rnHHW-M, JH'J Pffli U! WWlBHPWWpww; THE CAMBRIDGE BIB] FOE SCHOOLS #** LI iqi -liu J St •lUatiMl.'MU I THE EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS EDITED OY H.C.G. MOULE. M.'Av PA.nigw ,WMi»MiH»BWlj* iiWinmimmaMnftfE'a^^^^i- h 'GENERAL EDITOR • w» w» BISHOP OF WORCESTER WWBM8»B»CMWtWgMWWWM**'"M"'»alr*l»M«WMT«''W-WS..^^ "/gilt theft Booh Vfs*tiie.f!>ulndh% of a ¦Ccaegt: MitijXolin ILIIIBII&SJlilf DIVINITY SCHOOL TROWBRIDGE LIBRARY GIFT OF The Rev. J.F. Chenoweth Cjje CamWtifle Bible for i^jjaote anti Colleges* THE EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS. 2on&on: C. J. CLAY and SONS, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE^ AVE MARIA LANE. Ksmititse: DEIGHTON, BELL AND CO. Eeipjig: F. A. BROCKHAUS. £Efo gorfe: MACMILLAN AND CO. %fyt Camfcrttnje 3SftIe for ^e&ools anti Colleges* General Editor :— J. J. S. PEROWNE, D.D., Bishop of Worcester. THE EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS, WITH INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY THE REV. H. C. G. MOULE, M.A. PRINCIPAL OF RIDLEY HALL, AND LATE FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE. EDITED FOR THE SYNDICS OF THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. ©ambrtu-ge : AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 1893 \AU Rights reserve* Camforttige "PRINTED BY C. J. CLAY M.A. AND SONS AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS PREFACE BY THE GENERAL EDITOR. The General Editor of The Cambridge Bible for Schools thinks it right to say that he does not hold himself responsible either for the interpretation of particular passages which the Editors of the several Books have adopted, or for any opinion on points of doctrine that they may have expressed. In the New Testament more especially questions arise of the deepest theological import, on which the ablest and most conscientious interpreters have differed and always will differ. His aim has been in all such cases to leave each Contributor to the unfettered exercise of his own judgment, only taking care that mere controversy should as far as possible be avoided. He has contented himself chiefly with a careful revision of the notes, with pointing out omissions, with 6 PREFACE. suggesting occasionally a reconsideration of some question, or a fuller treatment of difficult passages, and the like. Beyond this he has not attempted to interfere, feeling it better that each Commentary should have its own individual character, and being convinced that freshness and variety of treatment are more than a compensation for any lack of uniformity in the Series. CONTENTS. PAGES I. Introduction. Chapter I. Ephesus: Asia: St Paul's connexion with Ephesus 9—16 Chapter II. St Paul at Rome: occasion and date of the Epistle 16—22 Chapter III. Authenticity of the Epistle 22 — 24 Chapter IV. In what sense was the Epistle ad dressed to the Ephesians? 24 — 29 Chapter V. Parallels between the Epistle to the Ephesians and the Epistle to the Colossians 29 — 32 Chapter VI. The Charge of St Paul to the Ephesian Elders : the Epistles to Timothy : the Apocalyptic Epistle to the Ephe sian Angel 32 — 33 Chapter VII. Argument of the Epistle 33 — 40 II. Text and Notes 43 — 164 III. Appendices 165 — 172 IV. Index 173— '75 The Text adopted in this Edition is that of Dr Scrivener's Cambridge Paragraph Bible. A few variations from the ordi nary Text, chiefly in the spelling of certain words, and in the use of italics, will be noticed. For the principles adopted by Dr Scrivener as regards the printing of the Text see his Intro duction to the Paragraph Bible, published by the Cambridge University Press. Ephesus is the Metropolis of Asia, and was consecrated to Artemis ...Pythagoras is said to have come from Ephesus. ..The schools of Parmenides, Zeno, and Democritus, and many philosophers even of our time, are to be found there. This I say not for the sake of saying it, but to shew that Paul needed much earnest care in writing to the Ephesians. ..The Epistle overflows with lofty thoughts and doctrines. He writes it from prison at Rome... Things which he scarcely anywhere else utters, he here expounds. St Chrysostom, Preamble to his Homilies on the Epistle. INTRODUCTION. CHAPTER I. EPHESUS: ASIA: ST PAUL'S CONNEXION WITH EPHESUS. A brief notice of Ephesus itself will be sufficient here, for the Epistle, whatever was its destination (see pp. 24, &c), deals scarcely at all with local features and interests. Its pictures of surrounding forms of thought and life are common, if not to the world of the apostolic age in general, certainly to the then world of western Asia Minor1. Ephesus was colonized mainly from Athens, and the Ephesians inherited something of Athenian genius. The great painters, Parrhasius (cent. 5 B.C.) and Apelles (cent. 4 B.C.), were both Ephesians. But Asiatic elements, no doubt, largely entered into the race and thought of the people. For a great harbour and emporium the situation of the city was remarkable. It stood some miles from the open coast, on a landlocked basin, the Sacred Port. This was artificially embanked, and con nected with the sea by a broad channel which communicated with the river Cayster between the city and the shore. In primeval times the sea, not yet shut out by the alluvium of the Cayster, had washed the buildings of the city, but long before the apostolic age a process of silting, made worse by mistaken engineering, had begun to choke the channel, and ultimately cut off altogether the waterway to the sea. It was already difficult in St Paul's time to sail into the Sacred Port. 1 On the supposed allusion, ch. ii., to the Temple of Artemis (Diana), see the remark, p. 27. io INTRODUCTION. The two architectural features of Ephesus which come up in the Scripture narrative are the Temple of Artemis (Diana), and the Theatre. The Ephesian Artemis had little if any connexion with the Huntress of Hellenic mythology. Her statue, with its many breasts, betokened the fertility of Nature, and was engraved, in Greek letters, with a magic legend. The mighty Temple, one of the Seven Wonders of the ancient world, stood facing eastward, outside the city walls. First and last, it was the work of 220 years ; built of shining marble ; 342 feet long by 164 feet broad; supported by a forest of columns each 56 feet high; a sacred museum of master-pieces of sculpture and painting. At the centre, hidden by curtains within a gorgeous shrine (ndos), stood the very ancient image of the Goddess, of wood or ebony1, reputed to have fallen from the sky. Behind the shrine was a treasury where, as in " the safest bank in Asia," nations and kings stored their most precious things. The Temple, as St Paul saw it, subsisted till A. D. 262, when it was ruined by the Goths. The Theatre, excavated on the western side of Mount Cores- sus, and, like all ancient theatres, open to the sky, was the largest in the Hellenic world, capable of containing 50,000 spec tators. Not far to the north of it lay the Stadium, or Race course, where also the fights of beasts, and of men with beasts, were shewn. To this we can trace figurative references in the great Epistle written from Ephesus (1 Cor. iv. 9, ix. 24, 25, xv. 32). Ephesus was the capital of Proconsular Asia. The Roman province so called included the whole western coast of our Asia Minor and a considerable interior region. It was governed by a Proconsul, chosen by lot from only the Consulars, or Past- Consuls; a distinction confined to Asia and Libya. The Pro consul was assisted, or checked, by the Agent (Procurator) of the Emperor, and by other Roman officials. But the province was permitted in a subordinate degree to administer its own affairs, through municipalities, a Senate, and a popular As- 1 The material was uncertain. It may have been even an aerolite. INTRODUCTION. sembly, which Assembly met usually in the Ephesian Theatre. The President of the Senate and Assembly was the "Clerk," or "Recorder," of Acts xix. He held office for a year, and the year was dated by his name. Another important dignity was that of "Asiarch" (Acts xix. 31; "chief of Asia," A.V.; "chief officers of Asia," R.V.). The Asiarchs had for their main function, along with a priestly office, the duty of providing (in a large measure) and of controlling1 the great public games and shows, all of which bore a quasi-sacred character. The earliest N.T. allusion to the region of Ephesus may be found in Acts ii. 9, where we find some pious Jews from "Asia" among the crowd at Pentecost. Through these men, or some of them, the first intimations of the Gospel may have reached the plain of the Cayster. St Paul, in the early stages of his great second missionary circuit (a.d. 51) was divinely "forbidden to preach the word in Asia " (Acts xvi. 6). But at its close, on his way from Greece to Syria, he visited Ephesus (Acts xviii. 18 — 21), bringing Aquila and Priscilla with him, and leaving them there. His own stay was short, as he was hastening to keep a festival, probably Pentecost, at Jerusalem; and his evangelistic work consisted wholly in "reasonings" (perhaps in one isolated "reasoning," for the verb is aorist, ver. 19) with the Jews in their synagogue. The impression made by his message must have been favourable, for he was pressed to stay, and departed with a promise to return. During his absence, in Syria and Asia Minor (Acts xviii. 22, 23, xix. 1), Apollos visited Ephesus, received full Christian instruc tion from Aquila and Priscilla, and passed on to Corinth (Acts xviii. 24 — 28). St Paul's second visit lasted over three years (Acts xx. 31), probably from a.d. 54 to A.D. 57. He arrived from the interior of Asia Minor (Acts xix. 1, where "upper coasts" means "inland parts"). He found, no doubt, some results already of the labours 1 "The Asiarch Philip" appears in the narrative of St Polycarp's martyrdom (A.D. 166) at Smyrna (ch. xii.), as the authority to whom the populace appeal to let a lion loose upon the martyr. See the Excursus on the Asiarchate, Lightfoot's Ignatius, &c. vol. II. sect. ii. pp. 987 &c. INTRODUCTION. of Aquila and Priscilla, and of Apollos. But the only recorded details of his earliest work are the discovery, instruction, baptism, and miraculous endowment of a small group of embryo Christians, if we may call them so (xix. I — 7), and three months of discussion and appeal in the Jewish synagogue where he had been so well received before (xix. 8). Opposition now developed, and as a considerable number of "disciples" had attached them selves to the Gospel, he separated them for purposes of worship and teaching, making the "school of Tyrannus" his Christian synagogue. This may have been, as Alford suggests, a "private synagogue" belonging to a Jew Tyrannus, or the lecture-room of a Gentile convert Tyrannus, or a hall known as "Tyrannus' hall"1. Here for full two years (xix. 10) he discoursed daily, just as modern missionaries in India or China do in chapels or wayside rooms. And such was the power of the message, with its attendant physical miracles (xix. 12), and its victorious ex posure ofthe magical practices2 for which Ephesus was famous (xix. 13 — 20), and such was the facility and frequency of inter course between Ephesus and its province, that the Gospel was "heard " during these two years by " all them that dwelt in Asia, both Jews and Greeks" (xix. 10, and cp. 26). This doubtless means that there was no Asiatic town or district, generally speaking, which the Gospel did not penetrate, whether by means of deputed missionaries, such as Epaphras probably was, sent out by the Apostle from Ephesus, or by native visitors to Ephesus, returning to their homes as actual converts or, at least, "enquirers." Modern missionary work, an instructive but neglected commentary on the Acts, can supply ample illustrations of such an extension ofthe Gospel3. As regards St Paul's own work, it seems clear that he re mained stationary, on the whole, at Ephesus. To the Ephesian 1 The probable reading, Acts xix. 9, is not "one Tyrannus," but "Tyrannus." 2 See further, Appendix G. 3 See two small but suggestive books, The Story of the Puh-kien Mission ofthe Church Missionary Society, and The Story of the Cheh- keang Mission. INTRODUCTION. 13 presbyters (xx. 18) he speaks of having been with them "the whole time" (rather than "at all times," A.V.). And in Col. ii. 1 we find him implying, in the obvious sense of the words, that he had never personally visited the missions in the vale of the Lycus — Colossae and Hierapolis. We dwell on this double phenomenon, the Apostle's fixity of residence and wide extent of influence, as tending to explain the facts which constitute the problem of Eph. i. 1, and which are discussed more fully below, pp. 24, &c. It may help the reader to a clear conception of the geographical extent of this two years' work, to enumerate the places in Proconsular Asia named in the N. T. All the Seven Churches of the Revelation are of the number, and Troas, Assos, Adramyttium, Miletus, Trogyllium, Hierapolis, and Colossae. This period of extraordinary influence and success, along with constant Jewish opposition (Acts xx. 19), was closed some what sooner, perhaps, than the Apostle had planned, by the tumult raised by Demetrius (Acts xix.) ; itself a direct testimony to the extent and depth of the work ofthe Gospel in the city and province. The First Epistle to the Corinthians was written from Ephesus, at some time during this long stay of the Apostle. Its date lies close to the end of the stay. The writer (ch. xvi.) evidently contemplates a speedy visit to Macedonia on the way to Corinth. We have referred already to the Ephesian allusions to be found in that Epistle. On St Paul's last voyage to Syria (A.D. 58) he touched (Acts xx. 15) at Miletus, on the coast of Caria, some 30 miles south of Ephesus. Avoiding on purpose a visit to Ephesus, where in so large a Christian community causes for delay would inevitably have arisen1, he sent for the presbyters (called epi- scopi, ver. 28) of Ephesus to meet him at Miletus, and there addressed to them the pathetic and noble "charge" recorded by St Luke, Acts xx. 18—35. We Polnt out elsewhere (p. 32) some resemblances between the Charge and the Epistle. Here it is 1 See Prof. Lumby's notes on Acts xx. in this Series. 14 INTRODUCTION. enough to say that this remarkable passage in the Acts is specially interesting as indicating the early organization of the Christian ministry at Ephesus, a fact only remotely suggested in the Epistle ; and as supplying an interior view of the persistency, thoroughness, and profound affection and earnestness of the Apostle's personal work in the city. We hear no more of Ephesus till near the close of St Paul's life, the period of the " Pastoral Epistles." Probably in A.D. 631 we find him (1 Tim. i. 3) exhorting Timothy to "stay on at Ephesus," when Paul himself was on the way to Macedonia. And Timothy's work was to be, besides the superintendence of church order, the correction of a type of false doctrine, in the outline of which we can detect the same combination of Judaistic and theosophic elements which seems to have formed the "heresy of Colossas " when our Epistle and that to the Colossians were written2. Ephesus is twice named in 2 Timothy, the Apostle's last letter. He speaks (i. 18) of the Ephesian One siphorus as having "served him in many things" at Ephesus; possibly during the long stay of three years, possibly during the later visit indicated 1 Tim. i. 3 s. And finally (iv. 12) he says that he has "sent Tychicus to Ephesus." We cannot know why this was done. Perhaps the "beloved brother and faithful minister" of Eph. vi. 21 was dismissed by the Apostle from the dangerous duty of personal attendance on the way to Rome, in order to return to Ephesus, there to build up and encourage the now endangered Church. Ephesus is mentioned twice more in the N. T. ; Rev. i. 11, ii. 1. We cannot here discuss the question, who and what were the "Angels of the Churches." But on any theory the Epistle to the Ephesian Angel is addressed by implication to the Ephesian Church also, and it is deeply interesting to gather 1 This is not the place to examine the date of the Pastorals. To us it seems certain that they are the work of St Paul's latest years, and of a period following the imprisonment at Rome recorded Acts xxviii. 2 See further, p. 20. * Very possibly St Paul was seized at Ephesus and carried thence to his death at Rome. Onesiphorus may have done him loving service at that crisis. INTRODUCTION. 15 from the words of the glorified Lord1 what was the spiritual condition of that Church at the distance of about a generation2 from the date of St Paul's writing. The merits and the faults are alike those of a highly enlightened and mature community, deeply taught in Divine truth and jealous for its purity, but allowing the chill to which a traditional faith, however exalted in its creed and theory, is liable, to infect their love to Christ. It is instructive to remember how amply the Pauline Epistle had provided the Ephesians with the antidote (ch. iii. 14 — 21) to this decline of love, while labouring for their fullest apprehen sion of the great theory of truth. See further, on the Apocalyptic Epistle, p. 33. "Asia" appears among the regions of our Asia Minor, 1 Pet. i. 1. The passage suggests that St Peter, as well as St Paul, worked as an Apostle in the countries indicated. But his head quarters appear to have been in the extreme east, not west, of the great district (ch. v. 13). Not with St Peter but with St John do we find Ephesus itself connected in the latest apostolic history; as the reference to the Epistles of the Revelation has already reminded us. Whatever there may be of mere legend in the stories of St John's old age, we may be quite reasonably sure that Ephesus was the abode of his last years, the scene of his influence on Polycarp, Ignatius, and Papias, and the place of his burial. Here, probably, his Gospel and his Epistles were written, and, within sixty miles of the Ephesian coast, the Revelation. Ephesus long remained the seat of a Christian Church, and was the place of the great Christian Council (A.D. 431) which dealt with the heresy of Nestorius. Eighteen years later it was the scene of the "Robber Synod," an assembly occasioned by controversies indirectly connected with the same heresy, and specially infamous for the outrageous violence of the domi nant party. The Bishop of Ephesus, at the end of cent. 4, bore the 1 Surely we are bound by the explicit language of the Seven Epistles to read them as His direct words, in a sense altogether peculiar. " See Abp Trench, Epistles to the Seven Churches, p. 78. 16 INTRODUCTION. title of Exarch (or Grand Metropolitan) of Asia; but the Pa triarch of Constantinople ultimately annexed the primacy of Asia. Ephesus, after a long gradual decline, is now an almost total solitude. A small Turkish village, Ayasaluk (a corruption of Hagios Theologos, the Holy Divine, St John), stands upon a part of the site. For further particulars of Ephesus, or Asia, or both, see Smith's Dictionaries, of Classical Geography and of the Bible; Falkener's Ephesus; Lewin's Life and Epistles of St Paul, vol. I., ch. xiii., with the Addenda, pp. xxii, xxiii; and especially J. T. Wood's Discoveries at Ephesus. CHAPTER II. ST PAUL AT ROME : OCCASION AND DATE OF THE EPISTLE. St Paul arrived in Rome, from Melita, in the spring of a.d. 61, probably early in March. There he spent "two full years " (Acts xxviii. 30), at the close of which, as we have good reason to believe, he was released. In the long delay before his trial1 he was of course in custody; but this was comparatively lenient. He occupied lodgings of his own (Acts xxviii. 16, 23, 30), probably a storey or flat in one of the lofty houses common in Rome. It is im possible to determine for certain where in the City this lodging was, but it is likely that it was either in or near the great Camp of the Praetorians, or Imperial Guard, outside the Colline Gate, just N.E. of the City2. In this abode the Apostle was attached day and night by alight coupling- chain to a Praetorian sentinel, but was' as free, apparently, to invite and maintain general intercourse as if he had been merely confined by illness. 1 Due probably to procrastination in the prosecution and to the caprice ofthe Emperor. See Lewin, vol. II. p. 236, for a parallel case. 2 See Bp Lightfoot, Philippians, pp. 9 &c, 99 &c. INTRODUCTION. 17 The company actually found in his rooms at different times was very various. His first visitors (indeed they must have been the providers of his lodging) would be the Roman Christians, including all, or many, of the saints named in a passage (Rom. xvi.) written only a very few years before. Then came the representatives of the Jewish community (Acts xxviii. 17, 23), but apparently never to return, as such, after the long day of discussion to which they were first invited. Then from time to time would come Christian brethren, envoys from distant Churches, or personal friends ; Epaphroditus from Philippi, Aris tarchus from Thessalonica, Tychicus from Ephesus, Epaphras from Colossae, John Mark, Demas, Jesus Justus. Luke, the beloved physician, was present perhaps always, and Timotheus, the Apostle's spiritual son, very frequently. One other memor able name occurs, Onesimus, the fugitive Colossian slave, whose story, indicated in the Epistle to Philemon, is at once a strik ing evidence of the perfect liberty of access to the prisoner granted to anyone and everyone, and a beautiful illustration both of the character of St Paul and the transfiguring power and righteous principles of the Gospel. No doubt the visitors to this obscure but holy lodging were far more miscellaneous than even this list suggests. Through the successive Praetorian sentinels some knowledge of the character and message of the prisoner would be always passing out. The right interpretation of Phil. i. 131 is, beyond reasonable doubt, that the true account of Paul's imprisonment came to be " known in the Praetorian regiments, and generally among people around"; and Phil. iv. 22 indicates that a body of earnest and affectionate converts had arisen among the population of slaves and freedmen attached to the Palace of Nero. And the wording of that passage suggests that such Christians found a welcome meeting place in the rooms of the Apostle; doubtless for frequent worship, doubtless also for direct instruction, and for the blessed enjoyments of the family affection ofthe Gospel. Meanwhile (Phil. i. 15, 16) there was a section of the Roman Christian community, probably the 1 See Bp Lightfoot, Philippians, pp. 99 &c. ephesians 2 18 INTRODUCTION. disciples infected with the prejudices of the Pharisaic party (see Acts xv., &c), who, with very few exceptions (see Col. iv. 1 1 and notes), took sooner or later a position of trying antagonism to St Paul ; a trial over which he triumphed in the deep peace of Christ. It is an interesting possibility, not to say probability, that from time to time the lodging was visited by inquirers of intellectual fame or distinguished rank. Ancient Christian tradition1 actually makes the renowned Stoic writer, L. Annasus Seneca, tutor and counsellor of Nero, a convert of St Paul's; and one phase of the legend was the fabrication, within the first four centuries, of a correspondence between the two. It is quite certain that Seneca was never a Christian, though his language is full of startling superficial parallels to that of the N.T., and most full in his latest writings. But it is at least very likely that he heard, through his many channels of information, of St Paul's existence and presence, and that he was intellectually interested in his teaching ; and it is quite possible that he cared to visit him. It is not improbable, surely, that Seneca's brother Gallio (Acts xviii. 12) may have described St Paul, however passingly, in a letter; for Gallio's religious indifference may quite well have consisted with a strong personal impression made on him by St Paul's bearing. Festus himself was little interested in the Gospel, or at least took care to seem so, and yet was deeply impressed by the personnel of the Apostle. And, again, the Prefect of the Imperial Guard, A.D. 61, was Afranius Burrus, Seneca's intimate colleague as counsellor to Nero, and it is at least possible that he had received from Festus a more than commonplace description of the prisoner consigned to him2. Bp Lightfoot, in his Essay, "St Paul and Seneca" (Philip pians, pp. 270, &c), thinks it possible to trace in some of the Epistles of the Captivity a Christian adaptation of Stoic ideas. 1 The first hint appears in Tertullian, cent. 2—3. 2 We cannot but think that Bp Lightfoot (Philippians, p. 301) some what underrates the probability that Gallio and Burrus should have given Seneca an interest in St Paul. INTRODUCTION. 19 The Stoic, for example, made much of the individual's member ship in the great Body of the Universe, and citizenship in its great City. The connexion suggested is interesting, and it falls quite within the methods of Divine inspiration that materials of Scripture imagery should be collected from a secular region. But the language of St Paul about .the Mystical Body, in the Ephesian Epistle particularly, reads far more like a direct revelation than like an adaptation ; and it evidently deals with a truth which is already, in its substance, perfectly familiar to the readers1. Other conspicuous personages of Roman society at the time have been reckoned by tradition among the chamber-converts of St Paul, among them the poet Lucan and the Stoic philo sopher Epictetus2. But there is absolutely no evidence for these assertions. It is interesting and suggestive, on the other hand, to recall one almost certain case of conversion about this time within the highest Roman aristocracy. Pomponia Graecina, wife of Plautius the conqueror of Britain, was accused (a.d. 57, probably), of "foreign superstition," and tried by her husband as domestic judge. He acquitted her. But the deep and solemn seclusion of her life (a seclusion begun a.d. 44 when her friend the princess Julia was put to death, and continued unbroken till her own death, about A.D. 84), taken in con nexion with the charge, as in all likelihood it was, of Christianity, " suggests that, shunning society, she sought consolation in the duties and hopes ofthe Gospel"3, leaving for ever the splendour and temptations of the world of Rome. She was not a convert, obviously, of St Paul's; but her case suggests the possibility of other similar cases. At what time of the Two Years the Epistle to the Ephesians was written, we cannot hope to determine with precision. It is 1 It appears in the First Ep. to the Corinthians, written a few years before the Ep. to the Ephesians. See 1 Cor. xii. 2 For the curiously Christian tone of Epictetus' writings here and there, see Bp Lightfoot, Philippians, pp. 313 &c. The Manual of Epictetus is a book of gold in its own way, but still that way is not Christian. 8 Bp Lightfoot, Philippians, p. 21. INTRODUCTION. a prevalent theory that the Ephesian and Colossian Epistles date somewhat early in the period, and the Philippians late. Bp Lightfoot (Philippians, pp. 30, &c.) has given some strong reasons for the reversal of the order. The strongest, in our view, is the consideration of style in the respective Epistles. The Philippian Epistle, so far as it is dogmatic, approaches certainly much nearer to the type of the Roman than the Ephesian does ; and this suggests a comparative nearness in date. The test of style demands caution, certainly, in its application, in the case of a writer of such compass and versatility as St Paul ; circum stances might suggest similarity of subject to his mind at widely dissimilar times, and the subject rather than the time would rule the style, within certain limits. But in this case we have further to observe that the style of the Ephesian Group (so to call it) is manifestly, in some aspects, a new style, and charged with dogmatic materials in many respects new. And this suggests at least the probability of an interval between the Roman and Ephesian Epistles as long as the chronology will reasonably allow. We may conjecture that it was at some time in A.D. 62, perhaps even early in A.D. 63, that the Ephesian Epistle, with its companion Epistles, was written. Epaphras had arrived from Asia, and Tychicus was ready to travel thither, with Onesimus. The news from Asia had conveyed encouragement and anxiety at once. Life and love were abundant in the Churches. But a subtle danger was abroad, in the form of a pseudo-Christian teaching in which were blended ritual Judaism and a theosophy from the further East, dealing much with unhealthy theories of body and spirit, and with hierarchies of angelic powers set in the place due to Christ alone. With this error the Apostle deals explicitly in the Colossian Epistle, in which we can surely see, in some respects, the sketch or germ of the Ephesian1. In writing to the Ephesians he is not unconscious of this special need, which seems to give point to his repeated allusions to the spiritual hierarchies, good and evil and their relation to Christ. But he was guided to make of his 1 See further, p. 32. INTRODUCTION. Ephesian Letter far more than the treatment of a single phase of truth. As in the Romans, so here, he addresses himself to the mighty theme of the whole Gospel ; from the point of view not now of the justification nf the sajnts but-ef-4heir lifejn and ^umonwjthjhjh^£djeming Head, and the consequent oneness ofthe whole organism" ot the true Church in time and in eternity. Faithful to the genius of the Gospel, he applies these transcendent truths with great minuteness to the realities of common life, especially that of the Christian Home. Some scholars, notably Meyer, have placed the Ephesian and its companion Epistles in the two years' imprisonment at Casarea Stratonis (Acts xxiv. 23 — 27). But the reasons for this date (which may be seen carefully stated in Alford's1 Prolegomena to the Ephesians) are met by some obvious considerations which seem to us altogether conclusive. The Roman imprisonment, far more than the Caesarean, was a time likely a priori to be one of stimulated energy and administrative as well as doctrinal action on the Apostle's part. And the language used in the Philippians about the progress of the Gospel in the Imperial Guard and Household points almost in so many words to Rome. And if this be so, and if it is granted, as it is, that the Philippians and Ephesians axe not to be dated far apart, and above all if it is granted that the Philippians is the earlier Epistle, the Ephesians must be assigned of course to the Roman captivity. For this conclusion Bp Lightfoot decides without reserve. It may not be uninteresting to enumerate briefly some events of Roman secular history which fall within, or nearly within, the two years of St Paul's residence at Rome. A.D. 61. Boadicea revolts in Britain ; 70,000 Romans and allies perish, and, in the suppression of the revolt, 80,000 Britons. Pedanius Secundus, a senator of Rome, is murdered by one of his slaves. As the legal consequence 400 slaves, the number under the master's roof at the time, are put to death. Agrippa (the Agrippa of Acts xxv.) raises the structure of his 1 Alford controverts them with convincing force. See also Harless' Commentary on the Epistle, Einleitung, pp. lxii, &c. INTRODUCTION. palace at Jerusalem so as to command a view of the Temple courts. The Jews raise a counter-wall. Festus orders its demolition. The Jews send an embassy to Rome, which is successful by the favour of Nero's mistress Poppaea, a proselyte. Festus dies, and is succeeded in Judaea by Albinus. a.d. 62. Afranius Burrus, Praetorian Prefect, dies. This begins the decline of the influence of his colleague Seneca, who is compelled to retire into private life. Nero is more than ever his own master. Tigellinus, the Emperor's favourite, becomes the supreme influence at court. Octavia, Nero's wife, is divorced, and soon after put to death. Before her death Nero's concubine Poppaea is made his wife. The High Priest Ananus procures, at Jerusalem, the martyr dom of St James the Just (the James of Acts xv.). The Roman Governor Albinus, appealed to by the moderate Jewish party, reprimands the High Priest. It appears that the High Priest possessed no power of life and death without the Procurator's sanction. The Quinquennium of Nero, the first five years of his reign, during which, under good advice and guidance, the Empire had been singularly happy, had closed about three years before St Paul's Roman residence. CHAPTER III. authenticity of the epistle. There is no trace in early Christian literature of doubt about the authenticity of the Epistle. Not to enumerate more passing references, St Irenceus (cent. 2), quotes ch. v. 30 as the words of "the beatified Paul in his Epistle to the Ephesians," and ch. v. 13 as "the words of Paul" ; St Clement of Alexandria (cent. 3), quotes inter alia ch. iv. 21 — 25, as St Paul's; and Tertullian (cent. 2 — 3) names (de Prcescriptione, c. xxxvi.) Ephesus among the Churches which possess original apostolic (and, by context, Pauline) Epistles. INTRODUCTION. 23 To give further detail would be needless, as there is ab solutely no adverse ancient voice on the authorship and autho rity of the Epistle. We only add, for the great interest of the passage, the possible allusion to this Epistle by St Ignatius (early cent. 2) in his Ep. to the Ephesians, ch. xii. The passage, undoubtedly genuine, admits of translation either thus: — "Ye are initiated into mysteries with Paul,... who in every part of his letter makes mention of you in Christ Jesus" ; or thus : — ". . .who in every letter makes mention &c." The former rendering is advocated by Dean Alford, and by Prof. Westcott (Canon ofthe N.T., ed. 1866, p. 44 note), the latter by Bp Lightfoot in his recent edition of St Ignatius. In our view the rendering "in every Epistle" is preferable, for the reason that (being abun dantly safe grammatically) it is somewhat nearer to the facts. It is scarcely the case that St Paul "mentions" the Church he addresses, in any unusual -way, "in every part of" our Epistle ; while it is remarkable that he does " mention " Ephesian Christians in the Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, and 1 and 2 Timothy; often enough to account for the phrase " in every Epistle" in a rather hyperbolic passage. In quite modern times doubt has been cast on the author ship, by some great critics of the liberal school in Germany. De Wette took it to be an amplification of the Epistle to the Colossians1 by an imitator in the apostolic age; Baur, to be full of Gnostic thought and phraseology proving it to belong to a time when Gnosticism was developed, and to be the work of a writer of Gnostic tendencies. It is surely reply enough to both lines of attack to say, " Take up and read"1. Few indeed must be the readers who, whatever their view of the dogmatic autho rity of the Epistle, will not recognize in it the thought and diction of a mighty master. And who, with any knowledge of 1 An argument in this direction has been drawn from the words "If yt have heard" (iii. 2), which, it is alleged, could not have been naturally written by St Paul. But an able imitator would instinctively avoid just such a verbal difficulty. 2 "To all such difficulties there is the one sweeping reply, that no one but St Paul could have been the writer." Howson, Character of St Paul, p. 146, note. 24 INTRODUCTION. Gnostic theory and practice, will believe that an Epistle so full of humbling precepts for the conduct of daily life in common homes, to mention that feature only of the Epistle, could have come from a Gnostic quarter?1 The Epistle is both sublimely and practically Christian. It is the work of a writer whose intellect and affections were of the highest order. His words have proved an inexhaustible mine of spiritual truth and light for eighteen centuries in every branch of the Christian Church. But the extant writings of the Fathers of the first two centuries, to say the least, shew no trace of the existence among them of such a personage as would be thus required, on the theory that the Epistle is not St Paul's. It seems needless to say more, unless to re mark that a very deliberate fabrication is inconceivable, on any reasonable moral theory, in the case of a writer who was at once of a high type of mental character and emphatically earnest in the inculcation of absolute truthfulness. CHAPTER IV. IN what sense was the epistle addressed to the EPHESIANS ? This question arises immediately out of the critical problem of ch. i. i, where see the note. And the answer will be best given in the form of a discussion of that problem. 1 M. Renan, in the Introduction to his Saint Paul, discusses the character and authorship of the Epistle at some length. He wavers, apparently, between the alternatives that it is a fabrication based on the Colossians, and that it is a letter written, under St Paul's eye, by Tychicus, or more likely Timothy, as a circular for the Asiatic churches. He does not hesitate to call it " une Epitre banale", a very mediocre, almost a vulgar, Epistle, and to describe its style as " diffuse, nerveless, loaded with repetitions and useless words, entangled with foreign incidental matter, full of pleonasms and confusion." On the other hand he is prepared to regard it as forming, with the Colossians, " a pendant to the Romans, as a sort of theological exposition intended to be transmitted by way of circular to the different churches founded by the Apostle." (Saint Paul, Introduction, pp. xviii, &c.) INTRODUCTION. 25 What, then, is the evidence, favourable and adverse, about the presence in the original Epistle, ch. i. i, of the words "at Ephesus " ? A. Evidence for omission : a. External:— Two uncial Gr. MSS. (only two, but both of the greatest importance) BN (cent. 4), shew no trace of the words. One cursive MS. (67 of St Paul's Epp., cent. 12), as corrected by a later scribe, omits them. The reading of such copies has to be rendered, "To the saints that are, and to the faithful, &c," or, just possibly1, "To the saints that are also faithful, &c." Besides this MS. evidence there is much more considerable evidence for omission in the way of patristic quo tations and allusions. The earliest witness (an indirect one) is Tertullian (cent. 2 — 3), who states (adv. Marcion. V. 11, 17) that "the heretics," i.e. the Marcionite Gnostics, certainly Marcion himself, tampered with (interpolare) the title, reading To the Laodiceans before the Epistle which the Church knew as To the Ephesians. This certainly suggests the high probability that copies existed in cent. 2 which did not contain the dis puted words in ver. 1 ; and although Marcion was a ruthless and most uncritical emendator, or rather lacerator, of the Scripture text, it is not likely that he was guilty here, where the change would have served no dogmatic purpose. All that Tertullian asserts is that he changed the title. Would he have done this, or would Tertullian have said no more of it, if "at Ephesus" had notoriously stood in ver. 1 ? Again, Origen (cent. 3), in a fragment, quotes this verse as presenting the phrase, absolutely, "the saints that are" and conjectures that it indicates the truth that in Christ believers have attained real being, as partakers of the Life of the I am. St Basil the Great (cent. 4) alludes to the shorter reading as "handed down by those before us," and as " found by himself in the more ancient copies." And he remarks on the absolute phrase in the same sense as Origen's, and perhaps with allusion to his opinion. To the same interpretation St Jerome (cent. 5) alludes in his 1 This is suggested in the admirable statement of the case in Westcott and Hort's N. T. in Greek, II. 1 24. But surely the improbability is great. 26 INTRODUCTION. commentary on the verse, describing it as more recondite (curiosius) than was necessary. In the context, indeed, he says that some think the reading to be "to them that are at Ephesus." But St Jerome's received text must have run otherwise. These facts leave the impression, on the whole, that an un certainty, to say the least, attached very early and very widely indeed to the two words. Renan boldly says, " The words iv 'E<£eV3 condition of the period, an order of things. Here "this age" is the period of mortality, probation, preparation for "the age to come," the spiritual and eternal regime, the final development of "the Kingdom of God " (1 Cor. xv. 50). All superhuman authorities recognized now, all that may be set up and recognized then, alike are absolutely inferior to Christ. We have here a suggestion of the truth (to which i Cor. xv. 28 is no real contradiction) that "of His Kingdom there shall be no end." The eternal throne will be that "of God and of the Lamb" (Rev. xxii. 1, 3). 22. and hath put] Lit. and did put; at the great act of En thronement after Resurrection. Cp. 1 Cor. xv. 27 &c, where we have explicit reference to Ps. ex. 1, and in a way which suggests here the interpretation that the subjection of all things was then accomplished in the earnest, but is not to be accomplished in final act till the " destruc tion of death." — The phrase here carries the thought of Christ's Lord ship on from His relations to angels as their King to His attitude towards all opposition as its Conqueror. and gave him] "Him" is emphatic by position; He and no other is the Head. head] A word combining the idea of exaltation with that of the vital union necessary to an organism. The ascended Lord presides over His Church, but more — He is to it the constant Cause and mighty Source of spiritual vitality. "Because He lives, it lives also.'" Its organization grows from Him, and refers to Him. Cp. 1 Cor. xi. 3; Col. i. 18, ii. 10, 19; and below, iv. 15, v. 23. The idea, it will be seen, appears in this precise form (the Headship of the Body) only in Eph. and Col.; unless 1 Cor. xii. 21 is to be added. over all things] I.e., immeasurably beyond anything else that can seem to claim headship; any fancied Power of quasi -philosophic systems. the church] This great word appears here in its highest reference, the Company of human beings "called out" (as the word Ecclhia implies) from the fallen world into vital union with the glorified Christ. The word occurs nine times in this Epistle (here, iii. 10, 21 v. 23, 24, *5> a7> 29> 32) and always in the same high connexion. Cp. for parallels Col. i. 18, 24; Heb. xii. 23; and, in a measure, Acts xx. 28; 1 Cor. xv. 9. As it stands here, the word rises above the level of visibility and external organization, and has to do supremely with direct spiritual relations between the Lord and the believing Company. In is, in fact, (see ch. v.), "the Bride, the Lamb's Wife," ofthe Revelation, only not as yet manifested in bridal splendour. It is " the called, justified, and glorified," of Rom. viii. ; "the Church of the Firstborn," of Heb. xii.; "the royal priesthood, the people of possession," of 1 Peter. All other meanings of the word Church are derived and modified from this, but this must not be modified by them. "The Church of Christ, which we properly term His body mystical, can be but 64 EPHESIANS, II. [v. I. 2 his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all. And you one... a body mystical, because the mystery of their conjunction is removed altogether from sense. Whatsoever we read in Scripture concerning the endless love and saving mercy which God sheweth to His Church, the only proper subject thereof is this Church. Concerning this flock it is that our Lord and Saviour hath promised, ' I give unto them eternal life, and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.' They who are of this Society have such marks and notes of distinction from all others as are not objects unto our sense; only unto God who seeth their hearts... they are clear and manifest" (Hooker, Eccles. Polity, ill. i.) See further Appendix B. which is his body] A metaphor which suggests not only vital union with the Head, but that the will of the Head is exercised through the members. They are His instruments. — A kindred but not identical use ofthe metaphor appears Rom. xii. 5; " members one of another;" and 1 Cor. a. 17. For closer parallels cp. Col. i. 24, ii. 19; and below, ii. 16, iv. 4, 12, 16, v. 23, 30. the fulness of him, &c] This mysterious phrase has been much discussed. On the whole the inferences have taken one or other of two main lines. The word "fulness" (plerbma), has been (1) ex plained to mean the receptacle of fulness, or filled receptacle ; the vehicle, so to speak, in which the resources of the grace of Christ manifest their greatness, and which is filled by them. Among other pleas for this view is the fact that in some schools of the Gnosticism which so soon followed the apostolic age the Plerbma was the recog nized term for the home, or sphere, of the great Emanations (ALons) of the Absolute Being (Bythus), and in one theory, of the Absolute Being Itself also. The word has been (2) held to mean, in all doctrinal passages of the N. T., substantially, the ideal fulness, or totality, of Divine attributes or graces ; as certainly in Col. ii. 9. Bp Lightfoot (Colossians, pp. 323 — 339) discusses the word in an ex haustive essay. He shews that pler6ma cannot naturally mean (as it has been taken to mean in some passages) the thing which fills a void. It is the filled condition of a thing, whether the thing be a rent to be mended, an idea to be realized, or a prophetic plan to be "ful filled." He shews further that the word had acquired a technical theo logical meaning in St Paul's time, probably in the Palestinian schools of Jewish thought ; a meaning connected especially with the eternally realized Ideal of Godhead ; the Divine Fulness. This Fulness resides (by the Father's will, yet necessarily,) in the Eternal Son (Col. i. 19); and the Son, Incarnate, Sacrificed, and Risen, is so conjoined in spiritual Union to His regenerate Church that what is true of Him is true, within sacred limits, of her. As He without measure is the Fulfilment, or Ideal, of Divine Attributes, so she in measure is the Fulfilment, or Ideal, of Divine Graces ; which are, we may venture to say, the Attri butes in their reception and manifestation by the regenerate Church. She is the Body through which is realized the Will of the Head, the v. I.] EPHESIANS, II. 65 hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins; Fulfilment in which is realized the Grace of the Head. — It will be observed that the two interpretations of the word indicated in this note have an underlying connexion. See this curiously illustrated by Bp. Lightfoot (Colossians, pp. 331, &c), from the history of Gnostic theories. that filleth all in all] The reference is to the Son, Who is in view through the immediate context. His vital connexion with His true Church is such that it not only is the Receptacle of His Divine grace, but is actually pervaded everywhere by His spiritual omnipresence. The form (middle) of the verb suggests intensity and richness of action ; a power which is indeed living and life-giving. " All in all:" — in other words, He is the Cause of all the holiness that is in all His members ; whatever in them is filled with grace, He fills it. — It seems needless to seek a remoter meaning, as, "filleth all things (the universe) with all things " (Alford). The true Church, in its glorious Ideal, which is meanwhile its proper Reality, only not yet fully manifested, is thus presented in spiritual and eternal union with its exalted Head. The Apostle is now about to descend to the special instance of the bringing into it of its Ephesian members. Cp. Col. i. 21, &c. CHAPTER II. 1 — 10. Regeneration of the Ephesians, an instance of Gratuitous Salvation. 1. And you hath he quickened] The construction is broken, and the gap is filled by the inserted verb, inferred from ver. 5 below, where however "we" has taken the place of "you." Better, perhaps, did He quicken (as R. V.) ; the Gr. verb in ver. 5 being the aorist. Ideally, in their slain and risen Lord's triumph, actually, in their spiritual regeneration, "believing on His name," they had definitely received "eternal life." — The English reader will remember that in the A. V. " to quicken " means seldom if ever to excite what already lives, but to bring from death to life. Observe here the great theme of the Church and its Head treated in the special aspect of entrance into the Body by Divine regeneration of persons. For close parallels, though they treat the matter more from the side of Christ's atoning work, cp. Col. i. 21, ii. 13; passages which, if written shortly before this, may have suggested the form of the opening phrase of this. who were dead] Lit. being dead, "when you were dead;" devoid of spiritual and eternal life ; see the next words. Obviously this weighty phrase needs to be read in the light of other truths; such as the existence of spirit, and the full presence of conscience, and of account ability, in the unregenerate. But those truths must not be allowed unduly to tone down this statement, which distinctly teaches that the ephesians e 66 EPHESIANS, II. [v. 2. 2 wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of state of the unregenerate has a true analogy to physical death; and that that analogy on the whole consists in this, that (i) it is a state in which a living principle, necessary for organization, growth and energy, in refer ence to God and holiness, is entirely lacking; (2) it is a state which has no innate tendency to develope such a principle of life. The principle must come to it altogether ab extra. — The latest researches into nature confirm the conviction that dead matter has absolutely no inner ten dency to generate life, which must come into it ab extra if it is to live ; a suggestive analogy. On the doctrine of spiritual death as the state of unregenerate man, cp. ch. v. 14; Joh. v. 24; 1 Joh. iii. 14, v. 12; and see Joh. iii. 3, vi. 53. There are passages where " death " is used as a strong term to denote a comparatively lifeless state of the regenerate soul, needing (if it is to be escaped) not new birth, which is a thing once accomplished, but revival. But this modified sense of "death" must not be allowed to lower the absolute sense in a passage like this, with its peculiar doctrinal emphasis on the contrast of death and life. The state here described is not one of suppressed life, but of absence of life. Cp. 1 Tim. v. 6; Rev. iii. 1. 2 Cor. v. 14, sometimes quoted of spiritual death, is not in point : translate, "then did all die," and interpret of the death, representatively in Christ, of "all" at Calvary. in trespasses and sins] Better, In respect of your trespasses, &c. • — The Gr. construction is the dative without the preposition "in," (so Col. ii. 13); and indicates conditioning circumstances. — What is the distinction between "trespass" and "sin"? It has been held that "trespass" is more of the conception, and "sin" of the act; or again that "trespass" is more of omission, "sin" of commission. But usage forbids any certainty in such inferences. In Ezek. xviii. 26 the LXX. use the word paraptSma (trespass) of the sin which the " righteous " commits and in which he dies. Etymologically, it is a fall over; and this may be either over a pebble or over a precipice. In actual usage, however, there is a slight occasional tendency in "trespass" towards a mitigated idea of sin, a "fault," as in Gal. vi. 1 ; and it is possible that we have this here ; as if to say, "in every form of evil-doing, whether lighter (trespasses) or heavier (sins)." But it is more probable still that the phrase is used designedly for accumulation's sake alone, without precise distinction ; as if to say, "evil-doing, however described. " See Abp. Trench, N. T. Synonyms, under the word aixaprla, &c. And above, note on i. 7. 