"¦^iSS^- HISTORY REGENCY AND REIGN ming iBeovQC tiie ^ifoutttf. By WILLIAM COBBETT. LONDON: PRINTED BV MILLS, JOVVE-fT, AND MILLS, BOLT-COUaT; PUBLISHED BY WILUAM COBBETT, 183, FLEET-STREET. 18.30. PREFACE. 1. The proper business of a Preface is two fold j first, to tell the reader why the work is written and published; and, second, to describe to him the manner in which it is done, and to apprize him of other circumstances the want of a previous knowledge of which might produce inconvenience to him. 2. With regard to the first, the why is, that we may have, at once, a record of the acts and character of the king in question, while these are all fresh in our minds, while a great part of the actors are still alive, while official and other documents are within our reach, while the field is fairly open for controversy on the inatters stated, and, above all, that the History may A 2 PREFACE. be of use; that it may afford us an example of what we ought to follow, or warn us against what we ought to shun. Of what use to us of this day is the history of the tyrant, Henry VIIL, or that of his racking and ripping-up daughter, Elizabeth, compared to what it would have been to our fathers, if written at the close of their savage reigns? And, of what use would the history of the transactions of the late regency and reign be to our great grandchildren, com pared to the use that it must naturally be to us? In short, history, like all other writing, is valuable in the proportion in which it is cal culated to produce good effects; in proportion as it is calculated to stimulate men to useful exertion, or to make them shun that which is mischievous ; in proportion as it is calculated to have a practical effect in the affairs and on the condition of men. To have these effects it must come, not only before the nation have forgotten the transactions and characters to PREFACE. which it relates, but before it has ceased to feel the effects of those transactions. Ancient history may, with a few learned and deep- thiuking persons, be of real use; but, to the mass of mankind, it ean be but little other than romance. 3. It may be said, that the writer, having lived during the period, or part of it, of which he is the historian, may possibly have been engaged in the transactions of it himself, and cannot, therefore, be expected to be so impartial as he ought to be. But, what is the great business of history ? It is to record facts ; and, if the facts be true, of what consequence are the feel ings of the historian ? He may, indeed, when delineating motives and consequences and cha racters, give way to his bias ; but, then, as in the case .o{ the faets, he exposes himself to con tradiction, and the matter is set right; dis cussion takes place ; and out of discussion comes the establishment of truth. PREFACE. 4. There is, however, one disadvantage to set against the advantages of history written imme diately at the end of a reign ; and that is, that, in dealing with character, the historian, in this country and under our present laws, must take great care as to what he says. The writer, at Brighton, who was burnt in effigy, the other day, for hinting that the present king was not a strong-minded man, and the two brothers, who were shut up in different gaols, and heavily fined, for comparing the late king to Sardana- I'ALUS, afford instances that it is not very safe to deal with living characters ; and the prose cution of the latter for a libel on George the Third, years after he was dead, shows clearly, that the nearness of the historian to the period, the transactions of which he records, must be, as far as relates to delineation of character, a great disadvantage. He must (and, upon the whole, this is, perhaps, a good) confine himself to facts, leaving the reader to draw inferences : PREFACE. the less he dabbles in the dirt of debaucheries the better. His business is to show his readers what has been done, and what are, or were, the effects of it: what were the measures of the reign of which he is the historian, and in what way, and to what extent, they produced hap piness or misery, renown or dishonour. 5. So much for the motive of publishing this history at this time : and now, as to the manner. It is published in small Numbers, because that mode gives more time to the reader; engages his attention better; and presses on his purse by degrees. The paragraphs are numbered; be cause by that means the matter is more easily referred to. And it is written in the first PERSON, because I have been an actor in publie matters, during the whole of the period to which the history will relate. 6. For the better understanding of the trans actions of the regency and reign of George the Fourth, it will be necessary to prefix a sketch of PREFACE. that of the country for the whole period from the " Reformation " to the coinmencement of the regency of George the Fourth. It will be a mere sketch; but, it will be found to notice those prominent measures, the fruits of which the English nation has been destined to taste in these latter times. Wm. COBBETT. Kensington, 30th August, 1830. SKETCH HISTORY OF ENGLAND, FROM THE Protestant Reformation to the Regency of Geo. IV. 7. That change in the religion of England, which took place in the reigns of Henry VIIL, Edward VI., and Elizabeth, and which is gene rally called the Reformation, has produced, in process of time, a still greater, and a most fatal, change in the natuie of the English government. Before that event, full one- third part, and, in deed more, of the real property of the country belonged to the church ; that is to say, it was held in trust by the clergy of different denomi-- nations, as bishops, priests, monks, nuns, &c., for the maintenance of religion, and for the re lief of the poor and the stranger. These trustees were, therefore, in fact, the lords, or owners of something approaching to one-half of the whole of the houses and lands of England. 8. From the very nature of the Catholic insti tutions this state of things gave the common a5 INTRODUCTORY people great advantages, and in various ways, especially as it prevented them from being borne down by the aristocracy. Where there is an aris tocracy who are hereditary lawgivers, and are sustained by a law of primogeniture, the com mons, if left without some power to protect them against such an aristocracy, must, in the nature of things, be, whatever they may call themselves, the slaves of that aristocracy. This protection, the commons, or people, of England found in the Catholic church, which not only had an interest always opposed to the encroachments of the aristocracy, but which was, from the very nature of its institutions, the cause of a distribution of property favourable to the commons. In the first place it took a tenth part of the whole of the produce of the earth, and out of it relieved the wants of the poor, the aged, the widow, and the orphan : next, the celibacy of the clergy, that is of the great mass of land-owners, necessarily took from them all motive for accumulating wealth, and caused them to distribute it, in some way or other, amongst the commons : next, the mo nastics, whose estates were immense, could pos sess no private property, and were, of course, easy landlords, let their lands at low rents, and on leases for lives, so that the renters were, in fact pretty nearly the proprietors ; one and the same family of farmers held the same farm for ages- and hence arose the term yeoman, which is re- SKETCH. tained in our law-writs, but which has now no application. The nobility were compeUed to follow, in this respect, the example of the church ; and thus the commons were the joint-proprietors, in fact, of the whole country ; they acknowledged the owner as lord of the soil ; but they held the estates for lives ; they had rents or fines to pay, at stated times, but with this reservation, the estates were theirs ; they could not, like rack • renters, be turned out at the pleasure of the owner ; and, of course, they were independent, free, and bold, just the reverse of the rack- renters of the present day. Another great cause of public happiness, arising out of this distribu tion of property, was, that those great landlords, the clergy, always, from the very nature of the institutions, resided in the midst of their es tates, and, of course, expended their revenues there, returning to those who laboured the fair share of the fruits of their labour ; aud, though the aristocracy had no such positive ties with regard to residence, example must have had, in this respect also, great eflfect upon them. 9. The Reformation broke up this state of society in England ; and it has, at last, pro duced that state which we now behold ; a state of rack-renters, of paupers, and of an aristocracy making the laws and burdening the commons, or people, at their pleasure. The Reformation took from the church, that is, in fact, from the INTRODUCTORY people at large, of whom the clergy vvere the trustees, all their share of the property of the country. If the makers of this Reformation had divided this property amongst ihe people; if they had sold it and applied the proceeds to the use of the nation at large, as was done by the makers of the French Revolution of 1 789, there would have been no real injury done to the commons ; but this is what the makers of the Reformation did not do ; they did precisely the contrary ; and this too from a very obvious cause. The French Revolution was made by the people ; the English Reformation was made hy the aristocracy against the wishes of the people. The French revolu tionists divided the property amongst the people; the English aristocracy took the property to themselves ! 