University of Illinois 
 
 Library at 
 
 Urbana-Champaign 
 ACES 
 

 <M UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN 
 
 The person charging this material is responsible for its 
 
 dT W Th r retUm t0 the libraf y on or be fore the due 
 aaie. I ne minimum fee for a lo<?t itom io * 
 
 $300.00 for bound journals 
 
 and underlining of books are reasons 
 :tion and may result in dismissal from 
 Please note: self-stick notes may result 
 in torn pages and lift some inks. 
 
 he 
 the 
 
 f - 
 
 ll-free) orcirclib@uiuc edu 
 
 hn e /I^l! n ,l by ChOOSing the M y Accoun option at- 
 http://www.library.uiuc.edu/catalog/ 
 
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 
 
 Agricultural Experiment Station 
 
 BULLETIN No. 134 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER 
 AND ALFALFA 
 
 BY J. W. FOL8OM 
 
CONTENTS OF BULLETIN No. 134 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Introduction 113 
 
 Injury to Clover by Insects 113 
 
 The Failure of the Seed Crop 115 
 
 Control of Clover Insects 117 
 
 Clover Seed-midge, Dasyneura leguminicola 118 
 
 Clover Seed-chalcid, Bruchophagus funebris 125 
 
 Clover Seed-caterpillar, Enarmonia interstinctana 133 
 
 Pea-louse, or Clover-louse, Macrosiphum pisi 138 
 
 Clover Leaf-weevil, Phytonomus punctatus. 155 
 
 Clover Root-borer, Hylastinus obscurus 164 
 
 Clover Hay-worm, Hypsopygia costalis 168 
 
 Clover Leaf-midge, Dasyneura trifolii 171 
 
 Clover Callipterus, Callipterus trifolii 175 
 
 Clover Stem-borer, Languria mozardi 178 
 
 Clover Sitones, Sitones flavescens 184 
 
 Clover-root Mealy Bug, Pseudococcus trifolii 189 
 
 Literature 196 
 
 General Articles 196 
 
 Lists of Species 196 
 
THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND 
 ALFALFA 
 
 BY J. W. FOLSOM, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF ENTOMOLOGY' 
 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 
 
 INTRODUCTION 
 
 This account contains a large amount of new information on the 
 most injurious of the clover insects, and on some of the less important 
 species as well. Unless otherwise indicated, the observations were 
 made by the writer during three summers in which he was employed 
 by the State Entomologist, Dr. Stephen A. Forbes, for the special pur- 
 pose of studying these important insects. 
 
 The volume of the results obtained many of them as yet unpub- 
 lished is due in no small measure to the help of an assistant, especially 
 in the routine work of the insectary; and in this capacity there have 
 served at one time or another, Messrs. E. V. Bronson, E. O. G. Kelly, 
 R. L. Webster, and J. J. Davis. Their names appear later wherever 
 their personal observations have been used. 
 
 The present account contains not only new material, but also every- 
 thing of importance- that has previously appeared in our literature of 
 the subject. The literature is large, but the greater part of it is a mass 
 of more or less useful repetition, which traces back to a few sources. 
 All the original articles are cited in the lists of references, as are also 
 the more useful of the compiled articles. These references, tho not 
 voluminous, are comprehensive, and sufficient to guide one directly to 
 all the authentic sources of information on each subject treated. 
 
 Most of the illustrations were drawn for the State Entomologist 
 by Miss Charlotte M. Pinkerton, Mr. F. Knab, and Mr. W. C. 
 Matthews. Several electrotypes were obtained from the Bureau of 
 Entomology thru the courtesy of the Chief, Dr. L. O. Howard. 
 
 In the account that follows, consideration is given primarily to the 
 insect pests of red clover, and secondarily to those of mammoth clover, 
 white clover, alsike, and alfalfa. The last-named plant, introduced 
 into Illinois some ten years ago, is cultivated here and there in almost 
 every county, and has been adopted as a food plant by a large number 
 of the red-clover insects; but none of them have as yet injured it con- 
 spicuously, so far as the writer has been able to learn. 
 
 INJURY TO CLOVER BY INSECTS 
 
 A field of red clover in full bloom is alive with insects. Such a 
 profusion of insect visitants, both as regards number of individuals and 
 number of species at one and the same time^ is afforded by no other 
 plant that we know of, with the possible exception of alfalfa. In the 
 
 113 
 
114 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 clover fields of the university farm we have taken two hundred species 
 of insects not all of them injurious, tho more than half of them feed 
 on the plant. Adding to these the other species that have been listed 
 as feeding on clovers, vetches, and alfalfa, it is seen that these plants 
 are food for more than two hundred different kinds of insects. A 
 hundred more are predaceous or parasitic on these clover insects, or 
 else feed on animal or vegetable matter in the soil of the clover field. 
 
 No part of the plant escapes attack. The roots are eaten by the 
 larvae and the beetles of the root-borer, as well as by those of half a 
 dozen other species, and are drained of their sap by the mealy bug. 
 The stem is hollowed out by the common stem-borer. Both the stems 
 and the leaves are pierced by many hemipterous insects, especially 
 aphids and jassids, and are eaten by a great variety of caterpillars, 
 beetles, and grasshoppers, as are also the heads of the flowers. The 
 ovule is destroyed by the maggot of the seed-midge, and the developing 
 seed is eaten out by the seed-chalcid. Even clover hay is the special 
 food of a certain caterpillar, hence called the clover hay-worm. 
 
 Some of the insects of the clover field are, of course, beneficial. 
 Such are those that pollenize the flowers, bumblebees and, to some 
 extent, honey-bees, as well as those that act as checks on the injurious 
 insects. 
 
 Most of the clover insects are not limited to clover, but have other 
 food plants as well. The seed-midge and the seed-caterpillar are, how- 
 ever, confined to the clovers, and the seed-chalcid to clovers and alfalfa, 
 so far as known. The root-borer is said to eat peas as well as clover. 
 The hay-worm has been found only on hay as yet, but the moth has 
 been raised from masses of dead grape leaves taken in a vineyard. The 
 leaf-weevil is reported from beans and timothy, as well as clover and 
 alfalfa. The clover-louse has been a pest of the worst kind on peas 
 and has a long list of food plants. Of the less important clover in- 
 sects, a few have no other food plant; but the majority can easily main- 
 tain their existence when no clover is at hand. 
 
 In Illinois, where alfalfa is a recent introduction, its insects are 
 essentially the same as those of red clover, and it has as yet no insects 
 peculiar to itself. The leaf-weevil, seed-chalcid, and root-borer feed 
 on alfalfa, but not enough to have done any damage up to the present 
 time. Even the numerous caterpillars, beetles, and grasshoppers that 
 eat the foliage have not yet injured this newly introduced plant to any 
 great extent. An insect that eats a few alfalfa leaves is not necessarily 
 inflicting permanent injury upon the plant; for, up to a certain point, 
 the plant is injured by leaf -eating insects no more than a fruit tree is 
 injured by pruning. Red clover, also, is such a vigorous plant that it 
 easily withstands or repairs injuries of an ordinary kind. Thus in 
 April, 1907, 25 to 50 percent of the new leaves of red clover were 
 frozen and killed in this region, but the hay crop was as good as ever. 
 The temporary damage was far greater than that ordinarily inflicted 
 by the miscellaneous clover insects leaving out of consideration the 
 seven pests named in the previous paragraph. 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 115 
 
 The combined efforts of all the insects, however, are sufficient to 
 reduce the hay crop materially every year. Aside from the occasional 
 conspicuous injury, there is every year a steady drain on the plant 
 thru the attacks of insects. This annual drain is not noticed for the 
 very reason that it occurs every year. If we could keep all the insects 
 out of the. clover field, we should get more hay. If we could exclude 
 all except the bumblebees and the honey-bees, we should undoubtedly 
 get an immense increase in the yield of seed. 
 
 Those who raise clover seed on a commercial scale owe their suc- 
 cess to methods which operate chiefly against the insect enemies of the 
 seed whether the growers are aware of it or not. Under the same 
 conditions of soil and climate, one man is able to get a good crop of 
 seed and his neighbor is not. The reasons for this are chiefly entomo- 
 logical, as appears in these pages. 
 
 THE FAILURE OF THE SEED CROP 
 
 Many farmers do not attempt to raise their own clover seed. 
 Those who do, get more or less of a crop according to circumstances. 
 Here in the black soil of the corn belt, 1 */2 bushels of seed per acre is 
 about the average yield for red clover (Trifolium pratense) ; the soil 
 is not the best possible for clover ; frequently too little seed is sown ; 
 generally the oats and the wheat are regarded as of more importance 
 than the clover; and always the seed insects ravage the crop unless 
 certain precautions are taken. In DeKalb county the soil is better 
 adapted to clover, and, tho the winter conditions are now and then a 
 little severe for the plant, the farmer expects to get about five bushels 
 of seed to the acre by cutting the hay crop early. Under the most 
 favorable conditions, red clover has yielded eight bushels per acre; I 
 have found records of nine, but the more authentic accounts name no 
 more than eight. 
 
 Many influences, more or less important, combine to reduce the 
 crop of seed. Adverse mechanical or chemical conditions of the soil, 
 or unfavorable conditions of the weather, may prevent the plant from 
 flowering properly. With good conditions of soil and weather, the gen- 
 eral health of the plant may be impaired by fungous diseases of several 
 kinds or by insects, particularly the root-borer, the leaf-weevil, and the 
 clover-louse ; their devastations cause the heads to flower unevenly and 
 imperfectly, and prevent the formation of a large number of heads in 
 the crop directly attacked by them. 
 
 These injuries, due to influences that affect primarily the general 
 health of the plant and secondarily the seed, are easily referable to 
 their respective causes. The worst injuries to the seed are more in- 
 sidious in their nature, and are caused by insects. These injuries are 
 of three classes : ( 1 ) those of a negative kind, due to lack of pollina- 
 tion; (2) the positive injuries due to miscellaneous insects that eat 
 clover heads in an incidental way; (3) the positive injuries caused by 
 insects that feed solely upon clover seeds or florets. The first two 
 groups-are relatively unimportant in comparison with the last. 
 
116 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 1. We should have no red clover seed at all were it not for the 
 operations of the bumblebees and, secondarily, of the longer-tongued 
 honey-bees (those of Italian races), for red clover is incapable of self- 
 pollination. The importance of the bumblebee in the pollination of red 
 clover is so well established as to need no discussion. That of the 
 honey-bee, however, is not sufficiently recognized. The honey-bee pol- 
 lenizes red clover to some extent, even tho its tongue is two millimeters 
 shorter than the average corolla tube. A field of red clover is always 
 thronged with honey-bees if any of them are being kept within a mile 
 or two of the place ; and these bees secure nectar from flowers that are 
 undersized, especially in times of drought, when most of the flowers 
 are smaller than usual ; also from flowers that secrete a copious amount 
 of nectar. Furthermore, the honey-bees, in their attempts to get the 
 nectar, go thru the motions of pollination whether they get any nectar 
 or not, as I have ascertained. 
 
 The lack of seed in the June or early July crop is generally at- 
 tributed to the lack of bumblebees at that time, and rightly so, in my 
 opinion. Occasionally, however, the farmer is surprised to find a pay- 
 ing amount of seed in his first crop. This happened in Illinois in 1906 
 and again in 1907 in various counties in all parts of the state, as I have 
 learned from correspondence and from personal conversation with 
 clover growers at the State Farmers' Institute and elsewhere. This 
 early seed ran one to two bushels to the acre ; some of it was put on 
 the market in Quincy, 111. Only two farmers offered any explanation 
 for the production of clover seed at this untimely season, and they laid 
 it to a "miller" that pollenized the flowers by night unobserved. This 
 miller I am not acquainted with ; perhaps the honey-bees pollenized the 
 flowers. 
 
 Ordinarily, however, we do not expect to get seed from the June 
 crop ; and by midsummer there are always enough bees to pollenize the 
 flowers. The failure of the seed crop need not be laid to lack of pol- 
 lination as yet. In the future, if bumblebees are constantly destroyed 
 we may be obliged to cultivate them artificially and this can be done, 
 if necessary for the welfare of clover. The indiscriminate killing of 
 bumblebees should be stopped. They are the best friends of the clover 
 grower. 
 
 2. The seed crop is diminished to some extent by various grass- 
 hoppers, beetles, and caterpillars that eat the blossoms here and 
 there, and sometimes the green seeds. They prevent pollination and 
 destroy developing seeds in some measure, but can scarcely be guarded 
 against, and need no special consideration. 
 
 3. There are, however, three insects that must be guarded against 
 if one wishes to raise a good crop of seed. These are the seed-midge, 
 the seed-chalcid, and the seed-caterpillar. When clover blooms well, 
 and there is good weather, the failure of the seed crop is to be charged 
 to these three insects, the last of them being the least to blame, as a 
 rule. All three can be controlled by simple methods described later, 
 the most important of these being the early cutting of the hay crop. 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 117 
 
 It seems curious at first sight that an unusually large yield of 
 seed should follow the ravages of the clover leaf-weevil. Yet this has 
 occurred in several instances. Webster observed the fact in Ohio. The 
 explanation is simple, however, in my opinion, for the weevil, when a 
 pest, consumes enough leaf tissue to delay the growth of the plant 
 materially, taking the seed crop out of the reach of its worst insect 
 enemies. The result is the same as that obtained by the seed growers 
 who pasture the clover in May or early June. 
 
 Early pasturing or cutting is the secret of a good seed crop, as the 
 growers in New York, Ohio, Michigan, Canada, and elsewhere have 
 found. The reason for the practice is not universally known, however*, 
 as is evident from the inadequate explanations that have appeared now 
 and then in agricultural publications. For example, Shaw says (Clo- 
 vers, etc., p. 103), "Experience has shown, further, that, as a rule, bet- 
 ter crops of clover seed may be obtained from clover that has been 
 pastured off than from that which has been mown for hay, although to 
 this rule there are some exceptions. This arises, in part, from the 
 fact that the energies of the plant have been less drawn upon in pro- 
 ducing growth, and, therefore, can produce superior seed heads and 
 seed, and in part from the further fact that there is usually more 
 moisture in the soil at the season when the plants which have been 
 pastured off are growing. There would seem to be some relation be- 
 tween the growing of good crops of clover seed and pasturing the 
 same with sheep." The fact is that pasturing gives a good seed crop 
 for the reason that it delays the heading of the plant until a time when 
 the seed-midges and seed-chalcids are no longer on the wing and laying 
 eggs. When precautions are not taken against these pests, they can be 
 counted upon every year to destroy most of the clover seed. In this 
 region the midge and the chalcid eat from 50 to 75 percent of the red- 
 clover seed every year without hindrance. The farmer gets only 
 what the insects leave. If he gets two bushels of seed to the acre, the 
 insects have already eaten from two to six bushels off the same acre. 
 
 CONTROL OF CLOVER INSECTS 
 
 The insect pests of clovers are but seven, and they are within our 
 control if we choose to control them. Moreover, they can be controlled 
 by means that interfere little, if any, with usual farm practice; and the 
 methods of control do not conflict with one another, but are essentially 
 the same for all the clover pests, referring especially to those of red 
 clover. 
 
 The worst of these to deal with, where it occurs injuriously, is the 
 root-borer. If it is very destructive in spring, plow the clover under, 
 for this insect has quite its own way. The other pests can be disposed 
 of without sacrificing the plant. 
 
 If the hay crop is threatened seriously in spring by the leaf-weevil 
 or the clover-louse, pasture it or clip it back in May; otherwise, cut 
 the hay as early as possible, in order to insure a good second growth. 
 Usually, however, these two insects are subdued by natural agencies, 
 in spite of their abundance. 
 
118 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 To get rid of the worst of the seed insects, pasture or clip back in 
 May or early June ; or else cut the hay as soon as possible as soon as 
 it is fresh in bloom, or earlier. 
 
 Cut red clover, or pasture it lightly, in the latter part of the first 
 season, as this goes far to reduce the number of insect pests in the 
 same field the second year, and does not injure the clover if done 
 intelligently. Destroy volunteer clover, which is a rich nursery for all 
 kinds of clover insects. It can be cut most conveniently with the rest 
 of the clover twice a year. 
 
 Do not permit red clover to run for more than two years in this 
 region, where it is, for agricultural purposes, a biennial. 
 
 CLOVER SEED-MIDGE 
 
 Ddsyneura leguminicola Lint. 
 
 (Cecidomyia leguminicola) 
 
 This widely distributed pest, abundant in clover fields, prevents 
 the formation of seed. At the time of blossoming, the florets affected 
 by this insect remain for the most part green and undeveloped, and 
 their ovaries are hollowed out and empty, or else contain each a small 
 orange, pink, or whitish maggot. Having entered the flower-bud, the 
 maggot consumes the fluid contents of the ovary before the bud has a 
 chance to open. Hence the term bud-midge would be even more ap- 
 propriate for this insect than that of flozver-midge recently proposed 
 by Webster. 
 
 The maggots develop into delicate little red-bodied flies, which are 
 so small as easily to escape observation, altho they are very abundant 
 in clover fields at certain periods of the year. 
 
 Distribution. The clover seed-midge has been reported as de- 
 structive in Vermont, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, 
 the District of Columbia, Virginia, Ohio, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Wis- 
 consin, and Nebraska, and doubtless occurs in other states in which 
 clovers are grown. It does great damage in the province of Ontario, 
 Canada, and, according to Miss Ormerod, is also found in England. 
 In Illinois, the pest was observed as long ago as 1878 or 1879 (Fif- 
 teenth Rep. State Ent. 111., p. 3). 
 
 Food Plants. The chief food plant of the species is red clover, 
 but white clover also is affected. The published statement that alsike 
 clover is exempt from attack is incorrect, the writer having reared the 
 midge from alsike. This clover is not badly infested, however, proba- 
 bly because it forms its heads three weeks later than red clover, at a 
 time when there are but few seed-midges on the wing. For the same 
 reason mammoth clover ought to escape severe attack, and such is said 
 by one writer to be the case (Insect Life, Vol. V., p. 74). An implica- 
 tion to the contrary, however, is found in another publication (Bull. 
 116, Mich. Agr. Exper. Station, p. 55). I have had no personal experi- 
 ence with the midge on mammoth clover, but would point out the pos- 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 119 
 
 sibility that the injury in Michigan was done by the seed-chalcid rather 
 than by the seed-midge. 
 
 Alfalfa is not yet known to be a food plant of this insect. 
 
 Descriptions. The egg is barely visible to the naked eye. It is 
 elliptico-cylindrical in form, at most 0.3 mm. long and 0.075 mm. broad, 
 with the shell smooth and transparent. The color is at first a uniform 
 watery yellow, but soon an internal orange spot appears, and finally 
 the egg becomes orange thruout. 
 
 The larva (PI. I., Fig. 1) is a footless maggot, orange-red, pink, or 
 almost white, 2.3 mm. long and one third as broad, when full grown, 
 with the surface of the skin minutely granulate. It has thirteen seg- 
 ments behind the head, and, like other cecidomyiid larvae, bears nine 
 pairs of respiratory tubercles, situated respectively on segment 2 and 
 segments 5 to 12 inclusive. All these tubercles are lateral in position 
 excepting the first and the last pairs, which are dorsal and posterior on 
 their respective segments. A peculiar organ known as the sternal 
 spatula may be detected lying against the ventral face of segment 2, 
 and the form of this organ (PI. I., Fig. 2), while subject to some varia- 
 tion, is sufficiently characteristic to distinguish this larva from that of 
 the clover leaf-midge, the only other insect with which it is likely to 
 be confused. 
 
 The cocoon, made by the larva, is oval in form, 2 mm. long, and 
 composed of silken threads. It is difficult to find out-of-doors owing 
 to its being covered with particles of dirt. The pupa, described in 
 some detail by Comstock, is pale orange, with brown eyes, a pair of 
 short conical tubercles on the front of the head, and a rather long horn 
 near the base of each wing; the antennal sheaths of the cast pupal 
 skin curve outward like the handles of an urn. 
 
 The appearance of the female midge is well shown in Figure 3, 
 Plate I. When on the wing, she is nothing but a filmy speck, that 
 easily eludes the vision. After alighting, her red abdomen and long 
 threadlike legs catch the eye. Under the microscope, the head is seen 
 to be black, and the antennae yellowish red, with sixteen or even sev- 
 enteen- sessile segments. The sides of the thorax are reddish brown ; 
 above, most of the thorax is black, but two small posterior lobes are 
 brownish red; the halteres are reddish yellow. The wings are trans- 
 parent, closely set with short, curved, dusky hairs, and strongly fringed 
 posteriorly with long paler hairs. Legs slender, reddish brown, the 
 segments becoming darker distally. The abdominal segments 1 to 6 
 are salmon-red above, mixed with yellowish beneath ; dorsally each of 
 these segments is banded with black scalelike hairs, which rub off 
 easily. Segments 7 to 10 of the abdomen form the pale yellow 
 ovipositor. The insect, with ovipositor retracted, is 1.8 to 2 mm. in 
 length, and with the ovipositor extruded, 6.2 mm. The antennae are 
 0.8 mm. in length. 
 
 The male resembles the female, but bears a pair of conspicuous 
 clasping organs at the end of the abdomen and has but fifteen antennal 
 segments, all but the first two of which are pediceled. 
 
120 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 We have no other midge that I know of in a red clover field that 
 may be mistaken for the seed-midge, tho in Europe the leaf-midge was 
 originally described from red clover. Both midges affect white clover, 
 however, but can be distinguished by the characters given on page 172. 
 
 Life History. In central Illinois, the clover seed-midge winters 
 as a full-grown larva, or as a pupa, in the soil of the clover field or in 
 dead clover heads. A few warm days and a little rain bring the larvae 
 to the surface of the ground a few days after the red clover has 
 started on its second year's growth. Thus in 1907, in Urbana, the 
 first new leaves of red clover appeared March 19 a little earlier than 
 usual and the orange-colored larvae of the midge were found on the 
 ground from March 25 to April 4, inclusive, being most numerous 
 March 30 and April 2. They are by no means abundant, however, at 
 this time in a clover field of the second year, and would not be present 
 at all but for the precocious development of some clover heads during 
 the preceding season. Some of these larvae make a cocoon and some 
 do not. In either event the larva contracts in length and its integument 
 hardens and becomes duller in color, forming a puparium, within which 
 the pupa develops. One larva, found March 25, 1907, made a cocoon 
 March 30, from which a female midge emerged April 12 or 13. A 
 second larva, taken March 30, formed a cocoon April 2 and gave a 
 female fly April 21. Both of these flies were reared indoors, it should 
 be said. Out-of-doors, midges were not found until May 15, but were 
 common May 23 (at which date oviposition was in progress) and at- 
 tained their maximum numbers May 30. This season was a late one, 
 however, owing to continuous cold weather in April, and in the years 
 1903 to 1906 inclusive the dates of maximum abundance were May 24 
 and 25, the time when young green clover heads also were most numer- 
 ous. The larvae work in the heads during June and the first week of July, 
 and leave the heads when full grown and go to the ground to pupate. 
 Our earliest date for the emergence of larvae from the heads is June 20. 
 Most of the larvae emerge about June 30, tho not a few wait as late as 
 July 8. The pupal period at this time is three weeks or more, and the 
 flies of the second generation are most abundant in the last week of 
 July and the first two weeks of August, tho scattering individuals 
 emerge at almost any other time between the middle of July and the 
 first of September. The egg period in early August is three days, 
 varying a few hours, more or less, according to temperature. Most of 
 the damage to the seed crop is done during the last two weeks of Au- 
 gust and the first two weeks of September, when the larvae are most 
 numerous in clover heads. Most of these larvae pass the winter as 
 larvae or pupae, to emerge as flies the following May. A few larvae, 
 liowever, attain their growth early enough to produce flies in early Sep- 
 tember or even later, out-of-doors. Under the sheltered conditions of 
 the insectary, but without artificial heat, flies appeared as late as Octo- 
 ber 10; and in a warm room flies will emerge from clover sod thruout 
 the winter. It appears that the few flies of late September do not 
 succeed in propagating their kind in this latitude, owing to the direct 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 121 
 
 effect of frost on the flies, but especially to the death of green clover 
 heads before any larvae therein can attain their growth. It is possible, 
 however, that flies of early September produce larvae capable of sur- 
 viving the winter. 
 
 Thus there are in central Illinois two full broods of the seed- 
 midge each year and a feeble third generation of flies, which belong 
 essentially to the May brood of the next year. In the literature we 
 find that maggots of the seed-midge emerged in immense numbers 
 from clover heads in Washington, D. C, on May 23, 1880. This date 
 would be one month too early for such an occurrence in this part of 
 Illinois, where May 23 is ordinarily the time of maximum abundance 
 of the first generation of flies. 
 
 Habits. The eggs are laid always in green flower-heads, and 
 chiefly during the warmer part of the day. With the aid of a haml 
 lens, the process of oviposition can be observed, the female being fre- 
 quently too busy to pay any attention to slight interruptions. The last 
 four segments of the abdomen of the female are elongate like a tele- 
 scope, forming a slender tapering ovipositor, twice as long as the re- 
 mainder of the body and as flexible as a whip-lash. Standing on the 
 outside of a green clover-head, the female inserts this organ among 
 the florets and works it deeper and deeper until it can go no farther. 
 The sensitive tip of the sinuous ovipositor finds a suitable spot for an 
 egg and the female becomes quiet until the egg is laid. The entire 
 process of egg-laying requires usually five minutes, and often ten to 
 fifteen minutes. Tho the same female may lay several eggs in one 
 clover head, she appears to make it a rule to distribute her eggs among 
 a good many plants. Many .females may, of course, oviposit in the 
 same head, with the result sometimes that more larvae hatch than 
 can possibly find food. Thus in one head of eighty florets the writer 
 found 106 eggs. Once in a while an egg is laid on a petal or on the 
 calyx itself, but almost always it is glued to one of the hairs of the 
 immature calyx, the glue often forming quite a perceptible mass. This 
 is contrary to a published statement that the eggs "do not appear to 
 be glued to the hairs." 
 
 The newly hatched larva has only one way of entering the ovary 
 of a flower, namely, by squeezing in between the unopened petals, as 
 Comstock said. Once inside the flower-bud, the maggot, incapable of 
 biting any solid substance, sucks the fluid contents of the ovary, de- 
 stroying the ovule or ovules. An affected floret presents externally 
 a healthy appearance but the petals do not expand, except rarely. 
 They remain fresh and pink until after the maggot leaves the bud, but 
 eventually fade and wither away without opening. 
 
 The simplest way to get specimens of these larvae is to collect 
 clover heads that are partly green and partly in bloom, and to shake 
 them up a little, when many of the larvae will squirm their way out of 
 the buds. The maggots often occur in great numbers on the bed of a 
 hay wagon or the floor of a barn. In a tight glass jar of clover heads 
 all the larvae present will emerge, and the precise amount of infestation 
 can be ascertained. 
 
122 BULLETIN No. 134 [April 
 
 Tho the full-grown larvae may simply drop to the ground, as other 
 writers have stated, they frequently wriggle their way down along the 
 stem of the plant, when the latter is wet with rain. Indeed, the larvae, 
 even when full grown, will not emerge if the air is too dry. Ceci- 
 domyiid larvae in general require considerable moisture for their de- 
 velopment and are very sensitive to the influence of humidity. Dry- 
 ness causes the seed-midge larvae, when on the ground, to squeeze 
 themselves into crevices in the soil and to contract the body and become 
 motionless, as if for pupation. Even then, however, moisture will re- 
 peatedly revive them to a condition of wriggling activity. 
 
 The period of pupation is lengthened by dryness and shortened by 
 moisture. Prolonged dryness kills both larvae and pupae. Qut-of-doors 
 the flies do not emerge during a dry spell ; continuous dry weather 
 will delay their appearance as much as two weeks ; but they may be 
 expected to appear after a rain, in the appropriate part of the season. 
 In the insectary, the emergence of the flies can be similarly controlled 
 by moisture, as G. C. Davis has already noted. t 
 
 Riley states that the pupa works itself thru its cocoon and to the 
 surface of the ground when about to give forth the fly. 
 
 Autumn finds larvae of various sizes in the clover heads, in central 
 Illinois. Most of the larvae become full grow T n and go to the ground 
 in September ; the rest remain in the heads and either finish their growth 
 or else succumb to frost. In spite of frosts, full-sized larvae may be 
 found in the heads as late as the middle of October. October 28, 1907, 
 we found in clover heads several larvae which were so small (0.8 mm. 
 in length) that they must have been derived from late September flies, 
 and they were altogether too small to survive the imminent death of 
 their food plant. 
 
 The recognized injury done by the seed-midge to red clover occurs 
 during the second year of the plant, and the amount of injury increases 
 the longer the plant is allowed to run. 
 
