PRAYER AS A POWER. BACCALAUREATE DISCOURSE, DELIVERED AT DARTMOUTH COLLEGE, JUNE 22, 1873. BY ASA D. SMITH, PRESIDENT. CONCORD, N. H. : PRINTED BY THE REPUBLICAN PRESS ASSOCIATION. 1873. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Alternates https://archive.org/details/prayeraspowerbacOOsmit DISCOURSE. GENESIS 32: 28. “For as a prince hast thou power with God and WITH MEN, AND HAST PREVAILED.” The spirit of prayer, in a qualified sense of the expression, may not inaptly be classed among the natural instincts. There is in the human soul, with all its pride and self-exaltation, a deep and ineradica- ble sense of dependence. We are neither self-made, we feel, nor self-sustained. We lean perpetually on props without us. In our blindness and weakness, and in the insufficiency of all earthly aids and re- sources, we turn, by a resistless inward prompting, to a power above us. The idea of God, if it be not innate, is at least most natural — of a God who can and will help us, and whose ear is open to our cry. So prayer has a place in all religions. There is not a mythology but embraces it ; there is not a creed, either of Christian or non-Christian lands, but gives it warrant and prominence. Nay, there is scarce a human being, especially where the light of revelation 4 shines, who does not, after some form or manner, at times if not habitually, take the attitude of a sup- pliant. This normal tendency of our being is well set forth by Mrs. Barbauld. "If prayer,” she says, "were not enjoined to the perfection, it would be per- mitted to the weakness of our nature. We should be betrayed into it if we thought it sin ; and pious ejaculations would escape our lips, though we were obliged to preface them with — 6 God forgive me for praying.’ ” But man, in his fallen estate, is a bundle of contra- dictions ; and so, in this relation, as in many others, there is often a lurking, if not an outspoken skepti- cism. " They say, How doth God know, and is there knowledge with the Most High?” And "what profit shall we have if we pray unto him ? ” It is the ten- dency of modern infidelity to eliminate all the great personalities from religion, and to substitute for them unintelligent, impassive forces. It either takes from us wholly a personal God, or the privilege, at least, of communion with him. And "science, falsely so called,” lends to the doubter her glass and her cruci- ble. In all the potencies she recognizes, prayer has no place. It may be a harmless and pleasant employ- ment — a profitable exercise to the suppliant himself. But beyond that, she sees no fruit of it. Sad, indeed, are these questionings in one view, but in another we rejoice in them. The recent discussions have turned 5 t the thought of all Christendom to this great subject. The truth in regard to it has been unfolded as never before ; and it will be more and more eclaircized. God will be more fully revealed to men, and men will be brought nearer to the divine Fatherhood. As presented in the text — one of the most remarkable in the Word of God — and as commended, especially, to those who are just beginning the great battle of life, it will not be found, surely, an inappropriate or unprofitable subject. This passage has reference to the great supplicatory struggle of the patriarch Jacob ■ — that wondrous night-scene, when “ there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day.” With- out entering into the particulars of the inspired nar- rative, it will suffice to say, that, as well in its unique symbolism as its literal statements, it naturally sug- gests as our theme, Prayer as a Power. It is a power, I remark first, following the order of the text, with God . It is so, not because of any might or worthiness in us, but of his gracious ordina- tion. He has said , 66 Ask, and ye shall receive.” And this is repeated and reiterated, in a thousand forms and relations, from the beginning of the Bible to its close. Prayer is not only set forth as a privilege, but enjoined as a duty. And it is urged upon us by an infinite variety of motives, now drawn from the sterner attributes of God, and now from the milder. It is so presented, that we must needs take the 6 simplest view of it. It is in literal truthfulness he speaks, when he calls himself the hearer and answerer of prayer. Otherwise to judge is to make the whole drift of the scriptures, in this relation, a mockery and a lie. We are to come to our Heavenly Father as children to an earthly; we are to ask as they ask, and receive as they receive. To conceive of it as only a spiritual gymnastic, putting the sup- pliant in a good mood, but having no further issue, is to make it little more than a vain show, and the promises that authorize it a pretentious illusion. Nay, it would be hard, in this view, to save it from con- tempt. Think of an earthly father directing and encouraging his children to ask favors of him, and then saying, “ I bade you ask, with no thought of giving, but only of the good the asking would do you. I deemed it a profitable mental and moral dis- cipline.” Under such conditions, how soon would all prayer cease — nay, all reverence. As to the blessings to be secured, the range is vast. That it includes spiritual mercies, few who believe in prayer at all are disposed to doubt. Some, indeed, limit its efficacy to these — as to the pardon of sin, to the joy of God’s salvation, to the cleansing of the heart, to the wisdom we lack, and to the influences of God’s Spirit generally. Of these, as subjects and issues of prayer, the Bible makes emphatic mention. But it mentions, also, temporal benefits. There is 7 scarce a good pertaining to the present life but it particularly names, either as a thing to be prayed for, or which prayer has secured. I need not remind you how the sick have been healed, prison gates have been opened, armies have been put to flight, the heavens have given rain, and even, as in the case of Daniel, the secrets of Providence have been unlocked. Our Heavenly Father has indeed put into the hands, of his children, so to speak, a blank petition, to be filled up at their pleasure. “ Be careful for nothing ; but in everything, by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known unto God.” “ In everything” — blessed amplitude of grace ! We may bring to the mercy-seat our minor as well as our major troubles. Whatever is a burden to us, whether from its own weight, or from our weakness, it is our privilege to cast upon the great Burden- bearer. In this respect as in others, “ to him no high, no low, no great, no small.” Nor does the thought of God’s care for the lesser matters, as for the falling spar- row and for the hairs of our heads, detract at all from his general providence. It was a fine saying of Ralph Waldo Emerson concerning Froude, that he “is able to see and say wholes, and to see and say particulars.” There was a certain divinity of his genius in this regard. So, on an infinitely broader scale, God knows how to harmonize, in his providence, wholes with par- ticulars, and particulars with each other. “Providence 8 is making a great stir for you,” it was remarked once, with a slight tinge of sarcasm, to a man who had been devoutly recounting God’s gracious order- ings of his private affairs. “Yes, for me,” the reply was, “but for others as well, and in the self-same events.” 11 In human works, though labored on with pain, A thousand movements scarce one purpose gain ; In God’s, one single can its end produce, Which serves to second, too, some other use.” He can so correlate the diverse and multitudinous facts of earth’s history, that the gracious answer to prayer in a single case shall affect not the recipient alone, but thousands of his fellow men — nay, all, it may be. Like the little pebble cast into the lake, it may send circling waves of influence to the farthest shore of being. As in the material world, according to the fancy of some, the vibrations caused by the human voice never cease, so, in a spiritual sense, the atmos- phere about us may be stirred, at this very moment, by utterances of supplication from the earliest ages. We may well pause and ask here, however — especially in view of the recent questionings of sci- ence — whether, as touching the power of prayer, there is no qualification or limitation. May we hope to receive, literally and exactly, whatever we ask? An inquiry this of great moment, as it stands related to fanaticism on the one hand, and to skepticism on 9 the other. Our reply to it will be brief, but frank and exhaustive. We shall contemplate therein not miraculous interferences, such as pertained, for im- portant purposes, to bygone ages, but such answers to prayer as may be looked for now. And we shall take for our guide, as the only final authority, the Word of God. Prayer, to be prevalent, we say, then, in the first place, must be uttered in faith. “He that cometh to God, must believe that he is, and that he is a reward- er of them that diligently seek him.” Where Christ is known, to say the least, and not to touch on the possibilities of heathendom, he must be believed in ; for “ he that honoreth not the Son, honoreth not the Father which hath sent him.” We must pray, too, in Christ’s name — virtually, if not formally ; for he is the “one Mediator between God and men.” “No man,” he says, “ cometh unto the Father but by me.” Praying thus, we say, in the second place, whatever is particularly and positively promised, we shall surely receive. As, in the case of an earthly father, there may be some requests concerning which he has given unequivocal pre-intimations, so that they may be uttered with no shadow of uncertainty, so is it with our Heavenly Father. He has promised the Holy Spirit to those who ask him ; he has promised wis- dom, also, and other particular spiritual blessings. He has promised that he will give to his Son the 10 heathen for his inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for his possession. He has not, indeed, indicated the ways and forms in which these blessings shall come ; a the