10. But this was not all that they did against the people. Having become the lords of the immense estates of the church, they, as was natural, began to put an end to that joint-pro prietorship which had before existed, and, the lives dying off, they assumed the absolute posses sion : the race of yeomen was, little by little, swept away, and the occupants became rack- renters, wholly dependent on the will of the aristocracy. From even the parochial clergy the aristocracy had taken a great part of their revenue, while, at the same time, they allowed them to marry; and thus were the poor left sketch. without relief, and the churches without revenues to keep them in repair. Yet it was absolutely necessary, that provision should be made for these objects ; for, in the reign of Elizabeth, so great and so general was become the misery of the people, and so manifestly was open rebellion approaching, that it was, after numerous efforts to avoid it, finally resolved on to make by law an effectual and permanent provision for the poor, and for the repair of the churches. And how did reason and justice say that this ought to be done ? By a tax, certainly, exclusively on the property taken from the church and given to the aristocracy. This is what ought to have been done ; aud even this would have been but a poor compensation for all that the commons had lost ; but instead of this a law was made to tax all thepeople for the relief of the poor and for the repairing of the churches ; and this tax, for England alone, now amounts to the enormous sum of seven millions and a half of pounds ster ling in a year. II. The Stuarts, who came to the throne immediately after the making of this law, besides being a feeble race of men, had not the protec tion which Elizabeth had found in the dread which the people had had of seeing the crown on the head of a Frenchman. The Stuarts, nei ther loved nor respected, had not the power to witJi&tand the effects of the old grudge against introductory the aristocracy, combined, as it now was, with the most furious fanaticism, hardly got quietly along through the reign of James I. ; and, in that of Charles I., had to undergo all the suffer ings of a revolution. The Republicans, amidst all their fury against the remains of the Catholic church, did not forget i^s es^a^es; and, in spite of the arguments of the Royalists, proceeded very coolly, and, as all the world must say, very justly, to take the estates back again for pub lic use. 12. The restoration of the Stuarts, which, like that of Louis XVIIL, was produced partly by the tyranny of the man at the head of affairs and partly by treachery, restored these immense estates to the aristocracy ; but did not restore to the Crown the estate which the Republicans had taken from it ; so that, while the aristocracy retained all their enormous increase of wealth and power, the king, like the poor, became a charge on the public revenue; and thus were king as well as people placed at the mercy of the aristocracy ; a state in which they have remained from that day to this, 1 3. Next came the " Glorious Revolution " of 1688; and here the reader must have his senses at command to enable him to set the de lusion oi names at defiance. This revolution was made by the aristocracy, and for their sole bene fit, and, like the Reformation, against the wish SKETCH. of the people. It was forced upon the nation by an army brought from abroad ; it was made by laws, passed by those who had not been chosen by the people to make laws ; and that the revolution was for the benefit of the aristocracy, what need w^ of more proof than is contained in the fol lowing facts, well known to all the world ; that James IL, who was a Catholic himself, wished to place Catholics upon a level with Protestants as to all civil rights ; that the nation was then but at only about fifty years from the death of many who had witnessed the transfer of the church- estates to the aristocracy, only at about forty years from the time when those estates had been taken frcm the aristocracy by the republicans, and applied to public uses, and only at about thirty years from the time when the estates had been given back to the aristocracy again ; that it was evident, that if the king could be a Catholic himself, and were permitted to place Catholics upon a level with Protestants, all men would say, that the Reformation was unnecessary, and that the estates had beeu taken from the Catholic church unjustly, from which conclusion there could be but one step to the resumption of those estates by the nation. 14. To these facts add the following ; that the Prince of Orange was not invited to England by any meeting or assemblage of the people, nor by any person or body of persons chosen by the peo- 1 ntroductory pie for that purpose, or for the making of laws ; that he was invited to England by the aristocracy, and through agents sent to Holland by them ; that the Dutch army, brought over by William, marched to London with him and displaced the English soldiers stationed there ; that the general commanding the English army went over to William ; and that laws were immediately passed for disarming suspected persons, and for ena bling the new government to put info prison whomsoever it suspected of designs hostile to it. Add these facts to the former, and then nothing further need be said with regard to the actors in, or the motives to, this " Glorious Revolution." 15. But, though, by these and similar means, aud by a pretty free use of the gallows and the scaffold, the aristocracy secured the estates for this time, the thing was by no means settled thus. A war with France became necessary "for the preservation of the Protestant reli gion" ; that is to say, the quiet possession of the church-estates. To carry on this war, and to bind the monied people to the new govern ment, it was necessary to borrow money ; and hence arose, the funds, the bank, and the national debt. These brought taxes, and so heavy as to create great discontents. The people felt them selves loaded with ten or twelve millions a year, instead of the million and a half, wliich they had had to pay in the reign of James II. ; so sketch. that, soon after the accession of George L, the first king of the House of Brunswick, he had to encounter an open rebellion ; and the aristocracy, though they had so pared down the independence and power and influence of the people, found it necessary to pare it down still more ; and this they eflfected in the year 1715, by an act, called the Riot act, and by another called the Septennial mi, 16. By the first of those laws all assemblages cf the people out of doors were, in effect, put down. And, why was this ? Certainly not be cause they were favourable to the government. But the Septennial bill can leave no doubt in the mind of any man. One of the charges against the Stuarts was, that they had not -called new parliaments frequently enough ; and that, thus, they had deprived the people of the power of changing their representatives as often as raight be necessary. The right of the people was to choose a new parliament every year. But, those who introduced William, did not re store this right ; but enacted, that, in future, there should be a new parliament every three years. However, in 1815, they found, that the people had still too much power ; and, in this year, they, whom the people had chosen for three years, made a law to authorise themselves to sit for four years longer ! Aye, and that every future parliament should sit for seven years introductory instead of three ; though the declaration against the Stuarts stated, that " new Parliaments ought to be frequently called," and that this was an unalienable right of the people of England. 17. But, audacious as this was in itself, it was less audacious than the pretexts set forth for the passing of the law. These were, that su^h fre quent elections were attended with " grievous expenses " ; that they caused " violent and last ing heats and animosities"; and that they might, at this time, favour the views of a " restless and " popish faction in causing the destruction of the "peace and security of the government." Now, if this had been a mere faction, why take away the rights of all the people, in order to counter act its restlessness ! Why, in order to keep down a mere faction, subvert the fundamental laws and usages of the country, and violate, in this daring manner, the solemn compact so re cently entered into between the crown and the people ! IS. It was, then, under the auspices of the Riot act and of the Septennial act that the House of Brunswick began its reign in England ; and, though Mr. Canning will not, by those who knew him, be deemed much of an authority upon the subject, he did say, in the House of Commons, in 1822, that, if the people of Eng land could have had their will, the House of Brunswick would never have worn the Crown of sketch. this kingdom. The dislike of the people was not, however, to the House of Brunswick, but to the exercise of the power of the aristocracy, who, by this last-mentioned act, left hardly the sem blance of power in the hands of the people. The members of that house have, in general, con ducted themselves with great moderation ; but, in its name, the aristocracy has gone on with its encroachments, which, however, seem at last to be destined to counteract themselves. 19. The "^ZonoMS revolution" hrought wars ; first for the keeping out of James and his family, and second for the preservation oi Holland and of Hanover. These brought debts; and these brought taxes. The American colonies, now the United States, all of which, observe, had been settled by the Stuarts, began, in 1770, to present food for taxation. The parliament (the Sep tennial parliament) passed laws to tax them. The Americans had seen how their brethren in England had, by degrees, lost their property and their liberty. They raised the standard of " No taxation without representation;" the septennial parliament raised the standard of "Unconditional Submission;" the battle began ; and how it ended all the world knows. 20. It was impossible for these two standards to remain raised for seven years, as they did, without attracting the attention of the world, and particularly of the intelligent and brave people introductory of Fiance, especially as the latter had to take a part in the conflict. The success of the Ameri cans, in conjunction with the armies of France, beckoned to the people of France to follow the bright example. As it was absolutely impossible for Lafayette not to imbibe the principles of Washington, so it was impossible that the French shoidd not imbibe the principles of the Ameri cans. And, now it was that our aristocracy be gan to see the effects of their septennial system recoil upon themselves. The French people, who, as Fortescue clearly shows, had never derived from the Catholic church the benefits which the English had derived from it ; the French people, always borne down by a great standing army, while England had none ; the French people, pressed to the earth by taxes, partial as well as cruelly heavy, such as England had, at that time, never heard of; the French people, insulted in their wretchedness by a haughty, a squandering, and most profligate court, and higher clergy; this oppressed and brave people resolved, in 1789, no longer to endure the degrading curse, and, at one single effort, swept away their grinding and insolent aristocracy and clergy, and, in their rage, the throne itself; and, by that act, sent dread into the heart of every aristocrat upon the face of the earth. 