'.-> ^.,^'WS ^1 •'--l-f?i?']-U*^' Jin*-" >•' . YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Gift of Martin S, Eicttelberger 1893 '¦&^'''-, &P.H5^iig-,F"S.A del ^frm]^ M©M^?'^ i^f'Li'iiviiij'-.':'^ wajt^f^ili^ * FllClfA FTCTUTiE BY ECIuUWT JIT TJiE COLLECTION AT STFAWt3TJFUiy Eil!., THE LETTERS OF HORACE WALPOLE, EARL OF ORFORD: INCLUDING NUMEROUS LETTERS NOW FIRST PUBLISHED FROM THE ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS. IN SIX VOLUMES. VOL. VL 1778 — 1797. LONDON: RICHARD BENTLEY, NEW BURLINGTON STREET; mitimtv i%t ©rtJinarj) to mtv iMajeistp. 1840. BvS'U 77 il % copy { The present Volume will be found to contain upwards of one hundred letters, introduced into no former edition of tlie Correspondence of Horace Walpole. The greater part of them were written between the years 1789 and 1797, and were addressed to the Miss Berrys, during their residence in Italy. They embrace most of the leading events of the first five years of the French Revolution ; and wherever the facts detailed in the letters have appeared to require elucidation or confirma tion, the Editor has generally had recourse to M. Thiers's useful " History " of that great event ; which has recently ap peared in an English dress, accompanied with notes and illus trations, drawn from the most authentic sources. While the last sheets of this volume were going to press, the Editor was favoured with a Letter from the Right Ho nourable Sir Charles Grey, relative to the share which he considers Mr. Walpole to have had in the composition and publication of the Letters of Junius. Albany Street, Regent's Park, October 28, 1840. ADVERTISEMENT TO THE LETTERS ADDRESSED TO THE MISS BERRYS. To the first edition of Lord Orford's works, which was published the year after he died, no memoir of his life was prefixed : his death was too recent, his life and character too well known, his works too popular, to require it. His political Memoirs, and the collections of his Letters which have been subsequently published, were edited by persons, who, though well qualified for their task in every other respect, have failed in their account of his private life, and their appreciation of his individual character, from the want of a personal acquaintance with their author. The life contained in Sir Walter Scott's Biogra phical Sketches of the English Novelists labours under the same disadvantages. He had never seen Lord Orford, nor even lived much with such of his intimates and contemporaries in society as survived him. Lord Dover, who has so admirably edited the first part of his correspondence with Sir Horace Mann, knew Lord Orford only by having been carried sometimes, when a boy, by his father Lord Clifden to Strawberry Hill. His editorial labours with these letters were the last occupation of his accomplished mind, and were pursued while his b 2 VIU ADVERTISEMENT. body was fast sinking under the complication of disease, which so soon after deprived society of one of its most distinguished members, the arts of an enlightened patron, and his intimates of an amiable and attaching friend. Of the meagreness and in sufficiency of his memoir of Lord Orford's life pre fixed to the letters, he was himself aware, and ex pressed to the author of these pages his inability then to improve it, and his regret that circum stances had deprived him, while it was yet time, of the assistance of those who could have furnished him with better materials. His account of the latter part of Lord Orford's life is deficient in details, and sometimes erroneous as to dates. He appears likewise to have been unacquainted with some of his writings, and the circumstances which led to and accompanied them. In the present publication these deficiencies are supplied from notes, in the hands of the writer, left by Lord Orford, of the dates of the principal events of his own life, and of the writing and publication of all his works. It is only to be regretted that his auto biography is so short, and so entirely confined to dates. In estimating the character of Lord Orford, and in the opinion which he gives of his talents. Lord Dover has evinced much candour and good taste. He praises with discrimination, and draws no un fair inferences from the peculiarities of a character with which he was not personally acquainted. It is by the Review of the Letters to Sir Horace Mann, that the severest condemnation has been ADVERTISEMENT. IX passed and the most ul^ust impressions given, not only of the genius and talents, but of the heart and character, of Lord Orford. The mistaken opinions of the eloquent and accomplished author of that review are to be traced chiefly to the same causes which defeated the intentions of the two first biogra phers. In his case, these causes were increased, not only by no acquaintance with his subject, but by still farther removal from the fashions, the social habits,, the little minute details, of the age to which Horace Walpole belongs, — an age so essentially different from the business, the movement, the important struggles, of that which claims the critic as one of its most distinguished ornaments. A conviction that these reasons led to his having drawn up, from the supposed evidence of Walpole's works alone, a character of their author so entirely and offensively unlike the original, has forced the pen into the feeble and failing hand of the writer of these pages, — has imposed the pious duty of at tempting to rescue, by incontrovertible facts ac quired in long intimacy, the memory of an old and beloved friend, from the giant grasp of an author and a critic from whose judgment, when delibe rately formed, few can hope to appeal with success. The candour, the good-nature of this critic, — the inexhaustible stores of his literary acquirements, which place him in the first rank of those most distinguished for historical knowledge and critical acumen, — will allow him, I feel sure, to forgive this appeal from his hasty and general opinion, to the judgment of his better informed mind, on the X ADVERTISEMENT. peculiarities of a character often remarkably dis similar from that of his works. Lord Dover has justly and forcibly remarked, " that what did the most honour both to the head " and the heart of Horace Walpole, was the friend- " ship Avhich he bore to Marshal Conway ; a man " who, according to all the accounts of him that " have come down to us, was so truly worthy of " inspiring such a degree of affection.^ " He then quotes the character given of him by the editor of Lord Orford's works in 1798. This character of Marshal Conway was a portrait drawn from the life, and, as it proceeded from the same pen which now traces these lines, has some right to be inserted here. " It is only those who have " had the opportunity of penetrating into the most " secret motives of his public conduct, and into " the inmost recesses of his private life, who can " do real justice to the unsullied purity of his cha- " racter ; — who saw and knew him in the evening of " his days, retired from the honorable activity of a " soldier and of a statesman, to the calm enjoy- " ments of private life ; happy in the resources of " his own mind, and in the cultivation of useful " science, in the bosom of domestic peace — un- " enriched by pensions or places — undistinguished " by titles or ribbons — unsophisticated by public " life, and unwearied by retirement." To this man. Lord Orford's attachment, from their boyish days at Eton school to the death of ' Sketch of the Life of Horace Walpole, by Lord Dover. See vol. i. p. 14. ADVERTISEMENT. XI Marshal Conway in 1795, is already a circum stance of sufficiently rare occurrence among men of the world. Could such a man, of whom the fore going lines are an unvarnished sketch — of whose character, simplicity was one of the distinguished ornaments — could such a man have endured the in timacy of such an individual as the reviewer de scribes Lord Orford to have been ? Could an in tercourse of uninterrupted friendship and undimin ished confidence have existed between them during a period of nearly sixty years, undisturbed by the business and bustle of middle life, so apt to cool, and often to terminate, youthful friendships ? Could such an intercourse ever have existed, with the sup posed selfish indifference, and artificial coldness and conceit of Lord Orford's character ? The last correspondence included in the present publication will, it is presumed, furnish no less convincing proof, that the warmth of his feelings, and his capacity for sincere affection, continued un- enfeebled by age. It is with this view, and this alone, that the correspondence alluded to is now, for the first time, given to the public. It can add nothing to the already established epistolary fame of Lord Orford, and the public can be as little interested in his sentiments for the two individuals addressed. But, in forming a just estimate of his character, the reader will hardly fail to observe, that those sentiments were entertained at a time of life when, for the most part, the heart is too little capable of expansion to open to new attachments. The whole tone of these letters must prove the XU ADVERTISEMENT. unimpaired warmth of his feelings, and form a striking contrast to the cold harshness of which he has been accused, in his intercourse with Madame du DefFand, at an earlier period of his life. This harshness, as was noticed by the editor of Madame du Deffand's letters, in the preface to that pub lication, proceeded solely from a dread of ridicule, which forraed a principal feature of Mr. Walpole's character, and which, carried, as in his case, to excess, must be called a principal weakness. " This " accounts for the ungracious language in which he " so often replies to the importunities of her anxious " affection ; a language so foreign to his heart, and " so contrary to his own habits in friendship." • Is this, then, the man who is supposed to be " the " most eccentric, the most artificial, the most fas- " tidious, the most capricious of mortals — his mind " a bundle of inconsistent whims and affectations " — his features covered with mask within mask, " which, when the outer disguise of obvious affecta- " tion was removed, you were still as far as ever " from seeing the real man." " Affectation is " the essence of the man. It pervades all his " thoughts, and all his expressions. If it were " taken away, nothing would be left.^ " He affected nothing ; he played no part ; he was what he appeared to be. Aware that he was ill qualified for politics, for public life, for parlia mentary business, or indeed for business of any sort, 1 See Preface to Madame du Deffand's Letters, p. xi ; and vol. v. p. 132 of this Collection. ^ See Edinburgh Review, vol. Iviii. p. 233. ADVERTISEMENT. xiii the whole tenour of his life was consistent with this opinion of himself. Had he attempted to effect what belongs only to characters of another stamp — had he endeavoured to take a lead in the House of Commons — had he sought for place, dig nity, or office — had he aimed at intrigue, or at tempted to be a tool for others — then, indeed, he might have deserved the appellation of artificial, eccentric, and capricious. From the retreat of his father, which happened the year after he entered parliament, the only real interest he took in politics was when their events happened immediately to concern the objects of his private friendships. He occupied himself with what really amused him. If he had affected any thing, it would certainly not have been a taste for the trifling occupations with which he is re proached. Of no person can it be less truly said, that " affectation was the essence of the man." What man, or even what woman, ever affected to be the frivolous being he is described ? When his critic says, that he had " the soul of a gen tleman usher," he was little aware that he only repeated what Lord Orford often said of him self — that from his knowledge of old ceremonials and etiquettes, he was sure that in a former state of existence, he must have been a gentleman-usher about the time of Elizabeth. In politics, he was what he professed to be, a Whig, in the sense which that denomination bore in his younger days, — never a Republican. In his old and enfeebled age, the horrors of the XlV ADVERTISEMENT. first French revolution made him a Tory ; while he always lamented, as one of the worst effects of its excesses, that they raust necessarily retard to a distant period the progress and establishment of civil liberty. But why are we to believe his con tempt for crowned heads should have prevented his writing a memoir of " Royal and Noble Authors ?" Their literary labours, when all brought together by himself, would not, it is believed, tend much to raise, or much to alter his opinion of them. In his letters from Paris, written in the years 1765, 1766, 1767, and 1771, it will be seen, that so far from being infinitely more occupied with " the fashions and gossip of Versailles and Marli than with a great moral revolution which was taking place in his sight," he was truly aware of the state of the public mind, and foresaw all that was coming on. Of Rousseau he has proved that he knew more, and that he judged him more accurately, than Mr. Hume, and many others who were then duped by his mad pride and disturbed understanding. Voltaire had convicted himself of the basest of vain lies in the intercourse he sought with Mr. Walpole. The details of this transaction, and the letters which passed at the time, are already print ed in the quarto edition of his works. In the short notes of his life left by himself, and from which all the dates in this notice are taken, it is thus mentioned : " Although Voltaire, with whom I had never " had the least acquaintance, had voluntarily writ- " ten to me first, and asked for my. book, he ADVERTISEMENT. XV " wrote a letter to the Duchesse de Choiseul, in " which, without saying a syllable of his having " written to me first, he told her I had officiously " sent him my works, and declared war with him " in defence ' de ce bouffon de Shakspeare,' whom in " his reply to me he pretended so much to admire. " The Duchesse sent me Voltaire's letter; which " gave me such a contempt for his disingenuity, " that I dropped all correspondence with him." When he spoke with contempt of d'Alembert, it was not of his abilities ; of which he never pre tended to judge. Professor Saunderson had long before, when he was a lad at Cambridge, assured him, that it would be robbing him to pretend teaching him mathematics, of which his mind was perfectly incapable, so that any comparison "of the intellectual powers of the two men" would indeed be as " exquisitely ridiculous" as the critic declares it. But Lord Orford, speaking of d'Alem bert, complains of the overweening importance which he, and all the men of letters of those days in France, attributed to their squabbles and disputes. The idleness to which an absolute government necessarily condemns nine-tenths of its subjects, sufficiently accounts for the exaggerated import ance given to and assumed by the French writers, even before they had become, in the language of the Reviewer, " the interpreters between Eng land and mankind :" he asserts, " that all the great " discoveries in physics, in metaphysics, in political " science, are ours ; but no foreign nation, except " France, has received them from us by direct com- xvi ADVERTISEMENT. " munication : isolated in our situation, isolated " by our manners, we found truth, but did not " impart it." ^ It may surely be asked, whether France will subscribe to this assertion of supe riority, in the whole range of science ? If she does, her character has undergone a greater change, than any she has yet experienced in the course of all her revolutions. Lord Orford is believed by his critic to have " sneered" at everybody. Sneering was not his way of showing dislike. He had very strong pre judices, sometimes adopted on very insufficient grounds, and he therefore often made great mis takes in the appreciation of character ; but when influenced by such impressions, he always expressed his opinions directly, and often too violently. The affections of his heart were bestowed on few ; for in early life they had never been cultivated, but they were singularly warm, pure, and constant; characterized not by the ardour of passion, but by the constant preoccupation of real affection. He had lost his mother, to whom he was fondly attach ed, early in life ; and with his father, a man of coarse feelings and boisterous manners, he had few sentiments in common. Always feeble in constitu tion, he was unequal to the sports of the field, and to the drinking which then accompanied them; so that during his father's retreat at Houghton, however much he respected his abilities and was devoted to his fame, he had little sympathy in his tastes, or pleasure in his society. To the friends 1 Edinburgh Review, vol. Iviii. p. 233. ADVERTISEMENT. xvii of his own selection his devotion was not confined to professions or words : on all occasions of diffi culty, of whatever nature, his active affection came forward in defence of their character, or assistance in their affairs. When his friend Conway, as second in command under Sir John Mordaunt, in the expedition to St. Maloes, partook in some degree of the public cen sure called forth by the failure of these repeated ill-judged attempts on the coasts of France, Wal pole's pen was immediately employed in rebutting the accusations of the popular pamphlet of the day on this subject, and establishing his friend's ex emption from any responsibility in the failure. When, on a more important occasion, Mr. Conway was not only dismissed from being Equerry to the King, George III, but from the command of his regiment, for his constitutional conduct and votes in the House of Commons, in the memorable affair of the legality of General Warrants for the seizure of persons and papers, Walpole iramediately step ped forward, not with cold coraraendations of his friend's upright and spirited conduct, but with all the confidence of long-tried affection, and all the security of noble minds incapable of misunderstanding each other, he insisted on being allowed to share in future his fortune with his friend, and thus more than repair the pecuniary loss he had incurred. Mr. Conway, in a letter to his brother Lord Hertford, of this period, says, " Horace Walpole has on this occasion shown that " warmth of friendship that you know him capable XVlU ADVERTISEMENT. " of SO strongly, that I want words to express my "sense of it;"* thus proving the justice he did to Walpole's sentiments and intentions. In the case of General Conway's near relation ship and intimacy from childhood, the cause in which his fortunes were suffering might have warmed a colder heart, and opened a closer hand, than Mr. Walpole's : but Madame du DefFand was a recent acquaintance, who had no claim on him, but the pleasure he received from her society, and his desire that her blind and helpless old age might not be deprived of any of the comforts and alleviations of which it was capable. When, by the financial arrangements of the French govern ment, under the unscrupulous administration of the Abbe Terray, the creditors of the state were con siderably reduced in income, Mr, Walpole, in the most earnest manner, begged to prevent the unplea santness of his old friend's exposing her necessities, and imploring aid from the minister of the day, by allowing him to make up the deficit in her revenue, as a loan, or in any manner that would be most satisfactory to her. The loss, after all, did not fall on that stock from which she derived her income, and the assistance was not accepted ; but Madame du Deffand's confidence in, and opinion of, the offer we see in her letters. During his after life, although no ostentatious contributor to public charities and schemes of im provement, the friends in whose opinion he knew he could confide, had always more difficulty to re press than to excite his liberality, 1 See vol. iv. p. 416. ADVERTISEMENT. XlX That he should have wished his friend Conway to be employed as commander on military expe ditions, which, as a soldier fond of his profession, he naturally coveted, although Mr, Walpole might disapprove of the policy of the minister in sending out such expeditions, surely implies neither dis guise, nor contradiction in his opinions. The dread which the reviewer supposes him to have had, lest he should lose caste as a gentleman, by ranking as a wit and an author, he was much too Jine a gentleman to have believed in the possi bility of feeling. He knew he had never studied since he left college ; he knew that he was not at all a learned man : but the reputation that he had ac quired by his wit and by his writings, not only among fine gentlemen but with society in general, made him nothing loath to cultivate every oppor tunity of increasing it. The account he gave of the idleness of his life to Sir Horace Mann, when he disclaims the title of " the learned gentleman," was literally true; and it is not easy to imagine any reason why a man at the age of forty-three, who admits that he is idle, and who renounces being either a learned man or a politician, should be " ashamed " of playing loo in good company till two or three o'clock in the morning, if he neither ruins himself nor others.* He wrote his letters as rapidly as his disabled fingers would allow him to form the characters of a remarkably legi ble hand. No rough draughts or sketches of fa miliar letters were found amongst his papers at 1 See Edinburgh Review, vol. Iviii. page 2.32. XX ADVERTISEMENT, Strawberry Hill : but he was in the habit of put ting down on the backs of letters or on slips of paper, a note of facts, of news, of witticisms, or of anything he wished not to forget, for the amuse ment of his correspondents. After reading " The Mysterious Mother," who will accede to the opinion, that his works are " des titute of every charm that is derived from eleva tion, or from tenderness, of sentiment ?"* But, with opinions as to the genius, the taste, or the talents of Lord Orford, this little notice has nothing to do. It aims solely at rescuing his indi vidual character from misconceptions. Of the means necessary for this purpose, its writer, by the " painful pre-eminence " of age, remains the sole depositary, and being so, has submitted to the task of repelling such misconceptions. It is done with the reluctance which must always be expe rienced in differing from, or calling in question, the opinions of a person, for whom is felt all the admiration and respect due to super-eminent abili-; ties, and all the grateful pride and affectionate re gard inspired by personal friendship. October 1840. See Edinburgh Review, vol. Iviii. page 237. TO THE EDITOR OF THE LETTERS OF HORACE WALPOLE, EARL OF ORFORD. Sir, I. Before your last volume is published, I am desirous of stating to you some of the considerations which, more than seventeen years ago, led me to the belief I still entertain, that Walpole had a principal share in the composition and publica tion of the Letters of Junius: though I think it likely that Mason, or some other friend, corrected the style, and gave pre cision and force to the most striking passages, 2. It was in 1823, whilst I was residing in India, that Lord Holland's edition of Walpole's Memoires of the Last Ten Years of the Reign of George the Second suggested to me this notion ; and it was shortly afterwards communicated to several of my friends. The edition of Junius which I had with me, was that of Mr. Woodfall the younger, in three volumes ; and I am not at present by any means satisfied that all the, letters which the Editor assigns to Junius were written by him : but in this hasty notice I must proceed upon the supposition that they were. 3. It will be remembered that the Memoires were composed by Walpole in secrecy, and that he left them in a sealed box, which, by his will, was forbidden to be opened until many years after his death. The letters from which the corresponding passages are given below are all published as Letters of Junius by Mr. Woodfall, and are of dates later than the time when Walpole wrote his Memoires ; but half a century earlier than the time when they were printed, JUNIUS. WALPOLE. I own, my lord, that yours is not As it is observed that timorous an uncommon character. Women, natures like those of women are and men like women, are timid, vin- generally cruel, Lord Mansfield dictive, and irresolute. — WoodfalVs might easily slide into rigour, &c.— Junius, vol. ii. p. 168. Walpole's Memoires, vol. ii. p. 175. Without openly supporting the The occasions of the times had person, you (Lord Mansfield) have called him (Lord Mansfield) off from VOL, VI, '^ XXll WALPOLE AND JUN [US. JUNIUS. done essential service to the cause ; and consoled yourself for the loss of a favourite family by reviving and establishing the maxims of their go vernment. — Vol ii. p. 162. You (Lord Mansfield) would fain be thought to take no share in go vernment, while in reality you are the main-spring of the machine. — Vol. ii. p. 179. You secretly engross the power, while you decline the title of minis ter.— Vol. ii. p. 179. In council he generally affects to take a moderate part. — ^Vol. ii. p. 354. At present there is something oracular in the delivery of my opi nion. I speak from a recess which no human curiosity can penetrate. — Vol. i. p. 31*. Our enemies treat us as the cun ning trader does the unskilful In dian. They magnify their generosity when they give us baubles of little proportionate value for ivory and gold. — Vol. ii. p. 359. If you deny him the cup, there will be no keeping him within the pale of the ministry. — Vol. ii. p. 219. Honour and justice must not be renounced, although a thousand modes of right and wrong were to occupy the degrees of morality be tween Zeno and Epicurus. The fundamental principles ofChristianity may still be preserved. — Vol. ii. p. 346. He (the Duke of Bedford) would not have betrayed such ignorance or such contempt of the constitution as openly to avow in a court of judica ture the purchase and sale of a bo rough. Note. — In an answer in Chancery in a suit against him to recover a large sum paid him by a person whom he had undertaken to return to par liament for one of his Grace's bo roughs. He was compelled to repay the money. — Vol. i. p. 576. WALPOLB. principles that favoured an arbitrary king — he still leaned towards an arbitrary government. — Vol. ii. p. 266. Pitt liked the dignity of des potism ; Lord Mansfield the reality. — Vol. ii. p. 274. He was timid himself, and always waving what he was always court ing.— Vol. ii. p. 336. The conduct was artful, new, and grand : secluded from all eyes, his (Lord Chatham's) orders were re ceived as oracles. — Vol. ii. p. 347. They made a legal purchase to all Eternity of empires and posterity, from a parcel of naked savages, for a handful of glass beads and baubles. — Vol. i. p. 343. Where I believe the clergy do not deny the laity the cup. — Letter to Montague. He took care to regulate his patron's warmth within the pale of his own advantage. — Memoires, Vol. ii. p. 197. Come over to the pale of loyalty. — Vol. i. p. 282. The modes of Christianity were exhausted. — Vol. ii. p. 282. To mark how much the modes of thinking change, and that funda mentals themselves can make no im pression. — Vol. ii. p. 285. Corruption prevailed in the House of Commons. Instances had been brought to our courts of judicature how much it prevailed in our elec tions. Note.— The Duke of Bedford had received 1500/. for electing Jeffery French at one of his boroughs in the West ; but he dying immediately, his heir sued the Duke for the money who paid it rather than let the cause be heard. WALPOLE AND JUNIUS. XXlll JUNIUS. The Princess Dowager made it her first care to inspire her son with hor ror against heresy, and with a respect for the church. His mother took more pains to form his belief than either his mo rals or his understanding. — Vol. iii. p. 408. That prince had strong natural parts, and used frequently to blush for his own ignorance and want of educa tion, which had been wilfully neg lected by his mother Mid her minion. » • * • » Our great Edward, too, at an early period, had sense enough to under stand the nature of the connection between his abandoned mother and the detested Mortimer. • » « « » When it was proposed to settle the present King's household as Prince of Wales, it is well known that the Earl of Bute was forced into it in direct contradiction to the late King's inclination. — Vol. ii. WALPOLE. From the death of the Prince the object of the Princess Dowager had been the government of her son ; and her attention had answered. She had taught him great devotion, and she had taken care that he should be taught nothing else. — Vol. i. p. 396. Martin spoke for the clause, and said, " The King could not have a separate interest from his people, the Princess might ; witness Queen Isabella and her minion Mortimer." — Vol.i. p. 118. Fox had an audience. The mon arch was sour, but endeavoured to keep his temper, yet made no conces sions ; no request to the retiring mi nister to stay. At last he let slip the true cause of his indignation: " You," said he, " have made me make that puppy Bute groom of the stole."-^Vol. ii. p. 92. Though too long to be cited in these hurried notes, there are several other passages in which the coincidence of sen timent and expression, and of the order in which the thoughts and arguments are ranged, is very remarkable: and the diffi culty of accounting otherwise for such coincidences between the Letters of Junius and the unpublished and secret Memoires of Walpole, first made me suspect that the two names might belong to one and the same person — Horace Walpole the younger. 4, Being led by this conjecture to examine the other works of Walpole, I found, in them also, many echoes, as it were, of the voice of Junius, which it is singular should not have been more observed. No one, I think, can collate the concluding portion of Walpole's letter to Lord Bute, of February 15, 1762, and the latter part of the eulogium of Junius on Lord Chatham, without being struck by the similarity of manner and tone; and by the identity of that feeling which, in both cases, prompts the writer, whilst he is elaborating compliments, to defend him self jealously against all suspicion of flattery or interested mo tives. c 2 XXIV WALPOLE AND JUNIUS. JUNIUS. I did not intend to make a public declaration of the respect I bear Lord Chatham. I well knew what unwor thy conclusions would be drawn from it. But I am called upon to deliver my opinion, and surely it is not in the little censure of Mr. Home to deter me from doing signal justice to a man who, I confess, has grown upon my esteem. As for the com mon, sordid views of avarice, or any purpose of vulgar ambition, I question whether the applause of Junius would be of service to Lord Chat ham. My vote will hardly recom mend him to an increase of his pen sion, or to a seat in the Cabinet. But if his ambition be upon a level with his understanding ; if he judges of what is truly honourable for him self with the same superior genius which animates and directs him to eloquence in debate, to wisdom in decision, even the pen of Junius shall contribute to reward him. Re corded honour shall gather round his monument, and thicken over him. It is a solid fabric, and will support the laurels that adorn it. I am not conversant in the language of pane gyric. These praises are extorted from me ; but they will wear well, for they have been dearly earned. — Vol. ii. p. 310. WALPOLE. I did not purpose to tempt aga,m the patience of mankind. But the case is very different with regard to my trouble. My whole fortune is from the bounty of the Crown and from the public : it would ill become me to spare any pains for the King's glory, or for the honour and satisfac tion of my country; and give me leave to add, my lord, it would be an ungrateful return for the distinction with which your lordship has con descended to honour me, if I withheld such trifling aid as mine, when it might in the least tend to adorn your lordship's administration. From me, my lord, permit me to say these are not words of course, or of compli ment, this is not the language of flattery : your lordship knows I have no views ; perhaps knows that, insig nificant as it is, my praise is never detached from my esteem : and when you have raised, as I trust you will, real monuments of glory, the most contemptible characters in the inscription dedicated by your coun try, may not be the testimony of, my lord, your lordship's most obedient humble servant. — Letters, vol. iv. p. 208, I have neither time nor space for going much farther into this part of the subject; but there is one circumstance which, in its application to the supposition that Francis was Junius, is too remarkable to be passed over. Sir Philip Francis sup plied Mr. Almon with reports of .two speeches of Lord Chat ham, in one of which there is this palssage, " The Americans had purchased their liberty at a dear rate, since they had quitted their native country and gone in search of freedom to a desert." Junius, about three weeks before, had said, « Tliey lefi their native land in search of freedom, and found it in a desert •" and it has been inferred from this, that the words in the speech were not Lord Chatham's, but the reporter's, and that Sir Philip Francis was Junius. But it happens that Walpole, in his Royal WALPOLE AND JUNIUS. XXV and Noble Authors, some years eariier than either the letter of Junius or the speech of Lord Chatham, had said of Lord Brooke, that he was on the point " of seeking liberty in the forests of America." 5. If we turn from a recollection of the words to a considera tion of the pecuharities of the style of Junius, I think it will be agreed that the most remarkable of all is that species of irony which consists in equivocal compliment. Walpole also excelled in this ; and prided himself upon doing so. Are we not justified in saying, that of all who, in the eighteenth cen tury, cast their thoughts on public occurrences into the form of letters, Junius and Walpole are the most distinguished? that the works of no other prose writer of their time exhibit a zest for political satire equal to that which is displayed in the Let ters of Junius, and in the Memoires and Political Letters of Walpole? and that the sarcasm of equivocal praise was the favourite weapon in the armoury of each, though it certainly appears to have been tempered, and sharpened, and polished with additional care for the hand of Junius ? When did Francis ever deal in compliment or in equivoque ? In his vituperation there was always more of fury than of malice : but Junius and Walpole were cruel. Madame du Deffand says to the latter, " Votre plume est de fer trempe dans le fiel." I have some times thought that clever old woman either knew or suspected him to be Junius, She uses in one place the unusual expression, " Votre ecrit de Junius :" and if Walpole was Junius, some of the most carefully composed letters, in 1769 and 1771 were written in Paris; where, indeed, it would seem that Junius, whoever he was, collected the materials for the accusation with which he threatened the Duke of Bedford, and which he evi dently knew to be untrue. 6. It has sometimes been said, that the Letters ' of Junius must have been written by a lawyer, and they were at one time attributed even to Mr. Dunning. The mistakes which I am about to notice, trifling as they may be, make it impossible that any lawyer should have been the author ; and it appears to me that not only is there a considerable resemblance in those mis takes which I adduce of Walpole's, but that the affectation in XXVI WALPOLE AND JUNIUS. both of employing legal terms with which they were not familiar, and of which they did not distinctly apprehend the meaning, is very remarkable. Junius thought De Lolme's Essay " deep, and talks of property which " savours of the reality:"^ he mis applies that trite expression of the courts, bona fide :^ misunder stands mortmain,* and supposes that an inquisitio post mortem was an inquiry how the deceased came by his death.^ Walpole talks of « the purparty of a wife's lands;" of " tenures against which, of all others, quo warrantos are sure to take place ;" of " the days of soccage," which he supposes to be obsolete ; and of a fera naturce. ' JUNIUS. WALPOLE. You say the facts on which you This circumstance is alleged reason are universally admitted: a against them as an incident con- gratis dictum which 1 flatly deny. — , trived to gain belief, as if they had Vol. iii. p. 143. been in danger of their lives. The argument is gratis dictum. — Works, vol. ii. p. 568. They are the trustees, not the Do you think we shall purchase owners of the estate. The fee sim- the fee simple of him for so many pie is in us. — Vol. i. p. 345. years .J" — Letters, vol. iii. p. 77. 7, Walpole's time of life, his station in society, means of in formation, and habits of writing much, and anonymously, and in concealment, all tally with the supposition of his being Junius, So do his places of residence, when that part of the subject ,is carefully examined. 8. It is an odd circumstance that Walpole, who makes remarks on everything, makes no remark on Junius. If he ever ex pressed an opinion of him in his letters to any of his numerous correspondents, those letters have been suppressed. There are fewer letters of his in the years during which Junius was writing than in any others, 9, Walpole's quarrel with the Duke and Duchess of Bedford, and the party whom he calls " the Bedford court," and Junius " the Bloomsbury gang," would account for the rancour of the letters of the latter to the Duke. 10. Walpole's dislike and opinion of the Duke of Grafton ' Woodfall's Junius, vol. i. p. 385. " Ibid. p. 312. ^ Ibid. p. 311. * Ibid, vol.ii.p. 131. « Ibid. vol. i. p,^454. WALPOLE AND JUNIUS. XXvii which is nowhere more remarkably expressed than in a letter pubhshed for the first time in your fifth volume, page 205, coupled with his friendship for the first Duchess of Grafton, fall in with the attacks of Junius on the Duke. 11. The Memoires of Walpole show an enmity to Lord Mansfield almost equal to that of Junius. 12. Turning from these to a person in a difierent station, we find, on the part of Walpole, (and, by-the-by, of Mason too,) a «ort of spite against Dr. Johnson; and in the works of Walpole, selected by himself for publication after his death,^ there is a high-wrought criticism and condemnation of the style of Johnson, which I cannot help believing to have been concocted in revenge of the well-known handling of Junius in Johnson's pamphlet on the Falkland Islands. " Let not in judicious admiration mistake the venom of the shaft for the vigour of the bow," is said by Johnson of Junius : and Walpole says of Johnson, that " he destroys more enemies by the weight of his shield, than with the point of his spear." 13. There is a host of small facts which might be adduced in support of what I have advanced. Any one who has leisure to examine the voluminous works of Walpole, and who can lend his mind to the inquiry, will find them crowd upon him. Let me mention one well-known occurrence, Junius says, in the postscript of a private note to Mr. Wood- fall, " Beware of David Garrick, He was sent to pump you, and went directly to Richmond to tell the King I should write no more," He then directed Woodfall to send the following note to Garrick, but not in the handwriting of Junius : — " I am very ex actly informed of your impertinent inquiries, and of the informa tion you so busily sent to Richmond, and with what triumph and exultation it was received. I knew every particular of it the next day. Now, mark me, vagabond ! Keep to your pantomimes, or be assured you shall hear of it. Meddle no more, thou busy informer ! It is in my power to make you curse the hour in which you dared to interfere with Junius."^ Mr. Woodfall remarks on this, that Garrick had received a ' Walpole's Works, vol. iv. p. 361. ' Junius, vol. i. p. 228. XXVIU WALPOLE AND JUNIUS. letter from Woodfall, (the editor of the newspaper in which the letters of Junius first appeared,) before the above note of Junius was sent to the printer, in which Garrick was told, in confidence, that there were some doubts whether Junius would continue to write much longer. Garrick flew with the intelligence to Mr. Remus, one of the pages to the King, who immediately conveyed it to his Majesty at that time residing at Richmond; and from the peculiar sources of information that were open to this extraordi nary writer, Junius was apprized of the whole transactioft on the ensuing morning, and wrote the above postscript, and the letter that follows it, in consequence. Now all that appears to Mr. Woodfall the younger, to be so wonderful in these circumstances is very easily explained, if we suppose Walpole to have been Junius, Strawberry Hill is very near Richmond Park, and Walpole had many acquaintances amongst those who were about the King ; whilst his friend Mrs, Clive, the actress, who lived in the adjoining house to his own, and her brother, Mr. Raftor, who frequently visited her, both belonged to Garrick's company. But I have extended this letter too far. My purpose was merely to invite your attention to a subject of some literary inte rest, which you have peculiar opportunities of examining ; and to enable you, if you should think fit, to draw to it the attention of the pubhc also. I am, Sir, Your obedient servant, Chas. Edw. Grey. 20, Albemarle Street, October 24, 1840. CONTENTS OF THE SIXTH VOLUME. [ Tlie Letters now first collected are marked N.] 1778. PAGE To the Hon. H. S. Conway, July 8. — Suggesting the propriety of pacification with America. Conduct of the Opposition. French neutrality. Partition of Poland . . . .1 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, July 12.— Projected Life of Mr. Baker. Dr. Kippis's " Biographia Britannica." Addison's character of Lord Somers. Whitgift and Abbot. Archbishop Markham. Calvin and Wesley. Popery and Presbyterianism. Churches and convents . . , . . .3 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, July 18.— Sailing of the Brest fleet. Political prospects . . . . .5 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, July 24. — Answer to the attack upon him prefixed to Chatterton's works. Gray's tomb, and Mason's epitaph . . . . . .7 To the same, Aug. 15. — Rowley's pretended poems. Walpole's Defence. Bishop Walpole's tomb. Baker's Life . . 8 To the Hon, H. S. Conway, Aug. 21. — Recollections of Sussex. Arundel Castle. Tombs of the Fitzalans. Knowle and Pens- hurst. Summer-hill. Leeds Castle. Goldsmiths' Company. Aquatic adventure . . . . .9 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Aug. 22. — Chatterton. Attacks on Wal pole in the Critical Review. Lord Hardwicke and the Carleton Papers. Literary squabbles.. The " Old English Baron." Lady Craven's " Sleep Walker.'' A literary adventure . ,10 To the same, Sept. 1. — Attack on him in the Critical Review. Ca bal in the Antiquarian Society. Their Saxon and Danish dis coveries, and Roman remains. Value of Mr. Cole's collections. Visit from Dr. Kippis . . . . .14 XXX CONTENTS. PAGE To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Sept. 18.—" Biographia Britannica." Life of the first Lord Barrington. Anecdote of the present peer . 17 To the same, Oct. 14. — Defence of Sir Robert Walpole against a charge of instigating George the Second to destroy the will of his father. Lord Chesterfield . . . .19 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Oct. 23. — Account of his pursuits . 21 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Oct. 26.— Completion of his Life of Mr. Baker . . . . . .22 To the samp^ Nov. 4. — Attack of the gout. Character of Mr. BakeT . . . . . .24 To Lady Browne, Nov. 5. — Reflections on the state of his health. Lady Blandford's obstinacy. [N.] . . .24 To the same, Dec. 18. — Admiral Keppel's trial. Lord Bute, Lord George Germaine. Lady Holderness. Lord and Lady Carmarthen. [N.] . . . . ,26 To the Earl of Buchan, Dec. 24. — Reply to inquiries after certain portraits. [N.] . . . . .28 To Edward Gibbon, Esq. — On the attacks upon his History of the Decline and FaU. [N.] . . . ,30 1779. To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Jan. 3.— Life of Mr. Baker. Damage done by the great tempest on New-year's morning. Death of Bishop Kidder. Tamworth Castle. Lord Ferrers's passion for ancestry . . . . . .32 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Jan. 9. — Mrs. Miller's follies at Batheaston. Ennui. His recent illness. Prospects of old age. Admiral Keppel's trial. Grecian republics. Anecdote of Sir Robert Walpole. Character of Sir William Meredith . 33 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Jan. 15.— Life of Mr. Baker. Pamphlet respecting Chatterton . . . _ o t To the same, Jan. 28. — Reasons for not printing his pamphlet concerning Chatterton. His Hieroglyphic Tales . . 35 To the same, Feb. 4.— Answer to Mr. Cole's objections to his Life of Mr. Baker . . . _ „_ To the same, Feb. 18. — His opinion of Hasted's History of Kent. Lord Ferrers and Tamworth Castle . oy To Sir David Dalryraple, March 12. — Thanks for his " Annals." Portrait of Duns Scotus. [N.] . . _ „„ To the Rev. Mr. Cole, March 28.— Swinburne's Travels in Spain. CONTENTS. XXXI PAGE The Alhambra. Character of the Moors. Cumberland's Masque of " Calypso." Design of a chimney-piece, by Holbein . 39 To Edward Gibbon, Esq. — Congratulations on his "Vindication" of his "History." [N.] . . , .41 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, April 12.— St. Peter's portrait. Richard the Third. Truth and Falsehood. Murder of Miss Ray by Mr. Hackman. Shades of madness. Solace in books and past ages 42 To the same, April 20. — Plates after designs by Rubens . 43 To the same, April 23. — Sale of the pictures at Houghton . 44 To Mrs. Abington. — Regrets at not being able to accept an in vitation. [N.] . . . . , .44 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, May 21.— History of the Abbey of Bee. Keate's " Sketches from Nature." Church of Reculver. Per son of Richard the Third . . . 45 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, May 22. — Attack on Jersey. War in America. Masquerades. Festino at Almack's. Lord Bristol's wonderful calf . . . . .46 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, June 2. — State of his health. Strictures on a volume of the Archaeologia. Pictures at Houghton . 47 To the Rev. Dr. Lort, June 4. — Painted shutters from the altar of St. Edmund's Bury . . . . .49 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, June 5. — Disturbances in Ireland. Spanish declaration of war. Treatment of America. Tickell's "Cassette Verte." Dr. Franklin. "Opposition Mornings." Story of Mrs. Ellis and her great O. . . .50 To the same, June 16. — Sailing of the Brest fleet. Probability of a war with Spain. Dispute with America. State of Ireland. Fete at the Pantheon . . , . ,53 To the Hon. George Hardinge, July 4. — Thanks for drawings of Grignan. Letters of Madame de S^vign^, and of her daughter. Character of Coulanges . . . . .56 To the Countess of Ailesbury, July 10. — Conjectures on the poli tical state of the country. Washington and Clinton. Difficulty of conquering America . . . . .57 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, July 12. — ^Value of the pictures at Hough ton . . . . . . ,59 To the same, Aug. 12. — Thanks for offer of painted glass. " His tory of Alien Priories " . . . . .61 To the Countess of Ailesbury, Aug. 13. — Situation of General Conway in Jersey. Constancy of Fortune. Folly of pursuing the war with America . . . ,61 XXXll CONTENTS. PAGE To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Sept. 13.— Alarms for the General's situation at Jersey. Battle between Byron and D'Estaing. Mrs. Darner. Eruption of Vesuvius . , .63 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Nov. 16. — Mr. Tyson's Journal. Old Gate at Whitehall. Nichols's "Alien Priories." Rudder's " History of Gloucestershire." Removal of old friends . • 64 To the same, Dec. 27. — Earl-bishops. Lord Bristol. Rudder's " History of Gloucestershire " . . . .66 1780. To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Jan. 5. — Congratulations on his providen tial escape. Count-bishops. Old painting found in Westmin ster-abbey. Tomb of Ann of Cleve. Reburial of the crown, robes, and sceptre of Edward the First. Sale of the Houghton pictures . . . . . .67 To Robert Jephson, Esq. Jan. 25. — His opinion of Mr. Jephson's " Count of Narbonne ;" and advice on casting the parts. [N.] . 69 To the same, Jan. 27. — Tragedy of the " Count of Narbonne." Warburton's panegyric on the " Castle of Otranto." Miss Aikin's " Fragment." " Old English Baron." [N.] . . 72 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Feb. 5.— New volume of the " Biographia Britannica." Characters of Dr. Birch, Dr. Blackwell, and Dr. John Brown. Dr. Kippis's threat. CardinaJ Beaton. Dr. Bentley. Mr. Hollis. Barry the painter , . .74 To the same, Feb. 27. — Rodney's victory. Home prospects , Party divisions. History of Leicester. Cite des Dames. Chris tina of Pisa . . . . .76 To the same, March 6.— Thanks for his portrait in glass. His tory of Leicester. Dean Milles and Mr. Masters. Pine apples. Charles the Second's gardener . . .78 To the same, March 13. — Atkyns's Gloucestershire. Hutchin son's Northumberland. Roman antiquities in England. Cor respondence of Hackman and Miss Ray, Sir Herbert Croft's " Love and Madness." Chatterton. " The Young Villain." Lord Chatham. Lady Craven's " Miniature Picture" . 79 To the same, March 30.— Projected reform of the House of Com mons. Annual parliaments . . _ go To the same. May 11.— Death of Mr. Tyson, and of his old friend George Montagu. His character . . _ .83 To the same. May 19. — Character of Joseph Spence . , 84 To the same. May 30.— Altar-doors from St. Edmondsbury. An- nibal Caracci and Shakspeare . . . .85 CONTENTS. XXXin PAGE To Mrs. Abington, June 11.— Invitation to Strawberry Hill. [N.] 86 To the Earl of Strafford, June 12. — Lord George Gordon and the Riots of London. Persecutions under the cloak of religion. Highway robberies. Ambition the most detestable of passions 87 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, June 15. — London riots. Black Wednes day. Lord George Gordon in the Tower. Electioneering riot ing in Cambridgeshire. Mr. Banks and the Otaheitans . 89 To the same, July 4. — Wishes his having written the Life of Baker to be kept a secret . . . .91 To the Earl of Strafford, Sept. 9.— Folly of election contests. Dissatisfaction in the fleefi . . . .91 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Sept. 27. — Electioneering agitations. Death of Madame du Deffand . . . . .93 To the same, Oct. 3. — " Life of Mr, Baker." Dr. James Brown . 94 To the same, Nov. 11. — Mr.Gough's "Topography." Introduc tion of ananas. Rose, the gardener of Charles the Second. Folly of antiquaries . , . . . 9.^ To the same, Nov. 24. — Mr. Gough's " Topography." Character of Mr. Pennant. Dean Milles. Judge Barrington. Dulness and folly of Grose's Dissertations. Rejoices in having done with the professions of author and printer, and determines to be comfort ably lazy . . . . . .97 To the same, Nov. 30. — In answer to a request for a copy of his Anecdotes for the University Library at Cambridge. Cha racter of Mr. Gough . . . . .98 To Sir David Dalrymple, Dec. 11. — Thanks for communications for his Anecdotes of Painters. Hogarth. Colonel Charteris. Archbishop Blackbourne and Mrs. Conwys. Poetry of Richard son and Hogarth. Lord Chesterfield's story of Jervas. Origin of Oil Painting. [N.] . . . . .100 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Dec. 19. — Friendship between Gray and Mason. Views of Strawberry HiU . . . 103 1781. To Sir David Dalrymple, Jan. 1. — ^Thanks for his favourable opinion of his father. His reasons for not writing his Life. Dr. Kippis and the "Biographia Britannica." Lord Barrington and the Hamburgh lottery. Character of King WiUiam. Folly of re-burying the crown and robes of Edward the First. Dr. Johnson's notions of sacrUege. [N.] . . . 104 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Jan. 3. — On the General's speech for XXXIV CONTENTS. PAGE quieting the troubles in America. Melancholy state of the country .,..•• 1*"^ To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Feb. 7.— Death of Lady Orford at Pisa . 109 To the same, Feb. 9.— Wolsey's negotiations. Value of Mr. Cole's manuscripts. Character of Mr. Pennant . • .110 To the Earl of Buchan, Feb. 10.— Thanks for being elected a mem ber of the Scotch Society of Antiquaries. [N.] . ,111 To Sir David Dalrymple, Feb. 10.— Sir WiUiam Windham and Sir Robert Walpole. Archibald Duke of ArgyU. Scotch Society of Antiquaries. Portrait of Lady Mary Douglas. [N.] . 112 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, March 2. — Reasons for becoming a member of the Scotch Antiquarian Society . . .116 To the same, March 5. — Inquiries after Lord Hardwicke's " Wal- poliana" . . , -, • .116 To the same, March 29. — Contradicting a report of Mr. Pennant's indisposition of mind . . . . .117 To the same, April 3. — Lord Hardwicke's " Walpoliana" . 117 To the same. May 4. — Character of Dr. Farmer. On his own rank as an author. Pennant's " Welsh Tour." Madame du Deffand's dog Tonton . . . . .118 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, May 6.— Relief of Gibraltar. Lord Cholmondeley at Brookes's. Winnings of Charles Fox and Fitzpatrick. India affairs. Arrival of Tonton . . 120 To the same. May 28. — Scotch thistles. French politics. Resigna tion of Necker. Proposals for a pacification with America. Charles Fox and the Marriage-biU. FoUy of retiring from the world ...... 122 To the same, June 3. — Projected French attack on Jersey. Siege of Gibraltar. " The Young William Pitt's " first display. Mr. Bankes. Theatricals. Consequences of Lord CornwaUis's vic tories ...... 125 To the Earl of Strafford, June 13. — Visit from Mr. Storer . 128 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, June 16. — Sir Richard Worseley's His tory of the Isle of Wight. Nichols's Life of Hogarth. Mies Strawberrianae." Miseries of having a house worth being seen 129 TotheEarlofCharlemont, July 1.— On Mr. Preston's poems. [N.] 132 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, July 7. — Orthodoxy and heterodoxy . 132 To the same, July 26. . . . . _ ^34 To the Earl of Strafford, Aug. 31. — DifiSculty of sending an enter taining letter. Mason's EngUsh Garden. Marriage of Lord Althorp . . . . . .135 vi CONTENTS. XXXV PAGE To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Sept. 16.— Their long and uninter rupted friendship. Madame du Deffand's papers. Henley bridge . . . . . .136 To John Nichols, Esq. Oct. 31.— Criticisms on his Life of Ho garth . . . . . .138 To Robert Jephson, Esq. Nov. 7. — On his tragedy of " The Count of Narbonne." [N.] .... 140 To the same, Nov. 10.— [N.] .... 143 To the same, Nov. 13. — [N.] .... 144 To the same, Nov. 18. — [N.] .... 145 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Nov. 18. — On Mr. Jephson's tragedy of" The Count of Narbonne" . . . .146 To Robert Jephson, Esq. Nov. 21. — Favourable reception of " The Count of Narbonne." [N.] . . . .147 To the Earl of Strafford, Nov. 27. — Surrender of the British forces at York Town. Gloomy forebodings of the consequences. Ge neral spirit of dissipation . . . .148 To the Earl of Buchan, Dec. 1. — British disgraces in America. Ancient portraits. [N.] , . . . .151 To Robert Jephson, Esq. Dec. 3. — On his expression of dissatis faction at some alterations in the scenes of his play. [N.] . 153 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Dec. 30. — The gout described. Etching of Browne WUlis. Character of Mr. Gough. Mr. George Steevens. Rowley and Chatterton controversy . , 153 1782. To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Jan. 27. — Interview with, and characters of, Mr. Gough and Mr. Steevens .... 157 To the same, Feb. 14. — Thanks for the loan of some manuscripts. Society of Antiquaries. Description of his regimen. His great nostrum ...... 158 To the same, Feb. IS. — Specimen of Mr. Gough's " Sepulchral Monuments." Antiquarian solemnities ridiculed. Count-bishop Hervey. Martin Sherlock the English traveller . . 160 To the Rev. WiUiam Mason. — New French translation of the Elder Pliny. Common jargon of poetiy . . . 163 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Feb. 22. — Rowley and Chatterton contro versy ...... 165 To the Hon. George Hardinge, March 8.— On the success of Ge neral Conway's motion for putting an end to the American war 166 XXXVl CONTENTS. PAGE To the Rev. Mr. Cole, March 9.— Character of Dr. Farmer. De claration of war by the Emperor against the Crescent. Am bition and interest under the mask of reUgion . • ^^"^ To the same, April 13. — His preference of English to Latin in scriptions. Mason's Archaeological Epistle to Dean MiUes. Melancholy death of Mr. Chamberlayne. Dr. Glynn • 168 To the same. May 24. — On his own iUness. The Chatterton con troversy . . . . . .171 To the same, June 1.— Bishop Newton's Life. Pratt's " Fair Circassian." Cumberland's " Anecdotes of Painters in Spain" 172 To John Nichols, Esq. June 19. — Dr. Henry Bland the trans lator of Cato's speech into Latin . . . .174 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, June 21. — Old age and solitude. Mari- vaux and Cr^biUon. MultipUoity of writers. Errors in Ni chols's " Select Poems " . . . .175 To the same, July 23. — Merits of Nichols's " Life of Bowyer." Dr. Mead. Carteret Webb. Great men. Dr. Birch's Cata logue of the Manuscripts in the British Museum . .176 To the Earl of Strafford, Aug. 16. — Inclemency of the season. Robberies. Comte de Grasse. Mrs. Clive's decUning health. Philosophy of deceiving one's self . . .177 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Aug. 20. — [N.] . . .179 To the Earl of Buchan, Sept. 15.— Dr. Birch's Catalogue. Mr. Tyrwhitt's book on the Rowleian controversy. [N.] . ,180 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Sept. 17.— On the General's being ap pointed Commander-in-chief. His new coke ovens . .180 To the Earl of Strafford, Oct. 3.— General EUiot's success at Gib raltar. Necessity of peace. Increase of highway robberies. Mr. Mason ..... ^ 182 To the Rev. Mr. Cole, Nov. 5.— On Mr. Cole's illness. His death ...... ig3 1783. To George Colman, Esq. May 10.— Thanks for his translation of Horace's Art of Poetry. [N.] . . _ ,ot To the Earl of Buchan, May 12.— Congratulations on the success of the Scotch Antiquarian Society. Roman remains. Biogra phy of Ulustrious men. Account of John Law. Papers in the Scotch CoUege at Paris, and paintings in the Castle of Au- bigny. [N.] . . . . . . jgy CONTENTS. XXXVll PAGE To the Hon. George Hardinge, May 17.— Sir Thomas Rumbold's BiU of pains and penalties . . . .189 To the Earl of Strafford, June 24. — Visits of the French to Eng land. Their Anglomanie. George Ellis. Beau DiUon. " An toinette." Mr. Mason. Fashionable Ufe . . . 190 To the same, Aug. 1. — Complains of his own inactivity and indif ference. Speculations on the peace. Lord Northesk. Shock of an earthquake . . . . .193 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Aug. 15. — Address of the Irish Vo lunteers. Political speculations. Mr. Fox . .196 To the same, Aug. 27. — [N.] . . . .197 To the Earl of Strafford, Sept. 12.— Visit to Astley's theatre. Sir WiUiam HamUton. Mr. Mason's new discoveries in painting. Pursuit of health . . . . .199 To the same, Oct. 11. — Disturbed state of Ireland. Parliamentary reform. Yorkshire Associations. Leaders of faction. Lord CarUsle's tragedy. Lord and Lady FitzwUUam . . 201 To Lady Browne, Oct. 19.— State of his health. [N.] . . 203 To Governor Pownall, Oct. 27. — Observations on a defence of Sir Robert Walpole by the Governor. Character of Hume. Sylla. Liberality of George the First and Second to his father . 204 To the same, Nov. 7. — The same subject . . . 208 To the Earl of Strafford, Nov. 10. — Situation of Ireland. Flowers of Billingsgate. Flood and Grattan. Meeting of the delegates. Difference between correcting abuses and removing land-marks. Character of Mr. Fox . . . . .209 To the same, Dec. 11. — ExceUence of letter- writing. India-bill. Air-balloons. Mrs. Siddons. Lord Thurlow. Flood and Courte- nay . . . . . . .211 1784. To the Hon. H. S. Conway, May 5. — Congratulations on the General's retirement from place and Parliament. Mr. Fox's election ...... 213 To Miss Hannah More, May 6.— Thanks for her poem, the " Bas Bleu." [N.] . . . . • .216 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, May 21.— Epitaph writing. Lord Melcombe's Diary. Cox's Travels . . .216 To the Countess of AUesbury, June 8.— Voltaire's Memoirs. Lord Melcombe's Diary. Severity of the weather . .218 VOL. VI. <^ XXXVIU CONTENTS. PAGE To the Hon. H. S. Conway, June 25.— Benefits of retirement from public Ufe. Local grievances. Highway robberies. The good things of life ...••• ^'^ To the same, June 30.— Inclemency of the season. Death of Lady Harrington. Lunardi's baUoon . • • 221 To the Earl of Strafford, Aug. 6.— Earthquakes. The Deluge. Uncertainty of human reasoning . . ¦ ¦ 222 To Mr. Dodsley, Aug. 8.— Declining Mr. Pinkerton's offer of a dedication to him of his Essay on Medals. [N.] . . 223 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Aug. 14.— Frequency of robberies in his neighbourhood. Disturbed state of Ireland . . 224 To John Pinkerton, Esq. Aug. 24. — Thanks for the perusal of his poems, and invitation to Strawberry HiU. [N.] . . 225 To the Earl of Strafford, Sept. 7. — Congratulations on the return of fine weather. Air-baUoons and highwaymen. Sir William Hamilton. Mrs. Walsingham. Mrs. Damer's " sleeping dogs " 225 To John Pinkerton, Esq. Sept. 27. — Criticisms on his comedy. [N.] 227 To the same, Oct. 6. — Further criticisms on his comedy. Re marks on English poetry, on poetry in general, and on the drama. [N.] ...... 229 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Oct. 15. — Speculations on the perfec tion of air-balloons ..... 232 To John Pinkerton, Esq. Oct. 27. — His own pubUcations and literary career. Remarks on Mr. Pinkerton's projected History of the Reign of George the Second. [N.] . . . 234 To Miss Hannah More, Nov. 13.— On the poems and conduct of Ann Yearsley, the Bristol mUkwoman. Danger of encouraging her poetical propensity. Fate of Stephen Duck . . 237 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Nov. 28. — Continental politics. Po etical epistle to Lady Lyttelton .... 240 1785. To Miss Hannah More, AprU 5. — In answer to an anonymous let ter from Miss More, ridicuUng the prevaUing adoption of French idioms into the English language .... 04,0 To John Pinkerton, Esq. June 22. — Strictures on " Heron's Let ters of Literature." Mr. Pinkerton's proposed amendment of the EngUsh language. Lady Mary Wortley Montague. Mr. Hume and Mr. Gray. [N.] • • . . 244 To the same, June 26. — Further criticism on Heron's " Letters," CONTENTS. XXXIX PAGE Definition and exemplification of grace. Remarks on AVaUer, MUton, Cowley, Boileau, Pope, and Madame de S^vign^. [N.] 247 To John Pinkerton, Esq. July 27. — Declining to print Greek ' authors at the Strawberry HUl press. [N.] . . / 252 To the same, Aug. 18. — Declines to print an edition of the Lifft of St. Ninian. [N.] . . . . 1 . 254 To the same, Sept. 17. — Advising him not to reply to the critiqiies of anonymous adversaries. [N.] . . ... 255 To George Colman, Esq. Sept. 19. — On sending him a copy of iTie Due de Nivernois' translation of his " Essay on Modern Gar dening." [N.] . . . . ',. 256 To the Earl of Buchan, Sept. 23. — Literary stores in the Vaticstv, and in the Scottish College at Paris. Mr. Herschell's dis> coveries. [N.] .....> 257 To John Pinkerton, Esq. Sept. 30. — Advice on his intended publi cation of Lives of the Scottish Saints. His opinion of Bishop Hoadley. Reflections on his own life. [N.] . . 259 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Oct. 6. — Jarvis's window at New CoUege. Blenheim. Beau Desert. Stowe. "The Charming Man." Boswell's " Tour to the Hebrides." . . 261 To the Earl of Charlemont, Nov. 23.— Order of St. Patrick. [N.] 263 To Lady Browne, Dec. 14. — Last Ulness and death of Kitty Clive. Lord John Russell's marriage. [N.] . . 264 1786. To Miss Hannah More, Feb. 9.— On her poem of " Florio," dedi cated to him ...... 266 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, June 18. — Account of his visit to the Princess Amelia at Gunnersbury. — Stanzas addressed to the Princess. Her answer. Purchase of the Jupiter Serapis and Julio Clovio . . . . . .267 To Richard Gough, Esq. June 21. — Thanks for the present of his " Sepulchral Monuments." The Due de Nivernois' translation of his " Essay on Gardening." .... 269 To the Earl of Strafford, Aug. 29.— The new bridge at Henley. Mrs. Damer's colossal masks. Visit from Count Oginski. Out- pensioners of Bedlam. Lord George Gordon. Archbishop Chicheley and Henry the Fifth . . . .271 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Oct. 29.— Two Charades, by Colonel Fitzpatrick. Precocity of Robert Stewart, afterwards Marquis of Londonderry ..... 273 d 2 xl CONTENTS. PAGE To the Right Hon. Lady Craven, Nov. 27. — Apologies for not having written, and thanks for a drawing of the Castle of Qtranto . . • • • .274 1787. To Miss*Hannah More, Jan. 1.— With a present of "Christine de Pise.'-j Her "Citg des Dames." Mrs. Yearsley . . 276 To thejjRight Hon. Lady Craven, Jan. 2— On her ladyship's traveK Sir John Mandeville. Lady Mary Wortley. Peter the Lermit ..... • 277 To Mitjs Hannah More, Feb. 23.— Christina's " Life of Charles the Jifth" . . . . . .279 To til Rev. Henry Zouch, March 13.— Proposing to return the letters he had received from him. [N.] . • ¦ 280 To Miss Hannah More, June 15.— The Irish character. Miss Burney. [N.] . . . . . - 280 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, June 17. — Expected visit from the Princess Lubomirski. " The Way to keep Him '' . . 282 To the Earl of Strafford, July 28.— St. Swithin. The Duke of Queensberry's dinner to the Princesse de LambaUe. Mrs. French's marble pavement. Lord Dudley's obelisk. Miss Boyle's carvings ...... 283 To Miss Hannah More, Oct. 14. — Ingratitude of Anne Yearsley to her. Mrs. Vesey. Dr. Johnson's Letters. Bruce's Travels. Gibbon's History. Figaro .... 285 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Nov. 11. — On the smaU Druidical temple presented by the States of Jersey to the General. Stone- henge ...... 288 1788. To Thomas Barrett, Esq. June 5.— Gibbon's " DecUne and Fall." Sheridan's speech against Mr. Hastings . . . 289 To the Earl of Strafford, June 17. — General Conway's comedy of " False Appearances." Sheridan's speech against Mr. Hastings 291 To Miss Hannah More, July 4. — Newspaper reading. General Conway's play • - . . . 293 To the same, July 12. — On his own writings. Authorship after seventy. Voltaire at eighty-four. Fate of his last tragedy. Mrs. Piozzi. Pipings of Miss Seward and Mr. Hayley . . 295 To the Earl of Strafford, Aug. 2. — On a reported discovery of new CONTENTS. xli PAGE letters of Madame de S^vigne. Letters of the Duchess of Or leans. Druidical temple from Jersey . . 297 To John Pinkerton, Esq. Aug. 14.— Criticism on his Ode for the Scottish Revolution Club. [N.] . . . 299 To Miss Hannah More, Aug. 17. — Rumoured discovery of new let ters of Madame de S^vign^. Library of Greek and Latin au thors at Naples. [N.] ..... 300 To the Earl of Strafford, Sept. 12. — Account of the Druidical tem ple at Park -place. The Duchess of Kingston's wiU . . 301 To Miss Hannah More, Sept. 22. — Ingratitude of Mrs. Yearsley. Education of the Great. Walpoliana. Virtuous intentions. Enthusiasts and quack-doctors .... 303 To the Right Hon. Lady Craven, Dec. 11. — Wisdom of retiring from the world in time. Voltaire. Lord Chatham. Mr. Anstey. King of Prussia's Memoirs. Poverty of the French language, as far as regards verse and pieces of eloquence. [N.] . 307 1789. To the Miss Berrys, Feb. 2. — Acceptance of an invitation. Ex pressions of delight on being in their society. [N.] . . 309 To the same, March 20. — Madame de la Motte's M^moire Justifi- catif. General iUumination for the King's recovery. Hairs of Edward the Fourth's head. [N.] . ' . . .310 To Miss Hannah More, April 22. — Darwin's Botanic Garden. Loves of the Plants. Success of General Conway's comedy. [N.] 311 To the Miss Berrys, April 28. — Darwin's Botanic Garden. His poetry characterized. [N.] .... 313 To the same, June 23. — Destruction of the Opera-house by fire. The nation tired of Operas. "¦ The room after." Mr. Batt and the Abb6 NichoUs. [N.] . . . .314 To Miss Hannah More, June 23.— On her poem of Bishop Bonner's Ghost. Offers to print it at Strawberry HiU. Bruce's Tra vels. [N.] . . . . . -316 To Miss Berry, June 30.— Arabian Nights. Bishop Atterbury. Sinbad the Sailor versus .(Eneas. Mrs. Piozzi's Travels. King's CoUege Chapel. Effects of criticism and comparison. Pageantry of popery. [N.] ..... 319 To Miss Hannah More, July 2. — Thanks for permission to print " Bishop Bonner's Ghost." Account of his fall. Gratitude to Providence for his lot .... 321 To Miss Berry, July 9. — Recovery from his faU. Present state of xlii CONTENTS. PAGE France. Tumults at VersaiUes on the reported resignation of Necker. Marshal Broglio appointed commander-in-chief. Camp round Paris. Mutinous disposition of the army. Vol taire's correspondence. His letters to La Chalotais. [N.] 323 To Miss Hannah More, July 10.—" Bishop Bonner's Ghost" . 326 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, July 15.— Dismissal of Necker. Paris in an uproar. Storming and destruction of the BastiUe. Specu lation on the probable results. The Duke of Orleans and Mira- beau ...... 327 To Miss Hannah More, July 20. — Result of her " double treach ery.'' A visit from Bishop Porteus. The visit returned . 329 To Miss Berry, July 29. — ^Anarchy in Paris. Account of La Cha lotais. Treachery of Calonne. Character of the Due de Vril- Uere. St. Swithin's day. Predicts the faU of Necker. [N.] . 331 To John Pinkerton, Esq. July 31. — Remarks on his " Inquiry into the early History of Scotland." [N.] . . .335 To Miss Hannah More, Aug. 9. — On sending her copies of " Bon ner's Ghost." Complains of the cold complimentality of her let ters. [N.] . . . . . .336 To John Pinkerton, Esq. Aug. 14. — Confesses his want of taste for the ancient histories of nations. Remarks on the different modes of treating antiquities. [N.] .... 338 To the same, Aug. 19. — Compliments him on his strong and manly understanding. Account of his own studies. [N.] . . 340 To Richard Gough, Esq. Aug. 24. — Strictures on the injuries done to SaUsbury cathedral by the recent alterations . .341 To the Miss Berrys, Aug. 27. — Illness of the Countess of Dysart. Richmond and Hampton-Court gossip. [N.] . . 342 To the same, Sept. 4. — On their decUning a visit to Wentworth House. The Duke of Clarence at Richmond. Miss Farren's Beatrice. Account of Lady Luxborough. Wentworth Castle described. Violences in France. Destruction of cha.teaus in Burgundy. Assemblage of deserters round Paris. Patience of Lady Dysart under her sufferings. MademoiseUe d'Eon in pet ticoats. [N.] . . . . . _ 344 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Sept. 5.— Thanks to him for a poem. Death of Lady Dysart. Terrible situation of Paris. Predicts that the kingdom wiU become a theatre of civil wars . . 343 To Miss Hannah More, Sept. — Congratulation on the demo lition of the functions of the BastiUe. The Etats a mob of kings. Time the composer of a good constitution. Negro slavery. Suggests the possibUity of relieving slaves by machine CONTENTS. xliii PAGE work. UtUity of starting new game to invention. Barrett's History of Bristol. The Biographia Brit.-innica and Chatterton . 349 To Miss Hannah More, Nov. 4.— Death of Lady Dysart and Lord Waldegrave. Mrs. Yearsley's Earl Goodwin. Death of Mr. Barrett. Succedaneum for negro labour. Suggests the pro priety of Mr. Wilberforce's starting the aboUtion of slavery to the Etats. Character of the Etats . . , 353 1790. To Miss Hannah More, Feb. 20. — With his contribution to a cha ritable subscription ..... 356 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, June 25.— Charles Fox and the West minster gridiron. PuerUe pedantry of the French Etats. De struction of the statues of Louis Quatorze. Bruce's Travels. [N.] . . . . . .357 To the Earl of Strafford, June 26. — Reflections on the state of France. Consciences of tyrants. Luther and Calvin. Fate of projectors ...... 359 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, July i; — Bruce's Travels. French barbarity and folly. Grand Federation in the Champ de Mars. RationaUty of the Americans. Franklin and Washington. A great man wanted in France. Return of Necker. His insig nificance. [N.] ..... 360 To Miss Berry, July 3. — His alarm at their design of visiting Italy. Atrocities of the French Etats. Good-humoured speech of Marie Antoinette. Winchester Cathedral. Netley Abbey. Visit from the Duchess of Marlborough. [N.] . . 362 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Aug. 9. — Peace with Spain. Miss Gunning's reported match with Lord Blandford . . 364 To the Earl of Strafford, Aug. 12. — Lord Barrymore's exhibitions at the Richmond theatre. Reflections on the progi-ess of the French Revolution ..... 365 To Sir David Dalrymple, Sept. 21. — Pictures at Burleigh. Shak speare GaUery. Macklin's GaUery . . • 367 To the Miss Berrys, Oct. 10.— On their departure for Italy. Re grets at the loss of their society. [N.] . . . 369 To the same, Oct. 31.— Burke's " Reflections." Calonne's "Etat de la France." [N.] . . • • .371 To the same, Nov. 8.— Pacification with Spain and Brabant. Earl Stanhope and the Revolution Club. Mr. Burke's " Reflections Xliv CONTENTS. PAGE on the French Revolution" characterized. Visit from the Prince of Furstemberg. [N.] . . . • 372 To Miss Berry, Nov. 11. — Mrs. Damer's departure for Lisbon. Effects of Burke's pamphlet on Dr. Price. Mr. Merry's " Laurel of Liberty." The DeUa Crusca school of poetry described. [N.] . . . . -375 To the Miss Berrys, Nov. 18. — Character of the Bishop of Arras. Dr. Price's talons drawn by Mr. Burke. Revolution Club ex ploded. [N.] . . . . . .376 To the same, Nov. 27. — Anxiety for a letter from Florence. [N.] 380 To Miss Agnes Berry, Nov. 29. — Thanks for her letter. Cor- reggio. Guercino, a German edition of Guido. Lord Stan hope's speech against Calonne's book. Dr. Price's answer to Burke. Reasons for creating Mr. GrenviUe a peer. Richmond arrivals. Duke of Clarence. Mrs. Fitzherbert. Duke of Queensbury. Madame Grifoni. Works of Massaccio. Fra Bartolomeo. Benvenuto CelUni's Perseus. [N.] . . 380 To the Miss Berrys, Dec. 20.— Character of Mr. Burke's " Re flections." Mrs. Macaulay's reply to it. [N.] , . 383 1791. To Miss Berry, Jan. 22.— Recovery from a severe iUness. Death of Mrs. French. IUness of George Selwyn. [N.] . . 384 To the Miss Berrys, Jan. 29. — Effects of his late iUness. Picture of himself. Death and character of George Selwyn. Mademoi seUe Fagniani. Story of Miss Vernon and Martindale. The Gunninghiad. Visit from Mr. Batt. Overthrow of the French monarchy. The Duchess of Gordon and Mr. Dundas. [N.] . 386 To Miss Berry, Feb. 4.— Regrets at their absence, and anxiety for their return. Destructive tempest. The rival Opera- houses. Taylor's pamphlet against the Lord Chamberlain. [N.] 389 To the same, Feb. 12. — His anxiety for their return, but resolu tion not to derange their plans of economy. Comte de Coigny. InstabUity of the present government of France. Home Tooke's Ubel on the House of Commons. Christening of Miss Boycot [N-] ; 392 To Miss Agnes Berry, Feb. 13.— Narrative of the history of a marriage supposed to have been likely to take place between Miss Gunning and the Marquis of Blandford. [N.] . 394 To the Earl of Charlemont, Feb. 17. — On a surreptitious edition of The Mysterious Mother, pubUshed at Dublin. [N.] . 397 CONTENTS. xlv , PAGE To Miss Agnes Berry, Feb. 18. — CodicU to GunnUda's story. Opening of the Pantheon. Dieu et mon Droit versus Ich Dien. [N.] ...... 399 To the Miss Berrys, Feb. 26. — More of the Gunnings. Arrival of Madame du Barry to recover her jewels. The King of France's aunts stopped from leaving France. Majesty of the mob. The Monster. Gibbon's account of Necker in retirement ; and opi nions of Burke's Reflections. Madame du Barry and the Lord Mayor. Recovery of her jewels. Jerningham's poetry. [N.] . 402 To the same, March 5. — London unknown to Londoners. " Who is Sir Robert Walpole .'' " Destruction of the Albion mUls. Au tomaton snuff-box. [N.] .... 407 To Miss Berry, March 19. — Mrs. Gunning's letter to the Duke of Argyle. [N.] . . . . . .408 To the Miss Berrys, March 27. — King's message on the situation of Europe. Blusterings of the Autocratrix. Bounces and huffs of Prussia. Royal reconciliation. Taylor and the Lord Cham berlain. Prosecution of the Gunnings. GunnUda's letter to Lord Blandford. [N.] . . . . .411 To Miss Berry, April 3. — On her fall down a bank near Pisa. Kemble and Mrs. Siddons. Mrs. Damer's reception at Elvas. Death of Dr. Price. Outrageous violence of the National Assem bly. Paine's answer to Burke. [N.] . . . 414 To the same, April 15. — Lady Diana Beauclerc's designs for Dry- den's Fables. War with Russia. Madame du Barry dining with the Prince of Wales. Increased population of London. Story of the young woman at St. Helena. A party at Mrs. Bul- ler's described. [N.] . . . . .416 To Miss Berry, April 23. — Resignation of the Duke of Leeds. Progress of the repairs at Cliveden. The abolition of the slave- trade rejected. Captain Bowen's pamphlet against Gunnilda. Hannah More and the Gretna Green runaway. Lord Chol- mondeley's marriage. Indian victory. [N.] . . 420 To the same. May 12. — Congratulations on her recovery. Earnest wish to put them in possession of Cliveden during his life. Un happy quarrel between Mr. Burke and Mr. Fox. Mrs. Damer's arrival from Spain. [N.] .... 423 To the same. May 19. — Thanks for her punctuaUty in writing. Advantages of resources in one's self. Internal armour more ne cessary to females than weapons to men. Duchesse de Brissac. Due de Nivernois. Hastings's impeachment. The Countess of Albany in London. Her presentation at court. Her visit to the Pantheon. [N.] . . ¦ • -427 xlvi CONTENTS. PAGE To Miss Berry, May 26.— The Duchess of Gordon's journal of a day. Arrival of Sir WiUiam Hamilton with the Nymph of the Atti tudes. Strictures on BosweU's Life of Dr. Johnson. John son's abuse of Gray. Burke's " Letter to a Member of the Na tional Assembly." His character of Rousseau. Lodge's " lUus- trations of British History" panegyrieised. Lord Mount- Edgcumbe's bon-mot on M. d'Eon. [N.] . . . 430 To the Miss Berrys, June 2. — "This is the Note that nobody wrote." Interview with, and description of, Madame d' Albany. [N.] . . . . . . .436 To the same, June 8. — Frequency of highway robberies. The birth day. Madame d'Albany. Mrs. Fitzherbert. Mrs. Cosway. Lally de ToUendal's tragedy. French politics. Rage for buUd ing in London. Visit to Dulwich CoUege. [N.] . . 437 To the same, June 14. — Mrs. Hobart's rural breakfast. Dr. Beattie. Malone's Shakspeare. [N.] .... 441 To Miss Berry, June 23. — Madame du Barry at Mrs. Hobart's breakfast. Dr. Robertson's " Disquisition." French anarchy. Madame d'Albany at the House of Lords. [N.] . , 444 To the same, July 12. — Calonne in London. Attack of the rheu matism. [N.] ...... 447 To the Miss Berrys, July 26. — Tom Paine in England. Crown and Anchor celebration of the French Revolution. Birmingham riots. Flight of the King of France to, and return from, Va- rennes. Marriage of the Duke of York. Catherine of Russia. Bust of Mr. Fox. [N.] . . . . .44,8 To Miss Berry, Aug. 17.— Spirit of democracy in Switzerland. Peace with Russia. M. de Bouill^'s bravado. Sir WiUiam Hamilton's pantomime wife. Antique statues. [N.] . . 451 To the Miss Berrys, Aug. 23.— Miss Harte and her attitudes. Conversation with Madame du Barry. Account of a boat-race. The soirdisante Margravine in England. [N.] . 453 To the same, Sept. 11. — Lord Blandford's marriage. Sir W. Hamil ton married to his GaUery of Statues. Successes in India. [N.] 455 To the same, Sept. 16.— Mrs. Jordan. Miss Brunton's marriage. Lord Buchan's jubUee for Thomson. Character of the " Sea sons." Danger of returning to England through France. [N.l 456 To the same, Sept. 25. — Valombroso. Ionian antiquities. Egyp tian pyramids. Mr. Gilpin and Richmond HUl. [N.l . 450 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Sept. 27.— The French emigrants at Richmond. Progress of the French Revolution. The Legisla tive Assembly. The King's forced acceptance of the new con- CONTENTS. xlvii stitution. Predicts the flight of La Fayette and the Lameths. Condorcet turned placeman. Character of J^irabeau. [N.] . 461 To Miss Hannah More, Sept. 29.— State of his health. The Bishop of London's charity sermon. The Miss Berrys.. Anxiety for their safe return from Italy. Miss Burney. Mrs. Barbauld's Verses on the Abolition of the Slave-trade. [N.] . . 463 To Miss Berry, Oct. 9. — ^Anxiety for their safe return. — Account of a visit to Windsor Castle. St. George's ehapel. The new screen. Jarvis's window. West's paintings. Story of Peg Nicholson. Thanks for their disinterested generosity in return ing to England. The Bolognese school. General Gunning and the tailor's wife. [N.] ..... 466 To John Pinkerton, Esq. Dec. 26. — His feelings and situation on his accession to the title of Earl of Orford. [N.] . . 469 1792. To Miss Hannah More, Jan. 1. — Increase of trouble and business occasioned by his accession to the title . . .471 To Thomas Barrett, Esq. May 14.— Darwin's " Triumph of Flora." 473 To Miss Hannah More, Aug. 21. — The massacres of Paris. Butch eries at the ThuUleries. Tortures of the King and Queen. Pleroic conduct of Madame EUzabeth. Thankfulness for the tranquillity of England. Mrs. Wolstoncroft's " Rights of Wo men." Gratitude for past comforts, and submission to his future lot. [N.] . . . . . .474 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Aug. 31. — Detail of French atrocities. Anecdotes of the Duchess of York. State of his health . 477 1793. To Miss Hannah More, Feb. 9.— French horrors. Beheading of Louis the Sixteenth. Assignats. DiaboUcal conduct of the Duke of Orleans. Heroism of Madame EUzabeth. Sublime sentence of Father Edgeworth. Speculations on the future . 479 To the same, March 23. — On her "ViUage Politics." French atheism. Massacre of Manuel. Condorcet's new constitution 484 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, June 13.— On parties and party-men. Injury done to the cause of liberty by the French repubUcans . 487 To the same, July 17.— Sultriness of the season. EngUsh feUcity. French atrocities. Separation of Marie Antoinette from her son ....••¦ 488 xlviii CONTENTS. PAGE To the Misj^errys, Sept. 17.— Reminds them of his first introduc tion to tMlS^-]. _-,... __^..'- . . .4.90 To the same, Sept. 25.— Visit of the Duchess of York to Strawberry HUl. [N.] ..... 491 To the same, Oct. 6.— Inertness of the grand aUiance against France. [N.] . . . • -493 To Miss Hannah More, Oct.— On the answer to her pamphlet against M. Dupont. Atrocities of the French atheists. [N.] 495 To the Miss Berrys, Oct. 15. — Arrest of the Duchesse de Biron, and of the Duchesse de Fleury. Execution of Marie Antoinette. The Duchesse de la Valiere. [N.] . . .497 To the same, Nov. 7. — Murder of Marie Antoinette. Loss of Lord Montagueand Mr. Burdett in the faUs of Schaffhausen. Suicide of Mr. Tickell. " Death an endless sleep." Mr. Lysons's Roman Remains. Account of his own readings. [N.] . . 499 To Miss Berry, Dec. 4. — Visit to Haymarket Theatre. Young Bannister in " The ChUdren of the Wood." The Comte de Coigni. Fate of the Due de Fleury. [N.] . . . 503 To the same, Dec. 13. — Reported successes of Lord Howe, and the Duke of Brunswick. Quarrel between Robespierre and Barrere. Fate of Barnave, Orleans, and Brissot. Mr. Jerning ham's play. Character of Mrs. Howe. [N.] . . 505 1794. To the Hon. H. S. Conway, Jan. 10. — On the gloomy prospect of affairs. Jasper Wilson's Letter to Mr. Pitt . . 508 To Miss Berry, AprU 16. — Successes in Martinico. Mrs. Piozzi's " British Synonymes." Mr. Courtenay's verses on him. [N.] . 509 To Miss Hannah More, AprU 27. — An invitation to meet Lady Waldegrave ..... ^jj To the Miss Berrys, Sept. 27.— Visit to Mrs. Damer's new house. Her bust of Mrs. Siddons. Canterbury. A Ghost story. Lord HoUand's buildings at Kingsgate. Recommends thera to visit Mr. Barrett at Lee. [N.] . . . .,0 To Miss Berry, Oct. 7.— On the advisabUity of her accepting a situation at court. [N.] ... To the Miss Berrys, Oct. 17. — On their visit to Mr. Barrett at Lee. [N.] . . . . , To the Rev. WUUam Beloe, Dee. 2. — On his intending to dedicate his translation of Aulus Gellius to Lord Orford 515519 520 CONTENTS. xlix 1795. To Miss Hannah More, Jan. 24. — With his subscription to the fund for promoting the dispersion of the Cheap Repository Tracts. Death of Condorcet, Orleans, &c. Justice of Provi dence . ... 521 To the same, Teb. 13. — On receiving some ballads written by her for the Cheap Repository. Bishop Wilson's edition of the Bible presented to her by Lord Orford . . . 523 To WiUiam Roseoe, Esq. AprU 4. — On his sending him a copy of his Life of Lorenzo de' Medici .... 524 To the Hon. H. S. Conway, July 2. — The Queen's expected visit to Strawberry HUl . . . . .526 To the same, July 7. — Account of the Queen's visit to Strawberry HUl ...... 527 1796. To Miss Berry, Aug. 16. — Mr. and Mrs. Cosway. Madame d'Ar- blay's " CamiUa." Arundel Castle. Monuments of the Fitz alans. Account of a visit from Mr. Penticross. [N.] . . 528 To the same, Aug. 24. — Arundel Castle. Chapel of the Fitz alans. [N.] ..... 531 To Miss Hannah More, Aug. 29. — Giving an account of his health ; and expressing gratitude to God for the blessings he enjoys . 532 To Richard Gough, Esq. Dee. 5. — Thanking him for the second volume of his " Sepulchral Monuments " . . . 534 To Miss Berry, Dec. 15. — Account of the debates in the House of Commons on the Loan to the Emperor. Death of Lord Orford. [N.] . . . . . .535 1797. To the Countess of Ossory, Jan. IS. ... 536 PORTRAITS IN THE SIXTH VOLUME. The Honourable Horace Walpole ; from a painting by Eckardt, at Strawberry HiU .... to front Title. Miss Mary Berry; from a bust by the Honourable Anne Sey mour Damer, in' the possession of Sir Alexander John son . . . . . . .to front p. 1 The Right Honourable Elizabeth Berkeley, Lady Craven, after wards Margravine of Anspach ; from the original by Romney, in the collection at Strawberry HiU . . . • P- 274 Full many an Artist has on canvas fix'd All charms that Nature's pencil ever mix'd, The witching of her eyes, the grace that tips The inexpressible douceur of her lips : Komney alone in this fair image caught, Each charm's expression, and each feature's thought ; And shows how in their sweet assembly sit, Taste, spirit, softness, sentiment, and wit. H. W. The Honourable Anne Seymour Damer, only child of General Conway and the Countess of Ailesbury ; from a drawing by R. Cosway, R.A. in the collection at Strawberry Hill . p. 426 W Gceafbatch. scuto :KS§ BEAmT )BKHS.liS.T. VJji 3TJST. 3T TEE SOS^^JimE SStHOUK mMKS. M THE FOSSES STCn>r OF SIR .'LJOJUJT'TOTf lonflorL , Pablis'iied "bj-^cliard Ben-fley , 1Q44 CORRESPONDENCE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry HiU, July 8, 1778. I HAVE had some conversation with a ministerial person, on the subject of pacification with France ; and he dropped a hint, that as we should not have much chance of a good peace, the Opposition would make great clamour on it. I said a few words on the duty of ministers to do what they thought right, be the consequence what it would. But as honest men do not want such lectures, and dishonest will not let them weigh, I waived that theme, to dwell on what is more likely to be persuasive, and which I am firmly persuaded is no less true than the former maxim ; and that was, that the ministers are still so strong, that if they could get a peace that would save the nation, though not a brilliant or glorious one, the nation in general would be pleased with it, and the clamours of the Opposition be insignificant. I added, what I think true, too, that no time is to be lost in treating ; not only for preventing a blow, but from the conse quences the first misfortune would have. The nation is not yet alienated from the court, but it is growing so ; is grown so VOL. VI. B 2 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. enough, for any calamity to have violent efiects. Any internal disturbance would advance the hostile designs of France. An insurrection from distress would be a double invitation to in vasion ; and, I am sure, much more to be dreaded, even per sonally, by the ministers, than the ill-humours of Opposition for even an inglorious peace. To do the Opposition justice, it is not composed of incendiaries. Parliamentary speeches raise no tumults : but tumults would be a dreadful thorough bass to speeches. The ministers do not know the strength they have left (supposing they apply it in tirae), if they are afraid of making any peace. They were too sanguine in making war; I hope they will not be too timid of making peace. What do you think of an idea of mine, of offering France a neutrality? that is, to allow her to assist both us and the Americans. I know she would assist only them : but were it not better to connive at her assisting them, without attacking us, than her doing both ? A treaty with her would perhaps be followed by one with America. We are sacrificing all the essentials we can recover, for a few words; and risking the independence of this country, for the nominal supremacy over America. France seems to leave us time for treating. She made no scruple of begging peace of us in '63, that she might lie by and recover her advantages. Was not that a wise pre cedent ? Does not she now show that it was ? Is not policy the honour of nations ? I mean, not morally, but has Europe left itself any other honour ? And since it has really left itself no honour, and as little morality, does not the morality of a nation consist in its preserving itself in as much happiness as it can ? The invasion of Portugal by Spain in the last war, and the partition of Poland, have abrogated the law of nations. Kings have left no ties between one another. Their duty to their people is still allowed. He is a good King that pre serves his people ; and if temporising answers that end, is it not justifiable ? You, who are as moral as wise, answer my questions. Grotius is obsolete. Dr. Joseph * and Dr. Frede- • The Emperor of Germany. 1778. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 3 ric,» with four hundred thousand commentators, are reading new lectures — and I should say, thank God, to one another, if the four hundred thousand commentators were not in worse danger than they.^ Louis XVL is grown a casuist compared to those partitioners. Well, let us simple individuals keep our honesty, and bless our stars that we have not armies at our command, lest we should divide kingdoms that are at our bienseancef What a dreadful thing it is for such a wicked little imp as man to have absolute power! — But I have travelled into Germany, when I meant to talk to you only of England ; and it is too late to recall my text. Good night ! TO THE REV. MR. COLE. July 12, 1778. Mr. Lout has delivered your papers to me, dear Sir, and I have already gone through them. I will try if I can make anything of them, but fear I have not art enough, as I per ceive there is absolutely but one fact — the expulsion. You have certainly very clearly proved that Mr. Baker was neither supported by Mr. Prior nor Bishop Burnet; but these are mere negatives. So is the question, whether he intended to compile an Athense Cantabrigienses or not; and on that you say but Uttle, as you have not seen his papers in the Museum. I will examine the printed catalogue, and try if I can discover the truth thence, when I go to town. I will also borrow the new Biographia, as I wish to know more of the expulsion. As it is our only fact, one would not be too dry on it. Upon the whole, I think that it would be preferable to draw up an ample character of Mr. Baker, rather than a life. The one was most beautiful, amiable, conscientious; the other totally ' Frederic II. King of Prussia. * The Emperor of Germany and King of Prussia having some dispute about Bavaria, brought immense armies into the field, but found their forces so nearly balanced, that neither ventured to attack the other ; and the Prussian monarch falUng back upon Silesia, the affair was, through the intervention of the Empress of Russia, settled by negociation, which ended in the peace of Teschen. — E. B 2 4 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. barren of more than one event : and though you have taken excellent pains to discover all that was possible, yet there is an obscurity hangs over the circumstances that even did attend him ; as his connexion with Bishop Crewe and his living. His own modesty comes out the brighter, but then it composes a character, not a life. As to Mr. Kippis and his censures, I am perfectly indif ferent to them. He betrays a pert mahgnity in hinting an intention of being severe on my father, for the pleasure of ex erting a right I allowed, and do allow, to be a just one, though it is not just to do it for that reason ; however, let him say his pleasure. The truth will not hurt my father ; falsehood will recoil on the author. His asserting, that my censure of Mr. Addison's character of Lord Somers is not to be justified, is a silly ipse dixit, as he does not, in truth cannot, show why it is not to be justified. The passage I alluded to is the argument of an old woman; and Mr. Addison's being a writer of true humour is not a jus tification of his reasoning like a superstitious gossip. In the other passage you have sent me, Mr. Kippis is perfectly in the right, and corrects me very justly. Had I ever seen Arch bishop Abbot's* Preface, with the outrageous flattery on, and lies of James I, I should certainly never have said, " Honest Abbot could not flatter." I should have said, and do say, I never saw grosser perversion of truth. One can almost ex cuse the faults of James when his bishops were such base sycophants. What can a king think of human nature, when it produces such wretches? I am too impartial to prefer Puritans to clergymen, or vice versa, when Whitgift and Abbot only ran a race of servility and adulation : the result is, that priests of all religions are the same. James and his Levites were worthy of each other; the golden calf and the idolaters were well coupled, and it is pity they ever came out of the ' Dr. George Abbot, Archbishop of Canterbury, born at GuUdford, in Surrey, in 1562. In 1604, when the translation of the Scriptures now in use was commenced by direction of King James, Dr. Abbot was the second of eight divines of Oxford to whom was committed the care of translating the New Testament, with the exception of the Epistles* He died at the palace at Croydon, in 1633. — E. 1778. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 5 wilderness. I am very glad Mr. Tyson has escaped death and disappointment: pray wish him joy of both from me. Has not this Indian summer dispersed your complaints ? We are told we are to be invaded. Our Abbots and Whitgifts nov7 see with what successes and consequences their preaching up a crusade against America has been crowned ! Archbishop Markham * may have an opportunity of exercising his martial prowess. I doubt he would resemble Bishop Crewe more than good Mr. Baker. Let us respect those only who are Israelites indeed. I surrender Dr. Abbot to you. Church and presbytery are terms for monopolies. Exalted notions of church matters are contradictions in terms to the lowliness and humility of the gospel. There is nothing sublime but the Divinity. Nothing is sacred but as His work. A tree or a brute stone is more respectable as such, than a mortal called an Archbishop, or an edifice called a Church, which are the puny and perishable productions of men. Calvin and Wesley had just the same views as the Pope; power and wealth their objects. I abhor both, and admire Mr. Baker. P. S. I like Popery as well as you, and have shown I do. I like it as I like chivalry and romance. They all furnish one with ideas and visions, which Presbyterianism does not. A Gothic church or a convent fills one with romantic dreams — but for the mysterious, the Church in the abstract, it is a jar gon that means nothing, or a great deal too much, and I re ject it and its apostles, from Athanasius to Bishop Keene.* TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Saturday, July 18, 1778. Yesterday evening the following notices were fixed up in Lloyd's coffee-house: — That a merchant in the city had received an express from France, that the Brest fleet, consist- 1 Dr. WiUiam Markham, translated to the see of York from Chester in 1776. He died in 1807.— E. » Dr. Edmund Keene, Bishop of Ely.— E. CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. ing of twenty-eight ships of the line, were sailed, with orders to burn, sink, and destroy. That Admiral Keppel was at Plymouth, and had sent to demand three more ships of the line to enable him to meet the French. On these notices stocks sunk three-and-a-half per cent An account I have received this morning from a good hand says, that on Thurs day the Admiralty received a letter from Admiral Keppel, who was off the Land's End, saying that the Worcester was in sight; that the Peggy had joined him, and had seen the Thunderer making sail for the fleet; that he was waiting for the Centaur, Terrible, and Vigilant; and that having received advice from Lord Shuldham that the Shrewsbury was to sail from Plymouth on Thursday, he should likewise wait for her. His fleet will then consist of thirty ships of the line ; and he hoped to have an opportunity of trying his strength with the French fleet on our own coast : if not, he would seek them on theirs. The French fleet sailed on the 7 th, consisting of thirty-one ships of the line, two fifty-gun ships, and eight frigates. This state is probably more authentic than those at Lloyd's. Thus you see how big the moment is ! and, unless far more favourable to us in its burst than good sense allows one to promise, it must leave us greatly exposed. Can we expect to beat without considerable loss? — and then, where have we another fleet? I need not state the danger from a reverse. The Spanish ambassador certainly arrived on Monday. I shall go to town on Monday for a day or two ; therefore, if you write to-morrow, direct to Arlington-street. I add no more: for words are unworthy of the situation; and to blame now, would be childish. It is hard to be gamed for against one's consent; but when one's country is at stake, one must throw oneself out of the question. When one is old and nobody, one must be whirled with the current, and shake one's wings like a fly, if one lights on a pebble. The pro spect is so dark, that one shall rejoice at whatever does not happen that may. Thus I have composed a sort of philo sophy for myself, that reserves every possible chance. You want none of these artificial aids to your resolution. Invincible 1778. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 7 courage and immaculate integrity are not dependent on the folly of ministers or on the events of war. Adieu ! TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Strawberry HiU, July 24, 1778. Upon reviewing your papers, dear Sir, I think I can make more of them than I at first conceived. I have even commenced the life, and do not dislike my ideas for it, if the execution does but answer. At present I am interrupted by another task, which you, too, have wished me to under take. In a word, somebody has pubhshed Chatterton's works, and charged me heavily for having discountenanced him. He even calls for the indignation of the public against me. It is somewhat singular, that I am to be offered up as a victim at the altar of a notorious impostor ! but as many saints have been impostors, so many innocent persons have been sacrificed to them. However, I shall not be patient under this attack, but shall publish an answer — the nar rative I mentioned to you. I would, as you know, have avoided entering into this affair if I could; but as I do not despise public esteem, it is necessary to show how ground less the accusation is. Do not speak of my intention, as perhaps I shall not execute it immediately. I am not in the least acquainted with the Mr. Bridges you mention, nor know that I ever saw him. The tomb for Mr. Gray is actually erected, and at the generous ex pense of Mr. Mason, and with an epitaph of four lines,i as you heard, and written by him — but the scaffolds are not yet removed. I was in town yesterday, and intended to visit it, but there is digging a vault for the family of Northumberland, which obstructs the removal of the boards. I rejoice in your amendment, and reckon it among my > " No more the Grecian Muse unrivall'd reigns ; To Britain let the nations homage pay : She felt a Homer's fire in Milton's strains, A Pindar's rapture in the lyre of Gray."— E. 8 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. obligations to the fine weather, and hope it will be the most lasting of them. Yours ever. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Strawberry HiU, August 15, 1778. YouB observation of Rowley not being mentioned by William of Wyrcestre, is very strong, indeed, dear Sir, and I shall certainly take notice of it. It has suggested to me that he is not named by Bale or Pitts" — is he? Will you trouble yourself to look ? I conclude he is not, or we should have heard of it. Rowley is the reverse of King Arthur, and all those heroes that have been expected a second time ; he is to come again for the first time — I mean, as a great poet. My defence amounts to thirty pages of the size of this paper: yet I believe I shall not publish it. I abhor a controversy ; and what is it to me whether people believe in an impostor or not? Nay, shall I convince everybody of my innocence, though there is not the shadow of reason for thinking I was to blame? If I met a beggar in the street, and refused him sixpence, thinking him strong enough to work, and two years afterwards he should die of drinking, might not I be told I had deprived the world of a capital rope-dancer? In short, to show one's self sensible to such accusations, would only invite more; and since they accuse me of contempt, I will have it for my accusers. My brass plate for Bishop Walpole was copied exactly from the print in Dart's Westminster, of the tomb of Robert Dalby, Bishop of Durham, with the sole alteration of the name. I shall return, as soon as I have time, to Mr. Baker's Life; but I shall want to consult you, or, at least, the ac count of him in the new Biographia, as your notes want some dates. I am not satisfied yet with what I have sketched* ' John Bale, Bishop of Ossory. The work to which Walpole alludes is his " Catalogus Scriptorum Ulustrium Majoris Brytannie." Basle 1557-9. —John Pitts wrote, in opposition to Bale, " De illustrihns AngUae Scriptoribus." Paris, 1619.— E. ""rious 1778. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 9 but I shall correct it. My small talent was grown very dull. This attack about Chatterton has a little revived it; but it warns me to have done ; for, if one comes to want provoca tives, the produce will soon be feeble. Adieu ! Yours most sincerely. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry HiU, August 21, 1778. I THINK it 80 very uncertain whether this letter will find you, that I write it merely to tell you I received yours to-day. I recollect nothing particularly worth seeing in Sussex that you have not seen (for I think you have seen Coudray and Stansted, and I know you have Petworth), but Hurst Monceaux, near Battle ; and I don't know whe ther it is not pulled down. The site of Arundel Castle is fine, and there are some good tombs of the Fitzalans at the church, but little remains of the castle ; in the room of which is a modern brick house; and in the late Duke's time the ghost of a giant walked there, his grace said — but I sup pose the present Duke has laid it in the Red Sea — of claret. Besides Knowle and Penshurst, I should think there were several seats of old families in Kent worth seeing; but I do not know them. I poked out Summer-hilP for the sake of the Babylonienne in Grammont ; but it is now a mere farm house. Don't let them persuade you to visit Leeds Castle, which is not worth seeing. You have been near losing me and half a dozen fair cousins to-day. The Goldsmiths' Company dined in Mr. Shirley's field, next to Pope's. I went to Ham with my three Wal degrave nieces and Miss Keppel, and saw them land, and dine in tents erected for them, from the opposite shore. You may imagine how beautiful the sight was in such a spot and in such a day ! I stayed and dined at Ham, and after ' Formerly a country-seat of Queen Elizabeth, and the residence of Charles the Second when the court was at Tunbridge. — E. 10 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. dinner Lady Dysart with Lady Bridget ToUemache took our four nieces on the water to see the return of the barges, but were to set me down at Lady Browne's. We were, with a footman and the two watermen, ten in a httle boat As we were in the middle of the river, a larger boat full of people drove directly upon us on purpose. I believe they were drunk. We called to them, to no purpose ; they beat directly against the middle of our little skiff — but, thank you, did not do us the least harm — no thanks to them. Lady Malpas was in Lord Strafford's garden, and gave us for gone. In short, Neptune never would have had so beau tiful a prize as the four girls. I hear an express has been sent to * * * * to offer him the mastership of the horse. I had a mind to make you guess, but you never can — to Lord Exeter ! Pray let me know the moment you return to Park-place. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Strawberry Hill, August 22, 1778. I BEG you will feel no uneasiness, dear Sir, at having shown my name to Dr. Glynn. I can never suspect you, who are giving me fresh proofs of your friendship, and so licitude for my reputation, of doing anything unkind. It is true I do not think I shall publish anything about Chat terton. Is not it an affront to Innocence, not to be per fectly satisfied in her? My pamphlet, for such it would be, is four times as large as the narrative in your hands, and I think would not discredit me — but, in truth, I am grown much fonder of truth than fame ; and scribblers or their patrons shall not provoke me to sacrifice the one to the other. Lord Hardwicke, I know, has long been my enemy, — latterly, to get a sight of the Conway Papers, he has paid great court to me, which, to show how little I regarded his enmity, I let him see, at least the most curious. But as I set as little value on his friendship, I did not grant an other of his requests. Indeed, I have made more than one 1778. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 11 foe by not indulging the vanity of those who have made application to me; and I am obliged to them, when they augment my contempt by quarrelhng with me for that re fusal. It was the case of Mr. Masters, and is now of Lord Hardwicke. He sohcited me to reprint his Boeotian volume of Sir Dudley Carleton's Papers, for which he had two mo tives. The first he inherited from his father, the desire of saving money ; for though his fortune is so much larger than mine, he knew I would not let out my press for hire, but should treat him with the expense, as I have done for those I have obliged. The second was, that the rarity of my editions makes them valuable, and though I cannot make men read dull books, I can make them purchase them. His lordship, therefore, has bad grace in affecting to overlook one, whom he had in vain courted, yet he again is grown my enemy, because I would not be my own. For my writ ings, they do not depend on him or the venal authors he patronizes (I doubt very frugally), but on their own merits or demerits. It is from men of sense they must expect their sentence, not from boobies and hireling authors, whom I have always shunned, with the whole fry of minor wits, critics, and monthly censors. I have not seen the Review you mention, nor ever do, but when something particular is pointed out to me. Literary squabbles I know preserve one's name, when one's work will not; but I despise the fame that depends on scolding till one is remembered, and remembered by whom ? The scavengers of literature ! Re viewers are like sextons, who in a charnel-house can tell you to what John Thompson or to what Tom Matthews such a skull or such belonged — but who wishes to know? The fame that is only to be found in such vaults, is like the fires that burn unknown in tombs, and go out as fast as they are discovered. Lord Hardwicke is welcome to live among the dead if he likes it, and can contrive to live nowhere else. Chatterton did abuse me under the title of Baron of Otranto,^ but unluckily the picture is more like Dr. Milles ' Chatterton exhibited a ridiculous portrait of Walpole, in the " Me- 12 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. and Chatterton's own devotees, than to me, who am but a re creant antiquary, and, as the poor lad found by experience, did not swallow every fragment that was offered to me as an antique ; though that is a feature he has bestowed upon me. I have seen, too, the criticism you mention on the Castle of Otranto, in the preface to the Old English Baron.^ It is not at all obhque, but, though mixed with high compliments, directly attacks the visionary part, which, says the author or authoress, makes one laugh. I do assure you, I have not had the smallest inclination to return that attack. It would even be ungrateful, for the work is a professed imitation of mine, only stripped of the marvellous ; and so entirely stripped, ex cept in one awkward attempt at a ghost or two, that it is the most insipid dull nothing you ever saw. It certainly does not make one laugh ; for what makes one doze, seldom makes one merry. I am very sorry to have talked for near three pages on what relates to myself, who should be of no consequence, if people did not make me so, whether I will or not. My not replying to them, I hope, is a proof I do not seek to make myself the topic of conversation. How very foolish are the squabbles of authors ! They buzz and are troublesome to-day, and then repose for ever on some shelf in a college library, close by their antagonists, like Henry VI. and Edward IV. at Windsor. I shall be in town in a few days, and will send you the heads of painters, which I left there ; and along with them for yourself a translation of a French play,^ that I have just printed there. It is not for your reading, but as one of the Strawberry editions, and one of the rarest ; for I have printed moirs of a Sad Dog," under the character of " the redoubted Baron Otranto, who bas spent his whole life in conjectures." E. ' The Old English Baron, a romance of considerable repute which has been frequently reprinted, was the production of Clara Reeve' This ingenious lady had pubUshed, in 1772, a translation of Barclay's Latin romance of Argenis, under the title of " The Pheenix, or the History of Polyarchus and Argenia." She was bom at Ipswich in 1738 and died there in 1808. — E. ' " "J^t,S'^t" T^J^?,'''"J'T^«"y ^iU 1778. It was translated from the French of M. Pont de Veyle, by Lady Craven, afterwards Mar gravine of Anspach. — E. 1778. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 13 but seventy-five copies. It was to oblige Lady Craven, the translatress ; and will be an aggravation of my offence to Sir Dudley's State Papers. I hope this Elysian summer, for it has been above Indian, has dispersed all your complaints. Yet it does not agree with fruit ; the peaches and nectarines are shrivelled to the size of damsons, and half of them drop. Yet you remember what portly bellies the peaches had at Paris, where it is generally as hot. I suppose our fruit-trees are so accustomed to rain, that they don't know how to behave without it. Adieu ! P. S. I can divert you with a new adventure, that has hap pened to me in the hterary way. About a month ago, I re ceived a letter from a Mr. Jonathan Scott, at Shrewsbury, to tell me he was possessed of a MS. of Lord Herbert's Account of the Court of France,^ which he designed to publish by sub scription, and which he desired me to subscribe to, and to assist in the publication. I replied, that having been obhged to the late Lord Powis and his widow, I could not meddle with any such thing, without knowing that it had the consent of the present Earl and his mother. Another letter, commending my reserve, told me Mr. Scott had applied for it formerly, and would again now. This showed me they did not consent. I have just received a third letter, owning the approbation is not yet arrived ; but to keep me employed in the mean time, the modest Mr. Scott, whom I never saw, nor know more of than I did of Chatterton, pro poses to me to get his fourth son a place in the civil depart ment in India : the father not choosing it should be in the mili tary, his three elder sons being engaged in that branch already. If this fourth son breaks his neck, I suppose it will be laid to my charge ! Yours ever. ' By Lord Herbert's Account of the Court of France, Mr. Scott most probably referred to his " Letters written during his residence at the Erench Court," and which were first published from the originals, in the edition of his Life which appeared in 1826. — B. 14 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. September 1, 1778. I HAVE now seen the Critical Review, with Lord Hard wicke's note, in which I perceive the sensibihty of your friend ship for me, dear Sir, but no rudeness on his part. Con temptuous it was to reprint Jane Shore's letter without any notice of my having given it before : the apology, too, is not made to me — but I am not affected by such incivilities, that imply more ill-will than boldness. As I expected more from your representation, I beheve I expressed myself with more warmth than the occasion deserved ; and, as I love to be just, I will, now I am perfectly cool, be so to Lord Hardwicke. His dislike of me was meritorious in him, as I conclude it was founded on my animosity to his father, as mine had been, from attachment to my own, who was basely betrayed by the late Earl. The present has given me formerly many peevish marks of enmity ; and I suspect, I don't know if justly, that he was the mover of the cabal in the Antiquarian Society against me — but all their misunderstandings were of a size that made me smile rather than provoke me. The Earl, as I told you, has since been rather wearisome in applications to me; which I received very civilly, but encouraged no farther. When he wanted me to be his printer, I own I was not good Christian enough, not to be pleased with refusing, and yet in as well-bred excuses as I could form, pleading, what was true at the time, as you know, that I had laid down my press — but so much for this idle story. I shall think no more of it, but adhere to my specific system. The antiquarians will be as ridiculous as they used to be ; and, since it is impossible to infuse taste into them, they will be as dry and dull as their predecessors. One may revive what perished, but it will perish again, if more hfe is not breathed into it than it en joyed originally. Facts, dates, and names will never please the multitude, unless there is some style and manner to re commend them, and unless some novelty is struck out from their appearance. The best merit of the society lies in their 1778. THE HON. HORACE' WALPOLE. 15 prints ; for their volumes, no mortal will ever touch them but an antiquary. Their Saxon and Danish discoveries are not worth more than monuments of the Hottentots ; and for Ro man remains in Britain, they are upon a foot with what ideas we should get of Inigo Jones, if somebody was to publish views of huts and houses, that our officers run up at Senegal and Goree. Bishop Lyttelton used to torment me with bar rows and Roman camps, and I would as soon have attended to the turf graves in our church-yards. I have no curiosity to know how awkward and clumsy men have been in the dawn of arts, or in their decay. I exempt you entirely from my general censure on antiqua ries, both for your singular modesty in pubhshing nothing yourself, and for collecting stone and bricks for others to build with. I wish your materials may ever fall into good hands — perhaps they will I our empire is falhng to pieces ! we are relapsing to a little island. In that state, men are apt to inquire how great their ancestors have been; and, when a kingdom is past doing anything, the few that are studious look into the memorials of past time ; nations, like private persons, seek lustre from their progenitors, when they have none in themselves, and the farther they are from the dignity of their source. When half its colleges are tumbled down, the ancient University of Cambridge will revive from your Collections,' and you will be quoted as a living witness that saw its splendour. ' His valuable CoUections, in about a hundred volumes, in folio, fairly written in his own hand, Mr. Cole, on his death in 1782, left to the Bri tish Museum, to be locked up for twenty years. His Diary, as will be seen by a specimen or two, is truly ludicrous: — "Jan. 25, 1766. Foggy. My beautiful parrot died at ten at night, without knowing the cause of his Ulness, he being very weU last night. — Feb. 1. Fine day, and cold. WUl. Wood carried three or four loads of dung into the clay- pit close. Baptized WUliam, the son of William Grace, blacksmith, whom I married about six months before. — March 3. I baptized Sarah, the bastard daughter of the Widow Smallwood, of Eton, aged near fifty, whose husband died about a year ago. — March 6. Very fine weather. My man was blooded. I sent a loin of pork and a spare-rib to Mr. Cartwright, in London. — 27. I sent my two French wigs to my London barber to alter them, they being made so miserably I coidd not wear them. — June 17. I went to our new Archdeacon's visitation at Newport- Pagnel. I took young H. Travel with me on my dun-horse, in order 16 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. Since I began this letter, I have had another curious adven ture. I was in the Holbein chamber, when a chariot stopped at my door. A letter was brought up — and who should be below but — Dr. Kippis. The letter was to announce himself and his business, flattered me on my writings, desired my assistance, and particularly my direction and aid for his writing the life of my father. I desired he would walk up, and received him very civilly, taking not the smallest notice of what you had told me of his flirts at me in the new Biogra phia. I told him, if I had been applied to, I could have pointed out many errors in the old edition, but as they were chiefly in the printing, I supposed they would be corrected. With regard to my father's life, I said, it might be partiality, but I had such confidence in my father's virtues, that I was satisfied the more his life was examined, the clearer they would appear. That I also thought that the life of any ma.n written under the direction of his family, did nobody honour ; and that, as I was persuaded my father's would stand the test, I wished that none of his relations should interfere in it. That I did not doubt but the Doctor would speak impartially, and that was all I desired. He replied, that he did sup pose I thought in that manner, and that all he asked was to be assisted in facts and dates. I said, if he would please to write the life first, and then communicate it to me, I would point out any errors in facts that I should perceive. He seemed mightily well satisfied — and so we parted — but is it not odd, that people are continually attacking me, and then come to me for assistance ? — but when men write for profit, they are not very delicate. I have resumed Mr. Baker's life, and pretty well arranged my plan ; but I shall have httle time to make any progress till October, as I am going soon to make some visits. Yours ever. that he might hear the organ, he being a great psalm-singer. The most numerous appearance of clergy that I remember : forty-four dined with the Archdeacon ; and, what is extraordinary, not one smoked tobacco. My new coach-horse ungain. — Aug. 16. Cool day. Tom reaped for Joe Holdom. I cudgeUed Jem for staying so long on an errand " &e. E. 1778. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 17 TO THE REV. MR. COLE. strawberry HiU, Sept. 18, 1778. I HAVE run through the new articles in the Biographia, and think them performed but by a heavy hand. Some per sons have not trusted the characters of their ancestors, as I did my father's, to their own merits. On the contrary, I have met with one whose corruption is attempted to be palHated by imputing its punishment to the revenge of my father — which, by the way, is confessing the guilt of the convict. This was the late Lord Barrington,' who, I believe, was a very dirty fellow ; for, besides being expelled the House of Commons ou the affair of the Harburgh lottery, he was reckoned to have twice sold the Dissenters to the court; but in short, what credit can a Biographia Britannica, which ought to be a standard work, deserve, when the editor is a mercenary writer, who runs about to relations for directions, and adopts any tale they deliver to him ? This very instance is a proof that it is not a jot more creditable than a peerage. The authority is said to be a nephew of Judge Foster (consequently, I suppose, a friend of Judge Barrington), and he pretends to have found a scrap of paper, nobody knows on what occasion written, that seems to be connected with nothing, and is called a palliative, if not an excuse of Lord Barrington's crime. A man is ex pelled from Parliament for a scandalous job, and it is called a sufficient excuse to say the minister was his enemy ; and this nearly forty years after the death of both ! and without any impeachment of the justice of the sentence : instead of which we are told that Lord Barrington was suspected of having ' John Shute, first Viscount Barrington in the peerage of Ireland, ex pelled the House of Commons in February 1723, for having promoted, abetted, and carried on that fraudulent undertaking, the Harburgh lot tery. 'Phis lottery took its name from the place where it was to be drawn, the town and port of Harburgh, on the river Elbe, where the projector was to settle a trade for the woollen manufacture between England and Germany. Lord Barrington was distinguished for theological learning, and published " Miscellanea Critica," and an " Essay on the several Dispensations of God to Mankind." He died in 1734, leaving five sons, who had the rare fortune of each rising to high stations in the church, the state, the law, the army, and the navy. — E. VOL. VI. C 18 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. offended Sir Robert Walpole, who took that opportunity of being revenged. Supposing he did — which at most you see is a suspicion grounded on a suspicion — it would at least im ply, that he had found a good opportunity. — A most admirable acquittal ! Sir Robert Walpole was expelled for having in dorsed a note that was not for his own benefit, nor ever sup posed to be, and it was the act of a whole outrageous party ; yet, abandoned as parhaments sometimes are, a minister would not find them very complaisant in gratifying his private re venge against a member without some notorious crime. Not a syllable is said of any defence the culprit made ; and, had my father been guilty of such violence and injustice, it is totally incredible that he, whose minutest acts and his most innocent were so rigorously scrutinized, tortured, and black ened, should never have heard that act of power complained of. The present Lord Barrington, who opposed him, saw his fall, and the secret committee appointed to canvass his life, when a retrospect of twenty years was desired and only ten allowed, would certainly have pleaded for the longer term, had he had anything to say in behalf of his father's sentence. Would so warm a patriot then, though so obedient a courtier now, have suppressed the charge to this hour? This Lord Barrington, when I was going to publish the second edition of my Noble Authors, begged it as a favour of me to suppress all mention of his father — a strong presumption that he was ashamed of him. I am well repaid ! but I am certainly now at liberty to record that good man. I shall — and shall take notice of the satisfactory manner in which his sons have whitewashed their patriarch ! I recollect a saying of the present peer that will divert you when contrasted with forty years of servility, which even in this age makes him a proverb. It was in his days of virtue. He said, " If I should ever be so unhappy as to have a place that would make it necessary for me to have a fine coat on a birth-day, I would pin a bank-bill on my sleeve." He had a place in less than two years, I think — and has had almost every place that every administration could bestow.' * See vol. i. p. 190. Araong the MitcheU MSS. is a letter from Lord 1778. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 19 Such were the patriots that opposed that excellent man, my father; allowed by all parties to have been as incapable of revenge as ever minister was — but whose experience of man kind drew from him that memorable saying, " that very few men ought to be prime ministers, for it is not fit many should know how bad men are ;" — one can see a httle of it without being a prime minister. If one shuns mankind and flies to books, one meets with their meanness and falsehood there, too ! one has reason to say, there is but one good, that is God. Adieu ! Yours ever. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Oct. 14, 1778. I THINK you take in no newspapers, nor I beUeve con descend to read any more modern than the Paris a la Main at the time of the Ligue ; consequently you have not seen a new scandal on my father, which you will not wonder offends me. You cannot be interested in his defence; but, as it comprehends some very curious anecdotes, you will not grudge my indulging myself to a friend in vindicating a name so dear to me. In the accounts of Lady Chesterfield's' death and fortune, it is said that the late King, at the*instigation of Sir Robert Walpole, burnt his father''s will which contained a large legacy to that, his supposed, daughter, and I beheve his real one ; for she was very like him, as her brother, General Schulembourg, is, in black, to the late King. The fact of Barrington, in which he says, " No man knows what is good for him : my invariable rule, therefore, is to ask nothing, to refuse nothing ; to let others place me, and to do my best wherever I am placed. The same strange fortune which made me secretary of war five years ago has made me chanceUor of the exchequer ; it may perhaps at last make me pope. I think I am equaUy fit to be at the head of the church as the exchequer." — ^E. ' Malosina de Schulenbourg, a natural daughter of George I, by Miss Schulenbourg, afterwards created Duchess of Kendal. She was created, in 1722, Countess of Walsingham and Baroness of Aldborough, and was the widow of PhUip Dormer Stanhope, the celebrated Earl of Chester field, who died in 1773.— E. 0 2 20 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. suppressing the will is indubitably true ; the instigator most false, as I can demonstrate thus : — When the news arrived of the death of George the First, my father carried the account from Lord Townshend to the then Prince of Wales. One of the first acts of royalty is for the new monarch to make a speech to the privy council. Sir Robert asked the King who he would please to have draw the Speech, which was, in fact, asking who was to be prime minister ; to which his Majesty replied. Sir Spencer Comp ton. It is a wonderful anecdote, and but httle known, that the new premier, a very dull man, could not draw the Speech, and the person to whom he apphed was the deposed premier. The Queen, who favoured my father, observed how unfit a man was for successor, who was reduced to beg assistance of his predecessor. The council met as soon as possible, the next morning at latest. There Archbishop Wake, with whom one copy of the will had been deposited, (as another was, I think, with the Duke of Wolfenbuttle, who had a pension for sacrificing it, which, I know, the late Duke of Newcastle transacted,) advanced, and delivered the will to the King, who put it into his pocket, and went out of coun cil without opening it, the Archbishop not having courage or presence of mind to desire it to be read, as he ought to have done. These circumstances, which I solemnly assure you are strictly true, prove that my father neither advised, nor was consulted ; nor is it credible that the King in one night's time should have passed from the intention of disgracing him, to make him his bosom confidant on so delicate an affair. I was once talking to the late Lady Suffolk, the former mistress, on that extraordinary event. She said, " I cannot justify the deed to the legatees ; but towards his father, the late King was justifiable, for George the First had burnt two wills made in favour of George the Second." I suppose they were the testaments of the Duke and Duchess of Zell, pa rents of George the First's wife, whose treatment of her they always resented. 1778. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 21 I said, / know the transactions of the Duke of Newcastle. The late Lord Waldegrave showed me a letter from that Duke to the first Earl of Waldegrave, then ambassador at Paris, with directions about that transaction, or, at least, about payment of the pension, I forget which.' I have somewhere, but cannot turn to it now, a memorandum of that affair, and who the Prince was, whom I may mistake in calling Duke of Wolfenbuttle. There was a third copy of the will, I likewise forget with whom deposited. The newspaper says, which is true, that Lord Chesterfield filed a bill in chancery against the late King to oblige him to pro duce the will, and was silenced, I think, by payment of twenty thousand pounds. There was another legacy to his own daughter the Queen of Prussia, which has at times been, and, I beheve, is still claimed by the King of Prussia. Do not mention any part of this story; but it is worth preserving, as I am sure you are satisfied with my scru pulous veracity. It may perhaps be authenticated hereafter by collateral evidence that may come out. If ever true his tory does come to light, my father's character will have just honour paid to it. Lord Chesterfield, one of his sharpest enemies, has not, with all his prejudices, left a very un favourable account of him, and it would alone be raised by a comparison of their two characters. Think of one who calls Sir Robert the corrupter of youth, leaving a system of education to poison them from their nursery ! Chester field, Pulteney, and Bolingbroke were the saints that reviled my father ! I beg your pardon, but you will allow me to open my heart to you when it is full. Yours ever. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. October 23, 1778. ****** Having thus told you all I know, I shall add a few words, to say I conclude you have known as much, ' See Walpole's Memoires of George the Second, vol. U. p. 458. — E. 22 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. by my not having heard from you. Should the post-office or secretary's office set their wits at work to bring to hght all the intelligence contained under the above hiatus, I am con fident they will discover nothing, though it gives an exact description of all they have been about themselves. My personal history is very short. I have had an assem bly and the rheumatism — and am buying a house — and it rains — and I shall plant the roses against my treillage to morrow. Thus you know what I have done, suffered, am doing, and shaU do. Let rae know as much of you, in quantity, not in quahty. Introductions to, and conclusions of, letters are as much out of fashion, as to, at, &c. on letters. This subhme age reduces everything to its quintessence: all periphrases and expletives are so much in disuse, that I suppose soon the only way of making love will be to say " Lie down." Luckily, the lawyers will not part with any synonymous words, and will, consequently, preserve the re dundancies of our language — Dixi. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. October 26, 1778. I HAVE finished the Life of Mr. Baker, will have it transcribed, and send it to you. I have omitted several httle particulars that are in your notes, for two reasons; one, be cause so much is said in the Biographia; and the other, because I have rather drawn a character of him, than meant a circumstantial life. In the justice I have done to him, I trust I shall have pleased you. I have much greater doubt of that effect in what I have said of his principles and party. It is odd, perhaps, to have made use of the life of a high churchman for expatiating on my own very opposite prin ciples; but it gave me so fair an opportunity of discussing those points, that I very naturally embraced it. I have done due honour to his immaculate conscience, but have not spared the cause in which he fell, — or rather rose, — for the ruin of his fortune was the triumph of his virtue. 1778. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 23 As you know I do not love the press, you may be sure I have no thoughts of printing this life at present ; nay, I beg you will not only not communicate it, but take care it never should be printed without my consent. I have written what presented itself; I should perhaps choose to soften several passages; and I trust it to you for your own satisfaction, not as a finished thing, or as I am determined it should remain. Another favour I beg of you is to criticise it as largely and severely as you please : you have a right so to do, as it is built with your own materials; nay, you have a right to scold if I have, nay, since I have, employed them so dif ferently from your intention. All my excuse is, that you communicated them to one who did not deceive you, and who you was pretty sure would make nearly the use of them that he has made. Was not you? did not you suspect a little that I could not even write a Life of Mr. Baker with out talking Whiggism ! — Well, if I have ill-treated the cause, I am sure I have exalted the martyr. I have thrown new hght on his virtue from his notes on the Gazettes, and you will admire him more, though you may love me less, for my chymistry. I should be truly sorry if I did lose a scruple of your friendship. You have ever been as candid to me, as Mr. Baker was to his antagonists, and our friend ship is another proof that men of the most opposite prin ciples can agree in everything else, and not quarrel about them. As my manuscript contains above twenty pages of my writing on larger paper than this, you cannot receive it speedily — however, I have performed my promise, and I hope you will not be totally discontent, though I am not satisfied with myself. I have executed it by snatches and by long interruptions; and not having been eager about it, I find I wanted that ardour to inspire me; another proof of what I told you, that my small talent is waning, and wants provocatives. It shall be a warning to me. Adieu ! 24 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. ArUngton Street, Nov. 4, 1778. You will see by my secretary's hand, that I am not able to write myself; indeed, I am in bed with the gout in six places, hke Daniel in the den ; but, as the lions are slumber ing round me, and leave me a moment of respite, I employ it to give you one. You have misunderstood me, dear Sij : I have not said a word that will lower Mr. Baker's character ; on the contrary, I think he will come out brighter from my ordeal. In truth, as I have drawn out his life from your papers, it is a kind of political epic, in which his conscience is the hero that always triumphs over his interest upon the most opposite occasions. Shall you dislike your saint in this light? I had transcribed about half when I fell ill last week. If the gout does not seize my right hand, I shall probably have full leisure to finish it during my recovery, but shall certainly not be able to send it to you by Mr. Lort. Your promise fully satisfies me. My life can never extend to twenty years.' Any one that saw me this moment would not take me for a Methusalem. I have not strength to dictate more now, except to add, that if Mr. Nicholls has seen my narrative about Chatterton, it can only be my letter to Mr. Barrett, of which you have a copy ; the larger one has not yet been out of my own house. Yours most sincerely. TO LADY BR0WNE.2 ArUngton Street, Nov. 5, 1778. Your ladyship is exceedingly kind and charitable, and the least I can do in return is to do all I can — dictate a let ter to you. I have not been out of bed longer than it was necessary to have it made, once a day, since last Thursday. ' Mr. Cole had informed Walpole that his collections were not to be opened until twenty years after his death. See ante, p. 15. — E. 2 Now first printed. See vol. v. p. 184. 1778. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 25 The gout is in both my feet, both my knees, and in my left hand and elbow. Had I a mind to brag, I could boast of a little rheumatism too, but I scorn to set value on such a trifle ; nay, I will own that I have felt little acute pain. My chief propensity to exaggeration would be on the miserable nights I have passed ; and yet whatever I should say would not be be yond what I thought I suffered. I have been constantly as broad awake as any Mrs. Candour that is always gaping for Scajidal,' except when I have taken opiates, and then my dreams have been as extravagant as all Mrs. Candour adds to what she hears. In short, Madam, not to tire you with more details, though you have ordered them, I am so weak that I am able to see nobody at all, and when I shall be recovered enough to take possession of this new lease, as it is called, the mansion, I believe, will be so shattered that it won't be worth repairs. Is it not very foolish, then, to be literally buying a new house? Is it not verifying Pope's line, when I choose a pretty situation, " But just to look about us and to die ? " I am sorry Lady Jane's lot is fallen in Westphalia, where so great a hog is lord of the manor. He is like the dragon of Wantley, " And houses and churches To him are geese and turkeys ; " so I don't wonder that he has gobbled her two cows. Lady Blandford is delightful in congratulating me upon having the gout in town, and staying in the country herself. Nay, she is very insolent in presuming to be the only person invulnerable. If I could wish her any harm, it should be that she might feel for one quarter of an hour a taste of the mortifi cations that I suffered from eleven last night till four this morn ing, and I am sure she would never dare to have a spark of courage again. I can only wish her in Grosvenor-square, ' Sheridan's popular comedy of the " School for Scandal," which came out at Drury-lane theatre in May 1777, was at this time as much the favourite of the town as ever. — E. 26 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. where she would run no risks. Her reputation for obstinacy is so well estabhshed, that she might take advice from her true friends for a twelvemonth, before we should believe our own ears. However, as everybody has some weak part, I know she will do for others more than for herself; and there fore, pray Madam, tell her, that I am sure it is bad for your ladyship to stay in the country at this time of year, and that reason I am sure will bring you both. I really must rest. TO LADY BR0WNE.1 ArUngton Street, Dec. 18, 1778. My not writing with my own hand, to thank your lady ship for your very obliging letter, is the worst symptom that remains with me, Madam: all pain and swelling are gone; and I hope in a day or two to get a glove even on my right hand, and to walk with help into the next room by the end of next week. I did, I confess, see a great deal too much com pany too early ; and was such an old child as to prattle abun dantly, till I was forced to shut myself up for a week and see nobody ; but I am quite recovered, and the emptiness of the town will soon preserve me from any excesses. I am exceedingly glad to hear your ladyship finds so much benefit from the air : I own I thought you looked ill the last time I had the honour of seeing you ; and though I am sorry to hear you talk with so much satisfaction of a country hfe, I am not selfish enough to wish you to leave Tusmore^ a day be fore your health is quite re-established, nor to envy Mr. Fer- mor so agreeable an addition to his society and charming seat. Poor Lady Albemarle is indeed very miserable and full of apprehensions ; though the incredible zeal of the navy for Ad miral Keppel crowns him with glory, and the indignation of mankind, and the execration of Sir Hugh, add to the triumph. ' Now first printed. " Lady Browne's first husband was Henry Fermor, Esq. grandfather of Mr. Fermor of Tusmore House. She was a Miss Sheldon. E. 1778. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 27 Indeed, I still think Lady A.'s fears may be well founded: some slur may be procured on her son; and his own bad nerves, and worse constitution, may not be able to stand agita tion and suspense.' Lady Blandford has had a cold, but I hear is well again, and has generally two tables. She will be a loss indeed to all her friends, and to hundreds more; but she cannot be im mortal, nor would be, if she could. The writings are not yet signed, Madam, for my house, but I am in no doubt of having it ; yet I shall not think of going into it till the spring, as I cannot enjoy this year's gout in it, and will not venture catching a codicil, by going backwards and forwards to it before it is aired. I know no particular news, but that Lord Bute was thought in great danger yesterday ; I have heard nothing of him to day. I do not know even a match, but of some that are going to be divorced ; the fate of one of the latter is to be turned into an exaltation, and is treated by her family and friends in ' Some charges having been brought against Admiral Keppel for his conduct at the battle off Ushant, by Sir Hugh Palliser, his vice-admiral, he was tried for the same, and not only unanimously acquitted, but the prosecution declared maUcious. This verdict gave such general satis faction, that London was iUuminated for two nights ; upon one of which a mob, consisting in great part of sailors who had served under Keppel, broke aU the windows in the house of his accuser. The city of London voted the Admiral the freedom of the corporation. In 1782, he was created Viscount Keppel, and appointed first lord of the admiralty. He died unmarried, in October 1786. The foUowing is apart of Mr. Burke's beautiful panegyric on him, at the conclusion of his Letter to a Noble Lord : — " I ever looked on Lord Keppel as one of the greatest and best men of his age, and I loved and cultivated him accordingly. It was at his trial that he gave me this picture. With what zeal and anxious affection I attended him through that his agony of glory; what part my son took in the early flush and enthusiasm of his virtue, and the pious passion with which he attached himself to aU my connexions ; with what prodigality we both squandered ourselves in courting almost every sort of enmity for his sake, I believe he felt, just as I should have felt sueh friendship on such an occasion. I partook, indeed, of this honour with several of the first, and best, and ablest in the kingdom ; but I was be hind with none of them ; and I am sure that if, to the eternal disgrace of this nation, and to the total annihilation of every trace of honour and virtue in it, things had taken a different turn from what they did, I should have attended him to the quarter-deck with no less good-wUl and more pride, though with far other feeUngs, than I partook of the gene ral flow of national joy that attended the justice that was done to his virtue."— E. 28 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. quite a new style, to the discomfit of all prudery. It puts me in mind of Lord Lansdowne's lines in the room in the Tower where my father had been confined, " Some fall so hard, they bound and rise again." Methinks, however, it is a little hard on Lord George Ger maine, that in four months after seeing a Duchess of Dorset, he may see a Lord Middlesex too ; for so old the egg is said to be, that is already prepared. If this trade goes on, half the peeresses will have two eldest sons with both fathers ahve at the same time. Lady Holderness expresses nothing but grief and willingness to receive her daughter' again on any terms, which probably will happen ; for the daughter has al ready opened her eyes, is sensible of her utter ruin, and has written to Lord Carmarthen and Madam Cordon, acknowledg ing her guilt, and begging to be remembered only with pity, which is sufficient to make one pity her. I would beg pardon for so long a letter, but your ladyship desired intelhgence, and I know a long letter from London is not uncomfortable at Christmas, even in the most comfortable house in the country. Perhaps my own forced idleness has a little contributed to lengthen it ; still I hope it implies great readiness to obey your ladyship's commands, in your most obedient humble servant TO THE EARL OF BUCHAN.^ Arlington Street, Dec. 24, 1778. It was an additional mortification to my illness, my lord, that I was not able to thank your lordship with my own hand ' Amelia D'Arcy, Baroness Conyers, daughter of Robert, fourth Earl of Holderness, married to Lord Carmarthen ; who had eloped with Captain John Byron, father of the great poet. — E. 2 Now first printed. David Stewart Erskine, eleventh Earl of Buchan. He was intended for public life, but shortly after his succeeding to the family honours, in 1767, he retired to Scotland, and devoted himself to Uterature. His principal works were, an Essay on the Lives of Fletcher of Saltoun and the poet Thomson, and a Life of Napier of Merchiston. He died at Dryburgh Abbey, in 1829, at the age of eighty-seven. — E. 1778. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 29 for the honour of your letter, and for your goodness in remem bering an old man, who must with reason consider himself as forgotten, when he never was of importance, and is now al most useless to himself. Frequent severe fits of the gout have a good deal disabled me from pursuing the trifling stu dies in which I could pretend to know anything; or at least have given me an indifference, that makes me less ready in answering questions than I may have been formerly ; and as my papers are in the country, whither at present I am not able to go, I fear I can give but unsatisfactory replies to your lordship's queries. The two very curious pictures of King James and his Queen (I cannot recollect whether the third or fourth of the name, but I know that she was a princess of Sweden or Den mark,^ and that her arms are on her portrait,) were at the palace at Kensington, and I imagine are there still. I had obtained leave from the Lord Chamberlain to have drawings made of them, and Mr. Wale actually began them for me ; but he made such slow progress, and I was so called off from the thought of them by indispositions and other avocations, that they were never finished ; and Mr. Wale may, perhaps, still have the beginnings he made. At the Duke of Devonshire's at Hardwicke, there is a valuable though poorly painted picture of James V. and Mary of Guise, his second queen : it is remarkable from the great resemblance of Mary Queen of Scots to her father ; I mean in Lord Morton's picture of her, and in the image of her on her tomb at Westminster, which agree together, and which I take to be the genuine likeness. I have doubts on Lord Burling ton's picture, and on Dr. Mead's. The nose in both is thicker, and also fuller at bottom than on the tomb; though it is a Uttle supported by her coins. There is a much finer portrait — indeed, an excellent head, — of the Lady Margaret Douglas at Mr. Carteret's at Hawnes in Bedfordshire, the late Lord Granville's. It is a very ' James the First married, in 1590, Anne, daughter of Frederick King of Denmark. — E. 30 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1778. shrewd countenance, and at the same time with great good ness of character. Lord Scarborough has a good picture, in the style of Holbein at least, of Queen Margaret Tudor, daughter of Henry VII, and of her second or third husband (for, if I don't mistake, she had three) ; but indeed, my lord, these things are so much out of my memory at present, that I speak with great diffidence. I cannot even recollect anything else to your lordship's purpose; but I flatter myself, that these imperfect notices will at least be a testimony of my readiness to obey your lordship's commands, as that I am, with great respect, my lord, your lordship's obedient humble servant. TO EDWARD GIBBON, ESQ.' DEAR SIR, L ¦-' I HAVE gone through your Inquisitor's attack,* and am far from being clear that it deserves your giving yourself the trouble of an answer, as neither the detail nor the result affects your argument. So far from it, many of his reproofs are levelled at your having quoted a wrong page ; he confess ing often that what you have cited is in the author referred to, but not precisely in the individual spot. If St. Peter is attended by a corrector of the press, you will certainly never be admitted where he is a porter. I send you my copy, be cause I scribbled my remarks. I do not send them with the impertinent presumption of suggesting a hint to you, but to prove I did not grudge the trouble of going through such a book when you desired it, and to show how httle struck me as of any weight. ' Now first coUected. ' " An Examination of the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Chapters of Mr. Gibbon's History of the DecUne and FaU of the Roman Empire. By Henry Edward Davis, B.A. of BaUol CoUege, Oxford." He was" born in 1756, and died in 1784, at the early age of twenty-seven. He was a native of Windsor, and is believed to have received a present from George the Third for this production. — E. 1778. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 31 I have set down nothing on your imputed plagiarisms ; for, if they are so, no argument that has ever been employed must be used again, even where the passage necessary is ap plied to a different purpose. An author is not allowed to be master of his own works ; but, by Davis's new law, the first person that cites him would be so. You probably looked into Middleton, Dodwell, &c, ; had the same reflections on the same circumstances, or conceived them so as to recollect them, without remembering what suggested them. Is this plagia rism? If it is, Davis and such cavillers might go a short step further, and insist that an author should peruse every work antecedently written on every subject at all collateral to his ovra, — not to assist him, but to be sure to avoid every material touched by his predecessors. I will make but one remark on such divine champions. Davis and his prototypes tell you Middleton, &c. have used the same objections, and they have been confuted: answer ing, in the theologic dictionary, signifying confuting ; no mat ter whether there is sense, argument, truth, in the answer or not. Upon the whole, I think ridicule is the only answer such a work iso entitled to. The ablest answer which you can make (which would be the ablest answer that could be made) would never have any authority with the cabal, yet would allow a sort of dignity to the author. His patrons will always main tain that he vanquished you, unless you made him too ridicu lous for them to dare to revive his name. You might divert yourself, too, with Alma Mater, the church, employing a gmgat to defend the citadel, while the generals repose in their tents. If Irenseus, St. Augustine, &c. did not set appren tices and proselytes to combat Celsus and the adversaries of the new religion but early bishops had not five or six thousand pounds a-year. In short, dear Sir, I wish you not to lose your time ; that is, either not reply, or set your mark on your answer, that it may always be read with the rest of your works. 32 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Strawberry HiU, Jan. 3, 1779. At last, after ten weeks, I have been able to remove hither, in hopes change of air and the frost will assist my recovery ; though I am not one of those ancients that forget the register, and think they are to be as well as ever after every fit of illness. As yet I can barely creep about the room in the middle of the day. I have made my printer (now my secretary) copy out the rest of Mr. Baker's Life ; for my own hand will barely serve to write necessary letters, and complains even of them. If you know of any very trusty person passing between London and Cambridge, I would send it to you, but should not care to trust it by the coach, nor to any giddy undergraduate that comes to town to see a play; and, besides, I mean to return you your own notes. I will say no more than I have said in my apology to you for the manner in which I have written this life. With regard to Mr. Baker himself, I am confident you will find that I have done full justice»to his work and character. I do not expect you to approve the in ferences I draw against some other persons; and yet, if his conduct was meritorious, it would not be easy to excuse those who were active after doing what he would not do. You will not understand this sentence till you have seen the Life. I hope you have not been untiled or unpaled by the tempest on New-year's morning.' I have lost two beautiful elms in a row before my windows here, and had the skyhght demo lished in town. Lady Pomfret's Gothic house in my street lost one of the stone towers, like those at King's Chapel, and it was beaten through the roof. The top of our cross, too, at Ampthill was thrown down, as I hear from Lady Ossory this morning. I remember to have been told that Bishop Kidder ' On the morning of the 1st of January 1779, London was visited by one of the most violent tempests ever known. Scarcely a public build ing in the metropolis escaped without damage. — E. 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 33 and his wife were killed in their bed in the palace of Glou cester in 1709,' and yet his heirs were sued for dilapidations. Lord de Ferrers,^ who deserves his ancient honours, is going to repair the castle at Tamworth, and has flattered me that he will consult me. He has a violent passion for ancestry — and, consequently, I trust will not stake the patrimony of the Ferrarii, Townshends, and Comptons, at the hazard-table. A little pride would not hurt our nobility, cock and hen. Adieu, dear Sir ; send me a good account of yourself. Yours ever. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Arlington Street, Jan. 9, 1779. Your flight to Bath would have much surprised me, if Mr. Churchill, who, I think, heard it from Stanley, had not prepared me for it. Since you was amused, I am glad you went, especially as you escaped being initiated in Mrs. Miller's follies at Batheaston,' which you would have men tioned. She would certainly have sent some trapes of a Muse to press you, had she known what good epigrams you write. I went to Strawberry partly out of prudence, partly from ennui. I thought it best to air myself before I go in and out of hot rooms here, and had my house thoroughly warmed for a week previously, and then only stirred from the red room to the blue on the same floor. I stayed five days, and was neither the better nor the worse for it. I was quite tired with having neither company, books, nor amusement of any kind. Either from the emptiness of the town, or ¦ The memorable storm here aUuded to took place in November 1703, and Bishop Kidder and his lady perished in their bed at the episcopal palace at Wells by the faU of a stack of chimneys. They were privately interred in the cathedral; and one of his daughters, dying single, di rected by her wiU a monument to be erected for her parents. — E. '¦' Robert, sixth Earl Ferrers. He had just succeeded to the title, by the death of his brother Washington, vice-admiral of the blue ; who had begun to rebuild the mansion of Stanton-Harold, in Leicestershire, according to a plan of his own, and lived to see it nearly finished. — E. » See vol. V. p. 406.— E. VOL. VI. D 34 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. that ten weeks of gout have worn out the patience of all my acquaintance, but I do not see three persons in three days. This gives me but an uncomfortable prospect for my latter days : it is but probable that I may be a cripple in a fit or two more, if I have strength to go through them; and as that will be long hfe, one outlives one's acquaintance. I cannot make new acquaintance, nor interest myself at all about the young, except those that belong to me ; nor does that go beyond contributing to their pleasures, without having much satisfaction in their conversation — But — one must take everything as it comes, and make the best of it. I have had a much happier life than I deserve, and than mil- hons that deserve better. I should be very weak if I could not bear the uncomfortableness of old age, when I can afford what comforts it is capable of. How many poor old people have none of them ! I am ashamed whenever I am peevish, and recollect that I have fire and servants to help me. I hear Admiral Keppel is in high spirits with the great respect and zeal expressed for him. In my own opinion, his constitution will not stand the struggle. I am very un easy too for the Duke of Richmond, who is at Portsmouth, and wiU be at least as much agitated. Sir William Meredith has written a large pamphlet, and a very good one. It is to show, that whenever the Grecian repubhcs taxed their dependents, the latter resisted, and shook off the yoke. He has printed but twelve copies : the Duke of Gloucester sent me one of them. There is an anec dote of my father, on the authority of old Jack White, which I doubt. It says, he would not go on with the excise scheme, though his friends advised it. I cannot speak to the par ticular event, as I was then at school ; but it was more like him to have yielded, against his sentiments, to Mr. Pelham and his candid — or say, plausible and timid friends. I have heard him say, that he never did give up his opinion to such men but he always repented it. However, the anecdote in the book would be more to his honour. But what a strange man is Sir WilUam ! I suppose, now he has written thip 1779. THE HON, HORACE WALPOLE. 35 book, he will change his opinion, and again be for carrying on the war — or, if he does not know his own mind for two years together, why will he take places, to make everybody doubt his honesty ? TO THE REV. MR. COLE. January 15, 1779. I SEND you by Dr. Jacob, as you desired, my life of Mr. Baker, and with it your own materials. I beg you will communicate my manuscript to nobody, but if you think it worth your trouble I will consent to your transcribing it ; but on one condition, and a silly one for me to exact, who am as old as you, and broken to pieces, and very unlikely to sur vive you; but, should so improbable a thing happen, I must exact that you will keep your transcript sealed up, with orders written on the cover to be restored to me in case of an accident, for I should certainly dishke very much to see it printed without my consent. I should not think of your copying it, if you did not love to transcribe, and sometimes things of as little value as my manuscript I shall beg to have it returned to me by a safe hand as soon as you can, for I have nothing but the foul copy which nobody can read, I believe, but I and my secre tary. I am actually printing my justification about Chatterton, but only two hundred copies to give away ; for I hate calling in the whole town to a fray, of which otherwise probably not one thousand persons would ever hear. You shall have a copy as soon as ever it is finished, which my printer says wiU be in three weeks. You know my printer is my secretary too : do not imagine I am giving myself airs of a numerous household of officers. I shall be glad to see the letter of Mr. Baker you mentioned. You will perceive two or three notes in my manuscript in a different hand from mine, or that of my amanuensis (still the same officer) : they were added by a person I lent it to, and I have effaced part of the last. D 2 36 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. I must finish, lest Dr. Jacob should call, and my parcel not be ready. I hope your sore throat is gone ; my gout has returned again a httle with taking the air only, but did not stay — however, I am still confined, and almost ready to remain so, to prevent disappointment Yours most sincerely. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. ArUngton Street, Jan. 28, 1779. I WRITE in as much hurry as you did, dear Sir, and thank you for the motive of yours : mine is to prevent your fatiguing yourself in copying my manuscript, for which I am not in the least haste : pray keep it tiU another safe convey ance presents itself. You may bring the gout, that is, I am sorry to hear, flying about you, into your hand by weary ing it. How can you tell me I may well be cautious about my ma nuscript and yet advise me to print it? — No — I shall not provoke nests of hornets, till I am dust, as they will be too. If I dictated tales when ill in my bed, I must have been worse than I thought; for, as I know nothing of it, I must have been hght-headed. Mr. Lort was certainly misinformed^ though he seems to have told you the story kindly to the honour of my philosophy or spirits — but I had rather have no fame than what I do not deserve. I am fretful or low-spirited at times in the gout, hke other weak old men, and have less to boast than most men. I have some strange things in my drawer, even wilder than the Castle of Otranto, and called Hieroglyphic Tales; but they were not written lately, nor in the gout, nor, whatever they may seem, written when I was out of my senses. I showed one or two of them to a person since my recovery, who may have mentioned them, and occasioned Mr. Lort's misintel- ligence. I did not at all perceive that the latter looked ill ; and hope he is quite recovered. You shall see Chatterton soon. Adieu ! 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 37 TO THE REV. MR. COLE. February 4, 1779. I HAVE received the manuscript, and though you forbid my naming the subject more, I love truth, and truth in a friend so much, that I must tell you, that so far from taking your sincerity ill, I had much rather you should act with your native honest sincerity than say you was pleased with my manu script. I have always tried as much as is in human nature to divest myself of the self-love of an author ; in the present case I had less difficulty than ever, for I never thought my Life of Mr. Baker one of my least indifferent works. You might, believe me, have sent me your long letter ; whatever it contained, it would not have made a momentary cloud between us. I have not only friendship, but great gratitude for you, for a thousand instances of kindness ; and should detest any writing of mine that made a breach with a friend, and still more, if it could make me forget obligations. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. February 18, 1779. I SENT you my Chattertoniad ' last week, in hopes it would sweeten your pouting; but I find it has not, or has mis carried ; for you have not acknowledged the receipt with your usual punctuality. Have you seen Hasted's new History of Kent ?2 I am sail ing through it, but am stopped every minute by careless mis takes. They tell me the author has good materials, but is very negligent, and so I perceive. He has not even given a list of monuments in the churches, which I do not remember ' " A Letter to the Editor of the MisceUanies of Thomas Chatterton." Strawberry HiU, 1779, 8vo.— E. ' " The History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent ; by Edward Hasted;" four volumes, foUo, 1778-1799." A second and improved edition, in twelve volumes, octavo, appeared in 1797-1801. Mr. Hasted died in 1812, at the age of eighty. — ^E. 38 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. in any history of a county ; but he is rich in pedigrees ; though I suppose they have many errors too, as I have found some in those I am acquainted vrith. It is unpardonable to be inaccurate in a work in which one nor expects nor demands anything but fidehty.' We have a great herald arising in a very noble race, Lord de Ferrers. I hope to make him a Gothic architect too, for he is going to repair Tamworth Castle, and flatters me that I shall give him sweet counsel. I enjoin him to kemellare. Adieu ! Yours ever. TO SIR DAVID DALRYMPLE.'' ArUngton Street, March 12, 1779. I HAVE received this moment from your bookseller, Sir, the valuable present of the second volume of your " Annals," and beg leave to return you my grateful thanks for so agree able a gift, of which I can only have taken a look enough to lament that you do not intend to continue the work. Repeated and severe attacks of the gout forbid my enter taining visions of pleasures to come ; but though I might not have the advantage of your labours. Sir, I wish too well to posterity not to be sorry that you check your hand. Lord Buchan did me the honour lately of consulting me on portraits of illustrious Scots. I recollect that there is at Windsor a very good portrait of your countryman Duns Scotus,^ whose name struck me on just turning over your ' In a memoir of himself, which he drew up for the Gentleman's Ma gazine, to be pubUshed after his death, he says, " his laborious History of Kent took him up more than forty years ; during the whole series of which he spared neither pains nor expense to bring it to maturity." E. ' Now first coUected. ' Granger considers the portrait at Windsor not to be genuine. Of Duns Scotus, he says, " It requires one-half of a man's life to read the works of this profound doctor, and the other to understand his subtleties. His printed works are in twelve volumes, in folio ! His manuscripts are sleeping in Merton College, Oxford. Voluminous works frequently arise from the ignorance and confused ideas of the authors : if angels says Mr. Norris, were writers, we should have few foUos. He was the 'head of the sect of schoolmen called Scotists. — He died in 1308." E. 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. S9 volume. A good print was made from that picture some years ago, but I believe it is now very scarce: as it is not worth while to trouble his lordship with another letter for that purpose only, may I take the liberty. Sir, of begging you to mention it to his lordship ? TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Strawberry HUl, March 28, 1779. Your last called for no answer; and I have so httle to tell you, that I only write to-day to avoid the air of remiss ness. I came hither on Friday, for this last week has been too hot to stay in London ; but March is arrived this morn ing with his north-easterly malice, and I suppose will assert his old-style claim to the third of April. The poor infant apricots will be the victim to that Herod of the almanack. I have been much amused with new travels through Spain by a Mr. Swinburne' — at least with the Alhambra, of the inner parts of which there are two beautiful prints. The Moors were the most polished,'and had most taste of any people in the Gothic ages; and I hate the knave Ferdinand and his bigoted Queen for destroying them. These new travels are simple, and do tell you a httle more than late voyagers, by whose accounts one would think there was nothing in Spain but miileteers and fandangos. In truth there does not seem to be much worth seeing but prospects ; and those, unless I were a bird, I would never visit, when the accommodations are so wretched. Mr. Cumberland has given the town a masque, called ' "Travels through Spain in the Years 1775 and 1776 ; in which seve ral Monuments of Roman and Moorish Architecture are iUustrated by accurate Drawings taken on the spot. By Henry Swinburne." London, 1779, 4to. Mr. Swinburne also pubUshed, in 1783-5, his " Travels in the Two SiciUes during the Years 1777-8-9, and 1780." This celebrated traveller was the youngest son of Sir John Swinburne, of Capheaton, Northumberland ; the long- established seat of that ancient Roman Ca tholic family. Pecuniary embarrassments, arising from the marriage of his daughter to Paul Benfield, Esq. and consequent involvement in the misfortunes of that adventurer, induced him to obtain a place in the newly-ceded settlement of Trinidad, where he died in 1803. — E. 40 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. Calypso,' which is a prodigy of dulness. Would you beheve, that such a sentimental writer would be so gross as to make cantharides one of the ingredients of a love-potion for en amouring Telemachus? If you think I exaggerate, here are the lines : " To these, the hot Hispanian fly Shall bid his languid pulse beat high." Proteus and Antiope are Minerva's missioners for securing the prince's virtue, and in recompense they are married and crowned king and queen ! I have bought at Hudson's sale a fine design of a chimney- piece, by Holbein, for Henry VIII. If I had a room left, I would erect It is certainly not so Gothic as that in my Holbein room ; but there is a great deal of taste for that bas tard style ; perhaps it was executed at Nonsuch. I do intend under Mr. Essex's inspection, to begin my offices next spring. It is late in my day, I confess, to return to brick and mortar ; but I shall be glad to perfect my plan, or the next possessor will marry my castle to a Doric stable. There is a perspec tive through two or three rooms in the Alhambra, that might easily be improved into Gothic, though there seems but small affinity between them ; and they might be finished within with Dutch tiles, and painting, or bits of ordinary marble, as there must be gilding. Mosaic seems to be their chief ornaments, for walls, ceilings, and floors. Fancy must sport in the furni ture, and mottos might be gallant, and would be very Arab esque, I would have a mixture of colours, but with a strict attention to harmony and taste; and some one should pre- dominatei as supposing it the favourite colour of the lady who was sovereign of the knight's affections who built the house. Carpets are classically Mahometans, and fountains — but, alas 1 our climate till last summer was never romantic ! Were I not so old, I would at least build a Moorish novel — for you see my head runs on Granada — and by taking the ¦ " Calypso" was brought out at Covent-Garden theatre, but was per formed only a few nights. It was imprudently ushered in by a prelude in which the author treated the newspaper editors as a set of unprin cipled feUows. — E. 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 41 most picturesque parts of the Mahometan and Catholic re ligions, and with the mixture of African and Spanish names, one might make something very agreeable — at least I will not give the hint to Mr. Cumberland. Adieu ! Yours ever. TO EDWARD GIBBON, ESQ.' [1779.] The penetration, solidity, and taste, that made you the first of historians, dear Sir, prevent my being surprised at your being the best writer of controversial pamphlets too.^ I have read you with more precipitation than such a work deserved, but I could not disobey you and detain it. Yet even in that hurry I could discern, besides a thousand beau ties and strokes of wit, the inimitable eighty-third page, and the conscious dignity that you maintain throughout, over your monkish antagonists. When you are so superior in argument, it would look like insensibility to the power of your reasoning, to select transient passages for commen dation; and yet I must mention one that pleased me par ticularly, from the delicacy of the severity, and from its novelty too ; it is, bold is not the word. This is the feathered arrow of Cupid, that is more formidable than the club of Hercules. I need not specify thanks, when I prove how much I have been pleased. Your most obliged. ' Now first collected. '' Gibbon's celebrated " Vindication " of the Fifteenth and- Sixteenth Chapters of his History appeared early in the year 1779. " I adhered," he says, in his Memoirs, " to the wise resolution of trusting myself and my writings to the candour of the public, tiU Mr. Davis of Oxford pre sumed to attack, not the faith, but the fidelity of the historian. My Vindication, expressive of less anger than contempt, amused for a mo ment the busy and idle metropolis ; and the most rational part of the laity, and even of the clergy, appear to have been satisfied of my inno cence and accuracy. I would not print it in quarto, lest it should be bound and preserved with the History itself. At the distance of twelve years, I calmly affirm my judgment of Davis, Chelsum, &c. A victory Over such antagonists was a sufficient humiUation. They, however, were rewarded in this world. Poor Chelsum was, indeed, neglected ; and I dare not boast the making Dr. Watson a bishop : he is a prelate of a large mind and a liberal spirit : but I enjoyed the pleasure of giving a royal pension to Mr. Davis, and of coUating Dr. Althorpe to an archi- episcopal living." — E. 42 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. ArUngton Street, AprU 12, 1779. As your gout was so concise, I will not condole on it, but I am sorry you are liable to it if you do but take the air. Thank you for telling me of the vendible curiosities at the Al derman's. For St Peter's portrait to hang to a fairie's watch, I shall not think of it, both as I do not believe it very like, and as it is composed of invisible writing, for which my eyes are not young enough. In truth, I have almost left off making purchases; I have neither room for anything more, nor in clination for them, as I reckon everything very dear when one has so httle time to enjoy it However, I cannot say but the plates by Rubens do tempt me a little — yet, as I do not care to buy even Rubens in a poke, I should wish to know if the Alderman would let me see if it were but one. Would he be persuaded? I would pay for the carriage, though I should not buy them. Lord de Ferrers will be infinitely happy with the sight of the pedigree, and I will certainly tell him of it, and how kind you are. Strype's account, or rather Stow's, of Richard's person is very remarkable — but I have done with endeavouring at truth. Weeds grow more naturally than what one plants. I hear your Cantabrigians are stiU unshaken Chattertonians. Many men are about falsehood like girls about the first man that makes love to them : a handsomer, a richer, or even a sincerer lover cannot eradicate the first impression but a silher swain, or a sihier legend, sometimes gets into the head of the miss or the learned man, and displaces the antecedent folly. Truth's kingdom is not of this world. I do not know whether our clergy are growing Mahometans or not: they certainly are not what they profess themselves but as you and I should not agree perhaps in assigning the same defects to them, I wiU not enter on a subject which I have promised you to drop. All I ahude to now is, the 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 43 shocking murder of Miss Ray' by a divine. In my own opinion, we are growing more fit for Bedlam than for Ma homet's paradise. The poor criminal in question, I am per suaded, is mad — and the misfortune is, the law does not know how to define the shades of madness ; and thus there are twenty outpensioners of Bedlam, for one that is confined. You, dear Sir, have chosen a wiser path to happiness by de pending on yourself for amusement. Books and past ages draw one into no scrapes, and perhaps it is best not to know much of men till they are dead. I wish you health — you want nothing else. I am, dear Sir, yours most truly. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Arlington Street, AprU 20, 1779. DEAR SIR, I HAVE received the plates very safely, but hope you nor the Alderman* will take it ill that I return them. They are extremely pretty, and uncommonly well preserved ; but I am sure they are not by Rubens, nor I believe after his designs, for I am persuaded they are older than his time. In truth, I have a great many of the same sort, and do not wish for more. I shall send them back on Thursday by the Fly, and will beg you to inquire after them; and I trust they will arrive as safely as they did to Yours ever. " On the 7th of AprU, Miss Reay, who had been the mistress of Lord Sandwich for twenty years, by whom she was the mother of many chil dren, was shot, on her leaving Covent-Garden theatre, by the Rev. James Hackman, who had the living of Wiverton, in Norfolk ; a young man not half her age, who had imbibed a violent passion for her, whom he first met at Lord Sandwich's seat at Hinchinbroke, where he had been frequently invited to dine while commanding a recruiting party at Huntingdon ; he being, previously to his entering the church, a Ueute nant in the 68th regiment of foot. Having shot Miss Reay, he fired a pistol at himself ; but, being only wounded by it, he was tried at the Old Bailey for murder, convicted, and executed. — E. " Alderman John Boydell, an English engraver ; distinguished as an encourager of the fine arts. In 1790 he held the office of Lord Mayor of London, and died in 1804. — £. 44 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. AprU 23, 1779. I OUGHT not to trouble you so often when you are not -well ; but that is the very cause of my writing now. You left off abruptly from disorder, and therefore I wish to know it is gone. The plates I hope got home safe. They are pretty, especially the reverses ; but the drawing in general is bad. Pray tell me what you mean by a priced catalogue of the pictures at Houghton. Is it a printed one ? if it is, where is it to be had ? — odd questions from me, and which I should not wish to have mentioned as coming from me. I have been told to-day that they are actually sold to the Czarina — sic transit ! mortifying enough, were not everything transitory ! we must recollect that our griefs and pains are so, as well as our joys and glories ; and, by balancing the account, a grain of comfort is to be extracted. Adieu ! I shall be heartily glad to receive a better account of you. TO MRS. ABINGTON.' [1779.] Mr. Walpole cannot express how much he is mortified that he cannot accept of Mrs. Abington's obliging invitation, as he had engaged company to dine with him on Sunday at Strawberry-hill; whom he would put off, if not foreigners who are leaving England. Mr. Walpole hopes, however, that this accident will not prevent an acquaintance, which his admiration of Mrs. Abington's genius has made him long desire ; and which he hopes to cultivate at Strawberry-hill, when her leisure will give him leave to trouble her with an invitation. ' Now first coUected. 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 45 TO THE REV. MR. COLE. ArUngton Street, May 21, 1779. As Mr. Essex has told me that you still continue out of order, I am impatient to hear from yourself how you are. Do send me a line : I hope it will be a satisfactory one. Do you know that Dr. Ducarel has published a translation of a History of the Abbey of Bee ? There is a pretty print to it: and one very curious circumstance, at least valuable to us disciples of Alma Mater Etonensis. The ram-hunting was derived from the manor of Wrotham in Norfolk, which formerly belonged to Bee, and being forfeited, together with other ahen . priories, was bestowed by Henry VI. on our college. I do not repine at reading any book from which I can learn a single fact that I wish to know. For the lives of the abbots, they were, according to the author, all pinks of piety and hohness — but there are few other facts amusing, especially with re gard to the customs of those savage times — excepting that the Empress Matilda was buried in a bull's hide, and after wards had a tomb covered with silver. There is another new book called " Sketches from Nature," in two volumes, by Mr. G. Keate, in which I found one fact too, that, if authentic, is worth knowing. The work is an imitation of Sterne, and has a sort of merit, though nothing that arrives at originality. For the foundation of the church of Reculver, he quotes a manuscript said to be written by a Dominican friar of Canter bury, and preserved at Louvain. The story is evidently meta morphosed into a novel, and has very little of an antique air; but it affirms that the monkish author attests the beauty of Richard III. This is very absurd, if invention has nothing to do with the story; and therefore one should suppose it ge nuine. I have desired Dodsley to ask Mr. Keate, if there truly exists such a manuscript : if there does, I own I wish he had printed it rather than his own production; for I agree with Mr. Gray, " that any man living may make a book worth reading, if he will but set down with truth what he has seen or heard, no matter whether the book is well written or not." Let those who can't write, glean. 46 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Arlington Street, May 22, 1779. If you hear of us no oftener than we of you, you will be as much behindhand in news as my Lady Lyttelton. We have seen a traveller that saw you in your island,' but it sounds Uke hearing of Ulysses. Well ! we must be content. You are not only not dethroned, but owe the safety of your domi nions to your own skill in fortification. If we do not hear of your extending your conquests, why, is it not less than all our modem heroes have done, whom prophets have foretold and gazettes celebrated — or who have foretold and celebrated them selves. Pray be content to be cooped up in an island that has no neighbours, when the Howes and Clintons and Dun- mores and Burgoynes and Campbells are not yet got beyond the great river — Inquiry!" To-day's papers say, that the little Prince of Orange ^ is to invade you again ; but we trust Sir James Wallace has chpped his wings so close, that they will not grow again this season, though he is so ready to fly. Nothing material has happened since I wrote last — so, as every moment of a civil war is precious, every one has been turned to the interest of diversion. There have been three masquerades, an installation, and the ball of the knights at the Haymarket this week ; not to mention Almack's festino. Lady Spencer's, Ranelagh and Vauxhall, operas and plays. The Duchess of Bolton too saw masks — so many, that the floor gave way, and the company in the dining-room were near fall ing on the heads of those in the parlour, and exhibiting all that has not yet appeared in Doctors' Commons. At the knights' ball was such a profusion of strawberries, that people ' Mr. Conway was now at his government of Jersey. ' The parUamentary inquiry which took place in the House of Com mons on the conduct of the American war. ' The Prince of Nassau, who had commanded the attack upon Jersey, claiming relationship to the great house of Nassau, Mr. Walpole eaUs him the " little Prince of Orange." Gibbon, in a letter to Mr. Holroyd, of the 7th, says, " You_ have heard of the Jersey invasion ; everybody praises Arbuthnot's decided spirit. Conway went last night to throw himself into the island." — E. 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 47 could hardly get into the supper-room. I could tell you more, but I do not love to exaggerate. Lady Ailesbury told me this morning that Lord Bristol has got a calf with two feet to each leg — I am convinced it is by the Duchess of Kingston, who has two of every thing where others have but one.' Adieu ! — I am going to sup with Mrs. Abington — and hope Mrs. Clive vrill not hear of it> TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Strawberry HiU, June 2, 1779. I AM most sincerely rejoiced, dear Sir, that you find yourself at all better, and trust it is an omen of farther amendment. Mr. Essex surprised me by telling me, that you, who keep yourself so warm and so numerously clothed, do yet sometimes, if the sun shines, sit and write in your garden for hours at a time. It is more than I should readily do, whose habitudes are so very different from yours. Your complaints seem to demand perspiration — but I do not venture to advise. I understand no constitution but my own, and should kill Milo, if I managed him as I treat myself. I sat in a win dow on Saturday, with the east wind blowing on my neck till near two in the morning — and it seems to have done me good, for I am better within these two days than I have been these six months. My spirits have been depressed, and my nerves so aspen, that the smallest noise disturbed me. To day I do not feel a complaint; which is something at near sixty-two. I don't know whether I have not misinformed you, nor am sure it was Dr. Ducarel who translated the account of the Abbey of Bee — he gave it to Mr. Lort; but I am not certain he ever published it. You was the first that notified to me the fifth volume of the Archaeologia — I am not much more edified than usual; but there are three pretty prints of Re- ' " Do you know, my lord," said the Duchess, then Miss Chudleigh, to Lord Chesterfield, " the world says I have had twins ! " — " Does it ? " said his lordship ; " I make a point of beUeving only one-half of what it s."— E. 48 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. ginal Seals. Mr. Pegge's tedious dissertation, which he calls a brief one, about the foohsh legend of St George, is despi cable : all his arguments are equally good for proving the ex istence of the dragon. What diversion might laughers make of the society ! Dolly Pentraeth, the old woman of Mouse- hole, and Mr. Penneck's nurse, p. 81, would have furnished Foote with two personages for a farce. The same grave dis sertation on patriarchal customs seems to have as much to do with British antiquities, as the Lapland witches that sell wind — and pray what business has the society with Roman inscriptions in Dalmatia! I am most pleased with the ac count of Nonsuch, imperfect as it is : it appears to have been but a villa, and not considerable for a royal one. You see lilacs were then a novelty. — WeU, I am glad they pubhsh away. The vanity of figuring in these repositories will make many persons contribute their manuscripts, and every now and then something valuable will come to light, which its own intrinsic merit might not have saved. I know nothing more of Houghton. I should certainly be glad to have the priced catalogue; and if you will lend me yours, my printer shall transcribe it — but I am in no hurry. I conceive faint hopes, as the sale is not concluded : however, I take care not to flatter myself. I think I told you I had purchased, at Mr. Ives's sale, a handsome coat in painted glass, of Hobart impaling Boleyn — but I can find no such match in my pedigree — yet I have heard that Blickling belonged to Ann Boleyn's father. Pray reconcile all this to me. Lord de Ferrers is to dine here on Saturday ; and I have got to treat him with an account of ancient painting, formerly in the hall of Tamworth Castle ; they are mentioned in War- ton's Observations on the Fairy Queen, vol. i. p. 43. Do not put yourself to pain to answer this — only be as sured I shall be happy to know when you are able to write with ease. You must leave your cloister, if your transcribing leaves you. Believe me, dear Sir, Ever most truly. 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 49 TO THE REV. DR. LORT. Strawberry HiU, June 4, 1779. I AM sorry, dear Sir, you could not let me have the plea sure of your company; but, I own, you have partly, not en tirely, made me amends by the sight of your curious ma nuscript, which I return you, with your other book of inaugu rations. The sight of the manuscript was particularly welcome to me, because the long visit of Henry VI. and his uncle Glou cester, to St Edmund's Bury, accounts for those rare altar tablets that I bought at Mr. Ives's sale, on which are incon- testably the portraits of Duke Humphrey, Cardinal Beaufort and the same archbishop that is in my Marriage of Henry VI. I know the house of Lancaster were patrons of St. Edmund's Bury ; but so long a visit is demonstration. The fourth person on my pannels is unknown. Over his head is a coat of arms. It may be that of W. Curteys the abbot, or the alderman, as he is in scarlet. His figure and the Duke's are far superior to the other two, and worthy of a good Italian master. The Cardinal and the Archbishop are in the dry hard manner of the age. I wish you would call and look at them ; they are at Mr. Bonus's in Oxford-road ; the two prelates are much damaged. I peremptorily enjoined Bonus to repair only, and not repaint them ; and thus, by put ting him out of his way, I have put him so much out of humour too, that he has kept them these two years, and not finished them yet. I design them for the four void spaces in my chapel, on the sides of the shrine. The Duke of Glou cester's face is so like, though younger, that it proves I guessed right at his figure in my Marriage. The tablets came out of the abbey of Bury ; were procured by old Peter Le Neve, Norroy ; and came by his widow's marriage to Tom Martin, at whose sale Mr. Ives bought them. We have very few princely portraits so ancient, so authentic, and none so well painted as the Duke and fourth person. These were the insides of the doors, which I had split into two, and value them extremely. VOL. VI. E 50 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. This account I think will be more satisfactory to you than notes. Pray tell me how you hke the pictures when you have ex amined them. I shall search in Edmondson's new Vocabu lary of Arms for the coat which contains three bulls' heads on six pieces ; but the colours are either white and black, or the latter is become so by time.. I hope you are not going out of town yet ; I shaU probably be there some day in next week. I see advertized a book something in the way of your inau gurations, caUed Le Costume; do you know anything of it? Can you teh me who is the author of the Second Anticipation on the Exhibition ? Is not it Barry the painter ? TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry HUl, Saturday, June 5, 1779. I WRITE to you more seldom than I am disposed to do, from having nothing positive to tell you, and from being un willing to say and unsay every minute something that is re ported positively. The confident assertions of the victory over D'Estaing are totally vanished — and they who invented them, now declaim as bitterly against Byron, as if he had de ceived them — and as they did against Keppel. This day se'nnight there was a great alarm about Ireland — which was far from being all invention, though not an absolute insurrec tion, as was said. The case, I believe, was this : — The court in order to break the volunteer army established by the Irish themselves, endeavoured to persuade a body in Lady Blayney's county of Monaghan to enlist in the militia — which they took indignantly. They said, they had great regard for Lady Blayney and Lord Clermont; but to act under them, would be acting under the King, and that was by no means their intention. There have since been motions for inquiries what steps the ministers have taken to satisfy the Irish — and these they have imprudently rejected — which will not tend to pacification. The ministers have been pushed too on the article of Spain, and could not deny that all negotiation is at 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 51 an end — though they will not own farther. However, the Spanish ambassador is much out of humour. From Paris they write confidently of 'the approaching declaration ; ' and Lord Sandwich, I hear, has said in a very mixed company, that it was folly not to expect it. There is another million asked, and given on a vote of credit; and Lord North has boasted of such mines for next year, that one would think he believed next year would never come. The Inquiry^ goes on, and Lord Harrington did himself and Burgoyne honour. Barr6 and Governor Johnstone have had warm words,^ and Burke has been as frantic for the Roman Catholics as Lord George Gordon against them. The Par liament, it is said, is to rise on the 21st You will not collect from all this that our prospect clears up. I fear , there is not more discretion in the treatment of Ireland than of America. The court seems to be infatuated, and to think that nothing is of any consequence but a ma jority in Parliament — though they have totally lost all power but that of provoking. Fortunate it had been for the King and kingdom, had the court had no majority for these six years ! America had still been ours ! — and all the lives and all the milhons we have squandered ! A majority that has lost thirteen provinces by bullying and vapouring, and the most childish menaces, will be a brave countermatch for France and Spain, and a rebellion in Ireland ! In short, it is plain that there is nothing a raajorityin Parliament can do, but outvote a minority ; and yet by their own accounts one would think they could not do even that. I saw a paper t'other day that began with this Iriscism, " As the minority have lost us thir teen provinces," &c. I know nothing the minority have done, or been suffered to do, but restore the Roman Catholic re hgion — and that too was by the desire of the court ' On the breaking out of the war between this country and America, Spain had offered to mediate between them ; but, receiving a refusal, she at once declared herself a principal in the war, and ready to fulfil the terms of the family compact. — E. ' The Inquiry into the Conduct of the American war. ' In the course of a debate in the House of Commons, on the 3rd of June, Governor Johnstone told Colonel Barre, that he was making a E 2 52 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. This is however the present style. They announced with infinite applause a new production of Tickell: — it has ap peared, and is a most paltry performance. It is called the Cassette Verte of M. de Sartine, and pretends to be his cor respondence with the opposition. Nay, they are so pitifully mean as to laugh at Doctor Franklin, who has such thorough reason to sit and laugh at them. What triumph it must be to him to see a miserable pamphlet all the revenge they can take ! There is another, still duller, caUed Opposition Morn ings, in which you are lugged in. In truth, it is a compliment to any man to except him out of the number of those that have contributed to the shocking disgraces inflicted on this undone country ! When Lord Chatham was minister, he never replied to abuse but by a victory. I know no private news : I have been here ever since Tues day, enjoying my tranquillity, as much as an honest man can do who sees his country ruined. It is just such a period as makes philosophy wisdom. There are great moments when every man is called on to exert himself — but when folly, in fatuation, delusion, incapacity, and profligacy fling a nation away, and it concurs itself, and applauds its destroyers, a man who has lent no hand to the mischief, and can neither pre vent nor remedy the mass of evils, is fully justified in sit ting aloof and beholding the tempest rage, with silent scorn and indignant compassion. Nay, I have, I own, some comfort able reflections. I rejoice that there is still a great continent of Enghshmen who will remain free and independent, and who laugh at the impotent majorities of a prostitute Parliament I care not whether General Burgoyne and Governor Johnstone cross over and figure in, and support or oppose ; nor whether Mr. Burke, or the superior of the Jesuits, is high commissioner to the kirk of Scotland. My ideas are such as I have always had, and are too plain and simple to comprehend modern con fusions; and, therefore, they suit with those of few men. What will be the issue of this chaos, I know not, and, pro bably, shah not see. I do see with satisfaction, that what was scaramouch of himself. The Colonel got up to demand an explanation, but the Speaker put an end to the altercation. — E. 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 53 meditated has failed by the grossest folly ; and when one has escaped the worst, lesser evils must be endured with patience. After this dull effusion, I will divert you with a story that made me laugh this morning till I cried. You know my Swiss David, and his incomprehensible pronunciation. He came to me, and said, " Auh ! dar is Meses Ellis wants some of your large flags to put in her great O." With much ado, I found out that Mrs. Ellis had sent for leave to take up some flags out of my meadow for her grotto. I hope in a few days to see Lady Ailesbury and Miss Jennings here ; I have writ to propose it What are your in tentions .? Do you stay till you have made your island im pregnable ? I doubt it will be our only one that will be so. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry HiU, June 16, 1779. Your Countess was here last Thursday, and received a letter from you, that told us how slowly you receive ours. When you will receive this I cannot guess; but it dates a new era, which you with reason did not care to look at as possible. In a word, behold a Spanish war ! I must detail a httle to increase your wonder. I heard here the day be fore yesterday that it was likely ; and that night received a letter from Paris, telhng me (it was of the 6th) that Mon sieur de Beauveau was going, they knew not whither, at the head of twenty-five thousand men, with three lieutenant- generals and six or eight marechaux de camp under him. Yesterday I went to town, and Thomas Walpole happened to call on me. He, who used to be informed early, did not beheve a word either of a Spanish war or a French expe dition. I saw some other persons in the evening as ignorant At ni^ht I went to sup at Richmond-house. The Duke said the Brest fleet was certainly sailed, and had got the start of ours by twelve days; that Monsieur de Beauveau was on board with a large sum of money, and with white and red cockades ; and that there would certainly be a Spanish war. 54 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. He added, that the Opposition were then pressing in the House of Commons to have the Parhament continue sitting, and urging to know if we were not at the eve of a Spanish war; but the ministers persisted in the prorogation for to morrow or Friday, and would not answer on Spain. I said I would make you wonder — But no — Why should the Parhament continue to sit ? Are not the ministers and the Parliament the same thing? And how has either House shown that it has any talent for war ? The Duke of Richmond does n^t guess whither the Brest fleet is gone. He thinks, if to Ireland, we should have known it by this time. He has heard that the Prince of Beauveau has said he was going on an expedition that would be glorious in the eyes of posterity. I asked, if that might not mean Gibraltar ? The Duke doubts, but hopes it, as he thinks it no wise measure on their side ; yet he was very melancholy, as you will be, on this heavy accession to our distresses. Well ! here we are, aris et focis and all at stake ! What can we be meaning? Unable to conquer America before she was assisted — scarce able to keep France at bay — are we a match for both, and Spain too? What can be our view? nay, what can be our expectation? I sometimes think we reckon it will be more creditable to be forced by France and Spain to give up America, than to have the merit with the latter of doing it with grace. — But, as Cato says, " I 'm weary of conjectures — this must end them ; " that is, the sword: — and never, I believe, did a country plunge itself into such difficulties step by step, and for six years together, without once recollecting that each foreign war rendered the object of the civil war more unattainable ; and that in both the foreign wars we have not an object in prospect Unable to recruit our remnant of an army in America, are we to make conquests on France and Spain? They may choose their attacks : we can scarce choose what we will defend. 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 55 Ireland, they say, is more temperate than was expected. That is some consolation — yet many fear the Irish will be tempted to unite with America, which would throw all that trade into their convenient harbours : and I own I have ap prehensions that the Parliament's rising without taking a step in their favour may offend them. Surely at least we have courageous ministers. I thought my father a stout man : — he had not a tithe of their spirit. The town has wound up the season perfectly in character by a fete at the Pantheon by subscription. Le Texier man aged it; but it turned out sadly. The company was first shut into the galleries to look down on the supper, then let to descend to it. Afterwards they were led into the subterraneous apartment, which was laid with mould, and planted with trees, and crammed with nosegays: but the fresh earth, and the dead leaves, and the effluvia of breaths made such a stench and moisture, that they were suffocated ; and when they remounted, tbe legs and wings of chickens and remnants of ham (for the supper was not removed) poisoned them more. A druid in an arbour distributed verses to the ladies ; then the Baccelli' and the dancers of the Opera danced; and then danced the company; and then it being morning, and the candles burnt out, the windows were opened; and then the stewed-danced assembly were such shocking figures, that they fled like ghosts as they looked. — I suppose there will be no more balls unless the French land, and then we shall show we do not mind it Thus I have told you all I know. You will ponder over these things in your little distant island, when we have for gotten them. There is another person, one Doctor Franklin, who, I fancy, is not sorry that we divert ourselves so well. Yours ever. ¦ After the departure of MademoiseUe Heinel, no dancing so much delighted the frequenters of the Opera as that of MademoiseUe Baccelli and M. Vestris le jeune. — B. 56 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. TO THE HON. GEORGE HARDINGE.' Strawberry HiU, July 4, 1779. I HAVE now received the drawings of Grignan, and know not how to express my satisfaction and gratitude but by a silly witticism that is hke the studied quaintness of the last age. In short they are so much more beautiful than I ex pected, that I am not surprised at your having surprised me by exceeding even what I expected from your well-known kindness to me; they are charmingly executed, and with great taste. I own too that Grignan is grander, and in a much finer situation, than I had imagined; as I concluded that the witchery of Madame de Sevigne's ideas and style had spread the same leaf-gold over places with which she gilded her friends. All that has appeared of them since the publication of her letters has lowered them. A single letter of her daughter, that to Paulina, with a description of the Duchess of Bourbon's toilette, is worthy of the mother. Paulina's own letters contain not a little worth reading; one just divines that she might have written well if she had had anything to write about (which, however, would not have signified to her grandmother). Coulanges was a silly good-humoured glutton, that flattered a rich widow for her dinners. His wife was sensible, but dry, and rather peevish at growing old. Unluckily nothing more has come to light of Madame de Sevigne's son, whose short letters in the col lection I am almost profane enough to prefer to his mother's ; and which makes me astonished that she did not love his wit so unaffected, and so congenial to her own, in preference to the eccentric and sophisticated reveries of her sublime and ill-humoured daughter. Grignan alone maintains its dignity, > Son of Nicholas Hardinge, Esq. one of the joint secretaries of the treasury, and member for the borough of Eye. He was educated at Eton school, and finished his studies at Trinity College, Cambridge where Dr. Watson was his tutor. He was caUed to the bar' in 1769, and was subsequently appointed solicitor-general to the Queen. In 1787 he was made a Welsh judge, and died in 1816. In 1818, the works of this clever and eccentric scholar were pubUshed, with an account of his life by Mr. John Nichols.— E. ' 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 57 and shall be consecrated here among other monuments of that bewitching period, and amongst which one loves to lose oneself, and drink oblivion of an era so very unlike ; for the awkward bigots to despotism of our time have not Madame de Sevigne's address, nor can paint an Indian idol with an hundred hands as graceful as the Apollo of the Belvidere. When will you come and accept my thanks ? will Wednesday next suit you ? But do you know that I must ask you not to leave your gown behind you, which indeed I never knew you put on willingly, but to come in it I shall want your protection at Westminster Hall. Yours most cordially. TO THE COUNTESS OF AILESBURY. Saturday night, July 10, 1779. I COULD not thank your ladyship before the post went out to-day, as I was getting into my chaise to go and dine at Carshalton with my cousin Thomas Walpole when I re ceived your kind inquiry about my eye. It is quite well again, and I hope the next attack of the gout will be any where rather than in that quarter. I did not expect Mr. Conway would think of returning just now. As you have lost both Mrs. Damer and Lady WiUiam Campbell, I do not see why your ladyship should not go to Goodwood. The Baroness's increasing peevishness does not surprise me. When people will not weed their own minds, they are apt to' be overrun with nettles. She knows nothing of poli tics, and no wonder talks nonsense about them. It is silly to wish three nations had but one neck; but it is ten times more absurd to act as if it was so, which the government has done ; — ay, and forgetting, too, that it has not a scimitar large enough to sever that neck, which they have in effect made one. It is past the time. Madam, of making conjec tures. How can one guess whither France and Spain will di rect a blow that is in their option? I am rather inclined to think that they will have patience to ruin us in detail. 58 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. Hitherto France and America have carried their points by that manoeuvre. Should there be an engagement at sea, and the French and Spanish fleets, by their great superiority, have the advantage, one knows not what might happen. Yet though there are such large preparations making on the French coast I do not much expect a serious invasion, as they are sure they can do us more damage by a variety of other attacks, where we can make little resistance. Gibraltar and Jamaica can but be the immediate objects of Spain. Ire land is much worse guarded than this island: — nay, we must be undone by our expense, should the summer pass without any attempt. My cousin thinks they will try to destroy Ports mouth and Plymouth — but I have seen nothing in the pre sent French ministry that looks like bold enterprise. We are much more adventurous, that set everything to the hazard : but there are such numbers of baronesses that both talk and act with passion, that one would think the nation had lost its senses. Everything has miscarried that has been undertaken, and the worse we succeed, the more is risked ; — yet the na tion is not angry ! How can one conjecture during such a delirium ? I sometimes almost think I must be in the wrong to be of so contrary an opinion to most men — yet, when every misfortune that has happened had been foretold by a few, why should I not think I have been in the right? Has not almost every single event that has been announced as prosperous proved a gross falsehood, and often a silly one? Are we not at this moment assured that Washington cannot possibly amass an army of above 8000 men ! and yet Clinton, with 20,000 men, and with the hearts, as we are told, too, of three parts of the colonies, dares not show his teeth without the walls of New York? Can I be in the wrong in not be hoving what is so contradictory to my senses? We could not conquer America when it stood alone ; then France sup ported it and we did not mend the matter. To make it still easier, we have driven Spain into the alhance. Is this wis dom? Would it be presumption, even if one were single, to think that we must have the worst in such a contest ? Shall I be hke the mob, and expect to conquer France and Spain, 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 59 and then thunder upon America? Nay, but the higher mob do not expect such success. They would not be so angry at the house of Bourbon, if not morally certain that those kings destroy all our passionate desire and expectation of conquer ing America. We bullied, and threatened, and begged, and nothing would do. Yet independence was still the word. Now we rail at the two monarchs — and when they have banged us, we shall sue to them" as humbly as we did to the Congress. All this my senses, such as they are, tell me has been and will be the case. What is worse, all Europe is of the same opinion; and though forty thousand baronesses may be ever so angry, I venture to prophesy that we shall make but a very foolish figure whenever we are so lucky as to obtain a peace; and posterity, that may have prejudices of its own, will still take the liberty to pronounce, that its ancestors were a woful set of politicians from the year 1774 to — I wish I knew when. Jf I might advise, I would recommend Mr. Burrell to com mand the fieet in the room of Sir Charles Hardy. The .for tune of the Burrells is powerful enough to baffle calculation. Good -night. Madam ! P. S. I have not written to Mr. Conway since this day sevennight,. not having a teaspoonful of news to send him. I will beg your ladyship to tell him so. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Strawberry HiU, July 12, 1779. I AM concerned, dear Sir, that you gave yourself the trouble of transcribing the catalogue and prices, which I re ceived last night and for which I am exceedingly obliged to you. Partial as I am to the pictures at Houghton, I confess I think them much overvalued. My father's whole collection, of which alone he had preserved the prices, cost but 40,000Z. ; and after his death there were three sales of pictures, among which were all the whole-lengths of Vandyke but three, which had been sent to Houghton, but not fitting any of the spaces 60 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. left came back to town. Few of the rest sold were very fine, but no doubt Sir Robert had paid as dear for many of them; as purchasers are not perfect connoisseurs at first. Many of the valuations are not only exorbitant, but inju dicious. They who made the estimate seem to have considered the rarity of the hands more than the excellence. Three — The Magi's Offering, by Carlo Maratti, as it is called, and two, supposed Paul Veronese, — are very indifferent copies, and yet aU are roundly valued, and the first ridiculously. I do not doubt of another picture in the collection but the Last Supper, by Raphael, and yet this is set down at 500?. I miss three pictures, at least they are not set down, the Sir Thomas Whar ton, and Laud and Gibbons, The first is most capital ; yes, I recollect I have had some doubts on the Laud, though the University of Oxford once offered 400Z. for it — and if Queen Henrietta is by Vandyke, it is a very indifferent one. The affixing a higher value to the Pietro Cortona than to the oc tagon Guido is most absurd — I have often gazed on the lat ter,, and preferred it even to the Doctor's. In short, the appraisers were determined to see what the Czarina could give, rather than what the pictures were really worth — I am glad she seems to think so, for I hear no more of the sale — it is not very wise in me still to concern myself, at my age, about what I have so little interest in — it is still less wise to be anxious on trifles, when one's country is sinking. I do not know which is most mad, my nephew or our ministers — both the one and the other increase my veneration for the founder of Houghton ! I will not rob you of the prints you mention, dear Sir ; one of them at least I know Mr. Pennant gave me. I do not ad mire him for his punctihousness with you. Pray tell me the name of your glass-painter ; I do not think I shall want him, but it is not impossible. Mr. Essex agreed with me, that Jarvis's windows for Oxford, after Sir Joshua Reynolds, will not succeed. Most of his colours are opake, and their great beauty depending on a spot of hght for sun or moon, is an im position. When his paintings are exhibited at Charing-cross, all the rest of the room is darkened to reheve them. That 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 61 cannot be done at New College ; or if done, the chapel would be too dark. If there are other hghts, the effect will be lost. This sultry weather will, I hope, quite restore you ; people need not go to Lisbon and Naples, if we continue to have such summers. Yours most sincerely. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Strawberry HiU, August 12, 1779. I WRITE from decency, dear Sir, not from having any thing particular to say, but to thank you for your offer of letting me see the arms of painted glass; which, however, I will dechne, lest it should be broken, and as at present I have no occasion to employ the painter. If I build my offices, perhaps I may have ; but I have dropped that thought for this year. The disastrous times do not inspire expense. Our alarms, I conclude, do not ruffle your hermitage. We are re turning to our state of islandhood, and shall have little, I be lieve, to boast but of what we have been. I see a History of Alien Priories announced ; ' do you know anything of it, or of the author ? I am ever yours. TO THE COUNTESS OF AILESBURY. Strawberry HiU, Friday night, 1779. I AM not at all surprised, my dear Madam, at the intre pidity of Mrs. Damer ; ^ she always was the heroic daughter of a hero. Her sense and coolness never forsake her. I, who am not so firm, shuddered at your ladyship's account. Now that she has stood fire for four hours, I hope she will give as clear proofs of her understanding, of which I have ' This was Mr. Gough's well-known work, entitled " Some Account of the AUen Priories, and of such Lands as they are known to have pos sessed in England and Wales," in two volumes octavo. — E. ^ The packet in which she was crossing from Dover to Ostend was taken by a French frigate, after a running fight of several hours. 62 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. as high opinion as of her courage, and not return in any danger. I am to dine at Ditton to-morrow, and will certainly talk on the subject you recommend; yet I am far, till I have heard more, from thinking with your ladyship, that more troops and artillery at Jersey would be desirable. Any con siderable quantity of either, especially of the former, cannot be spared at this moment, when so big a cloud hangs over this island, nor would any number avail if the French should be masters at sea. A large garrison would but tempt the French thither, were it but to distress this country; and, what is worse, would encourage Mr. Conway to make an impractica ble defence. If he is to remain in a situation so unworthy of him, I confess I had rather he was totally incapable of making any defence. I love him enough not to murmur at his ex posing himself where his country and his honour demand him ; but I would not have him measure himself in a place untenable against very superior force. My present comfort is, as to him, that France at this moment has a far vaster object. I have good reason to believe the government knows that a great army is ready to embark at St. Maloes, but will not stir till after a sea-fight, which we do not know but may be engaged at this moment. Our fleet is allowed to be the finest ever set forth by this country ; but it is inferior in number by seven teen ships to the united squadron of the Bourbons. France, if successful, means to pour in a vast many thousands on us, and has threatened to burn the capital itself. Jersey, my dear Madam, does not enter into a calculation of such magni tude. The moment is singularly awful; yet the vaunts of enemies are rarely executed successfully and ably. Have we trampled America under our foot ? You have too good sense. Madam, to be imposed upon by my arguments, if they are insubstantial. You do know that I have had my terrors for Mr. Conway ; but at present they are out of the question, from the insignificance of his island. Do not listen to rumours, nor believe a single one till it has been canvassed over and over. Fear, folly, fifty motives, will coin new reports every hour at such a conjuncture. When one is 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 63 totally void of credit and power, patience is the only wisdom. I have seen dangers still more imminent They were dis-. persed. Nothing happens in proportion to what is meditated. Fortune, whatever fortune is, is more constant than is the common notion. I do not give this as one of my solid argu ments, but I have always encouraged myself in being supersti tious on the favourable side. I never, like most superstitious people, beheve auguries against my wishes. We have been fortunate in the escape of Mrs. Damer, and in the defeat at Jersey even before , Mr. Conway arrived ; and thence I de pend on the same future prosperity. From the authority of persons who do not reason on such airy hopes, I am seriously persuaded, that if the fleets engage, the enemy will not gain advantage without deep-felt loss, enough probably to dismay their invasion. Coolness may succeed, and then negotiation. Surely, if we can weather the summer, we shall, obstinate as we are against conviction, be compelled by the want of money to relinquish our ridiculous pretensions, now proved to be utterly impracticable ; for, with an inferior navy at home, can we assert sovereignty over America ? It is a contradiction in terms and in fact. It may be hard of digestion to relinquish it, but it is impossible to pursue it Adieu, my dear Madam ! I have not left room for a line more. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. strawberry HiU, Sept. 13, 1779. I AM writing to you at random ; not knowing whether or when this letter will go : but your brother told me last night that an officer, whose name I have forgot, was arrived from Jersey, and would return to you soon. I am sensible how very seldom I have written to you — but you have been few moments out of my thoughts. What they have been, you who know me so minutely may well guess, and why they do not pass my lips. Sense, experience, circumstances, can teach one to command one's self outwardly, but do not divest a most friendly heart of its feelings. I believe the state of my mind 64 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779* has contributed to bring on a very weak and decaying body my present disorders. I have not been well the whole sum mer; but for these three weeks much otherwise. It has at last ended in the gout, which to all appearance will be a short fit On pubhc affairs I cannot speak. Everything is so exag gerated on all sides, that what grains of truth remain in the sieve would appear cold and insipid ; and the great man oeuvres you learn as soon as I. In the naval battle between Byron and D'Estaing, our captains were worthy of any age in our story. You may imagine how happy I am at Mrs. Damer's return, and at her not being at Naples, as she was likely to have been, at the dreadful explosion of Vesuvius.' Surely it will have glutted Sir William's rage for volcanos ! How poor Lady Hamilton's nerves stood it I do not conceive. Oh, mankind ! mankind ! Are there not calamities enough in store for us, but must destruction be our amusement and pursuit ? I send this to Ditton,'^ where it may wait some days ; but I would not suffer a sure opportunity to shp without a hne. You are more obhged to me for all I do not say, than for whatever eloquence itself could pen. P. S. I unseal my letter to add, that undoubtedly you will come to the meeting of Parliament, which will be in October. Nothing can or ever did make me advise you to take a step unworthy of yourself. But surely you have higher and more sacred duties than the government of a molfe-hill ! TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, Nov. 16, 1779. You ought not to accuse yourself only, when I have been as silent as you. Surely we have been friends too long to ' On the 10th of August ; when the eruption was so great, that seve ral villages were destroyed : a hunting seat belonging to the King of Naples, called Caccia BeUa, shared the like fate. — E. " Where Lord Hertford had then a vUla. 1779. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 65 admit ceremony as a go-between. I have thought of writing to you several times, but found I had nothing worth telling you. I am rejoiced to hear your health has been better : mine has been worse the whole summer and autumn than ever it was without any positive distemper, and thence I conclude it is a failure in my constitution — of which, being a thing of course, we will say no more — nobody but a physician is bound to hear what he cannot cure — and if we will pay for what we cannot expect, it is our own fault I have seen Doctor Lort, who seems pleased with becoming a limb of Canterbury. I heartily wish the mitre may not devolve before it has beamed substantially on him. In the mean time he will be delighted with ransacking the library at Lambeth ; and, to do him justice, his ardour is literary, not interested. I am much obliged to you, dear Sir, for taking the trouble of transcribing Mr. Tyson's Journal, which is entertaining. But I am so ignorant as not to know where Hatfield Priory is. The three heads I remember on the gate at Whitehall ; there were five more. The whole demolished structure was trans ported to the great park at Windsor by the late Duke of Cumberland, who intended to re-edify it but never did; and now I suppose Its ruins ruined, as its place no more. I did not know what was become of the heads, and am glad any are preserved. I should doubt their being the works of Torregiano. Pray who is Mr. Nichols, who has published the Ahen Priories; there are half a dozen or more pretty views of French cathedrals. I cannot say that I found anything else in the book that amused me — but as you deal more in ancient lore than I do, perhaps you might be better pleased. I am told there is a new History of Gloucestershire, very large, but ill executed, by one Rudder ' — still I have sent for it, for Gloucestershire is a very historic country. ' " The History and Antiquities of Gloucestershire ; comprising the Topography, Antiquities, Curiosities, Produce, Trade, and Manufac tures of that County :" by Samuel Rudder, printer, Cirencester, folio.— E. VOL. VI. F 66 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1779. It was a vn-ong scent on which I employed you. The arms I have impaled were certainly not Boleyn's. You lament re moval of friends — alas ! dear Sir, when one hves to our age, one feels that in a higher degree than from their change of place ! but one must not dilate those common moralities. You see by my date I have changed place myself. I am got into an excellent, comfortable, cheerful house ; and as, from necessity and inclination, I hve much more at home than I used to do, it is very agreeable to be so pleasantly lodged, and to be in a warm inn as one passes through the last vale. Adieu ! Yours ever. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, Dec. 27, 1779. I K.WE two good reasons against writing, — n6thing to say, and a lame muffled hand ; and therefore I choose to write to you, for it shows remembrance. For these six weeks almost I have been a prisoner with the gout^ but begin to creep about my room. How have you borne the late deluge and the present frost? How do you like an earl-bishop?' Had ' The Hon. and Rev. Frederick Hervey, bishop of Deny, had just suc ceeded to the earldom of Bristol, as fifth Earl, by the death of his brother. Hardy, in his Memoirs of Lord Charlemont, gives the following account of this singular man : — " His family was famous for talents, equally so for eccentricity ; and the eccentricity of the whole race shone out, and seemed to be concentrated in him. In one respect, he was not unlike VilUers Duke of Buckingham, ' every thing by starts, and nothing long ! ' Generous, but uncertain ; splendid, but fantastical ; an admirer of the fine arts, without any just selection ; engaging, often licentious in con versation; extremely polite, extremely violent. His distribution of church livings, chiefly, as 1 have been informed, among the older and respectable clergy in his own diocese, must always be mentioned with that warm approbation which it is justly entitled to. His progress frora his diocese to the metropolis, and his entrance into it, were perfectly correspondent to the rest of his conduct. Through every town on the road, he seemed to court and was received with all warlike honours; and I remember seeing him' pass by the Parliament-house in DubUn (Lords and Commons were then both sitting), escorted by a body of dragoons, fuU of spirits and talk, apparently enjoying the eager gaze of the sur rounding multitude, and displaying altogether the self-complacency of a favourite marshal of France on his way to VersaUles, rather than the grave deportment of a prelate of the church of England." He died in 1603.— E. 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 67 not we one before in ancient days ? I have not a book in town; but was not there Anthony Beck, or a Hubert de Burgh, that was Bishop of Durham and Earl of Kent, or have I confounded them ? Have you seen Rudder's new History of Gloucestershire ? His additions to Sir Robert Atkyns make it the most sensible history of a county that we have had yet; for his descriptions of the scite, soil, products, and prospects of each parish are extremely good and picturesque ; and he treats fanciful preju dices, and Saxon etymologies, when unfounded, and traditions, with due contempt I will not spin this note any further, but shall be glad of a line to tell me you are well. I have not seen Mr. Lort since he roosted under the metropolitan wings of his grace of Lam beth. Yours ever. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, Jan. 5, 1780. When you said that you feared that your particular account of your very providential escape would deter me from writing to you again, I am sure, dear Sir, that you spoke only from modesty, and not from thinking me capable of being so criminally indifferent to anything, much less under such danger as you have run, that regards so old a friend, and one to whom I owe so many obligations. I am but too apt to write letters on trifling or no occasions; and should certainly have told you the interest I take in your accident, and how happy I am that it had no consequences of any sort It is hard that temperance itself, which you are, should be punished for a good-natured transgression of your own rules, and where the excess was only staying out beyond your usual hour. I am heartily glad you did not jump out of your chaise ; it has often been a much worse precaution than any consequences from risking to remain in it ; as you are lame too, might have been very fatal. Thank God ! all ended so welL Mr. Masters seems to have been more F 2 68 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. frightened, with not greater reason. What an absurd man to be impatient to notify a disagreeable event to you, and in so boisterous a manner, and which he could not know was true, since it was not ! I shall take extremely kind your sending me your picture in glass. I have carefully preserved the slight outline of yourself in a gown and night-cap, which you once was so good as to give me, because there was some likeness to your features, though it is too old even now. For a portrait of me in return, you might have it by sending the painter to the anatomical school, and bidding him draw the first skele ton he sees. I should expect any limner would laugh in my face if I offered it to him to be copied. I thought I had confounded the ancient count-bishops, as I had, and you have set me right. The new temporal- ecclesiastical peer's estate is more than twelve thousand a year, though I can scarce believe it is eighteen, as the last lord said. The picture found near the altar in Westminster-abbey, about three years ago, was of King Sebert; I saw it, and it was well preserved, with some others worse — but they have foolishly buried it again behind their new altar-piece; and so they have a very fine tomb of Ann of Cleve, close to the altar, which they did not know till I told them whose it was, though her arms are upon it, and though there is an exact plate of it in Sandford. They might at least have cut out the portraits and removed the tomb to a conspicuous situation ; but though this age is grown so antiquarian, it has not gained a grain more of sense in that walk — witness as you instance in Mr. Grose's Legends, and in the dean and chapter reburying the crown, robes, and sceptre of Edward I. — there would surely have been as much piety in preserving them in their treasury, as in consigning them again to decay. I did not know that the salvation of robes and crowns depended on receiving Christian burial. At the same time, the chapter transgress that prince's will, like aU their antecessors; for he ordered his tomb to be opened every year or two years, and receive a new cere-cloth or pall; but they boast now 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 69 of having enclosed him so substantially, that his ashes cannot be violated again. It was the present Bishop Dean who showed me the pic tures and Ann's tomb, and consulted me on the new altar- piece. — I advised him to have a light octangular canopy, Hke the cross at Chichester, placed over the table or altar itself, which would have given dignity to it, especially if elevated by a flight of steps ; and from the side arches of the octagon, I would have had a semicircle of open arches that should have advanced quite to the seats of the prebends, which would have discovered the pictures ; and through the octagon itself you would have perceived the shrine of Edward the Confessor, which is much higher than the level of the choir — but men who ask advice seldom follow it, if you do not happen to light on the same ideas with themselves. P. S. The Houghton pictures are not lost — but to Hough ton and England ! ' TO ROBERT JEPHSON, ESQ.'^ Berkeley Square, January 25, 1780. It was but yesterday. Sir, that I received the favour of your letter, and this morning I sent, according to your per mission, to Mr. Sheridan the elder, to desire the manuscript of your tragedy ; ' for as I am but just recovering of a fit of ' They had been sold to the Empress of Russia in the preceding Sep tember, and immediately transferred to that country. — E. ° Now first published. ' Mr. Jephson's tragedy of The Count of Narbonne, founded on Wal pole's Gothic story of the Castle of Otranto. It wiU be seen, that it was brought out, in the foUowing year, with considerable success, at Covent Garden theatre. " On Friday evening," says Hannah More, in a letter to one of her sisters, " I went to Mr. Tighe's to hear him read Jephson's tragedy. * Praise,' says Dr. Johnson, 'is a tribute which every man is expected to pay for the grant of perusing a manuscript ;' and in deed I could praise without hurting my conscience, for The Count of Nar bonne has considerable merit ; the language is very poetical, and parts of the fable very interesting ; the plot managed with art, and the characters well drawn. The love scenes I think are the worst : they are prettUy written, and fuU of flowers, but are rather cold ; they have more poetry than passion. I do not mean to detract from Mr. Jephson's merit by this remark ; for it does not lessen a poet's fame, to say he excels more in painting the terrible, than the tender passions." — Memoirs, vol. i. p. 206. — E. 70 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. the gout, which I had severely for above two months, I was not able to bear the fatigue of company at home ; nor could I have had the pleasure of attending to the piece so much as I wished to do, if I had invited ladies to hear it, to whom I must have been doing the honours. I have read your play once, Sir, rapidly, though alone, and therefore cannot yet be very particular on the details ; but I can say already, with great truth, that you have made a great deal more than I thought possible out of the skeleton of a story; and have arranged it so artfully, that unless I am deceived by being too familiar with it, it will be very intelhgi- ble to the audience, even if they have not read the original fable; and you have had the address to make it coherent, without the marvellous, though so much depended on that part In short you have put my extravagant materials in an alembic, and drawn off only what was rational. Your diction is very beautiful, often poetic, and yet what I admire, very simple and natural ; and when necessary, rapid, concise, and sublime. If I did not distrust my own self-love, I should say that I think it must be a very interesting piece : and yet I might say so without vanity, so much of the disposition of the scenes is your own. I do not yet know, Sir, what alterations you pro pose to make ; nor do I perceive where the second and fourth acts want amendment. The first in your manuscript is im perfect If I wished for any correction, it would be to shorten the scene in the fourth act between the Countess, Adelaide, and Austin, which rather delays the impatience of the audi ence for the catastrophe, and does not contribute to it, but by the mother's orders to the daughter at the end of the scene to repair to the great church. In the last scene I should wish to have Theodore fall into a transport of rage and despair immediately on the death of Adelaide, and be carried off by Austin's orders ; for I doubt the interval is too long for him to faint after Narbonne's speech. The fainting fit, I think, might be better applied to the Countess ; it does not seem requisite that she should die, but the audience might be left in suspense about her. 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 71 My last observations will be very trifling indeed. Sir ; but I think you use nobleness, nicewess, &c. too often, which I doubt are not classic terminations for nobility, nicety, &c. though I allow that nobility will not always express nobleness. My children's timeless deaths can scarce be said for untimely ; nor should I choose to employ children's as a plural genitive case, which I think the s at the end cannot imply. " Hearted preference " is very bold for preference taken to heart Ray mond in the last scene says — " Show me thy wound — oh, heU ! 'tis through her heart !" This line is quite unnecessary, and infers an obedience in dis playing her wound which would be shocking; besides, as there is often a buffoon in an audience at a new tragedy, it might be received dangerously. The word " Jehovah " will certainly not be suffered on the stage. In casting the parts I conclude Mrs. Yates, as women never cease to like acting young parts, would prefer that of Adelaide, though the Countess is more suitable to her age; and it is foolish to see her representing the daughter of women fifteen or twenty years younger. As my bad health seldom allows my going to the theatre, I never saw Mr. Henderson but once. His person and style should recommend him to the parts of Raymond or Austin. Smith, I suppose, would ex pect to be Theodore ; but Lewis is younger, handsomer, and, I think, a better actor; but you are in the right, Sir, in having no favourable idea of our stage at present. I am sorry. Sir, that neither my talents nor health allow me to offer to supply you with Prologue and Epilogue. Poetry never was my natural turn ; and what httle propensity I had to it, is totally extinguished by age and pain. It is honour enough to me to have furnished the canons of your tragedy ; I should disgrace it by attempting to supply adventitious ornaments. The clumsiness of the seams would betray my gouty fingers. I shall take the liberty of reading your play once more be fore I return it It will be extraordinary indeed if it is not accepted, but I cannot doubt but it will be, and very success- 72 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. ful ; though it will be great pity but you should have some zealous friend to attend to it, and who is able to bustle, and see justice done to it by the managers. I lament that such a superannuated being as myself is not only totally incapable of that office, but that I am utterly unacquainted with the mana gers, and now too retired to form new connections. I was still more concerned. Sir, to hear of your unhappy accident, though the bad consequences are past. TO ROBERT JEPHSON, ESQ.' Berkeley Square, Jan. 27, 1780. I HAVE returned your tragedy. Sir, to Mr. Sheridan, after having read it again, and without wishing any more alterations than the few I hinted before. There may be some few incorrectnesses, but none of much consequence. I must again applaud your art and judgment Sir, in having made so rational a play out of my wild tale : and where you have changed the arrangement of the incidents, you have applied them to great advantage. The characters of the mother and daughter you have rendered more natural by giving jealousy to the mother, and more passion to the daughter. In short you have both honoured and improved my outlines : my vanity is content, and truth enjoins me to do justice. Bishop Warburton, in his additional notes to Pope's works, which I saw in print in his bookseller's hands, though they have not yet been pubhshed, observed that the plan of The Castle of Otranto was regularly a drama " (an ' Now first printed. = Bishop Warburton's panegyric on The Castle of Otranto appears in a note to the foUowing Unes in Pope's imitation of one of Horace's epistles ; — " Then peers grew proud in horsemanship t' excel, Newmarket's glory rose as Britain's fell ; The soldier breathed the gaUantries of France, And ev'ry flow'ry courtier writ Romance." " Amidst all this nonsense," says the Bishop, " when things were at the worst, we have been lately entertained with what I wUl venture to call a masterpiece in the Fable ; and of a new species likewise. The piece I 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 73 intention I am sure I do not pretend to have conceived; nor, indeed, can I venture to affirm that I had any inten tion at all but to amuse myself — no, not even a plan, till some pages were written). You, Sir, have realized his idea, and yet I believe the Bishop would be surprised to see how well you have succeeded. One cannot be quite ashamed of one's follies, if genius condescends to adopt, and put them to a sensible use. Miss Aikin flattered me even by stooping to tread in my eccentric steps. Her " Fragment," though but a specimen, showed her talent for imprinting terror. I cannot compliment the author of the " Old English Baron," professedly written in imitation, but as a corrective of The Castle of Otranto. It was totally void of imagination and interest ; had scarce any incidents ; and, though it condemned the marvellous, admitted a ghost I suppose the author thought a tame ghost might come within the laws of pro bability. You alone. Sir, have kept within nature, and made superstition supply the place of phenomenon, yet acting as the agent of divine justice — a beautiful use of bigotry. I was mistaken in thinking the end of the first act de ficient. The leaves stuck together, and, there intervening two or three blank pages between the first and second acts, I examined no farther, but concluded the former imperfect, which on the second reading I found it was not I imagine. Sir, that the theatres of Dublin cannot have fewer good performers than those of London ; may I ask why you prefer ours .'' Your own directions and instructions would be of great advantage to your play ; especially if you suspect antitragic prejudices in the managers. You, too, would be the best judge at the rehearsal of what might be improvements. Managers will take liberties, and often cur tail necessary speeches, so as to produce nonsense. Me thinks it is unkind to send a child, of which you have so much reason to be proud, to a Foundling Hospital. mean is The Castle of Otranto. The scene is laid in Gothic chivalry; where a beautiful imagination, supported by strength of judgment, has enabled the author to go beyond his subject, and effect the fuU purpose of the ancient tragedy ; that is, to purge the passions by pity and terror, in colouring as great and harmonious as in any of the best dramatic writers." — E. 74 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, Feb. 5, 1780. I HAVE been turning over the new second volume of the Biographia, and find the additions very poor and lean per formances. The lives entirely new are partial and flat tering, being contributions of the friends of those whose lives are recorded. This publication made at a time when I have lived to see several of my contemporaries deposited in this national temple of fame has made me smile, and reflect that many preceding authors, who have been installed there with much respect, may have been as trifling personages as those we have known and now behold consecrated to memory. Three or four have struck me particularly, as Dr. Birch,' who • was a worthy, good-natured soul, full of industry and ac tivity, and running about like a young setting-dog in quest of anything, new or old, and with no parts, taste, or judg ment Then there is Dr. Blackwell," the most impertinent literary coxcomb upon earth — but the editor has been so just as to insert a very merited satire on his Court of Au gustus. The third is Dr. Brown, that mountebank, who for a little time raade as much noise by his Estimate, as ever quack did by a nostrum. I do not know if I ever told you how much I was struck the only time I ever saw him. You know one object, and the anathemas of his Estimate was the Itahan Opera; yet did I find him one evening, in Passion Week, accompanying some of the Italian singers, at a concert at Lady Carlisle's. A clergyman, no doubt, is not obliged to be on his knees the whole week before Easter, and music and a concert are harmless amusements ; but when Cato or Calvin are out of character, reformation becomes ridiculous • See vol. u. p. 58. — E. ° Dr. Thomas BlackweU, principal of the Marischal CoUege in Aber deen. Besides the above work, he wrote " An Enquiry into the Life and Writings of Homer," and " Letters concerning Mythology." He died in 1757. 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 75 — but poor Dr. Brown was mad,' and therefore might be in earnest, whether he played the fool or the reformer. You recollect, perhaps, the threat of Dr. Kippis to me, which is to be executed on my father, for my calhng the first edition of the Biographia the Vindicatio Britannica — but observe how truth emerges at last ! In his new volume he confesses that the article of Lord Arlington, which I had specified as one of the most censurable, is the one most de serving that censure, and that the character of Lord Arlington is " palliated beyond all truth and reason " — words stronger than mine — yet mine deserved to draw vengeance on my father ! so a Presbyterian divine inverts divine judgment, and visits the sins of the children on the parents ! Cardinal Beaton's character, softened in the first edition, gentle Dr. Kippis pronounces " extremely detestable" — yet was I to blame for hinting such defects in that work ! — and yet my words are quoted to show that Lord Orrery's poetry was ridiculously bad. In like manner, Mr. Cumberland, who assumes the whole honour of publishing his grandfather's Lucan, and does not deign to mention its being published at Strawberry-hill, (though by the way I believe it will be oftener purchased for having been printed there, than for wearing Mr. Cumberland's name to the dedication,) and yet he quotes me for having praised his ancestor in one of my publications. These little instances of pride and spleen di vert me, and then make me reflect sadly on human weak nesses. I am very apt myself to like what flatters my opi nions or passions, and to reject scornfully what thwarts them, even in the same persons. The more one lives, the more one discovers one's uglinesses in the features of others ! Adieu ! dear Sir : I hope you do not suffer by this severe season. P. S. I remember two other instances, where my impar tiality, or at least my sincerity, have exposed me to double censure. You perhaps condemned my severity on Charles the First ; yet the late Mr. Hollis wrote against me in the newspapers, for condemning the repubhcans for their destruc- ' In September 1766, he destroyed himself in a fit of insanity. See vol. iu. p. 90. — E. 76 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. tion of ancient monuments. Some blamed me for under valuing the Flemish and Dutch pictures in my preface to the -Sides Walpohanai. Barry the painter, because I laughed at his extravagances, says, in his rejection of that school, " But I leave them to be admired by the Hon. Horace Walpole, and such judges." Would not one think I had been their champion ! TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, Feb. 27, 1780. Unapt as you are to inquire after news, dear Sir, you wish to have Admiral Rodney's victory confirmed.' I can now assure you, that he has had a considerable advantage, and took at least four Spanish men-of-war, and an admiral, who they say is since dead of his wounds. We must be glad of these deplorable successes — but I heartily wish we had no longer occasion to hope for the destruction of any of our species — but, alas ! it looks as if devastation would still open new fields of blood ! The prospect darkens even at home — but, however you and I may differ in our pohtical principles, it would be happy if everybody would pursue theirs with as lit tle rancour. How seldom does it happen in political contests, that any side can count anything but its wounds ! your habi tudes seclude you from meddling in our divisions; so do my age and my illnesses me. Sixty-two is not a season for bustling among young partisans. Indeed, if the times grow perfectly serious, I shall not wish to reach sixty-three. Even a superannuated spectator is then a miserable being; for though insensibility is one of the softenings of old age, neither one's feelings nor enjoyments can be accompanied with tran- quilhty. We veterans must hide ourselves in inglorious se- ' Admiral Sir George Rodney, who had been dispatched to the relief of Gibraltar, the garrison of which was much distressed for provisions, after taking a convoy of Spanish ships bound to the Caraccas, fell in, on the 16th of February, off Cape St. Vincent, with the Spanish fleet, com manded by Don Juan Langara, which he defeated, and captured four saU of the line. — E. 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 77 curity, and lament what we cannot prevent; nor shall be listened to, till misfortunes have brought the actors to their senses ; and then it will be too late, or they will calm them selves faster than we could preach — but I hope, the expe rience of the last century will have some operation and check our animosities. Surely, too, we shall recollect the ruin a civil war would bring on, when accompanied by such col laterals as French and Spanish wars. Providence alone can steer us amidst all these rocks. I shall watch the inter position of its aegis with anxiety and humility. It saved us this last summer, and nothing else I am sure did; but often the mutual folhes of enemies are the instruments of Heaven. If it pleases not to inspire wisdom, I shall be content if it ex tricates us by the reciprocal blunders and oversights of all parties — of which, at least, we ought never to despair. It is almost my systematic belief, that as cunning and penetration are seldom exerted for good ends, it is the absurdity of man kind that often acts as a succedaneum, and carries on and maintains the equilibrium that Heaven designed should sub sist. Adieu, dear Sir ! Shall we live to lay down our heads in peace ? Yours ever. 28th. — A second volume of Sir George Rodney's exploits is arrived to-day. I do not know the authentic circumstances, for I have not been abroad yet but they say he has taken four more Spanish ships of the line and five frigates ; of the for mer, one of ninety guns. Spain was sick of the war before — how fortunate if she would renounce it ! I have just got a new History of Leicester, in six small volumes. It seems to be superficial ; but the author is young and talks modestly; which, if it will not serve instead of merit, makes one at least hope he will improve, and not grow insolent on age and more knowledge. I have also received from Paris a copy of an illumination from La Cite des Dames of Christina of Pisa, in the French King's hbrary. There is her own portrait with three allegoric figures. I have learnt much more about ber, and of her amour with an Enghsh peer;' but I have not time to say more at present ' John Montacute, Earl of SaUsbury ; who, arriving in Paris, as am- 78 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, March 6, 1780. I HAVE this moment received your portrait in glass, dear Sir, and am impatient to thank you for it and tell you how much I value it It is better executed than I own I expected, and yet I am not quite satisfied with it The drawing is a little incorrect, the eyes too small in proportion, and the mouth exaggerated. In short it is a strong hkeness of your features, but not of your countenance, which is better, and more serene. However, I am enough content to place it at Strawberry amongst all my favourite, brittle, transitory relics, which will soon vanish with their founder — and with his no great unwillingness for himself. I take it ill, that you should think I should suspect you of asking indirectly for my Noble Authors — and much more if you would not be so free as to ask for them directly — a most trifling present surely — and from you who have made me a thousand ! I know I have some copies in my old house in Arlington-street, I hope of both volumes, I am sure of the second. I will soon go thither and look for them. I have gone through the six volumes of Leicester. The author is so modest and so humble, that I am quite sorry it is so very bad a work ; the arrangement detestable, the materials trifling, his reflections humane but silly. He disposes all under reigns of Roman emperors and English kings, whether they did anything or nothing at Leicester. I am sorry I have such predilection for the histories of particular counties and towns : there certainly does not exist a worse class of reading. Dr. E. made me a visit last week. He is not at all less vociferous for his disgrace. I wish I had any Guinea-fowls. I can easily get you some eggs from Lady Ailesbury, and will bassador from Richard II, to demand in marriage the Princess Isabel, daughter of Charles V, soon after the death of Castel, the husband of Christine, was so struck with her beauty and accompUshments as to offer her his hand. This Christine respectfully decUned ; upon which the Earl bade adieu to love, renounced marriage, and, with her consent brought her eldest son with him to England, to educate and protect. E. 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 79 ask her for some, that you may have the pleasure of rearing your own chicks — but how can you bear their noise ? they are more discordant and clamorous than peacocks. How shall I convey the eggs? I smiled at Dr. Kippis's bestowing the victory on Dean Milles, and a sprig on Mr. Masters. I regard it as I should, if the sexton of Broad-street St Giles's were to make a lower bow to a cheesemonger of his own parish than to me. They are all three haberdashers of small wares, and welcome to each other's civilities. When such men are summoned to a jury on one of their own trade, it is natural they should be partial. They do not reason, but recollect how much them selves have overcharged some yards of buckram. Adieu ! P. S. Mr. Pennicott has shown me a most curious and de lightful picture. It is Rose, the royal gardener, presenting the first pine-apple raised in England to Charles II. They are in a garden, with a view of a good private house, such as there are several at Sunbury and about London. It is by far the best likeness of the King I ever saw ; the countenance cheer ful, good-humoured, and very sensible. He is in brown, lined with orange, and many black ribands, a large flapped hat, dark wig, not tied up, nor yet bushy, a point cravat no waistcoat, and a tasselled handkerchief, hanging from a low pocket. The whole is of the smaller landscape size, and ex tremely well coloured, with perfect harmony. It was a legacy from London, grandson of him who was partner with Wise. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. ^ Strawberry HiU, March 13, 1780. You compliment me, my good friend, on a sagacity that is surely very common. How frequently do we see portraits that have catched the features and missed the countenance or character, which is far more difficult to hit; nor is it unfre- quent to hear that remark made. I have confessed to you that I am fond of local histories. It is the general execution of them that I condemn, and that 80 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. I call " the worst kind of reading." I cannot comprehend but that they might be performed with taste. I did mention this winter the new edition of Atkyns's Gloucestershire, as having additional descriptions of situations that I thought had merit. I have just got another, a View of Northumberland, in two volumes, quarto, with cuts;' but I do not devour it fast; for the author's predilection is to Roman antiquities, which, such as are found in this island, are very indifferent and inspire. me with little curiosity. A barbarous country, so remote from the seat of empire, and occupied by a few legions that very rarely decided any great events, is not very interesting, though one's own country ; nor do I care a straw for a stone that preserves the name of a standard-bearer of a cohort, or of a colonel's daughter. Then I have no patience to read the tiresome disputes of antiquaries to settle forgotten names of vanished towns, and to prove that such a village was called something else in Antoninus's Itinerary. I do not say the Gothic antiquities I like are of more importance ; but at least they exist. The site of a Roman camp, of which nothing re mains but a bank, gives me not the smallest pleasure. One knows they had square camps — has one a clearer idea from the spot which is barely distinguishable ? How often does it happen, that the lumps of earth are so imperfect that it is never clear whether they are Roman, Druidic, Danish, or Saxon fragments: the moment it is uncertain, it is plain they furnish no specific idea of art or history, and then I neither desire to see or read of them, I have been diverted, too, by another work, in which I am personally a little con cerned. Yesterday was pubhshed an octavo, pretending to contain the correspondence of Hackman and Miss Ray, that he murdered.2 I doubt whether the letters are genuine ; and ' " A View of Northumberland ; with an Excursion to the Abbey of Melrose, in Scotland, in the Year 1776 ; " by WUUam Hutchinson, F.A.S. Two volumes 4to ; 1778-80.— E. ^ The work here alluded to was written by Sir Herbert Croft, Bart. It was a compound of fact and fiction, called " Love and Madness a Story too true, in a Series of Letters between Parties, whose names would, perhaps, be mentioned, were they less known or less lamented. London, 1780." The work ran through several editions. In 1800, Sir Herbert pubUshed " Chatterton and Love and Madness, in a Letter 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 81 yet, if fictitious, they are executed well, and enter into his character : hers appear less natural, and yet the editors were certainly more likely to be in possession of hers than his. It is not probable that Lord Sandwich should have sent what he found in her apartments to the press. No account is pre tended to be given of how they came to light. You will wonder how I should be concerned in this cor respondence, who never saw either of the lovers in my days. In fact, my being dragged in is a reason for doubting the authenticity ; nor can I believe that the long letter in which I am frequently mentioned could be written by the wretched lunatic. It pretends that Miss Ray desired him to give her a particular account of Chatterton. He does give a most ample one ; but is there a ghmpse of probability that a being so fran tic should have gone to Bristol, and sifted Chatterton's sister and others with as much cool curiosity as Mr. Lort could do ? and at such a moment ! Besides, he murdered Miss Ray, I think, in March ; my printed defence was not at all dispersed before the preceding January or February, nor do I conceive that Hackman could even see it There are notes, indeed, by the editor, who has certainly seen it ; but I rather imagine that the editor, whoever he is, composed the whole volume. I am acquitted of being accessory to the lad's death, which is gracious ; but much blamed for speaking of his bad character, and for being too hard on his forgeries, though I took so much pains to specify the innocence of them; and for his character, I only quoted the words of his own editor and panegyrist. I did not repeat what Dr. Goldsmith told me at the Royal Academy, where I first heard of his death, that he went bythe appellation of " The Young Villain;" but it is not new to me, as you know, to be blamed by two opposite parties. The editor has in one place confounded me and my uncle ; who, he says, as is true, checked Lord Chatham for being too forward a young man in 1740. In that year I was not even come into Parliament; and must have been from Sir Herbert Croft to Mr. Nichols." Boswell says, that Dr. John son greatly disapproved of mingling real facts with fiction, and on this account censured " Love and Madness." — E. VOL. VI. G 82 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. absurd indeed if I had taunted Lord Chatham with youth, who was, at least, six or seven years younger than he was ; and how could he reply by reproaching me with old age, who was then not twenty-three ? I shall make no answer to these absurdities, nor to any part of the work. Blunder, I see, people will, and talk of what they do not understand? and what care I ? There is another trifling mistake of still less consequence. The editor supposes it was Macpherson who communicated Ossian to me. It was Sir David Dalrymple who sent me the first specimen.' Macpherson did once come to me, but my credulity was then a little shaken. Lady Ailesbury has promised me Guinea-eggs for you, but they have not yet begun to lay. I am well acquainted with Lady Craven's little tale, dedicated to me.*^ It is careless and incorrect but there are very pretty things in it. I will stop, for I fear I have written to you too much lately. One you did not mention : I think it was of the 28th of last month. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, March 30, 1780. I CANNOT be told that you are extremely ill, and refrain from begging to hear that you are better. Let me have but one line ; if it is good, it will satisfy me. If you was not out of order, I would scold you for again making excuses about the Noble Authors ; it was not kind to be so formal about a trifie. We do not differ so much in politics as you think, for when they grow too serious, they are so far from infiaming my zeal, they make me more moderate ; and I can as easily discern the faults on my own side as on the other; nor would assist Whigs more than Tories in altering the constitution. The project of annual parliaments, or of adding a hundred members to the House of Commons, would, I think, be very unwise, and will never have my approbation — but a temperate man is not ' See vol. iv. p. 55. — E. = Entitled " The Miniature Picture."— E. 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 83 hkely to be hstened to in turbulent times ; and when one has not youth and lungs, or ambition, to make oneself attended to, one can only be silent and lament, and preserve oneself blameless of any mischief that is done or attempted. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, May 11, 1780. Mr. Godfrey, the engraver, told me yesterday that Mr. Tyson is dead.^ I am sorry for it, though he had left me off. A much older friend of mine died yesterday ; but of whom I must say the same, George Montagu, whom you must remem ber at Eton and Cambridge. I should have been exceedingly concerned for him a few years ago ; but he had dropped me, partly from politics and partly from caprice, for we never had any quarrel; but he was grown an excessive humourist, and had shed almost all his friends as well as me. He had parts, and infinite vivacity and originality till of late years ; and it grieved me much that he had changed towards me, after a friendship of between thirty and forty years. I am told that a nephew of the provost of King's has preached and printed a most fiaming sermon, which condemns the whole Opposition to the stake. Pray who is it and on what occasion ? Mr. Bryant has pubhshed an Answer to Dr. Priestley.2 I bought it, but though I have a great value for the author, the subject is so metaphysical, and so above human decision, I soon laid it aside. I hope you can send me a good account of yourself, though the spring is so un favourable. Yours most sincerely. ' Mr. Cole, in a letter of the 14th, says, " the loss of poor Mr. Tyson shocked and afiiicted me more than I thought it possible I could have been afflicted : since the loss of Mr. Gray, I have lamented no one so much. God rest his soul ! I hope he is happy ; and, was it not for those he has left behind, I am so much of a phUosopher, now the affair is over, I would prefer the exchange." — E. ' It was entitled " An Address to Dr. Priestley upon his Doctrine of PhUosophical Necessity IUustrated." — E. g2 84 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Friday night. May 19, 1780. By to-morrow's coach you will receive a box of Guinear hens' eggs, which Lady Ailesbury sent me to-day from Park- place. I hope they will arrive safe and all be hatched. I thank you for the account of the sermon and the por trait of the uncle. They will satisfy me without buying the former. As I knew Mr. Joseph Spence,* I do not think I should have been so much delighted as Dr. Kippis with reading his letters. He was a good-natured, harmless little soul, but more like a silver penny than a genius. It was a neat fiddle-faddle, bit of sterling, that had read good books and kept good company, but was too trifling for use, and only fit to please a child. I hesitate on purchasing Mr. Gough's second edition. I do not think there was a guinea's worth of entertainment in the first ; how can the additions be worth a guinea and a half? I have been aware of the royal author you tell me of, and have noted him for a future edition ; but that will not appear in my own time; because, besides that, it will have the castra tions in my original copy, and other editions, that I am not impatient to produce. I have been solicited to reprint the work, but do not think it fair to give a very imperfect edition when I could print it complete, which I do not choose to do, as I have an aversion to literary squabbles: one seems to think one's self too important when one engages in a contro versy on one's writings; and when one does not vindicate them, the answerer passes for victor, as you see Dr. Kippis allots the palm to Dr. MiUes, though you know I have so much more to say in defence of my hypothesis. I have actu ally some hopes of still more, of which I have heard, but tiU I see it I shall not reckon upon it as on my side. Mr. Lort told me of King James's Procession to St Paul's; but they ask such a price for it, and I care so little for James I, that I have not been to look at the picture. ' See vol. i. p. 65.— E. 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 85 Your electioneering will probably be increased immediately. Old Mr. Thomas Townshend is at the point of death.* The Parliament will probably be dissolved before another session. We wanted nothing but drink to inflame our madness, which I do not confine to politics ; but what signifies it to throw out general censures ? We old folks are apt to think nobody wise but ourselves. I wish the disgraces of these last two or three years did not justify a little severity more than flows from the peevishness of years ! Yours ever. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, May 30, 1780. I HOPE you will bring your eggs to a fair market At last I have got from Bonus my altar-doors which I bought at Mr. Ives's; he has repaired them admirably. I would not suffer him to repaint or varnish them. Three are indubitably Duke Humphrey of Gloucester, Cardinal Beaufort, and Arch bishop Kemp. The fourth I cannot make out. It is a man in a crimson garment lined with white, and not tonsured. He is in the stable with cattle, and has the air of Joseph ; but over his head hangs a large shield with these arms. * * * * 2 The Cornish choughs are sable on or; the other three divi sions are gules, on the first of which is a gold crescent. The second arms have three bulls' heads sable, horned or. The chevron was so changed that Bonus thought it sable ; but I think it was gules, and then it would be Bullen or Boleyn. Lord de Ferrars says, the first are the arms of Sir Bartholo mew Tate, who he finds married a Sanders. Edmondson's new Dictionary of Heraldry confirms both arms for Tate and ' The Right Hon. Thomas Townshend, son of Charles second Vis count Townshend, many years member for the University of Cambridge. He died a few days after the date of this letter. He was a most elegant scholar, and Uved in acquaintance and famUiarity with most of the consi derable men of his tiine. In early life he entered into the secretary of state's office under his father, whom he accompanied in his journeys to Germany with George the First and Second. At the time of his death he was in his seventy-ninth year. — E. ' Here Mr. Walpole had sketched in a rough draught of the arms. 86 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. Sanders, except that Sanders bore the chevron ermine, which it may have been. But what I wish to discover is, whether Sir Bartholomew Tate was a benefactor to St Edmondsbury, whence these doors came, or was in any shape a retainer to the Duke of Gloucester or Cardinal Beaufort The Duke's and Sir Bartholomew's figures were on the insides of the doors (which I have had sawed into four pannels), and are painted in a far superior style to the Cardinal and the Archbishop, which are very hard and dry. The two others are so good that they are in the style of the school of the Caracci. They at least were painted by some Italian; the draperies have large and bold folds, and one wonders how they could be exe cuted in the reign of Henry VI. I shall be very glad if you can help me to any lights, at least about Sir Bartholomew. I intend to place them in my chapel, as they will aptly ac company the shrine. The Duke and Archbishop's agree per fectly with their portraits in my Marriage of Henry VI, and prove how rightly I guessed. The Cardinal's is rather a longer and thinner visage, but that he might have in the latter end of life ; and in the Marriage he has the red bonnet on, which shortens his face. On the door he is represented in the character he ought to have possessed, a pious, contrite look, not the truer resemblance which Shakspeare drew— " He dies, and makes no sign ! " — but Annibal Caracci him self could not paint like our Raphael poet ! Pray don't ven ture yourself in any more electioneering riots : you see the mob do not respect poets, nor, I suppose, antiquaries. P. S. I am in no haste for an answer to my queries. TO MRS. ABINGTON.* Strawberry HiU, June 11, 1780. MADAM, You may certainly always command me and my house. My common custom is to give a ticket for only four persons at ' Now first printed. 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 87 a time ; but it would be very insolent in me, when all laws are set at nought, to pretend to prescribe rules. At such times there is a shadow of authority in setting the laws aside by the legislature itself; and though I have no army to supply their place, I declare Mrs. Abington may march through all my dominions at the head of as large a troop as she pleases. I do not say, as she can muster and command ; for then I am sure my house would not hold them. The day, too, is at her own choice ; and the master is her very obedient hum ble servant TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Strawberry HiU, June 12, 1780. MY DEAR LORD, If the late events had been within the common propor tion of news, I would have tried to entertain your lordship with an account of them ; but they were far beyond that size, and could only create horror and indignation. Religion has often been the cloak of injustice, outrage, and villany: in our late tumults,* it scarce kept on its mask a moment ; its perse cution was downright robbery; and it was so drunk, that it killed its banditti faster than they could plunder. The tumults have been carried on in so violent and scandalous a manner, that I trust they will have no copies. When prisons are levelled to the ground, when the Bank is aimed at and re formation is attempted by conflagrations, the savages of Canada ' The riots of 1780, when Lord George Gordon raised a no-popery cry, and assembled many thousand persons in St. George's Fields, to ac company him to the House of Commons, with a petition for the repeal of the act passed for the relief of the Roman Catholics in the preceding session. Tbe petition was, of course, rejected; which being communi cated to the mob by Lord George, they dispersed for a whUe, but on that evening commenced their work of mischief, destroying two CathoUc chapeh in Duke-street and Warwick-street : Newgate and all the other prisons were Ukewise fired ; the Bank was attempted ; and the riot was not queUed until 210 persons were kiUed and 248 wounded, of whom seventy-five died in the hospitals. Lord George was committed to the Tower ; and many of the ringleaders, after being tried by special com missioners, suffered the extreme penalty of the law. — E. 88 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. are the only fit allies of Lord George Gordon* and his crew. The Tower is much too dignified a prison for him — but he had left no other. I came out of town on Friday, having seen a good deal of the shocking transactions of Wednesday night — in fact, it was difficult to be in London, and not see or think some part of it in flames. I saw those of the King's Bench, New Prison, and those on the three sides of the Fleet-market, which united into one blaze.« The town and parks are now one camp — the next disagreeable sight to the capital being in ashes. It will StiU not have been a fatal tragedy, if it brings the nation one and all to their senses. It will still be not quite an un happy country, if we reflect that the old constitution, exactly as it was in the last reign, was the most desirable of any in the universe. It made us then the first people in Europe — we have a vast deal of ground to recover — but can we take a better path than that which King William pointed out to us? I mean the system he left us at the Revolution. I am averse to all changes of it — it fitted us just as it was. For some time even individuals must be upon their guard. Our new and now imprisoned apostle has delivered so many congenial Saint Peters from gaol, that one hears of nothing but robberies on the highway. Your lordship's sister. Lady Browne, and I have been at Twickenham-park this evening, and kept together, and had a horseman at our return. Baron d'Aguilar was shot at in that very lane on Thursday night. A ' Lord George Gordon was brother of Alexander Duke of Gordon. He was considered not to be at all times of sound mind. Some years after his acquittal, on the indictment preferred against him in the Court of King's Bench as instigator of the riots, he was convicted of a libel on Marie Antoinette and Count d'Ademar, one of the French ministry. To avoid punishment, he fled the country ; but shortly afterwards was dis covered at Birmingham in the garb of a Jew, and committed to Newgate, pursuant to his sentence, where he lived some time, professing the Jew ish reUgion, having undergone the extreme rites of it, and where he died, in November 1793. — E. ° In her reply to a letter from Walpole, giving an account of these riots, Madame du Deffand says — " Rien n'est plus affreux que tout ce qui ar rive chez vous. Votre liberty ne me seduit point ; cette libertl tant vantde me paroit bien plus on^reuse que notre esclavage; mais il ne m'appartient pas de traiter de teUes matieres : permettez-moi de blamer votre indiscretion, de vous aller promener dans les rues pendant ce va- carme." — B. 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 89 troop of the fugitives had rendezvoused in Combe Wood, and were dislodged thence yesterday by the light horse. I do not know a syllable but what relates to these dis turbances. The newspapers have neglected few truths. Lies, without their natural propensity to falsehoods, they could not avoid, for every minute produces some, at least exaggerations. We were threatened with swarms of good Protestants d bruler from all quarters, and report sent various detachments from the metropolis on similar errands ; but thank God they have been but reports ! Oh ! when shall we have peace and tran quillity? I hope your lordship and Lady Strafford will at least enjoy the latter in your charming woods. I have long doubted which of our passions is the strongest — perhaps every one of them is equally strong in some person or other — but I have no doubt but ambition is the most detestable, and the most inexcusable ; for its mischiefs are by far the most extensive, and its enjoyments by no means proportioned to its anxieties. The latter, I believe, is the case of most passions —but then all but ambition cost little pain to any but the pos sessor. An ambitious man must be divested of all feeling but for himself. The torment of others is his high road to hap piness. Were the transmigration of souls true, and accom panied by consciousness, how delighted would Alexander or CrcKSUs be to find themselves on four legs, and divested of a wish to conquer new worlds, or to heap up all the wealth of this ! Adieu, my dear lord ! TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Strawberry Hill, June 15, 1780. You may like to know one is alive, dear Sir, after a mas sacre, and the conflagration of a capital. I was in it both on the Friday and on the Black Wednesday; the most horrible sight I ever beheld, and which, for six hours together, I ex pected to end in half the town being reduced to ashes. I can give you httle account of the original of this shocking affair ; negligence was certainly its nurse, and religion only its god- 90 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. mother. The ostensible author is in the Tower. Twelve or fourteen thousand men have quelled all tumults ; and as no bad account is come from the country, except for a moment at Bath, and as eight days have passed, — nay, more, since the commencement, — I flatter myself the whole nation is shocked at the scene ; and that, if plan there was, it was laid only in and for the metropohs. The lowest and most villanous of the people, and to no great amount, were almost the sole actors. I hope your electioneering riotry* has not, nor will mix in these tumults. It would be most absurd ; for Lord Rocking ham, the Duke of Richmond, Sir George Saville, and Mr. Burke, the patrons of toleration, were devoted to destruction as much as the ministers. The rails torn from Sir George's house were the chief weapons and instriftnents of the mob. For the honour of the nation I should be glad to have it proved that the French were the engineers. You and I have hved too long for our comfort — shall we close our eyes in peace ? I will not trouble you more about the arms I sent you : I should hke that they were those of the family of Bo leyn ; and since I cannot be sure they were not, why should not I fancy them so ? I revert to the prayer for peace. You and I, that can amuse ourselves with our books and papers, feel as much indignation at the turbulent as they have scorn for us. It is hard at least that they who disturb nobody can have no asylum in which to pursue their innoxious indolence ! Who is secure against Jack Straw and a whirlwind ? How I abominate Mr. Banks and Dr. Solander, who routed the poor Otaheitans out of the centre of the ocean, and carried our abominable passions amongst them I not even that poor little speck could escape European restlessness. Well, I have seen many tempestuous scenes, and outlived them ! the present prospect is too thick to see through — it is well hope never forsakes us. Adieu ! ' Of the " electioneering riotry " going on at this time in Cambridge shire, Mr. Cole, in a letter of the 14th of May, gives the following ae-' count: — "Electioneering madness and faction have inflamed this county to such a degree, that the peace it has enjoyed for above half a century may take as long a time before it returns again. Yesterday, the three candidates were nominated ; the Duke of Rutland's brother, the late Mr. Charles Yorke's son, and Sir Sampson Gideon, whose expenses for 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 91 TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Strawberry HiU, July 4, 1780. I ANSWER your letter the moment I receive it, to beg you will by no means take any notice, not even indirectly and without my name, of the Life of Mr. Baker. I am earnest against its being known to exist. I should be teased to show it Mr. Gough might inquire about it — I do not desire his acquaintance ; and above all things I am determined, if I can help it, to have no controversy while I hve. You know I have hitherto suppressed my answers to the critics of Rich ard III. for that reason ; and above all things, I hate theologic or political controversy — nor need you fear my disputing with you, though we disagree very considerably indeed about Pa pists and Presbyterians. I hope you have not yet sent the manuscript to Mr. Lort, and if you have not, do entreat you to efface undecipherably what you have said about my Life of Mr. Baker. Pray satisfy me that no mention of it shall appear in print. I can by no means consent to it, and I am sure you will pre vent it Yours sincerely. TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Strawberry HUl, Sept. 9, 1780. I AM very happy at receiving a letter from your lordship this moment, as I thought it very long since we had corre sponded, but am afraid of being troublesome, when I have not the excuse of thanking you, or something worth telhng you, which in truth is not the case at present No soul, whether this month have been enormous, beyond all beUef. Sending my servant on a particular message to Sir Sampson, he found him in bed, not well, and probably half asleep ; for he not only wrote the direction to two fovers which I sent him, but sealed them both, though they were only covers. I wonder, indeed, that he is alive, considering the immense fatigue and necessary drinking he must undergo — a miserable hard task to get into ParUament I " The contest terminated in the return of Lord Robert Manners, who died, in AprU 1782, of the wounds he received in the great sea-fight in the West Indies ; and of Mr. PhiUp Yorke, who, in 1790, succeeded his uncle as Earl of Hardwicke. — E. 92 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. interested or not, but deafens one about elections. I always detested them, even when in Parliament ; and when I lived a good deal at White's, preferred hearing of Newmarket to elec tions; for the former, being uttered in a language I did not understand, did not engage my attention ; but as they talked of elections in English, I could not help knowing what they said. It does surprise me, I own, that people can choose to stuff their heads with details and circumstances, of which in six weeks they will never hear or think more. The weather till now has been the chief topic of conversation. Of late it has been the third very hot summer ; but ¦ refreshed by so httle rain, that the banks of the Thames have been and are, I believe, like those of the Manzanares. The night before last we had some good showers, and to-day a thick fog has dis solved in some as thin as gauze. Still I am not quite sorry to enjoy the weather of adust climates without their tempests and insects. Lady Cowper I lately visited, and but lately : if what I hear is true, I shall be a gainer, for they talk of Lord Duncannon having her house at Richmond : like your lordship, I confess I was surprised at his choice. I know nothing to the prejudice of the young lady ; * but I should not have se lected, for so gentle and very amiable a man, a sister of the empress of fashion,** nor a daughter of the goddess of wisdom.' They talk of great dissatisfactions in the fleet. Geary and Barrington are certainly retired. It looks, if this deplorable war should continue, as if all our commanders by sea and land were to be disgraced or disgusted. The people here have christened Mr. Shirley's new house, Spite-hall.* It is dismal to think that one may live to seventy- seven, and go out of the world doing as ill-natured an act as possible ! When I am reduced to detail the gazette of Twick enham, I had better release your lordship ; but either way it ' In the foUowing November, Lord Duncannon married Henrietta- Frances, second daughter of John first Earl Spencer. — E. '' Georgiana, eldest daughter of John first Earl Spencer; mai-ried, in 1774, to the Duke of Devonshire. — E. = Margaret-Georgiana, daughter of the Right Hon. Stephen Poyntz ; married, in 1755, to John first Earl Spencer. — E. * Because built, it was said, on purpose to intercept a view of the Thames from his opposite neighbour. 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 93 is from the utmost attention and respect for your lordship and Lady Strafford, as I am ever most devotedly and gratefully yours. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Strawberry HUl, Sept. 27, 1780. DEAR SIR, I MUST inquire how you do after all your electioneering agitations, which have growled even around your hermitage. Candidates and their emissaries are hke Pope's authors, " They pierce our thickets, through our groves they glide." However, I have barred my doors ; and when I would not go to an election for myself, I would not for any one else. Has not a third real summer, and so very dry one, assisted your complaints? I have been remarkably well, and better than for these five years. Would I could say the same of all my friends — but, alas ! I expect every day to hear that I have lost my dear old friend Madame du Deffand.* She was indeed near eighty-four, but retained all her interior faculties — two days ago the letters from Paris forbade all hopes. So I reckon myself dead as to France, where I have kept up no other connexion. ' In the last letter Madame du Deffand ever wrote to Walpole, dated the 22nd of August, she thus describes her situation : — " Je vous man- dai dans ma derniere que je ne me portals pas bien ; c'est encore pis aujourd'hui. Je Suis d'une foiblesse et d'un abattement excessifs; ma voix est eteinte, je ne puis me soutenir sur mes jambes, je ne puis me donner aucun mouvement, j'ai le coeur enveloppe, j'ai de la peine a croire que cet dtat ne m'annonce une fin prochaine. Je n'ai pas la force d'en etre effrayee ; et, ne vous devant re voir de ma vie, je n'ai rien a re- gretter. Divertissez-vous, mon ami, le plus que vous pourrez; ne vous aflligez point de mon ^tat ; nous etions presque perdus I'un pour I'autre ; nous ne nous devious jamais revoir ; vous me regretterez, parce qu'on est bien-aise de se savoir aime. Peut-etre que par la suite Wiart vous maii- dera de mes nouvelles ; c'est une fatigue pour moi de dieter." From this day she kept her bed. On the 8th of September Mr. Walpole had written to her, expressing his great anxiety for her. To his inquiries she was unable to dictate an answer. Her ante-room continued every day crowded with the persons who had before surrounded her supper- table. Her weakness became excessive; but she suffered no pain, and possessed her memory, understanding, and ideas tiU within the last eight 94 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. I am going at last to publish my fourth volume of Painters, which, though printed so long, I have literally treated by Horace's rule, " Nonumque prematur in annum." Tell me how I shaU send it to you. Yours ever. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, Oct. 3, 1780. I DID not go to Malvern, and therefore cannot certify you, my good Sir, whether Tom Hearne mistook stone for brass or not, though I dare to say your criticism is just. My book, if I can possibly, shall go to the inn to-morrow, or next day at least. You will find a great deal of rubbish in it, with all your partiality — but I shall have done with it I cannot thank you enough for your goodness about your notes that you promised Mr. Grose; but I cannot possibly be less generous and less disinterested, nor can by any means be the cause of your breaking your word. In short, I insist on your sending your notes to him — and as to my Life of Mr. Baker, if it is known to exist, nobody can make me produce it sooner than I please, nor at all if I do not please ; so pray send your accounts, and leave me to be stout with our antiquaries, or curious. I shall not satisfy the latter, and don't care a straw for the former. The Master of Pembroke (who he is, I don't know*) is hke the lover who said, " Have I not seen thee where thou hast not been ?" I have been in Kent with Mr. Barrett, but was not at Ramsgate; the Master, going thither, perhaps saw me. It is a mistake not worth rectifying. I have no time for more, being in the midst of the dehvery of my books. Yours ever. days of her existence, when a lethargic insensibility took place, which terminated in death, without effort or struggle, on the 24th of Septem ber. She was buried, according to her own direction, in the plainest manner, in her parish church of St. Sulpice. To Mr. Walpole she be queathed the whole of her manuscripts, papers, letters, and books, of every description ; with a permission to the Prince of Beauvau to take a copy of any of the papers he might desire. — E. ' Dr. James Brown ; see vol. v. p. 318.— E. 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 95 TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, Nov. 11, 1780. I AM afraid you are not well, my good Sir ; for you are so obligingly punctual, that I think you would have ac knowledged the receipt of my last volume, if you were not out of order. Lord Dacre lent me the new edition of Mr. Gough's To pography, and the ancient maps and quantity of additions tempted me to buy it I have not gone through much above half of the first volume, and find it more entertaining than the first edition. This is no partiality ; for I think he seems rather disposed, though civilly, to find cavils with me. In deed, in the passage in which I am most mentioned, he not only gives a very confused, but quite a wrong account : as in other places, he records some trifles in my possession not worth recording — but I know that we antiquaries are but too apt to think, that whatever has had the honour of en tering our ears, is worthy of being laid before the eyes of everybody else. The story I mean is p. xi. of the preface. Now the three volumes of drawings and tombs, by Mr. Le- thueillier and Sir Charles Frederick, for which Mr. Gough says I refused two hundred pounds, and are now Lord Bute's, are not Lord Bute's, but mine, and for which I never was offered two hundred pounds, and for which I gave sixty pounds — full enough. The circumstances were much more entertaining than Mr. G.'s perplexed account Bishop Lyt telton told me Sir Charles Frederick complained of Mr. L.'s not bequeathing them to him, as he had been a joint la bourer with him ; and that Sir Charles wished I would not bid against him for them, as they were to be sold by auction. I said this was a very reasonable request, and that I was ready to obhge Sir Charles ; but as I heard others meant to bid high for the books, I should wish to know how far he would go, and that I would not oppose him; but should the books exceed the price Sir Charles was willing to give, I should like to be at hberty to bid for them against others. 96 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. However, added I, as Sir Charles (who lived then in Berke ley-square, as I did then in Arlington-street) passes by my door every time he goes to the House of Commons, if he will call on me, we will make such agreement — You will scarce believe the sequel. The dignity of Sir Charles Frederick was hurt that I should propose his making me the first visit, though to serve himself — nothing could be more out of my imagination than the ceremonial of visits; though when he was so simple as to make a point of it I could not see how in any light I was called on to make the first visit — and so the treaty ended; and so I bought the books. There was an other work, I think in two volumes, which was their Diary of their Tour, with a few slight views. Bishop Lyttelton proposed them to me, and engaged to get them for me from Mr. Lethueillier's sister for ten guineas. She hesitated, the Bishop died, I thought no more of them, and they may be what Lord Bute has. There is another assertion in Mr. Gough, which I can authentically contradict He says Sir Matthew Decker first introduced ananas, p. 134. My very cu rious picture of Rose, the royal gardener, presenting the first ananas to Charles II. proves the culture here earlier by several years. At page 373, he seems to doubt my assertion of Gravelot's making drawings of tombs in Gloucestershire, because he never met with any engravings from them. I took my ac count from Vertue, who certainly knew what he said. I bought at Vertue's own sale some of Gravelot's drawings of our regal monuments, which Vertue engra;ved: but, which is stronger, Mr. Gough himself a few pages after, viz. in p. 387, mentions Gravelot's drawings of Tewkesbury church ; which being in Gloucestershire, Mr. G. might haVe be hoved me that Gravelot did draw in that county. This is a httle hke Mr. Masters's being angry with me for taking li berties with bishops and chancellors, and then abusing grossly one who had been both bishop and chancellor. I forgot that in the note on Sir Charles Frederick, Mr. Gough calls Mr. Worseley, Wortley. In page 354, he says Rooker ex hibited a drawing of Waltham-cross to the Royal Academy 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 97 of Sciences — pray where is that academy? I suppose he means that of painting. I find a few omissions; one very comical; he says Penshurst was celebrated by Ben Jonson, and seems totally in the dark as to how much more fame it owes to Waller. We antiquaries are a little apt to get laughed at for knowing what everybody has forgotten, and for being ignorant of what every child knows. Do not tell him of these things, for I do not wish to vex him. I hope I was mistaken, and shall hear that you are well Yours ever. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, Nov. 24, 1780. I AM sorry I was so much in the right in guessing you had been ill, but at our age there is little sagacity in such divination. In my present holidays from the gout, I have a little rheumatism, or some of those accompaniments. I have made several more notes to the new Topography, but none of consequence enough to transcribe. It is well it is a book only for the adept, or the scorners would often laugh. Mr. Gough, speaking of some cross that has been removed, says, there is now an unmeaning market-house in its place. Saving his reverence and our prejudices, I doubt there is a good deal more meaning in a market-house than in a cross. They tell me that there are numberless mistakes. Mr. Pennant, whom I saw yesterday, says so. He is not one of our plodders; rather the other extreme. His corporal spirits (for I cannot call them animal) do not allow him time to digest anything. He gave a round jump from or nithology to antiquity; and, as if they had any relation, thought he understood everything that lay between them. These adventures divert me who am got on shore, and find how sweet it is to look back on those who are toiling in deep waters, whether in ships, or cock-boats, or on old rotten planks. I am sorry for the Dean of Exeter; if he dies, I VOL. VI. H 98 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. conclude the leaden mace of the Antiquarian Society will be given to Judge Barrington,* " Et simUi frondescet Virga metaUo." I endeavoured to give our antiquaries a little wrench towards taste — but it was in vain. Sandby and our engravers have lent them a great deal — but there it stops. Captain Grose's dissertations are as dull and silly as if they were written for the Ostrogoth maps of the beginning of the new Topogra phy ; and which are so square and so incomprehensible, that they look as if they were ichnographies of the new Jeru salem. I am delighted with having done with the profes sions of author and printer, and intend to be most comfortr ably lazy, I was going to say idle (but that would not be new) for the rest of my days. If there was a peace, I would build my offices — if there is not soon, we shall be bankrupt — nay, I do not know what may happen as it is. — Well ! Mr. Grose will have plenty of ruins to engrave ! The Royal Academy will make a fine mass, with what remains of old Somerset-house. Adieu ! my good Sir. Let me know you are well. You want nothing else, for you can always amuse yourself, and do not let the foohsh world disturb you. Yours most sincerely. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, Nov. 30, 1780. I AM sorry, my dear Sir, that you should be so humble with me your ancient friend, and to whom you have ever been so liberal, as to make an apology for desiring me to grant the request of another person. I am not less sorry that I shall not, I fear, be able to comply with it ; and you must have the patience to hear my reasons. The first edition of the Anec dotes was of three hundred, of the two first volumes ; and of * The Hon. Daines Barrington, fourth son of John first Viscount Bar rington, second Justice of Chester, and author of " Observations on the Statutes," &c. He was eminent in natural history, and in several branches of literature; and died in 1800. — E. 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 99 as many of the third volume, and of the volume of Engravers. Then there was an edition of three hundred of all four. Un luckily I did not keep any number back of the two first volumes, and literally have none but those I reserved for my self. Of the other two I have two or three ; and, I believe, I have a first, but without the cuts. If I can, with some odd volumes that I kept for corrections, make out a decent set the library of the University shall have them ; but you must not promise them, lest I should not be able to perform. Of my new fourth volume I printed six hundred; but as they can be had, I believe not a third part is sold. This is a very plain lesson to me, that my editions sell for their curi osity, and not for any merit in them : and so they would if I printed Mother Goose's Tales, and but a few. As my Anec dotes of Painting have been published at such, distant periods, and in three divisions, complete sets will be seldom seen ; so, if I am humbled as an author, I may be vain as a printer ; and, when one has nothing else to be vain of, it is certainly very little worth while to be proud of that I will now trust you with a secret, but beg Mr. Gough may not know it, for he will print it directly. Though I forgot Alma Mater, I have not forgotten my Almae Nutrices, wet or dry, I mean Eton and King's. I have laid aside for them, and left them in my will, as complete a set as I could, of all I have printed, A few I did give them at first; but I have for neither a perfect set of the Anecdotes, I mean not the two first volumes. I should be much obliged to you, if, without naming me, you could inform yourself if I did send to King's those two first volumes — I believe not. I will now explain what I said above of Mr. Gough. He has learnt, I suppose from my engravers, that I have had some views of Strawberry-hill engraved. Slap-dash, down it went, and he has even specified each view in his second volume. This curiosity is a little impertinent; but he has made me some amends by a new blunder, for he says they are engraved for a second edition of my Catalogue. Now I have certainly printed but one edition, for which the prints are designed. He says truly, that I printed but a few for use ; consequently, I h2 100 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. by no means wished the whole world should know it ; but he is very silly, and so I will say no more about him. Dr. Lort called yesterday, and asked if I had any message for you ; but I had written too lately. Mr. Pennant has been, as I think I told you, in town : by this time I conclude he is, as Lady Townley says of fifty pounds, all over the kingdom. When Dr. Lort returns, 1 shall be very glad to read your transcript of Wolsey's Letters ; for, in your hand, I can read them. I will not have them but by some very safe conveyance, and will return them with equal care. I can have no objection to Robin Masters being wooden- head of the Antiquarian Society; but, I suppose, he is not dignified enough for them. I should prefer the Judge too, be cause a coif makes him more like an old woman, and I reckon that Society the midwives of superannuated miscarriages. I am grieved for the return of your head-aches — I doubt you write too much. Yours most sincerely. P. S. It will be civil to tell Dr. Farmer that I do not know whether I can obey his commands ; but that I will if I can. As to a distinguished place, I beg not to be preferred to much better authors ; nay, the more conspicuous, the more hkely to be stolen for the reasons I have given you, of there being few complete sets, and true collectors are mighty apt to steal. TO SIR DAVID DALRYMPLE.* Dec. 11, 1780. I SHOULD have been shamefully ungrateful. Sir, if I could ever forget aU the favours I have received from you, and had omitted any mark of respect to you that it was in my power to show. Indeed, what you are so good as to thank me for was a poor trifie, but it was all I had or shall have of the kind. It was imperfect too, as some painters of name have died since it was printed, which was nine years ago. They will be added with your kind notices, should I live, ' Now first collected. 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 101 which is not probable, to see a new edition wanted. Sixty- three years, and a great deal of illness, are too speaking me mentos not to be attended to ; and when the pubhc has been more indulgent than one had any right to expect, it is not decent to load it with one's dotage ! I believe. Sir, that I may have been over-candid to Hogarth, and that his spirit and youth and talent may have hurried him into more real caricatures than I specified; yet he cer tainly restrained his bent that way pretty early. Charteris' I have seen; but though some years older than you. Sir, I cannot say I have at all a perfect idea of him : nor did I ever hear the curious anecdote you tell me of the banker and my father. I was much better acquainted with Archbishop Black- bourne. He lived within two doors of my father in Downing- street, and took much notice of me when I was near man. It is not to be ungrateful and asperse him, but to amuse you, if I give you some account of him from what I remember.* He was perfectly a fine gentleman to the last, to eighty-four; his favourite a.uthor was Waller, whom he frequently quoted. In point of decorum, he was not quite so exact as you have been told, Sir. I often dined with him, his mistress, Mrs. Con wys, sat at the head of the table, and Hayter,^ his natural son by another woman, and very like him, at the bottom, as chap lain : he was afterwards Bishop of London. I have heard, but do not affirm it, that Mrs. Blackbourne, before she died, complained of Mrs. Conwys being brought under the same roof. To his clergy he was, I have heard, very imperious. * The notorious Colonel Francis Charteris, to whom Hogarth has ac corded a conspicuous place in the first plate of his Harlot's Progress. Pope describes him as " a man infamous for all manner of vices," and thus introduces him into his third Moral Essay : — " Riches in effect, No grace of Heav'n, or token of th' Elect ; Given to the fool, the mad, the vain, the evil. To Ward, to Waters, Chartres, and the devil ! " He died in Scotland, in 1731, at the age of sixty-two. The populace, at his funeral, raised a great riot, almost tore the body out of the coffin, and east dead dogs, &c. into the grave along with it. — E. " See the note to vol. i. p. 267. — E. * For a refutation of Walpole's assertion, that Bishop Hayter was a natural sou of Archbishop Blackbourn's, see vol. u. p. 383. — E. 102 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780. One story I recollect, which showed how much he was a man of this world ; and which the Queen herself repeated to my father. On the King's last journey to Hanover, before Lady Yarmouth came over, the Archbishop being with her Majesty, said to her, « Madam, I have been with your minister Wal pole, and he tehs me that you are a wise woman, and do not mind your husband's having a mistress." He was a httle hurt at not being raised to Canterbury on Wake's death, and said to my father, " You did not think on me ; but it is true, I am too old, I am too old." Perhaps, Sir, these are gossiping stories, but at least they hurt nobody now. I can say httle. Sir, for my stupidity or forgetifulness about Hogarth's poetry, which I still am not sure I ever heard, though I knew him so well; but it is an additional argument for my distrusting myself, if my memory fails, which is very possible. A whole volume of Richardson's poetry has been published since my volume was printed, not much to the honour of his muse, but exceedingly so to that of his piety and amiable heart. You will be pleased, -too. Sir, with a story Lord Chesterfield told me (too late too) of Jervas, who piqued^himself on the reverse, on total infidelity. One day that he had talked very indecently in that strain. Dr. Arbuth- not, who was as devout as Richardson, said to him, " Come, Jervas, this is all an air and affectation ; nobody is a sounder believer than you." "I!" said Jervas, "I believe nothing." " Yes, but you do," replied the Doctor ; " nay, you not only believe, but practise: you are so scrupulous an observer of the commandments, that you never make the likeness of any thing that is in heaven, or on the earth beneath, or," &c. I fear. Sir, this letter is too long for thanks, and that I have been proving what I have said, of my growing superannuated ; but having made my will in my last volume, you may look on this as a codicil. P. S. I had sealed my letter. Sir, but break it open, lest you should think soon, that I do not know what I say, or break my resolution lightly. I shall be able to send you in about two months a very curious work that I am going to print and is actually in the press ; but there is not a syllable 1780. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 103 of my writing in it. It is a discovery just made of two very ancient manuscripts, copies of which were found in two or three libraries in Germany, and of which there are more com plete manuscripts at Cambridge. They are of the eleventh century at lowest, and prove that painting in oil was then known, above three hundred years before the pretended in vention of Van Eyck. The manuscripts themselves will be printed, with a full introductory Dissertation by the discoverer, Mr. Raspe, a very learned German, formerly librarian to the Landgrave of Hesse, and who writes English surprisingly well. The manuscripts are in the most barbarous monkish Latin, and are much such works as our booksellers publish of receipts for mixing colours, varnishes, &c. One of the authors, who calls himself Theophilus, was a monk ; the other, Hera- chus, is totally unknown ; but the proofs are unquestionable. As my press is out of order, and that besides it would take up too much time to print them there, they will be printed here at my expence, and if there is any surplus, it will be for Raspe's benefit TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, Dec. 19, 1780. I CANNOT leave you for a moment in error, my good Sir, when you transfer a compliment to me, to which I have not the most slender claim, and defraud another of it to whom it is due. The friend of Mr. Gray, in whom authorship caused no jealousy or variance, as Mr. Mainwaring says truly, is Mr. Mason. / certainly never excelled in poetry, and never at tempted the species of poetry alluded to, odes. Dr. Lort I sup pose, is removing to a living or a prebend, at least ; I hope so. He may run a risk if he carries his book to Lambeth. " Sono senate venti tre ore e mezza," as Alexander VIII. said to his nephew, when he was chosen Pope in extreme old age. My Lord of Canterbury's is not extreme, but very tottering. I found in Mr. Gough's new edition, that in the Pepysian Ii- 104 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1781. brary is a view of the theatre in Dorset Gardens, and views of four or five other ancient great mansions. Do the folk of Magdalen ever suffer copies of such things to be taken ? If they would, is there anybody at Cambridge that could execute them, and reasonably ? Answer me quite at your leisure ; and, also, what and by whom the altar-piece is, that Lord Carlisle has given to King's. I did not know he had been of our col lege. I have two or three plates of Strawberry more than those you mention ; but my collections are so numerous, and from various causes my prints have been in such confusion, that at present I neither know where the plates or proofs are. I intend next summer to set about completing my plan of the Catalogue and its prints ; and, when I have found any of the plates or proofs, you shall certainly have those you want There are the two large views of the house, one of the cottage, one of the library, one of the front to the road, and the chim ney-piece in the Holbein room. I think these are all that are finished — oh ! yes, I believe the prior's garden ; but I have not seen them these two years. I was so ill the summer before last, that I attended to nothing ; the little I thought of in that way last summer, was to get out my last volume of the Anecdotes ; now I have nothing to trouble myself about as an editor, and that not publicly, but to finish my Catalogue — and that will be awkwardly enough ; for so many articles have been added to my collection since the description was made, that I must add them in the appendix, or reprint it; and, what is more inconvenient the positions of many of the pictures have been changed ; and so it will be a lame piece of work. Adieu, my dear Sir ! Yours most cordially. TO SIR DAVID DALRYMPLE.* Berkeley Square, Jan. 1, 1781. Your favourable opinion of my father. Sir, is too flatter ing to me not to thank you for the satisfaction it gave me. Wit, I think, he had not naturally, though I am sure he had ' Now first pubUshed. 1781. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 105 none from affectation, as simplicity was a predominant feature in his amiable composition ; but he possessed that perhaps, most true species of wit, which flows from experience and deep knowledge of mankind, and consequently had more in his later than in his earlier years; which is not common to a talent that generally flashes from spirits, though they alone cannot bestow it. When you was once before so good. Sir, as to suggest to me an attempt at writing my father's life, I pro bably made you one answer that I must repeat now, which is, that a son's encomiums would be attributed to partiality ; and, with my deep devotion to his memory, I should ever suspect it in myself. But I will set my repugnance in a stronger light, by relating an anecdote not incurious. In the new edi tion of the Biographia Britannica, Dr. Kippis, the tinker of it, reflecting on my having called the former, Vindicatio Britan nica, or Defence of Everybody, threatened that when he should come to my father's life he would convince me that the new edition did not deserve that censure. I confess I thought this but an odd sort of historian equity, to reverse scripture and punish the sins of children upon their fathers ! However, I said nothing. Soon after Dr. Kippis himself called on me, and in very gracious terms desired I would favour him with anecdotes of my father's life. This was descending a little from his censorial throne, but I took no notice ; and only told him, that I was so persuaded of the fairness of my father's character, that I chose to trust it to the most unprejudiced hands ; and that all I could consent to was, that when he shall have written it if he would communicate it to me, I would point out to him any material facts, if I should find any, that were not truly noted. This was all I could contribute. Since that time I have seen in the second volume a very gross accu sation of Sir Robert, at second or third hand, and to which the smallest attention must give a negative. Sir Robert is accused of having, out of spite, influenced the House of Com mons to expel the late Lord Barrington for the notorious job of the Hamburg lottery.* Spite was not the ingredient most domineering in my father's character ; but whatever has been ' Seearaie, p. 17.— E. 106 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1781. said of the corruption or servility of Houses of Commons, when was there one so prostitute, that it would have expelled one of their own members for a fraud not proved, to gratify the vengeance of the minister? and a minister must have been implacable indeed, and a House of Commons profligate indeed, to inflict such a stigma on an innocent man, because he had been attached to a rival predecessor of the minister. It is not less strange that the Hamburgher's son should not have vindicated his parent's memory at the opportunity of the secret committee on Sir Robert, but should wait for a manuscript memorandum of Serjeant Skinner after the death of this last I hope Sir Robert will have no such apologist ! I do not agree less with you. Sir, in your high opinion of King Wilham. I think, and a far better judge. Sir Robert thought that Prince one of the wisest men that ever lived. Your bon-mot of his was quite new to me. There are two or three passages in the Diary of the second Earl of Clarendon that always struck me as instances of wisdom and humour at once ; particularly his Majesty's reply to the lords who advised him (I think at Salisbury) to send away King James; and his few words, after long patience, to that foolish lord himself, who harangued him on the observance of his declaration. Such traits, and several of Queen Anne (not equally deep) in the same journal, paint those Princes as characteristically as Lord Clarendon's able father would have drawn them. There are two letters in the " Nugae Antiquse" that exhibit as faith ful pictures of Queen Elizabeth and James the First, by de lineating them in their private life and unguarded hours. You are much in the right. Sir, in laughing at those wise personages, who not only dug up the corpse of Edward the First, but restored Christian burial to his crown and robes. Methinks, had they deposited those regalia in the treasury of the church, they would have committed no sacrilege. I con fess I have not quite so heinous an idea of sacrilege as Dr. Johnson. Of aU kinds of robbery, that appears to me the hghtest species which injures nobody. Dr. Johnson is so pious, that in his journey to your country, he flatters himseh" 1781. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 107 that all his readers will join him in enjoying the destruction of two Dutch crews, who were swallowed up by the ocean after they had robbed a church.* I doubt that uncharitable anathema is more in the spirit of the Old Testament than of the New. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. January 3, 1781. After I had written my note to you last night, I called on ***** *, who gave me the dismal account of Jamaica, '^ that you will see in the Gazette, and of the damage done to our shipping. Admiral Rowley is safe ; but they are in ap prehensions for Walsingham. He told me too what is not in the Gazette ; that of the expedition against the Spanish set tlements, not a single man survives ! The papers to-day, I see, speak of great danger to Gibraltar. Your brother repeated to me his great desire that you should publish your speech,* as he told you. I do not con ceive why he is so eager for it, for he professes total despair about America. It looks to me as if there was a wish of throwing the blame somewhere ; but I profess I am too simple to dive into the objects of shades of intrigues : nor do I care about them. We shall be reduced to a miserable little island ; ' The following are Johnson's words : — " The two churches of Elgin were stripped, and the lead was shipped to be sold in Holland : I hope every reader wiU rejoice, that this cargo of sacrUege was lost at sea." — E. ' On the 3rd of October occurred one of the most dreadful hurricanes ever experienced in the West Indies. In Jamaica, Savannah La Mar, with three hundred inhabitants, was utterly swept away by an irruption of the sea; and at Barbadoes, on the lOth, Bridge-town, the capital of the island, was almost levelled to the ground, and several thousands of the inhabitants perished. — E. ' Introductory of a motion " for leave to bring in a bUl for quieting the troubles that have for some time subsisted between Great Britain and America, and enabling his Majesty to send out commissioners with fuU power to treat with America for that purpose." The motion was negatived by 123 against 81. For the speech of General Conway, and a copy of his proposed bill, see Pari. History, vol. xxi. pp. S70. S88.— E. 108 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1781. and from a mighty empire sink into as insignificant a country as Denmark or Sardinia ! When our trade and marine are gone, the latter of which we keep up by unnatural efforts, to which our debt will put a stop, we shall lose the East Indies as Portugal did ; and then France will dictate to us more im periously than ever we did to Ireland, which is in a manner already gone too ! These are mortifying reflections, to which an Enghsh mind cannot easily accommodate itself But, alas ! we have been pursuing the very conduct that France would have prescribed, and more than with all her presump tion she could have dared to expect Could she fiatter herself that we would take no advantage of the dilatoriness and un willingness of Spain to enter into the war ? that we would re ject the disposition of Russia to support us ? and that our still more natural friend, Holland,* would be driven into the league against us ? All this has happened ; and, like an infant, we are delighted with having set our own frock in a blaze ! I sit and gaze with astonishment at our phrenzy. Yet why ? Are not nations as liable to intoxication as individuals ? Are not predictions founded on calculation oftener rejected than the prophecies of dreamers ? Do we not act precisely like Charles Fox, who thought he had discovered a new truth in figures, when he preached that wise doctrine, that nobody could want money that would pay enough for it ? The consequence was, that in two years he left himself without the possibility of borrowing a shilling. I am not surprised at the spirits of a boy of parts ; I am not surprised at the people ; I do wonder at government that games away its consequence. For what are we now really at war with America, France, Spain, and Holland? — Not with hopes of reconquering America; not with the smallest prospect of conquering a foot of land from ' Mr. Henry Lawrens, president of the American councU, having been taken by one of the King's frigates early in October 1780, on his passage to HoUand, and it being discovered by the papers in his possession that the American States had been long carrying on a secret correspondence with Amsterdam, Sir Joseph Yorke, the British minister at the Hague, demanded a satisfactory explanation ; but the same not being afforded, hostiUties against HoUand were declared on the 28th of December 1780.