C JaUo YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Bought with the income of the DWIGHT HALL FUND A TREATISE ON THE SACRAMENTS OF THE CHURCH. : Quanquam non soleo apud me epistolas meas servare, nee possum, quia, ut primo scribuntur, a me dantur, nullo earum exemplo retento ; tamen, si quse sunt quae aliquid in se doctrine habent, eas omnino perdi nolim." Joannes Coletus Abbati WmcmNcrjMBENsi. lOANNIS COLET OPUS DE SACRAMENTIS EC CLE SIM,. A TREATISE ON THE SACRAMENTS OF THE CHURCH, BY JOHN COLET, D. D. FORMERLY SEAN OF ST. PAUL'S. NOW EIEST PUBLISHED, WITH AN INTEODUCTION, BY J. H. LITPTON, M.A. sur-master of st. paul's school, and late fellow of st. John's college, Cambridge. LONDON: BELL AND DALDY, YORK STREET, OOVENT GARDEN. 1567. PREFACE. 'HORTLY before I sought permission to publish the following Treatise, a permis sion which was most obligingly granted by the Court of the Worshipful Com pany of Mercers, I had found my task considerably lightened. It had been my intention to enter at some length into the circumstances of Dean Colet's life, so far as they served to throw light on the state of religion and learning at that period. For this purpose I had been gradually making collections for a considerable space of time. But, in March last, it was my fortune to discover that all, and much more than all, which I had contemplated, was already most efficiently performed. I allude to a work re cently published, by Frederick Seebohm, Esq., en titled The Oxford Reformers of 1498. Some of the proof-sheets of this were shown to me by the cour tesy of the author; and I could not but rejoice to find that the sketch I had been meditatmg was rendered unnecessary by such a finished portrait. I mention this to account for, and in some measure excuse, what may appear disconnected in the follow ing Introduction. My original plan being altered, I vi PEEFACE. endeavoured to confine myself to such topics as bore directly upon Dean Colet's Treatise; whilst yet being unwilhng to exclude some few particulars which might interest those concerned in St. Paul's School. On one point I was several times in doubt ; namely, whether or not it would be better to accompany the Latin Treatise with a translation. But, whilst doing so would have increased the size of the book, I judged that those into whose hands alone it was likely to come would readily dispense with such an addition. The peculiarities of spelling, usual at the period, such as justicie for justitias, and the like, I have not thought it worth while to reproduce. Some obvious slips of the transcriber I have silently corrected; more important ones are noted at the foot of the page. The blanks in words and sentences which occur here and there in the manuscript, evidently those left by one who could not decipher the writing before him, I have filled up on conjecture; marking all such insertions by [ ]. The quotations from Scripture I have throughout verified, and placed the references in the margin. Besides the more obvious extracts from Dionysius, I have added one or two passages from the Fathers, which are cited, or seem alluded to ; and now and then a brief note in illustra tion of the text. The Introduction and Synopsis will, I trust, render anything more than this unnecessary. St. Paul's School, May, 1867. INTRODUCTION. )HE Treatise which is here presented to the reader occupies the last sixty pages of a manuscript volume, in quarto, which has been in the library of St. Paul's School since the year 1759. The inscription on the fly-leaf shows that it was the gift of Robert Emmott; but its previous history I have not been able to trace. From a passage in Pepys's Diary1 it would appear that there were some of Colet's treatises in the possession of the High Master of that time, Mr. Samuel Crumleholme; but in a little work, written shortly afterwards, the titles of these are given,2 and prove them not to have been included in 1 Under Feb. 7th, 1660. " Went to Paul's School; where he that made the speech for the Seventh Form, in praise of the Founder, did shew a book which Mr. Crumlum had lately got, which he believed to be of the Founder's own writing." 2 " His Commentary on the Epistle to the Romanes, and an Epistle of his to a Cardinal, both writ with his own hand, are in the Library of St. Paul's School in London." — A Sermon of Conforming and Reforming, Src, edited by Tho. Smith (1661), p. 75. In the Great Fire of 1666, as Strype tells us (Stow, i. 168), Cromleholme " lost an 2 INTEODUCTION. the contents of the present volume. The previous part of the volume consists of two treatises, one on the Celestial Hierarchy, and the other on the Eccle siastical Hierarchy of Dionysius, the so-called Areo- pagite. These two are digests, or summaries, of the corresponding works of Dionysius, made, as the opening sentences 1 of the first inform us, for the use of a friend. All three are in the same neat and beautiful hand. That this is not Dean Colet's own is clear from several considerations. The manuscript has all the appearance of a fair copy ; here and there are blanks in the middle of a sentence, which betoken an amanuensis, unable to decipher a word or phrase; and, what is most conclusive of all, a portion of it is evidently a transcript of a copy corrected by the author. This appears from a comparison of the manuscript2 in the Cambridge University Library, which contains several compositions of Dean Colet's, and among them one on the Celestial Hierarchy. In the margin of this are marked numerous corrections and additions, in a less formal hand, very probably the author's ; and those corrections are embodied in incomparable library ; for he was very curious in books." Such as were rescued from the fire probably got scattered about ; and possibly the two Treatises described by Smith are the very ones now in the University Library at Cambridge. 1 " Cognosco tuam sublimem et angelicam mentem, vir optime et amice charissime, dignam sane quas non solum de angelis audiat, sed prseterea quas cum ipsis una consocietur. Quapropter, quas heri et nudiustertius apud Dionysium Areopagitam in eo suo libro qui inscri- bitur Be Ccelesti Hierarchia (in quo magnifice et divinitus de angelis disserit) legi et memoria reportavi, ea volo tecum communicare." 2 Which, by the courteous permission of the authorities, I was allowed to inspect. It is marked Gg. iv. 26. INTEODUCTION. ^ 3 the school manuscript.1 I am inclined to think that the handwriting of the latter is that of Peter Meghen, a native of Brabant, and Colet's amanuensis.2 It resembles, most nearly of all which I have seen, that of a little volume in the British Museum,3 which purports to contain the original Statutes of St. Paul's School, and the history of which is so curious as to deserve a passing notice. It is entitled: — Statuta Paulince Scholce. — Hunc Libellum ego Joannes Colet tradidi in manibus Magistri Lilii xviii0 die Junii a0- X'~ m.ccccc xviii. ut eum in scola servet et observet. And inside the cover is written the following memo randum, signed " William Hamper, Deritend House, Birmingham, Feb. 5th, 1820." " This valuable do cument was given to me by Mr. Rodd, Bookseller, Great Newport Street, Long Acre, in whose shop I accidentally discovered it, lying, as waste paper, be tween the last leaf and cover of a fragment of an old 1 Thus, for example, in the sentence at the bottom of the first page, " in qua unitate lucis omnino et idemtitate est varietas rerum ; in variis rebus eadem lux," the latter part is altered to " luxque eadem manet una et simplex in variis rebus ; " and so it appears in the School copy. 2 A noble manuscript of his, executed at Dean Colet's charge, is also in the University Library, marked Dd. vii. 3. It is a transcript of the Gospels of St. Matthew and St. Mark, in Latin, arranged in parallel columns ; but being in a print hand, does not afford the means of comparison with the School manuscript. The same remark holds good, I am informed, with respect to the manuscripts done by Meghen, which are in the Library of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. Knight, in the Introduction to his Life of Colet (1823), p. xvi, speaks of a " manuscript in the Chapter-house at St. Paul's, writ by Dean Colet's own hand." Through the kindness of the Rev. W. S, Simpson, M.A., Librarian of St. Paul's, I am enabled to state that no such manuscript is to be found there. 8 " Additional and Egerton, S. 6274." It is a thin quarto of twelve leaves, neatly repaired and bound. 4 INTEODUCTION. law manuscript on vellum, which, with others of a like description, was on the point of being sent to a neighbouring gold-beater's, to be used for the pur poses of his trade.— July 7th, 1818." l The sub scription at the end of this document — Joannes Colett, fundator nove scole manu mea propria — seems to indi cate that it is in Colet's own handwriting ; and there is undoubtedly a resemblance between it and that of the school manuscript : but I think the reasons given above, on the other side, to be much more weighty. To pass from the question of the handwriting to that of the time when the Treatise on the Sacraments was composed, there is reason for thinking that it was not long after 1498. Besides the slight presumption which its being found in the same copy affords, that it was a work of the same period as the summaries of Dionysius before-mentioned, there is the more important fact, that it is deeply penetrated with the influence of that writer. Now, Erasmus, writing about the year 1530,2 states that Grocyn, " thirty years before," had begun to lecture in St. Paul's on 1 A copy of it, in facsimile, is in vol. xv. of Kennett's MSS. (Lans- downe Library, No. 949), with this note : — " Ex autographo tran- scripsit Joannes Copping, Maii, &c. 1715." Is it possible that tho original lay misplaced in some law-stationer's office, till found, more than a century later, by Mr. Hamper ? 2 The passage occurs in the Declarationes Des. Erasmi Roterodami ad censuras Lutetios vulgatas sub nomine Facultatis Theologies Paris- iensis, printed by Froben in 1532, p. 264. The charge in question was, that Erasmus, in the Epistola ad D. Erardum de Marca, pre fixed 'to his paraphrase of the First Epistle to the Corinthians, had used the following language : — " Nam Dionysius, qui in Hierarchia Secunda priscos Ecclesia? ritus satis copiose describit, eruditis recentior quispiam fuisse videtur, quam fuerit Areopagites ille Pauli discipulus." (Froben, 1534, tomus secundus, p. 146). Erasmus replies by noticing men's INTEODUCTION. the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy, but had not been many weeks engaged in his task before he came to the conclusion that the writings which passed for the Areopagite's could not be his. It is not likely that after Grocyn, an intimate friend of Colet's, had made, and publicly owned, this discovery, Colet would have continued to speak of Dionysius with such unqualified respect.1 Moreover, an event occurred in the year 1498 which was likely to direct Colet's thoughts afresh to Dionysius ; whose writings, in some form or other, he had before met with during his travels on the Continent. This was the publication of the Paris edition of some of the works of the Areopagite, in the form of a Latin translation by Ambrosius, the earliest edition, I believe, which had appeared. The attention thus excited is shown, to some extent, by the publication, in 1502, of the Argentine edition, containing, in a Latin dress, the works which had appeared four years before, with some additional ones. There is therefore no improbability in supposing, that it was the appearance of one of these two edi- proneness to such pious frauds as he held the production of the Areo pagite's works to be ; and, to show that other learned men were of his opinion, cites the case of Grocyn. 1 Jewell, indeed, distinctly states that Colet held the same view as Grocyn : — " Dionysius, although he be an ancient writer, as it may many waies well appeare, yet it is judged by Erasmus, John Colet, and others many, grave and learned men, that it cannot be Areopagita, S. Paul's disciple, that is mentioned in the Acts." — Of Private Masse (ed. 1611), p. 8. But Harding, in his Rejoinder to M. Jewel's Replie (1566), fol. 44, sayS : — « As for John Colet, he hath never a word to shew, for he wrote no workes. If he said it at his table, or in a sermon, as M. Jewel perhappes hath heard saye, the proufe is of small auctoritie. We admit not' the trial of hearesaies." 6 INTEODUCTION. tions, most likely of the former, which turned Colet's attention afresh to the Hierarchies, and prompted him to draw up the abridgments of them before referred to. Indeed, if we can depend upon the date given by Erasmus for Grocyn's Lectures on Dionysius, it is not unreasonable to conjecture that he was the friend for whose benefit Colet took this trouble. After reading Colet's abstracts, supposing him not as yet to have thoroughly studied the author for himself, Grocyn would be likely enough " stomachari in eos, qui negarent esse ilium Areopagitam. " And the present Treatise on the Sacraments would seem, from its .style, to have had its origin in the same train of thought. When we think of the eminently practical cast of Dean Colet's mind, it is almost surprising that the high-flown fancies and turgid style of Dionysius should have made any deep impression on him. We call to mind his strong common sense, as it is so admirably portrayed for us in Erasmus's account of their journey to the shrine of St. Thomas of Canter bury;1 and we feel that in the twelve years or so 1 In the colloquy headed Peregrinatio religionis ergo, of which a new translation, with many interesting notes, by John Gough Nichols, Esq., appeared in 1849. The story has since been told by Dean Stanley, in his Historical Memorials of Canterbury (1865), pp. 240 sqq. Mr. Nichols has satisfactorily proved that the Gratianus Pullus of the Dialogue was no other than Colet. Fuller, in his Abel Redivi- vus (1651), p. 99, mentions the circumstance which is shown to have suggested the name of Pullus, and adds a reason for it of his own : — " Black he loved above all colours, preferring it farre before Purple ; which preserved his Doctorall robes the longer." If any one still doubts of the completeness of Mr. Nichols' proof that Gratianus Pullus was John Colet, and no imaginary Oration INTEODUCTION. which elapsed between the probable date of this Treatise and the pilgrimage to Canterbury, great changes must have taken place in his mind. But it should be remembered how wide a sway those singular writings once exercised. " Dionysius is the mystical hero of mysticism. You find traces of him everywhere. Go almost where you will, through the writings of the mediteval mystics, into their depths of nihilism, up their heights of rapture or of speculation, through their overgrowth of fancy, you find his authority cited, his words employed, his opinions more or less fully transmitted."1 The very fact that their authority was disputed, at the first public citation of them of which we find mention, tended to direct men's thoughts to them the more. When the Severians, at the Council of Con- Pullen, I think that I can add" another argument. Gratianus is clearly a Latin translation of the name John. In the interpretation of Hebrew names given us by St. Jerome (a favourite author with both Erasmus and Colet), among those taken from the Acts is the follow ing: — "Joannes, in quo est gratia, vel Domini gratia." Bishop Jewell seems to have had the same thought, in a passage that reminds us, in more than one respect, of Colet. Speaking of the lessons which our Christian names should teach, he says: — " As, if any be called John, that he pray for grace, and desire to be filled with grace : that he give witnesse of Christ, that he is the Lambe of God which taketh away the sins of the world : that he rebuke vice boldly, as John did in Herod, though he were a mighty prince." — Treatise of ilie Sacraments (1611), p. 268. 1 Hours with the Mystics, by Robert Alfred Vaughan, B.A. (1856), vol. i. p. 128. This highly-gifted author was well able to form an opinion on the matter : but I think he is somewhat too severe on the merits of Dionysius as a writer: — " His verbose and turgid style, too, is destitute of all genuine feeling. He piles epithet on epithet, throws superlative on superlative, hyperbole on hyperbole, and it is but log upon log; he puts no fire under, neither does any come from else where."— Ib. p. 127. 8 INTEODUCTION. stantinople, in 533, endeavoured to support their opinions by a reference to the Areopagite, the validity of their standard was called in question, on the ground that neither Cyril nor Athanasius had indi cated any knowledge of it in their own controversies against Nestorius and Arius.1 In course of time, this Dionysius became identified with the patron saint of France,2 and the influence of his works was thus still more widely spread. They were translated and commented on by John Scotus in the ninth cen tury, and appealed to by Boniface VIII. in the thirteenth.3 Should any one now attempt seriously to maintain the genuineness of these writings, as being, what they were long believed to be, the com position of the Dionysius converted by St. Paul at Athens, Casaubon's expression4 would hardly be too strong to apply to him. But at the time when Colet read them, it was but small disparagement to 1 Neander's General History of the Christian Religion (1851), vol. v. p. 235. 2 As such, his portrait stands first in the Pourtraits et vies des Hommes illustres of Andre" Thevet (1584), who thus disposes of the question of genuineness : — " Je ne daignerois respondre a ceux qui trop severes Aristarques revoquent en doubte si cestuy Denis Areopa gite, disciple de Sainct Paul, et Apostre des Gauls, est autheur des livres qui sont divulguez en son nom, les attribuant a autres qui ont vescu en autre temps." — fol. 2. a. See also Struve's Introductio in notitiam rei literarics (1754), p. 607; and Mosheim's Ecclesiastical History (1790), vol. ii. p. 331, where is the story of his works reaching France in 824. 3 Neander, vol. ix. pp. 11-12. 4 Written in his copy of Dionysius : — " Auctor est sane lectu dig- nissimus, et qui Pontificiorum causam aperte in multis jugulat. Hunc autem fuisse Apostolorum tequalem stupor est credere ; furor est velle aliis persuadere. Asinos esse oportet, qui hoc sibi sinent persuaderi." Cave's Historia Literaria (1688), p. 177. INTEODUCTION. 