21. Our septennial law-makers remained, how ever, spectators for about two years and a half; sketch. but, in the meanwhile, the example was working here. The Septennial bill had produced all its natural consequences, wars, debts, and taxation ; and, as the cause of the evils was seen, the peo ple had begun, even during the American war, to demand a Reform in the Commons House of Parliament as the only cure for existing evils, and as the only security against their recurrence for the future. When the standard of the right of representation had been raised by thirty millions of people only twenty miles from them, those of England could not be expected to be dead to the call. They were not ; and it required no long time to convince our aristocracy that one of two things must take place 5 namely, that the French people must be compelled to return under their ancient yoke; or, that a change must take place in England, restoring to the people the right of freely choosing their representatives; the con sequences of which, to this aristocracy, were too obvious to need pointing out, even to parties not deeply interested in those consequences. The obstacles to war were very great. There was the DEBT, which, by the unsuccessful American war, had been made to amount to a sum, the annual interest of which demanded six times the amount of the taxes which had existed in the reign of James II. There were, besides, heavy burdens entailed upon the country by that war on account of half-pay and of other things. On the other INTRODUCTORY hand, we had a most advantageous commercial treaty with France, which the Republicans in France were ready to continue in force. The interests of the people of England manifestly pointed to peace : their wishes, too, were in favour of peace; and this latter is proved by their conduct, and still more clearly by the Pro clamations for checking French principles ; by the Aristocratical Associations formed for that purpose ; and by the terrible laws passed for the purpose of cutting off all communication between the people of the two countries. 22. But the alternative was, Parliamentary Reform, or put down the Republic of France. That really was the alternative, and the only one. The former ought to have been chosen; but the latter was resolved on, and that, too, in spite ofthe acknowledged risk of failure; for, so much did the aristocracy dread the other alternative, that failure, when compared with that, lost all its terrors. To war then they went; in war they continued for twenty-two years, except the short respite procured by the peace of Amiens, which was, in fact, a truce rather than a peace. At the end of twenty-two years, Louis XVIIL was re stored to the throne of France; but of that event and its causes and consequences, the details will come into the history to which this sketch is an introduction. 23. During the fight every thing but the dread sketch. of the eifect of the example of the French ap pears to have been overlooked by our aristocracy ; and, of course, they thought nothing ofthe debt which they were contracting, though that was, as the sequel will show, destined to undo all that they were doing against the French, and to ren der that parliamentary reform, which it had been their great object to root out of the minds of the people, more necessary and more loudly called for than ever. They had advanced only about six years in the war when they found themselves compelled to resort to a paper-money, and to make it a legal tender. This was a very import ant crisis in the affairs of the septennial parlia ment and of the aristocracy, and the consequences which have resulted, and will result from it, are to be ranked amongst those which decide the fate of governments. Therefore this matter calls for full explanation. 24. At the time when this war began, 1793, William Pitt, a son ofthe late Earl of Chat ham, was the Prime Minister. He had estab lished what he called a Sinking Fund, and had adopted other measures for reducing the amount of the DEBT, which had now reached the fearful amount of two hundred millions and upwards. A new war was wholly incompatible with Pitt's schemes of reduction ; and he, of course, would be, and he really was, opposed to the war of 1793, though he carried it on (with the excep- introductory tion of the truce before-mentioned) until the day ofhis death, which took place in 1806. And here we behold the direct, open, avowed, and all-ruling power of the aristocracy ! This body had, for many years, been divided into two " parties," as they called them, bearing the two nick-names of Tories and Whigs, the etymology of which is of no consequence. The Tories af fected very great attachment to the throne and the church; the Whigs affected perfect loyalty, indeed, but, surprising devotion to the rights erf the people, though it was they who had brought in the Dutch king and his army, and who had made the Riot act and the Septennial bill ; so that, if they were the friends of the people, what must their enemies have been 1 The truth is, there was no difference, as far as regarded the people, between these two factions ; their real quarrels were solely about the division of the spoil; for, whenever any contest arose between the aristocracy and the people, the two factions had always united in favour ofthe former; and thus it was in regard to that all-important ques tion, the war against Republican France. 25. Pii'T, who was the son of a Whig- Pen sioner and had begun his career, not only as a Whig, but as a Parliamentary reformer, was now atthe head of the Tories ; and Charles Fox, who had not only been bred a Tory and begun his career as a Tory, but who had, and v.'ho held sketch. to the day of his death, two sinecure offices, was at the head of the Whigs. These were the two men of the whole collection who could talk loudest, longest, and most fluently, and who were, therefore, picked out by their respective parties to lead in carrying those " debates," as they are called, which have been one of the great means of amusing and deluding and enslav ing this nation. Every effort was made by the respective parties to exalt their champions in the public estimation : they were represented as the two most wonderful men that the world had ever seen: as orators, Pitt was compared to Cicero, and Fox to Demosthenes : Pitt, as a lawgiver, surpassed Lycurgus ; Fox more nearly resem bled Solon ! The people, always credulous and vain enough as to such matters, carried away by the jugglery, ranged themselves under one or the other of these paragons and took their respective names as marks of honourable distinction ; and thus, for thirty long years, were the industrious and sincere and public-spirited people of this country divided into Pittites and Foxites ; thus were they for those thirty years the sport of the aristocracy who employed these political im postors, while every year of the thirty savv an addition to their burdens and a diminution of their liberties, 26. In this state stood the factions, when, in 1793, came the question of war against the B introductory Republic of France. Pitt, for the reasons before stated, was decidedly opposed to war. The por tion of the aristocracy that supported him were for war; but, they were for their leader too, because, if he quitted his post. Fox came in with the tribe of Whigs at his heels. Besides, a vast majority of the people, whether Pittites or Fox ites, were against the war. So that Pitt had reason, to fear, that, with a war on his shoulders, he would be unable to retain his power. But the Foxite portion of the aristocracy, seeing the common danger, and seeing the grounds of Pitt's opposition to war, went over and joined the Pittite party ; leaving Fox with a small party about him, to carry on that " constitutional o^^'osition" which was necessary to amuse and deceive the people. 27. Thus supported by the two bodies of the aristocracy united, Pitt went into this memorable war, which, though attended with numerous im portant consequences, was attended with none equal, in point of ultimate effect, to the measures by which paper- money was made a legal tender in 1797. The aristocracy, in resorting to this expedient, were not at all aware, that, though it gave them strength for the time, it must, in the end, bereave them of all strength ; that it must take from them the means of future wars, or compel them to blow up that system of debts and funds, which had been invented bv them as a sketch. rock of safety, and without the existence of which the whole fabric of their power must go to pieces. 28. In the meanwhile, however, on they went with the war, and with the struggle between them and the people on the score of Parliamentary Reform ; the people ascribing the war and all its enormous debts and taxes to the want of that refonn, and the aristocracy ascribing their com plaints to seditious and treasonable designs, and passing laws to silence them, or punish them ac cordingly. When this war began (1793) the Septennial bill had been in existence seventy- nine years, and that it had produced its natural fruits is clearly proved by the following unde niable facts ; namely, that, at the time of the ** Glorious Revolution," in 1688, one of the charges against King James was, "that he had *' violated the freedom of election of members to " serve in parliament"; that, one of the standing laws of parliament is, " that it is a high crime " and misdemeanor in any peer to interfere in the *' election of members to serve in the House of "Commons"; that, in 1793, Mr. Grey, novv Earl Grey, presented a petition to the House of Commons, signed by himself and others, stating, " that a decided majorify of that House was re- " turned by one hundred and fifty -four men partly " peers, and partly great commoners, and by the " ministry of the day ; " that he offered to u 2 introductory prove the allegation by witnesses at the bar of the House, and that he was not permitted to bring his witnesses to the bar ; that there was an ap pendix to this petition, containing a list of the names of all the peers and great commoners, who thus returned the members, exhibiting the num ber of members returned by each, and that this list is recorded in the Annual Register for the year 1793; that, in 1779, the House of Com mons had resolved, that an attempt to traffic in seats in that House was " highly criminal in a '¦' minister ofthe king ; that it was an attack on " the dignity and honour of the House, an in- " fringement on the rights and liberties of the " people, and an attempt to sap the basis of " our free and happy constitution;" that, on the 25th April, 1809, Lord Castlereagh, then a minister of the king, having been proved to have thus trafficked, the House resolved, " that " it was its bounden duty to maintain, at all " times, a jealous guard on its purity, the at- " tempt, in the present instance, not having been " carried into effect, the House did not think it " necessary to proceed to any criminating reso- " lutions"; that, alas! in only sixteen days after this, Mr. Madocks, member for Boston, accused this same Castlereagh, together with two other ministers of the king, not only with traf ficking in a seat, but of having completed the bargain, and carried it into full effect ; that. sketch. having made this charge, Mr. Madocks moved, that the House should inquire into the matter ; that the House then debated upon this motion ; that there were three hundred and ninety-five members present ; and that (hear it, every honest man on earth 1) three hundred and ten voted against all inquiry, and that, too, as the speakers in the debate openly declared, " because this " traffic was as notorious as the sun at noon "day"! 