ANCIENT ART AND ITS REMAINS; MANUAL OF THE ARCHiEOLOGY OF ART. BY C. 0. MtJLLER, Author of " The Histoty unil Antiquities of the Doric Race," " A Scientific System of Mythology,"' &c NEW EDITION-WITH NUMEROUS ADDITIONS BY F. G. WELCKER. TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN BY JOHN LEITCH. LONDON: A. FULLARTON AND CO., NEWGATE STREET. 1850. ^3oF\o\o liRlNEUIlGH: KULLAKTON AND 5IACMAB, PRINTEES, LEITH WAtK, DEDICATED TO THE EIGHT HOSOOJIABLE SIR ROBERT PEEL, BART., M.P., WITH SINCERE ADMIRATION OE HIS VIRTUES AND TALENTS, BY THE TEANSLATOE. TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE. In this Translation I have endeavoured to avoid, as much as pos sible, the introduction of new words; but, in the original, various technical terms occur, with which, notwithstanding their novelty to the English reader, I could not dispense; because their rejection would occasion, in some measure, a sacrifice of sense, or a disturb ance of the system pursued by the author, — as in Tectonics and Architectonics for example. I may also mention the word scalpture. It is not, I believe, in use in our language, but as scalptura designates a particular branch of ancient art, I did not hesitate to Anglicise it. It may be proper also to explain, that throughout the work a dis tinction is kept up between column and pillar, the former denoting the circular supporting member of the different orders of architec ture, the latter the square pier. The words formative and plastic, likewise, are employed as convertible epithets, except in a few in stances where the latter is used in its original and more restricted sense; in these, however, its meaning may be discovered from the context. The most learned of my readers will be most ready to make allowance for the difficulties of my task, which were greatly en hanced, at least in the notes, by the author's desire to express his ideas in the briefest possible manner. By the perhaps too unspar ing use of ellipsis he has frequently rendered his meaning obscure or ambiguous. In some instances I was enabled to discover the sense by my recollection of the monuments described, in many others by reference to the author's sources, and in some cases I have derived considerable benefit from the suggestions of Professor Donaldson, whose valuable works on the architectural remains of Greece and Italy are so frequently referred to by MUller, and to whom I take this opportunity of offering my warmest thanks for his obliging assistance. Nevertheless I cannot flatter myself that 1 have always succeeded in overcoming the difficulties I have had to encounter, and, in glancing over the work, I still find passages which I should have wished to amend. vi TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE. It would certainly have been desirable to have the references throughout the work verified, but I was withheld from making this addition to my labour, by their immense number, my other engage ments, and the difficulty of getting access to the works referred to, many of which are not to be found in any of our public libraries. However, I have in numerous instances consulted the authorities quoted, when I wished to clear up any doubt or obscurity; and on such occasions I have very rarely discovered any inaccuracy in the citation. When I was aware of any foreign work having been translated into English I transferred the reference to the translation. The present work will probably be followed by Miiller and Oes- terley's " Monuments of Ancient Art," when the original work, which is now in course of publication at Gbttingen, will have been completed. It is intended as a companion to this Manual, and con tains numerous plates illustrating the different periods of art, ac cording to the system here pursued. London, 22 Welbeck Street, July, 1847. The present edition of this work, besides containing all the addi tions in the last German edition, which were partly derived from the manuscripts of the lamented author, and in great part contri buted by the Editor, Professor Welcker of Bonn, is enriched with a considerable number of additions which that eminent archasologist was so obliging as to transmit to me while the translation was pass ing through .the press. It will be easy to distinguish his share in the work, as his contributions are all enclosed within brackets. The paragraph on Nineveh was written before the publication of Capt. Layard's work, and his discoveries, therefore, are not mentioned. I very recently requested from Mr. Welcker a supplementary no tice of them, which I would have appended to the book, but he thinks it better to be silent until he can obtain a more connected and leisurely view of those important discoveries, and be thus enabled to treat the subject in a more complete and satisfactory manner. • The additions, which are with very few exceptions confined to the notes, amount altogether to several thousands, and this edition is nearly a fourth larger than the last. J. L. Rothesay, May 1850. AUTHOR'S PREFACE. As the book which I now present for a second time to the public, has been found useful in its earlier form, I have allowed the latter to remain on the whole unaltered, and have even marked several new paragraphs (§. 75*. 157*. 241*. 324*. 345*. 345**.) so as that the previous arrangement might not be disturbed by them. I am indeed aware that much other information on inscriptions, coins, and the topographical references of monuments might be expected in a Manual of Archseology; but I have been forced by my plan to exclude everything whereby our knowledge of the formative art in antiquity was not immediately advanced, and have been obliged, therefore, for example, to treat coins merely as highly important re mains of ancient art, but not as monuments of the political life and commerce of the ancients — the chief consideration, and which has been still too little brought into view, in this study. On the other hand, I am in like manner convinced, that far more can be done than this Manual attempts, in the exposition of the internal princi ples by which the artists were guided, consciously or unconsciously, in the development of their ideas. However, I have also, in this new edition, adhered to the opinion that its object should be nothing more than to collect the sum and substance of the previous treat ment of the science, and, therefore, that it should only communicate the most certain and evident observations on these questions, which have not yet been sufficiently examined in their higher connexion. I have considered it my duty to practise a similar self-denial in re gard to the mythology of art, on which my views still differ widely from those which are held, for the most part, by the present genera tion of archaeological inquirers. If, as they assert, the sculptors of antiquity sought consciously and designedly to express in their works certain fundamental ideas of heathendom, which are therefore to be interpreted, so to speak, as hieroglyphics of a physical theo logy, we ought not, in my opinion, to expect from the artists of the best era of Greek art a greater knowledge of their hereditary faith than we should from any person among the people; but every thing else was, with the creative spirits among the artists, an activity as free and peculiar to them, dependent only on the requirements of their art, as the development of any mythus into a Sophoclean tra gedy. In whatever way this question, which ought to receive in our time a thorough investigation, may be decided, the adherents of this doctrine cannot bring against the present Manual the reproach viii AUTHOR'S PREFACE. that it gives little information regarding an ancient system of theo logy which can be discovered alone from works of art. But I have so much the more endeavoured to complete, define more precisely, and arrange more accurately the facts which should find a place in my book. The great additions to our knowledge of ancient art during the last few years have not been patched on, in notices hastily raked together, but have, with continued attention, been interwoven with the whole. The numerous criticisms to which the work has been subjected on the part of various learned archaso- logists, have also been carefully turned to account. But, altogether, I may say that the labour attending this second edition has been scarcely less than that which was at first expended on the entire work. I cannot flatter myself that I have always hit the proper medium between scantiness and superfluity of materials. Those who possess a knowledge of the subject will readily discover the principles which I laid down for myself as to the facts and monuments which the work should embrace; but in many cases, however, I might be guided merely by a subjective, sometimes by a momentary feeling. My task was rendered more difficult from the circumstance that I intended my book to form at the same time a basis for oral exposi tions and a Manual for the private student, as a separation of the two objects might not be advisable in the present state of our studies. Hence there is more matter given in this book than can be developed and exhausted in an academical course of a hundred lectures; and although, perhaps, it might be made the basis of archaeological prelections of very different kinds, yet each lecturer might still employ a free and independent method of his own; in deed, the author himself has latterly found it the best plan to anti cipate in the first or historical part what it is most important to know on the technics, forms and subjects of ancient art, without be ing the less convinced on that account that the systematic arrange ment of the second part is of essential advantage to the study. GoTTiSGEN, January 1835. EXPLANATION OF ABBREVIATIONS AND METHODS OF CITATION. C. A. stands for Catalogus Artiiicum (by Sillig). C. I. — Corpus Inscriptionum Grsecarum (by Bockh). D. N. — ¦ Doctrina Numorum (by Eckhel). D. A. K. — • Denkmaler der Alten Kunst, see page 18. G. — Galerie, Galeria. G. M. — Galerie Mythologique (by Millin). g. — gens (in the so-called family coins). Inst. — Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica, see page 1 7. M. — Museum, Musee, Museo. M. I. Mon. In. — Monumenti Inediti, Monumens ine'dits. N. — Numi. N. Brit. — Veterum popul. et regum numi, qui in Mu seo Britannico asservantur (by T. Combe). N. H. — Naturalis Historia (by Pliny). N. Pomp. — Pompeiana, New Series (by Sir W. Gell). No. — Number (in the enumeration of Monuments). 01. — • Olympiad. P. gr. — Pierres gravees. PCI. M. PCI. — n Museo Pio-Clementino, see page 17. V. — ViUa. In the titles of books B. denotes Berlin, F. Firenze, L. Loudon, N. Napoli, P. Paris, E. Koma, V. Venezia. In the Mythological Division the single initial letters constantly denote the deity named at the beginning and in the heading of the Section. The figures accompanying the Letter L. denote the numbers of the antiquities in the Mus^e Royal in the Louvre according to the Description of 1830. (see p. 288.), those with the antiquities of Dresden, the numbers in the Catalogue of 1833 (see p. 292.), and those marking the antiquities of Munich are taken from the Description of the Glyptotheca by Klenze and Schorn. The antiquities in the British Museum are sometimes quoted by the numbers which they had in the year 1822. R. with a number cites the remark on the paragraph; the number alone re fers to the division of the §. itself. The Remarks always belong to that divi sion of the §. which has the corresponding No. on the margin. X EXPLANATIONS OF ABBRBYIATIONS, &o. Bouill. The work of Bouillon the painter (see p. 17.) is, for the sake of brevity, always quoted so as that the numbers of the plates run on from the beginning to the end of each volume. Micali's Engravings (see p. 160.) ai'e always quoted in the new and enlarged form of the work, if the earlier edition is not expressly mentioned. Mionnet's Empr. refers to the impressions of coins enumerated in the Cata logue d'une Collection d'Empreintes. Paris an. 8., and which are in the archseo- logical collection of Gottingen, together with numerous additional impressions from the same hand. The latter are quoted by the numbers which they bear in Mionnet's Description de Me'dailles antiques Grecques et Romaines. Mionnet PI. denotes the volume of engravings which accompanies the Description. In the enumeration of monuments of one kind a semicolon between the re ferences denotes the difference of the monument. For example two different statues are indicated by M. PCI. ii, 30. ; M. Cap. iii, 32. one and the same by M. PCI. i, 12. Bouill. i, 15. CONTENTS, INTRODUCTION. A. THEORETICAL PORTION. Page 1. Analysis of the Idea of Art. §. 1 sqq. .... 1 2. The simplest and most general Laws of Art. §.9. . . 3 3. Division of Art. §.15. . . . . . .5 4. General reflections on the Historical appearance of the Arts, especially the Formative. §.29. . . . . . 11 B. LITERARY INTRODnOTION. §. 35. . . . . 12 HISTORY OP ART IN ANTIQUITY. THE GREEKS. FIRST PERIOD, TILL ABOUT THE 50tH OLYMPIAD. 1. General Conditions and Main Features of the Development of Art. §.40 2. Architectonics. §. 45. ...... 3. Tectonics. §. 56. . 4. Formative Art. §.64. . . ... 5. Beginnings of Painting. §. 73. . 19 20 29 33 41 SECOND PERIOD. FROM THE 50th TO THE 80tH OLYMPIAD. 1. The Character of the Age in general. §. 76. 2. Architectonics. §. 80. . 3. The Plastic Art. a. Its extended cultivation. §. 82. b. Religious Statues. §. 83. c. Statues of Honour. §. 87. d. Mythological Figures as consecrated gifts. e. Sculptures of Temples. §. 90. f. Style of the Formative Art. §.91. g. Remains of the Plastic Art. §. 96. The Art of Engraving Stones and Dies. §. 97. 4. Painting. §. 99. ... . 43 45 . 48 50 . 52 §. 89. . 54 . 54 58 . 60 65 . 67 xii CONTENTS. THIRD PERIOD. FROM THE 80TH TO THE IUtH OLYMPIAD. Page 1. The Events and Spirit of the Age in relation to Art. §. lOO. . 70 2. Architectonics. §. 105. . . .73 3. The Plastic Art. a. The age of Phidias and Polyclitus. §.112. . .81 b. The age of Praxiteles and Lysippus. §. 124. . . 95 The Art of Engraving Stones and Dies. §. 131. . 109 4. Painting. §. 133. . . . . .111 FOURTH PERIOD. i'ROM THE lllTH TO THE THIRD YEAR OF THE 158th OL. 1. Events and Character of the Period. §. 144. . . .120 2. Architectonics. §. 149. ...... 123 3. The Plastic Art. §. 154. . . . . . .128 The Art of Engraving Stones and Dies. §.161. . . .136 4. Painting. §. 163. .... . . 137 Pillage and devastation in Greece. §. 164. . 140 EPISODE. ON GREE:C ART AMONG THE ITALIAJf NATIONS BEFORE OLYMPIAD 158, 3. 1. Original Greek race. §. 166. . . . . . .144 2. The Etruscans. §. 167. ...... 145 3. Rome before the year of the city 606. §.179. . , .161 FIFTH PERIOD. FROM THE YEAR OF THE CITY (OLYMPIAD 1 58, 3.) TILL THE MIDDLE AGES. 1 . General reflections on the character and spirit of the time. §.183. . 165 2. Architectonics. §. 188. . . . . .168 3. The Plastic Art. §. 196. . . ... 182 4. Painting. §. 208. ... . . 200 Destruction of Works of Art. §.214. . . . 207 APPENDIX. THE NATIONS NOT OF GREEK RACE. I. EGYPTIANS. 1. General remarks. §. 215. . . 209 2. Architectonics. §. 219. ...... 217 3. The Plastic Arts and Painting. a. The Technics and Treatment of Forms. §. 228. . . 226 b. Subjects. §. 232. . . . . . .231 II. THE SYRIAN RACES. §. 234. . . .238 A. BABYLONIANS. 1. Architectonics. §. 235. . . . 238 2. The Plastic Alt. §. 237. . . .240 B, PH(ENIOIAN AND NEIGHBOURING TRIBES. 1, Architectonics. §. 239. . . 243 2. The Plastic Art. §. 240. ... 244 C. ASIA MINOR. §.241*. . . . _ 247 III. THE NATIONS OF THE ARIAN RACE. §. 242. . 248 1. Architectonics. §. 243. . . . 249 2. The Plastic Art; §. 245*. ... ' ^52 CONTENTS. xiii Pngc IV. THE INDIANS. §. 249. . . . 257 SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT OF ANCIENT ART. PRELIMINARY DIVISION. GEOGRAPHY OF" ANCIENT MONU MENTS OF ART. 1. General remarks. §.251. . 261 2. Greece. §. 252. ... 262 3. Asia and Africa. §. 255. . . . 267 4. Italy. §. 257. . . .269 5. The West of Europe. §. 262. . . .286 6. Germany and the North. §. 264. ... 292 FIRST MAIN DIVISION. TECTONICS. §. 266. . 299 I. BUILDINGS.-, ARCHITECTONICS. §• 267. 299 1 . Building materials. §. 268. . . 300 2. The simple geometric fundamental forms. §. 273. . 303 3. The architectural members. §. 275. . . . 305 4. Kinds of Buildings. §.286. . 315 XL FURNITURE AND UTENSILS. §• 297. . . 334 SECOND MAIN DIVISION. THE FORMATIVE ART. §. 303. . . . 343 FIRST PART. OF THE TECHNICS OF ANCIENT ART. §. 304. . 343 I. MECHANICAL TECHNICS. A. OF THE PLASTIC ART IN ITS MORE EXTENDED SENSE. 1. The Plastic Art strictly so-called, or modelling in soft or softened masses. a. Working in Clay and other materials. §. 305. . 344 b. Metal-casting. §. 306. . . 346 2. Working in hard masses. a. Wood-carving. §. 308. . . . . .350 b. Sculpture. §. 309. . . . .351 c. Working in Metals and Ivory. §. 311. . 354 d. Working in Precious Stones. §. 313. . . 359 e. Working in Glass. §. 316. . . 365 f. Art of Die-cutting. §. 317. . . . . 366 E. DRAWING ON A PLANE SURFACE. 1. By laying on colouring stuffs of a soft and fluid nature. a. Monochrome Drawing and Painting. §.318. . 368 b. Painting in Water-colours. §. 319. . . . 368 c. Encaustic Painting. §. 320. ... 371 d. Vase-painting. §. 321. . . . . . 374 2. Designingby the junction of solid materials, Mosaic-work. §.322. 376 II. OPTICAL TECHNICS. §. 323. . . .379 SECOND PART. ON THE FORMS OF THE PLASTIC ART. §. 324. 382 CONTENTS. I. POEMS OP NATURE AND LIFE. A. OF THE HUMAN BODY. 1. General principles. §. 325. . 2. Character and beauty of individual forms. a. Studies of the ancient artists. §. 328. b. Treatment of the countenance. §.329. c. Treatment of the rest of the body. §.331. . d. Proportions. §. 332. .... e. Colouring. §. 333. ..... f. Combination of human with other forms. §. 334. g. The body and features in action. §. 335. B. DRAPERY. 1 . General principles. §. 336. 2. Grecian male costume. §. 337. 3. Female costume. §. 339. .... 4. Roman costume. §. 341 . . . . 5. Military costume. §. 342. 6. Treatment of the drapery. §. 343. C. OF ATTRIBUTES AND ATTRIBUTIVE ACTIONS. §. 344. II. FORMS CREATED BT ART. §. 343. 383 385 386390 391393 394395 397 399 403 406 407 409410412 THIRD PART. ON THE SUBJECTS OF THE FORMATIVE ART. §. 346. 417 I. MYiriOLOQIOAL SUBJECTS. §. 347. . 417 A. THE TWELVE OLYMPIAN DEITIES. 1. Zeus, or Jupiter. §. 349. 2. Hera, or Juno. §. 352. 3. Poseidon, or Neptune. §. 354. 4. Demeter, or Ceres. §. 357. 5. Apollo. §. 359. 6. Artemis, or Diana. §. 363. 7. Hephtestus, or Vulcan. §. 366. 8. Pallas Athena, or Minerva. §. 368. . 9. Ares, or Mars. §. 372. 10. Aphrodite, or Venus. §. 374. 11. Heraies, or Mercury. §. 379. .... 12. Hestia, or Vesta. §. 382. E. THE OTHER DEITIES. 1. Dionysian cycle. a. Dionysus, or Bacchus. §. 383. b. Satyrs. §. 385. .... c. Sileni. §. 386. d. Pans. §. 387. e. Female figures. §. 388. f. Centaurs. §. 389. g. The Thiasos of Dionysus in general. §. 390. 2. Cycle of Eros, or Cupid. §.391. 3. The Muses. §. 393. 4. Gods of health. §. 394. 5. The primeval world; creation of Man. §. 395. C. The Lower World and Death. §. 397. 7. Destiny and government of the world. §. 398. 419428 431435441 452458 460469472 481487 488496499 501 503505507 509 515518520524528 CONTENTS. XV 8. Time. §. 399. 9. Beings of light. §. 400. 10. The Winds. §. 401. H. The element of Water. §. 402. 1 2. Tlie Vegetation of the Country. §. 404. 13. Country, City and House. §. 405. 14. Human activities and conditions. §. 406. 15. The Gods of early Italy. §. 407, 1 6. Foreign Oriental Deities. §. 408. C. HEROES. §. 409. 1. Hercules. §. 410. 2. The other Heroic Cycles. §, 412. Pago 530531 534 53.''> 540 542546 549549 552 553 562 II. SUBJECTS FROM HUMAN LIFE. A. OF AN INDIVIDUAL KIND. 1 . Historical representations. §. 419. 2. Portraits. §. 420. B. REPRESENTATIONS OP A GENERAL KIND. 1. Religious transactions. §. 422. 2. Agones. §. 423. .... 3. War. §. 426. .... 4. The chase, country life, economical occupations. §. 427. 5. Domestic and married life. §. 428. 6. Death. §.431. 593 596602 606612614 616 620 III. SUBJECTS PROM THE BEST OP NATURE. 1. Animals and Plants. §. 433. 2. Arabesques, Landscape. §. 435. 3. Amulets, Symbols. §. 436. Index. 622 625 627 629 INTRODUCTION. A. THEORETICAL PORTION. I. ANALYSIS OF THE IDEA OF ART. §. 1. Art is a representation, that is an activity by means 1 of •which something internal or spiritual is revealed to sense. — Its only object is to represent, and it is distinguished by its 2 being satisfied therewith from all practical activities which are directed to some particular purpose of external life. 2. Because the exercise of art is aimless it is often called, especially among nations of a practical turn of mind, a sport, Indus. Useful in contradistinction to fine art is mere handicraft. 2. The more immediate determination in art depends espe- 1 cially on the kind of connexion between the internal and the external, the representing and the ^represented. This con- 2 nexion must absolutely be one impanted of necessity in the nature of man, not assumed from arbitrary regulation. It is 3 not a subject of acquisition, although it may exercise greater or less influence on different natures and different stages of civilization. 3. The spiritual significance of a series of tones, the character and expression of a countenance, are not learned, although more strongly and delicately felt by one than another. Nature herself has established this sympathy of the mind with sensible forms, and on it all art depends. 3. At the same time this correspondence in art is so close 1 and intimate that the internal or spiritual momentum imme diately impels to the external representation, and is only com pletely developed in the mind by the representation. Hence 2 the artistic activity is from the very beginning in the soul directed to the external manifestation, and art is universally regarded as a making, a creating (art, r'syvr^. 1. The artistic representation, according to Kant, Kritik der Urtheil- skraft, s. 251, is a representation properly so called, {/¦jrori'Truais, exhihitio, and not a characterism, Uke language which is only a means for the re production of notions, and does not immediately represent them, A 2 INTRODUCTION. 1 4. The external or representing in art is a sensible form. 2 Now the sensible form which is capable of expressing an internal life can be created by the fancy, or present itself to 3 the external senses in the world of reality. But as even or dinary vision, and much more every artistic exercise of sight, is at the same time an activity of the fancy, the form-creat ing fancy in general must be designated as the chief faculty of representation in art. 3. " The painter really paints with the eye ; his art is the art of see ing with regularity and beauty. Seeing is here entirely active, quite a formative activity." Novalis ii. s. 127. The difierence, therefore, be tween imitative and freely-creative art is not so distinct as it may ap pear. 5. The creative fanciful conception of the artistic form is accompanied by a subordinate but closely connected activity — the representation of the form in the materials — which we call execution. For example, the representation of the musical tone by song or instru ments, of the form of an organic body in stone or by colours. The less the artistic activity is developed, the less is the execution separate from the creation of the form, and the fashioning in the materials seems to be the first, the original object. 6. To the internal or represented in art — the spiritual life whose corresponding and satisfying expression is the ar tistic form, the soul of this body — we apply the term artistic idea, understanding thereby, in quite a general way, the mood and activity of the mind from which proceeds the conception of the particular form. Even a work of art copied from nature has still, however, its internal life in the artistic idea, that is, in the mental emotion to which the con templation of the object gave rise. 7. The artistic idea is never an idea in the ordinary sense (Die Kunstidee ist niemals ein Begriff), inasmuch as the lat ter is a frame into which different phenomena may fit, whereas the artistic idea must stand in the most intimate agreement with the altogether particular form of the work (§. 3), and therefore must itself be altogether particular; hence also the idea of a work of art can never be rendered in a thoroughly satisfactory manner by language, which is merely the expres sion of ideas or notions. This idea has no expression except the work of art itself. Represen tation of notions in art (for example, truth) is only apparent. A notion is not represented by a work of art, but rather a sum of concrete ideas and impressions which lie at the bottom of it. Allegory which indicates notions by external shapes, with the consciousness of their difference, is THEORY OP ART. 3 a play of the intellect which does not, strictly speaking, lie within the sphere of the artistic activity. 8. The artistic idea is rather an idea of a peculiar indim- ; dual kind, which is at the same time united with a strong and lively feeling of the soul, so that sometimes idea and feeling lie combined in one spiritual condition (an obscure mood), sometimes the idea comes forward more detached, but yet in the creation as well as the adoption of the artistic form the feeling remains predominant. 1. Schiller, in his correspondence with Gothe (vol. vi. Letter 784, p. 34), speaks in an interesting manner of the obscure total idea which pre cedes the production of a work of art, as the germ goes before the plant. Schiller's Auserlesene Briefe iii. s. 228. 2. The artistic idea of a simple melody which expresses a certain mood of the soul may be compared with that of a kindred work in sculp ture. The music of a dithyramb and a Bacchian group have to repre sent nigh-related ideas, but the group, even without taking into account the more fixed sensible impression of the artistic forms, represents the idea on which it is based in more perfect development and with greater distinctness. n. THE SIMPLEST AND MOST GENERAL LAWS OF ART. 9. The laws of art are nothing else than the conditions 1 under which alone the sensibility of the soul can be excited to agreeable emotions by external forms; they determine the 2 artistic form according to the demands of sensibility, and have their foundation therefore in the constitution of the sensitive faculty. 2. This constitution is here merely recognised in its manifestations ; the investigation of it belongs to psychology. 10. The artistic form must in the first place, in order to excite a connected emotion in the sensitive faculty, possess a general conformity to laws, which is manifested in the obser vance of mathematical relations or organic forms of life; without this regularity it ceases to be artistic form. Music affects us only by incorporating itself with mathematical rela tions, and sculpture only by investing itself with the organic forms of nature ; if they tear themselves away from these they lose the ground on which they can find access to our minds. II. But this conformity to law is not in itself capable of expressing an internal life; it is only a condition of repre sentation, the boundary of the artistic forms which range to and fro within, modifying, but on the whole preserving this conformity. 4 INTRODUCTION. This is the relation of the harmonic laws to melody, of the law of equilibrium in rhythm to the multiplicity of measures, of the organic fundamental form to the particular formations of the plastic art; viz. that these laws indeed condition the representation, but do not yet con tain any representation in themselves. 12. Whilst this regularity is the first requisite in the ar tistic form generally, beauty is a more immediate predicate of the artistic form in reference to sensation. We call those forrns beautiful which cause the soul to feel in a manner that is grateful, truly salutary and entirely conformable to its nature, which, as it were, produce in it vibrations that are in accordance with its inmost structure. Although the theory of art, by such a definition, consigns the further inquiry into the nature of the beautiful to sesthetios as a part of psy chology ; it may be seen, however, even from what has been laid down, how the beautiful severs itself from that which merely pleases the senses, and also why desire and personal interest are shut out from its enjoy ment. " I wish some one would try to banish the notion and even the word heauty from use, and as is right put truth in its most complete sense in its place." SohiUer, Briefwechsel II. s. 293. 13. As the soul naturally strives after this grateful and salutary emotion in its sensitive life, so the beautiful is cer tainly a principle of art, without, however, being ever in itself an object of representation, artistic idea in the above sense, as the latter (§. 7) is always an absolutely particular idea and sensation. On the contrary, beauty, carried to the highest point, even stands in direct hostility against every endeavour to produce something particular. 2. Hence the profound apophthegm of Winckelmann (vii. 76), that perfect beauty, Uke the purest water, must have no peculiarity. It has been disputed whether the beautiful or characteristic is an important principle of art. A thorough destruction of beauty and regularity by exaggerated characterizing is caricature ; on the contrary a partial, on the whole self-neutralizing destruction (dissonance, arrhythmy, apparent disproportion in architecture) may become an important means of repre sentation. 14. The sublime and the graceful may be regarded as op posite points in the chain of sensations which is denoted by the beautiful ; the former demands from the soul an energy of feeling wound up to the limits of her power, the latter draws her of itself, without any exaltation of her force, into a circle of agreeable sensations. 15._ It lies in the notion of a work of art as an intimate combination of an artistic idea with external forms, that it must have a unity to which everything in the work may be referred, and by which the different parts, whether succes sively or simultaneously existing, may be so held together. THEORY OF ART. that the one, as it were, demands the other and makes it necessary. The work must be one and a whole. III. DIVISION OF ART. 16. The division of art is especially dependent on the 1 nature of the forms by means of which it represents, although it is not to be doubted that even artistic ideas, in intimate agreement with artistic forms, are of different kinds in dif ferent arts, at their .first dawning. Now, all forms to 2 which belongs a definite conformity to laws, are fitted to be come artistic forms, particularly the mathematical forms and proportions, on which depend in nature the figures of the celestial bodies and their systems, and the forms of mineral bodies; and, 2dly, the organic shapes in which life on our earth is more largely and highly developed. In this way art appears, as it were, a second nature which repeats and renews her processes. 17. In connexion herewith we note the circumstance, that 1 the more obscure and undeveloped the conception contained in the artistic idea, the more do the mathematical relations sufiice for its representation; but the clearer and more defi nite that conception becomes, the more are the forms borrowed from more highly and largely developed organic nature. Now, 2 as the scientific intellect completely penetrates only those mathematical relations, and, on the other hand, can never re solve organic life in the same degree into comprehension, so also the artistic fancy appears only in those forms freely cre ative, independent of external nature, whereas in the latter it is more fettered and altogether confined to the observation of what is externally present. 1. Rhythmic, music and architecture, which operate by mathematical proportions, represent ideas of a more obscure description — which are less developed and articulate. The fundamental forms of the universe, but not of any individual life, are forms of the same kind in time and space. The forms of vegetative life (landscape-painting) admit of more distinctness of conception ; but those of the highest animal life in the greatest degree (historical painting, sculpture). We even find that the animal kingdom is not shut out from the enjoyment of artistic forms of the first kind ; there are musical and architectonic, but no plastic in stincts. Every art fails when it would employ its forms otherwise than agreeably to their destination ; music, for instance, when it paints. 18. Every form presupposes a quantity, which may be l either given in time or in space, in succession or co-existence. Time only comes to view and separate measurable quantity by movement. And indeed movement is so much the more 6 INTRODUCTION. to be regarded as a pure time-magnitude, the less that which belongs to space — the moving body and the line of movement — comes into consideration. Such a pure time-magnitude is the musical tone in reality, which, as such, rests altogether on the degree of rapidity in the regular vibrations of the sound ing body. The art which obtains the most perfect expression of artistic ideas from the succession and combination of these quicker or slower vibrations is music. 3. Musice est exercitium arithmetics occvZtum nescientis se numerare ani- mi, Leibnitz. Kant (p. 217) limits too much this correct observation when he maintains that Mathematics is merely the conditio sine qua non of the musical impression, but " has not the slightest participation in the charms and mental emotions to which music gives rise." With the musical tone, which alone cannot make itself manifest, sound is neces sarily combined in production ; that is the wave of sound striking on the ear, which is evidently formed differently in different instruments, and is not defined in a purely quantitative and measurable, but in a really qualitative manner. 19. The musical tone may be called a disguised time- magnitude, inasmuch as the difference of tones, which is but quantitative in reality, is, from the constitution of our sense, changed ere it reaches the mind into an apparently qualita tive difference. On the other hand, the tones again are de termined in their duration by another species of artistic forms in which the quantitative, the measuring of a time-magnitude distinctly presents itself to the mind, — in which we have the consciousness of measuring and counting. The art which ex presses its ideas by this kind of measures is rhythmic, which can never by itself alone appear as an art, but must enter into combination with all arts that represent by movement. 2. Rhythmic measures tones and movements of bodies. Moreover the notion of rhythm finds application also in the arts which represent in space, and here denotes a simple easily comprehended relation of quantities to one another. Rhythmic applied to language and condi tioned by this material is metric. 1 20. Another series of arts with time conjoins space, with the measure of movement its quality or kind and manner. Man can only realize such a representation in time and space 2 simultaneously by the movement of his own body. This series of arts reaches its highest point in mimic orchestics, an ex pressive art of dancing in which, besides the rhythm of the movement, its quality or manner, the beautiful and signifi- 3 cant gesture is artistic form. But manifestations of such an artistic activity pervade in greater or less degree, according to the dispositions of individuals and nations, the whole of life, and are combined with various arts. THEORY OF ART. 7 2. The mimic art in itself, when combined with the oratorical arts, is called declamation, among the Greeks irnfisix, sy^vjf^a.ra,. 3. Every movement and gesture speaks to us involuntarily ; without design we constantly represent spiritual life. To regulate this involun tary representation ^as a main point in Greek education. It was ex pected that by habituating to outward dignity and a noble bearing the mind would be also tuned to ), partly in manufacturing idols for the services of religion, wherein it was not the object to represent externally the notion of the deity which floated before the mind of the artist, but only to reproduce an accus- 2 tonied figure. The plastic art, therefore, long remained sub ordinate to a mechanical activity directed to the attainment of external objects, and the genuine spirit of sculpture existed 3 only in the germ. That feeling for what is significant and beautiful in the human form, and which was so deeply rooted in the Greek mind, found its gratification in the food afforded to it by the orchestic arts. Design, therefore, long continued rude and ill-proportioned. 2. ARCHITECTONICS. 1 45. The giant-walls of the Acropoleis must be regarded as the oldest works of Greek hands. By posterity, which could not conceive them to be the works of man, they were called in Argolis Cyclopean walls, but doubtless they were ARCHITECTONICS. 21 for the most part erected by the Pelasgians, the aboriginal but afterwards subjugated inhabitants ; hence they are also found in great numbers in Arcadia and Epirus, the chief countries of the Pelasgians. 1. T/fi/Kf rsix'oiaax II. ii, 669. STrix^rifii/oi/ rii}co; Pherecydes Schol. Od. xxi, 23. Ti^vD^iov TT'hiii^iv/.itt Hesych. Vi xuxKuTrei'x Argolis in Burip. Orest. 953. Kvny^aTrsiccoi/^amnrsixyiEleotrallGT. Kvx.Xii'irav AufiiT^ai Iph. Aul. 152. KvK7\.u7ri» ¦ffjdSuj* EujuffSs'a; Pindar Fr. inc. 151. Kuxfiairuoi/ Tgo^cdi' Sophocles in Hesych. s. v. x.iix.'hovs. Turres Cyclopes inven. Arist. in Plin. vii, 57. On their supposed origin (from Curetis, Thrace, Ly cia) : ad ApoUod. ii, 2, 1. 'Ciyuyta. d^x"^^" t^'x^ Hesych. 2. UiyixayiKO'j or IlsXajy/xoj/ riixos in Athens. [Gottling in the Rhein. Mus. f. Philologie 1843, iv. s. 321, 480. The same Die Gallerien und die Stoa von Tirynth, Archaol. Zeit 1845, N. 26. Taf. 26. Bxp^d. de la Moree II. p. 72.] Ten Cyclopean ruins in Argolis ("Ajyof neJiacrydj.) On the age and fortification of Lycosura in Arcadia, Pausan. viii, 38. Dodwell ii. p. 395. Sir W. Gell; City walls, pi. 11. On the very numerous Epi- rotic walls (Ephyra) Pouqueville Voyage dans la Grfece, T. i. p. 464 sqq. and elsewhere, Hughes' Travels, ii. p. 313. 46. The enormous, irregular, and polygonal blocks of 1 these walls are not, in the rudest and most ancient style, connected by any external means, and are entirely unhewn (agyo/), and the gaps are filled up with small stones (at Tiryns) ; in the more improved style, on the contrary, they are skilfully hewn and fitted to one another with great nicety (at Argos and partly at Mycense), from whence resulted the most indestructible of walls. The gates are mostly pyramidal ; 2 regular towers could not be easily employed. This mode of 3 building passed through various intermediate stages into the square method, which was in later times the prevailing one, although it is not to be denied that in all ages polygonal blocks were occasionally employed in substructions. 1. In the first and ruder style the main thing was the quarrying and removing of stones with levers (|«oj^?v£i/£;y Tlrjouf Burip. Cycl. 241 . conf. Od. ix, 240). The Cyclopean walls of Mycense, on the contrary, were formed, according to Burip. Here. Fur. 948 (Nonnus xii, 269), by means of the measuring-line and stone-axe, (poimx.! nxtiim xxi tux-oi; ii^fioafiha.. The stones were larger than x/^x^ixhi. The walls of Tiryns from 20 to 24^ feet thick. 2. In the gates the jambs and lintels are mostly single blocks, the stone-door was mortised in the middle. In regard to towers, an angular one is to be found at the termination of a wall at Mycense, and it is said that there was a semicircular one at Sipylus. In the walls of Mycense and Larissa, and especially at Tiryns (in Italy also), are to be found gable-shaped passages formed of blocks resting against each other. [Gott ling, das Thor von Mykena:, N. Rhein. Mus. i, S. 161. The gateway of Mycense, cleared away in 1842, is 5 paces in breadth, and proportionately long ; there are wheel tracks visible in the smooth slabs of the floor.] The 22 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. I. coursing of the stones too has often somewhat of the form of an arch. At Nauplia there were a%'iihai«, x,a.l h auroig oUolo,u.yiroi Xx/3iqi:/Boi called Cy- clopeia, Strab. viii. p. 369, 373. Probably quarries used as places of burial. Cyriacus of Ancona (1435) Insoriptiones sen Bpigr. Grseca et Lat. reperta per Illyricum, etc. Romse 1747 (MS. in the Barber. Library). Winckelmann Anmerk. iiber die Baukuns't. Th. i. §. 357, 535. Petit- Radel in the Magasin Encyclop. 1804. T. v. p. 446. 1806. T. vi. p. 168. 1807. T. V. p. 425. 1810. T. v. p. 340. (Controversy with Sickler, Mag. Enc. 1810. T. i. p. 242. T. iii. p. 342. 1811. T. ii. p. 49, 301.) in the Moniteur 1812, No. 110, in the Mus6e-Napoleon, T. iv. p. 16, in Voyage dans les principals villes de Fltalie, P. 1816, and the Ann. dell' Inst. i. p. 343. Comp. Memoires de I'lnstitut Royal, T. ii. Classe d'hist. p. 1. Raoul-Rochette Hist, de I'^tabl. des col. Gr. T. iv. p. 379 sqq., and Notice sur les Nuraghes de la Sardaigne. Paris 1826. Rapport de la 3e Classe de I'lnstitut an 1809. Rapport fait % la CI. des Beaux Arts 14 Aout 1811. W. Gell Argolis. L. 1810. Probestiicke von Stiidtemauern des al ten Griechenlands. Miinohenl831. Dodwell's Classical Tour. His Views and descriptions of Cyclopean or Pelasgic remains in Greece and Italy, with constructions of a later period. L. 1834 fo. 131 pi. [Petit-Radel Les Murs P^Iasg. de I'lt. in the Memorie d. Inst, archeol. i. p. 63. Rech. sur les mon. Cycl. et desor. de la coll. des modules en relief composant la galerie Pelasg. de la bibl. Mazarine par Petit-Radel, publi6es d'aprfes les MSS. de I'auteur. P. 1841. 8vo.] Squire in Walpole's Memoirs, p. 315. Leake, Morea, T. ii. p. 349, 368, 377, &c. Hirt in Wolf's Analecta, v. i. p. 163. Gesoh. der Baukunst Bd. i. s. 195. pi. 7. — With regard to those of Italy, §. 166. Sacreduess of building with d^yoi 7i/9o; in altars. In like manner Exod. xx. 25. Deut. xxvii. 6. 1 47. The taste for magnificence which manifested itself in the erection of these walls, was also displayed in the con struction of the extensive and spacious palaces of the princes 2 in the heroic times [jdaaikiia in Pausanias] which were built 3 for the most part on the acropoleis; it was here united with a great_ love for bright metal ornaments — a characteristic fea ture in the architecture of the heroic times. 2. Homer's description of Odysseus' palace is certainly correct as a general poetical picture. Comp. Voss, Homer, v. iv. pi. 1, Plirt. i. p. 209, pi. 7. "E^Kos, xij-h'/i with altar of Zeif 'E?>c£?of, colonnades, xBovux against the house, -^^iSiuqov, large ftiyx^ou with rows of pillars, Sa}\a^o; or more secret chambers. The upper portion of the house for the women, the v-!r€iJoia, did not extend, like our stories, over the entire ground-floor. 'The house of Odysseus on the acropolis of Ithaca, discovered by Gell (Ithaca, p. 50 sq.) ; Goodisson, however, did not discover anything. Many iso lated buildings around. In Priam's house fifty ^^y^xfioi ^e^roh 7„'%io of the sons, opposite to them in the aula twelve riymi S«A. |. x. of the sons- in-law beside each other. II. vi. 243, [not less poetical invention, as may be seen from the mythic numbers, than in the palace of Alcinous]. 3. To7f S" ^j- ;iiaA;t£« ^h riiixsx, x^^xioi Is re oUoi Hesiod E. 152. X«.7ikov n (TTSfOTT^v xcti UfixTX yix-^surx xZ'Jooi r nhUr(>ov n xcti x^yu^ou ijS" ARCHITECTONICS. 23 £?J®«i»TOf. Od, iv. 72. Xa?\x6o; ,«£» yoij Tol)coi e^.nf^ci.'ixr h^cc x«i h^a If fiuxon j| owSou' ¦s-sji Ss S)^iy»6s Kuai/oia. ;,;fiJo-s(«; Ss S«g«( ttvkiuou lofcov hro; hqyou- x^yv^ioi ii trrx^fioi ku x^-yMt^ 'iirrxaxu ovi^, ajyiljeoi/ S' i(p' iive^^v^iou, X^vaim Ii Ko^iim, in the fairy palace of Alcinous, Od. vii. 86, i-hs(pxn6liroi lifioi in Asia, Eurip. Iph. Aul. 683. Comp. §. 48. Rem. 2. 3. §. 49, 2. 48. The most remarkable of these princely fabrics of the 1 heroic ages Avere the treasuries, dome -shaped buildings which seem to have been destined for the preservation of costly armour, goblets, and other family heir-looms {xii,u,nXia). Similar to these generally subterranean buildings were the 2 O'j8ot of many ancient temples, cellar-like and very massive constructions, which likewise served in an especial manner for the preservation of valuable property. Finally, corresponding 3 forms were not unfrequently given to the thalami, secret chambers for the women, and even to the prisons of that early period. 1. Thesaurus of Mintas (Paus, ix, 38. Squire in Walpole's Memoirs, p. 336. DodweU i. p. 227) of white marble, 70 feet in diameter. Views, pi. 13; — of Atreus and his sons at Mycenae (Paus. ii, 16.), one of which was opened by Lord Elgin (s. Gell, Argolis, t. 4 — 6. Squire, p. 652. Dodwell ii. p. 236. Views, pi. 9, 10. Descr. de la Mor6e, ii, 66 sqq. Pouqueville iv. p. 162 ; above all Donaldson, Antiq. of Athens : Supplement, p. 25). Dia meter and height about 48 feet. The ruins of three others are to be seen there. Leake, Morea, ii. p 382 sqq. Views, pi. 11. [Comp. §.291 R. 5, and also Col. Mure on the royal tombs of the heroic age in the Rhein. Mus. 1838. vi. S. 240, who makes a striking comparison with the dungeon of Antigone in Sophocles, a fiuyif'Uo'j x,a.ra,ysioii according to Aristophanes of Byzantium in substance. Col. Leake, Peloponnesiaca, a supplem. 1846. p. 268, opposed to his view. But it receives a strong confirmation from a tomb at Caere, together with which Canina (Cere ant, tv. 3 — 5. 9) also gives a representation of that at Mycense, see p. 94, also Em. Braun, Bull. 1836, p. 67. 68. 1838. p. 173, and Abeken, Bull. 1841. p. 41, and MitteHtalieu s. 234.] — of Hyrieus and Augeas built by the Minyans Trophonius and Agamedes (Orchomenus, p. 95. Comp. the Cyolian Bugammon in Proclus). — Thesaurus (of Menelaus) discovered by Gropius not far from Amyclse ; [W. Mure, Tour in Greece, ii, 246, Tomb of Menelaus, who was buried according to tradition at Amyclse, or of Amyclas, of the ancient Amy- clseean kings :] traces at Pharsalus. Autolycus, son of Dsedalion (the In genious), wXelsTx xXiTrrau i^naxu^il^si/, Pherecyd. Fragm. 18 st. Od. xix,410. 2. OySo'f) foundation, socle, hence household, but also a subterranean repository ; the XaiVoj ouio; at Delphi was a thesaurus, II. ix, 404, which the Minyan architects are said to have built with Cyclopean masses of rock (Hymn to the Pyth. Ap. 115. Staph. B. s. v. A5A(pt>/). [It is stated by others as well as L. Ross in his ''Eyx^i^iii'"', §. 67, 2, that this is not cor rect.] Even the ;i(;«Ax£Of oiSoV of Colonos in Sophocles is also conceived as a walled abyss (comp. II. viii, 15. Theog. 811. l6ft.aio tqsis a-ivroi with treasures, H. in Merc. 247). The u-^6^ocpos Sid>^xfios of Odysseus, Menelaus, Priam, placed deep in the earth and filled with all sorts of valuable things (Od. ii, 337. xv, 98. xxi, 8. II. vi, 288), is also a sort of thesaurus. Ac cording to Burip. Hecabe 1010, a treasury at Ilium was indicated by a 24 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. I. black stone jutting out of the ground. Subterranean store-houses of fruits and other things were also everywhere common, as the arsi^oi for corn in Thrace, Philo Mathem. vett. p. 88. the favissse in Italy, the Aaxxo; for fruits, wine, and oil at Athens, the German cellars. Tacit. Germ. 16. Phry gians and Armenians even dwelt under the earth (Vitruv. ii. 1, 5. comp. Schol. Nicand. Alexiph. 7. Xenoph. Anab. iv, 5, 26, ar\iu/j,aTa, lacunaria). Byzes of Naxos invented the art of cutting mar- 2 ble tiles about the 50th Olympiad. 1. Pindar, 01. 13, 21, together with Bookh's Expl. p. 213, in regard to the eagle in the dirafix (comp. the coin of Perge, Mionnet, Desor. iii. p. 463). Welcker Rhein. Mus. II. s. 482. against the eagle. According to Pliny, xxxv, 12, 43, Dibutades was the plastes qui primus personas te- gidarum extremis imbricibus imposidt, comp. Hirt's Gesoh. der Baukunst, i. §. 227. — On the lacunaria, §. 283. In reference to these the Spartan asks the Corinthian, Do the trees with you grow four-cornered 1 Plut. Lye. 13. 2. On Byzes, Paus. v, 10. Regarding the skilful junction of the tiles, comp. Liv. xlii, 3. Among the important monuments of the Doric order at this time were the Herseum of Olympia (Hirt i. s. 228), said to have been built eight years before Oxylus (Paus. v, 16. comp. Photius lex. p. 194), and the He rseum of Samos, which formed an epoch, founded by Rhoecus and Theo dorus about the 40th Olympiad. Vitruv, vii. Prsef. comp. §. 80. Rem. 1, 3. Ruins. The small temple on Mount Ocha built of large blocks, with pyramidal door, without pillars, Hawkins in Walpole's Travels. [M. d. I. iii, 37. Annali xiv. p. 5. Bull. 1842. p. 169. Rhein. Mus. ii. s. 481. • An hypsethron, an opening in the roof which was of large stone-flags pushed over one another from all sides. Dodwell discovered more than one hieron in Cyclopean structures in Italy, especially at Cigliano, 50 feet long, of well cut irregular polygons, at MarceUina, at Golle Malatiscolo, Universel P. 1829. N. 170. Others later in the country of the iEquicoli, Bull. 1831. p. 45 sqq.] The Ruins of the temple (of Pallas Chalinitis?) at Corinth, the monolith pillars of limestone, Ii moduli high. Le Roy Mon. de la Grfece, P. i. p. 42. pi. 25. Stuart, Antiq. of Athens vol. iii. ch. 6. pi. 2. comp. Leake's Morea, T. iii. p. 245—268. Descr. de Moree, iii. pi, 77. 78. £A portion of the temples at Selinus appears to belong to this period. Thiersch. Epochen, S. 422 f.]— The small Doric temple of Neme sis at Rhamnus is here referred to, particularly on account of the walls of polygonal blocks. Uned. Antiq. of Attica, ch. 7. 54. Beside this Doric style of architecture the Ionic took 1 28 HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Per. I. its place, not gradually and by intermediate stages of transi tion, but all at once as an essentially different order. The columns had here from the first much more slender and less tapering shafts which were raised upon bases. The orna mented form of the capitals with their projecting portions (the volutes) cannot be deduced from the necessary and use ful. The entablature retained only the general divisions of the Doric, and relinquished the closer relations to wooden building; it is, in conformity with the more slender and widely placed supports, much lighter and presents less simple masses than the Doric. Everywhere prevail more rounded and as it were elastic forms (as in the bases and cushions), and more gentle transitions (as between frieze and cornice) where by the order receives a sprightlier grace without losing what is characteristic in the forms. The ornaments of individual members have been mostly discovered at Persepolis, (§. 244, 6,) [282. R. 5] and were perhaps widely diffused in Asia at an early period. 2. The columns in the temple of Ephesus were eight diameters high, Vitruv. iv, 1. 2—4, see §. 276—277. 3. The Ionic capital is an ornamented Doric, on the echinus of which a heading is placed composed of volutes, canal and cushions, which in a similar way is to be found on the upper border of altars, cippi, and mo numents, and may have perhaps derived its origin from the suspending of rams' horns. Comp. Hesych. s. v. k^io; — iA.i^a; n roi Ko^iu^iov xlouos (probably the volutes on it). As the ram was a customary off'ering to the dead, this agrees with the derivation of the Ionic order from grave-pil lars, in Stackelberg Apollot. s. 40 ff. R. Rochette, M. I. i. p. 141, 304, carried much too far by Carelli, Diss. eseg. int. all'origine ed al sistema della sacra Archit. presso i Greci. N. 1831. Volute capitals, am^oxiqix-Kau, Marm. Oxon. ii, 48, 19. Perhaps, therefore, in spiris columnarum in Pliny is to be referred to the volutes. Example of an Ionic column as a grave-pillar on Attic base, M. Pourtalfes pi. 26. Volute altars for in stance, Stackelberg Graber Tf. 18. The Old Ionic base akin to the Pe lasgian and Persian. Kugler s. 26. [E. Guhl Versuch ueber das lonische Kapital, Berl. 1846, from Crelles Journal fiir die Baukunst.] 55. The beginnings of this architecture are probably to be ascribed to very early times, as they are even to be found, out of Ionia, in the treasury of the Sicyonian tyrant Myron at Olympia, which was built soon after the 33d Olym piad; and at the commencement of the following period it at once unfolded itself in full splendour in the temple of Arte mis at Ephesus. In this thesaurus there were two thalami, the one of Doric and the other of Ionic architecture, and at least lined with brass, Paus. vi, 19, 1. The dome-shaped Skias of Theodorus the Samian at Sparta also de serves notice here, as one of the more remarkable buildings of the time Paus. iii, 12, 8. Btym. M. s. v. ^xixg. ' TECTONICS. 29 3. TECTONICS. 56. Even the period described by Homer attached great I weight to the rich and elegant workmanship of articles of fur niture and vessels, &:c. such as chairs, bedsteads, coffers, gob lets, cauldrons, and warlike weapons. With regard to wooden 2 utensils these were hewn out of the rough block with an axe {riKrahiiv, mXir.i7v), then carefully wrought with finer instru ments (j££/v), and afterwards ornaments of gold, silver, ivory or amber were inlaid in bored and depressed portions {hmZv Ixi- (pavri Kal dj/igijj, baibaXKuv). [bimvv is to turn, the fixing on of turned pieces gives the variegated effect] 2. See the description of Odysseus' bed, Od. xxiii, 196 (Comp. II. iii, 391), of the chair which the Tix.rav Icmalius made for Penelope, Od. xix, 56, also the xfi>^k xxX'^, S«/S«7i£n in the tent of Achilles, II. xvi, 221, and that which Arete gave to Odysseus, Od. viii, 424. TixTxluBi:, also of ships, regarding the workmanship of which, comp. Od. v, 244; the Trojan T£XTO> ' A^fcoulirig is distinguished in this art (II. v, 60). AiyoHv signifies to work into a round shape, like -ro^noSu, comp. Schneider in the Lex. s. v. roqtva. Instruments mentioned in Homer : -KiT^ixvs, ox.i'jrx^mi/, x^iun, riprox, r^i'TTxaau (with frame, Od. ix, 383. Eurip. Cycl. 460), arx^^n.—lYovy was used on keys, reins, scabbards, (xoXeoV jsottj/o-tou i-kicpxime, Od. viii, 404. comp. T^iaroi) i-Kiipxurog, Od. xviii, 195 ; xix, 664.) and amber on walls and furniture (Bernstein, Buttmann in the Schr. der Berl. Acad. 1818-19. Hist. 01. s. 38). [Mythologus Bd. ii. s. 337. Comp. Phoenician art, §. 239.] 5 7. This inlaid work in wood also continued to be a favourite I art in post-Homeric ages, and, instead of mere ornaments, com positions with numerous figures were sculptured on wooden utensils. In this manner was the ark (Xa^i/af, ¦/.v^ix-ri) 2 adorned which the Cypselidae as tyrants of wealthy Corinth sent as an offering to Olympia. 2. Dio Chrysost. xi. p. 325. Reisk. ii; xino; sa^xx-iis iinu in ' O'kufi'urix, ill T^ o-Trttr^oiofi^ rov viu r^g "Hg«f ii'TTofAvrift^x rvig xfi'Trxyvjg ixetyyjg, in rri lux/i/jj Ki^crru rfi di/xTi^iiayi vto Kv^iTO^m. It stood in the Herseum at Olympia, was made of cedar-wood, of considerable size, probably ellipti cal, as Pausanias says nothing of diff'erent sides, and T^xqvx^ applied to Deucalion's and other ships entitles us to suppose such a form. The figures were partly wrought out of the wood, partly inlaid with gold and ivory, in five stripes one above another (pjji^a/), the first, third and fifth of which Pausanias describes as he went round, from right to left, and the second and fourth from left to right. They contain scenes from the heroic mythi, partly referring to the ancestors of Cypselus who came from Thessaly, comp. §. 65, 3. Pausanias, who believes the fables told regarding this chest, imagines it to have been made about the lOth Olympiad, and supposes Eumelus to have been the author of the inscrip tions; but Hercules had here his ordinary accoutrements (Paus. v, 17. ex.) which he did not receive till after the 30th Olympiad, §. 77, 1. On the inscriptions, Volkel Archseol. Nachlass. i. s. 158. — Heyne ueber den 30 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. I. Kasten des Kypselos; eine Vorlesung 1770. Descrizione della Cassa di Cipselo da Seb. Ciampi. Pisa 1814. Quatremfere-de-Quincy, Jup. Olymp. p. 124. Welcker's Zeitsclirift fiir Gesch. und Ausleg. der Kunst. Th. i. s. 270 ff. Siebelis, Amalthea ii. s. 257. Thiersch Epochen, s. 169. (1829.) [0. Jahn Archaol. Aufs. s. 3. H. Brunn in the Rhein. Mus. v. s. 321. 355 ff.] I 58. With regard to articles of metal, such as Hephaestus, the patron of all smiths {x"-X-A.iK), manufactured in highest perfection. Homer celebrates cauldrons, goblets, tripods, cups, coats of mail, and shields, as partly of native and partly of 2 foreign workmanship. Besides these there are mentioned a great number of metallic and other shining articles which it was the custom to dispose in such a way as to produce a striking effect. 1. Tripods of Hephsestus, II. xviii, 374, and elsewhere. Nestor's cup with two bottoms and four handles {oiixra), on which golden doves were fashioned, Asclepiades •yn^l Nsffrog/Sof, Amalthea iii. s. 25. The Cyprian coat of mail (on which were xvxusoi i^axoursg I'^taffiu iotxorsg), the shield with a Gorgoneion, and the rest of Agamemnon's armour, II. xi, 17 sqq. Shield of .^neas, II. xx, 270. An Egyptian spinning basket, Od. iv, 126. Sidonian craters, II. xxiii, 743. Od. iv, 616. [Comp. §. 240, 4.] Laerces, a x'^Xxsug and x^vaoxoog, gilds the horns of the buUs, Od, iii, 425. 2, Metals. Brass, also iron ( ihxhi AxxrvXoi ev^au iv oi^tltim i/xTrxig loeurx trliio^ou, ig ttvq r ^ueyxxu xxi x^iTT^iTrig 'i^yov ihn^xv, Phoronis), gold, sUvsr, xxaairtqog (probably tin, Latin& plumbum album, Beckmann, Gesch. der Erfindungen iv. p. 327 sqq.) lead, x-iiaj/oj (a metallic stuff of dark blue colour), rirxuog (gypsum) on the shield of Hercules in Hesiod. Comp. MiUin, Mineralogie Hom6rique, (2 6d. 1816.) p. 65 seq. Kopke, Krieg- swesen der Griechen im Heroischen Zeitalter, p. 39. On the instruments oixf^cov (dxf/,69sir(iu), pxtarv}^, a(pv^x, Trvf^xy^x, the (pvffxi (dxpo(pvtitoif\ x^^^ot, Millin p. 85. Clarac Mus^e de Sculpt, i. p. 6 seq. I 59. On one of these works of art, the Hephsestian shield of Achilles, Homer even describes large compositions of nu merous figures ; but the very extent and copiousness of such re presentations, and the little regard that is therein had to what is really susceptible of representation, preclude the idea that he describes human works of similar compass, although indeed it must also be admitted that the working of figures of small 2 size on metal plates was a thing not unheard of. Here the mode of proceeding could have been no other than this ; the metal, after being softened and hammered into plates, was wrought with sharp instruments, and then fastened to the ground with nails, studs, or the like. 1. Restorations of the shield of Achilles were attempted some time ago by Boivin and Caylus, and more recently by QuatremSre-de-Quincy, Jupiter Olymp. p. 64, M6m. de I'lnstitut Royal, t. iv. p. 102. [Recueil de Dissert. 1817.] and Plaxman for a new silver-work. Comp. Welcker Zeitschr. i. p. 663. ad Philostr. p. 631. [Nauwerk, der Schild des Ach. in WORKS IN METAL. 31 neun Darstell. Berlin 1840. Programme on the same by D. Lucas, Em merich 1842, Marx at Coesfeld 1843, Clemens at Bonn 1844. Comp. H. Brunn in the Rhein. Mus. v. S. 340. On the Hesiodio shield K. Lehrs in Jahns Jahrb. 1840. S. 269 ff.] 2. On the smelting of metal, II. xviii, 468. Hes. Theog. 862 ; comp. Schneider s. v. xo«>«- But works of cast-metal are later as well as the art of soldering. All earlier works were beaten with the hammer (crcpv^ri'f^xrx), and the joinings effected by mechanical means, im/^oi (II. xviii, 379), ^tkk (H. xi, 634), tts^ovxi, xin^«, (Paus. x, 16, 1), ^schylus' Seven 625 sqq. iv x^'^xYikxrt^ axxn — 1(piyy uj^oairov 'Tr^og^Ef.iyixxvsvfAevyiv y6fi(pois — \xfix^ov h-x^ovtrrov ^ifixg. The fastening of metal ornaments on a ground (for example, even the studding of sceptres with golden nails) is the ifi-!ea.i(r7ixi\ Tix,vn. See Lobeok on Soph. Ajax, v. 846, p. 367. Athenseus xii. p. 543 sq. axi'Truvt x^^^°^^ ihtxxg i^A'^sirxifffciva. 60. Working in vessels was brought to much perfection after the Homeric times by means of two great inventions ; first that of casting in moulds, which is ascribed to a Samian master Rhoecus, son of Phileas, and his son Theodorus, [not traceable among the Phoenicians, §. 240, 3,] and was no doubt of great advantage to them in the making of craters and other vessels, in which those artists were distinguished. The history of the ancient Samian School of Artists is very difficult even after Thiersch, Epochen p. 181 (who distinguishes two Theodorus and two Telecles), Hirt, Amalth. i. p. 266 (who rejects both distinctions), Meyer Kunstgesch. Anm. p. 26, Sillig in Cat. Art. s. w. Rh(£cus, Telecles, Theodorus, Panofka, Sam. p, 51, with the last of whom what follows most nearly agrees. On this point these testimonies are in accordance with each other, viz. Herod, i, 61. iii, 41, 60. Diodor. i. 98. Vitruv. Prsef. vii. Plin. vii, 67. xxxiv, 8, 19, 22. xxxv, 12, 43. xxxvi, 13, 19, 3. Paus. iii. 12, 8. viii, 14, 5. x, 38, 3. Amyntas in Athen. xii, 514 F. Diogen. L. ii, 8, 19 ; only that the history of the Bphesian temple §. 80, Rem. 1. will not allow us, with some in Pliny, to place Rhoecus and Theo dorus long before the 30th Olympiad. The following is the greatest possible extension of the genealogy : Olymp. 35. Rhoecus, son of Phileas, the first architect of the enormous Herseum (Samos therefore was already very rich and powerful ; it got its first triremes in the 18th Olympiad ; its power seems to have increased particularly about the 30th Olympiad), employed on the Lemnian la byrinth. Invented metal-casting. I . 01. 45. Theodorus employed on Tbiecles worked m the Herseum, as well as on conjunction with the labyrinth. Builder of his brother. the Skias, laid the founda tions of the Artemisium at Ephesus. Was the reputed inventor of the norma, li- beUa, tornus, clavis. Casts statues from iron. 32 HISTORY OP GREEK ART. [Per. I. 01. 55. Theodorus, no longer architect, merely a worker in metals, made for Croesus (between 66th and 58th 01.) a large silver crater, enchased the ring of Polycrates, and made a golden ring which was to be seen in the palace of the Persian kings. Probably to the works of this school belonged even the brazen caul dron which the Samians on their return from Tartessus dedicated in the Herseum about the 37th 01. with the heads of griffins in alto-relievo on the rim, and three kneeling figures seven cubits high as feet. Herod. iv, 162. 61. Secondly. By means of the art of soldering {-KoXXrien, ferruminatio), i. e. a chemical junction of metals, in which Glaucus of Chios, a contemporary of Halyattes (40, 4 — 55, 1.) and probably a scholar of the Samian brass-caster, acquired fame, and in like manner proved his skill by ingeniously wrought vessels — especially the stand of a crater at Delphi. Of Chios according to Herod. Paus. ifcc, of Samos according to Steph. Byz. s. V. Aiiia.'hn. See Sillig s. v. Olaucus, with the scholia to Plato, Phsed. p. 108, 1 8. Bekk. and Heindprf p, 225. The xiTChwg aHii^ov is mentioned in particular as his exclusive invention ; that it is soldering there can be no doubt from the very clear description of the v^wox^irt-n^^tovy Paus. X, 16, 1. But Glaucus was likewise admired for the art of harden ing and softening iron (ff/Sijgoi/ nro/aaaig xxi fixhx^ig). Plut. de def. or. 47. comp. Ramshorn de Statuar. in Grsecia Multitud. p. 19 sqq. On the art of soldering, Fea on Winckelm. v. 429 Dresden. ' 'R'wirnxrog xjarsj^ C. I. i. p. 236. 62. A third handicraft which, on account of the plainness of the vessels which, taken by itself, it produces, has been less noticed than it deserved to be, from its connexion with the plastic art, — is that of pottery, xi^a/j^svriK'^. It flourished as an important trade especially at Corinth, .Sigina, Samos, and Athens, where the potters from an early period formed a con siderable portion of the population. Homer describes (II. xviii, 600,) the potter's wheel, the pretty poem Kx//,ivog i) Ke^xfilg, the furnace which Athena protects and many hostile demons threaten. Tqoxog of Talus. The handicraft was early exercised at Corinth (Hyperbius, Dibutades, v. Bockh ad Pind. 01. xiii, 27) ; in jEgina (^ginet. p. 79, also Pollux vii, 197. Hesych. and Phot. s. v.'Hxa mr^xix) ; in Samos (Samia terra, vasa, Panofka Sam. p. 16) ; at Athens (Cerameicus, a quarter of the city and suburb) ; Athena, Hephsestus and Prometheus, the patrons of the handicraft. Coraebus was said to have erected the first workshops, and Hyperbius and Buryalus (Agrolas in Paus.), according to Pliny, the first brick- walls ; the earth of Colias was an excellent material ; oil-jars were prizes at the PanatheuEea, hence the amphora on coins ; the .potters' market held especially at the festival of the wine-filling, iv ro~ig Xomi. According to Scylax p. 54, Huds. the POTTERY. 33 Phoenicians shipped Attic earthenware as far as Kerne. Comp. Valcke- naer ad Herod, v. 88, and Wien. Jahrb. xxxviii. p. 272). 63. As the potters in these officince sought to refine their 1 materials, which nature presented to them of excellent quality, and to give them additional beauty by mixing them, especially with ruddle ; so also do we find elegant forms in the oldest 2 vases of Greek manufacture, and the skill of the plastes, in the primitive sense of the word, is displayed in the ears, handles, and other parts added at will. On the fine clay mixed with sand which is found in Greece, Due de Luynes De la Poterie Antique. Ann. d. Inst. iv. p. 138. Dibutadis in- ventum est, rubricam addere, aut ex rubrica cretam fingere, [Cod. Bam berg and Isidor. xx, 4, 3, ex rubra creta], Plin. The earth of Colias made an excellent mixture with ^iT^rog, Suidas s. v. Kay^ixiog xe^x/xijec. 