 Vigorous plants, however, form heads during their first year, and 
 in these premature heads not a few larvae of the seed-midge are to be 
 found in autumn. 
 
 Natural Enemies. The chalcid, Bruchophagus (Eurytoma) fune- 
 bris How., at first suspected of being parasitic upon the larva of the 
 seed-midge, is now known to destroy the seed instead of the larva, 
 taking what the seed-midge leaves. 
 
 We have reared from clover heads containing larvae of the seed- 
 midge two as yet undetermined species of the chalcid genus Tetrasti- 
 chus. These are possibly the same two that are mentioned by Webster 
 as having been reared directly from both larvae and pupae obtained 
 about Lincoln, Neb., in December. In Delaware, Sanderson bred from 
 larvae of the seed-midge, in October, 1899, and in June, 1900, parasites 
 determined by Ashmead as Tetrastichus carinatus Forbes and Torymus. 
 
 Another parasite of the seed-midge is Anopedias error Fitch, of 
 the family Platygasteridce, a minute black species, about which almost 
 nothing has been written since Comstock, in 1880, reported it as emerg- 
 ing from the cocoon of the clover seed-midge. 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 123 
 
 An energetic enemy of the seed-midge is the common flower-bug, 
 (Triphleps insidiosus Say), as was found some years ago by Dr. 
 Forbes. I have repeatedly found a nymph or an adult of this bug with 
 its beak thrust into a seed-midge larva or fly. 
 
 Control. It is by no means necessary to abandon temporarily the 
 raising of clover seed on account of this insect, as was once proposed. 
 The most effective and most practicable preventive is that given by 
 Comstock, namely, to cut the first crop of clover as early as possible, 
 in order to secure a good seed crop at the expense of a slight reduction 
 in the hay crop. The good results of this method are frequently ob- 
 tained, unconsciously, by farmers who make it a rule to cut their clover 
 near the 17th of June. The writer was once sent by our State Ento- 
 mologist to examine injured clover on the farm of A. E. Myers, at 
 Millbrook, 111. (Kendall Co.). At that place, August 19, 1903, there 
 were twenty acres of red clover in full bloom, with the heads well filled 
 with sound seed, with few green heads, and with almost no sign of the 
 seed-midge; no eggs were found and only two midges were seen dur- 
 ing an extensive search. This clover had been cut a few days before 
 June 25. Across the -road was another field of red clover, similar in 
 history to the first except that it had not been cut until between July 
 4 and 10. Here none of the clover was in bloom, all the heads were 
 green, and almost every head was loaded with eggs of the seed-midge ; 
 often there were more eggs in a head than there were florets. The 
 flies were abundant also, and were still ovipositing. .In this instance, 
 a difference of two weeks in the time of cutting meant all the difference 
 between almost complete immunity and heavy infestation. 
 
 Early cutting (1) results in the drying up of the food plant and 
 the undeveloped larva, and (2) hastens the development of the second 
 lot of clover heads, so that the midges of the second generation find 
 but few green heads in which to lay their eggs. 
 
 The proper date for early cutting depends, of course, on latitude, 
 weather, and other considerations. It should be not later than June 17 
 in central Illinois, and need not be earlier than June 7. Clover that is 
 cut too green does not cure well, but the cutting need not be done until 
 the field as a whole is fresh with bloom, tho it should not be delayed 
 until the flowers have withered. A clover head half red and half 
 green means that the seed-midge is present (or else the seed-cater- 
 pillar), and the grower who will take the trouble to study the habits of 
 the midge will be able to cut his clover at just the right time to get rid 
 of the seed-midge without losing much of his hay crop. 
 
 Similar results may be had by mowing back the clover as early as 
 the middle of May, in Illinois and Ohio. This delays the heading 
 enough to escape the second brood of flies. 
 
 Pasturing in spring and early summer exterminates the midge and 
 yet insures a good crop of seed, so far as this insect is concerned. This 
 method, as recommended by Dr. Fletcher, has been adopted with great 
 success in Ontario, Can. There the first crop is pastured to cattle or 
 sheep until the beginning of June but not later than the middle of that 
 
124 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 month. In Michigan, also, the same method is successfully employed 
 by dairymen, the clover fields being pastured until the 10th or 15th of 
 June. (G. C. Davis.) 
 
 Contrary to what might be anticipated, the seed-midge neither flies 
 far nor is carried far or in large numbers by the wind. Most of the 
 midges that emerge in a clover field stay there and lay their eggs there. 
 If the wind blows they cling to the clover plants or to the ground, or 
 take but short and occasional flights. The direction of flight is, to be 
 sure, determined by the wind if the wind is strong, and the midges are 
 certainly disseminated more extensively by the wind than by their own 
 powers of flight. Nevertheless, the number of midges carried from 
 one field to another by the wind is, in the experience of the writer, 
 comparatively small. For example, most of the midges in a given 
 field of second-year clover on May 25 came forth in that field and 
 were the offspring of the few midges that entered the same field during 
 the latter part of the preceding year. Hence it would seem to be a 
 wise procedure to prevent the sporadic heading of first-year clover by 
 mowing it back a few weeks after the oats (or other small grains) 
 have been harvested, at a time when the growth is vigorous, but yet 
 sufficiently early to permit considerable further growth before frost 
 sets in. This cutting need not injure the clover. In this state, red 
 clover is not infrequently cut in the latter part of the first season, for 
 a light hay crop, or to prevent premature seeding, and in the good 
 growing season of 1907, some first-year clover hay (mixed with stub- 
 ble) was put on the market. This cutting impairs neither the hay 
 crop nor the seed crop of the ensuing year, provided it is done early 
 enough to allow the plants to recover before winter. Volunteer clover 
 should always be cut, as it affords a rich nursery for all kinds of clover 
 insects." 
 
 Where clover and timothy are mixed, early June cutting will, 
 in this latitude, sacrifice the timothy. To obviate this, pasture lightly 
 or clip back the growth in May. This treatment, as Webster states, 
 brings both the first and the second blooming of the clover too late for 
 the destructive work of the midge, and the hay crop as a whole sus- 
 tains no loss. 
 
 In a few reported instances, larvae of the seed-midge have been 
 found mixed with clover seed in bulk, and the theoretical danger of 
 sowing such larvae along with the seed has been pointed out. While 
 we have no direct evidence as -to the reality of this danger, it would be 
 well, on general principles, to kill such larvae, by drying them up under 
 a gentle heat, which is said not to injure the seed, or by fumigation 
 with bisulfid of carbon. 
 
 Dasyneura leguminicola Lint. 
 
 1879. Lintner, J. A. Can. Ent, Vol. XL, pp. 44, 45, 121-124. 
 Riley, C. V. Rep. Comm. Agr., 1878, pp. 250-252. 
 
 1880. Comstock, J. H. Rep. Comm. Agr., 1879, pp. 193-197. 
 Lintner, J. A. Thirty-ninth Rep. N. Y. State Agr. Soc., 
 
 1879, pp. 37-41. 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 125 
 
 Lintner, J. A. Rep. Ent. Soc. Ontario, 1879, pp. 28-30. 
 
 1881. Lintner, J. A. Fortieth Rep. N. Y. State Agr. Soc., 1880, 
 
 pp. 20-24. Separate, pp. 11-15. 
 
 1882. Saunders, W. Rep. Ent. Soc. Ontario, 1881, pp. 38-43. 
 1885. Fletcher, J. Rep. Ent. Dept. Agr. . Separate, pp. 
 
 12, 13. 
 
 1891. Ormerod, E. A. Fourteenth Rep. Inj. Ins., pp. 23-27. 
 1894. Davis, G. C Bull. No. 116, Mich. Agr. Exper. Sta., pp. 
 
 52-56. 
 1899. Hunter, W. D. Ann. Rep. Neb. State Bd. Agr., 1898, pp. 
 
 247-249. 
 1906. Webster, F. M. Circ. No. 69, U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Ent., 
 
 pp. 3-7. 
 
 CLOVER SEED-CHALCID 
 Brnchophagus funebris How. 
 
 This abundant and energetic chalcid, formerly presumed to be an 
 enemy of the clover seed-midge, is now known to be itself one of the 
 worst of the clover pests. Instead of being parasitic, like most of the 
 chalcids, it eats out the clover seeds .and reduces the seed crop ma- 
 terially. 
 
 The adults little, compact, black, flylike insects are common on 
 clover heads that are fading and ripening. Seeds containing the larvse 
 of this chalcid become brown, brittle, and hollow, and when the clover 
 is threshed, the empty shells left by the adults are swept away with 
 the chaff. 
 
 Not until 1896 was this ubiquitous insect suspected of being a 
 clover pest, and up to the present time its life history and habits have 
 remained almost a blank, except for what E. S. G. Titus has written. 
 The present account makes considerable additions to the knowledge 
 of the subject. 
 
 Distribution. Vermont, Rhode Island, New York, Delaware, Dis- 
 trict of Columbia, Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, 
 Michigan, Kansas, Mississippi, Minnesota, Colorado, California, Ore- 
 gon, and Washington. Most of these records are from Titus, who 
 reared the insect from clover heads obtained from various states. 
 
 Food Plants. Red clover is the chief food plant, tho crimson 
 clover is badly affected, according to Hopkins. Alfalfa is another food 
 plant, but one of minor importance in my experience. I have not 
 found the chalcid on white clover, but have seen the adults on mam- 
 moth clover. 
 
 Injury. It was A. D. Hopkins who found that this chalcid eats 
 the seed, instead of being a parasite upon some insect. 
 
 The larva requires a seed that is going to grow, and this need is 
 provided for by the egg-laying habits of the female. She does not lay 
 her eggs in green heads, but selects, primarily, heads that have just 
 
126 
 
 BULLETIN No. 134 
 
 [April, 
 
 begun to wither, and, secondarily, heads that are in full bloom. Some- 
 times I have seen her trying in vain to thrust her ovipositor into a seed 
 that had hardened. The young larva feeds upon the semifluid albumen 
 of the cotyledons of the seed; as the seed hardens, the jaws of the 
 larva harden also, and at length the larva has eaten out the interior of 
 the seed, leaving only a thin shell. Externally, an affected seed looks 
 unhealthy. Instead of being blue, or clear yellow tinged with red or 
 purple at the end, and plump, it is dull brown, often misshapen and a 
 little undersized. At threshing time some of the adults have issued, 
 leaving only the shells of the seeds, and these shells blow away, making 
 an unaccountable shortage in the yield; other seeds, that still contain 
 the insect, may remain behind with the sound seeds, but are of course 
 good for nothing. These seeds that contain the insect are not neces- 
 sarily so light that they blow off with the chaff, as one writer has 
 assumed; many of them, if not most of them, are heavy enough to 
 stay with the sound seeds, as I have often found. The empty shells 
 are swept away. From newly threshed seed the adults may continue 
 to emerge in swarms, as R. H. Pettit noticed. Thus the yield of seed 
 is reduced in amount, and part of the yield made valueless, by this 
 insect. 
 
 August 1 we examined 49 seeds taken at random, and found 35 
 to be sound and 14 to be infested by the chalcid ; of the latter, 3 were 
 
 empty, 6 contained each a 
 larva, 4 a pupa, and 1 an 
 adult. Titus has found 
 seed injured to the extent 
 of 40 to 85 percent, with 
 an average of 50 percent to 
 the head. 
 
 Without examining the 
 seeds there is no way of 
 telling whether the chalcid 
 is present or not, for the 
 rest of the plant shows no 
 indication of the presence 
 of the pest. 
 
 Stages. The adult (Fig. 
 1) is a minute, compact, flylike insect, mostly black, but with parts of 
 the legs yellowish brown. It is small the female being 1.9 mm. in 
 length and the male 1.7 mm. yet its actions on a clover head are so 
 characteristic that one who has made the acquaintance of the insect 
 can recognize it at once. Apart from its natural surroundings, how- 
 ever, one must look to certain minute details of structure in order to 
 determine the species. 
 
 In the genus Bruchophagus the marginal vein is linear and not 
 longer than the stigmal vein; the mesonotum is umbilicately punctate, 
 and the abdomen ovate, pointed, and compressed in the female. The 
 male resembles the female but lacks the point to the abdomen, and the 
 
 FIG. 1. Clover Seed-chalcid, Bruchophagus funebris; 
 adult female. (Webster, Circ. 69, Bur. Ent, U. S. 
 Dept. of Agriculture.) 
 
1909] 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 
 
 127 
 
 abdomen is shorter than in the other sex ; while the male, unlike the 
 female, has oval funicle segments and long antennal hairs. 
 
 The male of this particular species, funebris, is black and non- 
 metallic. Eyes dark brown, antennae almost as long as the thorax; 
 flagellum of eight segments, there being five in the funicle and three in 
 the club; the funicle segments have each a short apical peduncle, and 
 all but the first of these segments have either two or three whorls of 
 yellowish hairs usually three on the second segment of the funicle 
 and two on segments three to five. The knees, anterior tibiae, and all 
 the tarsi are light yellowish brown. The stigma of the wing gives off 
 a feeble branch. The abdomen, joined to the thorax by a short, stout 
 peduncle, is small, being less than half as long as the thorax, and its 
 fourth segment is the largest. 
 
 The female is like the male in coloration but is larger, with these 
 distinctive characters. Antennal segments not petiolate, and without 
 the long hairs; flagellum of nine segments, the funicle having six and 
 the club three. Abdomen not pedunculate, 
 longer than the thorax, with the fourth and 
 fifth segments short and subequal, and with a 
 light brown pointed extremity a part of the 
 ovipositor. 
 
 FIG. 3. 
 
 FIG. 4. 
 
 FIG. 2. Clover Seed-chalcid, 
 Bruchophagus funebris, 
 eggs. Greatly enlarged. 
 
 Clover Seed-chalcid, Bruchophagus funebris: Fig. 3, larva, 
 and head at right; Fig. 4, pupa. (Webster, Circ. 69, Bur. 
 Ent., U. S. Dept. of Agriculture.) 
 
 The egg (Fig. 2) is broadly elliptical to ovate in form, ending 
 anteriorly in a small papilla and prolonged posteriorly as a slender 
 tube, at least twice as long as the egg proper, which averages 0.26 mm. 
 in length. The egg when laid is translucent whitish, and smooth ; 
 within a day, the appendage shrinks and turns brown. 
 
 The maggotlike larva (Fig. 3) is white, stout, and footless, with a 
 small head; length, when full grown, 1.5 to 2 mm. The larva shows 
 few distinctive characters, tho it is stouter and less active than para- 
 sitic larvae of the same family. 
 
 The pupa (Fig. 4) is for a time white, but darkens as the color 
 of the imago develops; length 1.9 mm. 
 
 Life History. In 1904 and 1905 we made daily observations on 
 the number of adults emerging from clover heads collected thruout the 
 season and kept in large glass jars each lot having been collected at 
 one time and place. The observations when plotted on coordinate 
 paper showed several new things. 
 
128 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 Beginning April 14, there was a gradual increase in the number 
 of emergences up to June 6 and 12; then a rapid decrease to July 6; 
 afterward a sudden rise from August 4 to a high maximum August 10, 
 followed by a rapid drop to August 24, after which date adults issued 
 constantly, but in moderate numbers, until October 15. Out-of-doors 
 the adults do not begin to emerge until about May 15, as a rule, and in 
 1907 no adults were seen until May 23, tho the clover fields had been 
 searched almost every day for them. The June and August dates of 
 maximum emergence in the insectary agreed with the dates of maxi- 
 mum abundance in the field. One year, however, I found the chalcids 
 common July 6 to 19, and very common about July 15, tho in most 
 years there are but two times of greatest abundance, and these are when 
 faded clover blossoms are most numerous in the fields of cultivated 
 clover. Some adults can be found, however, almost any day in the 
 season from May 15 to October 15, or later, especially on volunteer 
 clover, where they can always find heads in just the right condition for 
 oviposition. 
 
 The insect passes the winter inside the seed, on the ground. The 
 seeds that we have collected and examined in early March contained 
 larvae only ; in late autumn the seeds taken from dead clover heads on 
 the ground contained many larvae and now and then a pupa. Evidently 
 the species winters chiefly, if not almost entirely, as. a larva, in this 
 region. 
 
 As the first period of egg-laying extends over a month or more, 
 there is a corresponding range in the time of emergence of the second 
 lot of adults. Thus, clover heads collected June 18 gave adults June 
 21 and every day from July 4 to July 20. 
 
 More than this, there occurs a surprising extension of the period 
 of emergence. For example, heads collected June 21, 1904 (Urbana, 
 111.), gave adults June 24; July 2, 4, 5, 6; August 9, 10, 11, 12, 13; 
 then no more until the next year, 1905, when more adults issued May 
 27, 30, and June 5. Thus the last adults appeared almost a year later 
 than the first ones all these from eggs laid inside a period of one 
 month. One to nine individuals issued on each of these dates, and the 
 majority issued during the first year. 
 
 Compare this record with the above: Heads collected June 28, 
 1904 (De Kalb Co., 111.) gave adults (in Urbana) July 2 (5 individu- 
 als) ; August 8 (1), 12 (4), 15 (1), 19 (1), and no more until 19G5 ; 
 then adults issued May 30 (2), 31 (2) ; June 1 (11), 2 (2), 3 (2), 5 
 (11), 6 (24), 7 (8), 8 (3), 9 (9), 10 (4), 12 (35), 13 (10), 14 (12), 
 15 (18), 16 (8), 17 (8), 19 (7), 20 (2), 22 (2), 24 (2), and none 
 thereafter. Here, the great majority failed to emerge until the follow- 
 ing year. Usually it is the other way. 
 
 By July 15 or a little earlier, new eggs begin to be laid in the new 
 growth of red clover the seed crop. We collected an immense num- 
 ber of clover heads July 28, 1904, which gave adults as follows : Au- 
 gust 5 (many), 7 and 8 (194 individuals), 9 (42), 10 and 11 (13), 12 
 (103), 13 (23), 14 (6), 15 (31), 16 (6), 17 (2), 18 (1), 19 (3), 22 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 129 
 
 (8) ; then no more until 1905, when a few issued May 24 (2), 29 (3), 
 June 5(1), 7(1); then no more observations ceasing August 8. In 
 this case, the majority emerged near the middle of August and the 
 minority waited until the next year. 
 
 Taking heads collected still later in the season August 26, 1904 
 these gave imagines August 30 (a few), 31 (a few), September 1 
 (few), 2 (few), 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 
 25, 26, 29, October 6 (one individual on each of these last dates, with 
 two exceptions) ; then, in 1905, May 12 (5), 16 (many), 19 (many), 
 20 (8), 23 (1), 26 (1), June 2(1), and no more up to September 1, 
 when the daily observations were discontinued. 
 
 Heads collected September 7 gave a few adults in September and 
 October, but very many more in the following April and May. 
 
 Heads collected September 16, October 3, 17, and 27, gave no 
 adults until the following April, May, and June, when large numbers 
 issued. 
 
 In the last three instances most or all- of the adults did not issue 
 until the next year. Thus the time of emergence is delayed in propor- 
 tion to the lateness of oviposition. 
 
 These records are by no means exceptional ; they are typical ; those 
 given here were selected from some twenty as being the most complete 
 and most significant for present purposes. 
 
 To summarize: The May and June adults lay their eggs in the 
 first growth of second-year red clover, and most of the adults derived 
 from these eggs appear in July and August, but some of them do not 
 issue until the following May or June. The July and August adults 
 lay their eggs in the second growth, and some of the adults from these 
 appear during the same season ; the rest not until the following year. 
 The later the eggs are laid the larger the proportion of individuals to 
 lie over until the next year. The adults have two times of greatest 
 abundance, falling near June 12 and August 12 .respectively. This 
 does not mean only two generations, however, but, instead, two lots of 
 individuals. The first lot (June 12) is derived from eggs laid thruout 
 the previous season. The second lot (August 12) has no accessions 
 from the previous year, but is, nevertheless, composite in its nature, 
 for it consists of adults of both the second generation and the third. 
 I have traced as many as three generations per year, and there is 
 clearly a possibility of four. The fact that some members of each gen- 
 eration lie over until the next year complicates the study of the life 
 history. 
 
 At first, it seemed to me at least possible that the prolongation of 
 the period of emergence might really be due to re-oviposition in the old 
 clover heads, even tho the chalcids had been removed every day as fast 
 as they came to light and no copulation had been observed. This as- 
 sumption was dismissed, however, after being tested, for the seeds 
 were all too dry and hard to be penetrated by the ovipositor or to serve 
 as larval food. There remained only the possibility that some chal- 
 cids had emerged soon enough after the clover heads were collected to 
 
130 BULLETIN No. 134 [April. 
 
 find seeds soft enough for oviposition, but this possibility was too slight 
 to account for the immense number of late-emerging chalcids. Fur- 
 thermore, any larvae from eggs laid in the jars of clover heads would 
 soon be disposed of- by the drying and shriveling of the green seeds. I 
 could not find any evidence of re-oviposition. 
 
 There is one source of possible confusion that must be guarded 
 against in studying the life history of this chalcid. There emerges 
 from the clover heads, along with B. funebris, another chalcid, Tetras- 
 tichus bruchophagi Ashm. MS., so named upon the assumption that it 
 is a parasite of the clover seed-chalcid. This Tetrastichus is so much 
 like the Bruchophagus in general appearance that it might hastily be 
 mistaken for the latter, tho many differences between the two appear 
 under the microscope. 
 
 Habits. While the clover heads are green, in spring, few if any 
 of the seed-chalcids will be found ; but when they begin to turn brown, 
 the chalcids appear on them. The males appear four or five days 
 earlier than the females, and both sexes frequent the clover heads, but 
 the males do not rush about and explore the recesses of the clover head 
 in the way that the females do. 
 
 On warm sunny days the chalcids are most active, and then most 
 of the eggs are laid. On rainy days both sexes remain quietly in the 
 clover heads. They make their home among the florets, and there, at 
 length, their dead bodies are to be found. 
 
 Brown ripe clover heads give the female much trouble, for she 
 can not insert her ovipositor into a hard seed ; green heads she passes 
 by; florets in full bloom receive some attention and some eggs; but 
 most of the eggs are laid in florets with withering corollas. 
 
 The males are quick to fly when one brings a hand lens near them, 
 but the busy females occasion the observer less difficulty. The female 
 squeezes in and out among the florets, often working her way deep into 
 the flower head, so that one must cautiously spread the florets apart 
 in order to follow her movements. Every now and then she stops to 
 clean her antennae with the front legs, or her wings and abdomen by 
 passing the hind legs backward. With the tips of her palpitating an- 
 tennae she keeps touching the florets, especially the calyx, as if testing 
 it. At length she proceeds to lay an egg, and usually pierces the side 
 of the calyx tube, tho sometimes she stands on the top of the calyx, 
 between the calyx lobes and the corolla. Bending the end of the abdo- 
 men forward under the body, she releases the long needlelike ovipos- 
 itor and thrusts it into the calyx ; then the abdomen recovers its normal 
 form, but the ovipositor, at right angles to the body, remains inserted 
 in the wall of the calyx, and is pushed and wriggled until its tip has 
 entered the young seed. After three to twelve minutes the organ is 
 withdrawn and rapidly slipped back into place. Sometimes a tiny col- 
 orless drop of fluid is seen at the tip of the ovipositor just before it 
 is thrust into the calyx. 
 
 The observer, having identified the floret during the process of 
 oviposition, can then pry it out with a knife and carry it back to be 
 
1909] THE INSECT PKSTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 131 
 
 dissected under a microscope, if he wishes to find the egg. The egg is 
 found inside the seed in the semifluid albumen. Being translucent and 
 almost colorless, the freshly laid egg transmits the pale green color of 
 the surrounding seed tissue and is inconspicuous ; but as one dissects 
 the albumen carefully, the egg comes out like a lump of jelly, soft and 
 delicate but sufficiently elastic to keep its form. The egg varies con- 
 siderably in shape and must assume its definite form after leaving the 
 ovipositor; for the body of the egg is wider than the channel of the 
 ovipositor, and no distension of the organ is seen during oviposition. 
 It is to be inferred that the egg passes thru the ovipositor in the form 
 of a long thread, the body part of the egg entering the seed first and at 
 once expanding. The usual position of the egg in the seed, with the 
 end of the appendage near the seed coats and the body of the egg 
 farther away, indicates that the body entered first. The appendage 
 probably serves as a reservoir for some of the egg-contents while the 
 egg is going thru the ovipositor. This appendage is empty in the 
 freshly laid egg, and within a day after the latter is laid the former 
 shrinks and turns brown then affording a ready means of locating the 
 egg. Without a careful dissection this delicate appendage will be 
 missed. 
 
 The seeds in which the eggs are laid look sound and healthy and 
 contain no other insect so we have always found. 
 
 The egg, dissected out of a seed, can be kept for some time in a 
 glass tube, upon a piece of moist black paper or a fragment of albumen 
 taken from the seed, and can be examined daily under the microscope 
 in order to determine the egg period. We kept eggs in this way for 
 thirteen days, after which they appeared to be dead. Another way is 
 to take a large number of seeds from florets in which the females were 
 seen to oviposit, and to dissect these at successively longer intervals 
 from the time of oviposition, making sure that there is not more than 
 one egg in each seed. By this method I found that eggs laid July 22 
 were unhatched and apparently sound thirteen days afterward, but then 
 the material gave out, and I do not yet know precisely the duration of 
 the egg stage. 
 
 The larva when full grown fills the seed, leaving only the shell 
 intact. 
 
 The adult emerges thru an irregular hole, generally at the top of 
 the seed (as the seed stands in the calyx). In one instance I saw such 
 a hole in the seed when the seed contained not an adult, but a pupa. 
 The opening was no doubt made by the larva but was probably acci- 
 dental for among phytophagous chalcids in general the exit opening 
 is bitten out by the adult, not by the larva. 
 
 Natural Enemies. In company with the seed-chalcid, there 
 emerged frequently, in our jars of clover heads, a second black chalcid 
 which might casually be mistaken for the first species, tho belonging to 
 another genus Tetrastichus. The species is T. bruchophagi Ashm. 
 MS., as determined from specimens named by Ashmead himself, and 
 obtained by Mr. R. L. Webster from Prof. Lawrence Bruner. The 
 
132 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 specific name may or may not prove to be appropriate in its meaning. 
 At present I know of no direct evidence that the Tetraslichus feeds on 
 the seed-chalcid, but the parasitic habit of other members of the 
 genus, and the association of this species with the seed-chalcid, in the 
 apparent absence of other possible hosts, leads one tentatively to regard 
 the Tetrastichus as an enemy of the destructive clover seed-chalcid. 
 
 Control. All things considered, the shortage of the seed crop, as 
 a constant occurrence, is due chiefly to the seed-midge and the seed- 
 chalcid, in this state. Probably the midge is a little more injurious 
 than the chalcid; at least, the larvae of the former are a little more 
 abundant than those of the latter. 
 
 The chalcid has not attracted the attention that it will from eco- 
 nomic entomologists, and nothing in the way of preventive measures has 
 been proposed except the cautious statement by Webster that the same 
 means recommended for the midge might apply to the chalcid, and that 
 the destruction of outstanding clover heads and the burning of chaff 
 and stems after hulling would in all probability greatly reduce the 
 numbers of the insect. 
 
 It is safe to say that early cutting in June would undoubtedly pre- 
 vent a great amount of oviposition, S.nd if done as soon as the field 
 came into bloom, would not only forestall most of the oviposition, but 
 would also dispose of any eggs or young larvae that might already be 
 present in the tender green seeds ; for the green unhardened seeds dry 
 out and shrivel up soon after the leaves and stems dry. Moreover, 
 early cutting of the hay crop would hasten the maturity of the seed 
 crop in a way to prevent most of the midsummer oviposition ; not all of 
 it, of course, for some chalcids would be on the wing whenever the 
 clover heads ripened. It is true, however, that the life history of the 
 chalcid has become adapted to that of red clover as it is usually cul- 
 tivated, and that the two periods of maximum abundance of the chal- 
 cid coincide with those of the greatest abundance of ripening clover 
 heads; and it follows that the methods given would largely derange 
 this adjustment. 
 
 The fact that the insect passes the winter inside the seeds on the 
 ground indicates plowing under as a preventive. This is ordinarily 
 done anyway after the second year of the clover, and when done at the 
 usual time as early as practicable in spring the plowing doubtless 
 buries most of the insects beyond the possibility of emergence. 
 
 In first-year clover the chalcid lays eggs in such heads as may be 
 present in -the latter part of the season, and these heads are often 
 numerous. Their seeds, falling to the ground, furnish no small pro- 
 portion of the chalcids that appear in the same field the following May 
 and June. It would seem wise, therefore, to clip off or pasture off the 
 heads of first-year red clover. In fact, something of a fodder crop 
 can be obtained in the latter part of the first season without injury to 
 the plant, if the cutting is not done too late in the season. 
 
