'-"-"Yale Univer^ly Library ^iiii?iiis» 39002005158192 ^iiiiil» : /if tie fat^niSag The Speech was brief, and did not predict o^ ask much legislation, and the session, in view of the fact that a general election was imminent, was a short one. Allusion was made in the Address to fhe fact that, although the arbitration respecting the northern and western boundaries had been declared four years ago, no action had followed on the part of the Dominion Govern ment, and dissatisfaction naturally existed in conse quence of this regrettable condition of public affairs. His Honor was able to report a largely increased im migration, and declared the lumbering interests of the country to be prosperous. Bills were to be submitted making changes in the High and Public Schools Act, and were to be considered in connection with street railways, election law, and kindred matters. 17 257 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA The report from the License Department stated that the temperance people were determined to resist all attempts to relax the laws for restricting the liquor traffic. Messrs. Balfour and Drury moved the Address to His Honor. The Opposition made the usual denunciation of lack of economy in the expenditure of public moneys, and Mr. Bell attempted to effect amendments in the Public and Separate Schools Act. The general election followed, the nominations being made on the 20th of February, and the polling on the 26th, terminating in favor of the Governnient. Some of the men whose appearance in the Legislature dates from this Parliament were: Hon. John Morrison Gibson, first elected a member of the Legislative Assembly for Hamilton in the year 1879, and again in 1883, 1886, -1890, 1894, and after wards for East Wellington. He was called to the Government, and held office from the 18th of January, 1889, to the 2 1st oT July, 1896, having filled the various positions of Provincial Secretary, Commissioner of Crown Lands, and Attorney-General. He was Provin cial Secretary from the i8th of January, 1889, to the 2ist of July, 1896; Commissioner of Crown Lands from the 21st of October, 1899, until the close of the Ross Administration. When he acted as Chair man of the Private Bills Committee, it was generally acknowledged that he was eminently fitted for the per formance of his duties. A thorough knowledge of law, a practical acquaintance with public needs, a faculty of discovery of " the nigger in the fence " which Mat thew Crooks Cameron declared existed in every private bill, and an obstinate adherence to what he believed to be right, made him at home in the chair in the 258 STREAMS BILLS AND BOUNDARIES Private Bills Committee room, and it is to be hoped that the numerous men who in turn may occupy it may be as well prepared to properly fill it. He seemed intuitively to realize the dubious points of every measure brought before him, and when he observed the slightest weakness he pointed it out, and the Committee usually had sufficient faith in his judgment to think his views worthy their acceptance, and acted in accordance with the suggestions which he had made. He was a thorough man of business, and largely increased his knowledge of State affairs during his occupancy of a Cabinet position. He appeared to be successful in his numerous avocations. As a lawyer, dealing largely with commercial trans actions, he was one of fortune's favorites. It is difficult to write freely of men still living, and yet there are some of whom it is safe to express a candid opinion. Of these is John M. Gibson, and in his case there is, fortunately, little to be said other than of a pleasing character. A man taking an active part in politics could not, if he faithfully discharged his duty, escape the tongue of the maligner or the libel of the partisan. That he has done his duty to his country is undeniable. As a military man he has admirably helped to develop the spirit of self-defence which is essential to the protection of a country claiming control of half a continent. Early and late, in person as in spirit, he has admirably main tained his place as one willing to defend his native land. and, next to his own immediate interests, he has sought to advance those of the Canadian volunteer. A reliable marksman, a well disciplined officer, a born soldier, he has given much valuable time to the advancement of the strength and utility of our citizen soldiery. He has never withheld personal or pecuniary sacrifice when it has been deemed necessary. He has twice accompanied the 259 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA Bisley team to Great Britain, once as its commanding officer, and had an early experience as a combatant at Ridgeway, where he first saw men under fire. As a student he was distinguished by his thorough applica tion to his educational literary work, and won prizes of which any aspirant to literary honors might be proud. Of his political career men who know him best, even of his opponents, speak most highly, and they tell of his strict personal honor, his freedom from rancor, and his generosity to an opponent when in the height of the keenest debate. If he attains the average age of men, and is not weighed down by the load of anxiety which every politician and commercial man carries daily, he will be heard of more often in the future, probably, than in the past. As. a speaker he is deliberate, if not painfully slow, in opening up any question, and has a fuller use of lan guage when spurred by provocation and attack than when carefully balancing nearly every sentence as he thoroughly works his way to a desired end. His retirement from public life was an unfortunate necessity, for it came about largely, if not altogether, through serious ill-health, from which all right-minded men will hope that he may permanently recover. Hon. John Dryden, who entered the Legislative As sembly as member for the constituency of South Ontario, took his seat on January 7th, 1880, being elected at the general election of 1879. He brought into the Legis lature from his own locality the title of " Honest John Dryden," and it was frequently applied to him. He is a man of intelligence, a good talker, and an apt scholar. Knowledge of many kinds he can boast, and he never spoke — although taking a liberal share of debate after his first session — without having something to say which 260 STREAMS BILLS AND BOUNDARIES was worth listening to. He speedily " went up head." He had an aptitude for practical farming, was highly successful as a stock-breeder, and controlled one of the finest farms in, not only the county of Ontario, but throughout the province. He was invited to join the Cabinet as Minister of Agriculture, and accepted the responsibilities of the position with hesitation, it may have been, but with the self-assurance that he was equal to the task which had been assigned to him. The Agri cultural College and Model Farm were in existence, and had survived and promised to outlive the attacks which an active Opposition brought to bear upon them. He was master of the situation, knew what he was talking about, could intelligently discuss every objection brought against management or methods, and became as well known as an agricultural expert in the Northern and Western States as in his own province. His task was of no small magnitude, but he appeared to enjoy the per formance of it. He was as fully at home in fruit culture as in the growth of wheat. He was proficient in the handling of stock, and knew every point of the perfect horse. He became the head of the College practically as well as theoretically, and if he did not assume the title, he certainly discharged many of the duties connected with it. The experimental plot was his playground. He was constantly searching out new objects upon which to spend money for the benefit of the farmer — with a large F, remember — and found it. From the township show up he was constantly effecting improvements. He carried a model dairy to every homestead, a spraying machine to every fruit farm, and a cheese factory of improved methods to every group of townships. Literature on matters agricultural was distributed broadcast. Agri cultural knowledge was brought to every school-house 261 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA where intelligent trustees became acquainted with its value. And better than all — ^but this is still a moot point— he was invited by the Imperial Government to visit Ireland and devise some scheme for the better cultivation of Irish soil and the better management of Irish agricultural operations. And there is yet work for him to do. James MacMahon, M.D., a Reformer, entered the Legislature as member for North Wentworth in 1880. He sat for the constituency in 1884, 1887, 1891, and was appointed issuer of law stamps. He was an acceptable speaker, although he did not bore the House with un- desired efforts in that direction. He fearlessly expressed his views, nevertheless, and they had weight with his fellow-members. He was a warm admirer of Mr. Mowat. John Waters, Esq., entered the- Legislative Assem bly as member for North Middlesex in 1880, and was returned for the Legislatures of 1884, 1887, and 1891, and afterwards appointed registrar. He has discharged the duties of his office with zeal and close attention. As a plain talker upon every-day subjects he gave indi cations of an uncommon mind, and there was no advanced reform upon which he had not a pronounced opinion, or one which he was afraid to express. In Scot land or England he would have been known as a Chartist or pronounced Radical. He did not espouse this or that question because it was new, but solely because it ex pressed the views of progressive men and women. Although the House found amusement in his advocacy of Woman's Rights, he never hesitated to assert them and their advancement, with the latest views upon the subject. John B. Freeman, Esq., the representative of North 262 STREAMS BILLS AND BOUNDARIES Norfolk for a considerable period, first took his seat in 1880. He sat in the House from that date during the Legislatures of 1884 and 1887, when his health failed and he had to retire. To say that he was one of the most genial of the many " good fellows " who have served in the Ontario Assembly is to give him faint praise. He acted as " whip " for the Liberals dur ing several sessions, and enjoyed the utmost confidence of Hon. O. Mowat and his colleagues. In the hope of effecting an improvement in his health, Mr. Freeman took a sea trip to California, as did Hon. T. B. Pardee, but in both cases the remedy was resorted to at too late a period to be of avail. William Morgan, Esq., member for South Norfolk, was a sturdy defender of Conservative principles. He entered the Chamber in 1880, and occupied a seat therein after the elections of 1884 and 1887. He was a fair speaker, a good business member, and had an agreeable personal manner which brought him many friends. Charles Drury, Esq., East Simcoe, was elected at a bye-election in 1882, and speedily assumed an active share in the work of the House and his constituency. He was re-elected at the general election of 1883, and was unseated in November, 1884, and re-elected in June, 1885, and at the following general election. He had a full knowledge of agricultural operations, theoretically and practically, and, entering the Government, became, on the 1st of May, 1888, the first Minister of Agricul ture. He did much to convince the people of the high importance of the School of Agriculture and the Model Farm at Guelph, and his addresses in many portions of the province were important factors in extending the general knowledge of the interests over which he presided. 263 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA David Near, Esq., the Conservative member for Wel land in the fourth Legislature, was elected in 1879. He was not a man of extreme views, and sometimes passed beyond party bounds. He was not a talker, but still another of the municipal men who can tell you how a statute works and are full of amendments. He lived near Ridgeway, and on the famous 2nd of June, 1867, went down to see the Fenians repulsed by the Canadian volunteers. He always chuckled when he told how, seeing the Fenians running one way and the volunteers the other, he thought it time that he too should run, and made a faster trip home than when he came out to see the engagement. John Cascaden, Esq., M.D., represented West Elgin in 1880, and again in 1884. He was a finished speaker in the natural and oratorical style which distin guished him. The matter of his speeches was as finished as his manner, and the announcement of the fact that he was on his feet soon filled the chairs — not so much because what he said was more weighty than what others uttered, but because of the elocution and attractive man nerisms which were worth hearing and observing. He was a hard fighter, and met with much opposition which he succeeded in controlling. James Laidlaw, Esq., was elected member for South Wellington in 1879, and sat in 1884 for the constituency. He was a welcome speaker when he rose to address the Chair, and had a sense of humor which was acceptable in an assembly which did not always distinguish itself in that direction. James Henry Metcalfe, Esq., was selected as pro vincial representative of the city of Kingston at the elec tion of 1879. He was one of the fun-makers of the Assembly, and his utterances — some of them much to the 264 STREAMS BILLS AND BOUNDARIES point — were listened to with a broad grin on nearly every face, although there were some legislators who would have regarded the most exquisite fooling with a frown of disapprobation. I remember one special occa sion on which the whole Chamber roared with laughter, because, having just come from a dinner at Government House, he furnished everybody with an appetizing repro duction of the menu, and assured us, in a very confiden tial style, how much he had admired the orange groves — otherwise the greenhouse — to his heart's content, and had walked therein, with the charming hostess, until he thought himself in Paradise, or some similar but equally pleasant locality. Mr. Metcalfe was a keen sportsman, and could ride or handicap a horse with full knowledge of the work, and instruct the members in all the intricacies of whist and euchre. He had a warm heart, and was popular because of his excessive good-nature. He had taught Kingston schoolboys in his youth, and many of them followed his lead at election times. He ended his public career in the Penitentiary, as an excellent Warden and efficient official. W. James Parkhill, Esq., represented South Sim coe, and was a Conservative. He was elected in 1879. He was Grand Master of the Orange organization, was genial in manner, and exhibited force in the presentation of his views. He succeeded D'Arcy Boulton, who had succeeded Thomas R. Ferguson when the latter died soon after he captured the seat at the general election of 1875. A. F. Wood, Esq., of Madoc, member for North Hastings, was a ConservatTve, and one of the prominent men of his party while in the Legislature. He was a good speaker, and not a bore. His appearances on the oratorical stage were not too frequent. He afterwards sat in the Dominion Parliament. 