YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY TWELVE LECTURES NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN, RISE AND PROGRESS OF PHILOSOPHY. ALEXANDER KINMONT, A. M. WITH A BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF THE AUTHOR. Philosophic autem objeclum triplex, Deus, natura, homo. — Bacon. Homo eeset, per quern Deus transeat in naturam, seu per quern natura possit ascendere ad Deum. Perfectio naturae dependet a perfectione hominis; Deus enim naturae stator non aliter mundum disponit, quam quale est medium seu homo, per quern cum mundo communicat. — Swedenborg. CINCINNATI: PUBLISHED BY U. P. JAMES, 26 PEARL STREET. 1839. Entered according to act of Congress, in the year 1839, BY W. HOOPER, In the Clerk's Office for the District Court of Ohio. R. P. BROOKS, PRINTER, No. 1 Baker-street. ADVERTISEMENT. The late Mr. Kinmont, during the winter of 1837-8, delivered, in public, the lectures which comprise this volume. At the close ofthe course, his audience, desirous that the result of so much labor, experience, and patient research, should not perish with its utterance, or be limited to the impressions upon a few minds, presented, with their acknowledgments of high gratification, a request that he would favor them with a copy for publication. To this he reluctantly yielded, and applied the leisure which his daily avocations permitted to transcribing them ; a task which he had scarcely completed, when he was summoned, we doubt not, to higher and more exalted appointments. Under these circumstances, it may be doubted whether they would have been given to the world, had not the public, or at least that portion of them who best knew his worth, appreciated his talents, and most acutely felt his loss, demanded some mirror of his mind, some transcript of his natural graces and attainments. To them, then, the work is dedicated, and appears under their auspices; but not without a deep sense, on the part of those to whom was committed its supervision through the press, that IV ADVERTISEMENT. there are many imperfections which would not have exist ed, had it received the last touch and finish of the artist. The lectures, in their present form, are little more than outlines of the subjects discussed on the occasion of their delivery — each having been introduced by an extempo raneous exordium of fervid and impassioned eloquence, which few who heard will ever cease to remember. It is known to have been the author's intention, had he lived, to have appended copious notes, a deficiency which it is now impossible to supply. The style is natural to Mr. Kinmont, the peculiar dress of his mind, and may not be in correspondence with the fashion which prevails ; with this it has not been deemed prudent in any manner to interfere, the desire being to present a just copy of the original. His mind, from his intimate acquaintance with, and passionate fondness for, the writings of antiquity, became moulded and fashioned by them ; and the same reasons which led him to those fountains (natural ones at least) of thought and feeling, for ideas and sentiments which you seek almost in vain in the extended commentaries of the day, inclined him to disregard and dislike the affectation and formality of modern compositions. If the reader should not discover, on the perusal of these lectures, any truth or fact with which he was not before acquainted, it is believed he will meet many in a new guise, exhibited under different phases and aspects he will find original views of truth, which are in fact new truths, in the same sense as every plant that is produced, or child that is born, is a new idea — a fresh expression of the wisdom and goodness of the Creator. The captious ADVERTISEMENT. V critic may perhaps find much to condemn, a wide occa sion for the display of his book-learning, vanity, and opinionative conceit ; yet it is hoped the sincere searcher after truth will not " be sent empty away." But as it is not our purpose to present a review, or anticipate the judgment of others by expressing our own of the merits of the work, we close by the adoption in all sincerity of the maxim of the author — the same which influenced his higher pursuits and encouraged his hum bler duties: — Sit glorias Dei, et utilitati hominum. CONTENTS. Biographical Sketch of the Author, 1 LECTURE I. On Max considered as a Unit 17 LECTURE II. On the Limits and Orders of Nature, 29 LECTURE III. On Language — Its Origin and Use, 65 LECTURE IV. St. Augustine and Baron Cuvier, or the meeting of the Fifth and Nineteenth Centuries, 91 LECTURE V. On the predominant; of the Religious Sentiment in the Early Ages .... 117 LECTURE VI. On Ancient Religion and Modern Science, . . ... I II LEf II RE VII. On the Origin and Perpetuation of .Natural Races m Mankind, 167 V1H CONTENTS. LECTURE VIII. On the Unity in Variety of the Human Race, 201 LECTURE IX. On the Character of the Ancient Germans, 235 LECTURE X. On the Man of America — Spanish and English, 265 LECTURE XI. On the Arts and Commerce of the Phoenicians, 293 LECTURE XII. On the Elements of American Civilization, 323 SKETCH OF THE AUTHOR'S LIFE. Alexander Kinmont was born January 5th, 1799, in the parish of Marytown, three miles west from Montrose, in Angusshire, Scot land. His parents were members of the Presbyterian church; — placed in very humble circumstances, they were extremely frugal and industrious, and remarkable for their exemplary piety and inde pendence of character. His father, who is represented as having been of a kind and gentle disposition, and a truly devout man, early impressed upon his son the same reverence for the Sacred Scriptures which he himself felt and acknowledged. He inculcated especially upon him, at a very tender age, implicit obedience to the Ten Com mandments, urging it by the consideration, that they had been writ ten by the finger of God himself. The impression thus stamped upon the forming mind of his child, was never forgotten or effaced. Inheriting from his parents the most inflexible honesty and indepen dence of spirit, he was remarkable in infancy, for his courage, — ex hibiting no signs of fear, in common with other children. Nor was he less marked for his quick observation, ready memory, and faculty of imitation. When about four years of age, he visited the parish school with his brother, and on his return in the evening, surprised the whole family, by repeating, word for word, the long prayer of the Domine, with exact imitation of look and gesture. He learned to read with the greatest facility; but soon falling into idle habits at school, received from the master very severe chastisements, which, on no occasion, however, drew from him a single tear or complaint. At this time, the reduced circumstances of his parents obliged them to hire him out to a neighboring farmer, by whom he was em ployed to guard his cattle and horses from trespassing upon the adjoining crops, — the fields there being all unenclosed. This em ployment, though somewhat uncongenial with his active and thought ful disposition, nevertheless brought him into circumstances, which were calculated to foster and develope an ardent love of nature, and a devoted attachment to rural life, which never forsook him in after years. He was thus occupied until about eight years of age, when his father died of a brain fever, during the paroxysms of which, he alone succeeded in soothing the violence of the sufferer, when even the stoutest men fled in terror. 2 , BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH He was thus early left to the control and guidance of his mother, an excellent woman, of fine sensibilities, and a most affectionate heart. Never after the decease of her husband, was the poignancy of the loss absent from her mind. She became in consequence ex tremely pensive, and her whole character was tinged with melan choly, the influence of which was not entirely lost upon her son, although naturally of a most buoyant, spirited, and cheerful disposi tion. He was now sent to the parish school, where he soon became quite as remarkable for his ingenuous disposition and reckless and independent character, as for his scholastic proficiency. Shortly after this period, an event took place which changed the entire current of his life, and placed him in the way of developing those varied and useful talents, for which he has since been distin guished. While assisting at a threshing-mill in the neighborhood of Montrose, one of the wheels caught the tattered sleeve of his coat, and drew in the right arm, mangling it in the most shocking manner, until, with great presence of mind, he braced himself firmly, while it was torn from his body near the shoulder. To his brother, who came to him shortly after the accident, he said, with the most perfect composure: — " Never mind, Willie, you see I can do very well with one arm. The men all ran away and left me standing; but I grasped the stump to keep in my blood, and called for help." He was taken to the Infirmary, and bore the necessary amputation without utter ing the least complaint. Under the kind and careful treatment of the Surgeon and Intendant, he speedily recovered, and was urgently advised by them to devote himself to literary pursuits, as affording the most eligible field for the developement and proper exercise of his talents. He returned to the parish school; but soon mastered the learning of his teacher. On one occasion, meeting with a difficulty in arithmetic, which he could not solve, he applied for assistance to the Domine, who, being unable to give it, put him off with some ex cuse until the next day. During the evening, with his characteristic reliance upon himself in every emergency, he succeeded, after re peated trials, in the solution of the question; but having reason to doubt the skill of the master, renewed his claim for an explanation on the morrow. The Domine, fairly puzzled, was forced to acknow ledge his ignorance, when Kinmont, turning round the back of his slate, and showing him the solution of the difficulty, dryly said, ^'Here, sir, it is." The reward for this triumph over his master's ignorance was a blow, which nearly levelled him to the ground. He was now about twelve years of age, when he left the parish school, and returned to his mother's cottage. He did not however abandon his studies, but walked daily five miles to attend 'the school of a Mr. Huddleston, a teacher of very respectable acquirements, and author of a History of the Celts. Here he made considerable proficiency in the Latin language, and also in navigation, surveying, and the common branches of an English education. The opinions expressed of him, at this time, by his instructor, excited the interest OF THE AUTHOR. 3 of the parish ministers in his behalf, who frequently invited him to their houses/ and advised him in his course of study, and in the choice of books. These gentlemen, who were possessed of superior talents and fine religious sentiments, exercised a very beneficial influ ence over him, and he always spoke of them in terms of high respect and gratitude. At thirteen years of age, he attended the Grammar School of Montrose, under the superintendence of Mr. Calvert, an English man, and an excellent classical scholar. With him he studied the Latin, Greek, and French languages, and Mathematics. His appli cation was incessant — his studying-hours being regularly prolonged till near midnight, while he allowed himself no farther recreation than a walk of an hour in the evening. During this period he made rapid advances in Latin, in which he was greatly assisted by con stant exercises in composition in that language. He remained here two years, at tlie charge of his mother; but brought up in frugality, his wants were easily supplied, and books and tuition-bills were the heaviest items of expense. He was now, however, enabled to sup port himself by compensations for assisting the Principal of the Academy, and for instruction in private families, in which employ ments he continued until he had attained his nineteenth year, when he resolved to enter the University of Aberdeen. In most of the Universities and Seminaries of learning in Scot land, there are funds appropriated for the encouragement and support of scholars of acknowledged merit. Kinmont, accordingly, with a view of presenting himself as a candidate for admission at Aberdeen, prepared a Latin poem, and a treatise on the particle re, which, he doubted not, would secure him the object of his wishes. On his ar rival at the University, with his friend, Mr. Huddleston, he pre sented his theme to the Master of the High School, one of the Judges of such productions. The conversation was conducted in Latin, and the Master, delighted with his new acquaintance, unhesi tatingly assured him that it was quite certain that he would take the prize over all his competitors. The result, however, proved differ ent, in despite of the remonstrances of the Master. His theme was highly praised by the Professors for its purity of style, but rejected on account of two grammatical errors. He received it back from them, and replied to their delicate praises by an open expression of his sense of the injustice with which he had been treated. The mail-stage was about starting for the south; he instantly mounted on top, and travelling all night, arrived early in the morning, at St. An drews, and entered the Hall of the University in time to hear the subjects of the themes proposed to the candidates for admission. Making his selection from among them, he completed the task before he slept, and had the satisfaction of carrying off' the first prizes in Latin, Greek, and Geometry, over about thirty competitors. These secured to him board and lodging in the University for four years from the fall of 1817. He did not, however, avail himself of the 4 biographical sketch privilege for more than three years, during which time he supplied his other wants by private teaching. In this interval he ranked the first in ever}' class he entered. Bearing into his college life the most ardent attachment for rural scenes, and all the varied aspects of the picturesque and romantic, which Nature presents in those north ern climes, he was extremely fond of roaming amid the stern and wild scenery of his native land; often, too, in company with a friend, he would waste whole nights in rambles by moon-light over the Scottish hills. Thus was his imagination and heart alike enlivened and invigorated. Borne onward upon a full tide of enthusiastic feelings, all his movements, both mental and physical, were marked by rapidity, energy, and decision. On whatever study he under took, he brought the entire powers of his mind to bear with an un wavering singleness of purpose, and hence he never failed of success. In debate, he is said to have carried every thing before him by the impetuous and resistless torrent of his eloquence. Always cheerful, devoted to his studies, and ardent in the pursuit of knowledge, he early secured the friendship and esteem of his Instructors; but no present advantages he enjoyed could bind him longer to St. An drews, so soon as he had caught a glimpse of a more extended pros pect of improvement and success in another quarter. Fired by the fame of Edinburgh and her celebrated University, he hastened to that Metropolis, where he taught in some of the first families of the place, and attended the various classes in the Univer sity. While here, he wrote a Latin poem, which was considered as possessing considerable merit, and also a Tragedy, part of which was sent to Mr. Elliston, then Manager of Covent Garden Theatre, who expressed himself in the highest terms of commendation of its me rit, and sought especially, an acquaintance with its author. Elliston dying very shortly after, this effort of the Tragic Muse was "con signed to the tomb of the Capulets." At this time our Author attended the Philosophical and Theologi cal classes of the University, but he soon became disgusted with the irrational, as well as unscriptural systems of Theology inculcated in the latter. The atheistical soi-disant Philosophy of Revolution ary France was at this period in full vogue over the greater part of Europe, nor did the Scottish University escape the blighting influ ence of this demon of scepticism. Though not perhaps avowedly yet at least practically, the precepts of Christianity were generally denied. It was impossible for Kinmont to avoid beino- affected by the moral miasmata of the times, and an incident which occurred in his presence tended in no slight degree to confirm his increasing doubts as to the truths of revelation. One of the preceptors on a certain occasion, in praying had assumed a very irreverent nosture and with his eyes half open, in a careless tone, vvas going over a mum mery of devotion. At this instant, one of the dignitaries of the College happening to enter, the preceptor instantly raised his hands to heaven, and changing entirely his position and tone of voice per OF THE AUTHOR. formed the remainder of the service with the solemnity of a saint. Kinmont was so disgusted by this conduct, that he was led to think Religion a mockery, and its professors cither hypocrites or fools. Nor was this opinion weakened, but rather confirmed, by his observation of the licentious conduct of most of the candidates for holy orders. He therefore soon abandoned his theological studies, and devoted himself with redoubled zeal to the Greek and Latin classics, of which he had ever been a most enthusiastic admirer. An ardent friend of free institutions, and a decided enemy of aris tocracy and of all privileged orders, he had ever felt the deepest attachment for the Lnited States of America, and eagerly desired to satisfy himself, by personal observation, as to the true extent of free dom and independence enjoyed under its government. Dreading above all things the servility usually' demanded by the patronizing spirit of the great and wealthy, although his services at this time were much desired by several distinguished individuals in London, (to whom he was known through some pamphlets he had published, and from his private letters,) he was unwilling to owe his advance ment to aught save his own unassisted exertions. With these feel ings, meeting one day a friend in all the hurry of preparation for a journey, he enquired his destination. "America," replied he, urging him, at the same time, by various arguments, to accompany him. " Give me half an hour to reflect upon it," said Kinmont, "and I will tell you my decision." By the expiration of that time, he de clared his determination to accompany him, and made immediate pre paration for his departure. One of the most powerful motives which urged him to leave Scotland, was, as he afterwards asserted, to secure for his mother and sister, a more comfortable home in the new land of his adoption. For his mother he always entertained a most affec tionate regard and filial reverence; and previous to his leaving Scot land, gave directions that what property he had collected, should be sold, and the proceeds remitted to her, together with a small amount. of money he had invested in the funds; reserving for himself a sum only sufficient to defray his expenses to America. His wish was complied with, but too late for her to be sensible of this proof of his affection ; a delirium seized her on the perusal of his last letter, com municating his determination to visit America, which soon termina ted her mortal existence. He set sail immediately, and arrived in New York about the end of May, 1823. Finding himself without money, but at the same time free from all fear of want, and full of his native independence, he sold his watch, and sought forthwith an opportunity of rendering himself useful as a classical teacher. With his characteristic readi ness, and restless anxiety to be at work, he accordingly employed the very next day after his arrival, in assisting at an examination of the school of Nelson, the celebrated blind teacher. Finding, how ever, that his services were not required in New York, he remained there but a few days, and started on foot for Baltimore. On approach- 6 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ing within sight of the Monumental City, he had but a single dollar remaining, and his compassion was so moved by the distress of a traveller whom he chanced to meet, that he gave him even the half of that. Thus, destitute, alone, and unfriended, did he enter Balti more, but his energy and sterling abilities soon procured him employ ment ; and he remained in this city until he had obtained means suf ficient to bear him still further into the interior of the country. Learning that a classical teacher was wanted at Bedford, Pa., he de termined to visit that place, and apply for the situation. He went there on foot, choosing this mode of travelling, not only from habit, but as being most economical, and especially as affording him the best opportunities of studying the character, and learning the condition of the people, among whom he was seeking a home. In this manner he rendered his journey both delightful and instructive. Carrying with him a copy of one of the Greek tragic poets, he would often stop in some sequestered spot, and amuse himself by reciting aloud passages from a favorite play, fancying he could breathe in more freely, as it were, the warm inspiration of the Grecian Muse, from the very air of this western world, where the ancient spirit of republican freedom was again revived. On one of these occasions, while reading aloud with all the unrestrained enthusiasm of his nature under the excitement of the poetry and the story, the clergyman of a neighboring village chanced to pass by on his way to church ; being a good classical scholar, he listened to the sounds with amazement, and watching un- perceived, Kinmont's gesticulations, for some time, took such a par tiality to the man, that he accosted him with a polite request to ac company him to the church, which was readily complied with. At the conclusion of the service, the parson followed up his first invita tion by conducting his new acquaintance to his house, and entertain ing him for several days, before he would suffer him to proceed on his journey. Arriving at Bedford, he was immediately appointed Principal of the Classical Academy in that village, and by his unremitted applica tion to the discharge of his duties, andithe rapid progress of his pupils, soon convinced the citizens that in him they had secured an instruc tor of superior abilities, and one highly qualified to succeed in the education of youth. His character, at this period, though marked by simplicity, candor, and extreme rapidity of thought and execution was deeply tinged with melancholy, verging often even on misan thropy. His social intercourse was confined to a few select friends and he was observed to be particularly fond of solitary walks, and appa rently always absorbed in meditation. He seemed to have no fixed and definite end in view; and harassed by the most gloomy doubts on the subject of religion, he was at last reduced to such a state of despair as to avow that he could see no farther use of life. A friend, with whom he was residing, perceiving the sceptical tendencies of his mind and the despondency under which he was suffering, suggested to him the propriety of examining the doctrines of the New Jerusalem Church OF THE AUTHOR. 7 as most likely to solve all his difficulties, by imparting to him a rational and philosophical view of the nature of Divine Revelation, and leading him at once to the vital truths of Christianity. It was not, however, until after repeated recommendations, that he finally commenced reading the Arcana Cgjlestia. As he progressed with the first volume, his interest in it gradually increased, and from regard ing it at first as a most extraordinary production, before he had fin ished that volume, he acknowledged his entire conviction of the Divine Inspiration of the Sacred Scriptures, and soon became a wil ling and zealous receiver of the doctrines of the New Church — ever after declaring this removal of his former scepticism, the most important and happiest event of his life. His character seemed now to undergo a complete change. The grim and dismal forms of infidelity instantly disappeared, and a new and clear light from the Sacred Word beamed upon his mind, and illumined his whole pathway through life. He was no longer without an end to live for, but devoted himself with fresh alacrity to the performance of all his duties. Desirous of removing every memento of his former self, he burnt up at this period, all his previous writings, and determined to start afresh, as it were, on a new career of existence. His walks were no longer solitary, but enlivened by the presence of some friend; and Nature, instead of offering gratifications merely to his senses or imagination, was teem ing with fresh beauties never perceived before, and calling into just exercise the awakened powers of his new rational being. His leisure hours were occasionally employed in the composition of ballads and little poems, for his own gratification and the amusement of his friends. On several occasions, he prepared dramatic pieces as exer cises for his scholars; but he was never a very zealous aspirant for poetical honors. The following extract from a Drama ofthe "Silver Age," written by him, and performed by his pupils, at one of their regular examina tions, may serve to exhibit his style in this species of composi tion, as well as the peculiar bent of his mind, and the principles of action he henceforth adopted through life. The dramatis personal are two brothers: 1st Bro. — Seek only good. ' 2d B. — And where shall good be found 1 1st B. — There, only there, Where those that ask can never fail to find. 2d B. — All good descends from Heaven : 1st B. — Thou say'st most true : Seek onxt good, thus pleasure comes uhbooght. 2d B. — Is pleasure then in good 1 1st B. — There, surely found, And only there, pure and endurable. 2d B. — I do believe 'tis so, yet wonder still That happiness should come of toil ; For what but toil can gain that eminence Where fairest Wisdom, as thou say'st, resides; — BIOGRAPHICAL sketch Canst thou explain me this 1 1st B. — Perhaps I may, If thou attend. 2d B. I will with patient ear. 1st B.— There is Oxr. only God, the Lord Supeeme, by whom All things subsist; Eternal, Infinite; And Wise as Infinite, and Good as Wise : Goodness and Wisdom dwell alone in him ; Nor uncommunicated dwell, but are That living fountain, whence the Wise and Good, So named of men, derive intelligence, — Intelligence which ever flows from Heaven. But those alone are good, alone are wise, Who act with cheerfulness the part assign'd Their duty here ; which part who shuns to act, Or acts with backward or unwilling mind, Is neither wise nor good, nor can be such: — For not to act — mark this — is to refuse The gift of Heaven, that ll'isdom which thou seek'st. This wisdom, he who acts, and humbly still, Shall constantly receive, and shall be bless'd, Triumphant o'er the toils of mortal life, And fed with good from Hraven ; — and such alone, My Brother, count thou happy. 2d B. — 0 heavenly words Though rudely spun, flow more divinely sweet Than songs of softest music on the ear, And raise far nobler thoughts : Wherefore, my brother, I thank thee much thy words of sound instruction : And now I learn from thee true Wisdom's road — That road I will ascend, however steep. 