 Volunteer clover is always infested by the chalcid, as well as by 
 other pests, and ought to be destroyed. 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 133 
 
 I have several times examined commercial clover seed and found 
 some of it injured by this insect, but the inmates of the seeds always 
 happened to be dead. There is a strong possibility, however, that new 
 clover seed takes the living insect to the field. Such seed, if sown 
 broadcast, would permit the adults to emerge ; but if drilled in, would 
 dispose of the chalcids, as they could scarcely make their way to the 
 surface. 
 
 Bruchophagus funebris How. 
 
 1880. Howard, L. O. Rep. [U. S.] Comm. Agr., 1879, p. 196. 
 1896. Hopkins, A. D. Bull. No. 6, U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. Ent., 
 p. 73. 
 
 1898. Hopkins, A. D. Bull. No. 17,- U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. Ent., 
 
 p. '45. 
 
 1899. Pettit, R. H. Bull. No. 175, Mich. Agr. Exper. Sta., pp. 
 
 366, 367. 
 1904. Titus, E. S. G. Bull. No. 44, U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. Ent., 
 
 pp. 77-80. 
 1906. Webster, F. M. Circ. No. 69, U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Ent., 
 
 pp. 7-9. 
 
 CLOVER SEED-CATERPILLAR 
 
 Enarmonia inter stinctana Clem. 
 
 (Grapholitha interstinctana) 
 
 In its ability to diminish the seed crop, this pest ranks with the 
 seed-midge and the seed-chalcid. Attacking a clover head that is 
 green or partly in bloom, the little caterpillar eats out a cavity in the 
 head, destroying many of the unopened buds and some of the tender 
 green seeds, and spoiling the head as a whole. When no young clover 
 heads are at hand, the caterpillar feeds on tender green leaves at the 
 crown of the plant. 
 
 The adult is an inconspicuous little brown moth of the family 
 Tortricida, and may be recognized by means of its peculiar silvery 
 markings. 
 
 Distribution. The published records show that this insect is pres- 
 ent in Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Washington 
 (D. C), Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, and Michigan. It 
 probably occurs in other states. In Illinois it is well established thru- 
 out the state, holding its own every year, and becoming locally abun- 
 dant now and then. 
 
 Food Plants and Injuries. The chief food plant is red clover, but 
 white clover is also affected, and we have reared the species from 
 alsike. Lintner quoted a correspondent to the effect that mammoth 
 clover was not touched by a certain insect which Lintner (Eleventh 
 Report, p. 153) took to be the seed-caterpillar. The correspondent's let- 
 ter evidently refers, however, not to this insect at all, but to the seed- 
 chalcid. There appears to be no reason why mammoth clover should 
 
134 BULLKTIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 be exempt from the seed-caterpillar, and we have actually found it on 
 so-called mammoth, which appeared to be a cross between mammoth 
 and the common red clover. 
 
 Hatching usually near the base 'of a green clover-head, the larvn 
 eats into the head, destroying the green florets as it goes. A small 
 green head is often destroyed entirely, before it is many days old; a 
 larger head is injured only locally at first, remaining green on one 
 side, while the other and unaffected side may come into full bloom 
 (PL L, Fig. 9). To judge from the external appearance of the head, 
 either the seed-caterpillar or the seed-midge larva might be the author 
 of the mischief, and both are often present at the same time. A midge 
 larva, however, is hidden away in the ovary of a single floret, while the 
 seed-caterpillar makes a large dirty excavation involving many florets, 
 and is readily brought to light by tearing open the clover head. The 
 caterpillar attacks particularly the bases of the florets, and eats every- 
 thing, including *the semifluid ovules ; occasionally it eats a soft green 
 seed but it does not eat into seeds that have hardened. Not infre- 
 quently two larvae are found in the same head. Even when the direct 
 injury is confined to a portion of a clover head, the entire head is 
 ruined, for it at length dries up and loses the rest of its florets, leaving 
 only the dead brown receptacle. 
 
 Less conspicuous, tho not inconsiderable, is the injury at the 
 crown of the plant, done chiefly in September and October, by cater- 
 pillars of the same species feeding on the young leaves. 
 
 The total amount of injury by this insect is, of course, variable. 
 In New York, Comstock once found 15 to 20 percent of the heads of 
 red clover infested. In Michigan, Webster saw clover injured to the 
 extent of 95 percent. In Iowa, Gillette, Osborn, and Gossard have 
 found the severest kind of infestation. While not sufficiently abun- 
 dant to attract attention, the insect is, nevertheless, the unsuspected 
 cause of a considerable reduction in the seed crop; for the destruction 
 of one head by a caterpillar means a loss of more than one hundred 
 seeds. 
 
 Stages. The egg, hitherto undescribed, is at first green, then yel- 
 lowish, white, and is almost orbicular as seen from above, tho it is 
 flattened ventrally ; the surface is finely granulate and iridescent. The 
 dimensions are as follows : length, 0.275 mm. ; width, 0.26 mm. ; and 
 height, 0.21 mm. 
 
 The full-grown caterpillar, 7 or 8 mm. long, has the usual five 
 pairs of prolegs. The color varies in accordance with the nature of 
 the food (green tissue, or red floral tissue) from dirty white, tinged 
 with green, to orange, as in Figure 10 of Plate I. The alimentary canal 
 with its greenish or purplish contents shows thru the translucent skin 
 and shifts in position as the caterpillar moves. The head is dark 
 brown and polished, caudate occipitally, and deeply immersed in the 
 prothorax. Prothoracic shield yellowish with a brown posterior bor- 
 der interrupted by a median line of white ; or else dark brown with a 
 clear median line. The body bears not a few pale stiff hairs, and the 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 135 
 
 dorsal piliferous tubercles are arranged, as Comstock noted, in two 
 pairs, those of the anterior pair being closer together than those of the 
 posterior pair. 
 
 Comstock has already described the pupa in detail. Essentially, 
 it is 5 mm. long, brown, with the wing-cases and the dorsum of the 
 thorax darker than the rest. There are two transverse rows of teeth 
 on the dorsum of all the evident abdominal segments except the last, 
 and the blunt anal segment bears posteriorly six stout blackish ex- 
 curved hooks, and several delicate hooked filaments. 
 
 The oval white silken cocoon, 10 mm. long, is usually inconspicu- 
 ous on account of the particles of excrement or bits of floral tissue 
 attached to it. 
 
 The adult (Plate I., Fig. 11), expanding only 8 to 10 mm., is a silky 
 dark brown moth, with brilliant silvery markings that are quite char- 
 acteristic. The most conspicuous marks are those that make the two 
 parallel crescents when the wings are closed. Along the anterior bor- 
 der of the front wing are eight silvery marks (sometimes nine) in 
 form and position as shown in the figure. In fresh specimens the 
 front wings show a few patches of iridescent scales. The hind wings 
 are dark brown, with pale fringes. 
 
 Life History. Our field and insectary observations show that 
 there are three generations of this species every year, without much 
 overlapping of the broods. Here, the moths of the first generation be- 
 gin to emerge from the pupae May 15, attain their maximum numbers 
 May 24 (along with the clover seed-midge), and disappear during the 
 last of June. In 1907 a late season we saw no moths until May 21, 
 and they were most numerous May 30. The moths of the second gen- 
 eration appear in the form of a few scattering individuals as early as 
 June 25, but most of them are on the wing during the third week of 
 July, and a few battered specimens linger over into the first week of 
 August. The moths of the third generation appear as early as Au- 
 gust 19, become abundant by August 30, continue to emerge as late as 
 September 12, and die off by the last of September. Some margin 
 a few days should, of course, be allowed for these dates, which are 
 here given as they appear on our note-slips. 
 
 Eggs laid September 2 hatched September 7. The larval period 
 is from one month to five weeks. The pupal period in July is between 
 two and three weeks. It is possible to find larvae of various sizes at 
 any time from the last week of May until winter sets in, tho larvae are 
 few and far between when the moths are most numerous. 
 
 The moths of the third brood lay their eggs at once, and these 
 hatch in five or six days; but the further life history becomes twofold, 
 depending on where the eggs are laid. In the insectary the moths lay 
 their eggs preferably on young clover heads, but if not supplied with 
 these they oviposit erratically on fresh or dead leaves or stems. Out- 
 of-doors in September and October the larvae occur in two situations ; 
 either in immature clover heads, or at the crown of the plant. In the 
 clover heads active larvae can be found thruout October, in spite of the 
 
136 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 frost, and a large proportion of these doubtless succeed in pupating 
 before winter overtakes them. In the insectary, pupation in October 
 is the rule. Larvae which hatched September 7 spun cocoons October 
 14, and pupated October 16. One larva pupated September 2, and the 
 moth emerged June 27. 
 
 The fate of the larvae that feed at the crown of the plant in au- 
 tumn is rather uncertain. The earliest ones probably pupate, and some 
 of the remainder very likely survive the winter as larvae. We have not 
 been able as yet to find any of the larvae in early spring, but in Iowa, 
 following a year of heavy infestation, Gossard found full grown larvae 
 under rubbish and manure, and partly grown larvae still in the crowns 
 of the plants, April 22, tho the number found was only 25 percent of 
 that found the preceding autumn. 
 
 Habits. The moths appear in spring along with the first green 
 heads of the red clover. When disturbed they take short rapid zigzag 
 flights and come to rest on a clover plant. In the hot sunlight they 
 seek the shaded side of a stem or the under side of a leaf, but in the 
 cooler and darker parts of the day and in cloudy weather they often 
 alight in full view, and close the wings, forming a little brown triangle 
 marked with a silvery double crescent as in Figure 11, Plate I. 
 
 The moth, upon alighting, has the peculiar habit, already remarked 
 by others, of whirling about in a circle several times, with the head as 
 a pivot, and then reversing the movement before settling to rest. No 
 explanation for this performance is evident. 
 
 Osborn and Gossard have reported the moths as being especially 
 active in early evening, when they hovered over the clover blossoms 
 in such numbers as to form a perfect cloud between the observer and 
 the sun. 
 
 In clover that is forming heads, nearly all the larvae are at work 
 in the heads, but a few are present in unexpanded leaf-buds, eating out 
 the interior tissue. 
 
 In first-year clover that has not headed, and in second-year clover 
 that has been recently cut, the eggs are laid, singly a's usual, on young 
 stems and leaflets at or near the base of the. plant, where the larvae 
 hatch and remain. 
 
 In first-year clover with oats, the moths are abundant in the new 
 growth after harvest. Such was the case in a field in Urbana August 
 30, 1907, at which time none of the new growth had headed. In an 
 adjoining field of second-year clover, the heads of which were nearly 
 all brown, the moths had disappeared, leaving the seed-chalcid in 
 charge of the crop. In September, a good many green heads occur on 
 first-year clover, and in these the moths lay eggs rather abundantly. 
 Volunteer clover is always infested by the seed-caterpillar. 
 
 The cocoon is spun in a clover head or at the surface of the 
 ground, according to the situation of the larva. Comstock gives twenty 
 to thirty days as the pupal period, and mentions that the pupa works its 
 way out of the cocoon before giving forth the moth. Osborn and Gos- 
 sard have found the pupa-cases in abundance on the ground, from 
 which a brood had just issued. 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 137 
 
 Natural Enemies. We have reared several braconid and ichneu- 
 monid parasites of the seed-caterpillar which await authentic determin- 
 ation. The following species have been published as parasites of this 
 host: the ichneumonid Glypta leucozonata Ashm. (Proc. U. S. Nat. 
 Mus., Vol. XII., 1889 [1890], p. 449), reared in Missouri by Miss M. 
 E. Murtfeldt; the braconid Phanerotoma (Sigalphus) tibialis Hald. 
 (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., Vol. IV., 1849 [1850], p. 203), raised in 
 Washington, D. C, by Comstock; and a second braconid, Microdus 
 laticinctus Cress. (Can. Ent., Vol. V., 1873, p. 53), recorded from 
 Missouri, Iowa, Canada, and elsewhere. In Iowa, Osborn and Gos- 
 sard have reared the last in abundance from cocoons of the clover 
 seed-caterpillar, and have found that it corresponds exactly with its 
 host as regards the number and the duration of the broods. 
 
 Gossard expresses the presumption that the braconid Bracon ver- 
 noni(s Ashm. (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Vol. XL, 1888 [1889], p. 619) 
 is a parasite of E. interstinctana in Iowa, since it is associated with the 
 latter species in marked numbers and corresponds closely with it in 
 time of appearance. 
 
 Control. The best remedy for the attack of the seed-caterpillar is 
 that proposed by Comstock, namely, to cut and store the hay crop 
 early in June (New York, Illinois, Iowa), just as advised for the seed- 
 midge, in order to kill the larvae while still in the heads. The hay 
 should be handled lightly and stacked or stored as soon as possible. 
 Osborn and Gossard have attested the value of this method, and have 
 given these further recommendations : ( 1 ) cut volunteer clover in early 
 June and dispose of the heads speedily; (2) do not allow clover to run 
 for more than two years ; (3) sow seed on land remote from old fields ; 
 (4) pasture clover in the fall of the first year; (5) plow an old clover 
 field under in October or November or in early spring, then harrow and 
 roll. These practices operate at the same time against several other 
 clover pests. 
 
 Enarmonia (Grapholitha) interstinctana Clem. 
 
 1860. Clemens, B. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., p. 351. 
 1881. Comstock, J. H. Rep. U. S. Comm. Agr., 1880, pp. 254, 
 255. 
 
 1891. Osborn, H., and Gossard, H. A. Insect Life, Vol. IV., 
 
 pp. 56-58. 
 Osborn, H., and Gossard, H. A. Bull. No. 14, Iowa Agr. 
 
 Exper. Sta., pp. 166-169. 
 Osborn, H., and Gossard, H. A. Bull. No. 15, Iowa Agr. 
 
 Exper. Sta., pp. 260-262. 
 Osborn, H., and Gossard, H. A. Twenty-second Ann. 
 
 Rep. Ent. Soc. Ontario, pp. 74, 75. 
 
 1892. Gossard, H. A. Bull. No. 19, Iowa Agr. Exper. Sta., pp. 
 
 571-589. ' 
 
 1896. Lintner, J. A. Eleventh Rep. State Ent. N. Y., pp. 152- 
 156. 
 
138 
 
 BULLETIN No. 134 
 
 [April, 
 
 PEA-LOUSE, OR CLOVER-LOUSE 
 
 Macrosiphum pisi Kalt. 
 (Nectarophora destructor) 
 
 This is a big, green, long-legged plant-louse that has ruined mil- 
 lions of dollars' worth of field peas and a great deal of red clover. It 
 is the dominant species of its 
 kind on these plants (Fig. 5) 
 and can scarcely be confused 
 with any other aphid. 
 
 Distribution. This pest 
 was, in all probability, intro- 
 duced with clover and peas 
 from Europe, where it is 
 widely distributed and com- 
 mon, tho it is reported mostly 
 from England, Germany, 
 France, and Italy. In the 
 United States it has been in- 
 jurious in Maine, New Hamp- 
 shire, Vermont, Massachu- 
 setts, Connecticut, New York, 
 New Jersey, Pennsylvania, 
 Delaware, Maryland, the Dis- 
 trict of Columbia, Virginia, 
 North Carolina, Ohio, Illinois, 
 Michigan, Wisconsin, Minne- 
 sota, Nebraska, Iowa, Ken- 
 tucky, and Texas. It is wide- 
 spread in Canada also, occur- 
 ring in Nova Scotia and New 
 Brunswick and westward thru Ontario. 
 
 Not until 1899 did the louse attract the attention of American 
 entomologists; in that year an outbreak in Maryland was reported 
 upon by W. G. Johnson. He and E. D. Sanderson have written most 
 of the literature on the species. 
 
 Our personal observations of several years, made as independ- 
 ently as possible, have yielded many facts that were already known 
 and many that are new. The present account refers especially to the 
 insect as it occurs in Illinois. In the eastern states the insect is chiefly 
 a pest on peas. Here, where peas are not grown extensively, it is 
 a pest on red clover. 
 
 Food Plants and Injury. Under the name of "green dolphin" 
 this aphid has long been known in Europe for its injuries to peas and 
 vetches, and in minor measure to clovers and various weeds some 
 forty plants in all. 
 
 In America the aphid has done immense damage to peas and 
 clovers. It affects especially leguminous plants, but numbers also 
 
 FIG. 5. Clover-louse, Macrosiphum pisi, on sterns 
 of red clover. Natural size. 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 139 
 
 among its food plants many weeds of diverse families. The more 
 important of its food plants are red clover, crimson clover, field 
 pea, sweet pea, vetches (known also as "tares"), beet, lettuce, shep- 
 herd's purse, and nettle, not to mention the rest of the weeds. Alfalfa 
 seems to be immune from attack. Thirty sweeps of the net in red 
 clover yielded 3000 of the aphids, while the same number of similar 
 sweeps in an adjoining field of alfalfa gave only 30. This alfalfa 
 was mixed with some clover, however, and observations on the few 
 lice that could be found on the alfalfa failed to find them in the act 
 of feeding. On soy-beans growing next to heavily infested clover, 
 not a single louse was found. Where crimson clover is grown, the 
 aphid prefers it to red clover, it is said. 
 
 Where peas are grown, the aphid winters in a field of clover or 
 on weeds (as a wingless female or as an egg), and in spring is con- 
 fined to these until the peas start to grow, and then it does not get 
 to the early varieties, tho it devastates the late-sown peas. In early 
 spring most of the aphids are wingless and remain where they happen 
 to be, but in late spring (May 1, Delaware) and early summer there 
 are many winged females that can go from clover to peas and start an 
 infestation. The first aphids select the youngest leaves and shoots, but 
 eventually the lice cover the entire plant and sap out its life, rendering 
 it unfit even for fodder. 
 
 In Wisconsin the louse was noticed in a five-hundred acre field of 
 peas about July 20; in less than a week all the plants were dead and 
 brown. In Maryland in 1899, the louse destroyed peas valued at 
 $3,000,000, conservatively estimated, and in 1900, $4,000,000 worth 
 were destroyed. 
 
 On red clover, the youngest leaves and stems are the first to be 
 attacked, and these wither and die if many aphids are present. Wilted 
 leaves mark the spread of the pest over the plant. Red clover, how- 
 ever, can stand a good deal of this injury, and if a heavy rain happens 
 to occur when the plant is covered with the lice, they are washed off, 
 and the field is safe for the rest of the season. There are also numer- 
 ous insect enemies and a fungous disease, which kill off immense num- 
 bers of the lice. At times a combination of circumstances occurs, how- 
 ever, under which the plant is killed, root and all. The natural checks 
 upon the increase of the aphid may be insufficient; but dry weather 
 seems to be the most important factor. Without rain the plant can 
 not replace the sap taken by the aphids, let alone make any growth ; in 
 dry weather the fungus can not develop ; and in the absence of heavy 
 rains to wash them off the plants, the aphids thrive. In dry weather, 
 when the plants are loaded with lice, the cutting of the clover is the 
 last straw. 
 
 In 1903 the louse killed an immense amount of red clover, and 
 weakened much more, in De Kalb county. Being sent there by the 
 State Entomologist, I found on the farm of Mr. A. E. Myers, at Mill- 
 brook, August 19, eighty acres of dead clover roots in one field. Not 
 one root in a thousand showed any signs of life, and on the ground 
 were thousands of the cast skins of the aphid. At cutting, the lice had 
 
140 BULLETIN No. 134 [April. 
 
 been such a nuisance that the men objected to handling the crop. After 
 cutting, the clover never revived. In neighboring fields there were 
 many bare spots where the aphid had killed the clover locally, and in 
 the growing clover were many centers of new infestation, due doubt- 
 less to migrant winged females. All the clover in that part of the 
 county was more 'or less injured; not only old clover, but also the first- 
 year growth. Returning to the same region the following summer, to 
 see the consequences of the injury, I did not stay long, for it was hard 
 to find a field of clover anywhere. The farmers reported that the 
 clover had been "winter-killed," to their surprise, since the winter had 
 not been a severe one and the clover had often survived worse winters. 
 The failure of the clover had discouraged almost all of them from 
 sowing a new crop. My personal opinion was that the "winter-killing" 
 would not have occurred had not the plants been weakened previously 
 by the aphid. Clover is undoubtedly injured by certain winter influ- 
 ences, especially by being "heaved" out of the ground by frost, but 
 there must be taken into consideration also the inability of the plant to 
 face the winter when it has been ravaged by such insects as the aphid 
 or the root-borer. 
 
 Only at rare intervals t has there been a bad outbreak of this spe- 
 cies. In England, according to Kirby and Spence, the havoc wrought 
 by this aphid in 1810 was remarkable for its suddenness. Equally un- 
 anticipated was the outbreak of 1899 in some of the Atlantic states 
 and in Canada. In 1900 the devastation continued in places where the 
 previous injury had been worst, and a new outbreak occurred in Wis- 
 consin. Since then no reports of serious damage have been published, 
 but in Illinois this aphid was locally injurious in 1903, as just de- 
 scribed, and has menaced the red clover every year from 1903 up to 
 the present. Heavy rains subdue the louse almost every year. 
 
 Description. The clover-louse is noticeably larger than any of 
 the other aphids that frequent the field, the largest females being 6 mm. 
 from tip to tip. The green color of the louse matches that of its food 
 plant. The legs are conspicuously long, and the tarsi, distal ends of 
 the tibiae and femora, as well as the tips of the cornicles, are fuscous. 
 The antennae are darker at the joints, with the terminal filament fus- 
 cous. The eyes are red and prominent. With this general statement 
 we may pass to a more detailed description of the species. 
 
 The generic term Nectarophora is antedated by Macrosiphum 
 (Pergande, Bull. 44, Div. Ent, U. S. Dept. Agr., pp. 13, 14). 
 
 With the other species of its genus, M. pisi has the front of the 
 head concave, with a large pair of tubercles supporting the antennas. 
 The antennas, legs, cornicles, and abdominal stylus are exceptionally 
 long in this genus as compared with other genera of aphids. The wings 
 are large, the third discoidal vein has two forks, and the stigma is 
 elongate-lanceolate. The terminal po'rtion of the sixth antennal seg- 
 ment is very long and bristlelike. Most of the species of Macrosiphum 
 are large and frequent herbage. 
 
 On the basis of Sanderson's studies we are obliged to regard this 
 aphid (the N. destructor of Johnson) as the common M. pisi, of Eu- 
 rope, described long ago by Kaltenbach. 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 141 
 
 The alate viviparous female (PI. II., Fig. 1) is 4 to 5 mm. long, 
 with an occasional maximum of 6. mm., and 1 to 1.5 mm. broad. An- 
 tennae long, reaching to the tip of the stylus or a little beyond; first 
 and second segments short and close to the tubercle; third to sixth 
 segments related in length respectively as 3:2: 1.5:4, the terminal fila- 
 ment of the sixth segment being three times as long as the base. Wing 
 expanse about 1 1 mm. Fore wing 5 mm. by 2 mm. Cornicles slender, 
 cylindrical, and long, 1 to 1.5 mm. Abdominal stylus half as long as 
 the cornicles. 
 
 Sanderson gives, smaller measurements thruout for the autumn 
 winged viviparous female, it being only 3.15 mm. in length, with pro- 
 portions varying a little from those just given. 
 
 The apterous viviparous female (PI. II., Fig. 2) is a little larger 
 than the winged female, ranging in length from 4 to 6 mm., and the 
 body is more elongate and fusiform, with longer cornicles (1.25 to 2 
 mm.) and a longer stylus. This form also is smaller in autumn, as 
 Sanderson has noted, with much more extensive dark brown or black- 
 ish markings on the appendages. 
 
 The oviparous female is apterous. 
 
 The egg has not been described before. It is elliptical, twice as 
 long as broad (0.5 mm. by 0.25 mm.), and changes from saffron-yellow 
 to shiny black one or two days after being laid. 
 
 The winged male is 2.5 mm. in length, with a wing expanse of 9 
 mm. It may be recognized by its smaller size, among other things. The 
 color tends toward pale green or yellow. The dorsal sclerites are dark, 
 as is also the mesosternum, and there are lateral blackish spots in front 
 of the cornicles. Sanderson has described this form. 
 
 Our insectary notes on one pair of M. pisi taken in coitu refer to 
 the male as being apterous. 
 
 In autumn many of the aphids normally turn yellow; in fact, 
 some yellow individuals can be found at any time, and aphids that are 
 diseased usually do become yellow. 
 
 Life History. The clover-louse winters both as a large wingless 
 viviparous female and as an egg, but the eggs are not numerous. 
 Many of the females are killed off during the winter. The survivors 
 are easily found under rubbish in the clover field in the first week 
 of April and even as early as March 25, tho they are a little slow to 
 revive. They crawl to the clover plants and proceed to suck the sap 
 and to bring forth living young, all of which are also females ; indeed, 
 no males appear until the last of the season and no eggs are laid until 
 then. During most of the season there is nothing but a constant suc- 
 cession of females, all of them born alive. Most of them are wingless, 
 tho in any of the generations there may be some females that have 
 wings; these also bear their young alive. 
 
 The eggs that were laid on green leaves or stems the preceding au- 
 tumn hatch a few days after the red clover starts on its new growth. 
 March 23 Mr. E. O. G. Kelly found newly hatched young on a clover 
 plant, and egg-shells close by on old dead clover leaves. One of these 
 aphids, kept on potted clover, produced her first young April 5, and 
 died May 12, after having brought forth ninety -young. 
 
142 
 
 BULLETIN No. 134 
 
 [April, 
 
 Mr. R. L. Webster carried thru the season successive generations 
 derived from a single female that came from the egg March 23, and 
 obtained (by breeding always from the first-born) as many as seven- 
 teen generations, the young of the seventeenth brood issuing Septem- 
 ber 21 to October 3. In the field, newly born young can be found as 
 late as November 4, tho we can not name the generation to which they 
 belong. His more important data may best be given in the form of a 
 table. 
 
 M. pisi 
 
 Genera- 
 tion 
 
 Birth 
 
 Maturity 
 
 Death 
 
 Days to 
 mature 
 
 Days of 
 life 
 
 Number 
 of young 
 
 1 
 
 Mar. 23 
 
 Apr. 5 
 
 May 12 
 
 13 
 
 50 
 
 90 
 
 2 
 
 Apr. 5 
 
 Apr. 25 
 
 May 12 
 
 20 
 
 37 
 
 87 
 
 3 
 
 Apr. 26 
 
 May 8 
 
 May 13 
 
 12 
 
 17 
 
 25 
 
 4 
 
 May 8 
 
 May 20 
 
 June 16 
 
 12 
 
 39 
 
 89 
 
 5 
 
 May 20 
 
 May 31 
 
 June 9 
 
 11 
 
 20 
 
 49 
 
 6 
 
 June 1 
 
 June 10 
 
 June 20 
 
 9 
 
 19 
 
 41 
 
 7 
 
 June 10 
 
 June 19 
 
 July 17 
 
 9 
 
 37 
 
 37 
 
 8 
 
 June 19 
 
 July 1 
 
 July 17 
 
 12 
 
 28 
 
 60 
 
 9 
 
 July 1 
 
 July 10 
 
 Aug. 2 
 
 9 
 
 32 
 
 63 
 
 10 
 
 July 12 
 
 July 22 
 
 Aug. 3 
 
 10 
 
 22 
 
 30 
 
 11 
 
 July 22 
 
 Aug. 3 
 
 Aug. 15 
 
 12 
 
 24 
 
 44 
 
 12 
 
 Aug. 3 
 
 Aug. 11 
 
 Aug. 16 
 
 8 
 
 13 
 
 34 
 
 13 
 
 Aug. 11 
 
 Aug. 21 
 
 Aug. 30 
 
 10 
 
 19 
 
 16 
 
 14 
 
 Aug. 21 
 
 Sept. 1 
 
 Sept. 5 
 
 11 
 
 15 
 
 8 
 
 15 
 
 Sept. 2 
 
 Sspt. 12 
 
 Sept. 15 
 
 10 
 
 13 
 
 10 
 
 16 
 
 Sept. 12 
 
 Sept. 21 
 
 Oct. 4 
 
 9 
 
 22 
 
 S3 
 
 Ave 
 
 rapes 
 
 
 
 11 
 
 25.4 
 
 46 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The averages are worth notice. A female begins to reproduce 
 eleven days after birth, as a rule; this accounts for the large number 
 of generations. The average number of young is not large for an in- 
 sect, for insects as a whole average at least two or three hundred eggs 
 per female. The average given in the table is confirmed by one based 
 upon a large number of additional observations taken thruout the 
 season. A female is, however, capable of producing as many as 147 
 young, and many of the females at death have embryos of various 
 stages in their bodies. 
 