265 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA George D. Hawley, Esq., succeeded Mr. Grange as member for Lennox, and was the opposite of his pre decessor in nearly every respect. He was a speaker of rather more than average ability, as was shown when he moved the Address in 1886. In 1884 he was defeated by A. Hale Roe, an eccentric, who did not survive a con troverted election trial, but was defeated by Hawley. Frederick John French, Esq., barrister, was elected for South Grenville for the fourth Legislature, 1879. He was accepted as a legal authority by the Conserva tives of his day, and made a special study of parlia mentary practice. A moderately able speech was made by him at infrequent intervals, and he was a tactician of no small ability. He was not beloved by C F. Fraser, as they had been opposing candidates, but their political differences did not extend into personal matters. Mr. French held his seat for several Legislatures, having been elected and re-elected in 1880, 1884, and 1887, the constituency having very marked Conservative tendencies. Hon. James Young was elected to a seat in the Legis lative Assembly in 1879, having previously been for several years in the House of Commons. South Water loo was his constituency, and he had been identified from early youth with the interests of Gait and the sur rounding country, owning and editing a Reform paper there for several years, and serving on the school and council boards. With this experience and a marked liking for public life, and industrious devotion to its duties, it is no wonder Mr. Young took a leading part in the Legislature. He was made a member of the Executive Council in 1883, but ill-health soon caused his resignation. His name was identified with much 266 STREAMS BILLS AND BOUNDARIES useful legslation in the Dominion House, and always has he been busy with his pen. A general election was held in February, 1883, and the first session of the new Legislature was called for the 23rd of January, 1884. Hon. J. B. Robinson was Lieut.-Governor, and Charles Clarke was re-elected Speaker. The Speech from the Throne was of more than com mon importance. Reference was made in favorable terms to the new Governor-General, the Marquis of Lansdowne, who had been appointed successor to the Marquis of Lorne. His Honor announced the fact that the traffic in intoxicating liquors had been authoritatively pronounced to be wholly within the legislative powers of the province. The House was asked to consider the fact that, at the last session of the Dominion Parliament, an Act was passed declaring that the main line of railways in the province, and all lines now or hereafter connecting with them, shall be subject to the legislative authority of the Parliament of Canada; and to consider whether the British North America Act was intended to enable the Federal Parliament to interfere in this manner with the legislative authority of the province. He stated that, as a result of negotiations between his Government and that of Manitoba, a case had been agreed upon for the refer ence of the dispute respecting the interprovincial bound ary to the Judicial Committee of Pier Majesty's Privy Council. The first question to be decided under that reference would be the validity of the award made by the arbitrators in 1878, and a controlling condition was that the hearing should take place during the then current year. 267 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA The Address, moved by Mr. Mclntyre, seconded by Mr. Sills, reproduced the Speech. It was debated for several days. On motion of Mr. Hardy, seconded by Mr. Fraser, it was made to declare that the House hastened to announce to His Honor that it was the duty of the Government to take all the necessary steps to firmly maintain the constitutional and legislative rights of the province to regulate and control the liquor traffic. The mental condition of the Hon. Adam Crooks had become such, in the month of December, 1883, that he was unfitted for the discharge of his parliamentary duties, and in due course his seat was declared vacant. A few months afterwards he died. Hon. a. Crooks, it will not be out of place here to state, was one of those courteous, amiable men whose com panionship makes life worth living, and, although lack ing some of the force of more vigorous men, was a good executant, a deep reasoner, and an honest custodian of the interests of those whose agent he became. His death was generally deplored, and he holds in the memory of his countrymen a position which any public man might properly desire to attain. In looking about for the best available successor to Mr. Crooks, whose sudden break-down had left the province without a Minister of Education, Mr. Mowat felt impelled to go outside the House, and offered the position to George W. Ross, Esq., then a member of the House of Commons. Mr. Ross accepted the invita tion, resigned his seat at Ottawa, and was elected M.P.P. for West Middlesex, where he was afterwards re-elected at every subsequent general election until his final retire ment to enter the Dominion Senate. He was appointed Minister of Education on the 23rd of November, 1883, and held the office for nearly sixteen years, when, being 268 STREAMS BILLS AND BOUNDARIES called upon to form a cabinet, he became Premier of Ontario, and chose to administer what he regarded as the less onerous Treasury Department. After the election of 1905 he acted as leader of the Opposition, and since then has been called to the Senate. Mr. Ross is in every respect one of the most distin guished sons of the Dominion, and though he has been subject to severe, if not chronic, attacks of rheumatism, has, in whatever capacity he has served the people, proved himself eminently well-fitted for the discharge of duties appertaining to his office. He has always been a persistent worker, and systematically goes through his daily routine of reading and correspondence. He is a mentally busy man, and is never more happy than in pre paring a speech, meeting a deputation, or consulting with political friends, and is, I doubt not, as hard a worker to-day as when carrying the weight of the laborious duties of the premiership of Ontario. And he has always found time to be affable with a visitor, and to break in upon his avocations when advice has been asked. He never sent away a deputation or an individual to whom he had not exhibited the utmost courtesy and given ad vice or information as requested. He regarded honest attention as the due of every man who approached him. His political have exceeded his literary occupations, but his pen has not been idle, and from it we have many valuable contributions on educational and kindred sub jects, matters with which his experience, leading through varied stages from the schoolroom to the minister's desk, has given him peculiarly intimate acquaintance. He also prepared the Life of Alexander Mackenzie, a most stimu lating biography and excellent political handbook. No record of our social progress would be complete without mention of Mr. Ross's efforts in behalf of tem- 269 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA perance. If these did not produce all the results ex pected, sufficient allowance was probably not made for the difficulty of reconciling the attitude of a Premier, bound to consider all men's views, with that of the thorough-going temperance reformer. Nothing prac tical can be gained by being too far in advance of general public opinion. As a speaker, Mr. Ross's eloquence has carried his fame from the Bay of Fundy to the Pacific, and when ever Canada is spoken of, the name of George W. Ross comes foremost to the remembrance of the critic. A red-letter day for the women of Ontario was the 5th of March, 1884, for on that date a motion was car ried, on a division of 43 yeas to 26 nays, in favor of the second reading of a bill to enable widows and unmarried women to vote at municipal elections. ' On March 13th, Mr. Pardee moved resolutions in the last paragraph of which was a declaration " That this House deems it a duty to firmly protest against the en croachments of the Federal Parliament on the rights of the province, and to assert the rights of the people of every province to exercise, through their Legislatures, exclusive jurisdiction over railways and works of a local and provincial character, and to supervise and regulate the conduct of all companies owning or operating such works." Mr. Meredith moved an amendment, in the shape of resolutions concluding with the words, " That it is the opinion of this House that the best interests of the province demand that this House should, as it does hereby, assert its just right, in respect of the matter hereinbefore set forth, as set out and defined in these resolutions, and that communication should at once be had with the Federal authorities, with a view to procur- 270 STREAMS BILLS AND BOUNDARIES ing the repeal, during the present session of the Dominion Parliament, of the Act of the said Parliament herein before referred to, in so far as it derogates from the rights of this province as herein set forth, and that the course of practice to be hereafter adopted in the exercise of the powers conferred upon the Dominion Parliament, in respect of the matters to which these resolutions relate, where it is proposed to exercise such powers, should be defined in accordance with the principles hereinbefore set forth." Mr. Hardy moved, in amendment to the amendment, seconded by Mr. Fraser : " That this House again firmly insists that where a company whose railway has been constructed under a provincial charter seeks to escape provincial control by procuring its railway to be declared to be for any such general advantage as aforesaid, the company ought to be compelled to first procure from the provincial Legislature, by which it is incorporated, an assent to its railway being so declared, or at least to show^ that such assent was applied for, and, if refused, has been so refused on improper or insufficient grounds." The amendment to the amendment, having been put, was carried: Yeas, 47; nays, 32. On the 17th of March, 1884, the Attorney-General, rising in his place, addressed the Speaker, and requested that he would read to the House letters placed in his hands. Mr. Speaker then read two letters — one from Robert McKim, member of the House for North Wellington, covering ten one-hundred-dollar bills ; and another from W. D. Balfour, member for South Essex, covering bills to the value of $800, to influence these gentlemen to vote in the Assembly against the Government. As may be believed, the House was lost in its amaze- 271 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA ment at the stupidity, as well as criminality, of the pro ceedings on the part of those who had attempted to bribe men sworn " to be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty." The Attorney-General placed before the House his statement of the affair, and moved that the matter be referred to the Committee of Privileges and Elections, which was invested with full powers to call for persons and papers. A detailed account of the action of all con cerned will be found in the succeeding chapter, which tells of the course pursued by what Mr. Fraser termed a " Brawling Brood of Bribers." Two of the more important bills of the session were, one for the better prevention of corrupt and illegal prac tices at elections, and one for the amendment of the election law. Many amendments were proposed, but only two were adopted, the Attorney-General declaring that, while some of them were good, he was inclined to think that, on the w^hole, his own provisions were better. The work of the session was comprised of ninety-seven acts, which received the Royal assent on March 25th, when the House was prorogued. The second session of this Legislature began on the 28th of January, 1885, and the Speech of His Honor, John Beverley Robinson, congratulated the House upon the fact that the Judicial Committee of Her Majesty's Privy Council had, so far as they had dealt with the question, adjudged the true boundaries of the province to be such as were awarded by the- arbitrators. The Government of Ontario was anxious to have submitted to the same tribunal the question of our whole northern boundary. Correspondence relating thereto would be laid before the House. r-A"}". ,1^.^.