*v;#'^l|f:?:-l;ivA -- ;'\v' - - #i~4i^4l Yale Uoiyersity Library 39002004840311 ^\ kV"}*?!^! x^- .>-*y V^S £S':*M,;^! * wftAfc^HF'^r' 1*^' '¦\^ \- i ii * HISTORX OF ^ERKS (OUNTY, PENNSYL-VANIA, REVOLUTION, FKOM l'Z'Z4 to I'ZSS, MORTON L. MONTGOMERY, MEMBER OF THE BAR OF BERKS COUNTY, Autlior of " Political Hand Book of Berks County" (1883), " History of Berks County" (l886), " School History of Berks County " {1889), and " Life and Times of Conrad Weiser " (1893). Volume Arkangbd in Two Books : BOOK I.— Revolution. BOOK II.— Biographical Sketches. READING, PA.: Chas, F. Haagh, Printer, Seventh and Court Streets. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1894, by MORTON L. MONTGOMERY, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D C. PREFACE. HE first attempt at the compilation of local history in Berks County -was made in 1841 by William Stable, a storekeeper at Read- "W^ ing. He published a small volume of 68 pages in the English and German languages, in separate editions, -which related chiefly to the busi ness affairs of Reading, and -was entitled, "A Descrip tion of the Borough of Reading." It -was prepared by a promising young la-wyer, Jackson H. Sherman, -who had shortly before been admitted to practice in the courts of Berks County. He -was a man of considerable talent, but the re sult of his labor sho-ws that he lacked the real spirit of research and the true love of authorship. The facts collected by him fall far short of -what might have been gathered at that time -with ordinary pains. The opportunity -was afforded for collecting important data that -was truly enviable. Many persons -were still living -who could have supplied numerous particulars, either of their o-wn kno-wledge or from hearsay ; and various documents of an historical nature -were still in existence, -which could have been consulted and made the basis of a most exhaustive and reliable history. As to the Revolution, the nine survivors (-whose names are mehtioned) could have been easily in terrogated. All of them -were over seventy-five years 4 PREFACE. old. When the struggle for independence -was going on, they -were young men. By their assistance, the compiler could have collected sufficient materials to have enabled him to -write a satisfactory story of the part that Berks County took in the -war ; and by patient inquiry and determination he could have ob tained almost every important fact -worth mentioning. But this opportunity -was neglected ; and this neglect is surprising to me, for the reason that there -were then at Reading at least a dozen men -who -were highly qualified to compile an interesting and correct history, not only by their education, but also by their social position and their ample means, which -would have enabled them to go ahead earnestly and success fully, -without the fear of embarrassment or failure. The next attempt ¦was made by I. Daniel Rupp, of Lancaster, in 1844. For some years before, he had been gathering information relating to a number of counties in Pennsylva nia that lay to the east and -west of the Susque hanna River, and the result of his persever ing industry -was pub lished in separate vol umes, entitled after the several counties. One of them was the "History of Berks and Lebanon Counties," an octavo volume of 504 ^. <0. c^B^yi^ PREFACE. 5 pages. His local information does not show much re search. Beyond the taxables and the descriptive nature of the work, his effort is not to be classed above that of Stable' s. The joining of Lebanon County to Berks was a misconception, because there was no just reason for doing so. He should have joined Schuylkill County, for which there were many good reasons. The disconnected portions about the Revolution are of the most ordinary nature. With the ability and experience that he apparently possessed to guide and encourage him, he should have been particularly successful, because he was looking up so many counties at the same time and for the same purpose. His chief aim must have been personal rather than general. He gave considerable space to two promi nent political characters of Berks County (Weiser and Hiester), and also several ministers, without even a reference to others. Joseph Hiester, it is true, acted his part well in the Revolution ; but there were other men who were his superiors in various ways, and yet Rupp did not regard them as worth looking after at all. I allude to such active and influential men as Edward Biddle, George Nagel, Henry Haller, Jacob Morgan, Nicholas Lotz, Mark Bird, Bodo Otto, Jona than Potts, Daniel Udree, Daniel Hunter, Daniel Brodhead, Valentine Eckert, John Lesher and John Patton. These men were so prominent that he could not have failed to learn much about them while making his inquiries, if he had directed his efforts in the proper way. Until then, the natural and inevitable changes from the lapse of time were not numerous nor great. Many 6 PREFACE. of the older buildings, erected before 1776, still re mained. Hence documents and correspondence of all kinds could have been found in the different counties that would have proven of incalculable value. But during the lapse of forty years more, the changes were both numerous and great, and matters and things had not only come to be disturbed very much, but many valuable links connecting the past with the present, that is to say, the times of 1776 with those of 1826, and particularly with 1876, were absolutely gone. When I came to interest myself earnestly in historical subjects after 1880, I was not only surprised but very much disappointed to find available materials about the Revolution so limited at Reading ; and personal inquiries at Harrisburg, Lancaster, Philadelphia and Washington were next to fruitless. The men at Read ing, from 1830 to 1850, who were highly qualified for literary work, with leisure to accomplish it, are inex cusable for this gross neglect respecting a topic of such general value and importance. Even the proprietors of newspapers of that interesting period did not regard such information as worthy of preservation. The peo ple seemed to turn constantly towards distant coun tries for knowledge relating to general history, govern ment, &c. ; and it never occurred to them that local matters were more important in the daily affairs of life. The Revolution was a subject that was particularly valuable, for the reason that it concerned their own personal freedom, unrestricted enterprise and local government ; and a discussion of its causes, its merits and its successes would have given the two succeed ing generations a higher conception of these elevating PREFACE. 7 and ennobling ideas. This notion has been trans mitted even until now, making it apparent that progress in this respect could not be expected to reach a plane above that occupied then. In 1859, Amos K. Strunk, of Boyertown, published a small and useful book of 124 pages that contains the names of officers of the county who officiated from 1752 to i860. He caused it to be printed in two editions, one in the Eng- He gave much labor to its compilation, but he received only a little praise for his pains and efaterprise. In 1883, I published the "Political Hand-Book of Berks County" (octavo volume of 104 pages), an enlargement of Strunk's idea as a book of reference. These two publications did not make any pretensions beyond the subject treated, and nothing else should be looked for in them. In 1886, 1 completed the " History of Berks County," a royal octavo volume of 1204 pages. In it I devoted thirty-one pages (double column) to the Revolu tion. That was something on this line of inquiry, a good start ; but a comparison of the matters therein contained with the contents of this volume will show that I had made only a feeble attempt at portraying the part Berks County accomplished in that important crisis of our history. In the short time that has elapsed since 1886, a considerable new information about the Revolution has come to light. The State of Pennsylvania published several additional volumes 8 PREFACE. of Archives which were devoted entirely to that topic. Yet with this information as to Berks County added, and the whole narrative reconstructed, I still find this compilation imperfect and short of what it should be. The patriots from Berks County in the war for personal liberty and free government had a right to expect succeeding generations to appreciate their sacrifices and to preserve a record of their actions. In doing their part well, they were not only prompted by selfish considerations for the enjoyment of privileges and advantages in their day, but by noble impulses for justice, and by the hope that their children would have the blessings of self-government, equality and peace. Such a record, however, was neglected by the next generation after them, and even by the second generation. What would those heroes, as colonels and captains and committeemen have said to their sons and grandsons if, by some mysterious power, they should have appeared in 1826, more especially in 1876, and seen naught done by way of recognizing or appre ciating their services for freedom ? The third genera tion is also rapidly passing away. Shall it be said of the great-grandsons that they, too, have not shown a proper spirit of appreciation ? My great-grandfather, John Spohn, was one of the captains of the year 1776. As a great-grandson of one of the heroes of that momentous struggle, I have en deavored to do my part towards building up a record worthy of their courage in the destructive ordeal of war for the right of self-government, and I hope it will be the means of awakening a proper spirit of in- PREFACE. 9 quiry by other descendants, looking to a completion of the undertaking herein attempted. This volume is arranged in two books. The first is devoted to show the public support given by the people of Berks County to the Revolution ; and the second to historical sketches of the more prominent men from the county who were engaged in active service. The former required much labor, research and study ; but numerous facts in the latter were far more tedious to obtain. The zinc etchings, published in connection with the biographical sketches, were made by John E. Heinly and William Diener, of the Reading Wood Cut and Photo- Engraving Company. The names are facsimiles of signatures, which I copied from the last wills of the respective persons on file in the Register's office, or from the entry of satisfaction of mortgages in the Recorder's office. I have not given any references, showing the sources of my information, because a great many pages would have been marred by numerous repetitions of the same book ; and also because the general reader is not in terested in foot notes. The greater part of my in formation in the first book was obtained from the valu able publications issued by the State of Pennsylvania, namely, the Colonial Records and Pennsylvaitia Ar chives, first and second series ; and in the second book from the papers on file, and also from the records in the offices of the Register and Recorder of Berks County. Besides the publications mentioned, the more prominent books consulted are the following : IO PREFACE. Rupp's History of Berks and Lebanon Counties. Scharf & "VVescott's History of Philadelphia Count.\-. Puthey & Cope's History of Chester County. Bean's History of Montgomery County. Rupp's History of Lancaster County. Mombert's History of Lancaster County. Egle's History of Dauphin and Lancaster Counties. American Archives (Penn'a Historical Society). Irving's Life of 'Washington. Autobiography of Charles Biddle. Bancroft's History of the United States. Ramsey's History of the United States. Johnson's Campaign of 1776 Around Brooklyn and Ne-w York. I acknowledge the kindly attentions of Dr. William H. Egle (State Librarian of Pennsylvania), and Mr. Frederick D. Stone (Librarian of Pennsylvania His torical Society), to me at various times during the course of my researches for this compilation. I cannot conclude this preface without expressing my appreciation of the co-operation and indulgence of Mr. Charles F. Haage, the printer, in the satisfactory production of this volume as to its arrangement, appearance, etc., for they contributed a great deal of encouragement to me in the completion of mj' arduous undertaking. Reading, Pa., June 1, 1894. CONTENTS. BOOK I.— REVOLUTION. INTRODUCTION 17-18 CHAPTER I. CAUSE OF THE REVOLUTION 19-31 CHAPTER II. PATRIOTIC SPIRIT OF THE COUNTY 33-38 Public Meeting at Reading, July 3, 1774 ; Resolutions Adopted; Committee Appointed — Provincial Con ference, July 15, 1774 — Congress of Deputies, Sept. 4, 1774 — Committee of Observation Chosen at Pub lic Meeting, Dec. 5, 1774 — Delegates to Provincial Convention Appointed, Jan. 3, 1775 — Letters to Lan caster Committee — Circular Letter as to 'Wool — Resolutions of Provincial Convention — Battle at Lexington A-wakens Countj' — Conscientious Scru ples Against "War — First OfBcers Selected from County by Council of Safety — Germans to the Res cue — Population and Districts of County in 1776. CHAPTER HI. ASSOCIATORS 39-43 Counties of Pennsylvania in 1775 — Recommendation of Congress — County Colonels of Associators — Pre amble to Articles of Association — County Committee Recommends Articles. 1 2 CONTENTS. CHAPTER IV. INDEPENDENCE OP THE PROVINCE 43-55 Suppression of British Authority — Support of Civil Authority by the County — Provincial Conference, June, 1776 ; Deputies from County ; Address ; Declaration of Independence ; Address for Flying Camp — Declaration of Independence by Congress ; Read in County, July 8, 1776 — Constitutional Con vention of the Province; County Delegates Elected; Preamble to Constitution: Declaration of Rights. CHAPTER V. MILITIA SYSTEM 56-74 System Provided by General Assembly — County Re turns for 1775— County Returns for 1776; Delegates from County to Lancaster Convention, July 4, 1776 — County Returns for 1777 — New System Provided, June 13, 1777; Oath of Allegiance Re quired ; County Districts Established; Battalions, Companies and Classes ; Pay and Rations ; Days of Drill ; Fines ; Pensions ; Persons Exempted from Service; Oaths Administered in the County — County Returns for 1778— County Returns for 1780 — County Returns for 1783. CHAPTER VI. COMPANIES FROM COUNTY IN THE REVOLUTION 75-150 In 1775. Nagel's Company at Cambridge; Roll of Company; Services of Company. In 1776. Jones's Company in Canada Campaign ; Roll of Com pany ; Services of Company— Companies at Ne-vv York : Of Captains John Spohn, Peter Decker and Henry Christ ; Services of Companies— Lotz's Bat talion in Plying Camp; Field and Commissioned Officers; Letter of Standing Committee to Con- CONTENTS. 13 gress; Intentions of Congress Explained; County Troops at Bethlehem ; Marching Order to Capt Daniel DeTurck ; Roll of Company ; Order to Or ganize; Battle of Long Island ; Incidents of Hies ter's Company — 'Weiser's Company in the German Regiment ; Roll of Company ; Services of Com pany ; Other Men from County in the Regiment — County Troops at South Amboy ; Battalion of Col. John Patton ; Field Officers of Battalion ; Compa nies of Captains John Lesher, Michael "Wolf, George Miller and Michael Furrer ; Battalion of Col. Mark Bird ; Letter to Council of Safetj' ; Resolution of Congress — Haller's Battalion near Trenton; Letter to Council of Safety; Resolution of Council of Safety. In 1777. Hunter's Battalion in New Jersey; Letter of Col. Daniel Brodhead ; Resolution of Council of Safety ; Letter from Gen'l Israel Putnam — Three Companies at Newtown ; Letter of Gen'l Thomas Mifflin ; Com panies of Captains George 'Will, John Diehl and Nicholas Scheffer — County Men in Continental Line ; Companies, of Captains Jacob Moser and Jacob Bower ; Sundry Enlistments : Captains, Sub alterns and Privates — Two Battalions at Chester, Commanded by Hunter and Udree — Spyker's Bat talion at "White Marsh ; Lieutenant Whitman 'Wounded at Germantown — AVashington's Arm,y near the County — Troops Encamped at Kutztown — No British Invasion of County. In 1778. Dragoons from the County in Provost Guard ; Company of Capt. Bartholomew Von Heer — Lindemuth's Battalion on the Frontiers. In 1780. Hiester's Battalion with Reed's Army ; Field Officers ; Companies of Captains Charles Gobin, Ferdinand Ritter, Conrad Sherman, John Ludwig, Jacob Baldy and Henry Strouch ; Selections from the 3rd Battalion — Two Companies of Ely's Battalion in the Frontier Service ; Inhabitants Killed by the Indians. 14 CONTENTS. In 1781. Class of Lindemuth's Battalion on the Frontiers — Ely's Battalion at Newtown ; Company of Capt. John Robinson — Capt. Jacob Livingood's Company. In 1783. County Troops on the Frontiers ; Robinson's Company in Northumberland County ; Sundry Troops Sup plied. Other Enlistments from the County ; Names of Men Ascertained — Army Surgeons from the County; Hospitals at Reading — Reports of Men Supplied from the County — Payments for County Militia. CHAPTER VII. PRISONERS OF WAR AT READING 151-167 English Prisoners ; Letter from Committee to Dele gates in Congress ; Conduct of Prisoners ; Letter from James Read to Council of Safety ; Quaker Prisoners from Philadelphia ; .Company of Capt. Conrad Geist on Guard Duty — Hessian Prisoners ; Letter by Council of Safety about Removal of Prisoners to Reading ; Camp Located on Commons ; Camp Surprised by Militia in Disguise of Indians ; Officer Drowned ; Sickness and Burial of Hessians — German Prisoners ; Company of Capt. Charles Krause on Guard Duty ; Additional Men as Guard ; Continental Troops as Guard ; County Militia as Guard ; Order of Council of Safety ; Company of Capt. Peter Nagel on Guard Duty. CHAPTER VIII. ESTIMATE OF MEN IN SERVICE 168-173 For the Years 1775, 1776, 1777, 1778, 1780, 1781 and 1783 — Recapitulation — Names of Captains Ascer tained—Names of Colonels Ascertained. CONTENTS. 15 CHAPTER IX. ARMY SUPPLIES FROM THE COUNTY 174-189 Store House at Reading — Reports of Supplies Manufac tured — Reports of Supplies Collected — Supplies taken in Oley in 1778 — Masts for the United States Navy — Receipt Book of Col. Nicholas Lotz — Promi nent Industries ; Names and Location of Furnaces and Forges; Iron Masters; Other Industries — Prices during the Revolution — Pay of Men in Service — Con tinental Paper Money. CHAPTER X. PROCLAMATIONS FOR THE FAVOR OF GOD .... 190-193 First Recommendation of Congress for Prayer — Appeal for Support in Warfare — Proclamation Issued by Executive Council — Observance by County. CHAPTER XI. COUNTY INCUMBENTS OF POSITIONS 194^197 National Positions — State Positions — County Positions. CHAPTER XII. AFFAIRS AT READING 198-304 Public Papers Removed from Philadelphia — Social Con dition in 1777 — Conway-Cabal supposed at Reading — Duel at Reading — Pre-Revolutionary Buildings at Reading. CHAPTER XIII. CONCLUSION 305-308 Independence and Peace — Return of the Soldiers — Revo lutionary Survivors in 1833; in 1840; in 1846. i6 CONTENTS. BOOK IL— BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. Edward Biddle 309 Mark Bird 313 Jacob Bovver 314 Michael Bright 215 Daniel Brodhead 316 Edward Burd 318 Henry Christ 319 Peter Decker 330 George Douglass 330 Thomas Dundas 331 Valentine Eckert 323 Conrad Eckert 334 George Ege . ; 335 BalserGeehr 327 Alexander Graydon 230 Henry Haller 230 Gabriel Hiester 333 Joseph Hiester 333 Daniel Hunter 235 Thomas- Jones, Jr 336 John Lesher 337 Daniel Levan 338 Sebastian Levan 338 Abraham Lincoln 239 Jacob Livingood 241 Nicholas Lotz 343 Christian Lower 245 John Ludwig 346 Jacob Morgan 24? Jacob Morgan, Jr 250 David Morgan 353 George Nagel 254 Peter Nagel 255 Bodo Otto 258 John A. Otto 361 John Patton 363 Jonathan Potts 363 Collinson Read 264 James Read 365 William Reeser 266 Christopher Schultz 267 Edward Scull 268 Peter Scull 268 Charles Shoemaker 369 Jacob Shoemaker 271 John Soder 271 John Spohn 272 Benjamin Spyker 274 Peter Spyker 375 Henry Spyker 270 Daniel Udree 277 Henry Vanderslice 280 Benjamin Weiser 281 Christopher Witman 282 cm II IHE RtilUIi. BOOK I.— REVOLUTION. INTRODUCTION. The American Revolution was carried on from 1774 to 1783 against Great Britain by the thirteen Colonies that constituted the prominent settlements along the Atlantic coast from New Hampshire to Georgia, and existed under organized forms of government. The direct cause was the attempted imposition of increased taxes by parliament upon the inhabitants without representation or without their consent. The great majority of the people were distinguished for their steadfast determination and inflexible resolution in such an important matter as concerned their personal welfare, more especially the leaders of public thought and action in the several colonies, and this widely- prevailing sentiment developed amongst them a spirit of opposition that was earnest, persistent and cour ageous. This sentiment, however, was not created in 1774. It had its origin thirty, even forty, if not fifty, years- before. Without a steady growth through a number of years, it could not have become substantial. Look- 1 8 REVOLUTION. ing at the situation and qualification of the people in this manner, we can not fail to give great credit and honor to the men of sound discrimination who lived several decades before that time and exerted a strong influence over them in establishing correct notions of social freedom, political equality, and local rights. The County of Berks was erected in 1752 as a sep arate political body in Pennsylvania. For over thirty years, the taxpayers had been practically interested in public business that related to the laying out of roads for facilitating intercourse of one community with another, and to the erection of townships for admin istering- local affairs. Afterward, in quick succession, numerous things of general concern were conducted in their midst to keep them interested in public pro gress, the more important having been the " Indian Invasion," the erection of the "District of Reading," the proposed change of government, and the building of the Court House and County Prison, together with many township improvements and private enterprises. In this way they were gradually and unconsciously prepared for a more serious undertaking, and when the crisis came that required them to show real apprecia tion of personal rights and local welfare, they mani fested such a wonderful degree of social energy and •co-operative resistance as to enable them to carry bur densome taxation, and endure trying and costly war fare for over eight years, until they finally realized the establishment of free government. REVOLUTION. 19 CHAPTER I. CAUSE OF THE REVOI.UTION. The Parliament of Great Britain passed an Act on March 22, 1765, which required ^lU instruments of writing, such as deeds, bonds and promissory notes, to be written on parchment or paper and stamped with a specific duty, otherwise they were to have no legal effect; but this measure met with such general opposition in Great Britain and throughout the Amer ican colonies, and was found to be so unpopular, that the act was repealed in the following year, February 17, 1766. The cheapest stamp was of the value of one shilling. The stamps on documents increased in value according to their importance. All the colonists manifested unbounded joy over the repeal of this odious law. This opposition, however, led Parliament to pass a declaratory Act — which accompanied the repealing Act — asserting the power over the colonies ' ' in all cases whatsoever." And in 1767 an Act was passed impos ing certain duties on tea, glass, paper, and painters' colors that were imported into the Colonies. There was no representation in Parliament from the several Colonies, and regarding taxation of this kind as unjust and tyrannical, they held public meetings, formed associations to discourage and even to prevent the importation of British goods, and passed appropriate resolutions, which they forwarded to the King. His 20 REVOLUTION. ministers, believing that a reduction of the tax would restore tranquillity, ordered this law also to be re pealed, saving only a tax of three pence per pound on tea; and in 1770 an Act was passed accordingly. But even this was not satisfactory to them, and their recommendations to one another not to receive any tea were strictly carried out. In the meantime, the East India Company had ac cumulated 17,000,000 pounds of this article on hand, and fearing great losses, they led Parliament to author ize the exportation of tea to any part of the world free of duty. With such encouragement, the company in 1774 loaded several ships with tea and sent them to the American Colonies; but the colonists were firm in their resolution and determined to obstruct the sale of it and to refuse to pay even so slight a tax as three pence per pound. When the ships arrived near Phil adelphia and New York, the captains were warned not to land, and, fearing this warning, they returned to England. The tea sent to Charleston was landed, but it could not be sold, and after having been stored for a while in damp cellars it became a total loss to the company. And at Boston, while efforts were being made to land the tea, certain men in the disguise of Indians stole their way upon the vessels, broke open 342 chests of tea and threw the contents overboard. When Parliament heard of these proceedings, an Act was passed, called the "Boston Port Bill," directing the Port of Boston to be closed and the Custom House to be removed to Salem; and other humiliating Acts were also passed which were particularly offensive to the people of Boston, indeed of all Massachusetts. REVOLUTION. 21 Information about these Acts reached Boston on May the loth, and on the 13th, at a town meeting, the in habitants resolved: "That, if the other Colonies would unite with them to stop all importations from Great Britain and the West Indies u'ntil those Acts should be repealed, it would prove the salvation of North America and her liberties; but if they should continue their ex ports and imports, there was reason to fear that fraud, power and the most odious oppression would triumph over justice, right, social happiness and freedom." Copies of this resolution were transmitted to all the other Colonies. It a-wakened not only a feeling of sympathy but a strong spirit of co-operation, and led them to concur in the propriety of calling a Provin cial Congress. Public meetings were held at different places, such as county towns, and, besides discussing topics so im portant to liberty and general welfare, committees of correspondence were appointed to communicate the actions of the several meetings to one another through out the Colonies. In this way it was discovered that the same feeling prevailed everywhere, and naturally there came to be united efforts towards accomplishing a common result for the benefit of all. About this time the terms ''Whigs " and "Tories" were introduced to designate either those who were arrayed on the side of the Colonies in sympathy with Boston, or those who were in sympathy with the pol icy of the British government. 22 REVOLUTION. COURT HOUSE, PKNN SQUARE, READING. REVOLUTION. 23 CHAPTER II. PATRIOTIC SPIRIT OF THE COUNTY. PUBLIC MEETING AT READING IN 1774. When the news reached Reading, in Berks County, the citizens manifested great excitement and meetings were held at which the action of the British govern ment was condemned. These meetings were called by notices headed "Boston Port Bill," and posted throughout the town. A report of one of these meet ings has been preserved, and is presented in this con nection to show what action the people of Reading and vicinity were inspired to take, and what expressions they were led to make in the matter. RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED At a meeting of a very respectable body of free holders and others, inhabitants of the County of Berks, held in the Court House at Reading, the 2d of July, 1774, Edward Biddle, Esq., in the chair, the following resolutions were adopted : "This assembly, taking into their very serious consideration the present critical situation of American affairs, do unanimously resolve as follows, viz.: "1. That the inhabitants of this county do owe, and will pay due allegiance to our rightful Sovereign, King George the Third. "2. That the powers claimed, and now attempted to be put into execution by the British Parliament, are fundamentally wrong, and cannot be admitted without the utter destruction of the liberties of America. 24 REVOLUTION. "3. That the Boston Port Bill is unjust and tyrannical in the extreme. And that the measures pursued against Boston are in tended to operate equally against the rights and liberties of the other colonies. "4. That this assembly doth concur in opinion with their re spective brethren of Philadelphia, that there is an absolute neces sity for an immediate congress of the deputies of the several advices, in order to deliberate upon and pursue such measures as ma.y radically heal our present unhappy disturbances, and settle with precision the rights and liberties of America. "5. That the inhabitants of this county, confiding in the pru dence and ability of the deputies intended to be chosen for the general congress, will cheerfully submit to any measures which may be found by the said congress best adapted for the restoration of harmony between the mother-country and the colonies, and for the security and firm establishment of the rights of America. "6. That, as the people of Boston are now suffering in the grand and common cause of American liberty, "Resolved, That it is the duty of all the inhabitants to con tribute to the support of the said sufferers, and that the commit tee hereafter named do open subscriptions for their relief. And further, that the said committee do lay out the amount of such subscriptions in purchasing flour and other provisions, to be sent by them to our said suffering brethren. "7. That Edward Biddle, James Read, Daniel Brodhead, Henry Christ, Esqs., Christopher Schultz, Thomas Dundas and Jonathan Potts, gentlemen, be, and they are hereby appointed a committee to meet and correspond with the committees from the other counties of the Province." The thanks of the assembly were unanimously voted to the chainnan for the spirited manner in which he pointed out the dangerous situation of all the American colonies. He expressed at the same time the greatest loyalty to King George, notwith standing he had the highest regard for the liberties of America. REVOLUTION. 25 There was great unanimity of sentiment as to the resolutions, and all cordially agreed to sacrifice every temporary advantage for the purpose of securing free dom to themselves and to their posterity. The committee doubtless raised money and for warded flour and provisions to the suffering brethren at Boston soon after the meeting, but I have not been able to ascertain the quantity. Reading was a promi nent centre of trade in 1774, and the country rounda bout possessed an abundance of grain and provisions. There were numerous grist mills within a radius of ten miles, and the collection of many barrels of flour was a comparatively easy matter for such a worthy cause, especially under the appeal of such men as composed the committee. All were capable, influen tial men. Biddle and Read were attorneys, Christ an innkeeper. Potts a physician, Dundas a merchant, Brodhead a large miller of Heidelberg, and Schultz a prosperous farmer of Hereford. Similar meetings were held in the other counties during June and July, and committees were also appointed to act for and represent the respective counties. From this meeting to the close of the Revolution, the people of Reading and of the county participated actively in all the affairs of the province which were conducted towards the establishment of independence. They were represented by delegates at the several conferences; and they contributed their quota of men, money and supplies in the successful prosecution of the war. 26 REVOLUTION. PROVINCIAL CONFERENCE. The delegates from the several counties of the Province were called to meet at Philadelphia on July 15, 1774. This meeting was attended by the com mittee named as representatives from Berks County. The notice for the meeting was issued by the commit tee of Philadelphia City in the following form: "The Governor declining to call the Assembly, renders it neces sary to take the sentiments of the inhabitants; and for that pur pose it is agreed to call a meeting of the inhabitants of this city and county at the State House on Wednesday the 15th instant [July.] And we would wish to have the sentiments and concur rence of our brethren in the several counties who are equally interested with us in the General Cause. We earnestly desire you to call together the principal inhabitants of your count}- and to take their sentiments. We shall forward to you, by every occa sion, anj' matters of consequence that come to our knowledge and we should be glad if you would choose and appoint a committee to correspond with us." The first action of the meeting was the reading of the letters from Boston, dated May 13, 1774, and a statement of the steps taken in consequence thereof, and of the measures pursued in this and the adjoining provinces. Then a series of sixteen appropriate reso lutions were adopted, which are remarkable for earn estness and courage in behalf of local rights and independence; and a committee was appointed to pre pare and bring in a draught of instructions. On this committee was Daniel Brodhead, from Berks Count}-. The committee performed its duty in an admirable manner, and the result of its deliberations was a doc ument truly distinguished for its devotion to the King, but also to the political and social welfare of the peo- REVOLUTION. 27 pie. Upon its adoption, the committee was directed to present the same to the General Assembly (which was then in session at Philadelphia), and this the committee accordingly did, in a body, on the 21st of July. CONGRESS OF DEPUTIES. Among other things in the instructions, they asked the Assembly ' ' to appoint a proper number of persons to attend a Congress of Deputies from the several Colonies at such time and place as may be agreed upon to effect a general plan of conduct;" and the Assembly accordingly appointed eight Deputies from the representatives of the eleven counties in the State. Edward Biddle, Esq., from Berks County, was selected as one of them'. The other Colonies also appointed Deputies. All of them, numbering fifty-five, assem bled at Philadelphia on September 4, 1774, and effected an organization in Carpenters' Hall on the 5th, with Peyton Randolph, of Virginia, as president. The sessions of this Congress were continued until the 25th of October following. Though a desire for conciliation was manifested, the opposition of Mas sachusetts to the Parliamentary legislation was ap proved and the declaration was made that, if the British government should attempt to carry out its provisions, all America ought to unite in sustaining the sister colony in her opposition. The delegates agreed upon a declaration of rights, a determination to stop im ports from and exports to Great Britain and a discon tinuance of the slave trade ; and they also prepared a 28 REVOLUTION. petition to the King and an address to the British ' people. Then they adjourned to meet again at the same place on May lo, 1775, unless redress should be afforded in the meantime. Besides the matters mentioned, this Congress also adopted Articles of Association, and one of the articles provided that a Committee of Observation should be chosen in every county, city and town by the qualified electors. COUNTY COMMITTEE OF OBSERVATION. Pursuant to advertisements scattered throughout Berks County, a respectable number of the inhabi tants met on December 5th, 1774, at the court-house, in Reading, and proceeded by ballot to the election of a committee, as recommended by Congress, when the following gentlemen were duly chosen : Edward Biddle, Michael Bright, Sebastian Levan, Christopher Schultz, John Patton, George Nagel, Dr. Jonathan Potts, Mark Bird, Christopher Witman, William Reeser, John Jones, Jacob Shoemaker, Baltzer Geehr, John Old, James Lewis. In the latter part of December, the Committee re ceived a communication from the Committee of Phil adelphia, dated December 22, 1774, which read as follows: " Gentlemen: By order of the Committee of the City and Lib erties of Philadelphia, we have the pleasure to transmit you the following resolves, passed this day with great unanimity, viz: " That this Committee think it absolutely necessary that the Committees of the Counties of this province, or such deputies as they may appoint for this purpose, be requested to meet together in provincial convention as soon as convenient • and that it be recommended to the County Committees to meet in said convention on Monday, the 23d day of January next, in the City of Philadelphia." REVOLUTION. 29 "From a view of the present situation of public affairs, the Committee have been induced to propose this convention that the sense of the province may be obtained; and that the measures to be taken thereupon may be the result of the united wisdom of the Colonj'. " The obvious necessity of giving an immediate consideration to many matters of the greatest importance to the general welfare will, we hope, sufficiently apologize to you for naming so early a day as the 33d of January." DELEGATES TO PROVINCIAL CONVENTION. In pursuance of this letter, the Committee met at Reading on January 2, 1775, and unanimously agreed to the proposed Provincial Convention, and they ap pointed the following delegates to represent the county at the convention : Edward Biddle, Sebastian Levan, Jonathan Potts, Mark Bird, John Patton, Christopher Schultz. Baltzer Geehr, They also then appointed a Committee of Corre spondence for the county: Edward Biddle, Jonathan Potts, Christopher Witman. Mark Bird, William Reeser, This Committee selected Dr. Jonathan Potts to act as secretary. LETTERS TO LANCASTER COMMITTEE. On the same day. Dr. Potts addressed a letter to the Committee of Correspondence for the County of Lan caster, stating therein that they had received a letter from the Committee of Correspondence of the City and Liberties of Philadelphia, in which it was pro- 30 REVOLUTION. posed that a Provincial Convention be held at Phila delphia on the 23d instant, and adding that they had considered the proposition, unanimously agreed to the convention, and appointed the delegates named to at tend the proposed convention in behalf of Berks County. He concluded his letter by informing them also of the selection of a Committee of Correspondence, and adding the five names of the Committee. Another letter from the same Committee was ad dressed to the Committee of Lancaster on January 5, 1775. It was as follows: "Gentlemen; Enclosed is an extract from the proceedings of the Committee of this County, by which you will see that depu ties are appointed to attend the proposed Provincial Convention. "When we consider that our disputes are drawing fast to a cri sis, and that the most cordial unanimity is absolutely necessary for our preservation, we cannot doubt but that your respectable committee will without hesitation appoint deputies to attend the Provincial Congress. The neglect of any one County may have the most fatal consequences. And we well know the pleasure It would give our enemies to see even the appearance of a disunion at this very imjiortant time. The great consequence of this sub ject will, we hope, apologize for this freedom." CIRCULAR LETTER AS TO WOOL. The following letter, in reference to sheep and wool in the county, was circulated throughout the county during the latter part of January, 1775: "Reading, January 16th, 1775. "To the Farmers of Berks County : "The Committee of the County of Berks having considered the association of the butchers of this town not to kill any sheep ¦ whatsoever till the first day of Jhiy next, take the liberty earn estly to recommend to the inhabitants of this county not to REVOLUTION. 