3 9002 06773 8394 I8.U BEING AN ATTEMPT TO INDICATE TO THE STRANGER SOME OF THE MOST PROMINENT OBJECTS OP INTEREST IN THAT PLACE AND NEIGHBOURHOOD ; ILLUSTRATED BY 3&fstorital, JSiogtapSttal, attft awJftMtttral Notttea. BY THE REV. GEORGE ORNSBY, Licentiate in Theology, of Univ : CoU .* Durham, and Curate of tVhicJcham, in the Diocese of Durham* Arte, situque loci munlta Dunelmia, salve, Qua floret sauctae religionis apex. JDurfjam : GEORGE ANDREWS, SADDLER-8TREET. LONDON : WHITTAKBK & CO. MDCCCXLVI. PREFACE. A work like the present necessarily possesses no claim to originality ; the judgment which may be exercised in the art of compilation being almost the only merit which can attach to it. The title- page sufficiently explains its object, but the com piler feels it incumbent on him to advert more particularly to the sources from which has been drawn all that can render his book really valuable. The curious and interesting account of the " Rites and Monuments of the Monastical and Cathedral Church of Durham," published in 1672, by Davies of Kidwelly, has been often consulted, with a view to the illustration of the antient splendour of the Cathedral, and its monastic establishment. References will also be found to the valuable stores of information contained in Mr. Raine's " St. Cuthbert," and the " Brief Account of Durham Cathedral, &c," by the same author, — a little work of great interest. It was next to impossible to avoid trespassing in some degree upon ground already pre- occupied in the latter, and many coin cidences may be found which the Compiler of the following pages must hope that Mr. Raine will pardon. The general object of the two works is however distinct : one of the principal aims of the present publication being to give a descriptive iv. ' account of the architectural features of the Cathe dral, — a branch of the subject which did not appear to fall within the scope of Mr. Raine's design.* Care has been taken to make this account as accu rate as possible, and as specific as the limits of a guide-book will allow, although the Architect by profession will doubtless discover many deficiencies. Much assistance towards this part of the subject has been obtained from the " Architectural Illustrations of Durham Cathedral," lately published by Mr. Bil lings. For the numerous quotations which have been made from the writings of Surtees, no apo logy is offered. The little book now put forth may fall into the hands of many who have not the means of access to his costly volumes, and those who are acquainted with them will not re quire to be told that a selection from the many beautiful sketches of historical incident, individual character, and natural scenery, which adorn their pages, must add to the value of any work in which they are incorporated. The further aid of which the Compiler has availed himself, the reader will find acknowledged in the pages where it occurs. With what success the compilation of this little volume has been accomplished, it is for others to judge. Whickham, "August 7th, 1846. See Brief Account of Durham Cathedral, Sic, p. 36- CONTENTS. Introduction' .... The Cathedral .... The Choir .... The Nine Altars .... The Galilee The Monuments The Cloister The Library .... The Deanery, &c. The Castle .... The University The City and its Suburbs The Church of St. Mary in the North Bailey le-Bow .... The Church of St. Mary in the South Bailey The Banks .... The Church of St. Oswald The Church of St. Nicholas The Church of St. Giles The Chapel of St. Margaret The Neighbourhood op the City Neville's Cross .... Beaurepaire. Brancepeth Church and Castle The Priory of Finchale Lumley Castle .... Sherburn Hospital Pittingtoii Church Conclusion .... or St. Mary^ Page. 1 10 42 54 81 91 118 126130 156 158 159 162I6r 169 175177 177181182 185190191 192 192 VI. Appendix. I. Succession of Bishops, Priors and Deans of Durham II. University Fees, paiticulars as to Bishop Hatfield's Hall,&c III. List of Birds, Insects, and Plants found in the County of Durham .... .... .... IV. Bibliographical List relating to the County and City of Durham .... .... Index .... .... .... .... .,. . 217 221 ILLUSTRATIONS. Outer Gate of the Castle Sanctuary Knocker .... St. Cuthbert's Cross .... Monument of Dr. Britton Bp. Barrington Bp. Van Milldert Abbey Gateway Arms of the University . County Courts Kepyer .... Arms of the See Neville's Cross 11 18 71 105 .... 106 .... 115 .... 134 .... 152 165 ... 173 .... 176 .... 180 murrain, &c. When the rude Dane burn'd their pile The Monks fled forth from Itoly Isle : O'er northern mountain, marsh* and moor, From sea to sea, from shore to shore, Seven years Saint Cuthbert's corpse they bore. ***** Chester-le-Street and Ripon saw His holy corpse, ere Wardilaw Hail'd him with joy and fear ; And after many Wanderings past. He chose his lordly seat at last, Where his Cathedral huge and vast, Looks down upon the Wear ; There, deep in Durham's Gothic shade, His relics are in secret laid. Marm ion, c. 2, 14. The History of the City of Durham previous to its assuming an Ecclesiastical character is in deep obscurity, for until the time when it was made the final resting place of the wonder-working and incor ruptible body of St. Cuthbert, we have no record of its existence, except as the site of a few rude and scattered huts which were probably all by which it could be designated as a place of human habita tion in the midst of the deep woods by which it was surrounded. The Church of Lindisfarne, over which St. Cuthbert presided as her sixth Bishop, was the place of his first sepulture, but it having been plundered and burned by the Danes in one of B their early descents upon the coast, the fear of a second spoliation Jed Bishop Eardulph and his monks to abandon the place for ever, taking with them the body of their patron Saint, which then commenced its migrations. This took place at the beginning of Alfred's reign, about the year 875. Seven weary years did these holy men wander from place to place, until, under the auspices of Guthred, King of Northumberland, they took up their abode at Cuneacestre, (Chester-le-Street,) where they built a Cathedral, and received from Guthred the gift of all the land between Wear and Tyfle for a perpetual possession. Such was the commence ment of the "privileges and immunities, which eventually converted the patrimony of St. Cuthbert into a County Palatine, and exalted its Bishops to the High Estate of Temporal Princes, in few re spects amenable to the laws of the land, or inferior to the Kings under whom they lived."* At Chester-le-Street, they remained for one hun dred and thirteen years, at the end of which period (Anno 995) a second flight from the Danes be came necessary, and for a short time the Bishop and his monks took refuge with their holy burthen at Ripon. When peace was re-established, the Sanctuary of St. Wilfrid was abandoned, and they set out with the intention of returning to their for saken Cathedral. However, on arriving at a place which Symeon calls Wrdelau, and which has been supposed to be Wardenlau, an eminence com manding a full view of the vale of Wear, the ark in which the body of the Saint was conveyed be came obstinately fixed and immoveable. Exertions and entreaties alike failed to move the obdurate Saint, and although it was sufficiently manifest that he had insuperable objections to return to his * Raise's Saint Cuthbert, p. 48. former abode, they remained in profound ignorance whither he would please to be conveyed. In this dilemma, recourse was had to fasting and praying for three days, when Cuthbert was seen of Eadmer (one of the monks) in a dream, and his intention was communicated that they should bend their way to Dunhelm. Hither then they directed their course,, and here was the close of their weary wan derings. They found on the summit of the pen insula formed by the winding of the river Wear, a small portion of level and cultivated ground, where they erected a temporary tabernacle of boughs for the reception of the body of the Saint, until a church could be built for that purpose. The erec tion of this church, called the White Church, was speedily accomplished, the place was no longer soli tary, and a city quickly reared its head around the Sanctuary of St. Cuthbert. The White Church was probably only a rude wooden building, for we find that three years after this, St. Cuthbert was removed thence to a new Church of stone, which Aldhun, the Bishop, assisted by Uhtred, Earl of Northumberland, and all the population from Coquet to Tees, had during that time been engaged in building. This, in its turn, was super seded by the splendid structure which still survives, an enduring monument of the zeal and piety of our forefathers in raising temples to God worthy of the honour which is due to His Name : for though superstition unquestionably lavished much riches at the shrine of the Saint, it were unjust and ungenerous to their memory not to believe that a desire to glorify God was present in the hearts of many of those who assisted in rearing the lofty pile which still presents, in its massy strength, one of the noblest specimens of Norman Archi tecture which England can afford. " With massive arches broad and round, That rose alternate, row and row On ponderous columns, short and low. Built ere the art was known, By pointed aisle, and shafted stalk The arcades of an alley 'd walk To emulate in stone."* We shall have occasion afterwards, in our ac count of the Cathedral, to speak more particularly of the time of its erection and the names of the Prelates and Nobles who were especially concerned in the building of its various parts. To this period then we may refer the rise of the city of Durham, and although there are no remains about the Castle to which we can assign an earlier date than the time of William the Conqueror, yet it would appear to have had some fortifications previously ; for, we find in the twentieth year of Bishop Eadmund, (who was Aldhun's successor,) that an incursion of the Scots was successfully re pelled by the inhabitants, and the heads of severed of their leaders exposed on poles in the Market Place. Fearful as had been the miseries which Danish invasions and the incursions of the Scots had caused to the inhabitants of this district, the re cords of the Durham Historians contain a not less melancholy history of the ravages by fire and sword inflicted by the Norman Conqueror ere the northern provinces were reduced to subjection. After the death of Harold, Egelwin, who was then Bishop, acknowledged William as his liege lord ; but not withstanding this, the Conqueror found it neces sary to send Comyn, a Norman noble, to enforce his authority. He took possession of Durham at the head of 700 troops, and, in spite of the warn ings he had received on entering the Bishopric from Egelwin, disdained to offer any check to the * MAH J] ION, c. 2, 10. 5 reckless licence of his Norman soldiery. But his haughty confidence ended in dismay and death. The next morning's dawn beheld the enemy at the gates ; the soldiers, who were dispersed throughout the town, fell an easy prey to their assailants ; the house, in which Comyn took refuge, was set on fire, and he himself perished miserably in the flames. For this, William exacted a fearful retribution. He put himself at the head of his army to avenge the death of Comyn, and his march ' was traced in characters of blood;' for, between York and Durham, for sixty miles, every village was burned, neither age nor sex was spared, and even the sanctity of the cloister afforded no protection. Famine also added its horrors, and the necks of the people, subdued by misery, were at last bowed beneath the Norman yoke. On the death of Egel win, William conferred the See on Walcher, a native of Lorrain, whom he subsequently created Earl of Northumberland, and from this time we may probably date the commencement of those palatine privileges and that temporal jurisdiction which form so peculiar a feature in the history of Durham. The Church of Durham, as we have seen, had long been in the enjoyment of large territorial pos sessions, which continued to be increased by suc cessive benefactions. It is, of course, far beyond the limits of a work of this nature to give any thing like a detailed account of the various donations thus bestowed on the Church, or of the rise and progress of that temporal jurisdiction which was exercised in such plenitude of power by the Bis hops, as Counts Palatine, when the See was in its meridian splendour. To do this would involve a history of the successive Bishops of the See, which, of itself, would occupy more than the limits we have prescribed to ourselves. Incidental notices of the more eminent among the princely prelates who have swayed the sceptre of the Palatinate will occur, as we contemplate their tombs or admire the various portions of the noble fabric which tes tify their piety or munificence. It may be suf ficient, therefore, to state briefly what are the grounds for assuming that Walcher was the prelate by whom such temporal jurisdiction was first exer cised, what its privileges were when fully recognized under the sway of his successors, their subsequent curtailment, and their ultimate extinction. It does not appear that any peculiar power, such as we understand by a Palatine Jurisdiction, was exercised by the Bishops of Durham, previously to the Norman Conquest ; for, as Surtees observes,* " the silence of the Monkish Historians, authori ties certainly not unfavourable to the full extent of the ecclesiastical claims, as to the acquisition or assumption of such a franchise at that period, may be fairly considered as conclusive against its exist ence," and Walcher is the first Bishop, whom we find by any authentic proof, exercising that sovereignty which every successive Prelate, during four centuries, continued to wield with unlimited sway. It is not difficult to account for the policy of the Conqueror in delegating such powers to the hands of an ecclesiastic. Scotland was a restless and dangerous enemy, nor were there wanting those in the Northern Provinces of England, who ill- brooked the yoke of a Norman Conqueror, and who, in spite of the miseries they had sustained in resistance to his authority, were still sufficiently powerful to require the utmost vigilance on the part of their Conqueror to preserve his dominion, and it was a matter of absolute necessity that he should * Sokteeb's History of Durham, vol. 1., p. xv. have a vicegerent whose unlimited power should be adequate to crush the first risings of rebellion. To have vested such power in lay hands, would have been dangerous in the extreme. Their am bition would soon have led them to attempt the establishment of a separate and independent kingdom, and it is sufficiently apparent that the appointment of an ecclesiastic lord, whether as re garded the sanctity of his clerical character, or his more disinterested attachment to the Crown, was a course most likely to conduce to the peace of the district over which he ruled. It was, however, a fatal gift to its first possessor.* The powers thenceforward exercised by the Bishops, as Counts Palatine, may be best given in the words of Surtees.f " The paramount seigno- rial property in all lands, from which, according to the principles of the feudal system, arose the pri vileges of escheat, forfeiture, and wardship, and the possession of mines, wastes, forests and chaces ; the supreme jurisdiction, as well civil as military, the former exercised by the establishment of Courts of Law and Equity, the appointment of officers, and the levying of taxes and subsidies ; the latter by the power of array as well of ships as soldiers, together with a jurisdiction, as well along the coast as in the navigable and other waters, and the royal privilege of the Mint, were all included in this extensive franchise, of which the various branches were either generally or individually ratified by express confirmation or exception in various successive Acts of Parliament, or other matters of record of high and public authority." Till the reign of Henry VIII. these privileges continued in undiminished force and uninterrupted * See Subtees, vol. 1., p. xvil. f SUBTEES, VOl. 1., p. XVi. 8 possession. By an act, passed in the twenty- seventh year of his reign, the first blow was struck at the regalities, which, for centuries, had been enjoyed by the Counts Palatine. By this act the privileges of pardon and forfeiture, and the appoint ment of the justices of the peace, were taken away from the See ; and by the same act, all writs were directed to run in the name of the King. The last and final stroke, which for ever extinguished the ancient honours of the Prince Bishops of Dur ham, we ourselves have lived to see. On the death of Bishop Van Mildert, an act was passed whereby all temporal jurisdictions and privileges were declared to be for ever severed from the Bishopric of Durham. Bishop Van Mildert died on the 21st February, 1836, and was buried before the Altar in Durham Cathedral on the 1st March following. His funeral was solemnized with be fitting splendour, and the last Count Palatine was followed to his grave by an immense concourse of all ranks and degrees, actuated by the respect and reverence so justly due to his many virtues, and by a feeling, in the minds of many, akin to that with which we regard the obsequies of the last representative of an antient line ; for in him were terminated a name and privileges which were venerable with the hoar of centuries. "Hark! the knell! Durham, the uncrowned city, in meet grief Prepares to celebrate within the shrine The obsequies of her last Palatine; And nature's gloom is felt as a relief. * * * * * * The blameless prelate in the antique gloom Of the low western Galilee Is laid, In the dark pageantry of death arrayed, Nigh to the Venerable Beda's tomb: And in the distant east beside the shrine There is a grave, a little earth up-cast, Wherein to-day a rich and solemn Past Must be entombed with this old Palatine. See how with drooping pall and nodding plume In many a line along the misty nave The sombre garments of the clergy wave, Bearing the last Prince-Bishop to his tomb ! And, as the burden swayeth to and fro, I see a glorious relic, most sublime, A dread bequest from out the olden time, Borne from the earth with ceremonial show. To one old priest were Keys and Sceptre given, Two rights combined, the human and divine, Blended in one high office as a shrine Where earth might into contact come with Heaven : This homage of great times unto the Cross, All this magnificent conception, here Outstretched upon the Palatine's frail bier Is borne away ; and will men feel no loss ? The cloud of music hushed still loads the air ; The herald breaks the wand, while he proclaims The sainted Palatine's puissant names : Yon kingless throne is now for ever bare ! F. W. Faber. €#* (ffatfjetiral. "And holy Durham's Minster fair A crown of yellow rays did wear, And we beheld with rapture there, By sunset's powers Transfigured in the radiant air The two west towers." F. W. Fabeb. From whatever quarter the stranger approaches the City of Durham, its appearance is sufficiently striking. In our judgment however the view pre sented to the traveller as he enters from the North is perhaps the most imposing. The Cathedral and Castle here form a combination not easily equalled ; each rising, massive and lofty, from among the dim woods which clothe to the river's edge the rock on which they stand. And, were we asked to fix a time when the scene could best be ' visited aright,' it should be towards the close of a summer's day, while a farewell gleam of even ing light is yet lingering in the sky and gilding the pinnacles of the western towers, its shadows, at the same time, deepening into obscurity the foundations of the old heavy pile, and giving depth of effect to every coign and buttress of its massy walls : all the incongruities which might offend the eye in the broad glare of day being harmoniously blended and lost under the mellowing hues of ap proaching twilight. At such an hour, and for such a scene, we would pause a moment, before passing the ancient bridge which Bishop Flambard 11 built over the Wear, and which still forms the en- trance from the North to the City of Durham. Crossing this, and passing up the narrow street called Silver Street, which leads to the Market Place, we proceed towards the Cathedral. On our way thither, not many years ago would have been seen an old and venerable remnant of the defences of the Castle, namely the outer gate at the head of Sadler Street, built by Bishop Langley in the year 1417. For some time it was occupied as the County Prison, but now its arched portal and machicolated turrets survive only in the views of the Artist, and its site is occupied by the News Room of the Town. Passing onwards, we ascend Queen Street, and enter the Place Green, a large and spacious square, 12 having on its south side the Cathedral, on its north the Castle, and on the west the old Exchequer, a square massive building, which comprises within its walls the Palatine Court of Chancery, and chambers for the accommodation of the several Officers of the Palatinate Courts and the preser vation of the records of the See. Its general cha racter has been altered at different periods, but its low-browed archway, and the shield of arms over head, surmounted by the Bull of Westmoreland, enable us to attribute its erection to the episco pate of Bishop Nevill, about 1438. Adjoining it is Bishop Cosin's library, the lecture rooms of the University, and the registry of the Consistory Court, which was built upon the site of the old County Courts, in the year 1820. On the east side of the square is a range of buildings, on whose gables two mouldering shields, with in scriptions, which are almost illegible, beneath them, remain to testify that they were alms-houses found ed by the munificence of Bishop Cosin on the ruins of Cardinal Langley's song-school. They are now inhabited by the Students of the Univer sity, and their former occupants have been trans ferred to a new dwelling, of appropriate character, which has recently been erected at the head of Queen Street. The rest of the buildings on this side of the square, with one exception, have become the property, and are occupied by the members of the University. To a more detailed account of the Castle, and some of the other buildings which have been men tioned, we shall hereafter return. The Cathedral now demands our attention. Separated from the square, on the south side, by a low wall, which forms the boundary of the grave yard, the Cathedral towers in stately magni- 13 ficence, presenting to the beholder the whole of its northern elevation in one unbroken and impos ing view. And although the hand of restoration which, with more zeal than knowledge, was at work some half a century ago, has failed to retain the distinctive characteristics which belonged to some of its parts, and has introduced some few architec tural anomalies and incongruities, yet the general effect of its grand and majestic outline it was im possible to destroy. This still remains, though Roman cement has been permitted to encase the upper stage of the lanthorn tower, and the chisel has mercilessly pared down the strings, and mouldings, and buttresses, and sculptured capitals and figures, which, in their bold projection, added richness to the details of the building, and, in the Norman character which belonged to most of them, gave that harmony to its elevation which the commin gling of tracery and ornaments belonging to different periods must always of necessity destroy. Among the most striking instances which suggest them selves, are the alterations which were made in the north front of the middle transept, where two figures in roundels, over the great window, which are said to have represented Priors Forcer and Castell, have been supplanted by a figure of Bishop Pudsey, taken from his episcopal seal, and a sitting figure, which has been well said to be more .like a Dutch Burgomaster than a Prior in his chair ; for this is supposed to have been the sculptor's aim in the carving in question. In the pediment above these roundels a series of niches have superseded the Norman strings which once formed its cha racteristic ornament : the Norman character, likewise, of the turrets of this part of the building was materially injured by an injudicious admix ture of work belonging to a much later period. 14 We must not forget to notice moreover the carving of the Bun Cow, at the north west end of the eastern transept, or chapel of the Nine Altars, the traditionary circumstances connected with which have so long been identified with the name of Durham Abbey in the minds of all who have been bred and born within the limits of ' the Bishopric' For the benefit of others, however, we may tell the story. St. Cuthbert, as we have already told our readers, was long undetermined as to the place of his final repose. At last, how ever, it was " revealed to Eadmer, a virtuous man, that he should be carried to Dunholme, where he was to be received to a place of rest. His follow ers were again in great distress, in not knowing where Dunholme lay ; but as they proceeded, a woman wanting her cow called aloud to her companion to know if she had seen her ? who answered, she was in Dunholme. This was an happy and heavenly sound to the distressed monks, who thereby had intelligence that their journey's end was at hand, and the saint's body near its resting place."* The walls of Bishop Aldhun's Cathedral were, in consequence, adorned with a sculpture of the two women and the cow ; nor was the miracle suffered to fall into oblivion by any lachesse on the part of those who reared the pile which now occupies the site of Aldhun's Church. A like carving was set up by Bishop Flambard, but this, or perhaps rather the one which was co-eval with the erection of the Nine Altars, was destroyed at the time of the restoration of which we have spoken, " and was, in conse quence, replaced by the present good pointed cow of the short horned breed, attended by the two * Antiquities of the Abbey or Cathedral Church of Durham, Edited bv Pat. Sanderson, p. 64. ' 15 portly dames, arrayed in the costume of the late reign, (Geo. III.) who are standing by her side."* No record, however, of the legend we have related, occurs in any of the early historians of Durham, and it has therefore been presumed, with much proba bility, that the sculpture was merely intended to typify the rich possessions of the see "non Divitis uber agri, Dunelmiceque opulentia deerit" As Surtees says, " the sculpture may, after all, as probably have given rise to the legend, as the legend to the sculpture." The great window at the North end of the middle transept, which has been mentioned, oc cupies the place of the original Norman one, and was inserted by Prior Forcer, and restored, in accordance with its original construction, by Prior Castell, at the latter end of the fifteenth century. All the other Norman windows of the aisles of the nave and choir, with those of the clerestory, and triforia, excepting the windows of the triforium of the north aisle of the choir, and the narrow clere story windows of the east side of the transept, have been filled up with mullions and tracery, belonging to different periods. Some faint marks, which are more clearly indicated on the south side, remain to show that the windows of the triforia were, originally, dormer windows, each under its separate gable. This must have added greatly to the picturesque effect of the roof. The western towers, like the rest of the exterior, have materially changed their appearance since the restorative process was begun. In Hutchinson's time, a low battlement surrounded the top, but this has been replaced by open parapet work and pinnacles, with Italian mouldings. The towers * Maine's St. Cuthbert, p. 55. 16 originally terminated in wooden spires of consider able height, covered with lead, which are said to have been removed about 1667. The restoration of the great central tower was not commenced until the completion of the repairs of the north front and of the western towers, and its original character was more carefully attended to than that of any other portion of the building which we have been considering. To this we must always except the architect's unhappy pre dilection for Roman cement, the colour of which so ill accords with the stone work below, that, at first sight, we are apt to regard the upper stage of the tower as a completely modern addition. There is no trace of the existence of any part of the original Norman tower, which was, probably, of no great elevation. The whole of the present tower is in the perpendicular style, and there appears to be some reason for attributing its erec tion to the time of Prior Bell, (1464-1478).* The graceful canopied niches which adorn the sides and buttresses were each, of old time, occu pied by the figure of a saint, or a bishop, but these were taken down during its reparation, and, with the exception of some at the east side, have never been replaced. Many of them, however, have been preserved, and are now ranged, a grim and silent company, in St. Cuthbert's shrine. The great entrance to the church was originally, as was usual, at the western end ; but its magni ficent Norman arch is no longer visible externally, being concealed by the Galilee chapel, which was built by Bishop Pudsey, against that extremity of the Cathedral. In consequence of this the nor thern door-way has long formed the principal entrance to the church. Much tasteless alteration, * See Billings's Architectural Illustrations of Durham Cathedral, p. 37. 17 and many incongruous additions, have destroyed its character and peculiar associations. The door way is deeply recessed, with a succession of nook shafts, with Norman capitals, supporting concentric arches with zig-zag and plain roll mouldings. These remain, for the most part, uninjured, but enriched (?) by an additional moulding, with crock ets, terminating in a finial, of the decorated period. The pediment, above the arch, is panelled in an equally discordant style, nor is the effect at all redeemed by its flanking turrets with their lofty pinnacles. From the elevation given by Hutchin son, (taken in 1780,) it would appear that at that period, a pediment rose above the arch, somewhat higher than the roof of the north aisle. Within this was a pointed arch, and two small windows giving light to chambers above the doorway. The use of these chambers is associated with the antient privilege of sanctuary. They were occupied by two men, whose business it was to admit fugitives claim ing sanctuary, at any hour of the day or night, and to give notice of their admission by tolling the Gali lee bell, " that whosoever heard it, might know that some had taken sanctuary."* The sanctuary of St. Cuthbert extended to the church and church-yard and its circuit, and it is probable that some degree of security was afforded to those who came within even a certain distance of these limits. At Bever ley the privilege extended for a mile every way from the church, and this outward boundary was indicated by stone crosses, in convenient situations. The crosses which are known to have existed at the extremity of some of the streets leading out of Durham, were in all likelihood erected for the same purpose. The basement stone of one of them still remains, in a small planted enclosure * Sanderson's Antiquities, &c. 18 on the right of the great south -road, a little way beyond St. Oswald's church. Offenders seeking refuge, gave notice by knocking at the north door, of which we have spoken. The large knocker, which still projects in bold and striking relief from the door, is, doubtless, the same which was used for that purpose, for its details are of a Nor man character, and very similar in design to many of the grotesque ornaments which occur in illu minations of the period. After being admitted, they were commanded to " keep themselves within the sanctuary ; that is to say, within the church and church-yard, and every one of them to have a gown of black cloath/made with a cross of yellow, called St. Cuthbert's cross, set 19 on the shoulder of his left arm, to the intent, that every one might see there was such a privi- ledge granted by God unto St. Cuthbert's shrine, for all such offenders to flye unto for succour, and safeguard of their lives, until such time as they might obtain their Prince's pardon ; and that they should lye within the church, or sanctuary, within a grate, adjoyning to the Galilee door, on the south side. And likewise they had meat, drink, bedding, and other necessaries, for thirty-seven dayes, at the charge of the house, such as were meet and necessary for such offenders, till such time as the Prior, and the convent could get them conveyed out of the diocese."