2. Wherein... ye walked] The transgressions were the road, or region, of the moral "walk," i.e. the successive acts and practices of life. Contrast below, ver. ro, the region of the regenerate "walk." The Gr. verb is aorist. The whole past experience, however long, is gathered up in memory into a point. the course] Lit. the age. But the A. V. perfectly represents the meaning. See above on i. 21. v. 2.] EPHESIANS, II. 67 this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, this world] This present sinful order of things, as characterized by discord with the will of God. Cp. for the precise phrase Joh. viii. 23, ix. 39, xii. 25, 31, xiii. 1, xvi. n, xviii. 36; 1 Cor. i. 20, iii. 19, vii. 31; 1 Joh. iv. 17; (and see Gal. i. 4, where however "world" is aitn). In almost all the above passages the word (cosmos) will be seen clearly to mean not the physical world, (or certainly not it alone,) but the sinful human race, as now conditioned on earth. Full illustration will be found in very many passages where "the worldj" (not as here, "this world"), occurs, and which context will distinguish from others (e.g. i. 4 above) where the Cosmos of Creation is intended. The Gr. word rendered ' ' world " in some passages of A.V. (Matt. xxiv. 14; Luke ii. 1, iv. 5; Acts xvii. 31; Rom. x. 18; Heb. i. 6, ii. 5; Rev. iii. 10, xii. 9, xvi. 14; are the most important) is different, meaning literally "the inhabited earth," and so either the Roman empire and its surroundings, or the mystic empire of the Messiah, according to context. the prince, &c] Lit., the Ruler of the authority of the air; the great Personal Evil Spirit, Satan ; whose existence, sparingly indicated in the O. T., is largely dwelt upon in the N. T. To the Lord and the Apostles he was assuredly no mere personification of evil, but an evil personality, as truly as for example " Gabriel, who stands in the presence of God," is a good personality. As such, his existence is a fact- mystery, so to speak, not greater in kind, though in degree, than that of the permitted existence of an evil man who tempts and influences others. There is a strong prejudice in our time against the recognition of the personality of Satan; but it must stand on the level of other mysteries of Revelation; and the prejudice should never be fostered by exaggeration. Some food for prejudice has perhaps been found in the grotesque terrors of medieval art and legendary demonology; but this is not Scripture, rather the deepest contrast to Scripture. — The belief of a Devil has been called { Westminster Review, April, 1865, in an article on the Positive Philosophy), "a thoroughly polytheistic con ception ;" but what excuse is there for this statement in the Scripture portrait of the Enemy, save the solitary and quite explicable phrase, " God of this age" (2 Cor. iv. 4)? For St Paul's recognition of the great fact, cp. Acts xiii. ro, xxvi. 18 ; Rom. xvi. 20; 1 Cor. v. 5, vii. 5; 2 Cor. ii. 11, xi. 14; 1 Thess. ii. 18; 2 Thess. ii. .9; 1 Tim. i. 20, iii. 6, 7, v. 15; 2 Tim. ii. 26; and below, iv. 27, vi. 11. "The authority of the air:" — "The ruler of the authority" means the chief of all that is in power, the general of subordinate governors ; an allusion to the organization of the evil spiritual world, of which much more is said below, vi. 12. — The word rendered "authority" does not necessarily mean lawful authority ; indeed it often inclines to mean usurped or arbitrary authority. But it is authority as distinguished trom mere dynamic force. See Bp. Lightfoot on Col. i. 13. " Ofthe air:" — on this phrase much has been written. It here stands 5— 2 68 EPHESIANS, II. [v. 2. the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience : alone (as connected with spiritual mysteries) in the N. T., and hence is the more difficult to analyse with certainty. In studying it we must dismiss the thought ( Wetstein) that St Paul is speaking ' ' the language of Pythagorean philosophy, in which his readers were versed," or the like; no where is his tone more dogmatic. And we must seek a meaning of "air" literal and local, rather than otherwise, looking at his usage elsewhere (i Cor. ix. 26, xiv. 9; 1 Thess. iv. 17). This however does not mean a narrow localization, or hard literality, only that "air" is no? a mere figure of speech for "mystery," "darkness," or the like. On the whole we gather, as the revelation of this passage, that as earth is the present abode of embodied spirits, mankind, so the airy envelope of earth is the haunt, for purposes of action on man, of the spirits of evil, which, if not bodiless, have not "animal" bodies (cp. 1 Cor. xv. 44). Observe our Lord's use of "the birds of the sky" (Luke viii. 5) as the figure for the Tempter in the parable of the Sower. Abundant illustrations of such a view may be found in quotations from classical, Jewish, and medieval literature. But it would be a hasty inference either that the Apostle derived his doctrine from previous ex traneous sources, or that below the wildest exaggerations there lay no fact. the spirit] This word is in grammatical apposition, in the Greek, with that rendered "power" or "authority" just before. That " authority " meant, as we have said, " those in authority," the unseen lords of evil, including their head. " The spirit " seems accordingly to mean, practically, "the spirits," summed up into one idea, and used by one central power. that now worketh] " Now," as opposed to the " then " of its former action on those now rescued from it. — For illustrations of its " working " cp. the language used of Satan's power on Judas (Luke xxii. 3 ; Joh. xiii. 2, 27), and Ananias (Acts v. 3), and of his energies (through men) at a time of persecution (Rev. ii. 10). See also 2 Thess. ii. 9. The subtle power of human personal influence may well prepare us to believe in the mysterious depth, force, and variety, of Satanic influences. in the children of disobedience] I.e., in men characterized by moral resistance to the Holy God; a "disobedience" which, whether explicit or implicit, patent or latent, marks fallen man as such. There is that in the central Ego of fallen man which is antagonistic to the true claims of the God of Revelation, and which waits only the presentation of those claims to come out in action. — For the phrase, sons of disobedience, cp. ch. v. 6, and Col. iii. 6. It is an example of the frequent Hebrew phrase, "son of," "child of," in the sense of close connexion, whether a connexion, as here, of principle and motive, or, as Luke xx. 36 ("sons ofthe resurrection"), and 2 Pet. ii. 14 ("children of a curse"), of result and reward. — "Disobedience:" — the Latin versions have diffidentia, unbelief; and so the A.V. renders the same word, Rom. xi. 30, 32 ; Heb. iv. 6, 11. But the proper meaning of the word is resistance ofthe will. This is deeply connected with spiritual unbelief, but not identical. — The same remarks apply to the kindred verb, which occurs Joh. iii. 36; Acts xiv. 2, vv" = vi». n- Rnm. vi. 5n ?t v^ ot- Heb. iii. 18, xi. 315 places wh v. 3-] EPHESIANS, II. 69 among whom also we all had our conversation in times past 3 in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and 3. also we all] Better we also all, the "also" emphasizing the "we." — " We all:" — all present Christians, whether Jews or heathens by origin. St Paul often insists on this one level of fallen nature, wholly unaffected by external privilege. Cp. Rom. iii. 9, 23; Gal. iii. 22. It is met by the glorious antithesis of equal grace. Cp. just below, and Rom. i. 16, iii. 29, 39, x. 12, &c. — Observe the emphatic statement that man as (fallen) man, whether within or without the pale of revelation, begins as a "child of disobedience."— Observe too the change of person, from the second (ver. 2) to the first. The Apostle willingly, and truly, identifies his own experience with that of his converts. had our conversation] Lit., moved up and down; engaged in the activities of life. Conversatio in Latin, like the Gr. word here, means precisely this; the goings in and out of human intercourse; not specially the exchange of speech, to which the word "conversation" is now re stricted. — In Phil. iii. 20 the Gr. original is different. the lusts of our fiesh] Better, the desires. "Lusts" is narrowed in modern usage to a special class of sensual appetites, but the older English knew no such fixed restriction; see e.g. Psal. xxxiv. 12, in the Prayer Book (Cranmer's) Version; "what man is he that lusteth to live?" and Gal. v. 17, where the Spirit, as well as the flesh, "lusteth." — Sinful "lusts" are thus all desires, whether gross or fine in themselves, which are against the will of God. " Our fiesh:" — this important word, wherever it occurs in N.T. in connexion with the doctrine of sin, means human nature as conditioned by the Fall, or, to word it otherwise, either the state of the unregenerate being, in which state the sinful principle dominates, or the state of that element of the regenerate being in which the principle, dislodged, as it were, from the centre, still lingers and is felt; not dominant in the being, but present. (For its permanence, till death, in the regenerate, see the implied statements of e.g. Gal. v. 16; Phil. iii. 3.) We may account for the use of the word fiesh as a symbol for this pheno menon by the fact that sin works so largely under conditions of bodily, fleshly, life in the literal sense of those words. See further, note on Rom. viii. 4 in this Series. fulfilling the desires] Lit., doing the wishes. This (see last note) does not mean that "we" were loose livers, in the common sense; we might or might not have been such. But we followed the bent of the unregenerate Ego, whatever on the whole it was. of the mind] Lit., of the thoughts ; in the sense generally of re flection and impression. The word is used (in the singular) e.g. Matt. xxii. 37; "with all thy mind," representing the Heb. "heart" in Deut. vi. 5; and 1 Joh. v. 20; "He hath given us an understanding." Here probably the distinction is between sin in imagination and sin in positive action ("of the flesh ") ; one of the many warnings of Scripture that moral evil lies as deep as possible in the texture and uiofion of 70 EPHESIANS, II. [v. 3. of the mind ; and were by nature the children of wrath, the fallen nature. Cp. Matt. xv. 19; 2 Cor. vii. 1, and see Prov. xxiv. 9. by nature the children of wrath] On the phrase "children of wrath " see last note on ver. 2. "By nature we were connected with, we essentially were exposed to, wrath, the wrath of God." It has been suggested that "children of wrath" may mean no more than "beings prone to violent anger," or even to "ungoverned impulse" generally. But the word "wrath" is frequent with St Paul, and in 13 out of the 20 places it unmistakably means the Divine wrath, even where "of God" is not added, and where the definite article is absent. See for passages specially in point Rom. iv. 15, v. 9, ix. 22 ; below, ch. v. 6; 1 Thess. v. 9. Add to this that this passage deals with the deepest and most general facts, and it is thus unlikely that any one special phase of sin would be instanced. — N. T. usage gives no support to the suggested explanation "ungoverned impulse" mentioned above. The word must mean "wrath," whether of man or of God. — Translate, certainly, with A.V. and R.V. — On the truth that the fallen being, as such, lies under Divine "wrath," see Joh. iii. 36, where "the wrath of God remaineth against" the soul which does not submit to the Son. Not to "possess eternal life" is to have that "wrath" for certain still impending. And what is the Divine wrath? No arbitrary or untempered passion in the Eternal, but the antagonism of the eternal Holiness to sin ; only — the antagonism of an Eternal Person. Von Gerlach, quoted by Monod on this verse, writes: "The forgetfulness at the present day of the doctrine of the wrath of God has exercised a baneful influence on the various relations in which man holds the place of God, and in particular on the government of the family and the state." The antithesis to the truth about it is the dictum of the "Absolute Religion," that "there is nothing in God to fear;" words in complete discord with great lines of revelation. "By nature:" —i.e., by our unregenerate state in itself, not only by circumstances. For illustration see Gal. ii. 15, ("Jews by nature") and iv. 8, ("by nature no Gods"). Such was our state antecedent to the new process, ab extra, of regeneration. We have here the doctrine of "Original or Birth Sin," as given in Art IX. of the Church of England. "That which provokes the wrath of God is not only in the individual, but in the race and in the nature" (Monod). A greater mystery we could not state ; but neither could we name a surer fact. "Original sin is, fundamentally, simply universal sin. That is the fact which is at once the evidence and the substance of it. ..Universal sin must receive the same interpretation that any other universal does, namely that it implies a law, in consequence of which it is universal. Nobody supposes that anything takes place universally by chance... we know there must be some law working in the case. ..What we call the law is a secondary question. The great thing is to see that there is a law. If all the individuals who come under the head of a certain nature have sin in them, then one mode of expressing this law is to say that it 4, S-] EPHESIANS, II. 71 even as others. But God, who is rich in mercy, for his 4 great love wherewith he loved us, even when we were dead s in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace belongs to the nature, the nature being the common property and ground in which all meet" (J. B. Mozley, Lectures, ix. pp. 136, &c). See further, Appendix B. even as others] Lit., as also the rest; the unregenerate world at large. 4. But God] The Divine counter-fact now comes in, brighter for the awful contrast. who is rich in mercy] See note on "riches," i. 18. — The ultimate motive of the work of regeneration is here given, and it is simply the Divine Mercy. No claim or obligation is in the question, nor right inherent in the alienated race, nor "fitness of things" in the abstract; only the uncaused and supremely free choice of the God of mercy. Cp. Tit. iii. 5 ; 1 Pet. i. 3. for his great love, &c] On account of, &c. ; another aspect of the same fact. loved us] the New Israel, the Church. Not the Philanthropy of God, His "love toward man" (Tit. iii. 4), but His inner and special love, is here in view; affection rather than benevolence. The whole context shews this. — Observe the change from "you" (ver. 1) to "us." — For similar words regarding the Old Israel see Deut. vii. 8; "Because the Lord loved you, &c." 5. dead in sins] Better, In respect of our trespasses. See on ver. 1, where the construction is the same. hath quickened] Did quicken, i.e., bring from death to life; ideally, when our Lord and Head rose to life; actually, when we, by faith, were united to Him. together with Christ] As vitally and by covenant one with Him. For all His true "membeis," His Death of propitiation is as if theirs; His Life of acceptance before the Father, and of spiritual triumph and power, is as if theirs also. As it is to Him the Divine pledge of the finished work of satisfaction, that pledge is theirs; as He appears in it "in the power of indissoluble life" (Heb. vii. 16), they, "because He lives, live also" (Joh. xiv. 19). For the phrase cp. Col. ii. 13, which fixes the main reference to Acceptance. See accordingly Rom. iv. 25 ; "He was raised again by reason of our justification." — Another read ing, but not well supported, gives, "He quickened us together in Christ." (by grace ye are saved)] Lit. ye have been saved; and so ver. 8. The verb is perfect. More usually the present tense appears, "ye are being saved;" e.g. 1 Cor. xv. 2; 2 Cor. ii. 15 ("them that are being saved; them that are perishing"); the Christian being viewed as under ihe process of preservation which is to terminate in glory. See 1 Pet. i. 5. And again a frequent meaning of the noun " salvation " is that glory itself, as in the text just quoted and Rom. xiii. 11. Here, where the whole context favours such a reference, the reference is to the complete- 72 EPHESIANS, II [w. 6— 8. 6 ye are saved ;) and hath raised us up together, and made 7 us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus : that in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding riches of his 8 grace in his kindness towards us through Christ Jesus. For by grace are ye saved through faith ; and that not of your- ness, in the Divine purpose and covenant, of the rescue of the members of the true Church. From the Divine point of view that is a fait ac compli which from the human point of view is a thing in process, or in expectation. — " By grace : " — for commentary, see the Ep. to the Romans, esp. cch. iii. iv. and xi. 5, 6. The emphatic statement here is due to the whole context, (so full of the thought of a salvation which the saved could not possibly have generated, dead as they were, ) and, immediately, to the phrase "quickened with Christ," which involves the thought ofthe entire dependence of their "life" on Him. 6. and hath raised us up together, &c] Better, did raise, &c. — The radical idea of new life is here put into more detail, as a resurrection and ascension; the special form of the Lord's Revival. — "Together:" — the Gr. grammar allows this to refer to either (1) union with the Church, or (2) union with the Lord; (1) "as a united company," or (2) "as united to Him." And the words just below "in Him," not "with Him, " may seem to favour the former. But the previous verse, and Col. ii. 12, iii. 1; are strongly for the reference to Christ. His resur rection and ascension are the basis of the spiritual (as well as future bodily) resurrection and ascension of His Church. made us sit together, &c] Our great Representative is there, "sitting at the right hand of God" (Col. iii. 1). We, as "in Him," vitally united to Him, are there also, in the sense of a supreme acceptance and welcome by the Eternal Father, and of the sure prospect of heavenly "glorification together [with Christ]" (Rom. viii. 17). in heavenly places] See on i. 3. 7. the ages to come] All future periods of development in His King dom. The phrase must not be restricted to the future history of the Church on earth ; it is akin rather to the frequent formula for the eternal future, "unto the ages of the ages," and cp. esp. Jude 25, "both now and unto all the ages"- "The King of the Ages" (1 Tim. i. 17) alone knows what great "dispensations" are included in the one Eternity. shew] to other orders of being, angelic or other. Cp. iii. 10, and note. exceeding riches] A phrase intensely Pauline. See on i. 7. through Christ Jesus] Lit., and better, In. Vital union with the Lord is the never silent key-note of the passage. 8. For by grace, &c] The connexion of thought ("for") is with the leading truth of vv. 4 — 7; ihe gratuitous "loving-kindness of the Lord" in the salvation of the Church. This, we have just read, will be the great future lesson of that salvation to the intelligent Universe ; and this accordingly is re-stated here. This important ver., and ver. 9, are rendered lit., For by grace ye v. 9-] EPHESIANS, II. 73 selves : it is the gift of God : not of works, lest any man 9 have been saved, by means of faith ; and that, not of you— God's Is the gift; not of works, that no one should boast. Here the main teaching is clear in itself, and clearer than ever as illustrated by e.g. Rom. iii. ; Phil. iii. The salvation of the soul, and of the Church, is essentially and entirely a matter of sovereign Divine mercy in purpose and accomplishment. It is deliberately meant that no exception or reserve is to be made to that statement. But in detail, the verse pre sents a problem. Does it distinctly state that "faith" is the "gift of God," or does it state, more generally, that "gratuitous salvation" is the "gift of God," leaving it open whether the faith which accepts it is His gift or not? The question is largely occasioned by the construction of the Greek, in which "that" (neuter) does not agree with "faith " (feminine). — Many great expositors, Calvin at the head of them, accordingly take " that " to refer to the main previous idea, and " through faith " to be a separate inserted thought. Alford, who takes this view, states the case for it briefly and well. Nevertheless we recommend the other explanation, and for the following simple reason : the phrase "and that" (lit., " and this") is familiar in N.T. Greek to introduce an addition of thought, enforcing or heightening what has gone before. See 1 Cor. vi. 6, 8; "and that before the unbelievers;" "and that, your brethren ; " Phil. i. 28; Heb. xi. 12, (A.V., "and him, &c"). But if it here refers only to the general previous idea, gratuitous salvation, it is hard to see what new force of thought it adds to the words " by grace." If on the other hand it refers to the last special statement, " through faith," there is a real additional point in the assertion that even the act of believing is a gift of God ; for thus precisely the one link in the process where the man might have thought he acted alone, and where therefore, in St Paul's sense, he might claim to "boast," is claimed for God. Let the clauses, "and that, not of you; God's is the gift," be taken as a parenthesis, and the point of the inter pretation will be clear ; while the Greek amply admits the arrange ment. That "faith" is a matter of Divine gift is clear from e.g. 2 Cor. iv. 13 ; Phil. i. 29. Not that a new faculty of trust is implanted, but gra cious manifestations — of the soul's need and the Saviour's glory — prevail upon the will to choose to repose trust in the right Object. The "gift" of faith is but one phase of the Divine action which (Phil. ii. 13) "worketh in us to will." And it may be said to be one aspect of the "gift of repentance" (Acts v. 31 ; 2 Tim. ii. 25), for repentance is no mere preliminary to faith; it is the whole complex "change of mind" which includes faith. See Bp O'Brien's Nature and Effects of Faith, Note I. 9. lest any man should boast] Lit. , any one ; there is no emphasis on "man." — For the thought, cp. Rom. iii. 27, (and see iv. 2); 1 Cor. i. 29, iv. 7; Gal. vi. 14; Phil. iii. 3; in all which passages the Gr. word is the same. The Apostle is everywhere jealous for the sovereign claim of God to the whole praise of our salvation. 74 EPHESIANS, II. [vv. 10, n. re should boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before or dained that we should walk in them. n Wherefore remember, that ye beingin time passed Gentiles 10. For, &c] The connexion is, "works are not the antecedent, but the consequent, of your acceptance in Christ ;for the true statement of the case is, that you were re-made, re-born, in order to work the will of God." his] Strongly emphatic. "It is He that made us, and not we our selves" (Ps. c. 3). workmanship] Better, making. The Gr. word (poibna) is not akin to that rendered "works" (erga) in the passage, so that there is no intended antithesis. — "Making:" — i.e., He has made us what we are, members of His Son. The noun does not necessarily give the precise idea of a new " creation ; " it may mean only an appointment to position. But the two, as a fact, coincide in this matter — In Rom. i. 20 (its only other place in N.T.) the word is used of God's handiworks in nature. created] A frequent word, in spiritual connexions, with St Paul. Cp. ver. 15, iv. 24; 2 Cor. v. 17; Gal. vi. 15; Col. iii. jo. As in the sphere of nature, so in that of grace, it means essentially the making of a new state of things, whether in a Universe or a personality; implying indeed the omnipotence which originally willed the very material into existence, but not necessarily dwelling on this ; rather giving the thought of first, or new, arrangement. — In practice, the thought ofthe sovereignty ofthe Worker's will lies in the use of the word. in Christ Jesus] The third occurrence of these words within five verses. — The Church was " created in " Him, in that its very existence as such depends on vital union with Him. unto good works] Lit., "upon good works,'' i.e., as interpreted by usage, "with » view to them." The same construction and meaning appear Gal. v. 13; 1 Thess. iv. 7 (A.V., "unto uncleanness); 2 Tim. ii. 14 (A.V., "to the subverting"). hath before ordained] Lit., and better, did prepare beforehand ; on the ideal occasion of His planning the salvation and the function of His true Church. The phrase does not state, but surely implies, the happy truth that the Divine pre-arrangement so maps out, as it were, the duties and the sufferings of the saint that his truest wisdom and deepest peace is to "do the next thing" in the daily path, in the per suasion that it is part of a consistent plan for him. There are some admirable remarks in this direction in Monod's Adieux a ses amis et a VEglise, no. 14; "Le secret cfune vie sainte, active et paisible1" - 11 — 22. Regeneration of the Ephesians, an instance of the equal welcome of Gentiles to the Covenant Church, the true Temple. 11. Wherefore remember] Here first the Apostle deals with the special fact of the previous Gentilism of his converts. Hitherto he has 1 The book has been translated, as A. Monod's Farewell. v. 12.] EPHESIANS, II. 75 in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands ; that ia spoken of their regeneration, and incorporation into Christ, with regard to the state of fallen humanity in general ; "when we were dead. ..He quickened us," &c. The further element in the phenomenon now appears, that the recipients of the Epistle had been "outsiders" as regarded any explicit covenant of redemption. In itself, spiritual rege neration was equally gracious and sovereign for Jew and for Gentile. But as to any previous intimations, it must needs come with a greater surprise to the Gentile. It is perhaps impossible in the nineteenth century of Christendom to realize fully what was the marvel in the first century ofthe full revela tion of an equal welcome for all nations to the Messiah's covenant. But the fact that it was then a marvel remains a matter of permanent Divine instruction. Cp. in general on the subject Acts x. ; Rom. ii., iii., ix. — xi. ; Gal. ii. — iv. in time passed] Lit., once. Gentiles] Lit., the Nations; Heb., haggbyim; the races outside Israel. Rabbinic Judaism regarded them with feelings akin to those with which an old-fashioned high-caste Hindoo regards a European. Some precepts ofthe Talmud (though much later, in their collected form, than St Paul's day,) are fair illustrations : "It is forbidden to give good advice to a Gentile;" "it is forbidden to cure idolaters, even for pay; except on account of fear;" "he that steals from a Gentile is only to pay the principal ; for it is said, He shall pay double unto his neigh bour" (McCaul's Old Paths, p. 17, &c). Meanwhile, these gross distortions had behind them the spiritual fact here given by St Paul, that "the Gentiles," before the Gospel, were on a really different level from Israel as to covenant with God in Christ. Pharisaism took a totally wrong line, but started from a point of truth. in the flesh] Does this mean, " physically ," or (Rom. viii. 8; and often) "z'« the unregenerate state": Surely the former, for the same phrase immediately below clearly refers to a'physical thing, literal circumcision. Here probably the special reference is to the absence of the bodily mark of covenant. They were uncircumcised Gentiles, at a time when no way was yet revealed, other than that of circumcision, by which to enter into explicit covenant with God. called Uncircumcision] Or, regarding English usage of the article, the Uncircumcision ; this was their sobriquet with the Pharisee ; often used, no doubt, by the Pharisee Saul. The lack of the bodily mark was the condemning, and characteristic, thing, supplying a short expression for a state of entire difference and alienation . called the Circumcision] The race of the circumcised, the Jews. The point of this clause is best given by paraphrase: "So you were called by the bearers of the mark of the Abrahamic covenant, a mark divinely ordained, but spiritually valueless where there is no spiritual contact with God, and therefore, when vaunted as a title ('called the Circumcision') by the unspiritual Pharisee, no better than a mere 76 EPHESIANS, II. [v. 12. at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants bodily operation, ('circumcision in the flesh, wrought by hand')." The best illustration is the close of Rom. ii., where the theme is the uselessness, for spiritual purposes, of the sacramental mark in unspiritual persons. This short clause is, as it were, a condensed state ment of the truths fully stated in Rom. ii. But it is quite passing here ; the main point here being, not the harsh estimate of Gentiles by Pharisees, but the real difference in covenant-position which that estimate exaggerated. made by hands] Better, wrought by hand. Cp. Col. ii. 11 for the antithesis, ' ' the circumcision wrought without hands ;" a thing spiritual, invisible, the covenant mark from the Divine point of view — regeneration of nature. — The Pharisees "called" themselves "The Circumcision;" St Paul vitiates the word of privilege, or rather their use of it, by the added words, "hand-wrought, in the flesh." 12. at that time] Strictly, at that occasion. The Gr. word habitually marks limited periods; though this must not always be pressed. Here possibly there is a suggestion of the transient period of exclusion, opposed to the long eternity of acceptance. without Christ] Apart from Christ; out of connexion with the Messiah. Here no Pharisaic prejudice is in view, but the mysterious fact that only through the great prophesied Redeemer is there life and acceptance for man, and that in order to contact with Him there needs "preaching," "hearing," "believing" (Rom. x. 13, 15). Scripture does not present this fact without any relief; but all relief leaves it a phenomenon of Revelation as mysterious as it is solid. being aliens] Lit., having been alienated (the same word as iv. 18; Col. i. 21) ; as if they had once been otherwise. So, in idea, they had been. Every human soul is (occasionally) viewed in Scripture as having been originally unfallen, and, if unfallen, then in a covenant of peace with God of which the covenant of Israel was but a type. Such a view is wholly ideal, referring not to the actual history of the individual soul, but to the Nature of which the individual is a specimen. Such popular phrases as, " we are fallen creatures," have this truth below them. Historically, we begin prostrate ; ideally, we began upright, and have fallen. the commonwealth of Israel] Perhaps, "the citizenship." The Gr. word occurs elsewhere, in N. T., Acts xxii. 28 only (A. V., "this freedom;" the Roman citizenship). But the A. V. here (and so R. V.) is favoured by the word "alienated." It is rather more natural to say " made aliens from a state," than " made aliens from state-rights." The two interpretations, however, perfectly coincide practically. "Israel," (the Covenant-People with its special name of sacred dignity; see Trench, N. T. Synonyms, § xxxix ;) is viewed as an ordered common wealth or empire under its Divine King ; and to be free of its rights is the one way to have connexion with Him. — By "Israel" the Apostle here doubtless means the inner Israel, of which the outer was as it were V. 12.] EPHESIANS, II. 77 of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world : the husk; see Rom. ix. 6. But he does not emphasize a distinction. Under the Old Covenant, it was generally necessary to belong, in some sense, to the outer Israel in order to be one of the inner. strangers] The Gr. is a word familiar in civic connexions ; non- members of a state or city. the covenants of promise] Lit., and better, of the Promise, the great Promise of Messiah, according to which those who "are of the Messiah, are Abraham's seed, and heirs by promise" (Gal. iii. 29). In the light of Gal. iii. 18, we may say that the Promise is more specially of Justi fication, Acceptance, (as in Abraham's case,) through faith, securing vital connexion with the Messiah. " Covenants : " — for the plural cp. Rom. ix. 4. The reference is to the many Compacts, as with Abraham, Moses, Levi, David, Joshua ; and perhaps to the New Covenant itself, as of course "connected with" the Promise. — The Promise indicated, from the first, blessings for the world, "all the families of the earth"; but these blessings were to be found only "in Abraham and his seed" (Gen. xii. 3, xxii. 18) ; and thus to those not yet connected with Abraham and the Messiah there was no actual portion yet in the "covenants." having no hope] The Gr. just indicates (by its special negative particle) that this was not only so, but felt by the Gentiles to be so ; "having, as you knew, no hope." (So, precisely, 1 Thess. iv. 13.) The deep truth of this is fully attested by classical and other heathen literature, old or modern. Aspiration and conjecture there often was, but no hope, in the Scripture sense; no expectation on a firm basis. A profound uncertainty about the unseen and eternal underlies many of the strongest expressions of the classical poets and philosophers. And in the special reference of "hope" here, hope of a Redeemer and a redeemed inheritance, there was (and is) a total blank, apart from revelation. — "In Hellas, at the epoch of Alexander the Great, it was a current saying, and one profoundly felt by all the best men, that the best thing of all was not to be born, and the next best to die." (Mommsen, Hist, of Rome, Eng. transl. Vol. IV. pt. ii. p. 586). See the thought still earlier, Sophocles, Old. Col. 1224 (Dindorf). without God] Lit., Godless; without true knowledge of the true God. "Gods many" were indeed, in some sense, popularly believed in ; and large schools of thought recognized a One Supreme, though often with the very faintest views of personality. But this recognition, at its best and highest, lacked some essentials in the Idea of the True God, above all, the union in Him of supreme Love and awful Purity. And for the average mind of ancient heathenism He "was not, in all the thoughts," as truly as the impersonal Brahm "is not" in the average Hindoo mind. See further, Appendix D. in the world] Words which complete the dark picture. "In the world" of fallen humanity, with its dreadful realities of evil, they did not "know the only true God, and Jesus Christ Whom He had sent" (Joh. xvii. 3), and so lacked the one possible preservative and spiritual life-power. 78 EPHESIANS, II. [vv. 13, 14. 13 but now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are 14 made nigh by the blood of Christ. For he is our peace, 13. bul now] under the changed conditions of actual and accepted Redemption. in Christ Jesus] In living union with the true Messiah. Just before, ver. 12, we have "without Christ" merely; here, "in Christ Jesus." The Messiah of Prophecy is now known as also the Jesus of the Gospel. sometimes] Once, as R. V. The A. V. uses a word now antiquated in this sense, or appearing only as "sometime" — the word used here in Wiclif's Version (1382), in " The Great Bible" (1539), and the Rhemish Version (1582). far off.. .nigh] That is, from and to the Citizenship of Israel and the Covenants of promise; the realm, in fact, of Messiah. Cp. Acts ii. 39, and see Isai. Ivii. 19. — The thought of remoteness and nearness in respect of God is of course implied, and comes out clearly in ver. 18; but it is not the immediate thought of this passage, which rather speaks of the incorporation of once heathen souls into the true Israel. But the two views cannot be quite separated. — "Nigh" and "far" were familiar terms with the Rabbis in the sense of having or not having part in the covenant. Wetstein on this verse quotes, inter alia, the following from the Talmud : "A woman came to R. Eliezer, to be made a proselyte ; saying to him, Rabbi, make me nigh. He refused her, and she went to R. Joshua, who received her. The scholars of R. Joshua therefore said, Did R. Eliezer put her far off, and dost thou make her nigh?" by the blood of Christ] Lit. and better, In the blood, &c. To illustrate the phrase cp. Heb. ix. 22, 25; "almost all things according to the law are purged in blood; " " the High Priest entereth the Holy Place.. .in blood not his own." Whatever the first use of the phrase, it had thus become an almost technicality of sacrificial language, nearly equalling "with (shed) blood" as the accompanying condition of acceptable approach. It is not necessary to import into the idea here the other, though kindred, idea of washing in blood, or even of surrounding with a circle of sprinkled blood. The "in" is, by usage, as nearly instrumental as possible. The sacred bloodshedding of the Messiah's sacrificial death for His true Israel was the necessary condi tion to, and so instrument of, the admission of the new Gentile members. It is the "blood of the covenant" (Exod. xxiv. 8; quoted Heb. ix. 20) ; and cp. the all-important words of the Lord Himself (Matt. xxvi. 28), "This is My blood ofthe new Covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. " 14. he is our peace] "He:" — the glorious living Person gives its essence to the sacrificial Work. " Our peace:" — i.e., as the connexion indicates, the "peace" between the Tribes of the New Israel, the Gentile and Jewish believers ; such peace that now, within the covenant, "there is neither Jew nor Greek " (Gal. iii. 28; Col. iii. 11). The special aspect of this truth here is the admission of the non-Jewish believer to the inmost fulness of spiritual v. IS-] EPHESIANS, II. 79 who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us; having abolished in his flesh 15 privilege ; but this is so stated as to imply the tender companion truth that he comes in not as a conquering intruder but as a brother, side by side with the Jewish believer, in equal and harmonious peace with God. who hath made both one] Lit., Who made both things one thing. "Both" and "one" are neuters in the Gr. The idea is rather of posi tions and relations than of persons (Monod). — "One:" — "one thing," one community, or rather, one organism. (By the same word is ex pressed the Unity of the Father and the Son, Joh. x. 30. ) In Gal. iii. 28 ("ye are all one") the Gr. has the masculine, "one [person]," "one [man]," as expressly in the next verse here. hath broken down... partition] Lit., did undo the mid- wall of the fence, or hedge. The next verse makes it clear that this means the Law. In Divine intention the Law was a "hedge" (Isai. v. 2) round the Old Israel, so long as their chief function was to maintain a position of se clusion. And it thus formed a "partition" between the Old Israel and the outer world, not only hindering but, for the time, forbidding such fusion as the new order brought in. It is possible that the phrase was immediately suggested by the de marcation between the Court of the Gentiles and the inner area of the Temple. 15. having abolished, &c] Lit., The enmity, in His flesh, the law of the commandments In decrees, annulling. In this difficult verse our best guide is the Ep. to the Romans, esp. vii. 1 — 6, viii. 2, 3, passages very possibly in mind when this was written. See also the closely parallel passage, Col. i. 21, 22. With these in view we may interpret this to teach that the Lord, by His death (Col. i. 22), " in the likeness of the flesh of sin" (Rom. viii. 3), broke ("annulled") for all believers their condemning relations with the Law (in the highest sense of the word Law), as a preceptive code, prescribing but not enabling, — a code imposing absolute decrees as the absolute condition of accept ance ; and thereby, ipso facto, brought to an end the Mosaic ordinances with their exclusions, which existed mainly to prefigure this Work, and to entorce the fact of its necessity, and incidentally to "fence in" the race through whom the Messiah, as the Worker, was to come. The passage thus teaches that Christ has "annulled" the old anti pathy between Jew and Gentile, by what He did in dying. But it cannot teach this without teaching also the deep underlying truth that He did it by effecting relations of acceptance and peace between Man and God ; not putting aside the Preceptive Law as a thing obsolete, but so "going behind it" in his Atonement as to put believing man in a different relation to it, and so, and only so, removing the external hedges of privilege and exclusion. Comparing Col. i. 21, 22, it is plain that this greater reconciliation lies, in the Apostle's thought, behind the lesser, though the lesser is more immediately in point. " The commandments in decrees" are, doubtless, in part, the "touch 80 EPHESIANS, II. [v. 16. the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances ; for to make in himself of twain one new man, ¦6 so making peace ; and that he might reconcile both unto not, taste not," of ceremonial restrictions; but not these only. They are the whole system of positive edict, moral as well as ceremonial, taken apart from enabling motive, and viewed as the conditions of peace with God. "The enmity, even the law &c.,'' may be fairly paraphrased, "the enmity, expressed and emphasized (under the circumstances of the Fall) by the Law, by its existence and claims as preceptive Law." for to make] In order to create. " It is a new creation," 2 Cor. v. 17; where the reference is to the regenerate individual, as here to the community of the regenerate. in himself] Perhaps, in Him. But the reference is in either case to Christ, the subject of the whole context. Cp. Col. i. 16, where " In Him were created" is used ofthe First Creation. In both Creations, Old and New, Christ is the Cause and Bond of being. The New Man, like the Universe, exists and consists by vital union with Him. one new man] The phrase "new man" occurs only here and iv. 24, where see note. Here the great organism of the saints, Jew and Gentile, is viewed as, so to speak, one Person ; a view closely akin to that of the "One Body" of Christ; 1 Cor. xii., &c. "We are all in God's sighl but one in Christ, as we are all one in Adam" (Alford). The Old Race is solidaire with its Head, Adam, by solidarity of Nature in itself and of standing towards God. So the New Race is solidaire with its Head, Christ, in Whom, and at once, it both receives the standing of justified acceptance for His Merits, and derives " Divine Nature " by His Spirit. And solidarity with the Head seals the mutual solidarity ofthe members. As the Old Race is not only men, but Man, so the New Race is not only new men, but New Man. so making peace] Here, as just above, the immediate thought is of the reconciliation of Jew and Gentile in Christ, but behind it lies the thought of that greater reconciliation which is expressed fully ver. 18; " access through Christ, for both, in one Spirit unto the Father ; " and just below. 16. reconcile both unto God] The Gr. verb here rendered " reconcile '' occurs elsewhere (in exactly the same form) only Col. i. 20, 21 ; but a form nearly identical occurs e.g. Rom. v. 10; 1 Cor. vii. 11; 2 Cor. v. 18, 19, 20. The idea of the verb is on the whole that of the propitiation of an alienated superior, to whom offending inferiors are, with his consent, led back as accepted suppliants. God (2 Cor. v. 19) "reconciled the world unto Himself" by providing, in His Son, the Divine pacification of the Divine displeasure against the world. Christ " reconciles us to God " by being and effecting that pacification. Hence Reconciliation, in practice, nearly approaches to both the ideas, Atonement and Justifi- . cation. The Lord, here, "by the cross," reconciles the Church to God ; effects its acceptance ; secures the " non-imputation of trespasses" (2 Cor. v. 19). vv. 17, 18.] EPHESIANS, II. 81 God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby: and came and preached peace to you which 17 were afar off, and to them that were nigh; for through >8 "Both":— here in the masculine plural; both great groups, Jewish and Gentile believers. in one body] A phrase in contrast (see last note) to " both ; " the two groups become the One Body, the One Man, of ver. 15. by the cross] The only mention of it in this Epistle. Observe here, as consistently in the N. T., the isolation of the Lord's Death from His Life-work, where ideas of atonement are in view ; a fact most suggestive of the doctrine that that Death was a true and proper propitiatory Sacri fice, an altar- work, and not only a supreme act of self-sacrificing sympathy with man's need and God's holiness. For on the latter view there is no clear line of demarcation between the Death and the self-sacrificing Life. — Cp. the parallel, Col. i. 20 ("the blood of the Cross"), and see above on i. 7. having slain the enmity thereby] I.e. by the Cross, the Atoning Death. — "The enmity:" — that spoken of ver. 15; immediately, that between Jew and Gentile ; ultimately (for this underlies the conditions of the existence of that other) that between man and God (Rom. viii. 7). — "Slain:" — a word chosen, instead of e.g. "cancelled," "abolished," because the work was done through death. What was really, in final effect, executed at Calvary was the obstacle to peace; whether peace in the sense of the harmony of redeemed souls, or peace in the sense of reconciliation to God, the basis ofthe other. Cp. Col. ii. 14. 17. and came] from the work of the Cross, from the Grave. " Peace " was His first word in Resurrection-life to His gathered Church (Joh. xx. 19) ; and that Church was then, and not till then, sent to the world, "far off" as well as "nigh," to be an "ambassador on behalf of Christ" (2 Cor. v. 20), representing Him in His preaching ministry of peace. Thus vicariously, but really, had He "come" to the Ephesians among others. — Cp. Acts iii. 26; "God, having raised up His Son Jesus, sent Him to bless you;" and, for the phrase "preaching peace," Acts x. 36. peace] The word and thought still, as before, refer immediately to the inner harmony of the New Israel, ultimately to that Israel's "peace with God." The next verse suggests this double reference; (1) "we both have access &c. ;" (2) "we have access unto the Father." to you. ..nigh] See on ver. 13. The whole phrase is from Isai. Ivii. 19, "Peace, peace, to him that is far off and to him that is near, saith the Lord" (LXX., "to them that are far off &c"). The Apostle im plicitly claims the Prophet as foretelling (whether he knew it or not) peace in and to the New Israel. — The best reading here repeats "peace;" "and peace to them that were nigh." 18. for] It is possible to render "that," and so to make this the substance of the message of "peace." The difference is not important. But it is grammatically better to retain A.V. (and R.V.). ephesians 6 82 EPHESIANS, II. [v. 19. him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father. ¦9 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but both] Masculine plural, as ver. 16, where see note. Both the great groups, in all their individual members, have this access. access] Better, our Introduction; the proper meaning of the original word, reminding the accepted Christian that he owes his freedom of entrance to Another. True, the freedom is present, perpetual, and as sured ; but it not only was first secured by the Redeemer's work, but rests every moment on that work for its permanence. We are, thanks be to God, evermore free to and in His presence-chamber, but we are also evermore free there "through His Son," Who "ever liveth to make intercession for us." — The word occurs elsewhere Rom. v. 2 ; and below, iii. 12. by one Spirit] Lit. and better, In one Spirit; surrounded, animated, penetrated, by the Spirit. This is undoubtedly the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, so largely in view in this Epistle. Cp. 2 Cor. xiii. 14; 1 Pet. i. 2; Jude 20, 21 ; among other passages, for a similar implicit recognition of the Persons of the Holy Trinity in the Divine harmony of their actions for and relations to the saints. "One." — in contrast to the "both." See Acts x. for the fact that even to Apostles after Pentecost it was still a discovery that the Holy Ghost should visit and bless Gentiles with the same freedom and fulness as Jews. the Father] "His Father and our Father;" Joh. xx. 17. This pro found word, rich in life, love, and joy, was indeed a new treasure, in its Christian sense, to "them that were afar off." No pagan mythology, or philosophy, though the word was not unknown to them, knew the thing; the Divine reality of an eternal and paternal Holy Love. To the Israelite the Lord was indeed known as " like unto a Father pitying his children" (Psal. ciii. 13); "doubtless our Father" (Isai. lxiii. 16); but even to him the word would develope into inexhaustible riches when read in the light of the Sonship of the true Messiah. Observe that the approach of the soul is here, as always, ultimately to the Father. Not that the Son, and the Spirit, are not eternal and Divine ; but He is — the Father. 19. Now therefore ye] He now turns direct to the Gentile believers, and rejoicingly recounts to them the actual grandeur of their privileges in grace. no more] as you once were. See on ver. 12 above. The finished work of Christ, realized by accepting faith, has entirely broken for them the old regime. strangers] " to the covenants of the Promise ; " ver. 12. foreigners] In secular matters, the word would mean a resident alien, a non-naturalized foreigner ; liable to legal removal at any moment, e.g. on outbreak of war. If such a word were true of Gentile Christians, they would be merely tolerated sojourners, as it were, in the "city" of" Messianic light and mercy, without any claim to abide. The glorious contrary was the case. " If they were Christ's, they were Abraham's v. 2o.] EPHESIANS, II. 83 fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God ; and are built upon the foundation of the apostles and <*° seed, and heirs [of the Gospel Canaan] according to Promise" (Gal. iii. 29). but] Insert, with MSS., ye are, after this word ; an additional em phasis of assertion. fellowcitizens] Cp. Gal. iv. 26; Phil. iii. 20 (Greek); Heb. xi. 10, 16; Rev. iii. 12, &c. the saints] " Not angels, nor Jews, nor Christians then alive merely, but the saints of God !n the widest sense — all members of the mystical body of Christ" (Alford). See further on the word, note on i. 1. of the household] Members of the family, kinsfolk. So the word always means in N.T. (Gal. vi. 10; 1 Tim. v. 8; here;) : nd LXX. The idea is not of domestic service, but ofthe "child at home." In the deepest sense the Gentile believer, once "far off " in both position and condition, is now at home with his Living Father in Christ. 