"I give tkefe J3 Mi . , /o7;thefou^iS^iiffudoll^gt^m0cfC''loa.y" " YAiLm-'^mwmi^mTTY'' Gift of 190H />v- ^ 7 7, ^l'-'7^7^C'<^^ '^ a DEDICATION TOWN HALL IN BROOKLINE. PROCEEDINGS DEDICATION TOWN HALL, BROOKLINE. Febeuaet 22, 1873. BKOOKLINE: PREPARED AND PRINTED BT AUTHORITY OP THE TOWN. MDCCCLXXIII. Ok ^1 « ^^^^o CONTENTS. PRELIMINARY PROCEEDINGS. Building Committee 7 Appointment of Committee of Arrangements 7 Proceedings of Committee of Arrangements 8 Music by Brookline Choral Club 9 Order of Exercises , 9 Appointment of President 10 Appointment of Marshals 10 CEREMONIES. Formation of Procession 11 Entrance into Hall 11 Invited Guests 11 President's Invitation to Prayer 12 Rev. Dr. Williara Lamson's Prayer 12 Mr. Aspinwall's Address of Welcome 13 Mr. Winthrop's Inaugural Address 17 Ode by Miss Harriet Woods 67 Presentation of Keys 57 Mr. Wellman's Address 58 Mr. Head's Address 60 Hymn 62 Benediction by Rev. Mr. Newton 63 SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS. Vote of Thanks to Mr. Winthrop 64 Appointment of Publishing Committee 64 PRELIMINARY PROCEEDINGS. Qn the twenty-second day of February, a. d. 1873, the building intended for the Town H^ll of Brookline was dedicated under the auspices of the Committee who had been charged with its erection, in presence of as many persons as could be crowded into its Upper Hall. The day was remarkably fine, though very cold. The arrangements were carefully made, and were carried out with such a degree of precision and punctuality as to satisfy both par ticipants and spectators. The history and description of the structure, from the appointment of the Building Committee to the day of its completion and dedication, are given in the lucid address of William A. Wellman, Esq., the Chairman of the Com mittee, which forms a part of this volume. The members of the Building Committee were — William A. Wellman. John C. Abbott. Augdstinb Shurtleff. Charles U. Cotting-'. William Lincoln. Chaeles W. Scuddek. William K. Melcheb. . William Aspinwall. Martin P. Kennard. The Building Committee invited the Board of Select men, consisting of Messrs. Charles D. Head, Horace James, William Aspinwall, James W. Edgerly, and Charles K. Kirby, to unite with them in making the arrangements for the dedication of the Town Hall to the purposes for which it had been erected ; and from these two bodies a Committee of Arrangements was formed, consisting of Messrs. William Aspinwall, Charles D. Head, William A. Wellman, Charles K. Kirby, and Martin P. Kennard. As the capacity of the Hall was only sufficient for a limited number, this Committee decided to issue tickets of admission to the dedicatory ceremonies, and to distribute them among the citizens of the town as impartially as pos sible, and to issue invitations to such distinguished persons as it was desirable to have present upon the occasion. Nearly two thousand tickets were issued, and thus distrib uted. About eighty invitations were issued : to the Gov ernor and other high executive and legislative officers of the Coramonwealth ; to the Judges of the Supreme Judi cial Court and of the Superior Court ; to the Judges and other civil, military, and naval officers holding commissions from the United States Government within the Common wealth ; to the Mayors of the neighboring cities ; to many of the Clergy of the vicinity ; to Ex- Senators of this Sena torial District ; to Ex-Representatives of the town ; and to the various town-officers, both present and past. The tickets issued were as follows : — BROOKLINE TOWN HALL. Saturday, February 22d, 1873, at 3 o'clock. ADMIT THE BEARER. 9 The invitation issued was in the following form : — THE INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF BROOKLINE Respectfully request the honor of your company at the DEDICATION OF THE TOWN HALL On Saturday, February 22d, 1873, at three o'clock p.m., on which occasion the principal address will be delivered by the Honorable Robert C. Winthrop. William Aspinwall, ^ Charles D. Head,' William A. Wellman, )> Charles K. Kirby, Martin P. Kennard, Committee of Arrangements. To An ansvirer will oblige. A ticket marked " Platform," in red ink, was enclosed with the above invitation. The music and singing on the occasion was given by the Brookline Choral Club, a voluntary association of ladies and gentlemen, who meet frequently to cultivate this delightful art. The Order of Exercises was as follows : — I. PRAYER. Rev. William Lamsoh, D.D. II. CHORUS, frora " Athalie." Brookline Choral Club. III. ADDRESS OF WELCOME. Hon. William Aspinwall. 2 10 IV. IXAUGirEAL ADDZ.Z.- 3.115. Erannnr i.7. Wr5TH3ija. T. ODE. Tl. E'^ilfr-irT of cae K*j5. Isw" WTrr»"w A. "WeolmjJ!^. Esq., C&aSrmEL tc ^nt B— -~-~.^ C ,i:ui\TT:r.^^^ to f ~>~'^- L*. Hku>, Za:;- C&ssasBB VHL BKSiLDlCTlO'S. Sett. WnjUAjt Whlkess'': Ein i"j:»-!r':y- The Conunittee of Anriraei:ie-t? apiH}iiLted therr Cbiir- mAn. HoiL WnxiAai A-?^-^w^--. Prerliez.: -;: ie E^iT; Eui he invited the folio wiz^- yttti^' gentlemeii to i.:t 15 !^lir^iils. to a.5si?t ra ?eetii.a' persons presentina tickets -oi -. " — .^^ — . and ther ac-cepted hi? invitation : — 'E'z.irzs'z W. BeT5n:>rT'7H. WisTHEOP ¦^. S-;r-DDEE. Geo2'^t K. Baoezs. AiiEiST W. Cobb. Fai^r::^ L. Weltjcas. Ts-Oju.- Aspiyw-A!.!.. Jb. .'.%^t- H. Hkusl -i:f7Ei. F. Tbjjs. fnrro V«ay Asxot. CffAKJLE.* E. Co-TYTSG-. AOilXI BL CeaJI^LSS. CEREMONIES. At three o'clock in the afternoon on Saturday the twenty- second day of February, a.d. 1873, the Building Commit tee and the Selectmen and other oificers of the town, with their invited guests, assembled in the north-west ante-room adjoining the Upper Hall ; and having formed a procession, headed by the President of the Day, Hon. William Aspin wall, with his Excellency William B. Washburn, Governor of the Commonwealth, entered the Hall, and took their seats upon the platform. The audience, who had been admitted by ticket, had already taken their places upon the floor. Among the guests upon the platform were his Excel lency William B. Washburn, Governor of the Common wealth ; Hon. Milo Hildreth, Hon. Seth Turner, Hon. Kufus S. Frost, and Hon. Edwin Chase, of the Council ; Hon. Charles Adams, Jr., Treasurer and Re eei ver- General ; Hon. John H. Clifford and Hon. Emory Washburn, Ex-Governors of the Commonwealth ; Hon. John Lowell, Judge of the United States District Court ; Hon. G. Washington Warren, President of the Bunker Hill Monument Association ; Hon. George S. Hillard, Hon. Marshall P. Wilder, Eevs. Wil liam Lamson, D.D., John S. Stone, D.D., formerly Rector of St. Paul's, Brookline, Samuel K. Lothrop, D.D., Chandler Robbins, D.D., George E. Ellis, D.D., Edwin B. Webb, D.D., Rollins H. Neale, D.D., PhiUips Brooks, D.D., Rev. William • ^2 Wilberforce N'ewton, Richard Frothingham, Esq., &c. The town-officers, present and past, former Senators from the 'District and former Representatives of the town, were also seated on the platform. When all the invited guests had taken their seats, the President rose and addressed the audience as follows : — It was always the custom of our fathers, and it has always been ours in Brookiine, to enter upon no great work without first seeking the aid and blessing of that Great Being without whose countenance and support the builder builds in vain. In humble observance ofthis pious custom, let us heartily join in the prayer which the Reverend Dr. Lamson is about to offer in our behalf to the Great Architect of the Universe. The Rev. William Lamson, D.D., pastor of the Brook line Baptist Church, then rose, and offered the following prayer : — PRAYER BT REV. WILLIAM LAMSON, D.D. Almighty God, our Heavenly Father, we come into thy presence to invoke thy blessing upon these services, upon those of us who are here assembled; for we ever recognize thee not only as our Creator, but as the God of Providence, and as the Father of Light, from whom cometh down every good and every perfect gift, and with whom there is no variableness nor shadow of turning. Help us to trace all our blessings, all our daily mer cies, all our sources of culture and of enjoyment, up to thee, the Infinite Giver. Gratefully would we acknowledge that the lines have fallen unto us in pleasant places, and that we have a goodly heritage. We would at this hour render to thee our thanks that the growth and prosperity of our town have enabled us to build this substantial, convenient, and beautiful edifice ; and that on this anniversary, so fraught with precious meraories, and so dear to the heart of every patriot, we are permitted to gather here, to set this building apart to the service for which it was designed. Smile upon us at this hour with thy favoring providence. Bless those who in the future, in coming generations it may be, shall gather within these walls. Grant that this building may long 13 stand an ornament to the town, and bless all the cheerful gather ings of our citjzens. Grant that its erection and its uses may contribute to our moral and intellectual culture, to our social en joyment, to our good fellowship. Our Father, we ask thy blessing upon the Commonwealth of which we are a part ; upon its Chief Magistrate ; upon its exec utive officers ; upon its legislators ; upon all who are in places of authority and of influence ; and upon the entire people. Let thy blessing rest upon our country, of which this Commonwealth is a part, and grant that it may continue for generations to come to be the home of civil, political, and religious liberty, to be the home of a Christian civilization. Our Father, accept these our thanks, and listen to these our petitions, which we present unto thee in the name of Jesus Chri.st our Redeemer. Amen. After this Prayer, the Brookline Choral Club sang the "Chorus" from Mendelssohn's "Athalie." This piece of music was very beautifully executed, and was received with rapturous applause by the audience. At its conclusion, Hon. William Aspinwall rose, and welcomed the invited guests and the assembled citizens, substantially in the fol lowing words : — mr. aspinwall's address of welcome. Fellow-Citizens op Brookline, Ladies and Gentlemen, — My colleagues upon the Committee of Arrangements have ap pointed me to act as President upon this interesting occasion, and in that capacity to welcome the guests who have been invited to witness the ceremonies of transferring this beautiful Hall, by the Committee who were charged with its erection, to the authorities of the town, who will have hereafter the duty of preserving it. No one can be more sensible than myself how unequal I am to this occasion ; and stifl I shafl perform the duty, however inade quately, with