^^ BAKifl-' (*¦ 272 STREAMS BILLS AND BOUNDARIES After the decision of the Privy Council, a proclama tion had issued bringing into force the Act of the pre ceding session with respect to the Provisional District of Thunder Bay, and another erecting "The Territorial District of Rainy River." Further legislation would be necessary. He had also to congratulate them upon the fact that the Privy Council had pronounced a judgment in regard to the legal rights of the public in the rivers and streams of the province, affirming- the views so strenuously main tained by the Provincial Legislature. He had further to give expression to his satisfaction that the questions submitted to the Supreme Court of Canada, touching the validity of the License Acts passed by the Federal Parliament of 1883 and 1884, had been answered by the Supreme Court to the effect that (with certain considerable exceptions) these enactments ex ceeded the jurisdiction of the Federal Parliament. The confusion which those Acts created had thus been removed. Many minor questions were referred to, and legisla tion invited, but it is unnecessary to further specify them here. Justices Boyd and Cameron, in their reports as elec tion trial judges, stated that they had disagreed in their decisions. The bill (No. 147) relating to Lord's Day excursions came up for third reading on March 27th, when Mr. Fraser moved in amendment, seconded by Mr. Hess, that " whilst Bill 147 seeks to prohibit the operating on Sundays of railway excursion trains, it makes no pro vision against the operating of ordinary freight or pas senger trains on Sunday; that it seeks to prohibit the running on Sunday of steamboats for excursions, biit 18 273 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA makes no provision against the running or operation on Sunday of any other craft, whether for profit or plea sure; that it would not prohibit the wealthy man from spending dollars in taking a Sunday excursion for plea sure, but it would prevent the poor man from spending as many cents for a like purpose; that the bill, if it becomes law, will operate mainly, if not entirely, against the just liberty and right of the working and poorer classes to have legitimate and reasonable opportunities for rest and relaxation on Sunday; and therefore said bill should not now be read a second time." Yeas, 8; nays, 57. March 27th brought many members to their feet with objections to the proposed rearrangement of constitu encies, but this did not seriously affect the ministerial plan, which was carried with few alterations, and on the 28th it received its third reading, and was intituled, " An Act to amend the Laws relating to the Franchise and the Representation of the People." His Honor the Lieut.-Governor gave Royal assent to ninety-nine Acts, and prorogued the House. He with held assent from a bill, entitled, " An Act to correct cer tain clerical errors in the Consolidated Jurors Act of 1883," the purpose thereof having been provided for by the Act for further improving the Administration of the Law. Looking over the division lists of these sessions, there are a few names of new members whom one remembers as men of rather more than ordinary promise. Among them were — H. P. O'Connor, Esq., who was a Reformer, elected for South Bruce in 1883. He held the seat in the general elections of 1886 and 1890, when the split caused by the , Patrons of Industry, changed some Reform ridings into 274 STREAMS BILLS AND BOUNDARIES doubtful constituencies. For a time the movement brought about marked changes, but the policy was too narrow to secure unbounded success. Good men were driven from public life, it is true, but their substitutes satisfied nobody, and now it is difficult to name half a dozen of the Patrons who have, as representatives, influenced public Hfe in one way or other. H. P O'Connor was full of courageous humor, and told them, again and again, that by desertion of the Reform ranks they simply played into the hands of their most deter mined opponents, and helped to build a platform which could not be durable. He was an excellent speaker, a keen debater, and an honest man — three high qualifica tions for a public life. He had an untimely end, having been thrown from his horse and killed. Nicholas Awrey, Esq., member for South Went worth in the Legislatures of 1884, 1887, 1891, and 1895, was a popular and energetic representative. He was , Commissioner for Ontario at the Chicago World's Fair, and displayed aptitude for business and public affairs, but failing health removed him from such activities, and he died at an early age. He was succeeded in the House by John Dickinson, Esq., a man of equal popularity. H. E. Clarke, Esq., a Conservative, represented West Toronto in 1884 and 1887, and was re-elected in 1891. He was an able critic of finance, and well up in city municipal matters. His manner was courteous, and one never heard a slang word from him, even when oppor tunities were tempting. He suffered from heart disease, and anticipated sudden death. He was addressing the House on the subject of assessment one day. Mr. Hardy entered the chamber just as Mr. Clarke was con cluding his remarks, and requested the speaker to repeat some of what he had said, as the subject wa,s one in '27s SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA which he took great interest. Mr. Clarke proceeded to comply, when he suddenly fell forward upon the floor of the House and immediately died. How shocking this was to all who witnessed it may be imagined. James Clancy, Esq., member for West Kent in 1883, 1887, and 1 89 1, was afterwards elected to the Commons, and has more recently been appointed Auditor-General of Ontario by the Whitney Administration. His knowledge of financial matters, for he had been engaged in lumber ing operations and mercantile affairs, was of more than ordinary character and extent, and eminently fitted him for the position which he has been called upon to fill. J. Wellington McLaughlin, Esq., M.D., took his seat for West Durham on January 23rd, 1884, and was re-elected in 1887. He was a Reformer, and a speaker of average ability, a hard worker at his desk, and an industrious committee-man. Charles Oaks Ermatinger, Conservative, was first elected for East Elgin in 1883, and sat until 1886. He was not a rabid partisan, but made a good speech, and was always listened to when he addressed the Assembly. He was full of drollery then — and probably is now — and was a clever caricaturist. William Kerns, Esq., represented the county of Halton as successor to William Barber, the old and respected first member from that constituency. The Riding was always close, and Mr. Kerns's majority was a small one, but he held the seat from 1883 through four successive Legislatures. A fair-minded man, he was free from excessive partyism, but always found the support of Conservative measures his imperative duty. As commanding officer of the 20th Halton Battalion for a time, he was popular and much respected by his men. ?76 CHAPTER XXI. THE BRIBERY CASE. Letters for House — The envelopes opened — Money and letters — The Attorney-General's statement — Excitement and consternation — ^^C. F. Fraser and his diatribe — Leaders of the House shocked by the disclosures — Committee on Privileges and Elections — After the case was opened — A Commission appointed — Issued to Judges Proudfoot, Scott and Senkler — Enquiry by Commission opened 14th July, 1884 — Report dated ioth January, 1885 — Counsel appointed — Extracts frora Report. When I took the Chair in the Legislative Assembly on the evening of the 17th of March, 1884, I carried with me that which was destined to create a wide sensation when laid before the House. Robert McKim, member for North Wellington, and Wm. D. Balfour, member for South Essex, had each given to me, in the afternoon of that day, a letter addressed to me as Speaker. Open ing the outer envelope, I found that there was a second and sealed envelope in each package, and that both were endorsed with the request that the second cover should not be broken until the Attorney-General should desire me to ascertain the contents. I took them with me into the House at the usual hour of meeting, but no request for the opening of the envelopes was made during the afternoon. The House rose at six o'clock for the usual recess, but did not adjourn, and at eight o'clock I 277 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA resumed the Chair and the House went into Committee of the Whole upon Supply, the discussion being of routine character and not arousing acrimony. An item in con nection with legislation occupied the Committee, and, as is usual on St. Patrick's Day, the members looked for a brief night session, and the Committee reported several resolutions without opposition. After I had resumed the Chair, Mr. Hardy, the Provincial Secretary, presented several reports which were received. At this point Mr. Mowat rose, and, addressing the Chair, requested me to open the envelopes placed in my hands and read to the House the letters they contained. I did so, with some curiosity as to the contents of the letters and the novelty of the procedure, but convinced by the manner of the Attorney-General that the matter was of no cornmon import. The letters were as follows : " Monday Morning, March 17th, 1884. "Mr. Speaker, — The enclosed one thousand dollars was yesterday paid to me, to influence my vote in the Legislative Assembly, by Mr. Wilkinson. I place it in your hands at the earliest opportunity on your return to the city. " I remain, yours truly, " R. McKiM." " House of Assembly, " Toronto, March 17th, 1884, 3 p.m. "Dear Sir, — I hereby enclose you the sum of eight hundred dollars, in one-hundred-dollar bills, handed to me at 2.30 p.m. to-day, and now handed to you by me. It was given me by a man named ' Big Push ' Wilkinson, 278 THE BRIBERY CASE in Room No. 9, Walker House, to influence my vote against the Government during the present session. I made no promises. "Yours faithfully, " Wm. D. Balfour. " Col. Charles Clarke, " Speaker Legislative Assembly, Ontario." In the letter from Mr. McKim were one thoUsand dollars, in ten one-hundred-dollar bills of the Bank of British North America, and in Mr. Balfour's letter eight similar bills. It is needless to say that the written contents of these packages aroused the most profound attention from the members on both sides of the House, and that there appeared to be a common feeling of disgust on the part of those who heard the statement made, and extreme annoyance at the fact that there were any grounds for the charge that members of the Legislature had been tam pered with in the manner stated by Messrs. McKim and Balfour. Leaders of Reformers and Conservatives alike felt that the honor and good name of the Legislative Assembly had been besmirched, that its standing, what ever the result of future action, was lowered, and that the only steps to be taken were such as should fully warrant the most drastic treatment. The scene was a memorable one. Mr. Mowat and Mr. Meredith, the opposing leaders of the House, were pale with suppressed excitement. Mr. Morris, ex-Governor of Manitoba, the lieutenant of the Conservative leader, was shocked by the startling disclosures. There was a sympathetic deter mination, which appeared to be unanimous, that inves tigation should be made and the guilty punished. Little 279 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA could be said, but there was much to be done, and the session was nearing its end. If the charges brought against prominent members of the community were true, and there appeared to be little doubt of that, the House must make a probing inquiry, purge itself of disgrace, and put blame upon the parties really guilty of a great crime. One course only seemed to be oper.'