 The largest number of young produced in one day by one female 
 is 13, and the average number 6, in our experience ; while the bearing- 
 period of the female averages 12.1 days. In October and November the 
 females bear but few young, but some of these females hibernate and 
 produce more young the following year. 
 
 Our breeding experiments, it should be said, were conducted in- 
 doors, where the aphids were protected from every source of danger. 
 Out-of-doors the mortality would probably not be so small. 
 
 R. L. Webster's continuous observations on the life history are a 
 useful addition to our knowledge of the species. His results are cor- 
 roborated by those of Mr. E. Q. Snider, who, while a student at the 
 
1909] 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 
 
 143 
 
 University of Illinois, made a similar series of studies. He began with 
 the first hibernating females that he could find, and traced their 
 progeny. One of the females found April 8 brought forth the first 
 young aphid April 17, and this acquired wings April 29. In the field I 
 have seen winged individuals at all times up to November 10. 
 
 Five apterous viviparous females studied by Snider bore, respect- 
 ively, before the end of June, 104, 108, 110, 124, and 147 young. The 
 last number is unusually large even for an aphid. 
 
 Males and oviparous females were not found until October (with 
 one exception a female born September 22) ; and males were taken in 
 the field October 10, 17, 20, and November 3. Copulation was observed 
 in the field October 20 and November 3 ; in the last instance oviposi- 
 tion began twenty-five minutes after copulation ceased. Six females 
 began to oviposit, respectively, October 18, 20, 21, 31, and November 
 3 and 4. One female in coitu October 20 laid eggs October 26 (2 
 eggs), 29 (1), 31 (2), November 3 (1), 4 (1), 5 (1), 6 (2), 18 (2), 
 and no more up to December 2, when the observations ended. A fe- 
 male born September 22 laid an unfertilized egg October 18. A female 
 taken in the field October 11, 1904, laid eggs October 21, which hatched 
 March 23, 1905. The eggs have escaped the notice of previous ob- 
 servers. Here, the eggs are common. 
 
 Habits. When these aphids are as yet few, they select the young- 
 est leaves and stems of the plant, especially the under sides of the 
 leaves; but as they increase, they spread over the plant, and may 
 crowd together so closely that large numbers fall to the ground for 
 want of standing room. 
 
 The rapid increase in the number of individuals is not due to any 
 extraordinary prolificacy, but results from the rapid growth and conse- 
 quent early maturity of each aphid and from the fact that almost every 
 individual is a female. 
 
 While the aphid is growing, the moults occur at short but variable 
 intervals, as appears in the following table made from R. L. Webster's 
 notes. 
 
 'M. pisi 
 
 No. of 
 
 genera- 
 tions 
 
 Born 
 
 First 
 moult 
 
 Second 
 moult 
 
 Third 
 moult 
 
 Fourth 
 moult 
 
 First 
 young 
 
 1 
 
 March 23 
 
 March 28 
 
 March 31 
 
 April 2 
 
 April 4 
 
 April 5 
 
 1 
 
 March 23 
 
 March 25 
 
 March 31 
 
 April 4 
 
 April 9 
 
 
 2 
 
 April 5 
 
 April 9 
 
 April 12 
 
 April 15 
 
 April 21 
 
 April 25 
 
 2 
 
 April 5 
 
 April 10 
 
 April 13 
 
 April 18 
 
 April 21 
 
 April 26 
 
 3 
 
 April 26 
 
 April 29 
 
 May 1 
 
 May 3 
 
 May 5 
 
 May 8 
 
 4 ; May 8 
 
 May 12 
 
 May 15 
 
 
 
 May 20 
 
 5 
 
 May 20 
 
 May 22 
 
 May 23 
 
 May 25 
 
 May 28 
 
 May 31 
 
 6 
 
 June 1 
 
 June 3 
 
 June 5 June 7 
 
 June 9 
 
 June 10 
 
 7 
 
 June 10 
 
 June 12 
 
 June 13 
 
 June 15 
 
 June 17 
 
 June 19 
 
 9 
 
 Julyl 
 
 JulyS 
 
 July 4 
 
 July 6 
 
 July 7 
 
 July 10 
 
 9 
 
 Julyl 
 
 July3 
 
 JulyS 
 
 July 6 
 
 July 10 
 
 July 11 
 
144 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 Thus there are four moults, or five instars, and the mother does 
 not reproduce until after the last moult. 
 
 Another student (J. P. Gilbert) found five moults in one instance: 
 an isolated female, born June 20, moulted June 23, 26, 27, 29, and 30. 
 Each cast skin was removed as soon as found, and five of them were 
 found. 
 
 More interesting than the number of moults is the fact that the 
 females reproduce for many successive generations without the aid of 
 the male -a normal phenomenon among aphids, and many other in- 
 sects as well and also the fact that the young are born alive. This 
 can easily be witnessed, as aphids are so numerous. In this species 
 the young aphid emerges hind end first and back upward, and envel- 
 oped in a delicate membrane, which it gets rid of by means of vigorous 
 kicking. The entire process, requiring ten or fifteen minutes, is essen- 
 tially as described elsewhere and in more detail for other species. 
 
 The mother does not wander much after beginning to reproduce, 
 but stays in one spot, with the younger of her progeny clustered 
 around her. 
 
 The winged females, which may occur in any of the seventeen or 
 more generations, are the chief means of spreading the specie^. They 
 are feeble of flight, but are often assisted by the wind to reach distant 
 places. 
 
 Fertilization is evidently essential to the production of an egg 
 that will hatch, tho eggs are laid whether fertilization has occurred or 
 not. The deposition of an egg requires about seven minutes, as noted 
 by E. O. G. Kelly, who observed also that the female used her hind 
 legs to assist the egg out. A fluid that accompanies the egg serves to 
 glue it to a green leaflet, on either side of which the egg may be laid. 
 The eggs remain over winter on the dead leaves or stems on the 
 ground. 
 
 In November there are still many mature females in the field, and 
 they feed on mild days, crawling under shelter when the weather turns 
 cold. If clover sod is brought indoors during the winter, the females 
 appear with the new growth and the plants soon become overrun with 
 aphids. Out-of-doors, most of the hibernating females meet their 
 death sooner or later during the winter, in this region, notwithstanding 
 the fact, reported by W. G. Johnson, that the species can survive 
 severe freezing. 
 
 Natural Enemies. The most important enemy of this louse is a 
 common fungus, Empusa aphidis. It is wide-spread in the United States 
 and Canada, and affects a great variety of aphids, its abundance, when 
 it occurs, being proportional to that of its host. It does not appear in 
 dry weather but is common after a rain or two at any time during the 
 growing season, and is most abundant under the combined influences 
 of moisture and warmth. Then it sweeps off myriads of aphids. 
 Those killed by the epidemic remain clinging to the plant in a more or 
 less lifelike attitude, but turn yellow and then light brown, become 
 swollen, and eventually coated with the fungus (PI. II., Fig. 3). The 
 
1909] 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 
 
 145 
 
 appearance of the insect is at first similar to that caused by the pres- 
 ence of a larval Aphidius in the body of the aphid. The parasite, 
 however, at length spins a silken cocoon under the aphid, and when- 
 ever present can easily be found by dissection. 
 
 The life history of this fungus is like that of E. sphcerosperma, as 
 given in some detail in the account of the clover leaf-weevil, and is 
 discussed at length by Thaxter in the Memoirs of the Boston Society 
 of Natural History, Vol. IV., 1888, pp. 175-177. 
 
 Macrosiphum pisi is affected, directly or indirectly, by a large 
 number of other insects, of which other writers have recorded twenty. 
 These and thirteen additional species are listed below. 
 
 Gryllida 
 
 CEcanthus confluens H. & H. 
 
 MS. 
 Pentatomidce 
 
 Podisus maculiventris Say 
 (= spinosus Dall.) 
 
 Euschistus variolarius P. B. 
 Acanthiidce 
 
 Triphleps insidiosus Say 
 Chrysopidce 
 
 Chrysopa oculata Say 
 
 Chrysopa rufilabris Burm. 
 
 Chrysopa plorabunda Fitch 
 Syrphidce 
 
 Ocyptamus '(Baccha) fusci- 
 pennis Say 
 
 Platychirus quadratus Say 
 
 Syrphus americanus Wied. 
 
 Syrphus ribesii L. 
 
 Allograpta obliqua Say 
 
 Mesogramma marginatu'm 
 Say 
 
 Mesogramma politum Say 
 
 Sphserophoria cylindrica Say 
 Ichneumonidce 
 
 Bassus Isetotorius Fab. 
 
 Coccinellidce 
 
 Megilla maculata DeG. 
 
 Hippodamia glacialis Fab. 
 
 Hippodamia convergens Guer. 
 
 Hippodamia tredecimpuncta- 
 ta L. 
 
 Hippodamia parenthesis Say 
 
 Coccinella novemnotata Hbst. 
 
 Coccinella sanguinea L. 
 
 Adalia bipunctata L. 
 
 Chilocorus bivulnerus Muls. 
 Lampyridce 
 
 Podabrus rugulosus Lee. 
 Cecidomyiidce 
 
 Diplosis sp. 
 Braconidce 
 
 Perilitus americanus Riley 
 
 Trioxys (Praon) cerasaphis 
 Fitch 
 
 Aphidius fletcheri Ashm. MS 
 
 Aphidius washingtonensis 
 
 Ashm. MS. 
 Chalcididce 
 
 Isocratus vulgaris Walk. 
 
 Pachyneuron syrphi Ashm. 
 Acarina, Rhyncholophidce 
 
 Rhyncholophus parvus Banks 
 
 Most of these species I have studied in Illinois in their relation 
 to M. pisi. Below is a summary of all that we know on the subject 
 up to the present date. All these insects, concerned in one way or 
 another with the clover-louse, are either predaceous or parasitic. 
 
 Coccinellidce. The omnipresent ladybird beetles and their larvae 
 are in this region the most efficient of the insect enemies of the clover- 
 louse. The larvae in particular destroy the louse in immense numbers. 
 They are by no means limited to this aphid, but when it predominates, 
 the number of Coccinellidce present is a good measure of the abun- 
 dance of the louse. 
 
146 
 
 BULLETIN No. 134 
 
 [April, 
 
 FIG. 6. Ladybird, Megilla maculata: a, larva; b, empty 
 pupal skin; c, beetle. (Chittenden, Circ. 43, Bur. Ent., 
 U. S. Dept. of Agriculture.) 
 
 The hemispherical, brightly colored ladybird beetles (Fig. 6) are 
 familiar, tho their larvae are not so generally recognized. The ento- 
 mologist knows them as 
 active little alligator-like 
 creatures, with a long 
 warty or spiny abdomen. 
 Some of them are black- 
 ish, but most of the com- 
 mon kinds are spotted 
 with conspicuous colors. 
 The pupa is attached by 
 the tail to a silken support 
 spun by the larva on a 
 green leaf or other object. 
 Its period is four to eight 
 days, usually five or six in 
 July, in the case of several 
 of our common species. The yellow elliptical eggs, laid in small clus- 
 ters, are conspicuous on green leaves and elsewhere. 
 
 Coccinellidce in general hibernate as beetles, and all the species 
 mentioned here do so. They are among the first insects to appear in 
 the warm days of late March and early April. Comparatively few at 
 the opening of the season, they multiply rapidly, tho in this respect 
 they lag somewhat behind the plant-lice on which they feed, if the 
 latter are at all numerous. Coccinellidce feed also on scale insects, 
 pollen grains, spores, etc., as Forbes found (Bull. No. 6, 111. State Lab. 
 Nat. Hist., 1883, pp. 33-64), but feed chiefly on plant-lice, and thus 
 are beneficial. 
 
 Adalia bipunctata and Hippodamia glacialis were not often met 
 with in the clover field, and Coccinella sanguined was not numerous. 
 Chilocorus bivulnerus, well known as a destroyer of scale insects, was 
 rather common at times as an enemy of the clover-louse. The other 
 species listed above were always common. C. g-notata we noted as 
 emerging as a beetle June 29, July 16 and 18 ; C. sanguined, June 23 ; 
 H. ij-punctata, July 15, 16, and 18; M. maculata, June 20, 21, 22, 
 and 24; H. parenthesis issued July 1, 2, and 5, from pupae found June 
 27 ; and eggs of this species, found June 14, hatched June 20, one of 
 the larva? pupating July 11 and giving the beetle July 15. 
 
 All the species listed were actually seen feeding upon M. pisi, 
 ejther in the field or in the insectary. In the latter place, the diet of 
 three Megilla maculata beetles included also (to their discredit) one 
 coccinellid pupa, one adult C. sanguinea and two beetles of their own 
 kind, besides some of their own eggs and (to their credit) eggs of the 
 Colorado potato-beetle that were offered to them. 
 
 Perilitus americanus, a braconid parasite of the beetle of Megilla 
 maculata and now and then of C. p-notata, we reared several times 
 from the former host. Parasitized beetles taken on clover leaves June 
 17, gave the winged braconid June 21 and 22; others, of June 23, gave 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 147 
 
 the adults June 30. My own experience with the parasite leads me to 
 take no exception to the accounts already published by Riley (Insect 
 Life, Vol. I., pp. 101-104, 338, 339) and by Weed and Hart (Psyche, 
 Vol. V., pp. 188-190). Briefly, it may be said the beetle is found 
 standing on a leaf and looking quite natural ; indeed, it can still move 
 some part of itself in most instances, tho it can not move away from 
 the spot, for it is held by its feet to a brown mass of silk a cocoon, 
 from which the parasite will emerge in its winged form. The beetle 
 may remain alive in this condition for two weeks and doubtless a 
 little longer, but when disentangled from its foothold it is unable to 
 move its legs in coordination is unable to walk. 
 
 The larva that made the cocoon has issued from the beetle and 
 could previously have been found inside the host, but some mystery 
 exists as to where the larva makes its exit, for the shell of the beetle 
 appears to be unbroken. 
 
 This Perilitus, then, is a check upon the beneficial ladybird beetle, 
 but is of no practical importance on account of its infrequency. 
 
 On many occasions I have seen adults of Podisus maculiventris 
 (spinosus) and Euschistus variolarius sucking the pupae of various of 
 the coccinellids that prey upon the clover-louse. The eggs of both 
 these pentatomids are heavily parasitized by a proctotrypid. 
 
 Syrphidce. Among the commonest insects of the clover field are 
 several species of Syrphida, or flower-flies (Fig. 7, 8), some of which 
 are known also as "sweat bees." Many of these flies are banded with 
 black and yellow, and have the habit of poising over this or that spot 
 for a few moments and making short dashes from one place to another. 
 The flies lay their eggs in or near colonies of plant-lice, upon which 
 the larvae are to feed. The larvae are leechlike in form, and generally 
 green, yellow, or mottled brownish in color. They are often seen 
 among the aphids, which they destroy at a rapid rate. The syrphid 
 larva seizes an aphid between its hooklike jaws, holds it aloft and 
 sucks the blood from the body, meanwhile waving itself to and fro. 
 When full grown, the larva shortens and its skin hardens into a brown 
 pear-shaped or elongate puparium, from which the fly will issue. 
 
 In this region the flies are seldom noticed in the clover field be- 
 fore the latter part of April, but are abundant by the last of May. 
 The larvae grow rapidly, and there are several generations of the com- 
 mon species each year. 
 
 In Maryland, Johnson found the syrphid larvae to be the most im- 
 portant of the insect enemies of M. pisi, which they nearly extermi- 
 nated in some localities. One pea grower sieved out twenty-five bush- 
 els of syrphid larvae in a few days. 
 
 Allograpta obliqua Say, he found to be by far the most common 
 and most important species, forming the greater bulk of the twenty- 
 five bushels mentioned. He refers to the larvae as being pea-green, 
 slightly streaked with white, and one quarter to one third of an inch 
 in length when full grown. The puparium is usually found on a leaf 
 or stem, rarely on the ground. 
 
148 
 
 BULLETIN No. 134 
 
 [April, 
 
 Sanderson, in Delaware, found almost all the puparia of Allo- 
 grapta obliqua to be parasitized by Bassus latotorius Fab., and from 
 several puparia which seemed to have been parasitized by the Bassus 
 were bred the chalcid Pachyneuron syrphi Ashm. B. latotorius is also 
 parasitized by Isocratus vulgaris Walk., according to Fletcher. 
 
 A. obliqua is a common species in Illinois, where the larva feeds 
 on M. pisi as well as on other aphids. 
 
 Syrphus americanus Wied., one of the largest species of the 
 family, has conspicuous bands of black or yellow, and buzzes like a bee 
 when on the wing. The larva is greenish or mottled brownish, at- 
 tains a length of half an inch or more, and pupates on the plant or 
 a little below the surface of the ground, as Johnson noted. The 
 species deposits a single small oval white egg in a colony of plant-lice, 
 and one of the larvae has been observed to eat twenty-five plant-lice in 
 as many minutes, according to Sanderson. In Delaware, he found it 
 to be extremely abundant as an enemy of M. pisi ; in Illinois, it feeds 
 on the same species and is frequent but not conspicuously numerous. 
 
 Syrphus ribesii L. is reported from Canada, by Fletcher, as an 
 abundant foe of the aphid, and as being attacked by Bassus latotorius, 
 which, in turn, falls prey to the chalcid Isocratus vulgaris. S. ribesii 
 occurs with us, but I have never happened to take it in the clover field. 
 
 Sphcerophoria cylindrica, a small syrphid named by others as 
 affecting M. pisi, is rather common here in aphid-infested clover fields. 
 
 Mesogramma politum (Fig. 7, 8) is frequent in our clover fields, 
 the green larva feeding on the clover-louse. A full-grown larva found 
 on the ground March 27, made its puparium the same day, and the fly 
 issued indoors April 8. 
 
 FIG. 7. 
 
 Syrphus-fly, Mesogramma politum: Fig. 7, adult; Fig. 8 (a), larva, 
 (b) puparium. (Riley and Howard, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture.) 
 
 Mesogramma marginatum has similar habits and is common. A 
 puparium found on a clover leaf June 21 yielded the adult June 22. 
 
 Platychirus quadratus, a small and frequent species, and the less 
 common Ocyptamus fuscipennis, I have taken in sweepings, along with 
 the abundant M. pisi. It is probable that their larvae feed on the 
 clover-louse. 
 
1909] 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 
 
 149 
 
 Various syrphid larvae that destroy M. pisi are themselves attacked 
 by Podisus macidiventris (spinosus) and Euschistus variolarius ; and 
 the eggs of these pentatomids are parasitized by a proctotrypid, Teleno- 
 mus podisi Ashm. (determined by A. A. Girault). 
 
 Chrysopida. A few species of Chrysopa (Fig. 9) are common in 
 the clover field. The adults, known as lace-wing flies, are green or 
 less often yellow, with golden eyes and four similar gauzy wings, finely 
 netted with veins. A few species have a characteristic odor C. ocu- 
 lata, for example. By day the flight is rather sluggish, but toward 
 evening the lacewings become more alert ; they often fly to a light at 
 night. Most of the species hibernate as pupae, so far as is known, but 
 plorabunda winters as an adult. We have often found it hibernating 
 under dead leaves ; then the insect is brown in color. Our species lay 
 
 FIG. 9. Lace-wing Fly, Chrysopa oculata: a, eggs; b, larva; c, foot of same; d, larva 
 devouring pear-tree Psylla; e, cocoon; f. adult; g, head of same; h, adult, natural size. 
 (Chittenden, Circ. 43, Bur. Ent, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture.) 
 
 their eggs each at the tip of a long stiff thread and always in the vicin- 
 ity of plant-lice, which are the chief food of the larvae. In clover 
 fields the eggs are common on leaves or stems, and the larvae eat raven- 
 ously M. pisi and other aphids, and eat one another now and then, 
 particularly when a lot of them issue at the same time from one cluster 
 of eggs. The prey is seized between the points of the long, tapering 
 mandibles of the aphis-lion and the blood is sucked back thru a chan- 
 nel made by a groove along the inner face of the mandible, against 
 which the maxilla fits, to form a closed channel. A newly born larva, 
 
150 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 unless cannibalistic, selects for its first meal a small tender aphid ; 
 under the microscope, one can see the watery juices of the victim bub- 
 bling along the transparent jaws of the captor. These larvae are active 
 creatures, gray, yellowish, or brownish in color, tho colorless at birth. 
 They grow rapidly, and in. one to three weeks spin a silken cocoon by 
 means of glands opening into the rectum. The cocoon, spherical or 
 oval, shows, after the emergence of the adult, a circular lid. 
 
 The Chrysopa larvae are undoubtedly important checks on the 
 clover-louse. In red clover I have found three species, namely, ocu- 
 lata, plorabunda, and rufilabris. The last was not common ; but the first 
 two were numerous, and their larvae were frequently seen feeding on 
 M. pisi, upon which we reared them in the insectary. 
 
 A larva of oculata, taken July 7, spun July 10 or 11 and gave the 
 adult July 27. 
 
 A larva of plorabunda gave precisely the same record. A second 
 larva of this species, taken in a colony of M. pisi, spun July 10, in a 
 bent leaflet, the adult issuing July 20. 
 
 C. rufilabris emerged July 24 from a cocoon found on a clover 
 leaf July 20. 
 
 We have reared no parasites of Chrysopa, but others have ob- 
 tained from cocoons of this genus many species of chalcids and a few 
 ichneumonids, and from the eggs one proctotrypid. 
 
 The most important of the predaceous foes of the clover-louse be- 
 long to the three families just discussed. There remain to be treated, 
 several predaceous species of more or less importance. 
 
 While the seed-midge works havoc in the clover heads, another 
 member of the same family is busily engaged in reducing the numbers 
 of the clover-louse, at least in Canada, for all that we know about this 
 helpful but undetermined species of Diplosis is what Dr. Fletcher 
 learned at Ottawa, where in 1900 it was by far the most inveterate 
 enemy of M. pisi on pea-vines. These minute orange maggots would 
 transfix an aphid, hold it up, and suck out the blood, in much the same 
 way as the syrphid larvae. Their growth was so rapid as to result in 
 several generations during the season. Winter was passed in a minute 
 cocoon, spun on the stem of the plant or on the ground among grains 
 of sand. 
 
 At Highland, 111., August 11, I found on the red clover large num- 
 bers of both sexes of a tree-cricket (CEcanthus), and watched them 
 devour the clover-aphid at a great rate. Afterward we kept these 
 tree-crickets alive in the insectary for a long time and found it no 
 small trouble to keep them supplied with enough plant-lice. Big, as 
 compared with their victims, they soon cleaned a plant of aphids. One 
 male ate nineteen full-sized aphids at one meal, lasting fifty-five min- 
 utes, an aphid being finished in ten to ninety-five seconds, about one 
 louse per minute on an average. In this instance, it should be said, 
 Mr. Kelly facilitated matters by handing the cricket a new aphid as 
 soon as the old one was finished. The same cricket, on the following 
 day, being induced to repeat his performance, beat his previous record 
 
1909] 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 
 
 151 
 
 by devouring eleven aphids in eighteen minutes, but fell short of his 
 record for fifty-five minutes. 
 
 As an inveterate enemy of M. pisi, this (Ecanthus is undoubtedly 
 far ahead of Dr. Fletcher's Diplosis in capacity, but unfortunately does 
 not appear to be wide-spread, tho it is probably 
 common in southern Illinois. 
 
 This species of (Ecanthus agreed with none 
 of the published descriptions, but I found that 
 Mr. C. A. Hart and Mr. J. D. Hood had seen the 
 same species and given it the manuscript name of 
 confluens. 
 
 Triphleps insidiosus, an active little flower- 
 bug (Fig. 10) frequently impales M. pisi and 
 sucks its blood. In our breeding experiments 
 with the clover-louse this little intruder had to be 
 excluded, as it played mischief with the birth- 
 records. 
 
 Podisus (Fig. 11) and Euschistus (Fig. 12) as nymphs or adults 
 destroy a clover-louse once in a while, as I noticed. 
 
 FIG. 10. Triphleps insid- 
 iosus. Enlarged. (Af- 
 ter Riley.) 
 
 FIG. 11. Podisus maculiventris, nymph, 
 sucking the blood from a caterpillar. 
 Natural size. 
 
 FIG. 12. Euschistus variolarius. Four times 
 natural size. 
 
 The soldier-beetle (Podabrus rugulosus} was found feeding on M. 
 pisi in Maryland, by Johnson. 
 
 A small red mite (Rhyncholophus pcvrvus) was noted by Sander- 
 son as feeding on M. pisi in Delaware. 
 
 Let us now turn to the parasites of Macrosiphum pisi. 
 
 Aphidius. Often there is found on a clover leaf a dead aphid, 
 light brown in color, with the body distended, attached to the leaf in a 
 somewhat lifelike position by means of a little silken mat, which 
 
152 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 spreads out under the aphid and raises it above the surface of the leaf. 
 (PL II., Fig. 4.) This cocoon was made by a maggotlike larva that 
 had been feeding inside the body of the aphid. The winged braconid 
 emerges by cutting nearly a circle thru the skin of the host, usually 
 thru the abdomen, and leaves a circular opening with usually a cor- 
 responding lid. The mother Aphidius inserts a single egg into the 
 body of an aphid. 
 
 Two species of Aphidius are named in the literature as destroying 
 M. pisi: A. Hetcheri Ashm. MS., reported by Fletcher as having done 
 good service in Ottawa, Can., and bred from M. pisi in Delaware by 
 Sanderson; and A. washing tonensis Ashm., also bred by Sanderson 
 under the same circumstances. In Delaware, at least 5 percent of the 
 lice were killed by these parasites. 
 
 In Urbana, Aphidius is abundant every season on the clover-louse. 
 We have had the adults emerge June 21, 26; July 1, 3, 4, 6/8, 12, 17; 
 August 18, 24; and October 18, 19, mostly early in July, however. 
 
 An Aphidius larva that I found July 11 spun its oval silken carpet 
 under the aphid on the same day; July 12 the aphid had been raised 
 above the leaf and the cocoon was complete; July 18 the adult was 
 found, it having issued during the preceding twenty-four hours. An- 
 other black larva spun June 18 and the imago emerged June 26. From 
 a cocoon made October 12 the adult issued October 19. 
 
 October 10 a female Aphidius was put into a cage containing M. 
 pisi, the individuals of which had been reared under glass in a way to 
 insure their freedom from parasites. No oviposition was witnessed 
 (the mother dying October 21), but November 16 three of the aphids 
 showed the cocoons of Aphidius, the aphids having turned brown on 
 the day before. These aphids were kept over winter in glass vials, 
 and June 10 a winged Aphidius was found to have emerged. It was 
 dead then, but certainly did not issue before March 17, when the vials 
 were thoroly examined. 
 
 Another braconid, Trioxys (Praon) cerasaphis, was bred in large 
 numbers by Fletcher from material collected at Ottawa, Canada, the 
 material referred to being by implication M. pisi. 
 
 From what has been given it can be seen that a good many differ- 
 ent insects have to do with Matrosiphum pisi in one way or another, 
 and that the interrelations of some of them are involved. Thus, 
 Meqilla maculata, which eats M. pisi, is parasitized by Perilitus ameri- 
 canus, and preyed upon by Euschistus variolarius the eggs of which 
 are food for one of the proctotrypids. Syrphida destroy M. pisi and are 
 themselves food for the same Euschistus] furthermore, they are para- 
 sitized by Bassus latotorius, which, in turn, is parasitized by Pachyneu- 
 ron syrphi and Isocratus vulgaris. 
 
 Among the natural enemies of this aphid is to be counted the 
 English sparrow, according to a correspondent of Dr. J. B. Smith, who 
 wrote, "It was wonderful to watch them, how soon they cleared up a 
 pea-vine. After the sparrows commenced to work, they soon cleared 
 up every louse." 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 153 
 
 Control. The treatment of the pest is different according to 
 whether the insect feeds on peas or on clover. 
 
 Growers in the eastern United States and in Canada have found 
 that early peas are practically exempt from injury, and therefore plant 
 the early-maturing varieties when injury is probable. 
 
 On peas grown for commercial purposes, spraying is too expen- 
 sive, besides being in other respects impracticable, according to John- 
 son's elaborate experiments in Maryland. Sanderson found, in Dela- 
 ware, some little advantage in spraying while the lice are still confined 
 to the terminals and the vines are as yet upright. 
 
 A crop can be saved by the timely and thoro use of the "brush and 
 cultivator" method devised by Johnson. This method requires that the 
 peas be planted in rows 24 or 30 inches apart, instead of being sown 
 broadcast. The lice are brushed off the vines with switches of pine 
 branches or something similar, and are then buried under ground by 
 means of a cultivator drawn by a single horse. Cultivation should not 
 be repeated for three days, in order to insure the death of the buried 
 lice. On a hot day, Johnson found that lice left on the surface of the 
 ground died in a few minutes when the temperature of the air was 
 94-96 F., and that of the ground 115- 119 F. In one instance, 600 
 acres of peas were saved in this way; and tho forty men were neces- 
 sary for two weeks to brush and cultivate the peas, the crop netted the 
 owner 25,000 to 30,000 cases of peas of two dozen cans each. 
 
 Instead of a cultivator a large shallow pan can be used, and the 
 lice brushed into this as it is dragged between the rows by hand. In 
 such a contrivance, containing a little water and kerosene, Johnson 
 collected a bushel of lice to each row of J25 rods. The pan, made of 
 galvanized iron, may be five or six inches deep, and as wide as the 
 distance between the rows. Sanderson recommends this method as 
 being perhaps the best one. It can be used when the soil is too damp 
 for the cultivator. 
 
 Sanderson states that high fertilization (as with crimson clover 
 and lime), with frequent cultivation for several years, often enables a 
 crop of peas to mature in spite of the louse. 
 
 As the louse winters in the clover field and spreads from clover 
 to peas, these should be planted as far from clover as possible. If the 
 lice are abundant on clover in spring it may be advisable to plow the 
 clover under, and roll the ground, in order to save the peas (Sander- 
 son). 
 
 In gardens the louse can be controlled on green peas and flow- 
 ering sweet peas by spraying, as with whale-oil soap (1 pound to 5 
 gallons of water) or kerosene-soap emulsion, diluted with 12 parts of 
 water. Fletcher reports success with a spray of whale-oil soap and 
 tobacco decoction. He put 10 pounds of tobacco leaves into half a 
 barrel of water, strained off the liquid after a few hours, added 2 
 pounds of whale-oil soap, and, when this was dissolved, added enough 
 water to make 40 gallons. Two days after the application of this 
 spray to both surfaces of the leaves most of the lice were dead, and 
 
154 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 such parts of the rows as had received two applications were cleared 
 of the insects. 
 
 On red clover I have seen this aphid multiply in spring until its 
 numbers threatened the life of the plant, and then disappear, practi- 
 cally, thru natural agencies ; this for five successive seasons. A heavy 
 rain did the work assisted by the fungus Empusa aphidis and, second- 
 arily, by the numerous and important tho somewhat lagging pre- 
 daceous and parasitic insect foes of the aphid. _ Were it not for these 
 influences the louse would become a pest of the first magnitude in 
 spite of the vigor of the clover plant. Occasionally and locally it does 
 become such a pest, as already related. 
 
 Unfortunately, it can not be predicted whether the clover will be 
 killed or not, and if one is unwilling to take the chances, the safest 
 thing to do is to cut the clover just as soon as possible. Cutting and 
 drying the clover will kill most of the lice at any time during the sea.- 
 son. 
 
 The hordes of lice are for the most part the progeny of the fewer 
 lice of May, in the same field. So it follows that spring pasturing or 
 clipping back the clover would check the multiplication of the. louse. 
 
 The lice of April and May are the progeny of a comparatively 
 few wintered females that entered the field the preceding year, and 
 also of a few eggs laid the previous autumn in the first-year clover. 
 Therefore it is advisable to cut or pasture the clover in the latter part 
 of its first season and this will not hurt the plant if done intelligently. 
 
 Macrosiphum pisi Kalt. 
 
 1899. Johnson, W. G. Bull. No. 20, N. S., U. S. Dept. Agr., 
 
 Div. Ent, pp. 94-99. 
 
 1900. Johnson, W. G. Can. Ent., Vol. XXXII., pp. 56-60. 
 Chittenden, F. H. Bull. No. 23, N. S., U. S. Dept. Agr., 
 
 Div. Ent., pp. 33-37. 
 Johnson, W. G. Bull. No. 26, N. S., U. S. Dept. Agr., 
 
 Div. Ent., pp. 55-59. 
 Sanderson, E. D. Bull. No. 26, N. S., U. S. Dept. Agr., 
 
 Div. Ent., pp. 69-72. 
 Sanderson, E. D. Bull. No. 49, Del. Agr. Exper. Sta., pp. 
 
 14-24. 
 Fletcher, James. Rep. Exper. Farms Canada, 1899, pp. 
 
 170-174. 
 
 1901. Sanderson, E. D. Can. Ent., Vol. XXXIII., pp. 31-39. 
 Sanderson, E. D. Twelfth Rep. Del. Agr. Exper. Sta., 
 
 1900, pp. 169-186. 
 
 Fletcher, James. Rep. Exper. Farms Canada, 1900, pp. 
 
 211-213. 
 Chittenden, F. H. Circ. No. 43, U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. 
 
 Ent., pp. 1-8. 
 
 1902. Sanderson, E. D. Thirteenth Rep. Del. Agr. Exper. Sta.. 
 
 1901, pp. 168-172. 
 
1909] THE INSECT PKSTS OF CLOVKR AND ALFALFA 155 
 
 CLOVER LEAF-WEEVIL 
 Phytonomus punctatus Fab. 
 
 Tho this insect must be counted among the most important clover 
 pests, it has not as yet established itself as an annual menace to the 
 hay crop. Indeed, it is ordinarily held in check by a great variety of 
 adverse influences, and seldom gets control of the plant reminding 
 one, in this respect, of the army-worm. 
 
 In early spring the larvae make small round holes in the leaves of 
 second-year clover, as soon as the leaves have begun to grow ; later, 
 they eat inward from the margin, the injury increasing in April and 
 May. Thruout the summer the beetles gnaw the clover leaves in a 
 ragged fashion and may even eat the plant down to the roots. 
 
 The larvae and beetles are not seen in the daytime, unless one 
 hunts for them ; they are nocturnal in their activity. The larvae, curled 
 up under rubbish on the ground, are green with a white stripe along 
 the middle of the back ; they have no legs and are sluglike when in- 
 active. The adults tough, oval, brown beetles are also found on 
 the ground during the day, motionless, with the legs and antennae 
 drawn up against the body, or else moving away sluggishly when ex- 
 posed to the light. 
 
 Distribution. Tho this species has been familiar to European en- 
 tomologists for more than a century, occurring as it does thruout 
 Europe and in western Siberia, it was not recognized in this country 
 until 1881, when its ruinous work was reported from Yates county, 
 New York. At present the species is known to occur in Vermont, 
 Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, 
 Delaware, Maryland, District of Columbia, West Virginia, North Car- 
 olina, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin, and also in 
 Ontario, Canada. From the data collected by F. M. Webster, the in- 
 sect appears to have spread from New York into Ohio, then westward ; 
 also from New York into Canada. At Ridgeway, Ont., Mr. A. H. 
 Kilman found that the beetles were being brought by the east wind, 
 August 10, 1884. On the same day, at Buffalo, N. Y., ten miles due 
 east of Ridgeway and across the lake, the beetles swarmed on the 
 pavements and could be collected by the quart along the lake shore. 
 Reinecke noted their abundance in Buffalo following a heavy east 
 wind. 
 
 Food Plants and Injuries. The food plants in Europe are given as 
 Tri folium (clover) and Medicago sativa (lucerne, alfalfa). In the 
 United States the insect eats all kinds of clovers, and alfalfa as well. 
 The other food plants that have been named, are beans and timothy for 
 the larva, and burdock and the flowers of goldenrod for the beetle. 
 
 Webster observed a preference for white clover over red. In 
 central Illinois red clover is most -heavily infested, alfalfa coming sec- 
 ond, and white clover third. Mammoth clover and alsike are freely 
 eaten if they happen to be available. 
 
 European accounts refer but scantily to this species as a pest, 
 aside from references to its devastations in Italy in the years 1867-70; 
 
156 
 
 BULLETIN No. 134 
 
 [April, 
 
 and in this country the insect, tho often abundant, seldom accomplishes 
 the injury anticipated because the larvae are usually killed in spring by 
 a fungous disease. When this species cooperates with the root-borer, 
 in a time of drought, injury of the worst kind may ensue. 
 
 The larvae eat the leaves, and the beetles eat the leaves and stems 
 also, as described later. 
 
 Description. The egg is easily visible as a yellow object (chrome- 
 yellow at first), elongate oval, 1.1 mm. long and 0.6 mm. broad. It 
 darkens in from two to six days after being laid, and the surface is 
 then rough, and sculptured with hexagonal depressions. 
 
 In the clover field the larvae of this species (Fig. 13) can not easily 
 be mistaken for anything else. They are green usually, and lie on the 
 ground curled head to tail. Close examination shows that they are 
 
 footless and have a brown head, while along 
 the middle of the back is a white or pale 
 yellow stripe edged with rose-red or black- 
 
 FIG. 14. Clover leaf-weevil, Phytono- 
 mus punctatus, cocoon. Greatly en- 
 larged. 
 
 ish red. The youngest larvae, to be sure, 
 FIG. 13. Clover leaf-weevil, differ f rom this description, for when only 
 
 Phytonomus punctatus, lar- i c -7 Inno- fli^v HT-A virhirp r>r 
 
 va. Greatly enlarged. 1 ' 3 mm - or Z mm - lon g> tne y are WHltC < 
 
 pale yellow, with a jet-black head and only 
 
 a suggestion of the characteristic median dorsal stripe ; they are curled 
 up on the ground and sluggish, however, just like the older larvae. 
 
 Riley (1882, p. 178) gave a detailed description of the larva in its 
 four stages. The body tapers gradually toward each end. The color, 
 white at hatching, becomes green as soon as a meal has been taken. 
 Some larvae, however, are distinctly yellow instead of green, and a 
 few are bluish green. The head, black in the first stage, becomes 
 afterward brown or yellowish brown. The second stage (after the 
 first moult) is marked by the appearance of the broad white dorsal 
 line, bordered on each side by a blackish streak, and the length of the 
 larva is 4 mm. After the second moult this line is more conspicuous 
 and the length of the larva is 5 to 7 mm. With the third and final 
 moult, the larvae become decidedly green, tho the posterior part of the 
 
1909] 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 
 
 157 
 
 body remains yellowish; the dorsal line becomes tinged with rose 
 color and edged with blackish rose; length 8 to 14 mm. The cocoon 
 is oval (Fig. 14), 9-10 mm. long and 6.5-7 mm. broad, and is com- 
 posed of a coarse network of brownish threads. 
 
 The newly formed pupa (Fig. 15) has a yellowish green head, 
 small black eyes, and yellow antennae, legs, and wing-pads. The abdo- 
 men is dark green with a pale dorsal line, and bears numerous hairs at 
 its extremity and a transverse series of dorsal setae on each of its seg- 
 ments. 
 
 The beetle (Fig. 16) is a stout, oval, brown, finely punctured cur- 
 culio. The female is about 8 mm. in length and 4.5 mm. in greatest 
 width, some specimens being as long as 8.5 mm. The prevailing color 
 
 FIG. 15. 
 
 FIG. 16. 
 
 Clover Leaf-weevil, Phytonomus pwnctatus: Fig. 15, pupa; Fig. 16, beetle. 
 Greatly enlarged. 
 
 above is brown, but the sides of the prothorax and elytra are washed 
 with pale yellowish brown, which on the elytra covers the outer five 
 interspaces. Occasionally there is a pale sutural line. The elytra are 
 marked above with small black spots, due to scales which occur at regu- 
 lar intervals on the interspaces. The prothorax is much narrower than 
 the abdomen, subquadrate, and one fifth broader than long, with the 
 sides rounding anteriorly and converging slightly posteriorly. The 
 pronotum has three pale longitudinal lines, one in the middle and one 
 on each side. The eyes are transverse. The beak is half as long 
 again as the head, stout and curved, with deep antennal grooves. The 
 scales and the short sparse setae of the body are either brown or yel- 
 iow. 
 
 The male, 7 mm. in maximum length, differs from the female in 
 being smaller and narrower, with the sides of the elytra less rounded; 
 
158 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 it is also darker in color than the female, with a narrower pale area on 
 each elytron, the two outermost interspaces being dark instead of pale. 
 The pygidium (which is not exposed) is, as usual in the family Cur- 
 culionidce, divided by a transverse suture so as to form an additional, 
 or anal, segment; thus the male has eight "dorsal segments" and the 
 female seven. 
 
 P. punctatus is distinguishable at once from our other species of 
 Phytonomus by its coloration, large size, and stout beak. As to smaller 
 differences, punctatus is characterized by having mandibles that are not 
 emarginate at the tip, while the first and second segments of the funicle 
 are equal ; in the other species of the genus the first segment is stouter 
 and often longer than the second, and the beak is longer and more 
 slender than in punctatus. In the clover field, this beetle will be recog- 
 nized without difficulty. 
 
 Life History. In central Illinois we have only one annual gener- 
 ation of this insect, as seems to be the rule elsewhere. All thru the 
 winter small larvae can be found in the clover field under rubbrsh on 
 the ground or between the bases of the clover stems. In early spring 
 the few warm days that start the clover on its new growth revive the 
 larvae also, and they begin to mar the fresh clover leaves with little 
 round holes eaten out of the blades of the leaflets. In the early season 
 of 1907 the first new leaves of red clover began to show March 19, and 
 were already riddled by these larvae March 23, at which date the larvae 
 were common on the ground near the affected plants. In early spring 
 the larvae are of many sizes, with an average of 5 mm. in length, tho 
 many are only 2 or 2.5 mm. long, and a few are as long as 7 mm. I 
 have rarely found the beetles in early spring, and such as were found 
 were either dead or in the last stages of decrepitude, and evidently in- 
 capable of doing anything toward the propagation of their kind. 
 
 I have not found more than four larval stages the number given 
 by Riley. The first stage lasts about nine days, in the insectary ; thus 
 larvae born November 16 moulted for the first time November 25. 
 Some of the larvae, born in late autumn, do not moult until the following 
 March or April. For example, one larva was in its first stage April 
 1 ; it moulted April 8, April 17, and May 4, and spun May 20. The in- 
 tervals between moults are, however, very variable, especially when the 
 weather is unsettled, and the growth of the larvae is consequently in- 
 termittent. 
 
 The pupal period indoors we have found to be 10 to 20 days, as 
 in four instances following: 
 
 ( 1 ) Spinning occurred April 22 ; pupation, April 24 ; emergence, May 1 1 . 
 
 (2) Spinning occurred April 22 ; pupation, April 24 ; emergence, May 14. 
 
 (3) Spinning occurred April 24 ; pupation, April 30 ; emergence,May 20. 
 
 (4) Spinning occurred May 20 ; pupation, May 27 ; emergence, June 6. 
 
 Larvae of various sizes are common in April and May, but nearly 
 all attain their growth before June 20. Rarely, beetles of the new gen- 
 eration appear as early as May 9; on that date we once found two 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 159 
 
 freshly emerged beetles in the field. The latest date for their emer- 
 gence may be given as July 15. Many beetles issue daily from June 
 5 to June 30, and most of the beetles issue during the last week of 
 June. 
 
 Early as the beetles appear, they do not begin to mate until the last 
 week of August, and nearly air the eggs are laid in September and 
 October. 
 
 We have insectary records of oviposition for almost every day be- 
 tween September 17 and October 26, and almost daily records of 
 hatching from October 9 to November 27. The egg period in autumn 
 is from 23 to 45 days, averaging 29 days ; the length of the period de- 
 pends upon temperature chiefly; some of the latest eggs, indeed, 
 do not hatch until the following spring. Out-of-doors we have found 
 eggs as late as November 14, and young larvae as early as October 10. 
 After that date they soon become common, and can be found at any 
 time during the winter between the bases of the clover stems, as deep 
 as possible, or else on the ground under more or less protection. Many 
 of them succumb to the cold, however. These winter larvae also are 
 of various sizes. Sixty-five larvae measured November 26 ranged in 
 length from 2.5 mm. to 7.5 mm., with an average of 3.17 mm. 
 
 Late in October a few living beetles more than three months old 
 occur in the clover field and go into hibernation. Early in the fol- 
 lowing spring their dead bodies may be found. Farther south, it is 
 possible that enough beetles survive the winter to influence the course 
 of the life history. 
 
 The preceding general account of the life history is based upon 
 such a large body of observations that it represents the actual condi- 
 tions with considerable accuracy, for central Illinois. A few precise 
 notes are added on account of their significance. 
 
 Many eggs laid between October 16 and 25, 1905, were apparently 
 sound January 21, 1906, and had not hatched February 23; but 
 March 21, young larvae from them were found, still alive, and 2 mm. in 
 length. Again, eggs laid October 26, 1904, did not hatch until April 
 13, 1905. 
 
 I have several times followed the consecutive life history for a 
 year or more. The longest account, covering a period of eighteen 
 months, begins with a female beetle taken September 23, 1904. She 
 laid eggs as follows: 
 
 Sept. 26, one mass of eggs. 
 
 Oct. 1, three egg-masses; hatched Nov. 3 and 4; larvae alive Nov. 
 21, but died during winter. 
 
 Oct. 9, several eggs laid ; they hatched November 19 ; the larvae 
 died in winter. 
 
 Oct. 26, several eggs laid ; unhatched April 12, 1905 ; hatched 
 April 13. 
 
 Nov. 1, three eggs; hatched Nov. 27, in warm room. The mother 
 was alive Nov. 21, but died during the winter. 
 
 The larvae that were born April 13, 1905, were reared; they buried 
 
160 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 themselves in the ground May 23 and 24 and gave beetles June 13. 
 Four of these beetles were kept alive until August 28, and August 29 
 one male and one female remained. The female laid eggs Oct. 16, 17, 
 21, 24, and 25. These eggs had not hatched February 23, 1906, but 
 had just hatched March 21 ; by March 29 the larvae had died, however, 
 from a scarcely excusable neglect to supply them with food. The' 
 parent beetles had died the year before, about November 11. 
 
 This account of the life history is in some respects at variance 
 with that of Riley (1882, pp. 175, 176). In central Illinois the egg 
 period in autumn is from 23 to 45 days in the breeding-cage. Fur- 
 thermore, none of the larvae born in autumn give beetles in that season ; 
 the beetles do not emerge until the following June or thereabouts, and 
 some of these are the beetles that will enter upon hibernation. In my 
 experience, no eggs are laid in spring. In a warmer latitude than this 
 there might very well be a second generation of beetles, to hibernate 
 and to lay eggs the following spring. Indeed, in this latitude, the little 
 autumn larvae, if taken indoors and fed, will produce beetles in mid- 
 winter. 
 
 Here, then, the clover leaf-weevil winters chiefly as a small larva ; 
 occasionally in the egg; never as a pupa, in my experience; and rarely 
 as a beetle. No eggs are laid in spring, however, and there is clearly 
 but one generation a year, tho this generation is straggling instead of 
 compact. 
 
 Habits. The larvae that have hibernated are ready to eat the red 
 clover as soon as it starts on its second year's growth. At any time 
 during the winter one can get plenty of these larvae by digging up 
 clover sod and starting the growth of the clover indoors. 
 
 In midwinter, on a mild day (Jan. 6, 1903), the larvae were feeding 
 in abundance on red clover plants in Urbana, 111. (R. D. Glasgow) 
 and in broad daylight. This is unusual, for at other times of the year 
 they feed only at night or else -at dusk or in daytime when the sky is 
 sufficiently cloudy. Ordinarily, when the sun is shining they are found 
 curled up in shaded situations, usually on the ground, but occasionally 
 .among the stems of their food plant. When feeding at night the larger 
 larvae drop to the ground when approached, but the smaller ones re- 
 main clinging to the leaflets, just as Riley observed. The larva fre- 
 quently curls itself around the edge of a leaflet and bites out a small 
 round piece from the blade ; or it may secure a hold by gripping a hair 
 of the leaf between two of its body segments. Only the youngest larvae 
 make the little round holes in the leaflets ; the older larvae eat gaps in 
 the edges. 
 
 The feeding of the larvae in spring is more or less intermittent, 
 being suspended at every cold spell. In 1907, when the entire month 
 of April was cold in central Illinois and frequent freezes blackened 
 more than one third of the red clover leaves, the larvae of the leaf- 
 weevil, like their food plant, made no growth during the month of 
 April, but became dormant again until May, tho they had been active 
 during the warm weather of late March. Retarded in their develop- 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 161 
 
 ment by one month, they made up in May for what they had lost, and 
 the majority of the beetles appeared at the usual time in June. 
 
 The locomotion of the larva is peculiar. The larva secures a hold 
 on a hair by means of its mouth ; then brings forward the end of the 
 abdomen to secure a new hold, and stretches forward the rest of the 
 body. Tho the larva is termed footless, it has, nevertheless, paired 
 ventral fleshy tubercles which, from their anatomical relations, are evi- 
 dently equivalent to the legs of other larvae ; also a median ventral pro- 
 thoracic tubercle. These muscular tubercles assist in locomotion, 
 especially on smooth surfaces. As the larva walks on the under side 
 of a sheet of glass, slightly moistened, a suckerlike action of these 
 tubercles is evident. 
 
 The color of the larva is white at birth, but a green tinge appears 
 as soon as the larva has taken its first meal of green plant tissue. 
 Some larvae are yellow instead of green ; diseased larvae are generally 
 yellow, tho not all yellow larvae are diseased. Now and then a larva is 
 found having a decided blue tinge. 
 
 When full grown the larva buries itself just under the surface of 
 the soil and makes an oval cell, against the smooth wall of which it 
 spins the cocoon; once in a while the cocoon is constructed among the 
 bases of green clover stems. The cocoon, oval in form, consists of a 
 coarse network of threads with round or oval meshes ; it is pale yellow 
 at first, becoming brownish with age. The actual spinning is done 
 with the mouth. The first threads are laid in haphazard fashion across 
 one another; but after a coarse framework has been made, the larva 
 lays the later threads along beside the earlier ones, forming a stout 
 network, and gradually reducing the meshes to small rounded holes. 
 At intervals the supply of silk fluid in the mouth gives out; then the 
 larva reaches back to the end of the abdomen and by an assiduous 
 process of nibbling secures a new supply of the silk fluid from the rec- 
 tum, and resumes its spinning. This performance always occurs, and 
 can be observed easily with a hand lens in the earlier stages of cocoon- 
 spinning. Riley and J. A. Osborne were each partly correct in their 
 accounts of the spinning (Riley, 1882, p. 175). 
 
 The beetle eats its way out of the cocoon and enters upon a long 
 and lazy existence of feeding by night and resting by day. Not until 
 the last of August do the beetles arouse to reproductive activity. In 
 summer they -are sluggish in the daytime, under debris on the ground, 
 but at night'they are contrastingly alert. They reduce clover leaves to 
 rags, beginning at the margins and eating inward, usually leaving the 
 stout bases of the veins, but sometimes devouring the entire plant down 
 to the ground stalks, flower heads, and all. Incidentally, they spot 
 the plants with a brown fluid. Like the larvae, they are quick to drop 
 when approached. 
 
 We have many times kept these beetles alive all summer, waiting 
 for them to lay eggs. When the time comes they lay the conspicuous 
 yellow eggs in profusion in the breeding-cages, with or without method, 
 as the case may be. The female may scatter her eggs about promis- 
 
162 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 cuously or place them in small bunches on the plant or elsewhere. In 
 other instances she bites a hole in a clover stem and inserts an egg 
 lengthwise, pushing it far in or leaving it sticking out of the stem. 
 Sometimes she makes a cavity without laying an egg in it. Often the 
 female eats her eggs. In a breeding-cage that is sufficiently shaded, 
 eggs may be laid during the day ; normally they are laid at night. Mr. 
 R. L. Webster observed oviposition in our insectary October 16, begin- 
 ning at 6 :30 p. m. He found a female clinging to a clover stem, with 
 her head downward, and piercing the stem with her rostrum, thrusting 
 it in almost to the antennae. At times she would raise the body on the 
 front pair of legs as if throwing her entire weight on the beak. Having 
 made a sufficiently large hole, she reversed her position and inserted a 
 single egg; the actual oviposition took not more than twenty seconds. 
 Then she made another hole but did not attempt to lay an egg in it. 
 
 Out-of-doors the eggs are found inserted into clover stems, but 
 occur also, to some extent, on the base of the plant, where the stems 
 join; rarely they are found on the ground. 
 
 The male often accompanies the female on her round of oviposi- 
 tion and there are repetitions of the process of fertilization, alternating 
 with the periods of oviposition. September 25, a pair of beetles were 
 put on potted red clover ; Sept. 27, twelve eggs were laid ; Sept. 28, 
 six; Sept. 29, several; Oct. 5, several; Oct. 8, several more; Oct. 17, 
 copulation occurred, probably, for the second time ; Oct. 23, more eggs 
 were laid ; Oct. 31, the female was missing. 
 
 The largest number of eggs that we have obtained from one 
 female is forty. 
 
 Usually the female takes three or four weeks to lay all her eggs, 
 under insectary conditions. In the field the period of egg-laying ap- 
 pears to be shortened, in the last of the season, by frost. 
 
 Our observations on the habits of this species are in accord with 
 those of Riley, except as regards some minor details of locomotion and 
 silk-spinning. 
 
 Natural Enemies. Riley notes the larva of a small beetle, Col- 
 lops quadrimaculatus, as feeding upon the eggs of the clover leaf- 
 weevil, and Cicindela repanda as probably preying upon the larva of 
 the weevil. In Europe various ichneumons parasitize Phytonomus 
 larvae, but in this country no such parasites have come to light as yet. 
 
 Webster mentions the fact that the larvae are destroyed by birds, 
 and that barnyard fowls, especially turkeys, are very fond of them. 
 
 The worst enemy of the leaf-weevil is an epidemic disease, that 
 under favorable conditions sweeps off the larvae by the wholesale. 
 This disease, due to a fungus, needs damp and not too cold weather 
 for its development, and affects the larvae in April or May and again 
 in October and November, but not during winter. The contagion is 
 rapid and thoro; no matter how abundant the larvae are, the infection 
 spreads until, after two to four weeks, it is almost impossible to find a 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 163 
 
 living specimen. "The sick larvae of all ages crawl up the herbage 
 during the night, and instead of again concealing themselves near the 
 ground on the approach of light, as the healthy ones' do, ascend as high 
 as possible, and if on grass, coil themselves in a horizontal position 
 about the apex of the blade, or if on other objects, take a position as 
 nearly similar as the shape of the object permits. If disturbed before 
 the middle of the forenoon, the majority are still able to crawl, although 
 sluggishly; by noon most of them are quite dead, but unchanged in 
 appearance. It will be found that they cling to the leaf with greater 
 
 tenacity than during life Late in the afternoon, the body has 
 
 changed from the normal yellowish or pea-green and smooth appear- 
 ance to a velvety gray. The next morning there is only a small, black- 
 ened and shriveled mass remaining, while the surrounding foliage is 
 powdered with a whitish, clinging dust, composed of the spores of the 
 fungus. If some of the dead insects had been placed on a pane of 
 glass, and a tumbler inverted over them during the night, they would 
 have shrunken less, and been covered with a white fleecy growth, while 
 on the glass, surrounding each body, would have been a white halo of 
 spores two-thirds of an inch in diameter, such as everyone has ob- 
 served about dead flies on the window in autumn. This is the general 
 course of this rapid and fatal disease." (J. C. Arthur.) 
 
 This fungus, known as Empusa (Entomophthora) sphcerosperma 
 Fres., is found in the body of the larva as a network of colorless 
 branching threads (mycelium) which absorb the fluids of the body; 
 some of the branches push thru the ventral wall of the body and attach 
 themselves to the nearest surface as holdfasts (rhizoids) ; other 
 branches pierce the skin and form a gray velvety coating on the body 
 of the larva, and the tips of some of these branches each form a spore 
 (conidium), which is .finally projected forcibly into the air, to infect 
 any other larva 'that it may happen to hit. These temporary spores 
 germinate at once, pushing out one or more threads, which enter the 
 host and grow, forming a mycelium. There are also resting spores ; 
 these develop within the body of the host and are capable of surviving 
 for a longer period than the temporary spores. 
 
 Other and more technical details in regard to the fungus are given 
 by J. C. Arthur (Fourth Rep. N. Y. Agr. Exper. Sta., 1885 [1886], pp. 
 258-262) and by Thaxter (Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. IV., 
 1888, pp. 172-175). 
 
 This fungus is by no means dependent upon the clover leaf-weevil 
 for its existence, for it has a long list of hosts, representing most of the 
 larger orders of insects. The list includes the common cabbage-worm, 
 mosquitoes and some other flies, ichneumons, certain leaf-hoppers, etc. 
 Fortunately, also, the fungus is widely distributed in America as well 
 as in Europe. In this country the ravages of the fungus on the leaf- 
 weevil have been reported from nearly every region in which the 
 weevil has been injurious. 
 