29. Such was the state of things in the year 1809. The next year George III. became, from insanity, incapable of performing the office of king ; then, therefore, began the Regency of his eldest son and heir apparent, and it is of this ten years' regency, and of the ten years' reign that followed it, that the following is the history. B 3 HISTORY REGENCY AND REIGN OF GEORGE IV. CHAPTER I. From the Birth of the King to his Mari'iage. 30. This king, who was born on the 12th of August, in the year 1762, was the eldest son of King George III., and of Charlotte, Princess of Mecklenburgh Strelitz. Matters relating to his childhood and his boyish days are as uninterest ing to the world as are the matters relating to a blackbird, or linnet, from the time of its being hatched to that of its flying from the paternal nest. Matters relating to his amours, and other sensual indulgences, at a more advanced period, could, even if we could come at an accurate de- history of [Chap. tail of them, only serve as entertainment to the idle, encouragement to the profligate, and to fill the sensible and sober with disgust. To be sure, as a cause oi great expense to the nation, he was always, from his very birth, an object of interest; but, unless vve knew, or had heard of, something in his juvenile conduct to hold up as an example to our children, which, as far as my knowledge and hearing have gone, is not the case here, it is best to pass over this comparatively insignificant part of his life, come at once to the period when he came openly in contact with the nation's purse, and, turning a deaf ear to both sycophants and satirists, relate truly what he did, or what was done in his name, leaving the world to judge of his character by his actions, 31. For these reasons I shall pass over all the previous part of this king's life, and come at once to the time when he entered into that mar riage which led to consequences which have en gaged the attention, as well as excited some de gree of feeling, in every part of the civilized world. The brave and unfortunate Caroline, who was the victim of this matrimonial contract, and of whose persecutions, sufferings, death, and burial, the historian's duty will be to give, in the proper place, a full and faithful account, was the second daughter of Charles William, Duke of Brunswick, and was, at the time of her marriage, twenty-sixyearsof age. ThePrince of Wales (since I.] GEORGE IV. George IV.), her husband, who had then attained the age of thirty three years, was greatly embar rassed with debts, which, until this marriage was proposed, the nation was by no means disposed to pay. The country was at this time involved in a most expensive and wasteful war against the people of France : a war undertaken to put down princi ples, and, in the opinions of all considerate men, tending to produce, eventually, great suffering to the English nation ; and, therefore, the people were not in a very good humour with royalty, 32. The discussions relative to the American revolution had produced a revolution in France ; and it had been found, that, in like manner, this latter event would produce a revolution in Eng land. Various are the words made use of by the parties in the disputes touching these revolii- tions; but the short and true state of the case is this : thepeople of all these nations were become sensible that they suffered from the whole of the governing powers being in the hands of theprivi- leged orders. The Americans had successfully resisted the attempts to keep them under the yoke. The French had risen and broken the yoke to pieces. And now the English were making an attempt to regain their right of choosing their representatives. 33. In the midst of a general ferment, arising from this cause, war against the French people was commenced by Pitt, in 1793, which war HISTORY OF [Chap. was going on at the time of the marriage of the Prince of Wales with the Princess of Brunswick. The taxes, on account of the war, pressed hea vily upon the nation ; the government armed itself at all points. Soldiers of all descriptionsj barracks ; new laws relative to the press ; the Habeas Corpus Act was suspended ; every thing, in short, to restrain and compel ; but still money was necessary ; and, under such circumstances, an enonnous sum, granted to pay the debts oi a prince who had always received a large annual stipend out of the taxes, was what even Pitt, daring as he was, had not the confidence to pro pose vvithout being furnished with some plausible pretence for the proposition. The marriage, as we shall by-and-by see, furnished this pretence ; and every thing that could be thought of was done to make the people part with the money freely. 34. The marriage took place on the Sth of April ; and though it was, of course, to be consi dered as a measure of state-policy, it certainly gave great and universal satisfaction. The Prince, notwithstanding his extravagance, was, &t this time, by no means unpopular. He had been studiously shut out from all public authority, vvas regarded as in opposition to his father's ministers, and, as those were very cordially and justly hated, the Prince, except with regard to his expenses, stood in rather a favourable light. The Princess, who was of a most frank and kind disposition. I.]: GEORGE IV. extremely affable and gracious in her deportment, by no means suflfered in a comparison with the Queen ; and, upon the whole, the nation seemed delighted vvith the prospect that their future king and queen held out to them. 35. In a few days after the celebration of the- marriage ; that is to say, on the 27th of April, the king officially communicated to the parlia ment his request, that a settlement should be made on the Prince, suitable to the alteration in his situation ; and he observed, at the same time,, that " the benefit of any settlement that the " House might raake must fail in its most desir- " able effect, if means were not provided to " extricate his Royal Highness from the incum- " brances under which he laboured to a great " amount," 36. Upon this message from the king, Pitt founded his proposition to the House. Those membeis who composed what was called the opposition, or Whigs, or, at least, the most active; of them, such as Fox, Sheridan, the Duke of Bedford and others, were also personal friends of tbe Prince. They, therefore, were ready- to conr cur with the minister in this particular case. But, there were men, on both sides of the House, to. oppose any grant of money with a view of paying the debts of the Prince. Amongst these was Mr, Grey, now Earl Grey, who actually made a motion to take 20,000^. a year from the sum pro- HISTORY OF [Chap. posed by the minister. This motion was lost ; but 99 members voted for it ; and the speech of Mr. Grey was well calculated to producfe upon the country an impression very little favourable to the Prince, who had had his debts paid by par liament once before, and who was now pretty loudly reminded of that fact by some members' sitting on both sides of the House. 37. This former payment of the Prince's debts' took place in 1787. The amount was, at that time, very large ; and, certainly, with a clear annual allowance of sixty thousand pounds, money enough to maintain 3,000 labourers' fami lies, the nation had a right to complain, when a new clearing off of debts was called for. Never theless the new debt, which had arisen, the rea der will perceive, in the space of little more than seven years, amounted to the enormous sum of 639,890/. sterling ; that is to say, to 80,000/, for every year since the last clearing off of his debts ; and, as will be perceived, to 20,000/. a-year more than the whole of his annual allow ance. Thus he had been spending at the rate of 140,000/. a-year instead of 60,000/., and had been living on what would have maintained 7,000 labourers' families! 38. The minister, who liked well enough to make this exhibition of the Prince, proposed, as the amount of his new settlement, 125,000/. a year, besides the rents of the Duchy of Cornwall, I.] GEORGE IV. valued at 13,000/. a year more. But out of this 138,000/. a year, 73,000/. was to go towards the payment of his debts, and was to be placed, for that purpose, in the hands of commissioners! Thus leaving him 65,000/. a year to live on, a sum not equal to half of that which he had annually expended for seven years before. At the same time an act of parliament was passed " to pre- " vent future princes of Wales from contracting " debts," an act which seemed wholly unneces sary, except for the purpose of conveying, in an indirect way, the censure of the parliament on the conduct of the prince. As to " future princes of Wales," this was, however, an act of flagrant injustice. It was an act to keep them, by law, in a state below that of what the law calls a femme covert, and, indeed, to keep them in a state of infancy ; a state little compatible with the sacredness of the person of the party. But, as we shall all along perceive, it has been the constant policy of the aristocracy to prevent the kingly part of the government from being over burdened with popularity or respect. 39. The minister was most vehemently cen sured for this by the personal friends of the prince, who declared it to be an insult intended and contrived; and this it certainly was. Yet it was not easy to blame Pitt and his party for their conduct upon this occasion ; for how was a minister, after the large sum paid for a similar c HISTORY OF [Chap, purpose, in 1787? again to call upon the nation for an immense sum to pay oflf the prince's debts, without doing something that should amount to a censure on him by whom those debts had been contracted? The transactions of 1787 had left the prince no justification and no excuse for this new mass of debts. At that time he had had, from the time ofhis coming of age in 1783, an al lowance from the king, out of the civil list, of 50,000/. a year ; an allowance enormous, espe cially if we consider the then low price of all household expenses. Nevertheless, it required but four years to involve the prince in debts ; a cir cumstance that reflected less credit on him thanthe friends of kingly government could have wished to see belong to so distinguished a branch of the royal family ; a circumstance, in fact, which was, in itself, no weak argument in favour of the French, who were contending for a Republican government. 