9 his intellect that he should believe them to be the genuine work of the disciple of St. Paul. Erasmus, in a letter1 written in the year that Colet died, speaks of them as the production of a later author. Since then it has been the fashion to depre ciate them.2 Be their value, however, what it may, 1 Epistolas (1642), p. 1825, G., being the letter to Cardinal de Marca, from which an extract has been given, 2 So Neander, iii. p. 497 : — " A theurgical system, or mixed sym bolism of this sort, formed out of a mixture of Christianity and Pla- tonism, we find completely elaborated in the writings forged under the name of Dionysius the Areopagite, which might have been composed some time in the course of the fifth century." Fabrieius, in his Prolegomena to Marinus's Proclus (1703), p. xii, speaks of " that lunatic Dionysius" — " larvatum ilium Dionysium Areopagitam " — and by Brucker he is described as " Pseudo-philosophus ille et impostor." Miscellanea histories Philosophies (1748), p. 142. n. In the clouds of controversial dust which have been raised about the age and authorship of the Dionysiac writings, it is not easy to take a correct view of the value, of the writings themselves. Many will be disposed to respond to the conclusion of Struve (Introductio, Sfc, p. 856) respecting the works of the Mystics generally : — " Omnes judicant, paucissimi intelligunt. Legi, pervolvi horum scripta, nee condemno, nee adprobo : non intelligo." In Usher's Dissertatio, sub joined to his Historia Dogmatiea (1690), pp. 281-289, the reader will find a full discussion of the arguments against the Apostolic date claimed for Dionysius. Usher concludes by assigning him to the fifth century. Pearson, in his Vindicics Epistolarum S. Ignatii (1852), vol. i. pp. 249-264, places him still earlier, and makes him contempo rary with Eusebius. Peter Halloix, in his Qucestiones de Vita et operibus S. Dionysii, appended to the Venice edition of 1756, argues very acutely against some of the reasons commonly brought forwards for the lateness .of the authorship ; especially that grounded on the alleged quotation from Ignatius. The opinion of Grocyn he makes very light of: — " Quam putida ratio ! et quam arundineo innixa baculo auctoritas. Albusne an ater fuerit iste Crocinus qui ista crocitavit, qui3 novit?" In one of the Dissertations appended to the Disquisitio Chronologica of Baraterius (1740), pp. 285 sqq., a sensible view, as I think, is taken. And though the reader may not join in his conclu sion that the author of the Hierarchies was really Dionysius, Bishop 10 INTEODUCTION. their influence on Colet's mind, at one period of his life at least, was such, that it seems proper to give a short account of the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy, as being the treatise which Colet epitomized most fully, and which has given a strong tinge to his own work on the Sacraments. Of the seven chapters into which the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy is divided, the first treats of the resemblance between the Celestial Hierarchy and the Ecclesias tical. The object of each is to raise the beings, of and for whom it consists, through successive stages, from a lower order to a higher, and so, in the end, to God. For this purpose, the orders of heavenly beings receive an illumination directly, as their spiritual natures allow them to do, from the Source of all Light; but for mankind, there is need of sensible images, or sacraments. The second treats of Baptism, the formal com mencement of the spiritual life ; of the ceremonies attending it — the stripping off the old garments, the anointing with oil, the arraying in a white robe, and the participation in the Holy Communion. of Alexandria, he will see good reason for not regarding the work as that of an impostor. It may be added that Pilkington, in his Confutation of an Addition (Parker Society, 1842), p. 586, contrasts the simplicity of rites, as described in Dionysius, with the Popish additions of later times. And Stillingfleet, no mean authority, whilst denying any right to the title of Areopagite, appears to have had no thought of the writings being " forged." " If you had asked," he writes in his controversy with Cressy, " whether he had been an ancient and learned author, living sometime within the first four hundred years, you should not have met with any opposition from me." — Rational Account (1665), p. 648. INTEODUCTION. 11 The third is on the Eucharist, called Synaxis, and Communion, as uniting us to God ; with a descrip tion of the manner of solemnising it. The fourth contains an account of the consecration of the Holy Oil, and the mystical significance of its use in Baptism, at the altar, and the like. The fifth describes the priestly Orders, and their office ; the Christian Hierarchy being something mid way between the Mosaic and the Heavenly. As the channels through which the Christian Church receives illumination are more corporeal than spiritual natures require, so are they less carnal and material than those suited to the infant condition of the Legal Church. The sixth assigns the Orders which are the proper subjects of the threefold work of purifying, illu mining, and perfecting. The Monastic state is the highest example of the last, or perfect condition. Then follow the forms of Monastic consecration. The seventh and last treats of the burial of the dead, whether ecclesiastics or lay people ; the mean ing of anointing after death ; and the nature and limitations of prayers for the dead. We may thus see that the pervading idea in this Treatise of Dionysius is that of a gradual ascent to God, through various stages of spiritual life, brought about through the agency of corresponding orders in a divinely appointed ministry. To quote again the words of Vaughan,1 " The chain of being in the upper and invisible world, through which the Divine power diffuses itself in successive gradations, he calls the Celestial Hierarchy. The Ecclesiastical Hierarchy 1 Ut supra, p. 123. ( 12 INTEODUCTION. is a corresponding series in the visible world. The orders of angelic natures and of priestly functionaries correspond to each other. The highest rank of the former receive illumination immediately from God. The lowest of the heavenly imparts divine light to the highest of the earthly hierarchy. Each order strives perpetually to approximate to that immedi ately above itself, from which it receives the trans mitted influence, so that all, as Dante describes it, draw and are drawn, and tend in common towards the centre, God.'" The idea is, in itself, a sublime one, when divested of unnecessary mysticism ; and the reader will not fail to perceive how largely it enters into the follow ing treatise of Dean Colet's. With respect to the number of the Sacraments, we do not find in Dionysius any formal enumeration of them, much less the exact seven which were after wards recognized by theWestern Church. And this the early date assigned to him would naturally lead us to expect. Of the seven chapters composing the Eccle siastical Hierarchy, setting apart the first as introduc tory, we find that the remaining six treat, in brief, of Baptism, the Lord's Supper, the Consecration of the Holy Oil, Priestly Orders, Monastic Dedication, and the Ceremonies of the Holy Dead. And these are the very six rites to which, as we are informed,1 the term mysterium became gradually restricted in the Eastern Church. But, in fact, till long after the time of Dionysius, both the sacramentum of the 1 Hard wick, History of the Christian ChurcJi: Middle Age, (1853), p. 321, n. INTEODUCTION. 13 Western and the mysterium of the Eastern Church, were terms employed with great latitude of mean ing. It was not till the twelfth century that " the ordinances which could claim to be admitted to the rank of sacraments were found to coincide exactly with the sacred number seven. The earliest trace of this scholastic limitation has been pointed out in a discourse of Otho, the Apostle of the Pomeranians (1124); and from the age of Peter Lombard, Bona- ventura, and Aquinas, members of the Western Church were taught to pay a large, if not an equal, share of reverence unto all the Sacraments of the new law : — Baptism, Confirmation, the Eucharist, Peni tence, Extreme Unction, Orders, and Matrimony."1 In the Necessary Doctrine, put forth in 1543,2 the list of seven Sacraments is retained. The First Book of Homilies (1547) speaks of the " Sacrament of Matri mony." Cranmer's Catechism gives three Sacra ments as instituted by Christ, namely, Baptism, Absolution, and the Lord's Supper. In the Second Book of Homilies (1563) there is a clear decision given on the matter : — " In general acceptation, the name of a Sacrament may be attributed to any thing, whereby an holy thing is signified. In which under standing of the word the ancient writers have given this name, not only to the other five, commonly of late years taken and used for supplying the number of the seven Sacraments, but also to divers and sundry other ceremonies, as to oil, washing of feet, 1 Hardwick, Ib. 2 Quoted in Browne's Exposition of the Thirty-nine Articles (1 858), p. 580 ; whence also I have taken the references to Cranmer and the Homilies. 14 INTEODUCTION. and such like : not meaning thereby to repute them as Sacraments in the same signification that the two forenamed Sacraments are. Dionysius, Bernard, de Ccend Domini, etAblut. pedum" And Bishop Jewell,1 writing some two years later, allows a like freedom in the use of the word : — " Now for the number of Sacraments, how many there be, it may seeme some what hard to say, and that it cannot be spoken with out offence. For men's judgements heerein have swarved very much : some have said there are two ; others three ; others foure ; and others, that there are seven Sacraments. This difference of opinions standeth rather in termes, than in the matter. For a Sacrament, in the maner of speaking which the Church useth, and in the writings of the Holy Scrip ture, and of ancient fathers, sometimes signifieth pro perly every such Sacrament which Christ hath ordained in the New Testament, for which he hath chosen some certaine element, and spoken special words to make it a Sacrament, and hath annexed thereto the promise of grace : sometimes it is used in a general kind of taking ; and so every mistery set downe to teach the people, and many things that in deed and by special property be no Sacraments, may neverthelesse passe under the generall name of a Sacrament." With such divergence between the conclusions of the Eastern and Western Churches as to the Sacra ments, and such a latitude in the use of the term itself, as the above passages show, we shall not be surprised to find little that is dogmatic in Colet's 1 Treatise of the Sacraments (1611), p. 263. INTEODUCTION. 15 treatise. He adopts, indeed, the prevalent enumera tion of seven Sacraments, but he arranges them in an order of his own. In the Distinctions of Peter Lom bard,1 they are treated of in the following order : — Baptism, Confirmation, Eucharist, Penitence, Ex treme Unction, Orders, Matrimony. And this arrangement was finally confirmed by the Council of Trent.2 But Colet, under the influence of the spiri tualizing mysticism of Dionysius, places Orders and Matrimony together first, as distinctive of the "Vir," the masculine or sacerdotal element in the Church ; the remaining five, of which Penitence occupies" the first place, being assigned to the " Uxor," the femi nine or lay element. So far from being at all in the manner of Peter Lombard, his treatise may almost be described as a commentary on the text, "Sacra- mentum hoc magnum est j ego autem dico in Christo 1 This famous writer died July 20th, 1164. Cave specifies six editions of his Sentences between 1474 and 1499 inclusive. His work appears to have been welcomed as a convenient handbook, and the com mentators upon it were very numerous. Erasmus, in his note on St. Matt. i. 19 (quoted by Fabrieius), says: — "Haud aspernandus Theo- logus Petrus Longobardus, rhapsodus ejus operis quod vocant Sen-. tentiarum, quern arbitror quidem et probum fuisse virum, et, ut ilia ferebat setas, eruditum. Atque utinam illius labor tarn feliciter cessis- set Orbi Christiano quam ab illo susceptum est pio studio. Siquidem apparet ilium hoc egisse, ut semel collectis quse ad rem pertinebant, quaestiones omnes excluderet. Sed ea res in diversum exiit. Videmus enim ex eo opere nunquam finiendarum qua^stionum non examina sed maria prorupisse." 2 Sessio septima' (die tertio Martii, 1547) : Canon i. : — " Si quis dixerit, Sacramenta novae legis non fuisse omnia a Jesu Christo Domino nostro instituta, aut esse plura, vel pauciora, quam septem; videlicet: Baptismum, Confirmationem, Eucharistiam, Pcenitentiam, Extremam Unctionem, Ordinem, et Matrimonium; aut etiam aliquod horum septem non esse vere et proprie Sacramentum, anathema sit." 16 INTEODUCTION. et in Ecclesia." Whilst the five last mentioned Sa craments are handled very briefly, the two preceding — Orders and Matrimony — are treated of at great length. On Matrimony especially; that spiritual union, namely, "betwixt Christ and his Church,"1 of which he does not scruple to call the union of man and wife a " vain and empty shadow," he expatiates at length. This, in fact, he makes to include all: " to the fruitful union of mankind, as wife, with God, as husband, all the Sacraments in the Church tend." And he does not hesitate to explain the silence of Dionysius about marriage, on the ground, either of his perceiving it to be identical with priesthood, or of his meaning us to gather that, in the Church of Christ there ought not to be any other marriage than the mystical one involved in the priesthood. If any additional argument were required to prove that this treatise was written at a comparatively early period of Colet's life, it would be furnished by his maintaining such doctrines as these. They ap pear to betoken a study of books, rather than of the world. When, in 1511, he preached his Convocation Sermon,2 he spoke boldly of the evil of " carnal con- 1 The words of the introduction in our service — " signifying unto us the mystical union that is betwixt Christ and His Church" — would have well satisfied Dean Colet; but, so far as this treatise expressed his real thoughts, he would not have called matrimony an " holy estate," and " honourable among all men." 2 Given at length in vol. ii. of The Phcsnix ; or, a Revival of scarce and valuable Pieces (1708). — In his Preface, p. iv, the editor of the Phoenix speaks of it as " perhaps one of the oldest, as well as one of the honestest, extant in the English tongue." " This piece," he adds, " we might safely trust alone into the world without Passport or Recommendation ; whether we consider it purely as a sermon, with INTEODUCTION. 17 cupiscence." But he did not propose, as the remedy for it, the stricter enforcing of celibacy among priests. And when he was called upon to put the soundness of his own views to a very practical test, in the choice of governors and masters for his newly-founded school, he showed no preference for the unmarried state, but rather the reverse. " In charge of the revenues," Erasmus tells us,1 " and of the whole con cern, he set, not priests, not a bishop, not a chapter, not dignitaries; but married citizens,2 of established respect to the language and ornaments of speech, tho preached in the reign of Henry VII, or with respect to the matter and doctrine, tho in the days of Popery." Bishop Burnet " once intended to have published it, as a piece that might serve to open the scene, and to shew the state of things at the first beginnings of the Reformation." (16. p. v.) It was republished by Tho. Smith in 1661 ; and again in 1701 ; the suggestive cause of this latter republication being stated to be a recent quotation from it by Dr. Atterbury. « ¦ From his greatness as a preacher, Erasmus in one passage fanci fully derives the name of Colet: — " Since Coheleih is the Hebrew word for Preacher, which in Greek is Ecclesiastes." — Letter to Thomas Lupset {Epp., 1642, iv. 4). — Smith, who mentions this remark about Coheleih, adds : — " If I might guess again, I should say, that he was so called because of those rare endowments that were in him. For the Colet is that part of the ring wherein the pretious stone or signet is set .... It pleased Aim. God to break his mother's wedding-ring, in taking away all her 22 children, except only one; but he preserved the colet of it, in preserving our Dr. alive as long as she lived." — A Sermon, Sec, p. 59. Guesses apart, I suppose it will be allowed that the name Colet is only a diminutive of Nicholas. The popularity of that saint made his namesakes multiply fast. " The southern nations almost always con tract their names by the omission of the first syllable, as the northern ones do by leaving out the latter ones ; and thus, while the English have Nick, the Italians speak of Cola, &c." See History of Christian Surnames (1863), vol. i. p. 214. 1 Letter to Justus Jonas {Epp. 1642, p. 705). 2 " Cives aliquot conjugatos," ib. I am aware that this has been explained by some to mean " formed into a Company," as the Mercers C 18 INTEODUCTION. reputation." And for the master of the school, there was to be chosen " a wedded man,1 a single man, or a priest that hath no benefice with cure ;" a direction which shows at least no preference of unmarried men for this office. We may conclude, therefore, that the exaltation of celibacy, which we find in this treatise, betokens an early and transition state of Colet's mind, and one which was afterwards greatly modified by what he saw of the evils of enforced celibacy among the clergy.2 Of those evils we have a sufficient account from contemporary writers.3 are. So Holland appears to have understood it {Heroologia Anglica, 1620, vol. ii. p. 155) : " Docuit ipse conjugatus, se nusquam reperisse minus corruptos mores quam inter conjugates." And yet the passage in Erasmus's letter, a little further on, which Holland is evidently quoting, shows beyond doubt what meaning the word was there intended to have. For the writer adds, as the reason for good prin ciples bein^ found among the " conjugati," that natural affection, the care of children, and domestic concerns, were so many barriers to keep them from falling into vice. Among the Harleian MSS. in the British Museum is a thin folio (marked 6037), containing Short Lives of various Divines. In his account of Colet, the writer says that " he always preferred the honest and honourable estate of matrimony before the unchast single life of priests ; " and again, of the " Head Master and Usher," " hee willed that they should be chosen out of the number of married men, than of priests with their suspected chastity." — But the account seems only to be a somewhat careless abstract of Erasmus or Holland. 1 The copy of the Statutes in Knight's Colet, p. 303, has " yf such may be gotten a wedded man." The autograph copy before referred to, as well as the two in Kennett's Collections, show that the words " yf such may be gotten," refer to the master's being learned " also in Greke," which precedes. 2 " Erasmus often referred to this wisdom and honesty of Dr. Colet in preferring a married man for the master of his school — and again, married men for the trustees and guardians of it ; because the coelibacie of the clergy was at that time run into infinite crimes and scandals." Kennett Collections, vol. xcvi. fol. 82, a ; where a passage is given, in testimony, from Erasmus's Dialogus de Recta Latini Grcscique ser- INTEODUCTION. 19 It will be interesting, for the completion of our knowledge of what Dean Golet wrote upon the Sacra ments, to compare the summary of religion which he drew up for the use of the " lytel babys and lytel children " of his school. It is prefixed to the Latin Accidence ' which he composed for the same purpose. monis pronuntiatione. I quote from Maire's edition of it (1643), p. 27. " Proinde Joannes Coletus, vir seterna dignus memoria, quum templo Divi Pauli scholam puerilem addidisset, nulla cura magis torquebatur, quam in quos ejus rei prsefecturam delegaret. Episcopi judicant hanc rem indignam sua solicitudine. Scholasteres censibus recipiendis se potius quam schohe curandse datos arbitrantur; et pulchre sibi videntur suo functi officio, si ludimagistros non deciment. In collegiis canonicorum fere deterior pars superat. Magistrates vel judicio carent, vel indulgent privatis affectibus. leo. Quid tandem consili reperit ? tjrsus. Hominem conjugatum, et liberis divitem, scholse prsefecit. Provisionem delegavit aliquot e civibus laicis, quo rum probitatem habere sibi videbatur exploratam ; ut ab his in bseredes proximos derivarentur. lbo. Num ea providentia securui% reddidit? tjestjs. Minime. Sed hie aiebat sibi videri minimum esse periculi, ut turn habebant res humanaa." Earlier in the same Dialogue {ib. p. 13) there is a striking picture drawn of the amount of care shown in the choice of schoolmasters ; which places Colet's attention to this matter in yet stronger relief: — " Ad hujus aut illius commendationem quemvis ludo prasficimus, fere indoctum, interdum et moribus improbis; non hue spectantes, ut rei charissimas, civium liberis, omnibus consulamus, sed ut unius famelici ventriculo prospiciamus ; accuratius circumspicientes cui committamus unum equum aut canem venatorem, quam cui credamus totius civitatis pignora." — See also Ridderus De Eruditione (1680), pp. 36-40. 3 Thus Melanchthon, writing in 1529 to Henry VIII, says : — " Ne mo non videt qualis sit vita coelibum : bonorum querela? notaa sunt, malorum turpitudo manifesta est." — Epp. 1642, p. 28. But the strongest testimony is that of Polydore Vergil, himself an ecclesiastic, and acquainted with Colet: — " Illud tamen dixerim, tan- tum abfuisse, ut ista coacta castitas illam conjugalem vicerit, ut etiam nullius delicti crimen majus ordini dedecus, plus mali religioni, plus doloris omnibus bonis impresserit, inusserit, attulerit, quam sacerdotum libidinis labes." — De Rerum Inventoribus (1644), p. 347. 