164 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 Control. The reported outbreaks of the larvae in spring have al- 
 most always been suppressed by the virulent disease just described. 
 This disease prevents the summer damage by the beetles, often killing 
 the larvae before they have done much injury. 
 
 Riley's recommendation to plow badly infested clover under in 
 May rather than to allow it to become a source of contagion, has sel- 
 dom been followed unless the clover root-borer also has been present, 
 for the leaf-weevil by itself has not often done an immense amount of 
 damage. 
 
 The fact that the young larvae hibernate, led Riley to mention the 
 possibility of crushing them or burning them, but he added his doubt 
 as to the practicability of killing them by rolling or by burning the 
 clover stubble in winter. 
 
 The necessity for the employment of any remedy does not appear 
 until the clover is well on in its second year's growth. If damage is an- 
 ticipated, however, it would seem advisable to pasture the clover lightly 
 or to clip it back in spring ; this does not hurt the clover, is highly de- 
 sirable as a means of forestalling the attacks of some other clover 
 pests, and might check the larvae of the leaf-weevil somewhat, tho it 
 is possible that they would subsist on the cut stems until the new 
 growth started; and in cold weather they can live a long time without 
 any food. 
 
 After the second season red clover should be plowed under to get 
 rid of this and other pests, as well as for agricultural reasons. 
 
 Phytonomus punctatus Fab. 
 
 1882. Riley, C. V. Rep. [U. S.] Comm. Agr., 1881-82, pp. 171- 
 
 179. 
 
 Lintner, J. A. First Rep. Ins. N. Y., pp. 247-253. 
 1884. Kilman, A. H. Can. Ent., Vol. XVI., pp. 144, 145. 
 1896. Webster, F. M. Bull. No. 68, Ohio Agr. Exper. Sta., pp. 
 27-31. 
 
 CLOVER ROOT-BORER 
 
 Hylastinus obscurus Marsh. 
 
 (Hylastes obscurus, H. trifolii Mull., Hylesinus trifolii Mull.) 
 
 This pernicious root-borer is gradually spreading over the United 
 Slates and Canada, and has already ruined crops of clover in New 
 York, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan. Often the injury done by this 
 insidious insect has been attributed to drought or disease. The in- 
 jury appears in the wilting and death of the plant. A badly injured 
 plant breaks off easily, at the crown ; the roots are burrowed out length- 
 wise, and in the burrows can be found white footless grubs, or little, 
 dark brown, cylindrical beetles, as tough in body as the others of their 
 family, Scolytidce. 
 
1909] 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 
 
 165 
 
 Distribution. This beetle was introduced from Europe, where it 
 has been known for more than a century, feeding chiefly on red clover 
 "but also on alsike. In this country it first attract- 
 ed attention as a pest in 1878 in central New 
 York. Thence it spread westward in the region 
 of Lake Erie, doing great damage in Ontario, 
 Can., in 1888, appearing in Michigan in 1889 at 
 the west end of Lake Erie, and after that spread- 
 ing over southern Michigan with disastrous con- 
 sequences. In Ohio it was injurious by 1890, 
 and seriously so in the northwestern part of the 
 state in 1893. It has reached Indiana, Illinois, 
 Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and North Caro- 
 lina, and has even been reported from Oregon. 
 
 .Food Plants and Injury. In America the 
 chief food plants are red clover and mammoth 
 clover; others being alsike, alfalfa, and the pea. 
 
 First-year clover, its roots being small in 
 spring, when the beetle lays its eggs, is not known 
 to be attacked by this borer; second-year clover 
 is attacked; and clover that has been allowed to 
 run for more than two years harbors the pest in 
 abundance. 
 
 An affected plant finally wilts and dies; 
 when pulled by hand or by the mower it breaks 
 off at the surface of the ground. The roots of 
 such a plant are burrowed out longitudinally 
 (Fig. 17), the burrows, with their walls more or 
 less decayed, contain the excrementitious parti- 
 cles of the insect, and usually the insect itself in 
 one or more of its stages, tho the beetles, being 
 small, sluggish, and inconspicuous in color, are 
 easily overlooked. Small cylindrical holes thru 
 the sides of the roots are characteristic of this 
 species, as indicating the emergence of beetles. 
 
 The amount and rapidity of injury depend 
 not only upon the number of insects present but 
 also upon the amount of moisture received by the plant. In dry 
 weather the plant succumbs quickly to the borer, but in wet weather 
 the plant, tho weakened, may continue to survive. Injured plants are 
 liable to die late in June or early in July, after cutting ; tho with plenty 
 of rain many of the crippled plants may live until winter. In 1893 
 and 1894 the root-borer, in combination with the leaf-weevil and dry 
 weather, caused a general failure of the clover crop in Michigan. 
 
 The borer is said to be responsible for an irregular, imperfect 
 blooming of the clover or a failure to bloom at all. If the plants sur- 
 vive, thanks to copious rains, the yield of seed is liable to be almost 
 nothing. In central Illinois the root-borer is generally distributed, but 
 
 FIG. 17. Clover Root- 
 borer, Hylastinus ob- 
 scurus; work of insect. 
 (Webster, Circ. 67, Bur. 
 Ent., U. S. Dept. of Ag- 
 riculture.) 
 
166 
 
 BULLETIN No. 134 
 
 [April, 
 
 is not a pest as yet, tho Mr. J. A. West, assistant to the State Ento- 
 mologist, found alsike injured by it at Monticello in 1907. 
 
 FIG. 18. 
 
 FIG. 19. 
 
 FIG. 20. 
 
 Clover Root-borer, Hylastinus obscurus: Fig. 18, beetle; Fig. 19, larva; Fig. 20, pupa. 
 Greatly enlarged. (Webster, Circ. 67, Bur. Ent., U. S. Dept. of Agriculture.) 
 
 Stages. The beetle (Fig. 18) is small at most only 2.5 mm. in 
 length dark brown or blackish, cylindrical, hard-bodied and hairy. 
 The elytra, or wing-covers, often have a reddish tinge, and are coarsely 
 punctate ; and the head and pronotum are more finely punctate, the lat- 
 ter bearing sparse long hairs. The tibiae have large teeth near the outer 
 end. 
 
 The egg is minute, tho visible to the naked eye, white, and elliptical, 
 with a smooth, shining surface. 
 
 The larva (Fig. 19) is stout, white, with yellow head and brown 
 mouth parts, footless, and 3 mm. long when full grown. 
 
 The pupa (Fig. 20) is white, with a pair of spinelike projections 
 at the extremity of the abdomen, and another pair on the top of the 
 head. The pronotum shows a feeble median ridge and bears a few 
 scattering bristles. 
 
 Life History and Habits. There is but one generation a year. In 
 Ohio, where Webster worked out the life history, the insect winters in 
 clover roots as a beetle and also, tho less commonly, as a larva, the 
 latter pupating in spring. The beetles leave the roots during May and 
 fly about. The eggs are laid mostly from May 15 to June 20 in cavi- 
 ties eaten out by the females in the crown of the plant or down on the 
 sides of the roots. In each cavity the female lays several eggs. Mr. 
 G. C. Davis found females laying eggs inside the root, in the burrows, 
 the eggs being packed into the dead wall of the burrow and covered, 
 with refuse. The larvae, the first of which hatch late in May, feed for 
 a time where they hatched, then tunnel along the roots/making one or 
 more longitudinal galleries with occasional side branches, and filling 
 the burrows with excrement. The pupa is found at the end of a bur- 
 row. Most of the larvae pupate before the first of August and most of 
 the pupae transform to beetles before the first of October. The beetles 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 167 
 
 remain in the roots, 'however, until the following spring, feeding mean- 
 while, when they are not dormant. 
 
 In Ohio, according to Webster, larvae and adults can be found at 
 almost any time of the year, tho the beetles are rare in July. Pupae 
 are most common in July, but occur in August and even up to the mid- 
 dle of November, and a few pupae, newly formed, are met with in early 
 spring. Eggs have been found as late, or as early, as September 18 in 
 Michigan. 
 
 Most of our articles on this insect have simply been based on the 
 excellent accounts that Riley, Webster, and G. C. Davis published, and 
 the species needs more study than it has received. 
 
 Here in central Illinois the life history and habits are as Webster 
 found them to be in Ohio. 
 
 September 9 a pair of the beetles were observed in coitu in one 
 of our cages. The conditions were not quite natural, however, for I 
 had taken the beetles from roots and put them on potted clover; out- 
 of-doors they probably would not have left the roots until spring. As 
 soon as they were placed on the plant, September 8, they began to 
 burrow into the crown; they mated the day after; October 3, a long 
 burrow was found, containing several larvae at its lower end, but no 
 eggs; one of the parent beetles was still alive on November 21. 
 
 Only one natural enemy of the clover root-borer has been put on 
 record a telephorid larva, probably Telephones bilineatus Say, men- 
 tioned by Riley as preying on the larva of the borer. 
 
 Control. A badly infested field should be plowed as soon as pos- 
 sible after the removal of the hay crop, in order to starve the grubs by 
 drying out the roots. The plowing must not be delayed, for early in 
 July (latitude of Ohio, Webster) the larvae begin to pass into the qui- 
 escent, or pupa, stage, in which they take no food; then they would 
 doubtless transform and emerge as beetles in some numbers in spite 
 of plowing. 
 
 In Ontario, Can., the value of clover as a green fertilizer is so 
 generally appreciated that the farmers do not hesitate to plow the 
 clover under at the first signs of the presence of the root-borer. 
 (Fletcher.) 
 
 Another thing: Red clover should not be permitted to straggle 
 along after the second year to furnish a nursery for this pest and 
 others. 
 
 Fertilizers do not kill the root-borer and will not save the plant 
 so Mr. G. C. Davis concluded from his experiments with nitrate of 
 soda, muriate of potash, and kainit. Generally speaking, fertilizers as 
 used against a root-feeding insect act more by stimulating the plant 
 than by affecting the insect directly. 
 
 Hylastinus obscurus Marsh. 
 
 1879. Riley, C. V. Rep. [U. S.] Comm. Agr., 1878, pp. 248-250. 
 
 1880. Lintner, J. A. Thirty-ninth Rep. N. Y. State Agr. Soc., 
 
 1879, pp. 41, 42. 
 
168 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 1894. Davis, G. C Bull. No. 116, Mich. Agr. Exper. Sta., pp. 
 
 41-47. 
 1896. Webster, F. M. Bull. No. 68, Ohio Agr. Exper. Sta., pp. 
 
 31-33. 
 1899. Webster, F. M. Bull. No. 112, Ohio Agr. Exper. Sta., pp. 
 
 143-149. 
 1905. Webster, F. M. Circ. No. 67, U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Ent, 
 
 pp. 1-5. 
 
 CLOVER HAY-WORM 
 
 Hypsopygia costalis Fab. 
 
 (Pyralis costalis, Asopia costalis} 
 
 The clover hay-worm works in stacked or stored clover, eating 
 much of it, and contaminating much more with webs of silk and parti- 
 cles of excrement, making the hay unfit for fodder. 
 
 This species, described as long ago as 1775, has been sufficiently 
 infrequent in England to be valued by the collector. It inhabits cen- 
 tral and southern Europe, northern Asia, northern Africa, and a large 
 part of North America. In this country its destructive work has been 
 seen in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, 
 Maryland, West Virginia, North Carolina, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Ken- 
 tucky, Tennessee, Alabama, Kansas, Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska, Michi- 
 gan, and in Ontario, Canada. 
 
 In Illinois the species is widely distributed, according to the 
 records of the State Entomologist, and has done no little damage in 
 various parts of the state. 
 
 Injury. The larvae attack the bottom of a clover stack to a height 
 of two feet or more from the ground ; similarly, in the barn, they 
 occur near the floor. They interweave the hay with white silken webs, 
 intermixed with black pellets of excrement resembling coarse grains of 
 gunpowder; they reduce much of the hay to chaff, and their webs 
 give the hay the appearance of being mouldy ; in fact, such hay actu- 
 ally becomes mouldy if it has been lying near the ground. This hay is 
 refused by horses and cattle and is fit only to be burnt. When the hay 
 is removed, swarms of wriggling brown caterpillars are left. 
 
 The pest evidently prefers dry clover hay. In mixed clover and 
 timothy, the former is eaten and the latter is left, altho 50 percent of 
 such hay may be damaged when the hay is three quarters timothy 
 (Webster). One writer, it should be said, has reported serious dam- 
 age to pure timothy in Kentucky. Webster reared the larvae on grow- 
 ing clover heads, in the insectary, and, furthermore, obtained the moth 
 in large numbers (June 3 to July 15) from masses of dead grape 
 leaves taken May 5 on the ground in a vineyard. In summer the 
 caterpillars are confined to the old unfed hay, and the infestation is 
 worst on hay that has lain over, year after year. 
 
1909] 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 
 
 169 
 
 FIG. 21. Clover Hay-worm, Hypsopygia costalis, larva. 
 Greatly enlarged. 
 
 Osborn mentions Pyralis farinalis, as well as H. costalis, as injur- 
 ing stored clover hay in Iowa. 
 
 Stages. The full-grown caterpillar (Fig. 21) is three quarters of 
 an inch long, and dull brown with an olive tinge usually, tho some of 
 the largest larvae re- 
 tain the pale color of 
 the young larvae. The 
 head, shield, and cau- 
 dal plate do not turn 
 dark until after the 
 last moult, according 
 to Riley. The thorac- 
 ic segments are much 
 wrinkled, and most 
 of the remaining seg- 
 ments are each di- 
 vided by a transverse 
 
 groove into two subsegments, the anterior of which is the larger. On 
 each segment are several smooth shining areas, each bearing a fine 
 white hair. 
 
 The cocoon is half an inch in length, oblong-oval, and composed 
 of white silk, intermingled with excrement and bits of hay. 
 
 The chrysalis, as described by Riley, is honey-yellow, with the 
 segments and members clearly defined by the darker color of the "in- 
 sections." 
 
 The moth (Fig. 22) is small the largest specimens spreading 22 
 mm. and has silky wings tinged with purplish above, margined with 
 
 orange, and fringed with golden yel- 
 low. On each of the upper wings are 
 two large golden spots so situated as 
 to divide the front margin of the wing 
 into thirds; each of these spots con- 
 tinues backward to the hind margin 
 of the wing as a narrow lilac line. On 
 each hind wing are two wavy trans- 
 verse straw-colored lines, one across 
 the middle of the wing, and the other 
 half-way between the first line and the 
 base of the wing. Underneath, the 
 
 wings are pale yellowish with the markings indistinct. Head and legs 
 straw-colored ; antennae and palpi pale orange, tinged with lilaceous. 
 
 Life History and Habits. In Missouri and Ohio there are two 
 generations a year and apparently more or less of a third brood. In 
 winter, larvae of all sizes are to be found in clover hay. In Ohio, Web- 
 ster found pupae no earlier than May 25 ; moths emerged June 12 and 
 laid eggs June 13 to 17, other moths issuing from June 3 to July 15; 
 young larvae (very small to half grown) occurred July 1 ; larvae and 
 pupae were seen August 6 ; and adults of the second generation began 
 
 FIG. 22. Clover Hay-worm, 
 Hypsopygia costalis, moth. 
 Twice natural width. 
 
170 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 to emerge August 8 larvae from these being found August 15. In 
 Connecticut, pupae and many grown larvae occurred June 7 (Britton) ; 
 a pupa formed June 5 gave the moth June 18; most of the moths dis- 
 appeared by July 15 (in a certain barn) ; the first larvae of the second 
 generation were taken in a stack of clover September 1 ; and larvae 
 were not found in barns until two or three weeks later. 
 
 In Illinois the hay-worm is destructive in winter and spring, as 
 elsewhere. The records of the State Entomologist refer to its occurrence 
 January 6 at Griggsville ; February 4, Midland City ; February 18, 
 Shelbyville; March 25, Deland; April 6, Fillmore; May 21, Ridge- 
 farm; and May 27, Parkersburg. A correspondent in Shelbyville re- 
 ported the caterpillar from cheat, mixed with wheat and timothy. 
 
 The office notes include a great many records of the capture of 
 the moths from June 2 onward. June 6, two moths, numerous pupae, 
 and a great many larvae were present in a box of infested clover hay 
 received from Parkersburg; and other moths issued June 10, 19, and 
 20. Dr. Forbes recorded moths of this species as being abundant July 
 10 to 20 and far less abundant July 28. They disappear about the last 
 of July those of the first generation after flying thruout the months 
 of June and July. The moths of the second brood appear a little be- 
 fore the middle of August. Moths are constantly seen from that time 
 until the middle of October, but the last of these perhaps represent a 
 third generation. 
 
 In the breeding-cage, eggs may be laid on growing clover heads, 
 as appears from Webster's experiments, hence it is possible that the 
 same thing occurs in the field. 
 
 Out-of-doors, the moths are seen flitting about clover stacks at 
 dusk or in cloudy weather (June 29, Ohio). At night they often get 
 into houses and fly toward the lights. 
 
 The caterpillars, of all sizes, can be found at any time during the 
 winter, and in a barn they are active when everything outside is frozen. 
 Warmth and moisture are greatest at the bottom of the clover, and 
 there these caterpillars flourish. When you pick them up they are 
 likely to wriggle out of your hand ; they can wriggle backward as 
 well as forward. They spin a lot of silk, and construct little silken 
 cases for themselves, as do the clothes moths ; they are continually 
 spinning, and are often seen hanging from a thread of silk. These 
 caterpillars are gregarious, or sociable ; they gather together while they 
 are feeding, tho they separate and wander when full grown and ready 
 to make their cocoons. 
 
 No insect enemies of this pest are as yet known. 
 
 Control. In a barn, old refuse clover-hay should be removed and 
 burned if this insect is present, before new clover is put in. A stack 
 of clover hay should be raised above the ground on a foundation of 
 logs or rails, in order to keep the bottom of the stack as dry and cool 
 as possible. It has been found that salting the hay at the bottom for 
 two or three feet will preserve it from injury. Some farmers habitu- 
 ally salt their clover hay, using about two quarts of salt to the ton. 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 171 
 
 Webster's experiments indicate that the caterpillars can be killed 
 at once in a clover stack by the use of pyrethrum. He had five tons 
 of clover restacked, dusting it with this insect powder, using ten 
 pounds of pyrethrum to fifty pounds of flour, and found in a sample 
 of the hay that the majority of the caterpillars were dead the day after. 
 
 Britton, in Connecticut, tried bisulfid of carbon in a stack and 
 hydrocyanic acid gas in a barn, but in both instances the clover had 
 become packed so solidly that only a few caterpillars those on the 
 outer part of the heap were killed by the treatment. 
 
 We need to know more about the life history and habits of this 
 insect notwithstanding the large number of articles that have been 
 written on the species, for these, with a few exceptions, add nothing 
 to Riley's original account of 1874. 
 
 Hypsopygia costalis Fab. 
 
 1874. Riley, C. V. Sixth Rep. Ins. Mo., pp. 102-107. 
 1891. Webster, F. M. Insect Life, Vol. IV., pp. 121, 122. 
 1894. Davis, G. C Bull. No. 116, Mich. Agr. Exper. Sta., pp. 
 
 56-58. 
 
 1896. Lintner, J. A. Eleventh Rep. Ins. N. Y., pp. 145-151. 
 1901. Britton, W. E. Twenty- fourth Rep. Conn. Agr. Exper. 
 
 Sta., 1900, p. 314. 
 
 CLOVER LEAF-MIDGE 
 
 Dasyneura trifolii Low 
 
 (Cecidomyia trifolii) 
 
 This midge deserves some attention on account of its conspicuous 
 effects on the leaflets of white clover, the leaflet being folded in halves 
 along the midrib to form a sort of pod, which turns yellowish and at 
 length brownish. Within this pod can be found white or orange mag- 
 gots, or silken cocoons. The maggots change to minute flies so small 
 and inconspicuous as to interest only a specialist. 
 
 The economic importance of the leaf-midge is small, however, 
 and nothing has been added to our published knowledge of the species 
 since Comstock's account of 1880. Some new information appears in 
 the present paper. 
 
 The species, long known in Europe, has been recorded from 
 Washington, D. C. ; it occurs also in Illinois, and in all probability is 
 present in many other parts of the country. 
 
 Food Plants. The leaf-midge feeds on white clover. In Europe 
 it has been said to affect the undermost root-leaves of red clover, but 
 I have not as yet been able to find it on that plant in this region. 
 
 The maggot does not fold the leaflet; the egg is laid before the 
 leaflet has opened out, and after the larvae begin to work the leaflet 
 remains closed. It grows to a normal size, however, (PI. I., Fig. 4) 
 and continues to be green for a time, but eventually turns yellowish 
 near the midrib, where the leaflet bulges out here and there, blisterlike. 
 
172 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 As the gall gets older the blistered areas become specked with brown, 
 and finally the entire gall turns brown and the leaflet dies. Inside the 
 pod are the maggots white or orange, according to age and the 
 white cocoons. The eggs are to be found only between the folded 
 halves of the smallest leaflets, near the ground. 
 
 An affected leaflet continues to grow, and its forage value is 
 scarcely diminished, but its death is hastened a little by the maggots. 
 There is no effect upon the plant as a whole; when only one leaflet of 
 a leaf is affected by the insect, the other two remain healthy for an in- 
 definite time, but all three will at length wilt and die a little pre- 
 maturely. 
 
 It can hardly be said that this insect actually injures white clover, 
 taking everything into consideration. 
 
 Stages. The egg has not been described before. It is like that of 
 many other common midges, being elliptico-cylindrical with a slight 
 curvature, colorless and translucent when laid, but showing an internal 
 red spot on the second day not before and becoming pale orange in 
 color. Length, 0.3 mm. ; width, 0.075 mm., on an average. Several 
 eggs are laid, side by side usually, as in Plate I., Fig. 5, in which the 
 variation in the length of the eggs is to be laid to the midge instead of 
 to the artist. 
 
 The newly born larva is colorless and transparent, and 0.27 mm. 
 in length; soon it becomes white; when old it is orange (PL I., Fig. 6), 
 and when full grown its length is 1.5 to 2 mm. The skin is coarsely 
 granulate. The spiracular tubercles are arranged precisely as in the 
 larva of the clover seed-midge in fact, this arrangement is the same 
 in several species that I have examined. The form of the sternal 
 spatula (PL I., Fig. 7) is, however, different from that of D. leguminic- 
 ola, the only species likely to be confused with this one as it occurs on 
 clover. 
 
 The cocoon is oval in general outline, and 1.5 mm. long. Often 
 it is flattened a little from contact with the leaflet or with other co- 
 coons. 
 
 The pupa, orange in color, has a darker median ventral stripe, and 
 blackish eyes, as Comstock says. The anterior border of the pro- 
 thorax is deeply notched, and there are two long, excurved, meso- 
 thoracic horns. 
 
 Comstock gave a translation of the original description of this 
 midge, which need not be repeated here. Rearing the midge from 
 white clover, there is no difficulty in determining the species. Catch- 
 ing it on the wing, the leaf-midge needs to be distinguished from the 
 seed-midge, which it resembles. Figures 3 and 8 of Plate I. show the 
 differences between the two species. The leaf-midge (Fig. 8) is the 
 smaller of the two, the female measuring 1.6 mm. in length. Both 
 species have the red abdomen, but the dorsal bands of black scales are 
 much larger and denser in trifolii than in leguminicola, and the scales 
 do not rub off so easily, so that the abdomen in the former species is 
 usually blackish. In addition, the leaf-midge has 14 or 15 antenna! 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 173 
 
 segments, as against 16 or 17 in the seed-midge. The male, distin- 
 guishable from the female by the large clasping organs at the end of 
 the abdomen, is also smaller than the male of the seed-midge. 
 
 Life History. The podlike galls (PI. I., Fig. 4) of the leaf-midge 
 are common on white clover thruout the growing season, during which 
 the insect in one or another of its stages can always be found in some 
 of the galls. Usually several stages in the development of the insect 
 are represented at the same time in a single gall. Frequently one to 
 six individuals inhabit the same gall, and there may be more ; I know 
 of twenty eggs being deposited by a single female on one leaflet. 
 Larva* from eggs laid at the same time do not all develop equally ; 
 some of them outdistance the rest, and when the gall is crowded with 
 the maggots, some of them die off in the competition for nourish- 
 ment. 
 
 The earliest date that I have recorded for the galls is June 21, at 
 which time larvae and cocoons were present; thereafter I found the 
 species in various stages every few days up to October 5, on which 
 date larvae were common. The latest eggs and larvae are killed by the 
 frost, along with the leaves which they inhabit. This fact in connec- 
 tion with what we know about the habits of the species warrants the 
 inference that it probably winters in the cocoon, tho possibly as a fly. 
 
 My observations indicate four full broods a year in this place, 
 with scattering and ill-fated members of a fifth brood. Each genera- 
 tion requires about one month, on an average, for its development. In 
 the field the broods overlap enough to make their separation by field 
 observations a little difficult. Yet there are times when almost all the 
 galls are empty, indicating an interval between two bropds, when the 
 species is represented almost entirely by winged adults. Thus, Au- 
 gust 14, 1903, when I examined a great number of recently made galls, 
 I found 85 without living contents, tho remnants of cocoons were 
 often present; 9 with cocoons (one to four in each instance) ; 2 with 
 full-grown or large larvae; and 2 with larvae that had just hatched. 
 Again, August 15, 1907, I opened several hundred of the galls and 
 found nearly all of them to contain cocoons or full-grown larvae ; only 
 one or two had white larvae, and very many of the galls were empty, 
 tho not more than a month old. Thus a break between two genera- 
 tions occurred about August 15 in two years. 
 
 Eggs laid August 1 gave six larvae, the flies from which issued 
 August 22; this is the shortest life history that I have found for this 
 species. The egg period is six days as a rule; thus, eggs laid August 
 13 (2:45 to 3:15 p. m.) hatched August 19 (at noon). The period 
 in the cocoon varies. From two cocoons made August 3, the imagines 
 emerged August 13 ; in several other instances, nine days was the 
 period. On the other hand, a larva that was making a cocoon August 
 5 did not give the adult until August 27. 
 
 Habits. The midges can be obtained simply by picking the galls 
 and keeping them on damp sand or cotton- wool. A better way, how- 
 ever, is to transplant such plants as bear the galls, because the leaves 
 do not keep fresh very long after being picked. 
 
174 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 To get the eggs and the subsequent stages it is only necessary to 
 turn a lot of the midges loose on potted white clover under a lamp 
 chimney (the narrow cylindrical kind) covered at the top with net- 
 ting, making sure that the plant bears some young unopened leaves. 
 It is best, also, to cut off most of the old leaves, especially in order to 
 facilitate observation. 
 
 These little flies mate readily under such conditions, and lay eggs 
 freely, as I have several times observed. After coition, which may 
 not last longer than a minute, oviposition occurs within an hour or so. 
 The female either drops to the ground or alights on the plant and 
 walks downward. In either event she finds, after more or less explora- 
 tion, a young leaflet still folded in halves. Standing at the base of 
 this, she wriggles her long flexible ovipositor in between the two con- 
 tiguous faces of the leaflet as far as possible ; at intervals a slight wave 
 of distention passes back along the ovipositor, indicating probably the 
 passage of an egg. Usually several eggs are laid on the same leaflet 
 sometimes a dozen or more. After many eggs are laid, the abdomen of 
 the female is noticeably smaller. 
 
 In some way the insect prevents the leaflet from opening out. The 
 larva is quite unable to fold a leaflet that has already spread out. If 
 placed on such a leaf the larvae cannot even hold on to it, and rolls oft". 
 Like other midge larvae, they require some tight crevice in which to 
 develop. 
 
 Like them also, the maggots of the clover leaf-midge are very 
 sensitive to moisture, contracting and becoming motionless when it is 
 dry, and resuming activity when it is moist. Dryness prolongs the 
 period of development and retards the emergence of the fly. The 
 long record just given 6f twenty-two days from cocoon-making to 
 emergence was due in some measure to dryness. The larva found 
 making a cocoon August 5, was put into a small glass-covered box and 
 pressed up against the glass by means of dry cotton- wool, so that I 
 could watch the process of cocoon formation under the microscope. 
 The larva spun for awhile, and then left its cocoon unfinished and 
 wandered about, but it was contracted and motionless August 6 to 11. 
 On the latter date the cotton was moistened, and soon the larva began to 
 wriggle about in all directions, away from the light, and kept this up all 
 day. Coming to rest again, the larva contracted without making a 
 new cocoon, and gave an imago August 27. The larva often pupates 
 without making a cocoon, if taken out of its gall. 
 