20. and are built] Better, Having been built ; once built (aorist), by your Redeemer. The metaphor here boldly changes, from the inmates of city and house, to the structure. Possibly the element " house" in "household" suggested this. For similar imagery, cp. 1 Cor. iii. 9, 10; [ Pet. ii. 4 — 8; Jude 20; and see Matt. vii. 24, 25. And for curious developments of the imagery here, in very early Christian literature, see St Ignatius Ep. to the Eph., ch. IX, and the Shepherd of Her?nas, 'Vision' iii. And for an application of the imagery in ancient hymnology, the hymn (cent. 8 or 9) Urbs beata Hirusalem (Trench, Sacr. Lat. Poetry, p. 311). the foundation of the apostles and prophets] The foundation which consists of them ; in the sense that their doctrine is the basis of the faith, and so of the unity, of the saints. Cp. Rev. xxi. 14; and the words spoken (Matt. xvi. 18) to Peter, "upon this rock I will build My Church." Not to enter into the details there, it is plain that the personal address to Peter is deeply connected with the revelation to and confession by Peter of the Truth of Christ. The Collect for the day of SS. Simon and Jude, constructed from this passage, is a true comment on it. " The apostles and prophets :" — Who are the Prophets here? Those of the O. T. or those of the Gospel, (for whom cp. e.g. iii. 5, iv. 11 ; Acts xv. 32; and often)? For the first alternative, it is a strong plea that the O. T. prophets are always regarded in the N. T. as Evangelists before the time; cp. e.g. Luke xxiv. 25; Acts iii. 18, 21, 24, x. 43; Rom. xvi. 26. The last passage regards the "prophetic scriptures" as the great instrument of apostolic preaching. But on the other hand we should thus have expected ' 'prophets and apostles " to be the order of mention. And iii. 5, giving the same phrase with distinct reference to the "prophets" of the Gospel, is a parallel nearly conclusive in itself in favour of that reference here. In iv. 11, again, we have the "prophet" named nextto the "Apostle" among the gifts of the glorified Saviour to this Church ; a suggestion of the great prominence and 6—2 84 EPHESIANS, II. [v. 21 prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner 21 stone; in whom all the building fitly framed together grow- importance of the function. We take the word here, then, to mean such "prophets" as Judas and Silas (Acts xv. 32); men, we gather, who, though not of one office with the Apostles, shared some of their functions ; were directly inspired, on occasion, with knowledge of the future (Acts xi. 28), and with truth of spiritual doctrine (iii. 5, and 1 Cor. xiv); and were specially commissioned to preach and teach such things revealed. May we not probably class the non-apostolic writers ofthe N. T. among these "prophets"? See further, Appendix F. The mention of them here is in special point, because public faith and doctrine is in question. The work of the "prophets" had, doubtless, greatly contributed to the wide spread and settlement of the truth of the free acceptance in Christ of all believers, Gentiles with Jews. Observe that in Acts xv. 32 it is two "prophets" who "exhort and confirm" (the Gr. word suggests precisely settlement on a foundation) the Gentile believers at Antioch, in the very crisis of the conflict between Pharisaic limits and the universality of the Gospel. Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone] It is possible to render "the chief corner stone of it (the foundation) being Christ Jesus;" but far less probable. The "Himself" is almost demanded by the separation and contrast ofthe supreme position of the Lord. So R. V. — There is a slight emphasis, by position, on "being." "The chief corner stone:" — one word in the Gr. ; found also 1 Pet. ii. 6; where Isai. xxviii. 16 (LXX.) is quoted nearly verbatim. Precisely, the LXX. there runs, "I lay among the foundations of Sion a stone costly, chosen, chief of the corner, precious;" words which indicate that the idea, to the Greek translators, was that of a stone essential to the foundation, not in the higher structure ; and this is confirmed by St Peter's use of the quotation. Thus on the whole we take the image to be that of a vast stone at an angle of the substructure, into which the converging sides are imbedded, "in which" they "consist;" and the spiritual reality to be, that Jesus Christ Himself is that which gives coherence and fixity to the foundation doctrines of His Church; with the implied idea that He is the essential to the foundation, being the ultimate Foundation (1 Cor. iii. 11). Apostles and Prophets reveal and enforce a basis of truths for the rest and settlement of the saints' faith ; those truths, at every point of juncture and prominence, are seen to be wholly dependent on Jesus Christ for significance, har mony and permanence. In the Heb. of Isai. xxviii. 16 (and so, or nearly, Job xxxviii. 6; Psal. cxviii. 22 (Messianic); Jer. Ii. 26) the phrase is "stone," or "head," of "corner," or of "prominence." See too Zech. x. 4, where the solitary word "corner" appears to convey the same image. 21. in whom] In close and vital connexion with Whom. See last note. all the building] R. V., "each several building;" as if the great Temple were viewed for the moment in its multiplicity of porches, v. 22.] EPHESIANS, II. 85 eth unto a holy temple in the Lord : in whom you also are 22 courts, and towers ; each connected with the great bond of the sub structure, in and on which the whole architecture was rising. — An interesting grammatical question arises over the reading here and this rendering, and will occur again iii. 15 : — does the Greek phrase, in the best attested reading, demand the rendering of the R. V. as against that of the A. V.? We incline to the reply that it does not. The law of the definite article (the absence of which here occasions the question) is undoubtedly somewhat less exact in the Greek of the Scriptures than in that of the classics. And this leaves us free to use (with caution) the context to decide problems which in the classics would be decided by pure grammar. Such a case we take this to be ; and the question to ask is, does the context favour the imagery of detail or that of total? Surely the latter. The idea points to one great building, getting completed within itself, rising to its ideal. We retain accordingly the A. V. See further, next note. fitly framed together] One word, a present participle, in the Greek. The same occurs below, iv. 16 (" fitly joined together"), and nowhere else in N. T. The idea is not of a completed but of a progressive work, a "framing together" of the structure ever more closely and firmly. The building shrinks into greater solidity, binds itself into more intense coherence, as it grows. The spiritual union of the saints needs but to be more believed and realized to tell more on their actual closeness of connexion. — The idea conveyed by this word, which is of course in the singular number, is (see last note) far rather that of one great building growing in internal solidity than of many buildings growing in contact. groweth] with the perpetual addition of new "living stones" (1 Pet. ii. 5) and the resulting new connexions. Observe two distinct ideas in harmony ; growth in compactness, growth in extension. unto a holy temple] R. V., margin, "into an holy sanctuary.'' The Greek (ndos) is not the tem-p\e-area with its courts and porches (hieron), but the temple-house; the place ofthe Presence. — The phrase, "unto," "into," suggests (like that in the next verse) a sanctuary not yet complete and ready for the Presence. The true Church, indeed, is already (1 Cor. iii. 16; 2 Cor. vi. 16; and cp. 1 Cor. vi. 19 of its individual members) "the sanctuary of the living God." But it is this as a still imperfect thing, and still imperfectly; the absolute and final in the matter is yet to come; and this will so transcend the partial and actual that it is spoken of as if the Indwelling were hot yet. We may faintly illustrate by an unfinished cathedral, used already for Divine worship, but not yet ideally prepared for it. — See Rev. xxi. 22 for another side of truth in temple-imagery. There, in the final state, there is "no sanctuary," for God and the Lamb "are the sanctuary of" the holy City. All, absolutely all, is hallowed by Their Presence indwelling; Sanctuary and Shechinah are, as it were, one ; and nothing is there that is not Sanctuary. Great indeed is the conception in this passage. The saints, in their community "in the Lord," are preparing, through an Indwelling partial 86 EPHESIANS, II. [v. 22. builded together for a habitation of God through the Spirit though real, for an Indwelling complete and eternal; the two being, in continuity, one. In no mere figure of speech, their God already "dwells" in their bodies, and in their community; dwells there as in a Sanctuary — in manifested Light, in Peace of covenant and propitiation, in Oracle-speech of "the Spirit's witness," in eternal Life. And this precious present fact is germinating to the future result of a heavenly and everlasting Indwelling (likewise in individuals and in community), when the Sanctuary shall reflect without a flaw its Indweller's glory ; when our union and communion with Him, in other words, shall be perfect, absolute, ideal. " We shall be like Him ; for we shall see Him as He is." in the Lord] The Lord Christ. We have "God" in the next verse, in a way which indicates this distinctive reference here. The imagery leaves the precise idea of the Corner Stone, to present the Lord as the living bond and principle, the secret both of growth and sanctity. 22. you also] He reminds them of the joyful fact that they are special examples of the general truth that "the Gentiles are fellow-heirs." are builded] A present tense in the Greek; are building, being builded. It is a process ; carried on in new accessions of regenerate souls, and new and deeper "framing together" of the already regenerate. for a habitation] For the significance of "for," see remarks on "unto" in ver. 21. — The word rendered "habitation" (elsewhere Rev. xviii. 2 only) means, by its form, emphatically a permanent abode. The true idea is of the eternal Indwelling of God in the glorified Church. But this is reached through the lasting, though partial, Indwelling now. See notes above; and below, on iii. 17. God] Not here specially Christ. The prospect is of the world where "God shall be all in all" (1 Cor. xv. 28), words which foretell no removal (God forbid) of "the Lamb" from "the Throne," but a manifestation of the Father supreme and unimaginable. Meanwhile, again, the present is the germ of that Future; "My Father will love him, and We will come unto him, and make Our abode with him" (Joh. xiv. 231) ; and "ye are the temple ofthe living God" (2 Cor. vi. 16). through the Spirit] Lit. and better, in (the) Spirit. The living Temple, in its every stone, is what it is by the immediate action of the Holy Spirit, " Who sanctifieth the elect people of God." They are thus "in the Spirit" (Rom. viii. 9), surrounded, as it were, by His presence and power. And so it will be, as this passage indicates, in the final state where the "pure River" will still "proceed from the Throne of" the Father and the Son. Will not the Holy Spirit's work, far from ceasing, be supremely effectual, in the world of "spiritual bodies" (1 Cor. xv. 44)? We undoubtingly explain "in spirit" here to mean "in the Spirit" 1 The one passage where the coming of the Father is spoken of. What awful grandeur is bestowed by this 'We' on the believer! (Note by the Dean of Peterborough). v. I.] EPHESIANS, III. 87 For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you 3 (with A. V. and R. V.), remembering the prominence in the whole Epistle, and not least in this part, of the subject of the Holy Spirit's work. Thus closes the special revelation of the plan and nature of the great Living Sanctuary, built on the Son, by the Spirit, for the Father, to be the scene of the manifestation of His Glory to whatsoever spectators Eternity shall bring to see it. Ch. III. 1 — 13. He would pursue the subject of the Temple, but digresses to say more of the world-wide scope of the Gospel. For this cause] With such a present and such a future for my reason, motive, hope. Here begins a sentence broken immediately by a great digression. Where is it resumed? At ver. 8, or at ver. 13, or at ver. 14? On the whole we decide for the latter, not only because the identi cal phrase "for this cause" recurs there, but because the thought of the Indweller, and the Foundation (" grounded," ver. 17), recurs there also. It is thus as if the Apostle had been just about to pray that the great Lord of the Temple might take a new (an ever new) possession of the Edifice preparing for Him; but had been diverted, by the designation he gives himself, to speak at large of his Gentile commission. For a parenthesis on the like scale see the latter half of Rom. v. Such deviations into side-fields of pregnant thought are characteristic of some minds of high calibre ; and we are never to forget that while it is' everywhere the Inspirer who speaks through the Apostle, He as truly uses the Apostle's type of mind as He uses the Greek type of language to be His perfect vehicle of expression. I Paul] For a. similar emphatic Ego, cp. 2 Cor. x. 1 ; Gal. v. 2 ; Col. i. 23; Philem. 19. (1 Thess. ii. 18 is not quite in point, nor the passages, Col. iv. 18; 2 Thess. iii. 17; where he speaks of his autograph name.) The motive here seems to be the profound personal interest of the Apostle in his great commission, brought to the surface by the statement he has just made of the grandeur of its issue in the completion of the Temple of the Universal Church. "It is I, positively I, who am, wonderful to say, chief minister in the process." And there may also be the emphasis of intense personal interest in the Ephesian converts; a loving pressure, so to speak, of his personality upon theirs. — On the "self-consciousness" of St Paul, see Howson, Character of St Paul, Lect. II. the prisoner of Jesus Christ] So Philem. 1, 9; 2 Tim. i. 8; and below, iv. 1, with an interesting difference, which see. Our Epistle thus stands grouped with Philippians, Colossians, Philemon, 2 Timothy, as an Epistle written from prison. — "Of Jesus Christ": — under all aspects of life Paul belongs to Christ. Whatever he is, does, or suffers, it is as Christ's property. There is also an obvious reference to the fact that his imprisonment v/ssfor Christ's cause; but this is not all. /or you] On behalf of you. See Acts xxii. 21 for illustration. His 88 EPHESIANS, III. [w. 2, 3. s Gentiles, if ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace 3 of God which is given me to you-ward : how that by revela tion he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore imprisonment, due to Jewish hostility, was thus ultimately due to his assertion of the free welcome of the Gentiles to Messiah's covenant. Acts xv. records the crisis within the Church which corresponded to this assault from without. 2. If ye have heard of] Lit. if so be that ye heard of. This phrase occasions the question, Could this Epistle have been addressed to a Church familiar with St Paul? And it has thus seemed, to some extreme critics, an argument against the genuineness of the Epistle, a lapsus pluma on the part of a fabricator; and, in very different quarters, an argument against the special destination to Ephesus (see Introduction, ch. iii). Not here to notice the anti-Pauline inference it is enough to say of the anti- Ephesian that it proves too much. What was known of Paul in the Ephesian Church would practically be known of him throughout the missions of Asia (see Acts xix. 10, 26), so that the phrase remains as difficult as before. The true account of it, surely, is that it is a phrase of almost irony, an allusion to well-known fact under the disguise of hypothesis. His Gentile com- ¦ mission was no new thing, and was widely known, when this clause was written; but a natural and beautiful rhetoric prefers to treat it as if possibly obscure or forgotten. — That St Paul had never been silent at Ephesus on the subject appears from Acts xix. 8, 9, where we see him withdrawing the converts from the synagogue. the dispensation] The stewardship. For the figure, cp. 1 Cor. iv. 1, 2, ix. 17; Col. i. 25; 1 Pet. iv. 10. the grace of God which is given me] Such is the grammatical con nexion; not the "stewardship" but the "grace" is the thing given. And the " grace " is explained by Rom. i. 5 (" grace and apostleship ") and below, ver. 7, 8. It was the loving gift of commission and inspira tion to preach Christ among the Gentiles. — For similar allusions to his life-work cp. Acts xxii. 21, xxvi. 17, 18; Rom. i. 5, xi. 13; Gal. ii. 1, 9. 3. by revelation] Probably at or about the time of his conversion. Acts xxvi. 17, 18, indicates that the Lord then and there gave him the special commission, and itis likely that a period of special and direct Divine instruction followed, perhaps in "Arabia" (Gal. i. 17). See Gal. i. 11, &.c. for the positive assertion that "his gospel" was a direct revelation, and the connexion of this with events at and just after the conversion. Perhaps visions such as St Peter's (Acts x.) entered into the process. It is a wonderful paradox, yet deeply truth-like, that the great champion of Pharisaism should have been chosen to be the Apostle of the heathen. — For the phrase, "by revelation," cp. Rom. xvi. 25 (Greek) ; Gal. ii. 2 ; and for St Paul's claim to be a recipient of revelations, 2 Cor. xii. 1, 7; Gal. i. 16. he made known] Better, was made known. the mystery] Explained below, ver. 5, 6, as being the long-kept vv. 4— 6.] EPHESIANS, III. 89 in few words, whereby, when ye read, ye may understand 4 my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) which in other ages s was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now re vealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; that the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same 6 secret of the absolutely equal welcome to Christ of the Gentile with the Jew. — On the word "mystery," see note on i. 9. as I wrote afore] The reference is to previous passages in this Epistle ; i. 9, &c, ii. n, &c. English idiom would say, as I have written afore. 4. may understand] R.V., can perceive; and so better. my knowledge] Better, Intelligence, understanding (R.V.). The thought is, not any laudation bf the Apostle's intellect, but substantia tion of his God-granted insight, verified by the spiritual reader, and re sulting in further confidence on the reader's part. of Christ] The great Secret was bound up with His work (ii. 14) and His glory (i. 10). As to experience, its essence was " Christ in you, the hope of glory" (Col. i. 27). See also Col. i. 27; where, probably, read " the mystery of God, [which mystery is] Christ." 5. ages] Better, generations. The reference (see next words) is to human time, and the periods before the Gospel. unto the sons of men] A designedly large phrase ; mankind in general, both inside and outside the Jewish pale. Outside, the secret was wholly unknown; inside, it was only dimly and sparingly intimated, though certainly intimated (cp. Acts xiii. 47; Rom. xv. 8 — 12). That itwas in some measure revealed is suggested by the phrase here, "As it is now &c." On the present scale, in the present mode, it was not then re vealed; but not therefore quite concealed. But the O.T. hints were after all little more than prepared materials for N.T. revelation. his holy apostles and prophets] On the " prophets," see note on ii. 20. — The recipients are called "holy " to mark their special nearness to, and knowledge of, tlie revealing God, and so the absolute truth of their report. by the Spirit] Lit., and better, In [the] Spirit. They were "in the Spirit" (Rev. i. 10) while receiving the knowledge ofthe great mystery. The Holy Ghost possessed them, that He might inform them. 6. That the Gentiles, &c] It is well to pause over a passage like this, and reflect that what seems now to be an axiom of religious thought, the equality of mankind in view of the offer of salvation, was once an immense and long-withheld discoveiy. See above, on ii. 11. should be] Better, are ; in the plan of God, now disclosed. fellowheirs] Cp. Rom. viii. 17; Gal. iii. 29, iv. 7. They are the children of God and brethren of Christ, equally with Jewish believers, and so equally heirs of their Father's kingdom; "joint-heirs with Christ" of "the better country, that is the heavenly" (Heb. xi. 16). ofthe same body] Better, fellow-members, a version which preserves the likeness of the two Greek words represented by this expression and "fellowheirs" respectively. On " the body," see notes on ii. 16. 90 EPHESIANS, III. [vv. 7—9. body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel: 7 whereof I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his 8 power. Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that / should preach among the Gentiles 9 the unsearchable riches of Christ ; and to make all men see partakers] Fellow-partakers, R.V., still preserving the similarities of the Greek. his promise] See on ii. 12. Read, the promise. in Christ] Only in vital union with Christ was the promise to be inherited. It was inextricably involved in Him. by the gospel] Better, by means of the Gospel; the instrument by which the Divine Plan of Gentile incorporation is to be made actual. Cp. 1 Cor. iv. 15, "I begot you by means of the Gospel." See also Rom. x. 8 — 15, xvi. 25, 26. 7. u minister] Didconos, a worker, helper. Cp. Col. i. 23. The word implies activity and subordination. — "I " here is not emphatic. according to the gift, &c] See above on ver. 2. The "gift" includes the commission and the inspiration. His "ministry," both in field and in effect, was " according to " this great gift. given] I.e. (by the best attested reading) the grace which was given. So R.V. " the gift of that grace which was given. " by the effectual working &c] Read certainly, according to the work ing, &c. For similar phrases cp. i. 19; Phil. iii. 21 ; and esp. Col. i. 29, where, as here, he speaks of working "according to" a power experi enced by himself. — A comma should be read before this second "ac cording to." The statement is that he "became a minister, according to," in a way explained by, two things, a Divine Gift, and a Divine working Power. Observe the recognition, at once restful and energizing, that the actual movements of the power of God were the force behind all his apostolic activity. "By Him he moves, in Him he lives." Cp. besides Col. i. 29 just cited, 1 Cor. xv. 10; 2 Cor. iii. 5, iv. 7, xii. 9, 10; Gal. ii. 20; Phil. iv. 13; Col. i. 11. 8. Unto me] A slight pause and new start here occurs in the long parenthesis. The thought of his commission, and of the Divine power which enabled him, leads by contrast to the thought of the personal in significance and unworthiness of the subject of that power, in view of the field and of the message. less than the least] One Greek word, and that a unique one. It is a comparative-superlative; "more least," "leaster," where "lesser" would be the regular form. The holy intensity of thought breaks the bounds of accidence. For the sentiment — no flight of rhetoric, but the strong and true result of a profound view of the glory and mercy of Christ — cp. 1 Cor. xv. 9; 1 Tim. i. 15, 16. this grace] See on ver. 2 above. among] Better, unto. unsearchable] Lit., "not to be tracked by footprints," a deeply sug- v. 9-] EPHESIANS, III. 91 what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the be ginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all gestive word. In N.T. the word occurs only here and Rom. xi. 33 (A. V., "past finding out"). In the LXX. it appears thrice, in the Book of Job; v. 9, ix. 10, xxxiv. 24. riches] See on i. 7 for St Paul's love of this and kindred words. The whole phrase here before us is one of the greatest in holy Scripture. It presents the truths, harmonized into one truth, of the simplicity and the infinity of the Gospel. All is centralized in Christ, the Christ of Pauline, of New Testament, theology, the Incarnate Son slain, risen, and glorified ; and from that Centre diverge countless lines of application to every need of the human soul. A Gospel thus described is totally different from an ethical code, or system ; and equally different from a mere growth, however sublime, of human sentiment and aspira tion. It claims to be nothing less than a direct unfolding of Divine resources of love and power. — See Appendix E for a remarkable inci dent in Christian biography, connected with this clause. 9. and to make all men see] Lit., "to illuminate all men." The Latin versions have illuminare omnes. — Some ancient MSS. (including the great MS. of the British Museum, and the Sinaitic), and other au thorities, omit "all men." But the external and internal evidence for retention greatly preponderates. — The idea is ofthe Apostle as "casting bright light" on the universal scope of the Gospel, in the eyes of "all men," no longer only of Jews. — The verb is the same as that in 2 Tim. i. 10; where lit., "hath thrown light upon, hath illuminated, life and immortality." Truths once in shadow are by the Gospel brought out into the sun. the fellowship] The true reading is undoubtedly dispensation, or stewardship. The reading represented by A.V. is probably an ex planation, which crept into the text; representing very nearly the mean ing of the true word. " The dispensation of the secret" is, in effect, the world-wide distribution, through the stewards of God, of the news and the blessings of the full Gospel, so long held in reserve. See notes above on vv, 2 — 6. from the beginning of the world] Lit., "from the ages;" R.V., from all ages. To define somewhat the meaning of the phrase ; the great Truth in question was hidden in comparative secrecy, from the starling point ofthe progress of the developments ("ages") of the Divine deal ings for man, up to the actual Advent of the Messiah. We gather here that this was so not only at and after the call of Israel, but in the patri archal age, and even in the angelic age, or ages. See below on ver. 10. hid in God] the great Treasury of unknown blessings. who created all things] Omit ' ' by Jesus Christ," with the preponder ance of ancient authority.— The truth of the One Creator appears here as in deep harmony with the universal scope of His Redemption. All through Scripture, in very different contexts, the truths of Creation and Redemption are seen in connexion. See a vivid illustration in Col. i., 92 EPHESIANS, III. [vv. 10, io things by Jesus Christ: to the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known ii by the church the manifold wisdom of God, according to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our where the Father, in and through the Son, both "creates all things," and " reconciles all things." 10. now] In the great "fulness of the times;" the age of the Gospel. the principalities and powers] See on i. 11. Here, as there, the reference is to " governments and authorities " in the world of holy Angels. "These things angels covet to look into" (i Pet. i. 12); as we rind them doing, for example, in the closing visions of Daniel. To their pure and powerful but still finite intelligences the work of man's Redemption is not only a touching interest, an object of benevolent at tention ; it is indescribably important, as a totally new and unique revelation of the Mind and Ways of their Lord, and perhaps (though here the hints of Scripture are few and dark) as indicating how their own bliss stands secure. — See some excellent pages on this last subject in The Incarnation of the Eternal Word, by the Rev. Marcus Dods, (i835) PP- 7—25- in heavenly places] See on i. 3. might be known] The verb implies the gift of information ab extra. The angelic mind, like the human, needs and is capable of such informa tion. by the church] Better, through. The means of information to these exalted students is God's way of redemption and glorification for His saints of our race ; His action for and in " the blessed company of all faithful people." The thought is one to stimulate the feeblest and most solitary Christian ; while yet its chief concern is with the aggregate, the community, in which the grace which works freely and primarily in the individual attains its perfect harmony and speaks to the heavenly "watchers" (Dan. iv. 13, &c.) with its full significance. the manifold wisdom] Lit., "the much variegated wisdom." The adjective is stronger (by the element "much,") than that in 1 Pet. iv. 10 ("manifold grace"). It occurs only here in N.T. The reference probably is to the complicated p-oblem of man's redemption, met and solved by the "unsearchable riches" of the work of Christ. Alike as a race and as individuals, man presented difficulties innumerable to the question, how shall God be just, and the justifier, and sanctifier, of this race? But every difficulty was, and is, met in "Christ, the Wisdom of God " ( 1 Cor. i. 24, 30). 11. according to the eternal purpose] Lit., and better, according to the purpose of the ages. I.e. the Church, as watched by the angels, presents to them the final result (final in kind) of the great Plan of Divine developments by which the glory of God was to be displayed in His dealings with Sin. The redeemed Church corresponds to this Plan; it is (in kind, in essence,) the realization ofthe Divine Idea. No other w. 12, 13.] EPHESIANS, III. 93 Lord: in whom we have boldness and access with confidence ¦» by the faith of him. Wherefore I desire that ye faint not at 13 and better thing in that kind is to succeed it. The past "ages," angelic, paradisaic, patriarchal, Mosaic, prophetic, have led up to the Universal Church, in its spiritual reality, as their goal. in Christ Jesus our Lord] Lit., In the Christ, Jesus our Lord. — The "Purpose" was "purposed" (lit. "made") "in Him," inasmuch as both Idea and Working were altogether bound up with Him. "In Christ" God was to "reconcile the world"; "in Christ" the saints were to "have redemption in His blood"; "in Him" to be "rooted and built up"; "complete in Him"; "abiding in Him"; "walking in Him"; "dying in Him" (Rev. xiv. 13); "made alive in Him" (1 Cor. xv. 22). Thus "in the Christ," the Eternal and Anointed Son and Word, the Idea stood forth formed ; and in that Christ, as "Jesus our Lord," incarnate, sacrificed, glorified, the Idea is carried into realization. 12. in whom we have] Here (see last note) is the realization. It was "purposed in Him" that we His saints should be unspeakably near to the Father ; and so we now are, and angels see it. boldness] Lit., the (or our) freedom of speech, the boldness of intimate intercourse. Here and there (perhaps Col. ii. 15, where A.V. "openly"; Heb. x. 35; 1 Joh. ii. 28; where A.V. "con fidence") the original word seems to lose its special reference to speech; but certainly not here. The saint (Heb. iv. 16) "comes with free utterance to the throne of grace " ; to speak a child's every thought, desire, and fear. — On the definite article here ("the boldness") Monod remarks that it indicates "une hardiesse Men connue", a familiar characteristic of experience. access] Better, introduction; see on ii. 18. with confidence] Lit., and better, in. This holy confidence with God is illustrated often in the Acts, and in the Epistles. Meyer refers to Rom. viii. 38 &c. Still more in point is the passage just following this, and St Paul's other prayers for his converts. by the faith of him] So lit. , but the better English equivalent for the Greek is (R. V.) through our faith in Him. The same con struction with the same meaning occurs Mar. xi. 22 ("have faith of God"); Rom. iii. 22 ; Gal. ii. 16, 20; Phil. iii. 9. See too Col. ii. 12 (" faith ofthe operation of God"). Observe the persistent recurrence of the idea of faith. The entrance into one-ness with Christ is, on our side, by faith (ii. 8), and (here) the life lived in that sacred one-ness is realized in the exercise of faith. 13. Wherefore] In view of the facts just recited; the welcome of Gentile believers into the true Israel, the Body of Christ, "accord ing to the purpose of the ages," for the instruction of holy angels, and for the saints' own joy in intimacy with the Father. In the propagation of such a Gospel the messenger might well be willing to suffer for the sake of the converts ; and they in their turn might well not be discouraged when they saw him suffer for them. These suffer- 94 EPHESIANS, III. [v. 14. 14 my tribulations for you, which is your glory. For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, ings, far from indicating defeat or failure, were " their glory," proofs that their Lord thought their incorporation into Himself worth the severest conflicts and sorrows of an Apostle. Yet the intense com munity of love between converts and Apostle might still tempt them to depression ; and hence this request, so generous and tender. / desire] I.e. probably, "I desire you; I ask as a boon from you." It is possible to explain the words of a prayer to God; but the Gr. construction does not favour this, and the much . stronger phrase for prayer in the next verse is also against it. See further just below. faint] The same word as that e.g. Luke xviii. 1 ; 2 Cor. iv. 16. The idea is relaxation and cessation of effort under weariness or pain. It is possible to explain this clause (as R.V. margin) "that /faint not " ; for the pronoun is not expressed. (In that case we should also, of course, explain "I desire," just above, of prayer to God.) But against this view lie the thoughts that the words, "which is your glory," would thus lose point, and, even more, that such a prayer would be a discord in a passage so full of exultation and love, while the received explanation forms on the contrary a rich and true concord in it. your glory] See last note but two. 14 — 19. The main theme resumed : prayer for the In dwelling of Christ. 14. For this cause] The same phrase as that of ver. 1 . See note there. Here the broken connexion is resumed. The "permanent habita tion of God " (ii. 22) is still in the Apostle's mind, but in another aspect. The thought of the eternal totality, the Church glorified, gives place in a measure to that of the present individuality, the saint's experience now and here of the consciously welcomed "permanent habitation of Christ in the heart," with all its spiritual concomitants. The two aspects are complements of each other. Each "living Stone" (1 Pet. ii. 5) is, as it were, a miniature of the living Temple. In each of them, as if it were an integral microcosm, yet with a view not to itself only but to the final harmony of the whole, Christ works, manifests Himself, and dwells. So, as by the primary and most vital condition, is approached that ' ' far-off divine Event, to which the whole creation moves, x (and the New Creation most directly of all,) and with which the close of ch. ii. has dealt. Meanwhile this prospect, and the present community of the saints, is not absent from this passage, in which we have the great "Family" (ver. 15), and "all the saints" (ver. 18); in which plurals are used throughout; and in which the closing sentences (vv. 20, 21) point by the vastness of their language to a more than individual sphere of realization. I bow my knees] The attitude of prayer, Luke xxii. 41 ; Acts vii. 60, ix. 40, xx. 36, xxi. 5. See too Rom. xiv. 1 1 ; Phil. ii. 10. The words, doubtless, do not impose a special bodily posture as a necessity in spiritual worship; physical conditions may make kneeling impossible, ' In Memoriam, at the end. v. 15.] EPHESIANS, III. 95 of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named, 13 or undesirable, on occasion. But they do impose the spiritual attitude of which the bodily is type and expression ; profound and submissive reverence, perfectly harmonious with the "boldness" and "confidence" of ver. 1 2. And so far as body and spirit work in concord, this recom mends the corresponding bodily attitude where there is no distinct reason against it. the Father] The words, "of our Lord Jesus Christ," are to be omitted. They appear in very ancient documents, including the Syriac and Latin versions. But the great Latin Father and critic, St Jerome (cent. 4 — 5), in his comment on this verse, expressly says that the "Latin copies" are in error; and the evidence of both Greek MSS. and patristic quotations preponderates for the omission. 15. of whom... is named] Lit., " out of Whom, &c." The derivation ofthe "name" is from His Fatherhood. the whole family] Gr., patria. It is difficult to preserve in English the point ofthe Gr. here. "Father" and "family" have no verbal kinship, while pat$r and patria have. "The whole fatherhood," or "every fatherhood," would scarcely convey a clear idea. An interesting question of interpretation arises here. The Revisers render "every family," or (margin) "every fatherhood" ; and in this they have the concurrence of many commentators, modern and ancient. Indeed, there could be no doubt of their rendering were the usages of Greek in the N. T. and in the classics the same; the absence here of the article before patria would be decisive in Xenophon, for example. But the law of the Gr. article is in some respects less precise in the N.T., as was observed on ii. 21 (where see note); and we are at liberty here, as there, though of course with caution, to take the context into account, before surrendering the A. V. The alternatives then are, (1) to understand the Apostle to diverge to the thought that God's spiritual Fatherhood is the Archetype of all family unions, in earth and heaven ; the source from which every other "father" draws his "name," his title and idea; (2) to understand the Apostle to dwell on the thought of the oneness of the family union of saints and angels under the Eternal Father of Spirits Who gives "name," - designation as His children, to the whole company. We feel the difficulty of the question. And we are willing to own that there may be communities in the heavenly world to which the idea of family may attach. But if so this is the solitary hint of it in Scripture. And meanwhile the context as a whole seems to us to plead strongly for the idea of oneness as against particularity. And the phrase "in heaven and earth," compared with i. 10 (where carefully observe the connexion), suggests to us far rather the idea ofthe Great Family "gathered up" in Christ than the extraneous and new idea of many families, connected or not connected with Him. We plead accordingly for the A. V. And we thus see presented in the passage the great truth, so character istic of the whole Epistle — the spiritual oneness of the holy Com munity. 96 EPHESIANS, III. [v. 16. is that he would grant you, according to the riches of his glory, to be strengthened with might by his Spirit in the inner It is worth observing that the word " family" was used by the Rabbis in a sense somewhat akin to the sense (thus explained) of this passage. With them "the upper family" and "the lower family" meant, respect ively, the Angels and Israel. Wetstein here quotes a Rabbinic comment on Jer. xxx. 6: — "All faces; even the faces of the upper and lower family; of the angels and of Israel." And again; "God does nothing without counsel taken with His upper family." This is not a perfect parallel here, where, as we take it, the idea is strictly of one united brotherhood; but it is near enough to have had, possibly, a share in moulding the phrase here. — The suggestion to translate the Greek, " the whole family in heaven, and that on earth," oversteps, we think, the limits of the grammar. 16. according to the riches of his glory] I. e., as He can do Who is Lord of the resources of an Eternal Nature and Heavenly Kingdom. (See on i. 18 for the phrase "riches of glory" in another reference.) The glory of God is, in brief, Himself, as the Infinite and Holy One, with all results, for Himself and His creatures, of His being such. to be strengthened] The Gr. verb is elsewhere used with ideas of spiritual firmness and vigour (Luke i. 8o, ii. 40; 1 Cor. xvi. 13). So it is here. The saints are to be so strengthened as not to fear things of which nature is afraid ; even the felt indwelling of the Holy One, and His absolute dominion in the inmost heart. with might] The power of God. by his Spirit] The Holy Ghost ; everywhere present in the doctrine of this Epistle. He is so to deal with "the inner man" as that the presence of Christ shall be permanent in the heart. Cp. Rom. viii. 9, 10, where observe the transition from, "the Spirit of God dwelleth in you", to, "Christ is in you." And see, too, the Lord's words, Joh. xiv. 16, 18, 21, 23, xvi. 7, xvii. 11. There we find that while He is "no more in the world," and it is "expedient that He go away," yet "the Spirit of Truth" shall not only come, but so come that the disciples shall not be "left orphans"; their Lord shall "come to them"; His Father and He will "make Their abode" with each faithful believer. We thus get fragments of a Divine comment on the glorious passage now before us; to the effect that this Presence, this permanent Indwelling, of the Saviour, is essentially a Presence in and by the Spirit, mediated by the Spirit; not physical, or quasi-physical, or under any mode other than, and different from, a Presence through the Spirit's agency upon the "inner man." Where the Spirit "permanently abides," there, and therefore, does the Saviour so abide; with just this difference, or con dition, that we are to think, in the passage before us, of the indwelling Spirit as directing His agency expressly and specially in the direction of making the Saviour's Presence a permanent reality to the "heart." Compare further the Seven Epistles of the Revelation, where the voice of the glorified Saviour is identified, in every instance, with that of the Spirit. v. I7-] EPHESIANS, III. 97 man ; that Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith ; that 17 in the inner man] Lit., "into the inner man"; as if to say, "deep in it"; "penetrating far into it." — " The inner man" : — see for the same phrase, Rom. vii. 22; 2 Cor. iv. 16. Here it means, practically, the regenerate human spirit. In itself, the phrase may mean no more than the invisible as against the material in man; but the three N. T. passages thus before us indicate its actual reference, in St Paul's voca bulary, to the regenerate self. 17. that Christ may dwell] This clause is in close connexion with the preceding. The " strengthening" is the requisite to the "dwelling" ; the "dwelling" the sure sequel to the "strengthening." See last note but one. ' "Christ": — Mt." the Christ," as so often in this Epistle (i. 10, 12, 20, ii. 5, 13, iii. 4, 8, 11, iv. 7, 12, 13, 20, v. 2, 5, 14, 23, 25, vi. 5; besides uncertain readings). — Not to press distinctions too far, we may yet point out that the Lord is here presented not specially as Jesus, but as the Messiah, in His anointed majesty as the Prophet, Priest, and King of His saints. The thought of His Presence includes that of our ten- derest affections towards Him, but rises also above it. It is the Presence of the Supreme Teacher, Redeemer, and Possessor. "dwell ': — the Gr. verb indicates permanent abode. It is akin to the noun, ii. 22 ; where see note. See it used 2 Pet. iii. 13, of the eternal presence of Righteousness in the New Universe. It marks a residence quite different from transient or casual lodgment. The tense is the aorist (infinitive), and the idea of the aorist is single ness of act. Accordingly, the Lord is viewed here as not merely "dwelling," but, in a definite act, "coming to dwell," "taking up abode." The question arises, did the Apostle contemplate the Ephe sians as all alike devoid of the Indwelling in question, and needing it to begin? It is difficult to grant this, in an Epistle addressed to a large community, and one evidently rich in life and love. Well-nigh every stage of spiritual development must have been represented there. Yet the aorist must have its meaning. And surely the account of it is this, that the Apostle views them each and all as ever needing, at whatever stage of spiritual life, such an access of realization and reception as should be, to what had preceded, a new Arrival and Entrance of Christ in the heart. Local images are always elastic in the spiritual sphere ; and there is no contradiction thus in the thought of the permanent presence of One who is yet needed to arrive. On the other hand there are possible stages of Christian experience in which, practically, the Lord's "coming in to dwell," as here, would be a thing wholly new; and many such cases, doubtless, were found at Ephesus. Not only here but throughout the N.T. the saint is viewed as meant to enjoy a prevailing, not an intermittent, intercourse with his Lord in faith and love; an habitual "access," "confidence," "peace and joy in believing," and "fruit-bearing" power. Where such enjoy ment does not as yet exist there is still lacking that which is in view here. True, it will be only a crude analysis that will claim to discern ephesians 7 98 EPHESIANS, III. [v. 18. «8ye, being rooted and grounded in love, may be able to and decide peremptorily in such spiritual problems. But this does not alter the facts and principles of the matter in themselves. in your hearts] A phrase important for the interpretation of the clause. It shews that the Indwelling, here is subjective rather than objective ; an Indwelling conditioned by the saint's realization. " Christ " is " in" every genuine disciple (2 Cor. xiii. 5), in the sense ofthe disciple's covenant and vital union with Him (1 Cor. vi. 15, 17). But this was certainly the case already with the Ephesian saints. Here then we have to do not so much with fact as with grasp on fact ; the reception of the (already vitally present) Lord in habitual realization by the con science, understanding, imagination, affections, and will. For the "heart" in Scripture is the "seat" of all these: see e.g. Gen. xx. 5; Deut. iv. 39; Isa. vi. 10; Mar. xi. 23; Luke xxi. 14; Acts xi. 23; Rom. v. 5; 1 Cor. ii. 9; Jas. i. 26; 1 Joh. iii. 20. See oni. 18. — "Though all of us isa temple for Him, yet the heart is the choir, where He properly sitteth" (Bayne (cent. 17), On the Ephesians). by faith] That is, trustful acceptance; holy and humble reliance upon Divine promises, such promises as those of Joh. xiv. 21, 23; Rev. iii. 20. Observe that the Indwelling here in view is to be effectuated by means of spiritual action (God-given, as this passage has shewn, but not the less personal) on the saint's part. And observe that it is not aspi ration, but faith, that is the action. Aspiration will certainly be present, as an essential condition; there must be conscious desire. But it is faith, submissive trust in the Promiser, which is alone the effectuating and maintaining act. Lit., "through the faith":— i.e., perhaps, "by means of your faith," faith as exercised by you; but the article must not be pressed in translation, where an abstract principle is the noun. — "The faith " in the sense of the Christian creed is manifestly not in place here, where the context is full ofthe idea ofthe actions of grace in the soul. that ye] Here appears the holy purpose of the experience just described. The Indwelling is to be specially in order lo the attitude and the knowledge now to follow. being rooted and grounded in love] "In love" is highly emphatic by position in the Gr. — Does it mean the love of God for us, or ours for God? Perhaps it is needless to seek a precise answer. "Love, generally'- (Alford), is to be the region of this great experience of the soul; a sphere of which the Divine Love and the regenerate spirit's response are, as it were, the hemispheres. But we may at least suggest, with i. 4 in mind (see note there), that the Divine Love is mainly in view. Is it quite intelligible to regard the saint's love as the soil and basis of his saintship? For observe it is the saints themselves not this or that in them ("ye being rooted, &c"), that the Love in question thus sustains and feeds. The chain of thought will thus be : "I pray that your hearts may so receive Christ as their perpetual Indweller, that you may, in this profound intimacy with Him, see and grasp your acceptance and life in the Eternal Love, manifested through Him." v. 18.] EPHESIANS, III. 99 comprehend with all saints what is the breadth, and length, "rooted and grounded"; — perfect participles. The second, lit. found-. ed, recurs to the imagery of the Temple and its basis; ch. ii. The first, giving a metaphor much rarer with St Paul (Col. ii. 7 is the only close parallel), suggests the additional idea of derived life and its development. The saints are viewed both as "trees of the Lord, full of sap," deep in the rich soil of the Love of God (cp. Psal. i. 3, xcii. 12, 13; Jer. xvii. 8), and as constituent stones of the great Temple which rests ultimately on the same Love. — Col. ii. 7, just quoted, gives the same collocation of ideas, but with differences. The participle there rendered "built up" is present; "being builded upon." And "in Him" takes the place of "in love." This latter difference is no discrepancy; "the love of God is in Jesus Christ our Lord " (Rom. viii. 39). Such, as to root and basis, is the true saint's position. It is not created, but realized, when the experience of ver. 17 takes place in him. And the following clauses dilate on the spiritual use which he is to make of it. 1§. may be able] R. V, may be strong; more lit. still, may get strength ; the verb being aorist, pointing to a new crisis. The idea is of a wide grasp, a mighty stretch of thought and faith, only to be made by spirits perfectly assured (ver. 17) of their footing. to comprehend] R. V., "apprehend" ; a minute and over-careful change. — The Gr. is used (e.g. Acts iv. 13, x. 34, xxv. 25) of mental perception, or ascertainment. with all saints] Lit., with all the saints. For the phrase cp. i. 15, vi. 18; Col. i. 4 ; 1 Thess. iii. 13; Philem. 5; Rev. viii. 3, and perhaps xxii. 21. On the word "saint" see note on i. 1. — The thought empha sized here is that of the great Community. The Apostle has spoken of experiences possible only in the sanctum of the individual regenerate "heart," but he reminds the reader here that these are never to terminate in themselves. The individual, as he is never other than a "member" of Christ, is never other than a "member" of his brethren (see Rom. xii. 5). His grace and light are to be, as it were, contri butions to the combined experience of the true Church, as the grace and light of the true Church are to enhance his own. what is the breadth, &c] The Object is left unnamed. What is it? We explain it, with Monod, as the Divine Love, which has just been named (see last on ver. 17), and is to be named (as the Love of Christ) immediately again. At least, it is that Work, Purpose, Cove nant, of God in Christ which is ultimately resolved into the Eternal and Sovereign Love. The imagery is perhaps suggested by a vastly spacious building, with its high towers and deep foundations. But may it not rather be suggested by the visible Universe itself, as if a spectator gazed from horizon to horizon, and at the boundless air above, and thought of the depths beneath his feet? We may partially illustrate the language, in any case, by such passages as Psalm ciii. n, 12. EPHESIANS, III. [v. 19. i9 and depth, and height ; and to know the love of Christ, which passeth knowledge, that ye might, be filled with all Some curiosities of interpretation attach to this verse. Severianus (cent. 4, 5), quoted by Alford, finds here an allusion to the shape of the Cross, and in it to the Lord's Godhead ("height") and Manhood ("depth"), and to the extent of the apostolic missions ("length and breadth"). St Jerome (cent. 4, 5) in his Commentary here interprets the words at some length, and finds in the "height" the holy angels, in the "depth" the evil spirits, in the "length" those of mankind who are on the upward path, and in the " breadth " those who are "sinking towards vices. For broad and ample is the way which leadeth to death." The Calvinist Zanchius (cent. 16) adopts from Photius (cent. 9) the explanation that the reference is to " ihe mystery of the free salvation through Christ of the Gentiles and the whole human race"; called long, because decreed from eternity; broad, because extended to all; deep, because of the descent of Christ to Hades, and because of the resurrection of the dead; high, because Christ ascended above all heavens. (Quoted in Poole's Synopsis Criticorum.) 