* The register of persons claiming sanctuary at Durham, has recently been published, by the Sdrtees' Society, and contains many curious and interesting entries. The last recorded claim for protection is dated September 10, 1524. The same volume also contains the Sanctuarium Beverlacense, being a similar record kept in the church of Beverley. The advantages which places of sanctuary afforded in troubled times, have been expressed by Hallam, in words of so much truth and beauty, that we cannot re frain from quoting them : — " Under a due ad ministration of justice, this privilege would have been simply and constantly mischievous ; as we properly consider it to be, in those countries where it still subsists. But in the rapine and tumult of the middle ages, the right of sanctuary might as often be a shield to innocence, as an impunity to crime. We can hardly regret, in reflecting on the desolating violence which prevailed, that there should have been some green spots in the wilderness where the feeble and the persecuted could find re fuge. How must this right have enhanced the * Davies's Rites and Monuments, p. 71, ed., 1672. 20 veneration for religious institutions ! How gladly must the victims of internal warfare have turned their eyes from the baronial castle, the dread and scourge of the neighbourhood, to those venerable walls, within which not even the clamour of arms could be heard to disturb the chaunt of holy men, and the sacred service of the altar."* Through this ancient portal then, within whose doors so many beating hearts must have sought re fuge and repose, some laden with the consciousness of crime, others trembling at the thought that inno cence itself was no defence against false accusers, unless the church interposed her sheltering arm, we enter the Cathedral : — and ' nave and choir and aisle unfold their awful perspective to the asto nished eye.' And, assuredly, his feelings are not to be envied who can take his stand at the western end of the nave of this noble building, and con template unmoved the lengthening array of massive columns, with their high o'er-arching roof, " Stretching in aisles majestical ; In branchings of embowering length, And avenues of pillar'd strength," and terminating in the more graceful lines of the groining of the choir, and the magnificent marigold or Catherine window of the chapel of the Nine Altars. The effect, indeed, is somewhat marred by the intervention of the choir screen and organ, which, in their debased Italian style, but ill accord with the stern simplicity and ma jestic grandeur of the building. But where there is so much to admire, and so much to elevate the mind, in the air of deep solemnity and holy calmness which seems to pervade the whole, it were unwise to dwell, at such a moment, with a captious and peevish spirit, upon the compara- * State of Europe in the Middle Ages, chap, ix, part I., vol. ill, p. 351. 21 tively trifling incongruities which may present themselves to the eye, how much soever their re moval may be wished, when a more detailed and particular survey is made. Rather let us exclaim, in the words of one, who has written, wisely and well, " They dreamt not of a perishable home, Who thus could build. Be mine, in hours of fear, Or grovelling thought, to seek a refuge here Where bubbles burst, and folly's dancing foam Melts, if it cross the threshold ; where the wreath Of awe-struck wisdom droops." The massiveness and grandeur, indeed, of this magnificent example of Norman architecture, can not fail to impress every beholder. Even Johnson himself, although physical incapacity rendered him less accessible to the charms of nature or of art, appears to have been powerfully struck with the appearance of this edifice. *' Rocky solidity and indeterminate duration," are the characteristic expressions he uses to portray the ideas it is calcu lated to convey. But it is time to view things more in detail. The ground plan of the Church, properly so called, is in the usual form of a Latin cross, com prising the nave and aisles, the middle transept, and the choir, the eastern extremity of which ori ginally terminated in a circular apse. This is super seded by the eastern transept, or Chapel of the Nine Altars. There are aisles on each side of the choir, and one on the eastern side of the middle transept. The general dimensions of the building are as follow : — Length of the whole from east to west 413ft. 10in., and including the Galilee 502ft., length of the nave 205ft. 4in., width of the nave and aisles 81ft. lin., middle transept 17lft. 9in. in length by 33ft. 7in., length of the choir 127ft. by 32ft. 8in., eastern transept or Chapel of the Nine 22 Altars 129ft. 5in. in length by 34ft. 2in. The projections of the western towers form what may perhaps be called a western transept, extending across that extremity of the nave. In the centre of this is the arch of the great western doorway, which continued to give access to the Church from the Galilee, down to the time of Cardinal Langley, by whom it was built up. The two doors which now form the entrances to the Galilee at each end of the aisles, are of his work, as is testified by the shields of arms which fill up the spandrils of the arches. The great window over the original door way was inserted by Prior Forcer, between 1341 and 1374. The stained glass which once filled its beautiful tracery is gone. One or two little frag ments only remain. What must have been its splendour, when the rays of the setting sun, as they gleamed through it, were "dyed In the soft chequerings of a sleepy light," when its beams illuminated " the whole story of the Root of Jesse, in coloured glass, very lively pictured and wrought in colours, with Mary and Christ in her arms on the top of the said window, in most curiously coloured glass."* The interior of the great north doorway, by which we entered the Church, still presents much curious sculpture, adorning the whole of its arch and columns, though, from the perishable nature of the stone, a good deal of it is obliterated, es pecially its lower portion. A more perfect exam ple of similar decoration may be seen by directing the eye to the opposite doorway, on the southern side of the Nave. This, as well as the north door, was the work of Bishop Pudsay, and is an inter- * Davies's Rites and Monuments. 23 esting specimen of the best period of Norman work. The capitals of the columns, which are themselves richly ornamented, are adorned with elaborately sculptured interlacing foliage, and those grotesque intertwining animals which are the com mon architectural ornaments of this period. The label of the arch is decorated with a series of roundels, at regular intervals, between each of which is a row of leaves. The centre roundel is occupied by a grotesque face, and the rest are al ternately filled by a flower and an animal. The iron work on the outside of this door ought not to pass unnoticed. It is a perfect and excellent spe cimen of that kind of decoration, and of the same date as the doorway. Attached to the pillar, nearest the font, which faces us on entering, was a Holy water stone of blue marble, but of this, as might be expected, no traces remain.* It had "a beautiful screen of wainscot," we are told, " finely painted with blue and little gilt stars."f Fresh water was provided every Sunday morning for the use of the towns men. Another Holy water stone stood near the south door for the use of the Prior and Convent. Between this pillar and the corresponding one on the southern side of the nave, is to be seen in the pavement the Boundary Cross, of blue mar ble, which indicated the limits, beyond which no female foot might stray in the direction of the sacred body of St. Cuthbert. " Would ye the distant days recall Of superstition's reign? Go, search the storied pavement round In Durham's massy fane. * There are some few examples of Holy water stoups or stones still in exis tence. The Church of Bywell St. Andrew in Northumberland, possesses one. t Davibs's Rites and Monuments. 24 Where lifts the blessed font on high Its rich embroidered cone, Between the northern cloister- port: And Holy water stone; There still is traced the bounding line Monastic rigour drew, — Weak barrier now 'gainst female foot,— A cross of marble blue." The legendary history of the Saint attributes the cause of this exclusion to a false accusation which was brought against him of dishonour done to a Pictish maiden, from which however he vindicated himself by causing the earth to open, and swallow her up in the presence of all the beholders. Female curiosity, nevertheless, sometimes dared to overpass the boundary assigned. An amusing history is related by Reginald, a monk of Durham and the writer of the life and miracles of St. Cuth bert, concerning an attempt of this nature. David, King of Scotland, (who died 1153) on his road home from England with his fair bride Maud, daughter and heiress of Waltheof, Earl of Hunting don, tarried at Durham with his bridal train to offer gifts and homage at the shrine of the holy Cuthbert. The Queen and her attendants essayed to enter the Church, but on being informed by the monks of the Saint's misogyny, she prudently retir ed and desired her maidens to follow her example. Helisend, her chief tire-woman, however, was not to be thus balked, but having possessed herself, either by stealth, or by the influence of bright eyes and a wheedling tongue, of the hood and cowl of a monk, she proceeded in that disguise, to make a survey of shrine, and altar, and embroidered vestments and costly offerings, hitherto unseen by female eye. Not long, however, was this per mitted to go on. The Saint presently appeared to the Sacrist, who was sitting writing in the clois ter, and commanded him to set off without a mo- 25 ment's delay, and turn out the disturber of his repose. Off went the Sacrist, and with a torrent of objurgations (which for the sake of the poor girl's ears we may hope were uttered in the lan guage in which Reginald gives us the story) drove her out of the " mansion of blessedness," as he calls it, which she had so wantonly defiled. The unlucky tire-woman, as might be expected, was frightened out of her senses, and was made so sen sible of the odiousness of her offence, that she proved her penitence by taking the veil in the Convent of Elstow, near Bedford, where', as we have the satisfaction of learning, her tears and contrition at last obtained the forgiveness of the offended Saint. Two women from Newcastle, also, " by instigation of the devil and attempt te merarious," made an endeavour, arrayed in mas culine attire, to gratify themselves with a sight of St. Cuthbert's shrine. This happened about the beginning of the 15th century. They were dis covered however, and " dree'd their penance" for it in the Churches of St. Nicholas and All Saints in the garb in which they had hoped to escape detection. "The real origin, however, of St. Cuthbert's dislike to women," says Raine* *' was the abominable conduct of the monks and nuns of Coldingham. Their enormities had proceeded to such an extent, that when their monastery was destroyed by fire, a short time before Cuthbert was consecrated, it was considered as a visitation from Heaven, on account of their sinful lives. It was on this account that females were prohibited from sojourning in the Church of Lindisfame, and the same rule was subsequently observed at Durham." The font is a basin of white marble, on an ascent of two steps. A lofty canopy of tabernacle work * St. Cuthbert, p. 36. D 26 in oak rises above it, supported by four pillars of of the same material, with corinthian capitals. The whole is of the mixed or debased style which prevailed in the 17th century. The work has been attributed to Dean Hunt, who died in 1638, but it is more probably of the same date as the stall work in the Choir, for it is scarcely likely that the one which he erected would escape the fate of the old wood work of the Choir, which was burnt by the Scotch prisoners after the battle of Dunbar, in 1650, and renewed by Bishop Cosin after the Restoration. The appearance, moreover, of the present font and its decorations, does not corres pond with the account given of it in 1634, by a person who visited Durham in that year : — " a font not to be paraleled in our land, it is 8 square, wth an iron grate rays'd 2 yardes every square, wtn in is a fayre ascent of diverse steps, the cover opens like a four quartered globe, the stone is of branch'd marble, and the story is that of St. John baptizing our blessed Savior, and ye foure Evange lists curiously done, and richly painted, wth in the globe all about so artificially wrought and carved wth such variety of Joyners work as makes all the beholders thereof to admire."* From this point we have a full view of the nave, which with its aisles, was carried up to the height of the vaulting during the episcopate of Bishop Flambard, who died in 1128. After his death the see remained vacant for five years, during which time the aisles were vaulted and the nave covered with a roof of wood. There are five clustered * Extracted from a MS. in the Lansdowne Collection in the British Mu seum, entitled "aRelationof a short Survey of Twenty-six Counties, briefly describing the Cities and their Scytuations, and the Corporate Townes and Castles therein: observ'd in a Seven weekes Journey begun at the City of Norwich, and from thence into the North,— on Monday, August 11th, 1634, and ending at the same place. By a Captaine, a Lieutenant, and an Ancient ; all three of the Military Company in Norwich." 27 piers on each side of the nave, including those which support the western side of the lanthom tower. The great triple columns of these piers are carried up nearly as high as the arches of the triforia, their clustered capitals and the Norman brackets between them forming the points d'appui for the springing of the vaulting. Alternating with these, to the eastward of the Boundary Cross, are round massive columnar piers. They are all ornamented with deeply channeled furrows, in various forms, longitudinal, zig-zag, and net work. The capitals of the piers have no remark able features . The mouldings of the arches have the zig-zag ornament and square billet labels. Above these arches, on each side, is the Triforium, consist ing of a uniform range of semicircular arches, with zig-zag mouldings, springing from low clustered pillars, filled up by double open arches with plain mouldings, divided by a single shaft. Over this is the Clere-story, the windows of which, on the north side, were filled up with mullions and tracery when that front of the building was restored. A passage runs along its whole length, having a series of triple arches open to the nave. Their shafts are all of equal height, but the middle divisions, as is usual, are about twice the width of the sides, and their arches considerably higher. The string course of the triforium is flat, that of the clere-story has the zig-zag ornament. The nave, as we have already stated, was origi nally covered with wood, a plan which was probably adopted on account of the expence which attended stone vaulting, which would undoubtedly have formed its covering, if the Architect's intentions had been carried into execution, as they were with the aisles, the groining of which is co-eval with the con struction of the building. The wooden roof re- 28 mained until the time of Prior Melsonby, between 1233 and 1244, and to his taste and skill we owe the construction of the remarkable vaulting which now forms the covering of the nave and south transept. At the time he lived, the early English style of architecture exclusively prevailed, and when, as was often the case at this period, a groined roof was super-added to Norman walls, all the details were in the style of the time, of which indeed we have an example in the choir of Durham itself. In that portion of the building, however, which we are now considering, although the arches are pointed, we have the singularity of their details pre senting a strictly Norman character ; the zig-zag ornament prevailing throughout. This gives great harmony of effect to the general view, and would lead a casual observer to the conclusion that it was all the work of one period, but if the attention be directed to the vaulting of the aisles throughout the Church, and of the north transept, which was the work of the Norman architects, a considerable difference will be observed to prevail, the mould ings of their arches and groinings being uniformly plain. A Norman arcade, with intersecting arches runs round the whole of the inner walls of the aisles and transepts, and the western end of the nave. The portion of it which was removed when Cardinal Langley opened his doorways into the Galilee, was carefully devoted to the purpose of filling up the great west door. The floor of the Church is nearly about its ori ginal level, and was laid down in its present regu lar pattern, about the time when the restoration of the northern exterior was commenced with. To preserve the uniformity of the pavement many of the monumental slabs were destroyed, and those which were suffered still to exist were no longer 29 permitted to cover the remains of those whose resting places they were intended to indicate, but were dragged into corners with an irreverence and carelessness which we may be permitted to de plore. We shall hereafter contemplate in detail the monuments, antient and modern, and the se pulchral memorials which are worthy of notice. Besides the holy-water stoup, with its " screen of wainscot," which we have already noticed, the north aisle contained an altar, between the two piers on the left hand as we turn from the north door in the direction of the Galilee, dedicated to our Lady of Pittie," enclosed on each side with wainscot, with the picture of our Lady supporting our Saviour, on her knee, as he was taken from the Cross."* The name is obviously taken from the circumstances under which she was represented in the painting. The mention of a Madonna della Pieta will recall to the minds of many the repre sentations by the old Italian Masters of the Blessed Virgin weeping over the dead body of the crucified Saviour. Another altar stood nearly opposite, called St. Saviour's altar. The eastern extremity of this aisle was enclosed with trellis work, which was spiked with iron and carried up nearly as high as the vaulting. It had folding doors, which were only opened to admit the passage of the processions which took place on the high festivals of the Church . No remains of painted glass occur in any of the win dows of this aisle. Their tracery was restored in tolerable conformity with its original perpendicular, character, about 1660, when the Cathedral was repaired, by Dean Barwick. In the south aisle, immediately opposite to our Lady of Pittie's altar, and between the correspond ing pillars, was an altar, which from its possessing * Sanderson's Antiquities, &c. 30 a rood, or crucifix, representing our Saviour with the crown of thorns, and his hands bound with cords, was denominated the altar of the Bound Rood. It was also enclosed on each side with wainscot. Adjoining to the Galilee door, at this end of the aisle, was the Grate, where offenders lay, who had taken sanctuary, (see p. 18.) The " Grate" was probably a sort of railed enclosure at this end of the Church, within which were pallet beds for their reception, during the time they were allowed to remain in sanctuary. Great part of this aisle was enclosed and occupied as a place of sepulture by the great family of Neville of Raby, and appears to have been known as the Neville Porch or Chapel. A wall extended across its eastern end, close to the cloister door, within -which was an altar where mass was daily sung by a chantry priest for the repose of the souls of its founder and his family. Over this wall was a par tition of wainscot. Its limits to the west were defined by another wall, on the top of which was a trellis work of iron, and a railing of the same mate rial separated it from the Nave. The great altar- tombs of the Nevilles which now stand between the pillars of the nave, and the blue marble slab of Bishop Neville, once richly adorned with brass, originally occupied the centre of this enclosure. The great perpendicular window which lights the south eastern corner of what was the Neville chapel was inserted by Prior Wessyngton. According to his account roll, which is now in the Treasury, it cost £30. Its compartments were filled with paint ed glass, representing the figures of St. George and the Dragon, St. Oswald, the Blessed Virgin, St. Cuthbert in his episcopal robes, and St. Christopher with his holy burden. The window next to it, towards the east, over the cloister door, is of the 31 decorated period, and was probably inserted by Prior Forcer. The rest of the windows of this aisle are perpendicular, and, like the large one we have mentioned, were all richly adorned with stained glass, but Puritan hatred to " superstitious pictures" has been here also, and the portraitures of " Martyr, and King, and sainted Eremite" no longer glimmer through their stone-work. A few shields, in the upper compartments of the windows, with their well-known bearing of a sal- tire argent on its field gules, and the fragment of a border, ensigned with a repetition of the Bulmer f), still remain to associate the memories of the proud Nevilles with the spot where they were ga thered to their fathers. Behind the wall at the eastern end of the Ne ville Chapel was a small chamber, which was occupied by the person whose duty it was to ring the bells at midnight. The cloister door at this end of the aisle opened into a sort of covered porch, projecting into the Church, made of wain scot, curiously painted with blue, and decorated with gilt stars. There was a Holy-water stone at this door also, which appears to have been pro tected from dust or dirt by a rich and curiously adorned and gilded canopy. We are apt to associate so much of what is grand and imposing with the solemnities and ac companiments of the Romish worship, that we are often tempted to regret that so little is left to us of canopied screen, and rich painting and gilding, and curious tabernacle work, which surrounded and adorned their shrines and altars. And so far as the Altar is concerned, we may surely be allowed to mourn over the wanton and mischie vous havoc which Puritanism made of the stately garniture which forms no more than a fitting 32 adornment for the place where Holy Mysteries are celebrated : but, as a mere matter of taste, apart from the superstition which led to their erection, we cannot regret the removal of the mul titude of altars, with their screens and almeries, which filled up (for we cannot regard them as em bellishing) transept and aisle and nave. Many curi ous specimens of antient art have doubtless perished with them, but no one who has seen a foreign Ca thedral, and has observed how they interfere with the unity of the original design, will hesitate to receive in exchange the lengthening perspective of one of our * long drawn aisles,' undefiled and un- clogged by these adventitious excrescences, and displaying, from base to capital, all the beautiful proportions of its clustered columns. Let us now return to the Nave. In its original state it was separated from the transept by a high stone wall, extending from pillar to pillar at its eastern extremity, on the west side of which was an altar, called Jesus' Altar. On each side of the altar were doors into the transept. The decora tions of this altar appear to have been of a very splendid character. It was enclosed, on each side, with carved wood work richly painted and gilded, and the partition wall itself was adorned with sculptured representations of the history of our Lord, and figures of the twelve Apostles. It was, in fact, the Rood Screen of the Church, for, sur mounting its carved parapet, " artificially wrought in stone, with marvellous fine colours, and gilt, with branches and flowers," stood the image of the Redeemer on His Cross, with Mary on one side and St. John on the other, attended by " two glittering archangels." Some idea of the charac ter of these partition walls with their ornamented parapets, may be formed from the one still in 33 existence which separates the south aisle of the Choir, from what is now the Virgers' Vestry. We may form some notion too of the style of the wood work about this and the other altars in the church from the remains, of similar workmanship and material, which are still to be seen in the Galilee, on the spot where the altar of the Virgin was placed in that building. Prior Castell, the builder of the Abbey Gateway, now better known by the name of the College Gates, was buried in the middle of the nave, before Jesus' altar, under a marble slab inlaid with brass. No traces of this remain. Castell was Prior at the death of King Henry VII. His private register contains a poem upon the death of that monarch, which in all probability was his own composition. The opening stanza may not be uninteresting as a specimen of the poetry of the period. " O wavering world all wrapped in wretchidness, What avales thy pompes so gay and gloryous, Thy pastymes, thy pleasors and all thy riches, Syth of necessitie they be but transitoryous ; Example but late, O to much pyteous ! The puyssaunt prince that yche man whilome dred, Maugre thy myght by naturall lyne and cours, Henry the Seventh, alas ! alas I lyeth dede." We now enter the transept, and stand beneath the great middle tower, or lanthorn. It is sup ported by four large clustered Norman piers with round arches. Nothing remains, as we have already observed, of the original Norman super structure, nor have we any account of the height to which it was carried. As regards the existing tower, there is some difficulty in reconciling the statements which attribute the building of the lower stage to Bishop Farnham (1241-1257), and the belfry to Prior Derlyngton (1258-1274), with 34 its present appearance, which from the corbel table upwards, belongs clearly to the perpendicular period. There is no portion of the existing tower which coincides with Bishop Farnham's period, and the only conclusion to which we can come is, that his work, and Prior Derlyngton's addition, each had reference to the " Galilee Steeple," or north-western tower. The Norman tower proba bly remained, at all events, until after 1446, for in that year we find a letter to the Bishop from Prior William de Ebchester and the Convent, giving a most woeful account of its ruinous condi tion. It had suffered from fire about sixteen years before, and had received some reparation, which does not, however, appear to have been of a very durable character ; for the Prior represents the walls as being completely out of the perpen dicular, and expresses great apprehension, lest, in the event of its fall, which every high wind makes them dread, the choir should be involved in its ruin. In all likelihood, it was altogether taken down not long after this, and the present tower commenced. If not begun by Prior Bell, as Mr. Billings supposes,* the work was at any rate carried on by him, for in 1474 we find him mentioning "the re-edification of our steeple," and complaining that lack of funds proved an ob stacle to its completion. A gallery, with an open parapet, pierced in quatrefoils, is carried round the interior of the lower stage of the lanthorn, at the height of 7-7 feet from the pavement. It rests upon corbels, which are alternately ornamented with grotesquely sculptured heads. Each side of the gallery has a door, with an ogee canopy, crocketed and termi nating in a finial, with a neck moulding. They * Architectural Illustrations of Durham Cathedral, p. 37. 35 communicate respectively with the roofs of the nave, transepts and choir. The string course at the base of the panelling runs around the sides on a level with the spring of the doorway arches. Among its ornaments are a bell and a mermaid, which in some measure seem to identify it as the work of Prior Bell. He was afterwards Bishop of Carlisle, and a mermaid is sculptured on the stalls of Carlisle Cathedral, which were executed in his time.* The panelling ascends as far as the base of the great windows. Each panel is in two divi sions, with plain arches, cinquefoiled, under a crocketed canopy terminating in a finial. Between the panels are slightly projecting buttresses, the faces of which are also panelled. They have tri angular crocketed heads and terminate in a pinna cle, which is carried up to the height of the canopy. Above the upper string course of the panelling, which is ornamented with the square flower, and the tudor rose, that favourite ornament of the perpendicular period, runs a broad border of squares, enclosing quatrefoils. Above this, on each side, are two lofty windows, with a narrow division between them. The windows are all of two lights, divided by a transom. The transom heads are cinquefoiled, under an ogee arch, and the upper lights under a plain arch. The secondary divisions above are trefoiled. Above the groined roof of this stage of the tower is the belfry, which contains a ring of eight bells. The ribs of the groining have sculptured bosses at their intersec tions, and the key hole is adorned with foliage. The north transept is terminated by the great window of the restoration of which, by Prior Cas tell, we have already spoken, when contemplating the exterior. It is of six lights, divided by a * Architectural Illustrations of Durham Cathedral, p. 37- 36 transom, supported by additional mullions, with cinquefoiled arches, of sufficient breadth to allow a walk along it, which leads to the triforium. The transom does not appear externally, which occasions the mullions when viewed from the outside to appear disproportionably long. The tracery of the upper part has all the elegance of the decorated period. When Prior Castell restored it, he added to its beauty by the adornment of stained glass, in which large figures of the four Doctors of the church, St. Augustine, St. Ambrose, St. Gregory and St. Jerome, formed the most conspicuous features, and occasioned him to give it the name of the window of the four Doctors. He intro duced also a figure of himself, in the attitude of supplication, at the feet of the Virgin. Both north and south transepts, as we have observed, have an aisle on their eastern side, from which they are separated by a range of Norman piers of precisely the same character as those we have already described in the nave. The only difference is that the space between each is consi derably narrower, and their arches in consequence assume more of the stilted form. The round columns are all channelled with the spiral ornament, except the one nearest the clock, which is zig zagged. The triforia and clerestories are likewise of the same period and character as those of the nave. From the face of each pier projects a bracket, which has originally supported either a statue or a I amp, most probably the former ; for each aisle of the transept contained three altars, and in all proba bility, the image indicated the locality of the shrine which was erected in honour of the saint whom it figured. In the north transept aisle were the altars of St. Benedict and St. Gregory, and at its northern extremity the altar of St. Nicholas and 37 St. Giles. Before St. Benedict's altar was buried Robert Berrington, the first Prior of Durham, to whom was conceded the use of the mitre, pastoral staff, ring and sandals. This privilege appears to have been anxiously desired, for we find the Prior and Convent making earnest supplication for it to the Pope, and setting forth very gravely among their reasons, that much people wondered that so important a dignitary should lack these badges of power and place. The request was acceded to by a Bull of Pope Urban VI., dated July 21, 1379. The right of the Prior to the privilege in question was recognized in 1382 by the Archbishop of York, who appears to have considered it a high piece of presumption in the Prior that he celebrated mass within his diocese with pontifical insignia, and summoned him accordingly to appear and exhibit the authority, if any, under which he ventured so to invest himself. The production of the Pope's Bull of course settled the matter. Further pon tifical privileges, the power of conferring the minor orders, and consecrating the holy vessels and ecclesiastical ornaments, were granted to the Prior of Durham and his successors in 1456, by a Bull of Pope Calixtus III. Prior Forcer, whose name we have already mentioned in connection with the great west window of the nave, and the original decorated window of the north transept, was buried near St. Nicholas' and St. Giles' altar. He was the first Prior buried within the church. The Consistory Court, which occupied the enclosed space of this aisle, has recently been transferred to the place it originally occupied in the Galilee. Its benches and screen work have been removed, and the aisle thrown open. The windows were adorned of old with the effigies of the saints in whose honour the altars were dedicated of which we 38 have spoken. At the end of the south tran sept is a large perpendicular window, called the Te Deum window, which has been recently re stored. The upper lights are filled with stained glass, some of it re-instated on its restoration ; the rest made up of fragments, which were formerly in one of its lower divisions. This window must once have exhibited a magnificent example of the stained glass of the fifteenth century. The design was carried throughout the whole extent of the window and represented the nine orders of angels, thrones, dominations, cherubim, &C, bearing scrolls, on which were inscribed, in black letter, the verses of the Te Deum. There was much true feeling, whatever might be the execution of the design, in thus symbolizing the agreement be tween the noblest hymn in which man can sing the praises of the Ever Blessed Trinity, and the anthems of the hosts of Heaven. Underneath stood the clock, an incongruous, but not unpleasing combination of panel and pinnacle, partly Italian in their detail, and partly an imita tion of old tabernacle work. On the panels of the door below, leading to the Chapter house, was curiously depicted a view of the inside of the Cathe dral. We remember the colouring under which this was concealed being carefully taken off one side of the door a few years ago, and the old paint ing partially restored to sight, but it was again hidden under a thick coat of its former covering. The date of the clock was 1632. It is mentioned by the travellers we have already quoted,* as " a rare and riche clocke and diall, wth severall globes, whereby to know the age of the moone, the day of the moneth, the moneth of the year, &c." * See p. 26. 