 The cocoon is evidently composed of silken threads, as Comstock 
 said. Under the microscope the thread can be seen to issue from the 
 mouth of the larva, which swings the fore part of the body to and fro 
 as it spins. This fact is mentioned to counteract the old statement 
 that the cocoon is an exudation around the body of the larva. 
 
 The leaf-midge is not without natural enemies. I have found the 
 larvae and pupae of a chalcid in the galls among the midge larvae. The 
 chalcid is not common ; I found it in only 1 percent of the galls, out 
 of hundreds examined. The chalcid larva might hastily be mistaken 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 175 
 
 for one of the midge larvse, as it has much the same size and color 
 white or orange. Its body is not so blunt as that of the maggots, how- 
 ever, and tapers anteriorly. Furthermore, the chalcid larva is far more 
 active than a midge larva. While the latter wriggles about sluggishly 
 and aimlessly, the former wriggles along hurriedly, as if it had some 
 end in view. A few times I have seen a chalcid larva attack and feed 
 upon a maggot of the midge, it being predaceous instead of parasitic. 
 The chalcid becomes a naked pupa within the gall, among any of the 
 maggots that may have escaped its attacks. 
 
 The clover leaf-midge needs no discussion from the point of view 
 of control. Where the clover is frequently pastured or cut (as on 
 lawns) it is hard to find any signs of the leaf-midge. 
 
 Dasyneura (Cecidomyia) trifolii Low 
 
 " 1880. Comstock, J. H. Rep. [ U. S. ] Comm. Agr., 1879, pp. 
 197-199. 
 
 CLOVER CALLIPTERUS 
 Callipterus trifolii Monell 
 
 This aphid is common in our clover fields every year, but has not 
 been destructive as yet. It is far less numerous than the large green 
 aphid, Macrosiphum pisi, and is not wide-spread and gregarious like 
 that species, but is scattered, and rather solitary in habit. 
 
 C. trifolii, as found on clover, will be recognized, generally 
 speaking, as a small yellowish green or yellow species with six longi- 
 tudinal rows of dark tubercles on the abdomen. 
 
 This species has received almost no mention in our literature, 
 largely because it has done nothing to attract attention. . The material 
 which we studied was determined tentatively by me from the original 
 description, and positively by the author of the species, to whom speci- 
 mens were sent by Mr. J. J. Davis. 
 
 Callipterus trifolii was described from Washington, D. C., by 
 Monell, who found it again in Missouri. It is common in Illinois, and 
 is reported authentically from Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, North Da- 
 kota, New York, Delaware, and Virginia. 
 
 Descriptions. The following descriptions, sufficiently detailed for 
 the recognition of the species, and supplementary to the original de- 
 scription, are adapted from manuscript descriptions made by J. J. 
 Davis, in cooperation with Monell. 
 
 The viviparous females (whether winged or not) are pale yellow- 
 ish green. Eyes dark red to brown. Antennae pale greenish basally, 
 dusky apically, faintly imbricate, and as long as or a little longer than 
 the body. Legs pale, dusky at the joints ; tarsi blackish. Abdomen 
 with six longitudinal rows of dusky setiferous tubercles. Style globu- 
 lar; cornicles tubercular; both a little dusky. 
 
 In the wingless viviparous female (PI II., Fig. 5) the dark ab- 
 dominal tubercles bear conspicuous capitate hairs, and the length of 
 the female averages 1.6 mm. 
 
176 
 
 BULLETIN No. 134 
 
 [April, 
 
 The winged viviparous female (PI. II., Fig. 6) has a row of ten 
 to twelve sensoria on the third antennal segment. Wings hyaline ; 
 veins dark brown to black, narrowly bordered with brownish, with a 
 small brown patch at the outer end of each vein ; basal half of stigmal 
 vein obsolescent; discoidals as in the figure. The abdominal tuber- 
 cles of the two inner rows are oblong, and each of them bears two fine 
 setae. The remaining tubercles, more or less circular, have each but 
 one seta. Average length, 1.4 mm. 
 
 The wingless oviparous female is at first pale yellow, but the ab- 
 domen (excepting the last two segments) becomes progressively 
 orange as the eggs develop in the body, and the orange color may 
 eventually extend over most of the thorax. Eyes black. The anten- 
 nae do not reach to the cornicles, and the third antennal segment has 
 eight or ten circular sensoria. Hind tibiae swollen, and with sensoria. 
 Dorsal abdominal tubercles essentially as in the winged viviparous 
 female. Average length, 1.8 mm. 
 
 In the winged male the head and thorax are pale olivaceous 
 green, and the abdomen pale yellowish green, with conspicuous black 
 dorsal spots. Antennae black (excepting the first two segments) and 
 as long as the body, with sensoria as follows: 12-15 on segment 
 three; 2-4 on four; 3-5 on five. Wings essentially as in the female. 
 The large black oval setiferous spots of the abdomen fall chiefly into 
 four rows two dorsal and two lateral, with scattered spots between 
 the former and the latter, on each side. Style and cornicles dusky. 
 Average length, 1.2 mm. 
 
 The absolute lengths of the segments of the antennae and legs, as 
 well as those of the cornicles, are, as in other aphids, too variable to 
 be of much importance as specific characters. The relative lengths 
 are more constant, however, and hence more important for the sys- 
 tematist. They appear from the following table, which consists of the 
 averages of many measurements made from Urbana specimens by J. J. 
 Davis and from types of Mr. Monell made by himself. 
 
 C. trifolii 
 
 
 
 
 Ant< 
 
 ;nna? 
 
 
 
 
 Cor- 
 
 
 I 
 
 II 
 
 III 
 
 IV 
 
 V 
 
 VI 
 
 Style 
 
 nicles 
 
 Wingless viviparous female 
 Winged viviparous female 
 Winged viviparous female, 
 Monell's types 
 Wingless oviparous female 
 Winged male 
 
 07 mm. 
 07 
 
 .05 
 .07 
 .06 
 
 .05 
 .05 
 
 .04 
 .05 
 .05 
 
 .51 
 .51 
 
 .44 
 !40 
 .51 
 
 34 
 .36 
 
 .31 
 .19 
 30 
 
 .31 
 
 .32 
 
 .28 
 .20 
 .29 
 
 .15+. 16 
 .16+. 16 
 
 .15+. 13 
 .13+. 14 
 .15+ 15 
 
 .17 
 .13 
 
 .06 
 .06 
 
 .06 
 .04 
 
 The egg, hitherto undescribed, is much like that of any other 
 aphid in being elliptical, 0.57 mm. long, and 0.25 mm. broad, but has a 
 characteristic bright orange-color when recently laid. 
 
1909] 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 
 
 177 
 
 Life History, etc. This aphid winters as an egg in the vicinity 
 of Urbana, and I have found as yet no evidence that the female hiber- 
 nates. The course of the life history differs but little from that of 
 other aphids. The eggs produce viviparous females, and these con- 
 stitute the successive generations up to the end of the season, when 
 winged males and wingless oviparous females are brought forth vivip- 
 arously. In this species, a large proportion if not the majority of 
 the viviparous females are winged. 
 
 Beginning with a viviparous female which issued from the egg 
 March 27, Mr. R. L. Webster followed the successive generations 
 thru the season and obtained a maximum of nineteen, the final genera- 
 tion appearing October 18, in the insectary. The individuals of this 
 generation were still very small on November 11, and disappeared 
 thereafter. The more important of R. L. Webster's observations are 
 given in the following table. 
 
 C. trifolii 
 
 Genera- 
 tion 
 
 Birth 
 
 Maturity Death 
 
 Days to 
 mature 
 
 Days of 
 life 
 
 Number 
 of young 
 
 1 
 
 Mar. 27 
 
 t 
 Apr. 20 May 9 
 
 24 
 
 43 
 
 36 
 
 2 
 
 Apr. 21 
 
 May 3 May 21 
 
 12 
 
 30 21 
 
 3 
 
 May 6 
 
 May 18 May 26 
 
 12 
 
 20 34 
 
 4 
 
 May 15 
 
 May 30 June 12 
 
 15 
 
 28 25 
 
 5 
 
 May 30 
 
 June 7 June 19 
 
 8 
 
 20 46 
 
 6 
 
 June 7 
 
 June 15 June 21 
 
 8 
 
 14 25 
 
 7 
 
 June 15 
 
 June 22 July 7 
 
 7 
 
 22 55 
 
 8 
 
 June 24 
 
 July 3 July 3 
 
 9 
 
 9 
 
 13 
 
 9 
 
 July 3 
 
 July 12 July 18 
 
 9 
 
 15 
 
 13 
 
 10 
 
 July 13 
 
 July 18 July 31 
 
 5 
 
 18 
 
 34 
 
 11 
 
 July 19 
 
 July 29 Aug. 3 
 
 10 
 
 15 
 
 23 
 
 12 
 
 July 29 
 
 Aug. 5 Aug. 22 
 
 7 
 
 24 
 
 70 
 
 13 
 
 Aug. 5 
 
 Aug. 11 Sept. 2 
 
 6 
 
 28 
 
 75 
 
 14 
 
 Aug. 11 
 
 Aug. 21 Sept. 9 
 
 10 
 
 29 
 
 60 
 
 15 
 
 Aug. 21 
 
 Aug. 28 Sept. 11 
 
 7 
 
 21 
 
 36 
 
 16 
 
 Sept. 10 
 
 Sept. 18 Sept. 28 
 
 8 
 
 18 
 
 20 
 
 17 
 
 Sept 19 
 
 Oct. 2 Oct. 9 
 
 13 
 
 20 6 
 
 18 
 
 Oct. 2 
 
 Oct. 18 ? 
 
 16 40+ j ? 
 
 19 
 
 Oct. 18 
 
 ? ? 
 
 ? 
 
 24+ ? 
 
 Ave 
 
 rages 
 
 10 
 
 22 
 
 34.8 
 
 
 The averages are made from the first seventeen generations. The 
 number of young produced per day by one female ranges from none 
 to thirteen, with an average of 3.7 ; and the bearing period of the 
 female averages 12.1 days. 
 
 Comparing this table with that for M. pisi (p. 142) slight differ- 
 ences are apparent in the length of life and the period before "maturity. 
 These differences are of no weight, however, in view of the great 
 variability of both species in both these respects. A few more obser- 
 vations would have changed, one way or the other, these averages, which 
 are so nearly alike. The averages show, rather, that M. pisi and C. 
 
178 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 trifolii agree essentially as regards the time from birth to maturity, 
 the bearing period, and the length of life, the number of generations 
 being essentially the same in both species. C. trifolii produces, how- 
 ever, only half as many young per day as M. pisi (3.7 young as against 
 6), and this difference serves to account for the relatively smaller num- 
 bers of C. trifolii in the field compared with M. pisi. 
 
 Wintered eggs hatched March 27, 28, and 29, according to our 
 notes. 
 
 On red clover, brought into the laboratory in November, and 
 grown, there were found, January 29, a large number of the 
 orange oviparous females, which laid eggs in profusion. The average 
 number of eggs in the abdomen of the mother is ten, as found by J. J. 
 Davis. 
 
 The fungus Empusa aphidis attacks this plant-louse thruout the 
 season, in damp weather, just as it does M. pisi; and many of the in- 
 sect enemies of the latter species attack C. trifolii also. 
 
 Callipterus trifolii maintains its existence every year, but has 
 always been a sporadic species. 
 
 Callipterus trifolii- Monell. 
 
 1882. Monell, J. T. Can. Ent., Vol. XIV., p. 14. 
 
 1908. Davis, J. J. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., Vol. I., pp. 256-258. 
 
 CLOVER STEM-BORER 
 Languria mozardi Latr. 
 
 The stem-borer is of but secondary importance among the in- 
 jurious insects of clover; it has never been a pest, so far as I can 
 learn. 
 
 The slender yellow larva eats out the pith of the clover stem, 
 making a long burrow, with brown discolored walls. The entire de- 
 velopment takes place within the clover stem, and the adults fly abroad 
 as slender beetles with dark blue wing-covers, and red thorax and 
 head. 
 
 Tho the beetle is well known to collectors, scarcely anything has 
 been published on its life history since Comstock's brief account in 
 1880. 
 
 Distribution. This species was originally described from North 
 America, and the genus Languria does not appear in the catalogs of 
 European beetles. In this country L. mozardi has been reported from 
 Pennsylvania, the District of Columbia, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, 
 Kansas, Nebraska, and elsewhere. Generally speaking, it inhabits the 
 middle and the southern states, some of the western states, and parts 
 of Canada. 
 
 Food Plants and Injuries. The clover stem-borer is by no means 
 limited to red clover and mammoth clover, but feeds also on the fol- 
 lowing plants, as C. M. Weed, Chittenden, and Webster found : wild 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 179 
 
 sweet clover (Melilotus alba), pink fleabane (Erigeron philadelphi- 
 cus), daisy fleabane (E. ramosus), mare's tail (E. canadensis), rag- 
 weed (Ambrosia trifida), coneflower (Rudbeckia laciniata), yarrow 
 (Achillea mille folium), oxeye daisy (Chrysanthemum leucanthe- 
 mum), thistle (Cnicus altissimus), wild lettuce (Lactuca canadensis 
 and L. Horidana), bellflower (Campanula americana), nettle (Urtica 
 gracilis and U. dioica) and timothy (Phleum pratense). Most of 
 these are Composite, it will be noticed, and nearly all are weeds. 
 
 Injury. The beetles do not lay their eggs in seedling clover, but 
 find clover that is more than one year old and select only the larger 
 stems of that. 
 
 By autumn, red clover sown in spring has developed stems of con- 
 siderable size, and the beetles are present but they do not lay eggs in 
 autumn, in my experience.. 
 
 The larva, by eating the pith, hollows out the clover stem, making 
 a long burrow, the walls of which turn brown. By cutting stems 
 across, beginning near the ground, and looking at the cut ends, one 
 can see whether the pith is white and solid or whether it has been 
 eaten out by this borer. The larvae eat usually nothing but the pith, 
 which happens to be the part that the plant can best afford to lose. 
 
 Comstock wrote, "While they do not kill the stem outright, they 
 gradually weaken it and eventually cause its destruction, having also, 
 of course, a very injurious effect upon the maturing of the seed." Un- 
 doubtedly the insect is injurious, but it is not so injurious as might be 
 supposed. The loss of the pith may affect the nutrition of the plant 
 to some extent, since the pith contains reserve food-material in the 
 form of starch. The chief effect of the stem-borer is, however, a 
 mechanical one. The stems that are hollowed out fall to the ground 
 prematurely, tho not until they have attained a considerable size. One 
 can find the borers most abundantly in the large prostrate stems rather 
 than in the stems that remain erect. The plants that lodge carry 
 their flowers to the ground, become soiled with dirt, and are not easy 
 to mow. Mammoth clover, running far into the season, lodges badly 
 from the work of the borer; while medium red clover, if cut when it 
 should be, escapes practically all injury from this insect. 
 
 Rarely the borer occurs in a small soft stem and causes it to wilt : 
 for in such a stem the larva eats not only the pith, but also some of 
 the adjacent ducts, thru which water is conveyed up the stem to the 
 leaves. In old stems these ducts are too tough to be eaten by the 
 larva. 
 
 Were this insect more numerous it might gradually develop into 
 a pest of considerable importance. It is most common on clover, but 
 has to its credit the fact that it affects also a considerable number of 
 weeds. 
 
 July 6 we found 41 percent of the old stems to be infested by 
 this borer. This was in the hay crop as yet uncut. On the same 
 day we examined 61 new stems the second growth after cutting 
 and found two egg pits as the only signs of the borer. The beetles 
 
180 
 
 BULLETIN No. 134 
 
 [April, 
 
 had disappeared, almost without exception, by this date. July 7, 43 
 percent of the old stems, taken from many different places roadside 
 as well as field contained the insect. 
 
 Stages. The beetle (Fig. 23) is conspicuous on account of its 
 slender form, dark blue wing-covers, and shiny red head and thorax. 
 Length 4 mm. to 7.8 mm. In Languria mozardi, as distinguished from 
 other species of the genus, the antennae are black, with the club five- 
 segmented; the legs are red, with the outer half of the femur black 
 and the tibiae and tarsi often more or less dusky; last three abdominal 
 segments black, the abdomen otherwise red ; elytra rounded at apices, 
 not sinuate, punctate-striate with the interspaces impunctate; scutellum 
 red ; head and thorax sparsely punctate. 
 
 FIG. 23. 
 
 FIG. 24. 
 
 Clover Stem-borer, Languria mozardi: Fig. 23, beetle, greatly enlarged; Fig. 24, egg, 
 in natural position, four times natural length. 
 
 The egg (Fig. 24) is translucent cream-yellow, paler at each end, 
 elliptico-cylindrical and slightly curving, with one end slightly more 
 tapering than the other. One specimen was 1.5 mm, long and 0.3 mm. 
 broad ; another, 1.9 mm. by 0.5 mm. 
 
 The larva (Fig. 25) is slender, subcylindrical, 8 mm. long and 0.9 
 mm. wide when full grown, and light yellow, with a pair of brown 
 curving anal hooks. The thoracic legs are well developed and there is 
 a single anal proleg. Comstock gives other details. At birth the larva 
 is 2 mm. long; when four days old, 3 mm.; nine days, 5 mm.; full 
 grown, as above. 
 
 The pupa (Fig. 26) is yellow, slender, has a large head, and is 6 
 mm. long. 
 
1909] 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 
 
 181 
 
 Life History. There is but one generation a year in this latitude. 
 Here the species hibernates as a beetle. We have kept it alive over 
 winter. It may also winter as a larva, as Chittenden found larvae 
 
 FIG. 25. 
 
 FIG. 26. 
 
 Clover Stem-borer, Languria mozardi: Fig. 25, larva; Fig. 26, pupa. 
 Both greatly enlarged. 
 
 remaining as such from November to April, in stems of ragweed. In 
 late winter and early spring the beetles are to be found in red-clover 
 fields under the rubbish on the ground. In spring they eat clover 
 leaves to some extent, but do no conspicuous damage, as they are 
 comparatively few. In May and June these beetles mate; by July 
 10, nearly all of them have died off; rarely does one of the wintered 
 beetles survive into August. Young larvae are common in the clover 
 stems in the last week of June and early in July, for the most part ; 
 tho eggs are not uncommon early in July, and occur, rarely, as late as 
 July 17. Larvae of all ages are common in clover stems in July and 
 thereafter; pupae are most numerous about August 15; and the beetles 
 of the new generation emerge from the first of August up to the mid- 
 dle of September, if not later. After the autumn frosts the beetles 
 are to be found on the ground under the debris. 
 
 Such is the life history, in condensed form, for this insect in this 
 part of Illinois. Some details of importance follow. 
 
 Eggs laid May 19 hatched May 24; those laid July 14 hatched 
 July 17. The egg period was three days also in the case of eggs 
 that hatched July 8, 9, and 10. Eggs were taken in large num- 
 bers in the field July 5, 6, and 7, at which time 20 percent of all the 
 large clover stems examined contained each an egg. In one field 41 
 percent of the clover stems, taken at random, had egg pits July 6, with 
 either eggs or small larvae present. 
 
182 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 Beetles that had hibernated, died in the insectary July 5, 9, and 
 26, after having been kept there with proper food, etc., since winter. 
 By July 5 most of the beetles are gone from the fields ; only a few 
 stragglers continue to live, there being a conspicuous break between 
 the last of the wintered beetles and the first beetles of the new gen- 
 eration. Larvae, nearly or quite grown, and pupae are common in 
 old clover stems July 28 to August 7. About July 30 the larvae are 
 three times as numerous as the pupae; but after the first week in Au- 
 gust the latter exceed the former in number. The new beetles emerge 
 mostly thruout August and during the first half of September. In 
 the insectary they issued almost every day from August 3 to Sep- 
 tember 14, and one emerged September 20. Most of them have is- 
 sued by August 26, however. At that date the burrows are almost all 
 vacant, and the beetles are abroad in the field, feeding a little, seeking 
 shelter at every cold spell, becoming more and more sluggish, and 
 finally dormant. Not until spring does the reproductive instinct 
 awaken. 
 
 Habits. Oviposition occurs to some extent late in May and early 
 in July, but for the most part in June, and has been witnessed in the 
 daytime. The female gnaws a small pit on the stem of a plant, as 
 Chittenden and others have observed. On clover stems these pits can 
 be found easily. Unless freshly made, the pit is brown, in contrast to 
 the green of the stem ; a pit that is green is less than twenty- four hours 
 old, and indicates, as a rule, the presence of an egg. The egg-pit is 
 shallow, oval or round in outline, and not more than one sixteenth of 
 an inch in length. In the center of the pit a minute linear or elliptic- 
 al slit opens into the pith. Upon cutting open the stem, the egg is 
 seen on the inner wall of the stem, often opposite the pit, but sometimes 
 as far from it as four to six millimeters. The female makes the pit 
 with her mandibles, then pushes the end of the abdomen thru the bot- 
 tom of the pit and into the pith, these operations taking eight minutes 
 in one instance and sixteen in another, as observed by E. O. G. Kelly. 
 Sometimes a female gnaws out a pit without laying the egg. In red 
 clover the eggs are laid singly, almost invariably, in my experience, 
 rarely two being found together. In another plant (Leucanthemum} , 
 however, Mr. Girault saw at least fifteen eggs deposited in the same 
 nidus (Ent. News, Vol. XVIIL, pp. 366, 367). 
 
 The egg-pits occur on the main stem of a red clover plant any- 
 where from three to twenty inches from the ground, averaging ten 
 inches, the old pits having been carried up more or less by the growth 
 of the stem. Fresh pits, especially those on small stems, are usually 
 not far from the ground. 
 
 The larva, feeding on the pith (Fig. 27), tunnels out the main stem 
 for sometimes two feet. If two larvae occupy the same stem their 
 combined efforts may produce a burrow as long as thirty-two inches, 
 extending from the main stem out into one of the larger branches. 
 The largest larvae and the pupae (Fig. 28) are found usually at the 
 lower end of the burrow, an inch or two from the ground, the pupa 
 
1909] 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 
 
 183 
 
 with the head upward. The beetle (Fig. 29) after issuing from the 
 pupa lingers in the burrow for a' while, and then escapes by gnawing 
 a round hole straight thru the wall of the stem. These exit openings 
 are rather conspicuous. 
 
 FIG. 27. 
 
 FIG. 28. 
 
 FIG. 29. 
 
 Clover Stem-borer, Langiiria mosardi: Fig. 27, larva, in clover stem; Fig. 28, pupa, in same, 
 both twice natural length; Fig. 29, beetle, on clover stem, slightly enlarged. 
 
 Natural Enemies. Comstock mentioned two parasites that he 
 found in the burrows of this stalk-borer : a small black chalcid, with a 
 dark naked pupa; and a yellowish ichneumonid, the pupa of which is 
 enclosed in a delicate white silken cocoon. C. M. Weed gave a figure 
 and made brief mention of such a chalcid. I have found the chalcid 
 probably the same one in considerable numbers by examining an 
 immense number of stems. The egg of the parasite is found beside 
 that of the stem-borer, and hatches a little later than the latter egg. 
 The chalcid larva bites into the Languria larva and feeds upon it as an 
 external parasite. Now and then the chalcid larva detaches itself 
 from its host, but finds the latter again whenever necessary. The 
 Languria larva dies; the parasite survives and becomes a naked pupa 
 in the burrow, from which the adult emerges by cutting a minute 
 round hole thru the wall of the stem. 
 
 Eggs, larvae, and pupae of the parasite were most frequent in the 
 burrows July 6 to 8. The adult chalcids issued from July 11 to Au- 
 gust 5, most numerously, however, in the last week of July. Au- 
 gust 26 nearly all the Languria burrows were empty, and the stems 
 showed the exits of the host and those of the parasite. 
 
 An ichneumonid cocoon taken in a Languria burrow by me Au- 
 gust 7 gave the adult August 11. 
 
 Neither of these species has been determined. 
 
184 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 Control. The clover stem-borer has not yet attracted much at- 
 tention as an injurious insect. Such effects as it produces are not of 
 the violent sort which attract notice. For a time I was in doubt as to 
 whether the lodging of the plants was due in any degree to this in- 
 sect; later, I found that affected stems do not lodge until they get 
 large, but then fall sooner than unaffected stems. 
 
 Every year the farmer unknowingly kills off large numbers of 
 these insects when he cuts his hay crop, whether he cuts it early or 
 late, for in the latter part of June and thruout July in this latitude 
 the great majority of the insects are inside the clover stems as larvae 
 or pupse. The old beetles from the previous year are practically gone 
 by July 5, and the new beetles do not issue from the stems until about 
 the first of August. If the cutting of the hay crop is neglected, how- 
 ever, and left far into July, much of the clover will be flat on the 
 ground from the work of this insect. I had this tested on the uni- 
 versity farm, and when the clover was cut, heard, from the man who 
 mowed the field, certain appropriate comments upon the amount of 
 clover which had lodged. 
 
 If the red clover is cut when it should be to make the best fod- 
 der only about three stems in one hundred of the new growth will 
 show the insect. To find many larvae in July and early August one 
 has to search in uncut field-clover, or in clover growing wild on the 
 border of a field or by the side of the road or the railroad track. The 
 practice of mowing .and destroying volunteer clover is well worth the 
 little time that it takes. 
 
 Languria mozardi Latr. 
 
 1880. Comstock, J. H. Rep. [U. S.] Comm. Agr., 1879, pp. 
 
 199, 200. 
 
 1881. Lintner, J. A.^Fortieth Rep. N. Y. State Agr. Soc., 1880. 
 
 pp. 18-20. 
 1890. Weed, C. M. Amer. Nat., Vol. XXIV., p. 867. 
 
 Weed, C. M. Bull. Ohio Agr. Exper. Sta., Sec. Ser., Vol. 
 
 III., No. 8, pp. 235-238. 
 Chittenden, F. H. Insect Life, Vol. II., pp. 346, 347. 
 
 CLOVER SITONES 
 Sit ones ftavescens All. 
 
 This small brown curculio eats the leaves of clovers and alfalfa, 
 and its white footless grubs feed at the crown or at the roots of the 
 same plants. It has rarely been reported as injurious in this country, 
 but needs to be watched, nevertheless. 
 
 The species is abundant in the Atlantic states, especially near the 
 seashore, is on record from Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, and Minnesota, 
 and doubtless has a much wider distribution. Everything indicates 
 that it came from Europe, where this and other species of the genus 
 are injurious to clover and lucerne (alfalfa). 
 
1909] 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 
 
 185 
 
 Food Plants and Injuries. White clover, alsike, red clover, and 
 alfalfa are known to be eaten freely by this insect. In Europe 
 another food plant is the grass Poa annua. Webster found a strong 
 preference for white clover and alsike over red clover in Indiana. 
 Osborn and Gossard found red clover to be eaten readily in Iowa. 
 Here in Illinois red clover is commonly eaten, but white clover shows 
 rather more of the injury. Alfalfa is also eaten to some extent. The 
 beetles eat at the edges of the leaves, and the larvae feed at the roots 
 or the bases of the stems. 
 
 The leaves are bitten out in a characteristic manner, on acount of 
 the methodical feeding habits of the beetle. On an expanded leaflet 
 the beetle eats inward from the margin, making a small hemispherical 
 or U-shaped gap. The symmetrical injury, shown in Figure 30, is, how- 
 ever, frequent, as the beetle often, if not usually, selects a young 
 tender leaflet that is still folded in halves along the midrib, and notches 
 out both margins at once ; or it may bite out a hemispherical notch at 
 the midrib, resulting in a round hole when the leaflet opens. When 
 
 FIG. 30. Leaves of white clover showing 
 characteristic injury by beetle of Sitones 
 ftavescens. Natural size. 
 
 all three of the folded leaflets are as 
 yet side by side, the beetle at one 
 operation produces the effect shown 
 in the leaf at the left in Figure 30. 
 A single notch constitutes a meal, 
 whether the beetle happens to eat one 
 thickness of the leaf or six. 
 
 The youngest larvae work at the 
 
 bases of the stems or the bases of the roots, tho most of the injury by 
 them is done on the roots. . A few of these larvae, biting out the roots 
 near the crown, can cause a plant to wilt, even tho no other insect is 
 present. 
 
 Aside from the serious injury done to white clover and the at- 
 tacks upon alsike in Indiana in 1885, as reported by Webster, this 
 species has not put itself on record as an injurious insect in this 
 
 FIG. 31. Sitones ftavescens. Greatly 
 enlarged. 
 
186 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 country. In Europe, however, it has now and then shown what it is 
 capable of doing in the way of damage. 
 
