"e i r h4- KEY POPERY OF OXFORD. PETER MAURICE, B.D, (late op JESUS COLr.EOE,) CHAPLAIN OF NEW AND ALL SOULS* COLLEGES, OFFFCIAlriNG MINISTER AT KENNING TON, BEHKS. : nn>3DV "|nn«-]D dh^jdo nnn-'jM *]15?m ^33« n^^N-^3 dn Drr'jM mmi nopi yir^^ ¦mt«tn nnwi * Thou therefore gird up thy loins, and arise, and speak unto them all that I command thee : be not dismayed at their faces, lest I confound thee before them.**— Jer. 1. 17. LONDON: FRANCIS BAISLER, 124, OXFORD STREET; SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, AND CO., STATIONERS' COUKT ; NISBET AND CO., BERNEKS STREET ; SEELEYS, FLEET STREET. 1838, i FJA0AN.;. T. C. Savill, Printer, 107, St. Martin's Lane, Charing Cross, ARMS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD. Azure, a book expanded Argent, with strings or labels Or, upon which are written these words in gold, " Sapientia et felicitate,'* between three ducal crowns of the third. — Wood's Annals Univ. Oxford, book ii., vol. iii., ed. Gutch, (1.) Dominus illuminatio mea — ** The Lordmy light.*^ (2.) Sapientia et felicitate — " In wisdom and happiness.^' (3.) Bonitas regnabit — " Goodness shaU reign." (4. ) Veritas liberabit — " Truth will set free.'" ANALYSIS. Intkoduction. — Allusion made to circumstances connected with the former pub lication of the Author.— Copies sent to the Sovereign, to the Rulers of the Church, and to the Heads of Universities. — No notice taken of the party by persons qua lified by station in the church, or ability, induces the Author to make an appeal to the public at large. — The party spirit (or popery) of the press and the re ligious public. — Objections to the Author's style met and answered. — Neces sity of probing deeply the moral wounds under which the visible church is suf fering. — Invocation of the Divine blessing upon the Author's labours. — The ob ject of the work, information on the subject of the party spirit manifesting itself in the church of England. — Armorial bearings of Oxford shew the inconsistency of their practice with their profession. — Symbolical language of Scripture de serving especial notice. — Constitution of the University of Oxford corresponding with that of the New-Testament church ; its forms and ceremonies based upon the word of God; its language scriptural. — Oxford and Cambridge contrasted; their inefficiency, owing to an exclusive system of education. — Metaphysics and Physics, not properly balanced, tend to infidelity or superstition. — The educa tion of the lower classes afl'ecting the higher ones, raises the standard of litera ture and theology. — Oriel the leading college in the University ; its members eminent among the factions of the day. — Tendency of extreme views when the intellect not properly balanced ; subject illustrated by reference to state of party feeling. — Oriel College a nursery of Anglican catholics ; their near resemblance to the Irvingite persuasion. — Commencement of the Association. — Dissension among the Tutors. — The effect of travelling in foreign parts upon the views of the first agitators of this system. — Tract manufacturing. — Writing in periodicals commences in 1833. — The Remains of the Rev. R. H. Froude elucidate their manoeuvres. — Extracts of letters, implicating many individuals. — Professor Keble and Mr. Newman, principal correspondents. — The predilection of the party to wards a system of Anglican popery. — Effect of a study of Aristotle's logic upon religion generally, upon Oxford theology particularly. — Oxford degrees; how far valuable. — No examination after the B.A. degree. — Incompetency of an Ox ford graduate to decide upon subjects of a scientific or theological nature. — Re gius Professor of Divinity deprived of his privileges. — Clergy of Oxford en- couraging or indifferent to the subject; attend the early service at St. Mary's church. Dr. Pusey's misstatements in regard to innovations in the dress and public ministrations of clergymen at Oxford.— Canons of Christ Church; their practice of bowing to the altar. — The University of Oxford sanctions and upholds the party.— Dr. Pusey appointed by the Vice-Chanoellor to preach the Fifth of November Sermon ; makes it a vehicle for stirring up old political grievances. — Allusion to the Pusey Horn.— Ravages of the Danes at Oxford. — The views of the party countenanced by the Heads of Houses. — A deliberative body liable to party bias. — Nomination of select preachers and Bampton lecturer favourable to the views of the party. — The Professor of Moral Philosophy and other Fellows of Exeter College countenance their leading dogmas. — The doctrines of the gospel in danger from the sophistry of infidelity. — Combe's Constitution of Man ; circu lated without any adequate antidote. — Ignorance of the natural laws productive of false principles of morality. — Dedications of their works to one another. — Inves tigation of the names and armorial bearings of the party a key to their influence. — Dr. Pusey's and Dr. Hampden's crests symbols of their treatment in the University. — Spiritual and heart religion despised. — The evangelical party afraid of the new sect. — The leaders of the Pusey school incompetent to the office they aspire to; one prop already given way. — Self-denial of literary men misunder stood ; ought to consist of intellectual rather than physical abstinence. — Oxford boat-races. — Self-esteem and ignorance of the spirit of the gospel influence their public conduct towards those that differ from them. — Worldly character of the opposition made by the evangelicals. — Cambridge school of theology. — Signs of the times.