which cannot be exercised to wards any created being. We know, that he is already acquainted with whatever we have experienced, done, or suffered, either with in or without the mind. We know that he is infinitely removed from all the partialities, and prejudices, from all those cold, unkincij and contemptuous sentiments, which are so generally cherished by SEB. CXL.] THE USEFULNESS, ka, .. 97 our fellow-men. We knovv, that he will not betray us ; but, how ever unworthy we have been, will regard us, if sincere and jiehi- Icnt, with kindness and mercy. We ajiproach Him, therefore, with a freedom, a confidence, of communication, vvhich can be used to wards no other being in the Universe. Besides, God is nearer to all men, than any man to another. If we are willing to choose hira as our friend; he is infinitely the near est, the best, the most affectionate, of all friends. With Him, therefore, a communion can, and does, exist, vvhich no creature can hold with a fellow-creature. In consequence of these facts, a freedom, and a fervency also, exists in secret prayer, vvhen the subject of it is our personal con cerns, which cannot exist in the presence of others. With these things premised, 1 observe, that the Usefulness of Prayer to individuals is' found. First, In the pecuUar Solemnity zuhich il naturally induces, on the mind. In secret prayer, a man comes directly into the presence of God. This great and awful Being is the Source of all solemn thoughts and emotions in his creatures ; and the Object in which such thoughts ultimately terminate. Every thing in His Character, every thing in our character and circumstances, every thing in our relations to Him, and in the situation in vvhich vve are thys placed; the end, for which we have entered our closets ; the duty which we are performing ; the retirement from the vvorld ; the presence of God, and the consciousness that his eye is on our hearts ; all these conspire to drive away every trifling thought, and to banish every improper emotion. It is scarcely possible, that the man, who has withdrawn to his closet, for the purpose of meeting God face to face; and vvho here remembers before vvhom he stands, on what business he has come, and of what impor tance that business is to himself; should fail to fix his thoughts in soleranity and awe, arid hush every tendency to an unbecoming emotion. To all men, this state of mind is eminently useful, and indispen sably necessary. Spiritual and immortal concerns deraand, of course, and most obviously, this state of mind. We cannot at tend to them, in any other slate, with advantage; nor vvilhout se-- rious disadvantage. We cannot see them as ihey ^re, nor feci thera as they are. We cannot bc influenced- to attend to them,- nor to provide for them, as they indispensably demand. As they are of all possible conscquenca to us ; so this state of mind ; the only one, in which we can use'fully attend to them ; becomes of a proportional importance. Thus forgiveness of sin, a restoration to holiness, resolutions to perform our .duty, the efl'ectual pursuit of salvation, 'and the final escape from ruin, can never be useful objects of attention, and ef* fort, to him whose mind is not settled in that stale of solemriUv, Vol, IV. :¦ 3 98 THE USEFULNESS OF [SER. CXL. which these mighty concerns require. Tlie soul, which is given up to levity, regards them, of course, with habitual indifference ; and not unfrequently wilh habitual contempt. By a man of this character, therefore, they will be neglected and forgotten. Secondly. Prayer is useful to an individual, as it enlightens, and quickens, the conscience. Conscience is the Judgment of the Mind concerning its moral con duct, both internal and external. By this Judgment of the mind, we are, and of necessity raust be, ultiraately directed in every case of a raoral nature. It is, therefore, of the utraost importance, that it should be formed aright. Conscience, also, is used both in Scriptures and elsewhere, with a direct reference to those emotions, or feelings, zuhich we experience, zuhen this judgment is formed ; and which usually have more or less infiuence upon the formation of ihe judgment itself, and upon the conduct, by which it is followed. When these are just and vigor ous, we are not only directed, but prompted, to act aright. When they are dull and lifeless, we are apt, how just soever the judg ment may be, either not to act at all, or to act in direct violation of its dictates. In every such case, our conduct is sinful ; and often, when, under the influence of a conscience more tender and susceptible, it would have been virtuous. Hence the plain neces sity of having our consciences quickened, or made alive to our duty. A seared conscience denotes not the want of a capacity to judge, but an insensibility, to the importance of raoral good and evil. Araong the raeans, placed in our power, of enhghtening and quickening the conscience. Prayer, after the Scriptures, is, in my view, the first ; and far superior to any other. It is, also, the chief mean of rendering the Scriptures theraselves effectual to this end. When we stand in our closets, imraediately before God, are se cluded from the world, and withdrawn from every eye but his ; when we feel the awe, inspired by a clear view of his character, and realize in an affecting raanner his presence and inspection ; it can hardly be possible for us not to entertain, concerning our Cre ator, ourselves, and all raoral objects, views, exceedingly different from those gross apprehensions, which we experience in ordinary circumstances. We can hardly fail to discern our sinful charac ter, and to regard sin as a real and great evil. God, in spite of all our ordinary stupidity, will then appear to be- an awful, per fect, and glorious Being ; his Law to be holy, just, and good ; its extent to comprehend all our thoughts and actions alike ; its na ture, demands, and penalties to be unchangeable ; and ourselves to be condemned, and, if left in our present condition, to be ruin ed. In this situktion we further discern, of course, that many things are sinful, vvhich we have customarily regarded as innocent; and that many things are duties, to perform which, we have here- toT^e felt little or no obligation. SER. CXL.] PRAYER TO INDIVIDUALS. 99 These views are particularly enlarged, and rendered more dis tinct, by means of our confessions, and petitions. When we con fess our sins before God ; we are compelled to such a sincerity of thought, as well as of speech, as raust induoe us to throw aside a multitude of prejudices, self-justifications, and self-flatteries ; usu ally, and very pleasingly, cherished. , We know, that we cannot deceive God ; and are certain, that even our inmost thoughts are naked to the All-seeing eye. Little inducement is presented tp us, therefore, to think falsely of our conduct. So far as our views ex tend, they naturally becorae just, and scriptural. In this state, every sin, which we confess-, is apt to be seen as it is ; as a sin ; as a viola tion of the Law of God ; as an act of opposition to his Will ; and as a source to us of guilt and conderanation. The vanity strong ly appears of attempting to hide our guilt from his sight ; and of course, the necessity, as well as the duty, of acknowledging it be fore him. Hence, while the confession of all our sins is forcibly prompted, the confession of each is naturally rendered sincere. Hence, also, the sinner sees many things to be sinful, which he has usually thought innocent ; perhaps virtuous ; and the whole num ber of his sins to be far greater, than he has before mistrusted. In our Petitions, we ask for the blessing of God. If we ask for forgiveness, we ask for the forgiveness of our sins ; and of course discern, -that we have sins to be forgiven. This forgiveness is ne cessary for every sin. While the eye of the mind is employed in wandering with solemn anxiety over this interesting subject, and inquiring with deep solicitude what, and how numerous, are the cases, in which this forgiveness is needed ; it is impossible for us not to perceive, that, we have raany, very many, sins to be for given. If we ask for sanctification ; we ask it for sinners, to whom this blessing is necessary. - In the same character, we ask for jus tification, for adoption, for increase of grace, and for perseverance unto the end. In a word, our guilty character will recur, and pre sent itself before our eyes, with every petitipri which we make. Nor will the necessity, and excellence, of hohness appear with less evidence. Sin is our ruin : hohness is our recovery. Both are alike important : the one being as dreadful, as the other is de sirable. Of all the blessings, for which we ask, holiness is the basis, the means, and the end. To every one of them it insepa rably adheres: with every one it is intimately blended. Our views, therefore, will be as naturally, and as extensively, engaged by it; and be as, naturally rendered clear, and impressive. . As these two great attributes are the only ones, which character ize our moral conduct ; so the clearer and brighter pur views of these things are, the more enhghtened, of course, is our Con science, or the judgment of our minds concerning that conduct. When we ask God for his blessing on any thing, whicjh we are about to do, vve shall in this way discern with more certainty its 100 TtlE USEFULNESS OF [SER. CXL. real nature ; especially as it appears to our own view ; than in any other situation. We often, as we think, convince ourselves by reasoning, that a proposed pursuit is lawful and right ; when we in fact believe il to be otherwise. In most, if not all, such cases, the first judgment of our minds, that vvhich we usually denominate the decision of Conscience, has already determined it to be wrong. On the future reasoning, inclination has, usually, had no small share of influence ; and has warped the judgraent of the mind so, as to lead it to false conclusions. With these conclusions, how^- ever, we ai-e but too prone to feel satisfied. But, if we attempt to ask the blessing of God upon such conduct in our closets, we shall often find our attempts to be vain. Our mouths vvill be stopped, and our eftbrls to pray annihilated, Sorae persons declare, and appear to believe, that Gaming is lawful and justifia ble. But no one ever asked, no one can ever seriously ask, the blessing of God on a design lo garae. There are persons, who de clare Lewdness to be lawful. But no person can ask God to bless a lewd purpose. An attempt of this nature vvould choak the ut terance even of a profligate. When we ask the same blessing on sirailar conduct, already past ; the sarae consequences vvill follow ; and we shall be forced, in spite of ourselves, to acknowledge, and feel, the guilt of that, vvhich is sinful. Notwithstanding his utmost efforts, the sinner will be checked in all his attempts to pray, so long as he justifies, ' so long as he does not confess, and lament, his guilty conduct ; how ever satisfied with hiraself he was in the perpetration. Until he becoraes willing lo forsake his sins, they vvill hinder his prayers. Nor can he continue lo sin, and continue to pray. This doctrine St, Peter teaches in the third chapter of his first Epistle. In the 7lh verse, he directs husbands to live with their zuives, as in the preceding verses he had directed wives to live with their husbands, in the performance of all the duties of conju gal affection, and in a general obedience lo the precepts of the Gospel. For these directions, he subjoins his reason in the fol lowing words : that your prayers be not hindered. According to this decision of the Apostie, disobedience to the Gospel, and the neglect of the duties required by il, hinder, of course, the prayers of mankind. In other words. Sin is the direct hindrance of prayer. Every person, vvho prays lo God, will continually find, by his own experience, that this account of the subject is true ; and. that, when ever he sins, his .prayers are hindered. Of course, he will be obliged to relinquish his sins, or desist from his prayers. Should he continue to pray, all the views, which I have mentioned, and all others like thera, will continually recur ; and will soon become ha bitual. They will soon constitute the general current of his think ing on moral subjects. But the more clear, distinct, and habitual our thoughts concerning moral subjects become, the more stron|- ly, and th^ more uniformly, shall vve feel these subjects. Their SER. CXL.] PRAYER TO INDIVIDU.VLS. jOl importance will not only be seen, but regarded with much solem nity, deep interest, and influential concern. The soul, continuing in prayer without ceasing, becomes alive to aU such subjects. These are the chief subjects of its prayers ; and prayer is its chief duty. Moral subjects, therefore, resume their proper place, and rank, in its estimation ; and find a susceptibihty in its regard, whol ly due to them, and iraraensely interesting to itself. In l:his way, prayer contributes, to a degree which cannot be limited, to with draw the soul from sin ; lo disarm temptations of their fasci nating influence ; to weaken the power of passion ; and to in crease the hopes, and means, of resistance. In the same manner, are the views, and emotions, which regard holiness, improved ; and resolution, and strength, gained, to make progress in the Di vine life. Thirdly. Prayer is useful io unregeneraied individuals, by teach ing them, that, so long as they continue in this state, they cannot pray in the manner required by God, Unregenerate men, when affected with a deep sense of their guilt, and a solemn concern for their future destiny, universally pray. But all such men, before they have made attempts of this nature, believe, whatever may be their creed, that they can pray with their present disposition, so as at least to satisfy themselves ; and, not improbably, so as to be acceptable to God. There is no way, within ray knowledge, in which they so effectually unlearn this doctrine, and so entirely give up this belief, as by their own attempts at prayer. The pecuharly clear, distinct, and affecting views pf moral subjects, which I have already mentioned, are of course directed lo their prayers, as well, as rauch, and probably more, than lo any other subjects of this nature. Their prayers, in the act of oflfering thera up to God, are seen by them in a light, and with a distinctness and certainty, never, perhaps, experienced in any other case. Amid the anxiety and earnestness, with which awakened sinners pray, they come, without an exception, first to doubt their own ability lo pray as they ought ; and then, without a doubt, to believe, that their prayers are wholly destitute of evan gelical worth : at least, I never knew an exception to this process in any person, who, in this situation, has disclosed his views of the subject to me. Perhaps I ought rather to say, I remember none. This important part of self-knowledge is, 1 beheve, rarely, if at all, acquired in any other way. In this situation, and by these means, sinners, if I mistake not, are chiefly brought to a stale of absolute humiliation, and a full conviction of their entire dependence on Christ for holiness and Salvation. Not to be able to pray, so as to be in some degree satisfied, and comforted, by our prayers, is to be poor indeed. This humbled, dependent stale of the mind is, as I formerly observed, that, in which the Grace of the Gospel is usually bestowed on men. 102 THE USEFULNESS OF [SER. CXL. Fourthly. Prayer is useful to Individuals, as it teaches them their Dependence on God. The act of asking for blessings in Prayer, which is its primary employment, brings up forcibly to our view the impossibility of furnishing them to ourselves. The blessings also, for which we ask, are seen ,to be absolutely necessary for us, and such as none but God can give. They are the result of Infinite Power, Wis dom, and Goodness, alone. Of these Interesting truths, the sup pliant cannot fail to perceive the clearest evidence, and to experi ence the strongest impression. To this sense of dependence on God, our Adoration, in which we recite his glorious perfections in the most soleran manner ; our Confession, in which we recount our sins and wants, our infinite need of forgiveness, and our utter insufficiency to supply ourselves with the necessary good ;- and our Thanksgiving, in which we ac knowledge, that all the blessings, enjoyed by us, have corae from God only; irresistibly conspire to make large additions. As the God, whose immensely great and glorious Character we humbly and solemnly repeat, is presented to our view as rich in all good ; we feel ourselves to be poor, and little, and sinful, and naked, and in want of all things. Alone, withdrawn from the world, in the immediate presence of Jehovah, we cainnot but see these things in the strongest light, end, by themselves. The eye of the mind is turned solely, and in tensely, upon them, and prevented from the obscurity, confusion, and consequent perplexity, which necessarily attend all complicat ed views. With such apprehensionsj we can scarcely fail to feel, - in the deepest manner, this raost iraportant subject. It becomes the burden of our thoughts, and our language. The value of the blessings themselves, our indebtedness to God for them, our own unworthiness of them all, and the mercy, manifested in be stowing them, unitedly impress them on our hearts with a force pe culiar and pre-eminent. As the pardon of our sins, and the justification, adoption, and sanctification, ofour souls, constitute the raeans of all other good; so they are seen, felt, and acknowledged, even by the convinced sinner, to be his own, highest, and immediate" good. For this good, he will cry with intense earnestness to Him, in whom alone he finds either ability, or disposition, to communicate this inval uable blessing. With deep humiliation, with intense anguish, he casts hiraself at the foot of the cross, with the prayer of the publican, God be merciful to me a sinner ; or With that of the-dis- ¦feiples, when the ship, in which they were conveyed, was ready to sink ; Lord, save me, or I perish ! In this situation of the soul, desponding, convmced of its guilt and danger, and feeling the in; finite necessity of forgiveness and renovation, God, in all his or dinary Providenc(2, has been graciously pleased tp extend mercy to sinners, and to bring them into his Kingdom. This is not SER. CXL.] PRAYER TO INDIVIDUALS. IO5 done because of any excellency in their prayers, or in their char acters ; for no such excellency exists ; but because they infinitely need his mercy ; and also, if I am not deceiyed, because there is an evident propriety in bestowing it on them, when in this sit uation, rather than while they are stupid, blind, and hardened in their sins. The Christian, in the sarae manner, learns with still raore clear ness, and stronger affections, his own absolute dependence on his Maker. All his springs of hohness, and happiness, he perceives to be in God. Innuraerable sins he discovers lying at his door; many and various lusts reraaining in his heart ; wants of many kinds, and of great importance, rising up continually to his view j his guilt dreadfully-great, and his danger extreme. No being, but God, can remove the evils, from which he suffers, or those which he dreads. None, but God, can supply the blessings, which he feels to be his all. In the whole of the Christian course, he realizes, in the most af fecting manner, his absolute necessity of being enabled by the grace of God to resist temptations, to overcome lust, to vanquish enemies, to subdue sin, and to advance in obedience. Every evil affection he sees capable of being -removed, or lessened, by the assistance of God only : and by the same assistance he must be furnished with all his abihty to live a holy life, and to cultivate ev ery virtuous propensity. From God only, he also knows, raustbe derived his daily hope, support, and consolation ; peace of mind, evidence of the love of God, increase in grace, and a patient con tinuance in well-doing. God only can cleanse his soul, refine and exalt his views, remove his fears, quicken his affections, brighten his hopes, and multiply his joys. All these are blessings, possess ed by none beside the Infinite Mind ; and gifts of none but the Almighty Hand. ^ Al the same time, they are blessings, which God is supremely pleased to bestow. His nature is bounty; and giving is his favourite employraent. But he is pleased to be inquired of for all blessings. Ready as he is to bestow, it is his pleasure, that all his rational creatures should ask. Accordingly he requires a// ^«sA to come to him with their requests ; and, for their encouragement, styles himself a God hearing prayer, Wilh these delightful views of the Divine Char acter, and with affecting apprehensions of his own circumstances, every Christian comes to God ; and finds in prayer peculiar en couragement, hope, assistance, strength, enjoyment, and universal edification. Fifthly., Prayer is useful to Individuals, as it furnishes to them the best views of the Divine Character, Prayer brings home to the mind the Chii acter of God with pe culiar advantage in many ways. Sorae of these have been already mentioned ;*as being inseparably connected with the subjects, which I have had occasion to consider. Several others I shall 104 THE USEFULNESS OF [SEK. CXL, now briefly recount. It is impossible, that a suppliant should fail to remember, with peculiar strength and conviction, this Glorious Being as his Creator, Preserver, and Benefactor, his Father, Re deemer, and Sanctifier. These are themes of his prayer, in all the parts of it ; and are perpetually recurring. They rise in his adoration, confession, thanksgivings, and petitions. They rise in every profitable form. He cannot think of a, want, a sin, ora blessing, without reahzing against whom his sins have been com mitted, by whom his wants must be supplied, and from whom his blessings must flow. He cannot but recall wilh deep affection the justice of that great Being, whom he has offended ; the holiness ot Hira, whose image he is required to exhibit ; the purity of Him, whpse all-seeing eye is intent on his sins ; the power of Him, by whom he was created, and has been alway preserved ; and the goodness, faithfulness, truth, and mercy, of Him, to whose mercy, truth, and faithfulness, he must be indebted for the forgiveness of his sins, and the performance of all the proraises, contained in the Covenant of Grace, and to whose goodness he must owe every future blessing of time and eternity. In Prayer, God literally draws nigh to him, and he to God. In a sense, he beholds his character in full vievv; as we distinctly see near objects with the bodily eye.. The Divine Perfections are, therefore, realized, and acknowledged ; and not merely, and loosely, proved by argument to our understandings. Like Job, he .before had heard of God by the hearing of the ear ; but now his eye seeth him. As his prayers return daily; so his views, re turning vvith thera,' soon becorae habitual ; and, like other habitual things, become continually stronger and stronger, more and more bright, just, and affecting. The great, glorious, and delightful character, on which he sofrequently dwells, is in a sense instamped on his heart ; and always realized, and enjoyed. Thus a peace and satisfaction are derived to him from prayer, for which nothing can be a substitute. By prayer, therefore, as a Christian he lives ; and lives with holiness and wisdom,, daily increasing ; is continu ally a better man in all the relations of the present life, and a more and more proper candidate for immortal happiness in the world abpve. ' That each of the several things, which I have mentioned as ef fects flowing from the performance of this duty, is, in an eminent degree, useful to him who performs, it, will be questioned by no sober man. Still more strongly will it be perceived, that all these advantages, united, must be of pre-eminent importance. To be destitute of them must be, in the spiritual sense, to be poor, and wretched, and miserable. All of theip, however, exhibit this sub:- ject, when considered by themselves, in an iraperfect manner. These views, and dispositions, in their connexions and conse quences, are branched out into others ; and then into others'^still; in such numbers, in so continual a succession, and wilh such effi- SER. CXL.] PRAYER TO INDIVIDUALS. 105 cacious influence, as to affect with the greatest advantage the whole Christian cfciracter, and to reach through every part of the Chris tian life.- Every where, their influence is felt 3 and wherever it is felt, is benign and happy. Hence the Scriptures insist so abundantly on the performance of this duty ; and,, to secure their benevolent putpose, multiply, every where, commands, examples, arid promises. '4 ' ,•; REMARKS. From this summary and imperfect account of the Usefulness of Prayer to Individuals, I remark, 1. That he, who does not habitually pray to God, cannot be a Ch^^stian, , God has commanded us to pray to him ; and is pleased to be in quired of hy'^is creatures for all the good which they need. ¦ He, who does not pray, violates coritinually a plain command of the Scriptures ; and proves himself indifferent to the gr^at and com prehensive duty Of obeying his Maker. But this is a contradiction to the whole Christian character. This, however, is not the only ground of the conclusion ; nor that, ,6n which I meant principally to insist at the present time. Iri the character, and circumstances, of a Christian, is laid the most solid foundation of habitual prayer. His sins perpetually present to him the infinite necessity of forgiveness and sanctification. His love to God, andhis good- will to mankind, excite in hira, by their Very nature, unceasing desires, and generate vigorous efforts, to increase this Evangelical character. His faith in Christ, and his disposition to obey his commands, require continual additipns of strength ; and the peculiar consolation, peace, and hope, which he finds in pray^ er, and wluch without prayer, he cannot find, caH unceasingly upon him to be faithful, steadfast, and fervent, in this duty^ A hungry man might as well be expected to abstain from food ; or a thirsty man from drink ; as a Christian from prayer. Prayer is the breath on which Christianity lives^; and from which if derives peculiarly its power, activity, and enjoyment. Mark the manner, in which flavid describes his distress in being cut, off frbm the solemn ser vices of the tabernacle ; and the relief, the comfort, the strength, and the joy, which he found when he drew nigh to that holy place. Mark the discourses of our Saviour on this -subject ; and the most edifying example of performing this duty, which he has left on record for our imitation. Attend diligently to the commands, exhortations, and' encouragements, given by St^ Paul, to engage uslo continue always in all pray ert Here you will see With the' most certain evidence how naturally, and how irresistibly, holi ness prompts to the performanpe of this duty. Such is the spirit, by which all Christians are gpverned, and without which no man can be a. Christian. By our l*ruits arewe- known both to ourselves and to others. Prayer is the prominent fruit of the Christian spirit; Vol. IV. 14 106 THE USEFULNESS OF [SER. CXL. and, where this fruit is not foiyid, it will be in vain to search for the tree. . ' '. ' ' ", From these observations we easily learn the reason, why hypo crites rarely continue steadfast fo^ any length of time in secret prs^yer. A sinner, under strong, convictions of sin, will betafee hiqiself of course to his closet. Why will he do this ? He is still a sinner, and a stranger to the Evangelical character. . He finds no part of the Christian's pleasure in things divine ; in obedience to God, or the contemplation of his perfections, commands, or designs ; in his Sabbath, Word, or Ordinanpes. Of that relish for spiritual objects, which is implanted in Regeneration, and which constitutes what is called the spiritual mind, he is wholly destitute. In seeking salvation, however, he is altogether in earnest ; and in seeking the forgiveness of hjs sins, and the sanc tification of his heart, as indispensable means of this most inter esting, attainment. Hence he prays. But to this character the hypocrite is -a stranger ; and feels not, therefore, these induce ments to prayer. Still more is he a stranger to the views, affectipps,- aj[id enjoy- iDients, of a Christian. For spiritual objects he has no rehsh, no desire. In the character of God, the character of Christ, and the nature of religion, he finds no pleasure, and sees no profit ; except so far as hypocrisy may increase his reputation, and promote his selfish purposes.. For this, his governing end, he will often appear more engaged in religipn, when he expects to be seen by men, than Christians themselves. In public and family prayer he will frequently be, exact and abundant ; because this conduct will gain him the character, which he covets. Here others see him. Here, therefore, he finds an advantage, sufficient to excite bis persever ance in these external services. , But in secret prayer there can be no gain, beside that which is spiritual and immortal. No reputation can spring from tonductj unknown to men. If, therefore, the hypocrite begins the perform ance of this duty ; he will usually soon desist ; because on the one hand-, he has no anxiety about salvation, and on> the other, no de light in the duty. Accordingly, Job says of the hypocrite. Will he delight himself in the Almighty ? Will he always call upon God? that is, he will not always call upon God. He will, at times, call upon God for a little period; but wiU cease, of course, from^ this duty, after that period is ended ; because he expects from it neither profit nor pleasure. 