1st B. — Bless'd be thy choice : one moment intermit not, For in that moment thou may'st be undone. But listen farther, I had more to tell. 2d B. — I listen eagerly. 1st B. — To cheer thy toil, And aid thy footsteps to ascend the hill, Some handmaids Heaven will send thee, if thou ask. 2d B. — iSay what their names, that I may ask aright. 1st B. — Some I shall tell, the rest thou soon wilt learn. The first is Charity, a heaven-born maid, Whose eye so beameth with another's good, And mildness such a sweet'ning influence sheds, That though Jbou thought'st it hard at first to toil All for thyself alone, — taught by her voice Thou now wilt gladly do for her dear sake, And for the general good, what seem'd before The hardest, heaviest task. Next will appear, If thou wilt ask of Heaven, fair Temperance, Healthful of hue and aspect, up by dawn, And always pleased the most with simplest things: None better skilled than she to brave the steeps, And clear the ascent of Virtue's rugged way. Or would'st thou see Contentment, sweetest nymph, And Resignation, with her eye in Heaven : Or Cheerfulness and Labor, hand in hand, March on before thee, — undivided twain ? 0 may these heavenly guides attend thee, Brother, And all the virtues, smiling in their train, Which ask thou still of Heaven, and they will come, OP THE AUTHOR. 9 Will trooping como, and lead thco by the hand Up Wisdom's eminence, where thou at last Shalt safe arrive, and dwell in peace scenic. 2d B. — Thanks to thee, Brother : no longer steep shall seem To mo sweet Virtue's path ; — most gladly I Will tread that path — that path which winds on high. But see, the sun now pours his rays From yonder Eastern hill ; The woods seem kindled in his blaze, Wide glances vale and rill ; The lambkins all now skip and play Beneath his lively beam ; 1st B. — Hail, glorious Monarch of tho Day ! Hail, thou all-cheering gleam ! 2d B. — So Wisdom fair, with cheerful light, Breaks on the clouded mind, Fast fly the shadows of the night, And leave all bright behind : 1st B. — Hail, image fair of Truth Divine ! 'Tis Truth itself that bids thee shine. Etc. Henceforward, he devoted all the energies and resources of his mind to science, literature, and the education of youth; for he felt that there especially lay the field of his duties. During one of the vacations of his Academy, he visited Cincinnati, travelling, as was his custom, the greater part ofthe way, if not the entire distance, on foot. He remained in this place but a short time, however, and re turned to Bedford, taking his course, as a pedestrian, through the interior of Ohio. After remaining at Bedford about three years, with a view to ex tend his usefulness, he removed, during the summer of 1827, to Cin cinnati, where he immediately obtained the full number of scholars he felt himself competent to instruct in the various branches of a Clas sical, Mathematical, and English education. What were the main springs and ends of his exertions, may be readily inferred from the motto, which he inscribed at this time upon the first page of his ac count-book: — Sit glorias Dei, et utilituti hominum. With such pure and philanthropic motives of action, and possessed of no ordi nary share of intellectual vigor and manly independence of charac ter, he could not but succeed in every thing that he undertook. Having at length, therefore, firmly established his merit as a success ful Teacher, and perfectly secure from all anxiety of a pecuniary nature, he was married, January 15th, 1829. His usefulness was not, however, confined exclusively to his school, even anterior to this time. From the fall of 1828, he cheer fully officiated as a teacher of the doctrines of the New Church, as often as his services were required by the Society to which he was attached. In the summer following, being appointed a licentiate of the church, at the request of the same Society, he continued at inter vals in the performance ofthe duties appertaining to that office until the spring of 1833, when he was invited to take charge of the First New Jerusalem Society, as its regular minister, and that he might JO BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH devote himself exclusively to the various duties of that functio^o abandon his school. In his reply declining this offer, he »y8' , have never felt it a burthensome, but, on the contrary, a delighttal duty, to explain to my brethren, as myself one of the ™?Z<-™?™: trines of the New Church. While, therefore, a regularly-orda.ned minister would be able to attend to the ordinances of the church , 1 also am willing to explain the doctrines as a teacher, ^fj™™ reward, as I consider myself called upon to do, since the Lord gra ciously enables me to supply my temporal wants by temporal labors during the six days of the week." Convinced that there was a more extenfive field of usefulness presented before him in the imparting of scientific instruction to youth, and in aiding to call forth those faculties, which would enable them in after life, rationally to per ceive the truths of Christianity, and to confirm and illustrate them by the facts and deductions of science, he could not brook the idea of surrendering his school, and hence he boldly replied to the remon strances of his friends on the subject: " Gentlemen, the New Church with me, is in my school in the first instance, in preachings in the second. " His mode of teaching was not modelled after any particular or uniform system, but adapted, as far as possible, to the individual wants and capacities of his pupils, for he early perceived that there were constitutional differences of mind, and that each member of a society or of the community at large, was best qualified for the performance of a specific duty. Hence, he often complained bitterly of the extrava gant notions of many parents in endeavoring to make scholars and great men of their children, when they were qualified by nature to become altogether more useful and happy in the workshop, or the field. "Each of those lads," said he, sweeping his hand over his school, " if he be not of solid mahogany, must needs be, at least, veneered." Possessing the nicest discrimination in the various shades of character presented to his view, he readily classified all his pupils under the several natural genera of minds, which he had observed to maintain from the earliest ages down to the present times ; and he endeavored, accordingly, to bring out, to the best of his ability, the striking qualities of each. In other words, he intended by his course of instruction, that each one should be actually educated — should display all the various useful tendencies and resources that lay hid within him. Whenever he received a new pupil, if he were unable at once to assign him his proper place, or wished to ascertain the extent of his acquirements, he would engage his attention, and addressing him on some subject connected with history or natural science, would say to him, in conclusion, " Now, sir, write down all you remember of what I have been telling you. " And upon the scholar's complying, he would invariably be able to decide accurately upon his character, and the studies most appropriate for him to pur sue. The great aim of his instructions, both as a Teacher of Science and Theology, seems to have been, not merely to impart the know- OF THE AUTHOR. 1 \ ledge of truth, but to urge, by every possible motive, the doing of it. This practical tendency of his mind was not only stamped upon his philosophy, but present and perceptible in every thing he said ; so that it has been observed of him, and by men, too, disagreeing with him ia many of his opinions, that even his ordinary conversations were worthy of being made public. His integrity and purity of heart, and the vital importance he attached to the moral education of the youth entrusted to his charge, may be judged of by tlie motto which he affixed over the door of his school-house : — " Nil dictu feodum visuque haec limina tangat, Intra quas puer est." — " Procul, O ! procul este profani : ' '• Maxima debetur puero reverentia. " Always ready and instant in the performance of duties himself, he endeavored to impress a like character upon his pupils. A young man having called upon him on a Friday, and expressed a wish to enter his school on the coming Monday, Kinmont instantly replied, "By no means, sir; commence this very afternoon ; get yourself used to the tools you are to work with now, that you may begin the coming week with good omens, and a well-grounded hope of suc cess." His rule of action was to perform faithfully, and without solicitude, the duty of the present hour, and to let the future take care of itself. So implicit was his trust that Divine Providence would dispose all things for the best, when man had done the part as signed to him, that his only care was how he himself might perform the greatest amount of good of which his being was capable. To a friend, conversing with him on this subject, who jocosely asked, " Will you not lay by a penny for a rainy day? " he answered, with a smile, " When I am in want of a dollar, I will draw upon Heaven." It is not to be inferred from this, that he was at all improvident, for such was never the case; but he considered a reliance upon worldly prudence, without a confidence and hope of a far higher order, as mere " vanity and vexation of spirit. " He was a devoted and incessant student throughout the whole of his life, and never suffered his mind to be crushed or subdued by any subject of his study. If the information he acquired, therefore, served to increase the mental resources of his genius, it was no less useful in calling forth new and original views, by exciting the activity of his own independent thoughts. His favorite authors were Plato, Homer, and the Greek Tragedians, Tacitus, Cicero, Bacon, St. Augustine, Swedenborg, and Milton. The "Paradise Lost," (apart from its theological dogmas,) he esteemed as the greatest effort of human genius, in any age either ancient or modern. On first reading it, when a youth, he could not sit still, but would start up in the highest excitement, and pace the room for some time before he could regain complete possession of himself. In after life, it was often the pocket companion of his rural walks. His reading was not, however, confined to the writers just 12 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH enumerated ; but he constantly endeavored, by taking in the widest possible range of authors of all ages, to create within himseit a sym pathy for the whole wide brotherhood of Man, both past and present —to approximate continually to a view and appreciation ot irulft Universal. He was consequently a strenuous advocate of lrequent exercises in translation from the classic writers of antiquity ;_ urging these, as among the most efficient means of humanizing ihe individ ual who would undertake them. But his views on this subject, embrace so much of the character of the man, that they cannot be better pre sented than in his own language ; they are herewith subjoined :— _ « There prevails an opinion, that our times are remarkably origi nal ; and to this I ascribe, in a great measure, that disesteem in which classical literature, whether Greek, Latin or English, is at present held. To write and speak like no other person, seems now to be considered a merit. It were wrong to discourage an implicit and unreserved confidence in Truth and Nature ; but that profusion of language and poverty of thought, which is now called being sponta neous and original, is any thing rather than a proof of simplicity of heart or freedom of understanding. In such careless toealth, there is generally more of adulterate than sterling coin — more paper than GOLD. " This mania of originality is especially inimical to the labors of the schoolmaster. You can hardly now persuade a youth to take the necessary pains to elaborate a just and expressive translation of an elegant passage of a classical author: — he is afraid that he may lose that free and unembarrassed air of originality which nature herself so lavishly bestows, but this imitation might impede or destroy. "And yet there are few exercises more beneficial, regarded as a part of mental discipline, than Translation. A man might pursue such exercises with benefit to his own mind through his whole course of life ; it is the most profitable way of keeping company with minds of a lofty stamp. It is then you come into the closest intimacy with genius and taste, and feel the entire divinity of their manner. It serves to correct that vicious idiosyncracy which belongs more or less to all who write or speak much, and which is sometimes not disa greeable from calling up associations of noble thoughts, with which it is wont sometimes to be associated ; but notwithstanding this acci dental advantage, it is nevertheless a positive defect; and of all kinds of imitation, that unconscious following of one's self is the most unfortunate. Translation, by compelling the mind to run in an unfa miliar channel, is the best corrective of this, and may be safely applied at any period of life : so far from deadening the powers of original thinking, it will quicken them, by bringing foreio-n and unusual trains of thought before the mind. If a man has really the latent sources of new and original ideas within him, nothing can repress them. Could the mind of Shakspeare have been buried beneath the rubbish of Greece or Rome,— such their learning has been deemed of late— and be it such,— he would have risen tri- OF THE AUTHOR. 13 umphant and adorned with their spoils, and not one of all his natu ral glories tarnished. By imitation and translation, one will always gain something, and can lose nothing, unless a vicious mannerism, which the sooner he loses the better. It is a characteristic of all good writers that they are addicted to imitation, for no one can write well (I speak not of words and periods) who has not a strong sym pathy for and admiration of all that is beautiful ; and the more imi tative he is in this sense, the more original and pleasing will he be ; for he will not be the segment of a man, but the whole. It is a greater exploit to imitate successfully, than to be original, and lo invent. Bulwer is a mere original, and hence an inferior genius, harsh and unnatural, (any man could write as well as he does, who had impudence enough,) but Walter Scott was an imitator, and hence the charm and naturalness of his works. We recognise in him a family likeness with the whole writing race. Demosthenes copied Thucydides, — a devoted copier, but remarkably successful, although he wanted range, from not having copied more extensively. Cicero copied and imitated every body, — the very mocking-bird of elo quence ; but that is not his disparagement, but his greatest distinction and glory : who so various as Cicero, who so sweet, so powerful, so simply eloquent, or again so magnificently flowing, and each and all in turns ? The man's mind was a perfect panharmonicon ; it was because he despised this paltry modern affectation of originality, and reverenced the gods and loved his fellow-creatures, and therefore his mind was open to all kinds of good influences, and received the natu ral impression of every grand and lovely object. Your original cha racter, your original writer, has no sympathies ; he is heart-bound, brain-bound, and lip-bound; he is truly an oddity; he is like nobody, and nobody like him ; he feeds on self-adoration, or the adulation of fools, who mistake the oracles of pride and vanity for the inspirations of Heaven. The most perfect imitator that ever wrote, perhaps, was Burns, the Poet of Scotland, — 'Scotia Rediviva would be the right motto of his works. The resurrection-bodies ofthe just Will not be more their own identical bodies (for this I believe, maugre the author of " Natural Enthusiasm,") than were the songs and glorious inspired strains of Burns, the bodies of the old Prophets, the Vates Caledoniae, risen again. And what nonsense they talk of Homer, as if he, forsooth, were original, and the father of all those epithets and metaphors ! No, the greatest imitator, I make no doubt, that ever lived ; he could not have sung so rapturously otherwise, and of all the elder bards too. He must have been a greater imitator than Vir gil, for Virgil is an inferior poet. What poet was ever so original as the author of the Columbiad? — Fuit. Wordsworth, I understand, is a very original poet; — Does any body read Wordsworth ? None but his imitators — and his imitators are read. "I have always regarded it as a bad symptom in a boy, if he had no powers of imitation ; he is destined to remain all his life a one-6ided character. He has no range of sympathies; he has been fused only 14 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH once in his life, and been poured into a mould, and there he cools, and he will never be other than you see him ; his creed on all mat ters is already formed; and you no more need hope to see mm changed, beneath the ordinary genial sympathies oi opinion or ol truth, than to find platina melt before an ordinary parlor lire. ine most promising boys are the most imitative ; in this lies their capa city for education. You can make Ciceros of them, Demostheneses of them, admirers ofthe ancients, admirers of the moderns, admirers of all men and of all things, that are deserving of admiration. Ihey are many-sided minds ; that is, you can impress many sides upon their minds ; they can admire the vigorous didactic of the philoso pher, pithy, unadorned,— sense and reason,— and they can be enrap tured by the sweet mellifluous strains— "the linked sweetness long drawn out " — of the most popular flowing authors. Unreflecting minds that observe these vertumni are apprehensive they may lose their identity, and end in their having no character at all ; but it is the very contrary of this, for it is just such youths at last that do have a character, a human, firm character; not that character Pope speaks of — "virtue fixed, but fixed as in a frost ; " — for, the basis on which their moral firmness at last reposes, is just as extensive as the points of sympathy and harmony in their minds were before numer ous. They are rational religious men, for their heads and hearts have both been actuated, but never sectarian ; they are mistrustful of their own views for they know that truth is a polygon, but the rapidity and justness of their survey soon brings them back to confidence ; they are sure that truth has a subsistence as well as an existence, for in endless variety they have constantly found that unity, which is the symbol of her Being, the Angel of her presence. " Having frequently appeared as a public speaker with distinguished success, he was requested by some of his friends to deliver a course of lectures during the winter of 1833-4, on such subjects as might best suit his own taste and inclination. He accordingly prepared a series of twelve lectures, embracing chiefly a view of the "Moral and Intellectual Constitution of Man;" but finding himself in the pre sence of a different and more promiscuous audience than he had anti cipated, he changed his original design, and delivered an entirely new course on the "Physical and Intellectual History of Man." Having devoted several of the preceding winters to the study of Anatomy, he was enabled to treat the first division of his subject,— the Physical History of Man, — with extraordinary success ; and he displayed a degree of anatomical knowledge, minuteness of observa tion, and philosophical induction, altogether surprising to most of his audience. But in the fall of the year following, he was brought still more prominently and favorably before the public by his elo quent and successful defence of the Ancient Classics, against the assaults of the distinguished Mr. Grimke, of South Carolina. This gentleman had commenced a war of extermination against the wri tings of antiquity, and with no inconsiderable success, was urging OF THE AUTHOR. 15 upon the public their rejection from a course of liberal education. The College of Teachers of the Mississippi Valley — an association which Kinmont had been highly instrumental in establishing — was at this time holding its annual session at Cincinnati; and here it was that this champion of an exclusively Jimcrican education encoun tered Kinmont in debate on the very subject nearest to his heart. None who were present at this conflict, (and it is estimated that there were near two thousand,) will ever forget the perfect tempest of elo quence which Kinmont poured forth on the head of his antagonist; it was in vain to resist so Demosthenean a charge; his forces were completely dissipated, and have never since been rallied. About this period, Kinmont resumed (after having laid aside for nearly two years) the office of expounding the Sacred Scriptures, and directing the services of religious worship', in behalf of a con siderable number of individuals, who formed a second Society of the New Church in Cincinnati. He continued in the regular perform ance of the duties of this office from that time onward to the close of his life. During the winter of 1S37-8, he delivered his last course of lec tures on the "Natural History of Man," which gave such universal gratification to his audience, that he was immediately requested to prepare a copy for publication; but this he could not find leisure to do before the subsequent summer. Retiring to the country during the annual vacation of his school in August, he employed himself in revising and correcting these lectures for the press, and had scarcely completed the task, when he was called to resume the duties of his profession. He entered upon them with alacrity, but scarcely a week had elapsed, when he was attacked by a fever, which, after an illness of about three weeks, terminated his mortal career, September 16th, 1838. Thus, in the full prime and vigor of manhood, was Kinmont re moved from the scene of his earthly labors; but the usefulness he nurtured by the cheerful performance of his duties while here, has now bloomed, we trust, and borne a rich and golden fruitage under far brighter and more congenial skies. In him were combined the scholar, the philosopher, the orator, the honest man, and devout christian. He was warmly attached to science and philosophy, be cause thereby he secured the means of his usefulness. He was always earnest and eloquent, for his language flowed from his heart, and he never meant other than he said. His duties as a christian and a teacher of religious truth were performed with the greatest humility, devotion, and zeal, for he felt that all the truths he pos sessed, and the ability to make them known to others, were alike gifts, which the obligations of duty urged him to present upon the altar of the common good. But no encomium or commendation is needed to ensure his remem brance ; for if the ideas of virtue and excellence are fashioned in the human mind by observation and reflection upon their personified 1 6 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF THE AUTHOR. forms in the acts and conduct of individuals; if, when we think of integrity, purity of heart, devoutness, independence of character, frankness, disinterestedness, and zeal for the public good, we picture to ourselves some person, in whom these virtues have been embodi ed, then will Kinmont recur, as often as they are presented to the minds of those who enjoyed his acquaintance, and experienced the benefit of his labors. They surely will feel with what justness it may be said of him : — cui Pudor, et Justitife soror Incorrupta Fides, nudaque Veritas Quando ullum inveniet pareml LECTURE THE FIRST; MAN CONSIDERED AS A UNIT. Design of these Lectures. — Uses and objects of Anthropology. — Just ideas im peded by partial and disconnected views, and discussions of the notional man of Philosophy and not the Idea of the Divine Mind. — Man to be studied in his Mind, his Body, and his Actions, the Human Trinity. — Gene ral view of him in the person of his History or Forthgoing — His Body, and thence his Mind. — Traces of the character of the Inward Man, upon its type, the body, not to he disregarded Natural impression of oneness, as to the organization of the Body. — Reasoning unaided by experience, utterly incapable of ascertaining its complex organization. — Bacon's first aphorism, illustrated. — Whence does that method of observation and induction become necessary to as? — Propriety of conjecture here with certain restrictions. — Passage from the Scientific to the Mystical — Application. — Probable adapta tion of the Nature within and without us — Hence, Nature is primarily epito mized on the Soul of Man : and the laws impressed upon it a priori, are, subsequent to birth, inculcated in a Teverse method, a poslerioribus adpriora. — Use of Theory. — Presentation of a theory, on this subject, from a Latin work of the last century. — Ancient mythus. — Reflections suggested thereby. — Formation of rational Ideas. — Conclusion. The science of human nature, which, to designate by a learned name, we might call Anthropology, is chiefly valuable as an introduction to the science of Deity, or divine nature, now familiarly known by the received term Theology. Man, we are informed, is made in " the image and likeness of God," (in which 3 18 LECTURE THE FIRST. words are contained more things than volumes could express), but if this be so, (and it is,) it would seem the part of wisdom, as well as of modesty, nrst dili gently to make ourselves acquainted with human na ture, before we begin to discourse, at least, on divine nature, for to know it, and revere it, and humbly to adore it, is not only the duty, but the very first duty of Man. A fonte principium;— from this fountain, and liv ing source of all right thoughts and pure desires, may every sentiment and idea of our lectures proceed. But with this acknowledgment and ascription of Good to its only origin, let us forthwith descend to a lower theme, and try whether we cannot in " the image and likeness," trace some of the more majestic lineaments of the original. For I do not intend in these lectures to deliver any formal science of human nature, far less any theory, which might indeed deserve the learned name of Anthropology; for such theory or perfect sci ence, I imagine, would be premature still, by many hundreds of centuries ; for after the lapse of the entire historical period of three thousand years, human nature, it seems to me, has not yet revealed the millionth part of its secrets or latent energies ; — all I intend, then, is but sketches, chiefly historical ones, of human nature, and these too not more in the character of a teacher, than as myself a learner ; — for in bringing together, in the form of lectures, as time and circumstances will permit, such notices of Man's natural history, as I can collect, or have noted, placing, as it were, the different parts of the subject in juxta-position, however remote in time or place, we may be able to make certain use ful inferences, or see, at least, the dawnings, of certain grand conclusions, which will conduct to the Christian NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 19 Religion, not through tradition or pre-judgment, but through fact, experience, and rational demonstration. Just and adequate conceptions of Human Nature, it seems to me, have been very much hindered by the partial and disconnected modes in which it has been handled. One writer undertakes to explain the philo sophy of the