"I give theft Books. \ for the founding of a College in iHr Colony" • ILIII3I82&]Ky • DIVINITY SCHOOL TROWBRIDGE LIBRARY The Devotional and Practical Commentary Edited by W. Robertson Nicoll M.A., LL.D. THE DEVOTIONAL AND PRACTICAL COMMENTARY Crown Svo, Cloth, <,s. each. ST. PAUL'S EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS. By JOSEPH PARKER, D.D. ST. PAUL'S EPISTLES TO THE COLOS SIANS AND THESSALONIANS. By the Same Author. THE EPISTLES OF ST. PETER. By J. H. Jowett, M.A. THE BOOK OF REVELATION. By C. Anderson Scott, M.A. London: HODDER AND STOUGHTON THE BOOK OF THE REVELATION \,*> .,V° BY THE REV. Cf ANDERSON SCOTT, M.A. AUTHOR of "EVANGELICAL DOCTRINE— BIBLE TROTH," ETC LONDON HODDER AND STOUGHTON 27 PATERNOSTER ROW i9°5 TO THE EEVEEED MEMORY OF THOMAS ANDEESON MY FIEST TEACHER. PREFACE The Book of Eevelation is not one the whole meaning of which lies upon the surface. It differs from the other books of the New Testa ment in this, that the ideas it contains are ex pressed not only in words, but in words and symbols. . The meaning of the symbols must have been clear to the first readers, but is no longer obvious to us. It can only be ascer tained when patient investigation in many fields has reconstructed the political, social, and religious environment of the Christian com munities in "Asia" at the end of the first century. That reconstruction is not yet com plete, but the remarkable progress of recent years makes it already possible to interpret with considerable certainty nearly all the symbols which are used, and thus to read the book approximately as it was read by those to whom it was first addressed. The purpose of the following chapters is first to explain the book as a whole in the new light which is shed upon it by recent historical and literary research, and then to indicate lines viii PEEFACE of practical application for those principles of Divine government which it so impressively illustrates. The volume is thus intended to be complementary to the commentary in the Cen tury Bible, to which reference should be made on questions of verbal interpretation as well as all matters concerning authorship, date, and construction. The commentary of Bousset is still the best and most illuminating, but much helpful sug gestion will also be found in the recent works of Bernhard Weiss and of Johannes Weiss. In English the intelligent study of the Eevelation has been immensely furthered by the publication of Professor Eamsay's Letters to the Seven Churches, of whose authoritative statements I have availed myself freely in the relative chapters. The English edition of the Greek text which will be on the plane of modern scholarship is still to come ; but it may be looked for with confidence among those which are announced by Dr. Swete, by Dr. Moffatt in the Expositor's Greek Testament, and by Dr. Charles in the International Critical Commen tary. In the meantime I hope that the follow ing chapters may do something to remove the veil which has lain so long upon the face of the reader of the Eevelation. C. A. S. CONTENTS CHAP. THESE I. 1-3. What is an Apocalypse? I. 4-6. Where the Church of the First Century put Christ, and Why 20 I. 9-20. The Vision of the Son of Man . 34 II. 1-7. The Letter to the Church at Ephesus .49 II. 8-11. The Letter to the Church at Smyrna 66 II. 12-17. The Letter to the Church at Pergamum . . . . 81 : CONTENTS CHAP. VEESE PAGE II. 18-29. The Letter to the Church at Thyatira . . .97 III. 1-6. The Letter to the Church at Sardis . ... 113 III. 7-13 The Letter to the Church at Philadelphia .... 126 III. 14-22. The Letter to the Church at Laodicea 141 IV., V. The Vision of the Things that Are . . . 155 VI.-XVI. The Seals, the Trumpets, and the Bowls . 169 VII. The First Parenthesis : the Vision of the Eedeemed in Heaven . . . 190 X.-XI. 13. The Second Parenthesis . . 203 CONTENTS xi CHAP. TERSE PAGE XII. The Third Parenthesis : the Vision of the Woman, the Man-Child, and the Dragon . . 218 XIII The Monstrous Power of Evil . . 231 XIV. Anticipatory Visions of the Judgment . . 252 XVII.-XIX. 10. The Fall of Babylon — eome . 266 XIX. 11-XXI. 1. Seven Visions concerning the End . . 287 XXI.-XXII. 5. Jerusalem from Above . 303 XXII. 8-21. The Epilogue .322 WHAT IS AN APOCALYPSE? Rev. i. 1-3 The Eevelation oj Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show unto Ms servants, even the things which must shortly come to pass : and he sent and signified it by Ms angel unto Ms servant John; who bare witness of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, even of all things that he saw. Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of the prophecy, and keep the things wMch are written therein; for the time is at hand (B.V.). The name by which this book would be known to its earliest readers among the Christians of Asia Minor would be " the Apocalypse," or " the Apocalypse of John." This is the name which it bears in the original Greek, not only in the" " title," which is later than the book, but in the opening words, "The Eevelation of Jesus Christ," where " Eevelation " is the rendering of the word "Apocalypse." Now, those among its fir'st readers who had been Jews ere they became Christians would be quite familiar with a title such as this ; it would not be the first book bearing this name with which they were ac- 2 1 2 THE BOOK OE EEVELATION quainted, and they would be prepared for the character of its contents and the peculiar forms which they take. By the word itself, which exactly corresponds in its etymology to our word "Eevelation," they would understand the remov ing of a veil, the veil which hides the future from the eyes of men. And the period between the close of the Old Testament Canon and the end of the first century after Christ had seen the production of many books which had this purpose and bore this name. The earliest speci men of an Apocalypse — the one which is indeed the prototype of them all — is found within the Old Testament itself in the Book of Daniel ; but this had been followed by many others, the names of which are less familiar to us than they were to the Jews. There is, for example, the Book of Enoch, of Jewish authorship, and composed at different periods in the second and first centuries before Christ. It was for long regarded by both Jews and Christians as inspired. It is quoted by name in the Epistle of Jude, and probably referred to in the opening chapter of the first Epistle of Peter. It consists largely of visions which purport to have been seen by Enoch, " the seventh from Adam," and is written in the first person as though by Enoch himself. There is no doubt, however, that it is the production of a much later age. Then there is CHAPTEE I. 1-3 3 the Assumption of Moses, from which, in all probability, St. Jude derived his allusion to " Michael the archangel contending for the body of Moses." Another book of this class which had wide circulation and great influence in both Jewish and Christian circles is the Fourth Book of Esdras, or Esra, which is more familiar than the others, because it is found in the Apocrypha. Like Enoch, it is quoted by many of the early fathers as a work of genuine inspiration, and it is of special interest to us because it is practically contemporary with the Apocalypse of St. John. It also is a record of many visions, and makes even more abundant use of the symbolism of beasts with many heads and eagles with many wings. There are still several other Jewish works of this class which might be enumerated ; but it is not neceBsary to do so here, nor yet to describe further the contents of this Apocalyptic literature. Our main purpose is to call attention to its exist ence, and to the great interest taken in it by many Jews of the first century, and now to indicate briefly the general character of these books in order that we may have an idea of what our Book of Eevelation means by calling itself an Apocalypse. The first thing to observe is the kind of atmo sphere, political and religious, in which they 4 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION flourish. An Apocalypse is the product of " bad times" — bad times for the Church, the people, and the Kingdom of God. The cause of this con dition of affairs is seen to be a double one, external and internal. The external cause is the oppression of the enemy, the fact that, for a time at least, the foes of righteousness have got the upper hand, the people of God are suffering persecution, the present is dark, and the imme diate future darker still. Hope, at least for this world, is, humanly speaking, almost at an end. Nothing short of " a new heaven and a new earth " can bring redress and security. And the internal cause is the absence of any " open vision." Apocalyptic is the successor of prophecy : it comes into vogue when, and because, prophecy has ceased. The period following on the close of the Old Testament is full of evidence that men were sadly conscious that it was so with them. There was no longer any one by whom it could be said, " The word of the Lord came to me." And men who desired to find a message of mingled warning and encouragement for their contemporaries, turned to the prophets for their inspiration, and tried to read the future in the light of the principles they laid down. The prophet had been first and foremost an orator, a speaker- forth of the mind of God to men. The Apocalyptist is a writer: he writes in solitude CHAPTEE I. 1-3 5 what another may read in public. He is a seer. He sees the future as it needs must shape itself in accordance with the principles of Divine govern ment, and the attributes of the Divine Being, which have been revealed through the prophets. He is not conscious of personal inspiration such as would enable him to reveal new truth, but acts rather as the interpreter of earlier revelation, showing how it may be applied to his own present or to the immediate future. This twofold characteristic of the situation out of which the Apocalypses spring, the oppression of God's people and the absence of direct in spiration, leads to the second and most striking feature of -all these books, namely, that they transfer the scene of God's manifested glory from the world that now is to a world which is to come, or (giving a slightly different rendering to the word represented by " world ") from the present "age " to a future one. In other words, they interpose between their own time and the fulfilment of God's promises a crisis and catas trophe so great that it may be identified with the last judgment, overturning so completely the present constitution of the world, that what follows it is " a new heaven and a new earth." In this we see the greatest distinction between them and the prophets of Israel, who had foretold the fulfilment of God's promises under the con- 6 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION ditions of the life that now is. They predicted a golden age for Israel, marked by the restoration of Jerusalem, the return of the captives, and the establishment of an ideal kingdom upon earth in the rule of the Messiah. The glories of this Messianic age were to be largely of a material and earthly kind : they are expressed in terms of earthly prosperity. When the horizon of the life that now is remained so bright, it is little wonder that the Jews before the Exile betray but little interest in the life that is to come. The hope of immortality w'as at best but dim, partly at least because the need for it was but lightly felt. The Apocalypses, beginning with Daniel, show a change of profound significance. The keynote of their conception is found in the saying which becomes current after the Exile : " God has made not one world but two, not one age but two ages." That is to say, this world, this age, this dispen sation, is to be followed by another, the outward conditions of wliich will be very different, and the transition from the one to the other is the crisis of judgment. Isaiah looks forward to the establishment of a Messianic kingdom upon earth, where " the cow and the bear shall feed, the lion shall eat straw like the ox, and none shall hurt or destroy in all my holy mountain." The trans formation is a moral and spiritual one rather than CHAPTEE I. 1-3 7 a physical; and even the "new heavens and the new earth" of this propbet's prediction leaves room for the " sinner of an hundred years old." The Apocalypses, on the other hand, look through and beyond any such tentative' realisation of the Messiah's kingdom to an entire reconstitution of the conditions of life. In their " new heaven and new earth " there is "no curse any more," neither any place for the "fearful and the unbelieving." The centre of the prophets' hope is a restored and glorified Sion upon earth : the Apocalyptists interpret these prbphecies in what we should call a spiritual sense, and all their gaze is fixed upon the heavenly Jerusalem, the city of the living God " coming down from heaven." Thus, in passing from prophecy to Apocalypse, we pass from the expectation that God's right eousness and glory will be completely vindi cated on earth to the expectation that they will be vindicated finally and completely only in heaven. It would be hard to overestimate the change in human thought and outlook which is here involved ; and yet there is a point of view from which these two convictions, apparently so con tradictory, are seen to lie side by side, in perfect harmony, and that is the point of view of Jesus. When He declared, " the kingdom of heaven is within you," He revealed a higher truth in 8 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION which both the earlier ones find their harmony. He declared in effect that the Kingdom of God is not conditioned either by space or time, that it does not follow the life that now is, as the Apocalyptists thought, but penetrates and per meates it ; and on the other hand that it is not exhausted in any earthly manifestation, as the prophets thought it might be, but finds its con summation in the world to come, the life beyond the grave. A third characteristic which all these Jewish Apocalypses have in common is to our minds a startling, and even a perplexing one. It need not disturb the study of our Apocalypse, which in this matter differs from all the others; but the fact is nevertheless important, that they are all " pseudonymous." That is to say, they bear the name, and are written in the name, of some one who was not their author. The names they bear, such as Enoch, Moses, Isaiah, Baruch, Esra, and so forth, are names of men who were dead and gone many centuries before these works were written. And yet there is no room for any suggestion of fraud or deception practised on