2. From these observations it 'is evident also, that he who does not pray., is guilty of pre-eminent folly. , , Prayer is the only communication between mankind and their Maker, and the only means of obtaining blessings from Hini. The man who refuses, or neglects, to pray, voluntarily cuts himself off, tberefore, from all hope of good. The easiest, least expensive, least burdensome, J)ossible mode of acquiring good, is to ask for it. SER. CXL.] PRAYER TO INDIVIDUALS. 107 God has been pleased to constitute this the only mode of obtaining it from Him. He therefore, who does not pray, cannot rationally hope for any blessing. To renounce all good, when it is attainable by any means, how ever difficult, is the conduct of a fool. To renounce it, when the means are the easiest possible, is the conduct of a madman. Such a fool, such a madman, is he, who neglects prayer. To pray, costs 'neither money, pains, nor time. Why do multitudes in this house neglect to pray ? The true explanation of this myste rious, sottish vioiation of every dictate of reason, conscience, and Revelation, is, that all these persons hate their duty. They sin against God, and wrong their own souls ; they hate him, and love death. SERMON CXLI. THE ORDINARY MEANS OF GRACE. THE USEFULNESS OP PRAYER TO FAMILIES. Ephesians vi. 10. — Prayin^always with all Prayer. Having considered the Usefulness of Prayer to Indi'viduals, I shall now, according to the scheme proposed, examine its IJse- fulness to Families. The Text, as will be seen by attending to its connexion with the; preceding verse, contains a coraraand, in which we are re quired to pray always, ev ifavri toi xougui, at every season, with all prayer; that is, with prayer of every kind ; or prayer offered up to God in every form. By this precept, then, mankind are com manded to pray at every season, suited to the performance of this duty ; and with such prayer, as becomes the circumstances, wants, and characters, of those, by whom the duty is to be per- forihed. That Family prayer is included in this general direction, as one kind of prayer especially Suited to the wants and circumstances of mankind, will not be questioned by most of those who profess the religion of the Gospel. Nor will it be doubted, that every morn ing, and every evening, presents a proper season for the perform ance of this religious service. In examining the proposed subject of discourse, it will be use ful to consider. The Advantages of performing. The Disadvantages of neglecting, and. The Objections, commonly made against, this duty. The foundation of Family prayer is laid in the intimate connex ion of those, who are members of these little societies. This con nexion necessarily creates a variety of interests, wants, enjoy ments, and sufferings, which are common to them all. United in all these concerns in a very intiraate manner, the several mem bers of a family find a common interest in unitedly supplicating upon. them the blessing of God, without which neither prosperity nor relief can be expected. A comraon interest is the source of all communion in the worship of Gpd, whether in families, par ticular chuirches, nations, or the Christian world at large. Nor is there any reason against family worship, which does not lie against the worship of churches, and larger Christian communities. Indeed, ancient churches were not unfrequently formed of single famihes. SER. CXLI.] THE USEiULNESS &.C. • 109 Among the Advantages, which attend Family prayer, I shall mention tbe following. , 1. The intimate communion, which exists in this worship, natural ly renders our devotion intense, and exalted. Religion is in its nature social. Worship, particularly, is natural ly social. Every man, possessed of the spirit of the Gospel, feels an interest in those things, in which others are alike interested with him, which it is difficult for him to feel in things, even of the same nature, which concern himself only. Nay, selfish as the human heart is, mankind are naturally more affected, on mariy oc casions, by those concerns in which they share with others,' than in those which are merely personal. He, who would fly, when himself only was attacked, would fight, when an eneray assaulted his family. Many a slothful man has become industrious, many a firodigal prudent, many a "parsimonious raan generous, and many a ight-minded man sober, in consequence of the interest which he took in the affafrs of his household. All the members of a family are connected by the strong bonds of natural affection : bonds, which unite human beings together with a power, and intimacy, found in no other circumstances of life. The syriipathy, here experienced, is therefore intense, and peculiar. The wants, and interests, are not only common, but near and important ; reaching every heart at once, awakening in stinctively a lively, vigorous concern, a powerful sympathy, and united efforts, of singular energy and ardour. The members of a family all dwell, -also, in the same house ; are daily united in one common system of employments ; interchange unceasingly, and habitually, their kind offices ; and are accustomed to rejoice and mourn, to hope and fear, to Weep and smile, together. No elo quence, no labour, no time, is necessary to awaken these sympa thetic emotions.. They are caught at once from eye to eye, and from heart to heart ; and spread, instantaneously, with an electric influence. through all the endeared and happy circle. In the devotions of this little asserably, parents pray for ' their children, and children for their parents ; the husband for his wife, and the wife for her husband ; while brothers and sisters send up their requests to the throne of Infinite Mercy, to call down bless ings upon each other. Who, that wears the name of man, can be indifferent here ? Must not the venerable character of the parents,. the peculiar tenderness ofthe conjugal union, the affectionate inti macy of the filial and fraternal relations ; must not the nearness of relations long existing, the interchange of kindriess long contintied, arid the oneness of interests long- cemented ; all warm the iieart, heighten the importance of every petition, and increase the fervour of every d'evotiona} effort ? The blessings, asked for, are comraon to all. The parent, in speaking,for one member of the family, speaks, even when he does not directly design it, for every one. For here, as in the natural 110 THE USEFULNESS OF [SER. CXLL body, whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it ; or one memoer he honoured, all the members rejoice zuith it. ¦ These blessings are also indispensable, and invaluable. They are no other than the health, union, peacp, prosperity, forgiveness, sancti fication, and everlasting life, of all this circle of beloved objects. How necessarily, then, must all the natural affections ofthe heart, and all the power of religion, conspire tp render prayer, thus of fered up, eminently fervent and devout ! The world, perhaps, does not furnish a single prospect so beautiful, so-lovely, to the eye of vir tuous contemplation, as a Family, thus assembled in the morning for their affectionatedevotions; corabiningthe; two raostc%rming among all the exercises of the human heart, piety to God, their common Parent, and tenderness to each other ; and living through t-he day in that course of Evangelical conduct, which is pre-eminently suited to so delightful a beginning. No priest, no minister, is so venerable, as a father ; no congregation so dear and tenderly be loved, as a wife and children ; and no oblations are offered with the same union, interest, and delight, as those of a pious and affec tionate household. 2. Family prayer eniinently contributes to domestic Order and Regularity. The worshijp of the morning, and of the evening, commences and closes the concerns of the day with an exactness of method, almost necessarily diffused through all its concerns. The regular returns of an employment, distinguished by its importance, com municate to the business connected with it, and to those who per form it, a character of regularity, unavoidably felt, and universal ly prevailing. The worship of God is always of the highest im portance. The spirit of religipn, which dictates it, is in its na ture, a spirit of order. Its returns take place^ every morning, and every evening, after short intervals, and with exact regularity. Its influence is, therefore, necessarily diffused through the day ; operates with an efficacy wholly peculiar ; and controls with a su- pepor authority both the mind and the life. No influence is equal ly felt : and no minds are equally prepared to be acted upon by influience. The methpd established is invested wilh unrivalled soleranity, enforced by the sanctity of religion, ^regarded vvith sin gular veneration, and submitted to without a. questiony even in thoughti But method Js the soul of all business ; especially of complicated business ; and peculiarly of business, in which num bers are concerned. The method, here produc,ed, is formed with perfeqt regularity, with supreme ease, without the consciousness of any difficulty, and without a thought of any resistance. Its na ture is delightful : its efficacy is cpmplete. 3. Family worship greatly strengthens Parental Government. In the morning and evening devotion, the parent is invested' vvith the solemn character of a Priest of God; a Minister of Christ. This character, eminently venerable in itself, adds in the highest. SER. CXLI.] PR.4.YER TO FAMILIES. 1 1 1 degree,^ to, the. personal venerableness and dignity of the parent. When we think of any object, whatever may be its nature, we ne cessarily associate with it those ideas, which have customarily been coifnected with it in our rainds. Children naturally regard a parent with reverence. But they cannot fail to reverence a re spectable parent more, and a . contemptible parent less, on ac count ojf his perspnal character. Whenever they have been ac customed to behold their parent daily sustaining the office of a Minister of God ; they necessarily associate with every idea, which they form for his per^n and character, this solemn and important apprehension. Every image of this venerable relation, presented to their minds, wiU include in it that of a divinely appointed guardian of their spiritual concerns ; a-guide to their duty, given them from above ; a venerated and beloved intercessor for their salvation. At tbe same time, the apparent habitual piety, thus exhibited, will persuade the .children, that the authors of their being are sin cere in^U th'eir religious professions, and in their various moral insfructions to them; and that they are, therefore, in the Evangeh cal sense, virtuous. The evidence, furnished in this manner, may be, I acknowledge, and often is, overthrown by the sinful conduct even of praying parents. But I see not how this conviction can exist, where parents do not maintain the vvorship of God in their families. The want of such worship presents to the eye of chil dren a palpable, and indubitable, inconsistency between their don- duct, and their professions, which no child can fail to see, or feel. An. unhappy conviction will here unavoidably spring up in their minds, which cannot be stifled ; and which will necessarily lessen the character of the parent, and the weight Of his commands : a conviction, that these persons, notwithstanding their venerable name, and their relation tp himself, are unpossessed of that single ness of heart, and that integrity of profession, which he cannot avoid regarding as indispensable. This union in their worship presents, also, in a very forcible mariner, to the eyes of their offspring, that peculiar union of views, and affections, of interests, arid designs, with respect to the most important of all subjects, and by necessary corisequence with re spect to every other, without which, it is hardly necessary to ob serve, no parental government can be successful ; and the happy influence of which is proverbially acknowledged, wherever it is fpund. -, Itis,unnecessary to insist, here, upon the interesting nature of these subjects. It is unnecessary to show hOw indispensable it is, that children should entertain the most reverential thoughts con cerning their parents ; feel an undoubting conviction of their sin cerity in all things ; and reahze, in the strongest manner, their cor« dial unionin every valuable purpose. I shall only add, therefore, that, from the numerous coniplaints, so often made by parents con- 112 THE USEFULNESS OF [SER. CXLL cerning the difficulty of governing their children, it may fafrly bc inferred, that all persons, sustaining this character, and possessed of common understanding, must consider so efficacious an addition to their authority as of inestimable value. 4. This worship, in an eminent degree^ preserves, and promotes ^ Religion in a family. Whenever a family, or an individual, observes an exact r^egu- larity in performing the duties, and celebrating the ordinances, of the Gospel ; religion naturally becomes flourishing and .vigorous in their hearts, apd in their lives. Frora faraily prayers both the parents and their offspring go, happily prepared, to the devotions of the closet ; and from these devotions return, with the same be coming spirit, to the worship of the house : and from- the retired and affectionate services of the week, they proceed, with the best preparation, to the more solemn duties of the Sanctuary. To children, and servants, especially, the worship of the house is of incalculable importance. The advantages of both these classes of mankind for understanding, and practising, the duties of religion, in -many respects, are obviously few and limited: while their minds are imperfectly fitted to make the most advantageous use of such as they enjoy. To increase their number, arid their power, and certainly not to lessen either, must naturally be the wish, of every benevolent man. Among these, the household worship is eminently important. Here, so soon as they are able to understand any thing, they see religion appearing, daily, in one of its most affectifag forms ;~ celebrated by those, whom nature teaches them most to respect and love ; and occupied about inte rests, which they easily understand, and deeply feel. Under the happy influence of these considerations they grow, speedily, into fixed habits of thinking reverentially, and believing favourably, concerning religion. The very aspect of the service teaches them, that it holds the uppermost place iti the mind of the parent : while a conviction of this truth renders his opinions and conduct more venerable and affecting in those of tbe children. In these cir cumstances they, naturally feel, as if God was always to be: wor shipped, sought, honoured, and praised ; and that his blessing was to be implored in every concern, temporal and spiritual. A family, habituated in this manner, goes from the house, to the Church with the most profitable apprehensions concerning tbe orr dinanees of the Sabbath. Rehgion, in the view of all its mem bers, wears a soleranity and iraportance, ordinarily not otherwise attainable ; and a frame of niirid is acquired, most happily suscep tible of the best impressions in the house of God. Thus by, prayer in the family, the religion of its, members, if they are religious at all,-is rendered more sincere, fervent, and ef ficacious. They are all better beings ; better- 'husbands and wives; better fathers and mothers ; better children, brothers, and sisters ; better masters and servants ; than they otherwise wduld^ SER. CXLI.] PRAYEK TO FAAULIES. Ij3 or in the ordinary course of providence could, be. All the en dearing interests of famihes ; all the strong ties, the tender rela tions and the vigorous affections, which grow out of this happy ' union of mankind in these little societies of nature, are in this manner converted into mo^t useful means of promoting the holi ness of all. At the same time, and from the same source, children and ser vants are furnished with the most powerful persuasives to become holy. Family worship is a primary bBanch of religious education: as that education is a primary source of religion lo mankind ; and one of the two great pillars, on which rests the salvation of men. Without family worship, religious education will always be essen tially defective ; and the instructions, reproofs, and persuasives, suspected at least, if not accounted insincere. But holiness is the great interest of all rational beings. In it self it is happiness of the noblest kind. It is also the parent of all other happiness, which is solid and enduring. On family prayer, then, God has founded a great and important part of all the real good of his rational creatures in the prfesent world. No man can be insensible to this consideration, who is riot in sensible both to the present and future welfare of his offspring. Almost all parents wish their children to be virtuous here, and happy hereafter ; and this, even when themselves are vicious. Family prayer is one of the chief means among those, which are placed in the hands of parents, of rendering their children the subjects of holiness, and the heirs of eternal life. The parent, therefore, who does not make the utmost use of this mean, always in his power, so easily employed, so obviously fitted to produce the effect, and so fraught with invaluable consequences, ought never to pretend, that he has any real love for his children. When, therefore, he sees them sinful, thoughtless, and disso lute ; let him, instead of coraplaining of, the difficulty, which he finds in governing and reforming his children : instead of quieting himself with the belief, that they are so peculiarly froward as to frustrate every effort, and discourage every hope : take shame and confusion of face to himself for his own guilty negligence. Let hira reraember, that himself is eminently the cause of their profii- gacy, and thefr ruin. _ Let him tremble, lest ihe fury invoked by Jeremiahupon the families, which, called not upon the name of God, should descend upon his own house, as the proper reward of his own irreligion. 5. Families have' the best reason to expect the Blessings of God in answer to their prayers. All the promises, and other encouragements, given in the Scrip tures to prayer, are addressed to individuals, families, and larger communities, alike. The effectual fervent prayer of the righteous as fruly availeth much in the household, as in the closet or the Church. The house is the place to ask for family blessings.. Here Vol, IV, 15 114 THE USEFULNESS OF [SER. CXLI. all, concerned in them, unite their humble and fervent requests for the merciful communication. Nations warrantably hope for national blessings, when they join in public supplications lo God. The same observation is equally applicable to all inferior societies among mankind. The raerabers of a household are here the persons interested ; the persons who hope to receive ; and, therefore, the persons who should ask. They are unitedly to receive : their sup plications, therefore, ought to be'united. Nor is there any case, in which a gracious answer lo prayer may more justly be expected. Among the Disadvantages, which fiow from the neglect of family prayer, may be mentioned its unhappy Infiuence. 1. On Domestic Order. ' The mind naturally opposes order ; and cannot be brought to observe, or relish it, unless by infiuence long exerted, arguments oftpn repeated, and habits slowly and firmly established. Where these advantages do not exist in sorae good degree, man more re sembles a wild beast, than a rational being ; is impatient of all regularity; and all restraint; and is precluded, alike, from all worth, Usefiilness, and enjoyment. But no raeans contribute so easily, so powerfully, or so happily, to the establishment of good order in the house, as family worship. I do not deny, that this benefit flows in various degrees, from other sources. But even these are prevented of no small part of their influence, where this species of prayer is neglected. They are pillars, standing on one side of the building ; and incapable of supporting il, because those on the other side are taken away. 2. On Parental Government. By this neglect, all the advantages, already mentioned wilh reference lo this subject, are lost ; and all the disadvantages, de rived frorii the opposite conduct, are incurred. An irreligious parent cannot fail to be seen by children jn an unhappy light. Nor is this any fault in them. The most dutiful children will regard him In this manner. Irreligion is in its nature odious, and contemptible ; and cannot, unless under-the influence of strong habitual prejudice, fail lo be seen as- it is. Tbe conscience of every child will tell him this truth ; however affectionate, and reverential, may be his dispbsition. But the parent who is thus viewed by his children, and who gives them reason to view hira thus, will find his instructions, reproofs, and punishments, stripped of their principal efficacy. This efficacy is chiefly dependent on the reverence, with which he is regarded : and this reverence, in a higher degree than he will probably be aware, is inseparably dependent on their apprehension; that he is arehgious man. But the oraission of family worship will necessa rily attach to his character, always in some degree, ^nd usually not in a small one, the appearance of irreligion. Even in the most amiable, and in other repects unblameable, men, it will pre- rent that full conviction, in the minds of children, of parental re- SER. CXLI.] PRAYER TO FAMILIES. 115 spectability, which it is so desirable, that they should entertain. Even this fact will have a considerable, and malignant, influence upon the government, and obedience, of children. 3. On the Religion of a family. In a family, where such worship does not exist, there is, it must be acknowledged, no appearance of religion. If the parent, a case which rarely happens, should be a religious man ; he is not seen to possess t]&is character. Should he appear to sustain it in some things ; he is plainly discerned not to sustain it in others ; and thus exhibits an inconsistent, vibratory course of life, on which the eye cannot rest wilh either conviction, or pleasure. Such a con tradictory character can have little influence in doing good to thc minds of children. Whatever desfrable efficacy it may possess, when viewed on one side ; it will impair, and destroy, when seen on the other. All professions of Religion, all pretensions to being religious, pass for nothing in the minds even of children, when unsupported by a religious hfe. But, in the present case, the children behold their parent live in the continual neglect of what their consciences naturally declare to be one of the first duties of religion. Hence, whatever regard he may testify to this sacred subject ; how nu merous, and how solemn soever his instructions lb them may be ; his power of making useful impressions on their minds, will in a great measure be prevented. Let it be reraerabered, that this pre vention' will be voluntary and wanton. No necessity can be pleaded for it ; no advantage alleged ; and no excuse found. How solemn ly ought parents, who thus causelessly strip themselves, and rob their families, of these inestimable benefits, to ponder this unhap py course, and to give themselves neither rest, nor peace, until they shall have begun a final reformation ! The Objections, which, within my knowledge, have been alleged against Family prayer, or rather vvhich have been intended to ex cuse the neglect of this duty, are chiefly the following. I. The want of an Express injunction ofit in the Scriptures. There is not, I acknowledge, any passage in the Word of God, which, in so many terms, enjoins prayer in a family as a duty, in distinction from other modes of religious worship. Of him who thinks this fact an objection to the performance of this duty, I ask. Will you neglect every Christian duty, which you do not find en joined in express terms ? Are you prepa.red to go through life with out dedicating your children to God in Baptism ? Will you refuse td observe the ffrst day of the week as the Christian Sabbath ? Do you feel authorized to exclude the female sex from commuriion at the table of Christ ? Yet in vain would you look for precepts, en joining these things in express terras. But I deny the inference, drawn by the objector from the silence of the Scriptures concerning this subject. Not only is the gener al principle, that nothing is our duty, which is not expressly requir- 116 THE USEFULISESS OF [SER. CXLL ed in the Scriptures, false ; but the application of it, also, even if it were allowed to be true, is, in the present case, incapable of be ing justified. As the objection itself seems to be generally relied on more than any other ; it will be useful to consider the subject of it, at length, as it is exhibited in the Scriptures. ' Prayer is no where in the Scriptures enjoined as a duty, which was before unknown, dnd new, at the time of ihe injuvfition ; or as then to be begun. On the contrary, it is always spoken of as a duty, already known, confessed, and practised. All the com mands concerning il, respect either the times, manner, degree, spirit, universality, or some other circumstance, with which the performance ought lo be connected. In no instance is the duty enjoined as original ; or as the subject of a new institution. The first mention made of this subject in the Scriptures, if we adopt the coramon translation, is in Gen. iv. 26. Here, after the birth of Enos, it is said, that then began men to call on the name of theLord; that is, mankind then began publicly to worship God in a solemn, rehgious assembly. I suppose, however, that this translation is erroneous ; and believe the words ought to be ren dered, then began men lobe called aft^r the name of theLord: that is, the family of Seth began to be called the Sons qf God; in op position to the apostate family of Cain, who were styled the chil dren of Men. See Gen. vi. 2. According lo this opinion, the first passage, in which prayer is mentioned, is the prayer of ./^ira^am for /sAmae^. Gen. xvii. 13. The second is his intercession for Sodom. Gen. xviii. 24. The, third is the direction that Abraham should pray for .4&me- lech, after his offence in taking away Sarah. This may be con sidered as a command. The fourth is the declaration, ihat Isaac went out into the field to pray in the evening. Gen. xxiv. 63. To these may be subjoined, as next in order of time, several instances in the book of Job. Yea, thou restrainest prayer before God. Job xv. 4. My prayer is pure. Job xvi. 1 7. What profit shall we have, if we pray to him ? Words of the wicked. Job xvi. 15. He shall pray to God, and he will be .favourable to him. Job xxxiii. 26. , , , My servant Joh shall prciy for you : A command. Job xlii. 8. The first passage, which can be fairly construed as an injunction of prayer in the general sense, is the exhortation of the Psalmist, Pray for the peace of Jerusalem : that is, the Church at large. Ps. cxxii. 6. The second is in Jer. xxix. 7 : Seek the peace of the city whither Ihave caused you to be carried away captives, and pray unto the Lord for it. SER. CXLI.] rR.\YER TO FAMILIES. Hy In all these passages, (the whole number of those, in vvhich the subject is mentioned, until after the period of the last, which has been quoted) there are four instances in vvhich prayer may be said to be commandid. In the two, first, individuals are required to pray for individuals, on single and peculiar occasions. In the third. Saints are conimanded, or rather exhorted, when assembled for pubhc worship, to pray for the peace of the Church. In the fourth, prayer is enjoined upon the Jewish captives, for the peace ofthe city, whither they were tp be carried. All the other passages are merely circumstantial accounts of the subject. The first injunction of this duty, the terms of which regftrd it as in any sense generally obligato^ry, were given when the world was about three thousand years old; and the Jewish Church about eight hundred, Tlie second, about two hundred years afterwards. From these facts I conclude, that it was not the intention pf the Scriptures to institute this duty, anew, in any passage whatever : there being no passage in which it is thus instituted. They took up this subject in the only vvay which was natural, or proper. Men had always prayed from the beginning ; and on all occasions confessed prayer to be a duly. Nothing more, therefore, was necessary, natural, or proper, than to regulate it as a duty already begun, acknowledged, and practised by piankind. The state of facts demanded only that the Scriptures should teach the manner, the times, the spirit, the constancy, and the universality, of prayer. Nothing more was necessary : and this is done in the happiest, and most effectual, manner conceivable. • From this account of the raanner, in which prayeris treated in the Scriptures, it appears evident, at least to me, that original, and particular, directions concerning the three divisions of this duty, customarily made in modern times, viz. secret, family, and pw6& prayer, ought never to have been expected. The circum stances, in which the subject is taken up, and the manner in which it is exhibited, forbid every expectation of this nature. The ques tion, whether prayer in secret, in the family, or in public, is a duty of man, was probably never asked, nor the obligation to perform it in either case doubted, during the whole peripd, from the begin ning of the world to the completion of the Scriptural Canon. Men always prayed on every splemn and proper occasion ; in public, in private, and in secret. When one man had wants of his own, which he wished to spread before God ; or blessings, which he wished to ask ; he performed this duty in secret. When tvvo, twenty, a hundred, or a thousand, had common wants, and wished for common blessings; they united in their devotions; and thus formed a greater, or smaller religious assembly. Thus families, thus Churches, and thus nations, met together fpr social prayer and praise, as well as for the purpose of offering social sacrifices. 