31 sell any sheep whatsoever to any butcher from Philadelphia or elsewhere till the first day of May. The preserving of wool being an object of the greatest consequence, the committee flatter them selves that the farmers will cheerfully observe this recommenda tion, and as the committee will meet in Reading on Tuesday, the 14th day of February, if any inhabitants have any objections to make to the measure hereby recommended, such inhabitants are requested to attend the committee to make their objections, that the same may be maturely considered. • "Any person having wool which he cannot dispose of in the country, may bring it to the house of Mr. Mark Bird, in Reading, who will give fourteen pence per pound for any quantity. "By Order of the Committee, "Jonathan Potts, Secretary." From the patriotic spirit that prevailed, this recom mendation was doubtless observed, but I could not find any notice of a meeting of the Committee on February 14, 1775. RESOLUTIONS OF PROVINCIAL CONVENTION. The delegates from the several counties accordingly assembled at Philadelphia on January 23, 1775, and adopted the following resolutions : -That this Convention most heartily approve of the conduct and proceedings of the Continental Congress. That we will faithfully endeavor to carry into execution the measures of the Association entered into and recommended by them. That, as it was necessary to lay a restraint on importation and supply of articles necessary for subsistence, and clothing and de fense must be provided, no person should use, sell or kill for mar ket any sheep under four years old, and it was recommended that woolen manufactories he set up, especially for coating, flannel, blankets, rags, coverlids, hosiery and coarse cloths. That flax and hemp be raised, and mills be erected for breaking, swinging and softening them; salt made in the manner used in other countries, and saltpetre; gunpowder manufactured as largely 32 REVOLUTION. as possible; nails, wire and steel made, and also different kinds of paper from the old linen and rags preserved for that purpose ; that houses be set up for glass, wool combs and cards, tin plates, copper sheets, bottoms and kettles, grindstones and fulling mills; and as the brewing of malt liquors would tend to render the con sumption of foreign liquors less necessary, that proper attention be given to the cultivation of barley. That all the inhabitants of the province promise themselves to use our own manufactures, and those of the other colonies in preference to all others. That societies be established and premiums be granted in the several counties to persons who may excel in the several branches of manufacturing. That any manufacturer or vender of goods, who shall take advantage of the necessities of his country by selling his mer chandise at an unusual or extravagant profit, shall be considered an enemj' to his countrj- and be advertised as such by the com mittee. That printers use the types made by an ingenious artist in Ger mantown in preference to any which may be hereafter imported. That the Committee of Correspondence of Philadelphia be a standing Committee for the several counties, but to give notice to them whenever a Provincial Council becomes necessary." While preparations were being made for this Con ference, the House of Lords met in London on Jan uary 20th, and it. was on that occasion that Chatham made his brilliant defense of the American Colonies and appealed most eloquently for reconciliation. But his appeal was in vain, for his motion was rejected by a vote of 68 against i8, almost four to one. BATTLE AT LEXINGTON AW.\KENS COUNTY. The battle of Lexington was fought on April 19, 1775. When the news of the battle reached Reading, about a week afterward, a company of men was formed, who wore crape for a cockade in token of the REVOLUTION. 33 sorrow for the slaughter of their brethren. Each township in Berks County resolved to raise and disci pline its company. On the 25th of April, a town meeting was called at Philadelphia, when thousands of the inhabitants assembled, and agreed to associate for the purpose of defending with arms their lives, their property and their liberty. This patriotic feeling prevailed also at Reading and in the county. The following extract of a letter from Reading, dated April 26, 1775, presents it forcibly: "We have raised in this town two companies of foot under proper officers ; and such is the spirit of the people of this free county, that in three weeks time there is not a township in it that will not have a company raised and disciplined, ready to assert at the risk of their lives the freedom of America." The companies mentioned were those commanded by Capt. Ge<3rge Nagel and Capt. John Spohn. Conscientious Scruples against War. — A meeting of deputies of divers inhabitants of the county, who were conscientiously scrupulous against bearing arms, was held at Reading on September i, 1775. They passed certain resolutions, which, briefly stated, were as fol lows: 1. Agreeing to voluntary subscriptions for the uses pointed out by the recommendations of the Assembly on June 30, 1775, and of the Continental Congress on July 18, 1775. 3. Ordering accounts of moneys received and expended to be kept by a treasurer. 3. Submitting the moneys to the disposal of the Committee of Safety as a part of the share to be accounted for by Berks County. 4. Agreeing to answer requisitions on them by the Committee of Safety. 34 REVOLUTION. These resolutions were signed by Wm. Reeser, as president of the meeting. On September ii, 1775, he sent a copy of them to the Committee of Safety, stating in his accompanying letter that they were conscientiously scrupulous of taking up arms, though fully sensible of the justice of the cause, but that they were willing to contribute to its support. He acknowl edged to have received in hands the sum of ;^i52 for the Committee of Safety, and assured the Commit tee that they would ever cheerfully contribute their proportion towards the safety and welfare of the public. FIRST OFFICERS SELECTED FROM THE COUNTY. The first meeting of the Committee of Safety at Philadelphia, which Edward Biddle, Esq., attended, was on January 2, 1776. Congress had recommended that Pennsylvania furnish four battalions of troops, and at this meeting the Committee were to agree upon the four colonels who were to be placed in command. Biddle evidently attended to favor Daniel Brodhead, of Heidelberg town.ship, but he could not control a sufficient number of votes. On the next day they voted for Lieutenant Colonels. Brodhead's name was again presented with seven others, but he was not selected. On the 4th of January, they selected field officers ; George Nagel, of Reading, was one of them. On the following day, he was commissioned as Major of the Third Battalion ; and then they also selected 31 Captains for the four Battalions. Among those chosen were John Spohn, Peter Scull and Peter REVOLUTION. 35 Decker, all of Reading. On January 6th, they se lected 32 Lieutenants. Among them was Daniel Brodhead, of Reading. It appears that Biddle did not attend any meetings after the 6th of January. His absence was doubtless caused by sickness. GERMANS TO THE RESCUE. By looking over the names of the numerous men in Berks county who participated in the movement for independence, it will be found that they are almost entirely German. The population of the county was largely German and of German descent, and this pre ponderance of names over those of all other nation alities was to be expected. The proportion was fully nine-tenths. They used the German language in their daily affairs, excepting the transfer of title to real estate which was required to be in the English lan guage by a provincial law. The location of the Eng lish people in 1775 was mostly at Reading, and in Robeson, Caernarvon, Union, Exeter, Oley, Maiden- creek and Richmond townships, or eight districts out of twenty-nine, but the major part of the people in these districts also was German, excepting the south ern section of the county. It can be stated that Berks county was then distinctively the most German county of the eleven counties in the Province. It was natural for the electors of the county to show a most positive sympathy for this movement, because it was in accordance with their notions of political life and social existence. They had a firm belief in local government and desired to carry it on successfully 36 REVOLUTION. without unnecessary restrictions or burdens. Taxa.- tion without representation was to them a most un reasonable and unjust doctrine, and they were not disposed to tolerate its continued enforcement. Either they or their fathers had emigrated from Germany and settled in the county during the previous fifty years for the express purpose of enjoying civil rights, and of conducting their business, social and political affairs with as little foreign interference as possible ; and find ing that extra taxes were to be imposed upon and ex acted from them without their consent for the benefit of the King of Great Britain, and not for their own improvement or convenience, they felt impelled to ex press a decided opposition to such a proceeding. The system of militia, which had been provided for by the Assembly, was appreciated by them, and they co-operated sincerely in its establishment throughout the county. They effected an organization and re sponded to the call for troops in a willing and prompt manner. Their promptness gave them such public distinction that Bancroft, the historian, makes especial mention of it in that part of his Historj' of the United States which relates to the Revolution. This action was shown soon after the Battle of Lexington had been fought, not simply at Reading where there was a con siderable population in a small area of territory cov ering less than a square mile, but in everj' township of the county whose inhabitants were widely scattered over an extended area embracing fulh- twelve hundred square miles. The militia returns of tlie county for 1775 show the organization of seven battalions, and by July, 1775, there were at least forty companies REVOLUTION. 37 ready to answer the call for practical military duty in actual warfare. Their zeal will be more fully appre ciated when we understand that there was not a single post office in the county, and that the only means of dispatching communications was by express riders. Some opposition to this movement was shown in the county, but it did not presume to effect an organ ization in behalf of preventing the development of the sentiment for indepencence. The people who mani fested this feeling were confined to the districts where the English language was used, and on that account they were called "Tories." The property of some of these was confiscated and converted to the uses of the government in prosecuting the war. A small number of inhabitants in the county had conscientious scruples against war, and though they succeeded in holding a public meeting and forming an organization, they did not constitute a factor of any importance in creating public opinion. A slight inclination was also manifested by some men in the county to discourage the continental cur rency. Two men were arrested for doing this, but they were discharged after having publicly acknow ledged their error at Reading on January 30, 1776, begged the pardon of the community, and promised to conform thereafter to the rules and regulations that existed. It is evident that the Germans were too numerous and their sympathies for independence too strong to permit any feelings or sentiments contrary to their own to become of any recognized public influence. 38 REVOLUTION. POPULATION AND DISTRICTS OF THE COUNTY. In 1776, the territory of Berks County included not only that part which lies within the present boundary lines to the south of the Blue Mountains, but also nearly the entire area of Schuylkill County to the north, the excepted portion being about one-sixth part at the eastern end. But that section beyond the mountains was sparsely settled, the resident taxables numbering about 150, and the population about 600. The total population — as near as I can estimate it — was about 20,000, and the taxables numbered about 4000, the same number as those subject to military duty between the ages of 18 and 53 years. The estimated population of Pennsylvania then was 300,000 white people and 2000 black. The townships or districts established in the county numbered 29. They were distributed as follows : Ea.st of the Schuylkill River— 18. Manataimiy Section : Alsace, Douglass, Reading, Amity, Exeter, Rockland, Colebrookdale, Hereford, Ruscombmanor, District, Oley, Ontelaunee Section : Albany, Maidencreek, Richmond, Greenwich, Maxatawuy, Windsor. Longswamp, West of the Schuylkill River — 9. Schuylkill Section : Brecknock, Cumru, Union. Caernarvon, Robeson, Tulpehocken Section : Bern, Heidelberg, Tulpehocken. Bethel, Beyond the Blue Mountains- Brunswick and Pino Grove. -2. REVOLUTION. 39 CHAPTER III. ASSOCIATORS. At the inception of the Revolution, there were eleven counties in the Province of Pennsylvania. They were: Philadelphia, York, Bedford, Bucks, Cumberland, Northumberland, Chester, Berks, Westmoreland. Lancaster, Northampton, On June 30, 1775, the General Assembly approved of " the Association entered into by the good people of this colony (Pennsylvania) for the defense of their lives, liberties and properties;' ' decided to pay the nec essary expenses of the officers and soldiers while in active service, repelling any hostile invasion of British or other troops; and recommended the county com missioners of the several counties to ' ' immediately provide a proper number of good, new firelocks with bayonets fitted to them, cartridge boxes with 23 rounds of cartridges in every box, and knapsacks." The allotted number for Berks County was 400. Edward Biddle and Henry Christ were then the rep resentatives from Berks County, and Biddle was se lected by the Assembly as one of the Committee of Safety " for calling forth such and so many of the Associators into actual service when necessity re quires." The committee consisted of 25 members. 40 REVOLUTION. RECOMMENDATION OF CONGRESS. On July 28, 1775, the Assembly approved of the resolution of Congress, passed July i8th, which recom mended : " That all able-bodied men between 16 and 60 years of age in each colony immediately form themselves into regular companies to consist of one captain, two lieutenants, one ensign, four ser geants, four corporals, a clerk, drummer and fifer, and 68 privates. " That the officers of each company be chosen by the respective companies. "That the companies be formed into Battalions, officered with a Colonel, Lieutenant-Colonel, two Majors, and an Adjutant or Quartermaster. " That the officers above captain be appointed by the Assembly or by the Committee of Safety. "And that each soldier be furnished with a good musket that will carry an ounce ball, with a bayonet, steel ram-rod, worm priming wire with brush fitted thereto, a cutting sword or toma hawk, a cartridge box that will contain 33 rounds of cartridges, 13 flints, and a knapsack." The musket barrels were 3 ft. 8 in. long, and the bayonets 16 in. long ; the bore of the barrels of suffi cient size to carry 17 balls to the pound. COUNTY COLONELS OF ASSOCIATORS. Delegates from the eleven named counties, number ing altogether fifty-three, assembled at Philadelphia on August 19, 1775, for the purpose of adopting Art icles of Association. They were Colonels of the As sociated Battalions. The representatives from Berks County were: Edward Biddle, Daniel Brodhead, Christian Lower. Mark Bird, Baltzer Geehr, REVOLUTION. 4 1 Preamble to Articles of Association. — The preamble to the Articles of Association read as follows : "We, the officers and soldiers, engaged in the present associa tion for the defense of American liberty, being fully sensible that the strength and security of any body of men acting together, consists in just regularity, due subordination, and exact obedience to command, without which no individual can have that confi dence in the support of those about him, that is so necessary to give firmness and resolution to the whole, do voluntarily and freely, after consideration of the following articles, adopt the same as the rules by which we agree and resolve to be governed in all our military concerns and operations, until the same or any of them, shall be changed or dissolved by the Assemblj' or Provin cial Convention, or in their recess, by the Committee; of Safety, or a happy reconciliation shall take place between Great Britain and the Colonies." There were thirty-two articles which provided for the regulation of military affairs, and these articles the Associators were expected to sign. County Committee Recommends Articles. — The Com mittee of Safety in Berks County recommended the adoption of the Articles of Association, as will appear by the following letter: Rbading, January 30, 1776. At a meeting of the Standing Committee for Berks County, held this day, Mark Bird, Esq., in the chair, The Committee taking into their consideration the present state of the Association in this County, and being persuaded of the pressing necessity of being prepared for defence, do earnestly recommend it to their brethren to sign the Articles of Association formed by the House of Assembly at their last meeting; this Committee trusting that such amendments will be made at the next sitting of Assembly as will make the Association not only more effectual but more consonant to the principles of justice and equality. And afterward, at a meeting of the Committee, on the 30th of the same month. 42 REVOLUTION. Besolved, unanimously, that it is the opinion of this Committee that it will be highly requisite, in case the Assembly should not think proper to make the necessarj' amendments in the said Asso ciation, that a Provincial Convention be held for that purpose; and they do accordingly appoint — Edward Biddle, Daniel Brodhead, Valentine Eclcert, Mark Bird, Baltzer Geehr, Nicholas Lotz, Jonathan Potts, Collinson Read, Sebastian Levan, Richard Tea, to attend the said Convention in behalf of this county. By order of the Committee, Collinson Read, Secretary. REVOLUTION. 43 CHAPTER IV. * INDEPENDENCE OF THE PROVINCE. Suppression of British Authority. — On May 15, 1776, the Continental Congress adopted a resolution that recommended the total suppression of all authority under the King of Great Britain. It was as follows : Whereas, his Brittanic majesty, in conjunction with the Lords and Commons of Great Britain, has by a late Act of Parliament, excluded the inhabitants of these United Colonies from the pro tection of his crown. And Wliereaa, no answer whatever, to the humble petitions of the colonies for redress of grievances and reconciliation with Great Britain, has been, or is likely to be given, but the whole force of that kingdom, aided by foreign mercenaries, is to be ex erted for the destruction of the good people of these colonies. And Whereas, it appears absolutely irreconcilable to reason and good conscience, for the people of these colonies, now to take the oaths and affirmations necessary for the support of any govern ment, under the crown of Great Britain; and it is necessary, that the exercise of every kind of authority, under the said crown should be totally suppressed, and all the powers of government ex erted, under the authority of the people of the colonies, for the preservation of internal peace, virtue and good order, as well as for the defense of their lives, liberties and properties, against the hostile invasions and cruel depredations of their enemies; therefore, Besolved, That it be recommended to the respective assemblies and conventions of the United Colonies, where no government sufficient to the exigencies of their affairs has been hitherto es tablished, to adopt such government as shall, in the opinion of the representatives of the people, best conduce to the happiness and safety of their constituents in particular, and America in general. 44 REVOLUTION. Support of Civil Authority by the County. — A copy of this resolution having been received at Reading shortly afterward, and the people taking its import ance into serious, consideration, the Standing Commit tee of the county determined that the existing ci-vil authority should nevertheless be supported until a new government should be provided, and accordingly passed the following resolution : Reading, June 8, 1776. At a meeting of the Standing Committee of the County of Berks held this day, Mark Bird in the chair, Sesolved, That as some people have declared that no obedience ought to be paid to the civil authority, because a government will shortly be founded on the authority of the people in the room of the present government ; and as such a conduct will only serve to introduce confusion and disorder, and endanger the lives and properties of everj' individual in society, it is the opinion of this committee, and they are determined to support the same to the utmost of their abilities, that the same obedience should be paid to the civil authority as used to be paid to it, till a new Constitution shall be formed by a Provincial Convention, and commissions shall be issued by virtue of the new legislative authority for the ap pointment of courts and magistrates, to preserve the pea,ce and administer justice to the people ; and then the authority of the present courts and magistrates will cease of course. By order of the Committee, Collinson Read, Secretary. PROVINCIAL CONFERENCE. Pursuant to the foregoing resolution of Congress, a Provincial Conference was held in Carpenters' Hall, at Philadelphia, from June i8th to June 25th, 1776, which was composed of deputies from the several coun ties of the Province. The deputies from Philadelphia REVOLUTION. 45 had issued a circular letter to the Committees of the several counties, fixing a time and place for the pro posed meeting, and suggesting the appointment of deputies. Deputies from the County. — The representatives from Berks County were : Col. Jocob Morgan, Dr. Bodo Otto, Col. Valentine Eckert, Col. Henry Haller, Mr. Benjamin Spyker, Col. Nicholas Lotz, Col. Mark Bird, Col. Daniel Hunter, Capt. Joseph Hiester, Mr. Charles Shoemaker. I The Conference determined that a Convention should be called for the purpose of forming a new government in this province on the authority of the people only, fixed the qualifications of Associators and of the members of the Convention, and asked each county to send eight delegates. The election of the delegates was ordered to be held on Monday, July 8, 1776, and the delegates were directed to assemble at Philadelphia on Monday, July 15, 1776. Address of Conference. — The following Address was then issued : To the people of Pennsylvania : Friends and Countrymen : In obedience to the power we de rived from you, we have flxed upon a mode of electing a con vention, to form a government for the Province of Pennsylvania, under the authority of the people. Divine Providence is about to grant you a favor, which few people have ever enjoyed before, the privilege of choosing depu ties to form a government under which you are to live. We need not inform you of the importance of the trust you are about to commit to them ; your liberty, safety, happiness and everything that posterity will hold dear to them to the end of time, will depend upon their deliberations. It becomes you, therefore, to choose such 46 REVOLUTION. persons only, to act for you in the ensuing convention, as are dis tinguished for wisdom, integrity and a firm attachment to the liberties of this province, as well as to the liberties of the United Colonies in general. In order that 3'our deputies may know your sentiments as fully as possible, upon the subject of government, we beg that you would convey to them your wishes and opinions upon that head immediately after their election. We have experienced an unexpected unanimity in our councils and we have the pleasure of observing a growing unanimity among the people of the province. AVe beg, that this brotherly spirit may be cultivated, and that you would remember that the present unsettled state of the province, requires that you should show forbearance, charity and moderation to each other. We beg that you would endeavor to remove the prejudices of the weak and ignorant, respecting the proposed change in our gov ernment, and assure them that it is absolutely necessary to secure property, liberty, and the sacred rights of conscience, to every in dividual in the province. The season of the year, and the exigencies of our colony, re quire dispatch in the formation of a regular government. You will not therefore be surprised at our fixing the day for the elec tion of deputies so early as the Sth of next July. We wish you success in your attempts to establish and perpet uate your liberties, and praj' God to take j'ou under his special protection. Signed by unanimous order of the Conference, Thomas M'Kean, President. Declaration of Independe^tce. — And the following Declaration of Independence of the Province was agreed to : Whereas, George the Third, King of Great Britain, etc., in vio lation of the principles of the British constitution, and of the laws of justice and humanity, hath by an accumulation of oppressions, unparalleled in history, excluded the inhabitants of this, with other American Colonies, from his protection. And Whereas, he hath paid no regard to any of our numerous and dutiful petitions for a redress of our complicated grievances, but hath lately purchased foreign troops to assist in enslaving us; REVOLUTION. 47 and hath excited the savages of this countrj' to carry on a war against us, as also che negroes to imbrue their hands in the blood of their masters, in a manner unpracticed by civilized nations, and hath lately insulted our calamities, by declaring that he will show us no mercy until he has reduced us. And Whereas, the obligations of allegiance, (being reciprocal between a king and his subjects) are now dissolved, on the side of the colonists, by the despotism of the king, insomuch that it now appears that loyalty to him is treason against the good people of this country. And Whereas, not only the parliament, but there is reason to believe too many of the people of Great Britain, have concurred in the aforesaid arbitrary and unjust proceedings against us. And Whereas, the public virtue of this colony, (so essential to its liberty and happiness,) must be endangered by a future politi cal union with, or dependence upon a crown, and nation so lost to justice, patriotism and magnanimity. We, the deputies of the people of Pennsylvania, assembled in full Provincial Conference, for forming a plan for executing the resolve of congress, of the 15th May last, for suppressing all Au thority in this province, derived from the crown of Great Britain, and for establishing a government upon the authority of the peo ple only, now in this public manner, in behalf of ourselves, and with the approbation, consent and authority of our constituents, unanimously declare our willingness to concur in a vote of the congress, declaring the United Colonies free and independent states ; providing the forming the government, and the regulation of the internal police of this colony, be always reserved to the people of the said colony ; and we do further call upon the nations of Europe, and appeal to the great arbiter and governor of the empires of the world, to witness for us, that this declaration did not originate in ambition, or in an impatience of lawful authority; but that we were driven to it in obedience to the flrst principles of nature, by the oppressions and cruelties of the aforesaid king and parliament of Great Britain ; as the only possible measure that was left us, to preserve and establish our liberties, and to transmit them inviolate to posterity. Address for Flying Camp. — In obedience to the resolutions of Congress of the 3d and 4th of June, 1776, this Conference also made provisions for raising 48 REVOLUTION. 4500 militia towards establishing a "flying camp" of 10,000 men in the Middle Colonies, and caused the following remarkable address to the Associators to be . issued : To the Associators of Pennsylvania : "Gentlemen: The only design of our meeting together was to put an end to our own power in the province, by fixing upon a plan for calling a convention, to form a government under the authority of the people. But the sudden and unexpected separation of the late Assembly has compelled us to undertake the execution of a resolve of Congress for calling forth 4500 of the militia of this province, to join the militia of the neighboring colonies, to form a camp for our immediate protection. We presume onlj' to rec ommend the plan we have formed to you, trusting that, in a case of so much consequence, your love of virtue and zeal for liberty will supply the want of authority delegated to us expressly for that purpose. " We need not remind you that you are now furnished with new motives to animate and support your courage. You are not about to contend against the power of Great Britain, in order to displace one set of villains to make room for another. Your arms will not be enervated in the day of battle with the reflection that 3-ou are to risk your lives or shed j'our blood for a British tj-rant ; or that 3'our posterity will have your work to do over again. You are about to contend for permanent freedom, to be supported by a government which will be derived from yourselves and which will have for its object, not the emolument of one man or class of men only, but the safety, liberty and happiness of eveiy individ ual in the community. We call upon you, therefore, by the re spect and obedience which are due to the authority of the United Colonies, to concur in this important measure. The present cam paign will probably decide the fate of America. It is now in your power to immortalize your names by mingling your achieve ments with the events of the year 1770 — a year which, we hope, will be famed in the annals of history to the end of time, for es tablishing upon a lasting foundation the liberties of one-quarter of the globe. "Remember the honor of our colony is at stake. Should you desert the common cause at the present juncture, the glory you REVOLUTION. 49 have acquired bj' your former exertions of strength and virtue will be tarnished ; and our friends and brethren, who are now ac quiring laurels in the most remote parts of America, will reproach us and blush to own themselves natives or inhabitants of Penn sylvania. "But there are other motives before you. Your houses, your flelds, the legacies of your ancestors, or the dear-bought fruits of your own industry, and your liberty, now urge you to the field. These cannot plead with you in vain, or we might point out to J'OU, further, your wives, your children, your aged fathers and mothers, who now look up to you for aid, and hope for salvation in this day of calamity only from the instrumentality of your swords. "Remember the name of Pennsylvania — Think of your ances tors and of j'our posterity. "Signed bj- an unanimous order of the conference, "THOTtAS M'Kean, President. "June 35, 1776." DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE BY CONGRESS. The "Declaration of Independence" was passed by the Continental Congress late on the afternoon of July 4, 1776, and ordered to be printed. A resolution was adopted at the same time, directing copies to be sent to the several Assemblies and Committees of Safety, and to the several commanding officers of the Continental troops, and that it be proclaimed in each of the United States and at the head of the army. There were seventy representatives accredited from the several Colonies to the Continental Congress. Of these, twenty-two did not sign the Declaration of In dependence for various reasons. Among this number was Edward Biddle, and the reason explaining the omission is given as follows in the History of Phil adelphia.^ (1884) : 50 REVOLUTION. "Edward Biddle, of Philadelphia, died during the session of a lingering disease, which probably disabled him at the time of the Declaration." This statement is erroneous in two particulars. Biddle was not of Philadelphia, and though he had met with an accident before 1776, which culminated in serious illness, he did not die until 1779. He at tended the meetings of the Committee of Safety of Pennsylvania during January, 1776. In 1778, he was one of the Representatives from the county to the Assembly, and that body selected him as one of seven members to Congress. Declaration Read in the County. — In pursuance of the resolution of Congress, the State Board of Safety addressed a letter to the Committee of Berks County on the 6th of July, 1776, enclosing a copy of the Decla- Tation of Independence, and directing it to be read on Monday, July 8th, at 12 o'clock noon, at the place where the election of delegates was to be held. This was done by Henry Vanderslice, the sheriff" of the ¦county, on that day at the Court House on Penn Square, the bell having been rung earnestly before hand, as elsewhere, to call the people together so that they should learn the comprehensive significance of that important and courageous public document in behalf of political freedom and representative govern ment. CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF THE PROVINCE. Delegates from the County. — According to the di rection of the Provincial Conference, the electors of REVOLUTION. 51 Berks County held an election on Monday, July 8, 1776, at the Court House, in Reading, and chose as their representatives the following eight prominent men : Jacob Morgan, Benjamin Spyker, Charles Shoemaker, Gabriel Hiester, Daniel Hunter, Thomas Jones. John Lesher, Valentine Eckert, On July 15, following, they attended the Conven tion at Philadelphia and participated in the formation of a Constitution for the government of the Province. The labors of the Convention were concluded on September 28, 1776, and then all the delegates pres ent subscribed the Constitution which they had adopted. All the delegates from Berks County sub scribed their names, excepting John Lesher and Dan iel Hunter. On July 23, 1776, the Constitutional Convention elected a Council of Safety to discharge the executive duties of the State government, dissolving in this manner the Committee of Safety. This Council was composed of twenty-five members, among them Dan iel Hunter, of Berks County. The Preamble and Declaration of Rights being so elevated in sentiment and so admirable in construction, I introduce them in this connection. John Lesher represented Berks County in the committee of eleven, (one from each county) who were appointed to draft the frame of government. Preamble. Whereas, all government ought to be instituted and supported tor the security and protection of the community as such, and to enable the individuals who compose it to enjoy their natural 52 REVOLUTION. rights, and the other blessings which the author of existence has bestowed upon man ; and whenever these great ends of government are not obtained, the people have a right by common consent to change it, and take such measures as to them may appear neces sary, to promote their safety and happiness. And Whereas, the inhabitants of this commonwealth have, in consideration of protection only, heretofore acknowledged alle giance to the king of Great Britain, and the said king has not only withdrawn that protection, but commenced and still continues to carry on with unabated vengeance, a most cruel and unjust war against them, emplojdng therein not only the troops of Great Britain, but foreign mercenaries, savages and slaves, for the avowed purpose of reducing them to a total and abject submission to the despotic domination of the British Parliament, (with many other acts of tyrannj' more fully set forth in the declaration of congress) whereby all allegiance and fealty to the said king and his successors are dissolved and at an end, and all power and au thority derived from him ceased in these colonies. And Whereas, it is absolutely necessary for the Avelfare and safety of the inhabitants of said colonies, that they be henceforth free and independent states, and that just, permanent and proper forms of government exist in everj' part of them, derived from, and founded on the authority of the people only, agreeable to the direction of the honorable American Congress. We, the representatives of the freemen of Pennsylvania, in general convention met, for the express purpose of framing such a government, confessing the goodness of the great governor of the universe, (who alone knows to what degree of earth!}' happiness mankind may attain by perfecting the arts of government) in permitting the people of this state, by common consent and with out violence, deliberatelj' to form for themselves, such just rules as thej' shall think best for governing their future society ; and being fully convinced, that it is our indispensible duty to estab lish such original principles of government, as will best promote the general happiness of the people of this state and their poster ity, and provide for future improvements, without partiality for, or prejudice against, any particular class, sect or denomination of men whatsoever, do, by virtue of the authority vested in us by our constituents, ordain, declare and establish the following dec laration of rights, and frame of government, to be the constitu tion of this commonwealth, and to remain in force therein for REVOLUTION. 