YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY THE LIBRARY OF THE DIVINITY SCHOOL THE CENTRAL TEACHING or JESUS CHRIST jgxm THE CENTRAL TEACHING JESUS CHRIST A STUDY AND EXPOSITION OF THE FIVE CHAPTERS OF THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. JOHN, XIII. TO XVII. INCLUSIVE BT THOMAS DEHANY BERNAKD, M.A. Canon and Chancellor or "Wells Author of " The Progress of Doctrine in the New Testament ' Bampton Lectures, 1864 WeiB gork MACMILLAN AND CO. AND LONDON 1892 All rights reserved Copyright, 1892, Bt MACMILLAN AND CO. Typography by J. S. Cushing & Co., Boston, U.S.A. Presswork by Berwick & Smith, Boston, U.S.A* PKEFACE This book had its origin in some lectures deliv ered under a Diocesan scheme of " Higher Relig ious Education." Having afterwards undertaken to put in a readable shape the lines for the study of this part of Holy Scripture which had been then suggested, I soon found myself enlarging upon those notes, and exceeding the brief treatment proposed. In the holy atmosphere of that record, in presence of the solemn crisis to which it belongs, of the touching incidents, the wide range of dis course, and the deep significance of its words, a more anxious study and a more deliberate exposition were naturally created. Thus a fuller treatment became inevitable, as attention was more closely given to the divisions and connections of discourse, to the distinctions and relations of topics, to the twofold character of words addressed to hearers at the moment, and consigned to the Church forever, and especially to the central place of this teaching in the whole doctrine of Christ, and consequently to the transitional office which it fulfils in the PREFACE development of the scheme of the Gospel. Thus it was that the notes of lectures became a book. I was the more inclined to prosecute this work for two reasons, one literary and the other per sonal. In ranging through the literature of the subject, I did not find that there is any book which does precisely what is here intended. Certainly a student has abundant aids, both exegetical and homiletical. In the multitude of Commentaries on the Fourth Gospel this section has its place ; and its texts and topics have been treated in countless sermons, lectures, and meditations. But I doubt whether there is any one book which at once covers the ground and is conterminous with it ; one that treats it as a whole in itself, in the way both of interpretation and reflection. If there be no such book, it is fit that there should be one, and of a kind suited for reading rather than for reference. Under this impression I applied myself more willingly to a task which did not appear to be superfluous. At the same time it was in my own mind the return to an idea which had occurred a quarter of a century before. In preparing the Bampton Lect ures for 1864, on "The Progress of Doctrine in the New Testament," my thoughts were occupied with the advancing revelation of Christ, as it lies before us developed in the canonical books; and PREFACE no part of that scheme impressed me so deeply as did the office of those five chapters of St. John, which close the teaching of Christ in the flesh and introduce the teaching of Christ in the Spirit. After completing such review of the whole sub ject (alas ! under very disabling conditions, and with sadly imperfect effect !) my thoughts reverted to that central stage of advance more frequently than to any other. But the further treatment of such a subject required leisure which was not to be had. One who, in a great pastoral charge, is engaged without cessation as preacher and teacher, in the practical ministry of the Word, must be deeply thankful for that kind of study of it which daily occasions demand ; yet he may often glance wistfully at paths of inquiry which he would have followed, had the duty of the hour permitted, or pass on by fields of thought, in which he feels he could have expatiated with pleasure, or imagines that he could have reaped with advantage. If such liberty comes at last, it is often under bodily or mental conditions which ask only for repose. But if it be not so, a less exacting public ministry may give opportunity, not only for a more tranquil study of the Word, but for some contribution to the Church of the kind which is here attempted. Per haps it would not be attempted, but for the meas ure of encouragement derived from readers of the former work, to which reference has been made. PREFACE It is a satisfaction to me to express my gratitude for intimations of interest and fellowship of thought on the part of readers whom I have never seen, both at home, and still more frequently on the other side of the Atlantic. Therefore I commend these words to my brothers and sisters in Christ, in England and America, with the hope that they may, in some cases, assist a thoughtful entrance into this inner sanctuary of the Written Word, which has been justly called " The Holiest of All." There, not only the writer but the readers, must study the words of the Lord Jesus, as feeling them selves in his very presence, and depending on the Spirit of truth, who, it is here promised, shall " teach you all things " and " guide you into all the truth." CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CHAP. I. Central Teaching II. A Study and Exposition PAGE 1 15 Part I THE INCIDENTS XIII I. The Preamble II. At Supper .... III. The Washing op the Feet IV. The Detachment of Judas V. The Preliminary Sayings . VI. The Premonition to Peter 3142 597488 100 Part II THE DISCOURSES FIRST DISCOURSE xiv I. Method and Character 113 II. The Foundation Word 123 III. The Final Prospect 129 ix IV. Self-Revelation V. The Promise of Power . VI. The Promise op the Paraclete VII. The Promise of Teaching VIII. The Benediction op Peace IX. The Accepted End . X. A Dividing Line 139 152157174 184190 198 XI. Life and Fruitfulness . XII. Love and Friendship XIII. Enmity of the World XIV. Witness to the World . XV. Treatment by the World XVI. Conviction of the World XVII. Illumination op the Church XVIII. The Sorrow and the Joy XIX. The Intercourse op the Future XX. The Last Words 209228240 252258269 283294303319 I. Scope and Order II. For His Work and Glory III. For the Disciples . IV. For All Believers . V. The Sequel 331340 359385 407 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I I have entitled this book " The Central Teach ing of Christ," and have described it as " a study and exposition." This title and description, when explained and justified, will place the reader at the point of view from which this divine teaching is to be here considered. The title implies that we have before us a sec tion of this teaching, which may be taken as dis tinct from the rest and complete in itself, and also as one which has, in relation to the whole scheme, a central position and office. The five chapters of this Gospel, thirteenth to seventeenth inclusive, are marked off as a distinct section of the book, first, by their historical setting, and then by their special character. They are the record of a definite stage in the communication of the Gospel, and constitute (so to speak)' a compart ment in the whole scheme of the Written Word. In the narrative of the Evangelist, the twelfth chapter closes the manifestation of Christ to his nation, with notes of final warning and tones of sad b 1 INTRODUCTION farewell. The story of those days, told in the other Gospels, is not repeated here. Only the public entrance into the city is mentioned, with two characteristic touches of reflection ; one on the ful filment of prophecy, not perceived till " Jesus was glorified," the other on the connection of the brief outburst of popular feeling with the recent miracle at Bethany, related in the previous chapter. There the writer passes at once to an incident which he represents as final. Before the Lord quits the Temple forever, a voice comes from beyond the confines of Israel, a- voice of Greeks — " We would see Jesus." " The hour is come," He answers, " that the Son of Man should be glorified." The multitudes of mankind rise before his mind, and at the same time the anguish and the death which must be the conditions of their salvation. There is a conflict, anticipating Gethsemane. There is a voice from heaverl. There is a revealing word which interprets the crisis. "Now is the judg ment of this world : now shall the prince of this world be cast out. And I, if I be lifted up out of the earth, will draw all men unto myself." Some questions of cavil or perplexity are answered by a solemn warning to use such opportunity as may yet be given. "Walk while ye have the light, that darkness overtake you not. . . . While ye have the light believe in the light, that ye may become sons of light." So ends the ministry to INTRODUCTION Israel. " He departed and hid Himself from them"; to be seen no more in public, save as led out to die. The Evangelist now reviews that mis sion as finished, and sums up the result. " Though He had done so many signs before them, yet they believed not on Him." But so it had been pre dicted. Two passages are cited from Isaiah, who "saw his glory and spake of Him." In one of those passages the Prophet had asked, " Lord, how long ? " and been told that the unbelief would last till desolation came. The desolation had come when the Evangelist wrote. Yet it had not been all un belief, even where it seemed to be so. " Among the chief rulers many believed ; but did not con fess it, lest they should be put out of the syna gogue, because they loved the glory of men more than the glory of God." So it was, despite the solemn witness of Jesus, that belief or unbelief in Him and in his words, was belief or unbelief in God and in words of God. This assertion by the Lord Himself is the seal which the Evangelist affixes to his account of the mission and its results. That story is finished : and the narrative at the beginning of the thirteenth chapter takes a new departure, retiring within the little company of the twelve. There are spoken the words con tained in these five chapters ; and the close of this division is as clearly marked as its beginning. " When Jesus had spoken these words He went INTRODUCTION forth with his disciples over the brook Kidron, where was a garden into which He entered," and there the Passion is begun. It is therefore a separate portion of our Lord's ministry on which we enter here ; and its impor tance is evident from the space which it occupies, being little less than a fourth of the entire Gospel. The twelve previous chapters cover a period of nearly three years; these five are records of a single evening. In those we range through Judea, Samaria, Galilee ; we are in the wilderness, on the sea-board, in streets and synagogues, and most often in the Temple itself. In these we remain' in a single chamber of a private house. In those we are in the presence of " the Jews," the multitudes, all classes of disciples, hearers, observers, oppo nents. In these we are in the inner circle which may be called the Lord's own family. It is plain that what passes here must have an importance all its own. It has this value from these very restrictions, which constitute its special character, as a min istry to believers. The Gospel is written on a distinct plan, that of giving, at the same time, an account of the manifestation of Christ, and an account of the reception of it by those to whom it was presented. St. John traces with evident intention the advancing faith of the few and the hardening of the many in unbelief. He traces INTRODUCTION these processes not only by relating the facts, but by his own observations upon them, such as never occur in the synoptic gospels. The discussions and objections of the people and the growing antagonism of the representative classes are exhib ited in their progress towards the national rejec tion, in the story, which has been summed up with melancholy comments at the end of the twelfth chapter. Side by side with this history of un belief runs the history of faith, in those who " received Him," telling how they acted on the testimony of the Baptist; how they felt at once that "they had found the Messias"; how, at the first miracle, " His disciples believed on Him " ; how, when others " went back," their adhesion was confirmed (ch. vi. 66-68); how they shared in the impressions of the public ministry and re ceived deeper impressions themselves in more inti mate converse; how their faith was tried by a course which contradicted their expectations, and by a seeming impotence against the powers of the world; but how it was also sustained by works which they saw to be the testimony of God ; how their faith felt the strain of claims which tran scended their capacity of apprehension, and of words which they knew not how to interpret; but how this was more than balanced by the experimental conviction, "Thou hast words of eternal life." Thus through those years of association, with all INTRODUCTION their recorded ignorances, weaknesses, and mis takes, they yet beheld his glory, the glory as of an " only begotten from the Father," with a con sciousness only afterwards to be fully understood. And now this hearing and beholding, this educa tion and companionship, must end. The next three days will bring, in the Crucifixion the final shock to their faith, and, in the Resurrec tion the final seal ; to be followed by the transition, gradual at first and soon complete, to the life of walking by faith and not by sight. Thus a great work remains for the last evening. A teaching must be given which shall recognise the pi^nlS faith and raise it to a higher level, whigh shall he a consummation of the relation^-ih the past and. a preparation for those in the future. It cannot but be given under the genuine emotion of the hour, inspired by the full consciousness of tjae situation, the sympathy which naturally grows more com passionate, and the love which allows itself more tender expression in the moments of a great fare well. Such is the teachiug which we prepare to attend, when we approach this division of the Written Word, five chapters, which have been called "a Gospel within the Gospel," a sacred enclosure, an in terior sanctuary, where the Lord is alone with his friends; the manifestation to the world finished- the redemption of the world to follow. We enter INTRODUCTION under a cloud of divine sadness ; we find ourselves under the brightest illuminations of truth and love. Instructions, consolations, promises, revela tions, form the legacy which the departing Saviour leaves to his Church. The section of the Gospel thus marked off by its historical setting and by the nature of its con tents, holds not only a distinct but a central place in the teaching of Christ. It has this central character, first, as intervening between the narra tive of the manifestation of Christ to the world, and that of his passion and resurrection ; secondly, as closing the teaching of Christ in the flesh and foreshowing his teaching in the Spirit. Historically the central chapter of the Gospel of Christ is the narrative of his death and resurrec tion. These events consummate his manifestation on earth, and condition his mediation in heaven. " The death which He died, He died unto sin once ; the life which He liveth, He liveth unto God." In the one act He departed out of this world, hav ing finished the work which was given Him to do ; in the other He went to the Father to open the kingdom of heaven to all believers. Therefore, in the region of fact these events have the central place, as closing one part of the dispensation and opening the other ; and to these events the teach ing of the last hours is united in the most signifi cant manner. It is prefaced as being given " when INTRODUCTION Jesus knew that his hour was come, that He should depart out of this world unto the Father"; and " when He had spoken these words He went forth " to Gethsemane, the cross and grave. We listen under the consciousness of what is to follow, a consciousness all the deeper because the situation is not explained but understood. The instructions, which are thus made prelimi nary to the central facts of the Gospel, have also a central place in the course of education of the disciples, in respect both of the method of the Teacher and the attainments of the taught. It is the close of teaching given in the flesh by word of mouth, on the old terms of fellowship; and it gives large promise of another kind of teach ing to be carried on by the Spirit, leading into all the truth, and communicating "many things" which the Teacher had to say, but which the disciples " could not bear " then. The character of the in structions corresponds with this stage of transition, as preparing the faith and experience of a spiritual life different from that of the past, but on the verge of which the hearers stood. In regard to the attainments of the disciples we receive a like impression of transition. We see the reality of their faith, but we also see its limits. One after another they betray those limits by their questions. They ought to have advanced farther, but they have reached a level of faith which is INTRODUCTION treated as a sufficient basis for more decisive ad vance ; and " in that day " which is to follow, this faith will open out into fuller knowledge. Their personal position, however, will be better con sidered when we come to enter on the discourses. Here we only note the place which this part of the word of Christ holds relatively to the rest of it. If any one were to place on the one side the Sermon on the Mount and the general synoptic teaching, and on the other the Apostolic Epistles, expressing the Christian consciousness there at tained, he would very doubtfully trace the conti nuity of ideas by which the great change has been effected. The Fourth Gospel supplies that line of the teaching of Christ which conducts from the one point to the other; and it is the present section of that Gospel which does this in the most direct manner. It makes the whole teaching continuous, by telling how Jesus Himself, at the end of his manifestation, assumed the results of past instruc tions, in order to interweave with them the doctrine of the future. Without these chapters the apostolic conceptions and convictions would lose much of the precious securities given by words which fell from the Master's lips. With these chapters, we hear in those later writings the echoes of his own words, and find the doctrine of " that day " to be only what He said it should be. One great exception may, however, be taken to 10 INTRODUCTION chap. this statement, and that in respect of a doctrine which lies at the heart of Christianity as taught in the canonical Epistles and held in the Catholic Church; I mean that of the atoning merit and redeeming virtue of the death of Christ. That doctrine is not here. The ideas of sacrifice and propitiation, ransom and redemption do not appear in this teaching, and even the facts of death and resurrection are only implied under veiled expres sions. Elsewhere there are plain predictions of " the Son of Man delivered to be crucified," and " the Son of Man risen again from the dead," and also distinct intimations of his " giving his life a ransom for many," and of his " blood shed for the remission of sins." No such words are found in these discourses, spoken on the very threshold of the events. The view of the speaker is projected beyond them into a life for Himself and a dispen sation for his people, of which his death and resurrection are necessary conditions, but condi tions which are not here affirmed. The events immediately at hand would speak for themselves ; the interpretation of them would follow by the teaching of the Spirit. Had these impending events and the deep meaning of them been pre sented in these discourses, they would have been presented to minds incapable as yet of appre hending them, and certainly incapable of passing beyond them into the serener atmosphere of the INTRODUCTION 11 life in the Spirit, and the region of hope and faith into which they were to be led. In fact, the teaching of this night could not have been given as it was.1 As actually given it deposited in the minds of the disciples, and so in the mind of the Church, ideas most precious and most fruitful, constituting both a large proportion and a distinguishing char acter of the Christian habit of thought, as we know it in the apostolic letters. The first principle, " Ye believe in God, believe also in Me," there expands itself into the pervad ing undivided faith " in God the Father and Jesus Christ our Lord." The relations of the Holy 1 I may be allowed, in passing, to observe that we have in the absence of these doctrines one evidence of the accuracy of the report, for it is given by one whose mind was strongly and habitually possessed with the very ideas which are absent here. Not to speak of the testimonies in his Gospel, from the first word which drew him to Christ, "Behold the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin of the world," to the last deep im pression from the sight of the blood and water from the pierced side, we see how he places in the forefront of his Epistle "the blood of Jesus Christ which cleanses from all sin, " and the ' ' pro pitiation for the sins of the whole world," and in the forefront of his apocalypse, glory to Him "who loosed (or washed) us from our sins in his blood," with many a subsequent cele bration of " Him who was slain and purchased us to God by his blood," and of victory obtained "by the blood of the Lamb." The absence of truths which held such a place in the mind of the writer is adverse to speculations with which we are now familiar on modification of the discourses by "unconscious introduction of his own ideas," or " filtering of the products of his individuality" into the reports of the Lord's words. 12 INTRODUCTION Ghost with the Father and the Son, and his liv ing presence (which is their presence also) in the Church and in the soul appears in those pages as we first find them here. Whatsoever we there read of God in Christ and Christ in God, whatsoever of union with Christ and membership in Him, and access to the Father through Him, of worship in his name, of gifts and powers bestowed by Him, of participation in his peace and association in his victory over the world, whatsoever doctrine, whatsoever experience on these subjects we derive from those Epistles, has its origin and its certificate in the discourses of the last evening. To exhibit this correspondence be tween the condensed sayings here, and their ex panded consequences there, would be a treatise in itself; but any one who pursues the comparison will see with increasing clearness that this Christian consciousness in all its parts had its origin in the sayings of Jesus, and most distinctly in these. It is true that this consciousness is best known to us from the writings of one who was not pres ent in the upper room; but in this respect the utterances of St. Paul are at one with those of St. Peter and St. John. St. Paul had, as he tells us, his own separate revelations, but the fundamental Christian consciousness, of which I speak, however characterized in the individual, was the common heritage of believers. It might find an eminently sympathetic interpreter in St. Paul; but he was INTRODUCTION 13 neither the originator nor the peculiar possessor of it. He found it in the community which he entered, breathing in the atmosphere of the Church. We are not to identify a thing with the extant records of it, as if it existed only in them. For instance, these sayings of Jesus, as we have them, were written down by one Apostle long after they were uttered. He, no doubt, was always the best reporter of them, and was therefore chosen as their reporter forever. But were they heard only by him ? Ten other men were listening, men chosen for the purpose, commissioned witnesses, an apos tolic college. And why a college? That the members might assist and check each other's mem ory, and sustain each other's testimony; and that thus there might be a solidarity of witness and authority on the foundations of the Gospel while that should be needed. If any words of Jesus sank into their hearts, and by them passed into the hearts of others, surely it must have been so with these words, delivered as a last legacy, con fided to them as chosen Apostles, and gradually verified by experience in the day of the dispensa tion of the Spirit. I mean to point out that there was a world of Christian consciousness correspond ing to these predictive instructions, before St. Paul, twenty years later, assumed its existence in those to whom he wrote, and before St. John, fifty years later, bequeathed to the Church in writing his own habit- 14 INTRODUCTION ual testimony. That later development of faith and experience was as really the teaching of Christ by the Spirit as were the instructions spoken with his lips on the hills of Galilee or in the synagogue of Capernaum ; and between the two stand the tran sitional words of the last evening, which on that account are here designated as " the central teach ing of Jesus Christ." INTRODUCTION 15 CHAPTER II A STUDY AND EXPOSITION In describing this work as a study and exposi tion, I intend to distinguish its character from that of an inquiry and discussion. The two descrip tions involve different attitudes of mind in relation to the text which is treated. In the former we are considering it as it is ; in the latter, how it came to be what it is. In this case we have before us questions of preliminary importance, on the authorship of the Gospel, and, if that be granted, on its accuracy as a report. These and the like inquiries concerning the canonical Scriptures may be said to be the questions of the time, having been raised with eager importunity and treated on both sides with elaboration, erudition, and ingenuity in the last and the present generation. There is the more reason to bear in mind that those questions are preliminary, and to be kept in their own place, not following us with disturb ing influence into the inner sanctuary of instruc tion. It would fare ill with the school of Christ, 16 INTRODUCTION if attention to the teaching were embarrassed by uncertainties as to who was really the teacher; and if the disciples could no longer listen with the old trustful security that they were "hear ing Him and being taught by Him as is truth in Jesus." In the present case, one who has gone into these questions, with the result of an entire satisfaction, can the more thankfully set them aside, and follow the divine teaching with the per fect confidence with which it has been ever studied and expounded in the Catholic Church. A settled assurance as to the writer of the Gospel carries with it an equal assurance of his distinct com mission and peculiar competence to write, and of the special grace enabling him for the work which he fulfils in the testimony of Jesus to the Church and to the world forever. Such confidence is not in the least incompatible with the consciousness of the conditions under which the divine purpose was fulfilled. These conditions, in some most impor tant respects, cannot be better expressed than in the following words : — " The key to the Fourth Gospel lies in translation. . . . I mean translation in language from Aramaic into Greek : translation in time extending over more than half a century, the writer passing from young manhood to mature old age : translation in place from Palestine to Ephesus : transla tion in outward moulds of thought from the simplicity of Jewish fishermen and peasants to the technicalities of a people, who had formed for a century the meeting-ground, INTRODUCTION 17 and, in part, the union of the philosophers of East and West. " If we earnestly attempt to realise the life of the Apostle, and the circumstances under which the Gospel was com posed, it will lead us to understand how this process of development must have taken place in the inspired writer, and how absolutely essential it was to the purpose of his writing." * Certainly these several kinds of translation give ample scope for suppositions of such changes by the way as would create variations between the facts and the records of them, between the dis courses and the reports of them. Hence the luminous pages might be darkened by flitting shadows of uncertainty, study might be distracted by questions, and exposition arrested by discus sion. So it is in that stage of enquiry, in which Holy Scripture is being examined " like any other book." But if that very enquiry lead to the con clusion that it is not like any other book in char acter, origin, and relation to mankind, that there pervades its component parts another mind than the minds of its many authors, and that the Church has been right in recognising it as the Written Word of God, then those shadows pass from its pages and those distractions cease. Nor is there any part of Holy Scripture in which this assurance is more instinctively and justly 1 Archdeacon Watkins, Bampton Lectures, 1890, "Modern Criticism and the Fourth Gospel," p. 426-427. 