•I -m YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ALBERT H CHILDS YALE '61 MEMORIAL COLLECTION ur Id The New View of Hell. THE New View of Hell ITS NATURE, WHEREABOUTS, DURATION, AND HOW TO ESCAPE IT. BY B. F. BARRETT, AUTHOR OF "Lectures on the New Dispensation," "The Golden City/ "Letters to Beecher on the Divine Trinitv," Etc. Etc jtftb mmm. PHILADELPHIA: THE SWEDENBORG PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION. 900 Chestnut Street. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1871, by J. B. LIPPINCOTT & CO., In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washintfton. CONTENTS. PAGB L — The New Dispensation 9 II. — The Old Doctrine of Hell 26 III. — The New View 36 IV. — The Scripture Argument. — Sheol, Hades, Gehenna, and the Lake of Fire .... 46 V. — Hell. — The Chosen Home of All Who GO There 73 VI. — The Duration of Hell 87 VII. — Some Evidence of its Duration. — Philo sophical AND Scriptural 100 VIII. — PVbt Cannot the Ruling Love be Changed After Death ? 112 IX. — Displays of the Divine Benignity in Hell 125 X. — Is Hell to Undergo any Change? If so, of what Nature ? 145 XI. — The Devil and Satan 163 XII. — Practical Bearings of the Question.... 177 XIII. — How TO Escape Hell 193 5 PREFACE. There are few subjects within the compass of revealed or speculative Theology, upon which inquiring minds have been more exercised within the last hundred years, than the sub ject of Hell. And there are few, perhaps, which have been the occasion of more strifes and divisions in the churches, which have caused more trouble to Christian believers, or upon which there are at this moment more anxiety, doubt and disagreement among religious teachers themselves. There is no doubt that the popular mind of Christendom has undergone a considerable change on this, as on many other subjects, since the commencement of the present cen tury. The old representations of the Divine justice, and of the condition of the wicked in the great Hereafter, would hardly be listened to with patience — -certainly not with satis faction — by any intelligent Christian congregation of to-day. "The idea which men once had of hell and of divine jus tice," says the occupant of a distinguished orthodox pulpit, "was a nightmare as hideous as was ever begotten by the hellish brood itself And it was an atrocious slander on God. I do not wonder that men have reacted from these horrors — I honor them for it." 7 8 PREFACE. But what have the Christian teachers of to-day to offer as a substitute for the old idea, which is confessedly becoming obsolete in nearly all of the churches ? Many of them, nothing — literally nothing, that can af once satisfy the reason of thoughtful inquirers, and meet the demands of the lan guage of Scripture. And some are frank enough tp confess their destitution. Said a distinguished Presbyterian clergy man, writing on this subject some time ago : " It is all dark, dark, dark, to my soul ; and I cannot disguise it." The aim of the present work is to unfold and present tht New view of Hell, as set forth in the theological writings of Emanuel Swedenborg ; to show that it is at once rational and Scriptural, in harmony with the perfect love and wisdom of God, as well as with the teachings of human experience and the profoundest spiritual philosophy ; and that its prac tical influence upon the character of believers, cannot be otherwise than beneficent. How far I have succeeded in this, the reader himself must judge. But if I have achieved even a partial success, and presented the subject in a light to relieve and profit only a few troubled souls, I shall be more than satisfied — I shall be thankful. B. F. B. Germantown, Jan. 14, 1878. THE New View of Hell. I. THE NEW DISPENSATION. '' I ^HE theological writings of Emanuel Swedenborg are ^ regarded by many — by all, indeed, who have read and studied them with care — as a new revelation. They boldly claim for themselves this distinction, and chal lenge a candid examination of their claim in the light of Scripture, reason, philosophy, history, and all human experience. They are held to be (and this, too, is their own claim) a new Dispensation of spiritual . truth : that Dispensation referred to in the Apocalypse under the symbol of the New Jerusalem which John saw coming down from God out of heaven. They are believed to contain, not raerely the reasonings and conclusions of a great and pious mind — not a theological or doctrinal system wrought out by patient labor and hard study, but a system of spiritual truth so luminous in its nature and so grand in its proportions, as to be itself the fulfillment of the prophecy concerning the second coming of Him IO NEW VIEW OF HELL. who is "the Light of the world." They are declared to be a revelation of new and heavenly truth made by the Lord himself through his own chosen servant, whom He raised up and prepared for this work, and in due time graciously and wonderfully illumined by his Spirit. The stupendous system of truth, therefore, contained in the writings of this man, is not to be considered his, but the Lord's. He was but the chosen instrument to receive and make known to men, truths which no amount of labor or study could ever have enabled him to dis cover. Hear what the seer himself says on this subject : "Since the Lord cannot manifest Himself in Person, and nevertheless has foretold that He would come and establish a New Church which is the New Jerusalem, it follows that He will do so by means of a man who can not only receive these doctrines in his understanding but can also publish them by the press. " That the Lord manifested Himself before me his servant, and sent me to this office, that He afterward opened the eyes of my spirit and so intromitted me into the spiritual world, granted me to see the heavens and the hells, also to converse with angels and spirits, and this continuously now for several years, I affirm in truth ; as also, that, from the first day of that calling I have not received anything whatever pertaining to the doctrines of that Church from any angel, but from the Lord alone while I read the Word." {True Christian Religion, 779.) And elsewhere in his writings he repeats the same THE NEW DISPENSATION. ll Statement — in substance if not in words. Thus in his preface to the Apocalypse Revealed, he says : "Any one may see that the Apocalypse could no how be explained but by the Lord alone, since every word of it contains arcana which never could be known with out some special illumination and consequent revelation. Wherefore it has pleased the Lord to open the sight of my spirit and to teach me. It must not, therefore, be supposed that I have given any explication of my own, nor that even of any angel, but only what I have had communicated to me from the Lord alone." And in his treatise on "The Intercourse between the Soul and the Body," he relates a conversation that he once had with "a man of reason," explaining to him how it was that from a philosopher he became a theolo gian. After telling him that it was " for the same reason that fishermen became the disciples and apostles of the Lord," adding that he also " from early youth had been a spiritual fisherman;" and after explaining what this means, and confirming what he says by citing passages from the Word which speak oi fishermen, unfolding at the same time their spiritual meaning, his interrogator " raised his voice and said : "'Now I can understand why the Lord called and chose fishermen to be his disciples ; and therefore I do not wonder that He has also called and chosen you, since, as you have observed, you were from early youth a fisherman in a spiritual sense, that is, an investigator 12 NEW VIEW OF HELL. of natural truths. The reason that you are now become an investigator of spiritual truths, is, that these are founded on the former.' To this he added, being a man of reason, that ' the Lord alone knows who is the proper person to apprehend and teach or communicate the truths which should be revealed for his New Church.' "—Ibid. 20. Swedenborg further claims that this new revelation made through him as a chosen medium, is in fulfillment of the prediction made by the Lord himself, concerning his second coming, which was to be in the clouds of heaven. This coming, he says, is not to be external and natural, cognizable by the eye of sense ; but internal and spiritual, cognizable by the understanding and the heart. It is to be a coming of the Word of God, that is, of the deeper meanings of the Word — a coming of its spiritual or heavenly sense to the minds and hearts of men, and exerting upon them a new and renovating power. And the clouds in or upon which it is said He would come, are the clouds of Scripture — the obscurities, more or less dense, of the literal sense, in or upon which the spiritual and true sense comes as the sun's light through a cloud. To cite again his own language : "It is the prevailing opinion at this day [1770] in every church, that the Lord, when He comes to the last judgment, will appear in the clouds of heaven with angels and the sound of trumpets ; that He will gather together all who are then dwelling on the earth, as well THE NEW DISPENSATION. 13 as all who are deceased, and will separate the evil from the good, as a shepherd separates the goats from the sheep ; that then He will cast the evil, or the goats, into hell, and raise up the good, or the sheep, into heaven ; and further that He will, at the same time, create a new visible heaven and a new habitable earth, and on the latter He will cause a city to descend, which is to be called the New Jerusalem, and is to be built according to the de scription given in the Revelation (Ch. xxi.) of jasper and gold ; and the foundation of its walls of every precious stone ; and its height, breadth and length to be equal, each twelve thousand furlongs ; and that all the elect are to be gathered together into this city, both those that are then alive, and those that have died since the beginning of the world ; and that the latter will then return into their bodies, and enjoy everlasting bliss in that magnifi cent city, as in their heaven. This is the prevailing opinion of the present day, in all Christian churches, respecting the coming of the Lord and the last judg ment." — True Christian Religion, n. 768. And a little further on he says : "That the second coming of the Lord, is a coming, not in person, but in the Word ¦which is from Him, and /r Himself. — It is written in many places that the Lord will come in the clouds of heaven; as Matt. xvii. 5; xxiv. 30; xxvi. 64; Mark xiv. 62; Luke ix. 34, 35; xxi. 27; Rev. i. 7; xiv. 14; Dan. vii. 13; but no one has here tofore known what is meant by the clouds of heaven, 2 14 NEW VIEW OF HELL. and hence mankind have believed that the Lord will appear to them in person. But it has remained undis covered to this day, that the Word in its literal sense is meant by the clouds of heaven ; and that the spiritual sense of the Word is meant by the power and glory in which also the Lord is to come. . . . Now since the spiritual sense of the Word has been opened to me by the Lord, and it has been granted me to be with angels and spirits in their world as one of themselves, it has been revealed to me that the clouds of heaven sig nify the Word in its natural sense ; and glory, the Word in its spiritual sense ; and power, the effectual operation of the Lord by the Word." — Ibid., n. 776. There can be no doubt, then, about Swedenborg's claim — extraordinary though it be, and incredible as it may seem to those who have not examined his writings. He claims to have been called of the Lord in an extra ordinary manner, and to have been specially illumined by his Spirit, to make a new revelation ; — a revelation, that is, of new and heavenly truth concerning Himself, his Word, the nature of heaven and hell, and the con dition of different classes of men in the great Hereafter. He declares that it is the Lord who opened the eyes of his spirit ; that it is the Lord who taught him the true meaning of the Word, and what doctrines to promul gate ; that the Lord had actually come (agreeably to his promise), to establish a New Church by means of the doctrines which it was given him to receive, understand THE NEW DISPENSATION. 