39 In the course of the alterations which have recently removed many of the inharmonious fea tures introduced in the seventeenth century, the wood-work of the clock has been taken away. Its works and dial plate have been inserted within the arch of a blank Norman window, under the great Te Deum window, of which we have just spoken. The aisle of the transept in which we now stand, was until lately occupied by the Virgers' vestry, and the small chapel, in which, within the memory of persons yet alive, early morning prayers were solemnized. This aisle has also been thrown open to the transept, with much advantage, it must be confessed, to the general effect of the building : although the separation of these side chapels by wooden parcloses or screens must have prevailed from a remote period, and indeed when the cha racter of these screens is good, the partial conceal ment which they occasion, is by no means un- pleasing either to the eye or the imagination. A fragment of old screen work, painted and gilt, which was in the early morning prayer Chapel, has been removed to the Galilee, and may repay inspection. The space which this chapel com prises, originally contained two altars, that of St. Faith and St. Thomas, and the altar of the Lady of Bolton. The image attached to this altar, as described in Sanderson, must have fairly come under the head of those " superstitious pictures" of which no one who values pure religion can regret the removal. In the space adjoining was the altar of the Lady of Houghall. Both these altars, as their name implies, were in honour of the Virgin, and derived their distinctive appellation from the places which respectively furnished the funds which maintained the priests who served 40 them. The windows of this aisle, with the excep tion of the one at the south-east end, are of the decorated period, and retain a few fragments of stained glass in their tracery. The screen which now separates the choir from the body of the church, is of dark oak, divided into compartments by pilasters of Italian charac ter, assuming the form of caryatides, and adorned with a profusion of carving, representing fruit and flowers, in bold relief, displaying considerable skill in the execution, and possessing much richness of effect. It was erected in Bishop Cosin's time. Whatever merit, however, it may possess, as far as its own peculiar style is concerned, it is totally out of place where it is. Nothing could have been devised bearing less affinity to the character of the building in which it is so conspicuously placed. How different is the effect of the noble screen in York Minster, with its ' niches of nicest work manship,' and how full of regret is the thought that before puritanical violence defiled her beauty, Durham also could boast one of similar character, adorned with the sculptured images of King, and Queen, and saintly Bishop, in grateful commemo ration of the piety and munificence which had contributed to the erection or adornment of her ' rich Cathedral fane.' Their names and the inscriptions which Prior Wessington caused to be inscribed under their effigies, are preserved in Sanderson's Antiquities, from which we have so often quoted- Surmounting this screen the prin cipal organ of the church, for there were three, oc cupied the same station as the one which is now in use. In front of it, facing the east, was " a lettern of wood, like unto a pulpit," from which the " nine lessons" were chaunted on the principal feast- days. The present organ was built in 1684, by the 41 celebrated Father Smith, well known to musicians as the maker of the one in the Temple Church. Full justice is done to the rich and mellow tones by which, in common with all Father Smith's in struments, it is characterised, under the admirable management of the present organist. One great beauty of this organ is, that its size and strength, though amply sufficient, are not so preponderating as to overwhelm the voices of the choir. A prevailing rage for displaying the powers of the instrument has unfortunately caused our modern organ builders to forget, in some cases, that the capability of thundering out a crashing accompani ment is very often subversive of that due subser viency, which, for devotional purposes especially, its tones ought to bear to the size of the building, and above all to the strength of the vocal harmony. Before we quit the subject of the organ, we may not omit to draw attention to the manner in which the choral service of the Church is here solemnized. In few, if any, of the choirs of our Cathedral churches, is the performance of the majestic har monies and solemn services which are the heritage of our Church surpassed, in fewer still is it equal led, in devotional effect or scientific precision. 42 THE CHOIR. " Our ancestors within this still domain Their vigils kept ', where tapers day and night On the dim Altar burned continually In token that the house was evermore Watching to God " Wordsworth. We now enter the Choir, and may well afford to linger awhile, and contemplate the beauty which the opening of its doors unfolds to us, before we proceed to count the stones or criticise the details of that which delights the eye as much by the harmony of its proportions, as it affects the heart by its associations. The great features of the building to which we have hitherto directed our attention have been altogether distinguished by the massive- ness and solidity of their Norman character. In the view which now presents itself to our eye, we perceive these characteristics blending themselves with the aspiring lines of that chaste and simple phase of our christian architecture which we deno minate the early English. Instead of the semi- Norman character of the vaulting of the nave, that which we are now contemplating has the graceful sweep of the mouldings of its ribs and arches orna mented with the deeply cut hollows and bold pro jections which produce such striking effects of light and shade, enriched moreover with the tooth ornament, which is so peculiar a characteristic of this style. Bosses, richly sculptured with figures and foliage, adorn the intersections of the groin ing, and a lofty pointed arch, springing from clus tered columns, divides the choir from the Chapel of the Nine Altars. Beneath this arch is the Altar Screen, an elaborate and eminently graceful 43 specimen of later, or decorated English. Niche, and canopy, and crocketed pinnacle, rise above each other with airy lightness and elegance, producing an effect which is almost magical. It forms the termination of the Choir, but a division of fairy net- work could scarcely less obstruct the view of that which lies beyond, for the eye goes on to em brace within its sphere of vision, the branching roof of the eastern transept, and the lofty lancets and glorious marigold window of its central com partment, through which are poured such floods of orient light. Highly as we may deem of the stern grandeur of their style, there is no room for regret that the apsidal ending of the choir by the Norman architects, has been superseded by the 'glorious work of high intelligence' which now terminates our view. The piers and arches, on each side of the choir, as far as its eastern compartment, exhibit essen tially the same features as those of the nave. The round columnar piers have the spiral ornament, and all the arches have round or roll mouldings on their faces and soffits. Above each of these arches are two smaller ones, constructed beneath a larger, and opening from the Triforium. They are semi -circular, and are Norman in their detail, as are also the shafts and capitals from which they spring. Three semi-cylindrical shafts attached to the wall, on each side, between each of the large arches of the triforium, their bases resting on its string-course, and their capitals under one abacus, contribute their support to the ribs of the vault ing. Similarly employed single shafts of the same height and character are placed in each angle of the triforium compartments. The capitals and abaci of those towards the east have been subse quently decorated with sculpture of an early 44 English character, at the period, doubtless, when the choir received its vaulting. The clere-story does not possess the arcade of triple arches which distinguishes that of the nave and transept, hav ing merely plain semi-circular-headed openings. In the angles of each compartment of the clere story are slender cylindrical shafts, with early English foliaged capitals, resting on corbels of the same design, a little lower than the string course, and supporting face arches, which accommodate themselves in their sweep to the embayments of the roof. The vaulting of the roof, as we have already indicated, is of the early English period. It was the work of Prior Hoton, about the year 1289. It is quadripartite, supported by diagonal and trans verse ribs. They are ornamented with the mould ings peculiar to this style, the deep hollows of which are filled up with the pyramidical four leaved flower which is such a constantly recurring decoration in the architecture of this period. Bosses of various design adorn the intersections. The one nearest the entrance represents a figure with a basket of fruit, and one about the middle of the choir, is elaborately sculptured with rich foliage. With the eastern pier of the arch beyond the Bishop's throne, the Norman character of the building ceases, and all beyond, both arch and column, in this compartment of the choir, is early English in its composition and details. The clustered columns supporting the arch which divides the Choir from the Nine Altars are car ried to about half the height of the Triforium. The capitals are bell shaped, with gracefully curl ing foliage beneath their upper mouldings. The side arches of this compartment of the choir are 45 pointed, with deeply cut mouldings, the soffits ornamented with the dog-tooth ornament. They spring from clustered columns with capitals carved with intertwining figures and foliage. The hood mouldings are ornamented with various figures of birds and animals and finish with corbel heads. The arch on each side of the triforium is wide and nearly semi-circular, with a hood moulding similarly decorated and finishing in the same man ner, within which are comprised three pointed arches, richly adorned with the dog-tooth orna ment, springing from low slender pillars with sculptured capitals. The space above them, under the larger arch, is ornamented with two foliated circles sunk into the wall below each of which is a round boss or corbel, richly foliaged. The string course of this division of the triforium and of the clere-story also, is adorned with sculptured figures of various device. The arches and pillars of this part of the clere-story partake of the same charac ter as those of the triforium. The space which in the original design was occupied by the great tri ple columns of the clustered piers westernmost of the altar, is filled by a double arcade, if we may use the expression. The lower one is in five di visions with trefoil headed arches. The upper one has three members, with arches of the same shape, but of more elaborate ornament. They spring from long slender face-shafts, with foliaged capitals, supported by variously sculptured cor bels. These shafts are banded midway between the bases and the capitals, and the arches they support are surmounted by strait-sided triangular canopies, whose sides are adorned with richly sculptured foliage. Above this arcade the trans verse rib of the groining springs from short clus tered vaulting shafts supported by grotesque 46 corbels. That on the north side, representing animals in the act of devouring each other, has escaped mutilation, and is carved with great spirit and freedom. Higher up, in the easternmost angles of the clere-story are trefoil-headed niches containing statues resting upon foliaged corbels They are interesting, not only as being beautiful in themselves, but as the only figures adorning the interior which have escaped the rage of puritan iconoclasts. Of the demolition that took place under their hands we may form some idea from the fact that one hundred and seven statues, some of them of the size of life, once adorned the niches of the Altar-screen. This magnificent work is of the decorated period. It was erected in 1380, and more than two-thirds of the cost was defrayed by the Lord Neville of Raby, whose shield appears in the spandrils of the doorways. It is made of Caen stone, and if the statues which once stood under its canopies at all equalled in beauty and grace the architectural orna ments which survive, we may well lament their removal. In elegance of outline and richness of detail it has few rivals. Its " fair images of ala baster," were, as we learn from Sanderson, painted and gilt, and its niches and pinnacled canopies were doubtless enriched in like manner, thus form ing an harmonious combination with the rich hues of the ' storied windows' and the costly hangings of " red velvet, with great flowers of gold, in em broidered work," which adorned the Altar. " The screen consists of ten detached piers, ornamented on the west side with angular buttresses, and square ones on the east. Between these, on each side, are four small niches, above which the piers terminate with lofty pinnacles. The basement (otherwise solid) has two doorways to St. Cuth- 47 bert's shrine, in the second space from each end. Above is a series of open niches, five principal (octagonal) and four smaller (hexagonal). On the west side, the front pillar of the niches was left out for displaying the statues. The central niche, wider than the others, had a statue of the Virgin, and in those on each side were statues called ' the picture of St. Cuthbert and the picture of St. Oswald, all richly gilt' Above these niches is a second series, the five principal being open as be fore for statues, but the minor ones have all the piers, being merely ornamented canopies, termi nated with pinnacles. Surmounting the second series of open niches is another range with the piers complete, and lofty pinnacles terminating the elevation."* The interiors of the canopies of the niches are beautifully groined with numerous small rib mouldings, and bosses at their intersec tions, and all the subordinate details of crocket and finial are worked out with elaborate richness and singular beauty. Amid such a profusion of ornaments it would be endless to attempt a minute description. An indication of their existence will be a sufficient guide to the intelligent beholder. Let us not forget, however, to draw attention to the beauty of the door-ways which lead to the shrine. There are four Sedilia, on each side of the altar, of the same period and character as the screen. They were for the officiating priests to sit in dur ing the chanting of the Gloria and Credo by the choir. It is not common to find them on both sides. The usual number was three, on the epistle side of the altar, although we sometimes meet with four seats in large churches. " The four arches on the epistle side of the sanctuary of * Architectural Illustrations of Durham Cathedral, p. 43. 48 Westminster Abbey, commonly called King Sebert's tomb, are in fact the sedilia of that church."* The High Altar, to which this screen or Reredos formed so magnificent a background was garnished as we may well believe, with extreme splendour. Lamps of silver burned continually before it, whose glimmering rays waxed stronger as the shades of evening began to deepen. Rich hangings were suspended on each side, varying in colour and in the magnificence of their embroidery with the several feast-days of the Church. A pix of pure gold, for the reservation of the holy sacrament, hung over the Altar, under a canopy of the same pre cious material, surmounted by a " pelican all of sil ver, very finely gilt, giving her blood to her young ones, in token that Christ gave His blood for the sins of the world."f Chalices of gold, adorned with jewels, and censers and candlesticks of silver gilt were among its splendid furniture. A book of the Epistles and Gospels, which laid upon the altar, " did serve for the Pax in the Mass." It is described as being " a marvellous fair book, having on the outside of the covering the picture of our Saviour Christ, all of silver, of goldsmith's work, all parcel gilt, very fine to behold." Such was the antient splendour of the High Altar of Durham Cathedral; and even after the Reformation its adornments appear to have been of no mean character. The travellers of whom we have spoken as visiting Durham in 1634, de scribe the Altar as being " of blacke branch 'd mar ble, supported wth 6 fayre columnes of touchstone, all built at the charge of Dr. Hunt, the Reverend Deane : and to adorn it 2 double gilt candlestickes, and a bason, 2 double gilt fayre flaggons, 2 chalices * Dublin Review, No. xx., p. 333. t Davies's Rites and Monuments. 49 wth covers likewise double gilt, all wch riche plate were given to this Church by some religious churchman's bounty." They mention also " a High Altar cloth of crimson velvet to covr the table ; another of purple velvet to hang above ; and a third of crimson and purple, to lay beneath." Sir William Brereton, also, in his " Notes of a Journey," in 1635, mentions the "stately altar- stone, all of fine marble, standing upon a frame of marble pillars of the same marble of the font. When the communion is here administered by the bishop himself, here is laid upon this altar, or rather communion table, a stately cloth of cloth of gold; the bishop useth the new red embroidered cope which is wrought full of stars, like one I have seen worn in St. Dennis in Fraunce ; there are here other two rich copes, all which are shaped like unto long cloaks reaching down to the ground, and which have round capes." The existing Altar is made of marble, with six " pillars of the same," but as it is not of " blacke branched mar ble" it can scarcely be the one described by the Norwich travellers. In all probability it was erected by Bishop Cosin after the restoration. The communion plate and candlesticks, and the carved oaken faldstools which are within the altar- rails were the gift of Bishop Cosin. The spirit, indeed of, " a religious churchman's bounty," was never more truly shewn than in the person of this prelate. It was in no penurious temper of mind that he set about to repair the desolation and havoc which the hand of Puritanism had wrought, as the church of Branspeth and the castles of Durham and Aukland remain to testify. His gift of books and plate to the chapels of those two castles are stated in his will to have cost more than £1000. 50 " Give all thou canst ; high Heaven rejects the lore Of nicely-calculated less or more." Next to the Altar screen, the most prominent object of attention, is the Bishop's throne, on the south side of the Choir. It was built by Bishop Hatfield for the double purpose of an episcopal seat and a canopy over the tomb which he prepared to receive his remains. The altar tomb and its beau tiful recumbent effigy are unseen from the choir, being concealed by a wooden partition at the back of the canons' ladies pew, which itself obstructs the view of the lower part of the throne. It is a beauti ful specimen of decorated work. The lower por tion, or canopy of the tomb, projects into the choir, and an ascent of steps, at its eastern extremity, gives access to the Bishop's seat at the top, over which is a large and richly ornamented canopy, forming the centre of the screen-work which fills up the space between the great Norman piers and their semi-circular arch overhead. The arch of the canopy of the tomb is segmental, the tracery cusps of which were formerly terminated with angels, as may be seen on the south side. In the hollow mouldings of the arch is inserted at intervals, the flat four leaved flower which is a common ornament of the decorated style, and which predominates as an enrichment of the other parts of the work we are contemplating. The interior of the canopy is richly groined with numerous intersecting ribs and elaborately sculp tured bosses. The front is adorned with trefoil- headed ogee arched panels with crockets and finials, between which are small buttresses, sculp tured with alternate shields and flowers, with triangular crocketed heads, terminating in pinna cles. Within the arches of this panelling, which is richly diapered, were brackets for the support 51 of statues. Some of the brackets are remaining. The lower division of the screen work above, on each side of the canopy of the Bishop's seat, is square headed with decorated tracery. Above this are open canopied niches, with crocketed pinnacles and finials carried up to the height of the Norman arch. The central niche, over the Bishop's seat, as well as the others were originally occupied by curiously sculptured figures. Bishop Hatfield's coat of arms, azure a chevron or between three lions rampant argent, is scattered, with great profusion, among the decorations of the throne. The rich painting and gilding with which not only these shields, but all the tomb, with its canopy and screen-work, once glowed, has been partially brought to light, by the careful abrasion of the many coats of whitewash under which they were hidden. A further improvement might ob viously be effected by taking away the carved oak doorway, and balustrade, with its long red damask frontal, and replacing the stone parapet which doubtless stood in front of the throne, when in its original state. Many excellent examples of open stone parapets, pierced in trefoils or quatrefoils, might be found. The arms on the doorway are those of Lord Crewe. The throne is ascended by fourteen steps. There is perhaps no church in Christendom where a Bishop has ever obtained so great an external elevation above his presbyters. An English priest, of the Romish communion, remarks, " the seat of the Bishop in the antient and patriarchal churches of Rome is raised very little above the clergy. The episcopal chair continued however to rise till it acquired the name, the elevation, and more than the usual splendour of a throne. It appears to have reached its acme, not in Rome, as the reader 52 may naturally imagine, but in the Cathedral of Durham, where the lord Bishop sits enthroned in far more than papal eminence, and looks down upon the choir, the congregation, and the pulpit."* To the tomb of Bishop Hatfield, properly so called, with its recumbent figure, we shall hereafter return. Nothing remains of the original tabernacle or stall-work of the choir, which was all destroyed during the Great Rebellion, neither have we any very definite idea of the period to which we may refer its erection. An item, indeed, occurs in Prior Wessington's account roll (which extends over a period from 1416 to 1446,) whereby it ap pears that he expended £20. in the making of desks in the choir, before the low stalls. In his day this was no inconsiderable sum, and from the examples which occur in many churches of the stall work executed at that period, we may easily imagine the rich effect of perpendicular panel- work and elaborately carved poppy heads, with which his munificence and taste would adorn the desks at which the brethren knelt in prayer. The whole of the present stall-work was put up after the Restoration, and in all probability is an imita tion of that which preceded it, for it has more features in common with old tabernacle-work than might have been expected, considering the time of its execution. A great and striking improve ment has recently been effected by the removal of the high square pews which stood beyond the stalls, on the north side of the choir, and the substitution of low open seats, with poppy heads of good design and execution. It is to be hoped that ere long the same hand of taste will apply itself on the southern side, unmask the base of * Eustace's Classical Tour 53 Bishop Hatfield's tomb, and replace the square projection before the altar rails, by seats of a more ecclesiastical and less obtrusive character. A wooden pulpit, which, though handsome of its kind, was not exactly such as one would wish to see in such a building, has recently been removed. It was hexagonal, and its sides were inlaid with figures of the four Evangelists, and St. Peter and St. Paul, nearly the size of life, and some other devices. Its place is occupied by a stone pulpit, designed by Mr. Salvin, in praise of which it may be sufficient to say that it is not unworthy to stand by the side of Hatfield's tomb, to whose period its character and decorations may be referred. Nothing can be more beautiful than the sculptured heads which form part of its ornamental detail. An idea prevails, not uncommonly, that in mak ing additions to, or restorations in a Norman building, every thing ought to be made to assume a like character, which, in our opinion, is by no means requisite, or, indeed, always conducive to the best general effect. We would ask the most pertinacious adherents of Norman uniformity to look at the altar screen, Bishop Hatfield's tomb, and this pulpit, and see how harmoniously the accessaries of a church, displaying the light and graceful features of a later style, may be made to contrast with the severer character of a Nor man building. 54 THE NINE ALTARS. There is every reason for supposing that an apse terminated the eastern extremity of the church, as finished by the Norman architects. Mr. Raine supposes the choir and aisles each to have had apsidal or semi-circular terminations,* but there appears much plausibility in the reasons which Mr. Billings alleges for his suggestion, that the aisles were carried round the apsidal ending of the choirt. According to the idea he entertains, the end of the church was a semi-circle, extending exactly to the wall of the nine altars, and its centre was the place then, and now, occupied by the body of St. Cuthbert. An attempt was made by Bishop Pudsay to erect a lady-chapel at the east end of the church, adjoining the feretory of St. Cuthbert, which was frustrated (if credence may be given to legendary lore), by the manifest indications given by the saint of his aversion to the proximity of female worshippers. Walls shrank and columns tottered, the project was abandoned, and the materials applied to the building of the beautiful lady-chapel which still remains at the west end of the church, more commonly known by the name of the Galilee. A more obvious reason might have been found, in some failure of the foundations or sinking of the ground near that part of the fabric, which appears subsequently to have affected also the vaulting of the apse, for we learn by an indulgence of the Bishop of Ely in 1235, that " above the sacred sepulchre of St. Cuthbert, the vaulted roof of stone was so full of * St. Cuthbert, p. 94. t Architectural Illustrations, p. 35 and plate 5. 55 fissures and cracks, that its fall seemed to be approaching." This would appear, therefore, to have been the proximate cause of the erection of the eastern transept, or chapel of the Nine Altars. The indulgence goes on to promise remission of thirty days of enjoined penance, to all who shall contribute the pious bounty of their alms to the proposed fabric, or who shall visit the place, for the purpose of prayer, during the seven years next ensuing. A long list of indulgences, of similar purport, from other prelates is given in a manifesto of Prior Melsonby, the great promoter of the work, which appears to have been issued with a view of exciting the people to a pious liberality. The opening terms of his manifesto present a pleasing contrast to those in which the indulgences are commonly framed. The glories of the blessed Cuthbert, by whose merits the sick obtain the bless ing of health, the boast of his incorruptibility, and the benefits of the suffrages of the saints, are sub jects of constant recurrence in the preambles of the indulgences. " The preliminary clauses of Prior Melsonby's manifesto, on the contrary," as Mr. Raine well observes, " appear to be drawn up in the true spirit of christian solicitation, for a pious purpose."* The name by which the eastern transept, since the time of its erection, has always been known, takes its rise, (as indeed is sufficiently obvious), from the number of altars which it originally con tained. It is a most interesting specimen of early English, not more to be admired for the majestic effect of its clustering columns and vaulted roof, than for the exquisite perfection of some of its minor details. Yet, eminently beautiful as these things are, it owes not its chief interest to them. * St. Cuthbert, p. 100. 