greater satisfaction than any I have ever discharged in this municipality, because it will associate my name more closely than ever with the history of the place I love better than all the world beside, — the ancient town of Brookline, — a town 14 which, though small in territory, and until recently containing but few inhabitants, can challenge comparison with any other town or city in this renowned Coramonwealth, for early and constant devotion to liberty, and for unselfish and unwavering patriotism. It is the cordial and respectful welcome of such a town, your Excellency, that I have the honor now to present to you. The overwhelming majority which, upon two occasions, its inhabi tants have given you, when presented to their suffrage for the high office you occupy and adorn, has sufficiently proved the esteem in which they hold your political character. But allow me to say, your Excellency, that it is not so much for your exalted station that they rejoice to see you here to-day, as because they know, as does the whole Commonwealth, that you reached that station by none of the arts too common among ambitious and self-seeking men, but by the simple force of a private life of unsullied integrity, and a public career unclouded by the shadow of suspicion. And to you, also. Gentlemen of the Council, the people of Brookline offer their warmest welcome, — to you, who, under our Constitution, share so largely in the anxieties and responsibilities of the supreme executive magistrate. Happy the Governor who has such good and wise advisers ! We had hoped to welcome upon this platforra sorae of the learned members of the Supreme Judicial Court and the Superior Court of this Commonwealth, who hold in their balances the life and liberty and property of every man in the State, from the highest to the lowest, from the Governor in his chair of office to the poorest laborer in the fields. But they have been unable to accept our urgent invitation, and we must content ourselves with sending them a message of greeting to assure them that they would have been most welcome here to-day amongst a people who regard them with the respect and admiration which their learning, their ability, their wisdom, and their perfect impartiality deserve and receive from afl who love virtue and revere justice. Our interest in their presence to-day amongst us would not have been lessened by the fact that we count among our most valued citizens two of the members of the most august tribuinal of the State.i 1 Honorable John WeUs and Honorable Seth Ames, associate justices of the Supreme .ludicial Court. 15 And to you also, gentlemen, servants of our National Govern ment, judicial, civil, military, and naval, the people of Brookflne offer their most kindly welcome. Having at afl times, and espe cially during the recent Rebeflion, stood by their country in afl its perfls, and having furnished their full proportion of men and treasure to keep the unity of the Nation unimpaired, they hail your presence here on this birthday of the great Father of their Country, as the visible evidence that that country has been preserved, and that the peace they strove for has been secured. And, finally, to you all, our invited guests, — whether you come from the counting-house or from the work-shop, from the bench or from the bar, from the pulpit or from the lecture-room, frora the shop or from the farm, — whether you serve more immediately the Nation or the Commonwealth, the County or the Citv or the Town, — to you all we proffer a true and hearty welcome, trusting that the honor you have done us by your presence will be amply repaid by the words of eloquence you are soon to hear. And now, my fellow;citizens of Brookline, who shafl grudge us a few moments of congratulation, even if it should savor of self-glorification ? Here is our beautiful Hall, so long hoped for, at length begun, and now corapleted ! By what steps this con summation so devoutly wished has been attained, it is for the worthy Chairman of our Committee to relate. But as his lips will never speak what I can tell you from ray own personal knowledge, I feel it is ray right, nay, my duty, to say, — with out arrogating to myself a tittle of the praise to which I think they are entitled, — never was a town better served by a Com raittee than you have been by those to whom you intrusted the building of this new Town Hall. That there should be lets and hinderances in the work was to be expected, for it was to be the work of many hands. But, with the exception of those human accidents, probably never was an enterprise from its beginning more fortunate, and in its end more successful. If it shall take from your treasury a little more money than you first appropri ated, you can console yourselves with the reflection, that, in the interval between your first appropriating vote and your last, you gained wealth enough to warrant the increased expenditure ; 16 since, in that space of time, the valuation of the property of this town from nineteen mfllions swelled to nearly thirty miflions of dollars. Welcome, then, feflow-citizens, to your own beautiful Hall, now soon to be used for afl its various purposes, — of business, of instruction, and of pleasure, for town meetings and caucuses, for lectures and concerts, and even for theatricals and balls ! Wel come within its walls, old and young, rich and poor, — all equal here ! Welcome, you who are native here and to the manner born, and you whom we sometimes invidiously call " new coraers," when you don't agree with us old settlers, though we are forced to confess that you now form the larger, if not the better, part of our inhabitants ! Welcome, all, — welcome ! But, feflow-citizens, I have almost forgotten that I am here little more than the master of ceremonies, whose part it is , to welcorae the guests and to present them to each other, and theh to retire ; and that there yet remains a raost iraportant part of this my duty unperformed. I have to introduce to our invited guests and to you, the principal speaker, the only orator, on this occasion, — a gentleman who, though not yet old, was presid ing over our House of Representatives thirty-five years ago, — who was first a member of Congress from Boston more than a generation since, — who was chosen Speaker of the National House of Representatives in the first half of the present century, — and who, during this long period of time, up to the present hour, has stood in the foreraost rank of American scholars, ora tors, statesmen, and practical philanthropists. Why need I narae him, since there is but one man in Mas sachusetts to whom this description can apply? Only, fellow- citizens, because he won his earlier farae as a citizen of Boston ; but we of this town, for some years past, have rejoiced in him as one of our own inhabitants, and we can boast to-day that we have the right to name him as RoBEKT C. Winthrop of Brookline. Upon this introduction, Hon. Robert C. Winthrop rose, and spoke as follows : — MR. WINTHROP'S INAUGURAL ADDRESS. Ladies and Gentlemen op Brookline ; Friends and Pellow-Citizens : I am deeply conscious how small a claim I have to the distin guished position which has been assigned rae on this occasion. I am, as you all know, but an eleventh-hour Brookline raan ; while around me are those who have borne the burden and heat of the day, not only in planning and preparing this beautiful Hall, but in building up the Town itself — of which henceforth, so long as it remains a Town, this stately edifice is to be the symbol and the seat of government — to its existing prosperity and importance. In yielding, however, to the kind and complimen tary request of your Selectmen and Building Comraittee, I had the satisfaction of reflecting, that, whatever I might find to say here to-day, in this Inaugural Address, I should at least be free from the temptation or imputation of commending any thing to whieh I had myself contributed, and should be enabled to pass an impartial and dispassionate judgment on the efforts and accom plishments of others. A residence in Brookline for six or seven years, which is afl I can claim to have enjoyed, has given me an opportunity for observation and inquiry in regard to the history and growth of the Town, and for acquainting myself somewhat with those who have lived here longer, and who have labored so diligently and devotedly for its iraprovement and welfare. To them, the honors of the occasion belong ; and if I shall succeed in doing justice to them and their predecessors, and in illustrating their services and successes, you will feel, I ara sure, that all the reasonable expectations of the hour have been fulfilled. We are here, on this auspicious Anniveirsary, — which, more than any other day, or all other days, in the calendar of merely 3 18 human nativities, is associated with whatever is brightest and best in the history of our country and of the world,— to take formal possession of a new and costly Town House, and espe cially to inaugurate and dedicate this spacious and magnificent Hall. But we do not forget that this is not the first time in our annals that such an occasion has been witnessed here. We do not forget that a similar ceremony has taken place even with in the memory of not a few of those who are assembled here to-day. Little more than a quarter of a century has elapsed, since the beloved and venerated Pastor of your first Parish was the chosen and appropriate organ of your Selectmen of that day, in welcoming the people of Brookline to what he then called, and what was then doubtless considered, " a coraraodious and beautiful," as well as a new. Town Hall. I need not say that it is still standing. You are but just relinquishing its occupa tion. It has been the scene of not a few interesting' delibera tions and memorable acts. Wise and weighty counsels have been heard within its walls. Stirring resolutions have been adopted, important measures have been concerted and consummated, by those assembled there. Above all, the sacred right of Freemen, the Elective Franchise, has, year after year, been exercised there. Precious memories of the living, and still more precious memo ries of the dead, cluster thickly within and around it ; and they will continue to be cherished by many of you, as long as it shall survive the changes and chances to which all earthly structures are subject. We shall do well, my friends, if we shall render this far more coraraodious and costly edifice as worthy of be ing held in honor by those who shall come after us. The past is secure. The future has always its contingencies and uncer tainties. Meantime, there