the contemporaries of the actual writers. In all probability, it was a well-understood device, adopted for reasons that were equally well under stood, reasons partly political and partly religious. To appreciate the point of view from which this CHAPTEE I. 1-3 9 was possible, we require to divest our minds of our modern ideas of literary property. In Hebrew literature there is no trace of any writer regarding his work as in any sense his property or of any benefit accruing to him from its production ; nor is there any trace of one writer recognising the writings of another as his property. Men wrote then for altogether different motives from those which have prevailed especially since the inven tion of printing. They wrote neither for fame nor for profit, but simply to help other men by recording the thoughts which God had given either to themselves or to others. Those who. wrote under a strong sense of being commissioned by God to address men, did nothing, indeed, to conceal their own personality. In their case the personality added weight to the message. Others, again, writing without that sense, wrote anonymously, as in the cases of Lamentations, parts of Proverbs, or Jonah. The third class, who belonged to a time when it was a matter of common consciousness that there was no longer any open vision, frankly attached their work to the name of one long ago departed, on the ground that they felt their spirit or their message in harmony with his. So far from being either anomalous or fraudulent in its purpose, this pseudonymous writing was one of the recog nised literary methous of the time, and one 10 THE BOOK OF REVELATION which was followed with an entire absence of any intention to deceive. We mark this common characteristic of the Jewish Apocalypses, however, rather as a point of contrast with the Apocalypse of John, which is neither anonymous nor pseudonymous, but stamped at more places than one with the name of its author, and that the name of a living man personally known to many of his first readers. ' A fourth characteristic of these books is to be noted and carefully borne in mind, and that is the use made by a writer of an Apocalypse of the material provided by his predecessors. This is at once abundant and free. Not only does he quote, and that without indicating where he quotes from, but his method consists largely in quoting with such alterations and modifications as may makfe the old material serve the needs of a new time. It follows that in many instances the writer's distinctive contribution is to be found rather in the modification which he introduces than in the material which he actually makes use of. The most considerable source from which these later writers draw is undoubtedly the Book of Daniel. In this we meet for the first time many of the symbolic figures and actions which became, as it were, apocalyptic conventions, part of the frame work or setting in which, from thenceforth, CHAPTEE I. 1-3 11 Apocalyptic ideas were commonly expressed. Thus, the method of representing the great world-powers under the forms of various living creatures, and their kings as "heads" of a "beast," the introduction of Antichrist or the " abomination of desolation " as part of the " world-process " of the future, and the computa tion of the duration of his reign by means of cryptic numbers, these are only some of the features which make their earliest appearance in Daniel, to form afterwards part of the material with which the Apocalyptists work. These, then, are the most important features which mark the Apocalypses as a form of litera ture. They are also marked by a common pur pose. An Apocalypse is a " Tract for Bad Times," intended to encourage God's people suffering under the strain of oppression and persecution. The writer's object is to steel them to patience and endurance unto the end by the presentation in the most vivid form of the fact which overrides all others, " the Lord reigneth," and will surely come with a recompense. The assurance is con veyed by means of a series of pictures of the future, or visions of the real but unseen present. The personality and inspiration of the writer dis play themselves not in the material which he may have derived from earlier sources, but in the selec tion he makes, in the adaptation he puts upon it, 12 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION the interpretation of the world's history which clothes itself in these forms. On two points, however, our Apocalypse, the Book of Eevelation, differs from the others with which we are acquainted. First, as we have already observed, it is not pseudonymous. It does not claim to have been written by a great prophet or religious leader of the past, but claims to come from the pen of a contemporary of those to whom it first came. It claims, further, to be written by one John, a disciple of Christ, and a person of acknowledged authority and influence in the Churches of the Eoman province of Asia. Very early tradition asserts that this John was no other than John the son of Zebedee, one of the Twelve, the one whom Jesus loved, to whom the Church ascribes also the authorship of the Fourth Gospel. And while no doubt lias been ever raised as to the justice of the claim to be written by a contemporary, and by one whose name was John, the tradition that this was John the Apostle has also met with general acceptance ; although there are those who would recognise in the author another John, who is dis tinguished from the Apostle as the "Presbyter" or Elder.* But inasmuch as he also was one of the circle of our Lord's personal disciples, as- * See further on this and other matters above mentioned in the Century Bible, Revelation, pp. 13-45. CHAPTEE I. 1-3 13 sociated with Him during His earthly ministry, it does not greatly matter for our present purpose which of the two is to be regarded as the author. In either case he was a Jew, one who had known Jesus according to the flesh, and had companied with Him as He walked and taught among men. The second point of difference is that this book is written by one who is conscious of Taeing a prophet. He followed the Apocalyptic method in making use of earlier material, but he was not as the other Apocalyptists referred to above, a mere adapter and interpreter of earlier Apoca lyptic visions. He was one of the new order of prophets — Christian prophets — who made their appearance after Pentecost, and played a great part in the Church of the first century. He spake, being moved by the Spirit of Christ. But the form into which he threw his utterance was that of an Apocalypse, and we may be pre pared to find his work marked by some of the characteristics common to the class. John records in this book the vision or visions he had seen in Patmos, but he does more. The visions set his prophetic activity in motion. It was probably after he had left the isle of his banishment that he committed to writing what had been given him to see. And as he weaves together his record of that, he weaves in other things the fruit of meditation on his strange 14 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION experience, fragments and echoes of Old Testa ment prophecy and Apocalypse, and, it may be, fragments of other Apocalypses which were precious in his sight. It is impossible, and it is not necessary, to distinguish what he had actually seen from the thoughts and memories and predictions which he thus wrought into the record of his visions. He had seen a picture or pictures of infinite wonder ; he had heard the voice of Christ commanding him to write not only "the things which thou hast seen," but also the things which are and the things which shall be hereafter. He was at once the describer of his vision and its interpreter, delineator of the world as seen by the eye of God, and prophet of the things that must shortly come to pass. Under the form of an Apocalypse he spoke as a prophet. The time seems to have come when we are called upon to give new heed to his message, and to employ the new material which has been accumulating for its just interpretation. For some time past the Apocalypse and the circle of ideas which it represents have suffered from com parative neglect. This is in part due to the uncertainty of its interpretation and the vagaries of its interpreters. In part it is due to our pre occupation with the opposite pole of Christian hope and consciousness, that wbich may be CHAPTEE I. 1-3 15 called the ethical. The world that now is, and the world that is to be, these are the two foci of an ellipse of great orbit, round which the mind of Christendom has travelled several times, held in its place by its relation to both these foci, but nearer how to one and -now to the other. The mind of the Church has been at one time more clearly conscious of her redemptive mission to society, at another of her native opposition to the world as now constituted. Her attitude over against that world has been now one of hope that the Kingdom of God might, come to be realised under present conditions, now one of despair as looking for that realisation only under the conditions of a new heaven and a new earth. There has also been a tendency in those who stood at one point of view, to criticise those who occupied the other, not having reached the higher point where both are seen as one. For it is undeniable that both points of view find recogni tion in our Scriptures, and may indeed be found in the teaching of our Lord. The one serious mistake we have to learn to avoid is that we should insist on making either of these foci the centre round which our life and thought are to turn ; and the one secret of harmonious thinking in justice to all we know of God is to recognise that in Christ Jesus the two coincide, that for us in Him they are continuously approximating, and 16 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION so the thought and life which revolve round both these points in equal balance tend to move in a perfect circle. The ethical and the Apocalyptic elements both have their place in the Christian system ; both are necessary factors in redemption. No wise man will presume to dogmatise on the historical movement in the midst of which he stands; but unless the signs of the times are very deceptive, we are at or near a point where the emphasis which has for fifty years been laid upon the realisation of the kingdom upon earth will make way for a new emphasis to be laid on the transcendental Kingdom of Heaven. We have most of us lived through an era of enthusiasm for social amelioration as the tangible working out of God's will for men. Stimulated by the preaching of F. D. Maurice and Charles Kingsley, by the preaching and social work of Thomas Chalmers, roused by the pungent satire and inspired by the ideas of Thomas Carlyle, stung by the polished criticism of Matthew Arnold, and less reasonably so by the sneers levelled by George Eliot at other-worldliness, English Christianity during this period came to be pene trated as never before with the conception of the service of man as a duty to God. Attention was concentrated upon the life that now is, on the ethical side of religion, the Sermon on the Mount, and the amelioration of the conditions of existence CHAPTEE I. 1-3 17 for the poor and suffering. The poet of the period was Tennyson with " Locksley Hall," " Maud," and "The Princess"; its statesmen, Bright and Cobden, passionate for the rights of the people and the welfare of the masses ; its martyr, Arnold Toynbee, burning himself out in the effort to instil into the rich their obligation to the poor. The governing idea less or more consciously present to the minds of these men was the Kingdom of God to be established upon earth, for whose realisation men were called upon to strive and pray and suffer. Their attitude to God might be expressed in the words of the disciples on the way to Emmaus : " Wilt thou not at this time restore the kingdom ,to Israel? " Wilt Thou not here and now and under the conditions of this present life 4 establish the rule of justice, mercy, and peace ? And there was an under-running current of suggestion that if God would not, or did not, manifest His power in this way, if the Church could not on this plane vindicate her claim to be the agent of the Divine redemption, it hardly mattered what God might do or not do under other conditions and in another world. Now the situation is changed : for good or for evil we find ourselves living in a different moral atmosphere. The mere rehearsal of these mid- Victorian names carries with it the impression that whoever may be the men that influence^ojis- 3 18 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION generation and express its attitude to life, it is not these. Many of the principles which they held to be axiomatic, or demonstrated through their effort, are now dismissed or ignored. Many of the ideals which they assumed as desirable or desired by all are now questioned or scouted. The principles are not the less true; the ideals are not the less noble and ennobling ; but those who assert them are not the voices which are heard; what was once a commonplace of public life may now sound as a lonely echo from the desert. Like every partial failure Of human aspiration, this change has been due in large measure to one-sidedness, to concentration on one half of tfye complete ideal, in this case con centration on the Kingdom of God as coming by process only, and under the conditions of the life that now is, and to the ignoring of the other half of truth, the conception of the Kingdom as not of this world, as finding its consummation under con ditions of spiritual existence,, and after a crisis, a catastrophe, which for the individual is repre sented by death, and for humanity by the crash of judgment. In other words, through their enthusiasm for the teaching of the Sermon on the Mount men were led to overlook the teaching of Matthew xxiv. ; in their devotion to the ethical and practical they forgot the mystical and transcendental elements in the system of Jesus ; CHAPTEE I. 1-3 19 they sat at the feet of the prophets, but the Apocalypse was a book of unimportant mysteries. It is, therefore, by no means accidental or without significance that in the last ten or twenty years there has been a marked revival of interest in the whole subject and literature of Apocalypse. Both the Christian and the Jewish conceptions of the world to come, of judgment, of the reign of God in a new heaven and a new earth, have been investigated with a thoroughness which sheds a new light on this whole area of thought. The pendulum has swung so far in the new direction that at least one competent scholar of the New