56 Within its precints still rest the remains of the holy man over whose tomb once rose an o'er- canopying shrine, more gorgeous perhaps, assu redly not less so, than that of any saint whose memory was ever cherished in these lands ; at which gold and jewels were lavished with unsparing hand, and before which pilgrims came to worship in countless multitudes. The shrine, indeed, of St. Cuthbert, is no longer " exalted with most curious workmanship, of fine and costly green marble, all limned and gilt with gold," but a more enduring monument remains in this stately pile, which it is impossible to deny owes its chief grandeur to the reverence in which the name of Cuthbert was held ; for, the more safe and hon ourable keeping of the body of that sainted con fessor is given as a reason, in the Bishop of Ely's indulgence, for the erection of the " new building at the eastern end of the church," to which we are now directing the attention of our readers. St. Cuthbert, most assuredly was no common man. We may smile, indeed, or sigh, when we read the absurd and puerile, nay, sometimes blas phemous legends, which for ages were handed down, and piously believed concerning him ; yet, stripping him of the false halo with which a too fond veneration invested him, enough of sober truth remains to assure us, that he was a bright and shining light in a dark and barbarous age, and, without attaching, or wishing to attach, more credit than is justly due to the particulars of his life that have come down to us, we may well believe that venerable must have been the sanctity of that man whose very name exercised so power ful an influence for centuries after his death, and which popular tradition has, even yet, not ceased to remember. Indeed, it is perhaps next to im- 57 possible for us, in the present day, so to divest ourselves of the influence of the associations of civilised life, utterly foreign to those which actua ted our remote ancestors, as to be able to estimate rightly the effect of the example and manner of life of a true servant of God, in his humility, his temperance, and devotedness to his holy calling, upon a rude and fierce people, in whose ears the clash of swords was as a sound of sweet music, and who rushed to the battle field as to a scene of joyous pastime. Wisely and thoughtfully has he written who said, " Such Priest, when service worthy of his care Has called him forth to breathe the common air, Might seem a saintly Image from its shrine Descended : — happy are the eyes that meet The apparition ; evil thoughts are stayed At his approach, and low bowed necks intreat A benediction from his voice or hand ; Whence grace, through which the heart can understand And vows, that bind the will, in silence made." Wordsworth. But to return. The chapel of the nine altars is in seven divisions, formed by lofty clustered piers of stone, with slender detached shafts of Frosterley marble, all united together under one capital. The piers are banded, on a level with the string course at the base of the lower stage of windows, and again midway between that and the capitals. The central division is of the same width as the choir, and has three lancet windows to the east, with slender attached clustered and banded shafts, in front of the window jambs, and supporting their arches, the architraves of which are enriched with the tooth moulding, and terminate in corbel heads. Single lancet windows of simi lar character and decoration occupy the lower stage of all the other compartments on the eastern side. Corresponding windows, of a smaller size, 58 occupy the upper stage of the divisions, excepting the central one, which is entirely filled by the magnificent marigold or Catherine window, which we have more than once mentioned as giving such a character to the eastern termination of the building. Its tracery was restored with tolerable regard to the period to which it belonged, about the year 1795. It consists of an outer circle of twenty-four lights, and an inner one of twelve, radiating from a foliated circle as their common centre. The painted glass with which it was originally filled by the liberality of Richard Pic kering, Rector of Hemingburgh, between the year 1409 and 1413, has perished, and has been repla ced by the fragments of that which once adorned the other windows of this chapel. Previously to the alterations in 1795 these windows were filled with tracery of the perpendicular period, the work of Prior Wessington, and were adorned with painted glass, representing the legendary history of the saints whose altars stood beneath them. Wessington's tracery was not restored, and the whole range of the eastern windows of the nine altars now appear in their original early English character. The perpendicular tracery of the win dows at the south end, was sedulously re- copied when that part of the building was restored in 1827. The great window of the north end was called Joseph's window, from the history of that patriarch being therein depicted. It is of early decorated work, and is singularly interesting for the beauty and simplicity of its geometrical tra cery. We may remark further (to use Mr. Billings' words), that " it is perfectly unique in the repe tition internally of the great ribs of the tracery supported on clustered columns, the latter being connected with the mullions by through stones at 59 five different places, which add materially to the strength of the Whole. There is an iron bar, which appears to be original, acting as a tie, run ning through this internal tracery, and resting upon the capitals." An arcade runs round the whole of the lower part of the interior, consisting of a series of tre foil-headed arches, supported by slender detached single shafts of Frosterley marble. The hood mouldings of the arches terminate in corbel-heads, of various device, kings and bishops and cowled monks ; most of them, unfortunately, sorely mu tilated. The space above, between the arches and the string course, at the base of the lower windows, is occupied by a range of quatrefoils, sunk into the wall, with bold projecting mould ings. The altars have evidently been an integral part of the original design, as may be seen by the most cursory observation of the manner in which the arcade is made to adapt itself to the places which they occupied. Where the capitals of the shafts of the arcade have escaped mutilation, no thing can be more graceful or elegant than their varied foliage, the stems rising from the neck moulding, and curling over beneath the abacus, the hollow moulding of which, in some, is deco rated with the tooth-ornament. The capitals of the clustered piers have, for the most part, escaped mutilation, and are elaborately designed and ex- quisitly finished. The capital of one of the piers in the south aisle, at the entrance into the nine altars, may be particularly pointed out. Beneath its foliage is a row of winged animals intertwining and devouring each other. Numberless examples of this kind of decoration occur in the illuminated manuscripts of this date. The hood mouldings of the arches, generally, are adorned with the 60 tooth- ornament, and terminate in corbel-heads. Some of those which remain uninjured, are beau tiful specimens of sculpture. There is a purity of expression and repose about some of the'se old heads, which we sometimes look for in vain in the works of artists of a period much more distinguish ed, in common acceptation, for the cultivation of the art. Let us point, for example, to the mitred head at the termination, nearest the shrine, of the hood moulding of the last arch of the north aisle, leading into the nine altars. The groining is of the same character as that of the choir, which, indeed, is co-eval with it. It has some peculiarities in the disposition of its parts, which are obviously contrivances to get rid of the effect of the inequality of some of the com partments. The keyhole of the central compart ment of the vaulting is sculptured with the figures of the Evangelists ; that towards the south is also encircled with figures, and the corresponding one on the north is adorned with rich foliage. The doorways at the north and south ends of the chapel appear to have formed part of the original design. The southern doorway is still in use, but the other has been long closed. It is said to have been made for the sole purpose of avoiding the passage of Bishop Bee's body through the church, when brought here for sepulture. He was the first person buried within the walls of the cathedral, and reverence for St. Cuthbert is as signed as the reason for this procedure, but the mouldings of its arch, which connect themselves with those of the arcade, and its similarity to the one opposite, afford no evidence of the truth of this tradition. There is another closed doorway, with a flat ogee arch, in that part of the south aisle of the choir which comes within the precincts 61 of this Chapel. It has probably been a private entrance from the Cemetery. In directing atten tion to the staircases at the north and south ends of the Nine Altars, we may remark upon the groin ing of their entrances as affording an example of the care which the Architects of the olden time bestowed upon the construction and ornament even of those parts of the building which were most un likely to meet the view. The arrangement of the Nine Altars, from which this part of the fabric takes its distinctive name, was as follows. The altar of St. Cuthbert and Venerable Beda occupied the middle of the centre compartment, under the great marigold window, which contained also the Altar of St. Oswald and St. Laurence on the south and that of St. Martin on the north. On a line with these, towards the south, the three other compartments or divisions were respectively occupied by a single Altar ; the one next the great central compartment being de dicated to St. Thomas of Canterbury and St. Ca therine, adjoining this, on the south, St. John Baptist and St. Margaret's Altar, and at the extre mity of the line the Altar of St. Andrew and St. Mary Magdalene. The three corresponding compart ments towards the north were similarly filled: the middle one being occupied by the Altar of St. Aidan and St. Helena, that on the south by the Altar of St. Peter and St. Paul, and the northern division by the Altar of St. Michael the Archangel. The almeries in the wall, belonging to some of these Altars, are still remaining. From the accoun given in the Rites of Durham, their adornments do not appear to have been inferior to those in the other parts of the Church. "All the foresaid Nine Altars had their several shrines, and covers of wainscot overhead, in a very decent and comely G 62 form ; having likewise betwixt every Altar a very fair and large partition of wainscot, all varnished over with fine branches and flowers, and other imagery-work, most finely and artificially pictur'd and gilt."* Eastward of the Altar-screen, and of like width, a quadrangular space projects into the Nine Altars, at the height of about three yards from the level of the latter. An open screen of oak, which though of debased style, was not devoid of beauty, enclosed it on three sides, but has recently been removed. There are two doorways in the Altar- screen which give access to it from the Choir. It is also entered by a doorway at each end, from the Nine Altars. In the midst of this space the Shrine or Feretory of St. Cuthbert was exalted, and within its precincts his body now reposes, the place of his rest beingunmarked and undistinguished, save by a nameless slab of plain blue marble, without a single vestige of the splendour with which his tomb was once encompassed. Some effort, in deed, of the imagination is needed to realize the fact that we are standing on a spot where so much riches and magnificence were once concentrated in his honour. Two deep furrows, worn in the hum ble pavement by the feet of successive visitors, alone silently indicate that some reverence for the name of Cuthbert has survived the destruction of his stately shrine. The terms Feretory and Shrine were often used indiscriminately, but, generally speaking, the for mer appears to have been applied to the whole of the quadrangular space of which we have been speaking; the Shrine implying more particularly the sumptuous repository, standing in its centre, within which the body of the Saint was laid. * Davies's Rites and Monuments, p. 4. 63 From the account which is given in the Rites and Monuments, we may suppose this to have been something like a sarcophagus of green mar ble, richly adorned with gilding, which supported a coffin, strongly bound with iron, containing his sacred remains. Over this was a moveable canopy of wood, provided with a lock at each corner for the security of the relics which it covered. It was beautified with carving, and bright and lustrous with gold and colours. On St. Cuthbert's day and some other festivals, or when an offering was made at the shrine, this cover was drawn up by ropes and pullies attached to it for that purpose, and the sweet chiming of the silver bells which hung round it, gave notice by their me lody to the worshippers in the Choir that some pilgrim was prostrate before it, or that some costly jewel or holy relic had been presented by his hands. Adjoining the shrine, towards the west, was a small Altar, at which mass was annually sung on the feast day of St. Cuthbert. At each end of the Feretory, on the north and south, were almeries, or closets of wood-work, fitted up with shelves for the reception of the relics and offerings of various kinds, which were first laid upon the shrine and afterwards placed in these repositories by the hands of the Feretrar or Shrine-keeper, to whose custody they were intrusted. He had also the care of a small chest affixed near the Altar, in which the faithful deposited their money-offerings to the Saint. In the list of the relics preserved in St. Cuth bert's Feretory, we find some which must, even in the middle of the " ages of faith," have required a considerable share of credulity in those who be lieved in their genuineness : e : g — the veil and hair of St. Mary Magdalene, part of the rod of Moses, 64 the relics of St. Peter the Apostle, (to which Ca tholic tradition has always assigned Rome as a resting place) a piece of the tree under which the three angels sat with Abraham, the milk of St. Mary the Virgin, and many bones of the Holy Innocents in vials of crystal and red bags of finest linen. Others there were rather more likely per haps to be genuine, being the teeth and bones of Saints and Martyrs whose names must have been familiar as household words in the ears of a north countryman, and whose places of interment were well known, such as St. Bartholomew the Hermit of Fame, St. Oswald the king, St. Ceolwulf the King, St. Columkill, St. Acca of Hexham, St. Godric, St. William of York, and St. John of Bridlington. Honourable mention is also made of others, less known to fame, as St. Gengulphus (whose tooth was good for the falling sickness) St. Marius and St. Audephax. Amongst these apo cryphal and, more or less, questionable relics, however, we find some gifts recorded, which as curious works of art we may regret have perished. Their intrinsic value made them, of course, a wel come prey to the cupidity of Henry VIII's Com missioners. We may mention a few. An image of the Blessed Virgin, of silver gilt. A cross of gold, set with precious stones, with a pedestal of silver gilt. A cup of silver gilt, the gift of the Countess of Kent. The ivory sceptre of King Oswald. An Agnus Dei in silver. An ivory casket, ornamented with gold and silver, contain ing the gloves of St. Cuthbert, the gift of Richard de Birtley, Monk of Durham. Indeed not a shelf in the almeries appears to have been without its ¦ relic Shrine of cost With ivory and gems emboss'd,' 65 and caskets and tabernacles of silver gilt, each con taining some precious relic. Curious and interesting as these thingswouldnow be, we may still more deplore the loss of the books which were reposited under Master Feretrar's care. We read of a copy of the Evangelists, ornamented with gold, with a gilt crucifix and many evidences and monuments ; of another copy, together with the life of St. Cuthbert, ornamented on one of its backs with a representation of the crucifixion sil ver gilt, and on the other with images of ivory. Several others are also mentioned, on the binding and decoration of which the like care and cost appear to have been bestowed, which indeed ap pears quite sufficient to account for their destruc tion, for it is a matter of history that, " when the covers were somewhat rich, and would yield a lit tle, they pulled them off, threw away the books, or turned them to waste paper."* At the east end of the Feretory the banner of St. Cuthbert occupied a prominent position. It appears to have been a square of white velvet, bearing (in heraldic language) a cross gules, with a broad border of crimson of the same rich material, sumptuously embroidered with green silk and gold, and enclosed within its folds, " that holy relic, the corporax cloth, wherewith that holy man St. Cuth bert covered the chalice when he said mass." The presence of a banner thus sanctified was sup posed to ensure victory to the host whom it accompanied to the battle field, and accordingly we find that the standard of St. Cuthbert was dis played before the conquering warriors of Neville's Cross and Flodden Field, to the discomfiture of their Scottish foes, whose captured pennons were carried with great solemnity to the Church of" * Collier, vol. II., page 166. 66 Durham, and hung for many a year, in dusky and drooping folds, over the tomb of the Saint under whose auspices they had been taken. The proud banner of the Lord Neville, with its " Silver saltire upon martiall red,"* also fitly waved over the Shrine to whose adorn ments its owner had been so munificent a contri butor. So stood the Shrine until the arrival of Henry VIII's Commissioners in 1540, when chalice and jewelled pyx and crucifix and image of gold and silver, were swept into the Royal treasury, its or naments defaced and dismantled, the coffin of the Saint broken open, and his remains eventually buried under the place of their former exaltation. This fact, though sometime doubted, is now beyond dispute. Among the many legends concerning St. Cuthbert which charmed our "boyhood's marvell ing hour," the one which threw an impenetrable veil over the true place of his sepulture was an especial favourite. The readers of Marmion will readily recall the one to which we allude. " There, deep in Durham's Gothic shade, His relics are in secret laid ; But none may know the place, Save of his holiest servants three, Deep sworn to solemn secrecy. Who share that wondrous grace." The charm of mystery, however, has been dispelled; for, not to mention that there are accounts in existence, in the possession of the Dean and Chap ter, specifying each item of the expense of making his grave in the place where his Shrine once stood, all doubt was removed by the disinterment of his remains, on the 17th May, 1827. Under the blue marble stone, which we have mentioned as occupying the centre of the Feretory, were * Barons' Wars. 67 found three chests or coffins, one within another. The outermost was undoubtedly one which was made in 1542, subsequent to the demolition of the Shrine, and after it was determined to inter him beneath its site. Within another containing many fragments of human bones, which in all probability were relics which had been preserved in the Shrine, appeared a third coffin, in great decay, and of most remote antiquity. The appearances presented by the broken pieces of its lid and sides coincided very remarkably with the account given by an anony mous writer, whose, relation has been printed in the Acta Sanctorum, of the examination which took place at the translation of St. Cuthbert in 1104, and also with the description of the coffin by Re ginald, a monk of Durham, who wrote about the year 1165, and who derived his information from his seniors in the Church. Both accounts go to prove that this was the same coffin in which the Saint had been deposited by the monks of Lindis- farne in the year 698, and the careful observation which was made on its discovery in 1827 corro borated the truth of their testimony. Both writers tell us that the lid of the coffin was rais- able by means of two iron rings, one at the head and the other at the feet. One of these rings was found, of a shape differing from any of those which were attached to the outer coffin, and " the iron loop by which one of them was held is still remaining in a portion of the lid."* Reginald again minutely describes the make and material of the coffin and its ornaments, which he says consisted of very admirable engravings of flowers and images, furrowed out in the wood. An inspection of the fragments of the coffin, now in the library of the Dean and Chapter, will abun- • Rainb's St. Cuthbert, p. 188. 68 dantly prove the accuracy of Reginald's account. Among the figures, more or less perfect, thus pre served, are those of St. John, St. Peter, St. Mat thew, St. Paul, the Virgin and Child, the head and neck of an eagle in a nimbus, with several others. If further proof were wanting of its ge nuineness, it is afforded by the inscriptions carved on its different parts, being the names of the seve ral figures, the shape of the letters coinciding most completely with that of the capitals in the copy of the Gospels written for St. Cuthbert by Eadfrid, afterwards eighth Bishop of Lindisfarne, which was the companion of the monks in their travels when compelled by the Danes to leave the island, and which was miraculously recovered after having been lost in the sea. This precious MS. is now in the British Museum. The capital letters of a coeval MS. in the possession of the Dean and Chapter of Durham, containing the gospels of SS. John, Luke, and Mark, are of precisely similar character. Within the decaying and broken fragments of this coffin were found the bones of the Saint, en veloped in the perishing remains of what had once been episcopal robes of no ordinary richness and beauty. A winding sheet of fine linen ap peared to have been the outermost covering, agreeing with the account of Reginald, and his description of the dalmatic and its decorations of " interwoven figures, as well of birds as of small animals," also coincides with the actual appearance of the tattered pieces of silk and embroidery which the earth-damps of centuries had failed entirely to destroy. Eider ducks, (the favourites of St. Cuth- hert) porpoises, rabbits, (which abound on Lindis farne) were among the ornaments of the fragments preserved. A piece of amber- coloured silk was adorned with an equestrian figure, and others, of 69 purple crimson, were diapered with crosses and other decorations. The account of the more in teresting of the relics which were discovered, can scarcely be given better than in the words of Mr. Raine.* " 1. A coarse comb of ivory which cor responds most minutely with the description of the ivory comb found and left in the coffin in 1104. This comb had been fabricated by Elfred the sacrist, about the year 1022, for the purpose of assisting in cutting the hair of the Saint, which was reported to require that operation periodically ; and as often as it was performed, a portion of the hair which was removed was exhibited to the spec tators glittering like gold, and miraculously tri umphing over the fire to which it was applied. Will it be believed that this pretended hair was in very reality gold wire itself ; a quantity of which was found in connection with the scull of the ske leton during the investigation of which we are writing? 2. A small tablet of wood covered with silver, probably the silver Altar spoken of as con tained in the coffin in 1 104. The thin covering of silver was so much broken during its removal, that a few letters only of an inscription upon its surface could be preserved. The tablet of wood, upon which the plating of silver had been laid, had ap parently been previously used in its unornamented state for the same purpose of an Altar, as it also contained an inscription in the characters of the seventh century, proving that it had been fabricated in honour of St. Peter. 3. A small sacramental burse of the size of an octavo book, made of fine linen, and reduced by time to a dusky brown co lour, as if it had been tanned. 4. A rich stole, woven with flattened threads of pure gold, and ornamented with inlet figures in tapestry work of » Brief Account of Durham Cathedral, &c p. 60- 70 prophets, and apostles, and evangelists, with the name of each in legible letters of silk, and an inscription in similar characters, proving that it had been made by command of iElfised, for the pious Bishop Frithestan. 5. A maniple of the same materials, similarly ornamented, and contain ing a similar historical inscription. These splendid specimens of antient art and munificence could not be removed from the skeleton in an entire state, but the greater part of both was saved ; and thus a most valuable addition has been made to our knowledge of the Saxon art of weaving and embroidery. Frithestan, for whose use these robes were made, was consecrated Bishop of Winchester in 909 or 910, nearly a century before Durham was pitched upon as the final resting place of Cuth bert ; and at that period there were three iElflseds, one the daughter of King Alfred, and the wife of Ethelbert, Earl of Mercia, a princess of great wis dom and resolution, and intimately connected with the civil and military history of her times. Ano ther, Alfred's daughter-in-law, the wife of Edward the elder, his son and successor ; and the third, his grand-daughter, a nun in the abbey of Win chester; and in all probability, from her connec tion with that place, the princess by whose com mand these gorgeous habiliments were made. At all events they were brought to Chester-le-Street, then the seat of our northern see, in the year 934, by King Athelstan, and offered to St. Cuthbert. 6. A girdle and two bracelets, woven with threads of pure gold and scarlet silk ; the former flattened, like those of the stole and maniple above described. 7. A maniple of gold and scarlet silk of the most ingenious and ornamental texture, but from its shape and character belonging to a period a full century posterior to the year 1104 ; and, therefore, 71 placed within the coffin after that period. 8. A cross of pure gold, as has been ascertained by in vestigation, found upon the breast bone of the skele ton, slung from its neck by a cord of silk and gold thread, running through a bright loop of the latter material, and set with fifty three stones, apparently garnets. The cross, with the stones, weighs 15 dwts. 12 grs." The marvellous tale of the incorruptibility of the body inhumed with this splendid garniture, piously believed for so many centuries, and re peated by the writer of the Rites and Monuments, in his account of the demolition of the Shrine in 1540, was proved by the discoveries of 1827, (as indeed might have been expected) to have had no foundation. The bones of the skeleton were found in a perfectly dry state, and no trace whatever was observed of the decomposition of a human body having taken place since they had been deposited in the very ancient coffin whose fragments we have described. And what is more, there were palpa ble evidences of deception. The sockets of the eyes were filled with balls of a whitish composition, evidently intended to give that prominent appear ance under the face cloth which would have be longed to reality. The cerement which covered 72 the face, was according to Reginald, so closely attached that it appeared to have been glued, and could not be removed. We must not omit to mention that in the same coffin with the remains of St. Cuthbert was discovered a human scull, which was doubtless that of St. Oswald, King of Northumberland, the only relic which was allowed to remain by the side of the Saint on his translation in 1104.* St. Cuthbert is invariably represented on ancient seals, and in sculpture and painted glass, as holding in his hand the head of King Oswald. All the bones which had been exhumed, were again buried the same evening, carefully de posited in a new coffin. The fragments of the innermost coffin, with the portions of the robes, and other interesting relics which have been described, are preserved in a glass case in the MSS. closet of the Cathedral library. The stone effigies of Saints and Bishops and other carv ings which we mentioned above (p. 16) as having found a resting place in St. Cuthbert's Shrine, have been removed since our earliest pages were in print, and are now deposited (we hope only temporarily) in a vaulted chamber under the dor mitory, on the west side of the cloisters. How ever safe a repository this may be, many of them are sufficiently curious to induce the wish that they were in a place more accessible to those visi tants who take an interest even in the smallest " carving rare and quaint," which has once adorned the fabric of a holy place. Among them are figures of St. Cuthbert, with the head of Oswald in his hand, St. Anthony, St. Christopher, St. George and the Dragon, and the Archangel Michael combating the old serpent. There is also the stone coffin of Cospatric, Earl of March, and other cof- » Raine's St. Cuthbert, p, 81. 73 fin lids, one sculptured with a long bow and a rose. We may also mention some Norman corbels from the antient Chapter house. The Chapel of the Nine Altars is made use of for morning prayer by the University of Durham. The north aisle of the Choir possesses now no peculiar object of interest. The eastern extremity once presented a singular feature, namely the dwelling place of an anchorite. A porch (a word, by the way, of somewhat indefinite meaning) ex tended itself across the aisle, and contained an Altar, and a fair rood, " with most exquisite pic tures of Mary and John." In all probability the anchorite's dwelling was a small chamber over this; for we read in the Rites and Monuments of " the entrance to the anchoridge being up a fair pair of stairs adjoining to the north door of St. Cuthbert's Feretory." A long stone bench, on the north side of the aisle, with the arms of Skirlaw, remains as a memorial of that prelate. It was for the use of his bedesmen, who thus sat opposite the " fair mar ble stone sumptuously beset with many brazen images" under which their founder was buried, and offered their prayers for the repose of his soul. Bishop Skirlaw was buried between the two piers of the Choir opposite the Bishop's throne, but the monument which covered his remains has disap peared and the prayer of his bedesmen is heard no longer. A closed doorway at the north western end of this aisle led to the song school, formerly the Sacristan's Exchequer. The entrance into the aisle from the transept was occupied by another porch, with its altar. The windows of the south aisle have all been re - stored within the last year, in accordance with the character which they previously presented. They were of the decorated period, and were chiefly the H 74 work of Prior Forcer. This aisle possesses one distinguished ornament in the tomb of Bishop Hatfield, with its beautiful marble effigy, which has fortunately in a great measure escaped mutilation. The whole space above its canopy, up to the soffit of the arch of the two piers between which it stands, is filled by the back of the tabernacle work behind the Bishop's throne. As we have already said, however, we shall return and view the monu ments seriatim. A small Altar enclosed with iron railing stood beside the pier at the west end of Bishop Hatfield's tomb, at which masses were said for the repose of his soul. Nearly opposite, in the south wall of the aisle, is a closed doorway of very beautiful character, which formed the communi cation with the great vestry of the church, built a little before 1300. This vestry was in use till 1802, the period of its demolition. It originally contained " a peculiar altar, where the Bishop or his suffragans did use to say mass only at such time as they were to consecrate priests, or to give any holy orders."* The most distinguishing feature of this aisle, in the days of the Church's splendour, was the Black Rood of Scotland, a large crucifix of silver, with its attendant figures of the Blessed Virgin and St. John wrought in the same rich material, and crowned with gold. This appears to have been considered a very precious relic, having been taken at the battle of Neville's Cross, to which it had been brought by David Bruce, from the Abbey of Holyrood, as a talisman of victory. A reredos of wood-work, richly adorned with " curious painting," sprinkled with golden stars, ascending nearly to the height of the vaulting of the aisle, formed the back ground of the Rood. This reredos extended * Davies's Rites and Monuments, p. 33. 75 itself across the eastern end of the aisle, near to the southern entrance into St. Cuthbert's Feretory. Having thus completed our survey of the Church properly so called, and before proceeding to the Galilee, let us request our readers to re enter the Choir for a few moments, while we peo ple it in fancy with a few of the shadowy forms, which once, as living and breathing realities, were seen within its walls. Page after page of antient chronicle and legend recur to the memory, and when standing on the spot where the scenes took place which they so graphically describe, the actors in them seem to come forth before the mind's eye, each in his habit as he lived, clothed with all the vividness of life and truth. Thus, for instance, we may take our stand in some quiet corner and evoke the closing scene of Bishop Flambard's life. The dying prelate, worn and wasted with sickness, was borne at his own request into the Church, and placed before the High Altar. With groans and deep remorse he confessed before the assembled monks the cupidity which had impelled him to grasp their possessions, and the malevolence which had excited him to violate their rightful privileges. "I would have injured you," he confessed to them, even more deeply than I have, had it been in my power."