— E. 1781. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 109 France, Spain, or Holland. — No; we are at war on the defensive, to protect what is left, or more truly to stave off, for a year perhaps, a peace that must proclaim our naked ness and impotence. I would not willingly recur to that womanish vision of, something may turn up in our favour ! That something must be a naval victory that will annihilate at once all the squadrons of Europe — must wipe off forty millions of new debt — reconcile the affections of America, that for six years we have laboured to alienate; a;nd that must recall out of the grave the armies and sailors that are perished — and that must make thirteen provinces willing to receive the law, without the necessity of keeping ten thou sand men amongst them. The gigantic imagination of Lord Chatham would not entertain such a chimera. Lord * * * * perhaps would say he did, rather than not undertake; or Mr. Burke could form a metaphoric vision that would satisfy no imagination but his own : but I, who am nullius addictus jurare in verba, have no hopes either in our resources or in our geniuses, and look on my country already as undone ! It is grievous — but I shall not have much time to lament its fall!* TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, Feb, 7, 1781. DEAR SIR, I WILL not leave you a moment in suspense about the safety of your very valuable volume, which you have so kindly sent me, and which I have just received, with the enclosed letters, and your other yesterday. I have not time to add a word more at present, being full of business, having the * To this passage the editor of Walpole's works subjoined, in March 1798, the foUowing note : — " It may be some comfort, in a moment no less portentous and melancholy than the one here described, to recoUect the almost unhoped-for recovery of national prosperity, which took place from the peace of 1782 to the declaration of war against France in the year 1793. May our exertions procure the speedy application of a simi lar remedy to our present evils, and may that remedy be productive of equaUy good effects ! " — E. 110 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1781. night before last received an account of Lady Orford's death at Pisa,* and a copy of her will, which obhges me to write several letters, and to see my relations. She has left every thing in her power to her Jriend Cavaher Mozzi, at Florence ; but her son comes into a large estate, besides her great join ture. You may imagine, how I lament that he had not patience to wait sixteen months, before he sold his pictures ! I am very sorry you have been at all indisposed. I will take the utmost care of your fifty-ninth volume (for which I give you this receipt), and will restore it the instant I have had time to go through it Witness my hand. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. February 9, 1781. I HAD not time, dear Sir, when I wrote last to answer your letter, nor do more than cast an eye on your manuscript. To say the truth, my patience is not tough enough to go through Wolsey's negotiations. I see that your perseverance was forced to make the utmost efforts to transcribe them. They are immeasurably verbose, not to mention the blunders of the first copyist As I read only for amusement I cannot, so late in my life, purchase information on what I do not much care about at the price of a great deal of ennui. The old wills at the end of your volume diverted me much more than the obsolete pohtics. I shall say nothing about what you call your old leaven. Everybody must judge for himself in those matters : nor are you or I of an age to change long- formed opinions, as neither of us is governed by self-interest Pray tell me how I may most safely return your volume. I value all your manuscripts so much, that I should never for give myself, if a single one came to any accident, by your so obligingly lending them to me. They are great treasures, and contain something or other that must suit most tastes : not to mention your amazing industry, neatness, legibihty, ' See vol. i. p. 170. — E. 1781. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. Ill with notes, arms, &c. — I know no such repositories. You will receive with your manuscript Mr. Kerrick's and Mr. Gough's letters. The former is very kind. The inaugu ration of the Antiquated Society is burlesque — and so is their dearth of materials for another volume : can they ever want such rubbish as compose their preceding annals ? I think it probable, that story should be stone: however, I never piqued myself on recording every mason. I have preserved but too many that did not deserve to be men tioned. I dare to say, that when I am gone, many more such will be added to my volumes. I had not heard of poor Mr. Pennant's misfortune. I am very sorry for it, for I beheve him to be a very honest good-natured man. He cer tainly was too lively for his proportion of understanding, and too impetuous to make the best use of what he had. How ever, it is a credit to us antiquaries to have one of our class disordered by vivacity. I hope your goutiness is dissipated, and that this last fine week has set you on your feet again. TO THE EARL OF BUCHAN.* Berkeley Square, Feb. 10, 1781. I WAS honoured yesterday with your lordship's card, with the notification of the additional honour of my being elected an honorary member of the Society of the Antiquaries of Scotland ; ^ a grace, my lord, that I receive with the respect and gratitude due to so valuable a distinction ; and for which I must beg leave, through your lordship's favour, to offer my most sincere and humble thanks to that learned and re spectable Society. My very particular thanks are still more due to your lord ship, who, in remembrance of ancient partiality, have been pleased, at the hazard of your own judgment, to favour an old ' Now first printed. ° The Royal Society of Antiquaries of Scotland had been formed at Edinburgh in the preceding December, when the Earl of Buchan was elected president. — £. 112 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1781. humble servant, who can only receive honour from, but can reflect none on, the Society into which your lordship and your associates have condescended to adopt him. In my best days, my lord, I never could pretend to more than having flitted over some flowers of knowledge. Now worn out and near the end of my course, I can only be a broken monument to prove that the Society of the Antiquaries of Scotland are zealous to preserve even the least valuable remains of a former age, and to recompense all who have contributed their mite towards illustrating our common island. I am, &c. TO SIR DAVID DALRYMPLE.* Strawberry HiU, Feb. 10, 1781. I WAS very intimate. Sir, with the last Lord Finlater when he was Lord Deskfoord. We became acquainted at Rome on our travels, and though, during his illness and long residence in Scotland, we had no intercourse, I had the honour of seeing him sometimes during his last visit to Eng land; but I am an entire stranger to the anecdote relative to my father and Sir William Windham. I have asked my brother, who was much more conversant in the scenes of that time ; for I was abroad when Sir William died, and returned to England but about six months before my father's retire ment so that having been at school and at Cambridge, or in my infancy, during Sir Robert's administration, the little I retain from him was picked up in the last three years of his life, which is an answer. Sir, to your inquiries why, among other reasons, I have always declined writing his life ; for I could in reality say but httle on my own knowledge ; and yet should have the air of being good authority, at least better than I should truly be. My brother. Sir Edward, who is eleven years older than I am, never heard of your anecdote. I may add, that latterly I lived in great intimacy with the Marchioness of Blandford, Sir William's widow, who died ' Now first collected. 1781. THE HON. HOIJACE WALPOLE. 113 but a year and a half ago at Sheene, here in my neighbour hood; and with Lady Suffolk, who could not but be well acquainted with the history of those times from her long residence at court, and with whom, for the last five or six years of her life here at Twickenham, I have had many and many long conversations on those subjects, and yet I never heard a word of the supposed event you mention. I myself never heard Sir W. Windham speak but once in the House of Commons, but have always been told that his style and behaviour were most hberal and like a gentleman; and my brother says, there never passed any bitterness or acrimony between him and our father.* I will answer you as fairly and candidly. Sir, about Archi bald Duke of Argyll, of whom I saw at least a great deal. I do believe Sir Robert had a full opinion of his abilities as a most usefiil man. In fact, it is plain he had; for he de pended on the Duke, when Lord Islay, for the management of your part of the island, and, as I have heard at the time, disobhged the most firm of the Scottish Whigs by that pre ference. Sir Robert supported Lord Islay against the Queen herself, who hated him for his attachment to Lady Suffolk; and he was the only man of any consequence whom her Majesty did not make feel how injudicious it was (however novel) to prefer the interest of the mistress to that of the wife. On my father's defeat his warm friends loudly complained of Lord Islay as having betrayed the Scottish boroughs, at the elec tion of Sir Robert's last Parliament, to his brother, Duke John. It is true too, that Sir Robert always replied, " I do not accuse him." I must own, knowing my father's man- ' Pope, in his second Dialogue for the Year 1738, has transmitted Sir WiUiam's character to posterity — " How can I, Pult'ney, Chesterfield, forget, WhUe Roman spirit charms, and Attic wit } Or Wyndham, just to freedom and the throne. The master of our passions and his own ? " Speaker Onslow says, " there was a spirit and power in his speaking that always animated himself and his hearers, and with the decoration of his manner, which was, indeed, very ornamental, produced, not only the most attentive, respectful, but even a reverend regard, to whatever he spoke."— E. VOL. VI. 1 114 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1781. ner, and that when he said but little, it was not a favourable symptom, I did think, that if he would not accuse, at least he did not acquit. Duke Archibald was undoubtedly a dark shrewd man. I recollect an instance, for which I should not chuse to be quoted just at this moment though it reflects on nobody living. I forget the precise period, and even some of the persons concerned ; but it was in the minority of the pre sent Duke of Gordon, and you. Sir, can probably adjust the dates. A regiment had been raised of Gordons. Duke Ar chibald desired the command of it to a favourite of his own. The Duchess-dowager insisted on it for her second husband. Duke A. said, " Oh ! to be sure her grace must be obeyed ;" but instantly got the regiment ordered to the East Indies, which had not been the reckoning of a widow remarried to a young fellow.* At the time of the rebelhon, I remember that Duke Ar chibald was exceedingly censured in London for coming thi ther, and pleading that he was not empowered to take up arms. But I believe I have more than satisfied your curiosity, Sir, and that you will not think it very prudent to set an old man on talking of the days of his youth. I have just received the favour of a letter from Lord Buchan, in which his lordship is so good as to acquaint me with the honour your new Society of Antiquarians have done me in nominating me an honorary member. I am certainly much flattered by the distinction, but am afraid his lordship's par tiality and patronage will in this only instance do him no credit. My knowledge even of British antiquity has ever been desultory and most superficial ; I have never studied any branch of science deeply and solidly, nor ever but for tem- • See Memoires of George the Second, vol. i. p. 240. " In his private life," says Walpole, " he had more merit, except in the case of his wife, whom, having been deluded into marrying without a fortune, he pu nished by rigorous and unrelaxed confinement in Scotland. He had a great thirst for books ; a head admirably turned to mechanics ; was a patron of ingenious men, a promoter of discoveries, and one of the first great encouragers of planting in England; most of the curious exotics which have been familiarized to this climate being introduced by him. He died suddenly in his chair after dinner, at his house in Argyle-build- ings, London, AprU 15, 1761." — E. 1781. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 115 porary amusement, and without any system, suite, or method. Of late years I have quitted every connection with societies, not only Parhament, but those of our Antiquaries and of Arts and Sciences, and have not attended the meetings of the Royal Society. I have withdrawn myself in a great measure from the world, and live in a very narrow circle idly and ob scurely. Still, Sir, I could not decline the honour your Society has been pleased to offer me, lest it should be thought a want of respect and gratitude, instead of a mark of humility and conscious unworthiness. I am so sensible of this last, that I cannot presume to offer my services in this part of our island to so respectable an assembly; but if you, Sir, who know too well my limited abilities, can at any time point out any information that is in my power to give to the Society, (as in the case of Royal Scottish portraits, on which Lord Buchan was pleased to consult me,) I shall be very proud to obey your and their commands, and shall always be with great regard their and your most obedient humble servant. P. S. I do not know whether I ever mentioned to you or Lord Buchan, Sir, a curious and excellent head in oil of the Lady Margaret Douglas at Mr. Carteret's, at Hawnes in Bed fordshire, the seat of his grandfather Lord Granville ; I know few better portraits. It is at once a countenance of goodness and cunning, a mixture I think pleasing. It seems to imply that the person's virtue was not founded on folly or ignorance of the world ; it imphes perhaps more, that the person would combat treachery and knavery, and knew how. I could fancy the head in question was such a character as Margaret Queen of Navarre, sister of Francis the First, who was very free in her conversation and writings, yet strictly virtuous ; debonnaire, void of ambition ; yet a politician when her brother's situation required it If your Society should give into engraving histo ric portraits, this head would deserve an early place. There is at Lord Scarborough's, in Yorkshire, a double portrait, per haps by Holbein or Lucas de Heere, of Lady Margaret's mother, Queen Margaret and her second husband. I 2 116 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1781. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. DEAR SIR, Berkeley Square, March 2, 1781. My Lady Orford ordered herself to be buried at Leghorn, the only place in Tuscany where Protestants have burial; therefore I suppose she did not affect to change. On the contrary, I believe she had no preference for any sect, but rather laughed at all. I know nothing new, neither in no velty nor antiquitj'. I have had no gout this winter, and therefore I call it my leap-year. I am sorry it is not yours too. It is an age since I saw Dr. Lort. I hope illness is not the cause. You will be diverted with hearing that I am chosen an honorary member of the new Antiquarian Society at Edinburgh. I accepted for two reasons : first, it is a feather that does not demand my fiying thither; and secondly, to show contempt for our own old fools.* To me it will be a perfect sinecure ; for I have moulted all my pen feathers, and shall have no ambition of neStling into their printed trans actions. Adieu, my good Sir. Your much obhged. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. March S, 1781. I DO not in the least guess or imagine what you mean by Lord Hardwicke's pubhcation of a Walpoliana.^ Naturally it should mean a collection of sayings or anecdotes of my father, according to the French Anas, which began, I think, with those of Menage. Or, is it a cohection of letters and state-papers during his administration ? I own I am curious to know at least what this piece contains. I had not heard * Cole, in a letter to Mr. Gough, acquainting him with Walpole's elec tion, adds — " The admission of a few things into our Archaeologia, has, I fear, estranged for ever one of the most Uvely, learned, and entertain ing members on our list." — E. ' " WalpoUana; or a few Anecdotes of Sir Robert Walpole"— an agreeable little coUection of anecdotes relative to Sir Robert Walpole, made by PhUip second Earl of Hardwicke ; printed in quarto, but never pubUshed.— E. 1781. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 117 a word of it ; and, were it not for the name, I should have very little inquisitiveness about it: for nothing upon earth ever was duller than the three heavy tomes his lordship printed of Sir Dudley Carleton's Negotiations, and of what he called State-papers. Pray send me an answer as soon as you can, at least of as much as you have heard about this thing. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, March 29, 1781. You are so good-natured that I am sure you will be glad to be told that the report of Mr. Pennant being dis ordered is not true. He is come to town — has been with me, and at least is as composed as ever I saw him. He is going to pubhsh another part of his Welch Tour, which he can well afford; though I beheve he does not lose by his works. An aunt is dead exceedingly rich, who had given some thousands to him and his daughter, but suddenly changed her mind and left all to his sister, who has most nobly given him all that had been destined in the cancelled will. Dr. Nash has just published the first volume of his Worcestershire. It is a folio of prodigious corpulence, and yet dry enough ; but then it is finely dressed, and has many heads and views.* Dr. Lort was with me yesterday, and I never saw him better, nor has he been much out of order. I hope your gout has left you; but here are winds bitter enough to give one anything. Yours ever. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. AprU 3, 1781. I AM very sorry, dear Sir, that in my last letter but one, I took no notice of what you said about Lord Hardwicke; 4 ' Dr. Threadway Nash's " Collections for the History of Worcester shire;" 1781-1799 ; in two volumes, foUo. — E. 118 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1781. the truth was, I am perfectly indifferent about what he prints or pubhshes. There is generally a httle indirect malice, but so much more duhness, that the latter soon suffocates the former. This is telling you that I could not be offended at anything you said of him, nor am I hkely to suspect a sin cere friend of disobliging me. You have proved the direct contrary these forty years. I have not time to say more, but am ever most truly yours. TO THE REV. MR. COLE. Berkeley Square, May 4, 1781. I SHALL not only be ready to show Strawberry Hill, at any time he chooses, to Dr. Farmer, as your friend, but to be honoured with his acquaintance, though I am very shy now of contracting new. I have great respect for his character and abihties and judicious taste, and am very clear that he has elucidated Shakspeare* in a more reasonable and satis factory manner than any of his affected commentators, who only complimented him with learning that he had not, in order to display their own. Pray give me timely notice whenever I am likely to see Dr. Farmer, that I may not be out of the way when I can have an opportunity of showing attention to a friend of yours, and pay a small part of your gratitude to him. There shall be a bed at his service ; for you know Strawberry cannot be seen in a moment, nor are Englishmen so Hants as to get acquainted in the time they are walking through a house. But now, my good Sir, how could you suffer your preju diced partiality to me to run away with you so extravagantly, as to call me one of the greatest characters of the age ? You are too honest to fiatter, too much a hermit to be interested, and I am too powerless and insignificant to be an object of court, were you capable of paying it from mercenary views. I know then that it could proceed from nothing but the ' In his weU-known " Essay on the Learning of Shakspeare." — E. 1781. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 119 warmth of your heart; but if you are blind towards me, I I am not so to myself. I know not how others feel on such occasions, but if any one happens to praise me, all my faults rush into my face, and make me turn my eyes inward and outward with horror. What am I but a poor old skeleton tottering towards the grave, and conscious of ten thousand weaknesses, follies, and worse ! And for talents, what are mine, but trifling and superficial ; and, compared with those of men of real genius, most diminutive ! Mine a great character ! Mercy on me ! I am a composition of Anthony Wood and Madame Danois,* and I know not what trumpery writers. This is the least I can say to refute your panegyric, which I shall burn presently ; for I will not have such an encomiastic letter found in my possession, lest I should seem to have been pleased with it. I enjoin you, as a penance, not to contra dict one tittle I have said here ; for I am not begging more compliments, and shall take it seriously ill if you ever pay me another. We have been friends above forty years ; I am satisfied of your sincerity and affection ; but does it become us, at past threescore each, to be saying fine things to one another ? Consider how soon we shall both be nothing I I assure you, with great truth, I am at this present very sick of my httle vapour of fame. My tragedy has wandered into the hands of some banditti booksellers, and I am forced to pubhsh it myself to prevent piracy.^ All I can do is to condemn it myself, and that I shall. I am reading Mr. Pen nant's new Welch Tour ; he has pleased me by making very handsome mention of you; but I will not do what I have been blaming. My poor dear Madame du Deffand's little dog is arrived. She made me promise to take care of it the last time I saw her: that I will most rehgiously, and make it as happy as ' Madame d'Aulnoy, the contemporary of Perrault, and, like him, a writer of fairy tales. She was the authoress of " The Lady's Travels in Spain," and many other works, which have been translated into Eng Ush.— E. " Walpole had printed fifty copies of " The Mysterious Mother " at Strawberry Hill as early as the year 1765; but a surreptitious edition of it being announced in 1781, he consented to Dodsley's publishing a ge nuine one. — E. 120 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1781. is possible.* I have not much curiosity to see your Cambridge Raphael, but great desire to see you, and will certainly this summer accept your invitation, which I take much kinder than your great character, though both flowed from the same friendship. Mine for you is exactly what it has been ever since you knew (and few men can boast so uninterrupted a friendship as yours and that of — ) H. W. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry HUl, Sunday evening. May 6, 1781. I SUPPED with your Countess on Friday at Lord Frede rick Campbell's, where I heard of the rehef of Gibraltar by Darby. The Spanish fleet kept close in Cadiz : however, he lifted up his leg, and just squirted contempt on them. As he is disembarrassed of his transports, I suppose their ships will scramble on shore rather than fight Well, I shall be per fectly content with our fleet coming back in a whole skin; it will be enough to have outquixoted Don Quixote's own, nation. As I knew your Countess would write the next day, I waited till she was gone out of town and would not have much to tell you — not that I have either; and it is giving myself an air to pretend to know more at Twickenham than she can at Henley. Though it is a bitter north-east, I came hither to-day to look at my lilacs, though a la glace ; and to get from pharaoh, for which there is a rage. I doted on it above thirty years ago ; but it is not decent to sit up all night now with boys and girls. My nephew, Lord Cholmondeley, the banker d h. mode, has been demohshed. He and his ' In his reply to this letter, of the 7th of May, the worthy antiquary says — " I congratulate the little Parisian dog, that he has fallen into the hands of so humane a master. I have a little diminutive dog, Busy, fuU as great a favourite, and never out of my lap : I have already, in case of an accident, ensured it a refuge from starvation and ill-usage. It is the least we can do for poor harmless, shiftless, pampered animals that have amused us, and we have spoUt." A brother antiquary, on reading this passage, exclaimed, " How could Mr. Cole ever get through the tran script of a Bishop's Registry, or a Chartulary, with Busy never out of hislap!"— E. 1781. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 121 associate. Sir Willoughby Aston, went early t'other night to Brookes's, before Charles Fox and Fitzpatrick, who keep a bank there, were come ; but they soon arrived, attacked their rivals, broke their bank, and won above four thousand pounds. "There," said Fox, "so should all usurpers be served!" He did still better; for he sent for his tradesmen, and paid as far as the money would go. In the mornings he continues his war on Lord North, but cannot break that bank. The court has carried a secret committee for India affairs, and it is supposed that Rumbold is to be the sacrifice; but as he is near as rich as Lord Clive, I conclude he will escape by the same golden key. I told you in my last that Tonton was arrived. I brought him this morning to take possession of his new villa, but his inauguration has not been at all pacific. As he has already found out that he may be as despotic as at Saint Joseph's, he began vrith exiling my beautiful little cat; upon which, how ever, we shall not quite agree. He then flew at one of my dogs,* who returned it by biting his foot till it bled, but was severely beaten for it I immediately rung for Margaret,^ to dress his foot; but in the midst of my tribulation could not keep my countenance ; for she cried, " Poor little thing, he does not understand my language I" I hope she will not re collect too that he is a Papist ! Berkeley Square, Tuesday, May 8. I came before dinner, and find your long letter of the 3rd. You have mistaken Tonton's sex, who is a cavaher, and a httle of the mousquetaire still; but if I do not correct his vi vacities, at least I shall not encourage them like my dear old friend. You say nothing of your health; therefore, I trust it is quite re-established: my own is most flourishing for me. ' This does not quite accord with the favourable character given of Tonton by Madame du Deffand's secretary, Wyart, in a letter to Wal pole : — " Je garderai," he says, " Tonton jusqu'au depart de M. Thomas Walpole ; j'en ai le plus grand soin. II est tres doux ; U ne mord per- sonne ; il n'dtait m^chant qu'aupres de sa maitresse." — E. ' Mr. Walpole's housekeeper. 122 ' CORRESPONDENCE OF 1781. They say the Parhament will rise by the birthday ; not that it seems to be any grievance or confinement to anybody. I hope you will soon come and enjoy a quiet summer under the laurels of your own conscience. They are at least as spreading as anybody's else ; and the soil will preserve their verdure for ever. Methinks we western powers might as well make peace, since we make war so clumsily. Yet I doubt the awkwardness of our enemies will not have brought down our stomach. WeU, I wish for the sake of mankind there was an end of their sufferings ! Even spectators are not amused — the whole war has passed hke the riotous mur murs of the upper gallery before the play begins — they have pelted the candle-snuffers, the stage has been swept, the music has played, people have taken their places — but the deuce a bit of any performance ! — And when folks go home, they will have seen nothing but a farce, that hast cost fifty times more than the best tragedy ! TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Berkeley Square, May 28, 1781. This letter, like an embarkation, will not set out till it has gotten its complement; but I begin it as I have just received your second letter. I wrote to you two days ago, and did not mean to complain ; for you certainly cannot have variety of matter in your sequestered isle : and since you do not disdain trifling news, this good town, that furnishes nothing else, at least produces weeds, which shoot up in spite of the Scotch thistles, that have choked all good fruits. I do not know what Lady Craven designs to do with her play ; I hope, act it only in private ; for her other was mur dered, and the audience did not exert the least gallantry to so pretty an authoress, though she gave them so fair an op portunity. For my own play, I was going to pubhsh it in my own defence, as a spurious edition was advertised here, besides one in Ireland. My advertisement has overlaid the former for the present, and that tempts me to suppress mine. 1781. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 123 as I have a thorough aversion to its appearance. Still, I think I shall produce it in the dead of summer, that it may be forgotten by winter; for I could not bear having it the subject of conversation in a full town. It is printed; so I can let it steal out in the midst of the first event that en grosses the public ; and as it is not quite a novelty, I have no fear but it will be still-bom, if it is twin with any babe that squalls and makes much noise. At the same time with yours I received a letter from another cousin at Paris, who tells me Necker is on the verge, and in the postscript says, he has actually resigned. I heard so a few days ago ; but this is a full confirmation. Do you remember a conversation at your house, at supper, in which a friend of yours spoke very unfavourably of Necker, and seemed to wish his fall ? In my own opinion they are much in the wrong. It is true, Necker laboured with all his shoulders to restore their finances ; yet I am persuaded that his atten tion to that great object made him clog all their military operations. They will pay dearer for money; but money they will have: nor is it so dear to them, for, when they have gotten it, they have only not to pay. A Monsieur Joly de Fleury is comptroller-general. I know nothing of him; but as they change so often, some able man will prove minister at last — and there they will have the advantage again. Lord CornwaUis's courier, Mr. Broderick, is not yet ar rived; so you are a little precipitate in thinking America so much nearer to being subdued, which you have often swallowed up as if you were a minister ; and yet, methinks, that era has been so frequently put off, that I wonder you are not cured of being sanguine — or rather, of believing the mag nificent lies that every trifling advantage gives birth to. If a quarter of the Americans had joined the Royalists, that have been said to join, all the colonies would not hold them. But, at least, they have been like the trick of kings and queens at cards ; where one of two goes back every turn to fetch another. However, this is only for conversation for the moment With such aversion to disputation, I have 124 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1781. no zeal for making converts to my own opinion, not even on points that touch me nearer. Thursday, May 31. If you see the papers, you will find that there was a warm debate yesterday on a fresh proposal from Hartley* for pa cification with America ; in which the ministers were roundly reproached with their boasts of the returning zeal of the colonies ; and which, though it ought by their own accounts to be so much nearer complete, they could not maintain to be at all effectual; though even yesterday a report was re vived of a second victory of Lord Comwallis. This debate prevented another on the Marriage-bill, which Charles Fox wants to get repealed, and which he told me he was going to labour. I mention this from the circumstance of the moment when he told me so. I had been to see if Lady Ailesbury was come to town : as I came up St. James's- street I saw a cart and porters at Charles's door; coppers and old chests of drawers loading. In short, his success at faro has awakened his host of creditors ; but unless his bank had swelled to the size of the bank of England, it could not have yielded a sop a-piece for each. Epsom, too, had been unpro- pitious ; and one creditor has actually seized and carried off his goods, which did not seem worth removing. As I returned full of this scene, whom should I find sauntering by my own door but Charles? He came up and talked to me at the coach-window, on the Marriage-bill,'^ with as much sang-froid as if he knew nothing of what had happened. I have no ad miration for insensibility to one's own faults, especially when committed out of vanity. Perhaps the whole philosophy con sisted in the commission. If you could have been as much to blame, the last thing you would bear well would be your own reflections. The more marveUous Fox's parts are, the more ' On the preceding day, Mr. Hartley had moved for leave to bring in a biU to invest the Crown with sufficient power to treat upon the means of restoring peace with the provinces of North America. It was negatived by 106 against 72. — E. ' On the 7th of June, Mr. Fox moved for leave to bring in a biU to amend the act of the 26th of George the Second, for preventing clan destine marriages. The biU passed the Commons, but was reiected bv the Lords.— E. 1781. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 125 one is provoked at his follies, which comfort so many rascals and blockheads, and make all that is admirable and amiable in him only matter of regret to those who like him as I do. I did intend to settle at Strawberry on Sunday ; but must return on Thursday, for a party made at Marlborough-house for Princess Ameha. I am continually tempted to retire en tirely ; and should, if I did not see how very unfit English tempers are for living quite out of the world. We grow abo minably peevish and severe on others, if we are not con stantly rubbed against and polished by them. I need not name friends and relations of yours and mine as instances. My prophecy on the short reign of faro is verified already. The bankers find that all the calculated advantages of the game do not balance pinchbeck parolis and debts of honour able women. The bankers, I think, might have had a pre vious and more generous reason, the very bad air of holding a bank : — but this country is as hardened against the petite morale, as against the greater. — What should I think of the world if I quitted it entirely ? TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry HUl, June 3, 1781. You know I have more philosophy about you than cou rage, yet for once I have been very brave. There was an article in the papers last week that said, a letter from Jersey mentioned apprehensions of being attacked by four thousand French. Do you know that I treated the paragraph with scorn .? No, no ; I am not afraid for your island, when you are at home in it, and have had time to fortify it and have sufficient force. No, no ; it will not be surprised when you are there, and when our fleet is returned, and Digby before Brest However, with all my valour, I could not help going to your brother to ask a few questions; but he had heard of no such letter. The French would be foohsh indeed if they ran their heads a third time against your rocks, when watched by the most vigilant of all governors. Your nephew 126 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1781. George* is arrived with the fleet: my door opened t'other morning; I looked towards 'the common horizon of heads, but was a foot and a half below any face. The handsomest giant in the world made but one step cross my room, and seizing my hand, gave it such a robust gripe that I squalled ; for he crushed my poor chalk-stones to powder. When I had recovered from the pain of his friendly salute, I said, " It must be George Conway ! and yet is it possible ? Why, it is not fifteen months ago since you was but six feet high !" In a word, he is within an inch of Robert and Edward, with larger limbs; almost as handsome as Hugh, with all the bloom of youth; and, in short, another of those comely sons of Anak, the breed of which your brother and Lady Hertford have piously restored for the comfort of the daughters of Sion. He is delighted with having tapped his warfare with the siege of Gibraltar, and burns to stride to America. The town, he says, is totally destroyed, and between two and three hundred persons were killed. — Well, it is pity Lady Hertford has done breeding: we shall want such a race to repeople even the ruins we do not lose ! The rising generation does give one some hopes. I confine myself to some of this year's birds. The young Wilham Pitt ^ has again displayed paternal oratory. The other day, on the commission of accounts, he answered Lord North, and tore him hmb from hmb. If ' Lord George Seymour Conway, seventh son of Francis, first Earl and Marquis of Hertford; born in 1763. — E. ^ " The young WilUam Pitt," afterwards, as Walpole anticipated, the proud rival of Charles Fox, and for so long a period the prime-minister of England, deUvered his maiden speech in the House of Commons, on the 26th of February, in favour of Mr. Burke's biU for an economical reform in the civU list. " Never," says his preceptor. Bishop TomUne, " were higher expectations formed of "any person upon his first coming into ParUament, and never were expectations more completely answered. They were, indeed, much more than answered ; such were the fluency and accuracy of language, sueh the perspicuity of arrangement, and sueh the closeness of reasoning, and manly and dignified elocution, — generally, even in a much less degree, the fruits of long habit and experience, that it could scarcely be believed to be the first speech of a young man not yet two-and-twenty. On the foUowing day, knowing my anxiety upon every subject which related to him, Mr. Pitt, with his accustomed kindness, wrote to me at Cambridge, to inform me that ' he had heard his own voice in the House of Commons,' and modestly expressed his satisfaction at the manner in which his first attempt at parliamentary speaking had been received." — E. 1781. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 127 Charles Fox ness on me. The Prince d'Hessenstein has written to offer me a visit — I don't know when. I have just answered his note, and endeavoured to hmit its meaning to the shortest sense I could, by proposing to give him a dinner or a break fast I would keep my bed rather than crack our northern French together for twelve hours. I know nothing upon earth but my own disasters. An other is, that aU yesterday I thought all my gold-fish stolen. I am not sure that they are not ; but they teU me they keep at the bottom of the water from the hot weather. It is all to be laded out to-morrow morning, and then I shall know whether they are gone or boiled. Whenever the weather cools to an English consistence, I will see you at Park-place or in town : but I think not at the former before the end of next month, unless I recover more courage than I have at present; for if I was to get a real fit and be confined to my bed in such sultry days, I should not have strength to go through it I have just fixed three new benches round my bowling-green, that I may make four journeys of the tour. Adieu ! Monday morning. As I was rising this morning, I received an express from your daughter, that she will bring Madame de Cambis and Lady Melbourne to dinner here to-morrow. I shall be vastly pleased with the party, but it puts Philip and Margaret to their wit's end to get them a dinner: nothing is to be had here ; we must send to Richmond, and Kingston, and Brent ford; I must borrow Mr. Elhs's cook, and somebody's con fectioner, and beg somebody's fruit for I have none of these of my own, nor know anything of the matter : but that is Phihp and Margaret's affair, and not mine ; and the worse the dinner is, the more Gothic Madame de Cambis will think it I have been emptying my pond, which was more in my head than the honour of my kitchen ; and in the mud of the troubled water I have found all my gold, as Dunning and Barre did last year.* I have taken out fifteen young fish of ' In the preceding year, through the influence of Lord Shelburne, a 1783. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 199 a year and a half old for Lady Ailesbury, and reserved them as an offering worthy of Amphitrite in the vase, in the cat's vase,* amidst the azure flowers that blow. They are too portly to be , carried in a smelling-bottle in your pocket. I wish you could plan some way of a waterman's calling for them, and transporting them to Henley. They have not changed their colour, but will next year. How lucky it would be, should you meet your daughter about Turnham Green, and turn back with them ! TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Strawberry HUl, Sept. 12, 1783. Your lordship tells me you hope my summer has glided pleasantly, hke our Thames. I cannot say it has passed very pleasantly to me, though, like the Thames, dry and low ; for somehow or other I caught a rheumatic fever in the great heats, and cannot get rid of it. I have just been at Park- place and Nuneham, in hopes change of air would cure me ; but to no purpose. Indeed, as want of sleep is my chief complaint, I doubt I must make use of a very different and more disagreeable remedy, the air of London, the only place that I ever find agree with me when I am out of order. I was there for two nights a fortnight ago, and slept perfectly well. In vain has my predilection for Strawberry made me try to persuade myself that this was all fancy ; but, I fear, reasons that appear strong, though contrary to our inchna- tions, must be good ones. London at this time of year is as nauseous a drug as any in an apothecary's shop. I could find nothing at all to do, and so went to Astley's, which indeed was much beyond my expectation. I do not wonder any longer that Darius was chosen king by the instructions he gave to his horse ; nor that Caligula made his consul. Astley can make his dance minuets and hornpipes ; which is considerable pension had been granted to Colonel Barre, and a peerage and pension to Mr. Dunning. — ^E. * The china vase in which Walpole's favourite cat SeUma was drowned. See Gray's Works, vol. i. p. 6. — E. 200 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1783. more extraordinary than to make them vote at an election, or act the part of a magistrate, which animals of less capa cities can perform as dexterously as a returning officer or a master in chancery.— But I shaU not have even Astley now: her Majesty the Queen of France, who has as much taste as Cahgula, has sent for the whole dramatis persona to Paris. Sir Wilham Hamilton was at Park-place, and gave us dreadful accounts of Calabria: he looks much older, and has the patina of a bronze. At Nuneham I was much pleased with the improvements both within doors and without Mr. Mason was there ; and, as he shines in every art was assisting Mrs. Harcourt with his new discoveries in painting, by which he will unite mi niature and oU. Indeed, she is a very apt and extraordinary scholar. Since our professors seem to have lost the art of colouring, I am glad at least that they have ungraduated assessors. We have plenty and peace at last; consequently leisure for repairing some of our losses, if we have sense enough to set about the task. On what will happen 1 shall make no conjectures, as it is not likely I should see much of what is to come. Our enemies have humbled us enough to content them ; and we have succeeded so ill in innovations, that surely we shall not tempt new storms in haste. From this place I can send your lordship nothing new or entertaining ; nor expect more game in town, whither nothing but search of health should carry me. Perhaps it is a vain chase at my age ; but at my age one cannot trust to Nature's operating cures without aiding her ; it is always time enough to abandon one's self when no care will palliate our decays. I hope your lordship and Lady Strafford will long be in no want of such attentions ; nor should I have talked so much of my own cracks, had I had anything else to tell you. It would be silly to aim at vivacity when it is gone : and, though a lively old man is sometimes an agreeable being, a pretend ing old man is ridiculous. Aches and an apothecary cannot give one genuine spirits; 'tis sufficient if they do not make one peevish. Your lordship is so kind as to accept of me as 1783. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 201 I am, and you shall find nothing more counterfeit in me than the sincere respect and gratitude with which I have the honour to be your lordship's most devoted humble servant TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Strawberry HiU, Oct. 11, 1783. My rheumatism, I thank your lordship, is certainly better, though not quite gone. It was very troublesome at night till I took the bark ; but that medicine makes me sleep like opium. — But I will say no more about it, nothing is so troublesome as to talk of chronical complaints : has one any right to draw on the compassion of others, when one must renew the address daily and for months ? The aspect of Ireland is very tempestuous.* I doubt they will hurt us materially without benefiting themselves. If they obtain very short parliaments, they will hurt themselves more than us, by introducing a confusion that will prevent their improvements. Whatever country does adopt short par haments, will, I am entirely persuaded, be forced to recur to their former practice; I mean, if the disorders introduced do not produce despotism of some sort or other. I am very sorry Mr. Mason concurs in trying to revive the Associations.'^ ' The Volunteer Corps of Ireland had long entertained projects for refoi'ming the parUamentary representation of the country, and had ap pointed delegates for carrying that object into effect. In September they met at Dungannon, when a plan of reform was proposed and agreed upon, and the loth of November fixed on for a Convention at Dublin of the representatives of the whole body of Volunteers. " Many gentlemen," says Mr. Hardy, in his Memoirs of Lord Charlemont, " must have seen a letter of Mr. Fox, then secretary of state, to Gene ral Burgoyne, at that time commander-in-chief in Ireland, on the sub ject of the Convention. It was written with the spirit of a patriot and wisdom of a true statesman. In his ardour for a parUamentary reform, he yielded, he said, to none of the Convention, but he dreaded the con sequences of such a proceeding ; and would, he added, lament it as the deepest misfortune of his life, if, by any untoward steps then taken, and whilst he was minister, the two kingdoms should be separated, or run the sUghtest risk of separation." — E. ' " The Yorkshire Association had been formed in 1779, from the gentry of moderate fortunes and the more substantial yeomen, under the pressure of those burdens which resulted from the war with America, with the view of obtaining, first, an economical, and then a parliament- 202 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1783. Methinks our state is so deplorable, that every healing mea sure ought to be attempted instead of innovations. For my own part, I expect nothing but distractions, and am not con cerned to be so old. I am so old, that were I disposed to novelties, I should think they little became my age. I should be ashamed, when my hour shall come, to be caught in a riot of country 'squires and parsons, and haranguing a mob with a shaking head. A leader of faction ought to be young and vigorous. If an aged gentleman does get an ascendant, he may be sure that younger men are counting on his exit, and only fiatter him to succeed to his infiuence, while they are laughing at his misplaced activity. At least these would be my thoughts, who of all things dread being a jest to the juvenile, if they find me out of my sphere. I have seen Lord Carhsle's play, and it has a great deal of merit — perhaps more than your lordship would expect. The language and images are the best part, after the two principal scenes, which are really fine.* I did, as your lordship knows and says, always like and esteem Lady Fitzwilliam. I scarce know my lord ; but from what I have heard of him in the House of Lords, have con ceived a good opinion of his sense : of his character I never heard any ill; which is a great testimonial in his favour, ary reform ; but in the various changes which soon afterwards perplexed the political world, its first object was almost forgotten, and its most im portant character was the front of opposition which it now maintained against that powerful aristocracy which had long ruled the county with absolute dominion. It now declared against the Coalition administra tion." Life of Wilberforce, vol. i. p. SI. — E. ' Of Lord CarUsle's tragedy, entitled " The Father's Revenge," Dr. Johnson also entertained a favourable opinion. " Of the sentiments," he says, " I remember not one that I wished omitted. In the imagery, I cannot forbear to distinguish the comparison of joy succeeding grief to Ught rushing on the eye accustomed to darkness. It seems to have all that can be desired to make it please : it is new, just, and delightful. With the characters, either as conceived or preserved, I have no fault to find ; but was much inclined to congratulate a writer, who, in defiance of prejudice and fashion, made the Archbishop a good man, and scorned all thoughtless applause which a vicious churchman would have brought him." It was with reference to this tragedy, that Lord Byron regretted the flippant and unjust sarcasms against his noble relation, which he had admitted into the early editions of his " EngUsh Bards and ScMch Re viewers," under the mistaken impression that Lord CarUsle had inten- tionaUy slighted him. — E. 1783. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 203 when there are so many horrid characters, and when all that are conspicuous have their minutest actions tortured to de pose against them. You may be sure, my dear lord, that I heartily pity Lady Strafford's and your loss of four-legged friends. Sense and fidelity are wonderful recommendations ; and when one meets with them, and can be confident that one is not imposed upon, I cannot think that the two additional legs are any drawback. At least I know that I have had friends who would never have vexed or betrayed me, if they had walked on all-fours. I have no news to send your lordship ; indeed I inquire for none, nor wish to hear any. Whence is any good to come ? I am every day surprised at hearing people eager for news. If there is any, they are sure of hearing it. How can one be curious to know one does not know what ; and per petually curious to know? Has one nothing to do but to hear and relate something new? — And why can one care about nothing but what one does not know? And why is every event worth hearing, only because one has not heard it ? Have not there been changes enough ? divorces enough ? bankruptcies and robberies enough? and, above all, lies enough ? — No ; or people would not be every day impatient for the newspaper. I own, I am glad on Sunday when there is no paper,* and no fresh hes circulating. Adieu, my good lord and lady ! May you long enjoy your tranquilhty, undis turbed by villainy, folly, and madness ! TO LADY BR0WNE.2 Berkeley Square, Oct. 19, 1783. As it is not fit my better-half should be ignorant of the state of her worse-half, lest the gossips of the neighbourhood should suspect we are parted ; let them know, my life, that I • What would Walpole say, if he could witness the alteration which has taken place in this respect since the year 1783? — E. " Now first printed. 204 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1783. am much better to-day. I have had a good deal of fever, and a bad night on Wednesday ; but the last was much better, and the fever is much diminished to-day. In short, I have so great an opinion of town-dried air, that I expect to be well enough to return to Twickenham on Monday ; and, if I do, will call on you that evening ; though I have not been out of my house yet. Indeed, it is unfortunate that so happy a couple, who have never exchanged a cross word, and who might claim the flitch of bacon, cannot be well — the one in town, the other in the country. TO GOVERNOR POWNALL. Strawberry HiU, Oct. 27, 1783. I AM extremely obliged to you. Sir, for the valuable com munication made to me.* It is extremely so to me, as it does justice to a memory I revere to the highest degree; and I flatter myself that it would be acceptable to that part of the world that loves truth; and that part will be the majority, as fast as they pass away who have an interest in preferring false hood. Happily, truth is longer-lived than the passions of in dividuals; and, when mankind are not misled, they can dis tinguish white from black. I myself do not pretend to be unprejudiced; I must be so to the best of fathers: I should be ashamed to be quite impartial. No wonder, then. Sir, if I am greatly pleased with so able a justification; yet I am not so bhnded, but that I can discern sohd reasons for admiring your defence. You have placed that defence on sound and new grounds; and, though very briefly, have very learnedly stated and distinguished the landmarks of our constitution, and the encroachments made on it by justly referring the principles of liberty to the Saxon system, and by imputing the corruptions of it to the Norman. This was a great deal too deep for that superficial mountebank, Hume, to go; for a mountebank he was. He mounted a system in the garb of a * The Governor's " Character of Sir Robert Walpole." It wiU be found among the original papers in Coxe's Life of Sir Robert. — E. 1783. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 205 phUosophic empiric, but dispensed no drugs but what he was authorised to vend by a royal patent, and which were full of Turkish opium. He had studied nothing relative to the English constitution before Queen Elizabeth, and had se lected her most arbitrary acts to countenance those of the Stuarts: and even hers he misrepresented; for her worst deeds were levelled against the nobihty, those of the Stuarts against the people. Hers, consequently, were rather an obh- gation to the people ; for the most heinous part of despotism is, that it produces a thousand despots instead of one. Muley Moloch cannot lop off many heads with his own hands; at least, he takes those in his way, those of his courtiers : but his bashaws and viceroys spread destruction everywhere. The flimsy, ignorant, blundering manner in which Hume executed the reigns preceding Henry the Seventh, is a proof how little he had examined the history of our constitution. I could say much, much more. Sir, in commendation of your work, were I not apprehensive of being biassed by the subject. Still, that it would not be from flattery, I will prove, by taking the liberty of making two objections ; and they are only to the last page but one. Perhaps you will think that my first objection does show that I am too much biassed. I own I am sorry to see my father compared to Sylla, The latter was a sanguinary usurper, a monster ; the former, the mildest, most forgiving, best-natured of men, and a fe^a/. mi nister. Nor, I fear, will the only light in which you compare them, stand the test Sylla resigned his power voluntarily, insolently ; perhaps timidly, as he might think he had a better chance of dying in his bed, if he retreated, than by continuing to rule by force. My father did not retire by his own option. He had lost the majority of the House of Commons. Sylla, you say, Sir, retired unimpeached ; it is true, but covered with blood. My father was not impeached, in our strict sense of the word ; but to my great joy, he was in effect. A secret committee, a worse inquisition than a jury, was named ; not to try him, but to sift his life for crimes : and out of such a jury, chosen in the dark, and not one of whom he might challenge, he had some determined enemies, many opponents, and but 206 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1783. two he could suppose his friends. And what was the conse quence ? A man charged with every state crime almost, for twenty years, was proved to have done — what? Paid some writers much more than they deserved, for having defended him against ten thousand and ten thousand libels, (some of which had been written by his inquisitors,) all which hbels were confessed to have been lies by his inquisitors themselves ; for they could not produce a shadow of one of the crimes with which they had charged him ! I must own. Sir, I think that Sylla and my father ought to be set in opposition rather than paralleled. My other objection is still more serious; and if I am so happy as to convince you, I shall hope that you will alter the paragraph ; as it seems to impute something to Sir Ro bert of which he was not only most innocent, but of which, if he had been guilty, I should think him extremely so, for he would have been very ungrateful. You say he had not the comfort to see that he had established his own family by any thing which he received from the gratitude of that Hanover family, or from the gratitude of that country, which he had saved and served ! Good Sir, what does this sentence seem to imply, but that either Sir Robert himself, or his family, thought or think, that the Kings George I. and II, or Eng land, were ungrateful in not rewarding his services ? Defend him and us from such a charge ! He nor we ever had such a thought. Was it not rewarding him to make him prime minis ter, and maintain and support him against his enemies for twenty years together ? Did not George I. make his eldest son a peer, and give to the father and son a valuable patent place in the custom-house for three lives ? Did not George II. give my elder brother the auditor's place, and to my brother and me other rich places for our lives ; for, though in the gift of the first lord of the treasury, do we not owe them to the King who made him so ? Did not the late King make my father an earl, and dismiss him with a pension of 4000Z. a- year for his life ? Could he or we not think these ample re wards? What rapacious sordid wretches must he and we have been, and be, could we entertain such an idea ? As far 1783. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 207 have we all been from thinking him neglected by his country. Did not his country see and know these rewards ? and could it think these rewards inadequate ? Besides, Sir, great as I hold my father's services, they were solid and silent, not ostensible. They were of a kind to which I hold your justifi cation a more suitable reward than pecuniary recompenses. To have fixed the house of Hanover on the throne, to have maintained this country in peace and affluence for twenty years, with the other services you record, Sir, were actions, the eclat of which must be illustrated by time and refiection ; and whose splendour has been brought forwarder than I wish it had, by comparison with a period very dissimilar ! If Sir Robert had not the comfort of leaving his family in affluence, it was not imputable to his King or his country. Perhaps I am proud that he did not He died forty thousand pounds in debt. That was the wealth of a man that had been taxed as the plunderer of his country ! Yet, with all my adoration of ray father, I am just enough to own that it was his own fault if he died so poor. He had made Houghton much too mag nificent for the moderate estate which he left to support it; and, as he never — I repeat it with truth, never — got any money but in the South Sea and while he was paymaster, his fond ness for his paternal seat and his boundless generosity, were too expensive for his fortune. I will mention one instance, which will show how little he was disposed to turn the favour of the crown to his own profit. He laid out fourteen thousand pounds of his own money on Richraond New Park. I could produce other reasons too why Sir Robert's family were not in so comfortable a situation, as the world, deluded by mis representation, might expect to see them at his death. My eldest brother had been a very bad economist during his father's life, and died hiraself fifty thousand pounds in debt, or raore ; so that to this day neither Sir Edward nor I have re ceived the five thousand pounds a-piece which Sir Robert left us as our fortunes. I do not love to charge the dead ; therefore will only say, that Lady Orford (reckoned a vast fortune, which tUl she died she never proved,) wasted vast suras; nor did my brother or father ever receive but the 208 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1783. twenty thousand pounds which she brought at first, and which were spent on the wedding and christening ; I mean, including her jewels. I beg pardon. Sir, for this tedious detail, which is minutely, perhaps too minutely, true ; but, when I took the liberty of contesting any part of a work which I admire so much, I owed it to you and to myself to assign my reasons. I trust they will satisfy you ; and, if they do, I am sure you will alter a paragraph against which it is the duty of the family to ex claim. Dear as my father's memory is to my soul, I can never subscribe to the position that he was unrewarded by the house of Hanover. TO GOVERNOR POWNALL. Berkeley Square, Nov. 7, 1783. You must allow me. Sir, to repeat my thanks for the second copy of your tract on my father, and for your great condescension in altering the two passages to which I pre sumed to object; and which are not only more consonant to exactness, but I hope, no disparagement to the piece. To me they are quite satisfactory. And it is a comfort to me too, that what I begged to have changed was not any refiection prejudicial to his memory; but in the first point a paraUel not entirely simUar in circurastances ; and, in the other, a sort of censure on others to which I could not subscribe. With aU my veneration for my father's memory, I should not remon strate against just censure on him. Happily, to do justice to him, most iniquitous calumnies ought to be removed; and then there would remain virtues and merits enough, far to outweigh human errors, from which the best of men, like him, cannot be exempt. Let his enemies, ay and his friends, be compared with hira, and then justice would be done ! Your essay. Sir, will, I hope, sorae time or other, clear the way to his vindication. It points out the true way of examining his character ; and is itself, as far as it goes, unanswerable. As such, what an obhgation it must be to. Sir, &c. 1783. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 209 TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Berkeley Square, Nov. 10, 1783. If I consulted my reputation as a writer, which your lordship's partiahty is so kind as to allot me, I should wait a few days till my granary is fuller of stock, which probably it would be by the end of next week ; but, in truth, I had rather be a grateful, and consequently a punctual correspondent than an ingenious one; as I value the honour of your lordship's friendship more than such tinsel bits of farae as can fall to ray share, and of which I am particularly sick at present as the Public Advertiser dressed me out t'other day with a heap of that dross, which he had pillaged from some other strolling playwrights, who I did not desire should be plundered for me. Indeed, when the Parliament does meet I doubt, nay hope, it will make less sensation than usual. The orators of Dublin have brought the flowers of Billingsgate to so high perfection, that ours comparatively will have no more scent than a dead dandelion. If your lordship has not seen the speeches of Mr. Flood and Mr. Grattan,* you may perhaps stUl think that our oyster-women can be more abusive than members of parlia ment Since I began my letter, I hear that the meeting of the delegates from the Volunteers is adjourned to the first of Fe bruary.* This seems a very favourable circumstance, I don't like a reformation begun by a Popish army ! Indeed, I did ' In the course of a debate in the Irish House of Commons, on the 28th of October, upon Sir Henry Cavendish's motion for a retrenchment of the public expenditure, violent altercation had taken place between the rival orators, WhUe Mr. Grattan animadverted, with disgraceful bitterness, on the " broken beak and disastrous countenance " of his opponent, and charged him with betraying every man who trusted in him, Mr. Flood broadly insinuated, that Mr. Grattan had betrayed his country for a sum of gold ; and, for prompt payment, had sold himself to the minister. — E. ' They assembled at Dublin on the loth of November, when a plan of reform was produced and considered by them ; and on the following day Mr. Flood moved, in the House of Commons, for leave to bring in a biU for the more equal representation of the people in Parliament. The motion was rejected by 157 votes to 77. — E. VOL, VI. P 210 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1783. hope that peace would bring us peace, at least not more than the discords incidental to a free government: but we seem not to have attained that era yet ! I hope it wUl arrive, though I may not see it, I shall not easily believe that any radical alteration of a constitution that preserved us so long, and carried us to so great a height will recover our affairs. There is a wide difference between correcting abuses and re moving landmarks. Nobody disliked more than I the strides that were attempted towards increasing the prerogative; but as the excellence of our constitution, above all others, con sists in the balance established between the three powers of King, Lords, and Commons, I wish to see that equilibrium preserved. No single man, nor any private junto, has a right to dictate laws to all three. In Ireland, truly, a still worse spirit I apprehend to be at bottom ; in short it is phrensy or folly to suppose that an army composed of three parts of Catholics can be intended for any good purposes. These are my sentiments, my dear lord, and, you know, very disinterested. For myself, I have nothing to wish but ease and tranquillity for the rest of my time. I have no enmi ties to avenge. I do hope the present administration will last, as I believe there are more honest men in it than in any set that could replace them, though I have not a grain of par tiality more than I had for their associates. Mr. Fox I think by far the ablest and soundest head in England, and am per suaded that the more he is tried the greater man he will appear. Perhaps it is impertinent to trouble your lordship with my creed, it is certainly of no consequence to anybody; but I have nothing else that could entertain you, and at so serious a crisis can one think of trifles ? In general I am not sorry that the nation is most disposed to trifle ; the less it takes part, the more leisure will the ministers have to attend to the most urgent points. When so many individuals assume to be legis lators, it is lucky that very few obey their institutes. I rejoice to hear of Lady Strafford's good health, and am her and your lordship's most faithful humble servant. 1783. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 211 TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Berkeley Square, Dec. 11, 1783. Your lordship is so partial to me and my idle letters, that I am afraid of writing them; not lest they should sink below the standard you have pleased to affix to them in your own mind, but from fear of being intoxicated into attempting to keep them up to it which would destroy their only merit, their being written naturally and without pretensions. Grati tude and good breeding compel me to make due answers ; but I entreat your lordship to be assured, that, however vain I am of your favour, my only aim is to preserve the honour of your friendship ; that it is all the praise I ask or wish ; and that with regard to letter-writing, I am firmly persuaded that it is a province in which women will always shine superiorly ; for our sex is too jealous of the reputation of good sense, to con descend to hazard a thousand trifles and negligences, which give grace, ease, and familiarity to correspondence.* I will say no raore on that subject, for I feel that I am on the brink of a dissertation ; and though that fault would prove the truth of my proposition, I will not punish your lordship only to con vince you that I am in the right. ' Some excellent advice on the subject of female letter- writing, wiU be found in a letter written, in 1809, by Lord CoUingwood to one of his daughters : — " No sportsman," says the gaUant Admiral, " ever hits a par tridge without aiming at it ; and skiU is acquired by repeated attempts. When you write a letter, give it your greatest care, that it may be as perfect in all its parts as you can make it. Let the subject be sense, ex pressed in the most plain, intelligible, and elegant manner that you are capable of. If in a famUiar epistle you should be playful and jocular, guard carefully that your wit be not sharp, so as to give pain to any per son ; and before you write a sentence, examine it, even the words of which it is composed, that there be nothing vulgar or inelegant in them. Remember, my dear, that your letter is the picture of your brains ; and those whose brains are a compound of foUy, nonsense, and impertinence, are to blame to exhibit them to the contempt of the world, or the pity of their friends. To write a letter with negligence, without proper stops, with crooked lines and great flourishing dashes, is inelegant; it argues either great ignorance of what is proper, or great indifference towards the person to whom it is addressed, and is consequently disrespectful." Memoirs, p. 430. — E. p 2 212 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1783. The winter is not duU or disagreeable : on the contrary, it is pleasing, as the town is occupied on general subjects, and not as is too common, on private scandal, private vices, and foUies. The India-bill, air-balloons, Vestris, and the automa ton, share all attention. Mrs. Siddons, as less a novelty, does not engross all conversation. If abuse stUl keeps above par, it confines itself to its prescriptive province, the ministerial hne. In that walk it has tumbled a little into the kennel. The low buffoonery of Lord Thurlow, in laying the caricatura of the Coalition on the table of your lordship's House, has leveUed it to Sadler's Wells ; and Mr. Flood, the piUar of invective, does not promise to re-erect it ; not I conclude, from want of having imported a stock of ingredients, but his presumptuous debut on the very night of his entry was so wretched, and delivered in so barbarous a brogue, that I question whether he will ever recover the blow Mr. Courtenay gave him.* A young man may correct and improve, and rise from a first fall ; but an elderly formed speaker has not an equal chance. Mr. Hamilton,^ Lord Abercorn's heir, but by no means so laconic, had more success. Though his first essay, it was not at all dashed by bashfulness; and though he might have blushed for discovering so much personal rancour to Mr. Fox, he rather seemed to be impatient to discharge it. Your lordship sees in the papers that the two Houses of Ireland have firmly resisted the innovations of the Volunteers. Indeed, it was time for the Protestant proprietors to make ' Mr. Flood took his seat for Winchester on the 8th of December, and on the same evening addressed the House in opposition to Mr. Fox's East India biU. " He spoke," says Wraxall, " with great abiUty and good sense, but the slow, measured, and sententious style of enunciation which characterized his eloquence, appeared to English ears cold and stiff : unfortunately, too, for Flood, one of his own countrymen, Cour tenay, instantly opened on him such a battery of ridicule and wit as seemed to overwhelm the new member. Pie made no attempt at reply, and under these circumstances began the division. It formed a trium phant exhibition of ministerial strength, the Coalition numbering 208 ; while only 102 persons, of whom I was one, followed Pitt into the lobby : yet, within twelve days afterwards he found himself first minister, and so remained for above seventeen years." — E. " John James Hamilton. In 1789, he succeeded his uncle as ninth Earl of Abercorn and second Viscount HamUton ; and, in 1790, was created Marquis of Abercorn. — E. 1784. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 213 their stand; for though the Catholics behave decently, it would be into their hands that the prize would fall. The delegates, it is true, have sent over a most loyal address ; but I wish their actions raay not contradict their words ! Mr. Flood's discomfiture here wiU, I suppose, carry him back to a field wherein his wicked spirit may have more effect. It is a very serious moment ! I am in pain lest your county, my dear lord, (you know what I mean,) should countenance such pernicious designs. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Berkeley Square, Wednesday, May 5, 1784.. Your cherries, for aught I know, may, like Mr. Pitt be half ripe before others are in blossom ; but at Twicken ham, I am sure, I could find dates and pomegranates on the quickset hedges, as soon as a cherry in swaddling-clothes on my walls. The very leaves on the horse-chesnuts are little snotty-nosed things, that cry and are afraid of the north- wind, and cling to the bough as if old poker was coming to take them away. For my part I have seen nothing hke spring but a chimney-sweeper's garland ; and yet I have been three days in the country — and the consequence was, that I was glad to come back to town. I do not wonder that you feel differently ; anything is warmth and verdure when compared to poring over memo rials. In truth, I think you will be much happier for being out of Parliament You could do no good there ; you have no views of ambition to satisfy: and when neither duty nor ambition calls, (I do not condescend to name avarice, which never is to be satisfied, nor deserves to be reasoned with, nor has any place in your breast,) I cannot conceive what satisfaction an elderly man can have in listening to the passions or follies of others : nor is eloquence such a banquet, when one knows that whoever the cooks are, whatever the sauces, one has eaten as good beef or mutton before, and, perhaps, as well dressed. It is surely time to live for one's self, when one has not a vast while to live ; and you, I am 214 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1784. persuaded, wiU live the longer for leading a country life. How much better to be planting, nay, making experiments on smoke (if not too dear), than reading apphcations from officers, a quarter of whom you could not serve, nor content three quarters ! You had not time for necessary exercise ; and, I beheve, would have blinded yourself. In short if you wiU live in the air aU day, be totally idle, and not read or write a line by candle-light, and retrench your suppers, I shall rejoice in your having nothing to do but that dreadful punishment, pleasing yourself. Nobody has any claims on you; you have satisfied every point of honour; you have no cause for being particularly grateful to the Opposition; and you want no excuse for living for yourself. Your re solutions on economy are not only prudent but just; and, to say the truth, I believe that if you had continued at the head of the array, you would have ruined yourself. You have too much generosity to have curbed yourself, and would have had too httle time to attend to doing so. I know by myself how pleasant it is to have laid up a little for those I love, for those that depend on me, and for old servants. Moderate wishes may be satisfied ; and, which is still better, are less liable to disappointment I am not preaching, nor giving advice, but congratulating you : and it is certainly not being selfish, when I rejoice at your being thrown by circumstances into a retired life, though it will occasion my seeing less of you: but I have always preferred what was most for your own honour and happiness; and as you taste satisfaction already, it will not diminish, for they are the first moments of passing from a busy life to a quiet one that are the most irksome. You have the felicity of being able to amuse yourself with what the grave world calls trifles ; but as gravity does not hap pen to be wisdom, trifles are full as important as what is respected as serious; and more amiable, as generally more innocent Most men are bad or ridiculous, sometimes both : at least my experience tells me what my reading had told me before, that they are so in a great capital of a sinking country. If immortal fame is his object, a Cato may die — 1784. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 215 but he will do no good. If only the preservation of his vir tue had been his point he might have hved comfortably at Athens, like Atticus — who, by the way, happens to be as immortal; though I will give him credit for having had no such view. Indeed, I look on this country as so irrecover ably on the verge of ruin, from its enormous debt from the loss of America, from the almost as certain prospect of losing India, that my pride would dislike to be an actor when the crash may happen. You seem to think that I might send you more news. So I might, if I would talk of elections ; * but those, you know, I hate, as, in general, I do all details. How Mr. Fox has recovered such a majority I do not guess; still less do I comprehend how there could be so many that had not voted, after the poll had lasted so long.^ Indeed, I should be sorry to understand such mysteries. — Of new peers, or new eleva tions, I hear every day, but am quite ignorant which are to be true. Rumour always creates as many as the King, when he makes several. In fact, I do know nothing. Adieu ! P. S. The suraraer is come to town, but I hope is gone into the country too. ' The Parliament had been dissolved in March, and a new one was summoned to meet on the 18th of May. — E. ' Mr. Pitt says, in a letter to Mr. Wilberforce, of the 8th of April, " Westminster goes on well, in spite of the Duchess of Devonshire and the other women of the people ; but when the poll will close is uncer tain." At the close of it, on the 17th of May, the numbers were, for Hood 6694, Fox 6233, Wray 5998. Walpole, whose delicate health at this time confined him almost entirely to his house, went in a sedan- chair to give his vote for Mr. Fox. " Apropos of elections," writes Hannah More to her sister, " I had Uke to have got into a fine scrape the other night. I was going to pass the evening at Mrs. Cole's, in Lincoln's-inn Fields. I went in a chair : they carried me through Covent-Garden : a number of people, as I went along, desired the men not to go through the Garden, as there were a hundred armed men, who, suspecting every chairman belonged to Brookes's, would fall upon us. In spite of my en treaties, the men would have persisted ; but a stranger, out of huma nity, made them set me down; and the shrieks of the wounded — for there was a terrible battle — intimidated the chairmen, who at last were prevailed upon to carry me another way. A vast number of people fol lowed me, crying out, ' It is Mrs. Fox : none but Mr. Fox's wife would dare to come into Covent-Garden in a chair ; she is going to canvass in the dark ! ' Though not a Uttle frightened, I laughed heartily at this ; but shall stir no more in a chair for some time." Memoirs, vol. i. p. 315. — E. 216 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1784. TO MISS HANNAH MORE.* May, a, 1784. Mr. Walpole thanks Miss More a thousand times, not only for so obhgingly complying with his request, but for letting him have the satisfaction of possessing and reading again and again her charming and very genteel poem, the " Bas Bleu." He ought not in raodesty, to commend so much a piece, in which he himself is flattered; but truth is more durable than blushing, and he must be just though he may be vain. The ingenuity with which she has introduced, so easily, very difficult rhymes, is admirable; and though there is a quantity of learning, it has all the air of negligence, instead of that of pedantry. As she commands him, he will not disobey; and, so far from giving a single copy, he gives her his word that it shall not go out of his hands. He begs his particular compliments to Mrs. Garrick, and is Miss More's most devoted and much obliged hurable servant. TO THE HON, H, S, CONWAY, strawberry HUl, May 21, 1784. I AM perfectly satisfied with your epitaph,^ and would not have a syllable altered. It tells exactly what it means to say, and, that truth being an encomium, wants no addition or amplification. Nor do I love late language for modern facts, nor will European tongues perish since printing has been discovered. I should approve French least of all; it ' Walpole's intimacy with Miss Hannah More commenced in the year 1781. The following passages occur in her letters of that and the fol lowing year : — " Mr. Walpole has done me the honour of inviting me to Strawberry HiU : as he is said to be a shy man, I must consider this as a great compliment." — " We dined the other day at Strawberry HiU, and passed as delightful a day as elegant literature, high breeding, and lively wit can afford. As I was the greatest stranger, Mr. Walpole devoted himself to my amusement with great politeness."— E. " An epitaph for the monument erected by the states of Jersey to the memory of Major Pearson, kiUed in the attack of that island by the French, in January 1781. 1784. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 217 would be a kind of insult to the vanquished: and, besidesj the example of a hero should be held out to his countrymen rather than to their eneraies. You must take care to have the word caused, in the last line but one, spelt rightly, and not cauid. I know nothing of the Parliament but what you saw in the papers. I came hither yesterday, and am transported, like you, with the beauty of the country; ay, and with its per fumed air too. The lilac-tide scents even the insides of the rooms. I desired Lady Ailesbury to carry you Lord Melcombe's Diary.* It is curious indeed ; not so much from the secrets it blabs, which are rather characteristic than novel, but from the wonderful folly of the author, who was so fond of talking of himself, that he tells all he knew of himself, though scarce an event that does not betray his profligacy; and (which is still more surprising that he should disclose) almost every one exposes the contempt in which he was held, and his conse quential disappointments and disgraces ! Was ever any man the better for another's experience ? What a lesson is here against versatility ! I, who have lived through all the scenes unfolded, ara entertained ; but I should think that to younger readers half the book must be unintelligible. He explains nothing but the circurastances of his own situation; and, though he touches on many important periods, he leaves them undeveloped, and often undetermined. It is diverting to hear him rail at Lord Halifax and others, for the very kind of double-dealing which he relates coolly of hiraself in the next page. Had he gone backwards, he might have given half a dozen volumes of his own life, with similar anecdotes and va riations. I am most surprised, that when self-love is the whole ground-work of the performance, there should be little or no attempt at shining as an author, though he was one. As he had so much wit too, I am amazed that not a feature of it appears. The discussion in the appendix, on the late * " The Diary of George Bubb Dodington, Baron of Melcombe Regis, from March 8, 1749, to February 6, 1761 ; published by Henry Penrud- docke Wyndham." See vol. ii. p. 119. — E. 218 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1784. Prince's question for increase of allowance, is the only part in which there is sense or honesty. There is, in the imper fect account of Rochfort, a strong circumstance or two that pleased me much. There are many passages that will dis please several others throughout. Mr. Coxe's Travels* are very different: plain, clear, sen sible, instructive, and entertaining. It is a noble work, and precious to me who delight in quartos: the two volumes contain twelve hundred pages; I have already devoured a quarter, though I have had them but three days. [The rest of this letter is lost] TO THE COUNTESS OF AILESBURY. strawberry Hill, Tuesday night, June 8, 1784. You frightened me for a minute, my dear Madam ; but every letter since has given me pleasure, by telling me how rapidly you recovered, and how perfectly well you are again. Pray, however, do not give me any more such joys. I shall be quite content with your remaining iramortal, without the foil of any alarm. You gave all your friends a panic, and may trust their attachment without renewing it. I received as many inquiries the next day as if an archbishop was in danger, and all the bench hoped he was going to heaven. Mr. Conway wonders I do not talk of Voltaire's Memoirs. Lord bless me ! I saw it two months ago ; the Lucans brought it from Paris and lent it to me : nay, and I have seen most of it before ; and I believe this an imperfect copy, for it ends no how at all. Besides, it was quite out of my head. Lord Melcombe's Diary put that and everything else out of my mind. I wonder much more at Mr. Conway's not talking of this ! It gossips about the living as famUiarly as a modern newspaper. I long to hear what * * * * gays about it. I wish the newspapers were as accurate ! They have been cir- ' " Travels into Poland, Russia, Sweden, and Denmark; interspersed with Historical Relations and Political Inquiries; by WUUam Cox, M. A.," in two volumes quarto. — E. 1784. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 219 curastantial about Lady Walsingharri s birth-day clothes, which to be sure one is glad to know, only unluckily there is no such person. However, I dare to say that her dress was very becoming, and that she looked charmingly. The raonth of June, according to custom immemorial, is as cold as Christmas. I had a fire last night and all my rose buds, I believe, would have been very glad to sit by it. I have other grievances to boot ; but as they are annuals too, — videlicet, people to see my house, — I will not torment your ladyship with them: yet I know nothing else. None of my neighbours are come into the country yet : one would think all the dowagers were elected into the new Parliament Adieu, my dear Madam ! TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry HiU, June 25, 1784. I CAN answer you very readily in your own tone, that is, about weather and country grievances, and without one word of news or politics ; for I know neither, nor inquire of them.* I am very well content to be at Strulbrug, and to exist after I have done being : and I am still better pleased that you are in the same way of thinking, or of not thinking; for I am sure both your health and your raind will find the benefits of living for yourself and family only. It were not fit that the young should concentre themselves in so narrow a circle ; nor do the young seem to have any such intention. Let them mend or mar the world as they please ; the world takes its own way upon the whole: and, though there may be an uncommon swarm of animalculse for a season, things return into their own channel from their own bias, before any effectual nostrum of fumigation is discovered. In the mean time, I am for giving ' " As politics spoil all conversation, Mr. Walpole, the other night, proposed that everybody should forfeit half-a-crown who said anything tending to introduce the idea either of ministers or opposition. I added, that whoever even mentioned pit-coal or a, fox-skin muff, should be con sidered as guilty ; and it was accordingly voted." Hannah More, March 8, 1784.- E. 220 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1784. all due weight to local grievances, though with no natural turn towards attending to them : but they serve for conversa tion. We have no newly-invented grubs to eat our fruit; indeed, I have no fruit to be eaten : but I should not lament if the worms would eat my gardener, who, you know, is so bad an one that I never have anything in my garden. I am now waiting for dry weather to cut my hay; though nature certainly never intended hay should be cut dry, as it always rains all June. But here is a worse calamity ; one is never safe by day or night : Mrs. Walsingham, who has bought your brother's late house at Ditton, was robbed a few days ago in the high road, within a mile of home, at seven in tbe evening. The dii minorum gentium pilfer everything. Last night they stole a couple of yards of lead off the pediment of the door of my cottage. A gentleman at Putney, who has three men- servants, had his house broken open last week, and lost some fine miniatures, which he valued so much that he would not hang them up. You raay imagine what a pain this gives me in my baubles ! I have been making the round of my fortifi cations this morning, and ordering new works. I am concerned for the account you give me of your brother. Life does not appear to be such a jewel as to preserve it care fully for its own sake. I think the same of its good things : if they do not procure arauseraent or comfort, I doubt they only produce the contrary. Yet it is silly to repine ; for, pro bably, whatever any man does by choice, he knows will please him best, or at least will prevent greater uneasiness. I, there fore, rather retract my concern ; for, with a vast fortune. Lord Hertford might certainly do what he would: and if, at his age, he can wish for more than that fortune will obtain, I may pity his taste or temper ; but I shall think that you and I are much happier who can find enjoyments in an humbler sphere, nor envy those who have no time for trifling. I, who have never done anything else, am not at all weary of my occupa tion. Even three days of continued rain have not put me out of humour or spirits. Cest beaucoup dire for an Anglais. Adieu ! Yours ever. 1784. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 221 TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry Hill, June 30, 1784. Instead of coming to you, I am thinking of packing up and going to town for winter, so desperate is the weather ! I found a great fire at Mrs. Clive's this evening, and Mr. Raftor hanging over it like a smoked ham. They tell me my hay will be all spoiled for want of cutting; but I had rather it should be destroyed by standing than by being mowed, as the forraer will cost me nothing but the crop, and 'tis very dear to make nothing but a water-souchy of it You know I have lost a niece, and found another nephew : he makes the fifty-fourth, reckoning both sexes. We are cer tainly an affectionate family, for of late we do nothing but marry one another. Have not you felt a little twinge in a remote corner of your heart on Lady Harrington's death?* She dreaded death so extremely that I am glad she had not a moment to be sensible of it I have a great affection for sudden deaths ; they save oneself and everybody else a deal of ceremony. The Duke and Duchess of Marlborough breakfasted here on Monday, and seemed much pleased, though it rained the whole time with an Egyptian darkness, I should have thought there had been deluges enough to destroy all Egypt's other plagues : but the newspapers talk of locusts ; I suppose rela tions of your beetles, though probably not so fond of green fruit ; for the scene of their campaign is Queen-square, West minster, where there certainly has not been an orchard since the reign of Canute. I have, at last, seen an air-balloon; just as I once did see a tiny review, by passing one accidentally on Hounslow-heath. I was going last night to Lady Onslow at Richmond, and over Mr. Cambridge's field I saw a bundle in the air not bigger than the raoon,^ and she herself could not have descended with * See vol. i. p. 356.— E. ' " Lunardi's nest," says Hannah More, " when I saw it yesterday, looking Uke a peg-top, seemed, 1 assure you, higher than the moon, ' riding towards her highest noon.' " — E. 222 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1784. more composure if she had expected to find Endymion fast asleep. It seemed to 'hght on Richmond-hill; but Mrs. Hobart was going by, and her coiffure prevented my seeing it alight The papers say, that a balloon has been made at Paris representing the castle of Stockholm, in compliment to the King of Sweden; but that they are afraid to let it off: so, I suppose, it will be served up to him in a dessert. No great progress, surely, is made in these airy navigations, if they are still afraid of risking the necks of two or three subjects for the entertainraent of a visiting sovereign. There is seldora a,fm dejoie for the birth of a Dauphin that does not cost more lives. I thought royalty and science never haggled about the value of blood when experiments are in the question. I shall wait for summer before I make you a visit. Though I dare to say that you have converted your smoke-kilns into a manufacture of balloons, pray do not erect a Strawberry castle in the air for my reception, if it will cost a pismire a hair of its head. Good night ! I have ordered my bed to be heated as hot as an oven, and Tonton and I must go into it. TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Strawberry Hill, August 6, 1784. I AM very sorry, my dear lord, that I must answer your lordship's letter by a condolence. I had not the honour of being acquainted with Mrs. Vyse, but have heard so much good of her, that it is impossible not to lament her. Since this month began we have had fine weather; and 'twere great pity if we had not, when the earth is covered with such abundant harvests ! They talk of an earthquake having been felt in London. Had Sir William HamUton been there, he would think the town gave itself great airs. He, I believe, is putting up volcanos in his own country. In my youth, phUosophers were eager to ascribe every uncommon discovery to the Deluge ; now it is the fashion to solve every appearance by conflagrations. If there was such an inunda tion upon the earth, and such a furnace under it I am amazed 1784. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 223 that Noah and company were not boiled to death. Indeed, I am a great sceptic about human reasonings ; they predominate only for a time, like other mortal fashions, and are so often exploded after the mode is passed, that I hold them little more serious, though they call themselves wisdom. How raany have I lived to see established and confuted ! For in stance, the necessity of a southern continent as a balance was supposed to be unanswerable; and so it was, till Captain Cook found there was no such thing. We are poor silly ani mals : we live for an instant upon a particle of a boundless universe, and are much like a butterfly that should argue about the nature of the seasons and what creates their vicis situdes, and does not exist itself to see one annual revolution of them ! Adieu ! my dear lord ! If my reveries are foolish, remem ber, I give them for no better. If I depreciate human wis dom, I am sure I do not assume a grain to myself; nor have anything to value myself upon raore than being your lord ship's most obliged humble servant. TO MR. DODSLEY.* Strawberry HiU, August 8, 1784. I MUST beg. Sir, that you wUl tell Mr. Pinkerton, that I am much obliged to him for the honour he is willing to do me, though I must desire his leave to decline it. His book'^ deserves an eminent patron : I am too inconsiderable to give any rehef to it, and even in its own line am unworthy to be distinguished. One of my first pursuits was a collection of medals ; but I early gave it over, as I could not afford many branches of virtO, and have since changed or given away several of my best Greek and Roman medals. What re main, I shall be glad to show Mr. Pinkerton ; and, if it would ' Now first coUected. ' The first edition of Pinkerton's " Essay on Medals " was published by Dodsley, in two volumes octavo, in this year, without the name of the author. — E. 224 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1784. not be inconvenient to him to come hither any morning by eleven o'clock, after next Thursday, that he wiU appoint he shall not only see my medals, but any other baubles here that can amuse him. I am. Sir, your most obedient hurable servant TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry HiU, August 14, 1784. As Lady Cecilia Johnston offers to be postman, I cannot resist writing a line, though I have not a word to say. In good sooth, I know nothing, hear of nothing but robberies and housebreaking ; consequently never think of ministers, India directors, and such honest men. Mrs. Clive has been broken open, and Mr. Raftor miscarried and died of the fright Lady Browne has lost all her hveries and her temper, and Lady Blandford has cried her eyes out on losing a lurch and almost her wig. In short as I do not love exaggeration, I do not believe there have been above threescore highway robberies within this week, fifty-seven houses that have been broken open, and two hundred and thirty that are to be stripped on the first opportunity. We are in great hopes, however, that the King of Spain, now he has demolished Algiers, the metro politan see of thieves, will come and bombard Richmond, Twickenham, Hampton-court, and all the sufiragan cities that swarm with pirates and banditti, as he has a better knack at destroying vagabonds than at recovering his own. Ireland is in a blessed way ; and, as if the climate infected everybody that sets foot there, the viceroy's aides-de-camp have blundered into a riot that will set all the humours afloat. I wish you joy of the summer being come now it is gone, which is better than not coming at all. I hope Lady CecUia will return with an account of your all being perfectly well. Adieu ! Yours ever. 1784. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 225 TO JOHN PINKERTON, ESQ.* Strawberry HiU, August 24, 1784. I AM much obhged to you, Sir, for the pieces you have sent me of your own composition.^ There is great poetic beauty and merit in them, with great knowledge of the ancient masters and of the best of the modern. You have talents that will succeed in whatever you pursue, and industry to neglect nothing that will improve them. Despise petty critics, and confute them by making your works as perfect as you can. I am sorry you sent rae the old manuscript ; because, as I told you, I have so little time left to enjoy anything, that I should think myself a miser if I coveted for a moment what I must leave so soon. I shall be very glad. Sir, to see you here again, whenever it is convenient to you. TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Strawberry HiU, Sept. 7, 1784. The summer is come at last, my lord, drest as fine as a birth-day, though not with so many flowers on its head. In truth, the sun is an old fool, who apes the modern people of * This is the first of the series of letters addressed by Mr. Walpole to Mr. Pinkerton. They are taken from his " Literary Correspondence," first printed in 1830, in two volumes octavo, by Dawson Turner, Esq. M.A. F.R.S. from the originals in his valuable collection. Mr. Pinkerton was born at Edinburgh in February 1758, and died at Paris in May 1826. " He was," says Mr. Dawson Turner, " a man of a capacious mind, great acuteness, strong memory, restless activity, and extraordi nary perseverance : the anecdotes contained in this correspondence afford a striking proof of the power of talents and industry to raise their pos sessor in the scale of society, as well as in the opinion of the world : un fortunately, they are also calculated to read us another and not less in structive lesson, that somewhat more is required to turn such advantages to their fuU account ; and that the endowments of the mind, unless ac companied by sound and consistent principles, can tend but little to the happiness of the individual, or to the good of society." — ^E. ' In 1781, Mr. Pinkerton had published an octavo volume entitled " Rimes;" a second edition of which, with additions, appeared in the following year. — E. VOL. VI. Q 226 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1784. fashion by arriving too late : the day is going to bed before he makes his appearance ; and one has scarce time to adraire his embroidery of green and gold. It was cruel to behold such expanse of corn everywhere, and yet see it all turned to a water-souchy. If I could admire Dante, — which, asking Mr. Hayley's pardon, I do not — 1 would have written an olio of Jews and Pagans, and sent Ceres to reproach Master Noah with breaking his promise of the world never being drowned again. But this last week has restored matters to their old channel ; and I trust we shall have bread to eat next winter, or I- think we must have lived on apples, of which to be sure there is enough to prevent a famine. This is all I know, my lord ; and I hope no news to your lordship. I have exhausted the themes of air-balloons and highwaymen ; and if you will have my letters, you must be content with my common-place chat on the seasons. I do nothing worth repeating, nor hear that others do : and though 1 am content to rust myself, I should be glad to tell your lordship anything that would amuse you. I dined two days ago at Mrs. Garrick's with Sir William Hamilton, who is returning to the kingdom of cinders. Mrs. Walsingham* was there with her son and daughter. He is a very pleasing young man ; a fine figure ; his face like hers, with something of his grandfather Sir Charles Williams, with out his vanity ; very sensible, and uncommonly well-bred. The daughter is an imitatress of Mrs, Damer, and has mo delled a bust of her brother, Mrs, Damer herself is modelling two masks for the key-stones of the new bridge at Henley. Sir William, who has seen them, says they are in her true antique style, I am in possession of her sleeping dogs in terra cotta. She asked me if I would consent to her executing them in marble for the Duke of Richmond ? I said, gladly ; I should like they should exist in a more durable material ; but I would not part with the original, which is sharper and more alive. Mr, Wyat the architect saw them here lately ; and said, he was sure that if the idea was given to the best statu ary in Europe, he would not produce so perfect a group, ' Charlotte, daughter of Sir Charles Hanbury WiUiams, Bart.- married to the Kon. Robert Boyle Walsingham. — E. 1784. THE HON, HORACE WALPOLE. 227 Indeed, with these dogs and the riches I possess by Lady Di,* poor Strawberry may vie with much prouder collections. Adieu, my good lord ! when I fold up a letter I am ashamed of it ; but it is your own fault. The last thing 1 should think of would be troubling your lordship with such insipid stuff, if you did not command it. Lady Strafford will bear me testi raony how often 1 have protested against it. TO JOHN PINKERTON, ESQ.