40. It was not, therefore, without some severe animadversions on his conduct, that the House of Commons entertained a proposition to pay oflf the debts of 1787; and they did not pass the grant, until the king had given them the strong est assurances, that a similar application, for a similar purpose, would never again be made. In his message ofthe 21st of May, 1787, the king, after expressing his great concern at being under the necessity of acquainting the House of the L] GEORGE IV. extent of the prince's debts, and after observing \\ovr painful it was to him to propose, on this account, an addition to the burdens ofhis people, proceeds thus : "His Majesty could not, however, *' expect or desire the assistance of this House, *' but on a well-grounded expectation that the "prince will avoid contracting any debts in fu- " ture. With a vievv to this object, and not from " any anxious desire to remove any possible doubt " ofthe sufficiency of the prince's income to sup- "port amply the dignity of his situation, his " majesty has directed a sum of 10,000/. per an- " num to be paid out of his civil list, in addition " to the allowance which his majesty has hither- " to given him ; and his majesty has the satis- "faction to inform the House, that the Prince of " Wales has given his Majesty the fullest assu- " ranee ofhis determination to confine his future " expenses ivithin his income, and has also settled "a plan for arranging those expenses in the "several departments, and for fixing an order for '' payment under such regulations as his majesty " trusts will effectually secure the due execution " of the prince's intentions," 41. Upon this message the minister proposed, and the parliament voted, the sum of 161,109^. to pay oflf the debts ; a sum perfectly monstrous, if we consider the prices of things at the time, and if we also consider, that it must have been contracted within the short space of about three c2 HISTORY OF [Chap. years and a half. The nation, however, always foolishly liberal, seems to have been willing to overlook the past, in consequence of the solemn assurances oi the prince, conveyed to it under the hand of the king himself, that this should be the last application of the kind. 42. When, therefore, another application of precisely the same kind vvas to be made, how could any minister advise the king to make it, without accompanying that application with a proposal to do a something in the way of security for the future, and of censure for the past ? Ac cordingly the king recommended and the parlia ment adopted, in 1795, the appointment of com- missionersto superintend thepayment of thedebts, and the passing of the act before-mentioned. 43. It is easy to conceive how disagreeable it must have been to the prince to have every debt, and the nature of every debt, canvassed before commissioners ! And how very different this was from placing, at once, the 639,890/. at his own disposal. There was a commission to sit for at least nine years, as they were to pay only 73,000/. a year. All this time there must neces sarily be a great many discontented creditors, who are by no means the most patient or most friendly of mortals. The prince was a debtor all the while; and, while the nation thought, and truly thought, his allowance very large, he found that what he was receiving was much I.] GEORGE IV, too small for those purposes which he deemed his wants. 44. Thus his marriage, instead of affording the prince thdX relief from embarrassment, which his friends said he had been led to expect from it, was, to him, a season of the deepest humiliation. Those friends were very loud in their reproaches against the minister ; and the prince's brother, the Duke of Clarence (now William IV.) said, in his place in the House of Lords, that, " when " the marriage of the prince was agreed upon, " there was a stipulation that he was to be ex- " oneratedfrom his debts," 45. The marriage had failed, therefore, of ac complishing one of its apparent objects. In such cases personal affection is never much to be relied on. The thing is altogether an aflfair of state- policy ; and, under circumstances such as have here been stated, it is but too natural to suppose that the other party in the marriage would derive no advantage from the disappointment of the above-mentioned pecuniary hopes. There were, indeed, added to the annual sum, 27,000/. for expenses of the marriage ; 28,000/. for jewels and plate ; and 26,000/. to finish the prince's palace of Carlton House : but, there was a con trol as to the expenditure of those sums, which were by no means to be spent by the prince. So that in fact, his pecuniary circumstances, his ca pacity of spending money, became lowered, and HISTORY OF [Chap. greatly lowered, by his marriage, which of neces sity augmented his household expenses. 46. It is very true, that 65,000/. a year, clear of all taxes, undeducted from by house-rent, fur niture, repairs, and many other of those outgoings which so largely deduct from other men's incomes, was a sum so large, that one can hardly ima gine how it was to be disposed of without an abso lute throwing of it away. But having seen, that, during the seven years previous to the mar riage, the prince had expended 140,000/. a year, we are not to be surprised, that he expe rienced deep mortification at being reduced to less than half the sum ; and, especially when he saw his stipend placed in the hands of commis sioners, responsible to the law for the distribution of the money. 47. This mortification was strongly expressed by his friends in parhament; and, certainly, any thing more mortifying, more humiliating, cannot well be imagined than the provisions of the act relating to the application of the new settlement of 140,000/. a year. The commissioners were to be, thc speaker of the House of Commons ; the chancellor of the Exchequer ; the master of the King's household; the accountant-general of the court of Chancery ; and the surveyor-gene ral of the crown-lands. They were to have complete power to examine all creditors on oath; to inquire into the origin and nature of every IJ GEORGE IV. debt ; to watch over the future expenditure; and, in short, to be absolute, as to all the pecu niary aflfairs of the prince, who was placed under a guardianship and control as severe as if he had still been an infant, or something even lower in the scale of intellectual capacity. 48. Francis Duke of Bedford, in advert ing to these measures, in his place in parliament, vehemently censured the ministers. He said, that " a variety of circumstances would occur to " candid minds in extenuation of the errors of " the prince, which were of 2, juvenile description, *' and did by no means call for asperity of cen- "sure." ITie Earl of Lauderdale said, that " it did not become so great and opulent a peo- "ple to act with severity towards a young " prince, from who se virtues, abilities, and ac- " complishments, they might justly expect to " derive so much contentment." 49. The nation, however, does not appear to have thought that thirty-three years of age was a very "juvenile " stage oflife. If it were such, however, in this particular case, the nation could see no objection to a guardianship, and control such as are usual in the "juvenile " state. And as to those virtues and abilities oi which the Earl of Lauderdale spoke, though no one was pre sumptuous enough to deny, or to express a doubt as to their existence ; no one, on the other hand, appeared to be able to deduce a proof of them. HISTORY OF [Chap. from what had happened in 17S7j or from the present exhibition of debts which had been con tracted notwithstanding the solemn assurances given at the former period. 50. Harsh, severe, humiliating, as the measures of Pitt certainly were, they met with the appro bation of the nation at large, who, whatever they might think of the prince himself, had a very bad opinion of some, at least, of those who were re garded as being in his confidence and in his fa vour. Besides, the nation looked attentively at the causes of the debts. They looked at the list of claimants and of claims. They looked at the items; and in them they did not discover any thing which seemed to form a compensation, either in possession or in hope, for the immense sums which the prince's indulgences had drained from the fruit of their labour. Indeed, the princess seems to have been, in regard to this point, their only source of consolation. Con cluding, from the experience of mankind, that matrimony would put an end to those things which had been so costly to them, and had so long filled them with alarm, they looked upon the princess as giving them much better security than they could have in commissionerships and acts of parliament. 51. The ma»iage had brought the prince a wife, but it had brought him none of those other things which his friends and partizans, at least. I] GEORGE IV. said he expected from it ; and it had brought him worse than no fortune at all ; for it had, in fact, taken from him, as to the management of his pe cuniary concerns, all sort of power, and even of influence. The reader will judge for himself, whether these immediate consequences of the marriage (so different from those that had been anticipated) were likely to operate in the mind of the husband favourably towards the wife. Precisely how they did operate we cannot pretend to know; but certain it is that domestic happi ness was not long an inmate at Carlton House. 52. The mortification of the prince seemed to admit of little addition : it seeined to be com plete ; but it did receive an addition in the con duct of the parliament towards the princess, on whom, by an act pased on the same day with that which established a commission to manage the aflfairs of the Prince, they settled a jointure of 50,000/. a year, leaving the expenditure entirely under her own control! Thereby making by law a contrast between the husband and wife, to the disgrace of the former. Never did the prince to the hour of his death forget this ! Mr. Grey, who was in fact the beginner of the attack upon bim, he never forgave ; and this is the real cause of his unconquerable aversion to every arrange ment that included the putting of Lord Grey into power. Certainly, the treatment of the prince in this case, was, in itself considered, most in- c5 HISTORY OF [Chap. I. suiting ; but before we say that a man is insulted, we must consider what the man is; and not merely what his rank is, but vvhat his character is, and what his conduct has been ; and if we thus consider in this case, we cannot say that there could be an insult inflicted; for, what, alas ! was that character, and what had been that conduct? Chap, IL] GEORGE IV. CHAPTER II. From the Marriage ofthe King, in April, 1795, to the commencement of his Regency, in July, 1811. 