118 TilE USEFULNESS OF [SER. CXU. To this origin are to be referred the family sacrifices of Elkanah and Jesse ; and, among the heathen nations, the existence of house hold gods, and domestic libations. Such gods, derived from the same source, were in all probability the Teraphim, which Rachel took from Laban, Abraham'' s family plainly worshipped together : so did the faraily of Job : so did Christ and his Apostles : so did the Apostles afler his ascension. There were little rehgious as semblies, also, in the houses of Aquila,and of Nymphas ; consisting, probably; of their own households, and of such others as were occasionally present. The whole congregation of Israel, also, as sembled at the times, specified in the law of Moses, from the days of that lawgiver to the latest period of their national existence. In the same raanner, worshipped the Christian Churches at Jerusalem, Antioch, Rome, and other places. The truth unquestionably is ; prayer was instituted by divine appointment from the creation of man ; and was traditionarily spread through all nations, as a duly, evident to comraon sense, and acknowledged by the universal voice of mankind. The Gen tiles practised it in every form, as did the Patriarchs, Jews, and Christians, It was performed by one, few, or many :¦ that is, by all, who were interested in the wants felt, and the blessings sup plicated ; and secretly, privately, or publicly, just ajs the occasion required. On this scheme is the text forraed : Pray always zoith all prayer : that is, pray on every proper occasion, wilh prayer, suited to that occasion : if the occasion be your own, with the prayer suited to it; viz, secret prayer: if your own and that of others, also, be they few or many ; with prayer suited lo every such occasion. Families are always together at least twice every day ; and every day furnishes at least two occasions to all the members for communion in prayer. All the raembers, therefore, are required by this precept unitedly lo spread their comraon wants before their Maker, and to ask for- blessings in which they have a coramon interest. In the sarae raanner, are both secret and public prayer enjoined. Neither of these duties is enjoined originally. All the precepts, relating to thera, are employed in regulating the disposition with which, the manner in which, the tiraes at which, they are to be performed ; or the modification, or other eircumstances pertaining tP the performance. Neither of these duties is any where in the Scriptures instituted anew ; but both are always spoken of as al ready existing. At the same time, several passages of Scripture, beside those already raentioned, refer to this subject, in a raanner too evident to leave a reasonable doubt, that family wprship was their immediate object. When Joshua informs the children of Israel, that as for him andhis house, ihey zuill serve the Lord; he teaches us directly, that they united, and had customarily united, in this service. The SER. CXLI.] PRAYER TO FAMILIES. Hg Lordh Prayer, after the manner of which we are directed by Christ to pray, is a social prayer ; and seems plainly to have been intended, not for an individual, not for the closet, not for the Church ; but for the Faraily and the fireside. In this prayer we are directed to ask for our daily bread, on the day in which the prayer is used. As, therefore, we need, and are bound to ask for, our daily bread, every day, it was plainly designed to be a daily prayer ; and could not, therefore, be intended for the Church : since mankind are not, and cannot be, present in the Church eve ry day. That it was not intended for the closet is obvious from the fact, that it is addressed to God by more persons than one. That it may wilh propriety be used both in the Church, and in the closet, as lo its substance, I readily acknowledge : but it was, I think, plainly intended principally for the household. " What a live coal," says Dr, Hunter, beautifully, " is applied to devotion, when the solitary my Father and my God, is changed into the so cial our Father, and our God !" How delightful, let me add, how interesting, how animating, how encouraging, to every amiable and virtuous emotion, for the pair, thus united, to be able to say, and actually to say, " Behold here are we, and the children whom thou hast given us!" In Zechariah x. 10, -the prophet informs us, that, as a com mencement of the Millennial glory and happiness, the people of Israel shall worship God with peculiar earnestness and devotion, as it is expressed in the Hehrew, families by families. In other words he teaches us, that there shall be a wonderful prevalence of family worship. This, also, he exhibits . as followed by re markable testimonies of the divine favour, and as crowned with blessings, new in their degree, and eminently glorious in their na ture. It is difficult to conceive how God could testify in a raore affecting manner the peculiar favour, with which he regards family religion. 2. Diffidence and Timidity are often alleged as serious objections to the performance of this duly. This certainly is a very unhappy excuse for neglecting this duly, and very unfortunately alleged. I should feel myself bound to ask the aulhor of it, "Are you too diffident to perform your cus tomary business? Are you too diffident to pursue customary amusements ? Are you too diffident to commit sin ? Does the bashfulness, which hinders you from family prayer, hinder you also from censuring, and laughing at, others who practise it ? Does it prevent you from using the language of profaneness 1 Why should you be timid, only concerning the duties of religion ? Is there any thing in the nature of this subject, which can reasonably ex cite shame, or which can fairly excuse you in indulging it ? Is it not true, that rehgion itself is the thing, of which you are ashamed?" Remember, I beseech you, the awful declaration of Christ con cerning this subject. Whosoever shall he ashamed of me, and of 120 THE USEFULNESS OF [SER. CXLI. my words, of him shall the Son of Man be ashamed, when he shall come in Ms glory. Family worship, presented in the name of Christ, is as real a confession of this divine person, as the partici pation of the Sacramental Supper. 3. Inability to pray, to devise proper thoughts, and to find proper expressions, is also no unfrequent objection against the performance of this duty. ': To him, who alleges it, I would say, " Have you not wants to be supplied, woes, to be relieved, sins to be forgiven, and bless ings to be supphcated ? Can you not confess your sins, recite your wants, and distresses, and mention the blessings which you need? Do you ordinarily find any difficulty in conferring wilh an earthly friend, or in soliciting aid from an earthly benefactor ? Have you, when in earnest, ever found any serious embarrassment in telling others what you needed,-or what you desired ?" Wherever Religion gains possession of the heart, regular expe rience proves, that all these difficulties vanish. Nay, where se rious conviction of guilt and danger is entertained by the mind, every man, who is the subject of it, forgets at once both his ina bility and bashfulness. Is it not evident, then, that the true rea son, why these things have such unhappy influence over you, is, that you have no proper regard for rehgion, and no just sense eiiher of your guilt, or your need of forgiveness ? At the sarae time, these difficulties are incomparably more for midable in prospect, than in reality. As you approach them, they vanish. Thousands and millions, originally neither wiser npr bet ter than you, neither less timid nor less embarrassed, have got over thera all. Certainly, then, you raay achieve the same victory. 4. Multitudes allege, also, as a serious objection to the perform ance of this duty, that they shall meet from their families nothing but opposition, censure, and ridicule. To the author of this objection 1 should answer, that it is usual ly, if not always, founded in mistake. Children are by nature prepared to reverence religion. The conscience of raan, before it has been warped, and, overpowered, by passion, prejudice, and sin, prompts him, of course, to regard this solemn and awful ob ject, only with emotions of respect. So obvious is this truth, that it has often been acknowledged by Infidels. Children, therefore, present no obstruction to the performance of this duty. Whatever may be true of other countries, it is certainly true in this,) that the number of woraen is extreraely small, who, discour age in any manner, which, may be styled direct, the ordinances of religion. From thera, therefore, no hindrance will be presented to this duty, unless in cases of a very extraordinary nature. The difficulty, then, which is here alleged, is, in almost every case, created solely by the raan himself. ' I would further ask this objector, have you made the experi ment ? If not, where is your proof of its truth ? If you have, SEK. CXLL] PRAYER TO FAMILIES. ]21 have you attempted to remove it ; and, like a wise and good man, determined to govern your faraily, and subdue so unreasonable a spirit ? This evil is oftener feared than felt. It is doubtful whether the man can be found, who, after a faithful trial, has been prevented by it from the regular worship of God in his family. There is another objection, which, though perhaps never alleg ed in form, has had no small weight in particular cases. It is this : The persons in question have long neglected it, and feel extreme reluctance to exhibit to their families their inconsistency of char acter. Concerning this "objection 1 shall only observe, that it lies equally against all reformation ; and, if yielded to, would effectu ally prevent every sinner from becoming a Christian. Upon the whole, all these objections are either erroneous, or nugatory ; either devised, or adopted, by a mind already willing to neglect the duty ; and fastened upon as the best means, within its reach, to quiet its own conscience, and to justify its conduct in the sight of others. Vol. ir. 16 SERMON CXLII. THE ORDINARY MEANS OF GRACE. THE USEFULNESS OF PRAYER TO COMMUNITIES. ITS EFFICACY IN PROCURING BLESSINGS. — ENCOURAGEMENTS TO FRAYER. Psalm Ixxiii. 28. — It is good for me to draw near unto God. J.N the last discourse, I considered the Usefulness of Prayer to Families. The next thing proposed for discussion was its Usefulr ness to Communities. It may be proper to remind my audience, that the usefulness of prayer was originally mentioned as two-fold; consisting, 1 . In its immediate infiuence on the Suppliant ; and, 2. Its Efficacy in procuring Blessings. Il may be proper further to observe, that, next to the Usefulness of prayer, I proposed to examine the Encouragements to this duty. These three subjects will be considered in the present discourse. In the Text, the Psalmist declares, that it was good for him to draw near to God. If it was good, that is, profitable, for the Psalmist to perform this duly ; it must without a (jueslion be equally profitable to every other individual, who prays with the same spirit. There was nothing in the character of David, which rendered prayer more beneficial to him, than it may be to others. He prayed frequently, faithfully, and earnestly. All, who pray in the same manner, will find the same benefits. Nor will this use fulness be, in any degree, lessened hy the communion of multitudes in this solemn service. On the contrary, it will be increased. The power of sympathy cannot fail to enhance the fervour of prayer, when offered up to God by numerous bodies of mankind. Whatever advantages, then, result from prayer^ generally con sidered, whether offered up in the closet, or in the family, all these will result frora the prayer of Communities. Beside these, public prayer is accompanied by several advantages, in a great measure pecuUar to itself. Particularly, 1. Public Worship is in a prime degree constituted of Public prayer. The benefits of public worship I have considered at large in a former discourse. All these benefits are not, I confess, derived solely from Public prayer. They are, however, so connected with it, as, in a remoter sense, to be justly attributable to its prop er influence. It seems scarcely probable, that without public prayer, the other ordinances of public worship would be cele brated at all ; or the Sabbath at all observed. If we did not feel our dependence upon God for all good, and the absolute necessi- SER. CXLU.] THE USEFULNESS, &c. 123 ty of deriving, and asking, it from him ; there would, apparently, be no mbtives, of sufficient efficacy to preserve public worship in the world. If public prayer were to cease; the Sabbath, it is to be feared, would be forgotten, and the sanctuary deserted. These things being admitted, it follows, that all the blessings, above mentioned, are derived from public prayer; not, indeed, im mediately ; but ultimately. On their importance 1 need not now expatiate. 2. Public prayer, above all things, preserves alive a sense of Na tional dependence on Gdd. The prime mean of preserving in the mind of an individual a sense of his own dependence on his Maker is, confessedly, prayer ; as has been shown at large in a preceding discourse. On fami lies, and on nations, its influence is the sarae. No human emotion has a more advantageous influence on the mind than this. It af fects men deeply in all stations and circumstances ; and affects them all happily. It is a feeling, perfectly just ; and the only just feeling respecting the subject. It is a feeling of high importance : it is a feeling of the most useful tendency. On Rulers its influence is that, and only that, which they need to incline them to rule justly and in the fear of God. A ruler, who feels his dependence on his Maker, will be just, of course ; because he knows, that God is just, and demands exact justice of him ; be cause he knows, that God is an eye-witness of all his conduct ; and because he knows he must give an account of that coriduct, and be rewarded according to its nature. If he does that, which is right ; he is assured of acceptance : if not ; sin, he is equally assured, will lie at his door. , ' With such a sense Of his dependence, a ruler will be merciful also 3 because he knows, that God is merciful, that he loves those who are merciful, and requires mercy of all men, and peculiarly of rulers ; because he knows, that mercy dnd truth uphold the throne of a king, and the office of every other ruler : and because he knows, that, in the end, he himself will infinitely need mercy, that God has pronounced the merciful, blessed, and promised that they shall ob tain mercy, and has awfully declared, that he shall have judgment without mercy, who sheweth no mercij. With this sense of dependence, also, a ruler will be humble. Iri the sight of God, every man, however high his station, howev er extensive his power, is merely a worm of the dust, and crushed before the moth. To a being so frail, so feeble, so dependent, pride cannot belong. His own littleness cannot fail to stare him in the face, vvhenever he remembers, that every thing, which he has, or is, or will be, has been, and must be, solely derived from God ; and for its continuance must depend solely on his pleasure. It is impossible for a mind, fraught with these sentiments, not to forget the haughtiness of power, and the splendpur pf station. At the same time, a ruler thus dis osed will ever call to mind, that 1J4 THE USEFULNESS OF [SER. CXLU. the poor in spirit, the meek, and the humble, are the only persons, to whom good is promised in the Gospel. The haughtiness of man, itis there declared, shall be brought low, and the pride.of all human glory shall he stained. It is there declared, that every proud man is an abomination to the Lord, and shall be stubble for the final day. It is scarcely necessary to observe, hovy important these attri butes are to every ruler, or how beneficial they invariably prove to subjects. With such a character, the ruler cannot fail to be equi table in his laws and administrations, reasonable in his exaction and manageraent of public property, clement in the distribution of justice, conscientious in the perforraance of every duty, and uni versally a minister of God for good to his people. A corresponding infiuence, equally happy, will the same sense of deperidence have on those who are ruled. The same general conscientiousness will prevail in their minds ; a scrupulous obe dience to all laws, and lawful authority; and a steady attach ment to the good order and peace, secured by a Wise adminis tration. Men, formed to sentiments and habits of this nature, are, almost wholly, a different kind of-beings from those, to whom such senti raents are unknown. The motives, by which these two classes of men are governed, are totally diverse. Those of the former class are swayed by the fear and love of God, a disposition to obey him, the dictates of conscience, the hope of final approbation, and the dread of final ruin. Those of the latter class are influenc ed only by present, selfish considerations ; and universally in quire how much they shall gain by submission to Government, or how much they shall lose by revolt. The former obey rulers, are just and kind to each other, and perform all the duties owed to their fellow-men, from conscience and principle. The latter, so far as they perform these duties at all, perform them from convenience only. On the forraer class, full rehance may be uniformly placed. To the latter, no confidence can safely at tach, except when their duty and their selfishness coincide. The obedience of the former is voluntary ; that of the latter, mercenary and venal. Between rulers and subjects, governed by this sense of depen dence on their Maker, arises, of course, an universal confidence. In a country, thus influenced, the government can therefore easily, and will naturally, be mild and gentle. In every other, it must ul timately be a' system of coercion, an administration of force. So ciety in such a country, is established on sounder principles, is formed with juster views, and assumes a nobler character. Itis the society of reason, of friendship, of virtue, of piety. Every thing in the understanding, the heart, and the life, is more accordr ant with the commands of God, and therefore with truth and recti tude. The bonds, which bind the society together, are stronger ; SEB. CXLII.] PRAYER TO CO.MMUNITIES. 125 the trespasses against huraan happiness are fewer, and less atro cious ; the punishments inflicted by the magistrate are milder, and more rare ; and the safety, corafort, and prosperity, enjoyed, are more absolute, uniform, and entire. Of all these blessings. Prayer, both public and private, is in such a sense the source, that without it they never existed in this corrupt world, and never will exist. Nor will their extent ever fail to be proportioned to the prevalence of this duty. I have now finished the, observations, which I intended, con cerning the Usefulness of prayer by its proper Infiuence on the Sup pliant, The next subject, which demands our attention, accord ing to the plan proposed, is its Efficacy in procuring blessings from God. Every considerate man will see infinite motives inviting him to pray, when he discerns, that prayer will of course make him a wiser and a better man, recommend hira to the approbation and favour of God, and prepare hira to receive blessings from his hands ; when he perceives, that in praying he has become obe dient to a high and solemn command, and more attempered to the spirit and character of heaven. These are the most estimable of all blessings : and, as they are blessing^ of such import in them selves, and extend throughout eternity, their value, it is plain, can not be measured. But to many minds, ihe hope of being actually answered, and di rectly, blessed with good, of some extraneous kind, not inwrought in thepersonal character, and distinct from personal improvement and distant fruition, is usually a still more powerful persuasive to prayer. Some persons would be moved by this consideration, who would imperfectly feel the other, great and obvious as it ap pears. It is also a consideration founded in truth and reality ; and for both reasons, merits a place in this systera of discourses. If I am not deceived, the following observations will place it in a convincing light. 1 . From the infiuence, which prayer has naturally on the sup pliant, there is no small probability, that God will grant blessings in answer to the petitions of those, who faithfylly perform this duty. From the observations, raade in a former discourse concerning the influence, which prayer has on the suppliant, it is evident, that by the faithful performance of this duty he is, in all respects, made a fitter recipient of blessings, than he can be otherwise. No rational doubt can be entertained, that God will bestow his bless ings on such, as are thus fitted to receive them, rather than on such, as are not. It is evidently proper, that he should regard with compassion and kindness, and that he should communicate good to, -those, who felt their dependence on hira; acknowledged his sufficiency, and disposition, to supply their wants ; humbly be sought his mercy ; realized their own undeserving .character; and were grateful to him for every blessing, which they received ; when 1 OQ TIIE USEFULNESS OF [SER. CXLU with equal propriety he would refuse the same blessings to men, who felt no dependence but on themselves ; who were too indif ferent, too lazy, or too proud, to ask ; who questioned his right to require, and their own obligation to perform, this duty ; or who were too ungrateful to acknowledge their own, indebtedness to him for the mercies, which they received, or his goodness in bestowing them. Were God to pursue any other course of administrations, it is difficult to conceive how he could act as a moral governor, and secure, without coercion, the obedience of his subjects. 2. The instances are numerous, in which blessings are actually given in anszuer to prayer. I am well aware of the objection, which lies against this doc trine. Il may, I am sensible, be always said in reply, that we know not whether the same blessings would not have descended, if prayers had not been offered up for them. Without the aid of Revelation, 1 acknowledge, this cannot be known with certainty : since he, who gives blessings, is the only being, who originally knows the reason, for which he gives them. Still, from the course of providence merely, the prpbability is strong, that the blessings in question are given, only in answer to prayer. In support of this assertion I observe, that blessings have in many instances been given, after fervent prayers have ascended to God, when none but God could have contributed to their existence ; vvhen they were utterly unattainable by any human efforts ; after all such efforts had been made without success ; after all hope of obtaining them, except by prayer, had vanished ; and when. Give us help, from trouble, for vain is the help ofman, had become the only language, seriously thought of by those who were concerned. Of such in stances I could easily mention a considerable number. Many more, there is every reason to believe, are remarked by every ob serving, religious man. Many more still would, I doubt not, have been remarked, if religious men were more observant, and prayer were more continually and faithfully performed. It will be said still, that even these blessings might have been given, had they not been supj)licated. To this suggestion of pos sibility the proper answer is,. " They might not." We knovf- tiiey were not given without prayer ; and have not a shadow of reason to conclude, that, if they had not been prayed for, they would ever have been given. The suggestion, therefore, is useless to the purpose for which it is made. But the complete proof lies in this ; that certain blessings are not given to men, who do not pray ; and those, blessings of the high est iraportance. Such are Peace of conscience, Joy in the Holy Ghost, the Hope, 'Vf\iich maketh not ashamed, increase of grace, and Final perseverarice in piety. These are the best of all bless ings : and these are never found by those, who do not pray* They are also blessings, which none but God cap giye. As there- a SER. CXLU.] PRAYER TO COMMUNITIES. 127 fore, they are given to those only, who pray ; so they are plainly given as an answer to prayer. _ At the same time, I am bound, as an inhabitant of New-Lnglancl, solemnly to declare, that, were there no other instances to be found in any other country, the blessings, communicated to this, would furnish ample satisfaction concerning this subject to every sober, much more, to every pious, man. Among these, the destruc tion ofthe French armament under ihe Duke D^Anville, in the year 1746, ought to be reraerabered with gratitude, and admiration, by every inhabitant of this Counfry. This fleet consisted of forty ships of war ; was destined for the desfruction of New-England ; was of sufficient force to render that destruction, in the ordinary progress of things, certain ; sailed from Chebucto, in Nova-Scotia, for this purpose ; and was entirely destroyed, ori the night follow ing a general fast throughout New-England, by a terrible tempest. Impious men, who regard not the work of the Lord, nor the ope ration of his hands, and who for that reason are finally desfroyed, may refuse to give God the glory of this most merciful interposi tion. But our Ancestors had, and it is to be hoped their descend ants ever will have, both piety and good sense, sufficient to ascribe to Jehovah the greatness and the power, and the victory, and the majesty; and to bless the Lord God of Israel for ever and ever. 3. The Scriptures put ihis subject out of doubt hy declaring. direct ly, that blessings are given to mankind in answer to prayer. To prevent any misapprehension concerning the views, now to be exhibited of this subject, I observe, that I do not consider prayer as meriting, in any case, the blessings, which are given to the suppliant. All blessings are bestowed upon man by the un merited mercy of God : as is unanswerably evident from the fact, that men universally are sinners ; and deserve, of course, nothing but punishment. Nor do I intend, that the prayers of men change, at all, the views, dispositions, or purposes of God. The Father cf lights, from whom cometh down every good and perfect gift, is without variableness; or shadow of turning. No suppliant, therefore, is encouraged to pray by an*expectation, or a possibility, of producing the least change, in the glorious Object of his prayers. But I intend, that prayer is, iri this sense, the means of procur ing blessings : viz. that without prayer the blessings ipould never be obtained. In the immutable counsels of God it is established, that there shall be an inseparable connexion between humble, faithful prayer, and the blessings, needed by the supphant. Prayer is, therefore, as re gular, nay, more regular, a cause of blessings, .than ploughing and sowing, rain and sunshine, are of the harvest. In support of this position, I shall now allege several passages of Scripture, sufficient, in my view, to estabhsh the doctrine be yond reasonable debate. '* 128 THE USEFULNESS OF [SER. CXLII. The only condition, upon which mankind receive any bless ings, is given us by our Saviour in that remarkable passage : Ask, and ye shall receive; Seek, and ye shall find ; Knock, and it shall he opened to you. For, every one that asketh receiveth ; and he that seeketh findeth ; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened. As asking is here made the condition of receiving; il is plain, that, if we perform not this condition; we are assured, that we shall not receive. . Again. Verily, verily, I say unto you, that whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in-my narrie, he will give it you. John xvi. 23. Here the promise is unlimited, as to the good, which is asked ; and absolute, as to the certainty of receiving it. More cannot be expressed, nor desired. Again. Whatsoever we ask, we receive of him. 1 John iii. 22. -Quotations of this nature need not be multiplied. As proof, that prayer is not offered up in vain, I allege Isaiah xlv. 19. / said not to the seed of Jacob, Seek ye me in vain. In this passage, God declares, that it was no part of his declarations to Israel, that they sought him, or prayed to him, in vain. Of conse quence, it was no part of his counsels with respect to that people. But the counsels of God towards his people, in the different ages of the world, are in substance the same. It is now as true, as it was when this prophecy was uttered, that they never seek, that they never pray, in vain. The prevailing power of prayer is directly, as well as strongly, asserted by St. James. The effectual frrv ent prayer of a righteous man, availeth much. Is any sick, says the same apostle, let him call for the Elders of the Church ; and lei them pray over M'm. And the prayer of faith shall save the sick ; and the Lord shall raise him up. If he liave committed sins, they shall be forgiven him. To illustralfe all these declarations, Si. James adduces the exam ple of Elijah ; who, although a frail man, like others, grayed ear nestly, thai it might not rain, arid it rained not on the earth by the space of three years and six .months. And he prayed again; and the heaven gave rain, and the earth brought forth her fruit. These great effects, it is to be remembered, were consequences of the sprayers of a single man. After the glorious predictipn, communicated to Ezekiel con cerning the return of the Jews to their own land in the latter days ; a prediction delivered in absolute terms by God himself; the same great Being declares. Yet for all this will I be inquired of, that is, prayed to, by the house of Israel, to do it for them. Ab solute as the promises of these vast blessings were, still the blessings were to be given, only in answer to the prayers of the recipients. Among the divine promises concerning the Millennial happi ness, this is a remarkable one. My house shall be called, a house of SER.CXL1I.] PRAYER TO COMMUNITIES. J 29 prayer for all people. From this great fact will arise, inseparably, the happiness itself. Without such an universal spirit of prayer, as is here predicted, the peculiar blessings of that singular period would never exist : for then, as in all preceding periods, the only ordinance of God concerning this subject will be. Ask and ye shall receive. From all these passages it is, I think, unanswerably evident, that prayer is entirely efficacious to procure blessings frora God. It ought here to be further observed, that we are not to expect any thing in answer to our prayers, which is not agreeable to the will of God. Nor ought we to wish any thing, which is not of this nature, to be given to us : for nothing else will prove a blessing. Whatever is right, and proper to be done, is a part of the divine will. Nor ought we to expect the very same kinds, or measures, oi good, for which we pray. Often, these would not be good for us : - or if good for us at all, they would not be so at the times, and in the manner, in which we ask for them. Good will always be given in answer to our prayers ; but it will be real good ; such as God sees to be good ; and not such as we erroneously may imagine to be of this nature. REMARKS. 