— Closing the temple door.? against the gentiles the cause of the destruc tion of Jerusalem. — Exclusive setting up of an apostolical succession church symp tomatic of the cutting off of the Gentile church. — The Rev. W. Palmer's efforts to cut off from the visible body of Christ the church of Scotland. — The negligence of the University authorities in checking the spreading of the heresy. — Mr. New man's early Sacrament. — Injurious effect of these dogmas upon the morality and literature of the University. — Introduction of works of an anti-protestant tendency into public and private libraries. — Public attention called to the subject with a. view to the furnishing of an adequate antidote to the poison disseminated. INTRODUCTION, In drawing attention to the subject-matter of the present publi cation, the Author feels himself called upon to add a few lines by way of Introduction, not as requiring any apology for the step he now takes, but as an explanation due to those who may not have seen his former pamphlet, to which this is intended as another Appendix. Circumstances connected with the former, being rather peculiar in their nature, may better serve the end the Author has in view by being related than suppressed, as they will prove, when examined into, that the object aimed at was, an honest and simple desire to have the subject under dis cussion taken up by such only as had the power, talents, piety, and experience, requisite for such an enterprize. Ever since the year 1833, the state of things in respect to religious truth in Oxford, had been becoming gradually more decided in its cha racter, and no step was taken by any one to remedy the growing evil. In the spring of last year, the Author gave notice of an intention to bring the subject before the public, having adver tised nearly three months previous to its issuing from the press, without any one better qualified stepping forward to undertake it, or to proffer either assistance or advice. Hence it may rea sonably be inferred, that the only blame that could attach to bim would be, lack of experience, not of principle. The object in view was the same as that of the party confronted ; namely, " agitation ;" having as its definite aim a reformation of abuses which deform us as a protestant and moral estabUshment. But though the end was identical, the means resorted to were, both in themselves and in their application, very different. In the one, they were stealthy, by combination, drawing largely upon the literary and pecuniary resources of a party, as well as by com mencing the attack at the extremities and weakest lines of the enemy ; in the other, they were straightforward — the effort of an humble individual, unassisted by party, either in literary or pecu niary contributions, with no prospect of success except from the balance of truth on his side ; the appeal made, not to the young and inexperienced, and the dregs of the population, but to the high and noble, and the educated portion of society, including the sovereign, the bishops, and the heads of our Universities. The volume was intended for the eye of that sovereign who is now removed from the evil to come, and went forth dedicated to him as supreme governor both in church and state. In consequence of circumstances over which the Author had no control, the work never reached him, and the royal copy was subsequently transmitted to her Majesty's librarian, who promptly acknowledged the receipt of the same ; at the same time, a memorial was forwarded to her Majesty's private secre tary, to be laid before her, praying her gracious acceptance of the same, and respectfully invitii.g attention to the subject as one intimately connected with the welfare of herself and the people entrusted to her by the appointment of Almighty God. Some extra copies were also printed, and orders given to an agent in town to forward them, with his private card, to the archbishops and bishops of the church of England; and copies were sent to the Chancellor and Vice-chancellor of his own University, and to the respective heads and governors of colleges and halls in all the English Universities. The Author, having waited patiently for twelve months to see if the subject would be taken up by any one else better qualified by his station in the church, or talents, natural or acquired, or if any one would step forward and offer assistance, or give en couragement or advice, is now taking up the gauntlet himself laid down, and in humble dependence upon the fostering care of an unseen but Almighty arm, he stands forth as the vindicator of the just rights of a discerning public, for whose eye these pages are now issuing forth from the press. The former work was necessarily unavailable to the general reader, being both voluminous and expensive, and intended specially for the eye of those who could weigh the subject carefully, and who might be expected to sympathize with, and make every due allow ance for, the inexperience and infirmities of the writer. But as they have not done their part, either in the way of faithful reproof, warning, encouragement, advice, or proffer of support, themselves must share in the responsibility of this second measure, and doubtless they will reap their reward, for according as a man sows so may he expect to reap. To the reviews, maga zines, newspapers, &c., the Author feels himself very, much indebted for their almost unanimous silence, as it has afforded him such a key to the state of the public press as will prove practically invaluable. How far the public, however, may feel indebted to them for a neglect of their professed duty is another question, particularly those among them that hang out a flag to deceive the unwary by a show of religion. Had there been many, nay, even any, besides, who had stood up in public and openly confronted these men, there might have been some excuse ; but no such work has appeared, and the only authentic document as yet in print is the statements made by the present writer. There are, it is true, many things written, but they are either anonymous (therefore no authority, either by the law of God or man,) or else to be gathered from incidental notices in sermons, charges,* speeches, &c,, for even dignitaries of the church do not * Archdeacon Spooner, in his Charge, warned the clergy against the crochetty knot of divines that had recently appeared at Oxford. Archdeacon Townsend, of Durham, in his Charge, was regarded by the party themselves as so explicit that it called forth a reply in a letter from Dr. Pusey. The Bishop of Chester's speech at Exeter Hall on the 2nd of May, at a meeting of the Great Bible Society, is also much to the point, wherein he contrasts the simplicity of the Bible with the sophistry of human productions, in which he makes especial allusion to a work on Justification by Faith (the last work of the Rev. J. H. Newman), which he had just been perusing. " There was a passage in the report which spoke of the sufficiency of the Scrip tures; that fact was acknowledged and felt all over the world, and it might appear strange that it should be necessary to advert to it or to dwell upon it. And yet it was not stated, perhaps, in vain, for he had found, in reading an eru dite volume which had recently been published, the question proposed. Whether tlie Scriptures were actually to be comprehended by a common