Testament has advanced the opinion that the real emphasis of our Lord's teaching is to be found less in the ethical standards therein set up for the present than in the Apocalyptic revelation of the future. The time^seems to have come, therefore, for making the attempt to expound, with the aid of the new material, the meaning and value of the one Apocalypse contained in our New Testa ment, in the hope of restoring it, if possible, to its proper place in our private as well as our public Canon of Scripture. WHEEE THE CHUECH OF THE FIEST CENTUEY PUT CHEIST, AND WHY Rev. i. 4-6 John to the seven churches which are in Asia : Grace to you and peace, from Mm which is and which was and which is to come ; and from the seven Spirits which are before Ms throne ; and from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loveth us, and loosed us from our sins by Ms blood; and he made us to be a kingdom, to be priests unto Ms God and Father; to him be the glory and the dominion for ever and ever. Amen (B.V.).We have learnt in the previous chapter what it means that in the Book of Eevelation we have " words of prophecy" in the form of an Apoca lypse. The writer is one of the new order of Christian prophets, corresponding to those of the Old Testament, but proclaiming the mind and will of God in the name, and in the spirit, of Jesus. To him has been given while " in the isle that is called Patmos " a mighty vision of things to come ; and he obeys the injunction to write 20 CHAPTEE I. 4-6 21 down "the things which he has seen," along with " the things which are." In doing so he weaves into his description much that is the fruit of meditation on what he has seen, much that was lying in his memory, handed down from the prophecies of the Old Testament, and possibly some things contained in later Jewish literature with which he must have been familiar from his early days. These things provided to a consider able extent the forms into which he threw the description of what he had seen, the colours with which he worked in building up his picture ; and the whole took shape as an Apocalypse, one of a well-known and well-defined class of. literature, with rules and methods of its own. Just as St. Luke, writing the Acts of the Apostles, wrote history, and St. Paul, writing to Timothy, wrote an Epistle, so St. John wrote an Apocalypse. Before, however, he comes to the actual vision, the description of the things which he has seen, and the prediction of the things which are to come, he sets before his readers, in vers. 4-6, a wonderful description of the things which are. " John to the seven churches that are in Asia : Grace to you and peace from him who is, and who was, and who is to come : and from the seven Spirits that are before his throne : and from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loveth us, and loosed us from our 22 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION Verses sins by his blood : and he made us to be a 4-6. kingdom, to be priests unto his God and Father: to him be the glory and the dominion for ever and The form into which this rich and compre hensive statement is thrown is that of an address or salutation to the Churches in Asia Minor with which the Apostle was personally acquainted. To them, in the first place, his message was to be directed, but through them, as a representative group, to the Church as a whole. It is a salutation, passing into a bene diction, and that into a doxology. It would be difficult to exaggerate the interest of this passage in the history of religion. We seem to see here Christian theology in the making. We touch it, and are enabled to observe it, at the point of transition between living experience and formulated doctrine, be tween the individual and diversified experience of men in contact with Jesus and the collected and connected formulae of a creed. The Christian faith, when it came to be finally defined, pro claimed a triune God — Father, Son, and Holy Spirit — and Christian thinkers exhausted the resources of thought and language in the attempt to define their mutual relation. In this passage, though we are far from having reached that stage, it is easy to see that the Apostle traces the grace CHAPTEE I. 4-6 23 and peace which he invokes to a threefold source, and so describes that source as to suggest rather than to define the Father, the Spirit, and the Son. The order in which these are arranged is, of course, remarkable, and probably unique ; and even more remarkable is the way in which the Spirit is referred to. In both these points we see tokens of Christian thought at its earliest stage. But what is most important is to observe that we have before us not formulated dogma, but elementary reflection on experience. John and his fellow-believers knew that grace and peace had come to them from God; that grace and peace had come to them through the ministry of the Spirit, and also that grace and peace had come to them by Jesus Christ ; and in the prayer that the same benediction may be continued and extended the Apostle appeals to the same three fold source from which he had known it to reach himself. We have, then, as the first element in the apostolic consciousness, experience — expe rience of "grace and truth coming through Jesus Christ." This gives him his material. But we see also what it is that gives him the form in which his experience is described. And in this passage, as largely throughout £he book, it is the language and the symbolism of the Old Testament. In the striking phrase, " Him which is and which was and which is to come " (still 24 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION more striking in the original than it can be made in a translation), there is a direct allusion to the great passage in Exodus where Jehovah reveals himself to Moses as the " I am," the self-existent and eternal one. In the description of the " seven spirits before the throne " the Apostle is drawing on the language of later Judaism, according to which the chiefs of the angelic bands of spirits were seven in number. And when he describes Jesus as " the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth," he is paraphrasing the language of the Psalms so as to make it express what had come under his own observation. But it is Jesus whom he sets there, alongside of God, as part of the threefold source of grace and peace. This fact deserves our close attention, both in its extraordinary character and in the explana tion which it suggests. It is, indeed, very extraordinary that we should find Jesus set where He is set here; and the marvel has only become the greater as through investigation and criticism the situation has been made more clear. To our fathers it seemed only natural that those who had hailed in Jesus the long-expected Mes siah should forthwith invest Him with Divine rank and honour. To them the ancient pro phecies and hopes concerning the Messiah seemed CHAPTEE I. 4-6 25 to involve nothing less. Had He not, for example, been described by Isaiah as " the Mighty God the Everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace " ? Had not His suffering and subsequent exaltation been foretold with singular minuteness in the famous fifty-third chapter of the same book? Looking back on these things in the light shed on them by the actual manifestation and history of Jesus, they do seem to us to anticipate with strange accuracy both the experience through wbich He passed and the glory He has received, so that it is difficult to realise that the Jews were not pre pared to hail Him as God in man, if they were able to recognise Him at all. And yet it must be remembered that Jesus in His historical manifestation was both less and more than the Messiah looked for by His contemporaries. According to Jewish understanding of these pro phecies, even of the greatest of them, they could be, and were to be, fulfilled in the person of a human sovereign, an ideal king over an Israel restored to independence and to power. And in the generations following the close of prophecy this hope waned and revived only to wane again, so that there were periods in Jewish history before Christ when the religious hope of the future hardly included the figure of Messiah at all. And as to His coming to glory through suffering, that prophecy had been so little under- 26 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION stood, or had made so little impression, that when Jesus spoke of the Cross that awaited Him, one of the disciples who knew him best " took Him and began to rebuke Him." Whatever it was that led the Church of the first century to set Christ where it did, in the glory of the Father, it was not merely the fact that they believed Him to be the Messiah. It is indeed a great miracle with which we are confronted. Just as Jesus transformed the Cross, which was religiously as well as politically a symbol of shame, into a throne of glory, so He transfigured the idea of the Messiah from that of an earthly deliverer and potentate into that of God in man. And the less predisposition there was in the minds of His contemporaries to such a transfigura tion the greater was the marvel wbich He wrought. Neither shall we see it in its true light unless we bear in mind another fact which made the transfiguration of the Messianic idea all the more difficult to effect, namely, that these Jews were before all else in their religion monotheists. The thing from which they shrank with deepest horror was offering to any one but Jehovah the honour which was due to Him alone. It was the lesson which had been burnt into their consciousness by the fires of suffering, and annealed by the chill of exile, one CHAPTEE I. 4-6 27 which they never afterwards forgot and never questioned. From the time of the return from Babylon they were rigid , monotheists, both in theory and in practice ; and yet those who believed in Jesus set Him where they did. The fact is nowhere more conspicuous than in the Book of Eevelation. Although the writer is plainly a Jew of Jews, his mind saturated with Hebrew literature and Hebrew modes of thought, a true son of the race with which monotheism had become a passion, and the ascription of Divine honour to any other than the supreme God a horror and a blasphemy, he nevertheless sets Jesus, the man whom he had known in the flesh, side by side with God. Indications are not wanting of the writer's familiarity with the historical Jesus. He frequently makes use of the name which specially marks His human nature ; he refers to His death at Jerusalem, to His resur rection, and to His exaltation to the Father's throne. He alludes to the twelve Apostles, and echoes more than one of the recorded sayings of Jesus. But for him the Jesus whom he had known in the flesh is lost in the glory of the exalted Lord. He is "the Lord of lords and King of kings." His existence reaches back before the beginning of things created. Himself the principle from which all creation issues, He is the absolutely Living One, by whom it can be said, as God alone 28 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION can say, " I am the first and the last." To Him, therefore, is committed the unfolding of the book of human destiny, the waging of the final conflict with evil, the holding of the Divine assize. All these functions which men had been taught to recognise as absolute prerogatives of the Divine, John lays without explanation upon Christ. And not these only which belong to the future, but also those attributes which had been displayed in earlier revelation as the peculiar property of the Most High are similarly assigned to Jesus Christ. In the vision of the Son of Man which imme-^ diately follows this passage, the Apostle takes one after another of those phrases which had been consecrated from old times to the description of the Most High God, those attributes in which by prophet and psalmist He had been apparelled, and applies them to Christ as though they were recognised to be His by right. The description of the " Ancient of Days " in Daniel is transferred to Him. He holds the keys of Hades and of Death. He searches the hearts of men. He shares in the Divine honour paid to God : even angels join in worshipping " God and the Lamb." * We cannot but inquire with wonder to what cause or causes this central phenomenon of the Christian consciousness is to be traced. Other causes, and among them prophecy in particular, * See Century Bible, Introduction, p. 72. CHAPTEE I. 4-6 29 may have contributed ; but the cause which was both primary and efficient was the personality of Jesus, the total impression which He made on those who knew Him best, and their conviction that He had loosed them from their sins and made them kings and priests to God. On the one hand there was the total impression made by Jesus, His personality and His history. The Apostle, in the description which he here gives, at least suggests the elements which went to make up that impression. In the phrase "faithful witness " there is an echo of His words recorded in the Gospel : " I bear witness to the truth," an allusion to the impression Jesus had made as a teacher, to the self-luminous revelation of which He was the bearer to the world. "First born from the dead" testifies to the central fact/ of the disciples' knowledge concerning Him, that though He had been dead, yet He was living, and so to the revolution in their thinking which had been wrought by His resurrection. " Prince of the kings of the earth," a phrase moulded on the Messianic language of the eighty-ninth Psalm, attests the impression Jesus had made of universal dignity and authority, the conviction He had wrought in the minds of His disciples as to the supremacy of that spiritual kingdom of which He was King. These are the elements in His per sonality and His history here indicated by John 30 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION which combined to produce such an impression that the men who believed in Him could do nothing else than equate Him with God. But there was another line along which they were led to the same conclusion, and that was their experience of what Jesus could do, and had done, for and in those who believed. And as the thought of this rises in the Apostle's mind he passes over from benediction invoked upon his readers to doxology addressed to Christ. Here is what Christ had done for him and for all his brethren : " To him that loveth us, and loosed us from our sins by his blood." So the true text reads. Some copyist, who was thinking more of grammar than of Christian experience, thought it must be a mistake, and altered it to " loved." Or perhaps John himself first wrote "loved" and then bethought him : " Why