1. All persons have abundant encouragement to pray to God, This was originally proposed as a distinct head of discourse. I have chosen to introduce it in this form, because it grows so naturally out of the two preceding heads ; and because it lias, of necessity,beenanticipatedintheconsiderationofthem. The useful ness of prayer by its own proper influence, and by its efficacy in pro- Curing blessings from God, are prime Encouragements to the per formance of this duty. The certain prospect of becoming better, wiser, more lovely in the sight of God, and more filled to receive blessings from his hands, and of actually gaining the blessings by known, limited, and easy efforts, is a combination of the highest and npblgst motives, which can influence a rational being. To every sup pliant these motives are continually presented. They are pre sented by God himself : they are established by his undeceiving declarations :, they are obvious to our own reason : they are, therefore, real : and ought plainly to have their full influence on every reasoning mind. The good in view is .the greatest gOod. Nay, there is no other real good, It is good, in certain reversion for every suppliant. In support of this scherae, may be alleged, as full evidence, the numerous examples, in which these great consequences of prayer have actually existed ; exaraples, faithfully recorded in the Scrip tures for our encourag-ement in this duty. Vol, IV. 17 1 30 THE USEFULNESS OF [SER. CXLH. Abimelech received an entire deliverance from the distresses, in which his family were involved, as an answer to the prayer of Abraham. As an answer to the prayers of Abraham also, God assured him, that, if ten righteous men should be found in the cities of the plain, he would spare those cities ; and not consign them to the punish ment, which their sins had so eminently deserved. In answer to the prayer of Job, God forgave the sin and folly of his three friends, in not speaking of him the thing which was right. At the prayer of Moses, the Israelites were not only deliver ed frora many other evils, but preserved, also, from utter ex tinction. At the prayer of Gideon, the dew fell on the ground, and not on the fleece ; and again on the fleece, and not on the ground ; that he might know the will of Gpd ; and be satisfied, that he acted un der a divine commission. At the prayer of Samuel, the Lord thundered on the army of the Philistines, and wrought a great salvation for Israel. At the prayer of Hezekiah, his life was lengthened fifteen years. In answer to the prayer of Daniel, Gabriel was sent from the highest heavens, to explain the wonderful and distressing vision, disclosed to hira concerning future times. As an answer to the prayers of Cornelius, an Angel was sent to direct him to send for Peter, who should teach him words, whereby he, and alLhis house, should be saved. The Apostles lived on prayer ; and received, continually, many great, and wonderful blessings, as immediate answers to their prayers. To these and other examples of the same nature, recorded in the Scriptures, -^ay be added the comraands, parables, and promises, which every where enjoin, explain, and enforce, this great duty. To all these things may, also, be added the perfect example of the Lord Jesus Christ; who in the days of his flesh offered up prayers and supplications, with strong, crying and tears, unto Him that was able to save him from death; and was heard in that he feared : or, as the Greek may well be rendered, on account of his piety. This example unites all motives. It is a perfect pattern to us ; as being perfectly conformed to the will of God. It is a clear proof, that no being in a dependent state, however excellent, is exempted from this duty, or frora the universal law of God's providence, which connects blessings only with prayer. , If God would have blessed any being without prayer ; he certainly would have blessed Christ. As certainly, Christ, had such been the fact, would not have prayed, since his prayers, in that case, would have been a vain and useless service. The will of his Father he certainly knew ; and prayed, only because it was agreeable to his SER. CXLII.] PRAYER TO COMMUNITIES. 131 will. Accordingly, his prayers were heard, and always heard. This example, also, has the entire force of a command ; and is in vested with divine authority. If, then, we obey and follow him in this great duty ; we shall do that, which is right in the sight of God, as he did ; shall be accepted for his sake, as he was accept ed ; and shall be rewarded and blessed as he was. In these things, thus combined, there is plainly all possible en couragement to pray, and to continue steadfast in prayer. The Father of all mercies regards us in this institution as his children ; prepares us by this duty most happily to realize his character as the Giver of every good and perfect gift ; and fits us in the best manner also to receive his blessings, when they are bestowed. He forms us to the spirit and conduct of children ; and is Himself ready to give good things of all kinds to us, when we thus ask him. Jn our petitions^ we learn the nature and value of his blessings ; our own absolute need of them ; and his unspeakable goodness in furnishing them for our enjoyraent. We learn to depend on him ; to trust in him ; and to exercise towards him unceasing love, rev erence, gratitude, and praise. At the same time, we are assured, that we shall never ask in vain. 2. From these considerations I urge, anew, the folly, and sin, of those, who neglect prayer. Prayer is the avenue to all good, temporal and eternal ; and lo us the only avenue. He who will not pray, therefore, shuts up the only passage, which has been opened for him by God to the attainment of happiness. It may be alleged here, but it will be alleged to no purpose, that multitudes, who do not pray, are as prosperous as those, who do. An ox is pampered, but it is only for the slaughter. The enjoyments of this life are never bless ings to him, that does not pray. If they are merely means of luxury, hardness of heart, and grossness of life, he, who enjoys them, will only treasure up wrath against the day of wrath. On the part of God, indeed, they are always kindly given ; but on the part of the recipient, they are regularly abused by being made incentives to sin. They are, therefore, curses to him by his own perversion ; and are styled blessings, only by an abuse of language. Without prayer there is no virtue ; no piety ; no obedience to God. The commencement of piety in Saul of Tarsus, was thus announced by the Holy Ghost : Behold he prayeth. But without piety there is no blessing reserved for man. He may, indeed, be rich, and great, and luxurious ; may be clothed in purple and fine linen; and may fare sumptuously every day. Such was the condi tion ofthe rich man in the parable. But at the end of a short life, he lifted up his eyes in hell, being in torment ; and found, that he had received all his good tMngs in this life. What excuse, then, can be devised for the neglect of prayer ? Is it a hard service ? Be it so. Is not the reward sufficiently great 132 THE USEFULNESS OF [SER. CXLU. to retribute the toil ? Good in hand, of every kjnd whieh is real and desirable, and good to come inestimable and endless, are cer tainly deserving of any labour, or suffering, which men can under go. However severe may bp the labour of performing the duty, the compensation is certainly ample and complete. .. But is it more severe than the daily toil of laborious men ? This you yourselves see cheerfully undergone, merely for the common gains of avarice, by milhons, who do not, and cannot know, that those gains will be good at all. To every sincere suppliant all things work together for good. How vast the difference in these rewards ! Is it harder than profane swearing and cursing ? In them, as in prayer, all the labour which exists, exists only in the utterance of .words : and multitudes in these evil practises expend much more . time, and breath, than is demanded in prayer. All these, also, labour m vain, and spend their strength for nought. Nay, what is infinitely worse, they labour only to be poor, and wretched, and miserable. But is it hard at all ? Is it a hard condition, for the attainment of all good; to ask it ; and, above all things, to ask it of the infinitely blessed and bountiful God ? It has been, and undoubtedly will be again, objected by multi tudes, some of them probably in this audience, that they cannot pray. Let me ask those, who make this objection, have you tried ? tried, I mean, in earnest ? You will be obhged to answer in the negative. You have never seriously atterapted to perform this du ty. Whence then do you know, that you cannot pray ? How do you know, that God will not willingly do for you whatever you find it impossible, or difficult, to do for yourselves ? He is infinitely willing to give, in answer to your prayers. Whence have you learned, that he is not equally willing lo befriend you in your at tempts, to pray ? The truth is, you do not choose lo make such attempts. You have wants endlessly nuraerous, and incalculably important. They might be supplied : but you will not ask God to supply them. You have souls of infinite value. They might be saved : but you will not ask God to save thera. You are sinners, and exposed to perdition. From these tremendous evils you might be delivered : but will not ask God lo deliver you* You are made carididates for Heaven; and raight be received into that glorious world of everlasting joy. Rather than pray, you choose to perish. All blessings are opened for your enjoyraent. The condition on which yoii may obtain them all, is io ask. No sacrifice, ex pense, or loss, is deraanded of you. None will be incurred. On the contrary, praying is in itself unspeakable gain, and solid pleasure ; higher, more rational, more unmingled pleasure, than you ever found, or ever will find, in sin. The condition, there- SER. CXLU.] PRAYER TO CO.MMUNITIES. I33 fore, is a gainful condition of a reward without bounds, and with out end. What, then, is your conduct, but supreme and unmingled folly? Fools, saith Solomon, despise wisdom and instruction, and hate knowkdgei This wisdom, of supreme import, has been .taught to you a thousand times. Hitherto you have despised and hated it. The evil of neglecting prayer has been often urged on you ; but hitherto it has been urged in vain. Hitherto you have de ceived yourselves with the folly of believing, that God will bless you, while you refuse to pray to him : in oth.er words, that he will bless you, in direct contradiction to his own express declarations. What specimen of folly can be greater ! That you should be thus deceived, with your present character, is not strange : since the Scriptures inform us, that it is the nature of folly to be deceit ful. That you should think yourselves right in these views, and in the conduct which grows out of them, is as little strange : for, persons of this character, according to the same divine testimony, usually think themselves right. But let me remind you from the same sacred book, that Fools die for want of wisdom. In your present course, you are in the road to death. For want of wisdom, only, do you continue in it a single day. Should the same folly be prolonged : the period is not distant, when you will die for ever. SERMON CXLIII. THE ORDINARY MEANS OF GRACE. THE OBJECTIONS TO PRAYER , CONSIDERED. Job xxi. 15. — What is ihe Almighty, that we should serve him ; and what profit shall we have, if we pray unto liim ? \ YiE five first subjects, originally proposed as themes of dis course concerning the duty of prayer, have been examined at length in the four preceding Serraons. The sixth, viz. Objections against this duty, will now occupy our attention. In the Text, a general objection is made against all obedience to God ; and is professedly founded on his character. What is the Almighty, that we should serve him ? There is nothing in the char acter of God, nor in our relation f o him, which requires our obedi ence to his will. We are neither obliged by any duty, nor drawn by any interest, to his service. This impious sentiment is exhibited in the context as the sentiment of abandoned men only ; and is plainly of a nature too impious to be uttered by any other. The following one, proceeding from the same mouth also, is with per fect propriety exhibited to us as resulting from the same spirit. Yet there are multitudes, who are far from deserving the character of profligacy, who yet say concerning God, What profit shall we have, if we pray to him? This objection, it will be observed, is an universal one. What profit shall we have ? ihatis, we shall not be profited at all, either in our minds, or in our circumstances. We shall not be profited by the proper influence of prayer on our selves, nor by its efficacy in, procuring blessings from God. All objections against prayer may be justly regarded as being summed up in this single question. It cannot, however, be expected, that on this occasion every objection, which an irreligious mind can devise against this duty, will be taken up, and refuted. Several such objections have been anticipated in the preceding discourses. Of such as remain, I shall examine those only, which may be supposed to have some real weight in the mind of a sober man. These, so far as I recollect them, respect the Predetermination, Immutability, Knowledge, and. Wisdom, of God; and, ' The supposed Vanity, and Presumption, of prayer. SER. CXLin.] THE OBJECTIONS, Sic. 134 I shall consider them in their order. The two first of these subjects are commonly united in the scheme of the objector: and may, therefore, with propriety, be here considered together. If God be a changeable being ; although he may have predetermined all things, yet he may be supposed to alter his plans in consequence of requests, presented to him by his Intelligent creatures; and may, therefore, be addressed as a changeable being. On the other hand, if God be immutable, and yet have formed no system of things in his own mind ; he may, perhaps, constitute his designs, from time to tirae, wilh some degree of conformity to their supplications. The first objection, which I shall mention, and which is de rived from these sources, is usually stated in terms like the fol lowing.) " Prayer is fruitless, orin the language of the Text, unprofitable, because all things are determined from everlasting by an immuta ble God, and will, therefore, take, place according to his« deter mination. Hence our prayers, making no alteration in any thing, must be an idle, perhaps an impious, service : idle, because they can effect nothing ; impious, because they are expressions of our desires for blessings, which God has not chosen to give. If God has determined to give us these blessings ; we shall receive them without prayer. If he has determined not to give them, we shallnot receive them, however fervently we may pray. So far, then, as we pray for things, which God has determined to give, our prayers are useless. So far as we pray for those, which he has determined not to give, our prayers are directly opposed to his pleasure." I have endeavoured to state this objection at full length, because I wish to present it with all the force, which it has, or can have, in the mind of the objector. To the several things, contained in it, I answer, . 1 . There cannot possibly he any impiety in prayer, offered up in the manner stated in these discourses. The original definition, which I gave of prayer, and with which all the subsequent accounts of it have accorded, is that of the West minster Assembly of Divines : That prayer is an offering up ofour desires to God for things agreeable to his will. To desire that, and that only, which is agreeable to the will of God, cannot be impious. Evangelical prayer supposes in its very nature, that we ask either for those things for which the Scriptures have expressly permitted us to pray ; or for those which we professedly submit to his will in our petitions. In this conduct, impiety cannot exist. On the con trary, no human being was ever the subject of piety, who did not pursue this conduct. The objection is now reduced to a single. article ; viz. Thefruit- lessness of prayer; or its inefficacy to change the purposes of God, and therefore to procure blessings. To this I answer, 136 THE OBJECTIONS TO [SER. CXLUI. 2. This objection lies, with exactly the same force, against every other human effort, as against prayer. If the predetermination and irarautability of God render it im proper for men to pray, because their prayers cannot change his purposes ; then the same things must render it equally improper for men to plough, sow, reap, or raake any other effort for any end whatever. All these, without the divine blessing, will be in vain ; and can no raore change the purpose of God, than prayer. With just the sarae propriety and force, may the farmer say, " It is in vain for me to plough, or sow, or reap : since, if God has determined to give me a crop, I shall have it without either of these efforts. On the contrary, if he has determined not to give me a crop ; I shall not have it, however faithfully I may labour. My ploughing, sowing, and reaping, therefore, must be all idle, be cause they will all be fruidess." In the same manner may the Student say, " If God has deter mined _.that I should possess learning, I shall possess it without study : but if he has determined that 1 shall not possess learning, I shall not acquire it, although I study vvith ever so much dili gence." In j.he same manner, may every man say concerning his exer tions. This reasoning, were we governed by it, vvould plainly put an end to all human exertions at once ; and we should neither plough, nor build, nor collect food, or fuel ; nor teach, nor study, nor make any other attempt to promote the good, either of ourselves or others. Conclusions, so evidentiy false as these, and so fraught wilh necessary mischief, cannot flow from sound principles. Safe ly, therefore, may we pronounce the proofs, by which they are professedly established, to be hollow and deceitful. 3. There is a radical, and gross, error in this objection ; viz. that God has predetermined the end, and not ihe means. This opinion is equally contradictory to the Scriptures, and to common sense. St, Paul, a little before his shipwreck, was in formed by an Angel, that God had given him all them, that sailed with hirrp. Yet afterwards, when the shipmen were about to fiee out of the ship ; when they had let down the boat into ihe sea ; Paul said to the centurion, and the soldiers, except these abide in the ship ye cannot he saved. Acts xxvii. 22, 30, 31. The end here deter mined, was the preservation of the ship's company. The means, indispensable to this end, were the continuance of the seamen in the ship, and their exertions to bring il to land. These were predetermined equally with the end ; and vvere absolutely; neces sary to its existence. Equally necessary are ploughing and sowing, rain and sunshine, to the existence of a crop ; studying, to the acquisition of knowledge ; and all other efforts of men, to the pur poses, which they actually accomplish. All these are equally SER. CXLIII.] PRVYER CONSIDERED. ] 37 predetermined with the ends accomplished ; and equally parts ol the divine system. Another error is involved, also, in the same objection ; viz. that God bestows blessings upon mankind, which are not given in answer to prayer. Of such a determination there is not, and there cannot, be any evidence. The Scriptures decisively teach us, that the only condition of r«cewmg is a^^in^. Prayer, therefore, as means to the end, that is, the reception of blessings, is itself a part, and an inseparable part, of the predetermined plan of God. When any man considers how useful prayer is lo form us into a fitness for the reception of blessings ; he will easily discern pne great and solid reason of this divine constitution of things. There is no moral subject, concerning which mankind appear to have fallen into more, and greater, errors, than concerning this. The character of God, with respect to both these subjects, is un doubtedly far removed, in many particulars, above our compre hension. In several others, it seems to be capable of a satisfac tory illustration to a sober mind, not unwilling to be satisfied. Nothing is more certain, than that, if God ever was, is, or will be, the subject of any determinations, he must have formed them from eternity. In him there is no variableness, neither shadow of turning. Of course, he can never be the subject of any new de terminations. He can have no new ideas, thoughts, or views. All his works were known to him from the beginning. This is cer tain even to -Reason ; for all his works were contrived by him, and therefore were unquestionably known. Hence, no being, and no event, can be any thing, but what he contrived, and knew. As he is perfecdy the sarae ; as the being, and the event, in each case is, also, invariably the same, as when originally contem plated by him ; whatever choice, or preference, he originally ex perienced, must for ever be his invariable choice, or preference. If, therefore, he did not originally determine, choose, or prefer, he certainly never will. Further; The existence of God is one unvarying present exist ence ; and his duration an eternal Now, without past, or future ; nearer in its nature, to one indivisible moment ofour existence, than to any thing else, which we experience, or know. He literally inhabits eternity, or fills it all at once ; just as he fills iraraensity at once, and not, successively, its several parts. When, there fore, we say, that God predetermined all things, it is .as true, in the_ metaphysical sense, that he determines them after, as before, their existence. In strict truth, therfe is no pi'oper comparison between our successive being, and the unchanging existence of God. One thing only is present to us at any present time. Every thing, and every time, is absolutely present to God. His crea- ation and providence, together with all their beings and events are always before his view, as a picture containing many images is present before ours. Vol, IV, 18 138 THE OBJECTIONS TO [SER. CXLIU. Every part of God's predetermination is founded on exactly the same reason with those, on which the same determination would be founded, if all beings and events had already existed ; and God, in the possession of the same omniscience, should then survey them with a perfect discernment of their natures and relations, form his own determinations concerning them, and pronounce, with re spect to every one, his unerring judgment. Of course, his pre determinations are exactly the same with such determinations; as would exist in his mind, after every thing had taken place ; and are all exactly just, and right ; such as perfect wisdom and good ness, understanding them entirely, would dictate, and approve. Nor is: the immutability of God at all more liable to objections. God from everlasting was exactly what all beings ought, to wish him to be; possessed of every excellence in an infinite de gree, and the subject of no imperfection either natural or moral. He knows, and ever knew, all things, both actual and possible. He can do all things ; and is infinitely disposed to do every thing, and that only, which is absolutely right and good. Consequently there is nothing, there never has been, ther^ never will be, any thing, which, considered merely as a work of God, is not exactly right. In that vast kingdom, which fills immensity and eternity, there will never exist, a single being, or event, which perfect wis dom and goodness could wish not to have existed. Who can rationally desire a change in such a character as this ? What would the change be ? A change from perfection to imper fection ; from knowledge to ignorance ; from truth to falsehood; from justice to injustice ; from kindness to cruelty ; from univer sal excellence to universal turpitude. Perfection can be changed into nothing but imperfection. The immutability of God is indis pensable to the glory of his character ; and is itself a part of his perfection: for no mutable being can be perfect in the same sense with one who is immutable. Equally is it the corner-stone, on which the universe rests. Were this support taken away, the immense fabric would tumble into ruin. To his creatures there would be neither safety, nor hope : but immensity, and eternity, would be filled with suspense, terror, and anguish. Particularly, there would not, in this case, be the least founda tion for encouragement in prayer. If all the determinations of God were not settled in heaven ; who could divine what new de cisions would exist ? what new laws ? what new systems of admin- isfration ? Prayer,'commahded to-day, might be forbidden to-mor row. Prayer, acceptable to him to-day, might be hateful to him to-morrow. The things, for which we now ask with certain as* surance of being heard, might speedily be denied. He, who at one season did his duty, might, at another, by the very same con- dufct, be only exposed to punishment. Nothing in this case; could be known by creatures to be permanently agreeable to his will, and finally secure of a reward. The government of the universe SER. CXLIU.] PRAYER CONSIDERllD. 