understanding ? It was admitted that a person of shrewd understanding might comprehend them, but it doubted whether that could be the case with the mass of society. But only let the records of that society be examined, and abundant proof would be fur nished that the Scriptures were able to make wise unto salvation, through faith in Christ. (Hear.) Nor was it necessary to go back to distant centuries to see how men of old understood and explained the Scriptures, and whether they were really valuable — though he was not insensible to the value of ancient books ; that truth which was the basis of his hopes, and which supported him under all his trials and difficulties, was derived, not from the writings of antiquity, but from the precious volume itself. (Cheers.) He was not insensible to the fact that the same conclusions and inferences had been drawn from those truths by others, but still it was his privilege to come to the word itself. He knew not whether he would not willingly put away at least half the folios which he possessed rather than part with one volume which had recently been published by the missionary Williams (much cheering), in which it was stated that thousands had cast away their idols and received the truths of the gospel, and been made happy by them, without the use of any of those volumes upon which some persons laid so much stress. (Cheers.) He was reminded, by the obscurity which those said volumes cast upon the truth, of two lines of an old poet, on the course of the stream of time, ' Which, darker as it downward goes. Is marked by past and present errors.' Yes, past and present errors ; that was what they were likely to come to when they gave up the substance for the shadow, realities for forms, and ideas for words. (Hear.) A friend of his had recently read a volume on faith, and he remarked that he was very glad that faith was more clearly described in the word of God, for that if it were not so he much doubted whether he should understand it from reading that volume. He himself had been reading a book which treated on justification : he had read St. Paul on that subject, and thought he understood him, and that a man was justified by faith; but when he read that author he 10 scruple to give them a side-blow occasionally, as they are, to the eye of the Christian who can discern the state of the times, like the locust, the canker and palmer worm, consuming and be fouling all the verdure of our pastures. That the periodicals of the day have no plea of ignorance to allege, is very obvious, both from the advertisements that from time to time have ap peared in their columns, and the editors, in town and elsewhere, having had copies transmitted to them for their perusal. What kind of apology they may make to the public for not express ing SOME opinion of the work rests with the parties concerned ; the author of the " Popery of Oxford" has been too long en gaged in studying the principle of human nature to be ignorant that there is such a thing as the Popery of the Press ; that they do not, or will not, understand him, is the best and only true reason they can assign. As he has taken a stand different from what the fashion of a God-forsaking people would select, so he is resolved, in the strength of the Lord, to maintain his ground, and being first in the field, he trusts he may have what the British soldier never has lacked — courage to stand hy his colours, even though he should be the last. His motto has long been " that having done all, he may have grace to stand ;" difficult as it has been, in the midst of the many temptations, to abstain from rushing forth upon the surrounding enemy, he stands faithful to the crew of his leaky vessel, and will not desert his post till those colours are irretrievably dishonoured or destroyed. The Lord has not forsaken his people that prayeth, and when the time is fully come, he wHl send forth into the field his own faith ful ones; and though a few, if he leads them forth, they need not be afraid of the whole power of the enemy, for one should chase a thousand, and two put ten thousand to flight. The banner has been lifted up and the Lord's people are invited to flock to the gathering standard, and, as no better can be fur nished, let it be the armorial shield of Oxford, (even the Book of Levi — the lion of Judah — the crowns of Reuben, and the Lamb of God, with the cross of self-denial and the key of know ledge.) Let us down with our party colours, keep back our private or public bias, and look to the arm of our God only, for " sal vation belongeth unto the Lord, and his blessing is upon his people." Let us hasten to the only true fountain of light and life, lest we be carried away and beguiled, through phUosophy found it difficult to ascertain how he was to be justified, or even whether he could be justified at all. He valued the Bible, therefore, and felt grateful that it had not been taken from them, seeing they had been too unfaithful to it." The subject has also been handled in sermons, that have from time to time been published, but so mixed with inaccuracies in the statement of facts, as well as misconception of doctrines held by them, that their cause has rather been strengthened than weakened by such attacks. 11 and vain deceit, after the tradition of men and the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ, The Author feels that there is too much room for objection to his style, and cannot but deplore that it is not more accept able to the general reader ; but as it is his own — and moreover his aim to appear before the public in his natural character, and not in the artificial guise of another — he trusts that the evidence of the testimony will not be very materially affected by any peculiarity in the personal appearance or phraseology of the witness. What in a foreigner is received as not only natural but agreeable, is regarded as both bad in taste and truly offensive in manner, when the result of imitation ; besides, it is far from improbable that the honest Englishman will soon detect the artificial colourings of those who have words and not facts to back them ; and as soon as the eye of the mind has been opened, not all the words in the world can avail to close it again. It will appear, upon a due examination of the subject, that the literary character of the Oxford school of divinity is that of a body of men to whom a knowledge of words is a congenial study; now, itis sufficiently clear, that they who attend to words (or logic) seldom mind things, and they who mind things are too little attentive to words ; for a man may have a very enlarged conception of things, but a very moderate command of language, — hence it so often happens that persons who bestow much attention on anything not generally understood or in common use, give us the benefit of their researches and discoveries at first but confusedly. The writer would also make a few brief remarks on the spirit by which he has been actuated in the course of the work. He has his infirmities and peculiarities in common with every one de scended from the first Adam, and if, by reason of any prevail ing feature in his natural disposition, he may have written things which appear to others partaking of either bitterness or satire, he begs to premise that it is not intentional ; he has been careful and watchful in that respect, both for the sake of others, as for his own, and that upon the highest principle of Christian duty, having the blessed Saviour's own authority for the timely warning, that with whatever judgment we judge, we shall be judged ; and with what measure we mete, it shall be measured to us again. But that some wounds are to be cleansed only by the ap plication of caustic is a truth few need to be reminded of in the surgical dispensation. So, also, in respect to the wounds and putrifying sores in the spiritual dispensation, we have the authority of God's inspired physicians, who have used most caustic and biting reproofs when they have been probing the wounds that could not be lightly healed. And for any one to 12 imagine that a merry countenance* and a cheerful conversation is inconsistent with the character of a child of God, is a figment of Popery, and fit only for those who could deform, not reform, the fallen faculties of our nature, particularly when we recollect that the promised seed of Abraham had a name (Isaac) given him, which signified laughter, or joy ; and who so entitled to rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory as those whom the Lord has redeemed from the hand of the enemy, whose dis tinguishing feature is still the same as in the beginning; viz., a mockery of the children born after the Spirit. May the blessing of Jehovah, the Author, not of confusion, but, of peace, in all the churches of the saints, accompany this effort of his weak and erring ministering servant, and guide each soul that trembles at his word into all truth, and a patient waiting for the appearing of the great God and Saviour, so that it may be with joy, and not with grief, by the eftectual working of his Holy Spirit, St. Maiy's {vvlgo New) College, Oxford, June 20, 1838. [Accession of Queen Victoria kept.] * The effect of the passions as affecting the physiognomy is a subject concern ing which the scriptures are not silent; for instance, the falling of the counte nance of Cain when he was wroth because the Lord had no respect to his offer ing, &c. ; also, that an angry and irritable disposition is symbolized as a man with contracted nostrils, &c. an ivp, short of nostrils, Prov. xiv. 17— He that is soon angry [short of nostrils] dealeth foolishly ; he that is slow to wrath [long of nostrils] is of great understanding. n>BN tin, long of nostrils, Prov. xiv. 29 — He that is slow to wrath, is of great understanding ; but he that is hasty of [short of] spirit, exalteth folly : xv. 18, xvi. 32, slow to anger; xxv. 15, long for bearing. Applied also to God himself, Exod. xxxiv. 6 ; Numb. xiv. 18 ; Neh. ix. 17, &c. It is to be feared that the crisis is near at hand when the prophetic language of Jehovah is about to be accomplished, and he will shorten his nostrils, utterly to cut off all those that are disobedient and strive against his word, (see Isa. Ixv. ,5 ; Ezek. xxxviii. 18.) The wisdom of wise men is perished, and the understanding of the prudent men is hid,, and God is revealing himself to the babe. Neither is it possible that the high and holy One, who inhabits eternity, will endure to see his own wonderful name and glorious truths so shamefully dishonoured, with out sooner or later visiting for the offence. Truly applicable to the present state of religion among us is the language of Jehovah, by his servant Ezekiel, saying — " Son of man, prophesy against the shepherds of Israel, prophesy, and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord God unto the shepherds, Woe be to the shepherds of Israel that do feed themselves! should not the shepherds feed the flocks?" Therefore, O ye shepherds, hear the word of the Lord ; Thus saith the Lord God, behold, I am against the shepherds; and I will require my flock at their hand, and cause them to cease from feeding the flock; neither shall the shepherds feed themselves any more; for 1 will deliver ray flock from their mouth, that they may not be meat for them. For thus saith the Lord God, behold, I, even I, will both search my sheep, and seek them out. As a shepherd seeketh out his flock in the day that he is among his sheep that are scattered ; so will I seek ou t my sheep, and will deliver them out of all places where they have been scat tered in the cloudy and dark day." KEY THE POPERY OF OXFORD, Oxford, May 17, 1838.* Since the publication of that work to which this forms another Appendix, much has been written, and many facts have transpired, which serve to confirm and substantiate the views advanced therein, and satisfy every unsophisticated mind with respect to this newly- revived heresy and sectarian faction now almost dominant in the Church of England. To touch upon these particulars, as briefly as may be consistent with the size of a pamphlet intended for a class of readers less able to furnish themselves with a more expensive one, shall be the object of the present undertaking. Much misapprehension, as well as misrepresentation, has arisen from the apparent extraordinary title of the work — " The Popery of Oxford," But the expression was not employed hastily, or without well weighing it in the balances of truth and of sound experimental philosophy. Neither has the writer of the said work introduced a subject, which to many, perhaps most, of his readers, may seem trifling and visionary, without being at the same time prepared to support it — namely, an allusion to the armorial insignia of our autient University. When, indeed, we bring the mind to meditate calmly on what Oxford is, by its carefully preserved body of statutes, and its outward symbols, both in the general and