1 The exact title of this work, an early edition of which is, I believe, 20 INTEODUCTION. The Articles of the Faith, or Creed, are as follows : — i. " I beleve in God the father almighty creatour of heven and of erth. ii. And in his sone Jesu Christ ower lorde. iii. Which was conceived by the holy gost, and born of the clene Virgen Marie. iiii. Which suffred under Poncio Pilato, and was very rare, is Joannis Coleti Theologi, olim Decani Divi Pauli, csditio,una cum quibusdam G. Lilii Grammatices rudimentis. There is a copy in the King's Library of the British Museum (marked C. 12. e. 5), printed at Antwerp, by Martin Csesar, in August 1535. It contains eighty- seven pages, of which 13 and 14 are missing. In the Grenville Library there is also a copy (marked 7475), printed in June 1536, which is perfect. I have not been able to discover any earlier edition, but I imagine there is no doubt as to this portion of the work being from Colet's own pen. In Strype's Stow (1720), vol. i. pp. 163 sqq. we are told that " Colet also framed a short Catechism in English for the youth of his school, which he obliged all to learn, and was used in the time of Popery to be bound up at the beginning of the Accidence." After a description of the parts of this Catechism, which corresponds with what is found in the editions above-mentioned, Strype concludes : — " If the superstitious parts of this Catechism had been laid aside, and the rest, which is very pious, had been retained for the use of the school, it would, in my opinion, have been very well done, and the Founder's Will more complied with." And in Pepys's Diary (1848), vol. ii. p. 439, there is the following entry under March 9, 1665: — "At Paul's School, where I visited Mr. Crumlum at his house . . . and he did, upon my declaring my value of it, give me one of Lillie's Grammers, of a very old im pression, as it was in the Caiholique times, which I shall set much by." From a previous entry, under Feb. 4, 1663, we have a further descrip tion of what was, no doubt, the same book : — " Mr. Crumlum .... also showed us upon my desire an old edition of the Grammer of Colett's, where his Epistle to the children is very pretty ; and in re hearsing the Creed it is said, ' borne of the cleane Virgin Mary.' " INTEODUCTION. 21 crucified and dyed, and was buried, and des cended to hel. v. Which rose again the third daye frome deth to life. vi. Which ascended into heven and sittethe at the right hande of the father almighty. vii. Which shal come againe and judge both quicke and deed. viii. I beleve in the holy gost the holy spirite of God. ix. I beleve in the holy chirche of Christ, which is the clene congregacion of faithful people in grace and communion of saintes onely in Christ Jesu. x. I beleve that in the Chirche of Christe is re mission of synnes both by baptime and by penaunce. xi. I beleve aftir this life resurreccion of oure deed bodyes. xii. I beleve at the last everlastinge life of body and soule. Amen." Next follow The Seven Sacramentes : — " I beleve also that by the seven Sacraments of the Chirch cometh grete grace to al that take them accordingly. i. By gracious ordre is given power to minister in God. ii. By gracious matrimony we ar born in to this worlde to God. iii. By gracious baptym we ar born agein the sones of God. 22 INTEODUCTION. iiii. By gracious counfirmation we are stablysshed in the grace of God. v. By gracyous Eucharistye where is ye very pre sence of the persone of Christ under forme of breed, we be nouresshed spiritually in God. vi. By gracious penaunce we rise againe from synne to grace in God. vii. By gracious Enoelinge and the laste anointinge we are in oure deth commended to God." After the Oratio Dominica, and Salutatio Angelica, there follows next a prayer to the Virgin Mary : " Sancta Maria, virgo et mater Jesu, age cum filio tuo, ut hs3C schola quotidie proficiat in ipso, utque omnes pueri in eadem discant ipsum et erudiantur in ipso, tandem ut perfecti filii Dei fiant per ipsum. Et tu quoque, Jesu benignissime, age cum patre tuo et patre nostro, ut gratia sui spiritus, nos suos filiolos faciat, sic te Jesu discere et imitari in hoc seculo, ut una tecum foeliciter regnemus in futuro." Immediately after which comes the Oratiuncula ad patrem [sic : leg. puerum~\ Jesum Scholce pro3sidem, which is given in Knight, p. 383. ' 1 I have been the more precise in giving the Prayer to the Virgin Mary at full, because there is no intimation of it in Knight, nor yet any Table of the Sacraments, as above. And yet, at p. 131 he says, speaking of some Prayers of Erasmus, " though made long before the foundation of Paul's School, they were never recommended to the boys ; nor indeed anything else of foppery or Popish superstition ; so that, considering the original constitution of it, it might be called the first Protestant School before the Reformation." So, indeed, it justly might ; but the reasons for saying so should be sound. St. Paul's School, like any other public institution, took the complexion of the INTEODUCTION. 23 It will be observed that, in the above Table of the Sacraments, Colet retains the same order as in his Treatise. Nor should the wording' of the Fifth escape notice. It is much nearer to the language of our own Church than it is to that of the Council of Trent.1 In the Carmina Scholaria* which Erasmus composed times. Thus in 1527, only eight years after Colet's death, we find the boys, under their master, Rightwise, acting a masque before the King at Greenwich, in which one character was " The heretic Luther, like a party-friar, in russet damask and black taffety." In Hall's Chronicle (ed. 1809), from which chiefly Froude {Hist. Eng. i. pp. 70-73) gives his interesting account of this entertainment, the scholars who acted are not stated to be from St. Paul's School. And in many of the accounts of these old plays, the " children of Paul's" must be understood of those in the Cathedral School. But in the present instance, a passage from the original document, given in Collier's History of English Dramatic Poetry (1831), vol. i. p. 110, shows clearly who are meant : — •" It. payd by me Rychard Gybson, for byer [beer] and aell and bred for xxxviii chylldern, the Master, the Ussher, and the Masstres, that et and dranke, 3s. 2d. It. Mast. Ryghtwos, Master of Powlls School, axethe to be alowed for dobelets, hossys [hosen] and schoos for the chylldern that were poore mens sons ; and for fyer in tyem of lernyng of the play, as by hys byll apperythe, 45s. Qd. ; so for kosts by the sayd Mast. Ryghtwos doon, sma. 45s. M." 1 Compare the SJwrte Catechisme . . . sett fourth by the Kings Majesties authoritie, for all scholemaisters to teach (1553 : reprinted in the Enchiridion Theologicum, 1825, vol. i. p. 30) :— " And even as by breade and wyne our natural bodies are susteined and nourished ; so by the body, that is, the flesh and bloude of Christ, the soule is fed through fayth, and quickened to the heavenlye and godly lyfe." Nor is the language of our present Catechism less similar. On the other hand, compare the decision of the Council of Trent {Sessio decima tertia, canon iv.) : — " Hsjc Synodus declarat, per con- secrationem panis et vini, conversionem fieri totius substantias panis in substantiam corporis Christi ; " and the Cateehismus, Pars ii. § 40. 2 Of which, by the kindness of F. Seebohm, Esq., I have seen editions of 1512,-14,- 16, and -20. As they are correctly reprinted in Knight, p. 125, I do not quote from them. 24 INTEODUCTION. for use in the new school, there is a remarkable absence of anything like invocation of saints, or of the Virgin Mary. There was one hymn, indeed, which we are told was sung by the children on enter ing and leaving school,1 which it is to be feared is lost. At least there is nothing among the extant Carmina Scholaria of Erasmus which quite answers to the description. The present High Master of St. Paul's School, Dr. Kynaston, whose graceful pen has done so much to supply the want of which he complains, says in the Preface to his Cantica Coletina : — " Eras mus was our first contributor; and happy indeed should we be, if we possessed the hymn which he tells us was daily sung before the picture of the Child Jesus at the entering and departing of the children." At the end of a little parchment-covered book,2 of which the title-page runs Continentur in hoc libello plena; pietatis aliquot Erasmi lucubraciunculo3 : Concio de puero Jesu : Oratio ad Deum : Pcean ad divam Virginem : Oratio ad deiparam Mariam, there are some short pieces in Latin verse, by Cornelius Gra- pheus,3 of Alst. One of these pieces, entitled In 1 " And all the young fry when they come in and go out of school (beside their appointed prayers) salute Christ with an hymn ; winch you may read amongst Erasmus's Epigrams." Smith's translation of the Letter to Justus Jonas, &c. (1661), p. 66, and u. So in Fuller's Abel Redivivus (1651), p. 100. " Whom the children as they entered the schoole were wont to salute with a sacred Hymne, composed, if I be rightly informed, by Erasmus." I know not on what authority this hymn was ascribed to Erasmus. 2 Brit. Mus. 4375. a. It bears date Lovanil, 1514. ;i See an account of him iu Appendix ii. of vol. i. of Ullman's Reformers before the Reformation (tr. by Menzies, 1855). He was INTEODUCTION. 25 nativum, Hiesum Ode, contains stanzas which might possibly have been so sung. The whole is too long to be quoted here ; but I give the first and last, with one of the intermediate stanzas : — " Salve, parve puellule, Salve, maxime ccelitum, Et rerum pater omnium ; Salve, dulcis hiesu. Vagis, parve puellule : Ne vagi, pue ; parvuli Te multi puerum pueri_ Optant visere dulcem. Atque hsec nostra tenerrimo Affectu data votula Illi, indigna Deo licet, Offer, Diva, precamur." Occurring, as it does, in the same book with the Concio depuero Jesu, which was composed for delivery in St. Paul's School, it is barely possible that this ode, or some portion of it, was the hymn referred to by Erasmus ; but that is the most that can be said. There is a little work, commonly assignee1 ^o Colet, which has been often reprinted, under the title of Daily Devotions, or the Christian's Morning and Even ing Sacrifice . . . by John Colet, D.D.1 Of this, the first born in 1482, the year before Luther, and in 1520 published Goch's work on Christian Liberty, for which, the year after, he was imprisoned. He was a friend of Erasmus, but not a thorough-going Reformer. 1 " There are extant two speeches of his made to the Convocation ; some Essays upon*fc.ammar, Prayers for daily use, and an Exhorta tion to a Holy Life." — Collier's Ecclesiastical History (1852), vol. iv. p. 30. But the account is very inaccurate : thus Colet's father is called Sir John Colet ; Polydore Vergil is Vigil, &o. In a commu nication to Notes and Queries, Aug. 1, 1863, p. 94, mention is made of 26 INTEODUCTION. piece alone, headed in the later editions An useful Direction in order to a Good Christian Life, but in the original A right fruitfull Admonition concerning the order of a good Christian Man's Life, is Colet's compo sition. The reader will see a great contrast between the plain, practical tone of the following extract 1 from it, and that which he caught from Dionysius : — " If thou be religious, remember that the due execution of true religion is not in wearing of the habite, but with a cleane mynde in very deed to execute the rules and ordinances of religion. For so it is, that to weare the habite* and not to execute the rule and order of religion, is rather to be deemed hypocrisie, or apostasie, than otherwise. If thou be lay and un- maried, keepe thee cleane unto the time thou be maried. And remember the sore and terrible punishmente of Noe's flood, and of the terrible fyre and brimstone and sore punishment of Sodome and Gomor, done to man for misusing of the fleshe. . . . And if thou intende to mary, or be maried, and hast a Anthony a Wood reckoning the Daily Devotions among Colet's works ; but the writer adds, " its authenticity appears questionable." I think I can trace the history of the book. In 1577 there was printed for Gabriel Cawood a little volume (Brit. Mus. C. 21, a.) con sisting of three treatises : (1 ) A righte fruitfull admonition, concern ing the order of a good Christian man's life . . . . made by the famous Doctour Colete ; (2) A Godly Treatise, declaring the benefites .... of Prayer. Written in Latin fourtie yeers past by an Englishman of great vertue and learning ; (3) A brefe Treatise exhorting sinners to Repentance. The first of these treatises was kept prefixed to a volume which grew and altered, somewhat after the manner of a modern hymn- book, and gradually caused the name of Colet's Daily Devotions to be given to the whole. I have seen the 19th, 20th, and 22nd editions (1684-1722), and in the first of these three, Colet's treatise is still left unpaged. 1 I quote from the edition of 1577, leaf 5, a. INTEODUCTION. 27 good wife, thanke our Lord therefore, for she is of his sending. And remember that three thinges in es- peciall bene pleasaunt to the spirite of God ; that is to say, concord betwene brethren, love and charitie betwene neighbours, and a man and his wyfe wel agreeing. And if thou have an evyl wife, take pa- cience, and thanke God ; for all is for the best, well taken. Howbeit thou art bounde to doo and pray for her amendement, least she go to the Devyl, from whom she came. And have in remembraunce, that the intent of mariage is not in the beastly appetite or pleasure in the thing ; but the intent thereof is to eschewe the sinne of the fleshe, or els to have children. And if thou have children, as much as thou mayest, bring them up in vertue, to be the servauntes of God : for it is better for thee and them not to be borne, than to be otherwise." Having said thus much, I will do no more than present the reader with a brief Synopsis of Colet's Treatise, and leave him to form his judgment from the Treatise itself. He will now be prepared, I think, to regard it only as " representmg a phase of thought through which Colet passed;" not as the work of his maturest years. Dean Colet never ceased indeed to believe in the reality of that spiritual mar riage and union betwixt Christ and His Church, which is so fully discoursed of in the following pages ; but he came to look on earthly marriage as no more "common or unclean;" but as a state in which the " sacrifice of righteousness " might still be offered to God. That prolem justitias, of which he speaks again and again, Colet in his time largely 28 INTEODUCTION. helped to bring forth. But we must look for it less in the written works which he has left behind, than in the effects which he wrought upon the men of the age in which he lived. When we think of the versa tile and prolific, but less stable, genius of Erasmus, it is hardly wrong to say, that to the femineus homo there, he was the Vir Deus. And what he was for men like Erasmus and More, he has been, in measure, for thousands of others, whose tale is not yet num bered. His association with them has been in truth a fecundissima conjunctio. His writings fill no volume with their titles only, as do those of Erasmus; his presence does not pervade the history of that period, like the presence of Wolsey : but, when we learn to. trace events to their source, and actions to their motives; to look beyond the decrees of king and pope, beyond the printing-presses of Basle and Paris and London and Louvain, we may begin to feel his true greatness. And the estimate of Southey1 will then seem to us scarcely an exaggerated one, when he pronounced him to be " the best and wisest of his age. 1 Common-Place Book. Second Series (1849), p. 332. SYNOPSIS. ROM God all things have their being, form, and per fection. He is the true Priest, and the source of all priesthood in heaven and earth. He himself is perfect Purity, Light, and Goodness ; and the priestly office is an unceasing imitation of Him in these three qualities. The Angels first fulfil this office ; and being consecrated as priests to God in a threefold order, through purification, illumination, perfec tion, they offer to Him the sacrifice of righteousness. In the world their office consists in the restoration of a true and right order in things. Hence the name of Orders given to the priesthood Page 35 II. The first Sacrament instituted was that of Orders, or Priesthood. By this sacrament were the heavenly intelligences bound to fight, in the strength of God, for the restoring of unity, beauty, and perfection, where the enemy had brought in multiplicity, deformity, and defect. The Mosaic Priesthood, with its multitude of sacrifices and obla tions, was a shadow of the heavenly hierarchy. In this world, which is the temple of God, the three ternaries of Angels spread the threefold rays of God, the divine Sun, in purifica tion, illumination, and perfection . . . Page 38 III. In the heavenly natures there are, moreover, all the other Sacra- 30 SYNOPSIS. ments, but after a spiritual manner. These are Marriage, Penitence, Baptism, Confirmation, Eucharist, Extreme Unction. There is the Sacrament of Marriage, because the heavenly spirits are as a wife to God, their husband. To Him they cling, and from Him they become fruitful for the propagation of righteousness. Whilst towards God they are as the wife, towards mankind they are as the husband, making them in turn prolific with the offspring of righteousness. Hence Marriage and Priesthood are one and the same ; righteous ness at once the offspring and the sacrifice. Of this spiritual marriage the earthly rite is but a poor and empty shadow. A fuller discussion of this being reserved till afterwards, a rapid survey may be taken of the manner in which the other Sacraments are solemnized in the world, which is the temple of God . . . Page 42 IV. The Sacrament of Penitence might more properly be called that of Reconciliation. It is carried on by the spiritual, or sacerdotal part of created beings, whose office is to restore order in disorder. This they do by acting on the lower, the corrupt and sensual part, and renewing in it the image of God. For this work of purifying, illumining, confirming, and finally per fecting that which is fallen, signs arid sacraments are needed. For man, whose nature is twofold, spiritual and corporeal, these sacraments are of a like twofold nature. There is in them the visible ( sign and the invisible thing signified . . Page~43 V. In the ministry, which the heavenly hierarchy performs, we may conceive that there are offices like those in the Church on earth, but of far higher order. These are Ostiarii, or door-keepers ; Lectorcs, or readers ; Exorcists ; Acolytes and Sub-Deacons. They are exercised in the work of purification, as the two higher grades are in the works of illumination and perfection. The functions of the inferior orders above-mentioned are described. These, as well as the two superior orders, all work after, a pattern from God. In the Mosaic Church there was the, slSkdow; in the Christian Church there, is^ the image, or visMeJigiij' in heaven there \ is the reality. The sketchjmust precede the~nmshed^iicture. So with/ respect to the Sacraments. Among the AngersThefels the reajity of that which they symbolize to us. We have but the figure Page 46 SYNOPSIS. 