should I say ' loved ' when He loves us still? " At any rate, there is conviction of the early Church : the Jesus whom they had known not only loved them while He was their companion on the earth, but loves them still, shares therefore in that further quality of the Godhead of which John writes elsewhere : " God is Love," and gives to that quality just what each man requires to find in it, personal direction towards himself. Thus Jesus is the link between the universal God and the individual soul. What without Him would be incredible, not only be- CHAPTEE I. 4-6 31 comes credible but is actually realised through Him. God loves me: I know it by referring myself to the historical Jesus : and when that is so, He has for me the value of God. But the experience mediated by Jesus does not stop here. He " hath loosed us from our sins," says John. Or, it may have been "washed us from our sins " that he wrote. In either case think what it means that John and those in whose name he wrote had found this to be so, that a guilty past was no longer a barrier between them and God, that they could stand conscience-clear in the presence of the All-Holy One, that they were no longer the slaves of sin and sinful habit, but men of moral stamina, able , to resist and overcome temptation. And this they traced to Jesus, not to any ritual they had performed, not to any sacrifice they had offered, not to any moral revolution engineered by them selves, but to what He had done for them in dying, and in them as living again. Along with this their indubitable experience of forgiveness of, and deliverance from, sin, we must take the universal conviction of their time, expressed by certain of the Pharisees in our Lord's lifetime : " Who can forgive sins save God only ? " in order to see the full bearing of the fact that these Christians of the first generation knew, felt, and declared that it was through Jesus that this had 82 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION happened to them, that they had been loosed from their sins. But there is still a further point in their experience which goes to explain why they put Jesus where they did. They found themselves in a new relation to the world, and to one another as well as to God. They felt that they were collectively a kingdom, a society distinct from the surrounding world, exalted above it, exercising royal powers over life. They were conscious of living on a higher plane, in another mode of existence penetrated by the powers of the world to come. And they formed also a priesthood. Formerly they had looked up to other men as the appointed and necessary mediators of God's mercy and God's truth. Now they needed such no longer. They had stepped up into their place, conscious of having for them selves immediate access to God, and of offering unto Him a continuous " spiritual service," the daily sacrifice of heart and mind and body, which made any other sacrifice as unnecessary as any other priesthood. And this glorious privilege, this deliverance from the yoke of human priest hood and priestcraft, this royal relation to the world of sense, they traced to Jesus. It was He that had made them " a kingdom and priests to God." It was this complex and yet harmonious im- CHAPTEE I. 4-6 33 pression which Jesus had made upon His disciples which explains as nothing else can their frank and simple recognition of Him as Divine. He had " made all things new " — them selves, their relation to the world, their relation to God. Alike in its measure and in its character the work which He had wrought in them and for them was the work of God. To Him, therefore, " be glory and dominion for ever and ever." Tbese are the eternal realities in the presence and consciousness of which St. John proceeds to write his Apocalypse ; and they are the same spiritual realities in the presence of which we are to study it, and also to live our lives and write our own histories. First, God: God as Universal Being, the Absolute and All-mighty ; God as Universal Energy, and specially energy towards righteousness ; but also God in history, God in Christ moving in the affairs of men, making Himself known as Love; and then, human experience of God as mediated through Christ — experience of His mercy, His forgiveness, and His redemption. And as the conviction of these things came to these early Christians, so it comes to us, through Jesus, the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead. THE VISION OF THE SON OF MAN Rev. i. 9-20 I John, your brother and partaker with you in tlie tribulation and kingdom and patience which are in Jesus, was in the isle that is called Patmos, for the word of God and the testimony of Jesus. I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and I heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet saying, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it to the seven churches ; unto Ephesus, and v/nto Smyrna, and unto Pergamum, and wnto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and umto PhiladelpMa, and unto Laodicea. And I turned to see the voice which spake with me. And having turned I saw seven golden candlesticks ; and in the midst of the candlesticks one like unto a son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about at the breasts with a golden girdle. And his head and Ms hair were wMte as white wool, white as snow ; and Ms eyes were as a flame of fire ; and Ms feet Uke unto burnished brass, as if it had been refined in a furnace ; and his voice as the voice of many waters. And he had in Ms right hand seven stars : and out of Ms mouth proceeded a sharp two-edged sword : and Ms countenance was as the sun shimeth in his strength. And when I saw Mm, I fell at Ms feet as one dead. And he laid his right hand upon me, saying, Fear not ; I am the first and the last, and the Living one; and I was dead, and behold, I am alive' for evermore, and I have the keys of death and of Hades. Write therefore the things which thou sawest, and the tMngs which are, and the tMngs 3i CHAPTEE I. 9-20 35 which shall come to pass hereafter; the mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and the seven golden candlesticks. The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches; and the seven candlesticks are seven churches (B.V.). There are few portions of- the earth's surface more rich in historical and religious interest than that which St. John refers to by the name of " Asia." By that he means, of course, not the great continent to which we have extended the name, nor yet what is to-day known as Asia Minor, but the western end of that great peninsula, where the central plateau slopes and breaks down to the Mediterranean Sea. It was to this that the Eomans gave the name of " Asia " when they made it one of ih6 provinces of their Empire, a name which has gradually extended until now it covers the whole continent to the far east of Siberia. For many centuries, down to the occupation of the country by the Turks, which is as the pouring of the sands of the desert on a fertile land, this Asia had fulfilled the destiny marked out for her by Nature as the most con venient bridge between East and West. Trade rolled down its valleys in an opulent stream, to find the shipping of Greece and Eome awaiting it in the safe harbours of Smyrna and Ephesus ; the" valued products of two continents found their place of meeting and exchange along its coasts, 36 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION and, as wealth has never grown so fast as through the handling of this kind of traffic, Asia was for long one of the richest portions of the ancient world, studded with large and prosperous cities, the homes of luxury and comfort. It is not with out reason that to i^iis day Croesus, one of its kings, and Pactolus, one of its rivers, are pro verbial for boundless wealth and prosperity. In this outwardly favoured land the seed of the Gospel had been early sown, had taken root, and sprung up in Christian communities which were found in most of the great cities, in Smyrna, Ephe- sus,Pergamum, andTroas.inLaodicea, Hierapolis, Thyatira, and Sardis, in Philadelphia and Colossae. And among the men to whom these communities of believers in Christ looked up with reverence as having seen, heard, and known the Master in the days of His flesh, was this John, whether he were John the Elder, or, as remains more probable, John the Apostle, the son of Zebedee. Persecution had broken out against these Christians — perse cution the cause and character of which we shall have opportunity to examine later. They had suffered even unto blood, and many who had escaped the sword were banished, at least for a time, among them this John. Banishment, and especially to the mines, was a favourite measure with tyrannical governors of the period. Tacitus writing of this period says : " The sea was thickly CHAPTEE I. 9-20 37 strewn with exiles, the crags were stained with the blood of victims." The scene of John's banishment was Patmos, an island some thirty miles round, which lies off the coast about fifteen miles from Ephesus. Thither the exiles were sent to work in the mines or marble quarries. And there John had his vision of the Son of Man. There is something peculiarly touching in the manner in which he introduces the account of what he had seen. Even this great privilege had not altered the tender and brotherly relation, in which he stood to those whom he addressed : "I John, who also am your brother," not as lording it over God's heritage, though he had seen Christ, and received authority from Him to speak. He claims no superiority of age or privilege — " your brother, and fellow-partaker," in what? In tribulation? Yes, and more: in the tribulation and the kingdom — that is, in the twofold and in divisible experience of the tribulation which Christ said they should have "in the world," and the "kingdom" which He also said His Father would give unto them, the kingdom which was not of this world. " In the tribulation and kingdom" they were fellow-partakers, because they were partakers also in the patience by which Christ had said that they would win their souls. And all three, the tribulation and the kingdom 38 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION and the patience, were held together in one harmonious whole " in Jesus." Christ was the sphere in which they lived and moved and had their being. Tribulation did not undermine their patience ; the kingdom did not make it un necessary. This was life, and it was a life of brotherhood, of inner peace and of assured triumph for the end. This was the temper and this the experience of the man who saw the Vision. He had left Patmos ere he wrote this account of it ; at least, that is the more probable explana tion of his 'words; But the whole thing is still vivid to his memory. It was the Lord's day, honoured in the hearts of those who knew the Lord, the first day of the week, which those Christians who had seen Jesus, treated with equal respect, and hailed with even greater gladness than the seventh day, the Sabbath of their fathers. It was not likely to be a holiday in the mines. ' The Eomans had small respect for such superstitions. But it was a holy day in the Apostle's heart. Was it not the Lord's day, the day of the week when he had run with Peter to the tomb where they had seen their Master laid, to find it open and empty ? — the day when He had made Himself known to them as alive from the dead ? — their Eedeemer that dieth no more, and at once all their shattered hopes were revived and CHAPTEE I. 9-20 39 restored, for they beheld in Him a Prince and a Saviour, one who had indeed loosed them from their sins and made them as kings and priests unto God. All these experiences had swept back through John's memory as he rose that Lord's day, and flooded all his soul with a sense of peace and the presence of God. In rapt and joyous contem plation of all that the day recalled, he passed into a trance of ecstatic adoration. He was " in the Spirit," the life of sense suspended, heaven open before the eye of faith. Like St. Paul, he might have said : " Whether in the body or out of the body I cannot tell ; God knoweth ; " but this he knew, that he saw and heard the Lord, the living and exalted Christ. That is the central and un impeachable fact of John's experience. In the description of his vision which follows it is interesting and not unimportant to observe what features are absolutely new, and what had already found place in inspired descriptions of the vision of God or of the expected Messiah, and so might be already in John's mind. For as a man's waking thoughts do often provide part at least of the detail and colouring of his dreams, so it may have been with this vision. John's waking thoughts of Christ may thus have contributed features either to what he saw or to the subse quent description of the vision. And if we only' take a good reference Bible, and turn up the 40 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION passages referred to in the margin here, it is quickly evident how many and how close are the parallels with the language of the Old Testament. When John " heard behind him a great voice as of a trumpet," it was as when Ezekiel says: "Then the Spirit took me up, and I heard behind me a voice of a great rushing." When he saw One whose "head and his hair were white as white wool, white as snow," he saw a figure identical in appearance with that which had been seen by Daniel, when "the Ancient of Days did sit, whose raiment was white as snow, and the hairs of his head like pure wool." The eyes "as a flame of fire," the feet "like burnished brass," the voice " like the voice of many waters," all find their parallels in the visions of Messiah recorded by older prophets. And even the two- edged sword proceeding out of the mouth is but a symbolic picture of the Word of God, "sharper than any two-edged sword," with which according to Jewish expectation the Messiah was to destroy the heathen. These and other phrases in the description, in which we seem to hear echoes of Old Testament prophecies regarding the Christ, only serve when recognised to throw into higher relief the points in which the vision stands in startling contrast with all that had been thought or seen before. And these are two. First, the seven candlesticks in the midst of which the CHAPTEE I. 9-20 41 Lord is seen, and second, the words in which He describes Himself. As to the second of these features, the language in which the Lord describes Himself : " Fear not " — the words which He had used on more than one well-remembered occasion in His earthly life — are followed by others which no mere man could use: "I am the first and the last