19. And to know] An aorist verb, expressing * new and decisive development of knowledge, knowledge of the spiritual kind, the intuition of the regenerate spirit, realized in its own responsive adoring love. the love of Christ] Who "loved the Church, and gave Himself for it" (v. 25); "Who loved me, and gave Himself for me" (Gal. ii. 20). See further Rom. viii. 35, with 39; 2 Cor. v. 14; Rev. i. 5. — The con text favours the chief reference here of these sacred words to the Lord's love for the true Church, without excluding, what cannot be excluded in the matter, His love, and the sense of it, for the individual saint. which passeth knowledge] knowledge of every sort, spiritual as much as intellectual. Here is an Object eternally transcending, while it eternally invites, the effort after a complete cognition. For ever, there is more to know. — To find a reference here to heretical or unspiritual gndsis is frigid and out of place, in a passage glowing with the highest truths in their loveliest aspects. — For a similar phrase, cp. Phil. iv. 7. The testimony of such words as these to the Nature of Christ is strong indeed, none the less so because not on the surface. No created Person, however exalted, could either be, or be commended as being, to the human spirit, an infinite object of knowledge in any aspect. — "None fully knoweth the Son save the Father" (Matt. xi. 27). that ye might be filled] An aorist again; indicating a crisis and new attainment. For the thought, cp. Col. i. 9; "that ye may be filled with the knowledge of His will"; such knowledge as to lead to "walk ing worthy of the Lord unto all pleasing." See too, for kindred language, Rom. xv. 13, 14. The idea is of a vessel connected with an abundant source external to itself, and which will be filled, up to its capacity, if the connexion is complete. The vessel is the Church, and also the saint. It may be only partially filled ; it may be full — every faculty of the individual, every part of life and circumstances, every member of the community, "yW-filled with grace and heavenly vv. 20, 21.] EPHESIANS, III. 101 the fulness of God. Now unto him that is able to do ex- » ceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think, accord ing to the power that worketh in us, unto him be glory in 21 benediction." And this latter state is what the Apostle looks for. See further, on ver. 18. with] Lit., and better, unto, "up to." The "fulfilling" is to be limited only by the Divine resources. Not, of course, that either Church or soul can contain the Infinite; but they can receive the whole, the plenitude, of those blessings which the Infinite One is willing and able at each moment to bestow on the finite recipient. all the fulness of God] I.e., as in Col. ii. 9 (and see note on i. 23), the totality of the Divine riches, whether viewed as Attributes as in God, or Graces as in us; whatever, being in Him, is spiritually communicable to the saints, the "partakers of Divine nature" (2 Pet. i. 4). The believing reader will find inexhaustible matter in such a phrase for thought, prayer, and faith1. 20, 21. Ascription of praise, closing a main section of the Epistle. 20. Now unto him] The Father, in Whose "glory" all things ter minate. As it is of His essence to demand praise, so it is of the essence of regenerate life to yield it to Him. that is able] For this phrase in doxology cp. Acts xx. 32 ; Rom. xvi. 25; Jude 2+. Faith both rests and is reinvigorated in the assurance, and re-assurance, of the Divine Ability, wholly objective to the believer. Cp. Matt. xix. 26; Rom. iv. 21, xi. 23, xiv. 4; 2 Cor. ix. 8 (a good parallel here) ; Phil. iii. 21; 2 Tim. i. 2 ; Heb. vii. 25. (In the three last passages the reference is to the Saviour. ) exceeding abundantly] One compound word in the Greek; else where, 1 Thess. iii. 10, and (nearly identical) v. 13. Strong expressions of largeness, excess, abundance, are deeply characteristic of St Paul. all that we ask or think] The word rendered "think" means more specially understand. Cp. e.g. Matt. xv. 1 7 and above, ver. 4. So the Latin versions here; intelligimus. No narrow logic will be applied to such a clause, if we seek its true meaning. To be sure we can, if we please, "ask for," and in a certain sense "conceive of," infi nite gifts of grace ; though it is to be observed that the phrase is, not "all that we can ask" but "all that we ask." But the reader who studies the words in their own spirit will not perplex himself thus. He will see in them the assurance that his actual petitions and perceptions, guided and animated by Scripture and by grace, yet always fail to include all that He is able to do, in the range and depth of His working. according to the power, &c] The power of the indwelling Spirit. See for a remarkable parallel Col. i. 29, where the Apostle speaks of his own toils and wrestlings as "according to that working of His which 1 Observe the silent testimony of this whole paragraph against disproportioned theories of the true use of the holy Sacraments. The theme is the mode of de velopment of Divine Life in the saint, and yet no allusion is made (here or elsewhere in the Epistle) to the Holy Communion. 102 EPHESIANS, III. [v. 21. the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world with out end. Amen. worketh in me in power." There he speaks of the present and actual, here of.the possible. In the saint and in the true Church resides already a Divine force capable in itself of the mightiest developments. To attain these, not a new force, but a fuller application of this force, is required. 21. glory] Lit., and better, the glory; the glory due to the Father of the Saviour, and of the saints in Him. in the church by Christ Jesus] Lit., In Christ Jesus. "The glory" is ascribed "in Him" as the Father is manifested in Him, and "in Him reconciled the world to Himself." — But very strong evidence favours the reading In the Church and In Christ Jesus. If this is adopted, and it is nearly certain, the meaning is that the reasons of eternal praise to the Father lie both in the Church and in the Saviour ; in the Church, as chosen and glorified by Him, in the Saviour as His supreme and all- including Gift. throughout all ages, &c] Lit., unto all the generations of the age of the ages. Such is the length of prospect revealed for the Church of Christ, as the "habitation of God" (ii. 22). The meaning manifestly is, "to all eternity," whatever manifestations the eternal Future may bring. This is viewed as one vast "age" (aibn), the sum and circumference of ages, which ages again contain developments faintly imaged by the "generations" which make up the centuries of Time. — The phrases "for ever," or "for ever and ever," of our A. V., usually represent the "unto the age," or "unto the ages," or "unto the ages ofthe ages," of the Greek. The first Gr. phrase is almost confined to St John's Gospel and Epistles; the last is distinctive of the Revelation, but it occurs also in St Paul and St Peter. St Peter (2 iii. 18) writes "unto the day of the age," the "Day" which shall usher in the Eternal State. — On the word aiin see further, last note on i. 2 1 . Amen] The word is properly a Hebrew adverb ("surely"), repeat edly used as here in O. T. See Psal. lxxxix. 52 ; Jer. xi. 5 (marg. A. V.) ; &c. On the great passage thus closed Monod remarks: "This doxology, which concludes at once the Apostle's prayer and the first part of his epistle, would be remarkable anywhere, but it is doubly so here... After the grandest promises which human language can express, the Holy Spirit here closes by declaring that all which can be expressed is infinitely below the reality which is in God.. ..But nothing less could answer the vast and undefined need of the heart. All that the mind can clearly grasp and the mouth articulately utter is incapable of satisfying us. And thus this close, so astonishing and unexpected, is just what we needed... But alas, if this language which is infinitely below the reality which is in God is infinitely above the reality which is in us !...To pass from Scripture to our experience, seems like a fall from heaven to earth. ...The Lord teach us how to bring our experience into harmony with His promises." w. I, 2.] EPHESIANS, IV. 103 I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye 4 walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called, with 2 all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing Ch. IV. 1 — 16. Practical results : spiritual Unity in Diversity of Gifts. 1. I therefore] Here begins what may be called the Second Part of the Epistle. Hitherto the Apostle has dealt with the eternal and spiritual aspects of Redemption. He now comes to their sequel and manifestation in conduct and life. Not that he leaves behind, for a moment, the eternal facts and spiritual principles. Scripture always brings the doctrinal into the practical, as reason and mainspring ; and nowhere more than in this Epistle. But the main stress of thought is now on the effects rather than on the causes; it deals with the holy sequitur, the "therefore," of the matter. Compare the Epistles to the Romans and Colossians for a similar arrangement ; and, to some extent, the First to the Corinthians. the prisoner ofthe Lord] Lit., the prisoner In the Lord. His bonds are due to his union with Christ. They are thus a strong Christian argument with his converts. See further on iii. 2, above. beseech] Cp. Rom. xii. 1 for the same word in just the same connexion. The Gr. is a verb more elastic in reference than our "beseech," often meaning "to exhort," "to encourage," and (without the thought of entreaty) "to request." But the thought of entreaty is quite in place here. walk] See on ii. 2, 10, above. The distinctive notion of the word is that of the moral action and conduct of life. worthy ofthe vocation] Better, worthily of the calling. For similar phrases, cp. Phil. i. 27, "walk worthily ofthe Gospel of Christ"; Col. i. 10, "walk worthily ofthe Lord"; 1 Thess. ii. 12, "walk worthily of God." Ideally, of course, no human walk is "worthy of" the Gospel, the Call, or the Divine Caller. But practically it can and should be so, in the sense of being governed at every step by the Divine motives, applied by grace, and so presenting a true correspondence to those motives. "The vocation" :— see on i. 18, "His calling." are called] Lit., and better, were called, when they heard and be lieved. 2. wilh all lowliness] So, exactly. Acts xx. 19, in St Paul's review ofhis own "walk" at Ephesus; "serving the Lord with all lowliness." — " With": — the idea is strictly of accompaniment, attendance. But in view of actual N. T. usage of the preposition this must not be pressed. Lowliness was to characterize them. Observe the moral lesson here. The first and most characteristic effect of the heights and depths of Divine privilege and spiritual experi-\ ence just unfolded is to be the sincerest and most unselfish humility. lowliness] The Gr. word imports an unaffected lowly estimate of self. See Trench's Synonyms of the N. T., under •Taireivoippooiiini, 104 EPHESIANS, IV. [vv. 3, 4- 3 one another in love ; endeavouring to keep the unity of the 4 Spirit in the bond of peace. There is one body, and one Trpabri]!. It is a distinctively Christian grace, viewed as a thing always to be sought and cherished. Pagan ethics, at best, just re cognized it as right where necessary, but not as good and happy per se. The Gospel puts its obligation "and its blessedness on the same footing for all believers, as all absolutely dependent for all true good upon the mercy of Another. The corresponding adjective is used (Matt. xi. 29) by our Lord of Himself. Trench remarks that we have Him there recognizing His entire dependence as Man on the Father. Not moral defect but "crea- tureliness," he says, is the thought there. "In His human nature He must be the pattern of all...creaturely dependence." Observe the force of the phrase; "all lowliness." The grace was to have the most unreserved scope and exercise. meekness] See Trench again, as just above. The Gr. word imports gentle and entire submission under trial, whatever the trial be, in the consciousness that no other attitude can be right for self. Meekness thus rests "on deeper foundations than its own, namely on those which lowliness has laid for it, and it can only continue while it continues to rest on these." In this respect " it is a grace in advance of lowliness " (Trench). longsuffering] Grouped with "meekness," Gal. v. 22; Col. iii. 12. It so far differs from it as not necessarily to import the patience or sub mission due to a sense that a chastisement is right, but rather patience for whatever good reason; e.g. largeness of view of things, or deep internal peace and joy. — It is used of the Divine patience, Rom. ii. 4 ; ix. 22; 1 Tim. i. 16; 1 Pet. iii. 20; 2 Pet. iii. 15. forbearing one another in love] Here was to be the special motive to "longsuffering," the family-affection of fellow-members of Christ. It is implied that there were sure to be occasions for such forbearance. Cp. Col. iii. 13. 3. endeavouring] R. V., better, giving diligence. The A. V., to a modern reader, suggests (as the Gr. does not) a certain imperfection and precariousness of result. the unity ofthe Spirit] The sacred Oneness effected and maintained by the One Holy Spirit who had, by uniting them to Christ, united them to each other. This Oneness has many aspects. The aspect here is that of realized community of feeling and purpose, based on the fact of community of regenerated position and nature in Christ. in the bond of peace] Grammatically, this may mean either "in peace, as the bond ; or "in that which secures peace." Bengel prefers the latter; "the bond, with which peace is bound, is even love." But we have recently (ch. ii.) had Christ Himself presented as the "peace" of His people one with another; and is not the same thought present here? To realize their connexion with Him as such was the way to maintain the sense and exercise of spiritual solidarity. 4. one body] See on i. 23; ii. 15, 16; and below, ver. 15, 16. Here as always the imagery of the Body suggests not only union but w. S, 6.] EPHESIANS, IV. 105 Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling ; one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of 6 united energy and operation.— Its frequent recurrence emphasizes its importance and significance. Vital union with Christ, by the Spirit, is the one true secret of holy growth and action, alike for the individual and the community. — The "one" is highly emphatic. As regards the vital Union, there is one Organism, and one only. Let the relations of practical Christian life and work correspond to that fact, to the utmost possible. one Spirit] The same Divine Spirit as above, ver. 3. He, the imme diate Agent in regeneration (Joh. iii.), unites each regenerate individual to the Head, and, as the Sanctifier, maintains that union. He is thus comparable to the all-pervading spirit energizing and preserving the human frame. Bengel remarks on the close sequence, in the "Apostles' Creed," of the articles of the Holy Ghost and of the Holy Church. Cp. at large 1 Cor. xii. ye are called] Perhaps a special reference to the work of the \, Holy Ghost, the immediate Agent in the "call " of grace. Cp. i Cor. xii. 13. — Lit. and better, ye were called. in one hope of your calling] On the " hope " and the "calling," see on i. 18. They were called " in" the hope; i.e., so as to be in it, embraced and possessed by it. — On the spiritual power of the "one hope " cp. Col. i. 4, for » real parallel. There, the "love for all the saints" is (lit.) "on account of the hope laid up in heaven." The community of blissful prospect binds faster the communion of sympathy and affection. 6. one Lord] Jesus Christ; Possessor and Prince of all His people equally. one faith] Is "faith" here the "Christian creed," or "trustful acceptance" of Christ, "saving faith"? Probably the latter, in view of the great rarity of the former meaning of the word in St Paul (Gal. i. 23 ; Phil. i. 27 ; present perhaps the best cases, and even these are not quite clear). The words here thus mean, " one and the same way of access to and union with the One Lord." one baptism] The one Divine Seal upon the one God-given faith in the One Lord. This holy Seal is "one " in respect of the Unity of the Triune Name (Matt, xxviii. 19) " into '' which, and which alone, all partakers of the covenant of Christ are baptized. The "one bap tism for the remission of sins " is baptism into that Name, or into its equivalent (Acts ii. 38), the Name of the Son of the Father and the Giver of the Spirit. 6. one God and Father of all] The ultimate Source of spiritual unity. Baptism seals faith, faith unites to the Lord Christ, Christ reveals the Father as "the only true God" (Joh. xvii. 3), with Whom He, one with His Church, is eternally one.— " Of all":— here, ob viously, all believers. Other aspects of Divine Fatherhood are not here in question. See above on i. 2. And cp. on this ver. 1 Cor. viii. 6. 'J*5 EPHESIANS, IV. [vv. ^ & 7 all who is above all, and through all, and irTyou all. ~Brit 8 ™ ° evell Te °/ US is Siven Srace according to the Z Z" °H ^ g,ft °f ?hrist Wherefore A, saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, above all &c] The thought in these clauses progresses downwards and inwards. The Eternal Father, in His Son, supremely presides W 7 n „• ^nerate children, carries out action "through " them and dwells in them. On the last word see ii. 22 ; 2 Cor. vi. \ 6- ,8^ Joh of' ' ^an"~nin ./^ a//"''-7therVs clear evidence for the °™i^ion ot you , considerable evidence for the reading "us"; but « nre- ponderance, chiefly of patristic quotations, against any pronoun. The context however is clear for the special reference to the Church The pTerforac1i™riaanneunion0f ^ " ^ ^^ ^ »<= ^ ' ~ 4, ac. ; ¦ fet. iv. 10, 11. Harmony of spiritual life and work should be promoted by equal remembrance of the oneness of the source of hfe and the inevitable diversity of its exercises and applications eZS-^ T'J'T1 in the great ideal distributfon a the Lord's exaltation, and actually when we were each "sealed " (i iA according to the measure of the gift of Christi I e nnr inrfpfinff.i mr:xlGi*ivhe ***&£- c^t/adiu^^s Mis mlghty Gift to His sovereign allotment of each servant's work .^^0-^7' ** **' ^ a1' ^ ^°^ *^™^ 8. Wherefore he jasVA] Or It, i.e. the Scripture saith St P„„l>0 SSSX-SSftT^ vtf ^niifth «e(^ facf jrTstlC"6 SCnPtUre Stat6ment °/ ~ ™ to ^ritual ther?f:,£^?dS ascena ^nU^tSttad^t^ bTtne Apostle" bnefly "^ °D the USe made °f thetal^fswori: make th^He^ ^^^.^^^^'^T *? the "taking" was for the purposed "Sng"f The ^que^ v. 9-] EPHESIANS, IV. 107 and gave gifts unto men. (Now that he ascended, what 9 is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts Divine or human, in Ps. lxviii. may well be conceived as receiving grants for distribution among his vassals. If so, the Targum (see above) and the Apostle rightly convey the intention of the Psalmist. "Among men"; "for men." The great compression of Hebrew poetical diction makes it quite possible to explain, "so as to be among men." Thus again "to," or "for," will rightly convey the intention of the Psalmist, whatever were his precise and conscious thought in depicting the Conqueror as making gifts and grants to "man." |8. The "first reference" of Psal. lxviii. is a large and difficult question. See Dean Perowne's full statement of problems and theories in his Commentary on the Psalms ; see too Dr Kay's notes. It is enough here to say that the Psalm celebrates, apparently, some great sacred triumph, or triumphs, at the Sanctuary of Zion; an occasion on which the supreme Conqueror, Jehovah, is represented as " ascending" after battle to His throne. One type of criticism will see in this nothing beyond a national Ode of Victory, and will regard the Apostle's quotation as an "unscientific" accommodation. For ourselves, be lieving that our Lord taught a very different view of the Ancient Scrip tures, we feel free to recognize any "first reference" fairly provable, but also-bound to believe that the Divine Author worked through the human author, so as to convey eternal and permanent truth through his imagery and words, and so as to make the whole terminate on Christ, whether or no the human author was aware of it. And we believe that the same Divine Author worked here through the memory and thought of the Apostle, so as to secure, in his quotation and exposition, the true development of the Divine intention of the earlier passage. We thus accept the present verse as reciting a true testimony of the Spirit of Prophecy to the foreseen facts of the Ascension of the Divine Messiah after conflict and conquest, and the distribution of blessings consequent upon it. The "captivity " will denote whatever persons or powers are in any way His conquest; whether as "enemies under His feet " (1 Cor. xv. 25, &c), or1 self-surrendered rebels reconciled to His will (2 Cor. x. 3 — 5, &c). — For the thought, "He received gifts (to distribute) amongst men," cp. Acts ii. 33. 9. Ntrw that he ascended] More lit., Now the [word, or thought,] He ascended. what is it] As if to say, "What does it imply? It implies a previous descent, from the seat of royalty. And, in the light of the Fulfilment, this implied descent was 'to the lower parts of the earth.'" The Apostle does not mean that the Psalm teaches anything special about the Descent, but that it implies a Descent, and that what that Descent was, Christians know. And the interest of the implied reference is, its supernatural correspondence in outline to Gospel facts; its imagery- being of One who has left His throne and now returns upward. first] Evidence is divided as to the right of this word to a place in the text. It is obviously, at worst, explanatory of the sense. 108 EPHESIANS, IV. [v. 10. . of the earth ? He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all the lower parts of the earth] Does this mean " the lower regions, even the earth," as distinct from heaven? Or, " the lower regions of the earth," i.e. the region underground, the grave and its world? Our great theologian and critical scholar, Bp Pearson (Exposition of the Creed, Art. V.), inclines to the former view, with a reference to the Incarnation only. The phrase, so taken, may perhaps be illustrated by Isai. xliv. 23 ; where, however, "lower parts of the earth" (LXX. "foun dations of the earth") maybe contrasted with "mountains." (Cp.also, perhaps, Psal. cxxxix. 15.) On the other hand Psal. lxiii.9 is distinctly in favour of a reference to " the grave." Our judgment is on the whole for the second view, with a reference to the Death and Burial of the Incarnate Lord. Such a reference seems better to balance, in a sense, the phrase just below, "far above all heavens"; it falls in better with the amplitude of the words, " that He might fill all things" (cp. Rom. xiv. fand it is in the manner of the N. T. to connect the Resurrection and ension as parts of one great whole. And the Lord's Death is so bundly concerned with the procurement of blessings to His Church an allusion to it is ti priori likely here. — Many of the Fathers (see rson's notes under Art. V. of the Creed) take this passage to refer to a definite work done by the Lord in the under-world, a deliverance of the spirits of the Old Testament saints from a "Limbus" there. But cer tainly the words here teach nothing of the kind ; only that He who suffered for us entered the state of disembodied souls, "the Grave," "Sheol," "Hades." The mysterious passage 1 Pet. iii. 18, 19, will at once occur in the question. But upon it we can only say here that it is too isolated, and involves too many problems of interpretation, to allow any great and peculiar article of belief to be built upon it; and, upon any view, its only explicit reference is to the generation of the Flood. See again Pearson. And for a different view from his, stated with great ability and insight, see Note II. to The Unsafe Anchor, by the Rev. C. F. Childe. 10. He that descended, &c] As if to say, "Yes, He once descended, as a step in the process, a means to the great end ; but now we have to dwell on the result ; this Descender has now become by consequence the Ascended One, giving gifts from the Throne." Both parts ofthe statement are emphatic, the fact and wonder of the Descent, and the triumph and result of the Ascent ; and they are in deep connexion. But the main stress is on the latter. far above all heavens] Lit., all the heavens. Cp. Heb. iv. 14; vii. 26; where the ascended High Priest is revealed as "having passed through the heavens," and as " become loftier than the heavens." — Scrip ture gives no precise revelation as to the number or order of regions or spheres of the upper world, the unseen universe of life and bliss. But its frequent use of the plural in regard of it, as here, whatever the origin of the usage, sanctions the thought that the Blessed (angels and glorified men), while from other points of view eternally concentrated1 v. II.] EPHESIANS, IV. 109 things.) And he gave some, apostles ; and some, prophets ; " and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; and in company, and doubtless able, under their spiritual conditions of existence, to realize and act upon their unity to a degree unimagined by us, are yet distributed, classed, and ordered. "The Rabbis spoke of two heavens, or seven" (Smith's Diet, of the Bible, under the word Heaven; and see Wetstein on 2 Cor. xii. 2). St Paul himself speaks (2 Cor. xii. 2) of a "third heaven," meaning, apparently, the immediate presence of God; possibly with a reference to the twofold division mentioned just above, and which, if so, is to some degree favoured by Scripture. The plain meaning of the present passage, in any case, is that the Lord passed through and beyond all regions of created blessedness into the region of the Throne. That Throne (we can only use the language of figure, permitted by the Scriptures,) is as truly "far above" the highest sphere of created life as it is " far above" the lowest. To both it stands in the mysterious relation of the uncreated to the created. Cp. Psal. cxiii. 5, 6. See further above, note on i. 21. — From another point of view, He who is "far above" the heavens is (like His Father) "in heaven" (below, vi. 9). In this view, heaven in cludes the whole state of blessed existence, uncreated and created alike. that he might fill] Possibly, "fulfil"; i.e. every prophecy, of humilia tion and glory. But St Paul's usage favours the other version. He ascended that He might, not only in possibility but in act, "fill all things," " with His presence, His sovereignty, His working by the Spirit; not with His glorified body, as some have thought" (Alford). "There is here no reference to a diffused and ubiquitous corporeity, but to a pervading and energizing omnipresence. ..Christ is perfect God, and perfect and glorified Man; as the former He is present everywhere, as the latter He can be present anywhere " (Bp Ellicott). 11. And he gave] The "He" is emphatic; It was He who gave. See above on ver. 7. — Immediately, the Holy Spirit is the Giver (1 Cor. xii. 8, &c. ; cp. Acts ii. 4, and xiii. 2). But His action is in Divine union with that of the Son, and vicariously for Him. some apostles] I.e., some men as apostles, and so through the passage. Cp. 1 Cor. xii. 28. — -The gift is to the Church, from the Lord, of spiritually called and enabled human ministers. — "Apostles": — see above on i. 1. prophets] In the enumeration, 1 Cor. xii. 28, this "ministry" comes second, as here. On the "prophets" ofthe N. T. see above on ii. 20, and Appendix F. evangelists] The word occurs thrice in N.T. ; here, Acts xxi. 8, and 2 Tim. iv. 5. It seems, like our word "missionary," to indicate not a defined ecclesiastical order (for Timothy "does the work of an evangelist," while also an authoritative superintendent of pastors and churches), but rather a special kind of personal function in the ministry; the work of one called and devoted to direct proclamation of the Gospel message. It was thus an elastic word, like "missionary," sometimes and oftenest denoting a minister's special function, sometimes one only no EPHESIANS, IV. [vv. 12, 13. « for the perfecting of the saints for the work of the ministry, 13 for the edifying of the body of Christ : till we all come in of his functions. "This passage," our present passage, "would lead us to think of the evangelists as standing between the two groups," (apostles and prophets, pastors and teachers,) "sent forth, as missionary preachers of the Gospel, by the first, and as such preparing the way for the labours of the second " (Smith's Diet, of the Bible, under the word Evangelist). "The omission of evangelists in the list of 1 Cor. xii. may be explained on the hypothesis that the nature of St Paul's argu ment there led him to speak of the settled organization of a given local Church" (Ibidem). pastors and teachers] Not, "some pastors and some teachers." The two functions are regarded as coinciding and combining in the one settled guardian of a local flock; an instructive fact. — Such a "pastor- teacher" had St Paul himself been at Ephesus (Acts xx.), where indeed he had also been so conspicuously the "evangelist." — On the pastoral aspect of the Christian ministry cp. Joh. xxi. 16 (Gr. "shepherd my sheep"); Acts xx. 28 (Gr., "shepherdthe church of God"), 29; 1 Pet. v. 2, 3. See also Luke xvii. 7 (Gr., "a slave. ..shepherding"). And note the Lord's own references to His supreme Pastorate, Matt. xxv. 32, xxvi. 31 ; Joh. x. ; and Heb. xiii. 20; 1 Pet. ii. 25, v. 4; and Matt. ii. 6 (Gr., "shall shepherd my people"). On the teaching aspect of the ministry, cf. esp. Acts xiii. 1, xv. 35; Rom. xii. 7; 1 Cor. xii. 28, 29; 1 Tim. iii. 2; 2 Tim. ii. 24. 12. for the perfecting of the saints, &c] More lit., with a view to the equipment of the saints for [their] work of service. Latin versions, ad consummationem sanctorum in opus ministerii. The noun rendered equipment occurs only here in N.T. The kindred verb occurs e.g. Matt. iv. 21 (A.V., " mending nets "); Gal.vi. 1 (A.V. /'restore such a one"); Heb. xiii. 21 ("make you perfect" ; and so 2 Cor. xiii. n; : Pet. v. 10). The idea is of mending a breach, completing a con nexion, putting the dislocated in order. — The practical suggestion here is most important. The Divine gift of a Christian Ministry is to have its effect above all things in the fitting of " the saints" (true believers in general) for active "service" for the common Lord. Government, preaching, teaching, is to bear upon this. Nothing will be a more lawful result of a Divine ministerial commission than energetic efforts for Christ and His cause on the part of private Christians. These efforts, on the other hand, will never be made (in the true ideal of Christian work) in neglect or contempt of the ordered ministry. for the edifying of the body] A special aspect of the "work of ser vice" just mentioned. Each true believer is, by the spiritually enabled ministry, to be "equipped" to act as a "builder up" of the Lord's Body (on which see above, on ver. 4); to gather in new "living stones," new "members," by holy influence of word and work; and to compact and consolidate the cohesion. See below ver. 29 for a special form of such labours. — For the fusion of the metaphors of "building" and "body" see the closing verses of ch. ii., and below ver. 16. v. 13- ] EPHESIANS, IV. in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature 13. till we all come in] Render, come unto. The thought is of the holy Community converging into the spiritual harmony of a developed, equal, identical faith in and knowledge of the Son of God, under the mutual influence of individual believers stimulated and guided by the spiritual ministry. This would take place by growth and development in the faith and knowledge of individuals ; but the cohesion of the true Church would bring these individual growths to converge and result in the maturity of the collective faith and knowledge, so to speak, of the whole Body, the ideal "fullgrown Man" of which the "fullgrown men" were the elements and miniatures. of the faith, and of the knowledge of] I.e., faith in Him and knowledge a/Him. " Faith of" often, in the N.T., means "faith in"; e.g. Gal. ii. 20 (A. V., "the faith of the Son of God," identically as here). See above on iii. 12. — "Knowledge": — the Gr. word indicates true, full, developed spiritual knowledge, but too delicately, perhaps, to admit translation. See above on i. 17. the Son of God] This sacred Title belongs to the Saviour specially, among other respects, as He is the Head of the Church, the Firstborn, "in Whom" the "children" have adoption and regeneration; "in Whom " they are one with the Father. Their progress in the regenerate life and likeness will be largely effected through their "faith in Him and true knowledge of Him " as such. perfect] Better, as R.V., full-grown. The maturity of the life to come- is in view; the state in which the mutual "edification" of the present life will have done its work. man] The Gr. corresponds to the Latin vir, not homo. It indicates man as against child. See next verse. unto the measure ofthe stature] The metaphor is of height, not age, though the word rendered "stature" means "age" as readily, by itself. The imagery of growth in this passage decides the alternative here. — " The measure": — the allotted, proper, standard. the fulness of Christ] Cp. the phrases "fulness of the Gentiles" (Rom. xi. 25), and "fulness ofthe time" (Gal. iv. 4), and note on i. 23. The phrase here appears to be analogous : the total, at length attained, of what is meant by Christ. And " Christ" in this passage (so full of the idea of the oneness in and with the Lord of His mystical Body) is, in effect, Christ and His Church (see above on i. 23); as in 1 Cor. xii. 12, "as the body is one, and hath many limbs... so also is Christ." The Lord the Son becomes in accomplished fact all that He wills, and is willed, to be, only when He is the Head of a perfected mystical Body which lives by His sacred Life and is His incorporate "limbs," His immortal vehicle of action, if we may so speak. So He and they are guardedly and reverently spoken of here and there as One Christ, with full reservation, from other Scriptures, of the truth of the undying personality of each individual "limb" of the glorious Head, and of His Divine Personality. — See further above on i. 22. EPHESIANS, IV. [vv. 14, i5- ¦4 of the fulness of Christ : that we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning crafti- ¦5 ness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive ; but speaking the It is possible to explain the present phrase to mean "the fulness which flows from Christ," the full, ideal, supply of grace and glory derived to the members from the Head. But we think this less pro bable, in view of the passage above quoted, 1 Cor. xii. 12. See also below, vv. 15, 16. 14. that we henceforth, &c] This verse takes up the thought of ver. 12. The mutual activity and influence of Christians, guided aright, is to result in, at once, fixity of principle and richness of power ; both characteristic of spiritual maturity. children] The same Gr. word as e.g. 1 Cor. iii. 1 (A.V., "babes"), xiii. 11; Heb. v. 13 (A.V., "babe"). By usage, it denotes the young child in the aspect specially of ignorance or mental weakness, "child ishness." From another side the same word sometimes conveys ideas commended by the Gospel, the little child's simplicity of purpose and willingness to be taught, " childlikeness " (e.g. Matt. xi. 25, xxi. 16; 1 Cor. xiv. 20, where the kindred verb is used). tossed to and fro] Lit., "billowed"; carried up and down as on waves. Another explanation of the (rare) Gr. word is " worked into waves," as the sea by the wind. But the next phrase is against this, and so is the analogy of a verb of similar form, Jas. i. 6 (A.V., "driven with the wind"). carried about] Like St Paul's own ship in Adria (Acts xxvii. 27, where the Gr. verb is closely akin to this). of doctrine] Lit., of the teaching, the teaching in question, that described just below. by the sleight] Lit., In the dicing. — "In:"— more than "by." The thought is of "the evil atmosphere, as it were, in which the varying currents of false doctrine... exert their force" (Ellicott). — ''Dicing": — the word was familiar in later Greek, in the sense of deceit, sharp practice, in general. It was thence borrowed, and similarly used, by the Rabbis. of men] Not of Christ, nor for Christ. Cp. Gal. i. 1. and cunning craftiness, &c] More lit., In cunning, with a view to the scheming of [their] deceit. R.V., "after the wiles of error." But the Gr. preposition far more often means "with a view to" than "according to." The practical difference, however, is minute. The Apostle here recognizes and exposes the sad fact of intentional misguidance on the part of these preachers of "another Gospel" (Gal. i. 6, 7). See the parallel cautions, Rom. xvi. 17, 18; Col. ii. 4. 15. speaking the truth] The Gr. (one word) is wider and deeper, in cluding the thought of living and loving truth. Alford renders "being followers of truth." And the context is in favour of this. Not speak ing truth, but avoiding false teaching, is in question. The Christian is to cultivate an instinct for Divine Truth, as against its counterfeits, in v. 1 6.] EPHESIANS, IV. 113 truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ : from whom the whole body fitly t6 joined together and compacted by that which every joint thought and in life. — R.V., " speaking truth " and (margin) "dealing truly." in love] The holy condition under which alone the "follower of truth" would follow it truly, free from bitterness and prejudice, intent only on the will of God. It has been well said that some men find love the easier precept, some truth; but that the Gospel enjoins the harmony of both. grow up] The metaphor of the living Body reappears. See above, notes on ver. 12, 13. into him] So as to deepen the realization of "in-ness" in Him, and more richly to derive its blessings. — Just possibly we may render "unlo Him." In that case the Lord would, be viewed as the Archetype to which each believer, in his spiritual development and growth, grow- ingly conforms. But this is less in harmony with the imagery of the Body and Head which we have here. in all things] Lit., "as lo all things." Our growing sense of incor poration is to affect our whole being, not a part; "spirit, soul, and body" (1 Thess. v. 23). the head] See on i. 22. 16. from whom] He is the vital Source to which the whole com plex organism now to be described wholly owes alike its existence and its action. fitly joined together] The Gr. participle is present, and indicates a process going on. The Body, vitalized from and by the Head, is evermore acquiring a deeper and truer contact of part with part, a more harmonious ("fitly ") inner union and action. See above on ii. 21, where the same Gr. word occurs. compacted] Again a present participle. (The same word recurs Col. ii. 19.) The idea of growth in harmony of structure (see last note) here merges into that of growth in solidity and strength. by that which every joint supplieth] Lit., by or through every joint of the supply. It is possible to render "by every contact of the sup ply"; i.e., as explained by St Chrysostom here, "as the Spirit touches, in order to supply grace, each limb of the Body"; or, perhaps, as each limb, each believer, touches (by faith) the source of supply. But the parallel passage Col. ii. 19 is decisive for the explanation "joint." So the Latin Versions, junctura. The thought is of " supply " passing to the limbs through the nexus of each with the source of life. Each such nexus is thus a "joint of supply," "ajunction designed for, made lor, conveyance" of life and power; as we speak of "a bond of union." The metaphor must not be elaborately pressed. The essential idea is mutual coherence and common growth of the limbs through indi vidual connexion with the Head (1 Cor. vi. 17), not through connexion with other limbs. The "joint" thus represents the man's spiritual union with Christ, not union with church-organization, which is a ephesians 8 H4 EPHESIANS, IV. [v. 17. supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love. 17 This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity thing, however sacred, of another order. The life flow from the Head to each spiritual Limb is individual and direct. The product of this, not the cause or means of it, is the life of the Body. according to the effectual working] Better, simply, [the] working. The process in view takes place "according to," in the manner and on the scale of, the life-power of the Head acting in the Limb. The original noun (whence our "energy" is derived) occurs in N. T. only in St Paul; Eph. i. 19, iii. 7 (where see note), and here ; Phil. iii. 21; Col. i. 29, ii. 12; 2 Thess. ii. 9 (of the working of the Evil Power). The article is omitted before the word here, perhaps because the power referred to is unmistakable. Alford renders "according to vital working." in the measure of every part] Each limb has its own conditions of larger or smaller capacity; age, circumstances, training, and the like occasion very various "measures" in the allotments of the Divine life- power which adjusts itself to each real need, while it can always fully meet that need. maketh] The form of the Gr. verb (middle) indicates fulness and intensity of action. increase] Lit., the Increase, the growth contemplated as taking place. unto the edifying of itself ] For illustration, see ii. 21, and notes. in love] The inmost condition of the whole process. All takes place "in," under the power and after the action of, "love"; for the Source of the life-energy is "the Son of the Father's love" (Col. i. 13, Gr.), and the recipients are "rooted and grounded in the love" of the Father in Him (see above on iii. 17); from which "no created thing shall separate them " (Rom. viii. 39). 17 — 24. Practical Results: a spiritual revolution of principle and practice. the old man and the new. 17. testify] A word of solemn appeal occurring elsewhere in N. T. only Acts xxii. 26 (St Paul speaking) and Gal. v. 3. in the Lord] As myself being "in Him," and as to those who are in the same union. Cp. Gal. v. 10 ("I have confidence towards you in the Lord," Gr.); below, vi. 1 ("obey in the Lord"); &c. The phrase "in the Lord" occurs 45 times in St Paul; "in Christ," or closely kindred phrases, nearly 80 times. henceforth, &c] More lit., no longer walk. At their conversion "old things were passed away" (2 Cor. v. 17) as to principle. Let this be now realized, continuously and ever more completely, in practice. On the metaphor " walk" see above on ii. t, 10. v. 1 8.] EPHESIANS, IV. 115 of their mind, having the understanding darkened, being ts alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that other Gentiles] Read, probably, the Gentiles. (On the word see above, on ii. 11.) In a spiritual sense the Ephesians were no longer "Gentiles," for they were spiritual "Israelites" (Gal. vi. 16); hence the true form of the phrase here. vanity of their mind] "Vanity" here is not self-conceit, which would require another Gr. word. It is the "emptiness" of illusion, specially of the state of illusion which sees pleasure in sin. In Rom. viii. 20 the word is used of evil, whether physical or moral, regarded as (what all evil ultimately proves to be) delusion and failure. " Of their mind": — the "mind" sometimes denotes specially the reason, as distinguished e.g. from spiritual intuition (1 Cor. xiv. 14, 15). Sometimes (Col. ii. 18) it apparently denotes the rational powers in general, as in the unregenerate state; and again those powers as regenerate (Rom. xii. 2). Here the unrenewed "Gentile" is viewed as living on principles which reason can approve only when the eternal facts are hidden from it. 18. having the understanding darkened] Lit., having been dark ened in the understanding. On "the understanding" see note above on ii. 3 (where A. V., "mind "). The Gr. word may fairly be said to mean the reason (nous) in action. Here accordingly the phrase defines, so to speak, the phrase just previous ; the general illusion of the reason comes out in obfuscated acts of thought. — On the metaphor of darkness cp. Matt. vi. 23; Joh. iii. 19, viii. 12, xii. 35, 46; Acts xxvi. 18; Col. i. 13 ; 1 Thess. v. 4, 5; 1 Joh. i. 5, 6, ii. 8, 9, 11 ; and below, ch. v. 8, 11, vi. 12. It often combines the ideas of blindness and of secrecy; here it gives only the former. being alienated from the life of God] The words, Gr. and Eng., imply a fall from a state of union. See above on ii. 12 where "alien ated" occurs in another connexion. Here, as there, the Human Soul in the abstract is viewed as having shared, in its unfallen state, the Life of God, and having lost it in the Fall. And this view is transferred from the Soul to the souls in which it is individualized. Historically, we begin our personal existence aliens; ideally, we began in union and fell from it. " The life of God" : — the word " life " occurs here only in the Epistle. The phrase here denotes the spiritual force given to the human spirit by spiritual contact with God, resulting in the action and exercise of holiness. The Christian believer finds "this life in His Son" (1 Joh. v. 11). In Joh. xvii. 3 we have at once its secret and its issue; "to know the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom He hath sent." It is entered, from one point of view, by "justification of life " (Rom. v. 18), that acceptance of the guilty in Christ which is the sine qud non in Divine Law. Its development is the state of glory, which is therefore very often called, in a special sense, "eternal life" (e.g. Matt. xxv. 46), though that phrase is also fully true of the present state of the believer (1 Joh. iii. 15, v. 13). — It is plain that the 8—2 116 EPHESIANS, IV. [vv. 19, 20. 19 is in them, because of the blindness of their heart : who being past feeling have given themselves over unto lascivious- 20 ness, to work all uncleanness with greediness. But ye have word "life," in spiritual connexions, means very much more than "ex istence." See above on ii. 1. through the ignorance] Better, on account of, &c. They lost con nexion with the Life of God, and so remain, because of their ignorance of the eternal facts about God and holiness. We have here still some thing of the idealization explained just above. As the Human Soul fell through guilty "ignorance" of the supreme right and joy of absolute submission to God, so the individual soul is viewed as, ideally, losing union through the same "ignorance" of self-will. Historically, the individual begins self willed and therefore alienated ; ideally, he breaks an existing connexion. The, practical aspect of the matter is that he maintains disconnexion by the ignorance of self-will. He "wills not to come that he may have life" (Joh. v. 40), "seeing no beauty" in Christ, "that he should desire Him" in an effectual sense (Isai. liii. 2). blindness] Better, hardening (so R.V.). The word denotes failure of sensation in general. This clause is a re-statement of that just r previous. What took place "on account of ignorance" took place "on account of hardening" ; another aspect ofthe same moral state. heart] See on i. 18, iii. 17. Much more than the seat of emotion is meant by this word in Scripture. — Phrases compounded of "heart" and "harden" occur (in the Gr.) Mar. iii. 5, vi. 52, viii. 17; Joh. xii. 40. In 2 Cor. iii. 14 we have (Gr.) "their thoughts were hardened." 19. who being past feeling] The Gr. relative pronoun indicates a certain conditionality ; almost as if it were, " as being those who." But the shade is too slight for translation. — " Past feeling" : — lit., "having got over the pain," as when mortification sets in; a deeply suggestive metaphor. have given themselves over] Lit., did give over themselves. An ideal crisis is in view, reflected in many a sad actual crisis in individual lives. — " Themselves" is emphatic by position. The perverted will is the traitor, the "giver over." However deep the mystery of its per version, it is always the will, and speaks as such the decisive "yes to temptation. lasciviousness] The Gr. word occurs in N.T. 11 times. See e.g. Mar. vii. 22; Rom. xiii. 13 (A.V., "wantonness"); Gal. v. 19. The root-idea of the word is not specially fleshly impurity, but rebellion against restraint as such; petulance, wantonness, as shewn e.g. in violence. Abp Trench (N. T. Synonyms, on this word), recommends accordingly wantonness as a better rendering than "lasciviousness," which is but one manifestation of the tendency denoted. to work] Lit., to the working of. The Gr. noun occurs elsewhere in N.T. Luke xii. 58 (A.V., "diligence"); Acts xvi. 16, 19 (A.V., "gain"); xix. 24 (A.V., "gain"), 25 (A.V., "craft"). The idea of business thus adheres to the word. The suggestion conveyed by it here is that sin becomes to the deliberate sinner an earnest pursuit, an occu- v. 2i.] EPHESIANS, IV. 117 not so learned Christ; if so be that ye have heard him, and 21 pation. Cp. Rom. xiii. 14 ("forethought for the flesh"). The R.V. gives in its margin here, "to make a trade of." uncleanness] The connexion of the Gr. word is mainly with fleshly impurity, and so probably here. But itis not quite confined to this; one passage (1 Thess. ii. 3) giving the thought rather of "impure motives" in the sense of insincerity. greediness] The Gr. word is rendered "covetousness," Luke xii. 15. But it means much more than the desire of money, or property, with which we specially associate "covetousness." It occurs (or its cognate verb or adjective) in close connexion with the subject of fleshly impurity 1 Cor. v. 11 ; 1 Thess. iv. 6; and below, v. 3, 5. See too Col. iii. 5. "Greed" has a strong and terrible connexion with impurity, as is obvious. Bp Lightfoot shews (on Col. iii. 5) that the present word never of itself denotes "lust," while it is, of course, rightly used to denote the horrible grasp and plunder which lust involves. In this verse the Apostle depicts, as universal among "the Gentiles," an abandoned licentiousness. Contemporary literature gives mournful testimony to the charge, as regards society in general, indicating a large social toleration of the most hideous vices, and a significant readiness to import vicious imagery into refined spheres of thought. But the accusation of this passage, surely, transcends the limits of any one age, or state of society; it is levelled at unregenerate Man. And the expla nation of it, so viewed, is to be sought in the study of those tendencies of evil which reside in the fallen "heart" as such. The action of out rageous sinning does but illustrate the underlying principle of sin; a principle with which absolutely nothing but "the life of God" can effectually deal. See further Rom. iii. 10 — 18, and notes in this Series. 