the detail, and what it is in its spirit and its present degenerated condition, then truly the wonder ceases. For if signs and symbols have any meaning, they are not attended to among ourselves. To say that they who were permitted to found our University, when they made choice of such appropriate symbols, did not know what they were about, much less to infer that God himself had no hand in the establishment of an academy that has stood the test of so many ages and generations, is a conclusion anything but philosophical. What symbols could be more adapted to a place set apart for the honour of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the advancement of true reli gion, than those which have been selected from the book of his own revelation ? We have as a supporter on the one side a Lion, a type well known to Israel, even the Lion of Judah ; on the other a Lamb, known to literal Israel as a type of their Messiah, recognised by the * Birthday of Queen Victoria kept. C 14 spiritual Israel as the Lamb of God that taketh away the sin of the w'orld ; on his right Shoulder He bears that in which it is permitted each believer to glory, even the cross stained with blood upon a pure white banner of righteousness and truth. Attached to the other is the Key, by which alone there is an entrance into that hidden wisdom, without which all the learning of ages is as an idle tale. Humility is the only key to that wisdom which is from above, and we must become as little children before we can expect to learn the deep things of God. On a shield of azure blue, is painted the Book of books, open, with its seven seals unloosed — upon it is written " Wisdom and Happiness," (sapientia et felicitas,) around it three crowns of gold. Above there is suspended a cloud-encircled diadem, with the heavenly scroll, " the Lord is my light," (Dominus illuminatio mea.) Beneath the shield another scroll, forming a support to the Lion and the Lamb, and upon it, "Goodness shall reign," (Bonitas regnabit;) "Truth shall set at liberty," (Veritas liberabit.) And when any of the learned Doctors of (")xfbrd can shew that these emblems are lifted up for a different purpose, it will be time enough for them then to hold up to the scorn of the public the interpretation put upon them by the repu- diator of the Oxford Popery. In the fifth chapter of the Revelation, we have the subject referred to in this manner : — " And I saw in the right hand of him that sat on the throne a book, written within and on the backside, sealed with seven seals. And I saw a strong angel proclaiming with a loud voice. Who is worthy to open the book, and to loose the seals thereof? And no man in heaven, nor in earth, neither under the earth, was able to open the book, neither to look thereon. And I wept much, because no man was found worthy to open and to read the book, neither to look thereon. And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not : behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof". And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the throne, and of the four beasts, and in the midst of the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God sent forth into all the earth. And he came and took the book out of the right hand of him that sat upon the throne. And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints."* * No person can doubt that a large portion of the Apocalypse is delivered in symbols, or in the language of symbols. Indeed, in the very first verse of the book we are informed that the things communicated were symbolised (tarjiiaviv) to John ; that is, made known by symbols or significant signs, for this is the proper sense of the verb er]f/.aivii>, m contradistinction to what is declared in common speech. All primitive languages are highly figurative, and they are so from necessity ; men must possess ideas, before they seek words to express them, and when new ones are produced, making use of the language they possess, they have recourse 15 And is it not by the same road that we are alone enabled to arrive at true learning ? Is not the Lamb an emblem of Humility and the Affections, and the Lion of Courage to overcome difficulties, and of the Passions; and must not the passions be overcome by the affec tions, before we shall be able to use the key of true knowledge? — and in Oxford at least, where the seven liberal arts and sciences, and the three philosophical ones, are professedly studied ; it is very much out of character to say that they, who framed the statutes, and devised the shield, knew not what they were about when they placed the book of the seven seals, and the three bright crowns upon the standard ; or, that they, who have been so exact in having ten at least to form a house in which the public business should be trans acted, and that the head governor should have the seven rods,* &c., carried before him, when he appears in the full symbolic dignity of Official State, should assert that their Fathers knew nothing of the mean ing of all these things, whatever their Sons may do, is a position that, under existing circumstances, is pecuharly difficult to maintain. But if we substitute the compUcated key of heathen philosophy — or the still more rusty picklock of the early fathers, instead of the Key held forth by the Lamb, we shall, as we well deserve, be dislodged from our trust, and our inheritance shall another take. Though the ground thus occupiedis, apparently, so extraordinary, he who now stands thereupon is not to be dislodged, unless better weapons are resorted to than the learning gathered together from the sages of heathen antiquity. If the men of Oxford prefer to dabble in the mysticism of Plato, or Aristotle, and the still less inteUigible theories of to such natural objects around them as are known to possess qualities in some way resembling the idea they wish to communicate. Hence the language of metaphor, which uses such expressions as these: — "God is my rock, my fortress, my high tower, my shield, and the horn of my salvation." Among the Egyptians tliis kind of writing was carried to the highest degree of perfection; those traditions and mysteries, which were thought of sufficient impor tance to be handed down to their successors, were engraven on the pyramids, the walls of their temples, and other works of art, and hence the name hieroglyphic, from two Greek words, Upog, holy, and yXv^eiv, to engrave. The oldest writings which the corroding tooth of time has suffered