body, another that of the mind ; — on the last division, one perhaps chooses for his theme the intellectual, another the moral powers; — the physical history, in like manner, is separated from the civil his tory; and thus, although much has been well written on all these various subjects, yet no general or con nected view is presented of the Whole Man. To attempt such a view indeed, would be a gigantic en terprise, and such perhaps as we may despair to see accomplished by any one person ; — but still those, who would entertain just, if not very systematic ideas re specting man, should, at least, combine all the various subjects together in their thoughts, if not in their modes of treating them, and that whole, which will at last arise before their minds, will doubtless be more true to nature, if not to system, than the views which a more regular discussion, or artificial contemplation of the subject might ever suggest to them. For, as Bacon has pithily observed, non leve quiddam interest, inter humanae mentis idola et divints mentis ideas, — the dif ference is not small, between the idols of the human mind and the ideas of the divine mind, that is, between the notions and arbitrary landmarks of Men, instituted on nature, and those veritable distinctions and signatures which are originally impressed upon her. And these arbitrary and notional distinctions have not only infested physical science, to which Bacon al ludes, but still more, the science of human nature, 20 LECTURE THE FIRST. and also theology. For instance, that universal distinc tion of Man into soul and body, is undoubtedly recog nizable in nature, whatever objection may be brought against either of the terms used to designate it : ot the distinction itself, all savage and civilized language bears ample evidence ; it is a distinction, which we feel, and of which no mode of reasoning can deprive us; but when on the gound of this distinction, we introduce others, and speak of "the immortality of the soul, as distinct and separate from every idea of a body, we are, unconsciously to ourselves, discussing a notion or idol of abstract philosophy, transmitted to us from the Greek schools,— and not an "idea of the Divine Mind," or a truth, which has its signature and stamp on the nature of Man ; for the "idea of the Divine Mind," here, as appears from revelation, is the resurrection of Man from the dead, — Man, I say, as known to us,— embo died, yet spiritually ;— this is the " idea of God,"— and the signature of the same idea, as revealed on Nature, is to be seen on the mind of the savage, and the un- philosophical civilized man, who each in the simplicity of their hearts, (and there is truth in that simplicity,) still cling even to the very forms and persons of the dear departed good and kind, whose very bodies, but O how changed, seem to them more beautiful and bright than ever. — "We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed." I beg leave then to say, that in the course of these lectures, I shall as far as possible, keep this idea or impression of Man before me, that is, of a being, to be contemplated under two natural hemispheres of dis tinction, Mind and Body, on the latter of which shines the Sun of nature, on the other that better Light, which is " the True," — but what God has joined in- NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 21 dissolubly together, I shall not, in philosophical notion- ality, put asunder; — for although the terrestrial portion of the body resign its vitality, I must still, as a matter of faith, believe that the spiritual or essential body is not so extinct, but wears the image of that " heavenly" which arose. This simple and natural view of the subject will save us a world of trouble ; — we shall be rid, at once, of all those absurd and vague definitions about the mind and soul, which are purely abstract and notional, and shall see constantly before us, a real Man, at each turn of our discourse, clad in the sensible hab iliments of beauty and majesty, which meet us now, and which, I believe, will always meet us in every possible stage of his future existence. Si in hoc erro, libenter erro, nee mihi hunc errorem, dum vivo, ex- torqueri volo. Man, however, as he stands unveiled before us in that Divine Form, in which we know him, (for we need not scruple to call it divine, in the sense in which it is the image of Him, who was the image of the Invisible,) in this form alone, we could not have under stood him, or seen a legible portraiture of his faculties. The mind and body are two, an indissoluble two; but the actions are the third, and the commentary, which explain the other, and render their relations and energies, their faculties, visible and invisible — lucid, distinct, and although not completely comprehensible, yet measurably apprehensible. It is the kinds of actions which man performs, or which he aspires to perform, or which he has the conscious ability to per form, which explain the reasons of his peculiar bodily structure, or the characters and singularities of his men tal endowments. What folly it is to attempt to unfold the reason of these, but from his actions; — it is the 22 LECTURE THE FIRST. energy of Man, his action on objects beyond him, which interprets to us the unseen mind, and makes known the life and efficiency of the body. It is this trinity of Man, (for Man is the image of his God, in whom is the essential Trinity,) under which his whole character must be studied ;— if you take either person or aspect of his character separately, that of his mind, or his body, or his history, (his forth-going,) you have but a third of your subject before you. If viewed under the person of his mind alone, he is absolutely inscruta ble, and hence the barrenness of mere mental philoso phy, a farrago of notions, a tissue of terms ; — if contem plated under the person of the body, you have a steady view, but when in his history also, a complete one. Look then at his history broadly, — (in detail, I shall present parts of it hereafter,) — you are astonished at the number of his arts, the complication of his actions, the millions of designs, that have been struck out by him, the millions of contrivances, which have been adopted to accomplish them, — and all that too, within the compass of one age, within the limits of one nation: — unroll that chart of human history until a second age appear, — a third, — a fourth; — the same complication of arts, designs, successful or abortive efforts, still ; but each successive age marked with new features, peculiar, its own ; — what immensity of ideas, what mutability also ! — and all this, perhaps, in one nation, in one little spot of earth: — take another nation, — a third, — a fourth, the same endless complications and variety still discovered ! Now, this is an aspect of Man in the person of his history, his efficiency, his forth-going ; — forthwith revert to the second person of Man, the body ;— bid the Anatomist and the Physiologist unfold to you this, and he will show you here combination NATLRAL HISTORY OF MAN. 23 and number, and designs and arts and functions, of which the analogies of human history are but shadows. How many designs or separate scopes or ideas of art, think you, could be counted in the human arm alone, which has achieved the deeds of history. The splendor and number of all the artificial achievements sink into insignificance, before that constellation of glorious divine arts, which have been lavished on the human hand alone, not to speak of the other parts of the body. But yet these shadows of Man's power first lead us to the bright exemplars of essential art; we are led to ad mire the model from the success of the imitation. And in the actions of Man, the powers of the body are un derstood, and in both combined, the mind or soul is at last, justly manifested. And herein, indeed, is the very citadel of Humanity : — it is a " consuming fire," when viewed in itself abstractedly, scorching and dissipating all the vain speculations, which from age to age have been clustering around it alone, to invade its secrecy, or to pollute its vestals ; but still in a salutary manner making itself known in the body, through its functions and actions. On this type of the soul, I mean the body, and its actions, let us steadily fix our attention in the prose cution of our inquiries, and if we can catch thence any oracular response respecting the real character of the inward Man, or that assemblage of his spiritual facul ties, called the mind, let us not be heedless of such in formation, but endeavor, to the best of our abilities, to interpret them aright. The path of inquiry is distinct; let us mark a few of its bearings. When we consult our own consciousness only, in re gard to the organization of the body, we receive hardly any other impression from this source, but that of unity 24 LECTURE THE FIRST. or oneness, and when the mind is sound and the health good, this impression is only the more entire and unblemished. The pervading sentiment of the unso phisticated mind, the natural language of our feelings, (philosophy and observation apart,) is, that the being, which we designate I, — is one and indivisible. This is the silent and unequivocal testimony of nature, mani fested to our own unreflecting consciousness, — of the unity of Man, — an echo, as it were, of the voice of God himself, proclaiming his own unity in us. Inde pendently of experience and observation, that is, from mute consciousness alone, we should have no knowl edge of that wonderful complication of organs, and their functions, which lie concealed within the interior of the frame. With respect to that vital blood itself, which circulates in every part of our body, we should have no knowledge of its existence, far less of its color, its aliment, or its uses, but from experience. It is true, we might feel that we were strengthened by food or enfeebled by long fasting, and hence we could cer tainly infer, that food was necessary to our existence, while we were also sensible of an appetite for it im planted by nature, but in what manner it strengthened our bodies, by what means it was made to contribute to that end, our own unassisted consciousness could never have informed us. Let us suppose, then, a person of mature mind, well informed in all other respects, but who, from some cause or other, had never been led to think on the or ganization of his own body,— let us suppose also, that he has been of such perfect health, as never to have ex perienced any of those morbid sensations, which first convey to us the idea, that our body is composed of many parts, liable to peculiar affections, (for it is dis- NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 25 ease, which first obscures the delightful impression of the unity of our system, and introduces the sense of multitude,) but, for once, let us suppose a person of sound health, and good understanding, totally unin formed on the subject, to have sat down to reflect on the hidden organs within his own body, their forms and uses, in regard to food and drink, how these con tributed to strength or refreshment ; or the air, which he inspired, how it affected his system, or by what organs it was received, and what their complexion and relations; what definite information on all these points could his unaided reflections afford him ? — Among the thousand theories and conjectures, which he might form, would one of them be true to the facts? — could his rea son alone, (without other aids,) inform him, that there was even such a thing as blood in his body, much less that it is circulated in every part of it, in tubes con structed expressly for the purpose, and with that vital art, so truly admirable? Could his most ingenious reasoning, or most lively fancy have presented him with a true picture of the lungs, or of the nervous sys tem; — could he have seen the liver, the spleen, the heart, and all their connections, and relations and ad justments? When you reflect, how impossible it would be for him, by reasoning alone, to have discov ered all these wonders, or to construct other than the most foolish hypotheses in regard to them, theories the most wide of the truth, you will feel the value and justness of Bacon's first aphorism in the Novum Orga- num, wilich is to this amount that Man, the minister and interpreter of nature, can advance no farther in knowledge or in action, than as he has observed the order of Nature, exhibited in sensible fact, or declared by legitimate induction ; or, in other words, we might 4 J; LECTURE THE FIRST. y, that the true doctrine of nature, is to be derived om the letter itself of nature, and established thereon, and, that all reasonings, and opinions, independent of this source, and sole criterion of their truth, founded on speculation alone, without previous observation, are as worthless in natural science, as those theories in theol ogy, built upon fancies not facts, on the suggestions of the human mind, not on the solid texts of literal Scripture. But Bacon's expression is: quantum de naturae ordine, re vel mente observaverit, etc. ; the order of nature, observed as sensible fact, or deduced as un doubted inference from fact before known. This is easily comprehended by a familiar illustration. — A navigator arrives at an unknown country, and sails up a channel, which he finds to be a river, an immense body of fresh water, rolling onwards to the ocean ; he sees at once in his mind's eye, a great expanse of coun try, from which it is supplied ; and his inference here is as certain in regard to the extent, as if he had already traversed it, and seen it with his bodily eyes : — it is a deduction from a previous order of nature, already known. But in the case of the philosophical adult, I have supposed, he is ignorant as yet altogether of a certain peculiar order of nature, I mean, that order of nature, established by the Deity in the animal frame, that system and arrangement of organs and their functions, according to which an animal body is maintained in its being and use. Here, having no previous knowl edge or experience to guide him, what is he to do? To ask of his reason to inform him a priori, how God has constructed a living body?— his reason could not give the most distant knowledge, apart from experience and observation ; the best office of his reason in such a NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 27 case, is to say to him, "go and see." And we shall suppose then, that he follows that bidding, that he inquires, that he traces the facts, that he reads the letters of this sacred Scripture of nature, and being but an inexpert scholar, he takes perhaps a Harvey to guide him, the Apostle of the circulation of the blood, — and other teachers also he calls to his aid, and then it is, at last, that the true system of nature begins to be revealed to him, — facts, new and unexpected, divine and pecu liar, appear one after another, and awaken admiration and astonishment. These are no longer idols of his own mind, but ideas of the Divine Mind. What was his first obscure consciousness respecting his own body? That it was simply a unit, that it was an organ of uses, and that the organ was one, — and this impression science does not destroy, but rather confirms ; but by experience, and observation, and analysis, she now shows, that this unit consists of many parts, or rather, to speak of hidden function, of many distinct systems of parts, which act in concert, producing that general unity, manifested to the consciousness, of which the material type is the body, and the mental expression, that person, whom we denominate, 1, — Thou, — or by other similar epithet. Among the many systems, which constitute this unit, he discovers to his joy several, already clearly defined and exhibited, through the industry and eagle-eyed sagacity of science, — the system of digestion, embracing several minor systems, the dual system of the greater and lesser circulations, a provision for the distribution of the blood, and the depuration of the blood ; the system of respiration, con nected with the renovation of the blood, as a partial end, and with other, perhaps, still higher ends, as yet little understood, — lastly, the system of nerves, whose 28 LECTURE THE FIRST. function is of the greatest dignity, although the mode of operation is not yet connected with any known prin ciple of science. All these, (farther enumeration is unnecessary,) observation brings to light, reasoning without it, never could. But, what is most wonderful, each of these systems has its own peculiar organ, which corresponds with the function, and its own appropriate centre, in which its unity is enthroned, as it were, and rendered visible. Thus, the centre of respiration is the lungs, but the action touches and verges on every other function of the body, — the centre of circulation, the heart, — the centre of digestion, the stomach, — the centre of nervous animation, the head ; all these also science and observation point out ; all these great doctrines of uature are drawn from the literal reading of nature's manuscript, and established on this basis of experience. For, as an illustration, after we had known even some thing of the use and function of respiration, could we still have known from reasoning, that such an organ as the lungs, was the necessary and proper one to dis charge it ? After we have seen it, and have known that it performs this function, we say that it is the right one, and we feel, as if it would be impossible, that it could be other than it is, but still we can give no other reason, but this very abstract one, that the Deity must have selected what is fittest, and we say therefore, and here we rest, that the organ corresponds exactly with the use, and the use with the organ. But still antecer dently to all experience, we could not from the sight of the organ, have inferred, what was its use, nor yet from the use being given, have determined a priori, what kind of organ the Deity would have selected to perform it ; we only could have said, that we did not doubt, that he would select the best, and here we would NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 29 have been right ; but even this is an inference, which has grown with our growth, and strengthened with our strength, from the fact, that we innately perceive, that the acts of the Deity are all perfectly wise and good ; so that even this anticipation is the result of ex perience, although grounded on nature itself. Similar observations to tliese will apply to all the organs of the body, as, for example, to the eye. What more does the uninstructed rustic know of it, but just this one thing, that he sees with it, or perhaps this addi tional piece of science to grace his knowledge, namely, that if he shut his eyelids, he does not see ; of any intri cacy of structure in the eye, or even of any necessity of such intricacy, he has no conception. Science reveals the first, that is, the intricacy of the structure, but with respect to the latter, the necessity of it, even she is blind, unless so far as she sees, that it has relation to. certain laws of light which have been discovered. But in regard to the ear, an organ equally intricate, she may be said to be altogether nonplused, for the laws of sound being less known than the laws of light, the relations between the mechanism of the ear, and the vibrations of sound, are hardly in the least degree un derstood. — But we pursue not these hints farther now. Mark then the result. We supposed a person of mature understanding, well acquainted with the order of nature in other particulars, but totally ignorant of the order of nature, as respected the formation and working of the animal body ; and we have shown, that antecedently to even a shadow of experience, all his conjectures would have been worthless; and indeed, we might have proved this, from the actual fact of the groundless and insane theories, that have been from time to time broached, even by philosophers, on this 30 LECTURE THE FIRST. very subject, — attempting to be wise above what is done, or rather, without what is done ; — but we suffer all that to pass, for we hasten to the second grand feature of this subject. Observe, the expression of Bacon is, that man knows only so much of the order of nature, quantum re vel mente observaverit, so much as he has noticed in fact and in reason, that is, by rational and certain deduc tion from fact. The first we have already explain ed ; — we have supposed, that our grown-up philosopher has made himself acquainted in fact, with a peculiar order of nature, of which he was before ignorant, namely, that order constituted in an animal body; — this then is a fact, and a fact of a new kind come to his knowledge ; — is it a barren one, or is it produc tive? — I say, it is productive, and of immense and endless inferences, which can now be rationally de duced from it ; — now comes the second part of Bacon's aphorism ; he has observed in fact, he can now observe with his reason. He has looked into an animal body, and understood much of the great laws of its func tions;— the animal he has inspected, is one of a certain class, species, or genus; but now from the laws of order of animal life, in one instance, he can infer what they will be, as to their general bearings in any other : if a new quadruped is presented to him, after a glance at its form, he can tell that he will find therein a heart, a circulation of the blood, lungs for respiration, a nervous system, a vertebrated column, that arched mechanism of the spine, namely,— and in all these, it is impossible he shall be disappointed; the inferance here, is just as certain, as the sensible fact was before ; if he theorises about the specific peculiarites of the lungs or heart in this unknown case, he may be mis- NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 31 taken, but as respects the grand laws of order of animal life, he cannot. Why ? — Because the doctrines of that order are written in palpable characters on every ani mal, and he has read these letters and has grounded his faith thereon : his faith is founded on a rock, — on the stability of nature, and cannot be overthrown. It might be easy to extend the illustrations of this great principle to much length, but I forbear; each one's own mind will suggest numerous applications. For instance, the inferences drawn from astronomy are perfectly certain, if the facts are surely established. Provided it be established, that the planets are earths like our own, — of such magnitude, — and revolving around the sun as ours; that the order of planetary existence, as to its grand laws, should also be similar in other respects to that which prevails here, seems a matter of unavoidable inference; the three depart ments of nature, the vegetable, the animal, the mineral, are there already either in fact, or in embryo, in potency: a darkness may brood over the face of the deep on one or more of those rolling worlds still, but the Seven Days of symmetrical and finished creation will yet cover their bosoms with all the luxuriancy and beauty of animated nature ; their Time will come, if it has not already ; such laws of creation the science of geology makes known to us. We seem then, to have arrived at the following conclusions : 1 . That the plan or order adopted by nature, in the prosecution of her designs, commonly called laws of nature, can never be ascertained in the first instance, unless by observation and experiment, with more or less of the exercise of the reasoning faculty. 2. That when such plan or order or general law 32 LECTURE THE FIRST. has been once ascertained, we have an innate conviction respecting it, that nature will not capriciously abandon it, whatever modifications, for the sake of use and variety, she may introduce, so as occasionally to veil, but never to extinguish the principle. This last conclusion is extremely valuable, and is the Peter or Rock, on which the Temple of Science is built, the emblem of its immutability, and eternal duration. We shall see farther illustrations of it in succeeding lectures. Could we understand the constitution of our be ing, — our elementary Nature, — how it has been made up, and what impressions withal are fixed upon it in its first formation, we should then, perhaps, understand also, how this method of observation and induction becomes necessary to us. But there is here a wide field of discovery yet unexplored ; — all we can do here is to collect certain probabilities, and form conjectures, which have a semblance of reason; — and this is not forbidden, provided we do not magnify our guesses into the importance of absolute truth. When we are sure, that certain grand laws of nature are at work in the production of beautiful results, it serves at least to keep the magnificence of her plans steadily before our eyes, to form some idea or conjecture concerning them, for in this manner the spirit of nature, as it were, is brought into contact with our spirit, and we are improved by the intercourse. For, it seems to me, if I were certain that I were in the presence of some eminent personage, distinguished for his wisdom and goodness, for example, a Plato, an Archimedes, or a Fenelon, merely to hear him speak, and to catch the tones of his voice, although his words were unintelligible, would inspire me with a certain sense NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 33 of grandeur, an inexplicable feeling of delight. And indeed, there must always be certain signs of great ness, which in such a case, strike every mind. And so it is, in the contemplation of many of the grand acts of nature ; we often cannot interpret them, or rather we never fully understand them, but still the idea that it is nature we contemplate, encompassed as she ever is, with the many sweet tokens of greatness and benevo lence, makes a good, a just and rational impression always, upon our hearts and understandings. And the more profound and inscrutable the subject is, the more readily and sweetly does the scientific melt into the mystical ; and God, if not the method of his work, stands awfully and impressively revealed before us. And such, in a pre-eminent degree, must always be the tenor of our feelings, when we reflect upon the origin of our being, and the laws which are impressed upon our souls, at the first formation. Say, then, how is it here? — is it actually true, that certain faculties of reading God's laws at an advanced period of our life, are impressed upon our forms, while still in embryo, as our eyes and ears are moulded and cast in the womb, with reference to that light and those vibrations of the atmosphere, which have not yet reached that region of our mysterious creation? How remarkable,how won derful this provision ; it is a physical one ; — the doors, the portals are formed, and nicely proportioned for those guests, that are to enter, — the sound and the light; and is it then safe, on this analogy, to declare, that the architect of nature, — " The former of Man in the womb," — has also constituted in our being, when first struck, the faculties and organs, for the reception of all those truths and mystic laws, which the soul is designed to read, when in the world of external nature, 5 34 LECTURE THE FIRST. it becomes adolescent ?