times” and “ the seasons” he “ hath put in his own power.” But that prayer will secure them, he has pledged his word — more abiding than the earth on which we tread, or the heavens that bend over us. As to things not particularly promised, of which the number is vast, we have only to cast ourselves on his general benignity. We may well be encouraged by it, written as it is all over the uni- verse, illustrated as it is on every page of the Bible. Yet “we are but of yesterday, and know nothing.” What we ask in our blindness, we might depre- cate as granted. Well says the great dramatist : “ We, ignorant of ourselves, Beg often our own harms, which the wise powers Deny us for our good ; so find we profit By losing of our prayers.” Where no specific promise guides us, while we have the priceless privilege of spreading all our wants be- fore God, we have only to leave them all with him, saying, with our Great Examplar, even in the Geth- semanes of our history, “ Not my will, but thine be done.” To all this I must add, that prayer is a power only as all appropriate means are used. The fable of Hercules and the wagoner does but adumbrate Christian truth. God honors as truly, though not in 11 precisely the same way, his natural as his moral laws. It is for our weal that the activities required by them should be ever kept in play. Even in the case of miracles, what stress has been laid on human instru- mentality. The rod of Moses must be stretched forth ; the rock must be smitten ; Jericho must be compassed ; Elijah must stretch himself upon the dead child. In the wonders wrought by our Lord, though the potency inhered in his mere word, how often is the use of means commended to us. He touches the eyes that are to be opened, or he anoints them with clay. He puts his fingers into the ears that are to be unstopped ; he touches the tongue that is to be unloosed, and the leper that is to be cleansed. To complete his cure, the blind man must wash in the pool of Siioam. Much more are means to be used when they are not symbols merely, but veritable second causes. The spirit of prayer is the spirit, also, of accordant action. He who prays only, neglecting appropriate instrumentalities, is either a fanatic, mistaking God’s methods, or a pretender, rest- ing in the mere verbiage of supplication. Keeping in view the qualifications and limitations thus succinctly specified, we are prepared now to aver, that real prayer is always answered in some way. It is, in other words, always a power with God. So is it, as we have said, when we have a specific promise to plead. So, too, when we cast ourselves, 12 simply, on the divine Fatherhood. If we ask him for bread, he will not give us a stone. It may not be the bread, either in substance or in shape, that our fond fancy has conceived ; that, he may see, will not be best for us. It may not be, to his all-discerning eye, our fittest soul-food ; it would harm, on the whole, instead of helping us. And so he may deny it, that he may give us something better. Just as an earthly father might withhold from his little child the edge-tool that would be perilous, or the viand that would work evil, only that he may show his love by some wiser gift. In this view, we judge, we have a key to all those passages, save only such as relate to miracles, which assure us that faith will secure what- ever it asks. Faith never dictates. Faith asks sub- missively. Faith means always, “ This, if it please thee ; or something else, if, in thy sight, that is better. Give me, for my seeming needs, if it may be so, the meat which perisheth ; but give me, at least, that meat ‘ which endure th unto everlasting life.’” Faith regards all temporal good as but the shadow of the spiritual and the eternal ; and it deems its prayer for the former answered, if, instead thereof, the latter is granted. Even spiritual blessings come to the sup- pliant often in disguise. They may be as God’s good angels about him, while he detects not their footfall or the rustle of their wings. They may be within the heart’s portal, when there seems for the moment 13 to be but loneliness there. Beautifully is this set forth by an oriental poet, — albeit of another faith than ours : ‘ ‘ Allah ! was all night long the cry of one oppressed with care, Till softened was his heart, and sweet became his lips with prayer. Then near the subtle tempter stole, and spake, Fond babbler, cease, . For not one Here am I has God e’er sent to give thee peace. With sorrow sank the suppliant’s heart, and all his senses fled ; But at night’s noon, Elias came, and gently spake and said, What ails thee now, my child, and whence art thou afraid to pray, And why thy former love dost thou repent ? Declare and say. Ah ! cries he, Never once to me spake God, Here am /, son ! Cast off, methinks I am, and warned far from his gracious throne. To whom Elias, Hear, my son ! the word from God I bear ; Go tell, he said, yon mourner, sunk in sorrow and despair, Each Lord ', appear , thy lips pronounce, contains my Here am I ; A special messenger I send beneath thine every sigh. Thy love is but a girdle of the love I bear to thee, And sleeping in thy Come , 0 Lord , there lies Here, son , from me.” It is in place here, and will meet the demands of our subject, to glance at the views of one of the most eminent of our modern scientists. I refer to Professor John Tyndall. I utter his name — as it sug- gests his own remarkable history, and as it stands related to the progress of human knowledge — with a feeling of profound admiration. A man who, with a diligence that never tires, a will that quails not before the most appalling obstacles, a keenness of insight that stops not short of the deepest mysteries of nature, has made his way from obscurity to his present proud position • a man whose genius has illumined so broad and diversified a field of science, reaching from 14 the cold glaciers of the Alps, through cloud and rain and river and rivulet, down to fhe central fires — yea, to the innermost secret of those fires ; is worthy to be heard with respectful consideration. Chistian charity would fain have for him no scornful words. It would ill comport with his own emphatic utterances to deem him an atheist; we are slow even to pro- nounce him an infidel. We are willing to believe that he has been too severely judged by many. He discards not prayer ; he thinks " not otherwise than solemnly,” he declares, “ of the feeling that prompts it.” He denies not even — after the puerile fashion of the Westminster Review and its coadjutors — the pos- sibility of miracles. “ There is no inherent unreason- ableness,” he says, “in the act of prayer” — in that act, he means, as it respects even the physical sphere. 66 The theory,” he adds, “ that the system of nature is under the control of a Being who changes phenom- ena in compliance with the prayers of men, is, in my opinion, a perfectly legitimate one.” He only asks that this theory be verified ; and it is in relation, almost solely, to the test he proposes, that we take exception to his views. He errs, we say in the first place, when he repre- sents us as holding that prayer is, in certain relations, “a form of physical energy.” We hold no such thing. We never identify it with a law of nature; we regard it rather as a purely spiritual force, issuing from the 15 depths of the free spirit in man, and reaching and moving the Infinite Spirit. Mr. Tyndall seems, in- deed, to be not quite sure of his own statement; for he adds, “ or as the equivalent of such energy.” Be it so, in some sense. Admit that in some cases, like results come of both. Are equivalents in this regard always identical ? Do they belong to the same cate- gory? Are they subject to the same laws? A kind word may soothe as well as an anodyne, but is it framed, therefore, by the pharmacopoeia ? A sermon may induce sleep as well as the juice of the poppy, but would you test it, therefore, by the chemist’s re- agents ? A physical force is, ex vi termini , in nature — part and parcel of it ; prayer and the divine power it invokes, — in other words, the power of prayer, — is without and above nature. Nature is affected by both, but what folly to confound them. Prayer is no more “ a form of physical energy ” than is the cry of a suffering child, or the pity it awakens in a father’s heart. Erring at this point, it is not strange that he errs as touching the test of prayer. How inept and im- possible, clearly, is the verification he proposes. This is evident from the nature and conditions, as we have stated them, of all prevalent supplication. It is to be offered in faith ; but in what laboratory of man — by what analysis, either of science or philosophy— is that to be surely detected ? The power must be present, 16 of course, or you have no right to count on the effect. To ordinary prayer for physical benefits, we look in vain, moreover, for specific promises. They are all of a general character. We commit our case, as we have said, to the infinite benignity of our Heavenly Father, and to his unerring wisdom. But who can say, with certainty, what will be best for us, or what he can con- sistently do ? “Who, by searching, can find out God ?” That various forms of natural good, such as rain from heaven and the restoration of health, are sometimes granted in answer to our petitions, we have reason, both on experimental and historical grounds, to be- lieve ; and what is more, this belief is warranted by the infallible word of God. In that we rest. But that prayer, in particular instances, may be subjected to some crucial test — as if the mere form of words were of itself a power, working like the forces of nature, certainly, constantly, and invariably — is so near to an absurdity, that we cannot but wonder at its finding a lodgment in a brain like Mr. Tyndall’s. We have doubters, however, respecting the power of prayer, as we intimated at the outset, of a very different character. Their difficulties are of a deeper and broader sort. They plant themselves on the im- mutability of nature, so