. The House must stand upon its dignity, make its own inquiry into details, and see that no legal quibbles should be per mitted to shield the ring-leaders in the attack upon the probity and honor of the Legislature. After the reading of the letters, the Attorney-General resumed and said that money had been paid for the pur pose of influencing votes in the House, and that this was a high crime and misdemeanor. He then proceeded to read the following statement in the form of a resolution : " That he is credibly informed and believes that divers persons named by him, including Christopher W. Bunting, John A. Wilkinson, Edward Meek, F. S. Kirkland, and one Lynch, have entered into a conspiracy to accomplish the defeat of the Government in this House by corrupt ing members of this House to vote against the Govern ment and Government measures; that the first-named three persons are well-known and active members of the party in this province opposed to this Government; and that the last named two persons are American citizens; that for the purpose of corruptly influencing the votes of members of this House, the said five persons have at divers times during the present session of this Legislature approached several members of this House with money, offers of money, promises of offices in the gift of the Dominion Government, and promises of other personal advantages to such members ; that divers members of this House so approached, being indignant at the criminal 280 THE BRIBERY CASE conduct proposed to them, have deemed it to be the fit ting course on their part and a duty to their constituents and the public, acting herein with the approval and advice of members of the Government, to seem for a time to entertain such approaches, in order to the detec tion, exposure and punishment of the persons guilty of making such corrupt attempts, and have, in pursuance of their duty, from time to time disclosed to members of the Government the approaches from time to time made to them, and the several acts therein of the guilty parties ; that among the members of this House in regard to whom such attempts have been made are Mr. Robert McKim, member for the West Riding of Wellington, Mr. Wm. D. Balfour, member for the South Riding of Essex, and Mr. John F. Dowling, member for the South Riding of Ren frew; that in carrying out the objects of the conspiracy the said Wilkinson, to influence the vote of the said McKim, repeatedly offered him money, and has at length delivered to the said McKim one thousand dollars; that Mr. McKim, immediately on receiving the money, placed it in the hands of Mr. Speaker, to be by him produced to this House; that both the said Wilkinson and the said Bunting undertook to pay to Mr. McKim a further sum of one thousand dollars on a future day; that the said Bunting was a party to the payment of the former sum, and to the promise to pay the latter sum for the corrupt purpose already stated; and that, to secure the same corrupt object, the said Wilkinson and Bunting further offered and undertook that the said McKim should be appointed registrar at Edmonton, in the North-West, at a salary of one thousand dollars a year; that both the said Wilkinson and the said Bunting assured the said McKim that the Dominion Minister of the Interior had pledged to them his word that their said promise of the 281 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA said office would be carried out, and the said Bunting, on his own part, pledged his word to the same effect, that for the same corrupt purpose already mentioned, and to influence the vote of the said Wm. D. Balfour, the said Wilkinson repeatedly offered to pay and did this day deliver to the said Balfour, the sum of eight hundred dollars in cash, and undertook to pay a further sum of seven hundred dollars on a future day ; that for the same purpose the said Kirkland also offered to pay to him the sum of twelve hundred dollars; that immediately on receiving the said sum of eight hundred dollars, [Mr. Balfour placed the same in the hands of Mr. Speaker, to be by him produced to this House, and that further to secure the same purpose, the said Wilkinson undertook that the said Balfour should be appointed by the Domin ion Government to a registrarship at Regina, in the North-West; that the said Wilkinson, for the corrupt purpose already mentioned and to influence the vote of the said John F. Dowling, offered him the sum of two thousand dollars cash, and to pay him a further sum of two thousand dollars at a future period; that the sum so offered to be paid down was exhibited by him to the said Wilkinson, and that there is reason to believe that other corrupt offers were made by the said conspirators to and rejected by other members of this House, and he moves as follows : That the charges read and matters re ferred to and set forth in said statement of the informa tion and belief of the Attorney-General be forthwith referred to the Standing Committee on Privileges and Elections, with instructions to inquire and report thereon and with power to send for and examine all necessary persons and papers in or concerning the premises." Mr. Meredith addressed the House, and declared that this was as great a surprise to him as it had been to any 282 THE BRIBERY CASE member of his side of the House, and he fully concurred in the observations of the Attorney-General as to the startling character of the statements that he had made and the necessity of a faithful and full investigation before the proper committee. He protested that no evi dence had been adduced warranting the use of Mr. Bunt ing's name, and condemned the carrying on of prolonged negotiations with the alleged bribers. Mr. Morris spoke briefly along similar lines. Perhaps the most exciting incident in a group of incidents was the speech delivered by Hon. C F. Fraser, in which Hl spoke of all implicated in this affair as " a brawling brood of bribers." Those who saw his outstretched arm and pointed finger, and heard the thrilling tone which he used when delivering those since famous words, cannot readily forget one of the most remarkable diatribes war ranted by an occasion. The Commissioner was inspired by a conviction of the truthfulness of the charges made and a determination to drag the accused into a court of justice. He may have been more or less vin dictive, may have been animated to some extent at least by the partisan spirit, which excites in all poli ticians a measure of personal bitterness, and doubt less felt a not unnatural anxiety to make all possible political capital out of the occurrences. So long as law-makers are mere men this feeling will exist, and much as we may deprecate it, mankind in general will entertain and tolerate its manifestation. Defend ing the course of the gentlemen who had caught the corruptionists, and had been already assailed therefor, he said: His honorable friend from East Toronto (Mr. Morris) had only words of reproach for those gentle men, who deserved at the hands of the House as a whole, and at the hands of the province at large, credit and honor and reputation for having brought this villainy 283 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA home. ( Cheers. ) His honorable friend said that it was a grave and serious thing that members of the Government should have allowed this matter to go on, but he knew, and the House knew, that if any one on his (Eraser's) side of the House had risen to make such a charge, with out having evidence in his possession, he would have been laughed and sneered at for making charges without foundation. (Cheers.) It was necessary for public purity, and in order to clear the political sky, that such steps should be taken, that when the matter came before the House they should be able to pl^ce, beyond peradventure, the conviction of these men. Then, steadily pointing his finger across the House, in withering tones he said : .They have snared this brawling brood of bribers that had been hatched under the eaves of the Mail building during the session. (Loud and pro longed applause.) He told his friends from South Essex and North Wellington that they would get, as they had deserved to get, credit and honor from the people of this Dominion from one end of it to the other. (Cheers.) He told his friend from East Toronto, as he had told his friend from North Wellington, that there was no dishonor in bringing home guilt where guilt lay. (Cheers. ) There was no dishonor in making conviction sure; there was no dishonor in putting one's self in the breach, and he said if there were two men in the House who deserved the esteem and credit of every honest man on both sides of the House, they were the members for South Essex and North Wellington. The Standing Committee on Privileges and Elections offered the most likely method of quickly getting at the facts, and the case was ordered to be submitted to them. This body consisted of the following members: The Attorney-General and Messrs. Badgerow, Ballantyne, Blezard, Brereton, Broder, Cascaden, Dryden, Erma- 284 THE BRIBERY CASE tinger, Ferris, Fraser, French, Graham, Gray, Hagar, Harcourt, Hart, Lauder, Mclntyre, McKenzie, McMahon, Meredith, Merrick, Metcalf, Monk, Morin, Morris, Murray, Neelon, Rayside, Roe, Ross, Sills, Snyder and White — 35. The Committee, with Mr. Harcourt as chairman, held its first meeting next morning, and Messrs. John F. Dowling and Wm. D. Balfour, both members of the Assembly, without being sworn, gave statements as to the offer made to them o.f money and promises of office by certain persons named by them, and on condition that they should vote against the Government of which Mr. Mowat was Premier. The Committee sat on March 19th, 20th, 2 1 St, 22nd and 24th, and on the 24th formally reported progress. In its third report, this Committee recommended the appointment of a Commission to in quire into and investigate the charges, and a motion of an humble address to His Honor the Lieutenant-Gov ernor was carried. Such Commissioners were to be three judges, one of whom at least was to be a judge of the Supreme Court of Judicature of Ontario. The Committee took this action because, during the few remaining days of the session, it would be impos sible to continue and conclude the investigation of the matters referred to it, and it therefore asked to be dis charged from any present further action or proceeding in the premises. The House having concurred in this report and passed the Address, the Commissioners to be appointed were vested with all the powers contained or given in or by Chapter XVII. of the Revised Statutes of Ontario, intituled "An Act respecting In quiries," or in or by any Act amending the same. A commission was issued to Mr. Justice Proudfoot. Mr. Judge Scott, of the County of Peel, Brampton, and Mr. Judge Senkler, ol the County of Lincoln, St. 28s SIXTY lYEARS IN UPPER CANADA Catharines, under Order of Council, dated 12th May, 1884, which, after reciting the charges of attempt at corrupt infiuence upon certain members of the Legisla ture of Ontario, therein named, went on to confer the usual powers upon commissioners, and declared that the " Election Law Amendment Act of 1884 " was to be deemed to apply to any attempts to corrupt the success ful candidates at elections of the Legislative Assembly, whether such attempts were made before or subsequent to the passing of the said Election Law. The Commission opened its inquiry in Toronto on July 14th, 1884, and dated its Report on ioth January, 1885. Justice Proudfoot was elected chairman, and the conduct of the inquiry was committed by the Attorney-General to S. H. Blake, Esq., Q.C. Wm. Johnston, Esq., barrister, appeared for the Crown; Mr. Edward Meek appeared on his own behalf, and Mr. Thomas Caswell for Frank S. Kirkland. ; The Report states that at the meeting of the 14th day of July, W R. Meredith, Esq., M.P.P., appeared as a member of the Assembly, and requested liberty to cross- examine the witnesses. The Commissioners declined to permit him to do so in that capacity, but expressed their readiness to hear him if he chose to appear for any of the parties interested, or to formulate a charge against anyone, for more thoroughly probing the matter. On the 2nd September, W. R. Meredith, Esq., pre ferred a charge against certain members of the Govern ment in the following terms : " That members of the Government, Messrs. Fraser, Pardee, Hardy, and Mr. Mowat, knowing that attempts were being made to corrupt members of the House, induced members of the House to approach the persons who are said to have been engaged in this work, for the purpose of inducing them to make cor- 286 THE BRIBERY CASE rupt offers, and to endeavor to entrap others not engaged in the matter into the same corrupt acts." Upon the 3rd of October, on the application of Hon. Mr. Fraser, the Commissioners ordered the names of the persons to be given whom the members of the Gov ernment had colluded with others to endeavor to entrap. On the next day the particulars were given as follows : " The following are the particulars, so far as known, of the persons referred to in Mr. Meredith's charge, as persons approached by members of the House, at the instance of members of the Government referred to in the said charge : John A. Wilkinson, Edward Meek, Christopher W. Bunting and F. A. Kirkland. The Commissioners closed their sittings for taking evidence and hearing the arguments of counsel on the 13th of October. Those sittings were public and open, and accommodation was provided for reporters of the public press. The Commissioners, in transmitting the evidence taken by them, numbered the Report Irom i to 42. These numbers are appended to the paragraphs copied in the Report, which was signed by Judge Proudfoot, Chairman, and Judge E. A. Senkler. The following is the Special Report made by Judge Scott: " Osgoode Hall, " Toronto, Sth January, 1885. " I concur in reporting proceedings and evidence ; would prefer a distinct statement as to the persons against whom evidence may be read, and respectfully decline giving an opinion or finding as to offences proved. " (Signed) A. F. Scott, " Commissioner. " Brampton, Sth Jan., 1885. 287 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA The following numbered paragraphs are taken from the Report of a majority of the Commissioners : 25. An attempt was made by Mr. Meek to impeach the credibility of two of the witnesses, Robert McKim and John Cascaden, and many witnesses were examined against them and for them. The Commissioners con sider that the credibility of Messrs. McKim and Cas caden was not successfully attacked. 27. The Commissioners find that during the debate on the Address at the last session of the House of Assembly, a debate that lasted from the opening of the House on the 23rd of January till the 6th of February, an en deavor was made by John A. Wilkinson, Edwin Meek and Christopher W. Bunting, acting in concert, to form a coalition Government, and for that purpose to induce members of the House, supporters of the Government, to vote against them on the Address. 28. In pursuance of this scheme, negotiations were entered into by Wilkinson, Meek, and Bunting with Robert McKim, and by Meek with Cascaden, and offers were made to them of money, and of offices in the North- West Territory, to induce them to vote against the Government. 29. The Commissioners only mention those to whom corrupt offers were made to induce them to vote against the Government by argument. F. A. Kirkland was also endeavoring at this time to influence the votes of mem bers for his own purposes, but not apparently in con junction with the others. 30. After the vote on the Address had sustained the Government, their efforts ceased until towards the end of the session, when they were renewed, not only as to Mr. McKim, but also as to Messrs. Dowling, Balfour and Lyon. 288 THE BRIBERY CASE ! 