31 VI. On the origin of that evil which made sacraments necessary. The Angels, who fell from their first estate, have not ceased to devise | mischief against mankind. Hence the Temptation in Eden, the Fall, j and man's subsequent misery. But as Adam fell, not without being tempted, he had an excuse which the Devil had not. Hence a way_of restoration was opened to him. As man was created to be the Spouse of Christy he had now to i be re-created. The words of St. Paul are repeated, touching " the depth "of*the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God," in thus bringing good out qfeviL In this re-creation the goodness of God is shown even more strikingly ¦than in the first creation of manr" There was no cause why man should not be created at the beginning, but afterwards there was cause why he (should not be created anew. The effect of this mercy is shown in an increase of humility on the part of man, whose nature, divested of its old clothing, and arrayed in I wedding garments, is then fitted to be united in marriage to God. f This union"being so great and wonderful, the sacramenT of it was j ordained to precede the Fall. (Eve, taken from the side of Adam, was a sign of the Church taken from the side of Christ? The command, " increase TmTTnultiply," foretokened the Jnultiplying of a spiritual offspring. Thus Adam's prophecy is fulfilled, and Christ and His Church are^ joined together in one Spirit. This is the " great mystery," of which St. Paul writes to the Ephesians, and the depth of which he does not attempt to fathom. ' Adam was " the figure of Him that was to come : " one theforogeni- ""tor of the flesh, unto_death); the (other 'of the spirit, unto life.') (In (Christ jthere ought not to be any propagation of the flesh; the only'' /offspring to be sought for being that of righteousness. ^-v/U. Man, as carnal, cannot be united with God, who is spiritual. There must therefore be a mortifying of the flesh, and a (quickening again in , the spirit. This trutEls largely enforced by passages from St. Paul's Epistles. dv^; * . . . The fruits_ofthis union betwixt Christ and His Church are described \ by St. Paul to the Galatians ; and are, in brief, the works of righteous- I ness. ^ / To the4niman nature in Christ the tftrorcj^js as_ a sister ; to the \ ( divine nature in Him as a wife ; to God the Father as a married \daughter. / CRhI the Father is the King who would make a marriage for His Son. That Son is the ffi Husband, the source of all true marriage 32 SYNOPSIS. !in heaven and earth. In this heavenly union mankind would have been joined to Him from the first, but for the transgression in Eden. God, who foresaw the spiritual adultery that mankind would com mit, foreordained also the restoration from it ; and earthly marriage was instituted as a sign from the beginning of the spiritual union that ' should be. At length, in the fulness oftinie, Christ came down from heaven as 1 the Bridegroom ; leaving Him who was at once His father and His > mother, to cleave unto His wife the Church. ** Before such a bride could be prepared, " not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing," much time and labour must be spent. For this end a better and purer part of mankind wore all along kept I reserved by the providence of God, till what had been growing ripened | at length in the fruit of the " stem of Jesse," Jesus; made '• male land female;" male, in His divinity, female in His humanity; through which humanity He was to draw to Himself the rest of mankind that were needed "to complete the Church, IDs Bride. This being the only true marriage, Dionysius is therefore, perhaps, silent on marriage in his Ecclesiastical Hierarchy, because its Sacra- . ment preceded the institution of the Church. For the completion of His bride, the Church, by gathering in all of imankind that remains to be united to it/Christ, our High Priest, ordains His children to labour as priests under Him. By the remaining Sa- jcraments of Penitence, Baptism, Confirmation, Eucharist, and Extreme Unction, as by visible cords, the rest are thus drawn to Him. In this work they imitate Christ, and are in turn themselves as hus- \ bands to the rest of the world ; the fruit of their intercourse being righteousness. David meant this when he wrote, " Offer the sacrifices of righteous ness;" and the same is shown to be the meaning of St. Paul in various passages. The offspring and the sacrifice are one. In offering i this sacrifice, there is an active and there is a passive element in the | Church; but both together make up that "spiritual house" and "holy ; priesthood " of which St. Peter speaks . Page 50 VII. r The propagation of the flesh, through earthly marriage, though (allowed by St. Paul to the Corinthians, of necessity rather than of free ¦will,, is in itself not a thing of Christ. Neither is any such marriage, nor the issue of it, required in Christianity ; though to the weak it may ,bo needful to permit it. Provided that the reality of the Sacrament have been obtained, the sacramental character disappears from it. Heathen dom woidd have supplied material enough for the work of regeneration; even though in this respect the Church had been barren. Nor nood SYNOPSIS. 33 there have been any fear that all the world would grow Christian, when, even under tho name of Christianity, the greater part were heathens. Hence St. Paul would have all men to be even as he himself was; although, for the avoidance of greater evils, he gave permission to marry. Yet it is to be wished that all the Christian world were in celibaoy, as was the desire of St. Paid himself. Orders and marriage are thus proper to the higher, or masculine, part of the Church ; in which part are various ranks of ministers, as before said. Their office is to act upon the weaker and feminine part.'i that it may bring forth the fruits of righteousness . . Page 73 VIII. As the righteousness which is thus brought forth is from God, and is the reflection of the light of truth and goodness which streams down from Him ; so, that man may be able to show this image reflected in himself, he must be purified and changed from that " multiplicity^" which is akin to sin and death, to " simplicity ", whicli is truth and I life. -* ^fw,^-^ I In restoring this "inner man," and "single eye," is the work of the priesthood. It is only in the light of God that men can "see J light." While distracted by the manifold affairs of the world, men in j reality are not. They must therefore be drawn back from such a disso lution, and reunited to God, " by the bringing in of a better hope." The old clothing must be stripped off, that the renewed man may be fit for heavenly raiment ; the vessel cleansed, that it may be refilled. Thus, the first work of the priesthood is purification, and the bring ing in of a better hope. Men in this state are Catechumens, on whom the others act as Readers, Exorcists, and the like. The Penitence which this purification brings about must be sincere and real. ~ There must be compensation for wrongs done, as well as '. confession of them. Until a man is thus purified, he is not in the ,' mystical body of Christ. As this is rather a preparation for Sacra* ments than a Sacrament itself, therefore Dionysius does not expressly) treat of it. Our penitence may often have to bo repeated ; such is the fluctu ating character of the warfare we wage. But, though he who falls and rises again is not to be compared with him who has never fallen, yet God will have compassion on us at every fresh effort to recover our selves. At such times there is joy in heaven. It is not the office of Sacraments to scatter darkness and cleanse away defilement, but to introduce light. Those results then of neces- \ sity follow. Hence Baptism iiTspeciaiiy called by Dionysius the Sacra- '< ment of Illumination. In it there is the presence of the Spirit of Light. 34 SYNOPSIS. i By the approach of that, light, the little ^ cloud of_ original sin is dis- j pelled from infants : adults must of themselves confess and abjure their sins. This they can only do by the help of God. Through the inter vention of the Sacrament, the will of God for their release from their sins is communicated to them. No sins are remitted which the peni tent himself does not remit by his_own confession; none are retained which the sinner himself does not retain. There is no remission of Sins but from God ; the priest who absolves only declares and confirms ;he will to repent, on the part of the sinner, and the will to pardon, on ihe side of God. This Sacrament, which the later Church called Penitence, might fitly be called Reconciliation and Remission . . . Page 78 f1 rx. Baptism iljuimnesjthose who_ are purified, and is the seal of faith he- stowed by God. Confirmation witnesses the sure gift of the Holy 1 Spirit. It took its rise from the sending of Peter and John to Samaria, and might be called the Sacrament of the gifts of the Holy Ghost. The Sacrament of Communion in the food of Christ's flesh and blood shared in^common, is the feeding and nourishing of those who have been confirmed. Lastly, Extreme Unction, which used to be performed after death also, but now at the last extremity, so far as that can be discerned, is the Sacrament of labour done and warfare ended. It has its warrant in the words of St. James. " There are many Anointings in the Church, which are the divers ex hortations of the Holy Ghost. His coming, and the effects wrought by jHim, are what Sacraments signify to the faithful, to their eternal salvation ... ..... Page 92 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESLZE. per .Filium cum ^udtu DrmariJ '* DEO Patre sancto sunt, formantur, et perficiuntur omnia. A sanctissima Trinitate omnis % consecratio est; videlicet a Deo per Filium cum Spiritu sancto. Deus jrerus sacerdos est, a quo omne sacerdotium in coelo et in terra nominatur. In Deo vere sunt omnia; extra Deum \ imitatio est Dei. In Deo, qui aejernus est, seterna sunt omnia. Illic paternitas et filiatio' et amor et sacerdotium seternum est. Sacerdotium illic est qui- dem, ut ita dicam, sacerdotificans ; omne enim sacer- I dotium a Deo est, sacerdotum. sacerdote : sacerdotale munus es[t qu£e]dam Dei assidua-imitatio in puritate, \ luce, et bonitate. Deus ipse est puritas, lux, et ] bonitas. Post Deum haec relucent_in angelis, quos Deus, summus sacerdos, purificando, illuminando, et perficiendo,1 sibi consecravit. Consecravit autem et 1 Perficiendo.] Purification, illumination, and perfection, are the three objects ... of _£he,.SacramentSj and give exercise to the threefold order of the ministry. Thus in the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy, c. vi. 36 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESI^I. dedicavit sibi, ut angeli in se triunum Deum in hac trinitate referant. Quatenus hsec tria eminentissime in Deo sunt; Deus est ipse qui colitur et cui sacrifi- catur. Quatenus sanctificator ille haec propagans creat, illuminat, perficit, sacerdos est mirifice et sa- crificans sibi et aliis sacerdotes consecrans. Effectus illius benignissimi divini sacerdotii primus in angelis est; qui in tanto consecratore et summo pontifice evaserunt feliciter sacerdotes consecrati Deo ab ipso ! Deo, ut Deum deinceps consecratione imitentur : imi- ' tentur, inquam, consecrando, sacrificandoque triplici ilia ratione purgandi, illuminandi et perficiendi, qua, ipsi Deo sunt consecrati. Propagatio enim oportet sit Dei, et illius benignitatis derivatio.1 In hoc officio qui sunt, in sancto Dei sacerdotio sunt. Quod sacerdotali munere sanctificatur Deo, sacerdotis sacri- i ficium est Deo acceptissimum. Velit Deus ut sacer- / dotes sacrificent sibi in sanctificatione, sicut ille pars iii. Dionysius writes, " Conclusimus igitur, sancta quidem mysteria I purgationem esse et illuminationem atque perfectionem: ministros i vero, purgantem ordinem ; sacerdotes autem, illuminantem ; consum- ! mantem autem sive consecrantem, divinos esse pontifices." I have thought it best, in the quotations from Dionysius, to give the Latin version of Ambrosius (1498) ; which alone, probably, Colet had read. The first Greek edition was the Juntine, in 1515. 1 Derivatio.] The first chapter of the Celestial Hierarchy com mences with the words of St. James, i. 17, " Every good gift, and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights." Hence we are to learn that we best imitate God by be coming in turn the bestowers of good. Colet aptly expresses this thought in the introduction to the abstract of the Celestial Hierarchy which he has made for a friend : — " In his qua? didicimus in eo libro id vel primum et maximum est, ut, quicquid aliunde accepimus boni, . id_benigniter deinceps impartiamus .aliis et communicemus ; hoc imi- I tati inestimabilem Dei bonitatem, qui largitur se et ordine^ommunicat universis." School MS. fol. 1, a. DE SACEAMENTIS ECCLESLE. 37 sanctificans sacerdotes ipsos sibi [sacrificat.J Pro- ] pagatio Deitatis maximum et proprium est Deo sacrificium. Opus enim est ardentissimae- charitatis, | et ob id quidem opus justissimum. Justitia Deus placatur mirifice. Hinc illud Davidicum, " Sacrifi-[ps.iv. e. Cate sg;crincium justitiae." Inter se mutuo et sine) >c-<4 intermissione angeli sacerdotale munus exercent, sa- crificantque justitiam. Item fit extra se, ut quam latissime in Deo justi appareant. Moliuntur omni cpnatu in Or dine ipso ordinante constantem et justum ordinem in rebus. Hie effectus sacerdotalis muneris est. Unde sacerdotium 0.rdp a recentiori ecclesia s cognominatum est. Ordinata in ordinatores; ordi- natores in Ordinem1 ipsum referuntur. OrJ.o ipse ratio est Dei ilia omniformis, ab intima Dei mente " deprompta, tota et ad^quataj)ivinitatis summi,, ipsa " pulchritudo, quod ipsum est verbum Dei exjalto ore i prolatum, Deum totum intimo exitu plenissime, ex-' pressissime significans; quo, pulcherrimo ordine, die-' tata sunt omnia. In quo ab ordinatis in propaga- tionem ordinis laboratur. Primum et maxime in stab^m_et justum ordinem rerum sacerdotali officio i expurgans, illustrans et perficiens, Ordo ipse agit et operatur; et in eo deinceps qui sunt ordines, ordine quisque suo. Primus ergo sacerdos est Ordo ipse, ) et primus ordo Sacerdos ipse. Hie est sacratissimus Dei asternus Filius, cui Pater in ore David haec verba habuit : " Tu es sacerdos in aeternum, secundum or- Ps. cix. 4. *- — — / ~ 1 Ordinem.] Thus, in the De Divinis Nominibus, c. iv. pars i. God is called *2£WiJ>rj0rder. In the same passage Dionysius speaks of the " supersubstantiale illud pulchrum," in God, which draws, and as \ it were calls men to itself : — " unde etiam pulchritudo greco vocabulo calos, a vocando, dicitur.'' I 38 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIiE. /dinem Melchisedech," cujus ordinis neque principium I neque finis agnoscitur. Itaque aeternus sacerdos est Dei, ipse Deus sacerdotificans : idem aeternus Dei ordo; ipse Deus ordinans omnia, a quo omnis sacer- dotalis ordo est, et omne ordinatum sacerdotium. Ille ordo et sacerdos primum ordinavit sacerdotium in coelis sanctissimorum spirituum; in quibus est : illuminatio, purgatio et perfectio,1 et inter se maxime ; ipsorum, et omnium. Sacerdos etiam ille primus et exemplaris, in quo sunt omnia, qui ipse est omnia verissime, is ipsum est etiam sacramentum sacrificans omnia, omniaque sacramenta faciens, quae omnia ipsum referant, sacramentorum sacramentum. II. ! Primum autem conditum sacramentum, per quod deinde omnia alia sacramenta condantur, erat quod :; ordinem vocant et sacerdotium. In principio a Sa- cerdote ipso et Ordine. Consecravit enim et aperte astrinxit Sacramento felicissimos illos spiritus, ut in ipso ordinum auctore sancte et ordinate commilitent. Militia enim in Deo omne sacerdotium est; ut, in viribus Dei, Dei creaturam a rationibus Deo con- | J 'Perfectio.] The Celestial Orders themselves being spoken of as ifulfilling these offices for one another, not merely for mankind. Thus, \Eccl. Hier. c. vi. p. iii : " Ita sunt et qui illuminantur ordines, et qui consummantur ; purgantes item et illuminantes ac perficientes in hier archia ccelesti. Quando supremse ilia? divinioresque substantias infe- riores sacras ccelestesque distinctiones ignorantia omni emundant in ordinibus ac proportionibus ccelestium functionum, ipsasque sacratiorum doctrmarum fulgore implent atque perficiunt." DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIIE. 39 trariis vindicent; utque agant ut Deus ubique et in omnibus luculente appareat. Quoniam authores ma- litiae nequitiaeque indesinenter agunt, ut sibi ex bono malum exaugeant ; ut, quemadmodum depravaverint se, ita alia quaecumque, quoad possunty; in meremen- tum1 malr> depravent ; cceleste sacerdotium conse- cratur Deo, et sacramentali nexu obligatur, ut in uno pulchro et bono Deo unitatem,2 pulchritudinem et perfectionem rerum conquirant et conservent, a rationibus videlicet contrariis, multiplicitate, defor- mitate et defectu, quae assidue moliuntur in mundo qui sua ipsorum improbitate apostatarunt, ex Lucifero ' illo factus tenebrifer, Diabolus, et satellites ejus. ; Sacratissimi illi, quos dedicavit sibi Deus ipse, statim post defectionem illorum qui in suum malum cor- ruerunt, in Mc rerum universitate, quod Dei est _, templum, exstant magnifici sacerdotes summi Dei, et industriosi exercitus magni Dei SabaotEf tales facti a Deo, ut pro datis viribus sine intermissione in\ mundo, suapte natura labente, conquirant Deo justi- I tiam, justitiamque consacrificent. Quorum assiduita- I tern in hac parte, Moysaicum sacerdotium, quod ) scatet hostiis et immolationibus, plenissime adum+si* 1 In mer. mali.] " To become subjects, or material, of evil." Me- rementum is a word thaFEaiT"come from materia, through the length- '¦ ened form materiamentum. The form merrementum is found in ; Statutes of the year 1246. — Glossarium Manuale (1776). 8 Both Dionysius and Colet lay much stress on the divineness of unitas. Compare the De Divinis Nominibus, c. xiii : " Denique si unum tollas, neque totem erit, neque pars aliqua, neque aliud quic- quam in rebus. Omnia enim in seipso unum uniformiter praaaccipit atque complectitur . . . . Et expedit ut nos quoque a multis ad unum, virtute divinse unitatis, conversi, unice laudemus totam atque unam deitatem, unum, omnium causam." 40 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESL/E. brat.1 Illi ergo imitantes exemplar et causam omnis sacerdotii, ordinem etiam et justitiam ipsam, in pro- pagatione justitiae Dei elab[orant], hoc maxime sacri- ficantes Deo, et vero suo fungentes officio sacerdotali, iquod est quidem, in sole Deo, triplici Dei^adio / purgatorio, illuminatorio et perfectorio, et quam late fieri potest et quam longe, copiosum justitiae fructum parere et procurare. Quoniam sacerdotium est certe imitatio Dei in amplificationejustitiaa. In eo munere ! ordines illi angelorum, numero novem (sicuti describit ': Dionysius),2 longe excellunt et antiquitate et veritate. Qui consecrati et consummati ordines in creatura, 1 Adumbrat.] Eccl. Hier. c^vj?. jh " Cum parvuli essemus .... legale indulsit sacerdotium, obscuris verarum rerum imaginibus et figuris, a primitivis suis remotissimis, signisque haud facile penetrabi- libus ac typis opertam habentibus neque discerni facilem intelhgentiam ; congruam, et viribus nostris convenientem lucem; ut imbecillioribus ocuhs innocue infulgens." 2 Ccelestis Hierarchia, c. vi : " Omnes simul coelestes immorta- lesque substantias in novem ordines divinus sermo distinxit, propriisque ac significantibus vocabuhs appellavit. Has eximius praeceptor noster in ternas tertio repetitas distinctiones ad Sancta? Trinitatis divisit imaginem. Ac primam quidem esse ait quae coram Deo versetur semper, idque ex divina dignatione susceperit, ut illi inhsereat jugiter, nulhsque mediis interjectis spiritibus, inseratur. Nam sanctissimos Thronos, et oculis plurimis alisque praeditos ordines, Cherubin, scilicet, et Seraphin, Hebrseorum voce appellatos, juxta Deum, nullis mediis insertis agminibus, eminenti propinquitate locates ait; idque sancta- rum Scripturarum tradere expositionem Secundam vero asseruit, quae Potestatibus, Dominationibus, Virtutibusque conficiter. Tertiam item, quse in ccelestibus functionibus extremum teneat locum, ,ex Angelis et Archangelis Principatibusqae constantem." i These three ternaries are illustrated in Ambrosius's Version by a diagram, such as Colet has several times adopted in the following The Reader will hardly need to be reminded of Paradise Lost (v. 600) :— v " Hear all ye Angels, progeny of light, Thrones, Dominations, Princedoms, Virtues, Powers." DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESM). 