53. It was not in reason nor in nature to expect, that a marriage, a marriage of mere state-policy, and attended by circumstances so mortifying to the husband as those detailed in the foregoing chapter, should be happy, espe cially when that husband had at his nod scores of women, equal in point of accomplishments and far surpassing in personal charms, the lady with whom it was his lot to be united; that such a marriage should be happy was not to be expected ; but, it might have led to a life free from scandal, free from disgrace, free from cruelty to the disliked party, and free from measures throwing enormous burdens on the people ; it might have been free from all these ; it might not have been made the cause of taking from the labour of the people a million of pounds, or thereabouts, in measures to bring HISTORY OF [Chap. disgrace and infamy on this unfortunate lady ; and it might not have been the cause of keeping millions of Catholics out of the enjoyment of their rights for, at least, twenty-four years, and thereby producing troubles, commotions, and bloodshed without end : it might have been free from all these consequences, and, as the sequel will most amply prove, it was productive of them all, 54. When vve behold such mighty and fatal effects, arising, as we shall see these did, from the mortification, the caprice, or the antipathy, from the mere selfish passions, and, almost, from the animal feelings and propensities, of one sin gle man; when we see a whole community thus aflflicted, and its peace and even greatness endan gered by such a cause, must we not be senseless indeed, must we not be something approaching to brutes, if we do not seek for some means of protecting ourselves against the like in future ? This king has, by his parasites (and enough of them he always had), been called the " first gentleman in his kingdom." Gentleman is a very equivocal term ; but, if its meaning be to be interpreted by the conduct of George IV., it will hardly be greatly coveted by the majority of mankind. He had, in this case, two duties to fulfil, both of a sacred nature ; one towards his wife; and another towards that virtuous, industrious, forgiving, and too generous people. IL] GEORGE IV. from whose care and toil he had, for thirty-three years, derived the means of living in ease, splen dour, and even extravagance. 55. With regard to the first of these duties, though the law restrained him in the choosing of a wife, this restraint was a condition upon which he was to enjoy royal magnificence and power ; and, though it restrained him in his choice, it did not compel him to marry any body. A good and dutiful son, even in the lowest walks of life, will hesitate long before he marry against the loish of his father and family. So that there is no excuse to be built on this ground. He was perfectly free to refuse the hand of the lady that had been chosen for him ; to take that hand was his own voluntary act; therefore, he was bound by every tie that ought to bind a husband; and, though personal affec tion was wanting, were there not the dictates of justice ? Was there not his solemn vow ; did he not promise before God, that he would love and cherish and keep constant to this lady ? Was there not, supposing a want of every- thing else, common humanity to tell him, that it was cruel to the last degree even to slight a person situated as the princess was, in a foreign country, cut oflf from home, parents, and friends, sur rounded with envious rivals and satirists, and placed solely under his protection and at his mercy ? Amongst the honest boasts of England, HISTORY OF [Chap. is, that it possesses " manly hearts to guard the fair," As far as belonged to the people of England, the unfortunate Caroline experienced the literal truth of this poetic description; but, we shall presently see how it was exemplified in the conduct of him who was one day to be their king, and the mildness of whose reign and gene rosity oi whose character have been extolled by those who were amongst his intimates and coun cillors. 56. As to his duty towards the nation, it bound him, in the first place, to refrain from any indulgence, from giving way to any passion, from doing any-thing which, operating in the way of example, might be injurious to public morals. We are all aware of the powers oi fashion; we know that in dress, in eating, in drinking, in sports and pastimes of all sorts, the high are fol lowed as nearly as possible by the low. As the servant-maid imitates as nearly as possible the dress of her mistress, and the footman the airs of his master, so will a people imitate, in a greater or less degree, the example of their rulers. If snuff became sought after because it was by a shrewd tobacconist named "Prince's mixture" is it to be believed that ill-treatment of a wife at Carlton House would not have its pernicious in fluence on every man at all prone'to disregard the marriage vow ? Besides, for what had the nation given to this prince such enormous sums of money? IL] GEORGE IV. For what had it a second time discharged the long score of his squanderings ? For the purpose of seeing him lead a life of sobriety, order, and conjugal fidelity; for the purpose of seeing a family of children about him; for the purpose of seeing him not only not a bad example to married men, but to set a good example ; and finally to render all dispute about succession to the throne next to impossible, and to prevent that which Englishmen have always hated, that suc cession calling in foreigners to reign. These were the purposes for which the nation had made such great pecuniary sacrifices ; and he by his conduct to his wife defeated them all ; and by tliat conduct, and that conduct alone, laid the foundation of all those discontents, troubles, com motions, and all that waste of money and that spilling of blood, to which I have alluded in the first paragraph of this present chapter ; and of this fact no man, when he is fully informed of ali the circumstances, can possibly doubt. 57. The marriage, as we have seen, took place on the Sth of April, 1795. On the 7th January, 1796, two days only short of nine months, the princess was delivered of a daughter, who was baptized by the name of Charlotte, and of whose premature death I shall in due time and place have to speak. During these nine months even, the princess has since complained, not only of neglect the most mortifying, but of indignities HISTORY OF [Chap, the most gross and insupportable. She was a woman of too high a spirit to endure this treat ment unresented, CrueUy and cowardice always go together ; or the former, at least, is never unaccompanied by the latter. Men are cruel, in many cases, only because they are cowardly. The courageous robber even spares the life of his victim ; the cowardly one kills him, lest he should bring him to justice. The princess did not bear her ill-treatment with tameness; she made her husband feel that she was not to be insulted with impunity ; but this, of course, only added to his antipathy; which at the end of only one year and five or six days from the day of the marriage, led to a message from him to her proposing a sepa ration from bed and board. It was a lord who had the high honour to deliver this message ; it vvas a peer, an hereditary law-giver, who was charged with this noble mission, and who ac tually had the manliness to deliver the deli cate message to the wife and mother from his own lips. 58, The princess, however, very prudently requested to have her husband's wishes stated in writing ; but she at once told the bearer ofthe message, that though she must, of course, submit to the arrangement that the prince might resolve on, she desired it might be clearly understood that any such arrangement, if once made should be -final, and that under no circumstances he IL] GEORGE IV. should retain the right to alter it, Tliis answer produced the written proposal, which must be preserved here in the prince's own words. Shameful words to be by any man addressed to any woman. What must they be then when ad dressed by a husband to a wife, and to a wife, too, with an only child in her arms, and that child only three months old ! The man over comes the historian here, and makes him, for the honour of his sex and country, recoil at the thought of putting the words upon record. But not only is this demanded by truth and justice ; it is necessary to a clear understanding of the most important transactions of the regency and the reign of this king, Windsor Castle, April 30, 179(7. Madam, As Lord Cholmondeley informs me tliat you -wish I would define, io wiiting, lhe terms upon which we are to live, I shall endeavour to explain myself upon tbat head, with os much clearness and with as much propriety as the nature of the Buhject will admit. Our inclinations are not in our power, nor should either of us be held answerable to the other, because nature has not made us suitable to each other, Tran. quil and comfortable society is however in our power; let our intercourse tljerefore be restricted to that, and I will dis tinctly subscribe to the condition which you required through Lady Cholmondeley, that even in the event of any accident happening to my daughter, which I trust Providence in its mercy will avert, I shall not infringe the terms ofthe restric tion, by proposing at any period, a connexion of a more par ticular nature, I shall now finally close this disagreeable HISTORY OF [Chap. correspondence, trusting that as we have completely explained ourselves to each other, the rest of our lives will be passed ia uninterrupted tranquilUty, I am. Madam, With great truth. Very sincerely yours, (Signed) GEORGE P. 59. It is unnecessary to remark on the rudeness and grossness of this letter ; they are too obvious not to fill every one with disgust ; but, taking subsequent events into view, it is curious that the writer, even at so early a period, should have anticipated the possibility of some accident hap pening to the infant daughter ! His pious re liance on the mercy of Providence to spare the life of his child, while he was casting oflf the mother to whose breast that child was clinging, does, perhaps, surpass any-thing of the kind ever heard