* He then offered his ring upon the altar, as a symbol of restitution, conscience having thus asserted her supremacy at the last hour of a life which had " exhibited a tissue of violence and ambition, illumined only by a few splendid traits of generosity and magnificence. "t There is something very affecting in the deep contrition which thus came to the very house of God, even in the anguish of the dying hour. Again, let * Symeon : Dunelm : Hist, continuatio, p. 260., Ed. Tho. Bedford, 1732. f SURTEES, vol. 1., p. XX. 76 us fancy ourselves present at the solemnities of Easter, while ' the House' was yet untouched by the hand of the spoiler, and while the " Paschal" candlestick with its seven branches "glistening as the gold itself," stood in all its splendour before the High Altar. Early on the morning of Easter day came two of the oldest brethren, and took out of the sepulchre " a marvellous beautiful image of our Saviour, representing the Resur rection, with a cross in His hand, in the breast whereof was enclosed, in most bright chrystal, the Holy Sacrament of the Altar." The image was then brought to the High Altar, amid fragrant clouds of incense and the sweet notes of the an them of Christus Resurgens, chanted forth by the rest of the brethren in full choir. A procession was then formed, and it was carried round the church with great solemnity, " four antient gen tlemen belonging to the Prior," holding over it a " rich canopy of purple velvet, the whole quire waiting upon it with goodly torches and great store of lights ; all singing, rejoicing and praying to God most devoutly."* Strange and unwonted as either of these scenes would now appear to us, they were yet not out of harmony with the place, but scenes stranger still, singularly unbefitting its sacredness have been acted within these walls. A wild scene took place on the Sunday following the feast of St. Bartholomew, in the year 1303. Bishop An tony Bee had determined that a Prior of his own choice should be at the head of the convent, but having been balked in this by the election which they made, he sent down a strong party of stal wart foresters from the wild values of the Tyne and Wear to compel submission, who, if antient chro- * Davies's Rites and Monuments, pp. 23, 24. nicies speak sooth, used most unceremonious means for the enforcement of their Master's will. They found the false Prior (as they regarded him) and six and forty of his monks, in their stalls in the choir, engaged in the celebration of Divine offices. With grisly oaths and fierce threats they demanded that he should give place to the Bishop's nominee. To no clamour or intimidation, how ever, would the Prior yield, but maintained with calmness and dignity his right to the seat he oc cupied. Whereupon they turned their siege into a blockade, and kept the unfortunate Prior and his six and forty monks confined to the choir for three whole days, without any food saving six loaves and sixteen herrings. Finding at last that even the prospect of starvation was unavailing to procure submission, they laid their sacrilegious hands on the good father, plucked him from his stall, and shut him up in the Common house.* From hence they removed him to the Castle, and at last, wearied out by their violence, and afraid of his life, he yielded. It would appear from this strange story that the relations in which the Bishop and his Monks stood to each other, were by no means at all times so pleasant or amicable as the admiration of mediceval proprieties might lead some to imagine. Another scene rises up before us, of an affray on the very steps of the Altar, between the retainers of the Lord Neville and the Monks. An offer ing of a stag was annually made on St. Cuthbert's day in September, by the Nevilles of Raby, and Ralph, Lord Neville (whose son also named Ralph, was the first layman buried within the Cathedral) * The Common house was on the west side of the Cloister. It was the only apartment where the Monks had the indulgence of a fire, and appears to nave been the place to which they resorted for conversation with each other. It still remains, though curtailed in its dimensions by taking off' the Song school and Minor Canon's vestry. 78 claimed that himself and as many as he might bring with him, should be feasted by the Prior upon the occasion. To this the Prior demurred, as a thing that had never before been claimed as of right, and as being a most expensive and onerous burden, for the trains of the great nobility of that day were numerous in the extreme. The result was that the Prior declined to accept the stag when laid before the shrine, by which they of the Ne ville were so grievously offended that from words they got to blows, and began to cuff the Monks who were ministering at the Altar. The latter, upon this occasion, were not contented to offer a mere passive resistance, for they made such good use of the large wax candles which they carried, in belabouring their opponents, as to compel them to retreat. The retainers of the Neville did not however condescend to take back again the stag, which, as they deemed, had been so uncourteously refused. Much as our age is accused of lack of reverence for holy things and holy places (and in some respects not very unjustly) it may yet be well doubted whether any thing at all approaching to the irreverence of such a scene could be parallelled at this day. The stag was an oblation by the Nevilles of great antiquity, and appears to have been brought into the church and presented with winding of horns and all the ceremonial of the " noble art of venerie." Allusion is made to this custom in that " very oldest rhyme of the North," as it is called by Surtees, the lament for Robert Neville, grandsire of Ralph Neville, whom we have just mentioned : SKHri, qiua sal tirtr iiomes ilatt, $jal» ftoo tJ)i iias ? j£ott is i)e iebt ano lies lain front to ulatu tjatm as. 79' Another tumultuous scene, in which the Ne villes also bore a chief part, took place here in 1569, well known as the year in which a desperate, but ineffectual struggle was made by the Earls of Westmoreland and Northumberland for the re storation of the antient faith, to which the Nor thern provinces were, in general, very deeply attached. A lively picture of the proceedings in the Cathedral is contained in the depositions of the clergy and others* who were called to give ac count as to how they demeaned themselves, when " two Altars were set up in the Cathedral at com mandment of Mr. Cuthbert Nevill." One of the altar-stones it appears was "hid in the centry- garth, under much metal. Various persons helped — rolling and lifting the stones into the church. The priest of Brancepeth was the Overseer of all their working, first and last till the Altars were finished, one being the High-Altar — the other set beside the clock." George Cliff, a prebendary, acknowledges that he was present when mass was sung by Robert Peirson (the Neville's chaplain) on St. Andrew's day, but that he sat still in his stall and did not sing at it nor look at the elevation. Some of the " petty canons" however acknowledge themselves to have been"faulters and favorers,"and to have "helped to sing matins and masses, and to have gone in procession twice or thrice, after the cross, within the Cathedral." " The press of peo ple" is described as being very great. Indeed it is evident that the hearts of the population with few exceptions, were with the insurgent nobles. The feeling of attachment for the old religion, " lay like lees at the bottom of men's hearts, and if the vessel were ever so little stirred, came to the top." * See Slr C Sharp's Memorials of the Rebellion of 1569, p. 252- 80 In contrast with these stirring scenes we may picture the stately trains of Royalty passing up the nave and entering to worship within the choir. Jn 1617 King James I. visited Durham, and came in state to the Cathedral ; and in 1633, his unfor tunate son, our Royal Martyr, was received and ushered into the Church with great solemnity. At Elvet head, " he mounted his horse, and was mett by Sir William Belasyse, High Sheriff, and the gentlemen of the county, who gave all the Sheriff's livery, two hundred men ; viz., — ash-coloured cloth lined with red bays and plush capes, four fingers broad, and two broad silver laces. As soon as his Majesty lighted, he went first to the Abbey Church, before he went to the Castle ; a canopy of state was borne over him by eight Prebendarys into the Church, where he staid service ; and a speech was made to him by Dean Hunt. Then his Majesty went to the Castle; and on Sun day morning heard a sermon at the Abbey from the Bishop, where none were admitted but his Nobles, the Clergy, and Choir. After service he dined at the Deanery, at the Bishop's charge ; where his Majesty had a cope that cost 140/. be longing to the Church, presented to him. Then he attended evening prayer ; and after went to the Castle, where he kept his Court during all the time he was at Durham, and did touch divers for the King's evil." What a change a few years made. In 1650 the Cathedral Church of Durham was occupied by the Scottish prisoners, taken by Cromwell, at the battle of Dunbar, and its Royal visitor of 1633 had laid his " grey discrowned head" on a bloody scaf fold. " O heavy times, "begetting such events !" The defacing of the monuments, and the de- 81 struction of the old tabernacle work of the Choir and the stained windows is attributed, as we have already observed, to the miserable prisoners who were confined within these walls. In all probability, however, their Puritan warders had full as much to do with it. With these brief and imperfect sketches of the shadowy past, we conclude this part of our sub ject. When reflecting upon some of them, it were well to ask ourselves the question, whether we be as thankful as we ought for the times of peace and order in which it has pleased Provi dence to cast our lot. THE GALILEE. Retracing our steps down the southern aisle, and passing through Bishop Langley's doorway, at its extremity, we enter the Galilee. We owe its erection to Bishop Pudsay, who after his design of building a Lady Chapel at the east end of the Choir was frustrated,* transferred his labours to the western extremity of the Church, where he commenced and carried on to completion the singularly interesting Chapel within which we now stand. It was dedicated to the Blessed Virgin, and intended more particularly as a place of worship for the female sex, who, as is well known, were not permitted to enter within the precincts of St. Cuthbert's Church. The origin * See ante, p. 54. 82 of its designation of Galilee, by which it has in variably been distinguished, appears to be involved in some obscurity, and different reasons have been assigned for the use of the term. The author of the Rites and Monuments tells us, " it is called the Galilee, by reason (as some think) of the translation of the same ; being once begun, and afterwards removed ; whereupon it took the name of Galilee : to which place such as repaired had granted to them sundry pardons." It is probable that these " sundry pardons" may refer to the per mission which Cardinal Langley obtained from the Pope for the erection of a font within its walls, to which persons excommunicate, were allowed to bring their children, in order that they might not lack the benefit of Holy Baptism, and to the like privilege which was accorded, as regards this place, when the realm was under an Interdict. And gratefully indeed must the boon have been then received. We can happily form little idea of the deep unhappiness which was felt under its inflic tion. Gaufrid de Coldingham, a Monk of Dur ham, gives a touching detail of the melancholy changes it occasioned. " The Altars," he says, " stood in the nakedness of desolation, being strip ped of all their sacred garniture. The devout me lody of the accustomed chants was hushed, and the soothing chime of matin or vesper bell was no longer heard. The holy solemnities of religion were at an end, and every observance which the piety of past ages had instituted in God's praise and honour was no more. No kindly hand pre sented to the lips of the dying the healing symbol of his Redeemer's sacrifice, and even the last offices of Christian burial were denied to his poor remains."* Mr. Surtees suggests that the » Hist. Dunelm: Scriptores III. p. 2S. (published by the Surtees Society.) 83 text " Ite in Galileam, nunciate fratibus meis ut eant in Galileam : ibi me videbunt," as ap plied to the consolation thus given to the miser able, may have given rise to the name. There was a custom, however, among the monks of the Benedictine rule, to make a procession at cer tain times round their church and cloister, and to halt at certain stations, in memory of the Re surrection and of the various times at which our Lord afterwards appeared to His disciples. His last appearance was on a mountain in Galilee, and it is therefore not improbable that the place where the procession made its final halt should have re ceived that name. The general effect on entering the Chapel is striking in the extreme. A multiplicity of tall slender columns with semi-circular arches, pro fusely adorned with the zig-zag ornament, present an interior bearing more resemblance to the light ness and variety of the Saracenic than to the soli dity and plainness which was so universal a cha racteristic of the Norman style, even iu its transi tion towards early English, of which this building was an example. The number of its aisles gives an apparent complexity to the arrangement which adds much to its effect upon first entering, and the bright hues of the antient frescoes which still adorn one of the arched recesses of its eas tern wall, remain to shew to us how admirably colour was applied, as an accessary to form, by the architects of the olden time. The labels and mouldings of all the arches, shew manifest traces of the same adornment, and the piers of the central arch, which was originally the great western doorway of the Church, were delicately covered with a fair pattern of tracery and flowers, of vermilion upon a ground of pure white, much of which still remains. 84 In form the Chapel is a parallelogram, 76 feet from north to south, and 47 from east to west. It may be described as consisting of a nave with double aisles on each side. The piers and arches by which they are formed are uniform. In their original state the piers were not clustered, but pre sented two detached marble columns with early English bases and capitals, the latter united under one abacus, supporting Norman arches, enriched both on their faces and soffits with the zig-zag ornament. The repetition of these detached columns must have produced an effect of most singular lightness and elegance. We can form an idea of the appearance they presented from those against the western wall which have been suffered to remain in their pristine condition. The shafts of stone which transformed them into clustered piers, were added by Cardinal Langley, who, hav ing heightened all the walls, was probably afraid lest the superincumbent weight should prove too much to be supported by those slender columns. Previous to Cardinal Langley's alterations, se veral changes had been made in the fabric as left by Pudsay. His north doorway indeed remains with its Norman characteristics, but both the north and south wall, if not entirely rebuilt at a later period, at all events received windows of early de corated character as did also the western extre mities of the two outermost aisles on the north and south. As left by its founder, it must have been principally lighted from the west by Norman windows. There are obvious traces also of lights above the arches of the aisles next to the nave. The present roof, and the three great perpendicular western windows are all the work of Cardinal Lang- ley. The early decorated southern windows have been carefully restored within the last few years. 85 A stone bench extends itself under the windows, on the north, west, and south sides. Below the great west window of the nave stood " a fair iron pulpit, with bars of iron for one to hold them by going up the steps into the pulpit ; where one of the monks preached every Holy-day and Sunday, at one in the afternoon."* Underneath the same window is a deep recess, with a low vaulted roof, open to the Chapel. It is not very obvious to what use it can have been applied. Another apartment of similar character, with two small lights looking to the river, is entered by a small doorway at the end of the aisle which adjoins on the north, and has in all probability been a Sacristy or Revestry. The font which Cardinal Langley erected for the kindly purpose we have already mentioned, stood at the west end of the southern most aisle. Under the great arch at the east end of the nave of the Chapel, which as we before stated was the great western entrance to the Church, was the chantry and altar of the Blessed Virgin. The altar stone, of blue marble, with its five crosses, yet remains. It is laid down level with the floor of the chantry, which until very recently formed a deep recess under the arch, which as our readers may remember we mentioned as having been closed up by Cardinal Langley. Tt has lately been opened out, with little advantage, as it appears to us to the general effect. Looking from the nave of the Ca thedral into the Galilee, no adequate advantage is gained as regards the view of the latter, the level of its floor being so much lower ; and although when standing in the Galilee, there is doubtless a magnificent vista opened out, and a splendid per spective of columns and arches, yet there is room * Davies's Rites and Monuments, p. 80. I 86 for more than a doubt, in our opinion, whether this be not too dearly purchased at the expence of the distinctness of the two buildings, and the loss of that feeling of secluded and quiet solemnity which the Galilee, as it was, was so calculated to convey to the mind. The charm is broken. If we may use the expression, the eye seems to take in too much : for the close proximity of the gigan tic proportions of the huge nave-piers and arches of the Cathedral, destroys in the Galilee that unity of effect and repose which it should be the chief object of art to obtain. Though of very minor im portance, we regret the consequent removal of the screen-work of the Altar which had stood within the recess since the days of Langley. It was the only fragment which remained to shew the cha racter of that which adorned all the altars, and was curious on that account. It was the same which is described in the Rites and Monuments as being "finely adorned with curious wainscot work above-head, at the back, and at either end of the altar." Much of this wainscot-work remained, but, as might be expected, the "most heavenly pictures, so lively in colours, and gilt," which adorned it in the days of its splendour, were all defaced. Little remained to testify of its former gorgeousness save a few sentences in honour of the Blessed Virgin, in gilt letters, on a blue ground. Cardinal Langley prepared a tomb for himself, in front of the Altar. It is of blue marble, project ing into the nave of the Chapel, and seven steps of the same material, on either side of the tomb, form the ascent to the altar. A small doorway in the wall with which Langley closed up the arch way formed the priest's entrance into the chantry from the nave of the Cathedral. The inscription over the arch, gjtttriauitt $t$Q'*Ht t$t. &0* 87 mine JBtm fca aetbo tuo tov intelligent ut mtiirct populu' tun* et Siseemat inter fiOtttl' et malum, has reference to the Consis tory Court, which was held in the Galilee previous to, and long after the Reformation. It is now again held there, since the aisle of the transept where its sittings afterwards took place has been laid open to the rest of the Church. Beneath the arched recess at the east end of the adjoining aisle, which is adorned by the beautiful specimens of fresco painting to which we have alluded, stood the Altar of our Lady of Pitty.* The arch of the recess is Norman, with the zig zag ornament, and its soffit is beautifully painted with a running pattern of leaves of a fanciful cha racter. The colours are few, being principally browns and yellows upon a bright ultramarine ground, but the blending of the whole is most har monious. The back of the recess has a represen tation of drapery, and on the sides stand the stately figures of Richard the Lion-hearted and the mu nificent prelate to whom the Galilee owes its erection. On the wall above the arch may be dimly seen the traces of another fresco painting, which has apparently filled the whole space of the wall. It is too much obliterated to be able to make out the design, but we learn from the Rites and Monuments that this and the corresponding- portion of the wall belonging to the southern aisle were ornamented with " great pictures," repre senting the scenes of our Saviour's Passion. A similar recess occupies the eastern extremity of the first aisle to the south. Under this stood the Altar of the Venerable Beda, whose massy tomb of blue marble still stands before it. Like St. Cuthbert, he is buried under the place where » See ante, p. 29. 88 his shrine was of old exalted. After Bishop Pud- say finished the Galilee, he " caused a Feretory of gold and silver to be made," in which were depo sited the bones of the venerable saint. This was placed upon a slab of blue marble, which was sup ported by five pillars of the same material, about a yard in height. It had " a fair cover of wainscot, very curiously gilt, and appointed to draw up and down over the shrine, when they pleas'd to shew the sumptuousness thereof."* The marble slab upon which the shrine of Beda rested had " three holes in every corner, for irons to be fastened in, to guide the covering when it was drawn up, or let down.+" The very stone which is thus de scribed may be seen between the third and fourth piers, reckoning from the west, on the south side of the nave of the Cathedral, where it forms part of the pavement. In the year 1831 the tomb was opened for the purpose of ascertaining the truth of the tradition that the bones of the saint had been interred in this place, after the demolition of his shrine. About three feet below the surface many of the bones of a human skeleton were found, which had evidently been placed within a coffin, of which some fragments remained, though in a state of great decay. A detailed relation of the bones which were found and of their state and appearance may be found in Mr. Raine's Brief Account of Durham Cathedral, &c, p. 80. Some abbey- pieces and a ring which were found while making the exhumation, were deposited in the Cathedral Library. The bones were re-interred, and the old epitaph, to which a well known legendary history is attached, was engraven upon the marble which covered them : — * Davies's Rites and Monuments, p. 77. t Ibid, p. 161. 89 HAC SUNT IN FOSSA BED^E VENERABILIS OSSA. The western windows of the Chapel, like almost all the other windows of the Church glowed with the bright hues of stained glass, long since shat tered and broken. That which now fills some of the upper lights of the windows has been recently inserted, and is made up of fragments which had been tossing about in some neglected corner. The author of the Rites and Monuments gives a minute description of the painted glass with which they were once filled. The Adoration of the Magi, the Annunciation, the Assumption of the Blessed Vir gin, and many scenes in the life of Christ were among the subjects which were delineated. There were also many portraits of Kings and Bishops, to whom reverence was due as benefactors of the Church. Amongst these " Thomas Langley, Bis hop," was conspicuous, " in fine coloured glass, with his mitre on his head, and his crosier-staff in his left hand, as he was accustomed to say mass ; having his arms very excellently blazoned in fine colour'd glass above his head." The new order of things which arose after the Reformation found no use for the Galilee as a place of worship, but with extraordinary carelessness (to use no harsher term) which has happily been su perseded, in our time, by better feeling, it was de voted to the most secular purposes, with the sole exception of being occasionally used as a place of burial. The north aisle was enclosed by a wall, as the Register Office of the Consistory Court, and the rest of the building was used as a depository for all sorts of lumber. In the year 1828 the Dean and Chapter swept away all its defilements, and resolved to open it for Evening Service on the 90 Sundays during the summer months. From Easter to Michaelmas in each succeeding year this service has been continued. To the good taste of the Chapter, or rather let us say to a much higher motive, we owe it, that the disfigurement of pews does not exist. Rows of plain open benches fill the area, and are indiscriminately occupied by all ranks. The most sturdy adherents of the pew-system (we hope a decreasing number) would surely find their prejudices shaken by attending an evening service in the Galilee of Durham Cathedral. The effect is certainly striking alike to the eye and the mind. To the eye it is most beautiful, when entering on some fine autumnal evening the last rays of the set ting sun are gleaming through the large western windows of the Chapel, and then, as the shades of the evening deepen into gloom, a few lamps, which before are almost unperceived, shed a " dim, reli gious light" over the kneeling congregation. The beautiful architecture of the building never, cer tainly, assumes a more striking appearance ; here, thrown out in bold and strong relief, there, in deep shadow. But this, although well calculated to excite feelings which if not those of devotion, are at least akin to it, causes but a transient emotion, when compared with the moral effect produced by the sight of so large a congregation of worshippers, both rich and poor, unmarked by the distinctions which human pride has introduced into the very Temple of Him in whose sight we are all equal. 91 THE MONUMENTS. Quidnam sibi saxa cavata ? Quid pulchra volunt monumenta ? Res quod nisi creditur illis Non mortua, sed data somno. Prudentii Hymn. circ. exaequias defuncti. For what do mean our beauteous monuments, And carved stones, which seem their watch to keep Over the dead, — but that in those still tents The inmate is not perish'd, but asleep. Translation by Rev. I. Williams. We now proceed to point out a few of the more remarkable monuments in the Church ; for to par ticularize every tablet which the affection or respect of relatives and friends has caused to be erected, would be inconsistent with the object and limits of a work like the present. They speak sufficiently for themselves to those whose attention is arrested by the names which they commemorate. We shall merely mention some which are remarkable for their antiquity or beauty, and some which call forth our reverence for the memories of those who sleep beneath them. Among this latter class there is no tomb we can contemplate which more power fully excites that feeling than the one which hal lows that part of the fabric which we have last been surveying. Our readers will of course anti cipate the name of Beda. We have little to add in the way of description, to what we have men tioned with regard to the place of his rest. It is an Altar-tomb of the plainest description : the top being a large slab of blue marble, on which are engraven the two lines we mentioned above, (p. 89.) But Beda requires no costly tomb, no laboured epitaph. In the seclusion of the monastic walls 92 of Jarrow he passed his life, and long and seques tered though it was, it seems all too short for the acquisition of his learning, and the execution of his voluminous works. Unrelaxing indeed must have been the diligence, and deep the thought of that venerable man, by whom in so remote a place, in an age of so much ignorance, and with helps and opportunities in the way of books and learned in tercourse so small and confined, so much was accomplished. His Ecclesiastical History is the work by which he is chiefly known, but this forms a very small part of his writings. There is scarcely a book of Holy Scripture on which he did not write annotations, and Poetry and Natural History are also found among the subjects of his treatises. Neither is our wonder diminished, when we are informed that of the many observances which his monastic vows entailed, and which occupied no small portion of the hours of each day, there was not one which he did not religiously and constantly practise. During his life he appears to have been little known, at least any efforts which may have been made to draw him from his cell were in vain. " Whilst living," says Symeon Dunelmensis, " he lay hidden in a far off nook of the world, but now being dead, there is not a part of the world to which his fame has not been carried by his works." And he left no compeer behind him. " Upon his death," says William of Malmesbury, " almost all knowledge of history down to our present times, went to the grave with him. For whilst one still succeeded lazier than another, all spirit of study and industry was quite extinct in the island." " The lamp of learning trimmed by the hand of a single monastic who never passed the limits of his Northumbrian province, irradiated from the cell of Jarrow the Saxon realm of England with a clear 93 and steady light ; and when Bede died, History reversed her torch, and quenched it in deep night."* " The saint, the scholar, from a circle freed, Of toil stupendous in a hallowed seat Of learning, where thou heard'st the billow beat On a wild coast, rough monitors to feed Perpetual industry ! sublime recluse ! The recreant soul that dares to shun the debt Imposed on human kind, must first forget Thy diligence, thy unrelaxing use Of a long life ; and in the hour of death The last dear service of thy passing breath." We cannot resist the temptation of giving our rea ders the account thus alluded to of the last hours of this remarkable man, extracted from the simple and touching relation of his pupil Cuthbert. " He was much troubled with shortness of breath, yet without pain, before the day of our Lord's resur rection, that is, about a fortnight ; and thus he afterwards passed his life, cheerful and rejoicing, giving thanks to Almighty God every day and night, nay, every hour, till the day of our Lord's Ascension, and daily read lessons to us his disciples, and whatever remained of the day, he spent in singing psalms ; he also passed all the night awake, in joy and thanksgiving, unless a short sleep pre vented it ; in which case he no sooner awoke than he presently repeated his wonted exercises, and ceased not to give thanks to God with uplifted hands. I declare with truth, that I have never seen with my eyes, nor heard with my ears, any man so earnest in giving thanks to the living God. O truly happy man ! He chanted the sentence of St. Paul the Apostle, It is dreadful to fall into the hands of the living God, and much more out of Holy Writ ; wherein also he admonished us to think of our last hour, and to shake off the sleep » SURTEES, vol. II. p. 69. 