4. FORMATIVE ART. 64. The Homeric poems and the mythic accounts which ' have come to us in other ways agree in this, that no statues were known to early Greece except images of the Gods.* And '¦ although sculptures adorning vessels and architectural monu ments soon made their appearance, a round figure standing by itself, and which was not a religious idol, seems to have re mained for a long time unknown in Greece. 1. The golden handmaids of Hephsestus, the golden torch-bearers, and gold and silver dogs which Hephsestus gave to Alcinous to guard his house, can hardly refer to anything real. [A golden dog in the temenos of Zeus in Crete, Anton. Lib. 36, an imitation of the actual watching of temple gates, for example on Mount Bryx, on the Capitol ; the golden lychnuchi are an imitation of the real, Odyss. vii, 91, the simplest in vention for candelabra, which is repeated in angels for torch-bearers, by a contemporary of Lor. Ghiberti (Boisseree Gesch. des Doms zu Coin S. 13) and as is said by Mich. Angelo, a very beautiful work in a church at Florence. The candelabrum of very antique style from Vulci, Cab. Pourtalfes pi. 40. p. 112. is after the same idea.] The passage in the Iliad xviii 590, is with several ancient interpreters to be understood thus : that Hephsestus formed on the -shield a dancing place, an orchestra, similar to that which Daedalus constructed at Cnossus for Ariadne (who according to the Cretan custom danced with youths). This is the funda mental signification of xo?^i> comp. II. iii, 394. Od. viii, 260, together with Bust. ; if we adhere to it all difficulties are removed. The later Cretans indeed understood the passage otherwise, Paus. ix, 40 ; also the younger Philostr. 10. [The antique pedestal of Clitias at Florence (Bul lett. 1845. No. 7.) presents the choir of Dsedalus in 7 pairs, certainly according to the meaning of the poet. See Rhein. Mus. ii. S. 484.] 2. The Cyclopean lions on the gate of Mycense (comp. the legend of the walls of Sardis, Herod, i, 84), are a very remarkable work of architec- C 34 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. I. tonic sculpture, of green marble, Dodwell ii. p. 239. in a rude indeed, but simple and natural style. Paus. ii, 16, 4. W. Gell Argol. pi. 8—10. D. A. K. pi. 1, 1. Specimens ii, 3. Descr. de la Moree ii, 60. The Egyptian, Klenze Aphorist. Bem. S. 536 similar. Rather pointing to Persia, Phoe nicia and Lydia. [The green marble is only assumed for the sake of the Egyptian hypothesis, very boldly, for the stone is the same as what was quarried quite in the neighbourhood, only it was carefully selected. See also besides Gottling on the gate of Mycense in the Rhein. Mus. i. S. 161. W. Mure, Tour in Greece, ii. p. 167 sqq. Annali d. I. archeol. xvii. p. 168. Sufficiently remarkable also is the figure at Sipylos, three leagues from Magnesia, which is hewn out of the rock in alto relievo on a depressed ground, and which was recognised as Niobe by Ohishull and given as such by Steuart. PI. i. (§. 241*. R. 3). MacFarlane also, Constantinople in 1828, L. 1829. gave a drawing on shadow p. 159, but imagined it to be Cybele, which is a mistake, see BuU. 1843, p. 66. Pausanias visited this Niobe i, 21, 5, and mentions viii, 2, 3. the fable of its weeping in summer, which is even referred to in the Iliad. There is a large cleft in the rocky precipice which is nearly perpendicular, and water issuing from it trickles down upon the figure. It is in a sitting posture, with the hands placed over one another, and the head a little inclined to one side, both suitable to the expression of grief. Mr. Steuart expressly confirms what Pausanias alludes to, viz, that when you go up quite near, you can perceive no trace of the chisel, whereas you can from below, as Mr. MacFarlane states, distinctly see the statue, which is three times the natural size, from a considerable distance, although it is about 200 feet from the ground.] The taste for animal figures and monsters in decoration, manifested itsehf very early in works of art of the most different kinds. Comp. §. 75, 2 ; 434, 1. 65. Leaving out of consideration the external circum stances, dependent on defective technical knowledge, which opposed great obstacles to the development of sculpture, it was the entire character of their fancy, in so far as it occu pied itself with the life of gods and heroes, which at that period impeded its cultivation among the Greeks. The fancy of the Greeks, such as it presents itself in epic poetry, was still so much busied in depicting the wonderful and gigantic, the conceptions of the gods had yet attained so little sen sible distinctness, that poetry must have been much better adapted to the representation of them than sculpture. In the plastic art of this period grotesque representations of forms of terror (such as the Gorgoneion) occupied a considerable rank; by these was art, still in a state of rudeness, first en abled to excite interest. 2. The plastic talent which creates material forms cannot certainly fail to be recognised even as early as Homer : but it was only by means of epic poetry that it was gradually developed.— The forms of the gods are gigantic ; their appearances not unfrequently spectral ; the shapes in which they present themselves cannot in many cases be conceived in a definite manner. The epithets are for the most part less plastic than significant.- In the m?o(po7rig 'E^ivig, in the Harpies floating along in the EARLIEST IDOLS. 35 wind, we must not call up to our imaginations the later forms of art. The deeds likewise of the heroes are often unplastic, above all, those of Achilles. Homer has no touches borrowed from works of art, like later poets. Herein probably lies the cause of the remarkable phenomenon that the sculptures adorning the shield of Achilles and elsewhere in Homer never contain mythic subjects, but such as are taken from civil and rural Ufe (a circumstance overlooked by those who explained the two cities to be Eleusis and Athens), excepting perhaps the two figures of Ares and Athena, altogether of gold, and towering over the people (for Eris and Kudoimos metamorphosed themselves into human shapes). The shield of Hercules, although in part more rudely conceived and more fantastically decorated, yet in many points comes much nearer to actual works of art, especially to the ancient vase paintings, as well as the coff'er of Cypselus, as in the dragon-form in the middle, Ker, the battle with the Centaurs, Perseus and the Gorgons, the boars and Hons. The further development of what is said respecting the shield of Hercules, I have given in Zimmermann's Zeitschr. f, Alterthumswiss. 1834. N. 110 ff". Comp. §. 345-**. R. 6. 3. The Gorgon mask already floated before Homer and Hesiod from sculpture, such as the Cyclopean Gorgoneion at Argos (Paus. ii, 20, 6) to which many representations on ancient coins, vases and reliefs may come pretty near. See Levezow Ueber die Entwickelung des Gorgonen-Ideal. B. 1833. S. 25 f. §. 397, 5, contested by Due de Luynes, Ann. d. Inst. vi. p. 311. Similar in kind was the terrific form of the dragon {i^xxovrog i^«t(t«() [this word generally misunderstood] at Olympia since the 7th 01, Gymnastics fiourished in an especial man ner at Sparta (chiefly 20 — 50), in iBgina (45 — 80), with great splendour at Crotona (60 — 75). In the time of Thaletas, Sacadas, t.iv, xxrx'TT'h.Yj^iv "S £;^oy rviv rijg olxohof^ixg i/'TToy^xip^v, yevo/xivov ^ xv /SiT^ritrrov ei'-Tfe^ frvvirihia^Yi. Dicsearch. p. 8. Huds. Comp. the HaU. Bncycl. Athens, p. 233. Hirt, Gesch. i. 226. — The Pythion of the Pisistratidse. Perhaps also the elder Parthenon. 5. Temple of Delphi after the conflagration 01. 58, 1, built by Spin- tharus the Corinthian. (The Amphiotyons gave the building out on contract ; the Delphians contributed a fourth and collected everywhere for it ; the AIcmaBonidse undertook it for 300 talents, but carried it on in a much more splendid style, Herod, ii, 180. v, 62, <.s Attic masters about the 75th Olympiad. However, this very severity of design led to that fidelity to nature which is in most particulars so much admired in the .ffigina marbles. 4 With this force of design are usually combined short and com pact proportions, although an excessive lengthening of the figures is not unseldom to be found, more however in paint- 5 ings than sculptures. The gestures have often something e STYLE OF THE FORMATIVE ART. 50 violent (a tendency which was very much favoured by the fre quent representation of mythological battle scenes), but even where there is great animation there is still a certain stiff ness, something abrupt and angular. 2. Duriora et Tuscanicis proxima CaUon atque Hegesias, Quintil. Inst, xii, 10. Canachi rigidiora quam ut imitentur veritatem, Cic. Brut. 18, 70. Oix rd T^f ¦jra.T^xiag i^yxsixg iari ' "Hymiov xxi rav xft(pl K^nixv rou N>]o'/6JT>j!', xTia^iyftivx (adstricta) xxi vsv^uiri xxi trxXvj^d xxi dx^ifiag d'jrarirxfiivx ralg y^xfiftalg. Lucian Prsec. Rhet. 9. Demetr. De Elocut. §. 14, says that the earlier rhetorical style was unperiodic, but Tri^is^ea- fiivog, Uke the ancient dyxT^fixrx, whose rixvn was avaroT^ri xxi inxviryig. 3. With such a truth to nature as excites our wonder, there are united in the .^gina marbles many singularities, such as the prominence given to the cartilage of the breast, the peculiar intersection of the mus- culus rectus, and the peaked form of the knee which is also much bent. Wagner (§. 90.) p. 96. The Hermes xyo^xlog erected about the 64th Olym piad seems to have possessed equal merit as regards fideUty to nature, and was even in the time of Lucian (Zeus Tragod. 33) a study for brass- casters. Wiener Jahrb. xxxviii. p. 282. 4. Short proportions, especiaUy in the SeUnuntine metopes (the draw ing of which is also determined by the endeavour to exhibit every part of the body in the gteatest possible breadth). In the jEgina marbles the heads, especiaUy in the lower parts, are large, the breast long and broad, the waist short in proportion, and the thighs short compared with the legs. Other examples of short proportions §. 96. No. 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 16, 19. Comp. §. 99. No. 1, 2, 3, 6. Examples of slender 'Jiroportions §. 96. No. 20, 21, 23. Comp. §. 99. No. 4, 5, also 9, 10. 93. But that antique love of elegance is shown in the 1 neatly and regularly folded drapery (comp. §. 69) ; the curi ously braided or wire-like curling and symmetrically ar- 2 ranged hair ; then in the peculiar mode of holding the finger, 3 which always recurs in the grasping of sceptres, staffs and the like, and also, with female figures, in tucking up the garments ; • in the buoyant method of walking on the fore part of the 4 foot, and numerous other particularities. Of a kindred nature 3 is the demand for parallelism and symmetry in the grouping of a number of figures. 1. See §. 96. No. 5, 6, 7, 13, 14, 16, 17. Besides the stiff'ened and flat tened temple-drapery the taste of the age for elegant and many-folded garments must be taken into account. It prevailed chiefly in Ionia, and went out at Athens with the time of Pericles. Tirriyo(p6^oi, d^xxiu axrif^xrt -hxix-w^oi. The author's Minervse PoUadis sedis, p, 41 , 2. So in the .ffigina marbles (even in the pubes), comp. §. 96. No. 1, 7, 12, 14, 16. 17. This also was derived from the custom of higher and more poUshed Ufe at that time, and which was especiaUy observed and maintained at festivals. Asius ap. Athen. xii, 525 F. B«S/^£(» 'Hg«ioi/ ifiTri'jrXiyf/.ivov. ' A^nvx vx^x'TTi^'hiyfiivy). Pollux li, 35. 60 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. II. 3. See No. 14, 15, 16, 17, 21. They worshipped primore digito in erectum polUcem residente, Appul. Met. iv. p. 90, Bip. Offering-boxes, incense, ioy, Tv. 75. i. p. 127 sq. N. REMAINS OP THE PLASTIC ART. 63 Rhein. Mus. iv. s. 4. Tf. 1, Sch6U MittheU. Tf. 1, In SchoU. Tf. 2, 4. there is also the large reUef on the acropoUs of a female figure ascending a chariot, in which grace is remarkably combined with antiqueness. The bas-reUef Despuiges §. 364. R. 8 is far more antique. 20. Theft of the Tripod— a subject early cultivated (§. 89. Rem. 3), probably much employed at the consecration of tripods, which very often occurred at Delphi, Thebes and Athens. The base at Dresden, n. 99 (August. 6 — 7), can be best explained as the stand of a tripod which was won as a prize in an dyav Xxf/.Ttxiovx"?- The reUefs in Paciaudi, Mon. Pelop. i. p. 114 (from Laconia), carry us back to the same original. Mon. du. M. Napol. ii. pi. 35 (in the Louvre, n. 168. Clarac, pi. 119), Zo ega ii. tv. 66 (ViUa Albani). The subject was already treated in ancient vase-pictures in a more free and lively manner. Comp. especiaUy Fr. Passow in Bottiger's Archaol. und Kunst, i, s, 126, [In one only ; only in one reUef also on a sarcophagus at Cologne, Verein der Alterthums- freunde. Bonn 1846. vii. s, 94, where 46 monuments are coUected, to which others also wiU be added.] 21. ReconcUiation of Hercules, before whom advances Athena, and whom Alcmena (!) foUows, with the deities of Delphi, who are followed by Hermes and the Charites as the deities of peace and friendship, from the weU of a Corinthian temple {vi^iarofnov, puteal sigillatum) in the possession of Lord Guilford. DodweU, Alcuni Bassir. 2 — 4. Tour ii. p. 201. comp. Leake, Morea ui. p. 246. Gerhard, Ant. BUdwerke i. Tf 14 — 16 (Procession of the new-born Aphrodite to Olympus, also Welcker, Ann. d. Inst. ii. p. 328). Panofka, Ann. ii. tv. F. p. 146 (Marriage of Hercules and Hebe). — This Corinthian reUef treated in greatest detail by K. W. Bouterweck in Schorn's Kunstblatt, 1833, Nos. 96—99, who also endeavours to prove that it represents the introduction of Hercules to Olympus and his marriage with Hebe, [The author repeats the above explanation in the Dorians i. 431 and D, A. K, xi, 42, Gerhard his in the text to the Ant. BUdw, 2 Lief. 1844, s, 194—207, B, Braun also takes the representation to be a marriage scene, but as Her, and Hebe, in his Tages s, 10, and 0. Jahn agrees with him. Archaol. Aufs. s. 108. 110 — 113.] 22. Altar of the Twelve Gods from the Villa Borghese in the Louvre, No. 378, an exceUent work nobly conceived, and executed with extreme care and industry. Beneath the twelve deities are the Charites, Horse, and Moerse. Perhaps an imitation of the ^ufi,6g iulixx ^iZv of the Pisis tratidse about the 64th Olympiad. Visconti, Mon. Gabini, tv. agg. a. b. 0. Winckelm. W. iii. Tf. 7, 8, M. BouiU. ui, 66. Clarac, pi. 173, 174. SimUar groupings: the CapitoUan puteal with twelve deities, Winck elm. Mon. In. no. 5. M. Cap. iv. tb. 22. Winckel. W. iu. Tf. 4 ; the ara tonda of the Capitol with ApoUo, Artemis, Hermes, M. Cap, iv. tb, 66, Winckelm, W. iii, Tf 5 ; another from the Mus, of Cavaceppi with Zeus, Athena, Hera, Welcker's Zeitschrift i, ii, Tf. 3, n. 11. Comp. Zoega, Bassir. ii. tv. 100, 101. 23. Anathemata for victories in musical games in the most ornate hieratic style, Apollo, frequently accompanied by Leto and Artemis, as Pythian singers to the cithern, making libation after the victory ; a god dess of victory pouring out. Zoega, Bassir. ii. tv. 99 ; Mon. du M. Na pol. iv. pi. 7, 9, 10 (Clarac, pi. 120, 122) ; Marbles of the Brit. Mus. ii. 64 HISTORY OP GREEK ART. [Per. II, pi, 13. Fragment from the Elgin CoUection in the Brit, M. R. xv. 103 ; from Capri in Hadrava, tv. 4. As a frieze ornament in terracotta, Brit. M. no. 18. — ApoUo in the same costume singing a psean to the cithern, whose cords he grasps with the left {-^xKhii), and strikes at the same time with the plectron in the right {x^ixu) Mon. du M. Napol. iv. pi. 8 ; quite Uke the Samian bronze statue of BathyUus in the costume of ApoUo. Appul. Florid, p. 128. Bip. Anacreont. 29, 43. — Comp. Welcker, Ann. d. Inst. V, p, 147. [§. 361, 4.] 24. Sacrifice for a victory to Athena-Polias, who is clearly recognised by the guardian-serpent, oixov^og o(pis, in several reUefs, which — with a not unfrequent extension of the original signification — were placed on the cippi of warriors. Mon. du M, Napol, iv. pi. 11. Amalthea ui. s. 48. Comp. R. Rochette, Mon. In. i. p. 288, 426. Welcker, Ann. d. Inst. v. p. 162. This representation also on a marble discus M. Borbon. x. 11. The stele has the aphlaston. [AveUino Casa di Pompeji 1840. tav. 4. p. 57 — 80 whore the Salaminian victory of Ajax is indicated. Comp. Annali d. Inst. V. p. 162. R. Rochette Mon. Ined. p. 228. 426.] The following reliefs in particular may serve to present more clearly to view the transition from the old-Greek style to the improved style of the following period. 25. Hercules kneeling on the hind (Trxvrx viu^ahn). Combe, Marbles of the Brit. M. U. pi. 7. Specimens, pi. 11. The posture also remained nearly the same in later art. See Anthol, Pal, ii. p. 663, Plan, 96. [The fine group found in Pomp. pubUshed by Gaet. d'Ancora, N. 1805, 4to, and in the M, d. I, iv, 6, with a simUar one in marble, AnnaU xvi, p. 176 by H. KeU,] 26, Castor as horse-tamer with the Castorian dog from the Tibur- tine ViUa of Hadrian. Combe ii, pi. 6. Specimens, pi. 14. 27. Festal procession of a Satyr and three Maenads, in the ancient solemnity of style. Inscription : KxXkifixxog ii^oiti. M. Cap. iv. tb. 43. 28. Cippus with the figure of the deceased (as a ^511?) leaning upon a staff, giving a grasshopper to a dog, near Orchomenos. Clarke, Travels iu. p. 148. Dodwell, Tour i. p. 243. The figure in a relief at Naples from the grave of a Campanian named Meddix (according to the inscription) [The inscription does not belong to the stele, and is now even separated from it] is very similar, only it is clad in a shorter dress, and has an oil- vessel (xsjxu&of) suspended from the wrist as a symbol of gymnastics. R. Rochette, Mon. Ined. i. pi, 63. p. 261. Odysseus with the dog Argos ac cording to Welcker (as weU as R. Rochette and the Catal. del Mus. Bor bon.) Rhein. Mus. ui, 4. s. 611 [which is however an error. Mus, Borbon. xiv, 10]. Works of the hieratic style 'also in terracotta are much more common, and are undoubtedly genuine works of this period. 29. Those relief-figures are genuine antiques which were found at Melos, without a ground, probably from a votive shield, representing Perseus as slayer of the Gorgon, and BeUerophon as vanquisher of the ENGRAVING STONES AND DIES. 66 Chimsera. MilUngen, Un. Mon. Ser. ii. pi. 2, 3. [Also Alcseus and Sap pho in the Brit. Mus. stiU unpublished.] 30. Terracotta relief from Jigina, the Hyperborean Artemis riding with Eros in a chariot drawn by griffins. Welcker, Mon. In. d. Inst. tv. 18 b. Ann. ii. p. 66. THE ART OF ENGRAVING STONES AND DIES. 97. The arts of engraving precious stones and coin-stamps l gradually arose, as smaller and less regarded ramifications of the plastic art, into which life did not until late extend from the main branches. Both served as their first object the purposes of economy and traffic. The art of stone-engraving was occu- 2 pied with signet-rings, sipeayTbig, the demand for which was increased by the ancient practice of sealing up stores and trea sures, but was also partly satisfied by metal or even wooden 3 seals with devices of no significance. However, the art of working in hard and precious stones at a very early period advanced, after the example of the Phcenicio- Babylonian stone-cutters (§. 238, 240), from a rude cutting out of round holes to the careful engraving of entire figures in antique se vere style. 2. Regarding the sealing of rxfiiiix, Bottiger, Kunstmythol. S. 272. and elsewhere. On the old metal signet-rings, Atejus Capito ap. Macrob. Sat. vu, 13. Plin. xxxui, 4. On the ^^iirofi^oiroi, ^^mnlinroi (in part ac- tuaUy made from worm-eaten wood, and partly seals in imitation of it), see Sahnas. Exc. PUn, p, 653, b. It is doubtful whether the ring of Po lycrates was engraved. Strab. xiv. p. 638; Paus, viii, 14, 6, Clemens Protr. ui. p, 247. Sylb, for the affirmative. Plin, xxxvii, 4 distinctly op posed to that opinion: comp, Herod, iii, 41, acp^nylg x?"<'^^^'^os cfix^xyiou X('3oy ; Theodorus certainly did nothing more than erwhase it [si fabula vera]. According to Diog, Laert, i, 2, §, 57, it was a law of Solon : Ixx- rv7iioy'Aii(pm fj.'fi iifivxi a^^xyiix cpvT^xmiv roi T^x^ivrog ixxrvTiiov. The same writer, according to Hermippus, caUed the father of Pythagoras a S«xTi/X(oyAi/(pof (viii, 1), 3. On Scarabsei (§. 175. 230, 2) with figures, which almost entirely consist of round rudely formed holes placed close to one another, Meyer, Kunstgesch. i, s, 10. Tf 1. An excellent coUection, partly of this sort and partly of ancient and careful workmanship, but chiefly Etruscan, is furnished in the Impronti Gemmarii d. Inst. Cent. i. 1 — 50. iu, 1 — 55. See besides, Lippert, Dactyl. Ser. i. P. ii. n. 79, 496. ii, 1, 431. ii, 103. MiUin, Pierres Gravees In6d. 6, 7, 13, 26, 26, 60, 61. Specimens, p. Ixxxi. Comp. Lessing, Antiq. Briefe Th. i. s. 165, Facius, Misoellaneen zur Gesch. der Kunst, im Alterthum, iv, 2, s, 62 (where also are noticed the pretended (7(p^xy7ieg of mythology). Gurlitt, iiber die Gemmenkunde, Archseol. Schriften, s. 97 ff. Hirt, Amalthea ii. s, 12. D. A, K, Tf 16. 98. Coined silver money had even about the 8th Olym piad taken the place of the bar-money formerly used. It was 66 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. IL introduced by the Argive king Pheido, and ^gina became the first officina of coining. But for a long time they were satisfied with the simplest devices on the convex obverse of the coins, with rudely indicated tortoises (in .Slgina), shields (in Bceotia), bees (at Ephesus), and the like. On the flat re verse remained the impression of a projection {quadratum in- cusum) by which the coin was held fast while receiving the stamp. The heads of gods and complete figures first made their appearance at this period; and the depressed fields of the reverse became gradually filled with representations more and more ingenious; different schools of coining were devel oped, as in the characteristically but not elegantly designed numi incusi (with raised and at the same time depressed figures) of Lower Italy, and the coins of Macedonia and Chal- cidice which were executed in a very sharp style and with much delicacy of detail. 1. On Pheido and the ancient iEgina standard of money, the author's ^ginet. p. 51, 88. [Bockh's Metrologie s. 76.] 2. The most unshapely x^^'"'"^ of Mgrna. (in Mionnet's Empreintes, n. 616 sqq.) certainly reach very far back. Many of the Corinthian coins with the Pegasus and Koppa, and the Boeotian with the shield approach the same epoch. Levezow iiber mehrere im Grossherz, Posen gef uralte Griech, Munzen, B, 1834, 3, On the Attic coins in place of the rude Gorgoneion (comp, Cou- sinery, Voy, de la Maced, u. p. 119. pi. 4) came the head of Minerva with the antique and bizarre profile (Mionnet, Descr. pi. 41, 50, 54. Empr. 603, 4, 5), and the owl on the reverse, a type which continued for a long time. Coins of Athens in the imperial cabinet of coins, Weiner Jahrb. 1838. Ixxxii. s. 28. — The numi incusi (comp. StiegUtz, Archseol. Unter- haltungen ii. s, 64) of Sybaris, Siris, Poseidonia, Pandosia, Taras, Caulonia, Crotona, Metapontum, Pyxoeis, extend from about the 60th to the 80th 01, (Sybaris destroyed, 67, 3, Pyxoeis founded 77, 2, Siris conquered about 50, but Sirites continued to exist), Mionnet, Descr, pi. 58 — 60, Micali, ItaUa tv. 58, 60, MUlin, Mag, Bncycl, 1814, T, ii. p, 327,— Coins of Rhegium and Messana with the hare, and mules in harness (Mionnet, pi, 61, 5, Combe, M. Brit, tb, 3, 27), are of the time of AnaxUas (70— 76), Aristot, in PoUux v, 12, 75; others of Messana have the types of the Samians who had settled there (70, 4), Gott. G, A, 1830. s. 380. Elegantly executed old coins of Syracuse and Gela. [Coins with the head of Theron, probably after 01. 77 ; Visconti Iconogr, Gr. A. ii. p, 6 sq.]— The coins of Alexander I. (01. 70 to 79) which were imitated by the Bisaltse, are in a severe but very excellent style of art ; the old style appears very elegant on the coins of Acanthus, also of Monde. Lion and bull on coins of Acanthos explained from Herod, vii, 126. by Pinder, p. 20. But the Uon there only attacks camels. The Thasian coins (0A) with the satyr embracing the nymph (on others probably also from thence the satyr pursues the nymph) exhibit the art advancing from coarse caricature (comp. §. 75*) to the cultivation of elegant forms. At Lete in Mygdonia and Orrhescos in the same country these and other antique coins were PAINTING. 67 imitated in barbarian workmanship (with a centaur instead of the satyr). Mionnet, Descr. pi. 40, 44, 60. Suppl. u. p. 545. iii. pi. 6, 8. Cadalvfene Recueil de M6d. p. 76. Cousinery, Voy. dans la Mac6d. T. i. pi. 6, 7. Comp. Gott. 6. A. 1833. s. 1270. — The figures of animals and monstra especiaUy are also often very antique on the old gold staters of Asia Minor, of Phocsea, Clazomense, Samos, Lampsacus, Cyzicus. (The combination of Uon and buU on the Samian staters reminds one of oriental conjunc tions.) See Sestini, Descr. degU Stateri antichi. Firenze 1817, and in particular Mionnet, Suppl, v, pi. 2, 3. Comp, besides StiegUtz, Versuch einer Binrichtung antiker Miinzsammlungen zur Brlauterung der Ge schichte der Kunst. Leipz. 1809. D. A. K. Tf. 16, 17. 4. PAINTING. 99. At this period the art of painting, by means of Cimon 1 of Cleonse and others, made such progress, especially in the perspective treatment of subjects, as enabled it to appear in great perfection at the very beginning of the next period. Vase-painting, which had been introduced into Italy and 2 Sicily from its two metropolises Corinth and Athens, remained more restricted in its resources, so that the works especially of the Chalcidian Greeks in Lower Italy took Attic models as their ground-work both in subjects and forms. In the now 3 prevailing species with black figures on reddish-yellow clay were exhibited all the peculiarities of the old style : excessive prominence of the chief muscles and joints, stifily adhering or regularly folded drapery, constrained postures or abrupt movements of the body ; — but at the same time, owing to the facility of exercising this art, there were a great variety of manners belonging to particular places of manufacture, often with an intentional striving at the bizarre. 1. Cimon of Cleonse, PUn. xxxv, 34. M\. V. H. viii, 8 (on the con trary we must read Mixuv, [who improved on the invention of Bumarus §. 74] in Simonides, Anthol. Pal. ix. 758, also perhaps App. T. ii. p. 648), invented catagrapha, obliqum imagines, i. e, obUque views of figures, from the side, from above, from below ; and stimulated to more exact details in the body and drapery. That was a great picture which was dedicated by the architect Mandrocles in the Herseum — ^the bridge over the Bos porus and the passage of Darius (Herod, iv, 88). Pictures in Phocsea about the 60th 01, Herod, i. 164. Mimnes mentioned by Hipponax 01, 60, painted triremes [Aglaophon in Thasos, father and master of Polyg notus and Aristophon.] 2. It is proper to refer here to the question as to whether the great mass of the vases of Volci (respecting their discovery §, 267), which probably belong to the time between the 65th and 95th 01,, and by their subjects and inscriptions decidedly refer to Athens, were manufactured at Volci by Attic colonists or metoeci, or whether they came by means of commerce from Athens or a Chalcidian colony of Athens. Comp, MilUn- 68 HISTORY OP GREEK ART. [Per. H. gen. Trans, of the Roy. Soc, of Lit. u. 1. p, 76, Gerhard, Rapporto int, i Vasi Volcenti, Ann. d. Inst. ui. p. 1 (Mon. tv. 26, 27). Welcker, Rhem. Mus fiir Philol. I, ii. s. 301 (for the first view, which Gerhard supports, BuU 1834. p. 76).— R. Rochette, Journ. des Sav. 1831. P6vr. Mars. The author in Comment, Soc, Getting, vii, p, 77 (for the second as weU as Bun- sen AnnaU vi, p, 40, R, Rochette ibid, p, 285, Journ, des Sav. 1837, p. 486 for importation. Gerhard gives up the Tyrrhenian species as such, Ann. ix. p. 136, but supports their ItaUan origin, p. 140). Comp._ below No. 13. As to the imitation of Athenian vase-paintings in Chalcidian Nola, Bockh has brought to Ught a remarkable instance, Procem. Lect. Hiem. 1831. 3. Among the great host of antique vase-pictures we here select some of particular interest which belong to the different manners which were developed in Greece itself There is an entire series of these with figures in shadow. Stackelb, Tf 10—15. [The greatest and most remark able of aU vases of the earlier times is that discovered by Alessandro Francois in 1845 in the district of Chiusi, painted by Clitias, made by the potter Ergotimus, with a cyclus of important compositions probably grouped under a particular point of view, with 115 names of persons re presented. An introductory account given by B. Braun Allegem. Zeit. 1845. s. 1379. BuU. 1845. p. 113, and Gerhard ibid. p. 210, and Archaol. Zeit. 1846. s. 319.] No. 1. The Attic prize-vase, TON AeENE0[E]N AOAON EMI, in the possession of Mr. Burgon (MiUingen, Un. Mon. S. i. pi. 1—3. comp. C. I. n. 33, and p. 450), representing Athena as promachos, and a con queror in a chariot race with xivr^ov and /xxirri^. A Panathenaic vase from .a)gina, BuU, 1830, p, 193, 1831, p. 95, one from Cyrene AnnaU vi, p. 2873, [A host of such vases M, d, I, i. tv, 22, Gerhard Etr. u. Cam- panisohe Vasen Tf A. B,] The numerous amphorse with different gym nic and equestrian contests, also a cithern-singer from Volci, are in a more elegant style and evidently merely vases for show, (Gerhard, Ann, d. Inst. ii, p. 209, Ambrosch, ibid, v, p. 64. Mon. 21, 22), as weU as some found in Magna Grecia (the KoUer vase at Berlin, in Gerhard, Ant. Bildw. i. Tf. 5 — 7 ; iyixg iy^a\j/i vixs b. Stackelb. Tf 26, the only example from Athens; a peculiar style of painting, with short stiff figures, from a smaU Athen ian tripod ; tKe Lamberg vase at Vienna, the least antique, in Laborde i. 73, 74 ; comp. Panofka, M. Bartoldiano, p. 65 sqq.). On the destination of these vases, Brondsted, Trans, of the Roy. Soc. II. i. p. 102. 2. Vase with the slaying of the Minotaur, in a stiff antique style ; the female figures with drapery checked in different colours and without folds. Work of the potter Taleidas ; found in Sicily, but probably of the Attic school, as the subject is presented exactly in the same way on an Attic vase in the possession of Mr. Burgon. Most accurately given in Maisonneuve, Introd. pi. 38. [Gerhard Auserl. Vasen i. Tf 1 — 4.] 3. Birth of Pallas in a style very similar to that of the preceding vase. From Volci, where there were a great number of the kind. MicaU, Ant. popoli Italian!, Monum. tv. 80, 2. [Gerhard Auserl. Vasen. i. Tf. 1 — 4.] 4. Vase with boar-hunt by a hero Antiphatas, a prize for a victory in the horse-race, from a tomb near Capua with Dorian inscriptions. Very symmetrical arrangement of the figures, Hancarville, Antiq. Etr. Grec. et Rom. i. pi. 1 — 4. Maisonneuve, Introduction, pi. 27. PAINTING. 69 5. Hermes with the three goddesses hastening to Paris, as on the coffer of Cypselus, Paus. v, 19, 1. Similar to the preceding vase: paral lel direction of the limbs ; regularly folded drapery, slender proportions. MilUngen, Coll. de CoghiU, pi. 34. 6. Hercules with the lion's hide, but at the same time a Boeotian shield, violently springing upon Cycnus (comp. the statue on the Amy clsean throne, Paus. iii, 18), in i\Iillingen, Un. Mon. S. i. pi. 38. 7. AchiUes dragging the body of Hector (in gigantic form) behind his chariot, often on SiciUan vases, in R. Rochette, Mon. In. i. pi. 17, 18. On a simUar one at Canino the small winged figure of a hero represents the eidolon of Patroclus, R. Rochette, p. 220. 8. Departure of Eriphyle from Amphiaraus and Adrastus, two groups on a Magna Grecian vase. Sootti, lUustrazioni di un vaso Italo Greco. N. 1811. 4to. [MiUingen Peint. de Vases, pi. 20, 21. The author's D. A. K. Denkm. i. Tf. 19, 98. Minervini in the BuUett. Nap. ii. p. 122. iii. p. 48, 52. 0. Jahn Archteol. Aufs. S. 139 f] 9. Memnon overcome by Achilles and carried away by Eos, two groups on an Agrigentine vase (but with Attic inscription) of powerful and finished design, MilUngen, Un. Mon, i, pi, 4, 5, 10. Pyrrhus slaying young Astyanax before the waUs of Troy, at the altar of the Thymbrsean Apollo, on a Volcian vase, Mon, d, Inst. 34. Comp. Ambrosch, Ann. iii. p. 361. [young TroUus, Ann. v. p. 251 — 54. 0. Jahn Telephos and Troilos, S. 70.] 11. Athena, recognisable by her helmet and lance, sitting at the right hand of Zeus, with the thunderbolt ; before them two Horse, behind the throne Hermes and Dionysus, in a finished antique style such as prevails at Volci. Copied in colours (red and white) in MicaU tv. 81. 12. Dionysus in the ship of the Tyrrhene pirates (an ingenious and grandiose composition) on a cup from Volci, in the inside. On the out side of the rim combats around two fallen heroes. Inghirami, G. Omerica tv, 259, 260. [Gerhard Auserl. Vasen i. Tf. 49.] 13. Athenian virgins drawing water for the bridal bath from the fountain CaUirrhoe (KAAIPE KPENE, read KxXAipp^ K^iivn), from Volci. Brondsted, A brief descr. of thirty-two anc. Greek vases, n. 27. Comp. the marriage-vases for Lysippides and Rhodon in Pr. Lucian, Musee Btrusque n. 1547, 1548. 14. A traffic-scene, — sale of wool [Silphion] under the superintendence of a magistrate, with Doric inscriptions ( A^xeaiT^xg), on a vase from Etruria, in a bizarre style, not Attic. Mon. d. Inst. 47. Ann. v. p. 56. MicaU tv. 97. [Cab. Durand, no. 422. Panofka Bilder antiken Lebens Taf. xvi, 3. Inghirami Vasi fitt. tav. 260.] 70 HISTORY OP GREEK ART. [Per. III. THIRD PERIOD. 3 FROM THE 80th TO THE 111th OLYMPIAD (460—3/6 B. C), FROM PERICLES DOWN TO ALEXANDER. 1. THE EVENTS AND SPIRIT OF THE AGE IN RELATION TO ART. 1 100. The Persian wars awakened in Greece the slumber- 2 ing consciousness of national power. Athens was entirely fitted, by the character of the race to which its inhabitants belonged, to become the central point of Grecian civilization, and availed itself, with great skill, of the means which the 3 circumstances supplied; whereby it quickly arrived at such a degree of power as no other city ever possessed. 2. The Athenians were, in common with their kindred race, the lon ians of Asia, susceptible, Uvely, and fond of innovation, but combined with these qualities an energy which had there soon disappeared. To i^xffr^^iov, ro isivov. 3. The beginning of the palmier state of Athens is fixed by Herod, V, 78 as early as 01, 67, 4. Themistocles' popular decree for the expen diture of the silver of Laurion on the fleet, about 73, Battle of Salamis, 75, 1. The hegemonia of the Greeks who had been under the king fell to Athens for the Persian war, probably 77, 1, Aristides' reasonable taxa tion ; the treasury at Delos ; the sum of the yearly tributes, (po'go;, 460 talents (afterwards 600 and 1200), Pericles removed the treasure to Athens about 79, 3. From that time the aUies mostly became subjects, the aUiance-treasure a state-treasure. The highest amount of treasure before the Peloponnesian war was 9,700 talents, the yearly revenue at that time about 1,000. Bockh, Pub. Boon. p. 396 sqq. 433. Lewis. 1 101. The great riches which at this period flowed to Athens, whereof only a small portion was expended on the Persian war which was indolently carried on, were at first laid out principally in the fortification of the city, but after- 2 wards in adorning it in the most magnificent style with tem ples, and edifices for games. 1. The building of the waUs of the Peirseus was begun by Themisto cles in the time of the Archon Cebris before 01. 75 (according to Bockh De archont. pseudepon. 01. 72, 1), continued 75, 3. The rebuUding of Athens and the renovation of the walls 75, 2. About 01. 78, 4, Cimon caused the south side of the acropolis to be strengthened (Plut. Cim. 13. Nepos, Cim. 3), and the foundation of the long waUs to be laid, which Pericles completed 01. 80, 3, 4, but afterwards added another wall to them. On the three long walls, Leake's Topography by Rienseoker, Nachtr. s. 467. EVENTS AND SPIRIT OF THE AGE. 71 2. The Theseion was begun under Cimon, 01. 77, 4. About 01. 80, 3. the Athenians made a proposal for a renovation at the common expense of the temples destroyed by the Persians ; and about this time many temples were bmlt in Attica. The Parthenon completed 01. 85, 3. The Pro- pylsea built 86, 4 to 87, 1. The stone theatre was begun {fisrd to inativ rd ix^tx) 70, 1, but the upper portions were not completed until the financial administration of Lycurgus (109 — 112). The Peisianactic HaU was formed into a picture gaUery, XloixiT^n, about 79, 3. The Odeion was buUt by Pericles for the Panathensea before 84, 1. See the author's Commentatt. de Phidia i. §, 5. The cost of these buildings was consi derable ; the Propylfea cost (together with aU their appurtenances) 2012 talents (Harpocration) ; Thucydides ii, 13, says nothing in contradiction to this. 102, While in these works of architecture a spirit of art 1 was unfolded which combined grace with majesty in the hap piest manner, the plastic art, emancipated by means of the free and lively spirit of democratic Athens from all the fetters of antique stiffness, and penetrated by the powerful and magnifi cent genius of the age of Pericles, attained through Phidias the same culminating point. However, in conformity with 2 the character of the elder Hellenians, the admired master pieces of that time still bore the impress of calm dignity and unimpassioned tranquillity of soul. The spirit of Athenian 3 art soon acquired the sway throughout Greece, although art was also cultivated in the Peloponnesus in great perfection, especially among the democratic and industrious Argives. 3. Athenian artists about 01. 83, (De Phidia i. 14) worked for the Delphian temple [N. Rhein. Mus. i, s, 18.] and the Phidian school about the 86th 01. adorned Olympia and EUs with sculptures. On the state of Argos, see the author's Dorians ii. p. 147. Lewis and TufneU. 103. The Peloponnesian war, from 01. 87, 1 ex. to 93, 4, I destroyed in the first place the wealth of Athens, the ex penses of the war having exceeded the amount of revenue, and at the same time tore asunder the bond which united the Athenian school with the Peloponnesian and other artists. Of deeper influence was the internal change which occurred 2 during the Peloponnesian war, not without considerable co operation from the great pestilence (01, 87, 3) which swept away the manly race of old Athenians and left a worse behind. Sensuality and passion on the one hand, and 3 a sophistical cultivation of the understanding and lan guage on the other, took the place of the solid manner of thinking, guided by sure feelings, which was a character istic of earlier times. The Grecian people broke down the bulwarks of ancient national principles, and, as in public life, so also in all the arts, the pursuit of enjoyment and the desire for more violent mental excitement, pressed more prominently into view. 72 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Pee. IIL 1. On the expenses of the war see Bockh's Pub. Boon. i. p. 289. On the separation of the schools of art during the war, De Phidia i. 19. 2. Tl^Hrov T£ '^5|£ xxi ig rxh'Kx rn %aKii iirl Tr'hiov dvoj^ixg ri voayifix — ori Se ^'Sh t£ i3u xxi ¦TTXvrxxo^sv to ig xiiro xi^ix'hiov, touts xxi xxXov xxi X^'hai^ov xxriarvj. Thucyd. ii. 63. 3. In pubUc Ufe the tribe of flatterers of the demos, Cleon, <&c. came in the room of Olympius Pericles, who governed by the penetrating force of his genius ; the hetserae exercised more and more influence on domestic life; in tragedy the Tirxiinrixiirxrog and invorxrog of Euripides suited the taste of the great public ; lyric poetry passed over into the new un bridled and ostentatious dithyrambus, the masters of which (Melanippi- des, Cinesias, PhUoxenus, Telestes, Phrynis, and Timotheus of MUetus) were regarded by the more rigid as the corrupters of music, particularly of its ethic character; whereby at the same time the art of rhythm about the 90th 01. became more lax and irregular. The ancient orato rical art was founded on a symmetrical construction of sentences, and demanded the most tranquil declamation ; along with it an impassioned and pathetic style of speaking graduaUy obtained a footing. Particular regard must here be had to the always increasing freedom and violence in the corporeal expression of mental emotions. According to Xenophon the Spartan youth did not move his eyes any more than a brazen statue (Dorians ii. p. 279. 2 Ed.). At Athens Pericles stiU preserved " the fixed posture of countenance, the quiet' manner of walking, such an adjustment of his dress that it did not get into disorder from any orato rical gesture, the uniform tone of voice." Plut. Pericl. 6. Comp. SiebeUs in Winckelm. W. viii. s. 94. Through Cleon free and violent gestures (to r'/iv X-'?* '^i" '^X^'") invaded the oratorical platform, and the ancient iuxoafiix of the orators disappeared. Plut. Nicias 8. Tib, Gracchus 2. j^ischines against Timarchus, §, 25 sqq, Bekk, Demosth, t. 7rag«5rg. p, 420 R. We must imagine Demosthenes to have been highly impassioned in gesticulation, and .ffischines to have been somewhat stiff and affected. Lively and pathetic gesticulation on the stage began with Melanippides, a contemporary of Alcibiades, and whom Myniscus, iEschylus' actor, on that account called Tri^nxog. Aristot. Poet. 26, cum Intpp. Xenoph. Sympos. 3, 11. 104. With this spirit of the times was closely connected the tendency of those artists through whom the plastic art after the 100th 01. attained another stage; inasmuch as in their creations, compared with the works of the pre vious generation, there is manifested much more sensuality and pathos, a more disturbed equilibrium, and a more rest- . less longing of the soul, whereby indeed art again acquired a new world of ideas. But at the same time the propensity to momentary enjoyments, which was a striking feature in the Athenian people, operated as a hindrance to important pub lic undertakings, and art was thus deprived (if we do not take into account what was done by Conon and Lycurgus) of the great public encouragement which was given in the time of Pericles, until it won the favour of the Macedonian kings. ARCHITECTONICS. 73 This relation brought about changes in the spirit of art which 3 will be seen at the close of this division, and more clearly in the following. 2. Demosthenes complains bitterly of the poverty of pubUc and the magnificence of private buildings in his time. Comp. Bockh, Public Econ. i, 205 sq. Lewis. As to the works promoted by Conon, Paus. i, 1, 3. i, 2, 2. Comp. De Phidia i, 3. n, d. and in corroboration of the statement that the temple of Zeus Soter was erected by Conon, also Isocr. Euagor. §. 67. Under Lycurgus former works chiefly were completed, but there was also something new. See the psephisma in Plutarch x. Orat. p. 279. H., where perhaps we should read : ^//.it^yx Trx^xXxiStiv roig re viagolxovg XXI ritv (Txsvodiixnv xxi ro dixr^ov to Aiov. i^siQyxirxro xxi iirtri'Kiat. xxi ro rt arxoiov to Tlxvx^. xxi ro yv/xvxiriov ro Ai1xe(oi/ xa/riaxivxae. Comp. p. 251. Paus. i, 29, 16. The noblest private outlay, however, stiU continued to be that on war-horses and statues, and it is a severe reproach to Dicseo- genes (Isasus on Dicseog. Inher. §. 44), that he aUowed dedicatory pre sents, purchased by the person whose property he inherited for three talents (£615), to Ue scattered about unconsecrated in the studios of sculptors. 2. ARCHITECTONICS. 1 05. The first requisite for the prosperity of architecture, the putting forth of every energy in order to accomplish something great, was already exemplified in the walls built at this period, especially those of the Peirseus, which, at the same time that they resembled Cyclopean walls in their colos sal size, were distinguished by the utmost regularity of exe cution. The circuit of the waUs of the Peirseus with Munyohia measured 60 stadia ; the height was 40 Greek cubits (Themistocles wanted the double) ; the breadth was such that during the erection two waggons laden with stones could pass each other, the stones were xfix^ixioi, closely fitted to one another (iv ro/xri iyyavioi), and held together without any mortar, only with iron cramps soldered with lead. The walls of the Parthenon were buUt in the same way ; the cylindrical blocks of the columns, on the other hand, were connected by wooden plugs (cypress wood in the tem ple of Sunium, Bullet, d. Inst. 1832. p, 148), [One of these plugs with its sheath in Munich,] AU the technical details are here found in the highest perfection, 106. Further, there was evinced in the construction of I theatres, odeia, and other buildings for festal amusements, a clearer and more penetrating understanding which conceived in the distinctest manner the aim of the building, and knew how to attain it in the most direct way. The theatron, like 2 the ancient chorus (§. 64, 1), was always still in the main an open space for dancing (orchestra), having entrances on both sides. Around it arose the seats, arranged so as to hold the 74 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. Ill, greatest possible number of persons, and the elevated scaffold ing of the stage. The building of theatres probably emanated from Athens, but at this period it had already extended 3 over all Greece, The Odeion also, a smaller theatre with an umbrella roof, received its form at Athens, and it is in like 4 manner probable that one of the contemporaries of Phidias first produced at Olympia the ingenious form of the barriers (zjZiEtf/c) of a hippodrome. 2, On the theatre at Athens §, 101, Rem. 2. That of Epidaurus, a work of PolycUtus (about 01. 90), was the first in beauty and symme try ; a portion of the very commodiously built stairs is stiU remaining. [The seats are stiU almost entire ; the restoration with the stones them selves removed from their places would be easy.] See Clarke, Travels n, 11. p. 60. Donaldson, Antiq. of Athens, Suppl. p, 41, pi, 1. The theatre of Syracuse (comp, Houel, T. iu, pi. 187 sqq, Wilkins, Magna Grecia, ch, 2, p, 6, pi, 7, Donaldson, p. 48, pi, 4, 5) [CavaUari in Serradifalco An tich, di SicUia iv, tv. 17—22, p, 132] was built by Democopus-MyriUa before Sophron (01, 90), Bustath, ad Od, iu, 68, p, 1457. R. Comp. §. 289. 3. The odeion is pretended to have been built in imitation of the tent of Xerxes, and the roof was said to have consisted of Persian masts, hence also Themistocles instead of Pericles has been caUed the founder (Hirt, Gesch. U. p. 18). But even Attica furnished at an early period much longer trees than it did afterwards for the roofing of large build ings. Plato, Critias, p. 111. On the design of an odeion §. 289, 4, On Oleoetas, the son of Aristocles, Bockh, C, I, p, 39, 237, The author, De Phidia i, 13 ; on his x(peaig Hirt, Gesch. Ui. p. 148. It fulfiUed the object of bringing aU the chariots round the Spina at an equal dis tance from the normal starting-point of the circuits. 1 107. Probably also the art of arching, which was not yet anywhere employed in temples at this period, except perhaps in the Eleusinian Megaron, was already used in the building 2 of these theatres. According to the tradition of the ancients it was invented by Democritus, but he perhaps only im- 3 ported it from Italy (see §, 168) into Greece. The same De mocritus instituted, together with Anaxagoras, investigations into the perspective design and detailed construction of the theatrical scene; it was through him, in an especial manner, that a philosophical spirit of inquiry began to benefit the arts. 2. Poseidon, in Seneca Bp. 90. Democr. dicitur invenisce fornicem ut lapidum curvatura paulatim inclinatorum medio saxo (key-stone) alli- garetur. Democritus, according to the most probable account, died 01. 94, 1, about 90 years old. 3. Vitruv. Prsef vii. Namque primum Agatharcus (§. 134) Athenis, ./Bschylo docente tragoediam, scenam fecit et de ea commentarium reU- quit. Ex eo moniti Democr. et Anax. de eadem re scripserunt, quemad- modum oporteat ad aciem oculorum radiorumque extensionem, certo ARCHITECTONICS, 75 loco centre constitute, ad Uneas ratione naturaU respondere. This matter faUs in with the last days of .Slschylus (about 01, 80), hence Aristotle, Poet. 4, 16, ascribes soenography or perspective scene-painting to Sopho cles first. Scenography thenceforward figured as a separate art ; about the 90th Olympiad we find in Bretria an architect and scenographer called Cleisthenes (Diog. Laert. ii, 125)'; afterwards there were various others, as Budorus, Serapion in PUn. Aristot. Poet. 4, 16. Also a piotor scasnarius in Gori Inscr. Etr. i. p. 390. Comp, §. 324. 108. With regard to the columnar ordinances, the Doric I was at this period cultivated to a higher degree of grace without however losing its predominant character of majesty. The Ionic existed at Athens in a peculiar ornate form, and in 2 Ionia itself in that which was afterwards retained as the regular canonical form. Beside these appeared about the 85th 3 Olympiad the Corinthian capital, which was unfolded by an ingenious combination of the volute forms of the Ionic with freer and richer vegetable ornaments, but only attained gra dually its canonic form. Accordingly it is found single at 4 first, then multiplied, but only in subordinate portions of the building. As a leading order it was first employed in small honorary monuments. 3. See the story of CaUimachus' invention in Vitruv. iv, 1. 4. See §. 109. No. 5, 12, 13, 15. We find it employed throughout for the first time in the Choregic monument of Lysicrates, which, though elegant, is by no means to be regarded as a perfect model, 01. Ill, 2. Stuart i. ch. 4. 109. Whilst the temples of Athens at this period bore the character of the purest proportion, the choicest forms, and the most perfect harmony, and a similar spirit was exhibited in the Peloponnesus, elegance and magnificence were the quali ties most aimed at in Ionia where the art was later of coming into full bloom, and the Ionic style was almost exclusively employed (with striking, indeed, but not so careful execution in detail). The Sicilian temples on the other hand adhered to the old Doric forms, and imposed by their gigantic size and boldness of plan. 1. [Comparison of the dimensions of 17 temples in Serradifalco, Ant, di SiciUa ii. p. 80, and a ooUocation of 21 SiciUan temples in ground plan. V. tv. 43]. The Theseion, from 01. 77, 4. (§. 101. rem. 2) tiU later than 80 (§. 118). Peript. hexast. in the Doric order, 104 X 45 f of Pentelic marble. The height of the columns more than 11, the intercolumnia 3 mod. WeU preserved, even the beautiful lacunaria. Stuart, Antiq. of Athens iii. ch. 1. Supplem. ch. 8. pi. 1. [L. Ross to Qnatiov xxi 6 )/«oV roS "AgEo? iv 'AS,i,vxig 1838. 8vo. Archaol. Zeit. 1844. S. 245. In oppo sition to this Ubrichs AnnaU d. Inst. xiii. p. 75. E. Curtius in Gerhard's Archaol. Zeit. i. S. 97]. 76 HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Per. IIL 2. The Parthenon or Hecatompedon, 50 feet larger (longer) than an older one whose site it occupied, Hesych. Built by Ictinus and CalUcrates, a work on it by Ictinus and Carpion. Peript. hexast. hypseth. in the Doric order, on a high platform, entirely of Pentelic marble. Substruc tion, Ross Kunstbl. 1835. No. 31. Consists of the encircling colonnade ; the 'jT^ovyiiov at each end, formed by columns with raiUngs between, the hecatompedon strictly so called, that is the cella 100 feet in length [breadth rather, calculated after Stuart p. 8. and Le Roy p, 5, by Ideler in the Schr. der Berl. Akad. 1812. S. 186] with 16 (or 23?) columns round the hypsethron ; the parthenon properly so called, or chamber for the virgin a square enclosed space around the statue ; and the closed opisthodomos with 4 columns, to the west. The front was to the east. Entire dimen sions 227 X 101 BngUsh feet, height 65 feet. The height of the columns 12 mod., the intercol. almost 2j, diminution of the shaft ^; the swell ^V ; corner columns 2 inches thicker. Shields hung on the architrave ; re garding its riches in statuary §. 118. The triglyph frieze ingeniously composed with the greatest possible saving of stone, Klenze Aphorist. Bem. S. 368. Tf 1. Fig. 2, 3, The pure splendour of the marble was enhanced by the gold and colours used in ornamenting the smaller fiUets and mouldings. The temple suffered particularly on the 28th of Sept, 1687 from the Venetians, and more recently from Elgin ; but it always stiU excites a wonderful enthusiasm. J. Spon (1675) Voy. de Grfece. Stuart ii. ch. i. WUkins, Atheniensia, p. 93. Leake, Topography, ch. 8. Bockh C. I. p. 177. The new editors of Stuart in the German translation (Darm stadt 1829) i. p. 293, where there is also given at page 349 an account of the vestiges of the old Parthenon. CockereU's plan in Brondsted, Voy. dans la Grfece ii. pi. 38. On Heger's Investigations, Gott. G. A. 1832, s! 849. The Parthenon measured anew by J. Hoffer, Wiener Bauzeit. 1838. N. 40 ff. [There is a model of the restored Parthenon in the gallery of the Bodleiana at Oxford, 6| feet in length.] One also in the Brit. Museum. 3. The Proptl^a, built by Mnesicles. They formed the access to the acropoUs as to the court of a temple, and stood in connexion with a road leading up from the market. Carriage road to the Propylsea of PenteUc marble slabs. L. Ross in the Kunstbl. 1836. N. 60. A grand gate, with four subordinate doors, an Ionic portico on the outside and on each side a Doric frontispiece, the architecture of which was 'very skilfuUy combined with the Ionic in the interior. Comp N 5 c At the sides project wings, the northmost of which served as a poiHle;' in front of the one to the south stood a small temple to Nike Apteros. Stuart u ch. 5. Kinnard, Antiq. of Athens, Suppl. (on the ascent). Leake, Topogr ch. 8 p. 176. Le temple de Victoire sans ailes, restaur^ par R Kous- n« r T ^f ^- ^f"-^*' ^- ^^^^ ^°- ^''^- 1^37. p. 218. [Kunstbl. 1835. W. 78 1 L. Ross u. B. Schaubert Die AkropoUs von Athen, 1 Abth der T der Nike Apteros. B. 1839. fo.] ¦ ci J-. 4. The Temple of Athena Polias and Poseidon Brechtheus A very ancient sanctuary which was renewed after the Persian war but (ac cording to the Record C. I. n. 160) not completed till after 92' 4 fuU of sacred monuments, by means of which the plan of the buUding received pecu lar modifications. A double temple (.«oV S,^^oSf) with a separate apartment to the west (Pandroseion) a prostyle to the east, and two porticoes (»eo^- 1837. p. 30. in Ranga- bis Antiqu. Hellen. p. 45. and Ann. d. I. xv. p. 286 — 327. An architect ArchUochus of Agryle therein], Inwood The Erechtheion of Athens, fragments of Athenian architecture, and a few remains in Attica, Megara and Epirus, L. 1827. [Von Quast Das Brechtheum zu Athen nach dem Werk des Hr. Inwood B. 1840. — Temple of Athene Ergane on the acropo Us. See Ulrichs in the ' A%vx 1841. 4th June, and in the Abhd. der Miinchner Akad. philos. philol. Kl. iii, 3. S. 627.] 6. Eleusis. Uned. Antiq. of Attica, ch, 1 — 5 (Traduct, par M, Hittorff Ann, d, Inst. iv. p, 345). a. The great temple {f.iya^ov, dvdxro^ov) erected under the superintendence of Ictinus of Coroebus, Metagenes, and Xeno- cles, and planned for the celebration of the mysteries. Departure in the Eleusinian building from the pure style. Kugler S. 43. A large oeUa with four rows of Doric columns running across in two tiers ; between them a large opening for Ught, which was arched by Xenocles (to oirxiov ixaqvo^pos). The most co- 3 lossal statue, the brazen Promachus, which, standing between the Parthenon and the Propylsa, and towering over both, was seen by mariners at a great distance, was not yet finished when Phidias died ; almost a century later Mys executed after the designs of Parrhasius the battle of the centaurs on the shield, as well as the other works of the toreutic class with which the casting was ornamented. 1. Petersen, Observ. ad Plin. xxxiv, 19, 1. Ein Programm, Havnise, 1824. Sillig, C. A. p. 344. comp. p. 288. Comm. de Phidia i, 9. 2. The temple of Athena Areia was, according to the circumstantial account of Plutarch, buUt from the spoUs of Platasa (Aristid. 20) ; but the age of the work is not quite determined by this. On the Kallimorphos, Paus. i, 28, 2. Lucian. Imag. 6. PUn. xxxiv, 19, 1. Hiraerius, Or. xxi, 4. [cf PreUer in Gerhard's Archaol. Zeit. 1846. S. 264]. 3. The site of the Promachus is determined by Faus. i, 28, 2. comp. 86 HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Per, III, with Herod, v, 77, Here she is also seen on the coin (Leake, Topogr, Vig nette. Mionnet, Suppl. iu, pi, 18, Brondsted, Reise ii, Vign. 37). She raised the shield (dvsx^' r^" xutUx) and grasped the spear (oiov roig imoSaiv ivtarxa^ai ^^XAou"*< x^iufixrixiv, Dionys. Hal. de Isocr. p. 542. 119. The influence of this school in enlivening, and rescu ing from antique stiffness was also shown in other districts of Greece in the plastic adornment of temples, but it was modi fied in a remarkable manner by the genius and tendencies of other individuals and schools of art. The splendid groups in the pediments of the temple of Zeus at Olympia, executed by Alcamenes and Pseonius of Mende have entirely disappeared ; but the remains of the metopes on the pronaos and opisthodo mos (comp. §. 109. ii, 9.) representing the labours of Hercules manifest a fresh truthfulness and naive grace which have no longer anything of the fetters of the old style, but still how ever remain far short of the grandeur of the Phidian ideal for mations (especially in the conception of Hercules). The reliefs of Phigalia give, in individual groups, distinct indications of 90 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. III. Athenian models, and display in the composition a matchless power of invention combined with the most lively imagination ; on the other hand we perceive in them a less purified sense of forms, a love of exaggerated violent gestures and almost strained postures, a throwing of the drapery into folds singu larly tight or as if curled by the wind, and in the conception of the subject itself a harsher character than can be ascribed to the Phidian school. In Sicily indeed we find the old style preserved in all its severity even at this period for architec tonic ends, in the giants of the Agrigentine temple of Zeus ; but the fragments from the tympana of this sanctuary as well as the metopes found in the southernmost temple of the lower city of Selinus (comp. §. 109. iv, 24.) show that here also, in the decades immediately subsequent to the activity of the Phi dian school, a freer and livelier treatment had found its way from Athens. 2. Olympia. On the east pediment were to be seen— the workman ship of Pseonius — around the statue of Zeus, Qilnomaus with his wife Sterope, on the one side, and Pelops and Hippodameia on the other, then the charioteers, quadrigse, and attendants of the horses, and lastly the river-gods Alpheus and Cladeus in symmetrical disposition ; on the west pediment, by Alcamenes, as central point of a battle with centaurs, Peirithous the sou of Zeus, whom Cseneus helps in rescuing his wife who had been carried off by Burytion, whilst Theseus chastises two centaurs as robbers of boys and girls, Paus. v, 1 6. But of the twelve labours of Hercules (in the enumeration of which in Pausanias, v, 10, 2, Cerberus has probably faUen out), the combat with the Cnossian buU, the vanquished and dying Uon, a local goddess (perhaps the Stymphalian nymph Metopa), a portion of the hydra and of the Amazon lying on the ground, on the opis- thodom, parts of Diomed, the boar, Geryon in the pronaos, together with several smaller fragments, were discovered in the year 1829, and are now at Paris. The hair, which was not worked out, was indicated by colours. Exped. Sclent, de la Moree pi. 74—78. Clarac M. d. Sculpt, pi. 195 bis. D. A. K. pi. 30. Comp. R. Rochette Journal des Sav. 1831. p. 93. BuUet. d. Inst. 1832. p. 17, 33. Ann. p. 212. Welcker's Rhein. M. I. iv. p, 503. HaU, Encyclop, III, iu, p. 243. 3. Phigalia. The frieze of the temple of Apollo Epicurius (§. 109. ii, 12) discovered by Linckh, von HaUer, Cockerell, Foster and others, ran over the Ionic columns around the hypsethron ; it is in the British Museum, in tolerably complete preservation. It represents in alto-relievo the battle of the Centaurs and Amazons, and between them Apollo and Artemis as auxiliary deities fastening to the scene in a chariot drawn by stags. The group of Cseneus is treated as on the Theseion, the rape of the maiden and boy as in the pediment at Olympia. Bassirilievi della Grecia disegn. da G. M. Wagner, 1814. Marbles of the British Museum P. iv. 0. M. Baron von Stackelberg's ApoUotempel zu Bassse in Arca- dien und die daselbst ausgegr. Bildwerke. 1828. 4. Agrigentum. On the giants §. 109. iv. 20 ; the Caryatides of the temple of Athena Polias (§. 109. i, 4) have in common with these a firm PLASTIC ART, 91 and upright posture, although they are in other respects animated by a quite different artistic spirit. The pediment groups represented the battle of the giants on the east, and the capture of Troy on the west ; the sUght fragments of these belong to the noblest style of art, CockereU, Antiq, of Athens, Suppl, p, 4. frontisp. Selinus, Portions of 5 metopes from the pronaos and posticum of the temple nearest the sea, dug up in 1831, by the Duke of Serradifalco and by VUlareale, from the indications of AngeU, now in Palermo, Actseon clothed in the hide of a stag (as in Stesichorus), Hercules with the Queen of the Amazons, PaUas and Ares [a giant], Apollo and Daphne (!) are thought to be recognised in them. The bodies of calcareous tufa, with a coating of paint. Only the extremities are of marble after the manner of acroUths (§. 84), only white extremities however in women [as in the vase paintings]. Bullet, d. Inst. 1831. p. 177. Transactions of the Royal Soc. of Litter, ii, i, vi. [Serradifalco Ant. d. SioUia ii. tav. 30 — 34.] 120, Beside this Attic school rose also tlie Sicyonico- Argive school (comp. §, 82) to its zenith, by means of the great Polyclitus. Although, according to some, it was still left to this master to carry the toreutic art to perfection in his colossal statue of Hera at Argos, he nevertheless remained far behind Phidias in the fashioning of gods in general. On the other hand the art of modelling brazen statues of athletes, which pre vailed in the Peloponnese, was raised through him to the most perfect representation of beautiful gymnastic figures, in which peculiarity of character indeed was not neglected, but still however the main object was the representation of the purest forms and justest proportions of the youthful body. Hence one of his statues, the Doryphorus, whether this was the in tention of the artist or whether it was the judgment of pos terity, became a canon of the proportions of the human frame, which at that time were in general shorter and stouter than afterwards. In like manner was ascribed to him, according to Pliny, the establishment of the principle, that the weight of the body should be laid chiefly on one foot (ut uno crure insisterent signa), whence resulted the contrast, so significant and attractive, of the bearing and more contracted with the borne and more developed side of the human body. 2. On the Hera in the sanctuary at Argos, especially Paus. ii, 17, Maximus Tyr. Diss. 14. p, 260 R,, Bottiger Andeut, s, 122, Q, de Quincy p, 326. [His copy is worse than a caricature.] Comp. §. 363. The head of the statue is copied on later coins of Argos (MiUingen, Anc. Coins pi. 4, 19. Cadalvene, RecueU pi. 3, 1. Comp. the HPA APPEIA of the Alexandrian coin of Nero, Eckhel D. N. iv. p. 63) ; it is adorned with the same broad Stephanos (comp. §. 340) as the Hera Olympia represented in older style on the coins of BUs, the Lacinian Hera on coins of Pandosia, and of Crotona (according to Eckhel ; of Veseris according to MiUingen, Anc. Coins pi. 2, 8), and also the Platsean Hera, placed together in D. A. K. tf. .30. 'I'd Woy^vx'hiirov ioxvx rri rixv^l, xxKkitrrx roiv 'wxvrav — accord- 92 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. III. ing to Strabo viii. p. 372. Toreuticen sic erudisse, ut Phidias aperuisse (judicatur) PUn. xxxiv, 19, 2, [He previously says of Phidias, primusque artem toreuticen aperuisse atque demonstrasse merito judicatur, in both passages evidently referring to their brazen statues, in the same way as to reutice is in another passage, xxxv, 36, 8, contradistinguished from paint ing, as plastice in the strict sense, or as the plastic art, sculpture generally. Schneider in his dictionary remarks that Pliny means sculpture in bronze ; but this expression indeed has been exposed to strange interpretations, arbitrary and accidental inaccuracies of aU sorts], (on the other hand ac cording to QuintU, Phidias in ebore longe citra semulum). Comp, for general information the criticisms in Cic. Brut 18. Quintil. xii, 10. Schorn, Studien, s. 282. Meyer, Geschichte i. s. 69. 3. Diadumenum fecit molUter puerum (a similar statue from VUIa Parnese, Winckelm. W. vi. tf 2. Gerard, Ant. Bildw. 