31. These renewed attempts were made by Kirkland, in conjunction with Wilkinson, Meek and Bunting, and by a person who passed by the name of Lynch, but whose true name was Stimson. 32. Kirkland made advances to Balfour, represent ing that Wilkinson and Bunting were desirous of know ing what he would take to vote against the Government. Wilkinson offered Balfour anything he might state, in the way of a shrievalty or registrarship in the North- West, or advertising for his paper from the depart ments, and represented Bunting as working with him in the matter. Wilkinson said he could pay him $1,000 or $1,200 down as a guarantee of the office, and after the vote he would give, say, $1,000; that Balfour would get any office he might decide upon. Kirkland also offered Balfour to pay him $1,000 or $1,200 to speak against the Government, and on the 17th of March Wilkinson gave Balfour $800, and promised to give him $700 after a vote was taken on a resolution to be moved by the Opposition. 33. Negotiations had alsoi been renewed with McKim and $1,000 were given to him on the i6th of March by Wilkinson, after Stimson alias Lynch, had, on the pre vious day endeavored to get McKim to bet on Dowling's vote. 36. Corrupt offers were made also to Dowling by Wilkinson, who wanted him to vote against the Govern ment. He was to get $2,000, and, after he resigned his seat, $2,000, or $3,000 if he did not interfere against the candidate who should run. Wilkinson wanted him to see Bunting to arrange to have the protest withdrawn. Dowling saw Bunting, who said if he would assist in the formation of a coalition, and vote against the Govern ment, and resign his seat, they would recoup him his 19 289 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA election expenses, and they could afford to give him $2,000 or $3,000. Wilkinson took Dowling to Stimson, alias Lynch, who wanted to bet $2,000 that he would not vote against the Mowat administration, and on the 15th of March, Wilkinson and Kirkland in company endeavored to induce Dowling to vote against the Government. 38. In regard to the charge made by Mr. Meredith against Messrs. Fraser, Pardee, Hardy and Mowat, the Commissioners are of opinion that the evidence wholly fails to establish it. All the witnesses who speak on the subject, with one exception, show that the advice of these members of the Government to the persons to whom offers were made, was to be passive, to see how far the persons making offers would go. That is the evidence of these members of the Government themselves; it is the evidence also of the persons to whom they gave the advice. The only conflicting evidence is that of the witness Vicars, who says he heard Hardy say to Fraser, " If your little scheme with Balfour works we will fix them." This was distinctly denied both by Hardy and Fraser. The Commissioners think that Vicars was either under a mistake as to the persons who were speaking together, or that he was telling an untruth. They were not favorably impressed with the manner in which Vicars gave his evidence and do not credit his testimony. 40. The evidence does not show that the money given to McKim and Balfour came from any other source than Wilkinson or Stimson. 41. Nor does there appear to be any reason for sup posing that any Conservative members of the House of Assembly attempted to use improper means to induce the members of the House to change their votes. 290 THE BRIBERY CASE 42. The Commissioners have arrived at the foregoing conclusions, after a careful consideration of the evi dence, and having had the advantage of hearing able arguments by the counsel who appeared before them. This Report, as I have said, was concurred in by Justice Proudfoot and Judge Senkler, and can be found in full, with the evidence and all the documents produced before the Commission, in the sessional papers of the Legislative Assembly, Vol. 17, Part 3, 1885, while the proceedings of the House in connection with the dis closures arid the preliminary investigation before the Committee on Privileges and Elections are recorded in the Journals for 1884. The Legislature took no action upon the Report of the Commissioners, as the law was felt to be uncertain and defective, but action was brought before the Police Magistrate of Toronto, who committed the four persons named as conspirators, Messrs. Bunting, Kirkland, Meek and Wilkinson, for trial at the Assizes for the County of York. A true bill was found by the Grand Jury, and much evidence taken similar in character to that adduced before the Com missioners. The result, however, was an acquittal, the judge. Sir Adam Wilson, charging strongly in that direction. Leaving the court one day, I found myself walking beside the man Kirkland, and we fell into conversation. He seemed very much surprised at the fuss made over such a small matter as attempting to buy a few legislators. It was, he said, a usual preliminary to securing charters and timber grants from other Legislatures, and he had no interest in the fortunes of political parties in Ontario. The end to be served in his case, he told me, was a purely personal one. 291 CHAPTER XXII. SIXTH, SEVENTH AND EIGHTH LEGISLATURES. House opened ioth February, 1887 — Mr. Speaker Baxter — Boun daries still in dispute — Mr. Guthrie and Mr. Evanturel on the Address — Municipal Franchise for Widows and Unmarried Women — Jubilee Year — Resolution in favor of Home Rule for Ireland — Session of 1888 — Judgment of Superior Court re Crown Lands— Mr. Whitney in the House — Other new members — Seventh Legislature- — ^Mr. Ballantyne, Speaker — Deposits of nickel — Messrs. Harcourt and Dryden in the Ministry — Purchase of supplies by tender — More money for Parliament buildings — Length of sessions increasing — Illness of Sir A Campbell in 1892 — Judge Hagarty opens House — Death of Lieutenant-Governor Campbell — Opening of Legislature in new Parliament buildings by Lieutenant- Governor Kirkpatrick and Hon. Thos. Ballantyne, 4th April, 1893 — From 1893 to the close of the Mowat Administration. The House met on the ioth of February, 1887, when Hon. J. B. Robinson delivered the opening speech, Jacob Baxter, Esq., having been unanimously elected Speaker. Mr. Baxter was what is known as a charter member — one of the old guard from the first Legislature. From his large experience, his natural dignity and knowledge of parliamentary law, he was well fitted to occupy the position to which he was now called. His Honor was still unable to announce an)' progress 292 SIXTH, SEVENTH AND EIGHTH LEGISLATURES . i towards a final settlement, of the boundaries of the pro vince, the Dominion Government having neglected to recognize the rights of Ontario, as confirmed by the Imperial Privy Council. This had become a burning question, and no language could be regarded as too strong which rightly stigmatized the fatuous conduct of the Dominion authorities. But the Government, know ing the folly of rash proceedings, still hoped for orderly and peaceful settlement of a matter so important, and while firmly and strenuously insisting upon full recog nition of Ontario's rights, nevertheless did not unwisely depart from the calm dignity of official language in urg ing an early and final disposal of the matter. The Address pointed further to the fact that the despatches of 1884 from His Honor the Lieut.-Governor of Ontario, bearing on the subject of the northern boundary of Ontario, still, in 1887, remained unanswered. The reply was moved by Mr. Guthrie and seconded by Mr. Evanturel. Other subjects were alluded to, but were superseded in importance by this question of the limits of the pro vince. Until that point was definitely decided, it neces sarily continued to be of first concern, for it involved lands, timber, minerals, railway routes, every source of provincial wealth ; and the bold declaration that Ontario had but little and doubtful claim to these valuable assets naturally aroused the indignation of the thinking people of the whole province. At an early period in the session that motion which had now become an annual one was planted in the hot bed of notices of motion. From year to year it varied, and, growing more modest, looked for less, in the hope that the good times coming would speedily give more. The vote was asked in behalf of widows and unmarried 293 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA females with taxable property, who sought a share in the franchise. The demand seemed such an unreasonable one that the motion for a second reading was lost. The vote was a large one, there being 55 nays to 19 yeas. This was " Jubilee " year, and the House prepared, through a select committee, an elaborate address allud ing to the principal events of Her Majesty's reign, writ ten in well-selected terms, and giving at a glance a bird's- eye view of British achievements during the fifty years of her occupation of the throne. It is almost needless to say that it was adopted by the unanimous concurrence of the House, amidst the rousing and continued cheers of the representatives of the people. The Irish question found its way to the House, as it did to every deliberative body in the British Dominions enjoying representative home rule, and was fully and fairly discussed. The last of the series of resolutions given here, containing the gist of the whole address, was carried by a large majority of the representatives : Resolved : That we desire to place on record our pro found sympathy with the efforts made to find a remedy for miseries and evils long endured, and to express our earnest hope that such a measure of local self-govern ment may soon be granted as, while preserving the integrity of the Empire, and all the just rights of the minority, may at the same time be satisfactory to the Irish people, and permanently remove discontent, and, so far as may still be possible, its causes. It was resolved, too, that copies of these resolutions be forthwith communicated, by Mr. Speaker, to the Right Honorable William Ewart Gladstone, M.P., and to Charles Stuart Parnell, Esq., M.P. The resolution was carried by a vote of 59 yeas to 28 nays. 294 SIXTH, SEVENTH AND EIGHTH LEGISLATURES On the 23rd of April the House was prorogued after assent had been given to ninety-nine acts. The House reassembled on the 25 th of January, 1888, the Speech being read by Sir Alexander Campbell, who had succeeded the Hon. J. B. Robinson. He announced that the Supreme Court of Canada had affirmed the judgment of the High Court of Appeal in favor of the provincial claim to Crown lands, to which the so-called Indian title had not been extinguished until after Con federation. The Federal Government had recently intimated to him its intentions of concurring in the steps necessary to obtain from the Imperial Parliament an act confirm ing the western boundary of the provinces. Negotia tions had also commenced respecting the northern boundary, so far as the same has not already been determined. , University extension had been advanced, and a site had been procured for Upper Canada College. Improvements were being effected in Hamilton Asylum, rooms for 150 additional patients having been brought into use. The judges upon controverted elections and petitions sent in their reports, declaring the elections of Mr. W. Willoughby for East Northumberland, and of Theodore J. Chamberlain for Dundas, void. James Clancy, Esq., for West Kent, was confirmed in his seat. At subsequent elections Mr. J. P. Whitney was elected for Dlindas and Mr. Richard Clarke for East Northumberland. J. P. Whitney, Esq., defeated Mr. Chamberlain, an old antagonist, in 1888, and has since been re-elected at every general election. At the time of his election he was a comparatively new man in politics, although he had been previously in a contest with Mr. T. J. Chamberlain. 295 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA He at once took an interest in the business of the Legisla ture. He spoke occasionally, and created a favorable im pression upon party friends, and a belief in ministerial ranks that here was a man to be reckoned with. Mr. Meredith was then the Leader of the Opposition, and regarded his new follower as one not only likely to win his spurs, but to take a prominent part in the work of the House. He gradually found his way to the front benches, although he never shoved himself to the van unless hard knocks were to be expected. He had one hobby, if you like to so term it, in his merciless attacks upon the attempts at bribery upon both sides, which were revealed in every election court. When the retirement of William Meredith left the Conservative party practically without a leader, Mr. Marter assumed the position reluctantly, and only after great pressure, but soon relinquished it, feeling that he could not deal with the temperance question as he would like to do and retain a leadership of average Conser vatives or Reformers. Ill-health precipitated what was inevitable, and he made way in the hope that a stronger man could be found to do the work for which he felt incapable. Mr. Whitney was selected, and is yet under trial. He had able predecessors, and there were those who predicted his early retirement from office, but he gradually led the country and his opponents to perceive that no man to the left of the Speaker had exhibited more tact, resource and knowledge of public affairs. Some regarded him as distinguished by an unfinished style as an orator, but it was soon seen that it was of the quality which tells, and that he could use the scalping- knife with deft and skilful hand, or the sledge-hammer with thundering crash, as he desired, and when grown accustomed, as he speedily did, to the ins and outs of 296 SIXTH, SEVENTH AND EIGHTH LEGISLATURES parliamentary debate, he had no reason to fear any rival or to quail before the attack or rejoinder of the leading men of the Mowat regime. To speak at greater length of one still on the political stage would be to be tempted into a path which I do not care to follow. 