^ Strawberry HUl, Sept. 27, 1784. I HAVE read your piece, Sir, very attentively; and, as I promised, will give you my opinion of it fairly. There is much wit in it especially in the part of Nebuchadnezer ; and the dialogue is very easy, and the denouement in favour of Barbara interesting. There are, however, I think, some ob jections to be made, which, having written so well, you may easily remove, as they are rather faults in the mechanism than in the writing. Several scenes seem to me to finish too abruptly, and not to be enough connected. Juliana is not enough distinguished, as of an age capable of more elevated sentiments: her desire of playing at hotcockles and bhnd- man's-buff sounds more childish than vulgar. There is an other defect, which is in the conduct of the plot : surely there is much too long an interval between the discovery of the marriage of Juliana and Philip, and the anger of her parents. The audience must expect immediate effect frora it ; and yet the noise it is to make arrives so late, that it would have been forgotten in the course of the intermediate scenes. I doubt a little, whether it would not be dangerous to open the piece with a song that must be totally incomprehensible to at least almost all the audience. It is safer to engage their prejudices by something captivating. I have the same objec tion to Juliana's mistaking deposit for posset, which may give * The number of original drawings by Lady Diana Beauclerc, at Strawberry HiU. ° Now first collected. Q 2 228 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1784. an ill turn : besides, those mistakes have been too often pro duced on the stage : so has the character of Mrs. Winter, a romantic old maid; nor does she contribute to tbe plot or catastrophe. I am afraid that even Mrs. Vernon's aversion to the country is far from novel ; and Mr. Colman, more ac customed to the stage than I am, would certainly think so. Nebuchadnezer's repartees of " Very well, thank you ! " and bringing in Philip, when bidden to go for a rascal, are printed in the Terrae Filius, and, I believe, in other jest-books ; and therefore had better be omitted. I flatter myself. Sir, you will excuse these remarks ; as they are intended kindly, both for your reputation and interest, and to prevent their being made by the manager, or audience, or your friends the reviewers. I am ready to propose your piece to Mr. Colman at any time ; but, as I have sincerely an opinion of your parts and talents, it is the part of a friend to wish you to be very correct, especially in a first piece ; for, such is the ill-nature of mankind, and their want of judgment too, that, if a new author does not succeed in a first attempt on the stage, a prejudice is contracted against him, and may be fatal to others of his productions, which might have pro spered, had that bias not been taken. An established writer for the stage may venture almost any idleness ; but a first essay is very different. Shall I send you your piece. Sir ; and how ? As Mr. Col- man's theatre will not open till next summer, you wiU have full tirae to make any alterations you please. I mean, if you should think any of my observations well founded, and which perhaps are very trifling. I have little opinion of my own sagacity as a critic, nor love to make objections ; nor should have taken so much hberty with you, if you had not pressed it. I am sure in me it is a mark of regard, and which I never pay to an indifferent author : ray admiration of your essay on medals was natural, uninvited, and certainly unaffected. My acquaintance with you since. Sir, has confirmed my opinion of your good sense, and interested me in behalf of your works ; and, having hved so long in the world myself, if my experience can be of any service to you, I cannot withhold it when you 1784. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 229 ask it ; at the same time leaving you perfectly at liberty to reject it if not adopted by your own judgment The experi ence of old age is very likely to be balanced by the weaknesses incident to that age. I have not however, its positiveness yet ; and willingly abandon my criticisra to the vigour of your judgraent. TO JOHN PINKERTON, ESQ.* Strawberry Hill, Oct. 6, 1784. You have accepted my remarks with great good-humour. Sir : I wish you may not have paid too much regard to them ; and I should be glad that you did not rest any alterations on my single judgment to which I have but little respect myself I have not thought often on theatric performances, and of late not at all. A chief ground of my observations on your piece proceeded from having taken notice that an English audience is apt to be struck with some familiar sound, though there is nothing ridiculous in the passage ; and fall into a foolish laugh, that often proves fatal to the author. Such was my objection to hot-cockles. You have, indeed, convinced me that I did not enough attend to your piece, as s. farce ; and, you must excuse me, my regard for you and your wit made me consider it rather as a short comedy. Very probably too, I have retained the pedantic impressions of the French, and demanded more observance of their rules than is necessary or just : yet I my self have often condemned their too delicate rigour. Nay, I have wished that farce and speaking harlequins were more en couraged, in order to leave open a wider field of invention to writers for the stage. Of late I have amply had my wish : Mr. O'Keefe has brought our audiences to bear with every ex travagance ; and, were there not such irresistible humour in his utmost daring, it would be impossible to deny that he has passed even beyond the limits of nonsense. But I confine this approbation to his Agreeable Surprise. In his other pieces ' Now first coUected. 230 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1784. there is much more untempered nonsense than humour. Even that favourite performance I wondered that Mr. Colman dared to produce. Your remark, that a piece fuU of marked characters would be void of nature, is most just This is so strongly my opi nion, that I thought it a great fault in Miss Burney's Cecilia, though it has a thousand other beauties, that she has la boured far too much to make all her personages talk always in character; whereas, in the present refined or depraved state of human nature, most people endeavour to conceal their real character, not to display it. A professional man, as a pedantic fellow of a college or a seaman, has a charac teristic dialect; but that is very different frora continually letting out his ruling passion. This brings me, Sir, to the alteration you offer in the per sonage of Mrs. Winter, whom you wittily propose to turn into a mermaid. I approve the idea much : I like too the restoration of Mrs. Vernon to a plain reasonable woman. She will be a contrast to the bad characters, and but a gra dation to produce Barbara, without making her too glaringly bright without any intermediate shade. In truth, as you cer tainly may write excellently if you please, I wish you to be stow your utmost abilities on whatever you give to the pub lic. I am wrong when I would have a farce as chaste and sober as a comedy ; but I would have a farce made as good as it can be. I do not know how that is to be accomplished; but I believe you do. You are so obliging as to offer to ac cept a song of mine, if I have one by me. Dear Sir, I have no more talent for writing a song than for writing an ode like Dryden's or Gray's. It is a talent per se; and given, like every other branch of genius, by nature alone. Poor Shenstone was labouring through his whole life to write a perfect song, and, in my opinion at least, never once suc ceeded; not better than Pope did in a St. CecUian ode. I doubt whether we have not gone a long, long way beyond the possibUity of writing a good song. AU the words in the language have been so often employed on simple images (without which a song cannot be good), and such reams of 1784. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 231 bad verses have been produced in that kind, that I question whether true simplicity itself could please now. At least we are not likely to have any such thing. Our present choir of poetic virgins write in the other extreme. They colour their compositions so highly with choice and dainty phrases, that their own dresses are not more fantastic and romantic. Their nightingales make as many divisions as Italian singers. But this is wandering from the subject; and, while I only meant to tell you what I could not do myself, I' am telling you what others do ill. I will yet hazard one other opinion, though relative to composition in general. There are two periods favourable to poets : a rude age, when a genius raay hazard anything, and when nothing has been forestalled: the other is, when, after ages of barbarism and incorrection, a master or two produces models formed by purity and taste: Virgil, Horace, Boileau, Corneille, Racine, Pope, exploded the li centiousness that reigned before them. What happened? Nobody dared to write in contradiction to the severity esta bhshed; and very few had abilities to rival their masters. Insipidity ensues, novelty is dangerous, and bombast usurps the throne which had been debased by a race oi faineants. This rhapsody will probably convince you. Sir, how much you was mistaken in setting any value on my judgment February will certainly be time enough for your piece to be finished. I again beg you. Sir, to pay no deference to my criticisms, against your own cool reflections. It is pru dent to- consult others before one ventures on publication ; but every single person is as liable to be erroneous as an author. An elderly man, as he gains experience, acquires prejudices too : nay, old age has generally two faults ; it is too quick-sighted into the faults of the time being, and too blind to the faults that reigned in his own youth, which, having partaken of or having admired, though injudiciously, he recollects with complacence. I confess, too, that there must be two distinct views in vsTiters for the stage, one of which is more allowable to them than to other authors. The one is durable fame ; the other, peculiar to dramatic authors, the view of writing to CORRESPONDENCE OF 1784. the present taste (and, perhaps, as you say, to the level of the audience). I do not mean for the sake of profit; but even high comedy must risk a little of its immortality by consulting the ruling taste; and thence comedy always loses some of its beauties, the transient, and some of its intelli gibility. Like its harsher sister, satire, many of its allusions must vanish, as the objects it aims at correcting cease to be in vogue; and, perhaps, that cessation, the natural death of fashion, is often ascribed by an author to his own reproofs. Ladies would have left off patching on the Whig or Tory side of their face, though Mr. Addison had not written his excellent Spectator.* Probably even they who might be cor rected by his reprimand, adopted some new distinction as ridiculous; not discovering that his satire was levelled at their partial animosity, and not at the mode of placing their patches ; for, unfortunately, as the world cannot be cured of being foolish, a preacher who eradicates one folly, does but make room for some other. TO THE HON, H. S, CONWAY, Strawberry HiU, Oct, 15, 1784. As I have heard nothing from you, I fiatter myself Lady Ailesbury mends, or I think you would have brought her again to the physicians : you will, I conclude, next week, as towards the end of it the ten days they named will be expired, I must be in town myself about Thursday, on some little busi ness of my own. As I was writing this, my servants called me away to see a balloon ; I suppose Blanchard's, that was to be let off from Chelsea this morning, I saw it from the coramon field before the window of my round tower. It appeared about a third of the size of the moon, or less, when setting, something above the tops of the trees on the level horizon. It was then ' The singularly clever and witty paper here alluded to was written by Addison himself: it is No. 81, " Female Party-spu-it Discovered by Patches," and was pubUshed June 2, 1711. — D. T. 1784. • THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 233 descending; and, after rising and declining a httle, it sunk slowly behind the trees, I should think about or beyond Sun- bury, at five minutes after one. But you know I am a very inexact guesser at measures and distances, and may be mis taken in many miles; and you know how little I have at tended to those airgonauts: only t'other night I diverted myself with a sort of meditation on future airgonation, sup posing that it will not only be perfected, but will depose navigation. I did not finish it, because I am not skilled, like the gentleman that used to write political ship-news, in that style, which I wanted to perfect my essay : but in the prelude I observed how ignorant the ancients were in supposing Icarus melted the wax of his wings by too near access to the sun, whereas he would have been frozen to death before he made the first post on that road. Next, I discovered an alliance be tween Bishop Wilkins's art of flying and his plan of an univer sal language; the latter of which he no doubt calculated to prevent the want of an interpreter when he should arrive at the moon. But I chiefly amused myself with ideas of the change that would be made in the world by the substitution of balloons to ships. I supposed our seaports to become deserted villages; and Salisbury-plain, Newmarket-heath, (another canvass for alteration of ideas,) and all downs (but the Downs) arising into dock-yards for aerial vessels. Such a field would be ample in furnishing new speculations. But to come to my ship-news : — " The good balloon Da;dalus, Captain Wing-ate, will fly in a few days for China ; he will stop at the top of the Monument to take in passengers. " Arrived on Brand-sands, the Vulture, Captain Nabob ; the Tortoise snow, from Lapland ; the Pet-en-1'air, from Ver sailles ; the Dreadnought frora Mount Etna, Sir W. Hamilton, commander; the Tympany, Montgolfier; and the Mine-A-in- a-bandbox, from the Cape of Good Hope. Foundered in a hurricane, the Bird of Paradise, from Mount Ararat. The Bubble, Sheldon, took fire, and was burnt to her gallery ; and the Phoenix is to be cut down to a second-rate." 234 CORRESPONDENCE OF ' 1784. In those days Old Sarum wiU again be a town and have houses in it There will be fights in the air with wind-guns and bows and arrows ; and there will be prodigious increase of land for tiUage, especially in France, by breaking up all public roads as useless. But enough of my fooleries; for which I ara sorry you must pay double postage. TO JOHN PINKERTON, ESQ.* October 27, 1784. I WOULD not answer your letter. Sir, till I could tell you that I had put your play into Mr. Colman's hands, which I have done. He desired ray consent to his carrying it into the country to read it deliberately : you shall know as soon as I receive his determination. I am much obliged to you for the many civil and kind expressions in your letter, and for the friendly information you give me. Partiality, I fear, dictated the former ; but the last I can only ascribe to the goodness of your heart. I have published nothing of any size but the pieces you mention, and one or two small tracts now out of print and forgotten. The rest have been prefaces to my Strawberry editions, and to a few other publications ; and some fugitive pieces which I reprinted several years ago in a small volume, and which shall be at your service, with the Cata logue of Noble Authors. With regard to the bookseller who has taken the trouble to collect my writings, (amongst which I do not doubt but he will generously bestow on me many that I did not write, ac cording to the liberal practice of such compilers,) and who also intends to write my life, to which (as I never did any thing worthy of the notice of the public) he must likewise be la volunteer contributor, it would be vain for me to endeavour to prevent such a design. Whoever has been so unadvised as to throw himself on the public, must pay such a tax in a pamphlet or magazine when he dies ; but, happily, the insects ' Now first coUected. 1784. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 235 that prey on carrion are still more short-lived than the car cases were, from which they draw their nutriment. Those momentary abortions live but a day, and are thrust aside by like embryos. Literary characters, when not illustrious, are known only to a few literary men ; and, amidst the world of books, few readers can come to my share. Printing, that secures existence (in libraries) to indifferent authors of any bulk, is like those cases of Egyptian mummies which in cata combs preserve bodies of one knows not whom, and which are scribbled over with characters that nobody attempts to read, till nobody understands the language in which they were written. I believe therefore it will be most wise to swim for a mo ment on the passing current, secure that it will soon hurry me into the ocean where all things are forgotten. To appoint a biographer is to bespeak a panegyric ; and I doubt whether they who coUect their works for the public, and. like me, are conscious of no intrinsic worth, do but beg mankind to accept of talents (whatever they were) in lieu of virtues. To antici pate spurious publications by a comprehensive and authentic one, is almost as great an evil : it is giving a body to scattered atoms ; and such an act in one's old age is declaring a fond ness for the indiscretions of youth, or for the trifles of an age which, though more mature, is only the less excusable. It is most true. Sir, that, so far from being prejudiced in favour of my own writings, I am persuaded that, had I thought early as I think now, I should never have appeared as an author. Age, frequent illness and pain, have given me as many hours of reflection in the intervals of the two latter, as the two latter have disabled from reflection ; and, besides their showing me the inutility of all our little views, they have suggested an observation that I love to encourage in myself from the rationality of it, I have learnt and have practised the humi liating task of comparing myself with great authors ; and that comparison has annihilated all the flattery that self-love could suggest. I know how trifling my own writings are, and how far below the standard that constitutes excellence : as for the shades that distinguish the degrees of mediocrity, they are not 236 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1784, worth discrimination ; and he must be very modest or easily satisfied, who can be content to glimmer for an instant a little more than his brethren glow-worms. Mine, therefore, you find, Sir, is not humility, but pride. When young, I wished for fame ; not examining whether I was capable of attaining it, nor considering in what lights farae was desirable. There are two sorts of honest farae; that attendant on the truly great, and that better sort that is due to the good, I fear I did not aim at the latter; nor discovered, till too late, that I could not compass the former. Having neglected the best road, and having, instead of the other, strolled into a narrow path that led to no good worth seeking, I see the idleness of my jour ney, and hold it more graceful to abandon my wanderings to chance or oblivion, than to mark solicitude for trifles, which I think so myself, I beg your pardon for talking so much of myself; but an answer was due to the unmerited attention which you have paid to ray writings. I turn with more pleasure to speak on yours. Forgive me if I shall blame you, whether you either abandon your intention, or are too impatient to execute it.* Your preface proves that you are capable of treating the sub ject ably; but allow me to repeat, that it is a work that ought not to be performed impetuously. A mere recapitula tion of authenticated facts would be dry; a more enlarged plan would demand much acquaintance with the characters of the actors, and with the probable sources of measures. The present time is accustomed to details and anecdotes ; and the age immediately preceding one's own is less known to any man than the history of any other period. You are young enough. Sir, to collect information on many particulars that wiU occur in your progress, from hving actors, at least from their contemporaries ; and, great as your ardour may be, you will find yourself delayed by the want of materials, and by farther necessary inquiries. As you have variety of talents, why should not you exercise them on works that will admit of more rapidity ; and at the same time, in leisure moments, ' Of writing a history of the reign of George the Second. 1784. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 237 coraraence, digest and enrich your plan by collecting new matter for it ? In one word, I have too much zeal for your credit, not to dissuade you from precipitation in a work of the kind you meditate. That I speak sincerely you are sure ; as accident, ' not design, made you acquainted with my admiration of your tract on medals. If I wish to delay your history, it must be from wishing that it raay appear with more advantages ; and I must speak disinterestedly, as my age will not allow me to hope to see it if not finished soon. I should not forgive my self if I turned you from prosecution of your work ; but, as I am certain that my writings can have given you no opinion of my having sound and deep judgment pray follow your own, and allow no merit but that of sincerity and zeal to the senti ments of yours, &c. TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Strawberry HUl, Nov. 13, 1784. Thank you a thousand times, dear Madam, for your obliging letter and the new Bristol stones you have sent me, which would pass on a more skilful lapidary than I am for having been briUianted by a professed artist if you had not told me that they came shining out of a native mine, and had no foreign diamond-dust to polish thera. Indeed, can one doubt any longer that Bristol is as rich and warm a soil as India? I am convinced it has been so of late years, though I question its having been so luxuriant in Alderman Can ning's days; and I have MORE reasons for thinking so, than from the marvels of Chatterton. — But I will drop me taphors, lest some nabob should take me au pie de la lettre, fit out an expedition, plunder your city, and massacre you for weighing too many carats. Seriously, Madam, I am surprised — and chiefly at the kind of genius of this unhappy female.* Her ear, as you reraark, ' Mrs. Yearsley, the milkwoman of Bristol, whose talent was discovered 238 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1784. is perfect; but that, being a gift of nature, amazes me less. Her expressions are more exalted than poetic ; and discover taste, as you say, rather than discover flights of fancy and wild ideas, as one should expect 1 should therefore advise her quitting blank verse, which wants the highest colouring to distinguish it from prose ; whereas her taste, and probably good sense, might give sufficient beauty to her rhymes. Her not being learned is another reason against her writing in blank verse. MiUon employed aU his reading, nay, aU his geographic knowledge, to enrich his language, and succeeded. They who have imitated him in that particular, have been mere monkeys ; and they who neglected it flat and poor. Were I not persuaded by the samples you have sent me. Madam, that this woman has talents, I should not advise her encouraging her propensity, lest it should divert her from the care of her family, and, after the novelty is over, leave her worse than she was. When the late Queen patronised Stephen Duck,* who was only a wonder at first and had not genius enough to support the character he had promised, twenty artisans and labourers turned poets, and starved, '^ Your poetess can scarce be more miserable than she is, and even the reputation of being an authoress may procure her by Miss Hannah More, who solicited for her the protection of Mrs. Montagu, in a prefatory letter prefixed to her Poems, pubUshed in quarto, in the year 1785. — E. ' Some of Stephen Duck the thresher's verses having been shown to Queen CaroUne, she settled twelve shillings a-week upon him, and ap pointed him keeper of her select library at Richmond. He afterwards took orders, and obtained the living of Byfleet, in Surrey ; but growing melancholy, in 1750 he threw himself into the river, near Reading, and was drowned. Swift wrote upon hira the foUowing epigram: — " The thresher. Duck, could o'er the Queen prevail ; The proverb says, ' No fence against a flail ! ' From threshing corn, he turns to thresh his brains. For which her Majesty allows him grains; Though 'tis confest, that those who ever saw His poems, think them all not worth a straw. Thrice happy Duck ! employ'd in threshing stubble, Thy toil is lessen'd, and thy profits double." — E. 2 "¦ Robert Bloomfield," says Mr. Crabbe, in his Journal for 1817, " had better have rested as a shoemaker, or even a farmer's boy ; for he would have been a farmer perhaps in time, and now he is an unfortunate poet." Poor John Clare, it will be recoUected, died in a workhouse. — E. 1784. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 239 customers : but as poetry is one of your least excellencies. Madam (your virtues will forgive me), I am sure you will not only give her counsels for her works, but for her con duct; and your gentleness will blend them so judiciously, that she will mind the friend as well as the mistress. She must remeraber that she is a Lactilla, not a Pastora; and is to tend real cows, not Arcadian sheep. What ! if I should go a step farther, dear Madam, and take the liberty of reproving you for putting into this poor woman's hands such a frantic thing as The Castle of Otranto ? It was fit for nothing but the age in which it was written : an age in which much was known ; that required only to be amused, nor cared whethfer its amusements were conformable to truth and the models of good sense; that could not be spoiled ; was in no danger of being too credulous ; and rather wanted to be brought back to imagination, than to be led astray by it : — but you will have made a hurly-burly in this poor woman's head, which it cannot develope and digest. I will not reprove, without suggesting something in my turn. Give her Dryden's Cock and Fox, the standard of good sense, poetry, nature, and ease. I would recommend others of his tales : but her imagination is already too gloomy, and should be enlivened; for which reason I do not name Mr. Gray's Eton Ode and Church-yard. Prior's Solomon (for I doubt his Alma, though far superior, is too learned for her limited reading,) would be very proper. In truth, I think the cast of the age (I mean in its compositions) is too sombre. The flimsy giantry of Ossian has introduced mountainous horrors. The exhibitions at Somerset-house are crowded with Brobdignag ghosts. Read and explain to her a charming poetic farailiarity called the Blue-stocking Club. If she has not your other pieces, might I take the liberty, Madam, of begging you to buy them for her, and let me be in your debt? And that your lessons may win their way more easily, even though her heart be good, wiU you add a guinea or two, as you see proper? And though I do not love to be naraed, yet if it would encourage a subscription, I should have no scruple. It will be best to begin mode- 240 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1784. rately; for, if she should take Hippocrene for Pactolus, we may hasten her ruin, not contribute to her fortune. On recollection, you had better caU me Mr. Anybody, than name my name, which I fear is in bad odour at Bristol, on poor Chattertons account ; and it may be thought that I am atoning his ghost : though, if his friends would show my letters to him, you would find that I was as tender to him as to your milkwoman : but that they have never done, among other instances of their injustice. However, I beg you to say nothing on that subject as I have declared I would not. I have seen our excellent friend in Clarges-street : she com plains as usual of her deafness ; but I assure you it is at least not worse, nor is her weakness. Indeed I think both her and Mr. Vesey better than last winter. When wiU you blue stocking yourself and come amongst us ? Consider how many of us are veterans ; and, though we do not trudge on foot ac cording to the institution, we may be out at heels — and the heel, you know. Madam, has never been privileged. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Sunday night, Nov. 28, 1784. I HAVE received the parcel of papers you sent me, which I conclude come from Lord Strafford, and will apply them as well as I possibly can, you may be sure, but with little hope of doing any good : humanity is no match for cruelty. There are now and then such angelic beings as Mr. Hanway and Mr. Howard ; but our race in general is pestilently bad and malevolent. I have been these two years wishing to pro mote my excellent friend Mr. Porter's plan for alleviating the woes of chimney-sweepers, but never could make impres sion on three people ; on the contrary, have generally caused a smile. George Conway's intelligence of hostilities commenced be tween the Dutch and Imperialists makes me suppose that France will support the former — or could they resist ? Yet I had heard that France would not. Some have thought 1784. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 241 as I have done, that a combination of partition would happen between Austria, France, and Prussia, the modem law of nations for avoiding wars. I know nothing: so my conjec tures may all be erroneous ; especially as one argues from reason; a very inadequate judge, as it leaves passions, ca prices, and accidents, out of its calculation. It does not seem the interest of France, that the Emperor's power should increase in their neighbourhood and extend to the sea. Con sequently it is France's interest to protect Holland in con cert with Prussia. This last is a transient power, and may determine on the death of the present King; but the Im perial is a perraanent force, and must be the enemy of France, however present connections raay incline the scale. In any case, I hope we shall no way be hooked into the quarrel; not only from the impotence of our circumstances, but as I think it would decide the loss of Ireland, which seems tranquilhzing : but should we have any bickering with France, she would renew the manoeuvres she practised so fatally in America. These are my politics ; I do not know with whose they coincide or disagree, nor does it signify a straw. Nothing will depend on my opinion ; nor have I any opinion about them, but when I have nothing at all to do 1;hat amuses me more, or nothing else to fill a letter. I can give you a sample of ray idleness, which may divert Lady Ailesbury and your academy of arts and sciences for a minute in the evening. It carae into ray head yesterday to send a card to Lady Lyttelton, to ask when she would be in town ; here it is in an heroic epistle : — From a castle as vast as the castles on signs, — From a hUl that all Africa's molehUls outshines. This epistle is sent to a cottage so smaU, That the door cannot ope if you stand in the haU, To a lady who would be fifteen, if her knight And old swain were as young as Methusalem quite : It comes to inquire, not whether her eyes Are as radiant as ever, but how many sighs He must vent to the rocks and the echos around, (Though nor echo nor rock in the parish is found,) Before she, obdurate, his passion wUl meet — His passion to see her in Portugal-street .'' VOL. VL R 24'2 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1785, As the sixth hne goes rather too near the core, do not give a copy of it : however, I should be sorry if it displeased ; though I do not beheve it will, but be taken with good-humour as it was meant* TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Berkeley Square, AprU S, 1785. Had I not heard part of your conversation with Mrs. Carter the other night. Madam, I should certainly not have discovered the authoress of the very ingenious anticipation of our future jargon.'^ How should I? I am not fortunate enough to know all your talents ; nay, I question whether you yourself suspect all you possess. Your Bas Bleu is in a style very different from any of your other productions that I have seen; and this letter, which shows your intuition into the degeneracy of our language, has a vein of humour and satire that could not be calculated from your Bas Bleu, in which good-nature and good-humour had made a great deal of learn- ' It was taken in perfect good-humour ; and Lady Lyttelton returned the following answer, which Mr. Walpole owned was better than his ad dress : — " Remember'd, though old, by a wit and a beau I I shall fancy, ere long, I 'm a Ninon I'Enclos : I must feel impatient such kindness to meet. And shall hasten my flight into Portugal-street." Ripley Cottage, 28th Nov. " This is an answer to the foUowing anonymous letter, sent to Mr. Walpole by Miss Hannah More, ridiculing the prevaiUng adoption of French idioms into the EngUsh language. There is not in this satirical epistle one French word nor one EngUsh idiom : — " A Specimen of the EngUsh Language, as it wiU probably be writ ten and spoken in the next century. In a letter from a lady to her Jriend, in the reign of George the Fifth. " Alamode Castle, June 20, 1840. " DEAK MADAM, " I NO sooner found myself here than I visited my new apart ment, which is composed of five pieces : the smaU room, which gives upon the garden, is practised through the great one ; and there is no other issue. As I was quite exceeded with fatigue, I had no sooner made my toilette, than I let myself faU on a bed of repose, where sleep came to surprise me. " My lord and I are on the intention to make good cheer, and a great expense; and this country is in possession to furnish wherewithal to amuse 1785. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 243 ing wear all the ease of familiarity. I did wish you to write another Percy, but I beg now that you will first produce a specimen of all the various manners in which you can shine ; for, since you are as modest as if your issue were illegitimate, I don't know but, like some females really in fault you would stifle some of your pretty infants, rather than be detected and blush. In the mean tirae, I beseech you not only to print your Specimen of the Language that is to be in fashion, but have it entered at Stationers'-hall ; or depend upon it, if ever a copy falls into the hands of a fine gentleman yet unborn, who shall be able both to read and write, he will adopt your letter for his own, and the Galimatias will give the ton to the court as Euphues did near two hundred years ago ; and then you will have corrupted our language instead of defending it: and surely it is not your interest. Madam, to have pure Enghsh grow obsolete. If you do not promise to grant my request, I will show your letter everywhere to those that are worthy of seeing it ; that is, indeed, in very few places ; for you shall have the honour of oneself. All that England has of illustrious, all that youth has of ami able, or beauty of ravishing, sees itself in this quarter. Render yourself here, then, my friend ; and you shall find assembled aU that there is of best, whether for letters, whether for birth. " Yesterday I did my possible to give to eat ; the dinner was of the last perfection, and the wines left nothing to desire. The repast was seasoned with a thousand rejoicing saUies, full of salt and agreement, and one more briUiant than another. Lady Frances charmed me as for the first time ; she is made to paint, has a great air, and has infinitely of expression in her physiognomy ; her manners have as much of natural as her figure has of interesting. " I had prayed Lady B. to be of this dinner, as I had heard nothing but good of her ; but I am now disabused on her subject : she is ]jast her first youth, has very little instruction, is inconsequent, and subject to caution ; but having evaded with one of her pretenders, her reputa tion has been committed by the bad faith of a friend, on whose fidelity she reposed herself; she is, therefore, fallen into devotion, goes no more to spectacles, and play is detested at her house. Though she affects a mortal serious, I observed that her eyes were of inteUigence with those of Sir James, near whom I had taken care to plant myself, though this is always a sacrifice which costs. Sir James is a great sayer of nothings ; it is a spoilt mind, full of fatuity and pretension : his conversation is a tissue of impertinences, and the bad tone which reigns at present has put the last hand to his defects. He makes but little care of his word ; but, as he lends himself to whatever is proposed of amusing, the women all throw themselves at his head. Adieu ! " R 2 244 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1785. it It is one of those compositions that prove themselves standards, by begetting imitations ; and if the genuine parent is unknown, it wUl be ascribed to everybody that is supposed (in his ovra set) to have more wit than the rest of the world. I should be diverted, I own, to hear it faintly disavowed by some who would wish to pass for its authors : but stiU there is more pleasure in doing justice to merit, than in drawing vain pretensions into a scrape ; and, therefore, I think you and I had better be honest and acknowledge it, though to you (for I am out of the question, but as evidence) it wiU be painful ; for though the proverb says, " TeU truth and shame the devil," I believe he is never half so much confounded as a certain amiable young gentlewoman, who is discovered to have more taste and abUities than she ever ventured to ascribe to herself even in the most private dialogues with her own heart, espe cially when that native friend is so pure as to have no occasion to make allowances even for self-love. For my part, I am most seriously obliged to you. Madam, for so agreeable and kind a communication. TO JOHN PINKERTON, ESQ.* June 22, 1785. Since I received your book,^ Sir, I scarce ceased from reading tiU I had finished it ; so admirable I found it and so full of good sense, brightly delivered. Nay, I am pleased with myself too for having formed the same opinions with you ' Now first collected. " His " Letters of Literature," published this year under the name of Heron. " It had been well for Mr. Pinkerton's reputation," observes Mr. Dawson Turner, " had these Letters never been pubUshed at aU. In a copy now before me, lately the property of one of our most eminent critics, Mr. Park, I read the foUowing very just quotation, in his hand writing : ' Multa venuste, multa tenuiter, multa cum bile.' Mr. Pink erton himself, in his ' Walpoliana,' admits that Heron's Letters was ' a book written in early youth, and contained many juvenile crude ideas long since abandoned by its author.' Would that ' the crudeness of many of the ideas ' were the worst that was to be said of it ! but we shaU find, in the course of this correspondence, far heavier and not less just complaints. The name of Heron, here assumed by Mr. Pinkerton, was that of his mother." — E. 1785. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 245 on several points, in which we do not agree with the generality of men. On some topics, 1 confess frankly, I do not concur with you : considering how many you have touched, it would be wonderful if we agreed on all, or I should not be sincere if I said I did. There are others on which I have formed no opinion ; for I should give myself an impertinent air, with no truth, if I pretended to have any knowledge of many subjects, of which, young as you are, you seera to have raade yourself master. Indeed, I have gone deeply into nothing, and there fore shall not discuss those heads on which we differ most ; as probably I should not defend my own opinions well. There is but one part of your work to which I will venture any ob jection, though you have considered it much, and I little, very little indeed, with regard to your proposal, which to me is but two days old : I mean your plan for the iraprovement of our language, which I allow has some defects, and which wants correction in several particulars. The specific amendment which you propose, and to which I object, is the addition of a's and o's to our terminations. To change s for a in the plural number of our substantives and adjectives would be so violent an alteration, that I believe neither the power of Power nor the power of Genius would be able to effect it. In raost cases I am convinced that very strong innovations are more likely to raake impression than small and alraost irapereeptible differ ences, as in religion, medicine, politics, &c. ; but I do not think that language can be treated in the same manner, espe cially in a refined age. When a nation first emerges from barbarism, two or three masterly writers may operate wonders ; and the fewer the number of writers, as the number is small at such a period, the more absolute is their authority. But when a country has been polishing itself for two or three cen turies, and when consequently authors are innumerable, the most supereminent genius (or whoever is esteemed so, though without foundation,) possesses very limited empire, and. is far from meeting implicit obedience. Every petty writer will con test very novel institutions : every inch of change in any lan guage will be disputed; and the language will remain as it was, longer than the tribunal which should dictate very bete- 246 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1785. rogeneous alterations. With regard to adding a or o to final consonants, consider, Sir, should the usage be adopted, what havoc it would make ! All our poetry would be defective in metre, or would become at once as obsolete as Chaucer; and could we promise ourselves, that, though we should acquire better harmony and more rhymes, we should have a new crop of poets, to replace Milton, Dryden, Gray, and, I am sorry you will not allow me to add. Pope ! You might enjoin our prose to be reformed, as you have done by the Spectator in your thirty-fourth Letter; but try Dryden's Ode by your new institution. I beg your pardon for these trivial observations : I assure you I could write a letter ten times as long, if I were to specify all I hke in your work. I more than like most of it ; and I am charmed with your glorious love of liberty, and your other humane and noble sentiraents. Your book I shall with great pleasure send to Mr. Colman : may I tell him, without naraing you, that it is written by the author of the coraedy I offered to him ? He must be struck with your very handsome and generous conduct in printing your encomiums on hira, after his reject ing your piece. It is as great as uncommon, and gives me as good an opinion of your heart Sir, as your book does of your great sense. Both assure me that you will not take ill the liberty I have used in expressing my doubts on your plan for amending our language, or for any I may use in dissenting from a few other sentiments in your work ; as I shall in what I think your too low opinion of some of the French writers, of your preferring Lady Mary Wortley to Madame de Sevigne, and of your esteeming Mr. Hume a man of a deeper and more solid understanding than Mr. Gray. In the two last articles it is impossible to think more differently than we do. In Lady Mary's Letters, which I never could read but once, I discovered no merit of any sort ; yet I have seen others by her (unpublished)* that have a good deal of wit; and for Mr. Hume, give me leave to say that I think your opinion, " that he might have ruled a state," ought to be qualified a little ; as ' See vol. iv. p. 272. — E. 1785. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 247 in the very next page you say, his History is " a mere apology for prerogative," and a very weak one. If he could have ruled a state, one must presume, at best, that he would have been an able tyrant; and yet I should suspect that a man, who, sitting coolly in his chamber, could forge but a weak apology for the prerogative, would not have exercised it very wisely. I knew personally and well both Mr. Hume and Mr. Gray, and thought there was no degree of comparison between their understandings ; and, in fact, Mr. Hume's writings were so superior to his conversation, that I frequently said he un derstood nothing till he had written upon it What you say. Sir, of the discord in his history frora his love of prerogative and hatred of churchraen, flatters me much ; as I have taken notice of that very unnatural discord in a piece I printed some years ago, but did not publish, and which I will show to you when I have the pleasure of seeing you here ; a satisfaction I shall be glad to taste, whenever you will let me know you are at leisure after the beginning of next week. I have the honour to be. Sir, &c. TO JOHN PINKERTON, ESQ.* June 26, 1785. I HAVE sent your book to Mr. Colman, Sir, and must de sire you in return to offer my grateful thanks to Mr. Knight, who has done rae an honour, to which I do not know how I am entitled, by the present of his poetry, which is very classic, and beautiful, and tender, and of chaste simplicity. To yowr book. Sir, I am rauch obliged on many accounts ; particularly for having recalled my raind to subjects of delight to which it was grown dulled by age and indolence. In con sequence of your reclairaing it, I asked rayself whence you feel so much disregard for certain authors whose fame is esta bhshed : you have assigned good reasons for withholding your approbation from some, on the plea of their being imitators : ' Now first coUected. 248 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1785. it was natural, then, to ask myself again, whence they had ob tained so much celebrity. I think I have discovered a cause, which I do not remeraber to have seen noted ; and that cause I suspect to have been, that certain of those authors possessed grace : — do not take rae for a disciple of Lord Chesterfield, nor imagine that I mean to erect grace into a capital in gredient of writing ; but I do believe that it is a perfume that will preserve from putrefaction, and is distinct even from style, which regards expression. Grace, I think, belongs to manner. It is from the charm of grace that I beheve some authors, not in your favour, obtained part of their renown ; Virgil in par ticular: and yet I am far from disagreeing with you on his subject in general. There is such a dearth of invention in the jEneid, (and when he did invent it was often so fool ishly,) so little good sense, so little variety, and so little power over the passions, that I have frequently said, from contempt for his matter, and from the charm of his harmony, that I be lieve I should hke his poem better, if I was to hear it re peated, and did not understand Latin. On the other hand, he has more than harmony: whatever he utters is said grace fully, and he ennobles his images, especially in the Georgics ; or at least it is more sensible there from the humility of the subject A Roman farmer might not understand his diction in agriculture; but he made a Roman courtier understand farming, the farming of that age, and could captivate a lord of Augustus's bedchamber, and tempt him to listen to themes of rusticity. On the contrary. Statins and Claudian, though talking of war, would make a soldier despise them as bullies. That graceful manner of thinking in Virgil seems to me to be more than style, if I do not refine too much ; and I admire, I confess, Mr. Addison's phrase, that Virgil " tossed about his dung with an air of majesty." A style may be excellent without grace : for instance. Dr. Swift's. Eloquence may be stow an imraortal style, and one of more dignity; yet elo quence may want that ease, that genteel air that flows from or constitutes grace. Addison hiraself was master of that grace, even in his pieces of humour, and which do not owe their merit to style; and from that corabined secret he excels all 1785. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 249 men that ever lived, but Shakspeare, in humour, by never dropping into an approach towards burlesque and buffoonery, when even his humour descended to characters that in any other hands would have been vulgarly low. Is not it clear that Will Wimble * was a gentleman, though he always lived at a distance from good company? Fielding had as much humour, perhaps, as Addison ; but, having no idea of grace, is perpetually disgusting. His innkeepers and parsons are the grossest of their profession ; and his gentlemen are awkward, when they should be at their ease. The Grecians had grace in everything ; in poetry, in ora tory, in statuary, in architecture, and, probably, in music and painting. The Romans, it is true, were their imitators ; but, having grace too, imparted it to their copies, which gave them a merit that almost raises them to the rank of originals. Horace's Odes acquired their farae, no doubt from the graces of his manner and purity of his style, — the chief praise of TibuUus and Propertius, who certainly cannot boast of raore meaning than Horace's Odes. Waller, whom you proscribe. Sir, owed his reputation to the graces of his manner, though he frequently stumbled, and even fell flat; but a few of his smaller pieces are as graceful as possible : one might say that he excelled in painting ladies in enamel, but could not succeed in portraits in oil, large as life. Milton had such superior merit, that I will only say, that if his angels, his Satan, and his Adam have as much dignity as the Apollo Belvidere, his Eve has all the dehcacy and graces of the Venus of Medicis; as his description of Eden has the colouring of Albano. Milton's tenderness im prints ideas as graceful as Guide's Madonnas: and the Al legro, Penseroso, and Comus might be denominated from the three Graces; as the Itahans gave similar titles to two or three of Petrarch's best sonnets. Cowley, I think, would have had grace, (for his mind was graceful,) if he had had any ear, or if his taste had not been vitiated by the pursuit of wit ; which, when it does not offer ' See Spectator, No. 109. WiU Wimble was a Yorkshire gentleman, whose name was 'Thomas Morecroft. — B. 250 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1786. itself naturally, degenerates into tinsel or pertness. Pertness is the mistaken affectation of grace, as pedantry produces erro neous dignity : the familiarity of the one, and the clumsiness of the other, distort or prevent grace. Nature, that furnishes samples of all qualities, and on the scale of gradation exhibits all possible shades, affords us types that are more apposite than words. The eagle is sublime, the lion majestic, the swan graceful, the monkey pert the bear ridiculously awk ward. I mention these, as more expressive and comprehensive than I could make definitions of my meaning; but I will apply the swan only, under whose wings I will shelter an apology for Racine, whose pieces give me an idea of that bird. The colouring of the swan is pure; his attitudes are graceful; he never displeases you when sailing on his proper element His feet raay be ugly, his notes hissing, not musical, his walk not natural ; he can soar, but it is with difficulty : — still, the impression the swan leaves is that of grace. So does Racine. Boileau may be compared to the dog, whose sagacity is re markable, as well as its fawning on its master, and its snarling at those it dislikes. If Boileau was too austere to admit the pliability of grace, he compensates by good sense and pro priety. He is hke (for I will drop animals) an upright magistrate, whom you respect, but whose justice and severity leave an awe that discourages familiarity. His copies of the ancients may be too servile ; but, if a good translator deserves praise, Boileau deserves more. He certainly does not fall below his originals ; and, considering at what period he wrote, has greater merit still. By his imitations he held out to his countrymen models of taste, and banished totally the bad taste of his predecessors. For his Lutrin, replete with excellent poetry, wit humour, and satire, he certainly was not obhged to the ancients. Excepting Horace, how little idea had either Greeks or Romans of wit and humour ! Aristophanes and Lucian, compared with moderns, were, the one a blackguard, and the other a buffoon. In my eyes, the Lutrin, the Dis pensary, and the Rape of the Lock, are standards of grace and elegance, not to be paralleled by antiquity ; and eternal reproaches to Voltaire, whose indelicacy in the Pucelle de- 1785. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 251 graded him as much, when compared with the three authors I have named, as his Henriade leaves Virgil, and even Lucan whom he more resembles, by far his superiors. The Dunciad is blemished by the offensive images of the games ; but the poetry appears to me admirable ; and, though the fourth book has obscurities, I prefer it to the three others : it has descriptions not surpassed by any poet that ever existed, and which surely a writer merely ingenious* will never equal. The lines on Italy, on Venice, on Convents, have all the grace for which I contend as distinct from poetry, though united with the most beautiful ; and the Rape of the Lock, besides the originality of great part of the invention, is a standard of graceful writing. In general, I believe that what I call grace, is denomi nated elegance; but by grace I mean something higher. I will explain myself by instances — Apollo is graceful. Mercury elegant Petrarch, perhaps, owed his whole merit to the harraony of his numbers and the graces of his style. They conceal his poverty of meaning and want of variety. His complaints, too, raay have added an interest, which, had his passion been successful, and had expressed itself with equal sameness, would have raade the number of his sonnets insup portable. Melancholy in poetry, I am inclined to think, con tributes to grace, when it is not disgraced by pitiful lamenta tions, such as Ovid's and Cicero's in their banishments. We respect melancholy, because it imparts a similar affection, pity. A gay writer, who should only express satisfaction without variety, would soon be nauseous. Madame de Sevigne shines both in grief and gaiety. There is too much of sorrow for her daughter's absence; yet it is always expressed by new terms, by new images, and often by wit, whose tenderness has a melancholy air. ' Pinkerton had said of Pope, that " he could only rank with ingenious men," and that " his works are superabundant with superfluous and un meaning verbiage ; his translations even replete with tautology, a fault which is to refinement as midnight is to noon-day ; and, what is truly surprising, that the fourth book of the Dunciad, his last pubUcation, is more fuU of redundancy and incorrectness than his Pastorals, which are his first."— D. T. 252 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1785. When she forgets her concern, and returns to her natural disposition — gaiety, every paragraph has novelty ; her allu sions, her applications are the happiest possible. She has the art of making you acquainted with all her acquaintance, and attaches you even to the spots she inhabited. Her language is correct, though unstudied ; and, when her mind is full of any great event, she interests you with the warrath of a dramatic writer, not with the chilling impartiality of an historian. Pray read her accounts of the death of Turenne, and of the arrival of King Jaraes in France, and tell me whether you do not know their persons as if you had hved at the time. For my part, if you will allow me a word of digression, (not that I have written with any method,) I hate the cold impartiality recommended to historians: " Si vis me flere, dolendum est primiim ipsi tibi :" but, that I may not wan der again, nor tire, nor contradict you any more, I will finish now, and shall be glad if you will dine at Strawberry HUl next Sunday and take a bed there, when I will tell you how many more parts of your book have pleased me, than have startled my opinions, or perhaps prejudices. I have the honour to be, Sir, with regard, &c. TO JOHN PINKERTON, ESQ.* Strawberry HiU, July 27, 1785. You thank rae much raore than the gift deserved. Sir : my editions of such pieces as I have left, are waste paper to me, I will not sell them at the ridiculously advanced prices that are given for them : indeed, only such as were published for sale, have I sold at all; and therefore the duphcates that remain with me are to me of no value, but when I can obhge a friend with them. Of a few of my impressions I have no copy but my own set; and, as' I could give you only an im perfect coUection, the present was really only a parcel of ' Now first coUected. 1785. THE HON, HORACE WALPOLE. 253 fragments. My meraory was in fault about the Royal and Noble Authors. I thought I had given them to you. I recollect now that I only lent you my own copy ; but I have others in town, and you shall have them when I go thither. For Vertue's manuscript I am in no manner of haste. I heard on Monday, in London, that the Letters were written by a Mr. Pilkington, probably from a confounded informa tion of Maty's Review : ray chief reason for calling on you twice this week, was to learn what you had heard, and I shall be rauch obliged to you for farther information; as I do not care to be too inquisitive, lest I should be suspected of know ing more of the matter. There are many reasons. Sir, why I cannot come into your idea of printing Greek. In the first place, I have two or three engagements for ray press ; and my time of life does not allow me to look but a httle way farther. In the next, I cannot now go into new expenses of purchase : my fortune is very much reduced, both by my brother's death, and by the late plan of reformation. The last reason would weigh with me, had I none of the others. My admiration of the Greeks was a little like that of the mob on other points, not from sound knowledge. I never was a good Greek scholar ; have long forgotten what I knew of the language ; and, as I never dis guise my ignorance of anything, it would look like affectation to print Greek authors. I could not bear to print them, with out owning that I do not understand them ; and such a con fession would perhaps be as much affectation as unfounded pretensions. I must therefore, stick to my simplicity, and not go out of my hne. It is difficult to divest one's self of vanity, because impossible to divest one's self of self-love. If one runs frora one glaring vanity, one is catched by its oppo site. Modesty can be as vain-glorious on the ground, as Pride on a triumphal car. Modesty, however, is preferable; for, should she contradict her professions, still she keeps her own secret and does not hurt the pride of others. I have the honour to be. Sir, with great regard, yours. 254 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1785. TO JOHN PINKERTON, ESQ.* Strawberry HiU, August 18, 1785. I AM sorry, dear Sir, that I must give you unanswerable reasons why I cannot print the work you recommend.'^ I have been so rauch sohcited since I set up ray press to employ it for others, that I was forced to make it a rule to hsten to no such applications. I refused Lord Hardwicke to print a publication of his ; Lady Mary Forbes, to print letters of her ancestor. Lord Essex; and the Countess of Aldborough, to print her father's poems, though in a piece as small as what you mention. These I recollect at once, besides others whose recom mendations do not iramediately occur to my memory ; though I dare to say they do remember them, and would resent my breaking my rule. I have other reasons which 1 will not detail now, as the post goes out so early : I will only beg you not to treat me with so much ceremony, nor ever use the word humbly to me, who am no ways intitled to such re spect. One private gentleman is not superior to another in es sentials: I fear the virtues of an untainted young heart are preferable to those of an old man long conversant with the world ; and in the soundness of understanding you have shown and will show a depth which has not fallen to the lot of Your sincere humble servant. ' Now first collected. ' It is impossible to say with certainty what is the work here alluded to ; but, most probably, it was Ailred's Life of St. Ninian, of which it appears, from a letter from the Rev. Rogers Ruding, dated August 4, 1785, that Mr. Pinkerton obtained at this time a transcript through him from the manuscript in the Bodleian Library. Pinkerton speaks of this manuscript, in the second volume of his Early Scottish History, p. 266, ¦ as " a meagre piece, containing very little as to Ninian's Pikish Mis sion." The letter alluded to from Mr. Ruding shows Pinkerton to have turned his mind to the antiquities of Scotland with great earnestness. — D. T. 1785. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 255 TO JOHN PINKERTON, ESQ.* Strawberry HUl, Sept. 17, 1785. You are too modest. Sir, in asking my advice on a point on which you could have no better guide than your own judg ment. If I presume to give you ray opinion, it is from zeal for your honour. I think it would be below you to make a regular answer to anonymous scribblers in a Magazine : you had better wait to see whether any formal reply is raade to your book, and whether by any avowed writer ; to whom, if he writes sensibly and decently, you may condescend to make an answer. Still, as you say you have been misquoted, I should not wish you to be quite silent, though I should like better to have you turn such enemies into ridicule. A foe who misquotes you, ought to be a welcome antagonist. He is so humble as to confess, when he censures what you have not said, that he cannot confute what you have said; and he is so kind as to furnish you with an opportunity of proving him a liar, as you may refer to your book to detect him. This is what I would do ; I would specify, in the same Ma gazine in which he has attacked you, your real words, and those he has imputed to you ; and then appeal to the equity of the reader. You may guess that the shaft comes from soracr body whom you have censured ; and thence you raay draw a fair conclusion, that you had been in the right to laugh at one who was reduced to put his own words into your mouth before he could find fault with them; and, having so done, what ever indignation he has excited in the reader must recoil on himself, as the offensive passages will come out to have been his own, not yours. You might even begin with loudly con demning the words or thoughts imputed to you, as if you re tracted them; and then, as if you turned to your book, and found that you had said no such thing there as what you was ready to retract, the ridicule would be doubled on your ad versary. ' Now first collected. 256 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1785. Something of this kind is the most I would stoop to ; but I would take the utmost care not to betray a grain of more anger than is implied in contempt and ridicule. Fools can only revenge themselves by provoking; for then they bring you to a level with themselves. The good sense of your work will support it ; and there is scarce a reason for defend ing it but by keeping up a controversy, to make it more noticed ; for the age is so idle and indifferent that few objects strike, unless parties are formed for or against them. I re meraber raany years ago advising sorae acquaintance of mine, who were engaged in the direction of the Opera, to raise a competition between two of their singers, and have papers written pro and con. ; for then numbers would go to clap and hiss the rivals respectively, who would not go to be pleased with the music. TO GEORGE COLMAN, ESQ.* Strawberry Hill, Sept. 19, 1785. SIR, I BEG your acceptance of a little work just printed here ; and I offer it as a token of ray gratitude, not as pretend ing to pay you for your last present A translation, how ever excellent, from a very inferior Horace,* would be a most inadequate return; but there is so much merit in the en closed version, the language is so pure, and the imitations of our poets so extraordinary, so much more faithful and harmo nious than I thought the French tongue could achieve, that I flatter myself you will excuse my troubling you with an old performance of my own, when newly dressed by a master- hand. As, too, there are not a great many copies printed, and those only for presents, I have particular pleasure in making you one of the earhest compliments. ¦ Now first printed. ' The Due de Nivernois' translation of Walpole's Essay on Garden ing. — E. 1785. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 257 TO THE EARL OP BUCHAN.* Strawberry HiU, Sept. 23, 1785. Your lordship is too condescending when you incline to keep up a correspondence with one who can expect to main tain it but a short time, and whose intervals of health are resigned to idleness, not dedicated, as they have sometimes been, to literary pursuits ; for what could I pursue with any prospect of accomplishment? or what avails it to store a memory that must lose faster than it acquires ? Your lord ship's zeal for illuminating your country and countrymen is laudable ; and you are young enough to make a progress : but a man who touches the verge of his sixty-eighth year, ought to know that he is unfit to contribute to the amusement of more active minds. This consideration, my lord, makes me much decline correspondence : having nothing new to commu nicate, I perceive that I fill my letters with apologies for having nothing to say. If you can tap the secret stores of the Vatican, your lord ship will probably much enrich the treasury of letters. Rome may have preserved many valuable documents, as for ages in telligence from all parts of Europe centred there ; but I con clude that they have hoarded little that might at any period lay open the share they had in most important transactions. History, indeed, is fortunate when even incidentally and col laterally it lights on authentic information. Perhaps, ray lord, there is another repository, and nearer, which it would be worth while to endeavour to penetrate : I raean, the Scottish College at Paris. I have heard formerly, that numbers of papers, of various sorts, were transported at the Reformation to Spain and Portugal: but if preserved there, they probably are not accessible yet. If they were, how puny, how diminutive, would all such discoveries, and others which we might call of far greater magnitude, be to those of Herschel, who puts up milhons of covies of worlds at ' Now first printed. VOL. VI. S 2.58 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1785. a beat! My conception is not ample enough to take in even a sketch of his ghmpses ; and, lest I should lose myself in attempting to follow his investigations, I recall my mind home, and apply it to reflect on what we thought we knew, when we imagined we knew something (which we deemed a vast deal) pretty correctly. Segrais, I think, it was, who said with much contempt to a lady who talked of her star, " Your star ! Madam, there are but two thousand stars in all; and do you imagine that you have a whole one to yourself?" The foolish dame, it seems, was not more ignorant than Segrais himself If our system includes twenty millions of worlds, the lady had as much right to pretend to a whole ticket as the phUosopher had to treat her like a servant-maid who buys a chance for a day in a state lottery. Stupendous as Mr. Herschel's investigations are, and admi rable as are his talents, his expression of our retired comer of the universe, seems a little improper. When a little emmet, standing on its ant-hill, could get a peep into infinity, how could he think he saw a corner in it ? — a retired corner ? Is there a bounded side to infinitude ? If there are twenty mil lions of worlds, why not as raany, and as many, and as many more ? Oh ! one's imagination cracks ! I long to bait within distance of home, and rest at the moon. Mr. Herschel will content me if he can discover thirteen provinces there, well inhabited by men and woraen, and protected by the law of nations ; * that law, which was enacted by Europe for its own emolument, to the prejudice of the other three parts of the globe, and which bestows the property of whole realms on the first person who happens to espy them, who can annex them to the crown of Great Britain, in lieu of those it has lost be yond the Atlantic. I am very ignorant in astronomy, as ignorant as Segrais or the lady, and could wish to ask many questions ; as. Whether our celestial globes must not be infinitely magnified? Our orreries, too, must not they be given to children, and new ones constructed, that will at least take in our retired corner ' The then thirteen united States of America. 1785. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 259 and all its outflying constellations? Must not that host of worlds be christened ? Mr. Herschel himself has stood god father for his Majesty to the new Sidus. His Majesty, thank God ! has a numerous issue ; but they and all the princes and princesses in Europe cannot supply appellations enough for twenty millions of new-born stars: no, though the royal progenies of Austria, Naples, and Spain, who have each two dozen saints for sponsors, should consent to split their bead- rolls of names among the foundlings. But I find I talk like an old nurse ; and your lordship at last wiU, I beheve, be convinced that it is not worth your while to keep up a cor respondence with a man in his dotage, merely because he has the honour of being, my lord, your lordship's most obedient servant. TO JOHN PINKERTON, ESQ.* StrawbeiTy HUl, Sept 30, 1785, I DO not possess, nor ever looked into, one of the books you specify ; nor Mabillon's " Acta Sanctorum," nor O'Fla- berty's " Ogygia." My reading has been very idle, and trifling, and desultory ; not that perhaps it has not been employed on authors as respectable as those you want to consult, nor that I had not rather read the deeds of sinners than Acta Sancto rum. I have no reverence but for sensible books, and conse quently not for a great number; and had rather have read fewer than I have, than more. The rest may be useful on certain points, as they happen now to be to you ; who, I am sure, would not read them for general use and pleasure, and are a very different kind of author. I shall like, I dare to say, anything you do write ; but I am not overjoyed at your wading into the history of dark ages, unless you use it as a canvass to be embroidered with your own opinions, and episodes, and comparisons with more recent times. That is a most enter taining kind of writing. In general, I have seldom wasted ' Now first collected. s 2 260 CORRESPONDENCE OP 1785. time on the origin of nations, unless for an opportunity of smihng at the gravity of the author, or at tbe absurdity of the manners of those ages; for absurdity and bravery com pose almost all the anecdotes we have of them, except the accounts of what they never did, nor thought of doing. I have a real affection for Bishop Hoadley : he stands with me in heu of what are called the Fathers; and I am much obliged to you for offering to lend me a book of his : but as my faith in him and his doctrines has long been settled, I shall not return to such grave studies, when I have so little time left and desire only to pass it tranquilly, and without thinking of what I can neither propagate nor correct. When youth made me sanguine, I hoped mankind might be set right. Now that I am very old, I sit down with this lazy maxim; that, unless one could cure men of being fools, it is to no pur pose to cure them of any folly, as it is only making room for some other. Self-interest is thought to govern every raan; yet, is it possible to be less governed by self-interest than men are in the aggregate ? Do not thousands sacrifice even their lives for single men ? Is not it an established rule in France, that every person in that kingdom should love every king they have in his turn ? What government is formed for gene ral happiness ? Where is not it thought heresy by the ma jority, to insinuate that the felicity of one man ought not to be preferred to that of miUions? Had not I better, at sixty- eight, leave men to these preposterous notions, than return to Bishop Hoadley, and sigh ? Not but I have a heartfelt satis faction when I hear that a mind as hberal as his, and who has dared to utter sacred truths, meets with approbation and purchasers of his work. You must not however, flatter your self. Sir, that all your purchasers are admirers. Some will buy your book, because they have heard of opinions in it that offend them, and because they want to find matter in it for abusing you. Let thera : the more it is discussed, the more strongly will your fame be estabhshed. I comraend you for scorning any artifice to puff your book ; but you must allow me to hope it will be attacked. I have another satisfaction in the sale of your book ; it will 1785. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 261 occasion a second edition. What if, as you do not approve of confuting misquoters, you simply printed a list of their false quotations, referring to the identical sentences, at the end of your second edition ? That will be preserving their infamy, which else would perish where it was bom; and perhaps would deter others from similar forgeries. If any rational op ponent staggers you on any opinion of yours, I would retract it ; and that would be a second triumph. I am, perhaps, too impertinent and forward with advice : it is at best a proof of zeal ; and you are under no obligation to follow my counsel. It is the weakness of old age to be apt to give advice ; but I will fairly arm you against myself, by confessing that when I was young, I was not apt to take any. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry HUl, Oct. 6, 1785. I WONDERED I did iiot hear from you, as I concluded you returned. You have made me good amends by the entertain ing story of your travels. If I were not too disjointed for long journeys, I should like to see much of what you have seen ; but if I had the agUity of Vestris, I would not purchase all that pleasure for ray eyes at the expense of my unsociabi- hty, which could not have borne the hospitality you expe rienced. It was always death to me, when I did travel Eng land, to have lords and ladies receive me and show me their castles, instead of turning me over to their housekeeper: it hindered my seeing anything, and I was the whole time medi tating my escape ; but Lady Ailesbury and you are not such sensitive plants, nor shrink and close up if a stranger holds out a hand. I don't wonder you was disappointed with Jarvis's windows at New College ; I had foretold their miscarriage. The old and the new are as mismatched as an orange and a lemon, and destroy each other ; nor is there room enough to retire back and see half of the new; and Sir Joshua's washy Virtues make the Nativity a dark spot from the darkness of the Shep- 262 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1785. herds, which happened, as I knew it would, from most of Jarvis's colours not being transparent. I have not seen the improvements at Blenheim. I used to think it one of the ugliest places in England; a gianf s castle, who had laid waste aU the country round him. Everybody now aUows the merit of Brown's achievements there.* Of aU ydur survey I wish most to see Beau Desert War wick Castle and Stowe I know by heart The first I had rather possess than any seat upon earth : not that I think it the most beautiful of all, though charming, but because I am so intimate with aU its proprietors for the last thousand years. I have often and often studied the new plan of Stowe : it is pompous; but though the wings are altered, they are not lengthened. Though three parts of the edifices in the garden are bad, they enrich that insipid country, and the vastness pleases me more than I can defend. I rejoice that your jaunt has been serviceable to Lady Ailesbury. The Charming man^ is actually with me; but neither he nor I can keep our promise incontinently. He ex pects two sons of his brother Sir Williara, whora he is to pack up and send to the Peres de I'Oratoire at Paris. I expect Lord and Lady Waldegrave to-morrow, who are to pass a few days with me ; but both the Charming man and I will be with you soon, I have no objection to a wintry visit: as I can neither ride nor walk, it is more comfortable when most of my time is passed within doors. If I continue perfectly well, as I am, I shall not settle in town till after Christmas : there will not be half a dozen persons there for whora I care a straw. ' " CapabiUty Brown ; " for an account of whom, see vol. ii. p. 399. " I took," says Hannah More, " a very agreeable lecture from my friend Mr. Brown in his art, and he promised to give me taste by inoculation. I am sure he has a charming one ; and he illustrates everything he says about gardening by some literary or grammatical allusion. He told me he compared his art to Uterary composition. ' Now, there,' said he, pointing his finger, ' I make a comma; and there,' pointing to another spot, ' where a more decided turn is proper, I make a colon : at another part (where an interruption is desirable to break the view), a paren thesis — now a fuU stop ; and then I begin another subject.' ' Memoirs, vol. i. p. 26. — E. ' Edward Jerningham, Esq. See post, September 4, 1789. — E. 1786. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 263 I know nothing at all. The peace between the Austrian harpy and the frogs is made. They were stout and preferred being gobbled to parting with their money. At last, France offered to pay the money for thera. The harpy blushed — for the first time — and would not take it; but signed the peace, and will plunder somebody else. Have you got Boswell's raost absurd enormous book ? * The best thing in it is a bon-mot of Lord Pembroke.'^ The more one learns of Johnson, the more preposterous assemblage he appears of strong sense, of the lowest bigotry and prejudices^ of pride, brutality, fretfulness, and vanity ; and Boswell is the ftpe of most of his faults, without a grain of his sense. It is the story of a mountebank and his zany. I forgot to say, that I wonder how, with your turn, and knowledge, and enterprise, in scientific exploits, you carae not to visit the Duke of Bridgwater's operations; or did you omit them, because I should not have understood a word you told me ? Adieu ! TO THE EARL OF CHARLEMONT.^ Strawberry HiU, Nov. 23, 1785. As your lordship has given me this opportunity, I cannot resist saying, what I was exceedingly tempted to mention two or three years ago, but had not the confidence. In short, my lord, when the order of St Patrick was instituted, I had a * The " enormous book," of which Walpole here speaks so dispa ragingly, is BosweU's popular " Journal of his Tour to the Highlands and Islands of Scotland with Dr. Johnson, in the autumn of 1773." It is now incorporated with the author's general narrative of the Doc tor's Ufe in Mr. Croker's edition of 1831 ; and not the least interesting circumstance connected with it is, that Johnson himself read, from time to time, BosweU's record of his sayings and doings ; and, so far from being displeased with its minuteness, expressed great admiration of its accuracy, and encouraged the chronicler to proceed with his grand ulte rior proceeding. See Life, vol. i. p. viu. ed. 1835.— E. ' " Lord Pembroke said once to me at Wilton, that Dr. Johnson's sayings would not appear so extraordinary, were it not for his bota-wow way," Ibid, vol. iv. p. 8. — E. ' Now first coUected. 264 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1785. mind to hint to your lordship that it was exactly the moment for seizing an occasion that has been irretrievably lost to this country. When I was at Paris, I found in the convent of Les Grands Augustins three vast chambers filled with the portraits (and their names and titles beneath) of all the knights of the St. Esprit from the foundation of the order. Every new knight, with few exceptions, gives his own portrait on his creation. Of the order of St Patrick, I think but one founder is dead yet; and his picture perhaps raay be re trieved. I will not make any apology to so good a patriot as your lordship, for proposing a plan that tends to the honour of his country, which I will presume to call mine too, as it is both by union and my affection for it, I should wish the name of the painter inscribed too, which would excite emula tion in your artists. But it is unnecessary to dilate on the subject to your lordship ; who, as a patron of the arts, as well as a patriot, will improve on my imperfect thoughts, and, if you approve of them, can give them stabihty. I have the honour to be, my lord, &c. TO LADY BROWNE,* Berkeley Square, Dec, 14, 1785. I AM extremely obliged to your ladyship for your kind letter ; and, though I cannot write myself, I can dictate a few lines. This has not been a regular fit of tbe gout but a worse case : one of my fingers opened with a deposit of chalk,* and brought on gout and both together an inflamraation and sweUing- almost up to my shoulder. In short I was forced to have a surgeon, who has managed me so judiciously, that both the inflammation and swelhng are gone ; and nothing re- ' Now first printed. ' " Neither years nor sufferings," writes Hannah More to her sister, " can abate the entertaining powers of the pleasant Horace, which rather improve than decay; though he himself says he is only fit to be a milk woman, as the chalk-stones at his fingers' ends qualify him for nothing but scoring ; but he declares he wiU not be a Bristol milk-woman. I was obliged to recount to him aU that odious tale." Memoirs, vol. ii. p. 14.— E. 1785. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE, 265 mains but the wound in my finger, which will heal as soon as all the chalk is discharged. My surgeon wishes me to take the air; but I am so afraid of a relapse, that I have not yet consented. My poor old friend is a great loss ; * but it did not much surprise me, and the manner comforts me. I had played at cards with her at Mrs. Gostling's three nights before I came to town, and found her extremely confused, and not knowing what she did : indeed, I perceived something of the sort be fore, and had found her much broken this autumn. It seems, that the day after I saw her, she went to General Lister's burial and got cold, and had been ill for two or three days. On the Wednesday morning she rose to have her bed raade ; and while sitting on the bed, with her maid by her, sunk down at once, and died without a pang or a groan. Poor Mr, Raftor is struck to the greatest degree, and for some days would not see anybody, I sent for him to town to me ; but he vrill not come till next week. Mrs. Prado has been so excessively humane as to insist on his coming to her house tiU his sister is buried, which is to be to-night. The Duchess does not come till the 26th. Poor Miss Bun- bury is dead ; and Mrs. Boughton, I hear, is in a very bad way. Lord John Russell has sent the Duchess of Bedford word, that he is on the point of marrying Lord Torrington's eldest daughter; and they suppose the wedding is over,^ Your ladyship, I ara sure, will be pleased to hear that Lord Euston is gone to his father, who has written a letter with the highest approbation of Lady Euston.' You will be diverted, too. Madam, to hear that Hecate has told Mrs. Keppel, that she was sure that such virtue would be rewarded at last. ' The incomparable Kitty CUve; who died at Twickenham on the 6th of December, in her seventy-second year. — E. ' Lord John Russell, who, in 1802, succeeded his brother Francis as sixth Duke of Bedford, married, at Brussels, in March 1786, Georgiana Elizabeth, second daughter of Lord Torrington. — E. ' Lord Euston, who, in 1811, succeeded his father as fourth Duke of Grafton, married, in November 1784, Charlotte Maria, daughter of the Earl of Waldegrave. — E. 266 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1786. TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Berkeley Square, Feb. 9, 1786. It is very cruel, my dear Madam, when you send me such charming lines, and say such kind and fiattering things to me and of me, that I cannot even thank you with my own poor hand ; and yet ray hand is as much obhged to you as my eye, and ear, and understanding. My hand was in great pain when your present arrived. I opened it directly, and set to reading, till your music and my own vanity composed a quiet ing draught that glided to the ends of my fingers, and lulled the throbs into the deliquium that attends opium when it does not put one absolutely to sleep. I don't believe that the deity who formerly practised both poetry and physic, when gods got their Uvelihood by more than one profession, ever gave a recipe in rhyme; and therefore, since Dr. Johnson has pro hibited application to pagan divinities, and Mr. Burke has not struck medicine and poetry out of the hst of sinecures, 1 wish you may get a patent for life for exercising both faculties. It would be a comfortable event for me; for, since I cannot wait on you to thank you, nor dare ask you • to caU your doves yourself. and visit me in your Parnassian quality, I might send for you as my physicianess. Yet why should not I ask you to come and see me ? You are not such a prude as to blush to show compassion, though it should not chance this vear to be the fashion.' And I can tell you, that powerful as your poetry is, and old as I am, I believe a visit from you would do me as much good almost as your verses.'^ In the meantime, I beg you to accept ' See " Florio," a poetical tale, which Miss Hannah More had re cently pubUshed with the ''Bas Bleu." — E. ' On the llth, Hannah More paid him a visit. " I made poor Vesey," she says, " go with me on Saturday to see Mr. Walpole, who has had a 1786. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 267 of an addition to your Strawberry editions ; and beheve me to be, with the greatest gratitude, your too much honoured and most obliged humble servant. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Sunday night, June 18, 1786. I SUPPOSE you have been swearing at the east wind for parching your verdure, and are now weeping for the rain that drowns your hay. I have these calamities in common, and my constant and particular one, — people that come to see my house, which unfortunately is more in request than ever. Al ready I have had twenty-eight sets, have five more tickets given out ; and yesterday, before I had dined, three German barons came. My house is a torment, not a comfort ! I was sent for again to dine at Gunnersbury on Friday, and was forced to send to town for a dress-coat and a sword. There were the Prince of Wales, the Prince of Mecklen burg, the Duke of Portland, Lord Clanbrassil, Lord and Lady Clermont Lord and Lady Southampton, Lord Pelham, and Mrs. Howe. The Prince of Mecklenburg went back to Windsor after coffee; and the Prince and Lord and Lady Clermont to town after tea, to hear sorae new French players at Lady William Gordon's. The Princess, Lady Barrymore, and the rest of us, played three pools at commerce till ten. I am afraid I was tired and gaped. While we were at the dairy, the Princess insisted on my making sorae verses on Gunnersbury. I pleaded being superannuated. She would not excuse rae. I promised she should have an ode on her long illness. Notwithstanding his sufferings, I never found him so plea sant, so witty, and so entertaining. He said a thousand diverting things about ' Florio;' but accused me of having imposed on the world by a dedication fuU of falsehood; meaning the compUment to himself. I never knew a man sufi^er pain with such entire patience. This submis sion is certainly a most valuable part of reUgion ; and yet, alas ! he is not religious. I must, however, do him the justice to say, that, except the delight he has in teazing me for what he caUs over-strictness, I never heard a sentence from him which savoured of infideUty." Memoirs, vol. U. p. 11. — E. 268 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1786. next birthday, which diverted the Prince ; but all would not do. So, as I came home, I made the following stanzas, and sent them to her breakfast next morning : — In deathless odes for ever green Augustus' laurels blow; Nor e'er was grateful duty seen In warmer strains to flow. Oh ! why is Flaccus not alive. Your favourite scene to sing? To Gunnersbury's charms could give His lyre immortal spring. As warm as his my zeal for you. Great princess ! could I show it : But though you have a Horace too — Ah, Madam ! he 's no poet. If they are but poor verses, consider I am sixty-nine, was half asleep, and made them alraost exterapore — and by com mand ! However, they succeeded, and I received this gra cious answer : — " I wish I had a name that could answer your pretty verses. Your yawning yesterday opened your vein for pleasing me ; and I return you my thanks, my good Mr. Walpole, and re main sincerely your friend, " Amelia." I think this is very genteel at seventy-five. Do you know that I have bought the Jupiter Serapis as well as the Julio Clovio !* Mr. * * * * assures me he has seen six of the head, and not one of them so fine, or so well preserved, I am glad Sir Joshua Rejmolds saw no more ex cellence in the Jupiter than in the Clovio; or the Duke of Portland, I suppose, would have purchased it as he has the vase for a thousand pounds, I would not change, I told Sir William Hamilton and the late Duchess, when I never thought it would be mine, that I had rather have the head than the vase. I shaU long for Mrs. Damer to make a bust to it and then it * At the sale of the Duchess-dowager of Portland. 1786. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 269 will be still more valuable. I have deposited both the Illumi nation* and the Jupiter in Lady Di.'s cabinet,^ which is worthy of them. And here my collection winds up ; I will not pur chase trumpery after such jewels. Besides, everything is much dearer in old age, as one has less tirae to enjoy. Good night ! TO RICHARD GOUGH, ESQ. Berkeley Square, June 21, 1786. On coming to town yesterday upon business, I found, Sir, your very magnificent and most valuable present,^ for which I beg you will accept my most grateful thanks. I am impatient to return to Twickenham, to read it tranquilly. As yet I have only had time to turn the prints over, and to read the preface; but I see already that it is both a noble and laborious work, and will do great honour both to you and to your country. Yet one apprehension it has given me — I fear not living to see the second part ! Yet I shall presume to keep it unbound ; not only till it is perfectly dry and secure, but, as I mean the binding should be as fine as it deserves, I should be afraid of not having both volumes exactly alike. Your partiality, I doubt. Sir, has induced you to insert a paper not so worthy of the pubhc regard as the rest of your splendid performance. My letter to Mr. Cole,* which I am sure I had utterly forgotten to have ever written, was a hasty indigested sketch, like the rest of my scribblings, and never calculated to lead such well-meditated and accurate works as yours. Having lived familiarly with Mr. Cole from our boy hood, I used to write to him carelessly on the occasions that occurred. As it was always on subjects of no importance, I never thought of enjoining secrecy. I could not foresee that * The Book of Psalms, with twenty-one iUuminations, by Don Julio Clovio, scholar of Julio Romano. — E. ' A cabinet at Strawberry Hill, built in 1776, to receive seven incom parable drawings of Lady Diana Beauclerc, for Walpole's tragedy of « The Mysterious Mother."— E. " The first volume of Mr. Gough's " Sepulchral Monuments in Great Britain." — E. * See vol. v. p. 245.— E. 270 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1786. such idle coraraunications would find a place in a great national work, or I should have been more attentive to what I said. Your taste. Sir, I fear, has for once been misled ; and I shall be sorry for having innocently blemished a single page. Since your partiality (for such it certainly was) has gone so far, I flatter myself you will have retained enough to accept not a retribution, but a trifling mark of my regard, in the little volume that accompanies this; in which you will find that another too favourable reader has bestowed on me raore dis tinction than I could procure for myself, by turning my slight Essay on Gardening* into the pure French of the last age f and, which is wonderful, has not debased Milton by French poetry: on the contrary, I think Milton bas given a dignity to French poetry — nay, and harmony; both which I thought that lan guage alraost incapable of receiving. As I would wish to give all the value I can to my offering, I will mention, that I have printed but four hundred copies, half of which went to France ; and as this is an age in which mere rarities are pre ferred to commoner things of intrinsic worth, — as I have found by the ridiculous prices given for some of my insignificant pub lications, merely because they are scarce, — I hope, under the title of a kind of curiosity, my thin piece will be admitted into your library. If you would indulge me so far. Sir, as to let me know when I might hope to see the second part, I would calculate how many more fits of the gout I may weather, and would be still more strict in my regimen. I hope, at least, that you will not wait for the engravers, but will accom- phsh the text for the sake of the world : in this I speak dis interestedly. Though you are much younger than I am, I would have your part of the work secure : engravers may always proceed, or be found ; another author cannot. ' The author of " The Pursuits of Literature"— " Well pleased to see Walpole and Nature may, for once, agree," adds, in a note, " read (it well deserves the attention) that quaint, but most curious and learned, writer's excellent Essay on Modern Garden ing." — E. " Besides Walpole's Essay ongModern Gardening, the Due de Niver nois translated Pope's Essay on Man, and a portion of MUton's Paradise Lost, into French verse. — E. 1786. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 271 TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Strawberry Hill, August 29, 1786. Since I received the honour of your lordship's last I have been at Park-place for a few days- Lord and Lady Frederick Campbell and Mrs. Damer were there. We went on the Thames to see the new bridge at Henley, and Mrs. Damer's colossal masks. There is not a sight in the island more worthy of being visited. The bridge is as perfect as if bridges were natural productions, and as beautiful as if it had been built for Wentworth Castle ; and the masks, as if the Romans had left them here. We saw them in a for tunate moment ; for the rest of the time was very cold and uncomfortable, and the evenings as chill as many we have had lately. In short, I ara come to think that the beginning of an old ditty, which passes for a collection of blunders, was really an old English pastoral, it is so descriptive of our climate : " Three children sUding on the ice AU on a summer's day " I have been overwhelmed more than ever by visitants to my house. Yesterday I had Count Oginski,* who was a pretender to the crown of Poland at the last election, and has been stripped of raost of a vast estate. He had on a ring of the new King of Prussia, or I should have wished hira joy on the death of one of the plunderers of his country.^ It has long been my opinion that the out-pensioners of Bedlam are so numerous, that the shortest and cheapest way would be to confine in Moorfields the few that remain in their senses, who would then be safe ; and let the rest go at large. They are the out-pensioners who are for destroying poor dogs ! The whole canine race never did half so much mischief as Lord George Gordon ; nor even worry hares, but when hallooed on by men. As it is a persecution of ' Father of Count Michel Oginski, the associate of Kosciusko, and author of " Memoires sur La Pologne et les Polonais, depuis 1788 jusqu'a la fin de 1815 ; " in four volumes octavo. Paris, 1826.— E. ' Frederick the Great had died on the 17th, at BerUn.— E. 272 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1780, animals, I do not love hunting ; and what old writers men tion as a commendation makes me hate it the more, its being an image of war. Mercy on us ! that destruction of any species should be a sport or a merit ! What cruel un reflecting imps we are ! Everybody is unwiUing to die ; yet sacrifices the lives of others to momentary pastime, or to the still emptier vapour, fame I A hero or a sportsman who wishes for longer hfe is desirous of prolonging devastation. We shaU be crammed, I suppose, with panegyrics and epi taphs on the King of Prussia ; I am content that he can now have an epitaph. But alas ! the Emperor wUl write one for him probably in blood ! and, while he shuts up convents for the sake of population, will be stuffing hospitals with maimed soldiers, besides making thousands of widows ! I have just been reading a new pubhshed history of the Col leges in Oxford, by Anthony Wood ; and there found a feature in a character that always offended me, that of Archbishop Chicheley, who prompted Henry the Fifth to the invasion of France, to divert him from squeezing the overgrown clergy. When that priest meditated founding AU Souls, and " con sulted his friends (who seem to have been honest men) what great matter of piety he had best perform to God in his old age, he was advised by them to buUd an hospital for the wounded and sick soldiers that daily returned from the wars then had in France ;" — I doubt his grace's friends thought as I do of his artifice ; — " but," continues the historian, " disliking those motions, and valuing the welfare of the deceased more than the wounded and diseased, he resolved with hiraself to pro mote his design, which was, to have masses said for the King, Queen, and himself, &c. while living, and for their souls when dead." And that mummery the old foolish rogue thought more efficacious than ointments and medicines for the wretches he had made ! And of the chaplains and clerks he instituted in that dormitory, one was to teach grammar, and another prick-song. How history makes one shudder and laugh by turns ! But I fear I have wearied your lordship with my idle declamation, and you will repent having coramanded me to send you more letters. 1786. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 273 TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberiy HUl, Oct. 29, 1786. I WAS sorry not to be apprised of your intention of going to town, where I would have met you; but I knew it too late, both as I was engaged, and as you was to return so soon. I mean to come to Park-place in a week or fortnight : but I should like to know what company you expect, or do not expect ; for I had rather fill up your vacancies than be a su pernumerary. Lady Ossory has sent me two charades made by Colonel Fitzpatrick : the first she says is very easy, the second very difficult. I have not corae within sight of tbe easy one ; and, though 1 have a guess at the other, I do not believe I am right ; and so I send them to you, who are master-general of the CEdipuses. The first, that is so easy : — " In concert, song, or serenade. My first requires my second's aid. To those residing near the pole I would not recommend my whole." The two last lines, I conclude, neither connect with the two first nor will help one to deciphering them. The difficult one : — " Charades of aU things are the worst, But yet my best have been my first. Who with my second are concern'd, WiU to despise my whole have learn'd." This sounds like a good one, and therefore I will not tell you my solution ; for, if it is wrong, it might lead you astray ; and if it is right, it would prove the charade is not a good one. Had I anything better, I would not send you charades, un less for the name of the author. I have had a letter from your brother, who tells me that he VOL. VI. T 274 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1786. has his grandson Stewart* with him, who is a prodigy. I say to myself. Prodigies are grown so frequent. That they have lost their name. I have seen prodigies in plenty of late, ay, and formerly too ; but divine as they have all been, each has had a mortal heel, and has trodden back a vast deal of their celestial path ! I beg to be excused from any more credulity. I am sorry you have lost your fac-totum Stokes. I sup pose he had discovered that he was too necessary to you. Every day cures one of reliance on others ; and we acquire a prodigious stock of experience, by the time that we shall cease to have occasion for any. Well ! I am not clear but making or solving charades is as wise as anything we can do. I should pardon professed phUosophers if they would allow that their wisdom is only trifling, instead of calling their trifling wisdom. Adieu ! TO THE RIGHT HON. LADY CRAVEN.^ Berkeley Square, Nov. 27, 1786. To my extreme surprise. Madam, when I knew not in what quarter of the known or unknown world you was re sident or existent my maid in Berkeley-square sent me to Strawberry-hill a note from your ladyship, offering to call on * Robert, eldest son of Robert Stewart, by Lady Sarah-Frances Sey mour, second daughter of Francis, first Marquis of Hertford ; afterwards so distinguished in the poUtical world as Viscount Castlereagh. In 1821, he succeeded his father as second Marquis of Londonderry, and died at his seat at North Cray, in August 1822; at which time he was secretary of state for foreign affairs. — E. * This celebrated lady was the daughter of Augustus, fourth Earl of Berkeley. In 1767, she was married to WiUiam, who, in 1769, succeeded his uncle as sixth Lord Craven : she had seven chUdren by him ; but, after a union of thirteen years, a separation taking place, she left England for France, and travelled in Italy, Austria, Poland, Russia, Turkey, and Greece. In 1789, she published her " Journey through the Crimea to England." Subsequently, she settled at Anspach, and, becoming a wi dow in September 1791, was united in the following month to the Mar grave of Anspach; who, having sold his principality to the King of Prussia, settled in England ; where he died in 1806. In 1825, the Mar gravine pubUshed her Memoirs. She died at Naples in 1828. — E. GT.Harimg,FS.Aaa. :EiLii^iUB]EinEri, €®UfMing^j>g ®if cH^'^rigMo I7i(M TJTB QEaG-imh BY a.KiMITEY.Jir TJJJi COIdJ'.'c'TJcW AT SIKtiWBEKECi^ SILL. lonckni, Tiililislied'bjrKicliaxlBea-aej, 1640 1786. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 275 me for a moment, — for a whirlwind, I suppose, was waiting at your door to carry you to Japan ; and, as balloons have not yet settled any post-offices in the air, you could not, at least did not give me any' direction where to address you, though you did kindly reproach me with my sUence. I must enter into a little justification before I proceed. I heard from you from Venice, then from Poland, and then, having whisked through Tartary, from Petersburgh ; but still with no direc tions. I said to myself, " I will write to Grand Cairo, which, probably, will be her next stage." Nor was I totally in the wrong, for there came a letter from Constantinople, with a design mentioned of going to the Greek islands, and orders to write to you at Vienna ; but with no banker or other ad dress specified. For a great while I had even stronger reasons than these for silence. For several months I was disabled by the gout from holding a pen ; and you must know. Madam, that one can't write when one cannot Write. Then, how write to la Eianc'ee du Hoi de Garbe 1 You had been in the tent of the Cham of Tartary, and in the harem of the Captain Pacha, and, during your navigation of the ^gean, were possibly fallen into the terrible power of a corsair. How could I suppose that so many despotic infidels would part with your charms? I never expected you again on Christian ground. I did not doubt your having a talisman to make people in love with you ; but anti-talismans are quite a new specific. Well, while I was in this quandary, I received a de lightful drawing of the Castle of Otranto; but stUl pro- vokingly without any address. However, my gratitude for so very agreeable and obliging a present could not rest till I found you out I wrote to the Duchess of Richraond, to beg she would ask your brother Captain Berkeley for a di rection to you; and he has this very day been so good as to send me one, and I do not lose a moment in making use of it I give your ladyship a million of thanks for the drawing, which was really a very valuable gift to me. I did not even know that there was a Castle of Otranto. When the story T 2 276 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1787. was finished, I looked into the map of the kingdom of Naples for a well-sounding name, and that of Otranto was very so norous. Nay, but the drawing is so satisfactory, that there are two small windows, one over another, and looking into the country, that suit exactly to the small chambers from one of which Matilda heard the young peasant singing beneath her. Judge how welcome this must be to the author; and thence judge, Madam, how much you must have obliged him. When you take another fiight towards the bounds of the western ocean, remember to leave a direction. One cannot always shoot flying. Lord Chesterfield directed a letter to the late Lord Pembroke, who was always swimming, " To the Earl of Pembroke in the Thames, over against White hall." That was sure of finding him within a certain number of fathom; but your ladyship's longitude varies so rapidly, that one must be a good bowler indeed, to take one's ground so judiciously that by casting wide of the mark one may come in near to the jack. TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Berkeley Square, Jan. 1, 1787. Do not imagine, dear Madam, that I pretend in the most distant manner to pay you for charming poetry with insipid prose ; much less that I acquit a debt of gratitude for flatter ing kindness and friendship, by a meagre tale that does not even aim at celebrating you. No ; I have but two motives for offering you the accompanying trifle : * the first, to prove that the moment I have finished anything, ymi are of the earliest in my thoughts : the second, that, coming from my press, I wish it may be added to your Strawberry editions. It is so far from being designed for the public, that I have printed but forty copies ; which I do not mention to raise its value, though it will with mere collectors, but lest you should lend it and lose it when I may not be able to supply its place. ' Christine de Pise. 1787- THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 277 Christina, indeed, has some title to connection with you, both from her learning and her moral writings; as you are justly entitled to a lodging in her " Cite des Dames," where I am sure her three patronesses would place you, as a favourite ilive of some of their still more amiable sisters, who must at this moment be condoling with their unfortunate sister Grati tude, whose vagabond foundling has so basely disgraced her and herself. You fancied that Mrs. Yearsley was a spurious issue of a muse ; and to be sure, with all their immortal vir ginity, the parish of Parnassus has been sadly charged with their bantlings ; and, as nobody knows the fathers, no wonder some of the misses have turned out woful reprobates ! TO THE RIGHT HON. LADY CRAVEN. Berkeley Square, Jan. 2, 1787. YouK ladyship tells me, that you have kept a journal of your travels : you know not when your friends at Paris will give you time to put it au net; that is, I conclude and hope, prepare it for the press. I do not wonder that those friends, whether talismanic or others, are so assiduous, if you indulge them : but unless they are of the former description, they are unpardonable, if they know what they interrupt; and deserve much more that you should wish they had fallen into a ditch, than the poor gentlemen who sigh more to see you in sheets of hoUand than of paper. To me the mischief is enormous. How proud I should be to register a noble authoress of my own country, who has travelled over more regions and farther than any female in print ! Your ladyship has visited those islands and shores whence formerly issued those travelling sages and legislators who sought and imported wisdom, laws, and religion into Greece ; and though we are so perfect as to want none of those comraodities, the fame of those philoso phers is certainly diminished when a fair lady has gone as far in quest of knowledge. You have gone in an age when travels are brought to a juster standard, by narrations being limited to truth. 