69). — Doryphorum viriUter puerum [counterparts with reference to Prodicus, see Welcker Kl. Schr. ii. S. 482] — destrigentem se {dTo^vo^evov) et nudum talc in- cessentem (i. e. ¦yrxyx^xnxarriv d'T^oTrn^vi^ovrtt, see Jacobs ad Philostr. p. 435), duosque pueros item nudos talis ludentes {dar^xyxy^i^ovrxg). PUn. ibid. SUUg C. A. p. 364 sqq. 4. As to the Canon, Plin. ibid. (Doryphorum, quem et canona artifices vocant), Cic. Brut. 86. Orat. 2, Quintil, v, 12, Lucian de Salt, 75, Hirt, Abh, der Berl, Acad, 1814, Hist, CI, s, 19. [Thiersch Bp, S, 367 rejects the emendation quem et for et quem, comp. Creuzer zur Archaol. i, S. 38,] As a writing only in Galen Tn^l rav xxS ' Iirirox^xr-nv xxi TlKdr. iv, 3. T. V, p, 449, Kiihn, and elsewhere, Quadrata {rer^xyavx) Polycl, signa esse tradit Varro et prene ad unum exemplum, Plin.' This subject treated more minutely §, 332, [cf, §. 130, 2,] 1 ] 21. It accords very well with this character of Polyclitus that he conquered Phidias, Ctesilaus, Phradmon and Cydon 3 with his amazon in a contest of artists at Ephesus, The amazon of Phidias leaning on a lance has been recognised in the one in the Vatican preparing to leap, and the wounded amazon of Ctesilaus in a Capitoline statue. Accordingly we must conceive that of Polyclitus to be the highest point at tained in the representation of those blooming and powerfully 3 developed female forms, Polyclitus as well as Ctesilaus was also already distinguished in portrait statues ; the former sculptured Artemon Periphoretus, the latter Pericles Olympius. 2. On the Amazon of the Vatican (Raccolta 109, Piranesi Stat, 37, M, Prang, ui,14, BouiU, u, 10 ; there is one equally fine in the Capitol, nu merous other copies of the same original), the writer de Myrina Amazone in Commentat. Soc, Gott. rec, vii, p, 59. D. A. K. Tf 31. Comp. Gerhard BuUet, d, Inst, 1830, p, 30, 273, Beschr, Roms, i, §, 94, Hirt, Gesch! der Kunst, s, 177, [The Akad, Mus. at Bonn 1841. S. 63 IF.] On the wounded Amazon (in the Capitol, M. Cap. iii. t. 46 ; in the Louvre n. 281, BouiU. u, 11. in the Vatican Gerh. Beschr. Roms. S. 96). See the ed. Winckelm. iv. s. 356. vi. s. 103. Meyer Gesch. s. 81. Anm. 78. On a fine but mutilated statue of the same kind, only in a somewhat hard style in the castle at WorUtz, Hirt, ibid. s. 160. A torso in the Royal cabinet PL.4.STIC AUT. 93 of antiquities at Vienna, under the natural size, is very remarkable from this, that, in the sharp features of the countenance with the head inclin ing to the left, in the hair disposed in a wiry manner around the fore head, in the stiffly folded upper and under drapery (the latter covers also the right breast), the Amazonian ideal is preserved as it had been already developed by the generation of artists before Phidias and OtesUaus. 3. Artemon Periphoretus was constructor of maohineB for Pericles in the war against Samos (01. 84, 4) ; the pretended Anacreontic poem (Mehlhorn, Anacr. p. 224) on him was doubtless of later origin. [The poem is certainly genuine, and Artemon Trs^icpo^nrog, an effeminate con temporary of Anacreon, who must be distinguished from Artemon the constructor of machines ; the A. Periphoretus of Polyclete was a com panion to the Hercules Ageter, as is shown in the Rhein. Mus. iii, 1. S. 155 ff., to which the author himself has referred in the margin.] PUny mentions the statues of Artemon and Pericles. On Sosandra §. 112. Colotes, a pupil of Phidias, sculptured ^Ai?osopAi according to a striking statement in PUny. Stypax fashioned (in sport) a slave of Pericles as 'uirKxyxvoTrr-tig, whom PUny seems to have confounded with the workman of Mnesicles (Plut. Pericl. 13). 122. Art expressed itself still more corporeally in Myron I the Eleutherean (half a Boeotian) who was in an especial man ner led by his individuality to conceive powerful natural life in the most extended variety of appearances with the greatest truth and ndivetk (primus hie multiplicasse veritatem videtur). His cow, his dog, his sea- monsters were highly 2 vivid representations from the animal kingdom ; from the 3 same tendency sprang his dolichodromus Ladas, who was re presented in the highest and most intense exertion, his dis cobolus conceived in the act of throwing, and the numerous imitations of which testify to its fame, his pentathli andjoa?i- cratiastoe. With regard to mythic forms, Hercules was parti- 4 cularly suited to him, and he sculptured him together with Athena and Zeus, in a colossal group for Samos. He remained, -5 however, in the indifferent, motionless cast of countenance, and the stiff workmanship of the hair on the same stage with the earlier brass-casters (especially those of .fflgina), from whom, generally speaking, he differed less than Polyclitus and Phidias. 1. On Myron, Bottiger, Andeut. s. 144. SiUig C. A. p. 281. Myron qui psene hominum animas ferarumque sere expresserat, Petron. 88, is not in contradiction with : — corporum tonus curiosus, animi sensus non expressisse videtur, PUn. xxxiv, 19, 3. [Statins SUv. iv, 6, 25, quse docto multum vigilata Myroni Aera, overlooked by Sillig, coinciding with Ovid's operosus.] 2. On the cow rendered famous by epigrams (Anthol. Auson.), with distended udders according to Tzetz. ChU. viu, 194, see Gothe, Kunst und Alterthum ii, p. 1. (It cannot however for various reasons be the 94 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. III. one on the coins of Epidamnus). Four other cows by Myron, Propert. ii, 31, 7. 3. On the Ladas, Anthol, Pal, T, ii, p, 640, Plan, n. 53, 54. On two brazen figures at Naples as imitations (?), Schorn's Kunstblatt 1826. N. 45. Comp. M. Borb. v, 54. The discobolus a distortum et elaboratum signum, Quintil. ii, 13. Lucian minutely describes a copy, Philops. 18, rov i'jrixixv(p6rx xxrdro ax'^^f^^r^g x(pimug, d'TTiar^xfi^ivov iig r^v iiaxoSjn)iroffo;df. A Signum Corinthium of precisely the same style of art is described by PUny, Epist. iu, 6, 3, See especiaUy the accounts of the sacred gifts presented by the Lacedsemonians of .^gospotami (the sea-blue nauarchi) Paus, x, 9, 4. Plut, Lysander 18, de Pyth, orac, 2. Comp. Paus. vi, 2, 4. An iconic statue of iysander in marble at Delphi. Plut Lys. 1. B. THE AGE OF PRAXITELES AND LYSIPPUS. 124 After the Peloponnesian war a new school of art i arose at Athens and in the surrounding district, — not con nected with the previous one by any discoverable succession, — whose style in like measure corresponded to the spirit of the new, as that of Phidias did to the character of earlier Attic life (§. 103). It was chiefly through Scopas who was born 2 at Paros, an island related by race to Athens and then subject to it, and Praxiteles, a native of Athens itself, that art first received the tendency to more excitable and tender feelings, which corresponded to the frame of men's minds at that time. It was combined however in these masters in the most beau tiful manner with a noble and grand conception of their sub jects. 1. Plastic artists of the period : Mentor, toreutes, between the 9Qth 01. (he imitated the cups of Thericles in sUver) and the 106th (when some of his works perished in the Artemision of Ephesus) ; Cleon of Sicyon, a scholar of Antiphanes, 98 — 102 ; Soopas the Parian, probably son of Aristander (§. 1 12. Bockh C. I. 2285 b.), architect, sculptor and brass-caster, 97 — 107. Polycles of Athens, a scholar of Stadieus (I), brass-caster, 102 ; Damocritus of Sicyon, a scholar of Piso, brass-caster, 102 ; Pausanias of ApoUonia, brass-caster, about 102 ; Samolas from Ar cadia, brass-caster, about 102. Eucleides of Athens, sculptor, about 102 (?) ; Leocharbs of Athens, brass-caster and sculptor, 102 — 111. (About 104 he was, according to the Ps. Platon. Letter xiu. p, 361, a young and excellent sculptor) ; Hypatodorus (Hecatodorus) and Aristogeiton of Thebes, brass-casters, 102. Sostrates, brass-caster, 102 — 114. Damophon from Messenia, brass-caster, 103 sqq, ; Xenophon of Athens, brass-caster, 103 ; CaUistonicus of Thebes, brass-caster, 103 ; Strongylion, brass-caster, about 103 (l). Olympiosthenes, brass-caster, about 103 (?) ; Euphranor, the Isthmian, painter, sculptor, brass -caster and toreutes, 104 — ^110. 96 HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Pf.u. III. Praxiteles of Athens (0. 1. 1604. Opera ejus sunt Athenis in Oeramico, PUn. N. H. xxxvi, 4, 5), sculptor and brass- caster, 104—110. Echion [or Action], brass-caster and painter, 107 ; Therimachus, brass -caster and painter, 107 ; Timotheus, sculptor and brass-caster, 107 ; Pythis, sculptor, 107 ; Bryaxis of Athens, sculptor and brass-caster, 107—119 ; Herodotus of Olynthus, about 108; Hippias, brass-caster, 110; Lysippus of Sicyon, brass-caster, 103—114 (with Paus. vi, 4, comp. Corsini Diss. Agon. p. 126), according to Athen. xi. p. 784, as late as 116, 1 (?) ; Lysis-^ trates of Sicyon, brother of Lysippus, plastes, 114 ; Silanion of Athens, ai self-taught artist; Sthenis, Euphronides, Ion, and ApoUodorus, brass- casters, 114 ; Amphistratus, sculptor, 114; Hippias, brass-caster, 114 (to be inferred from Paus. vi, 1.3, 3) ; Menestratus, sculptor about 114 (?) ; Choreas, brass-caster about 114 ; PhUo, son of Antipatrus (?), brass- caster, 114 ; Pamphilus, a scholar of Praxiteles, 114. Cephissodotus (or -dorus) and Timarchus, sons of Praxiteles, brass-casters, 114 — 120. 1 125. Scopas, principally a worker in marble (the product of his home), the mild light of which doubtless seemed to him better suited to the subjects of his art than the sterner brass, borrowed his favourite themes from the cycles of Dionysus 2 and Aphrodite. In vthe former he was certainly one of the first who presented the Bacchic enthusiasm in a perfectly free 3 and unfettered form (comp. §. 96, Rem. 21) ; his mastery in the latter was shown by the collocation of Eros, Himeros and Pothos, beings differing from one another by slight shades, in 4 one group of statues. The Apollo-Ideal is indebted to him for the more graceful and animated form of the Pythian Cith- aroedus ; he produced it by lending to the accustomed figure in art (§. 96, Rem. 17) a greater expression of rapture and 5 exaltation. One of his most splendid works was the group of sea-deities who escorted Achilles to the island of Leuce — a subject in which tender grace, heroic grandeur, daring power and a luxuriant fulness of strong natural life are combined in such wonderful harmony, that even the attempt to conjure up and conceive the group, in the spirit of ancient art, must 6 fill us with the most cordial delight. It is highly probable that the character of the forms and gestures peculiar to the Bacchian cycle, was first tranferred by Scopas to the repre sentation of beings of the ocean, whereby the Tritons took the shape of Satyrs, and the Nereids of Meenads of the sea, and the entire train seemed as if animated and intoxicated with inward fulness of life (comp. §. 402). 2. Dionysus at Cnidus in marble, Plin. xxxvi, 4, 5. A Masnad with streaming hair as x'l^a'jopoi/of, in Parian marble, CaUistratus 2. Anthol. Pal. ix, 774, and Plan, iv, 60 (App. ii. p. 642), probably the one on the reUef in Zoega, Bassir. iLj^tv. 84, which also recurs on the reUefs, ibid. 83, 106, on the vase of SosiS(ius (BouiU. iii, 79), in the Marquis of Lans- downe's coUection and in the British Museum (R. vi. n. 17*). A Panisc Cic. de. Divin. i, 13. PLASTIC ART. 97 3. At Rome a naked Venus Praxiteliam illam antecedens (in order of time?), Plin. xxxvi, 4, 7. Venus, Pothos (and Phaethon?) in Samo- thrace, Plin. ibid. Eros, Himeros and Pothos at Megara, Paus. i, 43, 6. Scopas' brazen Aphrodite Pandemos at Elis, sitting on a goat, formed a remarkable contrast to Phidias' Urania with the tortoise, which was placed beside it. Paus, vi, 25, 2. Chametasras ? 4. The ApoUo of Scopas was, according to Pliny, the chief statue of the temple by which Augustus expressed his gratitude to his tutelar deity for the victory at Actium, and hence it appeal's on Roman coins since the time of Augustus with the two legends : Ap. Actius and Pala- tiniis. See Eckhel D. N. vi. p. 94, 107. vu. p. 124. Comp. Tacit. Ann. xiv, 14. Sueton. Nero 25 (with the notes of Patinus). It is described by Propert. ii, 31, 15 : Inter matrem, (by Praxiteles, PUn.) deus ipse itUerque sororem (by Timotheus, Plin.) Pythius in longa carmina veste sonat. The one in the Vatican discovered together with the muses in the viUa of Oassius is a copy of this Palatine ApoUo. See M. PioCl. i. tv. 16 (comp. Visconti p. 29, who was inclined however to consider the statue by Tim- archides, PUn. xxxvi, 4, 10 as the original). M. Frang. i. pi. 5. BouUl. i, pi, 33, 5, Sed in maxima dignatione. On. Domitii delubro in Circo Flaminio, Neptunus ipse et Thetis atque Achilles, Nereides supra delphinas et cete et hippocampos sedentes. Item Tritones, chorusque Phorci et pristes ac multa aUa marina omnia ejusdem manus, prseclarum opus etiamsi totius vitse fuisset. Plin. . On the mythus of the statuary, see especially v. Kohler, Mem, sur les lies et la Course d'Achille, P^tersb, 1827. Sect. 1. 126. The Roman connoisseurs could not determine, as in 1 some other works, whether the group of Niobe (which stood in the temple of Apollo Sosianus at Rome) was by Scopas or Praxiteles. At all events the group gives evidence of a style 2 of art which loved to represent impressive and agitating sub jects, but treated them at the same time with the moderation and noble reserve which the genius of the Greeks in the best ages required. The artist does his utmost to win over our 3 minds for the stricken family punished by the gods ; the noble and grand forms of the countenances, in which family relation ship is expressed, appear in no instance disagreeably distorted by bodily pain and fear of the impending danger ; the coun tenance of the mother — ^the apex of the whole representation — expresses the despair of maternal love in the purest and most exalted form. A judgment on the composition and the 4 motives which animated and held together the groups in their parts is rendered very difiicult by the state in which they have come down to us. This much however is clear that, 5 besides the mother, among the other figures also there were several united into smaller groups, in which the effort to pro tect and assist others interrupted the series of fugitives trying to save themselves, in a manner equally satisfactory to the eye and the mind. G 98 HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Per, III. 1. Par hsesitatio est in tempio ApoUinis Sosiani, Nioben cum liberis morientem (or Niobse liberos morientes) Scopas an Praxiteles fecerit, PUn. xxxvi, 4, 8. The epigrams pronounce for Praxiteles (Anthol. Pal. App. ii. p. 664. Plan, iv, 129. Auson. Epit. Her. 28). The temple of Apollo Sosianus was probably founded by C. Sosius who was under An toninus in Syria (com. Dio. Cass, xlix, 22, with PUn. xiii, 11), [Wagner S. 296,] As to the group having been placed on a pediment (according to Bartholdy's idea), see Guattani, Memorie Bnciclop, 1817. p. 77, and Le statue della favola di Niobe sit. nella prima loro disposizione, da C. R. CockereU. F. 1818, also (Zannoni) Galeria di Firenze, Stat. P. ii. tv. 76. [Wagner disputes this.] Thiersch doubts it, but nevertheless gives to the group the triangular form and bilateral disposition. [Not the trian gular form, S. 369. comp. 273.] 4. To the Florentine group (found at Rome in 1683 near the gate of S. Giovanni) many unsuitable figures have been added (a discobolus, a Psyche, a muse-like figure, a nymph, a horse). The group of youthlul pancratiasts Ukewise, although found hard by, does not fit weU into the whole, but seems to have been executed after the symplegma of Cephisso dotus, the son of Praxiteles (digitis verius corpori quam marmori impres- sis, PUn.) [?]. But even the rest of the statues are of unequal merit, nay of different marble. Of the Niobids at Florence, besides the mother with the youngest daughter, ten figures may be held as genuine, and (conformably to the remark of Thorwaldsen) the so-caUed Narcissus (Galeria tv. 74) may be added to them. It is stUl very doubtful whether the Florentine figures are those which were famous in antiquity, as the treatment of the bodies, although in general exceUent and grandiose, does not however display that uniform perfection and Uving freshness which characterized the works of the Greek chisel at the best period. — On the contrary the breathing Ufe of Greek art cannot but be recognised in the so-caUed lUoneus in the Glyptotheca at Munich (no. 126) ; though worthy of a Scopas, it cannot however receive an entirely satisfactory explanation from a union with the Niobids. Comp. Kunstblatt 1828. No. 45. The so- caUed Niobid at Paris (L. 441. Clarac, pi. 323), is more probably a Msenad struggUng away from a Satyr. Of the authentic figures in the group, out of Florence the sublime head of the mother (very fine in Sarskoselo and in Lord Yarborough's coUection) and the dying outstretched son (also at Dresden and Munich) are most frequently to be met with. 6. Besides the mother, the following partial groupings are indicated : a. The pedagogue (Gal. 16) was so placed beside the youngest son (Gal. 11) that the latter pressed towards him on the left side while he drew him to himself with the right arm, according to the group found at Soissons, which is copied (with a confounding of right and left) in R. Rochette M. I. pi. 79. comp. p. 427. b. A son (Gal. 9) supported, with his left foot advanced under her sinking form, a dying sister, who is preserved in a group in the Vatican, caUed Cephalus and Procris,— and endeavoured to shield her by spreading his garment over her ; ac cording to the observations of [Canova], Schlegel, Wagner, and Thiersch (Epochen, s. 315). c. A daughter (Gal. 3) in Uke manner tried with out spread upper-garment to protect the son who is sunk on his left knee (Gal. 4, Race. 33) ; a group which can be recognised with certainty from a later gem-engraving (Impronti gemm. d. Inst, i, 74). I also recognise PRAXITELES. 9!) these two Niobids, the brother protected by his sister (D. A. K. Tf 33, d. e.), in the group M. Cap. iii, 42. in which however more accurate in formation is desirable regarding the restorations, by means of which the sister appears to have been brought from the upright posture into this stooping attitude. [Scarcely tenable, 0, Jahn Archaol. Beitr. S. 1 78.] Fabroni, Dissert. suUe statue appartenenti aUa favola di Niobe. F, 1779 (with unsuitable iUustrations from Ovid), H. Meyer, Propylaen Bd. u. St. 2, 3, and Amalthea i. s. 273 (Erganzungen), A, W, Schlegel, BibUoth&que UniverseUe 1816, Litter. T. ui, p. 109, [OSuvres T, 2,] Welcker, Zeitschr. i. s, 588 ff, Thiersch, Epochen, s, 316, 368, Wagner in the Kunstblatt 1830, N. 51 ff. [Welcker on the grouping of Niobe and her chUdren, in the Rhein. Mus. iv. S. 233. Feuerbach Vatic. Ap. S. 260 ff. Guigniaut R6Ugions de 1' Antiqu. pi. 215 bis. Bxplic. p. 331-33, Ed, Gerhard Drei Vorles, 1844. S. 49 ff. Ad. Trendelenburg, Niobe, cinige Betrachtungen iiber das Schone u. Erhabene Berl. 1846.] Drawings in Fabroni, in the Galerie de Florence i . . iv. and the Galeria di Firenze, Stat. P. i. tv. 1 sqq. D. A. K. tf 33, 34. Comp. §. 417. 127. Praxiteles also worked chiefly in marble, and for 1 the most part preferred subjects from the cycles of Diony sus, Aphrodite and Eros. In the numerous figures which he 2 borrowed from the first, the expression of Bacchic enthusiasm as well as of roguish petulance was united with the most refined grace and sweetness. It was Praxiteles who in several 3 exquisite statues of Eros represented in consummate flower the beauty and loveliness of that age in boys which seemed to the Greeks the most attractive ; who in the unrobed Aph- 4 rodite combined the utmost luxuriance of personal charms with a spiritual expression in which the queen of love herself appeared as a woman needful of love, and fllled with inward longing. However admirable these works might be, yet in 5 them the godlike majesty and sovereign might, which the earlier sculptors had sought to express even in the forms of this cycle, gave place to adoration of the corporeal attractions with which the deity was invested. The life of the artist with 6 the Hetserae had certainly some influence in promoting this tendency ; many a one of these courtesans filled all Greece with her fame, and really seemed to the artist, not without reason, as an Aphrodite revealed to sense. Even in the cycle of 7 Apollo, Praxiteles thought fit to introduce many changes ; thus in one of his most beautiful and finely imagined works he brought the youthful Apollo nearer in posture and figure to the nobler satyric forms than an earlier artist would have done. Altogether, Praxiteles, the master of the younger, as 8 Phidias was of the elder, Attic school, was almost entirely a sculptor of deities; heroes he seldom executed, athletes never. , 1. Of Praxiteles as a worker in marble, Plin. xxxiv, 8, 19. xxxvi, 4, 5. Phsedr. v. Prsef. Statins S. iv, 6, 26. O xxrx/xi^xg xx^ug roig y\i^ivoig s^yoig rd riig ^vx'iig 'n-x^ri, Diodor. xxvi. Bcl. 1. p. 512. Wess. 100 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. III. 2. Cycle of Demeter, see Preller Demeter u. Persephone, S. 91. Dionysus of BUs, Paus. vi, 26, 1, perhaps the one described by CaUistra tus 8, of brass, a beautiful youth crowned with ivy, engirt with a nebris, resting his lyre (?) on the thyrsus, and with a tender and dreamy expres sion. Besides this youthful form, which was then but newly introduced, Praxiteles also represented the god in the older style, in mature man hood, as in the group which Pliny describes, xxxiv, 8, 19, 10 : Liberum patrem et Bbrietatem nobilemque una Satyrum quem Grseci itt^i^&irrov cognominant. It is not ascertained whether the Satyr of the Tripod- street (Paus. i, 20, 1. Athen. xiii, 591 b. comp. Heyne, Antiq. Aufs. u, s. 63) is the same. This is taken to be the one which is often to be met with leaning on the trunk of a tree and reposing after playing on the flute: M. PioCl. ii, 30; M. Cap. iii, 32; M. Frang. ii. pi. 12; BouUl. i, 55. comp. Winckelm. W. iv. s. 75, 277. vi. s. 142. Visconti PioCl. u. p. 60. Satyr at Megara, Paus. i, 43, 5. Praxiteles executed a group of Monads, Thyads, Caryatic dancers (§. 366.) and SUeni in noisy procession. PUn. xxxvi, 4, 6. Anthol. Pal. ix, 766. Pan carrying a wine-skin, laughing nymphs, a Danae, in marble, Anthol. Pal. vi, 317. App. T. ii. p. 705. Plan, iv, 262. Hermes carrying the young Dionysus, in marble (Paus. V, 17, 1), probably copied in the reUef, Zoega, Bassir. i, 3, and on the vase of Salpion. §. 384. 3. Bros. a. At Parion, in marble, naked, in the bloom of youth, PUn. xxxvi, 4, 5. b. At Thespise, of Pentelic marble with gilded wings (Julian Or. ii. p. 54 c. Spanh.), a boy in youthful bloom {iv a^x), Lucian, Amor. 11. 17. Paus. ix, 27. Dedicated by Phryne (or Glycera), carried away by Caligula, then again by Nero, at the time of Pliny in Octavise scholis (Manso Mythol. Abhandl. s. 361 ff.). At Thespise stood a copy by Menodorus, Paus. JuUan, from ignorance, speaks of the Thespian statue as if it were of brass. .aSgypt. Anthol. Pal. App. ii. p. 687. Plan. iv, 203. c. The Eros of marble in the sacrarium of Hejus at Messana, similar to the Thespian, Cic. Verr. 1. iv, 2, 3. (Comp. Amalthea iii. s. 300. Wiener Jahrb, xxxix, s. 138). d. e. Two of brass, described by CaUistratus 4, 11, the one reposing (Jacobs, p. 693), the other encircUng his hair with a fillet. The Parian or Thespian statue is probably imi tated in the beautiful Torso from OentoceUe, with languishing expression, and hair arranged in the fashion of youth (Crobylus), M, PioCl. i, 12. Bouill. i, 15,-the more perfect one, with wings, is preserved at Naples, M. Borbon. vi, 25. The Bros of the Elgin CoUection in the Brit. Mus. is similar, only it is stiU more slender and deUcate. R. xv. n. 305.* D. A. K. Tf 35. [Brit. Mus. T. ix.] 4. Aphrodite, a. The one ordered by the Ooans velata specie, that is entirely draped, Plin. xxxiv, 4, 5, b. That purchased by the Cnidians, in the temple of Aphrodite Buploea, placed in a chapel specially fitted up for it (sedicula quse tota aperitur, Plin., i/ewj dfixii^^ xxi xE;:i;»§;o'^i»ij). — Ilxv Se to xaXTiOf xvriig dxxhvTerov, oiihi^ixg ia^iyrog x^'n'sxovffyigt ysyu^vc-yrxi, Tr'h^^v oax rri iri^x p^E/pi.T^tf xiZu PRAXITELES, LEOCHARBS. 11)1 'KiKn^arug i-rnx^ii-msiv. — Tav Ss Toff laxioig ivsacp^xylafiivav £| ixxri^av ru-stuv oix xv EiVo( rig ag ijiiig 6 yiT^uig. Mdjow te xxi xvijfiYig st' euSu TSTaiWEi/Uf aixqi TToSo'f iix^ijiafiivoi pu^ftoi. From this and from the coins of Cnidus in honour of PlautiUa we can recognise this Aphrodite in the statue in the gardens of the Vatican (Perrier, n. 85. Episcopius, n. 46, Race. 4), in the recently draped one in the M. PioCl. i, 11, and another brought to Munich (n. 135) from the Braschi palace (Plaxman, Lectures on Sculpt. pi. 22), and from these also in busts (in the Louvre 59. BouUl. i. 68) and in gems, Lippert Dactyl. I, i, 81. Her nudity was accounted for by the laying aside her dress in the bath with the left, the right covered her lap. The forms were grander, the countenance, notwithstanding an ex pression of smiUng languishment, was of a loftier character and rounder form, than in the Medicean Venus; the hair was bound by a simple fillet. The identity of the Cnidian and the Medicean Venus was main tained by Meyer ad Winckelm. W. iv, ii. s. 143. Jenaer ALZ. 1806. Sept. 67. Gesch. der Kunst. i. s. 113, in opposition to Heyne Ant. Aufs. i. s. 123. Visconti M. PioCl. i. p. 18. Levezow, Ob die Mediceische Venus ein Bild der Knidischen sei. B. 1808. Thiersch Epochen, s. 288. — c. A brazen one, Plin. d. One of marble at Thespise, Paus. ix, 27. e. An Aphrodite by Praxiteles stood in the Adonion at Alexandria on Latmus, Steph, B. s, V, ' A7iE|ai/Sj£;a. Peitho and Paregorus ('7rx^(pxixig, Homer) with the Aphr, Praxis at Megara. Paus, i, 43, 6, According to Clem. Alex. Prot. p. 36. Sylb. Arnob. adv. gent, vi, 13, Praxiteles took Cratina as the model of his Aphrodite ; according to others Phryne, who also stood sculptured in marble by him at Thespise (Paus. ix, 27) and gilt at Delphi (Athen. xiii. p. 591. Paus. x, 14, 5. Plut. de Pyth. orac. 14, 16), the trophy of Hellenic voluptuousness according to Crates. Comp. Jacobs in Wieland's Att. Mus. Bd. iii. s. 24. 51. Accord ing to Strabo he also made a present of an Bros to Glycera, ix, p, 410. According to Pliny he represented the triumph of a sprightly hetsera over an Attic matron ef melancholy disposition : Signa flentis matronse et meretricis gaudentis (Phryne). Comp. B. Murr " Die Mediceische Venus und Phryne." 7. Fecit et (ex acre) puberem [ApoUinem] subrepenti lacertse comi- nus sagitta insidiantem, quem Sauroctonon vocant, PUn. comp. Martial, Epigr, xiv, 172, Seitz maintained that this lizard-slayer is no Apollo, Mag, Bncycl, 1807, T. v. p. 259. There is now perceived in this an allu sion to augury by Uzards (Welcker, Akad. Kunstmus. zu Bonn, s. 71 ff. A, Feuerbach Vatic. Apoll, s, 226), but playfuUy handled. Imitations, possessing naive grace and loveUness, very similar to the satyr of Prax iteles in the posture of the feet, are often to be met with (VUl. Borgh, St, 2, n, 5. Winckelm. M. I. i. n. 40. M. Royal, i. pi, 16 ; M, PioCl. i, 13 ; a brazen one in Villa Albani) ; also on gems (Millin, Pierr, grav, pi. 5 and elsewhere). There is also mention made of an ApoUo with his sister and mother ; Leto and Artemis several times (osoulum quale Praxi teles habere Dianam credidit, Petron.), and numerous other statues of deities by Praxiteles. SiUig C. A. p. 387. On the encaustic treatment of the statues of Praxiteles, §. 310. 1 28. A like spirit of art animated Leochares, whose Gany- 1 102 HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Per, III. mede was an equally noble and charming conception of the favourite of Zeus borne upwards by the eagle, although the 2 subject had always a questionable side. The striving after personal charms still more predominates in the Hermaphro dite, an artistic creation for which we are probably indebted 3 to Polycles. The tendency to the affecting is shown particu larly in Silanion's dying Jocasta, a brazen statue, with deadly- 4 pale countenance. Timotheus (§. 125, R. 4) and Bryaxis also seem to have been fellow -artists and contemporaries of Praxiteles ; they both ornamented the tomb of Mausolus 5 jointly with Scopas and Leochares, after 01. 106, 4 (§. 149). There were likewise portrait-statues of Macedonian princes by Leochares and Bryaxis, and in Athens itself [where Deme- 6 trius erected models, §. 123, 2,] many artists were employed on honorary statues (comp, §. 420). All the masters just named (only information is wanting as to Timotheus) were Athenians ; they form together with Scopas and Praxiteles the newer school of Athens. 1. Leochares (fecit) aquilam sentientem quid rapiat in Ganymede, et cui ferat, parcentemque unguibus (fitiioftivxig ovix^'mi, Nonn. xv, 281) eti am per vestem, PUn. xxxiv, 19, 17. comp. Straton, Anthol. Pal. xu, 221. The statue in the M. PioCl. iu, 49, is a decided imitation. It represents the devotedness of the favourite boy to the erastes in the aUusive man ner of antiquity. For that the eagle denotes the lover himself, is brought out more clearly for example on the coins of Dardanus (Choiseul, Gouf fier Voy. Pitt. u. pi. 67, 28), where the subject is more boldly handled. Ganymede is therefore even placed together with Leda, as in the por tico at Thessalonica (Stuart, Ant. of Athens ui. chap. 9. pi. 9. 11), as mascula and muliebris Venus. Hence it is probable that this concep tion of ancient art (§. 361) also belongs to the same period. 2. Polycles Hermaphr. nobUem fecit, PUn. That the elder Polycles, of this period, is here meant, becomes stiU more probable from observing that in Pliny xxxiv, 19, 12 sqq. the alphabeticaUy enumerated plastse stand again under each letter in the same way that they were found af ter one another in the historical sources (a rule which is tolerably gen eral, and by which perhaps the age of some other artists can be deter mined) ; accordingly this Polycles Uved before Phoenix the scholar of Lysippus. Whether his hermaphrodite was standing or lying (§. 392, 4), is a question difficult to answer. 3. On the Jocasta see Plut. de aud. poet. 3. Quajst. Syrn. v, 1. 5. By Leochares, statues of Amyntas, Philip, Alexander, Olympias, and Burydice, of gold and ivory, Paus. v, 20 ; of Isocrates, Plut. Vit. x. Oratt. A king Seleucus by Bryaxis. Polyeuctos against Demades asks, in Apsines Art. Rhetor, p. 708, whether an honorary statue held a shield, the akrostoUon of a ship, a book, or prayed to the gods ? [Lungin. de invent, ed, Walz T, ix. p. 545.] 6. Even the reliefs on the Choregic monument of Lysicrates (§. 108) — Dionysus and his satyrs quelling the Tyrrhenians^may show clearly SCULPTURES OF XANTHUS, 103 the state of art at Athens during this period; disposition and design exceUent,, the expression in the highest degree animated, the execution however already less careful. Stuart i. oh. 4. Meyer, Gesch. Tf 25 — 27. D. A. K. Tf 27. comp. §. 385. [128.* Here lies the extreme boundary beyond which the second large monument on the acropolis of Xanthus cannot be brought down. It was not till his third journey that Sir Richard Fellows, after the most assiduous excavation, had the good fortune to discover the widely scattered constituent parts, out of which he afterwards ingeniously attempted to re-construct in design the building known under the name of mausoleum, or monument in honour of Harpagus. And it is still a question whether this restoration of the Ionic building can establish, with complete certainty, that the statues, which even surpass the Maenads of Scopas in boldness and lightness of representation, belonged to the building whose masterly friezes point rather to the time of the Phigalian sculptures. There are two of these friezes, the one 3 f 4 in,, the other 1 f 11 in, high, the larger one consisting of twelve marble tablets. The composition as a whole and the connexion of particular parts has not been ascertained, as only a portion has been discovered. The larger frieze exhibits a battle with the fire and animation of the representations of PhigaUa, but a real battle, and with the imitation of reality even in the accoutrements of the combatants, by which it is difficult to distinguish the two sides. There are distinctly to be seen, Ionic hoplitse in long drapery, Lycians such as Herodotus (vu, 92) describes them, others wear anaxyrides, the archers' leathern armour ; two kinds of helmets, the laiseion (Philostr. Imag. p. 323). On five tablets there are hopUtse fighting with horsemen, on others merely foot soldiers, the most diversified battle groups. The lances, swords and bows were not expressed ; only as an exception to this principle we find a shaft in marble, and a hole for inserting the sword in the hand. On the smaUer frieze is represented the capture of a city, a defeat outside, which is viewed from the walls by the besieged, attack on the principal gate, a saUy, storming ladders placed against weU manned, triple walls towering above one another, ambassadors surrendering the city. Before the conqueror with Phrygian cap and mantle, who is seated on a throne and over whom a parasol is held (a sign of the high est rank, which passed from the Persians to Egyptians, and is even in use at the present day in Marocco, that of the imperial prince among the spoUs of the French), two old men stand speaking, accompanied by five men in armour. On a corner stone there are prisoners, who are not soldiers, led away with their hands tied at their backs. DetaUed descrip tions given by Sam. Birch, Britannia xxx. p. 192 — 202 (with explana tions which are to be received with caution), and E. Braun in the N. Rhein. Mus. ui. S. 470., afterwards enlarged in the Archaol. Zeit. 1844. S. 358 ff. comp. BuU. 1846. p. 70. Now, these scenes are referred to the conquest of Xanthus by the general of Cyrus; on this point there is hitherto no disagreement with Sir C. FeUows (Xanthian Marbles 1842. p. 39). Col. Leake indeed assumes (Transact, of the R. Soc. of Liter. Second Series i. p. 260 ss.), on account of the style, that the monument 104 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. IIL of Harpagus was not raised soon after the taking of the city (01. 58, 3), but on the contrary not tiU about 01. 70, perhaps by the grandson of Harpagus, who figures in Herodotus 01. 71, 4 ; judging from it, we might rather come down another century (01. 95) " or two ; " but the history of Asia Minor after Alexander wiU not allow this. However, we may abide by the one century, as we would besides think of the period of Scopas and Praxiteles, and this objection of history against the evidence of the style as to the age is removed : Sir Edward Head also (in the Classical Museum, No. u.), although he agrees with Leake in other respects (p. 224. 228) assigns the monument to 01. 83 or 96, or even later (p. 230). But the contents of the frieze itself are opposed to this suppo sition : they are not merely different from the history ifi details as Leake apologetically admits, but entirely and essentiaUy, and are even in some measure directly the opposite. After the Xanthians had been driven back into the city by the masses of Harpagus, they collected together their wives and children, their slaves and other property, in the acropolis, consumed them with fire, and then, bound by a fearful oath, they rushed upon the enemy, and sought in combat a common death, so that Xanthus received an entirely new population, with the exception of eighty heads of families who were in other countries at the time of the destruction. It is impossible therefore that the Persians, who passed over the dead into the open acropolis, could be represented negotiat ing with the Xanthians during the heat of the storming, nearly about the time when the true history, — whose peculiar nature does not admit a weU-grounded suspicion of distortion or exaggeration, and which could neither be artistically concealed nor forgotten in general, — was related by Herodotus or soon after. Add to this, that the frieze does not exhibit any Persians fighting, who must have been conspicuous in the army of Har pagus above the Ionian and JSolian auxiliaries. So important an histo rical representation compels us therefore to resort to another supposition. The Xanthians who also defended their city with simUar obstinacy against Alexander, and again destroyed themselves with their wives and chUdren in the war of Brutus and the Triumvirs, after the enemy had effected an entrance by stratagem, might have also at an early period have made an attempt, like the lonians, to shake off the Persian yoke, the bad result of which was triumphantly and threateningly presented by this monument to the eyes of their descendants ; it is probable, however, that this would not have been passed over by Herodotus. Or the representation of the conquered city does not refer to Xanthus, but to external deeds of the Persian commissary in Xanthus, as the Greek verses on the pUlar of peace from Xanthus mentioned by Appian, and now in London, covered over with Lycian characters, extol the son of a Harpagus for proving himself in the laud-fight (xH^l ¦a-xf^nv) the best among aU the Lycians — who fought therefore along with, not against him — destroyed many fortresses, and procured for his kinsmen a share of the dominion (the conquered foreign cities, under the royal sanction). This was probably in the war with Euagoras, who also caused CiUcia to revolt, and was beaten by the Persians in a sea fight, 01. 98, 2, and six years afterwards in Cyprus itself (Franz in the Archaol. Zeit. 1844. S. 279). The lonians, then, were here also mercenaries in the service of Artaxerxes, as there were probably Arcadians fighting on the other side, the Swiss of antiquity, as we know from ancient comedy. Of the two pediments, there are pre- PLASTIC ART. 105 served the half of one with a battle scene, and pieces of the other with two gods enthroned and standing figures probably with thank-offerings to the gods for the victory, and this perhaps on the fa§ade. Among the statues of different size, for the most part very incomplete, which Sir C. FeUows has placed in the intercolumnia of the front and back pediments and on the acroteria, our admiration is most excited by the female figures which are represented hastening away, either inclined to the right or left, in highly animated movement, partly looking round, whereby the not less bold than inventive hand of the master has devel oped so many beauties in Unes of the body — to which the seemingly transparent drapery adheres — and the flying masses of drapery, that in consideration of them we may easUy overlook what is amiss or incom plete in the rapid execution. These peculiarities of treatment may be distinguished from antique hardness. On the pUnths of these figures there is a fish, a larger fish, a lobster, a spiral sheU, a bird which we must in this connexion take to be a sea-bird, not a dove ; and besides those figures with their corresponding signs, we may also assume that there were similar animals attached to two similar figures which be longed to the series, although they are wanting with the greater portion of the whole. Now, if these symbols evidently indicate Nereids, we can only conceive their flight to be occasioned by the disturbance of their realm from a sea-fight, such as that against Euagoras, or by a battle on shore, which compeUed the enemy to rush helter-skelter to their ships, as for instance in Herod, v, 116 ; and only on this supposition could Nereids be introduced appropriately on a monument commemorating a victory. In that case they would also furnish a further proof that the capture of Xanthus by the first Harpagus is not represented in the friezes, but rather a later victory of the Persian authorities over a re- beUious outbreak. But the unmistakeable reference of these Nereids to a sea-fight seems also to lend a strong confirmation to the architectonic combination that they belonged to the same building as these friezes. This union of the tumult of battle on shore and (allusively) at sea, with the image of stormed cities, produces a good general effect. In this way was the Assyrian and Persian custom of representing battles (§, 246,* 248. R, 2) here imitated by an Ionian hand and in the purely Greek style. Besides this monument there have been also brought to London from Xanthus, two Uons, the tomb named from the winged chariot with remark able representations (Asia M, p. 228, Lycia p, 165), a frieze of chariot and horsemen (Lycia p, 173), a chase, probably from a tomb, as weU as the procession of peasants paying their tribute in tame and wUd animals and other natural productions (Lycia p. 176), — aU of the best period of art. The foUowing also seem to be very good, the fragments of a battle of Amazons and a festal procession. Ibid. p. 177, BeUerophon vanquish ing the Chimaera, p. 136, which is of colossal size and has also been taken from a tomb ; and not a few cf the reUefs from sepulchral monuments, which represent merely domestic scenes or war (p. 209 does not even seem to form an exception) contain very exceUent and peculiar compositions, p. 116 (comp. the title-plate, where we must read ME202), 118. 135. 141, 166. 178. 197. 198. 200. 206. 207. 208.] 106 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. Ill, 1 129. As the first artists of this school still bore in them the spirit of Phidias, although in a state of transformation, and therefore chiefly endeavoured to express an inward spir itual life in gods or other mythic shapes; so, on the other hand, Euphranor and Lysippus especially continued the Ar- givo-Sicyonic school — that of Polyclitus, the aim of which was always more directed to fine corporeal forms, and the re- 2 presentation of athletic and heroic energy. Among heroes, the character of Hercules was perfected by Lysippus in a new style, and the powerful structure of his limbs, developed by labour and exertion (§. 410), was piled up to that colossal size which the art of later sculptors always strove to at- 3 tain. The statues of athletes did not now occupy the artists so much as formerly, although six sculptures of this kind are quoted as works of the incredibly active Lysippus ; on the contrary it was chiefly idealised portraits of powerful princes 4 that the age demanded. In the form of Alexander, Lysippus even knew how to lend expression to defects, and, as Plutarch says, he alone could duly blend the softness in his eyes and the posture of his neck with what was manly and lion-like 5 in Alexander's mien. Accordingly, his portrait-statues were always animated and skilfully conceived ; whilst, on the con trary, other artists of the time, as Lysistratus, the brother of Lysippus, who was the flrst to take casts of the face in stucco, merely made it the aim of their art to produce a faithful re semblance of the external form before them. 1. Cicero, Brut. 86, 296 (comp. Petron. Satyr. 88), Polycleti Dory phorum sibi Lysippus magistrum fuisse aiebat. Exactly as PolycUtus did §. 120, he executed according to PUny destringentem se. Hence .also why they have been confounded, SUlig C. A. p. 254. N. 7. 2. Euphranor (as painter) primus videtur expressisse dignitates her- oum, PUn. xxxv, 40, 26. — Lysippian statues of Hercules, Sillig C. A. p. 259. a. Hercules reposing for a little from some great undertaking, the Farnesian colossal statue (Maffei, Race. 49. Piranesi, Statue 11. M. Borbon. iii, 23, 24) found in the baths of CaracaUa, under which em peror the statue probably was brought to Rome (Gerhard Neapels Bildw. S. 32.), executed by the Athenian Glycon after an original by Lysippus as is proved by the inscription on an inferior copy (Bianchini, Palazzo del Cesari tv. 18). The hand with the apples is new, the genuine legs were substituted in 1 787 for those by Gugl. deUa Porta. The Hercules with the name of Lysippus is in the Pitti palace, and a second copy with the name FATK-QN at Volterra in the house Guarnacci. The Farnesian statue in Pea's Winckelmann ii. tv. 7. ui. p. 469, a smaUer copy in marble Gal. di Firenze Stat. T. iii. tv. 108, smaU ones in bronze 110. 111. p. 26 sqq. Of little bronze figures there is no reckoning the number, scarcely any other famous original has so many. On the reference of the statue, see Zoega Bassir. ii. p. 86, 0. Jahn Telephos u. Troilos S. 63. A statue precisely simUar is described by Libanius (Petersen, De Libanio Com- PLASTIC ART. 107 ment. ii. Havn. 1827) ; the figure is also often to be met with otherwise in statues and gems, and on coins (Petersen p. 22) ; the head is perhaps surpassed by that in Marbles of the Brit. Mus. i. 11, in depth of expres sion. Comp. Winckelm. W. vi, i. s. 169. ii. s. 166. Meyer, Gesoh. s. 128. D. A. K. Tf 38. b, Hercules resting after the completion of his labours, a colossus at Tarentum, brought by Fabius Max. to the Capitol, after wards taken to Byzantium, described by Nicetas De Statuis Constan- tinop. c. 6. p. 12 ed. WUken. [Fabr. Bibl. Gr. vi. ed. 1. p. 408.] He sat, anxiously stooping, on a basket (in reference to the cleaning of Augeas' staUs), on which lay the Uon's hide, and supported the left arm on his bent knee, the right lay on the right leg which hung down. This is evidently the figure so frequent on gems, in Lippert, Dact, i, 285 — 87. ii, 231. Suppl. 334 — 346, c. Hercules bowed down by the might of Eros, and despoUed of his weapons (Athol, Pal, ii, p, 655, Plan, iv, 103), pro bably preserved in gems in a figure similar in form to the preceding. Lippert, Dact. i. 280, 281. n. 225—27. Suppl. 331. Gal. di Fir. v. tv. 6, 2. 3. d. A smaU bronze Hercules {fnir^x-Tri^iog), described by Statius S. iv, 6, and Martial ix, 44, of the grandest form and serene expression, as if at the banquet of the gods, sitting on a stone covered with the Uon's hide, a goblet in his right hand, the left resting on his club. Evidently (according to Heyne) the model of the Torso (§. 160 and 411). [The Hercules of gilded bronze in the Capitol puts one in mind of Lysippus by its more slender proportions, its longer and less thick neck, and by its exceUence, although it is somewhat injured by mannerism and overload ing in the execution, as is the case with imitations of other masterly compositions. The figure also occurs on coins of Berytus (Rasche Suppl. i. p. 1361) and others.] 3. Euphranor's Alexander et PhiUppus in quadrigis, PUn. Lysippus fecit et Alexandrum Magnum multis operibus a pueritia ejus orsus — idem fecit Hephsestionem — Alexandri venationem — turmam Alexandri, in qua amicorum ejus {irxi^av) imagines summa omnium similitudine expressit (Alexander, around him 25 hetseri, who had faUeu at the Granicus, 9 warriors on foot, see PUn. comp. VeUei. Paterc. i, 11, 3. Arrian i, 16, 7. Plut. Alex. 16) — fecit et quadrigas multorum generum. On Alexander's Edict, SUUg C. A. p. 66. N. 24. 4. Chief statue of Alexander by Lysippus, with the lance (Plut. de Isid. 24) and the later inscription : Aioxaoivri 3' hixev 6 ;ga?ixEOf sig A/a T^ivuauv' Vxv i/'TT ifiol ri^'.^xt, Ziv, ail S' " OT^v^ttov £x~ (Plut. de Alex. virt. ii, 2. Alex. 4. Tzetz. Chil. viii. v. 426, ? is only Osann's conjecture for ro-7toy^xog ; rovioy^xcpog is more likely in the sense which we discover from Vitruvius, from topia ; R. Rochette Suppl. au Catal. des artistes, p. 271 sqq. prefers TOOTyja(po?, although roTTog cannot be pointed out in the sense of landscape.] 3. Examples in PUny xxxv, 7, especiaUy M. Valerius Messala's battle against the Carthaginians in Sicily, 489, and Lucius Scipio's victory over Antiochus about 564. Lucius Hostilius Mancinus in 606 explained to the people himself a picture representing the conquest of Carthage, Triumphs made pictures necessary (Petersen, Einleit, s, 58) ; for that purpose .SlmUius Paulus got Metrodorus from Athens (ad excolendum triumphum), PUn. xxxv, 40, 30. FIFTH PERIOD. FROM THE YEAR 606 OF THE CITY (OLYMPIAD 158, 3) TILL THE MIDDLE AGES. 1. GENERAL REFLECTIONS ON THE CHARACTER AND SPIRIT OF THE TIME. 183. As the whole history of civilized mankind (with the l exception of India), so also was the history of art now concen trated at Rome; but merely through the political supremacy, not on account of the artistic talents of the Romans. The . Romans, although on one side intimately allied to the Greeks, were yet as a whole of coarser, less finely organized materials. Their mind was always directed to those external relations of 2 men to one another, by which their activity in general is 166 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. V. conditioned and determined (practical life) ; at first more to those which concern the community (politics), then, when freedom had outl.ved itself, to those which exist between in- 3 dividuals (private life), especially such as arose with reference to external possessions. To preserve, increase, and protect the res familiaris, was nowhere so much as here regarded as a 4 duty. The careless, unembarrassed, and playful freedom of mind which, heedlessly abandoning itself to internal impulses, gives birth to the arts, was a stranger to thfe Romans ; even religion, in Greece the mother of art, was among them de signedly practical, not only in its earlier form as an emana tion of Etruscan discipline, but also in its later, when the 5 deification of ethico-political notions prevailed. This practical tendency, however, was among the Romans combined with a taste for magnificence which despised doing things by halves, or in a paltry style, which satisfied every necessity of life in a complete and comprehensive manner by great undertakings, and thereby upheld architecture at least among the arts. 3. Compare on this point (a principal cause of the great perfection of the civU law) Hugo's History of Law, eleventh ed. p. 76. Juvenal xiv. shows how avaritia was inoculated in the young as good husbandry. Horace often places as iu A. P. 323. the economico-practical education of the Romans in contrast with the more ideal culture of the Greeks. Om nibus, diis, hominibusque, formosior videtur massa auri, quam quidquid ApeUes, Phidiasque, GrsecuU deUrantes, fecerunt. Petron. 88. 1 184. The character of the Roman world in reference to art, throughout this period, can be best understood if viewed in 2 four stages: 1st. From the conquest of Corinth to Augustus. The endeavours of the great to impose, and to gain the people by the magnificence of triumphs, and games of unprecedented 3 splendour, drew artists and works of art to Rome. In indi viduals there was awakened a genuine taste for art, for the most part indeed united with great .luxury, like the love for 4 art of the Macedonian princes. The charm of these enjoy ments was only enhanced in private life by the resistance of a party who cherished old-Roman predilections, although in 5 public life these had apparently the ascendancy. Hence Rome was a rallying point for Greek artists, among whom there were many of great excellence who vied with the an- 6 cients; artistic science and connoisseurship here fixed their seat. 2. See §. 182, 3. M. .fflmiUus Scaurus, SuUce privignus, in 694. brought to Rome for his games as sedile the pledged statues of Sicyon, PUn. xxxv, 40, 24. xxxvi, 24, 7. Pictures also were spoiled from want of skiU, in cleaning for such purposes, xxxv, 36, 19. In Cicero's time magistrates often lent one another works of art from a distance, Cic. Verr. iv. 3. CHARACTER OF THE PERIOD. 167 Scenographic pictures, in which iUusion was the highest aim, were also employed at the games. Plin. xxxv, 7. 4. See Cato's speech (657), Liv. xxxiv, 4. Plin. xxxiv, 14. Cicero was afraid to be held by the judges a connoisseur in art : nimirum didici etiam dum in istum inquire artificum nomina. Verr. iv, 2, 7. Cicero's love for art, however, was very moderate, see Epp. ad Div. vii, 23. Parad. 5, 2. Not so with Damasippus, Epp. ibid. Herat. Sat. u, 3, 64. 6. The intelligentes stood in contradistinction to the iliurxi, Cic. ibid. But evenPetronius' Trimalchio says amid the most ridiculous explanations of art : Meum enim intelUgere nulla pecunia vendo. Important passages on connoisseurship in Dionys. de Dinarcho, p. 664. de vi Dem. p. 1108. [ Juv. i, 56 doctus spectare lacunar.] The test was : non inscriptis auc- torem reddere signis, Statius, SUv. iv, 6, 24. The idiotoe, on the contrary, were often deceived with famous names. Beck, De Nom. Artif in Mo num. artis interpolatis. 1832. 185. II. The Time of the Julii and Flavii, 723 to 848 1 A. u. (96 A. D.). Prudent princes, by means of magnificent undertakings which also procured to the common people ex traordinary comforts and enjoyments, brought the Romans into entire oblivion of political life; half insane successors, by the gigantic schemes of their folly, gave still ample occu pation to the arts. Although art even in such times must 2 have been far removed from the truth and simplicity of the best ages of Greece, still, however, it everywhere manifested during this ijentury spirit and energy ; the decline of taste is yet scarcely observable. 1. The saying of Augustus : that he would leave the city mxirmorea which he had received lateritia. Nero's burning and rebuilding. 186. III. From Nerva to the so-called Triginta Tyranni, I 96 to about 260 years after Christ. Long-continued peace in the Roman empire; splendid undertakings even in the pro vinces; a transitory revival of art in Greece itself through Hadrian; magnificent erections in the East. With all this 2 zealous and widely-extended exercise of art, the want of in ternal spirit and life is shown more and more distinctly from the time of the Antonines downwards, along with the striv ing after external show; vapidity and inflation combined, as in oratory and literature. The force of the spirit of Greco- 3 Roman culture was broken by the inroad of foreign ideas; the general want of satisfaction with the hereditary religions, the blending together of heterogeneous superstitions must have been in many ways pernicious to art. The circumstance 4 that a Syrian sacerdotal family occupied for a while the Ro man throne had considerable influence. Syria and Asia Mi- 5 nor were at that time the most flourishing provinces, and an Asiatic character emanating from thence, is clearly observable in the arts of design as well, as in literature. 168 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. V. 3. The worship of Isis, which made violent intrusion about the year 700 a. u. and often served as a cloak to Ucentiousness, became graduaUy so prevalent that Commodus and CaracaUa openly took part in it. — The worship of Mithras, a mixture of Assyrian and Persian reUgion, became first known in the Roman world through the pirates, before Pompey, and was estabUshed at Rome from the time of Domitian, and stiU more from the time of Commodus. The Syrian worship was in favour even under Nero, but became prevalent particularly from the time of Septi- mius Severus. — Add to this, the Chaldsean GenethUology ; Magic amu lets, §. 206 ; theurgic phUosophy. Comp. Heyne, Alexandri Severi Imp. reUgiones misceUasprobantis judicium, especially Bpim. vi. : de artis fin- gendi et sculpendi corruptelis ex religionibus peregrinis et superstitioni- bus profectis, Opusc. Acadd. vi, p, 273. 4. Genealogy also is of importance to the history of art : Bassianus Priest of the sun at Emesa \ Julia Domna Julia MMSi. the wife of Septimius Severus | \ \ Bassianus ' Septimius Scemias Julia Mamm.«a CaracaUa Geta by a Roman senator by a Syrian I I Heliogabalus Severus Alexander. 1 187. IV. From the Triginta Tyranni to the Byzantine times. 2 The ancient world declined, and with it art. The old Roman patriotism lost, through political changes and the powerless- ness of the empire, the hold which the rule of the Csesars had 3 still left it. The living faith in the gods of heathendom dis appeared ; attempts to preserve it only gave general ideas for personal substances. At the same time was altogether lost the manner of viewing things to which art is indebted for its existence,— the warm and living conception of external nature, 4 the intimate union of corporeal forms with the spirit. A dead system of forms smothered the movements of freer vital power; the arts themselves were taken into the service of a tasteless half-oriental court-parade. Before the axe was laid externally to the root of the tree the vital sap was already dried up within. 2. ARCHITECTONICS. I 188. Even before the Csesars Rome was provided with all kinds of edifices which seemed necessary to adorn a great 2 city, after the manner of the Macedonian structures; — ele- STRUCTURES AT THE CLOSE OF THE REPUBLIC. 169 gantly built temples, although none of considerable extent; curiw and basilicce, which became more and more necessary to the Romans as places of assembly and business, as well as markets {fora) surrounded with colonnades and public build ings; buildings also for games which the Roman people was formerly accustomed to see even although magnificent, con structed only for a short duration, were now built of stone and in gigantic masses. In the same way luxury in pri vate buildings, after it had timidly and hesitatingly taken the first steps, soon advanced rapidly and unprecedently to a great height; at the same time the streets were crowded with monuments, and superb villas swallowed up the space destined for agriculture. 2. Temple of Honor and Virtus buUt by the architect C, Mutius for Marius, according to Hirt u. s. 213; others (as Sachse i. s. 450)' hold it to be that of MarceUus, §. 180. Rem. 2. The new capitol of SuUa and Catulus with unaltered plan, dedicated in 674. The temple of Yenus Genitrix on the Forum JuUum, vowed in 706 ; Temple of Divus J-uUus, begun in 710. 3. The Curia of Pompey 697 ; the magnificent BasiUca of .^miUus Paulus, the consul 702, with Phrygian columns (BasiUca .SlmiUa et Ful- via, Varro de L. L. vi. §. 4). The BasiUca JuUa, which Augustus com pleted and then renewed, at the south-west corner of the Palatine. See Gerhard, DeUa BasiUca GiuUa. R. 1823. Adjoining it was the new Forum .JuUum, completed by Augustus. On the design of a Forum §. 295. 4. In the year 694 M. .^mUius Scaurus as sedile fitted up magnifi cently a wooden theatre ; the wall around the stage consisted of three tiers of piUars (episcenia), behind which the waU was of marble below, then of glass, and then of gUded wainscot : 3,000 brazen statues, many pictures and tapestries. Curio the tribune's (702) two wooden theatres were united into an amphitheatre. Pompey's theatre (697), the first of stone, for 40,000 spectators, was copied from that of Mitylene.- On the upper circuit stood a temple of Venus Victrix. Hirt ui. s. 98. [Canina sul teatro di Pompeo in the Mem. d. acad. Archeol. 1833.] The first am phitheatre of stone erected by StatiUus Taurus under Augustus, The circus Maximus was fitted up for 150,000 men in the reign of Csesar. 5. The censor L. Crassus was much censured about the year 650 on account of his house with six small columns of Hymettic marble. The first that was faced with marble (a luxury which now crept in) belonged to Mamurra, 698 ; but even Cicero lived in a house which cost llsxxxv, that is J26,090. Mazois, Palais de Scaurus, fragm. d'un voyage fait k Rome vers la fin de la republ. par Merovir prince des Su&ves. In Ger man with notes by the brothers Wiistemann. Gotha 1820. 6. LucuUus' vUlas, Petersen Einl. p. 71, Varro's Ornithon (after the tower of the Winds at Athens, de R, R, iu, 3). Monument of Csecilia MeteUa, the wife of Crassus, almost the only ruin of that time. — Archi tects in the time of Cicero, Hirt u. s. 267. Cyrus in Cicero's letters. 170 HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Per. V. 1 189. In the time of the first Csesars Roman architecture in public buildings cultivated a character of grandeur and magnificence, which was certainly the most conformable to the relations and ideas of a people that governed the world. 2 Pillars and arches took their place in considerable buildings as a leading form, together with the columns and their entab lature, while at the same time the fundamental law was ob served that both forms, but each preserving its own place, should go side by side, so that the arches formed the internal construction of the building, the columns the external front, and where no roof rested upon their entablature should fulfil 3 their end as supports to statues. However, there were more severe scholars of the Greek masters, such as Vitruvius, who were even already forced to complain of the mixture of hete- 4 rogeneous forms; a reproach, that must also indeed apply to the so-called Roman capital which did not make its appear ance till after Vitruvius. Purity of architecture required to be even at that time learned from the edifices of the Grecian mother country and Ionia. 3, See Vitruv. i, 2, iv, 2, on the blending of the Ionic dentels with the Doric triglyphs. It is found exempUfied in the theatre of Marcellus. Vitruvius complains more loudly of scenography which mocked at aU architectonic principles, §, 209, 4, The Roman or Composite capital places the Ionic corner-capital entire over the lower two-thirds of the Corinthian, into which however the former had been already taken up in the most suitable manner ; it loses thereby all unity of character. The columns are carried to a height of 9 to 91 diameters. First introduced in the arch of Titus. 1 190. Augustus, with a true princely disposition, compre hended all branches of a Roman order of architecture: he found the field of Mars still for the most part unoccupied, and together with Agrippa and others converted it into a superb city agreeably interspersed with groves and verdant 2 lawns, which eclipsed all the rest of the city. The succeed ing emperors crowded with their buildings more around the Palatine and the Via Sacra; one enormous fabric here arose 3 on the ruins of another. In the room of the gigantic edifices of Nero, which only ministered to the debauchery and vanity of the builder, the Elavil planted structures of public util ity; in their time, -however, a perceptible decline of good taste 4 took place. A terrible event in the reign of Titus has pre served to posterity the animated spectacle of a whole Roman country-town, in which, notwithstanding the utmost econ omizing of space, and on the whole a slight and cheap style of building, there are to be found nearly all kinds of public buildings which a capital possessed, and a taste for elegant form and pleasing ornament are seen everywhere diffused. ARCHITECTURAL WORKS OF THE EMPERORS. 171 1. Under Augustus (Monum. Ancyranum) : I. In Rome. a. BuUt by the Emperor. Temple of Apollo Palatinus, completed in 724, of Carrara, and the colonnades around of Punic marble ; libraries in it. Sachse u. s. 10. Petersen Einl. s. 87. Temple of Jupiter Tonans, now of Saturn (three Corinthian columns together with entabla ture on the Capitoline hiU are remains of a restoration, Desgodetz, Les Edifices Antiques de Rome, ch. 10) ; of Quirinus, a dipteros ; of Mars Ultor on the capitol, a smaU monopteros, which we still see on coins, and in the forum of Augustus a large temple, of which three columns still remain. Piale, Atti deU' Ace. Archeol. Rom. ii. p. 69. The Roman/o?'a according to Bunsen, Mon. d. Instit. ii, 33. 34. Theatre of Marcellus, built into the Palace Orsini, 378 feet in diameter (see Guattani M. I. 1689, Genu. Febr. Piranesi, Antichitk Rom. T. iv. t. 25 — 37. Desgodetz, ch. 23). Portico of Octavia (formerly of MeteUus) together with a curia, schola, library and temples — a vast structure. A few Corinthian columns of it remaining, as is thought (comp. Petersen Einl. s. 97 ff). Mausoleum of Augustus toge ther with the Bustum on the field ©f Mars beside the Tiber ; remains of it. Aquoe. Vice. [The bust^at the Corse, Beschr. Roms iii. 3 Einleitung.] b. BuUdings of other great personages (Sueton. August. 29). By M. Agrippa, great harbours and cloacse ; the portico of Neptune or the Argo nauts ; the Septa JuUa and the Diribitorium with enormous roof (PUn. xvi, 76, and xxxvi. 24, 1. e cod. Bamberg. Dio Cass. Iv, 8) ; the large Thermae. The Pantheon formed an advanced building in front (727) ; a circular edifice 132 feet high and broad within, with a portico of 16 Corinthian columns of granite ; the waUs reveted with marble, the lacu naria adorned with gUded rosettes. Brazen beams supported the roof of the portico, the tUes were gUded. Dedicated to the gods of the Julian family (Jupiter as Ultor, Mars, Venus, D. Julius and three others), colossal statues of whom stood in niches. — [Instead of the words Pantheon lovi Ultori in the second passage of PUny, the Cod. Bamb. has vidit orbis : non et tectum diribitorul There are only six niches.] — Other statues in tabernacles, the Caryatides of Diogenes on columns. Colossi of Augus tus and Agrippa in the portico. Restored 202 after Christ. S. Maria Rotonda. Desgodetz, ch. 1. Hirt in the Mus. der Alterthums W. Bd. i. s. 148. Guattani 1789. Sett. Mem. Bncycl. 1817. p. 48. [Beschr. Roms iu, 3. s. 339—69.] Four [legal] documents by Fea. 1806 and 1807, [on the removal of the adjoining houses]. Wiebeking Biirgerl. Baukunst, Tf 24. Rosini's Vedute. By Asinius PolUo the atrium of Libertas with n, bibUotheca and busts of literary men. See Reuvens in Thorbecke, De Asinio PolUone. CorneUus Balbus' Theatre. — Pyramid of Cestius. On the picturesque appearance (scenography) of the Campus Martius at this time, Str. v. p. 266, Comp, Piranesi's imaginative panoramic view : Campus Martius, R. 1762, II. Out of Rome. In Italy the arches in honour of Augustus at Rimini (see Briganti's work), Aosta and Susa (Maffei, Mus. Veron. p. 234. Work by Massazza), which are stUl standing. Road cut through the hiU of PosiUppo by T. Cocceius Auctus. R. Rochette, Lettre k M. Schorn. p. 92. In the provinces, several temples of Augustus and Roma ; ruins at Pola. The stoa of Athena Archegetis at the new forum of 172 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Pee. V. Athens with an equestrian statue of L. Csesar (slender Doric columns) about 750. C. I. n. 342. 