15 and publish, to the world ; that these doctrines were not his own — not the result of any labor or study on his part, nor received from any angel, but communicated to him by the Lord alone. "From the first day of that calling," he says, "I have not received anything what ever pertaining to the doctrines of the New Church from any angel, but from the Lord alone while I read the Word." It is not my purpose here to enter upon any discussion of this claim, or to adduce evidence to show that it is well founded. The need there was of a new revelation at the time Swedenborg lived and wrote, as shown by the doctrinal beliefs and teachings in all the churches of his day; the luminous and extraordinary character of his theological writings; the sweet and heavenly and catholic spirit that they breathe throughout ; the elevated and ra tional views they contain on all subjects — views that har monize with the teachings of Scripture and reason and science, and with all we know of the laws of the human soul and the ways and workings of God's providence ; — all these combine to force an acknowledgment of his claim from every intelligent and candid mind who thor oughly examines and understands his writings. Such an one admits his claim because he cannot help it. He finds the evidence so overwhelming, that it is easier to accept than to reject it. He sees that here is, indeed, a new revelation ; that here is a system of spiritual truth so grand and harmonious and rational, so comprehensive 1 6 AEW VIEW OF HELL. and majestic, and so admirably adapted to human wants in this age, that it could have none other than God him self for its author. He accepts Swedenborg's teachings, therefore, as a new Dispensation of spiritual truth, bear ing the impress of God's own finger. So abundant and overmastering is the evidence, that he cannot do other wise ; he cannot reach any other conclusion. But those cannot admit his claim, who have not studied his writings. How can they ? — for they have not weighed the evidence; they have not seen it, indeed. And no where but in his writings themselves, can satisfactory evi dence of his claim be found. They may, from having read a few pages or chapters of his works, admit that he saw and taught much truth ; but we cannot expect them to go beyond this — nor ought they — until they have studied his writings sufficiently to enable them to discern, in some measure, their wondrous depth and comprehensiveness and philosophy and unity. Such persons, (and they are not a few) stand toward this New Christian Dispensation in the same attitude as those stand toward the first Chris tian dispensation, who admit that Jesus Christ was a wise and excellent man, and that much truth is to be found in the New Testament ; but who do not admit the proper divinity of the one, nor the inspiration of the other ; who regard the Saviour as a merely finite and human being, and the writings of the Evangelists as merely human compositions. And while some of these persons may have more of the spirit of Christ than mani who THE NEW DISPENSATION. 17 know and believe more of Him and his gospel, still they would not be regarded, popularly or doctrinally speak ing, as Christians ; for they do not acknowledge Chris tianity as a new Dispensation, or in any proper sense as a new Revelation. So, popularly speaking, those are not of the New Christian Dispensation (they may belong to it really but not nominally^ who do not see or acknowledge that any such dispensation has commenced, or that the writings of Swedenborg are, indeed, a new and divinely authorized revelation of heavenly truth — though they may have in their hearts more 'of the spirit and life of the New Church than some who accept its doc trines. But many persons — and these inhabiting the most en lightened portions of Christendom — are beginning to admit that Swedenborg's claim is well founded. They believe that he wrote under a special divine illumination, and that his writings are or contain a new revelation. And what is implied by this admission ? That no mis take, however trivial, is anywhere to be found in his writ ings ? That in every sentence and word he penned aftei his illumination, he was immediately directed by th( Lord ? That every word he wrote is as certainly true as ii it had been written by the finger of God himself? Noth ing of this sort is involved in the fullest and most cordial admission of his claim. We may admit his divine illumin ation; we may believe that he was enlightened and taught 1 8 NEW VIEW OF HELL. of God as no other man ever was ; and that his writings are, as they claim to be, a new and divinely authorized reve lation ; and yet we may believe that his illumination was not precisely the same at all times ; that he was not absolutely infallible ; that his pen, and even his thought on some minor points, might momentarily have slipped, making him teach or seem to teach in one place, some thing contrary to his general teaching upon the same subject. But an admission of this man's claim, or the belief that his writings are a new dispensation of spiritual truth to men, does involve the belief, that, upon all important doctrines — ^upon all questions which have hitherto en gaged the attention of Christians, and in which they are likely always to feel a deep interest — he has spoken with authority, because he wrote under an extraordinary divine illumination.' It involves the admission that, in what he wrote and published concerning the Lord, the Sacred Scripture, Redemption, Regeneration, Salvation, the Resurrection, the Judgment, the nature and duration of Heaven and Hell, and all the great facts and laws of the spiritual world, he has not given us his opinion merely, bnt the truth which God was pleased to reveal through him. It involves the belief that, upon such momentous themes he was illumined by the Holy Spirit, and has taught only what the Lord authorized and directed him to teach. So that what his writings contain on such subjects, is not his own opinions or conclusions merely. THE NEW DISPENSATION 19 but is what the Lord himself teaches or is trying to teach mankind through him. Let me endeavor to make my view more clear by an illustration : — A man is duly accredited by our government to the court of St. James. Upon all important matters between the two countries, he receives his instruction from Wash ington. And if he acts according to his instruction, the things he does as the authorized agent of the govern ment, are not to be regarded merely as his acts, but the acts of the government ; and the government alone is responsible for them. But in carrying on some negotia tion, Mr. Adams or Mr. Motley, in the exercise of the freedom and discretion of a plenipotentiary, may here and there drop a word or use an expression which his government might not approve ; but that is of small con sequence if it does not prevent nor in any way interfere with the negotiation. He may not, in every interview with the British minister of foreign affairs, or at every court dinner, do and say exactly the thing that the gov ernment from which he is accredited would approve ; but if he carries out his instructions generally, does his duty faithfully, and so accomplishes the purpose of his mission, is he any the less the accredited American min ister, or his acts any the less cheerfully endorsed by his government because of an occasional and unimportant remark made by him, which the. authorities at Wash mgton might not approve ? 20 NEW VIEW OF HELL. So Swedenborg — though it might be shown that he has here and there said things, unimportant in themselves but not in agreement with the general tenor of his teaching — is to be regarded as none the less a divinely accredited teacher or a divinely authorized expounder of sacred mysteries, if his teaching upon all important and funda mental points be true, or such as meets the approval of heaven's own King. But though it is, or claims to be, a New Dispensation, it is a dispensation of rational religious truth. It ad dresses us as rational beings, endowed with the capacity of discriminating between right and wrong — truth and falsehood. It declares that Rationality, or the ability to understand spiritual truth when presented, and to judge between it and error, is one of the noblest gifts of God. And it holds it to be every one's solemn duty to respect this gift, by faithfully exercising his own understanding upon whatever is offered him for religious truth. It teaches that no one ought to accept what his own under standing rejects, even though it should be proclaimed by a messenger from heaven, or have the unanimous vote of all Christendom in its support. No one, therefore, is expected to receive for truth what Swedenborg has taught on any subject, unless the teach ing approve itself to his rational intuitions ; t'nat is, un less he himself sees it to be true. Each one must use his own eyes, and not allow another to see for him. The great seer himself says : THE NEW DISPENSATION. 