'Other members who first appeared in the House about this time were : Angus McKay, Esq., M.D., who was member for South Oxford, and held the constituency for several years. First elected to the Legislature meeting on the ioth of February, 1887, he was returned in 1891, 1895 and 1898. A medical gentleman with largepractice, he was per sonally highly popular, but local differences existed even in South Oxford, and he was finally defeated. He acted for some years as the Reform " whip " of the House, and was presented with a handsome silver service by his fellow-members. He was an attractive speaker, and took part in a debate occasionally, but he had more onerous duties and closely attended to them. When he did address the House it was for the purpose of gaining time, probably before a division. As a rival whip he was confronted by G. W. Monk, Esq., or Dr. Willoughby, and the intercourse of these was as pleasing as could well be conceived as existing between men of such antagonistic views. Donald Guthrie, Esq., Q.C, was elected member for South Wellington in the Local Legislature in 1886 and again in 1900. He had previously represented his con stituency in the Commons. Mr. Guthrie was a logical advocate of Liberalism, and was otherwise an earnest and attractive speaker, whose word had great weight. Un fortunately he suffered from deafness, which seriously interfered with his efficiency. But for that fact he would have been invited to a seat in the Cabinet. 297 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA ¦ Hon. Ernest Henry Bronson, Ottawa, was made a member of the Executive Council, without portfolio, on the 30th September, 1890, and was a pronounced Liberal, of fiscal ability, and was largely engaged in lumbering. He was an American by birth, but perfectly free from the extreme views which distinguished many of his com patriots. Of course, he had become a British subject before he took his seat in the Local Assembly. He was a concise and logical speaker, and was always listened to with attention when he addressed the House. James R. Stratton, Esq., was elected member for West Peterborough in 1886, and sat in the House from that date through the Legislatures of 1891, 1895, 1898 and 1903. His rise in the Legislature was rapid, and he was one of its most industrious members. As a speaker he was fluent, and wisely prepared himself thoroughly to meet any possible attack upon his depart ment or any of the private bill legislation which he pro moted at every session before he became a busy mem ber of the Government, when he was elevated to the office of Provincial Secretary in 1899. O" a Municipal Committee he was eminently in the lead, while in know ledge of the subject of municipal assessment he was one of the strongest men in the Legislature. From his first entrance to the House he was marked by an attempt at practical legislation, and prided himself upon the fact that he had a clear conception of the advantages arising from co-operation, and had a taste for its study, and a broad view as to its possibilities. His home — for such Peter borough may be termed — illustrates his ideas of progress, and that union of small means which ultimately tends to bring about great results. He has withdrawn for the time from provincial politics, but he cannot keep out of the turmoil — and vicissitudes, if you will — of party 298 SIXTH, SEVENTH AND EIGHTH LEGISLATURES life, organization and action, and if health is spared to him he will yet come again to the front in his public career. Hon. F. E. A. Evanturel, for many years member for Prescott, occupied a seat in the Legislature after the general elections in 1887, 1891, 1895, 1898, 1902, but was defeated in that of 1905. He had large influence with the many electors of French-Canadian origin resi dent in the eastern and northern constituencies of the province, and, had the Ross Cabinet been sustained upon its last appeal to the people, might have been selected as a member of the Administration. He speaks well in English and eloquently in French, and has the suavity of his compatriots. Robert Ferguson, Esq., entered the Legislature in 1887, and represented East Kent as a Reformer until after the close of the century. He was always at his post, faithfully supporting Reform measures, and never shirked a vote or deserted a principle. James Conmee, Esq., North Algoma, first took his seat in the Legislature on 28th of January, 1886, and at the general election later in the same year he was again returned. He was one of the most remarkable men taking a place in that Assembly. Possessing a com bination of physical and intellectual strength, he is a man of great force of character, of unusual acuteness, of good judgment, and of unfailing courage. He might quail before a lion, but the animal must be of more than ordinary strength and ferocity, and the man who could affright the member for Algoma never put in an appear ance in the Ontario Legislature. Mr. Conmee's course in the Legislature was marked by a thorough devotion to the interests of his constituents, and this interest he no doubt exhibits in the wider sphere of the House of 299 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA Commons. As a young man Mr. Conmee was of an adventurous spirit, and served during the American Civil War in the Sth New York Cavalry, under General Custer. Edward Frederick Clarke, Esq., was elected to represent West Toronto in 1887, and again in 1891. He was a consistent Conservative, and for some time held high positions in the Orange order. He was never dis agreeably pugnacious, but firmly maintained such views as he held. He was affable in manner and clear in the expression of his views. A model politician, he re spected his opponents, and, as a rule, those thinking otherwise than with him had a high opinion of his in tentions. He was a pleasant speaker and attentive to the little courtesies which smooth every man's path. He was ordinarily cool, and equal to the exigencies of debate, though he never needlessly flayed an opponent. Mr. Clarke was afterwards one of Toronto's representatives at Ottawa. Few men of his day had more friends in his home city, and his comparatively early death was greatly regretted. James Rayside, Esq., was one of the Reform mem bers of the House. He represented Glengarry in 1887, after the seat had been filled for some years by Donald McMaster, Esq., of Montreal. Mr. Rayside had been engaged largely in lumbering, and being a man of ideas and possessed of a popular manner, could handle an elector as easily as a public question. He had many friends and no enemy. After a general election, 5th of June, 1890, the House met on the i ith of February, 1891. His Honor the Lieut.- Governor, Sir Alexander Campbell, went through the form of discovering that the House had no Speaker, and declared it impossible that he should seriously address 300 SIXTH, SEVENTH AND EIGHTH LEGISLATURES himself to it until this deficiency had been supplied. He would go away to-day and come back to-morrow. When to-morrow and three o'clock arrived, the vacancy had been filled, and very well filled, by the ap pointment of Thomas Ballantyne, Esq., member for the South Riding of Perth. This gentleman was acceptable to His 'Honor, who proceeded to declare the causes of his summoning the present Legislature, and said he had pleasure in announcing that a considerable advance had been made towards the settlement of long-pending dif ferences between the Dominion and the province, and that small matters still undecided were likely to be fully adjusted during the present year. In Quebec, however, the Government retained its old attitude toward the Land Improvement "Fund, and it was recommended that the payment to municipalities from this fund, chargeable against Ontario, should no longer be delayed. The growing interest in scientific agriculture was noticed with pleasure, and the good work of the Provin cial Board of Health and of local boards working in unison was referred to. The dissemination of " sanitary literature " was declared to be one of the useful means of fighting the spread of disease. The discovery of immense and valuable deposits of nickel would require some changes in the mining laws, and the withdrawal from sale and location of some por tions of Algoma and Nipissing. Commissions which had inquired into the subjects of prison reform and the fish and game laws would have reports ready for consideration before the close of the session. Two new ministers were present in the House, Hon. Richard Harcourt, as Treasurer, and Hon. John Dryden, 301 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA as Minister of Agriculture. There were as many as eighteen reports of judges who had held trials of con troverted elections, many of those whose elections had been protested being confirmed in their seats. The Address in reply to the Speech was moved by Joseph Tait, and seconded by J. T. Garrow. When the estimates came up for consideration there was the annual fight over the matter of the purchase, without tender, of suppHes for institutions. Inquiries into this subject have been frequent, and the result has been a confirmation of the present method of buying all articles wisely pur chasable in that way by tender, such as flour, coal, and supplies in large and determinable quantities. Many things of irregular or only occasional demand can be bought to better advantage in the open market. The keen commercial rivalry existing to-day makes over charging improbable, and under either method it is safe to assert that every Government will make sure that party friends will have a preference, provided that quality and price are equal. It is sheer hypocrisy to say that any other course is pursued by any Government under representative institutions. Ontario, in this respect, is neither better nor worse than its neighbors, and as yet no great scandal has been dragged from the coal-hole or elsewhere, establishing dishonesty on the part of grocers, dry goods men or others selling goods to the Govern ment. During this session a further sum of one hundred and fifty thousand dollars was voted for the erection of new Parliament Buildings, making the total sum voted for such purposes twelve hundred thousand dollars. One hundred and thirteen acts were given the Royal assent, when the House was prorogued on May 4th, the latest date at which prorogation had taken place 302 SIXTH, SEVENTH AND EIGHTH LEGISLATURES since Confederation. This was also the longest session since the establishment of the Legislature, lacking only one week of three months. The previous session in 1890 had been longer than any of those preceding it. This increasing length of the session was due in a cou siderable degree to the greater amount of private bill legislation, which formed almost one-half of the work of the session of 1891. A member of this Legislature who afterwards attained a leading position, was Hon. Elihu Davis, who sat for North York from 1891 to the close of the Ross regime. He was appointed Provincial Secretary, 28th of August, 1896, and in October, 1899, became Com missioner of Crown Lands. His addresses to the House were carefully prepared, full of facts, strengthened with strong arguments, which were put so as to impress the listener with the conviction that he thoroughly under stood his subject, and was not attempting to speak over the heads of his audience. He was a careful depart mental head, was on good terms with his staff, and fully alive to the importance of the Crown Lands income, and the value of our immense mining properties. Hon. j. T. Garrow, Esq., was a man of uncommon parts, and took his seat for West Huron, nth of Febru ary, 1891, was re-elected in 1895, and afterwards ascended the bench. He was called to the Cabinet with out portfolio, holding that position for a brief period. His elevation to the bench was generally approved. Mr. Garrow is a close reasoner, but better fitted for a legal administrator than a political partisan. W. H. Biggar, Esq., who sat for West Plastings in 1 89 1 and 1895, was an energetic and successful com mitteeman, especially on the Private Bills Committee, where he had more influence than any other man 303 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA sent from Belleville. Although a legal gentleman, he was not given to making long speeches. He is now solicitor for the Grand Trunk, and has removed from Belleville to Montreal. The House was again called together for nth of February, 1892, when, because of the inability through sickness of His Honor Sir A. Campbell to open the ses sion, the Honorable John Hawkins Hagarty, Chief Jus tice of the province, was appointed to be administrator of the Government, and opened the House in the usual form. The Speech referred to the lamented death of one of the direct heirs to the British throne, the Duke of Clar ence, and informed the House that gracious messages of acknowledgment had been received in reply to the condolences sent by the Lieut.-Governor. The activity of the Department of Agriculture was being appreciated, and was bringing about increased interest and advance in all departments of husbandry. The reveriue from Woods and Forests had been larger than anticipated, despite a decreased output. Fires had been very troublesome in the forest regions because of the drought, but the system of fire-ranging* had prevented them from assuming disastrous propor tions, and the injured timber had been sold to good advantage. The new Parliament Buildings were nearing comple tion, and it was hoped that the next session might be held there. The University Buildings, damaged by fire two years previous, were almost restored, and the new Upper Can ada College Building was so much appreciated that more students asked for admission than could be accommo dated. 