and the living one" — applying to Himself the very phrase which in the eighth verse comes from the lips of God : " I am the Alpha and the Omega, saith the Lord, the Almighty." And in order that there may be no mistake as to the claim here made by the risen Christ, He goes on to say : " I have the keys of death and of Hades." The full significance of these last words is only realised if we recall the fact that it was part of the well-known teaching of the Jewish doctors, that " the keys of four things are in the hands of God alone," and these things were Life and the Grave, Food and Eain. When John heard Jesus saying: " I have the keys of death and Hades," he heard Him using words which, according to all his early training and thinking, were proper to God alone. We have here, therefore, another and a striking illustration of the fact that in spite of all his inbred monotheism, in defiance of all his traditional theology, John and those for whom he speaks and writes had given to the 42 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION Jesus of history a place not second even to that of God. So great, so overwhelming was the impression He had made on them by His personality in life, and by His victory over death. But the central thing in the vision is this figure of the Son of Man, such as John had seen Him once upon the Mount of Transfiguration when " His face did shine as the sun," like to Jesus of Nazareth, and yet with a Divine unlike- ness. " He is seen arrayed not, as in the days of His ministry, in the short seamless tunic and the flowing cloak wliich formed the common dress of His time, but in the long robe reaching to the feet, that had been the special garment of the High Priest." He wears the visible emblem of His atoning office for mankind. And He is girded with a golden girdle, " not as of one who toils and runs, fastened round the waist, but around the heart as of one who has entered into the repose of sovereignty." He wears the visible emblem of His royal rule over men. He stands there as Priest and King, and in His hand He holds the seven stars, while round about Him are set the seven golden lamp-stands or candlesticks. Here we meet a feature in the vision to which no parallel can be found. The earlier literature, both of the prophets and the extra-canonical books, has been searched in vain for anything CHAPTEE I. 9-20 43 that would throw light on these symbols. They belong wholly to this vision. And the explana tion of them is that given in the twentieth verse : "The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches: and the seven candlesticks are seven churches." This of course raises the question, What are we to understand by " the angels of the churches " ? and that is by no means easy to answer. On the one hand, it has been thought by many that " angel" is the name for a repre sentative man, or body of men, the rulers, elders, or bishop of each particular congregation. Against this have to be set the facts that the word " angel " is never used in the New Testament of a human being, except in two cases, where it means simply "messenger " : that it is not certain that at the time when these letters were written the develop ment of Church government in Asia Minor had reached the point where one individual stood out at the head of the community as its representative and ruler ; and that when we come to consider the letters themselves we shall find that the "angel" to whom each letter is addressed is identified with his Church as partaker of its character and also of its destiny to a degree which could not be predicated of any human representa tive. In fact, so far as the contents of the letters are concerned, each one of them might as well be directed to the particular Church itself as to " the 44 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION angel" of the Church. The meaning of the address seems rather to be found in connection with the idea of " guardian angels," of angels as representatives in heaven of individuals and com munities on earth. There is authority for the idea in our Lord's words regarding the children ; that " their angels do behold the face of my Father." On this suggestion the angel of each Church would be its heavenly counterpart and representative, the composite personality of the Church as seen by God. In the vision each of these angels is symbolised by a star. These stars, the heavenly symbols of the Churches, are held in the hand of the risen Lord, and He moves among the candlesticks which represent the Churches themselves. That was what John saw in Patmos on the Lord's day. Its significance becomes clear as soon as the purpose for which it was vouchsafed is understood. These Christian communities, which for some reason not discoverable by us were selected out from the Churches of Asia, were, like their neighbours, in most imminent danger. And the danger was of more kinds than one. They were threatened from without with a renewal of the persecution they had already undergone, but renewal in a fiercer and more organised form. As we shall see later, the State was no longer merely the agent giving CHAPTEE I. 9-20 45 effect to the hostility of the Jews or heathen to whose religious prejudices the presence of the Christians was offensive. The Eoman State had itself set up a religion which was utterly abhorrent to all Christian sentiment and belief. The deification of the reigning Emperor, mad as it seems to us, had become part of the Provincial administration, and especially in the Province of Asia the worship of the Eoman Emperor as God had been taken up by the populace with enthusiasm, and was being enforced by the Government as the duty of every loyal subject. Times of cruel searching and sifting were evidently at hand, when the genuineness of every Christian's loyalty to the one and only God would be tested as by fire. And the Churches were but ill pre pared for such a test. For there was danger to their vitality from within. They had been invaded in various degrees by laxity and coldness, by false doctrine and the example of base sur render to heathen standards, by divisions and party spirit; arid every true disciple of Jesus must have been looking forward to the future with foreboding, if not with dismay. To John, whose relations with these Churches gave him both influence and responsibility, there came by means of this vision the command to write what should brace the faith and steel the courage of these communities to face the coming trial, 46 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION and the vision itself was intended and calculated in the first place to brace his own faith and steel his own courage. It was a vision of the things that are, the unseen things which really count in the history of men, calculated to counteract for ever afterwards the impression of things as they seem. What seemed to be the case was that each of these Christian communities was lost as a drop in the surrounding ocean of worldliness and hostility to God, isolated from its neighbours many miles away across the hills, far from help and at the mercy of men. What was really true, as revealed to the Apostle in his vision, was that each of these Churches formed part of a perfect whole represented by the mystic number seven, that all of them were held together by the unseen presence in their midst of the risen Son of Man, that each of these Churches as it was seen by God was held in the hand of Him who is mighty to save, who holds the keys of death and of Hades. And John sets the record of his vision here in the forefront of his book, partly because it gives the explanation of his call to write, and partly because this is characteristic of his method, and indeed the great service he has rendered to the Church. The key to time is eternity. Human life transacts itself, as it were, upon a stage, and only finds its true meaning and value when seen CHAPTEE I. 9-20 47 against the true background, the background of things that are. To the ordinary observer, unin- structed by the Spirit in the mind of God, it may seem as though there iWere nothing but a flat curtain just behind the figures on the stage, and for him both men and their actions and their ^sufferings lose their true proportions. But John, the inspired man, sees through the veil, sees the illimitable distance beyond, the whole, of which each man's brief part upon the stage is but a fraction, the eternal which gives its true value to what is in time. And, further, he sees the figure of Christ central and dominating, already the interpretation of much in the experience of His people, but also Author of that deathless hope in the power of which they might face the rest without interpretation. We shall have taken a great step towards the understanding of this book if we realise that through all its details it is this single and commanding im pression which John has received through the vision of the Son of Man, Christ living, supreme, aware, and caring for His Churches, holding them, in fact, in His hand. What he saw as a whole, the here and the beyond, the temporal and the eternal, he has necessarily to describe in succession, first the one and then the other ; but always with the conviction that what governs, interprets, and even justifies, the 48 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION present is the eternal. No threats can dismay, no danger can cow, no temptation can over master those who have seen with him the Son of Man ever moving through the circle of com munities which form His Church — nay, holding them as a circlet of brilliants in His hand. Nought can make them afraid ; for they endure as seeing the invisible. THE LETTEE TO THE CHUECH AT EPHESUS Rev. ii. 1-7 These things saith he that holdeth the seven stars in Ms right hand, he that walketh in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks : I know thy works, and thy toil and patience, and that thou canst not bear evil men, and didst try them wMch call themselves apostles, and they are not, and didst find them false; and thou hast patience and didst bear for my name's sake, and hast not grown weary. But I have tMs against thee, that thou didst leave thy first love. Bemember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works ; or else I come to thee, and will move thy candlestick out of its place, except thou repent. But this thou hast, that thou hatest the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate. Ble that hath an ear, let Mm hear what the Spirit saith to the churches. To Mm that overcometh, will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the Paradise of God (B.V.). The letters to the Seven Churches form a distinct and well-marked section of this book, and have often been studied separately. And yet they are closely connected with what has gone before and with much that follows. Each one of them is 5 « 50 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION written at the express command of the Son of Man whom the Apostle saw in his vision, and is, in fact, written in His name. And it is to all of these same Churches that John has been instructed to send "a book " containing an account of what he has seen : this instruction he carries out in the chapters' which follow the letters. The principles which they illustrate are woven into the texture of the whole work, and much of their symbolism has a common source with that which appears later. But even taken by themselves the letters offer a fascinating subject of study, and afford some of the most interesting glimpses that we get into Christian life towards the end of the first century, and not a few most valuable sug gestions for Christian life in the beginning of the twentieth. It is at once apparent that all the seven letters are constructed on a common plan. Each one of them opens with the same command to write " to the angel of the Church " : followed by the intro ductory words, "These things saith." Each letter then proceeds to describe the Speaker under one aspect of His power, one which is quoted from the description of the Figure seen in the vision of the first chapter. Each Church addressed is then characterised in a sentence or two beginning, " I know," and there follows an exhortation fitted to the circumstances and CHAPTEE II. 1-7 51 character of the Church ; and each letter culmi nates in a promise "to him that overcometh." In the first three cases this precedes, in the last four it follows, a solemn appeal for attention: " He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith to the churches." Within a frame work so carefully constructed and so precisely followed, the variable elements in each letter are so exquisitely adjusted to the history, circum stances, and character of each several Church that we seem to get "its very form and pressure" reproduced on a perfectly plastic surface. Brief as the letters are, each one of them presents as in a clear-cut cameo the portrait of the Church addressed. And every trait which is added from without to our knowledge of the history, topo graphy, or idiosyncrasy of the particular Church, only confirms the wonderful accuracy of the portrait. The delineation of these features as they have been preserved in the landscape, the annals and the archaeological remains of the several localities, has recently been achieved with unequalled fulness and accuracy by Professor W- M. Eamsay, to whose book, The Letters to . the Seven Churches, every student of the subject should refer. We should, however, do less than justice to the value of these letters if we allowed our selves to overlook the second aspect in which 52 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION they are as remarkable as in the first. Each of the Churches is individualised in [the most effective way; but each of them is also addressed in a representative capacity, and all together stand for the whole Church, reflecting the strength and weakness, the victories and shortcomings which characterise the Church of Christ wherever it may be found. It is possible that, as Mr. Eamsay thinks, each Church to which a letter is sent is to be looked on as the head and centre of a group of local Churches : and yet the writer " does not think of the Smyrna group when he addresses Smyrna, nor is he think ing of the Universal Church : he addresses Smyrna alone : he has it clear before his mind, with all its special qualities and individualities. Yet the group which had its centre in Smyrna and the whole Universal Church alike found that the letter which was written for Smyrna applied equally to them, for it was a statement of eternal truths and universal principles." " The idea that the individual Church is part of the Universal Church, that it stands for it after the usual symbolic fashion of the Apocalypse, is never far from the writer's mind ; and he passes rapidly between the two points of view, the direct address to the local Church as an individual body with special needs of its own, and the general application and apostrophe to the entire CHAPTEE II. 1-7 53 Church as symbolised by the particular local Church." * Ephesus, to the Church in which city the first of these letters is sent, stood foremost among the seven in rank, in historical importance, and in wealth. But in no one of these features on which she prided herself was her superiority unchallenged. Planted at the sea-end of one of the great -trade-routes from the East, and owing everything to this favourable position, she had watched for centuries the slow silting up of the harbour on which her trade depended, and the growth of a younger rival in Smyrna, some fifty miles to the north. But Ephesus was not entirely dependent upon her trade and commercial supre macy ; she was the political capital of the Eoman Province, and even more distinguished in the eyes of her inhabitants and neighbours by having within her walls the famous Temple of Artemis, " Diana of the Ephesians," of whom we hear so much in the Acts of the Apostles. This venerated shrine attracted year by year many thousands of pilgrims, and therefore no little wealth, to the city. The strategic importance of such a centre for the missionary work of the Church had been promptly recognised by St. Paul, who laboured longer at Ephesus than at any other town in Asia Minor. And the result was that he left * See Ramsay, loc. cit., pp. 200, 206. 