3 1 "This tenet, that the understanding is to be kept in subjection to faith, is rejected in the New Church ; and in its place, this is to be received as a maxim, that the truth of the church should be seen in order that it may be believed. . . . What is truth not seen, but a voice not understood?" And again he says: "The angels have wisdom in consequence of seeing truths. Where fore when it is said to any angel that this or that is to be believed although it is not understood, the angel replies. Do you suppose me to be insane, or that you yourself are a god whom I am bound to believe?" This Dispensation, moreover, is catholic, comprehen sive, universal, in its spirit. It breathes throughout the sweetest charity. It inculcates the largest liberty of thought. It encourages the utmost freedom of religious inquiry. It asserts with new and increased emphasis the great Protestant principle — the right of private judgment in matters of faith, however that judgment may differ from the solemn decree of popes, prelates, councils, synods, assemblies or conventions. It upholds, there fore, and furnishes new and powerful weapons in defence of religious liberty. It is tolerant of all forms of error, innocently imbibed and conscientiously held, and shows the possibility of salvation under all of them. It con demns no individual, no sect, no people — not even Ma hometans or Pagans — merely on account of their beliefs ; but teaches that infinite Love is for ever brooding over all ; and for ever seeking, through such forms of fni'-h 22 NEW VIEW OF HELL. and modes of worship as are best suited to the wants of each, to lift them up into clearer light and a higher life — into fuller communion and sweeter fellowship with itself. It is full, therefore — this New Dispensation — of the all-embracing and all-reconciling spirit of the Lord. The following extracts — and a volume of similar ones might be quoted from the writings of Swedenborg — will exhibit something of the large and catholic spirit of this New Dispensation : — "Notwithstanding there are so many various and dif ferent doctrines [believed by Christians], still, if all who hold these doctrines did but acknowledge charity as the essential of the church, or what is the same, if they had respect to life as the end of doctrine, they would to gether form one church ; . . . for every one in the other life is gifted with a lot from the Lord according to the good of his life, not according to the truth of his doctrine separate from that good." — Arcana Cxlestia 3241. "If charity were in the first place and faith in the second, the church would have another face. For then, none would be called Christians but they who lived the life of charity. Then, too, there would not be many churches distinguished by their different opinions con cerning the truths of faith ; but the church would be called one, containing all those who are in the good of life."— Ibid. 6761. "Schisms and heresies would never have arisen if THE NEW DISPENSATION. 23 charity had continued to live and rule in the church. For then they would not have called schism by the name of schism, nor heresy by the name of heresy ; but they would have called them doctrinals agreeable to each one's particular opinion or way of thinking, which they would have left to his individual conscience ; not judging or condemning any for their opinions, provided they did not deny fundamental principles — that is, the Lord, eternal life, and the Word — and maintained nothing con trary to the commandments of the decalogue. "^Ibid. 1834. " He who is in goodness of life does not condemn another because he differs from him in opinion, but leaves it to his faith and conscience ; and he extends this rule even to those who are out of the church — [those, that is, in heathen lands]. For he says in his heart that ignorance cannot condemn any, if they live in innocence and mutual love." — Ibid. 4468. " Within the church there are some of all denomina tions who have a conscience ; though their conscience, however, is more perfect according as the truths which form it approach nearer the genuine truths of faith." — Ibid. 2053. "Every one, of whatsoever religion he be, may be saved — even the Gentiles who have no truths from the Word — if only he has had regard to the good of life as an end." — Ibid. 10648. "Let this truth be accepted and confirmed in the out- 24 NEW VIEW OF HELL. set, that love to the Lord and charity toward the bor are the essentials of all doctrine and worship, then heresies would be no more ; and one church would be formed out of many, however they might differ in doc trine and ritual. ... In this case, all would be gov erned as one man by the Lord ; for they would be like the members and organs of one body, wLich, though dissimilar in form and function, still have reference to one heart, on which they all depend both in general and in particular, however various their forms. Then, too, every one would say of another, in whatsoever doc trine or external worship he might be. This is my broth er ; I see that he worships the Lord, and that he is a good man." — Ibid. 2385. " Persons in a blind or persuasive faith, since they do not see truths, are not willing that the doctrines of their church should be approached and examined rationally with the understanding ; but they say that these are to be received from a principle of obedience, which is called the obedience of faith ; and it is not known whether the things received in such blind obedience be true or false ; nor can they open the way to heaven, for in heaven nothing but what is seen, that is, understood, is acknow ledged as truth." — Apocalypse Explained iioo. "The dogma that the understanding is to be kept in subjection to faith, is rejected in the New Church ; and in its place this is to be received as a maxim, that the truth of the church should be seen in order that it may be be- THE NEW DISPENSATION. 25 lieved ; and truth cannot be seen otherwise than ration ally. How can any man be led by the Lord and con joined to heaven, who shuts his understanding against such things as relate to salvation and eternal life ? Is it not the understanding that is to be illumined and in structed? And what is the understanding closed by religion but thick darkness, and such darkness, too, as rejects the light that would illumine?" — Apocalypse Re vealed 564. These quotations might be extended indefinitely. But the reader may gather from the few here given, some thing of the large, free, tolerant and truly catholic spirit of this new Dispensation. And if we recognize in nearly all the churches of to-day, a steady increase of this same spirit, that is only additional evidence that "old things" — the old bigotry, narrowness, intolerance, denominational hatreds, and high partition walls of the last century — are passing away, and a new and more truly Christ-like spirit taking their place ; agreeably to the Divine promise: "And he that sat upon the throne said. Behold I make all things new." 3 n. THE OLD DOCTRINE OF HELL. A /T ORE than a hundred years ago, Swedenborg an- •^'-'- nounced the end or consummation of the first Christian Church or Dispensation, and the commence ment of a new one. Repeatedly, and in the calmest and most emphatic language, did he declare that the Lord had manifested Himself to him in person ; had opened his spiritual senses ; had permitted him to see and con verse with the denizens of the other world as men see and converse with each other ; had vouchsafed to him a clear understanding of the spiritual and true meaning of the Sacred Scripture ; and had authorized and directed him to make a new revelation of heavenly truth for the instruction of all Christians and for the benefit of man kind. Up to this time comparatively few have openly em braced this new revelation. Yet its power has been seen and its influence felt in the gradual and steady modifica tion of the old theological beliefs, which has been going on in nearly all of the sects for the last hundred years. This is admitted by some of the keenest observers and 26 THE OLD DOCTRINE. 2^ most advanced thinkers in all the churches. Says a learned critic of rare candor in the New York Independ ent (March i8, 1869) : ' ' More than any other form of religious thought, Swe- denborgianism is a leaven 'hid in three measures of meal.' To a careless reader of ecclesiastical statistics, the Swedenborgian Church would seem to be one of the least of the great household of faith. To a careful stu dent of religious thought, it appears to be among the most important. It has made very few converts from the faith of orthodoxy; but it has materially modified that faith. . . . As a little salt changes the contents of a large vessel of water, so Swedenborgianism, seemingly lost in the great multitude of churches, has more or less modi fied the form of faith of all." And this very candid writer, and careful observer of the theological and religious tendencies of these new times, specifies some of the modifications already wrought in the old theological beliefs by the teachings of Sweden borg. After referring to the old doctrines of the Trin ity, the Atonement, and the Sacred Scripture, and show ing how these have been already modified by the writings of the Swedish seer, he concludes his list of specifica tions thus : "The church [meaning all the so-called orthodox de nominations] holds fast to the solemn truth, which no one has ever taught more vividly than Christ himself, that after death is the judgment, and after judgment heaven 28 NEW VIEW OF HELL. and hell ; but it has accepted, unconsciously, from Swe denborg, his teaching that every man carries heaven or hell in his own bosom ; and remits to the Past the fear ful pictures of Edwards and his cotemporaries, of literal torments and a remorseless and pitiless God." And with equal truth and plainness (though with a little less candor, perhaps, in not hinting at the real cause) the distinguished pastor of Plymouth Church (Brooklyn), said in a sermon on "Future Punishment" preached some months ago : " that the educated Christian mind of all lands, for the last hundred years [note the period] has been changing" in regard to the nature of punish ment in the great Hereafter. "It is certainly true," he continues, "that theories have been changing from gross material representations [of hell], more and more in the direction of moral repre sentations. It is very true that this subject is not preached as it used to be— not as it was in my childhood. It has not been preached so often, nor with the same fiery and familiar boldness that it used to be. Multitudes of men who give every evidence of being spiritual, regenerate, devout, laborious and self-denying, find themselves straitened in their minds in respect to this question, and are turning anxiously every whither to see whence relief may come to them. There has been a profound change [within the last hundred years, observe] in the sentiment of Christendom in regard to those gross rep resentations of future punishment, which were handed THE OLD DOCTRINE. 