477. Stuart i. ch. 1. Remains of a smaU temple of Augustus have been lately discovered (C. I. 478). McopoUs near Ac tium, and near Alexandria built by Augustus. Ara maxima built to Au gustus in 744 by the nations of Gaul, on an inscription in Osann Zeitschr. f. A. W. 1837. s, 387. Sumptuous buUdings by Herod the Great in Ju- dsea (Hirt, in the Schriften der Berl. Acad. 1816) ; the new temple en deavoured to bring the old style of Solomon into harmony with the Greek taste now prevaiUng in architecture. Temple of C, and L. Csesar at Ne- mausus, Nismes, an elegant Corinthian prostyle pseudopeript,, buUt 752 (1 after Christ), Clerisseau, Antiquites de Nismes. Comp, §. 262, 2. 2, The Claudii, The camp of the Prsetorians (a. d. 22) marks the time of Tiberius, and the street-Uke bridge of vessels across the bay of Baise that of CaUgula (Mannert Geogr. ix, 1, s, 731). Claudius' great harbour of Ostia with gigantic moles and a pharos on an artificial island, afterwards stUl more improved by Trajan (Schol, Juven, xu, 76) ; his aqueducts (aqua Claudia et Anio .novus) and draining of the lake Pucinus. [Completed by Hadrian, Martiniere Geogr. Lex. iv. s. 1973 sq.] Bunsen AnnaU d. Inst. vi. p. 24. tav, d'agg. A, B, [L, Canina suUa sta- gione delle navi di Ostia, sul porto di Claudio 1838, Atti del acad. pontef 1 Claudius' triumphal arch on the Flaminian way (on coins, Pedrusi vi. tb. 6, 2), buried ruins of it. Bullet, d. Inst. 1830, p, 81. Palatine palaces of the Csesars, Del palazzo de' Cesari opera postuma da Franc, Bianchini. Ver, 1738. A new Rome regularly built arose from Nero's conflagration (65). The golden house (on the site of the tran^itoria) extended across from the Palatine to the EsquiUne and CseUus, with porticoes several mUlia in length and large parks laid out in the interior, and indescrib able splendour particularly in the dining-haUs. The architects were Celer and Severus... The FlavU destroyed the greatest part; numerous cham bers have been preserved in the EsquiUne, behind the substruction-waUs of the baths of Titus, See Ant. de Romanis, Le antiche Camere Esqui Une 1822, and Canina's Memorie Rom. u. p. 119. comp. §. 210. Nero's baths on the Campus. [Canina sul porto Neroniano di Ostia R. 1837, from the Atti d, acad, pontef] 3. The Flavii, The third capitol, by Vespasian, higher than the ear Uer ones (on coins, Eckhel D, N, iv, p, 327); the fourth, by Domitian, StiU always according to the same ground-plan but with Corinthian pU- lars of PenteUc marble, within richly gilded (Eckhel, p. 377). Temple of Peace, by Vespasian (Eckhel, p. 334) ; extensive ruins on the Via Sa^ era. The cross-arch of the centre-nave was supported by eight Corin thian columns; at each side three subordinate compartments Bra- mante borrowed from them the idea of St. Peter's. According to others it belonged to a basiUca of Constantine (Nibby del tempio d Pace et deUa bas. di Constant. 1819. La bas. di Constant, sbandita deUa Via Sacra per lett. deU' Av. Fea. 1819). Desgodetz, ch. 7. Comp Caristie Plan et Coupe du Forum et de la Voie Sacree. Amphitheatrum Flavi- um (CoUseum) dedicated by Titus, in the year 80, and used at the same time as a Naumachia. The height 158 Parisian feet, the smaU axis 156 (Arena) and 2 X 166 (Seats), the large, 264 and 2 x 156 Desgodetz ch. 21. Guattani 1789. Febr. Marzo. Five small treatises by Fea ARCHITECTURAL WORKS OF THE EMPERORS. 173 Wagner de Flav. Amph. Commentationes. Marburghi 1829 — 1831. comp. §. 290, 3. 4. Titus' palace and thermse. Domitian built many mag nificent edifices, as to which Martial, Stat, Silv, iv, 2, 48, Large domed haU on the Palatium by Rabirius, The Alban citadel (Piranesi, Anti- chitJi d' Albano). Forum PaUadium of Domitian or Nerva with richly decorated architecture ; chamfered corona ; modillions and dentels toge ther ; see Moreau, Fragmens d' Architecture, pi. 7. 8, 11, 12. 13, 14, 17, 18. Guattani 1789. Ottobre. Arch of Titus on the Via Sacra, the architec ture somewhat overloaded, the corona channelled. BartoU, Vet. Arcus August, cum notis I. P. BeUoru ed, lao, de Rubeis 1690, Desgodetz, ch. 17. comp. §. 294, 9. [Gius. Valadier Narraz. artist. deU' operate nel ristauro dell' arco di Tito. In Roma 1822. 4to.] 4. Under Titus (a, D..79), Pompeii, Herculaneum and Stabijs buried. History of their discovery, §. 260. Pompeii is highly interesting as a miniature picture of Rome. A third portion of the city has been laid open, and here there are a principal forum, with the temple of Jupi ter (t), a basilica, the Chalcidicum and Crypta of the Eumachia, and the CoUegium of the Augustales (1), the forum rerum venalium, two theatres (the unroofed one buUt by Antoninus Primus, M. Borbon. i, 38), thermse, numerous temples mostly smaU, among them an Iseum, many private buUdings, in part very stately dwellings provided with atrium and peri style, such as the so-caUed house of Arrius Diomedes, that of SaUust, of Pansa, and those called after the tragic poet and the faun ; the street of sepulchres before the gate towards Herculaneum ; separated from these the amphitheatre to the east. Almost everything on a small scale, the houses low (also on account of earthquakes), but neat, clean, and com fortable, sUghtly buUt with rubble stones, but cast with excellent plaster ; beautiful fioors of particoloured marble and mosaic. The columns mostly of the Doric order with slender shafts, but sometimes Ionic with singular deviations from the regular form, and with a coating of paint (Mazois, Livr. 26), also Corinthian, The most antique structure is the so-caUed temple of Hercules, Much had not yet been -restored after the earth quake of 63 A, D, Principal Books : Antiquites de la Grande Grfece, grav. par, Fr, Pira nesi d'aprls les desseins de J. B. Piranesi et expl. par A, J. Guattani. P, 1804. 3 vols, fo, Mazois' splendid work, Antiquit6s de Pomp6i, begun in 1812, continued since 1827 by Gau, [Completed with the fourth part 1838,] Sir W, GeU and Gandy, Pompeiana or Observations on the Topo graphy, Edifices and Ornaments of Pompeii. L. 1817. New Series 1830, in 8vo, Goro von Agyagfalva's Wanderungen durch Pompeii, Wien 1826. R, Rochette and Bouchet, Pomp&, Choix d'Edifices Inedits, be gun Paris 1828, [contains Maison du pofete trag. broken off at the 3d part, 22 pi,] Cockburn and Donaldson, Pompeu illustrated with pic turesque Views, 2 vols, fo, W. Clarke's Pompeii, translated at Leip zig 1834, M. Borbonico, Comp, §, 260, 2. The latest excavations, BuU. 1837. p. 182. [Engelhardt Beschr. der in Pompeii ausgegrabenen Ge- baude, Berlin 1843, 4to. (from CreUe's Journal for Archit,) The Library of Entertaining Knowledge, Pompeii 2 vols. 2d Bd, London 1833. L. Rossini le antichitk di Pompeii deUn. suUe scoperte fatte sine I'anno 1830. R. fol. max. 75 tav.] 174 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. V. 191. The vast buildings erected by Trajan, the struc tures of Hadrian which vie with everything earlier, and even particular edifices reared under the Antonines, present archi tecture in its last period of bloom, on the whole still as noble and great as it was rich and elegant, although, in particular works, the crowding and overloading with ornaments, to which the time had a tendency, was already very sensible. We find also, even from the time of Domitian, the insulated pedestals of columns (stylobates) which arose from continuous posta- ments (stereobates). They have no other ground and aim than the straining at slender forms and the greatest possible interruption and composition. 1. Trajan's Forum, the most stupendous in all Rome according to Ammian. xvi, 10, with a brazen roof which must have been perforated (Paus. v, 12, 4. X, 6, 6. gigantei contextus, Ammian.) ; many columns and fragments of granite found there recently. In the middle the column (113 A. D.) with the braizen statue of the emperor (now St. Peter). Pe destal 17 feet; base, shaft, capital and pedestal of the statue 100 feet. The shaft 11 feet thick below and 10 above. Composed of cylinders of white marble ; with a stair inside. The band with the reUefs becomes broader as it ascends, which diminishes the apparent height. BartoU's Columna Trajana. [1673. Col. Traj. 134. sen. tabuUs insc, quse olim Mu- tianus incidi cur, cum expl, Ciacconi, nunc a C, Losi reperta imprimitur. R. 1773,] Piranesi's superb work 1770, Raph, Fabretti, De Columna Tra- jani. R. 1683, Against the traces of colours which Semper and others as serted, Morey in the Bull. 1836, p, 39, The Basilica Ulpia adorned with numerous statues, on bronze coins (Pedrusi vi, tb. 25). A great number of architectural works, — thermse, odeion, harbour, aqueduct (on coins). Traj anus herba parietaria. Almost all by ApoUodorus, Dio Cass. Ixix, 4, as likewise the bridge over the Danube, a. n. 105. Comp. Eckhel D. N. vi. p. 419. Arches of Trajan are still in existence at Ancona (very fine, of large masses of stone), and at Benevento, of almost Palmyrenian architecture. Works on these by Giov. di Nicastro and Carlo NoUi. The correspon dence with Pliny the younger shows the Emperor's knowledge, and his interest in the buildings in aU the provinces. Pliny's ViUas (Mustius the architect,) treatises upon them by Marquez and Carlo Fea. Hadrian, himself an architect, put Apollodorus to death from hatred and jealousy. Temple of Venus and Roma, pseudodipt. decast., in a fore court with a double colonnade, chiefly of marble with Corinthian columns, large niches for the statues, beautiful lacunaria and brazen roof. See Caristie, Plan et Coupe n. 4. The front view (with the history of Ro mulus on the pediment) on the bas-relief in R. Rochette M. I. i. pi. 8. Tomb on the further side of the Tiber, described by Procopius, BeU. Goth, i, 22. Now the castle of S. Angelo, Piranesi, Antichitk iv. t. 4— 12. Restorations, Hirt Gesch. Tf 13, 3. 4. 30, 23. Bunsen (after Major Bavari's investigations) Beschr. Roms ii. s. 404. A structure square be low supported a circular building which probably diminished upwards in three stages. [Circus in the neighbourhood of the Mausoleum, a treatise thereon by Canina, 1839, in the Mem. d. Acad. Rom. di Archeol.] Tibur- ARCHITECTURAL WORKS OF THE EMPERORS. 175 tine vUla, full of imitations of Greek and Egyptian buildings (Lyceum, Academia, Prytaneum, Canopus, Poecile, Tempe, [Lesche, in great part preserved] a labyrinth of ruins, 7 mUlia in circuit, and a very rich mine of statues and mosaics. Pianta della vUla Tiburt. di Adriano by Pirro Ligorio and Franc. Contini. R. 1751. Winckelm. vi, 1. s. 291. As euer getes of Greek cities Hadrian completed the Olympieion at Athens (01. 227, 3. comp. C. I. n. 331), and built a new city to which he gave his name ; the arch over the entrance to it is still standing ; there were there a Herseon, Pantheon, and Panhellenion, with numerous Phrygian and Libyan columns. Probably the very large portico 376 X 262 feet, north from the citadel, with stylobates, is also one of Hadrian's edifices. Stuart i. ch. 5 (who takes it to be the Poecile), Leake, Topogr. p. 120. To the Attic monuments of the time belongs also that in commemoration of the Seleucid PhUopappus' admission to the citizenship of Athens, erected in the Museion about the year 114 under Trajan. Stuart iii. ch. 5. Grandes Vues de Cassas et Bence, pi. 3. Bockh C. I. 362. In Egypt Antinoe (Besa), beautifuUy and regularly laid out in the Grecian style, with co lumns of the Corinthian order, but of free forms however. Description de I'Bgypte, T. iv. pi. 53 sqq. Decrianus, architect and mechanician, §• 197. Under Antoninus Pius, the Temple of Antoninus and Faustina, at first probably destined only for the latter, a prostyle with beautiful Corin thian capitals, the cornice already greatly overloaded. Desgodetz 8. Moreau pi. 23. 24. ViUa of the Emperor at Lanuvium. The column in honour of Antoninus Pius erected by Marcus AureUus and Lucius Verus, merely a column of granite, of which nothing more than the marble postament is preserved, in the garden of the Vatican, §. 204, 4 : Vignola de Col. Antonini. R. 1705. [Seconda Lettera del sgr. M. A. de la Chausse sopra la col. d. apoth. di A. P, Nap, 1805.] Column of Marcus AureUus, less imposing than that of Trajan (the bas-relief band is of the same height throughout). [The col. of Marcus AureUus, after P. S. BartoU's designs, by Bellori 1704,] A triumphal arch erected at the same time in the Flaminian way, the reliefs of which are stUl preserved in the palace of the Conservatori. Herodes Atticus, the preceptor of M, AureUus and L, Verus (comp. FiorUlo and Visconti on his inscriptions) showed an in terest in Athens by the embellishment of the stadion and by building an odeion. A theatre at New-Corinth. [A temple, supposed to have been built in the time of the Antonines at Jseckly near Mylasa, Ion. An tiq. i. ch. 4.] 192. After the time of Marcus Aurelius, although the love 1 of building did not cease, a more rapid decline in architectural taste took place. Decorations were crowded to such a degree 2 that all clearness of conception was destroyed, and so many intermediate mouldings were everywhere introduced between the essential members that the principal forms, especially the corona, completely lost their definite and distinctive character. By seeking to multiply every simple form, interrupting the 3 rows of columns together with the entablature by frequent advancings and retirings, sticking half-columns to pilasters. 176 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. V, making one pilaster jut out from another, breaking the ver tical line of the shafts with consoles for the support of sta tues, making the frieze belly out, and filling the walls with a great number of niches and frontispieces, they deprived the column, the pillar, the entablature, the wall and every other member, of its significance and peculiar physiognomy, and together with a bewildering perplexity produced at the same 4 time an extremely tiresome monotony. Although the techni cal construction on the whole was excellent, the workmanship, however, in detail become more and more clumsy, and the care in the execution of the enriched members diminished in pro- 5 portion as these were multiplied. The taste of the nations of Syria and Asia Minor had evidently the greatest influence on this tendency of architecture; and there likewise are to be found the most distinguished examples of this luxuriant and 6 florid style. Even native structures in the East may not have escaped all influence ; the mixtures of Greek with indigenous forms in barbaric countries, which can be pointed out, appear chiefly to belong to this period. 1. Under Commodus, the temple of Marcus AureUus with convex frieze (built into the Dogana). The arch of Septimius Severus, bungled in the design (the middle columns advance without any aim), overloaded with tracery of rude workmanship. [Suaresius Arcus Sept. Sev. R. 1676. fol.] Another arch erected by the Argentarii. Desgodetz, ch. 8. 19. Bel lori. Septizonium quite ruinous in the 1 6th century. A labyrinth built by Qu. Julius Miletus as an institution for the recreation of the people. Welcker, SyUoge, p. xvii. Cakacalla's thermse, an enormous structure with excellent masonwork ; light vaulted roofs of a composition of pu mice-stone, of great span, particularly in the cella solearis (a swimming bath towards the east), comp. Spartian Carac. 9. (The chief mine of the Farnesian statues, the earlier of exceUent, the more recent of ordinary workmanship.) A. Blouet's Restauration des Thermes d'Ant. CaracaUa. On new excavations, Gerhard, Hyperb. Rom. Studien, s. 142. The so- caUed circus of CaracaUa (probably of Maxentius ; the inscription how ever does not entirely decide) before the Porta Capena, badly buUt. Lately laid open. Investigation on the subject by Nibby; Kunstblatt 1825. N. 22. 50. 1826. N. 69. Hbliooabalus dedicated to the god after whom he was named a temple on the Palatium. Severus Alexander, Thermse and other bathing establishments ; many earlier buUdings were then renewed. There are many things besides at Rome which have come down from the time of florid architecture, such as the so-called temples of Jupiter Stator, Portuna ViriUs (now Maria Bgiziana), and Concordia (a later restoration of a temple to Divus Vespasianus, according to Fea). 5. In Syria, Antioch was adorned by almost every emperor with buildings, particularly aqueducts, therma, nymphsea, basilica, xysta, and edifices for games, and its ancient splendour (§. 149) was often restored after earthquakes. At Heliopolis (Baalbeck) the great temple of Baal buUt in the time of Antoninus Pius (Malalas, p. 119. Ven.), peript. decast. 280 X 165 Par. P., with a quadrangular and a hexagonal fore- ARCHITECTURAL WORKS OF THE EMPERORS. 177 court ; a smaUer temple peript. hexast. with a thalamus (comp. §. 163. Rem. 3) ; a strangely designed tholus. R. Wood, The Ruins of Baalbeck, otherwise HeUopolis. L. 1757. Cassas, Voy. pittor. en Syrie ii. pi. 3 — 57. Souvenirs pendant un voy. en orient (1832. 33.) par M. Alph. de Lamar- tine, P. 1836. T. iii. p. 15 sqq. Magnificent description on the temple of the Sun, data by Russegger, in the BuU. 1837. p. 94 sq. Palmyra (Tadmor) sprang up as a place of tratfic in the desert in the first century after Christ, and flourished, after being restored by Hadrian, during the peaceful reign of the Antonines, afterwards as the residence of Odenatus and Zenobia, tiU its conquest by Aurelian. See Heeren, Commentatt. Soc. Gott, rec. vu. p. 39. Diocletian also caused baths and churches to be buUt there, and Justinian renewed them (according to Procopius and Malalas). Temple of Helios (Baal) octast. pseudodipt. 185 X 97 feet, with columns having metal foUage fixed on, in a large court (700 feet long and broad) with Propylsea, on the east. SmaU temple prost. hexast. on the west. Between them a street of columns 3,500 feet in length, an imitation of that at Antioch. Round about ruins of a palace, basUicse, open colonnades, markets, aqueducts, honorary monuments, tombs (that of lambUchus bmlt A. D. 103, of very remarkable architecture) ; for games only a smaU stadium. Wood, The Ruins of Palmyra, otherwise Tadmor. 1753. Cassas i. pi. 26 sqq. In simUar style were laid out the cities of Decapolis, east from the Jordan, especiaUy Gerasa (on which Burck- hardt treats in his Travels in Syria, p. 263, and Buckingham, in greater detaU, Trav. in Palestine, p. 363 sqq. with various plans and sketches) and Gadara (Gamala in Buckingham, p. 44). The same gorgeous and overloaded architecture prevaUed in Asia Minor, as is shown in the tem ple at Labranda (Kiselgick, according to others, Euromus, Choiseul, Gouff. Voy. Pitt. i. pi. 122. Ionian Antiq, i. ch. 4), the monument of My lasa, with columns eUiptical in transverse section (Ion. Ant. ch. 7. pi. 24 sq, Chois, pi, 86 sq,), the ruins of a temple at Ephesus (Ion, Ant, pi, 44, 46. Chois. pi. 122) ; the portico of Thessalonica (Stuart iii. ch. 9) also belongs to this time. In the rock-sepulchres near Jerusalem, especiaUy those caUed the tombs of the kings, the period of which it is difficult to deter mine (Munter Antiq. Abhandl. s. 96 sq. Raumer's Palastina s. 212. 216) there appear simpler forms of Greek architecture ; only the character of the ornaments is oriental (grapes, palms and the Uke), Cassas iii. pi. 19—41. Forbin, Voy. d. le Levant, pi. 38. 6. In the remarkable ruins of Petra, the rock environed and almost inaccessible city of the Nabatheans, which was enriched by the com merce from the Red Sea, there are found rock-built temples with domes, theatres, sepulchres, ruins of palaces ; also colossal statues ; on the whole, Grecian forms, but arbitrarily composed, and disfigured by a love of fantastic multipUcity of forms. See especially Burckhardt, Trav. in Syria, p. 421. Leon de Laborde and Linant, Voy. de I'Arabie Petree, Livr. 2 sqq. Not only do we find an interesting combination of later Roman with native forms in the empire of the Sassanidse (§. 248) but also in that of Meroe, especiaUy at the small temple near Naga (CaU- liaud, Voy. h. Meroe i. pi. 13). 193. Reckoning from the time of the Thirty Tyrants, and 1 still more from that of Diocletian, luxuriance passed over en- M 178 HISTORY OP GREEK ART. [Pee. V. tirely into rudeness which neglected the fundamental forms 2 and principles of ancient architecture. Columnar was so combined with arched architecture that the arches were at first made to rest on the entablature, and afterwards were even made to spring immediately from the abacus in vio lation of the laws of statics, which require undiminished and angular pillars under the arch; at length they went so far as to give the entablature itself, together with the dentels 3 and modillions, the form of an arch. They placed columns and pilasters on consoles, which projected from the walls in order to support arches or pediments ; they began to give the shafts screw-channelled and otherwise convoluted forms. 4 Covering members were on account of the multiplicity of the parts regarded as the principal thing, and were loaded on those lying beneath in a most unwieldy manner, as the cornice was on the entablature in general, and in its separate 5 subordinate parts. The execution was universally meagre, tame and rude, without roundness or effect; there was left however, as a remnant of the Roman spirit, a certain gran deur in the design ; and in the mechanical details things were 6 still done worthy of admiration. In consequence of the new organization of the empire fewer buildings were undertaken 7 at Rome itself, but on the other hand provincial cities, espe cially from the time of Diocletian, flourished with new splen- 8 dour. What injured Rome most was the transference of the throne to Constantinople. 6. GaUienus' arch, of travertine, in a simple style destitute of art. Un der AureUan the walls of Rome were widened, attention to security began (Nibby's statements in Mura di Roma 1821 are not always correct, see Stef Piale in the Dissert. deU' Ace. Archeol. ii. p. 95). Great double temple of Bel and HeUus. Salaried teachers of architecture. Diocle tian's Thermse in tolerable preservation ; the circular haU in the centre, the groined vault of which is supported by eight granite columns, was converted by Michael Angelo in 1660 into the beautiful church S. Maria degli AngeU. Desgodetz 24. Le Terme Diocl. misur. e disegn. da Seb. Oya. R. 1558. Strong castle and vUla of the Ex-emperor near Salona (at Spalatro) in Dalmatia, 705 feet long and broad. Adam's Ruins of the Palace of Diocletian at Spalatro, 1764. fol. The column in honour of Diocletian at Alexandria (otherwise Pompey's pillar) is very large indeed (88| Par, f ) but in bad taste. Descr, de I'Bgypte T, v, pi. 34. Anti quites, T, ii, ch, 26, Append., Norry Descr. de la Colonne de Pomp6e. Hamilton's .Slgyptiaca, pi. 18. Cassas iu. pi. 68. [(§. 149. R. 2). Clarke Tra vels ii, 2. a title plate, Dalton Mus. Gr. et Mg. or Antiquities from draw ings, pi. 43, The shaft is good in style, the capital and base bad, on which account Norry, Leake in the Classical Journal, vol. 13. p. 153, and Wilkinson Topogr, of Thebes 1835, regard it as a Grecian work of the flourishing period of Alexandria, and suppose from the inscription 20 feet high which was restored by ViUoison and Leake, that it was only at last dedicated to Diocletian, J. White .^gyptiaca, Oxf 1801, thought that ARCHITECTURE IN THE DECLINE OF THE EMPIRE. 179 Ptol. PhUad. raised it to his father. Only Zoega de obel. p. 607 has shown that Apthonius in his description of the acropoUs of Alexandria, Progymn. 12 speaks of this column as the far-conspicuous central point of the buUdings on the acropoUs which were derived from the Ptolemies (oigX*' ^^ ¦'¦'''' ''"r'av rri ri/g xiovog xojulpJi ve^ieariixxai), and that the place where it now stands also agrees therewith. This testimony cannot be shaken, although the inscription given by Cyriacus, which says that the column was erected by Alexander the Macedonian (Deinocrates being the architect), and which is defended by Osann in the Memorie d. Inst. archeol. iii. p, 329, cannot be genuine. Accordingly the column did not first proceed from the granite quarries of Syene in the years 205 — 209, as Letronne maintains in Rech. pour servir k Phist. de I'Bg. p. 367, and Journ. des. Sav. 1836. p. 693, and the present author also has Conceded in the HaU. A. L. Z. 1835. Jun. s. 246. that the shaft may have been taken from that column which was erected on the same site in the time of Alexander or the Ptolemies.] The arch of Constantine, adorned with Dacian vic tories from Trajan's arch, the new sculptures very iU proportioned. Baths of Constantine. Tomb of Constantia, the daughter of Constantine (the so-called temple of Bacchus, Desgodetz, ch. 2,), beside the church of S. Agnes ; and of Helena the wife of Julian, a tholus, in the style of the Pantheon, on the Via Nomentana. The corrupt style of architecture at that time, with its twisted and convoluted columns, is not seen so dis tinctly in ruins as on sarcophagi (for example that of Probus Anicius, about 390. BatteUi's Dissertation on it, R, 1706), also on coins of Asia Minor, for instance those of Blaundos under PhUippus Arabs, 7. Besides Rome, the foUowing were places of importance : Mediola- num, on the buildings of which see Ausonius' (died in 390) Clarse Urbes 5, Verona, with the colossal amphitheatre, and the gates built in 265 in three stories with spirally-fluted columns, and pUasters on consoles ; [Count Orti Manara DeUe due antichissime porte esist, in Verona ai tempi de' Romani, Verona 1840, fol,] Treveri, where there are many ruins, the Porta Nigra, a strong work, although rude in detail, comp. §, 264; Narbo, Carthage. 8. At Byzantium, Septimius Severus had already done much in build ing ; the city was now quickly provided with edifices for the requirements of the people and the court. A forum of Augustus, other fora, senatus, regia, the palatium, baths, such as the Zeuxippeion, the hippodrome (Atmeidan), with the obeUsk erected by Theodosius and the serpent- tripod, reputed to be from Delphi. At first temples were also dedicated to Roma and Cybele, Theodosius built the Lauseion and thermse. The anemodulion (somewhat resembUng the Athenian Tower of the Winds) was a remarkable monument. See Nicetus Acom, Narratio de statuis antiq. quas Franci destruxerunt, ed. Wilken, p. 6. For general accounts, Zosimus, Malalas, and other chroniclers, Procop. De MAif. Justiniani, Codinus, and an anonymous author, Antiqq. Cpolitanse, GylUus (died in 1655), Topogr. Cpoleos, Banduri Imperium Orientale, Heyne Serioris artis opera quse sub Imper. Byzant. facta memorantur, Commentat. Soc, Gott. xi. p, 39. There are stiU preserved the obeUsk of Theodosius ; the porphyry column in the ancient forum, 100 feet high, on which stood the statue of Constantine, and afterwards that of Theodosius, renewed by Man. Comnenus ; the marble pointed columns, 91 feet high, which Con- 180 HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Per, V. stantine Porphyrogenitus or his grandson caused to be covered with gilded bronze ; the pedestal of the Theodosian column (§, 207) and some other things of less importance. See Carbognano, Descr, topogr. deUo state presente di -CpoU. 1794, Pertusier, Promen. Pittoresques dans Constantinople, 1815. V. Hammer's ConstantinopoUs und der Bosporus, 2 bde 1822. Raczynski's Malerische Reise, s. 42 ff. Among the princi pal buUdings were the aqueducts (such as that of Valens), and the cis terns, large fabrics, but petty in detail, which also prevailed in other parts of the Bast (for example at Alexandria, Descript. de I'Bgypte T. v. pi. 36. 37), aud served as models for Arabic buildings. In Byzantium there are eight, partly open, partly vaulted over with smaU domes ; only one stUl used, that beside the hippodrome 190 X 166 feet large, in three stories, each of which consists of 16 X 14 columns. The columns are mostly Corinthian, but also with other quite abnormal capitals. Walsh's Journey from Constantinople to England, ed. 2. 1828. Count Andreossy's Constantinople et le Bosphore. P. 1828. L. iii. ch. 5. 8. 1 194. During this period was developed the Christian church-architecture, not from the Grecian temple, but, con formably to the wants of the new religion, from the basilica, inasmuch as old basilicas were sometimes fitted up for that purpose, and sometimes new ones built, but after Constantine 2 chiefly with plundered pieces of architecture. A portico (pro naos, narthex), the interior entirely roofed, several aisles, the central one higher, or all equally high ; behind in a circular recess (concha, sanctuarium) the elevated tribune. By length ening this and adding side-porticoes, the later form of Italy 3 arose. Besides these, there were at Rome as baptisteries par ticular round buildings, whose form and disposition were de rived from the bath-rooms of the Romans (§. 292, 1 ) ; but in the East, even as early as Constantine, churches also were 4 built of a round form with wide-vaulted cupolas. This form was on the whole very grandiose, although in the individual parts developed in a paltry taste in the church of St. Sophia, which was erected in the time of Justinian ; it afterwards be came prevalent in the Eastern empire, and even the later Greek churches, with their main and subordinate cupolas, pay 0 homage to this taste. The edifices of the Ostrogothic time, especially from Amalasuntha downwards, did not probably arise without the influence of Byzantine architects. 1. Church of Saint Anges founded by Constantia, the daughter of Constantine, a basiUca with three aisles, and with two ranges of columns, one above the other. A five-aisled basilica of S. Paul outside the waUs, according to some, by Constantine, the columns of different kinds, as also in St. John of the Lateran, the curious carpenter-work originally overlaid with gold; recently burned down (Rossini's Vedute). N. M. Nicolai DeUa BasiUca di San Paolo. R. 1816 foL The five-aisled basilica of St. Peter on the Vatican (Bunsen, Beschreibung von Rom ii. s. 50 sq.) connected by porticoes with the bridge across the Tiber as St. Paul's was with the city. St. Clemens, a model of the ancient disposition of basilicas. CHRISTIAN ARCHITECTURAL WORKS. 181 Gutensohn and Knapp, Monumenti della Rel. Christiana R. begun 1822. Besides, Agincourt, Hist, de I'Art par les monumens depuis sa decadence, T. iv. pL 4 — 16.64. Platner, Beschreibung Roms, i. s. 417. The descrip tion of the church buUt by Constantine at Jerusalem corresponded in aU the main points with these Roman basilicas, Euseb. V. Const, iii, 25 — 10 ; the same remark applies to the Church of the Apostles built by Constantine and Helena at Byzantium, Banduri, T. ii. p. 807. Par. 3. The so-caUed Baptistery of Constantine is a circular building of this sort, Ciampini 0pp. T. ii. tb. 8. On the Baptistery in St. Peter's, Bunsen ii. s. 83. The description by a rhetor (Walz Rhetores i. p. 638) of a Bap- tisterion (^.s/xveiov Bx-jmurov) with rich mosaics in the cupola over the baptismal font is particularly interesting. The oldest example of a round church is the cathedral of Antioch, built also by Constantine, of octagonal plan, similar in construction to the church of San Vitale (Rem. 5) with very high and wide cupola, Euseb. iii. 50. Dronke and Lassaulx Mat thias KapeUe bei Kobern, s. 51. a list of 61 round and polygonal churches. 4. The church of Saint Sophia was rebuilt by Isidore of Miletus and Anthemius of TraUes before 537. The dome {r^ou'KXog), resting on four piUars, was restored after an earthquake in 564 by the younger Isidore. It was now more durable, but not so imposing. Under the dome was the ie^xriiov, in the gaUeries at the sides the places for men and women, in front the narthex. Procop. I, 1, Agathias v, 9, Malalas p. 81. Ven. Cedrenus p. 386. Anonym, in Banduri Imp. Or. i. p. 65. ch. ii, p. 744. — Other architects and finxxvovoioi of the time : Chryses of Alexandria and Joannes of Byzantium. 6. In Ravenna there is the church of San Vitale, which is quite peri- pherically buUt, on an octagonal ground-plan, with rude forms in the capi tals of the columns, a buUding of the last Gothic period ; Justinian caused it to be adorned with mosaic work by Julianus Argentarius, and to be provided with a narthex (Rumohr, Ital. Forschungen iii, s, 200), Agin court iv, pi, 18. 23. Theodoric's Mausoleum (at least a work of the time), now S. Maria Rotonda, is a buUding composed of very large blocks of freestone, and of simple although heavy forms. Smirke, Archseologia xxiu, p, 323. Comp. Schorn Reisen in Italien s. 398 f , and on Theodoric's buildings in Rome, Ravenna, and Ticinum [on the height at Terracina], see Manse's Gesch. des 0. Gothischen Reichs s. 124. 396 i. Rumohr s. 198 ff. speaks against the derivation of Italian structures from Byzan tium. Aloisius, architect at Rome about 500 a. d. Cassiodor. Var. ii. 39. — BeUermann Die seltesten christlichen BegrabnissteUen, im Besondern die Katacomben zu Neapel mit den Wandgemalden, Hamb. 1839. 4to. At Rome we have only further to mention the column of the emperor Phocas (F. A. Visconti, Lett, sopra la col. deU' Imp, Foca, 1813) erected about the year 600 ; it was plundered from another monument, 195. Througkthe new requirements of a new religion, and 1 the fresh spirit which the subversion of all relations breathed at least here and there into a now decrepit race, architecture received a new spark of life. The forms indeed continued 182 HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Per. V. rude in detail, nay they always became more and more clumsy and disproportioned, but at the same time, however, the works of the Justinian and Ostrogothic period manifested a freer and more peculiar feeling, which conceived more clearly the signi ficance of the building as a whole than was the case with the latest Roman architects; and the vast spaces of the basili cas, with their simple lines and surfaces undisturbed by mosaic work, produced a more powerful impression than the over-rich 2 Palmyrenian architecture. This style of architecture (the early Gothic, the Byzantine) quickened anew for new ends, and in almost all individual forms still remaining allied to the later Roman style, prevailed throughout Christian Europe during the first half of the Middle Ages, fostered and perfected by the architectural corporations which were kept up from Roman antiquity, and perhaps always continued in connexion 3 with Greece. It prevailed until the Germanic spirit, out flanking that of southern Europe, began thoroughly to alter the Roman forms according to an entirely new system, and in conformity with its own fundamental ideas and feelings. 4 The pointed gable and arch, and the least possible interrup tion in the continuation of the vertical lines denote the ex ternal, climatic, as well as the internal fundamental tendencies rooted in the mind, of this style of architecture so directly opposed to the ancient, but which never became altogether naturalized in Italy, and was therefore very quickly expelled in the fifteenth century by the revived architecture of the times of the Roman emperors. 2, Passages where architectural works are characterized in the 10th and 11th century by more Grmcorum, ad consuetudinem Groecorum, and mention is also made of Grecian architects, in StiegUtz iiber die Go- thische Baukunst, s. 67. General assembly of masons at York in 926 ? 3. The so-called Gothic architecture in Italy and England is described as opus Teutonicum and the Uke, see FioriUo Gesch, der Kunst in Deutsch- ^nd ii. s. 269 ff, Vasari sometimes caUs it siilo Tedesco, sometimes "otico. 3, THE PLASTIC ART. 196, Artists flocked more and more from the conquered countries to Rome ; at the time of Sylla, Pompey, and Octa vian, we find that nearly all the eminent toreutae, brass-casters, and sculptors that then existed, were assembled at Rome. Pasiteles distinguished himself as a very industrious and care ful artist, who never worked but from accurately finished models. The models of Arcesilaus were in themselves more highly prized than the statues of other artists. Decius ven- SCULPTURE AT THE CLOSE OF THE REPUBLIC, 183 tured to measure himself with Chares in brass-casting, and everywhere was manifest the influence of the restoration of art produced by the study of the best models, which took its rise principally from Athens. Neither was there any lack of 3 workers in vessels, although none came up to those of earlier times ; wherefore argentum vetus was used as synonymous with finely-wrought. In coins the best age did not begin till the 4 year 700 ; we have denarii of that time which rival the coins of Pyrrhus and Agathocles in delicacy of workmanship and beauty of design, although indeed the spirit and grandeur of earlier Greek coins are still found wanting in these, 2. Pasiteles from Magna Grecia, toreutes and brass-caster, Civis Rom. 662 ; he executed perhaps sometime earlier the statue for MeteUus' temple of Jupiter, Plin, xxxvi, 4, 10, 12, comp, however SiUig Amalth. iu, 294. Colotes, a scholar of Pasiteles, toreutes about 670 (?), Stephanus, a scholar of Pasiteles, sculptor (Thiersch, Epochen s. 296) about 670. Tlepolemus, modeUer in wax, and Hiero, painter, brothers, of Cibyra, Ver res' canes venatici, about 680, Arcesilaus, plastes, brass-caster, and sculptor, 680 — 708, (Venus Genitrix for Csesar's Forum), Posis, plastes, 690, Coponius, brass-caster, 690, Menelaus, scholar of Stephanus, sculptor, about 690 (§, 416), Decius, brass-caster, about 695, Praxi teles [Pasiteles], Poseidonius, Leostratides, Zopyrus, toreutse and work ers in vessels, about 695, (SUver mirrors came into fashion through Praxiteles [Pasiteles], he made a figure of the young Roscius, Cic, de Div, i, 36), Aulanius Euandrus of Athens, toreutes and plastes, 710 — 724, Lysias, sculptor, about 724, Diooenes of Athens, sculptor, 727. Cephi- sodorus, at Athens, about 730 (?), C, I, 364. Bumnestus, Sosicratides' son, at Athens, about 730. C. I. 359. Add. Pytheas, Teucer, toreutse about that time. Majcenas' freedman Junius Thaletio, fiMurarius sigilla- rius, Gruter Thes. Inscr. 638, 6 (§, 306). Gold-workers of Livia, in the inscriptions of the Columbarium. [BubuUdes and Eucheir at Athens, alternately for three generations, C. I, n. 916. R, Rochette Suppl, au Ca tal. des Artistes, p. 306.] 3. Zopyrus' trial of Orestes before the Areopagus, is thought to be recognised on a cup found in the harbour of Antium, Winckelm. M. I. n. 151. Werke vii. tf 7. Subito ars base ita exolevit ut sola jam vetustate censeatur, PUn. xxxiu, 56. 4. Thus, for example, on the denarius of L. ManUus, with SuUa on the triumphal car, the reverse in particular is stiU very poorly handled. The denarius of A. Plautius is much better, with the Jew Bacchius, of the time of Pompey's Asiatic wars. That of Nerius with the head of Jupiter is very exceUent, of 703. EquaUy fine is that of Cornuficius with Jup. Amnon (I explain the reverse thus : Juno Sospita has sent a favourable omen to Cornuficius when taking the auspices, hence she car ries the crow on her shield, and now crowns him as conqueror). Like wise that of Sextus Pompeius with the head of his father, and on the reverse the brothers of Catana (comp. §. 157. Rem. 2), and Neptune as ruler of the sea, although, this one shows a certain dryness of style. 184 HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Per, V. That of Lentulus Cossus (after 729), with the refined countenance of Augustus and the honest face of Agrippa, is exceedingly beautiful. 1 197. In the time of the Cajsars the arts appear, from the general opinion, to have been degraded into handmaids of the luxury and caprice of princes. The effeminacy of the times, says Pliny, has annihilated the arts, and because there are no longer any souls to represent, the body also is neglected. 2 However, there were ingenious and excellent sculptors who filled the palaces of the Cesars with eminently beautiful 3 groups; and in Nero's time arose Zenodorus, at first in Gaul, and then at Rome, as a great brass-caster, who executed the commission to represent the emperor as Helius in a colossus 4 of 110 feet in height. However near he may have approached the earlier artists in dexterity of modelling and enchasing (for he also imitated the cups of Calamis so as to deceive), he could not, however, notwithstanding the greatest external ad vantages, again restore the more refined technical processes of metal casting, which were now lost. 1, Luxurise ministri, Seneca Epist. 88, — -Plin, xxxv, 2, 2. SimiUter Palatinas domos Csesarum replevere probatissimis signis Craterus cum Pythodoro, Polydectes cum Hermolao, Pythodorus alius cum Artemone; et singularis Aphrodisius TraUianus; PUn. xxxvi, 4, 11. [These are earUer artists whose works fiUed the palace.] There is no certain knowledge of any other sculptors of the time except a JuUus Chimserus who executed statues for Germanicus, according to an inscrip tion [Statuas et sediculam effecit, sedes marmoreas posuit, consecrated]; and Menodorus (under CaUgula ?) in Pausan. [A. Pantuleius of Ephesus made at Athens the statue of Hadrian, C, I. u, 339. M. Cossutius Kerdon worked for the viUa of Antoninus Pius at Lanuvium.] Nero himself turned his attention to toreutics and painting. Demetrius, a goldsmith at Ephesus, Acts of the Apostles. The names of artists in Virgil do not appear to refer to real persons. 3. The Colossus should have been a Nero, but was dedicated as Sol, 75. A. D. It had seven rays around the head, as Nero also has rays en circUng his in the bust in the Louvre (n. 334) and elsewhere. The co lossus stood in front of the Golden House on the site afterwards occupied by the temple of Venus and Roma, to make way for which it was taken to another place by Decrianus, with the assistance of 24 elephants, Spar tian Hadr, 19, comp, Eckhel D, N. vi. p. 336, It was afterwards trans formed into Commodus, Herod, i, 15. I 198. The most authentic sources of the history of art for that time are, 1st, The sculptures on public monuments, of which, however, there are none to be found till the time of the Flavii, the earlier works of this kind having perished. 2 The reliefs on the triumphal arch of Titus, representing the apotheosis of the emperor and the triumph over Judea, are TIME OP THE JULII AND FLAVII. 185 good in point of invention, and tasteful in the disposition, but carelessly worked out; and in those of the temple of Pallas in the forum of Domitian, the design in general is more de serving of praise than the execution, especially that of the draperies. 2. BartoU and Bellori, Admiranda Romse tb. 1 — 9. Arcus i. Comp. the coins with the Judaea capta, Pedrusi vi. tb. 12. H. Reland De spoliis tempU Hierosolymitani in arcu Titiano. Traject. 1716. 3. We here see PaUas instructing women in domestic tasks, Bartoli tb. 35^2 (63—70). Comp. the Ed. Winckelm. vi, ii. s. 334. 199. Secondly, The busts and statues of the emperors which go back, at least in the original, to the time of their reigns. They fall into different classes, which are also dis tinguished, and with greatest certainty, by their costume: 1, Such as reflect the individuality of the subjects without exal tation, and therefore also preserve the costume of life, — either the peaceful dress of the toga drawn over the head with re ference to priesthood, or the accoutrements of war, in which case the usual attitude is that of addressing armies (allo- cutio); in both kinds there are good statues of the time, [To this class likewise belong statues on horseback, or on tri umphal cars, which at first actually denoted marching at the head of an army, and triumphs or important conquests over the enemy, but were soon raised on all occasions from adula tion and vanity. 2. Such as were intended to exhibit the individual in an exalted, heroic, or deified character, to which belong the statues without drapery, and with a lance in the hand, which became usual from the time of Augustus, and which, according to Pliny, were called Achillean statues, as well as those in a sitting posture, with the upper part of the body naked, and a pallium around the loins, which commonly suggest the idea of Jupiter ; altogether, the practice of blending individuals with gods continued, and the art of elevating por traits into an ideal character was then still exercised with as much spirit as that of representing real characters in a simple and life-like manner. The statues also of women belonging to the reigning families fall into the two classes just laid down. On the other hand it is to be observed, that the solemn repre sentation of the Divus, the emperor consecrated by the senate, requires no ideal costume, but a sedent figure in the toga (which is often also drawn about the head), with the sceptre in the hand, and the crown of rays. Statues of cities and provinces were often now, as well as in the time of the Mace donians, combined with monuments of the princes, and this species of figures was generally treated by distinguished ar tists, as to which the coins also bear testimony- 186 HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Per. V. 2. Simulacrum aureum OaUgulse iconicum, Sueton, 22, Statuse civili habitu (OreUi Insor. n, 1139. 3186) or togat*, for example the Tiberius with beautiful toga, from Capri in the Louvre (111,) M, de BouiUon ii, 34. Augustus in priestly dress, from the basUica of Otriooli PioCl. ii, 46, Head of Augustus of basalt, found in 1780 at Canopus, Specim. of Anc, Sculpture ii, 46, Statue of Augustus in the Capitol, Race. 16, of Jul. Cse sar, ibid. Race. 16. Drusus from Herculaneum, Ant. di Ere, vi, 79. M. Borbon. vii, 43, [Seven excellent colossal statues excavated at Cervetri, now restored by de Fabris, in the Lateran, Germanicus, Drusus, Tiberius, CaUgula, Claudius, Agrippina and another female statue, together with the head of Augustus, BuU. 1840. p, 6, Canina Etr, Marit, I. 2. Mon. -oretto in Cere all' imper, Claudio dai dodici principaU popoli dell' Etruria, There were also exceUent colossal statues found in ancient Privernum, supposed to be from the Curia or the Augusteum of the city which Au gustus, Tiberius and Claudius reared anew ; the head of Claudius, Mus, Chiusamonti ii, tv. 32, In like manner colossal statues were raised by Veil to Augustus and Tiberius, Ibid, not, 3, Ibid, tv, 31. Comp. Canina Antich, di Veji, p, 83 sq. Colossal heads of Augustus and Tiberius were found in 1824 with the colossal statues of Tiberius and Germanicus. Clau dius from the BuspoU palace ; tv. 31, Titus with Julia found in 1828,] 3, Statuse pedestres habitu militari (Capitolin, Macrin. 6) or thofacatae, for example, the colossal Augustus in the palace Grimani, see Thiersch, Reisen i, s. 250 ff, [Tiberius Canina Tusculo, tv, 29, Pine bust of CaU gula found at Colchester Archseol. L, xxxi. pi, 15, p. 446; similar Caylus i, pi. 66, under the name of Claudius,] Drusus, son of Tiberius, in the Louvre, Mongez, Iconogr. Romaine pi. 23, 1, Titus in the Louvre 29. pi, 33, 1, 34, 1, 2, Bouill. ii, 41. Domitian and Marcus AureUus from the Giustiniani palace. Race, 89. 90. [Domitian M. Chiar. ii, tv. 36.] Domi tian from the Giustiniani palace, M. Chiar. ii. tv. 36. 4. The statua equestris of Augustus on the bridge over the Tiber (see Dio liii, 22, and the denarii of L. Vinicius) at least pointed at warUke plans. The colossal equestrian statue of Domitian in the Forum (Statius S. i, 1. Fr. Schmieder, Programm 1820), represented him as the con queror of Germany, with the Rhine under the horse's forefeet ; the left carried a PaUas holding out a Gorgoneion, the right commanded peace (comp. §. 335). Domitian with bust of Pallas on his shoulder, reUef in Vaillant de Canopo, p. 11 ; supposed statua equestris of Augustus, Race. 52. [Equestrian statue of Theodoric before the palace of Charlemagne at Aix-la-Chapelle, by Bock Jahrb. des Rhein. Alterth. Vereins v, s. 1,] Au gustus appears in quadrigis on a triumphal arch, attended by two Par- thians, after recovering the standards of Crassus, Eckhel. D, N. vi, p, 101, Statues in bigis were raised at first to magistrates on account of the pompa, in the circus, but chariots with four horses (even six-horse cars, which came in since the time of Augustus) without any regard to triumphs and pomps, and equestrian statues were erected even in the houses of advocates. Martial ix, 69. Tacit.de Orat, 8, 11. Juvenal vii, 126. Appulei. Flor. p. 136 Bipont. To the Emperors, on the other hand, were erected cars yoked with elephants, see PUn. xxxiv, 10, and the coins with the image of Divus Vespasianus, comp. Capitol., Maximin 26, 5, Statuse Achillece, PUn. xxxiv, 10, To this class appears to belong STATUES OF THE JULII AND FLAVII, 187 [the splendid Pompey in the Spada palace,] the colossal Agrippa (the dolphin is restored) in the palace Grimani, said to be from the Parthenon. Pococke Trav, ii. pi, 97. Visconti Icon, Roman, pL 8. Augustus in the Casa Bondanini, Winckelm. vu, s. 217, Claudius, Ant, di Ere, vi, 78. Domitian, Guattani M. I. 1786, p, xvi. Comp. the examples in Levezow's Antinous, s. 61. There is often a paUium around the body, as in the otherwise AchiUean Germanicus from the basiUca of Gabii in the Louvre 141. Mongez, pi. 24, 3. and the Nero, Louvre 32. Clarac, pi. 322. 6. Herod erected in Csesarea colossal statues of Augustus-Jupiter and Roma. Joseph. B. I. i, 21. comp. §. 203. The sedent colossal statues of Augustus and Claudius from Herculanum in regard to dress have the costume of Jupiter, M. Borbon. iv. 36. 37. An Augustus of bronze as a standing Jupiter with the thunderbolt. Ant. di Ere. vi, 77, The fine bust of Augustus at Munich 227, and in the Louvre 278, Mongez, pi. 18, has indeed the crown of oak-leaves, but otherwise it is quite a portrait. The sitting statue of Tiberius from Piperno has the costume of Jupiter, and his horrible countenance is rendered as noble as possible. Mongez, pi. 22. Comp. the Veientine statue, Guattani Mem. Encicl, 1819. p, 74, and the splendid head from Gabii, BouiU. ii, 75. CaUgula even wished to convert the Zeus at Olympia into a statue of himself. The magnifi cent colossal bust in Spain represents Claudius as a god, Admir. Romse, 80, Mongez, pi. 27, 3, 4, but even deified he retains a doltish look. A grandly treated colossal head of VitelUus at Vienna. — Augustus as ApoUo, §, 362, 2, 7. Portrait statues: Livia as priestess of Augustus from Pompeii, M. Borbon, iu, 37, AveUino, Atti d. Acad, Ercol. ii, p, 1. The first Agrippina in the capitol, splendid in the disposition of the entire figure, less deserving of praise in the drapery, M, Cap, T, ui. t. 53, Mongez, pi. 24,'* 1, 2. SimUar in Florence, Wicar iii, 4. Farnesian statue of the second (?) Agrippina grandly handled, Mongez, pi, 27, 6, 7, M, Borbon, iii, 22, — Livia as Ceres (L, 622, Bouill, ii, 54. comp. R. Rochette, Ann. d. Inst. i. p. 149. on this costume). Magna Mater (§. 200), Vesta (on coins Bckhpl vi. p. 156). JuUa, daughter of Augustus, as Cora, L. 77. BouiU. ii, 8&. Agrippina, DrusiUa, and JuUa, Caligula's sisters, on coins as Secu- ritas, Pietas, and Portuna, Eckhel vi. p. 219. — [Two of JuUa, daughter of Titus M. Chiaram. u, 34. 35.]— Among the most excellent of the portrait statues are the matron and virgin (the latter also found in a copy) from Herculanum at Dresden, n. 272 — 274. Bekker August. 19 — 24. comp. Race. 91, reckoned by Hirt to be Caligula's mother and two sisters. Fa mily of Marcus Nonius Balbus from Herculanum, two equestrian statues (§. 434) from the basUica, and seven statues on foot from the theatre, viz. Balbus with his father, mother, and four daughters. Neapel's Ant. s. 17 ff. 8. Thus, for example, Divus Julius on the Cameo, §, 200, 2. b., Divus Augustus on coins of Tiberius, ifec, Nero was the first who assumed while Uving (as Phoebus) the corona radiata, Eckhel vi. p. 269, Mongez, pi, 30, 3. 4. BouUl. ii, 7^. §. 197, 3. Comp, Schopflin, De Apotheosi, 1730, 7 9, Coponius executed fourteen nations conquered by Pompey, for the portico ad nationes in Pompey's theatre ; Augustus seems to have added another series, Schneider ad Varr. de R, R, ii, p. 221, Thiersch Epochen, 188 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per, V. s. 296. These were certainly statues : on the other hand eight figures of cities in reUef stiU existing at Rome and Naples (Visconti M. PioCl. iu. p. 61. M. Borbon. iii, 57. 58), are better assigned to the attic of the por tico of Agrippa. On the great altar of Augustus at Lugdunum (known from coins) there were figures of 60 GaUic tribes. Strab. iv. p. 192.— The pedestal of the statue of Tiberius, which the urbes restitutss caused to be erected to Augustus, is stiU preserved at PuteoU with the figures of 14 cities of Asia Minor, which are executed in a very characteristic man ner. See L. Th. Gronov, Thes. Ant. Gr. vu. p. 432. BeUey, Mem. de I'Ac. des Inscr. xxiv. p. 128. Eckhel D. N. vi. p, 193, Comp, §, 405, I 200. Equally important materials for the history of art are furnished by gems, Dioscorides, who engraved the head of Augustus with which the emperor himself sealed, was the 2 most distinguished worker of the time in intaglios. But still more important than the stones preserved under his name, is a series of cameos which represent the Julian and Claudian families at particular epochs, and besides the splendour of the material and dexterity in using it, are also in many other re- 3 spects deserving of admiration. In all the principal works of the kind the same system prevails of representing those princes as divine beings presiding over the world with benig nant sway, as present manifestations of the most exalted deities, 4 The design is careful and full of expression, although there is no longer to be found in them the spirit in handling and no bleness of forms which distinguish the gems of the Ptolemies (§, 161) ; on the contrary, there is here as well as in the reliefs of triumphal arches and many statues of the emperors, a pe culiarly Roman form of body introduced, which is distin guished considerably from the Grecian by a certain heaviness. 1. Seven gems of Dioscorides have been hitherto considered genuine, two with the head of Augustus, a so-called Msecenas, a Demosthenes, two Mercuries, and a palladium-theft (Stosch, Pierres Grav. pi. 25 sqq. Bracci, Mem, degli Incis, tb, 57, 58, Winckelm, W. vi, tf. 8, b,) : but even as to these more accurate investigations are still to be looked for, Augustus Impr. gemm. iv, 93. [Onyx-cameo, Augustus in the green vault at Dresden.] Dioscorides' sons, Brophilus (Bd, Winck, vi, 2, s, 301), Butyches (R, Rochette, Lettre h Mr. Schorn, p. 42). Contemporaries, Agathangelus (head of Sextus Pompeius 1), Saturninus, and Pergamus, a worker in gems, of Asia Minor, R. Rochette, p. 51. 47. comp. p. 48. Solon, Gnseus, Aulus and Admon are also assigned to this period. jElius, under Tiberius, Buodus, under Titus (JuUa, daughter of Titus, on a beryl at Florence. Lippert. i, ii, 349). 2. Cameos. The three largest : a. That of Vienna, the Gemma Au- gustea, of the most careful workmanship, 9X8 inches in size. Eckhel, Pierres Grav. pi. 1. [Clarac pi. 1053.] Kohler iiber zwei Gemmen der KK, Sammlung zu Wien, Tf 2, [Comp. Morgensterns Denkschr. on Kohler, s. 16 sq.] MiUin G. M. 179, 677. Mongez, pi. If),* Arneth, Beitrage zur Gesch. von Oesterreich ii. s. 1 18. Representation of the Augustan family ENGRAVED STONES AND COINS. 189 in the year 12. Augustus (beside him his horoscope, comp. Eckhel D. N. vi. p. 109), with the Utuus as a symbol of the auspices, sits enthroned as Jupiter Victorious together with Roma; Terra, Oceanus, Abundantia surround the throne, and are in the act of crowning him. Tiberius triumphing over the Pannonians, descends from the car, which is guided by a Victory, in order to prostrate himself before Augustus, Germani cus at the same time receives honores triumphales. Below, a tropseon is erected by Roman legionaries and auxiUaries (here the scorpion on a shield perhaps refers to the horoscope of Tiberius), Sueton. Tib, 20. Passow has last contributed to the explanation in Zimmermann's Zeit schrift fiir Alterthumsw. 1834, N, 1, 2, [after Thiersch Epochen s, 306.] b. The Parisian Cameo, by Baldwin the II. from Byzantium to St. Louis ; de la Ste Chapelle (there called Joseph's dream), now in the Cabinet du Roi. Le Roy, Achates Tiberianus. 1683, MiUin G. M, 181, 676, Mongez, pi, 26. [Clarac, pi, 1052,] The largest of aU, 13 X 11 in, ; a sardonyx of five layers [which is usually thought to be a work of the Augustan age, but is by some assigned to the third century]. The Au gustan famUy some time after the death of Augustus, Above: Augustus in heaven welcomed by .^neas, Divus Julius and Drusus. In the middle: Tiberius as Jupiter jBgiochus beside Livia-Ceres, under whose auspices Germanicus goes to the East in the year 17. Around them, the elder Agrippina, Caligula (comitatus patrem et in Syriaca expeditione. Suet. Calig. 10. comp. M. Borbon. v, 36), Drusus II, a prince of the Arsacidse (?), CUo, and Polymnia. Below : The nations of Germany and the Bast con quered. Explained in the same way by Eckhel, Visconti, Mongez, Icono- graphie and Mem. de I'Inst. Roy. viu. p. 370 (Sacerdoce de la famille de Tibfere pour le culte d'Auguste), particularly by Thiersch Epochen, s. 305. On the contrary, Hirt, Analekten i, u. s. 322, explains it as. Nero's adop tion into the JuUan famUy, at the same time with which there happened to be an arrival of captives from the Bosporus. Fleck Wissensch. Reise durch das siidUche Deutschland, ItaUen u. s. w. i, 1. s. 172. [The apo theosis of Augustus in a reUef in the Sacristy of San VitaU at Ravenna, with Roma, Claudius, Jul. Csesar, Livia as Juno, Augustus as Jupiter.] c. That of the Netherlands (de Jonge, Notice sur le Cab. des Me- daiUes du Roi des Pays-Bas, i Suppl. 1824, p. 14), [Clarac, pi. 1064, Clau dius and his famUy, Germanicus and Agrippina, pi. 1065 — 1057.] a sar donyx of three layers, 10 inches high, exceUent in design, but much in ferior in execution to the others, Millin G, M. 177, 678. Mongez, pi. 29. Claudius as Jupiter triumphant (after the Britannic victory), MessaUna, Octavia and Britannicus in a chariot drawn by Centaurs as trophy- bearers : Victory flying on before. The representation of Germanicus and Agrippina traveUing over the world as Triptolemus and Demeter Thesmophorus (with the scroU), on a fine cameo at Paris, is designed in the same spirit of ingenious adulation. Mem. de I'Ac. des Inscr. i. p. 276. MiUin G. M. 48, 220. Mongez, pi. 24'*, 3. — A silver goblet in the KK. Antiken-Cabinet, which was found at Aquileia, exhibits a similar composition exceUently designed. On the upper field, between Jupiter and Ceres, Proserpina and Hecate, Germani cus, as it seems, is represented, in reUef (the drapery gilded) about to sacrifice at an altar to these deities, in order afterwards to mount the 190 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. V. dragon-chariot as a new Triptolemus; the Earth-goddess lies beneath. [Publ, by the author, Mon. d. I. iu. tv. 4. Ann. xi. p. 78.] Other works of this time, which was very fertile in fine cameos, in Mon gez, pi, 24* 5. 29, 3, and Eckhel, pi, 2, 5. 7 — 12. Augustus and Livia, Impr, deU' Inst, ii, 79. Livia as Magna Mater holding a bust of Divus Augustus, Kohler ibid. A head of Agrippa of exceeding beauty on a Niccolo at Vienna, [The Carpegna stone, now in the Vatican, in Buona rotti MadagUoni, p, 427, together with another,] 4, It is found almost universaUy that the body is long in proportion to the legs ; it is remarked by Rumohr that this is a national pecuUarity of the Roman form, Ital. Forschungen i. s. 78. I 201. In the coins, especially the bronze medals struck by the senate, of the emperors of the Julian and Flavian families, art appears to have remained stationary at the same height; 2 the heads are always full of life, characteristic and nobly con ceived, the reverses more rarely, but yet also sometimes of per- 3 feet execution, especially on bronzes of Nero. The mythico- allegorical compositions of these coins, which were intended to represent the situation of the empire and the imperial house (§, 406), are full of spirit and ingenious invention, al though the figures are handled in a traditional and hasty manner, 1, The transcripts in Mediobarbus and Strada are not to be depended on any more than the Ul-reputed ones of Golzius, neither are, according to Bckhel's account, even the beautiful representations in Gori's M, Flo rentinum. Those in the works on the coins of the emperors by Patinus, Pedrusi, Banduri (from Decius downwards) and MoreUi are more trust worthy. Bossifere, M6daiUons du Cab, du Roi. Lenormant Tresor de Glyptique, I 202. In the time of Trajan were executed the reliefs which 2 represent his victory over the Dacians. Powerful forms in natural and appropriate attitudes, character and expression in the countenances, ingenious motives to relieve the monoto ny of military order, feeling and depth in the representation of pathetic scenes, such as that of the women and children praying for mercy, give to these works a high value, notwith standing many faults in the handling both of the nude and 3 the_ draperies. — The statues of the emperors, as well as the copies of them on coins and cameos, were during this time scarcely inferior to those of the immediately preceding period; 4 it would, however, be rash to conclude from the excellence of these that as much was achieved in other subjects. 2. See the Bd. of WinckeUn. vi, 2. s, 345, As to the historical events, see, besides BeUori, Heyne de Col, Traj. in Engel's Commentatio de Ex peditione Trajani. To these belong also the sculptures on the arch of SCULPTURES OF TRAJAN'S AND HADRIAN'S TIME. 191 Constantine, where, besides Trajan, Hadrian also with Antinous appears. Admir. Romse, tb. 10 — 27 ; the tropsea of the Parthian campaign from the castellum aquoe Marcice, now in the Capitol ; and other reliefs with warriors from a monument of Trajan, which Winckelm. describes vi, i. s. 283. Kindred representations on coins, for example rex Parlhorum vic- tus, Pedrusi vi, 26, 7. rex Parthis datus, regna assignaia. [The exceUent alto relievo of Trajan from the Aldobrandini palace, in the sale Borgia of the Vatican is supposed to be from the forum of Trajan, as weU as many other monuments of that house, perhaps also the highly animated wrest lers (called Dares and Entellus) which are now also there. M. Chiaram. u, 21. 22 ; where there are also tv, 49 — 51 splendid pieces of frieze from the BasiUca and the BibUotheca Ulpia,] 3. Fine colossal statue of Nerva in the Vatican, PioCl. iii, 6. Mon gez, pi, 36, 1. 2. A fine statua thoracata of Trajan in the Louvre 42 (Cla rac, pi. 337), colossal head 14, Mongez, pi, 36, 3, 4, Large bronze bust of Hadrian in the Mus, of the Capitol, Mongez, pi. 38. On others, Winckelm. vi, i, s. 306. Statue Race. 104, Statues of Hadrian were raised by all the Greek cities. C, I, 321 sqq. On the nimii cenei maximi m/oduli, which began with Hadrian, the head of that emperor is very in geniously and successfuUy handled ; the reverses too are fine. Hadrian in warlike costume on cameos, Eckhel, Pierres Grav. pi. 8. Apotheosis, Mongez, pi, 38, 7. Sabina, Race. 107. Impr. gemm, iv, 99. 4. Dio Chrysost. Or, 21, p, 273, declares the statues of the athletes at Olympia to be the later the worse, and the x«i/u ivxXxiovg ^rxilxg to be the best. 203. Through Hadrian's love of art, although in agreat measure, affected, it was now enabled to take a higher flight, whereas it had hitherto gradually become merely the repre sentor of external reality. The countries which were then flourishing anew, Greece and more especially anterior Asia Minor, produced artists who understood how to reanimate art in such a way as to gratify the wishes and inclinations of the emperor. This is particularly seen in the statues of Antinous which were executed at this period and in these countries. The most surprising thing is the certainty with which this character is, on the one hand, modified by the artists in dif ferent gradations, as man, hero, and god, but on the other, is nevertheless adhered to and carried out in its peculiar essence. Besides, Hadrian's time was also that in which the Egyptian style was most exercised, sometimes in more severe sometimes in milder form, as is shown by the statues from the Villa Tiburtina and a peculiar class of the representations of Anti nous, They are chiefly of black stone, so-called basalt, for at this time the taste for the splendour of coloured stones had even invaded the plastic art to a great extent (comp. §. 309). 1. Hadrian was himself a Polyclitus or Euphranor according to Vic tor. Artists of the time : Papias and Aristeas of Aphrodisias, who give their names as authors of two centaurs of marmo bigio from the Tibur- 192 HISTORY OF GREEK ART. [Per. V. tine viUa (M. Cap. iv, 32) ; one of them resembles the famous Borghese centaur (§. 389), Winck. vi, 1. s. 300. A Zeno also in several inscriptions, Gruter, p. 1021, 1. Winckelm, vi, 1. s. 278. 2. s. 341. R. Rochette, Let tre k M. Schorn, p. 91, and the AttiUanus (Atticion?) on the statue of a muse at Florence, both also from that place, led Winckelmann to the as sumption of an Aphrodisian school. An Bphesian dvl^ixvro'jroiog A. Pan tuleius, C. I. 339. Xenophantes of Thasos, 336. 3. Antinous, who was from Claudiopolis in Bithynia, in pcedagogiis Ccesaris, was drowned in the Nile near Besa (§. 191.), or feU the victim of a gloomy superstition (an extremely enigmatical story) about the year 130 A. D. The Greeks apotheosised him to please Hadrian, Spart. 