20. ye] Emphatic by position. have not... learned] Better, did not learn; at their conversion. — "Learn" implies the instruction then received in the Lord's precepts, and in the holy bearings of His work. For a similar reference to the first apprehension by new converts of Gospel purity of principle, cp. 1 Thess. iv. 7; "God did not callus on terms of impurity." Christ] Who is the Subject-matter of His own message. 21. if so be] The Gr. interrogative (used also above, iii. 2) does not imply any doubt, necessarily, but calls the reader to verify the state ment. have heard him, &c] Better, as "Him" is emphatic by position, If it was He whom ye heard. The Gr. construction leads us to explain this not of listening to the Lord so much as of hearing about Him, or rather, of hearing "Him" as Truth rather than Teacher. "Christ" had been the Message they had received. — He does indeed, by His Word and Spirit, personally continue the "teaching" which in His earthly ministry He began (Acts i. 1); but that is not the point of the present words. have been taught by him] Better, if it was in Him that ye were taught. The instruction was "in Christ," if the teacher's limit and rule 118 EPHESIANS, IV. [v. 22. « have been taught by him, as the truth is in Jesus : that ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, was the truth of His Person and Work, and if those who received it were, by living spiritual union, "in Him," and so capable of "spiritual discernment" (1 Cor. ii. 14). This clause defines and explains the pre vious clause. as the truth is in Jesus] Better, even as In Jesus truth is. See last note, on the relation of spiritual "in-ness" to the standard and recep tion of spiritual truth. The emphasis here is as if to say, "If you were taught, as I say, in Him; in the lines of eternal fact and spiritual reality which do so truly meet in Him." — The question arises, why does the Lord's designation change from "Christ," ver. 20, to "^fcr«.r"here? Probably to mark the fact that the prophesied Christ is the historical Jesus. 22. that ye put off] The Gr. verb is the infinitive aorist. The tense tends to denote singleness of crisis and action. Some would render ' ' that you have" (or "did) put off." But the better explanation, or para phrase, is, "with regard to your (definite) putting-off." The "in struction in Christ" had informed them about such ? "putting-off"; its principles, secret, effects, as well as its fact. — But the view of the "putting-off" as a definite crisis remains; and the only question is, does this crisis appear here as a past or future one? The answer will be best given under the words "the old man," just below. For the present we refer to Col. iii. 9 as strongly favouring the reference here to a crisis past ; so that we may paraphrase, "you were taught in Christ with regard to the fact that your old man was laid aside." concerning the former conversation] On "conversation" see on ii. 3 above. The word (noun and verb) happens to be almost always used by St Paul in reference to the unregenerate life-course. — The clause means that the "putting-off" concerned, had to do with, a former life- course; it affected it, by being the close of it. — As concerning your former manner of life (R.V.). the old man] This important phrase occurs elsewhere Rom. vi. 6 ; Col. iii. 9. In Rom. it appears as a thing which "was crucified with Christ"; in Col. as a thing which "was once stripped off" by the saints. (Cp. the remarkable parallel words Col. ii. 11, as in the best supported reading, "in the stripping off of the body of the flesh. ") On the whole, we may explain the phrase by "the old state." And under this lie com bined the ideas of past personal legal position and moral position ; all that I was as an unregenerate son of Adam, liable to eternal doom, and the slave of sin. To "put off the old man" is to quit those positions, which, at the root, are one. It is to step into the position of personal acceptance and of personal spiritual power and victory ; and that position is "in Christ." The believer, lodged there, enters definitely and at once upon both acceptance and spiritual capacity for victory and growth. — " The old man" is thus not identical with "the flesh," which is an abiding element (Gal. v. 16, 17) in even the regenerate and spiritual, though it need no longer — even for an hour — be the ruling w. 23, 24.] - EPHESIANS, IV. 119 which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts ; and be 23 renewed in the spirit of your mind ; and that ye put on the 24 element ; it may be continuously overcome, in a practical and profound manner, in the strength of "the new man." — The phrases "old Man" and "new Man" have a probable inner reference to the doctrine of the First and Second Adam (Rom. v. 12 — 19; 1 Cor. xv. 21—58). The ¦ "putting off" and "putting on" may be expressed by saying, "ye broke connexion (in certain great aspects of connexion) with the First Adam, and formed connexion with the Second," connexion both of acceptance and of life-power1. corrupt] Lit., corrupting, growing corrupt; morally decaying, on the way to final ruin. Such, from the Divine point of view, is the con dition of ideal Man unregenerate, Man as represented by and summed up in Adam fallen. And such accordingly is the actual condition, from the same point of view, of unregenerate men, in whom the ideal is individualized. according to the deceitful lusts] Lit. , the desires of deceit ; desires after the forbidden, full of deceitful promises of joy and gain. See Gen. iii. for the great typical case, which perhaps is in view throughout this verse. — " According to" : — by natural result. Moral decay must follow in their path. — Cp. 2 Peter ii. 19. 23. be renewed] A present infinitive in the Gr. The idea is thus of progress and growth, the antithesis to the "corrupting" just above. The decisive fact of new position in and connexion with Christ was to result, and was resulting, in an ever developed spiritual experience, with its ever new disclosures both of need and of grace. Cp. 2 Cor. iv. 16. — We may paraphrase the clause (on the principle explained in the first note on ver. 22), "and with regard to your being renewed." in the spirit of your mind] I.e., practically, "in your spiritual life and faculty, coming out in the phase of thought and understanding,"' as distinct from e.g. the phase of emotion. "Spirit" can scarcely here refer to the Holy Ghost ; and it cannot bear the vague modern sense of "sentiment," or the like. It is the human spirit, as the substratum, so to speak, of every activity ofthe "inner man," and now specially ofthe activity which sees and grasps truth ("your mind"). See above, last note on ver. 1 7. — The Gr. may be rendered " by the spirit of your mind," as the instrument, or avenue, used by the Eternal Spirit in the process of renewal. And cp. Rom. xii. 2 for a good parallel. But usage is on the whole in favour of the rendering " in," in the sense of "with refer ence to." 24. that ye put on] See note on " put off," ver. 22. Here again is an aorist infinitive in the Gr. ; and we may correspondingly paraphrase, " (you were taught) with regard to the fact that the new man was put on." On the meaning of the phrase here, see notes on ver. 22, where it is explained by contrast and implication. The "putting on the new man" 1 On this aspect of Christian doctrine much excellent matter, will be found in an old book, The Gospel Mystery of Sanctification, by Walter Marshall, Fellow of New College, Oxford (about 1670). EPHESIANS, IV. [v. 24. new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness. is the inseparable converse to the "putting off the old man." There is no neutral border; to step out of the old position and connexion, out of Adam, is to step into the new, into Christ. Meantime, what is in covenant and in principle a thing done, is to be in realization and application a thing doing, a thing repeated. So we have Rom. xiii. 14; "put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ," an exhortation to a new act of realization. And cp. Col. iii. 12. The other side, the side (as we believe) of this passage, appears Gal. iii. 27; "ye did put on Christ." the new man] Practically, the new position and power (legal and moral, see note on ver. 22) of the regenerated self. In a deeper analysis, we trace (as above on ver. 22) a reference to the Second Man, the Second Adam, Christ. (See the quotation from St Ignatius, Introd., p. 28. See also, for another aspect of this phrase, ii. 15). By incorporation with Him His "members" become (in a sense needing reverent caution in the statement) repetitions of Him the glorious Archetype, as occupants of His position of Acceptance, and as "one spirit" with Him, and as enabled in Him to live a life whose principle is His — separation from sin lo God. To come to be "in Him" is thus to "put on the New Man" in the sense of part and lot in the standing and in the power of the Lord as Second Covenant Head. But, we repeat it, the practical reference of the verse is to the "newness" of the believer's standing and power, acquired in regeneration. which] Better, in modern English, who. after God] "Answering His great Idea, " His plan and will. is created] Better, was created. This "creation" was accomplished, ideally, when the new Covenant Head of the regenerate Race was pro vided, in eternal purpose; historically, when He was "made Man," in time; actually, for individuals, when each believer "put on Christ," came to be "in Him." Cp. on the thought of spiritual "creation" ch. ii. 10, 15; 2 Cor. v. 17; Gal. vi. 15; and especially Col. iii. 10, a close and suggestive parallel here. righteousness] Of which the essential idea is willing conformity to Law; "the keeping of His commandments." true holiness] Lit., sanctity of the truth. We use "sanctity" rather than "holiness," to mark the fact that the Gr. word (hosiotes) is not akin to that commonly rendered "holy." Its meaning is discussed by Abp Trench (N. T. Synonyms ii. § xxxviii). He shews it to be the virtue which "reverences everlasting sanctities, and owns their obli gation"; the intuitive conviction, e.g., of the sacredness of an oath, or of marriage, or, in the spiritual sphere, of God's absolute claims, wholly apart from a calculation of results. "Piety" would fairly, though not fully, represent the word. In two places (Rev. xv. 4, xvi. 5) the cognate adjective is used of God Himself. It there suggests His own inviolable regard for His own truth, in mercy and judgment. The word (noun, adjective, or adverb) occurs (as here) with "right- v. 25.] EPHESIANS, IV. Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth 25 eous" or "righteousness" Luke i. 75; 1 Thess. ii. 10; Tit. i. 8. It is the almost invariable rendering in the LXX. for the Heb. chdsSd; e.g. Psal. xvi. 10, quoted Acts ii. 27, xiii. 35 (A.V. "thy Holy One"); and Is. Iv. 3, quoted Acts xiii. 34 (where lit. "the holy things of David," the inviolable promises given to him l). " Ofthe truth" : — so lit., and so, looking at St Paul's usage, we trans late; not " of truth," as R.V. and marg. A.V. This "sanctity" or " piety" is "of" the truth of the Gospel, because the Gospel explains it, and it characterizes the Gospel ; and this is equally so, whether the thought is of its manifestation in Christ or in Christians, in Head or in Members. 25 — 32. The subject pursued: the revolution coming out in truthfulness, kindness, honesty, purity, patience, forgivingness. 25. Wherefore] From these deep principles come now the more detailed inferences of holy practice, and these fill most ofthe rest ofthe Epistle. Here and there (as in this verse, and in ch. v. 23) the basis of the whole in the relations of the Church to Christ appears explicitly. putting away lying] Cp. Col. iii. 9, 10, for a suggestive parallel. There, as here, truthfulness is connected with "new creation." He who is "in Christ " is, above all things, in a region of light and of right, whose first result will be the aim to do and speak truth ; the truth of entire and unselfish sincerity. — " Putting away " carries on the imagery of ver. 22. For the phrase, in reference to a definite break with sinful principle and practice, cp. Col. iii. 8 ; Heb. xii. 1 ; Jas. i. 21 ; 1 Pet. ii. 1 (A.V., " lay aside," in the last three places). And see below, ver. 31. — This "putting away" may be viewed either as a thing done, in prin ciple, for the member of Christ has, in respect of that union, definitely "done with sin " ; or as a thing to be done (Col. iii. 8, imperative), in each application of sinless principle. The Gr. is an aorist participle, and thus, grammatically, allows either view. We recommend the former, as most in harmony with the previous context. speak... truth] The application ofthe decisively accepted principle of truth. Observe the sober and humbling practicality of the Apostle's precepts ; as necessary now as ever. And earnestly observe the uncom promising condemnation, by the Gospel, of all kinds and phases of dishonesty. Nothing untruthful can possibly be holy. A pious fraud is, in the light of true Christianity, a most grievous sin. — The emphasis laid on truthfulness in Scripture is all the more significant of the character and origin of Scripture when we remember the proverbial Oriental laxity about truth. Lying is a vice deeply characteristic of heathenism. An Indian missionary said of his first convert, "he 1 The lit. rendering of the Heb. of Is. Iv. 3 is "the mercies of David, the assured > (mercies)." The LXX. represents, but does not translate, this. In Ps. xvi. 10 render lit., "Thy godly One," or perhaps, "Thy favoured, beloved, One." (Note by the Dean of Peterborough). 122 EPHESIANS, IV. [v. 26. with his neighbour : for we are members one of another. 26 Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon would often come to me with tears in his eyes, saying, ' I told you a falsehood, but it seemed nature to me to say yes when I should say no, and no when I should say yes'." (Communicated by the Dean of Peterborough). — Contrast Psal. xv. 2, 3. his neighbour] Primarily, the fellow-Christian is in view ; see the next clause. But this first bearing of such a precept is pregnant with a universal reference. For to the believer his fellow-Christian is a fellow- member of Christ, his fellow-man maybe. — On the word "neighbour" it is obvious thus to compare the Lord's parable, Luke x. 29 &c. for we are members one of another] •Each vitally and directly joined to the Head (see on ver. 16) and so, through Him, incorporated into one another. And thus comes a profound correction to that selfishness which inheres in falsehood. The interests of each member centre not in itself but in the Head, and the Head is equally related to and interested in each member. In Him, therefore, each is as important to each as each to itself. — Cp. Rom. xii. 5; 1 Cor. xii. 12 — 27. — On the universal application latent in this argument, see last note. 26. Be ye angry, and sin not] Another inference from co-member ship in the Lord. Anger, as the mere expression of wounded personality, is sinful ; for it means that self is in command. Anger, as the pure expression of repugnance to wrong in loyalty to God, is sinless, where there is true occasion for it. The Apostle practically says, let anger, when you feel it, be never from the former motive, always from the latter. "Ebullitions of temper," alike the greatest and smallest, the seen and unseen, are wholly forbidden here. The words are verbatim the LXX. version of Psal. iv. 4. The lit. Hebrew there is, "tremble, and sin not." And the verb rendered "tremble " may denote the tremor of grief, awe, or anger indifferently. The question of interpretation thus becomes one of context, and it has been suggested (by Dr Kay) that the reference is to the temptation to David's followers, during Absalom's rebellion, to give way to unholy wrath against the rebels. Dean Perowne, though saying that the LXX. Gr. is "certainly a possible rendering," refers the words to the tremor of awe before God. And he remarks that St Paul here gives the Gr. version "not in the way of direct citation." This last remark is im portant. The N.T. does not necessarily endorse a certain version of the O.T. by adopting its wording for a special purpose, without the decisive formula "it is written," or the like. Still, the suggestion of Dr Kay is noteworthy in itself, and its adoption would give a peculiar point and force to the words here. let not the sun go down] Wetstein quotes a curious parallel from Plutarch, (De Fraterno Amore, p. 488 B.), who says of the Pythagoreans that it was their rule, if betrayed into angry reviling, to shake hands before the sun set. — It is possible that we have Ps. iv. still in view here- "commune with your own heart upon your bed, and be still." As if to say, "if you have sinned in the way here forbidden, see that at least vv. 27—29.] EPHESIANS, IV. 123 your wrath : neither give place to the devil. Let him that H stole steal no more : but rather let him labour, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth. Let no corrupt communication 29 the sin is reversed and renounced before night calls you to bid your brother farewell and to meet your God in solitude. " your wrath] Better, perhaps, your provocation, as R.V. margin. The Gr. denotes an occasion of anger, rather than the feeling. See further on the cognate verb, vi. 4. The reasons, as well as the acts,-of quarrel were to be done with by set of sun. — The Gr. word is one often used by the LXX. of the provocation of God by His unfaithful people. 27. give place to the devil] The rendering suggested by some, "to the calumniator, " the heathen or Jewish slanderer, is quite untenable, in view of St Paul's use elsewhere of the word diabolos (lit., "Accuser") for the great Enemy. " Give place"" : — as to one who would fain intrude at a half-open door, intent on occupying the house. Personal anger gives just such a point d'appui to the Spirit of pride and hatred. " Wherever the devil finds a heart shut, he finds a door open " (Monod). And this is true not of individuals only, but of the Church and its life. 28. him that stole] Another moral inference from Christian incor poration. Here again, as above (see on ver. 25), and more obviously than ever, the Christian aspect of the duty has also a universal refer ence. — The Gr. is a present participle, and may equally well be rendered him that stealeth. It is possible, surely, that St Paul (like many a modern missionary and pastor) was prepared to find inconsistency so serious in the Christian community as to warrant the assumption of present thieving in some cases. (See above on ver. 25). Such things were surely to be found in the early Corinthian Church. The duty of strict restitution is not explicitly mentioned here. But in the Epistle to Philemon, written at the same time, it is both insisted upon and acted upon. his hands] Better, perhaps, his own hands. If personal activity has been spent on wrong, let nothing less than personal activity be spent on " working that which is good," with a view to honest getting and gain. that he may have to give] Impartation of good is of the genius of the Gospel ; and there would be a special call now to impart where there had been unholy appropriation before. Christian morality, as Monod remarks, is never satisfied with reform ; it demands conversion. 29. no corrupt communication] Or, better, speech, as R.V. — Another moral inference from membership in Christ. " Corrupt":— lit., "rotten, putrid." The Latin versions render simply sermo malus, and the Gr. adjective may (by usage) bear this merely general reference to " evil " of any sort ; worthlessness, useless- ness, as well as impurity. But we recommend the narrower reference, as certainly more native to the word, and as extremely likely h priori, 124 EPHESIANS, IV. [vv. 30, 31. proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers. ' 30 And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are 3i sealed unto the day of redemption. Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put in view of the moral pollution of common conversation in heathen society. the use of edifying] Lit., " for edifying of the need," i.e., as R.V. well paraphrases, for edifying as the need may he. The thought of the spiritual influence of one "living stone," and one "limb of Christ's body," upon another, so largely illustrated in previous passages, is still present. See ii. 21, iv. 16, and notes. minister grace] Lit., give grace, instrumentally. Bp Burnet says that he had never been in the company of his master, Abp Leighton, without receiving spiritual benefit. 30. grieve not] A distinct indication of the Personality of the Blessed Spirit. "Grief is certainly n personal affection, of which a Quality is not capable " (Pearson, On the Creed, Art. VIII). Putting aside passages where "spirit" obviously denotes "breath" or "wind," the usage of the word in Scripture favours the interpretation of it as always denoting a personality, good or evil. — See further Bp Pearson's discussion. — This precept, in this context, seems to indicate that polluting words would be a special "grief" to the Holy One. ye are sealed] Better, ye were sealed, at the definite crisis of re ception. See above, i. 13 and notes. the day of redemption] "the redemption of the purchased possession," i. 14, where see note. 31. all. ..all] Observe the uncompromising scope of the precept. Revolution in principle was to result in nothing short of revolution in temper and practice. wrath... anger] The two original words occur together also Rom. ii. 8 ; Col. iii. 8 ; Rev. xvi. 19, xix. 15 (" the wrath ofthe anger of God"). The word rendered "wrath" denotes rather the acute passion, and the other the chronic. See Trench, Synonyms, § xxxvi. — There is no real contradiction here to ver. 26. The aim there was to limit the admis sion of anger only to the rare cases where it could be present "without sin." Here the question is not of the exception but of the rule. Per sonal irascibility, personal feud and quarrel, were to be things past and gone out of Christian life. clamour] The violent assertion of rights and wrongs, real or sup posed. evil speaking) Gr. blasphlmia. Our word "blasphemy" is now con fined to " evil speaking " against God and Divine things, but the Gr. word includes all kinds of slander and opprobrium. It is used (verb, noun, or adjective) of evil speaking against man, or human things, often in N.T. ; e.g. 1 Cor. iv. 13 (A.V., "defamed"); x. 30; Col. iii. 8 ; Titus iii. 1. v. 32-] EPHESIANS, IV. 125 away from you, with all malice : and be ye kind one to 32 another, tender hearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven you. be put away] Or, taken away. The verb is in the aorist imperative, enjoining a decisive act, a definite and total rejection of these phases of evil. Such an act, and the maintenance of its results, would be only possible " in Christ " ; but so it could be done. See the parallel passage, Col. iii. 8, where the precept is as decisive and as inclusive as here. malice] The Gr. word sometimes bears the sense of "evil," "ill," in general; e.g. " the evil" of "the day," Matt. vi. 34. But where, as here, it forms one of a list of vices (cp. Rom. i. 29; Col. iii. 8; Tit. iii. 3 ; 1 Pet. ii. 1), it tends to mean the bitter and unjust habit of mind which we denote by malice. (See Trench, Synonyms, § xi.) It is here mentioned last, as the deeper and more subtle sin of which those just mentioned are manifestations. Unkindness, in its inmost secret, is to be a thing cast out. 32. be] Lit., become ; shew yourselves, in the actions and develop ments of life. kind] The Gr. word (noun or adj.) occurs in similar contexts, Luke vi. 35 ; Rom. ii. 4 ; xi. 22 (" goodness ") ; 2 Cor. vi. 6 ; Gal. v. 22 ; Col. iii. 12. Its primitive meaning is "useful"; hence "helpful," and so "kindly." — It is the original of "easy" in Matt. xi. 30; the Lord's "yoke" is a real yoke, but instinct with the lovingkindness of Him who imposes it. tender-hearted] The same Gr. word as in 1 Pet. iii. 8 (A.V., "piti ful"). It occurs nowhere else in N.T. Kind-hearted may perhaps be a better rendering, as somewhat wider. The word carries the idea of the previous word a little more into life and detail. forgiving one another] Lit., "forgiving yourselves." Usage and common sense alike fully justify the rendering of A.V. and R.V. (which reads, somewhat needlessly, "each other"). The "yourselves," as a grammatical fact, indicates the solidarity of the body within which the reciprocity takes place ; though this fine shade of meaning must not be exaggerated. For a close parallel to the precept see Col. iii. 13. The holy duty of heartfelt forgiveness, entire and unreserved, is prominent in the Lord's teaching ; cp. especially the Lord's Prayer (Matt. vi. 12 ; Luke xi. 4) ; Matt . xviii. 21, &c. No duty is more readily owned in the abstract, none more repugnant to the will in many a case in the concrete. But the law of Christ knows no exceptions, and grace is able to meet every demand for fulfilment. — It is humbling and instructive to see here, as in the Lord's Prayer, that the abiding need for mutual forgiveness is assumed. even as] The Divine pardon is at once supreme example and sacred motive. Cp. just below, ch. v. 2. God] The Father, "Fount of Deity," and as such styled often simply God where Christ is also and distinctively named (Joh. xvii. 3 ; 2 Cor. v. 19, xiii. 13; Jude 21). The SON has also Deity, but as in the Stream, not in the Fountain. See Pearson, On the Creed, Art. I. 126 EPHESIANS, V. [vv. i, 2. 5 Be ye therefore followers of God, as dear children ; and 1 walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given for Christ's sake] Lit. and better, in Christ. The reason of pardon, and the process of it, are alike summed up "in Christ," " in" Whom the Father reveals Himself as God of Peace : " in " Whom resides the immediate atoning reason of Peace; and "in" Whom, by grace and faith, are the human objects of pardon, " very members incorporate " of Him Who is eternally the Accepted One of the Father. — Cp. i. 7. hath forgiven] Lit., and better, did forgive ; ideally and in covenant, "before the world was " ; historically, when the Son was accepted and glorified as the perfect Propitiation, raised from the dead ; in individual experience, when each person believed (Rom. v. 1, &c.) It is important to observe how the Apostle bids them deal with Divine forgiveness not as a hope but as a fact. Cp. 1 Joh. ii. 1 2. you] There is considerable, but not preponderating, evidence for a reading "us". The question between the two readings is not of practi cal importance. Ch. V. 1 — 14. The subject pursued: Christ's Sacrifice the supreme example of self-sacrifice: Purity : Reproof of darkness by light. 1. therefore] The argument passes unbroken from the previous words. followers] Lit. "imitators." The A.V. consistently uses "follow," "follower," to render the original verb and noun; 1 Cor. iv. 16, xi. 1; I Thess. i. 6, ii. 14; 2 Thess. iii. 7, 9; Heb. vi. 12, xiii. 7; 1 Pet. iii. 13; 3 John 11. For the thought here cp. Matt. v. 45, 48; Luke vi. 36; 1 Pet. i. 15, 16, ii. 21, iii. 13. (In this last passage the true reading gives probably "emulators," not "imitators"; but this obviously is the same thought intensified in expression.) The "Imitation of God" is the true sequel and index of Peace with God and Life in God. It is, from another aspect, the Manifestation of God in His people. of God] Who, in that supreme instance, set the example of forgive ness. dear children] Better, beloved children. As children (see Matt. v. 45; 1 Pet. i. 17, where read, " If ye invoke Him as Father, &c") they were to shew the family likeness. And as children who had become such by a sacred act of pardoning love, they were to shew it above all things in self-forgetting kindness. — Cp. on the whole subject 1 John; esp. iii. 10. — The word rendered "children" is the word specially appropriate to ideas not of adoption but of birth. 2. walk] On the metaphor, see above on ii. 2. It is just in the steps of actual life that Divine grace is to shew itself, if it is indeed present. as Christ also] "Also," as an Exemplar additional to the Father, and in different though profoundly kindred respects. See next notes.— On "God" and "Christ" thus collocated «ee above on iv. 32. v. 3.] EPHESIANS, V. 127 himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweet- smelling savour. But fornication, and all uncleanness, or 3 hath loved. ..hath given] Better, loved. ..gave. Cp. for a pregnant parallel, Gal ii. 20, "Who loved me, and gave Himself for me." And, again of the community, the Church, ch. v. 25; Rev. i. 5. On this holy Love see above iii. 19; Rom. viii. 35; 2 Cor. v. 14. us] Considerable evidence, but scarcely conclusive, gives the read ing "you." All the ancient Versions favour the received text. given himself for us] as atoning, pacificatory, satisfactory Sacrifice. Thus we may safely interpret in the light of Scripture at large, and of the next following words here. But the business of this passage is with the Lord's Example, and it does not enter in detail into His Sacrificial work, nor employ (in the Gr.) the strict formula for substitution, such as the Lord Himself uses, Matt. xx. 28, "to give His soul a Ransom in place, instead, of many." The supreme Act of self-devoting love for others which, as a fact, the Atoning Death was, is here used as the great Example of all acts of self-devoting love in the Christian Church. As the Father has just been named as the Ideal for the forgiving Christian, so here the Son is named as the Ideal for the self-sacrificing Christian. " Hath given" ': — better, as R.V., gave Himself up, to the agents of death. — "For us" = "on behalf of us," not here (see first paragraph of this note) "in place of us." The phrase is the less precise and more inclusive. offering.. .sacrifice] Both Gr. nouns have a large and general mean ing in many places and thus often "overlap" each other; but where, as here, they occur together we must look for some limit and distinction. "Offering" is, on the whole, the more general word, "sacrifice" the more particular. "Offering" gives the thought of dedication and sur render at large to God's purposes; "sacrifice" gives that of such sur render carried out in altar-death. Not that "sacrifice" necessarily implies death, but death is its very frequent connexion. Bp Ellicott here sees in "offering" a suggestion1 of the obedience ofthe Lord's life, in "sacrifice," of His atoning death. a sweet-smelling savour] The same Gr. occurs Phil. iv. 18 (A.V. "an odour of a sweet smell"). It occurs often in the LXX. of the Pentateuch; e.g. Gen. viii. 21; and see esp. Lev. i. 9, 13, 17, where the reference is to atoning sacrifices (see ver. 3). It translates the Heb. riach nlchbach, "a savour of rest." In the picture language of typical sacrifices, the savour was "smelt" by the Deity as a welcome token of worship and submission, and thus it conveyed the thought of pacification and acceptance. Pagan sacrificial language has many parallels; see, e.g. Homer, //. I. 317, VIII. 549. Cowper renders the last passage "Next the Gods With sacrifice they sought, and from the plain Upwafted by the wind, the smoke aspires, Savoury, but unacceptable to those Above, such hatred in their hearts they bore" &c. The Lord's obedience and atonement "reconciled the Father unto 128 EPHESIANS, V. [v- 4- covetousness, let it not be once named amongst you, as be- 4 cometh saints ; neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of us" (Art. ii.), in that they perfectly met the unalterable demand of the holy and broken Law. He thus sent up, as the result of His work for us, the sacred "odour of rest;" becoming our "peace with God." 3. but] The word imports a sort of a fortiori. The Examples of the Father and the Son oblige the believer to a uniform life of holy unselfish love; ho,v complete then is the condemnation, for the believer, of all gross sins ! fornication] A sin lightly regarded by the heathen, and too often palliated in modern Christendom, but utterly condemned by the Lord and the Apostles. See esp. Matt. xv. 19; Acts xv. 20; 1 Cor. vi. 9, 13, 18; Gal. v. 19; Col. iii. 5; 1 Thess. iv. 3; Heb. xiii. 4; and below, ver. 5. Regarding it, as regarding all sin, total abstinence is the one precept of the Gospel; and the Divine precept will always be found, sooner or later, to coincide with the highest physical law. all uncleanness] Act, word, or thought, unworthy the children of the All-Pure. Observe the characteristic "all"; and cp. last note, and on iv. 31. covetousness] The Gr. word has occurred iv. 19 (A.V. "greediness"), where see note. Here as there the root idea is the grasp after another's own, whatever it may be; money, person, wife. This passage, more perhaps than any other, suggests that the word had acquired by usage, in St Paul's time, a familiar though not fixed connexion with sensual greed, just such as our word "covetousness" has acquired with the greed of material property. It would scarcely otherwise be used to denote an "unnamable" sin. once named] Lit. and better, even named; obviously in the sense of approving or tolerant mention. The Apostle himself here "names" these sins for exposure and condemnation ; and Christians may need, on occasion, to do the same, and very explicitly. But let them beware that it is done in the spirit of Scripture — in self-distrust, and as in God's presence. — For the phrase, 1 Cor. v. 1 gives a parallel, in the A.V. ; but the word "named" is probably to be omitted there from the text. The resolve not to "name " the Gods of Canaan (Psal. xvi. 4) is parallel and illustrative. 4. filthiness] Lit. "ugliness, deformity"; vice in its aspect as morally hideous. The Gr. word occurs here only in N.T. In the classics some cognate words bear a special connexion with forms of gross sensuality. foolish talking] Talk about sin, in the spirit of the "fool " who gloats and jests over his own or his neighbour's undoing. The word occurs here only in N.T. It and its cognates occur in the classics, but not in grave moral connexions. jesting] Obviously, by context, in the sense of immoral pleasantry, such as defiles some of the most brilliant pages of pagan literature, not to speak of Christian, so called ; and such as terribly impregnates vv. 5, 6.] EPHESIANS, V. 129 thanks. For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor un- s clean person, nor covetous man who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no 6 common talk in many strata and circles of society now. It must have been everywhere the fashion at Ephesus. The passage does not deal with the play of humour and wit in general. This is not forbidden in Scripture, and so far as it is the outcome of vigour, gladness, or (in the case of humour) tenderness, it may be quite in harmony with the strict piety of the Gospel. But to remain so it must be watched ; and see next note but one. — The Gr. word denotes specially the versatility of clever repartee ; but it is wider by usage. convenient] Better, as R.V., befitting; the French convenable. In older English "convenient" could bear this meaning; but it has lost it. Rom. i. 28 and Philem. 8 are parallel cases in the A.V. giving of thanks] as the far more "befitting" expression of the buoyancy ofthe believing spirit. See Col. iii. 16; Jas. v. 13. Such precepts, out of Scripture, have often been stigmatized as "puritanic," or the like; but they are nevertheless apostolic. And the nearer the conduct of inner life is brought to apostolic lines of principle the more natural will such precepts be felt to be. 5. ye know] More lit., ye know with acquaintance, or recognition; as if to say, "you know it with full recognition ofthe fact and the right." R.V. "ye know of a surety" ; but the Gr. seems to imply, as above, the reasons along with the certainty. no whoremonger... hath] Lit. every fornicator... hath not; a form of phrase which perhaps accentuates the individual exclusions from the kingdom. But it must not be pressed. who] Read, which; the Gr. relative pronoun, in the probable reading, being neuter. As if to say, "which word means, or implies, idolater." an idolater] See the close parallel Col. iii. 5. Lightfoot there says, "The covetous man sets up another object of worship besides God," or, more truly still, instead of God. And this is so, whatever is the object of his avarice. Monod remarks that this clause points rather to the miser than the seducer; and most certainly it includes the miser. But there is a terrible fitness also in the other application ; and we can not but think that "covetousness" had, in the apostolic age, a familiar reference, among other references, to immoral cupidity. See on iv. 19. inheritance] On the Gr. word, see note on i. 1 8. It conveys regularly the thought of possession by title, whether actually enjoyed or in pro spect. An "inheritor" (cllronomos) may be thus either a present occupant, or an expectant "heir," as context may indicate. Here probably the expected possession of glory is mainly in view, though we cannot exclude some reference to the organic antecedent to glory — the present possession of "life eternal." See further next note. the kingdom of Christ and oj God] the realm of the Son, Who "gave Himself for our sins," that He might be our "Lord" (Gal. i. 4; Rom. xiv. 9) ; and of the Father, Who gave the Son that the redeemed ephesians 9 130 EPHESIANS, V. [vv. 7, 8. man deceive you with vain words : for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of dis- 7 obedience. Be not ye therefore partakers with them. For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye light in the might "yield themselves unto God" (Rom. vi. 13). The secret of admission to this kingdom, and of congenial life in it, is " to know the only true God and Jesus Christ Whom He hath sent " (Joh. xvii. 3). The more common phrase "kingdom of God " is here displaced by one specially suggestive of the holy conditions of membership implied in the mention of Christ. — See note on iv. 32, on the word "God" in such collocations. What is the "Kingdom" here? On the whole, the glorified state, the goal of the process of grace. True, the word often, with obvious fitness, includes the period of grace in this life, in which most truly the Christian is a subject of the King (see e.g. Matt. xi. 11, xiii. 41, xxi. 43 ; Rom. xiv. 17 ; Col. i. 13). But usage gives the word a special connexion with the final state, glory; cp. esp. Matt. xxv. 34 (specially in point here) ; 1 Cor. xv. 50. See also the passages, closely akin to the present, 1 Cor. vi. 9, 10; Gal. v. 21; where the "shall not in herit" (as in 1 Cor. xv. 50) points to the idea of a coming "kingdom." Doubtless the state of will and life here in view excludes man, from God's point of view, from the present phase of His kingdom, in its spiritual essence (see 1 Joh. iii. 6, 15 &c. ; though the imagery is dif ferent). But the phase to come, that of perfect and eternal result and development, is naturally the predominant phase of the word. The practical meaning here, then, is " no such moral rebel can be, while such, a citizen of and pilgrim to the heavenly city." See Rev. xxi. 27. 6. Let no man deceive you] See for similar warnings Rom. xvi. 18; 1 Cor. iii. 18; 2 Cor. xi. 3; Col. ii. 8; 2 Thess. ii. 3; Jas. i. 26. vain] Lit., empty ; alien to the solidity of the immoveableyto.r that the body cannot sin without sin of the spirit ; that body and spirit alike are concerned in eternal retribution ; that the wrath of God is no figure of speech, and that His love cannot possibly modify His holiness. " Vain words " on these matters, and therefore such cautions as this, are never obsolete. Human sin began (Gen. iii.) with exactly such deceits, and they are the subtlest ingredient still in the secret of tempta tion. cometh] Is coming; is on its way, till in " the day of wrath " (Rom. ii. 5) it falls. the wrath of God] For this awful phrase cp. Joh. iii. 36 ; Rom. i. 18, ii. 5, 8, v. 9, ix. 22; Col. iii. 6 (parallel here); 1 Thess. i. 10; Rev. vi. 16, xix. 15; &c. And see note above on ii. 3 ("children of wrath "). children] Lit., sons. For the Hebraism, see above on the same "phrase, ii. 2. 1. Be not] Lit., Become not. Nolite fieri (Latin versions). partakers] in disobedience, and so in the coining wrath. 8. sometimes) Better, in modern English, once, formerly. See on ii. 13 above. — He refers to the whole period of their unconverted life. vv. 9— i i.J EPHESIANS, V. 131 Lord : walk as children of light : (for the fruit of the Spirit 9 is in all goodness and righteousness and truth ;) proving IO what is acceptable unto the Lord. And have no fellowship 1. darkness] Not merely " in the dark". So had the night of spiritual ignorance and sin penetrated them that they were, as it were, night itself, night embodied. On the metaphor of darkness see on iv. 18. light] Again, not merely "in the light." The Divine Light of truth, holiness, and resulting joy, had now so penetrated them that they were, in a sense, light embodied ; not seeing light only, but being light, and emitting it (see below, on ver. 13). Cp. Matt. v. 14. in the Lord] By your union with and knowledge of Him Who is the Light. walk] See above on ii. 2, &c, for the metaphor. children of light] See above on ii. 1, for the phrase " children, or sons, of." 9. for] The suppressed link of thought is, " Walk in a path wholly unlike that of the disobedient ; for the path of the light must be such. ' the fruit of the Spirit] Cp. Gal. v. 22. But the literary evidence here supports the reading the fruit of the light. The metaphor "fruit" (found here only in the Epistle) gives the idea not only of result but of natural and congenial result ; growth rather than elaboration. Christian virtue is, in its true essence, grace having its way. is in] Consists in, comes out in. all] Observe here, as continually, the absoluteness in idea of the Christian character. It is an unsinning character. "Whosoever is born of God, doth not commit sin" (1 Joh. iii. 9). The Christian, as a Christian, sins not : a truth at once humiliating and stimulating. goodness] The Gr. word occurs besides, Rom. xv. 14; Gal. v. 22; 2 Thess. i. n. The Gr. word like the English, while properly meaning the whole quality opposite to evil, tends to mean specially the goodness of beneficence, or at least benevolence. Such, on the whole, is the evidence of the LXX. usage. But the context here favours the wider and more original reference ; all that is anti-vicious. St Chrysostom sees in it here a special antithesis to anger; but this is surely too narrow a reference. See further on the word, Trench, N. T. Synonyms, § 1. righteousness) See above on iv. 24. And cp. Tit. ii. 12. The special reference here doubtless is to the observance of God's Law in regard of the rights of others, in things of honesty and purity. truth] The deep, entire reality which is the opposite to the state of " the simular of virtue that is incestuous" (King Lear, III. 3). 10. proving] Testing, by the touchstone of His declared and be loved Will ; putting every action, and course of action unreservedly to that proof, and unreservedly approving, in action, all that passes it. Cp. Rom. i. 28 (where lit. "they did not approve to retain God, &c"), xii. 2 (a close parallel herej; 1 Thess. v. 21. acceptable] Better, as R. V., well-pleasing. The word is kindred 9—2 132 EPHESIANS, V. [vv. 12, 13. with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove ta them. For it is a shame even to speak of those things 13 which are done of them in secret. But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light : for whatsoever to the noun rendered "pleasing" Col. i. 10. The whole question was to be, " 'What pleases God?" 11. unfruitful] " For the end of these things is death" (Rom. vi. 21). The metaphor of fruit, which we have just had (ver. 9), is almost always used in connexions of good. See a close parallel, Gal. v. 19, 22, "the works ofthe flesh"; "the fruit ofthe Spirit." darkness] Lit., the darkness, which you have left; from whose "authority" you have been "rescued" (Col. i. 13). The metaphor here (on which see on iv. 18) suggests rather the secrecy and shame of sin than its blindness. rather] Rather even, R. V., and so better; "rather, go the length of positive reproof." reprove] The verb, in classical prose, has always an argumentative reference; it is, to question, confute, disprove. And though in some N. T. passages this reference is not necessary to the sense, it is always admissible, and lies, as it were, behind the meaning of mere blame or censure. So here, the Christian is not merely to denounce evil, but by holy word and life to evince its misery and fallacy, to convict it (R. V. margin) of its true nature. 12. even to speak] See above on "not once named", ver. 12. Per haps the suggestion here is that the "reproof" of ver. 11 was to come more through a holy life, and less through condemnatory words. Not that such should never be used ; but that they are weak reproofs com pared with those issuing from a life of unmistakable holiness brought into contact with the unholy. The verse was terribly in point at the time, as every reader of ancient literature knows. Is it much less in point to-day, in the midst of our nominal Christendom? Neither, then, is ver. n. 13. all things that are reproved] More lit. , all things, wnen being reproved, or convicted. doth make manifest] Render, certainly, is made manifest, or more precisely, Is being manifested. So the Lat. versions, and, with verbal variations, all the older English Versions except the Genevan (1557), which has, loosely, " it is light that discovereth all things. " The Gr. is decisive against this and the A.V. The drift of this somewhat difficult verse, suggested by the context, seems to be; "You are light in the Lord; use this character upon the surrounding moral darkness, in order to the rescue of its victims, that they also may become light. Nothing but light will do this work ; no conquest over darkness, literal or spiritual, is possible except to light. And one evidence of this is that every such real conquest results in the subjects of darkness becoming now subjects of light, becoming lights." More briefly; "You are light; keep pure then, but shine far into the vv. 14, 15] EPHESIANS, V. 133 doth make manifest is light. Wherefore he saith, Awake 14 thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light. See then that ye walk is dark. And then other men, as already you, shall become light in the Lord." 14. Wherefore] With regard to the fact that whatever is really brought to light, in the sense of true spiritual conviction, becomes light. he saith] Or possibly It (the Scripture) saith. See note on iv. 8. Awake, &c] These words occur nowhere in the O.T. verbatim. St Jerome, on the verse, makes many suggestions; as that St Paul may have used an "apocryphal" passage, exactly as he used words from pagan writers (e.g. Tit. i. 12); or that he utters an immediate in spiration granted to himself, in prophetic form. Thomas Aquinas (quoted by Vallarsius on St Jerome) suggests that we have here the essence of Isai. lx. 1; where the Lat. reads "Rise, be enlightened, O Jerusalem, for thy light is come &c." Surely this is the true solution, if we add to it the probability that other prophecies contributed to the phraseology here. Dr Kay (in the Speaker's Commentary) on Isai. lx. 1 writes, "In Eph. v. 14 this verse is combined, in a paraphrase form, with li. 17, Iii. 1, 2. The Ephesians had been walking in darkness, as dead men... but the Redeemer had come and the Spirit been given. Therefore they were to awake (ch. li. 17, Iii. 1) out of sleep, and arise from the dead, that Christ the Lord might shine upon them, and they again shed His light on the Gentiles round." To the believer in the Divine plan and coherence of Scripture it will be abundantly credible that "the Lord" (Jehovah) of Isaiah should be the "Christ" of St Paul (cp. Isai. vi. 5 with Joh. xii. 41), and that the ' 'Jerusalem " of Isaiah should have an inner reference to the True Israel (Gal. iii. 29, vi. 16), in its actual or potential members. Dr Edersheim (Temple and its Services, p. 262), suggests that the Apostle may have had present to his mind language used in synagogue worship at the Feast of Trumpets. Rabbinic writers explain the trumpet blasts as, inter alia, a call to repentance; and one of them words the call, "Rouse ye from your slumber, awake from your sleep, &c." Some such formula may have been in public use. Bengel makes a similar suggestion here. But this would not exclude, only supplement, the reference to Isaiah. Another suggestion is that the words are a primitive Christian ' ' psalm ' ' (1 Cor. xiv. 26); perhaps "the morning hymn used each day by the Christians in Rome in St Paul's lodging," or "a baptismal hymn." Here again we have an interesting possibility, for such a "psalm " may have given or influenced the phrase here. But the introductory word "He, or it, saith" seems to us to weigh decidedly for the view that the words are, in essence, a Scripture quotation. sleepest... the dead] The sleep is more than sleep ; the sleep of death. But death itself is but as sleep that can be broken (Matt. ix. 24) to the Lord of Life. On spiritual death see above, on ii. 1 . shall give thee light] Better, as R.V., shall shine upon thee. — The '34 EPHESIANS, V. [vv. 16, 17. 16 circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise, redeeming the time, 17 because the days are evil. Wherefore be ye not unwise, idea, by context, is not so much of the light of conviction, as of that of spiritual transfiguration (2 Cor. iii. 18, iv. 4—6). The thought of "being light in the Lord" runs through the passage. It is a light con sequent upon awaking and arising. — -Another, but certainly mistaken, reading gives, "thou shalt touch Christ." The " Old Latin " followed it. It is due, in part at least, to the close similarity in form of two widely different Gr. verbs. 15 — 21. The subject pursued: the talent of time: temper ance: SPIRITUAL SONGS: THANKSGIVING: HUMILITY. 15. See then] The more general exhortation to a holy life- walk is resumed here, after the special entreaties thus given to avoid, yet in fluence, surrounding darkness. walk] The seventh and last occurrence in the Epistle of this impor tant metaphor. circumspectly] Lit., accurately, remembering the importance of details of both duty and danger, and the presence of the will of God in everything. The R.V. adopts here a Gr. text which requires the rendering, "Look therefore carefully how ye walk." But the documentary evidence scarcely warrants this change. And it has the objection of making the order of words in the Gr. more easy, and so more likely to be a tran scriber's correction. Observe how the illuminated Christian is to keep his eyes open. No guidance is promised him which shall dispense with patient watch fulness. fools] Lit., and better, unwise; spiritually unwise, blind to spiritual facts and consequences. 