29 down to us from the past. ' ' And he gives, as among the reasons of those gross representations, "the mediseval literalization of the Bible figures." Now, to judge correctly of the need there was of a new revelation a hundred years ago, we should go back to the time when Swedenborg wrote, and see what were the then accepted teachings upon the various points of Christian theology. Since that time the be liefs of Christians have, through the light of the New Dispensation (which is "as the lightning that cometh out of the east and shineth even unto the west"), be come so modified, that, on many subjects, they bear but little resemblance to those held previous to that time. Very few are aware of the changes in theological opinion that have taken place in nearly all the churches during the last hundred years, and that are still going on at a rapid pace ; and fewer still are aware of the cause of these changes. Take, for illustration, the doctrine concerning hell, or the future punishment of the wicked. At the time Sweden borg wrote, the commonly received doctrine in all the churches was according to the literal teaching of the Bible. It was believed and taught for Christian verity that hell is literally a lake of fire and brimstone ; — a place created by the Lord at the beginning for the ex- ^.ress purpose of inflicting upon all who die in their sins as much suffering as infinite ingenuity could possibly de vise. It was held that sinners, after death, were to be 3* 30 NEW VIEW OF HELL. cast alive into this burning lake by order of the Supreme Judge of the universe, as criminals on earth are cast into prison by order of the judges of criminal courts. And that they were always to remain there, perfectly con scious, indued with the most exquisite sensibility to pain, forever burning yet never consumed, writhing and groaning in eternal agony. And as if this were not tor ment enough, the gross imaginations of religious teachers often added other horrors equally revolting. Mr. Buckle, in his History of Civilization in England, speaking of the clergy of the seventeenth century — especially the Scotch clergy — and their view of hell and its torments, says : " In the pictures which they drew, they reproduced and heightened the barbarous imagery of a barbarous age. They delighted in telling their hearers that they would be roasted in great fires and hung up by their tongues. They were to be lashed with scorpions, and see their companions writhing and howling around them. They were to be thrown into boiling oil and scalding lead. A river of brimstone broader than the earth was prepared for them ; in that they were to be immersed. . . . Such were the first stages of suffering, and they were only the first. For the torture, besides being unceasing, was to become gradually worse. So refined was the cruelty, that one hell was succeeded by another ; and, lest the sufferer should grow callous, he was, after a time, moved on, that he might undergo fresh agonies in fresh places, provision being made that the torment should not pall THE OLD DOCTRINE. 31 on the sense, but should be varied in its character as well as eternal in its duration. " All this was the work of the God of the Scotch clergy. It was not only his work, it was his joy and his pride. For, according to them, hell was created before man came into the world ; the Almighty, they did not scruple to say, having spent his previous leisure in preparing and completing this place of torture, so that, when the human race appeared, it might be ready for their reception. Ample, however, as the arrangements were, they were in sufficient ; and hell not being big enough to contain the countless victims incessantly poured into it, had, in these latter days, been enlarged. But in that vast expanse there was no void, for the whole of it reverberateitwith the shrieks and yells of undying agony. . . . Both chil dren and fathers made hell echo with their piercing screams, writhing in convulsive agony at the torments which they suffered, and knowing that other torments more grievous still were reserved for them." (Vol. II. pp. 294, 295.) Now every statement that Mr. Buckle here makes, finds ample confirmation in the works of distinguished theologians of that period and some of the previous cen turies. Rutherford in his Religious Letters, speaking of the future punishment of the wicked, says: "Tongue, lungs and liver, bones and all, shall boil and fry in a tor turing fire" (p. 17); — "a river of fire and brimstone broader than the earth." (p. 35.) And Boston, in his 32 NEW VIEW OF HELL. Human Nature in its Fourfold State, treating of this sam ,• subject, says: " They will be universal torments, every part of the creature being tormented in that flame. When one is cast into a fiery furnace, the fire makes its way into the very bowels, and leaves no member untouched : what part then can have ease when the damned swim in a lake of fire burning with brimstone?" (p. 458.) And Rev. Thomas Halyburton, in his Great Concern of Salvation, says : " Consider, Who is the contriver of these torments. There have been some very exquisite torments contrived by the wit of men, the naming of which, if ye under stood their nature, were enough to fill your hearts with horror ; but all these fall as far short of the torments ye are to endure, as the wisdom of man falls short of that of God." (p. 154, Edinburgh edit., 1722.) Such was the generally accepted doctrine concerning hell in all the Christian churches at the time Sweden borg wrote. Such, too, had been the doctrine for cen turies previous, as we learn from Christian writers and Christian artists. These latter aimed to embody or repre sent upon canvas the prevalent Christian thought of the period in which they lived. Thus Michael Angelo, in his picture of the Last J^udgment, tells us more plainly than words could tell, what idea Christians of his day had of the future punishment of the wicked. Truly did Mr. Beecher say in one of his sermons not long ago : "If you will take this picture, you will better under stand what was the real feeling of the age in which he THE OLD DOCTRINE. 33 lived on the subject of reward and punishment, than by reading any amount of theological treatises. Let any one look at that ; let any one see the enormous gigantic coils of fiends and men ; let any one look at that defiant Christ that stands like a superb athlete at the front, hurling his enemies from him and calling his friends toward him as Hercules might have done ; let any one look upon that hideous wriggling mass that goes plung ing down through the air — serpents and men and beasts of every nauseous kind, mixed together ; let him look at the lower parts of the picture, where with pitchforks men are by devils being cast into caldrons and into burn ing fires, where hateful fiends are gnawing the skulls of suffering sinners, and where there is hellish cannibalism going on — let a man look at that picture and the scenes which it depicts, and he sees what were the ideas which men once had of hell and of divine justice. It was a nightmare as hideous as was ever begotten by the hellish brood itself; and it was an atrocious slander on God. . . . I do not wonder that men have reacted from these horrors — I honor them for it. ' ' {Plymouth Pulpit for Oct. 29, 1870.) And this bold and eloquent divine further adds in the same discourse : " To allow such a stream of human existence to be fed and renewed in every generation, which was pouring over the precipice at the rate of thirty millions a year, into such torments as the old method of representation c 34 NEW VIEW OF HELL. presented to us, and at the same time to teach that God was a loving Father — these two things have seemed so difficult to multitudes of persons, that they have fled from the attempt to reconcile them, and have abandoned all belief in them." And how does Mr. Beecher himself reconcile them ? Or how does he understand and interpret the language of the Bible which refers to the.future state of the wicked ? He frankly confesses his own blindness and confusion here. He don't know what to make of this language. " It goes to my heart to say these things," he says — i. e. the things he finds in the Bible. "Yet it is there, and if I am faithful to my whole duty I must preach it. As a surgeon does things that are most uncongenial to hira self, so sometimes do I. And I do this with tears and with sorrow. It makes me sick." It is plain, then, what was the old and universally re ceived doctrine among Christians concerning hell at the time Swedenborg wrote. Very few, however, believe this doctrine now. The light that has been flowing into all minds from out the new angelic heavens for the last hundred years, has so clearly revealed its hideousness, that you will hardly find an intelligent Christian of any denomination now-a-days, who does not reject it. Most people have no rational and clearly defined doctrine to take the place of the old ; but this latter nobody now accepts. The old doctrine, therefore, being such as we find it — THE OLD DOCTRINE. 35 SO irrational and monstrous and cruel in itself — so utterly repugnant to every true Christian feeling and to every just conception of the character and government of God — is it unreasonable to suppose that the Divine Being would some day vouchsafe a further revelation to his children on this subject ? If there ever was a subject on which the minds of men were in utter and impene trable darkness, and on which, therefore, a further reve lation was needed, is it not the very subject we are con sidering ? And at what time should we expect the reve lation to be raade, other than that when it seemed most necessary — the time of densest spiritual darkness, when such preposterous ideas as to the nature of hell and future punishment as those I have here presented, were gener ally taught and accepted for revealed truth ? III. THE NEW VIEW. WE have seen what the doctrine of hell was, which was generally taught and accepted by Christians a hundred years ago. It was a doctrine quite in agree ment with the sensuous appearances of truth in the letter of the Word ; and in agreement, therefore, with the gross conceptions of men in a carnal and sensuous state. It taught that hell was, literally, a lake of fire and brim stone ; — a place into which the wicked were to be finally cast, not out of mercy to them, or from any consideration of their comfort, improvement, or best welfare, but from a feeling of Divine wrath and vindictiveness. It was the generally a'ccepted belief when Swedenborg wrote, that this fiery lake was created for the express purpose of inflicting upon sinners the most excruciating tortures which Divine ingenuity could invent. Moreover, according to the doctrine of that period, the Supreme Judge of all the earth took a fiendish delight in casting his rebellious offspring into that fiery gulf, listening to their agonizing shrieks, and gazing on their ceaseless and indescribable sufferings ! And no incon siderable part of the joys of heaven, it was also believed 36 THE NEW DOCTRINE. 