18 INTRODUCTION felt than it is in these chapters, where the be loved disciple tells how, in his own hearing, Jesus spake. In the last sentence of the passage quoted there occur two expressions which, if worthily under stood, contain the secret of confidence for the student and expositor. These are "the inspired writer" and "the purpose of his writing." If his inspiration was a reality, and the purpose of his writing was the purpose of his Lord, then speculations about changes and developments are greatly restricted. If He who was the Incarnate Word and Saviour of the world would be known to his Church for ever, He would know how to secure the truth of that information, and to make it the very expression of Himself; and here He has employed for this purpose the agent nearest to Him, whose spirit was, beyond that of other men, receptive and retentive and open to that guidance of the Spirit, the promise of which he has recorded. Suppositions about psychological processes and influences of circumstances cannot in this case be equally admissible as they might be in ordinary literature and the common history of mind. If translation is one key to this Gospel, inspiration is another, as the presiding power which ordered the translation, and shaped its effects to the divine purpose of a perfect testimony. If the Spirit acted in directing the movements of the Gospel, how INTRODUCTION 19 much more needful would that direction be in the perpetuation of it. We read in Acts xvi. how this guidance led the Gospel into Greece. The preachers, "forbidden by the Holy Ghost to preach the Word in Asia," turned to Bithynia, " but the Spirit suffered them not " ; then a vision directed them across the sea. It would be scarce reasonable to believe that no like guidance was given in the formation of documents on which the faith of Christians would depend to the end of time. Surely it was the same superintendence .which led the preaching into Greece as the best post of advantage, and which fixed the writing in Greek as the most perfect vehicle of expression. In respect, then, of translation in language we are scarcely a step removed from the Lord. What is language but the vehicle of mind ? and we hear Him speaking in the upper room in that language in which He has provided that we should read most perfectly His mind and meaning. For ex ample, if we note in the discourses shades and discriminations of meaning, which the Greek lan guage supplies, we shall not have to enquire as to Aramaic equivalents in the original communica tions, having before us a version which is, by the Lord's will and provision, the version for the world, given as the word of Christ for ever.1 1 E.g. such enquiry might be suggested by the frequent ob servations we shall have to make on words carrying important 20 INTRODUCTION The same principle of divine guidance applies to other instances of translation, as from early to later life, from Jerusalem to Ephesus, from one mental atmosphere to another. There are pas sages in the Gospel in which the effect of such translations may be observed, and felt to assist interpretation ; but scarcely in passages which are simple testimony, least of all such testimony as is given here, and which must have been felt as a specially sacred deposit to be guarded and trans mitted with the most reverential care. Specula tions on the effects of psychological changes in the writer, on free handling of his materials, and on alterations, even unconsciously made, in the words which he reports, should here be under restraint. This is not a case of ordinary literature ; not that of an old man recovering distant recollections ; or of an author who has the right to exhibit his sub ject according to his later lights. It is the case of the chosen Apostle reporting the words of the Son discriminations of idea in the Greek, which have no adequate equivalents in our own language, which has but one word in common use to represent two which the more perfect language would employ. E.g. know for oiSa, yivdxrKu; go for iw&ya, iropeiu ; see for opdu, Beaptw ; love for dyairiw, tf>i\4w ; true for a\ri$ 7}s, d\7;9i>_s ; now for vvv, _/>. i ; from for irapi, d_-6, etc., etc. But the enquiry which our own experience of translation might suggest as to equivalents in Greek and Aramaic becomes of no practical consequence, if by the will of the Divine Speaker his communications are given us by the finer instrument which conveys to our minds all their meaning and force. INTRODUCTION 21 of God, writing as a witness of things committed to his trust, and which through life he had been used to testify. " This is the disciple which beareth witness of these things (o fiaprvpcov irepl tovtwv), expressing a recognised habit, and wrote these things (/.at ; and, in reference to their interchange 36 THE INCIDENTS in the exemplary passage (John xxi. 15-17 x), he observes : " All this subtle and delicate play of feeling disappears, perforce, in a translation which either does not care, or is not able, to reproduce the variation of the words as they exist in the original." Whether it cared or not, certainly it was not able, as the Revised Version has itself practically confessed. Here, however, we are con cerned only with one of these words Qd'yairdm') which became the great Christian verb, and brought into use the cognate noun which hea thenism did not employ.2 The verb and substan tive occurring thirty times in these chapters stamps their contents as a ministry of love. Yet, as the force of words is best felt by com parison, it may be observed that, while the other word (^tXet.) has more of the instinctive and emotional (it may be even unreasoning) char acter of personal friendship or affection, this word (ayairdw) expresses more of motive and of purpose ; it is a larger, deeper love, from con scious reasons and settled dispositions, out of reach of caprices of feeling. These characters of love, thus distinguished, are plainly not op posed. Nay, they are closely related, the one disposing to the other. In perfect human love 1 Augustin, imperfect in linguistic skill, from the same pas sage deduces the conclusion that the equivalent words in Latin indifferably represent the same idea. 2 " ay&ir-q, vox solum biblica et ecclesiastica." — Grimm. THE PREAMBLE 37 they are one. In fact, they are one here. But enough has been said; for love does not yield itself to analysis and definition. In such attempts its life seems to evaporate and the sense of it to pass from us. In regard to this love of Christ, the one distinc tion to be recognised here is that between his love to the world, and to his own which are in the world. The love of Christ to the world is love to men as such ; He being the head of the creation, which through Him came into being, and of the race of whose reason and conscience, He, as the Eternal Word, is the author, and with which, in taking flesh, He has assumed a natural and uni versal kindred. It is a love of compassion and benevolence and divine desire, in which He gives Himself for all, and dies for all, and provides recon ciliation, and preaches peace, and seeks the lost, and waits to be gracious, and would " draw all men to Himself." But the love for his own which are in the world is no longer mere desire and en deavour. It is being realised in results intended. It has found response, and is generating a recipro cal life, and has the joy of exercising an attraction which is felt and owned, and of carrying on a work which imparts blessing and tends to perfection, restoring men to God through relations with Him who has loved them, relations which are spiritual, intimate, and eternal. Such love enters into the 38 THE INCIDENTS inner life of the beloved, and finds occasion for its exercise in their needs and dangers, their infirm ities and failings. It 'delights to comfort and pro tect, to cleanse, to heal, to strengthen, to exalt. It is an inexhaustible fountain of gifts ; it is the " love of Christ which passeth knowledge." Yet, being true love, it is not content to give. It desires also to receive. It would be understood and trusted and confided in. It invites sympathy and fellow ship. It claims reciprocity of affection. It would not only love, but be loved. Even in these last respects this is the character of the love which these chapters disclose. For our sake they dis close it, teaching us how He once loved, and by consequence how He ever loves, how He now loves, his own which are in the world. Reflection on the nature of the love here ex pressed, puts us on observing the form and man ner of its expression, giving a certain aspect to the scenes which follow. Love is far-reaching and con veys its blessings down into the centre and heart of life ; but it has also sweet influences on its out ward aspect, and gentle lights which play upon its surface. Where these are wanting, the kindest intentions and most generous sacrifices often lose something of their effect; at least, they leave something to desire. No such want is here. In this, the longest record of more intimate hours, we see with greater distinctness the character of the THE PREAMBLE 39 intercourse which love had created, in the terms on which the Lord lived with the disciples, and the disciples with the Lord. In a measure this is understood from the notices of private converse scattered through all the Gospels. On exceptional occasions there is an overmastering sense of awe. " Depart from me, for I am a sinful man, O Lord." " What manner of man is this that even the winds and the sea obey Him ? " " They feared to ask Him of that saying." " They followed Him trem bling." But, notwithstanding this, the general habit is easy and unconstrained. They are not only his school, but his family ; He lives with them, and his presence gives grace and sweetness to the com mon life. Even to the public, the great Teacher was not austere. In contrast to the Baptist, " the Son of Man came eating and drinking," and en tered where He was invited, and sat down to meat. And the nearer men were to Him, the more the kindliness, as well as the holiness, was felt. Take for example the little incident in Matt. xvii. 24-27. Peter comes in with a doubtful question on his mind. " But Jesus prevented him, What thinkest thou, Simon ? Of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? from their sons or from strangers? When he said from strangers, Jesus said to him, Then the sons are free. But lest we should offend them go thou to the sea, and cast an hook, and take up the fish that first 40 THE INCIDENTS cometh up ; and when thou hast opened his mouth thou shalt find a shekel ; that take and give unto them for me and thee." Other incidents might be cited in which this sweetness of association ap pears, adding the terms and tokens of human affec tion to the deeper love of the Eternal Friend, interweaving, so to speak, the Te? dXkrjXoi? rr/v Taireivocppoo-vvTjv iy/cofi/Scoa-ao-de, 1 Pet. v. 5). Here, too, is the source of all actual fulfilments of these charges, and living exemplifications of this spirit. Here is the fountain head of that stream of self-forget ting love, self-denying devotion, self-abasing ser vice, which flows forever, and has carried its line of pure and heavenly light even through the most soiled and darkened annals of the Christian Church. It flows among us at this day, sometimes as seen in a course of professed dedication, far more largely diffusing its blessings along the natural channels of ordinary life. Yet this spirit does not prevail without hin drance : so much there is in natural character and in accustomed habit contrary to this mind of Christ. THE WASHING OF THE FEET 71 He knew these tendencies as not only in the world, but in the Church, and added to the charge and the example words of reasonableness and warning. " A servant is not greater than his lord, nor the sent than the sender. If ye know these things, blessed are ye if ye do them." Neither pride which disdains the humbler service, nor fastidi ousness which shrinks from it, nor indolence which evades it, have any answer to give. The last sentence may seem a truism in statement ; in prac tice none is more needed. So apt we are to rest in approval or admiration of an act or habit, as if it thus became our own. We want these simple words forever in our ears. They condense the ever-recurring admonitions of the word of God, which assign blessing, not to the knowing, but to the doing. The " happy " of the Authorised Ver sion is a good word, but the " blessed " of the Re vised Version is better. It has a tone of divine favour and exaltation ; and divine favour and ex altation are here. It connects the saying with the Beatitudes, where the same word opens the Gospel teaching, and sheds a rising splendour over the characters which it will create and the destinies which it will secure. Some customary imitation or commemorative repetition of the washing of the feet was not unnatural, and in some quarters there was a disposition to regard it as an institution, 72 THE INCIDENTS and even use it as an ordinance, in connexion with the sacra ment of baptism : but this was not admitted by the instinct of the Church, even in times most favourable to such adop tions. Bingham (B. xii. ch. 10) gives an account of this movement in the fourth century, and quotes Augustiu to the effect that many churches would never admit of this custom at all, lest it should seem to belong to the sacrament of baptism, when our Saviour only intended it as a lesson of humility. And other churches for the same reason abrogated the custom where it had been received. He also gives from a book which passed under the name of St. Ambrose, an instance of this debate, as carried on between the Church of Milan, "where the bishop used to wash the feet of the bap tised, and the Roman Church, which had no such custom, alleging that it should only be done in the way of humility, as the custom of washing the feet of strangers ; while on the contrary, the Church of Milan argued that this was not merely a business of humility, but of mystery and sanctifica tion, because Christ said to Peter, If I wash thee not, thou hast no part with me." One may argue with the Church of Milan, as to the character of the act of Christ, as shewn by his own words, but not as to any imitation by the Church as invested with a like virtue. As a commemoration of the great example of humility, it was used in various quarters, as by ascetic saints like St. Louis, and as adopted by the Moravian Brethren, and as connected with the celebration of Thursday in Holy Week, lingering long as an old custom in the English Church. " In 1530, Wolsey washed, wiped, and kissed the feet of fifty-nine poor men at Peterborough. The practice was continued by English sovereigns till the reign of James II. ; and as late as 1731, the Lord High Almoner washed the feet of recipients of the royal bounty on Maundy Thurs day. The present custom of the feet-washing at St. Peter's is well known" (Westcott's Note). Bengel's remark on iii THE WASHING OF THE FEET 73 that custom is also well known, very applicable during a long period of history, " that the Pope would shew a more serious humility by washing the feet of one king, than those of twelve poor men." Such customs belouged to a habit of literalism and externalism, not helpful in the long run to a true interpretation or application of the words " Ye ought to wash one another's feet. I have given you an example that ye should do as I have done to you." 74 THE INCIDENTS CHAPTER IV THE DETACHMENT OF JUDAS This evening the Apostles are to receive higher communications than before, initiating them into the deeper mysteries of that life that is to follow, and into new spiritual relations with their Lord. Special preparation for this in one way was meet, and in another way needful. Purifications for nearer communion with God were, under the old discipline, of two kinds. They consisted in wash ings and lustrations for superficial or occasional uncleanness, and in the elimination of that which was in itself corrupt. Such was the removal of objects connected with idolatry (e.g. Gen. xxxv. 2), or, in a typical sense, that of leaven in the Paschal time. The first of these purifications the Apostles have received by symbol and by teaching ; but the second is yet to come. They are pronounced to be " clean, but not all." There is among them one case of essentially evil condition, which the wash ing of Jesus could not cleanse, and the teaching of Jesus could not touch. It has reached a stage of corruption which appears no longer susceptible iv THE DETACHMENT OF JUDAS 75 of change. It must be taken away. One of the Twelve must go. Till the brotherhood is relieved of this foreign element and false fellowship the spirit of the Lord is restrained, and the communi cations of love are stayed. We have now to observe the process of removal, accomplished without exposure or compulsion, in a manner gentle to the end, though significantly and severely sad. The note of warning just given is now repeated : — " I speak not of you all : I know whom I have chosen : but that the scripture may be fulfilled. He that eateth my bread lifted up his heel against me. From henceforth I tell you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye may believe that I am. Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that receiveth whomsoever I send receiveth me : and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me" (18-20). The language is abrupt and elliptical. Critics remark on a want of connexion. Commentators supply connexions of thought, sometimes rather forced. One cannot doubt that through these scenes more was said than is recorded, and that the mem ory of the evangelist fastens on the salient points. But we also know that this character of expression is itself natural when the mind is occupied with two opposed ideas. The predominant thought proper to the company of disciples is that of the relations of the servants to their lord, and of those sent to him who sends them; and this is 76 THE INCIDENTS the subject at first and at last in verses 17 and 20 marked by the emphatic " Amen, Amen, I say to you." But, alas ! this thought is crossed and disturbed by the consciousness that one of this chosen body is now a treacherous and injurious enemy. The fact is expressed in words from the forty- first Psalm. How naturally at all times do the words of Scripture rise to the lips of Jesus ! There was a kind of consolation in the familiar sounds which were records of what others had felt, and forecasts of what He was feeling. " The Scrip ture is fulfilled " in his person, not only in the sense of definite prediction, but also in that of analogous experience. Thus Jesus connects his own history with that of Psalmists and Prophets. What was fulfilled in them and in others like them was with deeper significance fulfilled in Him. ... So it was with many other experiences, and so it was with this, namely, the experience of ingratitude, falsehood, and treachery, in a favoured companion taking a wicked advantage in the day of trouble and aggravating other sorrows. " Also," said the Psalmist, "the man of my peace, eater of my bread, lifted the heel against me," in despite or violence, to spurn or to trample. Every one must notice that in the citation the words "whom I trusted " are omitted. It could not be said in this case by one who " needed not that any should tes- iv THE DETACHMENT OF JUDAS 77 tify of man, for He knew what was in man." He was not deceived in Judas ; and He precludes the thought. " I know whom I chose," — chose (that is) into the inner circle of companionship and educa tion for apostolic office ; as it is written, " He called unto Him his disciples, and from them He chose twelve, whom also He named Apostles " (Luke vi. 13), and again, "Did not I choose you the Twelve " (John vi. 70), and again, He gave commandments to the Apostles whom He chose (Acts i. 2). The deeper meaning of election to life cannot be brought into those sayings, and scarcely comports with this. Doubtless Judas was chosen under a divine impulse, and also with rea sons which would have made the choice natural as that of a disciple most forward in his adhesion. It is evident that he had seemed to justify the appointment as being a useful member of the soci ety, keeping the bag and managing the affairs. But under a hypocrisy imposed by that holy fel lowship, worldliness and falseness were all the time growing on the man's soul ; and this is the upshot. All that has gone on has been tending to this end (as it is tersely said) : " that the Scripture should be fulfilled, 'He that did eat my bread has lifted up his heel against me. ' " i i ' Bishop Perowne, in commenting on Psalm xii., points it out as an illustration of the construction often to be put on IVo i, ypaip^i 7rXi)/3U-ii. 78 THE INCIDENTS Not till the last moment, when it becomes neces sary to do so, does Jesus reveal his knowledge of the one exception in the hearts which were open to his view. Once only, a year before, at a critical turning-point and under painful experience of de sertions, He had answered an assurance of faith, proffered in the name of his disciples, with the startling words, " Did not I choose you, the Twelve, and of you one is a devil? " It may be that some manifestation of the evil mind, at that testing mo ment, open to his eye, then evoked the expression. But it was a solitary disclosure of knowledge and of pain, and no difference of terms or of treatment attracted the observation of the rest, so that even in this last scene there was no suggestion of his being the man intended. But the time is come when silence must be broken. "Now," says the Lord («•_-' dpn, from this moment) " I tell before it comes to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye may believe." He speaks in that considerate care for the disciples which is part of his "love unto the end." The discovery, which will be a shock to their feelings, may also be a shock to their faith, if it should seem that what was to them unknown and unfore seen was also unknown and unforeseen to Him. I speak, He means, to anticipate such thoughts, and to confirm your hearts in " believing that I am " (6Vt eyco etyiit). There is no predicate. The iv THE DETACHMENT OF JUDAS 79 silence means more than any single word could tell. To those who heard it, the expression was not unknown (viii. 24, 28, 58). It is not for us to add limiting explanations ; but here, as bearing on the faith of Apostles, it includes all that I am towards you whom I send, and towards those to whom I send you. Whoever falls, I remain the same, and so does my commission. The ruin of an Apostle does not affect the apostleship. " Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that receiveth whomsoever I send, receiveth me ; and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me." Those addressed were the chosen intermediaries, and so the future of the Church, of the Gospel, and of the salvation of men was involved in those words. Two more steps are to be taken before the pain ful incident is closed by the elimination of the traitor. A second announcement follows, declar ing the nature of the act, and then a third, desig nating the very man ; after which he is gone. In the scene of the feet washing, we observed the living touches of vivid memory. Even more do we observe them here. The details of the inci dent are before us as spectators of it, or rather as sharers in it. We receive the impressions of the moment from gestures and movements, and chang ing looks, and little tokens of the terms on which the persons are with each other. We are sensible of the painful emotion of the Speaker, of the sur- 80 THE INCIDENTS prise and bewilderment of the hearers, of their various thoughts and suppositions. How weak is the effect of many a laboured description compared with that produced by these brief touches : — " When Jesus had thus said, he was troubled in the spirit, and testified, and said, Verily, verily, I say unto you, that one of you shall betray me. The disciples looked one on another, doubting of whom he spake. There was at the table, reclining in Jesus' bosom, one of his disciples, whom Jesus loved. Simon Peter, therefore, beckoneth to him, and saith unto him, Tell who it is of whom he speaketh. He, leaning back, as he was, on Jesus' breast, saith unto him, Lord, who is it ? Jesus, therefore, answereth, He it is for whom I shall dip the sop and give it him. So when he had dipped the sop, he taketh and giveth it to Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot. And after the sop, then entered Satan into him. Jesus therefore saith unto him, That thou doest, do quickly. Now no man at the table knew for what intent he spake this unto him. For some thought, because Judas had the bag, that Jesus said unto him, Buy what things we have need of for the feast, or that he should give something to the poor. He then, having received the sop, went out straightway: and it was night" (21-30). " He was troubled in the spirit " (ex_/)_^ftj reo 7. _e_y_a.-, Kai l^apTvp^o-e), says the disciple who was close by his side. The look and tone shewed how strongly the deeper nature was stirred ; and the words sounded as a solemn testimony. The Amen, Amen, proper to great principles or reveal ing utterances, is really wanted here: so incon ceivable does the statement seem. Can it be meant THE DETACHMENT OF JUDAS 81 that one of you, my daily companions, who have watched my works and learned at my lips ; you, who have adhered when others forsook, who are now clinging to me in face of a hostile world — that one of you shall betray me? There was no doubt what this word intended ; for all knew that the authorities were watching for an opportunity to seize and destroy, and that their action was only arrested by the feeling that prevailed among the people and the fear of consequences. The word here employed (7. a/_a_t___ at), to pass into other hands, is translated sometimes "betray," sometimes "deliver" or "deliver up," according (it appears) as the idea of treachery is or is not in the mind of the translators. It is a prominent word throughout these transactions, occurring fif teen times in this Gospel and often also in the others. This emphatic repetition offers two sug gestions. The first is that the delivering up is not casual, but necessary, or falls, at least, under the providential fitness of things. The Gentiles have no power against Jesus till the Jews deliver Him up. The Jews have no possession of Him till He is delivered up by a disciple. Is it not part of a great system of government, under which the power of evil cannot act effectually till it has found some starting-point within the inner circle or within the soul ? ' The other suggestion is that of the self- abandonment of Him who suffers Himself to be 82 THE INCIDENTS thus betrayed and delivered. There is no resist ance, defence, or flight. Men do unto Him "what ever they list," as He said they would (Matt. xvii. 12). He leaves Himself in their hands when the hour is come to do so. They take their responsi bility in what they do ; He fulfils his in what He suffers. The announcement, now made, sent a shock and a thrill through the company. We can well imagine it. The most expressive picture in the world, though blurred by time, still inspires the beholder with a sympathetic apprehension of that experience. The single expression here, which tells how in doubt and amazement they looked one on another, is supplemented in the other Gos pels, where we see them " exceeding sorrowful," saying unto Him one by one, Is it I ? and another saying, Is it I? and pursuing excited questioning among themselves. In the midst of the agitation, and while attention is thus distracted, Peter signs to John, who will know if any one does, and in an undertone asks (for this is the adopted reading), " Say who it is of whom he speaks." John, " hav ing leaned back on to Jesus' breast " (dvaireo-cbv eirl rb o-rij^o?), looks up and asks, Lord, who is it? and is answered, He it is for whom I shall dip the sop and give it to him. There is point here in the definite article, as in so many other places, where the Authorised Version has missed it. To dip a sop iv THE DETACHMENT OF JUDAS 83 is a casual act ; to dip the sop is a customary act, which has its place in the order of the supper. The morsel (to -ty-wp,Lov) prepared by the head of the company was delivered at the proper moment to one whom he might choose. " We have direct testimony," says Edersheim (ii. 506), " that about the time of Christ, the sop which was handed round consisted of these things wrapped together : flesh of the Paschal Lamb, a piece of unleavened bread, and bitter herbs. This, we believe, was the sop which Jesus, having dipped it for him in the dish, handed first to Judas, as occupying the first and chief place at table." By this act, or by a single word before it, his own question, Rabbi, is it I? was answered. Now that the supper proceeds and silence is restored, after Judas has received the sop, the charge is given him, " What thou doest, do quickly " ; and immediately he has risen and is gone, leaving his comrades in innocent speculations on his errand. Such is the outward story. Our reflections turn to the action of the two chief persons in the scene, the Master and the traitor. Of the first we can speak only with reverent reserve. But it is instructive to observe the course pursued. The treason must be detected and the man removed ; but there is neither denunciation nor expulsion. What is necessary is said ; only what is necessary ; and that only when it is be- 84 THE INCIDENTS come necessary; yet it serves the purpose. The Master shews that He is not deceived. The traitor feels himself discovered, but does not find himself exposed ; he is warned, but yet left free ; finally he is detached, though not expelled. He goes out himself, like those of whom St. John wrote long afterwards, " They went out from us, but they were not of us. If -they had been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they may be manifest that they all were not of us " (1 John ii. 19). Thus Judas dropped away, as a consequence of his own con dition, and by a kind of natural process, like a diseased branch in a healthy organism which a touch is sufficient to sever. At the same time the disciples are preserved from feelings wliich would have ill prepared their minds for those pre cious hours. As it is, they are humbled for them selves instead of being roused against another. If criticising mere human action, we should admire the self-restraint and forbearance, the pity and the patience, the judgment and the tact, by which these results were secured. Surely these qual ities, as they here appear, are as much a part of the great example, as is that to which St. Peter directs attention amid the revilings and sufferings which follow. Had this part of the example been felt aright, how much denunciation, recrimination, and invective, how much harsh and hasty treat- iv THE DETACHMENT OF JUDAS 85 ment, how many expulsions and excommunications, would have been prevented ? Yes! and if it were duly felt among ourselves, how much that is said and done in a like spirit would be prevented now? The last word has its lesson also, o 7. otet?, 7. 