53 ever unaltered, except in such articles as shall hereafter, on ex perience, be found to require improvements, and which shall by the same authority of the people, fairly delegated, as this frame of government directs, be amended or improved for the more ef fectual obtaining and securing the great end and design of all government, herein before mentioned. Declaration of Rights. 1. That all men are born equally free and independent, and have certain natural, inherent and unalienable rights, amongst which are the enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety. 3. That all men have a natural and unalienable right to wor ship Almighty God, according to the dictates of their own con sciences and understanding, and that no man ought, or of right can be compelled to attend any religious worship, or erect or sup port any place of worship, or maintain any ministry, contrary to, or against his own free will and consent ; nor can any man who acknowledges the being of a God, be justly deprived or abridged of any civil right as a citizen, on account of his religious senti ments, or peculiar mode of religious worship ; ^nd that no author ity can, or ought to be vested in, or assumed by any power what ever, that shall in any case interfere with, or in any manner control the right of conscience in the free exercise of religious worship. 3. That the people of this state have the sole, exclusive and in herent right of governing and regulating the internal police of the same. 4. That all power being originally inherent in, and consequently derived from the people ; therefore all officers of government, whether legislative or executive, are their trustees and servants, and at all times accountable to them. 5. That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the com mon benefit, protection and security of the people, nation or com munity ; and not for the particular emolument or advantage of any single man, family or set of men, who are a part only of that community ; and that the community hath an indubitable, un alienable and indefeasible right to reform, alter or abolish govern ment, in such manner as shall be by that community judged, most conducive to the public weal. 54 REVOLUTION. G. That those who are employed in the legislative and executive business of the state, may be restrained from oppression, the peo ple have a right, at such periods as they may think proper, to reduce their public officers to a private station, and supply the vacancies bj' certain and regular elections. 7. That all elections ought to be free and that all free men, having a sufficient evident common interest with and attachment to the community, have a right to elect officers or to be elected into office. 8. That every member of society hath a right to be protected in the enjoyment of life, liberty and property ; and therefore is bound to contribute his proportion towards the expense of that protection, and yield his personal service when necessary, or an equivalent thereto ; but no part of a man's property can be justh- taken from him or applied to public uses, without his own con sent or that of his legal representatives ; nor can any man who is conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms be justly compelled thereto if he will paj' such equivalent, nor are the people bound by any laws but such as they have in like manner assented to, for their common good. 9. That in all prosecutions for criminal offenses, a man hath a right to be heard by himself and his council ; to demand the- cause and nature of his accusation ; to be confronted with the witnesses, to call for evidence in his favor, and a speedy public trial by an impartial jury of the country, without the unanimous consent of which jury he cannot be found guilty ; nor can he be compelled to give evidence against himself ; nor can anj' man be justly deprived of his liberty, except by the laws of the land or the judgment of his peers. 10. That the people have a right to hold themselves, their houses, papers and possessions free from search and seizure ; and therefore warrants, without oaths or affirmations first made af fording a sufficient foundation for them, and whereby any officer or messenger may be commanded or required to search suspected places, or to seize any person or persons, his or their property not particularly described, are contrary to that right, and ought not to be granted. 11. That in controversies respecting property, and in suits be tween man and man, the parties have a right to trial by jury, which ought to be held sacred. REVOLUTION. 55, 13. That the people have a right to freedom of speech and of writing and publishing their sentiments ; therefore the freedom of the press ought not to be restrained. 13. That the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves, and the state ; and as standing armies in the time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up, and that the military should be kept under strict subordination to,. and governed by the civil power. 14. That a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles and a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, industry and frugality, are absolutely necessary to preserve the blessings of libertj' and keep a government. The people ought therefore to pay particular attention to these points in the choice of officers and representatives, and have a right to exact a due and constant regard to them from their legislatures and magistrates, in the making and executing such laws as are necessary for the good government of the state. 15. That all men have a natural and inherent right to emigrate from one state to another that will receive them, or to form a new state in vacant countries, or in such countries as they can pur chase, whenever they think that therebj' they may promote their own happiness. 16. That the people have a right to assemble together to consult for their common good, to instruct their representatives, and to applj' to the legislature for redress of grievances by address, peti tion or remonstrance. It were well if the foregoing sentiments could be impressed upon the people, so as to lead them to fully appreciate their excellence and adaptation for the gen eral welfare. Their preservation is dependent upon the uniform elevation of the people through industry, education and equality, under the guidance of a frater nal spirit. Manhood, citizenship and patriotism, with social impulses towards the prosperity and peace of the people, are superior to mechanical progress and the riches, envy and strife which it develops in certain channels and classes, and they are therefore worthy of serious public consideration. 56 REVOLUTION. CHAPTER V. :\IILITIA SYSTEM. The Convention of 1776, in framing the first Con stitution of Pennsylvania, made the following provi sion for the establishment of a military system : "The freemen of this commonwealth and their sons shall be trained and armed for its defense under such regulations, restric tions and exceptions as the General Assembly shall bj' law direct, preserving always to the people the right of choosing their Colo nels and all commissioned officers under that rank." In pursuance of this provision, the General Assem bly established the necessary regulations, and through them the county of Berks, under the direction of the officer designated thereby, called a " Lieutenant," -with the assistance of " Sub-Lieutenants," was enabled to supply promptly and successfully all the orders made by the State government for troops during the progress of the Revolution. Previous to this system, the military affairs were governed by Articles of Association. The men who associated together for purposes of defence were com monly known as "Associators," and those who acted in opposition, either openly or secretly, were called " Non-Associators." By the following returns, it is apparent that the men in the county, subject to military dut>-, appre ciated the necessity of organization and co-operated REVOLUTION. 57 earnestly with the Executive Council in making the law effective. The persons chosen for lieutenant-col onels and majors of the seven battalions for 1775, at the beginning of the Revolution, represent the best class of taxpayers that the county possessed. They were all prominent men and stood at the head of bus iness, political and social affairs. This selection ex hibits, not only the discrimination which the people exercised, but also the respect which they had for qualification and influence. The subsequent returns until 1783 show a similar selection of men. COUNTY RETURNS FOR 1 775. The following officers were chosen for the several battalions of the Associators of Berks County ibr the year 1775-76. It is the earliest military record of this county that I could find relating to the Revolution. The company rosters were not published in that con nection : 1st Battalion — Central Section. Lieut.-Col., Henry Haller. Maj., Gabriel Hiester. £nd Battalion — Southern Section. Lieut.-Col., Mark Bird. Maj., John Jones. 3rd Battalion — Central Section. Lieut.-Col., Nicholas Lotz. Maj., John Old. 4th Battalion — Northern Section. Lieut.-Col., Balser Geehr. Maj., Michael Lindemuth. Sth Battalion — Western Section. Lieut.-Col., John Patton. Maj., John Thornburgh. 6th Battalion — Eastern Section. Lieut.-Col., Daniel Hunter. Maj., Conrad Leffler. 7th Battalion — Northeastern Section. Lieut.-Col., Sebastian Levan. Maj., Samuel Ely. 58 REVOLUTION. COUNTY RETURNS FOR 1 776. Seven battalions were organized in the county, as will appear by the delegates sent to the election at Lancaster, July 4, 1776, for two brigadier-generals, but the complete returns for 1776 have not yet been discovered. Eight companies of the County Militia were paid for subsistence during the Summer of 1776. They were as follows : Captains. £. sh. d. Captains. £. sh. d. Daniel Deturk, 1 3 6 George Will, 1 18 8 Jacob Moser, 16 15 5 John Old, 3 4 Nicholas Scheffer, 1 3 4 Moyer, 1 13 4 John Soder, 3 3 8 Stephen Crumrine, 15 Three companies were on duty at South Amboy, in New Jersey, in August, 1776, commanded by Michael Wolf, George Miller and Michael Furrer. These eleven companies are all that I could find for this year, of which any mention was made. County Delegates to Lancaster Convention. — A pub lic meeting was held at Lancaster on July 4, 1776, for the purpose of electing two brigadier-generals to com mand the battalions and forces in Pennsylvania. The meeting consisted of the officers and privates of fifty- three battalions of the Associators. A full ratio of men was sent by the militia of Berks Count)-. The following delegates represented the countj- at the meeting : 1st Battalion : Officers — Major, Gabriel Hiester; Lieut., Philip Cremer ; privates, .Tohn Hartman, Peter Filbert. Snd Battalion ; Officers — Col., Mark Bird ; Major, John Jones ; privates, David Morgan, Benjamin Tolbert. 3rd Battalion : Officers— Lieut.-Col., Nicholas Lotz; Captain, George Riehm; privates, Henry Spohn, Matthias Wenrioh. REVOLUTION. 59 4th Battalion : Officers— Major, Michael Lindemuth ; Captain, George May ; private, Michael Moser. Sth Battalion : Officers — Col., John Patton ; Lieut.-Col., John Rice ; privates, Jacob Seltzer, Christian Winter. Oth Battalion : Officers — Major, Conrad Leffler; Lieut., John Miller ; privates, John Hill, Henry Lark. 7th Battalion : Officers — Col., Sebastian Levan; Adj., Samuel Ely ; privates, Philip Wisters, Casper Smeck. Colonel Mark Bird, of the 2nd Battalion, was one of the judges of the election. Daniel Roberdeau was elected the first brigadier-general, and James Ewing, the second. Mark Bird received seven votes. Eight candidates were placed in nomination. COUNTY RETURNS FOR 1 777. Colonel Jacob Morgan and his sub-lieutenants met at Reading on April 25, 1777, for the purpose of receiving returns of the inhabitants of Berks County, between the ages of 18 and 53 years. The number then returned was about 4000. These were arranged in six districts, and meetings were ordered to be held on the 5th and 6th of May following, for the purpose of electing officers and forming companies. Morgan reported that he had forwarded to the Execu tive Council an exact list of the field officers, cap tains, subalterns and court-martial men, comprising the six battalions of the Berks County militia, or one battalion for each district. This list appears in the Pennsylvania Associators., vol. 2, pp. 257 to 276. The several battalions were returned on May 16, 1777. I have added the sections of the county showing where the companies were organized. 6o REVOLUTION. ist Battalion — Eastern Section. Col., Daniel Hunter, Oley. Lt.-Col., John Guldin, Oley. Chaplain, Jacob Michael. Maj., John Cunius, Oley. Q. M., Isaac Feather, Reading. Adj., Philip Bertolet, Oley. Surgeon, Daniel Welcher. 1st Co. — Hereford. Mathias Wick, Christopher Folk, Charles Geiger, Henry Reiff, John Pott, Jacob Heflner. Captain.1st Lieut. Snd Lieut. Ensign. Court Martial Snd Go. — Colebrookdale. Stephen Crumrine, Henry Knouse, Isaiah Davis, Jacob Gerver, Mathias Rhoads, Baltzer Trout. 3rd Co. — District. Sebastian Lentz, Jacob Rhoads, Adam Heiter, Henry Hess, Baltzer Beam, Peter Gabel. Captain.1st Lieut. 3nd Lieut. Ensign.Court Martial Captain. 1st Lieut. 3nd Lieut. Ensign.Court Martial .5th Co. — Colebrookdale. Jacob Hill, George Schall, John Betz, Joseph Delaplane, Philip Mathias, Jacob Antey. 6th Co. — Ruscombmanor. Peter Wanner, Henry Strauch, Adam Hamscher, Henrj- Schurtz, Elias Wagner, Henry Hess. 7th Co. — Oley. Daniel Reiff. Daniel Leinbach, Philip Reiff, Peter Scheffer, Daniel Schneider, John Scheffer. 4.th Co.— Oley. George Focht, John Stapleton, Jacob Griesemer, John Yoder, Daniel Levan, George Yoder. Captain. 1st Lieut. Snd Lieut. Ensign. Court Martial men. Sth Co.— Hereford. David Strause, Jacob Rickstein, .Tohn Miller, John Roeder, Henry Rauch, George Moll. REVOLUTION. 6l 2nd Battalion — Northeastern Section. Col., Daniel Udree, Oley. Lt.-Col., Jacob Boyer, Oley. Surgeon, John Umstead, Union. Maj., John Huy. Surg. Mate, Thos. Kerlin, Amity. Adj., George Riehm, Cumru., Q. M., Conrad Foose, Reading. 1st Co. — Longsioamp. Charles Crouse, Philip Hertz, Nicholas Mertz, Christian Kercher, Casper Seibert, Adam Helwig. Captain.1st Lieut. Snd Lieut. Ensign,Court Martial Sth Co. — Maxatawny. Casper Smeck, Jacob Grim, Jacob Zimmerman, Jacob Sigfried, Joseph Gross, John Beaver. Snd Co. — Rockland. Peter Smith, George Roap, Michael Ea}-re, John Kreamer, Henry George, George Lej-e. 3d Co. — Richmond. Jacob Rothermel, Jacob Dreibelbis, Christopher Denn, Daniel Ely, Jacob Wanner, George Kelchner. 4th Co. — Maxatawny. George Kemp, Jacob Levan, Michael Peifer, Jacob Schweyer, Philip Geehr, Peter Scherer. Captain. 1st Lieut. Snd Lieut. Ensign. Court Martial Captain. 1st Lieut. Snd Lieut. Ensign. Court Martial Captain. 1st Lieut. Snd Lieut. Ensign. 6t?i Co. — Richmond. Michael Voyge, Henry Adam, John Feglej-, John Lesher, Frederick Leiby, Valentine Hoffman. 7th Co. — Maidencreek. Abraham Huy, Christian Bearringstein, John Weidenhammer, Christian Burkhart, Jacob Stein, Jacob Rhaun, Sth Co. — Longswamp. Henry Egner, Henry Fegley, John Trice, Martin Royer, Court Martial Philip Deal, men. Jacob Collman. 62 REVOLUTION. jrd Battalion — Northern Section. Col., Michael Lindemuth, Bern. Lt.-Col., George May, Windsor. Maj., Martin Kercher, Windsor. 1st Co. — Pine Orove. Jacob Wetstein, George Brouch, Ludwig Herring, Henry Wetstein, Conrad Sheffer, Rudolph Buzzard. 2nd Co. — Brunswick. Conrad Minich, John Graul, John Stout, Philip Boning, Gideon Moyer, John Crawford. 3d Co.— Bern. Jacob Shraedel, George Albright, George Kaufman, Adam Klauser, Christian Albright, John Knevel. 4th Co. — Bern. Sebastian Emrich, Francis Umbehacker, George Ludwig, George Moyer, George Belleman, Anthony Kershner. Captain. 1st Lieut. Snd Lieut. Ensign. Court Martial Captain. 1st Lieut. Snd Lieut. Ensign. Court Martial Captain.1st Lieut. Snd Lieut. Ensign. Court Martial Captain. 1st Lieut. Snd Lieut. Ensign. ¦5th Co. — Bern. John Soder, Jacob Frantz, John Epler, Philip Fox, Jacob Frevberger, John Epler, Sr. 6th Go. — Windsor. Jacob Shadle, Charles Siegfried, William Williamson, George Reber, George Hower, Eberhard Shappel. 7th Go. — Bern. Daniel Will, Jacob Meicksel, Henry Kalbach, Abraham Luckenbill, Peter Focht, Peter Baldy. Sth Co. — Windsor. Ferdinand Ritter, Michael Smith, George Adam, Jacob Stapleton, Court Martial Jacob Tenant, men. John Brobst. REVOLUTION. 4th Battalion — Central Section. Col., Nicholas Lotz, Reading. Lt.-Col., Joseph Hiester, Reading. Maj., Peter Decker, Reading. 1st Go. — Reading. Conrad Geist, Philip Ruppert, Charles Gobin, John Kidd, Peter Feather, George Gardner. 2nd Co. — Beading. John Reitmyer, Michael Bush, Christian Grouse, John Burkhard, Jacob Groff, Nicholas Scherer. 3d Go. — Alsace. Daniel DeTurck, Paul Feger, Jacob Kissinger, Henry Schneider, Isaac Levan, John Baum. 4th Co. — Reading. Peter Nagel, Paul Kerper, Daniel Grove, Joseph Colier, Baltzer Fornewalt, Henry Wolf. Captain.1st Lieut. • Snd Lieut. Ensign.Court Martial Captain. 1st Lieut. Snd Lieut. Ensign.Court Martial Captain.1st Lieut. 3nd Lieut. Ensign. Court Martial Captain. 1st Lieut. 2nd Lieut. Ensign. Court Martial Sth Co. — Reading. George Riehm, Henry Focht, Thomas Atkinson, John Wentzel, Jacob Koch, William Hottenstein. 6th Co. — Heidelberg. Conrad Eckert, Adam Hain, Peter Young, Mathias Wenrich, Peter Kuhl, Simpson Hain. 7th Co. — Cumru. Sebastian Miller, Adam Ruth, John Gernant, John Ruth, Michael Ruth, Peter Fisher. Sth Go. — Cumru. Philip Krick, Philip Spohn, Michael Moyer, John Bullman, Henry Spohn, Joshua Evans. 64 REVOLUTION. ^th Battalion — Southern Section. Col., Jacob Weaver, Amity. Lt.-Col., Mathias Rhoads, Amity. Maj., George Lorah, Amity. Isl Go. — Union. Thomas Parrj-, William Haj'S, George Kerston, George Ax, John Umstead, John Wagner. 2nd Go. — Robeson. William Lewis, Adam Beard, Richard Millard, John Hahn, Adam Scheirer, Herman Umstead. 3rd Co. — Exeter. John Bishop, Mathias Herner, John Ludwig, John Thompson, Adam Young, Nicholas Herner. 4th Co. — Alsace. Adam Alstatt, John Wagner, Mathias Patterner, Paul Derst, Abraham Levan, John Hartman, Captain.1st Lieut. Snd Lieut. Ensign. Court Martial men. Captain. 1st Lieut. 3nd Lieut. Ensign. Court Martial men. Captain.1st Lieut. Snd Lieut. Ensign. Court Martial men. Captain. 1st Lieut. Snd Lieut. Ensign.Court Martial Sth Go.^Amity. Jacob Rhoads, Joseph Sands, Jacob Weaver, Daniel Ludwig, Daniel Winder, Henry Haffa. Gth Co. — Douglass. George Bucher, Solomon Mathews, Michael Stophlet. Jacob Keely, Peter Meffert, John Swineheart. 7th Co. — Robeson. Joseph Davis, Thomas Hamilton, David Edwards, George Glass, Paul Geiger, Casper Straub. StJi Co. — Caernartcon. David Morgan, John Robinson, Joseph Talbot, Jacob Finfrock, James Ross, Henvv Meuges. REVOLUTION. 65 6th Battalion — JVestcrn Section. Col., Henry Spyker, Tul'hock'n. Lt.-Col., George Miller, " Maj., Michael Furrer, Adj., Pred'k Ernst, Tul'hook'n. Q. M., George Lechner, " Surgeon, Philip Finkel, " 1st Co. — Heidelberg. Sth Co.— Tulpehocken. John Lesher, Captain. Michael Bretz, Isaac Depuy, 1st Lieut. Bernhard Zimmerman, John Anspach, Snd Lieut. Peter Bressler, Valentine Reed, Ensign. Peter Smith, Martin Stupp, Court Martial John Stone, .Tacob Weiser. men. Peter Smith, Snd Co.— Bethel. 6th Co. — Thilpehocken. George Batdorff, Captain. Henry Weaver, Henry Batdorff, 1st Lieut. John Scheffer, Jacob Rehrer, Snd Lieut. Henry Koch, Tobias Bheam, Ensign. Jacob Knoll, Leonard Swartz, Court Martial Adam Emrich, Nicholas Ketner. men. Valentine Moyer. 3rd Co. — Tulpehocken. 7th Go. — Tulpehocken. Henry Shepler, Captain. Jacob Kremer, Christopher Kern, 1st Lieut. Jacob Rehrer, John Riegel, Snd Lieut. Daniel Hoffman, George Loos, Ensign. George Stout, Nicholas Hawk, Court Martial Michael Kehl, John Foust, men. George Berger. 4th Co. — Heidelberg. Sth Go.— Heidelberg. Conrad Weiser, Captain. Philip Filbert, Daniel Womelsdorf, 1st Lieut. Philip Moyer, Henry Walter, Snd Lieut. Francis Artellia, George Gensemer, Ensign. Leonard Zerbe, Jacob Seltzer, Court Martial Henry Knopp, George Brown. men. Samuel Boyer. Commissions were forwarded to Col. Jacob Morgan for the foregoing six battalions June 14, 1777, by Tim othy Matlack, Secretary of the Executive Council. 66 REVOLUTION. NEW MILITIA SYSTEM PROVIDED. After the foregoing returns had been made, the As sembly deemed it necessary to provide a new militia system, because the "Associators" had lost their ef fectiveness. Shortly after the Battle of Princeton whole companies deserted. In this behalf a law was passed on June 13, 1777. Oath of Allegiance. — One of the first requirements was the taking of an oath of allegiance which had to be done before July i, 1777. This was allowing only seventeen days, but in this time its provisions had be come thoroughly known in Berks County. The time for deliberation or hesitation had passed, and prompt action was necessary. The preamble and oath, provided by the said Act, were as follows : " Whereas, From sordid or mercenary motives, or other causes inconsistent with the happiness of a free and independent people, sundry persons have withheld, or may j-et be induced to withhold, their service or allegiance from the Commonwealth of Pennsylva nia as a free and independent State, as declared by Congress. " And Whereas, Sundry other persons in their several capacities have, at the risk of their lives and fortunes, or both, rendered great and eminent services in defence and support of the said in dependence, and may yet continue to do the same, and as both these sorts of persons remain at this time mixed, and in some measure undistinguished from each other, and the disaffected de riving undeserved service from the faithful and well-affected. "And Whereas, Allegiance and protection are reciprocal, and those who will not bear the former are not or ought not to be en titled to the benefits of the latter. "Therefore, be it enacted, etc., That all white male inhabitants n County Jail at Reading, 5th and Washington streets, 1770 to 18 156 REVOLUTION. June 1, 1779. — A letter was addressed by Col. Henry Haller to the Executive Council, enclosing sundry papers respecting the prisoners at Reading, and the disturbances between them and the inhabitants of the town. These papers were ordered to be sent to the Board of War with the request that the said prisoners be sent to some other place. By a letter from the Secretary of the Board of War to the Executive Council on July 19, 1780, it would appear that there were then only about 100 prisoners of war at Reading. At that time. Col. Henry Haller was the "Commissary of Prisoners" at Reading, and he complained of the great scarcity of provisions. This must refer only to those in the town, not near by. Geist's Company on Guard Duty. The following detachment of Capt. Conrad Geist's Company, of the 6th Battalion of County Militia was detailed to guard the prisoners while in the Reading Jail from which they had attempted to break out, and also while they were being conducted from Reading to Lancaster. This was in 1776 : Ensign. Jacob Stehly. Matthias Babb. Peter Custard. Christian Deringer. Christopher Diem. George Donnelly. Paul Ege. George Eisenbeis. Isaac Ermold. Captain. Conrad Geist. Sergeants. George Gertner. AViUiam Shener. Privates. Peter Feather. Conrad Fesig. Peter Fesig. Christopher Fisher. John Fister. George Fry. Jesse Grinding. .Tohn Hiener. George Houser. George Jaeger. Pliilip Klinger. AViUiam Knorr. Matthias Leib. " Abraham Levan. Daniel McCoy. Dewalt Miller. REVOLUTION. 1 57 John Miller. Zacharias Rexroad. James Simpson. Frederick Nagel. Christian Setley. John Snyder. Philip Nagel. Henry Setley. Henry AVolf. Jacob Petre. Christian Shreffler. HESSIAN PRISONERS. In 1775, the King of Great Britain obtained by treaty from the German Princes 17,000 men for the purpose of sending them to America to assist in sub duing the American Colonies. These men were sent early in 1776. Many of them, (Hessians) were taken prisoners at the Battle of Trenton on December 26, 1776, and conveyed to Lancaster. The Continental troops then took the following prisoners, arms, etc. : 750 Hessians, i lieutenant- colonel, 2 majors, 4 captains, 15 subalterns, 3 stand ards, 6 brass field pieces and near 1000 stand of arms. Two days afterward, Gen'l Washington commanded them to be forwarded to Lancaster. The following letter was addressed to Daniel Cly- mer, Esq., at Lancaster, in 1777, by Joseph Nourn, from Philadelphia, in reference to the removal of pris oners from that place to Reading : "The Board have directed me to write to AViUiam Atlee, Deputy Commissarj' of Prisoners, to whom you'll please to render all the assistance in your power in the removal of the Prisoners of War from Lancaster towards Reading and Lebanon. Congress having just been informed by Express that the Enemy are landing in Maryland above Baltimore, & its being past a doubt the rescuing their Prisoners & the destruction of our Stores are the objects they have in view. On this important occasion, anything in your power., the Board are well satisfied will be done. You'll please to have an eye to the Prisoners at York, & if Mr. Atlee can do the Business by himself at Lancaster, it is the desire of the Board you proceed thither, & the Committee are hereby earnestly re- 158 REVOLUTION. quested to furnish such a number of Militia as shall put it out of the power of the Prisoners to effect an escape. AVe are unac quainted with the number of Prisoners at York; you will, there fore, act as your own good sense may dictate." Some of these prisoners were afterward stationed at Reading. The first location in the town was in the southern section. The exact place was along the Schuylkill a short distance below the ferry, where the " Lancaster Bridge " is now situated. After remain ing in that locality several years, they were removed to the southern declivity of Penn's Mount. This re moval was caused by the frequent disturbances which arose between the prisoners and the citizens of the town. On June 27, 1781, President Reed wrote to Valen tine Eckert, ' ' that it was the desire that the prisoners should be encamped in huts at some small distance from Reading, where wood and water were convenient ; that Colonel Morgan had mentioned a piece of ground which had belonged to the proprietaries, which would be convenient and proper." Three persons were ap pointed to select a location — Valentine Eckert, Lieu tenant of Berks County ; Maj. Bayley and Col. Wood, of Lancaster. On the 17th of July, Col. Wood wrote to President Reed, ' ' that he could not decide where to locate the prisoners ; that certain persons, who thought they did not have a legal title to the Com mons, had paid the taxes and claimed the land." He, therefore, referred the matter to him for a decision. The "Commons" was not selected; but the com mittee went half a mile to the eastward and selected a place on the hill-side, where they caused huts to be erected, and in whicii they stationed the prisoners. REVOLUTION. 1 59 This place has since been known as " Hessian Camp." The greater part of these huts were standing in 1841. The exact location was on an enclosed portion of land that lay between the Rose Valley Creek (at a point where the Mineral Spring Dam now is) and the " Hill Road " as now laid out. Then the trees were few in number and there was no road along the upper end of the camp. Some of the Hessian prisoners at Reading, during the course of their imprisonment, were hired out to service, notably to George Ege at Charming Forge and to John Patton at Berkshire Furnace. . At the close of the Revolution, the Hessian pris oners were returned by the British or satisfactorily accounted for, according to contract. It has been persistently stated as a tradition that many of these Hessians remained and settled in the county round about Reading ; but in my opinion this is erroneous. They could not have remained here except as de serters. Hessian Camp Surprised. — The following interest ing incident transpired at the Hessian camp on Christ mas day, 1 781. The Hessian prisoners and their guard were suddenly alarmed by certain soldiers in the disguise of Indians, which caused them to fly from the encampment. A court-martial was afterwards held, but no one was punished. "A^an Campen, whilst at McClure's Fort, which was on the Sus quehanna River, above Sunburj', upon the service of conducting scouts around the line of the settlements, was ordered with his company to Lancaster, late in the fall of 1781. He descended the river in boats as far as Middletown (a place ten miles below Harris's Ferry), where the order was countermanded by another, l6o REVOLUTION. directing him to march to Reading, Berks County, where he was joined bj- a part of the 3rd and 5th Pennsj'lvania Regiments, and a companj' of the Congress Regiment. Their principal duty, while here, was to take care of a large body of Hessians that had been taken prisoners with General Burgoyne. These had been under the guard of a companj- of militiamen, whose time had not yet expired. The march which A^an Campen's soldiers had performed was, on account of lateness of the season and bad roads, extremely fatiguing, and, as the time for which the militia were engaged continued them in service a little longer, he allowed them the space which intervened as a season of rest. This proved grateful to the soldiers, and it no doubt served to invigorate their spirits, for in the approaching Christmas holidays, thej- were found to be sufficiently recruited to engage in the exercises of sport. Some of those belonging to Van Campen's companj- deter mined to have a frolic with the militiamen before they should be discharged from their posts. These were stationed at a little dis tance out of the village, near the direct road from Reading to Philadelphia, on the side of a hill, around which the waj- turned, and which hid the view to the road before reaching the place. When Christmas came, twelve or fifteen j'oung soldiers set out, with music in their heads, for the militiamen's camp. Just be fore they came to where the road turned around the hill, and while they were j'et out of sight, thej' arraj-ed themselves in Indian dress and crept along up the ascending ground until thej- came in sight of the militiamen's camp. There they fired their guns, which contained an unusual charge of powder, and followed the discharge of these by loud and continued yells. They pre sented themselves to the view of the soldiers, and began to jump from tree to tree so as to produce an enlarged idea of their num bers. Their unexpected appearance produced the intended effect. The soldiers were startled by the sudden roar of the rifles, which echoed through the deep forest like the terrible thundering of cannon. The loud yells, too, from the supposed Indians, were enough to have startled them in a time of peace, much more when the savage was looked for at any moment to commit his deeds of violence. The soldiers conceived an instantaneous alarm ; fear was scattered throughout their ranks, and, with a sudden bound, they started from their encampment. The sentinels fled without firing a single gun and the whole company deserted their posts, leaving the poor Hessians (whom they were placed to guard) with out a man lo prevent their being retaken. But these, too, appre- REVOLUTION. l6l hensive that they might be mistaken for rebels, were infected with the universal panic and showed their heels to the enemj'. The camp was entirely deserted in a few moments after the flrst alarm had been given. No sooner had the militiamen deserted their camp than thej' began to spread the alarm, saying, 'that all Niagara was let loose ; that a party of several hundred Indians had attacked their camp, and that thej' had just escaped with their lives.' The intelligence was soon brought to the troops at Reading, who were immediately placed in the order of defence, and who began forthwith to march, with Van Campen at their head, towards the enemj'. They had not gone far, however, be fore they were met by some of their own soldiers, who assured them that they had started out upon a false alarm, at the same time giving them a history of the secret of the attack and of the brave defence which had been made by the militiamen. They returned to their quarters, very much amused and with the laugh upon the poor soldiers who had made such a display of their bravery. " But this little event (which had been conceived only in sport, like many others of the same origin) was the occasion of serious difficultj'. To one party it afforded the highest amusement, but, to those who had committed their valor to their heels, it was a subject of constant annoyance. Thej' could not endure the cha grin that was brought upon them by having been put to flight by a few boys who had been disguised as Indians, and who had so successfully played off their wits upon them of a Christmas holi- daj'. The militia officers, whose bravery was somewhat impli cated in the affair, declared that they would be satisfied with no reconciliation short of the punishment of those who had been concerned in creating the alarm. "A court-martial was held, in which Lieutenant Van Campen sat with the militia officers, to decide the point at issue. These- affirmed it to be but right — that those who had occasioned the mischief should be whipped ; while Van Campen, whose soldiers- were implicated, unwilling that his men (who belonged to some of the most respectable families of that part of Pennsylvania) should suffer such a disgrace, would allow of this only upon condition that the sentinels, who had fled from their posts without firing, should be punished as the martial-law required — with death. These terms were not agreeable to the minds of the officers, and' A' an Campen, who declared that he would sooner see his men shot 1 62 REVOLUTION. than whipped, continued to sit in court-martial for the space of three weeks. A compromise was flnallj' made between the two, it being proposed that the sergeant, who had been one of the leaders in the affair, should be broken of his rank. This was allowed, and harmony was again restored between the two parties. The ser geant was broken of his rank at night and restored the next morn ing ; so that his punishment, after all, was more nominal than real. Immediately after. Van Campen and his men entered upon the care of the Hessian soldiers and remained in this service until the next spring, when they were relieved by the militia, who again took them under charge." The foregoing extract was taken from the ' ' Life and Adventures of Moses Van Campen " by his grand son, John N. Hubbard, (published in 1841) pps. 239 to 243. Near the beginning of this extract he states that the Hessians at Reading had been taken pris oners with Burgoyne. This is not correct. No pris oners were taken in that important battle, October 17, 1777. The British Army surrendered to General Gates at Saratoga with the agreement that thej^ " should march out with all the honors of war, and have free passage to England, upon condition that they should not serve again during the war." Hessian Officer Drowned. — During the time that the Hessian prisoners were at Reading, a Hessian offi cer of rank was fishing from a canoe one day in the Schuylkill, and fell overboard. A servant on the shore saw the accident, but, instead of alarming the occupants in a house near by, he ran and informed the commanding officer. When the officer arrived, he found the Hessian at the bottom of the river, drowned, and his efforts to resuscitate life were fruitless. REVOLUTION. 163 Sickness and Burial of Hessians. — During the Win ter of 1776-77 there was much sickness amongst the prisoners. Many of them died. The burials were made in ' ' Potter's Field, " which comprised two lots of ground, numbers 398 and 399 on the west side of North Sixth Street, south of Walnut, in Reading. The deaths were so numerous at times that it became necessary to bury two, and even three, in one grave. I heard this statement made frequently by some ofthe older residents, but I always questioned its reliability, for I could not believe that dead prisoners would be carried from the Camp and buried within two squares of the principal thoroughfare and near the centre of the town. It is probable that the men buried there were sick soldiers who died in the churches that were used as hospitals, the churches having been near by on Washington street to the east and west of 6th street. GERMAN PRISONERS. On June 16, 1781, a large number of Convention prisoners of war, 1050, all Germans, excepting 63 Brittons, arrived at Reading under guard of the York County Militia. Col. Valentine Eckert called out two classes of companies from the 6th Battalion of Berks County Militia to guard the encampment. They were under the command of Major Bayley. During the week following, additional prisoners were brought, so that the whole number was near 11 00. They were en camped on the east bank of the Schuylkill, near the ferry on the road to Lancaster, having been ordered to be put into huts where wood and water were conven ient. Col. Eckert and Col. James Wood suggested 164 REVOLUTION. "that the Continental stables and a large store house might be converted into barracks to advantage by raising them about two feet and underpinning with stone, by which it would make them two stories, and, with some small additions, would shelter the whole of the troops. However, this would be attended with inconvenience, as their fire wood must be waggoned, but not any considerable distance. My [Wood's] inten tion is if the troops are to be hutted, and the Quar ter Master can procure tools and a person acquainted with building to superintend the work, to have them built by the troops and in such a manner as to be of use upon any other or future occasion." The stable was 20 by 175 feet, and the store house 20 by 60 feet. Krause's Company on Guard Duty. The following detachment of Capt. Charles Krause's Company of the ist Battalion Berks Count}' Militia was detailed on August 13, 1781, to guard the Con vention prisoners of war near Reading, from August 16 to October 16, 1781. The captain was paid the balance due, £2"]^, on April 28, 1790 : Captain. Charles Krause. Sergeants. Corporals. Ernst Gries. Christian Schmeck. Philip Dresher. Isaac Harmany. John Burchard. John Harmany. Privates. Philip Kline. Mathias Bower. Michael Christman. George Mumma. Jacob Sigfried. Henry Grub. Jno.' Fenstermacher. George Klapp. Fred'k Mengel. Abraham Gross. Baltzer Lutz. .Tohn Saul. REVOLUTION. 