37 and taught, would spring from a clear view, given to those there, of the dreadful torments of the damned, and from a contemplation of the contrast between the miserable condition of these latter, and their own happy condition in the realms of bliss ! Such was the dreadful doctrine taught from most if not all of the pulpits in Christendom a hundred years ago ! — taught for the revealed truth of God ! — taught by the professed expounders of the Word of God ! — by the acknowledged teachers and guides of the people in mat ters pertaining to man's immortal life ! Yet intelligent people gravely ask. What need was there of any new or further revelation at the time Swedenborg lived and wrote? Considering how the Word of God was then misunderstood and falsified by its professed ex pounders — in what fearful darkness the minds of pro fessing Christians were then immersed, not only upon this subject but upon others also pertaining to religion, it would, indeed, have been strange if a new revelation had not then been made. Nor need we wonder, in view of this horrible doctrine concerning hell, which was commonly taught a hundred years ago for Bible truth (to say nothing of other doc trines equally revolting), that so raany in Christian lands should have lost all faith in the Bible as a Divine revela tion; and that many others who retain their faith, should have come to deny the existence of any hell whatever in the other world. Among the last and sure results of 38 NEW VIEW OF HELL. false teaching, are suspicions, doubts, denials, and finally the total eclipse of all faith. See how good men — ministers of the gospel even — who have not accepted the rational and heart-cheering truths of the New Dispensation, are troubled even in this our day by what they suppose the Bible to teach in regard to the future state of the wicked. Says the late Rev. Dr. Barnes, one of the raost distinguished of the Presbyterian ministers of our country: — " That any should suffer for ever, lingering on in hope less despair, and rolling amidst infinite torments without the possibility of alleviation and without end ; that since God can save men and will save a part. He has not pro posed to save all — these are real, not imaginary, difficul ties. . . . My whole soul pants for light and relief on these questions. But I get neither ; and in the distress and anguish of my own spirit, I confess that I see no light whatever. I see not one ray to disclose to me why sin came into the world ; why the earth is strewn with the dying and the dead ; and why man must suffer to all eternity. I have never seen a particle of light thrown on these subjects, that has given a moment's ease to my tortured mind. ... I confess, when I look on a world of sinners and sufferers — upon death-beds and grave yards — upon the world of woe filled with hosts to suffer for ever; when I see my friends, my family, my people, my fellow-citizens — when I look upon a whole race, all involved in this sin "and danger — and when I see the THE NEW DOCTRINE. 39 great mass of them wholly unconcerned, and when I feel that God only can save them, and yet He does not do so, I am struck dumb. It is all dark, dark, dark, to my soul, and I cannot disguise it." How many other good men are there among the Chris tian ministers of to-day, who, if they would but confess the honest truth, would tell you that they are in just the same darkness and distress that Dr. Barnes here confesses to — if not upon the same subjects, then upon some others no better understood. Yet Dr. Barnes himself, I pre sume, was so confirmed in all the dogmas of the Presby terian church, that the light of heaven as it beams out from the luminous pages of Swedenborg, would have seemed to him darkness as thick, perhaps, as that in which he confessed himself to be ; — it could hardly have seemed more dense. Verily, "the light shineth in dark ness, and the darkness comprehendeth it not." Certainly, then, a new. revelation concerning the nature of hell, or concerning the condition of the wicked in the great Hereafter, was greatly needed when Sweden borg wrote ; and therefore it was to be expected. Let us now examine the New doctrine on this subject, and see whether it is really worthy of the origin claimed for it ; or whether it be as irrational as the Old one which it comes professedly to displace. According to the new doctrine of the immortal life, the human soul is in the same form as the material body — that is, the human form. It is organized of spiritual 40 NEW VIEW OF HELL. substance, as the natural body is of material substance. It is the real individual — man, woman or child. It is that in us which thinks, remembers, reasons, loves. It is endowed with the senses of seeing, hearing, feeling, etc. — far more acute and perfect, too, than the bodily senses. It is not subject to decay or death, but lives on after the natural body dies. When that change which we call death (and which is the death of the body) takes place, the soul passes consciously into the spiritual world. It was there before death, but 2^«-consciously while its out look was into the realm of nature ; just as the body in a state of sleep is, unconsciously, in the natural world ; and when it awakes, it becomes fully conscious of its abode here. While the soul tabernacles in the flesh, its senses are ordinarily closed ; but when released from all connec tion with the body, its senses are all opened. It awakes to a consciousness of its existence in the spiritual world. It is then brought into open and sensible intercourse with the people and objects of that world. Its eyes and ears being opened, it sees and hears other spirits as plainly as we see and hear one another. And when the body dies, the character of every soul is, and continues to be, essentially the same as it was before death. And every one's character depends on the nature of his supreme or governing purpose— that is, on the character of his ruling love. If he were wise and righteous before death — if he took delight in serving THE NEW DOCTRINE. 41 and blessing others, he will be wise and righteous after, will find still greater delight in serving and blessing, and feel a more intense desire to serve and bless. But if he loved himself supremely — if his chief aim in life was to get gain for himself alone, to secure his own ease, com fort and advancement, and promote his own welfare, careless of the welfare and the rights of others, he will be in precisely the sarae state after death ; he will be just as indifferent to the wants, the woes, the welfare and the rights of others as he was before. If he had no genuine love of the Lord and the neighbor before, he will have none after. If meanness, dishonesty, lust, tyranny, hatred, contempt of others in comparison with himself, and selfish greed of gain, were in his heart be fore, he will be full of these same unclean and hateful vermin after. As it is written : " He that is unjust, will be unjust still ; and he that is filthy, will be filthy still ; and he that is righteous, will be righteous still ; and he that is holy, will be holy still." Heaven is within the soul ; so says the new doctrine. It is essentially a state of life, not a place ; — a state of supreme love to the Lord and the neighbor. It consists in the reception and exercise of the Lord's own unselfish love, which for ever seeks not its own, but the welfare and happiness of others. The happiness of heaven re sults from the exercise of unselfish love. This love is the angels' breath of life ; and the purer and more in tense it is, the more exalted is their bliss. 4» 42 NEW VIEW OF HELL. We see how well this agrees with the teaching of our Lord. For not only does He tell us that the sum of all which the Law and the Prophets teach, is comprehended in the two great commandments which require us to love the Lord supremely and our neighbor as ourselves, but He says also that "the kingdom of God is "within you." And the. kingdom of God is the same as the kingdom of heaven. Wherever love — pure, unselfish love — reigns, there the Lord reigns ; there his kingdom is established and his laws obeyed. And as the kingdom of heaven is within, so also (says the New doctrine) is the kingdom of hell. As heaven consists essentially in love to the Lord and the neigh bor, which is the love of doing good and serving, so hell consists essentially in the opposite kind of love — in the love of one's own self; and this love is real hatred of the neighbor. Hell, therefore, is a state of life the very opposite to that of heaven. It is a state in which the love of self -has absolute dominion in the heart. This love is the fountain of all other evil loves. It is the primal source of all infernal deeds. When it reigns supreme in the heart, there is no evil thing which a man will not do unless restrained by force, or by fear of loss, suffering or damage of sorae sort. Hence the Lord says : " For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, raurders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemy" — all the THE NEW DOCTRINE. 43 things which defile a raan, or render him spiritually un clean. We see, then, where hell is and what it is, according to the New doctrine. It is in the soul, and consists essen tially in the supreme love of self which prompts to all infernal deeds. To have hell in the soul, or to be in a state of supreme self-love, is to be in hell ; just as having heaven within, or loving the Lord supremely and the neighbor as one's self, is to be in heaven. Now all men are by natural inheritance more or less selfish. Naturally, therefore, we are all in the low state denoted by hell ; for we are dominated more or less abso lutely by the love of self. This is a low — a merely ani mal love ; and as our corporeal or animal life unfolds and matures, this love also unfolds and strengthens ; so that when we have attained to full maturity, it is usually the strongest — the ruling love. But this is not our true state. It is not the properly human state. It is not the orderly or blissful state for which we were created. It is not the state in which the Lord desires that we should reraain, because He desires that all should be happy. Therefore He is in the constant effort to lift us out of our carnal selfish state, and to make us unselfish and loving like Himself. For this end He assumed our natural humanity. For this end He has revealed the laws of our higher or heavenly life. For this end He has shown us very clearly the way to rise out of our natural state of self-love, which is hell, into that higher and 44 NFW VIEW OF HELL. nobler state — that state of sweet unselfish love, which is heaven. This great change (for it is, indeed, a great change), or this passing out of a low, natural, selfish state of life, into one that is higher, richer, nobler— in short, into the truly human state, is spoken of in the Bible as a "resur rection to newness of life;" as a "putting off of the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts," and a "putting on of the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness;" as " passing from death unto life ;" as being " born again " — " born from above " — " born of God," without which, we are assured, no one can enter the kingdom of heaven. "Except a man be born again, he cannot see the king dom of God." Now although the Lord desires that we should all pass out of our low or hellish state, into that high and heav enly one which He has made us capable of attaining, although He has told us how we may do so — has made the way very plain — has assumed our nature with all its hereditary and selfish proclivities that He might thereby become to us THE WAY — yet He uses no compulsion. He leaves all in freedom to either remain in their low natural state, which is hell, or to rise out of it into that exalted and unselfish state, which is heaven. He has raade known the conditions upon which alone we can rise ; and He is ever ready to lend us all needed help. He is continually calling to us and saying, This is the THE NEW DOCTRINE. 