— And is it a fact, that the pat terns of things without exactly tally with the counter parts within, which have been there,--moulded on our being from the first? And what is this knowledge, this science of things, which we afterwards receive with such delight ; is it but a result of the meeting and congratulation of natures so congenial, and true,— the nature within, and the nature without us, fitted and adapted to each other by the will of the same benefi cent Creator? Should this be so, or aught similar thereto, then the ascertaining of the facts and laws of creation, were but the renovation of the impressions originally made on the soul by God,— the mutual in- aptation of congenial natures,— but that of Man active, this of external creation passive. And so all nature had been originally inscribed, as in epitome, on the soul of Man, and hence on the brain, — on its start on the career of existence. And these truths or laws were impressed upon it (ere he was yet intelligently conscious of them) a priori; and this the golden age of heavenly thought, of which now the bare dream is left him ; — for ever after, that is, subsequent to birth, the inculcation of truth, and laws, and knowledge, is in the reverse method, or by induction, namely, a posteri- oribus ad priora, from effects to their causes. You will perceive, that in all this, I am but present ing a theory, or rather but an assemblage of images, and that 1 fail in giving any true account of the forma tion of the human soul, or the reasons, whereon are grounded the natural and established method of its at taining knowledge ; — nevertheless, every theory or form of words or speculations, which can bring the stu pendous facts of nature more before us, the curious tissue of Man's original creation, and the progressive NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 35 development of his soul, is useful and to be encou raged, as you may peep over the shoulders of these theories or speculations themselves constantly, at the mystical array of sublime and holy truths, which thus cast their majestic shadows before them, — on the ves tibules of our souls, as we would in vain essay to enter the temple. It may not be uninteresting to you, therefore, merely for the sake of keeping the facts a little longer before you, in a few words to state a theory on this subject, which I find in a Latin work, published in Germany, in the middle of the last century, I believe, little known, and never translated ; and so to leave the mat ter to your own reflections, for our minds seem to know more here, than our philosophy can express ; for it is a question which belongs to both worlds, — and half of it in darkness, and half of it in light. The author I speak of, distinguishes the two states of human life, that which is antecedent to birth, and that which is consequent. In the former, the lungs enjoy a certain sweet and tranquil slumber, and the brain is the chief or only source of bodily animation ; but this condition of existence, which seems to us so imperfect, is yet nearer to a Divine Perfection than the other, because it is the essential type of creation, which is effected a priori ad posterius, the external parts being moulded from an internal and vital energy. And during this state, foreign or outward causes are allowed to exercise no disturbing influences, and hence the symbols of the divine ideas on the divine work itself are here impressed in their natural and proper order and arrangement. The oracles of nature are written on our being, as it was anciently reported, that the responses of the Sibyl were marked or dotted on the 36 LECTURE THE FIRST. leaves of trees, carefully arranged within her grotto, but no sooner was the least blast of air admitted on the intrusion of the curious, than the whole was dispersed and thrown into confusion: " Inconsulti abeunt, sedemque odere Sibylla? : — Very similar is it on the birth of man ;— the perfect and unsullied order of God, is now to suffer discom posure ;— the lungs and their organs of expression now become the external tablets of the soul, for impressions are now received from without, and the original copy of our ideas on the soul itself is no longer such as to be legible; but still it is preserved, although all the characters are confused. Hence, the dark state of man on his first entrance into the world ; — all is now to be done by himself in a reverse order, that is, a pos terior ad prius, which was before so much more brightly and graphically executed on his first creation. The lungs, which before were passive, now become signally active, and speech, and tones, and looks, — their peculiar work, now appear the substitutes of the brain and its actions, which held before the most conspicuous place in the system, and exercised undivided sway. But still the lungs at last are found to be but the external agents or ministers of the brain itself; — and they hold, as it were, a mediatorial office between the inward world of Man, and the outward world of nature. The atmosphere, on the one hand, seems to excite and impel them, as if nature were here gaining the supremacy ; but the brain, on the other, or rather, the soul through the brain, vindicates its title to origi nal dominion, and by re-action on the mechanism of breathing, expels all foreign and adventitious influen ces, and shows demonstrably, that the lungs, with all their appurtenances, are but its instruments. And NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 37 here is an image, as in a mirror, of the inductive phi losophy and analytical reasoning. The soul after birth, seems necessitated to derive all its ideas from without, and to be no longer capable of moulding them according to the forms of its own original creation; but the appearance is fallacious, for it is indeed certain, that external nature seems to impress itself on the soul, and to leave thereon prints of itself, as the atmosphere rushes on the lungs, and seems to be the cause of their action ; but in either case, there is a power above and superior to outward nature, and it is the true and original power; and, rightly to speak, the outward world is not constituted the cause, but only the occa sion of those ideas, whose materials make up the whole fabric of our knowledge, and wisdom, and power, and that too, a knowledge, a wisdom, and power, which is cemented and held vitally together, by that same mysterious Power, which even without any act of ours at all, originally formed our bodies so perfectly and so beautifully. The induction then of knowledge, aposteriore ad prius, is an indispensable work of Man, according to the present constitution of his being; but it supposes also, in every instance of its exercise, the simultaneous exertion of a higher Power, whose mode of action has been from the first, and ever will be, a priori ad posterius, and this power is Divine and creative, and indeed alone is, — the other only seems to be, or exists from its action. In this manner are reconciled the jarring contentions of the schools, and the apparent discord of nature itself, in the beautiful harmony of the human system, the illustrious triumph of divine art. — His mediis ad mentem nostram supe- riorem seu ad animam enitimur, quae tunc obvia fit, et infundit potentiam: quantum enim his instructi 38 LECTURE THE FIRST. alis ascendimus, tantum Mens ista ad nos descendit, et suis talaribus nostras alas implicat, et amplectitur, ac docet ideas nostras in rationes, et rationes in analyses convertere: id etenim, non corporeum est, quare nee id a sensibus trahimus sed a potentia, quae a sphaera supra nostram, in nostram influit. From this admirable constitution of our nature it has arisen, namely, from the endowment of a superior and inferior mind, acting in concert, that we are enabled, through experiments and the sciences, our auxiliaries, to ele vate our souls, as it were, on the wings of nature, while to meet us in our flight, a higher mind descends equipped as Mercury with golden sandals and winged feet, which forthwith embraces us, and infolding its pinions in ours, raises us, at length, into an atmos phere of serene intelligence, where our sensual ideas become rational, and yield the pure truths of analysis, — the product not of the body or the senses, but of that Power, which is above them, and influences all our thoughts, without ever being confounded with them. But let us here leave the subject; — enough is said to excite reflection. Where facts are clear and certain, let us tread with firm foot ; where the process is less known, let us endeavor, at least, to obtain glimpses of the wonders which are presented to our contempla tion. Let us entertain implicit faith in nature, and the Divine Author; with regard to the suggestions of our own minds, let us admit them with caution, but not altogether reject them; they are, at least, prognostica tions of truth, and may sometimes lead to its discovery. LECTURE THE SECOND ; ON THE LIMITS AND ORDERS OF NATURE. The operations of the Deity, in nature, are graduated and progressive ; hence our ability to apprehend them. — Gradation observed in the progress of the human mind : sense, fancy, imagination, reason. — Summary of preceding lecture Ideas suggested to the ancients by the observation of the visible universe. — Some philosophers, from a general resemblance, have classed Man with animals ; others have considered animals machines Scientific analyses are but indications of things, not the things. — Limits sacred in nature Xo combination of mechanical or chemical agencies constitute ani mal action. — Supremacy of the animal over these. — Review. — That as animals, by virtue of the laws of animal life, are distinguished from the lower depart ments of nature, so Man, by reason of human laws, should constitute a separate order. — Enumeration of the progressive orders in nature. — That when any of the lower orders are assumed by a higher, they become identified with it ; thus, whatever of the animal or organical there is in Man, is emi nently human : all is Man. — Further illustration. — Supremacy of the human obviously marked in the body, especially the hand, the lungs, and the mouth . — C onclusion. There is the twilight or dawn, the deep light, the sunrise, and the blaze of day. Such is the series of preparatory events, through which nature, in one department of her works, moves forwards to the accomplishment of her purposes. And here what softness and gentleness, and yet resolution, so to speak, 40 LECTURE THE SECOND. do we see in this natural procedure ; — all is graduated, yet all is decisive. There is nothing hurried, yet no end is defeated. Again, observe how the winter passes into spring, with what contention between heat and cold, each meekened in the struggle; — how imper ceptibly then steals on the summer, and next, the maturity of autumn. The law is fulfilled, the end of the production of fruit and vegetation, and the joy of animated nature is secured, but it is through a succes sion of regulated movements. I choose these illustrations, such as are familiar to every one, and on a magnificent scale, that it may be distinctly recognised that Deity (for there are surely instances of its wisdom and works,) pursues even its ends, according to certain established laws; and although invested with omnipotence, dispenses not with the progress of means, so that, step by step, as if it could not otherwise be accomplished, the purposed end is at last effected. It is by this visible use of means, and the employment, as it were, of tools in the accomplishment of its ends, that the existence of Deity is brought at length within the scope of our apprehensions, and rendered an intimate conviction of our reason. It is in this manner that even in nature, after a certain sense, and in an obscure degree, Deity seems to be invested with attributes of hu manity ; condescends to effect its objects, through arts and instruments, and in definite periods of time, clothing itself in weakness, so as to meet human apprehension, and thereby elevate human nature;— for surely, it is not an impossible supposition, that omnipotence might accomplish ends, without such profusion of means, or such delay and tedium in the consummation. We can conceive, at least, that NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 41 food might have been otherwise created, and that it might have been perfected in an instant, without this vegetative elaboration of many months. Such a sup position, or conception, is sometimes necessary to be made, in order to fix our attention more vividly on the actual law of nature, and particularly on this character of gradation, or established series, which is perfectly distinct in the physical world, but not so much so, be cause not so well noticed, in the intellectual and moral world. But yet it may be seen also in the human miud, although the terms to designate it, are not so easily found, nor so happy and expressive. Neverthe less, the terms sense, fancy, imagination, reason, might serve vaguely to describe the progress also of the human mind towards its first, or natural maturity. And each of these also, in their order, is the ground, or continent, of all that succeed. Thus sense is the first rude germ or crust of the fancy, for fancy is, as it were, the full-fledged bird, excluded from the confinements of nature, and the limited notices of the senses, and soaring aloft, unrestrained in the luxuries of its new being ; then succeeds imagination, a more regulated fancy, that emulates the work of reason, while it borrows also the hues of its immediate parent; — and reason, what is that, but the full and perfect development at last, of all that sense ori ginally contained, fancy decorated, and imagination designed into a thousand forms. But reason com bines the whole, and from the whole, through the light of the supreme Mind, at length deduces and establishes her conclusions. Can we say, that the progression here ends, or that there begins anew the monotonous round? There are auguries of quite the contrary, — there is the vital spark, the punctum 6 42 LECTURE THE SECOND. saliens of a new Being, of which each true Man is conscious, which forbids the harboring of such un worthy surmises. But not yet is it the proper point in our course to refer to, or unfold these evidences. We must proceed according to a more regulated plan. But still certain anticipations are necessary, and as nature shows certain indications of her mature ends, even in the earliest spring, in plants, whose buds and germs unfold themselves, ere yet the snows have fled ; so it were right also, to take occasional and premature glances of certain advanced parts of a sub ject, in order that our progress towards the end may be the more cheerful and unerring. On this account, I opened many topics in the last lecture, rather discursively, choosing thus to take a view, wide at least, although a dim one, of the many bearings of our subject. And to recapitulate some of these may not be amiss; — a fresh view may discover new features, or make a more natural and genuine impression of the whole. The extent and vastness of the subject was shown. That man in the popular sense was the theme, not the rational man of philosophy, but the natural man of all ages and nations,— man, an undivided being, but naturally composed of body and soul,— seen in mate rial grandeur embodied to the eye of sense, in spiri tual grandeur to the eye of Faith, but a man in either case, not a mental phantom, which philosophy would make of him,— the Greek, Roman, or Scotch, whose abstractions are not worth any attention. That of this man, so beheld, that is, incorporated, and sur rounded with the trophies of his actions, the living and visible memorials of his power, the contemplation NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 43 was sublime ; — for it is a true image of Deity, which we behold. That the number and extent of his arts, the tokens of his skill, the vestiges or wrecks of his plans, and the scope of his intelligence, as reviewed on the page of history, seem utterly amazing and beyond all computation, but yet as nothing in con trast with that creative Wisdom, and the signs of it, and their number, which are lavished so gloriously and so strikingly on the constitution of his frame. That therefore the skill of Man has not yet trans posed into his history, the millionth part of that art, and that intelligence alone, of which his own body is the transcript ; and that he, for whose material form merely, so much has been done, and who has him self done so little in comparison, may still be looked upon as not having exhausted even the infinitesimal part of all his resources. That therefore although there is much behind, there is still more before; the variety and intricacy of the arts of design, expressed in the body, is a prophecy and pledge of this. That still this variety is one and felt as such by our con sciousness, — and so entire is this sense of oneness or unity, that we have no natural or instinctive impres sion whatever of the number of organs and functions in the interior of our frame. That we become ac quainted with these by experience, and through sci ence, and that science even yet has made but little progress in revealing or expounding them ; — but there are the summa fastigia rerum, — some of the most striking features, or even the general systems of the animal economy revealed; — that these, constitute to those who read them, the literal texts of this part of the sacred Scripture of Nature, — the gospel of God according to the animal kingdom, — which we could 44 LECTURE THE SECOND. never have known, but by actual inspection : — that it has its own peculiar laws or order impressed upon it which are certain to be found wherever the animal kingdom extends, and having discovered the general type of these laws in one or two instances, we can pre dict with certainty in regard to others. That therefore the inductive philosophy of Bacon reigns supreme here, as in every other department of nature, — re vel mente observamus, — our observation extends to the facts or the laws of the facts logically inferred. But that the system of laws cannot be transferred from their place in one department of nature, to explain or declare what must be those which prevail in another, that wherever the animal kingdom extends, the type of its known laws may ahvays be expected to be found ; but to look for them also in the mineral kingdom, or other province of nature toto ccelo distinct, is preposterous and contrary to the spirit of rational inquiry; each division of nature has its own laws, as each animal has its own form ; — this vaulting philosophy is therefore to be avoided, nor must we seek analogies, unless where nature has clearly established them. The absurdity of it may be seen in the ideas of some of the Greek philsophers, that the earth is an animal, and the stars intelligent : — all this is preposterous. I next adverted to the creation of the human being, as a kind of type or natural illustration of the true method of philosophizing, or the necessity of it; for although during the formation of the body, while it is entirely under the divine Hands, and not yet delivered over to the possessor by the First Artist, the progress of mystic and ineffable creation be from what is prior to what is posterior, a priore ad posterius, the brain being the former, the lungs the latter, yet after birth, NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 45 when the golden age has ceased and the iron age commences, the order is reversed, at least apparently, so. that the brain seems now to depend on the lungs for vital action, although at first, it was evidently other wise. The same reversed order is now also established in the senses ; — the material contacts of objects, are made the first occasions, through which the latent powers of reason, and understanding are excited, and he who attempts to act independent of matter or natu ral experience, by a mere spiritual intuition, is running counter to the stern laws which the Deity has appointed for the government of the world, at least in this terres trial sphere. That, therefore, the first obscure rudi ments of thinking and feeling must be laid in every one within the domains of external nature, that the eye has to be moulded to perfect vision, and the ear conformed to distinct sound, and the touch and all the other senses to be brought into harmony and just correspondence with their appropriate objects, ere reason can obtain a place, on which even her foot may rest, in the external constitution of Man; — but that after this preparation of the way, the greater and nobler powers of his mind are unfolded, those spiritual energies, namely, which were constituted in the very dawn of his being, in the golden age of his existence. Thus reasoning then is still to all appearance in every man a posteriore ad prius, from an effect to its cause, from sensible objects to ideas, but yet in reality, and in just language, all reasoning essentially such, is a priore ad posterius, from within to without, from ideas to objects. This will be obscure to some, but farther explanation would be tedious. And perhaps it will clear up the whole mat ter, simply to remark, that the appearance that respira tion, the external action of the lungs, controls the 46 LECTURE THE SECOND. whole body even to the heart and brain, which would be an instance of a vital action proceeding a posteriore ad prius, is in fact fallacious, and that the truth is just the reverse, namely, that it is the brain itself, which through nerves of respiration controls every act of breathing, and that too, whether we be asleep or awake. Awake, we can retain our breathing ad libi tum, or direct it to the various acts of speech; in sleep appropriate nerves discharge a similar function. In fact then, pulmonic life, even although it appears not so at first, is still under the government of cerebral life, and hence results that concordia discors, that recon ciliation of apparent contradictions which not only in this department of nature, but in many others besides, shines forth so conspicuously. Such is a brief summary of the main ideas of our first lecture. I now proceed to another topic, — some of the more general points of obvious distinction be tween man and the animal creation, and also the out ward tokens, by which this last stands marked off, from the mere mechanical or inert parts of nature. And here I must premise, that the subject may seem dry ; — but yet it cannot be such to those, who will fix their attention on the things themselves ; for the great limits and outlines of external creation are replete with interest, and none of them disconnected with the natural history of Man, the general design of these lectures. For according to the most obvious import of the sacred Scriptures, the earth itself was created and reduced into order and form, for the sake of its last and noblest inhabitant, man ; and it is therefore reasonable to expect that every thing on its surface bears some reference to him, to his use or his convenience, to the perfection of his body or the still nobler end of exalt- NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 47 ing and perfecting his mind. A mere superficial glance, therefore, of nature is hardly worthy of us, but we should read it, as we read our Bibles, over and over again; and even when unsuccessful, still return with fresh hope to the perusal. It is said to have been Pythagoras, about five hun dred years before the Christian era, who first bestowed upon the visible universe, that expressive name, in the Greek language « »w, that is, order, — emphatically the order, and the fine genius of his countrymen, and their almost instinctive perceptions of propriety led them ever afterwards to retain this appellation, • ««7«>s, the order ; as we commonly translate the world. The Romans called the same mundus, which in their lan guage originally signified ornament or dress; in allu sion probably to the profusion and variety of natural objects of beauty, — hence the French have le monde. But the Greeks originated the true name — the order, and the Platonic school afterwards, withdrawing their attention from general nature, and fixing it on the epitome, Man, began to call him, •• f-f »»vs, the minia ture world, or order in miniature. There is much useful and instructive history in the origin of words, for before a general name can be given to any class of ideas, they must have been often and much before the mind. It is some encouragement for us therefore to think, that these same subjects, which we are now investigating, however meagre may be our success, are such as employed two thousand two hundred years ago, such minds as those of Pythagoras or of Plato. They did not disdain, although the subject might be repulsive to their cotemporaries, to inquire into the great limits and classes of nature, and what were their specific distinctions, and what the everlasting and solid 48 lecture the second. criteria by which they were recognizable ; and what the subordinations and concords of things that reigned in the universe; — and what analogies there are in mechanical, in animal, and in human operations, and in what respect these differ, and from what cause these analogies are not identities. Let us humbly pursue the same track, nor think it dry. There is a general resemblance between the human body, and the body of the brutal animals. This gene ral resemblance constitutes what is called the type, or standard, according to which they are each formed. But the resemblance is quite general, and of the body; and we shall suffer ourselves to be perplexed need lessly, if we fall in with many vague speculations on this subject; — among which is this one, — a favorite theory of those who would degrade Man from his established supremacy over nature, — that man is but a superior animal at the head of the scale, and not toto ccelo distinct from the other animal creation. By such foolish theories has the whole face of nature been darkened, speculations not deduced from the cor rect reading of the book of nature, (the second Word, the second in point of value, but the first in point of time) — not deduced, I say, from the correct reading of the letter of nature, or in other words, not founded on induction and observation, but in imagined analo gies drawn from the fancies of the system-makers. And thus, as there have been philosophers, who have regarded Man, as but one of the nobler animals, so there have also been philosophers, who have consi dered animals themselves, as a species of animated machines, — Descartes, it is said, entertained something of this notion, — not conceiving that animals were endowed with true sensibility, but that those appear- NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 49 ances of sensation, which we recognize in them are the mere exhibitions of certain mechanical principles under new circumstances. Again, the different organs of the animal body, such as the liver, the spleen, the glands of different kinds, salivary, lacrymal, and so- forth, are nothing more than natural chemical labo ratories, in the view of their science and philosophy, and the heart, according to the same theory, is a natural forcing-pump, a kind of steam-engine or water-works, to supply this human city withal, with the necessary quantum of blood or fluid ; and the arteries and veins are the conduit-pipes, a part of this hydraulic appara tus, for accomplishing the grand circulation: — and again, the lungs are a sort of natural bellows, born, not made, (let us do them justice,) the heaving of the ribs a part of their play, so that a due quantity of air may al ways