 Stages. The beetle (Fig. 31) is a small dark brown or rusty 
 brown curculio, 5.5 mm. in length, with the beak short and broad. It 
 is distinguished from other species of the same genus by the absence 
 of erect setae on the interspaces of the elytra, and by its minute, nar- 
 row, hairlike scales. On fresh specimens the pronotum shows a pale 
 median dorsal line and a pale stripe on each side, the lateral stripes 
 being continued forward on the head, above the eyes, and along the 
 beak ; and also backward on the elytra for a short distance. 
 
 In the genus Sitones, of which we have several species that are 
 potentially injurious, the mandibles are stout, convex on the outside, 
 and roughly punctured ; and the antennal grooves extend forward to 
 the bases of the mandibles, not to mention other characters given by 
 Le Conte and Horn, and also by Casey. As in other Curculionidce, the 
 male has one more "dorsal segment" than the female, owing to the 
 division of the pygidium into two segments. 
 
 The egg is subspherical, yellowish white at first, turning greenish, 
 and becoming black in two or three days. The diameter is nearly 0.4 
 mm., tho the egg is a trifle longer than broad. 
 
 The larva, 5 mm. long when full grown, is a stout, yellowish 
 white, footless grub. The head is small and yellowish brown, with 
 whitish lines. Body segments a little larger than the head ; the second 
 and the third a little larger than the first. The legs are represented by 
 fleshy double tubercles. The abdominal segments gradually decrease 
 in size and bear longer hairs than the thorax, these being longest on 
 the small ninth segment, which terminates in a short, stout, truncate 
 pseudopod. 
 
 The larvae assume a hooklike position, as mentioned by Webster, 
 the head and thorax making almost a right angle with the abdomen. 
 
 The pupa, 5 mm. in length, is pale yellowish, bearing hairs, 
 spinules, and tubercles. The abdomen gradually diminishes in size, and 
 the segments bear a few short reddish spinules, transversely arranged ; 
 the ninth segment has also two long, slender, converging lateral spines, 
 whitish basally and reddish apically, and toothed near the middle. 
 The pupa and the larva have been described in minute detail by 
 Xambeu. 
 
 Life History. Scarcely anything on the life history of this spe- 
 cies has appeared in our literature since Webster's useful article of 
 twenty years ago. In central Illinois the general course of the life 
 history is markedly like that of the clover leaf-weevil. There is one 
 generation each year. The beetles live thru summer and autumn, and 
 try to hibernate. The eggs are not laid until late in the season, but 
 they hatch in the same season and the little larvae hibernate. 
 
 March 23 I saw the characteristic signs of the beetle on one red 
 clover leaf, recently expanded, and again March 28, on white clover. 
 The beetles are rare, however, in spring, and the earliest record that 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 187 
 
 I have of actually finding the beetle is June 19. This may have been 
 and probably was one of the new brood, the adults of which are not 
 uncommon in the last week of June and become common by the middle 
 of July. They emerge over a considerable period, as our records 
 show, our dates of emergence being July 10 and 16, and August 20 and 
 25. The pupal period is two to three weeks. Thru July, Au- 
 gust, and September the beetles are common in the field, where we 
 have found them as late as October 8, 14, and 31, and November 25; 
 and indoors, they may be kept alive far into the winter and doubtless 
 until spring. Like the clover leaf-weevil, these other curculios feed 
 for a long time before mating and laying eggs. Dates of coition are 
 July 1 (exceptionally early) ; August 26, 30, and 31; September 1, 8, 
 10, 15, and 27; October 10, 18, and 25; and November 14. All these 
 records except those of September 8 and 10 were made in the insec- 
 tary (unheated but yet affording some protection from frost), and out- 
 of-doors mating and oviposition would not occur for quite so long a 
 time. Two to ten days elapse between coition and egg-laying. In 
 the field most of the eggs are laid in September. Indoors we have 
 found them to have been laid September 12, 14, 15, 19, 20, 22, 25, 26, 
 27, and 29; October 23 and 27; and November 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 14, 16, 
 17, and 23. For several years we have kept the beetles in abundance 
 under daily observation thruout their long lifetime, without getting 
 other dates of oviposition than these. A single female lays her eggs 
 at irregular intervals extending over several weeks. Thus a female 
 which copulated October 25 laid eggs October 27, November 2, 10, 17, 
 and 24. The egg period varies, even under conditions apparently the 
 same, and ranges from 13 to 32 days. Hatching occurred in the in- 
 sectary from October 17 to November 29, mostly in November, and 
 most of it before winter. Not a few eggs, however, failed to hatch in 
 autumn, and did not hatch the following spring, when they were 
 evidently dead. There remains, nevertheless, the possibility that some 
 eggs survive the winter. 
 
 The species winters chiefly as a young larva, but occasionally sur- 
 vives as a beetle in this region. 
 
 Webster dug up frozen clover sod on December 9, at Lafayette, 
 Ind., and found therein, after thawing it out, Sitones larvae, some of 
 them 1 mm. long, most of them under 2.5 mm. in length, and two 
 full grown and in earthen cells. He found also two beetles, but no 
 pupae. One of the adults was still alive February 18. April 13 he 
 found in the field, larvae (less numerous than in December, and in 
 about the same stage of growth), no pupae, and two beetles, which died 
 soon afterward. May 25 he obtained larvae (less numerous than in 
 April, but now nearly or quite full-grown) and pupae, and a single 
 adult, which died May 30. These beetles laid no eggs. June 14 he 
 found several adults. I regard these as belonging to the new brood. 
 
 Webster's account serves almost exactly for the species as it oc- 
 curs here in Urbana. He found, however, that eggs laid October 17 
 and 25 hatched in about 48 hours at a temperature of 65 F. a much 
 
188 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 shorter period than any that we have as yet found. He notes eggs as 
 being laid as soon as August 7, and copulation as occurring in the field 
 as late as November 12. 
 
 Habits. One or two beetles manage to live over winter, and even 
 to eat a little in early spring. Probably they issued late in the pre- 
 vious season and had enough vitality to carry them over to the next 
 season. I do not believe that such beetles lay any eggs in spring, how- 
 ever, in this locality. 
 
 When the larvae emerge from the egg in autumn they feed on 
 tender green tissue down where the stems join, avoiding the light and 
 biting out little crevices, in which they lie. As it gets colder, they 
 go down deeper and reach the roots. The larger larvae and the pupae 
 are found on the roots,, and part of the eggs are laid there, some of 
 the female beetles, after copulation, burrowing down along the roots. 
 Other females, in the breeding-cage, drop their eggs promiscuously. 
 
 The beetles, like the larvae, avoid bright sunlight. Most of them 
 feed by night. Some feed, to be sure, in the daytime when the sky is 
 overcast, or even in bright daylight on a shaded portion of a plant. 
 To find many of the beetles during the day, however, one must scrape 
 away the rubbish on the ground near clover plants that show the 
 characteristic work of the insect. The beetles when exposed to the 
 light are quick to recover their wits, and to hurry off to another shel- 
 tered situation. 
 
 The beetle when engaged in feeding stands astride upon the edge 
 of a leaflet and stays in the same spot, swinging its head and thorax 
 up and down as it eats, and biting out a rounded gap always of about 
 the same form and size. The beetles are alert when feeding, and drop 
 to the ground without hesitation when approached incautiously. In- 
 doors they will feed in the daytime if the light is not too strong. 
 
 Control. No enemies of this species have been found up to the 
 present. Should it become destructive it would be hard to deal with. 
 The cutting of the hay crop has little or no effect upon the larvae or 
 the beetles; the former continue to feed on the roots, and the latter 
 feed temporarily on the green stubble and attack the new leaves as 
 soon as they appear. In a field of red clover cut July 1, I found the 
 beetles and larvae common July 15 ; on clover cut July 23 the new 
 leaves showed considerable injury July 30. 
 
 Fortunately it is not necessary as yet to prescribe remedies for 
 the attacks of this weevil. 
 
 Other Species of Sitones. In Europe several species of Sitones 
 are injurious to clovers and allied plants. In America we have at least 
 four of the European species, namely, fiavescens, tibialis, hispidulus, 
 and lineellus. Tibialis is of no economic importance here. Hispidu- 
 lus, according to Schwarz, is a recent importation. It was first no- 
 ticed in 1876 in New Jersey, and subsequently in New York, Mary- 
 land, and Pennsylvania. The species is injurious in the old country 
 and may become a pest here. Schwarz found it to be abundant in 
 1889 in Washington, D. C., feeding on red clover. 
 
1909] 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 
 
 189 
 
 Lineellus is another potential pest, having injured clover and 
 alfalfa in Europe, tho it is not common here as yet. In Urbana, it 
 occurs occasionally in red clover fields, and the beetle eats the leaves 
 of that plant. A female taken November 26, 1907, by Mr. R. D. 
 Glasgow, a student at the University of Illinois, was kept alive on 
 clover leaves for a long time, under daily observation, and laid 
 eggs, eight being found November 27, and 10 on November 30. These 
 are oval, pale translucent yellow when laid, becoming jet-black; sur- 
 face minutely granulate; length, 0.5 mm.; breadth, 0.38 mm. Five of 
 the eggs found November 27, and laid not before November 26, 
 hatched December 16. The larva at hatching is white, stout, and 
 footless, with a black head, and its length is 0.82 mm. The body is 
 wrinkled to such an extent as to obscure the segmentation. The larva 
 is like that of flavescens, 
 and bends the head and 
 thorax over in the same 
 manner. These larvae 
 fed readi)y on red clover, 
 digging into the bases of 
 roots or stems. 
 
 To these few but new 
 notes on the life history 
 is added a sketch of the 
 
 newly born larva Of line- FIG. 32. Larva of Sitones lineellus at hatching. 
 
 Greatl y enlarged. 
 
 (Fig. 32). 
 
 Sitones flavescens All. 
 
 1887. Webster, F. M. Rep. [U. S.] Comm. Agr., 1886, pp. 580- 
 582. 
 
 1890. Schwarz, E. A. Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington, Vol. L, pp. 
 
 248-250. 
 
 1891. O shorn, H., and Gossard, H. A. Bull. No. 14, Iowa Agr. 
 
 Exper. Sta., pp. 177, 178. 
 
 1896. Xambeu. Mceurs et Metam. d'Insectes, Mem. 5, pp. 130- 
 133; Extr., Ann. Soc. Linn. Lyon, Vol. XLIIL, pp. 
 152-155. 
 
 CLOVER-ROOT MEALY BUG 
 
 Pseudococcus trifolii Forbes 
 (Coccus trifolii, Dactylopius trifolii) 
 
 This root-feeding mealy bug must in future be counted among the 
 insects that kill clover plants. Its capacity in this respect has been 
 overlooked, few entomologists having paid any attention to this incon- 
 spicuous subterranean species. 
 
 The insect occurs near the crown of the plant, as a plump oval 
 sluggish mealy bug, with more or less of a white coating. It sucks 
 the sap of ihe root by means of a minute beak. Legs and antennae 
 
190 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 are present, but are very small. Almost always the bugs are found in 
 groups composed of individuals of various sizes, the largest being 2.5 
 mm. in length. Usually, also, these mealy bugs are accompanied by 
 ants. 
 
 As yet we know of the presence of this species in New York, 
 Delaware, Illinois, Michigan, Iowa, and Kentucky only, but may 
 safely assume that it occurs in many other states. 
 
 This coccid is common on both red and white clover, and has 
 been reported from the sugar-beet by R. H. Pettit. 
 
 Tho these mealy bugs may be found in moderate numbers on the 
 roots of plants that appear to be healthy, the easiest way to find them 
 is to examine clover plants that are more or less wilted. Unaided by 
 other insects, the mealy bug often kills the clover plant. At first a few 
 leaves droop; then as these wilt and die other leaves droop, until 
 finally all the leaves are dead. No new leaves come forth. With 
 sufficient rain, however, the plant revives if not too far gone. On the 
 other hand, drought intensifies the effect of this sap-sucking insect. 
 Furthermore, the plant may suffer at the same time from the root- 
 borer, the leaf-weevil or the clover-louse, or from disease, old age, 
 poor soil, overpasturage, etc. 
 
 A certain proportion of the larvae go from the roots to the leaves 
 to feed, and may cause the leaves to turn yellow and to die. 
 
 The fact that the injury from this insect is not wide-spread is ac- 
 counted for by the feeble ability of the wingless females to go from 
 one place to another, and the habit of the somewhat more active larvae 
 to stay on the same plant. I have never found the species on first- 
 year red clover, tho its occasional occurrence on such clover might be 
 expected ; the spread of the insect is very gradual ; second-year clover 
 is affected in a sporadic way, except in a few localities where the in- 
 sect has obtained a foothold; and the worst injury is done to clover, 
 either volunteer or cultivated, that has run for more than two years. 
 
 Stages. The winter female was described by Forbes as follows : 
 "The body is elliptical, broadly and equally rounded at both ends, 
 nearly circular in transverse vertical section, distinctly segmented ; 
 surface covered with waxy bloom, smooth except for a few small 
 hairs at the anal extremity. Feet, eyes, and antennae minute. The 
 body is .11 of an inch long, a little more than half as wide, and a little 
 less than half as deep ; the abdomen decidedly shorter than the head 
 and thorax; the antennas .006 of an inch long, their length less than 
 the distance between their bases, obscurely seven-jointed [Fig. 33, a] ; 
 the first joint as wide as long; the second a little shorter and much 
 narrower than the first; the third and fourth a little smaller than the 
 second and not distinctly divided; the fifth and sixth distinct, equal 
 in length, and about equal to the first; the seventh long, cylindrical, 
 equal to the two preceding, obtusely pointed at tip. Entire antenna 
 minutely sparsely hairy under a high power. Eyes simple, consisting 
 of a single ocellus apd a black speck on the side of the head, directly 
 behind the antenna, the third joint of which will about reach them. 
 
1909] 
 
 THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 
 
 191 
 
 "Legs .01 of an inch in length, each reaching about one half way 
 to its fellow of the opposite side. Tarsus one-jointed, as long as the 
 tibia, tapering regularly, terminating in a single stout curved claw; 
 tibia and femur of about equal length ; trochanter as long as the coxa. 
 Legs very minutely sparsely hairy throughout. Rostrum very minute, in 
 the form of a thick tubercle projecting downwards in front of the 
 bases of the anterior legs, scarcely longer than wide, about half the 
 length of the femur." 
 
 I may add, after a study of the types, that the bristle of each 
 caudal tubercle (anal lobe) is subtended by a pair of conical projec- 
 tions (Fig. 34, a) ; the anal ring bears six long bristles; the tarsal 
 digitules are four in number and knobbed, as in Figure 35 ; and the 
 claw bears no teeth. The largest of the types is 2.5 mm. in length. 
 
 FIG. 33. Antennae of Pseudococcus trifolii: a, winter female; b, summer female; 
 c, larva. Greatly enlarged. 
 
 The summer female has been described by G. C. Davis and by R. 
 H. Pettit. The latter author writes: "The adult female measures a 
 little more than two millimeters in length, is reddish brown in color, 
 covered with a coating of waxy or mealy secretion. The legs are dirty 
 yellow in color. From the sides project 15 to 17 (usually 17) waxy 
 processes, forming a fringe around the body in the usual manner, 
 with the shortest filaments near the head, and those near the tail con- 
 siderably longer, sometimes one third as long as the body. The anten- 
 nae [Fig. 33, b] are eight-jointed; joint one is swollen, as broad as 
 long; two and three are subequal, each about as long as one; four,, 
 five, six and seven subequal, a little over half as long as two or three; 
 eight usually a little longer than five and six joined. There is consid- 
 erable variation in four, it is sometimes smaller than five, six or 
 seven, and sometimes slightly larger. The legs are dirty yellow, in 
 length the tarsus of hind leg is slightly more than half the tibia, which 
 about equals the femur. Digitules four; the two superior long and 
 slender, the two inferior shorter and more stout. (The digitules were 
 
192 
 
 BULLETIN No. 134 
 
 [April, 
 
 not distinct, but appeared as described.) Anal tubercles [Fig. 34, b] 
 not prominent, with a mass of small glandular spots, and bearing one 
 
 long hair, with some- 
 times several smaller 
 ones. Among the gland- 
 
 u ^ ar s P ots are pl ace( i two 
 conical projections or 
 processes on each tuber- 
 cle. These processes are 
 from two to three times 
 as long as broad at the 
 base. Derm dotted with 
 small round glandular 
 , spots. Back, near the 
 
 t> caudal margin, spotted 
 
 with larger round gland- 
 
 FiG. 34. Caudal region of Pseudococcus trifolii: a, win- 
 ter female; b, summer female. Greatly enlarged. 
 
 FIG. 35. Foot of Pseudococcus 
 trifolii. Greatly enlarged. 
 
 ular spots." Digitules and claws as described and figured by the 
 writer. 
 
 The larvae derived from the winter females are from 0.69 mm. to 
 0.78 mm. long and half as broad as long at birth, and are elliptical 
 and flat, looking much like scale insects. The antennae are six-seg- 
 mented (Fig. 33, c). The minute structures of the caudal region are 
 essentially like those of the adult females, as in Figure 34. 
 
 The male, which G. C. Davis described, is a minute two-winged 
 insect, with two long white tail-filaments, two pairs of eyes, delicate 
 milky-white wings, and the body thinly covered with a white powder. 
 The head, thorax, and first two antennal segments are of a deeper red 
 than the abdomen, legs, and remaining antennal segments. The eyes 
 are dark reddish brown. A mouth is not evident. 
 
 The egg is elongate oval, 0.34 mm. long and 0.17 mm. broad, 
 translucent orange-yellow at first, becoming brownish yellow later, 
 and with a smooth surface. The egg-mass is surrounded by the cot- 
 tony secretion of the mother. 
 
 The winter females that I examined all had seven antennal seg- 
 ments ; the grown larvae, six ; the full-grown summer females, eight ; 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 193 
 
 partly grown larvae show the stages of transition from six to eight 
 segments. In young larvae the division between segments two and 
 three is frequently obscure; in the large females the suture between 
 segments two and three, or three and four, is obscure. 
 
 Mr. Pettit, who studied summer females, intimated that the win- 
 ter specimens from which the original description was made were 
 male pupae. A study of the types, however, has shown me that they 
 are females, some of them being full grown, tho they resemble the 
 male pupae to the extent of having only seven antennal segments. 
 
 The necessity for using the name Pseudococcus for the genus 
 formerly called Dactylopius has been explained by Cockerell (Ann. 
 Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 7, Vol. IX., 1902, pp. 453, 454). 
 
 Life History. The first account of this coccid was given by Dr. 
 Forbes, who found the species on the roots of white clover May 3, 
 at Normal, 111. He found that the coccids "were protected by a 
 small yellow ant, Lasius ilavus, in whose nests they occurred, and 
 were carried away by them like plant-lice when the nest was exposed." 
 
 The general course of the life history has been made known by 
 G. C. Davis from his studies in Michigan. He found the coccids 
 abundant in clover fields April 27, and attended by Lasius niger. 
 When the nests of the ant were opened, the ants carried away these 
 coccids to another location. These were winter females. Davis put 
 some of them on potted clover and obtained young, the first appear- 
 ing May 15; these "gathered under the mother bug or collected in 
 the flocculent mass back of her that she had secreted while producing 
 them. They were of a light, translucent flesh-color, and much flatter 
 than the mother." 
 
 The oviparous female makes a nest of waxy threads and places 
 therein 75 to 300 eggs. "At first she is large and plump, but, as 
 the pile of eggs increases, she decreases in size until at last there is 
 nothing left of her but a little dry wrinkled piece of lifeless skin, and 
 a mass of eggs back of her that will measure two or three times as 
 much as she did a short time before. The time required for the eggs 
 to hatch, and the young mealy bugs to reach maturity, is only about 
 six or seven weeks." 
 
 The mealy bugs, tho numerous in the latter part of summer, dis- 
 appear in the fall, according to Davis, who failed to find them in any 
 stage October 15 where only a few weeks before they had been plen- 
 tiful. He suggested that they had changed to the winter form and 
 had been carried off by the ants. 
 
 Davis found also that the male, when about half or a third the 
 size of the full-grown female, crawls up to some part of the plant 
 above ground, spins a fluffy cocoon, and comes out, in less than a 
 week, as a winged adult. 
 
 In Urbana, the winter females of various sizes occur on the roots 
 of clover, attended by ants, in early spring. Our earliest dates are 
 March 24 and 26, but the females could doubtless be found thruout 
 
194 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 the winter. Small winter females taken March 28 and placed on the 
 roots of potted clover thrived until June 13, then disappeared. 
 
 Of the young brought forth on the roots by winter females, some 
 stay on the roots, but multitudes at once climb the stem of the plant 
 and fasten themselves by the beak to the under sides of the leaves. 
 These oval, flat, green, scalelike larvae may stay on the leaves for a 
 month or a little longer, growing meanwhile, or may go to the ground 
 sooner than that. One larva taken in the field May 25 and transferred 
 to potted clover stayed on the leaves until June 5, then disappeared, 
 to reappear June 9 down on the stem near the ground ; there it re- 
 mained until June 27, when it moulted ; July 5 it had disappeared for 
 good. 
 
 The young larvae on the leaves I found to be common June 24, 
 July 5, and July 8; those of the first two dates were newly born and 
 had not moulted. Larvae on leaves June 24 were transferred to the 
 roots July 30. where they thrived thruout August. 
 
 These individuals above ground wander about as they get older, 
 and at length go to the ground, some dropping off the plant, perhaps 
 by accident, while others creep down the stem to the roots. This 
 migratory habit of the larvae and their development on the leaves 
 have not heretofore been noted apparently. Very likely it will be 
 found that these aerial females are fertilized by the winged males. 
 
 While these individuals are feeding on the leaves there are others 
 of all sizes feeding in groups on the roots; in fact, the root-feeding 
 forms can probably be found every day in the year. The number of 
 generations has not been made out. 
 
 No eggs have been found in spring, and in our experience they 
 are not laid until late in the season. Our dates for oviposition in root- 
 cages are August 31, September 1, 2, 3, 5, and October 31. We 
 have taken eggs in the field August 31 and September 15 and 27. 
 The eggs always hatched before winter, the egg period being either 9 
 or 10 days in September, and 19 days for the eggs laid October 31. 
 The dates of hatching that we have noted are September 1, 2, 5, 10, 
 11, 12, 15, 18, 29, and November 19. The young from these eggs we 
 have carried far into the winter on clover roots, and regard them as 
 being the winter females, which are to attain their full growth in 
 spring. ' 
 
 Habits. The summer females wander about considerably on the 
 roots and often go above ground, to resume feeding at the base of the 
 plant in some crevice protected from the light, where they often lay 
 eggs. 
 
 As met with in the field, this mealy bug is almost always accom- 
 panied by ants, which have made their nest about the roots of the 
 clover plant. The species of ants found here, in this relation, are 
 Lasius flavus DeG., as mentioned by Forbes, and three other common 
 species : Lasius niger americanus Mayr, Lasius inter jectus Mayr, and 
 Myrmica scabrinodis lobicornis Nyl. 
 
1909] THE INSECT PESTS OF CLOVER AND ALFALFA 195 
 
 This coccid can get along very well without the ants, however 
 unlike the corn root-louse. In a root-cage the ants sometimes desert 
 the coccids, but the latter continue to feed and to produce eggs and 
 young as tho nothing had happened. In this instance the ants derive 
 most of the benefit from the partnership. When an ant finds one of 
 these mealy bugs on the ground or on the base of a plant, the ant 
 picks it up in its jaws, carries it down under ground, and deposits it 
 somewhere on the roots, usually not far from the base. If there are 
 eggs with the female, the ants carry these down also and put them on 
 rootlets. 
 
 When these coccids with ants and their cocoons are put on the 
 surface of the soil in a root-cage, the ants begin by burrowing down 
 along the roots. Then they carry down the coccids and the cocoons. 
 The former they place on the roots, but the latter they carry down 
 deeper to special chambers. If there are eggs of the coccid, the ants 
 show many attentions to them touching them often with the tips of 
 the antennae, carrying them from place to place, and often cleaning 
 them with the mouth in short, treating them as they do their own 
 eggs. The coccids are left much to themselves, but occasionally an 
 ant may be seen eating the white waxy secretion of the body of the 
 female. Mr. E. O. G. Kelly says that this secretion is eaten only 
 when it is newly made and fresh. Much of it is left by the ants and 
 is used by the female to cover her eggs. 
 
 In the field the coccid is now and then seen above ground at the 
 base of a plant when no ants are present. Occasionally, also, the 
 coccids are found working on the roots without ants, there being 
 either no sign of ants or else a nest that appears to be deserted. 
 
 This coccid spreads very slowly, as has been said. Newly born 
 larvse climb the stem to the leaves, but seem not to leave the plant to 
 any great extent, tho a few may be found on such neighboring plants 
 as are easily accessible. The summer females frequently go above 
 ground and wander about a little, tho they are sluggish. Probably the 
 species is spread by ants faster and farther than by any other means. 
 
 No natural enemies of this mealy bug are as yet known. 
 
 Up to the present the species has been of only minor economic 
 importance. 
 
 Pseudococcus trifolii Forbes. 
 
 1885. Forbes, S. A. Fourteenth Rep. State Ent. 111., pp. 72, 73. 
 1890. Carman, H Second Rep. Ky. Agr. Exper. Sta., 1889, 
 
 pp. 19, 20. 
 1894. Davis, G. C Insect Life, Vol. VII., pp. 171-173. 
 
 Davis, G. C. Bull. No. 116, Mich. Agr. Exper. Sta., pp. 
 
 56-60. 
 
 1899. Pettit, R. H. Can. Ent., Vol. XXXI., pp. 279, 280. 
 1902. Pettit, R. H. Bull. No. 200, Mich. Agr. Exper. Sta., pp. 
 
 193, 194. 
 
196 BULLETIN No. 134 [April, 
 
 LITERATURE 
 
 GENERAL ARTICLES 
 
 1881. Lintner, J. A. The Insects of the Clover Plant. Fortieth 
 
 Ann. Rep. N. Y. State Agr. Soc., 1880, pp. 10-26. Sep- 
 arate, pp. 1-17. 
 
 1882. Saunders, W. Insects Injurious to Clover. Ann. Rep. Ent. 
 
 Soc. Ontario, 1881, pp. 37^8. 
 
 1894. Davis, G. C Insects of the Clover Field. Bull. No. 116, Mich. 
 Agr. Exper. Sta., pp. 41-64. 
 
 1899. Hunter, W. D. A Preliminary Report on Insect Enemies of 
 Clover and Alfalfa. Ann. Rep. Neb. State Bd. Agr., 1898, 
 pp. 239-285. 
 
 1902. Sanderson, E. D. Insects Injurious to Qover. Insects Inju- 
 rious to Staple Crops, pp. 172-187. 
 
 LISTS OF SPECIES 
 
 1881. Lintner, J. A. Fortieth Ann. Rep. N. Y. State Agr. Soc., 1880, 
 
 pp. 13-15. Separate, pp. 4-6. 
 1889. Weed, C. M. Bull. No. 1, Tech. Sen, Vol. I., Ohio Agr. 
 
 Exper. Sta., pp. 17-46. 
 1896. Cook, A. J. W. J. Beal's Grasses of North America, Vol. I., 
 
 pp. 370-395. 
 1899, 1900. Hunter, W. D. Ann. Rep. Neb. State Bd. Agr., 1898, 
 
 pp. 240-247; 1899, p. 142. 
 
 EXPLANATION OF PLATE I. 
 
 FIG. 1 to 3. Clover Seed-midge, Dasyneura leguminicola: Fig. 1, larva, ventral 
 aspect ; 2, sternal spatula ; 3, female midge. All greatly enlarged. 
 
 FIG. 4 to 8. Clover Leaf-midge, Dasyneura trifolii : Fig. 4, galls on white clover, 
 also larvae and cocoons, natural size ; 5, eggs ; 6, larva, dorsal aspect ; 7, 
 sternal spatula ; 8, female midge. Fig. 5 to 8 are greatly enlarged. 
 
 FIG. 9 to 11. Clover Seed-caterpillar, Enarmonia interstinctana: Fig. 9, larva at 
 work in head of red clover, natural size; 10, larva, enlarged; 11, moth, 
 enlarged. 
 
II 
 
 7 
 
 
 
 
 PLATE I. 
 
1909] 
 
 197 
 
 PLATE II. 
 
 FIG. 1 to 4. Clover-louse, Macrosiphum pisi: Fig. 1, winged viviparous female; 2, wingless 
 viviparous female; 3, aphid attacked by fungus, Empusa aphidis; 4, empty skin after 
 emergence of parasite Aphidius. 
 
 FIG. 5 and 6. Clover Callipterus, C, trifolii: Fig. 5, wingless viviparous female; 6, winged 
 viviparous female. 
 
JV/2