far as her essential laws and ongoings are concerned. Law reigns, they tell us, in all the material creation, and law is uniform. It brooks not interference. Its maintenance is essential 17 to the harmony of the universe — nay, to its stability. If it is liable to be disturbed, at one point and another, by varying modes and measures of spiritual influence, not only may the equilibrium of things be destroyed, the whole system may topple into confusion. What- ever link prayer may strike from the chain of causa- tion, “ tenth or ten thousandth, breaks the chain alike” While confidence in the future is lost, the stimulus to present action is weakened. Nay, as the mind and heart of God are affected, even his immutability is brought into question. Such, in its length and breadth, is the case against us. We might meet it, if we chose, on the simple ground of faith. If we could frame not the slightest conjecture as to the way in which the reign of law and the prevalence of prayer could be reconciled, the unchangeableness of God and his readiness to hear his children, yet on his testimony we should be sure that they could be reconciled. I would not say with the old divine, “ Credo, quia impossibile ; ” but I would say, I believe because God hath spoken. Like the little child, who paused in his evening devotions, as his eyelids grew heavy with sleep, and faintly mur- mured, “ God knows the rest,” so would I say, at the end of all my own poor wisdom. Yet we are not straitened as to arguments wherewith to vindicate the ways and the utterances of the Most High. As to the difficulties growing out of the reign of 18 law, they pertain no more, be it observed, to the ma- terial than to the spiritual sphere. For hath not mind its laws as well as matter ? The law of liberty in the soul, indeed, or the freedom of the will* would seem to present a special difficulty. The objection in hand, pressed to its full issue, would leave no place for prayer — a result avowedly contemplated by some who urge it. I may say further, that as to the appre- hended derangement of nature by the interposition of a divine force, our fears may well be allayed by the fact that we have the analogue of that interposi- tion, as Mr. Tyndall admits, in “ the ordinary action of man upon earth.” If his free will may enter harmlessly, and as a distinct but real efficiency, into the complicated tissue of physical causation, why may not God’s ? And as to the doctrine of the divine immutability, it is put in no peril. We essay not the metaphysics of God’s nature. That there is to him, as divines have said, “ one eternal now,” is doubtless in some sense true. Yet there is a sense, that to which, from the limitations of our being, we must be mainly confined, in which there is succession with him — succession of thoughts, feelings, and deeds. Changeless in his essence and attributes, and so in the principles of his government, he yet varies, as occasions arise, in the application of those principles. Yesterday we sinned, and he frowned upon us; to-day we are penitent, and we share his smile. Yes- 19 terday we were prayerless, and he withheld priceless blessings ; to-day we kneel in suppliance, and from a father’s yearning heart those blessings come down. It is only thus he is true to himself, and so, in the best sense, the unchangeable God. With these preliminary remarks, we pass to the two main theories, by either or both of which, it is believed, the power of prayer may be reconciled with the essential stability of nature. The first has been called the theory of preestablished harmony. It is so called because it recognizes the predetermined con- currence of prayer and the need it meets. A cer- tain exigency, and the cry for help it elicits, are foreseen by God ; waiving all speculation about an eternal present, they were foreseen — or foreordained, if you please so to say — before the world was. And the aid implored is also foreordained — not as a mira- cle, but as the resultant of undisturbed natural forces. A line of causation is established, natural causation, running through the ages, and so timed and adjusted that it brings to the suppliant, in his extremity, just the blessing he asks. At the beginning of Daniel’s supplication 66 the commandment went forth,” and the angel Gabriel, “ being caused to fly swiftly,” touched him before it was ended. At an earlier command- ment, in the view we now present, and over a longer track, God’s messenger comes, but with a concurrence not less exact and felicitous. Is this harder for God, 20 think you, than for the cunning weaver so to dispose the threads of his variegated web that they shall cross each other at precisely the right points, each making its contribution to the preconceived figure ? There is, according to this theory, no suspension of law, no modification of it. It reigns as ever • and yet God reigns, and graciously answers prayer. It happened, not long ago, that on one of the rail- roads of New England, a road with a single track, two trains had started in opposite directions ; and they had started at such times, the superintendent learned, that unless they were arrested a collision was inevitable. But there was no way of arresting them. They had both left the only telegraph stations avail- able. As the sole remaining resource, the superintend- ent telegraphed to one of those stations, directing that a swift car be dispatched immediately — a car which he was assured would reach the point of collision at just the time when, under the pressure of the foreseen calamity, the cry for help would be heard. In this predetermined concurrence, we have an imperfect illustration of what we may conceive to be God’s way of answering prayer. There is a second theory, however, which owes its most brilliant exposition to the genius of Chalmers. I may call it the theory of occult influence. It em- braces no miracle, in the proper sense of the term ; for a miracle is not only “ an effect in nature above 21 nature/’ it is a sensible effect. It is something which, perceived, becomes a wonder. Nor does it contemplate, strictly speaking, a suspension of the physical forces — not even an apprehensible counteraction or modifica- tion of them. “Prayer,” says Chalmers, “may obtain its fulfilment without any visible reversal of the con- stancies of nature, provided its first effect is upon some latent and interior spring of the mechanism, and not among its palpable evolutions. Let but the touch of communication between the Deity and his works, when he goes forth to meet the desire of any of his creatures, be behind or underneath that surface which marks and measures off the farthest verge of man’s possible discovery — and then may there be many a special request which receives as special an accom- plishment, yet without disturbance to those wonted successions which either the eye of man or his nicest instruments of observation shall enable him to ascer- tain.” And he goes on to illustrate this view with reference to prayer for a prosperous voyage or for an abundant harvest, answered, possibly, by some divine touch, far down in the unsounded and unsoundable depths of meteorology ; and to prayer for the recov- ery of health, responded to, not by any derangement of the visible ongoing of nature, but by some occult influence in the unexplored recesses of the animal economy. “ It is thence,” he says, “ God may answer prayer ; and however proud science shall despise the 22 affirmation, there is nought in all the laws and se- quences that she has ever ascertained, by which she can disprove it.” I met lately with an illustration of this view — given as such by an eminent divine — drawn from a familiar department of human mechanism. In one of the in- land cities of New York, beside the river on which it is built, there is a steam engine in a small building, by means of which, as it is kept going day and night, the inhabitants are supplied with water. The machinery is so arranged that the demand of the town acts ordi- narily as a governor, the engine moving with greater or less rapidity, according as the water is taken off in greater or less measure. But there is a special provi- sion, a reserved force, for a special exigency. When a fire occurs, by means of wires accessible from with- out, an alarm bell rings in the engine-room ; and the engineer, unseen by the people of the imperilled city, and by methods which they, probably, would but im- perfectly understand, gears on some curious extra machinery, by means of which the mains are charged to their fullest capacity, and such an amount of pres- sure is brought to bear upon them, that the water is sent to the tops of the loftiest buildings. We have here, in the leading particulars — we say not in all — a shadowing forth of the theory in hand. In the ordi- nary machinery — in the larger and smaller pipes, in faucet and hose, and in the maintenance of the gen- 23 eral law, supply answering to demand — we have an illustration of the visible constancies and regularities of nature. In the tinkling of the bell, as, rung by some faithful watcher, it falls on a single ear, we have the voice of prayer. In the heart and the hand that respond, and the interposing force, unseen but effec- tive, we have the Infinite Architect and Engineer answering, out of the veiled recesses of the physical sphere, the cry of the earnest suppliant. What is so clearly possible in the material world is even more conceivable in the world of mind. By facts, experienced or observed, its likelihood, to say the least, is often suggested. It is related of an eminent naval officer, that, as the vessel he com- manded was once crossing the ocean, its course brought him in sight of the Island of Ascension, an island at that time uninhabited, and seldom visited by any ship. It met his eye but as a speck on the horizon ; yet, strange to say, he was seized with a strong desire to move towards it. He knew how singular such a wish would appear to his crew, and he struggled against it ; but it grew more and more intense, and, as they