3°4 SIXTH, SEVENTH AND EIGHTH LEGISLATURES Lieut.-Col. Gillmor, Clerk of the Assembly from Con federation to the end of 1891, when he died after a brief illness, was succeeded by the writer, who held the office until 1st of January, 1907, and was succeeded by A. H. Sydere, Esq., for many years Clerk Assistant, and highly qualified for his present position. One of my first duties as Clerk of the House was to administer the oath to James Kirkwood, Esq., my suc cessor in the representation of East Wellington, who had been elected in November, 1891. On the 1st of March, 1892, the House received a return of the election of Hon. W. Harty, as member for Kingston. Hon. William Harty succeeded Hon. Christopher F. Fraser as Commissioner of Public Works in the Mowat Administration. Eminently practical and fully acquainted >with the control of a large business, where constructive knowledge was necessary, he was well fitted to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of his eminent predecessor. Mr. Harty was familiar, too, with the labor questions of his day, and was in touch with the movements of the labor party in the United States, as well as in the Dominion, and especially in the prov ince of Ontario. In manner he was democratically approachable, felt that he held office through, by, and for the people, and that the province and Dominion were on the threshold of great changes, which would materially advance the progress of the whole community. Mr. Harty found the cares of office wearing, and withdrew from the Government and the Legislature. He was afterwards elected to represent Kingston in the Dominion House. On the 24th of March, 1892, an important step was 305 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA taken when resolutions were introduced respecting succession duties. The bounty on wolves was considered in Committee, and it was determined that it should be increased from $6 to $io upon each wolf killed in accordance with regu lations. The wolf, it is said, still holds its own, and at the present time the payments on account of bounties threaten to exceed the appropriation for that purpose., A resolution was passed to enable the University of Toronto to raise the sum of $250,000, to be a first charge upon the permanent funds of the University, at the rate of $5 to the pound for principal. The order for a second reading of the bill to provide for the admission of women to the study and practice of the law elicited an amendment from Mr. Meredith, seconded by Mr. Clancy, that the bill be read six months hence. This was lost on a division of 40 to 41, and tl^e second reading was carried. Resolutions providing for additional railway aid were brought down and received. A bill for the protection of bees was carried on a vote of 52 yeas to 27 nays. Amendments were moved but voted down. Judge 'Hagarty again acted as administrator at the close of the session, after assenting to one hundred and eight acts. Before doing so, he read the usual Speech, and took opportunity to announce the fact that this was the last session of the Legislative Assembly in the old Parliament Buildings, and congratulated the House on the liberal grant made for a proper representation of the province at the World's Fair, to be held in Chicago in the following year. Lieut.-Governor Campbell did not recover from the serious illness which afflicted him during the session 306 SIXTH, SEVENTH AND EIGHTH LEGISLATURES of 1892, but died at Government House in May of that year. His successor was Honorable George Airey Kirk patrick, who had the honor of opening the first session held in the new buildings in Queen's Park. This event in the history of the Legislature took place on the 4th day of April, 1893, and the interest and attendance which it called forth made it a memorable occasion. Hon. Thomas Ballantyne, of Stratford, who had the honor of being the first Speaker to preside over the deliberations of the Assembly in its new quarters, as he was the last to officiate in the historic buildings now obliterated, had been a member of the House for South Perth continuously from 1875. For years he had been a warm supporter of Reform principles, but as Speaker partisan feeling never entered into his decisions, which were always arrived at with caution. Since the close of the Parliament of 1890, he has not taken the same deep interest in public life as in more early years, and it is largely owing to this fact that Perth has been somewhat erratic in its political course. While taking a very earnest and unselfish part in the promotion of public affairs, local and general, Mr. Ballantyne has been specially identified with the progress of the dairy in dustry, in connection with which his name is as familiarly known in Great Britain as in Canada. His generosity, hospitality, and valuable advice are highly appreciated in Perth, but even more widely valued outside of the county. He never spared himself or his means when by fair use of both he could advance Reform principles, and he has been kept out of continued activity only by failing health, which almost inevitably falls to the share of him who, for many years, has done two men's work. Mr. Ballantyne is an excellent conversationist, speaking as aptly in a public assembly as when at his fireside, and 307 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA possesses an excellent repertory of political and general information. During the recess. Nelson Gordon Bigelow, Esq., had been elected in room of H. E. Clarke, Esq., whose tragic death in the House has been noted. Mr. Bigelow did not live to take his place in the Assembly. Another election had been held since his death, and the successful candidate was George Sterling Ryerson, Esq., M.D., who was for some time a useful and industrious repre sentative of Toronto's interests. The Lieut.-Governor referred to the fact that he had the honor not only of opening the first session in the new Parliament Buildings, but that he was presiding over the Legislative work of a new century, this being the first year of the second century of the existence of representative government in Canada. He rejoiced in believing that under our present relations with the Empire we could enjoy every privilege necessary to the fullest exercise of self-government. He alluded to several measures and reports which would be laid before them, and stated that a bill con solidating the various Acts respecting the University of Toronto, the Registry Acts, a bill respecting Labor Liens, and another dealing with Voters' Lists in cities, would be offered for their consideration. The Address in reply was disposed of without delay, and was moved by Mr. Allan, seconded by Mr. Mc- Kechnie. Numerous petitions were presented this session, pray ing that provision might be made for taking a direct vote of the electors of Ontario upon the question of im portation, manufacture, and sale of intoxicating liquors. Mr. E. F. Clarke (Toronto) moved that the representa tion of Toronto, as it now exists, is unfair and unjust, 308 SIXTH, SEVENTH AND EIGHTH LEGISLATURES and that there is no reason for maintaining the anomalous, exceptional, and unfair methods of electing representa tives for the said electoral district. Mr. Davis moved a long amendment, declaring against the success of the experiment of minority representation existent in Toronto, and admitting that it ought to be abolished. Mr. Tait (Toronto) moved in amendment to the amendment the additional provision that the city is entitled to greater representation because of increase in population. On May 20th the debate was renewed, and Mr. Tait's amendment to the amendment was carried by a vote of 49 yeas to 29 nays. The amended amendment and the amended main motion were carried on the same division, the votes being strictly Conservative on the part of the nays. Mr. Waters, not for a moment dismayed in his crusade for women's rights, resumed the debate on the second reading of Bill 82 to enable women to vote for members of the Legislative Assembly. An amendment declaring in effect that the results of such legislation had not been sufficiently considered, and that it was inex pedient to emulate the State of Wyoming, and moving the six months' hoist, was introduced and carried by a vote of 57 to 16. Mr. Waters, representative of North Middlesex, was one of those plucky men who never know when they are defeated, and who persist in a certain course when it is evident to all the rest of thinking mankind that they cannot carry their ideas into practical operation. He was a clear-headed municipal man, and his opinions in general were valuable and often distinctly novel. He was in the Legislature for several sessions, and was 309 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA missed when he deemed it advisable to accept an official position in Middlesex. The proposition embodied in Bill 71, " for the pre vention of cruelty to and better protection of children," was moved by Mr. Gibson, Provincial Secretary, and opposed by Mr. Meredith, who was strongly pronounced on the ground that a paid provincial officer for the enforcement of the law was an unnecessary expenditure, and asked that this feature of the bill be removed. The House differed from the hon. member, and by a vote of 53 to 29 disposed of his amendment. Mr. Whitney took exception to a section of the bill, but his amendment was lost by a vote of 62 to 22. On 22nd May, 1893, Bill 156, to enable the electors of the province to pronounce upon the desirability of prohibiting the importation, manufacture, and sale, as a beverage, of intoxicating liquors, was called for second reading, and this motion of Mr. Ross was carried on a division of 48 yeas to 28 nays. Several railways were aided, and the bill authorizing this was read a third time on May 25th, being carried on a division of 52 yeas to 31 nays. Prorogation took place on May 27th, and assent was given to one hundred and seventeen acts. -A general election was held in June, 1894, and the Government was again sustained. When the new Legis lature met on February 21st, 1895, William Douglas Balfour, Esq., was chosen to fill the Speaker's chair, and the Lieut.-Governor, who had retired while the Speaker was being elected, returned, and read his Speech. It had been the custom to occupy two days in the formalities incidental to opening each new Legislature, but the more simple procedure now obtains of presenting the Speaker 310 SIXTH, SEVENTH AND EIGHTH LEGISLATURES to His Honor immediately after his election. The Speech is then read and public business so far expedited. Hon. W. D. Balfour sat for South Essex in the Legislative Assembly from 1882 to the date of his death in August, 1896. He was publisher and editor of the Reform paper in Amherstburg. At all times a great worker, he devoted his life to political labor, and no man ever served his party more faithfully. In speaking, his matter was carefully prepared, and the points made by him were excellent, but a too rapid utterance de tracted from the value of his addresses. He could arouse the enthusiasm of his hearers, but the efforts made, for he never spared himself, gradually weakened his frail con stitution, and the toil of the election after he had joined the Administration hastened his end. He had been Speaker only a short time when he was taken into the Government, and his death, at the moment when he had attained a position of greater usefulness, was particu larly sad. His great popularity amongst his own people was shown by the immense crowd attending his funeral. The Speech read by Lieut.-Governor Kirkpatrick in 1895 was brief, but had several matters prominently im portant. The Supreme Court of Canada having held that the province had no power to pass a prohibitory liquor law, the Government was taking the necessary proceedings for an appeal to Her Majesty's Privy Coun cil upon the question. Bills were to be introduced for the extension of the Factory Act and the Children's Pro tection Act, and for revising and consolidating the Acts relating to agriculture, and to mechanics' institutes and free libraries. The arbitrators adjusting unsettled accounts between the Dominion and the provinces of Ontario and Quebec were still making progress. SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA A measure having in view the simplifying of certain legal proceedings would be introduced, and the question of the maintenance of Government House would be con sidered. A long-familiar figure was missed from the House this session, and one of the announcements made by Mr. Speaker was that the Clerk, having been notified that a vacancy had occurred in the representation of the city of London, owing to William Ralph Meredith having accepted an office of profit at the nomination of the Crown, had issued a writ for an election, and Thomas Saunders Hobbs, Esq., was elected to fill the vacancy. On the report of the judges for the trial of election petitions, James Conmee, West Algoma, and William A. Willoughby, East Northumberland, were declared elected, and the following persons were declared not elected : George Tucker, West Wellington ; Edward Handley Smythe, Kingston. Honorable William Harty was returned as elected for Kingston. Mr. Craig, seconded by Mr. McNeish, moved the address on 22nd of February, and it was passed on the same day. A motion was made by Mr. Haycock on the 13th of March, that the maintenance of Government Hovise should, after the expiration of five years from the ap pointment or other earlier determination of the term of office of His Honor the present Lieut.