165 Adam Labar. Casper Merkel. Christian Wilhelm. Conrad Sitler. Christian Becker. Theobald Keffer. Adam Knettle. John Heines. Peter Rundorf. Titan McCarty. Philip Christ. Philip Dull. Peter Shomo. Lorentz Christ. John Norbeck. Mathias Flack. John Klockner. Additional Men as Guard. After peace was declared, a petition was presented to the Executive Council, subscribed by forty-three names, which prayed for an allowance to pay for mili tary services rendered. The petitioners set forth that they had been ordered out to guard the Convention Troops upon constant service from 1781 until peace happened ; that these troops were prisoners of war confined in the vicinity of Reading ; that the militia of that district had performed constant guard duty during the stay of the prisoners, to the great hinder ance of their several occupations, with a firm reliance that their country would make such satisfaction as the Militia laws should entitle them ; and that they had made numerous applications for pay, but their efforts were in vain. The subscribing names were as follows: John Folweiler. George Eisenbeis. George Gerdner. Nicholas Scherrer. Stephen Fitterer. George Young. Michael Reifsnyder. Jacob Merch. William Mears. Philip Weiss. Jacob Petery. Philip Ruppert. Jacob Stable. Conrad Geist. Henry Miller. Daniel Hiester. John Phillippi. Henry Hahn, Jr. George Snell. John Felix. George Brendlinger. Bernard Kepner. Henry Spengler. Peter Stichter. Abraham Phillippi. George Seitz. Alexander Klinger. John Shenfelder. Benjamin Parks, Jr. John Seitter. Jacob Klingman. Jacob Kesel. Ernst Gries. 1 66 REVOLUTION. David Herman. Andrew Eisenbeis. George Shoemaker. George Roland. Adam Spohn. John Lewis. Godfried Leman. Jonas Baum. Gottlieb Christian. Valentine Boyer. I could not find that any action was taken on this petition. Conrad Geist, one of the petitioners, had commanded a company as captain which served as guard of prisoners in 1776. The above names may not represent all the men who served at that time, for some may have died or moved away between the declaration of peace and the signing of the petition. From the contents of the petition, we must con clude that the militia of the county, especially from the vicinity of Reading, (which constituted the ist Battalion under the command of Col. Nicholas Lotz), were in constant service of this kind, and judging from other evidence of men in that service, they were de tailed for short terms. Continental Troops as Guard. Maj.-Gen'l Lincoln, Minister of the War Depart ment, informed the Executive Council on January- 2, 1782, that Gen'l Hazen's Regiment was appointed to guard the prisoners in the counties of Lancaster, Berks and York, whereupon the Council directed the Lieu tenants of the said counties to discharge the militia then on duty so soon as the Continental troops should take charge of the prisoners. Militia as Guard for Military Prisoners. On February 23, 1782, the Lieutenant of the county was ordered to call out the first class of militia to REVOLUTION. 1 67 guard the military prisoners at Reading ; but only 40 men were wanted at a time for this purpose. The order was as follows : " Ordered, That the Lieutenant of the county of Berks be di rected to call out a class of the militia of the said county, for the purpose of guarding the military prisoners of that county ; that as fortj' men are only wanted at one time for the said purpose, the lieutenant be directed to call out no more than that number, and that the battalion be called up in their numerical order, begin ning at the first, for the said one class, so far as may be necessarj- to furnish the said number ; and when the time of the first fortj' shall expire, he then call on the next battalion or battalions for the like number, so as to have the succeeding numbers ready to take charge of the said prisoners when the time of the flrst shall ex pire, and so on until the said one class shall have served their tour of dutj', or until further orders from this Council." Nagel's Company on Guard Duty. The following detachment of Capt. Peter Nagel's Company, in the 6th Battalion of Berks County Militia, was on duty guarding prisoners of war who were conducted from Reading to Philadelphia. I could not ascertain the time when the service was rendered. It was probably on September 19, 1782, when they were ordered to "mount guard." Oa/ptain. Peter Nagel. Casper Heiner. Privates. Christian Deringer. Joseph Kendall. George Phillipi. Nicholas Dick. Samuel Keiser. George Schultz. Peter Feather. Hartman Leitheiser. George Seitz. John Heiner. George Merkel. Abraham Witman. Benj. Hoover. Philip Nagel. Jacob Yoder. 1 68 REVOLUTION. CHAPTER VIII. ESTIMATE OF MEN IN SERVICE. The following statement shows the probable num ber of men from Berks County who were in actual service at some time during the Revolution. The figures at the end of each company indicate the num ber of men that appears in the rosters as published, except in several instances where it has been cor rected by positive returns. The companies, when or ganized and forwarded, were to have the regular num ber, and it is probable that they generally had this number, excepting when special orders were given to supply guards for the prisoners at Reading or men for defending the frontiers of Berks and Northumberland counties. How the number came to be reduced in nearly all the companies I am not able to explain. The reduced figures may represent the strength ofthe companies when mustered out of service. In reference to the battalions given, I have taken the number, either at the number ordered by the Executive Council which was to be supplied by the county, or estimated it at what was commonly known to comprise a battalion. All the orders for guarding prisoners I have fixed at 40 men, unless otherwise published. Previous to 1782, the number at one time acting as guard ex ceeded 40 men, but I cannot state how many. From the order of February 23, 1782, it is apparent that REVOLUTION. 169 the changes were frequent, and that five men were taken from each company in a battalion, and when the term of service expired, another class was taken in the same manner from the next battalion, and so on in numerical order until each of the six battalions supplied its quota. The estimate presented is evi dently less than the number of men who were in actual service. In several instances, the estimates of battalions and companies may be excessive. But, because there is no way by which to ascertain the figures accurately, we can not on that account ignore the evidence of men altogether, whether simply ordered or forwarded. When orders were made for troops to fill the quota of the county, and returns found, we can assert that they were filled ; but if no returns were found, it can not be said that the orders were not filled. I found evi dence of payments made long after 1783 for military services rendered before that time, notwithstanding I did not find any orders or returns for such services. For the year 1779, I did not find any returns. It is hardly probable that, for a whole year, there were no orders at all for troops from Berks County. From this, however, we are not to conclude that there were no men in actual service from the county during 1779, for some were in service by previous enlistment and re-enlistment for terms that extended into and beyond that year. For the year 1775. June — Company of Capt. George Nagel 95 170 REVOLUTION. For the year 1776. Januarj' — Company of Capt. Jonathaa Jones 83 " John Spohn 78 " Peter Decker 86 Februarj' — Detachment of Capt. Peter Nagel's Co. for guard ing prisoners 17 March — Company of Capt. Henry Christ 87 July — Company of Capt. Benj. Weiser 63 Other men in German Regiment 13 July — Battalion of Lt.-Col. Nicholas Lotz, quota required 666 August — Battalion of Col. John Patton (four companies) 191 " Company of Capt. Will — estimated 73 " " Daniel DeTurk 72 Battalion of Col. Mark Bird 300 September — Battalion of Col. Balser Geehr — estimated. . . .500 " Detachment of Capt. Conrad Geist's Co. guard ing prisoners 39 October — Quota ordered from county 500 Believed to have been supplied from 1st and Oth Battalions commanded by Col. Henry Haller and Col. Daniel Hunter. For the year 1777. Januarj' — Order for Snd Battalion — estimated 500 Partly filled by companies of Will, Diehl and Scheffer. February — Company of Capt. Jacob Moser 67 " Jacob Bower— (part) 34 Sundrj' enlistments in Continental Line 37 August — Two battalions commanded by Cols. Daniel Hunter and Daniel Udree 656 September — Two companies guarding stores at Reading — esti mated 50 each 100 November — Battalion of Col. Henry Spyker 400 For the year 1778. January — Recruited by Capt. Edward Scull 150 April — Guard ordi'red at Reading 300 " " " " Boone's Mill 10 REVOLUTION. 171 June — Von Heer's Dragoons 10 Augvist — Forward*ed to Sunbury 180 "Easton 123 October — Quota from countj' — two battalions For the year 1779. No troops were discovered as having been forwarded from the county during the j'ear 1779. For the Year 1780. June — Forwarded to Philadelphia, under Capt. Edward Scull 53 Julj' — Quota from Countj', (mostlj' fllled by six companies of Oth Battalion, and selections from 3rd 000 August — Two companies from 1st Battalion for frontiers — esti mated 130 Men in pursuit of Indians 113 For the Year 1781. May — One class, 4th Battalion 64 June — Two classes, 6th Battalion 138 August — Detachment of Krause's Company 36 August — Detachment of Stroud's Companj' 40 September — Recruits from Reading 153 October — Ely's Battalion at Newtown 300 October — Livingood's Company of Riflemen 83 October — Three companies to Newtown 180 Militia ¦from Greenwich and Maxatawny townships 130 Guarding prisoners — men supplied from Snd and 6th Bat talions 169 For the Year 1782. February — Robinson's Company to Northumberland county.... 60 February — Guard for prisoners at Reading 40 August — Frontiers of Berks County 37 August — Frontiers of Berks and Northumberland Counties 50 September — Frontiers of Northumberland County 135 September — Guard for prisoners at Reading 17 172 REVOLUTION. Recapitulation. For the year 1775... 95 For the year 1780 .... 884 " " " 1776... 3757 " " " 1781 ....1373 " " " 1777... 1784 " " " 1783 .... 319 " " " 1778... 679 " " " 1779... Estimated Total ... ....7791 Of these 7791 men, the foregoing narrative shows the names of 1542; and included in the latter number are the names of sixty-five captains and sixteen colo nels. The number of men for the years 1776 and 1777 appears incredible, but the reader will take into con sideration that the men for each year were not all in service at one time. Taking the reports of men in service that I have given in detail, and understanding that I have not been able to discover all the men that were enlisted, it can be said that the estimated total, as arranged, is not above, but rather below, the real number supplied by the county during the Revolu tion. The system of supplying men was simple, and it was carried on in such a manner as to render assist ance to the government with as little injury as pos sible to the several districts from which the men were called. The number demanded at one time was not extraordinary, compared with the total number sub ject to military duty, and the term of service was limited to such a period that the business interests of the people should not suffer serious losses. In this way, it was possible to have at least several hundred men from a county in service all the time. Averaging the quota of Berks County at only 300, and changing the men every ninety days, four times a year, for seven years, from 1776 to 1782, the total would ex- REVOLUTION. ^n ceed the number given. This is not a correct way to get at the probable number; still it can be made appa rent thereby that my estimate is not excessive. Jacob Baldj'. George Battorf. George Beaver. Jacob Bower. Michael Bretz. Henry Christ. Stephen Crumrine. Peter Decker. Daniel DeTurck. Samuel Dewees. John Diehl. George Douglass. Conrad Eckert. Michael Furrer. George Focht. Conrad 'Geist. Charles Gobin. Jacob Graul. Thomas Herbert. Joseph Hiester. Jacob Hill. Jonathan Jones. Names of Captains. George Kemp. Charles Krause. John Ludwig. Jacob Ladich. Sebastian Lentz. John Lesher. Jacob Livingood. Jacob Maurer. George Maj'. John Mears. George Miller. Jacob Moser. George Nagel. Peter Nagel. John Old. Dirck Pennybacker. Jacob Rickstein. George Riehm. Ferdinand Ritter. John Robinson. Jacob Rothermel. Nicholas Scheffer. Edward Scull. Peter Scull. Henry Shepler. Conrad Sherman. Casper Smeck. Peter Smith. John Soder. John Spoon. Leonard Stone. Henry Strauch. Bartholomew Von Heer. Michael A'oj-ge. Peter Wanner. Benjamin Weiser. Conrad Weiser. Henry Weaver. Matthias Wick. George Will. Peter Withington. James Wilson. Michael Wolf. Names of Colonels. Mark Bird. Daniel Brodhead. A^alentine Eckert. Samuel Ely. Balser Geehr. Henry Haller. Joseph Hiester. George Nagel. Daniel Hunter. John Patton. Michael Lindemuth. Henry Spyker. Nicholas Lotz. Daniel Udree. Jacob Morgan. Jacob Morgan, Jr. 174 REVOLUTION. CHAPTER IX. ARMY SUPPLIES FROM THE COUNTY. During the Revolution, many army supplies were either manufactured or produced in the County of Berks, more especially in the years 1775, 1776 and 1777; and these were collected from the several town ships and deposited at Reading, for the purpose of en abling the Commissioners of Forage to fill the propor tional allotments of the district with reasonable dis patch. They consisted of grain, flour, hay, powder, clothing, accoutrements, horses and wagons. The superior geographical situation of Reading led Congress to select the place as a general depot for storing supplies of all kinds. It was far enough from Philadelphia so that Gen'l Howe could not entertain any thoughts of capturing the stores with safety to his army, and yet it was near enough to enable the storekeeper to promptly fill orders made upon him. Store House at Reading. — In a letter of Col. Mor gan to the Executive Council, dated September 18, 1777, besides acknowledging receipt of an order for calling out the 3rd and 4th Classes of Militia, he stated as follows: "There is at present a great quantity of powder and other stores belonging to the States in this town [Reading] and there are two companies now out of said classes mounting guard over said stores. The people of the town are vastly uneasy at having so much powder here, and, unless it be very well guarded, that un easiness will increase to a great degree, as fire happening to the REVOLUTION. 175 house where the powder is lodged would tear the town to pieces and destroy the whole body of inhabitants. Many persons of the town, above 53 years of age, would make part of a guard if taken into pay, which would render it easy to send so many more of the militia as would otherwise be requisite for such guard. The Con tinental Press and Medicinal store also require some guard." By a letter of the same day from Christ and Shoe maker [Justices] to the Council it would appear that they had called two companies of militia to guard the said stores — "not forgetting the Continental Treas urer." The stores included a "vast number of am munition in the town, or near it." ' The companies had been in actual service for over three weeks. Supplies Manufactured. The following items were found relating to the supplies that were manufactured in Berks County, and forwarded in pursuance of orders given by the Execu tive Council : John Mears, of Berks County, carried on the manufacture of saltpetre. On Feb. 9, 1776, James Biddle was directed to supply him with £100 for that purpose, taking good security for the money and providing for the delivery of saltpetre to that amount in twelve months. Mears lived at Reading and subsequently be came a captain in the 4th Regiment of the Continental Line of Pennsylvania. Feb. S3, 1776. — An order for £90 was drawn to pay John Reith- myer, John Deisler and Peter Brecht for 150 cartridge boxes, etc., which they manufactured in Berks County and supplied to the Committee. And on May 8th, an order for £108, 15sh., was drawn to them to pay for 150 more. Isaac Levan, Jr., was one of the persons appointed by the Com mittee of Berks County to purchase arms for the use of the prov ince, and on April 9, 1776, an order for £19, ISsh. , was drawn in favor of Dr. Jonathan Potts for repairing 9 muskets which belonged to 176 REVOLUTION. the province. These muskets were ordered to be delivered to Capt. Thomas Herbert, of Berks County, who was then in the service of the province. He lived at Reading. May 18, 1776. — Mark Bird addressed a letter to the Committee of Safety, of Philadelphia, in which he made mention of muskets, &c., as follows; " If the Committee of Safety will send me the price of loo muskets and accoutre ments, with orders on the Commissioners to deliver to me such as they have ready, or my paying what they cost, I am of opinion in two weeks after the re ceipt of their orders and cash, I shall be able to deliver in Philadelphia the num ber mentioned. If each county will do the same, all the troops now in pay ofthe Continent and this Province may be armed in three weeks from this date — I mean the Continental troops in the barracks at Philadelphia. * * * * I am con vinced you may collect in the different counties a thousand muskets, but few accoutrements. If you send the cash to the different counties to some person you can confide in, the arms will be ready immediately, but till you send the cash to pay the smiths they will deny giving up the muskets. They like to see the cash without having the trouble of going so far as Philadelphia for it." This offer was accepted bj' the Executive Council and an order to him for £400 was drawn. And in August, 1770, the Committee of Safetj' also drew an order in favor of Samuel High, (a countj' commissioner,) for £600, on account of arms making in the county. Gun manufacturing was carried on along the Wj'omissing Creek in Cumru township, beyond Mohnsville, about seven miles south-west from Reading. There were many gunsmiths in the - countj', prominent among them being Balser Geehr. July 3, 1770. — An order for £300 was drawn in favor of George Ege for 100 tons of cannon balls. July 8, 1776. — Council passed the following resolution : " Tiiat the Iron Masters employed in casting cannon or shot for the public ser vice in the counties of Chester, Lancaster and Berks, be permitted to employ any ofthe soldiers, prisoners of war at Lancaster and Reading, as laborers in the said business, giving an account to the Committees of Lancaster and Reading of the time of such soldiers as they shall so employ." This permission was given in view of the public exigency which required additional artillerj' and war materials to repel the inva sion of the country by the armj' of Gen'l Howe, who had recently appeared at New York with the British fleet. July 33, 1770. — An order was drawn in favor of Michael Bright, (a county commissioner,) for £600 to pay for firelocks made in Berks County for the Province. REVOLUTION. 1 77 May 16, 1777. — Col. Morgan reported that orders had been issued for collecting the allotted number of blankets in the county for the Continental service, and also 300 for the county militia. He made inquirj' about arms and found that about 150 with accoutre ments could be procured at Reading, which might be made fit for service in a fortnight; as to drums, colors and fifes none had yet been collected. He then made an estimate that $3300 would be necessarj' to purchase blankets and carry the militia law in execu tion, and asked that this amount be remitted to him immediately. May 33, 1777. — An order was drawn to Col. Jacob Morgan for £600 for blankets and paying substitutes in the county. On June 10th, another order was drawn to him for £500, and at same time an order for 150 stand of arms and 1500 flints ; and on the 13th, an order was drawn to him for 150 knapsacks and cartridge boxes, and 350 canteens, for the county militia. Feb. 19, 1778. — A report was made to the Executive Council that Col. Mark Bird had sent by water to Philadelphia 1000 bar rels of flour during some time previous. Nov. 14, 1780. — George Ege, then lessee of Berkshire Furnace, supplied the National Government with shot and shell, amotint- ing to £3894. An account was opened in his books against the " United States." Shot: 843, 34-pd.; 3137, 18-pd.; 389, 13-pd. Shell: 867, 10-in.; 714, 8-in. SUPPLIES COLLECTED. And the following items were found, relating to supplies collected in the county : Sept. 36, 1775.— The Council of Safety directed an order to be drawn in favor of the Commissioners of Berks Countj' for £400 towards paying for the arms and accoutrements supplied. Dec. 1775. — The Council of Safety ordered all the arms belong ing to the province, found in Berks County, to be collected for the people and forwarded to Philadelphia as fast as collected. Aug. 33, 1776.— Order from Council of Safety to Mark Bird for £107, Ssh., 6d., for arms taken from Non-Associators for the use of his battalion. 178 REVOLUTION. Dec. 6, 1776.— Col. Balser Geehr was paid £11, 7sh., 4d. for re pairing arms and £85, 8sh. for arms taken from Non-Associators; and at the same time Col. Sebastian Levan was also paid £88, 3sh., 6d. for arms taken from Non-Associators. Dec. 11, 1776.— James Old was paid £3000 and John Patton £350 on account of cannon shot which thej' cast for the State. Old lived in Chester County, but Patton in Berks County. Dec. 19, 1776. — Three accounts were ordered to be paid for arms taken from Non-Associators in Berks County, amounting to £131 and charged to the Oth Battalion of Militia commanded by Col. Daniel Hunter. In 1777, the proportion of grain for horse feed from Berks County was 4000 bushels. June 14, 1777. — Morgan was directed to supply the State with 30 wagons as quota from the county. Sept. 8, 1777. — Council ordered 100 wagons to be sent to Phila delphia from Berks Count.y to assist in removing stores of different kinds, and the property belonging to the families of poor militia men, in anticipation of Gen'l Howe's invasion of Philadelphia, In Nov., 1777, in pursuance of orders received, 350 wagons were sent from Berks County to Philadelphia ; also, a wagon master- general and wagon masters. When they reached Philadelphia, the enemy had left, aud the wagons got nothing. Twenty were taken into service. The men returned and demanded pay. Henry Christ, Jacob Shoemaker and John Ludwig requested the Execu tive Council to forward monej' for this purpose. The sum re quired was between £3500 and £3000. Council, in writing to Gen'l Potter on Nov. 7, 1777, from Lan caster, as to a supply of muskets from the several counties, stated : " Berks, we dare say, will not be behind. Col. Morgan has been successful heretofore. Bucks and the two other older counties, [meaning Philadelphia and Chester] are less under notice here." Jan. 15, 1778. — Congress ordered 8000 barrels of flour to be de posited at or near Reading. Jan. 30, 1778. — The county was ordered to furnish 50 wagons for immediate service of the army as her quota of 380 wagons. In 1778, the supplies at Reading were large and valuable : and then Congress requested the State to station 300 militia at this point to defend the magazines of military stores, and keep communications secure from sudden incursion of the enemy. The Executive Council made such an order. REVOLUTION. 179 Feb. 10, 1778.— Col. Lutterloh reported to Gen'l Washington that he found a considerable quantity of clothing collected at Reading, waiting for an order to be sent forward. Feb. 18, 1778. — Berks Countj' was ordered to furnish a quota of 33 wagons. Feb. 30, 1778.— Ordered that the sum of £34,000 be sent by Col. Jacob Morgan to Valentine Eckert and John Lesher for pur chasing supplies; also an order to the treasurer for £150 for recruit ing, etc. Feb. 30, 1778.— Col. Joseph Cowperthwaite, of Lancaster, was appointed storekeeper at Reading. He had been colonel of the Sth Battalion of Pennsylvania troops for a time. May 18, 1778. — The quota of tax levied from Berks County for the year 1778, for the purposes of war, was £16,544. By the correspondence of James Young, the Wagon-Master-Gen eral of Pennsylvania, it appears that he was stationed at Reading from February to May in 1778. In March, he reported the wagons of the countj' as constantly employed in carrying flour and forage to the Schuylkill, and thence the articles were transported by water, because then the roads were almost impassible with loaded wagons. Col. Lutterloh, the Quarter-Master-General of Washing ton's Armj', was stationed at Reading with Mr. Young during March, and was ill for a time. Sep. 37, 1778. — A quota of 110 wagons was ordered from Berks County to carry provisions from Philadelphia to New AVindsor without delay. June 11, 1779. — A warrant was issued to the Wagon Master of Berks County to supply 60 wagons ; and on October 10, following, 30 wagons. In June 1779, Col. Jacob Morgan, Jr. , addressed a letter to the Ex ecutive Council in which he stated that he had sent into service 36 good Continental teams and 54 spare horses; also a brigade of 13 teams properly equipped. And prompted by a hopeful, enthu siastic spirit, he concluded the letter by adding; "There shall not be an idle horse in the county that is fit for the service. I made myself so bare that I put all the public riding horses into teams and one of my own. I am determined that neither man nor horse that is in the public service shall eat idle bread in this countj'. I think we should now exert ourselves, as I am in hopes this will be the last campaign." I Bo REVOLUTION. July 13, 1779.— Col. Jacob Morgan, Jr., was required to purchase and forward immediately to Philadelphia 500 barrels of flour for the use of the officers of the Continental Line. In April, 1780, the Executive Council was directed by Gen'l. Washington to furnish the State out of the supplies at Reading, with the following articles : 300 barrels of flour ; 500 gallons of rum ; 180 tons of hay ; and 14,000 bushels of corn. Col. Nicholas Lotz, as commissioner of forage, reported on June 5, 1780, that he had purchased 40 tons of flour, 173 bushels of oats and 19 bags ; and on June 19th, he reported the purchase of 10 head of cattle and 40 sheep, which he was obliged to take un der the law. Cattle and sheep he reported to be scarce, because many butchers and drovers had come from Philadelphia and other places and bought them up. On June Sist, an order for £1000 was drawn in his favor for expenses in purchasing cattle for the use of the armj' ; and on the same day a demand was made for 40 wagons from Berks County. The quota of articles, etc., from Berks County to the State in Jul.y, 1780, was — OOO barrels of flour per month ; 000 bushels of forage per month ; SO wagons and 300 horses ; and 300 militia ; and there having been a great want of teams in the armj' then, a requisition was made on the county to furnish 30 wagons. It was reported to Council on Aug. 13, 1780, that Col. John Pat ton, by agreement with Capt. Joj', agreed to supply the Board of War with 90 tons of shell and shot ; for which purpose he put his Berkshire Furnace in blast. He was then at work ; but how long he would continue he could not tell because his workmen were not exempted from militarj' dutj'. Then they were ordered out, and unless they were released he could not keep his works going. He had some Hessian prisoners emploj'ed. These were demanded from him ; and if they were not returned, his bond was to be put into suit. Jtine 33, 1787. — The Executive Council ordered Nicholas Sweyer to be paid £48, lOsh. for transporting military stores from Oley Furnace in Berks Countj' to Philadelphia in 1781, pursuant lo a resolution of the Assembly, September 30, 1781. Sept. 16, 1789.— Conrad Rielil was paid £9, lOsh. for 16 days' service in collecting and conducting a brigade of wagons to Read ing for public service in November, 1781, by order of the AVagon- Master-General. REVOLUTION. l8l By the foregoing orders and returns of supplies col lected, it appears that the county furnished 512 wag ons and 48 teams. Each wagon had a team of six horses, and was in charge of two men. Accordingly, there were also at least iioo men from the county in this important branch of service in the Revolution. SUPPLIES TAKEN IN OLEY IN 1 778. John Ivcsher, a prominent iron master of Oley, ad dressed a letter to the Executive Council on January 9, 1778, in reference to supplies for the army that were forcibly taken from him, and, in order to present the general situation that then existed throughout the county as to inconvenience and loss sustained by the people, it is introduced in this connection : " I conceive it to be my dutj' to acquaint you that I am no more master of any individual thing I possess, for, besides the damages I have heretofore sustained bj' a number of troops and Continental wagons in taking from me 8 tons of hay, destroj'ed apples suffi cient for 10 hhds. of cider, eating up my pasture, burning my fences, etc., and 3 beeves I was obliged to buj' at Ish. per pound to answer their immediate want of provisions, and at several other times since I have supplied detachments from the armj' with pro visions. There has lately been taken from me 14 head of cattle and 4 swine, the cattle at a verj' low estimate to mj' infinite dam age, as they were all the beef I had for my workmen for carry ing on my iron works. I had rather delivered the beef and re served the hides, tallow, etc., but no argument would prevail, all must be delivered to a number of armed men at the point of the baj'onet. As my family, which I am necessitated to maintain, con sists of near 30 persons, not reckoning colliers, wood cutters and other day laborers, my provisions and forage being taken from me, my forge must stand idle, my furnace (which I am about carrying on) must of consequence be dropt, which will be a loss to the pub lic as well as myself, as there is so great a call for iron at present for public use, and some forges and furnaces must of necessity fail for want of wood and ore. 1 82 REVOLUTION. " The case in this neighborhood is truly alarming, when the strongest exertions of economy and frugality ought to be practiced by all ranks of men, therebj' the better to enable us to repel the designs of a daring Enemj' who are now in our Land. It strikes me with horror to see a number of our own Officers and Soldiers wantonly waste and destroy the good people's properties ; by such conduct thej' destroj' the cause thej' seek to maintain. Instead of judicious men appointed in everj' township, or as the case maj' require, to proportion the demands equal according to the circum stances of everj' farmer and the general benefit of the whole, these men, under the shadow of the baj'onet and the appellation Torj-, act as thej' please, our wheat, rye, oats and haj' taken away at discretion and shamefully wasted and our cattle destroyed. I know some farmers who have not a bushel of oats left for seed, nor beef sufficient for their own consumption, while some others lose nothing — as a man who has 100 head of Cattle lost not one. Such proceedings I think to be verj' partial. Manj' farmers are so much discouraged bv such conduct that I have heard several say they would neither plow nor sow if this takes place. The consequence may be easily foreseen, unless some speedj' and effectual method be taken to put a stop to such irregular proceed ings, and encouragement and protection extended to the good peo ple of this Commonwealth. I shudder at the consequence. I humblj' submit the whole to j'our serious consideration." MASTS FOR THE U. S. NAVY. During August, 1780, Captain Dennis Leary was engaged on the land of James Wilson, Esq., along the river Schuylkill, some thirty miles north of Reading, superintending the cutting of masts for the Navy of the United States, where workmen were employed in that business, but he and the men were hindered by depredations of the savages. He informed Council "that masts suitable not only for our ships but for those of our illustrious Ally may be cut in that quar ter ; that, in fact, a number of very fine masts are cut, ready to be hauled to the river, and that many more may be procured if protection should be afforded to REVOLUTION. 183 the workmen." A company of 50 or 60 men was asked for this purpose. RECEIPT BOOK OF COL. LOTZ. In 1893, I saw the receipt book of Col. Nicholas Lotz in which receipts were taken for moneys paid from August 12, 1780, to December 5, 1781. The total amount was $202,033. Some of the items were reckoned in pounds, shillings and pence, but the most of them were in dollars. In this we have undoubted evidence that the county performed her whole duty in the struggle. A great part of the amount was paid in currency, which was never redeemed, whereby he and others suffered great losses. PROMINENT INDUSTRIES. Twelve prominent iron industries were carried on successfully in the county during the Revolution. They were situated in the four sections of the county, along strong streams of water, as follows : Furnaces. Oley, in Olej', on Manatawny Creek. Mt. Pleasant, in Colebrookdale, on West Branch of Perkiomen. Hopewell, in Union, on French Creek. Berkshire, in Heidelberg, on tributary of Tulpehocken Creek. Reading Furnace is frequentlj' taken as of Berks Countj', but it was situated in Chester Countj' not far from the Berks County line. Forges. Pine, Spring and Oley in Douglass, District, and Olej', on Mana tawny Creek. Mt. Pleasant, in Colebrookdale, on West Branch. Bird's, in Robeson, on Hay Creek. Gibraltar, in Robeson, on Allegheny Creek. Moselem, in Richmond, on Ontelaunee Creek. Charming, in Tulpehocken, on Tulpehocken Creek. 184 REVOLUTION. Iron Masters. — The iron masters, who were the proprietors of the foregoing industries, were Mark Bird, John Patton, John Desher, David Potts, John Old, Daniel Udree, George Ege and Christian Lower. The assessed value of the property of these men in the different sections of the county amounted to a very large sum in the aggregate, showing that they were in a situation to contribute a strong influence towards the successful prosecution of the war for the Revo lution. They supplied the Continental Government with cannon balls, cast iron and wrought iron in var ious shapes, and they co-operated heartily in the great social movement for representative government. Their assistance was of the greatest consequence and cannot be overestimated. We can take great pride in the fact that the county then possessed such enterprising, pub lic-spirited and patriotic men. Other Industries. — There were other industries that are equally worthy of mention, such as numerous grist mills, saw mills, gun factories, wheelwright shops and blacksmith shops. These were also situated along the strong streams in different sections of the county and rendered great assistance to Congress and the Council. Nicholas Lotz, Sebastian Levan and Daniel Brodhead were three extensive millers, and Valentine Eckert and Christian Lower were two influential blacksmiths, who identified themselves prominently in the public affairs that related to the Revolution. Knapsacks and gun barrels were made in different parts of the county. And numerous energetic, hopeful and persistent farmers con stituted the very foundation of the public welfare. REVOLUTION. 185 PRICES DURING THE REVOLUTION. Prices in October, 1776. Linen, per yd ISsh. Wood, per cord £3 Shoes, per pr 15 " Meat, per lb lOd. Salt, per bu 35 " The prices of articles generally Pork, per quarter 13 " were two and three times what Butter, per lb 3 " they were before 1775. In 1777. Prices in October, 1777, as fixed by the Commissary General : AVheat, per bu 8sh., Od. Pork, per 100 lb $7 and $8 Rye " 8sh., Od. Whiskey, per gall 8sh., Od. Indian Corn, per bu. . .Osh., 6d. Hay, per ton. 1st crop, £7, lOsh. Beef, per 100 lb $10 " " Snd " £6 Other Prices. Salt, per bu £10 and £15 Potatoes, per bu ... .16sh. Cord Wood, per cord 65sh. Chickens, apiece lOsh. When the Committee was appointed on November 8, 1777, to collect clothing, arms, etc., the articles taken were to be appraised as follows : New single blanket £3. In proportion for inferior kinds. Strong, large, well-made shoes, per pr 35sh. Good yarn stockings, per pr 33sh., 6d. Good well-manufactured cloth, f yd. wide, per yd 30sh. Good linsey woolsej', 1 yd. wide, per j'd 15sh. Good linen for soldiers' shirts, 1 yd. wide, per yd 15sh. Good tow linen, per j'd Ssh. The Committeemen were allowed 20sh. per day for every day employed in performing their duty. 1 86 REVOLUTION. In 1780. Col. Nicholas Lotz, as Commissioner of Purchases for Berks County, addressed a letter to the Executive Council, dated at Reading, June 5, 1780, in which the prices of certain articles at that time appear. They were as follows : Corn, per bu 5sh., 6d. Flour, per cwt 30sh. -Oats, " 3sh., 9d. Hay, per ton 80sh. Buckwheat, per bu 4sh. He assured the people that the merchants would take the new money at the same rate as specie ; and that the money would be received in taxes at one for forty of the present currency. He offered for hauling 2sh. per ton per mile ; 5sh. for each bag, and 3sh. for each cask ; which were the lowest prices paj^able in gold or silver. PAY OF MEN IN SERVICE. The estimated strength of a regiment in the Conti nental service in 1776, and the pay of the officers and men, according to a resolution of Congress in October, 1776, were as follows : Pay. Rations. Pay. Rations. Colonel $75 6 Adjutant 40 3 Lt.-Col 60 5 Q. Master 37A 2 ^ajor 50 4 Surgeon 33 3 Captain 40 3 Surgeon Mate 18 3 1st Lieut 37 3 Sergt. Major 9 1 Snd Lieut 37 3 Drum Major 9 1 Ensign SO 3 Fife Major 9 Regt. Q. M 40 3 Q. M. Sergt 9 Chaplain 33^ 3 REVOLUTION. 