were fast leaving the island behind them, he ordered his lieutenant to prepare to “put about ship” and steer for Ascension. The lieutenant ventured respectfully to remonstrate. He urged the loss of time a change in their course would occasion ; and, as the men were just then engaged, 24 he pleaded for, at least, a little delay. His argu- ments, however, availed nothing ; they rather in- creased the desire that had mastered the captain, and he gave, at once, the word of command. Though in the faces of all the officers there was an expression of wonder and even of blame, the order was obeyed, and the prow was turned towards the uninteresting little island. All eyes and glasses were immediately fixed upon it, and soon something of an unusual sort was perceived upon the shore. "It is white — it is a flag — it must be a signal ! ” were the cries which broke at intervals from the excited crew. As they neared the land, a touching spectacle met their view. They found that sixteen men, wrecked on that coast many days before, and suffering the extremity of hunger, had set up the observed signal, though almost without hope of relief. They were taken on board, and the ship that had come thus as God’s ministering angel, went on its way. That cries to heaven for help had risen from some of those shipwrecked men, is, to say the least, highly probable, and that prayers had been offered for them by devout friends at home. Is it irrational to say that those prayers were answered ? It may have been in the first of the methods we have indicated. There may have been only the operation of natural causes, the chain thereof reach- ing down from the eternal purpose to the moment 25 of need. That remarkable desire of the captain may have come of the normal workings of mind and heart ; the reign of law in both may have been un- broken, unmodified, unsupplemented. We know too little of the mysteries of thought and feeling to aver the contrary. Yet this very ignorance favors rather than forbids the theory we are now consider- ing. How very possible is it - — according to the seeming of the case, as it would strike most minds — that, far down in the arcana of the soul, there was some special pressure of the divine finger, reaching we know not what cell of memory, stirring we say not what wing of fancy, thrilling we aver not what chords of association, opening we affirm not what founts of feeling, — yet giving such ultimate direction to the will, as wrought salvation for the perishing ones. God is not straitened as touching his access to the mind, or his secret operations there. He has glorious options as to his way of working. And apart from all arrogant and presumptuous dogmatism, and without discarding the great stabilities of nature, it is not difficult to show how, as touching both the physical and the spiritual, prayer may be a power with him. We pass now, in the second place, to contemplate prayer, according to the suggestion of the text, as a power with men . In view of what has been said under the first head, no amplitude of argument or illustra- 26 tion is needed here. That which moves the hand that moves the universe must needs have power in inferior directions. It gives to the suppliant, we may say, first, power with other mm. This, both as it exerts a certain direct influence, and as it secures, in various forms, divine aid. It has been beautifully said, “ The nearest way to any human heart is round by heaven.” So was it in the case of Jacob. There was an influ- ence from above, we may presume, upon the mind of his exasperated brother — “ harder to be won,” it had seemed, 66 than the bars of a castle.” There was a wisdom of precaution and of conciliation on the patri- arch’s part — there was a power of suasion in word and look — born, we cannot doubt, of that night of wrestling. You remember the famous saying of Queen Mary, that she feared the prayers of John Knox more than a host of armed men. She had many reasons for fearing. Not only is God with a praying man, his omniscience and omnipotence work ing for him, — he is himself a power. He is Virgil’s good man before the “ignobile vulgus,” only on a higher plane and a broader scale. His face shines as did that of Moses. Like Stephen’s, it is as “ the face of an angel • ” and his words come to men with more than angelic authority — it is as if God were working and speaking through him. There is involved in all this, moreover, what may be called the reflex influence of prayer. If it be real 27 prayer, from a believing heart and an earnest pur- pose, it is mightily retroactive ; it is a power with the suppliant's own soul , and so, as has been intimated, a greater outgoing force. Here, as in other relations, we “give out ourselves, ourselves take back again.” Nay, we take back with an increment. There are potent echoes of our supplication ; it resounds from the heavenly hills, with a sweet and sanctifying influ- ence, through the innermost recesses of our being. We draw near to God; we commune with infinite excellence ; and so, by a law of our spiritual nature, we receive a transforming and elevating influence. We grow into the likeness of the object we contemplate. Even the intellectual being is exalted. “An hour of solitude,” says Mr. Coleridge, “passed in sincere and earnest prayer, or the conflict with and conquest over a single passion, or ‘ subtle bosom sin/ will teach us more of thought, will more effectually awaken the faculty and form the habit of reflection, than a year’s study in the schools without them.” Hence the old maxim, “ Bene orasse, est bene studuisse .” It is related of a student here, in years long gone by — a man as distinguished for diligence and success in scholarly pursuits as for fidelity in his religious duties, that he was observed, one morning, to make a strangely im- perfect recitation. “ Pray, how did it happen ? ” said a friend. “To tell you the truth,” was his answer, “ I had neglected my morning devotions.” There was a 28 sound philosophy in that reply. There is not a men- tal faculty to which prayer gives not a quickening touch. For it is the voice of faith, as we have seen ; and it is well said by the profound writer just quoted, “Never yet did there exist a full faith in the Divine Word, (by whom light , as well as immortality, was brought into the world,) which did not expand the intellect while it purified the heart; which did not multiply the aims and objects of the understand- ing, while it fixed and simplified those of the desires and passions” Prayer helps the memory even. It gives keenness to perception, and balance to the judg- ment, and a loftier flight to the imagination. It imparts a serene and commanding self-possession. And, what is more, there is not a Christian grace, be it love, joy, peace, gentleness, meekness, or holy bold- ness, over which the breath of supplication comes not as that of spring over the nascent buds and flowers : “ Lord, what a change within us one short hour Spent in thy presence will avail to make ! What heavy burdens from our bosoms take ! What parched grounds refresh as with a shower ! We kneel, and all around us seems to lower ; We rise, and all, the distant and the near, Stands forth in sunny outline, brave and clear ; We kneel, how weak! We rise, how full of power! ” It is through the channel of prayer, above all oth- ers, that the soul is “ filled with all the fulness of God.” 29 Such is prayer as a power- — as a power with God, with our fellow-men, and with ourselves. How do its achievements, as seen in the light of our subject, dwarf all others. We speak of the marvels of mod- ern science, and we render due praise to its successful votaries. But whabgreater wonders are here. Prayer is the telegraphic wire that stretches beyond the stars. It is the spectroscopic power, unfolding to us the mys- teries of the Sun of Righteousness. It is the mighty solvent, that melts away the great mountains of diffi- culty. It is the divine alchemy, that turns the baser metals of earthly toil and care and sorrow into heav- en’s own gold. What an ineffable dignity does it impart. How far above the mere kings of men are those who, in this exalted service, are “ kings and priests unto God.” No loftier plaudit ever fell upon the ears of a mortal than that which Jacob heard, as the day was breaking upon him— that plaudit which heaven grant it may be ours to hear— “As a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed.” Young Gentlemen of the Graduating Class: As we meet you in these Sabbath solemnities for the last time, very pleasant to us are the memories of your college course. I speak not for myself alone, but for the whole circle of your teachers. And very deep is the interest with which we contemplate your 30 future. As you stand now on the verge of the great field of action, you have a new sense of its responsi- bilities, and of the importance of ample preparation for them. You will need for the work before you a various equipment. The highest mental discipline will be called for, and the largest possible acquisition. You will welcome, too, all fitting opportunities, facili- ties, and helps. But our chief solicitude is, that you may have the best spiritual endowments ; that under whatever name you may choose to serve God — a matter, you will bear us witness, which we have ever held as of comparatively little moment — you may all be men of prayer. So, in the highest sense, as to all the great interests, both of time and eternity, you shall be men of power. There are tender recollections awakened by the scenes of to-day, which specially commend to you this high attainment. There are graves which, to your open ear, are eloquent of it. You think of Huntley, and Bichardson, and Smith, and Foster, and Clark — beloved classmates, with you but as yester- day, with hearts as buoyant and promise as fair as yours — now numbered with the dead ! I seem to hear their voices from the spirit land, saying, “ What- ever else ye fail of, be men of prayer.” While yet the dew of youth is upon you, you may need, as they