16. redeeming the time] Lit., buying out (from other ownership) the opportunity. So Col. iv. 5. The same phrase occurs (Aramaic and Greek) Dan. ii. 8; "I knew of a certainty that ye would buy the time"; where the meaning plainly is, "that ye would get your desired opportunity, at the expense of a subterfuge." Here similarly the mean ing is, "getting each successive opportunity of 'walking and pleasing God' at the expense of steady watchfulness." In Col. iv. 5 the special thought is of opportunities in intercourse with "them that are without." So, perhaps, here also, in regard of verses 12 — 14. — Cp. Gal. vi. 10; where render "as we have opportunity." because the days are evil] As if to say, "Make this sustained effort of getting opportunity; for it will be needed. The 'days' of human life in a fallen world do not lend themselves to it. Circumstances, in them selves, are adverse, for sin attaches to them." The Apostle very probably had in view the special difficulties of the then present time, but his words have a permanent bearing on each following period with its new phases of difficulty, all related as they are to the permanent underlying difficulty, sin. v. i8.] EPHESIANS, V. 135 but understanding what the will of the Lord is. And be 18 not drunk with wine, wherein is excess ; but be filled with 17. be ye not] Lit., become ye not; let not unwatchfulness pull you down. understanding] Better, probably, understand. what the will ofthe Lord is] ' ' The good, and perfect, and acceptable will of God" apprehended by the disciple who is "being transformed by the re?iewing of his mind" (Rom. xii. 2, a passage much in point here). Not independent reason but the illuminated perceptions of a soul awake to God will have a true intuition into "His will," both as to that invariable attitude of the Christian, subjection to and love of the will of God, and as to the detailed opportunities of action in that attitude. — Cp. on the Divine Will and our relation to it, Psal. cxliii. 10 ; Matt. vi. 10, vii. 21; Mark iii. 35; Joh. vii. 17; Acts xiii. 36, xxi. 14, xxii. 14 ; 2 Cor. viii. 5; Col. i. 9, iv. 12; 1 Thess. iv. 3, v. 18; Heb. xiii. 21; 1 Joh. ii. 17 ; below vi. 6. And on the example of the Lord, cp. Psal. xl. 8; Luke xxii. 42; Joh. iv. 34, v. 30, vi. 38. 18. drunk with wine] Cp. for similar cautions, Prov. xx. 1, xxiii. 30, 31; Luke xxi. 34; Rom. xiii. 13; 1 Cor. v. 11, vi. 10; Gal. v. 21; 1 Tim. iii. 3. "He fitly follows up a warning against impurity with a warning against drunkenness" (Bengel). wherein] In " being drunken with wine;" in the act and habit of intemperance. excess] R.V., riot. The word recurs Tit. i. 6; : Pet. iv. 4; and its adverb, Luke xv. 13. By derivation it nearly answers the idea ofthat which is "dissolute," i.e. unbound, unrestrained. The miserable exalta tion of strong drink annuls the holy bonds of conscience with fatal ease and certainty. but be filled] As if to say, "Avoid such false elevation; yet seek in stead not a dead level of feeling, but the sacred heights of spiritual joy and power, in that Divine Love which (Cant. i. 2) 'is better than wine'." filled with the Spirit] Lit., "in spirit," and so margin R.V. But the text R.V., and the A.V., are assuredly right. The definite article may well be omitted here (see on i. 17, and ii. 22), without obscuring the ref. to the Divine Spirit, if context favours it. And surely the context does so, in the words "in which" just above. The two "ins" ("in which," "in Spirit,") are parallel. And as the first "in" points to an objective cause of "riot," so surely the second "in" points to the objective cause, not subjective sphere, of joy ; to the Spirit, not to our spirit. — On the phrase "in (the) Spirit" cp. Matt. xxii. 43; Rom. viii. 9; Col. i. 8; 1 Tim. iii. 16; Rev. i. 10. The phrase "in the Spirit" (def. article expressed) occurs only Luke ii. 27. "In (the) Holy Spirit" occurs frequently, and in many places where A.V. has "by &c"; e.g., 1 Cor. xii. 3, 9. The parallel phrase "in an unclean spirit" occurs Mar. v. 2. On the whole, the idea conveyed appears to be that the possessing Power, Divine or evil, which from one point of view inhabits the man, from another surrounds him, as with an atmosphere. — "If the Spirit be in you, you are in It" (Jer. Taylor, Sermon for Whitsunday). 136 EPHESIANS, V. [v. 19. 19 the Spirit ; speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and Thus, "be ye filled in (the) Spirit," may be lawfully paraphrased, "Let in the holy atmosphere to your inmost self, to your whole will and soul. Let the Divine Spirit, in Whom you, believing, are, pervade your being, as water fills the sponge." And the contextgives the special thought that this "filling" will tend to that sacred exhilaration, "the Spirit's calm excess1", of which wine-drinking could produce only a horrible-parody. See next verse. 19. to yourselves] R. V., one to another. The Gr. admits either rendering (see above on iv. 32); but the parallel, Col. iii. (6 ("teaching and admonishing, &c") is clearly for the R. V. here, as the much most natural reference there is to mutual edification. It has been thought that we have here a suggestion of responsive chanting. But this is most precarious, to say the least ; the words being fully satisfied by the thought of the mutual spiritual help, most real and powerful now as then, given on any occasion of common spiritual praise. The first disciples thus "spoke one to another" in the united outburst of ascription and praise, Acts iv. 24. Still, it is interesting to remember that responsive Hymn-singing was, as a fact, used very early in Christian worship. In the famous Letter of Pliny to Trajan (written between A. D. 108 and A. D. 1 14), where the worship of the Christians is described, we read; "they are used to meet before dawn on a stated day, and to chant (carmen dicere) to Christ, as to a God, alternately together (secum invicem)." See Alford's note here. psalms. ..hymns. ..spiritual songs) It is impossible to fix precisely the limits of these terms; nor does the character of the passage, full of the spirit rather than the theory of praise, demand it. But there is probability in the suggestion that the psalm was generally a rhythmic utterance, either actually one of the O. T. psalms, or in their manner ; the hymn, a rhythmic utterance of praise distinctively Christian; and the spiritual song, or spiritual ode, a similar utterance, but more of experience or meditation than of praise. The canticles of Luke i. , ii., would thus rank as psalms; the inspired chant of the disciples (Acts iv.) as a hymn; and the possibly rhythmic "faithful words in the Pastoral Epistles (see esp. 2 Tim. ii. n — 13) as spiritual odes. Another suggested distinction is that a psalm (Gr., psallein, to play,) demanded instrumental accompaniment, a hymn did not. But this cannot be sustained in detail. "Psalm-singing" (see further 1 Cor. xiv. 26; Jas. v. 13) is thus a primeval element in not only Christian worship but Christian common life ; for the Apostle here evidently contemplates social gatherings rather than formulated services ; similar occasions to those formerly defaced by " excess of wine." The history of psalmody and hymnody in the Church cannot be discussed, however briefly, here. See articles on Hymns, in Smith's Dictionaries (of the Bible and of Christian Antiquities). We may L St Ambrose (" Splendor paterniz glorice," tr. by Chandler). vv. 20, 21.] EPHESIANS, V. 137 spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord ; giving thanks always for all things unto God and 20 the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ; submitting 21 yourselves one to another in the fear of God. just note that (1) Pliny (quoted above on this verse) speaks already of Christian hymnody, very early cent. 2; (2) St Justin, rather later cent. 2, in his account of Sunday eucharistic worship makes no distinct allusion to it ; but (3) a century later the allusions are frequent. See e.g. Eusebius, Hist. Eccl. v. 28, vii. 30. The "earliest known Christian hymn" is a noble Greek hymn, in anapsestic metre, to the Son of God, by St Clement of Alexandria, at the end of his Padagogus (middle of cent. 3). "Spiritual songs": — not necessarily "inspired," but charged with spiritual truth. making melody] Lit. "playing instruments" (psallontes, psalm). This seems to assume the use of lute or flute on such occasions. in your heart] Boih voice and instrument were literal and external, but the use of them both was to be spiritual, and so "in the heart." No other use of either, in and for worship, can be truly according to the will of God (Joh. iv. 24). to the Lord] Who is either directly or indirectly addressed in the song, and to Whom every act of the Christian's life is related. 20. always for all things] Because everything in hourly providence is an expression, to the believing heart, of God's "good, perfect, and acceptable will" (Rom. xii. 2). In view of this, the Christian will be thankful, both generally and as to details. St Chrysostom's habitual doxology was, " Glory be to God for all things"; and it was the last word of his suffering life. unto God and the Father] Lit. to the God and Father ; i. e. probably, of our Lord, and of us in Him. in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ] For the same phrase, or the like, cp. e.g. Matt. X..41, xxi. 9; Mar.xvi.17; Lukex. i7;Joh.v.43, xiv. 13*, 14*, 26, xv. 16, xvi. 23*, 24*, 26*, xvii. 11, 12 ; Acts iii. 6, ix. 27, x. 48; 1 Cor. v. 4, vi. 11; Phil. ii. 10; Col. iii. 17; Jas. v. 14; 1 Pet. iv. 14. Of these references, those marked * carry, like this verse, the idea of an approach to the Father through the Son. The whole series (com pared with parallel phrases of the O. T., e.g. Deut. xviii. 19; Ps. xx. 5, xliv. 5, lxxxix. 24) indicates, as an idea common to all the uses of the expression, that he whose "name " is in question is the basis or reason of the action. Empowered by the " name " of Jehovah, His revealed glory and will, the prophet speaks. Empowered by the "name" of Christ, going upon His revealed character as Mediator, the believer in Him offers praise and prayer to the Father. And so in such phrases as Ps. Ixiii. 4; "I will lift up my hands in Thy name"; the thought is of action upon a revelation of God and of the way to Him. — In Phil. ii. 10 we perhaps find combined the ideas of worship of and worship through Jesus Christ. 21. submitting] The primary point in the spiritual ethics of the 138 EPHESIANS, V. [vv. 22, 23. 22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as 23 unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church : and he is the Gospel is humiliation; self is dethroned as against God, and conse quently as against men. Here the special, but not exclusive, reference is to fellow-Christians. "[The precept] seems to have been suggested by the humble and loving spirit which is the moving principle of thanks giving" (Ellicott). Special applications of this great principle now follow, in a study of the relative duties of the Christian Home. 22 — 32. Special Exhortations : the Christian Home : Wike and Husband. 22. Wives] Cp. Col. iii. 18; 1 Pet. iii. 1 — 6. In Col. the correspond ing instructions about domestic duty are drawn expressly from the truth (Col. iii. 1) that the believer lives, in the risen Christ, a resurrection- life. submit yourselves] It is probable that the Gr. original has no verb here. R. V. accordingly reads in italics he in subjection to. But it is obvious that the thought if not the word is present, carried on from the last verse. The Gospel on the one hand recognizes and secures woman's perfect spiritual equality with man, an equality which modifies and ennobles every aspect of possible "subjection"; on the other hand recognizes and secures man s responsible leadership. your own] Words of special emphasis, suggesting the holy speciality of the marriage relation. as unto the Lord] Who is, in a peculiar sense, represented to the wife by the husband. In wifely submission to him she not only acts on the general principle of the acceptance of the Will of God expressed in circumstances : she sees in that attitude a special reflection, as it were, of her relations to the Lord Himself. Her attitude has a special sanction thus from Him. 23. the head] See i Cor. xi. 3. The husband and the wife are "one flesh" (ver. 31), and the husband, in that sacred union, is the leader. So Christ and the Church are one, and Christ is the Leader. even as] Not, of course, that the headship of the husband embraces all ideas conveyed by the Lord's Headship, but it truly answers to it in some essential respects; see last note, and its reference. Christ is.the head] See on i. 22, and last note but one here. the church] The highest reference of the word "Church" (see Hooker, quoted on i. 22, where see the whole note) is the reference proper to this passage. The out-called Congregation, truly living by the heavenly Bridegroom, in union with Him, and subject to Him, is in view here.— The sacred truth of the Marriage-union of the Lord and the Church, brought in here incidentally yet prominently, pervades (in different phases) the Scriptures. See not only the Canticles, but e.g. Psal. xiv. ; Isai. liv. 5, lxi. 10, lxii. 4, 5 ; Jer. iii. i4, xxxi. 32; Hos. ii. vv. 24, 25.] EPHESIANS, V. 139 saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject n unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ 25 2 — 20; Matt. ix. 15, xxv. 1 — 10; Joh. iii. 29; Gal. iv. 21 — 31; Rev. xxi. 2, 9, xxii. 17. — It is observable that in the Revelation as in this Epistle the metaphors of building and of bridal appear in harmony; the Mystic Bride is the Holy City and the Spiritual Sanctuary. Cp. Psal. lxxxvii. 3, where a possible rendering is, "With glorious offers art thou bespoken [for marriage], O City of God." and he is, &c] Read, with R. V., [being] himself the Saviour of the Body. The reference to the Lord, not to the earthly husband, is certain. And the emphasis (see on next ver.) is that Christ's unique position, in this passage of comparison, must be remembered ; as if to say, "He, emphatically, is to the Church what no earthly relationship can re present, its Saviour." Some expositors see in this clause, on the other hand, an indirect precept to the husband to be the "preserver," the loyal protector, ofthe wife. But the "but" which opens the next verse decides against this. saviour] So the Lord is called elsewhere, Luke ii. 11; Johniv. 42; Acts v. 31, xiii. 23; Phil. iii. 20; 2 Tim. i. 10; Tit. i. 4, ii. 13, iii. 6; 2 Pet. i. 1, 11, ii. 20, iii. 2, 18; 1 John iv. 14. Cp. for the word "save" in connexion with Him (in spiritual reference), Matt. i. 21, xviii. ri; Luke xix. 10; John iii. 17, v. 34, x. 9, xii. 47; Acts iv. 12, xvi. 31 ; Rom. v. 9, 10, x. 9; 1 Tim. i. 15; Heb. vii. 25. Deliverance and Preservation are both elements in the idea of Salvation. See further, above, on ii. 5. the body] See on i. 23, iv. 16. The Body is the Church, viewed as a complex living organism. The Gr. words SStir (Saviour) and sdma (body) have a likeness of sound, and perhaps a community of origin, which makes it possible that we have here an intentional "play upon words." 24. Therefore] Translate, certainly, But. The Apostle has guarded the husband's headship from undue comparison with the Lord's; but now he enforces its true likeness to it. their own] There is an emphasis in "own"; a suggestion at once of a holy limit, as against wandering loves, and of the fact that not only does the wife belong to the husband, but the husband to the wife (Monod). in every thing] In all relations and interests. This great rule will always, of course, be over-ruled by supreme allegiance to Christ; but its spirit will never be violated in the Christian home. 25. Husbands] Here the instruction is equally precise and more full. Cp. 1 Pet. iii. 7. love] "in deed and in truth " (1 John iii. 18), "giving honour unto the wife as unto the weaker vessel " (1 Pet., quoted above). Monod well says that the Apostle, true to the spirit of the Gospel, speaks to the wife of the authority of the husband, to the husband of devotion to the wife : each party is reminded not of rights, but of duties. 140 EPHESIANS, V. [v. 26. 26 also loved the church, and gave himself for it ; that he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by even as Christ] What a standard for the man's conjugal love, in point of elevation, holiness, and self-sacrifice ! "In Christian domestic life, Jesus Christ is at once the starting point and the goal of everything. . . We may even say that domestic life is the triumph of the Christian faith" (Monod). loved the church, &c] Cp. the same words of the individual soul, Gal. ii. 20, "Who loved me and gave Himself for me." The two places are in deepest harmony. Cp. also above, ver. 2. "Loved:" — in the pre-mundane view and grace indicated e.g. i. 3 — 7. Cp. 2 Tim. i. 9. gave] Lit. (and so Gal. ii. 20), gave over, delivered up, to suffering and death. The same word is used e.g. Rom. iv. 25, viii. 32. himself] The supreme Ransom-gift. Cp. Tit. ii. 14 (where the Gr. verb is simply "gave") for it] Better, in this vivid context, for her. — On the preposition, see above on ver. 2. 25. sanctify and cleanse it] Better, again, her. And the pronoun is slightly emphatic by position; as if to say, "It was in her interest that He did this, and so in the wife's interest the husband should be ready for sacrifice." "Sanctify and cleanse:" — lit., sanctify, cleansing; both the verbs being in the aorist, and being thus most naturally referred to one and same crisis, not, as RV. seems to imply, ("sanctify, having cleansed") to a sanctifying process consequent on a cleansing. The Church was decisively "sanctified," separated from the claim and dominion of sin unto God, when she was decisively "cleansed," accepted as guiltless. It needs remembrance that the word "to sanctify" lends itself equally, according to context, to ideas of crisis and of process. In one aspect the human being, decisively claimed and regenerated by God for Him self, is sanctified. In another aspect, in view of each successive subjective experience of renunciation of self for God, he is being sanctified. — The sanctifying crisis here in view is that of regeneration. This is put before us ideally as the regeneration of the Church. The Idea is realized his torically in the regeneration of individuals, with a view to the final total. — On this individual aspect of the matter, cp. John iii. 3, 5 ; 1 Cor. vi. 1 1. with the washing of water] Lit., by the laver of the water. So Tit. iii. 5 ; "through the laver of regeneration," the only other N.T. passage where the noun rendered "laver" occurs. Here, undoubtedly, Holy Baptism is referred to. It is another and most important question, what is the precise bearing of the Rite upon regeneration ; whether it is the special channel of infusion of the new life, or its federal and legal "conveyance," the Seal upon the Covenant of it, and upon the actual grant of it. But in any case there is a con nexion, divinely established, between Regeneration and Baptism. For ourselves, we hold that Baptism is a true analogue to the sacrament of Circumcision, and that its direct and essential work is that of a Divine v. 27.] EPHESIANS, V. 141 the word, that he might present it to himself a glorious 27 church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; seal. This view we believe to be (1) the view in truest harmony with the whole spirit of the Gospel, (2) the view most consonant with observed facts, (3) the view which, under wide varieties of expression, was held, in essence, by the pre-medieval Church (and not wholly forgotten even in the medieval Church), and by the great Anglican Protestant doctors of tlie 16th and 1 7th centuries. But it is to be remembered that this view leaves untouched the fact of a profound and sacred connexion between New Birth and Baptism. And it is entirely consonant with language of high reverence and honour for the Rite, language often applicable, properly, only to the related Blessing, under remembrance that the Rite derives all its greatness from the spiritual Reality to which it stands related. by the word] Quite lit., in utterance, or In an utterance. The Gr. is rhlma, not logos. We may translate (having regard to the N.T. usage of "in," in similar cases), attended by, or conditioned by, an utterance : as if to say, not a mere laver of water, but one which is what it is only as joined to declared truth. — What is the "utterance" in ques tion ? The Gr. word (in the singular), occurs elsewhere in the Epistles, Rom. x. 8, 17; 2 Cor. xiii. 1, below, vi. 17; Heb. i. 3, vi. 5, xi. 3; 1 Pet. i. 25 (twice). In almost every case it refers to a definite Divine utterance, whether of truth or of will. We explain it here accordingly as the utterance of that New Covenant of the Gospel of which Baptism is the seal, or, to put it more generally, the revelation of salvation embodied in "the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost" (Matt. xxviii. 19), or in "the Name ofthe Lord Jesus" (Acts xix. 5). Baptism, in connexion with that revelation and the reception of it, is " the laver of new birth" (Titus iii. 5). Cp. the parallel 1 Pet. iii. 21 ; in which we see the same care to correct any possible inferences from the material aspect of Baptism, as if the rite itself, apart from the moral surroundings of the rite, were a saving thing. 27. that he] In the Gr. "He" is emphatic; "He to Himself;" with stress on the Lord's personal action. present] Cp. for similar use of the same Gr. word 2 Cor. iv. 14, xi. 2; Col. i. 22, 28. In Jude 24 a similar word is used. — The thought is of the heavenly Bridegroom welcoming the glorified Bride at the Marriage Feast hereafter. True, she is now "His Spouse and His Body;" but the manifestation then will be such as to be, in a sense, the Marriage as the sequel to the Betrothal. The words "present to Himself" suggest that the Bride is not only to be welcomed then by her Lord, but welcomed as owing all her glory to His work, and as being now absolutely His own. a glorious church] Translate rather, the Church arrayed in glory. Cp. Rev. xix. 7, 8. And see Canticles iv. 7. She "shall be like Him, for she shall see Him as He is" (1 Joh. iii. 2). He who gave Himself 142 EPHESIANS, V. [vv. 28—30. 28 but that it should be holy and without blemish. So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that 29 loveth his wife loveth himself. For no man ever yet hated his own flesh ; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the 30 Lord the church : for we are members of his body, of his for her had also given Himself to her, and His nature shall now be manifested in her eternal state. holy] Absolutely, without qualification, and for ever, consecrated to Him. without blemish] The Gr. is cognate to that in Cant. iv. 7 ("there is no blemish in thee"). The holy and perfect principle, perfect at length in all the conditions of its working, shall come out in actual perfection of spiritual beauty. — Cp. for the same Gr. word, i. 4 (side by side there also with "holy"); Phil. ii. 15; Col. i. 22; Heb. ix. 14; 1 Pet. i. 19; Jude 24; Rev. xiv. 5. 28. So] With a love akin to the love of Christ just described. The Gr. word is one whose reference tends to preceding ideas. as their own bodies] A clause explanatory of "So" just above. It was thus that Christ loved the Church. In eternal purpose, and in actual redemption and regeneration, she is at once His Bride and His Body. The husband is accordingly to regard his wife as, in a profound and sacred sense, part and parcel of his own living frame. his wife] Lit., his own wife. The Gr. emphasizes the " self -ness,'' so to speak, of the relation : " his own wife. ..his own self." 29. no man ever] under normal conditions. True, in a distorted mental state a man may "hate his own flesh." And in obedience to the will of God a man may so act as to be said to hate it ; to choose that it should suffer rather than that God's will should not be done (see, for such a use of "hate", Luke xiv. 26). But under normal conditions it is not only man's instinct but his duty to protect and nourish that mysterious work of God, his body, connected by God's will in a thousand ways with the action of his spirit. "Self-love," whether in the direction of flesh or of spirit, acts sinfully only when it acts outside God as the supreme and all-embracing Reason and Good. the Lord] Read, with full documentary evidence, Christ. 30. members] Limbs; the word used above iv. 25; and cp. Rom. xii. 4, 5; 1 Cor. vi. 15 (a strict parallel), xii. 27. of his flesh, and of his bones] Three important MSS. (ABN) supported by other but not considerable authority, omit these words. It has been suggested that they were inserted by transcribers from Gen. ii. 23, as the next verse is certainly quoted from Gen. ii. 24. But the phrase here is not verbally close enough to that in Gen. to make this likely. A transcriber would probably have given word for word, while the Apostle would as probably quote with a difference, such as we find here. And the difference is significant. " We " are not said here to be "bone of His bone &c," which might have seemed to imply that our physical frame is derived from that of the Incarnate Lord, but, more vv. 31, 32-] EPHESIANS, V. •43 flesh, and of his bones. For this cause shall a man 31 leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. This 32 generally, " limbs of His body, out of His flesh and out of His bones." Our true, spiritual, life and being is the derivative of His as He is our Second Adam, in a sense so strong and real as to be figured by the physical derivation of Eve from Adam. " As for any mixture of the substance of His flesh with ours," says Hooker (Eccl. Pol. v. 56, end), "the participation which we have of Christ includeth no such gross surmise1". In brief, this statement, in the light of other Scripture, amounts to the assertion that "we," the believing Church, as such, are, as in the case of Eve and Adam, at once the product of our Incarnate Lord's existence as Second Adam, and His Bride. This profound and precious truth is not dwelt upon, however. Strictly speaking, it is only incidental here. 31. For this cause, &c] The Gr. in this verse is practically identical with that of Gen. ii. 24. We may reverently infer that the Apostle was guided to see in that verse a Divine parable of the Coming Forth of the Lord, the Man of Men, from the Father, and His present and eternal mystical Union with the true Church, His Bride. "For this cause:" — the cause of His (covenanted and foreseen) Union with us as Incarnate, Sacrificed, and Risen; in order to realize that Divine Idea. joined] A kindred word is used in a kindred passage, full of impor tance here, 1 Cor. vi. 17. 32. This is, &c] More precisely, This mystery is great. For the word "mystery" see above, i. 9, iii. 3, 4, 9; and below vi. 19. The word tends to mean something of the sphere of spiritual truth not dis coverable by observation or inference, but revealed. The thing answering to such a description in this context is, surely, " the mystical union and fellowship betwixt Christ and His Church." It can scarcely be the marriage union of mortal man and wife. That, as this whole passage bears witness, is a thing most sacred, Divine in institution, and, in the popular sense of the word, "mysterious." But it scarcely answers the idea of a revealed spiritual truth. We paraphrase the verse, then; "This revealed mystery, the Union of Bridegroom and Bride, is great; but I say so in reference to the Bridal of Redemption, to which our thought has been drawn." The Vulgate Latin, wliich forms in its present shape the authori tative Romanist version, translates here, "sacramentum hoc magnum est, ego autem dico in Christo et in ecclesid"; from which the Roman theology deduces that "marriage is a great sacrament in Christ and in His Church " (see Alford here, and the Catechism of the Council 1 The remarkable chapter which thus closes deserves very careful study. 1 1 will be seen that Hooker's view of " Christ's body in ours as a cause of immortality" is that it is "a cause by removing, through the death and merit of His own flesh, that which hindered the life of ours." H4 EPHESIANS, V. VI. [vv. 33; 1. is a great mystery : but I speak concerning Christ and the 33 church. Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband. 6 Children, obey your parents in the Lord : for this is right. of Trent, pars ii. qu. XV.— xvn). The "Old Latin" read "in ecclesiam," "with reference to the Church." but 1] The pronoun is emphatic, possibly as if to say, " I, as distin guished from the narrator of the marriage in Eden." On this whole passage Monod's remarks are noteworthy. He declines to see, with Harless, a mere accommodation of the words of Genesis. For him, those words, narrating true facts, are also a Divinely planned type. "When St Paul quotes, by the Holy Spirit, a declaration ofthe Holy Spirit, it is the Holy Spirit's thought and not his own that he gives us. ..The relation which he indicates between the two unions. ..is based in the depths of the Divine thought, and on the harmony esta blished between things visible and invisible. ..The marriage instituted in Eden was really, in the plan of God, a type of the union of Christ with His Church." For a reference by the Lord Himself to the passage in Genesis, though with another purpose, see Matt. xix. 4, 5 ; Mark x. 6 — 9. For Him, as for His Apostle, the passage was not a legend but an oracle. 33. Nevertheless] The word recalls the reader from the Divine but incidental "mystery" of the mystical Union to the holy relationship which is at once a type of it and sanctified and glorified by it. of you] Add, with the Gr., also: "you Christian husbands, as well as the heavenly Husband." his wife] His own wife, as above, ver. 28. reverence] Lit., "fear," and so R.V. The fear of respect, of rever ence, is obviously meant, and we prefer the expression of this as in A.V. The word "fear " is indeed continually used in Scripture of the holy and happy reverence of man for God, and so has lost all necessary connexion with painful ideas. But just because we have here a precept for a human mutual relation, the word which best keeps painful ideas out seems to be not only the most beautiful, but the most true to the import of the Greek, in such a context. Ch. VI. 1 — 4. The Christian Home: Children and Parents. 1. Children] Cp. Col. iii. 20. obey] The Gr. word differs from that rendered "submit yourselves" (ver. 22). It is the same as that below, ver. 5, rendered "be obedient." The child, and the bondservant, are to render an obedience (so the words seem to indicate) different in kind from that of the wife, which is so largely tempered by equality in other respects. "Disobedience to parents" (Rom. i. 30; 2 Tim. iii. 2) appears in Scripture as a symptom of a state of the gravest evil. The example of the Lord stands in sacred contrast to it, for all ages of the Church (Luke vv. 2, 3.] EPHESIANS, VI. 145 Honour thy father and mother; (which is the firsts commandment with promise;) that it may be well with 3 ii. 51). It is in the school of the well-ordered Christian home that the true idea of the Christian's position, divinely filial in its freedom, yet (1 Cor. ix. 21) "law-abiding unto Christ," should be first illustrated as well as taught. parents] Mothers as well as fathers (see next verse). Scripture uniformly upholds the authority of the mother. Cp. Prov. i. 8, vi. 20. in the Lord] I.e., let your obedience be in Him; rendered as by those whose action gets its reason and secret from union with Him. No doubt the Apostle assumes here a family in which the parents are Christians ; but he certainly would not limit the precept to such a case, as it would be limited if "your parents in the Lord" was the verbal connexion. In the case of Christian parentage, the children, as such, would certainly be reckoned as within the covenant, and, in this sense, "in the Lord." Cp. 1 Cor. vii. 14 ("now are the children holy"). It would be for their own consciences before God, none the less, to ask whether they were also "in Christ" in that inner and ultimate sense which is, spiritually, "new creation" (2 Cor. v. 17). There is some evidence, but quite inadequate, for the omission of the words "in the Lord." right] Just ; not merely beautiful, or better, but according to the Law of God, both in Nature and in Revelation. The Apostle does not deal here with the limits of filial obedience in cases where the Divine Will crosses the parental will. He has the great rule and principle wholly in view. 2. Honour, &c] Exod. xx. 12; Deut. v. 16. The Gr. here is verbatim that of the LXX. On the duty, cp. Matt. xix. 1 9 ; Mark vii. 10, x. 19; Luke xviii. 20. The "honour" is that not of mere sentiment but of obedience. See for illustration, Matt. xv. 4 — 8. which is] He adds a significant circumstance about the Command ment the first. ..with promise] In the Decalogue, to which here the reference plainly is, it is in fact the only "commandment with" definite "promise." But the Decalogue is, so to speak, the first page of the whole Law-Book of Revelation. " With" : — lit. "in" ; attended, surrounded, by promise. 3. that, &c] The Gr. is nearly verbatim from the LXX. of Exod. xx. and Deut. v. It is observable that the Apostle omits the last words of the original promise. Is not this on purpose, to dilate the reference to the utmost? The Sinaitic limitation was but a special application of a perpetual principle of Providence, illustrated, we may observe, in the remarkable instance of the durability of the Chinese race and empire in its "land." Not for Jews only, nor for Christians only, is the promise, but for man, with such modifications of the meaning of "the earth," or "land," as circumstances may bring. To seek a reference here to "the better country, that is, the heavenly" ephesians io 146 EPHESIANS, VI. [v. 4. 4 thee, and thou mayest live longon the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath : but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. (Heb. xi. 16), is a lawful and beautiful accommodation, but not in point as an interpretation. mayest live] Quite lit., "shalt live." And it may be so read. But usage makes it at least probable that the A.V. (and RV., text) repre sent rightly the intention of the Greek. Observe, in passing, the hint given in these verses of the familiarity of the Gentile converts of St Paul with the O.T., and of the Divine authority which, he takes it for granted, they recognized in the Deca logue. See further, Appendix H. 4. fathers] We may equally well render, parents. Moses' parents are called (Heb. xi. 23, Gr.) his fathers. The expression is found in the classics, Greek and Latin. — The father is the head of authority in the home, but the oneness of husband and wife, to speak of that only, secures the high authority of the mother also. This is assumed in the Fifth Commandment. provoke not... to wrath) The same word occurs Col. iii. 21, and the cognate noun above, iv. 26, where see note. In Col. the suggestive words follow, "lest they be discouraged." The precept and the reason are both full of holy wisdom — Here, as in the section on Marriage, observe how the two parties are reminded each exclusively of his own duties. At the present time, undoubtedly, parental authority is at a low ebb in English Christendom. Its revival will depend, under God, on the active recognition of the whole teaching of such a Scripture as this, full of the warrant of parental government, and of the wisdom of parental sympathy. bring them up] The Gr. conveys the idea of development (here in the sphere of character and principle) by care and pains. The same word has occurred ver. 29, with reference to bodily development. nurture] Better, discipline. "Chastening" (R.V.) seems to us too narrow a word, at least in its ordinary sense of punitive discipline. It is true that in the leading N.T. passage of the kind (Heb. xii. 5 — 10 ; and cp. Rev. iii. 19) the word (or its kindred verb) obviously conveys that idea. And the verb is used of the terrible "chastisement" of the Roman scourge (Luke xxiii. 16, 22). But a wider meaning is, by usage, quite lawful, and it is certainly in point here. All the wholesome restraints of a wise early education are in view ; all training in the direction of a life modest, unselfish, and controlled. Such will be the discipline of the true Christian home, and of its partial extension, the true Christian school. admonition] The Gr. noun recurs 1 Cor. x. 11; Tit. iii. 10. For the kindred Gr. verb, see Acts xx. 31; Rom. xv. 14; 1 Cor. iv. 14; Col. i. 28, iii. 16; 1 Thess. v. 12, 14; 2 Thess. iii. 15. It will be seen that the noun relates to the warning side of instruction, a side too often neglected. w. 5,6.] EPHESIANS, VI. 147 Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters ac- 5 cording to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ ; not with eyeservice, as men- e of the Lord] On His revealed principles, learnt of Him, and for His sake. He is everywhere in the Christian home. 5 — 9. The Christian Home : Servants and Masters. 6. . Servants] Bondservants, slaves. Cp. Col. iii. 22 — 25 ; and see 1 Cor. vii. 21, 22; 1 Tim. vi. 1 — 2; Tit. ii. 9 — 10; Philemon; 1 Pet. ii. 18 — 25. The Gospel nowhere explicitly condemns slavery. But both O.T. and N.T. state principles which are fatal to the extreme forms of slavery familiar in the Roman world, forms which allowed no rights whatever, in theory, to the slave. And the Gospel, in the act of proclaiming the complete spiritual equality of slave and freeman, re vealed a principle which was sure ultimately to discredit slave-holding even in its mitigated forms. See Bp Lightfoot's Introduction to the Ep. to Philemon, and the pamphlet (by Prof. Goldwin Smith) quoted there, Does the Bible sanction American Slavery? We may observe further that the great Gospel doctrine of the be liever's "slavery" to his Master, Christ (cp. e.g. 1 Cor. vii. 22), when once made familiar to the conscience and will, would inevitably tend to a peculiar mutual rapprochement between Christian masters and slaves while the institution still legally survived, and would do infinitely more for the abolition of slavery than any "servile war." Prof. G. Smith well observes, "Nothing marks the Divine character of the Gospel more than its perfect freedom from any appeal to the spirit of political revolu tion" (Does the Bible, &c, p. 96). With impartial hands it not only sanctions, but sanctifies, subordination to constituted authority (Rom. xiii.), and meanwhile ennobles the individual, in respect of all that is highest in the word liberty, by putting him into direct and conscious relations with God. The Gospel won many of its earliest converts from the slave-class. This is less wonderful, when the vast number of slaves is remembered. The little territory of Corinth alone contained nearly half a million slaves. In the present and similar passages the primary reference to slavery will, of course, be remembered. But there is a secondary and perma nent reference to ordinary service, of all varieties. according to the flesh) With the implied thought that they were not the masters of their bondmen's spirits, and that the bondmen were themselves, spiritually, the slaves of Christ. So Col. iii. 22. with fear and trembling) With earnest, conscientious care and rever ence. For the phrase, and this as its meaning, cp. 1 Cor. ii. 3; 2 Cor. vii. 15; Phil. ii. 12. singleness of your heart] The honest desire to do right for its own sake, or rather for the Lord's sake ; as against the self-interested seeking for praise or promotion. Cp. for the word rendered "singleness", Rom. xii. 8; 2 Cor. i. 12 (perhaps), viii. 2, ix. 11, 13, xi. 3 ; Col. iii. 22. unto Christ] Cp. Rom. xiv. 7 — 9; a suggestive parallel. 148 EPHESIANS, VI. [vv. 7—9. pleasers; but as the servants of Christ, doing the will of 7 God from the heart ; with good will doing service, as to the 8 Lord, and not to men : knowing that whatsoever good thing any man doeth, the same shall he receive of the Lord, 9 whether he be bond or free. And, ye masters, do the same 6. eyeservice] The word is found elsewhere only Col. iii. 22, and was possibly coined by St Paul. It is the "service" which works for another only under the compulsion of inspection, and only in external action. menpleasers] With no higher aim than the personal comfort of getting, anyhow, the master's approval or indulgence. Cp. Gal. i. 10 for a close parallel. The underlying fact is that the earthly master can be "pleased" by a merely specious service, but that the Christian is really enslaved to One who sees infallibly whether the service rendered Him is service of the heart. This comes out in the following clauses. the will of God] expressed in the present fact of your servile duty. Thus did the Gospel dignify the lowest walk of human life, in the act of imposing the yoke of Christ on the whole being ofthe Christian. "A servant with this clause Makes drudgery divine; Who sweeps a room as for Thy laws Makes that and th' action fine." Herbert, The Elixir. the heart] Lit., the soul. So (Gr.) Col. iii. 23. A spring of inner most good-will, alike to the Heavenly Master and the earthly, must work within. Cp. 1 Tim. vi. 1, 2. 8. knowing] as a certainty of the Gospel. For the Christian's prospect of "reward," cp. Matt. v. 12, vi. 1, 4, xvi. 27; Luke vi. 35, xiv. 14; Rom. ii. 6—10; 2 Cor. v. 10; Heb. x. 35; Rev. xxii. 12; &c. The essence of the truth is that the obedience of love is infallibly wel comed and remembered by Him to whom it is rendered. "Well done, good and faithful servant" (Matt. xxv. 21, 23), is His certain ultimate response to every true act of the will given up to His will. This pro spect, taken along with the conditions to it, has nothing that is not deeply harmonious with our justification for Christ's Merit only, em braced by faith only. It is the recognition of love by Love, of grace by the Giver. From another point of view it is the outcome of a process of growth and result (Gal. vi. 7 — 9). the Lord] Christ. Cp. among many passages Matt. xxv. 34 — 36; 2 Cor. v. 9, 10. In view of the context, the point would be still clearer if the Gr. were rendered the Master. 9. masters] The Gr. is lit. "Lords." But English usage forbids that word here. See last note; and the parallel passage, Col. iv. 1. do the same things] Faithfully consult their true interests, be loyal to your responsibilities in regard of them. These are "the things" you look for from them towards yourselves. v. io.] EPHESIANS, VI. 149 things unto them, forbearing threatening : knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him. Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the 10 forbearing threatening) More lit., "giving up your threatening, 'the too habitual threatening'" (Ellicott). your Master also] Better, in view of the true order of the Gr., their Master and yours. respect of persons] Cp. Acts x. 34 ; Rom. ii. 1 1 ; Col. iii. 25 ; Jas. ii. 1,9. 10 — 20. The Spiritual Combat: the Secret of Strength; the Antagonists ; the Armour; Intercessory Prayer. 10. Finally] Lit., "for the rest;" "for what remains.'' This may possibly mean "for the future," "from henceforth" (R. V. marg.). But the more probable reference is to "what remains of thought and precept." Had the Epistle dwelt on spiritual weakness as a previous characteristic of Ephesian Christian life, the other alternative might have been preferable ; but it has not. For the Gr. phrase (identically, or nearly so), cp. Matt. xxvi. 45 (A. V. "now"); 1 Cor. vii. 29; 2 Cor. xiii. 11; Phil. iii. 1, iv. 8; 1 Thess. iv. 1; 2 Thess. iii. 1; 2 Tim. iv. 8; Heb. x. 13. — "Wisely does the Apostle, after the special injunctions to husbands and wives, &c. , now in general enjoin it on all together to be strong in the Lord " (St Jerome). And observe that the deep secrets of spiritual victory now to be spoken of are necessary to the spiritual per formance ofthe common duties just enjoined. my brethren] These words are probably to be omitted ; ¦- possible insertion by transcribers from Phil. iii. 1, iv. 8. — The documentary evidence is scarcely decisive, but the absence elsewhere in the Epistle of the address " Brethren " is in favour of omission. be strong) The Lat. versions have confortamini ; a reminder of the true idea of "comfort," "comforter," in older English usage. See on ver. 22 below. For the same Gr. verb, in the (same) middle voice, cp. Acts ix. 22; Rom. iv. 20; 2 Tim. ii. 1; and in the active voice, Phil. iv. 13; 1 Tim. i. 12; 2 Tim. iv. 17. The tense here is present, not aorist, and suggests rather the maintenance than the attainment of strength. Their "Strength" (see e.g. Psal. Iix. 17) was already and permanently theirs; let it be continuously used. — Cp. 1 Cor. xvi. 13 (where, however, "be strong" represents another Gr. word), and 1 Pet. v. 8 — 11, for close parallels to the thought and precept here. in the Lord] This phrase, or its strict equivalents, occurs about 35 times in the Epistle. — The whole secret of spiritual strength resides in union with "the Lord." "In Him," and there alone, is there "no condemnation" (Rom. viii. 1); "in Him" is the fountain of spiritual vitality, to be made our own, in practical efficacy, only as we "abide in Him" (Joh. xv. 4 — 7). And these two aspects of benefit "in Christ" constitute together the believer's cause of strength ; a strength the only alternative to which is spiritual impotence (Joh. xv. 5). 150 EPHESIANS, VI. [v. n. " power of his might. Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. and in the power &c] See i. 19 (and note there) for the same Gr. The Gr. rendered "might" tends to denote strength rather as substra tum or resource ; the Gr. rendered " power", rather as outcome or exer cise. We may paraphrase, "in the energy of Him the Strong." — The phrase defines, so to speak, that aspect of the Lord in Whom they were which was to be specially used in the great conflict. Elsewhere (1 Joh. v. 20) the prominent thought is, "We are in Him that is True," Veritable, Real. Here it is, "Ye are in Him that is Able." 11. Put on] For the word, cp. Rom. xiii. 12, 14 (a close parallel); 1 Cor. xv. 53, 54; 2 Cor. v. 3; Gal. iii. 27 (a parallel); above, iv. 24; below, 14; Col. iii. 10, 12; 1 Thess. v. 8 (a close parallel). In 1 Thess. and Rom. (just quoted) we have, so to speak, the germs of the develop ed imagery of this later- written passage. In them, as here, the believer, already (from another point of view, that of covenant and possession) clothed and armed with his Lord, is exhorted so to realize and to use what he has that it shall be like a new clothing and arming. tlu whole armour] One word in the Gr., panoplia. It occurs in N.T. elsewhere only Luke xi. 22 and here ver. 13. In the Apocry pha it is not infrequent. Cp. esp. Wisdom v. 17 &c, a very close parallel here as regards the picture: — "He (the Lord) shall take His zeal as a panoply, and make the creature His weapon for the defeat of His enemies ; He shall put on righteousness as a breastplate, and shall make true judgment His helmet ; He shall take sanctity as His invincible shield, and shall whet severe wrath as His sword, &c. " These words may very possibly have been in the Apostle's memory. But far more certainly he had present there Isai. Iix. 16, 17, itself the probable ground of the imagery in Wisdom. The word panoplia admits no doubt of a looser application in usage ; it may mean armour, complete or not. But its strict meaning, "whole armour," is precisely in point here, where the stress of thought is on the one secret of spiritual strength ; the need of Divine safeguard, and nothing less, for the whole emergency. Cp. again 1 Thess. v. and Rom. xiii. for parallels, or rather germs, of this passage. There, as here, the image of "putting on " is connected with that of "armour." And in Rom. distinctly, and in 1 Thess. im plicitly, the armour is seen to be reducible ultimately, as here, to the Lord Jesus Christ Himself. St Jerome says here, ' ' From what we read in the passage following, and from the things said in all the Scriptures concerning the Lord (our) Saviour, it most clearly results that by ' all the arms of God'. ..the Saviour is to be understood." of God] Supplied by Him, having been wrought by Him. For such a conflict nothing less will do than what is wholly His in origin and gift. that ye may be able] It is implied that thus, while only thus, the militant Christian shall be able. No inadequacy in his equipment is to be feared. v. 12.] EPHESIANS, VI. 151 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against 12 to stand] The key-word of the passage. The present picture is not of a march, or of an assault, but of the holding of the fortress of the soul and of the Church for tlie heavenly King. Bunyan's " Mr Stand fast" is a portrait that may illustrate this page. — So again below, w. 13, 14. wiles] Lit., "methods"; stratagems. The Gr. word occurs (in Scripture) only here and above, iv. 14 (where R.V. "wiles"). For the formidable fact of the deliberate and subtle plans of the great Enemy, carefully concealed but skilfully combined on weak points, cp. 2 Cor. ii. 11; 1 Pet. ii. 11, (where render "carry on a campaign against the soul "). In this respect, as in so many others, the Temptation of the Lord Himself is a picture of that of His followers ; a series of veiled attacks, upon points thought weak, by the most subtle of created intel lects. — In 1 Pet. v. 8 the same Enemy appears acting, as he sometimes does, in another way ; by violence and terror. the devil] See on ii. 2 for considerations on his personality as recog nized by St Paul. This designation (diabolos, accuser,) appears above, iv. 27, and elsewhere in St Paul, Acts xiii. 10; 1 Tim. iii. 6, 7, 2 Tim. ii. 26; besides Heb. ii. 14. It is frequent with St Matthew, St Luke, and St John. In the LXX. it is the regular equivalent, though not the precise translation, of the Heb. Sdtdn (the Adversary) ; e.g. Job i. — ii. ; Zech. iii. 1, 2. One of the terrible characteristics of the Adversary of the Son of God is the aim and effort to bring believing man into condemnation ; hence his accusations of the saints. Cp. the Book of Job especially, and Rev. xii. 10 (where, however, another word than diabolos is used). Nor let it be forgotten that his first assault on man (Gen. iii. 5) was made by means of accusation against God, as grudging a good gift to man. 12. we wrestle) Lit., our wrestling is. War and the games are associated in the language of 2 Tim. ii. 4 — 5. But here, as Ellicott observes, there need be no mingling of metaphors. War involves wrestling, in many a hand to hand encounter. — The Gr. word (pall, wrestling ) is found only here in Gr. literature, but is cognate to palcestra, and other familiar words. The Apostle takes it for granted that the Christian life is, from one point of view, essentially a conflict. "We" obviously, by context, means all Christians as such. Cp. 1 Cor. ix. 25, &c. But it is a conflict maintained, in Christ, with Divine power and from a dominating position. flesh and blood] Lit., " blood and flesh"; but English usage makes the other order better, as a rendering. The phrase occurs (in the opposite order of words) Matt. xvi. 17; 1 Cor. xv. 50; Gal. i. 16; Heb. ii. 14. It denotes (as 1 Cor. xv.) humanity in its present mortal conditions, or (other reff.) humanity simply. "Man," as now constituted, will not inherit the eternal kingdom; "man" did not illuminate St Peter; "man" did not teach the Gospel to St Paul; Christ so became "Man" as to be able to taste death. The thought here is not that we are not 152 EPHESIANS, VI. |v- I2- principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the wrestling with our bodily desires, or weaknesses, but that we are not wrestling with mere mortal men. True, they may be our ostensible and immediate enemies or obstacles, but behind them is the central force of evil in the spirit-world. See the language of Rev. ii. io, and Abp Trench's note upon it (Epistles to the Seven Churches, p. 104). It will be observed how forcible is the testimony of the Apostle here to the objective existence of the world of evil spirits. He not merely takes it for granted, but carefully distinguishes it from the world of humanity. See further, Appendix G. principalities... powers] Lit., the principalities, &c. See i. 21, iii. 10; and notes. Here, as Rom. viii. 38; Col. ii. 15; the ref. obvi ously is to personal evil spirits as members and leaders of an organized spirit-world. For allusions to such organization, under its head, cp. the visions ofthe Revelation, esp. xii. 7, 9. And cp. Matt. xxv. 41 ; 2 Cor. xii. 7. Note also the " Legion" of evil spirits (Mar. v. 9, 15; Luke viii. 30), compared with the " more than twelve Legions of (holy) angels", Matt. xxvi. 53. Great numbers and organized action are at once suggested by the military word ; a word used on both occasions with profound earnestness and appeal to fact. The leaders of the host of evil are alone mentioned here, and in the parallels, as are the leaders of the host of good in i. 21, &c. The "plebeian angels militant" (Par. Lost, X. 442), are taken for granted, represented in their chiefs. the rulers of the darkness of this world] Lit. as R. V., the world- rulers of this darkness. The words " of this world " (or rather "age") are probably an explanatory insertion. " This darkness" is the present order of things on earth, in its aspect as a. scene of sin. As such it is dark, with the shadows of delusion, woe, and death. See Luke xxii. 53 (a suggestive parallel) and other reff. under iv. 18. " The world-rulers " : — the context obviously points to personal evil spirits, exercising rule, in some real sense, over the world ; and the question is, what does the world (cosmos) mean here? See in reply ii. 2 and note. "The world" here, as very often in St John, and often in St Paul (esp. in 1 Cor.), denotes not the Universe, nor the earth and sea, but humanity as fallen an'd rebel. As such, it is the realm of these powers of evil. Their Head is the usurping, but permitted, Caesar of this empire, which is not so much local as moral; and his subordinate spirits are accordingly "imperial rulers" within it, for him. — The Gr. word (cosmocratbr) appears in Rabbinic literature, transliterated (see Ellicott here). It is used sometimes there as a mere magniloquent synonym for " king." But we may be sure of a more special meaning in a passage like this. For allusions to the mysterious "authority" of the Evil Power over the human "world," in its ethical aspect at least, cp. Luke iv. 6; Joh. xiv. 30, xvi. 11; 2 Cor. iv. 4; 1 Joh. v. 18. It has been asked whether this authority is connected with a previous lawful presi dency of the great Spirit now fallen, over this region of the Universe. v. I3-] EPHESIANS, VI. 153 darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, 13 that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having But "God knoweth " is the best answer to such enquiries, till the veil is lifted. The fact of the present authority is our chief concern ; and in this respect we are plainly warned that there is a real antagonism between the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of the Evil One, and that in both cases we have the phenomenon of a spiritual dominion expressing itself through human organization and institution. See further on ii. -i, above. spiritual wickedness in high places] Lit., the spiritual things of wickedness in the heavenly places. R. V. paraphrases "the spiritual hosts, &c. "; and this well gives the meaning. The idea is of beings and forces, spiritual as distinguished from material, be longing to and working for " wickedness." Wickedness is viewed as having its visible and invisible agents, and these are the invisible. "In the heavenly places" : — the fifth occurrence of the phrase in this Epistle (cp.