54 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION behind him a Church the fame of which in Christendom matched the fame of the city in the political world.* "To the angel of the church at Ephesus" — that is, to its heavenly counterpart and respon sible representative. In modern language the angel of the Church is in each case that Church's better self — that self which is stimulated to con sciousness whenever God's voice is truly heard by it.' Just as "the entrance of his word" giveth light to our own better selves, so Christ by this address seeks to waken the Church's better self to activity and effectiveness. And what He says falls into three parts — Eec6gnition, Warning, and Promise. First comes the Eecognition: "I know thy works." The same words are used to five out of the seven Churches. As another New Testa ment writer puts it, " God is not unrighteous to forget your work and the love which ye showed towards his name." The "works" in this case are further defined as "thy toil and patience," and the meaning of the whole is well illustrated in the expanded phrase used by St. Paul in writing to the Thessalonians — "remembering your work of faith and labour of love and patience of hope." Their "toil" is active and laborious * Ignatius speaks of the Church at Ephesus as " renowned to all ages." CHAPTEE II. 1-7 55 effort to resist and overcome evil; their "patience" the steadfast endurance of pressure and persecu tion in the cause of Christ. Poor little Church of some few hundreds gathered out of the many thousands in the great city, passing cautiously through the streets to their place of meeting, prepared to meet persecution yet not courting it ; labouring with zeal and faith to make known to others the good news which they had received, that "God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself " ; putting up with the disabilities of their new relation to the world, its contempt, its dislike, its hostility, its possible cruelty; bearing all this with patient endurance " as seeing him who is invisible," and yet wondering sometimes what is to be the end of it, what is the good of it how. For Ephesus goes on pretty much as before, with its frivolity and revelries, its immoralities and indifference. The Temple of Artemis is thronged as ever ; the processions of its votaries sweep through the streets. The frequent salutation from Christian lips, " Maranatha " (" the Lord cometh "), sometimes rings hollow with the consciousness of hope too long deferred. "As things have been they remain." Who is, after all, the better for their toil and patience ? Who cares, in Ephesus ? To such thoughts the answer comes, "I know thy works." Every act of faith, every ministry of self-denial, every 56 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION humble acceptance of the Cross for the Master's sake, finds its recognition from the Master's eye, has its record in heaven. And these Christians at Ephesus had one quality which called for special acknowledgment — that which St. Paul refers to as the power to discern spirits, to distinguish between what was false and true in that which claimed to come from God. This gift was one for which there was special need at a time when many were taking it upon themselves to instruct Christ's flock, while as yet there was no established standard of Christian faith and practice. The number of men was by this time very consider able, who exercised a Christian ministry, apostolic or prophetic, on the ground that they had received the gifts of the Spirit for the purpose. Many, doubtless, had received a call from God similar to that which had led to the ordination of Paul and Barnabas. But there were others who had no such authority for their ministry, who had been moved by personal motives of varying degrees of unworthiness to exercise the ministry without having received a true call. The young Churches were continually being visited by strangers who professed to be Apostles or Prophets of Christ, and they needed to be always on their guard against the intrusion of false teachers and false doctrine. In his general Epistle St. John makes CHAPTEE II. 1-7 57 both the situation and the warning clear: "Be lieve not every spirit, but try'the spirits, whether they are of God ; because many false prophets are gone out into the world." In these circumstances a Christian Church could hardly have higher testimony borne to it than this : " Thou didst try them which call themselves apostles, and they are not, and thou didst find them false." The Church of Ephesus knew the real messengers of Christ when it heard them: the others it recognised in their true character, and would have nothing to do with them. The whole situation is brought out very clearly, and the favourable judgment here passed on Ephesus is strikingly confirmed, in another letter written to the same Church twenty or thirty years later, by Ignatius, bishop and martyr. A few quotations from this letter will speak for themselves : " Some are wont of malicious guile to hawk about the Name." " I have learned that certain persons passed through you from yonder, bringing evil doctrine : whom ye suffered not to sow seed in you, for ye stopped your ears, so that ye might not receive the seed sown by them." " Now Onesimus of his own accord highly praiseth your orderly conduct in God, for that ye all live according to truth, and that no heresy hath a home among you: nay, you do not so much as listen to any one, if he speak of aught 58 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION else save concerning Jesus Christ in truth." There we have both the presence of the false teachers and the firm way in which they were ignored by the Ephesian Christians. And from the same pen we have testimony to those other qualities in the Church which are touched upon in this letter. Ignatius, on his way to martyr dom, writes: "I ought to be trained by you for the contest, in faith, in admonition, in endurance, in long-suffering." It would be very interesting if we could know with certainty who these false teachers were, and what was the nature of their teaching. What is most probable is, that they were men of the same school as those who dogged the footsteps of St. Paul, professing to be apostles of Christ, but in reality emissaries of the Judaising party at Jerusalem. If so, the burden of their teaching would be that men must needs become Jews in becoming disciples of Christ, and so were bound to " keep the whole law." They wouldtbe repre sentatives of the party with whom the Apostle of the Gentiles deals so trenchantly in his Epistle to the Galatians, desiring to bring Christ's people once more into bondage under ordinances, and impugning the liberty wherewith Christ had made them free. And when the Church at Ephesus would have none of such teachers, they showed that they had within themselves the Spirit of CHAPTEE II. 1-7 59 Christ, a sure touchstone of the truth of the Gospel. But even a Church which invites such recogni tion of its works and its faithfulness does not escape criticism, and incurs serious warning. " I have this against thee, that thou hast left thy first love." These people were still doing the works, but the inner fire had burnt low, and the works themselves, even though outwardly the same, were not now " the first works " in the eye of God. The external evidence of their faith was like the pointer on a self-registering thermo meter: it marked the highest level which their spiritual temperature had reached; but where was the mercury now? We may take it that there never was a community of Christians, of some years' standing, perhaps there never was an individual Christian, to whom at some time or other the Spirit of Christ had not this re monstrance to address : " Thou hast left thy first love." It may be that many at least of the works which were prompted by that first love are still being done ; and yet God hath this against us : we have this against ourselves. We say, Where is the blessedness I knew when first I saw the Lord? How, then, does the Spirit deal with this con dition ? As revealed in this letter, in two ways : partly by the utterance of a ^olemn threat, and 60 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION partly by loving counsel. The threat is that the Lord will remove the Church " out of its place," a threat not of destruction, as some have thought, but of material and grievous change. The con dition of this Church is not like that of Laodicea, for example: it is not one which calls for even the threat of extinction ; Ephesus had true love and genuine loyalty, and the threat of Divine discipline would meet the case. There is an interesting and, in many ways, an attractive explanation which has been put forward by Professor Eamsay, based upon a close study of the topography and history of Ephesus. He points out that one characteristic which belongs to Ephesus and distinguishes its history from that of all the other cities, is change. "In most ancient sites one is struck by the immuta bility of Nature and the mutability of all human additions to Nature. In Ephesus it is the shifting character of the natural conditions on which the city depends for prosperity that strikes every careful observer, every student either of history or of Nature. This scenery and this site have varied from century to century. Where there was water, there is now land ; what was a populated city in one period, ceased to be so in another, and has again become the centre of life for the valley ; where at one time there was only bare hillside or the gardens of a city some miles CHAPTEE II. 1-7 61 distant, at another time there was a city crowded with inhabitants, and this has again relapsed into its earlier condition : the harbour in which St. John and St. Paul landed has become a mere marsh, and the theatre where the excited crowd met and shouted to Diana, desolate and ruinous as it is, has been more permanent than the harbour. . . . The city followed the sea, and changed from place to place to maintain its im portance as the only harbour of the valley." * Accordingly, Mr. Eamsay concludes : " A threat of removing the Church from its place would be inevitably understood by the Ephesians as a denunciation of another change in the site of the city, and must have been so intended by the writer." Should a threat of this character seem hardly grave enough for what is here predicted, then we must fall back on the explanation of persecution and the consequent scattering of the Church, which was indeed its fate. The main point is to observe that it is the candlestick, the earthly form of the Church, which is to be moved out of its place; the star remains in the hand of the Eedeemer. For there is at Ephesus, as in nearly every community which names itself by the name of Christ (the case of Laodicea a possible excep tion), an invisible Church, a proportion great or * See Ramsay, loc. cit., p. 245. 