0M7- o-oy rd^iov (What thou doest, do quickly). It is a word of dignity and command — command, not to do the thing, but to do it quickly. In the Greek a distinction between the deed, as a whole, and the execution of it, lurks in the two tenses, in a way that cannot be given in the English. The deed is all the man's own : that is contained in " What thou doest " : but it is to be done "quickly," rd^iov (literally, more quickly), the comparative form suggesting possible delays which the speaker will not interpose. He is all the time master of the situation. And so He is in all treasons, rebellions, sins ; yet, as here, the initiative, the choice, the will, all that creates moral respon sibility, belongs to the agents. They incur and they must bear it. From Jesus our thoughts turn to Judas. He is here" in silence, but for the single question, which was answered by an act, or by a word in his ear. Secret are the histories of men's hearts. One may be sitting among his comrades in total isolation from them, and in a condition utterly at variance with seeming and circumstance. So was it with this man " being one of the Twelve." THE INCIDENTS We can but imperfectly estimate a character so suddenly revealed at last. But peculations from the common purse and the bargain struck for money are evidences of worldliness and falseness in their meanest form, and proofs that his adhesion as a disciple had been based upon entirely earthly expectations. He knew not the bond which others felt : " Lord, to whom shall we go ? Thou hast words of eternal life." Yet had he ability to suit him self to his company, to assume its spiritual tone, and shew like devotion to the Master. That must have been a habitual and corrupting hypocrisy, by which, being what he was, he was taken for what he seemed. Perhaps there was one better pre pared than the rest for the last discovery. St. John is charged by M. Renan with a bitter per sonal enmity to Judas. He was indeed likely to have some sense of the man's real character. He had (we see it in his writings) a habit of observing purposes and motives, and also an instinct in per ceiving them; and his spiritual turn and pure, elevated mind might well be sensible of a certain repugnance to so uncongenial a companion. But be that as it may, the rest had in general no per ception of what manner of man Judas was, seeing in him only such minor faults as they saw in one another. It is at least remarkable that through this trying scene, no doubtful attention was spe cially fixed on him, and that he left the room rv THE DETACHMENT OF JUDAS 87 followed not by dark suspicions, but by supposi tions of service or mercy. But what was passing in his own mind during that searching hour, as the successive steps of warning and detection came ever closer to himself? Were there mo ments of alarm, of hesitation, of relenting, as the plain words fell on the moral confusion of his soul? It is probable; but, if there were, they were set aside ; and then after the last act of customary kindness there ensued a fuller posses sion by the power to whose suggestions he had yielded before. " After the sop Satan entered into him." That is no figure of speech ; it is simple, awful truth. It is a revelation of the terrible fact which lies behind the darkest, strangest parts of human history. Such a revelation is proper to this supreme moment, and to the commence ment of the story of the greatest crime of the world. Thus possessed, the man could no longer continue in that holy presence. It was a relief to hear the word, and to escape into the dark. " He went immediately out, — and it was night " — night indeed, — on the earth and in his soul; and there will be another going out into a darker night on the morrow. "From all evil and mischief, from sin, from the crafts and assaults of the devil, from thy wrath, and from ever lasting damnation, " Good Lord deliver us." 88 THE INCIDENTS CHAPTER V THE PRELIMINARY SAYINGS Judas is gone; and the situation is changed. Within the upper room the atmosphere is cleared ; without, the work of death is in hand. By his departure the company of the disciples is cleansed. With the bad man a bad principle and a bad influence went out. He concentrated and represented, in his own person, the earthly dreams and false ideas of the Kingdom, which in the others mingled with higher thoughts, and he must, have been a power to promote the worldly spirit among them, and with it those dispositions which the Lord was ever seeking to eradicate. He now becomes himself an example of what that spirit may pro duce. In his person this old leaven is purged out, that the residue may be clean for the Master's use. In them, notwithstanding their infirmities and mis takes, He now sees only " the unleavened things of sincerity and truth." In consequence, a weight is lifted from the heart of Jesus. The repression of feelings and restraint of words which that false presence caused are over v THE PRELIMINARY SAYINGS 89 now. He can speak without those reservations which truth has hitherto demanded. All his affec tion can flow forth without reserve, and all his proposed communications can be freely made to his own, whom He loves to the end. But Judas is gone to his work. While that holy converse proceeds in the room which he has left, he is hastening to his malignant employers, telling them that now, this night, he can fulfil his engage ment, asking for a sufficient body of men for the pur pose ; seeing them assemble with lanterns, torches, and weapons ; and giving them the directions to which they are to attend. His departure is the beginning of the end ; and it is under the con sciousness that the die is cast, and the passion virtually begun, that the Lord devotes the time remaining to that confidential converse with the disciples, which is to become his last will and testament to the Church. The Apostle whom Jesus loved is specially en trusted with that will and testament ; and delivers it, in this record, to all generations. Thus he be gins : — " When, therefore, he was gone out, Jesus saith, Now is the Son of man glorified, and God is glorified in him ; and God shall glorify him in himself, and straightway shall he glorify him. " Little children, yet a little while T am with you. Ye shall seek me : and, as I said unto the Jews, whither I go, ye can not come ; so now I say to you. 90 THE INCIDENTS " A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another; even as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are my dis ciples, if ye have love one to another " (31-35). We cannot tell whether these three sayings were uttered in immediate succession. They may have been spoken while the supper was proceed ing, and other incidents have occurred between them, even the Institution of the Sacrament itself. But we have to study them as they here appear. They are divided from the discourse which they introduce, by Peter's personal question and pro testation ; and it is well to take them apart, as they supply a general preface to all that will fol low. They reveal the true character of what is passing, as the glorification of the Son of Man. They announce the consequent separation from the disciples, who are left behind in the world. They deliver the new commandment, which is the law of their future life. I. " When therefore he was gone out," says the writer (as meaning that an obstacle was now re moved and an occasion come), then the concen trated thoughts found vent. The first saying is mysterious and sublime, being a revelation of the true character of the history of the Son of Man. THE PRELIMINARY SAYINGS 91 It has been justly observed that " this title is the key to the interpretation of the passage. The words are spoken of the relation of the Son of Man to God, and not of the relation of ' the Son ' to ' the Father'" (Westcott). What is the character of this history? It is given in a single word. Four times is the verb "glorify" repeated — twice as in terpreting the past, twice as anticipating the future ; the two periods being distinguished by the tenses employed (eho^do-Orj-ho^daet). Of the first period it is said : " Now was the Son of Man glorified and God was glorified in Him." He reviews the past, which is, however, still the present, though " now " at its very end. It was a history of humiliation, but of glorification shining through it. So it ap peared in review: " We beheld his glory, glory as of the only begotten from the father." The glory was manifested in miracle, as He spake concerning the crowning miracle : " This sickness is not unto death, but for the glory of God, that the Son of God may be glorified thereby." That was one side of the glorification, but this is another : The Son of God was glorified in power, the Son of Man in suffering. How was that? It scarcely needs explaining. If we account man to be glorified not by robes, and titles, and applauses, and splendid surroundings, but by great principles vindicated, great services rendered, and great benefits pro cured, and by the qualities exhibited in achieving 92 THE INCIDENTS these results, and by the labours and sacrifices endured in achieving them ; if we account the martyr glorified in his death rather than in his canonisation, and the conqueror in the battle and the victory rather than in his triumph — • if this is our way of thinking, we shall know in what sense the Son of Man was glorified, and how truly the glorification was being accomplished when the words broke from his lips. At the same time, in man this glorification only attains its true character when it is recognised in relation to God, and when the words can be added, " and God is glorified in him." Here this is spoken in the fullest, highest sense.. God, in respect of wisdom and power, is manifested in nature : " The heavens declare the glory of God." In respect of truth and righteousness, holiness and love, He is manifested in the moral being, and now at last really and adequately in the Son of Man. This is " the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ" (2 Cor. iv. 6). God is manifested in the person and the life: "He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father." He is manifested also in the work : " God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself " (2 Cor. v. 19). Seeing as we do now what the power of that personality has proved, what that life originated, and what that death procured, we read the true history of Jesus on earth in the words: "The Son of Man was glorified, and God was glorified in Him." THE PRELIMINARY SAYINGS 93 But this history on earth is a part of a larger history which has its next scene in heavenly places. It must be so ; and the necessity of this consequence found expression in the reading fol lowed in the Authorised Version, which has the words, "if God be glorified in Him." But this brief argument, which indeed need not to be stated, is disallowed by the better reading, and, as Westcott points out, it mars the symmetry of the saying, which he prints thus : — " Now was glorified the Son of Man, And God was glorified in Him; And God shall glorify Him in Himself, A nd straightway shall He glorify Him." In regard to the first statement, exposition was free, because that is an account of what took place on earth ; but before the second statement expo sition is silent, since the glorification intended transcends human observation, and is part of the mystery of "taking the manhood into God." The word " in Himself " refers not to the Son of Man, but to God, even as it is said in the prayer, "And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self." It is well expressed in Plummer's note, "As God is glorified in the Messianic work of the Son, so the Son shall be glorified in the eter nal blessedness of the Father " ; though the prepo sition may be taken to imply the unity in nature 94 THE INCIDENTS as well as in blessedness. Furthermore, it is said that this great change is close at hand, "and straightway shall He glorify Him." So it proved after three days, when very early in the morning was " Jesus raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father"; and then the day came when He was received up and "made to sit at the right hand in the heavenly places, far above all rule and authority, and power and dominion, and every name that is named not only in this world, but also in that which is to come " (Eph. i. 20, 21). Fitly do these words precede the communica tions of love. Though far above the intelligence of the hearers at -the moment, and uttered in the way of soliloquy rather than as addressed to them, the words reveal for future apprehension the true history of the Son of Man ; they throw the shadow of their majesty over the discourses which follow, and form the whole groundwork of the concluding prayer. II Clear as is the Lord's consciousness concerning Himself, it does not absorb his thoughts, so as to divert them from his present interest in his own who are before Him. These short hours are dedi cated to them. The glorification, on the verge of which He stands, involves the close of the human companionship. That must now be understood. v THE PRELIMINARY SAYINGS 95 The truth of the separation must be wrought into their minds by words which cannot be mistaken. The majesty and mystery of the former saying make more impressive the tenderness and plain ness of this : — " Little children, yet a little while I am with you. Ye shall seek me : and as I said unto the Jews, Whither I go, ye cannot come ; so now I say unto you " (33). He had said the last words to the Jews, while Pie taught in the Temple, and they were hovering round with malicious intention when "his hour was not yet come." To them He had said, " I go away ; and ye shall seek me, and shall die in your sin. Whither I go ye cannot come " (viii. 21). The same fact is announced, but in what different connexion, and with what different feeling! In the one case it is announced to enemies, whose seeking will be perplexed unbelief; in the other, to children whose seeking will be a longing of the heart. " Ye shall not find Me " is not repeated here ; for there will be a finding, not conceivable as yet, the promise of which will be given in the consolations and revelations to follow. But these themselves rest upon the fact, " Whither I go ye cannot come." The spirit of those communications breathes already in the tender word of address, and in the tone that almost sounds like regret : " Little chil- THE INCIDENTS dren, yet a little while I am with you." A word never used before betrays the special feeling of the moment. Twice had pitying kindness been expressed by the word retcvov : " Child, thy sins be forgiven thee " (Mark ii. 5) ; " Children, how hard it is for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God" (Mark x. 25). But here, for once, the word is used in the diminutive form, ex pressive of affectionate compassion," parental solic itude, and the intimacies of domestic life. Our English has no graceful equivalent, and can only resort to the more cumbrous form of " little chil dren." The address, as all must observe, dwelt on the mind of St. John like the rest of the language of these sacred hours. It occurs seven times in his epistle, and is connected by tradition with his latest ministry as a voice of parental affection and apostolic anxiety for the churches over which he presided. Thus has the impending departure and the con sequent separation been tenderly as well as plainly told, giving to all that follows the character of parting words and a loving farewell. Ill The departure must create a new situation, to which new provisions belong, and that which occurs first arises naturally from the absence of the Head v THE PRELIMINARY SAYINGS 97 and Centre of the family. Its members, hitherto united by their common nearness to his person, must henceforth be united by love to each other. How easily amongst those eleven men might jealousies engender alienation, and differences end in divis ion! and where then would be the work for which they were gathered into one body ? All know how these natural tendencies have been illustrated, not only in the world but in the Church. Therefore shall the duty of mutual love be bound upon them with the authority of a new commandment, the Lord's own love to them supplying both its motive and its measure. This shall be the essential character of true discipleship, and the sign which shall attest it to the world. "A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another : even as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are my dis ciples, if ye have love one to another" (34, 35). The commandment is addressed to the men there present, with an appeal to memories of love which had become part of themselves. But it is also ad dressed to them as representative disciples, re ceivers and transmitters of teaching given for all, and Christians recognise the new commandment as the supreme and universal law of the Gospel of Christ. Certainly it was not wholly new, as never heard before ; and the word employed implies rather freshness than novelty. But as certainly it was THE INCIDENTS not the characteristic of the Law. It had ho prom inent place among the old commandments. Once, at the close of various prohibitions of harsh and unjust actions, it occurs as bearing on the heart and takes us almost by surprise by its warm and comprehensive words : " Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart . . . Thou shalt not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the chil dren of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neigh bour as thyself. I am the Lord " (Lev. xix. 17, 18). Thoughtful minds discerned its importance and ranged it with the first and great commandment — the great Sh'ma, as it was called (Luke x. 27). The newness of the commandment as given by the Lord is justly ascribed by commentators to the new motive (as I have loved you), and the new standard and character of love which this motive involves. It is an admirable expression in Plum- mer's note, which compares the Christian principle described (1 Cor. xiii.) with " the measured benev olence of the Pentateuch." But beyond this new ness of motive and measure, there is also a newness of predominance. The principle which lurked in the old dispensation takes the leading place in the new. Comprehending all the commandments of prohibition (for love worketh no ill to his neigh bour) it rises to another level in generous largeness and moral splendour. It is not in the letter, but in the spirit, the reigning principle in a new life. THE PRELIMINARY SAYINGS For that new life, all that is passing now is the introduction : all that is taught is the preparation. At this very Passover the type is fulfilled ; and in the accomplishment of redemption, the old things pass away and all things become new. Close on the delivery of the new commandment was in augurated the new covenant by the institution of its seal and sacrament and by the words : " This is my blood of the covenant " (Matt. xxvi. 28) ; " This cup is the new covenant in my blood, that which is poured out for you" (Luke xxii. 20). So Moses had spoken when he sprinkled the people with the blood of sacrifice, " Behold the blood of the covenant which the Lord hath made with you " (Ex. xxiv. 8), and the tacit reference to those words declared the substitution of the new cove nant for the old. As, therefore, " a law of com mandments contained in ordinances " was attached to the one, so the law of love written in the heart is the congenial attendant on the other. This law will be again impressed in the discourse which follows; and it involves, also, the need of the gift which will then be promised. The mind of Christ must be formed by the spirit of Christ, and so the new commandment becomes the law of the new life. 100 THE INCIDENTS CHAPTER VI THE PREMONITION TO PETER Of the sayings thus cast into the hearts of the disciples, one would at the time naturally absorb their thoughts. A revelation to faith and a com mandment of duty may await reflection; but an impending departure and an indefinite separation give no room for other thoughts. As it is said afterwards, " Because I have spoken these things to you, sorrow hath filled your hearts." As usual, there was one to speak for the others, and, as was his wont, with a sort of questioning resistance, and the impetuosity of personal feeling. "Simon Peter saith unto him, Lord, whither goest thou? Jesus answered, Whither I go, thou canst not follow me now; but thou shalt follow afterwards. Peter saith unto him, Lord, why cannot I follow thee, even now? I will lay down my life for thee. Jesus answereth, Wilt thou lay down thy life for me? Verily, verily, I say unto thee, The cock shall not crow, till thou hast denied me thrice" (36-38). The passage is a part of the dramatic picture of St. Peter to which this Gospel contributes so vi THE PREMONITION TO PETER 101 much, and of which such living touches were given but a few lines before. The identity in all the Gospels of this highly individual personality is one of the links between the four records, an evi dence of the common memory which pervades them. The study of that character and the lessons to be derived from it lie outside the present pur pose ; and they are so often and so amply treated in sermons and expositions that there is no tempta tion to step aside to consider them. Either now or at an earlier moment, it appears that more was said than is written here, of Satan claiming to sift the disciples, of prayer for Peter's endangered faith, of a change that would come over him, and of his becoming a strengthener to his brethren. Thus comfort was given before the sad prediction which vain self-confidence drew forth. And yet another word of hope is not forgotten in the present report. "Whither I go, thou canst not follow me now," — thou art not called to do it ; and thou canst not ; thy faith and purpose are too weak, — " but thou shalt follow afterwards." In a few hours was fulfilled the prediction, "Thou shalt deny me thrice." More than thirty years later, the other words must have been present with power in the days of martyrdom. And later still, did St. John record them here, as also others of like import, in his closing chapter, remembering how they had been fulfilled in that death upon a 102 THE INCIDENTS cross in which his dearly loved friend had followed his Master, and "glorified God" (xxi. 18, 19). Such personal feeling may naturally have prompted the repetition of this incident recorded by the other Evangelists, and here with the addi tion of words which they had omitted. But there was also a reason proper to St. John's purpose for mentioning the predictive notice of the denial by Peter, as well as that of the betrayal by Judas. It lies in his care to show at every step the Lord's foresight of all that should come to pass, especially all that would more immediately affect his own little company. It was the foresight of love, which, knowing all that was in them, provided against the effect of future shocks to their faith. But besides such reasons for the interposition of this brief dialogue, there is reason enough in its effect at the time and its bearing on what was to follow. What a humbling word was this ! What a blow to self-confidence ! What a check to the eager impulses of profession ! No wonder that the disciple, often spokesman for the rest, now speaks no more. We feel it a touch of truth in the narrative that the silence so unnatural to him is thus accounted for. And the word which struck home to him must have told upon them all, making them more grave and reverent listeners to the communications which followed. Thus does this last incident complete the prefatory facts, so vi THE PREMONITION TO PETER 103 making the first part of the present exposition conterminous with the 13th chapter of the Gospel. The place of the warning to Peter in this narra tive suggests some observations on the harmony with the record of the same incident in the other Gospels. Here it is given in the room, followed by longer discourse, and some time before the call, "Arise, let us go hence." The remark that has been made on the effect of it confirms the truth of that position. St. Luke's witness is on this point the same. But St. Matthew and St. Mark men tion it after the departure, as if on the way to Gethsemane. They do not, however, assert that it took place then ; and it is frequent with them to mention facts in the order of idea, rather than of succession in time. The supposition of some commentators that there was recurrence to the subject on the road is not at all unreasonable. It was certainly a subject to which a man would be likely enough to recur as soon as he recovered heart to do so ; and some further words may have passed then which connected the memory of the warning with the later moment. The general question of the harmony of the record, on which we comment with the story of the same hours in the synoptic gospels, is not within the present purpose. We may, however, be sure that many words were uttered that even ing besides those which were in line with St. 104 THE INCIDENTS John's intention of didactic report; and in many of the words recorded elsewhere, we recognise points of contact with his narrative, and in all of them a perfect harmony with the spirit of it. On the chief feature in the three records, the Institution of the Eucharist, St. John is silent; and the reader can scarcely pass on without some notice of that silence, some question as to the place in his narrative to which the act should be as signed, some consideration of the relation between the Institution, which has no place in these pages, and the teaching which it is their part to give. The silence of the Gospel on this point has some evidential and some evangelical value. It is inconceivable that any later writer, aiming to get his version of things accepted as the work of the beloved Apostle, should have omitted from his account of the last evening the act which origi nated the central ordinance of the Church, and which consecrated that evening in the thoughts of all his readers. St. John being recognised as the author, this total silence on a subject, on which it is impossible to suppose want of informa tion, or of recollection, or of appreciation, must affect our judgment on other instances of omission in regard to which such causes might possibly be imagined, and consequently our interpretation of the entire Gospel, in respect of its selection of topics and its treatment of them with a purpose. vi THE PREMONITION TO PETER 105 On the question of the place in this narrative to which the Institution should be assigned, little can be said because assistance is so small. That place certainly lies within the range of the thir teenth chapter, before continuous discourse begins. The Institution occurred in the supper while they were eating (eadtovTav avTtov, Mark xiv. 22), and must have been at the close of it, both as forming a succession to the paschal meal, and from its own solemn character ; moreover, it is mentioned that it was " a cup after supper," as distinguished from the previous cup, in regard to which the conse crating words were spoken. It was therefore probably after the giving of the sop and the de parture, and would then fall somewhere near to the last verses of the chapter ; I should say at the very end of it, were it not that the warning to Peter is placed in all three synoptic gospels after the Institution. This consideration may incline us to place it as probably occurring after the first of the preliminary sayings (v. 32), or after the last of them (v. 35). The remembrance of the an nouncement of impending separation might well have dwelt on the mind of St. Peter, as the sub ject to which he would recur as soon as there was occasion to speak. Anyhow, there must have been a close proximity between these two features of the last evening, the Institution recorded in the other Gospels, and the Discourses reported by 106 THE INCIDENTS St. John. But the relation between them consists not in nearness of time, but in community of ideas and feelings. The condensed significance of the Institution finds in many respects an expanded expression in the Discourses. This correspondence may appear less obvious because the primary significance of the Sacrament is not reproduced in the teaching. Whoever asks the question, "Why was the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper ordained? " must receive the direct reply, " For the continual remembrance of the sac rifice of the death of Christ." But in the Dis courses there is no teaching of sacrifice and no insistence upon death. The consciousness of death is present, and the character and effects of it are intimated, though not explained. It is a glorifica tion of the Son of Man, and a glorification of God in Him (xiii. 31). It is an act of beneficent love, a "laying down of life for his friends" (xv. 13). But how it glorifies God, and how it benefits men, remains in the Lord's consciousness and is latent in these communications. In the Institution the truth is secured for ever in the words, " My body which is given, my blood which is shed for you and for many for the remission of sins." But it does not reappear in the Discourses preserved by this Evangelist. Yet is he the same writer who loves to dwell on that death as the propitiation for the sins of the whole world, and on that blood as vi THE PREMONITION TO PETER 107 redeeming us to God and cleansing us from all sin. But the fidelity of the reporter is not affected by subsequent knowledge. Those who were then addressed must witness the redeeming act as a fact before they can understand it as a power. That is part of the teaching, not given, but prom ised : " I have many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he the Spirit of truth is come, he shall guide you into all the truth." Meantime the anguish of the morrow is not suffered to confuse and darken the sweet confidences of the evening. Here death is thought of, not as constituting sacrifice, but only as entail ing separation. The fellowship that has been has reached its end, and the words are addressed to the natural feelings. of the moment, yet revealing the true relations which will endure when the transitory relations are over. Plence it is that, in one chief respect, the Dis courses do not correspond to the Institution, inasmuch as they say nothing of sacrifice, obla tion, and satisfaction for sin, scarcely even of death. They pass beyond it into the succeeding relations between Christ and his people. Of these relations the Sacrament was to be a means and a pledge, and it is in respect of them that we observe the living connection between the Insti tution and the Discourses. Is the Sacrament intensely personal in its refer- 108 THE INCIDENTS ence as concentrating the mind on Jesus Christ Himself ("my body, my blood, my memorial")? So are the Discourses occupied with the same thoughts of immediate relations with Him. Is the Sacrament felt as a perpetual token of love . appealing for reciprocal affections in the words " Given for you ; shed for you ; do this in remem brance of me " ? So are the Discourses a contin uous utterance of the same feelings, and a claim for the like returns. Does the Sacrament express an intimate union with Christ by participation in his body and blood, — a union not passing in the momentary act, but abiding in the condition which it seals, one in which we dwell in Him, and He in us, we are one with Him, and He with us ? These last expressions are themselves derived from the Discourses which teach an incorporation into Christ, an inherence in Him, a derivation of life from Him as of branches abiding in the vine, yet an abiding which needs a concurrence of the will, and calls for the charge which would secure it, " Abide in me, and I in you " ? Is the Sacra ment the testimony and seal of a new covenant (" this cup is the new covenant in my blood "), and, therefore, the perpetual celebration of a new dispensation? So do the Discourses present the characteristics of that new covenant in the "new commandment," the new ground laid for prayer and communion with God, and above all in the vi THE PREMONITION TO PETER 109 new gift of the Holy Ghost the Comforter. Fi nally, is the Sacrament an ordinance of fellowship and an act of communion by the participants one with another, and so with the whole Church? So «re the Discourses addressed to men not only as individuals, but as members of a company bound together by the common relation to their Lord, and by the commandment to love one another as He had loved them. These are living correspondences between the Institution and the Discourses. In all these re spects the Sacrament incorporates the teaching, and the teaching explains the Sacrament; and in this, as in so many other ways, St. John completes the synoptic record. Part II THE DISCOURSES FIRST DISCOURSE XIV. 1-31 CHAPTER I. Method and Character II. The Foundation Word . . . . _. 1 III. The Final Prospect 2,3 IV. Selp-Revelation 4-11 V. Promise op Power 12-14 VI. Promise op the Paraclete . . . 15-24 VII. Promise op Teaching 25, 26 VIII. Benediction op Peace 27 IX. The Accepted End 28-31 X. A Dividing- Line 31 111 Part II THE DISCOURSES CHAPTER I METHOD AND CHARACTER Before entering on the Discourses, it may be of use if we make some prefatory observations on the division of them, on their method or manner of delivery, and on their aim in relation to the hearers. 1. It is common to treat the three sayings (xiii. 31-35) as the commencement of the Discourses. Certainly they indicate that after the departure of Judas there is a new situation, one that will admit of more free and confidential communication, and they go far to define the situation both for Jesus and for his disciples. They shew three leading thoughts occupying the mind of the Speaker, which will make themselves felt throughout the Discourses, and be more distinctly resumed in the final Prayer. Yet are they rather preludes than commencements, utterances which give vent to the i 113 114 THE DISCOURSES chap. feelings, sudden jets from the fountain before the stream begins to flow ; and that outflow is stayed for a moment by the interruption of Peter. His question, unlike those of the others which assist the course of teaching, diverges from it by taking a turn personal to himself, and this draws a line of division, creating a new commencement for the teaching which continues through the three fol lowing chapters. We speak of this teaching as given in discourses rather than in a discourse, though the report has a continuous aspect as if no division had occurred. The division, indeed, is narrow, consisting but of three words, "Arise, let-us-go hence" (xiv. 31); but that is sufficient. Moreover, the discourse given in chapter xiv. has a kind of formal comple tion by a benediction of peace, and a repetition of the consoling words with which it began, "Let not your heart be troubled." Again, there is a difference of tone in the two stages of teaching, both indeed being revelation on the relations of Christ with his own, but the first marked by a predominant purpose of consolation, the second by one of instruction. Accordingly, the first dis course takes more account of the feelings of the disciples and of the questions then in their minds, while the second occupies an anticipatory stand point after the promised reunion, in the life and history of the dispensation which would follow. i METHOD AND CHARACTER 115 It suits with these differences, that the discourse in chapter xiv. is a prolongation of the converse at the table customary at the paschal meal, and nat urally begins with a certain amount of dialogue ; while that in the two following chapters supposes the hearers in some other position, and in an atti tude of silent attention, save for some whispered words among themselves at a pause in the dis course or at its close, and one common voice of confession responsive to the last revealing word. This return to a partial form of dialogue forms a sequel to the whole, and has the effect of riveting the words of consummation more immediately on the minds of the hearers. M. Godet concludes his arrangement of the chapters in respect of the order of sequence corresponding to the actual situ ation by an illustration which occurs very natu rally, and which some of the Lord's own words suggest. "So a dying father, after gathering his children round him, begins by speaking to them of his end, and of the time which will immediately follow. Then the perspective of their future career opens out before his thoughts, and he tells them what the world will be to them, and what they will have to do in it; after which his mind falls back upon the actual situation, and draws from its depth a supreme word and a last farewell " (vol. ii. p. 453). 2. Within these divisions are the smaller sec tions, created by succession of topics, which will 116 THE DISCOURSES chap. be more usefully treated by taking them singly as they occur, without any preparatory attempt to analyse the method pursued. The attempt indeed would be in the face of difficulties ; for the char acter of discourse is not obviously methodical. Method, it may be said, there is none. That is the confessed embarrassment of commentators and analysers. " This current of discourse," says Spier, " poured forth by the departing Saviour for future remembrance and glorification by the spirit, remains still inexhaustible for our poor under standings, and far transcends the common laws of our so-called logical order of thought" (vi. 175). It presents, says Vinet, " a divine confusion." Dr. Sanday gives a more precise account of this ex pression in his " Authorship of the Fourth Gospel." " We cannot but recognise a change from the compact lucid addresses and exposition of the syuoptists. This appears not so much in single verses as when we look at the discourse as a whole. In all the synoptic gospels, imper fectly as they are put together, there is not a single dis course which could be called involved iu its structure; and yet I do not see how it is possible to refuse this epithet to this discourse as given by St. John. The different subjects are not kept apart, but are continually crossing and entan gling one another. The later subjects are anticipated in the course of the earlier; the earlier return in the later. For instance, the description of the functions of the Paraclete is broken up into five fragments. The relation of the Church and the world is intersected just in the same way, besides scattered references in single verses" (pp. 231, 232). i METHOD and CHARACTER 117 This characteristic is acutely noted and worthy to be pointed out ; and when we are thinking of the synoptics and St. John, may lead to certain inferences from their different styles as reporters. But when we feel ourselves listening to the words of the Lord Jesus, such observations are sugges tive in another way. This " divine confusion " makes us feel that we are not hearing a discourse on " the functions of the Paraclete," or on " the relations to the world," or on any definite subject ; but listening to a living voice speaking, as it is natural to speak, under the impulse of intense sympathy at an agitating crisis, and to hearts that are filled with sorrow. Either St. John is an in imitable artist in his power of realising the feeling of the situation, or he is the true reporter of act ual words which fastened on his memory because they lived in his heart. My contention is that under the circumstances the defect of method is the perfectness of truth; that these adaptations of thought to feeling, these transitions from one topic to another, these recurrences to the same truths in different applications of them to the needs of the heart, are simply natural to the sit uation, and proper to the character of intercourse which it would produce. An orderly exposition of the truths delivered, a clear arrangement of the communications made (however convenient to the commentator or lecturer), could not have had 118 THE DISCOURSES chap. the same effect on the hearers at the time, and would have impaired the living impression which these communications make upon us now. We should have been placed in a different mental attitude, in which something might perhaps have been gained for the mind, but something would certainly have been lost for the heart. Such a manner of communication as this neces sarily obscures the method of it ; but the method is there, and under the varying movements of feeling we shall trace a continuous connexion of thought. The sense of this has grown upon the mind of the writer in the consecutive study of these discourses ; and he entertains the hope that in the mind of the reader a like effect may follow. 3. For a true apprehension of this teaching, one principle must be ever kept in view ; namely, its adaptation to the mental condition of the hearers at that crisis of their spiritual history. For them one great period is ending, and a different dispen sation will ensue. Under the past manifestation of Christ they have reached a level of faith, from which they must now rise to a greater elevation ; and the results of the past are either assumed, or claimed, as qualifying for the discoveries of the future. On the one side, we have such words as these, " Whither I go ye know, and the way ye know." — "Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me?" — "Believe i METHOD AND CHARACTER 119 me, that I am in the Father, and the Father in me ; or else believe me for the very work's sake." — " The world knoweth not the spirit of truth ; but ye know him." — "I am the vine ; ye are the branches." — " Now ye are clean through the word which I have, spoken to you." —"Ye have loved me and believed that I came forth from God." Throughout, their faith, love, and knowledge are counted as real ; and their union with their Lord and severance from the world are recognised as facts. Yet the imperfection of their attainments is also plain, evinced by their own poor questions and noted by sad reproofs. But, with these deduc tions, it is a real level of faith, no doubt attained more fully by some than by others. On the other hand, it is the aim of the Teacher to lift them above it, and prepare them for far higher gifts and experiences, proper to the day which is about to dawn. "In that day ye shall know," "In that day ye shall ask," in another way and with other effects than now. Then the departing will be found to be only a nearer coming, and the separation a closer union, and the seeing no more a true and constant beholding. Then another Paraclete will have come, with greater power and clearer discoveries and teach ings of all the truth, such as, at the time then present, they were not able to bear. Thus the 120 THE DISCOURSES chap. passage is prepared from faith begun in the flesh to faith made perfect in the Spirit, from the external to the internal manifestation of Christ, and from confused materials of thought and dim apprehensions of truth, to the full apostolic illumination. But the audience is larger than appears. In the foreground are the Eleven, behind them the universal Church. The words are addressed im mediately to the men then present, and meet the feelings of the moment as simply and naturally as if there were no thought beyond. Yet do they lay broad foundations of faith for all, and provide ¦ for manifold experiences in all generations. And this is not in the way of accidental consequence or ingenious application. It results necessarily from the personality of the Speaker and the char acter of the hearers. The Speaker is the Son of Man, acting in contingent circumstances, and conversing with individual persons, but embracing in the vastness of divine intention the whole race of mankind. Hence it is that a wonderful combination of the personal and immediate with the universal and perpetual distinguishes all the words of Jesus, and pre-eminently those wliich are here. It is a feature to be reckoned among the tokens of the true humanity and true divinity of Him who thus speaks : " Vox hominem sonat." It is a voice i METHOD AND CHARACTER 121 intensely human in its tones of sympathy and affection ; yet in revelation and authority no less distinctly divine. The hearers are men like ourselves, but they are representative men; dear to tlieir Lord iri their own persons, as his tender language shows ; pre cious also in his sight, as representing all "who shall believe on Him through their word." Those whom Jesus teaches have thereby an intermediary office. They are receivers, but also conductors, of the electric currents of truth. Testimonies and instructions, warnings and reproofs, consolations and promises, take hold of those who are addressed, but they pass on with unspent force, for they are spoken, not merely to Jews and Galileans, but to the world ; not merely to the Twelve, but to the Church. If this characteristic belongs to other communications, how much more to these, which are the last, which close the teaching in the flesh, which directly contemplate the day that is to fol low — that day which began when Jesus was glori fied, and which endures till He comes again. We know how, at its commencement, the words of promise were fulfilled to the commissioned teachers of the Church, for we have the development of Christian doctrine in their Epistles. We know that the main lines of faith and worship in the Church have their starting-point in these pregnant sayings, from the opening word, "Ye believe in 122 THE DISCOURSES chap. God, believe also in Me," to the last appointment of the name in which we are to pray. We know how naturally, in all ages, believing hearts have turned to these words in experiences which needed assurances most felt to be divine, in the saddest, the loftiest, the last hours of life. We know how instinctively the reader opens at these pages when there is special need of consolation and support, of detachment from the world, of the sense of the presence and love of Christ, and of the clearer sight of the Father's house beyond. And why is this? Certainly on account of the words them selves ; but also from the feelings awakened by the voice which utters them. It is the voice of Jesus prolonged through all ages, as fresh to-day in the congregation or the sick-chamber as it was then in the upper room in Jerusalem. These chap ters are like the late-invented instrument which can silently preserve and vocally give forth the very tones and accents of one who speaks on earth no more. THE FOUNDATION WORD 123 CHAPTER II THE FODNDATION WORD xiv. 1 We enter the 14th chapter and listen to the first discourse. It is a voice of consolation. It is a voice of revelation. The Lord reveals in order to console. There is no ground of consolation in the present. That can only be found in revelation of the future. But He consoles in order to reveal ; for the light which these parting words throw upon things to come, not only meets the needs of the occasion, but is meant to illuminate all ages of the Church. There is no change in the scene. All are still reclining at the table, prolonging the companion ship of the supper. The most forward speaker among the disciples is now silent, humbled and stricken to the heart. Others, while the Lord pro ceeds, can interpose as they will the questions which arise in their minds. These interpositions do not turn aside the drift of the discourse. They assist it, by expressing the feelings which the dis course intends to meet. All eyes are fixed on the 124 THE DISCOURSES chap. Speaker, watching for words which may relieve the sad perplexity. It is all so mysterious. Such strange, sad things have been spoken. Some ter rible event is at hand. One will betray ; another deny. A dark cold shadow is falling upon them. Is it the shadow of death? Anyhow, He is mak ing a farewell. He will go ; they know not whither ; but are told they cannot follow. Is the revelation of the Father closed? Is the world to be left unconvinced, and, as it would seem, vic torious? There is a confused sense of an aban doned work, an undertaking that fails, a history ending when it seemed about to begin. There is a dull feeling of inexplicable, inconceivable disap pointment. In fact, a few hours will render it overwhelming. It is not only a sad, but a danger ous time. Love is unchanged ; but faith begins to tremble. With full knowledge of all that is in their hearts, the Lord looks round on the perturbed and anxious countenances directed towards Him, waiting for explanation and relief. " Let not," He says, "your hearts be troubled; ye believe in God, believe also in me." The first sentence expresses desire to console; the second intimates intention to reveal. So is given the keynote to all that will follow. "Let not your heart be troubled" is the first word of the discourse. It will recur at the end. The reasons are supplied by the intervening n THE FOUNDATION WORD 125 words. " Troubled " is the best English equiva lent we can give for the Greek ; but as generally employed, its force is fainter. The verb Tapdo-o-a,,1 used often of the agitation of waters, the heaving and surging of the sea, aptly represents the deeper agitations of the soul, painful to strong natures, dangerous to the weak. Thrice it is used of our Lord Himself in some access of vehement emotion. So He shared the experiences Avhich in us He would comfort and control. Such a condition needs control, tending as it does to confusion of judgment and suspension of faith. " Let not your heart be troubled " was then not only a word of sympathetic kindness, but a needful counsel ; and it is so still, falling with composing power on many an agitated mind. " Troubled " we must be in the trying times of this changeful, sinful mortal life, but not as helpless victims of circum stances or feelings ; not as losing the higher con sciousness which should restore composure and minister support. This consciousness Jesus revives in his disciples by the claim He makes on their faith. He does more than revive it ; He augments it by a reveal ing word, — " Ye believe in God, believe also in me." Shall we read it thus, with the Authorized Ver- 1 Tapda-a-ui, commoveo, turbo, partibus rei hue illuc jactandis, pr. vSup, irbvTov, iriXayos, etc. (Grimm). 126 THE DISCOURSES chap. sion and the Revised Version ? or, with the mar gin and with most commentators, " Believe in God, believe also in me"? The form of the verb is both indicative and imperative. No one will adopt the Vulgate translation, which makes both clauses indicative. The second is beyond doubt a charge or exhortation. That is plain from the whole drift of the discourse, and is intimated by change in arrangement, " And in me believe." But what of the first clause? If the word "be lieve " be taken in a general sense, as in the case of a creed, the indicative will suit well, recognis ing that belief in God which is now to receive a definite completion. But if the word "believe," addressed to troubled minds, carries distinctly the sense of trust and confidence, it seems better to read both clauses as exhortation, " Believe in God and in me believe." Then faith in God and faith in Christ, though distinct, are one. In each case the same expres sion is employed, and the same character of faith intended. The word (irio-Teveiv et's J) is used by St. John of believing in the full sense of trust and 1 The phrase _.t), as distinctive iv SELF-REVELATION 141 of the teaching of Christ. It is not, I make the way ; I shew the truth ; I give the life : but all this I am. The first predicate not heard before gives the lesson now specially intended. The two others, already well-known words, preserve the fulness of the revelation. A way, taken by itself, as means to an end, might have no worth beyond that office, great as its worth in that sense might be ; but this case is not such. Jesus Christ is not a mere expedient for salvation. His inter vention is not that only of a revealer of truth and a conductor into life. He becomes the way, be cause He is absolutely the truth and the life in his own nature, and relatively to man by communica tions of Himself. Thus in the nature of things, and not only by economic arrangement or positive ordinance, He is for us " the way " to the Father, to the spiritual world, and to the heavenly home. This is the lesson here, as contained in the leading word and afterwards in the decisive exposition, " No man cometh unto the Father, but by Me." Two points may be noted. The coming is the act of man, a voluntary coming ; and it is a coming to God as the Father. We observe an advance in the teaching, from place to Person, from the Father's house to the Father Himself. The arri val at the house is now seen as the consequence and consummation of a previous coming to the Father. It is well said by Godet, — 142 THE DISCOURSES chap. " Ce n'est pas daus le ciel qu'on trouve Dieu ; C'est en Dieu qu'on trouve le ciel." (p. 467). The Christianity of Christ is intensely personal, in the sense of having directly to do with Persons. Heaven is not the end proposed, nor is a creed or method the way prescribed. The Father Himself is the end ; Jesus Himself is the way. He is the only way, — " No man cometh unto the Father, but by Me." But had not men come to God in the older time ? In reference to one in the earliest age of the world, it is argued, " He that cometh to God must believe that He is ; and that He is a re- warder of them that seek Him out" (Heb. xi. 6). Thus in faintest light of revelation, with most ele mentary instructions to faith, men came to God. Yes ! but this does not exclude mediating commu nications from the Eternal Word, nor does it affirm acceptance secured by other means than the pre destined work of " the Lamb slain from the foun dation of the world." Yet it is certain, that for him " that is least in the kingdom of heaven," there is a coming to the Father, different in char acter and effect from that which was attained before. Since the manifestation of Jesus Christ in the flesh, the sentence " No man cometh to the Father, but by Me " has received an explicit mean ing, to be met by a corresponding faith. What then is this coming (Sta) by or through Him ? Like other sayings of this pregnant teach- iv SELF-REVELATION 143 ing, it will unfold into fuller revelation. Hence interpretation may adopt separate truths and dif ferent lines of thought. One religious system will interpret " by fulfilling his precepts " ; another, " by likeness to his spirit " ; another, by reliance on his merits ; another, by faith in his blood. But every limited exposition falls short of the truth, which the Lord has comprehended in the single word " by Me." By the incarnation which creates the meeting point for man with God, by the human righteousness in which God is " well pleased," by the cross and passion which remove the barrier of sin, by the resurrection which raises man to a new position, by the gift of the spirit which is life towards God, by the perpetual efficacy and aid of the mediation in heaven, — by all these means and powers we have in Christ that " access " (717.00-- aycoyrj) to the Father of which the Apostolic writ ings so largely speak. There it is the constant description of the Christian state, that "through Him we have had our access by faith into this grace wherein we stand " (Rom. v. 2) ; that "through Him we have our access in one Spirit unto the Father " (Eph. ii. 18) ; that " in Him we have boldness and access in confidence through our faith in Him " (iii. 15) ; that we " are made nigh in the blood of Christ " (ii. 13) ; that we have boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus, by the way which He dedicated for us, a 144 THE DISCOURSES chap. new and living way, through the veil — that is to say, his flesh, and having (in Him) a great priest over the house of God (Heb. x. 19-21), and finally that, as ever living and interceding, " He is able to save to the uttermost those that come unto God through Him" (vii. 25). In these and many like expressions, or rather in the entire Apostolic Gospel, we recognise the expansion of the words " I am the way. No man cometh unto the Father, but by Me." Though these truths will all unfold when " Jesus is glorified," yet the first communication and con ception of them belongs to the time of his mani festation in the flesh. Knowledge received then must be the foundation of knowledge which will ensue. It had been received; but how imper fectly ! how unintelligently ! The defect must be exposed and reproved. The knowledge must be made conscious. It must be put into words ; and a divine certainty given to it at this crisis of the teaching. Therefore the Lord proceeds : — " If ye had known me, ye would have known my Father also : from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him. Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you,- and dost thou not know me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; how sayest thou, Shew us the Father? Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me ? The words that I say unto you I speak not from myself ; but the Father abiding in me doeth iv SELF-REVELATION 145 his works. Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me ; or else believe me for the very works' sake " (7-11). Not now for the first time are such words spoken. Others like them had been heard by the disciples in the public pronouncements of their Lord. Does He now say to them, "If ye had known Me, ye would have known my Father also " ? So had He said to the Jews, " Ye know neither Me nor my Father ; if ye knew Me, ye would know my Father also" (viii. 19). Does He now say, "He that has seen Me hath seen the Father " ? So had He said before, " He that believeth on Me believeth on Him that sent Me ; and he that beholdeth Me beholdeth Him that sent Me " (xii. 44, 45). Does He say, " The words that I say unto you I speak not from Myself: but the Father abiding in Me doeth his works " ? So had He said, " I spake not from Myself. . . . The things which I speak, even as the Father said unto Me, so I speak " (xii. 49, 50). Does He say, "Believe Me that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me ; or else believe Me for the very works' sake " ? The same grounds for the same belief had been urged before. "If I do not the works of my Father, believe Me not. But if I do them, though ye believe not Me, be lieve the works ; that ye may know and understand that the Father is in Me, and I in the Father" (x. 37, 38). No ! there is nothing new in these K 146 THE DISCOURSES chap. profound announcements and fundamental truths. On these, what is now spoken to disciples had been first addressed to the world. It is always so. Men become believers and disciples not in response to an esoteric teaching privately imparted, but by reception of the common doctrine published to all. To them, the difference is in the confiding tone of the communications which ensue, and in the fur ther development of the truths they have received. So in regard to these sayings : to the Jews the message is closed; to the disciples it is opened out. In the words " If ye had known Me, ye would have known my Father also," according to the cor rected reading (et eyvco/cetre fie, Kai tov irarepa fiov dv rj.etTe) there is a discrimination in the character of the knowledge by use of two different verbs ; the first representing a knowledge acquired and pro gressive ; the second, a knowledge perceptive and immediate. If the disciples had learned to know Jesus, as they should have known Him, that would have involved a perception of the Divine, a sense of God in Him. The failure is worthy of sad reproof, but it is not of such a kind as should close the message. On the contrary, their measure of attainment is assumed, and what it misses is now to be given. "From now (a7r' dprt, ytvmaKeTe) ye know (are knowing or coming to know) Him and have seen iv SELF-REVELATION 147 Him." That last word, "have seen," evokes an appeal which otherwise had scarcely been uttered, — " Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us." Some discovery of the Invisible, otherwise than by spoken word, has been intimated. Indeed, it seems wanted. Like Moses, when he urged a like request, " I beseech Thee shew me thy glory," they felt that their faith needed some supernatural confirmation ; one which would preclude doubt and satisfy long ing ; one of which they could say, "It sufficeth us." Like thoughts have wrought in many a heart, with a secret feeling, that, for the faith demanded, what is given does not suffice. That was the meaning of the Jews when they required a sign from heaven. It is the same plea, but not in the same spirit. There it was in the scorn of unbelief, here it is in the anxiety of unenlightened faith. It must be shewn that what has been given seems not suffi cient, only because it has not been understood. Philip, the first disciple in the second rank, is here the spokesman for the rest. The answer is a grave and tender remonstrance, passing into a dis tinct and sublime assertion. Through the whole time that their Lord has been with them, the dis covery asked for had been going on. "He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father." The Person with whom they had companied, his life, his words, his works, which they had witnessed, had been the true answers to their request, indeed, the only pos- 148 THE DISCOURSES chap. sible answers. " The heavens declare the glory of God " ; but the higher glory of his nature, in what (for want of a better word) we call his moral attri butes, cannot be manifested in material works. Holiness, grace, and truth can only appear in a person, a character, a life. These came by Jesus Christ. " No man hath seen God at any time ; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, He hath declared Him " (John i. 17, 18). The discovery has been made, the indwelling Deity had shone before their eyes, the Father had been manifested in the Son ; but as yet only dimly descried by eyes which had been holden. The truth must be made plain. "How sayest thou, Shew us the Father? Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me? The words that I say unto you I speak not from Myself ; but the Father abiding in Me, He doeth his works. Believe Me, that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me." Here we reach the central truth, on which all else depends; twice affirmed here, and soon repeated in the final Prayer: "Thou, Father, art in Me, and I in Thee " (xvii. 23). All that is passing is to be read as a history, not of God and Christ, but of God in Christ. That is the character claimed for all the words and works. That is the charac ter recognised afterwards in the one great work, in which all the rest is comprehended; God was ¦iv •• SELF-REVELATION 149 in Christ reconciling the world unto Himself" (2 Cor. v. 19). The secret of all is in the mys tery of the mutual indwelling, in the harmony of action, mind, and will, resting on the essential unity of nature. This involves the truth of, "I am the way ; no man cometh unto the Father, but by Me." This explains the charge, "Ye believe in God; believe also in Me." The foundation doctrine of the discourse, and of Christianity itself, is now complete. But there is in this self-revelation a mystery, as well as a majesty, which may claim a stronger assurance than usual. That Jesus could sym pathise with the hesitations of faith is evinced by the form of his present testimony, which adds to an appeal for confidence the suggestion of an argument in reserve. In so speaking, He has thrown light on a question of no little moment. A great demand is made on faith. What are the grounds on which the claim is rested? Two are indicated, "Believe Me (that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me), or else believe Me for the very works' sake." The same distinction of reasons for faith, and for faith in the same doctrine, had been made in discussion with the Jews. " If ye believe not Me, believe the works " (x. 38). The first ground for believing the asser tion made is in the person who makes it ; the second, in the works which support it. The first 150 THE DISCOURSES chap. appears as the primary claim; the second as sup plementary or alternative : supplementary in the case of disciples under the power of the personal impression; alternative in the case of the Jews who fail to feel it. These sayings of the Lord seem to give his own estimate of the "evidences of Christianity," a question which has been much debated, and on wliich different views are taken by minds of dif ferent habits. According to the first view, Jesus Christ is his own evidence, by the force of his unique personality, and by the impression which it makes on the soul. According to the second, He gives the evidence by works above natural power, and by the conclusions which reason must draw. The effect of the one evidence is heard in the cry of the first disciples, who as yet had seen no miracle : " We have found the Messias " ; " Thou art the Son of God, thou art the King of Israel " (i. 41-48). The effect of the other is heard in the acknowledgment of the candid Pharisee : " We know that thou art a teacher come from God; for no man can do these signs that thou doest except God be with him " (iii. 2). The conclusion in the one case is from intuitive perception and spiritual sympathy ; in the other, from deliberate observation and logical reasoning. The one is a more intimate conviction, and generates a higher faith ; the other is more capable of verbal exposi- iv SELF-REVELATION 151 tion and defence. These two kinds of evidence have had with us an alternate influence. To a generation suspicious of feeling and enthusiasm, and trustful in the understanding alone, miracles became the ideal evidence. Now, a generation, impressed with the fixity of physical laws, and appreciative of psychological considerations, is disposed to slight the supernatural, and insist only upon the moral evidence. But can the two be severed ? or the one dispense with the other ? Is there not a natural correspondence between the Person and the works, the impression and the signs which confirm it ? In these sayings of Jesus, both kinds of evidence are combined and placed in their relative positions. Thus man is appealed to on the whole ; and the recognition by one part of his nature is sustained by the conclusions of the other. The witness within is of such a character as to expect the witness from without; and the witness without answers its end only by generating the witness within. Thus, to believe the testi mony of Jesus concerning Himself for his own sake, or to believe it for the works' sake, are processes which in some sort include each other, and in their combined effect create the full con fidence of faith. Yet, with a true disciple, the evidence of works is only a subsidiary aid; it is knowledge of Jesus in Himself which inspires an assured faith in his highest self-revelations. 