41 mundi, Dei templo, perfecti sacerdotes sunt, sanctis- sime se in sacrificiis laudis exercentes. In quo mundo constituit Deus angelos sacerdotes, ut sibi ¦ merementum Dei sacrificent in omnibus ; id est, sim- v J plicem et veram bonitatem. Dei filius [est] summus < et aeternus pontifex, condens et templum mundi, et angellcos ac spiritales sacerdotes, item sacramenta et sacrificia constituens omnia ipse in omnibus sacrifi- cantibus, sacrificans .Deo Patri . suo, ut universus I mundus nihil sit nisi templum, sacerdotium et sacri- j ficia Deo, in eo qui ipse est templum templi, et I sacerdotii et sacrificii Veritas ; — Deo Patri suo, a quo aeterniter accepit omnia, et ut sit templum, sacerdos et sacrificium. Primus itaque et summus pontifex \ est Deus ipse, cujus sacra est sedes templum creaturte, in quo sacerdotes sunt angeli, in quo sacrificium est simplex veraque justitia; quam ut sacrificent, quin immo ut inter sacrificandum ministri sint (pontifex est enim ipse qui omnia in omnibus consacrificat), in perpetuum sacerdotium Deo consecrantur. Quo fit ut in sacramentis prior et antiquior sit Ordo, et Sa-; cerdotium, in templo mundi a Deo conditum. Pon-1 tificia majestas, sacerdotium consecrans, aeterna est. , f Pater, a quo omnia, etj.d_qu.ejn_ omnia; et templum et sacer- Deus< dotium et sacrificium. ^ (r. v -w''.^ LFilius, aeternus et coeequalis Patri ; Primus pontifex et ordo ipse. , , .._ . ~) In propaganda justitia Angeli, sacerdotes pontificis. ¦ j r~ s ' . ^ , -n, ¦ m mundo verum sacer- Mundus universus, templum Dei. >, .,„ „ „ , „ffi .„ . , . i • vi- ' dotale munus est om- Sacrfficium in mundo, simplex veraque justiua. i . 42 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIiE. III. Sunt praeterea in spiritalibus naturis reliqua sacra menta omnia, sed modo spiritali et angelico ; Matri- monium, Poenitentia, Baptismus, Confirmatio, Eucha- ristia, Extrema Unctio. Nam, tanquam uxorJDei, adhaerent Deo divini illi spiritus, et fecundantur ab ipso, et, fecundati divino semine, divinam similitudi- nem propagant. Item uxores in Deo viri sunt, aliosque tanquam feminas sibi asciscunt, et quodam sancto coitu impregnant. Sic a primo viro et marito fmaritaceo procedit quae est inferioris partis attractio sursum1 a superiore, et amplexu astrictio, ut fecun- detur in eo, et pro capacitate plena sit divin^onitate et justitia, quae tota est derivata a Deo, quae viros jfacit, ut hi feminas faciant viragines; atque ut sic vicissitudinario matrimonio jujjtfficetur mundus Jn \ justo Deo. Finis ejus veri matrimonii est fecundifcas justitiae ; aut ex adhaesione,2 quae ipsa est justitia, aut illis quae ab ipso justificantur. Verus vir et maritus est primus ille pontifex, in quo est omnis maritatio in fecunditatem omnium, ut sterilia quaeque in se, subjecta vel Deo vel subjectis Deo, alicujus justitiae fructus fiant feracia atque tenera, spiritali mente ex- 1 So Dionysius describes the Order which is in the second, or ! middle, stage of illuminatio, as " communione sacrS omni cum volup- tate acquiescentem, et ad divinum ipsorum scientiffi amorem, subnixum j eorum subvehentibus virtutibus, pro modo suo evolantem." — Cosiest. I Hier. c. vi. The Greek word is still more literally rendered in the Latin version \ appended to the Venice Edition of 1755 : — " Per anagogicas virtutes." ! 2 Some pronoun, perhaps ei, seems to have been missed here. So et seems wanting before spiritali mente ex., just below. DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESMI. 43 aminentur. Idem est sacerdotium quod matrimo- nium, et sa[crificatio idem] est quod prolificatio. Quum enim in mundo grqlem justitiae fecisti, sacrifi- casti Deo. Hujus matrimonii] leyj.s_et inanis umbra ' est id quod est maris et feminae in propagationem carnis ; de cujus institutione, et quid velit, dicemus postea prolixius. Nunc autem cursim et leviter, in hoc magno mundi templo sub pontifice Deo quomodo celebrantur reliqua sacramenta, volumus annotare; ut a primis fontibus derivata oratio influat in id melius quod intendimus. Habemus enim in pro- posito loqui expressius de sacramentis ecclesiae nos- trae, quibus quasi jurati Deo nostro in Jesu Christo militamus. IV. PosNiTENTiA vero, quae longe rectiiis reconciliationis sacramentum vocaretur, et reditus a deteriori ad~Ia < quod melius est, quae semper est cum pcenitentia de licti et confessione peccati et voluntate recompen- sandi,1 ut confessio etiam et satisfactio possit vocari aeque ac pcenitentia; illud, inquam, reconciliationis sacramentum, quod posteriori ecclesiae placuit poeni- tentiam appellare, in alienatis et lapsis assidue a sacerdotali mundi parte agitur, qui spiritus sunt, qui ordines illi ? relevant, et quodque ad suum statum re- 1 " In perfectiorie autem poanitentiae tria observanda sunt, scilicet, compunctio cordis, confessio oris, satisfactio operis .... Haec est fructifera pcenitentia ; ut, sicut tribus_modis deum offendimus, scilicet, corde, ore, et opere, ita tribus modis satisfaciamus." — Petri Lombardi Sententics (1575), lib. ivTT^isUncT. xvi.~" I 2 Ordines illi.] So in MS. The sense appears obscure ; unless illi may signify " to Him," i. e. " God." 44 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. stituunt, ut in ordinatis a Deo, qui ipse est Ordo, suum ordinem teneant. Ex infirmitate rerum trans- gressiones et casus sunt frequentes in mundi parte inferiore et corporali. Qu6d si a superiori et spiritali parte revocata non sustinerentur, defluxus rerum suapte impotentia in malum et deforme evaderet in nihilum. In hoc ergo magni mundi templo, pars ilia purgata, illuminata, confirmata, perfecta, pars vide licet ilia a Deo sibi consecrata et sacerdotalis, pars spiritalis et angelica, sacerdotale munus exercet quasi sacramentali ratione, atque corpoream partem infir- mam et impuram purgat et stabilit, quoad fieri possit, in esse spiritali, ut pro captu illuminetur et perfi- ciatur in Deo ; ut a divisione ad unum, a deformitate ad pulchritudinem, a defectu ad perfectionem con- tracta, omnia Deum in se referant; ut Deus, qui debet, extet omnia in omnibus. In hoc munus et ofiicium sacerdotis est; in hoc sacrificatio grata Deo est. Quoniam in hoc est coactio et cooperatio in Deo, qui unum in se, pulchrum, et bonum mundum velit esse; et res omnes a malitia, tenebris et morte vindicare; ut tandem absorpta morte vivant in Deo omnia, luculenta ordine et perfecta. In quo labore, per angelos, qui student consecrare mundum Deo, est expurgatio et reconciliatio rerum, et baptismalis illuminatio, et confirmatio in lumine, et denique sua cujusque, quatenus potest capere,1 bonitate impletio et perfectio. Nihil enim aliud. vult omne sacerdotale 1 " Quemadmodum enim ipse sol, diversis rebus subditis apparens, alterum altero plus calefacit; idquo non ob solis, sed eorum qu« solem oxcipiunt, diversitatein ; sic utique divinum donum cum sit per- fectum, pro suscipientium capacitate, vel remittitur vel intenditur." — Pachymerse Paraphrasis in Cosiest. Hicr. c. i. DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESLiE. 45 munus, nisi diversorum purgationem . in unitatem, et tenebricosorum illuminationem in claritatem, et pos- tremo deficientium impletionem in perfectionem ; quae in spiritalibus naturis fiunt simpliciter et aperte, sine consignatione sacramenti, sensibuis. In naturis par tim spiritalibus partim corporeis, cujusmodi sunt homines, eadem fiunt, sed adhibitis etiam symbolis et consignaculis sensibilibus ; ut corpus in eis habeat etiam quod agat puritatem, lumen et bonitatem ipsius. In naturis vero quae non sunt perditae, spiri- tibus aeternis in ipsis, pura, pulchra et bona conditio eorum1 sine ulteriore significatione est earum tem poralis felicitas. Etenim tria sunt genera rerum, sub ipsa rerum omnium causa Deo ; spiritalia penitus 1 sine corporibus temporalibus, et corporea prorsus i sine aeternis spiritibus, et inter haec media ex tern- ; poralibus corporibus et aeternis spiritibus constantia. | In illis primis sacramentum est quodque res ipsa ' sacramenti; in secundis res ipsa sacramentum;2 in mediis his, qui sunt homines, et res est ipsa aliqua-i tenus, et sacramentum quoddam, medium scilicet ex ] spiritali et corporeo compositum, mediae naturae ad-; modum congruum. Haec sunt sacramenta inumanae1 1 Eorum.] Attracted to the gender of spiritibus. 2 " Hie dicendum est, aliquos suscipere sacramentum et rem sacra- ' menti; aliquos sacramentum et non rem; aliquos rem et non sacra mentum." — Petri Lombardi Sentmtice, iv. 4. Though his threefold division comprises only three classes of human beings, the passage will in some measure illustrate what Colet says. As an example of those who receive both the sign and the thing signified {sacramentum et rem), he instances infants at their baptism ; of those who receive the sign but not the reality, unbelievers at the eucharist ; of those who receive the reality but not the sign, martyrs for Christianity, whose \ shedding of blood would be a baptism, though they had never been i baptized before. 46 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. societatis in Christo, ad quae aliquando nostra per- veniat oratio. ». fe f Supra hominem.— Res sacramenti — Invisibiles veritates.— .ffiternitas. < 2 i S. a J ("Spiritali. " " ^Homines ex] Res sacramentata.— Invisibile et sternum a $ j — | [factum quodammodo sensibile et temporale. a § -I I Corporeo. £2. o 1 Is 5" LSub hominem.— Sacramentum rei.— Sensibilia signacula.— Tempua. V. Ex superiore itaque sermone constat, sub pontifice templi (id est, totius mundi), Dei Filio, esse naturas spiritales, purgatas in esse simplex et stabile in Deo, et illustratas onmifaria, sapientia et impletas omni /bonitate; quae purgant, illuminant et'perficiunt pur- t ganda, illuminanda et perficienda in Deo. In qua, purgatione, quae reconciliatio est, multiplex esinhT- nisterium. Unde in eo versati a Dionysio Mjnistri1 vocantur. In quibus potes cogitare in magno mundo, !sed longe meliori nota quam in nobis nostraque ecclesia, Hostiarios, Lectores, Exorcistas, Acolitos, Hypodiaconos.2 Diaconos mihi videtur Dionysius 1 Ministri.] The leitourgoi of Dionysius; who uses hiereus and hierarches for the two higher orders of Sacerdos and Pontifex. — Eccl. Hier. c. vi. Theoria, § 5. 2 Colet names them in an ascending order of dignity, from Ostiarii, or door-keepers, up to Hypodiaconi, or sub-deacons. With respect to the authority for these orders, Bingham writes: — "The two great oracles of the Romish Church, Baronius and the Council of Trent, are very dogmatical and positive in their assertions both about their rise and number; that they are precisely five, viz. Sub-deacons, Acoly- thists, Exorcists, Readers, and Door-keepers ; and that they are all of DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIiE. 47 vocare sacerdotes : et quos nos vocamus sacerdotes et presbiteros, ille pontificeset praesules appellat ; quorum est dominicum corpus conficere, et illuminatos com- plere mysteriis ; sacerdotum dyaconorumque, illumi- nare purgatos; ministrorum primum expurgare; in quibus, ut dixi, hostiarii sunt, qui stant pro foribus templi Dei, excludentes multiplices,1 simplices si- nentes intrare ; item lectores Psalmorum et scripturae sacrae : hi in spiritalibus sunt, qui tacite indicant sine verbo veritatem Dei: exorcistae, qui energuminos obsessosque a malignis spiritibus solvunt et liberant, quod faciunt angelici spiritus adjurationibus nobis incognitis : acoliti, qui ignem et aquam templo ammi- nistrant, quod est factum in mundi templo a cceles- tibus acolitis longe alio et veriori modo : hypodiaconi in sacrario et Dei sanctuario sollicite inserviunt, quod in sanctuario et choro templi mundi fit ineffabiliter. Aquji autem et igne-iavantur purganturque omnia.- Coelestis ignis et^jiqua est amor, et gratia Spiritus sancti. Supra hos purgatorios ordines, in mundi" sacerdotio, potest cogitare, qui se habent illic ut apud nos nostri sacerdotes (ut vocat Dionysius; ut nos appellamus, Diaconi), quorum est purgatos illustrare, ut saltern imagines divinae veritatis videant, eisdemque Apostolical institution." .... But he goes on to show that even i Peter Lombard declared that " the primitive Church had no orders be low those of Presbyters and Deacons." — Antiquities (1710), vol. ii. P. 2. 1 Multiplices.] See the note below, p. 80, on Psalm iv. 10 ; and compare Eccl. Hier. c, iii. § 2. " Post hasc, extra delubrum catechu- meni fiunt, et cum ipsis energumeni, et ii quoque qui in pcenitentia sunt. Manent autem intus soli qui divina spectare merentur atque percipere." 48 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESL33. injiciantur. Hi in ccelesti hierarchia sun£potentes et dominantes virtutes^) quae in media illic hierarchy /locantur ; a quibus est in mundo uluminatio, sicut ab linfima' purgatio. Supra hos cogita summum ponti- ficalem ordinem, sub pontificum pontifice Deo; a quibus sub Deo cuique est perfectionis ministratio. Illi sunt in mundo perfectione complentes omnia, jjsicut nostri apud nos.debent esse pontifices. Nihil | (est his excellentius praeter ipsum Deum! In his con- summatus est numerus ecclesiasticorum ordinum; qui sunt exemplariter in mundi sacerdotio in illis choris angelicis, imaginarie in humana hierarchia. /Apud Moysen eadem erant omnia umbrositer, praeter [haec quae sunt et nominantur episcopi, archiepiscopi, [primates, bfficia, et administrationes. Atque hi quos modo diximus ordines famulatus sunt potius quam ordines. Sed de his apud nos jam statim plura diffu- sius dicemus. Hoc ante omnia teneamus in memoria, jid exemplar Dei omnia esse; quse referant angeli ^ verius, ecclesia nostra imaginarie, ecclesia legalis um- brosfe: omnia pr[ius] esse in ccelo quam in terra: in.: terra quae fiunt, ab imperfecto ad perfectum profi- cisci. Non potuit enim imagoJDei_depingi in terra, in hominibus, nisi, prius g.dumbraretur^1 (In media mundi tabula et hominum quasi carbone infuscavit 1 Adumbraretur.] " Deus, qui dixit de tenebris lucem splendescere, ipse illuxit in cordibus nostris, ad illuininationem scientias claritatis in fecie Jesu Chsis-ti ; ut veriorem jljius vultum fide cernamus : qui reve- lavit quas de se et ecclesiaCaepinxit.Moyses An Christo enim sunt omnia^cumulate) quae vel docere in justitia, vel in religione insti- tuereMoysesillevoluit. Quae fuere prius adumbranda, turn deinde suo tempore illustranda; ut aliquando; inlnne sec'uB perficiantur omnia " —Colet in Ccsl. Hier. (School MS, fol. 4, b). DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESLE. 40 atrum quiddam Moyses; depinxit clarius in toto ! mundo noster Jesus. Primaria idea et exemplar omnium in ccelis est; in quam veritatem ietur1 ali- quando, ut opus a Deo coeptum in terris perficiatur. Quod ut est promotum a Moysaica umbra (ad Chris- tianam imaginem in terris,jita ab hac imagine(ad Chris- tianam veritatem in ccelis) suo tempore promo vebitur. Est enim suum cujusque tempus. Temporis momenta" solus Deus novit. Qui novit tempora adumbrandi et depingendi, idem novit etiam verificandi. Ordo autem, Matrimonium, Reconciliatio, Baptismus, Con- firmatio, Synaxis,2 Extrema Unctio, — et etiam ut haec fiant purgatione, illuminatione et perfectione, in illis quoque ordinibus primis sunt Hostiarii, Lec- tores, Exorcistae, Acoliti, Hypodiaconi, Diaconi, Pres- biteri, tanquam in magno hujus mundi templo, in ccelis. Sed illic, modo ccelesti et vere omnia; hjic in l nobis, qui ad illud exemplar componimur, imaginarie. Quorum imaginum nomina sunt quae modo diximus, et nostrae ecclesiae sacramenta significantia. De f quibus nunc, uti in principio statuimus, liberius vesti- gantes magis aliquid quam diflinientes, diss[eremus]. / 1 Ietur.] Leg. ibitur. So below, p. 64, for pr'ceteribit the MS. has prceteriet. 2 Synaxis.] This is a common term for the Eucharist. Hammond, in his Parcenesis, has a section " On the frequency of Synaxes." Dio nysius says that tqjtthe term communioj which properly belongs to_all, tho Sacraments, is specially applied. "Ac ^riirium quidem illud pie inspicieridum, cujus rei gratia, quod aliis quoque venerandis diviuisque mysteriis commune vocabulum est, huic prae cseteris prascipue ac pecu- liariter applicetur ; ut singulariter communio, sive societas et Synaxis, sive collectio dicatur."— .EccZ. Hier. c. iii. p. i. 50 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIA. VI. Divino erant in mundo angeli scientes, et sponte de- sciscebant a Deo. Hie malum ccepit in creatura pec- f catum; scilicet, inobedientia, superbia, transgressio.J Superbi[entis] 1 a Deo est humiliari, decidique in malum. Sua spohte longe abiit a Deo, qui erat conjunctissimus, Lucifer ille factuosus, secum con- r trahens in suas partes magnam angelorum catervam ; quorum culpa invenialis, et discessus irrevocabilis est, quod scienter et sponte commissus erat. Sciens enim \ spontaneumque peccatum non habet veniam. Est id s. Matt. xii. 32| "contra Spiritum sanctum, quod non remittetur, neque [ inhoc saeculo, neque in futuro." Hie voluntaria n[ocen- tia] in mundo et nequitia est malum et stultitiam et di- visionem mortemque machinans assidue : hie maximse invidiae homini, cujus gloriam vidit fore. Hinc hie author et propagator mali, quern Moyses " serpentem callidiorem vocat cunctis animantibus terrae, quae fecerit Dominus Deus," suasit mulieri falso promisso, ut de illecebroso fructu ligni, quod est in medio pa- radisi, ederet; hoc scitura Dea bonum et malum. Cui mulierculae assensus est vir, jam sciens mali, auscultans malum, audiens sociam mulierem, quae I audivit serpentem " maledictum inter omnia animan- tia [et bestias] terrae, pronum, terram comedentem, perpetuum inimicum mulieris et insidiosum." Hinc humano generi vita aerumnosa, dura, difiicilis, plena miseriae, extra paradisum, longe a ligno vitae. Homo Gen. iii. 1. Gen. iii. 14. , 1 Superbientis.] See below, p. 53 : — '• Quae volens superbire de- cidit a Deo." Hence decidi is probably a mistake for decidere. DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIiE. 51 quia seductus peccavit, quodammodo inscius et in- ' vitus peccavit. Unde non erat ei nihil loci miseri cordiae, quum homing erat aHquid excusationis. In serpentem seductorem rejectum peccatum est. Novit Deus 0£timum tempus miserendi. Erat faciendum ^ ! ut, qui creavit homines, idem recrearet. Creatus erat homo, ut esset conjunx divini Filn^sed sapien tia Dei (de qua exclamat Paulus, "0 altitudo diviti-! Rom. xi. 33,34. arum sapientiae et scientiae Dei : quam incomprehen-i sibilia sunt judicia ejus, et investigabiles viae ejus.( Quis cognovit sensum Domini?") ilia sapientia, ut tanta misericordia adhuc major agnosceretur, sinit hominem delabi; ut non solum creatum ex nihilo, sed etiam recreatum ex malo, ducat uxorem; "ut universa creatura tantam ereatoris benignitatem ob- stupescat et revereatur. Greavit et recreavit sibi suam conjugem humanam Deus : quae bonitatis di- vitiae sunt tantae, ut verba defecerint Paulum, quibus digne rem tantam expromeret ; sed ' divitias et opes *)Ro™-.Ji- 4- misericordiae' appellat. Si ante casum assumpsisseH sibi in uxorem hominem, et propagatio mali, et po- tentia Dei in malo discutiendo, et in mundo maxima Dei sapientia et misericordia non apparuisset. Trans- gressiones et mala declarant aequitatem et bonitatem Dei (ut idem sentit Paulus : " Veritas Dei in men- Rom. m. 7. dacio abundat ") : iniquitas justitiam Dei commendat, in gloriam ipsius. Materia gratiae Dei malum est; ut morbus materia artis medicinae, in gloriam medici. Antequam illud tantum miraculum assumptae humanae naturae in creatura mundi ostentaretur, sivit et per- misit hominem cadere in nihilum, ut ex tanta humi- litate in sublimatione hominis ingentius beneficium et Deo dignius manifestissime cognosceretur. Prae- 52 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIJE. destinatum erat ut homo creatus decideret, seductus ab illo qui decidit non seductus; ut in recreatione rerum in creaturis Dei potentia etiam non minor quam in creatione appareret; misericordia autem multo major quam in creatione, quum multo majus est ex misericordia revocare a malo quam ex misericordia creare a nihilo. Nam quod non est, ut non creetur, non est causa; quod autem malum est, ut non re- creetur, causa est. Magis obstat Deo malum in recreatione, quam non esse in creatione : ut multo majoris potentiae esset recreare mundum a malo, quam creare ex nihilo. In creatione pura potentia; in recreatione pura misericordia; in utraque summa sapientia erat ; per quam Deus et potenter creavit, et misericorditer recreavit : ut in mundo tandem simul cum potentia timenda, inestimabilis misericordia ejusdem amanda sapientissime effulgeret (ut iterum atque iterum inculcat Paulus) in laudem gloriae gra- tiae suae. Ex tanta ergo humilitate in creaturis voluit sibi conjugem accipere altissimus Deus, et in- fimam naturam rationalem, earn quoque in irratio- nalitatem delapsam ; ut suprema ilia natura rationalis, quae invidia decidit, magis in suam miseriam invidia ardeat. Est enim poena perditis gloria salvatorum;1 et in his quanto major est misericordia, tanto illis justitia major est altiorque vindicta. Ut liceat cernere, quam ineffabili modo est Deus simul Justus et misericors ; et simul, quanto magis misericors, eo magis Justus ; ut in misericordia ejus videatur nasci justitia, et esse eadem in Deo misericordia et justitia 1 Salvatorum.] " Virtutem videant, intabescantque relicta." Pers. Sat. iii. 38. DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIiE. 53 in una infinita sapientia. Longa erat declaratio im- becillitatis humanae impotentiaeque resurgendi per se, antequam earn relevavit Deus, ut deserta multo ex- perimento et suam imbecillitatem confiteretur, et divinam misericordiam agnosceret ; utque quae volens superbire decidit a Deo, discat humilitate resurgere et referre omnia Deo. Sine lege delira erat; sub lege deliratior : opportuno tempore in extremo peri- culo succurrit divina misericordia, et pauperculam naturam hominis, obsitam et squalidam, quasi manu [et]1 capite apprehensam ad se traxit; exuit foedam et tabificam vestem; discussit pulverem; extersit sordes ; purgatam induit nitidam et salutarem vestem nuptialem. Idem pontifex et maritus consecravit nuptias; ut, qui angelorum pontifex est, idem sit pontifex hominum, idemque restauret ecclesias qui construxit. In creato homine tantarum nuptiarum sacramentum voluit antecedere etiam ante peccatum, ut sanctius sacramentum esset : ut mirabiliter creatus homo ex nihilo recreati hominis ex malo sit sacra mentum. Adas primo homini in creatione adjecit mulierem ad carnem propagandam ; ut ex hoc primo homini in recreatione intelligatur electa femina ex latere2 ejus recreata, redemptione effusi sanguinis, in spiritum propagandum ; cui dicatur, " Crescite Gen. i. 28. et multiplicamini " spiritali prole, " et replete ter- 1 Et] In the MS. merely the letter "1." — manu apprehensam alone seems, all that is required ; unless we should read manu capiente. 