278 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1787. Formeriy the perforraers of the longest voyages destroyed half the merit of their expeditions by relating, not what they had, but had not seen; a sort of communication that they might have imparted without stirring a foot from home. Such exaggerations drew discredit on travels, till people would not believe that there existed in other countries anything very different from what they saw in their own ; and because no Patagonians, or gentry seven or eight feet high, were really discovered, they would not believe that there were Laplanders or pigmies of three and four. Incredulity went so far, that at last it was doubted whether China so much as existed ; and our countryman Sir John MandevUle* got an ill name, because, though he gave an account of it he had not brought back its right name : ^ at least if I do not mistake, this was the case ; but it is long since I read^anything about the matter, and I am willing to begin ray travels again under your ladyship's auspices. I am sorry to hear. Madam, that by your account Lady Mary Wortley was not so accurate and faithful as mo dem travellers. The invaluable art of inoculation, which she brought from Constantinople, so dear to all admirers of beauty, and to which we owe, perhaps, the preservation of yours, stamps her an universal benefactress; and as you rival her in poetic talents, I had rather you would employ them to cele brate her for her nostrum, than detect her for romancing. However, genuine accounts of the interior of seraglios would be precious ; and I was in hopes would become the greater rarities, as I flattered myself that your friends the Empress of Russia and the Emperor were determined to level Ottoman tyranny. His Imperial Majesty, who has demolished the prison-bars of so many nunneries, would perform a still more Christian act in setting free so many useless sultanas ; and her Czarish Majesty, I trust, would be as great a benefactress to ' As an instance of the monstrous exaggerations of this ancient Mun chausen, take the foUowing : — " I am a liar if I have not seen in Java a single sheU in which three men might completely hide themselves, and aU white ! " He also states himself to have met with whole nations of giants, twenty-five feet high ; and of pigmies, as many inches. — E. ' In a conversation with Mr. Windham, Dr. Johnson, a few days be fore his death, " recommended, for an account of China, Sir John Man- deville's Travels." See BosweU's Johnson, vol. ix. p. 317, ed. 1835. — E. 1787. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 279 our sex, by abohshing the barbarous practice that reduces us to be of none. Your ladyship's indefatigable peregrinations should have such great objects in view, when you have the ear of sovereigns. Peter the Hermit conjured up the first crusadoes against the infidels by running about from monarch to monarch. Lady Craven should be as zealous and as renowned; and every fair Circassian would acknowledge, that one English lady had repaid their country for the secret which another had given to Europe frora their practice. TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Berkeley Square, Feb. 23, 1787. DEAR MADAM, I NOT only send you " La Cite des Dames," but Chris tina's Life of Charles the Fifth, which will entertain you more ; and which, when I wrote my brief history of her, I did not know she had actually composed. Mr. Dutens told me of it very lately, and actually borrowed it for me ; and but yes terday my French bookseller sent me three-and-twenty other volumes of those Memoires Historiques * which I had ordered him to get for me, and which will keep ray eyes to the oar for some time, whenever I have leisure to sail through such an ocean ; and yet I shall embark with pleasure, late as it is for me to undertake such a hugeous voyage : but a crew of old gossips are no improper company, and we shall sit in a warm cabin, and hear and tell old stories of past times. Pray keep the volume as long as you please, and borrow as many more as you please, for each volume is a detached piece. Yet I do not suppose your friends will allow you rauch time for reading in town; and I hope I shall often be the better for their hindering you.*^ Yours most sincerely. * " Collection des meiUeurs Ouvrages Fran9ais composes par des Femmes ; " by Mademoiselle Keralio. ' Miss More, in a letter written a few days after, says — " Mr. Wal pole is remarkably well : yesterday he sent me a very agreeable letter, with some very thick volumes of curious French M^moii'es, desiring me, 280 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1787. TO THE REV. HENRY ZOUCH.* Berkeley Square, March 13, 1787. It is very true. Sir, as Lord Strafford told you, that I have taken care that letters of living persons to me shall be restored to the writers when I die. I have burnt a great many, and, as you desire it, would do so by yours ; but having received a like intimation some time ago, I put yours into a separate paper, with a particular direction that they should be delivered to you: and, therefore, I imagine it will be more satisfaction to you, as it will be to me too, that you should receive them yourself; and therefore, if you please to let me know how I shall convey them, I will bring them from Straw berry-hill, where they are, the first time I go thither. I hope you enjoy your health, and I have the honour to be. Sir, &c. to TO MISS HANNAH MORE.^ Strawberry HiU, June 15, 1787. In your note, on going out of town, you desired rae to remember you ; but as I do not like the mere servile merit of obedience, I took time, my dear Madam, to try to forget you ; and, having failed as to my wish, I have the free-born pleasure of thinking of you in spite of my teeth, and without any re gard to your injunction. No queen upon earth, as fond as royal persons are of their prerogative, but would prefer being loved for herself rather than for her power ; and I hope you have not more majesty " Than the whole race of queens." Perhaps the spirit of your command did not mean that I should give you such manual proof of my remerabrance ; and you may not know what to make of a subject who avows a mutinous spirit and at the same time exceeds the measure of if I like them, to send for the other twenty-three volumes ; a prettv light undertaking, in this mad town and this short life." Memoirs vol. ii. p. 49. — E. ' Now first printed. ' Now first coUected. 1787. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 281 his duty. It is, I own, a kind of Irish loyalty ; and, to keep up the Irish character, I will confess that I never was disposed to be so loyal to any sovereign that was not a subject. If you collect from all this galamatias that I am cordially your humble servant I shall be content. The Irish have the best hearts in the three kingdoms, and they never blunder more than when they attempt to express their zeal and affection: the reason, I suppose, is, that cool sense never thinks of attempt ing impossibihties ; but a warm heart feels itself ready to do more than is possible for those it loves. I am sure our poor friend in Clarges-street* would subscribe to this last sentence. What English heart ever excelled hers? I should almost have said equalled, if I were not writing to one that rivals her. The last time I saw her before I left London, Miss Burney - passed the evening there, looking quite recovered and well, and so cheerful and agreeable, that the court seems only to have improved the ease of her manner, instead of stamping more reserve on it, as I feared : but what slight graces it can give, will not compensate to us and the world for the loss of her company and her writings. Not but that some young ladies who can write, can stifle their talent as much as if they were under lock and key in the royal library. I do not see but a cottage is as pernicious to genius as the Queen's wait ing-room. Why should one remember people that forget them selves ? Oh ! I am sorry I used that expression, as it is commonly applied to such self-oblivion as Mrs. ; and hght and darkness are not more opposite than the forgetful- ' In a letter to Walpole, written at this time from Cowslip Green, Miss More says — " When I sit in a little hermitage I have built in my gar den, — not to be melancholy in, but to think upon my friends, and to read their works and letters, — Mr. Walpole seldomer presents himself to my mind as the man of wit than as the tender-hearted and humane friend of my dear infirm, broken-spirited Mrs. Vesey. One only admires talents, and admiration is a cold sentiment, with which affection has commonly nothing to do ; but one does more than admire them when they are de voted to such gentle purposes. My very heart is softened when I consi der that she is now out of the way of your kind attentions, and I fear that nothing else on earth gives her the smaUest pleasure." Memoirs, vol. ii. p. 72.— E. ' This highly-gifted young lady had, in the preceding year, been ap pointed keeper of the robes to the Queen. — E. 282 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1787. ness to which I alluded, and hers. The former forgetfulness can forget its own powers and the injuries of others ; the lat ter can forget its own defects, and the obligations and services it has received. How poor is that language which has not distinct terms for modesty and virtue, and for excess of vanity and ingratitude ! The Arabic tongue, I suppose, has specific words for all the shades of oblivion, which, you see, has its extremes. I think I have heard that there are some score of different terms for a lion in Arabic, each expressive of a dif ferent quality ; and consequently its generosity and its appetite for blood are not confounded in one general word. But if an Arabian vocabulary were as numerous in proportion for all the qualities that can enter into a human composition, it would be more difficult to be learned therein, than to master all the characters of the Chinese. You did me the honour of asking me for my " Castle of Otranto," for your library at Cowslip Green. May I, as a printer, rather than as an author, beg leave to furnish part of a shelf there? and as I must fetch some of the books from Strawberry-hill, will you wait till I can send thera all together? And will you be so good as to tell me whither I shall send them, or how direct and convey them to you at Bristol ? I shall have a satisfaction in thinking that they will remain in your rising cottage (in which, I hope, you wUl enjoy a long series of happy hours) ; and that they will sometimes, when they and I shall be forgotten in other places, recall to Miss More's raeraory her very sincere humble servant. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry HiU, June 17, 1787. I HAVE very httle to tell you since we met but disappoint ments, and those of no great consequence. On Friday night Lady Pembroke wrote to me that Princess Lubomirski was to dine with her the next day, and desired to come in the morning to see Strawberry. WeU, my castle put on its robes, breakfast was prepared, and I shoved another company out of 1787. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 283 the house, who had a ticket for seeing it. The sun shone, my hay was cocked, we looked divinely ; and at half an hour after two, nobody came but a servant from Lady Pembroke, to say her Polish altitude had sent her word she had another en gagement in town that would keep her too late : — so Lady Pembroke's dinner was addled; and we had nothing to do, but, like good Christians, if we chose it to compel everybody on the road, whether they chose it or not, to corae in and eat our soup and biscuits. Methinks this liberum veto was rather irapertinent, and I begin to think that the partition of Poland was very right. Your brother has sent me a card for a ball on Monday, but I have excused rayself I have not yet compassed the whole circuit of my own garden, and I have had an inflammation in one of ray eyes, and don't think I look as well as ray house and my verdure ; and had rather see my hay-cocks, than the Duchess of Polignac and Madarae Luborairski. " The Way to keep Him" had the way to get me, and I could crawl to it, because I had an inclination ; but I have a great command of myself when I have no mind to do anything. Lady Constant was worth an hundred acs and irskis. Let me hear of you when you have nothing else to do ; though I suppose you have as little to tell as you see I had. TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Strawberry HUl, July 28, 1787. Saint Swithin is no friend to correspondence, my dear lord. There is not only a great sameness in his own pro ceedings, but he makes everybody else dull — I mean in the country, where one frets at its raining every day and all day. In town he is no more minded than the proclaraation against vice and immorality. Still, though he has all the honours of the quarantine, I believe it often rained for forty days long before St. Swithin was born, if ever born he was; and the proverb was coined and put under his patronage, because people observed that it frequently does rain for forty days 284 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1787. together at this season. I remember Lady Suffolk telhng me, that Lord Dysart's great meadow had never been mowed but once in forty years without rain. I said, " All that that proved was, that rain was good for hay," as I am persuaded the climate of a country and its productions are suited to each other. Nay, rain is good for haymakers too, who get more employment the oftener the hay is made over again. I do not know who is the saint that presides over thunder; but he has made an unusual quantity in this chill summer, and done a great deal of serious mischief, though not a fiftieth part of what Lord George Gordon did seven years ago, and happily he is fled. Our little part of the world has been quiet as usual. The Duke of Queensberry has given a sumptuous dinner to the Princesse de LambaUe* — et voild tout. I never saw her, not even in France. I have no particular penchant for sterling princes and princesses, much less for those of French plate. The only entertaining thing I can tell your lordship from our district is, that old Madam French, who lives close hy the bridge at Hampton-court, where, between her and the Thames, she had nothing but one grass-plot of the width of her house, has paved that whole plot with black and white marble in diamonds, exactly like the floor of a church ; and this curious metamorphosis of a garden into a pavement has cost her three hundred and forty pounds : — a tarpaulin she might have had for some shilhngs, which would have looked as well, and might easily have been removed. To be sure, this exploit, and Lord Dudley's obelisk heloio a hedge, with his canal at right angles with the Thames, and a sham bridge no broader than that of a violin, and parallel to the river, are not preferable to the monsters in dipt yews of our an cestors ; ' Sister to the Prince de Carignan, of the royal house of Sardinia, and wife of the Prince de LambaUe, only son to the Due de Penthievre. She was sur-intendante de la maison de la Reine, and, from her attach ment to Marie Antoinette, was one of the first females who fell a victim to the fury of the French revolution. The peculiar circumstances of horror which attended her death, and the indignities offered to her remains, are in the memory of every on£ who has read the accounts of that heart-rending event — E. 1787. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 285 Bad taste expeUas furcS., tamen usque recurret. On the contrary, Mrs. Walsingham is making her house at Ditton (now baptized Boyle-farm) very orthodox. Her daughter Miss Boyle,* who has real genius, has carved three tablets in marble with boys, designed by herself Those sculptures are for a chimney-piece ; and she is painting pan nels in grotesque for the library, with pilasters of glass in black and gold. Miss Crewe, who has taste too, has de corated a room for her mother's house at Richmond, which was Lady Margaret Corapton's, in a very pretty manner. How much more amiable the old women of the next age will be, than raost of those we remeraber, who used to tumble at once from gallantry to devout scandal and cards ! and revenge on the young of their own sex the desertion of ours. Now they are ingenious, they will not want amusement. Adieu, my dear lord ! TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Strawberry HUl, Oct. U, 1787. MY DEAK MADAM, I AM shocked for human nature at the repeated male volence of this woman ! ^ The rank soil of riches we are ac customed to see overrun with weeds and thistles ; but who could expect that the kindest seeds sown on poverty and dire misfortunes should meet with nothing hut a rock at bottom ? Catherine de' Medici, suckled by popes and transplanted to a throne, seems more excusable. Thank heaven. Madam, for giving you so excellent a heart; ay, and so good a head. You are not only benevolence itself; but, with fifty times the genius of a Yearsley, you are void of vanity. How ' Afterwards married to Lord Henry Fitzgerald. ^ Walpole had recently received a letter from Miss More, in which she had said — " My old friend the milk-woman has just brought out another book, to which she has prefixed my original preface to her first book, and twenty pages of the scurrility published against me in her second. To all this she has added the deed which I got drawn up by an eminent lawyer to secure her money in the funds, and which she asserts I made Mrs. Montagu sign without reading." Memoirs, vol. U. p. 80. — E. 286 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1787. Strange, that vanity should expel gratitude ! Does not the wretched woman owe her fame to you, as well as her af fluence ? I can testify your labours for both. Dame Yearsley reminds me of the Troubadours, those vagrants whom I used to admire tiU I knew their history ; and who used to pour out trumpery verses, and flatter or abuse' accordingly as they were housed and clothed, or dismissed to the next parish. Yet you did not set this person in the stocks, after procuring an annuity for her I I beg your pardon for renewing so dis gusting a subject and will never mention it again. You have better amusement ; you love good works, a temper superior to revenge.* I have again seen our poor friend in Clarges-street: her faculties decay rapidly, and of course she suffers less. She has not an acquaintance in town ; and yet told me the town was very full, and that she had had a good deal of company. Her health is re-established, and we must now be content that her mind is not restless. My pity now feels most for Mrs. Hancock,^ whose patience is inexhaustible, though not insensible. Mrs. Piozzi, I hear, has two volumes of Dr. Johnson's Letters ready for publication,^ Bruce is printing his Travels ; which I suppose will prove that his narratives were fabulous, ' Mrs. Yearsley was a woman of strong masculine understanding, and of a powerful independent mind, which could not brook anything in the nature of dictation or interference. Whether she then was a widow, or separated from her husband, I know not ; but, in 1793, she kept a book seller and stationer's shop, under the name of Ann Yearsley, at Bristol Hot-wells, assisted by her son, and there all sorts of literary discussion used to take place daily amongst those who frequented it; and Mrs. Yearsley being somewhat free, both in her political and religious opinions, as well as not a little indignant at Mrs. More's attempt at holding a control over her proceedings, it is not matter of wonder, that a very un reasonable asperity should have been exhibited on both sides. — G. ^ " What a blessing for Mrs. Vesey, that Mrs. Hancock is alive and well ! I do venerate that woman beyond words ; her faithful, quiet, patient attachment makes all showy qualities and shining talents appear little in my eyes. Such characters are what Mr. Burke caUs ' the soft quiet green, on which the soul loves to rest ! ' " Hannah More's Me moirs, vol. ii. p. 80. — E. * In speaking of these Letters, which appeared shortly after, Hannah More says — " They are such as ought to have been written, but ought not to have been printed : a few of them are very good : sometimes he 1787. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 287 as he will scarce repeat them by the press. These, and two more volumes of Mr. Gibbon's History, are all the literary news I know. France seems sunk indeed in all respects. What stuff are their theatrical goods, their Richards, Ninas, and Tarares ! But when their Figaro could run threescore nights, how despicable must their taste be grown !* I rejoice that their political intrigues are not more creditable- I do not dislike the French from the vulgar antipathy between neighbouring nations, but for their insolent and unfounded airs of superiority. In arms we have almost always out shone them : and till they have excelled Newton, and come near to Shakspeare, pre-eminence in genius must reraain with us. I think they are most entitled to triumph over the Ita lians ; as, with the most meagre and inharmonious of all lan guages, the French have made more of that poverty in tragedy and eloquence, than the Italians have done with the lan guage the raost capable of both. But I did not mean to send you a dissertation. I hope it will not be long before you remove to Hampton. — Yet why should I wish that? You will only be geographically nearer to London till Fe bruary. Cannot you now and then sleep at the Adelphi on a visit to poor Vesey and your friends, and let one know if you do ? is moral, and sometimes he is kind. The imprudence of editors and executors is an additional reason why men of parts should be afraid to die. Burke said to me the other day, in allusion to the innumerable Uves, anecdotes, remains, &c. of this great man, ' How many maggots have crawled out of that great body ! ' " Memoirs, vol. ii. p. 101. — E. ' Mr. Walpole had never seen Figaro acted, nor had he been at Paris for many years before it appeared : he was not, therefore, aware of the bold, witty, and continued aUusions of almost every scene and of almost every incident of that comedy, to the most popular topics and the most distinguished characters of the day. The freedom with which it treated arbitrary government and all its estabUshments, whUe they aU yet continued in unwelcome force in France, and the moral conduct of each individual of the piece exactly suiting the no-morality of the audience, joined to the admirable manner in which it was acted, certainly must be aUowed to have given it its greatest vogue. But even now, when most of these temporary advantages no longer exist, whoever was weU ac quainted with the manners, habits, and anecdotes of Paris at the time of the first appearance of Figaro, will always admire in it a combination of keen and pointed satire, easy wit, and laughable incident. — B. 288 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1787. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Berkeley Square, Nov. 11, 1787. From violent contrary winds,' and by your letter going to Strawberry HiU, whence I was come, I have but just re ceived it and perhaps shall only be able to answer it by snatches, being up to the chin in nephews and nieces. I find you knew nothing of the pacification when you wrote. When I saw your letter, I hoped it would tell me you was coming back, as your island is as safe as if it was situated in the Pacific Ocean, or at least as islands there used to be, till Sir Joseph Banks chose to put them up. I sent you the good news on the very day before you wrote, though I imagined you would learn it by earlier intelligence. Well, I enjoy both your safety and your great success, which is enhanced by its being owing to your character and abilities. I hope the latter will be aUowed to operate by those who have not quite so much of either. I shall be wonderful glad to see little Master Stonehenge^ at Park-place ; it will look in character there : but your own bridge is so stupendous in comparison, that hereafter the latter will be thought to have been a work of the Romans. Dr. Stukeley will burst his cerements to offer misletoe in your temple ; and Mason, on the contrary, will die of vexa tion and spite that he cannot have Caractacus acted on the spot Peace to all such ! But were there one whose fires True genius kindles, and fair fame inspires, he would immortalize you, for all you have been carrying on in Jersey, and for all you shall carry off. Inigo Jones, or Charlton,' or somebody, I forget who, called Stonehenge " Chorea Gigantum :" this will be the chorea of the pigmies ; • Mr. Conway was at this time at his government in Jersey. ' Mr. Walpole thus calls the small Druidic temple discovered in Jer sey, which the States of that island had presented to General Conway, to be transported to and erected at Park-place. ' Dr. Walter Charlton published a dissertation on Stonehenge in 1663, entitled "Chorea Gigantum." It was reprinted in 1715. — E. 1788. THE HON. HORACE WALtOLE. 289 and, as I forget too what is Latin for Lilhputians, I will make a bad pun, and say, Portantur avari PygmaUonis opes. Pygmalion is as well-sounding a narae for such a monarch as Oberon. Pray do not disappoint me, but transport the ca thedral* of your island to your domain on our continent. I figure unborn antiquaries making pilgriraages to visit your bridge, your daughter's bridge,^ and the Druidic temple ; and if I were not too old to have any imagination left I would add a sequel to Mi Li.^ Adieu ! TO THOMAS BARRETT, ESQ." Berkeley Square, June 5, 1788. I WISH I could charge myself with any merit which I always wish to have towards you, dear Sir, in letting Mr. Matthew see Strawberry ; but in truth he has so much merit and modesty and taste himself, that I gave him the ticket with pleasure, which it seldom happens to me to do; for most of those who go thither, go because it is the fashion, and because a party is a prevailing custom too; and my tranquillity is disturbed, because nobody likes to stay at home. If Mr. Matthew was really entertained I am glad ; but Mr. Wyatt has made him too correct a Goth not to have seen all the imperfections and bad execution of my at tempts ; for neither Mr. Bentley nor my workmen had studied the science, and I was always too desultory and impatient to consider that I should please myself more by allowing time,' than by hurrying my plans into execution before they w«re ' The Druidic temple. " The key-stones of the centre arch of the bridge at Henley are orna mented with heads of the Thames and Isis, designed by the Hon. Mrs. Damer, and executed by her in Portland stone. ' One of the Hieroglyphic tales, containing a description of Park- place. It will be found in Walpole's works. * Of Lee, in East Kent ; whose seat was built by Mr. Wyatt, and greatly admired by WalpOle. — E. VOL. VI. U 290 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1788. ripe. My house therefore is but a sketch by beginners, yours is finished by a great master; and if Mr. Matthew hked mine, it was en virtuose, who loves the dawnings of an art or the glimmerings of its restoration. I finished Mr. Gibbon a fuU fortnight ago, and was ex tremely pleased. It is a most wonderful mass of information, not only on history, but almost on all the ingredients of his tory, as war, government, commerce, coin, and what not. If it has a fault it is in embracing too much, and consequently in not detailing enough, and in striding backwards and for wards from one set of princes to another, and frora one sub ject to another ; so that without much historic knowledge, and without much memory, and much method in one's, me mory, it is almost irapossible not to be sometimes bewildered : nay, his own impatience to tell what he knows, makes the author, though commonly so explicit not perfectly clear in his expressions. The last chapter of the fourth volume, I own, made me recoil, and I could scarcely push through it. So far from being Cathohc or heretic, I wished Mr, Gibbon had never heard of Mopophysites, Nestorians, or any such fools ! But the sixth volume made ample amends ; Maho met and the Popes were gentlemen and good company. I abominate fractions of theology and reformation. Mr. Sheridan, I hear, did not quite satisfy the passionate expectation that had been raised ; * but it was impossible he could, when people had worked themselves into an enthu siasm of offering fifty — ay, fifty guineas for a ticket to hear ' Of his speech in Westminster-hall, on bringing forward the Begum charge against Mr. Hastings ; upon which Mr. Burke pronounced the high eulogium, that " all the various species of oratory that had been heard, either in ancient or modern times — whatever the acuteness of the bar, the dignity of the senate, or the morality of the pulpit could furnish — ^had not.been equal to what the House had that day heard." Gibbon, who was present, thus describes it, in a letter to Lord Sheffield : — " Yester day the august scene was closed for this year. Sheridan surpassed him self ; and, though I am far from considering him as a perfect orator, there were many beautiful passages in his speech — on justice, filial love, &c. ; one of the closest chains of argument I ever heard, to prove that Hastings was responsible for the acts of Middleton ; and a compliment, much admired, to a certain historian of your acquaintance. Sheridan, on the close of his speech, sunk into Burke's arms — a good actor : but I called this morning ; he is perfectly well." — E. 1788. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 291 him. Well ! we are sunk and deplorable in many points, yet not absolutely gone, when history and eloquence throw out such shoots ! I thought I had outlived my country ; I am glad not to leave it desperate ! Adieu, dear Sir ! TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Strawberry Hill, Tuesday night, June 17, 1788. I GUESS, my dear lord, and only guess, that you are ar rived at Wentworth Castle. If you are not, my letter will lose none of its bloom by waiting for you ; for I have nothing fresh to tell you, and only write because you enjoined it. I settled in my Lilliputian towers but this morning. I wish people would come into the country on May-day, and fix in tovra the 1st of November. But as they will not I have made up my mind; and having so little time left, I prefer London, when my friends and society are in it, to hving here alone, or with the weird sisters of Richmond and Harapton. I had additional reason now, for the streets are as green as the fields : we are burnt to the bone, and have not a lock of hay to cover our nakedness : oats are so dear, that I suppose they will soon be eaten at Brooks's and fashionable tables as a rarity. The drought has lasted so long, that for this fort night I have been foretelling hayraaking and winter, which June generally produces ; but to-day is sultry, and I am not a prophet worth a straw. Though not resident till now, I have flitted backwards and forwards, and last Friday came hither to look for a minute at a ball at Mrs. Walsingham's at Ditton; which would have been very pretty, for she had stuck coloured lamps in the hair of all her trees and bushes, if the east wind had not danced a reel all the tirae by the side of the river. Mr. Conway's play,* of which your lordship has seen some account in the papers, has succeeded dehghtfully, both in ' A comedy, called " False Appearances," translated from L'Homme du Jour of Boissy. It was first acted at the private theatre at Rich mond-house, and afterwards at Drury-lane. — E. u 2 292 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1788. representation and applause. The language is most genteel, though translated from verse; and both prologue and epi logue are charming. The former was delivered raost justly and adrairably by Lord Derby, and tbe latter with iniraitable spirit and grace by Mrs. Damer. Mr. Merry and Mrs. Bruce played excellently too. But General Conway, Mrs. Damer, and everybody else are drowned by Mr. Sheridan, whose renown has engrossed all Fame's tongues and trumpets. Lord Townshend said he should be sorry were he forced to give a vote directly on Hastings, before he had time to cool ; and one of the peers saying the speech had not made the same impression on him, the Marquis replied, a seal might be finely cut and yet not be in fault for making a bad im pression. I have, you see, been forced to send your lordship what scraps I brought from town : the next four months, I doubt, will reduce me to my old sterility ; for I cannot retail French gazettes, though as a good Englishman bound to hope they will contain a civil war. I care still less about the double imperial campaign, only hoping that the poor dear Turks will heartily beat both Emperor and Empress. If the first Ot tomans could be punished, they deserved it, but the present possessors have as good a prescription on their side as any people in Europe. We ourselves are Saxons, Danes, Nor mans ; our neighbours are Franks, not Gauls ; who the rest are, Goths, Gepidae, Heruli, Mr. Gibbon knows; and the Dutch usurped the estates of herrings, turbots, and other marine indigenae. StUl, though I do not wish the hair of a Turk's beard to be hurt I do not say that it would not be amusing to have Constantinople taken, merely as a lusty event; for neither could I hve to see Athens revive, nor have I much faith in two such bloody-minded vultures, cock and hen, as Catherine and Joseph, conquering for the benefit of humanity; nor does my Christianity admire the propagation of the Gospel by the mouth of cannon. What desolation of peasants and their faraihes by the episodes of forage and quarters ! Oh ! I wish Catherine and Joseph were brought to Westminster-haU and worried by Sheridan ! I hope, too, that 1788. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 293 the poor Begums are ahve to hear of his speech ; it wiU be some comfort though I doubt nobody thinks of restoring them a quarter of a lac ! TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Strawberry HiU, July 4, 1788. I AM soundly rejoiced, my dear Madam, that the present summer is more favourable to me than the last ; and that in stead of not answering my letters in three months, you open the campaign first May not I flatter myself that it is a symptom of your being in better health? I wish, however, you had told me so in positive words, and that all your com plaints have left you. Welcome as is your letter, it would have been ten tiraes raore welcome bringing me that assur- rance ; for don't think I forget how ill you was last winter. As letters, you say, now keep their coaches, I hope those from Bristol will call often at my door.* I promise you I will never be denied to them. No botanist am I ; nor wished to learn from you, of all the Muses, that piping has a new signification. I had rather that you handled an oaten pipe than a carnation one ; yet setting layers, I own, is preferable to reading newspapers, one of the chronical maladies of this age. Everybody reads them, nay quotes them, though everybody knows they are stuffed with hes or blunders. How should it be otherwise ? If any ex traordinary event happens, who but must hear it before it de scends through a coffee-house to the runner of a daily paper? They who are always wanting news, are wanting to hear they don't know what A lower species, indeed, is that of the scribes you mention, who every night compose a journal for ' Miss More, in her last letter, had said — " Mail-coaches, which come to others, come not to me : letters and newspapers, now that they travel in coaches, like gentlemen and ladies, come not within ten miles of my hermitage :_ and while other fortunate provincials are studying the world and its ways, and are feasting upon elopements, divorces, and sui cides, tricked out in aU the elegancies of Mr. Topham's phraseology, I am obliged to be contented with vUlage vices, petty iniquities, and vul gar sins." Memoirs, vol. U. p. 77. — B. 294 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1788. the satisfaction of such illiterati, and feed them with all the vices and misfortunes of every private family ; nay, they now call it a duty to pubhsh all those calamities which decency to wretched relations used in compassion to suppress, 1 mean self-murder in particular. Mr. 's was detaUed at length ; and to-day that of Lord and The pretence is, in terrorem, like the absurd stake and high way of our ancestors ; as if there were a precautionary potion for madness, or the stigma of a newspaper were more dreadful than death. Daily journalists, to be sure, are most respect able magistrates ! Yes, much like the cobblers that Crom well made peers. I do lament your not going to Mr. Conway's play: both the author and actors deserved such an auditor as you, and you deserved to hear thera. However, I do not pity good people who out of virtue lose or miss any pleasures. Those pastimes fieet as fast as those of the wicked ; but when gone, you saints can sit down and feast on your self-denial, and drink bumpers of satisfaction to the health of your own merit So truly I don't pity you. You say you hear no news, yet you quote Mr. Topham ; * therefore why should I tell you that the King is going to Cheltenham ? or that the Baccelli lately danced at the Opera at Paris with a blue bandeau on her forehead, inscribed, Honi soit qui mat y pense !^ Now who can doubt but she is as pure as the Countess of Salisbury ? ^ Was not it ingenious ? and was not the ambassador so to allow it ? No doubt he took it for a compliment to his own knee. ' Major Topham was the proprietor of the fashionable morning paper entitled The World. " In this paper," says Mr. Gifford, in his pre face to the Baviad, " were given the earliest specimens of those un qualified and audacious attacks on aU private character, which the town first smiled at for their quaintness, then tolerated for their absurdity ; and — now that other papers equally wicked and more intelligible, have ventured to imitate it — will have to lament to the last hour of British liberty." In 1791, Major Topham published the Life of John Elwes the miser ; which Walpole considered one of the most amusing anecdotical books in the English language. — E. " WhUe the Duke of Dorset, who kept her, was ambassador at Paris. ' The Countess of Salisbury, to the fall of whose garter has been at tributed the foundation of the order of the Garter. 1788. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 295 Well ! would we committed nothing but folhes ! What do we not commit when the abolition of slavery hitches ! Adieu ! Though Cato died, though Tully spoke, Though Brutus dealt the godlike stroke. Yet perish'd fated Rome. You have written; and I fear that even if Mr. Sheridan speaks, trade, the modern religion, will predominate. Adieu ! TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Strawberry HiU, July 12, 1788. Won't you repent having opened the correspondence, my dear Madam, when you find my letters come so thick upon you ? In this instance, however, I am only to blame in part for being too ready to take advice, for the sole reason for which advice ever is taken, — because it fell in with my in clination. You said in your last that you feared you took up time of mine to the prejudice of the public ; implying, I imagine, that I might employ it in composing. Waving both your compli ment and ray own vanity, I will speak very seriously to you on that subject, and with exact truth. My simple writings have had better fortune than they had any reason to expect; and I fairly believe, in a great degree, because gentlemen-writers, who do not write for interest are treated with some civility if they do not write absolute nonsense. I think so, because I have not unfrequently known much better works than mine much more neglected, if the name, fortune, and situation of the authors were below mine. I wrote early, from youth, spirits, and vanity ; and from both the last when the first no longer existed. I now shudder when I reflect on my own boldness; and with mortification, when I compare my own writings with those of any great authors. This is so true, that I question whether it would be possible for me to sum mon up courage to publish anything I have written, if I could recall tirae past, and should yet think as I think &t present. 296 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1788. So much for what is over and out of my power. As to writ ing now, I have totally forsworn the profession, for two solid reasons. One I have already told you ; and it is, that I know my own writings are trifling and of no depth. The other is, that, light and futile as they were, I am sensible they are better than I could compose now. I am aware of the decay of the middling parts I had, and others raay be still more sensible of it. How do I know but I am superannuated? nobody will be so coarse as to tell me so ; but if I published dotage, all the world would tell me so. And who but runs that risk who is an author after seventy? What happened to the greatest author of this age, and who certainly retained a very considerable portion of his abilities for ten years after my age ? Voltaire, at eighty-four I think, went to Paris to receive the incense, in person, of his countrymen, and to be witness of their admiration of a tragedy he had written at that Methusalem age. Incense he did receive till it choked him ; and at the exhibition of his play he was actually crowned with laurel in the box where he sat. But what became of his poor play ? It died as soon as he did — was buried with him ; and no mortal, I dare to say, has ever read a line of it since, it was so bad.' As I am neither by a thousandth part so great nor a quar ter so little, I wUl herewith send you a fragment that an ac cidental rencontre set me upon writing, and which I found so flat that I would not finish it Don't beheve that I am either begging praise by the stale artifice of hoping to be contradicted ; or that I think there is any occasion to make you discover my caducity. No; but the fragment contains a curiosity — English verses written by a French prince of the blood, and which at first I had a mind to add to my Royal and Noble Authors ; but as he was not a royal author of ours, ' Madame du Deffand, in a letter to Walpole of the 8th of March 1778, says — "Voltaire se porte bien: il est uniquement occupg de sa trag^die d'Irene ; on assure qu'on la jouera de demain en huit : si eUe n'a ^as de succes, U en mourra." On the 18th, she again writes " Le succes de la piece a €t6 tres mediocre ; il y eut cependant beaucoup de claquemens de mains, mais c'etait plus Voltaire qui en ^tait I'objet que la piece." He died in the May following. — E. 1788. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 297 and as I could not please myself with an account of him, I shall revert to my old resolution of not exposing my pen's gray hairs.* Of one passage I raust take notice; it is a little indirect sneer at our crowd of authoresses. My choosing to send this to you is a proof that I think you an author, that is, a classic. But in truth I am nauseated by tbe Madams Piozzi, &c. and the host of novel-writers in petticoats, who think they iraitate what is inimitable, Evelina and Cecilia. Your candour I know will not agree with me, when I tell you I am not at all charmed with Miss Seward and Mr. Hayley piping to one another: but you I exhort, and would encourage to write; and flatter myself you will never be royally gagged and pro raoted to fold rauslins, as has been lately wittily said on Miss Burney, in the list of five hundred living authors. Your writings promote virtues ; and their increasing editions prove their worth and utility. If you question my sincerity, can you doubt my admiring you, when you have gratified my self-love so amply in your Bas Bleu ? Still, as much as I love your writings, I respect yet more your heart and your goodness. You are so good, that I believe you would go to heaven, even though there were no Sunday, and only six working days in the week. Adieu, my best Madam ! TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Strawberry HiU, August 2, 1788. Matter for a letter, alas ! my dear lord, I have none ; but about letters I have great news to tell your lordship, only may the goddess of post-offices grant it be true ! A Miss Sayer, of Richmond, who is at Paris, writes to Mrs. Bos cawen, that a Baron de la Garde (I am sorry there are so many a's in the genealogy of my story,) has found in a vieille ' The French prince of the blood here spoken of, was Charles Duke of Orleans, who being taken prisoner at the battle of Azincourt, was brought to England, and detained here for twenty-five years. For a copy of the verses, see Walpole's works, vol. i. p. 564. — E. 298 CORRESPONDENCE OP 1788. armoire five hundred more letters of Madame de Sevigne, and that they will be printed, if the expense is not too great. I am in a taking lest they should not appear before I set out for the Elysian fields; for, though the writer is one of the first personages I should inquire after on my arrival, I question whether St Peter has taste enough to know where she lodges. He is more likely to be acquainted with St Catherine of Sienna and St Undecimillia ; and therefore I had rather see the letters theraselves. It is true I have no small doubt of the authenticity of the legend ; and nothing will persuade me of its truth so much as the non-appearance of the letters — a melancholy kind of conviction. But I vehemently suspect some new coinage, like the letters of Ninon de TEnclos, Pope Ganganelli, and the Princess Palatine. I have lately been reading some fragraents of letters of the Duchess of Orleans, which are certainly genuine, and contain some curious circum stances; for though she was a simple gossiping old gentle woman, yet many little facts she could not help learning : and, to give her her due, she was ready to tell all she knew. To our late Queen she certainly did write often; and her Ma jesty, then only Princess, was full as ready to pay her in her own coin, and a pretty considerable treaty of commerce for the exchange of scandal was faithfully executed between them; insomuch that I remember to have heard forty years ago, that our gracious sovereign entrusted her Royal High ness of Orleans with an intrigue of one of her women of the bedchamber, Mrs. Selwyn to wit; and the good Duchess en trusted it to so many other dear friends, that at last it got into the Utrecht Gazette, and came over hither, to the signal edi fication of the court of Leicester-fields. This is an addi tional reason, besides the internal evidence, for my believing the letters genuine. This old dame was mother of the Re gent; and when she died, somebody wrote on her tomb, Cy gist rOisivete. This came over too; and nobody could ex pound it till our then third Princess, Caroline, unravelled it, — Idleness is the mother of all vice. I wish well enough to posterity to hope that dowager high nesses will imitate the practice, and write all the trifles that 1788. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 299 occupy their royal brains; for the world so at least learns some true history, which their husbands never divulge, espe cially if they are privy to their own history, which their minis ters keep from them as much as possible. I do not believe the present King of France knows much more of what he, or rather his Queen, is actually doing, than I do. I rather pity him; for I believe he means well, which is not a comraon article of ray faith. I shall go about the end of this week to Park-place, where I expect to find the Druidic temple from Jersey erected. How dull will the world be, if constant pilgrimages are not made thither ! where, besides the delight of the scenes, that temple, the rude great arch. Lady Ailesbury's needle-works, and Mrs. Damer's Thame and Isis on Henley- bridge, with other of her sculptures, make it one of the most curious spots in the island, and unique. I want to have Mr. Conway's comedy acted there ; and then the father, mother, and daughter would exhibit a theatre of arts as uncommon. How I regret that your lordship did not hear Mrs. Damer speak the epilogue ! TO JOHN PINKERTON, ESQ.* Strawberry HUl, August 14, 1788. Your intelligence of the jubUees to be celebrated in Scotland in honour of the Revolution was welcome indeed. It is a favourable symptom of an age when its festivals are founded on good sense and liberality of sentiment and not to perpetuate superstition and slavery. Your countrymen, Sir, have proved their good sense too in their choice of a poet. Your writings breathe the noble generous spirit congenial to the institution. Give me leave to say that it is very fiatter ing to me to have the ode communicated to me ; I will not say, to be consulted, for of that distinction I am not worthy : I am not a poet and am sure I cannot improve your ideas, which you have expressed with propriety and clearness, the ¦ Now first collected. 300 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1788. necessary ingredients of an address to a populous raeeting; for I doubt our numerous audiences are not arrived at Olym pic taste enough to seize with enthusiasm the eccentric flights of Pindar. You have taken a more rational road to inspira tion, by adhering to the genuine topics of the occasion ; and you speak in so manly a style, that I do not beheve a raore corapetent judge could araend your poetry. I will tell you how more than occasionally the mention of Pindar slipped into my pen. I have frequently, and even yesterday, wished that some attempt were made to ennoble our horse-races, particularly at Newmarket, by associating better arts with the courses ; as, by contributing for odes, the best of which should be rewarded by raedals. Our nobility would find their vanity gratified ; for, as the pedigrees of their steeds would soon grow tiresorae, their own genealogies would replace them ; and, in the mean time, poetry and medals would be improved. Their lordships would have judgment enough to know if their horse (which should be the impression on one side) were not well executed; and, as I hold that there is no being more difficult to draw well than a horse, no bad artist could be employed. Such a beginning would lead farther; and the cup or plate for the prize might rise into beautiful vases. But this is a vision ; and I may as well go to bed and dream of anything else. TO MISS HANNAH MORE.* Strawberry HiU, August 17, 1788. DEAR MADAM, In this great discovery of a new mine of Madame de Se vigne's letters, my faith, I confess, is not quite firm. Do people seU houses wholesale, without opening their cupboards? This age, too, deals so much in false coinage, that booksellers and Birmingham give equal vent to what is not sterling; with the only difference, that the shUlings of the latter pretend that the names are effaced, whUe the wares of the former pass ' Now first collected. 1788. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 301 under borrowed names. Have we not seen, besides all the Testamens Politiques, the spurious letters of Ninon de I'En clos, of Pope Ganganelli, and the Memoirs of the Princess Palatine? This is a little mortifying, while we know that there actually exists at Naples a whole library of genuine Greek and Latin authors; most of whom, probably, have never been in print : and where it is not unnatural to suppose the works of some classics, yet lost, may be in being, and the remainder of sorae of the best Yet, at the rate in which they proceed to unroll, it would take as raany centuries to bring them to light, as have elapsed since they were overwhelmed. Nay, another eruption of Vesuvius may return all the volumes to chaos ! Omar is stigmatized for burning the library of Alexandria. Is the King of Naples less a Turk ? Is not it almost as unconscientious to keep a seragho of virgin authors under the custody of nurses, as of blooming Circassians? Consider, ray dear Madam, I am past seventy; or I should not be so ungallant as to make the sraallest eoraparison be tween the contents of the two harems. Your picture, which hangs near my elbow, would frown, I am sure, if I had any light meaning. TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Strawberry HUl, Sept. 12, 1788. My late fit of gout, though very short was a very authen tic one, my dear lord, and the third I have had since Christ mas. Still, of late years, I have suffered so little pain, that I can justly complain of nothing but the confinement, and the debility of my hands and feet which, however, I can still use to a certain degree; and as I enjoy such good spirits and health in the intervals, I look upon the gout as no enemy ; yet I know it is like the compacts said to be made with the devil, (no kind comparison to a friend !) who showers his favours on the contractors, but is sure to seize and carry them off at last I would not say so much of myself, but in return to your 302 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1788. lordship's obhging concern for me : yet insignificant as the subject I have no better in bank; and if I plume myself on the tolerable state of my outward man, I doubt your lord ship finds that age does not treat my interior so mildly as the gout does the other. If my letters, as you are pleased to say, used to amuse you, you raust perceive how insipid they are grown, both from my decays and from the little intercourse I have with the world. Nay, I take care not to aim at false vivacity : what do the attempts of age at liveliness prove but its weakness ? What the Spectator said wittily, ought to be practised in sober sadness by old folks : when he was dull, he declared it was by design. So far, to be sure, we ought to observe it as not to affect more spirits than we possess. To be purposely stupid, would be forbidding our correspondents to continue the intercourse ; and I am so happy in enjoying the honour of your lordship's friendship, that I will be content (if you can be so) with my natural inanity, without studying to increase it I have been at Park-place, and assure your lordship that the Druidic temple vastly more than answers my expectation. Small it is, no doubt when you are within the enclosure, and but a chapel of ease to Stonehenge ; but Mr. Conway has placed it with so much judgment, that it has a lofty effect, and infinitely more than it could have had if he had yielded to Mrs. Damer's and my opinion, who earnestly begged to have it placed within the enclosure of the home-grounds. It now stands on the ridge of the high hill without, backed by the horizon, and with a grove on each side at a little dis tance ; and, being exalted beyond and above the range of firs that climb up the sides of the hill from the valley, wears all the appearance of an ancient castle, whose towers are only shattered, not destroyed ; and devout as I ara to old castles, and small taste as I have for the ruins of ages absolutely barbarous, it is impossible not to be pleased with so very rare an antiquity so absolutely perfect and it is difficult to pre vent visionary ideas from improving a prospect. If, as Lady Anne ConoUy told your lordship, I have had a great deal of company, you must understand it of my house, not of me ; for I have very little. Indeed, last Monday both 1788. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 303 my house and I were included. The Duke of York sent me word the night before, that he would come and see it and of course I had the honour of showing it myself. He said, and indeed it seemed so, that he was much pleased ; at least I had every reason to be satisfied ; for I never saw any prince more gracious and obliging, nor heard one utter more per sonally kind speeches. I do not find that her grace the Countess of Bristol's* will is really known yet They talk of two wills — to be sure, in her double capacity; and they say she has raade three co heiresses to her jewels, the Empress of Russia, Lady Salis bury, and the whore of Babylon.^ The first of those legatees, I ara not sorry, is in a piteous scrape: I like the King of Sweden no better than I do her and the Eraperor; but it is good that two destroyers should be punished by a third, and that two crocodiles should be gnawed by an insect. Thank God ! we are not only at peace, but in full plenty — nay, and in full beauty too. Still better; though we have bad rivers of rain, it has not, contrary to aU precedent, washed away our warm weather. September, a month I generally dislike for its irresolute mixture of warm and cold, has hitherto been pereraptorily fine. The apple and walnut- trees bend down with fruit, as in a poetic description of Pa radise. TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Strawberry Hill, Sept. 22, 1788. I don't hke to defraud you of your compassion, my good friend, profuse as you are of it 1 really suffered scarce any pain at all from my last fit of gout. I have known several persons who think there is a dignity in complaining; and, if you ask how they do, reply, " Why, I am — pretty well — to day; but if you knew what I suW&coA yesterday !" Now me- ' The Duchess of Kingston, who died at Paris in August. — E. ' The newspapers had circulated a report, that the Duchess had be queathed her diamonds to the Empress of Russia and his Holiness the Pope.— E. 304 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1788. thinks nobody has a right to tax another for pity on what is past ; and besides, complaint of what is over can only make the hearer glad you are in pain no longer. Yes, yes, my dear Madam, you generally place your pity so profitably, that you shall not waste a drop upon me, who ought rather to be congratulated on being so well at ray age. Much less shall I allow you to make apologies for your admirable and proper conduct towards your poor protegee.'- And now you have told me the behaviour of a certain great dame, I will confess to you that I have known it sorae raonths by accident — nay, and tried to repair it. I prevailed on Lady * * * * *j who as readily undertook the commission, and told the Countess of her treatment of you. Alas ! the answer was, " It is too late ; I have no money." No ! but she has, if she has a diamond left I am indignant ; yet, do you know, not at this duchess, or that countess, but at the invention of ranks, and titles, and pre-eminence. I used to hate that king and t'other prince ; but, alas ! on refiection I find the censure ought to fall on human nature in general. They are made of the same stuff as we, and dare we say what we should be in their situation? Poor creatures ! think how they are educated, or rather corrupted, early, how flattered ! To be educated properly, they should be led through hovels, and hospitals, and prisons. Instead of being reprimanded (and perhaps imraediately after sugar-plum" d) for not learning their Latin or French grammar, they now and then should be kept fasting ; and, if they cut their finger, should have no plaister till it festered. No part of a royal brat's memory, which is good enough, should be burthened but with the remembrance of human sufferings. In short, I fear our na ture is so liable to be corrupted and perverted by greatness, rank, power, and wealth, that I am inclined to think that virtue is the compensation to the poor for the want of riches : nay, I am disposed to believe that the first footpad or highwayman had been a man of quality, or a prince, who could not bear having wasted his fortune, and was too lazy to work; for a beggar-born would think labour a more na- • Ann Yearsley. See ante, p. 286. — E. 1788. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 305 tural way of getting a livelihood than venturing his life. I have something a similar opinion about common women. No modest girl thinks of many men, till she has been in love with one, been ruined by him, and abandoned. But to return to my theme, and it will fall heavy on yourself. Could the milkwoman have been so bad, if you had merely kept her from starving, instead of giving her opulence? The soil, I doubt, was bad; but it could not have produced the rank weed of ingratitude, if you had not dunged it with gold, which rises from rock, and seems to meet with a congenial bed when it falls on the human heart -A.nd so Dr. Warton imagines I am writing " Walpoliana !" No, in truth, nor anything else ; nor shall — nor will I go out in a jest-book. Age has not only made me prudent but luckily, lazy; and, without the latter extinguisher, I do not know but that farthing candle my discretion would let ray snuff of life flit to the last sparkle of folly, hke what chil dren call the parson and clerk in a bit of burnt paper. You see by ray writability in pressing my letters on you, that my pen has still a colt's tooth left but I never indulge the poor old child with more paper than this small-sized sheet ; I do not give it enough to make a paper kite and fly abroad on wings of booksellers. You ought to continue writing, for you do good by your writings, or at least mean it ; and if a virtuous intention fails, it is a sort of coin, which, though thrown away, still makes the donor worth more than he was before he gave it away. I dehght too in the temperature of your piety, and that you would not see the enthusiastic exorcist How shock ing to suppose that the Omnipotent Creator of worlds dele gates his power to a momentary insect to eject supernatural spirits that he had permitted to infest another insect and had permitted to vomit blasphemies against himself! Pray do not call that enthusiasm, but delirium. I pity real enthusiasts, but I would shave their heads and take away some blood. The exorcist's associates are in a worse predicament, I doubt, and hope to make enthusiasts. If such abominable impostors were not rather a subject of indignation, I could smile at the rivalship between them and the animal magnetists, who are VOL. VI. x 306 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1788. inveigling fools into their different pales. And alas! while folly has a shUling left there wiU be enthusiasts and quack doctors; and there wiU be slaves whUe there are kings or sugar-planters.* I have remarked, that though Jesuists, &c. travel to distant East and West to propagate their religion and traffic, I never heard of one that made a journey into Asia or Africa to preach the doctrines of hberty, though those regions are so deplorably oppressed. Nay, I much doubt whether ever any chaplain of the regiments we have sent to India has once whispered to a native of Bengal, that there are milder forms of government than those of his country. No ; security of property is not a wholesome doctrine to be incul cated in a land where the soil produces diamonds and gold ! In short if your Bristol exorcist behoves he can cast out devils, why does he not go to Leadenhall-street ? There is a company whose name is legion. By your gambols, as you caU them, after the most ungambol- ing peeress in Christendom, and by your jaunts, I conclude, to my great satisfaction, that you are quite well. Change of scene and air are good for your spirits; and September, like aU our old ladies, has given itself May airs, and raust have made your journey very pleasant Yet you will be glad to get back to your Cowshp-green, though it may offer you nothing but Michaelmas daisies. When you do leave it I wish you could persuade Mrs. Garrick to settle sooner in London. There is fuU as good hay to be made in town at Christmas as at Hampton, and some hay-makers that will wish for you particularly. Your most sincere friend. * In the letter to which this is a reply. Miss More had said — " In vain do we boast of the enlightened eighteenth century, and conceitedly talk as if human reason had not a manacle left about her, but that philo sophy had broken down all the strongholds of prejudice, ignorance, and superstition; and yet at this very time Mesmer has got an hundred thousand pounds by animal magnetism in Paris, and Mainanduc is get ting as much in London. There is a fortune-teUer in Westminster who is making Uttle less. Lavater's Physiognomy-books seU at fifteen gui neas a set. The divining-rod is stiU considered as oracular in many places. Devils are cast out by seven ministers ; and, to complete the disgraceful catalogue, slavery is vindicated in print, and defended in the House of Peers." Memoirs, vol. U. p. 120. — E. 1788. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 307 TO THE RIGHT HON. LADY CRAVEN. Berkeley Square, Dec. 11, 1788. It is agreeable to your ladyship's usual goodness to honour me with another letter; and I may say, to your equity too, after I had proved to Monsieur Mercier, by the list of dates of my letters, that it was not mine, but the post's fault that you did not receive one that I had the honour of writing to you above a year ago. Not, Madam, that I could wonder if you had the prudence to drop a correspondence with an old superannuated man ; who, conscious of his decay, has had the decency of not troubhng with his dotages persons of not near your ladyship's youth and vivacity. I have long been of opinion that few persons know when to die; I am not so English as to mean when to dispatch themselves — no, but when to go out of the world. I have usually apphed this opinion to those who have made a considerable figure ; and, consequently, it was not adapted to myself Yet even we cyphers ought not to fatigue the public scene when we are be come lumber. Thus, being quite out of the question, I will explain my maxim, which is the more wholesome, the higher it is addressed. My opinion, then, is, that when any personage has shone as much as is possible in his or her best walk, (and, not to repeat both genders every minute, I will use the male as the common of the two,) he should take up his Strulbrug- ism, and be heard of no more. Instances will be still more explanatory. Voltaire ought to have pretended to die after Alzire, Mahomet, and Semiramis, and not have produced his wretched last pieces : Lord Chatham should have closed his political career with his imraortal war: and how weak was Garrick, when he had quitted the stage, to limp after the tatters of fame by writing and reading pitiful poeras ; and even by sitting to read plays which he had acted vrith such fire and energy ! We have another example in Mr. Anstey ; who, if he had a friend upon earth, would have been obliged to him for being knocked on the head, the moment he had published the flrst edition of the Bath Guide ; for, even in the second, X2 308 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1788. he had exhausted his whole stock of inspiration, and has never written anything tolerable since. When such unequal authors print their works together, one may apply in a new light the old hacked simUe of Mezentius, who tied together the living and the dead. We have just received the works of an author, from whom I find I am to receive much less entertainment than I ex pected, because I shall have much less to read than I in tended. His Memoirs, I am told, are almost wholly mihtary ; which, therefore, I shaU not read : and his poetry, I am sure, I shaU not look at, because I should not understand it What I saw of it formerly, convinced me that he would not have been a poet even if he had written in his own language; and, though I do not understand German, I am told it is a fine language : and I can easily believe that any tongue (not ex cepting our old barbarous Saxon, which, a bit of an antiquary as I am, I abhor,) is more harmonious than French. It was curious absurdity, therefore, to pitch on the most unpoetic language in Europe, the most barren, and the most clogged with difficulties. I have heard Russian and Polish sung, and both sounded musical; but to abandon one's own tongue, and not adopt Itahan, that is even sweeter, and softer, and more copious, than the Latin, was a want of taste that I should think could not be applauded even by a Frenchman born in Provence. But what a language is the French, which mea sures verses by feet that never are to be pronounced ; which is the case wherever the mute e is found ! What poverty of various sounds for rhyme, when, lest similar cadences should too often occur, their mechanic bards are obliged to marry masculine and feminine terminations as alternately as the black and white squares of a chess-board ? Nay, will you be lieve me. Madam, — yes, you will, for you may convince your own eyes, — that a scene of Zaire begins with three of the most nasal adverbs that ever snorted together in a breath? Enfin, done, desormais, are the culprits in question. En/in done, need I tell your ladyship, that the author I alluded to at the beginning of this long tirade is the late King of Prussia ? I am conscious that I have taken a little liberty when I 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 309 excomraunicate a tongue in which your ladyship has con descended to write;* but I only conderan it for verse and pieces of eloquence, of which I thought it alike incapable, till I read Rousseau of Geneva. It is a most sociable lan guage, and charming for narrative and epistles. Yet write as well as you will in it you must be liable to express yourself better in the speech natural to you ; and your own country has a right to understand all your works, and is jealous of their not being as perfect as you could make them. Is it not more creditable to be translated into a foreign language than into your own? and will it not vex you to hear the translation taken for the original, and to find vulgarisms that you could not have committed yourself ? But 1 have done, and will release you. Madam; only ob serving, that you flatter me with a vain hope, when you tell me you shall return to England some time or other. Where will that time be for me ? and when it arrives, shall I not be somewhere else? I do not pretend to send your ladyship English news, nor to tell you of English literature. You must before this time have heard of the dismal state into which our chief per sonage is fallen ! That consideration absorbs all others. The two Houses are going to settle some interraediate suc cedaneum ; and the obvious one, no doubt will be fixed on. TO THE MISS BERRYS.'' February 2, 17—71 ' [1789.] I AM sorry, in the sense of that word before it meant like a Hebrew word, glad or sorry, that I am engaged this even- ' Besides writing a comedy in French, caUed " Nourjahad," Lady Craven had translated into that language Gibber's play of " She would and She would not." — E. ' This is the first of the series of letters addressed by Mr. Walpole to Miss Mary and Miss Agnes Berry, and now first published from the ori ginals in their possession. See Advertisement prefixed to the pre sent volume. — ^E. ' The date is thus put, aUuding to his age, which, in 1789, was seventy-one. — M. B. 310 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. ing ; and I am at your command on Tuesday, as it is always my inclination to be. It is a misfortune that words are be come so much the current coin of society, that, like King Wilham's shillings, they have no impression left ; they are so smooth, that they mark no more to whom they first belonged than to whom they do belong, and are not worth even the twelvepence into which they raay be changed: but if they mean too little, they raay seem to mean too much too, espe cially when an old man (who is often synonymous for a miser) parts with them. I am afraid of protesting how much I de light in your society, lest I should seem to affect being gallant; but if two negatives make an affirmative, why raay not two ridicules corapose one piece of sense ? and therefore, as I am in love with you both, I trust it is a proof of the good sense of your devoted, H. Walpole. TO THE MISS BERRYS. Berkeley Square, March 20, 1789. Mrs. Damer had lent her Madarae de la Motte,* and I have but this moment recovered it ; so, you see, I had not for gotten it any more than my engagements to you : nay, were it not ridiculous at my age to use a term so almost run out as never, I would add, that you will find I never can forget you. I hope you are not engaged this day sevennight but will allow me to wait on you to Lady Ailesbury, which I wiU settle with her when I have your answer. I did mention it to her in general, but have no day free before Friday next, except Thursday ; when, if there is another iUumination, as is threat ened, we should neither get thither nor thence; especially not the latter, if the former is impracticable. " Quicquid delirant Reges, plectuntur Achivi." = P. S. I have got a few hairs of Edward the Fourth's head, not beard; they are of a darkish brown, not auburn. ' The M^moire Justificatif of Madame de la Motte, relative to her conduct in the far-famed aflair of the necklace. — E. ' Alluding to the pubUc rejoicings on the recovery of George the Third from his first iUness in 1788. In a letter to her sister, of the 9th 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 311 TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Berkeley Square, AprU 22, 1789. DEAR MADAM, As perhaps you have not yet seen the " Botanic Gar den" (which I believe I mentioned to you), I lend it you to read. The poetry, I think, you vrill allow most admirable; and difficult it was, no doubt If you are not a naturalist as well as a poetess, perhaps you will lament that so power ful a talent has been wasted to so little purpose ; for where is the use of describing in verse what nobody can under stand without a long prosaic explanation of every article? It is stUl raore unfortunate that there is not a symptom of plan in the whole poem. The lady-flowers and their lovers enter in pairs or trios, or &c. as often as the couples in Cassandra, and you are not a whit more interested about one heroine and her swain than about another. The similes are beautiful, fine, and sometimes sublime: and thus the episodes will be better remembered than the mass of the poem itself, which one cannot call the subject; for could one call it a sub ject, if anybody had composed a poem on the matches formerly raade in the Fleet where, as Waitwell says, in " The Way of the World," they stood like couples in rows ready to begin of March, Miss More relates the following particulars : — " A day or two ago I dined at the Bishop of London's with Dr. Willis. As we had nobody else at dinner but the Master of the Rolls, I was indulged in asking the Doctor all manner of impertinent questions. He never saw, he said, so much natural sweetness and goodness of mind, united to so much piety, as in the King. During his Ulness, he many times shed tears for Lord North's blindness. The Bishop had been to him that morn ing : he told him, that he wished to return his thanks to Almighty God in the most public manner, and hoped the Bishop would not refuse him a sermon. He proposed going to St. Paul's to do it. He himself has named one of the Psalms for the thanksgiving-day, and the twelfth of Isaiah for the lesson." On the 17th, she again writes — " The Queen and Princesses came to see the illuminations, and did not get back to Kew till after one o'clock. When the coach stopped, the Queen took notice of a fine gentleman who came to the coach-door without his hat. This was the King, who came to hand her out. She scolded him for being up and out so late ; but he gaUantly replied, ' he could not possibly go to bed and sleep tiU he knew she was safe.' There never was so joyous, so innocent, and so orderly a mob." Memoirs, vol. U. pp. 144-155.-^E. 312 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. a country-dance ? Still, I flatter rayself, you wiU agree with me that the author is a great poet, and could raise the pas sions, and possesses all the requisites of the art. I found but a single bad verse : in the last canto one line ends e'er long. You wiU perhaps be surprised at meeting a truffle converted into a nymph, and inhabiting a palace studded with emeralds and rubies hke a saloon in the Arabian Nights ! I had a more particular motive for sending this poem to you: you will find the bard espousing your poor Africans. There is besides, which wiU please you too, a handsome panegyric on the apostle of humanity, Mr. Howard.* Mrs. Garrick, whom I had the pleasure of raeeting in her own box at Mr. Conway's play, gave me a much better ac count of your health, which delighted me. I am sure, my good friend, you partake of my joy at the great success of his comedy. The additional character of the Abbe pleased much : it was added by the advice of the players to enliven it ; that is, to stretch the jaws of the pit and galleries. I sighed silently ; for it was originally so genteel and of a piece, that I was sorry to have it tumbled by coarse applauses. But this is a secret I am going to Twickenham for two days on an assignation with the spring, and to avoid the riotous devo tion of to-morrow. A gentleman essayist has printed what he calls sorae stric tures on my Royal and Noble Authors, in revenge for my having spoken irreverently (on Bishop Burnet's authority) of the Earl of Anglesey, who had the honour, it seems, of being the gentleman's grandfather. He asks me, by the ' " I did not feel," says Miss More, in her reply, " so much gratified in reading the poem, marveUous as I think it, as I did at the kindness which led you to think of me when you met with anything which you imagined would give me pleasure. Your strictures, which are as true as if they had no wit in them, served to embellish every page as I went on, and were more intelligible and delightful to me than the scientific an notations in the margin. The author is, indeed, a poet; and I wish, with you, that he had devoted his exuberant fancy, his opulence of imagery, and his correct and melodious versification, to subjects more congenial to human feelings than the intrigues of a flower-garden. I feel, Uke the most passionate lover, the beauty of the cyclamen, or honeysuckle; but am as indifl^erent as the most fashionable husband to their amours, their pleasures, or their unhappiness." Memoirs, vol. U. p. 149.— E. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. ' 313 way, why it was more ridiculous in the Duke of Newcastle to write his two comedies, than in the Duke of Buckingham to write " The Rehearsal " ? Alas ! I know but one reason ; which is, that it is less ridiculous to write one excellent coraedy, than two very bad ones. Peace be with such an swerers ! Adieu, ray dear Madara ! Yours most cordially. TO THE MISS BERRYS. AprU 28, at night, 1789. By my not saying no to Thursday, you, I trust, under stood that I meant yes ; and so I do. In the mean time, I send you the most delicious poem upon earth. If you don't know what it is all about, or why ; at least you will find glori ous sirailes about everything in the world, and I defy you to discover three bad verses in the whole stack. Dryden was but the prototype of tlie Botanic Garden in his charraing Flower and Leaf; and if he had less raeaning, it is true he had more plan: and I must own, that his white velvets and green velvets, and rubies and emeralds, were rauch more virtuous gentlefolks than most of the flowers of the creation, who seem to have no fear of Doctors' Commons before their eyes. This is only the Second Part ; for, like my king's eldest daughter in the Hieroglyphic Tales, the First Part is not born yet : — no matter. I can read this over and over again for ever ; for though it is so excellent it is impossible to remember any thing so disjointed, except you consider it as a collection of short enchanting poems, — as the Circe at her tremendous devilries in a church; the intrigue of the dear nightingale and rose ; and the description of Medea ; the episode of Mr. Howard, which ends with the most sublime of lines — in short, all, all; all is the most lovely poetry. And then one sighs, that such profusion of poetry, magnificent and tender, should be thrown away on what neither interests nor instructs, and, with all the pains the notes take to explain, is scarce intel- hgible.* ' " Modern ears," says Mr. Mathias, in the Pursuits of Literature " are absolutely debauched by such poetry as Dr. Darwin's, which marks 314 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. How strange it is, that a man should have been inspired with such enthusiasm of poetry by poring through a micro scope, and peeping through the key-holes of all the seraglios of aU the flowers in the universe ! I hope his discoveries may leave any impression but of the universal polygamy going on in the vegetable world, where, however, it is more gallant than amongst the human race ; for you will find that they are the botanic ladies who keep harams, and not the gentleraen. StiU, I will maintain that it is much better that we should have two wives than your sex two husbands. So pray don't mind Linnaeus and Dr. Darwin : Dr. Madan had ten times more sense. Adieu ! Your doubly constant, Telypthorus. TO THE MISS BERRYS. Strawberry HiU, Tuesday, June 23, 1789. I AM not a little disappointed and mortified at the post bringing me no letter from you to-day ; you promised to write on the road. I reckon you arrived at your station on Sunday evening : if you do not write till next day, I shall have no let ter till Thursday ! I am not at all consoled for my double loss : my only com fort is, that I flatter myself the journey and air will be of service to you both. The latter has been of use to rae, though the part of the element of air has been chiefly acted by the element of water, as my poor haycocks feel! Tonton* does not miss you so much as I do, not having so good a taste ; for he is grown very fond of me, and I return it for your sakes, though the decline of simplicity and true taste in this country. It is to Eng land what Seneca's prose was to Rome: abundat dulcibus vitiis. Dryden and Pope are the standards of excellence in this species of writing in our language ; and when young minds are rightly instituted in their works, they may, without much danger, read such glittering verses as Dr. Darwin's. They will then perceive the distortion of the sentiment, and the harlotry of the ornaments." To the short-lived po pularity of Dr. Darwin, the admirable poem of " The Loves of the Tri angles," the joint production of Mr. Canning and Mr. Frere, in no small degree contributed. — E. ' A dog of Miss Berry's, left in Walpole's care during their absence in Yorkshire.— M. B. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 315 he deserves it too, for he is perfectly good-natured and tract able ; but he is not beautiful, like his " god-dog," as Mr. Sel wyn, who dined here on Saturday, called my poor late favour ite;* especially as I have had him clipped. The shearing has brought to hght a nose an ell long ; and, as he has now nasum rhinocerotis, I do not doubt but he will be a better critic in poetry than Dr. Johnson, who judged of harmony by the prin ciples of an author, and fancied, or wished to raake others be heve, that no Jacobite could write bad verses, nor a Whig good. Have you shed a tear over the Opera-house ?2 or do you agree with rae, that there is no occasion to rebuild it? The nation has long been tired of operas, and has now a good op portunity of dropping thera. Dancing protracted their exist ence for some time ; but the room after was the real support of both, and was like what has been said of your sex, that they never speak their true meaning but in the postscript of their letters. Would not it be sufficient to build an after-room on the whole emplacement, to which people raight resort frora all assemblies? It should be a codicil to all the diversions of London; and the greater the concourse, the more excuse there would be for staying all night from the impossibility of ladies getting their coaches to drive up. To be crowded to death in a waiting-room, at the end of an entertainment, is the whole joy; for who goes to any diversion till the last minute of it ? I am persuaded that, instead of retrenching St Athanasius's Creed, as the Duke of Grafton proposed, in order to draw good company to church, it would be more effi cacious if the congregation were to be indulged with an After- room in the vestry ; and, instead of two or three being gathered together, there would be all the world, before the prayers would be quite over. * The dog which had been bequeathed to Mr. Walpole by Madame du Deffand at her death, and which was likewise called Tonton. See antd, p. 120.— M.B. " On the night of the 17th, the Opera-house was entirely consumed by fire.— E. 316 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. Thursday night. " Despairing, beside a clear stream A shepherd forsaken was laid ; " — not very close to the stream, but within doors in sight of it ; for in this damp weather a lame old Colin cannot lie and despair with any comfort on a wet bank : but I smile against the grain, and am seriously alarmed at Thursday being come, and no letter I I dread one of you being ill. Mr. Batt* and the Abbe Nicholls^ dined with me to-day, and I could talk of you en pais de connoissance. They tried to persuade me that 1 have no cause to be in a fright about you ; but I have such perfect faith in the kindness of both of you, as I have in your possessing every other virtue, that I cannot believe but some sinister accident must have prevented my hearing from you. I wish Friday was come ! I cannot write about anything else till I have a letter. TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Strawberry Hill, June 23, 1789. MADAM HANNAH, You are an errant reprobate, and grow wickeder and wickeder every day. You deserve to be treated like a negre ; and your favourite Sunday, to which you are so partial that you treat the other poor six days of the week as if they had no souls to be saved, should, if I could have my wUl, " shine ' Thomas Batt, Esq. then one of the commissioners for public ac counts. — E. = The Rev. Norton NichoUs, rector of Lound and BradweU, in the county of Suffolk ; one of the most elegant scholars and accompUshed gentlemen of the day. He died in November 1809, in his sixty-eighth year. " It was his singular good fortune," says Mr. Dawson Turner, " to have been distinguished in his early life by the friendship of Gray the poet ; while the close of his days was cheered and enlivened and dignified by the friendship, and almost constant society, of a man scarcely inferior to Gray in talent and acquirements, Mr. Mathias; who has embalmed his memory in an Italian Ode and a biographical memoir ; which latter is a beautiful specimen of that kind of composition." They wUl both be found in the fifth volume of Nichols's Illustrations of Lite rature. — E. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 317 no Sabbath-day for you.'' Now, don't simper, and look as innocent as if virtue would not melt in your mouth. Can you deny the foUowing charges ? — I lent you « The Botanic Garden," and you returned it without writing a syllable, or saying where you were or whither you was going ; I suppose for fear I should know how to direct to you. Why, if I did send a letter after you, could not you keep it three months without an answer, as you did last year ? In the next place, you and your nine accomplices, who, by the way, are too good in keeping you company, have clubbed the prettiest poem imaginable,* and communicated it to Mrs. Boscawen, with injunctions not to give a copy of it ; I suppose, because you are ashamed of having written a panegyric. Whenever you do compose a satire, you are ready enough to publish it; at least, whenever you do, you will din one to death with it. But now, mind your perverse ness: that very pretty novel poem, and I must own it is charming, have you gone and spoiled, flying in the faces of your best friends the Muses, and keeping no measures with them. I '11 be shot if they dictated two of the best lines with two syllables too much in each — nay, you have weakened one of thera, " Ev'n Gardiner's mind " is far more expressive than steadfast Gardiner's; and, as Mrs. Boscawen says, whoever knows anything of Gardiner, could not want that superfluous epithet; and whoever does not, would not be the wiser for your foolish insertion — Mrs. BoscaVen did not call it foolish, but I do. The second line, as Mesdemoiselles the Muses handed it to you. Miss, was, ¦ " Bishop Bonner's Ghost j " to which was prefixed the following argument : — " In the garden of the palace at Fulham is a dark recess ; at the end of this stands a chair which once belonged to Bishop Bonner. A certain Bishop of London, more than two hundred years after the death of the aforesaid Bonner, just as the clock of the Gothic chapel had struck six, undertook, to cut with his own hand a narrow walk through this thicket, which is since called ' The Monk's Walk.' He had no sooner begun to clear the way, than Io ! suddenly up started from the chair the Ghost of Bonner; who, in a tone of just and bitter indigna tion, uttered the foUowing verses." — E. 318 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. " Have all be free and saved — " not, " AU be free and all be saved :" the second all be is a most unnecessary tautology. The poem was perfect and faultless, if you could have let it alone. I wonder how your mischievous flippancy could help maiming that raost new and beautiful expression, "sponge of sins;" I should not have been surprised, as you love verses too full of feet, if you had changed it to " that scrubbing-brush of sins." Well ! I will say no more now : but if you do not order me a copy of "Bonner's Ghost" incontinently, never dare to look my printing-house in the face again. Or come, I '11 tell you what ; I will forgive all your enormities, if you will let me print your poem. I like to filch a little imraortahty out of others, and the Strawberry press could never have a better opportunity. I will not haggle for the public; I will be content with printing only two hundred copies, of which you shall have half, and I half. It shall cost you nothing but a yes. I only propose this, in case you do not mean to print it yourself Tell me sincerely which you like. But as to not printing it at all, charming and unexceptionable as it is, you cannot be so preposterous.* I by no means have a thought of detracting from your own share in your own poem; but, as I do suspect that it caught some inspiration from your perusal of " "The Botanic Garden," so I hope you will discover that my style is much improved by having lately studied Bruce's travels. There I dipped, and not in St. Giles's pound, where one would think this author had been educated. Adieu ! Your friend, or mortal foe, as you behave on the present occasion. ' Miss More, in her reply, says—" I send this under cover to the Bi shop of London, to whom I write your emendations, and desire they may be considered as the true reading. What is odd enough, I did write both the lines so at first, but must go a-tinkering them afterwards. I do not pretend that I am not flattered by your obliging proposal of printing these slight verses at the Strawberry press. You must do as you please, I believe. What business have I to think meanly of verses you have commended.'" Memoirs, vol. ii. p. 159. — E. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 319 TO MISS BERRY. Strawberry HiU, June 30, 1789. Were there any such thing as sympathy at. the distance of two hundred miles, you would have been in a mightier panic than I was ; for, on Saturday se'nnight, going to open the glass case in the Tribune, my foot caught in the carpet and I fell with my whole weight {si weight y a) against the corner of the marble altar, on my side, and bruised the muscles so badly, that for two days I could not move with out screaming.* I am convinced I should have broken a rib, but that I fell on the cavity whence two of my ribs were reraoved, that are gone to Yorkshire. I am much better both of my bruise and of my lameness, and shall be ready to dance at my own wedding when ray wives return. And now to answer your letter. If you grow tired of the Arabian Nights, you have no raore taste than Bishop Atterbury,'' who huffed Pope for sending him them or the Persian Tales, and fancied he liked Virgil better, who had no more imagination than Dr. Akenside. Read Sinbad the Sailor's Voyages, and you will be sick of jiEneas's. What woful invention were the nasty poultry that dunged on his dinner, and ships on fire turned into Nereids ! ' Miss More, in a letter written at this time to Walpole says, " How you do scold me ! but I don't care for your scolding ; and I don't care for your wit neither, that I don't, half as much as I care for a blow which I hear you have given yourself against a table. I have known such very serious consequences arise from such accidents, that I beg of you to drown yourself in the "Veritable Arquebusade." Memoirs, vol. U. p. 158.— E. " The foUowing are the Bishop's expressions : — " And now. Sir, for your Arabian Tales. IU as I have been, almost ever since they came to hand, I have read as much of them as ever I shaU read while I live. Indeed, they do not please my taste ; they are writ with so romantic an air, and are of so wild and absurd a contrivance, that I have not only no pleasure, but no patience in reading them. I cannot help thinking them the production of some woman's imagination." The Honourable Charles Yorke, in a letter to his brother, the second Earl of Hardwicke, written in June 1740, states that Pope and Warburton both agreed in condemning the Bishop's judgment on the Arabian Tales, and that Warburton added, that from those tales the completest notion might be gathered of the Eastern ceremonies and manners. — E. 320 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. a barn metamorphosed into a cascade in a pantomime is full as sublime an effort of genius. I do not know whether the Arabian Nights are of Oriental origin or not:* I should think not because I never saw any otber Oriental composition that was not bombast without genius, and figurative without na ture; like an Indian screen, where you see little men on the foreground, and larger men hunting tigers above in the air, which they take for perspective. I do not think the Sul- taness's narratives very natural or very probable, but there is a wildness in them that captivates. However, if you could wade through two octavos^ of Dame Piozzi's though's and so's and / trow's, and cannot listen to seven volumes of Schehere- zade's narrations, I wUl sue for a divorce in foro Parnassi, and Boccalini shall be my proctor. The cause will be a counterpart to the sentence of the Lacedaeraonian, who was condemned for breach of the peace, by saying in three words what he might have said in two. You are not the first Eurydice that has sent her husband to the devil, as you have kindly proposed to me ; but I will not undertake the jaunt for if old Nicholas Pluto should enjoin me not to look back to you, I should certainly forget the prohibition like my predecessor. Besides, I am a little too close to take a voyage twice which I ara so soon to re peat; and should be laughed at by the good folks on the other side of the water, if I proposed coming back for a twinkling only. No ; I choose as long as I can " StiU with my fav'rite Berrys to remain." ' So, you was not quite satisfied, though you ought to have been transported, with King's College Chapel, because it has ' The work entitled " MiUe et Une Nuits," was translated from an original Arabic manuscript, in the King of France's library, by M. Gal- land, professor of Arabic in the University of Paris. It aooeared in 1704-8, in twelve volumes.— E. ^^ " Her " Observations and Reflections made in the course of a Journey through France, Italy, and Germany," honoured with a couplet in the Baviad — " See Thrale's grey widow with a satchel roam. And bring in pomp laborious nothings home." E. ' A line from some verses that he had received. — M. B. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 321 no aisles, like every common cathedral. I suppose you would object to a bird of paradise, because it has no legs, but shoots to heaven in a trait, and does not rest on earth. Cri ticism and comparison spoil many tastes. You should ad mire all bold and unique essays that resemble nothing else ; the Botanic Garden, the Arabian Nights, and King's Chapel are above all rules : and how preferable is what no one can imitate, to all that is imitated even from the best models ! Your partiality to the pageantry of popery I do approve, and I doubt whether the world will not be a loser (in its visionary enjoyments) by the extinction of that religion, as it was by the decay of chivalry and the proscription of the heathen deities. Reason has no invention; and as plain sense will never be the legislator of huraan affairs, it is fortunate when taste happens to be regent. TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Strawberry HiU, July 2, 1789. I ALMOST think I shall never abuse you again; nay, I would not, did not it prove so extremely good for you. No walnut-tree is better for being threshed than you are; and, though you have won my heart by your compliance, I don't know whether my conscience will not insist on ray using you ill now and then ; for is there any precedent for gratitude not giving way to every other duty? Gratitude, hke an earl's eldest son, is but titular, and has no place upon trials. But I fear I ara punning sillily, instead of thanking you seriously, as I do, for allowing me to print your lovely verses. My press can confer no honour; but, when I offer it, it is a certain mark of my sincerity and esteem. It has been dedicated to friendship, to charity — too often to worth less self-love ; sometimes to the rarity of the pieces, and sorae times to the raerit of them ; now it will unite the first motive and the last. My fall, for which you so kindly concern yourself, was not worth mentioning ; for as I only bruised the muscles of my VOL. VI. Y 322 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. side, instead of breaking a rib, camphire infused in arque busade took off the pain and all consequences in five or six days: and one has no right to draw on the compassion of others for what one has suffered and is past Some love to be pitied on that score ; but forget that they only excite, in the best-natured, joy on their deliverance. You commend me too for not complaining of my chronical evil; but ™y dear Madam, I should be blameable for the reverse. If I would live to seventy-two, ought I not to compound for the encum brances of old age? And who has fewer? And who has more cause to be thankful to Providence for his lot? The gout, it is true, comes frequently, but the fits are short, and very tolerable; the intervals are full health. My eyes are perfect my hearing but little impaired, chiefly to whispers, for which I certainly have little occasion : my spirits never fail ; and though my hands and feet are crippled, I can use both, and do not wish to box, wrestle, or dance a hornpipe. In short I am just infirm enough to enjoy all the preroga tives of old age, and to plead them against anything that I have not a mind to do. Young raen must conform to every folly in fashion : drink when they had rather be sober ; fight a duel if somebody else is wrong-headed; marry to please their fathers, not theraselves ; and shiver in a white waistcoat, because ancient almanacks, copying the Arabian, placed the month of June after May ; though, when the style was re formed, it ought to have been intercalated between December and January. Indeed, I have been so childish as to cut my hay for the same reason, and am now weeping over it by the fireside. But to come to business. You must suffer me to print two hundred copies ; and if you approve it I will send thirty to the Bishop of London out of your quota- You may afterwards give him more, if you please. I do not propose putting your name, unless you desir6 it; as I think it would swear with the air of ancientry you have adopted in the signature and notes. The authoress will be no secret; and as it will certainly get into magazines, why should not you deal privately beforehand with some book seller, and have a second edition ready to appear soon after mine is finished ? The difficulty of getting my edition at first 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 323 frora the paucity of the nuraber and frora being only given as presents, will make the second edition eagerly sought for ; and I do not see why my anticipating the publication should deprive you of the profit. Rather than do that I would print a smaller nuraber. I wish to raise an additional ap petite to that which everybody has for your writings; I am sure I did not mean to injure you. Pray think of this ; there is time enough ; I cannot begin to print under a week : my press has lain fallow for some time, and ray printer must prepare ink, balls, &c. ; and as I have but one man, he cannot be expeditious. I seriously do advise you to have a second edition ready: why should covetous booksellers run away with all the advantages of your genius ? They get enough by their ample share of the sale. I will say no raore, but to repeat my thanks for your con sent, which truly obliges me ; and I am happy to have been the instrument of preserving what your modesty would have sunk. My esteem could not increase : but one likes to be connected by favours to those one highly values. TO MISS BERRY. Strawberry HUl, July 9, 1789. You are so good and punctual, that I will complain no more of your silence, unless you are silent You must not relax, especially until you can give me better accounts of your health and spirits. I was peevish before with the weather ; but, now it prevents your riding, I forget hay and roses, and all the comforts that are washed away, and shall only watch the weather-cock for an east wind in Yorkshire. What a shame that I should recover from the gout and from bruises, as 1 assure you I am entirely, and that you should have a complaint left ! One would think that it was I was grown young again ; for just now, as I was reading your letter in my bedchamber, while some of my customers'^ are see ing the house, I heard a gentleman in the armoury ask the * The name given by Mr. Walpole to parties coming to view his house. — M. B. y 2 324 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. housekeeper as he looked at tbe bows and arrows, " Pray, does Mr. Walpole shoot?" No, nor with pistols neither. I leave aU weapons to Lady Salisbury* and Mr. Lenox ;'^ and, since my double marriage, have suspended my quiver in the Temple of Hymen. Hygeia shall be my goddess, if she will send you back blooming to this region. I wish I had preserved any correspondence in France, as you are curious about their present history ; which 1 believe very momentous indeed. What httle I have accidentally heard, I will relate, and will learn what more I can. On the King's being advised to put out his talons, Necker desired leave to resign, as not having been consulted, and as the mea sure violated his plan. The people, hearing his intention, thronged to Versailles ; and he was forced to assure them from a balcony, that he was not to retire. I am not accurate in dates, nor warrant my intelhgence, and therefore pretend only to send you detached scraps. Force being still in re quest, the Due du Chatelet acquainted the King that he could not answer for the French guards. Chatelet, who, from his hot arrogant temper, I should have thought would have been one of the proudest opposers of the people, is sus pected to lean to them. In short Marshal Broglio is ap pointed commander-in-chief, and is said to have sworn on his sword, that he will not sheathe it till he has plunged it into the heart of ce gros banquier Genevois. I cannot reconcile this with Necker's stay at VersaiUes. That he is playing a deep game is certain. It is reported that Madame Necker tastes previously everything he swallows.' A vast camp is ' Lady Mary-Amelia, daughter of Wills, first Marquis of Downshire ; married, in 1773, to James seventh Earl of Salisbury, advanced in August 1789, to the title of Marquis. Her ladyship was a warm' pa troness of the art of archery and a first-rate equestrian. In Novem ber 1835, at the age of eighty-four, she was burnt to death at Hatfield- house. — E. ' In consequence of a dispute, concerning words said to have been spoken at Daubigny's club, a duel took place at Wimbledon, on the 26th of May, between the Duke of York and Colonel Lenox, afterwards Duke of Richmond. Neither of the parties was wounded ; and the seconds, Lords Rawdon and Winchilsea, certified, that both behaved with the utmost coolness and intrepidity. — E. = On the llth of July, two days after the date of this letter, Necker 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 325 forming round Paris ; but the army is mutinous — the tragedy may begin on the other side. They do talk of an engage ment at Metz, where the French troops, espousing the po pular cause, were attacked by two German regiments, whom the former cut to pieces. The Duke and Duchess of Devon shire, who were at Paris, have thought it prudent to leave it ; and my cousin, Mr. Thomas Walpole, who is near it has just written to his daughters, that he is glad to be out of the town, that he may make his retreat easily. Thus, you see the crisis is advanced far beyond orations, and wears all the aspect of civU war. For can one imagine that the whole nation is converted at once, and in some measure without provocation from the King, who, far from enforcing the prerogative like Charles the First, cancelled the despotism obtained for his grandfather by the Chancellor Mau- peou, has exercised no tyranny, and has shown a disposition to let the constitution be amended. It did want it indeed; but I fear the present want of temper grasps at so rauch, that they defeat their own purposes ; and where loyalty has for ages been the predominant characteristic of a nation, it cannot be eradicated at once. Pity will soften the tone of the moment; and the nobility and clergy have raore interest in wearing a royal than a popular yoke ; for great lords and high-priests think the rights of mankind a defalcation of their privileges. No man living is more devoted to hberty than I am ; yet blood is a terrible price to pay for it ! A martyr to liberty is the noblest of characters ; but to sacrifice the lives of others, though for the benefit of all, is a strain of heroism that I could never ambition. I have just been reading Voltaire's Correspondence, — one of those heroes who liked better to excite martyrs, than to be one. How vain would he be, if alive now I I was struck with one of his letters to La Chalotais, who was a true up- received his dismission and a formal demand to quit the kingdom. It was accompanied by a note from the King, praying him to depart in a private manner, for fear of exciting disturbances. Necker received this intimation just as he was dressing for dinner; after which, without di vulging his intention to any one, he set out in the evening, with Ma dame Necker, for Basle. See Mignet, tom. i. p. 47. — E. 326 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. right patriot and martyr too. In the 221st Letter of the sixth volume, Voltaire says to him, " Vous avez jette des germes qui produiront un jour plus qu'on ne pense." It was lucky for me that you inquired about France ; I had not a halfpenny-worth more of news in my wallet. A person who was very apt to call on you every morning for a minute, and stay three hours, was with me the other day, and his grievance from the rain was the swarms of gnats. I said, I supposed I have very bad blood, for gnats never bite me. He replied, " I believe I have bad blood too, for dull people, who would tire me to death, never come near me." Shall I beg a pallet-full of that repellent for you, to set in your window as barbers do ? I believe you will make me grow a little of a newsraonger, though you are none ; but I know that at a distance, in the country, letters of news are a regale. I am not wont to listen to the batteries on each side of me at Hampton-court and Richmond ; but in your absence I shall turn a less deaf ear to them, in hopes of gleaning something that may amuse you : though I shall leave their manufactures of scandal for their own home consumption ; you happUy do not deal in such wares. Adieu ! I used to think the month of Sep tember the dullest of the whole set ; now I shall be impatient for it. TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Strawberry HiU, July 10, 1789. Though I am touchy enough vrith those I love, I did not think you dilatory, nor expect that answers to letters should be as quick as repartees. I do pity you for the acci dent that made you think yourself remiss.