A NEW TYPE OF LETHAL HEREDITARY FACTOR IN DROSOPHILA BY DAVID HIRAM THOMPSON B. S. Purdue University 1919 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ZOOLOGY IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 1921 \°tl\ -T'11 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS THE GRADUATE SCHOOL May , 20 § I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ry David Hiram Thompson ENTITLED AJEQ5W TYPE 0? LETHAL HWRTTTARY PAOTOR IK DROSOPHILA BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science in ?nAir, g y 2 , in Charge of Thesis eacrof Department Recommendation concurred in* Committee on Final Examination* Required for doctor s degree but not for master’ A HEW TYPE OP LETHAL HEREDITARY FACTOR IE DROSOPHILA Contents Page I Introduction X II Method of culture and maintenance of stock,, 2 III Origin of erect IV Sex ratios and frequency of erect .......... .4 V Location of erect factor .....9 VI Discussion .,,,.11 VII Summary, X8 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/newtypeoflethalhOOthom 1 I INTRODUCTION The question of the viability of females homozygous for sex -linked lethals was raised by Morgan and Bridges (1916). At that time they were unable to state definitely that a female with such a germinal constitution would not live but they made that assumption. A sex -linked lethal has been found in which the lethal bearing males live to transmit the lethal factor. This has made it possible to test the case and their assumption was found to be correct. About two years ago there appeared in a cross between a wild female and a white ultra-bar several males which bore a new sex-linked character. In this character the wings are held erect over the back, the second pair of legs is function- less, and on the whole, these males resemble flies which have been o vex-* -etherized . When females heterozygous for this char- acter are mated with erect males there appear in the next generation about equal numbers of erect sons, normal sons and normal -appearing females. But there are no erect females. Moreover none of these females have been found to be homozygous for the character and the sex ratio of two males to one female is always obtained in such a cross. The sex ratio is of interest because it is the reverse of the sex ratio found in other sex-linked lethals. It also suggests the lethal (l gd ) described by Miss Stark, in which the lethal bearing males occasionally emerged and lived for a short time, although they were unable to use their legs for walking. The present lethal is similiar in that the lethal "bearing males emerge and the legs are often useless. However in this case the lethal hearing males live to propagate and if mated with females heterozygous for erect the lethal effect is obtained in one half of the females. £ II METHOD OF CULTURE AND MAINTENANCE OF STOCK The flies have been reared by the ordinary method and kept in a room with a controlled temperature of 24 C. When it is desired to examine the flies they are very lightly etherized and the erect flies quickly separated from the non-erects, after which they may be more heavily etherized. This precaution is taken in order to avoid confusion of erect-winged flies with over-etherized flies. This method of separation and classific- ation of erect-winged flies is effective since no fly has been found with normal wings when under the influence of ether which later showed erect wings and conversely no fly classified as having erect wings has later shown the normal wing posture. In matings involving erect the offspring should be shaken out and classified each day if close approximations to expected ratios are desired, since any flies which may die ,due to crowding, cannot be classified. Classifications are made under the low power of a binocular microscope although they can be made equal- ly well with the naked eye. A stock pure for erect is not possible due to the total absence of females homozygous for erect. A stock of erect has been maintained by mating females heterozygous for erect with erect males in each generation. In such a mating one always gets one half erect sons and one half normal sons and a sex ratio of two males to one female. The stock has been examined « in each generation for any marked deviation in the one to two ^ sex ratio and in the percentage of erect males. A close watch has been made for homozygous females. Ill ORIGIN OP PRPCT ! On September P, 1919, in a. cross between a wild female and J a white ultra bar male there were noticed several males crawl- ing about the bottle with wings erect over the thorax as in over-etherized flies. This day’s count of offspring consisted of 35 normal -winged females, 10 normal -winged males and 14 erect males. This female evidently was heterozygous for erect and since she was a virgin picked from a wild stock the character derived from her cannot be said to have arisen by hybridization of two stocks but from a pure wild stock. It may be of interest to note in connection with Miss Stark’s work (1915) on lethals from freshly caught and inbred stocks that the wild stock in which this erect lethal arose had been in captivity for at least three or four years. The erect males which must have been present in earlier counts of the original cross were overlooked probably because they were supposed to be over-etherized flies. The resemblence of these erect males to over-etherized flies is striking. In the character ’’erect" it is the raesothorax which seems to be affected most because the wings are held erect over the back and the second pair of legs is usually doubled up beneath the body or else dragged along behind (figure 1). The wings stand at right angles with the main axis of the body and they usually are about parallel but occasionally touch or form an j acute angle. The wings come into position as they expand and 4 remain so throughout the life of the fly, thus making flight impossible. No males have been found that transmit the factor for erect without having erect wings, and conversely no erect males have been found which do not transmit the characteristic. The second pair of legs