3 Ex latere.] " Nee sine causa et ipsa conjux de latere facta est. Viro dormiente, Eva facta est. Moriente Christo, Ecclesia facta est. Et ilia de latere viri, cum costa detracta est : et ista de latere viri, quando latus lancea percussum est, et sacramenta profluxerunt." — S. Augustinus : Enarratio in Psalmum exxvii. 11. 54 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESLE. ram, et subjicite earn, et dominamini piscibus ma ris et volatilibus coeli, et universis quae moventur super terrain." In paradiso creata femina virago erat recreata in terra, ecclesiae umbra, de qua vatici- Gen. ii. 2-i. natus est Adam, primus propheta, dicens quod " re- linquet homo patrem suum et matrem, et adhaerebit uxori suae; et erunt duo" in spiritu uno. Nam caro Adam significat spiritum Christi. Hoc est sa cramentum quod dicit Paulus in epistola, ad Ephesios, et prae magnitudine (ut Jeronimus scribit)1 non ex- Eph. v. 32. plicat ; sed uno fere verbo dicit quod est " sacramen tum in Christo et ecclesia;" malens tantum myste- rium tacere, quam de eo loqui diminutius. Idcirco Eph. v. 25. admonet Ephesios ut " uxores diligant, sicut Christus ecclesiam," in sanctificationem earum, et fecunda- tionem in spiritu, non in carne. Nam quatenus in conjugio res carnis sit, tanto Veritas spiritus minuitur. Et in paradiso erat maris et feminae connubium sine carnali copula, spiritalis coitus sacramentum. Adam autem, primus homo creatus, et parens carnalis pro- geniei, umbra erat secundi hominis recreati, et pa rentis prolis spiritalis ad numerum stellarum. Erat primus Adam minister Dei in propagatione carnis ad mortem; secundus Adam minister Dei in propaga- * " Gregorius Nazianzenus, vir valde eloquens, et in Scripturis ap- prime erudites, cum de hoc mecum tractaret loco, solebat dicere : vide quantum istius capituli sacramentum sit, ut Apostolus in Christo illud et in Ecolesia interpretans, non se ita asserat, ut testimonii postulabat dignitas, expressisse; sed quodammodo dixerit: Scio quia locus iste ineffabilibus plenus sit sacramentis, et divinum cor quadrat interpretis. Ego autem, pro pusillitate sensus mei, in Christo interim illud et in ecclesia intelligendum puto : non quo aliquid Christo et ecclesia majus sit ; sed quod totum quod de Adam et de Eva dicitur, in Christo et in occlesia interpretari posse difficile sit." — S. Eusebii Hieronymi Com- mentarius in he. (Migne, 1845). DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. 55 tione spiritus ad vitam. Primum Adam vocat Paulus in epistola ad Romanos " formam futuri;" cujus gra- Rom. v. 14. tia in plures abundavit ex multis delictis in justifica- tionem, ut justi conregnent in vita per unum, Jesum Christum, per cujus obedientiam homines justifican- tur. Is erat parens et propagator spiritus ad vitam in terris, sicut primus Adam progenitor carnis ad mortem. Quocirca scribit Paulus ad Corinthios : " Sicut in Adam omnes moriuntur, ita et in Christo 1 Cur. xv. 22, omnes vivificantur. Factus est pr[imus] homo Adam in animam viventem, novissimus Adam in spiritum vivificantem. Primus homo de terra terrenus; se cundus homo de ccelo ccelestis." In Christo ergo non est , prolificatio nisi ccelestis et spiritus. Jam (ait Paulus alibi) " neminem cognovimus secundum 2 Cor. v. 16. carnem." Nee carnalis in Christo debet esse ulla propagatio, sed tota ccelestis, ut " portemus imaginem 1 Cor.xv. 49. ccelestis," et ccelestis parentis nostri similes simus, qui fecundat suam ecclesiam, injecto in earn divino semine, ut copiosam pariat prolem justitiae ad regnum Dei. Qui creavit Adam, ut esset imago sui, voluit ipse quodammodo recreari; ut (sicut ad Colocenses scriptum est) " qui est primogenitus omnis creaturae," Col. i. 15. idem sit " principium, primogenitus ex mortuis," ec- Col. i. is. clesiae caput ; ut sit in omnibus ipse primatum tenens, et creatis et recreatis, et plenis et deficientibus ; qui defecit ipse maxime, ut esset etiam in recreatione et reconciliatione primas, sicuti in creatione et pleni- Tfcudine et perfectione rex erat primas et primogenitus omnis creaturae. " Quoniam in ipso condita sunt Col. i. 16. universa perfecta in ccelis et in terra, visibilia et in- visibilia, sive throni, sive dominationes, sive princi- patus, sive potestates ; omnia per ipsum et in ipso 56 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. creata sunt" mirifice et omnipotenter : deficiente ipso Creatore quodammodo ut creatura reficiatur ;l ut primogenitus creaturae sit idem primoregenitus re- creaturae, in recreata scilicet humana natura quae de- fecit ; ad quam etiam defecit Dei Films ipse et factus est filius hominis, ut refecta natura humana fiat filia Dei et sponsa Filii aeterna. Ut decidit homo in carnem, ita fuit necesse ut exemeretur ex carne com- prehensione spiritus, fiatque ex carne spiritalis ; carne, quse regnavit, a spiritu victa; ut spiritus existens homo idoneus esset ut spiritali connubio cum Deo ipso conjungeretur; cum quo nequaquam conjungi potest nisi sit summe spiritalis. Proportione enim aliqua oportet sint quae copulentur. Caro enim longe distat a Deo, ut carnalem hominem cum Deo conjungi sit impossibile. Hinc Paulus et reliqui apostoli sua- dent et imperant, quoad maxime possunt, mortifica- tionem carnis et revivificationem in spiritu; semper hoc docentes plane, nisi homines fiant spiritus, eos Deo, ut unus fiat spiritus, adhaerere non posse. Rom. vi. 4. " Commortuos et consepultos" dicit Paulos nos esse ib. v. 6. in Christo, in epistola, ad Romanos. " Vetus homo noster simul crucifixus est, ut destruatur corpus pec- cati, ut ultra non serviamus peccato." Est paulo ib. vii. 24. post, "Quis me liberabit a corpore mortis hujus?" 1 Reficiatur.] " How, will some say, can this be? After this manner. The comparison is taken from our first parents. Eve was made of a ribbe taken out of Adams side, he being cast into a slumber : this being done, Adam awaked and saide, TJiis is now bone of my bone, and flesh of my flesh. Christ was nayled on the crosse, and his most pretious blood was shedde, and out of it arise and spring all true Christians ; that is, out of the merit of Christ's death and passion, whereby they become newe creatures." — Perkins, Exposition of the Creech (1597), p. 687. DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. 57 Item, " Sapientia carnis inimica est Deo;" et, " Pru- Rom viii. 7, 6. dentia carnis, mors." " Qui in carne sunt, Deo pla- cere non possunt." " Si Christus in vobis est, corpus lb. w. 10, 13. quidem mortuum est propter peccatum, spiritus vivit propter justificationem. Si spiritu facta carnis mor- tificaveritis, vivetis." Et adhuc postea: "Obsecro lb. xii. 1,2. vos, fratres, per misericordiam Dei, ut exhibeatis corpora vestra hostiam viventem, sanctam, Deo pla- centem, rationabile obsequium. Et nolite conformari huic saeculo, sed reformamini in novitate" spiritus et " sensus vestri; ut probetis quae sit voluntas Dei bona et beneplacens et perfecta." Ad Corinthios: iC0r.ii.14, 15. " Animalis homo non sapit ea quae Dei sunt ; stultitia enim est illi, et non potest intelligere, quia spiritaliter examinatur. Spiritalis autem judicat omnia." Quern dicit animalem hominem, eundem mox postea " car- ib. iii. s. nalem" dicit, et " secundum carnem ambulare." Et in II ad Corinthios: " Semper nos, qui vivimus, in 2Cor. iv. 11. mortem tradimur propter Jesum; ut vita Jesu ma- nifestetur in carne nostra mortali;" et in eodem loco : " Semper mortificationem Jesu Christi in corpore ib. iv 10. circumferentes, ut et vita Jesu manifestetur in corpo ribus nostris." Item, "Unus pro omnibus mortuus 2Cor.v. 14,17. est Christus ; " et in Christo " omnes mortui sunt ; ut, qui vivunt, jam non sibi vivant, sed ei qui pro eis mortuus est et resurrexit. Itaque nos ex hoc nemi- nem novimus secundum carnem. Si qua ergo in Christo nova creatura, vetera transierunt; ecce nova facta sunt omnia." Et illud: "Libenter gloriabor 2 Cor. xii. 9, 10. in infirmitatibus meis, ut inhabitet in me virtus Christi. Quum infirmor, tunc fortior sum." Ad Galathas : " Si hominibus placerem, Christi servus Gai. i. 10. non essem." Item, "Ego per legem legi mortuus Gai. ii. 19, 20. 58 ' DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESLE. sum, ut Deo vivam : Christo crucifixus sum cruci. Vivo jam non ego; vivit vero in me Christus." Et Gal.v. 16, 17. illud: "Spiritu ambulate, et desideria carnis non perficietis. Caro enim concupiscit adversus spiritum ; spiritus adversus carnem: haec enim sibi invicem lb. w. 24, 25. adversantur." Et paulo post: "Qui autem sunt Christi, carnem suam crucifixerunt cum vitiis et con- cupiscentiis. Si vivimus spiritu, spiritu ambulemus." Gai. vi. 14,15. Et post haec : " Mihi absit gloriari, nisi in cruce Do mini nostri Jesu Christi; per quern mihi mundus crucifixus est, et ego mundo." In quo " nihil valet nisi nova creatura." Et ad Ephesios scribens, Deum Eph. i. 3. patrem appellat, " qui benedixit nos in omni benedic- Eph. iv. 22-24, tione spiritali in coelestibus." Et illud : " Deponite vos secundum pristinam conversationem veterem ho minem, qui corrumpitur secundum desideria erroris, et renovamini spiritu mentis vestrae; et induite novum hominem, qui secundum Deum creatus est in justitia et sanctitate veritatis. Et nolite contristare Eph. v. is. Spiritum." Et, " Implemini Spiritu sancto." "Est 4> . vi. 12, n. jjQ-^g colluctatio adversus spiritalia nequitiae in coeles tibus," quae vincenda sunt " armatura Dei." Et ad Phil. i. 21. Philippenses : " Mihi vivere Christus est, et mori lu- Phu. iii. 10-14. crum." Et illud : "Configuratusmorti ejus; si quando ad resurrectionem occurram quae est ex mortuis ; si quomodo comprehendam in quo et comprehensus sum a Christo Jesu. Quae quidem retro sunt obli- viscens, ad ea quae priora sunt extendens me ipsum, ad destinatum prosequor bravium supernae vocationis Col. i. 24. in Christo Jesu." Ad Collocenses: "Nunc gaudeo in passionibus pro vobis, ut impleam ea quae desunt Col. iii. 5. pa,ssionum Christi in carne mea." Item: " Mortifi- cate membra vestra quae sunt supra terrain." Depo- DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESLE. 59 nite et "exspoliate veterem hominem cum actibus Coi. iii. 9,10. suis, et induite novum." Sed quorsum haec testi- monia?" Nempe ut intelligamus, si Deo, qui spiritus est, conjungi et copulari voluerimus, nos necessario mortificata carne spiritales omnino esse oportere, et penitus novos in Christo, ad formam illius hominis in Christo viventes, qui exemplum dedit ut sequamur vestigia ejus ; qui ob id causae solum assumpsit homi nem, ut spiritalem et divinam in homine vitam ostendat hominibus, doceatque quam vestem nup- tialem induat homo, si velit a Deo in uxorem duci. Non locatur matrimonio Deo nisi virgo rejuvenescens spiritu, "sine ruga, sine macula, aut aliquid ejusmodi, Eph. v. 27. tota sancta et immaculata," casta cum sancto, spiritalis et divina cum spiritu et Deo. Cujusmodi puellam Dominus, quando " de coelo prospexit, ut videret si Ps. xiii. 2, 3. esset intelligens aut requirens Deum," sibi in terris nOn invenit; quoniam "omnes declinaverunt, simul inutiles facti sunt: non erat qui fecit bonum, non erat usque ad unum." Fuit igitur necesse sane, ut ^ Deus, creator omnium, quum voluit in terris (miseri cordia quanta excogitari potest a nemine) uxorem ducere, et hominem arctissima copula sibi astring[ere], earn crearet. Creavit primum hominem in utero matris Virginis Mariae ; quern secundum Adam con- junxit sibi, sanctum penitus et sine labe peccati, cujusmodi erat primus Adam antequam cecidit. In illo Dei Filius apparuit hominibus ; ut omnes volentes credere crearet1 ejusmodi, adscisceretque multos, ex peccatoribus factos justos, in societate Filii sui, in 1 Crearet.] If Dei Filius be right, the subject of this verb is changed to Deus ; as shown by Filii sui below. 60 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIA. sanctam sibi conjugem, quae vocatur ecclesia; quam 2 Cor. v. 17. Paulus saepe vocat "in Christo novam creaturam;" ut sacrosanctis nuptiis et divino coitu homo cum Deo (femina homo) in amplexu tanti viri et Dei summe perficiatur, et quae erat sterilis plene fecundetur in illo misericordi concubitu Dei Filii; ut, quasi semine concepto, pariat copiosum fructum in se sanctitatis et justitiae, quae sunt bona opera, quae saepe Paulus vocat fructus in vitam aeternam. Ad Galathas scribit: Gal. v. 22, 23. " Fructus autem spiritus est charitas, gaudium, pax, patientia, longanimitas, bonitas, benignitas, mansue- tudo, fides, modestia, continentia, castitas." Hae virtutes sunt quasi soboles Filii Dei et ecclesiae : opera justitiae quasi filii sunt Dei et suae conjugis ecclesiae. Homines vocantur in ecclesiam in partem uxoris Dei, ut divino semine impregnentur, et, quum antea friguerint, jam caleant, et ex charitate pariant spisse bona opera, et justitiam, quae proles est aeterna Dei et ecclesiae. * ("Dei Filii seterni j ,- Dei filii ', , Christus maritus ¦, Pro]es justi. Deus Pater' ^ Hominis temporalis filise^ Uiaebonorum- ¦ I , iioinims lenjpui ;uis iilki' -, . ^Dese filiies , Ecclesia uxor Dei LHominum confiliarum J que operum. Homines, confratres vel consorores filiae Dei Patris, una conjux est Filii Dei : homini in Christo conso rores sumus, Deitati in Christo conjuges. Illi etam Deitati quasi sorores; quibus nupsit aeternus Dei Filius, ut ecclesia sit ei in communi Patris domo et soror et conjux;1 soror creata a Deo Patre ut earn uxorem ducat Filius, earn fecundans justitia in aeter- 1 Et soror et conjux.] Thus was fulfilled and spiritualized the legend of the ancients concerning the children of Saturn. See the passages quoted at § ii. of Fulgcntius's Mythologies (1681), p. 36. DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. 61 nitatem. Itaque ecclesia homini in Christo consoror est : Deo Filio in Christo et soror et conjux : Deo Patri filia virago. Sed filia Dei virilior est viris filiis hominum. Deus Pater genuit sibi aeterna generatione coaeternum Filium : genuit quidem in se, et ex se ipso, et quasi coit in se ipso, ut Filium progignat in se ipso ; ut illo ineffabili modo esset simul [Pater] et Mater. Genitus autem Filius ille aeternus, Dei Patris virtus et sapientia, quum coeperit amare, non potuit esse cui non tradatur uxor. Nam ex amore implere, perficere, et in alio et cum alio propagare imaginem et similitudinem suam,— tanta virtus abesse divinis et divino Filio non potest. Hoc est matrimonium; conjunctio maris et feminae : quae, si bona est, debet esse prima in primo, ut a primo deinceps quae sunt nominentur. Dei Filius ergo primus maritus est, a quo omnis maritatio in coelo et in terra nominatur. Est vir ipse, et ipsa masculinitas, feminae creaturae perfectio. Quanquam illi destinata erat conjux, tamen non statim ei data fuit. " Primogenitus omnis creaturae," ut vocat Paulus in epistola ad Collocenses, "In quocondita sunt universa in coelis et in terra, visi- Col. i. 15, 16. bilia et invisibilia, sive throni, sive dominationes, sive principatus, sive potestates; omnia per ipsum et in ipso creata sunt :" — ille primogenitus creaturae et imago invisibilis Dei, creaturam ad imaginem Dei conditam, id est, hominem creatum, illico duxisset uxorem, si puella haec lasciva in paradiso non violata fuisset. Qua ob id causae repudiate, mansit viduus vir ille Filius Dei, donee Pater genuerat sibi filiam incorruptam, quam Filio suo nubendam tradat ; quam quum voluit ex corrupta carne et adulterata ilia in paradiso progignere, ut opus Dei ordine procedat, magno opus erat praeparamento, magno etiam et 62 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. vario rerum successu. Ante omnia vero opus erat, ut tanta res futura digno et congruo Sacramento significaretur. Est semper intelligendum, sensibi- lia et carnalia in hominibus intelligibilium et spiri- tualium esse sacramenta.1 Quum provisum erat Adam casurum, cui erat adjecta femina, ut ex eo carnali fluat progenies, simul praedestinata erat ex coelo virtus processura, quae comprehendens homi nem serperet spiritificans in interitum carnis; quae esset alia propago et secunda, cui prima ilia propago ut umbra praecessit, et potentibus intelligere ut sa cramentum. Voluit ergo Deus in corrupto homine depingere earn veritatem, quae incorrupto homine evenit suo tempore. Usus est corruptela mundi pro materia significationis. Veritas significata ex coelo tandem contrario cursu se influit in mundum, lapis 1 Pet. ii. 8. objectus fluctibus, " lapis offensionis et petra scan- dali," ad quern delabens mundus se frangit, qui est mundo omnino contrarius, et ccelestis fluvius, mun- ps. xiv. 5. dano omnino objectus; "fluvius ille impetuosus, qui laetificat civitatem Dei." Haec est restauratio mundi per vim revelantem. Mundo bene creato et condito, Gen. i. 31. (" Vidit Deus," inquit, " cuncta quae fecerat, et erant valde bona") ruinae cceperunt esse, quas reparaturus erat Deus per Filium suum, et reaedificaturus mun dum, ac quasi novum mundum facturus ; ut nuptiae, gloria, regnUm sit Filio suo, qui erat apud Patrem Gon. ii. is. antiquus Adam. Sed " non est bonum hominem 1 Sacramenta.] Eccl. Hier. c. ii. p. iii. " Sunt enim (ut Libro de Intelligibilibus et Sensibilibus aperte docuimus) visibilia sacramenta intelligibilium imagines qusedam ; quibus ad ea recto itinere ducimur. Porro intelligibilia visibilium sacramentorum initium sunt atque scientia." DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. 63 esse solum. Dixit ergo Dominus Deus, Faciamus ei adjutorium simile sibi." Hinc Paulus vocat eccle- siam coadjutorem Dei in propagatione justitiae : pro les enim Filii Dei et ecclesiae conjugis justitia est. Adam ille antiquus nominavit omnia proprio nomine ; quo verbo erant creata omnia. At huic Filio Dei non erat reperta uxor, quam impleret semine divino in propagationem justitiae. " Adae non inveniebatur Gen. ii. 20. adjutor similis ejus." Voluit Deus Adam in sopore esse in humana carne, ex ejus latere viraginem [sumpturus],1 propter quam relinquet Filius Dei Patrem suum et Matrem, et adhaerebit uxori suae, et erunt duo in spiritu uno. Sed ut serpens Evam, ita serpens est qui seducit ecclesiam. Quapropter Paulus ad Corinthios, " Timeo," inquit, " ne, sicut serpens 2 Cor. xi. 3. feminam seduxit astutia, sua,, ita corrumpantur sensus vestri, et excidant a simplicitate quae est in Christo ;" qui assumpsit sibi ecclesiam in uxorem, ut non edat de ligno scientiae boni et mali, sed adhaereat illi sim- plici fide, a qua si cadat in ratiocinationem boni et mali, turn cadit a fide et Christo. " Despondi vos 2 Cor. xi. 2. uni viro" (Filio Dei), " virginem castam" (simplici tate fidei) " exhibere Christo;" qui reliquit patrem et matrem (id est, Deum qui ilium genuit ex seipso, ut esset et Pater et Mater) ut adhaereret uxori suae ecclesiae; quam, sanguine ex latere effuso et morte Christi redemptam, Pater sibi adoptavit in filiam, ut ei nubat Filius suus. Ad Romanos : " Vos mor- Rom. vii. 4. tificati estis legi per corpus Christi, ut sitis alterius" (id est, Filii Dei una cum homine assumpto illo) 1 Sumpturus.] " Haec vocabitur virago, quoniam de viro sumpta est."