94 of the soul He also sang Anti- phons according to our custom and his own, one of which is ' O glorious King, Lord of all Power, who, triumphing this day, didst ascend above all the Heavens ; do not forsake us orphans ; but send down upon us the Spirit of Truth, which was promised to us by the Father. Hallelujah !' And when he came to that word, ' do not forsake us', he burst into tears and wept much, and an hour after he began to repeat what he had commenced, and we, hearing it, mourned with him He often repeated ' That God scourgeth every son whom He receiveth,' and much more out of Holy Scripture ; as also this sentence from St. Ambrose, ' I have not lived so as to be ashamed to live among you ; nor do I fear to die, because we have a gracious God.' During these days he laboured to compose two works well worthy to be remem bered, besides the lessons we had from him, and singing of Psalms ; viz. he translated the Gospel of St. John as far as the words ' But what are these among so many, &c.,'into our own tongue, for the benefit of the Church ; and some collections out of the Book of Notes of Bishop Isidorus, saying : ' I will not have my pupils read a falsehood, nor labour therein without profit after my death.' When the Tuesday before the Ascension of our Lord came, he began to suffer still more in his breathing, and a small swelling appeared in his feet ; but he passed all that day and dictated cheerfully, and now and then among other things, said, ' Go on quickly, I know not how long I shall hold out, and whether my Maker will not soon take me away.' But to us he seemed very well to know the time of his departure ; and so he spent the night, awake, in thanksgiving; and when the morning appeared, that is, Wednesday, he ordered 95 us to write with all speed what he had begun ; and this done, we walked till the third hour with the relics of saints, according to the custom of that day. There was one of us with him, who said to him, * most dear master, there is still one chapter want ing : do you think it troublesome to be asked any more questions ?' He answered, ' it is no trouble. Take your pen, and make ready, and write fast.' Which he did, but at the ninth hour he said to me, ' I have some little articles of value in my chest, such as pepper, napkins, and incense : run quickly, and bring the priests of our monastery to me, that I may distribute among them the gifts which God has bestowed on me. The rich in this world are bent on giving gold and silver and other precious things. But I, in charity, will joyfully give my brethren what God has given unto me'. He spoke to every one of them, admonishing and entreating them that they would carefully say masses and prayers for him, which they readily promised; but they all mourned and wept, espe cially because he said, ' They should no more see his face in this world.' They rejoiced for that he said. ' It is time that I return to Him who formed me out of nothing : I have lived long ; my merciful J udge well foresaw my life for me ; the time of my dissolution draws nigh ; for I desire to die and to be with Christ.' Having said much more, he passed the day joyfully till the evening ; and the boy, above-mentioned, said : ' Dear master, there is yet one sentence not written.' He answered, 'write quickly.' Soon after, the boy said, 'The sentence is now written.' He replied, ' It is well, you have said the truth. It is ended. Receive my head into your hands, for it is a great satisfac tion to me to sit facing my holy place, where I was wont to pray, that I may also sitting call upon my 96 Father.' And thus on the pavement of his little cell, singing : ' Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost,' when he had named the Holy Ghost, he breathed his last, and so de parted to the Kingdom of Heaven."* The next which attracts attention in this part of the building, Cardinal Langley's tomb, is part and parcel of the raised floor of the Chantry which he founded. The only portion which has received any adornment is the head of the tomb on which three shields of his arms (paly of six, argent and vert, on the second pale a mullet of the first) are carved in bold and strong relief, Cardinal Lang ley became Bishop of Durham in 1406, and pre sided over the see for the long period of thirty-one years. " His age," says Surtees, " was spent in honourable retirement within his diocese. His public works were munificent and numerous. He repaired the beautiful western Chapel of the Gali lee, and he joined with the Prior and Convent in completing the structure of the Cathedral Clois ters. He built the whole of the old Gaol, with its massy gateway, and he founded two Schools on the Palace Green, the one for grammar, the other for plain-song. At Howden he built the western gateway leading to the Orchard, and a fair lodge adjoining. He was a benefactor to the pub lic libraries of Cambridge and Oxford, and to those of Durham House in Oxford, St. Mary's of Lei cester, and the College at Manchester."! He was buried in the Galilee by his own desire, ex pressed in his will. Excepting the records of mortality engraven on the floor, the Galilee has no other sepulchral me^ * From the life of Bede, prefixed to vol. 11. of a translation of his Histori cal works by J. A. Giles, L. L. D. See also Symeon Dunelm. pp. 72, et seq. ed Tho. Bedford, 1732. t Sorters, vol. i. p. lvi. 97 morial which deserves the name of a monument, unless we may give that name to a wooden tablet, with an inscription in gilt letters to the memory of Dean Hunt. It was originally affixed to a pier in the Choir of the Cathedral, near the Bishop's throne. Several of the marble slabs which form part of the pavement in this and other parts of the Cathedral, present manifest indications of hav ing been adorned with brasses, but in their exist ing state no traces remain whereupon to found a conjecture as to whom they cover. A quaint epitaph remains upon a flat stone in the nave of the Galilee, to the memory of Mr. John Brimley, Organist of the Cathedral and Master of the Cho risters from 1557 to 1576. JOHN BRIMLE1S BODY HERE DOTH LY, WHO PRAYSED GOD WITH HAND AND VOICE ; BY MUSICKES HEAVENLY HARMONIE DULL MYNDES HE MAID IN GOD REJOICE. HIS SOUL INTO THE HEAVENS IS LYFT, TO PRAYSE HIM STILL THAT GAVE THE GYFT. Master Brimley it would appear, was one who was called to account as to his demeanour during the brief re-establishment of the mass in Durham Cathedral, to which we have already adverted, (p. 79.) The report he gives of himself is, that " he was twice at mass, when Robert Peirson, with Homes, sung the same, within the Cathedral ; but he sung not himself, but played at orgainesj and did, divers times, help to sing psalmes at mattins and even-song, and played on the organs ; and went in procession, as others did, after the Cross. He heard a piece of Holmes' sermon : he spoke much in commendation of the pope ; he bad the people kneel down to be reconciled — he kneeled also. He received holy water, but no holy bread, ' to K 98 his wytting.' Is sorry for the same. He did it by compulsion."* Notwithstanding all this con trition, the deposition of his friend the Curate of St. Gilest would almost lead one to infer that good Master Brimley had no very great horror of the pro ceedings. Pleasant looks, at any rate, appear to have passed between them on the occasion : "when the sacring bell rung — he looked up to Mr. Brim ley, then in the loft, over the quire door, and smiled at him." However, his contrition was accepted as genuine, and the old Master of the Quiristers went down to his grave in peace. We will now leave the Galilee and again pass into the nave of the Cathedral, where the monu ments of the Nevilles tell their tale of departed greatness and puritan mutilation. Hard by the southern door of the Galilee, however, our attention is first of all attracted by a monument against the western wall of the Cathedral, which though of comparatively modern date, and of no very striking character, most assuredly comes within our sphere of notice. It is erected to the memory of Sir George Wheler, who was buried in the Galilee, and, at his own desire, as near as might be to the remains of the Venerable Beda. He was a traveller into the East at a time when such tours were more an indication of energy and thirst for knowledge than at present, and on his return in 1 682, he published a very interesting account of his travels, with copious notices of antiquities and observations upon the natural productions of the countries which he visited. " It is written," says Surtees, "in an easy, unaffected style, and in seve ral passages breathes forth a spirit of genuine piety and goodness." We cannot forbear quoting the * Sir C Sharp's Memorials, &c p. 260. t Ibid, p. 253. 99 passage which Surtees gives as an example. It were well if foreign travel produced upon the many who in our day indulge in it, the same spirit of thankfulness which it seems to have fostered in this happy-minded and excellent man. "And now," says Mr. Wheler on his return to England, " I thanked God that he had placed the lot of my inheritance in a land that he had blessed and hedged about for himself; where nothing is wanting to supply the defects of frail nature ; but where Peace and Plenty embrace each other ; where every man's right, from the prince to the peasant, is se cured to him by the protection of good and whole some laws ; and more by a king who is the indul gent father of his country, and not a tyrant ; and lastly rendered me into the bosom of a Church, that I had often heard, but now knew, to be the most refined, pure, and orthodox Church in the world, freed from slavery, error, and superstition, and, without novelty or confusion, established in purity of doctrine, decency, and order." On his return from the east, he was knighted, and soon after entered into Holy Orders. His family con nections, which were of high rank, his marriage hav ing allied him to Granville, Earl of Bath, son of the brave and loyal Sir Bevil Granville, recommended him in all probability to the notice of Lord Crewe, from whom he received a stall in Durham Cathe dral and the Rectory of Houghton-le-Spring. His travels into Greece appear to have excited in him a strong desire to establish such a friendly relation with the Greek Church as might hereafter pave the way to inter-communion between the members of that Church and our own. Such at least, judg ing from his kindly and charitable feelings, we take to have been the object of his encouragement of a proposed establishment of a college for Greek 100 Priests. Much quiet good sense and excellent feeling is displayed in several letters which he wrote on the subject of this college, and respecting the course of study to be pursued by a Greek stu dent named Dionysius.* Amongst other things, he expresses a wish that his opinions as a Divine may be formed " by reading rather than argumen tation," by " letting him know the respect we have always had for the Greek Church, and the little difference there is between us in points of any moment — none in fundamentals ; that we adhere close to the Scriptures, and for the interpretation of them to the Primitive Fathers and first Coun cils." Mr. Surtees, with characteristic delicacy of pen, thus concludes his biographical sketch of Sir George Wheler. " Many interesting traits of his character and disposition may be gathered from his printed works (which afford the strongest in ternal evidence of coming from the heart as well as the head,) and from much of his correspondence, which is still preserved in the family. His reli gion, though austere in regard to himself, never rendered him harsh or severe in his judgment of others, and, however strict in his own observances, he was neither an enemy to innocent recreations nor to personal accomplishments, when consistent with the purity of the Christian character ; and though sincerely attached, both by judgment and inclination, to the discipline and institutes of that Church of which he was a member, his zeal and charity embraced the whole Christian world. Nor will it on the whole, perhaps, be more than justice to conclude, that few ever more happily united the dignified manners and sentiments of birth and rank with the venerable simplicity and modesty of the Christian pastor, than Sir George Wheler. "f * For these letters see Surtees, vol. i. pp. 174-5. \ Surtees, vol i., p. 172. 101 Passing up the Nave we come to the tomb of John Lord Neville, and his wife Maude, daughter of Henry, Lord Percy. It is an altar tomb, the sides of which are filled with a series of cano pied niches, each of which has been tenanted by its separate figure of priest, or soldier, or holy nun, many of which are still remaining, The canopies of these niches are of very elaborate workmanship ; the head of the canopy projecting in front, and assuming the form of a square trefoiled arch, the top being adorned with a small battlemented moulding, and the sides with crockets. Internally the head of the canopy is cuspated and its interior groined with numerous small rib mouldings. The first of the inner mouldings of the sides of the niche is carried round under the head of the canopy, en riched by the insertion at intervals of the four-leaved flower ornament. The space between each niche is divided into two stages, the square heads of which are filled internally with a trefoil headed moulding. In each of these stages is suspended a shield, al ternately carved with the bearings of Neville and Percy. The spaces between the uppermost of these compartments and the entablature of the tomb are each filled with two beautifully carved leaves. The entablature itself (if we may apply the term) has consisted of a succession of square pannels running round the tomb, alternately filled with small trefoil -headed arches and the four- leaved flower ornament Between the basement and the mouldings which run beneath the niches and other compartments, is a repetition, at inter vals of some width, of the square flat four-leaved flower. Enough still remains to shew what the beauty of this monument must have been when fresh from the hands of the carver, but there is scarcely a figure which remains uninjured in its 102 niche, or a cusp or crocket which is unmutilated, and the alabaster effigies of the lordly Neville and his high-born dame, which lay recumbent on the top, are so shattered and broken as scarcely to re tain their semblance to the human form. The saltire of the Neville may be dimly traced on the surcoat of his armour. Some faint vestiges of gold and colours shew that the niches and ornaments of the tomb had received this enrichment, an em bellishment which was doubtless also extended to the effigies. John, Lord Neville, to commemo rate whom it was erected, " filled many offices of the highest trust and honor. He was at different periods Warden of the East Marches, Governor of Bamburgh, High Admiral of England, Lieu tenant of Acquitaine, and Seneschal of Bourdeaux. To this warlike Baron is to be chiefly attributed the building of the splendid pile of Raby, which he had a licence to castellate in 1379. He had a similar licence to make a castle of his manor-house of Sheriff Hutton in 1382. In 1385 he attended Richard II. on his expedition into Scotland. The nobility of the North formed the rearward, and Lord Neville's train consisted of two hundred men-at-arms and three hundred archers. He died at Newcastle-on-Tyne in 1388."* Close by this tomb, in the southern aisle, is the monumental slab of Robert Neville, Bishop of Durham. It is of blue marble, and the outline of the brass which once adorned it is distinctly visi ble, so that fancy may easily fill up the figure of the Bishop in his pontifical garments, with his crosier, the shields of his episcopal and paternal arms, and the rich tabernacle work which gleamed over his head. Bishop Neville was inthroned at Durham, on the 1 1th April, 1438. He " was the fourth of * Surtees, vol. iv. p. 151. 103 eight sons of Ralph, Earl of Westmoreland, by Joan of Lancaster, sister of Henry IV. By his maternal descent he was closely connected with all the branches of Plantagenet, and nearly allied in blood to the reigning sovereign ; and by the issue of his father's first bed he claimed alliance with all the ancient nobility and gentry of the north. Bishop Neville does not seem to have par ticipated in the haughty and ambitious spirit which distinguished the younger race of Neville. His character is unstained by violence or intrigue ; he sought for no increase of privileges or possessions at the expence of his vassals ; and the ample re venues which the Church already held flowed freely back through the country from which they were derived. Of the private habits of a life apparently passed in tranquility and retirement, nothing is recorded ; but it may be collected from the Rolls of the Episcopal Chancery that under Bishop Neville the Palatine Establishment was liberal and splen did. The great offices of his state and household were filled by his kindred the Nevilles, and by the Northern gentry, many of whom were honourably retained in his service, or bound to him by acts of individual generosity. To the heir of Emilden he freely returned the whole of his estates, which had escheated to the see in consequence of the forgery and collusion of his ancestor ; and he restored their ample possessions to the Grays of Northumber land, in the person of his nephew Sir Ralph Gray, representative of Sir Thomas Gray, who suffered for treason under Henry V. In the month of October, 1448, King Henry VI. visited the shrine of St. Cuthbert, and was entertained for several days by Bishop Neville in the Castle of Durham. In letters still extant the pious and humble sove reign expressed himself highly gratified by his 104 honourable reception, and by having witnessed the devout and magnificent service of the Northern Cathedrals."* Bishop Neville died on the 8th July, 1457. Advancing a pace or two eastwards, on the same side of the nave, we come to another altar-tomb, also sacred to a Neville. It commemorates the first layman whose bones were permitted to rest within the limits of the Cathedral. Ralph, Lord Neville, the victor of Neville's Cross, was the per son thus distinguished. As an acknowledgement of his gallant services in that battle this privilege of sepulture was in all probability accorded. His tomb is now bare of every ornament, if we except the bold projecting mouldings, which still remain to give character and expression, like the branches of a tree after its foliage has been scattered by the winds of autumn. Its enrichments were probably not very dissimilar to those of the monument of John, Lord Neville, which we have described, for there are evident indications of figures having been fas tened to its sides. Whatever its adornments, however, may have been, the hand of the spoiler has most effectually defaced them. The shapeless and broken fragments which rest on its upper slab were once the effigies of the Lord Neville and his wife Alice, daughter of Sir Hugh de Audley. Ralph, Lord Neville, died in 1367. He left a son John, Lord Neville, the " inheritor of the talents and activity of a father," who, " during a long and active life, appears as one of the most distinguished of the English Barons." Leaving these warlike barons to their repose, we cross to the opposite side of the Nave, where an altar-tomb of modern days presents itself to the view. It was erected by his pupils to the memory * Surtees, voL i., p. lvii. 105 of the Rev. James Britton, D. D., formerly Head Master of the Grammar School of Durham. The figure is in a half recumbent, meditative posture, clad in clerical robes, the drapery of which is well executed. There is great merit also in the chiselling of the head and face. It is to be regretted that there is so much poverty of effect in the tomb upon which the figure rests. The want of suffi cient projection in the mouldings of its basement and upper part occasions the statue to appear too large for its pedestal. A monument of this kind, recumbent on its altar-tomb, is so much of an ad vance in a right direction, as compared with the Pagan erections of two preceding centuries, that one feels loath to make a single depreciating ob servation : yet how far short is it of the full deve- lopement of the Christian idea of resting in sleep after the labours of life are ended, which is ex emplified in the calm and holy repose of the monumental effigies of the olden time. The only monument of modern days which we remember to have seen, at all to be compared in this respect, with the examples left us by the piety of past ages, is the very beautiful one, by Westmacott, in Westminster Abbey, to the memory of the Due de Montpensier. 106 If, however, it be admissible to represent the departed in any other attitude than that of " rest ing from their labours," none can be so appropriate or touching as that which has been chosen for the object of the memorial which arrests the eye, on turning into the southern transept. The kneeling figure of Bishop Barrington, from the admirable chisel of Chantry, must approve itself to the taste and feelings of every beholder, as well by the reverence and humility conveyed in the attitude, as by the striking and venerable expression of the countenance, which, in his case, was no unfaithful index of the mind within. Noble by birth, the honours of the Palatinate of Durham were carried by him with becoming dignity, un marked by pride or ostentation. Pious and cha ritable, its high duties were performed with exact ness and rectitude, and its princely revenues dispensed with unsparing hand yet just discrimi nation. Nor is it less to his praise that in the 107 disposal of the high preferments which are in the gift of a Bishop of Durham, the laborious parish priest, and the painful student were not unrewarded. After a life prolonged beyond the ordinary limits of human existence, Bishop Barrington descended to the grave, leaving behind him a name second to none of the many princely prelates who have oc cupied the episcopal chair of the see of Durham. Between two of the pillars of the North tran sept stands a monument, by Rickman, in the style of the decorated period of our Church architec ture, commemorating the Rev. John Qarr, M.A., who for twenty-two years presided over the Gram mar School of Durham, and who, but a few months before his death, had been appointed Professor of Mathematics in the then newly founded University of Durham. Tt was raised as a token of deep re spect and veneration by those who had had the benefit of his instruction. Never, certainly, were the relations of master and scholar characterized by more kindly feelings oh the part of both, than in the case of this learned and excellent man and those who were under his charge. His elegant and accurate scholarship, and profound mathema tical knowledge, necessarily commanded their re spect, while the sweetness of his disposition ob tained their almost filial affection. That he was not unskilled in the difficult art of imparting that knowledge, which, for his own fame, his modesty only too often concealed, the celebrity of many of his scholars sufficiently evinces. It may be per mitted to an old pupil thus to offer his tribute of grateful remembrance. Nearly adjoining Professor Carr's Monument, at the south end of the north transept aisle, is a large marble cenotaph, to the memory of Mr. Woodifield, late Receiver to the Dean and Chap- 108 ter. The idea is taken from the sepulchral me morials of classical antiquity. Respecting, as we must do, the filial piety which has raised so costly a tribute to a parent's memory, we may yet be allowed an expression of regret that the Genius loci should have been so little consulted in the se lection of a design. We must now proceed to the southern aisle of the Choir, where the stately tomb of Bishop Hat field claims our attention. Our readers will remem ber the description of the canopy over it, which forms the Episcopal throne, (see p. 50.) The altar- tomb and effigy, as we remarked, is unseen from the choir. The sides and arch of the canopy which are seen from this southern aisle, are decorated in precisely the same manner, and with equal rich ness, as those which face the choir. The tomb is lofty. Above the basement mouldings is a range of square compartments, each of which contains a quatrefoil enclosing a shield. Above is a corres ponding number of tall shallow niches, of which small projecting buttresses, whose upper stages are surmounted by crocketed pinnacles, form the divisions. The heads of the niches are ogee- shaped with crockets on the outer moulding, and richly cuspated within, terminating in delicately chiselled finials, the neck-mouldings of which are continued horizontally and form the lowest of the cornice mouldings of the tomb. Below this, shields are inserted at intervals between the heads of the niches and the pinnacles of the small but tresses. They also form part of the ornaments in the concavity of the cornice moulding. The stone work of the interior of the niches is partially dia pered, in very slight relief. On this elevated tomb is laid the effigy of the prelate, recumbent, with hands uplifted, in that still and calm attitude, 109 which, in our judgement, is so singularly affecting to the mind. The figure is of white marble, and the minutest ornaments and embroidery of the episcopal attire are carved with a delicacy of chisel which is well worthy of examination. The jewel led mitre, the ample folds of the chasuble, with its richly worked border, the embroidered stole and maniple, and the alb, wrought with the lions of England and the Bishop's own paternal coat, are all sculptured with infinite skill. The effect was, doubtless, originally heightened by the addi tion of gold and colours. Bishop Hatfield was enthroned on Christmas Day, 1345. He " was .descended from an honourable family, being the second son of Sir Walter Hatfield, of Hatfield in Holdernesse. He was educated amongst the se cular clergy, but his orders, less strict than the monastic rule, had not prevented his bearing arms in France ; and the year after his consecration he appeared at the siege of Calais with eighty archers. To this martial propensity, rather than to any de ficiency in scholastic learning, or in regular orders, some insinuations as to his clerical incapacity may probably be attributed. At the time of his pro motion, Hatfield, besides some ecclesiastical pre ferment, was tutor to Edward, Prince of Wales ; and his spirit, sense, and loyalty, recommended him to his sovereign as a fit depositary of the ex traordinary powers which encircled the northern mitre."* The principal event which took place during Hatfield's pontificate was the battle of Neville's Cross, and the Prince Bishop of Durham, according to Froissart, was one of those who led the van at that famous engagement. " After this victory," continues Surtees, " he ruled the Church and the Palatinate in profound tranquillity thirty-six * Surtees, vol. i., p. xlviii. 110 years, appearing only once as a Commissioner on the Scottish border, and engaging in no political intrigue. The See of Durham lost nothing of its dignity under his firm and vigorous administration. Like his predecessor Bury he maintained a princely hospitality, and dispensed a daily and extended charity ; he was open, generous, and sincere ; to his subjects just and beneficent; to his dependents liberal and indulgent ; yet, when opposed, haughty and untractable, impatient of controul, tenacious of rank, and jealous to excess of any infringement on the privileges of the Church. Chambre de scribes him tall and unbending under the load of years, grey-headed, of venerable aspect, and lofty and commanding presence. Bishop Hatfield thoroughly repaired the Castle of Durham; he added a strong tower to its former lines of defence, and rebuilt the Bishop's Hall and the Constable's Hall. He placed all the other residences belong ing to the See in repair, and built Durham Place in the Strand, (the site of which is now occupied by the buildings of the Adelphi.) He became the second founder of Durham House in Oxford, and was a liberal benefactor to the Carmelite Friars of North-Allerton. Bishop Hatfield died, after a long illness, at his manor of Alford near London, on the 8th May, being the vigil of St. John of Beverley, 1381. His body attended by the Bishop of Hereford and a numerous train was brought to Durham, and interred in the tomb which he had prepared during his life." Close by the foot of Hatfield's tomb is a flat marble slab whose fragmentary inscription, .... passez pvr lame speaks of days gone by. It rescues from forgetfulness the name of Emeric de Lumley, Prior of Lythum, and afterwards of Finchale, dependent cells upon the great monas tery of Durham. Ill Pass we onwards into the Chapel of the Nine Altars. The tomb of St. Cuthbert has already sufficiently engaged our attention, when surveying the place where his stately shrine was reared. When looking towards the north end of the Cha pel, the eye of the spectator is immediately attracted by a colossal statue of white marble, but before pausing to examine it, we must request our readers first of all to contemplate the humble slab which covers the remains of that powerful prelate, who secured for himself the privilege, never before granted, of being buried near the body of St. Cuth bert, and whose name is still proverbial as a sort of impersonation of Episcopal dignity and gran deur at its most splendid epoch. Anthony Bee, Bishop of Durham and Patriarch of Jerusalem, lies under a slab of blue marble which forms part of the pavement opposite to the spot once occu pied by the altar of St. Aidan and St. Helena. The piety of Lord Willoughby d'Eresby, renewed, a few years ago, upon a small plate of the same material, the inscription which was formerly en graven on a brass which surrounded the ledge of the marble : — $w aul ntagnsnimuB antontttg f>it facet fonts Jerusalem stwmtus |Jatria«f)a ftttt, qttoD opimns &nnis btom's tegnabat aex et f plettta JWille imentenfs ffl»v(sto motttut guoque tenia. Bishop Bee was enthroned on Christmas Eve, ] 285. He was the son of Walter Bee, Baron of Eresby in Lincolnshire. After presiding over the See of Durham for twenty-eight years, he died at Eltham on the 3rd of March, 1310. "The Pala tine power reached its highest elevation under the splendid Pontificate of Anthony Bee. Surrounded by his officers of state, or marching at the head of 112 his troops, in peace or in war, he appeared as the military chief of a powerful and independent Franchise. The Court of Durham exhibited all the appendages of Royalty ; nobles addressed the Palatine Sovereign kneeling, and instead of menial servants, knights waited in his presence-chamber, and at his table, bareheaded and standing. Impa tient of controul, whilst he asserted an oppressive superiority over the Convent, and trampled on the rights of his vassals, he jealously guarded his own Palatine Franchise, and resisted the encroach ments of the Crown when they trenched on the privileges of the Aristocracy. When his pride or his patriotism had provoked the displeasure of his sovereign, he met the storm with firmness, and had the fortune or the address to emerge from disgrace and difficulty with added rank and influ ence. His high birth gave him a natural claim to power, and he possessed every popular and splen did quality which could command obedience or excite admiration. His courage and constancy were shewn in the service of his Sovereign. His liberality knew no bounds; and he regarded no expense, however enormous, when placed in com petition with any object of pleasure or magnificence. Yet in the midst of apparent profusion he was too prudent ever to feel the embarrassment of want. Surrounded by habitual luxury, his personal tem perance was as strict as it was singular : and his chastity was exemplary in an age of general cor ruption. Not less an enemy to sloth than to in temperance, his leisure was devoted either to splendid progresses from one manor to another, or to the sports of the field ; and his activity and temperance preserved his faculties of mind and body vigorous under the approach of age and in firmity. In the munificence of his public works 113 he rivalled the greatest of his predecessors. Within the Bishopric of Durham he founded the Colleges of Chester and Lanchester, erected towers at Gainford and Coniscliff, and added to the buildings of Alnwick and Barnard Castles. He gave Even- wood Manor to the Convent, and appropriated the Vicarage of Morpeth to the Chapel which he had founded at Auckland. In his native county of Lincoln he endowed Alvingham Priory, and built a Castle at Somerton. In Kent he erected the beautiful Manor House of Eltham, whose ruins still speak the taste and magnificence of its founder. Notwithstanding the vast expenses incurred in these and other works, in his contests with the Crown and with his vassals, in his foreign journeys, and in the continued and excessive charges of his household, he died wealthier than any of his pre decessors, leaving immense treasures in the riches of the age ; gallant horses, costly robes, rich fur niture, plate and jewels."