are but few of the occasions which have been witnessed within those old wafls, which we should less wiflingly permit to fall into oblivion, or which some of you, I am sure, still hold in fonder or more vivid remembrance, than that Dedication Service on the 14th of October, 1845, when the exceUent Dr. Pierce recounted with so much fulness and fervor, and in so much of minute detail, the earfler and the later history of the Town. He was my father's friend and rny own friend. He was the friend of all, young or old, who had the privilege of his acquaintance, or who were in any way 19 brought within the magnetic power of his presence. A man of larger heart, of more genial temper, of kindlier impulses, was hardly to be found here or anywhere. His cheery tone still rings in the ears of all who ever heard it. His erect and stalwart frame was a fit setting for so active, eager, inquisitive a spirit. He made nothing, even to a late day of his life, of walking into Boston from the parsonage on Meeting House Hill, attending Thursday Lecture, or perhaps preaching it himself, at the old Chauncy Place Church, thence proceeding at once to the Monthly Meeting of the Historical Society, then dining with a former Presi dent of that Society,^ where I have so often met him, or with sorae other friend, and at last corapleting the circuit of no Sabbath day's journey by walking back to his Brookline home before sun set. And he could always tell you the precise number of rainutes, or even of seconds, which the walk either way or both ways had taken. This marvellous appetite for trivial details, however, went along with the keenest relish for historical and local research, or certainly for the results of such research. The history of the town in which he so long resided, and the history of the families and changing fortunes of his parishioners and neighbors and friends, were alraost as familiar to him as the Bible from which he took his weekly text, or as that grand old psalra which for so many years he lined and led, to the tune of St. Martin's, at our Annual Commencement dinner. He had passed the full terra of threescore years and ten when he delivered that Inaugural Dis course in 1845. Indeed, I have seen it carefully recorded in his own diary, that on that 14th of October he was " exactly 72 years and three months old." But he was stifl in coraplete pos session of afl his faculties. His raemory, and his power of era ploying its ample stores, were alike unimpaired ; and he gave free play to them on that occasion. How theu can I hope to glean anything for your entertainment or instruction from a field which he so vigorously and thoroughly reaped ? What can I say of the earlier or later history of your beloved town, down certainly to 1845, which he did not abundantly tell you, in an Address which is still extant, still remembered by some of you, and still within the ready reach of you all ? 'There is at least one, however, of his recorded experiences on that occasion, as ] have read it in his own account, from which I may take courage. i The late Hon. Thomas L. Winthrop. 20 After stating that he occupied an hour and a half in its dehvery, he adds : « I contrived to season my facts by many appropriate anecdotes ; so that I succeeded in keeping the audience awake throughout the Address." May I not venture to express the hope that, in this respect, if in iio other, I may be equally suc cessful ? In that Address, your late venerable Pastor did not fail, of course, to remind his hearers of the fact, which I may be par doned for recalling with more than common interest to-day, that the very earliest allusion to the place now known as Brookline is found, under date of August 30, 1632, in the Journal or History of Governor John Winthrop ; and that the very first authentic record of the place is that " Notice being given of ten Saga mores and many Indians, assembled at Muddy River, the Gov ernor sent Capt. Underhill with twenty musketeers to discover, &c. ; but at Roxbury they heard they were broke up." Let us pause for a few moments, and ponder this brief record, so as to unfold something of its real import and significance. A little more than two years had now elapsed since the Gover nor and Company of Massachusetts Bay had taken their birth rights on their backs, and their Bibles and their Charter in their hands, and had come over to found and establish an independent Colony on New England soil ; not yet, indeed, independent of the Crown or of the Parliament of Old England, — the tirae for that consummation was still in the distant future, — but a Colony wholly independent of control by London Committees or Com panies or Adventurers ; and which, in the bold transfer of its Charter, as was so well intimated by John Adams, foreshad owed, if it did not actually contemplate, the grander Indepen dence, of which he himself was " the Colossus on the floor of Congress," in 1776. Salem, where the Massachusetts Company landed in June, 1630, had already been planted by the worthy pioneer Governor, John Endicott, whom they had deputed to preside over what was called " London's Plantation," subject to their own regulations and instructions from time to time. But there was now no longer to be any " London's Plantation," or any even nominal subordi nation to any power, on the other side of the ocean, less exalted than that of Parliament and the Crown. They came in the spirit, and for the purpose of Self-government, to be exercised by 21 a Governor and Assistants, and soon by a Legislature, of their own choice and upon their own soil. And so they at once sought out a place for the seat of that government ; and after lingering a few months at Charlestown, where about a hundred of the planters who came over successively with Endicott and Higgin son had already settled themselves, they decided to cross the river and establish themselves at what the Indians called Shaw mut, and what some of the planters designated as Trimontaine, — from the three hills then prorainent upon its surface, — but which from the 17th day of September, 1630, was to bear the honored name of Boston. Less than two years had thus passed, since the birth, or cer tainly the baptism, of Boston, when the first- recognition or mention of the locality in which we are interested to-day was entered in his Journal by. Governor Winthrop. That record, I think, is fufl of iraplication and suggestion as to the condition of the site on which we are now assembled, as well as in regard to the immediate circumstances and surroundings of the Massachu setts Colony. Swarms of savages were still hovering around thera. " Ten Sagamores and many Indians," we are told, were assembled in this very neighborhood.^ A Sagamore is second only to a Sachem, or King of the tribe ; and the titles are some times employed indiscriminately. Ten Sagamores would thus im ply a large number of warriors under them. They were evidently understood to be lying in ambush ; the Governor's phrase being that our musketeers were despatched " to discover, &c." John Underhill was the most trusted Captain of that day, bearing very much the same relation to the Massachusetts Colony which Miles Standish bore to the earlier but wholly distinct and inde pendent Pilgrim Colony at Plyraouth. Twenty musketeers were sent with Capt. Underhill, — more than twice the number which Miles Standish took with him, when he was despatched on a similar expedition ten years before, and when he achieved his grandest victory, or what is called his " capital exploit." Every thing indicated danger, or certainly the strongest apprehension of danger; and before another week had elapsed, although this par ticular party of Indians had been " broke up " or dispersed, we find Governor Winthrop recording the gravest reasons for sus- 1 The site of one of their old forts is now occupied by the house of my friend William Amory, Esq., at Longwood. 22 pecting that a conspiracy existed among the Narragansett men and the Neipnett men, under pretence of quarrefling with each other, " to cut us off to get our victuals and other substance." And then the record proceeds : " Upon this there was a Camp pitched at Boston in the night, to exercise the Soldiers against need might be ; and Capt. Underhifl (to try how they would behave themselves) caused an alarm to be given upon the quar ters, which discovered the weakness of our people, who, like men amazed, knew not how to behave theraselves, so as the officers could not draw them into any order. All the rest of the planta tions took the alarm and answered ; but it caused rauch fear and distraction araong the coraraon sort, so as some which knew of it before [that is, which knew that it was a false alarm], yet through fear had forgotten, and believed the Indians had been upon us. We doubled our guards, and kegt watch day and night." ^ Such is the picture which Massachusetts and its principal town present to us, as we unfold the page which contains the earliest record of what is now called Brookline. There was plainly no settlement here at that day, or the Governor would have sent that little army of musketeers to assist and rescue the inhabitants, and not merely to discover and break up an ambush of the natives. And may we not well rejoice that it was so ? May we not well rejoice that there was no handful of scattered planters here to encounter the wild savagery of those " ten Sagamores and many Indians " ; and that Underhill and his twenty musketeers heard at Roxbury that they were already dispersed ? Yes, my friends, let us thank God to-day, that the narrative of our beautiful vil lage — I might rather say, of its pre-historic period — does not .open with a scene of raassacre. Let us thank God, that yonder River, " Muddy " as it was called, was not crimsoned and clotted with the gore of either white men or red men. Let us thank God, that our Brook was not destined to be called " Bloody Brook." T do not undervalue the gallantry and heroism of those upon whom the dire necessity has been laid, whether in earlier or later days, to wield the sword, and wage war to the death, against an Indian foe. Brookline, as we shall presently see, has exhibited her full share of such heroism. I fully recognize, too, that a' real and inexorable necessity has often existed, for suppressing, and punishing by force of arras, the lawless ferocity of the savage 1 Winthrop's History of New England, vol. i. p. 89. 