* I enjoy your pa- ' " You wiU think me a great brute and savage, dear Sir, for not having directly thanked you for your letter, tiU you have read my pUce justificative, and then you wiU think I should have been a greater brute and savage if I had ; for the very day I received it, a very amiable neighbour, coming to caU on us, was overturned from her phaeton into some water, her husband driving her. The poor lady was brought into our house, to all appearance dying. I thank God, however, she is now 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 327 tient's recovery; but almost smiled unawares at the idea of her being sopped, and coming out of the water brustling up her feathers and ermines, and assuraing the dignity of a Jupiter Pluvius. I beseech you not to fancy yourself vain on my being your printer: would Sappho be proud, though Aldus or Elzevir were her typographer ? My press has no rank but from its narrowness, that is, from the paucity of its editions, and from being a volunteer. But a truce to compliments, and to reci procal humility. Pray tell me how I shall convey your parcel to you : the impression is begun. I shall not dare, vu le svjet, to send a copy to Mrs. Garrick ; * I do not know whether you will venture. Mrs. Boscawen shall have one, but it shall be in your name : so authorize me to present it, that neither of us may tell the whitest of fibs. Shall I deliver any others for you within my reach, to save you trouble ? I have no raore corrections to raake. I told you brutally at first of the only two faults I found, and you sacrificed them with the patience of a martyr ; for I conclude that when a good poet knowingly sins against measure twice, he is per suaded that he makes amends by greater beauties : in such case docility deserves the palm-branch. I do not applaud your declining a London edition ; but you have been so tract able, that I will let you have your way in this, though you only make over profit to magazines. Being an honest printer myself, I have little charity for those banditti of my profession who pUfer from everybody they find on the road. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry HiU, Wednesday night. [July IS, 1789.] I WRITE a few lines only to confirm the truth of rauch of what you will read in the papers from Paris. Worse may already be come, or is expected every hour. out of danger; but our attendance, day and night, on the maimed lady and the distressed husband banished poetry from my thoughts, and sus pended all power of writing nonsense." Miss More to Walpole. Me moirs, vol. ii. p. 160. — E. ' Mrs. Garrick was a Roman Catholic. — E. 328 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. Mr. Mackenzie and Lady Betty called on me before dinner, after the post was gone out; and he showed me a letter from Dutens, who said two couriers arrived yesterday from the Duke of Dorset and the Duchess of Devonshire, the latter of whom was leaving Paris directly. Necker had been dismissed, and was thought to be set out for Geneva. Breteuil, who was at his country-house, had been sent for to succeed hira. Paris was in an uproar ; and, after the couriers had left it, firing of cannon was heard for four hours together. That must have been from the BastiUe,* as probably the tiers etat were not so provided. It is shocking to imagine what may have happened in such a thronged city ! One of the couriers was stopped twice or thrice, as supposed to pass from the King ; but re deemed himself by pretending to be dispatched by the tiers etat. Madame de Calonne told Dutens, that the newly en camped troops desert by hundreds. Here seems the egg to be hatched, and imagination runs away with the idea. I may fancy I shall hear of the King and Queen leaving Versailles, like Charles the First ^^^ then skips imagination six-and-forty years lower, and figures their fugitive majesties taking refuge in this country. I have be sides another idea. If the Bastille conquers, still is it irapos sible, considering the general spirit in the country, and the numerous fortified places in France, but some may be seized by the dissidents, and whole provinces be torn from the crown ? On the other hand, if the King prevails, what heavy despot ism will the etats, by their want of temper and moderation, have drawn on their country ! They might have obtained many capital points, and removed great oppression. No French monarch wUl ever summon etats again, if this moraent has been thrown away. Though I have stocked myself with such a set of visions for the event either way, I do not pretend to foresee what will happen. Penetration argues from reasonable probabihties ; but chance and folly are apt to contradict calculation, and ' For an interesting account of the storming and destruction of the Bastille, on the 14th of July, see Mr. Shoberl's valuable translation of M. Thiers's " Histoiy of the French Revolution," vol. i. p. 59. — E. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 329 hitherto they seem to have full scope for action. One hears of no genius on either side, nor do symptoms of any appear. There will perhaps : such times and tempests bring forth, at least bring out, great men. I do not take the Duke of Or leans or Mirabeau to be built du bois dont on les fait ; no, nor Monsieur Necker.* He may be a great traitor, if he made the confusion designedly : but it is a woful evasion, if the promised financier slips into a black politician ! I adore liberty, but I would bestow it as honestly as I could ; and a civil war, be sides being a game of chance, is paying a very dear price for it For us, we are in most danger of a deluge ; though I won der we so frequently complain of long rains. The saying about St Swithin is a proof of how often they recur ; for pro verbial sentences are the children of experience, not of pro phecy. Good night ! In a few days I shall send you a beau tiful little poem from the Strawberry press. TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Strawberry HiU, Monday night, July 20, 1789. MY EXCELLENT FRIEND, I NEVER shall be angry with your conscientiousness, though I will not promise never to scold it, as you know I think you sometimes carry it too far ; and how pleasant to have a friend to scold on such grounds ! I see all your delicacy in what you call your double treachery, and your kind desire of connecting two of your friends.'* The seeds are sprung up ' " It was in vain," says Sir Walter Scott, " that the Marquis de BouUle pointed out the dangers arising from the constitution assigned to the States General, and insisted that the minister was arming the popular part of the nation against the two privUeged orders, and that the latter would soon experience the e£Fects of their hatred. Necker calmly re plied, that there was a necessary reliance to be placed on the virtues of the human heart — the maxim of a worthy man, but not of an enlight ened statesman, who has but too much reason to know how often both the virtues and the prudence of human nature are surmounted by its prejudices and passions." Life of Napoleon Buonaparte, vol. i. p. 107 ed. 1834.— E. = With the view of making Bishop Porteus and Walpole better known 330 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. already ; and the Bishop has already condescended to make me the first and indeed so unexpected a visit that, had I in the least surmised it I should certainly, as became me, have prevented him. One effect however, I can tell you your pimping between us will have : his lordship has, to please your partiahty, flattered me so agreeably in the letter you betrayed, that I shall never write to you again without the dread of attempting the wit he is so liberal as to bestow on me ; and then either way I must be dull or affected, though I hope to have the grace to prefer the former, and then you only will be the sufferer, as we both should by the latter. But I will come to facts : they are plain bodies, can have nothing to do with wit, and yet are not dull to those who have anything to do with them. According to your order, I have delivered Ghosts'^ to Mrs. Boscawen, Mrs. Garrick, Lady Juliana Penn, Mrs. Walsing ham, and Mr. Pepys. Mr. Batt I am told, leaves London to-day ; so I shall reserve his to his return. This morning I carried his thirty to the Bishop of London, who said modestly, he should not have expected above ten. I was delighted with the palace, with the venerable chapel, and its painted episco- palities in glass, and the brave hall, &c. &c. Though it rained, I would crawl to Bonner's chair. In short, my satis faction would have been complete, but for wanting the pre sence of that jesuitess, " the good old papist." To-morrow departs for London, to be dehvered to the Bristol coach at the White-horse-cellar in PiccadUy, a parcel containing sixty-four Ghosts, one of which is printed on brown for your own eating. There is but one more such, so you may preserve it like a relic. I know these two are not so good as the white : but, as rarities, a collector would give ten times more for them ; and uniquity will make them valued more to each other, Miss More had committed what she called a double treachery, in showing to the Bishop a letter she had received from Wal pole, and to Walpole one sent her by the Bishop. — E. ' Though the author of this poem must have been known to so many individuals in the year 1789, the secret was so weU kept, that it was actually printed in the Gentleman's Magazine for February 1804 as the production of Walpole. — ^E. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 331 than the charming poetry. I believe, if there was but one ugly woman in the world, she would occasion a longer war than Helen did. You will find the Bishop's letter in the par cel. I did not breathe a hint of my having seen it as I could not conjure up into my pale cheeks the blush I ought to exhibit on such flattery. I pity you most sincerely for your almost drowned guest Fortune seems to delight in throwing poor Louisas in your way, that you may exercise your unbounded charity and bene volence. Adieu I pray write. I need not virite to you to pray ; but I wish, when your knees have what the common people call a worky-day, you would employ your hands the whole time. Yours most cordially. P. S. I believe I have blundered, and that your knees would call a week-day a hohday. TO MISS BERRY. Strawberry HiU, July 29, 1789. I HAVE received two dear letters from you of the 18th and 25th ; and though you do not accuse me, but say a thou sand kind things to rae in the most agreeable raanner, I allow my ancientry, and that I am an old, jealous, and peevish husband, and quarrel with you if I do not receive a letter exactly at the moraent I please to expect one. You talk of raine ; but, if you knew how I hke yours, you would not wonder that I am impatient, and even unreasonable in my demands. However, though I own my faults, I do not mean to correct them. I have such pleasure in your letters (I am sorry I am here forced to speak in the singular number, which by the way is an Irishism,) that I will be cross if you do not write to me perpetuaUy. The quintessence of your last but one was, in telling rae you are better : how fervently do I wish to receive such accounts every post. But who can raend but old I, in such detestable weather ? — not one hot day ; and, if a morning shines, the evening closes with a heavy shower. 332 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. Of French news I can give you no fresher or more authen tic account than you can collect in general from tbe news papers ; but my present visitants and everybody else confirm the veracity of Paris being in that anarchy that speaks the populace domineering in the most cruel and savage raanner, and which a servile multitude broken loose calls liberty ; and which in all probability will end, when their Massaniello-like reign is over, in their being more abject slaves than ever ; and chiefly by the crime of their Etats, who, had they acted with temper and prudence, might have obtained from their poor and undesigning King a good and permanent constitution. Who may prove their tyrant if reviving loyalty does not in a new phrenzy force him to be so, it is impossible to foresee ; but much may happen first. The rage seems to gain tbe pro vinces, and threatens to exhibit the horrors of those times when the peasants massacred the gentleraen. Thus you see I can only conjecture, which is not sending you news ; and my intelligence reaches me by so many rebounds, that you must not depend on any thing I can tell you. I repeat, be cause I hear ; but draw on you for no credit. Having experi enced last winter, in superaddition to a long life of experience, that in Berkeley Square I could not trust to a single report from Kew, can I swallow implicitly at Twickenham the dis torted information that comes from Paris through the me dium of London ? You asked me in one of your letters who La Chalotais was. I answer, premier president or avocat^general, I forget which, of the Parliament of Bretagne ; a great, able, honest, and most virtuous man, who opposed the Jesuits and the tyranny of the Due d'Aiguillon ; but he was as indiscreet as he was good. Calonne was his friend and confident ; to whom the imprudent patriot trusted, by letter, his farther plan of opposition and designs. The wretch pretended to have busi ness with, or to be sent for by, the Due de la Vrilliere, secre tary of state ; a courtier- wretch, whose mistress used to sell lettres de cachet for a louis.* Calonne was left to wait in the ' The Due de la VriUiere was dismissed in 1775, and succeeded by M. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 333 antechamber ; but being, as he said, suddenly called in to the minister, as he was reading (a most natural soil for such a lec ture) the letter of his friend, he by a second natural inadvert ence left the fatal letter on tbe chimney-piece. The conse quence, much more natural, was, that La Chalotais was com raitted to the Chateau du Taureau, a horrible dungeon on a rock in the sea, with his son, whose legs mortified there, and the father was doomed to the scaffold ; but the Due de Choi seul sent a counter reprieve by an express and a cross-road, and saved him.* At the beginning of this reign he was re stored. Paris, however, was so indignant at the treachery, that this Calonne was hissed out of the theatre, when I was in that capital.^ When I heard, some years after, that a Calonne was made controUeur-general, I concluded it must be a son, not conceiving that so reprobated a character could emerge to such a height ; but asking my sister, who has been in France since I was, she assured me it was not only the identical being, but that when she was at Metz, where I think he was intend ant, the officers in garrison would not dine with him. When he fled hither for an asylum, I did not talk of his story till I saw it in one of the pamphlets that were written against him in France, and that came over hither. Friday night, 31st. My company prevented ray finishing this : part left me at noon, the residue are to come to-morrow. To-day I have dined at Fulham ' along with Mrs. Boscawen ; but St Swithin de Malesherbes. Madame du Defland's letter to Walpole of June 26, 1774, contains the following epigram on him : — " Ministre sans talent ainsi que sans vertu. Convert d'ignominie autant qu'on le pent etre, Retire-toi done ! Qu'attends-tu } Qu'on te jette par la fenetre ? " — E. ' La Chalotais died in July 1785. Among other works, he wrote an " Essay on National Education," which was reprinted in 1825. His son perished by the guillotine in January 1794. — E. ' " An intrigue brought M. de Calonne forward, who was not in good odour with the public, because he had contributed to the persecution of La Chalotais." Thiers, vol. i. p. 5. — E. ' With Bishop Porteus. " I fear," writes Hannah More, on hearing of this dinner, " I shall secretly triumph in the success of my fraud, if has contributed to bring about any intercourse between the Abbey of Fulhimi and the Castle of Otranto. It sounds so ancient and so feudal! 334 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. played the devil so, that we could not stir out of doors, and had fires to chase the watery spirits. Quin, being once asked if be had ever seen so bad a winter, replied, " Yes, just such an one last summer ! " — and here is its youngest brother I Mrs. Boscawen saw a letter from Paris to Miss Sayer this morning, which says Necker's son-in-law was arrived, and had announced his father-in-law's promise of return from Basle. I do not know whether his honour or ambition prompt this compliance; surely not his discretion. I ara much acquainted with him, and do not hold hira great and profound enough to quell the present anarchy. If he attempts to moderate for the King, I shall not be surprised if he falls another victira to tumultuary jealousy and outrage.* All accounts agree in the violence of the mob against the inoffensive as well as against the objects of their resentment ; and in the provinces, where even women are not safe in their houses. The hotel of the Due de Chatelet, lately built and superb, has been assaulted, and the furniture sold by auction ; ^ but a most shocking act of a royalist in Burgundy, who is said to have blown up a committee of forty persons, will probably spread the fiames of civil rage much wider. When I read the account I did not believe it ; but the Bishop of London says, he hears the Etats But among the things which pleased you in the episcopal domain, I hope the lady of it has that good fortune ; she is quite a model of a pleasant wife. Now, I am acquainted with a great many very good wives, who are so notable and so manageable, that they make a man everything but happy ; and I know a great many others who sing, and play, and paint, and cut paper, and are so accomplished, that they have no time to be agreeable, and no desire to be useful." Memoirs, vol. ii. p. 165. — E. ' On the 16th of July, five days after the dismissal of M. Necker, the National Assembly obtained his recal. His return from Basle to Paris was one continued triumph. During the next twelve months, he was constantly presenting new financial statements ; but he soon perceived that his influence was daUy diminishing : at length the famous Red Book appeared, and completely put an end to his popularity. In September 1790, his resignation was accepted : as he was quitting the kingdom, his carriage was stopped by the same populace which had so recently drawn him into Paris in triumph ; and it was necessary to apply to the As sembly for an order, directing that he should be allowed to proceed to Switzerland. He obtained this permission, and retired to Coppet " there," says M. Thiers, " to contemplate at a distance, a revolution which he was no longer quaUfied to observe closely or to guide." E. ^ The Duke, who was colonel of the King's guard, narrowly escaped assassination. — E. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 335 have required the King to write to every foreign power not to harbour the execrable author, who is fied.* I fear this conflagration will not end as rapidly as that in Holland ! TO JOHN PINKERTON, ESQ.^ Strawberry Hill, July 31, 1789. Having had my house full of relations till this evening, I could not answer the favour of your letter sooner ; and now I am ashamed of not being able to tell you that I have finished reading your " Essay on the Ancient History of Scotland." I am so totally unversed in the story of original nations, and I own always find myself so little interested in savage manners unassisted by individual characters, that, though you lead me with a firmer hand than any historian through the dark tracts, the clouds close round rae the moment I have passed them, and I retain no meraory of the ground I have trod. I greatly admire your penetration, and read with wonder your clear dis covery of the kingdom of Strathclyde ; but though I bow to you, as I would to the founder of an empire, I confess I do not care a straw about your subjects, with whom I am no more acquainted than with the ancient inhabitants of Otaheite. Your origin of the Piks is most able ; but then I cannot re member thera with any precise discrimination frora any other Hyperborean nation : and all the barbarous names at tbe end of the first volume, and the gibberish in the Appendix, was to me as uninteUigible as if I repeated Abracadabra; and raade no impression on me but to raise respect of your pa tience, and admire a sagacity that could extract meaning and suite from what seemed to me the raost indigestible of all ma terials. You rise in my estimation in proportion to the dis agreeable mass of your ingredients. What gave me pleasure that I felt was the exquisite sense and wit of your Introduc tion ; and your masterly handling and confutation of the Mac- ' After an inquiry, instituted by the National Assembly, the whole was found to be a villanous fabrication. — E. ' Now first collected. 336 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. phersons, Whitaker, &c. there and through your work. Ob jection I have but one, I think you make yourself too much a party against the Celts. I do not think they were or are worthy of hatred. Upon the whole, dear Sir, you see that your work is too learned and too deep for my capacity and shallow knowledge. I have told you that my reading and knowledge is and always was trifiing and superficial, and never taken up or pursued but for present amusement I always was incapable of dry and unentertaining studies ; and of all studies the origin of nations never was to my taste. Old age and frequent dis orders have dulled both my curiosity and attention, as well as weakened my memory ; and I cannot fix ray attention to long deductions. I say to myself, " What is knowledge to me, who stand on the verge, and must leave any old stores as well as what I may add to them; and how little could that be ?" Having thus confessed the truth, I am sure you are too candid and liberal to be offended : you cannot doubt of my high respect for your extraordinary abihties : I am even proud of having discovered them of myself without any clue. I should be very insincere, if I pretended to have gone through with eagerness your last work, which demands raore intense attention than my age, eyes, and avocations will allow. I cannot read long together; and you are sensible that your work is not a book to be read by snatches and intervals ; espe cially as the novelty, to me at least requires some helps to connect it with the memory. TO MISS HANNAH MORE.* Strawben-y HUl, August 9, 1789. You are not very corresponding, (though better of late,) and therefore I will not load the conscience of your fingers much, lest you should not answer me in three months. I am happy that you are content with ray edition of your Ghost, and with the brown copy. Everybody is charmed with your ' Now first collected. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 837 poem : I have not heard one breath but of applause. In con firmation, I enclose a note to me from the Duchess of Glou cester, who certainly never before wished to be an authoress. You may lay it up in the archives of Cowslip-green, and carry it along with your other testimonials to Parnassus.* Mr. Carter, to whom I sent a copy, is delighted with it The Bishop, with whom I dined last week, is extremely for your printing an edition for yourself, and desired I would press you to it. Mind, I do press you; and could Bonner's Ghost be laid again, — which is impossible, for it will walk for ever, and by day too, — we would have it laid in the Red Sea by some West Indian merchant, who must be afraid of spirits, and cannot be in charity with you. Mrs. Boscawen dined at Fulham with me. It rained all day ; and, though the last of July, we had fires in every room, as if Bonner had been still in possession of the see. I have not dared to recollect you too often by overt acts, dear Madam ; as, by the slowness of your answer, you seem to be sorry my meraory was so very alert Besides, it looks as if you had a mind to keep me at due distance, by the great civility and cold complimentality of your letter; a style I flattered myself you had too much good will towards me to use. Pretensions to humility I know are generally traps to flattery; but, could you know how very low my opinion is of rayself, I ara sure you would not have used the terms to me you did, and which I will not repeat, as they are by no means applicable to me. If I ever had tinsel parts, age has not only tarnished them, but convinced me how frippery they were. Sweet are your CowsUps, sour my Strawberry HiU ; My fruits are faUen, your blossoms flourish stiU. ' In reply to this. Miss More says, " You not only do all you can to turn my head by printing my trumpery verses yourself, but you call in royal aid to complete my delirium. I comfort myself you wiU counteract some part of the injury you have done my principles this summer, by a regular course of abuse when we meet in the winter : remember that you owe this to my moral health ; next to being flattered, I like to be scolded ; but to be let quietly alone would be intolerable. Dr. Johnson once said to me, ' Never mind whether they praise or abuse your writings ; anything is tolerable except obUvion.'" Memoirs, vol. ii. p. 169. — E. VOL. VI. z 338 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. Mrs. Boscawen told me last night, that she had received a long letter from you, which makes me flatter myself you have had no return of your nervous complaints. Mrs. Wal singham I have seen four or five times : Miss Boyle has de corated their house most charmingly; she has not only de signed, but carved in marble, three beautiful bas-reliefs, with boys, for a chimney-piece; besides painting elegant pannels for the library, and forming, I do not know how, pilasters of black and gold beneath glass ; in short we are so improved in taste, that if it would be decent I could like to live fifty or sixty years more, just to see how matters go on. In the mean time, I wish ray Macbethian wizardess would tell me " that Cowshp Dale should come to Strawberry Hill ; " which, by the etiquette of oracles, you know, would certainly happen, because so improbable. I will be content if the nymph of the dale will visit the old man of the mountain, and her most sincere friend. TO JOHN PINKERTON, ESQ.* Strawberry HiU, August 14, 1789. I MUST certainly have expressed myself very awkwardly, dear Sir, if you conceive I meant the slightest censure on your book, much less on your manner of treating it; which is as able, and clear, and demonstrative as possible. No; it was myself, my age, ray want of apprehension and raemory, and ray total ignorance of the subject which I intended to blame. I never did taste or study the very ancient his tories of nations. I never had a good memory for names of persons, regions, places, which no specific circumstances concurred to make me remember : and now, at seventy-two, when, as is comraon, I forget numbers of names most famihar to me, is it possible I should read with pleasure any work that consists of a vocabulary so totally new to me? Many years ago, when my faculties were much less impaired, I ' Now first collected. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 339 was forced to quit Dow's History of Indostan, because the Indian names made so little impression on me, that I went backward instead of forward, and was every minute revert ing to the former page to find about whom I was reading. Your book was a still more laborious work to me; for it contains such a series of argumentation that it demanded a double effort from a weak old head ; and, when I had made myself master of a deduction, I forgot it the next day, and had my pains to renew. These defects have for some time been so obvious to me, that I never read now but the most trifling books ; having often said that at the very end of life, it is useless to be improving one's stock of knowledge, great or sraall, for the next world. Thus, Sir, all I have said in my last letter or in this, is an encomium on your work, not a censure or criticism. It would be hard on you, indeed, if my incapacity detracted from your merit Your arguments in defence of works of science and deep disquisition are most just; and I am sure I have neither power nor disposition to answer them. You have treated your raatter as it ought to be treated. Profound men or con versant in the subject, like Mr. Dempster, wUl be pleased with it for the very reasons that made it difficult to me. If Sir Isaac Newton had written a fairy tale, I should have swallowed it eagerly ; but do you imagine. Sir, that, idle as I am, I am idiot enough to think that Sir Isaac had better have amused me for half an hour, than enlightened mankind and all ages ? I was so fair as to confess to you that your work was above me, and did not divert me : you was too candid to take that ill, and must have been content with silently think ing me very silly ; and I am too candid to condemn any man for thinking of rae as I deserve. I ara only sorry when I do deserve a disadvantageous character. Nay, Sir, you condescend, after all, to ask my opinion of the best way of treating antiquities; and, by the context I suppose you mean, how to make them entertaining. I cannot answer you in one word ; because there are two ways, as there are two sorts of readers. I should therefore say, to please antiquaries of judgment, as you have treated them, z 2 340 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. with arguments and proofs; but, if you would adapt anti quities to the taste of those who read only to be diverted, not to be instructed, the nostrum is very easy and short. You must divert them in the true sense of the word diverto ; you must turn them out of the way, you must treat them with digressions nothing or very little to the purpose. But easy as 1 call this recipe, you, I beheve, would find it more difficult to execute, than the indefatigable industry you have employed to penetrate chaos and extract the truth. There have been professors who have engaged to adapt all kinds of knowledge to the meanest capacities. I doubt their success, at least on me : however, you need not despair ; all readers are not as dull and superannuated as, dear Sir, yours, &c. TO JOHN PINKERTON, ESQ.* Strawberry HiU, August 19, 1789. I WILL not use many words, but enough, I hope, to con vince you that I meant no irony in my last. All I said of you and myself was very sincere. It is my true opinion that your understanding is one of the strongest, most manly, and clearest I ever knew ; and, as I hold my own to be of a very inferior kind, and know it to be incapable of sound, deep application, I should have been very foolish if I had at tempted to sneer at you or your pursuits. Mine have always been light and trifling, and tended to nothing but my casual arauseraent ; I will not say, without a little vain ambition of showing some parts; but never with industry sufficient to make me apply them to anything solid. My studies, if they could be called so, and my productions, were alike desultory. In my latter age I discovered the futility both of my objects and writings : I felt how insignificant is the reputation of an author of mediocrity ; and that being no genius, I only added one name more to a list of writers that had told the world nothing but what it could as well be without. These reflections were the best proofs of my sense ; and, ' Now first coUected. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 341 when I could see through my own vanity, there is less wonder at my discovering that such talents as I might have had, are impaired at seventy-two. Being just to myself, I am not such a coxcomb as to be unjust to you. No, nor did I cover any irony towards you, in the opinion I gave you of the way of making deep writings palatable to the mass of readers. Examine my words; and I am sure you will find that if there was anything ironic in my meaning, it was levelled at your readers, not at you. It is ray opinion that whoever wishes to be read by many, if his subject is weighty and solid, must treat the majority with more than is to his pur pose. Do not you believe that twenty name Lucretius be cause of the poetic coraraenceraent of his books, for five that wade through his philosophy ? I promised to say but httle ; and, if I have explained my self clearly, I have said enough. It is not I hope, my cha racter to be a flatterer : I do most sincerely think you capa ble of great things ; and I should be a pitiful knave if I told you so, unless it was my opinion; and what end could it serve to me ? Your course is but beginning ; mine is almost terrainated. I do not want you to throw a few daisies on ray grave ; and if you make the figure I augur you will, I shall not be a witness to it Adieu, dear Sir ! TO RICHARD GOUGH, ESQ. Strawberry HiU, August 24, 1789. I SHALL heartily lament with you, Sir, the demolition of those beautiful chapels at Salisbury. I was scandalized long ago at the ruinous state in which they were indecently suffered to reraain. It appears as strange, that, when a spirit of restoration and decoration has taken place, it should be raixed with barbarous innovation. As much as taste has improved, I do not believe that modern execution will equal our models. I am sorry that I can only regret not prevent I do not know the Bishop of Salisbury' even by sight, and ' Dr. Shute Barrington; in 1791, translated to the see of Durham. — E. 342 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. certainly have no credit to obstruct any of his plans. Should I get sight of Mr. Wyatt, which it is not easy to do, I will reraonstrate against the intended alteration; but probably without success, as I do not suppose he has authority enough to interpose effectually: stiU I wUl try. It is an old com plaint with rae. Sir, that when faraihes are extinct chapters take the freedom of removing ancient monuraents, and even of selhng over again the sites of such torabs. A scandalous, nay, dishonest abuse, and very unbecoming clergymen ! Is it creditable for divines to traffic for consecrated ground, and which the church had already sold ? I do not wonder that magnificent monuments are out of fashion, when they are treated so disrespectfully. You, Sir, alone have placed se veral out of the reach of such a kind of siraoniacal abuse ; for to buy into the church, or to sell the church's land twice over, breathes a simUar kind of spirit. Perhaps, as the subscription indicates taste, if some of the subscribers could be persuaded to object to the removal of the two beautiful chapels, as contrary to their view of beautifying, it might have good effect ; or, if some letter were published in the papers against the destruction, as barbarous and the result of bad taste, it might divert the design. I zealously wish it were stopped, but I know none of the chapter or subscribers.* TO THE MISS BERRYS. Strawberry HiU, Thursday evening, Aug. 27, 1789. I JUMPED for joy, — that is, my heart did, which is all the remain of me that is in statu jumpante, — at the receipt of your ' Much discussion on the subject of the injury done to Salisbury cathedral, here complained of by Walpole, took place in the Gentleman s Magazine for this and the foUowing year. " This good," says the writer of a learned article on Cathedral Antiquities, in the Quarterly Review for 1825, " has arisen from the injury which was done at Salisbury, that in subsequent undertakings of the same kind, the architect has come to his work with greater respect for the structures upon which he was em ployed, and a mind more embued with the principles of Gothic architec ture."— E. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 343 letter this morning, which tells me you approve of the house at Teddington. How kind you was to answer so inconti nently ! I believe you borrowed the best steed from the races. I have sent to the landlord to corae to me to-morrow : but I could not resist beginning my letter to-night, as I am at home alone, with a little pain in my left wrist; but the right one has no brotherly feeling for it, and would not be put off so. You ask how you have deserved such attentions? Why, by deserving thera ; by every kind of merit, and by that super lative one to me, your submitting to throw away so much time on a forlorn antique — you two, who, without specifying particulars, (and you raust, at least, be conscious that you are not two frights,) might expect any fortune and distinctions, and do delight all corapanies. On which side lies the won der? Ask me no more such questions, or I will cram you with reasons. My poor dear niece* grows worse and worse: the raedical people do not pretend to give us any hopes ; they only say she may last some weeks, which I do not expect, nor do ab sent myself. I had promised Mr. Barrett to make a visit .to my Gothic child, his house, on Sunday ; but I have written to-day to excuse myself: so I have to the Duchess of Rich mond,^ who wanted me to meet her raother, sister,^ and Gene ral Conway, at Goodwood next week. I wish Lady FitzwiUiam raay not hear the same bad news as I expect, in the midst of her royal visitors : her sister, the Duchess of St. Albans, is dying, in the same way as Lady Dysart ; and for some days has not been in her senses. How charming you are to leave those festivities for your good parents ; who I do not wonder are impatient for you. I, who am old enough to be your great-grandmother, know one needs not be your near relation to long for your return. Of all your ' The Countess of Dysart.— M. B. ' Lady Mary Bruce, daughter of the Earl of Ailesbury, by CaroUne CampbeU, daughter of General John Campbell, afterwards Duke of Argyle.— M. B. ' Mrs. Damer, only child of the Dowager Countess of Ailesbury, by Marshal Henry Seymour Conway, her second husband. She was thus half-sister to the Duchess of Richmond. — M. B. 344 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. four, next to your duteous visits, I most approve the jaunt to the sea : I believe in its salutary air more than in the whole college and all its works. You must not expect any news from me, French or home bred. I am not in the way of hearing any : your morning gazetteer rarely calls on me, as I am not likely to pay him in kind. About royal progresses, paternal or filial, I never inquire; nor do you, I believe, care more than I do. The sraall wares in which the societies at Richraond and Hamp ton-court deal, are still less to our taste. My poor niece and her sisters take up most of my time and thoughts : but I will not attrist you to indulge myself, but wUl break off here, and finish my letter when I have seen your new landlord. Good night ! Friday. Well ! I have seen him, and nobody was ever so accomrao dating! He is as courteous as a candidate for a county. You may stay in his house till Christmas if you please, and shall pay but twenty pounds ; and if more furniture is want ing, it shall be supplied. TO THE MISS BERRYS. Strawberry HiU, Sept. 4, 1789. You ask whether I will call you wise or stupid for leav ing York races in the middle — neither ; had you chosen to stay, you would have done rightly. The more young persons see, where there is nothing blameable, the better ; as increasing the stock of ideas early wiU be a resource for age. To resign pleasure to please tender relations is amiable, and superior to wisdom ; for wisdom, however laudable, is but a selfish virtue. But I do decide peremptorily, that it was very prudent to decline the invitation to Wentworth House,* which was obligingly given; but as I am very proud for you, I should have dishked your being included in a mobbish kind * The Prince of Wales and the Duke of York were going to receive a great entertainment at Wentworth House. — M. B. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 345 of cohue. You two are not to go where any other two misses would have been equally prices, and where people would have been thinking of the princes raore than of the Berrys, Be sides, princes are so rife now, that, besides my sweet nephew* in the Park, we have another at Richmond: the Duke of Clarence has taken Mr. Henry Hobarf s house, point-blank over against Mr. Cambridge's, which will make the good woman of that mansion cross herself piteously, and stretch the throat of the blatant beast at Sudbrook,^ and of all the other pious matrons a la ronde ; for his Royal Highness, to divert lonesomeness, has brought with him , who, being still raore averse to solitude, declares that any tempter would make even Paradise more agreeable than a constant tite-d-tete. I agree with you in not thinking Beatrice one of Miss Farren's capital parts. Mrs. Pritchard played it with more spirit, and was superior to Garrick's Benedict; so is Kemble, too, as he is to Quin in Maskwell. Kemble and Lysons the clergyman^ passed all Wednesday here with me. The former is melting the three parts of Henry the Sixth into one piece : I doubt it will be difficult to make a tolerable play out of them. I have talked scandal from Richraond, like its gossips ; and now, by your queries after Lady Luxborough, you are drawing me into more, which I do not love : but she is dead and forgot ten, except on the shelves of an old library, or on those of my old memory ; which you will be routing into. The lady you wot of, then, was the first wife of Lord Catherlogh, before he was an earl; and who was son of Knight, the South Sea cashier, and whose second wife lives here at Twickenham. Lady Luxborough, a high-coloured lusty black woman, was parted frora her husband, upon a gallantry she had with Dal ton, the reviver of Comus and a divine. She retired into the country; corresponded, as you see by her letters, with the ' The Duke of Gloucester.— E. ' Lady Greenwich. " The "little Daniel" of the Pursuits of Literature, brother of Samuel Lysons, the learned antiquary, and author of " The Environs, twelve miles round London," in four volumes quarto — " Nay once, for purer air o'er rural ground. With little Daniel went his twelve mUes round." — E. 346 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. smaU poets of that time; but, having no Theseus amongst them, consoled herself, as it is said, hke Ariadne, with Bacchus.* This might be a fable, hke that of her Cretan Highness — no matter ; the fry of little anecdotes are so nu merous now, that throwing one more into the shoal is of no consequence, if it entertains you for a moment ; nor need you believe what I don't warrant. Gra'mercy for your intention of seeing Wentworth Castle : it is my favourite of all great seats; — such a variety of ground, of wood, and water; and alraost all executed and disposed with so much taste by the present Earl. Mr. Gilpin sillily could see nothing but faults there. The new front is, in my opinion, one of the lightest and most beautiful buildings on earth : and, pray like the little Gothic edifice, and its position in the menagerie ! I recommended it and had it drawn by Mr. Bentley, from Chichester Cross. Don't bring me a pair of scissars from Sheffield : I am determined nothing shall cut our loves, though I should live out the rest of Methusalem's term, as you kindly wish, and as I can believe, though you are my wives; for I am persuaded my Agnes wishes so too. Don't you ? At night. I ara just corae from Cambridge's, where I have not been in an evening, time out of raind. Major Dixon, ahas " the Charraing-man," "* is there; but I heard nothing of the Em peror's rickets:^ a great deal, and many horrid stories, of ' Lady Luxborough died in 1756. Her letters to Shenstone were pub lished in 1775. In the first leaf of the original manuscript there is an autograph of the poet, describing them as being " written with abundant ease, politeness, and vivacity ; in which she was scarce equalled by any woman of her time." Some of her verses are printed in Dodsley's Mis cellany, and Walpole has introduced her ladyship into his Noble Au thors. — E. 2 Edward Jerningham, Esq. of Cossey, in Norfolk, uncle to the present Lord Stafford. He was distinguished in his day by the name of Jer ningham the poet ; but it was an unpoetical day. The stars of Byron, of BaUlie, and of Scott, had not risen on the horizon. The well-merited distinction of Jerningham was the friendship, affection, and intimacy which his amiable character had impressed on the author, and on all of his society mentioned in these letters. — M. B. ' This alludes to something said in a character which Mr. Jerningham had assumed, for the amusement of a society some time before at Marshal Conway's. — M. B. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 347 the violences in France; for his brother, the Chevalier Jer ningham, is just arrived from Paris. You have heard of the destruction of thirty-two chateaus in Burgundy, at the in stigation of a demon, who has since been broken on the rack. There is now assembled near Paris a body of six teen thousand deserters, daily increasing; who, they fear, will encamp and dictate to the capital, in spite of their mi htia of twenty thousand bourgeois. It will soon, I suppose, ripen to several armies, and a civil war ; a fine acheminement to liberty ! My poor niece is still alive, though weaker every day, and pronounced irrecoverable : yet it is possible she may live some weeks ; which, however, is neither to be expected nor wished, for she eats little and sleeps less. Still she is calm, and behaves with the patience of a martyr. You raay perceive, by the forraer part of ray letter, that I have been dipping into Spenser again, though he is no passion of mine : there I hghted upon two lines that at first sight, reminded me of Mademoiselle d'Eon, " Now, when Marfisa had put off her beaver. To be a woman every one perceive her ; " but I do not think that is so perceptible in the Chevaliere. She looked more feminine, as I remember her, in regimentals, than she does now. She is at best a hen-dragoon, or an Herculean hostess. I wonder she does not make a cam paign in her own country, and offer her sword to the almost- dethroned monarch, as a second Joan of Arc* Adieu ! for ' Miss More gives the following account of this extraordinary charac ter : — " On Friday I gratified the curiosity of many years, by meeting at dinner Madame la ChevaUfere D'Eon ; she is extremely entertaining, has universal information, wit, vivacity, and gaiety. Something too much of the latter (I have heard), when she has taken a bottle or two of Bur gundy ; but this being a very sober party, she was kept entirely within the limits of decorum. General Johnson was of the party, and it was ridiculous to hear her miUtary conversation. Sometimes it was, ' Quand j'^tais colonel d'un tel regiment ;' then again, ' Non, c'etait quand j'^tais secretaire d'ambassade du Due de Nivernois,' or ' Quand je ne- gociais la paix de Paris.' She is, to be sure, a phenomenon in history ; and, as such, a great curiosity. But one D'Eon is enough, and one slice of her quite sufficient." Memoirs, vol. ii. p. 156. — E. 348 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. three weeks 1 shaU say, Sancte Michael, ora pro nobis ! You seem to have relinquished your plan of sea-coasting. I shall be sorry for that ; it would do you good. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry HUl, Sept. 5, 1789. You speak so unpereraptorily of your motions, that I must direct to you at random : the most probable place where to hit you, I think, will be Goodwood ; and I do address this thither, because I am impatient to thank you for your tale, which is very pretty and easy and genteel. It has made me make a reflection, and that reflection made six lines ; which I send you, not as good, but as expressing my thoughts on your writing so well in various ways which you never prac tised when you was much younger. Here they are : The Muse most wont to fire a youthful heart. To gild your setting sun reserved her art ; To crown a life in virtuous labours pass'd, Bestow'd her numbers, and her wit at last ; And, when your strength and eloquence retire. Your voice in notes harmonious shall expire. The swan was too common a thought to be directly specified, and, perhaps, even to be alluded to : no raatter, such a trifle is below criticism. I am still here, in no uncertainty, God knows, about poor Lady Dysart* of whom there are not the smallest hopes. She grows weaker every day, and does actually stiU go out for the air, and may languish raany days, though raost pro bably will go off in a moment, as the water rises. She re tains her senses perfectly, and as perfectly her unalterable calmness and patience, though fully sensible of her situation. At your return from Goodwood, I shall like to come to you, if you are unengaged, and ready to receive me. For the ' Her ladyship, who was the daughter of Sir Edward Walpole and the first wife of Lionel fourth Earl of Dysart, died on the day this letter was written. — E. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. .S49 beauties of Park-place, I am too well acquainted with them, not, like all old persons about their contemporaries, to think it preserves them long after they are faded ; and I am so un- walking, that prospects are more agreeable to me when framed and glazed, and I look at thera through a window. It is yourselves I want to visit, not your verdure. Indeed, except a parenthesis of scarce all August there has been no terap- tation to walk abroad ; and the tempter himself would not have persuaded me, if I could, to have climbed that long- lost mountain whence he could show one even the Antipodes. It rained incessantly all June and all July ; and now again we have torrents every day. Jerningham's brother, the Chevalier, is arrived from Paris, and does not diminish the horrors one hears every day. They are now in the capital dreading the sixteen thousand deserters who hover about them. I conclude that when in the character of banditti the whole disbanded army have plundered and destroyed what they can, they will congregate into sepa rate armies under different leaders, who will hang out different principles, and the kingdom will be a theatre of civil wars ; and, instead of liberty, the nation will get petty tyrants, perhaps petty kingdoms : and when milhons have suffered, or been sacrificed, the government will be no better than it was, all owing to the intemperance of the etats, who might have obtained a good constitution, or at least one much me liorated, if they had set out with discretion and moderation. They have left too a sad lesson to despotic princes, who will quote this precedent of frantic etats, against assembling any more, and against all the examples of senates and parliaraents that have preserved rational freedora. Let me know when it will be convenient to you to receive me. Adieu ! TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Strawberry HiU, Sept. — , 1789. I KNOW whence you wrote last but not where you are now ; you gave me no hint 1 believe you fly lest I should pur- 350 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. sue, and as if you were angry that I have forced you to sprout into laurels. Yet you say you are vain of it and that you are no philosopher. Now, if you are vain, I am sure you are a philosopher ; for it is a maxim of mine, and one of my own making, that there never was a philosopher that did not love sweetmeats. You tell me too, that you like I should scold you; but since you have appeared as Bonner's ghost I think I shaU feel too much awe; for though (which I never expected would be in my power) I have made you stand in a white sheet, I doubt my respect is increased. I never did rate you for being too bad, but too good : and if, when you make up your week's account you flnd but a fraction of vanity in the sum total, you wiU faU to repenting, and come forth on Monday as humble as * * *. Then, if I huff my heart out you wiU only simper, and stiU wrap yourself up in your obstinate goodness. Well ! take your own way ; I give you up to all your abominable virtues, and will go answer the rest of your letter. I congratulate you on the demolition of the Bastille; I mean as you do, of its functions.* For the poor soul itself, I had no iU wiU to it: on the contrary, it was a curious saraple of ancient castellar dungeons, which the good folks the founders took for palaces: yet I always hated to drive by it, knowing the miseries it contained. Of itself it did not gobble up prisoners to glut its maw, but received them by command. The destruction of it was silly, and agree able to the ideas of a mob, who do not know stones and bars and bolts from a lettre de cachet. If the country re mains free, the Bastille would be as tame as a ducking- stool, now that there is no such thing as a scold. If des potism recovers, the Bastille will rise from its ashes ! — re cover, I fear, it will. The Etats cannot remain a mob of kings, and will prefer a single one to a larger mob of kings ' Miss More had written to Walpole, — " Poor France ! though I am sorry that the lawless rabble are so triumphant, I cannot help hoping, that some good will arisefrom the sum of human misery having been so considerably lessened at one blow by the destruction of the Bastille. The utter extinction of the Inquisition, and the redemption of Africa, I hope yet to see accomplished." Memoirs, vol. ii. p. 170. — E. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 351 and greater tyrants. The nobility, the clergy, and people of property will wait, till by address and money they can divide the people; or, whoever gets the larger or more victorious army into his hands, will be a Cromwell or a Monk. In short, a revolution procured by a national ver tigo does not proraise a crop of legislators. It is time that composes a good constitution: it formed ours. We were near losing it by the lax and unconditional restoration of Charles the Second. The revolution was temperate, and has lasted; and, though it might have been improved, we know that with all its moderation it disgusted half the nation, who would have brought back the old sores. I abominate the Inquisition as much as you do : yet if the King of Spain receives no check like his cousin Louis, I fear he will not be disposed to relax any terrors. Every crowned head in Europe must ache at present; and the frantic and barbarous proceedings in France will not melio rate the stock of liberty, though for some tirae their majesties will be mighty tender of the rights of their subjects. According to this hypothesis, I can administer some com fort to you about your poor negroes. I do not imagine that they will be emancipated at once ; but their fate will be much alleviated, as the atterapt will have alarmed their butchers enough to raake thera gentler, hke the European monarchs, for fear of provoking the disinterested, who have no sugar plantations, to abolish the horrid traffic. I do not understand the manoeuvre of sugar, and, perhaps, am going to talk nonsense, as my idea may be impracticable ; but 1 wish human wit which is really very considerable in mechanics and merchantry, could devise some method of cultivating canes and making sugar without the manual la bour of the human species. How many mills and inven tions have there not been discovered to supply succeda- neuras to the work of the hands, and which before the discoveries would have been treated as visions ! It is true, raanual labour has sometimes taken it very ill to be excused, and has destroyed such mills ; but the poor negroes would not rise and insist upon being worked to death. Pray talk S52 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. to some ardent genius, but do not name me; not merely because I may have talked like an idiot but because my ignorance might ipso facto, stamp the idea with ridicule. People, I know, do not love to be put out of their old ways : no farmer listens at first to new inventions in agriculture; and I don't doubt but bread was originally deemed a new fangled vagary, by those who had seen their fathers live very comfortably upon acorns. Nor is there any harm in start ing new game to invention : many excellent discoveries have been made by men who were d la chasse of something very different. I am not quite sure that the arts of making gold and of living for ever have been yet found out : yet to how many noble discoveries has the pursuit of those nostrums given birth ! Poor chymistry, had she not had such glorious objects in view ! If you are sitting under a cowslip at your cottage, these reveries may amuse you for half an hour, at least make you ' smile ; and for the ease of your conscience, which is always in a panic, they require no answer.* I will not ask you about the new History of Bristol,^ be cause you are too good a citizen to say a word against your native place ; but do pray cast your eye on the prints of the cathedral and castle, the chef-d' ceuvres of Chatterton's igno rance, and of Mr. Barrett's too; and on two letters pre tended to have been sent to me, and which never were sent. If my incredulity had wavered, they would have fixed it I wish the milkwoman would assert that Boadicea's dairy maid had invented Dutch tUes; it would be like Chatter ton's origin of heraldry and painted glass, in those two letters. I must, however, mention one word about myself. In the new fourth volume of the Biographia Britannica I am more candidly treated about that poor lad than usual: yet the ' To this passage Miss More thus repUes :— " Your project for reliev ing our poor slaves by machine work is so far from being wild or chime rical, that of three persons deep and able in the concern (Mr. Wilber force among others), not one but has thought it rational and practicable, and that a plough may be so constructed as to save much misery." Me moirs, vol. ii. p. 187.- — E. = " The History and Antiquities of Bristol, by WiUiam Barrett:" Bristol, 1789, quarto; a work which Mr. Park described as "a mot ley compound of real and superstitious history." — E. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 353 writer stUl affirms that according to my own account my reply was too much in the common-place style of court- replies. Now my own words, and the truth, as they stand in print in the very letter of raine which this author quotes, were, " I wrote him a letter with as much kindness and tenderness as if I had been his guardian." Is this by my own account a court-reply ? Nor did I conceive, for I never was a courtier, that courtiers are wont to make tender replies to the poor ; I am glad to bear they do. I have kept this letter some days in my writing-box, tUl I could meet with a stray member of parliament for it is not worth making you pay for : but when you talk to me I cannot help answering incontinently: besides, can one take up a letter at a long distance, and heat one's reply over again with the same interest that it occasioned at first? Adieu I I wish you may come to Hampton before I leave these purlieus ! Yours More and More. TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Strawberry Hill, Nov. 4, 1789. I AM not surprised, ray dear Madara, that the notice of my illness should have stimulated your predominant quahty, your sensibihty. I cannot do less in return than relieve it immediately, by assuring you that I am in a manner recovered ; and should have gone out before this time, if my mind were as much at ease as my poor limbs. I have passed five months most uncomfortably; the two last most unhappily. In June and September I had two bad falls by my own lameness and weakness, and was much bruised ; while I was witness to the danger, and then to the death, of my invaluable niece. Lady Dysart She was angehc, and has left no children. The un expected death of Lord Waldegrave,* one of the raost amiable of men, has not only deprived me of him, but has opened a ' George fourth Earl of Waldegi-ave, born in 1751 ; married, in 1782, his cousin Lady Elizabeth Laura Waldegi-ave, daughter of James, the second Earl. He died on the 22nd of October. — E. VOL. VI. 2 A 354 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1789. dreadful scene of calamities ! He and my niece were the happiest and most domestic of couples. Your kind inquiries after me have drawn these detaUs from me, for which I make no excuse : good-nature never grudges its pity. I, who love to force your gravity to sraUe, am seri ously better pleased to indulge your benevolence with a sub ject of esteera, which, though moving your compassion, wiU be accompanied by no compunction. I wiU now answer your let ter. Your plea, that not composition, but business, has occa sioned your silence, is no satisfaction to me. In my present anxious sohtude I have again read Bonner and Florio, and the Bas Bleu ; and do you think I am pleased to learn that you have not been writing ? Who is it says something hke this line ? — Hannah wUl not write, and LactiUa will. They who think her Earl Goodwin will outgo Shakspeare, might be in the right if they specified in what way. I believe she may write worse than he sometimes did, though that is not easy ; but to excel him — oh ! I have not words adequate to my conterapt for those who can suppose such a possibility ! I ara sorry, very sorry, for what you tell me of poor Barrett's fate. Though he did write worse than Shakspeare, it is great pity he was told so, as it killed him ; and I rejoice that I did not publish a word in contradiction of the letters which he said Chatterton sent to me, as I was advised to do. I might have laughed at the poor man's folly, and then I should have been miserable to have added a grain to the poor man's mor tification.* You rejoice me, not my vanity, by telling rae my idea of a mechanic succedaneum to the labour of negroes is not vision ary, but thought practicable. Oh ! how I wish I understood sugar and ploughs, and could marry them ! Alas ! I under stand nothing useful. My head is as un-mechanic as it is un- arithraetic, un-georaetric, un-raetaphysic, un-commercial : but ' Mr. Barrett was the person who first encouraged Chatterton to pub lish the poems which he attributed to Rowley. He was a respectable surgeon at Brii^tol. — E. 1789. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 355 will not some one of those superior heads to whom you have talked on my indigested hint reduce it to practicabihty? How a feasible scheme would stun those who call humanity roman tic, and show, from the books of the Custom-house, that mur der is a great improvement of the revenue ! Even the pre sent situation of France is favourable. Could not Mr. Wil berforce obtain to have the enfranchisement of the negroes started there? The Jews are claiming their natural rights there ; and blacks are certainly not so great defaulters as the Hebrews, though they too have undergone ample persecutions. Methinks, as Lord George Gordon is in correspondence with the Etats, he has been a little remiss in not signing the petition of those of his new communion. The Etats are detestable and despicable ; and, in fact, guilty of the outrages of the Parisian and provincial mobs. The mob of twelve hundred, not legislators, but dissolvers of all laws, unchained the mastiffs that had been tied up, and were sure to worry all who fell in their way. To annihilate all laws, however bad, and to have none ready to replace them, was proclaiming anarchy. What should one think of a mad- doctor, who should let loose a lunatic, suffer him to burn Bedlam, chop off the heads of the keepers, and then consult with sorae students in physic on the gentlest raode of treating delirium? By a late vote I see that the twelve hundred praters are reduced to five hundred : vive la reine Billingsgate ! the Thalestris who has succeeded Louis Quatorze ! A com mittee of those Amazons stopped the Duke of Orleans, who, to use their style, I believe is not a barrel the better herring. Your reflections on Vertot's passion for revolutions are admirable,* and yet it is natural for an historian to like to describe times of action. Halcyon days do not furnish raatter for talents ; they are like the virtuous couple in a comedy, a little insipid. Mr. Manly and Lady Grace, Mellefont and Cynthia, do not interest one much. Indeed, in a tragedy ' Miss More, in her last letter, had said — " What a pity it is that Vertot is not aUve ! that man's element was a state convufcion ; he hop ped over peaceful intervals, as periods of no value, and only seemed to enjoy himself when aU the rest of the world was sad. Storm and tem pest were his halcyon days." — E. 2 A 2 356 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1790. where they are unhappy, they give the audience full satisfac tion, and no envy. The newspapers, no doubt, thought Dr. Priestley could not do better than to espouse you.* He cer tainly would be very judicious, could be obtain your consent ; but alas ! you would soon squabble about Socinianasjw, or some of those isms. To tell you tbe truth, I hate all those Constantinopolitan jargons, that set people together by the ears about pedantic terms. When you apply scholastic phrases as happily and genteelly as you do in your Bas Bleu, they are dehghtful ; but don't muddify your charming simpli city with controversial distinctions, that wUl sour your sweet piety. Sects are the bane of charity, and have deluged the world with blood. I do not mean, by what I am going to say, to extort another letter from you before I have the pleasure of seeing you at Hampton; but I really shall be much obliged to you for a single line soon, only to tell me if Miss Williams is at Stoke with the Duchess of Beaufort. To a short note, cannot you add a short P. S. on the fate of Earl Goodwin ?^ Lac mihi — novum non frigore desit. Adieu ! my amiable friend ! Yours most sincerely. TO MISS HANNAH MORE. Berkeley Square, Feb. 20, 1790. It is very provoking that people must always be hanging or drowning themselves, or going mad, that you forsooth, ' In her letter to Walpole Miss More had said,—" I comforted myself, that your two fair wives were within reach of your elbow-chair, and that their pleasant society would somewhat mitigate the sufferings of your confinement. Apropos of two wives — when the newspapers the other day were pleased to marry me to Dr. Priestley, I am surprised they did not rather choose to bestow me on Mr. Madan, as his wife is probably better broken in to these eastern usages, than Mrs. Priestley may be. I never saw the Doctor but once in my life, and he had then been married above twenty years." Memoirs, vol. ii. p. 188. — E. = Ann Yearsley's tragedy, which had just been represented, with Uttle success, at the Bath and Bristol theatres. In reply to Walpole's query Miss More says, " There are, I dare say, some pretty passages in it, but all seem to bring it in guilty of the crime of dullness; which I take to be the greatest fault in dramatic composition." — E. 1790. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 357 Mistress, may have the diversion of exercising your pity and good-nature, and charity, and intercession, and all that bead- roll of virtues that make you so troublesome and araiable, when you raight be ten tiraes more agreeable by writing things that would not cost one above half-a-crown at a time.* You are an absolutely walking hospital, and travel about into lone and bye places, with your doors open to house stray casual ties ! I wish at least that you would have some children yourself, that you might not be plaguing one for all the pretty brats that are starving and friendless. I suppose it was sorae such goody two or three thousand years ago that suggested the idea of an alraa-mater, suckling the three hundred and sixty -five bantlings of the Countess of Hainault Well, as your newly-adopted pensioners have two babes, I insist on your accepting two guineas for them instead of one at present (that is, when you shall be present). If you cannot circumscribe your own charities, you shall not stint raine. Madam, who can afford it much better, and who must be dunned for alms, and do not scramble over hedges and ditches in searching for op.i portunities of flinging away my money on good works. I employ mine better at auctions, and in buying pictures and baubles, and hoarding curiosities, that in truth I cannot keep long, but that wUl last for ever in my catalogue, and make me iramortal ! Alas ! will they cover a raultitude of sins ? Adieu ! I cannot jest after that sentence. Yours sincerely. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY.* Strawberry HiU, June 25, 1790. I AM glad at least that you was not fetched to town on last Tuesday, which was as hot as if Phaeton had once more gotten into his papa's curricle and driven it along the lower road ; but the old king has resumed the reins again, and ' Miss More was at this time raising a subscription for the benefit of the family of a poor man who had been cut down after he had nearly hung himself. — E. ' Now first printed. 358 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1790. does not allow us a handful more of beams than come to our northern share. I am glad, too, that I was not summoned also to the Fitzroyal arrangement : it was better to be singed here, than exposed between two such fiery furnaces as Lady Southampton and ray niece Keppel. I pity Charles Fox to be kept on the Westrainster gridiron.* Before I carae out of town, I was diverted by a story from the hustings : one of the mob called to Fox, " Well, Charley, are not you sick of your coalition ?" " Poor gentleman !" cried an old woman in the crowd, " why should not he like a collation V I am very sorry Mrs. Damer is so tormented, but I hope the new infiamraation will relieve her. As I was writing that sentence this raorning, Mesdames de Boufflers came to see me from Richmond, and brought a Comte de Moranville to see ray house. The puerile pedants of their Etats are going to pull down the statues of Louis Quatorze, like their silly ancestors, who proposed to demolish the tomb of John Duke of Bedford. The Vicomte de Mirabeau is arrested somewhere for something, perhaps for one of his least crimes ; in short, I am angry that the cause of liberty is profaned by such rascals. If the two German Kings make peace, as you hear and as I expected, the Brabanters, who seem not to have known much better what to do with their revolution, will be the first sacri fice on the altar of peace. I stick fast at the beginning of the first volume of Bruce,* though I am told it is the most entertaining ; but I am sick of his vanity, and (I beheve) of his want of veracity ; I am sure, of his want of method and of his obscurity. I hope my wives were not at Park-place in your absence : the loss of them is irreparable to rae, and I trerable to think how much more I shall feel it in three months, when I am to part with them for — who can tell how long ? Adieu ! * At the close of the election, on the 2nd of July, the numbers were, for Mr. Fox 3516, Lord Hood 3217, and Mr. Home Tooke 1697. — E. ^ Bruce's " Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile," had just appeared, in five large quarto volumes. It was dedicated to George the Third, who, whUe society in general raised a cry of incredulity against it, stood up warmly in its favour, and contended that it was a great work. — E. 1790. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 359 TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Strawberry HiU, June 26, 1790. I DO not forget your lordship's commands, though I do recollect my own inabihty to divert you. Every year at my advanced time of life would make more reasonable my plea of knowing nothing worth repeating, especially at this season. The general topic of elections is the last subject to which I could listen : there is not one about which I care a straw ; and I believe your lordship quite as indifferent. I am not much more aufait of war or peace ; I hope for the latter, nay and expect it, because it is not yet war. Pride and anger do not dehberate to the middle of the campaign ; and I believe even the great incendiaries are more intent on making a good bargain than on saving their honour. If they save lives, I care not who is the better politician ; and, as I am not to be their judge, I do not inquire what false weights they fling into the scales. Two-thirds of France, who are not so humble as I, seem to think they can entirely new-model the world with metaphysical compasses ; and hold that no injustice, no bar barity, need to be counted in making the experiment. Such legislators are sublime empirics, and in their universal benevo lence have very little individual sensibility. In short, the re sult of my reflections on what has passed in Europe for these latter centuries is, that tyrants have no consciences, and re formers no feeling ; and the world suffers both by tbe plague and by the cure. What oceans of blood were Luther and Calvin the authors of being spilt ! The late French govern ment was detestable ; yet I still doubt whether a civil war will not be the consequence of the revolution, and then what may be the upshot ? Brabant was grievously provoked ; is it sure that it will be emancipated ? For how short a time do people who set out on the most just principles, advert to their first springs of motion, and retain consistency? Nay, how long can promoters of revolutions be sure of maintaining their own ascendant ? They are like projectors, who are coraraonly ruined ; while others raake fortunes on the foundation laid by the inventors. 360 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1790. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry HiU, Wednesday night, July 1, 1790. It is certainly not from having anything to tell you, that I reply so soon, but as the most agreeable thing I can do in my confinement. The gout came into my heel the night be fore last perhaps from the deluge and damp. I increased it yesterday by limping about the house with a party I had to breakfast. To-day I am lying on the settee, unable to walk alone, or even to put on a shpper. However, as I am rauch easier this evening, I trust it will go off. I do not love disputes, and shall not argue with you about Bruce ; but if you like him, you shall not choose an author for me. It is the most absurd, obscure, and tiresome book I know. I shall admire if you have a clear conception about most of the persons and matters in his work ; but, in fact I do not believe you have. Pray, can you distinguish between his cock and hen Heghes, and between all Yasouses and Ozo- ros ? and do you firmly believe that an old man and his son were sent for and put to death, because the King had run into a thorn-bush, and was forced to leave his clothes behind him ? Is it your faith, that one of their Abyssinian Majesties plead ed not being able to contribute towards sending for a new Abuna,, because he had spent all his money at Venice in look ing-glasses ? And do you really think that Peter Paez was a Jack-of-all-trades, and built palaces and convents without as sistance, and furnished them with his own hands ? You, who are a little apt to contest most assertions, must have strangely let out your creduhty !* I could put forty questions to you as wonderful ; and, for my part, could as soon credit * * * *. ' Though Bruce's work was attacked at the time by the critics with much virulence, his statements have been more or less confirmed by Salt, Burckhardt, Witman, Clarke, Belzoni, and other distinguished traveUers. Bruce never repUed to any of his opponents ; but sometimes said to his daughter, that he hoped she would live to see the time when the truth of what he had written would be established. He lost his life in April 1794, in consequence of an accidental sUp of his foot, while handing a lady down stairs to her carriage. A second edition of his Tra vels was published in 1805, by Dr. Alexander Murray, from a copy which the traveller had himself prepared for the press. — E. 1790. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 361 I am tired of raihng at French barbarity and folly. They are raore puerile now serious, than when in the long paroxysm of gay levity. Legislators, a senate, to neglect laws, in order to annihilate coats of arms and liveries ! to pull down a King, and set up an Emperor ! They are hastening to establish the tribunal of the praetorian guards ; for the sovereignty, it seems, is not to be hereditary. One view of their Ffete of the 14th,* I suppose, is to draw money to Paris ; and the consequence will be, that the deputies wiU return to the provinces drunk with independence and self-importance, and will commit fifty times more excesses, nlassacres, and devastations, than last year. George Selwyn says, that Monsieur, the King's brother, is the only man of rank from whom they cannot take a title.^ How franticly have the French acted, and how rationally the Americans ! But Franklin and Washington were great men. None have appeared yet in France ; and Necker has only returned to make a wretched figure ! He is become as insignificant as his King; his name is never mentioned, but now and then as disapproving soraething that is done. Why then does he stay ? Does he wait to strike sorae great stroke, ' The grand federation in the Champ de Mars, on the anniversary of the taking of the Bastille, thus described by M. Thiers : — " A magnifi cent amphitheatre, formed at the further extremity, was destined for the national authorities. The King and the president sat beside one another on simUar seats. Behind the King was an elevated balcony for the Queen and the court. The ministers were at some distance before from the King, and the deputies ranged on either side. Four hundred thousand spectators occupied the lateral amphitheatres. Sixty thousand armed federalists performed their evolutions in the intermediate space; and in the centre, upon a base twenty-five feet high, stood the altar of the country. Three hundred priests, in white surpUces and tricoloured of the oath. La Fayette carried it to the altar. At this moment all the banners waved, every sabre glistened. The general, the army, the pre sident, the deputies, cried ' I swear it.' The King, standing, with his hand outstretched towards the altar, said, ' I, King of the French, swear,' &c. At this moment, the Queen, moved by the general emotion, clasped in her arms the august child, the heir to the throne, and, from the balcony, showed him to the assembled nation. At this moment shouts of joy, attachment, enthusiasm, were addressed to the mother and the chUd, and all hearts were hers." History of the Revolution, vol. i. p. 155. — E. ' On the 20th of June, a decree, that the titles of duke, count, mar quis, viscount, baron, and chevalier should be suppressed, had been car ried in the National Assembly by a large majority. — B. 362 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1790. when everything is demohshed ? His glory, which consisted in being minister though a Protestant is vanished by the de struction of popery ; the honour of which, I suppose, he wUl scarce assume to himself. I have vented my budget, and now good night I I feel almost as if I could walk up to bed. TO MISS BERRY. Strawberry Hill, Saturday night, July 3, 1790. How kind to write the very moment you arrived ! but pray do not think that, welcome as your letters are, I would purchase them at the price of any fatigue to you — a proviso I put in already against moments when you may be more weary than by a journey to Lymington. You make me happy by the good accounts of Miss Agnes ; and I should be completely so, if the air of the sea could be so beneficial to you both, as to make your farther journey unnecessary to your healths, at least for some time ; for — and I protest solemnly that not a personal thought enters into the con sideration — I shall be excessively alarmed at your going to the Continent when such a phrenzy has seized it. You see by the papers, that the flame has burst out at Florence : can Pisa then be secure? Flanders can be no safe road; and is any part of France so? I told you in my last of the horrors at Avignon. At Madrid the people are riotous against the war with us, and prosecuted I am persuaded it will not be; but the demon of Gaul is busy everywhere. The Etats, who are as foolish as atrocious, have printed hsts of the surnames which the late noblesse are to assume or resume; as if people did not know their own names. I hke a speech I have heard of the Queen. She went with the King to see the manufacture of glass, and, as they passed the Halles, the poissardes huzzaed them ; « Upon my word," said the Queen, " these folks are civiler when you visit them, than when they visit you." This marked both spirit and good-humour. For my part I am so shocked at French bar barity, that I begin to think that our hatred of them is not 1790. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 363 national prejudice, but natural instinct ; as tame animals are bom with an antipathy to beasts of prey. Mrs. Damer tells me in a letter to-day, that Lady Ailes bury was charmed with you both (which did not surprise either of us); and says she never saw two persons have so much taste for the country, who have no place of their own. It may be so ; but, begging her ladyship's pardon and yours, I think that people who have a place of their own, are mighty apt not to like any other. I feel aU the kindness at your determination of coming to Twickenham in August and shall certainly say no raore against it, though I ara certain that I shall count every day that passes ; and when they are passed, they will leave a me lancholy impression on Strawberry, that I had rather have affixed to London. The two last summers were infinitely the pleasantest I ever passed here, for I never before had an agreeable neighbourhood. Still I loved the place, and had no comparisons to draw. Now, the neighbourhood wiU re main, and will appear ten times worse ; with the aggravation of remerabering two months that may have some transient roses, but, I am sure, lasting thorns. You tell me I do not write with my usual spirits: at least I will suppress, as much as I can, the want of them, though I am a bad dis sembler.* You do not mention the cathedral at Winchester, which I have twice seen and admired; nor do you say anything of Bevismount and Netley — charming Netley! At Lyndhurst you passed the palatial hovel of my royal nephew; who I have reason to wish had never been so, and did aU I could to prevent his being. The week before last I met the Marlboroughs at Lady Di's. The Duchess'' desired to come and see Strawberry * In a letter written in this month to Walpole, Miss More asks, " Where and how are the Berrys ? I hope they are within reach of your great chair, if you are confined, and of your airings, if you go abroad. I hate their going to Yorkshire ; as Hotspur says, ' What do they do in the north, when they ought to be in the south ? ' " Memoirs, vol. il. p. 235.— E. ' Lady Caroline RusseU; married, in 1762, to the Duke of Marl borough. 364 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1790. again, as it had rained the whole time she was here last I proposed the next morning : no, she could not ; she expected company to dinner; she behoved their brother. Lord Ro bert* would dine with them : I thought that a little odd, as they have just turned him out for Oxfordshire ; and I thought a dinner no cause at the distance of four miles. In her grace's dawdhng way, she could fix no time: and so on Friday, at half an hour after seven, as I was going to Lady North's, they arrived ; and the sun being setting, and the moon not risen, you may judge how much they could see through all the painted glass by twilight. TO THE HON. H. S. CONWAY. Strawberry HiU, August 9, at night, 1790. Mr. Nicholls has offered to be postman to you ; where of, though I have nothing, or as little as nothing, to say, I thought as how it would look kinder to send nothing in writ ing than by word of mouth. Nothing the first. So the peace is made, and the stocks drank its health in a bumper ; but when they waked the next morning, they found they had reckoned without their host, and that their majesties the King of big Britain and the King of little Spain have agreed to make peace some time or other, if they can agree upon it ; and so the stocks drew in their horns : but having great trust in sorae time or other, they only fell two pegs lower. I, who never believed there would be war, keep my prophetic stocks up to par, and my consol — ation still higher; for when Spanish pride truckles, and English pride has had the honour of bullying, I dare to say we shall be content with the ostensible triumph, as Spain will be with some secret article that will leave her rauch where she was before. Vide Falkland's Island. Nothing the second. Miss Gunning's match with Lord Blandford. You asserted it so peremptorily, that . though I doubted it, I quoted you. Lo ! it took its rise solely in ' Lord Robert Spencer, brother of the Duke of Marlborough. 1790. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 365 poor old Bedford's dotage, that still harps on conjunctions copulative, but now disavows it, as they say, on a remon strance from her daughter. Nothing the third. Nothing will come of nothing, says King Lear, and your hurable servant. TO THE EARL OF STRAFFORD. Strawberry HiU, August 12, 1790. I MUST not pretend any longer, ray dear lord, that this region is void of news and diversions. Oh ! we can innovate as well as neighbouring nations. If an Earl Stanhope, though he cannot be a tribune, is ambitious of being a plebeian, he may without a law be as vulgar as heart can wish ; and, though we have not a national assembly to lay the axe to the root of nobility, the peerage have got a precedent for laying themselves in the kennel. Last night the Earl of Barrymore was so humble as to perform a buffoon- dance and act Scaramouch in a pantorairae at Richmond for the benefit of Edwin, jun. the comedian : * and I, hke an old fool, but calling myself a philosopher that loves to study human nature in all its disguises, went to see the performance. Mr. Gray thinks that some Milton or some Cromwell raay be lost to the world under the garb of a ploughraan. Others may suppose that some excellent jack-pudding may lie hidden under red velvet and ermine. I cannot say that by the ex periment of last night the latter hypothesis has been de monstrated, any more than the inverse proposition in France, where, though there seem to be raany as bloody-minded rascals as Cromwell, I can discover none of his abilities.'^ ' In the foUowing month " The FoUies of a Day " was performed at Lord Barrymore's private theatre, at Wergrave. " His lordship, in the character of the gardener," according to the newspapers, " was highly comic, and his humour was not overstrained : the whole concluded with a dance, in which was introduced a favourite pa.s Russe, by Lord Barry more and Mr. Delpini, which kept the theatre in a roar." — E. ' Gibbon, in a letter written a few months before from Lausanne to Lord Sheffield, makes the foUowing reflections : — " The French nation 366 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1790. They have settled nothing like a constitution; on the con trary, they seem to protract everything but violence, as much as they can, in order to keep their louis a day, which is more than two-thirds of the Assembly perhaps ever saw in a month. I do not love legislators that pay themselves so amply ! They might have had as good a constitution as twenty-four mUlions of people could comport As they have voted an army of an hundred and fifty thousand men, I know what their con stitution wiU be, after passing through a civU war. In short I detest them : they have done irreparable injury to liberty, for no monarch wUl ever summon etats again; and all the real service that will result from their fury wUl be, that every King in Europe, for these twenty or perhaps thirty years to corae, will be content with the prerogative he has, without venturing to augment it. The Empress of Russia has thrashed the King of Sweden ; and the King of Sweden has thrashed the Empress of Russia. I am more glad that both are beaten than that either is victo rious ; for I do not hhe our newspapers, and such admirers, fall in love with heroes and heroines who raake war without a glimpse of provocation. I do like our making peace, whe ther we had provocation or not I am forced to deal in Eu ropean news, my dear lord, for I have no homespun. I don't think my whole inkhorn could invent another paragraph ; and therefore I will take ray leave, with (your lordship knows) every kind wish for your health and happiness.* had a glorious opportunity, but they have abused and may lose their advantages. If they had been content with a liberal translation of our system, if they had respected the prerogatives of the crown and the pri vUeges of the nobles, they might have raised a solid fabric on the only true foundation, the natural aristocracy of a great country. How dif ferent is the prospect! Their King brought a captive to Paris, after his palace had been stained with the blood of his guards ; the nobles in exile ; the clergy plundered in a way which strikes at the root of all property; the capital an independent republic; the union of the pro vinces dissolved ; the flames of discord kindled by the worst of men, and the honestest of the Assembly a set of wild visionaries. As yet there is no symptom of a great man, a Richelieu or a Cromwell, arising, either to restore the monarchy, or to lead the commonwealth." — E. ' This appears to have been the last letter addressed by Walpole to the Earl of Strafford. His lordship died at Wentworth Castle, on the loth of March following, in his seventy-ninth year. — E. 1790. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 367 TO SIR DAVID DALRYMPLE.* Strawberry HUl, Sept. 21, 1790. So many years. Sir, have elapsed since I saw Burleigh, that I cannot in general pretend to recoUect the pictures well. I do remember that there was a surfeit of pieces by Luca Jordano and Carlo Dolce, no capital masters, and posterior to the excellent The Earl of Exeter, who resided long at Rome in the time of those two painters, seemed to have employed them entirely during his sojourn there. I was not struck raore than you. Sir, with the celebrated Death of Seneca, though one of the best works of Jordano. Perhaps Prior's verses hfted it to part of its farae, though even those verses are inferior to many of that charming poet's composi tions. Upon the whole, Burleigh is a noble palace, contains many fine things, and the inside court struck rae with ad miration and reverence. The Shakspeare Gallery is truly most inadequate to its prototypes ; but how should it be worthy of them ! If we could recall the brightest luminaries of painting, could they do justice to Shakspeare? Was Raphael himself as great a genius in his art as the author of Macbeth ? and who could draw Falstaffe, but the writer of Falstaffe ? I am entirely of your opinion. Sir, that two of Northcote's pictures, from King John and Richard the Third, are at the head of the coUection. In Macklin's Gallery of Poets and Scripture, there are much better pictures than at Boydell's. Opie's Jepthah's Vow is a truly fine perforraance, and would be so in any asserablage of paintings; as Sir Joshua's Death of Beaufort is worthy of none : the Imp is burlesque, and the Cardinal seems terrified at him as before him, when the Imp is behind him. In Sir Thomas Hanmer's edition there is a print that gives the fact siraply, pathetically, and with dignity, and just as you wish it told. My sentiments on French politics concur as much with yours as they do on the subjects above. The National As- ' Now first coUected. 368 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1790. serably set out too absurdly and extravagantly, not to throw their country into the last confusion ; which is not the way of correcting a government, but raore probably of producing a worse, bad as the old was, and thence they will have given a lasting wound to liberty : for what king will ever call Etats again, if he can possibly help it ? The new legislators were pedants, not politicians, when they announced the equality of all men. We are all born so, no doubt abstractedly ; and phy sically capable of being kept so, were it possible to establish a perfect government, and give tbe same education to all men. But are they so in the present constitution of society, under a bad government, where raost have had no education at all, but have been debased, brutified, by a long train and mixture of superstition and oppression, and witnesses to the luxury and vices of their superiors, which they could only envy and not enjoy ? It was turning tigers loose ; and the degradation of the nobility pointed out the prey. Could it be expected that savages so hallooed on to outrage and void of any notions of reciprocal duties and obhgations, would fall into a regular system of acting as citizens under the government of reason and justice ? It was tearing all the bonds of society, which the experience of mankind had taught them were necessary to the mutual convenience of all ; and no provision, no security, was made for those who were levelled, and who, though they enjoyed what they had by the old constitution, were treated, or were exposed to be treated, as criminals. They have been treated so : several have been butchered ; and the National Assembly dare not avenge them, as they should lose the favour of the intoxicated populace. That conduct was senseless, or worse. With no less folly did they seem to expect that a vast body of men, more enlightened, at least, than the gross multitude, would sit down in patience under persecution and deprivation of all they valued ; I mean the nobihty and clergy, who might be stunned, but were sure of reviving and of burning with vengeance. The insult was the greater, as the subsequent conduct of the National Assembly has proved more shamefully dishonest in their paying them selves daily more than two-thirds of them ever saw perhaps in 1790. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 369 a month ; and that flagitious self-bestowed stipend, as it is void of all patriotic integrity, will destroy their power too ; for, if constitution-making is so lucrative a trade, others will wish to share in the plunder of their country too ; and, even with out a civil war, I ara persuaded the present Assembly will neither be septennial, nor even triennial. TO THE MISS BERRYS. Sunday, Oct. 10, 1790. The day of your departure. Is it possible to write to my beloved friends, and refrain from speaking of my grief for losing you; though it is but the continuation of what I have felt ever since I was stunned by your intention of going abroad this autumn ? Still I will not tire you with it often. In happy days I smiled, and called you my dear wives — now I can only think on you as darling chil dren of whom I am bereaved ! As such 1 have loved and do love you ; and, charraing as you both are, I have had no occa sion to remind rayself that I ara past seventy-three. Your hearts, your understandings, your virtues, and the cruel injustice of your fate,* have interested me in everything that concerns you ; and so far from having occasion to blush for any unbecoming weakness, I am proud of my affection for you, and very proud of your condescending to pass so many hours with a very old raan, when everybody admires you, and the most insensible allow that your good sense and informa tion (I speak of both) have formed you to converse with the most intelligent of our sex as well as your own ; and neither can tax you with airs of pretension or affectation. Your sim plicity and natural ease set off all your other merits — all these graces are lost to me, alas ! when I have no time to lose. Sensible as I am to my loss, it will occupy but part of my thoughts, till I know you safely landed, and arrived safely at Turin. Not tUl you are there, and I learn so, will my anxiety ' This aUudes to Miss Berry's father having been disinherited by an uncle, to whom he was heir at law, and a large property left to his younger brother. — M. B. VOL. VI. 2 B 370 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1790. subside and settle into steady, selfish sorrow. I looked at every weather-cock as I came along tbe road to-day, and was happy to see every one point north-east. May they do so to morrow ! I found here the frame for Wolsey, and to-morrow morning Kirgate wiU place him in it; and then I shaU begin pulhng the little parlour to pieces, that it may be hung anew to re ceive him. I have also obeyed Miss Agnes, though with regret; for, on trying it I found her Arcadia* would fit the place of the picture she condemns, which shall therefore be hung in its room ; though the latter should give way to nothing else, nor shall be laid aside, but shall hang where I shall see it almost as often. I long to hear that its dear paintress is well ; 1 thought her not at all so last night. You will tell me the truth, though she in her own case, and in that alone, allows herself mental reservation. Forgive me for writing nothing to-night but about you two and myself. Of what can I have thought else ? I have not spoken to a single person but my own servants since we parted last night. I found a message here from Miss Howe** to invite me for this evening — do you think I have not pre ferred staying at horae to write to you, as this must go to London to-morrow morning by the coach to be ready for Tuesday's post ? My future letters shall talk of other things, whenever I know anything worth repeating ; or perhaps any trifle, for I am determined to forbid myself lamentations that would weary you ; and the frequency of my letters will prove there is no forgetfulness. If I live to see you again, you will then judge whether I am changed ; but a friendship so rational and so pure as mine is, and so equal for both, is not likely to have any of the fickleness of youth, when it has none of its other ingredients. It was a sweet consolation to the short time that I may have left, to fall into such a society ; no won der then that I am unhappy at that consolation being abridged. I pique myself on no philosophy, but what a long use and knowledge of the world had given me — the philosophy of in- * A drawing by Miss Agnes Berry. = Julia Howe, an unmarried sister of Admiral Earl Howe, who lived at Richmond. 1790. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 371 difference to raost persons and events. I do pique myself on not being ridiculous at this very late period of my hfe ; but when there is not a grain of passion in my affection for you two, and when you both have the good sense not to be dis pleased at my telling you so, (though I hope you would have despised me for the contrary,) I am not ashamed to say that your loss is heavy to me ; and that I am only reconciled to it by hoping that a winter in Italy, and the journeys and sea air, will be very beneficial to two constitutions so delicate as yours. Adieu ! my dearest friends : it would be tautology to subscribe a name to a letter, every hne of which would suit no other man in the world but the writer. TO THE MISS BERRYS. Sunday, Oct. 31, 1790. Perhaps I am unreasonably impatient, and expect letters before they can come. I expected a letter from Lyons three days ago, though Mrs. Damer told me I should not have one till to-morrow. I have got one to-day ; but alas I from Pougues only, eleven and a half posts short of Lyons ! Oh ! may Mrs. Damer prove in the right to-morrow ! Well ! I must be happy for the past; and that you had such dehghtful weather, and but one little accident to your carriage. We have had equal summer tiU Wednesday last when it blew a hurricane. I said to it, " Blow, blow, thou winter wind, I don't mind you now !" but I have not forgotten Tuesday the 12th ; and now I hope it will be as calm as it is to-day on Wed nesday next, when Mrs. Damer is to sail.* I was in town on Thursday and Friday, and so were her parents, to take our leaves ; as we did on Friday night, supping all at Richmond- house. She set out yesterday morning, and I returned hither. I am glad you had the amusement of seeing the National As serably. Did Mr. Berry find it quite so august as he intended it should be ? Burke's paraphlet is to appear to-raorrow, and ' Mrs. Damer was going to pass the winter at Lisbon, on account of her health. 2 B 2 372 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1790. Calonne has pubhshed a thumping one of four hundred and forty pages.