14 ; his worship in Bithynia and Mantinea (because the Bithynians were my thically derived from Mantinea, Paus. viii, 9). Numerous statues and representations on reliefs and coins. See Levezow iiber den Antinous. B. 1808. Petit-Radel, M. Napol. ui. p. 91—113. Mongez T. iu. p. 52. An tinous as Ganymede, Spec, of Anc. Sculpt, ii, 52. ? Eckhel D. N. vi. p. 528. Recognised by his fine head of hair, his eye-brows, his full mouth, which has something sombre about it, his broad high-arched chest, and so forth. — Worshipped at Mantinea as another Dionysus (also on coins as Diony sus, lacchus, and Pan with aU sorts of Bacchic insignia). Of this de scription are the colossal statue from Palsestrina in the Braschi palace [now in the Lateran], Levezow Tf 7. 8. (that at Dresden 401. August. 18. similar) [a good statue of Antinous-Bacchus also in ViUa CasaU.] ; the magnificent bust in ViUa Mondragone, now in the Louvre, formerly co loured slightly [of marble of a Ught-reddish colour], the eyes of precious stones, grapes and pine-cones of metal, the character earnestly and stern ly conceived, BouiU. ii, 82." Levezow 10 (a repetition at BerUn 141) ; the Cameo with the head of Antinous, to which a Silenus-mask serves as a covering, Eckhel, Pierres Grav. 9. As Agathodsemon (the cornucopia formed from an elephant's trunk) at Berlin 140. Bouill. u, 61. M. Roy. ii, 1. As Hermes on Alexandrine coins, head with wings at Berlin 142. As Hercules in the Louvre 234. Clarac. pi. 267. Bouill. ii, 50. As Aristseus in the Louvre 258. Bouill. ii, 48. As a new Pythius on coins. An An- tinous-ApoUo of marble found at Lycopolis, in the Drovetti coUection. — The Capitoline Antinous in heroic form (with short-curled hair and powerful frame), M. Cap, iii. 56. BouiU, ii, 49, Levezow, 3. 4, Similar at Berlin 134, ' Avnvoog ii^ug dyxiiog on coins. But even as a hero he is sometimes also represented as Bacchian, sitting upon the panther, as on coins of Ties. — More individual, among^ others in the bust, N. 49 in the Louvre, Mongez, pi, 39, 3, PioCl, vi, 47, "Race, 12r,< Beautiful bust on Bithynian coins, Mionnet, Suppl. v. pi. 1, 1. — The celebrated group of Ildefonso is referred by Visconti (su due Musaici, p. 31), Mongez (T. iii. p. 55. pi. 39), and others to Antinous on account of the resemblance of the head of one of the figures, (which is however held by others to be foreign to the figure) ; the other youth would then, most probably, be the life-genius of Hadrian. Hypnos and Thanatos, according to Lessing, Ger hard Venere Pros. p. 49, R. Rochette M, I. p. 176, 218. Welcker Akad. Kunstmuseum S. 63, 6, On the Egyptian Antinous, Winckelm, vi, 1, s. 299 f 2, 357. vii 36. BouiU. u. 47 Le^ez. 11. 12. Comp. besides §. 408. THE ANTONINES. 193 204. During the long reign of the Antonines the Roman I world reposed from its exhaustion without being able to re cover its ancient energies. As Asiatic bombast on the one hand, and dull insipidity on the other, prevailed more and more in the oratorical, so also both tendencies seem to have been manifested in the plastic arts. Nay, even in the busts 2 of the emperors, which are often very carefully executed, both may in some measure be seen at the same time, inasmuch as the hair of the head and beard luxuriates in an exaggerated profusion of curls, and a studied elegance is found in all the other accessories, whilst the features of the countenance are conceived and rendered with the most signal triviality. The 3 coins also degenerated in art, although those struck at Rome were still much better, especially in the conception of the im perial physiognomy, than the bronze medals which were then struck in great numbers in the cities of Asia Minor and Thrace, on which these cities, with the vanity of sophistic rhetoricians, exhibited their images of gods, their temples, their local mythi, and works of art, without however them selves producing any thing worthy of notice. In the same 4 way must be limited the praise of artistic perfection in other productions of this period. Pausanias considered the masters 5 who then lived scarce worth mentioning. 2. See especially the two colossal busts of Marcus Aurelius and Lu cius Verus in the Louvre, 138, 140 (Villa Borgh. St. 5, 20. 21. BouiU. u, 8^J, from Acqua Traversa, near Rome, the latter of which in particular (also in Mongez, pi. 43, 1. 2) is a master-piece of its kind. Pine Farne sian statue of L. Verus in the M. Borbon. x, 27, Race. 106. Silver sta tues were raised to M. Aurel. and Faustina in the temple of Venus, and a golden one of her was brought to the theatre when she appeared, Dio Cass, Ixxi, 31, On the busts of Socrates, M, Aurelius and others found at Marathon (Herodes Atticus), see Dubois, Catal, d'Antiq, de Choiseul- Gouff. p, 21. The M, AureUus in the Louvre 26 (Clarac, pi. 314) is a work of little value notwithstanding the careful execution of the corslet, — The hair on those busts is very laboriously worked out, and perforated with the auger. The eyelids Ue close in a leathery manner, the mouth is compressed, the wrinkles about the eyes and mouth strongly marked. The marking of the eyeballs and eyebrows is also to be found in busts of Antinous,— [The bust said to be that of Herodes Atticus from a tomb at Marathon in the Cab, PourtalSs, pi, 37,] — In the busts of women of rank (such as Plotina, Marciana and Matidia even in Trajan's time) the sculptors took the greatest pains to represent faithfully the absurd head dress, A puffiness in the treatment of the folds is observable in the draperies, 3, Many of the large bronze coins of Antoninus Pius are almost equal to the best of Hadrian, although the countenance is always handled in a less spirited manner ; especiaUy those which contain on the reverse re presentations from the early times of Rome, and the PaUantion which was then revived in Arcadia (on which see Eckhel vii,^, 29 sq,). The one N 194 HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Per, V. with the inscription around the bust of Antoninus, Antoninus Aug, Pius P. P, Tr, P, Cos. iii,, is particularly fine ; on the reverse Hercules dis covering his son Telephus suckled by the hind. The coins of Marcus AureUus are universally inferior. On the city coins see below : locality §. 255. — Race. 105, [The circular pedestal with Antonine who was from Lanuvium, his two sons, Juno Lanuvina, Victoria, Roma, Mars, Venus, in ViUa Pamfili was brought thither from the neighbourhood, where An tonine had estates.] 4. The equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius in the square of the Capitol (formerly before S. Giovanni in the Lateran), of gUded brass, is a respectable work, but both horse and man stand at an immense distance from a Lysippian production. Perrier, tb. 11. Sandrart ii, 1. Falconet Sur la Statue de M. Aurfele, Amst, 1781, Race, 14, Cicognara Stor, della Scultura iii, tv, 23, Mongez, pi, 41, 6, 7, Antique pedestal of the equestrian statue, BuU, 1834. p. 112. Deification of Antoninus and the elder Faustina on the base of the granite column, §. 191, a fine relief; the decursio funebris on the sides shows a great inferiority. PioOl. v, 28 — 30. [The entire pedestal is now restored, de Fabris il Piedestallo d. col. Antonina coUocato nel giardino della pigna, R. 1846. 4to.] The reUefs also on the attic of Constantino's arch bear reference to Antonine. The column of Marcus Aurelius is interesting on account of the scenes from the war with the Marcomanni (with the representation of the tem pest, Bellori, tb. 16, comp. Kastner's Agape, s. 463 — 490) ; the workman ship is much poorer than on Trajan's column. Apotheosis of the younger Faustina from the arch of Marcus Aurelius, M. Cap. iv, 12. 5. The expression of Pausanias : dyx7^pc,a.rx rexvng riig i0' iifiav vi, 21. cannot possibly be one of praise. He praises the statue of gold and ivory in the Athenian Olympieion " if we look to the impression of the great whole," i, 18, 6. As to artists he only mentions altogether after the 120th Olympiad two or three certain names. Did Crito and Nicolaus, who made the Caryatides [in Villa Albani, according to Winckelmann, of the time of Cicero] found in the Via Appia near Rome, belong to this period? Guattani M. I. 1788. p. Ixx. A skilful wood-carver, Saturninus at Oila in Africa, Appulei de magia, p. 66. Bip. On works of art to which Herod gave occasion, Winckelm. vi, 1. s. 319. I 205, The more unsettled times of Commodus, his immediate successors, Septimius Severus and his family, adhered in art to the style which had been formed in the time of the Antonines, with still more distinct symptoms however of de- 2 clension. The best works of the period are the busts of the emperors which the slavish disposition of the senate greatly promoted ; yet the most carefully wrought are precisely those in which turgidity and manner are most apparent in the 3 treatment. Perukes, and drapery of coloured stones corre- 4 spend to the taste in which the whole is treated. To these busts are closely allied those on bronze medals and cameos; here also the blending of individual with ideal forms still con tinued to produce many interesting works, although it ceased 5 to be so intimate a combination as in earlier times. In the COMMODUS, SEPTIMIUS, OARACALLA, 195 time of CaracaUa there were sculptured many statues — espe cially of Alexander the Macedonian ; Alexander Severus also was particularly favourable to statues, in so far as he could regard them as memorials of eminent men. The reliefs on 6 the triumphal arches of Septimius, especially the smaller one, are executed in a mechanical style. 2, Commodus sometimes appears young (Uke a gladiator), sometimes iu riper years. On bronze medals we see his bust in youthful form, with athletic body, the crown of laurel and the segis, A fine head in the ca pitol. Good bust of Pertinax in the Vatican from VeUetri, CardinaU Mem. Romane iii. p. 83. Engraved stones, Lippert i, ii, 415. Crispina, Maffei 108. Septimius Severus next to L. Verus most frequently in busts. PioCl. vi, 53 (with Gorgoneion on the breast) ; from Gabii, in the Louvre 99. Mon. Gab. n. 37. Mongez, pi. 47, 1. 2. The workmanship, however, is stUl drier than in the Antonines. Bronze statue of Severus, [in the Barbarini palace, now in the Sciarra] Maffei Race. 92, very care- fuUy executed, especiaUy in the accessories. ExceUent busts of CaracaUa with an affected expression of rage, at Naples (M. Borbon, iii, 25), in the PioCl. (vi, 55), the Capitol and Louvre (68. Mongez, pi, 49, 1), See the Ed, of Winck. vi. s. 383. Comp. the Gem, Lippert i, ii, 430, which is executed with care, but in a spiritless manner. Youthful equestrian sta tue in the Farnese palace at Rome, Race, 54, Some busts of Heliogaba lus are valued on account of fine workmanship, at Munich 216, in the Louvre 83. Mongez, pi. 61, 1, 2 ; PioCl. vi, 66. The short-cropped hair and shaved beard again came in with Alexander Severus. — Of artists we know Atticus in the time of Commodus, C. I. p. 399, and Xenas by a bust of Clodius Albinus in the Capitol. 3. In the empresses the mode of wearing the hair became more and more absurd; in Julia Domna, Sosemias, Mammsea and PlautiUa (the wife of CaracaUa) it was evidently perukes, gcderi, galericula, sictilia, textilia capiUamenta. A head of LucUla with hair of black marble that could be taken off, Winck. v. s, 51, comp, on similar cases the Ed, s, 360. after Visconti and Bottiger. Fr. Nicolai On the use of false hair and perukes, s. 36, JuUa Mammsea in the Capitol, Race, 18. 4. Commodus, according to Lamprid. 9, received statues in the cos tume of Hercules ; some of the kind are stiU extant. Epigram on this subject in Dio Cass, in Mai's Nova CoU. u. p. 225. Head of Hercules- Commodus on gems, Lippert i, ii, 410. A beautiful medal exhibits on the one side the bust of Hercules-Commodus, and on the other how he as Hercules founded Rome anew (as a colony of Commodus), according to the Etruscan rite ; Here. Rom. Conditori P. M. Tr. P. xviii, Cos. vii, P, P, Eckhel vii. p, 131, comp, p, 122, According to later chronographers Com modus placed his head on the colossus of Rhodes, which had been re- erected by Vespasian or Hadrian; AUatius ad Philon. p. 107. OrelU, Septimius Severus with his two sons (?) as Jupiter, Hercules and Bac chus, at Luna (Fanti scritti di Carrara), Gius. A, Guattani in the Dissert, deU' Ace, Rom. di Arch. T, i, p, 321, GaUienus also loved to be repre sented as Sol, and appeared at processions radiatus. TrebeU. 16, 18, It wa's very common at this time to represent the empresses as Venus 196 HISTORY OP GREEK ART, [Per, V, with scanty drapery. The insipid character of the portrait, often also the mode of dressing the hair, then usually form a striking contrast with the representation. Thus Marciana, Trajan's sister, St. di S. Marco u, 20. Winckelm. vi. 284, comp. v, 275 ; JuUa Sosemias (with moveable hair), PioClement. ii, 51 ; SaUustia, the wife of Severus Alexander, Ve- nerifelici sacrum, PioCl. ii, 52. The representation of the two Paustinae as Ceres and Proserpine was nobler, R. Rochette Ann. d. Inst. i. p. 147. 5. CaracaUa's aping of Alexander caUed forth everywhere statues of the Macedonian, also Janus figures of CaracaUa and Alexander, Herodian iv, 8. Of this time was the tumulus of Pestus near lUon (yet it might also be the tomb of Musonius under Valens, see Eunapius in Mai Vet. Ser. nova coU. T. i. p. 171.), Choiseul Gouff. Voy, Pitt, T, ii, pi. 30. On Severus Alexander, who collected artists from all quarters and erected numerous statues, Lamprid, 25. 6. Victories of Septimius Severus over the Parthians, Arabians, and Adiabenians. Arcus Sept, Sev, anaglypha cum explic, Suaresii, R, 1676. fo. On the arch of the Argentarii figures of the emperor, Julia Domna, Geta (destroyed) and CaracaUa, engaged in sacrifice. 1 206. However, even the century of the Antonines and their successors was not without a productiveness of its own, which added new links to the series of developments furnished 2 by the ancient world of art. The reliefs on sarcophagi, which did not come into general use until this period, through the influence of un-Grecian ideas, treated subjects derived from the cycles of Demeter and Dionysus, and also from heroic mythology, so as that the hope of a second birth and eman cipation of the soul should be thereby expressed in a variety 3 of ways. The fable of Eros and Psyche also was often employ ed for that purpose, being one which unquestionably repre sents the pangs of the soul when separated from the heavenly Eros: judging likewise from the literary notices of the mythus, the ingeniously composed but indifferently executed groups of Eros and Psyche will scarcely be assigned to an earlier age 4 than that of Hadrian. At the same time art endeavoured more and more to embody the ideas which the invasion of oriental culture introduced; and after it had in the second century produced many works of distinguished merit in Egyp tian figures of the gods modified by the Grecian spirit, it now applied itself, already become more rude and incapable, to the worship of Mithras, of the images belonging to which there is nothing of any excellence remaining except perhaps two sta- 5 tues of Mithraic torch-bearers (§. 408, 7). In the representa tion of the tri-form Hecate (§ 397, 4) and in the numerous Panthea signa (§. 408, 8) there is manifested a want of satis faction with the established forms of the ancient Hellenic images of the gods, a longing for more comprehensive and universal expressions, which must necessarily have strayed into 6 abnormal shapes. The eclectic superstition of the time em- NEW SUBJECTS AND DECLINE OF ART. 197 ployed gems as magic amulets against diseases and dtemonic influences (§. 433), placed favourable and benign constellations on signet-rings and coins (§. 400, 3), and by blending to gether Egyptian, Syrian and Grecian creeds, especially at Alexandria, gave birth to the pantheistic figure of lao- Abraxas with all the various kindred forms of the so-called Abraxas gems (§. 408, 8). 2. On the introduction of sarcophagi, Visconti PioCl. iv. p. ix. On the tendency of the mythi represented, Gerhard Beschr. Roms s. 320 f below §. 368, 1. 397, 2. Ans. Feuerbach der Vatic. Apollo s. 317. "A whole cornucopia of poetic flowers was on Roman sarcophagi poured out on the resting-place of the dead, a truly inexhaustible riches of delicate allusions. The many coloured series of mythical forms which here gain a new and deeper significance from the very place which they served to adorn, might be compared to stories with which an ingenious author be guiles the hours of sadness." The reference to the buried person is per fectly evident when, for example, the head of a Bacchian Bros, who is carried away drunk from the banquet (the banquet of Ufe, of which he has enjoyed enough), is left unexecuted, because it was to receive (either by sculpture or painting) the features of him who was laid in the sarco phagus. M. PioCl. V, 13. Gerhard in the Beschr. Roms u, 2. s. 146. — Grecian steles in later style, Annali d. Inst. i. p. 143. 3. A coin of Nicomedia struck about 236, in Mionnet Suppl. v. pi. 1, 3, shows Psyche prostrate and beseeching Amor. See besides §. 391, 8. However, Erotes and Psychse wreathing fiowers are to be seen on a pic ture from Pompeii. M. Borbon. iv, 47. Gerhard Ant. BUdw. iv, 62, 2. 207. The turgidity and luxuriance of art gradually passed 1 over into tameness and poverty. On coins, which are our 2 most certain guides, the heads are contracted in order that more of the figure and the accessories may be introduced; but at the end of the third century the busts lose all relief, 3 the design becomes inaccurate and school-boy like, the whole representation flat, characterless, and so destitute of indivi duality, that even the different persons are only distinguish able by the legends, and that utterly lifeless style makes its appearance, in which the Byzantine coins are executed. The 4 elements of art were lost in a remarkably rapid manner; such of the reliefs on the arch of Constantine as were not stolen are rude and clumsy ; those on the Theodosian column, as well as on the pedestal of the obelisk which Theodosius erected in the hippodrome at Byzantium, are hardly less so. In sarcophagi, 5 after the turgid works of the later Roman period, which were crowded with figures in alto rilievo mostly in animated action, we find in Christian monuments a monotonous arrangement often influenced by architectonic conditions, and the driest and poorest workmanship. The Christian world from the out- 6 198 ~ HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Per. V. set made far less use of the plastic art than_ of painting ; how ever, the erection of honorary statues survived art for a very- long time in the different parts of the Roman empire, espe cially at Byzantium ; nay, the distinction was eagerly coveted, although indeed more regard was had to the due designation of rank by situation and drapery than to the representation of character and individuality; as all life at that period must have been completely smothered under the mass of empty forms. Ornamental vessels of precious metal and sculptured stones — a luxury in which the highest point was attained in the later times of the Romans, still continued to be executed with a certain dexterity; there was also much labour ex pended on ivory writing-tablets or diptycha — a kind of works peculiar to Rome in its decline (§. 312, 3); and thus in vari ous ways did technical and mechanical skill endure beyond the life of art itself 2, Thus in the case of Gordianus Pius, GaUienus, Probus, Cams, Numerianus, Carinus, Maximianus, This striving to give more of the figure is shown also in the busts. Thus the Gordianus Pius from Gabii in the Louvre 2,, in Mongez, pi, 54, 1. 2. 3, The coins of Constantine exemplify the style here described ; the Byzantine manner begins with the successors of Theodosius (Du Cange, Banduri), — The decline of art is also shown in the coins of consecration (under GaUienus), as well as in the contorniati distributed at pubUc games. — Statues of the time : Constantine in the Lateran, notwithstand ing the' clumsy forms of the limbs, is praised on account of its natural attitude. Winck. vi, 1. s. 339. 2. s. 394. Mongez, pi. 61, 1. 2. Constan- tinus II. (?) on the Capitol, Mongez, pi. 62,' 1 — 3. JuUan in the Louvre 301. Mongez, pi, 63, 1 — 3, a very lifeless figure. Comp. Seroux d' Agin court Hist, de I'Art, iv, ii. pi. 3. — -The workmanship of the hair was made at this time more and more easy, inasmuch as holes were only bored here and there in the thick masses of stones. 4, The arch of Constantine (the bands over the smaUer side-arches refer to the conquest over Maxentius and the capture of Rome) in Bel lori, comp. Agincourt, pi. 2. Hirt Mus. der Alterthumsw. i. s. 266. The Theodosian column appears to have been erected by Arcadius in honour of Theodosius (according to others by Theodosius the Second to Arca dius); it was of marble, with a stair inside, an imitation of Trajan's; there is nothing more now standing than the pedestal at Constantinople. Col. Theod. quam vulgo historiatam vocant, ab Arcadio Imp. Constan- tinopoU erecta in honorem Imp. Theodosii a Gent. BeUino deUneata nunc primum sere sculpta (Text by Menetrius) P. 1702. Agincourt, pL 11, ReUefs from the pedestal of the obeUsk, Montfaucon Ant, Expl, iii, 187, Agincourt, pi, 10, Comp. PiorUlo Hist, of Art in Italy, p. 18. — A circu lar stone figure turned round by two-winged Seasons is described by Max. Planudes in Boissonade Anecd. Gr. u. p. 320. 5. See especially the sarcophagus with Christ, the apostles, evange lists and EUas, in the Louvre 764. 76. 77, in BouiUon iii. pi. 65 (Clarac iii CONSTANTINE AND HIS SUCCESSORS. 190 pi. 227), and comp. the plates immediately foUowing. Many from the catacombs in Roman museums [especiaUy in the Ubrary of the Vatican, also in the Lateran Museum, in Pisa and other places], in Aringhi and Aginc. pi. 4 — 6. Gerhard Ant, Bildw, 76, 2, Comp, Sickler Almanach i. s. 173, A sculptor named Daniel under Theodoric had a privUegium for marble sarcophagi, Cassiodor. Var, iii, 19. Eutropus, an artist of the same description, Fabretti Inscr. v, 102. Christian artists among the martyrs (Baronius Ann. ad a. 303). A Christian artifex signarius Mura- tori, p. 963, 4. 6. On the honour of statues in later Rome, see the Ed. Winck. (after Fea) vi. s. 410 ff., under the Ostrogoths, Manso, Gesch. des Ostgoth. Reichs, s. 403. As a reward to poets, in Merobaudes, see Niebuhr Merob. p. vu. (1824) ; at Byzantium even female dancers had statues erected to them. Anth. Planud. iv, 283 sqq. — The equestrian statue of Justinian in the Augustseon (which, according to Malalas, had formerly represent ed Arcadius) was in heroic costume, which at that time already seemed strange, but held in his left hand the terrestrial globe with the cross, according to Procop. de sedif. Just, i, 2. Rhetor, ed. Walz. i. p. 578. Magnificent picture of the emperor with the globe in his hand, Basilius in Vales, ad Ammian. xxv, 10, 2. A memoir by MarulU on the bronze colossus at Barletta in ApuUa (Fea, Storia delle Arti ii. tv. 11) ; accord ing to Visconti (Icon. Bom. iv. p. 166.) it is Heraclius, [Theodosius ac cording to MarulU II colosso di bronzo esistente nella cittk di Barletta, Nap. 1816. 8vo.] In the projected treaty between Justinian and Theo- datus, in Procopius, it was formally arranged that the Gothic king should have no statue without the emperor, and should always stand on the left. — Even now the fierxy^dcpeiv was very common. Bd. Winck. vi. s. 406. comp. §. 158. R. 4. P. Br. MiiUer gives a very accurate picture of the spirit of the time De genio sevi Theodos. p. 161 sqq. 7, The use of gems, mostly indeed cameos, on vases (GaUienus him self made some of the kind, TrebeU, 16), on the balteus, the fihulcs, ccdigm, and socci (HeUogabalus wore gems by the first artists on his feet, Lam prid, 23), was very much diffused at this later period of the emperors. The conqueror of Zenobia dedicated in the temple of the Sun garments joined together with gems, Vopisc, Aurel, 28; Claudian describes the court dress of Honorius as sparkling with amethysts and hyacinths ; af ter the emperor Leo (Codex xi, 11), certain works of the kind were only aUowed to be made by the Palatini artifices, — Hence the careful work manship on gems and cameos down to a late period. A sardonyx in the Cabinet du Roi at Paris : Constantine on horseback smiting down his adversary ; a sardonyx at St, Petersburg : Constantine and Fausta, Mongez, pi. 61, 5 ; Constantinus II. on a large agate onyx, Lippert iii, ii, 460; a sapphire at Florence: a chase by the emperor Constantius at Csesarea in Cappadocia, Prober, Sapphirus Constantii Imp. Banduri Nu mism. Suppl. tb. 12. — are celebrated. At Byzantium cameos of blood jasper in particular were carefuUy wrought; several of the kind with Christian subjects in the cabinet of antiques at Vienna, — Hellas argen tarius, died 406. Gruter, p. 1053, 4. Heyne, Artes ex Constantinopoli nunquam prorsus exulantes. Com mentat. Gott. iii. p. 3. 200 HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Per. V. 4. PAINTING. 1 208. Painting came forth at the time of Cffisar in a second 2 bloom which soon faded. Subjects of the highest tragic suf fering, — the deeply mortified Ajax brooding over his wrath, Medea before the murder of her children, full of fury, and compassion at the same time in her weeping eyes, — then seem ed to the most distinguished artists materials of especial excel- 3 lence. Portrait-painting was at the same time in request ; Lala painted chiefly women, also her own likeness from a mirror. 1, Timomachus of Byzantium, about 660 (Zumpt ad Cic, Verr, iv, 60), Lala of Cyzicus — then one of the chief seats of painting — about 670 (et penicUlo pinxit et cestro in ebore), Sopolis, Dionysius, contem poraries, AreUius, about 710, The dumb boy Pedius, about 720. The Greek painter of the temple of Juno at Ardea Uved perhaps about 650 — 700. Comp. SiUig C, A, p, 246. and the author's Etrusker ii. s. 258. 2. Timomachus' Ajax and Medea, pictures much praised in epigrams, purchased by Csesar for 80 talents (probably from the Cyzioans) Cic, ibid, comp, PUn, xxxv, 9,), and dedicated in the temple of Venus Genetrix, Bottiger, Vasengemalde ii, s, 188, Sillig C. A, p, 450, The Medea is re cognised from the epigrams of the anthology in a figure from Hercula neum (Ant, di Ercol. i, 13, M, Borbon. x, 21.) and a picture found in Pompeii (M. Borbon. v, 33), and in gems (Lippert, Suppl. i, 93, &c.) Panofka Ann. d. Inst. i. p. 243. On the Ajax, Welcker, Rhein. Mus. iii, i. s. 82. Timomachus' Orestes and Iphigenia in Tauris (as we must in fer from PUny xxxv, 40, 30) were also from tragedy. [A Diogenes Albi nus pictor in Gaul is assigned to the end of the first century, from the characters of the Latin inscription. Revue archaol. iii. p. 511. 583.] 209. At the time of the emperors we find easel painting — which was alone held to be true art, at least its main branch — neglected, and wall-painting practised in preference, as the handmaid of luxury. Pliny in the time of Vespasian regards painting as a perishing art ; he complains that with the most splendid colours nothing worth speaking of was produced. Scenography, which had taken a fantastic direction, especially in Asia Minor, in which it scouted all the rules of architec ture, was now transferred to the decoration of apartments, where it was developed if possible in a still more arbitrary manner; artists delighted in playing a transparent and airy architecture over into vegetable and strangely compounded forms. Landscape-painting was also conceived in a peculiar manner by Ludius in the time of Augustus, and unfolded into a new species. He painted as room-decorations villas and porticoes, artificial gardens (topiaria opera), parks, streams, i i i PAINTING AT THE TIME OF THE FIRST C^SARR, 201 canals, sea-ports and marine views, enlivened with figures in rural occupations and all sorts of comic situations — very sprightly and pleasing pictures. The time also delighted in 5 tricks of all kinds ; in Nero's golden house a Pallas by Fabul- lus was admired, which looked at every one who directed his eyes towards her. The picture of Nero, 120 feet high, on canvass, is justly reckoned by Pliny among the fooleries of the age. 1. Painters of the time ; Ludius, about 730, Antistius Labeo [the manuscripts Titedius, Titidius] vir prsetorius, about 40 a. d, TurpUius Labeo Eq. Rom, about 50. Dorotheus, 60, FabuUus (AmuUus), the painter of the golden house (the prison of his art), 60. Cornelius Pinus, Accius Prisons, who painted the waUs of the Temple of Honour and Virtue, 70. Artemidorus, 80. PubUus, animal painter, about 90. Mar tial i, 110. Workers in mosaic at Pompeii: Dioscurides of Samos, M. Borb. iv, 34. HeracUtus, HaU. ALZ. 1833. InteU. 57. comp. §. 210, 6. 2. See PUn. xxxv, 1. 2. 11. 37. Comp. the later testimony of Petro- nius, c. 88. [Philostr. Imag. ed. Jacobs, p. lix sq.] On the external luxury, PUn. xxxv, 32. and Vitruv. vii, 6. Quam subtilitas artificis ad- jiciebat operibus auctoritatem, nunc dominicus sumptus efficit ne desi- deretur. 3. See Vitruvius' (vu, 5) accounts of a scene which Apaturius of Ala- banda fitted up and painted in a smaU theatre at Tralles. Lioinius a mathematician occasioned the destruction of the Alabandian work ; Vi truvius wishes that his time had one Uke it. Pinguntur tectorus mon stra potius quam ex rebus finitis imagines certse. Pro columnis enim statuuntur calami, pro fastigiis harpaginetuU striati cum crispis foUis et volutis ; item candelabra sedicularum sustinentia figuras, etc. 4. PUn. xxxv, 37. — Vitruvius speaks altogether of the following classes of waU-paintings : 1. Imitations of architectural mouldings, mar ble-tablets in rooms and the like, as being the earUest decorations in colours; 2. Architectural views on a large scale, in the scenographic manner ; 3. Tragic, comic, and satyric scenes in large rooms (exedrae) ; 4. Landscape pictures (varietates topiorum) in the ambulationes ; 5. His torical pictures (megalographia), figures of the gods, mythological scenes ; also accompanied with landscapes (topia). 5. Plin. ib. Comp. Lucian De Dea Syr. 32. 210. With this character of art, which may be gathered 1 from the testimonies of ancient writers, correspond completely the numerous monuments of wall-painting which extend from the time of Augustus till that of the Antonines with nearly an equal degree of merit: the paintings in the tomb of Ces- 2 tius (§. 190, 1), those in the chambers of Nero's house (§. 190, 2), which are decorated in a particularly brilliant and careful manner ; the large and constantly increasing treasure of mural 3 paintings from Herculanum, Pompeii and Stabise; as well as those in the tomb of the Nasones, and numerous others in 4 202 HISTORY OP GREEK ART. [Per. V. ancient buildings found here and there, in all of which the art exhibits, even in its degenerate state, inexhaustible inven- i tion and productiveness. The spaces divided and disposed in the most tasteful manner; arabesques of admirable richness of fancy ; scenographies quite in that playful and light archi tectural style; the roofs in the form of arbours hung with garlands interspersed with fiuttering winged forms; landscapes in the manner of Ludius, for the most part but slightly indi- i cated; moreover figures of deities and mythological scenes, many carefully, the greater number hastily designed, but often possessing an inimitable charm (especially those floating freely in the middle of larger compartments) ; all this and more in lively colours and simple illumination, clearly and agreeably arranged and executed, with much feeling for har mony of colour and an architectonic general effect. Much of this was certainly copied from earlier painters, nay the whole study of many artists consisted in the accurate reproduction of old pictures. 2. Histoire Critique de la Pyramide de C. Cestius par I'Abbe Rive (with engravings from designs by M. Carloni). P. 1787. — Description des Bains de Titus — sous la direction de Ponce. P. 1787. 3 Livraisons. Terme di Tito, a large work with plates after drawings by Smugliewicz, engraved by M. Carloni. Sickler's Almanach U. Tf 1 — 7. s. 1. 3. Antichitk di Brcolano, i — iv. vii. Pitture Antiche. N. 1757 sqq. 65, 79, GU ornati deUe pareti ed i pavimenti delle stanze dell' antica PompeU inoisi in rame. N, 1808, 2 vols, fo. Zahn, Neuentdeckte Wand gemalde in Pompeu in 40 Steinabdriicken, The same author, Die Schonsten Ornamente und merkwiirdigsten Gemalde aus Pomp,, Here. u, Stabia [1828 100 pi, 2d Series 1842, 1844, 100 pi. Real, Museo Borbon, R. Rochette, Peintures de Pompee from 1844, 3 livr. Wandgem. aus Pom peii u. Herculanum von W. Ternite, Berlin, Reimer 3 Lief and Reimarus also 3 Lief up to this time. Text of the first part by K. 0. Miiller, of the rest by Welcker.] Much in Mazois, GeU, Goro, R. Rochette (see §. 190, 4). [Pianta de' scavi deUa VUla GiuUa (?) fra Brcolano ed Oplonti Nap. No. 24. 27.] 4. P, S, Bartoli: GU antichi Sepolcri, R. 1797. (Veterum sepulcra, Thes. Antiqq. Gr. xii.). By the same: Le pitture ant. delle grotte di Roma e del sepolcro dei Nasoni (of the time of the Antonines, discovered in 1675). R. 1706. 1721. fo., with explanations by Bellori and Causeus (also in Latin. B. 1738), [and in the Thes. Ant. Rom. Thes. T. xii.]. Bar toli Recueil de Peintures Antiques T. i. ii. Sec ed. P. 1783. Collection de Peintures Antiques qui ornaient les Palais, Thermes, &c. des Emp. Tite, Trajan, Adrien et Constantin. R. 1781. [Ponce Bains de Titus. P. 1786. fol. Paintings from the baths of Titus Sickler Almanach aus Rom. ii. Tf 1 — 7, Landon Choix des plus eel, peint, P. 1820, 4to.] Arabesques Antiques des Bains de Livie et de la Ville Adrienne, engraved by Ponce after Raphael. P. 1789. Pitture Antiche ritrov. nello scavo aperto 1780, incise e pubbl. da G. M. Cassini. 1783. Cabott, Stucchi figurati essist. in PAINTING AT THE TIME OP THE FIRST CESARS, 203 un antico sepolcro fuori delle mura di Roma, R. 1795, Parietinas Pic- turas inter Esqu, et Viminalem CoUem super, anno detectas in ruderibus privatsB domus, D. Antonini Pii sevo depictas (two pictures in the Pein tures qui ornaient — no, 4. if it be the same picture, quite correspond with the representation on the coin of Lucilla, Num. Mus, Pisani tb, 25, 3) in tabulis expressas ed, C, Buti Archit. Raph, Mengs del. CamparoUi so. 1788. 7 very fine plates (Pitture antiche deUa viUa Negroni). [The picture in the Vatican from Torre Marancia in the Mon. Amaranziani. R. 1843. Wall paintings of a dweUing house in Catania, Ann. d. Inst. ix. p. 60. 177. of another in Anaphe, Ross in the Abhdl, der Miinchner Akad. ii. Tf 3 A. s. 449, of a tomb in Apulia, Archaol. Int. Bl. 1835. s. 11. comp. 1837. s. 49. Others in Cyrene, in Pacho. Comp. the passages of Aris tides on Corinth, of Dio and Themistius in R. Rochette Peint. Ant. p. 198, Clem. Alex. Protr. p. 52 s. Pott. Sidonius ApolUnaris Epist. ii, 11.] For general accounts comp. Winck. v. s. 166 ff. 6. Besides these floating forms of dancing nymphs, centaurs and bacchantes, Pitt. Ere. i. 25 — 28, Winckelmann praises most the four pic tures, iv, 41 — 44. Designs (retouched?) by Alexander of Athens on marble, i, 1-^. [which H. Meyer on Winck. v. s. 473 appreciates better than W. himself.] Among the historical pictures of Pompeii the carrying away of Briseis by AchiUes is particularly noted (R. Rochette M. I, i, 19. GeU New S. 39. 40. Zahn Wandgem. 7) [as well as the Chryseis and the visit of Hera to Zeus on Ida from the same so-caUed Homeric house] ; of others, the picture in R. Rochette M. I. i, 9. Gell 83, distinguished by its treatment of the light (Hypnus and Pasithea according to Hirt, Mars and lUa according to R, Rochette, Dionysus and Aura according to Lenormant, D. and Ariadne according to Guarini, Zephyrus and Flora according to JaneUi and others, see Bull. d. Inst. 1834, p. 186 sq,) ; also the enigmatical picture, Gell, 48, Zahn 20, R. Rochette, Pomp&, pi. 15, representing the birth of Leda, or a nest with Erotes (Hirt, Ann. d. Inst. i, p. 251). [Certainly the former, with reference to the legend in the Cypr,] Others in the 2d Part, On the pieces of rhyparography [rhopo graphy] Welcker ad PhUostr. p. 397. The pictures consisting of mere blurs of paint, and only intelUgible at a distance (GeU, p, 165), remind us of the compend. via §. 163, ' 7, [These paintings form two classes, imitations of earlier works of every kind, and new, Roman pictures : BuU, 1841, p, 107,] Quintil. x, 2. ut describere tabulas mensuris ac Uneis sciant. Lucian Zeuxis 3. riig tixovog rxiirtig xiiriy^xCPog iari viJv ' AStiiVYiai 'Tc^og xiir'riv ixeivriv dx^i/iei rri ffTaS|£«jj fitrevnveyfiivri. [exemplar quod apographon vocant, Plin, xxxv, 40, 23. fiipin/ix Pausan. viii, 9, 4. cf SiebeUs.], 211. In the age of Hadrian painting also must have re vived once more with the other arts. To it belonged ^tion, whom Lucian ranks with the first masters, and whose charm ing picture of Alexander and Roxane, with Erotes busied about them and the king's armour, he cannot sufficiently praise. On the whole, however, painting continued to sink 204 HISTORY OF GREEK ART, [Per, V, gradually into a mere daubing of colours ; and it was com monly an occupation of slaves to fill the walls with pictures in the most expeditious manner, according to the pleasure and caprice of their masters, 1. Mtion is elsewhere placed in the time of Alexander (even by Hirt Gesch. der. BUd, Kunste, s, 265), but Lucian says distinctly that he did not live in ancient times, but quite recently (rd reXevrxix rxirx Herod, 4), therefore probably in the age of Hadrian and the Antonines. Comp. besides Imagg. 7. Hadrian himself was a rhyparographer [§. 163. R. 5.] ; Apollodorus said to him : "Aveyi^e xxi rdg xo'hax-vviixg y^xlf<'«'ri we^itpepig, av ij fiiv oXyi 'jre^iy^xipvi Trx^xTrT^riaix pohotg iirl fAix^ov dvx'TreTrrxpcivotg iirriv. Tre^i oe rov ¦jT^otrxyo^evoff.evov xx'hx^ov oiix ehixsg, xx^xTre^ iTri rav 'E.T^'Knvixav, xxi (pi/Khx r^xxex Tre^ixeirxi, "Karav Sg Trorx/xiav xd'Kvxeg xxi (poivixuv d^ifiXda- rav xxprog' earl S' ot-£ xxi TrXeiovau xKKav xv^eav yiyXvKrxi yivrj. ro 0 VTTo rviv pi^xv, 0 8^ ra avvx-Trrovri -Trqag r^v xetf dv^Ptxvrxg dve^rixsv iv rrt^e rri ^xaiXeiof., ^ea'^orrig Aiyv-jrroVj xxi ixotr- firKTSv Hxiov voKiv opiolag xxi xvroi/ "HT^iov ^eaxornv ov^ccvoij' avvereXevrmev spyov dyx^oV 'HT^iov 'jrxig ^xat>^evg xiav6(iiog. [Irixog TgiVof.] Wanting. [To lio^eiov.] I'Srixog ¦'r^arog.'l General superscription. "H?i;of 'Setrirorng ov^xvov ' Px- fiiarfi jixaiTiii' isia^rifixi aoi to xjarof xxi r^v xxrd xxvrav i^ovaixv. The first column is wanting. [^rixog hvre^og.] Wanting. 'Srrixag r^irog. ' A-aiiKKav \_x^«/ze^og\ (pA«X^9ns teaitorrig xiovav, [&] xxi "IK^xiarog 6 rav deav xxr^^ ir^oex^ivev 'iid rov" A^ex' /ixoriXeiig ^Vxpiiarrig'] TTXyx^S^l ' axiov vxig xxi viro' 'H'kIov CpiXovpitvog' [^xaiXevg 'Fxfiiimig . . . . .] ' A(pyiXiarng. "Srrixos ¦^^arog. Superscription : ' 0 «(p' ' Hx/ou iroKeug pt,iyxg iiedg ivov^x- viog [' Vxpcearri jixaiheV leia^nfixl not ] 222 EGYPTIAN ART. ' A'TToXXuv x^xreqog [?)i?v«?i^&i7j] "H^mjof viog, ov"H7iiog iiyaynaev, ov oi ^eol iripiriffxv, 6 TTxang yvig /ixaiT^evav, ov"iiXtog "Tr^oix^ivev' 6 xJ^xi/xog S/« rov " A^sx fixaiXevg, ov" Aptpt^av (piKei \_V xpt.etirrig\ xxi 6 'Trapt^iyyrig ovyx^tvxg xiaviov (ixaiXex . . . . {^ixog Seutsjo?.] Wanting. [Sr/pco; Tf iVof,] Wanting. The dedicatory inscription of an obeUsk which Sesonchosis consecrated to Serapis is more briefiy quoted by Jul, Valerius De r. g. Alex, i, 31, Comp, besides Zoega De Ob, p, 593, Heeren Ideen u, 2, s, 415. Cham poUion, Precis, p, 146 sqq, 5, Many of the obeUsks at Rome were executed later and in a rude and counterfeit style, such as the PanfiU, the Barberini, and the SaUus- tian according to Zoega. Among the old and genuine Egyptian obeUsks the foUowing are of especial importance : a. That dedicated by Thutmosis, brought from Thebes to Alex andria, and taken to Rome by Constantius II. and erected in the Circus, the largest of all there (formerly 148, now 144 palmi), erected in front of the Lateran by Fontana in 1687 under Sixtus V, Engraved in Kir- cher. b. The one erected at Heliopolis by Semenpserteus (according to Pliny, but here we must assume that this one is confounded with the next), that is, Psammetichus, whose name we can still read upon it; raised by Augustus in the Campus as a gnomon, 72 or 76 feet high ac cording to the ancients, 94J palmi according to modern authorities, again erected by Pius VI, on Monte Citorio, (This one has only 2, not 3 columns,) Engraved in Zoega, Bandini, Comm. De obelisco Augusti. 1750. fo. c. That dedicated by Sesostris or Ramesses the Great (on the sup position of a confounding) at Heliopolis, erected by Augustus in the Circus, and by Fontana in 1589 at the Porta del Popolo (hence the Flaminian), according to the ancients 85, 87 or 88 feet, now 107 (formerly 1 10) palmi. In Kircher. According to Ammian this could only be the one explained by Hermapion ; and accordingly Ramesses' name is always correctly found in the first and third column ; but in the second invariably an other, Manduei according to ChampolUon, who on this account maintains that there is a complete difference between the two. (May not this cartouche be merely the designation of HeUopolis ?) d. The obeUsk at Constantinople §. 193, 4, the erection of which is represented on its base. e. f. The two finest in Egypt were the Thebaic obeUsks at Luxor, 110 palmi high, the hieroglyphics of which are arranged in the same manner as in Hermapion. Descr. iii. pi. 2. MinutoU, Tf 16 — 19. One of them has lately been brought to Paris. Others at Thebes, also at HeliopoUs. ObeUsk at Luxor, AnnaU d. I. v. p. 299. g. That at Alexandria, the so-caUed needle of Cleopatra. — Tho an cients speak of stiU larger ones than those extant ; Diodorus mentions one of Sesostris 120 Egyptian cubits in height. PALACES, MONUMENTS, PYRAMIDS. 223 Mich, Mercati, Degli Obelisci di Roma. R, 1689, 4to. Athan. Kircher, (Edipus Bgyptiacus. R. 1652—64. 3 vols. fo. ObeUscus PamphUius by the same. 1650. Obelisci jEgyptiaci prssterito anno inter rudera tempU Minervse effossi interpretatio. 1666. Zoega, De origine et usu Obelisco- rum. R. 1797. Cipriani, Sui dodici Ob. Eg. che adornano la cittk di Roma, R. 1823. Rondelet, L'art de Bath- T. i. pi. 1. [UngareUi Inter pretatio obeUscorum urbis ad Gregorium XVI. R. 1842. fol. comp. BuUett. 1834, p. 159.] 225. The palaces of the kings in Egypt are decided imi tations of the temples, as the statues of the kings are of the images of the gods, and the main difference as regards the architecture is only this, that the rooms, especially the hypo style apartments, are still larger (as in the colossal palace of Carnac), and the really habitable chambers behind are more spacious and in greater number. Neither is the design of the mausolea essentially different, according to Diodorus' descrip tion of the Osmandyeion. Adjoining the courts and porticoes, there are here dining apartments and a library ; as a termina tion to the whole rises the tomb, which is placed in the high est part, and which the prince erected to himself during his lifetime. 1. In the palace of Carnac four pylons succeed one another ; a hypo style apartment of 318 X 169 feet, with 134 columns, the highest 70 feet high. Descr. iii. The Labyrinth was a coUective palace of many rulers (built, according to Herodotus, by the Dodecarchi, in the opinion of Strabo, by Ismandes, according to Manetho by Lachares (Laboris, Sesostris' successor, of the twelfth dynasty), according to Diodorus, by Mendes) ; the pyramid as a finish occupied the place of the ra(pog in the Osmandyeion. On the de sign of the whole comp, Letronne on the G^ogr, de Strabon T, v, p, 407,, and in Maltebrun's N, Annales des Voy. T. vi, p, 133, 2. The ruins (Descr. ii. pi, 27 sqq.) which JoUois and Devilliers took for the Osmandyeion described by Hecatseus of Abdera, are not nearly so grand as it was, but show, however, great correspondence in the gen eral plan of both mausolea. Letronne, M6m, sur le Mon, d'Osymandyas, doubts the existence of the Osym, of Hecatseus ; Gail Philologue xiii. and M6m. de I'Inst. Boy. viii, p. 131, defends the opinion of the authors of the Descr. Osymandyas or Ismandes was not an historical name of a king, it was only a surname probably of buUders of great monuments ; accord ing to Strabo, Amenophis-Memnon was especially so caUed (xvii. p. 813, comp, 811. Comp. §. 218. R. 3. 226. The rest of the sepulchral monuments fall into two i classes. 1. The pyramids, — quadrangular and rectangular tumuli (a form of barrows, which is also found elsewhere in the East) were structures of enormous extent. The largest 2 224 EGYPTIAN ART. stand on plateaux among the Libyan ridge of hills round about Memphis, in several partly symmetrical groups surrounded by artificial roads, embankments, tombs, and hypogea. The foundation, which is a square, faces the four cardinal points. They were first piled up in large terraces of limestone (only the smaller pyramids are of brick), and then the terraces were filled up; they were reveted with stones which received polish, and were also adorned with sculptures; the facing is now mostly taken away. The entrance to the interior, which was closed by a single stone capable of being removed, is dif ficult to find; through it you pass first into narrower and broader galleries which at length lead to one or more cham bers; the largest contains the sarcophagus of the king. There is nowhere to be found a trace of vaulting. Perpendicular pits (such a one has been discovered in the pyramid of Cheops) probably led to the Nile-canal, spoken of by Herodotus, which was cut in the foundation rock. 2. [Zoega de Obel., p. 379 — 414.] The pyramid of Cheops, the great est of all, at Ghizeh, is, according to Grobert (Descript. des Pyr. de Ghize), 728 Par. feet long on each side, according to Jomard (Descr. T. ii. ch. 18, and the Memoires connected therewith, T. ii. p. 163) 699, and according to CouteUe (M6m. ii. p. 39.) 716| ; the vertical height 448, or 422, or 428J feet. The breadth of the second, that of Chephrenes, is reckoned by Belzoni (who opened it) at 663 English feet, and its height at 437|. According to Herodotus, 100,000 men worked at the former for forty years ; there are counted 203 courses of stones, each from 19 inches to 4 feet 4 inches high. The Nubian pyramids are much smaller, of more slender form, with a projecting torus at each angle, and mostly of brick. Not unfrequently they have porticoes with pylons, and sculptures and hieroglyphics upon them. CaiUiaud i. pi. 40 sqq. 3. See as to the erection, PUn. xxxvi, 17. Herod, ii, 125. Meister, De Pyramidum .iEgypt. Fabrica et Fine, N. Comtr. Soc. Gott. V. cl. phys. p. 192,, particularly Hirt Von den Pyramiden. B. 1815. Building with bricks was otherwise very common in Bgypt ; private buildings probably consisted of them for the most part. Comp. Aristoph. Birds 1133. comp. RoseUini II, ii. ReUefs on the brick preparation by the Jews. Herodotus mentions sculptures on pyramids ii, 148 ; they are lost with the facing. In the interior no hieroglyphics have been found except on a door in the one recently opened at Saccarah. MinutoU, Tf 28, 4. a. 4. Sometimes long slabs of stone laid across form the roof of the pas sages; the waUs of the broader gaUeries also converge upwards; and sometimes the stones lean against one another in the form of a gable ; in the principal apartment of the pyramid of Cheops there is a double pla fond. This chamber is 18 feet high, 32 long, and 16 broad, surrounded by square blocks of granite without any ornament whatever. Caviglia, in particular, has lately penetrated far into the interior of this pyramid. Among the earlier writers on pyramids, de Sacy in Abdallatif, Langles HYPOGEA. 225 on Nordens Voy. T. iii.. Beck, Anleitung zur Kenntniss der Weltgesch. i. s. 705 ff., are instructive. Sylv. de Sacy sur les noms des pyramides in the Mag. enoycl. a. vi. N. vi. p. 419. [J. J. Ampere Voyage et re cherches en Eg. et en Nubie, ui. Pyramides, in the Revue des deux blondes T. xvi, p, 660—89.] 227. II. Subterranean structures hewn out of the rocks, 1 HYPOGEA, These lie along the Nile throughout the Libyan ridge of hills, and under the contiguous plains of sand. The 2 largest have an open court in front, an arched entrance (arches constructed of cuneiform stones doubtless belong altogether to the Grecian period) ; then follow galleries, 3 chambers, halls, side galleries with shafts or pits, in which lie mummies; as a finish to the whole, there are often alcoves with niches, in which sit images of the gods in alto relievo. The size of the galleries and apartments varies very much (the mummies often scarcely left space enough to pass), the disposition extremely labyrinthine. The Greeks called them Syringes, holed passages. The tombs of the kings in the val- 4 ley above the necropolis of Thebes are on a larger scale; the galleries, which usually incline downwards, are broader; the apartments larger, and provided with pillars, which support the roof In the tomb discovered by Belzoni, the chief apart ment is hewn out in the form of a vault, very large, and de corated with great magnificence; in it stood a very thin- wrought sarcophagus of alabaster, which, doubtless, was en closed in one still more colossal, and again itself contained many others, like so many pill-boxes. 1. JoUois and Jomard on the hypogea, Descr. T. i. ch. 9, 5. 10. Among the ancients especiaUy HeUodorus iEth. ii, 27. Ammian xxii, 15. 2. What is said holds good of the arch, of which there is a drawing in Belzoni pi. 44 n. 2. (the other given there is not one, properly speak ing). Comp. CaiUiaud Voy. k M6ro6 ii. pi. 33. 4. See Costaz, Descr. T. i. ch. 9, 5. 11. Belzoni, pi, 39. 40. Belzoni even exhibited a model of this tomb at London and Paris, Description of the Eg, Tomb discovered by G. Belzoni. L. 1822. It certainly belonged te a Thebaic king, Ousirei-Akencheres I., of the eighteenth dynasty, ac cording to ChampoUion, to Menephthah I. father of Rhamses-Sesostris according to the Beschr. Roms ii, 2. s. 439. The third grotto on the west side of the valley was called, according to Greek inscriptions, the Mem- nonian Syrinx, Trans, of the Roy. Society of Literature I, i. p. 227. II, i. p. 70. The Lower Nubian monuments, the destination of which is, for the most part, very uncertain, might in some instances have been merely honorary monuments, cenotaphs, of Egyptian kings. The earUer ones in the valley towards the west. Thus the great grotto of Ibsamboul is evidently a monument of Ramses the Great, of whom the colossi at the entrance are likenesses, and whose reception among the gods is repre- P 226 EGYPTIAN ART. sented in the group of statues in the innermost niche. The smaUer grotto close by is a monument of his pious devotion to the gods, especially Athor. 3. PLASTIC ARTS AND PAINTING. A. TECHNICS AND TREATMENT 01? FORMS. 228. The Egyptians were particularly great in stone-sculp ture. Among them the plastic art bore in materials and form an architectonic character. Their statues, often hewn with masterly precision out of the hardest stone, granite, syenite, porphyry, or basanite, for the most part a fine-grained sand stone, and on a smaller scale, hsematite, serpentine, and alabas ter, were generally destined to lean against pillars, walls, and pylons, and to decorate architectural surfaces. In sitting figures, therefore, there reigns the most perfect composure and regularity of posture ; those that are standing stride out in a stiff' manner; the arms lie close to the body. The size is often very colossal, and the transport of these colossi was an extremely difficult problem. The treatment of forms passes constantly into generalities, it has a certain regularity therein, and produces a great impression by the simple sweep of the main lines ; but the forms are more geometrical than organic, and life and warmth are altogether wanting in the conception of the details. The individual parts of the body are fashioned after a national fundamental type ; the Egyptian artists fol lowed likewise an established system of proportions. How ever, in the proportions and forms there are also observable deviations, which depend on difference of district and time. The forms of the sexes are well distinguished; but, on the other hand, nothing certain has hitherto been discovered as to the characteristic portraitures of different individuals by modification of form, or a clear distinction in the formation of gods and kings. Egyptian art distinguishes persons by col our, by dress, which is treated carefully but stiffly, more espe cially by the great varieties of head-dress, and, lastly, by the adjuncts of animals' heads, wings, and other members. The animal form was conceived with more depth and liveliness than that of man ; from the first the Egyptians were impelled to an admiring observation of the former, by a natural ten dency, as their religion proves ; their combinations too of va rious animal figures are often very happy, but often indeed also in the highest degree fantastical and bizarre. 3. The colossus of the Ramesseion (the so-caUed Osymandyeion) is reckoned from the fragments to have been 63 Par. feet 10 in. high ; the Osymandyas of Diodorus was about 60 feet high. The Thebaic reUef in MinutoU, pi. 13. shows the mode of transportation. SCULPTURE, 227 5, According to Diodorus i, 98. the Egyptian artists divided the hu man body, that is to say, its length, into 21|- parts ; wherein the length of the nose probably formed the unit. The breast generaUy broad; the body narrower below; the neck short; the feet, particularly the toes, long; the knees sharply marked, and often treated with especial care and precision. The nose broad and round ; the eyes (which were sometimes inserted) prominent ; the arch of the forehead without sharp ness ; the corners of the eyes and mouth somewhat turned up, the mouth broad and the Ups thick ; the chin mostly rather small ; the ears long and placed high. The last is a peculiarity of the race, according to Du- reau de la JMalle, Ann. des Sciences Natur. 1832, AvrU, The beard ap pears to have been an artificial one fixed on, and the ties securing it can often be distinctly perceived along the cheeks. With regard to the hair of the head, we see a lock hanging out only in Phthas, Vid. especially the colossal granite head of the Great Ramses from the Ramesseion, now in the British Museum, Descr. ii. pi. 32. better in Nohden, Amalthea ii. s. 127. Specimens U, 1. Hieroglyph, pi. 10. 6. The principal deviations seem to be : 1. The softer forms, approach ing more to the Grecian Ideals, of many, especiaUy smaUer figures of later times, 2, The clumsier proportions and forms which are found particu larly in Upper Nubia, Women with large bellies and hanging breasts (CaiUiaud i, pi. 20. comp. Juvenal xiii, 163). In other cases more severe design and more sharp and laborious workmanship are in general indica tions of higher antiquity ; the sculptures of the later times of the Pto lemies and Romans are recognisable by their carelessness and want of character. Rosselini II. ii. but the greatest industry under the suc ceeding kings. Under the Ptolemies the figures weU rounded aud the muscles developed. MinutoU Einige Worte ueber die verschiedenheit des Styls in den Aeg. Kunstdenkm. so wie ueber ihre Aehnlichkeit und scheinbare Stammverwandtschaft mit denen andrer Volkerschaften B. 1835. Heidelb. Jahrb. 1835. S. 37 fg. 7. Portrait, Amasis, Herod, ii, 182. 8. The principal dress of the Egyptians was woollen chitons {livaaivxi xx'Kxaiiiieg) ; in men often nothing more than a piece of cloth thrown around the loins {aivtoveg girded under the breast, Diod. i, 72). Although very thin and soft, when starched however they form rectilinear and prominent folds. The stripes of the stuff are indicated by sculpture, often also by colours. Breast-plates were a principal ornament. A close fitting cap, the general national costume, is heightened and adorned in a variety of ways so as to denote priestly dignity. Connected herewith are the lixaiheixi (comp. Diodor. i. 47.) with da-Ttileg and tpvXxxrii^ix in the inscription from Rosetta, among these the Trax^vr, as to the form of which Young and ChampoUion differ. Denon pi. 115 gives 30 coeffures 9. Rams (but mostly with Uon's claws and tail), lions, wild dogs or jackals, aU sorts of apes (xwoxicfixXoi), ibises, (fee. are most frequent. Ex cellent drawings of nearly aU Egyptian birds and quadrupeds are col lected in Rosellini's Monum. dell' Eg, Atlas i. Granite lion, Specim. ii, 2. — Sphinxes or androsphinxes are lions with human heads. The enor mous one at Ghizeh, which CavigUa has laid open, is hewn out of the 228 EGYPTIAN ART, rock, with the exception of the fore-paws, between which stood a small temple. Hieroglyph, pi, 80, Other combinations ; lion-hawks, Uon- ursei with wings, serpent-vultures, serpents with human legs, and the like. While the Greeks for the most part retained the human head in such compositions, the Egyptians sacrificed it first, 1 229. The transference of the optical image of the human body to a surface, the representation of it in relief, was a pro blem in which the Egyptians were not nearly so successful as 2 in the round statue. The striving, natural to art in its in fancy, to represent every portion of the body in a form as dis tinct and intelligible as possible, here operates universally so 3 as to fetter and impede. For subjects drawn from religion there was formed an almost typical manner of representing the body and its movements; more nature prevails in the conception of domestic scenes; but when art tries to depict warlike events of great compass, the defects of the artist are rendered most manifest from the striving after multiplicity of actions and gestures; such subjects also are more negligently 4 handled. The reliefs of the Egyptians are more rarely bas- reliefs properly so-called, such as are found on stone tablets and steles, with very slight elevation from the surface; more commonly they are so-called koilanaglypha, bas-reliefs en creux, 5 in which the forms rise from a depressed surface. The dimly handled relief then separates itself agreeably from the polished surface around it, without unpleasantly interrupting the archi- 6 tectonic impression. The sharpness and precision in the workmanship of the figures, which are often sculptured toler ably deep, are worthy of admiration. However, they have often also been satisfied with engraving mere outlines, espe cially on external walls. 2. Hence the breast in front view, hips and legs in profile, also the head (the front view of heads is often found in hieroglyphics, also some times in freer representations, such as battle-pieces, but extremely seldom in reUgious representations, see the picture in MinutoU, pi. 21, 3), and the eyes notwithstanding in front view ; the shoulders and arms very angular ; the hands also are very often both right or left. 1 230. There was excellent workmanship shown also in articles of terracotta, partly vessels, among which are to be reckoned the so-called canobi, partly small figures of deities, coloured blue and green in enamel, for the most part very 2 powerfully designed, and manufactured in thousands. Even the scarabsei are oftener of burnt earth than stone (amethyst, jasper, agate, cornelian, lapis-lazuli, and various others), although the glyptic art also was early domiciled even in 3 Ethiopia. Works of art in metal were much more rare, and here the Egyptians left the chief inventions to the Greeks, 4 whilst they preceded them in stone sculpture. Painting on TERRACOTTAS, etc. 229 metal was an Egyptian art, at least in later Alexandrian times ; and the fabrication of variegated glass-ware flourished in Alexandria, and probably even among the ancient Egyp tians. Carving on wood was indeed restricted in Egypt by the scarcity of material, yet there were wooden images of gods and men in great numbers, of which we can form some idea from the covers of mummies. 1. Egyptian pots, Descr. ii. pi. 87 sqq. v. pi. 75. Canobus is properly the actual appeUation of a deity (§."220, 3.), the Agathodsemon Knuph who was represented as a pitcher for the filtering of the Nile-water (Suidas «. V.) with a human head. Hence all simUar pots — very different in size and materials — are caUed canobi. The canobi, with four heads (§. 232, 3), along with the mummies, are often fiUed with figures in enamel, often also soUd. There are many such terracotta figures, Descr, v. pi. 67 sqq. Chinese vases in ancient Egyptian tombs, J. F. Davis in the An naU d. Inst. ix. p. 321. [An American, who Uved long in China, assert ed that he immediately recognised to be Chinese, certain vases of this de scription which he saw in the house of the BngUsh consul-general in Egypt. There are several also in the Egyptian coUection at Florence. WUkinson also thinks he has found Chinese smeUing-bottles in Egyptian tombs. Lepsius, according to report, declares this to be a mistake.] 2. The Egyptians used many signet rings. Even sacrifices were sealed by the sphragistes. On the ir(p^xyiieg of the Ethiopians, which they engraved with a sharp stone, Herod, vii, 69. The scarabsei are found along with mummies, on strings on the breast, but more commonly loose between the bandages ; sometimes large, evidently amulets, sometimes smaUer for stringing on threads, in immense number, often with kings' names. Of 1,700 at Turin, there are 172 with the name of Thutmosis. S. Quintino's theory (Lezioni int. a div. argom. d'archeol. vi.) that these latter are smaU coins, is in some measure confirmed by the Ps. Plat. Bryxias, p. 400. Engravings in Descr. v. pi. 79 sqq. Steinbiiohel, Scara- bees Egypt, figures du Musee des Ant. de S. M. I'Bmpereur, Vienna, 1824. BeUermann iiber die Scarabaeen-Gemmen. B. 1820. 21. — Necklaces also, and other ornaments in enamel, are found not unfrequently in mummies. There is an immense quantity of them in public and private coUections in France [Italy, Germany, Holland,] and England. Vases, bottles of gold, silver, glass and other materials, Edinb. New PhUos. Journ. 1838. Apr. Jul. p. 101, from Wilkinson. [WUkinson, Manners and Customs of the anc. Eg. vol. 2. ch. 7, p. 342 sq. 2. ed. On art and works of art generaUy, vol. 3. ch. 10, p. 264 sq.] 3. There appear to be no accounts of brazen statues in Bgypt ; Hero dotus (ii, 172) mentions a golden one. The sacred gifts of gold and sU ver in Diodorus prove nothing as to statues. In coUections from Egypt there are often found smaU bronze figures of gods and sacred animals, wrought with sharpness and precision. The enigmatical figure of Horus t, standing on crocodiles, and crushing together scorpions and wild animals with his hands, is also often to be found in bronzes as weU as in stone and terracotta ; but it always bears the look of being of late origin. Small golden plates with the eye, the urseus, served as amulets. 230 EGYPTIAN ART. 4. As to painting on silver among the Egyptians, Plin. xxxiii. 46. The pitcher which was found in Hungary, in October 1831, near the vil lage of Egyed in the comitat of CEdenburg, corresponds accurately with the vases mentioned by PUny (tingit et .Sgyptus argentum, ut in vasis Anubem suum spectet, etc.). It consists of copper, entirely overlaid with sUver, on which are soldered figures of Egyptian deities and cor responding ornaments of gold thread and smaU plates of silver, while the rest of the ground is entirely coated with a brown red lacker, probably the same which Pliny teaches how to prepare. An imperfect communi cation on the subject by RoseUini, Ann. d, Inst, v, p. 179. M. I. tv, 56; a more accurate one by Jankowich Mikl6st61, v, 'A Magyar Tudos Tac- sas&g Evkonyvei, T. i. p. 354, and the three engravings by which it is accompanied, for the communication of which with accurate imitation of the colours I am indebted to M. Petrowich from Hungary. Hofr. Haus- mann communicated to me the foUowing observations. "The natural combination of silver, copper and sulphur, has quite different proportions to what PUny lays down for the mixture. Herein perhaps lies the differ ence of colour, which in the former, indeed, borders somewhat on the red dish or violet, but is not however brown red. But the method of prepar ing nieUo laid down in Prechtl's Technolog. Bncycl. Bd. 5 corresponds for the most part with Pliny's account, only he does not mention lead. The work on the Isis tablet at Turin does not, from what I observed, entire ly agree with that in the vase of Egyed. The Isis table consists of copper with inlaid sUver work. We distinctly see that the copper is hollowed out and the silver let in. Three rows of figures round about. The out lines given in silver often very fine. I have seen nothing of a lacker." [On Egyptian niello see now Hausmann in the Gott. Anz. 1848. s. 146 — 160 of the Nachrichten. Many of the elegant antique bronze figures in Naples and elsewhere, are finely inlaid with silver.] Of a kindred descrip tion is the tabula Bembina, found at Rome, now at Turin, — an enamel painting on bronze, the outlines inlaid with silver, probably destined for the Roman worship of Isis. In Montfaucon, Caylus Rec. T. vu, Pignori Mensa Isiaca, R. 1605. Lessing's Fragments on the Isiac table. Verm. Gesch, X, 327 ff', Bottiger Archseol, der, Mahlerei s, 36, Oberlin Orbis Ant, p, 267, On works in glass, Boudet sur l'art de la Verrerie ne en Egypte, Mem, T. u. p. 17. Comp. MinutoU, pi. 21. 