to reach us, and particularly the prophetic books of the Scriptures, abound in hieroglyphical language ; nor can particular parts of them be understood correctly, without a knowledge of this species of writing. Indeed, those whose peculiar duty it is to devote their labours to the elucidation of such writings, ought to make the sym bolic language an object of particular study, that they may not only be able to ascertain the general signification of symbols, as such, but those legitimate shades and modifications of meaning which result from their varied associations. In such an investigation, it should not for a moment be forgotten, that each symbol has a precise and determinate meaning ; and that, until this be ascer tained with respect to any one specified, it will be absolutely impossible to settle its peculiar signification in combinations which necessarily affect the features, though not the radical sense of the symbol. — Tilloch on the Apocalypse, pp. 160, 194, 165. * The silver one is only used upon special occasions, six being the, ordinary complement. 16 the early fathers, while they neglect the book of the Revelation of the Lord Jesus Christ, they need not be surprised that the Lord God should raise up in the midst of them, one, who though a very child in the learning of the schoolmen, hesitates not to rebuke them sharply, and warn them of the danger they are exposed to. If the dark and earthy Church of Rome has lost a knowledge of her symbols, and placed the " three crowns" upon the brow of her idol Pope, and has her six lights burning on her altars (the seventh being put out, and represented by the elevated host), without knowing why and wherefore they are there ; let us at least not imitate her in the use of them, and if we know not the proper meaning of our own hieroglyphics, let us rather lay them altogether aside. When the constitution of the University of Oxford is carefully scrutinized, it will be clear to all unprejudiced minds that it has been framed with such wisdom, that we can assign it no other origin than a deep insight into the blessed records of God's own people Israel, both under the Law as well as the Gospel. It embraces within itself an union of the old and new dispensation, pointing to the one, as passed away, and to the other, as being yet present. Oxford is a place, that were it by character what it is by constitution, could not fail to throw a blaze of wholesome light that would lighten the Gentiles and be the glory of the people of Israel. Israel's was, without any question, the religion of the outward man, or under the physical laws, and it is well known how that nation fell into a state, which we may, for the sake of its apposite illustration, call " Popery," — i. e., a bigoted attention to the externals, adding to the forms, and multiplying the traditions, till at last the blessed Jesus himself said of them — " Ye do make the commandments of God of none effect by your traditions," Now, how any body of men can be governed and regulated without an express attention being paid to the physical, or to laws connected with the human, nature of the creature, is a theory which we cannot establish by bringing forward such instances as have stood the test of time, however persons may boast of the intellectual superiority of man's nature. In the constitution of our University we have, as plain as any thing can be, the Physical and the Spiritual Church united. Let our subtle sophists bring what arguments they please to account for the " how and wherefore," the facts are too positive for them to think of gainsaying them. We have not only on our armorial shield the Lion of Judah, the symbolic guardian of antient Israel, and the Lamb of God, the fulness of the spiritual Israel, but we have, in addition, our four and twenty elders, an union of the twelve sons of Israel, and the twelve apostles of the Lamb, being the type of the New-Testament Church ; and though we may smile incredulously, or sneer contemp tuously, at the idea of such a coincidence, from our knowledge of the four and twenty heads of houses in Oxford, who hold their weekly meetings for the well-being of their incorporated families, or tribes, that is no proof that the hand of God has not been stretched forth among us. It is to be feared that we are fast approaching a similar crisis to 17 that which was so fatal to Israel, when they had all the forms perfect, but all the beauty and the sweet savour of Christ departed. Israel's very language was the language of the physical man, and is in its constitution the simplest of all languages. But the enemy has been there as busy as it is now with the Greek language (the language of the intellectual man), and bound it up head and foot in the grave clothes of antient fathers. Israel was a people whose ceremonial was perfect, and laws com plete ; they had the essence of all those rites and traditionary observances which we trace in every nation under the sun, and as they had the ceremonial and moral so well defined in their records, there can be no plausible reason advanced wherefore they had not* * The symbols alluded to in the former parts of this work were taken from the different emblems combined in the fulness of that figure represented by the cherubim, and are types, not only of the family of Jacob, but of the entire redeemed body of the faithful of the Christian church. The antiquity and prevalence of Armorial bearings, among all nations, is so well known that no specific notice of them is necessary. The veneration attached to national ensigns in most empires is very extraordinary ; such as the Danish raven, the Roman eagle, the sun among the Eastern nations; but among the Israelites and Egyptians it amounted to idolatry. One of the first great crimes of Israel, in the wilderness, was the worship of one of these symbols — the Golden calf, or ox. The cherubim of the tabernacle were of a twofold character, both in relation to the temporal and spiritual interests of the antient people of God. They had the various appearances of a man, a lion, an eagle, and an ox, (see Exod. xxv. 18, &c. ; xxxvii. 