139 would be a government of fickleness and caprice ; and conse quently more or less, and no finite being can conjecture how far, a government of oppression and cruelty. Think what would be the exertions and effects of Infimte knowledge and power, wielding the scepfre of the universe under the control of so dangerous a disposition. For aught that can be foreseen, the time might speedily, as well as easily, arrive, when under such a dominion, this vast empire might, in a moment of change, be reducisd to a desert of ravage and ruin. As things are actually ordered by God, every part of the sys tem is established on immoveable foundations. Every Intelligent creature knows, therefore, or may know, on what he is absolutely to depend. If he is obedient, his obedience will always be ac ceptable to his Maker. The law, once established, will nevet be changed. Sooner shall Heaven and Earth pass away, than one jot, or time, of it shall pass, until all he fulfilled. Every declaration of God is true: every promise will be exactly accomphshed. Whatever sins, or backslidings, the children of God raay have com mitted; his promise assures them of everlasting hfe. Whatever gross guilt, or impious rebellion, a Christian may have been the subject of, if they do not involve the sin against the Holy Ghost ; still, if he exercises repentance towards God, and faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ, he will be received in the end. Of this unchangeable system; one great and glorious part is, that every humble, faithful prayer, shall be certainly heard, accept ed, and answered. Not one ever was, or will be, offered up in vain. This scheme of things contains every possible encourage ment to pray ; and displays the absolute necessity, as well as the superior usefuli;iess and efficacy, of prayer. Any other scheme would exceedingly lessen, or entirely destroy, both the encourage ment, and the usefulness, of prayer. So far, then, are the predetermination and immutabihty of God from preventing and discouraging prayer, that they hold out infi nitely more and greater inducements to this duty, than' can be fur nished in any other manner. I have dwelt the longer, and the more particularly, upon this ob jection, because I consider it as the fundamental one ; and because I believe it to be, in some minds, regarded as possessing real weight, and attended by real difficulties. 2. It is also objected, that it is useless; and irhpertinent, to declare our wants to an omniscient Being, because he knows ihem already. That God knows all our wants, that he knows them more per fectly than ourselves, and that he thus knew them from eternity, will, it is presumed, be universally admitted here. This kndw- ledge must be attributed to God by every man, who beheves the Scriptures, or considers him as the Author of all things. ' To give him, therefore, any information concerning ourselves. With a sup position that he needs thus to be informed, can never be the in- / / 140 THE OBJECTIONS TO [SER. CXLIU. tention of a Christian suppliant ; nor any part of a Christian prayer. The true end of reciting orir wants before Gpd i,s, doubtless, far distant from any thing that is even glanced at in the objection. Unquestionably it is the same end with that, which we propose in confessing our sins ; viz. the production of proper views in our own minds. Il is tp awaken in ourselves a strong sense of our feebleness, our guilt, our dependence on God for all "good, and our indebtedness to him for every blessing which we receive. By such views, deeply impressed, we are more happily prepared for the reception of blessings, than we otherwise can be. We are rendered humble ; submissive ; affected with the greatness of our necessities, the importance of those supplies, which we ask, and the glory of that goodness, by which such wants of such beings are supplied. This stale of mind is the happiest of all disposi tions for the reception of mercies ; and is inwrought effectually in us, only by prayer. Unless man, therefore, has an interest in not acquiring this disposition, the objection is groundless. 3. It is further objected, that, as God is infinitely wise dnd good, whether we consider him as having predetermined all things, or not, his wisdom and goodness will prompt him to give us whatever is pro per to be given, and to withhold whatever is not, equally with, and zuithout, our prayers. Our ' prayers, therefore, must at .the best be useless. "We cannot," sayS; the objector, "prevent, change, or influence, the dictates of Infinite wisdpm and goodness by our prayers. If we could ; it would be wrong, and undesira:- ble ; and ought plainly neither to be done, nor wished." All this is readily admitted : and, were the design, or the nature, of prayer such, as is here supposed, the impropriety of praying would, I presume, be also admitted. Certainly, il could ne-ver be a propdr design, in any creature, to attempt a change in the dic tates of Infinite wisdom and goodness. But it may be very proper for infinite wisdom to bestow op a humble suppliant that, which il vvould very properly withhold from him, who refuses lo pray. The question is not, here, concerning what infinite wisdom will, or vvill not, give ; but concerning the persons, to whom, it will give. Infinite wisdom may bestow all its favours on those, who are willing to ask for them ; arid not on those; who are unwilling : on those, who feel their dependence up on itself ; not on those, who say in their conduct. What is the At.. mighty, that we should serv.e him? and what profit shall we have, if we pray unto Mm ? on those vvho cheerfully, and implicitly, subject themselves to its dictates ; not on those, who speculate ingenious ly cpncerning them. Finally; Infinite wisdom may with propriety communicate its blessings to those, who by such means, as are in their power, be come prepared to receive thera with a spirit of gratitude, reverence, and obedience ; and may with eqi^al propriety withhold them, at SER. CXLUI.] PRAYER CONSIDERED. 141 the sarae time, from such as are too proud, loo indolent, too indif ferent, or too worldly-minded, lo regard them with serious attention, or to receive thera with a grateful or reverential spirit. Until all this can be disproved, the objection will stand for nothing. But this can never be disproved. Reason declares i I all as her. own decision ; and Revelation places it beyond a cavil, or a doubt. In the Scriptures we are taught expressly, that such is the real sys.tem of Infinite wisdora and goodness ; and that blessings actually de scend only as answers lo prayer. 4. Itis further objected, that to suppose our prayers sufficiently ef ficacious to procure blessings for ourselves, and especially for others, indicates vanity and presumption. If we thought our prayers sufficiently meritorious, in the sight of God, to deserve such blessings, as are bestowed either on our selves, or on others ; there would be some ground for this objec tion. But when we pray, as an act of obedience to his will, it is obviously unfounded. There can be neither presumption, nor vanity, in beheving that God is pleased with obedience, and that he will bless those who obey. God has commanded all , men to pray to him. There-is no presumption in believing this precept. He has declared, that faithful prayer is pleasing lo him. There is no presuraption in beheving his declaration. He has promised to bless thpse whp thus, pray. Without presumption we may rely on his promise. He has commanded us to pray for all men ; and has promised to answer such prayers, when faithfully presented. In the Scriptures he has recorded numerous instances, in which he has actually an swered such prayers by giving blessings lo those, for whora they were asked. To obey this coramand, to confide in this promise, and to receive this testimony, is neither vain, por presumptuous. The contrary conduct is chargeable vvith this criminality : for the objector supposes, that Gpd will give hira blessings in a way di recdy opposed to that, in vvhich alone hei has encouraged men to expect them. But further ; does not God make one man the instrument of blessings to another ; to many; to thousands ; to'millions; and that in an iraraense variety of ways? How does it appear, that theheart, the desires, the supplications, of a good man may not be the means of such blessings' as truly, as properly, andas often, as his voice, or his hands ? All these blessings come from God. Will not he, who seeth not ashman seeth, but looketh on the heart, as willingly regard theyii-tuous efforts, of which he is there a witness, as those of the hands, or the tongue ? How few blessings do we enjoy, in which others have not been more or less instruinental 1 For oiir daily foodand raiment, nay, for our very being, we are indebted to those, who have lived in every age of time. In the same manner we are now reaping the benefits, flowing from the prayers of good men in all past ages. The salvation of every 142 THE OBJECTIONS TO [SER. CXLIU. Christian is a direct answer to the prayer of Christ. John xvii. 21,22. These are all the material objections, usually made against prayer, as a duty of man : I mean, all which are customarily ex hibited, as material, by the objectors themselves. If the obser vations, which have here been made in answer to them, have the same weight in the minds of others, as in my own ; it will be seen, that they nave no solid basis. Notwithstanding the speciousness vvhich in the eyes of sorae individuals they have seemed to wear, the encouragements to this duty, mentioned in these discourses, stand altogether unassailed, and possessed of their whole strength. The objectors have conceived erroneously both of the nature, and design, of prayer: and misapprehended the proper influence of the several things, from which they derive their supposed difficulties. Let every one of my audience, then, go fearlessly, and constant ly, to the duty of prayer ; and be perfectly assured, that if he prays faithfully, he will not pray in vain. Let him remember, that prayer is a duty, instituted by God ; that he cannot but honour his own institution ; and that he cannot but be pleased with those, by whom it is obeyed. - To pray is to obey God ; to please him ; to honour him. Those, who honour him, he will honour ; while those, who despise him, shall he lightly esteemed. He has set before you every motive to induce you to perform this duty ; comraands ; ex amples, particularly that -of Christ ; proraises ; instances of the actual and wonderful efficacy of prayer ; and the clearest testi monies of his own approbation. At the same time, while he has taught you, that no blessing is given but in answer to prayer, he has assured you also, that all good, temporal and eternal, descends as its proper answer from Heaven. Nothing has he left untried to persuade you to this duty. With his good pleasure, all your own interests conspire in urg ing you to pray. Prayer will make you daily better, wiser, and lovelier in his sight, by cherishing in you those views and emo tions, which constitute the character of a good man. It will sooth every tumult of your bosoras ; allay your fears ; comfort your sorrows ; invigorate your hopes ; give you peace in hand, and anticipate glory to coriie. It will restrain you from sin; strength en you against temptation ; recall you from wandering ; give life and serenity to your consciences ; furnish you with clearer views concerning your duty ; alarm you concerning your danger ; and inspire you with ardour, confidence, and delight, in the Christian course. In prayer, God will meet you, and commune with you face to face, as a man with his friend. He will lift upon you the light of his reconciled countenance ; w'Al put joy and gladness in your hearts ; and will awaken in you the spirit of thanksgiving and the voice of melody. When you pass through the waters he will be with you ; SER. CXLUI.] PRAYER CONSIDERED. I43 and through the rivers, they shall not overflow you; when you walk through the fire, you shall not be burned, neither shall the flame kin dle on you : for he is the Lord, your God, the Holy One of Israel, your Saviour. In an acceptable time he will hear you, and in a day of salvation will he help you. The mountains will, indeed, depart, and the hills be removed : hut, if you seek him faithfully, his kind ness shall not departfrom you, nor his covenant of peace be remov ed. Seek, then, the Lord, while he maybe found: Call ye uppn him, while he is near. ' When you call, he will answer ; and when you cry unto him, he will say. Here lam. SERMON CXLIV. THE ORDINARY MEANS OF GRACE. FORMS OF FRAYER. Matthew vi. 9^13. — After this manner, therefore, pray ye. Our Father, which art in heaven ; Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be dont in earth, as it is in heaven. Give -us this day our daily bread. .Snd forgive us our d'ebls, as we forgive our debtors. And lead us not into temptation j but deliver ¦us from evil. For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen. In the preceding discourse I finished the observations, which I thought it necessary to inake concerning the Nature, and Seasons, of Prayer ; the Obligations to pray ; the Usefulness of prayer ; the Encouragements to it ; and the Objections against it. The next subject, which claims our attention in a system of Theology, is Forms of Prayer. In the first verse of the text, our Saviour directs us to pray; af ter the manner, begun in that verse, and continued through those zuhich follow. There are two modes, in which this direction may be underslo'od. The first is, that this is a form of prayer, pre scribed to us ; a form, whichj therefore, we are required to use, when we approach to God in this solemn service. Hence it has been considered as a strong proof, that we are required to use a 'form of prayer, at least in the public worship of God ; if not in that which is private. Even the candid and enhghtened Pa/cy says, " The Lord's prayer is a precedent, as well as a pattern, for forms of prayer. Our Lord appears, if not to have prescribed, at least to have authorized, the use of fixed forms, when he complied with the request of a disciple, who said unto him. Lord, teach us to pray, as John also taught his- disciples," Luke xi. 1. The other mode of construing this direction is this. Christ is supposed to have taught, here, those subjects of prayer, which on all occasions are its proper subjects ; the Spirit, with which we are to pray, und ihe simplicity of Style and Manner, with which our thoughts are to be clothed, zuhen we are employed in this duty. That our Saviour is not, here, to be considered as prescribing a form of prayer to his followers, seems not improbable from a com parison of the text wilh the context. In the context he directs us not to do out alms before men, but in secret ; when we pray, to en ter into our closets ; when we fast, not to be of a sad countenance, that we may not appear unto men to fast ; and not to lay up for ourselves treasures upon earth, Norie of these passages is, I ap prehend, to be understood in the absolute, or literal sense. We SER. CXLIV.] FORftIS OF PRAYER. 145 may give alms before others. Il is our duty to give bread to a starving man in the sight of our families. Nay, it is often our du ty to tohtribute publicly to public charities. We are vvarranted, and required, to pray, an^ to fast, before otters ; and command ed to provide far our own, especially for those of our own house holds. As none of these assertions -will be disp\ited ; they de- n^and no proof. I shall only observe therefore, that the object of our Saviour in these precepts, was to forbid ostentation, and cov etousness ; and to establish a sincere, humble, self-denying temper in our minds. ,, As tbese directions, which are unambiguously expressed, are evidently not to be construed in the literal sense ; tbere is no small reason, from analogy, to believe, that the directjon in the text, which is plainly ambiguous, and indefinite, ought also not be construed in this manner. There is, to say the least, as little reason to suppose, that our Saviour has here directed us to pse this form of prayer, as that he has required us fo da alms, pray, and fast, only in secret ; and not to lay up property for the exi gencies of a future day. This presumption is, 1 think, phanged into a certainty by the following arguments. I . According to this scheme, we are required always to use this form, and no other. The words. After this manner pray ye, if understood literally, plainly require, that we always pray in this raanner ; and therefore, in no other. If they require us to use this forra ; they require us always to use it. But this will not be adraitted by those who hold the opinion, against which I contend. 2. When our Saviour gives directions to his disciples, at another time, io pray after ihis manner ; he uses several variations from the form, which is here given. In Luke xi. 2, &c. our Saviour recites, iri substance, the form of prayer, which is:contained in the text ; and adopts no less than ten variations. These, He, who is the same yesterday, to-day, and foi ever, adopted unquestionably wilh design. Of this design, it was not improbably a part to teach us, that mere words are matters of such indifference, as at any time to be altered, with propriety, in whatever manner the occasion may require. One of the variations, used by our Saviour in this place, is the omission of the doxology.' I am aware, that this is also omitted by ?i considerable number of manuscripts, in the text. But the a,uthority for the admission of it is such, as to have deterriiined in its fiivour almost all critics, and given it a place, so far as Iknow, in almost every -Bible. It is, therefore, to be considered as a gen uine pa,rt of this prayer of our Saviour. This shows, that the substctnce even of this, prayer may without impropriety be varied, in one part, or another ; as the particular occasion may demand, or allow. ' Vol. IV, • 19 146 FORMS OF PRAYER. [SER. CXLIV. 3. The petitions, here recited, are not presented in the Name of Christ. But om- Saviour says, John xvi. 23, 24, 26,' Verily, verily, I say unto you, whatever ye shall ask the Father in my name, he will give it you. Hitherto have ye asked nothing- in my name. Ask, and ye shall receive, that your joy may be full. At that day ye shqll ask in my name. St. Paulalso, in Col. iii. 17. says. Whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name ofthe Lord Jesus, giving thariks tqt0od, even the Father, by him. This prayer, therefore, is de- feaive in one particular, which Christ and St. Paul haye; in these passages, made csSential to the acceptableness of our prayers. 4. Christ himself does not appear to have used thi^prayer. We have several prayers of Christ recorded. All of these are such as plainly arose out of the occasion, on which they were offer ed up. They were in the strictest sense, extemporaneous : the mere effusions of his heart concerning the subjects by which they -were prompted. So far, then, as the example of Christ may be supposed to bear upon this question, it is unfavourable to the sup position, that we are obliged lo use this form ; and favourable to the use of extemporaneous prayer. 5. The Apostles do not appear ever to have used this prayer. There are many prayers of the Apostles recorded. All these were extemporaneous, like those of Christ, and the Prophets vvho went before him ; and sprang out of the occasion^ If it be ad mitted that the Apostles are here an exaraple to us ; it will follow, that our own prayers raay, to say the least, be with the strictest propriety, extemporaneous ; arid grow out of that state of facts, by which we have been induced to pray. A full proof, also, is furnished here, that the Apostles did not consider this form as ob ligatory on themselves. 6. This prayer contains no expressions of thanksgiving, St. Paul, in Phil. iv. 6. says. Be careful for nothing ; but in every thing, hy prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known unto God,- A similar injunction is recorded 1 Tim, ii. 1, From both these it is evident, that St. Paul corisidpred thanksgiving as universally, and essentially, a part of prayer. Had he considered this form as obligatory, on himself, or upon Christians in gefteral ; or had Christians in general so considered the subject at that time ; he must, I think, have added a form of thanksgiving, as a supplement to this prayer ; and not left them to express their thanksgivings exteniporanebusly in their own words. There is no perceptible reason,' why Christians should utter thanksgivings extemporaneously, in words of their own, rather than adorations, petitions, or confessions for sin. If the Spirit of Inspiration thought proper to. prescribe a form to us, in which we were required to present our petitions ; it is reasonably believed, that he would also prescribe to us a form, in which the other parts, also, of this devotion were to be uttered. SER. CXLIV.] FORMS OF PRAYER. 147 7. St. Paul refutes this supposition, when he requires us To pray always with all prayer, Eph.vi. 18. From the prayers, recorded in the Scriptures, of the ancient Saints, of Christ, and his Apostles, vve know, that there is much prayer, which, unless by very distant implication, cannot be said to be contained in this form. In the sentence, which contains this precept of St, Paul, he directs the Ephesians to pray, that Utter ance might be given unto him ; and that he might open his mouth boldly, to make known the mystery ofthe Gospel, It will hardly be pretended, that this request is clearly contained in the Lord's Prayer. The same thing is true of a vast multitude of other prayers, found in the Scriptures. The truth plainly is, that the prayers, contained in this Sacred Book, almost universally sprang from particular occasions ; are exactly such, as suited those oc casions, the natural effusions of the heart, contemplating thefr na ture, and feeling their importance. This fact effectually teaches us what it is to pray always with all prayer : viz. what 1 formerly explained it to be : To pray, on every proper occasion, with prayer suited to that occasion. But this cannot be accomplished, unless we pray, often at least, without a form, and in the extemporaneous manner. These arguments, if I mistake not, prove, that the Lord's prayer was not prescribed to Christians as a form, which they were in tended, or required, to adopt. That it may be used, both lawful ly and profitably, at various times, both in public and private ; and that it may be very often thus used ; I entertain not a single doubt. The question concerning forms of prayer is now become a ques tion of mere expediency. If the Lord''s prayer is not enjoined up on us ; it is certain, that no other form of prayer can lay the least claim to such an injunction. It is well known, that various sects of Christian* are attached to forms of prayer in the public worship of God, and soraetimes even in private worship. Such forms are prescribed by them as dfrec- tories of public worship : and all those, who belong to their com munion, are requfred to worship in this manner. Every objection to extemporaneous prayer is considered, and 1 think justly, by these Christians, as evidence ofthe advantages of a Liturgy ; and may, without any inconvenience, and without any discrimination, be blended with the positive arguraents in favour of worshipping by a form. I shall, therefore, blend thenr in the following exami nation. These arguments I'consider as collected by Dr. Paley, so far as they have any force. I shall, therefore, follow this re spectable Writer in this discussion. In behalf of forms of prayer, as directories of public worhip, it is pleaded, ' 1. That the use of them prevents fhe use of improper prayers : such particularly, as are absurd, extravagant, or impious. 148 FORMS OF PRAYER. I^SER. CXLIV. " These," says Dr, Paley, " in an order of men, so numerous as the Sacerdotal, the folly and enthusiasm of many miist always bc in danger of producing, where the conduct of the pubhc wor ship is entrusted without restraint, or assistance, to the discretion, and abilities of the officiating minister." To the argument, here alleged, I reply,. That this complaint has been originated by those who have used Liturgies ; and not by those who have worshipped with extemporaneous prayer. Yet these persons are incomparably more interested to complain ; because, if the, evil exists, they, and they only, suffer by it. At the same time, they are also the only proper judges, as being the only per sons, who have sufficient experience of this evil, or the want of a Liturgy, to enable thera to judge. The allegation was invented, therefore, to justify the use of a Liturgy, already adopted ; and not admitted as a proof of the necessity of worshipping by a Liturgy ; and as a truth, forced upon the conviction Of men by the existence of the evil, which in this case it would be intended to remedy. Facts are often discordant with theories ; and often refute them. Such, I apprehend, is the truth in the present case. In the vast multitude of Christian congregations, who, in Switzerland, protes- tant France, Germa-ivy, Ireland, ¦dnd America ; in Holland, England, and Scotland; worship without a form, no material difficulty of this nature has ever been perceived. Within the many millions of mankind, who for Centuries have worshipped in this manner, there has certainly been a sufficient number of enlightened men, a suffi cient length of time, and a sufficient variety of character and circum stances, to have presented, and to have fell, this evil, if it has actual ly existed, in every manner, and degree, in which it is capable of ex isting. Yet no complaint has ever pt-evailed, to any extent; in any prolestant age, or country, among those who have worshipped without forms of prayer.. It will not be pretended, that, among thfese persons, religion, in the proper sense, has not had as extensive 'and nappy influence, as it has had, during the same period, ainongarty of the human race. That there have been solitary, instances of this nature, T readi ly admit. But that they have been sufficiently numerous to fur nish ground for this allegation, cannot be seriously maintained, for a moment, by any man, who considers this fact with caridouror even with sober attention. 1 speak not, here, of the performances pf ignorant men, who thrust themselves into the, desk without right, propriety, or- even decency ; "nor of those, who, without any appearance of piety, are admitted into the Church, merely because they are (in the language of Dr, Paley) "desceridarits of large families,"^ and' for the purpose of furnishing them with easy means of Subsistence : men who, as this Writer says, are "no farther Ministei-s of Reli gion, than as a cockade makes a soldier." From the former of these classes, extravagant addresses to God ; from the latter, suph SKR. CXLIV.] FORMS OF I'R.VVER. ]4;> as are impious ; and frbm both, such as arc absurd ; may indeed bc expected. But the existence of such persons in the desk, al though an indelible reproach to those, who are bound to lay hands suddenly on no man, and to all, vvho voluntai-ily attend the ministry of these persons, infers no objection against extemporaneous prayer. Among the men, vvho are educated, and morally qualified, for the minisfry, too few vvill always be found guilty of this conduct to furnish any serious argument in favour of a Liturgy. While among so m-any, and so discreel, Christians, vvho, tlux)ugh many ages, and in many countries, havc worshipped in Uiis manner, no difficulty of this kind has ever been seriously felt ; thc objection is plainly imaginary. Prayer is, of all kinds of discourse, that which least demands elegance of style. Every professed ornament it rejects with dis dain. Thc simplest, plainest, and least artificial manner of utter ing his thoughts, alone becomes the character of -a suppliant, or the occasion and design of his supplication. He, who feels in cUned to pray, vvill loath all critical phi-aseology in his prayers. Decency, every where demanded, is indispensable in tlie worship of God : but, beyond this, nothing is necessai-y in our prayers, be side humility, faitlifulness, and fervour. But decency is easily at tainable by men of moderate talents, without thc aid of a supe rior education. Plain men, as is not unfrequently seen both in private and public religious assemblies, pray with miich propriety, and with no small edification to their fellow-Christians. He, who has universally madc prayer a prime duty of man, has qualified man for tiie performance of this duty ; and, as' 1 apprehend, much more happily than this objection supposes. 