23 tribes. The early Colonists must have abandoned their planta tions altogether, unless they were ready and resolved to defend them at afl hazards against the conspiracies and treacheries and mad assaults of the aboriginal race which surrounded them on every side. Even at this hour there may be Modocs or Apaches uncontrollable except by force. But we may afl still syrapathize with the sentiment, which was so exquisitely expressed by the pious John Robinson in Holland, when he heard of the first great victory of Miles Standish, in which six Indians had been slain, — " It would have been happy, if they had converted some, before they had killed any." We may all rejoice to remember, also, that within a few months only of the date of this record about the Indians at Muddy River, there arrived at Boston, and was immediately settled at Roxbury, where the first planters of this village so long went for their Sunday worship, a godly minister from England who made it his special mission, in the same spirit which had actuated those brave Jesuit-priests in Canada, to Christianize and civilize the natives ; and who, during the next thirty years, had not only preached to many of them, and taught many of them to pray, but had accomplisbed the more than Herculean labor of translating the wbole Bible into their, language. No more marvellous monument of literary work, in the service of either God or raan, can be found upon earth, than that Indian Bible of the noble John Eliot. Nor can any of us fail to admire and applaud the earnest and seeraingly successful efforts, for the introduction of a more humane and Christian policy towards the Indian Tribes stifl left in pur land, by the iUustrious Soldier who bas just been called again to tbe Executive Chair of the United States. There has been nothing more creditable to our Country, since, for a sirailar exhibition of humanity in the removal of the Cherokees beyond the Mississippi, William Ellery Channing paid that most eloquent and most enviable tribute to Winfield Scott.^ Pardon me, my friends, for such a digression. I may seem to have travelled a long way out of our little Brookline record ; but it has only been, after all, to explain and amplify the gratification I could not refrain from expressing, and wbich I ara sure you all feel with me, that those ten Sagamores and their followers were fairly dispersed before Underhill and his musketeers arrived here ; 1 Channing's Works, vol. v. p. 113. 24 and that the very first page of your records escaped, as it so narrowly did escape, from the stains of conflict and carnage. Let me hasten now to resume the more direct story of the Town, and to pursue it with greater rapidity. The venerable Pastor of your first Parish, when he occupied the position which you have done me the honor to assign me on this occasion, did not omit to inform, or remind, his audience, that under the repul sive name of Muddy River, or sometimes Muddy River Hamlet, the territory which Brookline now covers was for nearly three quarters of a century included within the liraits and jurisdiction of Boston. Perhaps, therefore, some of our friends who are so eager to return within the same limits and jurisdiction, may be found hereafter adopting the pohcy of the friends of Texas many years ago, who, when they had discovered some pretence for the idea that Texas had once been a part of the Louisiana Territory, hastened to prefix the little syllable re to annexation, and thought to strengthen their case by pereraptorily demanding the re-annex ation of Texas to the United States. I may be pardoned for. remembering, that a member of Congress at that day, from the neighboring City, who shall be nameless on this occasion, ven tured to suggest that these zealous and irrepressible advocates of Texas might be wiser, if they would exhibit as much of the suaviter in modo as of the fortiter in re. But jesting apart, and I have nothing serious to say in reference to any mooted question of local policy to-day, we are all well aware, as a matter of history, that for seventy-three years from the time when Boston first had a local habitation and a name on this side of the Atlantic, it embraced the territory now occupied by this Town. And its embrace, as we shall see, was a tight one, with a grasp not easily unloosed. It is thus from the old records of Boston, or of the Colony, that we derive almost all which is known of the village hamlet in which Brookline had its origin. I know not exactly at what date the first settler was found here, nor who he was. But as the General Court of the Colony ordered the construction of " a sufficient cartbridge " over Muddy River as early as August 16th, 1633, we may reasonably conjecture that transportation had commenced, and that the lands had theri begun to be cultivated and occupied. Yet the order seems to have been very slow of fulfilment ; since, on the 4th of March of the following year, we find the General Court passing a more 25 urgent and specific order, " That Mr. Richard Dummer and John Johnson shall build a sufficient cartbridge over Muddy River before the next General Court, and that Boston, Roxbury, Dorchester, Newtown, and ' Watertown shall equally contribute to it." This certainly looked like business ; yet it is as late as the 2d of June, 1640, that we find in the records of the Colonial author ities, that " The charge of Muddy River Bridge, being 151. 3.s. 6d., was ordered to be allowed as followeth : — By Boston, 61. ; by Roxbury, 51. ; Dorchester, 11. 7s. 8d. ; Watertown, 11. 7s. lid. ; Cambridge,^ 11. 7s. Ud." The building of a bridge across Muddy River in those days was probably accounted as great an under taking as the building of a railroad to the Pacific in these ; and I doubt not that the accounts of Richard Dummer and John Johnson, for fifteen pounds, three shillings and sixpence, were analyzed and audited more scrupulously and rigidly than any Erie, Pacific, or even Credit Mobilier accounts for millions of times as much. At the General Court, at Newtown, held by adjournment, on the 25th of September, 1634, we find a somewhat singular Order of two parts, in the following terms : — "It is Ordered, with the consent of Watertown, that the meadow on this side Watertown weir, containing about 30 acres, be the same more or less, and now used by the inhabitants of Newtown, shall belong to the said inhabitants of Newtown, to enjoy to them and their heirs forever, &c.' Also, it. is ordered, that the ground about Muddy River, belonging to Boston, and used by the inhabitants thereof, shall hereafter belong to Newtown, the wood and tiraber thereof, growing and to be growing, to be reserved to the inhabitants of Boston, provided, and it is the raeaning of the Court, that if Mr. Hooker and the congregation now settled here shall remove hence, that then the aforesaid meadow ground shall return to Water- town, and the ground at Muddy River to Boston." Such legis lation seems to partake too much of the quality which gave the name to our River to be easily made clear. But as the eminent Thomas Hooker with his congregation did soon afterwards (1636) remove to Springfield, and thence to Connecticut, all orders conditional on his staying in this vicinity may fairly be dismissed as null and void. 1 Newtown had become Cambridge at this time ; the name having been changed in 1638. 4 26 Turning now to the Boston Records, we find that in 1685, at a general meeting of the inhabitants, on the 14th of December, " it was agreed, that Mr. WiUiam Colbourne, Mr. William Aspin waU, and three others, shafl lay out at Muddy River a sufficient allotment for our Teacher, Mr. John Cotton." This was the celebrated Clergyman who had come over from old Boston to new Boston, and whose historical fame is enough for the glory of both cities. Though I befleve he never flved here himself, this allotment was doubtless the origin of the estates which some of his family enjoyed here soon afterwards. At the same meeting of the people of Boston, it was agreed, " that the poorer sort of inhabitants, such as are members, or likely to be, [probably meaning members of the Church] and have no cattle, shall have their proportion of allotments for planting ground and other, assigned unto them by the aUotters, and laid out at Muddy River by the aforenamed five persons, — those that fall between the foot of the hill and the water, to have but four acres upon a head, and those that are farther off, to have five acres per head." Four years later stiU, in 1639, it was agreed, " that five hundred acres be laid out at Muddy River, for perpetual Commonage to the inhabitants there and the Town of Boston, before any other allotments are made." If this perpetual Commonage, ten times larger than what we now know as Boston Coraraon, had been indeed perpetual, Boston would not now have been in need of seeking' land for a public Park. But the small allotment system soon most happily prevailed over any such extensive arrangement for Commonage, and the land was quickly dotted over with those little independent freeholds, which have been, and ever will be, the best foundations and the strongest bulwarks of freedom and self-government. No dependent tenantry could have ever made Massachusetts what she is. Nothing but independent freeholds can keep her what she is. Public Parks are grand things for the amusement, recreation, and health of the whole people. Great landed estates are the natural support of an aristocracy. The division of lands is as essential to liberty, as the division of labor to prosperous busi ness and the advanceraent of industry and the arts. But soraething more than independent freeholds was required, and ever wiU be required, for the security of freedom and for the 27 wise exercise of self-government. I need hardly say that I mean Education ; and not until 1686-7 do we find any specific local provision here for that all-important object. It was on the 8th of December, old style, of that year, the 18th of December, new style, — a little more than one hundred and eighty-five years ago, — that the government of the Colony, then under the temporary Presidency of Joseph Dudley, in answer to a Petition from Muddy River, passed the following raeraorable Order : " Ordered, that henceforth the said Hamlet of Muddy River be free from town-rates to the Town of Boston ; they maintaining their own highways and poor, and other public charges, amongst them selves ; and that within one year they raise a School House, and also maintain an able reading and writing Master; and that the inhabitants annually meet to choose three men to manage their affairs." The acceptance of that Order, at a full meeting of the inhabi tants, precisely a week after it had passed the Colonial Council, with the vote for the maintenance of the School Master, is the first formal