45 way ; walk ye in it. But He does not take hold of us like a policeman, and force us to walk in that way. No one can be forced to heaven ; for no one can be forced to shun evils as sins, nor to love ivhat is good and true for its o^wn sake. To go to heaven, we must freely comply with the conditions ; and the conditions are, that we voluntarily obey the laws of the heavenly life ; — that we struggle with and overcome our selfish and evil propen sities; — that we deny self, take up our cross, and follow the Lord in the regeneration. Such, briefly, is the New doctrine concerning hell — where it is, what it is, and how to escape it. Is there anything in it absurd and revolting, as we have seen that there is in the Old? Is there anything here against which enlightened reason utters its emphatic protest? — anything which impugns the wisdom or love of our Heavenly Father ? But how does this doctrine, it will be asked, accord with the teaching of Scripture ? It may be reasonable — - far more reasonable than the Old doctrine. But is it also Scriptural ? This is the question — and an important one it is, too — which next claims and will receive atten tion. IV. THE SCRIPTURE ARGUMENT.— SHEOL, HADES, GE- HENNA, AND THE LAKE OF FIRE. I HAVE said that while the Old doctrine of hell is sensuous, and in agreement with a sensuous philoso phy and a sensuous interpretation of Scripture, the New is eminently spiritual, and in harmony with the higher spiritual philosophy and with the spiritual interpretation of the Word. For the essential difference between the Old and the New doctrine, lies in this : That the Old represents hell as a place, created by the Lord at the time of man's creation, previous to his lapse into sin, and for the express purpose of tormenting sinners ; while the New declares it to be a certain internal state, wrought out in freedom through the voluntary infraction of the soul's own laws, or the laws of our higher life. Your child may reside in the ^.dcsxiQ place with yourself — beneath the shelter of the same roof, and surrounded by the same beautiful objects. But by a course of willful disobedience or unreasonable self-indulgence, that child may have destroyed its health, impaired its senses, and rendered itself miserable and wretched generally. And until its habits are changed 46 SHEOL, HADES, GEHENNA, ETC. 47 and its health renewed, it will find rest and comfort in no place however beautiful. Both hell and heaven, according to the New Theology, are within men. They are not places but states of life. But in the other world, these states project themselves outwardly, making all the surroundings of each spirit a perfect rairror, as it were, of himself; — reflecting with mathematical precision his own affections and thoughts. Heaven is a state the very opposite of hell ; as opposite as day is to night, light to darkness, health to sickness, love to hate, good to evil. The essential life of heaven, is the life of disinterested love — love to the Lord and the neighbor. The essential life of hell, is the life of self-love ; and this is real hatred of the neighbor. Heaven is a state in which the understanding is illu mined by the light of truth ; hell is a state in which it is obscured by the darkness of falsity. Heaven is a state of spiritual health, order, peace and joy unutterable; hell is a state of spiritual sickness, disorder, unrest and comparative sorrow. In the most exalted heavenly state, every one loves others even more than he loves himself; in hell, and in all hellish states, every one hates others in comparison with himself. Heaven is a state of hu mility, self-forgetfulness, and of sweet and serene trust in the Lord ; hell is a state of pride, self-seeking, and inward alienation from and opposition to the Lord. Heaven is a state of the most delightful freedom, in which every one finds his highest gratification in the 4S NEW VIEW OF HELL. performance of good uses from love to the Lord and his neighbor ; hell is a state of spiritual thraldom, in which no useful act is performed from love of or delight in the use, but only by compulsion, as a slave works under the lash. It should be said, however, that the love of self is evil and makes man an infernal only when it is the supreme and ruling love. Then it is out of its place and the soul is in disorder. In its right place, which is a state of subordination and coraplete subjection to the nobler love of heaven, it is good and useful. Says Sweden borg: " These three loves [the love of heaven, the love of the world, and the love of self] are related to each other like the three regions of the body, the highest of which is the head, the intermediate the chest and abdomen, while the legs and feet and soles of the feet form the third. When the love of heaven forms the head, the love of the world the chest and abdomen, and the love of self the feet with the soles of the feet, then man is in a perfect state according to creation, because the two lower loves then subserve the highest as the body and all its parts subserve the head." (^True Christian Relig ion, 403.) But when the love of self or of the world is as the head — is supreme — then the true order is reversed ; the man is turned, as it were, upside down ; the love of heaven is as tlf e feet, and he tramples on the laws of SHEOL, HADES, GEHENNA, ETC. 49 justice and neighborly love as often as his ruler (self- love) dictates. Such, according to Swedenborg is the essential nature of heaven and hell. They are both within the human soul, and consist in essentially opposite states of life — opposite kinds of love — resulting by inevitable sequence, in character, conduct, modes of government, and an outward or objective world, as different as are the loves that rule in these two kingdoms respectively. Surely there is nothing unreasonable in all this. But how does it agree with the teachings of Scripture ? That is the question for present consideration. And the first thing that claims attention, is the meaning of the word Hell. To ascertain this, we raust go to the original lan guages of the Bible. SHEOL and hades. The Hebrew word translated Hell, is Sheol. And Sheol, according to its primary literal import, means the under "world, or a vast subterranean place pervaded by thick darkness. Hence this word is sometimes translated the grave, as in Genesis xxxvii. 35 ; xiii. 38. The corre sponding Greek word is Hades. This has the same meaning as Sheol, and is always used instead of it in the Greek version of the Old Testaraent. And as further evidence of their identity of iraport, we find the passage from the sixteenth Psalm, "Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell" etc., quoted in the Acts of the apostles (ch.ii.). 5 D 50 NEW VIEW OF HELL. And in the Old Testament the Hebrew word for Hell in this passage is Sheol, and in the New it is Hades,— •proY- ing that these words have .one and the same meaning. Such being the plain literal import of the Hebrew She'ol, and its Greek equivalent Hades, some theologians have contended that our English word hell ought to be restricted in its meaning to the natural world ; for, according to the strictly literal import both of the Greek and Hebrew word, it means simply the grave, or a lo"w and dark place — a place underground ; and has no reference whatever to the condition of the wicked in the other world, or to anything beyond the natural realm. And if the Bible is to be literally interpreted — if it contains no raeaning beyond that which lies upon the surface, and which is obvious to the merely natural or sensuous mind, these theologians certainly have the best of the argument. What answer can the literalist consist ently give ? For how, according to his theory, is this word hell made to refer to the condition of the wicked in the other world ? Why should it not be restricted in its raeaning, to that which it literally denotes, viz., the grave, or a dark sicbterranean region ? Yet there are insuperable difficulties which those who contend for such a limitation of the meaning of this word, have to encounter. For, to be consistent in their hermeneutics, they should limit the meaning of the term heaven in precisely the same way. They should insist on restricting the meaning of this word also to the realm SHEOL, HADES, GEHENNA, E'TC. 51 of nature ; and should maintain that it has no reference to the condition of the righteous in the other world — for, in its obvious literal sense it has not. The word in the original Hebrew, translated heaven in our English version, is shdmayim ; and the literal signifi cation of this is, the firmament, or the space above the earth. It comes (so the best linguists tell us) from an obsolete root, shdmd, whose meaning in the cognate Arabic language is, to be high, or lifted up. And to this Arabic radical lexicographers refer the Hebrew terra as denoting an elevated locality — a high place. The Greek equivalent of this Hebrew word is ouranos, which is also translated by our English heaven, and means the sarae as shdmayim ; that is, the space above the earth, or the vast concave that surrounds the earth. And according to raost philologists it comes frora the Greek radical orao, which means to see — referring to the space above or around the earth, where by raeans of the sun's light objects are visible. We find, therefore, that the words heaven and hell, which occur so often in the sacred Volume, refer — in their plain, obvious, literal sense, as gathered from the Hebrew and Greek terms — to merely natural localities ; one, to a place that is high, or to a region above the earth, involving also the idea or possibility of clear- seeing ; the other, to a place that is low, or to a region beneath the earth, involving also the idea of darkness, or great difficulty in seeing. And if the literalists, or 52 NEW VIEW OF HELL. those who deny that the Scripture everywhere contains a spiritual sense, would be consistent, they should restrict the meaning of both these words to the natural world — and to things -without, not within the soul of man. For all good Biblical scholars know that neither heaven nor hell, according to the literal import of their equivalent Greek and Hebrew terras, conveys an idea of anything above the realm of nature. But there is abundant Scripture evidence that these terms are not to be thus restricted in their meaning. There is evidence that they refer to states and conditions of two widely different classes of people in the spiritual world. Thus the seer of Patmos tells us of persons and things that he saw in heaven, when he was "in the spirit," or when "a door was opened" to him in heaven. Surely the myriads of angels whom he beheld, were not seen with his natural eyes, nor in that region of natural space above our earth. No : John's spiritual eyes were opened, and this enabled him to see the beings and objects of the spiritual world. The Apostle Paul tells us that, on a certain occasion, he was "caught up to the third heaven," and heard there things which natural language cannot express. How "caught up"? Was the apostle's material body lifted through natural space into the upper regions of the air ? No one, I presume, believes this. No one sup poses that his corporeal part underwent any change of place. No doubt there was to the apostle the appearance SHEOL, HADES, GEHENNA, ETC. 53 of being suddenly lifted up; but this appearance was caused by, and was in perfect correspondence with, a change which took place at that tirae in the condition of the apostle's own mind. It was produced by a sudden opening of his spiritual senses even to the third degree.