152 THE DISCOURSES CHAPTER V THE PROMISE OF POWER v. 12-14 The works have been alleged as evidence for the faith which has been claimed. It is now de clared that this evidence is not closed, and that there is another course of it to come. In saying this the discourse enters on the next stage of the history, and opens the dispensation of the future. This transition is an instance, not of any confu sion of topics, but of consecutive order. When the object of faith has been clearly presented, the life of faith is to be unfolded ; and the brief decisive exposition of what is to be believed concerning Jesus leads to the information of what is to be expected from Him. The transition is marked by the Amen, Amen, which usually intimates such an advance in divine disclosures as may need ratifica tion, on account either of its greatness or of its strangeness to previous thought. So it stands here, not only in connexion with the words imme diately following, but as bearing on all the rest of the discourse. v THE PROMISE OF POWER 153 " Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also ; and greater works than these shall he do ; because I go unto the Father. And what soever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If ye shall ask (me) anything in my name, that will I do " (12-14). We are now carried beyond the dividing line of the departure into the experiences which will ensue for the disciples, and so into the history of the Church. The action of Jesus in person is ex changed for that of the believer in Him, yet the continuity of the history is preserved : " The works which I do, shall he do also " ; but it is a continuity of advance, " greater works than these shall he do." The Author of them is also the same, for the intermediate agent becomes such only as a believer in Him and by prayer in his name ; and " he will do " (irotrjo-ei), and, " I will do " (iroir/aoi^), are expressed by the same verb. Also the works are greater, as a consequence of the exaltation of their Author, "because I go to the Father." Thereby the fountain of power for the Church is opened at the throne of God, and the resources of heaven are pledged to the applications of faith and prayer. Finally all is directed to one end, " That the Father may be glorified in the Son." Thus in pregnant words and brief outline the dispensation of the future is described : its conti nuity with the preceding history, its greater ele- 154 THE DISCOURSES chap. vation and expansion, its author and governor, its ministers and agents, its means and methods, the secret of its power, its intent and end. Soon will the disciples prove the truth of this account which now they can but very faintly ap prehend. As believers in the risen and ascended Lord, they will do such works as He did on earth, so far and so long as there is just occasion for them, but they will find that occasion superseded by the greater works to which these will conduce. The few scores of adherents whom the ministry of Jesus had attracted will become the many thou sands of believers whom the Apostles will gather. The fabric of the Church will rise under their hands, and spiritual life will follow on their word. In all this they will know no power but that of their ascended Lord, and no means of success but prayer in his name. They will count that it is He who works all things by them, and will seek no end lower than this, " that God in all things may be glorified through Jesus Christ " (1 Pet. iv. 11). Having their acts and their writings under the dispensation which is here announced, we can see how the facts fulfilled the promises. As yet they understood not these things, but in hearing the words they must have felt that there were rising before them new sources of comfort and new pros pects of hope. Among the elements of the future, which this v THE PROMISE OF POWER 155 passage contains, is the special feature and distinc tive characteristic of Christian prayer; namely, the asking in the name of Jesus. Not possible during the companionship in the flesh, it is now heard for the first time, being implied in the higher faith which has just been taught, and proper to the dispensation which is at hand. Twice is it repeated here, once in respect of "whatsoever ye shall ask the Father," once on the supposition, " if ye shall ask Me " ; the last word being an uncertain but probable reading. If adopted, it conveys an admitted truth, illustrated by the earliest examples of Christian prayer (Acts i. 124 ; vii. 59, 66), by the language of the Apos tolic writings, and frequent in the devotions of the Church. But direct address to the glorified Son of Man is (as in our Liturgy) occasional. Prayer in his name is a perpetual act, an abiding consciousness and intention. "Through Jesus Christ our Lord " sounds through all worship, in all churches, and all ages. It is no mystery. Re quests made in the name of another are under stood to imply the appropriation to one's self of his claims, his merits, his rights to be heard. Such appropriation and the admission of it can only rest on close relationship and definite author isation. Both these exist in the present case: relationship, in that we appear before God as mem bers of Christ; authorisation, in his own ordi- 156 THE DISCOURSES chap. nance expressed in other places, and first in this. The phrase, " ask in my name," occurs five times afterwards in these discourses, and at the close as a final charge reiterated and emphatic (xvi. 24, 26). Thus was given to the Church not a mere devo tional form, but a new ground on which the wor shipper stands ; a new plea for the success of his petitions ; and, in fact, a wholly new character to prayer, since it must be brought into unison with the mind of Him in whose. name it is presented. How welcome is this charge ! how suited to all our need! Certainly it is a positive ordinance, but is felt as a moral necessity ; in view, on the one side, of the disabilities of sin, and on the other, of the relations of the believer with his Saviour. The most elementary prayer, if true at all, finds in this ordinance comfort and relief ; and in pro portion as knowledge of sin grows deeper, and approaches to God are more close, and as emer gencies of spiritual life multiply, and its capacities and desires enlarge, in that proportion is there an increasing power and sweetness in this use of the prevailing name. So all liturgies and public de votions, all private prayers and supplications, all secret communion with God, and unuttered breath ings of the soul, have derived their tone and life from this ordinance of the central chapter of the Gospel. THE PROMISE OF THE PARACLETE 157 CHAPTER VI THE PROMISE OF THE PARACLETE v. 15-24 The words of promise thus given, important as they were, yet did not meet the case. They did not afford the consolation needed by those troubled souls. A prospect of works to be done, and gifts to be supplied for doing them, did not take ac count of the real distress, or answer the desolate feelings of the moment. The departure, which is at hand, means indefinite separation with the loss of the dear presence in which they have lived, and of the companionship which has been their guid ance and support. It means also the disappoint ment of tlieir just expectation that their Lord was about to be manifested to the world. These are the thoughts which amaze and depress their hearts ; and to meet these thoughts, the rest of the discourse is directed. Addressed, as it is, to the feelings of the men at the moment, it remains a revelation of enduring truth, and is still for us a divine interpretation of the dispensation under wliich we live. 158 THE DISCOURSES chap. It is best, I think, to read as one section the promises which respond to these desolations of the heart, and which substitute for the experiences of separation and loneliness the hope of another Comforter, another advent, a more intimate asso ciation, and a more elevating manifestation. " If ye love me, ye will keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Com forter, that he may be with you for ever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive ; because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him; ye know him, for he abideth with you, and shall be in you. I will not leave you deso late ; I will come to you. Yet a little while, and the world beholdeth me no more, but ye behold me ; because I live, ye shall live also. In that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you. He that hath my com mandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me ; and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him. "Judas- (not Iscariot) saith unto him, Lord, what is come to pass that thou wilt manifest thyself to us, and not unto the world ? Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my word : and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him. He that loveth me not keepeth not my words; and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me " (15-24). Before the promises there is a proviso. It is premised that there is a state of heart and a char acter of life to which they belong. As the works vi THE PROMISE OF THE PARACLETE 159 and the gifts of power were made dependent on faith and prayer, so the experiences now foretold presuppose the life of love and duty. This appro priation is laid down to begin with, and is insisted on more largely as the promises unfold. The pref erable reading, " If ye love Me, ye will keep my commandments," gives the future instead of the imperative of the Authorized Version, rather de scribing a process than imposing a condition ; but the meaning is the same ; namely, that these are promises which belong only to him who loves and obeys. In " If ye love Me " we hear a confiding rather than a doubtful tone. The love is supposed, as elsewhere it is expressly recognised (xvi. 17). But it proves true love only in one way, " If ye love Me, ye will keep my commandments " ; and again, "He that hath my commandments and keepeth them, he it is that loveth Me." There is a voice of divine authority in the phrase, " my commandments " ( t<_? evroXdi ra? ./-a., the com mandments which are mine). They claim obedi ence, but the obedience of love; and love will render it. Love is the spring of action, and is in its nature free; but it is not left to its own impulses; it acknowledges authority; it is placed under rule, and includes the element of obliga tion. This connexion of love and commandment dwelt on the mind of the Evangelist, and reap pears more than once in his Epistle. It is not 160 THE DISCOURSES chap. according to the tendencies of human nature, as we all know; and as St. Paul has set forth in the seventh chapter to the Romans in recording his experience of the law and its effects. It is, in fact, distinctive of Christian duty and of the morality of the G-ospel. In Christ the claims of authority and the affections of the heart agree in one. Here, as ever, the teaching of Jesus fixes our minds on the practical side of religion ; on the doing what we know, on the living and walking by his words. In this present teaching, which is, in its intention, a ministry of promise, opening out the higher blessings of the state of grace, He still provides that it shall not even seem to be dissoci ated from the ministry of commandment. How can we better respond to it than in the words of the collect, fitted for habitual use ? asking of Him " who alone can order the unruly wills and affec tions of sinful men," that He will "grant to his people to love the thing which He commandeth, and to desire that which He doth promise, that so, among the sundry and manifold changes of the world, our hearts may surely there be fixed where true joys are to be found." Now we enter on the promises, the special prom ises which are in Christ, addressed, as we have seen, to the faith which believes in Him, the love vi THE PROMISE OF THE PARACLETE 161 which adheres to Him, the obedience which keeps his words ; and now first we hear the promise, inclusive of the rest, and distinctive of the New Covenant — that of the Holy Ghost, the Com forter. Had it not been heard before? Never as it is now. Yet was it the first announcement, when Jesus entered on the scene of action, " On whom thou shalt see the Spirit, descending and remain ing on Him, the same is He which baptiseth with the Holy Ghost" (i. 33). On Him the Spirit remained; but that He baptised with the Holy Ghost does not appear, at least by any phenomena which made it evident, or by any consciousness of it, which is expressed by disciples. If we ex cept the promise that, when needful for their testi mony, the Spirit of their Father will speak by them ; and the statement to Nicodemus that the new birth is " of the Spirit " ; and the phrase, " your Father, which is in heaven, shall give the Holy Spirit to them that ask Him," the equivalent in St. Luke (xi. 13); for "shall give good things" (Matt. vii. 1), it is observable that, in the teaching of Jesus in the flesh, the doctrine of the Holy Ghost is conspicuous by its absence, or, if present, is veiled in parable and prediction. For this marked reserve concerning it, St. John has given the rea son, when afterwards, writing in the dispensation of the Spirit, he interprets the words concerning 162 THE DISCOURSES chap. the " living water." " This spake He of the Spirit, which they that believed on Him were to receive ; for the Spirit was not yet ; because Jesus was not yet glorified." The reason given for the reserve supplied the reason for terminating it, in the teach ing which now expounds the situation which is to follow after that great change shall have occurred. Then, it is said, " I will pray the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter, that He may be with you for ever — the Spirit of truth." When the work on earth is finished, by request made in the glory that follows, the gift is to be obtained and bestowed. Three expressions are used here, " I will ask — and He will give " ; again, " Whom the Father will send in my name " (vi. 26) ; and yet again, " Whom I will send to you from the Father " (xv. 26, xvi. 7). Thus the gift is ascribed to God in Christ, to Christ in God, while the personality attributed to Him who is sent involves a revela tion of the Trinity. But the word " Parac le te " is also a revelation in respect of his relations with the spirit and life of man. In form it describes one called to the side of another; in intention it expresses the purpose for which he is come, the friendly office which he there fulfils. Many are the emergencies of human life, and many are the forms of help which they require, and all are included in this great compre hensive name. If we wish to distinguish, we may vi . THE PROMISE OF THE PARACLETE 163 range them in two divisions, the advocacy of our cause before others, the support of companionship' to ourselves. When we think of the one office,' we speak of an advocate ; when of the other, of a comforter. But the same person will fulfil either office as need requires ; and both are included in the word " Paraclete." Therefore the choice of the English equivalent in any particular case may be dictated by the nature of the occasion and the general feeling of the situation. If so, the Revis ers have done well in retaining the old rendering " the Comforter " in the four passages in which " Paraclete " here occurs, as they were plainly right in retaining that of " Advocate " in the only other passage where it is found (1 John ii. 1). The situation presented in the Gospel more natu rally suggests the first rendering, while that con templated in the Epistle certainly prescribes the second. Here " another Paraclete " is promised in tenderest sympathy with the actual feelings of the men now about to lose that companionship of their Master which had been their life, their strength, and their stay. When He says " another Paraclete " He takes the title as descriptive of what they knew He had been to them, while He had gone out and come in among them. That experience interprets the meaning of the promise. We must read the word " Comforter " in its true and old English sense, not in the lower and feebler 164 THE DISCOURSES chap. meaning which it mostly carries now.1 It speaks of strength, support, encouragement, given to the life of thought and action, still more than of con solation in trial or sorrow. Yes ! it was a word to cheer and strengthen men about to be launched on the experiences of a new life, of an arduous work, and of conflict with a hostile world. In their conscious weakness and dimness of mind they will need a fellowship with strength and light ; and they shall have it; they shall, not be left alone. The old association ends, but a new association is to suc ceed, one habitual and permanent, with no limit to its continuance, in that respect contrasted with that which has lasted so few years and has reached the parting hour. The promise is for all genera tions of believers and to the end of time He " shall be with you (et _ tov al&va) for ever." Who, then, is this companion of the future, this eternal Paraclete? "Even the Spirit of truth." The attribute of truth, thus chosen to characterise the Spirit and the Spirit's work, at once connects the gift with the deepest needs of man and the 1 Comfort : Fr. conforter ; ecclesiastical Latin, conforto (from fortis ' strong '), properly ' to strengthen.' — Aldis Wright's "Bible Word Book," pp. 146, 147. Examples are givenfromthe Old Testament, from legal documents and treaties, from Shake speare and Bacon, and two curious instances, one from Wiclif , who renders (Is. xii. 7), " he comforteth hym with nailes, that it sha not be moved". — and another from the earlier version which gives for Phil. iv. 13, " I may alle things in him that com forteth me." vi THE PROMISE OF THE PARACLETE 165 highest purposes of God. It places the history to come in line with that which is past, the work of the Spirit with that of Jesus in the flesh. " For this end (He said), was I born, and for this cause came I unto the world, that I might bear witness to the truth" (xviii. 37). It corresponds with the Apostolic calling of those who are to be deposita ries, witnesses, and preachers of the truth amid the ignorance, errors, and falsehoods of the world. Their testimony now will not be the mere outcome of their personal apprehensions ; it will be " the Spirit that beareth witness because the Spirit is the truth " (1 John v. 7) ; and He is so in a fuller sense than the truest word can be.1 Thus a neces sary adaptation as well as a vast resource is con tained in the name " the Spirit of truth." But to the world the Spirit is unreal, only a metaphysical expression, or a poetic fiction. It "cannot receive Him, because it beholdeth Him not " in the visible sense, " neither knoweth Him " by intellectual process. In it the preparatory ap prehensions and sympathetic affinities are wanting. But they are not wanting in the little company 1 ' ' L'enseignement des choses divines par le moyen de la parole ne peut jamais nous en donner qu'une id6e confuse : quelque habilement que soit employe ce moyen de communication, il ne peut produire dans l'ame de I'auditeur qu'une image de la v6rit6. L'enseignement de I'Esprit, au contraire, fait penetret la ventfi clans l'Sme : il lui donne ainsi pleine realit. au dedans de nous, et en fait pour nous la v6rit6 " (Godet, ii. 177). 166 THE DISCOURSES chap. which surrounds the person of Jesus. Besides the impression made by his words and works, there was an indefinable sense of the Spirit which abode upon Him. Therein was a mystery beyond their knowledge. The human nature in Christ, not only derived from conjunction with Deity all such perfections as it was itself apt to receive, but from his baptism it was also anointed with such a superadded gift of the Spirit as was proper for the purposes of his manifestation.1 Hence the disci ples had felt in the presence of their Lord the character and action of the Spirit that was in Him, so that it could be said to them, " Ye know Him, for He dwelleth with you," or, more literally, " is abiding (irapa) beside you." Now it is added, " and shall be in you." That is a great advance. The same Spirit which was in j Christ, which in his Deity was one with Him, and | in his humanity rested upon Him, was in the ^coming time to be in them, no longer only telling /on them as an influence from without, but, as ; Paraclete, dwelling and working within, in asso- | ciation with their own spirit. The faith in this promise and the experience of its fulfilment breathe, as we know, through all the apostolic writings, making them a continual expression of " the communion of the Holy Ghost." Great was the promise ; but could it be accepted 1 Hooker, B. v. ch. 54. vi THE PROMISE OF THE PARACLETE 167 as a substitute for the presence and fellowship of the Lord Himself? Never, by any heart that loved Him. That would mean bereavement and desolation. Nor is it an exchange which his own love could propose. The promise is not of a sub stitution which excludes, but of a means which secures, his presence. " I will not leave you deso late " (opcpavovs, orphans, now one of the most touching of English words). "_T come to you." Does the Spirit of Christ enter the soul ? Then it is Christ who enters. That is a true coming, and a real communion. But it must be so on both sides. On his part it is pledged ; but how will it be on theirs ? What will be their consciousness, their perceptions, their understanding of this fact? The question is an ticipated. Yes ! they shall see, they shall know, they shall have the experience of manifestation and the sense of fellowship. It is true He must disappear. " Yet a little while, and the world beholdeth Me no more." (He has walked in the sight of men, and has been observed with superficial wonder. But that mani festation has reached its end. That kind of be holding, the only kind of which the world was capable, can be no more.) " But ye behold Me " (./tet? _e Oetopelre /u.e). They have already another faculty of sight which will grow clearer yet. Still will their Master remain before their minds as 168 THE DISCOURSES chap. the great object of faith, and fill the field of vision. To the world He will be a name in history ; to them, a living presence, and one from which their own life will be derived. "Because I live, ye shall live also." What a security is this ! What a charter to hold by ! What a life in which to partake ! Fully were these brief sentences un folded in the after-experience of the Church. They may even be said to be an epitome of the Epistles. There the believer has ever in full view the living Lord, and finds in his life the source and supplies of his own, a Christ who lives in him, in whom he lives, and with whom he shall live for ever. It is of the experience of that time that Jesus is speaking here. In that day (the day when He is gone, and the Spirit given), "in that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in Me, and I in you." He had said before to Philip, " Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me?" for that truth might have been, and ought to have been, already believed. But the knowledge now spoken of belonged only to " that day," future then, but present soon and now. Then was consummated the scheme for union of man with God, through Christ in heaven abiding in his Father, and on earth abiding in his people, as they also in Him. Of that mutual in dwelling He will soon speak again (xvi. 4-7) ; but vi THE PROMISE OF THE PARACLETE 169 here He says it shall be known. And so it is ; as we oft record in the act which renews and seals this union, humbly adopting these words of his, and saying, " Then we dwell in Christ, and Christ in us ; we are one with Christ, and Christ with us." Plaving thus revealed the powers of spiritual life, the Lord reverts to the qualifications for it. He had begun with, " If ye love Me, ye will keep my commandments " ; He ends with, " He that hath my commandments and keepeth them, he it is that loveth Me." The great promise is enclosed between these two sayings, the first presenting love as the spring of obedience ; the second, obe dience as the proof of love. So carefully has He marked the appropriation of the gift to those only who are capable of receiving it. Love, true practical love, constitutes the qualifi cation; but it is more than a qualification. We must regard it in its atmosphere of happiness created by divine reciprocity, " He that loveth Me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest Myself to him." The assertion is that, where such love to Christ exists, there a greater love is in action on the other side, the love of the Father to one who loves the Son, and the love of the Son as Friend and Saviour, making the confidences and discoveries which are proper to the nature of love (Kai eficpavlaoi aiiTa i/iav- 170 THE DISCOURSES chap. to'.). "I will manifest Myself to him," disclose to him what I am myself and what I am to him.1 Here the subject has been brought to a close, and the consoling promise is completed. But there is an anxiety in the minds of the disciples which the words have not met, nay, which they seem to set aside. One who, we may suppose, felt it most, Judas (not the Iscariot who had gone out into the night) Thaddeus, takes occasion from the last word to utter the thought of his heart. "Lord," he says, "what is come to pass that to us Thou art about to manifest Thyself and not unto the world?" All that has been said has been of an interior revelation to themselves ; but what then of public discovery and manifestation to the world ? Shall not the unbelieving world be made to own the truth of the Lord's mission, and to acknowledge his rights and glory? The words have even seemed to disallow that hope. The Paraclete will come to them, but the world will not know Him ; their Lord will be seen by them, but the world will not behold Him ; He will mani fest Himself, but only to those who love Him. 1 The verb ./i^aWfw is not the ordinary and frequent word which is rendered by "manifest." It is used five times in the Acts (xxii. 15 ; xxiii. 22 ; xxiv. 1 ; xxv. 2 and 15) of disclos ures made or information given ; also in the passive voice, of special "appearings" (Matt, xxvii. 53; Heb. xxiv.). vi THE PROMISE OF THE PARACLETE 171 What has happened (rt yeyovev\) to change the expected course of things? It was a natural ques tion. False and true Messianic hopes were min gled in the hearts of the disciples, and the end to which they had thought they were approaching seemed now to be vanishing from their sight. There was a tone of the false idea and of the very spirit of the world in the anxious question of Judas. The same spirit had spoken more plainly in the brethren of the Lord (vii. 3, 4), " If Thou do these things, shew Thyself to the world." We understand these feelings ; they are common to man ; never more so than now. " Shew Thyself to the world" may stand as the motto of our time. The world, the multitude, numbers, a "great work," a theatre of action, popular applause, acknowledged success, publicity, advertisement of self and proclamation on the housetops, — these are reigning ideas; they infect religion and the Church; they alloy the motives, and deteriorate the character of Christian service; and they im pair the interest in that interior life to which the preceding promises belong. The prevalent Mes sianic idea was instinct with this worldly spirit, and it had not yet been wholly banished from the hearts of the disciples. There was indeed to be a manifestation and conquest and success, but not of the kind they dreamed of. It was not now the time to explain, and the present teaching was in 172 THE DISCOURSES another region of thought. " Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love Me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and We will come unto him and make our abode with him. He that loveth Me not keepeth not my words." Was this an answer? Yes, in the truest sense: an implied answer to the question ; a direct answer to the feeling which it betrayed ; calling back the mind from a side issue and a misleading line of thought, and giving to the truth, which seemed to have been slighted, a fresh confirmation and more touching form. It is a truth not for the world, but for the man ; for him who " keeps the word of Christ " (not the words, but the word as a whole), and it contemplates not a public discovery of power, but a sort of domestic visitation of love. The language combines a homely tone with its grand and gracious meaning. "We will come unto him." Who is this that, uniting Himself with the Eternal, speaks of what " We will " do ? And who are these Guests who come to a poor man's door (and all are poor before Them), and come to enter in, and that not to visit, but to stay? "We will make our abode with him" (/iovtjv irap' avroj irotTjadfiev). The same word is employed which had been used before of the abid ing-places, or "mansions," in the Father's house. It describes a settled habit and habitation, and breathes of the atmosphere of home. By him vi THE PROMISE OF THE PARACLETE 173 who " kept the word," the promise was felt as ful filled. Long afterwards St. John wrote to "the elect lady," "He that abideth in the doctrine, he hath both the Father and the Son " (2 John 9). A concluding word glances at the opposite case, " He that loveth Me not keepeth not my words." So the world is excluded, and the hearer warned. To all is added the seal of the oft-repeated affirma tion, " And the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent Me." 174 THE DISCOURSES CHAPTER VII PROMISE OF TEACHING v. 25, 26 " The word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent Me." Has that word reached its end, and is his teaching now to cease ? It would seem so, since these are the last hours of intercourse, and He is going where his disciples cannot come. Had He then said all that He had to say? was his teaching then complete? Was the word delivered in the days of his flesh the whole word that was really his ? That would be a great question for the Church afterwards ; it was a great question for the disciples then. To them He had been the Teacher (6 StSao-/.a\o.); that was the relation in which they had known Him. And they had been his disciples indeed; his words had entered into their souls. "To whom," they said, " shall we go ? Thou hast words of eternal life." Yet had they apprehended those words imperfectly ; and their education was still in an early stage. Much that they had heard was in their minds undefined and incoherent, vii PROMISE OF TEACHING 175 rather the materials than the forms of thought, and much would even pass from remembrance, if not fixed by a more clear intelligence. The defect of that intelligence had been shown by their ques tions at this very time ; and the great words of revelation to which they had been listening must have made them feel more deeply than ever the need of further teaching. The assurance that they were to have it is an essential point in this discourse of consolation. " These things have I spoken unto you, while yet abiding with you. But the Comforter, even the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I have said unto you" (25, 26). This declaration is explicit. The teaching which Jesus came to give was not yet completed, and was not to end with his sojourn