— Gen. ii. 23. 64 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIJE. " qui resurrexit a- mortuis," ut vos novi cum illo homine, et conjux Christi, " fructificetis Deo." Hie fructus justitiae est masculina virtus, et fihus Dei et ecclesiae. Vos enim estis membra de membro, id est, homines adhaerentes homini illi primo, ut una cum illo sitis in uxore Dei, uniti et adhaerentes illi, quam uxorem humanam vocat Paulus, facturam et creaturam ex nequitia hujus mundi. Cujus rei et matrimonii, conjunctionisque feminei hominis cum masculino Deo, sacramentum dicit in epistola ad Ephesios magnum illud sanxitum matrimonium Adae et Evae fuisse, qui primi erant homines;1 et in illis primum sacramentum et prima prophetia ; quod illud et carnalia omnia in alio progressu spiritali, incepto a Christo, perfici debent spiritaliter, in finitionem s. Matth. v. is. eorum quae sunt carnis. " Iota," dixit ille secundus Adam, " et apex unus non praeteribit de lege, donee omnia fiant." Adam divinum Filium, Eva ecclesiam significat : matrimonium inter Adam et Evam, matri monium sanctum inter Dei Filium et ecclesiam, in fecunditatem justitiae, quae proles est Dei et ecclesiae. Propagatio ilia carnalis ad mortem; haec per Chris tum propagatio justitiae ad vitam. Haec omnia sunt signa et sacramenta novi mundi in Christo, ut nee 1 Compare the Paraphrase of Erasmus on Eph. v. ad f. " Subest hie ineffabile quoddam et ingens arcanum, quomodo quod in Adam et Eva sub typo gestum est, in Christo et in ecclesia mystice peragatur. Hujus individuam copulam quisquis scrutabitur, intelliget magnum subesse mysterium. Nam quemadmodum ipse cum Patre unum erat, ita et suos omnes unum voluit esse secum. Quod arcanum licet re- trusius sit quam ut in pra^sentia sit explicandum, tamen in hoc sat est attulisse exemplum, ut suam quisque uxorem non secus diligat atque se ipsum diligit ; memineritque, secum illam unum et idem esse, quem admodum Christus adamavit ecclesiam suam, quam sibi intime ad- junxit." DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIiE. 65 iota nee apex praetereat donee omnia fiant. Post- quam ceciderit homo quam longissime a Deo in ni hilum, in paranda Mc conjuge multum erat laboris et negotii. Ut Dei opus ordine procederet, summa et serenior pars humani erat reservata, et ea quoque in humano genere ordine fluens, donee tandem [p]u- rissima virgo, flos ex radice Jesse, fructificaverit Jesum, masculum et feminam, in quo erat masculus Deus et femineus homo. Id est quod Moyses ait : " Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem Gen. i. 26, 27. nostram; et praesit piscibus maris, et volatilibus coeli, et bestiis, universae[que] terrae, omnique reptili quod movetur in terra. Et creavit Deus hominem ad imaginem suam ; ad imaginem Dei creavit ilium ; mas culum et feminam creavit eos." Hie est Jesus, mascu- linus Deo, et femininus humanitate, per quam attraxit sibi reliquos homines in completionem conjugis suae, ut incrementum et multiplicatio sit, et repletio, et subjectio terrae per justitiam. Hie est quern Paulus vocat " principium, primogenitus " (id est, primore- Coi. i. is. genitus), " ut sit ipse in omnibus primatum tenens." In quo est factura rerum, et refactura inchoata ab homine, quae conjux assumpta est per caput, qui est homo, a Maria virgine sumptus; cui sunt reliqui vocati homines membra ex membro, ex quibus om nibus constat una ecclesia, cujus maritus est Dei Fi lius. Quae ecclesia ut effingeretur apta ad nuptias, antecessit Moysaica lex: immo illic, ut in brevi tabul&, quae est futura ecclesia in mundo significatur a Patre facto capite ecclesiae; et, data Filio suo in manum, agit idem Pater in completionem uxoris Filii sui. Nemo venit nisi Pater traxerit in conju- gium : simul Filius fecundat in frugem justitiae verae 66 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. et simplicis, turn in Deum tum in homines. Itaque aeterno genito Filio, Pater in terris genuit filiam ecclesiam, et eam locavit matrimonio Filio suo. Hinc Filius Dei apud Marcum se sponsum vocavit ; dicens, s. Mari?,ii. 19, « Numquid filii nuptiarum, quamdiu sponsus cum illis est, possunt jejunare? Quanto tempore habent secum sponsum, non possunt jejunare. Veniet autem tempus quum auferetur ab eis sponsus ; et tunc jeju- nabunt illis diebus." De his nuptiis est ilia parabola s. Matth. xxu. apud Matthaeum, " Hominem regem " (id est, Deum Patrem) " fecisse nuptias Filio suo; vocasse quam plurimos, sed illos indignos non venisse; vocatos multos, paucos venisse." Primum ergo quod est in ecclesia nostra est pontifici nostro Veritas nuptiarum ; in qua quia non est significatio, sed ipsa Veritas, ideo puto Dionysium in Ecclesiasticd Hierarchia de matri monio tacuisse, cujus sacramentum antecessit. Hinc inter Deum et ecclesiam verae sunt nuptiae, etfeminei hominis cum masculino Deo fecundissima conjunctio ; ad quam omnia sacramenta in ecclesia tendunt; ut homines parentur, et in illis Sanctis nuptiis continean- tur sacramentis purgatoriis, illuminatoriis et perfec- toriis. Homo in Dei Filium assumptus purissimus, illuminatissimus, et perfectissimus erat, et vera Dei uxor. Is sacerdotium instituit apostolos; qui pceni tentia, baptismo, confirmatione, eucharistia, extrema unctione, expurgent, illuminent, perficiant, et talibus sacramentis consignent homines in uxorem Christi et Dei. Consecravit primum sibi sacerdotes, ad exem- plum angelorum, pontifex ille et sponsus; qui sunt primi in sponsa Dei, et quasi mulieris anima; ut re- liquum sponsae corpus confidant purgatum, illumina- tum, et perfectum, ac ejusmodi dignis sacramentis DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESLE. 67 Unum «3CD3 a K P o o o a 3 o 3' o 3" i >-*so* o O 3 tr B* 2. 2. >< CD QD ^+- trt- 5' O 2. a^ O - *-i Co O CD c CO c+ Pi CD *13 la 3 cb" 3. CO oo o f •fl E. a> •3 c Se es >3 oi Sacrum conjugium. 68 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCEESUE. consignent, ut sensibili sigillo et impressione spirit- alem impressionem agnoscant. Dei Filius, pontifex noster, vir, et sponsus, purgator idem et illuminator et perfector, sanxivit nuptias inter se et sororem suam adoptatam in domum Patris sui : instituit sub se filios et pontifices, qui reliquam conjugem conse- crent Deo. Quae quia corporea et caduca est, cor poreis ' sacramentis, tanquam retinaculis quibusdam, colligant; pcenitentia, baptismo, confirmatione, eu charistia, et extrema unctione. Omnia ad haec ten- dunt, ut compleatur conjux, et nuptiae Christi. Sacerdotes sunt mariti in marito et sacerdote Jesu ; et in illo purgantes pcenitentia, illuminantes bap tismo et confirmatione, et perficientes eucharistia et Matrimonium.Ordo Sacerdotii. Pcenitentia. Baptismus. Confirmatio.Eucharistia. Extrema Unctio. extrema unctione. Quid est tota ecclesia nisi matrimonium illud spiritale, vir et uxor, ordinati etiam et qui ordinentur, purga- tione, illuminatione et perfec- tione, ut sordes, tenebrae et de- fectus carnis tollatur a secundo Adam ? Pontifex et sponsus se propagat, et in illo omnes pontifices sunt sponsi, et agunt in illo pontifi- cale munus, et parationem uxoris, et fecundationem divino semine, et verbo Dei, ut eo fecunda ecclesia parens et mater sit justitiae. Ordo ergo primum est in ecclesia; pontifex enim ipse Christus; et in illo ' Corporeis sacr.] " Primis et summis hominibus apertiores sunt visiones, ac in mentes eorum irradiatio simplicior deitatis. Eeliquis deinde crassioribus per signa commode indicantur omnia; et morum effictio, et Dei excultio, et veritatis expectatio."— Colet, in Cal. Hier. (School MS., fol. 6, a). 02 CO^ f Vir, Deus, o a O 3 _, « 0 1 P5 O<)02 Hft r Vir, sacerdos. "1 Proles, Chriatianitas. , , I Vir, Anima. i Proles, Humanitas. . Femma, ecclesia. ¦! f l Femina, populus. i Femina, Corpus. " Vir, Forma Corporis.- Femina, Materia. LProles, tertium compositum. Omnia hsBC unus est 1 . Jesus I Christus. 70 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. delude simul matrimonium, et in illo pontifices et sponsi agentes pontificatum et sponsionem Christi, ut spiritales nuptias propagent, omniaque contrahant ordine in conjugem Christi, et in eodem contineantur. Ipsa Veritas pontificis est Dei Filius, qui et ange- lorum est idem quoque Veritas sponsi. Superior ecclesiae pars in ratione pontificis et sponsi ilium imitatur, ut in pontifice et sponso Deo pontificem et sponsum agat, et sacrificet, prolemque progignat. In qua actione quia idem est sponsus et pontifex, idcirco idem est proles et sacrificium, quae [justitia] est, quae sacrificatur a pontifice et progignitur a sponso. In qua re idem est sacrificatio et progene- ratio. Ut enim idem est sacrificans et generans (id est, pontifex et sponsus in summo pontifice et sponso Deo Christo), ita eadem est actio, sacrificatio etproli- ficatio ; et eadem oblatio et proles, quae est justitia ; quam ecclesia, sanctificata et fecundata a Deo Filio, et offert et parit prolem et sacrificium. In persona Ps. iv. 6, 7. ecclesiae, David in Psalmo quarto jubet, " Sacrificate sacrificium justitiae, et sperate in Domino: multi dicunt, Quis ostendit nobis bona? Signatum est super nos lumen vultus tui, Domine." In quo anno- tandum est breviter ibi a propheta, tactas esse illas tres virtutes celeberrimas, spem, fidem et caritatem. ib. iv. 10. Jubet enim speremus, qui " sumus constituti in spe singulariter," id est simpliciter, et " sumus signati lumine" fidei, quod est signum vultus et veritatis Dei: et "Sacrificate sacrificium justitiae," quod idem sacrificium est et proles Dei et ecclesiae. Quid enim aliud est sacrificare quam parere, et procreare ex semine et fecunditate Dei vivas et pingues hostias vitali sanguine plenas? Et id quoque quidnam aliud DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. 71 est quam juste agere, offerreque justitiam Domino illi justitiae justificanti, et fecunditatis Domino fecun- danti; ut idem sit pontifex Justus justificans, et sponsus fecundus fecundans ecclesiam sponsam, quae est gens sancta et sacerdotalis sacrificans, et eadem mater fecunda verbo et semine Dei pariens, justitiam, sacrificium et prolem Deo Filio, parenti genitorique justitiae in sua, uxore ecclesia. Paulus autem, agens in Jesu vero pontifice et sponso, personam pontificis et sponsi, saepe in suis epistolis, in quibus se vocat " dispensatorem mysteriorum Dei," et coadjutorem quatenus ad pontificatus officium attinet, scribit in epistola ad Romanos hisce verbis: "Audacius autem Rom.xv.i5,i6. scripsi vobis, fratres, ex parte, tanquam in memoriam vobis reducens, propter gratiam quae data est mihi a Deo " (in quo ago ministerium), " ut sim minister Jesu Christi in gentibus, sanctificans evangelium Dei, ut fiat oblatio gentium accepta" (id est, justitia in eis) " et sanctificata in Spiritu Sancto;" inobedi entia scilicet Deo. Et ad eosdem Romanos, quos velit gentem esse sanctam et sacerdotalem, (nam est sacerdotis sacerdotium propagare : nihil enim est munus et officium cuj usque, nisi propagatio ejusdem, et qui se sacrificavit Deo efficere ut secum alii consa- crificent, ut tota ecclesia sit sacerdotium consacri- ficans justitiam, id est, quisque in ea se justum, vivam hostiam, offerat Deo) scribit : " Obsecro itaque R°m. xii. i, 2. vos, fratres, per misericordiam Dei, ut exhibeatis corpora vestra hostiam viventem, sanctam, Deo placentem, rationale obsequium vestrum. Et nolite conformari huic saeculo ; sed reformamini in novitate spiritus vestri; ut probetis quae sit voluntas Dei bona, beneplacens et perfecta." Hic ecclesia inferior 72 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. superiorem ecclesiam imitatur, et sacrificans se illam sacrificantem se Deo contendit referre. Quia nihil est aliud officium in ecclesia, quam sacrificatio sui cu- jusque Deo; et id quoque nihil est aliud quam se filium Dei facere. Sacrificare est ergo facere filium summo pontifici et sponso. Et ecclesia est sacerdos et mater; justitia est 'sacrificium et proles. Mascu- linior pars cum femininiori agit assidue, ut a tota simul sacrificium et proles offeratur. Offert masculinior ut gignens, femininior ut mater et parens. Tota res Gai. iv. 19. una est et simplex, et quasi arbor fructificans. " Fi- lioli mei," inquit ad Galathas Paulus, " quos iterum parturio, donee formetur in vobis Christus." Ibi Christum sponsum imitatur, cujus est in conjuge for- mare filios justitiae, facereque ut conjux sacerdos offerat filios Deo, justa sacrificia justitiae. Est enim ecclesia soror Christi, et mater et sacerdos justitiae ; sponsa et sacerdos pati ns non agens. Sunt enim sacrificantes agentes, et sacrificantes patientes. Una sacrificat agens, et [una] l pars patiens in ecclesia. Et 1 Peter a 9; 2, tota ecclesia, ut Petrus scribit, "genus electum, 3,4. ' , • • regale sacerdotium, gens sancta, populus acquisi tions " est simul ; " ut modo geniti infantes, ut cres- camus in salutem," in similitudinem Domini; "ad quern accedentes, lapidem vivum, electum, ipsi lapides vivi superaedificemur, domus spiritalis, sacer dotium sanctum, offerentes spiritales hostias, accep- tabiles Deo per Jesum Christum. Haec hostia est suum cuj usque in se sacrificium justitiae Deo in Christo, quae etiam justitia est filia Dei in nobis genita, verbo Dei audito et credito, et nobis edita. 1 Una.] There is no blank in the MS, but the word seems to be required. DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESLE. 73 VII. Hue ergo ventum est tandem vago hoc sermone, ut habeamus matrimonium et sacerdotium in Christo omnino esse idem, et eandem actionem effectumque habere; sacrificareque esse idem quod gignere, et prolem idem quod sacrificium, quae justitia est : hanc rem, matrimonialeque sacerdotium, et sacerdotale matrimonium, venisse et derivatum esse in homines ab ipso sacerdote et sponso Jesu Christo. In quo, ad imitationem ipsius, deinceps in reliqua ecclesia pro- cedet simul et idem sacerdotium et matrimonium sanctum, sanctificans sanctam ecclesiam Deo ; ut to- tum officium superioris et masculiiiioris partis in eccle sia sit studere in sanctificationem inferioris ; inferioris autem obedire in omnibus, ut sanctificetur. Id est quod Paulus latenter suadet in Epistola ad Ephesios, quum viri et mulieris officium docet : mulieris sci- Eph. v. 22, sq. licet officium obedire in omnibus viro in sanctifica tionem s[uam] ab illo in Domino; viri autem (qui ¦ caput est mulieris, sicut ecclesiae Christus) diligere uxorem, et ad exemplum Christi seipsum tradere pro ea, sanctificans eam et mundans lavacro aquae gratiae in Verbo Vitae; ut exhiberet ipse sibi gloriosam uxorem, non habentem maculam, neque rugam, aut aliquid ejusmodi, sed sanctam et immaculatam. Nam in Christo sponsum esse, est ilium imitari, et sancti ficationem corporis sui agere, id est mulieris, in aeter- nitatem; sicut in prima, generatione mulier egit corruptionem capitis sui viri in mortalitatem: item fecundare adhaerentem sibi conjugem, et implere justitia; ut, " sicut exhibuimus membra nostra servire Rom. vi. 19. immunditiae, et iniquitati ad iniquitatem, ita nunc 74. DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIiE. exhibeamus membra nostra servire justitiae in sancti- ficationem." Jesus enim, castus sponsus, propagator spiritus, extat nobis exemplum. Omnis actio in ecclesia debet esse imitatio illius, ut non sit in ea quicquam, nisi quod ipsum est in illo verius; nee debet esse in ecclesia nisi quod ab illius veritate derivetur. Ille maritus est ecclesiae in sanctifica- tionem ejus ; qui, caput illius, se ipsum tradidit pro ea, ut illam sanctificet et impleat fetu justititae. In hunc finem debet esse quisque maritus in ecclesia in Domino, in sanctificationem uxoris suae et castum conjugium; ut, sicut ab Adam1 peccatore profluxit carnalis generatio in mortem, ita ab Adam justo pro- fluat spiritalis generatio in vitam aeternam. Carnalis autem generatio, tametsi mollitudini hominum in prima epistola ad Corinthios ab apostolo indulgetur, necessitate magis quam voluntate, tamen ipsa non est res Christi : nee ea nee ejus prolificatio in Christiani- tate requiritur2 necessario, tametsi necessario mol- 1 Ab Adam.] "Adam must be considered not as a private man, but as a roote or head, bearing in it all mankind; or as a publike per son representing all his posteritie ; and therefore, when he sinned, all his posteritie sinned with him : as in a parliment, whatsoever is done by the burgesse for the shiere, is done by every person in the shiere." — Perkins, Exposition of the Creede (1597), p. 154. 2 Requiritur.] Compare with this strong opinion what Sir Thomas More writes in his Utopia (tr. by Eobinson, 1624, p. 125) : — " They be divided into two sects : the one, of them that live single and chaste, abstaining not only from the company of women, but also from eating of flesh, and some of them from all maner of beasts. Which, utterly rejecting the pleasures of this present life as hurtful], be all wholly set upon the desire of the life to come The other sect is no lesse desirovft of Labour, but they embrace Matrimonie, not despising the solace thereof, thinking that they cannot be discharged of their bounden duties towards nature, without labour and toile. nor towards their native countioy, without procreation of childicn. They abstaine DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESLE. 75 libus et infirmis permittitur. Est enim ilia res hominis creati in damnationem, non recreati ho minis in Christo in salutem. Ratio enim sacra menta. in eo, modo adsit Veritas ipsa matrimonii, evanescat et abeat necesse est. Materiam regene- rationis satis suppeditasset paganitas, si in ea parte ecclesia omnino sterilis fuisset. Nee erat timen- dum ne tota paganitas Christianizet, quum nunc quoque sub ipso nomine Christianitatis maxima pars hominum paganizet. Veritas sincera semper rara est, et in paucis. Et perrexisset generatio carnalis in filiis hominum, et simul ex iisdem generatio spiritalis a filiis Dei. De qua re consulentibus Corinthiis in Epistola respondit Paulus : Incontinentibus, vitandae rEp.Cor. vii. fornicationis causa, ex indulgentiis licere eis uxores suas tenere, si habent ; si non habeant, ducere, et in matrimonio rem mutuo reddere, quando libidinis ! ardor et necessitas urget. Verum haec invitus per- fmittit, qui voluit omnes esse sicut ipse erat, virgo; et i~ uadet, quatenus per infirmitatem impotentiamque continendi licet, disjugatis, tum viduis tum virginibus, soluti et liberi maneant Deo. Beatiores eos dicit, si sic permanserint, quia virgines et viduae quietius et simplicius vacabunt Deo, vero marito suo. Verum in omnibus non est sanitas quidem, et aegrotis indul- gendum est ex ecclesiae misericordia. " Unusquisque ib. vii. 7. from no pleasure that doth nothing hinder them from labour. They love i the flesh of foure-footed beasts, because they beleeve that by the meat they be made hardie and stronger to worke. The Utopians count this sect the wiser, but the other the holyer. Which in that they preferre [ single life before matrimony, and that sharpe life before the easier life, i if herein they grounded upon reason, they would mocke them : But now 'forasmuch as they say they be led to it by religion, they honour and worship them." 76 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. proprium donum habet; ahus quidem sic, alius vero sic." In tanta infirmitate non audet Paulus la- queum injicere optimis, necnon indulgere aliquatenus deteriori. Quod facit ea lege, ut homines ea licentia utantur. Siquidem qui velint potius sani esse, et tales ut indulgentia nihilo egeant, alioquin sponte videntur aegrotare et insanire; quod est in ecclesia Christiana detestabile, ut aliquis scilicet sponte lan- gueat mulieretque, quum sumus vocati in virilem dignitatem, non ut turpe aliquid et carnale mulie- briter agamus. At imbecillioribus, et non valentibus agere quod melius est, ipsum tametsi malum est, tamen aegroto non est malum ; modo medicina indulta utatur non amplius quam suus morbus exposcat. Quum videt omnes in ecclesia ad exemplum Christi coelibes esse oportere, tamen simul vidit omnes non posse. Quapropter, ut velit potentes coelibes vivere, ita impotentes permisit refrigerio sui ardoris uti. Op- tandum est tamen ut tota Christianitas esset in ccelibatu; quod optavit ipse Paulus, quando dixit, 1 Cor. vii. 7. " Vellem vos omnes esse sicut ego sum ; " quoniam sancta ecclesia Christi, tota spiritalis, non requirit nisi matrimonium spiritale et spiritalem prolifica- tionem in marito nostro Jesu Christo ; in quo carnales homines sunt facti spiritales, ut propagationem non agant nunc, nisi angelorum more, ad exemplum Christi, spiritalem justitiae. In superiore parte ecclesiae in Christo est ordo, et matrimonium, ut ita dicam, masculinum, quod voca- tur sacerdotium, quod ipsum est etiam sponsus in sponso, quod partitur in varios ordines. Sunt Pres- byteri, quos Dionysius vocat Pontifices.1 Sunt etiam 1 See above, p. 47. DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. 