62 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION small of those whose names are written in heaven, whose relation to their Saviour cannot be affected even by the scattering of the visible Church. And it is they who will lay both the threat and the counsel to heart. The counsel is to "remember" and "repent." Eemember the early time, " the love of thine espousals." He is the same : He changeth not. His love is great and strong as ever. And thy need of it is as great as ever: nay, it is greater. For the only thing that causes thee to shrink from remem bering is shame — shame that the cares and pleasures of this life have been allowed to choke the good seed, shame that thy love has been unequal to His, less constant, less pure, less strong. And for that shame He and He alone has the remedy. It was concerning an Israel that had sinned her mercies that the Lord pro claimed through Hosea: "I will betroth thee unto me for ever ; yea, I will betroth thee unto me in righteousness and justice, in leal love and tender mercies." Eemember the high privilege from which thou art fallen ; remember it not as lost but as offered to thee by the same pierced hand by which it was at the first bestowed: remember and repent, and do the first works in the enthusiasm of the first love. There remains the promise: and that is con nected in this case with another point which has CHAPTEE II. 1-7 63 been recorded to the credit of the Church at Ephesus, "But this thou hast, that thou hatest the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate." About these Nicolaitans we know practically nothing beyond what can be gathered from allu sions in these letters. In the Century Bible the present writer, following many good authorities, was inclined to regard them as identical with the false teachers previously referred to in this letter, those " which call themselves apostles, and they are not." But on further consideration, it seems more in accordance with all the available evidence to see in the false apostles and the Nicolaitans two distinct and, indeed, antithetical forces which endangered the purity of the Church from opposite sides. "Ye must keep the whole law of Moses," said the intruders from the side of Judaism. " Nay," said the Christians of Ephesus, who had drunk in Paul's teaching, "not so, for Christ hath made us free from the law." "If that be so," said another party, the Nicolaitans, "then let us use our freedom, let us show that we are above the law, by living as we please." And so they threatened to turn the liberty of the Gospel into an excuse for all manner of libertinism and immorality. These two tendencies were the Scylla and Charybdis between which the Church of the first century had to find the middle path of safety. And the true Christian standard which 64 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION prevailed at Ephesus enabled the Church there to perceive the falsehood of this extreme also : as they rejected the teaching of the false teachers, so they hated the works of the Nicolaitans. Not that they were not tempted, some of them by the lust of the flesh, tempted to think that these Nicolaitans were right, and that a Christian might do with impunity what for another man was sin. But they had "an unction from the Holy One," and they knew that this was not the mind of Christ. The form which this temptation took gives its form to the promise with which the letter closes. Were they tempted by this diabolical attempt to legitimise the worst of human passions, tempted by the desire to gratify carnal appetites regard less of the moral law, let them continue to resist, understanding that he that doeth evil is evil, whatever he may believe. Let them continue to fight manfully in this conflict, and " to him that overcometh" shall be given "to eat of the tree of life," of fruit which is not as the fruit of Sodom, but prepared by God for the true and perfect satisfaction of human nature's needs. The Nicolaitans are not extinct. • Our modern cities are as hospitable to them as Ephesus or any of the cities of the Eoman Empire. They have many avenues of insidious approach for their nauseous doctrines. For the young, CHAPTEE II. 1-7 65 especially, they lie in wait, urging that self- indulgence in natural appetite cannot be wrong, daring even to charge upon God the evil results of such self-indulgence. They spread snares of every kind for the unwary and the unwarned, even inventing ways to rouse "the beast in man." The only safeguard is to hate all such instigations to evil, to hate as Christ hates them ; and then to claim from Him the fulfilment of this great promise, to him that overcometh. " I will give him to eat of the tree of life," of the tree whose fruit does satisfy, of the tree whose satisfaction endures : all else turns to ashes : this fulfilment of desire which comes from the hand of God is both perfect and eternal. THE LETTEE TO THE CHUECH AT SMYRNA Rev. ii. 8-11 These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and lived again : I know thy tribulation and thy poverty (but thou art rich), and the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and they are not, but are a synagogue of Satan. Fear not the things wMch thou art about to suffer : behold, the devil is about to cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days. Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee tlie crown of life. He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith to the churches. He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death (B.V.). Smyrna is the only one of the seven cities to which these letters are addressed which remains to this day a place of importance. The sites on which the others stood are now either vacant or occupied only by a few mud-houses in the midst of ancient ruins. But the traveller to Smyrna finds a large and flourishing town, with a population of a quarter of a million or more, and the centre of a wide-reaching and productive 66 CHAPTEE II. 8-11 67 commerce. It is said, indeed, to be the most solidly prosperous city within the Turkish Empire, and the reason of its prosperity is at least partially disclosed in the fact that by the Turks it is called " Ismid Giaour," Smyrna the heathen : in other words, its population is largely composed of those who profess Christianity and are at least pene trated with Christian ideas. There is, however, a natural cause besides for this prosperity, which has lasted now for more than two thousand years, and that is the situation of the city at the top of a great land-locked bay or gulf, in which great fleets could lie in safety, and also at the lower end of one of the great river-valleys which strike up from the coast into the heart of Asia Minor. Thus, Smyrna was hardly second to Ephesus as an emporium of trade, and indeed vaunted itself so highly that it carried on a long struggle both with Ephesus on the south and with Per- gamum on the north for the coveted title of "First City in Asia." Of its early religious history we know very little beyond the fact that as Ephesus was famous for its devotion to Artemis and for the splendour of her temple there, so Smyrna was the special home of the cult of Dionysus, the god of vintage and of revelry. But there is in the Eoman historian Tacitus a passage which throws an interesting light on the religious as well as the 68 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION political situation in Smyrna in the first century. The relation of the Province of Asia to Eome was roughly that of India to Grea* Britain : and then, as now, the dependency not infrequently sought to show its loyalty and to secure the Imperial favour by the erection of monuments or public buildings. In the year 23 a.d. the cities of Asia had obtained leave to erect in one of them a temple in honour of Tiberius, and three years later they all sent commissioners to Eome to plead their respective claims to furnish the site. " The Emperor," says Tacitus, " in order to turn away public attention from a scandal," frequently attended the Senate, and on several days listened to the ambassadors from Asia argu ing as to which city should be the one where the temple was to be erected. Eleven cities were en gaged in the contest, equally ambitious, but not equally important. Situated not far apart from one another they laid stress on their antiquity and their loyalty to Eome. But Laodicea, Tralles, Troas, and some others were passed over at once, as not sufficiently important. There was more hesitation about Halicarnassus, which for twelve hundred years had been undisturbed by any earth quake: Pergamum was rejected on the very ground put forward as a ground of claim — that it had already a temple of Augustus. Ephesus and Miletus were already too closely associated CHAPTEE II. 8-11 69 with the ritual and worship of Diana and Apollo. Only Sardis and Smyrna remained. The Sardian advocates strove hard, pointing to the history of their town, its- early treaty with Eome, the fertilising power of its streams, the wealth of the neighbourhood, and the excellence of the climate. The envoys from Smyrna, however, claimed a yet greater antiquity, a loyalty to Eome which stretched yet further back, and special services rendered to a Eoman army in great straits, when the citizens of Smyrna had stripped themselves of their clothing to cover the shivering Eoman troops. So when the vote of the Senate was taken, Smyrna carried the day. Some sixty years had elapsed since that scene in Eome, when John wrote this letter to the Christians in Smyrna ; but the city had not declined either in wealth or in devotion to Eome. And neither its wealth nor the direction of its enthusiasm was favourable to the Christian cause and the Christian people in the city. Poverty and tribulation were the outward marks of the Church there, but its inward marks were stead fastness and the favour of God. It has been already pointed out that the more thoroughly we comprehend the history, the local circumstances, and the social surroundings of each of these Churches, the more are we in a position to appreciate the accuracy of these 70 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION letters, and the exquisite adaptation of every phrase in them, to each special case. Of this a good illustration is found here. Like all the rest, this letter begins with a description of Christ, the Speaker, in a phrase which is taken from the full description of the Son of Man as John had seen Him. And as there is in some of the cases an unmistakable appropriateness in the phrase selected to the circumstances of the Church which is addressed, so it is natural to assume an appropriateness even in those cases where the application is less immediately obvious. To Smyrna Christ speaks as " the first and the last, who was dead, and yet liveth." What could be more appropriate in addressing " an age-long city half as old as time " ? A city where the popula tion prided itself on this very antiquity, and traced its foundation back to the gods them selves. A city where, as the beginning seemed to be lost in the dim past, so the end seemed a thing unthinkable. And yet the Christians in this city set against all this material splendour and this vast duration the conviction that there were higher things, things more precious and more lasting. How difficult it was for them to keep alive this conviction in the face of what men called facts ! "I," with whom you have to do, "I am the first and the last": even before Smyrna was, I am : and when Smyrna is for- CHAPTEE II. 8-11 71 1 gotten, I shall be, the same yesterday, to-day, and for ever. And even the death which must surely overtake each one of you, the martyr's death which awaits some of you, makes no difference. I was dead, and yet live. Neither time and the things of time, nor death and the agonies of death, do alter life for those who have heard My voice, and know Me as their Saviour. Coming to the body of this letter, we find three things made prominent — the outward condition of the Church, its poverty, the inward spirit or temper of the Church, its loyalty, and the final reward of loyalty shown through poverty and tribulation, namely, life. " I know thy tribulation and thy poverty." The tribulation arose partly from the pressure of the world, the constant friction of antagonistic ideas and diverse aims in life, such as was and is inevitable when a Christian com munity is planted in the midst of a heathen population. From organised persecution Smyrna had up to this time been free, but none the less there would be for every true disciple of Jesus a very real bearing of the Cross, a daily call for patience and self-sacrifice, " for the testimony of Jesus." But the tribulation was also due in part to the presence, in large numbers, of Jews who had only a nominal claim to belong to God's Israel, and proved their own righteousness rather 72 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION by attacking the believers in a crucified Messiah than by walking in the law of Moses. It does not appear that these were Jewish Christians, such as troubled the Church at Ephesus : they were Jews by birth and by profession, who had departed so far from the standards of their religion that they no longer deserved the name, while from the standpoint of fierce orthodoxy they reviled the Christians. Such Jews were found by this time in all the chief cities of the empire, a powerful body, and unscrupulous in their hostility to the followers of Christ. But they would appear to have been unusually strong and unusually bitter at Smyrna. For when some fifty years later many Christians perished in the persecution, and amongst them the saintly Poly- carp, it is recorded that the Jews were eager in bringing faggots to the theatre for the burning of the Christians, " sabbath day though it was." Here there was cause enough for " tribulation," and it had to be borne with the added dis advantages of poverty. It is very significant that the Church which, if it does not receive the same positive praise as that of Philadelphia, is at any rate distinct from all the other Churches in receiving no reproach at all, should be also the one marked out from the rest by its poverty. It was a living illustra tion of the beatitude pronounced by Jesus, CHAPTEE II. 8-11 73 " Blessed are ye poor, for yours is the kingdom of heaven." For our Lord does so absolutely reverse the common judgment of the world, that He holds them blessed who are poor in this world's goods. Not that there is any virtue in being poor, or specially attaching to those who are poor, but because as a matter of experience riches, wealth, social security are so great a danger to the higher life of man, because the moral demand made upon a rich man ere he can qualify for the Kingdom of Heaven is so much more severe than that which is felt by the pbor. Many a poor man cries out in the midst of his poverty: "How hard it is to trust God!" and yet he trusts Him. But for the rich man it is not only hard. Christ thought it almost impossible ; because he requires not only to have faith in the unseen, but to have want of faith in the seen, want of faith in that riches the evidence of which is before him every hour, want of faith in his power, although every one round him bows down to it, want of faith in himself, although to human eyes he appears to be the master of his circumstances. If only men could open their hearts to the conviction that Christ was right in this matter, those who are rich in any form of possession would look on their riches with trembling, and those who are poor would find in the daily looking to the hand of God a 74 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION daily discovery that this is true : " God hath chosen them that are poor as to the world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom which he promised to them that love him." This was the experience of Smyrna. The out ward poverty of the Christians there was accom panied by an inward loyalty to God, so deep and strong that it outweighed their poverty, and overcame their tribulation — nay, might be trusted to overcome the further tribulation which was looming in the near future. For their Lord would not conceal from them that more and greater trouble was to come. In their case tribulation had wrought patience, and patience had brought about a condition of testedness, in which they could bear with equanimity even the announcement of new trials. They were their Lord's friends, and He would not conceal from them what was in His mind : "Ye shall have tribulation ten days." Why " ten days " ? Much thought and in genuity had been spent in the attempt to dis cover the meaning of this and the many other periods of time which are indicated in this book. And as this is the first occasion when such