entry in the Town Clerk's records of Brookline ; and certainly no worthier or more welcome beginning couid have been desired or devised for your recorded history. That history, indeed, is stiU the history of a haralet, appurtenant to Boston, But the freedom from Boston rates, with the liberty " to chpose three men to raanage their affairs," was a great step towards independence, and rnade the haralet a town iu alraost every thing except the name. The little triumvirate which first administered the powers thus granted to IVfuddy River, must not fail to be remembered on such an occasion as this : — They were Ensign Andrew Gardner, John White, Jr., and Thomas Sted^ man. This virtual independence, however, seems to have been of brief duration. No sooner had the tyrannical And/os and his government been overthrown, as they so richly deserved to be, than Boston, in March, 1690, disannuUed this arrangement, and voted "that Muddy Biver inhabitants are not discharged from Boston to be a haralet by themselves, but stand related to Boston as they did before the year 1686." Ten or eleven years raore of quiet subraission rolled on, when the inhabitants of this place were eraboldened hy the increase of their numbers and of their wealth, to request the consent of Boston to their becoming a separate Town ; and curiously enough, in view of the facility of 28 modern locomotion, one of the reasons assigned was the remote ness of their situation! But Boston resisted and resented the petition, and voted that though the inhabitants of Muddy River " had not for some years been rated in the Town rate ; yet, for the time to come, the Selectmen should rate thera in the Town tax as the other inhabitants, and as they used to be." A question of Taxes was thus evidently at the bottom of the controversy with Boston for separation and independence. And questions of taxation seem to have been at the bottom of almost all political controversies, small and great, in our own land and in other lands, from the days of Ship money down at least to the days of the Tea tax. There seems to be in huraan nature every where an inherent aversion for Tax-layers and Tax-gatherers. I recall at this moment only one notable instance of any thing like voluntary submission to taxation. There may be others in Dutch History or elsewhere. But for this I turn back to the pages of Holy Writ ; and even this may have meant something more or less than meets the ear. You all remember the Gospel account of what happened at the time of the first advent of our Saviour, in which it is recorded that " all went to be taxed, every one into his own city." It is a charming narrative, hal lowed in all our hearts at once by the sacred volume in which it is contained, and by the exquisite story of which it is the preamble. But I fear that we must wait for the second coming of our blessed Lord before such a record, in its literal inter pretation, will be found again anywhere. The tendency of later days, certainly, in some parts of the world, not a thousand miles off, has been to flee from one's own City, or one's own Town, to escape taxation! It has been partly the result of extrav agant and wanton expenditures by those in authority, and partly of capricious and unjust appraisements of individual estates. But a fair' and equal proportion of our property is a debt due to the governraent, and to a governmerit of our own choice ; and debts to the government, whether of the Nation, the State, the City, or the Town, are nothing less or other than debts, and ought to be so recognized and so discharged. Every man knows what he owes, and where he owes it ; and it is not only a wrong upon the public treasuries, but a wrong upon our neighbors, throwing upon them the burden of unequal contributions, to run away and leave our part unpaid. I have sometimes thought that in the common case of double residence, if I may so call 29 it, a provision of Law might be made that a person should be rated in both places, and one-half of each Tax bill be paid in each place. But the only radical cure must be found in correcting the abuses of our municipal governments, large or smaU, and in quickening the consciences and the sense of duty of the tax- paying community. Boston, it seems, desired and determined to hold our little hamlet still amenable to her own assessors ; and nothing reraained for the inhabitants here except an appeal to the Colonial Legisla ture. Such an appeal was made without success in 1704, Boston still making strenuous opposition to it. But a new Petition, signed by thirty-two Freeholders, headed by Samuel SewaU, Jr., and which seemed to iraply in its terms that the objections of Boston had at length in sorae way been overcome, was presented during the following year ; and on the 13th day of November, 1705, the Act of the 4th year of the reign ofi Queen Anne, as it carefully sets forth, was passed and signed by Governor Joseph Dudley, creating the inhabitants of Muddy River a Town by the name of Brookline. The Act was a brief one, but therCiWas at least one remark able provision in it, by which the inhabitants were " enjoined to build a Meeting House, and obtain an able Orthodox Minister, according to the direction of the Law, to be settled within the space of three years next coming." Religious education was a part of the systera by which Massachusetts was built up ; and though we have wisely abandoned all attempts at prescribing what is, and what is not, Orthodox, and have adopted the vol untary principle in regard to places for public worship, we shall do well to bear in mind that no raere secular instruction, how ever complete and thorough, was regarded as sufficient for sus taining free institutions by those who founded them. This condition of the Brookline charter, however, was not fulfiUed, it seems, until nearly three times " three years " had expired. It was not until the year 1714 that a Meeting House was erected . here. Before that time, the settlers here, we learn, had united in worship with the First Church in Roxbury ; and good Dr. Pierce has given us an amusing anecdote of a lady of this place, of the olden time, " rising up early on every Lord's Day morning, adjust ing her head-dress over a pail of water, for want of a looking- glass, and then walking five miles to Roxbury meeting " ! I know 30 not whether another record of such a mirror can be found since Narcissus admired himself in a fountain and was metamorphosed into a flower. No wonder, that in view of the necessity of a walk, or even a drive, to Roxbury, in order to find a place for public wor ship, the people here made such exhausting efforts to provide a place for themselves, as it would seem from your Records they did. In those days, it will be borne in mind, every Town was caUed upon not only to send a Representative to the General Court, but to pay his expenses and charges forgoing, staying, and returning. But on the Mth of May, 1714, — the year the first church here was erected, — we find a vote of the Inhabitants deliberately declining to send a Representative " upon account of their building a Meeting House, and the great charges thereof for such a poor little town," and desiring and praying the Honor able House of Representatives to excuse them for that year. It may help us to illustrate the period when Brookline first became a Town, and to fix it in our memory, if we bear in mind that the first Newspaper in British North America had been pub lished the very year before^ and that a very remarkable child was born in the early part of the very year after. The Newspaper was a weekly print, on half a sheet of pot paper, in smafl pica, and it was called the Boston News Letter. The child was a strong, vigorous boy, christened on the day of his birth in the Old South Church, and giving the earliest promise of the won derful career he was to run ; and his name was Benjamin Frank hn. The great printer foUowed hard after the first Newspaper ; and the Boston, of which Brookline was just ceasing to be a part, was the birthplace of thera both. And thus, my friends, seventy-three years after those " Ten Sagaraores and many Indians " had been lying in ambush at Muddy River, BrookUne at last stands before us, with at least thirty-two freeholders, with aU the privfleges, and in afl the dignity, of a Town. The Petition itself, singularly enough, asked only to be " a separate viUage, or peculiar;" and this designation is twice repeated by the Petitioners. " A Peculiar " was an old Enghsh ecclesiastica] terra, which stood for a Parish exempt from the jurisdiction of the Ordinary of the Diocese, and subject only to the MetropoUtan. But there was another signification, for which 31 Dr. Worcester has given us the authority of John Milton's glo rious prose, — " One's own property." This, doubtless, was the sense in which it was used in the Petition. Brookline was hence forth to be "its own property," and to do its own rating and taxing. We may well be satisfied, however, that the Colonial Council declined to take the Petitioners at their word, and saved them frora being laughed at, as they would have been if the inhab itants of Muddy River had been incorporated as " a Peculiar." But there is aijother peculiarity about the Petition. Its thirty- two signers had but just half that nuraber of separate surnames araong them all. There were five of the name of Gardner, and five of the name of Winchester ; three of the name of White, three of Stedraan, and three of Ackers; two of the narae of Aspinwall, and two of Devotion ; and one each of Sewall, Boyl ston, Sharp, Ellis, Woodward, Holland, Shepard, Chamberlain, and Seaver. These were the old family naraes of the place. There raay have been others, and doubtless were. There may have been differences of opinion about making Brookline a Town or a Peculiar in that day, as there certainly are about unmaking it at this day ; or other considerations or circumstances may have prevented some of the inhabitants from signing the Petition. But those sixteen names of those thirty -two Freeholders raust ever be associated with your first existence as a Town. Sorae of them are already inscribed upon your highways, as the names of streets or avenues. Many more of them might well be inscribed there. I know not why we should go out of our own local history to find names for our thoroughfares. I even doubt whether it is worth while to go into the woods and forests for such a purpose, when we have at hand the names of men who cut down the woods and cleared the forests for us. Walnut and Chestnut and Cypress are sonorous and significant titles, more especially if stately