* Hard by the lowly tomb of this princely pre late, stands the monument of the last of his suc cessors in whom were centered those Palatine powers, which in the person of Bee were extended to their utmost limit. When the Palatine sceptre was swayed for the last time by a Bishop of Dur ham, the progress of five centuries had wrought a change, such as Bee, assuredly, little dreamed of. The once fierce and active enmity of our Scottish neighbours no longer needed the vigorous arm of a martial bishop to repel their intrusion, for na tional hostility had long given place to kindly intercourse and mutual confidence; and a long period of internal peace and tranquillity, together with innumerable social changes, appeared to ren der less necessary the continuance of any of those * Surtees, vol I. p. xxxv. 114 peculiar jurisdictions, which in the more remote corners of the kingdom, especially, and in the dis turbed periods of our history, were of singular use and benefit, both with respect to the adminis tration of justice, and the regulation of various other matters of a more domestic nature which came under their cognizance. It were idle now to enquire whether any adequate advantage has been gained by depriving the Bishops of Durham of the venerable appendage which for so many centuries added dignity to their mitre. Bishop Van Mildert's fame rests, however, upon a surer ground than that of being handed down as the last wearer of the coronet of the Counts Palatine. He has higher and more lasting claims to the ve neration of posterity. As a scholar he was a ripe and good one, and as a theologian, a true son of the Church of England, and a sound and able exponent of those distinctive principles, based on primitive antiquity, whereon she takes her stand, alike against the errors of Rome and Geneva. His generosity was unbounded, and was especially displayed in the munificent aid which he rendered on the establish ment of the University of Durham by the Dean and Chapter, and also in the plans which he had projected for the increase of all the smaller livings in his diocese : plans which were in course of opera tion when it pleased Providence to remove him from the scene of his labours. These acts of his charity were public and known, but his private benefactions are believed to have been upon a scale of beneficence even yet more extended. Certain it is that he acted as the steward only of the large possessions of his See, for it was manifest at his death that to realize a fortune out of the revenues of the Church had never formed one of his aspira tions. 115 Bishop Van Mildert's monument was erected by public subscription. It is a sitting figure, of large dimensions, from the studio of Gibson, and presents no unfaithful representation of the mild and thoughtful countenance of that revered pre late. The arches of that part of the arcade which de corates the lower portion of the eastern wall of the Nine Altars, are for the most part filled up with mural tablets, with but little advantage, it must be confessed to its architectural effect. They chiefly commemorate some of the members of the Chapter and their families, but have little claim to admiration for any peculiar character or beauty, if we except one, a bas-relief of chaste and elegant design, to the memory of the infant daughter of Viscount Chelsea. While upon the subject of the sepulchral me morials within the Cathedral, we may fitly men tion those which are worthy of notice in the grave- 116 yard outside. The cemetery or centry-garth, as it is still corruptly called, which was the burying place of the monks, was at the east end of the Church and extended itself also towards the Chap ter House on the south side of the Choir. It was not however for their own exclusive sepulture. " Divers gentlemen of good worship," we learn, much affected burial beside the good fathers of the monastery, that they might be " nigh unto that holy man St. Cuthbert," but as the author we have so often quoted somewhat touchingly tells us, " their memories are now perished, and all their monuments defaced and gone."* Dean Whittingham appears to have had a chief hand in the destruction, especially, of those which covered the remains of priors or monks, and had any "imagery- work, or chalice wrought on and engraven upon them." So far indeed did his iconoclastic spirit carry him that he is recorded to have broken up the stones aud applied them to the building of a wash-house. It is not improbable that his hand of spoliation may have also extended in some de gree to the north side of the Cathedral, the place of the existing cemetery, for there are but few re mains of any antiquity to be pointed out. A female effigy, in Stanhope marble, near the great north door, is the most perfect and interesting. Popular tradition long told a stirring tale concern ing this figure. It was said to represent one, who inspired by the lust of gain, dared a fearful leap from the top of the northern aisle. He alighted in safety and received the purse of gold which had tempted him to risk both life and limb. The same glittering temptation induced a second at tempt, in which he perished ; and he was said to have been buried on the spot where he fell and * Rites and Monuments- 117 represented in effigy with the wages of his folly in his hand. In confirmation of the truth of the legend appeal was always made to the figure in question and to the purse which it manifestly held in its hand. And a purse for long it was most piously believed to be, till the legend was ruthlessly demolished by Mr. Raine adducing many very satisfactory arguments to prove that it is the monu mental effigy of the Lady Eleanor, daughter of John, Lord Neville of Raby, and wife of Sir Ralph Lumley, whose hand is grasping not a purse, but a ghve.* A knightly effigy, sorely mutilated and broken, with an oblong shield, lies not far off, and when we have mentioned a few coffin lids with crosses upon each, foliated in different but not un usual forms, there remains no memorial of sufficient importance to demand a separate notice, except that of Mickleton, the laborious local antiquary, whose voluminous manuscript collections eventually fell into the hands of Bishop Barrington, who placed them in Cosin's Library. He died at Crook Hall, in 1693. We perhaps ought also to mention that of Dodsley, the author of the Economy of Human Life, who is buried under an altar tomb in this cemetery. His epitaph was written by Spence, the author of the Polymetis, at whose prebendal house he died in 1764. * Brief Account of Durham Cathedral, p. 12S. 118 THE CLOISTER. We now leave the Cathedral, by one of its south ern doors, and pass into the Cloister, a large quadrangular space, around which is a covered walk. The long ranges of its windows with their open tracery were restored about sixty years ago, after the Gothic fashion of that day, and although nothing can be worse, taken singly, than the way in which the restoration was done, there are yet few things more pleasing than the general effect of the whole. The lengthening perspective of its alleys as we successively turn each corner, the light streaming through the open tracery of the windows, with its alternate effects of sunshine and shadow falling on the walls and pavement, the pannelled roof over-head, with its " scocheons" of varied device and hue, and the smooth green turf of the square within, with the marble basin in its centre, form a combination which in the unbroken stillness of a summer's noon, or the holy calm of evening, renders it no unmeet place as a haunt for retired musing. The building of the Cloister was commenced about the year 1368, was carried on by Bishop Skirlaw, whose executors presented £400. towards its completion, and was eventually finished by Cardinal Langley, about 1419. The north alley of the Cloister was originally occupied by a range of wainscotted closets, or " carrels," as they are called by the author of the Rites and Monuments. Each window lighted three of these closets, the divisions of which were carried close up to the mullions of the window, so that their respective occupants were quite separated one from the other. 119 All the carrels were furnished with desks, and were respectively assigned, as places of study, to the senior monks, who resorted thither for that pur pose between dinner time and even-song. Between the carrels and the wall of the Church was a long enclosed space, into which they all opened. This was the library of the convent, to which all had access, and was fitted up with almries, or closets of wood-work, in which their books were deposited. Some indications may yet be traced on the wall of the almries having been fastened against it. The catalogues of the Monastic Library of Durham from antient MSS. were published by the Sur tees Society in 1838, and are exceedingly inter esting as affording accurate data, by means of which we may come to a conclusion respecting the nature of their studies and the extent of their learning. The Norman portal which opens into the Church at the east end of this alley, is peculiarly rich in its decoration. It consists of a succession of re ceding concentric arches, whose soffits and faces are respectively enriched with beaded, twisted panel, embattled and rose mouldings. The inner most arch is sculptured with the diamond frette moulding which is continued down the sides of the doorway to the ground. The other arches rest upon disengaged nook-shafts with sculptured capi tals. In the western alley of the Cloister is the Treasury of the Church, which is entered by a small pointed doorway, near to the large round headed door at its north west angle which gives access to the Dormitory above. Tt remains in pre cisely the same state as before the dissolution. There is the iron grating behind which Master Treasurer sat to receive the rents and payments made to the House; and several huge chests, each secured by more than one lock, and strongly 120 clamped with iron, testify to the value of the store which they once contained. The valuable records of the monastery, papal bulls, royal and episcopal charters, dating from the most remote antiquity, are still preserved here with the utmost care. There are also quantities of charters belonging to many of the more important families of the Bis hopric, Lumleys, Eures, Conyers, Hiltons, Urn- frevilles, Claxtons, and the like, which were doubt less originally deposited in the Treasury of the Prior and Convent for safer keeping than the Castle or the Manor- House could always afford. Mr. Surtees has given in his History a series of engravings taken from the original impressions affixed to the Charters here preserved, of the Episcopal seals, and also many specimens, some of exquisite design and character, of the seals which are appended to the charters of the great barons and chief gentry of the North. Among the archives here reposited, are also the rolls of expenses of the Convent, and of the dependent cells of Finchale, Coldingham, Stamford, Lythum, &c, duplicates of which were sent every year to the great monastery of Durham, that like a wise and careful parent, she might exercise a due super vision over the outgoings and incomings of her chil dren. These rolls are of great value, as throwing light upon the domestic menage of monastic life, and containing much curious information as to prices of provisions, &c, besides often giving inci dental information respecting historical and other matters of general interest. The Surtees Society has published the Rolls of Finchale and Colding ham, as well as the Account Rolls of the Bursar of the Priory of Durham from 1530 to 1534. Close to the door of the Treasury was a seat for the Master of the Novices, who sat opposite to 121 him, near the windows of the Cloister, in an en closed space separated from the other part of. the alley by wainscot-work, like the " carrels" of the monks on the north side of the Cloister. Here they received regular instruction, forenoon and afternoon. This alley also contains the song-school, and vestries for the minor canons and choristers, which, as well as the Treasury, look into the garden be longing to the fifth stall, formerly the monks' bowling green. The school and vestries are all part of a large vaulted hall which formerly occupied all the space from the Treasury to the south-wes tern corner of the Cloister, where its original door way is still in use. This was the Common-House of the monks, where they had freedom of conver sation with each other, and was the only apartment in the monastery (except those of the Prior and great officers of the House) where the indulgence of a fire was permitted. This is the place, as we have already remarked, where some curious frag ments of antient art have been deposited, which previously found a resting place within the Shrine of St. Cuthbert. It is a dark and gloomy looking apartment, now, whatever it may have been, and scarcely looks like a place for holding high festival, yet it was the scene of " a solemn banquet" once, at least, in the year : when the Master of the House kept his 0 Sapiential and entertained his brethren with deep flagons of foaming ale, cakes, figs, and raisins. Over the Common House and the Treasury is the Dormitory. Its length has been curtailed by successive additions which it has furnished to the * The day of this feast, Dec. 16, is still designated in our Calendar by this name. It is so called from the beginning of an anthem in the Romish service, which was sung in honour of our Lord's Advent from that day till .Christmas Eve. M 122 house belonging to the fifth stall. It originally ex tended the whole length of that side of the Clois ter, and bears date about 1404. Its exterior has been subjected to restoration, but with due atten tion to preserve the character of its perpendicular windows. In the interior the cells of the monks were ranged along the walls on each side. The privacy of each was secured by the allotment of a separate chamber closely wainscotted, whose sole furniture was a bed and a book-desk. From the south western angle of the Cloister a magnificent view is obtained of the great tower of the Cathedral. From this point two sides of the tower are commanded, and it rises with a sort of pyramidical grandeur from the midst of its tributary aisles and transepts. The many windowed line of the Cloister beneath, the time-worn and moulder ing walls of the southern aisle of the Church, the great perpendicular window of the Chapter-House, and the bright hue of the newly restored gable of the south transept with its Norman decorations, all bear their part in a picture, from which many a lover of the beautiful will be loath to withdraw his eye. The character of the windows of the southern aisle has already been adverted to (p. 30-1) : we need not therefore now describe them. The general appearance of this part of the fabric will give a sufficient idea of that which the nor thern front presented, before it was subjected to the paring process. Architectural restoration is fortunately better understood now. The Norman windows of the triforium and clerestory, here, as well as on the north, have received mullions and tracery of a subsequent date. The observer may readily here perceive the indications of each win dow of the triforium of this aisle having been under 123 its separate gable. Several small windows, little larger than loop-holes, have been inserted in the triforium, without any very obvious purpose. The windows of that side of the transept facing the Cloister, have all been restored strictly in accor dance with their original Norman character. The south alley of the Cloister was originally occupied by the Frater-house, or Refectory of the Monastery, built upon a Norman crypt, which is still in existence. This apartment, which appears to have been one of very stately character, adorned with fresco painting, and carved wainscotting, was used as the dining hall of the Convent on days of high festival, when their hospitality was dispensed to a large number of guests. At other times they made use of one of smaller dimensions, at the west end of the Refectory, called the loft, still in existence and now used as the dining room of the prebendal house attached to the fifth stall. Both communicated with the great kitchen of the Monastery, now the Deanery Kitchen. The minor-canons, who appear for some time after their foundation to have lived for the most part a collegiate life, used the Refectory as a com mon hall. During the time of the civil wars, however, it seems to have fallen into decay, and in all probability after the Restoration the changes in the times and in social habits, rendered living in community not so much in favour with them. However this may be, no attempt was made to re- edify their hall for its original purpose, but under the auspices, and at the expense, of Dean Sudbury, the Chapter Library (as it is usually called) arose upon its ruins. We shall request our readers to enter it with us after we have completed our sur vey of the Cloister. Passing along this southern walk of the Cloister 124 we are brought to the extremity of its eastern alley. The windows of this walk are recorded to have been filled with stained glass, representing the life and miracles of St. Cuthbert. On this side of the Cloister, no longer ago than the year 1799, stood the antient Norman Chapter House, built by Bishop Galfrid Rufus (1 133-1 143.) Me lancholy to relate, the desire of possessing a com fortable room for the transaction of Chapter busi ness had more weight in those days than all the veneration due to antiquity or the sanctities of a place which was hallowed by the sepulchral me morials of prelates and priors of Durham for three centuries after the conquest. These have all pe rished. Nothing indeed remains to shew its former character except a portion of the arcade which surrounded the lower part of the interior, and its rich Norman doorway, which have been brought to light by stripping off the stoothing with which they were enveloped. The doorway which now gives access to the Chapter room is not the original entrance. The great portal of the Chapter-house, now closed up is a little nearer to the Cloister entrance. The mouldings of its arch have suffered under the chiselling and paring process which was so much in favour some sixty years ago. The windows on each side, which were ori ginally open to the Cloister and unglazed (we believe for some symbolical reason) are now walled up. They are of the same date as the doorway, indeed the only additions to its original Norman character appear to have been the perpendicular window which still exists over the great entrance, and some decorated tracery in its eastern windows. Between the Chapter House and the Church is a room, which in days of old was called the Par lour : and was a place where merchants were 125 allowed to produce their goods for the inspection of the Bursar and other officers who made pro vision for the House, and where the monks had licence of speech with their kinsfolk and friends. Above is the office of the Registrar of the Dean and Chapter. This was formerly used as a Library, having been built for that purpose by Prior Wes- syngton in 1414, to which it continued to be ap plied until the building of the present one by Dean Sudbury. Wessyngton's perpendicular window has recently been restored. The door near the entrance to the Cloister forms a private access to the Deanery. The roof of the Cloister is of oak, panelled in squares, divided by ribs with bosses at their intersections, most of which have a shield in their centre. The bearings of Bishop Skirlaw, argent, six wands in true love, proper, occur at frequent intervals, and amongst the others may be noted the well known ensigns of many of the old houses of the North : — Percy, Clifford, Umfreville, Greystock, Scroop, Neville, Bowes, Tempest, Surtees and others. One or two figures of angels remain in the corners of the roof, supporting shields with the arms of Skirlaw. The large basin in the centre of the Cloister quadrangle, is of Teesdale marble, the blocks of which were procured for the purpose by permission of the Abbot of Eggleston. It is octagonal, and has shields carved on the sides. It once flowed with a plentiful supply of pure and sparkling water, for the ablutions of the monks. We learn from the Rites and Monuments that it was enclosed within a building of stone, lighted by seven windows, above which was " a dove-coat, covered with lead. The workmanship was both fine and costly." There was also attached to it " a bell, to call the monks at eleven o'clock, to come and wash before dinner." 126 THE LIBRARY. " What a happiness is it that, without all offence of Necromancy, I may here call up any of the antient worthies of Learning, whether humane or divine, and confer with them of all my doubts ! That I can at plea sure summon whole synods of Reverend Fathers and acute Doctors from all the Coasts of the Earth, to give their well studied judgments in all points of question which I propose ! Neither can I cast my eye casually upon any of these silent masters, but I must learn somewhat. It is a wantonness to complain of choice." Bishop Hall. The Library of the Cathedral, which owes its foundation in its present form, as we have already stated, to Dean Sudbury, is a long and lofty room, entered from the southern alley of the Cloister, by a door of debased or semi-classic detail. It is well lighted by a range of tall mullioned windows on each side. The room is wainscotted with oak, up to the level of the window sills, and cases for the books of the same material and of like height, are uniformly arranged against the walls, project ing into the room from each side, and forming a regular series of recesses, with desk and seats be tween each case. It is of course far beyond our limits even to attempt any thing like a conspectus of the books contained here, which amount to about 8000 volumes. It is sufficient to state in general terms that it is a Library not unworthy of the body to whom it belongs, and from whose munificence its stores are continually increasing. We should not omit to mention the liberality with which the use of its valuable contents is permitted to any resident in the city whose character and position afford a war rant for the security of the loan. For the infor mation of strangers we may here observe that the Library is open between the hours of twelve and one, every Tuesday and Saturday. The Rev. 127 James Raine is the present Librarian. His name is so well known to all who are conversant with archaeological learning as to render any further mention of it unnecessary from our pen. The manuscripts are kept with great care in two closets on each side of the lower end of the Library. In that on the left hand are deposited the precious stores, which, for the most part, have descended from the Prior and Convent to their present suc cessors. Amongst these are many splendid speci mens of caligraphy, and the pages of many of them are resplendent with the bright colours and gilding which the monastic scribes of old so well knew how to apply to the embellishment of their service- books and copies of Holy Scripture. Pudsay's bible, in four large volumes, is a magnificent ex ample. Nothing can exceed the beauty of the decorated initial letters, many of which are exceed. ingly curious, on account of the several characters which are portrayed, being all attired by the lim ner in the garments worn at the time when the illuminations were painted. Guards of fine linen of coeval fabric are attached to some of the leaves, to protect the painting from injury. For quaint device as well as beauty of execution, we may in stance the volume lettered A n. 3 : It is a copy of part of the Psalter, with Augustine's commentary. There is also a Bible in one thick volume, which possesses illuminations in almost every page, of singular minuteness and delicacy of pencilling. Among the oldest MSS. are a copy of the Gospels of SS. John, Luke, and Mark, which is said by Bentley to have been certainly written before the year 700 ; a Cassiodorus super Psalterium, (B. n. 30.) traditionally said to have been written by Venerable Beda, which contains a very curious illumination of David playing upon the harp, with 128 a most elaborate border; and an Anglo-Saxon Ritual, which has recently been given to the world by the Surtees Society. The latter contains some interesting indications of the manner in which re ligion was made to blend itself with almost every action of the life of our Saxon fathers. The trees of their orchards had a blessing invoked upon them when planted, and thanks were rendered on the gathering of the fruit which they yielded. In like manner the nets of the hunter, the fisher, and the fowler, and the bread which was eaten in the household, were all hallowed for their several uses by the voice of prayer. It contains also a curious form of exorcism of vases found among the ruins of Roman cities and encampments, a treasure trove which in those days must have been by no means uncommon. The fragments of the robes of >St. Cuthbert, and the other relics which we mentioned above (p. 68) are kept in this closet, within a glass case. The closet on the opposite side is also appro priated to the reception of MSS. which chiefly consist of the voluminous collections of Dr. Hun ter, Randall, and Allan, towards the illustration of the history of the county. It also contains a large collection of music, the legacy of a former preben dary, and the coins collected by Sir George Wheler in his travels in the east. The Roman altars and tablets ranged around the room are principally from the great stations of Lanchester, Ebchester, and Corbridge, in the vi cinity of which even now are often found similar remains. A thin gold plate, with an inscription, found at Lanchester, is preserved in the MSS. closet we have just mentioned. At the east end of the room is a full length por trait of Dean Sudbury, the founder, and hanging 129 against the panels of the wainscotting beneath are portraits of Bishops Chandler and Butler, be tween which is a small and very ill-favoured " portraicture" of Queen Marie. A door in the wainscotting forms a private entrance to the Dea nery. At the western extremity of the Library are two other portraits ; one of Dr. Cowper, Dean of Durham from 1746 to 1774 : the other repre senting Sir George Wheler, clad in surplice and hood, with mild and venerable countenance, and white hair hanging down upon his shoulders. In a closet, with glass doors, which faces the entrance, are preserved the copes belonging to the Church. They were used in the Cathedral of Durham, in accordance with the xxiv Canon, at the administration of the Holy Communion, within the last seventy years. Bishop Warburton, who held a prebendal stall here until his death in 1779. was the first who laid them aside. His temper, which was none of the best, was wont to get un commonly ruffled by the high collar of the cope getting between his neck and his full-bottomed wig. At last, in a fit of more than ordinary irritation, he threw aside the cope, and vowed he would never wear it again. After this, they were gra dually laid aside by the other prebendaries and at last fell into total desuetude. They are very curi ous specimens of the loom and the needle of for mer days, some of them, in all probability, having been in existence two centuries before the dissolu tion. The one of crimson silk, on which is worked David holding the head of Goliath, was presented to the Church by Charles I. 130 THE DEANERY, &C A passage, entered by a low archway, leads from the Cloister to the College, or Cathedral close, a large open space, around which are disposed the prebendal houses belonging to the several stalls. Nearly a fourth of this square is occupied by the garden of the Deanery, projecting into it in front of that building, which is on the left hand as we emerge from the Cloister passage. The Deanery was originally the lodging of the Lord Prior, and still retains some of the architectural features be longing to the time of its earlier occupants, espe cially an early English crypt, under what was the Prior's domestic chapel, but much alteration has been made in later times in the arrangement and disposition of the rooms, fitting them to the habits of modern days. A beautiful old panelled roof of carved oak remains in one of the bed rooms. The receiving rooms are large and lofty, They were fitted up in their present form by Dean Hall. The garden of the Deanery extends behind over what was originally a portion of the Cemetery. This enlargement of its borders was made by Dean Whittingham, who certainly never allowed any feelings of reverence for sacred things or sacred places to stand in the way of his proceedings. A line of magnificent hollies extend their branches far over the southern wall. Before we leave the Deanery, it may interest some of our readers to have an account of a few hours spent there in 1634 by the Captain of the Norwich Company, with his Lieutenant and Ancient, from whose quaint and amusing note-book we have already quoted.* They • See p. 26. 131 had attended morning prayer at the Cathedral, where they " were discover'd by that worthy, grave, generous Deane (Dr. Hunt) and no sooner was prayers done" the narrator continues, " but wee were summoned by one of his gentile Ambassadors, to take part of a Resident Dinner wth him, wch had we not freely and cheerfully accepted off, wee had lost our selves, & that noble entertainment, such as was fit for neat palated courtiers, & not for such dusty travelling Soldiers as wee were. The first salute & welcome from this worthy Gentle man was exprest with a double reflect upon us ; first, as we were strangers, but more especially as we were his Countrymen. It pleas'd him to leave all his Guests, Doctors, Prebends, and Citizens of both Sexes, & of both kinds spirituall and layitie, & to condiscend to walke wth us in his Garden about half an houre, till his Gent Usher, the har binger of Dinner, came & told him his meat was on the table : we wish'd the Cooke had not been so hasty, or that he had layen longer in bed : for his grave discourse was so mild, sweet, & eloquent, as would make a man soe in a trance, as never to be weary of hearing him. The same curteous usuage wee had in his Garden, the same wee had at his Board, which neither wanted good Dishes nor Company, for there were of both choice, and plenty. After halfe an houres sitting there came a young Scholler, & read a Chapter, during wch time all discourse ceas'd : no sooner was itt ended, but the grave Master of the House begins a Cup of Wine to all his Guests, wth a hearty welcome, wch his gentile Servitors were careful to see every man pledge, to wash down the fat Venison, sweet Salmon, & other great cheere this large and sump tuous Table was furnished with. Thus we spent an houre to refresh our travelling Corps, w,h as 132 good meat and drinke, & from as good, as free, & as generous a Gentleman as England affords. Soone after Dinner wee bethought our selves of our Journey, and so agreed to take our leave of him, but his reply to our requests was to stay still wth him a weeke longer ; our cheare and welcome should be the same we had found : we mildly press'd for his licence to depart, telling him how we had resolv'd and order'd our Journey. A noble Doctor standing by (in our behalfes wee thanke him) told Mr. Deane that the greatest freedom Strangers could have was to enjoy their Liberties : well, said this grave Orator, since I can no longer enjoy you, I shall wish & pray for a happy & pros perous Journey to attend you, and soe I commit you into the hands of my Jalor, his Gentleman Usher, one of our Countrymen standing by." And so they took leave of their hospitable host. Time produces its changes in manners and forms of social courtesy, but allowing for these mutations, a " Residence Dinner" within the precincts of the College still presents an appearance very similar in many respects to that which it did two hundred years ago. The host still presides in his canonical habit of cassock and gown, and the " young schol ler" still comes in at a certain time to read a por tion of the Psalter, after which the Residentiary addresses him with, Tu autem; to which he re sponds, Domine miserere nostri : a remnant of the old office of the Benedictio mensm in which it cccurs. The " Poculum charitatis, or Love-cup," as Sir George Wheler calls it,* then makes its round. It seems trifling perhaps to record these things, but it may be that in the course of a few years, even these faint relics of the customs of our fathers may be known only by tradition. » Protestant Monastery, p. 175. 133 The Deanery kitchen, formerly the great kitchen of the monastery, is well worthy of a visit from any one curious in architectural remains. It is a large octagonal building and bears date 1368-1370, and in the great features of its unique and curious groining, is as perfect as the day it was finished. The groining " consists of eight semicircular ribs, each extending over three sides of the octagon, the space left within their intersection being con verted into a lantern.