upon earth. By " these things I have spoken to you," He intends all the lessons of the past ; and by " while abiding with you" (Trap1 vfilv p.eva>v) He implies that this abiding will be no more. But the teaching is not over ; it will be continued by the Paraclete, who is to be sent in " his name," as his representative, to carry on his lessons, and to recall and interpret his words. Also, as has been said, the Spirit is the same, who in the person, words, and works of Jesus has been already present in the earlier stage of teaching. Now He is described by the name which 176 THE DISCOURSES chap. the Church adopts and celebrates for ever, "the Holy Spirit," or (shall we say?) the Holy Ghost. Why break the living threads of language which connect our faith with that of our own forefathers ? If scholars read, " the Holy Spirit, the Advocate," let the people still say, "the Holy Ghost, the Comforter." It is no mere power or influence which is expressed in that name ; and in this place the personality of the Spirit is emphasised when the neutral form of the word irvevfia changes, in the pronoun " He " (./.etz/o?), into masculine form and personal sense. But that is only noticeable as being the expression of a truth implied through out. So Stier has said. " Is not the personal, official name, in equality with the person of Jesus, in itself decisive ? He who can regard all the there with connected personal expressions (of teaching, reminding, testifying, coming, convincing, guiding, speaking, hearing, prophesying, taking) in these three chapters as being no other than a long-drawn- out figure, deserves not to be recognised even as an interpreter of intelligible words, much less an expounder of Holy Scripture." This clear enun ciation of the doctrine of the Holy Ghost in respect of nature and office is one chief feature which marks the central character of all this teaching; for the revelation itself is central, both in the his tory of the Gospel and as an article of the Creed, standing in the latter as well as in the former vii PROMISE OF TEACHING 177 between the manifestation of Christ on the one side, and the life of the Church on the other. The office of teacher, here (and afterwards) assigned to the Spirit, is part of his office of Com forter. To the awakened mind, to the anxious soul, comfort, in its true sense, can only come through teaching. It is the truth alone which will satisfy ; it is the word which must strengthen, gladden, and support. The promise here describes this teaching (1) in its general character, (2) in its special method (BtSd^et, Kai virofivrjo-et). It is a general promise, and a large one. " He shall teach you all things " ; all that is, for which divine teaching is needed, " all that is to be known for salvation and life eternal " (Stier), or, as is after wards more distinctly expressed, all the truth (xvi. 13). It was a needful promise to those who were themselves to be teachers of the world. The sub jects of this teaching will appear more particularly in the next discourse. In this, for the purpose of consolation and assurance, the general promise is sufficient. But this future teaching is not to be severed from that which preceded it. It is the continua tion of the personal teaching of Jesus ; and its first office is to recall, perpetuate, and interpret the words of his lips : " He shall teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said unto you." The things that Jesus said M 178 THE DISCOURSES chap. are for ever the firm grounds of our faith, and the germinant principles of Christian thought, and there is nothing developed in the second stage of divine teaching which has not its root and sub stance in the first. Every doctrine expanded in the Epistles roots itself in some pregnant saying in the Gospels ; and the original intimation of every truth opened by the Spirit to the Apostles came to them first from the lips of the Son of Man. The later revelation may enlarge the earlier, may dis cover its fulness, or define its applications ; but the earlier revelation stands behind it still, and we owe our first knowledge of every part of the Gospel to those communications in which the salvation " be gan to be spoken by the Lord" (Heb. ii. 3). We can observe this fact for ourselves by comparative study of these sacred writings. It rests on the fulfilment of the promise, " He shall bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you." Since, then, it was through these men that Jesus would teach the world for ever, if any graces were bestowed upon them at all, this grace of special remembrance would be the most important for them to receive, seeing it was needed for the preserva tion of the foundations of the faith. No wonder it is thus definitely promised in the first account of the work of the Spirit. Such a grace of remem brance would have two consequences, — one the adequate report and perpetuation of the words of vii PROMISE OF TEACHING 179 Christ, the other the growing apprehension of their significance through continued presence in the mind under this heavenly guidance. As to the first, we may adopt the words of Alford in his note on the passage : " It is on the fulfilment of this promise to the Apostles that their sufficiency as witnesses of all that the Lord did and taught, and consequently the authenticity of the Gospel narrative is grounded." This adequacy or suffi ciency of report does not, I think, exclude such variations of remembrance as belong to the nature of human memory, variations which might well be used, under this spiritual guidance, for the more complete rendering of the whole report. But it does exclude such variations as would be divergent from the intention of the Speaker, and would fail to render the real meaning of his words ; since his own Spirit, presiding over the remembrance, would secure the true expression of his mind. There is no small importance in this considera tion, in its bearing on differences of verbal report, which no doubt existed in the oral teaching, as they do in the written records. It must certainly have the effect of making the questions that may thus arise of minor consequence, since it adds the security of divine superintendence to that of responsible recollection. It need scarcely be said that a natural effect of the vivid remembrance of things is a clearer intel- 180 THE DISCOURSES chap. ligence in regard to them, and a more certain esti mate of their character and importance. In our common experience nothing is better known to us than this. Indeed, how many — how very many — things are only understood in remembrance ! We see them after they are over, free from the confus ing circumstances and disordered feelings of the moment ; we consider them with more thoughtful reflection and more impartial judgment; we con template them from a distance which enables us to see them as a whole, and in their relations to other things which go far to explain them ; and this is more true and more observable in proportion to the greater gravity or deeper significance of the things remembered. Never certainly did any acts or words so evi dently await this subsequent illumination as those which were seen and heard by the followers of Jesus during the brief period in which He was with them. Often did He rebuke their dulness of apprehension and mistakes about his sayings at the time. Sometimes He told them, as repeated in these very discourses, that they would find the profit of his words in the future, — "I have told you before it come to pass that when it is come to pass ye may believe " (v. 29, and xiii. 19, and xvi. 4). Always we feel that the hearers are but begin ning to understand, and they often record their own failure of intelligence. " They understood not vii PROMISE OF TEACHING 181 that saying — they knew not the things which were spoken " ; and sometimes with definite refer ence to their later knowledge, " When He was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that He spake this, and they believed the Scripture and the word which Jesus said " (ii. 22) ; or, again, " These things understood not his disciples at the first, but when Jesus was glorified, then remem bered they that these things were written of Him, and that they had done these things unto Him " (xii. 16). There were many causes which adjourned to a time of remembrance the full apprehension of his words. Such were their frequent predictive and parabolic character, their largeness and elasticity of meaning, their far-reaching intention, their rela tion to a course of things which was still in prog ress, to events which had not yet taken place, to a dispensation which was only being prepared. He is ever addressing men accustomed to another habit of thought than that into which He is lead ing them, and in a preparatory stage of their edu cation. Hence there is often a mingled tone of revelation and reserve in utterances which are addressed to the moment, while they teach the Church for ever. It has been well said: — " When we look into our Saviour's conduct in the days of his flesh, we find that He purposely concealed that knowledge, which yet He gave ; as if intending it should be enjoyed, but 182 THE DISCOURSES not at once ; as if his words were to stand, but to wait awhile for their interpretation ; as if reserving them for his coming, who at once was to bring Christ and his works into the light. . . . Apparently it was not till after his resurrection, and especially after his ascension, when the Holy Ghost descended, that the Apostles understood who had been with them. Now here we see, I think, the trace of a general prin ciple, which comes before us again and again, both in Scrip ture and in the world, that God's presence is not discerned at the time when it is upon us, but afterwards, when we look back upon what is gone and over. Our Saviour's history will supply instances in evidence of this remarkable law." 1 Yes, it supplies the most perfect instances we can imagine ; and if so great a part in the com prehension of the Gospel history necessarily be longed to the stage of remembrance, it would seem that such a promise as we read here, even if it had not been spoken, must be included in the scheme of divine teaching. For if the words of the Lord Jesus are words of eternal life, and are to the Church both primary foundations of faith and germinant principles of thought, and if, in the nature of the case, they could only be under stood in remembrance, then the first work of the Spirit would necessarily be to secure that remem brance and assist that understanding. If there was any grace or superadded aid at all given to the 1 J. H. Newman's "Parochial Sermons," — " Christ mani fested in remembrance." The sermon is a fine example of the writer's cast of thought ahd of expression. vii PROMISE OF TEACHING 183 Apostles, as witnesses to Christ, this would be the first that they would need and, therefore, might expect to receive ; and now we hear it assured to them by as plain a promise as could be given. In virtue of this promise we read, with secure confidence, in the Gospels the words of our Lord, and in the Acts and Epistles the expansions of them and deductions from them. They receive a seal and certificate beyond those of human mem ory and human reflection in the presence of the Spirit of truth, manifested, indeed, in many ways, but here first pledged by the lips of Him who gives both the Word and the Spirit. " He shall teach you all things and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said to you." 184 THE DISCOURSES CHAPTER VIII THE BENEDICTION OF PEACE v. 27 The discourse of consolation draws to its end. It has been a revelation first to faith, then to hope. Its first part, " Believe also in Me," has led on to a fuller knowledge of Jesus Christ Himself. Its second, " He shall give you another Comforter," has opened out into a new prospect of life in the Spirit. These discoveries are sources of consola tion, no doubt vaguely felt at the moment, but to be consciously experienced afterwards. Such a discourse is fitly closed by a benediction of peace. " Peace I leave with you : my peace I give unto you. Not as the world giveth give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be fearful." Peace is the equivalent for the old Hebrew word fi ..'ll'* which was used so constantly, and meant so much. It summed up the ideas of inward and outward good, and might in any particular, case have a more loose or more definite meaning, according to the mind of him who used it. " Peace viii THE BENEDICTION OF PEACE 185 be with you " was a familiar salutation ; " Go in peace," a gracious dismissal. So Jesus spake as others spake. " He came and stood in the midst, and said to them, Peace be unto you" (xx. 19). He said to those on whom He had shewed com passion (viraye — iropeiov et? elpr\vr\v, Mark v. 34, Luke vii. 50), — " Go into peace," as not only the feeling of the moment, but the state ensuing. Thus it was both a word of greeting and one of farewell. Here it is the latter, spoken as in act of departure. " Peace," He says, " I leave to you " (dcplrifu, the same word as used before, " I will not leave you desolate "). Thus He speaks of this con dition as an inheritance for those who are left. But the expression, by itself, is too indefinite for the present intention. What peace, and how be stowed ? Both points shall be made clear ; for in Christ things are specific and ascertained, and not left as they appear in the hazy atmosphere of general good wishes. " Peace I leave with you : my peace I give unto you" (elpijvrjv rrjv e/ii)v — peace that is mine), that which I possess, which is realised in Me, and which is proper to the life that is in Me. We see at once that the peace intended is peace within ; for outward peace was not the portion of Him who was " a man of sorrows," and bore " the con tradiction of sinners against Himself," and for Whom at that moment the terrible crisis was at 186 THE DISCOURSES chap. hand. Yet all the more, as He moves through trial and conflict, do we feel the serene majesty of a deep-seated peace. The enemy cannot trouble it; the world cannot disturb it; for it consists in the composure of holy affections, the calmness of a settled purpose, and the sunshine of unclouded union with God. The peace which He imparts He calls '•'•my peace," because it is to be an efflu ence from his own, and therefore will share its nature and bear its likeness. Again, as the peace is thus distinguished, so also is the giving. " My peace I give unto you ; not as the world giveth, give I unto you." The world is free with its conventional wishes, and those not always sincere. Certainly its own spirit is not the spirit of true peace ; and it cannot give what it. does not possess. At its best, its well- meant words are ineffectual, either to confer a right to peace, or to communicate the peace itself. But Jesus does both. The right to peace, which did not belong to men as sinners, He purchases for them by his atoning blood, and now by this deed of gift leaves it to them as a bequest for ever. The peace itself, as profession and experience, He imparts to his people by continuous gift, carried on to the end of time. Thus definitely are dis tinguished these two sentences, "Peace I leave with you," — " My peace I give unto you," crowned with the assurance to which our hearts respond, " Not as the world giveth, give I unto you." vin THE BENEDICTION OF PEACE 187 Great has been the effect of this word of promise, as teaching, as well as in fulfilment. It has established the word " Peace " in the heart of the Church as expressing the ideal character of Christian happiness and the rightful condition of believers. " Grace and peace " become keynotes of the Apostolic teaching, and are for ever united in all prayer and benediction. Peace represents a restful, satisfying state, an essential condition for more exalted experiences, being itself of more solid value than them all. If it be asked in what it consists, we may perhaps rightly distinguish its constituent parts, as the peace of conscience, the peace of character, and the peace of trust. There is peace in a conscience, relieved from guilt, reconciled to God, and restored to its rightful supremacy. There is peace in a character brought into order and harmony, in which the disquieting power of worldly and carnal lusts, of pride, of selfishness, of evil tempers and unworthy feelings, has given place to the reign of nobler principles and purer affections. Finally, there is peace in that trust and confidence in God, which casts all care upon Him, simply relies upon his promises, leaves all things in his hand, and is sure that He does all things well. If these be elements of peace, each one of them is the gift of Christ ; for from Him they all proceed, and in Him are found. 188 THE DISCOURSES chap. They can best analyse this peace, who find it in themselves, and know from experience wherein it consists; and these are not few: for no promise has been more extensively or distinctly fulfilled. This peace is the proper heritage of those who are in Christ, and is a natural effect of the faith which unites them to Him. The presence of it is often felt and recognised by others at their side, who will express their own desire for a blessing which they see to be real, though strangers to it them selves. It is enjoyed in different measures by different minds, and by the same mind in varying degrees; often in the highest degree in circum stances which naturally would impair or destroy it. In biographies which disclose something of the inward history, we read from time to time the thankful record of an unusual sense of peace, at some time when it was likely that the mind would be harassed with anxieties, or the spirit overwhelmed by some dreaded trial. The voice which spake in the upper room still speaks within: " My peace I give unto you ; let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid." The last word (_et\taTc_) is an admonition of no small importance, both to those who heard it then, and to us who read it now. It expresses the worst effect of the troubling of the heart, not the natural emotion of fear, but the cowardly yielding to it. It is the craven spirit which viii THE BENEDICTION OF PEACE 189 shrinks from duty, loses hope, abandons what it should hold fast, surrenders to the enemy, or deserts to his side. " Fear," says the Book of Wisdom, "is nothing else but a betraying of the succours which reason offereth " (xii. 17) ; and the fear here spoken of is nothing else but a be traying of the succours which are offered by grace. Only in this place in the New Testament does the verb occur ; but the substantive (SetXt'a) is used by St. Paul in his farewell charge to Timothy : " God hath not given us the spirit of fearfulness, but of power " (2 Tim. i. 7) ; and in the Apocalypse the adjective (SetXot) designates those who head the sad procession of the lost (xxi. 8). The adjective describes a character, but the verb only a condition, which, as in St. Peter's case, may be passing, but is sin at the time, and danger for the future. Observing that the opening sentence of the dis course (" Let not your heart be troubled ") is here repeated and fortified, we understand that all en closed within these limits is to be taken as a whole in itself, and that the intervening words compose a divine antidote to that troubling and desolation of heart which the Lord's departure would suggest. To the disciples the discourse was revelation and consolation, and so it is to us at this day; while all benedictions, pronounced in the Church, and mutual words of peace, are continuations to the end of time of this Benediction of Peace. 190 THE DISCOURSES CHAPTER IX THE ACCEPTED END v. 28-31 It is probably after a momentary pause that the Speaker reverts to the communications He has made, with regard, first, to their present impres sion ; secondly, to their future use ; and thirdly, to their near cessation. He looked on the hearers and saw that they were sad. The account given of the departure had scarcely reached their minds; to them it was de parture and nothing more. " Ye heard how I said to you, I go away, and I come unto you. If ye loved me, ye would have rejoiced, because I go unto the Father ; for the Father is greater than I " (28). "If ye loved Me," He says. They did love Him, but with unenlightened love. The word is spoken after the manner of men who seem to re prove in order to console those whom they are leaving. He has now told them whither He is going — "to the Father" — surely an elevating thought ! a proper cause of joy for his sake, and ix THE ACCEPTED END 191 also for their own. The life which He has begun with them and for them will be raised to a higher level ; " for the Father is greater than I." This is not a pronouncement on the mystery of the Godhead in respect to the relations of the Divine Persons in the ever-blessed Trinity* In all that is now said Jesus speaks from the standpoint of the present. He is the Messenger who is sent from the Father, the Way that leads to the Father, the Presence which shews the Father, the Son who does the commandment of the Father. The going to the Father is itself a part of the great economy for which He became incarnate ; and in that econ omy the Father is greater, as being the Author and the End of all that has been done, is being done, and is yet to be done in it ; and thus the word " for the Father is greater than I " sums up this whole situation and gives a supreme reason for rejoicing in the exaltation of the Son of Man to the right hand of God.1 1 In further illustration of the view here taken I append the two following extracts : — 1. " This was the great stronghold of the Arians, by which they sought to prove that the Son was not God, but the highest creature of God. But SS. Athanasius, Augustin, Basil, and the rest of the Fathers answer them, that Christ is here speak ing of Himself, not as God, but as man. And, that it is so, is plain from this, that He gives the reason why He is going to the Father: "because," He says, " the Father is greater than I." Now Christ goeth to the Father, in that, as man, He ascendeth Into Heaven. For as God He i_ alway in heaven 192 THE DISCOURSES This exaltation the disciples would some day understand, and then their love would rejoice. And so it was at once. We read that when they saw Him go, they worshipped Him, and returned to Jerusalem with great joy, and were continually in the temple, praising and blessing God (Luke xxiv. 53). But the time of understanding was not yet ; why, then, speak now of a rejoicing which they with the Father; wherefore S. Augustin saith, "He went, in that He was in one place. He remained, in that He was every where." — a Lapide, in loc. 2. "The Son, although of divine essence, and 6/wovo-ios with the Father, nevertheless was, and is, and remains, subordinated to the Father ; since the Son, as Organ, as Commissioner of the Father, as Intercessor with the Father, has received his whole power, even in the kingly office from the Father (xvii. 5), and after the complete accomplishment of the work committed to Him will restore it to the Father (1 Cor. xv. 28)." — Meyer, Handbook on Gospel of St. John, in loc. The patristic literature on the passage is abundant. Bishop Westcott, in his " Additional Note," gives judiciously chosen extracts from twenty early writers, and sums up as follows : — 3. "If we turn from these comments to the text of St. John, it will be seen that (1) The Lord speaks throughout the Gospel with an unchanged and unchangeable Personality ; the I (Jyti) is the same in viii. 58, x. 30, xiv. 28. (2) We must believe that there was a certain fitness in the Incarnation of the Son. (3) This fitness could not have been an accident, but must have belonged, if we may so speak, to his true Personal Nature. (4) So far then as it was fit that the Son should be incarnate and suffer, and not the Father, it is possible for us to under stand that the Father is greater than the Son, as Son, in Per son, but not in Essence. Among English writers, it is suffi cient to refer to Bull ; and to Pearson ' On the Creed ' (Art. 1), whose notes, as always, contain a treasure of patristic learning." • ix THE ACCEPTED END 193 could not feel? Such words could not be quite without effect at the moment ; but they will serve to assist the faith of the future. "Now I have told you before it come to pass, that when it is come to pass, ye may believe " (29). When the departure shall have taken place, and the new order of things supervened, then these and other like words will rise to remembrance, as informations and reinforcements to faith. They will assist the disciples to " believe," in the sense of apprehending things unseen, and beholding their Master, no longer seen on earth, as received into the glory of the Father. Faith will follow the course of the history through fulfilment of predictions here to fulfilment of predictions there ; and the words will have their effect in the time to which they apply. The principle of teaching in the interests of the future, and with a view to later stages of intelligent use, is illustrated throughout these discourses, and is again and again affirmed. lt is a principle in all education, though exception ally prominent in this great example of it. Preparatory words are precious, more so when they are being spoken for the last time ; and these communications are close upon their end. "No longer shall I speak many things with you (as I have done in the past), for the Prince of the world cometh." N 194 THE DISCOURSES chap. There is an end to converse and companionship in the events of this very night. The attack is to be delivered. The world in its powers, popular, ecclesiastical, and civil, is rising up to overthrow Him who stands alone to bear the shock. But there is a darker power behind, which his eye beholds and his words reveal. "The Ruler of this world cometh." Already has the Evil One been thus described (xii. 31), and the name is a revelation of fear. " This world," in revolt from its true Sovereign, has fallen under another Ruler, who has become so by its own concession and invitation, and who uses and impels it for his own malignant ends. The former saying had taken in the conflict on the whole, and declared its issue. " Now is the judgment of this world : now shall the Prince of this world be cast out." But the issue is not yet. It is the conflict which is at hand. Now he " comes." Doubtless he is always active and on the watch ; but he watches for op portunities, and they arrive. They occur through the passions of his servants, or by critical con junctures of circumstances, or by special permis sion from above. In the manifestation of the Son of God there were two great onsets, — one at its opening, the other at its close. In the solitude of the desert, "the Tempter came to him," if so be he might destroy the virtue of the heavenly mission before it was begun. He came to test the ix THE ACCEPTED END 195 human righteousness of Jesus by subtle insinua tion and direct approaches to his spirit. It was vain; and it only remains that another kind of attack should be tried. All the subservient powers of the world shall be called into action ; and the undertaking, which could not be arrested by in ward temptation, shall be crushed by violence, and extinguished in anguish, shame, and death. For this purpose it is said, "the Prince of the world cometh " ; but it is added, " and in me he hath nothing " (ev ifiol ovk e^et o. _eV), nothing at all of what he finds in the world, nothing that has any moral kindred with his nature, and by which he might have claim or right upon Me. Satan has claims on men, as he has access to them, — rightful claims, in so far as created by their own sin ; for men are victims because they are ac complices. But here is sinless humanity. The Tempter ranging round the holy soul, to seek the smallest inlet, had found none. There is, then, nothing here belonging to his dominion, which can give him right or power to assail. Why, then, should this attack be suffered? or why submitted to? If so, it can only be by free consent and voluntary act; and for that there must be some sufficient reason. So there is, in the one supreme motive of action recognised by the will of Christ. The world in this case is powerless, and its Prince is powerless. 196 . THE DISCOURSES chap. " In me he hath nothing ; but that the world may know that I love the Father, and as the Father gave me command ment, so I do " (31). The course of things is by commandment of the Father ; but the charge was voluntarily accepted, and is freely obeyed. So it will appear more forcibly, an hour later, in Gethsemane. It is not only obedience of will, it is obedience of love ; and, what is more touching, the world itself is to be brought to recognise this love to the Father. The world rising up against Him, under the horrid inspiration of its Ruler, is still the object of pity ing thoughts. What can conquer the inspirations of evil but the sweet force of holy love ? And that is to be learned from the great lesson of the love of the Father, which Jesus exhibits in his own person and communicates by his own death. As far as that lesson shall be learned, the world will cease to be the world, and own the power of the love of Christ to its own salvation.1 What a history is revealed in these brief sen tences breaking suddenly from the heart ! What an interpretation do they supply of the scenes that are to follow ! What an exposure of the mys tery of wickedness! What a disclosure of the mystery of love ! What a testimony of the will of the Father and of the Son concurrent in the 1 "Ut mundus desinat mundus esse ; et Patris in me bene- placitum agnoscat salutariter." — Bengel. ix THE ACCEPTED END 197 work of our salvation ! " Even as the Father gave me commandment — so I do." It is but for a moment that the Lord thus ad verts to the ordeal on which He is entering. The consciousness of it is present, while the mention of it is suppressed, in order that He may devote the last words to the consolation and instruction of " his own whom He loved to the end." 198 THE DISCOURSES CHAPTER X A DIVIDING LINE The last words have intimated the coming con flict and the resolution to proceed ; and it is a natural sequel. "Arise, let us go hence." This word draws a dividing line between what has passed already and all that may follow. The Supper is over, including the session, which cus tom allowed and commonly prolonged for con versation and discourse ; a conversation, on this occasion, of deepest interest, and a discourse of the last importance. Now they break up from the table, and, we should expect, with some custom ary concluding form. The two first Evangelists mention such an act, apparently as in the order of things: "When they had hymned (vfivijo-avre^, they went out into the Mount of Olives " (Matt. xxvi. 30 ; Mark xiv. 26). Alford, in his note on the passage, observes : — " Here, accurately speaking, perhaps between the v/ivq- cravres and i£rj\9ov, came in the discourses and prayers of the Lord, in John xiv.-xvii., spoken (see note ou John xiv. 31) without change of place, in the upper chamber. The v/_. os A DIVIDING LINE 199 was in all probability the last part of the Hallel or great Hallel, which consisted of Ps. cxv.-cxviii., the former part (cxiii., cxiv.) having been sung during the meal. It is unlikely that this took place after the solemn prayer in John xvii." I would only alter this suggestion by placing the recitation of the Psalms, or some of them, after chapter xiv. instead of before it; for there has been no definite break in the communication till now, when the session at supper ends, and the liturgical act is probably to be taken as an under stood form in rising to depart, and is by the Evangelists immediately connected with the move ment of the company. But then the local question arises, as to the place in which we should suppose the second dis course delivered, followed immediately by the final prayer. Commentators take different views. Some consider that all takes place on the same spot, Jesus delaying the departure till the moment in which it is said (xviii. 1), " When Jesus had spoken these words, he went forth with his dis ciples over the brook Kedron." Others think that " Let us go hence " forbids this idea, and that the succeeding words were spoken at some halting- place before crossing that boundary of the city, or (as some maintain) in the Temple, which, it is said, was opened by the priests at midnight. As one leading authority is clear and strong on the 200 THE DISCOURSES chap. question, it is right to give Bishop Westcott's own statement of his opinion : — " We must suppose that after these words, the Lord, with the eleven, at once left the house, and went on the way which finally led to Gethsemane ; consequently, that the dis courses which follow xv.-xvii. were spoken after He had gone from the upper room, and before He crossed the Ke dron. The other supposition, that, after rising, He lingered in the room as full of the thoughts of the coming events, appears to be wholly against the obvious interpretation of the narrative, and to disregard the clearer distinction in character between the earlier and later discourses." Further on in the introduction to chapter xvii., he says, " It is certain that the upper chamber was left after xiv. 31," and then proceeds : — " It is scarcely possible that chapters xv., xvi., could have been spoken in the streets of the city. It is inconceivable that chapter xvii. should have been spoken anywhere but in circumstances suited to its unapproachable solemnity. One spot alone combines all that is required to satisfy these con ditions, — the Temple courts. The central object there was the great golden vine, from which He derived the figure of his own vital relation to his people; and nowhere, it is clear, could our High Priest more fitly offer Himself, his work, and believers to the Father, than in the one place which God had chosen to set his name there " (p. 237). These are telling words ; but it may be an swered: 1. That to most readers there appears nothing inconsistent with the narrative in the sup position of a departure commenced and arrested; x A DIVIDING LINE 201 and that, in resuming the discourse without break, it rather suggests that as yet there was no great change of scene. 2. That the different tone of the later discourse is proper to an altered attitude and fresh stage of action, but not necessarily to another place. 3. That such a change is itself un likely. The house had been chosen by the Lord in a marked manner, as the place for the Paschal Supper, for the institution of the Sacrament, and for the last converse with his disciples. Why leave it before his intended communications were finished, and an integral and important part of them had yet to be delivered ? 4. It must be felt that, against the hypothesis of adjournment to the Temple, the silence of the narrative has special force. Such a choice, and for such reasons of fitness as are given, could scarcely have been passed over without a word of notice. 5. Further more, instead of being proper to the situation, it appears on some accounts quite out of keeping with it. The Temple, if open to the public, would not be the fit place for words to be heard only by the chosen few ; and it had never been the scene of confidences with them, but of public action as in the centre of the nation ; and now that action was over. Two days before, it had been the scene of the last rejection, the stern farewell and the predictive sentence of its fall. The Lord has done with the people and the Temple, and has finally 202 THE DISCOURSES chap. separated his little Church, to inaugurate the New Covenant among them. The chosen sanctuary of peace, not the forsaken Temple, is the fit place for the consummation of the work. If we set aside the idea of a visit to the Temple, and still more, of a halt on the way through the city, we can only read the discourse as resumed in the same locality. Should we desire a more particular description of the place, there seems to me a great probability in a suggestion contained in a footnote to Bengel's Commentary on Matt. xxvi. 30.1 It supposes that the company not only rose from their places and prepared to go, but that they quitted the supper room, and were arrested by the Lord's words in the court of the house. Nothing could be more natural. We know the arrangement of Jewish houses ; and this was evidently one of no mean character (Luke xxii. 10-12). Those who left "the great cham ber " would find themselves in an open court, before reaching the door which led into the street. Here a short delay might well be made. Here there might be " a fruitful vine upon the sides of the house" (or, as Cheyne, "in the recesses of the house "), Ps. cxxviii. 3, if a visible symbol be 1 " Haudimmerito existimaneris, hymnum in coenaculo adhuc pronunciatum esse, at sermones Jesu, John xv.-xvi., necnon preces cxvii. sub dio (v. 1) in area hospitii (si placet), intra urbem resonasse." — Harm., p. 522. x A DIVIDING LINE 203 sought as occasion for the first words there spoken. Here, also, it would be under the moonlit sky that "Jesus lifted up his eyes to heaven and said, Father, the hour is come." Such a locality would agree with the double impression which we receive from the narrative, of a movement to depart, and yet a continuance on the same spot. But whatever took place at this moment, it does not affect the teaching which it is the pur pose of the Evangelist to record. He carries on the line with a note of division, but no space of interruption. This is more striking if read with out the modern artificial separation by chapter and verse. " As the Father gave me command ment, so I do. Arise, let us go hence. I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman." If the mention of action had been interposed, it would have diminished the sense of continuity between the two discourses, which, as it is, the writer seems intentionally to maintain. The relation of the second discourse to that which preceded is, in the first place, one of con tinuity, consisting in the consecutive character of the ideas. All its teaching rests on the revela tions and promises before delivered. The doctrine which began with " Ye believe in God, believe also in me," had made the person of Christ to be the medium of union with God ; and that which began with " I will pray the Father, and he shall 204 THE DISCOURSES chap. give you another Comforter," had made the action of the Spirit to be the living union with Christ. These two doctrines underlie all the deliverances which follow. In the second place, the relation of the latter to the former discourse is one of development, in the more distinctly practical direction; and in con sequence, the language assumes a characteristic tone of exhortation. In the former, the keynote is consolation in view of departure ; in the latter, it is instruction for the state which will ensue. There, as well as here, the Speaker instructs; here, as well as there, He consoles. But there He is opening the view of the future to meet the sorrows of the crisis; here He has passed into that future, makes it his standpoint, and gives the needful principles for its faith and experience. He has before Him a state of things which the hearers do not yet understand, so that He seems to be speaking parables; but events will soon change the scene, and then all will be plain, and the words, remembered and understood, will be come support to the work of the Apostles, and principles of life to them and to the Church for ever. These sayings, then, with all their abrupt forms and sympathetic tones, are to be read, not as separate expressions, but as forecasting inter pretations of the ensuing history, and fundamental revelations of the truths by which it is to be x A DIVIDING LINE 205 guided and blessed. They are also to be read in the light of another principle, already noted as characteristic of the words of Jesus ; namely, the combination of an immediate and a remote inten tion, here exhibited in the adaptation to the special exigencies of the Apostles, and at the same time to the general needs of believers. It remains that, before entering on the second discourse, we endeavour to distinguish and desig nate the principal topics of this divine instruction ; which is at once the more needful and tiie more difficult to do, on account of (what may be de scribed as) the intertwinings of thought by the applications of the same truths in different con nexions. The fundamental subject is that of the relations of believers to Jesus Christ in respect of practical life under the coming dispensation ; and these relations may be distinguished as follows : — 1. The relation of members who share in his life. 2. That of friends who share in his love. 3. That of followers who share in his work. 4. That of adherents who share in his spirit. These topics are not separated formally, but interpenetrate one another; yet are they distin guished by observable succession in the discourse. 1. Thus the relation to Jesus Christ of mem bers who share in his life, and thereby bring forth 206 THE DISCOURSES chap, x fruit unto God, is set forth in the similitude of the vine and its branches (vs. 1-8). 2. The relation of friends who share in his love and maintain its continuance and manifest its effect by love to each other is presented in vs. 9-17. 3. The relation of followers who share in his work towards the world, and therefore share with Him in its enmity and in the trials of conflict, is given in vs. 18-xvi. 3. 4. The relation of adherents on whom He be stows a share in his own spirit through the active association of the Holy Ghost, as Comforter, Ad vocate, and Teacher, is expressed in xvi. 4-15. Then follow answers to thoughts which have been raised in the minds of the hearers, final words of interpretation of the crisis, renewed warnings, promises, assurances, closing with grave warning and sad intimation of desertion, which passes again into a concluding note of peace and confidence and victory. SECOND DISCOURSE XV chapter XI. Life and Fruitfulness ...... 1-8 XII. Love and Friendship . . 9-16 XIII. Enmity of the World . . 17-25 XIV. Witness to the World . 26-27 XVI XV. Treatment by the World . . . 1-4 XVI. Conviction op the World 5-11 XVII. Illumination op the Church . . 12-15 XVIII. Sorrow and Joy 16-22 XIX. Intercourse op the Future . . 22-27 XX. The Last Words ... . 28-33 207 CHAPTER XI LIFE AND FRUITFULNESS xv. 1-8 SUCH interruption as occurred was brief. The Lord resumed his discourse, and the Evangelist continues his report. For, not accidentally, nor even in loose connexion, do the following instruc tions ensue, but in necessary sequence to the pre vious words of promise, as giving the principles and outlines of the state which is to be. The first principle is that of life, generated by mem bership in Christ, maintained by a responsive will, proved and perfected by moral fruitfulness. It is taught, as it could best be taught, in a figurative form, akin to the former teaching by parable. " I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman. Every branch in me that beareth not fruit, he taketh it away : and every branch that beareth fruit, he cleanseth it, that it may bear more fruit. Already ye are clean because of the word which I have spoken unto you. Abide in me and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; so neither can ye, except ye abide in me. I am the vine, ye are the branches; he that O 209 210 THE DISCOURSES . chap. abideth in me, and I in him, the same beareth much fruit : for apart from me ye can do nothing. If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch and is withered ; and they gather them, and cast them into the fire and they are burned. If ye abide in me and my words abide in you, ask whatsoever ye will, and it shall be done unto you. Herein is my Father glorified that ye bear much fruit ; and so shall ye be my disciples." Was there anything in the actual scene which gave occasion for this figurative teaching? That question is suggested by the suddenness of its introduction and the vividness of its detail, and by the Lord's frequent habit of deriving the lan guage which He employed from objects before the eye. Those who suppose the discourse in the Temple find the suggestion in the great golden vine over the gate (though that is wanting in the. life, which is the very point of comparison). Those who place it on the way suppose a passage through a vineyard, possibly with flickering lights from little heaps of branches burning, — a scene by no means likely on the city side of the Kedron. Those who keep to the first locality have thought of vines on the wall of the house (scarcely natural, in the room, though it might be so in the court yard). Yet these excursions of imagination are hardly necessary in respect of an emblem so familiar to the minds of the hearers, as represent ing ideas akin to those which were now to be im- xi LIFE AND FRUITFULNESS 211 pressed. The vine was of old a recognised symbol of the life of Israel, ever recurring as such in the Old Testament Scriptures,1 appearing on Macca- bean coinage, and established in permanent and conspicuous form in the Temple itself. The vine offered itself as a national symbol, from its being a special product of the coun try, from the value set upon it, and from familiarity with the methods of its cultivation. As, of all trees, its growth was most conspicuously for the sake of its branches, and its branches for the sake of its fruit ; so it best served to represent a chosen stock, a planting of the Lord, the ramifications of a common life, and the purpose of moral fruitful ness for which the planting was intended. In regard to such an emblem, external suggestion at the moment seems needless, and indeed would be less suitable to this deliberate and predetermined instruction than to such as might be more casually given in converse by the wayside. It is to express ideas closely related to those which it had always symbolised, that the Lord employs this imagery, in the way not of mere application, but of perfect and predestined fulfil ment. " I am the vine, the true one " (i) a/_7r eAo? r) dXndivr']') is equivalent to, I am He in whom is concentrated the substance and the life which were but shadowed in the chosen people. From 1 E.g. Ps. Ixxx., Is. v., Jer. xi., Hos. x., etc. 212 THE DISCOURSES chap. the central but decayed stock of that people the Christ was to arise, as a shoot from the stump of a felled tree, which should spring and spread in fulness of life, and develop the fruits of righteous ness and peace. " There cometh forth a twig out of the stump of Jesse, and a shoot from its roots bringeth forth fruit; and the Spirit of Jehovah descendeth upon him," etc. (Is. xi. 1, 2, Delitzsch). Prophecy hangs in clusters on this " vine of David " ; 1 and the passage before us presents the Person who is thus represented, and in whom all will be fulfilled. It is not for ornament, but for more profound and effective teaching, that this metaphoric lan guage is employed. Spiritual subjects often re quire figurative expression; and plain words, as they are called, are often less plain from being- prosaic. The emblem still carries more meaning to the mind than the explanation of it does. One cannot but wonder at the amount of truth which is conveyed in this brief imagery; truth con cerning Christ and his members, concerning the common life that is, in Him and them, concerning JIn the scanty notes of Eucharistic service in the " Dida- ach_," the following expression occurs : " We thank thee, 0 our Father, for the holy Vine of David thy child, which thou hast made known to us by thy child Jesus " (ch. ix.). It is inter esting, as suggesting Judseo-Christian associations of thought and language transmitted probably from Paschal forms and customs. xi LIFE AND FRUITFULNESS 213 its separate realisation in individual souls, concern ing the union which is its essence and the fruits which are its end, and concerning all these things, as they are affected by the active government of God, and by the freedom of the will of man. These are subjects prolific of questions and dis cussions ; and this allegory gives the principles of the teaching of Christ upon them. Naturally, then, its expressions have been often invoked and put to various uses in Arian and Pelagian con troversies, in those of Reformation times, and indeed of all periods of the Church. But if con troversy has fastened on these pregnant sayings, that is only incidental, and lies outside the present study of them, which regards only the purpose for which they are spoken, a purpose of edification by instruction and exhortation, by admonition and warning. As in other connexions of thought (" I am the light of the world — I am the bread of life," and the like), Jesus here fixes the eye of faith on his own person ; but in the present saying He regards Himself as inclusive of his members, who partici pate in his own life, and, as it were, complete it. He says not, "I am the root — I am the stem," but " I am the vine — and ye are the branches," presenting Himself and the Church as one organic whole. Thus we see in Jesus the Incarnate Son, a new stock of humanity, planted of God in the 214 THE DISCOURSES chap. earth, able to expand his own life over others, and so to include their lives in his own and (if we may use the language here suggested) to ramify Him self in them. This capacity is the consequence of the con junction in his person of the human and the divine nature; for by the one He enters into union with us in the flesh, and by the others, communicates Himself to us as "a quickening Spirit." This is well expressed in the words of the old Belgian commentator, rehearsing also the opinions of earlier writers. " Christ has compared Himself to a vine, not as He is God, but as man. For so men are grafted into Him as branches : for these are of the same nature and kind as the Vine. Wherefore S. Hilary says (Lib. 9, de Trin.), Christ to this end assumed flesh, that we fleshly men might as branches be grafted into Him as the Vine. But yet the flesh of Christ would not have had the power of producing vine-branches, i.e. faithful and holy people, unless the God head had been united to it. Wherefore Cyril says that Christ was the Vine by reason of his Godhead ; and S. Augustin says that, although Christ would not have been the Vine, except He had been man, yet He would not have imparted grace to the branches, unless he had been God " (Corn, a Lapide in loc). *¦ In passing from the vine to the branches, we miss the precision of language which in Greek and Latin distinguish vine-branches by a word proper to themselves ; J for where vine-culture is 1 kXiJ/wi. a, palmites. xi LIFE AND FRUITFULNESS 215 a common and important industry, it naturally creates a vocabulary of its own. Our word (branches) belongs to trees in general, not spe cially to the vine. It also may represent the larger limbs, not so distinctly the smaller and more numerous shoots, such as may be broken off or grafted in, and on which, in fact, the fruit appears. Bearing the more exact language in mind, we shall see more clearly the application to individual life and membership. Whatever use we may make of this imagery in regard to churches, or collective Christian life, regarded as larger limbs or main rods of the vine, it is to the cases of personal life that this teaching is pri marily addressed. Coming next to the relation of the branches to the vine, we observe that in the view of Christ there is a membership which is real, and so ac knowledged by Him, though comprehending dif ferent conditions and results. Some would not recognise any real relation to Christ apart from that of vital and saving faith. Jesus does. The branch which beareth not fruit, and the branch which does, He describes alike as '¦'¦branches in me." Membership in the Church is in some 'real sense a membership in Christ, and the sacramental relation is a great fact, even where the spiritual relation fails. It is a different position from that of nature as to rights, capacities, and responsi- 216 THE DISCOURSES chap. bilities, all which are now in Christ; and it in volves a treatment proper to itself. Yet is it a preliminary relation ; and if it attains to nothing more, ends in a " taking away." The issue is here made to turn upon the bear ing or not bearing of fruit ; and that, of course, allows for time and opportunity, and includes the process as well as the result; for the branch is "bearing fruit," even before the fruit is formed, or is " not bearing," in its provisional stage of life. In regard to this history two lines of thought are opened, ¦ — one, that on the dealings of God, repre sented by the methods of the husbandman; the other, that on the duty of man, concentrated in the charge, " Abide in me." "My Father is the husbandman. Every branch in me that beareth not fruit, he taketh it away ; and every branch that beareth fruit, he cleanseth it, that it may bring forth more fruit." It is a compendious account of discrimination both in judgment and treatment ; in judgment, for it divides the branches in the vine according to the presence or absence of fruit-bearing life ; of treat ment, for the barren he takes away, the fruitful he cleanses. The taking away is that out of a real connexion previously existing, the capabilities of which had been enjoyed in vain ; and, after a time of opportunity and sufferance, the connexion is over. The cleansing is a treatment of considerate xi LIFE AND FRUITFULNESS 217 care, which those acquainted with the methods of vine-culture would readily interpret.1 It includes not only the use of the pruning-knife and the plucking away of too luxuriant foliage, suggesting the discipline of painful trials ; but also the gentler abrasions and ablutions for removal of mildew or parasites, suggesting purifications by milder cor rections, and the searching influence of the Word, and the gradual cleansing of grace. This continued cleansing belongs to those who are essentially clean,2 who have not now to seek the source of purity and life, but to abide in it. So it is with these disciples. As Stier has ex pressed it, " Their connexion with Christ through their first faith has made them vine-branches ; and that is their first fundamental purity." Such is the import of the address. " Already ye are clean, because of the word which I have spoken to you." They were clean, not by nature, but because of the Word, received and assimilated, which had 1 In illustration of the use of terms of vine-culture to express action in public life, Meyer quotes (JEschin. adv. Ctesiph. 166), dp.Te\o6pyovcri. rives tIjv w6\lv, dvarer^Kacn rd /cX^ara rd tou 2 In the English, "takes away," "purges," "clean," we miss the etymological connexion of thought given in the Greek (atpet, KaBalpei, KdDapos ; airei, cath-airei, catharos). The first two verbs express a likeness, which becomes a contrast ; in both cases a taking away; but in the former, of the thing itself, in the latter, of that which adheres to it. 218 THE DISCOURSES become to them, not a mere means of purification, but the cause,, or source of it, a truth which seems implied in the construction (Sid tov X070.). It is a real but not a final cleansing;1 rather, it qualifies for that after treatment which is effectual for " more fruit " ; and we see, from the discovery of their then condition, how truly this was needed. For them further cleansing and fruit-bearing will ensue, but the first duty, the fundamental necessity, is contained in the charge, "Abide in me." It is a charge repeated, insisted on, and urgently impressed, by reasoning, exhortation, and warning. This necessarily supposes the free will of those who receive it, able to be exercised in obeying or disregarding it ; which indeed is a condition sup posed in the entire teaching of Scripture. Zeal for the truths of the grace and faithfulness of God have led some to set aside the very nature of the being who is to be the subject of them ; but doctrines of irresistible and indefectible grace are obviouslj' and absolutely irreconcilable with these words of Jesus, which call for conscious choice, and deliberate intention, and active will and volun tary perseverance, and contemplate possible perils in regard to the relations which his people are to maintain with Himself. 1 "Jam vos mundi estis, mundi scilicet, atque mwidandi" (Aug.). xi LIFE AND FRUITFULNESS 219 These relations are mutual. " Abide in me and I in you." The command here precedes the promise ; but the promise is so incorporated with the command as to make both one in fulfilment. A command contemplates action, and addresses itself to the reason and the will. " Ye are in me and I in you " (xiv. 20) describes a state. " Abide in me and I in you " intends action, the continuous action by which the state is realised. This saying took a strong hold on the mind of the Evangelist, as we see from its frequent recurrence in his Epistle; and it is there evident that the anxiety about " abiding in Christ " has been made more intense by many disappointing experiences in the first age of Christianity. If it be asked, How is this charge to be fulfilled ? In what does this abiding consist? the answer may be given, that it is an internal act, involving external aids and expressions. It is done by the energies of the soul, and the habitual activities of faith, by returning, coming, cleaving to Christ, by standing fast in his word as " heard from the be ginning," by direct intercourse with Him and with the Father in the Spirit, by participation in works which associate us with Him, by loyal continuance in the unity of his Church, and by use of the means which He has appointed, especially of the holy sacrament, in which this union is renewed and sealed. These are ways and means of " abiding in Christ." 220 THE DISCOURSES chap. The necessity of it is here impressed in respect of fruitfulness, which is the result and test of vitality. For he who abides in Christ is declared to be one in whom Christ abides ; and it is the life of Christ which brings forth fruit. This les son is enforced by pregnant argument and strong assertion. " As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself except it abide in the vine ; so neither can ye except ye abide in me. I am the vine, ye are the branches : he that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit : for apart from me ye can do nothing " (4-6). " Excellently," says Bengel, " does this place set forth the distinction of nature and of grace." Consequently it has been largely handled and variously employed in the questions and contro versies arising out of that distinction. Serious as these are in themselves, and necessary in their times, we need not advert to them here. They have probably done as much to mystify as to edify those who have been occupied in them, and have tended, in the attempt at logical development, on the one side, to a depreciation of the personal and responsible will in man, to which this whole dis course is addressed ; or on the other, to an opinion of natural sufficiency and a virtual detachment from Christ, which it is the aim of the exhortation to preclude. Excellently, indeed, is the subject here presented, in words which at once recognise xi LIFE AND FRUITFULNESS 221 the essential prerogative of nature, and assert the indispensable necessity of grace. The subject here is very definite. It is not the relation of the human being to the Eternal Word in respect of all moral action, but that of the Christian to Christ in respect of the fruits of spiritual life. The " ye " who are addressed are members of the Church, regarded as branches in the vine ; and all that is said is within the revealed economy under which they are. The branch must abide in the vine, and that by a true and vital inherence, in order to its bearing fruit which in nature and quality is really fruit of the vine ; i.e.1 that evangelical righteousness (supernatural, as old writers used to call it) which cannot be orig- 1 Christ in this place makes his simile to consist only in this, that as the vine-branch derives all its vigour and sap for pro ducing grapes from the vine, so likewise must a believer draw from the grace of Christ all the nutriment and power needful for producing supernatural works. But there is this distinc tion to be drawn, that a man, in that he is a rational being, co-operates with grace, and that freely. This the branch in the vine does not do, because it is but a piece of wood devoid of reason. Now it is the result of man's free co-operation that a good work is a free and human work, even as it is because of the influx of grace that such a work becomes supernatural, worthy of God, and pleasing to Him. I confess, however, that the co-operation itself of free will, is also of grace, in this sense, that unless free will were pre vented, strengthened, and stirred up to co-operation by grace, and unless it had auxiliary or co-operating grace, it could not co-operate or do anything. This is the same reason by which Christ stimulates his disciples to abide in Him. — C. a Lapide. 222 THE DISCOURSES chap. inated from fallen human nature. This a man cannot bring forth " from himself " (aft kavroii), from his own capabilities and resources. "For," it is added (^&>/_t.), "apart from me ye can do nothing " ; i.e. in a state of severance from Me, or in action that is separate from Me, ye can accom plish nothing, nothing of the kind intended. But this sentence goes beyond the applications of it. To use Godet's words, " The theme which Jesus here develops is not that of the impotence of the natural man, but that of the fruitlessness of the believer left to his own powers. Yet it is evident that the second of these truths rests upon the first." That is true ; for the fruitlessness of the believer in the case supposed is but the result of the incompetence of nature. Thus, " Without me ye can do nothing" remains as a first prin ciple of Christianity, and a fundamental con sciousness of the believer, a consciousness exem plified in Apostolic experience, and endorsed in many a suggestive saying. " We are not sufficient of ourselves to think anything as of ourselves " ; " I laboured . . . yet not I, but. the grace of God which was with me " ; "I live, yet not I, but Christ, liveth in me." The lesson of spiritual inherence in Christ is further impressed by the contrasted history which was implied in the words, " Apart from me ye can do nothing." "If a man abide not in me," xi LIFE AND FRUITFULNESS 223 whether by open apostasy, or by silent unbelief, or by an inward deadness of soul, — if it be so with him, — what then ? Of the issue of this Christless, fruitless, lifeless state, the symbolism supplied a vivid picture in the common dealing with worthless branches and in the familiar scenes in vineyards. Such a man " was cast forth as a branch, and it was withered ; and they collect them and cast them into the fire, and they burn." Two stages of the sad story are indicated by two pairs of expressions, given in different tenses,1 — the first regarded as having occurred ; the second, as ensuing. The two first words speak for them selves : " cast outside, and withered." They were at that very time exemplified in the lost member of that holy company, now cast forth outside it, and his soul withered by disappointed worldliness and the rancour of discontent. By other charac ters and in other ways the like result is reached ; and round the true Vine the ground has been often strewed with branches cast out and withered. Sad is the first word representing severance — severance in fact, sometimes, also, in form — from the communion of the faithful and from the means of holy influence, and from the position where there is still hope. More sadly sounds the 1 The aorists (/_«'"_, ^ .