7 ; also Chron. iii. 1 3, Sec. ;) such are the traditions of the Jewish writers, and such they are admitted to have been by Sir Isaac Newton, whose authority to men of science is almost equal to demonstration. (See Apoc. ed. 1753, p. 259 ; also Mede's works, 1677, p. 437.) Faber, in his Origin of Pagan Idolatry, has devoted much research to shew that the true emblems of the che rubim were the sources whence the heathen nations derived their idolatry, as manifested in the veneration paid to the bull, the lion, and the eagle. (See vol. i. chap. 6, 7. See also Thomas Maurice's Indian Antiquities — History of Hindostan — Ruins of Babylon, &c., passim.) And in the same way as various coloured stones formed the breastplate of the High Priest, and bore the names of the twelve sons of Israel, so did the various ensigns of the tribes partake of their colours as the grounds of their banners, according to the testimony of those authors who have jwritten on the department of the manners and customs of the Jews. And that the subject ought not to be lightly regarded by the followers of the Lamb, and the believers in the New Testament, may reasonably be inferred, from the positive allusion made to the same in that book, which has attached to it a blessing both in its introduction and its conclusion to all that hear and read therein ; even " the Revelation" of the " Lord Jesus Christ." There is an especial reference made to the foundation stones of the New Jerusalem,-as being of different hues, resembling those in the breastplate, in these words : — " And the building of the wall of it was of jasper ; and the city was pure gold, like unto clear glass. And the foundations of the wall of the city were garnished with all manner of precious stones. The first foundation was jasper ; the second, sapphire ; the third, a chalcedony ; the fourth, an emerald ; the fifth, sardonyx ; the sixth, sardius ; the seventh, chrysolite ; the eighth, beryl ; the ninth, a topaz ; the tenth, a chrysoprasus ; the eleventh, a jacinth; the twelfth, an amethyst." (Rev. xxi. 18, 20.) 18 civil symbols and regulations equally deserving of notice, especially as we have some alluded to in Scripture itself, and many handed down in their own hi.stories. That they must have been most wisely trained and regulated to march forth in such harmony and order as an army, we are forced to admit, without any attempt at surmise ; and that those symbols, signs, and signals, were necessary for ensuring due decorum and regularity in their movements. But that it was the case we are certain from the history of their march ; they all were marshalled according to their houses, and families, and tribes, every man by his own standard throughout their hosts. The Lord himself, in his instructions to Moses for their orderly pro cession, makes positive allusion to these standards and ensigns — " Every man of the children of Israel shall pitch by his own standard,* with the ensign of their father's house, far off about the tabernacle of the congregation shall they pitch,"(Num. ii. 2.) Then follows the order of their march. To dispute the wisdom of this were anything but the act of a sober-minded disciplinarian, and they that have had their eye opened with attention to see the well-disciphned troops of our physical soldiers must acknowledge, that the flag, the colours, the signal, the sound of the fife and drum, the trumpets and the cymbals, are all natural emblems, without which our military preeminence among the nations were but an empty name. And shall we set ourselves up to the world as an object meriting its just contempt ? Shall our learning carry us so far as to admit that all our symbols are shadows only, and our rites and ceremonies an empty form ? Shall the soldier re cently hiu-ried as a raw recruit from the midst of our ignorant popu lation, tell us the practical use of the flag-staff and the colours, &c., and we, furnished with the accumulated stores of the multiform learning of ages, affirm that we know nothing of the use of our symbols ? Shall we say we know nothing more of them except that they are handed down to us from our Fathers, and we permit them to remain among us, only because we set our faces against allthe innova tions of an age that is at least fifty years in advance of ourselves ? Truly, if it be so, we train up the youths entrusted to our guardian care to little effect, and need not be surprised at other Universities being founded in all directions ; for the honest Englishman will seek out for such places to educate his children as shall fit them for the exigencies of the times. It is, therefore, upon this unoccupied and despised spot of ground that the stand is taken, and not only Oxford, but Cambridge also (for the symbols of that University are equally deserving of notice), is called upon to prove that the signs held forth by them to the eye of the whole world are not attended to, because those that founded their Universities did not know what they were about ; neither the Physics of the one nor the Metaphysics of the other will suffice to prove their point, unless they build upon * To this passage there is an evident allusion made by the Apostle in the fif teenth chapter of the Corinthians, when he draws their attention to the awakening of the sleeping saints and the resurrection of their bodies from the dust, " every man in his own order," or by his own standard, or company — iv T(f iSini Taynart. 19 some other foundation than that which is laid, even the written word of God, whose fulness is Jesus Christ, God manifest in the flesh, and blessed for evermore.* Oxford is indeed, in the highest degree, an university of forms and ceremonies ; and so particular are the statutes with respect to any innovation, that a provision is made that there should be no alteration in the very vestments used in the academy, but that patterns of them be preserved in a vestry provided for that purpose, and in conse quence none of its members dare appear in public in any costume different from those there laid up. How far the Heads of the re spective Houses may have power to sanction any addition to the academical attire within their own walls is not so obvious, else we should not have heard of the custom introduced and tolerated in the St. Mary Magdalene College, and especially when its President is generally reported to be the most learned of all the doctors in the department of primitive historical theology. But in proportion as the ceremo nial of Oxford is based upon the laws of God in nature, which are unchangeable, so also her language, in her public capacity, is derived from the highest spiritual source, even from the fulness of Him that fiUeth all in all. Her degreesf are all conferred by a positive appeal to the only name given under heaven among men by which we must be saved, and they who cannot catch the words, or comprehend the language, used on those occasions, may notice the hands, at other times hanging down, lifted up, and the head uncovered on the part of the Vice Chancellor and the two Proctors, who exercise their delegated powers, and who alone enjoy the privilege of remaining with their heads veiled in the midst of that august assembly.