of before. To this letter the princess sent an answer, in French, on the sixth of May, in the follovving words : L'ateu de votre conversation avec Lord Cholmondeley, ne m'^tonne, ni ne m'ofifense. C'^toit me confirmer ce que vous m'avez tacitement insinui depuis une annie. Mais il y aurout apres cela, un manque de delicatesse ou, pour mieux dire, une bassesse indigne de me plaindre des conditions, que vous imposez a vous m^me. Je ne vous aurois point fait de reponse, si votre lettre n'^toit conf ue de maniere a faire douter, si cet arrangement vient de vous, ou de moi; et vous syavez que vous m'an. noncez I'honneur. La lettre que vous m'annoncez comme IL] GEORGE IV. la derniere, m'oblige de communiquer auRoy, comme a moa Souverain et a mon Pere, votre aveu et ma reponse. Vous trouverez fi incluse la copie de celle que j'ecris au Roy. Je TOUS en previens pour ne pas m'attirer de votre part la moin dre reproche de duplicite. Comme je n'ai, dans ce moment, d^ autre protecteur que Sa Majesty, je m'en rapporte unique- ment a lui. Et si ma conduite merite son approbation, je serai, du moins en partie, consolee. Du reste, je conserve toute la reconnoissance possible de ce que je me trouve par votre moyen, comme Princesse de Galles, dans une situition a pouvoir me livrer sans contrainte, a une vertu chere a mon coeur, je vieux dire la bienfaisance. Ce sera pour moi un devoir d'agir de plus par un autre motif, Sfavoir celui de donner 1' exemple de la patience, et de la resignation dans toutes sortes d'epveuves. Rendez moi lajus- tice de me croire, que je ne cesserai jamais de faire des voeux pour votre bonheur, et d'etre votre bieu devouee. (Signed) CAROLINE. Ce6deMay, 1796. TRANSLATION. The avowal of your conversation with Lord Cholmondeley neither surprises nor offends me. It merely confii-med what you have tacitly insinuated for this twelvemonth. Eut after this, it would be a want of delicacy, or rather an unworthy meanness in me, were I to complain of those conditions which you impose upon yourself. I should have retumed no answer to your letter, if it had not been conceived in terms to make it doubtful, whether this arrangement proceeds from you or from me, and you are aware that the credit of it belongs to you alone. The letter which you announce to me as the last, obliges me to communicate to the King, as to my Sovereign and my Father, both your avowal and my answer. You will find enclosed the copy of my letter to the King. I apprise you of it, that I may not incur the slightest reproach of duplicity from you. As I have at this moment no protector but His HISTORY OF [Chap. majesty, I refer myself solely to him upon this subject, and if roy conduct meets his approbation, I sliall be in £0me de gree at least consoled. I retain every sentiment of gratitude for the situation in which I find myself, as Princess of Wales, enabled by your means, to indulge in the free exercise of a virtue dear to my heart, I mean charity. It will be my duty likewise to act upon another motive, that of giving an example of patience and resignation under every trial. Do me the justi-je to believe that I shall never cease to pray for your happiness, and to be. Your much devoted CAROLINE. 6th of May, 1796. 60. In these documents we have the real foundation of not only all the inquietudes, the scandal, the shame, the mortification,and the just reproach, which this king had to endure for the rest of his life, and the laughing holiday, in and about Loudon, on the very day oi his funeral ; not only of these, for these would, comparatively, be an insignificant matter ; but the foundation also of mischievous appointments and measures innumerable ; the foundation, and the sole foun dation ofthe long-continued and disastrous power of Perceval, Eldon,^ Liverpool, Sidmouth, Castle reagh, and Canning; the cause, in short, ofthe waste of hundreds of millions of money, the cause of national disgrace in war, the cause of laws, the stain of which will never be eflfaced, and, finally, the real root of that mass of suffering on the part of the people of this once happy nation. IL] GEORGE IV. which suflfering, arrived at the utmost verge of endurance, now threatens the very existence of the state, now causes to totter to its base that famous fabric of government, which, for so many ages, was the pride of Englishmen, and the admi ration of the world. 61. This is ascribing great effects to an appa rently inadequate cause; but the sequel will prove the truth of what is here asserted. The " Wrath of Achilles," sung by Homer and Pope, was not to Greece, a more "direful spring of woes " than the conduct of this royal husband was to England. And what was his apology for that conduct ? "Our " inclinations are not in our power, nor should " either of us be ansvjerable to the other, because " nature has not made us suitable to each other." Shameful words ! Was this the language of the "first gentleman in England ?" And was it for this that this generous nation had loaded him with luxuries out of the fruit of its cares and toils 1 Was it for this that his enormous debts had been twice discharged; that 27,000/. had been given to defray the expenses ofhis marriage, 28,000/. for additional jewels and plate, and 26,000/. to beautify the matrimonial mansion; and was it for this that, after all his squanderings, the nation still gave him 138,000/. a year, and settled on his wife a jointure of 50,000/. a year ! Was this the return that he made for indulgence, kindness, and generosity, which, all the circum- HISTORY OF [Chap. stances considered, never was surpassed by the conduct of any nation in the world. The Pro digal Son, as described in that most beautiful of all beautiful writings, the parable in the Gospel of St, Luke, arose and said, " I will go to my " father, and say unto him. Father, I have sinned "against heaven and before thee, and am no " more worthy to be called thy son," But the father, hke the English nation, " while he was " yet a great way off, saw him, and ran, and fell " on his neck, and said unto his servants. Bring " forth the best robe and put it on him ; and put a " ring on his hand ; and bring hither the fatted " calf, and let us eat and be merry," How like the conduct of this kind and good father to that of the English nation towards this prodigal Prince of Wales ! If the parable had gone on to record that this prodigal afterwards became, though with experience to warn him, a greater prodigal than before, would it not also have recorded the punishment due to prodigality so incorrigible ? 62. It is impossible to put upon this letter of the prince, any other construction, than that it meaned to tell the princess, that he should no longer be be bound by his marriage-vow, and that he absolved her from hers ; in short, that he mean ed to live with what women he pleased, and that she might live with what men she pleased 1 Besides the scandal ; besides the shame brought upon the nation ; for, it must bear the .shame of II.] GEORGE IV. being under rulers thus acting; besides these, here was laid the pretty certain foundation of a dis puted succession; and even if this were never to take place (and we very narrowly escaped it) what Englishman must not have blushed at the thought of the prospect of being governed by a king, who had given to his wife and the mother of his child (who would naturally succeed him on the throne) a license like that expressed in this letter ? But, about the character or feelings of the nation, he seems, in this case at any rate, to have cared nothing. His ovvn mere animal pleasures appear to have been his only care. Yet, he was now thirty-four years of age, and within one year of that age, which the sober, cau tious and wise Americans have deemed, by their laws, an age suflScient for the man who is to be -the Chief Magistrate of their great Republic. 63. For the parties to live under the same roof, after this scandalous insult on the wife, was impossible. The Princess soon afterwards went to reside in a house at BLACKHE.vrn, in the parish of Greenwich, and on the side of the very beautiful Park there, which is at the distance of about five miles from St. James's Palace in Westminster. At this place, which has become memorable from the subsequent transactions connected with it, she resided in a sort of "hum ble retirement," as she afterwards described it, " banished, as it were, from her husband, aud history of [Chap. " almost estranged from the whole of the royal "family, having no means of having recourse, " either for society or advice." Besides which, she could write and speak English but very imper fectly ; and as, from the very first, from the day of her arrival in this country, the Queen and the Princesses showed her little or no countenance; the nobility, notwithstanding the character and conduct that that word ought to imply, studi ously shunned her the moment she was cast off by her husband. The people, always just when not deceived, felt for her as they ought, and upon all occasions that offered expressed their indig nation at the treatment she had received. Cruel husband was not and never will be a title to re spect in England. In no country is it, indeed, respected; but in England it is detested and ab horred. It was soon discovered that this un protected foreign lady was not visited by the Queen ; that she came into her presence only on state occasions ; and that, in short, she had, of the whole family, no friend but the old king, who frequently went alone to visit her. 64. This conduct in the female part ofthe royal family greatly offended the nation, and justly of fended it. What ! the people exclaimed, do they see their daughter and sister-in-law, and she their niece and cousin too, driven from her husband's roof with a baby three months old in her arms, of which baby they are the grandmother and the II.] GEORGE IV. aunts ; do they see this, and feel no compassion for the sufferer, though a stranger in the land, and though they know that she has thus been punish ed and degraded for no fault, and in violation of the most solemn vows ; do they see this, and by keeping aloof from, not only give her no support or consolation, but tacitly tell the world that there is some just cause for her banishment ! This conduct gave great offence to the English nation, who, with the exception of the aris tocracy, did itself everlasting honour by its con duct towards the persecuted lady; showed a love of "fair play," of that proneness to take part with the weak against the strong, which has ever been amongst its best characteristics. And the royal family have not failed to experience the natural effects of this feeling in the nation, whose regard for that family has never been what it vvas before the period now under consideration. 