1 87 Each company was required to have, in addition to the officers enumerated, 4 sergeants, 4 corporals, 1 drummer, 1 fifer and 76 privates. The allowance for each private was $1 per week, and for each commissioned officer on recruiting service $3f. Lieutenants of county, $13 per diem ; Sub-Lieutenants, $10. Each company consisted of 90 men, including officers, and each regiment of eight companies, altogether numbering 733 men. CONTINENTAL PAPER MONEY. During the progress of the Revolution, the Govern ment of the United States was compelled to resort to the emission of "bills of credit " with which to pur chase army supplies, etc., and to satisfy the demands of carrying on the war. Gold and silver were not then known to exist in the country in any quantity equal to the demands of the war, nor could they be procured. Direct taxation, though practicable, was deemed impolitic. The only plausible expedient in the power of Congress was the emission of bills of credit, which were to represent specie under a public engagement of redemption through taxation, or of ex change for gold or silver. This practice had been familiar from the first settlement of the colonies ; and, under proper restrictions, it had been found highly advantageous. Congress, therefore, resolved, in June, 1775, to emit such bills to the amount of two millions of dollars ; in July, ordered a million more, and in November, three millions more ; and for their redemp tion. Congress pledged the Confederated Colonies. Subsequently other emissions were made ; and such was the animation of the times, that these several emissions, amounting to twenty millions, circulated 1 88 REVOLUTION. for some time without any depreciation, and com manded the resources of the country for public service equally with gold or silver. For a considerable time the Government derived much benefit from this paper creation of their own, though it was without any established funds for its support or redemption. Whilst the ministry of England were puzzling themselves for new taxes and funds on which to raise supplies. Con gress raised theirs by resolutions, directing paper ot no intrinsic value to be struck off" in the form ot promissory notes. But there was a point both in time and quantity beyond which this process ceased to operate ; that time was about eighteen months from the date of first emission and that quantity twenty millions. The rulers thought it still prema ture to urge taxation, and they, therefore, resorted to the expedient of further emissions. The ease with which the means of procuring supplies were furnished by simply striking off" bills of credit and the readiness with whicii the people received them, prompted Con gress to multiply them beyond the limits of prudence, and a depreciation of their value was the unavoidable consequence. At first, this depreciation was scarcely perceptible, but it increased daily, till finally the currency became worthless. It began at different periods in different States ; but in general about the middle of the year 1777, and then increased progressively for several 3'ears. In the latter part of 1777 it was two dollars in cur rency for one in specie; in 1778, five for one; in 1779, twenty-seven for one ; in 1780, fifty for one. After 1780, the circulation was limited to certain REVOLUTION. 189 localities ; but where the currency passed, it depre ciated to one hundred and fifty dollars for one. In Pennsylvania, the Executive Council resolved, as late as February i, 1781, that Continental money should be received for public dues at the exchange of seventy- five dollars in currency for one in specie. But an Act provided that after June ist, following, only specie or equivalent bills of credit should be received for taxes or other public dues ; and this rendered the currency worthless in the State. This extraordinary deprecia tion brought great loss to many of the people who had aided the Government in the grand struggle for free dom. In this respect the soldiers suffered most. The people of Reading, and especially of the county, met with considerable losses thereby. Some of them had large quantities which were transmitted for some time until lost or destroyed. It was not redeemed. In the issue of this paper money, certain prominent men were selected from the different sections of the several colonies for the purpose of signing the issues. James Read, of Reading, was selected to sign the Con tinental notes; and on April 7, 1781, John Patton, of Heidelberg, was selected to sign the issue of the Penn sylvania currency for ^500, 000. Col. Henry Haller, of Reading, was selected by the Executive Council, on June 14, 1779, to solicit sub scriptions in Berks County for the loan of twenty mil lion dollars by Congress. 190 REVOLUTION. CHAPTER X. PROCLAMATIONS FOR THE FAVOR OF GOD. During the Revolution, proclamations were rec ommended by Congress, requesting the people to pray for the favor of God, and to co-operate for success in the cause of free government. These public expressions indicate the high degree of re ligious faith which existed during that period. They are worthy of great praise and admiration. The com position, arrangement of ideas and selection of words are superb. Studying them carefully, I am led to say that the existence of this spirit amongst the people, especially as influenced and encouraged by men in political power, was a factor whose importance cannot be fully measured at this time. Without it, I question whether the movement of the disconnected colonies, scattered so far from one another, with little prepara tion for such a hazardous undertaking against a well- organized and powerful nation, could have been suc cessful ; but with it, the people generally were inspired with hope, confidence, perseverance, determination and courage, elements that were highly necessary in warfare, and these led them onward through the most adverse circumstances to victory. First Recommendation for Prayer. — The first rec ommendation for this purpose was made by Congress on December 11, 1776, in the words following : REVOLUTION. 1 91 " Whereas, The just war into which the United States of Amer ica have been forced by Great Britain is likely to be still continued by the same violence and injustice which have hitherto animated the enemies of American freedom. "And Whereas, It becomes all public bodies, as well as private persons, to reverence the Providence of God and look up to Him as the Supreme Disposer of all events, and the Arbiter of the Fate of Nations ; therefore the Congress hereby Resolve — " That it be recommended to all the States, as soon as possible, to appoint a day of solemn fasting and humiliation, to implore of Almighty God the forgiveness of the manj' sins prevailing among all ranks, and to beg the countenance and assistance of His Prov idence in the prosecution of this just and necessary War. The Congress do also, in the most earnest manner, recommend to all the members of the United States, and particularly to the Officers, Civil and Military, under them, the exercise of repentance and reformation ; and further do require of the said officers of the Military Department the strict observation of the Articles of War in general, and particularly that of the said Article which forbids profane swearing and all other immoralities, of which all such officers are desired to take notice. It is left to each State to issue Proclamations, fixing the day that appears the most proper for their several bounds." In pursuance of this Recommendation, the Supreme Executive Council of Pennsylvania appointed Thurs day, the 3rd day of April, 1777, for the said purpose, and issued a Proclamation accordingly on March 7, 1777. An order was made that it be published in all the newspapers, English and German, and that 500 copies be printed, (300 in English and 200 in German) and forwarded by the earliest opportunity to the dis tant parts of the State. Appeal for Support in Warjare. — When intelligence was received that the British were moving towards Philadelphia in September, 1777, the Executive Coun cil issued the following earnest appeal to the people and caused it to be published : 192 REVOLUTION. A Proclamation. "The time is at length come in which the fate of ourselves, our wives, children and property must be speedilj' determined. Gen'l Howe, at the head of a British Army, the only hope and last re source of our enemies, has invaded this State, dismissing his ships and disencumbering himself ofhis heavy artillery and baggage, he appears to have risked all upon the event of a movement which must either deliver up to plunder and devastation this Capitol of Pennsylvania and of America, or forever blast the cruel designs of our implacable foes. " Blessed be God, Providence seems to have left it to ourselves to determine whether we shall triumph in "victory and rest in free dom and peace, or, by tamely submitting or weakly resisting, de liver ourselves up a prey to an enemy, than whom none more cruel and perfidious was ever suffered to vex and destroy any people. " View then, on the one hand, the freedom and independence, the glorj' and iiappiness of our rising States, which are set before us as the reward of our courage. Seriously consider on the other hand the wanton ravages, the rapes and butcheries which have been perpetrated by these men in the State of New Jersej-, and on the frontiers of New York. Above all, consider the mournful pros pect of seeing Americans like the wretched inhabitants of India stripped of their freedom, robbed of their propertj', degraded be neath the brutes and left to starve amid plenty, at the will of their lordly masters, and let us determine once for all that we will Die or Be Free. " The foe are manifestly aiming either bj' force to conquer, or by stratagem and stolen marches to elude the vigilance of our brave commander, and declining a battle with our countrjmen they have attempted to steal upon us by surprise. Thej' have been hitherto defeated, but numbers are absolutelj' necessarj' to watch them on every quarter at once. The neighboring States are hurrying forward their militia, and we hope by rising as one man, and besetting the foe at a distance from his fleet, we shall speedily enclose him like a lion in his toils. " The Council therefore most humbl.v beseech and entreat all persons whatsoever to I'xert themselves without delaj' to seize this present opportunity of crushing the foe now in the bowels of our Country, by marching forth instantly under their respective offi cers to the assistance of our great General, that he may be enabled to environ and demolish the only British Armv that remains REVOLUTION. 193 formidable in America or in the World. Animated with the hope that Heaven^as before it has done in all times of difficulty and danger — will again crown our righteous efforts with success, we look forward to the prospect of seeing our insulting foe out off from all means of escape, and, by the goodness of the Almightj', the Lord of Hosts, and God of Battles, wholly delivered into our hands." On the same day, the 5th and 6th classes of Philadel phia were ordered out; the next day, every able-bodied man of Bucks County was ordered to turn out with his arms, &c., and "those who had no arms were to take with them axes, spades and every other kind of intrenching tools;" and on the 12th of September, the 3rd and 4th classes of Berks and Northampton, the 3rd of York, the 4th of Chester and the 2nd of North umberland. Proclamations for fasting, praise and thanksgiving were issued in the Spring and Fall of each succeeding year from 1777 to 1783 by Council, in pursuance of special recommendations of Congress ; also for victory over Cornwallis in 1781, and for peace in 1783. I have not found any written or printed evidence that these proclamations were generally observed ; but an intimate association with many people in all the districts of Berks County in their homes and churches for thirty years, a study of their manners, customs and religious convictions as transmitted almost unchanged from generation to generation for over a hundred years, and extensive researches into the social and moral history of their ancestors have made me sufficiently acquainted to express the opinion that such appeals during the dark days of the Revolu tion were thoroughly appreciated by them. 194 REVOLUTION. CHAPTER XI. COUNTY INCUMBENTS OF POSITIONS. The following men from Berks County occupied the positions named, for the time stated, during the Revolution*: National. Delegate in Continental Congress. — Edward Biddle, 1774-5 ; 1775-6; 1778-9. Secretary of Board of TTar.- Edward Scull, May 16, 1778. Surgeons. — Dr. Jonathan Potts, Dr. Bodo Otto. Surveying Department. — William Scull, Jan., 1778 to Sept., 1779. Deputy Quarter-Master General. — Jacob Morgan, Jr., Apr., 1778 to 1783. State. Delegates to Provincial Gonference.^3 nne 18, 1776.— Jacob Mor gan, Henry Haller, Mark Bird, Bodo Otto, Benjamin Spj'ker, Daniel Hunter, Valentine Eckert, Nicholas Lotz, Joseph Hiester, Charles Shoemaker. Delegates to Constitutional Convention. — July 15, 1770. — Jacob Morgan, Gabriel Hiester, John Lesher, Benjamin Spyker, Daniel Hunter, Valentine Eckert, Charles Shoemaker, Thomas Jones, Jr. Members of Assembly. — Edward Biddle, 1774, '75, '78 ; Henry Christ, 1774, '75; Henry Haller, 1770; John Lesher, 1776; James Read, 1777 ; Benjamin Spyker, 1777 ; Sebastian Levan, 1777, '78, '79 ; Daniel Hunter, 1777, '78, '81 ; Balser Geehr, 1777, '80, '81 ; Jonathan Potts, 1778; Mark Bird, 1778, '80; Gabriel Hiester, 1778, '79, '81; A^alentine Eckert, 1779; Christian Lower, 1779, '83, '83: George Ege, 1779, '80, '83; Jonathan Jones, 1779; John Patton, 1780, '83; Thomas Mifflin, 1780 ; Joseph Hiester, 1780, '81; Benjamin Weiser, 1781 ; John Bishop, 1781 ; Daniel Clymer, 1783, '83 ; Abraham Lincoln, 1783, '83 ; Nicholas Lotz, 1783, '83 ; John Ludwig, 1783 ; John Rice, 1783. REVOLUTION. 1 95 Edward Biddle was Speaker of the Assembly for the year 1774-5. The representation of the county was as follows : Two for the years 1774 and 1775, and six for the remaining years. The foregoing Representatives were elected the several years named for the term of one year. Executive Councillors. — Richard Tea, (Iron master of Hereford township) was a Councillor for a time. He was elected in 1776, and served until April, 1777, when he resigned. Jacob Morgan, Jr., was qualified on Sept. 3, 1777. He resigned April 4, 1778, upon accepting the appointment of D. Q. M. Gene ral. On May 35, 1778, an order was drawn to him for £301, 5sh., for attending Council 180 days, including mileage. James Read succeeded him, and was qualified on June 30, 1778. On Dec. 1, 1778, he received one vote for President of the Execu tive Council. He resigned June 4j 1781, and on the 5th, was elected Register of the Court of Admiralty of Pennsylvania. Sebastian Levan, of Maxatawny, was also a Councillor, and officiated from Oct. 31, 1781, to Oct. 15, 1784. Wagon Master General. — Henry Haller, June, 1779, to Aug. 14, 1780. Jacob Morgan, Jr., Aug. 14, 1780, to 1783. Superintendent of Commissioners of Purchases. — Jacob Morgan, Jr., Aug. 14, 1780, to 1783. Register of Court of Admiralty. — James Read, June 5, 1781. Prothonoiary of Supreme Court. — Edward Burd, Esq., appointed Aug. IS, 1778. He continued until Jan. 36, 1786, when he was re-appointed. County. Committee on Correspondence. — July 3, 1774. — Edward Biddle, James Read, Daniel Brodhead, Henry Christ, Christopher Schultz, Thomas Dundas, Jonathan Potts. Committee on Observation. — Decembers, 1774. — Edward Biddle, Christopher Schultz, Jonathan Potts, William Reeser, Balser Geehr, Michael Bright, John Patton, Mark Bird, John Jones, John Old, Sebastian Levan, George Nagel, Christopher Witman, Jacob Shoemaker, James Lewis. Colonels of Associated Battalions. — 1775. — Edward Biddle, Mark Bird, Daniel Brodhead, Balser Geehr, Christian Lower. 196 REA^O LUTION. Standing Committee. — 1775. — Edward Biddle, Mark Bird, Jona than Potts, Daniel Brodhead, Balser Geehr, Collinson Read, Sec, Valentine Eckert, Nicholas Lotz, Chairman, Sebastian Levan, Richard Tea. Lieutenants of County. — Jacob Morgan, June 9, 1777, to 1780 ; Valentine Eckert, Jan. 8, 1781, to 1783. Sub- Lieutenants. — Henry Shoemaker, Christian Lower, Jr., A'al- entine Eckert, Daniel Udree, Jacob Sweyer, John Mears. Paymasters of County Militia. — Daniel Hunter, 1776 to Aug. 35, 1777; Henry Spyker, Aug. 36, 1777, to 1783. Superintendent of Purchases. — John Patton, 177.8. Commissioners of Forage. — A^alentine Eckert, 1778 ; John Lesher, 1778 ; Nicholas Lotz, 1780 to 1783. In Oct., 1779, Col. Michael Lindemuth was appointed Commis sioner to purchase flour for the- French fleet. Collectors of Excise. — John Biddle, 1774 ; Daniel Levan, 1779-80; John AVitman, 1780-81 ; Conrad Foos, 1783, 1783. Waggon Master.— Henvy Haller, 1778 to 1783. Quarter-Master. — Jacob Morgan, Jr., 1778. Storekeeper at Reading — Joseph Cowperthwaite, 1778. Local Committees. — Owing to the aid given by divers inhabitants to the enemj', the Council in Sept., 1777, appointed committees to dispose of the property of such offenders and make return of their proceedings under oath. The following committee was appointed for Berks County : Thomas Parry, David Morgan, Peter Nagel, Henry Haller, Daniel Udree, Henry Spyker and Joseph Hiester. This committee appointed two persons in each district to make provision for distressed families whose husbands and fathers were in service. The appointees for Reading were Henrj' Hahn and Peter Feather. On Nov. 8, the Council also appointed committees to collect arms, clothing, etc., from the inhabitants who did not take the oath of allegiance, or who aided the enemj', and to deliver them to the clothier-general. The committee in Berks County was — Henry Christ, Henry Haller, Thomas Parry, Daniel Udree, Philip-Miller, Nathan Lewis, John Lower, Godfrey Riehm, Jacob Seltzer and Nicholas Scheffer. Committee on Attainder and Vesting Forfeited Estates. — 1778 — Henry Haller, Thomas Parry, David Morgan. REVOLUTION. 1 97 Auditing Committee. — Francis Richardson, Reynold Keene, Col linson Read, James Biddle and Henry Haller were appointed January 33, 1777, commissioners for the countj', to audit and settle the accounts for arms and accoutrements purchased, the property of persons lost in actual service, and of those who were killed, died in service, or were made prisoners. Judges.— Feter Spyker, 1775-83 ; George Douglass, 1775-83 ; Bal ser Geehr, 1775-83 ; John Patton, 1775-77 ; Jacob Morgan, 1775-77 ; Mark Bird, 1775-76 ; Jonathan Potts, 1776-77 ; Daniel Levan, 1777 ; Sebastian Zimmerman, 1778-83 ; AViUiam Reeser, 1778-83. Peter Spyker was appointed President Judge of all the Courts on November 18, 1780. Justices ofthe Peace. — 1777 — Henry Christ, Reading; Jacob Shoe maker, Windsor;James Read, Reading; Daniel Hiester, Heidelberg; Peter Spyker, Tulpehocken; Jacob Weaver, John Old, Amity; John Ludwig, Exeter; Benj. Shott; Christopher Schultz, Hereford; Samuel Elj', Richmond ; Jacob Wagoner, Bern; Daniel Rothermel, Maidencreek; Charles Shoemaker, Windsor; Egedius Meyer; Jacob Morgan, Caernarvon; Thomas Parry, Union. 1778 — Benjamin Weiser, Heidelberg ; Michael Lindemuth, Bern; Gabriel Hiester, Bern. 1780— John Guldin, Oley. County Commissioners. — Samuel Hoch, 1775-76; Michael Bright, 1775-77 ; Abraham Lincoln, 1775-78 ; Christian Lower, 1777-79; John Kerlin, 1778-80 ; Adam Witman, 1779-81 ; Thomas Jones, 1780-83; Thomas Parry, 1781-83: Daniel Messersmith, 1783-83; Michael Furrer, 1783. Sheriffs.— GieoTge. Nagel, 1775; Henry Vanderslice, 1776-77; Daniel Levan, 1778-79; Henry Haffa, 1780-81 ; Philip Kraemer, 1783-83. Treasurers. — Christopher Witman, 1775-79; Daniel Levan, 1780-83. Assessors. — The assessors appointed by the County Commissioners for the years named, were: 1776. — Vernor Stamm, Michael Furrer, Paul Geiger, John Spohn, John Kerlin, John Egner. 1777. — John Hartman, Michael Furrer, John Robinson, John Egner, George Kelchner, Joseph Sands. 198 REA'OLUTION. CHAPTER XII. AFFAIRS AT READING. PUBLIC PAPERS REMOVED FROM PHILADELPHIA. When the Executive Council anticipated the inva sion of the British Army into Pennsylvania, they re garded the public papers and documents unsafe at Philadelphia, and therefore directed them to be re moved to Reading. On December 4, 1776, they is sued an order to James Biddle for ;^I5 to pay the ex pense of removal. I could not find any action of the Council directing their return. They were doubtless taken back to Philadelphia about 1778, after remain ing here for over a year until the tide of warfare turned in favor of the Confederation. SOCIAL CONDITION IN 1777. Alexander Graydon lived at Reading for a time during the Revolution. In his ' ' Memoirs ' ' he men tions the situation of social affairs during the Winter of 1777-78. The following interesting extracts are presented : " The steady advance of the English upon Philadelphia dur ing the Summer of 1777 had thrown the city into a great panic. Many persons went to Reading as a place of safety — the fugitive families having been estimated at a score or more. The ensuing Winter (1777-78) at Reading was gay and agreeable, notwithstand ing that the enemy was in possession of the metropolis. The society was sufficiently large and select, and a sense of common REVOLUTION. 199 suffering in being driven from their homes had the effect of more closely uniting its members. Besides the families established in this place, it was seldom without a number of visitors, gentlemen of the army and others. The dissipation of cards, sleighing parties, balls, etc., were numerous. Gen'l Mifflin, at this era, was at home — a chief out of war, complaining, though not ill, consid erably malcontent, and apparently not in high favor at head quarters. According to him, the ear of the commander-in-chief was exclusively possessed by Greene, who was represented to be neither the most wise, the most brave, nor the most patriotic of counsellors. In short, the campaign in this quarter was stigma tized as a series of blunders, and the incapacitj' of those who had conducted it was unsparingly reprobated. The better fortune of the Northern Army was ascribed to the superior talents of its leader ; and it began to be whispered that Gates was the man who should, of right, have the station so incompetently sustained bj' Washington. There was, to all appearance, a cabal forming for his deposition, in which it is not improbable that Gates, Mifflin and Conway were already engaged, and in which the congenial spirit of Lee on his exchange immediately took a share. The well known apostrophe of Conway to America, importing ' that Heaven had passed a decree in her favor or her ruin must long before have ensued from the imbecilitj- of her military counsels,' was at this time familiar at Reading. And I [Graydon] heard him myself — when he was afterwards on a visit to that place — express himself to this effect; ' That no man was more of a gentle man than Gen'l Washington, or appeared to more advantage at his table or in the usual intercourse of life ; but, as to his talents for the command of any army (with a French shrug), they were miserable.' Observations of this kind, continually repeated, could not fail to make an impression within the sphere of their circula tion; and it may be said that the popularity of the commander in- chief was a good deal impaired at Reading. "Among the persons who, this Winter, spent much time in Reading, was one Luttiloe, a foreigner, who was afterward arrested in London on suspicion of hostile designs ; also William Duer, who either was or lately had been a member of Congress. * * * There was a Major Stine, a Captain Sobbe and a Captain Wether- hold, of the Hessians, whom I sometimes fell in with. One old gentleman, a colonel, was a great professional reader, whom, on his application, I accommodated with such books of the kind as 200 REVOLUTION. I had. Another of them, a very portlj' personage, apparantly re plete with national phlegm, was nevertheless enthusiastically de voted to music, in which he was so much absorbed as seldom to go abroad. From that obsolete instrument, the harp, he extracted the sounds that so much delighted him. But of all the prisoners, one Graff, a Brunswick officer taken by Gen'l Gates's army, was admitted to the greatest privileges. Under the patronage of Dr. Potts, who had been principal surgeon in the northern depart ment, he had been introduced to our dancing parties, and being always afterwards invited, he never failed to attend. He was a young man of mild and pleasing manners, with urbanity enough to witness the little triumphs of partj', without being incited to ill humor by them. Over hearing a dance called for, one evening, which we named "Burgoyne's Surrender," he observed to his partner that it was a very pretty dance, notwithstanding the name, and that Gen'l Bnrgoj'ne himself would be happj' to dance it in such good companj'. There was also a Mr. Stutzoe, of the Brunswick dragoons, than whose, I have seldom seen a figure more martial, or a manner more indicative of that manlj' openness which is supposed to belong to the character of a soldier." CONWAY-CABAL. The "Conway-Cabal" was a secret movement by which it was intended to remove Washington and put Gates in his place. Conway spent the Winter of 1777— 78 at York, intriguing with Mifflin, Lee and certain members of Congress to bring about the removal of Washington. The correspondence between Gates, Mifflin and Conway, reflecting upon Washington, be- camfe known through the indiscretion of Wilkinson, who had seen one of the letters and repeated its pur port to Stirling. The unfavorable impression pro duced by this discovery was not removed when Gates, with some bluster, first demanded of Washington to know who had tampered with his letters, and then denied that Conway had written the letter whose REVOLUTION. 20I words had been quoted. Mifflin had written to Gates, informing him that- an extract from Conway's letter had been procured and sent to headquarters. This perplexed Gates and caused him to suspect that his portfolio had been stealthily opened and his letters copied, and in a state of mental trepidation he wrote to Washington on the 8th of December, in which, among other things, he said : " I conjure your Ex cellency to give me all the assistance you can in trac ing the author of the infidelity which put extracts from General Conway's letter to me in your hands." Washington replied with characteristic dignity and candor on the 4th of January following, — sajdng, among other things : "I am to inform you then, that Colonel Wilkinson, on his way to Congress in the month of October last, fell in with Lord Stir ling at Reading and — not in confidence that I ever understood — informed his aid-de-camp, Major Mc Williams, that General Con way had written this to you : , ' Heaven has been determined to save your country, or a weak general and bad counsellors would have ruined it.' Lord Stirling — from motives of friendship — transmitted the account with this remark : ' The enclosed was communicated by Colonel Wilkinson to Major Mc AVilliams. ' Such wicked duplicity of conduct I shall always think it mj' duty to detect." Attempts to influence State legislatures proved equally unsuccessful, and when the purpose of the "Cabal" became known to the country and to the army, it met with universal condemnation. It has been said that this ' 'Cabal' ' was conceived at Reading, one tradition locating the place of meeting in a low one-story log building on the south side of Penn street, 60 feet above Eighth, (which was torn down in i884),and another tradition in a two-story stone building 202 REVOLUTION. on the south side of Penn street, 120 feet above Tenth, called for many years the "Fountain Inn." But these traditions are not correct. Conway was not at Read ing but at York at that time. He visited Reading afterward. Wilkinson was on his way from Saratoga through Reading to York, where Congress was then assembled, with dispatches from Gen'l Gates concern ing the surrender of Burgoyne's Army on the 17th of October. Accordingly, the people of Reading came to know of the surrender before Congress. DUEL AT READING. Col. Richard Butler's regiment was quartered at Reading during 1780-81. Most of its oflflcers were very worthy men. It was commanded by Lieut. Col. Metzger, in the absence of the Colonel, who was not at Reading most of the Winter. Metzger was one of the very few foreign officers who were valuable to the colonists. There was a Capt. Bowen in the Regi ment. He was recognized as an excellent officer ; but he had a warm temper which occasioned some dis turbance at Reading about that time. On one occa sion he took offense when none was intended, and on that account fought a duel with the major of the regi ment. The duellists each fired a shot, and Bowen had a button shot from his coat. Their seconds then set tled the matter between them. An investigation of the cause of the difficulty was then made. It ap peared the major was walking with some girls on the night before, and they burst out laughing just after Bowen had passed them. Their laughter was caused REVOLUTION. 203 by the major telling them of his and Bowen's be ing at a dance on the evening before, when the blind fiddler broke one of the strings of his fiddle and the landlady took a candle and held it for him while he was fitting a new string. This story even set the seconds to laughing and they all returned in good humor. Upon another occasion, soon afterward, while Bowen and Charles Biddle (who was then residing at Reading) were playing backgammon, at a certain place, Capt. Bower — an officer in the same regiment, came into the room and, addressing himself to Bowen, said: "I hope you are very well, Major." Bowen immediately started up and replied to him : "Don't major me, sir ! None of your majors ! You know I am not a major, sir! What do you mean, sir?" Bower declared that he had not intended to give any offense. Bowen then took Biddle into an adjoining room and inquired if he should not challenge Bower. Biddle replied to him that ' ' a man who would not fight on some occasions was not fit to live, nor was a man fit to live who was always quarreling." They returned, and Biddle made the captains shake hands, and so avoided a second duel. Bowen held the ap pointment of Town-Major for a time. PRE-REVOLUTIONARY BUILDINGS AT READING. At Reading three buildings have been permitted to stand, though erected before the Revolution. The foundations and walls are the same, but the external appearance is changed. They are : Farmers' Inn : Fifth and Washington streets ; erected as a two-story cut-stone building in 1760 by Michael Bright, and enlarged afterward. 204 REVOLUTION. Federal Inn : Penn Square, two-story stone build ing ; erected in 1763 and subsequently altered several times ; used as a bank since 1814. County Jail : Fifth and Washington streets, two- story stone building, with high wall extensions ; erected in 1770 by County Commissioners. It was used as such until 1848, when it was sold and con verted into a store. Other prominent buildings during the Revolution, whose likenesses have been preserved, are the following: Weiser Store Building : East Penn Square, two- story stone building ; erected in 1750 by Conrad Weiser ; destroyed by fire in 1871. First Reformed Church : Washington and Reed streets, large stone structure ; erected in 1761 ; torn down in 1832. County Court House: Penn Square, two-story cut-stone building; erected in 1762 ; tom down in 1841. Friends' Meeting House : Washington above Fourth street, one-story log building ; erected in 1765 and torn down in 1868. Trinity Lutheran School Building : Sixth and Washington streets, one-story stone building ; erected in 1765 ; torn down in 1893. During that time, there were three churches at Reading : Trinity Lutheran, Washington below Sixth; First Reformed; and Friends'. These were the churches that were used for hospital purposes. REVOLUTION. 205 CHAPTER XIII. . CONCLUSION. INDEPENDENCE AND PEACE. The surrender of Lord Cornwallis at Yorktown on October 19, 1781, was virtually the end of the war between Great Britain and America. The news of the surrender reached London on the 25th of November, following. Several months afterward, the warfare in the American Colonies was discussed and its continu ance discouraged in the House of Commons, a resolu tion having been passed, declaring that they who advised the continuation of the war were enemies of their country. These discussions were continued with earnestness till they culminated in a preliminary treaty of peace on November 30, 1782. In the first article of this treaty, ' ' the independence of the thir teen United States of America" was recognized. The treaty was not made final then, owing to the three allied powers — Great Britain, France and Spain — having been pledged to one another not to conclude a treaty except by common consent ; and the consent of France and Spain was to be obtained. This occa sioned further delay and obliged the United States to await the adjustment of the differences between them. The final treaty of peace was concluded at Paris on September 3, 1783, arid thereby the United States were acknowledged to be " free, sovereign and inde pendent." 2o6 REVOLUTION. During these two years of negotiation and delay there were no general military operations. But great anxiety was felt over the prospects for a permanent peace. Through the inactivity of the army, the offi cers and soldiers became restless ; also discontented, because they were not rewarded for their patriotic services. An attempt was made by anonymous and seditious publications to inflame their minds and to induce them to unite in redressing their grievances whilst they had arms in their hands. But Washington succeeded in quieting them. His wisdom and elo quence elicited from the officers the unanimous adop tion of a resolution by which they declared ' ' that no circumstances of distress or danger should induce a conduct that might tend to sully the reputation and glory they had acquired ; that the army continued to have unshaken confidence in the justice of Congress and their country ; and that they viewed -with abhor rence and rejected with disdain the infamous propo sition in the late anonymous address to the officers of the army." RETURN OF THE SOLDIERS. In order to avoid the inconveniences of dismissing a great number of soldiers in a body, furloughs were freely granted. In this way a great part of the un paid army was disbanded and dispersed over the States without tumult or disorder. As they had been easily and speedily formed out of farmers, mechanics and laborers in 1775, so with equal facility did they throw off their military character and resume their former occupations. They had taken up arms earnestly for REVOLUTION. 207 political freedom, but when these were no longer nec essary, they laid them down peaceably to become again good, industrious citizens as they had been for eight years devoted and patriotic soldiers. The manner and time of the return of Berks County troops from the seat of war have not as yet been ascertained. REVOLUTIONARY SURVIVORS. In 1823, there were forty-six survivors of the Revolution, still living at Reading. During the gubernatorial campaign of that year, thirty-nine of these survivors held a public meeting on the 19th of August, for the purpose of endorsing Andrew Gregg, the Federal Candidate for Governor. Their names were : Peter Nagel. John Strohecker. Nicholas Dick. George Snell. Henry Miller. Henry Stiles. Michael Reifsnyder. Michael Spatz. John Snell. George Price. David Fox. Christian Miller. Jacob Petree. Andrew Fichthorn. Peter Stichter. James Haiden. John Giley. John Sell. Frederick Heller. John Snyder. Michael Madeira. Jacob Dick. Daniel Rose. Gottlieb Christine. William Mannerback Philip Nagel. Alexander Eisenbise. Balser Ottenheimer. George Slear. John Bingeman. John Pox. Henry Hahn. Christopher Diem. George Yerger. John Row. Ludwig Katzenmyer. Christian Hoffman. Samuel Homan. Henry Diehl. Capt. Peter Nagel acted as chairman of the meet ing, and Michael Madeira as secretary. Daniel Rose, John Strohecker and Balthaser Ottenheimer reported appropriate resolutions, which were unanimously adopted. The following expressive and enthusiastic language was used in the introductory part of the resolutions : 2o8 REA'OLUTION. "Ourhoarj' locks and trembling limbs forbid the expectation that many of us will assemble again in this life on a similar occasion. AVe wish to retire from the world and its cares, but when the Constitution of our country is assailed, whose rights are invaded for which we have seen so much blood and treasure expended, when the men of the Revolution are denounced as Tories, because thej' refuse to join the standard of the enemj' of that constitution and those rights, shall we, who, regardless of the name of Rebel, and in defiance of British bayonets, once step ped forward in defence of our country, now shrink from our duty to that country at the cry of Federalist or Torj', blue light or Hartford conventionist ? No, forbid it the memorj' of our de ceased fellow-patriots. No, by the spirit of '76, which is j'et glowing in our bosoms, we come an united band of soldiers for life in our country's cause, to rallj' round our constitution, offer ing our example to the rising generation, and solemnly declaring that if the public liberties must fall, we are ready to be buried in the ruins. [Berks and Schuylkill Journal, Aug S3, ISSS.] The candidate on the Democratic ticket was the Rev. John Andrew Shulze, a native of Berks County, but then a resident of Lebanon County. The sur vivors of the Revolution exerted a strong political in fluence at Reading, but Shulze was elected by 25,706 majority, and the constitution was not assailed. Its principles were so successfully upheld by him, and its provisions carried out, that he was re-elected three years afterward with little opposition. In 1840, the Census reported nine surviving Revolu tionary soldiers in Reading, who were then drawing- pensions from the State Government, the figures indi cating their age at that time : Michael Spatz, 78. AA'illiam James, 79. Henry Stiles, 84. Peter Stichter, 78. Sebastian Allgaier,83. Joseph Snablee, 84. Aaron Wright, 78. John P. Na-el, 83. Christian Miller, 85. In 1846 two still survived — Michael Spatz and William James. SKETCHES. 209 BOOK II. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. EDWARD BIDDLE. Edward Biddle was born in 1732. He was the fourth son of William Biddle, a native of New Jersey, whose grandfather was one of the original proprietors of that State, having left England with his father in 1681. His mother was Mary Scull, the daughter of Nicholas Scull, who was Surveyor-General of Pennsyl vania from 1748 to 1 76 1. James, Nicholas and Charles Biddle were three of his brothers. On February 3, 1758, he was coinmissioned an en sign in the Provincial Army of^ Pennsyh'ania and was present at the taking of Fort Niagara in the French and Indian War. In 1759 he was promoted to lieutenant, and in 1760 he was commissioned as a captain, after which he re signed from the army and received 5000 acres of land for his services. He then selected the law as his pro fession, and after the usual course of study at Phila delphia, most likely in the office of his elder brother, James, he located at Reading, and soon established himself as a la-wyer. 2IO REVOLUTION. In 1767, he was elected to represent Berks County in the Provincial Assembly, and he was annually re elected until 1775, and again in 1778. In 1774 and 1775, he officiated as Speaker, but he was obliged to resign this responsible position on March 15, 1775, on account of illness. He had previously been placed upon the most important committees, and had taken an active part in all the current business. When the citizens of Reading held a public meet ing on July 2, 1774, to take initiatory steps in behalf of the Revolution, they selected Edward Biddle to pre side over their deliberations, and the expressive reso lutions then adopted by them were doubtless drafted by him. His patriotic utterances on that occasion won their admiration, and they unanimously gave him a vote of thanks in appreciation of his efforts in the cause of the rights and liberties of America. On the same day, while he was presiding at this meeting, the Assembly of Pennsylvania was in session and elected eight delegates as representatives to the " First Continental Congress," and among them was Edward Biddle, of Reading. When this Congress as sembled at Philadelphia on September 5, 1774, the subject which principally occupied its attention was referred to a committee of two delegates from each Colony, and Biddle was selected as one of them. They were directed ' ' to state the rights of the colonies in general, the instances in which those rights were vio lated, and the means most proper to be pursued for obtaining a restitution of them." The able declara tion, which the committee reported, was earnestly supported by Biddle, though opposed by his colleague. SKETCHES. 