77 quos ille vocat Ministros ; in quibus sunt Subdiaconi, Acoliti, Exorcistae, Lectores, Hostiarii; qui omnes exercitantur -in purgatione, sicut Sacerdotes Diaco- nique in illuminatione, et postremo sicut illi Ponti fices in perfectione et consummatione. Nam totum officium viri est in purgatorum illuminatione, fide, et perfectione eorundem caritate. Purgatio tendit in simplicitatem et constantiam spei. In Psalmo quarto est, " Constituisti me singulariter in spe." v. 10. Illuminatio effectum suum habet fidem, ut " in lu- ps. xxxv. 10. mine Dei videamus lumen," et in aenigmate veritatem, et in imagine vultum. Quod lumen fidei, ut in illo eodem Psalmo testatur David, " signatum est super iv. 7. nos," et est imago vultus Dei et veritatis. Perfec- tionis autem finis est sacrificium justitiae ex caritate. Haec molitur superior pars ecclesiae, et una cum eadem obedit et patitur inferior pars matrimonii et sacerdos feminea, ut pariat et sacrificet filios justitiae Deo. De ordine loquitur Dionysius, de matrimonio tacet ; vel intelligens sacerdotium matrimonium esse, vel in sua taciturnitate nos docens non aliud in ec clesia Christi matrimonium esse oportere, quam sacer dotium; carnale matrimonium, quod erat spiritalis sacramentum, modo coruscante veritate discussum esse et abiisse. Antecessit illud olim in primordio humani generis, et in paradiso coepit Divinae conjunc- tionis et humanae symbolum ;l Christi, aeterni sponsi, et ecclesiae conjugii signum et sacramentum. Quae quidem ecclesia virago in somno illo in vivifica carne 1 " Cum alia sacramenta post peccatum, et propter peccatum exor dium sumpserint, matrimonii sacramentum etiam ante peccatum legitur institutum a Domino : non tamen ad remedium, sed ad officium." — Petr. Lomb. Sentent. iv. 26. 78 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESL3E. ex illius costa et latere formata erat mulier Dei, unde sanguis redemptionis sponsae et aqua ablutionis Eph. v. 26,27. ejus in omni sanctificatione effluxit, " ut-illam sancti- ficaret, mundans eam lavacro aquae in Verbo Vitae in seipso, ut exhiberet ipse sibi gloriosam ecclesiam, non habentem maculam neque rugam nee aliquid ejusmodi, sed sanctam et immaculatam ;" ut tota sancta adhaereat sancto illi Deo quern vivificavit Dominus, ut in illo cum illo mirabiliter evadat unus Eph. v. 32. spiritus. Testatur in Epistola ad Ephesios Paulus, viraginem illam sumptam de latere viri, — carnem ex carne et os ex ossibus illius, propter quam " relinquet homo patrem et matrem, et adhaerebit uxori suae," — "magnum esse sacramentum in Christo et ecclesia;" in qua nemo conjugatur conj unctione significante, sed significata; non carnali sed spiritali; non Sacra mento sed veritate ; omnes ad imitationem Christi in omnibus; ut quisque diligat uxorem sicut Christus ecclesiam, in uxoris sanctificationem in veritate. Matrimonium et sacerdotium idem est; et in supe- riore parte ecclesiae ac masculina ejus officium est purgare, illuminare, et perficere; ut tota ecclesia pariat et sacrificet prolem justitiae Deo. At haec de Ordine et Matrimonio sufficiant. VIII. Uti modo diffuso sermone ostendimus, superior ec clesiae pars in Christo, masculinior et activior, sacerdos est et sponsus, pater et genitor justitiae in inferiore parte ecclesiae, quae est femininior et magis passiva, et quasi sponsa ac mater, in qua justitia formari de- DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. 79 beat. Justitia autem est fides Deo per Christum, et caritas Dei et proximi. Haec ex Deo ipso est homini bus electis ; illis quos Deus irradiat, ut fide respiciant ilium et reament, et ex fide hominibus bene agant. Radius Dei et lucet et calet suavissime. Hic in Deo vera bonitas est, et bona Veritas; in hominis anima idem radius est fidelis amor Deo et amans fides. Sed ut nihil possit lucere et calere nisi prius sit, — est autem quodque simplicitate et veritate, nam divisio et multiplicitas mors est — ut aliquid ergo illuminetur fide, et concaleat amore Dei et proximi, oportet illud recreetur prius, quasi ex nihilo, et a multiplicitate pulvereque ad simplicitatem, a divisione morteque ad veritatem etjvitam contrahatur, ut sit in tali esse et puncto ut Divino radio attingi possit, illuminarique et perfici in summo sole Deo, qui est in Jesu Christo. Est enim in homine quod suum est proprium, indi- viduum et simplex; quod mala et multiplici ratione obductum et involutum vacillat secum, et titubat; qua externa conditione oportet spolietur homo om nino, et expurgetur illud intimum individuum, ut in se redeat, et extet nudum, purum et simplex; ac nunc, subtractis omnibus impedimentis, et abrepto omni onere quod deorsum detrusit, solutum et libe- rum in se intime et summe constet; abductum jam ab omni divisa et multiplici conditione, et expositum Deo alte in ratione simplici et individua, et in se penitus nuditer et aperte; ut, tale apparens in Deo, in Deo summo sole statim attactus1 Divino radio illuminetur et calefiat. Hoc individuum in homine Paulus vocat " hominem interiorem :" Salvator in Eph. in. ie. 1 Attactus.] Sc. homo. 80 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESL/E. Matth. vi. 22. evangelio " hominis oculum;" qui " si simplex fuerit, totum corpus lucidum erit." Simplicitas hujus indi- vidui hominis, et animae unitas, et esse in Deo per Christum, est spes, quae est ilia nuda et simplex ex- positio et apparitio humanae animae Deo, omni quasi appendice abstracto, ut levis et libera nunc anima secum constet in se intime, et in Deo, stabiliter con- juncta uni et unifico Deo, et ab illo solo dependens et ab eodem cert[e] expectans omnia. Quae sperans expectatio est animae suum esse spiritale, potentia, firmitas, et constantia, purgationis finis, Christiani hominis initium, qua imprimis quisque Christianus et tota ecclesia quasi fixa et stabilita est in puncto, essentia spiritali, ut deinde altius in lumen et perfectionem sui promoveatur. De ecclesia inquit v. 10. David in Psalmo quarto, " Tu, Domine, singulariter in spe constituisti me."1 Quum quis implicatur ra- tionibus Deo contrariis, stultitia et nequitia hujus mundi, non est sui compos, et ita dividitur et distra- 1 Colet has twice before (p. 70, and p. 77) referred to this pas sage ; and it is observable what force he attaches to the word singula riter in the Latin version. Wycliffe's rendering exhibits the form of the text in that version most closely : — " In pes into itself I shal slepe and reste. For thou, Lord, singulerli in hope hast togidere set me." {Forshall and Madden's edition, 1850). The interpretation above given of singulariter, namely " in simpli city," or " singleness of heart," is perhaps due to Augustine's Com mentary on the text. His words are : — " Et bene ait singulariter : potest enim referri adversus illos multos qui, multiplicati a tempore frumenti, vini et olei sui, dicunt Quis ostendit nobis bona ? perit enim hsec multiplicitas, et singularitas tenetur in Sanctis, de quibus dicitur in Actibus Apostolorum, Multitudinis autem credentium erat anima una et cor unum (iv. 32). Singulares ergo et simplices, id est, secreti a multitudine ac turba nascentium rerum ac morientium, amatores seter- nitatis et unitatis esse debemus, si uni Deo et Domino nostro cupimus inha?rere." — Enarratio in Psalmum iv. DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESU5J. 81 hitur, ut in solo Deo uno et individuo sperare non possit. Primus ergo labor et negotium est sacerdo- tii in ecclesia, ut expurget et purificet homines in simplicitatem et spem Deo; ut desperare desinant et sperare incipiant ; ut, • remotis dispositionibus con- trariis, quum jam in summa spe sint in Deo, hoc ipso sint regeniti, ut inde simul promoti perficiantur. Quod docet divus Petrus in Epistola ad dispersos Judaeos, sic exorsus : " Benedictus Deus et Pater 1 Pet. i. 3. Domini nostri Jesu Christi, qui secundum misericor diam suam regeneravit nos in spem vivam, per resur- rectionem [Jesu Christi ex mor]tuis ;" in quo homines simul resurgunt per potentiam Patris a vita mori- bund&, interminata desperatione, in spem vivam, ut in Patre genitore quisque jam sperans sit, vivens, et habeat esse unitatis et simplicitatis in Patre, cui unitas et potentia attribuitur, per quern potenter est in spe, et stabilit[ur] purgatoria, vi ministrorum Dei. Ad CoUocenses inquit Paulus : " Immobiles a spe Coi. i. 23. evangelii quod accepistis." Est in hac spe immobi- litas et paterna constantia, quae est proprie in esse et unitate, quae unitas Patris est et potentis genitoris, in quo potenter vivunt homines, qui ministri sunt Dei, quorum opus est, ut scribit Paulus ad Hebraeos, " Introductio melioris spei, per quam proximamus ad Hebr. vii. 19. Deum." Nam soluti in mundo longe absunt a Deo. Et qui in multis mundi rebus sunt distracti diversa spe et expectatione earum, ii revera non sunt, et desperantes Deum nihil sunt. Ut recolligantur et reuniantur spe uni Deo, per quam ad Deum proxi- ment, despectis et abjectis omnibus in quibus spera- verunt terrenis, multiplicibus et divisis distrahenti- busque homines, — ut sit (inquam) recollectio et intro- Q 82 ' DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIA. ductio in spem meliorem, per quam proximent Deo, est labor et officium paternae administrationis et spiritalis regenerationis in Deo. Et in hoc paterni sacerdotii in ecclesia est prima actio, ut desperationis pulverem discutiat, et depellat adversantia et impe- dientia omnia divinam reformationem, nudetque quasi statuam humanam novo colore depingendam, procreet hominem in suam ipsius simplicem unitatem, educat ab aquis hujus mundi in spiritum Dei, ab imo terrae in altum cceli; ut in monte spei extet vicinus Deo; ut ab illo illustretur et exornetur, exuat vetustatem male olentem ex faece hujus mundi, et induat [since- ram novitatem]; abradat a vase amarum saporem veteris imbutionis, ut sit novum vas suavissimi vini Dei; spoliet et detrahat foedam et squalidam vestem, quam ipse sibi homo rudi arte ex terra, hujus mundi contexuit, et induat eam novam et coelestem, ex ma teria gratiae lucis,1 Spiritus Sancti digitis contextam; sit anima penitus simplex, una, individua, in unam partem duntaxat et unice intenta in unum Deum mera et indivisibili spe, puncto hoc spei constans in Deo, et Mc radice alte infixus in terra viventium ; ut radicatus spe pulchre crescat fide, et charitate fructi- ficet utiliter et spisse bona opera in vitam aeternam. Primus ergo effectus sacerdotii in humiliori ecclesiae parte est spes Deo, qui finis est purgationis; quae eadem spes etiam humilitas, subjectio, et obedientia est Deo; ut ab illo in divinam formam exaltetur. Haec sunt quae vel spes ipsa est, vel spem indivisibi- liter comitantur, et simul in ea emergente anima ex hoc mundano mari se ostentant; videlicet puritas, nuditas, simplicitas, unitas, potentia, constantia, sta- 1 Gratim lucis.] Probably one of these words should be omitted. DE . SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIA. 83 bilitas, firmitas, radicatio, humilitas, subjectio, obedi- entia, essentia, generatio, filiatio, vita, initium, fund- amentum, et ejusmodi omnia, quae principii rationem habent, et inchoationis soliditatem. Est enim certe homo sperans Deo purus, nudus, simplex, in se unus, radicatus humiliter, subjectus obedienter, generatus in esse firmo, potenti, constanti, stabili, filius Dei vivus jam inchoatus et fundatus alta, et solida, spe, ut in reliquum aedificium perficiatur. Ut homo reducatur in hanc et obedientem spem, elaborant ministri assidue, docentes ex sacris Uteris quam sperandum est in Deo, quam simul quae mundi sunt desperanda et abjicienda. Hi ostiarii, lectores, exorcistae, et id genus hominum qui in inferiori ec clesia in purgandis hominibus spiritaliter se exercent : catechumeni vero vocantur qui sic instruuntur, et ilia operatio catechizatio vocatur. In Epistola ad Galathas praecipit Paulus : " Communicet is qui cate- Gal. vi. 6. chizatur verbo ei qui se catechizat, in omnibus bonis." Oportet doceatur ut abrenunciet quae sunt hujus [mundi] omnia, ut in spem soli Deo deinceps se reci- piat. Hoc significat depositio vestium et hominis nu- datio in novum indumentum,1 ut poeniteat maleactae 1 Indumentum.] To the same effect Colet writes under the head of Spiritalis Speculatio Baptismi (School MS. fol. 34* b.) : — " Christian- itas est professio simplicitatis, in quam trahitur homo, ut a multitudine in simplicitatem. Non patitur Christus simplex duplicem tunicam. In ejus veste nuptiali si vis esse, faciendum est ut nudus accedas, ut eam induas, pristinamque vivendi formam deponas, ut subeas eam quse Christi est. Id velit [vult] et significat quod exuit vestes omnes is qui se confert in Christum; quod exspuit et exsufflat ad occidentem, et magna protestatione abrenunciat quicquid est iniquitatis; quod se in orientem nudum jam penitus objicit radiis exorti solis justitise ; id, in- quam, significat, ut purgatus et simplex simplicem et purum divinum radium capiat, et vestem lucis et justitia? induat, quam in Christo con- texit gratia sancti Spiritus." 84 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIAE. vitae, ut confiteatur se peccasse, ut habeat voluntatem redimendi tempus, et recompensandi ilia mala cum bonis in Deo, ac satisfaciendi modo deinceps contrario ; ut bonitatis lanx, quae erat ante depressa, justa satis- factione peccatorum lancem adaequet; immo potius superet justitiae causa, ut erat ante superata. Quum enim confessorum peccatorum te pceniteat tui, salus esse non potest quidem, nisi redimas tempus, recom penses, et satisfacias, exsurgas ut superes, sicut eras superatus, pugnes, prosternas, vincas, malum cum bono superes ; ut justa, recompensatione sit pro malis tuis satisfactio in bonitate, vel re vel voluntate, ut energens in te ea justitia a justo Deo apprehendare. Quid ergo cuique peccato contrarium, et sua cuique vitio quae propria virtus, diligenter docendi sunt ca- techumeni ; ut discant in meliori vita pro malis bona recompensare, et pro peccatis in justitiae operibus sa- tisfacere, ut simul cum justitia sit misericordia Dei; ut erat in peccatis libido et voluptas, ita pro eisdem dolor et tristitia sit, et quidam animo angor et cor poris cruciatus, qui ut ignis expurget labes pecca torum, et eradicet funditus, ut iterum non pullu- lent. Quum in manibus ministrorum est aliquis ut purgetur, utque colluviem peccatorum lacrymis lavet et abstergat, vel catechumenus, vel poenitens, vel energumenus,1 vel apostata, tametsi is rursus sit in ecclesia tamen non numeratur, nee est ex hierarchia et corpore Christi; in quo nemo esse 1 Energumenus.] Cf. Dionys. Eccl. Hier. c. iii. § 6. " Post ha3c, extra delubrum catechumini fiunt, et cum ipsis energumini, et ii quoque qui in penitentia sunt. Manent autem intus soli qui divina spectare merentur atque percipere." See also Sir Peter King's Enquiry into the Primitive Church (1713), p. 106. DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIiE. 85 potest, nisi purgatus et perfectus. Unde constat omnes malos Christianos non esse in ecclesia, sed extra, ut purgentur: et interea, dum peccatorum contagione infecti sunt, eis non licere nee mysteria audire, nee sacramenta aspicere, quoniam profanos et foedos habent oculos. Quae sunt ad vitae eruditionem, audire possunt; uti sunt ex sacris Uteris cantus et lectiones.1 At quum sacramenta aguntur, longe pro- pellantur; foedi enim et turpes illuminari non pos sunt, ut videant sacra, quae nemo recte discernit nisi illuminatus fide, ut " in lumine Dei lumen videat :" fidei autem acies in peccatorum flumine exstinguitur. Fide spectantur sacramenta, et eorum mysteria intel- liguntur. Ut autem credamus, sine peccato [esse] oportet. Infuscatur enim et obtenebratur fides in peccatorum caligine et fumo. Ait ille, " Adhuc in 1 Cor. xv. 17. peccatis vestris estis." Donee ergo deponatur tetra ilia et detestabilis vestis scelerum et dolorum, ac tristitiae facibus comburatur, et pro ea vicissim nudus ille modo induat nitidam et amabilem vestem nuptia- lem, in mensa ccelestium dapum et sacramentorum Dei non discumbat. De Mc re distincte, tanquam de sacramento, non locutus est Dionysius ;3 quoniam est potius via et paratio ad sacrament[um quam] sa- 1 Lectiones.] See Bingham, Origines (1711), iii. p. 160. " The Church, ever since she first divided her Catechumens and Penitents into distinct orders and classes, had also distinct places in the church for them. And this lower part of the church was the place of the Energumens, and such of the Catechumens and Penitents as were commonly called Audientes, that is, Hearers, because they were allowed to stand here to hear the Psalms and Scriptures read, and the Sermon made by the Preacher ; after which they were dismissed with out any Prayers or Solemn Benediction." 2 Dionysius.] In the Eccl. Hierar. c. ii. where Dionysius is de- scribing the ceremonies at Baptism, mention is made of the stripping 86 DE SACRAMENTIS ECCLESIA. cramentum; ut exuere antecedit induere, et recon- ciliatio amicitiam, et procuratio adoptionem, et'curatio sanitatem, et lotio ac tersio nitorem. Justa ilia mi sericordia et misericors justitia non miseretur quidem nisi in justitia. Confessionem quum videt peccato rum, pce'nitentiam, et satisfactionem, tum miseretur juste et misericorditer justificat. Et hoc quoque, quotienscunque hanc justitiae voluntatem in nobis deprehendit, confessionis, poenitentiae et satisfactionis,1 fidefragi sumus, et amicitia, professa, deficimus, et a gradu stationis nostrae miseri delabimur. Sed ilia supra quam excogitari potest indulgens pietas Dei (quae non vult mortem peccatoris, sed ut convertatur et vivat), quotienscunque ex casu resurgimus, pudore et dolore affecti quod turpiter decidimus, et correptis armis iterum bona, spe in spiritalem hostem animosi- ter irruimus, dux nostrae militiae divina ilia pietas nostram industriam et voluntatem debellandi non recusat; quinimmo amplectitur, fovet, laudat, coro- off his own apparel from a person about to be baptized : — " Quam (precem) cum omnis secum ecclesia terminaverit, discingit quidem ipsum, ac ministrorum manibus exuit." Pachymeres, in his Para phrase, expands this into something resembling the text : — " Deinde dicit de vestium depositione. Cum enim non liceat alicui summe con- trariorum participem existere, sanitatis, v. g. et morbi, et peccati et virtutis, et ignorantise cognitionisque Dei, divisam etiam necesse sit habere vitam qui utraque amplectitur ; proptereaque liberum esse oporteat qui ad alteram vitam transfertur, nullum affectum retinendo prioris vitas : idcirco, qui adducitur, nudus sistitur." — Venice Edition (1755), i. 183. 1 Satisfactionis,] The sense here is somewhat obscure ; unless we suppose something to have been missed out after satisfactionis. Pos sibly quanquam may have been written instead of, or in addition to, quoque above (the contractions of the two words being similar) ; in which ease the sense would be : — " And this too (God does), although, as often as he marks in us this desire of righteousness, confession, penitence and compensation, we (again) break our pledge,