5. See Herodotus ii, 130 on the concubines of Mycerinus, c. 143. on the 345 high-priests at Thebes in wooden colossi, also c. 182. Wooden flgures in the Osymandeion, representing a judgment according to Diod. The mummy coffins are formed in imitation of the images of Osiris and Isis, often with the faces gilt. Painted figures, also reUefs, in wood, are not rare in museums. AU of sycamore, the high price of which is proved by the careful gluing together of many mummy-cases out of small chips. On works in ivory, Diod. i, 46. I 231. Painting arose from the colouring of statues and re liefs, which practice again was closely connected in Ethiopia 2 with the colouring of living bodies. It does not change its character by transference to a flat surface, whether on walls of hypogea, or upon and in the mummy cases, or immediately on PAINTING. 231 the byssus coverings of the mummies, or in the rolls of papy rus. The colours were bound with glue or wax, and laid on at 3 once upon the stone, the coating of stucco or, in mummy cases, on a thin layer of gypsum, without regard to light or shadow, without mixing or shading. The same simple colouring ma- 4 terials, with some slight regard to the local colours of nature, are invariably applied in the same manner; occasionally a symbolic significance seems at the same time to be aimed at. But everywhere prevails — even when mere pencil-outlines 5 take the place of painting — the precise sharply expressed sys tem of Eygptian design. 1. According to PUn. xxxiii, 36, the nobles and the gods were among the Ethiopians painted with minium ; according to Herodotus vii, 69, the Ethiopian warriors were painted half with gypsum and half with minium. 2. The walls of the hypogea are adorned with pictures enclosed in a frame-like manner; as to their style and subjects, see §. 233, 4. The wooden sheaths or chests of the mummies are painted and written with religious subjects, and contain a ritual for the dead, like the rolls of papyrus on other occasions. (Hence where there are wooden cases on mummies there are no papyri.) The most complete representation is given by Guigniaut Rel. de PAnt. pi. 45. MinutoU, tf 36. 37. Inside the case there is often found beneath the mummy a figure as large as Ufe, which in later mummies of the Roman period looks very lik« a Byzantine picture. CaiUiaud ii. pi. 66 sqq. Mummy of Pet-Mant-Ich-Mes in the Jersey Museum, Pettegrew Archseol. Brit, xxvii, p. 263. — Minute descrip tions of the painted mummy covers and cases at Munich are given by Wagen, Denkschriften der Miinchner Acad. 1820. The latest style of painting on mummy-covers is shown on the Dresden mummies which are interesting on that account (Bekker August. T. i). Encaustic painting of the Egyptians according to RoseUini II, ii. Painted mummy-rolls particularly in Denon, pi. 136 sqq., Descr. v. pi. 44 sqq. Mai Catal. (§. 216, 3), Cadet Copie figuree d'un rouleau de papyrus tr. k Thfebes dans les tomb, des Rois 1806. 4. Men reddish (a peculiar flesh-colour), women yeUowish; quad rupeds generally red, birds for the most part green or blue, in like man ner water, hence also Ammon. Blue was obtained by copper- and brown by iron-oxide. Costaz sur la Peinture des Egyptiens, Mem. T. iii. p. 134. Bottiger Archseol. der Mahl. s. 25 — 100. Creuzer Commentationes Herodotese, p. 385. John, BeUagen zu MinutoU's Reisen 3. 4. 5. Minu toU's Abhandlungen verm. Inhalts, zweiter Cyclus, i. s. 49. Baillif and Merimfe in Passalacqua's Catalogue, p. 242. 258. B. SUBJECTS. 232. The fundamental idea clearly resulting from the new ] discoveries as to the significance of Egyptian works of art, and which mu,st henceforward be adhered to as the basis, is 232 EGYPTIAN ART. this: the Egyptians were completely without the Greek repre sentative impulse which constrains to represent what inwardly fills and agitates the soul, because it is beautiful and exalting. [§. 233, 6.] Their representation is invariably guided by ex ternal aims ; it seeks to authenticate particular events, actions, services ; it is altogether of an historical, monumental nature, as it were, an embodied inscription. Writing and image are here, so to speak, still unsevered and concrete ; hence also the work of art is almost always accompanied by hieroglyphic characters, the import of which is only carried out and pre sented bodily to the view on a larger scale. The gods are not exhibited by themselves, but only in relation to their festival ; hence there are no purely mythological scenes; the design is always to declare the acts of homage which the deity received r in a certain modification or situation. All religious scenes of Egyptian art are definite acts of homage by particular indi viduals, commemorative monuments of the services performed to the deity. Here countless varieties of ofl'erings and modes ¦ of testifying piety are scrupulously distinguished. In like manner life in the infernal world is constantly represented as the destiny of a particular person, as the judgment upon him i by the- tribunal of the dead. In fine, the presumed purely scientific representation of the heavens degenerated in later times into horoscopes of individuals. 3. On representations from Egyptian religion and worship, Hirt iiber die Bildung der .ffigyptischen Gottheiten 1821 (from Grecian accounts). ChampoUion's Pantheon Egyptien (from hieroglyphic and other inscrip tions). Plates to Creuzer's Symbolik, especiaUy to Guigniaut's edition of it (ReUgions de I'Antiquite, Planches, i. cab.). [K. Schwenk, die Mythol. der .iEgypter mit 13 lithogr. Tafeln 1846, discussed with pene trating acumen and great mythological insight.] The coins of the Nomi, which extend from Trajan down to M. Aurelius as Caesar, are an impor tant source of Egyptian symbolism, and are also interesting on account of pecuUar combinations. See Zoega Numi Mg. Imper. R. 1786. Tochon d'Annecy Rech, sur les Med. des Nomes de I'Bgypte. P. 1822. 4. Descr. v. pi. 58. The foUowing seem to be undoubted personages of Egyptian artistic mythology : A. AMOKQ THE GODS. I. Phthas, the inscription in phonetic hieroplyphs Ptah, in close- fltting dress, with the feet joined together, leaning on the platform con sisting of four steps (which is caUed rd rirrx^x ^spiiXix, and perhaps de notes the four elements, Reuvens Lettres h, Mr. Letronne, i. p. 28 sq.). Also dwarfish and ithyphallic as in the temple at Memphis, comp. Tolken in MinutoU s. 426. Likewise with a scarabseus as a head, inscription Ptah-Tore {<^a^ei, Reuvens, ibid. p. 14). Cynocephalus, the ape, his sym bol. II. Ammon, inscription Amn, with a ram's or a human head, and a double variegated feather upon it, artificial beard and the sceptre. Mo- SUBJECTS. 233 difications 1. IthyphaUic, brandishing the scourge, with close feet, the in scription Amn, is held to be the Pan-Mbndes of Chemmis, who has not yet been discovered in his goat form mentioned by Herodotus. 2. As Am- mon-Chnubis or Knuphis (comp. T61ken in MinutoU s. 374). Inscription Nef, Nuf (with gutteral n, therefore in Greek Kvov(pig, but in composition liersvvov(pig), with goat's homs. Also in form of a serpent, called by the Greeks Agathodsemon. As a Nile-pitcher in Canobus §, 230, 1, 3, United with the sun as Amonra, Amonrasonter, III. The Sttn-god called Re, Phre, with the head of a hawk {ie^xxoft,o^(pog HorapoUo) with the sun's disc, upon it an urseus, Mandu seems to be a kindred deity, — MxviovXig on an inscription at Talmis; — his image is often scratched out, IV, Thoyt, the ibis-headed, represented as grammateus among the gods. Also hawk-headed according to ChampoUion, as Hermes-Trismegistus, his em blem the winged discus (Tat), V, Soohus or Suchus, Souk, with croco- dUe head ; also denoted by a crocodile with taU curled round, on coins of the nomos of Omboi. Zoega 10. Tochon d'Ann. p. 130. VI, The moon- god. Pooh or Pioh (p is the article) with close feet, one lock of hair, the crescent moon. Also as a hermaphrodite, impregnating the air. VII. OsiBis, Ousri, in human shape with crook and scourge (see Macrob. Sat. i. 23) recognizable especiaUy by his high hat. The eye a chief symbol. VIII. Aroeris, Horus, Harpocrates, Arori, often as a boy, with a single lock of hair, suckled by Isis, sitting on a lotus. Also hawk-headed. The hawk as a suckUng of Isis is seen on a basalt torso in the Borgia coUection, fuU of interesting, but in the highest degree fantastic and monstrous conceptions. IX. Anubis, Anbo, with the head of the wild dog (jackaU). X. Bebon, Babys or Seth (commonly Typhon), with the body of a hippopotamus, the head of a crocodile, and a sword in his hands. As the constellation of the Great Bear in the zodiac of Tentyra. B. GODDESSES. I. Neith, denoted by the vulture. With human head or that of a vulture or Uon (then with the inscription Tafnet). Also as a herma phrodite according to HorapoUo. Comp. W. von Humboldt in the Schriften der Berl. Acad. 1826. s. 145. II. Athor (A^^olim), the goddess of Tentyra, also at Philse, with the head of a cow, but also as human with a vulture as head ornament. Her hieroglyphic name, a hawk in a square. III. Isis, human, with cow horns and a discus between them, often diffi cult to distinguish from Athor. The figure with the feather, which ChampoUion formerly caUed Hera-Sate, is now considered by him as weU as Tolken to be Aletheia or Truth (at Egyptian judgments on the dead). — The four genii of Amenthes, the human-, the jackal-, the ape-, and the hawk-headed often stand together in mummy-like forms, or as canobi. 4. The foUowing are frequent scenes from the worship: Sacrifices, the animal dismembered ; legs of animals, fowls with fruits and flowers laid upon the sacrificial table ; censers held out in artificial hands ; en tire trains of animals brought by the king as sacrifice to the gods. Hi erogl. pi. 61. Adorations of gods and sacred animals (for example, a sacred cow, MinutoU, Tf 30, 2). Consecrations of Pharaohs by sprinkling with sacred water, by placing sacred hats upon them. Processions (such as Appuleius Met. xi. describes them), in which the god is also carried about (vehitur ferculo, Macrob, Sat, i, 23), in a small tempio (Trxarog, vaog 234 EGYPTIAN ART. X^vaoiig), such as were even brought in late times from Philae to Nubia (Letronne, Christ, en Egypte, p. 77). EspeciaUy the great procession or xapi.xi!ix with the ship of Ammon across to the Memnonia on the Libyan side (Peyron, Mem. di Torino xxxi. p. 48). See the relief of Carnac, Descr. iu. pi. 32. 33, comp. that of Philse, i. pi. 11. MinutoU, Tf 20, ^orex'"'f 'r'!'' dXti^eixv dTropiipcovptevx. Comp. Hezekiel 4, 1. also the painted Chaldeans with particoloured coats and hats, Hezekiel 13, 14, were works of this sort. We stiU find at Babylon bricks with cuneiform characters on the under, and figures of animals stamped on the fore-side. 2, See Herodot, i, 183, on the image of Belus, with table, throne and footstool of gold (800 talents), and another golden statue 12 cubits high, but which the historian did not see, Diodorus (ii, 9) is more fabulous on the golden, embossed images of Zeus, Hera and Rhea ; therewith a sceptre composed of precious stones, axiivr^ov T^i^oxoTAmrov. (Thus MUto dedicated in Asia, besides a golden Venus-Mylitta, a •TceXiidg T^i^oxo'KXrrrog, jEUan V, H. xu, 1.) On the making of images, particularly the Epistle of Jeremias i, 7 : y'huoax yd^ xvrav 'eurl xxre%vaptivr\ vtto rexrovog (Berosus' lingua inaurata at Athens, PUn. vu, 37), xird Se ire^ix^vox xxi we^ix^yv^x — xxi atj'Tre^ irx^^iva i^ihoxoafxa 'Kxpt.^xvovreg p^^yo-Zof xxrxaxevx^ovat ure- (Pavovg £7ri rdg xej {xxi ?) P(;gU(70;^oof ^aveiitrxg ;(;^vo-/oi/ Te^tex^vaairsv xvrov — ^vXov yd^ xaYiTrov ixXiyerxi rixrav x. r. 7i., also 44, 13 sqq. where the work of the tIxtwk is described by a Une and a compass, with which he produces " a beautiful figure of a man." The golden calf Ukewise (ac cording to MichaeUs) and the cherubim of the holy of holies were of wood, overlaid with plates of gold. — A gilt ApoUo in a chapel of' beaten gold at Carthage, Appian Pun. 127. A taste for the composition of metals may be gathered especiaUy from Daniel 2, 31. Comp. Sickler, Mythus des jUsculapius. 1819. Zweiter Anhang. 3. The brazen columns of the temple and the vessels were, according to the first book of Kings 7, 46, cast in thick earth ; that is, perhaps, in thick earthen moulds. Comp. De Wette Archseol. §. 106. 4. A great variety of vessels in the temple at Jerusalem, especiaUy the molten sea borne by twelve oxen. We may here mention by the way the gigantic oval vessel of stone, 30 feet in circumference, with four han dles and an ox as ornament, which lies near Amathus (Lemisso) in Cyprus. J. Landseer, Sabsean Researches, p. 81. Punic shields of gold and silver with figures, Liv. xxv, 24. Plin. xxxv, 4. Comp. above §. 58. 1. 5. Hiram, Kings 1st Book, 7, merely an artist in brass, knew, accord ing to ParaUp. u, 2, 14, how to work iv x^'"''"i' ""' '^^ x^'^'^V "¦"¦' '" ai^ii^a xxi iv T^i^oig xxi ^v'Koig x.xl virov, Strab. XV. p. 728. In Schus, probably Susa, there is also nothing found at the present day but heaps of bricks sometimes painted. Kinneir, Geogr. Memoir of the Persian Empire, p. 100 sq. Porter ii. p. 410. Hoeck, Vet. Medise et Persise Monum. 1 244. The ancient hereditary seat of the Persian sovereigns was in Pasargadse, a river plain in central Persis, — which even received its name according to Herodotus from the first 2 and regal tribe of the people. This district, thereby rendered sacred, the metropolis as it were, from which proceeded the wide-ruling kingly race, received in the flourishing period of the Persian empire a long series of edifices, and among these an older royal seat (agj^a/a jSaaiXna), with the tomb of Cyrus, and a newer residence which the Greeks called Persepolis, whilst to the former they gave by way of eminence the name 3 of Pasargadffl. This newer king's palace is recognised with 4 certainty in the ruins of Chilminar or Tacht Djemshid. The material — ^the hard dark grey marble of the hill of Rachmed, on the slope of which this royal citadel was erected by the aid of powerful substructions — has here prevented the de struction of the architectural forms ; although, indeed, only the walls and pillars were of stone, all the beams and roof- work having doubtless been of overlaid cedar, a circumstance which accounts for the extraordinary slenderness of the 5 columns. The structure rises in the form of terraces; strong gates, large courts with side buildings and magnificent porti coes, led to the innermost chambers of the palace which were 6 placed highest. The details of the architecture manifest a style of art furnished with an abundant store of decorative forms, but not particularly skilful in managing them. We recognise the members and ornaments of the Ionic order, which was probably diff'used in Asia at an early period (§. 54), but they are deprived of their charms by overloading and odd combinations, 2, See the writers on Alexander, who were the first to notice Perse polis, especially Arrian vi, 29 sqq, Strab, xv, 729, Diod, xvii, 71, Cur tius V, 7, Pasargada3 probably comprehended the buildings at Murghab and Nakshi-Rustan, §. 245, 3, See the engravings in the Travels of Chardin (repubUshed with additions by Langles, P, 1812), Kampfer, and Cornells de Bruyn ; more accurate in C, Niebuhr's Reise nach Arabien ii, s, 121, Morier's Journey through Persia i. p. 129—137. Second Journey, p. 76. Ousely, Travels in various Countries of the Bast ii. pi. 40 sqq. Porter i. p. 580 sqq. Edward Alexander, Travels to India, pi. 10. Buckingham's Travels in Assyria, Media and Persia, ch. 17. Caylus, Hist, de I'Ac. d. I. xxix. p. 118. Herder: PersepoUs eine Muthmassung. PersepoUtanische Briefe. Heeren Ideen i. s. 194. Mongez, Mem. de I'Inst. nation. Litt. iii. p. 212. ARCHITECTURE OF THE MBDES AND PERSIANS. 251 Hirt in the Abhandl. der BerUner Acad. 1820. s, 40, [Voy. en Perse de M, Flandin, peintre, et de M. Coste, architecte. P, 1845, The drawings are after Steuart, who lived many years in Persia, remarkably true in character,] 5. A broad double stair led to three gates adjoining one another ; these to the double pUlars with the colossal haut-reliefs of imaginary ani mals. A second flight was then ascended to the palace strictly so-called. Three porticoes surrounded a larger one without separation by walls; it is probable they were only divided by tapestries (Esther i, 6) which were suspended along the columns, as in Alexander's state-tent (Jilian V. H. ix, 3) and the Dionysian tent of Ptolemy the Second (§, 150, 2), The inner rooms and chambers now Ue apart from these, on the highest terrace; here also columns in the chief apartment. These chambers, however, certainly formed at one time a connected buUding with those porticoes. Lower subordinate erections, among them one tolerably ex tensive. Extent of the whole 1400 X 900 feet. The impression which the entire edifice must have made is best conveyed in the admirable descrip tion of a Persian residence in Appuleius De Mundo, p. 270. Bip, (Ps. Aristot. De Mundo, o. 6) ; especially the foUowing portion : (Rex) cir- cumseptus admirabUi regia, cujus tecta fulgerent eboris nive, argenti (§. 243) luce, flammea auri vel electri claritate : Umina vero alia prse aUis erant, interiores fores, exteriores januse muniebant portseque ferratse et muri adamantina firmitate. 6. The columns (see particularly Porter, pi. 45) of the grand portico 55 feet high, about 4 feet thick'at the bottom, with Ionic fiutings and high bases of a pecuUar form ; the capitals sometimes composed of the fore parts of unicorns, sometimes of a great variety of oddly combined ingre dients (an inverted crater, another placed upright upon it, and on that again a high abacus with two rows of scroUs at the four sides). Be sides, ornaments of foUage, roses, volutes, and astragals. On the king's sepidchre also appear the dentels, a sort of ovolo with serpent-tongues and the architrave with three fascise. The cornices over the doors bear some resemblance to those of Egyptian architecture (§, 222), The square blocks and the portions of the columns are wrought and fitted together in a manner that excites admiration. There are traces of water-conduits through the porticoes and apartments. Chardin and Morier mention enigmatical subterranean passages. 245. The sepulchral monuments also of the Achjemenidse 1 were in this ancient seat of the race. These were rarely 2 buildings standing apart like that of Cyrus ; more commonly 3 they consisted of fa§ades hewn out of the rocks, with secret and inaccessible chambers behind, such as are to be found partly on the wall of rock above the palace of Persepolis already described, and partly northward from it at Nakshi- Rustan. The architecture presents the same forms as at Per- 4 sepolis; the prevailing representation is that of a stage upon which the king appears, engaged in some religious rite, above a frieze and architrave which are supported by columns with unicorn capitals. 252 ART OF THE ARIAN RACE. 2. The tomb of Cyrus in the paradeisos of Pasargadas, Arrian, vi, 29. Strabo xv, 730. [m^yog oii pciyxg, »«tm piiv are^eog, xva le areynv exav xxi unxov arivriv rt\eag ep,;oi/Ta rriv e'iaolov.'] A Ttv^yog ; beneath, a basement of square blocks, on it a building of one or more stories, above, a anx6g with a very narrow door; within, a golden coffin with the corpse, a sopha with ¦xileg x^vaoi ffipu^^xaTo;, on it a cover of Babylonian tapestry, garments, ornaments, and weapons. Whether the monument is at Murghab'! Ousely u. pi. 53. Porter i. pi. 14. p. 498. Heeren, s. 276. [Lassen has proved in his Zeitschr. St. vi. that the tomb at Murghab belonged to the younger Cyrus.] 3. One of the tombs on Mount Rachmed (400 feet from the palace properly so caUed) must be that of Darius, according to Diodorus xvii, 71 (comp. Ctesias Pers. 15), with which Grotefend's deciphering of the cuneiform inscriptions of Persepolis perfectly agrees. Chardin, pi, 67, 68,— Nakshi-Rustan, ibid, pi, 74. Ousely u, pi, 41, Porter, pi, 17, Se pulchres corresponding pretty weU with those of Persepolis have been found in Media, at Bisutun and Hamadan, 2, PLASTIC ART. [245.* Assyrian art will be known in future through the discoveries at Nineveh by Botta, the French consul at Mossul, The principal figure in most of the reliefs is a king or hero, in richly bordered tunic with upper garment and a tiara, who is either fighting, or driving his enemies before him, or receiving captives and suppliants, or sitting at a ban quet, or in festal procession guiding a chariot with four horses yoked abreast. Near him a beardless man, probably a eu nuch, frequently with a club, Ainong the numerous figures of combatants, there is repeatedly seen a shield-bearer, under whose protection another bends his bow, or hurls his javelin. A figure, probably that of a god, holds in his right hand a crooked serpent-formed weapon, and with the left draws a lion towards himself There are no female figures except one holding aloft a child in her arms. Six bulls 1 6 feet high, with human countenances, were at first discovered, and afterwards 120 more, all in alto rilievo. One sculpture represents four nobles, sitting on chairs, and eunuchs pouring out to them; these draw out of a vase with a rhyton having a lion's head : several represent sieges. The prevailing principle is faithful imitation of nature and life, with a moderate use of symbolic, especially winged figures. The merit of the design in the bodies, especially of the lion and bull, as well as in the fea tures of the human countenance, and in the execution of the hair, is much praised. The excavations were not made in the circuit of the old city, or as is now supposed, of the ofiicial residence of the kings near Mossul beyond SCULPTURES OP NINEVEH AND PERSEPOLIS. 253 the Tigris, but five caravan leagues distant therefrom (of which length therefore was the city), where stands the small village of Khorsabad on a hill 100 feet high, about 300 metres in length and 150 in breadth. There were 15 large haUs opened in this hill, one of them 120 feet long, almost everywhere covered, as were also the four fajades, with reUefs and cunei form characters, in a " kind of transparent marble," partly on " slabs of alabaster," or " in an easily softened plaster." Lettres de M. Botta sur ses decouvertes k Khorsabad prfes de Ninive publiees par M. J. Mohl. P. 1845, printed from Journal Asiat. from May 1843 till Febr. 1846, with 55 engravings, 33 of them containing sculptures. Among these, plate 22 shows portions ornamented with colours, the hair of the head and beard brown, and the tiara and fillet red ; in plate 30 also there are red sandal- ties; it is said that blue occurs frequently. PI. 17 a biga, the king therein, over whom a parasol is held, behind him a horseman with lance and quiver, like pi. 19. PI. 26 a siege ; pi. 21 a helmeted head, very na tural and full of expression. The (pxXxQx of the horses are overloaded, clumsy. PI. 38 and 50 a male winged figure with eagle's head, the hand clutching. A certain agreement with the statues of .lEgina is explained from the principle itself, especially as regards attitude, the crisped hair, and the close-fitting drapery, for example, the archer pi. 2, where also the shield covering the archer recals by its five surrounding circles of or naments, the Homeric and Hesiodic shield compositions which are so na tural in the arrangement. We may also compare the architrave reliefs of Assos, §. 256. R. 2. the old sepulchral monument of Xanthos, §. 90.* and above aU the sculptures of Persepolis. It will gradually be ascertained more clearly in how far Greek art received impulses, and took occasions in Asia Minor directly from Assyria and Media, and how freely and inde pendently at the same time her internal, the truly artistic, development resulted. Great masses of monuments from Nineveh have already been brought to Paris. The pubUcation of a work containing 405 plates and 100 sheets of letterpress, in 90 monthly parts, was commenced in Nov. 1846 ; the designs by the painter Eugene Flandin, who has been long in Persia. The copies of the cuneiform inscriptions occupy a length of 2,500 metres. Kiepert in Schmidt's Jahrb, f. Gesch, 1844, i, s. 95, seems to think that these sculptures do not belong to early Assyrian art, but may be derived from a later Persian era, as Xenophon mentions jixci'kiix at Nineveh, although the ancient city lay in ruins since the Median con quest, Leo supposes that the Assyrian kingdom did not terminate with the death of Sardanapalus (890), after Babylon had now become the seat of government, but continued to exist under kings of its own, Lehrb, der Universalgesch, i. s. 118, The inscriptions wUl come to our help,] 246, These ruins of Persepolis exhibit abundance of sculp- I ture combined with architecture. Fantastic animals, of a 2 symbolical nature, stand at the entrance in mezzo rilievo, as the royal arms; and such are also often employed for architectonic purposes. Groups, in which a mythological hero 3 transfixes a monster of this description, are placed in relief on the gates of the side-building. We see, on different walls 4 and pillars, the king with his attendants in procession ; his throne, which is covered by a canopy, borne by the represen- 254 ART OF THE ARIAN RACE, tatives of the chief tribes of the empire; and the prince who ' is seated thereon as a judge. The body-guard of the prince, his courtiers in two diflferent regularly alternating costumes, — the Median stole and the candys, — and, the most interest ing representation of all, the provinces bringing the annual presents {bSioa) adorn the grand staircase which leads up to the great portico. 2. The unicorn with or without wings, the enigmatical animal with human head adorned as a king's (Martichoras' 1 Kaiomort's ?) the griffin and the lion are the principal figures, [Pel. Lajard Rech, sur le culte, les symboles, les attributs et les mon, fig, de Venus en Orient et en Occi dent 1, 2 Uvr, P. 1837 fol, interrupted.] 3. It is in favour of the theory which regards this hero as Achsemenes (Djemshid?) the ancestral hero of the race estabUshed here, that, accord ing to .^Uan H. A. xii, 21, Achsemenes was actuaUy a wonderful legen dary personage, the nursUng of an eagle, in like manner as in Firdusi the bird Simurg rears young heroes. 6. This double costume is easily distinguished throughout. The more splendid one, which the king himself wears, is the Median garb, to which the Magian stola bore a resemblance (see Lucian, Nekuom. 8). To the other dress belongs the upper coat with empty sleeves or xoqxi (Colchian, Amazonian, Hungarian costume, see Amalthea i. s. 169. ii. s. xii), this is the Persian Kandys {x'rdv ov ipi.'Troqivovvrxi, (fibuUs annectunt, oi nrqxna- rxi, Hesych. PoUux vii. 68). On the Persian costumes, comp. Voss Myth. Briefe iii. s. 367. Mongez sur les Costumes des Perses, M6m. de I'Inst. nat, Litt. iv, p. 22 sq, Xenoph. Cyrop, 1. 3, 2, says : rxvrx icxvrx (wigs and rouge,) M.-/^ixx ian, xxi oi 'jcaofiv^oi xiraveg xxi oi xxviveg xxi oi (rr^e'irroi •jtre^i rri Sijjj xxi rx ipi'KXix 'ireqi rxiv x^^oiv iv Yiiqaxig Ss roig oi'xoi xxi vvv en ¦no'kii xxi ia^iireg cpxvXore^xi xxi ilxirxi etjriTiiare^xi. The tiara with the side ribbons {-Trx^xyvxiiiieg, Strabo xv. p. 734, fila tiarse Ammian xxx, 8), the Kidaris and Kyrbasia are difiScult to distinguish from one another, comp. NiccoUni M. Borb. viii. p. 17 sqq., also Demetr. De elocutione 161. The whip or scourge, which is plainly to be seen in many figures of war riors hanging on the back behind the quiver, indicates the Persian mas- tigophori. — For the statistic explanation of the provinces I refer entirely to Heeren, Ideen ii, 1. s. 213 ff. 247. Nowhere does the formative art appear restricted in its subjects to so narrow a circle as here. The deity, the pure Ormuzd, originally unrepresentable, is only indicated as an ob ject of the king's adoration by a half figure floating aloft, and terminating below in wings; besides this nothing belongs to mythology except the symbolic animals; all else pertains to the historical present. Strict propriety, stiff" ceremoniousness demand throughout careful draping and solemn movement; even a battle with monsters does not disturb either ; the entire absence of women has the same cause. In the over minutely executed hair-dress {xo/mi T^od^eroi), the regular folds, the traces of gold chains and ornaments having been fixed on the SCULPTURES OP PERSIA AND MEDIA, 255 wrists, the neck, and the tiara of the king, — in everything we recognise the influence of courtly pomp, and the force of an external law. Art, however, nowhere presents itself as a rude 4 attempt ; the design on the contrary has a fixed, precise style ; the forms of the countenance together with the stamp of na tionality bear the impress of dignity ; in the representation of the provinces there is a delicate perception of character, in that of the courtiers agreeable alternations in attitude and gesture ; the animal figures are designed with peculiar power and grandeur; the workmanship also in the hard stone is 5 extremely neat, the treatment of the reliefs peculiar; so that 6 even although Egyptian as well as Grecian artists wrought for the great king, yet we must recognise in these works a native style of art Avhich ripened through a long course of years, and which doubtless had come to the Persians from Ecbatana in Media, and to the Medes, as we imagine, in the main from Babylon. 3, 'O fiiyxg (ixuiXevg — xopAx. Aristoph, Plut, 171, \_x6pixi -Tr^oa^eroi, false hair, perukes, which the Greeks of the strictly aristocratic times probably borrowed from thence,] The Persians preferred the eagle nose, because Cyrus wa| y^vmg. Plut, reip, ger, prsec. 28. 6. The relief rises graduaUy in a delicate Une from the ground, quite . differently from the Greek and Egyptian reUefs. Fragments in the British Museum (R, vi, no. 100 — 103) and in the possession of Sir Gore Ousely; accurate drawings in Morier's Second Journey, pi. 1. Ousely ii. pi. 43 — 46, and Ker Porter. [One of the most minute drawings, Archseol. Britann. xiv. p. 283, head of a bUnd man with a fillet round the head, and beard curled, as in the so-caUed Indian Bacchus — Ammian Marc. xxiv. 6. the Persians had faUen somewhat behind in the formative arts because they only made battle pieces.] 6. Diodorus (i, 46) speaks of the Persian artists who wrought for the Persian kings. On Telephanes' (§. 112, 1) works for the Persians, Plin. xxxiv, 19, 9. 248. The great extent also over which this style is found, 1 not only in Persia, but in Media, agrees with this supposition. The reliefs of Bisutun (Bagistanon), between Ecbatana and 2 the Tigris, which among other subjects represent a king as vic torious over his enemies, exhibit this style perhaps at an ear lier date than those of Persepolis; the ancients seem to have seen here works of Semiramis. It is probable that the con- 3 siderable ruins of the Armenian city Van will likewise yield not merely inscriptions but architectural forms similar in kind to the Persepolitan. Moreover, the Babylono-Median cylin- 4 ders approximate to this style of art, although often carelessly and badly wrought ; a portion of them have been rightly and with certainty interpreted from the Persian rites and creed ; many also belong to a combination of Magian and Chaldean 5 266 ART OF THE ARIAN RACE, 6 faith. We have still to mention the dariks in which the re presentation — the king himself as an archer — as well as the design closely correspond with the monuments of Persepolis. 7 In the times of the Arsacidse a Greek taste inherited from the Macedonian conquerors prevailed at the court ; with the ex ception of coins, however, nothing certain has been preserved ; 8 the Sassanidse, in many respects restorers of ancestral customs and religion, exhibit in their works of art a turgid and taste less style, derived from later Roman art and applied to orien tal costume, 1, Ruins in the Persepolitan style on the Persian gulph, Morier i. p, 51. On Ecbatana, above §. 243. On Bisutun, especially Porter ii. p, 154, pi, 60, Comp, Hist, de I'Ac, des Inscr, xxvii, p, 159. Hoeck, p, 22, 29, 73 sqq. 2, The identity of Bagistanon, in Diodorus ii, 13, and Baptana in Isidore, with Bisutun, I consider with Hoeck, p, 116, Mannert v, 2, s. 165. and others to be evident. The representation of Semiramis with 100 sa traps reminds one very much of Persepolitan art. The Syrian letters in Diodorus are probably Assyrian ; but these' Aaov^ix y^xfiptxrx, the Royal Persian characters especiaUy for monuments, may have been merely cuneiform characters. [The monument at Behistun, on the road to Bag dad and Hamadan, has become better known by the drawings and ex planations of Major RawUnson, Journ, of the R, Asiatic Society, vol, x, P. 1, L, 1846, It represents in a style Uke the PersepoUtan, Darius Hystaspis, opposite to whom stand the different rebels who revolted throughout Upper Asia during the first years of his reign, and is ex plained by numerous cuneiform characters, in agreement with an allu.- sion of Herodotus, Further on works of the Sassanid period,] 3, Van is called Schamiramakert, Semiramocerta, in Armenian au thors, who speak of columns, statues, and grottoes there, St, Martin, Notice sur le Voy, Litt, en Orient de M, Schulz, Journ, des Sav. 1828, p, 451, Grotefend in Seebode's Krit, Bibliothek 1829. Bd. i. no. 30, Kunstblatt 1829, N. 32. The cuneiform inscriptions give the name of Xerxes according to Grotefend's method of decyphering adopted by St. Martin; notwithstanding this, however, the Persian kings may have also found here ancient Semiramidan works (that is works of the Assy rian dynasties generaUy). Burnouf finds ahura mazda, Ormuzd, extrait d'un mem, sur deux inscr, cun6iformes trouvfies prfes d'Hamadan, Journ, des Sav. 1836. p, 283, 321. 4. See especially Grotefend's explanations, Amalthea i, s, 93, ii, s, 65, 5. Magians appeared early at Babylon and Chaldeans in Persia ; and even in Berosus Chaldseism and Magism appear so mixed up together that the Babylonian Kronos (El) is put for Zeruane and caUed the father of Aramazdes. Probably the Babylonian cylinder in Porter ii, pi. 80. n. 1. which represents Ormuzd on high, and beneath him three figures, of which two are evidently of divine nature, is also Perso-Chaldsean ; one of them carries a hatchet (like Zeus Labrandeus in Caria, and Sandon in Lydia), and stands upon a unicorn ; it has a moon above it, and the one REMAINS OF PERSIAN AND MEDIAN ART. 257 opposite bas a star. — The combination of Persian and Egyptian symbols, [like that of the Roman and Gallic,] which is seen in tho cylinder treated of in Amalth. i. s. 93, is also observable on the stone found at Susa, which contains a sort of Persian hieroglyphics (Walpole, Trav. p. 420, &c.), and the four-winged man with Egyptian head-dress at Murghab, Porter i. pi. 13, Rhodogune with streaming hair according to a beautiful legend, the Persian imperial seal, Polysen. vui, 27. Persepolitan fragments in Bgypt, Descr. de I'Eg. v. pi. 29. 6. On the Dariks, Eckhel D. N. i, ui. 551 sqq. Good impressions in Landon, Numism. i, 2. Mionnet, Descr. pi. 36, 1. Suppl. viii, pi, 19, very interesting. [Mr. Lajard possesses the richest collection of Persian en graved stones that has ever been made in Europe, Journ. des Sav, 1819, p, 424,] 7, The Arsacid^, although according to Lucian De Dome 5, ov (pihit- xx\oi, Ustened, as we know, to Greek poems at their court ; and as to their coins the earUer ones in particular approach closely to those of Ma cedonia. It appears to me also that Eckhel i, iu, p, 549, is not right in denying to the Arsacidse the tetradrachmse with Greek allegorical figures. There is very little known of sculptures, Hoeck, p. 141. On a gem with the image of Pacorus, Plin. Ep. x. 16. Gems of this kind still exist, Tassie, pi. 12, 673—677. 8. The same clumsy and turgid character prevails in the coins of the Sassanidse and the sculptures of Nakshi-Rustan (Sapor I.), Shapur (Valerian's conquest) and Takt-Bostan (Sapor IL, IIL). See on these Hoeck, p. 47. 126 sq., and the exceUent engravings in Porter, pi. 19 sq. 62 sqq. Fine helmet in A. d'Olenine sur le costume et les armes des gladiateurs, Petersb. 1835. pi. 15. ibid. pi. 14, an enchased silver goblet, which the author supposes to be Sassanidan, a horseman shooting a lion backwards ; the style indicates a higher antiquity. [Large silver goblet of the Duo de Luynes with a chase, M. d. I. iii, 51. Ann. xv. p. 98. A, de Longperier.] Here the allegorical figures are often quite the same as those of later Roman art ; in other respects there is most labour bestowed on the costumes and ornaments. The balls on the heads of the kings are globes with the zodiac, which is often distinctly to be seen on coins, and represent them as governors of the world. On the coins of the Arsacidse Tychsen in the Commentat. Soc. Gott. rec. V. i. ; on those of the Sas sanidse V, ii,^ — Mani, a heretic who arose out of the revival of magism and presented his doctrine in a sensible form (under Shapur I, and Hormisdas I,) by means of an iUuminated evangelium. IV, THE INDIANS. 249. The Indian nation, the most eastern member of the Caucasian race, which seems here very much blended, were a people of great intellectual endowments, which they displayed in a refined cultivation of language, a very ancient speculative theology and a fanciful style of poetry; but nevertheless they were ill-adapted for the cultivation of the formative arts in R 268 INDIAN ART. 2 an original manner. The calm contemplativeness of earlier and the glowing riotous fancy of later times found in the domain of natural forms no expression, in the systematic de- 3 velopment of which they could rest satisfied; and although the hierarchical system, and the great endurance of Indian workmen achieved much that is worthy of admiration, in the excavation of grotto temples and the hewing out_ of entire mountains, yet we miss altogether the directing mind which could, without a model, have employed and controlled this industry and expenditure of force for architectonic purposes. 4 On the contrary, we here see art roaming about with incon stancy amid an abundance of forms, and if it almost by acci dent lights on the simple and grand, is incapable of using and carrying it out as an established and recurring form of 5 art; so that it is difficult to get rid of the idea that the architectonic and plastic sense in India was only awakened by impulses and communications of various kinds from with out (probably from the Greeks or Javanas), and that a nou rishment was presented to it, which however it could not rightly digest; for the contrast between the classic elegance of individual decorative members, and the barbarous want of taste in the combination of these with architectonic wholes, can only perhaps be thereby explained in a satisfactory man ner. 3, Cavern temples of Siwah in Elephanta not far from Bombay. Several in Salsette, the largest at Kenneri. Grotto at Carli. The enor mous pantheon at BUora in the Ghaut mountains, destined at the same time for the reception of a hundred thousand pilgrims. Buddhistic grot toes at Berar, near Adshunta and Bang, of simple but heavy forms of architecture, without ornaments, but with paintings on stucco. Cavern- temples of Radshasthan, which are said to be nearer the Greek style. Mahamalaipur (MahabaUpur in the Mahabarata, Maliarpha in Ptolemy), a rocky mountain on the coast of Ooromandel converted into a labyrinth of monuments. Pyramidal pagodas at Deogur (Tagara, a leading fair at the time of the Peripl. Mar. Ind,), and Ramiseram. A rock temple in Ceylon. On the rock chambers of Bamian (Alexandria at the foot of Mount Caucasus, according to Ritter) Hoeck Monum. Vet. Med. p, 176 sqq. 4, The grotto of CarU and the temple of Visvakurma at BUora for example, 'where the roofs are hewn out into circular vaults, produce a grand effect. As regards the detaUs, the foUowing form of piUar is of most frequent occurrence and most regularly formed : a base of several plinths and cymas, on these a short piUar with Ionic flutings, then an inverted acanthus capital, contracted above, on this contracted neck a large torus, and above that the abacus with prolongations in the direc tion of the main-beam over them, which supports the roof Inverted antefixa or corner-ornaments of ancient sarcophagi are frequently to be found as decorations of piUars, The thickness of these supports (in the form of which, however, there is no trace of refiection on static laws CAVERN TEMPLES, 259 observable) is only the work of necessity; Indian architecture also employs very slender columns as ornaments for the exterior of rock- built temples. 5. There is here, alas! no chronology, but according to the estab Ushed points which we possess it does not seem necessary to carry this flourishing period of Indian art (if we may use the expression) further back than the bloom of dramatic poetry in India (under Rajah Vicra- maditya who, according to the ordinary acceptation, died 56 years before the Christian era). Both of course presuppose epic poetry, and foUow it up. Buddhism also already existed at the time' of these architectural works (even Salsette, CarU and tbe temple of Visvakurma are Buddhis tic) ; now that reUgion dates from about 500 years before Christ. The oldest evidence for the existence of such architectural works is Barde- sanes' (200 years after Christ) description of an Indian cavern temple of an androgynous deity. Porphyr. in Stobseus, Bcl. Phys. i. p. 144, Hee ren. The revolting Ucentiousness of the representations in Elephanta (specimens of this description have passed from the Townley CoUection to the British Museum), also points to the times of internal decay. 0. Frank on the figure of Visvakarman, the architect of the world, in the Miinch. Abhdl. Philol, Cl. i, s. 765. Demetrius, son of Buthydemus, and other Bactrian princes founded Greek empires in the territory west of the Indus about 200 years before Christ ; and these were preserved in various forms tiU the invasion of the Mogolian Scythians or Sacse (136 before Christ), from whom Vicra- maditya deUvered India, Comp, Lassen De Pentapotamia, p, 42 sqq. In the series of coins found in India, and presented in one view by J. Todd in the Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society i. p. 313. pi. 12, the Indo-Scythian coins (especiaUy those of the lixaiKeiig jixaihiav (Edobi- gris) aarri^ p^eyxg, with Siwa on his buU as reverse) exhibit an interesting combination of Greek and Indian elements ; and even the more carefuUy executed Indian coins betray somewhat of the influence of the Greek style. Comp. Schlegel, Journ. Asiat. u. p. 321. St. Martin ix. p 280. The Indian gem with the figure of Hercules, communicated by Todd iii, i. p. 139 (D. A. K. Tf 53), is evidently an imitation of the coins of the Indian king De metrius (Tychsen, Comm. Soc. Gott. rec. vi. p. 3, Kohler, Mem. Romane iv. p, 82). At Barygaza (Baroandsh) there were in circulation coins of the Bactro-Indian kings, according to the Peripl. Mar, Ind. [Chr. Lassen Zur Geschichte der Griech. und der Indoskythischen Konige in Baktrien, Kabul and Indien durch Entzifferung der AltkabuUschen Legenden auf ihren Miinzen. Bonn. 1838.] 250. In the sculptures of India, the haut- and bas-reliefs which decorate the walls of these rock-built temples, and which, besides the beings belonging to the religious creed, also represent scenes from the great Indian epopees, we in like manner miss throughout that settled system which invariably characterizes art when it has sprung up from its own roots, and been fostered for many successive generations. On this very account indeed Indian sculpture ranks before Egyptian in the naturalness of its formations, and in variety of attitude and gesture; but it wants completely severity of design, and 260 INDIAN ART, regularity in the disposition of the figures. Moreover, in sculpture as well as architecture the conditions of site and 3 material operated detrimentally. As to characteristic differ ences of portraiture in different persons there does not yet seem to have been much discovered; here also the significance is communicated by attributes, dress, colour, monstrous ap- 4 pondages and the action itself However, in accumulation of attributes, combination of many-limbed shapes, constrained attitudes and striving after ornament, the old Indian style of art in the temple-grottoes appears quite moderate and reason able compared with the monstrosity of many idols and paint ings of modern India. 1. Epic scenes, for example the combat between Rama and Ravuna from the Ramajana, at BUora. Ardshuna receiving the celestial armour from Siwa and the guardians of the world, at Mahamalaipur. Vishnu as Crishna among the Gopis, at the same place. Both from the Maha barata, 4, Only that the images of the Buddhists and Jainas are kept simple intentionally. The latter are of black stone brightly polished, with curly hair and a sort of negro physiognomy. Indian idols in the East India House, Japanese stone images at Ley- den, described by Reuvens. Litekatitre. Niebuhr's Reise u. s. 31 ff. Tf 6 ff. W. Hodge's Select Views of Antiq. in India, N. 1 — 12. Sumptuous works by the brothers Daniell, The Excavations of BUora and others, in all 64 pi. They form the basis of LanglSs' Monumens anciens et modernes de I'Hindostan en 150 planches. P. 1812. Macneil in the Archseol. Brit. vol. viii. p. 251. Malet in the Asiatic Researches vi. p. 382. Lord Valentia's Travels, ii. p. 161 sqq. pi. 8 sq. Maria Graham, Journal, p. 122 sqq. Raflles's His tory of Java. Davy on the Interior of Ceylon. J. Todd's Annals and Antiquities of Rajast'han, p. 671. Seely's Wonders of Blora (comp. Classical Journal T. xxx). Treatises in the Transactions of the Bom bay Society (Erskine on Elephanta i. p. 198. Salt on Salsette i. p. 41,, Sykes on BUora ui. p, 265, pi. 1—13, Dangerfield on the Buddhistic grottoes of Baug ii. p. 194. Crawfurd on Boro-Budor in Java ii, p. 164, comp. Erskine iu. p. 494), and the Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society (Grindlay and Todd on BUora ii. p. 326. 487, with eight very faint engravings, Babington on Mahamalaipur ii. p. 258. pi. 1 — 12. 16., Edward Alexander on Adshunta, u. p. 362. pi. 1). Herder's Denkmahler der Vorwelt. Heeren Ideen Th. i. Abth. 3. s. 11 ff (1824). Creuzer SymboUk i. s. 562 ff. Bohlen, Indien and .^gypten n. s. 76. [0. Frank iiber Indische Denkmaler zur genaueren Kenntniss Indischer Kunst werke, Miinchner Gel. Anz. 1836 no. 126 ff. in opposition to the chronology and HeUenism of the author. Comp. Jen. A. L. Z. 1836. Inn. s. 368,] SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT OF ANCIENT AKT, PRELIMINARY DIVISION. GEOGRAPHY OF ANCIENT MONUMENTS OF ART, 1. GENERAL REMARKS. 251. As the history of ancient art in general teaches us I the time when ancient works of art came into existence, so information is also required as to the places where they ori ginally stood, where they were again discovered, and where they are now to be found; and guidance to these forms a necessary introduction to the archaeological study. As regards 2 architecture, which is rooted to the soil, if the monuments are still in existence, the three kinds of locality coincide ; as to the moveable products of sculpture and painting, on the other hand, the subject naturally separates itself into: 1. The artistic topography of antiquity (the i^iiyrimg or irie^iriyrisig of art, §. 35, 3), 2. Instruction as to the places of discovery, 3. 3 Information as to Museums. Now although this entire geo graphical division is in itself destitute of scientific connexion, because without a knowledge of political history as well as that of civilization, the changes of place which occurred to works of art must appear as something accidental, an acquain tance with museums however is of the greatest importance to the student, and the topography of art, together with instruc tion regarding the localities of discovery, are of not less con sequence to the inquirer as a principal means of criticism and interpretation (§, 39). The first as well as the third discipline 4 becomes more complicated from the numerous removals which works of art experienced in antiquity (§ 165. 214), and not less in later times. Then the movement was from Greece to 5 Rome, and afterwards partly to Byzantium, from the republics to seats of royalty, from the courts of temples to public porti coes and theatres, then to palaces, villas and baths; for mu seums of art, properly so called, that is, buildings destined 262 GEOGRAPHY OF ANCIENT ART. merely for the exhibition of art, remained almost utterly unknown to antiquity, in which art was intimately bound up with the rest of life. Now every step leads from Greece and Italy to the rest of civilized Europe, but in the latter country, however, — and it is to be hoped this will soon be the case also in the former, — the exportation is constantly exceeded by new accessions from within ; and the universal striving of the pre sent time is to form collections in royal and national museums. 6. Signa translata ex abditis locis in celebritatem thermarum occur in later inscriptions ; comp. Gerhard, Beachr. Boms, s. 320 i. Agrippa wished aU statues and pictures to be exposed to pubUc view, Plin. xxxv, 9. The foUowing were approximations to museums in antiquity: 1. The corners of temples and spelunci, in which decayed images of the gods were preserved. See particularly Ovid Met. x, 691. There was a col lection of this kind in the Argive Herseon. In Italy the favissce were used for keeping old temple-furniture. 2, The great coUections of works of art which were formed of themselves in the courts and vestibules of sanctuaries, as in the Bphesian temple, the Samian Herseon, the MUe- sian Didymseon, and at places where there were oracles and agones, such as Olympia. There were here also in the Herseon many chryselephan tine statues brought together with design. Similar collections of statues afterwards at Rome, in the porticoes of Octavia, §. 180. R. 2. 190, R. 1. i, a, 3. CoUections of the busts of learned men in pubUc museums, §. 420, 4, 4, Picture galleries, such as the PoecUe at Athens (§, 101, R. 2), the portico near the Propylasa (§, 109. R, i, 3,) the Lesche of the Cnidians (§, 134, R, 3), also a Poecile at Olympia and another at Sparta (Pausan ias), However, even here the destination was originaUy different ; the Poecile of Athens and the Lesche were more immediately intended to be conversation-haUs, In Strabo's time (xiv, p, 637) the great temple at Samos had become a pinacotheca, and there were others in the neigh bourhood ; and in the Roman period pinacothecse specially constructed for that purpose were certainly not uncommon (Varro, Pliny, particularly Vitruvius vi, 6), for instance those at Naples described by Petronius and Philostratus. Comp. Jacobs, Verm, Schriften ui, 469. 1808, 8vo. 5, Dac- tyUothecsB, such as that of Mithridates (§. 165, R. 2), the one founded by Scaurus the step-son of SyUa, and that consecrated by Julius Csesar in the temple of Venus Genetrix. [On the removal of works of art to Cple, Bottiger Archaol. der Malerei s. 231.] In the topography of art Jer. Jac. Oberlin, Orbis antiqui monumentis suis iUustrati primse Unese, 1776 and 1790, is a useful work, only it is now quite obsolete. The section Mon. Vet. popul. in Reuss Repertor. Comment, vui. p. 27 renders important services towards completing the Uterature. On museums Bottiger iiber Museen und Antikensammlun- gen 1808. 4to. The catalogue in Meusel, Neue Misc. artist. Inh. St. 9. s. 3 ff. Beck's Grundriss, s. 3 ff. Index to Winckelmann's W. vU. s. 321. 1 2. GREECE. 252. It is impossible to form an adequate notion of the COLLECTIONS, 263 abundance of works of art in Greece, A periegesis of the 2 country must pause at every small town ; the chief places as 3 to which, above all others, the archaeologist must possess ac curate topographical information, are Athens, Corinth with the Isthmus, Olympia and Delphi. There also most may be expected from local investigations. 1. Jacobs Ueber den Reichthum der Griechen an plastischen Kunst- werken. Verm. Schriften iii. s, 415. The smaU island of Bacchion near Phocsea, which is Uttle known, but was richly adorned with temples and statues, affords a remarkable instance, Liv. xxxvii, 21, 2. Good beginnings of a periegesis in Jacobs ibid. 424 ff., and Meyer Geschichte der Kunst s. 209 ff., but much stUl remains to be added. 3. Athens may be divided into the acropoUs, the old town on the south with the extensive Dionysian precincts (theatre, odeion, propylsea of Dionysus), and other ancient temples ; and into the northern quarters on the earUer site of the demi Cerameicus, Colonus, Melite and CoUytus, with fewer old temples. Hadrian's city was rebuilt on the south, and separated by a gate and remains of ancient waUs (§. 191). See espe ciaUy Meursius Compilationen. FaneUi Atene Attiche 1704. Stuart's Antiquities with the Supplement by Cockerell, Kinnaird, Donaldson, Jenkins and RaUton. L. 1830. Barbie du Booage's Plan in Barthelemy's Anacharsis. Wilkins, Atheniensia. L. 1804. [1816.] Hawkins in Wal pole's Memoirs, p. 480. Ersch's Bncyclopsedie, Art. Attika. Leake's To pography of Athens. L. 1821 ; in German with additions, at Halle, 1829. [sec. Ed. L. 1841. 2 vols.] Kruse's HeUas ii, 1. s. 70, Comp. also Hirt's Plan of the Athenian market-place, Geschichte der Baukunst, Tf 23, where, however, the distinction [much disputed by others,] between the old and new agora is not duly observed. Views of Thiirmer, Hubsch. Heger. [Ulrich's Topogr. of the Harbours of Athens, Abhdl. der Miinch ner Akad. iii, 3. s. 645. A plan of the city drawn by Schaubert, super- intendant of buildings at Athens, years ago, has not yet been made pubUc] Corinth can only as the Colonia Julia which Hadrian embellished, ad mit of accurate topographical investigation. The restoration is aided by coins, for instance those of Hadrian and the Antonines representing the Acro-Corinthus (MiUingen, M6d, Ined, pi, 2, 20 and 21. Mionnet Suppl. iv. pL 3. 6, 4), with the temple of Aphrodite, Pegasus at the foun - tain Peirene, and other sanctuaries (comp. the vase of Bernay, Journ. des Savants 1830. p. 460) ; and those representing in an interesting manner the harbour Cenchrsea (MiUingen 2, 19) with the ship-houses, the temple of Aphrodite at the one corner, that of Esculapius at the other, and the colossal Poseidon with trident and dolphin on a mole (xapix) in the middle of the harbour, exactly as it is described by Pau sanias (ii, 2, 3), Triumphal arch of Hadrian on coins. Comp. what is adduced in the Dorians ii. 433 (TufneU and Lewis) on the site of the Isthmian sanctuary ; and on the temples in detail, the inscription C. I. 1104 with Pausanias. The Isthmus is very interestingly represented on the gem, Eckhel, Pierres Grav. 14 : Poseidon in the centre, over him on the left a sea-deity bearing Palasmon, and Aphrodite Euploea on the 264 GEOGRAPHY OF ANCIENT ART. right, at the top Eros on a column with the horses of Poseidon coming to the Agon. The Palsemonion (Paus, ii, 2, 1, and the Inscr.) is to be seen on coins as a tholus, supported by light Ionic columns, with dolphins as acroteria ; within it in the middle a boy reclining on a dolphin as reU gious idol, and a pine-tree behind. Under the tholus stands the lower temple {dlurov in Pans., 'evxyiarii^iov in the Insor.) with its gate {xxiioiog viroyeoig Pans., ie^d ti'aolog in the Inscr.), to which a sacrificial procession is just approaching with the ram. — We also become acquainted with temples at Trcezen and Patrse by means of coins. Olympia's sacred enclosure, Altis, contain**! several temples, the high altar, a theatre, buleuterion, prytaneion, stadion, gymnasion, numerous thesauri, several porticoes, and numberless xyxT^pcxrx, dvi^ixvreg, and dva^iijxxrx ; the hippodrome was outside. On the locaUty : J. Spencer Stanhope, Olympia or Topogr, illustrative of the actual state of the Plain of Olympia, L. 1824. Leake, Morea V, I. ch. 1. Expedition Sclent, de la Moree, Archit. Livr. 10 — 13. Pindari Carm. iUustr. L. Dissenius, Sect. u. p. 630. Bncyclopsedie, Art. Olympia. [Le Bas Mon. de I'antiq. fig. recueilUs en Grfece par la commission de Moree 1 cah. Basrel. de Phigalie, 2 cah. ArgoUde et Laconic. P. 1835. 37. 8vo.] Delphi was in the form of a theatre ; on the highest terrace Pytho, the temenos with the temple (on reliefs and coins, Millingen M6d. In6d. pi. 2, 12), high altar, sanctuary of the Earth, buleuterion, several porti coes and the thesauri. Below these the middle and the lower town. The place of the agones was beneath the city towards the plain and Cir- rha. Pindari Carm. p. 628. (On the treasures of art, comp. Sainte Croix, Gouvern. Federatifs, p. 274.) [Ground plan by Ulrichs in his Rei sen in Griechenland 1840. By the same Topographie von Theben. Abhdl. der Miinch. Akad. iii, 2. S. 413. J. Spencer Stanhope, Topographical Sketches of Megalopolis, Tanagra, AuUs and Bretria. L. 1831 fo. Carthsea in Brondsted, Travels Th. 1. Argos in GeU.] 253. Although the ruins of temples and other architec tural works scattered over the districts of Greece are even now very considerable in amount, it is to be hoped, however, that under favourable circumstances, excavations undertaken with care and circumspection will bring to light the plan and architectonic details of a much greater number. The search for sculptures also, notwithstanding the Venetian and more modern acquisitions, will still find in many a region an almost virgin soil ; and we may look forward to a time when native museums will surpass all out of Greece in genuine remains of Greek art. 1. Architectpral remains mentioned in the historical portion of the work: at Tiryns §, 46, Mycenae 45, 49, Argos 45, Epidaurus 106. Corinth 53, Nemea 109, Phigalia 109, Tegea 109. Mantinea 111. Lycosura 45, Olympia 109, Messene 111. near Amyclse 48. in jEgina 80. at Athens 80. 101. 109. 153. 190. 191. in Attica 53. 109. in Delos 109. comp. 279. in Buboea 53. in Orchomenus 48. Delphi 80. in Ithaca 47, Ephyra and other Cyclopean waUs in Epirus 46, A Doric temple of GREECE, 265 peculiar construction at Cardaochio in Corfu, Railton, Antiq, of Athens Suppl, Ruins of Theatres, §. 289, 2, Sculptures found and coUected in Greece : Venetian acquisitions from the Peloponnesus and Corfu, collected chiefly by Antonio and Paolo Nani (about 1700) and later members of the same family (§. 261, 2). Paciaudi, Mon. Peloponnesiaca 1761. Many things came to Venice from Athens through Morosini (1687), for instance the two lions in front of the arsenal (with Runic characters) §. 434. The Elgin collection, from Athens, and other places also, in the British Museum ; the Phiga- Uan marbles (§. 119, 3) also there; the .Slginetan statues at Munich (§. 90, 3). Excavations in Ceos, Brondsted, Voyages et Recherches dans la Grfece. Livr. i. 1826. Many objects at Cambridge, through Clarke (Clarke, Greek Marbles, comp. §. 357), in the M. Worsleyanum, in the M. Royal at Paris (through Choiseul Gouffier and Forbin), especially the Venus obtained from the neighbourhood of the theatre of Milo, and more recently the fragments from Olympia, §. 119, and the Messenian basre- Uef (Leake, Morea i. p. 379. Ann. d. Inst. i. p. 131. iv. p. 184). Exca vations by VeU-Pasha near Argos, Magazin Bncycl. 1811. ii. p. 142. Numerous fragments of sculpture at Lucu (Thyrea). Leake ii. p. 488. Ann. i. p. 133. Gerhard sur les monumens figures existant actueUement en Grfece,Annali dell'Inst. ix,2.p. 103 — 150, statues, bas-reliefs, terracottas, painted vases, bronzes, mirrors, scarabsEi. On vases and reliefs while the museum was stUl in Mgina, Biblot. Ital. xii. p. 105. (1838). Basrelief A Bacchian sarcophagus from Mistra, Descr. de la Moree. pi. 43. fig. 1. 2. 3. 3. A collection of Athenian remains of art [formerly] in Fauvel's Consulate ; another founded since by Psyllas an Athenian (according to Stanhope's Letters), probably dispersed again. A National Museum in jEgina, mostly consisting of vases, bronze works and inscriptions, under Mustoxydi. [Removed to Athens where the museum has been hitherto distributed in the Theseion, Hadrian's Stoa, the Propylsea and other places on the AcropoUs. Athenian coUection of antiquities in A. SchoU's Archaol. MittheUungen aus Griechenland nach K. 0. MuUer's hinterlas- senen Papieren. Frankf 1843, not a few are engraved in Pittaki's ''Ecpnpis^lg «^p[;«;oAoy/;t?J x(px^aax rdg ivrog rrig 'EXA. dvevf^iux. xf>x^io^rirxg, ' A%vri(ii 1837 — 41. 2 vols. 4to. P. de Saulcy Musfe d'Athfenes in the Revue Archeol. ii. p. 257 — 77.] In Corfu, the museum of Signor Pros- salendi. Important desokiptivb travels for the archseology of art, after Cyri acus of Ancona (§. 46), especially Spon and Wheler, Chandler, Choiseul Gouflier, Voy. Pittor. de la Grfece, DodweU's Classical and Topographical Tour, with which Pomardi's Viaggio nella Grecia may be here and there compared, Gell's Itinerary of Greece (1818, in 4to., merely i. Argolis), Itin. of the Morea 1817, 8vo [Peloponnesiaca, a Suppl. to Trav, in the Morea. L. 1846.], Itin. of Greece 1819, 8vo, Narrative of a Journey in the Mo rea 1823, 8vo ; the articles collected in Walpole's Memoirs and Travels, Hobhouse, HoUand, Hughes, Bartholdy, Pouqueville. Leake, Travels in the Morea, 3 vols. L. 1830. Scharnhorst on jEgina, Ann. d. Inst. i. p. 201. [Brondsted's Reise i Griikenland i Aarene 1810 — 13. 1. 2 Deel. Kiobenh. 1844. 1st part. Magna Grecia, Epirus. 2nd part Boeotia, Thessaly, Asia 266 GEOGRAPHY OF ANCIENT ART. Minor, .ffigina, Ceos, Peloponnesus, lectures under fresh impressions not hastily written down. Christ. Wordsworth Residence at Athens and Attica L. 1836 (many passages in authors, ingeniously explained by the locali ties) and Greece pictorial, descriptive and historical, 1839. 2nd ed. 1844. Klenze Aphorist. Bem. B. 1838 fol. Aldenhoven ItinSraire descriptif de I'Attique et du Peloponnese avec cartes et plans topogr. Athfenes 1841. Col. W, Mure of CaldweU, Journal of a Tour in Greece and the Ionian Islands, 2 vols. Edinb. and L, 1842. fuU of knowledge and sagacity. Ul richs Reisen in Griechenland 1 Th. Travels from Delphi to Thebes. Bremen 1840. From the papers of the same by Henzen Viaggi ed investigazione neUa Grecia, Annali xviii. p. 1. and on Buboea in the Rhein. Mus, Bd. 5. L, Ross Reisen durch Griechenland 1 Th. Peloponn, B. 1841. and Reisen auf den Griech. Inseln 1. 2. 3. Bd. 1841^3. Rob. Pashley Trav. in Crete, 2 v. Cambr. and L. 1837. very learned and accurate. Henzen on the present state of antiquities in Greece, AUegem. Zeit. 1843 N. 28 ff. B. Curtius The more recent excavations in Greece, Preuss. Staatszeit. 1843. 9 Jan.] Architectural Works, Le Roy's (of Uttle use), Stuart (copied in Le Grand's Mon. de la Grfece P. 1808), the DUettanti Society's. (Careful engravings after these English works, with German text, Darm stadt, Leske.) Exped. de la Moree, §. 252. La Grfece ; Vues pittor. et topogr. dess, par 0. M. Bar. de Stackelberg, P, 1832, I 254. Macedonia, Thrace, and Illyria seem to be very poor in architectural ruins and mines of Greek art ; there are only found in these countries remains of the later Roman period. 2 On the other hand, the ruins of cities along the northern coast of the Black Sea are very important monuments of Grecian civilization, regarding which we must look forward earnestly for more connected communications. 1. Portico (of the Circus ?) at Thessalonica, §, 192, E, 6. Byzantium, 193, R, 8. There are drawings of the Col, istor., the GugUa girogUfica, (fee, in the Cabinet d'Estampes at Paris. Constantine the Great's marble column on the promontory of the Bosphorus. A so-caUed Pompey's pillar on the Black Sea, Voy, Pitt, de Constantinople et des Rives du Bosphore d'aprfes les dessins de Mr, MelUng, P. 1807. fo, Choiseul, Voy. T, ii, P, iv. Remains at Salona 1 93, R, 6, (even of amphitheatres and baths) ; Jadera (a gate or arch) ; Pola, §, 190 (T, Augustus' amphitheatre, arch of the Sergii), Stuart's Ant, iv, 1 — 3. AUason, Pictur. Views of the Antiq, of Pola, L. 1819, fo. DeU' amfiteatro di Pola — e di alcuni epigrafi e figuUne inedite deU' Istria con vii, tav, Saggio del Can, P. Stamowich, Venezia 1802. 8vo. Gianrinaldo Carli Antichita di Capodistria in the Archeografo triestino, vol, ni, Trieste 1831. Cassas, Voy, Pitt, de PIstrie et de la Dalmatie P. 1797 sqq, Rubbi, Antichitk Rom. deU' Istria, 4to. 2, Most of the treatises on the subject (by Kohler, R, Rochette and Stempowsky, P, v. Koppen, v, Blaremberg, comp. C. I. u. p. 80,) refer to inscriptions and coins. Waxel, Recueil de quelques antiquites trouv^es sur les bords de la Mer-Noire. B. 1803. 4to. Travels of Pallas, Clarke and others. CoUections. Museum at Odessa, in which there are fine sculptures from Kertsch (Panticapseon), Cabinet of Blaremberg and Stempowsky also ASIA AND AFRICA. 267 there ; others at Nicolaef, Kertsch and Theodosia. Notice sur un tombeau d6couvert aux environs de Kertsch, I'anc. Panticapfie (1830), in the Journ. des Sav. 1836. p. 333. [Discoveries at Kertsch, BuU. 1830. p. 265. 1841. p. 109. 1842. p. 164. 1844. p. 82. Annali xii. p. 5—22. Voyage au Cau- case — et en Crimfie par Fr. Dubois de Montp6roux iv. Sect. P, et Neu- chatel 1843.] 3. ASIA AND AFRICA. 255. Asia Minor abounded as much as Greece itself in I works of Greek art, on the western coasts from ancient times, and in particular tracts stretching far inland, from the Mace donian period ; and is even now perhaps richer in ruins, at 2 least in several kinds (for instance, we find the theatres in Greece more ruinous and difficult to make out than in Asia Minor and Sicily). 1. On the richness of the coast of Asia Minor, especiaUy Ionia, in works of art, Jacobs, s. 424. Meyer, s. 209 ff. On works of art at Ephesus some detaUs in the context, Tzez. Chil. viii, 198 ; Aspendus also was full of exceUent sculptures, Cic. Verr. ii, 1, 20. On Cilician works of art, from coins, Tolken Kunstbl. i. H. 6. We become acquainted with many sacred structures through coins of the emperors, from which BeUey especiaUy treats of the monuments of Pergamon, Ancyra, Tarsus, and Csesarea in Cappadocia, M6m. de I'Ac. des Inscr. xxxvu — xl. 2. Abohitectueal Remains mentioned above, at Sipylus §. 