211 The report of the Pennsylvania delegates to the As sembly was approved by it, and this action gave Penn sylvania the credit of being the first constitutional House of Representatives that ratified the Acts of Con gress. Biddle was again selected as one of the delegates to the new Congress, which was to be held on May IO, 1775. On his way from Reading to Phil adelphia, by boat, to attend the second convention, he accidentally fell overboard into the Schuylkill, and circumstances compelling him to sleep in his wet clothing, he took a cold, which resulted in a violent attack of illness. Besides leaving him, a confirmed invalid for the rest of his life, he was deprived of the sight of one of his eyes. He was one of the twenty- two members of Congress who did not sign the " Dec laration of Independence." His illness may- account for his non-attendance and non-subscription of that great document for our political freedom. He was elected three times as a delegate to Congress. The first two terms extended from September 5, 1774, to December 12, 1776, and the last from 1778 to 1779. I could not find any information of his public actions, from 1776 to 1779, excepting his attendance of the meetings of the Committee of Safety at Philadelphia in the beginning of January, 1776. The public records in the county offices, especially in the Prothonotary's office, disclose a large and lucra tive practice as an attorney-at-law, and this ex tended from 1760 to the time of his decease in 1779. It seems to have been as much, if not more than that of all the other attorneys taken together. 2 1 2 REVOLUTION. He died on September 5, 1779, at Baltimore, Md., whither he had gone for medical treatment. He was married to Elizabeth Ross, a daughter of Rev. George Ross, of New Castle, Delaware, by whom he had two daughters, Catharine (married to George Lux, Esq., of Baltimore), and Abigail (married to Capt. Peter Scull.) His connection with this distinguished family gave him great social and political prominence. After his decease, notices appeared in various publications highly complimentary of his character. O^USi:^-^ MARK BIRD. Mark Bird was the son of William Bird, one of the most prominent iron men of Berks County from 1740 to 1762, whose works were situated near the mouth of Hay Creek, in Union township. He was born at that place in January, 1739, and learned to carry on the iron business. After his fa ther's death, he took charge of the estate, and, by par tition proceedings in the Orphans' Court, came to own the properties consisting of 3000 acres of land, three forges, a grist mill and saw mill. About that time he laid out a town there and named it Birdsboro. By the time the Revolution broke out, he had enlarged his possessions very much and had come to be one of the richest and most prominent and enterprising men in this section of the State. The Recorder's office shows that he also owned at different times various properties at Reading. SKETCHES. 213 In the popular demonstrations at Reading for the Revolution, he took an active part. At the public meeting on Dec. 5, 1774, he was selected as one of the Committee on Observation recommended by Con gress, and on January 2, 1775, he was chosen one of the Delegates to the Provincial Conference, and also placed on the Committee of Correspondence. He was also prominently identified with the military move ments, and at the meeting at Lancaster on July 4, 1776, for the election of two Brigadier-Generals, he received seven votes. During the years 1775 and 1776, he officiated as one of the Judges of the County Courts. In 1775 and 1776, Mark Bird was the Lieutenant- Colonel of the 2nd Battalion of the County Militia, which was formed out of companies in the vicinity of Birdsboro ; and in August, 1776, as a colonel, he fitted out 300 men of his battalion with uniforms, tents and provisions at his own expense. I could not ascertain that he led them into any engagement. They were in service at or near South Amboy in the Fall of 1776, and may have constituted a part of the " Flying Camp." In 1785, his landed possessions in Berks County in cluded 8000 acres, upon which were the extensive iron works at Birdsboro, and also the Hopewell Fur nace on Six Penny Creek, which he had erected about 1765. And it is said that he owned large property interests in New Jersey and Maryland. The wide distribution of his investments led him to remark boastfully upon one occasion that he could not be overcome by fire, wind or water. By a strange coin- 214 REVOLUTION. cidence, he actually became embarrassed by losses through fire, wind and water in the several localities where his posses,sions were situated, and in 1786, he was compelled to make an assignment of his estate for the benefit of creditors. About 1788, he removed to North Carolina, where he died some years after ward, the exact place and time I have not been able to ascertain. He was married in 1763, to Mary Ross, a daughter of Rev. George Ross, by whom he had children, but the number and names could not be ascertained. He was a brother-in-law of Edward Biddle ; also of George Ross, of Lancaster, a signer of the Declaration of Independence. JACOB BOWER. Jacob Bower was born in 1757 and entered the Revolution as first lieuten ant in the company of Capt. Benjamin Weiser, which was raised in Heidelberg township, in the vicinity of Womelsdorf At that time he was still a young man under age. Subse quently, he was promoted to captain, and as such served until peace was declared in 1783. At the close of the war, he settled at Reading and became a promi nent county official. He first filled the office of sheriff" for one term, from 1788 to 1790 ; then county SKETCHES. 215 commissioner, from 1790 to 1793 ; recorder, register and clerk of the Orphans' Court, from 1792 to 1798 ; and county auditor for the years 1799 and 1800. Some time after 1800, he removed to Womelsdorf and be came an invalid, where he died Aug. 3, 1818. The following obituary notice appeared in the Berks and Schuylkill Journal, Aug. 8, 18 18, at the time of his decease : " Died at Womelsdorf, in this countj-, on Monday last, after a tedious and severe illness, aged 01 j'ears, Gen'l Jacob Bower. The deceased was a faithful and active officer during the whole of the Revolutionary war. He sacrificed at the shrine of Liberty a large patrimony, but, like many other veterans of the Revolution, was doomed to feel the stings of adversitj' in his old age." He was a son of Conrad Bower, innkeeper, of Read ing, who died in 1765, and whose widow became the second wife of Michael Bright. MICHAEL BRIGHT. Michael Bright was born November 24, 1732, in Heidelberg township, Lancaster (now Lebanon) County, near Sheridan. His father, Michael Brecht, emigrated from Schriessheim, in the Palatinate, to Pennsylvania, in 1726, when 20 years old. He learned the trade of saddler and located at Reading about 1755. He carried on this occupation success fully until 1762, when he became an innkeeper and owner of the Farmers' Inn, on the north-west corner of Fifth and Washington streets, which is still stand ing, though enlarged and owned by his grandson. 2l6 REVOLUTION. Francis Bright. In 1774, he was elected as a county commissioner and served three years. This position at that time was one of large responsibility. In De cember of that year, he was appointed one of the ' ' Committee of Observation ' ' of the county, whose duties were to collect funds for the relief of Boston, to watch the disaffected citizens and require them to give up their arms, and in general to provide for the common defense. This committee was also known as the "Standing Committee." He was a man of considerable character and acquired a large amount of property. He died at Reading in August, 1814. He was married twice, first to Sarah Stoner, by whom he had two sons, Michael and Jacob; and next to Catha rine Bower (widow of Conrad Bower), by whom he had three sons, David, Peter and John, and a daughter Sarah, married to Leonard Rupert. DANIEL BRODHEAD. Daniel Brod head was bom at Albany, N. Y., in 1725. In 1738, his father migrated to Pennsylvania, and set tled in Monroe County, now East Stroudsburg, where he grew up in a frontier life. Their house was attacked by Indians in 1755. In 1771, he removed to Heidelbeig township, Berks County, where he pur chased and carried on a grist mill. Soon afterward, he SKETCHES. 217 was appointed deputy-surveyor under John Lukens, Surveyor-General. In July, 1775, he was appointed a delegate from Berks County to the Provincial Conven tion at Philadelphia. In March, 1 776, he was appointed lieutenant-colonel of Miles' rifle regiment ; and in October following, he was transferred to the 3rd Penn sylvania Battalion, known as Shee's. On March 12, 1777, he was promoted to colonel of the 8th Pennsyl vania Continental Line, to rank from September 29, 1776. Upon the capture of Colonel Miles, at the battle of Long Island, in August, 1776, the command of the remainder of the battalion devolved upon him; and he was, in fact, after the battle, in command of the whole Pennsylvania contingent, being then the senior officer remaining in the army. Shortly after ward, he went home on sick-leave, and when he re joined the .army it was as colonel of the Sth Regiment. He was stationed at Fort Pitt, in the western part of Pennsylvania, in 1779 and 1780. His correspond ence from April, 1779, to October, 1780, while there, is published in the Appendix to the Pennsylvania Archives, and covers 173 pages. In January, 1781, he was transferred to the ist Pennsylvania Line, and he was still colonel of the regiment in September, 1783. He made some important treaties with the Indians, and for this he expected to be ordered to move into the Indian country, but he was disappointed, the command having been given to Colonel Clark, a Virginia officer. The war having then been virtually ended, he was not assigned to any command. It is believed that he received the appointment of brigadier- general before the close of the war. 2l8 REVOLUTION. In 1789, he represented Berks County in the Gene ral Assembly and participated in the important dis cussion relating to the alteration and amendment of the Constitution of 1776. He voted in the affirma tive. Subsequently, in the same year, when the As sembly reconvened, he voted for the calling of a con vention to amend the Constitution. In 1789, he received the appointment of Surveyor-General of Penn sylvania, which he held for eleven years. About that time he removed to Milford, Pike County, Pa., where he died November 15, 1809. In 1778, he married the widow of Samuel Mifflin, of Philadelphia, who was the brother of Gen'l Thomas Miffiin, afterward Governor of Pennsylvania. They then lived at Reading, and at her death in 1788, they were residents of the same place. EDWARD BURD. Edward Burd was a practicing attorney at Reading, • having been admitted to practice in the courts of Berks County in 1772. He moved to Reading from Lancaster. Wlien the company of Capt. George Nagel marched to Cam bridge, in Massachusetts, during July and August, in 1775, Burd was one of a number of devoted and patri otic sons who went along at their own expense ; and when the " Flying Camp " was raised, he was chosen major of Haller's Regiment. In the Battle of Long SKETCHES. 219 Island, in August, 1776, he was taken prisoner, and while imprisoned addressed a letter to Hon. Jasper Yeates, at Lancaster. On August 12, 1778, he was appointed prothonotary of the Supreme Court, and he continued to officiate in this position by reappoint ment until January 2, 1800. HENRY CHRIST. Henry Christ was a man of prominence at Reading in 1760, and officiated as sheriff" of Berks Coun ty for the years 1761 and 1762. He showed a proper enthusiasm in the first movement at Reading for the Revolution in 1774, and was appointed by Edward Biddle as one of the Committee on Correspondence. In 1776 he raised and commanded a company of rifle-men in the cam paign of Long Island, though not actually engaged in the battle. In 1777 he was placed on the Commit tee to collect arms, &c. Upon his return, he was appointed a justice of the peace of Reading, and in 1784 he was reappointed for another term of seven years. While holding this office he also served as recorder, register and clerk of the Orphans' Court of the county from 1777 to 1789, excepting the last-named office for the year 1789 ; and he was also clerk of the Quarter Sessions for 1779. 220 REVOLUTION. He died at Reading in August, 1789, and left a large estate. He had four sons — Henry, Jacob, John and Daniel — and six daughters — Barbara (married to John Gallentine), Maria (married to George Spangler), Catharine (married to Capt. Jacob Graul), Margaret (married to Jacob Zimmerman), Susanna (married to Frederick Gossler) and Magdalena (married to Mich ael Lutz). PETER DECKER. Peter Decker was a retired gentlemen at Reading in 1768, and at the beginning of the Revolution raised a company which was to have been a part of the regi ment from Berks County in the ' ' Flying Camp, ' ' commanded by Lt.-Col. Nicholas Lotz, but the county quota was made up without his company and it became connected with the regiment com manded by Col. Robert Magaw, of the 5th Pennsyl vania Battalion. He participated in the Long Island Campaign. In i779,he was a resident of Cumru town ship, where he carried on a tavern until he died in 1784. GEORGE DOUGLASS. George Douglass, son of Andrew Douglass, and Jane Ross, (a daughter of the Earl of Ross,) was born at Pequea, in Lancaster County, Pa., on February 25, 1726. He removed to Berks County when a young SKETCHES. 221 man. He was located in Brecknock township in 1757, and by 1760 came to own a large grist mill and plantation of 247 acres whicii he carried on for some time. About 1761 he settled in Amity township, and there he remained until his decease. He served as a Justice of the Peace of the township named for several years before 1770, and he officiated as one ofthe Judges ofthe county courts from 1772 to 1784. In the organization of Lotz's Battalion for the "Flying Camp," a company was included that was commanded by one Douglass whose first name is not given in the returns. It is believed that George Doug lass was this captain, for there was no other George Douglass in the county in 1776, excepting his son George, and he was only nine years old. The men in his company resided in Amity township and vicinity. His wife was Mary Piersol. He died March 10, 1799, and left six children — Richard, Andrew, George, Elizabeth (married to John Jenkins), Rebecca (mar ried to Mordecai Piersol), and Bridget (married to James May.) Andrew, the second son, was married to Rachel Morgan, a daughter of Col. Jacob Morgan, Jr. THOMAS DUNDAS. Thomas Dundas was a prominent merchant at Reading for many years. He was the third son of 222 REVOLUTION. the Earl of Dundas. When the feelings of the inhab itants were being excited in behalf of the Revolution, he was found among the number that favored the cause of freedom. He took an active part at the first public meeting which was held at Reading, on July 2, 1774, and was appointed on the committee to carry on correspondence with the similar committees from the other counties of the Province. During the year 1776, he officiated as Prothonotary of the county. He died at Reading on April 25, 1805, and left a son William, and a daughter Jane, who was married to Marks John Biddle, a lawyer at Reading. CC'T^Z-^i^^^i^ The Weekly Advertiser, a newspaper published at Reading, made the following mention of his decease in the issue of April 27th : "Thomas Dundas was a very respectable inhabitant of this borough, where he had resided nearlj' forty j'ears. As a man of business, and as a gentleman of sound understanding and liberal manners, his death maj' be regarded as a public loss ; but by a numerous circle of private friends, his memory will be long and affectionately cherished for his urbanity and social virtues." He was a particular friend of Dr. Jonathan Potts — the doctor having appreciated his kindness so highly that upon his death in 1781, he bequeathed to him 100 guineas in money, and his Revolutionary sword and pistols. SKETCHES. VALENTINE ECKERT. 223 Valentine Eckert was bom at Longasalza, in the Kingdom of Hanover, in 1733. He came to America Avith his parents in 1741, who settled in the Tulpe hocken Valley at a point east of where Womelsdorf is now situate. He was naturalized in September, 1 76 1. In June, 1776, he was one of the ten members of the Provincial Conference who represented Berks County in that important body; and in July following, he was selected as a delegate from the county to the Provincial Convention which was assembled for the purpose of framing a new government founded on the authority of the people. In 1776 and 1779 he repre sented the county in the Provincial Assembly. He was a resi- - ^ dent of Cum- ^.fe^^'U^Si^ '?'^:>^€eh^ ru township and a blacksmith by occupation. He offered his ser vices to the Government in the Revolutionary War, which were accepted, and he commanded a company of cavalry Associators for a time. He and his com pany participated in the Battle of Germantown, in October, 1777, where he was wounded. He was ap pointed Sub-Lieutenant of the county on March 21, 1777, and served in this office until his promotion to Lieutenant ofthe County in January, 1781. He con tinued to act as Lieutenant until the close of the war. While serving as Sub-Lieutenant, he also acted as a commissioner for the purchase of army supplies. In 1784, he was appointed judge of the Court of Common Pleas of the county and occupied this office 224 REVOLUTION. for a term of seven years, when, by the Constitution of 1790, a president judge of all the courts was ap pointed to take the place of the several judges. In the Pennsylvania Militia, he was brigade inspector for the county from April 11, 1793, for a period of 20 years. About the year 1816, he moved to the State of Virginia, and died at Winchester in December, 1821, in the 88th year ofhis age. CONRAD ECKERT. Conrad Eckert was born at Longasalza, in the Kingdom of Hanover, on February 6, 1741. During that year his father, John Eckert, emigrated from the place named to Pennsylvania, and settled in Heidel berg township, Lancaster (now Berks) County. He was brought up at farming, and when a young man became a blacksmith, which he pursued for some time. When the Revolution began, he was one ofthe active Associators of the county. As such he com manded a company which was raised in Heidelberg township, and became a part of the ist Battalion, commanded by Col. Henry Haller. This battalion marched to service in New Jersey in December, 1776, but the companies left and returned home without permission, because they had not been paid according to the terms of their enlistment. Captain Eckert is the ' ' Captain Echard ' ' mentioned by Gen'l Israel Putnam as one of the captains who informed him that ' ' their companies had run away to a man, excepting a lieutenant, sergeant and drummer." His company SKETCHES. 225 afterwards formed a part of Spyker's Battalion, and par ticipated in the. campaign at and about Germantown and White Marsh during the Fall of 1777. In this service, he was wounded in the battle at the for mer place, and his health in consequence became so impaired that he never fully recovered. Subsequently, in 1778 and 1780, his company was connected with the 4th Battalion of County Militia. Upon his return from military service, he carried on farming on the Eckert homestead, near Womels dorf, until his death, August 25, 1791. He was mar ried to Elizabeth Hain, a daughter of Hain, in Heidelberg township, by whom he had seven sons, John, Peter, George, David, Daniel, Solomon and Conrad, and two daughters, Catharine (married to Henry Co- penhaven), and Barbara (married to Daniel Reeser). His remains were buried in the graveyard connected with Hain's Church. Col. Valentine Eckert was an elder brother. GEORGE EGE. George Ege was bomMarch 9, 1748, and settled in Berks County about the year 1774, . when he became the sole owner of the Charming Forge, a prominent industry then situated on the Tulpehocken Creek, in Tulpe hocken (now Marion) township. During the Revolu tion he was an ardent patriot and supplied the Gov- 226 REVOLUTION. ernment with large quantities of cannon balls. He represented the county in the General Assembly for the years 1779, 1780 and 1782. Upon the adoption of the State Constitution of 1790, he was appointed an Associate Judge in 1791, and he served contin uously until 1 81 8, a period of twenty-eight years, when he resigned to devote his attention entirely to the management of his extensive business in the manu facture of iron. In 1804, he was the largest manufacturer and land owner in the county. Then he owned and carried on the Charming Forge with 4000 acres, Berkshire Fur nace with 6000 acres, Schuylkill Forge, near Port Clinton, with 6000 acres, and four large farms in Tul pehocken and Heidelberg townships, together con taining 1000 acres. In 1824, the assessed value of all his property was near $400,000. He died at his home on the Charming Forge prop erty, December 14, 1829, aged nearly 82 years. He had been actively engaged in business from 1774 to 1825, a period exceeding half a century, and for some years after he had reached the age of three score and ten. His remains were interred in the cemetery con nected with Zion's Church at Womelsdorf. His daughter Rebecca was married to Joseph Old, a prom inent iron inaster who carried on the Reading Fur nace in Chester County, and a son Michael was mar ried to Maria Margaretta Shulze, who was a daughter of Rev. Emanuel Shulze. Judge Ege was distinguished for great kindness of heart and humane impulses. Among his possessions were many slaves, numbering about forty, and he was SKETCHES. 227 always known to treat them with much consideration. Occasionally renegade slaves from the South found a comfortable home with him and also employment at one or other of his iron industries. A trusty slave, by the name of Tom Nelson, is particularly remembered for his integrity and devotion to the interests of his master, the Judge, having frequently been intrusted with large sums of money which he carried from Charming Forge to the bank at Reading. Judge Ege was then a director inthe "Bank of Deposit," the first bank at Reading. When Washington stopped at Womelsdorf in 1794 on his way to Carlisle, during the excitement growing out of the "Whiskey Insurrec tion," Tom was especially desirous of driving his master to Womelsdorf, not only to enable the Judge to pay his compliments to the great Revolutionary' hero and first President of the United States, but to afford himself the opportunity of seeing him. Judge Ege was personally known to Washington on account of his patriotic spirit during the Revolution, and of his prominence as a large manufacturer of iron, cannon balls, &c. BALSER GEEHR. Balser Geehr was born of German parentage at Germantown, near Philadelphia, on January 22, 1740, and removed to Amity township, in Berks County, when a young man. By the year 1767, he was living in Oley township, employed as a gunsmith. While in Oley, he was married to Catharine Hunter (laeger). 228 REVOLUTION. a daughter of Anthony laeger, and a sister of Col. Daniel Hunter. In 177 1, he purchased a large planta tion of nearly 500 acres in Bern township, several miles to the south of the Blue Mountain, and moved upon it in 1772. When the Revolution began, he was a man of large influence in the northern section of the county, and upon the selection of a Standing Committee in 1774, for a proper guidance of popular sentiment in its be half, he was naturally chosen to represent that sec tion on this important committee. In the formation of the Associators — j^ y of Pennsylvania, K- Y^€£yho^ Balser Geehr was /y one of the five del egates from Berks County who attended a meeting at Philadelphia in August, 1775. These delegates were known as the " Colonels of the Associated Battalions." He took an active part in the county militia. In 1775 and 1776 he was lieutenant-colonel of the 4th Battalion, which was composed of companies in the northern section of the county. In September, 1776, his battalion partic ipated in the campaign about New York, but I can not state what particular service was rendered. He officiated continuously as a judge of the county courts from 1775 to 1784, and represented the county in the General Assembty for the years 1782, 1786, and from 1792 to 1799. These positions show the popular esteem in which he was held. SKETCHES. 229 It is stated that he attended a levee given by Presi dent Washington in Independence Hall, in company with friends from Reading. In that day, cards were not commonly used but the names were announced. Upon arriving at the hall door, he gave his name upon request, and then it was called out to an usher at the first landing of the stairway, who in turn called it out again to another at the doorway of the assembly room, where it was again announced in a distinct manner. Not having been acquainted with the custom, this public use of his name excited him so that he ex claimed in a loud tone of voice — " Yes, yes, I'm com ing ; give me time," to the great amusement of other invited guests about him. He carried on farming extensively on the Bern plantation until 1796, and then removed to a farm of 231 acres in Maxatawny township, several miles north of Kutztown, which he had purchased shortly before. He died June 19, 1801, and his remains were interred in a private burying ground near the centre of the plantation last mentioned. By his decease without a last will, and the decease of his two sons John and Jacob also, and his two grand daughters (the children of Jacob), dying intestate without issue, the Maxatawny farm became involved in very tedious and costly ejectment litigation, cover ing a period of fifteen years. One of the cases in volving the trial is reported in Outerbridge Reports (Penna. State) vol. 9, p. 577, (1884); and another in Crumrine Reports, (Penna. State) vol. 28, p. 311 (1891). The trials excited much general interest 230 REVOLUTION. amongst the legal profession, and the cases reported are regarded as leading cases on the subject of title to land by descent. ALEXANDER GRAYDON. Alexander Graydon was born at Bristol, in Bucks County, Penn'a, on April 10, 1752. He went to Philadelphia while young and was educated principally at the Quaker school. He then studied law, but did not come to be admitted to the Bar at that place. He was a volunteer in the Revolution, and commanded a company in the Long Island campaign. In the capture of Fort Washington, he was taken prisoner. y y? r^i / Upon his release, Q-^-^^^^«^f^^lf%^^ he afterward went u' ^ to Reading and was admitted to the Bar on May 14, 1779. He car ried on practice for a time, then removed to Harris burg, where he died. May 2, 181 8. His remains were buried in the Old Pine Street Presbyterian Church burial ground at Philadelphia. While at Harrisburg, his memoirs were published in 1811. William Gray don, a practicing lawyer at that place, and the author of Graydon's Forms, was a brother. HENRY HALLER. Henry Haller was a tailor at Reading in 1765, and in 1775 was engaged as an innkeeper, by wliich time he had become a man of considerable social and polit- SKETCHES. 231 ical influence. In the formation of a regiment in Berks County, as its quota of the 4500 men for the Flying Camp, he was chosen Colonel, but he did not accompany the regiment in its march to Long Island, and did not participate in that battle. Shortly after ward, however, he commanded another battalion which went into service in New Jersey. In the public actions for encouraging the Revolu tion, he took a prominent part, and next to Edward Biddle, George Nagel, Jacob Morgan and Bodo Otto, was as prominent as any other man at Reading. He yfS^ ^^/O was a delegate to the Pro- ^7^ and also a member of the c/ Committee of Safety, the Committee on Attainder, and the Committee to Col lect Arms, etc. He served as a member of the Assem bly from 1776 to 1781. During the years 1778, 1779 and 1780, he was wagon-master of Berks County, and during 1779 and 1780, wagon- master-general of the Continental Army. The first public office that he filled was coroner of the county in 1767. After tlie Revolution, he moved up the Schuylkill Valley beyond the Blue Mountains, in Brunswick township, then still part of .Berks County, and there he died in September, 1793, possessed of a very large estate. He had eight sons, Frederick, Jacob, Henry, John, William, Isaac, Benjamin and Lewis ; and two daughters, Elizabeth (married to William Mears), and Sarah (married to Samuel Webb). 232 REVOLUTION. GABRIEL HIESTER. Gabriel Hiester, a son of Daniel Hiester and Catha rine Shueler (natives of Witzenstein, Westphalia), was born in Bern township June 17, 1749. He was brought up as a farmer and given such an edu cation as the neighborhood afforded at the school con nected with the Bern Church. In 1776, he was selected as one of the representatives from Berks County to the Provincial Convention for the formation of a Con stitution. In 1778 he received the appointment of justice of the Common Pleas Court of the county, which he held for four years. He was afterward elected to the Assembly, and represented the county for eight years, 1782, 1787-89, 1791 and 1802-04. yy He was in the As- ^^^^^ ritiLt; w ing a new Consti tution was discussed, but he voted against the pro priety of calling a convention for this purpose. He was Senator from the district which comprised Berks and Dauphin Counties for ten years, 1795-96 and 1805—12. This continued selection by his fellow-citi- citizens indicates their confidence in him as a man of ability and integrity. He died on his farm, in Bern township, September I, 1824. He was a brother of Col. Daniel Hiester, of Montgomery County ; of Col. John Hiester, of Chester County, and a cousin of Col. Joseph Hiester, of Berks County. HiSxwife was Elizabeth Bausman, who sur vived him eight years, dying in the 8 ist year of her SKETCHES. 233 age. He had four sons, Gabriel, Jonathan, William and Jacob, and two daughters, Mary (married to Fred erick A. Shulze), and Elizabeth. The family name was commonly written Hiester, but he wrote it, as given, Heister. JOSEPH HIESTER. Joseph Hiester was born in Bern township, Berks County, on November 18, 1752. His father, John ~— Hiester, emigrated to Pennsylvania in 1732, in the 25th year of his age, from the village of Elsoff", in the province of Westphalia, Germany, and some years afterward settled in Bern township, where he married Mary Barbara Epler, a daughter of one of the first settlers in that section of the county. The son was brought up on the farm until he was a young man. In the intervals of farm labor, he at tended the school at Bern Church, and there he ac quired the rudiments of an English and also a German education. The homestead was situated about a mile north of the church. He went to Reading before he was of age, and en tered the general store of Adam Witman. He re mained in the store until 1776, and then, manifesting an active sympathy for the Revolution, he was se lected as a delegate to the Provincial Conference. Upon returning home, he raised a company of men which be- 234 REVOLUTION. came a part of the "Flying Camp" in the regiment of Lt.-Col. Nicholas Lotz, and with it participated in the Battle of Long Island, where he was taken prisoner. Upon his exchange he returned to Reading, and after recovering from the effects of his imprisonment, he re joined the army. He participated in the battle of Germantown in 1777, and in 1780 commanded a regi ment which was in service in New Jersey for thirty days. About the close of the Revolution, he entered into partnership with his father-in-law, and some years afterward became the sole proprietor of the store. He conducted business operations very successfully for a number of years. Public affairs also received much of his attention. In 1787, he was elected a member of the General Assembly and re-elected twice. In 1789, he was chosen a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, and in 1790, the first State Senator from Berks County. In 1797, he was elected to represent this district in Congress and afterward re-elected five times. After an intermission of eight years, which he devoted entirely to business at Reading, he was again sent to Congress in 181 5, and re-elected twice. While holding this office, he became the nominee of the Federalist party for Governor in 181 7, and though not then elected, his popularity was shown in the vote which he received. He was the first candidate on the Federal ticket who received a majority of the votes in Berks County against the Democratic candi date, and also in the southeastern section ofthe State. The party naturally selected him in 1820 a second time as the most available candidate, and he» was SKETCHES. 235 elected. The election returns reveal the fact that the devotion of the people of Berks County caused his election. His numerous friends signalized this triumph by a grand festival at Reading on November I, 1820. His administration was characterized by great activity in promoting the growth of the Com monwealth, especially through internal improve ments. He suggested that such improvements could be made advantageously, and domestic manufac tures encouraged with success, and that there ex isted an imperative duty to support a liberal system of education. At the end ofhis term he lived in retire ment at Reading. He died June 10, 1832. His re mains were interred in the burying ground of the Re formed Church, and some years afterward removed to the Charles Evans Cemetery. He had a son, John S. Hiester, and four daughters. DANIEL HUNTER. The parents of ^-— ^ ^_ Daniel Hunter were ^ZJa...*tyUL^ (^(ooc^rv^^e/^c/ emigrants from Ger many, amongst the early settlers of Oley town ship. The name was laeger in German. He was born in this township on April 8, 1742, and carried on farming all his life. At the breaking out of the Revolution, he manifested an earnest interest in public aff"airs. His prominence and patriotic spirit led to his selection as a representative from the county to the Provincial Conference in June, 1776, and to 236 REVOLUTION. the Convention in July following. The Supreme Executive Council appointed him a paymaster of the militia in 1776, and he served in this position until August, 1777. In militia affairs he was particu larly prominent. In the Winter and Fall of 1777, he commanded a regiment of militia, formed of com panies from Oley and vicinity, -wfhich was engaged in the Revolutionary service, first in the campaign about Trenton, and then in the campaign about the Brandy wine. He represented the county in the General As sembly for the year 1782. While serving this office, he was taken ill, and from this illness he died at home, February 3, 1783, in the 41st year of his age. His wife was Maria Lease. He left three surviving children — Daniel, Frederick and Catharine (who was married to Jacob Kemp). His sister Catharine was the wife of Balser Geehr. THOMAS JONES, JR. Thomas Jones, Jr., was a son of Thomas Jones, an early Welsh settler in Cum ru township, who took up a large tract of land in 1735. He was born in 1742 in this township, and was brought up to farming. At the beginning of the Revolution, he assisted in organizing the Associators of Berks County, and was in active service for a time as a major in one of the bat talions. He was a member of the first Constitutional Convention from Berks County, and he also served as SKETCHES. 237 a county commissioner for two terms, from 1779 to 1782, and from 1783 to 1786. He died in 1800, aged 58 years. His residence was in Heidelberg township. He left one son, Samuel, and four daughters — Martha, Susanna, Sarah and Mary. JOHN LESHER. ' John Lesher was a native of Germany. He was born Janu ary 5, 171 1, the only son and heir-at-law of Nicholas Lesher. He emigrated to Pennsylvania in 1734, and was naturalized in 1743. He first settled in the upper section of Bucks County, but subse quently removed to Oley township, Berks County. Along the Manatawny Creek, near the Oley Churches, he, with two other men ( John Yoder and John Ross), erected a forge in 1744. This was known as the "Oley Forge." From that time, for a period of fifty years, he was prominently identified with the iron in dustry of Berks County. He represented the county in the Constitutional Convention of 1776, and served in the General Assembly from 1776 until 1782. While in the Convention, he was one of the important com mittee who prepared and reported the ' ' Declaration of Rights." During the Revolution, he acted as one of the Commissioners for purchasing army supplies. He addressed an interesting letter to the Supreme 238 REVOLUTION. Executive Council in 1778, relating to the taking of supplies from him. [See p. 181.] He died in Oley township April 5, 1794, aged 83 years. He left a wife, two sons, John and Jacob ; and five daughters — Barbara (married to Jacob Morgan), Hannah (married to George Focht), Maria (married to John Potts, Jr.), Catharine (married to John Tysher), and Elizabeth. DANIEL LEVAN. ^.___/^ Daniel Levan was <^^2).2^v.-*^o^2/a^^.^ the son of Daniel Levan, of Maxa tawny township, in Berks County, who died in June, 1777. He was born in that township, and, after hav ing been brought up on a farm, removed to Reading. He studied law with Edward Biddle, Esq., on whose motion he was admitted to practice in the several courts of Berks County on November 11, 1768. He officiated as the sheriff" of the county during the years 1778 and 1779, and as the county treasurer from 1780 to 1783. His residence was situated on the south-east corner of 5th and Cherry streets, and there he died in March, 1792, leaving to survive him four sons, Isaac, Daniel, Jacob and Samuel. SEBASTIAN LEVAN. Sebastian Levan was born in Maxatawny township, Berks County. He was a son of Jacob Levan, one of SKETCHES. 