a number is met with, it may be well to consider the general question of the place of numbers in the symbolism of the Apocalypse. It may be said at once that so far as they refer to extension CHAPTEE II. 8-11 75 in time or space, no one of these numbers is to be understood literally. When they refer to objects, the candlesticks, the Churches, the heads and horns of the Monster, the " living creatures," and the like, they are to be taken literally in a sense. That is to say, the Apostle had before his mind in these cases a definite number of objects corresponding to the figure which he gives. In regard to space and time he uses numbers to express rather their character and quality than their extent or duration. One set of numbers* notably three, seven, ten, and twelve, with their multiples, convey the ideas of completeness and satisfaction, and so are associated with the merciful dispensations of God; another set, notably three and a half in various forms and multiples (forty and two months, a thousand two hundred and three score days, a time times and half a time) convey the ideas of broken continuity, imperfection and confusion, and so are associated with the domina tion of wickedness or the punitive dispensations of God. Such numbers in all the Apocalyptic literature have a purely conventional value. A "thousand years" stands for a rounded and complete period of long but unknown duration. " Three and a half years " derives its sinister meaning in part from its being a broken seven, in part from its having been the duration of the 76 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION reign of Antiochus, when "the abomination of desolation " first made its appearance in Jewish experience. It follows that in the ordinary sense of the word there is no chronology to be sought or to be found in this book. " The Seer does not look for ward to age succeeding age or century century. To him the whole period between the first and the second coming of Christ is but ' a little time,' and whatever is to happen in it ' must shortly come to pass.' In truth be can hardly be said to deal with the lapse of time at all. He deals with the essential characteristics of the Divine govern ment in time, whether it be long or short. Shall the revolving years be in our sense short, these characteristics will nevertheless come forth with a clearness which shall leave man without excuse. Shall they be in our sense long, the unfolding of God's eternal plan will be only again and again made manifest."* But it is not only vain to seek to construct a chronology of the future out of the periods men tioned in this book, and thus to establish "the time of the end." It seems perilously like presumption in view of our Lord's specific declaration : "Ye know not the day nor the hour." The time of the end is a secret reserved in the mind of the Most High alone : " Of that day and hour knoweth no * Milligan, Expositor's Bible, p. 112. CHAPTEE II. 8-11 77 man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only." And this was clearly recognised by the Church of the first century, in whose understand ing it was firmly fixed that the day of the Lord would come " as a thief in the night." The per petually recurring admonition to watchfulness would have had no meaning, had it been possible to extort from Scripture the secret of the date when the end would come. Even if we had the material, which we have not, it would not become us to pry into what has been declared to be God's secret : the true attitude of the Christian is that of waiting and watching for his Lord's coming, and that is the attitude which the whole of this book serves to inculcate. The " ten days " of tribulation, then, to which Smyrna is to be exposed are not to be interpreted as describing its precise duration ; the phrase simply announces a period of persecution which is to be brief and definite. The Church at Smyrna could be trusted to receive such an announcement without questioning and without dismay. Her members were sound at heart. They had not made compromise either with false teaching or with libertinism. And the history of the Church within the next half-century showed both the fulfilment of this prediction, and how fully the Lord's confidence in His people was justified. The evidence of this is found in that most 78 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION interesting letter which was sent by the Church at Smyrna to another Church in which an account is given of a fierce persecution which haM broken out, and of the martyrdom of Polycarp, which brought it to a close. " The church of God which sojourneth at Smyrna to the church of God which sojourneth at Philomelium, and to all the holy brotherhoods of the holy and universal church sojourning in every place." "We write unto you, brethren, an account of what befel those that suffered martyrdom and especially the blessed Polycarp, who stayed the persecution; having as it were set his seal upon it by his martyrdom." Then we hear about the steadfast ness of other witnesses to Christ. "The right noble Germanicus encouraged their timorousness through the constancy that was in him ; and he fought with the wild beasts in a signal way. For when the pro-consul wished to prevail upon him, and bade him have pity on his youth, he used violence and dragged the wild beast towards him, desiring the more speedily to obtain a release from their unrighteous and lawless life. So after this all the multitude, marvelling at the bravery of the God-beloved and God-fearing people of the Christians, raised a cry, ' Away with the Atheist : let search be made for Polycarp.' " Then we read how the friends of the aged bishop strove to per suade him, saying : " Why, what harm is there in CHAPTEE II. 8-11 79 saying, Caesar is Lord, and offering incense to his statue, and so saving thyself? " But at first he gave them no answer ; when, however, they per sisted, he said, " I am not going to do what you counsel me"; and when he was brought into the theatre, the magistrate pressed him again, and said : " Swear the oath, and I will release thee : revile the Christ." And Polycarp's reply was : " Fourscore and six years have I been His servant, and He hath done me no wrong: how can I blaspheme my King who saved me?" So he gave his body to be burned, and as his flock put it : " Having by his endurance overcome the un righteous ruler in the conflict, and so received the crown of immortality, he rejoiceth in company with the apostles and all righteous men, and blesseth our Lord Jesus Christ, the Saviour of our bodies and helmsman of our souls, and shepherd of the universal Church." * "Having received the crown of immortality." The Church at Smyrna must have laid to heart the promise with which the letter in the Eevela tion closes. They were used to seeing the victors in the games crowned with the wreath, which was made of perishable leaves ; but for them selves they had learned to look beyond their daily conflict with evil, through the fire and smoke of martyrdom, to a crown of imperishable * See The Martyrdom of Polycarp, Lightfoot's translation. 80 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION glory — a crown which consisted in life for ever more. For them death had no terrors. It had lost that which alone gave it its sting ; for Christ had " loosed them from their sins." The " second death " which the Jews around them thought of as the portion of the wicked after the resurrec tion had no terrors either. The Christ for whom they lived, was the Christ in whom they lived ; and He was alive for evermore. To be absent from the body, therefore, was only to be more really present with the Lord. THE LETTEE TO THE CHUECH AT PEEGAMUM Rev. ii. 12-17 And to the angel of the church at Pergamum write; These things, saith he, that hath the sharp two-edged sword: I know where thou dwellest, even where Satan's throne is; and thou holdest fast my name, and didst not deny my faith, even in the days of Antipas, my witness, my faithful one, who was killed among you, where Satan dwelleth. But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there some that hold the teaching of Balaam, who taught Balak to cast a stumbling-block before the cMldren of Israel, to eat tMngs sacrificed to idols, and to commit fornication. So hast thou also some that hold the teaching of the Nicolaitans in like manner. Bepent, there fore ; or else I come to thee quickly, and I will make war against them with the sword of my mouth. He that hath an ear, let Mm hear what the Spirit saith to tlie churches. To Mm that overcometh, to him will I give to eat of the hidden wanna, and I will give him a white stone, and upon the stone a new name written which no one knoweth but he that receiveth it (B.V.). i The passage from the Annals of Tacitus, which was quoted in the last chapter, illustrates not only the relative claims of the seven cities to recognition by the Eoman State, but also the -f 81 82 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION social and civil significance which the worship of the Emperor bad attained in the first third of the first century. The competition among the Asian cities was for the honour of providing the site for a new temple of the reigning Emperor ; and as this subtle and diabolical amalgam of patriotism, politics, and religion is the subject of repeated allusion in the Apocalypse, its origin and its meaning require to be noted. It began - in a natural and, granted the polytheism on which it rested, a comparatively harmless way. The population of Western Asia Minor had always been notorious for its superstitious cha racter, the avidity with which it welcomed new deities and new forms of worship, and for the fanatical enthusiasm with which it abandoned itself to religious excitement. Eome, as a political power, stood to these people very much as Britain stands to many parts of India ; and just as in India we find some of the native peoples doing a kind of homage to what they call the British Raj, just as some of them have even gone the length of paying Divine honours to the name of one at least of our great administrators (John Nicholson), so the natives of "Asia" looked with something more than reverence on the great civilising power of the West, and were ready enough to conceive of the ruling sovereign in distant Eome as something more than man. CHAPTEE II. 12-17 83 The initiative, however, came from the side of the Eoman rulers themselves. The claim had been advanced by, or for, Julius Caesar that he was descended from the goddess Venus Genitrix ; and an obsequious assembly at Ephesus had pronounced him to be " god made manifest, the son of Ares and Aphrodite." His successor, Augustus, was the object of yet more intense devotion as the Saviour of the civilised world, and a kind of incarnation of the genius of Eome. " In the condition of human thoughts and religious conceptions that then prevailed, such an intense feeling must take a religious form. Whatever deeply affected the minds of a body of men, few or many, inevitably assumed a religious character. No union or association of any kind was then possible except in a common religion, whose ritual expressed the common feelings and purpose. Thus the growth of an Asian Provincial religion of Eome and the Em peror was natural." * The material forms which this Emperor- worship took included the erection of temples and the es tablishment of priestly guilds for their service. The first of these temples to be erected in Asia was fixed at Pergamum, and had been increasing in importance and prestige for over a hundred years when this letter was written. Pergamum * See Ramsay, loc. cit., p. 118. 84 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION had been selected as the site for this temple because it was historically and officially the capital of the province. During the first Christian century it was being slowly ousted from its primacy through the growing importance vof Ephesus and Smyrna, both of which were geographically better situated for the purposes of commerce. But Pergamum had been the royal city of ancient native kings, and situated as it was on a magnificent hill "standing out boldly in the level plain, and dominating the valley and mountain on the south," it was also a " royal city " to behold ; and it remained at least till the end of this century the seat of Eoman government, and the residence of the Pro-consul of Asia/ These two features, Pergamum, the seat of the Provincial government, and Pergamum, the site of the oldest and most famous temple of Emperor-worship, provide at once the key to the situation of the Church in that city, and the clue to several phrases in this letter. "Thus saith he that hath the sharp two- edged sword." Again we have in the phrase here chosen to describe the author of the letter, one selected from the description of the Son of Man in the first chapter, and the appropriate ness of the choice is obvious. At Pergamum dwelt the Eoman Governor, the one man in Asia who CHAPTEE II. 12-17 85 had what the Eomans called the jus gladii, the power of the sword, the power of life and death. It was to Pergamum, therefore, that prisoners were taken, including such as were accused of being Christians, in order that they might undergo the sentence and suffering of death. The message to Pergamum comes, therefore, from the one, "who hath the sharp two-edged sword," to indicate the fact that behind the Eoman Governor and above him, is One whose authority is mightier still, by whose will princes do govern, and to whom even the tyrants of the earth are responsible. By this phrase the trembling Church of Pergamum is bidden to look past the threatening world-power, and to fix its gaze on the King of kings, who is " mighty to save." In like manner the description of the Church as dwelling " where Satan's throne is " conveys an allusion to the prevailing cult of the Emperor. This had reached its climax in the reign of Domitian, within which these letters were prob ably written. It was Domitian who insisted on being addressed by his subjects as " our Lord and God," and at the same time the Provincial government had discovered the value for its own purposes of fostering and extending this monstrous worship of a man. By its means they obtained a new and very effective instru- 86 THE BOOK OF EEVELATION ment for controlling their subject races. They skilfully identified submission to the civil power with religion, and made conformity to the ritual a test of loyalty to the State. The heathen subjects of Eome found no difficulty in enlarging their Pantheon to include another god, in paying their dues in the temple of the Emperor as well as in those of Diana or .