-Governor be dis continued. The Attorney-General moved in amendment that the matter should be referred to a special committee. This was carried by a vote of 44 yeas to 37 nays. This was the session in which the Patrons of Industry were largely represented, and when their leader, Mr. 312 SIXTH, SEVENTH AND EIGHTH LEGISLATURES Haycock was a power in the House and country. But the fight was brief. These members speedily perceived that they had nothing to gain by union with the Con servatives, and that to carry out their views they must work in unison with those who were promoting sensible changes as well as the preservation of well-tried usages. Measures with little but novelty to recommend them and class representation for its own sake are not likely to succeed under our system. On the 3rd of April a bill was read a second time to provide for the admission of women to the study and practice of the law, and was adopted by a vote of 61 yeas to 27 nays. There was a split between the extremists on a proposed bill by Mr. Haycock to amend the Act respecting the Legislative Assembly, and it was lost on a division where Reformers and Conservatives alike were recorded against it, the vote being 74 yeas to 13 nays. " And," to quote the quaint language of the Journal, " so it passed in the negative." In the last days of the session the Opposition exer cised pretty freely its rights of criticism and suggestion. The vexed question as to the propriety of the employ ment of prison labor in manufacturing was up for dis cussion, and when expenditure for educational purposes was being considered, Mr. Whitney put in a plea for an extension of the work to be done in public schools, a matter in which he continued to take an active interest. The session came to an end on the i6th of April, after one hundred and twenty-seven acts had been assented to. In 1896 the House met on the nth of February, and the Speech read by His Honor was rather pessimistic in tone. Business in several lines was depressed, the lumber 313 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA trade being especially dull, but the agricultural and mining industries were being fostered and developed. Perhaps the most important measure foreshadowed was a bill reducing the number of members of county councils. This bill aroused much discussion, and amend ments, ranging from the six months' hoist to the suppress ing or changing of certain sections, were offered and defeated. Though well intended, the measure never received full popular approval, and a return has been made to the system which it superseded. Private bills asking for power to build and operate lines of electric railways were appearing in considerable numbers, and a bill amending the Electric Railway Act of the previous session was introduced. The powers of the province to enact prohibitory liquor legislation were still undecided, and in this matter the Legislature was marking time. Though there was little legislation to excite interest or contention, one hundred and twenty-two acts received the Royal assent when Lieut.-Governor Kirkpatrick pro rogued the House on the 7th of April, 1896. During the recess the Dominion elections took place. The Reformers were victorious, and Sir Oliver Mowat bade farewell to the Provincial Legislature, and became Minister of Justice at Ottawa. 314 SIR OLIVER MOWAT. Premier of Ontario for about a quarter oE a century. CHAPTER XXIII. CLOSING WORDS. In bringing to a close this brief summary of the early workings of Confederation in Ontario, I may be per mitted to note the thought which has presented itself to me during the progress of my labor, and in point ing out, what has already been realized, that a com plete history of the province, from the inception of the Mowat regime to its end, cannot be adequately told in a single volume. A mere sketch of the doings of the period which has elapsed since Confederation was brought about is all that has been attempted by me, and I gladly make way for better pens to work out a com plete story of the events of the last forty years. I have attempted to familiarize the reader with some of the forms through which our laws pass in their making, and hinted at a few of the main incidents of the period, but to look back at the comparatively little that has been done by me is to convince me of the great extent of that still left untouched, and to lead to the hope that some other one, before reaching the age of an octogenarian, may take up the tangled threads and weave from them a fuller, brighter and more thorough and coherent story. Much has been accomplished by those who have already written largely upon the subject of Canadian history, and they are necessarily to be consulted, but more is to be found in the files of old newspapers, records of travellers, 315 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA the written sketches of localities, letters of private indi viduals, municipal records, and other sources of original information than in the parliamentary proceedings of which I have had knowledge and to which I have in a great measure confined myself. I have felt that my story is incomplete, from the fact that the field to be gone over by the explorer and nar rator is too extended for limited time. It was not commenced until two or three months of my eighty-first year had elapsed, and even now I am conscious that I have scarcely passed the threshold of my subject. My aim has been to cover what may be termed the Mowat period. It will be noted that men who came on the scene since that time have been purposely left to other notice. That period of our provincial history is unique, and ought to remain unbroken in a narrative of the time in which Ontario recommenced its growth. Whatever con temporaries may have said as to his methods, the fact remains that the work was done, and well done; that Oliver Mowat built up a state out of a comparative wil derness, and gave to it laws, steadily enforced, which were necessary to its existence and its growth. To engage in this glorious work — for such it was in the hands of a man who saw the immediate future clearly, and used that knowledge to make way for its coming — was a noble finish to a long public life, and must make his regime as memorable as that of any who have pre ceded or may foHow him. It seems fitting that the work of such an era should stand alone in its treatment by the critic. The term of Mr. Mowat's premiership, extend ing from 1872 to 1896, covered what may be regarded as the high tide of Liberalism in Ontario, for it witnessed 316 CLOSING WORDS the creation or amendment of laws bearing upon every possible subject — social, political or educational. One of the first demands of an established people is a recog nition of the rights of the represented. In extension of the suffrage, protection of the polling booth, the purity of the election and of electoral machinery, the equal rights of voter and representative were vigorously guarded, in the voters' list, the ballot-box, the punishment of bribery, the controverted election law, and the impartial decisions of a clean judiciary. Municipal laws were reformed so. often and so regularly that some men complained of what they termed "tinkering." Education kept pace with, or went even beyond, the demands of the educated. From public school to university not a single year passed without some needed change, if you will, but reform undoubtedly. The school-house is the foundation of popular liberty, and it was built with unsparing expendi ture of public funds. The compact with those controll ing the separate schools of the province was honestly maintained in the face of frequent attack. Lands to actual settlers were profusely, not extravagantly, granted. Our assessment laws were gradually but effectively brought into unison with all that the light of the time and the experience of the past had revealed on the sub ject. Our timber, a valued asset, was economically man aged. A moderate succession duty was exacted in accordance with a general sense of justice, and which yearly meets with growing approval. Railways were gen erously, perhaps lavishly, assisted, but nobody complained of excessive liberality in that direction, the need of means of transport being great. The law of dower and pro vision for the widows of intestates, and the grant of municipal suffrage to women, presaged a more liberal acknowledgment of the part which woman takes in the 317 SIXTY YEARS IN UPPER CANADA growth of civilization. Temperance advancement was notably illustrative of the progress of the time. In fact, it is useless to continue a list so markedly indicative of the blessings brought about by a free people in a quarter of a century when wisely and fearlessly led. The future, influenced by the past, should have even better things in store, and the model set by the unequalled premiership of a progressive but conserving statesman will long live in the minds of the electors of Ontario. 318 INDEX TO NAMES OF PERSONS SPECIALLY MENTIONED. Abbott, J. J. C, 109. Awrey, Nicholas, 275. Aylmer, Col. Lord, 133. Baldwin, Hon. Robert, 77, 95. Balfour, Hon. W. D., Speaker, 271, 277. Ballantyne, Hon. Thos., Speaker, 301, 307. Barber, William, 97, 158. Barr, John, M.D., 231. Baxter, Hon. J., Speaker, 162, 292. Bell, Robert, 229, 232. Bethune, James, 208. Bigelow, N. G., 308. Biggar, W. H., 303. Bishop, Archibald, 205. Blake, Hon. Edward, 142, 180, 182. Boulter, G. H., M.D., 183, 194. Boulton, D'Arcy, 203. Brega, Solomon, Editor, 44, 58. Bright, Hon. John, 29. Broder, Andrew, 231. Brown, Hon. George, 58, 59, 68, 138. Bruce, Major, 49. Caldwell, Wm. C, 190. Calvin, D. D., 147. Cameron, Hon. Malcolm, 66, 75. Cameron, Hon. Matthew Crooks, 144, 181. Campbell, Sir Alexander, Lt.- Gov., 140, 29-S, 304, 306. Carling, Hon. John, 140, 247. Cascaden, John, M.D., 264, 285. Chisholm, Kenneth, 234. Clancy, James, 276. Clarke, Charles, Speaker, 229, 242, 267. Clarke, E. F., 300. Clarke, H. E., 275. Clarke, John, M.D., 207. Clemens, Isaac, 161. Cobden, Hon. Richard, 29, 45. Conmee, James, 299. Coyne, John, 158. Craig, James, 165. Crawford, Hon. J. W., Lt.-Gov., 199, 211. Creighton, David, 216. Crooks, Hon. Adam, 180, 213, 268. Cumberland, Lt.-Col., 159. Currie, Hon. J. G., Lt.-Col., 177, 200. Daly, T. M., 206. Davis, Hon. Elihu, 303. Dawson, Simon J., 131, 159. Deroche, H. M., 167, 178. Dickenson, John, 27;. Dowling, John, M.D., 281. Drury, Hon. Charles, 263. Dryden, Hon. John, 260. Elgin, Lord, Gov.-Gen., 46, 47, 50. Ermatinger, C. O., 276. Evanturel, Hon. F. E. A., Speaker, 299. Farwell, Abram, 196. 19 INDEX TO NAMES OF PERSONS Ferguson, Robert, 299. Ferguson, Thos. R., 204. Ferris, James M., 233. Fleming, John, 234. Fraser, Hon. C. F., 188, 237, 283. Freeman, John B., "Whip," 262. French, F. J., 266. Galbraith, D., 161. Garrow, Hon. J. C, 303. Gibbon, Robert, 164. Gibson, Thomas, 177. Gibson, Hon. J. M., Lt.-Col., 258. Gillmor, Lt.-Col., 247. 305. Gow, Hon. Peter, 180. Graham, Major, 128. Graham, K., 164. Grange, John T., 164. Guthrie, Donald, 297. Hagarty, Hon. John H., 304, 306. Harcourt, Hon. Richard, 230. Hardy, Hon. A. S., 188, 201, 240. Hargraft, W. W., 234. Harty, Hon. Wm., 305. Hawley, Geo. D., 266. Hay, D. D., 226. Haycock, Joseph T., 312, 313. Hays, W., 163. Higinbotham, Lt.-Col., 132. Hobbs, Thos. S., 312. Hodgins, Thomas, 207. Hopkins, Caleb, 66. Hoste, Colonel, 131. Howland, Hon. W., Lt.-Gov., 59, 60, 136, 190. Hunter, J. H., 232. Kerns, Wm, , Lt.-Col., 276. Kerr, William, 113. Kirkpatrick, Hon. George A., Lt.-Gov., 307. Kirkwood, James, 305. Laidlaw, James, 264. Lauder, A. W., 197. Leslie, James, 66. List of members first Legislature, 145. Long, Wm. Thomas, 234. Macdonald, Hon. D. A., Lt.-Gov., 139, 21 r, 242, 247. Macdonald, H. S., 157. Macdonald, Sir John A., 68, 82, 109, 139. Macdonald, Hon. John S., 137, 174, 175, i8g. Macdougall, Hon. William, 56, 60, 214. Mackenzie, Hon. Alex., 66. Mackenzie, Wm. Lyon, 53. MacMahon, James, M.D., 262. MacNab, Sir Allan, 47. Massie, James, 219. McGee, Hon. T. D'Arcy, 83. McKay, Angus, M.D., "Whip," 297. McKellar, Hon. Archibald, 136, 142, 180. McKim, Robert, 271, 277. McLaughlin, J. W., M.D., 276. McManus, George, 207. Meredith, Sir William, 189, 198, 282, 312. Merrick, Henry, 195. Metcalfe, J. H., 264. Miller, J. C, 219. Monk, George W., "Whip," 199. Monteith, Andrew, 207. Morgan, WilHam, " Whip," 263. Morris, Hon. Alexander, 227, 283. Mowat, Sir Oliver, loi, 104, 188, 191, 236, 262, 278. Near, D., 264. Neelon, Sylvester, 233. O'Connell, Daniel, 29. O'Connor, H. P., 274. O'Donoghue, D. J., 205. Oliver, Adam, 206. 320 INDEX TO NAMES OF PERSONS Pardee, Hon. T. B., 159, 188. Parker, Dr., 82. Parkhill, W. J., 265. Paterson, Peter, 208. Patterson, Hon. J. C, 232. Paxt6n, Thomas, 162. Perry, George, 163. Perry, Peter, 67. Rayside, James, 300. Richards, Hon. S., 141. Richardson, Lt.-Col., 127. Robinson, Hon. John Beverley, Lt.-Gov., 249, 272. Robinson, Thos., Dramatist, 21. Robinson, W., M.D., 208. Ross, A. M., Lt.-Col., 221. Ross, Hon. G. W., 268. Ryerson, Egerton, 213. Rykert, John Charles, 210. Scott, Hon. R. W., Speaker, 167, 176. Scott, Thomas, 181. Scott, W. H., 209. Sexton, William, 165. Sinclair, Daniel, 147, 160. Smith, Sir Henry, 140. Springer, M., 160. Stevenson, Hon. J., Speaker, 143. Stisted, Major-General, Lt.-Gov., I3S- Stock, Thomas, 161. Stratton, Hon. J. R., 298. Taylor, Lt.-Col., 132. Trow, James, 164. Waters, John, 262. Watterworth, John, 235. Wells, R. M., Speaker, 200, 212. Wetenhall, John, 78. White, Solomon, 233. Whitney, Hon. J. P., 108, 295, 313- Widdifield, Joseph, M.D., 232. Wigle, Lewis, 231. Williams, Lt.-Col., 158. Williams, James, 160. Wilson, J. H., M.D., 178. Wolseley, Sir Garnet, 131. Wood, A. F., 265. Wood, Hon. E. B., 140, 152, 182. Wood, Hon. S. C, 188, 213. Workman, Joseph, M.D., 58, 77. Young, Hon. James, 244, 266, 314- 321 i15 8192 yM immm "3,.'." if''* f-vS j.K^-ji^.'j % > ;A*.^ig il M .. ',"¦1:1,,;-*; •»S> J.CJ m