usually are useless, for walking, as they A are either crossed and doubled up beneath the body or else they drag as the animal walks. Such flies have much difficulty in walking and occasionally become entangled in the food and die. This fact probably accounts partially for th<^erects appearing in somewhat fewer numbers than expected. Dead flies cannot be classified as to the erect character and are discarded. All figures given in this paper refer to counts of living flies. Flies with these feeble legs often partially recover the use of them for walking. In general flies cannot be classified by these feeble legs since they are rather irregular in appearance. They are part of the manif estation of the fa.ctor for erect, because erect flies with normal -appearing legs were selected for several generations, but the majority of the erect-winged males always had feeble legs. With moderate care in etherization erect is a readily recognized sex-linked character which is always definite in'jits behavMfr. A IV SEX RATIOS AND FREQUENCY OF ERECT When females heterozygous for erect are out-crossed to non- erect males the usual 1:1 sex ratio is obtained and there is an approximation to equality of erect and normal males. The totals of such crosses are given in table 1. The scarcity of erect males here is partially accounted for by the number which died before they were counted, as the offspring were not removed daily in every case. « TABLE 1 Heterozygous female X non-erect male. Normal $9 Erect dW Normal eft? Total 1252 573 749 Percentage 48,5 22.3 29.1 Sex Ratio 1 : 1.06 6 If females heterozygous for erect he mated to erect males the characteristic sex ratio of 1:2 is obtained and there are again nearly equal numbers of erect and normal males. The totals of these matings are given in table 2. It can be seen there that tne results indicated by the totals are not the averages of wide- ly varying . ratios , for a close approximation to the expected ratio has been obtained in almost every mating. . pi v/ ji» Erect oc? Normal 76,1 0 102 101 116 84.1 0 30 21 30 88.1 0 111 104 131 86.1 0 52 65 64 90.1 0 80 110 114 92.1 0 99 110 10 5 94.1 0 12 15 9 96.1 0 4 3 3 98.1 0 60 54 64 100.1 0 52 35 48 172.0 0 60 55 82 172.1 0 90 86 87 172.2 0 66 94 93 172.3 0 91 85 120 172.4 0 46 45 36 172.5 0 20 8 12 172.6 0 55 65 100 172.7 0 38 37 51 172.8 0 53 54 61 172.9 0 51 20 23 Total 0 1166 1167 1349 Percentage 0 31.7 31.7 36.6 Sex Ratio 1 : 2.16 Unrelated non-erect females mated to erect males gave in F-]_ equal numbers of normal -appearing females and males. Many of these F 1 females were then tested by unrelated non-erect males and all gave approximately equal numbers of erect and normal sons. This test brings out its characteristic sex -linked behav- /3\i/r. Several thousand flies have been produced in crosses in- volving erect, and a constant watch has been made for homozyg- ous erect females which would indicate crossing-over between a lethal factor and the erect factor, but no such females have been observed. Since the lethal effect and the character erect cannot be separated, it may be concluded that they are due to the same factor. In the second generation from a cross between white bar females and erect males there appeared three females which car- ried their wings erect. These upon being tested proved to be heterozygous for erect but they transmitted this character of erect wings to part of their daughters. Considerable work has been done in testing these erect-winged females and it seems to indicate a dominant factor which makes erect dominant and is lethal in the homozygous condition if one erect factor is present. This new factor seems to be located in the autosomes, and. unlike the erect factor it is quite irregular in its mani- festation since certain environmental conditions seem to be necessary. This new dominating factor is similiar to erect in that it cannot be fixed, at least when the erect factor is present. Homozygous erect females probably die in the egg or early larval stages since no approximation of 2 $% of pupae containing . dead fliee has been found in crosses where they should occur, and no dead larvae noticed in good cultures. V LO CAT I OH OH ERECT FACTOR In order to prove that this erect-winged lethal is a sex- linked character its linkage relations with har and white have "been obtained. White, "bar, normal -winged females were crossed to red, full -eyed, erect males and the TV> generation produced. The double-cross-over class was regarded as a cross-over in each region. The males of this cross show the linkage relations of erect with "bar and white readily and are summarized in tables 3 and 4. There was found to be 36.9^ of crossing -over between white and erect and 19.3^ between bar and erect. These numbers added give close approximation of 56.2^ to the established 5 6 % of crossing-over between white and bar. It seems evident that the factor for erect lies between white and bar somewhere near the locus 38* - < t • • » 1 • . f TABLE 3 Bar-erect crossing-over Cross-over cftr Non -cross -ever cfd” Total 227 952 Percentage 19*3 TABLE 4 White-erect crossing -over Cross-over hlla. Soc. Exp. Biol, and Med. Vol. 17, pp. 10-14. Muller, H.J. 1921 A study of the character and mode of origin of eighteen mutations in the X-chromoeome of Drosoph- ila. Anat, Rec. Vo 1.20, pp.2!3. t 21 Quackenbush, L.S. 1910 Unisexual 'broods of Drosophila* Science Vol* 32, pp* 183-185* Rawls, Elizabeth, 1913 Sex ratios in Drosophila ampelophila* Biol. Bull* Vol, 24, pp. 115-124. Stark, Mary B. 1915 The occurrence of lethal factors in inhred and wild stocks of Drosophila* Jour. Exp* Zccl. V 0 1. 19, pp* 531-558* Stark, Mary B. 1918 An hseeditary tumor in the fruit fly Drosophila. Jour. Cane. Res. V 0 i. 3 s pp. 279-299. Stark, Mary B. 1919 An hereditary tumor. Jour. Exp. Zool. Vol* 27, pp. 509-529. Zeleny, Charles 1920 A change in the bar* gene of Drosoph- ila melanogaster involving further decrease in facet number and increase in dominance. Jour. Exp. Zool* Vol. 30, pp. 293-324. ♦ t . t % « Figure 1. ./In erect male* ( Sketched under camera lucida while lightly etherized.)