42. Sardis 80. 241.* Teos 109. Ephesus 192. Magnesia on the Mseander 109. Samos 80. Priene 109. MUetus 109. Labranda 192. HaUcarnassus 111. 151, 153, Cyzicus 153. Mylasa 192. Telmissus 245. Nacoleia 245. Many theatres (§. 289), also aqueducts and baths of the Roman period. Many remains likewise at New lUon, Alexandria Troas (many ruins constructed with arches), Assos (where the entire city can still be re cognised, and remarkable metope-reUefs have been found in the early Greek style, with sphinxes, wild animals and centaurs, [in Paris since 1838, M, d. I. iu, 34. AnnaU xiii. p. 317: besides the pieces there engraved Prokesch gives also Wiener Jahrb. 1832. u. S. 69 des Anzeigers a sitting Amor with his hand resting on the bow : they are of granite. Terier Voy. en Asie Mineure pi. 112. Clarac pi. 116, A. B.] and beautiful sarcophagi). Cyme, Smyrna, Heraclea on the Latmian lake (ruins of many buildings situated in an interesting manner among the rocks), (theatre in Hera clea, Beda ap. PhUon. Orellii p, 149) Myndos, Myus, Cnidos (where are very considerable ruins especiaUy of Doric architecture ; investigated by a mission of DUettanti), Xanthus, Phaselis, Perge, ClaudiopoUs, Celenderis, and in other cities of the south coast ; in the interior, ruins especially of the towns in the valley of the Mseander and Laodicea Catacecaumene ; in Cyprus ruins of Cition. Travels of P. Lucas, Tournefort, Pococke, DaUaway, Chandler, Choiseul Gouffier, Kinneir, for the south coast Beaufort's Caramania, for some northern regions Von Hammer's Umblick auf einer Reise von Bpel nach Brussa, Pesth 1818, and for the whole W, M. Leake, Journal of a Tour 268 GEOGRAPHY OF ANCIENT ART. in Asia Minor with comparative remarks on the ancient and modern geography of that country, L. 1824., 8vo. with a map which gives an excellent survey of former travels. A. v. Prokesch, Erinnerungen aus .aigypten und Kleinasien iii. s. 271 fo. Comp. Wiener Jahrb. Iviii. lix. Anz. The " Antiquities of Ionia" are enriched in the new edition with exceUent plans (of Priene, the vaUey of the Masander, the neighbourhood of the Didymseon, and the city of Samos) and architectural drawings. There are also exceUent designs by Huyot in the portfoUo. Discoveries by Terier in Asia Minor, Azani (Tschafder), large Grecian temple, thea tre, basreUefs, (BuU. 1834, p. 238.) Pessinus, Synnada, Phrygian nekro- polis with Greek and Phrygian inscriptions, between Synnada and Ancyra. Amasia, 10 leagues from the Halys, on the borders of Galatia, a Cyclopian city, full of splendid works, a gate with lion-heads. Tavia 1 relief on the rocks, of the Persian and Paphlagonian kings. Phrygian discoveries, Archseol. InteU. Bl, 1835, n, 20, Journ, des Sav, 1836, p, 365, Travels of the English in Asia Minor and Syria, Berghaus Annalen 1835, n, 123, S, 245, Prokesch on ancient Smyrna, Wiener Jahrb, 1834, iv, s, 55 of the Anzeigen, and on a necropoUs not far from Thyatira, and the earliest mines of Ida, Ann, d, I, vi, p. 192. Phrygian monuments in Steuart §. 341*, R. 3. partly drawn for the first time, 17 pi, [Sir Ch, FeUows, A Journal writ ten during an excursion in Asia Minor L, 1839, and an account of Discov, in Lycia during a 2nd excursion L, 1841, Comp, Journ, des Sav, 1842, p, 366, 385, W, Hamilton Researches in Asia Minor, Pontus and Arme nia L. 1842, 2 vols. Spratt and Forbes Trav, in Lycia, Milyas and the Cibyrate L, 1846, 2 vols. Col, Rottier's descr, des Mon, de Rhodes 1828, 4to,] 256. In monuments of Greek art Syria and Arabia seem only to possess architectural works of the florid Roman style, ! or a mixed Greco-Oriental, Monuments of this later period also extend through Egypt, the kingdom of Meroe and the i Oases. In the rest of Africa the towns of Cyrenaica have more recently become pretty well known, and the plan of Cyrene especially lies distinctly before our view ; but at the same time very little has been brought to light in detail of [ the early genuine Hellenic period. In western Africa there are extant numerous and considerable remains of Roman structures. 1. Existing monuments of Antioch, § 149. 192. (Justinian's walls ; triumphal arch on the road to Aleppo, Cassas i, 16), Sidon (tomb in the rocks, Cassas ii, 82), Tyre (aqueduct, ibid. 85), [aqueduct at Beirout, Revue Archeol. iii. pi. 57. p. 489.] between Tyre and Ptolemais (Ionic temple, ibid. 87), at Jerusalem §. 192, Emesa (Cenotaph of C. Ca3sar, Cas sas i, 21), HeliopoUs, Palmyra, Gerasa, Gadara (the cities of the basalt country Trachonitis, in which many structures were built after the time of Solomon, Ritter, Erdk. ii. s. 362), and Petra §. 192. At Seleucia on the Tigris (or Ctesiphon) ruins of a palace of the Roman period, accord ing to deUa Vall6. Cassas, Voy. Pitt, de la Syrie, de la Phoenicie, de la Palsestine et de la Basse Mgyptc, P. an. vii (incomplete), EarUer Travels by Belon, Maundrell, della Valle, Pococke, Burckhardt, Travels in Syria and the Holy Land, L. 1822, Trav, in Arabia, L, 1829, Buck- SYRIA, AFRICA, ITALY. 269 ingham, Trav. among the Arabian Tribes. L. 1825. 0. Fr. v. Richter WaUfahrten im Morgenlande. B. 1822. Count Bertou, Voy. dans les plaines du Haouran en Syrie in the BuU. ii. 1837. p. 161 — 171. Monu ments of Beirout, Mon. d. I. ii. tv. 51. Ann. x. p. 12. 2. Alexandria §. 149. 193. 224. Antinoe §, 191, Roman towers and waUs near Taposiris, at Babylon near Cairo, at Syene, Greco-.Sigyptian structures in Meroe §, 192, on the oasis of Amnion near Zeytun (Cail liaud, pi. 3. 5. 6). Romo-Christian buildings in Lower Nubia, on the northern and southern oases of Bgypt (in the latter there are often sepulchral monuments with arches on columns, CaiUiaud, pi. 21. comp. §. 218). Cosmas Indopleustes describes the marble throne of Ares near Adule, with the inscription of an Ethiopian King (Zoscales according to Niebuhi-), in late Roman style, resting on a spiral column. 3. Considerable Remains at Ptolemais (an amphitheatre, two thea tres) ; at Cyrene (an amphitheatre, two theatres ; scanty ruins of two temples, numberless tombs on the streets, sometimes in the rocks and sometimes built up, with frontispieces, partly painted) ; some remains at Naustathmus, ApoUonia, and different places further east. DeUa CeUa, Viaggio da TripoU aUe frontieri occidentali dell' Bgitto. Gen. 1819. F. W. and H. W. Beechy, Proceedings of the Expedition to explore the North coast of Africa from Tripoli eastward in 1821 and 1822. 1828. 4to. Pacho, Relation d'un Voyage dans la Marmarique, la Cyrenaique, et les Oases d'Audelah, et de Macadeh. 1827. 1828. 4to and fo. Comp. on the plan of Cyrene Gott. G. A. 1829. St. 42. 4. Amphitheatre at TripoUs (now Zavia), marble triumphal arch of M. Aurelius and L. Verus at Garapha (now Tripoli). Count Castiglioni, Mem. Geograph. sur la Partie Orientale de la Barbaric. Milan 1826. Large amphitheatre 429 X 368 ft. Arena 238 X 182, height 96, at Tys- derad el Deshemm. Sir HarvUle Temple's Travels into the Beylik of Tunis, Ausland 1835. no. 102. Ruins of Leptis Myra by Delaporte, Journ. Asiat. iii. S. T. I. no. 4. p. 315. Cisterns of Carthage, excellent composite vaults. SemUasso's Africa ui. S. 214. [Falbe, Rech. sur I'emplacement de Car thage, see Letronne. J. des Sav. 1837. p. 641.] Excavations by Grenville Temple and Falbe Zeitschr. A. W. 1839. S. 7 f Aqueduct near Tunis, amphitheatre at Tisdra (el Jemme), Ruins of Cirta or Constantina (Ves tiges d'un anc. Tombeau dans le Royaume d'Algier auprfes de Constantine, dess. par BelUcard), of Lambesa, Sufetula, (fee. Shaw, Travels in Barbary and the Levant. Hebenstreit, De Antiq. Rom. per Africam repertis. 1733. 4to. ¦ 4. ITALY. 257. Italy unites in itself in the most interesting manner 1 districts of the most diff'erent kinds for the topography of art. I. The district of a Grecian artistic world which had been 2 naturalized in Italy by means of colonies. The shores of Lower Italy and Sicily belong to it, as well as many portions of the interior of these countries. The splendour of art in 3 these lands is exhibited in their peculiar architectural works. 270 GEOGRAPHY OP ANCIENT ART. 4 There are comparatively few. sculptures in marble and metal, yet many objects have been found of distinguished excellence, 5 and in the purest and finest Greek style ; on the other hand, the necropolises of the Greek and semi-Greek cities of this region are the principal mines of the different sorts of Greek vases, from whose more or less tasteful form and elegant painting we can, with tolerable certainty, estimate the degree to which Grecian civilization had penetrated even among the rural in habitants of Campania, Lucania, and Apulia (§. 163, 7), and at the same time learn of many places which were Hellenized and devoted to art, although this would not have otherwise been expected. II. The circle of inland nations who by their 6 own activity naturalized Greek art among themselves. To • this division belongs especially the country of the Etrus cans from Pisae to Ctere, together with Felsina and Adria; the Volscian Velitrte and the Latin Prseneste, as well as a part of Umbria, are connected therewith by means of individual monuments or classes of them (terracotta reliefs, mirrors). 7 The places where vase paintings have been found are limited to the southernmost portion of Etruria, particularly the tract of coast opened to Grecian commerce, and Adria, the great 8 emporium on the upper sea (comp. §. 99. 143. 177). The riches of this region in native monuments have found an abiding place in numerous collections in the country. 1. General helps to the artistic topography of Italy : Bern. Montfau con, Diarium Italicum. P. 1702. 4to. Travels especially of Don Juan Andres, de la Lande and Volkman, Keyssler, Petit-Radel, Eustace and Colt Hoare, Fr. v. der Recke (edited by Bottiger), Morgenstern, Kepha- lides, V. d. Hagen, Thiersch and Schorn, K. Fr. SchoUer (Bandelet de Dairval, De I'UtUite des Voyages). Neigebauer's Handbuch fiir Beisende in ItaUen. Hase, Nachweisungen fiir Beisende in ItaUen. Lpz. 1821. Fr. Blume Iter ItaUcum. Bd. i — iii. 1824-1830, also gives by the way valu able notices of museums. Chr. Kopp ItaUen. 1837. 3. Remains of architectural works in Magna Gbecia : Poseidonia, §. 80. Scanty ruins of Blea (Munter's VeUa. 1818). Doric ruins of a hexastyle temple, and beautiful terracotta fragments at Metapontum, Due de Luynes, Metapontum. 1833. There is hardly any thing remain ing of aU the Greek structures at Tarentum, Thurii, Crotona (Paw, M6m. concernant le temple de Junon Lacinienne, M6m. de la Soc. de Cassel, p. 67). On some ruins at Locri, Luynes, Ann, d, Inst, ii, p, 3. [VeUa, Idem AnnaU i. p. 381—86.] Ughelli, Italia Sacra ix. gives some information as to the ruins of these cities. • On ruins of the towns in BasiUcata Lom- bardi, BuU. d. Inst. 1830. p. 17. D. A. Lombardi suUa topogr. e sugU avanzi deUe ant. cittk Italo-greehe, Lucane, Daune, e Peucezie deU' odierna BasiUcata Memorie deU' Inst. Archeol. iii. p. 195. Ruins of temples in Sicily : Syracuse §. 80 (two columns of the Olympieion remained stand ing to a recent period). Acragas and SeUnus, 80. 109. Egesta 109. [Gela, a large column of a temple extant, Pizolanti Mem. Istor. deU' ant. cittk ITALY. 271 di Gela, in Palermo 1753, 4to. Romano Antiohitlb Jermitane (Himera), Palermo 1838. 8vo.] Catana, ruins of a temple, two theatres, an amphi theatre, and a circus. At Solus, near Panormus, interesting fragments of architecture, and sculptures. Duke of Serradifalco, Cenni su gU avanzi deU' Antico Solunto. Pal. 1831. comp. Bull. d. Inst. 1830. p. 229. 1831. p. 171. Ruins of theatres, §. 289. Vito Capialbi suUe mura d'Hipponio, Mem. d. Inst. Archeol. u, 159. tav. 4. 6. [Ground plan of Selinus by GflttUng in the Hermes xxxvii, 2, and the chief cities of the island in Serradifalco.] Cyclopean structures of Cefalu, §. 166. R. 3. Catacombs of Syracuse. — Of Sardinia (also tombs in the rocks) and Gozzo, §. 166. R. 3. [Onor. Bros Malta iUustr. co' monum. 1817.] 4. The baptismal vase at Gaeta (now at Naples) from Salpion, Welcker Zeitschr. s. 500. The splendid shoulder-plates of a suit of armour with Amazonian battles from Locri, in Brondsted's possession, [now in the Brit., Mus. The place of discovery is a fiction, as the seUer at Naples himself confesses. P. 0. Brondsted Die Bronzen von Siris Kopenh. 1837. 4to.] The beautiful sarcophagus in the cathedral of Agrigentum (Pigonati, tb. 47. Houel iv. pi. 238. St. Non iv. p. 82. A stucco cast in the British Museum). Several in Sicilian churches, Hirt Berl. Kunstblatt ii. s. 73. LandoUna has excavated many excellent articles at Syracuse. 6. Jorio's Metodo per invenire e frugare i sepolcri degli antichi, N. 1824, extracts in the Kunstblatt 1826. N. 46-53. It is observed that the necropoleis of the Greek cities always lie facing the north. Places in Magna Grecia, where vases have been pound (see especiaUy Gerhard's Cenni topogr. BuUet. 1829. p. 161). In Campania, Nola (beautiful vases in varnish and design; also antique vases of the Ught yeUow sort), Cumse (stiU too Uttle investigated), AveUa (vases of a pale colour), Capua (duU varnish; antique also), Nocera (Nolan), Eboli (more in the Lu- cano-ApuUan manner ; comp. Ann. iii. p. 406. iv. p. 295) ; in Samnium, particularly Agata de Goti in the Beneventine (careless in design, red and white colour) ; in Lucania, Psestum (beautiful vases of the best kind). Tombs of Psestum, Bull. 1834. p. 60., CasteUuccio, Anzi [Antia, not a few vases of a pecuUarly grandiose style, and exquisite myths, the great majo rity usuaUy Bacchian or so-called toUette vases, in 1842 a collection at the place, caUed the Fattibaldi, consisting of 400 articles,] and Armento in the interior of the BasiUcata (places where were found the ornamental vases of slender form, and richly ornamented with mythological scenes, bad in varnish and colours, the design mannered) ; busts, vases, brazen accoutrements, Galateo, lapygia, p. 97 ed. Basil. ; in Apulia, Bari, Ruvo, CegUa, Canosa (where, together with the language of the country, a cor rupt Greek was spoken, Horace S. i, 10, 30. §. 163, 7) ; Ruvo, BuU. 1834. p. 36. 164. 228. [Giov. Jatta suU' ant. cittb, di Ruvo, in Nap. 1844. 4to. p. 56 sqq., his great excavations and coUection of vases ; AveUino's Rubustinorum numorum catal. appended. Tombs of Ruvo, Bull. 1836. p. 69. 113. 1837. p. 81. 97.] ; in Bruttii, Locri (vases of antique descrip tion, others of exquisite beauty). In Sicily especially Agrigentum (antique vases of the red yeUow kind, but others also, very grandly and beautifuUy designed, of the more perfect style of technics; Panettieri Collection ; Memoirs by Raff. PoUti) ; in the interior Acrse, now Palaz- zuola, rich in tombs, vases, and terracottas. Le antich. di Acre scoperte. 272 GEOGRAPHY OF ANCIENT ART, descritte ed, illustr, dai Bar, G, Judica, Messina, 1819, fo. Comp, Ger hard and Panofka Hyperb, Rom, Stud, s, 155 ff, (Kunstb. 1825. 26) and the preface to Neapel's Antiken, [also Bibl. Ital. 1820. Febr, s. 222 sqq,] Tombs at Palermo, BuU, 1834, p, 209, MartoreUi, Antichitk Neapolitane. Travels of Riedesel, Swinburne, and others, De St, Non, Voy, Pittoresque de Naples et de Sicile, Munter, Nachrichten von Neapel u, Sicilien, 1790, Bartel's Briefe iiber Calabrien u, Sicilien, 1791-93,— FazeUus, De rebus SicuUs, 1658, fo, Andr. Pigonati, State presente degli Ant. Monumenti SiciUani, a. 1767. Viaggio per tutte le Antich. deUa SiciUa descr. da Ign. Paterno Pr. di Biscari, N, 1781, 4to, Houel, Voy, Pitt, des, lies de Sicile, de Malthe et de Lipari. P, 1782, 4 vols, fo, Bern. OUvieri, Vedute degU Avanzi dei Mon. Antich. delle due SiciUe. R. 1795. Pancrazi, d'Orville, Wilkins, Hittorff (see §. 80, 109), Raf PoUti II viaggiatore di Girgenti e il Cicerone di piazza ovvere guida agU avanzi di Agrigento, Girgenti 1826, [1842 by the Same, Antichita e mon, per servire aU' opera intit, il viagg, 40 tav. 8vo.] 6, On Etrurian monuments of art in general, §. 168 — 178, Volaterrse, §, 168, 70, 71, 74, 76, Pyrgos, Cyclopean foundations of the temple of Bileithyia, J, MelUngen Archaol, InteU, Bl, 1836, No, 11, [Canina An nali d, Inst, xii. p. 34. ant. Castello di Pirgi.] Fsesulse 168. 70. Arre tium 170. 71. 72. Vetulonium 168. Inghirami Memor. d. Inst. ii. p. 95. Ambrosch p. 137. RuseUre 168. Populonia 168. 76. Cosa 168. Tela mon 176. Cortona 168. 70. Perusia 168. 73. 74. 75. Saturnia 168. Volci 169. 70. 73. 74. 75. 77. BuUett. 1835, p, 177, Clusium 170. 71, 73, 74. 75. 76, 77, 78, Faleru 168, 70. Tarquinu 170. 72. 73. 74. 77. Axia 170. Orchia 170. Bomarzo 169. 70. Viterbo 170. Tuscania 170. Veil 168. Adria on the Po 170. 77. Pr^neste 173. Alba Longa 1 68. 70. Velitraj 171. Umbria 176. Ameria 168. Spoletium 168. 7. Places where vases have been found in Etruria : Necropolis of Volci on the river Arminia (Flora) near Ponte della Badia ; excavations since 1828, on the estates of Prince Lucian of Canino, the Candelori and Feoli. The Dorow-Magnus CoUection in the Royal Museum at Berlin. On the kinds of vases §. 99, 2. 143, 2. On the localities, Westphal, To pogr. dei cont. di Tarquinii e Vulci, Ann. d. Inst. ii. p. 12. tv. agg. a. b. Lenoir, Ann. iv. p. 254. M. I. 40. Works of Pr. Lucian: Museum Btrusque de L. Bonaparte. 1829. Catalogo di scelte antichita, (Bstratto, Ann. i. p. 188). Vases Etrusques de L. Bonaparte Livr. i. ii. (Bullet. 1830, p, 143, 222), Candelori vases : BuU, d, Inst, 1829, p, 75 ff. The splendid collection described by Second. Campanari Rome 1837. Idem Intorno i vasi fitt. rinvenuti ne 'sep. d'Etruria R. 1836. 4to. Brondsted. A brief descr. of 32 anc. Gr. vases lately found by M. Campanari, L. 1832. C. Pea Storia de' vasi dipinti che da quattre anni si trovano R. 1832. Ne cropolis of Tarquinii, chiefly vases of the archaic sorts, v. Gerhard, Hy perb. Rom. Studien. s. 134. Csere, a very promising mine. BuU. 1834. p. 49. 97. 1836. p. 169. Bomarzo, fine vases and bronzes. Clusium, numerous antique vases Bull. 1837. p. 192. [A great number of black vases only to be met with here and in the neighbourhood, of various forms and with ornaments and figures in relief] Adria on the Po, fragments of vases found in the burying-place on the Tartaro, strikingly simUar to those of Volci in forms, paintings, and inscriptions, also terracottas, mosaics, marble fragments, and intaglios collected in the Bocchi Museum. See ITALY. 273 Filiasi, Giorni. deU' Ital. Letter. Padova. T. xiv. p. 263. [Kramer Ueber den Styl u. die Herkunft der bemalten Griech. Thongefasse s. 198 — 206,] A manuscript work in the Vienna cabinet of antiquities. Steinbiiohel Wiener Jahrb. 1830, ii, s, 182, &c. inloco. Welcker in the BuU, 1834.p, 134, (comp. HaU A. L. Z. 1834. Inn.) R. Rochette Annali vi. p, 292, I find the painter Buthymides twice in the inscriptions on these potsherds, as well as at Volci, The great traffic of antiquity in earthenware certainly compre hended likewise painted vases, and hence we may account for the appear ance of closely corresponding works in regions far apart ; for instance the slaying of the minotaur on an Attic vase, in the possession of Burgon, London, [now in the Brit. Mus.] is designed precisely in the same way as on the famous SicUian vase of Taleides in Hope's CoUection. The first vases found in the country of the Sabines at SommaviUa, BuU. 1837. p. 65. 70. (Hiero painter) 207. [The vase with the rising and setting sun, Mon. d. Inst. ii. 55. Annali x. p. 266. xiv. p. 210. Another from the same place has been pubUshed by L. Grifi as II ratto del Palladio, Roma 1845, an enigmatical representation, one in Berlin, Gerhard Neuer- worbene Denkmaler, N. 1789.] 8. Etruscan museums : The Guarnacci, afterwards foundation of the public one, at Volterra : [in 7 rooms about 500 Etruscan urns] at the same place that of the Franceschini, of the Cinci. Antiquities in the Campo Santo at Pisa, placed there since 1810 (Lasinio Sculture del Campo Santo). [Roman not Etruscan]. BibUoteca pubUca [the Mus. since 1814, a work by D. Ant. Fabroni.] and Mus. Bacci at Arezzo. Aocademia Etrusca and Mus. Venuti at Cortona (M. Cortonense §. 178) ; the Corazzi collection of bronzes has been sold and taken to HoUand. Ansidei, Oddi, and other coUections at Perugia (see Lanzi's Catal., comp. Blume ii. s. 210), public cabinet there. [Indie, antiqu. per U gabinetto archeol. di pro priety del magistrate di Perugia 1830. 8vo. by VermiglioU, partly from Oddi house.] BuccelU at Montepulciano. Casuccini, Paolozzi at Chiusi, U Circo also there. Etrusco Mus. Chiusino dai suoi possessori pubbl, con brevi espos. del cav. Inghirami P. i. ii. PoUgrafia Fiesolana 1834. Rug- gieri at Viterbo. SmaU coUection, the CervelU, at Orvieto, and various others. Besides the general books of travels for Etruria the valuable work of Targ. Tozzetti : Relazioni d'alcuni viaggi fatti in Toscana. 258. But by far the most extensive and productive is III, 1 the domain of Greek art which became subservient to the Romans, and was employed in the embellishment of Roman edifices. Rome is even in the great number of its existing 2 architectural remains, with which are sometimes connected very productive mines of statues, the capital of the ancient world of art, and the inost icciportant spot on earth to the archaeologist, although it produced so few artists in ancient times; the topography of Rome forms a considerable branch 3 of the study. The monuments and ruins still extant are 4 chiefly crowded round the oldest and, in a political sense, the most important part of ancient Rome — the Forum Romanum and the Via Sacra; doubtless also for this reason, that in the S 274 GEOGRAPHY OF ANCIENT ART. middle ages the population early withdrew from that neigh bourhood and left it to the past, while the Campus Martius, a city of magnificent structures in the time of the Emperors, because the new life in an especial manner settled there, ex hibits few monuments, and for the most part only such as could be made to suit the wants and aims of that period. 5 The extensive gardens which occupy the east and west of Rome, therefore, abound in mines, and have filled entire mu seums; with the history of the latter is closely connected that of their possessors. 2. There are few connected accounts of early excavations, such as Flam. Vacca, Notizie Antiquario. a. 1594 (in Fea, MisceU. filolog. T. i.) ; of the results of more modern investigations Guattani (§. 38. R, 2) gave early an account, then Fea in numerous memoirs (Prodrome di nuove osservaz. e scoperte fatte nolle ant, di R, 1816), together with the arti cles by Gerhard in the Kunstb, 1823-26 (now Hyp, Rom. Studien, s, 87 ff.), " Romische Ausgrabungen." Memorie Romane di Antichitk e di Belle Arti, from 1824 downwards. 1827. T. 4, Discoveries since 1823, Atti d, Accadem, Rom. di Archeol. u. 639. Instituto di Corr. arch, from 1829, especiaUy the Rivista Generale del BuUet. Chronological survey of the explorations in the Forum since 1802 by Bunsen, BuUet. d. Inst. 1829. p, 32, then AnnaU vi, p, 13, vu, p, 53, BuU, 1834, p. 226. 1835, p, 33, 65, 3, The fragments of the ancient plan, from the temple of Romulus and Remus, have been published by Bellori (Thes. Ant. Rom. iv.) Ama duzzi and Piranesi (Antich. Rom. i.) Topooraphers : Flav. Biondo 1449, of more importance Andr, Fulvio 1527, Barthol, MarUani, Topogra- phia EomsB. R. 1544 and 1588, Panvini 1658. Boissard, §.. 37. R. 3. The inquiry not materiaUy forwarded by Donati, Roma Vetus et Recens 1638, and Nardini, Roma Antica 1666 (Thes. Ant, Rom, iv.), fourth edi tion 1818 by Nibby. Fr. Ficoroni, Vestigi e Raritk di Roma Ant. R. 1744 (in Fea T. i.). Adler's Beschreibung der Stadt Rom. Guattani, Roma Antica 1793, new ed. 1805. Venuti, Descr. Topogr, deUe antichita di Roma, 2d ed. R. 1803, new ed, by Stef. PiaU. R, 1824, Fea, N. Des crizione di R, antica e moderna, R, 1821, 3 vols. 8vo. The same author suUe Rovine di Roma (Storia dell' Arti T, iii,). Edw. Burton, Descr. of the Antiquities and other Curiosities of R. L. 1821. C. Sachse, Gesch. und Beschr. der Alten Stadt R. 2 vols. 1824, and (after the author's death) 1828. Beschreibung der Stadt Rom. von E. Platner, C. Bunsen, B. Ger hard and W. RosteU i. (general part) 1830. u, (Vatican) i. 1832. [2. 1834. ui, 1. 2. 3. 1837. 38. 42. Extract therefrom by Platner and Ulrichs, L, Canina Indicaz, Topografica di Roma ant. 3. ed. 1841, with a large plan. By the same, Espos. Stor. e topogr. del foro Rom. e sue adjacenze ed. 2. R. 1845, with 14 pi. The same Sul CUvo, suUa posizione e suU' architettura del tempio di Giove Capit. in the Mem. d. Ac. Rom. di Archeol. T. vi, Stef. PiaU Sopra alcuni monum, di Roma Dissertazioni R. 2, T, 1833, 34. 4to,] W, GeU Topogr, of Rome, Plan by NolU 1748 ; an extract in Monaldini 1818, a more complete one in Bunsen, Vasi's Itinerario, modernized by Nibby, — The most important works with engravings are referred to §. 37 R 3. and §. 190. The principal works of Piranesi are DeUa magnific. REMAINS OF THE ROMAN PERIOD IN ROME. 275 ed architett. de' Rom. R. 1761. and Antichith, Rom. R. 1748-56. 4 vols. fo. Views by Piranesi, Domen. Pronti, Clerisseau and Cunego, and Rossini. Views of aU the seven hiUs in Cassas and Bence's Grandes Vues. 4. The foUowing is a summary of the architectural remains men tioned in §. 179. 180. 190-95 (with some additions), in the direction of the Augustan district, and within the Aurelian walls. 1, Porta Capena, Tomb of the Scipios, 2, CseUmontana. S. Stefano Rotondo (the so- caUed Temple of the Faun, an edifice of later antiquity). S, Giovanni in Laterano, obelisk, baptistery of Constantine, 3, Isis and Serapis (the southern part of the EsquiUne). CoUseum. Baths of Titus. Palace of Titus (Sette Scale). Nero's House in part (Camere EsquiUne). Basil ica S. Clemente, 4, Via Sacra (Nibby, del Foro R,, deUa via sacra, deU' anfiteatro Flavio e de' luoghi adjacenti. R, 1819), The arch of Titus (near the high road of the Via Sacra. Bullet, d. Inst. 1829. p. 56). Meta Sudans. Templum Urbis. Temple of Peace, Temple of Antonine and Faustina (San. Lorenzo in Miranda). 5. The EsquiUne. Agger of Tarquin. Prsetorian camp. Amphitheatrum Castrense. Nym- phsBum of Alex. Severus. Temple of Minerva -Medica. The arch of GaUienus. Painted house (of LucUla?) §, 210, R, 4, 6, Alta Semita (Quirinal and Viminal). Baths of Diocletian and Constantine, Monte- CavaUo. 7, Via lata (westward from the Quirinal). 8, Forum Romanum (on the situation and extent of the Forum, Sachse i, s. 698. and the plan by Hirt, Gesch. der Baukunst, Tf 23). [Bunsen les forums de Rome Mon. d. I. u, 33. 34. Annal. vui. p. 207—281. ix, p. 12—60. By the same Restoration of the Rom, For, and of the magnificent fora of Csesar and the emperors, Beschr. Roms ui, 2. s. 1 — 188.] Temple of Jupiter To nans (i), of Saturn according to Niebuhr, confirmed by Bunsen. The so-caUed temple of Concord, and remains of the real temple of Concord, which probably Septimius Severus and his sons restituerunt. Arch of Septimius, Column of Phocas. So-called temple of Jupiter Stator, BasiUca JuUa. [Gerhard deUa Bas. Giulia ed alcuni siti del foro Rom. estratt. daUe Effemer, Letter. R, 1823, 8vo. His view confirmed by an inscription, BuU. 1836. p. 33.] So-caUed temple of Castor (three columns before Maria Liber.). Career Mamertinus (robur TulUanum, Leon. Adami's Bicerche. R, 1804. 4to, Capitolium (Zoega, Abhandl, 331) and Arx (the southern summit of the hUl, comp. Dureau de la MaUe in MiUin's Ann, encycL ix. p. 17). Arco di Giano. SmaU arch of Severus, So-caUed temple of Vesta (S. Stefano on the Tiber, a peripteral tholus). So-called temple of Portuna ViriUs, Mouth of the Cloaca Maxima, Forum of Augustus (according to Hirt, Niebuhr and others ; Sachse caUs this erro neously the Forum of Nerva ; Temple of Mars Ultor (Sachse assumes only one temple of the name). Forum of Nerva; temple of PaUas, Forum of Trajan ; Column ; BasUica Ulpia. 9, Circus Plaminius (the greatest part of the Campus Martius). The Saepta rightly conceived (in connexion with the disagreement of so many centuries at the same time) by Peter and Ztschr, f. A W. 1839. S. 137. Theatre of MarceUus, near which stood formerly (Ant. Labacco, Alcune notabili antiqu, di Roma, V, 1584) a Doric perip teral temple. Portico of Octavia, Theatre of Pompey. Baths of Agrip pa; Pantheon. Arch of Claudius, Column and temple of M. Aurelius. ObeUsk on Mount Citorio. Mausoleum of Augustus, ObeUsk in the Piazza del Popolo, 10, Palatium, Palatine palaces of the Emperors 276 GEOGRAPHY OP ANCIENT ART, (Scavo RanourelUano, Guattani M, I, 1786, Genu, Ott.), Septizonium. Arch of Constantine. 11. Circus Maximus. Circus (Bianchini, Circi Max. iconographia. R, 1728, fo.). 12. Piscina PubUca (continuation of the Aventine). Thermse Antoniniano. 13. Aventinus. Pyramid of Cestius (Falconieri, Thes. Ant. Rom. iv. p. 1461). [Piranesi Mon, de' Sci pioni, 1785, f m.] 14, Transtiberina (Janiculum), Beyond the fourteen districts: Campus Vaticanus, Hadrian's Mausoleum. BasiUca of St. Peter. On the Via Ostiensis : BasiUca of St. Paul. On the Via Appia (Labruzzi, Via Appia iUustr.) : Monument of Cascilia MeteUa. Tomb of Claudia Semne (Uhden in Wolf and Buttmann's Museum i. B. 534) and many others, [Di due Sep, Bom, del secolo di Augusto scov. presso la tomba de' Scipioni dai Cav, G. P. Campana R, 1840, fol, Grifi Sepolcro nella vigna Lozano R, 1840, 4to,] Columbarium of the freedmen of Livia (works of Bianchini, Gori, de Bossi). Catacombs of the Christians. Cir cus of CaracaUa (Bianconi, Desor. dei Circi. R. 1789. fo.). Fountain of Bgeria (Wagner, De fonte et specu Bgerise. 4to.). On the Via Nomen tana : BasiUca of St. Agnes. Tombs of Constantia and Helena. On the Via Plaminia : Tomb of the Nasones §. 210. R. 4. On the Via AureUa: Painted sepulchral monuments of the Villa Corsini (in BartoU), [of the ViUa PamfiU, from which drawings were taken for publication and copies in colours at Munich in the United CoUections, P. Secchi Mon. Ined. di un Sepolcro di famiglia Greca scop, in Roma sulla via Latina. R. 1843. fol. The paintings in Cav. Campana.] 5. Worthy of especial notice : ViUa Mattel on the Cselian HiU ; Villa Giustiniani, now Massimi, eastward from Mount CseUus; V. Negroni and Altieri behind the EsquiUne; V. Barberini behind the Quirinal; V. Ludovisi on the Pincian Hill, colUs hortulorum (here lay the large SaUustian gardens, Gerhard's Abhandlung in Gerlach's edition of Sal- lust) ; V. Farnese and Spada on Mount Palatine ; V. Corsini between the Janiculum and Vatican; V. Albani before the Porta Nomentana; V. Borghese before the P. Plaminia and Pinciana. 259. In the countries surrounding Rome, in Latium, the places which were selected by the emperors as country-resi dences, such as the splendid Antium, Tibur, also Lavinium (but not Alba Longa as we might have expected from Domi- tian's love of magnificence), are especially productive sources „of works of art, without being so exclusively. Latium. Kircher's Latium, fo. 1761. Vet. Latii antiqua vestigia. R- 1761, enlarged : Vet. Latii antiquitatum ampUss. coUectio. R. 1771, not of much use. Bonstetten, Voy. sur la sofene des dix dem. livres de 1' Bneide. P. 1805. Sickler, Plan Topogr. de la Oampagne de R. with text in 8vo. Weimar 1811. R. 1818. Nibby, Viaggio antiq. ne' contorni di R. R. 1819. 2 vols. 8vo. Sickler and Reinhardt's Almanach aus Rom. ii. 8. 182. Tf 13 ff. J. H. Westphal, Die Rom. Kampagne. B. 1829. 4to., with two maps. W. Gell, Essai Topogr. des environs de R. (v. Ann. d. Inst. u. p. 113.) In detail: Gabii, Forum §. 295. [Temple of Gabus and Aricia, Annali xu. tv. D. p. 23. Vbii, Canina Descr. deU' ant. cittk di Veil R. 1847, opera edita in pochi esemplari da distribuirsi in done fol. p. 83 sqq. A list of the (175) works of sculpture and fragments found there in 1824 and purchased by the government.] Statues in V, Borghese §, 261. Alba Longa (Pira- ARCHITECTURAL REMAINS IN LOWER ITALY, 277 nesi's Antich, di Alb. e di Cast, Gandolfo), Emissary §, 168, R, 3, Tomb §, 170. R, 3. Singular urns (Tambroni and Aless, Visconti in the Atti deir Ace. Arch. Rom. ii. p. 257. 317). Lanuvium §. 191. Prjeneste, Suaresi, Prseneste antiqua. R. 1665, Temple of Portuna, II tempio della Portuna Prenestina ristaur. da Const. Then, desor. da A. Nibby, R, 1825. 8vo. Tibur, so-caUed temple of Vesta (Desgodetz, ch, 5), of the Sibyl, deUa Tosse, Supposed ViUa of Msecenas. Ant. del R6, DeU' anti- chitk Tiburtina. R. 1611. Stef. Cabral and Fausto del R6, Delle viUe e monumenti ant. deUa cittk e del territorio di Tivoli. R. 1779. ViUa of Hadrian, §. 191. Horace's Sabine country-house. Capmartin de Chaupy, Decouverte de la Maison de Campagne d'Horace. 3 vols. 8vo. Nibby, Viaggio antiqu. aUa villa di Orazio, a Subiaco e Trevi, Mem. Rom. iv. p. 3 — 81. Le Antichitk di Alba Fucense negli Equi, misurate e descritte daU' archit. Carlo Promis. Roma 1836, 8vo. BuUett. 1836. p. 76 (Road to Rome, the fortification, kinds of stone, temples, Tuscan basiUca). Tusculum, catacombs, tomb of the Furia famUy. Considerable new excavations by Lucien Bonaparte. Comp. Kunstb. 1826. n. 3. [Canina Descr. del Antico Tusculo, 1841 fob] Cora, Doric temple of Hercules. G. AntoUni, Opere T. i, 1. Piranesi, Antichitb. di Cora. R. 1761. fo. Ostia, LucateUi, Diss. Corton. vi. Harbours, §. 190. R. 2. Fea, Relazione di un viaggio ad Ostia. The same, Alcune Osserv. sopra gU ant. porti d'Ostia. Sickler's Almanach i. s. 284. u. B. 231. 244. Excavations BuU. 1834, p. 129. Archaol, InteU, Bl, 1834. No. 61. Antium, greatly embeUished under Caligula and other Csesars of the house of Augustus ; Theatre and other remains. A mine of exceUent statues, v. especiaUy Winckelm. W. vi, 1. s. 259. and Pea ibid. 2. s. 320. PhU. a Turre Mon. vet. Antu. R. 1700. Fea, Bull. d. Inst. 1832. p. 145. Aphrodisium in the neighbourhood; where 23 sta tues were found in 1794. Terracina, Ruins on the heights. — Cyclopean waUs, §. 166. G. A. Guattani, Mon. Sabini V. I. R. 1827. 8vo. 260. In Lower Italy the district skirting the gulf of Pute- oli gives evidence not merely of the earlier Hellenic culture, but also of the magnificence and luxury of the Romans. As the Romans themselves sought at Neapolis the enjoyment of a free and comfortable HeUenic life, and willingly allowed the remains of it to continue, so also both worlds of art come here in contact in the ruins and tombs. But the most dis tinct view of ancient artistic culture, in the first century of the Christian era, is furnished by the cities which were buried by Vesuvius. Although here many a deviation may be de duced from earlier Hellenic influences and still subsisting Oscan nationality, we find, nevertheless, in the main, every thing analogous to the taste of the Roman capital, and if we mark out and fill up the features which Rome presents on a large scale, but more faintly' in accordance with the detailed aspect of Pompeii, we can form to ourselves a very accurate and animated picture of life at that time. — Northern Italy furnished a host of scattered ruins and mines of statues; the greatest number is to be found at Verona. 1. Rehfues Gemahlde von Neapel und seinen Umgebungen, 3 Th. 1808. Mormile, Descr. della cittk di Nap. et dell' antichitk di Pozzuoli 278 GEOGRAPHY OF ANCIENT ART, con le figure degli edificj e con gU epitafj che vi sono, N. 1670. Pozzu oli (Dicsearchia, PuteoU) rich in antiquities. Franc, ViUamena, Ager Puteolanus s, prospectus ejusdem insigniores, R, 1620, 4to, P. Ant. PaoU Avanzi delle antich. esist. in PozzuoU, Cuma e Baise. N. 1768. fo. Le antich. di Pozz., Baise e Cuma inc. in rami da P. Morghen. N. 1769. fo. Jorio, Guida di Pozzuoli. Serapeum, a monopteral temple with medicinal springs and numerous ceUs for incubation, probably built after the pattern of the Canobian temple (in Memphis also the Serapeum was at the same time a sanatory institution, Beuvens, Lettres k Mr. Letr. iii, p. 83, in the same way as at St. Oannart in the south of France), according to Andr. Jorio's work on the temple of Serapis, Kunstbl. 1824, n. 19. An older plan by Brdmannsdorf Amphitheatre, aqueduct, piscina, tombs. The so-caUed temples of Venus and Diana (probably bath-haUs), the piscina admirabilis, and other objects at Bai.si. [In the street of tombs at Pu teoU which is but Uttle known, there have been many laid open of late years, with fine wall paintings, and others remarkable for their construc tion and design.] A theatre at Misbnum. Circus or amphitheatre of CuMiE. Tomb with the supposed skeletons (§. 432). On the grotto of the sibyl at Cumse especially Jorio, Viaggio di Enea aU' Inferno, [Gen eral opinion, as it seems, places it wrongly ; it is close by the acropoUs of the oldest Cumas, spacious, with a high stair hoUowed out in the side wall, and leading up to a narrow seat ; the temple of ApoUo probably stood on a pinnacle of rock in the neighbourEood.] Galleries in Posilip- po, §, 190, R, 1. ii. Rob, PaoUni, Mem. sui monumenti di antich. e di beUe arti ch'esist, in Miseno, in Baoli, in Baja, in Cuma, in Capua ant,, in Brcolano, in Pompeji ed in Pesto, N. 1812, 4to, Capua, amphitheatre. [Rucca Capua Vetere o sia descr, di tutti i mon, di C. ant, e particol, del suo amfit. Nap. 1828,] On the discoveries in Capri, Hadrava, Ragguagli di vari scavi e sco perte de antich, fatte neU' isola di Capri, N, 1793. 8vo. [1794. 4to.] Gori's Symbolse Utter. Decad. Rom. V. iii. p. 1. (Flor. 1748. vol. 1.) Ruins of a temple (?) in Pandataria. 2. The first discoveries which pointed to the buried cities were : the finding of the famous female statues (§. 199. R. 7) on the property of prince Blbeuf Emanuel of Lorraine, in the area of the theatre of Her culanum, about 1711 ; the discovery of the so-called house of Arrius Diomedes on the street of sepulchres at Pompeii when sinking a well, 1721 ; then the more fruitful discoveries at Herculanum, at the erection of a cheateau for Charles IIL, 1736. Herculanum, which is buried to a great depth, and whose forum lies under Resina, can only be explored like a mine, by means of shafts ; Pompeii, on the other hand, which was but sUghtly covered, can be laid quite open. However, it was, for this very reason, especiaUy after it was covered the first time with ashes, mostly despoUed of the more valuable objects by the excavations of the earUer inhabitants themselves. In the time of the French, the zeal which had almost become dormant received new life, and the excavation of the forum was undertaken. The more recent investigations began, after the forum was laid open, at the arch near the temple of Jupiter in the forum, and foUow the streets leading northward from thence (Temple of Portuna, Baths, FuUonia, House of the Tragic poet. House of the Faun). ARCHITECTURAL RBIMAINS IN UPPER ITALY. 279 More recent works §, 190, R, 4, 210, R, 3, Besides these, on Herou- l.\.num : Venuti, Descr. deUe prime scopSrte deU' ant. citt&, di Brcolano. 1748. Works containing accounts, by Cochin and BelUcard, de Correvon, Ant. Fr. Gori, Winckelmann, Cramer. (Rosini) Dissertat. Isagog. ad Ilercul. Velum, explanationem. Bayardi, Prodrome deUe antich. d'Erc. N. 1752. Le antich. di Brcolano. N. 1757—92. i— iv. vii. Pitture, v. vi. Bronzi, vui. Lucerne etc. (Extract in German by Murr with outlines by KiUan.) Antiquites d'Herculanum, grav. par Th. Piroli et publ. par F. et P. Piranesi. P. 1804 — 6. 6 vols. 4to. On Pompeii : an interesting List by Weber, 1757. Ann. d. Inst. ii. p. 42. M. I. 16. Martini Das gleichsam wieder aufiebende Pompeii, Leipz. 1779. 8vo. Gaetano, Pros- petto dei Scavi di Pompeii, 8vo. Millin, Descr. des Tombeaux, qui ont 6te deoouv. k Pomp. Pa. 1812. RomaneUi, Viaggio da Pomp, a Pesto. N. 1817. 2 vols. 8vo. Choulant, De locis Pompei. ad rem medicam facient. Lips. 1823. Cockburn, Pomp. L. 1818. Sumptuous work by Coldicutt. L. 1825. Bonucci, Pompei decrite. N. 1828. Later information in Nico- lini's M. Borbon, in Jorio, SugU Scavi di Brcolano. N. 1827, and in the accounts in Schorn's Kunstblatt, 1826. N. 36. 1827. N. 26. [in the yearly RagguagU de' lavori deUa r. Accad. Ercol. by AvelUno since 1833.] Jorio Plan de Pomp, et Remarques sur les edif N. 1828. Large map by Bibent. Guarini, on some monuments at Pompeu. Catalogue of works on Here. and Pomp, in the M. Borbon. i. p. 1. [Excavations Bull. 1834. p. 145. from 1835 — 38 by H. W. Schulz AnnaU d. Inst. x. p. 145, continued in the BuU. 1841-42. B. Rochette Lettre k Mr. Salvandy P. 1841.] Bbneventum, Triumphal arch, §. 191, R, 1, Vita, Thes, Antiqu. Ben- eventanarum, B, 1754. T, i, (Roman antiquities,) 3, In Umbria: Ocriculum, very considerable ruins; bridge, theatre, amphitheatre, several temples. Excavations in 1777, Guattani M, I. 1784. p. 1 sqq. Nabnia, a beautiful bridge, of the Augustan period. A sisiuM, ancient temple, Maria deUa Minerva, Corinthian, of elegant de sign. G, AntoUni, Opere T. i. 2, Guattani 1786, p, xx. Gothe Werke xxvu. s, 186. Theatre, amphitheatre, circular temple. Supposed temple of Clitumnus, Schorn's Travels, s, 462, R, Venuti, Osserv, sopra il fiume Clitumno etc, R. 1753, 4to, Fbrbnto, in the district of Viterbo, a gate of the same description as the axxixi, Annali d, Inst, ix, 2. p, 62. Tuder, so-caUed temple of Mars. Memoirs by Agretti and others, Giom, Arcad, 1819. ui. p. 3. FuLGiNiuM, Pontano, Disc, sopra I'antichitk della cittk di Foligno. Per. 1618. 4to. Fanum, Triumphal arch of Augustus, and an other of Constantine. Ariminum, §. 190. R. 1. i. Fine bridge. Thorn. Temanza, Antichitk di Rimini. V. 1740. fo. In Bthuria, Uttle of conse quence belonging to the Roman period. Amphitheatre at Abretium (Lor. Guazzesi in the Diss, dell' Ace. di Cort. T. ii. p. 93) and at other places. In Picenum : Ancona, §. 191. R. 1. Peruzzi, Diss. Anconitane. Bol. 1818. 4to, Amphitheatre of Faleria, Giom. Arcad. Iv. p, 160, Theatre of Fallerone in the March of Fermo BuU. 1836, p, 131, In Upper Italy : Ravenna, §, 194. R, 5. Patavium, Ruins of a Co rinthian temple (Ant, Noale, DeU' antichissimo t. scoperto in Pad, negli anni 1812 e 1819, Pad. 1827), Verona, the immense amphitheatre, Maffei, DegU Amfiteatri, Desgodetz, Les 6dif, ch, 22, On new excava tions, Giulari, Relazione degU escavamenti etc, V, 1818, 8vo, Arcus 280 GEOGRAPHY OP ANCIENT ART, Gavu et Gavias. Many other Roman buildings, §, 193, R, 7, Excavation, BuU, 1837. p, 173. A temple ofMinerva etc. in the neighbourhood, ibid. p. 137. [Modena and neighbourhood. Bull. 1846. p. 23. 1842. p. 145. 1843. p. 151. 1844. p. 178.] Brixia. Ottavio Bossi, Le Memorie Bres- ciane. Br. 1693. 4to. New discovery of a temple and large bronze figures. Dr. Labus, Antologia 1824. n. 43. [Labus intorno vari ant. mon. scop, in Brescia, Relaz. del prof R. Vantini, Brescia 1823. 4to. Fort. Benigni Lettera sui scavi falti nel circondario dell' antica Treja. Mace- rata 1812. 4to. 12 tav. In the court-house at Macerata 2 rows of sta tues, togati, one at FoUgno, called .Esculapius, and in most towns some remnant of antiquity. Vari mon. dell' Italia (Milan, Brescia, Verona, Vicenza), Annali xi. p. 181.] Monti Escav. Bresciane. Velleja, a Forum. AntoUni, Le rovine di VeUeja misurate e disegn. Mil. 1819. fo. Amalthea i. s. 331. The monuments have for the most part been taken to Parma. [Excavations, BuU. 1842. p. 175. 1843. p. 161.] Mediolanum, P. Gratidius, De prseclaris Mediolani sedificiis quse Aenobarbi cladem (1162) antecesserunt. Med. 1735. 4to. On the 16 columns near S. Loren zo, a treatise by GrUlon 1812. Amati, Les antiq. de la viUe de Milan. Mil. 1821. and Succinte Mem. intorno le sedici ant. col. Mil. 1831. fol. [From a bath-haU, Archaol. Zeit. 1846, §, 389.] Aosta, §. 190. R. l.'u. Susa, ibid. Millin's Voy. en Savoie, en Piemont, k Nice et k Gfenes. P. 1816. His Voyage dans le Milanois, Plaisance, Parme etc. P. 1817. Aquileja. Bertoli, Le antich. d'AquUeja profane e sagre. Ven. 1739. fo. The three last vols, with the drawings lie unprinted in the possession of a private gent, at Venice ; among them is the complete set of sUver plate of the family of the Busebii in the time of Constantine.] Forum Julii, Museum of native objects. [Excavations, Bullett. 1836. p. 213. Antiquities of Pola, amphitheatre, temple of Roma and Augustus, arch of the Sergu in the Antiq. of Athens vol, iv. Stancovich DeUa anfiteatro di Pola. Venez. 1822. 8vo. Alason, Pictures and Views of the Antiq. of Pola 1819 fol.] 261. It is proper that the information regarding museums with which we shall follow up the topographical details, should begin with Rome. With the prodigious riches of her soil Rome has acquired, especially through the wise regulation which prohibits works of ancient art from being carried away with out the sanction of the government, public museums with which it will be long ere any others can vie in abundance of excellent and well-preserved objects, however rich Munich and the British Museum may be in rare and valuable works from Rome — an abundance compared with which all descrip tion must remain imperfect, and which must often cause the most interesting specimens to run the risk of being overlooked. On the other hand, the best days of private collections are over, the most distinguished have become ornaments partly of Italian and partly of foreign capitals. In Northern Italy Florence has been enriched by the Villa Medicis and Etruria, and Ve nice principally by acquisitions from Greece, but also from the neighbourhood and from Rome ; all other collections have been deprived of such sources. But Naples [in addition to MUSEUMS IN ROME, 281 the Farnesian] has superabundant native treasures, which are naturally concentrated there, and secure to that capital, next to Rome, an independent importance, and an interest lor which no other collection can furnish an equivalent. 1, 60,000 statues or antiquities at Rome have been spoken of, nay, Lanzi goes as far as 170,000. OberUn, p, 127. Jacobs in loco. s. 616. — The general works on antiquities at Rome by Cavalieriis and others, v. §. 37. Less important : Borioni, CoUectanea Antiq. Rom. with explana tions by Rod. Venuti 1735, mostly bronzes. Antiquitatis Monumenta Rom. coUecta et iUustr. a Conyers Middleton. L. 1745, — Ramdohr Ueber Mahlerei u. BUdhauerarbeit in Rom, 1787, 3. Thle 8vo. Lumisden, Re marks on the Antiq. of Rome, 1797. 4to, Gerhard, Roms antike Bild werke, in the Beschreibung Roms, i. s, 277 — 356. Statues in pubUc places at Rome : before the Capitol M, Aurelius, the two basalt Uons, the dioscuri (not exceUent) ; the horse-tamers on Monte CavaUo ; Pasquino and Marforio (a river-god, and Ajax with Patroclus. Notizie di due famose statue di un fiume e di Patroclo. R, 1789.) [Bo- nada Anthol, Diss, i. 1, simulacrorum in urbe antiquitas.] Collections. I. Public a. In the Capitol ; Museum CapitoUnum ; founded by Clement XII., enlarged by Benedict XIV. and other popes. Chief work §. 38. Rich in hermse of philosophers and the Uke. Palace of the Conservatori. [Platner in the Beschr. Roms iii, 1. s. 107 ff. The Capit. M. S. 137—268. Perd. Mori ScuRure del M. Capitol. 2 T. R. 1806. 7. 4to.] b. In the Vatican : M. Pio-Clementinum ; opened by Clement XIV. by means of his trea surer Braschi, who as Pius VI. greatly enlarged it. Principal work, §. 38. Comp. Zoega's remarks in Welcker's Zeitschr. i. s. 310. 373 ff. M. Chiara monti added by Pius VII. §. 38. The Nuovo braccio constitutes a fur ther enlargement, comp. Kunstbl. 1825. N. 32. (One of the newest acquisitions is the coUection of the duchess of Chablais, with Bacchian sculptures from Tor Marancia on the Via Appia, Gerhard, Hyperb. Rom. Studien. s. 101). [L. Biondi I, Mon, Amaranziani 1843. fol, 50 tav. 142 s, — Additions, see Gerhard in the Kunstbl, 1825. s. 127 f ] The magazines also of the Vatican contain important objects [which have been now for the most part transferred to the new Lateran Museum. This museum was intrusted to father Secchi to pubUsh]. Fea, Nuova descr. de' mon. ant. ed oggetti d'arte nel Vaticano e nel Campidoglio. R. 1819. 12mo. Gerhard and Platner, The Vat. Mus. in the Beschr. Boms ii, 2. s. 1-283. Musei Etrusci quod Gregor. XVI. in Aed. Vat. constituit mon, P, 1, 2. R. 1842 f. m, Comp, H, Brunn, in the Kunstbl, 1844, N, 75 ff. It con tains the coUection of General Galeassi, one of the richest collections of gold ornaments, bronzes, clay figures, especiaUy painted vases. The D'Agincourt coUection of terracottas and a great number of Roman sculptures are in the casino in the gardens. 282 GEOGRAPHY OP ANCIENT ART, c. In the Colleoium Romanum : M. Kircherianum, pubUshed by Bonnani, R, 1709, fol. M, Kirch. ^Erea iUustr. notis Contucci. R. 1763-65, 2 vols, fol, [Increased by Pater Marchi with rare bronze articles, and especiaUy in the now very complete coUection of oes grave.} II. Private Collections (comp, Vasi and the List in Winckel mann, Werke, Bd. vii.). Albani, Palace and viUa (§. 258. R, 6), which were fiUed with trea sures of art by the Cardinal Alex, Albani, and of which Winckelmann (M. I.) and Zoega (Bassir,) especially have made use. There is a cata logue. Memoirs by Raffei ; Marini's Inscr. ViUse Alban. Many things are now gone to Paris and Munich, but stiU much remains, [StiU one of the richest museums in the world and the finest of aU, Indicazione antiquaria per la V, Albani ed. 2. in Rome 1803, by Fea. Beschr. Roms iii, 2. s. 455—566.] BoRSHESE, Palace and villa. The treasures of the viUa were purchased by Napoleon, and therefore remained at Paris : new ones however are now collecting there again. Sculture del palazzo deUa viUa Borghese detta Pinciana, R. 1796. 2 vols. 8vo. Mon, Gabini deUa viUa Pinciana descr. da Visconti. R. 1797. in 8vo. Visconti's lUustrazioni di Mon. Scelti Borghesiani, edited by Cher, de Rossi and Stef Piale. 1821. 2 vols. large fo. [Beschr. Roms iii, 3. s. 230 — 57. (Canina) Indicaz. deUe opere aut. di scolt. esist. nella v. Borghese. R. 1840. Beschr. Roms iii, 3. 1842. s. 230 — 57., the recently united and enlarged coUection. A. Nibby Mon. Scelti di V. Borghese. R. 1832. 8vo. maj.] Barberini, Palace. Much has gone to England, the greatest part to Munich. Tetii MAea Barberinse. R. 1647. fo. A portion now in the Sciarri palace [in cellars]. Gerhard Prodromus, s. xv. Some things still remain. Mattbi, Palace and villa. Mon. Mattheiani UI. a Rud. Venuti cur. I. Cph. Amadutio. R. 1776-79. 3 vols. fo. The best of it in the Vatican [several statues, busts, and bas reliefs which had come to Cardinal Pieschi, together with the two friezes from the palace of S. Croce, and two mar ble chairs from the palace DeUa Valle were sold by auction at Paris in June 1816]. Giustiniani, Palace, the antiquities are mostly dispersed. Galeria Giustiniana. R, 1631. 2 vols, fo, [The first collection at Rome, a part of which was disposed of by public auction,] Farnese, Palace ; viUa on the Palatine, Farnesina in Trastevere. All the antiquities now at Naples. [A good number still remain in the palace, and some of these of considerable value.] Ludovisi, the exceUent sculptures of this villa seem to be stiU there [aU stiU. Beschr. Boms iii, 2. s. 677-91. Capranesi Description des Sculpt. aric. de la V. Ludovisi, Rome 1842. AU the mon. have been extremely well designed by Riepenhausen for B. Braun]. Medicis, Villa. The most valuable objects taken to Florence about 1770. MUSEUMS IN ROME, 283 [CoLONNA, Beschr, Roms iii, 3, s, 170 ff,] Negroni, ViUa. The antiquities bought up by Jenkins, the famous dealer in works of art ; the best in the Vatican. Aldobrandini, VUla, now MioUis. [Indice de sculture e della galleria — MioUis 1814. 4to.] Work by A. Visconti, [Corsini, Beschr. Roms iii, 3. s, 604 ff. Rospigliosi.] Panfili, ViUa; statues and busts. Villa PamphUia ejusque palatium, R, fo. There are still [very] many things in it ; also in the Casino Pan fiU, [Torlonia. P, Vitale Marmi acolp. esist, nel pal. di Giov. Torlonia Duca di Braociano 3 T. Rom. 8vo. Beschr. Roms iu, 3. s. 155 f.] Villas Altieri, Casali, Strozzi [Massimo], and many others. Palaces Braschi, Rondanini, RuspoU (many things from these in Munich). Col lections of Thorwaldsen, Kestner, BoUard, and others. Magazines of VescovaU, and others. [The Rondanini ooU. was distributed among the heirs, every thing good in the Braschi was sold, part now in the Lateran Mus., some good works in the pal. Massimi aUe Colonne, Chigi, Spada, the 8 basr. in B. Braun's Zwolf Basr. E. 1845 fol. The newest coll. of any importance is that of Cav. Campana, the richest of aU in gold articles and terracottas, rich also in curious vases, bronzes, .oyxleg, of which Thucyd. makes frequent mention, were coUected by the Xi%7^oyoi (Valken. Opusc. T, ii. p, 288, Ruhnken ad. Tim. p. 175). The opus incertum in its widest sense embraces the primitive Cyclopean architecture, §, 45, Comp. Klenze, Amalthea iii, s, 104 ff. 3. On 7^7iiv%g especially the inscription from the temple of M, Polias, Bockh, C. I. i. p. 273, Isodomum is explained by the signification of hofiog, corium, a horizontal layer of stones. The emplectum is a conjunc tion of the isodomum in the frontes and diatoni (facing and tye waUs) with the incertum as filUng up. 4. See above §. 46. 49. 80. 153. The stones of the architrave iu the temple of Cybebe at Sardis are 17| f to 23,^ t. in length, 4^ t. high. Leake, Asia Minor p. 344 sq. In the Propylsea of Athens, stone beams of 17 and 22 feet in length. Topogr. of Athens, p. 180 sq. The Untel of the door of the opisthodomos of the Parthenon 26 ft, 6 in, A xptx^ixlog hi^og §, 105, (xxxg xpi.x^o'Tr^.r&'/ig Bur. Phoen, 1175), fiUed an entire wag- 302 ARCHITECTONICS, gon. Also in Roman buildings, bridges and arches, the single stones often appear as powerful and significant members of the body. Of the triUthon at Balbec there are to be seen stones as much as 60 feet in length, Richter, WaUfahrten s. 87. — Mausolus' palace was according to Pliny xxxvi, 6, the first example of a brick building incrusted with a marble facing. 5. See above §. 46. 106, clamps and dovetails were caUed to'j^o/ (Expl. of Diod. u, 7), or yoptipoi ; and are often stiU to be met with at Rome, As to the model of a waU, exempla Vitruv. x, 22. 6. On turning, Klenze, Amalth. iii. s. 72. Sawing (Plin. xxxvi, 9) was of great service in the preparation of marble tiles, §. 63, 2; hence this art was invented by a Naxian. 270. Secondly: Wood — ^the material most easily obtained and wrought, and hence of such influence on the form of the earliest temple-architecture. It retreated in public architec ture more and more into the ceiling (in the Athenian temples even that was of stone), and from that into the rafter-work of the roof, until it was even expelled thence by the prevalence of the vault On the other hand, joisting remained at Athens (not so at Alexandria, §. 149) the ordinary mode of construc tion in private buildings of minor importance. 1. V. §. 52 and comp. the Tuscan temple §. 169. In the temple of Ephesus the roof was of cedar (Plin. xvi, 79), the lacunaria of cypress, Vitruv. ii, 9, Hence the conflagration §. 80. R, i, 1. Chief members of the rafter-work : tigna, main beams ; columen s. cul- men, ridge-piece ; cantherii, rafters ; templa, purUnes ; asseres, laths (deUcise, Pestus ; deUcise perhaps cantherii angulares). PoU. x, 167. hoxoi, Zoxiheg, ix^ix, ar^ar^^eg, xxXvpApixrix — ix^iarii^sg. On timber for buUding (^materia) Vitruv, ii, 9, PaUad, xii, 15, Abies, quercus, esculus, cupressus, larix, alnus, etc, 271, Thirdly: as to soft masses which were treated in a plastic manner, clay formed into bricks and either dried in the air or burnt was used for public buildings especially in Lydia, Egypt and Babylon, but also in Greece and afterwards at Rome. Slacked lime combined with sand, or, in Italy, with volcanic Pozzolana (Puteolanus pulvis), was employed as mor tar in joining stones, and also as a preparation for pavement and similar purposes ; lime, gypsum, marble dust and the like were used for plaster (tectorium, xovioieig) — in preparing which the ancients showed much skill and care, — for stucco- work (albarium opus), &c. 1. The waUs of Mantinea were of brick (on a stone plinth, Xen. HeU. V, 2, 5), as were also the old waUs of Athens on the south (HaU. ALZ. 1829. N. 126), several buildings at Olympia (brick-ruins), aU sorts of small temples in Pausanias, Croesus' palace at Sardis, that of Attains at TraUes, and that of Mausolus at HaUcarnassus. Tiles IJ foot long, 1 ft. SIMPLE GEOMETRIC FUNDAMENTAL FORMS. 303 broad, were caUed Lydion, certainly because they wore in use in Lydia. Baking tiles was called vxiv^ovg 'eXxvvsiv. It came from Babylon to Lydia. The ancient tUes are generally broader, and thinner in proportion than ours, PoU, X, 157, xxXvTir^^eg KooivSliov^ytig. x, 182, xi^xfiog ariyxarrig. In Italy old brick waUs at Arretium, a metropolis of the plastic art, and Mevania. In ancient Rome buildings were usually composed of brick walls on a plinth of stone, Varro in Non, s, v. suffundatum. On account of the limited space, thin stone walls were afterwards introduced in private buUdings, when they would be too weak if made of bricks to bear the numerous stories, Vitruv. ii, 8, Country buildings were made of unburnt bricks and clay, Agathius ii, 16, The Romans likewise borrowed from Carthage walls of trodden clay (pise), 2, Pozzolana (an earthy tuff-wack) was also of great importance in laying foundations, especially in water, and in rubble vaults, as in the baths. But even in Grecian buUdings in the water, as the harbour wall of Clazomense, the mortar appears very firm as if vitrified. De la Faye, Recherches sur la preparation que les Rom. donnaient ^ la chaux. P. 1777. Old investigations by Vicat, Rech. experimentale sur les chaux. Bad mortar also occurs. 3. Bubble walls, but very carefully plastered, are most common in Pompeii, §. 190. R. 4. In the house of the Faun there are sheets of lead between the waU and the plaster. Similar waUs in Greece, for instance a temple of Poseidon at Anticyra, Xoyxaiv ^xolopAripiivog TiiBotg, xexovixrxi ii rd ivrog. Pans. X, 36, 4. 272. Fourthly: Metal. In the early Greek times it was 1 employed especially in decorating and facing, but also, as it seems, in the internal construction of buildings ; it afterwards disappeared from the essential members of architecture, until it came to be used again in the Roman period more for roof- 2 ing, especially in vaults of great span. 1. Above, §. 47 — 49. Prisci Umina etiam ac valvas ex aere in tempUs factitavere, PUn. xxxvi, 7. ApoUon. Rh. iii, 217. ^^lyxog icpv^e^Sie lopcoio T^xtvfog j(;otA«£5j(7/i/ £7ri yXv}, 3/a^w^a. A. Doric: 1. triglyphs over all the columns and intercolumniations (accord ing to Eustratius ad Aristot. Ethic, ad Nicom. x, 4, 2. Zell. //,outXov); in these are to be distinguished the femora {m^o'', fillets), canaliculi, channels, semicanaliculi and a capitulum; 5 2, metopae, metopes. B. Ionic and Corinthian, called zophorus from the reliefs of metal or marble attached to the plain sur face (rows of figures, bucrania with wreaths of flowers or other 6 arabesque - like ornaments) with a cymatium above. The Doric frieze by its composition recals the original destination of that member (§. 52) ; at the same time the triglyphs, by their upright position and separation, continue the vertical tendency of the columns, and impart an enlivening contrast to the entablature, which is only at length completely resolved into horizontal extension in the cornice. In the Ionic archi tecture the frieze is more an ornament of the building, with- 7 out the essential significance of the Doric. III. Cornice. A. Doric: 1. Cymatium Doric. 2. Corona, ys/iroi/, projecting oblique ly on all sides, but terminating perpendicularly, and beneath it, over all the triglyphs and metopes, the mutules (mutuli) from which hang the guttse; 3. a second cymatium; 4. the 8 sima with the lion-heads above the columns. B. Ionic: 1. denticuli, dentels with the intersectio, iJjiroy(ri, the interdentels ; 2. a cymatium; 3. corona, with concave under profile; 4. cymatium; 5. sima, C. Corinthian, similar to the Ionic, only that under the corona the modillions, ancones or mutuli, whose form is a composition of volutes and acanthus leaves, 9 act as supports. In each order proportionate height, strength and simplicity are signs of early antiquity ; contraction of the plain surfaces, a narrower and thinner form, as well as richer decoration, are indications of a later period. 2. Guttse in a continued row without triglyphs were not perfectly rare in antiquity — in the pronaos of Rhamnus, the tower of Cyrrhestes, the Cyrensean tombs (Pacho, pi. 19. 40. 46.). 4. Triglyphs were also employed as ornaments of castle-walls, as on the acropolis of Athens; see §. 52. R. 3. 272. R. 1. and Epicharmus in Athenseus vi. p. 236 b. When they are above columns, the corner tri glyphs must be advanced beyond the axis of the column — an irregularity in a great measure compensated by the contraction of the last inter- columniation, which is grounded in static and optical laws; but with many Roman architects it was a reason for rejecting the whole order. In early times the triglyphs were always painted blue (cserulea cera, Vitruv.), Brondsted, Voy, ii, p, 145. 5. The oldest Ionic architecture had certainly the dentels immedi ately above the architrave, for instead of the heavy cross-beams of the CEILING, ROOF. 313 Doric roof only light joists were laid upon the slender columns, forming the dentels on the outside. This arrangement is first found in the ori ental form of Ionic architecture (comp. §. 64. 244), at Persepolis, at Tel missus and in Phrygia (§. 241.* R. 3), and then in the haU of the Cary atides at Athens. ' E'^riarvXiov xxi 0 i^r xvroij xonpi^og specially consecrated C. I. n. 2751. 52. 53. 7. 8. Vitruvius derives the mutules from the projection of the rafters, the dentels from the jutting out of the laths (comp. §. 270) ; against this just objections have often been made. The mutuli in the Corin thian order appear to have been with him a sort of modUUon. \ Modil- Uons are very appropriately called ¦x-^ofiox^i C. I. 2297. 283. The simplest ceiling, a stone laid across, is only met I with in monuments of the most unpretending kind. Temples and other sumptuous edifices had sunken panels, lacunaria, parvti/iara, which were transferred from wood-work, which was also inlaid with gold and ivory, to stone (§. 53.) The 2 ancients distinguish: 1. the beams lying immediately over the architrave {boxol dou^odoxoi) ; 2. the narrower joists placed above these and mortised into one another (called o-rgwr^gsj collec tively, singly probably epnxiexoi and i/jLavng) ; 3. the covers or caps filling the openings, xuXu/j^/j^dna: which parts were also imitated in stone-building, but then wrought more as a whole. 1. 'Ogo(p5) (pxrvxig lixysyTiVftpiivn Diodor. i, 66. Chryselephantine lacunaria are even described by Ennius, Androm. p. 35. Bothe, as a part of the ancient kingly magnificence. In Diod. iu, 47. cpix'Kxi Xi^oxi^.'h.riroi are mentioned as an ornament of the cassoons. Laquearu as a distinct class of artists in the Theodos. Cod. xiu. t. 4, 2. — The space between the lacunaria and the roof often occurs as a place of concealment. Comp. Appian de B. C, iv, 44. Tacit. A. iv, 68. Valor, Max. vi, 7, 2. 2. See especially PoUux x, 173, and the investigations in Bockh 0, I. p. 281, comp, p, 341. The more accurate view which the Uned. Ant. of Attica give of the lacunaria of Attic temples must be considered in connexion therewith. In the Eleusinian propylsea the "ioxoi are placed over the Ionic architrave of the interior, and the stone fiags with their depressed panels are mortised directly into these. But in Rhamnus and Sunium these stone flags are so cut out as to leave square holes into which the xx'Kvpcpi.xrix exhibiting the inner panels are fitted. It is pre cisely the same in the SeUnuntine temple, tbe lacunaria of which with their coloured ornaments are given by Hittorff, pi. 40. 284. In private buildings the roof was either laid on fiat I (that is with slight inclination), or inclined on all sides, slanting; in public buildings, on the other hand, especially temples, it was provided with pediments at the ends, which among the Greeks were generally an eighth of their breadth in height, but were more elevated among the Romans. To 2 the pediment or fronton, fastigium, aerog, airmiMa (comp. §. 53) belong 1. the tympanum ; 2. corona and sima above the tym- 314 ARCHITECTONICS. panum; 3. antefixa, ornaments at the corners, and on the summit; 4. acroteria, angularia et medianum, pedestals for statues at the corners and in the middle. The sloping sides of the roof consist of 1. tegulae, flat tiles, xaXwjrrrjgeg, and 2. imbrices, hollow tiles — of marble, clay or bronze — which were ingeniously fitted into one another. The rows of the latter closed with upright elegantly ornamented eave-tiles, frontati, imbrices extremi, which in Grecian temples were not only placed above the cornice but even ran along the top of the ridge as an elegant ornament. 1. In ^qSx (on vase-paintings) the favourite practice was to change the dsrog of the ie^x (comp. Aristoph. Birds, 1109) into a low arch ornamented with fieurons stuck upon it. Perhaps these are Vitruvius' semifastigia. 2. The sima as well as the obUquely overhanging corona are not, if we look to their destined object, suitable for the side of the pediment, but are applied throughout for the sake of the agreement of forms. In the small temple of Artemis at Eleusis, where the sima has a very fine profile, it stands more upright over the fronton and inclines forward more above the side-walls, which is not less fitting than agreeable. Beautiful aetoma in a sepulchral monument at Bpidauros, with two different kinds of eave-tiles, hewn out in marble. The antefixa (the author's Etrusker ii. p, 247) we become acquainted with especiaUy from vase-paintings where temples and heroa are seldom without them, -For example, MUlingen, Vases de div, coll, pi, 12, 19, MiUin, Vases u, pi, 32, 33, Tombeaux de Canosa, pi. 3. 