be supplied to the various parts of the machinery, especially as among its other uses, it seems also to dis charge the functions of a grand furnace, in keeping up a proper degree of warmth in the vital blood. And they proceed next to the external of the body, and show you an evident series of mechanical contrivances in the movements of the various joints and limbs, the mus cles — the pullies, and the bones — the levers, — and pro ceed forthwith to calculate with great mathematical precision, the amount of force exerted on each muscle, and to demonstrate to you the relation between the size of the muscle in every instance, and the office to be performed by it. Now what does all this demon stration mean ? — does it go to prove that an animal is a machine ? No sound thinker views it in that light ; but perhaps the very illustrations employed obscure our true idea of an animal, and divert the mind from the thing itself to the circumstances that characterize it. 7 50 LECTURE THE SECOND. After all this investigation of the animal frame, and exhibition of its several parts, and indication of their uses, and description of their organs, — designating some as mechanical and some as chemical in their character, and all as acting according to certain known laws, with which some of our own works also agree, — we have still to come to our original impression, to our first idea, and to say, this is an animal, a living creature ; — and such and such, on examination, are found to be the scientific indications of its existence and character among created things. These serve to describe it and to identify it to those, who have previously known it, or would wish to see it ; but all these chemical and mechanical insignia are not the animal, any more than the letters which compose the name George Wash ington are the man, although they may serve to call up the idea of him to those who have known or heard of him, — to point him out among the living or the illustrious dead. Accordingly then as we may say, that an individual might still have a distinct and true idea of George Washington, although he could not spell his name, so the peasant, although he has never analysed an animal or taken the bones of its skeleton in pieces or traced the internal organs, still knows just as well what an animal is, as the most profound philo sopher; — and that philosopher never could convince him, that an animal was a machine, or a mere com plication of machineries, endowed with spontaneous voluntary motion;— he would tell him, if he could find words to express his natural and unsophisticated perception, that these were indeed the products of the scientific analysis of that object, called an animal, but that the animal itself, in its divine unity or idea, was a very different thing from those mere characteristics, NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 51 which science would read on it, and note down in her book. An unlettered rustic would be better pleased with some of the philosophy of Plato on this subject, his doctrine namely of ideas, that the living things of nature are the original types of thoughts of the Deity, and therefore undefinable, than to be told, that they are merely those things, wrhich modern science is dis posed to consider them, — an assemblage of certain material, mechanical, chemical or otherwise sensible, actings, — these are the signa of the things, but not the things. What then is the proper manner of viewing this whole subject ? — for let us not be misled either by the fanciful philosophy of Plato or the sensual speculations of modern times ; but let us endeavor to embrace both the wisdom of the ancients and the science of our own days. Under what light then shall we consider the subject of animal life, or of animals generally? — evi dently this, they present a series of laws of order, which are entirely peculiar to themselves, and to this department of nature, and which never could have been conjectured by any philosopher, and to be under stood and known must be seen, and when seen consti tute a fresh fount of living knowledge, as pure and unsullied and perfect in the mind of the peasant, as in the mind of the philosopher ; — the essential facts or native truths themselves are but the derivations and expansions of them; in a word, the science differs widely in either case. The peasant stops short for the most part at the first idea, he never stirs or but rarely from the primal truth, — the fount ; — he is satisfied to know that "an animal is an animal," — he says "it is an animal" — without farther comment, and this is saying a great deal, and indeed every thing, for the 52 LECTURE THE SECOND. whole is contained in that one idea, in that divine name. This is truth, the rest is science, — which the philosopher disengages, unravels, and brings to view; and what does he do which the other does not ?— he shows that this new and original order of nature, which is called animal life, is separated indeed from that below it by a discrete interval, so that neither mechanism nor chemistry can by any possibility ever become animal, — by any combination or subtilty; — it were easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than such a thing to take place. Nature has not so negligently guarded her frontiers, as that one department of her dominions shall encroach upon another. Among the ancients Terminus was a god, and they knew what they meant when they attributed deity to Terminus; — limits are so sacred a thing in nature that nothing can be more so ; they are almost— they are altogether divine ; — and curse and execration and sterility and disgrace will await even that mixture of races in the human kingdom, the sacred limits of which ought never to have been violated. I say then, that the sound philosopher will perceive at a glance that no combination whatever of mechanical or chemi cal agencies will ever deserve the name of animal action; — what then, would we infer that there is nothing either chemical or mechanical in the actions of the animal body?— no, but that no single action therein ought to be styled either mechanical or che mical,— unless in a subordinate sense, but animal, according to that maxim in which wisdom is wrapped up in a proverb, qui facit per alteram facit ipse, he who does it through another does it himself ;— every thing that is done in the animal body is done through the animal, through the voluntary animal or the in- NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 53 voluntary animal; all therefore is animal: this is the supreme, this is the controlling idea, — the animal alone is through all its actions; the laws of chemistry, the laws of mechanism are held in perfect and absolute subserviency, they are the servants of the animal, they are put under its feet, — they hold no supremacy over the animal, but the animal holds supremacy over them. It is a law of mechanical nature, that a body at rest remains at rest, until acted upon by a force directed upon it : — the body of an animal is at rest, — the ox, suppose, (the body of the ox) reposes in the meadow; — according to the laws of mechanics, he would retain that position, continue to repose, — but the animal disdains the law, controls or renders it obse quious, — he rises up, he moves, — what a mystery seems that self-motion ! Philosophers inquire into the laws of the motion of the planets, — can they tell the laws according to which that mass of organized matter moves along that meadow ? — the peasant can give the same answer as the philosopher, and the philosopher can give no better than this, the animal moves, because he is an animal: — is the motion mechani cal ? — no, it is animal ; — is it in violation of mechanical laws ? — no, for the higher departments of nature never break down the lower departments thereof; it is not in violation of mechanical laws, therefore, but according to them, but the motion is animal nevertheless, for it is the animal that walks. At this point, let us review and sum up; — the amount then is this, that there are certain chemical and mechanical laws in nature, or in other words, there are laws of order impressed by the fiat of omni potence, on those lowest departments of nature, which we call the mineral, or organized, and vegetable; — 54 LECTURE THE SECOND. these laws are supreme, as respects their own subjects, but they are circumscribed by very unequivocal and palpable boundaries. " Hitherto shalt thou go and no farther," is the precept enjoined on each of them : — what then ? superinduced upon these is another order of laws, and a distinct department of nature, called the animal kingdom: — we talk of links of a grand chain, but there are no links, (be it remembered,) drawn so close, or so cemented together, that these three things, a mineral, a vegetable, an animal, are ever confounded together; — it is true, certain objects may be of such characters, that our science, and skill, and judgment, may be nonplused, and we may not be able to say, whether this object be a mineral or a vegetable, or that other a vegetable or an animal ; but all this is the dulness and obtuseness of our senses or perceptions, not the confusion of nature: — although we cannot see between the links, are we to conclude that they are cemented, or even if cemented, may they not be two distinct links still, seeming to touch and yet not touch ing ? In a word, there are laws of dead nature and of living nature, of organized nature and of animal nature ; — and here then is the grand principle, fact, or law, wrhich I beg of this audience especially to remark, that when inert organized matter, whether animal or vegetable, exists alone or by itself, its own laws are supreme over itself, and uncontrolled ; but when the animal kingdom is built on the vegetable and mineral kingdom, or built from it, that the laws of the animal kingdom, which are sui generis, are supreme and uncontrolled, but such however, as do not destroy the other, the chemical or mechanical laws, but so use them at all times and in all parts, as to render them entirely subservient, (without at all violating them,) to NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 55 the great ends, and objects, and uses, of this nobler order of things, this animal nature, or animal king dom. This is a beautiful instance of nature's subordi nation being maintained, without the infringement of nature's peace : — the animal laws are supreme, and yet the chemical or mechanical laws are not violated, nay, through the influence of animal domination, they are made to execute some of their nicest and most suc cessful evolutions, so that no where are mechanical characteristics more interesting and grand, than in this department of nature ; and a geometry and a species of dynamics are exhibited in the actions of the muscles, which the more they are examined, the more astonish ing they appear ; and it is probable that chemistry never acts so illustrious a part or so signalizes her powers, as when she acts under the dominion and con trolling influence of animal life. Thus nature is ever most beautiful in her acts of subserviency and obe dience. The chemistry of the inert portions of the globe are inconspicuous and vile in comparison with that which is done at the bidding of nature in the animal frame ; and even those mechanical laws which are read in the movements of the heavenly bodies, although sublimely simple, and on that account only the more admirable, yet in intricacy and number of adjustments, all bearing successfully on one point, fall much short of those displayed in the disposition and movements of the muscles of the human hand alone, to say nothing of other parts of the body. The subject has excited the attention and admiration of all, from the most rude to the most scientific under standing. For although the anatomist can best unfold these wonders of natural art, yet they are not altoge ther hidden even from the most superficial observer. 56 LECTURE THE SECOND. Nay, even the infant, in the very dawn of its intellect and delighted wonder, is observed to be especially attracted by the tender and delicate movements of its own tiny hands and fingers. And Cicero cannot restrain the expression of his admiration: quam vero aptas, quamque multarum artium ministras manus natura homini dedit. Digitorum enim contractio faci- lis, facilisque porrectio propter molles commissuras et artus, nullo in motu laborat. Itaque ad pingendum, ad fingendum, ad scalpendum, ad nervorum eliciendos sonos ac tibiarum, apta manus est, admotione digito rum. How perfect must that mechanism be, which even in the gracefulness of its outward exhibitions, without a profound knowledge of its principles, allures the gaze of the infant, and fixes the astonishment of the most eloquent of men. But in truth, it is not the mechanism, but the vitality which is rendered conspi cuous therein, which thus enchants, and delights, and detains the mind in the contemplation of it. I have shown then a subordination of the laws of inert matter to the laws of animal life : — you will now be prepared to see the grand fallacy that is palmed off upon superficial thinkers, by a certain class of philosophers. I mentioned, when I began my lecture, that some philosophers delight in placing Man at the head of the animal kingdom, assigning him an honor able niche, apparently, but at the same time, actually degrading him, by obscuring through this classification, the true idea of his dignity, and of his unapproached and unapproachable unity. Man has no more busi ness essentially, to be classed with animals, than ani mals have to be classed with machines or vegetables. It is true, man exhibits in his bodily motions, and the analogies of his structure, all the semblances and even NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 57 most of the realities of animal life ; but so do animals themselves show on their muscles and all their joints, the mechanical traits, nay, in outward name, the very mechanical powers, while the products of other organs are of chemical phenomena ; — but what then ? do you divest the animal of its animal dignity, and relative grandeur on these accounts? — nay, rather the true nobleness of animal life, above other organized matter, seems to be enhanced the more, for that it can call such powerful ministers as chemistry and mechanism to its service, and yet still preserve itself, still be itself, nobly and distinctively animal. And in parity of rea soning, if that order of nature next to God and his image, which we call Human Nature, in virtue of its own laivs, which take the name of moral truths, — if Man, I say, in conscious virtue and freedom, bold and earnest, and faithful, through and in consequence of those laws, which are peculiar to him alone, of all creation besides, can not only subdue, and govern the chemical and mechanical laws in his own body, but even the higher laws of animal life itself, so as to ren der them obedient to moral and human laws, obedient but yet not extinguished, is he on that account to be reckoned no better of, than as the supreme animal ; — when yet it is not animal laws in him which render him supreme, but human laws, which are denominated moral truths, or with more propriety, revealed truths, for such indeed they are, and from the Deity himself. Wherefore I note the following orders in nature, all unequivocal, all connected, but not blended, — if a chain, the links at least free, and each of its own cast and substance. First, the Mineral ; second, the Vegetable ; third, the Animal ; fourth, the Human. You may object to the terms, and indeed they are 8 58 LECTURE THE SECOND. not such as I desiderate, but our language offers no popular terms more explicit ; and they will be suffi cient, if they lead the mind to discover, and to see distinctly the broad and deep lines, which the hand of the Creator has here drawn, ineffaceable, and clear, unless when a mist of words and abstract speculations obscure the sacred boundaries. But while there is here the most perfect distinction, there is, on the part of each higher order, also, an obvious assumption of the apparent attributes of the lower ; and it takes place in a very remarkable manner. Thus, if the Vegetable assume or take on the Mineral, in any semblance of structure, it is only that it may distinguish itself, as it were, the more in rendering that which is seemingly foreign to itself, entirely its own. And so in respect to the Animal, in its relations to the two lower orders ; if ever invested with the attri butes or accidents of these, it is only that the Animal may be the more conspicuous, in having made these, which are chemical, mechanical, or merely organical, also Animal. And, lastly, when the Human assumes to itself the Animal, and in that the two inferior orders, and so bears and represents in itself the three kingdoms of nature, it is only the more to signalize its own supremacy in rendering the Animal human, with all its circumstances and accidents, so that, at last, in Man — the image at once of earth and heaven, of God and nature — there is not a single thing, which is not altogether and unequivocally human: man, man, man is written on the whole and every part, soul, mind, and body ; — and yet the external lettering is of animal configuration, — but that too is human. NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 59 What a field of beauty and magnificence this consi deration opens to our view — almost untrodden ; but I dare not enter it with sandalled feet, it is "holy ground." But in these facts, and types of creation, an elevated mind will see an image of the cardinal mys tery of the Christian religion, " God manifested in the flesh," — a truth above the sphere of the senses, within the region of faith : but why it should be considered irrational or inapprehensible, I cannot perceive, when the very shadow of it. is visible on the constitution of nature itself. I have now then, definitely brought out the rational and sound view of this whole matter, touching the re lation of man to the animal creation, and shall not pursue the subject farther in this direction, as it would bear me remote from the design of these lectures, on grounds purely theological. Observe then, we do not deny that animals exhibit in their structures, mechanical and chemical applian ces; nay. you may say that all that meets the eye is of that aspect: and neither do we deny, that man also ex hibits the animal in his body; but as chemistry and mechanics are but the ministers of the animal, so the animal itself in man is but the minister of man ; — and in the case of animals, to speak truly, notwithstanding chemistry and mechanics, all is really animal ; and in the case of man, notwithstanding the animal, all is really human. But let us advert to a few particulars ; and in the body of man we have sufficiently marked the suprema cy of the human over the animal. And these indica tions are on every part of the body : — the head and its elevation, the erect posture, that majesty of counte nance, those eyes that disdain the ground, and in the 60 LECTURE the second. natural plane of vision, cut midway between earth and heaven, as if in his natural unbiased freedom, he stood between passion and reason, as moral choice impelled to raise his head erect to heaven, or incline it down wards to the earth. But I omit all these characteris tics, as perfectly obvious, and fix your attention on three points, the hand, the powers of the lungs, and the position of the mouth. Mark first, the position of the mouth: it is retracted as much as possible from ani mal purposes ; it is drawn inwards almost underneath the beetling brows, on which brows and forehead are indented the majesty of thought, or the serenity of goodness; beneath sweetly cowers the mouth, with drawn almost from animal purposes — or it should be, — and dedicated to expression, — of love, and tender ness, and wisdom. Observe in the animals, the mouth travels away from under the protection and shield of the forehead — and most immodestly and greedily — to seek for food ; — it is not in them the organ of expres sion, — it is not dedicated to the lungs especially, as in man, and that musical instrument the larynx, but it seems to be devoted almost exclusively to the stomach, and to the esophagus or gullet; — the mouth in animals and even the tongue are the slaves of their animalism; that is the supreme and reigning intention seen in their prominences and formation. On the contrary, in man the mouth and tongue are noble subjects of the lungs, and these of the brain, on which sits the mind invested with a garment of light : the tongue and the mouth consequently are appropriated to expression,— to minister food to reason and the affections, in song and sweet discourse, — " For eloquence the soul, song charms the sense," and this not for herself, but for others; here is the natural history of man. 61 attribute of benevolence enthroned on the mouth and tongue, as the instruments of speech and mutual intercourse; — no wonder the Scotch bard should cel ebrate in his mistress " Her wee bit mou' sae sweet and bonnie." Such is the human dignity of the mouth, the lips, and tongue; you see it is a mere lateral and subordinate intention of these organs in man, and not the principal, that they are also used as in animals, for the purposes of mastication, deglutition, and the conveyance of nourishment ; — and our reason tells us that these acts, although necessary, are only not forbidden; but that the passage that leads to the lungs, the larynx, and trachea, is the glorious highway in man of speech and reason — whose tremulous chords vibrate music; — in short the lungs with all their channels of varied utte rance, their wind and stringed instruments — for the larynx and trachea are both — that sounding- board, the cranium — that articulating hammer, the tongue, and all that complicated play and accordance of the mouth and lips, conspire to render that outward tablet, on which his life is impressed, and made vocal and distinct, not unworthy to be the substitute of that perfect brain, on which it was all first inscribed on the golden morn of his earlier creation, ere yet the atmos phere had greeted those lungs with its first rude welcome. With the lungs and their varied movements, is con nected the subject of language or expression, which in its varied forms and essays in different nations, and through a series of ages, will form no uninteresting subject, I hope, of some future lecture. It is by his voice and his hand, that man stands pre-eminently 62 lecture the second. distinguished, and in both you see the types of his reason, his proper humanity. Man has a hand — animals but anterior extremeties, which, however, correspond with the hand, and much more than perhaps most persons are aware of. I show you here the foreleg and foot of the horse ; — you can apply the observations to the analogous parts of other animals. As I count the parts and compare them with those of the human arm and hand, you will remark the striking correspondence. You see herein an impressive illustration of the posi tion in our last lecture : that the essential type of order is never abandoned, under analogous conditions of existence, but only as the ends require, variously mod ified. Assume in this instance (the assumption is warrantable,) the human hand to be the essential type, the absolute and perfect model — towards which all the other designs have tended as to the consummation of the grand wish of nature, and you will see a series of modifications of the most beautiful and interesting description. And the following points I think will be conspicuous : 1. That the parts correspondent with the human hand in each creature are defined by, and reflective of, its instincts ; and as these imply a certain fixed determi nation of the life of the animal towards certain ends or objects, so those instruments are exclusively adapted to the accomplishment of those ends and objects, and none other. 2. That the human hand — also reflective of the human soul, and as it were, the material attribute of the reason— is wholly unconfined, free and undeter mined in its aptitudes and functions, unless it be to follow and obey the constantly new and original sug- NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 63 gestions of an enlightened and progressive mind. If we adopt the comparison of a tool, it is the universal tool, or tool of tools, while the analogous parts of ani mals are fitted for the achievement of but one or two uses only. 3. Each is equally perfect in its kind, but the perfec tion of the one is universal and catholic, that of the other exclusive and specific. I refer you to nature for facts in illustration, which are abundant and at hand. What need to specify them. In these three, then, the lungs, the mouth, and the hands, you see striking parts of Man's natural history; you see the light of his inward being, as it were, illuminating his outward form, and pointing out his members, both vocal and formative, as intended to embody those uses, which administer to the strength of his reason, and the diffusion of benevolence, rather than such as are gross, tending to the senses only. Let the noble works performed by his hand, and the beautiful languages, once moulded by his tongue, and cast in enduring record — all of which are intended to be subjects of our historical sketches hereafter — testify to the divine perfection of those physical instru ments in his body, which the Hand of infinite Wisdom and Benevolence has so gloriously fashioned and adorned. LECTURE THE THIRD; LANGUAGE,— ITS ORIGIN AND USE. The material universe is to us the fountain of all knowledge of the physical reasons of the laws employed in its economy. — That of these as yet, but lit tle is known. — Illustrated in the intricacy of the structure of the human body, which before it can be understood, a totally new and original science must be extricated from nature The same is true of the divine moral system. — The disclosure of physical and moral truth proportioned to the practice of our pre sent knowledge Individual effort never lost ; — language, the chief medium of its perpetuation. — The physical instruments of language — the lungs, — their uses, — the primary end of nature in their construction, — traced from their ru- dimental form in fishes. — The question, is speech natural or acquired ? consid ered. — God is the author of human speech. — There is but one language, but a diversity of dialects Illustration. — Speculations concerning an original language entirely vain. — The unity of language is from the fraternity of the human race, — its variety the consequence and symbol of human freedom, — the tendency to variety checked by the faculty of imitation. — True value of the scriptural idea of the unity of speech. — Modifications, how produced. — Ar ticulation an intellectual process The perfection of antediluvian speech was in the unanimity of the moral feelings, — the discordance of modern lan guages arises from the obscuration of the moral sense. — Mysterious connection of language and thought Language the chief instrument in the formation of the moral and intellectual sense Its dignity and uses. Geometry and arithmetic are attributes of nature, revealed in every part of the material universe, in mechanical or chemical phenomena; and are to us the signs or indications of the grand natural laws or principles according to which the whole has been con structed. But the sciences of these are only the 9 66 LECTURE THE THIRD. shadows of those divine exemplars, which the order of nature exhibits. Our science is indeed but a certain small territory, taken in, and fenced off from a vast and unlimited region reserved for future discovery. But just so far only as we have cultivated science, are we capable of pointing out in nature, the physical reason of the arrangement and adaptation of organs, or instruments, for the accomplishment of natural ends. Our knowledge of the mechanical powers, for instance, of the composition and resolution of forces, and their results, — renders us capable of seeing the reason of the origin and insertion, the contour and arrangement, of many of the muscles of the human body, and of the more general proportions observed in the magnitude, strength, and forms of the bones. Popular books are full of these instances of design, as they are correctly termed; — but it is not so often noticed, that there must be an infinite number of mechanical adjustments, of which our acquired science, the shadow of the divine or archetypal science, does not suggest to us even the most distant hint. Nay, it is probable that there are even certain kinds of science, as distinct from any we yet know, (as for example, geometry is from chem istry,) — of which, of course, we cannot speak, because we cannot even form an idea ; although we may recog nize the possibility at least, of the existence of such- recondite, and latent, and visible as yet only to the divine eye. Such sciences, as respects mankind, have yet to be. But of those which exist, the sciences of number and measurement, the cultivation is still ex tremely limited, and therefore much more of the divine arithmetic, and divine geometry may be yet expected to fall within the apprehension of the human mind; and then no doubt, the natural reason of many more of NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 67 those adjustments in the animal body will be brought to light, as well as of many facts, still obscure, in other departments of nature. For example, who can doubt that there is a natural reason, (I mean a geometrical and arithmetical one,) for the number as well as the established proportions of the fingers of the human hand: there is a recondite calculus here, which will require the ingenuity and powers of some future Leibnitz or Newton to unfold; and when it is un folded, will not the science of the Divine Mind as it were, become more conspicuous, and fresh grounds be adduced for our confidence in the wisdom as well as goodness of the Creator? And what discoveries yet to be made in astronomy! — is there not also an arith metical reason (resulting, of course, from a creative provision) for that precise number of revolutions on its axis, which the earth makes in its annual path? But it seems to me that there is some science totally new and purely original to be extricated from nature, that labyrinth of infinite art, ere we can obtain a glimpse of the natural reason for the structure and arrangement of the parts of the brain and the entire nervous system. On this field as yet total darkness rests; and here, although we may adore a wisdom, it is a wisdom which is unknown, in its natural laws, in this instance. But gleams of light will yet be cast upon it; the humble and assiduous inquirer will discover some relation between this unknown and the known. The Divine Providence suffered not the Athenians to wor ship always, at the altar of "an unknown god." When there is a right desire, and untiring industry, there will at length be the reward of light. But I have alluded as yet only to the physical or scientific system of the universe, and hinted how im- 68 LECTURE THE THIRD. mense the field of discovery, how few the points yet ascertained, and how scattered the cheerful rays which exhibit to us the general outlines of its magnificence. But there is another system of which the physical or scientific is but the basis, I mean the divine moral system. And here also we have attained as yet but to a few hints, but these indeed of the most valuable and cheer ing kind. Our ideas and modes, or rules of justice, are also but the faint images or impressions of that which is revealed to us in the book of God's providence :— but his justice infinitely exceeds ours, and hence there are many of its steps and proceedings, much of its order and arrangement, which entirely frustrates our utmost stretch of moral science, to unravel or satisfacto rily to explain. There are here moral enigmata, just as difficult to solve, to our limited moral science, as the mechanical or scientific problems in the structure of the living frame, are hard or even impossible to account for with our present scientific attainments. From what recondite principles of essential and absolute justice it results, that so many animals should live on the destruction of others, is just as hard to explain, as it would be to calculate and determine, why all the muscles that act on the five fingers, should have those precise relations and adjustments, which they do have, and no other. It is indeed easy to discover in this in stance a few principles, whose tendencies are under stood, but so numerous, and varied, are the data which enter into the solution of the problem, that while we feel and acknowledge the perfection of the grand result, we are totally unable to trace the natural steps by which it has been accomplished. We can only discover that the work, even perfect as it is, (and NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 69 its perfection is rather enhanced than obscured by this consideration,) is effected on essential principles of science, although as yet very imperfectly known to us. And it is certainly a most interesting consideration, that the principles of moral justice, and of physical science, should in this respect, agree ; that while both are alike fixed, and indispensable, the one in the moral, the other in the physical wTorld, yet at the same time the operations and results of each in the grand theatre of the universe, should be equally difficult of explana tion, involved in similar obscurity and perplexity. But in the scrutiny of the moral department of the universe are we condemned for ever to be at fault, al ways to fall short of that truth, which we so ardently desire ; is progress here impossible, or have wre already reached the goal of discovery ? No more, 1 apprehend, than we can be supposed to have reached the limit of natural or physical discovery. The mines of nature have not been exhausted, whether of natural or moral knowledge, nor have the human faculties become en feebled, unless by a voluntary despair. Only moral knowledge has to be sought from the word of God, scientific knowledge from the works of God. But as natural knowledge of the works of God seem to be extended and strengthened, mainly by the ap plication of such knowledge to the arts and inventions of life, — what Bacon calls " fruits," and true theory is seen to advance, just in proportion that previous dis coveries have been usefully applied, — as our knowledge of the natural structure of the eye is enlivened and enlarged by the application of its principles to the con struction of telescopes, so just in the degree in which we reduce the known principles of justice, and virtue, and honor, to practice, in the perfection of social and 70 LECTURE THE THIRD. civil institutions, in that same degree, will new and original views, and as just and satisfactory as they are original, be disclosed to us, of the principles of the moral government of the universe, and its magnificent and sublime details, from that written Word, in which they lie treasured up, for the admiration, and delight, and use, of future generations of mankind, far better and wiser, we can readily suppose, than any that have yet appeared. Seeing then so wide a field spread out before us, spiritual, (so to speak,) as well as natural, let us be en couraged to proceed. Only let us recollect that we must look in each field, but for those products which it is designed to afford. Let us not seek science or natural history in the book of spiritual and moral reve lation, or vainly expect to find in nature a light which is not originally in her, but derived and reflected. Na ture reflects the light of revelation, but only as the moon that of the sun. But in her the mild light of science inheres and is grateful to our natural sight. Let us then advance with this distinction clearly in our view. The human race is so connected into one, that the effort of each individual, however weak, provided it be well intentioned, is never lost, but propagated to the mass, so that what one may merely ardently wish, another may resolutely endeavor, and a third, or a fourth, or a twentieth, may at length accomplish. The undulations of mind and feeling throughout the entire globe and sphere of humanity, visible and invisi ble, past, present, and to come, are truly marvellous ; — the propagations of light and sound, wonderful as they are, fall much short of these. But language is the chief medium of this communi cation, at least the most palpable to us, — perhaps but NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 71 the symbol of an invisible intercourse ; — at all events, a most interesting subject, and I therefore devote this lecture mainly to its consideration, as it may be a con venient bridge, along which to pass to other perhaps still more alluring aspects of our general theme. But how shall we treat the subject? I know no better method, than that which we have hitherto proposed to ourselves, to proceed, namely, from body to mind, from matter to spirit ; it is an unambitious path ; but let us creep, before we walk, — and walk, before we fly. The organs of the animal body are so formed, as to discharge each, several uses; and it is sometimes diffi cult to say, which is the principal. I instanced in my last lecture the mouth, and showed that it was subser vient to two obvious purposes, — the one, for the admis sion of nourishment to the animal, — the other, as the organ of the lungs. The lungs themselves subserve two grand uses in the animal economy, — one as a general rendezvous of the whole blood of the body, in successive tides, to meet the external atmosphere, and therefrom to take whatever is congenial with itself, and at the same time, to part with what is unpropi- tious ; another use is, that they may be an instrument, under the control of the will of the animal, to serve to designate its desires. Looking at the lungs in this light, we might say, that it was the main design of them to enable the animal to emit sound; for although the purification of the blood in the lungs is an indis pensable use, yet it is more animal than the other, and belongs rather to the organical, than to the expressive or mental life. That the lungs are not absolutely necessary to the life of an animal, is clear from the case of those living creatures, which are not endowed with the organ, as the annelides, and indeed all of the 72 LECTURE THE THIRD. insect tribe; it is true, that one of the functions, which the lungs discharge in the higher order of ani mals, — the aeration ofthe blood — is indispensable; but this we find to be carried on very perfectly, for the life of those creatures, by means of the stigmata or air tubes, with which their bodies are covered, and in which the blood or circulated fluid meets the atmosphere, and re ceives the necessary purification or restoration. And that even the blood of the higher animals, and of Man, undergoes a certain restoration in the external contact of the atmosphere through the pores of the skin, which thus co-operate with one of the functions of the lungs, seems extremely probable, and is advocated at least by one individual of no mean reputation; — and we find ourselves, from daily experience, that when the cutaneous excretions are interrupted by temporary ob structions of the pores of the skin, through cold or otherwise, that a more than double duty is devolved upon the lungs, which labor under the task imposed upon them, and find it hard to throw off the recremen- titious matters of the blood, which have been accumu lated; and hence the violent effort of the lungs by coughing and other means to disburden themselves of those impurities, which it belonged to the pores of the skin in their regular action to have eliminated. It may then be taken for granted that the purification of fhe blood in the lungs, although no doubt eminently performed there, is not the most signal use of that organ, or one which cannot be performed at all by any other; for the stigmata of insects effect the same use in their diminutive bodies; and even in the human body the same use is at least partially accomplished through the pores of the skin. Accordingly, we may perceive that nature in constructing this additional NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 73 organ — laying the rudiments of it at first, in fishes, — in their gills or bronchia, — had another grand design in view besides the aeration of the blood; — she de signed to provide and attach thereto an apparatus of sound, and ultimately to secure the grand end of lan guage or speech in the human kingdom. For, although those animals in which the lungs are fully developed, and the two circulations entirely accomplished, enjoy much greater activity of life, and wear the marks or symbols of a more perfect intelligence, and constitute what are called the warm blooded animals, at the same time however the peculiar construction of that tube which connects the bronchia or air cells of the lungs with the external atmosphere, indicates very clearly that a secondary design is attached to their formation, which in man at last, appears the primary end, the true intention, — to provide the means of vocal utterance. This is seen most remarkably in that part of the tube called the larynx, next the tongue, and which is very artificially formed, and clearly for the purpose of the conformations of sound. It is here then that the foun dation is laid by the hand of nature itself, for the construction of the cries of animals and the speech of man. What a dreary solitude would nature be, but for those enlivening sounds ; and what clear proofs of benevolence we see even in these physical and me chanical provisions for the accomplishment of such an object. It is not enough for the gratification of a philosophical mind, simply to hear, and listen, to the sweet songs of birds and their varied notes, from the monotonous chirp, to the full and flowing soul of har mony poured from their little throats. It is not enough for the philosopher merely to enjoy the sensual gratification of this cheerful and simple scene. It is 10 74 LECTURE THE THIRD. not sufficient for him, that his ear be merely excited by their notes, and the pleasanter associations of his in fancy called up by the sounds; but his mind travels far ther than this, and he does not merely surrender him self to the reverie of pleasant sensations, nor yet with a blind religious awe, is he contented merely to say that God has provided all this fund of innocent recreation, and enjoyment, in the simple scenes of nature; he carries his investigations and inquiries still farther than this; and he endeavors to establish the truth in his mind, and in his reason, by some substantial and pal pable proof, that it is actually a designing intelligence, through which all these effects are produced ; — and he traces in this very mechanical and artificial apparatus of vocal expression, not the vague belief, but the actual fact, that the Author of nature has conferred not only on man, the gift of proper speech, but also bestowed on the higher animals, and particularly on the winged tribes, a power and faculty of analogous expression, which although not speech, is the type of speech, as animal is the type of human ; — a rude sketch in a lower order, of a finished work in a higher. We have here some clue to the understanding of the common belief, that speech is the gift of God: certainly, in this sense, at least, that man did not construct, by any effort or art of his own, that com plicated and wonderfully adjusted apparatus of vocal expression, which is constituted in the anterior and superior portion of the body;— for in truth, the whole thorax and the mechanism of the ribs, as well as the cellular tissue of the bronchia, and the ringed tube of the trachea, and the whole system of the oral appara tus, are parts auxiliary, or principal, to the act of speaking; and we need not to be informed, that we did not construct any of these, or after they were con- NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 75 structed, put them up in that order, and nice adapta tion to the end, which we discover in them. Is speech, then, natural to man, or is it acquired ? Let us proceed to examine the evidence before us : — let us advance to the analysis of those portions of nature, which are submitted to our view, and perhaps we shall acquire a satisfactory answer. If by speech be meant the mere act of emitting sounds, we may not yet be prepared to say, whether it be natural or acquired ; — or we may not have a very distinct idea of what we mean by the terms ; but this much we are now sure of at least, that the physical instrument or instruments, by which we speak, have been provided for us by nature ; — and we can trace the first dawning of her design, from a long distance, even among the more imperfect animals, when she first began to form the rudiments of lungs, — in the very gills of fishes, and the bronchia of the tadpole. Although these are mute, we can yet see her first essays towards the consum mation of this all perfect instrument of the human voice. Now an act which nature has traveled so far, and so long thus to accomplish, up through the imperfect animals, to at last the mammalia and the birds, — in them conspicuous, — we cannot view as a trifling act, or one of slight import : an instrument of sound, perfect as his mind, and obedient thereto, has been put in the power of man ; he is made the owner ; it constitutes a part of his body ; when he tries it, it sounds but rudely, but the imperfection is evi dently not in the instrument, but in the vocalist him self, who has not learned as yet to use it rightly. But have we yet answered the question, is God the author of human speech ? We are now prepared to see how far we are ready for the solution of it. Suppose, then, a father to have 76 LECTURE THE THIRD. put into the hands of his twelve sons, musical instru ments of precisely similar make, and that they had also inherited from him, all of them, musical propensi ties and dispositions, so as to catch, and to imitate each sweet cadence of melody that fell upon their ears, from the groves and woods, the musical academies of the singing birds, — which thronged these wild do mains, their paternal inheritances; — if these twelve sons were musicians, and played on these instruments skilfully, would you say it was the act of their father or their own? or, can you say, how at last it was accomplished ? But perhaps they all played different tunes, and not one, and that — original, and the arche type of the others; — such most likely would be the result; but yet music, in all its variety, is essentially one, and human speech, although infinitely diversified, flows from one — not one system of sounds, so much as one system of articulated thought. We seem, then, now to be approaching the solution of the question, and the answer would appear to be this, that God is really the author of human speech : — First, because he has, with an infinity of mechanical skill, constructed the physical instrument ; secondly, because he has implanted in the human soul, a disposi tion to speech, and the faculty of imitating articulated sound. And again, human speech is one, because men are brethren, — in their mental conceptions, and their bodily faculties alike, and therefore their ideas are moulded similarly. Men have but one language, but a diversity of dialects ; — the diversity of dialects comes from local circumstances, but the oneness of language comes from the divine brotherhood of the human race, or the identity of the human kingdom, notwith standing all its families and different homesteads. " The father loves his son," — " the son reverences his NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 77 father," — these ideas may be articulated in many thousand different impulses of the organs of speech, on the atmosphere of a thousand countries, and provinces ; but the essential speech is the same in all. " The father loves his son ;" when that moral fact is articulated in speech, it is articulated in three joints, and the mind of every human being, with whatever modifications of breath he presses it on the atmosphere, feels, and views it still substantially in one way ; — the father is one, the son another, and the relation expressed between them a third ; it is this similarity of mental conception, this identity of nature, this fraternity of man, that lays the divine foundations of language, and renders the intercourse of mind with mind possible. You call that form of language Greek, and this other English; but in what does that Greek differ from this English? It is merely the color or texture of a veil, — you draw aside the English or the Greek, — and you see the same divine human countenance, sweetly arrayed in the smiles of love, or clothed with the majesty of reason and philosophy. Why is it then that we say that the language of Homer is so much superior to that of our day ? It is just because it is a veil so perfect, and so gracefully worn withal, that you see the transparent symmetry of the noble Grecian mind, displayed without an effort; as if the very dress had been put on by the same Hand which originally clothed the human soul itself, with its own appropriate form, — that body, those limbs, and lineaments, and features. Under this view of the subject, then, it is easy to see what we are to understand by the proposition, that language is the gift of God, and that there was origin ally but one language; and how ridiculous, and almost childish, are those speculations and inquiries as to that 78 LECTURE THE THIRD. original language, whether Hebrew, or what ! As far back as history carries us, men have been speaking a variety of languages, in the common acceptation of the word; — and what may have been the state of the human race, at a period anterior to history, no one who understands the limits of rational investigation will consider himself competent to decide, although he may allow7 himself the freedom of conjecture. This much we know, that mankind are found in almost every imaginable stage of progress, from the most savage to the most civilized condition, and in no case do we find them destitute of language ; — wherever there is human respiration there is human speech ; that ebb and flow of the atmosphere, as it alternates in the thorax of the human body, is impelled by the organs of the human voice a thousand various ways, to us mysteri ous and inscrutable, so as to convey to the ears of others the impressions of those thoughts and sentiments which agitate or interest the mind of him who utters them. These atmospheric impressions may often resemble, from the. fact, that all men naturally attempt to imitate by their breathing, the natural sounds which occur every where, and are similar ; of these there are many instances in all languages, particularly of rude tribes. But to suppose these, in all cases, to have been imitated and copied from those who had first adopted and used them, seems by no means tenable ground. And I imagine that it arises from narrow views of the charac ter and nature of man, as well as of the operations of Divine Providence. Cannot the origin of human speech be considered due to the Creator, unless we can think of it as having begun from that Source, in some one country exclusively, at first, and in some very remote epoch of time, and thence to have spread to other countries and other times, by successive and per- NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 79 petual imitation ? I must frankly own, that the idea of the divine origin of language seems to me much more striking and real, when I think of it as proceeding from the very constitution of human nature itself, and con sequently from the will and act of Him, every single instant, "in whom we live, and move, and have our being ;" and that language is truly one, however vari ous, in virtue of this its constant and present origin. What analogies, and similarities, in the stems and leaves of all the various tribes of the vegetable king dom ! Whence are these ? Have they been all copied, so to speak, from the first budding and efflorescence of some central group, in one favored spot ? Not so ; but they spring from a more present cause, a more real origin, — the very order inscribed on the vegetable crea tion, and its fixed relations with other departments of nature. Are the analogies of human languages to be differently accounted for? The smiles and frowns of the human countenance, and the natural cries, indicative of joy or distress, are the same, wherever the family of man is found. Do we suppose these to have been copied by one genera tion from another, downward from the first man, or to occur spontaneously, — divinely, to be the result of our formation, — nature itself willing and acting in us ? On such foundations speech is built, and hence springs its original unity. But its variety, at the same time, is the clearest indication, that the mind of man is not chained down to any invincible law of necessity, but left free to mould the original and spontaneous impressions of nature, into a thousand various systems of ideas, and as a proof of this, to express them vocally and sonorously, in as many various forms of speech. But in all these there is still the analogy of man, and hence, amid infinite variety, the still visible form of 80 LECTURE THE THIRD. unity, here more, there less conspicuous, according as the different groups of the human family approximate or recede, in the incidents of their natural or civilized condition. That unity, — those links of brotherhood which connect them together, — and which is not only seen in their features and gestures, but also heard in their language — that chain, I say, which binds them, is upholden by the hand of the Creator himself, and is, in one sense, a chain of necessity ! — a good necessity — which renders man still true to man ; but the various- ness interwoven with it, is at once the consequence, and the symbol of human freedom, and in no instance so remarkable as in this very copiousness, and diversity of sounds and articulations, in which thought is embodied. This tendency to indefinite variety in human lan guage, is at the same time restrained, and in some measure limited, by the faculty of imitation- implanted in man. From this it has arisen that the audible sounds of nature, which are nearly every where the same, have been moulded and incorporated in some degree into all languages; but imbued, as it were, with the peculiar life of each. At the same time, neighboring nations, from mutual intercourse, and this proneness to imitation, have largely borrowed of each other words and sounds, each however still preserving its own idiom : as the bodies of plants and animals, are built up of the materials which have entered into the composition of others, while each constantly retains its own peculiar life, and form, and genus. For often, while the sound and form of words, of neighboring languages bear a resem blance, the force and value of their elements vary exceedingly in the different systems. On their adop tion into other languages, they actually receive a new NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 81 nature ; and these additions resemble rather the nutri tive sap that is taken in by the roots of the tree, than the grafts which are inserted in its trunk and branches ; they assume the character of the tree and lose their own specific distinctions. Such, then, are the two main sources from which language receives the constant accessions, as it were, of raw material, to be appropriated as the wants of the community require. I mean, first, the radical sounds and voices of external nature, and, secondly, those already appropriated and humanized by other nations. But, independently of these sources of analogy and resemblance, there seems no reason why a similarity of vocal sounds should exist among mankind. The arguments drawn from the sacred Scriptures, to establish a system of uniform sounds, and modifications of voice to designate ideas, are of akin with the sys tems of astronomy and geology drawn from the same book; — all which, after being fanatically maintained for a time, by arguments suggested by passion, rather than philosophy, are compelled by degrees to give place to the solid truths of observation and experience. Not that I believe that a single truth of science militates in the least against the authority of the sacred Scriptures ; but these books do not purport to deliver to us a sys tem of science, but only to reveal the author of Crea tion and the established series of its epochs. We are instructed from this source, that speech is the native and original endowment of humanity, and that it was one, until abused. Man abused his powers, whence has sprung confusion in his ideas; and even that fraternity of the human race has been in a certain degree impaired in consequence. Hence that disso nance in the moral sentiments of mankind, which is the true Babel, or actual derangement of mental speech. 11 82 LECTURE THE THIRD. The unity of speech, then, which existed in the earlier ages of the world, was the unity of thought, and of design, and endeavor, which characterized a race of men, who had not yet fallen from that state of integrity in which they were at first placed. They viewed every object of creation in its natural light; they knew its name, the name which the Creator him self had stamped on every work of his hands, — and their science was intuition. But as we may easily suppose that even their faculties were more or less improved by exercise, and that hence variety existed among them, so it is not irrational to conceive, that the tones and articulations of their voice, in which they expressed the thought, and feeling of their minds, were equally diversified. That, for example, that peculiar breathing of the mouth, and modification of it by the lips, in which they expressed their idea of the sun or stars, may have been remarkably adapted to convey a correspondent impression to the mind of another;— and that thus, speech among them, was more diverse fied than it is now, as their minds were more free and open to the real impressions of things. Their one language then, would combine within it a greater variety of sound and articulation than might be found at present in all the languages of the globe; — but that, nevertheless, in consequence of the harmony of their minds, it was not unintelligible to any part of the human family; — each instinctively felt the full force, and impression of the thoughts of another, although uttered in sounds before unheard, and novel, it might be, even to the speaker himself; for vocal utterance would be spontaneous, and new with each new conception ; — but it resembled withal those sweet tones, and murmurs, with which a mother expresses her affections to her infant, and to which it also replies, NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 83 in gentle cooings of infantile delight, and budding intelligence, — vocal expressions of a species of thought, to utter which our mechanical and artificial languages, now-a-days, could furnish no facilities of either words or tones. But it is vain to travel over a field of such wide conjecture; — let it be sufficient for us to know, that speech is natural to man, and that very probable argu ments could be advanced, that if man now lived in that primeval simplicity which the sacred Scriptures inform us once belonged to him, however multiplied and diversified might be those murmurs of voice, and spontaneous expression, in which he made known his wishes or his ideas, they could not be unintelligible to others, who lived in similar innocence, but the inter course would be perfect between mind and mind, and endeared as that which now exists between a mother and her infant, in the dawn of its intellect, before it has yet learned to express its wishes, in the conven tional and artificial language of modern society. We know, at all events, (and this is not a matter of fancy,) that there are certain inarticulate cries which are natural to man, and express the various emotions of his mind. These are not dignified with the name of speech, because they are common to him with the animals. On the calm or troubled stream of these emotions, which are tones, are impressed the modifica tions which are called speech or language, and which are the shadows of ideas. In this manner, it may be perceived, that tones are the ground-work, or the sur face on which language is indented by that process which is called articulation, and which is purely intel lectual, and belongs not to the animals. They have all however their peculiar and instinctive cries, and the birds their instinctive notes, which are not learned 84 LECTURE THE THIRD. from the parent birds, but are natural to them. The domestic hen has great variety in its notes; and its call of invitation, in particular, to its brood, to partake of the food which it discovers for them, is quite peculiar, as every body knows ; — it has also a particular note to express surprise and give alarm, which cannot be mistaken; and the cluck! cluck! with which she oversees her brood, and which seems to be very expressive of consequence and authority, is for midable even to dogs, and other enemies which would encroach upon her domains on those occasions. These are instances of a kind of natural language in animals, which we presume to retain their proper place in crea tion, and not to have deviated from it ; — and from the observation of such facts, we might very easily imagine at least the possibility of a general language in the human family, flowing from reason and uncorrupted instinct, and the consequently pure and natural percep tions of the true relations of objects external to the mind. The contemplation of these might be supposed in such a state to have affected all men nearly similarly; they derived from them ideas which were always true to nature, and therefore harmonizing, although various; the similar affections of their minds gave birth to tones which were just and expressive of the things which produced them, and on these tones were impressed various modifications through the lips, and tongue, and palate, which were the language of the peculiar ideas of the understanding, which were originated at the same time in the individual. But as we imagine that these affections, as well as ideas, spring directly from the observation and view of the prototypes of nature herself, and not from acquired knowledge, we are con sequently led to the conclusion, that the tones and articulated sounds of the earliest language must have NATURAL HI9T0RY OF MAN. 85 exceeded, in variety and extent, the whole united com pass of expression at present to be found in all the languages of the earth. In that golden age, therefore, or antediluvian world, which we are taught to consider as being more innocent than this, which has succeeded, and in which consequently there existed but one speech, there must have been in that one speech lan guages so numerous, that the speech of every indivi dual was itself a language ; — nay, also, the language of the individual himself must change every month or year, as his affections were enlarged or his ideas extended. And thus, the word father, for example, would not only be expressed with an additional tone of tenderness, as he became more sensible of the extent of his obligations to that relation, but with such a new accent or indentation of the word, as would give another arrangement to its vowels and consonants, and in fact render it almost a new word, exactly expressive of all the new ideas which had been gathering around the object itself, which it was intended to describe. So that the various transformations which are effected on this word father, by our children, in their first efforts to pronounce the name, are in some sort a representa tion of those changes which we may suppose to have been constantly produced on all the words of that one perfect and correspondent language which we fancy to have existed before the flood ; but the beauty and per fection of it may be supposed to have been this, that in consequence of its expressing precisely, and accord ing to the order of nature, the very feelings of the minds, and the modifications of intelligence, which were yet uncorrupt, and in unison with the whole of humanity, these constantly new tones and distinctions of sound, fell upon their ears like familiar and well known voices, finding an easy admission to every heart, 86 LECTURE THE THIRD. and naturally intelligible to every understanding. It was the spoken music of nature, and needed no other interpreter but that "voice of God" within, which, being universally felt and acknowledged, banished all estrangement and discord from the earth, whether in mind, in voice, or in action. And yet there was no monotony there ; for — .. — Neither various style, Nor holy rapture wanted they to pTaise Their Maker ; in fit strains pronounced or sung Unmeditated ; such prompt eloquence Flowed from their lips, in prose or numerous verse More tunable than needed lute or harp To add more sweetness— From these conjectures, it can be seen at least how vague and inadequate the common idea is, of an orig inal language, and how foolish it would be to think that it could resemble either in its structure or its harmony, any of those wretched and meagre dialects which we write and speak. These to be sure, in their poverty and indistinctness, and remarkably artificial character, are a very just representation of the habits of our minds, shut out from the natural perception of objects, especially such as are of a moral and religious kind, for on these a dense cloud now rests, the same which also obscures our moral sense, or has nearly obliterated it. Still, however, our languages are an exact image of ourselves, but for that very reason unintelligible, unless from labor and study, to other nations; the features of a real fraternity have been expunged in a great measure from their words and syntax, and they exhibit a pic ture it must be confessed, but too faithfully just, of the present discordant condition of the moral sentiments of mankind. They are the languages of opinion, rather than of truth. Hence it has arisen, that morality and NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 87 religion being acquired, not innate, although their foundations are not the less firm on that account, the nations of the present races of mankind are trained and disciplined in youth, each through their mother tongues, into certain confined views and sentiments; and it is not until the age of mature reason, that we are able to obtain even a glimpse of that once perfect light, which was wont to be as common as this of the sun, and as universally diffused. But there is a pro vision for the recovery of this pristine condition of the human race ; and the indications are to be found in that expansive and germinant power, conspicuous in modern languages ; — the English language especially is yet in its infancy, as is certainly the English mind. Our language will widen as our views expand, and although rough at first, and rude, must be all innova tions, as original views also are abrupt and indistinct, yet custom will mellow the one, and ripen the other. The connection between language and thought is as difficult to understand, as the intercourse between body and soul : and perhaps the analogy also holds in other respects; — that it is just as impossible to think efficiently without language, — some system of natural or conventional symbols, as it is for the soul to act with out the body; and as the senses are the first occasions, although not the causes of ideas, so it would appear that language, although not the material of thought or ratiocination, is yet the natural instrument without which it cannot be carried on, or tangibly represented even to the mind itself. Language in its proper sense, being denied to brutes and granted only to man, signifies a peculiarity in his nature, of a very remarkable kind, which will be far ther illustrated hereafter. It is the instrument pro vided by nature for stamping on his being after birth, 88 LECTURE THE THIRD. through the means of society, the moral sense, in other words, religion, with which the instincts of animals, (the laws of their life,) bear an analogy; but in them these are fixed at birth. In man it is otherwise,— the moral sense is unsettled then, in order that it may be established afterwards in freedom and rationality ; and through the action of the moral affections of society, (communicated chiefly through language,) become at last fixed, — a certain and unerring law of life, — if not inborn, inbred, and the last perfection of human char acter. Such is the dignity and worth of language, and so high is the office it is designed to discharge in the com pletion of the moral creation of man; — for in the womb the laws of physical life alone are impressed immutably on his being, and rendered unerring, but in the bosom of society his moral life begins to be formed, and although we are witnesses to some of [the means and instruments (of which language is one) the act is not the less wonderful or divine on that account. It is true the moral sense, although so much higher a fac ulty than that of instinct, is apparently more imperfect in its operations, but the reason of that is plain, from the lessons of revelation; ultima dies expectanda est; the work is yet unfinished. The moral sense will show all the perfections of instinct on the second birth into " everlasting life." But besides the moral sense in man, imperfect at birth, or its foundation merely provided, there is also the intellectual sense, similarly produced. The instinct of animals comprehends both; they are not only perfect ly sensible of the ends of their life, but also of the means of attaining them. In both instances their nature, such as it is, is wholly made up, finished at birth, and in both also the human being is but "half made up," NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 89 and not even that, for the moral and intellectual crea tion (such properly it is) is then only begun. But the work is going on; and language is here no less evi dently the appointed instrument of building up the intellectual, than in forming the moral man. And in either case his mother tongue is that especial and nat ural means, whereby his mind and affections are moulded into the image and likeness of his family and country, just as certainly as his body and form are de termined by the physical contour and disposition of his progenitors. But neither is there here any law of cruel necessity, for although his native tongue modifies, while it gives occasion to, his first moral and intellec tual sentiments, yet the very modifications which that native tongue itself constantly undergoes from each new generation of human beings, are a positive demon stration, that the intellectual and moral sentiments of mankind, although originally derived from education, are not controlled by it, but capable of receiving con tinual additions, improvements, and renovations. They may also degenerate, be lost, or obscured. In either case, and under every view of the subject, language is a true index of the moral and intellectual, the free and expan sive nature of man. It wanes or brightens, as morals and intelligence degenerate or improve. The intellectual sense will receive its perfection at the second birth of the human being, not less than the moral. This is a truth of revelation, but susceptible of demonstration also from the light of nature. The manner in which language is acquired in child hood, and its contents opened to the understanding, if attentively observed, would throw much light on the formation of our sentiments and opinions. Languages appear at first to be learned by imitation, and the sen tences and words, which children first use, they seldom 12 90 LECTURE THE THIRD. distinctly understand. The recognition of this fact has led some to depreciate the value of language as an in strument to develope, in education, and they have re commended in place of it "the study of things." And this surely ought not to be neglected, and it is indispen sable to render the other effectual. But yet the acquisi tion of words and phrases is a much more important part of education than is generally supposed. They are the deposits in the smallest compass of the results of much observation and reasoning of our predecessors. When we open them in mature life, what a legacy of truth do we sometimes find to have been committed to us. Most persons, however, seldom open these deposits of ideas, or seek to know what they contain. — The depos its of theological language are the least explored. Language then, may be considered as the treasury of the experience and common observation of man kind ; and although very unlike its most ancient per fection, it is still the best vehicle of the ideas of those who have preceded us;— it is a chain that draws to gether all those minds that have passed from the terres trial sphere, and those who in their turn occupy it; and the feeling that once quickened the bosom of Homer, or glowed in the mind of Plato, can be rekindled afresh in the souls of the latest posterity. "The fare well address" of Washington will make the most illus trious deeds of the latter half of the eighteenth century be transacted over and over again in grateful memory, while a sense of genuine freedom, still more exalted virtue, disinterestedness and devotion to country, re tains its power over the human mind. To speak, to read, is the provision of nature and nature's God, through which we are cemented in virtue, in energy, and faithful purpose, with all that has ever been noble and good, with all that ever will be. LECTURE THE FOURTH; ST. AUGUSTINE AND BARON CUVIER, OR THE MEETING OF THE FIFTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES. Summary of preceding lecture. — Necessity of viewing man from different epochs of history ; his language and actions the only true criteria in the determination of his character The fifth and nineteenth centuries contrasted, in the persons of St. Augustine and Baron Cuvier; their characters and labors Value of the study of the writings of the fifth century Translation from the " City of God." — Picture of St. Augustine. — The reflection interesting, that each age contributes its peculiar mental commodity to the meeting of ages in the spi ritual world, where it is not unphilosophical to suppose that Augustine and Cuvier may have held converse Their imagined meeting and dialogue, exhi biting the exclusiveness which marked the pursuits of their respective epochs. — The theology ofthe fifth should combine with the science ofthe nineteenth century ; thus the Word of God would be illustrated by his works. In our last lecture, we traced the physical provision for human language, and showed its foundation in nature, its essential oneness, its formal diversity. Its natural foundation was discovered in the instrument itself of vocal expression, so artificially and studiously elaborated; — that it was connected with respiration and the organ — the lungs ; and that this organ seemed to be mainly designed by nature for this great end, since the aeration of the blood could be effected through other means than this singular apparatus. That in the insects, the aeration of the blood is in fact otherwise accomplished, and that in the Crustacea 92 LECTURE THE FOURTH. and fishes there is the rude form of the lungs, but not the organ itself; that at last in the birds and mammalia it is perfectly brought forth, and in man its remote and final purpose fully disclosed, — the pro duction of voice and the modifications of speech, the symbol of reason, and the very means of its perfection, uniting men in society, exciting the social affections, strengthening, expressing, and maturing them, and with them the moral sense, and the intellectual powers, the whole of which are combined into one delightful whole, and exhibited and embodied in this astonishing and divine edifice of language, no less complicated in its parts than harmonious in its results. That speech is therefore a part of humanity, as much as the existence of the social affections, without which, indeed, they could not well be manifested. That, accordingly, the origin of speech is not other than the origin of man himself; it is coeval with his being, and has its origin in God. That speech therefore existed in primeval society ; and that the Garden of Eden was vocal with other sounds than those of the happy irrational creation ; — that there wanted not then a speech as diversified, and as musical, and every day as new and original, as were the thoughts and joyous feelings of the men of that golden period. That this language could not be artificial, as ours, on reasons of analogy, but has its type in the slender voca bulary but expressive tones of that intellectual progeny, the singing birds of our forests; that then language must have been the entire, exact, and full expression of the whole soul, leaving no painful consciousness in the mind of the utterer, that the sounds did not altogether yield his sense ; and that, consequently, there could be no fixed forms of words, no stereotypes of thought descending from age to age, but the language of men must have been as the generations of the leaves of the NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 93 trees, new every season, but each word still exactly expressive, as each tree has also its form of leaf, which God has given it. to tell its characters, its species, and its use; and that therefore each man instinctively understood each other man, as Adam, or the " Man of that Age," is said, in sacred Writ, to have known the name of every living thing, that is, the indications of its true nature, marked on it by the hand of God, — and if then, of every living thing, why not also those articulated sounds and tones, which flowed from the lips of his brother man, which albeit the spontaneous product of his thought, and born but that hour, and original and new, yet must have fallen with all mean ing and expressiveness on the mind of one who wor shipped God similarly, and viewed all nature with a consenting mind, and genius, and affection. But in these latter ages the whole nature of the thing is changed. We understand not one another's speech, because our thoughts are now altogether our own, and no longer fraternal; we are estranged in mind, and hence in language, mind's representative ; but the gol den age seemed to revive, as with a brief gleam, in the days of the first apostles of Christianity ; they had the gift of understanding all tongues, because they had the endowment of universal philanthropy; this has been considered a pure miracle, and it was ; but miracles are the expression of laws to us unknown, and did not men entertain foolish ideas about the first language, they would understand better what was signified by "the gift of tongues." But that age of christian innocence quickly passed away; — whether it will be again re stored, it is not for me to speculate; — nor yet what must be the ultimate tendency of the present multi tude of artificial languages, or how they may again be melted down into a general, and spontaneous, and un- 94 LECTURE THE FOURTH. artificial language, — from which point they are at pre sent very remote, and the English most of all : — that, and many other inquiries on this subject, I shall not now pursue, for I am anxious to gather up into one view many of the sentiments of former lectures, and to survey them, if possible, from two widely differ ent epochs of history. By that means, we may be enabled to take some lateral views of our subject, — not regarding it in front merely, but under various other aspects, — of ages, of countries, of religions, of systems, and opinions, flourishing still, or long since extinct. But, in order to do this rightly and with effect, we must invest our minds, as it were, with the ideas and sentiments of past ages ; we must leave our own times, and our own language, — for I call our own language that which is at present spoken, whether English, Ger man, Italian, or French, — for in that is variously stereo typed the spirit of the age, the intellectual domination, which subdues us ; — we must divest ourselves of it, and seeking another language and an ancient epoch, thence, as from a watch-tower, mark the signs of our times, and with the view of ascertaining the essential and immutable principles of man, note the ever-shift ing features of opinion, sentiment, and engrossing pur suit, which, various and distracting as they may seem, are nevertheless the only positive phenomena from which the true theory of man can ever be determined. We may consider it now as settled, that |when the language of a people, the type of its peculiarities, has ceased to be spoken, and another has arisen in its place, sprung from the people themselves, as from the native earth, and at last adopted and polished by the learned, and made the instrument of their communications, — the spirit of the age is radically changed, a new dynasty of thinking has commenced, and it is expressed in this NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 95 new speech. The Latin language, for many ages, was the sole medium of intercourse between the learned of Europe, and while this was the case, preserved many valuable truths under the guise of ancient peculiarities ; but it reflected few or none of the popular or native tastes of the country or period. Since its disuse, the human mind, within the last two hundred years, stands entirely emancipated from the peculiarities of former ages, and is left free to invest itself with its own opinions, and to wear the livery at least of its own thoughts. How far it is more truly emancipated, it is not for me to determine ; I am concerned chiefly to exhibit the natural phases of its history and philosophy, and that too in such order as they may be most easily apprehended, whether that of strict method or of ram bling inquiry. It matters little in what order we approach the subject, provided we can impress upon our minds at last the chief and most conspicuous points of its truth and grandeur. With this view, and to have the full benefit of contrast, I shall bring