65. But, alas ! the sufferings of the unfortunate princess were not to end here; here they but made a mere beginning ; her banishment was the smallest part of what she was destined to endure. If, indeed, she had been permitted to enjoy that " tranquil and comfortable society," which the prince, in giving her her discharge, said was "within their power," she might, though injured and insulted, have led a life free from anxiety, particularly as she might with justice have discarded from her mind all regard for, and D history of [Chap. care about, him. But, to suffer her to lead this sort of life appears to have been very far from his thoughts ; for, as it was afterwards amply proved, she was no sooner in her state of banishment, than means were set to work to obtain against her such evidence as would, if established, justify the husband in demanding a divorce, 66. No steps were, however, openly taken, until the year 1 806 ; though the pretended (jrounds of those steps had, some of them, existed five years before. These steps were : 1. A COMMUNICATION to the King, by the Prince of Wales, of certain information that he had received relative to the conduct of his wife ; 2. A WARRANT of the king, authorising and commanding the lord chancellor, the secretary of state for the home department, the first lord of the treasury, and the lord chief justice of the court of King's Bench, to inquire into the truth of the allegations, and to report the result to the king. When we have these do cuments recorded, we shall have before us the true source of more cabal, intrigue, and mischief, than ought to exist in any nation in ten cen turies. The steps were the natural offspring of the cruel and insulting letter from the prince to his wife, on the 30th of April, 1796. As we shall by-and-by see, the plot was hatching during the whole of the ten years; and the reasons why it was attempted to be put in exe- II.] GEORGE IV. cution now, and not before, will be stated by- and-by, and vvill be found to be a matter of great importance, connected as those reasons were with political measures deeply affecting the interests of the country. THE WARRANT. GEORGE R, Whereas Our right trusty and well-beloved Councillor Thomas Lord Erskine, Our Chancellor, has this day laid before Us an Abstract of certain written Declarations touch ing the Conduct of Her Royal Highness Ihe Princess of Wales : We do hereby authorise, empower, and direct, the said Thomas Lord Erskine, Our Chancellor; Our right trusty and right well-beloved Consin and Councillor George John Earl Spencer, one of Our Principal Secretaries of Slate ; Our right trusty and well-beloved Councillor William Wyndham Lord Grenville, First Commissioner of Our Treasury : and Our right trusty and well-beloved CounciUor Edward Lord EUenborough, Our Chief Justice, to hold Pleas before Ourself, to inquire into the truth of the same, and to examine upon oath such Persons as they shall see fit, touching and con- ceming the same, and to report to Us the result of such Examinations. — Given at Our Castle of Windsor, on the twenty-ninth day of May, in the forty-sixth year of Our Reign. G. R, d2 history of [Chap. THE REPORT, May ii please your Majesty, Your majesty having been graciously pleased, by an in strument under your majesty's royal sign manual, a copy of which is annexed to this report, to " authorise, empower, and " direct us to inquire into the truth of certain written decla- " rations, touching the conduct of her royal highness the " Princess of Wales, an abstract of which had heen laid before " your majesty, and to examine upon oath such persons as we " should see fit, touching and concerning the same, and to *' report to your majesty the result of such examinations," we have, in dutiful obedience to your majesty's commands, pro ceeded to examine the several witnesses, the copies of whose depositions we have hereunto annexed ; and, in further exe cution of the said commands we now most respectfully submit to your majesty the report of these examinations as it has appeared to us : but we beg leave at the same time humbly to refer your majesty, for more complete information, to the examinations themselves, in order to correct any error of judgment into which we may have unintentionally fallen with respect to tury part of this business. On a reference to the above-mentioned declarations, as the necessary foundation of all our proceedings, we found that they consisted in certain statements, which had been laid before his royal highness the Prince of Wales, respecting the conduct of her royal highness the Princess. That these statements not only imputed to her royal highness great impropriety and indecency of behaviour, but expressly asserted, partly on the ground of certain alleged declarations from the princess's o-wn mouth, and partly on the personal observation of the informants, the following most important facts, viz. -. That her royal highness had been preg nant in the year 1802, in consequence of an illicit intercourse and thiit she had in the same year been secretly delivered of a male child, which child had ever since that period been brought up hy her royal highness, in her o-wn house, and under her immediate inspection. II.] GEORGE IV. These allegations thus made, had, as we found, heen fol lowed by declarations from other persons, who had not indeed spoken to the important facts of the pregnancy or delivery of her royal highness, but had related other particulars, in them selves extremely suspicious, and still more so when connected with the assertions already mentioned. In the painful situation in which his royal highness was placed by these communications, we learnt that his royal highness had adopted the only course which could, in our judgment, with propriety be foUowed. When infoi-mationa such as these had been thus confidently aUeged, and parti cularly detailed, and had been in some degiee supported by collateral evidence, applying to other points of the same nature (though going to a far less extent), one line only could be pursued. Every sentiment of duty to your majesty, and of concern for the public welfare, required that these particulars should not be withheld from your majesty, to v. hom more particularly belonged the cognizance of a matter of state so nearly touch ing the honour of your majesty's royal family, and, by possi bility, affecting the succession of your majesty's crown. Your majesty had been pleased, on your part, to view the subject in the same light. Considering it as a matter which, on every account, demanded the most immediate investigation, your majesty had thought fit to commit into our hands the duty of ascertaining, in the first place, what degree of credit was due to the informations, and thereby enabling' your majesty to decide what further conduct to adopt concerning them. On this review, therefore, of the matters thus aUeged, and ofthe course hitherto pursued upon them, we deemed it pro per, in the first place, to examine those persons in whose declarations the occasion for this inquiry had originated. Because if they, on being examined upon oath, had retracted or varied their assertions, aU necessity for further investiga tion might possibly have been precluded. We accordingly first examined on oath the principal in formants, Sir John Douglas, and Charlotte his wife; who both HISTORY OF [Chap. positively swore, the former to his having observed the fact of the pregnancy of her royal highness, and the latter to all the important particulars contained in her former declaration, and above referred to. Their examinations are annexed to this report, and are circurastantial and positive. The most material of those allegations, into the truth of which we had been directed to inquire, being thus far sup ported by the oaths of the parties from whom they had pro ceeded, we then felt it our duty to follow up the inquiry by the examination of such other persons as we judged best able to afford us information as to the facts in question. We thought it beyond all doubt that, in this course of in quiry, many particulars must be learnt which would be ne cessarily conclusive on the truth or falsehood of these de clarations. So many persons must have been witnesses to the appearances of an actually-existing pregnancy ; so many cir cumstances must have been attendant upon a delivery ; and difficulties so numerous and insurmountable must have been involved in any attempt to account for the infant in question, as the chUd of another woman, if it had been iu fact the child of the princess ; that we entertained a full and confident ex pectation of arriving at complete proof, either in the afiirmative or negative, on this part of the subject. This expectation was not disappointed. We are happy to declare to your majesty our perfect conviction that there is no foundation whatever for believing that the child now with !the princess is the cliild of her royal highness, or that she waa delivered of any child in the year 1802; nor has any-thing appeared to us which would warrant the belief that she was pregnant in that year, or at any other period within the com pass of our inquiries. The identity of the child now with the princess, its parent age, the place and the date of its birth, the time and the cir cumstances of its being first taken under her royal highness's protection, are aU established by such a concurrence both of positive and circumstantial evidence, as can, in our judgment, leave no question on this part of the subject. That child was II.] GEORGE IV. beyond all doubt, bom in the Brownlow-street hospital, on the llth of July, 3802, of the body of Sophia Austin, and was first brought to the princess's house in the montli of November following. Neither should we be more warranted in ex pressing any doubt respecting the alleged pregnancy of the princess, as stated in the original declarations — a fact so fully <:ontradicted, and- by so many witnesses, to whom, if true, it must in various ways have been known, that we cannot think it entitled to the smallest credit. The testimonies on these two points are contained in the annexed depositions and letters. We have not partially abstracted them in this report, lest by any unintentional omission we might weaken their effect; but we humbly offer to your majesty this our clear and unanimous judgment upon them, formed on full deliberation, and pronounced without hesitation ou the result ofthe whole inquiry. We do not, however, feel ourselves at liberty, much as we should wish it, to close our report here. Besides the allega tions of the pregnancy and delivery of the princess, those declarations, on the whole of which your majesty has been pleased to command us to inquire and report, contain,