rows of shade trees are set out along the roadside in cor respondence with the names. But Aspinwall, and Boylston, and SewaU, and Winchester, which you have, and Gardner, and Sharp, and Stedman, which I befleve you have not, would sound as weU and signify more. It is not enough to write our local history on perishable records. It should be written where he who runs raay read it. I have often lamented, with others, that so few of the names of the Founders of my native City were inscribed on its principal streets. The new parts of the City 32 seemed to afford the very opportunity for repairing such an omis sion. The musical titles of the English Peerage, however, — Arlington, Berkeley, Clarendon, and the rest, — have been al lowed to prevail over the honest patronymics of our own settlers and citizens. But henceforth, as long as we are a Peculiar or a Town, I trust that the naraes of our Brookline streets, and school- houses, too, raay be taken frora her own earlier or later history. Not a few of the names signed to that Petition were eminently worthy of such a commemoration, if of no other. Samuel Sewall, Jr., was not only himself the first signer of the Petition and the Town Clerk who attested the act of incorporation, but his father was one of the largest early landholders of the plaee ; a member of the Colonial Council at the time; one of the Colo nial Judges from 1692 to 1728, and Chief Justice for the last ten .of those six and thirty years. It is true, and " pity 'tis 'tis true," that sharing in the delusion which so widely prevailed through out the Massachusetts Colony during the first year of his long judicial career, he concurred in the condemnation of those con victed of Witchcraft. But so had Sir Matthew Hale, one of the purest and wisest of Old England's Judges, — little more than a quarter of a century before. Sewall, too, five years after wards, made a frank and raanly confession of his grievous mis take, imploring publicly " the pardon of man and God for his guilt." Who will not say Araen ! to the noble lines of our Charm ing Quaker Poet — " Green forever the memory be Of the Judge of the old Theocracy, Whom even his errors glorified. Like a far-seen, sunlit mountain side By the cloudy shadows, which o'er it glide " ! Whittier did not forget, and none of us would be wiUing to forget, that SewaU's Tract, entitled " The SeUing of Joseph," — a copy of which, found among my own family papers, was recently reprinted in the Proceedings of the Massachusetts His torical Society, — was among the earliest public protests against Doraestic Slavery, then tolerated at the North as wefl as at the South. He was a man of eminent benevolence and beneficence, of large, hospitality and comprehensive charity. His wife was a daughter of John Hull, another of the earliest landholders here, the original Mint-master of the Massachusetts Colony, to whom 33 has been ascribed the device of an Indian with his bow and arrow on our State Shield,^ and who was the unquestioned coiner of those faraous Pine Tree Shiflings, bearing the date of 1652, which gave such urabrage to King Charles the Second, ¦¦ — who was only appeased, it is said, by the suggestion of Sir Thomas Tem ple, or somebody else, that the Tree intended to be designated was the Royal Oak which saved His Royal Majesty. The wife of John Hull was Judith Quincy, daughter of Edmund Quincy,^ the founder of that distinguished family in New England, whose blood, of course, our first signer inherited. Can any thing more be needed to make the name of Sewall a household raeraory in Brookline ? It has been said that the Judge stood godfather to the Town, and gave it its narae from the little brook which ran through his own meadows. If he did, the engrossing clerks of the Colony and the Town failed to adopt his speUing of the narae. On turning to his own raanuscript Diary, not raany days ago, I found the following emphatic entry, under date of Novem ber 12, 1705: — =' Brooklyn is pass'd to be a Township p the Council"; while more than a year earlier, under date of 1 April, 1704, he writes, " visited ray valetudinarious son at Brooklin." ^ The final e is needed to bring these discrepancies from the Town name, as it is properly written and pronounced, within the recon ciling principle of what the lawyers call the " idem sonans." The narae of Gardner stood second on that successful Peti tion, and five of that name were among its signers, — Thomas, Joseph, Thomas, Jr., Caleb, and one whose Christian name has been worn off in the lapse of years. Perhaps it was Andrew ; for Andrew Gardner, you remember, was at the head of the little triumvirate selected to manage the local aftairs of the village nine or ten years before. Thomas Gardner was himself the first Deacon of the first Church in Brookline. His grandson, Isaac, a graduate of Harvard in 1747, and afterwards a leading raan of the Town, respected and beloved by all, was among those who went out frora Brookflne on the 19th of Aprfl, 1775, and was killed at Cambridge by the British troops on their retreat to 1 More probably, he was only the engraver of it. 2 The marriage ceremony was performed by Governor Winthrop " on the 11«' of the 3? month," 1647. « The Diary repeats the latter spelling in the following record, dated July llth, 1704 : " Son and Daughter Hirst, Joseph and Mary, rode with me iu the Coach to Brooklin, and there dined at my sou's with the Governour, his lady, Mr. Paul Dudley and wife," and other grand company. " Sung a Psalm.'' 5 34 Boston; whfle, on the following 17th of June, Col. Thomas Gardner of the same stock, though then hving over the Brighton border, feU nobly at Bunker Hill. Could any worthier name be recaUed on this occasion, more especially since it is henceforth to be associated, not only with those heroes of the past, but with a recent munificent donation to your Pubhc Library by one of your living fellow-citizens of the same name?^ The name of White stands third on the Petition. It has been found before on the list of those first three Selectmen, and is to be found again in connection with a liberal gift of Woodland for the maintenance of the Brookline minister. Thomas Stedman, the third of those three Selectmen, is the fourth signer of the Petition; and the fifth is John Winchester, Brookline's first representative to the Gerieral Court, in 1709. And now we have a name as eminent for its worth, as it is first in alphabetical order. The sixth and seventh signers were Samuel and Eleazer AspinwaU. Capt. Samuel AspinwaU was born here in 1657 ; and, from that year to this, whether as hamlet, village, peculiar or town, Brookline has never been without a distinguished bearer of his name and blood. The old house built by his father before 1666 is still standing, or at least trying to stand. Of the venerable elm which overshadowed it certainly for more than a hundred and fifty years, — if, indeed, it were not coeval with Columbus, — nothing reraains but the antique roots, and a few feet of massive but mutilated trunk. They are almost the last relics of the old Muddy River Hamlet, and I wish they could be enclosed and inscribed as a monument of the remote past. What an inspiring stump that would be for an open-air speech on some historical anniversary I If nothing else can be done, I trust that enough of it may be secured as a desk for this very platform. If it were here at this moment, my manuscript would have a most congenial resting-place, — more precious than the most skilful carving or veneering of Oak, or Maple, or Satin- wood. But the old family tree is stiU fresh and vigorous, and has literally borne leaves for the heahng of the people. No name of his period — in Brookflne history, certainly — has been more honored, or more worthy of being honored — not always, alas, the same thing — than that of the late Dr. WUliam Aspinwall, * On the 6th of January, 1871, the sum of Ten Thousand dollars was presented to the PubUc Library of Brookline by John L. Gardner, Esq. 35 so long an eminent physician of the Town, and who, while devoted to the duties of his profession and to the interests of his native place, found time to serve the State with distinction as a member successively of both branches of the Legislature and of the Executive Council. You all know, too, how respected and beloved was his son, the late Augustus Aspinwall. But what may I say of another son still hving ; who, until a few weeks past, exhibited so little of old age except its experience, its wis dora and its venerableness, that no one was ready to give credit to the tale which he sometimes told of a birthday in Brookline eighty-six or eighty-seven years ago ; with that empty sleeve which he has carried for nearly sixty of those years, as a badge of noble daring while a leader in the Army of the United States, in that war with England which we trust will never lose its designation as " the last war " ; but who, with the arm which was left hira, has done as much of faithful service to his Country and his Country's history, at horae and abroad, as any boasted Briareus of ancient or of raodern fable.^ He is not with us here to-day, as he so recently promised to be ; but all our hearts are with him in his chamber of sickness ; and every one of you will eagerly unite with me in the hope, that he may still be spared to enjoy the respect and affection of all who know him ! The name of Aspinwall is followed by that of William Sharp, the only representative of that name on the Petition ; but his father, or it may have been his grandfather, John Sharp, had come here with the earliest Aspinwall, while two of his family, both of them Robert Sharp, father and son, had already fallen bravely in battle whOe fighting against the Indians. The father fell in King Philip's War, on the 18th of April, 1676 ; and in the grave yard at Sudbury, not far frora the Wayside Inn, which Longfel low and Parsons have both so charraingly illustrated, raay be read the following '' inscription : "Capt. Samuel Wadsworth of Milton, his Lieut. Sharp of Brookline, and twenty-six other souldiers, fighting for the defence of their Country, were slain by the Indian enemy, and lye buried in this place." And if any additional claim could be needed for a grateful reraerabrance of the name on this occasion, it would be abundantly found in the fact, that frora the daughter of John Sharp were descended those 1 Col. Thomas Aspinwall, for nearly forty years United States Consul at London, who, within the last three years, has edited and annotated two volumes of valuable Papers for the CoUections of the Massachusetts Historical Society. 