# ., -f»jpn>'.ij) express the point of view taken by the foreseeing mind of the Speaker, in which all is seen as having already happened. 224 THE DISCOURSES chap. second word in the ears of any one who has watched deterioration of spiritual character, and the process of a soul growing sere and shrivelled, under the power of the world, or alienation from the truth. These things are within the sphere of observation; those which follow in the next process are beyond it. They belong to a final period, and are the work of other agents, known from former teachings as the angels of judgment, who sever and gather and cast into the fire that which, in final issue and in the sight of the all- seeing Judge, is found to be false and worthless. Short is the parenthesis of needful warning; and then the Lord reverts to the happier case with which He had begun, " He that abideth in me, the same bringeth forth much fruit." Now He applies it to the hearers, and by a few. addi tional touches makes the abiding more explicit and the fruitfulness more sweet. "If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ask whatsoever ye will, and it shall be done unto you. Herein is my Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit, and so shall ye be my disciples " (7, 8). He, then, who abides in Christ is one in whom the words of Christ abide. His words (pijfiara) taken as principles of life, guides of thought, and motives of action, are breathing in that man's heart. To such a state is assigned the great privi- xi LIFE AND FRUITFULNESS 225 lege of prevailing prayer, with all its manifold effects. " Ask " (the reading alrrjo-ao-Oe instead of alrrjaecrde, ye shall ask, is the more approved), "Ask whatsoever ye will, and it shall be done unto you." It is a charge and a promise of gen erosity truly divine. But we hear it as addressed to a will that is prompted by the indwelling words, and to desires pertaining to the life in Christ. Thus the faith by which a man abides in Him is neither blank nor silent. It is thought ful, as informed by his words ; it is prayerful, as expectant of his promise. As bearing on Christian fruitfulness, how comprehensive is the promise ! how unrestricted is the command ! Can we hear it without sadness ? Why, in so many of us, has so large a conception been answered by such poor results? We are humbled in the presence of these words ; for they reprove the asking and the will to ask, which should be so much greater than they are. We seem to hear St. Paul's remon strance, as if from the lips of the Lord, " Ye are not straitened in me, but ye are straitened in your own hearts. Now for a recompense in the same (I speak as unto my children), be ye also enlarged" (2 Cor. vi. 12). To this enlargement in will and prayer the " much fruit " is attached. This is a productive ness which appears in the formation of character as well as in the activity of work. It appears in 226 THE DISCOURSES chap. the development and manifestation of faith and love, of righteousness and truth, of meekness and patience, of generosity and devotion, of all Christ like dispositions and habits, as well as in acts of service to God and man, in labours and conflicts, in conversion of sinners and influence on the world, in promotion of the Gospel and extension of the Kingdom. Both character and work go together to compose those "fruits of righteous ness, which are by Jesus Christ unto the glory and praise of God" (Phil. i. 11). Those Apostolic words return an articulate echo to this personal teaching of the Lord con cerning fruits of righteousness — which are only by Him — and which are to the glory of God. That last thought is here impressed as the supreme motive of believers. It had been so impressed in the first teaching : " Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven." It is so in this last teaching : " Herein is my Father glo rified that ye bear much fruit." 1 This was the motive of the life of Jesus, and so of the much fruit which it produced; and his disciples must 1 The sentence is somewhat involved, but the meaning is plain: "In this (asking — obtaining) is my Father glorified, seeing it is to the end that ye may bear much fruit " ; and the arrangement has the effect of connecting the glorification of the Father more immediately with the divine action in originating the result. xi LIFE AND FRUITFULNESS 227 learn of Him the same motive and the same pro ductive life. " So," He says, " shall ye be my disciples " ; or more literally, " And ye shall be come my disciples." Such they were already; but there are degrees of discipleship, in proportion as the lessons of the Master are fully learned and more worthily exemplified. So it was with these first adherents. True disciples they were, and more advanced disciples they soon became, real ising the ideal in themselves and also before the world. The title is in a special sense their own, as the original and normal Disciples, and it remains their own to all generations. There is a gracious forecast of their future character and work, and a tone of affectionate recognition of it, in the closing words, " And ye shall become my disciples." 228 THE DISCOURSES CHAPTER XII LOVE AND FRIENDSHIP xv. 9-16 There was in the last words a tone of gracious appropriation ; and so the discourse passes natu rally from the life of Christ in his members to the love of Christ to his friends. Indeed, the last is part of the first ; for healthful vitality and productive energy are not the whole of life. A main part of our nature lies blank and barren without the genial warmth and mutual play of the affections. It would be so in spiritual, as it sometimes is in natural, experiences. But our Lord will not have it so, and He adds to the charge of abiding in his life the attendant lesson of abiding in his love. "Even as the Father hath loved me, I also have loved you ; abide ye in my love. If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love ; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love. These things have I spoken unto you, that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be fulfilled. This is my commandment, that ye love one another, even as I have loved you. Greater love LOVE AND FRIENDSHIP 229 hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. Ye are my friends, if ye do the things which I command you. No longer do I call you servants, for the servant knoweth not what his Lord doeth : but I have called you friends ; for all things that I heard from my Father I have made known unto you " (9-16). Pleasant are the words, "my love," "my joy," " my friends " ; and they come home to our hearts all the more, because spoken to individual men, on whom at the moment the eye of affection rests, the men of whom it has been said that, "having loved his own which were in the world, he loved them unto the end." Here is condensed a whole history of love in the love of the Father to the Son, the love of Jesus to his people, the love of his people to one another; each stage being both the source and the standard for the next. Thus Jesus stands as the Mediator of love,1 receiving, bestowing, transmitting it. The love of the Father here is specially the love to the Son incarnate, to Jesus as man. It is with this He parallels his own love to his people, exalting thereby to the highest point the conception of its nature and its fulness. In the charge, " Abide in my love," that 1 " Quod ait, ' Sicut dilexit me Pater et ego dilexi vos'; non equalltatem naturae ostendit nostras et suae, sicut est Patris et ipsius, set gratiam qua Mediator Dei et hominum est homo Christus Jesus. Mediator quippe monstratur cum dixit, 'Me Pater, et ego vos.' Nam Pater diligit et nos; sed in ipso" (Aug., in loc). 230 THE DISCOURSES chap. meaning is plain ; for as the Father's love means not mine to Him, but his to Me, so does my love mean not yours to Me, but mine to you ; though in each case the responsive love is involved. We are to abide or continue in that love (as it is said elsewhere, " Keep yourselves in the love of God " (Jude 21), as one would abide in the sunshine by keeping in the place where the sunshine falls. The love of Christ rests on the way of obedience, and shines along the paths of his commandments. The keeping his commandments does not create the love, any more than walking in sunny places creates the sunshine ; and accordingly, the ex hortation is not to seek or merit or obtain the love, but to remain in it by continuing in the state and life to which alone it belongs. Doubtless there is great need of the admonition thus ear nestly given. A man might wander, if he would, from the place where sunshine falls, to follow some divergent path, leading into shadow, then into gloom, then into darkness ; and so has it been with some, who in heedlessness or self-will, yield ing to seductions of error or deceitfulness of sin, have "turned from the holy commandment de livered to them." It has been shown .in previous words how, in the Gospel, commandment is inter woven with love ; and in this place the same truth reappears, but glorified by the most sublime example. "If ye keep my commandments, ye xii LOVE AND FRIENDSHIP 231 shall abide in my love ; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love." It is a touching and persuasive addition which the Lord makes to this exhortation, when He con tinues, " I have spoken this that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be fulfilled." There is a question as to what the first clause intends ; whether it be that the joy that I have in you may continue (by your continuance in the truth), or that the joy which is my own may be imparted, so as to be in you also. It is interpreted in the latter meaning by the form in which the same thought recurs in the Prayer : " These things I speak in the world, that they may have my joy fulfilled in themselves " (xvii. 13). What is this joy which is his and shall be theirs? Few are the notes of joy while He is in the flesh, as compared with the tones of sorrow. It is an exception when we read (as in Luke x. 21), " In that hour Jesus re joiced in spirit" (or in the Holy Spirit). That was in view of the names of his disciples " written in heaven," and of the effect of his own work in the revelation of saving truth. Its nature, again, is intimated in the joy of the good shepherd in the recovery of that which was lost, which be comes also the joy of his friends and neighbours. Doubtless there was a deep and mighty joy in the glory to the Father, the overthrow of evil, and the salvation of men, that stirred his soul 232 THE DISCOURSES chap. amid the sorrows of the present; but then the scene of it lay rather in the future ; even as it is written, " For the joy that was set before him, he endured the cross, despising the shame " (Heb. xii. 2). When the issue was reached, and the results were manifested, this joy was shared by " friends and neighbours," not only in heaven, but in earth. How it wrought in the hearts of the Apostles' appears in those fervent rejoicings for salvation ministered and diffused, which abound throughout the Epistles. We see there how true it was that his joy was in them, and that their own joy was fulfilled. This interpretation may therefore stand, as given in the following para phrase after other interpretations have been con sidered : — "Lastly, the words 'in you' may be taken simply just as they stand ; thus, ' These things have I spoken unto you,' that my joy, with which I rejoice concerning the glory of God and the salvation of the whole world to be accom plished by me, I may transfuse into you, as my Apostles and fellow-workers ; and that this joy may increase as your labours and your fruit increase ; until it be fulfilled in this life, but yet more completely in the life to come." 1 This state of love and joy is protected and maintained by its own laws and commandments. This condition has been premised already, and is now sealed by the repetition of the commandment, 1 a Lapide, p. 155. LOVE AND FRIENDSHIP 233 most comprehensive of others, and most distinct ive of the Gospel, which is itself an injunction of love and joy : " It is my commandment, specially mine (as before i) IvtoXt, r) e/ir)), that ye love one another, as I have loved you." So the motive and the rule, the grace and the duty, the love be stowed and the love enjoined, are bound together. This is the legislation of the Gospel, and in this fashion we are " under law to Christ." x Of the words, "As I have loved you," the crowning evidence and exemplification is at hand. " Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." No greater proof of love can be given ; no higher standard set. In both senses the Evangelist felt the power of the saying, and echoed it in after days. " Hereby know we the love, because he laid down his life for us ; and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren " (1 John iii. 16). In a few hours the act spoken of would be accomplished, and that consciousness was in the heart of the Speaker. Yet, in these discourses, this is the sole direct allusion to the fact. That is a circumstance which deserves attention, for it is an illustration of the mind of Christ. See Him in the upper room, and then in Gethsemane, and you feel the self- suppression, or (may I say ?) the self-adjournment, which love to his own imposed. To them He 1 p.}j u>v ivopos GeoC, dXX' evvopos XpurroO (1 Cor. ix. 21). 234 THE DISCOURSES chap. dedicates these hours. Their consolation and in struction is the business now ; and the teachings, which are to tell on all their after life, shall not be broken by agitating enquiries, or confused by overwhelming thoughts. The coming event will speak for itself. It is not kept secret, but is with drawn from immediate notice ; and is presented now in a single aspect, as the great act of love, and of love to friends. It had a larger purpose and effect. " Christ died for all," — " gave' him self a ransom for all," — " died for the ungodly," — "not for our sins only, but also for the whole world." But with special intention, and in the issue with full effect, He laid down his life for his friends; and this is fhe thought of the moment, while He looks on the men before Him, first members and fit representatives of that dear com pany, and says to them, " Ye are my friends, if ye do the things that I command you." Only once have we heard this address before, in an exhortation which naturally prompted a tone of special sympathy: "I say unto you, my friends, be not afraid of them that kill the body " (Luke xii. 4). But the relation had ever subsisted in a measure, both with these men, and with others, like the family of Bethany, in the kindly inter course of the past ; and the title is now conferred because the reason given for it exists as never before, in the communications and confidences of these closing hours. xn LOVE AND FRIENDSHIP 235 " No longer do I call you servants; for the servant know eth not what his lord doeth : but I have called you friends ; for all things that I heard from my Father I have made known unto you." Servants (SovXot, bond-servants) they were, and servants they continued ; and the title was dear to them, as descriptive of their place in the great household, and of the employment which was honour and joy. And so they loved to use it, and place it in the first line of their writings, " Simon Peter, a servant of Jesus Christ " (1 Pet. i. 1) ; " Jude, a servant of Jesus Christ " (v. 1) ; " Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ" (Rom. i. 1). If they had ceased to be servants, they had ceased to be friends. The familiar attitude, which some have thought to be Christian, disqualifies for the Mas ter's friendship. But true servants of the Lord of all become, by his own grace, his friends. He calls them so because He makes them such, by the confidential terms to which He admits them. The servant (8ovXo<;'), as such, knows not what his lord is doing ; for he knows only the task set him, and just does as he is told. He is not informed of the purposes, nor associated with the interests, to which his allotted task contributes. But if he be so by the master's will, a great change has come. The work may be still the same ; but now it is done with intelligence and sympathy, with a sense of fellowship in the under- 236 THE DISCOURSES chap. taking, and of participation in the master's scheme and aim. Such is the association with Himself which Jesus gives to his servants. " All things," He says, "which I heard from my Father, I have made known unto you." I have admitted you to my confidence in respect of the charge which I have from my Father, and made you partners with Me in the great scheme of God. This is indeed to treat us as friends; and this gives the true character to Christian service. An intelli gent apprehension of the revelation made to us, a spontaneous participation in the mind of Christ, a practical adoption of his interests as our own, a conscious association with Him in life and work, — these are the privileges and the duties of those to whom He says, "I have called you friends." A practical basis is given for this experience in its connexion with " what the Lord doeth." It is the work of Christ in the world which engages that service which becomes friendship; and we shall find it such, not as mere observers and approvers, but as active participants according to our several vocations and ministries. The privilege of being servants is great ; that of being friends is greater. Some good men limit themselves to the first experience, without ad vancing to the second. Loyal in duties, they do their part, and they have their reward ; but they rest in contracted ideas, and live on distant terms xii LOVE AND FRIENDSHIP 237 with their Master. Content with an elementary faith, they have little interest in the more ample communications of truth, of which it is said, " All things that I have heard of my Father, I have made known unto you." Scarcely looking be yond what they are bound to do themselves, they miss the sense of association with what " the Lord doeth." The secret of a true friendship is revealed in this explanation. That does not consist in outward re lations or circumstances, though these may become occasions of it. It consists in common ideas and common interests, in fellowship of mind and fel lowship of action. And what a power there is in it ! How often, among ourselves, does the friend ship of a superior mind exalt the lower character, enlarge the horizon of thought, and make life more worthy, more active, more interesting ! In the highest sense and fullest measure must these effects attend a friendship with our Lord and Master. What ideas can be so elevating as those which He has heard of his Father, and made known unto us? What interests can be so en nobling as those which we share with Him in conscious contribution to his work in the world? And these ideas and interests are not confined to the cultured and the few. In every rank there are friends of Christ, who receive his confidences and share in his designs. 238 THE DISCOURSES chap. To this service and fellowship Jesus had called the disciples. The initiative was his, not theirs ; so He reminds them. "Ye did not choose me, but I chose you." Some have read these words, as intending election to eternal life ; but that is out of keeping with our Lord's whole habit of speech,1 and also with the drift of the present words, in respect to the actual position of service and fellowship, and again with the use of the same verb concerning the same persons in other places.2 The choice was followed by appointment for work and its results. " I set (or placed) you, that ye should go and bear fruit, and that your fruit should abide, that whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my name, he may give it you." That which had been said before is here recalled, in order to connect it with the special objects for which the Apostles were set or constituted in their assigned position. At the same time, the fruitful ness expressed in the previous allegory receives 1 St. Augustin, both in this passage and elsewhere (lib. i. ch. 17, de Prcedest. Sanct.), understands by this choosing the predestination of God: I have predestinated you, and chosen you, without any merits of your own, to glory. But this does not agree rightly with the words, " Ye have not chosen me." For neither could the Apostles choose Christ to heavenly glory ; nor does Christ here seem to have wished to reveal his pre destination to the Apostles. For this He Himself is wont to attribute to the Father. — C. a Lapide. 2 eT\tyop.ai, to choose out for one's self. Luke vi. 13, John vi. 70, Acts i. 2, all of choosing to apostleship. xii LOVE AND FRIENDSHIP 239 here a significant addition, suggesting more dis tinctly the character of apostolic fruitfulness. " That ye should go " implies their mission as iii the mind of the Speaker, and "that your fruit should remain " is a forecast of its enduring effect. The fulfilment of that forecast is before us still, in the continuance of the faith which they preached and of the Church which they founded. But not to Apostles only does this word belong. How much fruit remains from godly lives in every age, in- lasting institutions, enduring books, hymns that are sung from age to age, in names by which the world is made better, in propagated influences of truth or goodness, in ministries, perhaps humble and obscure, but which issue in the eternal life of the saved ! It is a noble and a Christian ambition which aspires to prolong the useful effects of life on earth beyond its appointed span; and surely this enduring character belongs more or less to all good service. It is a word both of exhortation and assurance for all members, servants, and friends of Christ. " I have set you, that ye should go and bear fruit, and that your fruit should remain." 240 THE DISCOURSES CHAPTER XIII ENMITY OF THE WORLD xv. 17-25 The discourse is now to enter upon another region of thought; following the future course of the disciples it must pass into the world. The dividing line is drawn in the words, — " These things I enjoin you, to the end that ye may love one another." Most , commentators (as Luthardt and Godet) make the saying the conclusion of the preceding section. Others (as Westcott) read it as an intro duction to that which follows. Surely it is both. It is a dividing line and a connecting link. Such is the effect of a like phrase in other places.1 Here the expression intends, not a summary of what has been taught, but one practical conclu sion from it; namely, the precept of mutual love as proper to men who are in common relations of union and friendship with their Lord, such as 1 xiv. 25, xv. 11, xvi. 1, 25, 33. xiii ENMITY OF THE WORLD 241 have been unfolded in the preceding words. But the saying is at the same time an introduction to the instructions which ensue ; for this precept, delivered but a moment before, is repeated here, not simply for the sake of impression, but specially for its bearing on the experiences now to be de scribed. It bears upon them as contrasted with them, and as providing against them. The love to be maintained within the company of Christ is sharply contrasted with the hatred to be encoun tered outside it; and the uniting bond among believers is, shown to be a practical necessity, in view of the coming conflict with the unbelieving world. So the Evangelist in his Epistle, enlarging on the charge which he here records, contrasts and connects this love and this hatred, in order to impress on a later generation this lesson of his Lord. " This is the message which ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another. . . . Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hateth you. We know that we have passed out of death into life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not, abideth in death" (1 John iii. 11, 13, 14). The urgent language of the then aged Apostle evinces the pain with which he saw divis ions and antagonisms rising among Christians themselves, and threatening to bring, as they have since brought, the evil spirit of the world into the heart of the Church. Q 242 THE DISCOURSES chap. But on the evening of the farewell, these dangers lay in the distance, though in the reiterated in junction the foresight of them appears. The need then was to prepare the minds of the chosen band for the experiences of the mission and conflict which were before them. This is done in the rest of the discourse by combining premonitions of trial with promises of support. The world rising against them and the Spirit coming to their help form the picture of their future work, as followers and agents of Jesus after He is gone. Following the mingled flow of these warning and animating words, we shall observe two stages in the devel opment of the situation, — the first given in xv. 18-27, the second in xvi. 1-15. Each presents a view of the antagonism of the world, called forth by the testimony to Jesus, and of the power of the Spirit by which the testimony will be sustained; but the first stage gives the principles of the con flict, the second enters into its details. It has been remarked by Luthardt that the dif ference of subject in Chapter XV. is characterised by difference of expression. In the first half of the chapter there is an entire absence of connecting particles (a feature technically expressed by the word "asyndeton"); in the second, the particles of connexion (and, but, etc.) reappear.1 "The 1 In his "Introduction," vol. i. p. 41, Luthardt observes on the construction and form of sentences. " Asyndeton xiii ENMITY OF THE WORLD 243 emotion of the heart," says Luthardt, " expresses itself in asyndeton." So it does; but emotion is not all the reason for this manner of expression. The former section announced spiritual truths which dwell as separate oracles on the memory; the latter, predicting historical facts, takes the tone in which one tells what happens in the world. The difference is worth noting, as a mark of dis tinction between the two sections of the discourse. The members of Christ who share his life, the friends of Christ who share his love, are also followers of Christ who share his work ; and they must find, as He has found, what painful experi ences attend it. Thus the discourse must pass from the secret sanctuary to the outlying scene, and from the personal relations with Jesus to the consequent relations with the world. The atmos phere is changed in a moment. Within is the breath of love ; without are the blasts of hatred. " If the world hateth you — ( it is expressed not as a con tingency, but as a fact) — If the world hateth you, ye know that it has hated me before (it hated) you. " If ye were of the world, the world would love its own ; but because ye are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. lays thoughts and sentences utterly bare, side by side, without special note of their mutual relation. It is partly a sign of the plain statement of what is to be reported, partly the product of a deep perception of the mutual relation of the matters in question. It desires that others obtain the same perception in its native purity." 244 THE DISCOURSES chap. " Remember the word that I said unto you. A servant is not greater than his lord. If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you ; if they kept my word, they will keep yours also. " But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not him that sent me " (18-21). The world ! It is a comprehensive and com plex term, vaguely extending over all regions and races and ages. It presents mankind as a whole, but especially as self-developed in congregated numbers and social communities, and consequently discovering the predominant spirit, and exhibiting in high relief the character of human nature as it is. The world thus fashioned, thus inspired, thus characterised, is everywhere, but most in its cen tres and citadels. It is diffused over the hills of Galilee and concentrated in the schools of Jerusa lem ; it shouts in a theatre at Ephesus and rules in the palace of the Caesars ; it is in aristocracies and democracies, in the classes and the masses, in secular companies and ecclesiastical corporations, in marts of business and resorts of pleasure. Under various conditions of society and in dif ferent degrees of intensity, the world realises itself in all races and orders and places and times. But in the midst of this immense variety, what is it which constitutes the unity, and, as it were, personality, in which the world is regarded, and which a frequent use of its name in Scripture xiii ENMITY OF THE WORLD 245 represents? It may be answered that the world is one, in virtue of the mind and spirit which per vades it ; in virtue of (what in a larger sense we may call) its worldliness, being a God to itself, deriving its principles, aims, and instincts from the things that are in the world. It becomes one in virtue of the moral condition thus created, which is at its root alienation from God. That spirit had now been tested and exposed by the great embassy of love ; and the test had been applied under, what might seem, the most hopeful conditions. The Jewish world, in which Jesus appeared, was in a higher moral state than were the nations ; it was prepared by previous revela tion; it had the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law; it had godly traditions and associations, and was familiar with a religious language, which made the embassy intelligible at once. All the more on these accounts did that people show what is the inbred, inveterate char acter of the spirit of the world by its attitude towards Him who was sent from God. " He was in the world, and the world knew him not; he came unto his own, and his own received him not." But there was worse than incapacity to know, and refusal to receive ; these rose in resent ment, and settled into hatred. It was painfully felt. " The world," He had said to his brethren, "cannot hate you, but me it hateth, because I 246 THE DISCOURSES chap. testify of it that the works thereof are evil" (vii. 7). The hatred grew more active as the testimony grew more clear, and it was now reach ing consummation in the final crime. Jesus speaks now of this hatred, because his followers must inherit it; in order not only to warn them of what they will meet, but also to give them the support, which will be felt in a knowledge of the nature of the case and a sense of communion with Himself. Why should these men, with their simple char acters and good intentions, be objects of hatred to the world? But why should He have been so, who came with larger love and more ample bene fits ? If it hates you (the indicative affirms it as fact), if it hates you, ye know (or rather, know ye) that it hated me first of you (ejie irpcoTov v/mov liefiio-riKe'), an expression by which He ranks more clearly Himself and them together.1 In their case, as in his, this hatred has its root in an instinctive sense of inward severance and of a different origin. " If ye were of the world (born of and belonging to it), the world would love its own," recognising its own family likeness, with such love as is natu ral to it.2 " But because ye are not of the world," 1 So sometimes in English. E.g. Milton, — " Adam, tbe god li cut man of men since bo ru ; The fairest of her daughters, Eve." 2 The love (i