* If the yawning arch of its huge fire-place were opened out, and the apparatus for modern cookery removed, we should see the monastic kitchen in its pristine state. Its plain and massive exterior, groups not unpleasingly with the long line of the Library, with its range of tall windows, and the great pile of the Cathedral be hind it. The prebendal houses in this square, are all of them of more or less modern date, and present no external features of interest. They occupy the place of buildings devoted to various purposes of use and hospitality, in the days of monastic splen dour. Along the west side was a noble Guest- hall, as it was termed, with its suite of apartments for the due reception of travellers of every degree, who were entertained, according to their quality, by their kind hosts, as long as their occasions led them to stay in Durham, and no questions asked, " so long as they continued of honest and good be haviour." In the north-west angle of the square was the Monk's Infirmary, and in the vaults below a prison for the punishment of flagitious offenders. The south side was taken up with garners and store -houses, malt-kiln and orchards, of all which no trace remains, excepting perhaps some crypts and cellars under one or two of the prebendal » Billings's Architectural Illustrations of Durham Cathedral, p. 50. N 134 houses which occupy their site. Two or three aged and branching sycamores, and a stone reser voir for water, half covered with ivy, which stands near the south-west angle of the square, are in harmony with its quiet precincts. A noble view of the south side of the Cathedral, with its subjacent buildings, is obtained when standing by this reser voir. The great Gateway which still gives access from the town to the Abbey precincts is a perfect and interesting specimen of a class of buildings upon which much care was generally bestowed. It is of the perpendicular period, having been built by Prior Castell, at the latter part of the 15th cen- 135 tury, but of plainer and more unadorned character than many which are met with of that date. The groining of the arch-way is good, and its bosses sculptured with foliage, of which Prior Castell's shield of arms forms an adornment. The window above the arch facing the street retains its original character, and has a canopied niche on each side, in one of which a headless figure still remains. The other is untenanted. The corresponding win dow on the western side of the gateway also remains unaltered. The small pointed windows on each side of it are of modern insertion. The upper chambers of the gateway are now used as the offices of the Receiver and Treasurer of the Dean and Chapter. They occupy the place of the Chapel of St. Helen and the lodging of its priest, who sang mass there every day for the benefit of the laity. By the street into which this gateway gives en trance we might now conduct our readers to the Castle, of which, indeed, as its name implies, it once formed one of the exterior defences. The Bailey has of course been the line of the origi nal Ballium of the Castle. We may take, how ever, another path, which opens out a sight of those beauties of wood and water for which Dur ham is so deservedly famed. Nearly facing the great Gateway, on the western side of the College square, is a low archway, beneath one of the pre bendal houses. To this we would beg the stranger to direct his steps, and when he has traversed its passage, let him linger awhile to enjoy the scene. The river gleaming through the trees beneath his feet, and the sound of its rushing waters, the op posite bank with its steep declivity, clothed to its summit with rich masses of wood, from which the houses of South Street appear to emerge and then follow the line of its ridge, the cottage by the mill- 136 dam, and the sloping gardens of the houses above, — all form a picture from which no lover of the fair scenes of nature can withhold his admiration. He may then descend the bank for a few paces ; and instead of proceeding downwards towards the river, let him turn to the right and pursue the path which will lead him beneath the huge but tresses and massy walls which once supported the the various monastic buildings which stood at the north western angle of the square we have just left. A little further on, in a straight line with these piles of masonry, and indeed forming a con tinuation of them, he will stand below the western wall of the Galilee Chapel, with its vast buttresses, rising from the rock, portions of which jut out from the side of the bank. We may here point out the remains of the original Norman work of the fabric, string work, and arcades with interlac ing arches, the perishable stone of whose mould ings is sorely injured by the blasts of centuries. After advancing onwards a few more paces, the path divides : one branch diverging to the right, the other pursuing a downward course towards the brink of the river, at the point where it is crossed by the old bridge of Framwellgate, which we have already mentioned.* The former, however, is the way by which we would lead our traveller. It brings us out again upon the Place-Green, f and in sight of the donjon keep of the Castle, rising proudly from its grassy mound and circling terraces. To the Castle, then, let us now direct our attention. * See p. 10. t See p. 11. 137 Sfije (Eaatle. The great keep of the Castle, pre-eminent on our right hand as we approach the exterior gateway, reminds us of a time when even the sanctity of the ecclesiastical character, required oftentimes that other than spiritual weapons should be raised in its defence. At a period when security was a pri mary consideration, the Bishops of Durham for the most part resided within this fortress, (which at no time yielded to the Scottish invaders) and their other strong-hold of Bishop Middleham, which if possible, was even more impregnable. " In after times," to apply to both what Surtees says of the latter, " it is no wonder that they were deserted for the green glades of Auckland." The towers of Bishop Middleham have for centuries been levelled with the earth, and the Castle of Durham, although additions and alterations were continually made by one prelate after another, appears for a long series of years to have been only used by them as a place of occasional residence. Since the curtailment of the privileges and revenue of the see, it is held in trust by the Bishop for the University of Durham, who have thus acquired a ' local habitation' whose time-honoured and lofty walls must be associated, in the minds of those who spend within them the years of their academic life, with feelings which no building of yesterday, however stately, could excite in the mind. There are probably no por tions of the present building older than the time of William the Conqueror, who built a Castle here in 1072 on the ruins of one which perished by fire in 1069. Of the outworks of the Castle nothing remains. 138 The name of the Street of the North and South Bailey, indicates, as has been observed, that the Ballia of the Castle were in that direction, but they have been for centuries occupied as they are at present by the houses of private individuals. Their former connection with the Castle is shewn by the fact that the houses in them were origi nally held by "military tenants bound by their tenure to defend the Castle." The great outer gateway which gave entrance to the Ballia and the Castle, perished, as has been mentioned in one of our earlier pages, in the year 1818. The present gateway of the Castle, occupied as as a Porter's lodge, is approached from the north wes tern angle of the Place Green. Its archway is Norman, and its strong oaken door, with its little wicket, and strong bars and strengthenings of iron, if not coeval, is at all events of very considerable antiquity. The tower of the gateway was built or restored by Bishop Barrington, whose arms are carved above the arch, but a more miserable spe cimen of modern castellation could scarcely be produced. Passing under its arch, we find our selves in the court-yard of the Castle, which is an irregular square. The great mass of the building is on its north and west sides, flanked on the south by the terraced mound of the keep, the admirable restoration of which has been effected since the Castle came into the hands of its academic pos sessors. The architecture of different and most opposite periods mingles itself in almost every portion of the fabric which meets the eye, but the irregu larity {produced by the additions and insertions of these various epochs produces a highly pic turesque effect, to which in the eye of an artist, the rich warm tint of the. stone conduces not a 139 little. The whole of the western side, in the cen tre of which is the chief entrance, was originally taken up with Bishop Hatfield's great hall, which in the noble proportions of its pristine state was 132 feet long, and 36 wide. In consequence of the alterations made at the lower end by Bishop Fox, the character of that part of its exterior under went considerable changes. The decorated win dows of Hatfield's period, two of which still look into the court -yard from the upper end of the hall, disappeared, and a number of square-headed mul- lioned windows of different sizes were irregularly inserted in the wall, to suit the various chambers and staircases into which the lower part of the hall was converted. The large oriel window has been thrown out since the University have been in pos session of the Castle. The great entrance with its Ionic pillars and classical entablature, and other Palladian features was an addition of Bishop Cosin, whose shield of arms, with mitre and crest forms its crowning ornaments. The quarterings which are disposed in a large square panel let into the wall overhead are of the same date. The altera tion in the character of the buttresses of this part of the building and the octagonal stone cupolas with which they have been made to terminate may also perhaps be attributed to the same prelate. The north side of the building presents a very irregular front to the court-yard, the angle which it forms with Hatfield's hall on the west, being filled by a projecting tower containing a staircase which gives access from the hall to the gallery and other apart ments. Between this and the clock turret, parallel with the main building, but at a lower elevation, is the long gallery built by Bishop Tunstall lighted by three square headed windows, with mullions and transoms, and a large bay window at its south- 140 eastern end, apparently at a later period, probably by Bishop Cosin. The clock turret we have men tioned affords communication from the court-yard by a stone staircase to the east end of this gallery and to the Chapel, which was also built by Tun- stall, and as seen from the court-yard, appears to stand at some elevation, being partly seated on the mound which forms the basis of the keep, towards which it branches off from the other part of the building, with a low roof, and windows of de based style, evidently bearing date about the time of Cosin. The new building which appears behind the chapel forms the connecting link be tween the old part of the Castle and the restored Keep. The doorway under the great bay window of Tunstall's gallery gives access, through the old Norman chapel of the Castle, which we shall pre sently survey, and up some long flights of stairs, to the apartments contained in this new addition and also to those in the Keep. Bishop Tunstall's arms are frequently repeated under a square headed label on the walls of the various parts which he added. The wall of the main building, with its long line of battlement which rises behind Tunstall's gallery and its flanking staircase towers, is the front of the most ancient portion of the Castle, little as its new facing of stone and its paltry windows would lead to the supposition. This was the work of Bishop Barrington, whose anxiety to improve and restore the stately buildings attached to his See, was but ill-seconded by the skill of the Architects whom he employed. Having thus indicated the prominent parts of the fabric which attract the eye from the court yard, let us proceed to notice its interior. Bishop Cosin's portal, within which we find the 141 original pointed doorway with its characteristic mouldings and ornaments, ushers us into a space parted off by a screen from the lower end of the great hall. On the left hand is the wall by which Bishop Fox divided Hatfield's noble apartment, and converted the space thus gained at its southern end into various chambers and offices. There is a carving in the wall of Fox's badge, a pelican in her piety. Before passing through the doors of the screen, we may point out the apartment, just opposite to the entrance, where the buttery-hatch is still existing, and applied to its ancient purpose. It is of carved oak, black with age, ensigned with the motto e«lt &0O g facta and the year 1499. This place, as also the kitchen behind it, was like wise the work of Bishop Fox. Through the screen we enter the great hall, which even now curtailed as it is of its fair propor tions, is a noble room, conspicuous especially for its magnificent height. It has a low pitched open roof of oak, of plain character, to the beams of which Bishop Barrington added some ornamen tal spandrils, without very much advantage to the general effect. The wainscotting and screen were the work of Cosin, in the Italianized style of his day. Hatfield's decorated windows still give light to his stately hall, on the east and west, and it once possessed the additional feature of a magni ficent window at its northern extremity, before it was reduced at that end also, by taking off the room now known as the black parlour. Over this is a room, formerly the drawing-room, now used as one of the lecture rooms of the Univer sity, which is lighted by the window we have indicated. May we not anticipate a day when these rooms will be again added to the hall ? The painting of Charles I. at the head of the 142 room is traditionally said to be a memorial of that monarch being entertained here by Bishop Mor ton in 1633, but we fear this is but an uncertain legend. The other portraits which now decorate the wainscot, are those of the munificent founders of the University, with Bishop Van Mildert at their head, whose princely liberality and cordial co operation with the Dean and Chapter in their noble undertaking were but too soon lost. The portrait of Van Mildert is a copy from that by Sir Thomas Lawrence at Auckland Castle, taken by his pupil Evans, who also painted most of the Prebendaries whose portraits adorn these walls. A few pieces of old armour intermingled with spears and swords, and the banners once borne by the troops who were embodied in Durham during the alarms of French invasion, hang peacefully from opposite ends of the hall. A minstrel-gallery projects from the wall on each side, at its lower end. We might easily fill many pages with the histories of the stately entertainments given to Royal and Noble personages by episcopal hospitality within these walls. The saintly King Henry VI., the princess Margaret of England, and our Royal Martyr are among the many names which occur in the long list of princely guests. But we must forbear : " What needs me tell their feast, and goodly guise, In which was nothing riotous, nor vaine ? What needs of dainty dishes to devise, Of comely services, or courtly traine ? My narrow leaves cannot in them containe. The large discourse of royal princes' state."* In later times the Bishops of Durham continued to entertain here the Judges of Assize, on their * Fairye Queen. 143 circuit, but their public receptions of the Gentry of the county were for the most part at Auckland. The last grand festival of importance held in the antient hall of the Counts Palatine was in 1827, when Bishop Van Mildert entertained the Duke of Wellington, then on a visit at Wynyard, toge ther with many of his old companions in arms, and the nobility and chief gentry of the county. Sir Walter Scott, who was one of the guests, gives a picturesque description in his diary (Oct. 3, 1827) of the scene in the old hall, and speaks much of the dignified bearing and princely hospitality of their venerable host. After these long years of comparative disuse the acquisition of the Castle by the University of Durham has caused the old hall to assume somewhat of the cheerfulness of its ancient character ; it being now used as the dining hall of that body, a purpose to which it is most admirably adapted, both its size and character as similating with the best of the buildings erected for that purpose in the two elder Universities. By a door at its north end we enter the black parlour, an apartment which, as we have indicated, originally formed part of Hatfield's great room of state. It is now used as a waiting and reading room for the use of the senior members of the University. There are two old paintings in it re presenting the Castle and Cathedral, which give a good idea of their appearance some two centuries ago, notwithstanding the perfect independence of perspective displayed by the artist. There are also some pieces of antiquity ; — a headless effigy in stone, of St. Cuthbert holding the head of Os wald, one or two cuirasses, and a large oaken chest, strongly bound with iron, which successive generations of housekeepers of the Castle averred to be the coffin which contained the incorruptible 144 body of St. Cuthbert. It is an ordinary antient coffer for the safe-keeping of plate and costly robes or other valuables. A door opens from this parlour to the great black staircase, with its carved balus trades, the work of Bishop Cosin, whose arms appear over the door which gives entrance at the foot of the staircase to Tunstall's long gallery. The character of this gallery has been very much improved by the good taste which has re-instated the old hang ings of tapestry which Bishop Barrington removed. The folding doors at each end with the open screen- work of their upper part, are to be referred to the time of Tunstall. The chief glory of the gallery is the magnificent Norman arch, on the north side, which for centuries was hidden under lath and plaster. Bishop Barrington has the merit of re storing it to light. It has evidently been a chief entrance to the more antient part of the fabric built by Pudsay, after the destruction of the greater part of the original building by fire in 1069. Other Norman remains exist in the story above, which we shall hereafter point out. The doorway con sists of three receding concentric arches, with mouldings of singular richness. The outermost has a series of octagonal panels deeply sunk in the centre. The arch within this is billety and the innermost one has the square panel moulding, both of them ornamented with a profusion of small beads. Rose and lozenge mouldings, continued down the recesses between the shafts, form the divisions between the central portion of the arch, and its exterior and interior members. The zig zag moulding round the outermost arch is modern. Its original character has been the same as the outer moulding down the sides of the doorway. The door at the end of the gallery communicates with the Chapel, also, as we have observed the 145 work of Tunstall. His arms are carved on the jambs of the windows. There is no architectural beauty about this little building, yet it has a quiet, sombre air, well befitting its holy purpose. Suc cessive prelates have more or less added to or changed its fittings. The wainscotting appears to be the work either of Cosin or Lord Crewe, the latter of whom, as an inscription testifies, erected the organ-gallery over the ante-chapel. The original roof remains, but its plain open rafters have been concealed by panelling, adorned with bosses and shields, also, in all likelihood, the work of one or other of those prelates. This panelling extends no farther than the screen at the western end. The roof beyond, over the ante-chapel, is in its pristine state. The screen-work which parts the latter from the Chapel, and some por tions at least of the stalls belong to a much earlier period than Tunstall. There is a curious carving on one of the misereres, representing a man driving a woman in a wheelbarrow. The arms carved below the poppy heads on the sup ports of the desks on each side of the entrance are those of Bishop Ruthall. The inlaid panels which have recently been inserted in the wainscotting of the east end are portions of the wooden pulpit which we mentioned (p. 53) to have been recently superseded by the erection of a stone one in the choir of the Cathedral. Before ascending higher we may return through the gallery and indicate some of the principal apartments adjoining, and the objects of interest which they contain. The first we enter is the Common Room of the University, formerly the dining room of the Castle. It is a lofty and well proportioned room, possessing an old panelled roof of oak, which if cleared of its ugly paint, and divested 146 of some very incongruous ornaments which affect to be bosses, would give considerable character to the room, in spite of the carpenter's gothic of its mantel piece and windows. These it is hoped may one day be altered into something more in unison with the character of the building. Among the pictures which hang from the walls are paintings of some of the Apostles, which are not without merit, por traits of George II. and his Queen Caroline, and a figure in scarlet robes, said to be Judge Jefferies. An original portrait of Jeremy Taylor, the gift of Mr. Sutton of Elton to the University of Durham, has recently been placed here. We may also draw attention to an admirable likeness in miniature of Bishop Van Mildert. We may next direct attention to the apartment now used as the Senate-room of the University, whose walls are hung with - tapestry That princes bowres adorne with painted imagery :" producing an effect antique and venerable, which is assisted also by the rich carving of the chimney- piece. This is a good specimen of those of the Jacobean period, the carving and panelling being carried up to the ceiling, and richly adorned with shields of arms. These appear to identify it with the time of Bishop James. The tapestry repre sents the principal events in the history of Moses. Time has unfortunately dimmed the brightness of its colours, but the outline and grouping of the figures shew that no mean artist had been employed to draw the designs. A series of engravings of the subjects of the tapestry, has been published in outline from the drawings of M. Bouet of Dur ham. The Warden's room and ante-room adjoin 147 this apartment. They contain some paintings of considerable merit. The great black staircase we have mentioned gives access to the old drawing room of the Cas tle, which we have already mentioned as having formed part of Hatfield's hall, and to the sleeping apartments which are reserved for the use of the Judges on their Circuit. At the top of the stair case some of the recent alterations have brought to light a portion of what must have been long the exterior wall, of the original building, the mouldings of its N orman windows bearing all the marks of exposure to the storms of many years. The same alterations discovered also still more interesting remains of the Castle of Pudsay's time, in the shape of a long range of triple Norman arches, with zig-zag mouldings evidently forming the internal decoration of one side of what was doubtless Pudsay's great room of state. The cen tral arches are higher than those on each side, and are supported by disengaged single shafts with the ordinary Norman capital. Each has a win dow in its deep embayment. The repetition of these arches now forms one side of a long nar row gallery, on the other side of which are stu dents' apartments. If there could be an exami nation of the corresponding wall on the north we might arrive at more certain conclusions as to its original state and designation. This gallery runs east and west, and its windows externally are those which range above that of Bishop Tunstall. It has sometimes occurred to us as not improbable that these arches and windows may have been the clere story of Bishop Pudsay's hall, supposing the Norman doorway in Tunstall's gallery to have been its en trance, and that it possessed another tier of win dows below, on each side of that magnificent arch. 148 However this may be, a climb up to the leads of the roof may easily satisfy any one as to the original form and dimensions of Pudsay's hall, for it is as obviously marked out on the north, as Hatfield's is on the west, and if the flooring of his hall was on the same level as that of the present gallery, its height must have ill tallied with the stately pro portions of its length and breadth. We may now descend, and survey perhaps the most interesting portion of the Castle, assuredly the most antient: — the Norman chapel. This very curious specimen of the earliest Norman architec ture may certainly be considered to belong to the Castle built by William I. It consists of a Nave and aisles and has originally been lighted by small round-headed windows, the spaces of which may be seen on the north and east. Those in the north wall have recently been opened. The piers are plain and round, of good proportions, and not dis tinguished by that extreme massiveness which is the almost universal characteristic of Norman work. They appear more like an imitation of Roman architecture, and the curved ornaments at the angles of most of their capitals bear a manifest resemblance to Ionic volutes. They are also curi ously decorated with rude carvings of figuresand ani mals. The groining is also remarkable. It consists of flat ribs of regular masonry, filled in with a cross vaulting of rubble work plastered. The space which the altar has occupied is clearly indicated, the slab having rested on two brackets in the wall below what has been the east window. There is an ascent at this end of two steps. The pave ment of the chapel is undoubtedly co-eval. It is laid in a regular pattern of herring bone work. After many years of darkness, the recent altera tions which have been made by the University 149 authorities have restored light to this ancient and venerable chapel, so that its proportions and cha racter may now be studied with perfect conveni ence. From these old and silent walls which have witnessed so many mutations, a long flight of steps leads to a passage by which those who are desirous of seeing the mode in which the interior of the restored keep is adapted to the accommodation of the Students of the University, may obtain access thither. The old keep with its shattered and bro ken outline, shaggy with ivy, was perhaps a more picturesque object, but none can regret the purpose to which it is now applied or do otherwise than admire the skill displayed in the re-edification of its massy walls. The keep, as it was, dated from the time of Hatfield, having been built by him, doubtless on the basis of the great tower of Wil liam I. We must not omit to point out the terraced walks which encircle the mound at the foot of the tower. They look down upon the antient city and her branching suburbs, with the green fields and wooded hills which surround her on every side. Another terrace walk, communicating with those of the mound, extends itself along the north front of the Castle. This commands the old Castle moat, and is level with the top of an old round flanking tower, from which may be seen the re mains of some of the exterior defences of the Castle which connected it with the old gateway formerly in existence at the entrance of the North Bailey. The bearings of Lord Crewe and Bishop Butler on the north wall of the Castle indicate the share of each in destroying the original character of this front. 150 We may now leave the Castle, and retrace our steps to the Place Green, where Bishop Cosin's Library claims our notice. On our right hand in passing out of the Gate-house of the Court-yard is the ' privy garden' of the Fellows of the Univer sity, formerly that of the Bishop, from which by a private door he had access to the Library. That on the left, and the house beyond, is also now the property of that body. We believe it to stand on the site of the residence of the Bishop's Moneyer, and the place of the Episcopal Mint ; for the coin age of money was one of the many regal privileges which belonged of old to the Counts Palatine of Durham. , Bishop Cosin founded his Library for the use of his successors and the clergy of the diocese, and was peculiarly anxious respecting its completion, and for the storing it with books, concerning which he enters into the most minute particulars in his correspondence with his secretary, Mr. Stapylton. It is a large and lofty room, well lighted, and con tains a very valuable collection of books, chiefly Theological. The Bibliographical Decameron con tains a copious account of its contents. It pos sesses also some MSS. Among these is a Missale Romanum, once the property of the Church of Hutton Rudby, in Cleveland, as we learn from the following quaint rhyme contained in the book itself : — " Whoso owne me that dothe loke I am the Chourche of Rudby's bowke." In another book, called Tractatus XII. is bound up a very miscellaneous collection of Tracts, to wit, Flores Legum and Legenda Sanctorum side by side with 10 Receits in Physic and Chirurgery En glish, out of which we extract the following : — 151 " For the beytting of a wode [mad] hound take the sed [seed] of Box and temper yt wyt water & make a playster thereof & lay it to ye sore & yt schal be hoi [whole]." There are also the works of Laurentius, Prior of Durham, a Norman-French poem, Danseys deCartaigne, John Lidgate's Story of Thebes, and a copy of Chaucer, which might furnish various readings for a new edition. The MSS. were for the most part the bequest of George Davenport, Rector of Houghton-le-Spring, who died in 1677- An oaken gallery hangs from the wall, on three sides of the room, erected by Bis hop Van Mildert for the reception of the books of the University Library, of which his own munifi cent contributions formed the nucleus. It is con tinually receiving fresh accessions to its stores. The staircase turret on the outside of the building, which gives access to this gallery, was also the work of the same liberal benefactor. A grim por trait of Bishop Cosin, in his convocation robes, is suspended from the eastern wall of the gallery. A new and handsome mantel-piece of stone has re cently been added, over which is placed a bust of Bishop Barrington. The public lectures of the University and the meetings of Convocation take place within these walls. 152 €l)e JJUmberattg. The frequent mention we have made of the Uni versity of Durham, whilst contemplating the build ings now devoted to the use of its members, renders it necessary that we should give a brief sketch of the circumstances of its foundation, and advert shortly to its state and prospects. The idea of instituting a place of academic edu cation in the North of England, could scarcely perhaps be strictly called an original one, since it is well known that an attempt was made by Oliver Cromwell to found a college at Durham for that purpose, and to endow it out of the sequestrated property of the Dean and Chapter. This institu tion, or rather project (for it scarcely got beyond that,) naturally fell to the ground on the Restora tion, when the members of the Chapter of Durham 153 were reinstated in all their former rights and pos sessions. A century and a half passed over, during which no revival of the project of a Northern University appears ever to have been mooted. We believe that we are only giving the meed of praise where it is justly due, when we express our con viction that it has been mainly owing to the con stant recurrence of this idea in the mind of an individual member of the Chapter, and to his per severing efforts to foster it into life and action, that the University of Durham now owes its existence and celebrity. Many of our readers will not re quire to be told that we allude to the Archdeacon of Durham, who worthily presides over the Uni versity as its first Warden. The cordial co-opera tion of the Chapter was not wanting, and as we have before had occasion to observe the most heart-felt interest in the proposed plan was evinced by Bishop Van Mildert, who rendered his aid in the most munificent manner, in order that nothing might be wanting which could promote the vigour and activity of its initiatory proceedings. The emanation indeed of such a plan from the Dean and Chapter of Durham, was but a carrying out of one of the objects of their foundation : amongst which the promotion of learning is dis tinctly particularized in their Charter.* At the dissolution moreover they became possessed of the endowments of Durham College in Oxford, founded originally by Prior Hoton and the Convent of Durham in 1 290, and enlarged by the benefactions of Bishops Bury and Hatfield. So that the esta blishment of another Durham College by the Dean * Operam dedimus, quatenus humana prospicere potest infirmitas, ut im- posterum ibidem sacrorum eloquiorum documenta et nostra? salutiferte redemptionis sacramenta pure administrentur, bonorum morum disciplina observetur juventus in Uteris liberalibus instituatur. Extract from the pre amble of the Foundation Charter of the Cathedral Church of Durham, by l$ing Henry Fill., 12