36 admirable and brilliant Buckminsters, the revered pastor of Ports mouth and his eloquent son of Brattle Street, of whose Me moirs it was long ago said by Thomas Carlyle, the Historian, that " it gave a much better account of the higher sort of char acter in New England than any thing he had seen since Frank hn's writings." I can follow this list of honored names but little farther. Yet I must not omit the very next one ; that of Edward Devotion,^ from whose estate the Town ultimately received no less than 739 pounds and 4 shUlings, lawful money, for the use and mainte nance of its schools ; as large a sum nominally as John Harvard left to the CoUege at Cambridge in 1638. A century and a quar ter had, indeed, made a wide difference in the actual value of the gifts ; but if Harvard's name has been given to a whole Univer sity, the narae of Devotion is certainly worthy of being inscribed on one of your Town Schools. One other name, standing near the foot of the list, but the associations with which are by no means of inferior interest, must close my aUusions to these memorable signers of that httle dec laration, or petition, for independence. I need hardly say that I refer to that of Peter Boylston. A spirit of independence might alraost seem to have been transmitted with his blood, for his daughter was the mother of brave old John Adams. Himself the son of the earliest physician of Muddy River, he was, also, the brother of that celebrated physician and surgeon, Dr. Zabdiel Boylston, who during the prevalence, in 1721, of that terrible scourge of which we have recently had so many unwelcome reminders, is recorded, on yonder tombstone, to have " first intro duced inoculation into America " ; and who persisted heroically in the practice, beginning with his own son, in spite of the men aces and positive assaults of a prejudiced and exasperated popu lace. He is said to have been " execrated and persecuted as a murderer " ; " his house [in Boston] to have been attacked with violence"; he himself to have been shut up at one time for a fortnight in a secret apartment, whfle " the enraged inhabitants were patroUing the streets with halters, threatening to hang him on the next tree." Yet inoculation was justly regarded, no long time afterwards, as great a discovery and as valuable a prevent ive, as vaccination is at this day. It had beeri for the first time 1 I learn, from my friend WilUam I. Bowditch, Esq., tUat the old house of Ed ward Devotion is stiU standing. 37 performed in the English dominions, we are told, only seven or eight weeks before, on a daughter of the celebrated Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, who had witnessed. the operation in Turkey, during her residence in Constantinople, where her husband was the British Ambassador. Visiting England a few years after-. wards, Boylston was immediately recognized, and was at once the subject of that rare distinction for Araericans, an election as a FeUow of the Royal Society. Paul Dudley, a son of Gov ernor Joseph, and John Winthrop, a great-grandson of the first Governor, were FeUows about the sarae tirae; and Cotton Mather, who, it is said, co-operated with Boylston, and was, in deed, " the first mover," in introducing inoculation, has also the addendum of P. R. S., and certainly supposed hiraself entitled to it, though some shrewd doubts have been rife in later years whether it was ever actually conferred upon him.^ But Zabdiel Boylston was a man of remarkable qualities ; an eminent natu ralist for that period, eagerly coUecting whatever was rare in the' way of plants and animals, and transraitting specimens of them to England ; while his skill as a physician and surgeon secured him a distinguished reputation both at home and abroad. No name araong the signers of the Petition which resulted in raak ing Brookline a Town, on the 13th of November, 1705, is more worthy of commemoration than that of Boylston. And now, my friends, what was it to be raade a Town ? What was it in that day ? What is it in this ? Profound investiga tions have been raade, from time to time, as to the historical origin of these little municipal organizations. I am content to leave this question to-day, certainly, where John Milton left it two centuries ago. " But I say " (were the words of that wonder ful writer of prose as well as poetry), " but I say that even Towns and Boroughs are more ancient than Kings ; and that the people is the people, though they should live in the open fields." Who can overestimate the importance and dignity of such organiza tions of the people ? The raore any one studies the history of New England, and of Massachusetts in particular, the more he will be impressed with the vast and varied influence which has been exerted by our Town System, not only in promoting the moral and social welfare of the inhabitants, but in advancing and sustaining civil freedom, and in preparing the people for meeting 1 Dr. Allen, in his Biographical Dictionary, says that Mather was made a FeUow in 1713. 38 those great emergencies and exigencies which have successively marked our political progress. The right and the duty of the (fitizens to understand and to manage their own local affairs ; to establish and superintend their own schools ; to organize and enforce their own police ; to lay and levy their own taxes, and to regulate and control the expenditure of the moneys raised by taxation ; freely choosing their own agents for afl these local purposes, and their own Representatives for the larger concerns and counsels of the Commonwealth ; — the possession and the exercise of these special powers and obhgations of Towns, as they were so long known from the earliest period of our Massachusetts History, have done more than afl other things corabined, to quicken the inteUigence, sharpen the faculties, and develop the raanhood and self-reliance of the whole people, and to make thera capable of achieving and upholding the prosperity and the liberty in which we now rejoice. We sometimes speak of Education, as if it were confined to the School-house, the Academy, or the CoUege; and so in great-^ part it must be for the young. But Repubhcan Institutions do not merely deraand education for their support, they supply it in their own nature and essence. Free Governraent is itself an education, which goes on long after Schools and Colleges have done their work. The education of a Free Press ; the education of the Jury-box and of open Court-rooras ; the education of the Reading-roora and the Public Library ; the better and more im portant education of the House of God, where religious freedom and the rights of conscience have been firmly secured ; but greater and more vital than either, in every mere worldly view, the edu cation of the Town Hall, — who can exaggerate the results of thera all? Yes, my friends, these Town Halls, where men are first trained and exercised in watching and in working the ma chinery of self-government, and are habituated not merely to observe and inspect, but to take part in setting in motion, and in keeping in motion, the very springs and wheels and levers of all political action, have furnished, and must always furnish, the true Schools of the Citizen. And how rauch they have done to foster and cherish that spirit of equal rights and individual inde pendence which is at once the source and the safeguard of civil freedom! Tyranny and oppression, at home and abroad, have always dreaded and hated Town meetings. Sir Edmund Andros, when he was playing his fantastic tricks with the New England 39 Colonies, is said to have solemnly prohibited all Town meetings in Massachusetts except once a year on the 3d Monday in May. When Boston, in 1657, thirty years before Andros, had appointed a Committee to consider the model of a Town House, and to take up a subscription " to propagate such a building," she had taken the first step in a path which could have no doubtful ter mination. " Propagating Town houses," as it was quaintly styled, was nothing less than propagating treason and defiance to tyranny and despotism. Had Lord North, a century afterwards, succeeded in shutting up Faneuil HaU, the virtual town house of Boston, a few years earlier than he did, or even in turning the Old South into a Post-Office, — and had silenced Warren and Quincy, and James Otis and Samuel Adams, — the Stamp Act and the Writs of Assistance, the Tea Chests and the British Redcoats, might have encountered a far less stern reception than they did. While, on the other hand, if the centralizing tendencies of modern times, which the wonderful facilities for locomotion and intercommunication have done so much to stimulate, — diminishing so seriously the importance and individuality of the smaller towns, and sometimes swaUowing them up bodily in great cities, — if these tendencies had been possible, and had prevailed, a century and a half ago, we should have looked in vain for not a few of the influences which have most effectively moulded the character and developed the capacity of our people, and made them the free, intelligent, self-relying people which they are at this hour. The remission and relegation of all the affairs of a community, and of almost all their rights and duties except the Elective Franchise, to Boards of Alderraen and Coraraon Councils, is a necessary evil, if not a positive advantage, in great cities ; but the nearer power is kept to its original source, in the deliberate consultations_ and direct acts of the people themselves, the purer and safer will be the administration of local governraent, and the more wiU the people be interested, and instructed, and felt, in the working of Republican institutions. An old Enghsh Poet, two hundred years ago, spoke of making " one city of the Universe ; " ^ and some of our Legislators would seera to have caught the same inspiration. But I may be permitted reverently to doubt, whether the Universe will be quite ready for such a consummation, until the grand prophecy of Holy Writ shafl be accomplished, and the 1 Dryden, in his Annus MirabUis. 