^ And, however * The author of this pamphlet is prepared, as occasion may offer, to apply " the Key of the Lamb" to other subjects equally locked up in the museums of literature. Science, and theology. Whether he may succeed in his endeavour to recover the key of knowledge, so long buried in the rubbish, is a point which remains to be tried. t The great bell of St. Mary's church, on every degree day, still continues to do its duty by calling the great congregation ; while the little bell, equally un heeded, whenever the examinations are going on in the public schools, is heard as a memento of " the light of other days." As the custom of having the public service conducted in Latin, and the Lord's Supper administered in the same language, at the beginning of term, has recently been revived, and seems to be very much approved of, it would not be out of character for the University authorities to resort again to St. Mary's Church previous to the transaction of public business, or else give notice that the bell should be rung an hour earlier, serving the double purpose of satisfying the public as to the intention of the practice, as well as pre venting the vicar of the church from offending against the letter of the fifteenth canon. X (translation.) Then, the vice-chancellor placing the book upon their heads, shall say, " In honour of our Lord Jesus Christ, and for the advancement of holy mother church and of learning, I, by my authority, and by the authority of the whole university, give to thee (ot to you) permission to enter into the faculty of arts, (or into the faculty of law, of medicine, or of theology,) to read, to dispute, and to do all other things which belong to the degree of doctor, or master, in that faculty, when 20 others may feel disposed to cut and carve our statutes, and alter our ceremonies, the Confronter of the Popery of Oxford will not fail to stand up for them and defend them in their proper place, and expose whatever fallacy he may detect either in the physics or metaphysics of the degenerate Sons of wise Fathers. Plowever many of the readers may feel indisposed to coincide with the views of the author in respect to the subject of the symbols and armorial bearings, it does not appear probable that the party themselves will object to them, except in their being used against themselves. The Rev. J. H . New man may be looked upon as sustaining among other offices that of the Apostle of the symbols, as his new chapel at Littlemore is from time to time receiving fresh additions to its symbolical furniture. Since the writer first addressed himself to the public on the subject, various innovations of that description have been made ; some splen didly-gilt adornments (of carved wood) have been added to the altar-like table of communion, and its naked cross, — viz. two candle sticks (with their candles), from the patterns at Magdalene College, and a large paten in the centre, a neat desk of carved oak, to represent the black eagle, from which the lessons are read, besides sundry hiero glyphics of pelicans, &c.*, on the ornamental shields attached to the ends of the rafters in the roof, and the whole service partaking of the symbolical character of the Roman-cathohc ritual, the officiating minister turning at one time to the people, and gently lifting his hands in token- of the blessings conveyed; at other times, to the east, and bending towards the cross, makes the genuflexion, as in the chapels of the Roman Catholics to the present day, and all this to a large con gregation, and many of the members of the University of Oxford, both graduate and undergraduate. Such being the state of the times, it will furnish the present writer with ample materials for future elucidation, as he trusts he has not attended to the subject of symbols without being able to supply a key that shall open to the blind worshipper the hidden and true meaning of those emblems which they ignorantly idolize. The time may arrive when the Lord shall see fit to permit his servants to open, for the edification of his own people, the depths of that mysterious language of scripture which is written as a name, neither hidden from the wise nor made plain to the fleshly understanding, but, like the reve lation made to John, laid open by the Lamb of God to the mind that loves true wisdom and " searches," not reads, " the scriptures." The pubhc conduct of Oxford, as an University, has furnished a suf ficient number of facts to demonstrate the truth of the position assumed — viz., that the theology of the supporters of the " Tracts for the Times" is nothing else but the Popery of Oxford roused up from a thou hast (or, you have) performed those things which belong to such solemnity ; in the name of the Lord the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost," — the head being uncovered with due reverence whilst he pronounces these last words. Statutes, Addenda, p. 255. * It is reported among the villagers that " the pictures" were presented to their Vicar by Her most Gracious Majesty the Queen. 21 protracted slumber, and making a determined effort to recover the ground it had lost by the rapidity of the march of intellect. The species of popery complained of is an offshoot of the system of education adopted among us, not properly balanced and checked by the wisdom which is from above. By a calm contemplation of the systems of education adopted in our two Universities, it will be seen that each of them are conducted upon different principles — the one giving undue prominence to the Metaphysics, or high reasoning powers, the other to the Physics, or mathematical sciences. A refer ence to their class-lists and mode of examination will be sufficient to substantiate this fact. To condemn either in their proper place would be both theoretically unphilosophical as well as practically unsafe, — it would be like a separation of the reasonable soul from a body pre pared for it ; for the Perceptive faculties (exercised at Cambridge) furnish with materials, whilst the Reflectives (called into activity at Oxford) are necessary for the proper application of the same, accord ing to tha