did, that only key to the pearly gate. Should long life be yours, yet as cares accumulate, as bur- 31 dens press upon you, as fierce conflicts arise, as sorrows are multiplied, as temptations cluster about you, you will need, to your latest breath, this divine resource. You will need it in whatever lowly walk, and on whatever shining height. I thank God, as I speak, for the example of one — that honored son of Dartmouth, mourned of late by the whole nation — whose life was a noteworthy illustration of the theme before us. The late Chief Justice Chase, I joy to believe, was a man of prayer. He bowed the knee, we are told, at the family altar. He communed with God, we doubt not, in the secret place. And the normal issue of that communion was his whole grand career. It is pleasant to remember, that it was in these classic halls, as we have reason to believe, he began his life of devotion. I was affected by the statement, as I lately read it, that, for many hours of the week preceding his decease, he employed his colored servant in reading to him from the recently published sermons of his own College President, the late Dr. Bennet Tyler. How, as page after page was turned, was he carried back, doubtless, - to the scenes of his undergraduate life. He was a boy again. He was within these walls as of old. His classmates were about him. The preacher’s noble form was before him ; and the living voice, so especially per- suasive then, as tradition has it, to a life of faith and prayer, was sounding again in his ears and thrilling 32 his heart. What fitness was there and what surges- tiveness — what a memento of the power he had wield- ed — in the presence and the ministry of that repre- sentative of the down-trodden race for whom it had been his joy to dare and to do. And how are we pointed to the chief source of that power, as his life of prayer comes thus to its natural and beautiful close. What a lesson have we in this elder brother, for these younger sons of Dartmouth. Be ye “ follow- ers of them who through faith and patience inherit the promises.” Be ye men of prayer ; — and so, when the last of earth shall come to you, you shall leave blessed memories behind you, and the voice of sup- plication shall pass into heaven’s anthem of praise. \ I A POSITIVE FAITH. A antalaureatq Sermon, PREACHED AT DARTMOUTH COLLEGE, BY SAMUEL COLCORD BARTLETT, PRESIDENT OF THE COLLEGE, JUNE 24th, 1883. HANOVER, N. H. PRINTED AT THE DARTMOUTH PRESS, 1883. SERMON. 2 Cor. iv: 13. “We having the same spirit of faith, accord- ing AS IT IS WRITTEN, I BELIEVED, AND THEREFORE HAVE I SPOKEN ; WE ALSO BELIEVE, AND THEREFORE SPEAK.” Here are two voices, but one sentiment. “ It is written,” — in the Psalms. It is repeated in the epistle. In the midst of conscious weakness and well-nigh universal treachery, the sweet singer of Israel, centuries before, had stayed himself by faith on God : “ I believed.” And now the great apostle, looking out, backward and forward and around, on the enormous trials and dangers enveloping his whole pathway, rests his undaunted hope and courage on “ the same spirit of faith ” in God : “ We also believe.” Two dispensations here coalesce. The apostle and the psalmist join hands across the ages, and together they proclaim in our ears this great lesson of a cheerful and success- ful life, THE DUTY, THE VALUE AND THE POWER OF A POSITIVE FAITH. The distinction between a matter of science and a matter of faith has been stated thus : the one is a certitude admitting of verification, the other a certitude not admitting of verifica- tion, — although both rest on satisfactory proof. The distinction may be admitted, — so far at least as verification to another is concerned. It is, for example, a matter of science that the dis- tance accomplished by a falling body varies as the square of the time ; for it not only rests on evidence, but can at any time be tested. So with the physical properties of a metal or a gas. But it is matter of faith that God intelligently governs the uni- verse. For though the evidence seems to me irrefragable, I can not verify it, at least to another, as I can the law of falling bodies. Again, that the properties ascribed to the metal and the gas are actual qualities of an external object, and not modifications of my mind or senses, is matter of belief, or in a broad sense, faith. 4 For however invincible the conviction to me, I can not verify it by experiment to the questioner. In its most general sense, therefore, faith has a wide range, — from the trust we repose in the truthful working of our human faculties up to the surrender of mind and heart to the claims and authority of Jesus Christ. This last is the culmination of all faith, being the supreme move- ment of the human soul, in its highest humanity, towards the Supreme object of the Universe. It is pre-eminently Faith, Christian Faith. And this will be the aim and goal of my dis- cussion, while yet I do not exclude from thought all those sub- ordinate exhibitions of belief, which lie in the same direction, though in a different plane. For there is a believing spirit, ready to find and receive all truth, and to embrace the highest. And there is a spirit of unbelief, doubt, cavil, which notably grows with the greatness of the theme. Now the world is so adjusted in its chief arrangements as’ to make the believing spirit both a privilege and a duty, a kind of moral necessity. Man, the head of the creation, was made to walk by faith, and not like the animal, only by sense. It is the prerogative of humanity as rational ; it is the necessity of reason as human. So are we trained from the cradle to the grave. Faith is both the law and the instinct of childhood. All early knowledge is belief ; all early inclination is to trust. Parental authority is the child’s law and his gospel, parental care is his life : “ My mother said it ” ; “ my father will do it ”. Then follows the in- evitable reign of the book and the teacher : “ Ipse dixit ”. The time comes when the man sets up for himself, and for what he calls original research. Is it history ? Here his knowledge is testimony or inference, except what is conjecture. Is it science ? His scientific knowledge is chiefly, a vast mosaic of other men’s researches. Is it the field of demonstration ? Every strict dem- onstration is but the conclusion from an assumption, and every stage of the process necessitates an absolute trust in the truth and trustiness of the memory. In all personal investigation the man falls'back on an unverifiable confidence in his faculties, and an unprovable persuasion that the unknown is like the known. Throughout his business life, however much he may have been deceived and defrauded, he caqnot for an hour escape the ne- 5 cessity of confiding in his fellow-men. Every dollar of the Rothschilds’ fortune is secure only through the integrity of a multitude of men scattered over the world. All business invest ment is a trust in the future and often in the antipodes. The traveller from Boston to San Francisco, blindly commits himself by day and by night to the skill and fidelity of a great army of engineers, brakemen, switch -tenders, wheel-hammerers and sec- tion hands, makers of time-tables and time-keepers, mechanics of wheels and axles and bolts, and manufacturers of forty mill- ions of rails, any one of whom or of which, if untrue, might land him, not in San Francisco, but in eternity. At home he trusts his life and property all the day and all the night to the hourly in- tegrity of his many neighbors. Or if once in a life-time he appeal from the conduct of some one of them, it is still to the supposed uprightness of courts and truthfulness of witnesses. Some little village lies nestled away among the hills. It is thronged with students. A small cluster of residents, men, women and children, are in the power of some hundreds of young men in the vigor of youthful strength and of youthful im- pulse. Do they lie down at night in perpetual anxiety lest their property be destroyed, their houses burned, and themselves abused and outraged ? No, they sleep all the more peacefully, knowing that those young men will on the morrow, if need be, exert their utmost strength to save their homes from the devour- ing flames, and even give of their scanty means to relieve the sufferers by fire.* Such is the settled and accepted condition of life. With whatever qualifications, we believe the past, we trust the future, we confide in the present. We fling ourselves upon the waves and the winds. We cast our hopes boldly upon the seasons of the year and the ancient promise. We put ourselves in the hands of natural law, of brute force, and of men, individually and by multitudes, — the men we have seen, and the men we never saw, nor shall see. This vast network of trust and confi- dence is interwoven with the woof of our life, and entwined with the fibres of our being. Our life, and every part of it, like some *An allusion to what had taken place in the village of Hanover, a few weeks previously. 