* No one ever was or ever can be carried to heaven — the heaven of which the Bible speaks — by being elevated bodily to the upper regions of space ; — no, not even if he were lifted higher than the stars. Then in the parable of Dives and Lazarus, we find the rich man represented as alive and in hell after the death and burial of his material body ; which proves conclu sively that the hell of which the Bible speaks, is not any region of natural space, but the state or condition of the wicked — and a state, too, in which they find themselves after the death of the body. How, then, are we to arrive at the true Scripture im- * According to Swedenborg, man is endowed with spiritual senses, which are ordinarily closed during his sojourn in the flesh. Yet these senses may be and sometimes are opened during his abode on earth; and when opened, he is intromitted into the spiritual world, and sees the objects and hears the sounds of that world as plainly as with his natural senses he sees and hears the objects and sounds of the natural world. And if the spiritual senses are opened to the third or inmost degree (for there are three degrees to the mind corresponding to the three angelic heavens) the individual is there by intromitted into the third or highest heaven. This, Swedenborg tells us, is the way in which he was admitted into heaven while on earth. And it was the way in which Paul vvas "caught up." 5* 54 NEW VIEW OF HELL. port of the terms heaven and hell? — for in their obvious literal sense, they are both used to designate natural localities — one a high and illumined, the other a low and dark place. According to what principle or law is their true meaning to be elicited ? Swedenborg answers this question, as no one else has ever answered it. (Let the reader, if he would appre ciate the full force of the answer, bear in mind that the Bible everywhere represents heaven and hell as opposite kingdoms — opposite as light and darkness, love and hate, truth and falsity, righteousness and sin, happiness and misery) — He tells us that the written Word is composed throughout upon the principle of correspondence ; that, between all natural and spiritual things, there is a cor respondence like that existing between the body and the soul; and that the Sacred Scripture, therefore, in each and all its parts, contains both a spiritual and a natural sense, which stand related like the spiritual and the nat ural worlds, or like the soul and body of man. The spiritual sense is as the soul ; the natural sense, as the body. As the body's life is from the indwelling soul or spirit, so the life of every part of the written Word is frora the spiritual sense. The body of man without the soul, has no life ; neither is there life in the letter of the Word when divorced from its inner spiritual meaning. It is by virtue of their spiritual sense that the Lord's words are spirit and life; for he says: "The words that I speak unto you, they are spirit and they are life." And SHEOL, HADES, GEHENNA, ETC. 55 the apostle also clearly recognizes the sarae truth when he says : " The letter kiileth; but the spirit giveth life." Agreeably to this doctrine of the Sacred Scripture, therefore, the words heaven and hell have each a natural sense such as I have already explained, and a spiritual sense with which the natural corresponds. Natural space corresponds to spiritual or raental state. Hence all words of Scripture, which in their natural sense refer to space, in their spiritual sense denote states of the mind. Accordingly there is natural elevation, and spiritual eleva tion ; elevation in space and elevation in state. And the term heaven, which in its natural sense refers to elevation in space, in its spiritual sense denotes elevation of state ; — that exalted condition of mind and heart, that state of clear perception of whatever is beautiful and true, and of disinterested love for all that is good and right, in which the angels are. So, too, there is natural lowmess, and spiritual lowness ; the former having reference to space, the latter to state. And the terra hell, which in its natural sense denotes a low place or a region under ground, in its spiritual sense denotes a low groveling state of raind ; — that state of carnal desire and selfish craving and obscure perception and blunted moral sensibility, in which the devils are. We often use the words high and low in their spiritual sense in familiar discourse ; and always when we have occasion to apply them to moral or human qualities, though in their primary literal signification they have 56 NEW VIEW OF HELL. reference only to natural space. We employ them to designate superiority and inferiority of character, or of mental and moral attributes. Thus we speak familiarly of a high order of intellect, of a high-vs\\rAtii man, of lofty souls, superior worth, exalted wisdom and love. We say of an individual that he stands high in the com munity, high in the church or in the state, that he is above others, etc., when our meaning is that he is spirit ually or mentally above them — superior in wisdom, skill, integrity, and moral worth. And equally often in famil iar discourse is the wOrd low used in a similar way. As when it is said of a mean and selfish man, that he is a person of a low mind, low desires, low motives, or that he is a low fellow. Indeed, the correspondence between the natural and spiritual iraport of these terras, is so obvious that it has never been lost sight of. Every one perceives it frora common influx. The Lord is called the Most High in Scripture, and is said to dwell on high, above the earth, and above the heavens. Surely it is not with any reference to natural locality that such things are predicated of the omnipresent One. No rational mind thinks of interpreting such lan guage literally ; for no one thinks of localizing the Divine Being. He is in all space — in the depths beneath as truly as in the heights above — yet is Himself without space. But on account of the infinite purity and excel lence of his character — because, in respect to the human attributes of love, wisdom and power. He is infinitely SHEOL, HADES, GEHENNA, ETC. 57 exalted above men and angels. He is said to be above all the earth, above the heavens, the Most High, etc. Yes : — The Scripture has everywhere a deeper meaning than that of the letter. It was given, not to teach us natural but spiritual truth. And it is by means of the law or rule of correspondence now revealed, that its true spiritual meaning is to be elicited. Space corresponds to state. And the words high and low, therefore, which in their natural sense refer to opposite regions of space, in their spiritual sense denote opposite mental states — ¦ opposite kinds of love. The Lord is spiritually the Most High. Therefore those who draw near to Him spirit ually, who become like Him in the spirit and temper of their minds, are spiritually exalted. And because all the angels are images and likenesses of Hiraself — because they resemble Him in their love, wisdom and works — because their affections, thoughts, motives, purposes are all pure, noble and elevated, therefore they are said to dwell on high ; or, what is equivalent, in heaven. And on the other hand those who are spiritually most remote frora the Lord, who are most unlike Hira in dis position and character, whose aims are altogether selfish, whose affections, thoughts, motives and actions are low and ignoble, and contrary to the nature of the Divine Love, and who are, therefore, in a state the very opposite to that of the angels, are said to dwell in a low place, betieath the earth ; or what is the same, ijt hell. I have said, moreover, that the Greek word translated 58 NEW VIEW OF HELL. heaven, involves the idea of light, being derived from a verb which signifies to see ; and that the original word translated hell, involves the idea of darkness, being composed of two words, which together mean impossible to see, or where one cannot see. Here, again, let that magic Key, the law of Correspondence, be applied ; and observe the result. Light and darkness, like all other objects, have a two fold signification — an outer and an inner, or a natural and a spiritual meaning. Light in its natural sense, is the light of the natural world, which affects our natural organs of vision. But spiritual light is of a different nature, though in perfect correspondence with the natural. It is the light of the spiritual world ; and although in its essence it is divine truth, it appears before the eyes of the angels as light. They see by means of it. This light proceeds from the Lord who is the Sun of the spiritual world — a Sun that appears to the angels immeasurably more brilliant than the sun of our world appears to us. It is the light of this spiritual Sun which illumines the minds of both angels and men. This is "the true light which lighteth every man that cometh into the world." And as natural darkness is the absence of natural light, so spiritual darkness is the absence of spiritual light. But there are two causes of natural darkness ; one is the absence of light, and the other is a diseased state of the organs of vision. The darkness from the first of these causes is seldom of long duration; and if the SHEOL, HADES, GEHENNA, ETC. 59 organs of vision are preserved in a healthy condition, we shall be able to see when the light coraes. But the darkness produced by the second cause is, indeed, de plorable. However brightly the light may shine, it is (if the