~ i. 3, 20, ii. 6, iii. 10). The adjective occurs also Matt. xviii. 35; Joh. iii. 12; r Cor. xv. 40, 48, 49; Phil. ii. 10; 2 Tim. iv. 18; Heb. iii. 1, vi. 4, viii. 5, ix. 23, xi. 16, xii. 22. The connexion of it with anything evil is confined to this passage, and is confessedly startling. Of the several expositions offered, the oldest, given by St Jerome here, seems best to meet the case; that which interprets "heaven" as the large antithesis to "earth" (cp. Matt. vi. 26, "birds ofthe heaven"; &c), and "heavenly," accordingly, as " un-earthly," super-terrestrial, belonging to the region of things unseen and (in power) superior to man, of which the impalpable sky is the parable. See above on ii. 2, ' ' the authority of the air." The import of the words, then, is that we have to deal, in the combat of the soul and of the Church, with spiritual agents of evil occupying a sphere of action invisible and practically boundless. — In St Ignatius' Ep. to the Ephe sians, u. xiii., the same Gr. adjective is used, with an almost certainly similar reference. See Bp Lightfoot there (Ignatius, vol. ii. p. 66), and our Introduction, p. 28. 13. take unto you] Lit., take up, even as jEneas (if the illustration may be reverently offered) took up, and examined, and. girt on, the god-wrought panoply brought him by his Mother, on the verge of war (jEn. viii. 608, &c). The Divine armour, perfect, and perfectly ready, lies at the Christian's feet, and is his own. Let him, by the grace of God, appropriate it in act. withstand] See above on "stand," ver. 11. The verb here occurs in the same connexion, Jas. v. 6 ; 1 Pet. v. 9. See on the other hand Matt. v. 39, where perhaps render, "withstand not the Evil One," (represented by evil men). To the cruelty of the Enemy the believer meekly submits; his spiritual stratagems he withstands, in Christ. the evil day] The dark crisis of the campaign, whenever it may be. And this will practically mean any felt crisis of the soul's resistance. So in a familiar hymn : 154 EPHESIANS, VI. [v. 14. 14 done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteous- "[We] ask the aid of heavenly power To help us in the evil hour." The definite article in such a phrase does not isolate a solitary oc casion, but denotes distinct occasions of the one class in question. Some expositors see here a reference to the final conflict of the Church. But the whole passage is concerned with a present and normal "wrest ling" against present enemies. Cp. the words ch. v. 16, "the days are evil." having done] More precisely, the verb being compound, "having wrought out," "quite done." This compound verb is a common one with St Paul, however, and its special etymology must not be greatly pressed (see it, e.g. Rom. vii. 8, 13, 15, 17). Still, an intensity of meaning is in place in this context: "having accomplished all things, all things demanded for equipment and action." — The verb bears the meaning "to subdue," sometimes in the classics, and once or twice in LXX. ; but not in other N.T. passages. to stand] unmoved at your post, ready for the next assault of the unseen foe. It is important to bear in mind through the whole context that the central idea is fixity, not progress or conquest ; ideas of which Ihe Gospel is full7 but which are not present here. The scene is filled with the marshalled hosts of the Evil One, bent upon dislodging the soul, and the Church, from the one possible vantage-ground of life and power — union and communion with their Lord. 14. ^ Standi See last note. Here, as throughout the passage, the tense of this verb is aorist. A decisive act of taking a conscious stand, or a succession of stlch acts, is implied. having your loins girt) Lit. , and far better, having girded your loins (R. V.). The girding is the own act, by grace, of the regenerate will. " Your loins" : — cp. Exod. xii. n; Job xxxviii. 3, xl. 7; Psal. xviii. 39; Isai. xi. 5; Luke xii. 35; 1 Pet. i. 13. The well-fastened girdle kept together the soldier's dress and accoutrements, and added con scious vigour to his frame. with truth] Lit., "in truth"; and the "in" may very possibly keep its direct meaning; for the girded body is within the girdle. But this meaning would be conveyed in English by "with." "Truth": — not "the truth" ; a phrase which would decisively mean "the trueVnessage ofthe Gospel." The absence of the article leaves us free to Igxplain the WQti-flfJhe sincerity, reality, andjjimpljcity of the regeneraEeTrran! For this use bf The' word in~St i'aul lee e.g. 1 Cor. v. 8; 2 Cor. vii. 14, xi. 10; above, ch. v. 9; Phil. i. 18. The grasp on revealed Truth is indeed all-important, but it must be made "in truth," in personal sincerity, if it is to avail in the spiritual struggle. And this meaning of the word well corresponds to the imagery. Un reality, whether in trust or self-surrender, is fatal to the coherence of the Christian life. Meanwhile it must be remembered that the "panoply" v. I5-] EPHESIANS, VI. 155 ness ; and your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel 15 is "of God," and that "truth" ishereT accordingly, a supernaturaLgrace. that simplicity of attitude and action towards God, His word and His will, which is a gift of regeneration alone. — In Isai. xi. 5 "righteous ness" and "faithfulness" are Messiah's girdle. having on] Lit., and far better, having put on; the same verb as ver. 1 1 . The tense is aorist. The believer is summoned to a decisive renewal of his exercise of grace. the breastplate] Cp. Isai. Iix. 17; I Thess. v. 8. And see note above on ver. 11 for the apocryphal parallel. — The breastplate covers the heart. Here the heart in its figurative and spiritual sense (see on i. 18, iii. 17) is in question ; how to protect it and its action, in the great con flict. righteousness] Cp. 2 Cor. vi. 7. — One leading explanation of this word here is Chrigrs Righteousness as our Justification. According to this, the warrior is to oppose the Divine fact of Jehovah Tsidkenu (Jer. xxiii. 6; ep. Rom. iii., iv; Phil, ii.) to the strategy ofthe Accuser (Rom. viii. 33s 34). But this class of truth falls rather under the figures of the shoes and the shield (see below). Here (in view esp. of Isai. Iix. 17, where "righteousness" is Jehovah's breastplate), it is Jjetter to explain it of the believer's personal righteousness, i.e. his /loyalty in principle and action to the_holy Liw of G,°d.- For clear cases "of this meaning ol the wora ^ne root-meaning with reference to all others) in St Paul, cp. Rom. vi. 13, xiv. 17; 2 Cor. vi. 14, ix. 9, 10; above, iv. 24, v. 9 ; Phil. i. 11; 1 Tim. vi. 11; and see Tit. ii. 12. The idea is closely kindred to that of "truth," just considered. But it is strictly defined by the correlative idea of Law. The believer is armed at the heart against the Tempter by definite and supreme rever ence for the Law, the revealed preceptive Will of God. So Daniel was armed (Dan. i., vi.), and the Three (Dan. iii.). Here, as under the word "truth," remember that the armour is "of God." See note on "truth," above. In 1 Thess. v. 8 the breastplate is "faith and love." There is no discrepancy in the difference. Loyalty to the Divine Law is inseparably connected with trust in the word of God and love of His will. 15. your feet shod] Lit., and better, having shod your feet. See note above, on "having on." — If the warrior is to "stand" he must have no unprotected and uncertain foot-hold. the preparation] The Gr. word occurs here only in N.T. In the LXX. it occurs several times, and tends, curiously, to denote equipment in the special form of base or pedestal (e.g. Ezra iii. 3; A.V. "bases"). Such a meaning is obviously in point here, where the imagery suggests not readiness to run, but foothold for standing. Equipment will be a fair rendering. the gospel of peace] Cp. Isai. Iii. J; Nahum i. 15; and the quotation, Rom. x. 15. Those passages are closely linked to this by the concur rence in them ofthe words "feet" and "message of peace." But in them the imagery distinctly suggests movement, message-bearing ; in this, as 156 EPHESIANS, VI. [v. 16. «6 of peace ; above all, taking the .shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. distinctly, steadfastness in personal spiritual warfare. Here, accord ingly, we interpret "the Gospel, the glad message, of peace," to mean the Divine revelation of peace as heard and welcomed by the Christian for himself. See above, ii. 17 (and note), where the words "Gospel" (in the Gr.) and "peace" also concur; and, for other mentions of the Gospel message and work in the Epistle, i. 13, iii. 6, 8, and below ver. 19. The paradox here, "peace" as part of the panoply of the holy war, is as significant as it is beautiful. The warrior's foothold needs to be settled, sure, and restful, just in proportion to the stress around him. "Peace with God" (Rom. v. 1), the peace of justification, and its holy sequel and accompaniment, "the peace of God, keeping the heart and thoughts in Christ Jesus" (Phil. iv. 7), are just then most necessary to the saint's spirit, and most real to his consciousness, when put to the proof "in the evil day." Christ, in Himself, is the Rock of vantage; a clear view and personal hold of Him revealed is the secret of a true foothold upon Him. — The Apostle himself stood in this strength when he wrote, "I know Whom I have believed, &c." (2 Tim. i. 12). 16. above all] The Gr. admits the renderings, "over all things"; "besides all things"; "on occasion of all things, (on all occasions)"; "against all things." We incline to this last, as suitable to the imagery of the shield shifted to meet any and every stroke. — Another reading gives "in all things"; at every turn ofthe conflict. But the evidence is far from conclusive. "It has not sufficient external support, and may have been a correction for the ambiguous [preposition in the text]" (Ellicott). taking) Lit., having taken up. See note on ver. 13 above. the shield] The Gr. is one of two familiar words for "shield," and denotes a large oblong shield (such as that used by the heavy Roman infantry) about 2^x4 feet in size. (See Smith's Diet. Class. Ant., under the word Scutum). The significance of the choice of word is obvious. In the parallel apocryphal passage (see note on ver. 11 above) the Gr. word for "shield" is the other alternative, denoting a circular and lighter shield. But this is no proof (as some expositors have thought) that the present word was not deliberately chosen, in a passage like this, where the idea of protection, and the need of it, is pressed to the utmost. faith] "That faith whereby we resolutely rely on God and His word for deliverance from temptation" (Monod). The true safe guard in the evil day lies ever, not in introspection, but in that look wholly outward, Godward, which is the essence of faith (see Psal. xxv. 15). wherewith] Lit. , and perhaps better, in this vivid picture, In which. ye shall be able) Observe the certainty of the promise, good for the whole future of the conflict. to quench] before the soul's living frame, so to speak, is reached and burned. — It may be, and very often is, impossible for the Christian v. 17.] EPHESIANS, VI. 157 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the 17 to detect the point where temptation passes into sin; a fact which should secure humble caution in all language about personal spiritual victory. But this verse warrants the reverent expectation of very true victories in the real exercise of enlightened and simple faith. The word ' ' all" is important. the fiery darts] Lit., "the darts, the ignited darts." The metaphor is taken from the fire-arrows of ancient warfare. Wetstein here gives abundant illustration, from Thucydides, Livy, Vegetius, Ammianus, and many other authors. Ammianus (about A.D. 380) describes the Roman malleoli as arrows carrying a perforated bulb, like a distaff, just below the point ; the bulb filled with burning matter ; the arrow discharged from a slack bow, lest speed should kill the flame. Another variety was simpler; the shaft near the point was wrapped in burn ing tow. The imagery is sternly true to the experience of injections into the soul of polluting ideas, or of doubts of God, or of unchastened anger. the wicked] I.e., as R.V., the Evil One ; the great General of the besieging host. 17. take] Lit., receive, as from the hands of Another, who presents it to all His soldiers. the helmet] Cp. Isai. lix. 17; 1 Thess. v. 8. See also Psal. cxi. 7. The head needs protection not only as a vital part, but as the seat of sight. The believer "looks up, and lifts up his head, as his redemp tion draweth nigh" (Luke xxi. 28). salvation] The Gr. is not the common word so rendered, sbtlria, (which is used 1 Thess. v. 8), but sbterion, which occurs Luke ii. 30, iii. 6 ; Acts xxviii. 28. It is frequent in the LXX. ; occurring e.g. Psal. li. (LXX. 1.) 12, xci. (LXX. xc.) 16; Isai. xxvi. 1, lix. 17, lxi. 10. If the difference between the two forms is to be pressed, it may be sug gested that sbterion tends to denote "salvation" (deliverance from judgment and sin) as it is in the Divine Person who saves; sbthia, "salvation" as it is applied and received. But the difference often vanishes. In Isai. lix. the Divine Warrior wears this helmet ; doubtless in the sense of His being the Worker of deliverance, clothed and armed, as it were, with His great purpose. The Christian warrior here wears it in the sense of his being the receiver and possessor of deliverance, clothed and armed in the victory of his Head. In 1 Thess. v. " the hope of salvation " is the helmet : the sure prospect of the final and absolute deliverance (cp. Rom. xiii. 11), a deliverance of which the present peace and victory of faith is but the outline or prelude, "covers the head" of the soldier. The two passages supplement each other ; the hope is based on the actual possession of the thing in its present phase ; the sense of possession is vivified by the hope. the sword) The one offensive weapon in the picture. The fight is stationary and defensive, but it continually requires the thrust and cut of the defender. The assailant is himself to be assailed ; the accusing 158 EPHESIANS, VI. [v. 18. 18 Spirit, which is the word of God : praying always with all tempter to be silenced. Cp. Heb. iv. 12 for the only other N.T. passage where the "sword" appears in spiritual imagery. There, as well as here, the "Word" is the sword-like thing. In the O.T., cp. Psal. lxiv. 3; Isai. xlix. 2. of the Spirit] The great Conveyer of the " word of God," as the Inspirer of the Prophets, under both O.T. and N.T. (above iii. 5; Heb. iii. 7, ix. 8, x. 15; 1 Pet. i. 11; 2 Pet. i. 21) Thus the sword is of His forging ; and as He works in the believer as the Spirit of truth (Joh. xiv. 17), and faith (2 Cor. iv. 13), He puts the sword into his grasp and enables him to use it. See next note. the word of God] The sure utterance of Revealed Truth. The Gr. word (as in ch. v. 26, where see note,) is not logos but rhhna. Doubtless the reference is not to be limited to the very words of Scripture ; for true conclusions from them, in the Creeds for example, are "utterances" of Divine truth. But the evidence of Scripture itself, as it indicates histori cally the principles and practice of the Lord and the Apostles in regard of the Written Word, is altogether in favour of interpreting the phrase here, as to its main and permanent meaning, of the believing use, in spiritual conflict, of the Scriptures ; the Written Word, revealing the Living Word. It is true that when this Epistle was written, the Spirit, Whose work in producing Scripture was still in progress, was also speaking direct to the Church in other modes (see e.g. Acts xi. 28 ; 1 Cor. xiv. ; &c.). But that this was a great passing phase of the Church's experience is indicated by 1 Cor. xiii. 8, and by the broad facts of history. And meanwhile both Christ and the Apostles appeal to the Written Word for proof and certainty in a manner altogether peculiar, and which calls for the close personal study of the Christian disciple. Above all, observe that the Lord Himself, in His Temptation, the history of which should be compared carefully with this whole passage, uses exclusively verbal citations, written "utterances," from the Scrip tures, as His sword ; and this immediately after His Baptism and the Descent of the Holy Spirit (Matt. iii. 16 — iv. n; Luke iv. 1 — 13). No suggestion could be more pregnant than this as to the abiding posi tion of the Written Word under the Dispensation of the Spirit. With this verse the imagery of the passage gives way to unfigurative spiritual precepts. The writer is careless of literary symmetry, in favour of a higher order and beauty. 18. praying always] Lit., praying on every occasion, every inci dent of life, especially every incident of temptation. Cp. the yet broader and deeper precept, 1 Thess. v. 17, "pray without intermission." See too Luke xviii. 1; Phil. iv. 6; Col. i. 3, 9, iv. 2. The attitude of the believer's mind is to be one of perpetual prayer, in the sense of continuously maintaining a trustful and humble reference of all parts of life to his Lord's will and grace. This will express itself in acts, if only momentary and wholly internal acts, of adoration and petition at each felt crisis of need. See Heb. iv. 16. with] Lit., by means of; the expressions being the instruments of the spiritual state. v. I9-] EPHESIANS, VI. 159 prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching there unto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints ; and for me, that utterance may be given unto me, that I may 19 all prayer and supplication] "All:" — every variety ; deliberate, ejacu- latory ; public, private, secret ; confessing, asking, praising. Or again, more simply, with a full, not partial and niggardly, employment of the privilege and resource of prayer. "Prayer" is the larger word, "supplication" the more definite. The former includes the whole attitude and action of the creature's approach to God; the latter denotes only petition. "Prayer," however, is very often used in this narrower sense. See out of many passages Matt. v. 44; Luke xxii. 40. — The two words occur together, as here, Phil. iv. 6; 1 Tim. ii. i, v. 5. in tlie Spirit] So also R. V. Lit., "in spirit;" but see last note on ii. 22 above. — The Holy Spirit was to be "the Place" of the prayer, in the sense of being the surrounding, penetrating, transforming atmo sphere of the spirit of the praying Christian. Cp. Zech. xii. 10; Rom. viii. 26; Jude 20. watching] Keeping awake. The Gr. word occurs also Mark xiii. 33; Luke xxi. 36; Heb. xiii. 17. There was to be no indolent, som nolent oblivion of the need of prayer, or of the fact of offered prayer. For similar precepts (with another Gr. word) see Matt. xxvi. 41 ; Col. iv. 2 ; 1 Pet. iv. 7. with all perseverance] Lit., in (as R. V.). — "All:" — that is, "full," "utmost;" so "all faith" (1 Cor. xiii. 2). — For a close parallel to the thought see Rom. xii. 12 ; where lit., "in the (matter of) prayer, persevering." Our Lord's parable (Luke xviii. 1, &c.), makes it plain that persistency as well as trust has a mysterious value in the efficacy of prayer. supplication] "All supplication;" the "all" being implied from the previous words. "All:" — with the full particularity and thoughtfulness proper to faithful intercessions. for all saints] Lit., for all the saints. With a noble abruptness the thought, long detained upon the combat and resources of the individual, and of the single community, now runs out to the great circle of the Church. The inner connexion of ideas is close and strong. The Chris tian cannot really arm himself with Christ, and use his armour, with out getting nearer in sympathy to the brotherhood of the saints of Christ. Cp. 1 Pet. v. 9 for the same connexion otherwise indicated. "Saints:" — see on i. 1 above. 19. for me] Lit., on behalf of me. This change of phrase, by change of preposition , is perhaps due to the Apostle's strong personal sense of his need of the help of intercessory prayer. — He wisely covets for his apostolic work the prayers of the obscurest militant believer. Cp. Rom. xv. 30 ; 2 Cor. i. 1 1 ; Phil. i. 19 ; Col. iv. 3 ; 2 Thess. iii. 1 ; Philem. 22; Heb. xiii. 18. utterance] Lit., "word" (logos; Latin versions, sermo); a special deliverance of the Gospel. Cp. 1 Cor. i. 5. 160 EPHESIANS, VI. [v. 20. open my mouth boldly, to make known the mystery of the 20 gospel, for which I am an ambassador in bonds : that therein I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak. given] by the inspiring and enabling Spirit. Cp. Acts ii. 4 ; 1 Cor. xii. 8. The Apostle was still as entirely dependent on the heavenly Gift as when his work began. that I may open]- Lit., "in opening of." "In" such "opening," as opportunity came by God's providence, and power came by His grace, the "gift" would be seen. boldly] Lit., in boldness of speech. The Gr. word has occurred iii. 12, where see note. Cp. Phil. i. 20. St Paul was not insensible to the difficulty of a full and open utterance of the Gospel, not least in the Capital of the world. Cp. Rom. i. 15, 16, and notes in this Series. the mystery] The sixth occurrence of the word in the Epistle ; cp. i. 9, iii. 3, 4, 9, v. 32. On the meaning, see on i. 9. The special refer ence here is fixed by the previous occurrences ; it is to Divine Redemp tion in its world-wide scope and eternal issues. Cp. 1 Tim. iii. 16. 20. for which] On behalf of which, in the interests of which. The Gospel is, so to speak, the Power whose envoy he is. Cp. 2 Cor. v. 20 for the same phrase and image with express mention of the Sovereign, Christ, represented by His envoys. an ambassador] Cp. 2 Cor. just quoted. And see Philem. 8, where Bp Lightfoot renders (and so R.V. margin) "an ambassador, and now also a prisoner, of Jesus Christ;" giving this passage, so closely parallel and exactly contemporary, as a main reason for the rendering. See his note there. This is not the place to discuss the question. in bonds] Lit., in a chain. The Gr. word occurs elsewhere in St Paul's speech or writings, Acts xxviii. 20; 2 Tim. i. 16. — Prisoners detained upon appeal to the Emperor, as was St Paul, were sometimes ' ' coupled by a slight chain round the right wrist to the left of a soldier, and, thus shackled. . .if they could afford it, were at liberty to hire a lodg ing for themselves without the walls, but within the prescribed limits" (Lewin, Life, &r>c.,of St Paul,ii. 236. See too Bp Lightfoot, Philippians, p. 8). Cp. Josephus, Antiquities, xviii. u. 6, for similar custody (though not upon appeal) in the case of Agrippa, the Herod of Acts xii., in his earlier life in Italy in the reign of Tiberius. For St Paul's allusions to the "bonds" of this Roman imprisonment, see Phil. i. 7, 13, 14, 16; Col. iv. 18; Philem. 10, 13; and above, iii. 1, iv. 1. Wetstein calls attention here to the paradox; "an ambassador in chains." therein] I.e., in "the mystery of the Gospel." This was the field or sphere of his speech. The Gr. makes it plain that the reference is to this, and not to the "bonds." speak boldly] The verb is cognate to the noun in ver. 19. See note above on "boldly" there. The tense is aorist, and suggests that he prays for grace to take, as it were, a "new departure" in outspoken testimony and exposition. v. 21.] EPHESIANS, VI. 161 But that ye also may know my affairs, and how I do, 21 Tychicus, a beloved brother and faithful minister in the / ought] under the holy obligation of my commission. Cp. 1 Cor. ix. 16. speak] The Gr. verb indicates specially the wording of the message. He prays for grace to be perfectly explicit in terms. — The tense is aorist; see last note but one. 21 — 22. The mission of Tychicus. 21. ye also] as well as my other friends, near or distant. Perhaps the emphasis has to do with Col. iv. 7 , words written so nearly at the same time : Ephesus as well as Colossae should be kept informed. This, how ever, opens the question (not to be discussed here) which Epistle was first written, this or the Colossian. my affairs] Lit., the things concerning me. So Phil. i. 12; Col. iv. 7. The phrase is common in later classical Greek. — Omit " and", supplied by A. V. after these words. how I do] Lit., "what J. do." But Gr. usage confirms the render ing of A.V. and R. V. The "doing" is faring; exactly as in the English phrase. Tychicus] Named elsewhere, Acts xx. 4; Col. iv. 7; 2 Tim. iv. 12; Tit. iii. 1 2. An examination of these passages and their surroundings shews that Tychicus belonged to the province of Asia, and makes it likely that he was an Ephesian. His character is drawn in noble outlines here and in Col. We see in him one who attracted the Apostle's love and reliance, in the fellowship of Christ, in a high degree; and the words in 2 Tim. shew that his faithful readiness for service was maintained into the last trying days of St Paul's life. — It is suggested that Tychicus, and his brother Asian, Trophimus, were the two "brethren" associated with Titus in the management of the collection (2 Cor. viii. 16 — 24) for the poor Christians in Judea. — Tradition makes Tychicus afterwards bishop of Chalcedon in Bithynia, or of Colophon, or of Neapolis in Cyprus. See the art. Tychicus in Smith's Diet, ofthe Bible; Ellicott here; and Lightfoot on Col. iv. 7, and p. 1 1 of his Philippians. Lightfoot shews that the name Tychicus, though not common, occurs in inscriptions and on coins belonging to Asia Minor. This is the one individual personal allusion in the Epistle. u beloved brother] Lit., and better, the, &c. The allusion is to a person well-defined by acquaintance. On the word "brother" see below, on ver. 23. minister) Gr. diaconos : so in Col. iv. 7. See on iii. 7 above for the essential meaning of the word. In this passage, as in Col., the pro bable reference is to the activities of Tychicus as St Paul's helper. Cp. Col. i. 7 for the word in a similar connexion. In Phil. i. 1 ; 1 Tim. iii. 8, 12, iv. 6; the word is used to denote holders of a subordinate office in the Christian ministry. And cp. Rom. xvi. 1, where it is used of a Christian woman holding a recognized position in the work of 162 EPHESIANS, VI. [vv. 22, 23. 22 Lord, shall make known to you all things: whom I have sent unto you for the same purpose, that ye might know 23 our affairs, and that he might comfort your hearts. Peace be to the brethren, and love with faith, from God the Father the Church. Here, however, such a meaning is unlikely, the person being of a calibre, and in a connexion with the Apostle, which do not suggest an inferior grade of work. In no passages of the N.T. save Rom., Phil., and 1 Tim., quoted above, has the word diaconos any necessary connexion at all with organized ministry as such. E. g. in Joh. ii. 5, 9, it denotes a "servant" in the commonest sense; in Rom. xiii. 4, a "servant" of God in civil magistracy; in 2 Cor. iii. 6, a " servant " of the New Covenant, as an active agent in its promul gation. In Rom. xv. 8; Gal. ii. 17; it is used ofthe Lord Himself. in the Lord] The last occurrence in the Epistle of this sacred and pregnant phrase. The life, and the life-work, of Tychicus were altogether conditioned, characterized, and animated, by his union with Christ, and the people of Christ. 22. I have sent] Lit., " I did send." The aorist is "epistolary"; it speaks from the time of the arrival, not the sending, of the mes senger. Cp. 2 Cor. viii. 18, 22; Phil. ii. 28; Col. iv. 8 (where see Lightfoot's note); Philem. 12, &c. our affairs] The circumstances of St Paul and his fellow Christians at Rome. There are passages (see esp. 1 Thess. iii. 1, 2) where he obviously uses "we" in the sense of "I''; but this is not likely here, in view of the "how /do," just before (ver. 22). comfort) The word is rendered "beseech," iv. i, above, where see note. By derivation and usage it has more in it of exhortation than consolation; though the two ideas run often into one another. "Com fort " by derivation (confortalio) means rightly, " strengthening." If this is borne in mind, the A. V. gives a true interpretation. your hearts) See, for collocation of the words "heart " and "com fort," Col. ii. 2, iv. 8; 2 Thess. ii. 17. 23 — 24. Benediction. 23. Peace] The Apostle returns to his opening benedictory prayer. See on i. 2 and note. — We may remark here that the phrase "Grace and peace," in apostolic salutations, though no doubt connected with ordinary Greek and Hebrew greetings, is not to be explained by them. Both nouns are surely used in the fulness of their Christian meaning. It is "the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ ; " " the peace of God." the brethren] The only certain occurrence in this Epistle (see note on ver. 10 above) of this word in the plural. In the singular it has occurred once, ver. 21. As children of God, Christians are brothers of one another in a sense full of Divine life and love. See Rom. viii. 29; 1 Joh. v. 1. love] The Divine gift of love in all its aspects. He prays that "the love of God may be poured out in their hearts" (Rom. v. 5), v. 24.] EPHESIANS, VI. 163 and the Lord Jesus Christ. Grace be with all them that .M love our Lord Jesus Christ in sincerity. Amen. 1T Written from Rome unto the Ephesians by Tychicus. and that they may "walk in love" (above, ch. v. 2) as its result. For the word "love" in benediction or salutation, cp. 2 Cor. xiii. 11; Jude 2. with faith] As if to secure the reality and purity of the experience of love by its co-existence with faith, holy reliance, in God through Christ by the Spirit. Here "faith," as well as "love" and "peace," is invoked upon them ; it is a "gift of God. " See on ii. 8 above. from God the Father] Cp. i. 2, and notes. There "our Father" is the wording. For the present phrase, cp. 2 Tim. i. 2 ; Tit. i. 4. The probable reference of the word " Father " in such an invocation (having regard to the far more frequent other form) is to the Father's Father hood as towards the brethren of His Son, rather than directly towards His Son. But the two aspects are eternally and indissolubly united. and the Lord Jesus Christ] See on i. 2. 24. Grace] Lit., "the grace." So in the closing benedictions of Col., 1 Tim., 2 Tim., Tit., Heb. In Rom., Cor., Gal., Phil., Thess., Philem., Rev., the benedictions are in the full form (or nearly so), "the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ." The shorter form is very probably the epitome of the larger; "the grace" is His grace. On the word "grace, see note on i. 2. It is nothing less than God Himself in action, in His Son, by His Spirit, in the salvation of man. with all them that love, &c] In this short clause, at once so broad and so deep in its reference, so exclusive from one point of view, so inclusive from another, we find the last expression of those great ideas of the Epistle, the local Universality and spiritual Unity of the true, the truly believing and loving, Church. All who answer this description are, as a fact, in contact with the Fountain of Grace, and on all of them the Apostle invokes "grace for grace" (Joh. i. 16), the successive and growing supplies of the gift of God. " Our Lord Jesus Christ " : — the full name and style of the Object of love is given. In this lies the needful warning that the Object must be no creature of the individual's, or of the community's, thought, but the Redeemer and King of history and revelation. in sincerity] Lit., (as R.V.,) in uncorruptness. The word is the same as that in Rom. ii. 7 (A.V., "immortality"); 1 Cor. xv. 42, 50, 53, 54 (A.V., "incorruption"); 2 Tim. i. 10 (A.V., "immortality"). The cognate adjective occurs Rom. i. 23: 1 Cor. ix. 25, xv. 52; 1 Pet. i. 4, 23 (A. V., in each case, "incorruptible" and so, practically, 1 Pet. iii. 4); and 1 Tim. i. 17 (A.V., "immortal")1. Thus the word tends always towards the spiritual and eternal, as towards that which is in its own nature free from elements of decay. "In spiritual reality" would thus 1 The Genevan English Version (1557) renders the words in the text here, "to their intmortalitie." The preposition ("to ) cannot stand, but the noun conveys part of the true meaning. II— 2 164 EPHESIANS, VI. [v. 24. represent a part, but only a part, of the idea of the present phrase. The whole idea is far greater in its scope. The "love of our Lord Jesus Christ" in question here is a love living and moving "in" the sphere and air, so to speak, of that which cannot die, and cannot let die. God Himself is its "environment," as He lives and works in the regenerate soul. It is a love which comes from, exists by, and leads to, the unseen and eternal. "Thus only," in Alford's words, "is the word worthy to stand as the crown and climax of this glorious Epistle." Amen] See note on iii. 21, above. — The evidence for the omission of the word here is considerable, though not overwhelming. The early Versions, and the Fathers (in quotation), retain it, almost without exception in both cases. Some very important MSS. omit it. — What reader will not supply it from his own spirit? The Subscription. Written from Rome, &c] Lit., (The Epistle) to (the) Ephesians w-as written from Borne, by means of Tychicus. — It may safely be assumed that no such Subscription appeared in the original MS. of the Epistle, and the question of various forms has, accordingly, an anti quarian interest only. In the oldest Gr. MSS. the form is the same as that of the Title (see note there); To (the) Ephesians. Old, but later, MSS., along with some early Versions and some Fathers, read, exactly or nearly, as the A.V. Among other forms we find, (Here) ends (the Epistle) to (the) Ephesians, (and) begins (that) to (the) Colossians (sic), or, that to (the) Philippians. The Subscriptions (to St Paul's Epistles) in their longer form (as in the A.V.) are ascribed to Euthalius, a bishop of the fifth century, and thus to a date later than that of the earliest known MSS. (See Scrivener's Introduction lo the Criticism ofthe N. T, ed. 1883, p. 62.) The Subscription here is obviously true to fact, (assuming the light ness ofthe words " at Ephesus" i. 1). In this it resembles those ap pended to Rom., Phil., 2 Tim. Other Subscriptions are either (1 Cor.; Galat. ; 1 Tim.) contradictory to the contents of the respective Epistles, or (Thess. ; Titus) difficult to be reconciled with them. Additional Note (see p. 54). The Rev. C. T. Wilson, M.A., of Jerusalem, has favoured the Editor with the following remarks : "The word ippafiwv occurs in the colloquial Arabic of Palestine, in the form arraboon, and is frequently used. ..for the sum of money paid in advance to a tradesman or artizan to seal a bargain. It is also used to signify a sum deposited as a pledge for the fulfilment of a bargain. When engaging a muleteer, it is usual to take a small sum from him as a pledge that he will be forthcoming at the appointed time. The arra boon is forfeited if he fails. " APPENDICES. PAGE A. Headship of Christ (Ch. i. io) 165 13. St Augustine on the Church (Ch. i. 22) 166 C. Original Sin (Ch. ii. 3) 166 D. "Without God "(Ch. ii. 12).... 167 E. The Unsearchable Riches of Christ (Ch. iii. 8) 167 Apostles and Prophets (Ch. ii. 20) 168 The Conflict with personal Evil Spirits (Ch. vi. 12) '. 170 O.T. Quotations and References 170 Christology of Ihe Epistle 171 A. HEADSHIP OF CHRIST WITH RELATION TO THE UNIVERSE. In the Commentary, on ch. i. 10, we have advocated the restriction of the reference of the Headship to the Lord's connexion with the Church. This is by no means to ignore His connexion with the whole created Universe; a truth expressly taught in the Holy Scriptures (see esp. Joh. i. 3, and Col. i. 16, though the latter passage makes its main reference to personal existences, not to merely material things). The connexion of the Eternal and Incarnate Son with the created World is indicated to us, directly and indirectly, as a profound and manifold connexion. But on a careful view of the whole teaching of the Ephesian Epistle we think it will be seen that the Epistle does not, so to speak, look this way with its revelations and doctrines, but is occupied su premely with the Lord's relations with His Church, and with other intelligent existences through it. And we doubt whether the imagery of the Head is anywhere (if not here) to be found used with reference to the Universe at large, material and immaterial alike. 165 APPENDICES. B. ST AUGUSTINE ON THE CHURCH. (Ch. I. 22.) He is describing with general approval Tichonius' Book of the Seven Rules1 (for the elucidation of Scripture mysteries), and writes thus (De Doctrind Christiand, III. 32): — "The second Rule is that concerning the Lord's twofold Body (de Domini corpore bipartito). The phrase is unsuitable, for that is not really the Lord's Body which will not be with Him eternally. He should have said, 'concerning the Lord's true and commingled Body, ' or ' true and feigned Body, ' or the like ; for not only eternally, but now, hypocrites are not to be described as being with Him, however they may seem (quamvis videanlur) to be in His Church. This rule demands a watchful reader ; for [often] the Scripture, turning from one party to speak to, or about, another, seems to be still speaking to, or about, the first, as if the two constituted one Body, by reason of their temporal commingling and their equal share in sacraments. " In allusion to this passage Bp Ridley writes (Works, Parker Society Ed., pp. 126 — 127): — "That Church, which is His Body, and of which Christ is the Head, standeth only of living stones and true Christians, not only outwardly in name and title, but inwardly in heart and id truth. But forasmuch as this Church. ..as touching the outward fellow ship, is contained within that great house [2 Tim. ii. 20] and hath, with the same, outward society of the sacraments and ministry of the word, many things are spoken of that universal Church (which St Augustine calleth the mingled Church) which cannot truly be understood but only of that purer part of the Church. So that the rule of Tyconius concerning the mingled Church may here well take place, &c." C. ORIGINAL SIN. (Ch. II. 3.) The theological literature, ancient and modern, of this great subject (the title of which we owe to St Augustine), is very extensive. The English reader will find information in Commentaries on the XXXIX Articles, such as those of Bps Beveridge and E. H. Browne. Art. ix deals expressly with the subject, and its statements underlie those of several following Articles, especially x, xi, xiii, xv, xvii. Among English discussions of the subject we specially recommend three of the late Prof. Mozley's Lectures (one of which is quoted in the notes); " Christ alone without Sin," "Original Sin," and "Original 1 This book is extant. See Migne's Pairologia Latina, Vol. xvm. APPENDICES. 167 Sin asserted by Philosophers and Poets." To the quotations given in this last Essay we may add the lines of Mr Browning : "I still, to suppose it" [the Christian faith] "true, for my part, See reasons and reasons; this, to begin; 'Tis the faith that launched point-blank her dart At the head of a lie — taught Original Sin, The Corruption of Man's Heart." Gold Hair; a story of Pornic. See, for some admirable pages on Original Sin, Prof. Shedd's Sermons to the Natural Man, especially Sermons v. and xiv. On the Pelagian Controversy, see Hagenbach's Dogmengeschichte, or English Translation (History of Doctrines), 2nd Period, B., i. 2 ; Shedd's Hist, of Christian Doctrine, Book IV. ch. iv. ; Cunningham's Historical Theology, Vol. I. ch. xi. A popular but able account of the controversy is given in Milner's History ofthe Ch. of Christ, Cent. 5, cch. iii., iv. D. "WITHOUT GOD." (Ch. II. 12.) " The vulgar believed in many Gods, the philosopher believed in a Universal Cause ; but neither believed in God. The philosopher only regarded the Universal Cause as the spring of the Universal machine, which was necessary to the working of all the parts, but was not thereby raised to a separate order of being from them. Theism was discussed as a philosophical not as a religious question, ...as no more affecting practice than any great scientific hypothesis does now... No thing would have astonished [the philosopher] more than, when he had proved in his lecture hall the existence of a God, to have been told to worship Him. ' Worship whom ?' he would have exclaimed, ' worship what? worship how ?' " Mozley, Lectures on Miracles, Lect. iv. E. THE UNSEARCHABLE RICHES OF CHRIST. (Ch. III. 8.) The following passage, referred to in the notes, is extracted from "A Sermon preached in the Parish Church of St Paul's, Deptford, on Sunday, May 7, 1786, on the lamented occasion of the death of Richard Conyers, LL.D., late Rector of that Parish," by the Rev. John Newton. "When he entered upon his ministry at his beloved Helmsley, in Yorkshire, he found the place ignorant and dissolute to a proverb... With much zeal and diligence, he attempted the reformation of his parish, which was of great extent and divided into several hamlets. He 168 APPENDICES. preached frequently in them all. He encouraged his parishioners to come to his house. He distributed them into little companies, that he might instruct them with more convenience ; he met them in rotation by appointment. In this manner... I have been assured that he often preached or exhorted, publicly or more privately, twenty times in a week. These labours were not in vain; a great, visible, and almost universal reformation took place. About the time I am speaking of, a clergyman in his neighbourhood made very honourable mention of Mr Conyers, in a letter to the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge (which I have seen in print), as perhaps the most exemplary, indefatig able and successful, parochial minister in the kingdom. Yet, in the midst of applause and apparent success, he was far from being satisfied with himself. He did what he could ; he did more than most others ; but he felt there was something still wanting, though for a time he knew not what; but he was desirous to know. He studied the Scrip tures, and he prayed to the Father of lights. They who thus seek shall surely find. Important consequences often follow from a sudden, in voluntary turn of thought. One day an expression of St Paul's, 'the unsearchable riches of Christ ' (Eph. iii. 8), engaged his attention. He had often read the passage, but never noticed the word 'unsearchable' before. The Gospel, in his view of it, had appeared plain and within his comprehension ; but the Apostle spoke of it as containing something that was 'unsearchable.' A conclusion, therefore forced itself upon him that the idea he had hitherto affixed to the word ' Gospel,' could not be the same with that ofthe Apostle. ...Thus he was brought, with the Apostle, to account his former gain but loss. The 'unsearchable riches of Christ' opened to his mind; he received power to believe; his perplexities were removed, and he 'rejoiced with joy unspeakable and full of glory. '...He, from that time, preached Jesus Christ, and Him crucified, as the only ground of hope for sinners, and the only source from whence they could derive wisdom, righteousness, sanctification and redemption, i Cor. ii. 2, i. 30.. ..This change in his sentiments, and manner of preaching, though it added efficacy to his moral instructions, and endeared him to his people at home, lost him much of that high estimation in which he had been held abroad. But he knew the gospel of God too well to be ashamed of it : whatever disgrace he suffered in such a cause he could bear with patience1." F. APOSTLES AND PROPHETS. (Ch. II. 20.) On this collocation of Apostles with (Christian) Prophets some inte resting light is thrown by early non-canonical Christian literature. The "Prophet" appears as a conspicuous and most important element in the life and work of some Christian communities in the closing years of 1 Conyers' name occurs in Cowper"s Truth : "[Heaven's] open, and ye cannot enter — why? Because ye will not, Conyers would reply." APPENDICES. 169 cent. 1. The recently discovered Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, often referred to with high respect by the Christian Fathers (St Cle ment of Alexandria even seems to quote it as Scripture, Strom. I. c. XX.), belongs most probably to cent. 1, and to the Churches of Syria. Of its sixteen chapters, five (x., xi., xiii., xiv., xv.) explicitly speak of the Prophets of the Church. We gather that they were usually itinerant visitors to the Churches, but sometimes resident, and then supported by firstfruits. They presided at Divine worship, particularly at the weekly "Thanksgiving" (Eucharist), and had the right (as apparently the ordained "Bishops" and "Deacons," ch. xv., had not) of using their own words in conducting the sacramental service (cp. perhaps Justin Martyr, Apol. I. c. 67). They are called "high priests" (ch. xiii. ). They were to be tested (cp. 1 John iv. 1 ) by known standards of truth, and by their personal consistency of life, but then, so long as their teaching did not contravene those tests, they were to be heard with the submission due to inspired oracles (ch. xi.). To sit in judgment on them was to incur the doom of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. The local " Bishops" and " Deacons" were in some respects inferior to them. The language of ch. xv. indicates, perhaps, that this inspired superior ministry was gradually passing away, and the regularly or dained ministry taking more and more its place. The same document (ch. xi.) mentions other Visitors called "Apo stles ;" so entirely itinerant that a stay of three days in one place would betray the man as a "false prophet." The notice of these "Apostles" is very brief. They were evidently a rarer phenomenon, and of less practical influence, than the Prophets. No reference to the Great Apostles is to be sought in the passage. It may be illustrated by Rom. xvi. 7 (where however see note in this Series) ; and seems to indicate the existence of a class of constantly moving, and inspired, superintendents and instructors of the Churches, who, as such, would bear a likeness to the Great Apostles. No function of superintendence seems to be assigned to the Prophets. In the Shepherd of Hermas (first half of cent. 2), ' Commandment' xi., is a passage referring to the Christian Prophet and his credentials. These credentials were especially a deep personal humility, a renunciation of gain, and the refusal to "prophesy" in answer to consultations and ques tions. The Prophet was regarded as ' ' filled by the angel of the prophetic spirit," when it pleased God, and he then spoke not to individuals but to the congregation. In the "First" Epistle1 of St Clement of Rome to the Church of Corinth (probably about A.D. 95) there is ample allusion to the ordained ministry, but none to the Prophets. The same is the case in the Epistles of St Ignatius and the Epistle of St Polycarp (early cent. 2). In the Epistle of Barnabas, written probably somewhat later than the Teaching, and possibly based upon it in some measure, no allusion to the " Prophets " occurs. 