6 Suspension Bridge, swings by a cable in the air, with Niagara rolling beneath ; and we ride boldly on. The attempt to evade it or escape by doubt or suspicion, is fruitless. It is “as when one fled from a lion and a bear met him.” Abbas Pasha built him a high watch-tower and kept swift dromedaries always sad- dled for flight ; but it could not have saved him from the hand of the assassin. We are also inclined, trained and compelled to live by faith in regard to things less tangible, and more supersensual. Men naturally accept implicitly their intuitions, and are dominated by their religious convictions. When one asked stout old Samuel J ohn- son how he would deal with Berkeley’s idealism, “ Sir,” said he, “ I refute it thus ” — and he brought his foot vigorously against a stone. Neither Johnson nor mankind can be reasoned out of a primary belief, ultimate but unprovable. The agnosticism which would shut out from human purview all that is beyond and above, is “ as much at war with human experience, as with reason and revelation.” In token of profound belief in a future life, the old Egyptian embalmed his dead and hewed out his vast tombs on the banks of the Nile ; and the Indian on the shores of Lake Superior placed food and weapons, apparel and ornaments in the grave. And so resolute has been the faith of the human race in superior beings, that “ they will worship a stock or a stone sooner than have no God ”, — will bow their very intellect before the demands of their spirit. Much more will they cleave to the dictates of their moral nature against all puzzling shows of logical acuteness. It is useless for the metaphysician, whether he be a Tappan or even an Edwards, to say, “ unless you accept this or that theory of the will, you can not hold to human free- dom.” I answer him, “ My knowledge of my freedom is older, deeper, clearer than your speculations. They may — or may not — go to the winds ; my freedom stands on a rock. I know it with- out you or in spite of you.” Vainly would Clifford or Tyndall parade their theory of necessitated action, and therefore no proper responsibility. We answer, “ Your brain-spinning can no more withstand the instincts and necessities of humanity than any other spider’s web. Responsibility is the ultimate fact and settled law of humanity, so all-embracing and inevitable that he who denies it in word will sternly hold all other men responsible 7 to him in fact, and will himself be held forever responsible by ‘ all other men — and by his Maker too ” The believing spirit is the normal, rational state, the unbelieving is abnormal, unnatural and irrational. In every line of thought and action, doubts will occur and perplexities arise. But we solve them, or act in spite of them. We see the objections, and in view of the proofs we overrule them. We recognize the difficulties, and under the exigency of life we over-ride them. The most cautious inquiry must point to some settled result. A state of chronic indecision is intolerable, whether in the business man, the scholar, the physician, the law- yer, the general or the theologian. Your business man sees what and how to do. Your scholar decides, or he is no scholar. Your physician diagnoses and prescribes, or you drop him. Your judge finds out the law and applies it. Your general plans, often in a flash, and by the flash, and fights. McClellan doubted and dawdled ; Grant believed and struck. While the Reverend Syd- ney Smith questioned whether missions in India could succeed or would comport with the safety of the British empire, Carey, Marshman and Ward, his “ consecrated cobblers ”, were in India leading the vanguard of the great host of Christian converts, to the saving of souls and perhaps of the Indian empire. There is no good reason why the same principle that prevails everwhere should halt upon the threshold of the very highest sphere, religion. But there is the best of reasons to the contrary, in the inconceivable magnitude of the interests. Unsettlement here, in the main issues and fundamental truths, instead of being the mark of strength, must, on every analogy, be regarded as the token of weakness. It is but mental and moral flabbiness. And though, not seldom, good men attain to bright hope through long distressing doubts, — and we rejoice in the issue, — is it at all needful to desire the process — much less to call it the necessary or even natural way? Is it the only or the best way to confirmed temperance through inebriety, or to health though dangerous dis- ease ? I believe it to be our privilege to reach the full assurance of faith, without the long conflict with darkness. But whether or not we pass by that way, it is our privilege and our duty not to have our home in the dark valley but to come out and dwell in the clear light. 8 For the main aspects of our spiritual relationships are plain and simple : an intellect looking, a heart yearning, a conscience commanding, towards the One Supreme Excellence ; that glori- ous One shadowing forth his eternal power and Godhead in the visible things of creation, openly declaring himself in the Divine and matchless Word, unveiling himself tenderly and intimately in that mighty Saviour whose historic coming revolutionized the world’s career, whose living power and presence are as manifest all over the world to-day as in Jerusalem eighteen centuries ago, and whose calm voice calls to every man, “ rise and follow me.” Surely the benign influence of the blessed sun is hardly more un- mistakable than of him who calls himself “ the light of the world.” It is inscribed in the volume of the book, on the human soul, in the Christian life, on all modern history. Open rejectors have often been, in their hour of candor, his strongest witnesses. How such men as Rousseau the profligate skeptic, Carlyle the rugged deist, Napoleon the heartless but lynx-eyed semi-pagan, Mill the hereditary unbeliever, Lecky the free-thinking historian, rise up to rebuke the Matthew Arnolds and their congeners for their shuf- fling evasions of Christ’s character, claims and religion. When a Christian clergyman writes of “ the Ten great Religions ” of which Christ’s is but one, he might well listen to the great Scotch- man, when he says, “ We often hear the Christian doctrine liken- ed to the Greek philosophy, and found on all hands in some measurable way superior to it. But the Christian doctrine is not superior or inferior or equal to any doctrine of Socrates or Thales, being of a totally different nature. He who compares it with such standards may well lament that the loftiest feeling hitherto vouchsafed to mankind is as yet hidden from his eyes.” To those who would patronize the Saviour as only the best of men, there comes the voice from St. Helena, “ Between him and whosoever else in the world, there is no possible term of com- parison. He is truly a being by himself. His truth and the his- tory of his life, the profundity of his doctrine, his gospel, his apparition, his empire, his march across the ages and the realms — everything is to me a prodigy, an insoluble mystery, a mystery which is there before my eyes, a mystery which I can neither deny nor explain. Here I see nothing human.” To those who push by his claims as some ideal or mythical creation, there comes, in 9 the posthumous Essays of John Mill, a voice from the grave, speaking thus : “ It is of no use to say that Christ as exhibited in the gospels is not historical and that we know not how much of what is admirable has been superadded by the tradition of his followers. Who among his disciples was capable of inventing the sayings ascribed to Jesus or of imagining the life and character revealed in the gospels ” ? To those who talk of a mere law of human progress comes the bold utterance of Lecky, “ It was re- served for Christianity to present to the world an ideal character which through all the changes of eighteen centuries has filled the hearts of men with an impassioned love, and has shown itself capable of acting on all ages, nations, temperaments and condi- tions ; and has exerted so deep an influence that it may be truly said, that the simple record of three short years of active life has done more to regenerate and soften mankind than all the disqui- sitions of the philosophers and all the exhortations of the moral- ists.” What a thorough-going testimony — and how strictly true ! Indeed faith in Christ and his religion is a certitude that may be said in our day to have risen in certain aspects to the level of knowledge, in the verification that is before and within us. A seemingly defenceless man once promised to conquer an opposing world by being miserably slain. “ And the mode of the accomplishment,” said the great captain, “ is more prodig- ious than the promise. In this conflict I see all the kings and forces of the earth arrayed on one side. On the other I see no army, but a mysterious energy, no rallying sign but a cross.” Yet by this sign it has gone forth to conquer. He who asks even for miracle has before him “ the perpetual miracle ” of the ever-liv- ing presence and power of Jesus Christ, in the progress of the faith and the government and growth of his church. Imagine, if you can, dead “ Caesar from his mausoleum ” guiding eternally the destinies of Rome ; or dead Alexander from the tombs of the Ptolemies leading his armies on to perpetual victory ; or dead Napoleon from beneath the splendid canopy of battle flags that overhang his coffin, and by some weird and “ midnight re- veille ”, gathering up again for an hour the relics of his vast hosts and the fragments of his mighty empire ! But the crucified Christ is to-day a living, reigning, conquering power on every continent of the globe. Here is your world wide, age-long miracle — gather- 10 ing within its divine sweep not alone slow transformations of great empires, but sudden revolutions of low savage races, and countless individual regenerations, from Paul and Augustine down to Guergis and Africaner. And, to complete the assurance and raise it in part to the very plane of conscious knowledge, the be- nign influence comes to a man’s own heart and life so unmistak- ably that he can say, “ Now I believe, not because of thy saying; for I have heard him myself and know that this is the Christ the Savior of the world.” He that ponders all this “ superhuman agency of Jesus Christ in history ” and in life, — and experiences it too — may well have positive convictions, even “the full assurance of faith.” He can say with stronger emphasis than did Carlyle, that “ the Chris- tian religion, once here, cannot again pass away.” It is here to stay, here to work, here to triumph. He has no apologies for it or any of its belongings, no fears for its fate. And joined with this grand central trust; there must be and there will, faith in the truth and the right, faith in virtue and in work, faith in woman and faith in good men, faith in every righteous cause and faith only in righteous means, faith in prayer and in providence, faith in progress and in ultimate success ; faith to labor and to wait ; faith to toil on in darkness and alone ; faith to struggle and silently endure ; faith to hold on. and hold out; faith even to sit still and see the salvation of our God. II. See now the value of a strong positive faith like this — its value, I mean, to its possessor. Its value is felt throughout its entire range, whether in whole or in part, and from the top to the bottom of the scale. It is a benign stimulus. The pursuit of a man’s life or his enterprise of the day should carry his interest, and his confidence that it is, for him and for the time, the sphere and the work. It makes cheerful toil, buoyant spirits. Men must believe in their callings, whatever they be, so long as they are honest. A true farmer should have as genuine an enthusiasm as a merchant or a lawyer. Shame on him who is ashamed. When the physician loses faith in medical science, let him depart. When the minister ceases to feel that his work is the noblest, he has a call to with- draw. The first Napoleon used often to say, “ when I was lieuten- ant.” When Carey in India sat as an honored guest at the Gov- ernor General’s table, and overheard a petty officer inquire, “ was not that man once a shoe maker ? ” “ No, sir”, said Carey, “only a cobbler.” But he knew he had cobbled well. If Irving and Prescott had no zeal for the law, they did well to look elsewhere. When Sterling and Emerson lost faith in the clerical function, nothing became them so well as the leaving of it. I do not for a moment concede, however, that a man can have a confidence only in some certain spheres and occupations. Much less would I countenance the not infrequent plea of the young student that he has no interest in certain branches of a well-bal- anced education, no drawing towards them ; therefore he should be released from them. Nay, but he is bound to have both faith and zeal for the things that stand approved by the best wisdom of the past and present ; bound, on that evidence to believe in his mathematics and his science, and especially in his classics as indispensable to the highest training ; and if he have no interest, to awaken one. If he is a true man he will. His antipathies betray his necessities. The principle, “ similia similibus curan- tur,” will never work here. The lacking interest must be roused by faith, — faith in his elders and his betters. A man is not to be tied up by his narrow and callow propensities. Good man- hood lies in the power to throw mind and heart and hand into this thing or that, as Divine Providence may call. And faith in the call shall change drudgery to delight. Another function of value is, that such strong positive con- victions give the steadiness of purpose which is a chief element in every high human career. Men live for the day. They see only what is just here. The young student has no controlling sense of the future, and therefore he trifles away the present on which it hangs. The young professional man cannot toil patient- ly till his opportunity comes ; and so, when it comes, it goes. Here and there the man of intense and masterful convictions la- bors and waits, and takes his prize. Sometimes against all probabilites — as when the young adventurer, D’lsraeli, struck for a hearing in Parliament and the Premiership of Britain. But it is with the fixedness of such convictions and with such consequent steadiness of purpose that the scholar, the artist, the discoverer, the professionalist, and above all, the Christian toiler, have achieved their highest successes. Heyne delving at his classics 12 with but two nights’ sleep a week ; Mendelssohn nine years per- fecting his Elijah ; Webster lavishing time and money on some blacksmith’s case for a fifteen dollar fee ; Schliemann, from the age of seven seeing the ruins of Troy beneath the dust of ages, and struggling towards it forty years ; Kepler willing to wait two hundred years, if need be, for the acceptance of his discoveries ; the Plymouth Pilgrims silently harboring “ a great hope and inward zeal of laying a foundation for the kingdom of Christ in these remote parts, though they should be but as stepping stones unto others for performing so great a work,” — these are the men. And naturally enough it is in the sphere of religion that faith, Christian faith, has shown its marvelous power of steady perseverance ; and the bright catalogue would contain volumes of names from Paul to Livingstone. Such men can work and pray — and wait. It is sad to hear the true cause of temperance pushed by false arguments. It was a pitiful thing that some of the men who a generation ago made valiant fight against American slavery, must needs grow so impatient as to wage war upon the Bible and the church, be- cause these were not fast enough for their fiery ardor. And most melancholy was it on the 4th of July 1842, to hear in the Method- ist church in Andover, Mass., William Lloyd Garrison even petulantly wish that the lightinings of heaven might blast Bunker Hill monument. But his voice is silent ; the Bible speaks ; the church lives ; the monument stands ; — and slavery is dead. Faith in God can use God’sappointed methods and await his time. It is for the want of clear convictions, alike high and dominant, worthy of being called faith, that so many a gifted man has proved a wretched failure. Benjamin Constant one of the brightest minds of France, yet avowedly without faith in virtue or honor, earned the name of “ Constant the in- constant,” made his life a wail, and his end a conscious abortion. The world is full of such failures, partial or total. While we recognize the brilliant achievments of such men as Poe, Byron, Burns, Mirabeau, we cannot forget how each of them burned out his life with passion and vice before he reached his proper prime ; and, strikingly enough, it is Carlyle who avers that the radical lack of Burns was “ religion,” and says of Byron 3 that “ Satan was the hero of his poetry and apparantly the model of his conduct.” See, once more, how the positive faith brings repose and quietude of spirit. Men rejoice to be well anchored. In pro- portion as doubts run deep and high, is the heavy ground-swell of unrest. Paradoxically but truly has the vacuum of the heart been called “ an aching void ”. And one might almost say, “ Great God ! I’d rather be A Pagan suckled in a creed outworn, So might I, standing on this pleasant lea, Have glimpses that would make me less forlorn ; Have sight of Proteus rising from the sea Or hear old Triton blow his wreathed horn.” Hume said he was “ appalled at the forlorn solitude in which he was placed by his philosophy.” Miss Martineau, while boast- ing of her “ freedom from old superstition ”, cannot but speak in the same breath, of “ all the peace and quiet of orthodoxy.” A late atheist writer* avowed the great “ pang ” with which he cut loose from the moorings of Christianity. Later still, Vernon Lee by the mouth of Vere,* confesses that his settled material- ism is “ bitter and abominable, arid and icy to our hearts.” And there are few sadder or more “ haggard ” things than the last days of John Sterling, when having once for all said, “Adieu, oh church, in God’s name adieu ”, three years later, in the last sta- ges of consumption, he wrote to his nearest friend — whom he would not see, — “ on higher matters there is nothing, to say. I tread the common road into the great darkness. Certainty, in- deed, I have none.” For when one who has deliberately parted with all the consoling hopes of the gospel, looks through the high cliffs that part this sea of life from the great unknown ocean of eternity, he may well sing with a deeper pathos than the poet’s, “ Break, break, break, At the foot of thy crags, O sea ! But the tender grace of a day that is dead Will never come back to me.” *Candid Examination of Theism. ^Contemporary Review, May 1883. 14 The firm and positive faith, rationally formed, carries rest. We see a semblance of it even in the “ Kismet ” of the Moslem, the “fortunes” of Caesar, and the “destiny” of Napoleon; but the reality in the “ good Providence ” of the trusting child of God. The sailors on the Mediterranean were amazed by John Howard’s perfect calmness under the pirate’s attack ; and equally amazing was the coolness with which at the end of the voyage he shut himself up in a plague hospital at Venice. It was on his high errand of mercy ; and the secret of his calmness may be read in his journal, “ Oh God, my heart is fixed, trusting in thee.” “ Where,” said the pope’s legate to Luther at the begin- ning of his stormy career, “ where will you find a resting-place”? “ Under Heaven,” said Martin Luther. From the vortex of the tempest in its fury, he exclaimed, “ Oh crafty Satan ! But Christ is abler than thou.” And two days before the end of all, he wrote, “ Grace and peace in the Lord, dear Catharine. I have one that takes care of me better than thou, or any of the angels could, one who is seated at the right hand of God Almighty.” He had marched through life to his own hymn, “ Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott.” In recent and peaceful times there have been few nobler exhibitions than the composure of Thomas Arnold, under the tremendous storm of public and private obloquy that for four years beat mercilessly around his head, till “ even his personal acquaintances,” says Dean Stanley “ began to look upon him with alarm, some dropped their intercourse altogether, hardly any were able fully to sympathize with him, and almost all re- monstrated. He himself was startled,” continues Stanley, “ but not moved.” He bore all in silence, adhered to his principles, and held on his way. The clue to his composure may be read in his journal, ten years later, written on that last night before his sudden death : “Above all, let me mind my own personal work — to keep myself pure and zealous, and believing .” And the issue of that personal work, the English world now knows by heart. Priceless is the value of such a faith in God and the right. III. A strong positive faith is the source of power. And here we must distinguish between a faith worthy to be so called, that is, a deep conviction having a high object and a 5 rational basis, on the one hand, and a mere blind determination, a wilful fixedness of purpose prompted by low aspirations, and founded on no true principle, it may be on positive wrong. There is hot seldom seen such a wilful purpose, and it has its transient power like the force of the bull or the bull-dog, when the one shuts his eyes and dashes on, and the other shuts his teeth and clings till death. Yet the bull-dog has but his day, and the bull in the arena is slain at last. Similar is the fate of the wilful and wrongful combination. Every “ ring ” breaks up at last. It fails to bind the right cause, or cripple the right man. In the long run, Cromwell and Wash- ington, Lincoln . and Gladstone are sure to win against their def aimers and assailants. Truth and faith and courage walk through unhurt. The nearest approach to the power of a worthy faith may be seen in the influence of the chief illusions of life, and the controlling force of its higher enterprises. Wealth on the brain binds a man, as Rothschild said he would bind his son, “ mind, soul, heart and body,” and wins it, if it can be won. So politics, fame, pleasure. Did the disillusioning process which comes at the end, come at the beginning, what a collapse would the world show. It is the strong conviction of the greatness and worth of science that has wrought such results, sending its Pliny into the deadly fumes of Vesuvius, and its Franklin to the fatal ice-cliffs of the North, keeping a Herschell and Darwin on perpetual watch upon the heavens or the earth, a Davy or a Pasteur in courses of life-long experiment. Hence the long patient struggles of the inventor, often in poverty ; hence the great achievements for the world’s benefit, amid discouragement, doubt and ridicule. This spirit has dredged the ocean, tracked the glacier, climbed Chimbo- razo, pierced the dark continent, and weighed the far-off planet. How has a sense of the grandeur of his sphere moved the hand and fired the heart of the great artist as he has said to himself, “ I paint for eternity.” The greatness of his country has loomed up on the sight of the patriot till he would die on the battle-field or pine in the hospital ; and America free and America freed is the double monument of that mighty conviction. i6 These things bear pondering. There are sermons in them — theologies. They point us upward to the higher faith — the high- est. For if allegiance to truth and right in their subordinate forms, as loyalty to science and to country, can work such achieve- ments, what should be the power of the supreme allegiance ? Accordingly the world has seen that the difference between a heart vitalized with a great faith in God, and a heart empty of all faith in God or goodness, is the difference between the green valley of the Nile and the desert through which it lies. What one grand achievement, what one great benefaction have all the blank doubt, skepticism or agnosticism since the world began, brought to the world ? Which of the myriad charities has it or- ganized and maintained ? What nation has it lifted ? What community has it purified ? What vicious circle has it reformed ? What one blasted character has it regenerated ? What soul has it raised to the heights of godlike magnanimity? Yea, what enduring monument of highest genius has it erected ? From nothing, nothing comes. Zero multiplied by millions, is zero still. Darkness can not give light. The vacuum of the heart is an exhausted receiver to the life. When Brutus could say at Philippi, “ Oh virtue, I have followed thee through life and found thee at last but a shade ”, let him fall on his sword. The best things of Paganism have been found where it ap- proached nearest the verities of true religion. The pyramids are perpetual monuments of a belief in immortality. The finest statuary, the noblest temples, the highest poetry, sprang from the time when the heavens were real to men. The greatest oration of Demosthenes derives its chief momentum from the almost Christian grandeur of its moral attitude. In the dark ages of the church, those splendid cathedrals and noble paintings embody the deep religious sentiment. And in modern times if it be true, as one said, that “ an institution is the lengthened shadow of some man, as the Reformation of Luther, Quakerism of Fox, Methodism of Wesley, Abolition of Wilberforce,” it is also true that the germ of the Institution was the burning faith of the man. Wilberforce speaks for them, one and all, when he wrote in his journal, “ God Almighty has set before me two great ob- jects, the suppression of the slave trade, and the reformation of i7 manners ”, and when he wrote to his sister, “ be the love of Christ our talisman.” Sometimes we can fix our eye on the time when the power of achievement for good entered the man, with the inflow of vital religion to his soul. There was a time when an indifferent and formal young preacher at Kilmany suddenly waked to the real meaning of Christ’s gospel, and the transformation was as complete as when some great magazine of combustibles re- ceives the torch. For the dry wooden mass kindled and blazed and glowed with a flame that sent its warmth through all Scot- land, and its light to India and the world. It was Thomas Chalmers regenerated, a true believer in Christ. The easy-going kirkmen said “ Chalmers is mad ; ” but it was with the same madness that had infected Paul before him, and the whole com- pany that under Christ have been revolutionizing the world. For the world itself, in its present attitude and outlook, with its missions and beneficences and mighty working forces for good, is but the Wren-like monument of such a faith. Men have be- lieved and therefore they spoke ; believed with all their being, and spoke with all their power, with tongue and pen and life. Their cause was as resistless as their faith was bright. They have labored while they lived, and conquered when they fell. For there was an invisible force which dungeons could not hold, sword and cannon could not kill, flames could not burn, nor waters drown. Borne on by such a faith as this — a faith which Christ’s gospel itself inspires and maintains — that gospel has made its way. Despised and persecuted by the despised race from which it sprung, it rose to life as the nation fell. Emerg- ing from its native home, it made for the great cities that hug the Mediterranean, the seats of power and centres of civilization. Without one mortal weapon of offense or defense, it boldly grappled with every wrong. It stood meekly unresisting when the Empire ten times in succession threw its huge weight upon It, and then rose from the crush unharmed. It in turn threw itself upon the Empire, mounted its throne, spread through and beyond its territory ; “ it gathered all genius and learning unto itself, and made the literature of the world its own ; it survived the inundation of the barbarian tribes and conquered the world once more by converting the conquerors to the faith ; it survived i8 he restoration of letters ” ; survived the corruptions of the church itself ; “ survived an age of free inquiry and skepticism, and has long stood its ground in the field of argument, com- manding the intelligent assent of the greatest minds that ever were ”, and outwardly controlling the great empires that now control the earth. And to-day it stands girded with youthful strength, waving the banner of the cross for a forward movement all along the line upon the strongest entrenchments of the pow- ers of darkness, hearkening to its Great Captain’s command, “ Go ye into all the world ”, and to his promise “ I am with you alway.” Young Gentlemen of the Graduating Classes : I invite you, and each of you, to join the goodly company of those who speak and act from profound and positive convic- tions, and especially upon the greatest issues. I invite you to go forth to your life work with fixed and well considered princi- ples, — principles worthy of the name, because they are thoroughly right and true and tried — principles in which you can put a con- fiding faith, and on which you can safely lay out, or lay down, your life. Choose a pursuit you believe in, and act out your belief. Honor it, and it will honor you. Prepare for it in quiet trust. In it do a man’s good work, believingly. Come out from the company of idlers and triflers and learn to labor and to wait. Learn that. great secret of success, to “be ready when the oppor- tunity comes.” Here is the sphere for a silent, patient faith. In whatever profession, be more than a professionalist : be also a true man, with profound and positive convictions on all high things, which no professional policy shall prevent your speaking out, if need be, “ in words as round and hard as can- non balls.” And, above all, let me invite you to ally yourself personally by a living faith to that one central Source of all high principle, holy motive, lofty aim and noble endeavor — to Him who stands out in his divine isolation as at once example, incentive, guide, helper and reward — Him who presents himself to you and the whole world saying, “ I am the way, the truth and the life ” — 9 Him who is riding forth conquering and to conquor till every eye shall see him move ; — to Him ally yourselves livingly and loving ly, and it shall be your privilege, your blessing and your power. The prayer of that greatest of geniuses, Michael Angelo, is none too lowly or too trustful for you : “ My unassisted heart is barren day That of its native self can nothing feed ; Of good and pious works thou art the seed, That quickens only where thou sayest it may ; Unless thou show to us thine own true way, No man can find it : Father ! thou must lead. Do thou then breathe those thoughts into my mind, By which such virtue in me may be bred That in thy holy footsteps I may tread : The fetters of my tongue do thou unbind, That I may have the power to sing of thee And sound thy praises everlastingly.”