2. It is objected also, that extemporaneous prayer must be at tended with confusion in thc mind of the hearer. The ignorance of each petition before it is heard ; the want of time to join in it after it is heard ; tiic necessary suspension of devotion until it is concluded ; the necessity of attending to what succeeds ; thc detention of thc mind from its proper busi ness by the very novelty, wiUi vvhich it is gratified ; form, to gethei-, the sources of diis confusion ; and furnish, in the view of Dr. Paley, a fundamental objection against extempoi-ary prayer, even where die minister's office is discharged wim every possi ble advantage, and accomplishment. Concerning Uiis objection, I sbserve, Fii-st, That it attaches a gross, and fimdammtal impropriety to ihcjprayers of inspired men, mentioned in the Scriptures. The prayer of Solomon, at the dedication of tive Temple, was, I think, unquestionably intended to awaken tlie spirit of devotion in the great assembly, before which it was uttered ; and to be come the vehicle ot their own supplications. But tiiis design was impracticable on that occasion, and witiv respect to that as sembly, as truly, and as extensively, as with i-espect to any mod- 150 FORMS OF PRAYER. [SER. CXLIV. ei-n congregation of Christians, There are many instances, also, in which the Apostles, and their fellow-Christians, assembled for prayer. The prayers, actually uttered on these occasions, were, I think, with a degree of probability next to certainty, extempo rary. The persons, who heard them, could no better tell the import of each petition, before they heard it, than modern Christian asserabhes. Their devotion was as much suspended, until a peti tion was concluded. They were as much held in continual expec tation; were detained as much from their proper business of join ing in prayer ; and were, in all other respects, subjected to as many disadvantages. The unavoidable conclusion from these premises is, that the Apostles prayed in a manner, unfitted for the purposes of devotion, unedifying to those with whoni they prayed, and of course unapproved by the Spirit of God. This conclusion no objector will admit. But if an objector refuse fo admit the conclusion; he must, I think, give up the premises. If raen could profitably unite in extemporary prayer, in the days of Solomon, or in the days of the Apostles, they can do it now.Secondly. The same objection lies with equal force, to a great extent, against the union, which the objectors themselves suppose to exist, and will acknowledge to be absolutely necessary, in other parts of religious worship, A considerable number of persons, from perhaps one half to seven-eighths of the whole number, usually gathered in religious assemblies, are, throughout almost all Christian Countries, unable to read. Of these" it may be properly observed, here, that, from the confused manner, in which the responses in a Liturgy will ev er be read by a numerous and mixed assembly, they must very imperfectly hear, and understand, this part of the prayers. That, which they gain by hearing, however, is all which they gain. All these, unless they learn the prayers by heart, a fact, which, il is presumed, rarely happens, raust be in a rauch less favourable situation, in some respects,, and better situated in none, than when they are present at extemporary prayers. , Equally unable arejhese persons to reaj Psa/w*. If men can not join in the prayers, uttered by a minister, it will be difficult to show how they can unite ih the praises, sung by a choir. My audience well know, that hearing the word of God is-, in my own view, a part, and a very solemn and important part, of public worship. To receive divine truth, and divine precepts, as being really divine, with reverence, faith, and love, is an ordinance as truly appointed by God, and as acceptable means of. honouring him, as prayer, or praise, To hear wilh any adv.antage, it is ne cessary, that we should both understand, and feel, what we hear. \n order iounderstand,it'\s indispensable, that we examine every thing, uttered by the Preacher, which is not absolutely obvious, with a momentary investigation erriployed upon each of his asser- SER. CXLIV] FORMS OF PRAYER. 151 tions. In order to feel, it is equally necessary, that a little longer time should be spent upon every part of a discourse, which is fitted •to awaken feeling. The time, necessary for both these acts of the mind, must, at l§ast, be equal to that, which is demanded for such union in prayer, as vvill make the several petitions our own. But all the confusion, suspense, detention, and embarrassment from novelty, will here have as much influence to prevent us fi-om hear ing a Sermon, in a proper manner, as from joining in extemporary prayer. Here, also, the labouring recollection, and embarrassed, or tumultuous delivery, of which Dr, Paley complains, will have their full effect. Most men, unless when destitute of self-posses sion, speak extemporaneously, with more distinctness and pro priety, than they read ; and are, therefore, more readily, and perfectly, understood. But if an audience do not understand, and feel, a sermon, they fail as effectually of performing this part of religious worship, as of performing the duty of prayer, when they do not join in the petitions. The same difficulties, therefore, attend, thus far, tiie performance of both these relig ious services, vvhich are here supposed to attend extemporary prayer. It is presumed, however, that they are iraaginary in both cases : for. Thirdly. The answer to the former objection is applicable, with the same force,^ to this : viz. That the difficulties, complained of, have never existed in such a manner, as to be of serious importance, in the view of those who have worshipped, pmblicly, with extempora ry prayer. In the long periods throughout which, and among the numerous milhons by whom, this mode of worsbip has been adopted, no complaint of any magnitude has ever arisen concerning this sub ject. It will not be asserted, and vvith decency cannot, that these persons have been less serious, less scrupulous about their worship, or less anxious to perform the duties of religion aright, than an equal nuraber of their fellow-christians. Experience, therefore, is wholly against both of these objections ; and experience is the only evidence, or umpire, in the case. The advocates for forms of prayer admit, that they are attended by some disadvantages. Among these. Dr. Paley considers the two following as the principal. 1. That forms of prayer, composed in one age, become unfit for another, hy ihe unavoidable change of language, circumstances, and opinions. This objection must, doubtless, be allowed to have some de gree of force. I do not, however, think it necessarily of very serious importance. To make frequent alterations in so solemn a service vvould, certainly, be dangerous. Nor ought they ever to be made without extrerae caution. Yet vvhen they are plainly de manded by existing circumstances, it can hardly be supposed, that a collection of Christians would refuse their consent to safe 152 FORMS OF PRAYER. [SER. CXLIV- and reasonable changes : especially after the evil had become considerable. 2. That the perpetual repetition of the same form of words pro duces weariness, and inattentiveness, in the congregation. This I esteem a more serious difficulty than the former ; so far as such a repetition exists : while I readily acknowledge, that its ex istence ajapears to me unnecessary. For this evil, Dr. Paley ob serves, " Devotion may supply a remedy." I admit that it may j and doubt not that in individual minds it does ; at least in a con siderable measure. Still the objection is far from being removed. Every mode of Worship ought to be so formed, as to awaken devo tion, a.lways too languid ; and not so as to diminish a_^ame, which is scarcely perceptible. It is the nature of all repetition; as well as of coritinued sameness, soon to weary minds, formed, fike ours, with an inherent love of change and novelty. This, in every other case, is perceived, and acknowledged. No reason appears, why it should not be acknowledged in this. Devotion easily languishes in the most pious minds ; and ought therefore to be assisted, not repressed. The best men complain often, and justly, of lukewarm affections, and wandering thoughts. What, then, shall be said of others ? Certainly the fervour of devotion, referred to, must be un safely relied on, to remedy the evils of a wearisome service in the minds of a congregation at large. ' To obviate the force of these remarks, it raay be said, that psalras and hymns are sung in frequent repetition. I reply, that these are rarely repeated, when compared vvith repetitions in forms of prayer. Yet even these, when sung several times within a short period, becorae obviously tiresome. But besides that, the psalms are given us in Scripture, and are therefore regarded vvith a reverence, which can be claimed by no huraan composition. Both psalms.and hymns are always sung; and are, therefore, recommended to the hearer by the powerful ^'d of music. This is an advantage, which nothing else can boast ; and counterbalances whatever tediousness would otherwise be found in any necessary or proper repetition. These, therefore, may be fair ly laid aside, as being without the debate. 3. To these objections ought to be added another ; That the Mode of uttering iheforrhs of prayer, in actual use, is unhappy. This mode, as is well known, is the audible union of a whole Congregation in reading each prayer, throughout a considerable part of the service. The effect of this practice, so far as I can judge from my own experience, is, in a greater or less degree, to dis turb the attention, and confound the thoughts, of the several sup phants. How far the power of habit may go towards lessening, or removing, these evils, it is impossible for me, without more ex perience ofthe effects of this mode of worship, to judge. But, in- dependentiy of this consideration, so many voices, set by nature to so many different keys, and directed in so many different SER. CXLIV.] FORMS OF PRAYER. I53 mfthpds. of modulation, are certainly an embarrassment of that quietness and steadiness of thought, that entire self-possession, so desirable during the time of religious worship. Sounds, which are very numerous, are, wheh uttered at the same moment, almost of course perplexing^ Discordant sounds are necessarily unpleasant : and no circumstances can previent this effect on the mind. 4. Forms of prayer must necessarily be General : whereas the na ture of prayer demands, that :our petitions should in a great measure be particular. It is no part of the design of prayer to change the purposes, or coriduct of .the Creator. Its whole import consists in exciting our obedience to him, and the amendment of ourselves. By aw?ikening in our minds a sense of our guilt, dangers, necessities, helplessness, dependence, and indebtedness ; of our own httle- ness, and the greatness, wisdom, and goodness, ,of our Maker ; we are improved in our moral character, and fitted to receive the blessings, which we need. The more these emotions are excited, the more effectually are these ends accomplished. Of course, the most advantageous means should always be used for this prirpose. Hence it will be easily seen, that prayer ought, as far as may be, to consist of petitions, confessions, thanksgiving, and adoration, formed in particular, not in general, thoughts and expressions. General declarations, and images, of all kinds, except when em inently important, are feeble and unimpressive. Particular ones, on the contrary, are deeply, and alone, impressive. Whenever the end df what wc speak, or write, is to interest either the imagination, pr the heart ; it is a rule of every Rheto rical writer, and ordinarily the practice of every man who follows nature, to use particular images and expressions. No reason ap pears, why this rule, founded in the native character of man, may not be apphed to the present case vvith the same propriety as to any other. The principal end of prayer is, not to teach, but io move, the heart. The raore this rule is followed, the more will the end be attained. In all the warrantable means of quickening the affec tions, prayer ought plainly lo abound. Both the sentiments, and language, ought to be simple, artiess, apparently the result of no labour, derived frora the occasion, and springing directly from the beart. To this scheme, the confessions, petitions, and thanksgivings, should, 1 think, be generally conformed, wherever it is intended to be made deeply impressive. This is a purpose, vvhich no form of prayer, however admiraljjly composed, can successfully accomplish. Designed for so many persons, occasions, and ages, it must of necessity be, to a great extent, general ; and so far defective. The mind, deeply inter ested by the occasion, must be disappointed of what it naturally expects ; and displeased, when it finds the strain of sentiment fall ing short of' its own feelings. In this degree, therefore, it will fai! Vol. IV. 20 154 FORMS OF PRAYER. [SER. CXLIV, of being edified. The emotions which it wishes to haye, excited, and which the occasion demands, and awakens, are either faintly excited, or suffered to sleep. If persons accustomed to the use of a Liturgy find, as they think, those difficulties in extemporary prayer, which are alleged by Dr. Paley ; such, as are accustomed to prayer of this nature, complain with not less feeling, and as they apprehehd with not less reason, of the general, unimpressive char acter of forms ; and their want of a perceptible adaptation to the particular circumstances of the suppliants. Almost every prayer, recorded in the Scriptures, sprarig.out of the case which prompted it ; and expresses its part^ular, itnpor- tant, and most affecting circumstances. Such are Abraharrfs for Ishmael, Gen. xvii. ; Abraham's for Sodom, Gen. xviii. ; Lot's for himself. Gen. xix. ; Isaac's for Jacob and Esau, Gen. xxvii.; Jacobs for himself. Gen. xxviii. ; Thoseof jtfbses forlsrael, Expd. xxxii. and xxxiii. ; Gideon's, Judges vi. ; Samson's, Judges xvi. ; Hannah's, iSam. ii.; David's, 2 Sam. vii. ; So/oOTon's,lKings viii. ; Jehoshaphat'' s for Judah, 2 Chron. xx.; Hezekiah'' s forlsrael, 2 Kings xix. ; Heze- kiah's for himself, 2 Kings xx. ; Ezra's for Judah, Ezra ix. ; the prayer of the Levites for Judah, Neh. ix. ; those of Jeremiah and Daniel; that of Josiah ; those recorded of Christ ; and those re corded of the Apostles. In all these, and several other instances ; particularly, raany contained in the Psalras ; the prayer is chiefly directed to the oc casion in hand, whether a public or private one : for it is to be remembered, that several of them were prayers of the most public nature ; and although uttered chiefly by individuals, were uttered in the midst of great assemblies, and offered up in their name. Nor is there, so far as I remember, a single prayer recorded inthe Scriptures, (the text being here laid out of the question) which has at all the aspect of having been a form, or a part of a standing Liturgy. From these observations, it will be seen, that prayer is no other than the thoughts of a devotional raind, ascending silently to God, or audibly expressed. What these thoughts are in the mind, the prayer ofthe voice ought ever to be. Hence, as the thoughts will vary, so the prayer will also vary, according to the numberless cases of suppliants ; the cares, wants, fears, distresses, supplies, hopes, and joys. In this manner, the Prophets, Apostles, and our' Saviour himself, prayed. Thus the Spirit of God directed those, who alone were under his express direction. WhatevenVi^rm/ft'es we, who are uninspired, may labour under, the same Spirit may ^th humble confidence be expected to help, so far as shall be ne cessary for us,, as he helped theirs. Their example he has record ed both for our instruction and encourageraent! As their circum stances gave birth both to their thoughts and expressions ; no rea son appears, why our prayers should not arise also out of our circumstances. The difficulties supposed ter- ceiving, and feeling ; and that of two things, equally understood, one has passed lightly over his mind ; while the other has left a deep impression. A religious man, particularly, -wiir easily re member, that the truths of the Gospel have, at times, barely swept the surface of his mind; and, at others, have powerfully affected his heart. He will easily remember, that the same things, wheth er arguments, images, or motives, have affected him in these widely different manners. If he will bestow a little pains on this subject, he will further remember, that he has often been aston ished at this fact ; and has looked back, to find what mysterious cause prevented him from realizing, at one time, what he so deep ly felt at another. That, and that only, which we feel, rnoves us to iiseful action. What is merely perceived, or understood, scarcely moves us at all. The pipe must be relished, before the dancing will begin. The mourning must be felt, before we shall unite in the lamenta tion. A great proportion of mankind, in Christian countries, be lieve loosely, and generally, the divine origin, and the genuine doctrines, of the Scriptures. But while they thus beheve, they live, and feel, and act, just as if there was no Scriptures. Almost all men believe the existence and government of God. Still they live, as if there were no God-; or as if he exercised no government over the world, or over themselves. Multitudes believe, that Christ is the Saviour of men : and yet never think of applying to him for their own salvation. Religious Meditation is the only method, in which men learn to feel the concerns of religion. In this method, the doctrines, precepts and motives, presented to us in the Scriptures, which are quiedy and carelessly admitted by most men, in Christian countries, and which thus neither amend the life, nor affect the heart, are, when often and deeply poridered, brought home to the soul; set strongly before its view ; apphed to itself ; and felt to be of real and moraentous iraport. In this way, we begin to fear and hope, to mourn and rejoice, to desire and loathe ; and to seek and shun them according to "their respective natures. In this way only do we regard the things of religion with profit to ourselves, and consider them, with an efficacious attention.* In every other ¦ -• ¦ f SEB. CXLVI.} RELIGIOUS MEDITATIO.X. 173 situation of mind, we are settled upon our lees, and instinctively say, The Lord will not do good, neither zuill the Lord do evil. 3. Religious Meditation renders the thoughts and affections, thus gained. Habitual. Nothing in the moral concerns of man is of much importance to him, imtil it is formed into a habit. Every opinion, and every impression, which is fransiently entertained, is entertained to lit tle purpose. If it produce any consequences ; they are momen tary, and useless. In the mean time, other things, of an unhap py tendency, having afready become habitual, and possessing the confrolhng power of habit, return with speed and violence, and drive away the feeble and short-lived influence of such opinions, and impressions. Thus that, which, if continued, might become the glory and beauty ofman, is as ihe fiow er of the grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof faileth away. Habits are forraed only by Repetition. That which is often re peated, becomes, by the mere tendency of nature, more and more interesting and necessary ; and acqufres, therefore, a daily in creasing power over man. After it has continued for a season, and gained a certain degree of strength, it becomes in a sense im moveable ; acqufres a decisive confrol over the conduct ; and is rarely, and not without extreme difficulty, overcome. This influence of habit seems to be inwrought, as a primary characteristic, in the very nature of Intelhgent beings. No other consideration will explain, at least in many situations, the perma nent continuance of either virtue or vice. Under this influence only, does the drunkard resist all motives, and adhere imraoveably to Ws cups ; the idler to his sloth ; the swearer to his profaneness ; the spendthrift to his prodigality ; the thief to his steahng ; and all other sinners to thefr respective iniquities. Under this influence, the mature Christian overcomes the most powerful temptations ; and advances firmly to the rack, or the Jaggot. Under the same influence, will the inhabitants of Hell persist in thefr rebelhon, in spite of all the motives, which so powerfully persuade them to cease from sin. Finally, the Church ofthe first-bom, and the in- nvmerabh company of Angels, will, under the same influence also, persevere in their obedience, whatever temptations may sohcit them to revolt from God. Moral Habits, their sfrength, and thefr consequences, ai-e all produced by a repetition of tiiose things, of which they are con stituted, in the mind. In other words, they are produced by frequent meditation on the several subjects, out of which they are formed, together with a repeated indulgence of the emotions, which such meditation creates. Ultimately, therefore, they, grow out of Rehgious Meditation. Of self-examination, proposed as the second head of discourse, I observe, 1. That it alone makes us acquainted with Ourselves. 174 RELIGIOUS MEDITATION. [SER. CXLVI. Every man has a certain moral character; partly like that pf others, and partly peculiar to himself. This character, in both respects,' is incapable of being known without self-examination. Our own hearts answer, generally, to the hearts of others, as the face to the face in water. By knowing our own hearts only, can we, therefore, know effectually the general character of man. It may, perhaps, be said, that this character is delineated with per fect exactness, and supreme skill, in the scriptures ; and by search ing them may, therefore, be known. The position I admit ; the consequence I deny. The instruction, given us in the Scriptures concerning this subject, will never be understood, uiiless apphed to ourselves in the examination of our own hearts. Invaluable as the knowledge is, which they communicate concerning this sub ject, it is, like all other knowledge, never realized, never made our own, except by meditation. But there are many ihings in' our own characters, which are pe culiar to ourselves. All these exist in tiie heart alone : and there only can they be eiiher taught or learned. Even the very opin ions, which we entertain, together with the manner and degree in which we entertain them, will ever be imperfectly understood by us without this investigation for ourselves. We suppose our selves to embrace many opinions, which, a critical inquiry will show, we have never received. Many others we imagine our selves tohave adraitted without a doubt, which by this frial we shall find regarded by us, only in an uncertain and conjectural manner. Still more ignorant are vve of our dispositions. About no sub ject have the apprehensions of man been more erroneous, than about his will, affections, and propensities. Self-Knowledge, in this respect chiefly, has been proverbially acknowledged to be ex tremely difficult, as well as highly important. Hence the merao rable observation. Id, yvu^i rfEaurov, e coelo descendit : an observa tion, grounded, perhaps, equally on the usefulness, and the difficul ties, of the precept. Whatever raan can accomphsh in this ardu ous concern raust be accoraplished by self-examination. He must watch carefully every movement of his disposition ; the commence ment, and the progress, of every affection, aira, resolution, and habit; the manner, in which every thing affects him ; and the, means, by which -he is affected ; the causes of his success, and his failures, in regulating the state of his mind; and, generally; all his move ments within, and all his impulses from without. ' In this way, and in this aloiie, can the sinner learn effectually, that he is a sinner. In this way only, vvill he discern the nature, and extent, of his guilt ; the strength of his evil propensities ; the obstinacy of his, unbelief, and impenitence ; the uniformity of his disobedience; the cpmpleteness-of his'ruin ; his exposure to final condemnation ; and his utter indisposition to return to God. All these things he learns only, and effectually, by observing them, as SER.CXLVL] RELIGIOUS MEDITATION. 175 they exist, and operate, in himself ; or arise,, as consequences, from the state of his own mind." Whatever knowledge he may possess of them from instruction, even from that of the Scriptures ; it can never be of any serious use to hira, until he has made it his own by an investigation of his heart, and life. Whatever he may have heard, or read, of sin, and guilt, and danger ; it is, to him, merely news concerning other men ; not knowledge of hiraself. Other raen, according to the views, which he entertains before he commences the examination of himself, are sinners, odious to God, children of wrath, and in danger of perdition. But for himself, he is almost innocent, and perhaps entirely safe. . Should you prove the contrary to him, by arguments, which he will acknowl edge to be unanswerable ; you have gained nothing. The appli cation to himself will still be wanting : and the story might almost as well have been told to another person, or communicated in an unknown tongue. In the same manner only, does the Christian learn, that he is a Christian. To decide this great point, even hopefully, his heart and his life must pass before him in continual review. The doc trines, by which he is governed, the affections which he exercises, the actions which he performs, and the views with vvhich they are performed, must be daily scrutinized : and from them all must be derived the momentous result. Without this diligent investigation of himself, no man, however long, or however eminently, he has possessed the Christian character, can, even wilh well-founded hope, conclude that he is a Christian. In the sarae manner, also, must every question, which we ask concerning our moral charac ter, be answered. Unless we thus explore ourselves, whatever may be our state, we cannot understand it; and shall on the one hand, be exposed to all its evils, and lose on the other, no small part of its blessings. 2. Self-examination naturally prepares men lo turn from sin to holiness, and to advance from one degree of holiness to another. Conviction of sin is eminentiy the result of self-examination : as, I think, must already be evident to a very moderate attention. Equal ly applicable is this remark lo all apprehensions concerning our fu ture destiny ; all efficacious fears concerning the ariger bf God.;. all affecting views of our helplessness ; all thorough convictions of the necessity of betaking ourselves to Christ for salvation. They, that are whole, need not a physician. But all are whole, in the sense intended by our Saviour, until convinced of their dis eased Condition by Solemnly attending to thefr own case. So long as this is not done, there Will be no recourse to the Physician of the soul. Two objections, or at least two difficulties, may here, perhaps, arise in the minds of my audience. One is, that the effect, which I have attributed to self-examination, is 'to be attributed to the Spirit of Grace. The other is, that I have elsewhere attributed the same 176 RELIGIOUS MEDITATION. [SER. CXLVI effect to Prayer. On the former I observe, that the Spirit of Grace operates on the mind, in this state of its moral concerns, chiefly by leading it to a solemn investigation of itself. On the latter, i observe, that Prayer has. this efficacy in the manner, recited in a former discourse, principally by prompting- us to examine our selves more effectually, than any other exercise of the mind, and more thoroughly to explore our moral condition. Self-examina tion is the primary'mean, by which the Spirit of God brings the soul into this state. This glorious Agent can, I acknowledge, ac complish this work in any other manner, which he shall choose. But this seems plainly lo be the raanner, in which it is usually ac complished. Indeed it seems difficult to conceive how convictions of sin, whatever might be their cause, could exist, at least to any extent, without self-examination. To such convictions it seems absolutely necessary, that the soul should know its own guilt : and to this knowledge it seems equally indispensable, that it should ex plore its own moral character and conduct. Of prayer it may be truly said, that its nature is very imper fectly understood by him; who does not know that, to a considera ble extent, it is employed in the most solemn, the most intimate, and the most effectual, examination of ourselves. The advan tages, which prayer furnishes for this employment, are singular and supreme. But no- man will ever avail himself of them, who does not more or less occupy- the intervals between the seasons of prayer, in communing diligently with his own heart. It wasjn this view of prayer, that I exhibited it as contributing so efficaciously to a solemn conviction of his guilt in the mind of the sinner. - Noi- is this eraployraent less effectual in enabling, us to advance from one degree of grace: to another. To do this, the Christian must know his present and past condition ; that he may renounce whatever is amiss, and retain whatever is coramendable. Unless he khow his sins, bow can he renounce them ? Unless he knovv his weaknesses, how can he guard against thera ? Unless he perceive the raeans of his success in past cases, hpw can he adppt them ..again ? Unless he discern the causes of former failures^how can he be safe frora future ones ? If he have no acquaintance with his backshdings, how can he either repent, or reforra ? If he be.igno- rant of the means, by which he has heretofore improved in holi ness, how can he be enabled to improve hereafter ? Thus the most important conduct of man, as a moral being, is eminently de pendent onthe investigation of himself. From self-examination, also, spring, in a great measure, all our resolutions of araendraent. .. The seasons, in which,-by looking in to ourselves, we learn our guilt, our danger, and the indispensable necessity of an alteration in our lives, are those, in which the mind exerts -itself, in earnest, to accomplish such alteration. In this situation alone, are resolutions made, of sufficient strength, and solemnity, materially to affect the life. To resolve firmly against SEB. CXLVI.] BELIGIOUS MEDITATION. I77 any evil, we must feel it. To resolve with efficacy on the pursuit of any good, we must realize, that in an important sense it is good tons. Finally ; some of the most affecting views of the Divine charac ter grow out of this employment. God is never seen in the mpst interesting manner, except when seen in relation to ourselves. Whether we regard his haired of sin, and his determinations to ex ecute vengeance on the impenitent; or his boundless goodness in forgiving, redeeming, and sanctifying mankind ; we see these things in a far clearer light, and feel them with far greater strength, as exercised directly about ourselves, than as employed about oth ers. When we come to discern our own sins, their guilt, and their aggravations, we first begin to form proper views of the awful justice of God in our condemnation. At the same tim^, the ffrst sound and affecting apprehensions, whicb we entertain of the goodness of God, are awakened by a strong sense of our own need of his mercy, and a humble hope of our own interest in his forgiv ing love. The omnipresence of God is then only reahzed, when we con sider hira as present with ourselves ; as dwelling with us, and around us. The Omniscience of God is never brought to the view of the mind, until it regards him as exploring its own re cesses, tracing all its secret windings, and accompanying itself with his all-seeing eye, while employed in unravelling the myste ries of its own iniquity. Generally, God is seen, and realized, in our religious meditations, particularly in those which are directed to our own hearts, to be a vastly different Being from that, which we imagine for ourselves in loose contemplation, and lukewarm inquiry. From these observations it is evident, that Religious Meditation is not only the effect, but the cause also, of that soberness of mind, exhibited in the Scriptures as indispensably necessary to sound wisdom. Of this character, it scarcely needs to be observed, the benefits are numberless, and surpassing estiraation. 3. Self-examination is a principal source of Self-government, and, therefore, of Peace of mind, and solid Enjoyment. On the knowledge of ourselves, obtained in this raanner only : the knowledge pf our iraperfections, passions, appetifes, sins, temptations, and dangers ; and an acquaintance with such means, as we possess, of strength, encourageraent, and safety ; our self- government almost entirely depends. In acquiring the knowledge of these things, we both learn how to govern ourselves, and grad ually obtain an earnest and fixed desire to perform this duty. Without self-examination there can be little self-government : without self-government there can be no peace of mind. Peace of mind is the result only of a consciousness of having done our duly. But of this duty self-government is one of the three great Vol. IV. / 23 178 RELIGIOUS MEDITATION. [SEB. CXLV L branches : the other two being piety to God, and beneficence to mankind. These can never be separately performed. Evangeli cal virlue, the only spirit, vvith which either was ever truly per formed, is a thing perfectly one ; without any variety, or division, in its nature. Towards all the objects of our duty, whether God, oiir neighbour; or ourselves, it operates in the same manner. Besides, self-government is indispensable, in its very nature, to the performance of all other duty. This might be evinced with respect to every case, in which duty can be performed ; but may be sufficiently illustrated in the following. If we do not control our envy, wrath, or revenge ; we cannot be contented, meek, or forgiving. If we do not subdue our selfishness ; we can never, in the sense of the Gospel, love either God, or raankind. But, without recurrence to these proofs, the case is perfectly plain in its Qwn nature. In the. experience of every man it is abundantly evident, that, so long as his passions and appetites are unsubdued, they keep the mind in a continual agitation. The ap petites are syrens, which sing, only to deceive ; and charm, only to destroy. He, who listens to them, is certain of being shipwreck ed in the end. The passions are equally dangerous; equally fatal, by their violence ; and toss the soul with tempestuous fury ori bil lows which never rest. Without a pilot, without a compass, with out a helm, no hope of safety remains for the unhappy voyager, but in the hushing of the storm, and the subsidence of the tumultu ous ocean. Ungoverned desire, and fear, and rage, and revenge, dwell only Jn the gloom of a dungeon, and in the midst of, maniacs. Into such a cell it is impossible for soft-eyed,, gentle-minded, peace even to enter. From such companions she can only fly. These unclean spirits must be subdued, and chained, and banished ; their curses and blasphemies must have died upon the ear; the vvindows of their mansion must be opened to the hght of day ; the house must be swept and garnished anew ; before this divine guest can be induced to bless the habitation with her presence, her smiles, and her joys. But without peace of conscience, there is, there can be, no solid, rational, lasting enjoyment. Real and enduring good must begin at home. The soul, which is not self-approved,' can never hope for the approbation of God. The soul, which is not at peace with itself, cannot be at peaee with its. Maker; nor exercise a pacific spirit towards its ' fellpw-creatures. What real good, then; can it hope for ? What permanent enjoyment can it possibly share ? ' REMARKS. 1. From these observations il is plain, that Religions Meditation is of high importance to mankind. It has been shown, if I am not deceived, that from this source are derived pur profitable possession of religious instruction, SEB.CXLVI.] RELIGIOUS MEDITATION. I79 whence soever pbtained ; our realizing, useful sense of rehgious things, of every kind; pur attainraent of desirable habits, both of thinking and feelings our knowledge of ourselves; our best pre paration to turn from sin, and to advance through superior degrees of hohness ; and our self-government, peace of mind,, and solid enjoyment. Each of these benefits is sufficiently great to justify the remark, which has been made above : and all of them, united, place Religious Meditation in a light, eminently strong, clear, and affecting. As a mean of salvation it holds a high rank, a place of distinguished importance. Most reasonably, most kindly, then, are we required to prove ourselves, to examine ourselves, whether we be in the faith, obedience, and kingdom, of God. Most merci fully are we directed t "Can you pretend, that Piety is not as rational, and as impor tant to man, as eiiher of the things which you enjpin uppn your children ? If love and reverence to Gpd are not important, no thing is. All good comes from God. When He gives, we enjoy : when He withholds, we are destitute. But he cannot be expected to give ; he certainly will not give; to those, who, finally, neither love nor reverence his character. If he is not believed, nor trusted; he canhot be reverenced, nor loved. Without yai/A, ¦therefore, piety cannot exist. If sin be not hated, jegretted, nor renounced ; or, in other whrds,repented of ; piety will in like man ner be impossible." •- , " Besides, you teach your children, as you. teach others, both wilh - diligence, and ardour, to -disbelieve, despise, and hate the Scriptures, The Scriptures, you know, profess themselves to be a Revelation from God. To the question, whether they are such a Revelation, Chrislia'ns believe the positive, and you 4he nega tive, answer. You will not deny, that .they have the same right to adopt their belief, and their consequent obedience, which you have to adopt your disbelief, and your consequent disobedience. Neither can you dpubt, that he, who believes with the best evi dence, is the wisest man. Their arguments you have utterly fail ed to answer. Fowr objections they claim to have reftited; and can plead this strong proof pf .the justice of their claim, furnish ed by yourselves, that for many years you. have quitted^the field of discussion. On good grounds, therefore, they regard- you as vanquishedi ' In iAis respect, at'least, you must acknowledge, that: they have an .,advanla.ge pver you, which ig infinite. Should the Scriptures prove ip be false, they will lose nothing by believirig ihem. Should they prove to he true, you will gain nothing., and lose your all.''^ j. -'- "The case pf yourselves, and Christian parents,^ is the iiase of your children and theirs. , By teaphingyour children to disbeheve the Scriptures, you expose them to infinite lossj Christians; by teaching their children to believe the Scriptures, do what is in thefr SEB. CXLVU.] OBJECTIONS. 187 power to secure to them infinite gain. You may, therefore, be challenged to Show, that their conduct is not wiser, and more defensible, than yourS." " But it is enough for the present purpose, that you prove your selves insincere in your scheme by pursuing the contrary conduct. You prove rinanswerably, that, in your opinion, children ought diligently to be taught that system of moral principles, which you think good and useful. The conduct, to vvhich you object in Christians, is exactly the same. All, that they teaehy they think good; eminently -good, and infinitely useful." 4. As Virtue is nothing but' Obedience to Truth; so Truth must he taught, before Virtue can be practised. If the former part of this position be admityted ; the latter will be self-evident. As the former cannot be denied, with even a pre tence pf argument; I shall take it for granted, that truth must be taught to children, in order to render them virtuous. But the Re ligion of the Scriptures is the only system of Truth, which will make children virtuous. This I say With confidence-; because no other system of docfrines has ever made men virtuous. Cicero testifies this of the western heathen philosophy. The Brahnvans frankly acknowledge it pf the eastern.*' Every man of common information, knows it to be frue of Infidel Philosophy. If, then, children are to be rendered virtuous while they are chil dren ; that is, while there is ' the best reason to hope that they may become virtuous ; tbey must be educated in the religious system of the Scriptures. - 5. Virtue is a simple indivisible tMng; and must therefore exist, and be taught, entire, or not at all. There never was an instance, in which a' man was possessed of half the character of vfrtue ; orin which he exercised the affections, and voluntarily performed the duties, of virtue towards pne class of pbjects, and not towards another, and towards all. A man may unquestionably be virtuous, and yet not perfectly virtuous >: but it is impossible, that he' should be the subject of piety, and npt of benevolence; or of benevolence, and not of piely. Itis impossi ble, that he shoujd lovtGod, whom he hath not seen, and hate, or not love hisbroiher whorn he hath s'een. It is equally impossible to love our fellow-creatures, ahd not love Him, who made, preserves, and blesses, both us and them. Equally impossible is it, as was shown in the preceding discourse, to love either God or man, with out governing our selfish passions. Thus itis plain, that virtue cannot pxist iri' parcels, or by halves. - . - As virtue cannot exist in this manner; so- it cannot to any pur pose, be taught in this manner. The whole use of teaching is to effectuate the practical end of the~ instructions, which are given. * The;' declare, that in (he present Youge all men are' only sinfuL See Asiat. Research. Maur. Ind. Antiq. and Bapt. Miss. Reports. 188 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION. ¦ [SEB. CXLVJL If these are limited in such a manner, as not to comprise the object in view j they will necessarily fail of their effect. Partial, instruc tions on this subject fall utterly short of teaching what virtue is ; and must therefore be fruitless, Virtue is love to God, love to man kind, and the subordination of all our passions to this great affection. If this be not ta.ught ; nothing is taught, to the purpose in view. The very docfrine, that a part of this is virtue, will, by leading him into a fundamental and fatal error, effectually prevent the child from becoming virtuous. Thus the Christian system alone teaches what virtue is; and leads alone to ,the attainment of this glorious attribute, and the practical obedience of its dictates. If children, then, are not rehgiously'educated ; they will bei. perfectly destitute of all human aid towards- becoming vixtuous. Should they die be fore they arrive at adult years ; they must, if this scheme be pursu ed, die without a hope, . 6, If children are not religiously educated; they will:, instead of being candid, be strongly prejudiced against Christiamty, The professed, intention of those with whom I contend, is to establish candour in the minds pf children, and prevent them from bias and prejudice. This, undoubtedly, wears a fair appearance ; but, like many other specious things, is false and hollpw. Chil dren, by means of the evil propensities, which I have mentioned, are naturally prejudiced ^ga'ii^st every thing, which is morally good,' They are unfriendly to the Scriptures, to Gpd, and to th^r duty; and are prone tq all unbehef, and to all sin. The sin, which they love, and practise, the Scriptures forbid ; and threaten the commission ofit with the most 'awful , penalties. Still they choose to practise it ; and therefore hate the Scriptures, by which i t is thus forbidden and threatened. Thus ,their minds are sponta- neouslyprejudiced against the religion of the Scriptures. If, then, they are not religiously educated ; the very bias, the very want of candour, which the authors of this scheme ^jrofessedly design to preverit, will exist, of course,, in the highest degree; ' Thus the scheme defeats itself 5 and frustrates thp only purpose, for which it is proposed. - > , These truths are obvious in fact; particularly in the conduct of the objectors themselves. Both they and their children are always prejudiced against Christianity. Among all the Infidels, whom I have known, I dp not recollect an indiyidiial, who appeared to me tohave examined thoroughly even the objections of Infidels against the Scriptures^ much less the argutnents. Which have been ad duced by Christians in support pftheif divine origin. I do not remember one, who appeared to hftv-e investigated, with serious attention, the fruth, evidence, or excellence, of the d&qtrines, which they contain. So far as my knpwledge extends, they have all rejected them both in the gross, and without a single earnest inquiry. Such cannot be the conduct either of candour, Or com mon sense, • . SER. CXLVIL] OBJECTIONS. 189 7. Children, however religiously educated, cannot think too favour ably of Christianity ; and in this sense cannot be prejudiced. The Christian system is the only system of moral truth ; and Christianity is the only real virtue. All things, pertaining to life, and to godliness, are revealed in the Scriptures, either expressly, or by plain and necessary implication, Man fias added nothing defensible to what they contain, on the subjects of duty and salva tion, the character of God, or the moral character of himself. Obedience to the law, which they alone publish, is the only virtue ; the only voluntary conformity to the will of God ; the only founda tion of praise and reward. But truth and virtue cannot be loved too intensely : neither can be so highly regarded, as its worth demands. All men estpeuj, andlove, these divine objects, incomparably less than they merit. In the estimation, and affection, of glorified beings, their excellence will rise higher and higher, and their lustre become more bright, beautiful, antj lovely, throughout all eternity. It is impossible for a created being to regard them so highly, as their importance de serves. The martyr, wbo expired on the rack, or perished in the flames, for his attachment to these inestimable objects, gave to their worth the highest testimony in his power. But even his testimony was faint and languid, compared with their inherent glory and beauty. Should the truth of this assertion be questioned ; let it be remembered, that the Son of God became incarnate, and died on the cross, to restore the love of truth, and the exercise of virtue, to the soul of man. Thus the argumenton whicbthis schemeis built, is itself founded on a gross and miserable falsehood ; and a proof of , lamentable ignoranqe concerning the subject in question. Who can estimate truth loo highly, when he remembers, that it is the basis, and the suppqrt, of the divine kingdom ; or yirtue, when he perceives, that it is the object of boupdless complacency, and eternal reward ; when he remembers, especially, that truth and virtue are the beauty and glory of Jehpvah ? , 8. God has expressly commanded men thus to educate their chil dren, ^ ... ^ ¦ The foolishness of God is wiser than men. ,The objector here attributes foolishness to God;' but it is easily seen, that his own arrogated wisdom terminates only ip folly ; that his scheme is idle arid ruinous; and that the argument, on which jt professedly rests, is a mere falsehood. Such, in the end, are, to the eye of sober irivestigation, all the devices of that vain, deceitful philosophy, which men so proudly e.xaltin opposition to divine wisdom. But, were we unable to detect either tbe folly, or the mischief, of this, scheme ; or toevjnee, by arguments pf our own, the wisdom ofthe divine command; still eyejy Christian would find his doubts satisfied, and bis duly clear, in the command itself. Thus saith the Lord, is to him a polesfar, and infallible guide, over the ocean of 190 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION [SEB. CXLVU. doubt. To know, that any thing is the will pf Gpd, is enough. He obeys ; and asks no reasons, to prove his obedience wise and safe. Would he even preserve the character of consistency, he cannot fail to perform' this duty. Religion he esteems infinitely important to himself : can he fail to teach it to his children, that they also may share in so vast a blessing ? Were he to omit this duty, he would sacrifice his children : for he would lose the best opportunity of doing them the greatest good, which is ever to be in big power. But to omit it wholly would be impossible, unless he should cease to live like a rehgious man. All his rehgious conduct would teach with command ing efficacy tfie very truths, which his voice denied. They would unceasingly behold Religion and all the duties of his life: they would hear it every morning and every evening in his family de votions. - '¦ ' ' REMARKS. From these observations it is evident, 1. Thnt the scheme of education, against which I have contended, is false, vain, and mischievous. ' - ¦ _ -" It is _/a/se, because the argument, by which it is supported, is false; because the opinions, which accompany it, are erroneous.; and because the views, with which it is professedly supported, are hypocriticak This is clear from the conduct of those, who de fend it : since that is directly contradictory to the scheme, itself, and to the reasons, alleged in its.defence. It is vain, because, in stead of accomphshing the purpose' intended, it would effectuate the contrary pui'pose. Instead of increasing candour,:and pro ducing investigation, it would only prevent investigation, and ad vance prejudice. It is mischievous, because it would prevent chil dren from knowing and enibracirig truth in the highest of all con cerns ; their duty and salvation ; and would lead them only to ig norance, eri-or; and iniquity^ Indeed .all this is so obvious, and so certain, that I hesitate not to pronounce those, who propose it, whenever they are men of un derstanding, wholly insincere in the proposal. It is, I think, impos sible, that tbey should be so bhnd to- such obvious truth, as for a a moment to imagine th^ education, which they urge; to be con sistent with reason and common sense. On the confrary, it^may, without any want of candour, be asserted, that their design is of a very different nature. Instead of aiming at the promotion of can dour in children, they unquestionably intend to persuade men to educate their children in ignorance of the Scriptures, in an habitu al disregard to them, and^ltimately in a con&med hatred of their jirecepts. They are sagacious enough to discernj that all persons are best fitted to i-eCeive religious impressions in childhobd ; and that, if they are suffered to grow up without them, they will either never receive them, or receive them with excessive difficulty. By pre- SEB. CXLVIL] OBJECTIONS. 191 scribing, and urging, this mode of education, they expect to see children habituated to Irreligion, and confirmed, without arguraent or conviction, in infidelity. In this manner, far more easily and surely than in all others, they hope to exterminate Religion from the world. . Of all these observations, complete proof is furnished by the conduct bf modern Infidels. In defiance of this very scheme, they have laboured with immense industry and-aft, to possess thera selves of the education of children, throughout France, Germany, and other countries of Europe. Nor have they laboured withput success. Distinguished Infidels have extensively become instruct ers of those, who were bOrn to wealth and greatness ; and men, corrupted by themselves, have still raore ebttensiyely taught Ae mass of mankind. All these they have trained up to the prin ciples of Infidelity, and to the unlimited practice of vice. ,The mind, almost from its infancy, they have debauched by sentiments and images of pollution ; withdrawn it from duty, from God, and, from Heaven, by fraud and falsehood ; aiid- allured to sin, and to hell, by art and ingenuity, by sophistry and entanglement, by insidious temptation and impudent example. With a smooth, soft, and lubricous progress, they have crept into the bosoms of the rising, generation ; and pierced them to the soul with fangs of poison. A general dis solution bf health, a hopeless decay of the vital energy, has fol lowed the incision. The bloom of life has vanished ; a livid hue overspread the frame, and every harbinger of death hastened to announce the speedy dissolution. , Here, no anxiety has been even pretended concernirig the pre- occupancy of the early mind,pr the prevention of future candour. No succeeding investigatipn has been even hinted ; and no inten tional discussion of the great question proposed. ^ Such fairness, indeed, was not to be expected from such men. Their only object has ever been to destroy the Bible, truth, and virtue ;and to the nature of all raeans, provided they will accoraphsh the end, they are perfectly indifferent., The man, who is deceiyed by such a scheme, supported by such arguments, and recommended by such men, must be a dupe of choice ; a gudgeon- caugbt -even without a hook. -2. From these observations it is also evident, that the~.Religious Education of cMldren is a high and indispensable duty. In the text, and in many other passages of Scripture, it is so- leninly coramanded by God. If the considerations, suggested throughout this discourse, are just ; it is powerfully enforced by Reason. Our children are bone ofour bone, and flesh of our flesh ; endeared to us by a thousand ties, and a thousand delightful offi ces. All their interests are ours ; and. often nearer to our hearts, than our own. They are committed to us, in solemn charge, by our Makef; . to be educated by Us for his service and kingdom. He has made all things, in iheir situation and ours, conspire to this 192 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION. [SER. CXLVtt great end. Their helpless state calls for the habitual care and watchfulness, the uniform kindness and confrol, of their parents. Their minds, unoccupied by falsehood, are easily susceptible ot truth, and fitted to receive and retain every useful impression. It the best impressions are not made, the worst will be ; and parents are the only friends, from whom may rationally be expected the comraunication of good, or the prevention of evil. If this duty be not early done; they may die before it is done, and their souls be lost. If they live ; we waste the golden season of doing them eternal good. Who, that is not dead to conscience, to humanity, and even to instinct, can thus act the ostrich ; and leave his little ones to be crushed by every foot ? Think of the awful account, to be given, of wrapping this talent in a napkin, and burying it in the earth. Think of the infinite difference between ascending with them to Heaven, and accompanying them down to the regions bf perdition. Think ofthe reflections, which must arise in thefr minds, and ours, throughout eternity, when their ruin shall be seen to have sprung from our neglect. Nor is this duty incumbent on parents only. Every Instructer is bound indispensably to second their endeavours, where they are faithful, and to supply, as far as may be, the defect, where they are not. Education ought every where to be Religious Education. The master is as truly bound to educate his apprentice, or his ser vant, in religion, arid the schoolmaster his pupil, as the parent his child. In the degree of obhgation, and of sin in violating it, there may perhaps be a difference. In the nature of it, there is none. The comraand is. Train Up a child in the way he should go ; direct ing all, who are entrusted with the care of children, to educate them in this manner. At the same time, parents are further bound to employ no In structers, who will not educate their children religiously. To com mit our children to the care of irrehgious persons, is to- commit lambs to the superintendency of wolves. No sober man can lay his hand on his breast, when he has placpd his child under the guidance of an irreligious teacher, and say, that be has done bis duty ; or feel himself innocent of the blood pf his child. No man will be able, without confusion of face, to recdtmt this part of his conduct before the bar of the final Judge. SERMON CXLVIII. THE ORDINARY MEANS OF GRACE. THE MANNER IN WHICH RE LIGIOUS EDUCATION IS TO BE CONDUCTED. MOTIVES TO THIS DUTY. Proverbs xxii 6. — Train up a chUd in the way he phould ga ; and when he it old, he will not depart from it. , In the last discourse, I considered the Duty of educating chil dren religiously. , In this, I propose, II. To point Old the manner, in which Religious Education should be conducted; and, III. To exhibit some ofthe Motives to the performance of this duty, suggested by the promise in the text. The terms. In which the command in the text is communicated, teach us, as I have heretofore observed, that Children, in their Edu cation, are to be drawn from one action, and attainment, to another, by . persuasion, promises, and other efforts, continually repeated. Under the general meaning of tliis phiiaseology, may be easilyjn- cluded, whatever I shall think it necessary to observe concerning this subject at the present time, v Some of the observations, formerly made concerning the general education of children, will be applied, here, to thefr Religious Education. So important a subject deserves to be presented in a full hght. No interesting, useful adjunct, ought to be forgotten by the mind, while employed in the consideration of a duty, which holds sp high a rank. So far as the narrow hmits, necessarily as signed to it in such a system of discourses, will allow, I shall en deavour to omit nothing, which is of peculiar weights 1 . Religious Education should he Beginn in the dawn of Child hood. J The earhest days, after intelhgence is fairly formed in the mind, are incomparably the best for this purpose. The child should be taught, as soon as he is capable of understanding the Instructions, vvhich are to be communicated. Nothing should be suffered to pre-occupy the place, which is destined to truth. If the intellect is not filled with sound instruction, as fast as it is ca pable of receiving it, the enemy, who never neglects to sow tares When parents are asleep, will imperceptibly fill it with a dangerous and noxious growth. The great and plain doctrines of religion should be taught so early, that the mind should never remember when it ^began to ,learn, or when it was without this knowledge. iWhenev«r it turns a r-efrospective view upon the preceding periods of its existence, these fruths should seem always to have been in Vol. IV. 25 194 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION. [SER. CSLVIII. its possession ; to have the character of innate principles ; to have been inwoven in its nature ; and to constitute a part of all its cur rent of thinking. ' In this manner, the best security, which is in tbe power of man, will be furnished against the introduction, and admission, of dan gerous errors. Tbe principles of Infidelity have little support in argument or evidence ; but they easily take deep root in the in clinations of the' mirid ; and hold, but too frequently, a secure pos session of its faith by the aid of passion and prejudice. No hu man method of preventing this evil is so effectual, as engrossing the assent to evangelical truth, when the mind is absolutely clear from every prepossession. A faith, thus established, all the pow er of sophistry will be unable to shake, in the same manner ought its religious Impressions to be begun. No period should be within the future reach of the memory, when they had not begun. Every child easily imbibes, at this period, a strong and solemn re verence for bis Creator ; easily realizes his universal presence, and the inspection of his all-seeing eye ; admits without difficulty, and without reluctance, that he is an awful and unchai^eable ene my of sin ; and feels, that he himself is accountable to this great Being for all his conducts The. conscience, also, is at this period exceedingly tender and susceptible ; readily alarmed by the ap prehension of guilt; and- prepared to contend, or to fly, at the ap proach of a known femplation. All the affections, also, are easily moved; and fitted to retain permanently, and often indelibly, whatever impressions are made. The heart is soft, gentle, and easily won ; strongly attached by kindness, pecuharly to the pa rents themselves, and generally to all others, with whom it is con nected. To every amiable; every good, thing, it is drawn compar atively Without trouble or resistance ; and united by bands, which no future art, nor force, can dissolve.^ Against every odious and bad thing its opposition is with equal ease excited, and rendered per manent. Its sensiMity to praise, for laudable actions, is exquisite ; and no less exquisite its dread of blame, for conduct which is unwor thy. Its hope also of future enjoyment, audits fear of future suffer ing, are awakeried in a moment, without labour, by obvious consider ations, and with a sfrength, which renders them powerful springs of action. This susceptibility, this tenderness of heart, -and of conscience, constitute a most interesting,; desirable, and useful preparation of the mirid to receive evangelical truths, and religious impressions ; and invest it with all the beauty and fertiUty of spring. Almost every thing which the eye discerns, is then fair, dehghtful, and promising. Let no person, to whom God has committed the use ful, honourable, and happy employment of cultivating minds, be idle at this auspicious season. On faithful, wise, and well-directed labours, busily employed at this period of the human year, the mildest winds of Heaven breathe ; its'most fertilizing showers de- SER,CXLVin.] - RELIGIOUS EDUCATION. 195 scend ; and its softest and most propitious sunshine sheds its hap py influence. He, who loses this golden season, will, vvhen the autumn arrives, find nothing in his fields, but barrenness and death.' Nor is this period less happily fitted for the establishment of use ful moral habits. Habits, as has been heretofore observed, are the result of custom, or repetition-; and may in this manner be formed at any age. But hi early ' childhood the susceptibihty is so great, and the feehngs so tender, that a few repetitions will gen erate habitual feeling. " Every impression at this period is deep. When these, dierefore, are made through a moderate succession, the combined effect cari rarely be efiaced. Thus good habits are soon, and durably, estabhshed ; and all that course of ti-ouble pre vented, of which parents so jusdy and bitterly complain, when this work is to be done at future seasons of life. But habits constitute tbe man. Good habits form a good man, and evil habits an evil man. Subtract these from the charac ter ; and it will be difficult to conceive what will be left. It is plain, therefore, that habits are of supreme importance to the well- being of the child, his character, his all. Of course, the estab lishment of those, which are good, is the first object of parental duty. 2. Religious Education should he continued with Steadiness, and Unifomuty. In the whole employment of educating a child. Steadiness of character in the parent is indispensable to success. The parent, as was formerly observed, should be decisively seen always to approve, and lave, the same things ; and always to disapprove, and hate such as are opposed to them. A settled purpose should be continually discovered in the conduct of the parent, with regard to this great concern : a purpose to fix in the mind of the child just views, and principles, of religion, and dispositions really and evangehcally virtuous. From tms purpose, nothing should ap pear to divert his attention, or withdraw his efforts. The rehgious education of his child should evidently appear to be a command ing business of his hfe ; not a casual, or occasional, employment. A changing, vibratory character in the parent will prove him to be either unstable, or not in earnest. No atfribute, which is not obvi ously vicious, is, perhaps, more unhappily found in the parental character. The parent, who exhibits a steady, firm, unalterable disposition, will naturally be believed by his children tp Ipve religion as he ought ; to make it the chief business of his life ; to be deeply en gaged in rendering fAem religious; and in all his insfructions to mean whatever he says. The whole weight of his character will, therefore, accompany his precepts ; and enforce them in the most efficacious, manner upon the minds of his children. 196 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION. [SER. CXLVIII. To convince the child of this character in the parent. Uniformi ty is of the last moraent. Whatever is pursued at times only, and in a desultory manner, children will never believe to be a serious object in the view of the parent. Whatever is sometimes exhibit ed, in the light of importance, and at others in that of unconcern, will only awaken doubt, and ultimately produce indifference. Im- pprtant objects, it is Well known, .always wear this' character in the vieW of him, who regards them as impdrtant ; and are therefore felt; and exhibited, in one, and that a serious, manner. So plainly, and so entirely, is this the fact, that children as easily as men, dis cover at once the true- place, which any thing holds in the estima tion of those arourid tbera, by the uniformity, or the inconstancy, wilh which they attend to it ; and by, the seriousness, or levity, with which it is .accompanied in their coriimunications. That, and that only, which is' taught every day, or on every proper occasion, and which is always taught seriously and earnestly, ia ever behev ed by the pupil fo hold a place of high importance in the mind of the insfructer. Orithe contrary, whatever is taught occasionally only, with levity, or with indifference ; or taught in a manner, now grave, now ligbt, sometimes earnestly, and sometimes with negligence, re gulariy at one period, and with long intermissions at another; Can scarcely be supposed to be of any great significance in the view of the teacher. This language of nature can be misunderstood by none. The earliest, and the weakest, mind perceives it in a moment, as well as the oldest, and the wisest. If, then; parents wish to make deep and solemn, impressions on their children; let them rememjjer, that Uniformity in their instructions is indispensable to this end. Besides, Uniforraity in teaching is absolutely necessary to the ' establishment of habit, both in thinking and feeling. If Instruc tions succeed each other after considerable intervals, or are given with a diversity of feelings on the part of the instructer, one truth, and one impression Will, in a degree, be worn out, before another is introduced. In the mean time, others of a different, and often of a Contrary, nature will be imbibed. Thus tJie Work, Kke; the web bf Penelope, Will be woven at one period, only to be destroyed at another. In this way the parent w'U find his task always dis couraging, and often fruitless, it ought to be reinembered, that Uniformity shouhi extend to every thing, which concerns ' this subject.: The instructions, the spirit with which they are enforced, nay, the very deportment of the instructer, aswell as the control, example, and life, should always wear one consistent appearance of soleriinity, earnestness, and en tire conviction. . ' ' ' , . - ; 3. In a Religious Education the Scriptures, only, should he taught. The youngest mind, which cah perceivp moral truth at all, clear ly discerns, that no doctrines can be invested with an. importance, comparable to that of the doctrines taught by God. The character of this great and awful Being is seen by the humblest intelligent SER. CXLVIII.] RELIGIOUS EDUCATION. 197 creature to be immeasurably distant from every other. This dis tinction, of supreme consequence in itself, should be preserved in its full force by the parent, thi-oughout all his instructions. Reli gious truth, that is, whatever is an obligatqry object of faith, or rule of duty; whatever pertains to.life and to godliness; is wholly, and only, taught by God. This great doctrine should be original ly impressed on the early mind; and should, afterwards, be never suffered to esca'pe from its attention. Scriptural truths should, for this reason, be clearly distinguished at every period, as the un questioned Word of God ; and come to the child with the sanction of divine authority. In this method the child will irabibe a rever ence for these fruths, entirely peculiar ; and, if no human opinions should be mingled with them in the instruction, will carry it through life. A litde mixture of philosophy, however, will in a great measure prevent this desirable gffect ; and imperceptibly lower the Scriptures from their supreme dignity, and inestimable importance, down to the humble level of mere human opinion. 4. Such parts of the Scriptures.^ only, should be taught, at any time, as may be made distinctly intelligible .io the mind of the pupil. The plainest things are universally the most important. God, in his infinite wisdom, has in this respect mercifully brought the means of rehgious knpwledge, our duty, and our salvation, within the reach of the young, and the ignorant ; who always constitute the great body of mankind, and, are equally interested in tliem with the experienced, and the knowing. The -most important things are thus placed in the power of Children. -At the same time it is evident, tfiat these are the only things, which are within their power. The instructer, who attempts. to teach them either docfrines, or precepts, more obscure, or more complicated ; or who mixes any extraneous instruction with that, which is obvious ; will only perplex, and ultimately confound the understanding of his pupil ; will cloud all his views ; and destroy his relish for learning. Nor should the Manner of teacMng be less plain and intelhgi ble, than the doctrines which are taught. In teaching children, there should be no display of learnmg ; no extensive or profound investigations; no introduction of tilings which are foreign to the subject in hand. The simplest language, the fewest and plainest words, and the most familiar illusfrations, only, should be adopted; and the whole force ofthe instructions, and the whole attention of the child, should as much as possible be confined to the doctrines themselves. For all superior discoveries, for objections and their answers, for the connexion and dependence of the truths which are taught, and for the proofs of their reasonableness and utility, the child should be referred to future opportunities, and the vigour of riper years. ; ^ , , 5. r^e Disposition, discovered, and felt, hy the Instructer, should always he thai of tender affection. 198 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION. [SEB. CXLVIIL No instructions are ever advantageously imbibed by children, except from those, whom they love : and they love none, except those, by whom they think themselves beloved. The real air, as pect, and proo^ of affection are as jdiscernibleby a child, as by a man; and his real friends as easily known. No persons feel af fection more tenderiy, or more carefully watch the conduct, in which it is discovered. But the only way to appeal* kind is to feel kindly^ and the only Way to be believed to have this charac ter is to possess it. • - It is not easy to. estimate the importaj^ce of the Manner, in this employment.^ The instructions of an unkind teacher are hated of course; pf a cunning one suspected ; of an uninterested one received with listless indifference. On the contrary, the affe.9tion- ate instructer is viewed by his pupil as a beloved friend- No employment invests man with more. amiableness, than well-directed instruction ; especially when the pupil is a httle cliild. From such a friend every thing is received, retained, and obeyed, with rever ence and .delight. By a teacher of this character more good can often.be done in a day, than by a disgusting one in a life. 6. Religion should always be exMbited in a solemn, and ^pleasing, and never in a gloomy; and discouraging Ught, There are persons, usually very ignorant, and frequently of a melancholy cast, who seem to suppose themselves, and otfeers,. re quired to be always pf a sorrowful and downcast deraeanour. The only religious duties, which appear to arrest their attention, are those, which belong to self-raortification. Between the. licentious gayety of loose men, and the serene cheerfulness of religion, they make, and are . apparently willing to make, no distinction. A smile, they mistake for an expression pf unwarrantable levity ; and the grateful, cheerful lives of their fellow-christians, they construe into mere courses of ^prldly ease, and sinful security. Of these persons, some are undoubtedly self-deceivers ; some are gross hypocrites ; especially those, who make great pretensions to sanc- iiiy, and rauch bustle, about their rehgious atlaiiiments. Others of thera, also, are unquestipnably Christians; Those of this class are all persuaded, that their views of rehgion are just ; arid, both frora a sense of duty, and the exercise of affection, feel themselves obhged tp communicate them to their children. What they teach, they exemphfy. Accordingly, both the instructions, and the ex amples, are only gloomy and awfuF-; and are regarded by their children only with dislike and dread. From the mere force of na ture the teacher may be loved, and his insfructions re verenped ; but both vyill'still be. met, and listened to', pnly with pain and' dis gust. Both the precepts, and the religion, which .they incukate, will be dreaded beforehand, and disrehshed afterv opinion; but it cannot, in any degree, have the nature of law ; nor be at all obligatory on their fellow-men. The Faikers of tke Church, for example, were in many instances good, and in some, wise, men. They are often valuable witnesses to facts. On a variety of occasions they help us to the true mean ing of words, phrases, and passages, in the Scriptures. They of ten edify us also by their piety. But their opinion, or judgment, or injunctions, pre totally destitute of authority ; and stand upon exactly the same level with thoSe of men, who now sustain a simi lar character. If we could rely on the authenticity of the smaller Epistles «f St. Ignatius ; or had we the Autographs in our posses sion^ all the injunctions, and declarations, contained in them, ex clusively of those derived from the Scriptures, Would be mere advice or information. 3. Whatever Church Officers the Scriptures have established as standing Officers, are appointed by God himself. The Church, there fore, is bound to receive them as having been thus appointed ; and to take effectual care, that they always exist. This will not be denied by any man, vvho admits the Divirie rev elation of the Scriptures. 4. No other officers, beside those thus appointed, kave any authori ty to plead for their existence in office. All others areof mere human institution ; convenient and useful perhaps ; but never to be regarded as possessing any authority, except what arises from the personal consent, or engagerr^ent, of those who receive ihem : and this can nev er he obligatory on thi consciences of others. It is to no purpose, here, to allege, that they have been intro duced, and established, by the deliberate determination of wise and good men ; pr pf the whple Churchl It is to no purpose to allege, that they have existed for any 16ngth of time, however great; nor that they have existed in various churches, however distinguished for learning and piety. It is to no. purpose to allege, that these Churches have believed thCm to be divinely instituted. This be lief, respectable as those are who have entertained it, can claim no more authority, and involves no more obligation, than any other opinipn concerning any other subject. 5. ^ tke Scriptures have constituted Officers in tke Ckurck, and hctve partially, and imperfectly, designated tkeir classes, numbers, offices, and duties, tken this imperfect exhibition of ihe subject, and this alone, is of divine autkority and obligation. It has been often supposed, that God has, of design, left the subject of Ecclesiastical Government partially exhibited" in the Scriptures. Whatever else was necessary to complete the system, he is further supposed to have left to be suppUed by the prudence of Christians, as the various circumstances of the Church, in vari- ous,ages and countries, might require. If this supposition be ad mitted; then whatever is contained in this imperfect institution of SER. CL.] WHO ARE MINISTERS. 223 Ecclesiastical Government, in the Scriptures, is authoritative and obligatory ; and whatever is supplied by human wisdom to com plete the system, is merely advisory and prudential. The fuU admission of these principles would, as it seems to me, prepare the way for a final removal of most disputes concerning this subject. _ ¦ These things being premised as indispensable to a just decision concerning this subject; I observe, that tAe sy stern of "Ecclesias tical Government, mentioned in the Scriptures, is disclosed by them either completely, or partially. If they have completely disclosed this system, then we shall find il all in the sacred volume ; and cannot need to search for it elsewhere. If they have disclpsed it partially ; then a partial disclosure was sufficient ; and this part is all that possesses, or can possess, any authority to bind the consciences of men. Whatever additions are made to it, and however wisely or necessarily they are made, by men, they can not pretend to the least authority or obhgation. It is in vain to say, that in this case the Church would be left at loose ends, and unprotected against disorder and schism. The answer to this objection is obvious, and coraplete. The Chui'cb is left, as Infi nite Wisdom chose to leave it. Should we grant, contrary to truth and decency, that the situation, in which it is left, is not the best ; still the evil is without remedy : for we cannot add to the words of God. Let us now inquire what Ecclesiastical officers are mentioned in the Scriptures as instituted by God. The largest, and most particular, account, .given of this subject in the Scriptures, is in Eph. iv. 11. And he gave some Apostles, and sonte prophets, and some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers. Here we find at least four sorts of officers in the Church ; four classes of men, who are empowered, each, to do sorae things in the Church, which they, and they only, had a right to do. The office of Apostles is acknowledged, ori all hands, long since to- have terminated. Of Prophets, it is only necessary to observe, that their office must terminate, of course, when inspiration terminates. Evangelists, the third class here mentioned, are universally ac knowledged to have been extraordinary officers, and to have ceased in a very early period of the Church ; unless tiie word be supposed to denote merely a minister withput a cure. There reraain, then, only Pastors and Teachers. From the phraseology, here used, it appears to me evident, that they were not two distinct orders of men, but one, destined to feed and teach the Church. The language is not, as in the preceding clauses, some pastor's, and some teackers, but some pastors and teachers, that is, some, who were both pastors and teackers. To teack the Church is to feed it with the bread of life. 224 OFFICEBS OF THE CHUBCH. ^ [SER. CL, Some Christian churches have supppsed, that teachers were men, whp, holding the pastoral office, were particularly to be em ployed in teacMng Candidates for ihe ministry whatever was ne cessary to qualify them for this office. Others have believed, that they were destined to the employment of teaching, and defending, evangelical truth generally ; without taking upon themselves tke care of particular Churckes. As all these, so far as I know, consider both kinds of officers as of the same rank, and as invested with exactly the sarae powers ; it will be unnecessary, at the present time, to examine this opinion. We are corae, then, to one class of permanent Ecclesiastical offi cers, mentioned in this text ; viz. That, wkich is known hy the word, Pastors. The Apostie is here recounting those officers, which Christ gave to the Church, when he ascended to Heaven : and it raust, I think, be admitted, that he mentions all those, which Christ gave to the Church directly, or in his own person. All other ec clesiastical officers, constituted in the Scriptures, were therefore constituted, afterwards, by the Apostles. Of these I know of but one class, mentioned in the Scriptures ; viz. Deacons. In Acts vi. seven men are said to have been chosen to this office, and set apart by prayer and the laying on of kands. ..The^only debate concerning ikis subject respects tke class, or class es, of Officers, denoted by the word Pastors. In my own opinion, this word includes a single class only ; spoken of elsewhere in the Scriptures under the names Elders, Biskops, Ministers, Teackers, and some others. This opinion I shall endeavour to support by the following arguments, derived from the Word of God. Of these I allege, 1. Tke Text. The text is addressed directly to the pastors of the Christian Church, under the name Elders ; derived as is that of Pastor also from the Old Testament. In the customary language of the Jews, the word Elders denoted the Rulers and Counsellors of that nation ; as some corresponding word has often denoted, either generally or particularly, the Rulers and Counsellors of other nationsi Thus among the Romans Senator, and among ourselves Senator, denote an officer, sirailar to the Jewish Elder. Human wisdom is chiefly the result of experience ; and experience is the result of years. Nations therefore, pecuUarly when unenlightened by science, have committed the direction of pubUc affairs, and pubUc counsels, al most exclusively io the aged. The name, in this appropriate sense, was naturally transferred to those, whp were to counsel and direct the Church ; especially by the Apostles, as being Jews, and writing originally for their ovvn countrymen. These Elders are exhorted to feed, that is, to teach, edify, and rule, thefiock of God. That the Greek word woiftaivw,' a derivative of w-hich is here translated feed, signifies to rule, in the. most extensive manner, SEB. CL.] WHO ARE MINISTERS. 225 can be doubled by no man, at all conversant with the Greek lan guage, either in the Classics, or the New Testament. Tbey are also directed to take the oversigki ofit, or, in more exact language, to oversee it, (they had already taken the oversight of it) willingly ; not of constraint, nor for tke sake of gain. The Greek word, ren dered taking tke' oversigki, is stfirfxoifxvTEs, exactly rendered oversee ing, or exercising the office of an overseer, or bishop. Elders, therefore, were to exercise the office of a Bishop, or Overseer; and of course were invested with, that office. To this the only reply is, that Elder is a generic term, including both Biskops and ordinary Elders, or Ministers. TMs will be consider ed farther on. At present, I observe, that these directions are given to Elders absolutely, and as Elders, merely ; and to all El ders, therefore, without distinction. I know not by what warrant we can suppose, that St. Peter, writing with the Spirit of Inspiration, has written so loosely, as to express that in the most absolute man ner, which was intended in a very limited sense ; so limited, as to exclude nineteen-twentieths of all those, who are apparently included in his direction : while at the same time, he has given no notice, either before or after, of this design. What, in such a case, must be the construction of this passage by the Elders; to whom it was written ; and- what their consequent conduct, in obe dience to it ? If it be supposed, by us, who have the whole Bi ble before us, that this strange construction ought to be given to it; would it be possible for these Elders, who had no other writ ing of this Apostle, and few of them, probably, any other writings of the New Testament, to understand, that what is here obviously made the duty of every Elder, was really the duty of one only, out of many ? 2. I allege. Acts xx. 17, 28, And from Miletus ke sent to Epke- sus, and called the Elders of tke Ckurck, A part of the directions which he gave to these Elders is recited thus : Take keed, tliere fore, to yourselves, and to all the flock, over tke which tke Holy Ghost hath made you Overseers, to feed the Church of God, which he katk purchased with his own blood. ,-f, ,i On these two verses, thus connected, I remark, First. That in Ephesus there were several Elders of the Ckurck. Secondly. That all these Elders were Biskops. The word, rendered in the EngUsh Translation, Overseers, is in the original HituSxnitae, die only word, in the New Testament, which is rendered Biskop, The word Bishop, is synonymous with Over seer. Thirdly. Tkat tke Holy Ghost constituted,, or made, tkese seve ral Elders, Bishops. The original word is eim, constituted. Fourthly. That in Ephesus all the Elders of the Church were Bishops. These were plainly all the Elders of that Church : as is evident from the phraseology. The words are, And from Mi letus he sent io Ephesus, and called the Elders of the Church. Vol. IV. 29 226 OFFICERS OF, THE CHURCH. [SEB. CL. Fifthly. Tkat, ikerefore, there was no one Bishop, of superior authority ; or holding an office, or character, which distinguished him from other Bishops in ihat City, Sixthly. That Timothy could not be, alikougk ke is extensively supposed tp kave heen, the sole Bishop, or Diocesan, of the Ckurck in- tkat City ; because other men were Bishops in tkat Ckurck, The Elders, to whora St, Peter wrote in the text, were all who dwelt in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia Proper, and Bitkynia ; provinces, constituting more than two-thirds of that great country, called the Lesser Asia ; at that time full of Churches and Chris tians. All ike Elders of all tkese Churckes ke exhorts io exercise the office of a Bishop in tke Ckurck- All the Elders in Ephesus, the chief city in the same country, St. Paul declares fo have been constituted Biskops by tke Holy Gkost. Botk Aposdes speak the same language to the same persons : lan guage, which has obviously but one meaning. '^. These passages in the most exphcit manner teach us, that El ders, universally, and Bishops, are the same persons ; destined to exactly the same purposes, and invested with exactly the same powers. 3. I allege PMl, i. Paul and Timotheus, servants of Jesus Ckrist, to all tke saints in Christ Jesus, wko are in Pkilippi, witk tke Bish ops and Deacons, Concerning this passage, I observe. First. That tkere is no mention made of Elders in ikis Ckurck by name, Tke saints, witk tke Bishops and Deacons, are expressly men tioned. If there were Elders in this Church, who were distinct from the Bishops, the omission of them is inexplicable. If Elders be allowed to have been officers, inferior to Bishops ; they were unquestionably superior to Deacons ; and it is incredible, that this letter should not have been addressed to them also, wheh it was addressed to the Deacons, The important interest,,^nd office, which they held in this Church, rendered it highly proper, that the contents of the letter should be addressed personally to them : more so, certainly, than that it should be addressed to the Dea cons. Had it been addressed to Biskops, Elders and Deacons, it would have been ikougkt, by an advocate for prelatical Episco pacy, absolutely decisizie in favour' of tkree orders of Ecclesiastical Officers. As it now stands, arid as it is uncontradicted by any other passage of Scripture, I think it is equally decisive, tkat tkere were hut two. Secondly, iif is certain, tkat in tke PMlippian Church there were several Bishops ; and, therefore, whatever was the case with other Churches in this ¦respect, tkere was not at PMlippi a single Biskop, presiding over a number of subordinate ministers. But there is no reason to' conclude, that the PMlippian Church was, in this re spect, differently constituted from other Churches. SEB. CL.] WHO ABE MINISTEBS. 227 4. I allege the ffact, that no mention is made of Bishops, by way of address, {except the text just quoted from Pkilippians i. 1) or di rection, or salutation. The word stfKfxo*!)?, {Biskop, or Overseer) occurs in the New Testament five times. Once it is applied to Christ ; viz. 1 Pet. ii. 25 ; and/our times denotes officers in the Church. The word Bitiifieiifri, is once used to denote tke Office of a Biskop ; viz. 1 Tim. iii. 1 ; in two instances, to denote visitation; Luke xix. 44. and 1 Pet. ii. 12 ; and once is quoted from Ps. cix, 8, to denote, by way of accommodation, tke employment of Judas as an Apostle. Eifirfxnirsw, to oversee, or exercise tke office of a Biskop, is used once witk tkat meaning; viz. in the text; and once, Heb. xn. 15; where it is translated, with exact propriety, looking diligently. In all the addresses of their several letters by the apostles to the several Churches,