before you this evening St. Augustine and Baron Cuvier, as specimens of men, and the one of the fifth, and the other of the nineteenth century. With the life and character of Cuvier you are already sufficiently acquainted to understand what he has to say ; with the life and character of St. Augustine you are, perhaps, not so familiar. St. Augustine lived in the close of the fourth, and the beginning of the fifth century, occupying about the same portion of each, that Cuvier did of the eighteenth and nineteenth. But how unlike the times in which they lived ! You are surrounded with the atmosphere of the nineteenth cen tury, — it is unnecessary to say any thing of it; but of the fifth, you are informed through history. It was, in many respects, a remarkable period; it saw the last 96 LECTURE THE FOURTH. receding shadows of paganism, or the old Gentile religion, vanish forever from its long-occupied and favorite seats, the south and east of Europe. There is something melancholy, even in the decline of an au gust form of superstition ; those who understand human nature can readily imagine with what tenacity the ancient inhabitants of Italy and Greece clung to those forms of worship and fascinating rites of polytheism, which, absurd as they may seem to us, were neverthe less at one time the sacred and revered expression of the religious feelings and imaginings of a noble portion of the human family. A sound philosophy would lead us to think that many of these forms of superstition had originated anciently in a just and pure conception of one God, and his revealed attributes; and in that primeval era, probably, they established their dominion over the minds of men, and thence became sanctioned by the usages of antiquity, and the veneration that is paid to the opinions and sentiments of earlier ages ; but succeeding times, in the age of St. Augustine, had long since ceased to recognize any thing either pure or rational in the rites of paganism ; if they once embo died the sentiments of a pure religion, it was no longer to be found in them, but nevertheless the people still clung to them with ardent devotion in many parts of the empire; — and Christianity, in those times, had to engage in a contest with these antiquated errors, and to prove their absurdity. This was a contest on which St. Augustine entered with great zeal, and he has devoted a large part of the first division of his grand work, the " City of God," to exposing the absurdities of the ancient superstition. This exposition is not with out its interests, on many accounts, and chiefly as an exhibition of the temper and character of the times ; you are, while reading it, in the midst of those great NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 97 questions which at the time perplexed and embarrassed the human understanding, and if you cannot help smiling occasionally at the extravagance of some, the thought will also cross your mind, that many of those inquiries, in which we are now engaged, are not in their own nature a whit more important, nay, per haps, a coming age may think them even less so, and the labors of St. Augustine, which have fallen into neglect, in these philosophical times, may yet once more engage the admiration of mankind. And so much the more may this be the case, as the decay of religions and their rise, and particularly their periods of transition, are no less replete with interest, than the physical revolutions of the globe, the grandeur and wonderfulness of which are likely to attract the great est minds of the age, and to the investigation of which, Cuvier has led the way. Probably, St. Augustine, in his time, would have regarded such researches as friv olous or impious, certainly no way to be compared with his own labors, when for so many years he inves tigated from the lights of sacred Scripture, what, and how various might be the forms and essences of truth, what sentences of condemnation would be passed on those polluted pagans, who still continued to worship, under the names of Juno, Jupiter, or Minerva, mali cious demons, the enemies of the human race, — what might be their fate, or what their excuse ; and what, on the contrary, the rewards of those suffering martyrs, who declared their faith in the face of persecution, and stood true to their vows, amid the most adverse and discouraging fortune. As St. Augustine cast his eyes backwards on the enchaining and beguiling forms of a lofty and magnificent paganism, — now sinking be neath the meekness and unpretending simplicity of Christianity, and saw the old retire, and the new com- 13 9S LECTURE THE FOURTH. ing to take its place, and rejoiced in the fond antici pations of an approaching milenium, — a dream which the earliest fathers habitually indulged, and which the most recent times have not yet abandoned, — how in significant to him would have seemed the most indus trious labors of Cuvier, — those energetic descriptions of animal life, — those nice and just discriminations, — and the astonishing instances of successful induction, with which his works abound. Sixteen centuries after his time, when every trace of that hostile paganism against which he warred was obliterated, and Christianity, in name at least, every where triumphant in the Euro pean world, could St. Augustine have fancied, that a philosopher would find no better or worthier employ ment, than to arrange and classify animals, or to inquire into the antiquity of the earth, or those physical revolu tions, which have, at different periods, affected its sur face ? Could he have thought, that a learned christian, for such subjects as these, would have abandoned his own lofty themes, respecting the free-will of man, original sin, the last conflagration, and the beatifications of the faithful, and the crowning splendors of "the city of God." All these were the engrossing topics, the favorite studies of the fifth century, and their impor tance seemed to cast all minor subjects in the shade; the spirit of inquiry was entirely theological, and hardly could a subject of different character have engaged serious notice. It is to be regretted, that we are so en tirely wedded to the prejudices of our own age, and so much imbued with the contempt of those ages of theo logical erudition, that we hardly even consider their ponderous folios worthy of our inspection. But he, who would comprehend, as far as possible, the true history of man, will read with care, such works as these, and imbibe for a time, even their prejudices, (if NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 99 they, were such,) in order to have a better insight into the real character of the human mind. Nor will his labors be lost, even in a practical view ; he will find many of his own prejudices dissipated, he will receive a more exalted idea of the Christian religion, when he peruses such works as those of St. Augustine, who de voted his whole soul to the subject, and endeavored so earnestly to portray its just features. For my own part, I have passed some of the most pleasant hours of my life, in perusing the Latin pages of St. Augustine, for although the style is far from classical, it has the charm of perfect originality, and gives utterance often, to the most sublime and touching sentiment. As a specimen of his style and manner, I shall trans late one short paragraph, which never before, I believe, flowed in English, and I do so the more willingly, as the ideas are intimately related with the subject of our lectures : "ON THE UNIVERSAL PROVIDENCE OF GOD." "God, the highest and the true, with his word and his holy spirit, for the three are one, — God, the One, the almighty, the creator, the maker of all soul and all body, — in communication with whom all are happy, who are truly such, who made man a being rational, of soul and body composed, — who has neither permitted him sinning to be unpunished, nor yet abandoned him without compassion, — who to the good and the evil has given essence in common with the minerals, a seminal existence in common with vegetables, a sen sual life in common with animals, and an intelligent soul in common with angels, — from whom is all mode, and all species, and all order, from whom is measure, and number, and weight, from whom every thing is, that naturally is, of whatever kind or estima- 100 LECTURE THE FOURTH. tion it be, from whom are seeds of forms, and the forms of seeds, the motions of seeds and of forms,— who to flesh has given origin, and beauty, and health, and fecundity, the disposition of limbs, and vigor, and harmony, — who in the irrational soul has implanted memory, and sense, and appetite, but to the rational soul has superadded thought and intelligence, and will, — who not only has fashioned the heaven and earth, not only angel and man, but even on the coating of the most insignificant insect, on the tiny feather of the smallest bird, on the most minute flower of the grass, on the leaflet of the shrub, has bestowed a finish and absolute fitness of parts ; — He cannot, on any ground whatever, be supposed to have abandoned the society of human kind, or to have left them at large, beyond the contact and government of his providence and laws " With this author then, being not a little conversant, and also having derived from him a vivid impression of the character of the age in which he lived, I long much to be able to convey to you some of those ideas and views of his mind and sentiments, which I have received. I seem to myself even now to behold him, as he was in the prime of life, after the renunciation of his youthful errors, and when the serene spirit of Chris tianity had softened and tamed the natural harshness of his character. I see his rugged countenance soften into benignity and energetic thought, as I gaze on it, and what at first seemed a frown on his lofty and manly forehead, is but the inviting aspect of a daring and sublime intelligence. There are calmness and mildness, and severity, at once combined in his looks; but his severity is not that of an angry temper, but of a resolute seeking for truth, and indignation of wrong; NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 101 but the elevation of his whole aspect, naturally directed upwards, shows one, who, even in his search for truth, was ambitious to meet with her only in her loftier forms, in her heavenly rather than in her earthly attire. The youthful Augustine wras one, in whose presence few would dare to be gay, but none was ever knowrn to be sad; mirth was sobered, and reason cheered in dis course with him. This age of ours is naturally infidel, but sometimes shows itself not incapable of believing; it has been listening some time to certain very marvellous tales, and whether true or false, I take it not upon me here to say. But you know, that not a few individuals, and those far from credulous or unphilosophical in other respects, have been able to credit lately — how a maiden, without ever moving from her couch, in Providence, in Rhode Island, could travel in mental vision, to a distant city, in company with a waking guide, he himself also standing still, and survey not a few objects of interest in this renowned city, and take a faithful inventory of doings and trans actions, and describe withal most graphically, im plements and pictures, which none before had ever seen, except herself and her companion there, — all this has been credited, and I do not say that I disbe lieve it; — I only wish, that as ready belief could be awarded to the fact, (if such could be supposed,) of a meeting between this St. Augustine, of whose writings and character, I have been giving some account, and the late Baron Cuvier, whose noble scientific character not less significantly marks the spirit of our era, than did that theological bent of Augustine display the pre vailing disposition of the fifth century. And it is a matter of interest to reflect — to those, who have not Teasoned themselves out of their Christianity, and that 102 LECTURE THE FOURTH. firm and innate belief, we have of another world — to reflect, I say, how each age and epoch bring into that world, their own distinctive contribution of intelli gence, and thought, and enlarged benevolence. Surely there, the philosophy of Plato is not divorced, as here, from the philosophy of Bacon, nor the philosophy of Bacon from the philosophy of Plato, but men are able to reason a priori and a posteriori too, — nor is there, theology in one corner, and science in another, but all receive the good of all. In short, each age, as it were, manufactures its own special mental commodity ; but in the meeting of the ages, in that universal Forum, while all communicate with all, and without losing their individual characters, they may be supposed to come by intuition, into full possession of the ideas of each other, and to have all their prejudices removed, and their narrowness extended. The fifth century might there meet the nineteenth, and in the persons of Augustine and Cuvier, hold no silly or unphiloso- phical colloquy, but one mutually instructive, rational^ and sublime, if there be indeed sublimity in truth, as assuredly there would be, if we could see all its parts on any one subject, brought into juxta-position, to form a perfect whole, and not separated, as is generally the case, by intervals of many centuries. But, for once, let the interval be supposed to be re moved, and let two sensible men, for good sense characterized them both, be believed to have met. Simplicity, and candor, and truth, must be enduring traits in the minds of Augustine and Cuvier ; although born in distant ages, they were not essentially unlike. St. Augustine. — Yes, Cuvier, your industry was un doubtedly laudable, and it has extended the domains of natural knowledge. Newton and yourself have each in your own peculiar provinces, enlarged the views of NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 103 mankind, and prepared a wider field for the glory of God, to be signalized, and be made to affect the human soul to its advantage. Cuvier. — But, St. Augustine, it has often been matter of astonishment to me, that you should have consumed so large a portion of your time, in writing that work you call "the City of God," the deep myste ries of which, I must confess, I never could unravel ; and I have lamented, that talents, so powerful as yours, should have been employed on a subject, so barren of useful truth, as that appears to have been. St. Augustine. — Cuvier, you must not underrate the importance of that work ; the spirit of the age called for it, for mine was the age of speculative theology, yours is devoted to physical research. You delved into the hidden depths and recesses of nature; I, on the contrary, attempted to explore those riches unsearch able, of moral and spiritual value, which are contained in the sacred Scriptures, and when I wrote my great work, on the city of God, it was with the design to show, that the laws which regulate the spiritual com monwealth, are as fixed and immutable in their char acter, as those which compel nature herself to be submissive to the will of the Creator, — which deter mine the revolution of the seasons, or the succession of day and night. Cuvier. — But you forget, Augustine, how your spec ulations at last terminated. You bound the human will in shackles of fate, you are the great lord of pre destination, and your work even now bolsters up that tottering fabric of mischievous opinions, which have so long darkened and bewildered the faith of mankind. St. Augustine. — And it were but another proof, Cuvier, of the natural servility of the human mind. But the doctrine in question was in my case unavoid- 104 LECTURE THE FOURTH. able ; I was driven to it, to raise a rampart against the Manicheans, whose system of opinions had much in fested my mind, in my youth. You know their belief in two principles, which contend for the government of the world, the one benign, the other malevolent, and that a perpetual and doubtful war is waged between them, while mankind are alike exposed to either influ ence, inclined sometimes to the one, sometimes to the other. Cuvier. — I have merely learned, Augustine, that such opinions existed, and that your youth was capti vated by them. St. Augustine. — And such, indeed, was the fact; but when that benignant Religion, whose smiles irradiate the whole creation, first dawned on my intellect, I quickly abandoned all these follies. Cuvier. — So history has informed us ; — and then, by a rapid transition, you passed from one absurdity to a worse, you became a fatalist in your creed, and you made your God the author of evil, in virtue of an irre vocable decree, and thus fixed on the minds of your followers, a more dangerous error, than that, from which you wished to deliver your Manichean associ ates. St. Augustine. — Cuvier, I cannot acknowledge these modern errors to be the legitimate offspring of the theology of the fifth century. I wished to delineate the form of a spiritual commonwealth, whose laws are not arbitrary but fixed and capable of being appre hended by the human mind. Such it appeared to me; but you know the imperfection of human language, and how incapable it is, to embody those gleams of truth, which strike the mind, in its contemplation of the works of God. And did those who succeed us, look to the same quarter for evidence, whence we our- NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 105 selves have derived it, instead of studying only that imperfect language, in which we have delivered it, fewer errors would descend to posterity, or rather fewer truths would be transmuted into errors, in the progress of transmission. Cuvier. — That is very certain ; but how came man kind to fall into such error in this case? St. Augustine. — I was myself partly in fault, Cuvier, — my language was not sufficiently guarded ; but it was my solicitude to conquer the Manicheans, which mis led me, for I designed to establish it, in opposition to their dogmas, that evil as well as good is under the dis position of one supreme God, and that nothing either good or evil can possibly happen, without his permis sion and knowledge; such is the tenor of those un changeable laws, which regulate the occurrence and order of all moral, as well as physical events. Cuvier. — I am happy to find, Augustine, that your theology on this point is not so irrational as 1 had been led to suppose : — but I cannot help thinking, that your age was too exclusively theological. St. Augustine. — The nineteenth century is making amends for that error, Cuvier; in the pursuit of science, theology is now in danger of being forgotten; nature has engrossed your whole attention; the ministers of religion are no longer the best intellects of the age ; the services of the sanctuary are abandoned altogether to the hearts of men; their understandings appear to have found other employments. Cuvier. — Every period has its own predominant character, Augustine; mankind, like the individuals who compose it, are great only by fits and starts, and in single things; one engrossing pursuit is enough for an age, and it is then the season for minds of a peculiar stamp, to show their native superiorities. Had you 14 106 LECTURE THE FOURTH. been born in the nineteenth century, Augustine, you would have made but a sorry figure ; your pious medi tations and profound speculations in theology would have found but little favor from learned bodies, our royal societies, and national institutions. St. Augustine. — Quite as much, I should suppose, Cuvier, as your own speculations about the antiquity of the earth, would have been likely to meet with from a synod of bishops in the fifth century, and indeed, you say truly, that each age has its own predominant fea tures, tastes, and propensities, and rightly too, that each may be fitted and inclined to discharge the offices which are allotted it, and to make its own dis tinctive contributions to the general stock of human knowledge; and it was not therefore without reason, that you were engaged in an exposition of the or der and laws of the animal kingdom, and I was sum moned to a different task, to unfold the economy of "the city of God." Cuvier. — I am willing to believe, that the task as signed to each, by the requisitions of the age was most propitious and happy, and such as no chance could have directed. St. Augustine. — But theology came first, science has succeeded. Cuvier. — And perhaps from the succession, the hap piest results may yet follow. St. Augustine. — There is reason to presume so much, — but your conjecture? Cuvier. — I see but this, Augustine, that your "city of God" is far too resplendent an object for the weak and feeble sight of mortals to contemplate, and that there is needed a mirror, if I may say so, to reflect its splendors, with so mild and natural a light, that its form may be seen, without its overpowering brightness; NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 107 and if the sciences of modern ages can supply this de sideratum, (as I have a presentiment they may,) suc ceeding times will have cause to congratulate them selves on the possession of double advantages, — they will have the light of your period with the demonstra tions of ours. — in practical union. St. Augustine. — Your anticipations coincide with my own hopes, and 1 see in the order of nature, and especially in the arrangements of the animal kingdom, the very mirror you speak of. Cuvier. — And a very perfect mirror, indeed, it seems to me. St. Augustine. — And so much the more glorious, when men shall make the right use of it. Cuvier. — But do you see any reason to apprehend, that this may be reluctantly done, — or what signs of our times do you observe from a favorable position? St. Augustine. — I entertain good hopes, Cuvier, but as you have just now said, that you considered our age to have been too exclusively theological, too much addicted, 1 presume you mean, to the abstractions of religion, or too easily misled by the delusive lights of opinion, so I see your times ready to incur a danger of a similar kind, or rather indeed already in the midst of it. Cuvier. — I am not sure that I understand what dan ger in particular you allude to. St. Augustine. — The danger of being too much enamored with their own discoveries, Cuvier, — no slight one, you will allow, or one which a wise man would not most ardently wish to be delivered from. Cuvier. — I must confess it is so, Augustine, the most fascinating species of danger; but yet it does not strike me, that our age is so much exposed on this score, as some others; we have discarded the fallacies 108 LECTURE THE FOURTH. of absurd opinion, and fixed our scrutiny on the laws of nature; not systems, but facts, now challenge the admiration of mankind. Surely our own speculations no longer mislead us. St. Augustine.— And so it always is, Cuvier; each age believes that to be firm ground, where it is itself treading. For, do you suppose, that the fifth century believed, that they were contending only for their own opinions, when they were vindicating the true texts and doctrines of the sacred Scriptures. But we are short-sighted, Cuvier, remarkably short-sighted ;— and your century and the last having entered on a fresh field of investigation, have become blind to the value of that better truth, which was at least, earnestly sought, if not actually attained in former ages. And because physical truth is now the main object of your affection and search, you have nearly forgotten, that there is any other in existence. Cuvier. — But at least you will acknowledge that we have succeeded in the attainment of our object? St. Augustine. — With due allowance, Cuvier ; — and some of you have attained it, and are modest enough to appreciate its quality and degree : but not such I think, is the general spirit of the age, and of this I speak. Cuvier. — What is, Augustine, pray declare ; let the unprejudiced light of the fifth century fall upon the nineteenth, that we may see ourselves, and also you. St. Augustine. — I will only indicate what I feel and think, most noble Cuvier, and your candor will excuse. But it seems to me an error of your period, that it is too much disposed to consider what it has discovered of truth, in any case, as the whole that belongs to it, and from the admiration of a few circumstances de tected by experiments and instruments, is prone to fancy that it has led the truth captive, and that the NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 109 very work indeed of Omnipotence is subjected to its gaze; — and in short, Cuvier, you appear to me, (I speak of the multitude of philosophers,) to be falling into the same error, in regard to physical science, which was so fatal to us in the fifth century, in regard to Divine knowledge. The real Word of God was lost sight of, in fastening our attention exclusively on those points of its doctrines which we endeavored to bring within the compass of our definitions and cate gories. And many of the simple, at last, had a juster impression of the whole than the learned, who, in the examination of minute parts, lost sight of the general bearing, and the divine inspiration. Your errors, I say, in your own province, are not very unlike to those ; you are constantly mistaking the circumstances of natural operations for the things themselves, and the grandeur of nature is felt the less for it, and your own importance the more. So that, let me tell you, the arro gance of the age is become excessive, (1 hope many are exempt,) and you have not only lost sight of the living cause of physical phenomena, but do not even see the more natural and obvious grandeur of the effects, while from a species of self-admiration you laud your own times, and depreciate ours, that one might be inclined to believe, that wisdom was not born until the eighteenth century at least, and did not learn to speak until the nineteenth, — when you have invented for her a new language of chemical and other learned terms, which, at the same time serve very well to emblazon your own discoveries, — to rivet your attention on these and on yourselves. Cuvier. — But you must allow that this language has become necessary? St. Augustine. — I am very far from being disposed to 110 LECTURE THE FOURTH. undervalue the language or the facts, which it serves to express; but you know what an influence words exercise on the minds of the multitude ; and while the new vocabulary of science recalls those parts of physi cal actions which are explained, it leaves the others, much the most numerous and generally the most admi rable, altogether out of sight, so that a more broken and imperfect view of the beauty and greatness of those natural occurrences is, at last, often taken, than if the mind were left to its own general and unbiassed im pressions of them. Cuvier. — I must confess there is reason in what you say, and I acknowledge that this evil is incident to the popular views of modern discoveries. St. Augustine. — And it will receive the best illus tration from your own science of anatomy and physio logy. We preachers of the fifth century, whose fund of natural knowledge was exceedingly scanty, indulged at least a feeling of reverence and awe, when we con templated the works of nature, and we called them the works of God. And when we spoke of man, it was as the image of God, for we had not yet learned from anatomy this material science, to think of man as an image of the animals. Cuvier. — Then you viewed him generally, not par ticularly ?