eye-sight be gone) as if the sun were blotted out. The brightness of noon-day is as midnight darkness to us. So, likewise, there are two corresponding causes of spiritual darkness. One is, the absence of truth, or spiritual light. But this kind of darkness may soon be dispersed. For a person may be ignorant, and therefore in spiritual darkness ; yet he may preserve his mind in such an honest and healthy condition, that he will be able to understand and receive the truth so soon as it is presented to him. But there is another and far more deplorable kind of spiritual darkness. It is that which results from disobedience to the known laws of the heavenly life. It is the darkness into which those fall, who, under the influence of selfish and evil loves, confirm themselves in various false ideas contrary to the revealed Word of the Lord. For everywhere and always is it true, that "he who doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light lest his deeds should be reproved." Persons who, under the prompting influence of infernal loves, disregard and trample on the laws of their inner life, and so obscure their moral perceptions, come at last to hate the light of truth, and shun it as owls and bats shun the light of day. Their understanding becomes 6o NEW VIEW OF HELL. diseased ; their mental eye, adjusted to error. And how ever bright the truth raay shine, they do not see it. To them it appears as falsity. They " put darkness for light and light for darkness." Therefore the Lord says : "If thine eye be single [or raore correctly, sound, healthy'] thy whole body shall be full of light ; but if thine eye be evil [i. e., a;^-sound, diseased], thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If, therefore, the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness ! ' ' Matt. vi. 22, 23. Agreeably to this, Swedenborg often tells us that the denizens of heaven dwell in light inconceivably more brilliant than the light of this world ; while those in hell live in great darkness — for their understandings are darkened by innumerable falsities originating in evil lusts. Milton had a perception of this great truth when he sang : " He that hath light within his own clear breast, May sit in the centre and enjoy bright day; But he that hides a dark soul and foul thoughts, Benighted walks under the mid-day sun. Himself is his own dungeon." There is a great darkness within all evil spirits, and this produces the darkness without ; for in the other world everything without is but the reflection, under the great law of correspondence, of the state or quality of life within. But evil spirits do not appear to themselves to SHEOL, HADES, GEHENNA, ETC. 6l be in such darkness as they really are. Neither do evil men, whose understandings are darkened by falsities originating in evil loves. They even imagine themselves in clearer light than others. And so do the devils think they see far better than the angels. But their light is the light of fatuity — the dim (yet mercifully accommodated) light of perverted natures — which, compared with the light that shines in heaven, is as the light from ignited coals compared with the splendor of the noon-day sun. From what has been said, and from the correspond ence of light and darkness, we may see why the Divine Saviour — the embodiment and living manifestation of the Truth — calls himself "the light of the world " ; and why He says to those who had not previously known the truth, but had nevertheless kept themselves in a state to receive it, "They that sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, upon thera hath the light shined." We raay see also why it is said that " God is light, and in Him is no darkness at all"; and of the wicked, that "they walk in darkness," and will finally be "cast into the outer darkness where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth." All who do not, while here on earth, resist and over come their evil loves, find themselves in that "outer darkness ' ' when they enter the other world ; for through the indulgence of their evil lusts they shut out the light of God and the things of his wisdom frora their rainds. They are, therefore, excluded from the kingdom of 62 NEW VIEW OF HELL. heaven, having no heaven, and no love for the things which constitute heaven, in their hearts. Whatever truths they have ever known, they now reject and turn away from, because such truths condemn their evil loves. And so they immerse themselves altogether in falsities, for these are in agreement with their evils. Hence there are endless strifes and bickerings among them ; for each one fights for his own falsity, and calls it truth. And the jarring discord and angry disputes among those who are in falsities, joined also with mutual hatred, derision and contempt, are what the gnashing of teeth corresponds to, and what it, therefore, spiritually denotes. GEHENNA AND THE LAKE OF FIRE. But the Bible speaks of a fire in the great Hereafter — of the fire of hell, the everlasting fire, a furnace of fire; a lake burning with fire and brimstone, etc. And in this hell-fire, or lake of fire, it is said that the wicked will have their part. And the rich man in the parable is represented as saying, " I am tormented in this flame ; " — and this, after he had died and was buried. I presume few intelligent Christians now-a-days think of interpreting such language according to the strict sense of the letter — as it was interpreted a hundred years ago. They will tell you that this language is figurative, though none of them may be able to tell precisely what was meant to be conveyed by it. But Swedenborg, in his great doctrine of Correspondence, has furnished the SHEOL, HADES, GEHENiV.4, ETC. 63 true key to its meaning. He has given us the spiritual meaning of hell-fire, or the Gehenna of fire, and told us what it is in the human soul that fire corresponds to. But as the literal sense is the foundation of the spir itual, it is necessary always to give careful attention to this first. In the original Greek, Gehenna is the word translated hell, where the fire of hell, or the hell of fire, is spoken of And Gehenna is a Hebrew word transplanted into the Greek, with but little variation in its form. It is coraposed of two other Hebrew words, Gai or Ge, which means a valley, and Hinnom, the name of a man. The literal raeaning, therefore, of Gehenna is, the valley of Hiniiotn. This valley was south-east of, and near to, Jerusalem. The brook Kedron ran through it. Here the Jews at one time practiced the most impious idolatry. They had an iraage dedicated to Moloch, to which they offered in sacrifice not only bulls, lambs, rams, etc., but even their own children, who were placed in the arms of the image previously heated by a fire within, and thus were quickly destroyed. On this account the place subse quently came to be regarded with such abhorrence, that it was made the coramon receptacle of all the filth and rubbish of the city. The dead bodies of animals as well as of the most notorious criminals, were there thrown into one common heap. And a fire was kept continually burning to prevent the atmosphere from be coming pestilential — the worms, meanwhile, reveling in 64 NEW VIEW OF HELL. a luxurious repast upon the remains of the rubbish which the fire failed to consume. Here we have the primary, literal signification of the Gehenna of fire, which our translators have rendered hell- fire. It means the fire that burned in that loathsome valley of Hinnom. And as the last punishment and dis grace of condemned criminals was, to cast their dead bodies into that valley or that fire, the place came to be used as an appropriate symbol of the condition of those in the other world, who had violated, and persisted in violating, the laws of eternal love and justice revealed in the Divine Word. But what is the precise spiritual meaning of this hell- fire, or Gehenna of fire, as elicited by Swedenborg's grand Key — the rule of Correspondence? And we must never forget that the spiritual meaning of Scripture, if we can ascertain what that really is, is its true mean ing. For the Lord has himself declared that his words "are spirit and life." What, then, is the spiritual correspondent of fire? Swedenborg answers, "Love." Love, he says, is spirit ual fire or heat. Love is life ; and every man, therefore, has some kind of love, because he has life. To wholly deprive him of love, would be to extinguish the vital spark — yes, to annihilate hira. Love is the raotive power in whatever a man thinks, wills, says or does. As heat is the proximate cause of all activity, germina tion, expansion and growth in the natural world, so love SHEOL, HADES, GEHENNA, ETC. 65 is the cause of all activity, germination, expansion and growth in the moral or spiritual realm. Deprived of all love, a man would be like the earth deprived of all heat — unproductive and dead. While the more passionately he loves any object or being — it may be a woman, it may be wealth, it may be literary or scientific fame, it may be civil or military glory — the raore alive and active he is. See how the lower kinds of love — the purely selfish and worldly — the love of gold or glory, incite men to days of toil and nights of watchfulness ! And the higher and nobler kinds — loves purer and more angelic — are the springs of action in all men's higher and nobler achievements, in all deeds done to improve and bless mankind. Take away all love from human hearts, and what would raen do then ? And the less pas sionately one loves, the more sluggish he is in thought and action — the less is he alive. So obvious is it that love is the quickener and enlivener of the human soul, the very fire of every man's life. And the character of each one, therefore, or the quality of his life, is according to the nature of this fire. The correspondence between natural and spiritual fire, or natural and spiritual heat, is placed beyond a doubt when we reflect upon the fact that the body grows warm in proportion as any kind of love is enkindled or inten sified in the soul. The love may be impure and devil ish, such as those feel who are full of anger or revenge ; still it produces bodily heat ; the face reddens and the 6* E 66 NEW VIEW OF HELL. circulation is quickened. Again, the body grows cold as love departs, or as its activity ceases. All of which proves that there exists, between natural heat or fire and spiritual heat or love, a relation like that between cause and effect. And this kind of relation is what Sweden borg means by Correspondence. It is for the same reason, also, that the bodies of chil dren and young persons are usually warmer than those of the aged. They have more love in their hearts, or their love is more active ; and this quickens the circula tion of their blood. For a similar reason, again, we call persons whose hearts are full of love and sympathy, w«r»z-hearted ; and those who seem to have no love for anybody,