239 the first judges of the County from 1752 to 1762. He was raised on his father's farm and learned the trade of miller, which he afterward carried on for him self At the breaking out of the Revolution, he rep resented his district on the /? ^ y^ Standing Committee. Sub- ^1^^^^^c^*^^^^a*cp sequently, he served in the -^"^'-^ \_ the State Assembly during ^ 1779 and 1780, and as a Councillor on the Supreme Executive Council from 1782 to 1784. He was also active in the County Militia, being colonel of a bat talion. He died in August, 1794. ABRAHAM LINCOLN. Abraham Lincoln was a son of Mordecai and Mary Lincoln. He was bom a posthumous son in 1736, in Exeter to-wnship, Berks County, (then part of Phila delphia County). His father — who died in May of that year, a fe-w months before his birth — was the paternal ancestor of Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States. He was brought up on a farm and received a fair education. Prior to the Revolution, he served as a county commissioner from 1772 to 1775, and continued in office byre-election until 1778. On March 21, 1777, he was appointed one of the sub-lieu tenants of the county, but it is not known how long he served in this position. 240 REVOLUTION. He represented the county in the General Assembly from 1782 to 1786, and was a delegate to the Pennsyl vania Convention to ratify the Federal Constitution in 1787. He did not sign the ratification. He was also a member ofthe Constitutional Convention of 1789— 90. He died'at his residence in Exeter township, Jan uary 31, 1806, in the 70th year of his age. In 1761, he married Anne Boone, a daughter of James Boone and Mary Foulke. She was a full cousin of Col. B^ i^ply- ftome s-PIincolrvQ.- Daniel Boone, the Pioneer of Kentucky. The Boones were Quakers and the Lincolns Congregationalists. Hence it appears by the minutes of the Exeter Meet ing, October 27, 1761, that she " condoned" her mar riage to one who was not a member of the Society. He left four sons, Mordecai, James, Thomas and John, and five daughters, Mary (married to Joseph Boone), Martha, Ann (married to William Glassgow), Anna, and Phebe (married to David Jones). The above cut represents the building where the children of Mordecai Lincoln, Sr., were born. It is SKETCHES. 241 situated about a mile below Exeter Station, several hundred feet north from the railroad, near a small stream. An extension was built to the west end. JACOB LIVINGOOD. Jacob Livingood, a captain of a company of riflemen during the Revolution in 1781, was born in Tulpe hocken township, Berks County, on January 26, 1752, on the property commonly known as the " Livingood Mill," which is situated on a branch of the Little Swatara, within a mile of its outlet into that stream. His father and grandfather, both of the same name, had lived there for a number of years, the latter hav ing migrated from New York in 1729 with a small colon}' of Germans, under the leadership of Conrad Weiser. He was brought up to farming and milling. In the Fall of 1781, he raised a company of rifle men at and near Womelsdorf for the Continental Army, which was in service for ninety days. Upon his discharge and return home, he resumed his avocation as a miller. For some years afterward, he was en gaged in the grain business, disposing of the grain collected at Philadelphia. He was also at Reading for a time. Subsequently, he returned to Tulpehocken ahd lived by himself in a small log building, which was erected by members of the family expressly for him, on the Mill premises, where he frequently enter tained the surviving members of his company. It is stated that the meetings of his Continental associates were occasions of great hilarity, and he always wel- 242 REVOLUTION. coined them in his military uniform. So proud was he of this dress that he died with it on; and out of respect for his known wishes, he was thus laid to rest in the burying ground of the Lutheran Church, a mile west of Stouchsburg. The day of his decease is not known. NICHOLAS LOTZ. Nicholas Lotz was born February 20, 1740, in the Palatinate, and emigrated to Pennsylvania when a young man. He first settled in the western section of the county. Some time previous to the Revolu tion, he located at Reading and became the owner of two mills at the mouth of the Wyomissing Creek, which he conducted very successfully. When the struggle for independence began, he was prominently identified with the patriotic movement at Reading. In January, 1775, he was selected as chairman of the Standing Committee. He served as a delegate to the Provincial Conference in June, 1776, and upon his return home took an active part in the enlistment of men. He was commissioned a lieutenant-colonel and participated in the campaign of the " Flying Camp " at New York, where he was engaged in the battle of Long Island and taken prisoner. He was admitted to parole within certain bounds on April 16, 1777, and exchanged on September 10, 1779. He showed great interest in Militia afi'airs, being at the head of the battalion in the central section of the county from 1775 for many years. SKETCHES. 243 In 1780 he was appointed Commissioner of Forage, and, as such, purchased supplies for the army until the close of the war. The Executive Council ad dressed him as a Colonel and so recognized him. Col. Lotz represented Berks County in the General Assembly from 1784 to 1786, and again from 1790 to 1794 ; . and he filled the office of Associate- Judge of the county from 1795 to 1806. Gov. Thomas Mifflin gave him the appointment, there having been great intimacy between them. 244 REVOLUTION. When Gen'l Washington, while President, was at Reading, on his way to Carlisle, in 1794, Col. Lotz was at the head of a party of prominent men who signalized the occasion by giving a military parade on Penn Square in honor of the distinguished visitor. The review was made from the second stor}' of the "Federal Inn" (now the Farmer's Bank building). In personal appearance, he was a tall, finely-propor tioned man, being over six feet in height and weigh ing about 300 pounds ; and upon that occasion he attracted marked attention, not only by reason of his commanding presence, but also of his military, political and social prominence. Federal Inn, Penn Square, Reading. He died November 28, 1807, and left to survive him eight children : seven sons, Philip, Nicholas, SKETCHES. 245 Jacob, John, Henry, Michael and William, and a daughter, Rosa (married to John Yeager). His re mains were buried in the graveyard of the Reformed Church, and from thence removed to the Charles Evans Cemetery. CHRISTIAN LOWER. Christian Lower was of German descent. In that language the name was spelled Lauer, but in writing it himself he spelled it Lower. The name of his father. Christian Lauer, appears in the list of families that migrated from Schoharie in New York to Tulpehocken in 1723, and his grand father, Michael Lauer, followed in 1728. He was born in Tulpehocken township and brought up to the trade of a blacksmith. He took ^^7 , _yt_' ' V^ an active part in the (^^^rC^^ZcU^ <:sJo'. The remains of both father and son were interred in the burying ground of Tulpehocken Church. JOHN LUDWIG. ^z^^^.C^fl^Od^'C^ John Lud wig was a son of Dan'l Lud wig, the eld er, of Heidel berg township, where he was born, and raised at farm ing. At the opening of the Revolution, he was a man of prominence in the central section of the count}'. He raised a company of men, which formed part of the " Flying Camp" in Lotz's Battalion, and it appears that he and his company were subsequenth' engao-ed in the battles of Trenton and Princeton. He also SKETCHES. 247 commanded a company which comprised part of Hies ter's Battalion in 1780, that was with Reed's Army in New Jersey. He was commissioned a justice of the peace in 1777, and recommissioned in 1784. He was a delegate to the Pennsylvania Convention to ratify the Federal Consti tution in 1787, but, with his colleagues, did not sign the ratification. He served in the General Assembly in 1782-83, and again in 1788-90 ; and he also served as a member of the Pennsylvania House of Represen tatives from 1790 to 1793. In 1795, Gov. Mifflin ap pointed him a justice ofthe peace, and he was still in commission at the time ofhis death in July, 1802. JACOB MORGAN. Jacob Morgan was the most prominent Revolutionary character of Berks County from 1777 to 1780, and as such brought great credit to the county and great honor to himself He was born in the district or shire of Csernarvon, in the northern part of Wales, in 1716, and emigrated with his father, Thomas Morgan, to Pennsylvania some time previous to 1730. About that time a colony of Welsh people, including Thomas Morgan and his family, migrated up the Schuylkill Valley from Phila delphia to the mouth of the French Creek, and thence along and beyond the headwaters of that creek until they reached the headwaters of the Conestoga Creek, in Csernarvon township. There they settled and took 248 REVOLUTION. up large tracts of land. That section of territory was then a part of Lancaster County, but since 1752 a part of Berks County. The tract taken up by his father was in the vicinity of Morgantown. It in cluded the town plan which he subsequently came to lay out in 1770, and which he named after the family, a custom quite common in that day throughout the county. When the French and Indian War came to aff"ect Pennsylvania in 1755, Jacob Morgan was 39 years old, and until that time had been engaged at farming. In December of that year, he was commissioned as a captain under the Provincial Government, and he con tinued actively engaged in this military service until 1760, when he returned home and resumed farming. For his services, he became entitled to 3000 acres of land by proclamation of the King of Great Britain in 1763, but it would seem that he did not take up the land, for in his last will he devised his right to the grant to four of his children. When the Revolution began, he was nearly 60 years of age. In June, 1776, he was selected to represent the county as a delegate to the Provincial Con ference, and in July following as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention; and in 1777, upon the creation of the office of Lieutenant of the several counties for the purpose of aiding the Executive SKETCHES. 249 Council in effectively prosecuting the war, he was selected by the Council to fill this very important position. This evidences his distinguished character, for at that time Berks County possessed a number of prominent and influential men. In the prompt and faithful performance of his duties, he was very suc cessful, the Executive Council in their letters to him frequently complimenting his energy in having the county to promptly fill the numerous orders for troops. He resigned in December, 1780. While filling this office, he was always recognized as a colonel, and was addressed as such by the Executive Council. He officiated as a judge of the county for the years 1768, 1769, 1772, and from 1774 to 1777 ; and as a justice of the peace for the southern district of Berks County, which included Csernarvon township, from 1777 to 1791, by appointment for two consecutive terms of seven years each. A story, illustrating his courage and self-possession at an advanced age, is told of him after his retire ment to Morgantown. About the year 1784, one evening, while seated in his sleeping room on the first floor, three masked men entered and demanded his money or his life. He refused in a positive manner, and one of them struck him on the head with a club, which caused him to fall and roll under the bed. In falling, the table (at which he sat) was upset and the light extinguished. Just then an indentured girl, "Patty Barefoot," who was in the room, hid from fear behind the bed, took his sword (which la^ on a projecting ledge of the partition several feet from the floor) and handed it to him, when he arose sud- 250 REVOLUTION. denly, struck out violentl}' in the darkness to the right and left upon the heads and across the backs of the intruders, and thus drove them away. He died at Morgantown on November 11, 1792, at the age of 76 years, and was buried in the graveyard of the St. Thomas Episcopal Church at that place. He left a last will, by which it appears that he died possessed of a large estate, including over 700 acres of farming and wood land in Berks County, and the right to over 7000 acres of land by virtue of grants from the Government. He had two sons, Jacob and Benjamin ; and three daughters, Sarah (married to Jenkins), Mar}' (married to Nicholas Hudson), and Rebecca (married to John Price, an attorney at Reading). Rachel, a daughter of John Price, was married to Samuel Weth- erill in 1788. JACOB MORG.^N, JR. Jacob Morgan, a son of Jacob Morgan, and com monly known as Jacob Morgan, Jr., was born in Cser narvon township, Berks County, in 1742. At the age of 16 years, he was appointed an ensign, and served in the French and Indian War at Fort Augusta, then on the extreme northern frontiers of Berks County. He also accompanied the second expedition against Fort Duquesne ; and in 1760, he was a lieutenant in the 2nd Battalion of Associators, acting as an adjutant under the command of Col. Hugh Mercer. At an early age he went to Philadelphia, and, after clerking for a while, became a successful merchant. SKETCHES. 251 When the Revolution began, he was a man of promi nence. On December 4, 1776, the Executive Coun cil of Pennsylvania appointed him Colonel of the ist Battalion of Associators of the City of Philadelphia and Northern Liberties. He and his battalion were 252 REVOLUTION. engaged in the Battle of Princeton, and there on the field, he received the sword of his friend, Gen'l Mercer, while attending him in his dying moments ; and shortly afterward they also participated in the Battle of Monmouth. The Executive Council selected him for the posi tion of Lieutenant of the City of Philadelphia, but he declined this appointment, doubtless, because he con templated changing his residence to Reading, for I find that, in September, 1777, he became the repre sentative from Berks County in the Board of Execu tive Council. This election would indicate that he had moved there some time in April or May. He continued to serve as a Councillor until April 14, 1778, when he was selected to be the Quartermaster- General of the county, and then, thinking that by ac cepting this appointment he could render more service to his country, he resigned. In 1780, he was also appointed Superintendent of the Commissioners of purchases for the army, and of the Wagon-Masters of the State ; and he served these three highly respon sible positions in a most faithful and satisfactory manner until the close of the Revolution. Certain deeds, conveying real estate in Berks County to and from him in 1779, describe his residence as of Reading. The letters to him from the Executive Council, which are published in the Colonial Records, were addressed to him at Reading, and those from him to the Council were dated at Reading, the dates of both extending from 1777 to 1782. Shortly after the war, he returned to Philadelphia. A deed from him for land in Berks County, dated in SKETCHES. • 253 1791, describes him as a merchant at that place. He was then, and continued until the time of his decease, engaged in business with his son-in-law, Andrew Douglass, under the firm name of Douglass & Morgan. It is said that this firm was one of the first to manu facture refined sugar at Philadelphia. He died on September 18, 1802, in the 6 ist year of his age, and his remains were interred in the burying- ground of Christ Church, at the corner of Fifth and Arch streets, in which were buried the remains of many distinguished men. Col. Morgan was married to Barbara Jenkins, of Reading, by whom he had six children: Rachel (mar ried to Andrew Douglass), Elizabeth (married to Wil liam Sergeant), George, John, Jacob and Hannah — the last three dying, while young, of yellow fever at Philadelphia in 1793. DAVID MORGAN. David Morgan was a brother of Col. Jacob Morgan. He was born on the Morgan homestead and raised on the farm. He participated in the Revolution by act- ^j).:,^>UJ(o' ing on several local committees, being one of the Com mittee to seize the property of Tories in the county, and one of the Committee to vest the title to forfeited 254 REVOLUTION. estates. Upon the decease of his brother, the Colonel, he was appointed to the office of justice of the peace of the district, and he continued to fill this position until his decease. He always resided at Morgantown, and died there in July, 1812. Four children survived him, Elizabeth (married to IMichael Bower), James, David and John. GEORGE NAGEL. Joachim Nagel was born at Eisenberg, a town situ ated three miles from Coblentz, in the southern dis trict of the Rhenish Province, on February 21, 1706. He married a young woman of that vicinity, and had by her four sons, George, Frederick, Peter and John ; and two daughters, Margaret (married to Geyer), and Catharine (married to Elias Youngman). How many of the children were born there, I was not able to ascertain. By way of anticipating his emigration, he sent his eldest son, George, to Penn sylvania in 1748 for the purpose of examining the country. The report was evidently favorable, for he and his wife, and the children still with him, emi grated in 1 75 1, landing at Philadelphia in the Fall of that year. Thence he went to Berks County, where he settled on a tract of land situated in Douglass township, at the confluence of the Manatawny creek and its lower tributary, the Ironstone, and erected a grist mill, which he carried on until his death, July 26, 1795, in the 90th year of his age. SKETCHES. 255 George Nagel was born at Eisenberg, about the year 1728. He located at Reading about 1755, and engaged at blacksmithing. He was enlisted in the French and Indian War as an ensign, and for a time was stationed at Fort Augusta. ^,.—^^ He continued in service /? 1/ /^ ' until the close of the war ^.^f^l!i!^^ in 1763, when he returned , ^^ ' to Reading and resumed his trade. When the Revo lution began, he was imbued with a high patriotic spirit, and raised the first company of men in Berks County, which participated in the Massachusetts cam paign at and about Cambridge. He continued in active service until 1783, rising to the rank of colonel. [See page yy:] Upon his return to Reading, he engaged in the mercantile business, which he carried on until his death in March, 1789. The inventory in the settle ment of his estate shows many unpaid book accounts. His remains were buried in the Reformed graveyard. He was married to Rebecca, a daughter of Mordecai Lincoln, of Exeter township, by whom he had two children, a son, Jacob, and a daughter, who was mar ried to Thomas McCartle, of Westminster, Maryland. PETER NAGEL. Peter Nagel was one of the four sons of Joachim Nagel. He was born October 31, 1750, at Eisen berg, and emigrated with his father to Douglass town- 256 REVOLUTION. ship, in Berks County, Penn.s>'lvania, in September, 1751. When a young man, he moved to Reading 4^ cAW-^ and learned the trade of hatter, scr\-iiig an appren ticeship of seven Near.-^ under Samuel Jack.-ion, the first hat manufacturer at Readino-. He carried on SKETCHES. 257 this occupation for some years as a journeyman, and then as a successful manufacturer until 1804. He was prominently identified with the County Militia during the Revolution, his name appearing as a captain in the Returns from 1777 to 1783. The company under his command guarded prisoners of war at Reading upon different occasions. He was ap pointed a justice ofthe peace in 1793 by Gov. Thomas Mifflin (who was a warm personal friend), and he con tinued to serve this position by reappointment until his decease, a period covering over forty years. In 1803, when the County of Berks was divided into dis tricts for justices of the peace, Reading was made the first district, and Peter Nagel was selected as one of the four appointees. He also offlciated as coroner of the county from 1781 to 1787, and as treasurer of Reading from 1815 to 1828. His son, Peter Nagel, officiated as county treasurer from 1835 to 1843 ; his grandson, Henry Nagel, from 1843 to 1845, and his great-grandson. Dr. Hiester M. Nagel, from 1873 to 1875. When Washington was at Reading in 1794, Peter Nagel participated in the review of the military parade in honor of the distinguished visitor. Upon that oc casion he held a reception at his residence (which was situated on North Fifth street, east side, on the sec ond lot south of Washington, now constituting the lower half of the Post Office property), to enable the citizens to meet the great hero of the Revolution. Another incident is that he and his eldest daughter, Elizabeth, attended one of Washington's receptions at Philadelphia. 258 REVOLUTION. Capt. Nagel was a portly man, nearly six feet tall, of fine personal appearance and commanding pres ence. He died November 30, 1834, and his remains were interred in the Reformed burying-ground, whence they were removed to Charles Evans Ceme tery. He was married twice, first to Barbara Ann Imler, with whom he had eight children : one who died in infancy ; Elizabeth (married to William Old, who was a grandson of Baron Henry William Stiegel), Sarah (married to Jacob R. Boyer), Mary (married to George Buehler), Rebecca (married to Nicholas Cole man,) Catharine (married to Isaac Kimmel), Peter Nagel and George Nagel ; and then to the widow of Isaac High (who was the daughter pf William Hotten stein, and the mother of Gen'l William High, a prom inent man of the Militia of Berks County), with whom he had three children : Harriet (married to Daniel Mears), Susan (married to Jacob Boyer), and John High Nagel. BODO OTTO. Next to Washington, Gates, Miffiin, Wayne and other leading generals. Dr. Bodo Otto, of Reading, occupied a prominence and rendered useful services equal to any other man who was engaged in the great cause of the Revolution, not on the field of battle, leading his fellows into danger and death, but amongst the hospitals as a senior surgeon, caring for and ad ministering to the sick, wounded and dying soldiers. And yet his name is not mentioned in history ! He was born of distinguished parentage in 1709, in the Kingdom of Hanover, Germany, and was especially SKETCHES. 259 educated as a surgeon under the authority of the Gov ernment in the University of Goettingen. In 1755, ." "-N ¦y,- \\ ^ if he emigrated with his family from Amsterdam, and landed at Philadelphia, where he practiced his pro- 26o REVOLUTION. fession very successfully until 1773, when he re moved to Reading. When the Revolution began. Dr. Otto took a prom inent part in the public demonstrations ; and in the selection of delegates from Berks County to the Pro vincial Conference in 1776, the people naturally looked to him as a thoroughly qualified man. This was the only representative position that he was en abled to take, for when the struggle began in earnest, and hospitals had to be established, he was appointed a senior surgeon of the hospitals in the Colonies. This was certainly bearing his share of responsibility in the cause, and all his time was evidently taken up in the proper performance of his duty. During the gloomy and discouraging Winter of 1777-78, while the army lay encamped at Valley Forge, he was in charge of the camp hospital, and was assisted by his two sons, Bodo and John Augustus. Toward the close, the fol lowing meritorious certificate was issued to him by the Director of Military Hospitals : "This is to certifj' that Dr. Bodo Otto served in the capacity of a senior surgeon in the Hospitals of the United States in the year 1770, and when the new arrangement, in April, 1777, took place, he was continued in that station until the subsequent arrange ment of September, 1780, when he was appointed hospital phjsi- cian and surgeon, in which capacitj' he ofldciated until a reduc tion of a number of the officers of said department, in Januarj', 1782, was made. During the whole of the time he acted in the above stations he discharged his duty with great faithfulness, care and attention. The humanitj', for which he was distinguished, towards the brave American soldieiy, claims the thanks of every lover of his countiy, and the success attending his practice will be a suflicient recommendation of his abilities in his profession. Given under my hand, the 30th day of January, 1782. "John Cochbak, ' ' Director of the Military Hospitals. ' ' SKETCHES. 261 In the beginning of 1782, after serving as senior surgeon for nearly six years, he resumed his practice at Reading, though then 73 years of age, and carried it on until his death in 1787. His remains were interred in the Trinity Lutheran Church lot at the western end of the building. He was married three times, and among the children surviving were Bodo Otto, Jr., and John Augustus Otto, who were brought up in the same profession and became distinguished as medical practitioners. He resided on the north side of Penn Square, midway between Fifth' and Sixth streets. JOHN A. OTTO. John Augustus Otto, a son of Dr. Bodo Otto, was born in Hanover, Germany, on July 30, 1751, and emigrated with his father to Philadelphia in 1755. While living at the latter place, he was given a thor ough education and specially prepared to practice medicine and surgery. When his father removed to Reading in 1773, ^^ he accompanied '^Z^r^ (^ the family. Dnr- /-'^^/V, ing the Revolu- ^-^ < --"'^ tion, he assisted his father in surgical operations and in attending the military hospitals. After the Revolution, he estab lished a large practice at Reading and was recognized as an eminent physician. He served as a justice of the peace of Reading from 1785 to 1789, and in 1790 he filled the office of prothonotary. 262 REVOLUTION. He was married to Catharine Hitner, of Montgom ery County, and died December 14, 1834. His chil dren were Dr. John B. Otto, Daniel H. Otto, Marga ret (married to Benjamin Witman), Mary (married to Hon. Gabriel Hiester), Sarah (married to Jonathan Hiester, Esq., an attorney at Reading), Elizabeth (married to Henry Richards), and Maria (married to Joseph Wood). JOHN PATTON. In the transfer of real estate in Berks County, John Patton is described as residing at Reading in 1764, and in 1782. In the campaign beginning with the Battle of Long Island, he commanded a regiment, but the only mention of it was found in connection with the march of the company of Capt. John Lesher from Womelsdorf by way of Kutztown and the East Penn Valley, to Perth Amboy in 1776. The. regimental officers were from Tulpehocken and Heidelberg town ships. In 1774, John Patton was assessed in Heidelberg township. By the amount of the assessment, he was evidently a rich property owner. He was married to the widow of William Bird, and was interested in the manufacture of iron. By the Colonial Records, it ap pears that he supplied the Continental Army with cannon balls. He officiated as a Judge of the county courts from 1770 to 1777, excepting 1776, when he was absent in the Long Island campaign ; and he represented the SKETCHES. 263 county in the General Assembly for the years 1780 and 1782. I think he came from Philadelphia and was an elderly man at the time, judging from his marriage to the widow of William Bird, but where he went to after 1782, I have not been able to ascertain. A Col. John Patton is mentioned in the Pennsyl vania Archives, but from the sketch given there it would seem that he was a different man from the John Patton who lived in Berks County. JONATHAN POTTS. Jonathan Potts was born in the lower part of Berks County, April 11, 1745. After obtaining a good edu cation at Ephrata and Philadelphia, he went to Edin burgh, 1766. He was accompanied by Benjamin Rush. They carried letters of introduction from Ben jamin Franklin. Potts returned in 1767, and gradu ated at the Medical Institute of Philadel- '^^1^ -f*^ "^^ phia, at its first com mencement in 1768. He delivered the val edictory oration, and was highly complimented. He began the practice of medicine at Reading and be came a noted practitioner. He wrote an article on "Utility of Vaccination " in 1 771, which was pub lished in Pennsylvanien Staatsbote. He mentioned the time small-pox visited Reading, and that 106 children died — one in three who had the disease. 264 REVOLUTION. He exhibited great patriotism during the Revolu tion, and represented Berks County at Philadelphia on several important occasions during 1775 and 1776. In the beginning, he was Secretary of the Committee on Correspondence, and after the movement in behalf of the Revolution was thoroughly started, he became prominently identified with the surgical department of the army. In June, 1776, he was appointed Sur geon for the Continental Army in Canada and at Lake George. In December, 1776, he was stationed at Philadelphia, and in April, 1777, at Albany. While there, he was Director-General of the hospitals of the Northern Department. Through his zeal in public service, he was prostrated by illness. He died at Reading in October, 1781, and left to survive him a widow and five children : three sons, Benjamin, Fran cis and Edward ; and two daughters, Mary and Debo rah. He was a brother of Samuel Potts, Esq., of Pottsgrove, Montgomery County. COLLINSON READ. Collinson Read was /JO,/, y^ one ofthe early leading ^'-+''^nion^km^<^teiZ^:t^ attorneys of the Bar at \/_^ '" ' Reading. He was ad mitted to practice on August 13, 1772. "He distinguished himself as a profound lawyer, and his publications will be remem bered in Pennsylvania with high regard, as well by SKETCHES. 265 the merchant and private gentleman, as by the mem bers of the Bar. He was of extensive erudition in the Greek, Latin, French and German languages. In this accomplished gentleman, there was a peculiar kindness of heart that disarmed all enmity in his op ponents, and his exertions of friendship, whether in or out of the profession, were ever judicious and such as made him beloved by all his acquaintances. He died of pleurisy on March 2, 1815, aged 62 years, after an illness of only two days." — {Weekly Advertiser, March 4, 18 ij.) He officiated as register of wills of the county in 1775 and 1776. The Standing Committee selected him as their secretary in 1775, and he served this po sition until the close of the Revolution. JAMES READ. James Read was born at Philadelphia. He came to y^mS/y^zP Reading upon the erection /v ^1 of Berks County in 1752 ; /C^— — — _-«:;:^^Z^ and, by appointment from Ci_^-^^^^'^-l^ the Provincial Govern ment, filled the county offices of prothonotary, recorder, register, clerk of Orphans' Court and clerk ofthe Quar ter Sessions continuously from 1752 to 1776. He was one of the first attorneys admitted to the Bar at Read ing, and also practiced his profession while filling the offices named. The official records are in his own handwriting and indicate that he was a man of careful 266 REVOLUTION. habits. He officiated as one of the justices of the county courts under the Provincial Government, and served as a member of the Supreme Executive Coun cil for one term, from 1778 to 1781. He resigned the office June 4, 1781, "on account of considerations of duty to his family," and his resignation was ac cepted the next day. It would seem that he was after a higher office, for, on June 5th, he was one of six applicants for the position of Register of the Court of Admiralty and succeeded in making the appointment Subsequently, in 1787, he was again elected as a Councillor from Berks County, and continued until 1790. Under the Constitution of 1776, he was elected in 1783 as a Censor to represent Berks County in the Council of Censors, who were " to inquire whether the Constitution was preserved inviolate in every part." On April 22, 1785, he was appointed flour inspector of Philadelphia, and reappointed on April 22, 1789. The numerous positions filled by him indicate that he was a man of recognized ability. He owned a number of properties at Reading at different times. I think he located at Philadelphia after 1790 and died there. WILLIAM REESER. William Reeser Avas born in Bern township and car ried on farming for a time. He officiated as a county commissioner from 1757 to 1760, and after that time located at Reading. In the beginning of the Revolution, he participated in SKETCHES. 267 the public meeting at Reading on July 2, 1774, and he was selected as one of the Committee of Corre spondence. In September, 1775, he presided at a meeting of divers inhabitants of the county, held at Reading, who had conscientious scruples against war, but expressed a willingness to contribute towards carrying it. on. He also served as one of the Judges ofthe county courts from 1778 to 1784. During this time, he was busy in preparing last wills, for his name appears as a witness to many of them, indicating that he was a scrivener. His handwriting was very legible and rather bold. He died at Reading in June, 1785. His residence occupied the site of the First National Bank, on Penn Square below Sixth street. CHRISTOPHER SCHULTZ. Christopher Schultz was one of the Mennonite family of that name in Hereford township, where they had settled at a very early period in the history of the county. When the Revolution began, he was a man of great prominence n /^ in that section, and (%-i/t^pAe/rjJcA evidently interest- ^ / ed in the popular movement for Independence, for he attended the first public meeting at Reading, on July 2, 1774, and was appointed on the Committee of Correspondence. On December 5th, following, he was placed on the Com mittee of Observation. He also officiated as a justice ofthe peace ofthat district for one term from 1777 to 1784, and died on September 28, 1789. 268 REVOLUTION. EDWARD SCULI.. Edward Scull (son of Nicholas Scull, Surveyor- General of Pennsylvania), was born at Philadelphia on October 26, 1716. He was educated to pur sue surveying, and was the county surveyor of Northampton County before 1752. He lo cated at Reading short ly after the erection of Berks County, and con tinued to follow survey ing until the breaking out of the Revolution, when he turned his attention to military life. He became a captain and raised several companies at Reading. On May 16, 1778, he was appointed Secretary of the Board of War. He died at Reading, but I could not ascertain the exact time. PETER SCULL. Peter Scull, one of the captains from Reading in the Revolution, was born at Philadelphia in Decem ber, 1753. He was the eldest son of James Scull, a surveyor, and was educated to be an attorney-at-law. In January, 1776, while residing at Reading, he was commissioned as a captain in the 3rd Pennsylvania Regiment. Subsequently, he was aid-de-camp to Gen'l Washington at the Battle of White Plains, and he showed such a high degree of accomplishment and gal lantry that the General recommended him to Congress SKETCHES. 269 as a worthy candidate for the office of Secretary of the Board of War. He received the appointment on July 17, 1779. Before this he had served as a major in the regiment commanded by Col. John Patton, his commission having been issued on January 11, 1777. His health failing, he was ordered to go abroad by his physician, and he left Chester for France on October 20, 1779, on the frigate " Confederacy." On the way, he died at sea, December 4, 1779. Shortly before, (No vember 23), he executed a last will, wherein he made the following bequests: To his friend. Dr. Jonathan Potts, the thanks of a dying man ; to Alexander Gray- dan, his pocket pistols ; to George Lux, the sword which was given to him by his honored father-in-law, friend and protector, Edward Biddle ; to Col. Morgan Conner, his green-hilted hanger ; and to Col. John Pat ton, of Philadelphia, his silver buckles. CHARLES SHOEMAKER. Charles Shoemaker was born at Germantown about the year 1735. His grandfather emigrated to this country with Pastorius and settled in the vicinity of Germantown. About the year 1765, he moved to Windsor township, Berks County, and took up a considerable quantity of land. He exerted a large in fluence in politics and business in the upper section 270 REVOLUTION. of the county. He represented the county in the Provincial Conference, and also in the Constitu tional Convention of 1776. In 1777, he was ap pointed as one of the justices of the peace of the county for seven years, and at the expiration of his term he was reappointed, serving, doubtless, till the adoption of the Constitution of 1790 ; and he also offi ciated as a Judge of the courts from 1785 to 1790. The State Assembly in December, 1777, appointed and empowered him to solicit and take subscriptions for the Continental Loan, this service having required a large measure of ability to conduct the duties of the office with success. He succeeded in obtaining a con siderable amount of subscriptions from various citizens of the county. At the close of the war, much loss was suffered by farmers and merchants from non- redemption of these loans. The people exhibited their patriotism to the country by lending their aid in its , extremity. In November, 1777, he acted as one of the Commissioners who assembled at New Haven, in Connecticut, to regulate the price of commodities in the Colonies. He represented the county in the General Assembly for twelve years — 1792 to 1801, in 1810 and in 1812 ; and in the Senate for four years — 1813 to 1816. After living a retired life for several years, he died in April, 1820, leaving to survive him five sons, Samuel, Charles, Jacob, Benjamin and John ; and three daugh ters, Sophia (married to Jacob Huy), Catharine (mar ried to Jacob Dunkle), and Mary (mamed to Benjamin Kepner). SKETCHES. 271 JACOB SHOEMAKER. Jacob Shoemaker, an elder brother of Charles Shoe maker, was bom at Germantown. He became a resi dent of Reading some time before 1 768. In that year, he was elected sheriff" of Berks County, and he was commissioned for three years. His residence was on Penn street above Sixth (now No. 607). Being a man of considerable prominence, he was selected in Decem ber, 1774, as one of the Committee of Observation. He died at Reading in September, 1783, and left a widow, (afterward married to John Kurtz), and five daughters, Catharine (married to Conrad Foose), Mary (married to Henry Row), Hannah (married to Christo pher Nagel), Christiana and Sophia. JOHN SODER. John Soder was born in Bern township, Berks County, where his father, Nicholas Soder, had settled in the early history of that district of territory, having emigrated from Berne, Switzerland, in 1735 ; and he was brought up to farming, which occupation he pursued until his decease. He served as a captain four different times in the Revolution, each time for a period of sixty days, in 272 REVOLUTION. different years. The record of his enlistments was obtained from the Pension Office of the United States. His name appears in the Militia Returns of 1777 as a captain of the 5th company in the 3rd Battalion, com manded by Col. Michael Lindemuth ; but I could not find it in any other connection with the military affairs of the Revolution. The evidence of his service, how ever, is unmistakable. Unfortunately, the pension records previous to 181 2 were destroyed by the British ^ when they took posses- ^>^>^ Ip/LAA- ^''°^ °^ Washington. V^^^ '^ a^!fJ^ From therecord of Capt. Soder, I am led to sa}' that there were other enlistments similar to his, but they have not as yet been ascertained. He died in April, 181 7, possessed of a considerable estate, and left to survive him twelve children : four sons, John, Daniel, Jacob and Samuel ; and eight daughters, Barbara (married to Peter Noecker), Marga ret (married to John Haas), Mary (married to Jacob Zardman), Elizabeth, Sallie, Henrietta, Esther and Hannah. He was married twice, the second wife having been Margaret Eva Angstadt. JOHN SPOHN. John Spohn was born in Cumru township, Berks County, on January 19, 1754, a son of John Spohn, an early settler in that township. He was brought up as a farmer, and came to own and carr}' on for SKETCHES. 