* I have but begun it for there is such a quantity of calculations, and one is forced to bait so often to boU mil liards of livres down to a rob of pounds steriing, that my head is only fiUed with figures instead of arguments, and I under stand arithmetic less than logic. Our war stiU hangs by a hair, they say ; and that this ap proaching week must terminate its fluctuations. Brabant, I am told, is to be pacified by negociations at the Hague. Though I talk like a newspaper, I do not assume their airs; nor give my intelligence of any sort for authentic, unless when the Gazette endorses the articles. Thus, Lord Louvain is made Earl of Beverley, and Lord, Earl of Digby ; but in no Gazette, though still in the Songs of Sion, do I find that Miss Gunning is a marchioness. It is not that I suppose you care who gains a step in the aristocracy; but I tell you these trifles to keep you au courant, and that at your return you may not make only a baronial curtsey, when it should be lower by two rows of ermine to some new-hatched countess. This is all the news-market furnishes. Your description of the National Asserably and of the Champ de Mars were both admirable ; but the altar of boards and canvass seems a type of their perishable constitution, as their air-balloons were before. French visions are generally full of vapour, and terminate accordingly. I have been at Mrs. GrenviUe's'' this evening, who had a small party for the Duchess of Gloucester : there were many inquiries after my wives. TO THE MISS BERRYS. Park-place, Nov. 8, 1790. No letter since Pougues ! I think you can guess how uneasy I am ! It is not the fault of the wind ; which has • This was his " Lettre sur I'Etat de la France, present et a venir ;" of which a translation appeared in the following year. — E. ' Margaret Banks, widow of the Hon. Henry GrenviUe, who died in 1784. Their only daughter was married, in 1781, to Viscount Mahon, afterwards Earl Stanhope. 1790. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 373 blown from every quarter. To-day I cannot hear, for no post comes in on Mondays. What can have occasioned my re ceiving no letter from Lyons, when, on the 18th of last month, you were within twelve posts of it ? I am now sorry I came hither, lest by my change of place a letter may have shuttle- cocked about, and not have known where to find me ; and yet I left orders with Kirgate to send it after rae, if one carae to Strawberry on Saturday. I return thither to-morrow, but not till after the post is corae in here. I am writing to you now, while the company are walked out to divert my im patience ; which, however, is but a bad recipe, and not exactly the way to put you out of my head. The first and great piece of news is the pacification with Spain. The courier arrived on Thursday morning with a most acquiescent answer to our ultimatum : what that was I do not know, nor much care. Peace contents rae, and for my part I shall not haggle about the terms. I have a good gene ral digestion, and it is not a small raatter that vrill lie at my stomach when I have no hand in dressing the ingredients. The pacification of Brabant is likely to be volume the second. The Emperor, and their Majesties of Great Britain and Prussia, and his Serene Highness the Republic of Hol land have sent a card to his turbulept Lowness of Brabant, that they allow him but three weeks to subrait to his old sovereign ; on proraise of a general pardon — or the choice of threescore thousand raen ready to march without a pardon. The third volume, expected, but not yet in the press, is a counter-revolution in France. Of that I know nothing but rumour; yet it certainly is not the most incredible event that rumour ever foretold. In this country the stock of the National Assembly is fallen down to bankruptcy. Their only renegade, aristocrat Earl Stanhope, has, with ^fW. Russel, scratched his narae out of the Revolution Club ; but the fatal blow has been at last given by Mr. Burke. His pamphlet * came out this day se'nnight and is far superior to what was ' The far-famed " Reflections on the Revolution in France ; " of which about thirty thousand copies were sold in a comparatively short space of time. — £. 374 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1790. expected, even by his warmest admirers. I have read it twice ; and though of three hundred and fifty pages, I wish I could repeat every page by heart It is sublime, profound, and gay. The wit and satire are equaUy briUiant ; and the whole is wise, though in some points he goes too far : yet in general there is far less want of judgment than could be expected frora him. If it could be translated, — which, from the wit and metaphors and allusions, is almost impossible, — I should think it would be a classic book in all countries, except in present France.* To their tribunes it speaks daggers ; though, unlike them, it uses none. Seven thousand copies have been taken off by the booksellers already, and a new edition is preparing. I hope you will see it soon. There ends my gazette. There is nobody here at present but Mrs. Hervey, Mrs. E. Hervey, and Mrs. Cotton : but what did I find on Saturday ? Why, the Prince of Furstemberg,^ his son, and son's go vernor ! I was ready to turn about and go back ; but they really proved not at all unpleasant The ambassador has not the least German stiffness or hauteur; is extremely civil, and so domestic a man, that he talked comfortably of his wife and eight children, and of his fondness for them. He under stands English, though he does not speak it The son, a good-humoured lad of fifteen, seems well-informed : the go vernor, a middle-aged ofiicer, speaks Enghsh so perfectly, that even by his accent I should not have discovered him for a foreigner. They stayed all night and went to Oxford next morning before I rose. November 9th, at night. This morning, before I left Park-place, I bad the relief and joy of receiving your letter of October 24, from Lyons. It would have been stiU more welcorae, if dated from Turin; * A French translation, by M. Dupont, shortly after made its appear ance, and spread the reputation of the work over aU Europe. The Em peror of Germany, Catherine of Russia, and the French Princes trans- mitted to Mr. Burke their warm approbation of it, and the unfortunate Stanislaus of Poland sent him his likeness on a gold medal. E 2 The Landgrave of Furstemberg had been sent from' the" Emperor Leopold to notify his being elected Kmg of the Romans, and his subse quent coronation as Emperor of Germany. — E. 1790. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 375 but as you have met with no impediments so far, I trust you got out of France as well as through it. I do hope, too, that Miss Agnes is better, as you say; but when one is very anxious about a person, credulity does not take long strides in proportion. I am not surprised at your finding voiturins, or anybody, or anything, dearer : where all credit and all control are swept away, every man will be a tyrant in proportion to his necessities and his strength. Societies were invented to temperate force : but it seems force was liberty, and much good may it do the French with being delivered from everything but violence ! — which I believe they will soon taste pro and con. ! You make me smile by desiring me to continue my affec tion. Have I so much time left for inconstancy ? For three score years and ten I have not been very fickle in my friend ships : in all those years I never found such a pair as you and your sister. Should I meet with a superior pair, — but they must not be deficient in any one of the qualities which I find in you two, — why, perhaps, I may change; but, with that double mortgage on my affections, I do not think you are in much danger of losing them. You shall have tiraely notice if a second couple drops out of the clouds and falls in my way. TO MISS BERRY. November 11, 1790. I HAD a letter from Mrs. Damer at Falmouth. She suf fered much by cold and fatigue, and probably sailed on Satur day evening last, and may be at Lisbon by this time, as you, I trust, are in Italy. Mr. Burke's pamphlet has quite turned Dr. Price's head. He got upon a table at their club, toasted to our Parliaraent becoming a National Asserably, and to admitting no more peers of their assembly, having lost the only one they had. They themselves are very like the French Etats : two more members got on the table (their pulpit), and broke it down: — so be it! 376 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1790. The Marquisate * is just where it was — to be and not to be. The Duchess of Argyll is said to be worse. Delia Crusca* has published a poem, called " The Laurel of Liberty," which, like the Enrages, has confounded and overturned all ideas. There are gossamery tears and silky oceans — the first time, to be sure, that anybody ever cried cobwebs, or that the sea was made oi paduasoy.^ There is, besides, a violent tirade against a considerable personage, who, it is supposed, the author was jealous of, as too much favoured a few years ago by a certain Countess. You may guess why I am not more explicit: for the same reason I beg you not to mention it at all ; it would be exceedingly improper. As the Parliament will meet in a fortnight, and the town be plumper, my letters may grow more amusing ; though, unless the weather grows worse, I shall not contribute my leanness to its embonpoint. Adieu ! TO THE MISS BERRYS. Strawberry HUl, Thursday, Nov. 18, 1790. On Tuesday raorning, after my letter was gone to the post, I received yours of the 2d (as I have all the rest) from Turin, and it gave me very little of the joy I had so much meditated to receive from a letter thence. And why did not it?— because I had got one on Saturday, which anticipated and augmented aU the satisfaction I had aUotted for Turin, ' Meaning the reported marriage of Miss Gunning to the Marquis of Blandford. — B. ^ ^ Robert Merry, Esq. who, at this time, wrote in the newspapers under this signature, and thereby became the object of the caustic satire of the author of the Baviad aud Maeviad — " Lo, Delia Crusca ! in his closet pent. He toils to give the crude conception vent : Abortive thoughts, that right and wrong confound Truth sacrific'd to letters, sense to sound ¦ ' False glare, incongruous images combine,' And noise and nonsense clatter through the Une." E. ' Besides the above, Mr. Gifford instances, from the same poem, « moody monarchs, radiant rivers, cooUng cataracts, lazy Loires gay Garonnes, glossy glass, mingling murder, dauntless day, lettered liffhfr. nings, delicious dilatings, sinking sorrows, real reasoning, meUorSine mercies, dewy vapours damp that sweep the sUent swamps" &c &c"— E 1790. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 377 You will find my Tuesday's letter, if ever you receive it, intoxicated with Chamberry; for which, and all your kind punctuality, I give you a million of thanks. But how cruel to find that you found none of my letters at Turin ! There ought to have been two at least, of October the 16th and 19th. I have since directed one thither of the 25th; but, alas ! from ignorance, there was par Paris on none of them; and the Lord knows at how many little Ger man courts they may have been baiting ! I shall put par Paris on this; but beg you will tell me, as soon as you can, which route is the shortest and the safest; that is, by which you are most likely to receive them. You do me justice in concluding there has been no negligence of mine in the case ; indeed, I have been ashamed at the multiphcity of my letters, when I had scarce anything to tell you but my own anxiety to hear of your being quietly settled at Florence, out of the reach of all commotions. And how could I but dread your being molested by some accident, in the present state of France? and how could your healths mend in bad inns, and till you can repose somewhere? Repose you will have at Florence, but I shall fear the winter for you there : I suffered raore by cold there, than by any place in my life; and never came home at night without a pain in ray breast, which I never felt elsewhere, yet then I was very young and in perfect health. If either of you suffer there in any shape, I hope you will retire to Pisa. My inquietude, that presented so raany alarms to me be fore you set out, has, I find, and ara grieved for it, not been quite in the wrong. Some inconveniences I am persuaded you have sunk : yet the diflSculty of landing at Dieppe, and the ransack of your poor harmless trunks at Bourgoin, and the wretched lodgings with which you were forced to take up at Turin, count deeply with me ; and I had much rather have lost all credit as a prophet, since I could not prevent your journey. May it answer for your healths ! I doubt it wiU not in any other respect as you have already found by the voiturins. In point of pleasure, is it possible to divest my self so radically of all self-love as to wish you may find Italy 378 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1790. as agreeable as you did formerly ? In aU other hghts, I do most fervently hope there will be no drawbacks on your plan. Should you be disappointed any way, you know what a warm heart is open to receive you back; and so will your own Cliveden* be too. I am glad you met the Bishop of Arras,*^ and am much pleased that he remembers me. I saw him very frequently at my dear old friend's,^ and liked him the best of all the Frenchmen I ever knew. He is extremely sensible, easy, lively, and void of prejudices. Should he fall in yoitr way again, I beg you will tell him how sincere a regard I have for him. He hved in the strictest union with his brother, the Archbishop of Tours, whom I was much less acquainted with, nor know if he be living. I have heard nothing since my Tuesday's letter. As I still hope its predecessors will reach you, I will not repeat the trifling scraps of news I have sent you in them. In fact, this is only a trial whether par Paris is a better passport than a direction without it ; but I am grievously sorry to find diflBculty of correspondence superadded to the vexation of losing you. Writing to you was grown my chief occupation. I wish Europe and its broils were in the East Indies, if they embarrass us quiet folks, who have nothing to do with their squabbles. The Duchess of Gloucester, who called on me yesterday, charged me to give her compliments to you both. Miss Foldson* has not yet sent me your pictures : I was in town on Monday, and sent to reproach her with having twice broken her promise; her mother told my servant that Miss was at Windsor, drawing the Queen and Princesses. That is not the work of a moment I am glad all the Princes are not on the spot. I think of continuing here till the weather grows very bad; which it has not been at all yet, though not equal to what I am rejoiced you have found. I have no Somerset or ' Little Strawberry HiU, which he had then thus named. ' M. de Conzies. This amiable prelate declined, in 1801, the Parisian archiepiscopacy, proffered him by Buonaparte, and died in London, in December 1804, in the arms of Monsieur, afterwards Charles the Tenth. — E. " Madame du Deffand. " Afterwards Mrs. Mee. 1790. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 379 Audley street to receive me ; Mrs. Damer is gone too. The Conways reraain at Park-place till after Christraas; it is entirely out of fashion for woraen to grow old and stay at home in an evening. They invite you, indeed, now and then, but do not expect to see you till midnight; which is rather too late to begin the day, unless one was born but twenty years ago. I do not condemn any fashions, which the young ought to set for the old certainly ought not; but an oak that has been going on in its old way for an hundred years, cannot shoot into a May-pole in three years, because it is the mode to plant Lombardy poplars. What I should have suffered, if your letters, like mine, had wandered through Germany ! I, you was sure, had written, and was in no danger. Dr, Price, who had whetted his ancient talons last year to no purpose, has had them all drawn by Burke, and the Revolution Club is as much ex ploded as the Cock-lane Ghost ; but you, in order to pass a quiet winter in Italy, would pass through a fiery furnace. Fortunately, you have not been singed, and the letter from Chamberry has coraposed all my panics, but has by no means convinced me that I was not perfectly in the right to endea vour to keep you at home. One does not put one's hand in the fire to burn off a hangnail ; and, though health is delight ful, neither of you were out of order enough to make a rash experiment I would not be so absurd as to revert to old ar guments, that happily proved no prophecies, if my great anxiety about you did not wish, in time, to persuade you to return through Switzerland and Flanders, if the latter is pacified and France is not ; of which I see no likelihood. Pray forgive me, if parts of my letters are sometiraes tire some ; but can I appear only and always cheerful when you two are absent, and have another long journey to make, ay, and the sea to cross again? My fears cannot go to sleep hke a paroli at faro till there is a new deal, in which even then I should not be sure of winning. If I see you again, I will think I have gained another milleleva, as I literally once did ; with this exception, that I was vehemently against risking a doit at the game of travelhng. Adieu ! 380 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1790. TO THE MISS BERRYS. Strawberry HiU, Friday night, Nov. 27, 1790. I AM waiting for a letter from Florence, not with perfect patience, though I could barely have one, even if you did arrive, as you intended, on the 12th ; but twenty temptations might have occurred to detain you in that land of eye and ear sight : my chief eagerness is to learn that you have received at least some of my letters. I wish too to know, though I cannot yet whether you would have me direct par Paris, or as I did before. In this state of uncertainty I did not pre pare this to depart this morning ; nor, though the Parliaraent met yesterday, have I a syllable of news for you, as there will be no debate till all the members have been sworn, which takes two or three days. Moreover, I am still here: the weather, though very rainy, is quite warm ; and I have much more agreeable society at Richmond, with sraall companies and better hours, than in town, and shall have till after Christ mas, unless great cold drives me thither. Lady Di, Selwyn, the Penns, the Onslows, Douglases, Mackinsys, Keenes, Lady Mount-Edgcumbe, all stay, and some of thera raeet every evening. The Boufllers too are constantly invited, and the Comtesse* Emilie sometiraes carries her harp, on which they say she plays better than Orpheus ; but as I never heard him on earth, nor chez Proserpine, I do not pretend to decide. Lord Fitzwilliam* has been here too; but was in the utmost danger of being lost on Saturday night in a violent storm be tween Calais and Dover, as the captain confessed to hira when they were landed. Do you think I did not ache at the recollec tion of a certain Tuesday when you were sailing to Dieppe ? TO MISS AGNES BERRY. Strawberry HiU, Sunday, Nov. 29, 1790. Though I write to both at once, and reckon your letters to corae equally from both, yet I delight in seeing your hand ' Richard, seventh and last Viscount FitzwUUam, the munificent be nefactor to the University of Cambridge. He died in 1816. — E. 1790. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 381 with a pen as well as with a pencil, and you express yourself as well with the one as with the other. Your part in that which I have been so happy as to receive this moment has singularly obhged me, by your having saved me the terror of knowing you had a torrent to cross after heavy rain. No cat is so afraid of water for herself, as I ara grown to be for you. That panic, which will last for many months, adds to my fervent desire of your returning early in the autumn, that you may have neither fresh water nor the " silky" ocean to cross in winter. Precious as our insular situation is, I am ready to wish with the Frenchman, that you could somehow or other get to it by land, — " Oui, c'est une isle toujours, je le s^ais bien ; mais, par exemple, en allant d'alentour, n'y auroit-il pas raoyen d'y arriver par terre?" Correggio never pleased me in proportion to his fame : his grace touches upon grimace; the mouth of the beautiful Angel at Parma curls up almost into a half-moon. Still I prefer Correggio to the laurd want of grace in Guercino, who is to rae a German edition of Guido. I am sorry the book seller would not let you have an Otranto. Edwards told me, above two months ago, that he every day expected the whole impression; and he has never mentioned it waiting for my corrections. I will make Kirgate write to him, for I have told you that I am still here. We have had much rain, but no flood; and yesterday and to-day have exhibited Florentine skies. From town I know nothing; but that on Friday, after the King's speech. Earl Stanhope made a most frantic speech on the National Assembly and against Calonne's book, which he wanted to have taken up for high treason.* He was every minute interrupted by loud bursts of laughter ; which was all the answer he received or deserved. His suffragan Price has ' In the report of Lord Stanhope's speech, as it is given in the ParUa mentary History, there is no expression of a wish that M. Calonne should be " taken up for high treason." What the noble Earl said was, that the assertion that a civU war would meet with the support of aU the crowned heads in Europe, was a scandalous libel on the King of Eng land, and might endanger the Uves of many natives of Scotland and Ire land then residing in France. — E. 382 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1790. pubhshed a short sneaking equivocal answer to Burke, in which he pretends his triumph over the King of France alluded to July, not to October, though his sermon was preached in November. Credat — but not Judseus ApeUa, as Mr. Burke so wittily says of the assignats.* Mr. GrenviUe, the secretary of state, is made a peer, they say to assist the Chancellor in the House of Lords : yet tbe papers pretend the Chancellor is out of humour, and will resign ; the first may be true, tbe latter probably not^ Richmond, my metropolis, flourishes exceedingly. The Duke of Clarence arrived at his palace there last night, be tween eleven and twelve, as I came from Lady Douglas. His eldest brother and Mrs. Fitzherbert dine there to-day with the Duke of Queensbury, as his grace, who called here this morning, told me, on the very spot where lived Charles the First, and where are the portraits of his principal courtiers frora Cornbury. Queensbury has taken to that palace at last, and has frequently corapany and rausic there in an evening. I intend to go. I suppose none of my Florentine acquaintance 'are still upon earth. The handsomest woman there, of my days, was a Madame Grifoni, my fair Geraldine : she would now be a Methusalemess, and much raore like a frightful picture I have of her by a one-eyed German painter. I lived then with Sir Horace Mann, in Casa Mannetti in Via de' Santi Apostoli, by the Ponte di Trinita. Pray, worship the works of Masaccio, if any remain; though I think the best have been burnt in a church. Raphael himself borrowed from him. Fra Bartolomeo, too, is one of my standards for great ideas ; and Benvenuto Cellini's Perseus a rival of the antique, though ' " The Assembly made in their speeches a sort of swaggering decla ration, something, I rather think, above legislative competence ; that is, that there is no difference in value between metallic money and their assignats. This was a good, stout proof article of faith, pronounced under an anathema, by the venerable fathers of this phUosophic synod. Credat who wiU — certainly not Judceus ApeUa." — E. ' In Mr. WUberforce's Diary for this year there appears the following entry :— " Nov. 22. Dined with Mr. Pitt. He told me of GrenvUle's peerage, and the true reasons — distrust of Lord Thurlow. Saw Thur- low's answer to the news. Gave Pitt a serious word or two." See Life, vol. i. p. 284.— E. 1790. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. Mrs. Damer will not allow it. Over against the Perseus is a beautiful small front of a house, with only three windows, designed by Raphael; and another, I think, near the Porta San Gallo, and I believe called Casa Panciatici or Pandolfini. TO THE MISS BERRYS. Strawberry HiU, Dec. 20, 1790 ; very late at night. The French packet that was said to be lost on Tuesday last, and which did hang out signals of distress, was saved, but did not bring any letters; but three Flemish mails that were due are arrived, and did bring letters, and, to my in expressible joy, two from you of the 22nd and 29th of last month, telhng me that you have received as far as No. 4 and 5 of mine. Thank all the stars in Herschell's telescope, or beyond its reach, that our correspondence is out of the reach of France and all its ravages ! Thank you a million of times for all your details about yourselves ! When even the appre hension of any danger disquiets me so much, judge whether I do not interest myself in every particular of your pleasures and arauseraents ! Florence was my delight, as it is yours ; but, I don't know how, I wish you did not like it quite so much ! and, after the gallery, how will any silver-penny of a gallery look ? Indeed, for your Boboli, which I thought hor rible even fifty years ago, before shepherds had seen the star of taste in the west, and glad tidings were proclaimed to their flocks, I do think there is not an acre on the banks of the Thames that should vail the bonnet to it. Of Mr. Burke's book, if I have not yet told you my opinion, I do now ; that it is one of the finest compositions in print. There is reason, logic, wit, truth, eloquence, and enthusiasm in the brightest colours. That it has given a mortal stab to sedition, I believe and hope ; because the fury of the Brabant ers, — whom, however, as having been aggrieved, I pitied and distinguish totally from the savage Gauls, — and the unmiti gated and execrable injustices of the latter, have raade alraost any state preferable to such anarchy and desolation, that in- 384 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. creases every day. Admiring thus, as I do, I am very far from subscribing to the extent of almost aU Mr. Burke's prin ciples. The work, I have no doubt wiU hereafter be apphed to support very high doctrines ; and to you I will say, that I think it an Apocrypha, that, in many a council of Bishops, wiU be added to the Old Testament. Still, such an Alman- zor was wanting at this crisis ; and his foes show how deeply they are wounded, by their abusive pamphlets. Their Ama zonian aUies, headed by Kate Macaulay* and the virago Bar- bauld, whom Mr. Burke calls our poissardes, spit their rage at eighteen-pence a head, and wUl return to Fleet-ditch, more fortunate in being forgotten than their predecessors, immor talized in the Dunciad. I must now bid you good-night; and night it is, to the tune of morning. Adieu, all three ! TO MISS BERRY. Berkeley Square, Saturday, Jan. 22, 1791. I HAVE been raost unwillingly forced to send you such bad accounts of myself by my two last letters ; but, as I could not conceal all, it was best to tell you the whole truth. Though I do not know that there was any real danger, I could not be so blind to my own age and weakness as not to think that, with so much gout and fever, the conclusion might very probably be fatal ; and therefore it was better you should be prepared for what might happen. The danger ap pears to be entirely over : there seems to be no more gout to come. I have no fever, have a very good appetite, and sleep well. Mr. Watson,'^ who is all tenderness and attention, is persuaded to-day that I shall recover the use of my left hand ; of which I despaired much more than of the right, as having been seized three weeks earher. Emaciated and altered I am incredibly, as you would find were you ever to see me again. But this iUness has dispelled all visions ; and, as I have little ' A pamphlet, entitled " Observations on the Reflections of the Right Hon. Edmund Burke on the Revolution in France ; in a Letter to Earl Stanhope," was attributed to Mrs. Macaulay. — ^E. ^ His surgeon. 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 387 prospect of passing another happy auturan, I must wean my self from whatever would embitter my remaining time by dis* appointments. Your No. 15 came two days ago, and gives me the plea sure of knowing that you both are the better for riding, which I hope you will continue. I am glad, too, that you are pleased with your Duchess of Fleury and your Latin pro fessor; but I own, except your climate and the six hundred camels, you seem to me to have met with no treasure which you might not have found here without going twenty miles : and even the camels, according to Soame Jenyns' spelling, were to be had from Carrick and other places. I doubt you apply Tully de Amicitia too favourably : at least, I fear there is no paragraph that countenances 73 and 27. Monday, the 24th. I think I shall give you pleasure by telling you that I am very sure now of recovering from the present fit. It has almost always happened to rae, in my considerable fits of the gout, to have one critical night that celebrates its departure : at the end of two different fits I each tirae slept eleven hours. Morpheus is not quite so young nor so generous now ; but with the interruption of a few minutes, he presented me with eight hours last night : and thence I shall date ray recovery. I shall now begin to let in a little company ; and, as the Parliament will raeet in a week, my letters wUl probably not be so dull as they have been ; nor shall I have occasion, nor be obliged, to talk so much of myself, of which I am sure others must be tired, when I am so much tired myself. Tuesday, the 2Sth. Old Mrs. French * is dead at last, and I am on the point of losing, or have lost, my oldest acquaintance and friend, George Selwyn, who was yesterday at the extremity. These misfortunes, though they can be so but for a short tirae, are very sensible to the old ; but him I really loved, not only for ' An Irish lady, who, during the latter part of her life, had a country house at Hampton Court. VOL. VI. 2 C 386 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. his infinite wit but for a thousand good quahties. Lady Cecilia Johnstone was here yesterday. I said much for you, and she as much to you. The Gunnings are still playing the fool, and perhaps somebody with them ; but I cannot tell you the particulars now. Adieu ! TO THE MISS BERRYS. Saturday, Jan. 29, 1791. Voici de ma propre ecriture ! the best proof that I am recovering, though not rapidly, which is not the march of my time of life. For these last six days I have mended raore than I expected. My left hand, the first seized, is the most dilatory, and of which I have least hopes. The rheumatism, that I thought so clear and predominant, is so entirely gone, that I now rather think it was hussar-gout attacking in fiying squadrons the outposts. No matter which, very ill I was; and you might see what I thought of myself: nor can I stand many such victories. My countenance was so totally altered, that I could not trace it myself. Its outlines have returned to their posts, though with deep gaps. This is a true picture, and too long an one of self; and too hideous for a bracelet Apropos, your sweet Miss Foldson, I believe, is painting por traits of all our Princesses, to be sent to all the Princes upon earth ; for, though I have sent her several written duns, she has not deigned even to answer one in writing. I don't know whether Mrs. BuUer is not appointed Royal Academician too ; for, though I desired the " Charming-man," who was to dine with her that day, to tell her, above a week ago, that I should be glad to see her, she has not taken the least notice of it. Mr. Batt ditto ; who was at Cambridge's when I was at the worst, and knew so, has not once inquired after me, in town or country. So you see you have carried off your friends frora rae as well as yourselves : and it is not them I regret ; or rather, in fact, I outhve all my friends ! Poor Selwyn is gone, to my sorrow; and no wonder Ucalegon feels it !* He * This celebrated wit and amiable man died on the 25th of January 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 387 has left about thirty thousand pounds to Mademoiselle Fag niani ; * twenty of which, if she has no children, to go to those of Lord Carlisle : the Duke of Queensberry residuary legatee. Old French has died as foolishly as she lived, and left six thousand pounds to you don't know whom ; but to be raised out of her judicious collection of trumpery pictures, &c. Pray, delight in the following story : Caroline Vernon, fille d^honneur, lost t'other night two hundred pounds at faro, and bade Martindale mark it up. He said he had rather have a draft on her banker. " Oh ! willingly ;" and she gave him one. Next morning he hurried to Druramond's, lest all her money should be drawn out " Sir," said the clerk, " would you re ceive the contents immediately?" "Assuredly." "Why, Sir, have you read the note ?" Martindale took it ; it was, " Pay to the bearer two hundred blows, well applied." The nymph tells the story herself; and yet I think the clerk had the raore humour of the two. The Gunninghiad^ draws to a conclusion. The General, a few weeks ago, to prove the equality of his daughter to any match, literally put into the newspapers, that he himself is the thirty-second descendant in a line from Charlemagne; — oui, vraiment! Yet he had better have, like Prior's Madara, " To cut things short, gone up to Adam." in his seventy-second year. He was member for LuggershaU, surveyor- general of the crown lands, surveyor of the meltings and clerk of the irons in the Mint ; " and," add the newspapers of the day, " receiver- general of waif and stray jokes." The following tribute to his memory appeared at the time : — " If, this gay Fav'rite lost, they yet can live, A tear to Selwyn let the Graces give ! With rapid kindness teach Oblivion's paU O'er the sunk foibles of the man to faU ; And fondly dictate to a faithful Muse The prime distinction of the Friend they lose : — 'Twas Social Wit ; which, never kindling strife, Blaz'd in the small, sweet courtesies of life ; Those little sapphires round the diamond shone. Lending soft radiance to the richer stone." — E. ' Married, in 1798, to the Earl of Yarmouth ; who, in 1822, succeeded his father as third Marquis of Hertford. — ^E. ' Meaning the strange, imagined history of a marriage supposed to have been Ukely to take place between Miss Gunning and the Marquis of Blandford. 2c 2 388 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. However, this Carlovingian hero does not allow that the let ters are forgeries, and rather suspects the novelist, his lady,* for the authoress ; and if she is, probably Miss Charlemagne is not quite innocent of the plot : though she still maintains that her mother-in-law elect did give her much encourage ment ; which, considering her grace's conduct about her chil dren, is not the most incredible part of this strange story. I have written this at twice, and will now rest Sunday evening. I wish that complaining of people for abandoning me were an infallible recipe for bringing them back! but I doubt it will not do in acute cases. To-day, a ,few hours after writing the latter part of this, appeared Mr. Batt. He asked many pardons, and I easily forgave him; for the mortification was not begun. He asked much after you both. I had a crowd of visits besides; but they all come past two o'clock, and sweep one another away before any can take root My evenings are solitary enough, for I ask nobody to come ; nor, indeed, does anybody's evening begin till I ara going to bed. I have outlived daylight, as well as my cotemporaries. What have I not survived? The Jesuits and the monarchy of France ! and both without a struggle ! Semiramis seems to intend to add Constantinople to the mass of revolutions ; but is not her permanence almost as wonderful as the contrary explosions ! I wish — I wish we may not be actually flip- pancying ourselves into an embroil with that Ursa-major of the North Pole. What a vixen little island are we, if we fight with the Aurora Borealis and Tippoo Saib at the end of Asia at the same time ! You, damsels, wiU be like the end of the conundrum, "¦ You 've seen the man who saw these wondrous sights." Monday evening. I cannot finish this with my own hand, for the gout has returned a httle into my right arm and wrist and I am not > Mrs. Gunning was a Miss Minifie, of Fairwater, Somersetshire, and before her marriage had published several popular novels. E. 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 389 quite so well as I was yesterday ; but I had said my say, and have little to add. The Duchess of Gordon, t'other night, coming out of an assembly, said to Dundas, " Mr. Dundas, you are used to speak in public ; will you call my servant ?" Here I receive your long letter of the 7th, 9th, and 10th, which it is impossible for me to answer now : there is one part to which I wish to reply, but must defer till next post by which time I hope to have recovered my own pen. You ask about the house of Argyll. You know I have no con nexion with them, nor any curiosity about them. Their re lations and mine have been in town but four days, so I know little from them : Mrs. GrenviUe, to-day, told me the Duke proposes to continue the same life he used to lead, with a cribbage-table and his family. Everybody admires tbe youngest daughter's * person and understanding. Adieu ! I will begin to write again rayself as soon as I catn. TO MISS BERRY. Berkeley Square, Friday, Feb. 4, 1791. Last post I sent you as cheerful a letter as I could, to convince you that I was recovering. This will be less gay ; not because I have had a little return in both arms, but be cause I have rauch more pain in my raind than in my limbs. I see and thank you for all the kindness of your inten tion ; but, as it has the contrary effect from what you expect, I am forced, for my own peace, to beseech you not to con tinue a manoeuvre that only tantalizes and wounds me. In your last you put together many friendly words to give me hopes of your return; but can I be so blind as not to see that they are vague words ? Did you mean to return in au tumn, would you not say so ? would the most artful arrange raent of words be so kind as those few simple ones ? In fact, I have for some time seen how httle you mean it ; and, for your sakes, I cease to desire it. The pleasure you expressed ' Lady Charlotte-Susan-Maria ; married, first to Colonel John Camp beU of Islay, and secondly to the Rev. Mr. Bury. — E. 390 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. at seeing Florence again, forgive me for saying, is the joy of sight merely ; for can a httle Itahan town, and wretched Ita lian company, and travelhng Enghsh lads and governors, be comparable to the choice of the best company of so vast a capital as London, unless you have taken an aversion to England? And your renewed transports at a less and stiU more insipid town, Pisa ! These plainly told me your thoughts, which vague words cannot efface. You then dropped that you could let your London house till next Christmas, and then talked of a visit to Switzerland, and since all this, Mrs. Damer has warned me not to expect you till next spring. I shall not; nor do I expect that next spring. I have little expected this next ! My dearest Madam, I allow all my folly and unreasonableness, and give them up and abandon them totally. I have most impertinently and ab surdly tried, for my own sake merely, to exact frora two young ladies, above forty years younger than myself, a pro mise of sacrificing their rooted inclinations to my whims and satisfaction. But my eyes are opened, my reason is re turned, I condemn myself; and I now make you but one request, which is, that though I am convinced it would be with the most friendly and good-natured meaning possible, I do implore you not to try to help me to delude myself any more. You never knew half the shock it gave me when I learned from Mr. Batt what you had concealed frora me, your fixed resolution of going abroad last October ; and though I did in vain deprecate it, — your coming to Twickenham in September, which I know, and from my inmost soul believe, was from mere compassion and kindness to me, — yet it did aggravate my parting with you. I would not repeat all this, but to prevail with you, while I do live, and while you do condescend to have any friend ship for me, never to let me deceive myself I have no right to inquire into your plans, views, or designs ; and never will question you more about them. I shall deserve to be deluded if I do ; but what you do please to say to me, I beg may be frank. I am, in every light too weak to stand dis appointment now : I cannot be disappointed. You have a 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 391 firmness that nothing shakes; and, therefore, it would be unjust to betray your good-nature into any degree of in sincerity. You do nothing that is not reasonable and right ; and I am conscious that you bore a thousand times more from my self-love and vanity, than any other two persons but yourselves would have supported with patience so long. Be assured that what I say I think, feel, and mean : derange none of your plans for me. I now wish you to take no one step but what is conformable to your views, interest, and satisfaction. It would hurt me to interfere with them : I re proach myself with having so ungenerously tried to lay you under any diflSculties, and I approve your resolution in ad hering steadily to your point. Two posts ago I hinted that I was weaning myself from the anxiety of an attachment to two persons that raust have been so uneasy to them, and has ended so sorrowfully to rayself; but that anxiety I restrict solely to the desire of your return: my friendship, had I years to live, could not alter or be shaken ; and there is no kind of proof or instance of it that I will not give you both, while I have breath. I have vented what I had at my heart, and feel relieved. Do not take ill a word I have said. Be assured I can love you as much as ever I did, and do ; though I am no longer so unjust as to prefer my own satisfaction to yours. Here I drop the subject : before Tuesday, perhaps, I shall be able to talk on some other. Monday, 7th. Though the Parliament is met, and the town, they say, full, I have not heard a tittle of news of any sort ; and yet my prison is a coffee-house in a morning, though I have been far from well this whole week. Yesterday and Saturday the gout was so painful in ray right shoulder, that I could not stoop or turn round. To-day it is in my left elbow, and, I doubt, coming into my right foot: in short, it seems to be going its circle over again. I am not very sorry ; sufferings reconcile'one to parting with one's self. One of our nuraerous terapests threw down Mrs. Daraer's chiraney last week, and it fell through her workshop; but 392 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791- fortunately touched none of her own works, and only broke two or three insignificant casts. I suppose you know she returns through Spain. This minute I have heard that Lord Lothian's daughter. Lady Mary St John, and daughter-in- law of Lady Di. Beauclerc, died yesterday, having been de livered of a fine boy but the day before. As you are curious to know the chief topic of conversation, it is the rival Opera- houses, neither of which are opened yet; both saying the other is falhng down. Taylor has published a pamphlet that does not prove that the Marquis* is the most upright Cham- beriain that ever dropped from the skies, nor that the skies are quite true blue. Adieu! if no postscript to-morrow.— None. TO MISS BERRY. Berkeley Square, Feb. 12, 1791. I HAVE jeceived your two letters of January 17th and 24th with an account of your objects and plans ; and the latter are very much what I expected, as before you receive this you will have seen by my last. No. 18. Indeed, you most kindly offer to break so far into your plan, as to return at the begin ning of next winter ; but as that would, as you say, not only be a sacrifice, but risk your healths, can anything upon earth be more impossible than for me to accept or consent to such a sacrifice ? Were I even in love with one of you, could I agree to it ? and, being only a most zealous friend, do you think I will hear of it ? Should I be a friend at all, if I wished you, for my sake, to travel in winter over mountains, or risk the storms at sea, that I have not forgotten when you went away ? Can I desire you to derange a reasonable plan of economy, that would put you quite at your ease at your return ? Have I any pretensions for expecting, still less for asking, such or any sacrifices ? Have I interested myself in your affairs only to erabarrass thera ? I do, in the most positive and soleran manner, refuse to ac cept the smallest sacrifice of any part of your plan, but the ' Of SaUsbury. 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 393 single point that would be so hard on rae. I will say not a word more on your return, and beg your pardon for having been so selfish as to desire it : my only request now is, that we raay say no more about it. I am grieved that the great distance we are at must make me still receive letters about it for some weeks. I shall not forget how very unreasonable I have been myself; nor shall I try to forget it lest I should be silly again : but I earnestly desire to be totally silent on a sub ject that I have totally abandoned, and which it is not at all improbable I raay never have occasion to renew. I knew the Comte de Coigny* in the year 1766 : he was then lively and jovial. I did not think he would turn out a writer, or even reader ; but he was agreeable. I say nothing on France : you must know as much as I do, and probably sooner. I will only tell you, that my opinion is not altered in a tittle. What will happen I do not pretend to guess; but am tho roughly persuaded that the present system, if it can be called so, cannot take root. The flirts towards anarchy here have no effect at all. Home Tooke before Christmas presented a saucy libel to the House of Commons, as a fietition on his election. The House conteraptuously voted it only frivolous and vexatious, and disappointed him of a ray of martyrdom ; but his fees, &c. wUl cost him three or four hundred pounds, which never go into a mob's calculation of the ingredients of martyrdom.* Monday morning, 14th. I have a story to tell you, much too long to add to this ; which I will send next post, unless I have leisure enough to day, from people that call on me, to finish it to-day, baring be gun it last night; and in that case I wiU direct it to Miss Agnes. Mr. Lysons the clergyman has just been here, and told me of a Welsh sportsman, a Jacobite I suppose, who has very recently had his daughter christened Louisa Victoria Maria Sobieski Foxhunter Moll Boycot The curate of the ' Great-uncle of the present Due de Coigny. 2 On the 5th of February, the committee appointed to try the merits ¦ of the petition, reported it to be frivolous and vexatious. Mr. Burke urged the necessity of taking some step against the author of it ; but the subject was got rid of by a motion for the order of the day.— E. 394 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. minister who baptized her confirmed the truth of it to Mr. Lysons. When Belgiojoso, the Austrian minister, was here, and thought he could write Enghsh, he sent a letter to Miss Kennedy, a woman of tbe town, that began, " My Kennedy PoUy dear girl." Apropos — and not much — pray tell me whether the Cardinal of York caUs himself King ; and whether James the Eighth, Charles the Fourth, or what? TO MISS AGNES BERRY. Feb. 13, 1791. The foUowing narrative, though only the termination of a legend of which you know the foregoing chapters, is too singular and too long to be added to my letter ; and therefore, though you will receive two by the sarae post, you will not re pine. In short, the Gunninghiad is completed — not by a marriage, like other novels of the Minifies.* Voici how the denouement happened. Another supposed love-letter had come frora the Marquis * within these few weeks; which was so iraprobable, that it raised more suspicions, and was more closely examined ; and thence was discovered to have been both altered and inter lined. On this the General sent all the letters down to the Marquis;^ desiring to be certified of their authenticity, or the contrary. I should teU you, that all this has happened since the death of his sister ; who kept up the high tone, and said, her brother was not a man to be trified with. The Marquis imraediately distinguished the two kinds ; owned the few let ters that disclaimed all inclination for Miss Charlemagne, disavowed the rest. Thence fell the General's wrath on his consort; of which I have told you. However, the General and his ducal brother-in-law thought ' The name of the famUy of Mrs. Gunning. See p. 388. ^ George-Spencer Churchill, Marquis of Blandford ; he succeeded his father as fourth Duke of Marlborough in 1817. — E. ' General Gunning was son of John Gunning, Esq. of Castle-Coole, in the county of Roscommon, and brother of the beautiful Miss Gunning, married first, in 1752, to the Duke of Hamilton ; and secondly, in 1759, to the Duke of Argyle. — E. 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 395 it expedient that Miss Charly's character should be cleared as far as possible ; she still maintaining the prodigious encourage ment she had received frora the parents of her intended sposo. She was ordered to draw up a narrative, which should be laid before the Duke of Marlborough ; and, if allowed by him, to be shown for her vindication. She obeyed ; and her former assertions did not suffer by the new statement But one sin gular circumstance was added: she confessed — ingenuous maid! — that, though she had not been able to resist so dazzling an offer, her heart was still her cousin's, the other Marquis.* Well ! this narrative, after being laid before a confidential junto at Argyll-house, was sent to Blenheim by the Gene ral, by his own groom. Judge of the astonishment of the junto, when Carloman, almost as soon as was possible, laid before thera a short letter from the Prince of Mindleheim,* de claring how delighted he and his Princess had been at their son's having made choice of so beautiful and amiable a virgin for his bride; how greatly they had encouraged the match; and how chagrined they were, that, from the lightness and in constancy of his temper, the proposed alliance was quite at an end. This wonderful acquittal of the damsel the groom de posed he had received in half-an^haur after his arrival at Blen heim ; and he gave the most natural and unembarrassed ac count of all the stages he had raade, going and coraing. You may still suspect, and so did some of the council, that every tittle of this report and of the letter were not gospel : though I own, I thought the epistle not irreconcilable to other parts of the conduct of their graces about their children. Still, I defy you to guess a thousandth part of the marvellous explanation of the mystery. The first circumstance that struck was, that the Duke, in his own son's name, had forgotten the d in the middle. That was possible in the hurry of doing justice. Next, the wax ' George-William Campbell, Marquis of Lorn. He succeeded his father as sixth Duke of Argyle in 1806. — E. ' The Emperor Joseph, in 1705, bestowed on the great Duke of Marl borough the principaUty of Mindleheim, in Suabia. — E. 396 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. was black; and nobody could discover for whom such illus trious personages were in mourning. Well; that was no proof one way or other. Unluckily, somebody suggested that Lord Henry Spencer was in town, though to return the next day to Holland. A messenger was sent to him, though very late at night, to beg he would repair to Argyll-house. He did : the letter was shown to him ; he laughed, and said it had not the least resemblance to the father's hand. This was negative detection enough ; but now comes the most positive and won derful unravelling ! The next day the General received a letter from a gentle man, confessing that his wife, a friend of Miss Charly, had lately received from her a copy of a most satisfactory testimonial from the Duke of Marlborough in her favour (though, note, the narrative was not then gone to Blenheim) ; and begging the gentlewoman's husband would transcribe it and send it to her, as she wished to send a copy to a friend in the country. The husband had done so, but had had the precaution to write at top Copy; and before the signature had written, signed, M, — both which words Miss had erased, and then de livered the gentleman's identic transcript to the groom, to be brought back as from Blenheim : which the steady groom, on being exarained anew, confessed; and that, being bribed, he had gone but one post and invented the rest. You will now pity the poor General, who has been a dupe from the beginning, and sheds fioods of tears; nay, has actually turned his daughter out of doors, as she is banished from Argyll-house too : and "Lady Charlotte,* to her honour, speaks of her with the utmost indignation. In fact, there never was a more extraordinary tissue of effrontery, folly, and imposture. It is a strange but not a miraculous part of this strange story, that Gunnilda is actually harboured by, and lodges with, the old Duchess '^ in Pall-Mall, the grandmother of whora she has miscarried, and who was the first that was big with her. * Lady Charlotte CampbeU. See p. 389. — E. ^ Gertrude, eldest daughter of John Earl Gower, widow of John fourth Duke of Bedford.— E. 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 397 You may depend on the authenticity of this narrative, and may guess frora whom I received all the circumstances, day by day ; but pray, do not quote rae for that reason, nor let it out of your hands, nor transcribe any part of it. The town knows the story confusedly, and a raillion of false readings there will be ; but, though you know it exactly, do not send it back hither. You will, perhaps, be diverted by the various ways in which it will be related. Yours, &c. Eginhart, secretary to Charlemagne and the Princess Gunnilda, his daughter. P. S. Bowen is the name of the gentleraan who gave infor mation of the letter sent to him to be copied, on hearing of the suspected forgeries. The whole Minifry are involved in the suspicions, as they defend the damsel, who still confesses nothing; and it is her mother, not she, who is supposed to have tampered with the groom ; and is discarded, too, by her husband. TO THE EARL OF CHARLEMONT.* Berkeley Square, Feb. 17, 1791. It is diflBcuh, my lord, with comraon language that has been so prostituted in compliments, to express the real sense of gratitude, which I do feel at ray heart for the obligation I have to your lordship for an act of friendship as unexpected as it was unsolicited ; which last circurastance doubles the fa vour, as it evinces your lordship's generosity and nobleness of temper, without surprising me. How can I thank your lordship, as I ought, for interesting yourself, and of yourself, to save me a little mortification, which I deserve, and should deserve more, had I the vanity to imagine that my printing a few copies of my disgusting tragedy would occasion dif ferent and surreptitious editions of it ? ' Now first collected. This letter was written in consequence of one Walpole had received, informing him that a Dublin bookseller was about to print his tragedy of The Mysterious Mother. At this time, and indeed until the Union took place, there was no act of parUament which regu lated literary property in Ireland. — E. 398 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. Mr. Walker has acquainted me, my lord, that your lord ship has most kindly interposed to prevent a bookseller of Dublin from printing an edition of "The Mysterious Mother" without my consent; and, with the conscious dignity of a great mind, your lordship has not even hinted to me the graciousness of that favour. How have I merited such con descending goodness, my lord ? Had I a prospect of longer hfe, I never could pay the debt of gratitude ; the weightier, as your lordship did not intend I should know that I owe it. My gratitude can never be effaced ; and I am charmed that it is due, and due with so much honour to me, that nothing could bribe me to have less obhgation to your lordship, of which I am so proud. But as to the play itself, I doubt it must take its fate. Mr. Walker tells me the booksellers have desired him to remonstrate to me, urging that they have already expended fifty pounds; and Mr. Walker adds, as no doubt would be the case, that should this edition be stifled, when now expected, some other printer would publish it I certainly might indemnify the present operator, but I know too much of the craft, not to be sure, that I should be per secuted by similar exactions ; and, alas ! I have exposed my self but too much to the tyranny of the press, not to know that it taxes delinquents as well as multiplies their faults. In truth, my lord, it is too late now to hinder copies of my play from being spread. It has appeared here, both whole and in fragments; and, to prevent a spurious one, I was forced to have some printed myself: therefore, if I con sent to an Irish edition, it is from no vain desire of diffusing the performance. Indeed, my good lord, I have lived too long, not to have divested myself both of vanity and affected modesty. I have not existed to past seventy-three without having discovered the futility and triflingness of my own ta lents : and, at the same time, it would be impertinent to pre tend to think that there is no merit in the execution of a tragedy, on which I have been so much flattered ; though I am sincere in condemning the egregious absurdity of selecting a subject so improper for the stage, and even offensive to private readers. 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 399 But I have said too much on a personal theme; and there fore, after repeating a million of thanks to your lordship for the honour of your interposition, I will beg your lordship, if you please, to signify to the bookseller that you withdraw your prohibition : but I shall not answer Mr. Walker's letter till I have your lordship's approbation, for you are both my lord chamberlain and hcenser ; and though I have a tolerably independent spirit, I may safely trust myself under the ab solute power of one, who has voluntarily protected me against the licentiousness of those who have invaded my property, and who distinguishes so accurately and justly between li cence and liberty. TO MISS AGNES BERRY. Berkeley Square, Feb. 18, 1791. Here is a shocking, not a fatal, codicil to GunnUda's story. But first I should tell you, that two days after the explosion, the Signora Madre took a postchaise and four, and drove to Blenheim ; but, not finding the Duke and Duchess there, she inquired where the Marquis was, and pursued him to Sir Henry Dashwood's : finding him there, she began about her poor daughter; but he interrupted her, said there was an end put to all that, and desired to lead her to her chaise, which he insisted on doing, and did. I think this another symptom of the Minifry being accomplices to the . daughter's enterprises. Well ! after the groom's confession, and after Mr. Bowen had been confronted with her, and produced to her face her note to his wife, which she resolutely disowned, she desired the Duke of Argyll to let her take an oath on the Bible of her perfect innocence of every circumstance of the whole transaction ; which you may be sure he did not permit N'importe : the next day, taking two of the Duchess of Bed ford's servants for witnesses, she went before a justice of peace, swore to her innocence and ignorance throughout, even of the note to Mrs. Bowen ; and then said to the magistrate, " Sir, from my youth you may imagine I do not know the 400 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. solemnity of an oath ; but to convince you I do, I know my salvation depends on what I have now sworn." Solve all this, if you can ! Is it madness? Does even romance extend its inventions so far ? or its dispensations ? It is but a burlesque part of this wonderful tale, that old crazy Bedford exhibitb Miss every morning on the causeway in Hyde Park ; and de clares her protegee some time ago refused the hand of your acquaintance, Mr. Trevelyan.* Except of the contending Opera-houses, one can hear of nothing but Miss Gunning; but it is now grown so disgusting a story, that I shall be glad to hear and repeat to you no more about it. The Pantheon has opened, and is small, they say, but pretty and simple; all the rest ill-conducted, and from the singers to the scene-shifters imperfect; the dances long and bad, and the whole performance so dilatory and tedious, that it lasted from eight to half an hour past twelve. The rival theatre is said to be magnificent and lofty, but it is doubtful whether it will be suffered to come to hght : in short the con test will grow pohtics; Dieu et Mon Droit supporting the Pantheon, and Icli Dien countenancing the Haymarket It is unlucky that the amplest receptacle is to hold the minority ! 20th. O'Hara^ is corae to town. You will love him better than ever. He persuaded the captain of the ship, whom you will love for being persuaded, to stop at Lisbon, that he might see Mrs. Damer. O'Hara has been shockingly treated ! The House of Richmond is on the point of receiving a very great blow. Colonel Lenox, who had been dangerously ill but was better, has relapsed, with all the worst symptoms ; ' and is too weak to be sent to the south, as the physicians re- > Mr. Trevelyan married, in the foUowing August, Maria, daughter of Sir Thomas Spencer WUson, Bart. On the death of his father, in 1828, he succeeded to the title, as fifth baronet. — E. ° Afterwards lieutenant-governor of Gibraltar. He died in 1802. ' Colonel Lenox recovered from his iUness, and, in 1806, succeeded his uncle as fourth Duke of Richmond. His grace was governor of Canada at the period of his decease, at Montreal, in 1819 ; and was suc ceeded by the son here anticipated ; who was born on the 3rd of August 1791.— E. " 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 401 commended. Lady Charlotte is breeding, but that is very precarious ; and should it even be a son, how many years ere that can be a comfortable resource ! Is not it strange that London, in February and Parhament sitting, should furnish no more paragraphs ? Yet confined at home and in everybody's way, and consequently my room being a coffee-house from two to four, I probably hear all events worth relating as soon as they are born, and send you thera before they are a week old. Indeed, I think the Gun- ninghiana may last you a month at Pisa, where, I suppose, the grass grows in the streets as fast as news. When I go out again, I am likely to know less : I go but to few, and those the privatest places I can find, which are not the common growth of London ; nor, but to amuse you, should I inquire after news. What is a juvenile world to me ; or its pleasures, interests, or squabbles ? I scarce know the performers by sight 21st. It is very hard ! The Gunnings will not let me or the town have done with them. La Madre has advertised a Letter to the Duke of Argyll : so he is forced to collect counter afiidavits. The groom has deposed that she pro mised him twenty pounds a year for his hfe, and he has given up a letter that she wrote to him. The raother, when she went after the Marquis, would have persuaded him to get into her chaise ; but he would not venture being carried tp Gretna-green, and married by force. She then wanted hira to sign a paper, that all was over between him and her daughter. He said, " Madam, nothing was ever begun ;" and refused. I told you wrong : mother and daughter were not actually in the Duchess of Bedford's house, but in Lord John Russel's, which she lent to them ; nor were her servants witnesses to the oath before Justice Hide, but Dr. Halifax and the apo thecary. The Signora and her Infanta now, for privacy, are retired into St James's-street next door to Brooks's; whence it is supposed Miss wiU angle for unmarried Mar quises — perhaps for Lord Titchfield.* It is lost time for ' In 1795, the Marquis of Titchfield married Miss Scott, eldest VOL. VI. 2 D 402 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. people to write novels, who can corapose such a romance as these good folks have invented. Adieu ! TO THE MISS BERRYS. Berkeley Square, Feb. 26, 1791. I HAVE no letter from you to answer, nor anything new that is the least interesting to teU you. The Duke of Argyll has sent a gentleman with a cart-load of aflSdavits, which the latter read to mother and daughter, in order to prevent the pubhcation of their hbel ; but it only enraged the former, who vows she will print all she knows, that is, anything she has heard by their entire intimacy in the family, or, no doubt, what she can invent or misrepresent What a Medusa ! There has been a fragment of a rehearsal in the Hay market but still the Pantheon remains master of the field of battle : the vanquished are preparing manifestos, but they seldora recover the day. Madame du Barry* is come over to recover her jewels, of which she has been robbed — not by the National Assemhly, but by four Jews who have been seized here and comraitted to Newgate. Though the late Lord Barrymore acknowledged her husband to be of his noble blood, will she own the pre sent Earl for a relation, when she finds him turned strolling player ! - If she regains her diamonds, perhaps Mrs. Hastings raay carry her to court.^ If you want bigger events, you may send to the Russian army, who will cut you fifteen thousand throats in a para graph ; or, en attendant, you may piddle with the havoc made at Chantilly, which has been half demohshed by the rights of raen, as the poor old Mesdames have been stopped by the daughter and heir of General John Scott, of Balcomie, in the county of Fife, and in 1809, succeeded his father as fourth Duke of Portland. — E. ' The last mistress of Louis the Fifteenth. The Count du Barry, who had disgraced his name by marrying her, claimed to be of the same famUy with the Earls of Barrymore in Ireland. See vol. v. p. 256. — E. ' See ante, p. 365. ^ Mrs. Hastings was supposed, by the party violence of the day, to have received immense bribes in diamonds. 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 403 rights of the poissardes ; for, as it is true that extremes meet the moment despotism was hurled from the throne, it de volved to the mob, whose majesties, not being able to write their names, do not issue lettres de cachet, but execute their wills with their own hands; for hanging, which degrades an executioner, ne deroge pas in sovereigns — witness the Czar Peter the Great, Muley Ishraael, and raany rehgious and gracious African raonarchs. After eleven weeks of close confinement, I went out yes terday to take the air ; but was soon driven back by rain and sleet which soon ripened to a tempest of wind and snow, and continued all night: it does not freeze, but blows so hard, that I shall sally out no more till the weather has recovered its temper — I do not mean that I expect Pisan skies. 28th. It was on Saturday that I began this ; it is now Monday, and I have no letter from you, though we have had dozens of east winds. I am sorry to find that it costs above six weeks to say a word at Pisa and have an answer in London. This makes correspondence very uncomfortable ; you will be talking to me of Miss Gunning, when, perhaps, she may be sent to Botany Bay, and be as much forgotten here as tlie Monster.'- Still she has been a great resource this winter ; for, though London is apt to produce Wilkeses, and George Gordons, and Mrs. Rudds, and Home Tookes, and other phenomena, wet and dry, the present season has been very unprolific ; and we are forced to iraport French news, as we used to do fashions and Operas comiques. The Mesdames are actually set out : I shall be glad to hear they are safe at Turin, for are there no poissardes but at Paris ?* Natio pois- sarda est ' A vagabond so called, from his going about attempting to stab at wo men with a knife. His first aim had probably been at their pockets, which having in several instances missed and wounded his intended victims, fear and a love of the marvellous dubbed him with the name of the Mon ster. The wretch, whose name was Renwick Williams, was tried for the offence at the Old BaUey, in July 1790, and found guUty of a mis demeanour. — E. ^ After numerous interruptions, the King's aunts were permitted by the National Assembly to proceed to Italy. — E. 2d 2 404 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. Mr. Gibbon writes that he has seen Necker, and found him StiU devoured by ambition,* and I should think by morti fication at the foolish figure he has made. Gibbon admires Burke to the skies, and even the rehgious parts, he says.^ Monday evening. The east winds are making me amends ; one of them has brought me twins. I am sorry to find that even Pisa's sky is not quite sovereign, but that you have both been out of order, though, thank God ! quite recovered both. If a Flo rentine March is at all like an English one, I hope you wiU not remove thither tUl AprU. Some of its months, I am sure, were sharper than those of our common wear are. Pray be quite easy about me : I am entirely recovered, though, if change were bad, we have scarce had one day without every variety of bad weather, with a momentary leaf-gold of sun. I have been out three times, and to-day have made five- and-twenty visits, and was let in at six ; and, though a httle fatigued, am still able, you see, to finish my letter. You seera to think I palhated my illness : I certainly did not tell you that I thought it doubtful how it would end ; yet I told you all the circumstances, and surely did not speak sanguinely. I wish, in No. 20, you had not again named October or November. I have quite given up those raonths, and am ' " I have passed," says Gibbon, in a letter to Lord Sheffield, " four days at the castle of Copet with Necker ; and could have wished to have shown him as a warning to any aspiring youth possessed with the demon of ambition. With aU the means of private happiness in his power, he is the most miserable of human beings : the past, the present, and the future, are equally odious to him. When I suggested some domestic amusement of books, building, &c. he answered, with a deep tone of despair, ' Dans I'^tat oil je suis, je ne puis sentir que le coup de vent qui m'a abbatu.' How different from the conscious cheerfulness with which our friend Lord North supported his fall ! Madame Necker maintains more external composure, mais le diable n'y perd rien. It is true that Necker wished to be carried into the closet, like old Pitt, on the shoulders of the people, and that he has been ruined by the demo cracy which he had raised. I believe him to be an able financier, and know him to be an honest man." — E. ' The foUowing are Gibbon's expressions : — " Burke's book is a most admirable medicine against the French disease ; which has made too much progress even in this happy country. I admire his eloquence, I approve his politics, I adore his chivalry, and I can forgive even his superstition." — E. 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 405 vexed I ever pressed for them, as they would break into your reasonable plans, for which I abandon any foolish ones of my own. But I am a poor philosopher, or rather am like all philosophers, have no presence of mind, and must study my part before I can act it. I have now settled myself not to expect you this year — do not unsettle me : I dread a dis appointment, as I do a relapse of the gout; and therefore cut this article short that I may not indulge vain hopes. My affection for you both is unalterable : can I give so strong a proof as by supplicating you, as I do earnestly, to act as is most prudent for your healths and interest? A long journey in November would be the worst part you could take, and I beseech you not to think of it: for rae, you see I take a great deal of killing, nor is it so easy to die as is iraagined. Thank you, my dearest Miss Agnes, for your postscript I love to see your hand-writing ; and yet do not press for it as you are shy : though I address myself equally to both, and consult the healths of both in what I have recommended above. Here is a postscript for yours : Madame du Barry was to go and swear to her jewels before the Lord Mayor. Boydell, who is a little better bred than Monsieur BaiUy,* made ex cuses for being obhged to administer the oath chez lui, but ' M. Bailly, the learned astronomer. He was president of the first National Assembly, and in July 1789 appointed mayor of Paris; in which situation he gave great offence to the people, in July 1791, by ordering martial law to be proclaimed against a mob which had assem bled in the Champ de Mars to frame an addi-ess, recommending the de position of Louis. For this step, which was approved of by the Assembly, he was arrested, tried, condemned, and put to death on the 1 1th of No vember 1793. The details of this event are horrible. " The weather," says M. Thiers, " was cold and rainy. Conducted on foot, he manUested the utmost composure amidst the insults of a barbarous populace, whom he had fed while he was mayor. On reaching the foot of the scaffold, one of the wretches cried out, that the field of the federation ought not to be poUuted by his blood. The people instantly rushed upon the guU- lotine, bore it off, and erected it again upon a dung-hUl on the bank of the Seine, and opposite to the spot where Bailly had passed his life and composed his invaluable works. This operation lasted some hours : mean while, he was compelled to walk several times round the Champ de Mars, bareheaded, and with his hands pinioned behind him. Some pelted him with mud, others kicked and struck him with sticks. He feU exhausted. They lifted him up again. ' Thou tremblest !' said a soldier to him. ' My friend,' replied the old man, ' it is cold.' At length he was deU vered over to the executioner ; and another iUustrious scholar, and one of tbe most virtuous of men, was then taken from it." Vol. iU. p. 207. — E. 406 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. begged she would name her hour; and, when she did, he fetched her himself in the state-coach, and had a mayor-royal banquet ready for her.* She has got most of her jewels again. I want the King to send her four Jews to the National As sembly, and tell them it is the change or la monnoie of Lord George Gordon, the Israelite. Colonel Lenox is much better: the Duchess of Leinster had a letter from Goodwood to-day which says he rides out. I am glad you do. I said nothing on " the Charming-man's" poem. I fear I said too much to him myself. He said, others liked it; and showed me a note from Mr. Burke, that was hyperbole itself. I wish him so well, that I am sorry he should be so flattered, when, in truth, he has no genius.'^ There is no novelty, no plan, and no suite in his poetry; though many of the lines are pretty. Dr. Darwin alone can exceed his predecessors. Let me repeat to both, that distance of place and time can make no alteration in my friendship. It grew from esteem for your characters, and understandings, and tempers; and be came affection from your good-natured attentions to me, where there is so vast a disproportion in our ages. Indeed, that complaisance spoiled rae; but I have weaned myself of my own self-love, and you shall hear no more of its dictates. ' See post, p. 408. — E. ' Mr. Gifford was of Walpole's opinion, and has, in consequence, ac corded to " The Charming-man " a prominent situation in the Baviad — " See sniv'ling Jerningham at fifty weep O'er love-lorn oxen and deserted sheep." To the poem here alluded to, and which was entitled " Peace, Ignominy, and Destruction," the satirist thus alludes : — " I thought I understood something of faces ; but I must read my Lavater over again I find. That a gentleman, with the ' physionomie d'un mouton qui reve,' should sud denly start up a new Tyrtaeus, and pour a dreadful note through a cracked war-trump, amazes me : well, fronti nulla fides shall henceforth be my motto." In a note to the Pursuits of Literature, Mr. Mathias directs the attention of Mr. Jerningham to the following beautiful lines in Dryden's Epistle to Mr. Julien, Secretary of the Muses : — " AU his care Is to be thought a Poet fine and fair ; Small beer and gruel are his meat and drink. The diet he prescribes himself to think ; Rhyme next his heart he takes at morning peep. Some love-epistles at the hour of sleep ; And when his passion has been bubbling long. The scum at last boils up into a song." — E. 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 407 TO THE MISS BERRYS. Berkeley Square, March 5, 1791. One may live in a vast capital, and know no more of three parts of it than of Carthage. When I was at Florence, I have surprised some Florentines by telling thera, that Lon don was built, like their city, (where you often cross the bridges several times in a day,) on each side of the river; and yet that I had never been but on one side; for then I had never been in Southwark. When I was very young, and in the height of the opposition to ray father, ray mother wanted a large parcel of bugles ; for what use I forget As they were then out of fashion, she could get none. At last she was told of a quantity in a little shop in an obscure alley in the City. We drove thither ; found a great stock ; she bought it, and bade the proprietor send it horae. He said, " Whither?" " To Sir Robert Walpole's." He asked coolly, « Who is Sir Robert Walpole?" This is very hke Carabridge, who tells you three stories to make you understand a fourth. In short, t'other raorning a gentleman made me a visit and asked if I had heard of the great misfortune that had happened? The Albion Mills are burnt down. I asked where they were ; supposing they were powder-mUls in the country, that had blown up. I had literally never seen or heard of the spacious lofty building at the end of Blackfriars Bridge. At first it was supposed maliciously burnt, and it is certain the mob stood and en joyed the conflagration, as of a monopoly ; but it had been on fire, and it was thought extinguished. The building had cost a hundred thousand pounds; and the loss in corn and flour is calculated at a hundred and forty thousand. I do not answer for the truth of the sums ; but it is certain that the Palace-yard and part of St James's Park were covered with half-burnt grain.* ' The fire took place on the morning of the 2nd of March. There was no reason for any particular suspicion, except the general dislike in the lower classes of the people, arising from a notion, that the undertaking enhanced the price of corn and decreased the value of labour. — E. 408 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. This accident and my introduction, have helped me to a good part of my letter; for you must have observed, that even in this overgrown town the winter has not been productive of events. Good night ! I have two days to wait for a letter that I may answer. Stay ; I should tell you, that I have been at Sir Joseph Banks's hterary saturnalia,* where was a Parisian watch-maker, who produced the smallest automaton that I suppose was ever created. It was a rich snuff-box, not too large for a woman. On opening the lid, an enamelled bird started up, sat on the rim, turned round, fluttered its wings, and piped in a delightful tone the notes of different birds; particularly the jug-jug of the nightingale. It is the prettiest plaything you ever saw; the price tempting — only five hun dred pounds. That economist the Prince of Wales, could not resist it, and has bought one of those dickybirds. If the maker finds such customers, he will not end like one of his profession here, who made the serpent in Orpheus and Eu rydice ; ^ and who fell so deeply in love with his own works, that he did nothing afterwards but make serpents, of all sorts and sizes, till he was ruined and broke. I have not a tittle to add — but that the Lord Mayor did not fetch Madame du Barry in the City-royal coach ; but kept her to dinner. She is gone ; but returns in April, TO MISS BERRY. Strawberry HiU, Saturday, March 19, 1791. I DID not begin my letter on customary Friday, because I had nothing new to teU or to say. The town hes faUow— not an incident worth repeating as far as I know. Parhament manufactures only bills, not politics. I never understood any thing useful; and, now that ray tirae and connections are shrunk to so narrow a compass, what business have I with business ? As 1 have mended considerably for the last four ' Sir Joseph Banks, while president of the Royal Society, had a weekly evening reception of all persons distinguished in science or the arts. ' A celebrated opera. 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 409 days, and as we have had a fortnight of soft warm weather, and a south-west wind to-day, I have ventured hither for change of air, and to give orders about some repairs at Clive den ; which, by the way, Mr. Henry Bunbury, two days ago, proposed to take off my hands for his life. I really do not think I accepted his offer. I shall return to town on Monday, and hope to find a letter to answer — or what will this do? Berkeley Square, Monday evening. I ara returned, and find the only letter I dreaded, and the only one, I trust, that I shall ever not be irapatient to receive froiii you. Though ten thousand times kinder than I deserve, it wounds my heart; as 1 find 1 have hurt two of the persons I love the best upon earth, and whom I am most constantly studying to please and serve. That I soon repented of my murraurs, you have seen by ray subsequent letters. The truth, as you may have perceived, though no excuse, was, that I had thought myself dying, and should never see you more ; that I was extremely weak and low when Mrs. Damer's letter arrived, and mentioned her supposing I should not see you till spring twelvemonth. That terrible sentence recalled Mr. Batt's being the first to assure me of your going abroad, when I had concluded you had laid aside the design. I did sin cerely allow that in both instances you had acted from ten derness in concealing your intentions ; but, as I knew I could better bear the information from yourselves than from others, I thought it unfriendly to let me learn from others what in terested me so deeply : yet I do not in the least excuse my conduct; no, I conderan it in every light, and shall never for give rayself if you do not promise rae to be guided entirely by your own convenience and inclinations about your return. I am perfectly weU again, and just as hkely to hve one year as half an one. Indulge your pleasure in being abroad whUe you are there. I ara now reasonable enough to enjoy your happiness as my own ; and, since you are most kind when I least desei-ve it, how can I express ray gratitude for giving up the scruple that was so distressing to rae ! Convince rae you are in earnest by giving me notice that you will write to 410 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. Charing-cross while the Neapolitans are at Florence.* I will look on that as a clearer proof of your forgiving my criminal letter, than your return before you like it. It is most sure that nothing is raore solid or less personal than my friendship for you two ; and even my complaining letter, though unjust and unreasonable, proved that the nearer I thought myself to quitting the world, the more my heart was set on my two friends ; nay, they had occupied the busiest moments of my Ulness as well as the most fretful ones. Forgive then, my dearest friends, what could proceed from nothing but too ira patient affection. You say most truly you did not deserve my complaints : your patience and temper under them make me but the raore in the wrong ; and to have hurt you, who have known but too rauch grief, is such a contradiction to the whole turn of ray mind ever since I knew you, that I believe ray weakness from illness was beyond even what I suspected. It is sure that when I am in my perfect senses, the whole bent of my thoughts is to proraote your and your sister's felicity ; and you know nothing can give me satisfaction like your allowing me to be of use to you. I speak honestly, not withstanding my unjust letter; I had rather serve you than see you. Here let rae finish this subject : I do not think I shall be faulty to you again. The Mother Gunning has published her letter to the Duke of Argyll, and it disappoints everybody. It is neither roraan- tic, nor entertaining, nor abusive, but on the General and Mr. and Mrs. Bowen, and the General's groom. On the Bowens it is so imraeasurably scurrilous, that I think they raust prose cute her. She accuses them and her husband of a conspiracy to betray and ruin his own daughter, without even attempting to assign a motive to them. Of the House of Argyll she says not a word. In short, it is a most dull incoherent rhapsody, that gives no account at all of the story that gave origin to her ' His correspondents, to settle his mind as to the certainty of their return at the time they had promised, had assured him, that no financial difficulties should stand in the way ; which is what he means by sending to Charing-cross (to Drummond his banker). No such difficulties oc curred. The correspondence, therefore, with Charing-cross never took place.— M. B. 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 411 book, and at which no mortal could guess from it; and the 246 pages contain nothing but invectives on her four supposed enemies, and endless tiresome encomiums on the virtues of her glorious darling, and the unspottable innocence of that harm less lambkin. I would not even send it to you if I had an opportunity — you would not have patience to go through it ; and there, I suppose, the absurd legend will end. I am heartily tired of it. Adieu ! P. S. That ever / should give you two an uneasy moment ! Oh ! forgive rae : yet I do not deserve pardon in my own eyes ; and less in my own heart. TO THE MISS BERRYS. Berkeley Square, Sunday, March 27, 1791. Though I begin my despatch to-day, I think I shall change my post-days, as I hinted, from Tuesdays to Fridays ; not only as more commodious for learning news for you, but as I do not receive your letters generally but on Mondays, I have less time to answer. I have an additional reason for delay this week. Mr. Pitt has notified that he is to de liver a message from the King to-morrow, to the House of Commons on the situation of Europe; and should there be a long debate, I may not gather the particulars tiU Tuesday morning, and if my levee lasts late, shall not have time to write to you. Oh ! now are you all impatience to hear that message ; I am sorry to say that I fear it is to be a warlike one. The Autocratrix swears, d — n her eyes ! she will hack her way to Constantinople through the blood of one hundred thousand more Turks, and that we are very impertinent for sending her a card with a sprig of olive. On the other hand, Prussia bounces and huffs and claims our promise of help ing him to make peace by helping him to make war ; and so, in the most charitable and pacific way in the world, we are, they say, to send twenty ships to the Baltic, and half as many to the Black Sea, — this little Britain, commonly called Great 412 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. Britain, is to dictate to Petersburg and Bengal, and cover Constantinople under those wings that reach from the North Pole to the farthest East ! I am mighty sorry for it, and hope we shall not prove a jackdaw that pretends to dress itself in the plumes of imperial eagles ! If we bounce abroad, we are more forgiving at home : a gentleman who hves at the east end of St James's Park has been sent for by a lady who has a large house at the west end,* and they have kissed and are friends ; which he notified by toasting her health in a bumper at a club the other day. I know no circumstances, but am glad of it; I love peace, public or private : not so the chieftains of the contending theatres of harmony. Taylor, in wondrous re spectful terms and full of aflliction, has printed in the newspapers an advertisement, declaring that the Marquis's honour the Lord Chamberlain ^ did in one season, and that an unprofitable one, send orders (you know, that is tickets of admission without paying) into the Opera-house, to the loss of the raanagers of four hundred pounds — ser vants, it is supposed, and Hertfordshire voters eke: and moreover, that it has been sworn in Chancery that his lord ship, not as lord charaberlain, has stipulated with Gallini and O'Reilly that he, his heirs and assigns, should preserve the power of giving those detrimental orders in perpetuity. The iraraunity is a little new : forraer chamberlains, it seems, even durante officio, have not exercised the privilege — if they had it One word more of the Gunnings. Captain Bowen in formed the authoress, by the channel of the papers, that he shaU prosecute her for the libel. She answered, by the same conveyance, that she is extremely glad of it. But there is a diSiculty — unless the prosecution is criminal, it is thought that Madam being femme couverte, the charge must be made against her husband ; and, to be sure, it would be droll that the General should be attacked for not hindering his wife from writing a libel, that is more virulent against him himself ' The Queen and the Prince of Wales. '^ The Marquis of Salisbury. 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 413 than anybody ! Another little circumstance has come out : till the other day he did not know that he had claimed de scent from Charlemagne in the newspapers ; which, there fore, is referred to the sarae manufacture as the other forgeries. The General said, " It is true, I am well born ; but I know no such famUy in Ireland as the Charlemagnes." Lord Ossory has just been here, and told me that Gun nilda has written to Lord Blandford, in her own narae and hand, begging his pardon (for proraising herself marriage in his name), but imputing the first thought to his grandmother, whom she probably inspired to think of it This letter the Duchess of Marlborough carried to the Duchess of Bedford, to open her eyes on her protegee, but with not much success ; for what signify eyes, when the rest of the head is gone ? She only said, " You may be easy, for both mother and daughter, are gone to France " — no doubt, on finding her grace's raoney not so forthcoraing as her countenance, and terrified by Cap tain Bowen's prosecution — and there, I hope, will terminate that strange story; for in France there is not a marquis left to marry her. One has heard of nothing else for these seven months ; and it requires some ingenuity to keep up the at tention of such a capital as London for above half a year together. I supped on Thursday at Mrs. BuUer's with the Conways and Mount-Edgcumbes ; and the next night at Lady Ailes bury's with the same company, and Lady Augusta Clavering.* You know, on the famous night at your house when Gunnilda pretended that ber father had received Lord Blandford's appointment of the wedding-day, we suspected, when they were gone, that we had seen doubts in Lady Augusta's face, and I desired her uncle. Lord Frederick, to ask her if we had guessed right ; but she protests she had then no suspicion. I have determined to send this away on Tuesday, whether I know the details of the temple of Janus to-morrow in tirae or not, that you may give yourselves airs of importance, if the Turin ministers pretend to tell you news of your own country * Eldest daughter pf John Duke of Argyle. 414 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. that you do not know. You may say, your charg6 des affaires sent you word of the King's raessage; and you may be myste rious about the rest ; for mystery in the diplomatic dictionary is construed knowledge, though, hke a Hebrew word, it means the reverse too. Sunday night. I have been at White Pussy's* this evening. She asked much after you's. I did not think her lord looked as if he would drive Prince Potemkin out of Bulgaria ; but we trust that a new Frederick of Prussia and a new William Pitt wiU. Could they lay Catherine in the Black Sea, as ghosts used to be laid in the Red, the world would be obhged to them. TO MISS BERRY. Strawberry HiU, Sunday night, AprU 3, 1791. Oh ! what a shocking accident ! Oh ! how I detest your going abroad more than I have done yet in iqy crossest mood ! You escaped the storra on the 10th of October, that gave me such an alarra ; you passed unhurt through the cannibals of France and their republic of larrons and poissardes, who terri fied rae sufficiently; but I never expected that you would dash yourself to pieces at Pisa ! ^ You say I love truth, and that you have told me the exact truth ; but how can fear be lieve ? How I hate a party of pleasure ! It never turns out well ; fools fall out and sensible people fall down ! Still I thank you a mUhon of times for writing yourself If Miss Agnes had written for you, I confess I should have been ten times more alarmed than I am ; and yet I am alarmed enough. Not to torment you more with my fears, when I hope you are almost recovered, I will answer the rest of your letter. * Elizabeth Cary, wife of Lord Amherst, at this time commander-in- chief. ^ Miss Berry had fallen down a bank in the neighbourhood of Pisa, and received a severe cut on the nose. 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 415 General O'Hara I have unluckily not met yet He is so dis persed, and I am so confined in my resorts and so seldom dine from home, that I have not seen him, even at General Conway's. When I do, can you imagine that we shall not talk of you two — yes ; and your accident, I am sure, will be the chief topic. "As our fleets are to dethrone Catherine Petruchiar, O'Hara will probably not be sent to Siberia. Apropos to Catherine and Petruchio. I supped with their representatives, Kemble and Mrs. Siddons, t'other night at Miss Farren's : the Hothams * were there too, and Mrs. An derson, '^ who treated the players with acting as many charac ters as ever they did, particularly Gunnilda and Lady Clack- mannan.3 Mrs. Siddons is leaner, but looks well : she has played Jane Shore and Desdemona, and is to play in the Gamester ; all the parts she will act this year. Kemble, they say, shone in Othello, Mrs. Damer has been received at Elvas with all military honours, and a banquet, by order of Mello, forraerly ambas sador here. It was handsome in him, but must have dis tressed her, who is so void of ostentation and love of show. Miss Boyle,* who no more than Miss Pulteney,^ has let herself be snapped up by lovers of her fortune, is going to Italy for a year with Lord and Lady Maiden.^ Berkeley Square, Monday after dinner. Mirabeau is dead;'' ay, miraculously; for it was of a pu- * Sir Charles Hotham Thompson, married to Lady Dorothy Hobart, sister of John second Earl of Buckinghamshire. ' A daughter of Lady Cecilia Johnstone's, married to a brother of Charles Anderson Pelham, Lord Garborough. ' A nickname, which had been given by the writer to a lady of the society. * Afterwards married to Lord Henry Fitzgerald. " Afterwards married to Sir James Murray. ^ Lord Maiden, afterwards Earl of Essex, was a first cousin of Miss Boyle's. This journey did not take place. ' Mirabeau died on the 2nd of April, at the age of forty-two, a victim to his own debaucheries. His friend, M. Dupont, says of him, that " trusting to the strength of his constitution, he gave himself up, with out restraint, to every Kind of pleasure." Madame de Stael states, that he suffered crueUy in the last days of his life, and when no longer able to speak, wrote to his physician for a dose of opium, in the words of 416 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. trid fever (that began in his heart). Dr. Price is dying also.* That Mr. Berry, with so much good nature and good sense should be staggered, I do not wonder. Nobody is more de voted to hberty than I am. It is therefore that I abhor the National Assembly, whose outrageous violence has given, I fear, a lasting wound to the cause; for anarchy is despotism in the hands of thousands. A hon attacks but when hungry or provoked ; but who can live in a desert full of hyajnas ? — nobody but Mr. Bruce; and we have only his word for it Here is started up another corsair ; one Paine, from America, who has published an answer to Mr. Burke.^ His doctrines go to the extremity of levelling ; and his style is so coarse, that you would think he meant to degrade the language as much as the government : here is one of his delicate para graphs : — " We do not want a king, or lords of the bedcham ber, or lords of the kitchen," &c. This rhetoric, I suppose, was calculated for our poissardes. TO MISS BERRY. Berkeley Square, Friday night AprU 15, 1791. My preface wiU be short; for I have nothing to tell, and a great deal that I am waiting most impatiently to hear ; all which, however, maybe couched in these two phrases, — "I ara quite recovered of my fall, and my nose will not be the worse for it" — for with all my pretences, I cannot help hav ing that nose a little upon my spirits ; though if it were flat I should love it as much as ever, for the sake of the head and heart that belong to it. I have seen O'Hara, with his face as Hamlet, " to die — to sleep !" His obsequies were celebrated with great pomp, and his body placed in the Pantheon, by the side of that of Des cartes. In two short years, his ashes were removed, by order of the Con vention, and scattered abroad by the populace ; who, at the same time, burned his bust in the Place de Greve. — E. ' Dr. Price died on the 19th of AprU. — E. ' This was the first part of the " Rights of Man," in answer to the celebrated " Reflections." At the commencement of the year, Paine had pubUshed at Paris, under the borrowed name of Achille Duchatellet, a tract recommending the abolition of royalty. — E. 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 417 ruddy and black, and his teeth as white as ever ; and as fond of you two, and as grieved for your fall, as anybody — but I. He has got a better regiment Strawberry HiU, Sunday night, past eleven. You chose your time ill for going abroad this year: England never saw such a spring since it was fifteen years old. The warmth, blossoms, and verdure are unparalleled. I am just come from Richmond, having first called on Lady Di. who is designing and painting pictures for prints to Dryden's Fables.* Oh ! she has done two most beautiful; one of Emily walking in the garden, and Palamon seeing her from the tower: the other, a noble, free composition of Theseus parting the rivals, when fighting in the wood. They are not as you will imagine, at all like the pictures in the Shakspeare GaUery : no ; they are worthy of Dryden. I can tell you nothing at all certain of our war with Russia. If one believes the weather-glass of the stocks, it will be peace: they had fallen to 71, and are risen again, and soberly, to 79. Fawkener, clerk of the council, sets out to-day or to morrow for Berlin ; probably, I hope, with an excuse. In the present case, I had much rather our ministers were bullies than heroes: no mortal likes the war. The court-majority lost thirteen of its former number at the beginning of the week, which put the Opposition into spirits; but, pursuing their motions on Friday, twelve of the thirteen were re- covered.2 Lord Onslow told me just now, at Madame de BouflSers's, that Lady Salisbury was brought to bed of a son and heir 3 last night, two hours after she came from the Opera ; and that Madame du Barry dined yesterday with the ' A splendid edition of the Fables of Dryden, ornamented with en gravings, from the elegant and fascinating pencil of Lady Diana Beau clerc, was published in folio, in 1797. — B. " On the 12th of April, a series of resolutions, moved by Mr. Grey, the object of which was to pronounce the armament against Russia inex pedient and unnecessary, were, after a warm debate, negatived by 252 against 172. A similar motion, made on the 15th, by Mr. Baker, was rejected by a majority of 254 to 162. — E. " James-Brownlow- WiUiam Gascoyne CecU. In 1823, he succeeded his father as second Marquis of SaUsbury. — E. VOL. VI. 2 E 418 CORRESPONDENCE OF 1791. Prince of Wales, at the Duke of Queensberry's, at Richmond. Thus you have all my news, such as it is ; and I flatter my self no English at Pisa or Florence can boast of better in telhgence than you — but for you, should I care about Madame du Barry or my Lady Salisbury, or which of them hes in or hes out ? Berkeley Square, Monday, AprU 18. Oh ! what a dear letter have I found, and from both at once ; and with such a delightful bulletin ! I should not be pleased with the idleness of the pencil, were it not owing to the chapter of health, which I prefer to everything. You order me to be particular about my own health: I have nothing to say about it but that it is as good as before my last fit. Can I expect or desire more at my age ? My am bition is to pass a summer, with you two established at Clive den. I shall not reject more if they come ; but one must not be presumptuous at seventy-three ; and though my eyes, ears, teeth, motion, have still lasted to make life comfortable, I do not know that I should be enchanted if surviving any of thera ; and, having no desire to becorae a phUosopher, I had rather be naturally cheerful than affectedly so : for patience I take to be only a resolution of holding one's tongue, and not coraplaining of what one feels — for does one feel or think the less for not owning it ? Though London increases every day, and Mr. Herschell has just discovered a new square or circus somewhere by the New Road in the Via Lactea, where the cows used to be fed, I be lieve you will think the town cannot hold all its inhabitants ; so prodigiously the population is augmented. I have twice been going to stop my coach in Piccadilly, (and the same has happened to Lady Ailesbury,) thinking there was a mob; and it was only nyraphs and swains sauntering or trudging. T'other morning, i. e. at two o'clock, I went to see Mrs. Garrick and Miss Hannah More at the Adelphi, and was stopped five times before I reached Northumberland-house; for the tides of coaches, chariots, curricles, phaetons, &c. are endless. Indeed, the town is so extended, that the breed of chairs is almost lost ; for Hercules and Atlas could not carry 1791. THE HON. HORACE WALPOLE. 419 anybody from one end of this enormous capital to the other. How magnified would be the error of the young woman at St Helena, who, some years ago, said to a captain of an In- diaraan, "I suppose London is very empty, when the India ships come out" Don't make me excuses, then, for short let ters ; nor trouble yourself a moment to lengthen them. You compare little towns to quiet times, which do not feed history; and most justly. If the vagaries of London can be comprised once a week in three or four pages of small quarto paper, and not always that, how should httle Pisa furnish an equal ex port? When Pisa was at war with the rival republic of Milan, Machiavel was put to it to describe a battle, the slaughter in which araounted to one man slain ; and he was trampled to death, by being thrown down and battered in his husk of complete armour; as I remeraber reading above fifty years ago at Florence. Eleven at night. Oh ! mercy ! I am just corae from Mrs. BuUer's, baring left a very pleasant set at Lady Herries'* — and for such a col lection ! Eight or ten women and girls, not one of whom I knew by sight ; a German Count as stiff and upright as the inflexible Dowager of Beaufort ; a fat Dean and his wife, he speaking Cornish, and of baring dined to-day at Lambeth; four young oflScers, friends of the boy Buller,'^ who played with one of them at tric-trac, while the others made with the Misses a stUl raore noisy comraerce ; and not a creature but Mrs. Cholmondely, who went away immediately, and her son, who was speechless with the head-ache, that I was the least acquainted with: and, to add to my sufferings, the Count would talk to me of les beaux arts, of which he knows no more than an oyster. At last carae in Mrs. Blair, whom I know as little; but she asked so kindly after you two, and was so anxious about your fall and your return, that I grew quite fond of her, and beg you would love her for my sake, as I do for yours. Good night ! I have this moment received a card frora the Duchess-dow- ' The wife of the banker in St. James's-street. ' Mrs. BuUer's only child. 2 E 2 420 CORRESPONDENfCE OF 1791. ager of Ancaster, to summon me for to-morrow at three o'clock — I suppose to sign Lord Cholmondeley's marriage- articles with her daughter.* The wedding is to be this day sevennight Save me, my old stars, from wedding-dinners ! But I trust they are not of this age. I should sooner expect Hymen to jump out of a curricle, and walk into the Duchess's dressing-room in boots and a dirty shirt TO MISS BERRY. Strawberry HiU, AprU 23, 1791. To-day, when the town is staring at the sudden resigna tion of the Duke of Leeds,^ asking the reason, and gaping to know who will succeed him, I am come hither with an in difference that might pass for phUosophy ; as the true cause is not known, which it seldom is. Don't tell Europe; but I really am come to look at the repairs of Cliveden, and how they go on ; not without an eye to the hlacs and the apple- blossoms : for even self can find a corner to wriggle into, though friendship may fit out the vessel. Mr. Berry raay, perhaps, wish I had more pohtical curiosity ; but as I must return to town on Monday for Lord Cholmondeley's wedding, I may hear before the departure of the post if the seals are given : for the Duke's reasons, should they be assigned, shall one be certain? His intention was not even whispered till Wednesday evening. The news frora India, so long ex pected, are not couleur de rose, but de sang : a detachraent has been defeated by Tippoo Saib, and Lord Cornwallis is gone to take the command of the army himself. Will the East be more propitious