40 New Jerusalem be seen descending from heaven, " into which there shafl no wise enter any thing that defileth, neither whatso ever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie." Think not, my friends, that I am pleading against any impend ing danger. If Brookline is indeed ready to relinquish her single- blessedness, and has put on her beautiful garments to-day in preparation for the wedding, it is as little my province to forbid the banns, as it is to give away the bride ; though, perhaps, I may be pardoned for hoping. Churchman as I ara, that the ceremony may be completed without the employment of a ring ! To be made a Town, then, in 1705, was to be adrnitted to an equal partnership in that great company of Massachusetts muni cipalities, which were gradually but surely building up the Colony into a grand Commonwealth, fit to take its stand and do its whole share in establishing and upholding an Independent and United Nation. The old Colony of Plymouth, with all its cherished Pil grim associations, after just threescore years and ten of separate existence, had been made a part of Massachusetts, only fifteen years before, under the new Provincial Charter. There were at that time about eighty-two towns in Massachusetts, not including such as have since fallen within the jurisdiction of Maine, or other adjoining States; there are now, I believe, more than three hundred and forty. Brookline was the eighty- third, if rny careful friend Mr. W. H. Whitmore has counted cor rectly ; ^ and she was not slow in attesting her title to be included in this goodly fellowship. Her records, indeed, afford ample evi dence of the patriotism and public spirit which have characterized her inhabitants in every memorable period from that day to this. I have taken up so much tirne, however, in recounting the expe riences of her earlier days, that I must forbear from following them along in the same detail. I do not regret it, and I hope you may not regret it. The pioneer planters of our viUages and towns, and even the founders and fathers of our State, have long been in danger of being overlooked, and almost forgotten, in the larger concerns and louder claims of later generations. The admirations, I had almost said, the idolatries, of the imrae diate hour, absorb us aU. The present fiUs our view. If it is J It is not altogether easy to give these numbers with precision, owing to the changes in the towns, and in the State, since 1705. By the Table, No. VIL, in the Massachusetts Census of 1865, Brookline would appear to be the seventy-ninth of the then existing towns, in the order of Incorporation. The annexation of Eoxbury and Dorchester to Boston would thus leave her now the seventy-seventh. 41 not he that is living and acting to-day, it is he who died yester day, upon whom aU our praises are lavished, and for whom the stateliest monument or the costliest statue is at once prepared. We must go to the humble village churchyards for the crum bling memorials of some of our noblest builders and benefac tors : — " Their name, their years, spelt by th' unlettered Muse, The place of fame and elegy supply." If I shall only have freshened and deepened the inscriptions on some of those ancient grave-stones, I may safely leave the fame of later generations to others ; — more especially as your " Brook line Transcript " is furnishing from week to week, with an affec tionate interest whieh betrays a lady's pen, the raaterials of a local history, which at no distant day, we trust, may put on the shape of a perraanent volume. Yet I cannot even approach a conclusion of this Address, with out a cursory glance at what Brookline has been doing during the more than a century and half since she assumed her majority and asserted her independence ; and more particularly during the lat ter pkrt of that period. I will not attempt to entertain you with figures, either statistical or rhetorical. The gradual growth of the population, until it now counts nearly seven thousand in habitants and eleven hundred voters, — while in the list of the population of Muddy River in 1687, there were but just fifty names, and Dr. Pierce told us there were only sixty-five voters when he first came here in 1796 ; — the increase of wealth, real, or certainly appraised, until it has been seriously doubted of late whether it be not the richest town of its size in the whole Union ; the diversification of business and industry; the aggregate of crops or of cattle ; the improvement of highways ; the multipli cation bf schools and of churches ; the opening of public Squares and Playgrounds; the establishment of a Public Library; all such details may wefl be left for the Census, or the Annual Re ports of your Selectmen. Nor wiU I rob your Town Records of their interest for the future antiquary or annalist, by reproducing too many of the Resolutions and proceedings which have illus trated the patriotism of the Town, at each succeeding epoch of our Colonial or National history. Those records are, indeed, rich in Revolutionary memorials, as I have found by personal examination, and one or two of the most notable of them I must not omit to mention. 42 On the 15th of December, 1767, it was voted unanimously, " That this Town wfll take afl prudent and legal measures to proraote Industry, Economy, and Manufactures in this Province, and in any of the British American Colonies, and wifl likewise take aU legal measures to discourage the use of European super fluities ; " and five persons, William Hyslop, Esq., Capt. Benja min White, Isaac Gardner, Esq., Mr. John Goddard, and Mr. Samuel AspinwaU, were thereupon appointed a Committee to prepare a form of subscription against receiving such European superfluities. This was Brookline's first response to the mem orable Act of Parliament, which had just imposed a tax of three pence a pound on Tea. On the llth of December, 1772, it was voted to choose a Com mittee to take under consideration the violation and infringe ments of the Rights of the Colonists, and of this Province iu particular, and ".said Committee to be a Committee of comrau nication and correspondence with the Town of Boston and any other Towns on the subject of our present difficulties." On the 26th of November, 1773, Brookline proceeded to ini tiate further and more decisive action in regard to certain cargoes of Tea, then " hourly expected to arrrive." Her Resolutions were strong and uncompromising, as your Records abundantly show. She was, of course, one of the Five Towns — Dorches ter, Roxbury, Brookline, Cambridge, and Charlestown — which were forthwith summoned by Sarauel Adaras to meet Bostoh, in Mass raeeting, at Faneuil Hall on the 29th. The Committees of those five Towns, with that of Boston, were at Faneuil Hafl again, on the 13th of December; and I need not tefl any body that " Boston Harbor was black with unexpected Tea," as Carlyle. describes it, just three days afterwards. On the 1st of March, 1775, we find the Boston Committee of Correspondence, in a letter to the Selectmen of this Town, "acknowledging the receipt of £25. 7? 6J'', in cash, by the hands of our worthy friend, Mr. John Heath, also wood, mutton, rice, corn, &c., it being the very generous donation of the Town of Brookflne to this devoted place, now suffering the severity of ministerial vengeance for nobly exerting themselves in the cause of American Liberty." On the 20th of May, 1776, six weeks before the Declaration of Independence at Philadelphia, it was voted " to advise the 43 person chosen to represent this Town in the next General Court, that if the Honorable Congress should for the safety of the American Colonies declare them Independent of the Kingdom of Great Britain, we the said Inhabitants will solemnly engage with our Lives and Fortunes to support them in the measure." This was Brookline's prompt and categorical response to the question ordered to be propounded to all the towns of Massachu setts, by a vote of the House of Representatives on the 10th of the same month of May, just seven days before. A single week was long enough for notifying and holding the Town meeting, and for deciding on the answer ; and ray valued friend Richard Frothingham, in his admirable History of " The Rise of the Republic," just published, has cited no response so early within a week as that of Brookline. You will not have forgotten, my friends that from July, 1775, to April, 1776, the American Array was encaraped around Bos ton. During a large part, if not the whole, of that period, the Regiment of Colonel Prescott, who had so gaUantly thrown up, and so bravely commanded, the redoubt at Bunker HiU, was sta tioned, together with a Rhode Island Regiment, on yonder Sew all's Farm', a portion of which is now owned and occupied by our worthy feUow-citizen, the Hon. Araos A. Lawrence. The Brookhne Fort at SewaU's Point, of which the outlines may stih be traced, was a very strong and extensive one, occupying a central position between the right and left wing of our Army, and commanding the entrance of Charles River. It is a most welcome and inspiring thought, for this Anniversary and this oc casion, that Washington himself in those days raust often have passed somewhere along these very Brookline roads, such as they then were, on his way from his head-quarters at Carabridge, where Longfellow now lives, to visit the extended lines of the American Camp. He must needs have passed, I think, not far from where we are now assembled, as he crossed from Sewall's Poirit to Roxbury, and so to South Boston, as it is now called, not many days before he stood in triumph on Dorchester Heights to witness the British Fleet setting safl in yonder bay, and the British Forces finally driven out from Boston and its vicinity. We may almost venture to picture him to our mind's eye, at this instant, — reining up, perhaps, at the old AspinwaU elm, or gal loping on to Corey's HUl, or some lesser height, to catch a clearer gflmpse of what the enemy were doing on Boston Common. He 44 is now, at the age of forty-three, in the perfect maturity of his man hood. And what a raanhood it is! There is no mistaking him, closely surrounded, though he may be, by a gaflant staff and a sturdy body-guard. That form of unsurpassed symmetry ! That raodest but commanding and majestic presence ! The bloom of youth not yet faded frora his noble countenance ! A shadow of anxiety may, indeed, now and then be seen stealing over that serene brow ; for we must confess that our New England Militia, with their short enlistments, and their want of ammunition, and their impatience of discipline, often involved him in the deepest concern and perplexity. But not yet has he been worn and weighed down by the cares and toUs of a seven years' war ; not yet by the tremendous responsibilities of inaugurating and ad ministering an untried. National Government. His great heart, his vigorous frame, are still fresh and buoyant. All that Shaks peare has given us of young Harry the Fifth, " with his beaver on, witching the world with noble horsemanship," all except, thank God, the profligate early life ; all that Virgil has told us of the young Marcellus, — ^^ pietas, prisca fides, invictaque hello dex-