273 himself at an early age a farni' of 156 acres in Exeter township, some distance to the south of Mt. Never- sink. At the time of his decease, in 1822, he still owned a farm in that vicinity,' exceeding 200 acres. When the Revolution begah, he was a young man. He formed one of the first companies at Reading in April, 1775, and was commissioned as a captain in January, 1776. His company, and also that of Capt. Peter Decker, constituted part of the 5th Pennsylvania Battalion, and partic ipated in the move ments of Washing ton's Army at and about New York. They were taken prisoners at Fort Washington in November, 1776, and held as such until January following. He was married to Maria Beidler, a daughter of Con rad Beidler, a prominent miller of Robeson township, who owned and carried on for a time the large mill at the mouth of the Allegheny Creek. Interest in mili tary matters led his son-in-law, Philip Rush (my grandfather), to become identified with the County Militia also at an early age, so that when Berks County was called to supply her quota in the War of 1812-15, he became the fife-major of the ist Regiment, 2nd Brigade, under the command of Maj.-Gen'l Daniel Udree. He lived a retired life for some years, and died April 19, 1822. His remains were first interred in the Trinity Lutheran Cemetery, at Sixth and Walnut streets ; then transferred to the Neversink Cemetery. He left a widow ; three sons, Adam, Solomon and 274 REVOLUTION. John ; and four daughters, Catharine (married to John Ingham), Elizabeth (married to Jacob Kerlin), Barbara (married to Philip Rush), and Sarah (married to Daniel Ermold). When I was a boy, possibly 14 years old, I asked grandfather one day about the early times in a general way, but he stopped all further inquiry abruptly by answering that I was too young to be concerned about such matters. 1 cannot recall the subject I was then interested in, but the natural bent of my mind dis played itself. Some years after his death in 1871, I began my inquiries in earnest, and I have kept them up unaided ever since. BENJAMIN SPYKER. Benjamin Spyker was bom in the Palatinate about the year 1723. His father, John Peter Spyker, emi grated to Pennsylvania in 1738, landing at Philadel phia and proceeding thence shortly afterward to Tul pehocken township, where he took up a large tract of land and effected a permanent residence. In 1744, he was licensed to carry on the business of an Indian trader ; and subsequently, he enlisted in the French and Indian War, his business having been destroyed by the rupture between the settiers and the Indians. SKETCHES. 275 During this trying period, he wrote a number of im portant letters in reference to the cruelties of the In dians and the suff"erings of the people. He was a neighbor and intimate associate of Conrad Weiser, and was a saddler by occupation. At the beginning of the Revolution, he assisted in organizing the Associators of the county and preparing them for active military service. In 1776, he repre sented the county in the Provincial Conference and also in the Constitutional Convention. He officiated as a justice of the peace for many years in Tulpe hocken township, his district comprising the western section of the county ; and there he commanded a strong social and political inffuence. He died in Sep tember, 1802, aged nearly 80 years. He was a brother of Peter Spyker, Judge of the County Courts. PETER SPYKER. Peter Spyker was a son of John Peter Spyker. He was born in the Palatinate, and emigrated with his father in 1738, locating in Tulpehocken township shortly after landing at Philadelphia. He carried on farming in that township for many years. 276 REVOLUTION. He was appointed one of the Judges of the county in 1763, and he continued to officiate by reappoint ment until his death in 1789, a period of twenty -six years. He was specially appointed as President of the Courts in 1780, though he had officiated as such since 1767. He was the principal judicial officer of the county during the Revolution. He also served as a justice of the peace of the Tulpehocken district from 1777. He died in August, 1789, in the township named, and left to survive him a widow and five chil dren : John, Peter, Benjamin, Henry and Elizabeth (who was married to Philip Gardner), with a consid erable estate for distribution among them under a last will. HENRY SPYKER. Henry Spyker was a son of Peter Spyker, Judge of the County Courts. He officiated as Pa}'master of the Militia of the county from August, 1777, to the close of the Revolution. In the Militia Returns of 1777, his name appears as the Colonel of the 6th Bat talion, which was composed of companies in the west ern section of the county, and he continued at the head of the militia for that section until 1783. In SKETCHES. 277 the Fall of 1777, he commanded the 5th and 6th classes, numbering 400 men, in the campaign about Chestnut Hill and Germantown. He represented the County in the General Assembly for the years 1785 and 1786. His residence was in Tulpehocken township, where he carried on a general store until 1800, when he re moved to Lewistown, Northumberland County. DANIEL UDREE. Daniel Udree was born at Philadelphia on August 5, 1 75 1. I was not able to obtain any information about his antecedents ; but from the character he dis played in Berks County for a period exceeding fifty years, and the property he acquired and successfully managed, they were evidently of some culture and dis tinction. The Oldenberg and Odenheimer families were among his prominent relatives. His uncle, Jacob Winey, a man of large capital, at Philadelphia, became interested in the iron industries of Berks County, particularly in Oley and Richmond townships, about the year 1768, and he acted as clerk under him. While serving in this capacity, he resided on the Moselem Forge property in Richmond town ship, along the Ontelaunee Creek. In 1778, when only 27 years of age, he was a part owner of the Oley Furnace. Subsequently, he became the sole owner of this prominent industry, and also of the Rockland Forges, with a landed estate altogether embracing 2700 acres in one connected tract. 278 REVOLUTION. While still comparatively young, he exerted a large influence in the upper section of the county ; and when the Revolution began, his patriotism asserted itself in no uncertain manner. In 1777, he was chosen Colonel of the 2nd Battalion of County Militia, and in the Summer of that year his regiment accom panied the ist Battalion, commanded by Col. Daniel Hunter, of Oley, to Chester and participated in the Battle of Brandywine, where his horse was shot under him during the engagement. In that year, he was selected as a member of the two committees on forfeited estates, and collecting clothing, etc. He was again elected Colonel of the same battalion in 1778. Subsequently, for many years, he was prominently identified with the militia of the county and State. In the War of 1812-15, he was Major-General of the 6th Division, which included the two battalions that constituted the 2nd Brigade. His military bearing was very attractive, and his horsemanship won for him general admiration. Col. Udree represented Berks County in the General Assembly from 1799 to 1803, and also in 1805 ; and while in this body he advocated in an earnest manner legislation relative to the internal improvements of Pennsylvania. He also represented the county in the National Congress for two terms, from 1813 to 1815, and from 1823 to 1825. While at Washington, during the latter term, Adams was elected President by the members of the House. Shortly before the election, he attended a reception that was given by Mrs. Adams, and during the course of the evening he met the distinguished lady, when she, in a quiet. SKETCHES. 79 pleasant way, alluded to the probable support which her husband might .receive from the Representatives of Pennsylvania. "Yes," said he to her, "we are like the handle of a jug — all on one side," thereby intimating politely that the great majority of them were for General Jackson. In personal appearance, Col. Udree was of medium height, rather stout but compactly built, and his man ner of conversation was quick and nervous. Shortly before his decease, he attended a local celebration of the "Fourth of July " at Pricetown, and, though 76 280 REVOLUTION. years old, showed much animation while riding in a superb manner on a favorite bob-tailed sorrel horse. He died suddenly from a stroke of apoplexy at his home on the Oley Furnace property on July 15, 1828, and left, to survive him an only child, a daughter, Maria, who was married to Jacob Udree Snyder, to whom his large and valuable estate descended. His remains were interred in the cemetery connected with the Oley Churches. HENRY VANDERSLICE. Henry Vanderslice, son of Anthony Vanderslice and Martha Pannebecker, was born March 9, 1726, in Providence township, then Philadelphia, now Mont gomery County, where he was brought up as a miller. About 1760, he removed to Exeter township, in Berks County. In 1774, he was elected sheriff" of Berks County, and held that position for three years. During the Revolutionary War, he bore a prominent part in the military affairs of the county ; and when Congress directed the Declaration of Independence to be read publicly in the several counties of each Prov ince on July 8, 1776, he, as the sheriff", performed this distinguished service at the Court House in Reading. On November 19, 1789, Daniel Brodhead, as Sur veyor-General of Pennsylvania, appointed him a dep uty surveyor. His sureties were Col. Jacob Morgan and Col. Nicholas Lotz. His surveys were numerous and noted for their accuracy. He died at Reading February 10, 1797, and was buried there. SKETCHES. 281 BENJAMIN WEISER. Benjamin Weiser, , the youngest son of Conrad Weiser, was born in Heidelberg township, Berks County, on August 12, 1744. Upon arriving of age, he conducted a general store in that township, and he carried on this business until 1776, when he was selected as a Council for the German Regiment in the Continental Line. His company was organized out of men from the town ships of Heidelberg and Tulpehocken in the western section of the county. It is not known how long they were in service. They participated in the battles of Trenton and Princeton. During the latter part of 1777, his family, it is believed, removed to Penn township, then in Nor thumberland County, (now Snyder,) locating in the vicinity of Selinsgrove. On January 21, 1778, he was commissioned as a justice of the peace for the township named, by which it would appear that he had changed his residence. Among the Representatives from Berks County in the General Assembly for the year 1782, there was one named Benjamin Weiser. This was doubtless another man, for, on the records in the Recorder's Office, one by this name, described as a tinsmith by occupation, lived at Womelsdorf after 1800, and it is probable that he served this position. Notwithstand ing this evidence, however, it is possible that Captain 282 REVOLUTION. Weiser might have returned to this county and been elected. I could not obtain any facts about him after 1778. CHRISTOPHER WITMAN. Christopher Witman was a cord wain er (shoemaker) at Reading in 1756, and continued in this employ- nient until after 1762. In 1774, he was an innkeeper, his public house having been situated on the south west corner of Penn Square and Fourth street. In December, 1774, he was selected as one of the Com mittee on Observation, and he officiated as the county treasurer from 1775 to 1778. He died while holding this position in May, 1778, and left six sons : John, William, George, Abra ham, Jacob, Daniel ; and a daughter, Catharine. RETROSPECT. 283 RETROSPECT. The foregoing sketches include the names of the most prominent men of Berks County who partici pated actively in the Revolution. Other men, whose names are mentioned in connection with military and representative positions, committees, &c., are equally deserving of a place in this book, but I found my re searches for facts too tedious to extend them without detriment to my regular avocation. I may add that there are still others who have not been mentioned at all. They resided in diflferent parts of the county and contributed their share to the Revolution in various ways, but their names were not given any public prominence during the course of prosecuting the war. Notwithstanding this, they too should be recognized. If sketches of all these men were prepared, it can be readily seen that they would fill a volume of this size. But I did not hope to be able to present so extended a collection, and I trust the reader will consider the numerous disadvantages under which I labored before criticising any imperfections or omissions in this pub lication. By the sketches given, it is apparent that Berks County was represented by a class of men who were truly distinguished for their substantial character, and that they, together with similar men elsewhere throughout the Colonies, constituted the foundation of the political movement of the people for free gov- 284 REVOLUTION. ernment. My researches in discovering such men af forded me much pleasure, and I take great pride in recording their names in this permanent form for the admiration of their numerous descendants. In looking back to the time of the Revolution, and appreciating as well the common desire of the people for their welfare, as the sacrifices which they made in that behalf ; and then following the course of human affairs until now, more especially since 1850, as influenced — indeed, I may add, if not controlled — by mechani cal progress, we cannot fail to observe that we have been gradually drifting away from the liberal prin ciples which were so boldly announced by the Dele gates of 1776, in the Declaration of Independence, and so successfully established in the Constitution of 1787. Equality, fraternity and individuality stood out before our Revolutionary ancestors with prominent, compre hensive and thoroughly appreciated significance ; but it would now seem that success in commerce and manufactures, and in the various enterprises which are largely influenced by steam and electricity, is the principal consideration of financiers, traders, manu facturers, speculators and politicians, howsoever ac complished and with whatsoever sacrifice of local and individual rights. This common display of character, mostly to gratify selfish purposes, may incline a large proportion of the people to look to the future with distrust and fear. It may apparently weaken the fraternal spirit of popu lous communities, and cause harmful tendencies to be exhibited in different channels with increasing force RETROSPECT. 285 until civil strife ensues. But we need not feel un necessarily alarmed. By the experience of mankind during the past four hundred years, these public inut- terings are the certain manifestations of a wonderful and uncontrollable power in the interest of the peace, comfort and contentment of the people. The natural elements startle us at times, but when the lightnings, storms and floods subside, the air is pure and the sky is clear. It seems that these forces must visit the earth, even if attended with suffering, loss and death ; and so it seems that the spirit of social and political agitation must visit a progressive people in the course of their development, even if attended with cruel and destructive warfare. Dictators, rulers and priests, whether in business, politics or religion, may flourish for a time in their vain conceits, and spread extravagant notions in the several affairs of life, and thereby they may obstruct the course of social elevation for a time, just as rocks and cascades impede the flowing waters of winding streams ; but they shall pass away like a cloud in the infinite sky, and their influence shall be absorbed by the multitude just as rivulets from the mountains are at last swallowed by the sea. By speculation and imaginary values, some men may be enabled to reach out hundreds, even thousands, of miles, and affect the labors, the morals, the hopes and the fears of the people ; they may build costly temples for various purposes and win temporary ap plause ; they may scatter large gifts here and there with seeming generous hands and awaken great admi- 286 REVOLUTION. ration ; and they may disturb the social equilibrium by forcing an unnatural and unjust distribution of wealth and power. But they cannot alter the course of free government. It was started centuries ago in the con victions of the people through suffering and blood shed ; and nurtured by succeeding generations until now, particularly through increasing liberality for gen eral education, it has become an indisputable, inalien able and imperishable possession. The will of the people is expressed in their constant desire for liberty, justice and equality. These princi ples may again seem weak and presumptuous in the face of concentrating wealth and power. So were they apparently in 1776, but they nevertheless pre vailed against a government that was distinguished for its worldly greatness and success. By the course of progress in human affairs, we need not doubt their ultimate triumph, for they are not weak and changing creations from the conception of man, but eternal vir tues from the power of God. INDEX. ADDRESS of Provincial Con ference 45 For Flying Camp 48 Admiralty, Register of Court of. . . 195 Affairs at Reading, 1777-78 198 Allegiance, Oath of Required 66 Oaths Administered in County 69 Appeal for Support in Warfare 191 Army Supplies from County 174 Army Surgeons from County 144 Articles of Association, Preamble to 41 County Committee Recom mends 41 Assembly, Members of, from County 194 Assessors of County 197 Associated Battalions, County Colonels of. 40, '95 Associators, Address to, for Flying Camp 47 Companies, what to Consist of 40 County Colonels of. 40 County Committee Recom mends Articles of. 41 Preamble to Articles of. 41 Recommendation of Congress as to 39 .attainder. Committee on, of County 196 Auditing Committee of County. . . 197 BALDY, Capt. Jacob, Company of in New Jersey 133 Roll of Company I33 On the Frontier 137 Battalions,Companies and Classes, Militia System 67 Berks County, Districts of in 1776, 38 Population of in 1776. 38 Resolution of Standing Com mittee to Support Civil Au thority 44 Bethlehem, County Troops at 92 Biddle Edward, Chairman of Pub lic Meeting in 1774 23 Delegate to Congress in 1774. . 27 Member of Assembly 194 Sketch of. 209 Bird, Col. Mark, Battalion of at South Amboy in 1776 108 Letter from, to Council of Safety 108 Letter About English Prison ers at Reading 151 Sketch of. 212 Bower, Capt. Jacob, Company of in Continental Line 117 Roll of Company 118 Sketch of. 214 Bright, Michael, Sketch of. 215 British Authority, Suppression of Recommended by Congress. 43 Invasion, not of the County... 126 Brodhead, Col. Daniel, on Com mittee of Correspondence. . . 24 Appointed a Lieutenant 35 Colonel Of Associators 40 On Standing Committee.... 42, 196 Sketch of. 216 Buildings, Pre-Revolutionary at Reading 203 Burd, Edward, at Cambridge 80 At Long Island 98 Sketch of. 218 CABAL, Conway 200 Canada Campaign, Jones's Company in 80 Captains, Names of, from County in Service I73 Of County in Continental Line 118 Cause of the Revolution 19 Chester, Two Battalions of County at "9 INDEX. Christ, Capt. Henry, Company of at Long Island in 1776 86 Roll of Company 86 Services of Company 87 Sketch of 219 Churches at Reading Used as Hospitals 145 Civil Authority, Support of by the County ., 44 Collectors of Excise 196 Colonels, Names of, from County in Service 173 Of Associated Battalions 40, 195 Commissioners of County 197 Of Forage 196 Committee on Correspon dence 24, 29, 195 Auditing of County 197 Local ig6 On Attainder and Forfeited Estates 196 On Observation 28, 195 Standing 42, 196 To Collect Arms, &c 196 Company Roll of— Capt. Jacob Baldy 133 Capt. Jacob Bower 118 Capt. Henry Christ 86 Capt. Peter Decker 84 Capt. Daniel DeTurck 94 Capt. John Diehl 115 Capt. Michael Furrer 107 Capt. Conrad Geist 156, 165 Capt. Charles Gobin 130 Capt. Jonathan Jones 81 Capt. Charles Krause 164 Capt. John Lesher 105 Capt. John Ludwig 133 Capt. George Miller 106 Capt. Jacob Moser 116 Capt. George Nagel 77 Capt. Peter Nagel 167 Capt . Ferdinand Ritter 131 Capt. John Robinson 139 Capt. Nicholas Scheffer 115 Capt. Conrad Sherman 132 Capt, John Spohn 83 Capt. Henry Strouch 134 Capt. Bartholomew Von Heer, 128 Capt. Benjamin Weiser 102 Capt. George Will 114 Capt. Michael Wolf. 105 Companies of Associators, what to Consist of 40 From County at New York. . . 82 At Newtown 113 In Revolution 75 Militia System 67 Of Ely's Battalion on Frontier, 136 Conference, Provincial, June, 1774, 44 Address for Convention 45 For Flying Camp 47 Declaration of Independence.. 46 Deputies from County to 45, 194 Resolutions of, in 1775 31 Congress, Declaration of Inde pendence by 49 Delegate to, from County 27 Deputies to, at Philadelphia, 1774 27 Letter to, from Standing Com mittee 90 Recommendation of, for Asso ciators 40 Representatives to, in 1776 49 Resolution by, to Suppress British Authority 43 Conscientious Scruples Against War 53 Resolutions Adopted at Pub lic Meeting 33 Constitutional Convention ot Province in 1 776 50 Delegates from County to. . .50, 194 Preamble to Constitution 51 Declaration of Rights 53 Continental Congress, Delegate to 194 Continental Line, County Men in, 116 Captains from County in nS Sundry Enlistments in ..., iiS Continental Paper Money 187 Conway-Cabal 200 Correspondence, Committee of. .29, 195 Councillors, from County 195 Counties of Province in 1775 S9 County Assessors 197 Auditing Committee of 107 Battalions of, at Chester 119 Captains, Names of in Ser\ ice, 173 Commissioners 197 Committee Recommends .Arti cles of Association 41 INDEX. 289 County — f Continued.) Colonels of Associators 40, 195 Committee of Correspon dence 24, 29 Committee of Observation 28 Delegates to Constitutional Convention 51, 194 Delegates to Provincial Con ference 29, 45, 194 Districts of, in 1776 38 English People, Location of in, 35 Enlistments from 141 Forges in 183 Furnaces in 183 Incumbents of Positions- National 194 State 194 County 195 Industries of. 183, 184 Ironmasters of. 184 Jail Building 204 Judges of. 197 Lieutenants of. 196 Members of Assembly of. 194 Militia, Payments for 149 Paymasters of Militia of. 196 Quartermaster of 196 Sub-Lieutenants of. 196 Support of Civil Authority by, 44 Surgeons of Army 144.194 Standing Committee 42, 196 Troops at Bethlehem 92 Sheriffs 197 Treasurers 197 Troops at Newtown, 1781 138 On Frontier, 1782 141 Orders for 146, 147, 148 At South Amboy 103 Court House Building 204 Cut of. 22 Crumrine, Capt. Stephen, Pay to, for Poor Associators 146 DAYS of Drill, Militia System, 68 Decker, Capt. Peter, Com pany of at New York in 1776 84 Roll of Company 84 Services of Company 84 One of First Officers Selected from County 34 Sketch of. 220 Declaration of Independence by Congress 49 Read in Berks County 50 Ey Province 46 Of Rights by Constitutional Convention 53 Delegate Continental Congress, 27, 194 Provincial Conference 29, 194 Constitutional Convention.. .45, 194 DeTurck, Capt. Daniel, Company of at Bethlehem 93 Marching Order to 94 Roll of Company 94 Pay of Men 95 Order to Organize 96 Deputies, Congress of. 27 Diehl, Capt. John, Company of at Newtown 115 Roll of Company 115 Districts of the County in 1776 38 Douglass, Capt. George, at Long Island 90 Sketch of. 220 Drill, Days of, in Militia System, . 68 Duel at Reading 202 Dundas, Thomas, on Committee of Correspondence 24, 195 Sketch of. 221 ECKERT, Capt. Conrad, at White Marsh 122 Sketch of. 224 Eckert, Valentine. Lieutenant of County 196 Sub-Lieutenant of County. . . . 196 Sketch of. 223 Ege, George, Shot and Shell from to Government 177 Sketch of. 225 Ely, Col. Samuel, Battalion of on Frontier Service in 1780 136 Battalion of, at Newtown, 1781, 138 English People, Location of, in County 35 English Prisoners at Reading 151 Conduct of. 152 Geist's Company as Guard 156 Enlistments from County 141 290 INDEX. Estimate of Men in Service 68, 168 Executive Councillors of County. . 195 Excise, Collectors of. 196 Exempted Persons from Service in Militia 69 FARMERS' Inn at Reading 203 Farmers of Berks County, Letter to as to Wool 30 Federal Inn at Reading 204 Cut of. 244 Fines of Militia System 69 Firat Officers Selected from County 34 George Nagel, Major 34 John Spohn," Captain 34 Peter Scull, " 34 Peter Decker, " 34 Daniel Brodhead, Lieutenant, 35 Flying Camp, Address of Confer ence for 47 Intentions of Congress Ex plained 91 Lotz's Battalion in 89 Forage, Commissioners of. ig6 Forfeited Estates, Committee on. . 196 Forges of County 183 Friends' Meeting House 204 Frontiers, Battalion of Col. Mich ael Lindemuth on 128 Ely's Battalion on 136 County Troops on in 1782 141 Furnaces of County 183 Furrer, Capt. Michael, Company of in Patton's Battalion 107 Roll of Company 107 GEEHR, Col. Balser, Battalion of at Bethlehem 93 Colonel of Associated Bat talions 40 Judge of County Courts 197 Member of Assembly 194 On Observation Committee.. 28, 195 On Standing Committee 42, 196 Sketch of 227 Geist, Capt. Conrad, Company of Guarding English Prisoners, 156 Roll of Company 156, 165 Germantown, Reading Officer Wounded at 123 German Regiment, Weiser's Com pany in IOI Other Men from County in 103 German Prisoners at Reading 163 Germans to the Rescue 35 Graydon Alexander, Extracts from Memoirs 198 Sketch of. 230 Gobin, Capt. Charles, Company of in New Jersey 130 Roll of Company 130 HALLER, Col. Henry, Ap pointed to Solicit Subscrip tions to Loan 189 Battalion near Trenton 109 Desertion of Battalion no Conduct Explained no Wagonmaster of County 196 Sketch of. 230 Hessian Prisoners at Reading 157 Camp for 158 Camp Surprised 159 Letter for Removal of. 157 Officer Drowned 162 Sickness and Burial 163 Hiester, Gabriel, Sketch of. 232 Hiester, Joseph, Battalion of with Reed's Army in New Jersey, 129 Company of at Long Island 90 Incidents of Company 99 Sketch of. 233 Hospitals at Reading 145 Hunter, Col. Daniel, Battalion of in New Jersey in Jan'y, 1777, in At Chester, August, 1777 120 Col Brodhead's Letter in Member of Council of Safety.. 51 Putnam's Letter to Council.. . 112 Resolutions of Council 112 Sketch of 235 T NCUMBENTS of Positions -L from County 194 National 194 State 194 County 195 INDEX. 291 Independence and Peace 205 Independence of the Province. ... 43 Declaration of by Province 46 By Congress 49 Indians, Inhabitants of County Killed by 136 Industries of County ¦¦183, 184 Inhabitants of County Killed by Indians 136 Ironmasters of County 184 JAIL Building of County 204 Cutof 155 Jones, Capt. Jonathan, Company of in Canada Campaign 80 Roll of Company 81 Services of Company 81 Jones Thomas, Sketch of, 236 Judges of County. 197 Justices ofthe Peace of County 197 KRAUSE, Capt, Charles, Company of Guarding Pris oners at Reading 164 Roll of Company 164 Kutztown, Troops Encamped at. . 125 Patton's Battalion Marched by Way of. 104 LADICH, Capt. Jacob, Com pany of at Newtown 149 Pay and Bounty of Company. . 149 Lancaster Committee, Letters to from County Committee 29, 30 Lesher, Capt. John, Company of in Patton's Battalion 105 Roll of Company 105 Letter to Council from, about SuppUes Taken 181 Sketch of, 237 Letter as to Wool from Committee of Correspondence 30 To James Read from Gen'l Thomas Mifflin 113 To Congress from Standing Committee 90 To Council from Mark Bird, 151, 176 From Gen'l Israel Putnam about County Troops 112 From James Read 153 From Jacob Morgan, Jr 179 From John Lesher 181 Levan,Daniel,Sheriff of County. . 197 Treasurer of County 197 Sketch of 238 Levan, Sebastian, Sketch of. 238 Lexington, Battle at Awakens County 32 Lieutenants of County 196 Lincoln, Abraham, County Com missioner. ^ 197 Member of Assembly 194 Sketch of. 239 Lindemuth Col. Michael, Bat talion of on Frontiers in 1778, 128 Letter from on Murder of In habitants in 1780 136 One Class of Battalion on Frontiers in 1781 138 On Frontier Service 137, 138 Livingood, Capt. Jacob, Company of in Service in 1781 140 Order for Enlistment 140 Pay of Service 140 Sketch of. 241 Local Committees 196 Long Island, Battle of 97 Lotz, Col. Nicholas, Battalion in Flying Camp 89 Notice to Elect Officers of Bat talion 89 Committee Letter to Con gress 90 Receipt Book of. 183 Chairman of Standing Com mittee ig6 Commissioner of Forage 196 Sketch of. 242 Lower, Christian, County Com missioner ig6 Sub-Lieutenant of County 196 Sketch of. 245 Ludwig, Capt. John, Company in New Jersey 133 Roll of Company 133 Justice of Peace 197 Sketch of. 246 292 INDEX. MANUFACTURED Supplies for Army from County i75 Masts for Navy cut in County. .137, 182 Members ' of Assembly from County 194 Men, Estimate of in Service 168 Men Subject to Military Duty 40, 59 Men Supplied from County, Re ports of. 145 Mifflin, Gen'l Thomas, Letter about Raising Men at Read ing 113 Militia System 56 Couniy Delegates to Lancaster Convention 58 County Returns for 1775 57 " 1776 58 " 1777 59 " " 1778 70 " " 1780 72 " 1783 73 New System Provided in 1777, 66 Battalions, Companies and Classes 67 County Districts Estab lished 67 Days of Drill 68 Fines 69 Oaths Administered in County 69 Oath of Allegiance 66 Pay and Rations 68 Pensions 69 Persons Exempted 69 Guard for Prisoners 166 Payments for, in County 149 Paymasters of County 196 Resolution of Council for 167 Miller, Capt, George, Company of in Patton's Battalion 106 Roll of Company 106 . Money, Continental Paper 187 Morgan, Col. Jacob, Delegate to Constitutional Convention. . 51 Delegate to Provincial Con ference 45 Judge of County Courts 197 Justice ofthe Peace 197 Lieutenant of County 196 Sketch of. 247 Morgan, Col. Jacob, Jr., Deputy Quartermaster-General 194 Superintendent of Commis sioners of Purchases 195 Quartermaster of County 196 Wagonmaster -General of State 195 Sketch of 250 Morgan, David, Sketch of. 253 Moser, Capt. Jacob, Company of in Continental Line 116 Roll of Company 116 Murder of Inhabitants by Indians, 136 Musket Barrels, Length of. 40 NAGEL, Capt. George, Com pany of at Cambridge in 1775 75 Form ot Enlistment 76 Roll of Company 77 Services of Company 79 One of First Officers Selected from County. 34 Sketch of. 254 Nagel, Capt. Peter, Company of Guarding Prisoners at Read ing ¦ 167 Chairman of Meeting of Revo lutionary Survivors 207 Roll of Company 167 Sketch of. 255 Names of Captains and Colonels from County in Sen.ice 173 National Incumbents of Positions from County 194 Negman John and Children Mur dered by Indians in 1780 136 Newtown, Companies from County at 113 Mifflin's Letter for, to Read, 113 County Troops at in 1781 113 New York, Companies at from County in 1776 82 OATH of Allegiance Required in 1777 66 Administered in County 69 Observation, County Committee of, 28, 195 Old, Capt. John, Company of in Lotz's Battalion 90 At Bethlehem 93 Oley, Supplies Taken from in 1778, 181 Otto, Dr. John A., Sketch of 261 INDEX. 293 Otto, Dr. Bodo, Delegate to Pro vincial Conference 45 National Surgeon 194 Surgeon of Army 144 Sketch of. 258 PATTON, Col. John, Battalion of at Bethlehem 93 At South Amboy 103 Appointed to Sign Currency. . 189 Judge of County Courts 197 Member of Assembly 194 Pay to for Cannon Shot 178 Sketch of. 262 Paper Money, Continental 187 Patriotic Spirit of the County 23 Pay and Rations of Militia 68 Payments for County Militia 149 Paymasters of County Militia 196 Pay of Men in Service 76, 95, 186 Pennybacker, Capt. Dirck, Pay to i4g Pennsylvania, Counties of in 1775. 3g Men from, in service in 1776. . 145 In 1777 147 Population of in 1776 38 Peace, Independence and 205 Pensions of Militia System 69 Persons Exempted from Service in Militia 69 Philadelphia, Public Papers Re moved from, to Reading. . . . 198 Population of County in 1776 38 Pennsylvania in 1776 38 Potts, Dr. Jonathan, Army Sur geon from County 144 Delegate to Provincial Con vention 29 Letters to Lancaster Commit tee 29 Letter to Farmers as to Wool, 30 National Surgeon 194 On Committee of Observation, 28 Sketch of. 263 Prayer, First Recommendation for 190 Pre-Revolutionary Buildings at Reading 203 Prices During Revolution 185, 186 Prisoners of War at Reading 151 English 151 Hessian 157 German 163 Militia Guarding.. 156, 164, 165, 167 Proclamation for Favor of God . , . xgo Prominent Industries of County... 183 Furnaces 183 Forges , 183 Prothonotary of Supreme Court. . 195 Province, Counties of in 1775 39 Independence of. 43 Provincial Conference at Philadel phia, July, 1774 26 Notice issued for 26 Conference, June, 1776 44 Address for Flying Camp by 47 Address Issued by 45 Declaration of Independence 46 Deputies from County to. .45, 194 Resolutions of in 1775 31 Provincial Convention, Notice for on January 23, 1775 28 County Delegates to 29 Resolutions of. 31 Provost Guard, Dragoons of County in, 127 Public Meeting at Reading, 1774. . . 23 Public Papers Removed from Philadelphia to Reading 198 Purchases, Superintendent of Commissioners of, 195 Superintendent of. ig6 Putnam, Gen'l Israel, Letter of about Berks County Troops, 112 QUAKER Prisoners at Read ing 154 Quartermaster of County 196 Quartermaster-General, Deputy, from County 194 RATIONS of Militia 68 . Read, Collinson, Secretary of Standing Committee, 42, 44, 196 Sketch of 264 Read, James, Appointed to Sign Continental Notes 189 Committee on Correspon dence 24, 195 Executive Councillor 195 Tustice of the Peace 197 294 INDEX. James Read— (Continued.) Letter from About English Prisoners 153 Member of Assembly 194 Register of Court of Admi ralty 195 Sketch of. 265 Reading, Affairs at 198 Centre of Trade 25 Churches at, used as Hopitals, 145 Duel at 202 Federal Inn at 204 First Companies at 33 Hospitals at 145 Militia to Guard Stores at 148 Patriotic Feeling at in 1775 33 Pre-Revolutionary Buildings . . 203 Prisoners of War at 151 Public Meeting at in 1774 23 Committee Appointed by 24 Resolutions Adopted by 23 Public Papers removed to, from Philadelphia 198 Social Condition in 1777 igS Storekeeper at ig6 Receipt Book of Col. Nicholas Lotz 183 Reeser, William, Chairman of Meeting 33 On Committee of Observa tion 28, igg Sketch of 266 Reformed Church Building 204 Cut of. 144 Register of Court of Admiralty... 195 Reports of Men Supplied from County 145 Return of the Soldiers 206 Revolution, Cause of. 19 Revolutionary Survivors 207, 208 Riehm, Capt. George, Company of at Newtown 138, 149 Pay of Company for Services.. 149 Ritter, Capt, Ferdinand, Company of in New Jersey 131 Roll of Company 131 Robinson, Capt. John, Company of at Newtown in 1781 139 On Frontiers in 1782 141 Roll of Company 139 SCHEFFER, Capt. Nicholas, Company of at Newtown 115 Roll of Company 115 Schultz, Christopher, Justice of the Peace 197 On Committee of Correspon dence 24 On Committee of Observation, 28 Sketch of. 267 Scull, Edward, Secretary of Board of War 194 Ordered on Recruiting Ser vice, 177S 147 Sketch of. 268 Scull, Peter, one of First Officers Selected from County 34 Sketch of. ; 268 Secretary of Board of War from County 194 Service, Estimate of Men in from County 168 Sherman, Capt. Conrad, Com pany of in New Jersey 132 Roll of Company 132 Sheriffs of County 197 Shoemaker, Charles, Delegate to Constitutional Convention, 51 Delegate to Provincial Con ference 4s ¦ Justice of the Peace 197 Sketch of 269 Shoemaker, Jacob, on Committee of Observation 28, 195 Sketch of. 271 Shot and SheU from George Ege to the Government 177 Snell, Dr. Nicholas, Surgeon at Newtown 149 South Amboy, County Troops at in 1776 103 Social Condition at Reading in 1777 and 1778 19S Soder, Capt. John, Sketch of. 271 Soldiers, Return of the 206 Spohn, Capt. John, Company of at New York in 1776 S3 Roll of Company S3 Services of Company S4 One of First Officers Selected from County 34 Sketch of. 272 INDEX. 295 Spyker, Benjamin, Delegate to Constitutional C o n v e n - tion 51, 194 Delegate to Provincial Con ference 45, 194 Sketch of . . . 274 Spyker, Col. Henry, Battalion of at White Marsh 122 Orders to for Pay of Militia. .. 150 Paymaster of County Militia, ig6. Sketch of. 276 Spyker, Peter, Judge of County Courts ig7 Justice of the Peace 197 Sketch of 275 Standing Committee 42,44, 91, 196 Letter of to Congress : 90 State Incumbents of positions from County 194 Strouch, Capt. Henry, Company of in New Jersey 134 Roll of Company 134 Storekeeper at Reading 196 Sub-Lieutenants of County ig6 Supplies for Army from County. . 174 Manufactured 175 Collected 177 At Reading 180 Suppression of British Authority Recommended by Congress, 43 Surgeon of Army from County. , , . 144 National from County ig4 Supreme Court, Prothonotary of. . 195 Survivors of Revolution 207, 208 TORIES, who Designated 21,37 Trinity Lutheran Church Building 204 School Building 204 Tulpehocken, Companies from at Bethlehem 93 UDREE, Daniel, Colonel of Militia 61, 70 Commanded Battalion at Chester 120 Sub-Lieutenant of County 196 Sketch of. 277 VON HEER, Capt, Bartholo mew, Company of Dragoons in Provost Guard 12S Roll of Company 128 WAR, Conscientious Scru ples against 33 Wagonmaster of County 196 Wagon master-Gen erals of the County 195 Warfare, Appeal for Support in . . . 191 Washington's Army near the County 124 Weiser, Capt. Benjamin, Com pany in German Regiment. , loi Roll of Company 102 Services of Company 102 Sketch of. 2S1 Weiser Store Building 204 Whigs, who Designated 21 White Marsh, Battalion of Col. Henry Spyker at 122 Whitman, Lieut., Wounded at Germantown 123 Will, Capt. George, Company of at Bethlehem 93 At Newtown 114 Roll of Company 114 Wilson, Capt. James, Recom mended for Recruiting Ser vice in 177S 148 Wolf, Capt. Michael, Company of in Patton's Battalion 105 Roll of Company 105 Wool, Committee Letter as to 30 -^^^^^^ ^^^^9^!^ iiii^^itt^^«i^ ¦