4. 7. 8. 11. 14, Antefixa of steles, resembUng eave-tUes with the usual flower ornament, Stackelberg Graber Tf 3, 4, Pretty stele of Theron with painted ante- fixum thereon, in Attica, ibid, Tf 6, 2, Painted sarcophagus tUes ibid. 5, 2. 6, 1. The acroteria were for the most part narrower in Greece than in Rome where the pediments of the temples were often ornamented above with numerous statues. See for example the coins of the Tiber with the temple of Concordia, Pedrusi, vi, 4, 1. C. I. n. 2388, 6. xxi vtjov S 'e^rl x^xrl fiervio^ dyxXpt,xrx ^vixxv r^iaax, ovo i^ixxg, pceaax Bs Tlepffecpovriv, The conflict into which the front tiles over the cornice come with the sima was settled by the Attic architects generally in this way, that they merely placed a part of the sima with a lion's head at the corner beside the acroterium, and more rarely by carrying the front tiles further- back behind the sima, as in the temple of Artemis at Eleusis, or by leaving them away altogether. 285. Vaults, according to the development which this part of architecture received, especially in the Macedonian and Roman period (comp. §. 48. 49. 107. 109. R. 5. 110. 149. R, 3. 168. 170, R. 3, 190. sqq,), are divided into the leading kinds which lie in the nature of the thing, only that the pointed arch must have always remained foreign to ancient architecture (§. 195), whose character does not affect a tower like striving upwards and a mutual conflict of buttresses. KINDS OF BUILDINGS. 315 arches and vaults, but a predominating horizontal expansion, a secure position on the extended surface. Vaults are called fornicationes (cuneorum divisionibus), concamera- tiones (hypogeorum), Vitruv. vi, 11. Among the Greeks xipig, ipxxlg xxfi,j^ig) and the Euripus around; the encircling wall with the seat-rows (po dium et sedilia) and grand stands (suggestus et cubicula) ; to which was also added a portico with tabernse on the outside. 3 Amphitheatres, although they originated in Italy, are alto gether conceived in the simple and grandiose taste of the Hel lenic architects; the problem here was also more easy than in the theatre. The elliptic form which the arena universally received, gave the advantage of a longer line for sustained charges and pursuits; the locality lost thereby the uniformity of the circular surface which, everywhere presents equal advan- 4 tages. The parts of the amphitheatre are: 1. the arena with the subterranean passages and the equipments for the parti cular games ; 2. the foundation wall of the seats (podium) ; 3. the different stories (mseniana) of seat-rows (gradationes) with their stairs; 4. the different circular passages between the maeniana (praecinctiones) with the gates under the seats (vo- mitoria); 5. the higher and lower vaults and arcades (for- nices, concamerationes) over and alongside one another, which occupied the whole space under the seats; 6. the stories of columnar architecture on the outside; 7. the portico around the whole amphitheatre, above the highest meenianum ; 8. the uppermost gallery with the beams from which the awning (vela) was spread out by means of an immense apparatus of 5 ropes. As amphitheatres were sometimes filled with water, and th(! arena converted into a basin, there also originated at AMPHITHEATRES, PORTICOES. 323 Rome, from the insatiable passion of the people for public amusements, the Naumachije as a separate kind of buildings, which furnished larger surfaces for sea-fights in the interior. 1. This sphendone (Malalas, p. 307, ed. Bonn.) is seen very distinctly in the Bphesian stadium, where it is Ukewise separated from the rest of the race-course by a few projecting seats. The Messenian stadium, which is surrounded by colonnades, has 16 rows of seats in the sphen done. Exped. de la Moree, p. 27. pi, 24 sqq. In the Pythian stadium (described by Cyriacus Inscr. p. xxvu.) this is caUed by HeUodorus iv, 1. a ^ixr^ov. Several stadia in Asia Minor (Magnesia, TraUes, Sardis, Pergamon) are rounded off at both ends. Leake, Asia Minor, p. 244. 2. [The hippodrome at Aphrodisias Ion. Antiq. iii. ch. 2. pi. 10 sqq. That at Perga is also weU preserved. On the phiale (of the fountains) of the hippodrome at Constantinople, Texier Revue Arched, ii. p. 142.] The ornaments of the spina of the Roman Circus, among others the pulvinar, the scaffolds with eggs and dolphins, conic pyramids on a base, are partly derived from decursiones funebres, also from the worship of Poseidon [the pulvinar was for distinguished personages, the maenia- num, a stair to the different stories ; the Euripus prevented the runners from approaching the podium]. The Euripus as weU as the basin (lacus) of the spina (distinctly to be seen in the circus of CaracaUa and in mo saics) served to moisten the sand. — The Circus Max. at Rome was 2,100 feet long, 400 broad, and surrounded by galleries in three stories {aroxl rqiariyoi, Dion. Hal.) the lowest of which had stone, and the upper wooden seat-rows ; in Trajan's time it contained about 300,000 spectators, G, L, Bianconi's work, §, 258, R, 4, Mosaics, §. 424, R, 2. 3. The Greeks sometimes converted stadia into amphitheatres, Hirt, Gesch. u. s. 345. Lipsius de amphith., Thes, Ant, Rom, ix, p. 1269. Maffei degli Amfiteatri. Carli d. Anfiteatri (the Flavian, that of Italica and of Pola). MU. 1788. Fontana Anfit. Flavio (§. 190. R. 3). 1725. fo. Ruins of amphitheatres in Italy, §, 258, 260. R, BibUot, Ital, xU. p. 100. Comp. §. 254. 256. 262. 4. The recent excavations in the Coliseum have shown the subterra nean passages of the Arena. See Lor. Re, Atti d. Ace. archeol. ii. p. 125 (for Bianchi, against Fea). [The amphitheatre of Syracuse, CavaUari in Serradifalco iv. tv. 13-15, of Catania v. tv. 7-9 ; there is a large work on that of Capua prepared.] The sight of the amphitheatrical games in their strange combinations must have been wonderful, surprising and exciting to a degree which we cannot adequately imagine. The splendid decorations, the moveable ivory cylinders and gold nets for the protec tion of the podium, the gems on the balteus, i, e. the prsecinctiones, and the gilding of the porticoes are described especiaUy by Calpurnius, Eel. vii, 47 sqq. 5. In the Naumachia of Augustus the longer axis amounted to 1,800 (basin) and 100 feet (seats), the shorter 1,200 and 100 f. 291. Another class of buildings consists of porticoes des tined for public social intercourse, which the ancients loved so much, for commerce and all sorts of assemblies, in which a 324 ARCHITECTONICS. roof resting on columns and affording a shelter against wind and rain was the main object, whereas in temples it was merely an external appendage. To these belong first, entirely open porticoes of two or more rows of columns (tetrastichoe, pentastichoe), such as sometimes traversed cities in the form of streets, like the great colonnades of the Syrian towns (§. 149. R. 4. 192. R. 5), sometimes surrounded quadrangular mar ket-places and other squares; sometimes also they constituted distinct buildings by themselves. But then walls were also added to the colonnades on one or both sides, aud thus were developed the halls which Rome borrowed from Greece under the name of basilicas {sroai jSaaiXixai §. 180. R. 3. 188. : R. 3. 191. R. 1. 194.) Here we distinguish: three or five aisles running along parallel to one another, together with the galleries over the side-aisles, which were formed by columns disposed in pairs, the chalcidicum in front, and the tribunal in the posterior part of the building, frequently in a semicircular ) recess {-Myy^ri). — We shall content ourselves with merely men tioning other public edifices, as we can scarcely say anything general as to their construction, such as the Buleutbria or Cu- mm ; the Prytaneia of the Greeks with the Tholi or circular buildings which were destined for the state-sacrifices of the Prytanes; [the Ship-houses, vswg/a (Bockh Urkunden des At- tischen Seewesens s. 64 ff.) and Skeuothecae, the celebrated one of Philo in the Peirseus Olymp. 112. (Ibid. s. 71.)]; the pri sons, which were often very strong and resembled donjons ; the THESAURI (aeraria), in which subterranean cellar-like vaults seem even in later times to have been the principal thing [?]. 3 The numerous groups of Thesauri, which stood on platforms {xgrivTdec) in the temples of Delphi and Olympia, were also pro bably for the most part circular structures, 2, Thus for example there stood at Athens, according to Paus. i, 2, 4. several temples, a 'gymnasium and Polytion's house in a stoa, that is to say in a square enclosed by it. Of the same description was the portico of MeteUus, §, 180, R, 2. 190. R, 1, i. The portico of Thoricus (§. 109. R. 8,) shows no trace of walls, and was therefore perhaps a mere structure of columns ; so also for the most part the portico of Diocletian at Palmyra, Cassas i. pi, 93 sqq, — Comp, Hirt, Gesch, iii. s. 265. 3. The Corcyrsean Hall at Elis contained a wall between two rows of columns, Paus. vi, 24, 4. A CBYPTOPOETicns had walls with windows on both sides, and probably only engaged columns between. On hangins porticoes §. 149. R. 2. comp. §. 279. R. Forcellini s. v. mxnianum, solar ria, Mseniana, iiXixarri^ix, Salmasius Hist. Aug. i. p. 676. [Portico of the Agora at Aphrodisias, Ion. Ant. iii. ch. 2. pi. 6 sqq.] 4. We obtain a knowledge of the Basilicce especiaUy from that of Vitruvius at Fanum (in the description of which however there are stiU many obscurities,) that at Pompeii (Mazois iii. pi. 15. sqq. Gell, Pomp. GYMNASIA, THERMS. 325 New Ser. ch. 2.), the one at Ocriculum and those of the Christians. On the vestibule, which was called Chaioidioum, and was therefore derived from Chalcis, see Hirt ii. s. 266. Sachse's Stadt Rom. ii. s. 7. The Pom peian Chalcidicum however formed a separate peristyle with a crypto- porticus behind it. Becchi, del Calcidico e d. Cripta di Eumachia. N. 1820. Malalas has often the expression xoyxn. [oixixi voXv6^o(poi. Ja cobs ad Philostr. Imag. 4, 23.] 5. The Tholus of Athens was also called Skias (Suidas s. v. 'S.xii.g, C. I. p. 326.), and was therefore one and the same sort of building with the skias of Theodorus at Sparta, §. 66. R., only that the latter was large enough to contain assembUes of the people. Was the tholus qui est Delphis (de eo scripsit Theodorus Phocseus, Vitruv. vii. Prsef) the buleuterion of that place or a thesaurus 1 TraveUers frequently speak of a circular building there. — Welcker, Rhein. Mus. ii, 3. s. 469 ff., throws doubt on the idea brought forward § 48. regarding the ancient thesauri; but, in the first place, native tradition certainly designates distinctly the well known buUdings as the treasuries of Minyas and Atreus (the latter of which is even yet a xxrxyxiov oi'xnfix, as Pausanias calls it), and secondly, analogies are too much wanting in Greece to explain such domes contrary to tra dition to be sepulchres. See on these Dodwell, Views of Cyclop. Remains, pL 9. 10. 11. 13. 6. These buUdings (on the position of which see Paus. vi. 19, 1.) are called by Polemon Athen. xi. p. 479. vuoi, in Burip. Androm. 1096. xi^"""" yifiovrx yvx'h.x. The smaU buildings also which were designed to sup port prize-tripods were caUed vxoi (§. 108. R. 4), Plut. Nic. 3. Comp. also §. 232. R. 4. 292. Among the public buildings which were erected for the general care of the body, the Gymna.sia were in Greece, and the THERMiE in Rome, and probably even in the Mace donian East, the most important. They stand in close con nexion with one another, for, as in Greece the warm bath was attached to athletic exercises as a remedy for exhaustion, so in Rome some corporeal exercise was connected with the use of the bath. The Greek Gymnasia, in their complete ness, contained the following spaces and apartments: A. as parts of the main portion, the palsestra: 1. the stadion; 2. the ephebeion, the exercise-hall for the youths; 3. sphajris- terion, for ball-playing; 4. apodyterion, for undressing; 5. eleeothesion, aleipterion, for anointing; 6. konisterion, for rubbing with dust; 7. the swimming-bath {xoXui/jfinh^a) with other bathing accommodations; 8. covered promenades {^usroi, in Rome, portions stadiatae, stadia tecta); 9. open promen ades {'jre^ibio/ilbeg, in Rome, hypaethrae, ambulationes or xysti). B. as surrounding portions : all sorts of rooms (ceci), open halls (exedrae), porticoes (portions, also cryptoporticus), by means of which the gymnasium was also fitted to become a place of intellectual gymnastics. Now, in Thermae, we distinguish in a similar way: A. The main edifice, in which were, 1. the ephe- beum, the large circular hall in the centre of the whole; 2. 326 ARCHITECTONICS. the cold bath (balneum frigidarium) ; 3. the tepid (tepidar- ium); 4. the hot (caldarium); 5. the sweating-room often connected therewith (Laconicum sen sudatio concamerata, in which were the clypeus and the labrum, and the hypocaustum with the suspensura beneath) ; 6. the anointing-room (unctu- arium); 7. sphasristerium or coryceum; 8. apodyterium; 9. elseothesium; 10. conisterium; 11. the swimming-bath (pis cina); 12. xysti; 13. all sorts of apartments for attendants; 14. the vestibulum (all these chambers, except the vestibulum, ephebeum and piscina, are usually found double). B. sur rounding and enclosing structures such as otherwise belong especially to museums — porticoes, exedr®, apartments for learned intercourse (scholae) and libraries, also buildings in the form of theatres. 2. The best preserved ruins of gymnasia are at Ephesus (the most magnificent in Asia, built by Adrian, Philostr. Vit. Soph. 1. Polemo), Alexandria Troas and HierapoUs (drawings of the last by Cockerell). For carrying out into detail the above data from Vitruvius see Hirt. iii. s. 233 ff. Kruse Theagenes S. 131 ff. [Plan of the palsestra, Leake Tour in Asia, Appendix Note 3.] 4. In elder Greece and Rome the baths, fixf^xveix, were insignificant edifices and probably in general private undertakings. (PubUc Mvr^aveg however are mentioned by Xenophon, RP. Ath. 2, 10). In these a round and vaulted form was the usual one at Athens, Athen. xi. p. 501. But this form always continued to be that of the bath-haUs ; large windows in the dome admitted the Ught. Comp. Lucian's Hippias 5. Seneca Bp. 86. Statius Silv. i, 5, 45, Plin. Bp. ii, 17. Sueton. de ill. gramm. 9. 11. Comp. §. 194. R. 3. [Baths at Cnidos Ion. Ant. iii. ch. 1. pi. 12 sqq.] We know the construction of baths and thermse especiaUy from the picture found in the baths of Titus (Winckelm. W. u. Tf 4. Hirt, Tf 24, 2.), the thermse of Badenweiler (§. 264. R. 2.) and PompeU (M. Borb: ii, 49 sqq. Gell, Pomp. New Ser. i. pi. 23 sqq.), which are restricted to the necessary parts, and Palladio's plans of the baths of Agrippa, which however are not altogether to be relied on, the Nerono-Alexandrine, those of Titus (or Trajan?), of CaracaUa, Philip (1), Diocletian and Constantine, which in general present very distinctly the lavacra in modum provinci- arum extructa (Ammian). PaUadio, Terme de' Bom. dis. con giunte di Ott. Barotti Scamozzi. Vic. 1783 fo. [Vicence 1797. 4to.] Ch. Cameron, The Baths of the Bomans. L. 1772 fo. comp. §. 192. R. 1. 193. R. 6. Becker Gallus ii. S. 19. Kruse Theagenes S. 138. distinguishes the coryceum from the sphseristerium.— AUied to the baths were the ntmph.s!a, halls with high cupolas and fountains (Dissert. Antioch. i, 22.). 5. The Alexandrine museum (§. 149. R. 3) was a large peristyle with Ubrary and other rooms behind, and having a large dining-haU. Strab. xvii, p, 793, Aphthonius, p, 106, ed, Walz, Comp, J, Pr. Gronov and Neocorus, Thes. Ant. Grsec. vui. p. 2742 sqq. On the exedrse of the museums com bined with stoso, Gothofred. ad Theod. Cod. xv, 1, 53. But artificial sta- lactitic grottoes were likewise called museums, Plin. xxxvi, 42. Comp. Malalas, p, 282, ed, Bonn. [Large ruins at Sardes point at pubUc granaries.] PRIVATE HOUSES. 327 293. The design of private houses was of course at all 1 times dependent on the various wants of different ranks and trades, as well as the particular inclinations of the owners, and therefore less regulated by pervading rules than the public buildings; however, there are even here certain easily distin guishable leading forms. I. The primitive Greek house of 2 the anaktes (§. 47), to which may have corresponded in gen eral, even in later times, the designs of houses among those tribes of Greece who more faithfully adhered to the ancient customs. II. The design described by Vitruvius, which pro- 3 bably emanated from the lonians, and which was perfected in the Alexandrine times: A. the front porch for the door-keeper (^ugwgE/bt). B. The division for the men {avb^ovlrig), a peri style (with the Rhodian stoa towards the south), surrounded by apartments of all kinds, dining-rooms, rooms for the men's meals {dvb^meg), exedrae, libraries, cells for slaves, stables. C. 4 Division for the women {ywaixoivTrig), also in connexion with the front porch, with a small prostyle to itself and adjoining porch (wgoffrcbs or ira^aardg), rooms of all sorts, bed-chambers (the SaXa^og and d/ji,fi^dXa/j,og), cells and so forth. D. Cham bers for guests {^evmeg, hospitalia), as separate dwellings; in termediate courts {/iigauXoi) separated them from the main building. III. The Roman house, a combination of the later 5 Greek with the primitive Italian (§. 168. R. 5), which always continued to be pretty generally retained in the habitations of plain citizens; its parts: 1. Vestibulum; 2. atrium or cavas- dium, either Tuscan (without columns), or tetrastyle, or Corinthian, or vaulted (testudinatum) ; 3. Side-rooms of atrium (alae, tablina, fauces) ; 4. the peristyle ; 5. dining- rooms (triclinia, ccenationes, sestivee, hibernae) ; 6. halls (oeci, tetrastyli, Corinthii, .ffigyptii, Cyziceni); 7. conversa tion-saloons (exedras) ; 8. pinacothecae and bibliothecae ; 9. the bath with the paleestra ; 10. closets, bed-chambers (conclavia, cubicula, dormitoria); 11. store-rooms and work rooms for the slaves (cellae familiae) ; 12. the upper story called coenacula; 13. cellars (hypogea concamerata; 14. gar den buildings (viridaria, ambulationes). To the character of 6 the ancient house in general belongs external seclusion (hence few and high windows), and the open communication of the apartments of the house with one another, as they were built around inner courts from which they were immediately acces sible, often lighted merely through the open doors, and some times separated only by moveable wooden partitions (hence the tablinum) or curtains (vela). As to the country houses, 7 it is suflScient to remark that they are divided into villw rus- ticw, really designed in a way suitable to the life of a coun try gentleman, and urhance, which transferred the luxurious 328 ARCHITECTONICS. construction of the city into rural environment (of such there are not wanting minute descriptions). 1. A leading circumstance in the explanation of these structures is the Uttle necessity for carrying off smoke ; hence the want of chimneys. On the means of compensation comp. StiegUtz Arch. i. s. 124. Remains of ancient chimneys, Fea in Winckelm. W. ii. s. 347. Such were most usual in Gaul. Elsewhere heating by means of pipes in the wall and floor was a favourite method. 2. Comp, Dorians ii, p. 271 sq. At Athens an «i7n) before the house was usual even in later times; the women Uved mostly in the upper story, v'jre^^ov, liviqeg (Lysias Ap, for the murder of Eratosth. 9,), the maids in irvqyoi (Demosth, agt. Buerg. p. 1156.). Hence the hiareyix on the stage, Pollux iv, 127, Antigone appears on the balcony over the Par thenon in the iiareyix. The data of Vitruvius on the whole are evidently inapplicable here. Comp. Schneider, Bpim. ad Xen, M, S, iii, 8. ad Vitruv, vi, 7, 5. These data of Vitruvius agree on the whole extremely well with the more stately houses in Pompeii (§. 190, R. 4,) and in the Capitoline plan of Rome, Mazois, Essai sur les habitations des anc, Romains, Ru ines de Pompei, P. ii, p. 3 sqq, [A monument erected to science. The most accurate and complete work is Descriz, di una casa Pompeiana Nap, 1837. 4to, a 2nd ed. 1840, a third 1843 by AveUino, who says that there is nothing for which he admires Winckelmann more than his accounts of Pompeii, as he anticipated so much that has been confirmed by later discoveries. P. Marquez Delle case di cittJi d. ant. Romani seoondo la dottrina di Vitr. R. 1795. 8vo. V. Schiassi Degli edifizi di R. ant. Bo logna 1817, 8vo. C. G. Zumpt Ueber die bauliche Binrichtung des Rom. Wohnhauses. B. 1844. 8vo.] 7. Pliny's description of his Laurentinum and Tusoum, Statius Silv. i, 3. are main sources ; [Felibien des Avaux Les plans et les descr. de deux maisons de camp, de Pline. L. 1707. 8vo.] among the moderns, Sca mozzi, FeUbien, Rob, Castell, The Villas of the Ancients iUustrated. L. 1728 fo. The plans of Hadrian's vUla by Ligorio, Peyre, and Piranesi are in the main imaginary. — As to inns we know especially the great xxrxyayiov of Platsea which resembled a caravanserai, Thucyd. iii. 68. 1 294. In sepulchral structures one of two objects com monly predominated, — either to have a chamber for deposit ing the body or the ashes of the deceased, or to erect to him 2 publicly a monument of commemoration (comp. §. 286). The former was the only object in sepulchral chambers constructed subterraneously or hewn out of the rock, if a frontispiece in the rocky wall did not even here announce the situation of a 3 sepulchral chamber (§. 170, 2. 241,* 3. 256. R. 3). In Greek districts, as the colonies of Lower Italy, the form of cofiin-like chambers, or stone-receptacles, recalling the original burying 4 of corpses, prevailed. Labyrinthine chambers and galleries in the rocky ground were also from early times a favourite SEPULCHRAL STRUCTURES. 329 form of necropolis (§. 50, R. 2). The other object, on the 5 contrary, was a necessary ingredient in monuments which are raised above the ground, although these also must still have contained a chamber, in which the immediate receptacle of the relics of the dead was deposited. A vaulted chamber, with niches for the different urns, if the monument (as colum barium) was intended for several, satisfied this want in the simplest manner; to this corresponded externally, and in a natural way, the form of a round towerlike building, which frequently occurs at Rome and Pompeii. Other forms arose 6 inasmuch as the ancient tumuli {yj^iJiara, xoXoivai §. 50, 2) had sometimes circular foundations (§. 170, 2. 241,* 2), and were sometimes of a quadrangular form, from whence resulted a pyramid; which again placed on a cubic basement gave the wide-spread form of the mausoleum (§. 151. R. 1). The ter- 7 race-form of the tombs of Roman emperors (§. 190. R. 1. 191. R. 1. 192. R. 1) was perhaps indebted for its origin to the analogy of the rogus, where it is the most natural. Other 8 forms were produced by the analogy of altars on which liba tions were made to the dead, as well as of temples, with which sepulchral monuments were so much the more closely connected as they were even regarded as heroa.— Connected 9 herewith are the honorary monuments, which certainly had no reference to concealment of the dead, and furnished a place for honorary statues, sometimes under a roof supported by columns (such as the Tetrakionia §. 158. R, 5), sometimes in niches (such as the monument of Philopappus §. 192). Triumphal arches combine in an ingenious manner the twofold destination, to commemorate a victorious return from war, and to elevate curule statues high above the ground. 3. In Attica stone coffins are often found hewn out of the rocks and covered with a stone slab (Leake, Topogr. p. 318) ; similar ones also on the road to Delphi. AnnaU d, I. vii, p. 186. On the Attic tombs {Siiixxi) Cic. de legg. ii. 26. Tile sarcophagus {xs^xpiiog uo^og) Stackelberg Graber Tf 7, an earthen sarcoph, ibid. 8. There are stone-coffins found in niches in the rocks near Ephesus, in Melos and elsewhere. [Numerous and pecuUar in character are the tombs at Chalcis, which are hewn out in the gently acclivous rocky ground. Sepulchral chambers in Melos Ross HaU. A. L. Z. 1838. No. 40. Tombs of Thera Idem AnnaU d. I. xiii. p, 13.] At Assos, Thasos and other places there are many large sarcophagi standing free on pedestals [also before the gate of Platsea along the road to Thebes]. On the tombs of Rhenea, BuU, d, Inst, 1830. p, 9. Kunstbl. 1836. N. 17. In Magna Grecia according to Jorio (§, 257, R, 5) tombs composed of large blocks and covered with small stones or earth prevaU (see the frontispiece to Tischbein's Vasengemalden), and along with these are found tombs hollowed out of the tufa, or even in the mere earth. The tufa-sepulchres especially are often richly orna mented with painting, stucco-work and reliefs. An elegant tomb' dis covered at Canosa in 1826, M. I. d. Inst. 43. Lombardi, Ann. iv. p. 285. 330 ARCHITECTONICS, Comp. Gerhard, BuU. 1829. p. 181. Burial of the dead, Becker GaUus ii. S. 271. 291. 4. The grottoes near Gortyna are given in Lapie's map of Crete. Irregularly planned catacombs at Rome, Naples, and Paris; more systematic at Syracuse, Wilkins M. Gr. p. 50. Hirt ii, s. 88. SimUar to these are the Alexandrine ' (MinutoU, Abhandl. verm. Inhalts, zw. Cycl. i, s, 1,) and the Cyrensean (Pacho, pi, 61,), [E, Braun II laberinto di Por senna comparato coi sepolcri di Poggio-GozeUa nell' agro Clusino. R, 1840 fol,] 5. [In Lycia four kinds of sepulchral architecture ; Fellows Lycia, p. 104. 128., one with Gothic arch in the roof, comp. p. 112. 142. 186. Asia Minor (by the same), p. 219, 231. 228 ; others imitate the timber con struction in the rock, especially at Xanthos, Telmessos and Pinara, comp. Asia Minor, p. 228, an idea which betrays itself also in several of the facades of Phrygian tombs. No part of Asia Minor is so rich in sepul chres as Lycia. Tomb at Mylasa with an open chamber above the grave- chamber, resting on 12 Corinthian columns. Fellows Lycia, p. 76. Re markable tumuU, walled within at Kertsch (Panticapseon). Dubois Voy. in Crimee iv. Sect. pi. 18. Tombs in Phrygia in Steuart Descr. of some anc. mon. with Inscriptions, stUl existing in Lydia and Phrygia L. 1842. comp. BuU. 1843. p. 64. Tombs on the north peak of the citadel of Smyrna (one of Tantalus, according to the false supposition that this was the site of Sipylos), Hamilton Researches in Asia Minor i. p. 47 sqq. comp. Prokesch Wiener Jahrb. 1834. iv. s. 55. of the Anz., tombs hewn out of the rock, sometimes with column fa9ades, at Cagliari in Sardinia, see DeUa Marmora Voy. de la Sardaigne,] Comp. the Rom. tombs in BartoU (§, 210, R, 4,), H, Moses' Collection of ant, vases, pi, 110 — 118 and others. — [Uhden in Wolf and Buttman's Mus. i. s. 586 ff. on temples to the dead with gardens, arbours, choirs, in which were the portrait statues in the form of deities. One of the finest sepul. mon. is that at Weyden near Cologne, Alterth, Verein zu Bonn iu, Tf 5—8. s. 134.]— The Palmyrenian monuments are very peculiar, — quadrangular towers with balconies, on which the occupiers of the monument are represented resting. 6. A PYRAMIDAL monumont near Argos is mentioned by Pausanias ii, 25, 6., a simUar one, of polygonal stones but with mortar, with a sepulchral chamber, is to be seen on the river Pontinus near Argos. Leake, Morea ii. p. 339. With the mausoleum is to be compared the monument of Constantina, in which a pyramid rises over the entablature of a circular building surrounded with columns, §. 256. R. 4. [Comp. §. 48, R. 3.] 7. Hephsestion's pyre (§. 151. R. 2) was perhaps itself an imitation of older Babylonian pyres, such as that of Sardanapalus. [See Gerhard Archaol, Zeit. 1848, s. 73 ] The pyre on the Tarsian coins, on which Hercules-Sandon is burnt (§, 238. R. 4), has the form of a pyramid on a cubic substruction. 8. 'Bapifiii^g Txipog, Paus. ; fiapioi on tombs, Welcker, SyU. Epigr. p, 45. To this class belong the Pompeian sepulchral monuments, which consist of a low piUar with a capping and Ionic cushion ornaments. The Sicyonian tombs were in the form of temples according to Paus. ii, 7, 3. comp. Leake, Morea iii. p. 358. Restoration of an aetos of this kind SANCTUARIES, MARKET-PLACES. 331 found at Bpidauros. Staokelb. Graber Tf 4, Sepul. mon. of Asia Minor C. I. n. 2824 6 •TrXxrxg (hypobathrum), thereon a pcvrifniov = (ia/xog, therein m^og and eiaaarxi, columbaria, si'Soipogof between the fiapiog and sarcophagus, with the figure. The vases, especially those of Lucania and Apulia, also the clay-lamps (Passeri iii, 44.) give numerous representa tions of tomb-temples. Nothing is more common than engaged columns, temple-pediments and antefixa on tombs and cippi. See the examples in Hirt, Tf. 40, 5. 6. 8. 9. and the Mylasenian monument n. 24. Antefixa §. 284. R. 2. 9. One of these destinations of the triumphal arch is described by PUny xxxiv, 12: columnarum ratio erat attoUi supra ceteros mortales, quod et arcus significent, novitio invento (however fornices and signa aurata upon them occur in Liv. xxxiii, 27. as early as the year 566 of the city). L. Rossini GU archi trionfali onorarii e funebri degli ant. Rom. sparsi per tutta Pltalia R. fol. max. Bull. 1837. p. 30. Similar to the triumphal arch were the Tetrapyla at Antioch (§, 149. R, 4), Csesa rea, Palmyra, Constantinople, wherewith especially the crossings of colon nade-streets were arched over. In a gymnasium at Aphrodisias xtvxo- "hi^oi 'TTXqxffrahes xxi to xxr xvrav eiXnpiX pcerd rvig y'hv.oi therein. They are very frequent among vases, for example Moses, pi, 68. 69, (a piempcipxXog, according to Panofka's explanation) sqq. The patinse {ttx- rxvxi) were plates especiaUy for fish ; there are many of these painted with many kinds of fish among the KoUer vases, PateUa is merely the diminutive of patina, principally the flesh-plates of the Lares. Likewise pateUse cum sigilUs in Cic. Verr. iv, 21. x"^?'*' with owl, Aristoph. Av. 357, for the explanation of the small x^?'^' of Nola and Volci [also very numerous in SicUy]. 299. 6. The vessels immediately destined for drinking have the greatest variety of forms. The following in particular are of archseological interest: a. xao-xriaiov, a high cup contracted in the middle with handles from the upper to the lower rim; b. xdv'iia^og, a large wide cup with a lid and a mouth at the side for drinking; c. xJAav, a cup with narrow neck and an elevation on the bottom; d. ffxiipoc, a large round Centaurian and Heraclean cup, with small ears or handles; e. xvXi^, a goblet with one foot and short handles {cSra) ; to this sort be longs the Thericlean cup ; f -^vxr^^, a cylindrical vessel, with a columnar foot placed on an orbicular base; g. dgu/SaXXos, purse-formed cups narrowing upwards ; h. xoruAjj, a small cup, a pointed glass ; similar to it was the top-shaped vXrifio- ¦Xfin ; i, iifiiro/jiog, probably a small semi-oval cup ; k. pvtov, rhy- tium, a horn-shaped vessel, not intended for standing, except when there was a particular stand for it, with a shutting aperture in the lower pointed end, through which the wine poured in at the top flowed out ; of very various, often gro tesque, forms; 1. xigac, the real drinking horn. Another class of vessels are : 7. such as were destined for drawing in quan tity and carrying away (even on the head), xdX'Trri, ubgla, x^aa- chg, urna, large, bellied, narrow above, and provided with a foot and two handles (S.'w.-.s). 8. Similar vessels for carrying DRINKING VESSELS, 337 away, and at the same time for preserving, with narrow neck that could be closed, xdbog, d/j.(po§eug, amphora. 9. In general immoveable vessels, casks, mostly also of clay, ot'3oc, dolium. 10. Basins for hand-washing, ;^sgv;4', ;^Ego'i'/5rrov, polubrum, trul la, trua (Forcellini), aquiminale. Like these were the sprink ling vases, dTo^oavriigiov, 'rigisiavrri^iov, (the sprinkling brush was also so-called), d^bdviov, xu/j,^aXov prffifericulum, 1], Cauldrons for cooking, Xe>3rig, pelvis, ahenum, of course .only elegantly wrought when not to be used for that purpose. The favourite kind of lebes in both cases, especially the latter, was the tripod {xifSrig Tg,Vous, i/irruoiiSrirrig or d'jru^og), the much-boasted master piece of ancient workers in metaL No. 6. a, Athen. xi, 471 e. Macrob. v, 21, Dionysus a'Triviav ix xx^- xviaiov Athen. v, 198 c. The carchesion is often to be seen on vase-paint ings, MUUngen, Cogh. 23, 26, 31. 44. 46. 51. MUlm i, 9. 30. It often appears Ukewise in connexion with the prochus, MilUngen Un. Mon. i, 34. The form on reUefs is less defined, Zoega, Bassir. 77. BouUl. iU, 70. It is not rare among vases, Cogh. 32. b. Athen. p. 473. Macr. in loco. Schol. to Clem. p. 121. In the hands of the Centaurs, in Athen., of Dionysus, according to Plin. xxxiii, 53. Macr. Gruter, Inscr. p. 67, 2. Comp. §. 163. R. 6. and Lenormant, Ann. d. Inst. iv. p. 311. c. Athen. p. 483. Plut. Lye, 9. PoUux x, 66. vi, 96, 97, &c. In Athen. a satyr holds xa^avx pUvarov px[iZar6v, xa^av are^xvxriv, cf, Liebel ad ArchU. p, 142, d. See Athen. p, 498 sq., especiaUy Stesichorus ibid., Macr. v, 21. and the well-known passages of the Roman poets. On the Heraclean scyphos, Athen. 469. ; it is recognised in the wide vase, with the inscrip tion vixx 'H^xxXng, Maisonneuve, pi. 50, and in the reliefs, Zoega 67. 68, 70. 72. ' n.oaxv(pix are two semi-oval cups with the points to one another. Athen, p. 503. e. On the Thericl. KyUx, Athen. p. 470. Schol. Clem. p. 121. Lar- cher, Mem. de PAc. d. I, xUii, p, 196, The name KyUx comprehends many things besides. f. This psykter (see the schol, to Clem, p, 122,) has its name from the cooling vase which is also pointed out in vase-paintings, Letronne, Journ. des Sav. 1833, p. 612. g, Athen. p, 783, compares the aryballos merely on account of the name with d^mnxog. Was it vaso a otre ? h. Athen. p. 478. The cotyliskos was according to Athen. employed especiaUy in the mysteries. On the plemochoe, p. 496, PoUux x, 74. i. Athen. p. 470. k. 'PuTM from pmig. Athen. p. 497. rhytium, MartiaUs ii, 35. The aperture was called x^owog. Hydraulic pvrd of Ctesibius, Athen. ibid. and Heron, p. 172. 203. 216. The rhyton has a picturesque appearance Y 338 FURNITURE AND VESSELS. when it is drunk out of In the hand of a kind of Hebe, Athen. x. p. 426,, of satyrs, msenads (Athen. x, 445), reveUers, also sacrificial servants. See Ant. Ere. i, 14, iii, 33. Gell, Pomp. pi. 30. Used as a cornucopia, Athen. xi, 497. Among vases it occurs with very different animal-heads, bicchiere a testa di mulogrifo-cavaUo-pantera. Tischb. ii, 3. MiUin, i, 32. u, 1, Of stone, BouUl. iii, 76. 1. Ki^xrx especially in earUer times, but later also at Athens, with stands {¦x-e^itrxexig, Bockh, Staatsh. ii. s, 320. R. Rochette, Journ, des Sav. 1830. p. 472.), often in the hands of the old Dionysus, Laborde ii, 19, On 3/x£j«f §. 433. I pass by many names which are in general clear, such as xo-irdg, xvpi- i8/oi/, yxvXog, oivoxm, 'hxynvov, o|i//3«(po», acetabulum, also measure, Panofka Recherches, pi. 6. n. 8. p. 20. ; also the older names only preserved in poetry : Hicxg, xKeiaov, xv'iieXKov {xfitpixiiTriTiT^ov) ; also the strictly Roman ones: sini, capulce, which were superseded in Varro's time by Greek forms. L. L. ix. §. 21. 7. We see how near this kind of vessels is allied to that which foUows, especially in the Panathenaic prize-vases (§. 62. 99. R. 3. No, 1.), which are mostly called Ilxvx^nvx'ixol dpitpo^eig (Atben. v, 199,), but also xx>^wihg (Callim,) and Ci^lxi (Schol. Pind. N. x, 64,), The Corinthian hydrise had two handles at the top, and two smaUer ones in the middle of the beUy, Athen. p. 488. Uke many vases, Langella, [Brinna Bpigr. 2, mv^ipiog x^aaaog. So also Hegesippus Ep, 6, Moschus iv, 34, evx x%"''£""> 'eg ourix xpaaaov XTtrxvroiv Xi^xvreg. In Attica numerous marble x^aauot of the kind with inscriptions and sometimes also figures, Hesyohius x^ouraog, xixv%g, hence Letronne in the Joum, des Sav. 1830. p. 308, takes the two to be one, and explains it as vase funeraire. But 'Aiixv^og is not a water vessel, Uke x^amog, according to poets and grammarians quoted by Letronne ; the Xtixv^og might be occasionally caUed x^aaaog, but the urn (xjujffffoV) never xiixv^og as the latter only contained perfumes.] 8. The amphorse were often pointed below, and could then only stand in holes, like those of Herculaneum (Winck. u. s. 70.) and those of Leptis in the Brit. Mus., some of which stiU bear the name of the consul. There are also amphorse of this description with stands in Canino. This was the case also with the xe^xfux Xix on the coins of Chios. Such are carried by satyrs, Terrac. Brit. M. 13. MiUin, Vas. i, 53. The stand for them was the in^itega {iyyv^rixn, dyyo^iixn), Festus s, v, Athen. v, 210 c. So xTix/ixarQo^^xn. Sculpture on the iyyv^rixxi. Bekker Anecd. i. p. 245, 29. The iftfixaeig (Cod, Flor.) of Corinthian vases appear to be the same. Dig. xxxii, 100. The Panathenaic vases on the other hand have bases ; their form in early specimens is shorter and more beUied, after wards more slender (as on the later coins of Athens). 10. See Nonius, p. 544. Phialse served also as aporrhanteria. C. I. 138, 1. 6. 142. 1. 5. Festus : Nassiterna est genus vasi aquari ansati et patentis, quale est quo equi perfundi sclent ; Plautus — Cato. 11. With regard to the tripod, it is proved that the destination of receiving minced flesh lies at the foundation (the author's diss. De Trip. Delph.), even by the use of it for riptvuv acpxyia at the S^xog (Eurip. ' Ixet. 1202, by which Soph. (Ed. Col. 1593 is explained). As to the form, see the SACRIFICIAL UTENSILS, SEPULCHRAL VASES. 339 dissertations Amalth. i. s. 120 ff. ii. s. x. ni. s. 21 ff. [B6ttiger Archaol. u. K. I. S. 154. Passow S. xxiii. (Bottiger) ]. BrSndsted Voy.. i. p. 116 sqq. Gott. G. A. 1826. No. 178. As the orbicular form of the holmos is proved, and the so-called cortina has now been recognised as the ompha los (§. 361.), the essentials of the tripod-form are now clear. The ring in which the cauldron hung was called ari.xaix Welcker Akad, Kunst museum, s. 7, Statues of gypsum were used especiaUy for temporary pur poses. Spartian Sever, 22. comp, Pausan. i, 40, 3. Arnob. vi, 14 sqq. Gypsum heads, Juv. ii,.4. Reliefs in stucco were often only sketches for distant view (we have such from Hadrian's vUla), often continued with colours on the fiat surface. It is stiU a question whether the tabula Uia- ca and the apotheosis of Hercules are of stucco. Waxen images, §. 129, 5. 181, 3., images of the gods, PUn. Bp. vii, 9., of the Lares, Juv. xii, 88., as children's playthings in Lucian Somnium 2. and elsewhere. DoUs, xoqoxotifiix, of wax and gypsum, Schol. to Clem. p. 117. Comp. on the an cient x»§oirAa9(K Bottiger's Sabina, s. 260, 270, Variegated doUs of ¦jrrikog, Lucian Lexiph, 22., oi ¦?r?ixrrovrsg roiig irrihivovg, Demosth. PhU. i. p. 47., xojo^rAaSo;, Isocr. De Antid. §. 2., statues of this kind at Naples. Comp. SibyUin. ui. p. 449 Gall. On the deceptive fruit-plates of Posis (§. 196. R. 2.), PUn. xxxv, 46, There are also gilded terra-cottas of deli cate Greek workmanship, painted ones from Athens, Cab, Pourtalfes pi, 2, comp, pi, 31, [the finest from Athens at Munich, others here and there], 5. Ilqoir'hxirpix as a model in miniature in Cic, ad Att, xii, 41,, comp. §. 196, 2. Hippocr. de victus rat. p. 346. Foes. 6. That gypsum was much used in taking casts (¦s-jo's diropi.xypi.xrx) is stated by Theophrastus, De lapide, §, 67, The Athenian artists also used pitch in casts of Hermes Agoraios (§, 92. R. 3.), comp. Luc. Lexiph. 11. (Mouler \ bon creux, ^ creux perdu; pliltre; cou tures des inoules ^ bon creux; parties qui ne sent pas de depouille, of mastic). 7. This, as it were, still fleshless figure of wood was called xiwxliag, x.xvxi3og (canevas) ; similar figures likewise served as an anatomical study to plastse and painters. See Arist. H, an, iii, 5, de gen, an, ii, 6, Pol lux vii, 164, X, 189, Suidas and Hesych. s. v. cum. Intpp. Apostol. iii, 82. Bekker's Anecd. p. 416. To these refer the parvi admodum surculi, 346 TECHNICS OF THE FORMATIVE ART. quod primum operis instar fuit, PUn. xxxiv, 18. — The modelling stick in the hand of Prometheus, Admir. Rom. 80. Ficoroni, Gem. ii, 4, 5., comp. 6, 1. Imp. Gemm. del Inst, iv, 75 ? and the reUef in Zoega, Bassir. 23. But according to Polyclete the work was most difficult orxv iv 6'vvxi 6 irrihog yiyvnrxi. Winok. V. s. 93 387. Wyttenbach ad Plut. de prof. virt. p. 86. a. PolUce ducere (coram) Juv. vu, 232. Pers. v, 40., comp. Stat. AchUl, i, 332. 8, Schweighauser the younger has instituted investigations, from excavations in Alsatia, as to the construction of ovens for burning Ro man vases; there is a model of them in the museum at Strasburg. Archseologia xxU, pi, 36. p. 413. Remains of a Roman kiln or furnace for pottery. On Greek vases §. 321. Lucian describes the great thinness and lightness of ancient vases (PUn. xxxv,- 46) in the Lexiph. 7. by dve- p60.iyiog, ro wiiXivov, xovix, dXoi(p7i' r^vTTVifixrx ra A Ttx^xTrT^^ffix' p^jwyo?, p^iyi/gyg/y* See PoUux x, 189., Photius, x/ySof, Bustath. ad II. xxi. p. 1229., ad Od, xxu, p, 1926. R, Schneider s, v, Xtyiog, x"^"''!- Diogenes L, v, 1, 33, ug iv r$ xn^$ 0 'E^pcvig iTirriheiorrirx 'exav i'jrihi^xa^xi roi/g x^^^xrii^xg xxi 6 iv ra xp7i(pog tSu r^ix^apiuv, i^v^qd 'eirmoXiig, Lucian dial, mer, ix, 2, Sardonyches temis glutinantur gemmis ; — aliunde ni- gro, al. candido, al, minio. Plin, 75, comp, 23, AohiU. T, u, 11, Schol, ad Clem, p, 130, Works by Kohler and Briickmann on the subject (1801 — 1804), PUny also mentions (63) other oriental stones of several colours, quse ad ectypas scalpturas aptantur. The bluish nicolo (onicolo) consisting of two layers was used for intagUos. The ancients recognised especiaUy Upper India and Bactria as the native country of cameo-stones, Theoph. De lap. §. 35. Comp. Gr. Veltheim, Sammlung einiger Aufsatze ii. s. 203. Bottiger, ueber die Aechtheit und das Vaterland der antiken Onyx-Cameen von ausserordentlioher Grosse. Leipz. 1796. Heeren, Ideen i, 2. s. 211. Luc. de Syr. dea 32. mentions that there were on the image of the goddess many precious stones, white, water-coloured, fiery sardonyxes {owxeg 'S.x^iaoi), hyacinths, and emeralds which had been brought thither by Egyptians, Indians, Ethiopians, Medes, Armenians, and Babylonians. 1 314. Now, with regard to the mode of working, we only know from antiquity this much, that the polisher (politer) first gave to the stone a plane or convex form, which was 2 preferred especially for signet-rings ; then the stone-cutter (scalptor, cavarius) attacked it partly with iron instruments smeared with Naxian or other emery and oil, which were sometimes round, sometimes pointed and drill-formed, but 3 partly also with a diamond point set in iron. The adjustment of the wheel, by which the instruments were set in motion, whilst the stone was held to them, was probably similar in 4 antiquity to what it is now. The careful polishing of all parts of the engraved figures was a great aim with the ancient stone-engravers, and is therefore a criterion of genuineness. 1. AiSiorqi^ixvi and ?i(9ougy;x^, the art of the politer and scalptor in Lysias' Fragm. ¦jre^l rov rinvov. On the Latin names, Salmas. Exerc. Plin. p. 736. comp. SiUig 0. A. p. viii. We do not find the numerous facets of modern art among the ancients; hexagons and cyUnders were the favourite forms for ornaments. 2. PUn. xxxvii, 76. Tanta differentia est, ut aUse ferro scalpi non possint, ali» non nisi retuso, verum omnes adamante : plurimum vero in his terebrarum proficit fervor. The ferrum retusum is the punch, boute- roUe, whose round hoUowings did the most in the coarser works, §. 97, 3. On ccelum and marcvlus, Pronto,' Bp. iv, 3., on the lima likewise Isidor. Origg. xix, 32, 6. The Naxian dust §. 310, 3., served for cutting and polishing, according to PUny xxxvi, 10., comp. Theoph. 44. On vpiv^ig, emery Dioscor. v, 165. [Hesych. v. npA-vqig, Isid, xvi, 4, 27. smir Jerem. WORKING IN PRECIOUS STONES. 361 xvii, 1 . Ostracite used for gnawing, Veltheim Ueber Memnons Bilds. S. 40 If.] Schneider ad Bcl. Phys. p. 120. and in the Lex. Plin. xxxvii, 15 : Adamantem cum feliciter rumpere contigit, in tam parvas frangitur crustas, ut cerni vix possint ; expetuntur a soalptoribus, ferroque in- cluduntur, nuUam non duritiam ex facili cavantes, speaks evidently of the diamond point, Pinder de adam. p. 63. comp. on the splinters of the ostracitis, PUn. 65. Veltheim Aufsatze ii. s. 141. On the technical processes of the ancient stone-cutters: Mariette, Trait6 des pierres gravies. P. 1750. f. Natter, TraitS de la m6thode ant. de graver en pierres fines compar6e avec la meth. moderne. L. 1764. Lessing in the Antiq. Briefen i, 103 ff'. [Br. 27. S. 209 ff.] and in the KoUectaneen zur Literatur. Bd. i. ii. Ramus von geschnittenen Steinen und der Kunst selbige zu graviren. Kopenh. 1800. Gurlitt, Gemmenkunde, Archseol. Schr. herausgeg. von Corn. MuUer, s. 87 i. Hirt, Amalth. ii. s. 12. 315. Stones destined for signet-rings next came into the 1 hand of the goldsmith (compositor, annularius) who set them, and here the form of the sling {^(pivbdvn, pala) was a favourite one. Although in the signet-ring the device was 2 certainly the principal thing, the name however is sometimes added ; and here it must be assumed, that a name which readily strikes the eye, must rather be referred to the posses sor, than to the artist, of the gem. The circumstance that not 3 merely individuals, but states had their seals, perhaps explains the great correspondence of many gems with coin-types; thus also the Roman emperors sealed with their heads, at the same time that their coins were stamped with them. The frequent 4 application of engraved stones to the decoration of drinking- cups and other utensils [a practice derived from Byzantium], was continued down to the middle ages; even now antique gems must be sought for sometimes in church-vessels. In 5 engraved vessels entirely of gems, which are connected with the class of large cameos, many works, admirable for the extent and difficulty of the workmanship, have been pre served, although none of them belongs to the times of a pure taste, and a genuine Hellenic exercise of art. 1. See among others Eurip. Hippol. 876. rCirai a^evlovng xjuffnTiaTov, comp. Monck. — AU rings were at first signet-rings (comp. §. 97, 2) ; then they became ornaments and badges of honour, un-engraved also were readUy worn, and the engraved everywhere else applied. Kirchmann De Annulis. 2. On the names on gems, v. Kohler and R. Rochette, see §. 131. R. 2., Comp. §. 200. R. 1. Gemmse ant. litteratse by Fr. Ficoroni. R. 1757., by Stosch, §. 264. R. 1. Bracci Comm. de ant. soalptoribus, qui sua no mina inciderunt. P. 1786. 2 vols, text, 2 plates. It is certain, indeed, that when the artist gave his name he did it in the least observable manner possible. Hence the catalogues of gem-cutters, of which the Visconti-Millin (Visconti, Varie Opere, T. ii. p. 115. MiUin, Introduc tion a l'6tude des pierres gr. P. 1797. 8vo.) is the richest, furnish little 362 TECHNICS OF THE FORMATIVE ART. that is avaUable for the history of art. Many names rest merely on a difiFerent reading, as Pergamus and Peigmus ; Dalion and AUion are pro bably Admon (AAAION), comp. Journ, des Sav, 1833, p, 753 sq. Besides those above named, we also know, from PUny, Apollonides and Cronius ; of the former we have perhaps still a fragment. The Tryphon celebrated by AddsBus of Mitylene, Brunck Anal, ii, 242,, is perhaps the same whose name stands on several beautiful stones ; however even Addseus' time is uncertain, 3. See on the state-seals Facius' Miscel. 72. On the imperial seals Sueton. Aug. 60. Spart. Hadr. 26. U. Fr. Kopp, ueber Entstehung der Wappen. 1831. 4. See §. 161, 1. 207, 7. also 298. R, 1, Gemmata potoria, PUn, xxxvu, 6. [vasa ex auro et gemmis xxxvu, 63, gemmata vasa of Agatho cles, Auson. ep. 8,] Juv, x, 27,, from which are also to be explained Juv, V, 43. and Martial xiv, 109. Yuxt^js? iixXi!ioi, Plut. vii, p, 154. H. lances, phialsB with gemmse inclusse. Dig, xxxiv, 2, 19. Comp. Meurs. de luxu Rom, c. 8, T. V, p, 18, [The Xi^oxoXXnra §, 161. R, 1, were even in use at Babylon §. 237, R, 2, among the Indians also golden vessels set with pre cious stones occur Bhartrihari's Sententise ed, Bohlen u, 98, Doors, waUs, roofs with gold, silver, and precious stones also among the Sab«ans, Strab, xvi, p. 778, Stones from Bactriana, which wore used in 'Ki%x6x>^nrx, Theoph. -TT. x/9, §. 35. At the Persian court xXivxi 'hiSiox.oKKrrroi xxi o'Ao- xqvaoi, PhUo in Euseb. Pr. ev. viii, p, 389 a. A dove Xi^ox. in the pos session of Cyrus, .SlUan V, H. xii, 1. (paxlg y^Aox. on the hearse of Alex ander Diod. xviii, 26,, at a symposium Cleopatra gave to Anthony "mxvrx X^yuex xxi A. -neqirrag i^ii^yxirpiivx rxig rixvxig, Athen, iv. p. 147 sq. A ieqd (ptxT^ri ix ;^fU(roS itxxrxTiXvrog iixTiiSiog made for the triumph of Paulus iEmilius. Plut. .Slmil. P. 33. Pompey triumphed in a x^ptx x. Appian. B. Mithrid. 117. Into his hands fell at Talaura, Mithridates' treasury of art {rxpneiov rrig xxrxaxev/ig), besides 2,000 onyx vessels, pavrx Trteiv. The verse from Anacreon Fr. 66. ed, Bergk. — [Arneth, Explanation of the 12 largest engraved stones of the Boyal Cabinet of Coins, Weiner Jahrb. 1839. i Anz. s. 28. The gems with Germanicus and Agrippina, Gott. Anz. 1847. s. 456.] Large cameos §, 161, 4. 200, 2, 207, 7, The Vatican cameo in four layers is still larger than that of Paris ; it repre sents Dionysus and Ariadne drawn by four centaurs, Buonarroti, Me dagl. p. 427, comp, Hirt ibid,, s, 342. — Statue of Nero in jasper, of Ar sinoe in emerald, PUn, ; figurettes in plasma di smeraldo are oftener to be met with. The LITERATURE of glyptography is given by MiUin, Introd, (very in complete) and Murr, Biblioth. DactyUograph. Dresd. 1804. 8vo. Geh- BRAL coUections of gems by Domen. de Rubeis (iEneas Vicus inc.). Pet. Stephanonius (1627), Agostini (1667. 69), de la Chausse (1700), [Rome 1805 in 2 vols. 8vo.] P. A, Maffei and Domen, de Rossi (1707-9, 4 vols,), 364 TECHNICS OF THE FORMATIVE ART. [Nov. Thesaur. vet. gemmarum 4 vols, fob] Gravelle (1732. 37), Ogle (1741), Woriidge (1778), Monaldini and Cassini (1781-97, 4 vols, fo,), SpUsbury (1785), Raponi (1786) and others. Particular cabinets by Gorlseus (first 1601), Wilde (1703), Bbermayer (1720-22), Marlborough (1730), [Choix de pierres ant, gr, du Cab, du Duo de Marlborough fol, 2 vols,, each of 50 pi,, very rare,] Odescalchi §, 262. R.4., Stosch §. 264. R. 1., Zanetti (ed. by A. Fr. Gori. 1750), Smith (DactyUotheca Smithiana with commentary by Gori. V. 1767. 2 vols. fo.). From the Cabinet du Roi, Caylus RecueU de 300 tStes and Mariette's Recueil 1750. comp. §. 262. R. 3. Those of Florence in Gori, Wicar, Zannoni, §. 261, R, 2, Those of Vienna, §, 264, R, 1. The Imperial Russian, §, 265, R, 2, Those of the Netherlands, §, 266, R, 1. [The Royal at Naples,] Catalogues of the Crozat collection (by Mariette 1741 ; it has gone to Russia with the Orleans coUection), the de France §, 264, 1,, the Praun at Niirnberg (by Murr, 1797), [now in the possession of Mad. Mertens-Schaafhausen at Bonn,] the coUection of Prince Stanis las Poniatowsky, which is fuU of counterfeits, [Catal. des p, gr. ant. du prince Stan. Poniatowsky 4to, Fir, 1831,] L, Rossi Spiegaz, diuna Race, di gemme vol, i. Mil. 1795, 8vo. [Dubois Descr. des p. gr. ant. et mod. do feu M. Grivaud de la VinceUe P. 1820.] Creuzer zur Gemmenkunde; ant. geschn. St. vom Grabmal der h. Elizabeth 1834. cf. Feuerbach im Kunstbl. Visconti Esposiz. deUe impr. di ant. gemme raccolte per uso del Princ. Chigi in his Op. Div. T. 2, his most important work on engraved stones. SohlichtegooU's Answahl 1798. 4to.] Vivenzio, Gemme antiche in edite, R, 1809. 4to. Millin, Pierres gravees ined. (an opus postumum). P. 1817. 8vo. [Gemme incise dai Cav. Gius. Girometti publ. con le iUustr. di. P. E. Visconti R. 1836. fol. 10 pi. Bd. of only 100 copies.] Impressions by Lippert in a pecuUar mass (two collections, a Latin catalogue by Christ and Lippert for the first, a German one by Thierbach for the second) ; by Dehn in brimstone, descr. by Fr. M. Dolce (E. Qu. Visconti?) 1772; by Tassie, in something Uke enamel (Catalogue des empreintes de Tassie by Raspe, 1792) ; of the BerUn coUection §. 264. B. 1. ; Impronte gemmarie deir Instituto, comp. BuU. 1830. p. 49. Cent. i. u. Bull. 1831. p. 105, iu, iv, BuU. 1834. p. ] 13. [v. vi. 1839. p. 97.] Archaol. InteU. 1835. No. 64- 66, [Th, Cades has coUected 5,000 carefuUy selected impressions in Rome, among them 400 stones of Etrurian origin,] Much on particular gems in Montfaucon, Caylus, Visconti, loonographie, ivx rav iixcpHv in the palace of Demetrius Phalereus, Athen. xii, 642. The mosaic of glass cubes is designated in Pliny xxxvi, 64. by vitreee camerce; to this refers Statius, S. i, 5, 42 : eiFulgent camerse vario fastigia vitro, comp. Seneca, Bp. 90. Noted workers in mosaic (musivarii ; in the Theodos. codex dis tinguished from the tesselarii) besides Sosus, Dioscurides and HeracUtus (§. 209. R. 1.) [on the fine asaroton from VUla Lupi in the Lateran .... irog nqyxaxro, and the other portion of the name is said to be still with the restorer, §. 209. R. 1.], Proclus and J. Soter (Welcker, Rhein. Mus. fiir Phil, i, 2, s, 289,), Puscus at Smyrna (1 Marm, Oxon, ii, 48,), Prostatius ? (Schmidt Antiq, de la Suisse, p. 19,), Celebrated mosaics besides those mentioned §, 163: 1, The Prsenestine, from a tribunal (comp, Johannes Bv. 19, 13.), which can scarcely be that of Sulla (PUn. xxxvi, 64.), a na tural-historical and ethnographic representation of Egypt. Del. Jos. Sincerus, sc. Hieron. Frezza. 1721. Bartoli Peint. ant. 34. comp. M^m. de I'Acc. des Inscr. xxviii. p. 591. xxx. p. 503. L. Cecconi, Del pavimento in mus. rinv. nel tempio d. Portuna Prfoncst R. 1827, opposite views in 378 TECHNICS OF THE FORMATIVE ART. C. Pea, L'Egitto conquistato daU' Imp. Cesare Ott. Aug. sopra Cleopatra e M. Ant. rappr. nel musaico di Palestrina. [R. 1828. 4to. A striking explanation, which is confirmed on all sides. In Uke manner is the re ception of Io by Egypt represented in Pompeian pictures §. 351. R. 4. Visconti also conjectured it to be Octavian as conqueror of Egypt M. PioCl. vii. p. 92., Idem in Laborde Mos. d'ltaUca p. 90. The best coloured copy is that of Barthelemy in the 2nd ed. of his Treatise, of which only 30 copies were printed ; a new one is a necessity for the history of paint ing. There is an antique copy of a smaU portion at BerUn, according to Uhden in the Schriften der BerL Akad. fiir 1825. S. 70 f ] Comp. §. 435. 2. The CapitoUne mosaic with the spinning Hercules from Antium, M. Cap. iv, 19. 3. That in the ViUa Albani, executed in a particularly fine manner, Hercules as the deUverer of Hesione, Winck. M. I. 66. 4. The one from Hadrian's Tiburtine -yiUa with the battle of the panthers and centaurs, in sed. M. Marefusci, SavoreUi del. CapeUani sc. [in execution the finest of all, now in Berlin, Bull. 1845. p. 226. ; it appeared in the M, d, I, for 1847. Two important pieces also in the Quirinal palace from VUla Hadriana, — a youthful colossal head and a great number of birds, separated by treUis-work]. 5, That from Prseneste in ViUa Barberini, the rape of Buropa, Agincourt, Peint. pi. 13, 8. 6. The large mosaic from Otriooli, in diff'erent compartments (Medusa's head, centaurs, ne- reids, (fee), PCI, vii, 46, (others 47-50,), 7. Scenes from tragedy and the satiric drama in the PioClem. Millin, Desor. d'une mosaique antique du M. PCI, 1819. fo, 8. The large mosaic from ItaUca (38 X 27^ feet. Muses' heads and circus games) of which a minute account has been given espe ciaUy by Laborde §, 262, R. 4. Comp, §. 424, R. 2. Mosaic of Toulouse, §. 402. R. 3. Theseus and Minotaur ,Zqog 1 See Du Cange Lex. Gr. p. 837. 6. A pecuUarly Roman method of wearing the amiculum is to be seen in the so-called Pudicitise. M. PioCl. u, 14. Cap. iii, 44. August, 118, The apron of the servants of magistrates, which is to be seen on Roman monuments, wa's caUed limum. Tiro in GeUius xii, 3, 3. [Lion Tironiana p,8,] 5, military costume. 342. The military costume of the ancients is only met with in any completeness in early Grecian vase-paintings, and in Roman portrait statues (thoracatse §. 199. R. 3,) and historical reliefs ; works of the most flourishing period of Greek art are satisfied with indications. The helmet was either a leathern cap, but which might also be covered with tin plate {xuieri, xaraTru^, galea), Or the large equestrian helmet {xogug, x^dvog, cassis). Here again we can distinguish the helmet used in the Peloponnesus (the x^dvog Ko^iv^ioviyeg), having a visor with eye holes, which could be raised or lowered at pleasure, and the helmet worn in Attica and elsewhere with a short plate for the forehead {nrKpdvrj) and side-flaps. The solid breast-plate, {ffrddiog ^wjaf) contradistinguished from the ring-hauberk {ar^i-rrhg), and consisting of two metal-plates {ydaXa), of which 408 FORMS OF THE PLASTIC ART. the one in front was often very richly ornamented with reliefs, was usually straight below, but in Roman works shaped to the form of the body (a rule however which was by no means universal) ; above, it was held together by shoulder-plates, and below by a girdle round the loins (^w/ia) ; and it was suitably 5 lengthened by leathern stripes {itri^oyig) faced with metal. The greaves also {xvYig^Tbeg, ocrese), wrought of elastic tin, and which were clasped below by the ankle-ring {sirie ¦ ¦ 6. A fine bust of this description from the Townley collection, in the British Museum, Spec. 31. The fine head also which stands on a trunk composed of fragments, at Dresden 142., Augusteum 39., presents similar youthful forms. 7. For instance, the torso which formerly belonged to the Medicean coUection, and which has been at Paris, L. 682 [p. 3.], since the time of Louis XIV. M. Nap. i, 3. BouiU. i, 1. Clarac, pi. 312. [A torso in the Mus. del princ. Biscari p. 5. is highly praised by Sestini, Bartel's Br. iiber Sicilien ii. S. 136. Body of a colossal Jupiter without head, MiUin Voy. au Midi de la France pi. 69, 11. Colossal herma of Zeus, of the time of the Cesars, in Sarskoezelo, Kohler in the Journal von Russland i. 8. 342. Upper half figure of Zeus, Mus. Brescian. tv. 35.] The celebrated, but also doubtful cameo in the Lib. of St. Mark with the head of Z. jEgiochus (Treatises by Visconti and Bianconi, G. M. 11, 36.) exhibits love of battle, pride of victory and clemency finely blended together. A Ufe-size statue of Z. .^giochus in Leyden, Archaol. InteU. Bl. 1836. N. 47. The head of Z. 'S.rqxrnyog from Amastris, shows a similar bold disposition of the hair. Combe N. M. Brit. 9, 9. 10. On deviations iu the form of the hair and beard of Z. Visconti POl. vi. p. 1. 2. 350. The sitting posture of the statues of Zeus, in which the himation, which is sunk down to the loins, forms the usual drapery, is connected with the idea of tranquil power, victo rious rest ; the standing posture {dydX/j^ara h^^d), in which the himation is often entirely discarded, or only the back is cov ered, carries with it the idea of activity; Zeus is then conceived as protector, patron of political activity, or as the god who punishes and guards with thunderbolts. Here also there is sometimes found a youthful form, in regard to which we must conceive Zeus as still contending, and not yet come to the dominion of the world. However, there is much calm even in the standing figures of Zeus; violent striding is not suited to the form of this god. The patera as a sign of worship, the sceptre as a symbol of sway, the goddess of victory in 422 MYTHOLOGICAL SUBJECTS. his hand, the eagle, his messenger, and the thunderbolt, his weapon, are his principal attributes. The wreath of wild olive {xormg) distinguishes the Olympian from the Dodonaear Jupiter, who has the crown of oak-leaves, and much also thai is peculiar in the disposition of the hair as well as in configu ration. Representations in which his significance as a god ol nature, a mystical reference, or his relation to the system ol the universe appear prominently, are comparatively rare, and. for the most part, not earlier than the times of declining art. or else they are borrowed from Asiatic regions. Essential deviations are presented by the barbarian deities which were merely Hellenized as Zeus. 1. A sedent Zeus at Olympia, also in other places, as iHixntpoqog, Victoi (Combe N. Brit. 6, 24. G. M. 10, 43. 177 b, 673.) ; marble statuette at Lyons, Zeus as Olympius, Clarac pi. 397. no. 665. [AnnaU d. Inst, xui, p. 52, tv, D,]; Z, Ephesius, Mionnet Suppl, vi. pi. 4. no. 1. comp. T. iii, p, 98. no. 282. Zeus Idseus, with Pallas on his left, on coins of Ilion. M. I. d. Inst. 57. ; moreover the Zeus with the eagle on his hand, who. according to the coins, belonged to a Macedonian sanctuary (probably Dion) ; likewise the CapitoUne Zeus with the thunderbolt in his right hand, the left on the sceptre, MoreUi N. Fam. Inc. tb. 1, 1. Impp, Vitell. tb, 2, 8, The sitting Zeus has often, as the appeased thunderer, the thunderbolt in his lap, Tassie, Cat, i, p, 86, 87, no. 941. 942. also a victor's crown, G, M. 9, 44. An enthroned Zeus, which also expresses rest by leaning his head on his right hand, in a Pompeian picture, Zahn 26. GeU, N. Pomp. pi. 66. M. Borb. vi, 52. The colossal statue of Zeus from Solus completely draped, with elegant footstool, Serradifalco Cenni sugli avanzi di Solunto tv. 3. [Antich. d. Sicilia T. v. tv. 38.] ; Z. sitting on the eagle, bronze from Oberndorf, hist. Abhdl. der Miinchner Akad. Bd. V. tf 7. 2. Standing (as the Z. Nemeios, Paus. ii, 20, 3.) and wrapped in the himation, for example that of Laodicea having the sceptre in the left and the eagle in the right hand, on coins of concord. Less enveloped the statues of Jupiter, M. Cap. iii, 2. 3. Bouill. iii, 1, 1. Clarac, pi. 311. The hierat. relief PCI. iv, 2. ZeusiEtnseus on coins, Bull. d. Inst. 1831. p. 199. The standing Z. Homagyrios of the Aohseans entirely undraped, with a Nike on the right, the sceptre in the left hand. N. M. Brit. 7, 15, 8, 6, A standing Jupiter, with little drapery, with thunderbolt and sceptre, bronze from Besangon, Cab. Pourtalfes pi, 3, Often on Roman coins, un draped in front ; as J, Stator ; as Conservator hurling the thunderbolt, with sceptre G, M, 9, 45, J. Imperator, with the right hand resting on a lance, the thunderbolt in the left, with the left foot planted higher, on coins of Commodus, Pedrusi v, 17, (comp. however Levezow Jupiter Im per. B. 1826. s. 13.). [J. Imperator or Urius on a coin of Syracuse and in a statue from Tyndaris, Abeken in the Annali xi. tv. A. p. 62. comp. 0. Jahn Archaol. Aufs. s. 31. Cavedoni Bull. 1840. p. 69. 110.] On the gem of the supposed Onesimus, MiUin P. gr. 2., with sceptre, patera, and an eagle beside him carrying a garland in its beak. Fine bronze from Paramythia, entirely without drapery, with patera, Spec, i, 32. [another from the same place, also naked, with chlamys however on the arm, ibid. ZEUS, DIFFERENT REPRESENTATIONS. 423 52. 53.] ; such bronze figures are frequent, the thunderbolt is more usual than the patera. Ant, Ere. vi, 1, 2. Athenian coins on which Zeus, with thunderbolt and patera, steps slightly forward, N. Brit. 7, 1. Statue M. Cap. iii, 4. BouiU. ui, 1, 3. 3. An unbearded Zeus standing, with thunderbolt and segis girded round his left arm, with the inscription Nswou, Gemme SchUchtegroU Pierr. grav. 20. G. M. 11, 38,, comp. Winok. W. v. s. 213. A youthful Z. (Tinia) with the thunderbolt on the Ficoroni Etruscan mirror, Etrus ker ii. s. 44. Unbearded statues of Zeus in Paus. vii, 24. v, 24. Zeus HeUenius without beard on Syracusan coins ; on Roman (Stieglitz Distr. num. fam. p. 35.) ; gems of this sort, Tassie, p. 84. no. 886. 4. On coins of EUs (MUlingen, Anc. coins, pi. 4, 21.) Z. lets the eagh fly as his augury. On gems (Lippert ii, 4. 6. Tassie i. p. 87.) which treat the subject sportively the eagle receives from Z. the garland which he is to carry to a favourite ; he is also seen bearing the thunderbolt, with garland or palm in his beak. The eagle kiUing the hare or the serpent, on gems and coins, is an ancient augury of victory. Zeus as xxrxifixrng holds the thunderbolt in his right, sitting on a rook, the eagle at his feet, on coins of the Cyrrhestians, of the time of the Antonines, Mionnet Descr. v. p. 135 sq. Burmann de Jove xxrxiiixryi. The thunderbolt lies on a throne as an idol of worship on coins of Seleucia in Syria, comp. Norisius, Ann. Syromac. p. 267. The thunderbolt is mostly formed as xsqavvog xixp'.xrx;, often also with wings. 6. On Elean coins the head of Z. Olympius with the Kotinos garland, on the reverse the eagle with the serpent or the hare. N. Brit. 7, 17 sqq. Stanhope Olympia, pL 17. Descr. de I'Egypte v. pi. 59. The Olympian Z. is also characterized by the sphinxes at the arms of the throne (Paus. v, 11, 2.), on the Parthenon, in the reUef in Zoega, Bass, i, 1. Hirt, Bild. ii. s. 121. Tf 14, 1. (Zeus, Alpheus as man, .ffllian V. H. u, 33., Olympias, Poseidon, Isthmias). The Dodonoean Z. on coins of Pyrrhus in Mionnet, Descr. pi. 71, 8. [B. Braun recognises him Dekaden i, 4, in a herma at Berlin, crowned with oak-leaves] ; the female figure enthroned, with polos and sceptre, with her drapery drawn over the shoulder in the manner of Aphrodite, is certainly the Dodonsean Dione. Heads of Zeus and Dione are seen to gether on coins of the Bpirotes ; behind, an Epirote /SoSj ^ovqiog >.xqiv6g, N.-Brit. 6, 14., comp. 16, Mionnet Suppl, iii, pi, 13, AUier de Haute roche 5, 18, The Capitoline Jove is without a wreath on the denarii of the gens Petilia, 6, Z.