1 The "Second Epistle" is probably by another and later writer. It contains nothing to the point here. 170 . APPENDICES. THE CONFLICT WITH PERSONAL EVIL SPIRITS. (Ch. VI. 12.) We have remarked in the notes on the strong testimony given by this verse, with its exact wording, to the real and objective existence of such personal beings. We may add that such testimony still gains in strength when it is remembered that it was first addressed (at least among other destinations) to Ephesus, and that Ephesus (see Acts xix.) was a pecu liarly active scene of asserted magical and other dealings with the unseen darkness. Supposing that the right line to take in dealing with such beliefs and practices had been to say that the whole basis of them was a fiction of the human mind, not only would such a verse as this not have been written, but, we may well assume, something would have been written strongly contradictory to the thought of it. As it stands, the passage is in full accord with main lines of Scripture doctrine, in both Testaments. H. OLD TESTAMENT QUOTATIONS AND REFERENCES IN THE EPISTLE. Genesis ii. 24, quoted Eph. v. 31. Exodus xx. 12, ,, ,, vi. 2. Psalm iy. 4, „ „ iv. 26 (see note). „ viii. 6, referred to ,, i. 22. ,, lxviii. 18, quoted ,, iv. 8. „ cxviii. 22, referred to ,, ii. 20. Canticles iv. 7, „ ,, v. 27 (possibly). Isaiah Ivii. 19, „ „ ii. 17. ,, lx. 1, quoted „ v. 14; with probable recognition also of Isai. li. 17, Iii. 1 (see note). In view of the fact that the Church addressed in the Epistle is a Church of Gentile converts, these quotations and allusions illustrate instructively the degree to which the Apostle took it for granted that all his converts would study the Old Testament as the Word of God. APPENDICES. 171 J. CHRISTOLOGY OF THE EPISTLE. More by way of suggestion than with any claim of completeness we subjoin a study of the view given by the Epistle of the Person and Work of the Lord Jesus Christ. He is the Son of God : i. 3, iv. 13 ; His Father being also His God : i- 3. 17- The Beloved One (of the Father) : i. 6. With the Father before Creation : i. 4. Incarnate: ii. 15. Slain, by crucifixion: i. 7, ii. 16. Propitiatory Sacrifice, self-offered: v. 2, 25. Redeemer from condemnation : i. 7. See iv. 32. Raised from the dead: i. 20. See ii. 6, iv. 9. Exalted "far above all heavens," to the Throne of the Father : i. 20 — 22, iv. 8 — 10. See ii. 6. Giver, on His ascension, of spiritual gifts from thence : iv. 7, 8. Perpetual Giver, with the Father, of grace and peace : i. 2. See vi. 23. He fills all things in His exaltation : iv. 10. King, with the Father, of the spiritual Kingdom : v. 5. Absolute Master of His own: i. 1, vi. 6. Head of His Church, which is His Body: i. 22, 23, iv. 12, 15, 16, v. 23, 3°- Saviour ofthe Body: v. 23. Mystic Bridegroom ofthe Church, His Bride: v. 25—27. Corner-stone of the spiritual Temple : ii. 20. Indweller in the saints' hearts: iii. 17. Object of spiritual knowledge (iv. 13); faith (i. 15); hope (i. 12); love (vi. 24). Treasury of unsearchable riches : iii. 8. His Love passes knowledge : iii. 19. He is the Secret of spiritual strength: vi. 10. Mediator of Divine pardon : iv. 32. In Him, the Son and Gift of the Father, the Father is eternally glorified : iii. 2 1 ; As in Him the pre-mundane Plan of Redemption was laid by the Father: iii. 11. Other lines of doctrine may be similarly worked out. Let the Epistle, by an effort of imagination, be regarded as a newly discovered Scripture, and interrogated accordingly. Such interrogations will need, of course, to be pursued with hu mility and reverence, and with the remembrance that each section of the Scriptures is but part of an ordered whole. And the enquirer will never lightly forget the great definitions of doctrine, above all the catholic Creeds, produced within the Church in the past, and which 172 APPENDICES. are in fact authoritative collections and summaries of Scripture teaching. But none the less such direct and personal enquiries into the Divine Word in its parts will be as rich in suggestive interest as they will conduce to settlement in faith. "Since you desire to learn concerning the doctrine, let me set forth, to the best of my powers, some few things concerning the faith of Christ. You are indeed competent to ascertain that faith from the Divine Oracles, although you are thus pleased to learn also from other teachers. For the Divine and inspired Scriptures are of themselves sufficient (airapKeis) for the proclamation ofthe Truth." St Athanasius, Oratio contra Gentes, § i. ' ' Perhaps we act rashly, in wishing to discuss and examine the words of God. Yet, why were they spoken, if not to be known? Why were they uttered, if not to be heard? Why were they heard, if not to be understood? May He therefore strengthen us, and grant us somewhat, even as much as He is pleased to grant." St Augustine, In Joannem, Tract, xxi. "Do not only bend over [the Scriptures]: embrace them, and keep them upon your minds. Not to know the Scriptures is the cause of all evils." St Chrysostom, Hom. IX. in Ep. ad Coloss. INDEX TO INTRODUCTION, NOTES, AND APPENDICES. %* From this Index (to subject matter, and to names of Authors,) are omitted for the most part, such references as are obviously indicated by chapter and verse of the Text. absoluteness of Christian Morality, 125, 128, 131 ^Tteid-, 153 Agrippa, 21 AiSn, 62 Albinus, 22 Alford, Dean, 12, 21, 23, 65, 83, 98, 100, iog, 112, 114, 136, 143, 164 Ambrose, St, 136 angelic orders, 62 angels, their interest in Man's salvation, 92 apostle, 43, 168 Aquinas, 133 Arra, 54 Artemis, the Ephesian, 10 article, use of the definite, S5, 95 Asia, province of, 10, 13 Asiarch, 11 Athanasius, St, 172 Augustine, St, 165, 166, 172 baptism, 53, 105, 140, 141 Barnabas, Epistle of, 169 Basil, St, 25 Baur, 23 Bayne, 98 Bengel, 37, 104, 105, 133, 135 Beveridge, Bp, 166 Bible, the, 41, 158 blasphemy, 124 Blood of Christ, doctrine of the, 49, 78 Boadicea, 21 Browne, Bp, 166 Browning, 167 Eunyan, 151 Burnet, Bp, 124 Burrus, 18, 22 Call of Grace, 59 Childe, C. F., 108 Chinese, national permanence of, 145 Christ, the soul's immediate contact with, 113 and the Church, in, 138 his Death, 49, 81, 127 his Deity, 45, 47, 100, 125 Christology of St Paul, 60, 171 Chrysostom, St, 8, 137, 172 Church, the, 63, 64, 166 Clement, St, of Alexandria, 22, 137, 168 Rome, 169 Coleridge, S. T., 41, 61 Colossian Epistle, parallels of, with the Ephesian, 29 Heresy, 14, 62 Communion, the Holy, not mentioned in the Epistle, 101 Conyers, 167, 168 Corinthians, First Epistle to the, 10, 13 Cowper, 127, 168 creation, connexion of, with Redemp tion, 91 creation, spiritual, 74 Cunningham, 167 Dante, 62 ^ death, spiritual, 65 Devil, personality of the, 67, 151 — his "authority," 152 174 INDEX. De Wette, 23 "Dionysius the Areopagite," 62 Doctrine and Practice, 103 Dods, Marcus, 92 Edersheim, Dr, 133 Ellicott, Bp,- 60, 109, 112, 127, 138, 149, 151, 152, 156, 161 Elzevir, 43 Ephesians, Epistle to the, its date, 20 — occasion, 20 ¦ — contents, 21 — place of writing, 21 — authenticity, 22 — destination, 24, &c. — character, 24, 41 Ephesus, 9, &c. — Council of, 15 Ephrem, St, 62 Epictetus, 19 Epistles ofthe Captivity, order of, 20 — Revelation, 14, 33 Eusebius, 137 Euthalius, 164 evil spirits, real existence of, 152, 170 Falkener, 16 Fatherhood of God, 45. 82 flesh, 69 fruit, metaphor of, 131, 132 Gentiles, Rabbinic estimate of, 75 Gerlach, von, 70 gifts, spiritual, 53 glory of God, 52, 57, 96 Gospel, character of the, 91 Gregory of Nazianzus, St, 53 Hagenbach, 167 Harless, 21, 144 Headship of Christ, 51, 63, 113, 138, 165 heavens, 108 Herbert, 148 Holy Spirit, the, harmony of His work with that of Christ, 98 home, the Christian, 139, 140, 146, 147 Homer, 127 Hooker, 63, 138, 143 Howson, Dean, 23, 32, 55, 87 humiliation, essential in Christian ethics, 137 humour, how not censured by the Gospel, 129 hymnody, early Christian, 136 ideal and actual in the history of the Soul, 50, 76, 115, 116, 119, 120, 126 Ignatius, St, his Epistle to the Ephesians, 23' =7, 83, T53 imitation of God, 126 "in Christ," frequency of the phrase, 114 Jn Mevwriam, 94 inspiration, 87 Irenaeus, St, 22 Israel, 76 Jerome, St, 26, 95, 100, 133, 149, 150, 153 John, St, at Ephesus, 15 Josephus, 160 Justin, St, 81, 137, 168 Kay, Dr, 107, 122, 133 King Lear, 131 Kingship of Christ, eternal, 63 Leighton, Abp, 5g, 124 Lewin, 16, 160 life, spiritual, 115 Lightfoot, Bp, n, 16, 17, 18. 19, 20, 23, 27, 64, 65, 67, 117, 129, 147, 153, 160, 161, 162 love, Christian, special and general, 56 Lucan, 19 Lumby, Professor, 13 ¦malleoli ', 157 Marcion, 25, 27 marriage-metaphor, the, in Scripture, 138 Marshall, On Sanctification , 119 McCaul, Old Paths, 75 Meyer, 21, 93 Miletus, charge to Presbyters at, 13, 32 Milner, 167 Mommsen, 77 Monod, Adolphe, 41, 48, 70, 74, 93, 99, 102, 123, 129, 139, 140, 144, 156 Mozley, Professor, 70, 166, 167 Newton, John, 167 O'Brien, Bp, 73 Old Testament, apostolic estimate of, 146, 158, 170 Olshausen, 60 Origen, 25, 62 Original Sin, 70, 166 Pascal, 38 Pastoral Epistles, 14, 32 Paul, St, at Rome, 16, &c. — — described, 42 — — his name, 43 — — his prayers, 56 Pearson, Bp, 44, 108, 124, 125 Perowne, Dean (of Peterborough), 86, 107, 122 Photius, 100 Pleroma, 64, 121 Pliny, 136, 137 Plutarch, 122 Polycarp, St, 160 Pomponia Graecma, 19 Poole, 100 Poppsea, 22 prophets of the N. T., 83, 168 punctuation of Greek MSS. INDEX. '75 quinquennium of Nero, 22 quotations from O. T. in N. T., 107, 144, 170 reconciliation, 80, 127 Renan, 24, 26 reward, Christian doctrine of, 148 Ridley, Bp., 166 •'Robber Synod," 15 salutations, apostolic, 162 salvation, 71, 139 sanctification, 140 Scott, Thomas, 45 Scrivener, Dr, 164 Seneca and St Paul, 18 Severianus, 100 Shedd, Professor, 167 SJiepherd of Hermas, 83, 169 sin and sinning, 117 slavery and the Gospel, 147 slaves, wholesale execution of, 21 Smith, Prof. Goldwin, 147 solidarity of Man, natural and spiritual 80 Sophocles, 77 spirit, 57, 124 "Spirit, in the," 135 spiritual processes, descriptions of, 37 Stoicism, 19 Taylor, Bp Jeremy, 135 Teaching 0/ 'the Twelve Apostles, 168 Tertullian, 22 Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs, 42, 62 Tichonius (Tyconius), 166 Trench, Abp, 66, 76, 83, 103, 104, 116, 120, 124, 125, 131, 152 Trent, Catechism of, 143 truthfulness, Scriptural emphasis on, 122 Ussher, Abp, 26 Westcott, Professor, 23, 25 Westminster Review, 67 Wetstein, 68, 78, 96, 109, 122, 157, 160 Wood, J. T., 16. "world, the," 67 wrath of God, 70 Zanchius, 100 flCsmbrtbijE : PRINTED BY C J. CLAY, M.A. AND SONS, AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRE88. » THE PITT PRESS SERIES. *** Complete catalogues of the Pitt Press Series and of the other publicattotis of the University Press will be sent on application. *** Many ofthe books in this list can be had in two volumes, Text and Notes separately. I. GREEK. Aristophanes. Aves— Plutus— Ranse. By W. C. Green, M. A., late Assistant Master at Rugby School. 3s. td. each. Vespae. By C. E. Graves, M.A. 3.1. 6d. Aristotle. Outlines of the Philosophy of. By Edwin Wallace, M.A., LL.D. Third Edition, Enlarged. 4s. td. Euripides. Heracleidae. By E. A. Beck, M.A., and C. E. S. Headlam, M.A. 3s. td. Hercules Furens. By A. Gray, M.A., and J. T. Hutchinson, M.A. as. Hippolytus. By W. S. Hadley, M.A. 2s. Iptegeneia in Aulis. By C. E. S. Headlam, M.A. 2s. 6d. Hecuba. By W. S. Hadley, M.A. 2s. 6d. Orestes. By N. Wedd, M.A. [In the Press. Herodotus, Book V; By E. S. Shuckburgh, M.A. 3s. Books VI., VU, IX. By the same Editor. 4J. each. Book VOL Ch. 1—90. Book IX. Ch. 1—89. By the same Editor. as. td. each. Homer. Odyssey, Book IX. By G. M. Edwards, M.A. 2s. 6d. Book X. By the same Editor, is. td. Book XXI. By the same Editor. 2S. r Iliad. Bks. VI., XXII., XXIII, XXIV. By the same Editor, as- each. Platonis Apologia Socratis. By J. Adam, M.A. 3*. 6d. Crito. By the same Editor. 2s. 6d. Euthyphro. By the same Editor. 2s. 6d. Protagoras. By J. & A. M. Adam. 4s. 6d. Sophocles. Oedipus Tyrannus. School Edition. By R. C. Jebb, Litt.D., LL.D. +s. td. Thucydides. Book III. With Introduction and Notes. By A. W. Sphatt, M.A. [/« the Press. Book VII. By H. A. Holden, M.A., LL.D. 5s. Xenophon. Agesilaus. By H. Hailstone, M.A. 2s. 6d. Anabasis. By A. Pretor, M.A. Two vols. js. bd. Books I. and II. By the same. 4s. Books I. HE. IV. and V. By the same. 2s. each. Books II. VI. and VII. By the same. 2s. td. each. Xenophon. Cyropaedeia. Books I. II. By Rev. H. A. Hol den, M.A., LL.D. a vols. ts. Books III. IV. and V. By the same Editor. 5.?. Books VI. VII. VIII. By the same Editor. t,s. London: Cambridge Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. PUBLICATIONS OF II. LATIN. Bedas Ecclesiastical History, Books III., IV. By J. E. B. Mayor, M.A., and J. R. Lumby, D.D. Revised Edition, js. 6d. Books I. II. [In the Press. Caesar. De Bello Gallico, Comment. I. By A. G. Peskett, M.A., Fellow of Magdalene College, Cambridge, it 60!. Comment. II. III. as. Comment. I. II. III. 31. Comment. IV. and V. 11. td. Comment. VII. as. Comment. VI. and Comment. VIII. is. td. each. De Bello Civili, Comment. I. By the same Editor. 3$. Com. III. By the same. [In the Press. Cicero. De Amicitia. — De Senectute. By J. S. Reid, Litt.D., Fellow of Gonville and Caius College. 3s. td. each. In Verrem Actio Prima. By H. Cowie, M.A. is. bd. In Q. Caecilium Divinatio et in C. Verrem Actio. By W. E. Heitland, M.A., and H. Cowie, M.A. 3*. Philippica Secunda. By A, G. Peskett, M.A. y. bd. Oratio pro Archia Poeta. By J. S. Reid, Litt.D. 2s. Pro L. Cornelio Balbo Oratio. By the same. is. bd. Oratio pro Milone. New Edition. By J. S. Reid, LittD. as. td. Oratio pro L. Murena. By W. E. Heitland, M.A. 3*. Pro Cn.Plancio Oratio, by H.A.Holden,LL.D. 4s.bd. Pro P. Cornelio Sulla. By J. S. Reid, Litt.D. 3*. bd. Cornelius Nepos. Lives of Miltiades, Themistocles, Aristides, Pausanias and Cimon, by E. S. Shuckburgh, M.A. is. td. Horace. Epistles, Book I. By E. S. Shuckburgh, M.A. 2s. bd. Livy. Books IV, VI, IX, XXVII. By H. M. Stephenson, M.A. as. td. each. Book V. By L. Whibley, M.A. 2s. bd. Bks, XXI, XXII. ByM.S.DiMSDALE, M.A. 2s. 6^. each. Lucretius. Book V. By J. D. Duff, M.A. 2s. Ovidii Nasonis Fastorum Liber VI. By A. Sidgwick, M.A., u. td. Plautus. Epidicus. By J. H. Gray, M.A. 3*. Asinaria. By the same Editor. 3s. bd. Stichus. By C. A. M. Fennell, Litt.D. 2s. bd. Tacitus. Agricola and Germania. By H. M. Stephenson, M.A. 3s. Terence. Hautontimorumenos. By J. H. Gray, M.A. [Nearly ready, Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Libri L— XII. By A. Sidgwick, M.A. is. td. each. Bucolica. By the same Editor, is. bd. Georgicon Libri I. II. By the same Editor. 2s. Libri HI. IV. By the same Editor. 2s. The Complete Works. By the same Editor. Two vols. Vol. I. containing the Introduction and Text. 31. td. Vol. II. The Notes. +1. td. London: Cambridge Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 3 III. FRENCH. Corneille. Polyeucte. By E.G.W. Braunholtz, M. A., Ph. V>.2s. De Bonnechose. Lazare Hoche. By C. Colbeck, M.A. Revised Edition. Four Maps. as. Delavigne. Louis XI. Edited by H. W. Eve, M.A. 2s. De Lamartine. Jeanne D'Arc. By Rev. A. C. Clapin, M.A. New edition revised, by A. R. Ropes, M.A. is. td. De Vigny. La Canne de Jonc. By H. W. Eve, M.A. is. bd. Erckmann-Chatrian. La Guerre. By Rev. A. C Clapin, M.A. 31. Guizot. Discours sur l'histoire de la Revolution d' Angle terre. By H. W. Eve, M.A. as. td. Merimee. Colomba. Edited by A. R. Ropes, M.A. 2s. Moliere. Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme, Come'die-Ballet en Cinq Actes. (1670.) By Rev. A. C. Clapin, M.A. Revised Edition, u. td. L'Ecole des Femmes. By G. Saintsbury, M.A. 2s. bd. Les Precieuses Ridicules. By E. G. W. Braunholtz, M.A. as. Abridged Edition, is. Le Misanthrope. By the same Editor. 2s. bd. Piron. La Metromanie. A Comedy. By G. Masson, B.A. 2s. Ponsard. Charlotte Corday. By A. R. Ropes, M.A. 2s. Racine. Les Plaideurs. By E. G. W. Braunholtz, M.A. 2s. Abridged Edition, is. Sainte-Beuve. M. Daru (Causeries du Lundi, Vol. IX.). By G. Masson, B.A. as. Saintine. Picciola. By Rev. A. C. Clapin, M.A. 2s. Scribe and Legouve. Bataille de Dames. By Rev. H. A. Bull, M.A. as. Scribe. Le Verre d'Eau. By C. Colbeck, M.A. 2s. Souvestre. Un Philosophe sous les Toits. By H. W. Eve, M.A. as. Le Serf and Le Chevrier de Lorraine. Edited by A. R. Ropes, M.A. as. Le Serf. Edited by A. R. ROPES, M.A., with Vocabu lary, is. td. Thierry. Lettres sur l'histcire de France (XIII. — XXIV). By G. Masson, B. A., and G. W. Prothero, Litt. D. 2*. td. Voltaire. Histoire du Siecle de Louis XIV. Chaps. I. — XIII. By G. Masson, B.A., and G. W. Prothero, Litt. D. as. td. Part II. Chaps. XIV.— XXIV. as. td. Part III. Chaps. XXV. to end. as. td. Xavier de Maistre. La Jeune Siberienne. Le Lepreux de la Cite' d'Aoste. By G. Masson, B.A. is. td. London: Cambridge Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. PUBLICATIONS OF IV. GERMAN. Ballads on German History. By W. Wagner, Ph.D. 2s. Benedix. Doctor Wespe. Lustspiel in fiinf Aufziigen. By Karl Hermann Breul, M.A., Ph.D. 3*. German Dactylic Poetry. By Wilhelm Wagner, Ph.D. $s. Goethe's Knabenjahre. (1749— 1761.) By W. Wagner, Ph.D. New edition revised and enlarged, by J. W. Cartmell, M.A. as. Hermann und Dorothea. By Wilhelm Wagner, Ph.D. New edition revised, by J. W. Cartmell, M.A. 3s. td. Gutzkow. Zopf und Schwert. Lustspiel in fiinf Aufzugen. By H. J. Wolstenholme, B.A. (Lond.). 3*. td. Hackiander. Der geheime Agent. Edited by E. L. Milner Barry, M.A. 3s. Hauff. Das Bild des Kaisers. By Karl Hermann Breul, M.A., Ph.D., University Lecturer in German. 3*. Das Wirthshaus im Spessart. By the late A. Schlottmann, Ph.D. and J. W. Cartmell, M.A. 3s. Die Karavane. By A. Schlottmann, Ph.D. y. Immermann. Der Oberhof. A Tale of Westphalian Life. By Wilhelm Wagner, Ph.D. 3s. Klee. Die deutschen Heldensagen (Hagen und Hilde, and Gudrun). Edited by H. J. Wolstenholme, B.A. (Lond.). 3s. Kohlrausch. Das Jahr 1813. By Wilhelm Wagner, Ph.D. 2s. Lessing and Gellert. Selected Fables. By Karl Hermann Breul, M.A., Ph.D. 3s. Mendelssohn's Letters. Selections from. By J. Sime, M.A. 3.?. Raumer. Der erste Kreuzzug (1095 — 1099). By Wilhelm Wagner, Ph.D. 25. Riehl. Culturgeschichtliche Novellen. By H. J. Wolsten holme, B.A. (Lond.). 3;. td. ¦ Die Ganerben and Die Gerechtigkeit Gottes. By the same Editor. 3s. Schiller. Maria Stuart. By Karl Hermann Breul, M.A. Ph.D. 31. td. Wilhelm Tell. By the same Editor. 2s. bd. Abridged Edition, is. td. Geschichte des dreissigjahrigen Kriegs. Buch III. By the same Editor. 3s. Wallenstein I. (Wallensteins Lager and Die Picco- lomini). By the same Editor. 3s. td. ). rSy tne same Editor. 3^. bd. Wallenstein II. (Wallensteins Tod). By the same Editor. [In the Press. Uhland. Ernst, Herzogvon Schwaben. By H. J. Wolsten holme, B.A. 3*. td. London: Cambridge Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. V. ENGLISH. Bacon's History of the Reign of King Henry VII. By the Rev. Professor Lumby, D.D. 3*. Cowley's Essays. By the same Editor. 4s. Milton's Comus and Arcades. By A. W. Verity, M.A., sometime Scholar of Trinity College. 3s. Milton's Ode on the Morning of Christ's Nativity, L' Allegro, II Penseroso and Lycidas. By the same Editor, as. td. Milton's Samson Agonistes. By the same Editor. 2s. bd. Milton's Paradise Lost. Books I. II. By the same Editor. 2s. Bks. IH. IV. By the same. 2s. Books V. VI. By the same. 2s. Books VII. VIII. By the same. 2s. Books XL XII. By the same. 2s. More's History of King Richard HI. ByJ.R.LuMBY,D.D. y.bd. More's Utopia. By the same Editor, y. bd. Scott. Marmion. Edited with Introduction, Notes and Glos sary by J. Howard B. Masterman, B.A., Lecturer of St John's College, Cambridge, as. td. Shakespeare. A Midsummer Night's Dream. Edited, with Introduction, Notes and Glossary by A. W. Verity, M.A. is. td. Twelfth Night. By the same Editor, is. bd. Sidney, Sir Philip. An Apologie for Poetrie. By E. S. Shuckburgh, M.A. The Text is a revision of that of the first edition of 1595. 3s. VI. EDUCATIONAL SCIENCE. Comenius, John Amos, Bishop of the Moravians. His Life and Educational Works, by S. S. Laurie, LL.D., F.RS.E. 3s. td. Education, Three Lectures on the Practice of. I. On Mark ing, by H ,W. Eve, M. A. II. On Stimulus, by A. Sidgwick, M.A. III. On the Teaching of Latin Verse Composition, by E. A. Abbott, D.D. as. Stimulus. A Lecture delivered for the Teachers' Training Syndicate, May, 1882, by A. Sidgwick, M.A. is. Locke on Education. By the Rev. R. H. Quick, M.A. y. bd. Milton's Tractate on Education. A facsimile reprint from the Edition of 1673. By O. Browning, M.A. as. Modern Languages, Lectures on the Teaching of. By C. Colbeck, M.A.. as. Teacher, General Aims of the, and Form Management. Two Lectures delivered in the University of Cambridge in the Lent Term, 1881, by F. W. Farrar, D.D., and R. B. Poole, B.D. is. td. Teaching, Theory and Practice of. By the Rev. E. Thring, M.A., late Head Master of Uppingham School. New Edition. 41. td. London: Cambridge Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. PUBLICATIONS OF VII. MATHEMATICS. Arithmetic for Schools. By C. Smith, M.A., Master of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge. With or without Answers. Second Edi tion. 3s. td. Or in two Parts, as. each. Key to Smith's Arithmetic. By G. Hale, M.A. 7s. bd. Elementary Algebra. By W. W. Rouse Ball, M.A., Fellow and Tutor of Trinity College, Cambridge. 45 td. Euclid's Elements of Geometry. By H. M. Taylor, M.A., Fellow and formerly Tutor of Trinity College, Cambridge. Books I.— VI. 4.v. Books I.— IV. 31. Books I. and II. is. td. Books III. and IV. is. td. Books V. and VI. is. td. Books XI. and XII. [In the Press. Solutions to the Exercises in Taylor's Euclid, Books I— IV. By W. W. Taylor, M.A. ts. Elements of Statics and Dynamics. By S. L. Loney, M.A., late Fellow of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge, ¦js. td. Or in two parts. Fart I. Elements of Statics. +s. td. Fart II. Elements of Dynamics. 3s. td. Solutions to the Examples in the Elements of Statics and Dynamics. By the same Author, •js. td. Mechanics and Hydrostatics for Beginners. By the same Author. 4r. td. An Elementary Treatise on Plane Trigonometry. By E. W. Hobson, ScD., Fellow and Tutor of Christ's College, Cambridge, and C. M. Jessop, M.A., Fellow of Clare College, Cambridge. 4s. td. The Elements of English Grammar. By A. S. West, M.A., Trinity College, Cambridge, as. td. English Grammar for Beginners. By A. S. West, M.A. is. [In the Press. British India, a Short History of. By E. S. Carlos, M.A., late Head Master of Exeter Grammar Scbool. is. Geography, Elementary Commercial. A Sketch of the Com modities and the Countries of the World. By H. R. Mill, D.Sc, F.R.S.E. New Edition Revised and Enlarged, is. td. Geography, an Atlas of Commercial. (A Companion to the above.) By J. G. Bartholomew, F.R.G.S. With an Introduction by Hugh Robert Mill, D.Sc. 3s. Other Volumes are in preparation. London: Cambridge Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. %\)t Cambrtoge Bftle to ^tjjools anti Colleges* General Editor : J. J. S. PEROWNE, D.D., Bishop of Worcester. Now Ready. Cloth, Extra Fcap. 8vo. With Maps. Book of Joshua. By Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D. 2s. bd. Book of Judges. By Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. 3.?. bd. First and Second Books of Samuel. By Rev. Prof. Kirk patrick, D.D. 3s. td. each. First and Second Books of Kings. Prof. Lumby, D.D. y.bd. each. Books of Ezra and Nehemiah. By Rev. Prof. Ryle, D.D. 4^. bd. Book of Job. By Rev. A. B. Davidson, D.D. y. Book of Psalms. Book I. By Prof. Kirkpatrick, D.D. y. bd. Book of Ecclesiastes. By Very Rev. E. H. Plumptre, D.D. y. Book of Jeremiah. By Rev. A. W. Streane, B.D. 4s. bd. Book of Ezekiel. By Rev. A. B. Davidson, D.D. y. Book of Hosea. By Rev. T. K. Cheyne, M.A., D.D. y. Books of Obadiah & Jonah. By Archdeacon Perowne. 2s. bd. Book of Micah. By Rev. T. K. Cheyne, M.A., D.D. ij. bd. Haggai, Zechariah & Malachi. By Archd. Perowne. y. bd. Book of Malachi. By the same Editor, is. Gospel according to St Matthew. ByRev.A. Carr, M.A. 2s.bd. Gospel according to St Mark. Rev. G.F. Maclear, D.D. 2s.bd. Gospel according to St Luke. By Arch. Farrar, D.D. 4s. bd. Gospel according to St John. By Rev. A. Plummer, D.D. 4s.bd. Acts ofthe Apostles. By Rev. Prof. Lumby, D.D. 4*. bd. Epistle to the Romans. By Rev. H. C.G. Moule, B.D. y.bd. First and Second Corinthians. By Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. 2^.each. Epistle to the Galatians. ByRev. E. H. Perowne, D.D. is.bd. Epistle to the Ephesians. ByRev. H. C.G. Moule, B.D. 2s. bd. Epistle to the Philippians. By the same Editor. 2s. bd. Colossians and Philemon. By the same Editor. 2s. Epistles to the Thessalonians. ByRev. G.G. Findlay, B.A. 2s. Epistle to the Hebrews. By Archd. Farrar, D.D. y. bd. Epistle of St James. Very Rev. E. H. Plumptre, D.D. is. bd. Epistles of St Peter and St Jude. By the same Editor. 2s. bd. Epistles of St John. By Rev. A. Plummer, D.D. y. bd. Book of Eevelation. By the late Rev. W. H. Simcox, M.A. y. Epistles to Timothy & Titus. By Rev. A. E. Humphreys, M.A. [Nearly ready. London: Cambridge Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. 8 PUBLICATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. €t)z Smaller Cambridge JBifale for ^c&ools Now ready. Price is. each Volume, with Map. Book of Joshua. By J. S. Black, M.A. Book of Judges. By the same Editor. First Book of Samuel. By Rev. Prof. Kirkpatrick, D.D. Second Book of Samuel. By the same Editor. First Book of Kings. By Rev. Prof. Lumby, D.D. Second Book of Kings. By the same Editor. Gospel according to St Matthew. By Rev. A. Carr, M.A. Gospel according to St Mark. By Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D. Gospel according to St Luke. By Archdeacon Farrar, D.D. Gospel according to St John. By Rev. A. Plummer, D.D. Acts of the Apostles. By Rev. Prof. Lumby, D.D. C&e Camorfljge (greek Cestament for et>tf)oote anti Colleges, with a Revised Text, based on the most recent critical authorities, and English Notes. General Editor: J. J. S. PEROWNE, D.D., Bishop of Worcester. Gospel according to St Matthew. By Rev. A. Carr, M.A. With 4 Maps. t,s. td. Gospel according to St Mark. By Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D. With 3 Maps. 4J, td. Gospel according to St Luke. By Archdeacon Farrar With 4 Maps. ts. Gospel according to St John. By Rev. A. Plummer, D.D. With 4 Maps. ts. Acts of the Apostles. By Rev. Professor Lumby, D.D. With 4 Maps. ts. First Epistle to the Corinthians. By Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. 3*. Second Epistle to the Corinthians. By the same Editor, y. Epistle to the Hebrews. By Archdeacon Farrar, D. D. y. bd. Epistles of St John. By Rev. A. Plummer, M.A., D.D. 4s. General Editor: Rev. J. A. ROBINSON, B.D., Norrisian Professor of Divinity. Book of Revelation. By the late Rev. W. H. Simcox, M.A. y. Epistle to the Philippians. By Rev. H. C. G. Moule, B.D. [In the Press. aonHon: C. J. CLAY and SONS, CAMBRIDGE WAREHOUSE, AVE MARIA LANE. ffilasflubj: 263, ARGYLE STREET. leinjig: F. A. BROCKHAUS. £eta gotft: MACMILLAN AND CO. CAMBRIDGE : PRINTED BV J. & C F. CLAY, AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. THE CAMBRIDGE BIBLE FOR SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES. General Editor, J. J. S. Perowne, Bishop of Worcester. $pt'm'ons of tfje ^ress, "// is difficult to commend too highly this excellent series." — Guardian. " The modesty of the general title of this series has, we believe, led many to misunderstand its character and underrate its value. The books are well suited for study in the upper forms of our best schools, but not the less are they adapted to the wants of all Bible students who are not specialists. We doubt, indeed, whether any of the numerous popular commentaries recently issued in this country will be found more service able for general use" — Academy. " One of the most popular and useful literary enterprises of the nineteenth century" — Baptist Magazine. " Of great value. The whole series of comments for schools is highly esteemed by students capable of forming a judgment. The books are scholarly without being pretentious : and information is so given as to be easily understood. " — Sword and Trowel. " The notes possess a rare advantage of being scholarly, and at the same time within the comprehension of the average reader. For the Sunday- School Teacher we do not know of a more valuable work." — Sunday- School Chronicle. The Book of Judges. J. J. Lias, M.A. " His introduction is clear and concise, full of the information which young students require." — Baptist Magazine. II. Samuel. A. F. Kirkpatrick, D.D. "Small as this work is in mere dimensions, it is every way the best on its subject and for its purpose that we know of. The opening sections at once prove the thorough competence of the writer for dealing with questions of criti cism in an earnest, faithful and devout spirit ; and the appendices discuss a few special difficulties with a full knowledge of the data, and a judicial reserve, which contrast most favourably with the superficial dogmatism which has too often made the exegesis of the Old Testament a field for the play of unlimited paradox and the ostentation of personal infalli bility. The notes are always clear and suggestive; never trifling or irrelevant; and they everywhere demonstrate the great difference in value between the work of a commentator who is also a Hebraist, and that of one who has to depend for his Hebrew upon secondhand sources. " — Academy. I. Kings and Ephesians. "With great heartiness we commend these most valuable little commentaries. We had rather purchase these than nine out of ten of the big blown up expositions. Quality is far better than quantity, and we have it here." — Sword and Trowel. II. Kings. "The Introduction is scholarly and wholly admirable, the notes must be of incalculable value to students." — Glasgow Herald. " It would be difficult to find a commentary better suited for general use. " — Academy. 10,000 8/10/94 i CAMBRIDGE BIBLE FOR SCHOOLS &• COLLEGES. The Book of Job. "Able and scholarly as the Introduction is, it is far surpassed by the detailed exegesis ofthe book. In this Dr Davidson's strength is at its greatest. His linguistic knowledge, his artistic habit, his scientific insight, and his literary power have full scope when he comes to exegesis...." — The Spectator. " In the course of a long introduction, Dr Davidson has presented us with a very able and very interesting criticism of this wonderful book. Its contents, the nature of its composition, its idea and purpose, its integrity, and its age are all exhaustively treated of.... We have not space to examine fully the text and notes before us, but we can, and do heartily, recommend the book, not only for the upper forms in schools, but to Bible students and teachers generally. As we wrote of a previous volume in the same series, this one leaves nothing to be desired. The notes are full and suggestive, without being too long, and, in itself, the introduction forms a valuable addition to modern Bible literature." — The Educational Times. "Already we have frequently called attention to this exceedingly valuable work as its volumes have successively appeared. But we have never done so with greater pleasure, very seldom with so great pleasure, as we now refer to the last published volume, that on the Book of Joh, by Dr Davidson, of Edinburgh. ...We cordially commend the volume to all our readers. The least instructed will understand and enjoy it; and mature scholars will learn from it." — Methodist Recorder. Psalms. Book I. "His commentary upon the books of Samuel was good, but this is incomparably better, shewing traces of much more work and of greater independence of scholarship and judgment.... As a whole it is admirable, and we are hardly going too far in saying that it is one of the very ablest of all the volumes that have yet appeared in the 'Cambridge Bible for Schools'." — Record. "Another volume of this excellent Bible, in which the student may rely on meeting with the latest scholarship. The introduction is ad mirable. We know of nothing in so concise a form better adapted for Sunday-School Teachers. " — Sunday-School Chronicle. "It is full of instruction and interest, bringing within easy reach of the English reader the results of the latest scholarship bearing upon the study of this ever new book of the Bible. The Introduction of eighty pages is a repertory of information, not drily but interestingly given. " — Methodist Recorder. "For a masterly summary of all that is known and much that is hazarded about the history and authorship of this book of religious lyrics we can point to thatwith which Mr Kirkpatrick prefaces his new volume. From a perusal of this summary the student will be unimpres sionable indeed if he rise not convinced of the vitality imparted to the Psalter by a systematic study of its literary character and historical allusions.... In conclusion, we may say that for a work which is handy, and withal complete, we know none better than this volume ; and we await with considerable interest the next instalment. " — Education. "It seems in every way a most valuable little book, containing a mass of information, well-assorted, and well-digested, and will be useful not only to students preparing for examinations, but to many who want OPINIONS OF THE PRESS. a handy volume of explanation to much that is difficult in the Psalter. We owe a great debt of gratitude to Professor Kirkpatrick for his scholarly and interesting volume." — Church Times. ' ' In this volume thoughtful exegesis founded on nice critical scholar ship and due regard for the opinions of various writers, combine, under the influence of a devout spirit, to render this commentary a source of much valuable assistance. The notes are 'though deep yet clear,' for they seem to put in a concentrated form the very pith and marrow of all the best that has been hitherto said on the subject, with striking freedom from anything like pressure of personal views. Throughout the work care and pains are as conspicuous as scholarship." — Literary Churchman. Job — Hosea. " It is difficult to commend too highly this excellent series, the volumes of which are now becoming numerous. The two books before us, small as they are in size, comprise almost everything that the young student can reasonably expect to find in the way of helps towards such general knowledge of their subjects as may be gained without an attempt to grapple with the Hebrew ; and even the learned scholar can hardly read without interest and benefit the very able intro ductory matter which both these commentators have prefixed to their volumes. It is not too much to say that these works have brought within the reach of the ordinary reader resources which were until lately quite unknown for understanding some of the most difficult and obscure portions of Old Testament literature." — Guardian. Ecclesiastes ; or, the Preacher. — "Of the Notes, it is sufficient to say that they are in every respect worthy of Dr Plumptre's high repu tation as a scholar and a critic, being at once learned, sensible, and practical..., Commentaries are seldom attractive reading. This little volume is a notable exception." — The Scotsman. Jeremiah, by A. W. Streane, B.D. "The arrangement of the book is well treated on pp. xxx., 396, and the question of Baruch's relations with its composition on pp. xxvii., xxxiv., 317. The illustrations from English literature, history, monuments, works on botany, topography, etc. , are good and plentiful, as indeed they are in other volumes of this series." — Church Quarterly Review. Malachi. "Archdeacon Perowne has already edited Jonah and Zechariah for this series. Malachi presents comparatively few difficulties and the Editor's treatment leaves nothing to be desired. His introduction is clear and scholarly and his commentary sufficient. We may instance the notes on ii. 15 and iv. 2 as examples of careful arrangement, clear exposition and graceful expression." — Academy. " The Gospel according to St Matthew, by the Rev. A. Carr. The introduction is able, scholarly, and eminently practical, as it bears on the authorship and contents of the Gospel, and the original form in which it is supposed to have been written. It is well illustrated by two excellent maps of the Holy Land and of the Sea of Galilee." — English Churchman. "St Mark, with Notes by the Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D. Into this small volume Dr Maclear, besides a clear and able Introduc tion to the Gospel, and the text of St Mark, has compressed many 4 CAMBRIDGE BIBLE FOR SCHOOLS & COLLEGES. hundreds of valuable and helpful notes. In short, he has given us a capital manual of the kind required — containing all that is needed to illustrate the text, i. e. all that can be drawn from the history, geography, customs, and manners of the time. But as a handbook, giving in a clear and succinct form the information which a lad requires in order to stand an examination in the Gospel, it is admirable I can very heartily commend it, not only to the senior boys and girls in our High Schools, but also to Sunday-school teachers, who may get from it the very kind of knowledge they often find it hardest to get." — Expositor. "With the help of a book like this, an intelligent teacher may make 'Divinity' as interesting a lesson as any in the school course. The notes are of a kind that will be, for the most part, intelligible to boys of the lower forms of our public schools ; but they may be read with greater profit by the fifth and sixth, in conjunction with the original text." — The Academy. "St Luke. Canon Farrar has supplied students of the Gospel with an admirable manual in this volume. It has all that copious variety of illustration, ingenuity of suggestion, and general soundness of interpretation which readers are accustomed to expect from the learned and eloquent editor. Anyone who has been accustomed to associate the idea of 'dryness' with a commentary, should go to Canon Farrar's St Luke for a more correct impression. He will find that a commen tary may be made interesting in the highest degree, and that without losing anything of its solid value. ...But, so to speak, it is too good for some of the readers for whom it is intended." — The Spectator. The Gospel according to St John. "The notes are extremely scholarly and valuable, and in most cases exhaustive, bringing to the elucidation of the text all that is best in commentaries, ancient and modern." — The English Churchman and Clerical Journal. "(i) The Acts of the Apostles. By J. Rawson Lumby, D.D. (2) The Second Epistle of the Corinthians, edited by Professor Lias. The introduction is pithy, and contains a mass of carefully-selected information on the authorship of the Acts, its designs, and its sources. The Second Epistle of the Corinthians is a manual beyond all praise, for the excellence of its pithy and pointed annotations, its analysis of the contents, and the fulness and value of its introduction." — Examiner. "The Rev. H. C. G. Moule, B.D., has made a valuable addition to The Cambridge Bible for Schools in his brief commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. The 'Notes' are very good, and lean, as the notes of a School Bible should, to the most commonly ac cepted and orthodox view of the inspired author's meaning ; while the Introduction, and especially the Sketch of the Life of St Paul, is a model of condensation. It is as lively and pleasant to read as if two or three facts had not been crowded into well-nigh every sentence." — Expositor. "The Epistle to the Romans. It is seldom we have met with a work so remarkable for the compression and condensation of all that is valuable in the smallest possible space as in the volume before us. Within its limited pages we have 'a sketch of the Life of St Paul,' we have further a critical account of the date of the Epistle to the Romans, of its language, and of its genuineness. The notes are OPINIONS OF THE PRESS numerous, full of matter, to the point, and leave no real difficulty or obscurity unexplained." — The Examiner. "The First Epistle to the Corinthians. Edited by Professor Lias. Every fresh instalment of this annotated edition of the Bible for Schools confirms the favourable opinion we formed of its value from the exami nation of its first number. The origin and plan of the Epistle are discussed with its character and genuineness." — The Nonconformist. Galatians. "Dr Perowne deals throughout in a very thorough manner with every real difficulty in the text, and in this respect he has faithftilly followed the noble example set him in the exegetical master piece, his indebtedness to which he frankly acknowledges." — Modern Church. "The introductory matter is very full and informing, whilst the Notes are admirable. They combine the scholarly and the practical in an unusual degree It is not the young students in 'schools and colleges' alone who will find this Commentary helpful on every page. ' ' — Record. " This little work, like all ofthe series, is a scholarly production; but we can also unreservedly recommend it from a doctrinal standpoint ; Dr E. H. Perowne is one who has grasped the distinctive teaching of the Epistle, and expounds it with clearness and definiteness. In an appendix, he ably maintains the correctness of the A. V. as against the R. V. in the translation of II. 16, a point of no small importance." — English Churchman. The Epistle to the Ephesians. By Rev. H. C. G. Moule, B.D. " It seems to us the model of a School and College Commentary — comprehensive, but not cumbersome; scholarly, but not pedantic." — Baptist Magazine. The Epistle to the Philippians. "There are few series more valued by theological students than 'The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges,' and there will be no number of it more esteemed than that by Mr H. C. G. Moule on the Epistle to the Philippians." — Record. Thessalonians. "It will stand the severest scrutiny, for no volume in this admirable series exhibits more careful work, and Mr Findlay is a true expositor, who keeps in mind what he is expounding, and for whom he is expounding it. — Expository Times. "Mr Findlay maintains the high level of the series to which he has become contributor. Some parts of his introduction to the Epistles to the Thessalonians could scarcely be bettered. The account of Thessa lonica, the description of the style and character of the Epistles, and the analysis of them are excellent in style and scholarly care. The notes are possibly too voluminous ; but there is so much matter in them, and the matter is arranged and handled so ably, that we are ready to forgive their fulness Mr FlNDLAY's commentary is a valuable addition to what has been written on the letters to the Thessalonian Church." — Academy. "Of all the volumes of this most excellent series, none is better done, and few are so well done as this small volume.... From begin ning to end the volume is marked by accurate grammatical scholarship, delicate appreciation of the apostle's meaning, thorough investigation 6 CAMBRIDGE BIBLE FOR SCHOOLS 6V COLLEGES. of all matters open to doubt, extensive reading, and deep sympathy with the spiritual aim of these epistles. It is, on the whole, the best commentary on the Thessalonians which has yet appeared, and its small price puts it within reach of all. We heartily recommend it." — Methodist Recorder. "Mr Findlay has fulfilled in this volume a task which Dr Moulton was compelled to decline, though he has rendered valuable aid in its pre paration. The commentary is in its own way a model — clear, forceful, scholarly — such as young students will welcome as a really useful guide, and old ones will acknowledge as giving in brief space the substance of all that they knew." — Baptist Magazine. Hebrews. " Like his (Canon Farrar's) commentary on Luke it possesses all the best characteristics of his writing. It is a work not only of an accomplished scholar, but of a skilled teacher." — Baptist Magazine. The Epistles of St John. By the Rev. A. Plummer, D.D. "This forms an admirable companion to the 'Commentary on the Gospel according to St John, ' which was reviewed in The Churchman as soon as it appeared. Dr Plummer has some of the highest qualifica tions for such a task ; and these two volumes, their size being considered, will bear comparison with the best Commentaries of the time." — The Churchman. Revelation. "This volume contains evidence of much careful labour. It is a scholarly production, as might be expected from the pen of the late Mr W. H. SlMCOX.,..The notes throw light upon many passages of this difficult book, and are extremely suggestive. It is an advantage that they sometimes set before the student various interpre tations without exactly guiding him to a choice." — Guardian. "Mr Simcox has treated his very difficult subject with that con scious care, grasp and lucidity which characterises everything he wrote." — Modern Church. W$z Smaller ©ambrfogE Mbh for ^rfjools. ' ' We can only repeal what we have already said of this admirable series, containing, as it does, the scholarship of the larger work. For scholars in our elder classes, and for those preparing for Scripture exami nations, no better commentaries can be put into their hands." — Sunday- School Chronicle. ' ' Despite their small size, these volumes give the substance of the admirable pieces of work on which they are founded. We can only hope that in many schools the class-teaching will proceed on the lines these com mentators suggest." — Record. " We should be glad to hear that this series has been introduced into many of our Sunday-Schools, for which it is so admirably adapted'' — Christian Leader. "¦All that is necessary to be known and learned by pupils in junior and elementary schools is to be found in this series. Indeed, much more is provided than should be required by the examiners. We do not know what more could be done to provide sensible, interesting, and solid Scrip tural instruction for boys and girls. The Syndics of the Cambridge OPINIONS OF THE PRESS. University Press are rendering great services both to teachers and to scholars by the publication of such a valuable series of books, in which slipshod work could not have a place." — Literary World. "For the student ofthe sacred oracles who utilizes hours of travel or moments of waiting in the perusal of the Bible tha-e is nothing so handy, and, at the same time, so satisfying as these little books Nor let anyone suppose that, because these are school-books, therefore they are beneath the adult reader. They contain the very ripest results of the best Biblical scholarship, and that in the very simplest form."— Christian Leader. " Altogether one of the most perfect examples of a Shilling New Tes tament commentary which even this age of cheapness is likely to produce." Samuel I. and II. "Professor Kirkpatrick's two tiny volumes on the First and Second Books of Samuel are quite model school-books ; the notes elucidate every possible difficulty with scholarly brevity and clearness and a perfect knowledge of the subject." — Saturday Review. ' ' They consist of an introduction full of matter, clearly and succinctly given, and of notes which appear to us to be admirable, at once full and brief." — Church Times. Kings I. " We can cordially recommend this little book. The Intro duction discusses the question of authorship and date in a plain but scholarly fashion, while the footnotes throughout are brief, pointed, and helpful." — Review of Reviews. St Matthew. " The notes are terse, clear, and helpful, and teachers and students cannot fail to find the volume of great service." — Publishers' Circular. St Mark. St Luke. " We have received the volumes of St Mark and St Luke in this series.... The two volumes seem, on the whole, well adapted for school use, are well and carefully printed, and have maps and good, though necessarily brief, introductions. There is little doubt that this series will be found as popular and useful as the well-known larger series, of which they are abbreviated editions." — Guardian. St Luke. "We cannot too highly commend this handy little book to all teachers." — Wesleyan Methodist Sunday-School Record. St John. "We have been especially interested in Mr Plummer's treatment ofthe Gospel which has been entrusted to his charge. He is con cise, comprehensive, interesting, and simple. Youngstudents of this illim itable book, as well as elder students, even ministers and teachers, may use it with advantage as a very serviceable handbook. " — Literary World. "A model of condensation, losing nothing of its clearness and force from its condensation into a small compass. Many who have long since completed their college curriculum will find it an invaluable handbook." — Methodist Times. Acts. "The notes are very brief, but exceedingly comprehensive, comprising as much detail in the way of explanation as would be needed by young students of the Scriptures preparing for examination. We again give the opinion that this series furnishes as much real help as would usually satisfy students for the Christian ministry, or even minis ters themselves." — Literary World. THE CAMBRIDGE GREEK TESTAMENT FOR SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES with a Revised Text, based on the most recent critical authorities, and English Notes. " Has achieved an excellence which puts it above criticism." — Expositor. St Matthew. " Copious illustrations, gathered from a great variety of sources, make his notes a very valuable aid to the student. They are indeed remarkably interesting, while all explanations on meanings, applications, and the like are distinguished by their lucidity and good sense." — Pall Mall Gazette. St Mark. "Dr Maclear's introduction contains all that is known of St Mark's life; an account ofthe circumstances in which the Gospel was composed, with an estimate of the influence of St Peter's teaching upon St Mark ; an excellent sketch of the special characteristics of this Gospel; an analysis, and a chapter on the text of the New Testament generally. " — Saturday Review. St Luke. "Of this second series we have a new volume by Archdeacon Farrar on St Luke, completing the four Gospels. ...It gives us in clear and beautiful language the best results of modern scholarship. We have a most attractive Introduction. Then follows a sort of composite Greek text, representing fairly and in very beautiful type the consensus of modern textual critics. At the beginning of the exposition of each chapter of the Gospel are a few short critical notes giving the manuscript evidence for such various readings as seem to deserve mention. The expository notes are short, but clear and helpful. For young students and those who are not disposed to buy or to study the much more costly work of Godet, this seems to us to be the best book on the Greek Text ofthe Third Gospel."— Methodist Recorder. St John. "We take this opportunity of recommending to ministers on probation, the very excellent volume of the same series on this part of the New Testament. We hope that most or all of our young ministers will prefer to study the volume in the Cambridge Greek Testament for Schools." — Methodist Recorder. The Acts of the Apostles. "Professor Lumby has performed his laborious task well, and supplied us with a commentary the fulness and freshness of which Bible students will not be slow to appreciate. The volume is enriched with the usual copious indexes and four coloured maps." — Glasgow Herald. I. Corinthians. "Mr Lias is no novice in New Testament exposi tion, and the present series of essays and notes is an able and helpful addition to the existing books." — Guardian. The Epistles of St John. "In the very useful and well annotated series of the Cambridge Greek Testament the volume on the Epistles of St John must hold a high position.... The notes are brief, well informed and intelligent. " — Scotsman. CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED BY C. J. CLAY, M.A. AND SONS, AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS.