LAWRENCE J. GUTTER Collection of Chicogoono THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO The University Library I I tljotfe Cfjicagoan* to tofjom an ounce of prebention is better tfjan a pounb of proclamation, this little booti ts bebi= cateb bp tfje autfjor. COPYRIGHTED 1916 BY HENRY BARRETT CHAMBERLIN Introduction IN PENNING these pages of Chicago's modern robber barons of the crime trusts, I confess to a motive beyond and above the making of a few dollars for myself. I would, so it please my readers, ride as a second Paul Revere. I would cry my warning through the midnight streets not midnight as to hour, but in their slumberous unconscious- ness and disregard of the army of crime that even now is planning an assault upon the citadel of law and order. "Awake, men of Chicago!" I would cry. "While you sleep, crime works. It is marshalling its regiments for the big battle. It has sworn to retrieve the last three years of loss. You had little, if any, part in inflicting those losses; crime counts upon your continued in- difference for its chance to spring once more into the saddle. Awake ! Awake! Awake! It is not unlikely that some of my readers may criticize this small book on the ground that it may become, in effect, a campaign docu- ment for Maclay Hoyne. If such criticism befall I shall not be dis- pleased. For it is near my heart that Hoyne be returned to office. I frankly espouse his cause for I regard him as the best state's attorney Cook County and Chicago ever had. As former editorial head of a Chicago newspaper, and in other capacities, I have had some special opportunities for seeing the inside of his work. It has been good, clear through. He has, in my estimation, done more to intimidate crime than any of his predecessors; has been the first, in fact, to bring the fear of the law home to the chieftains of crime. In addition to his astonishing array of convictions he has so systematized his work that the county jail and the dockets are in a less crowded condition now than at any time in the last twenty-four years. Moreover, though the earnings of the office have exceeded two, three or four times the earn- ings of his immediate predecessors, the receipts from fines, fees and forfeitures have, for the first time in the history of Cook County, been turned over to the county treasurer. Hoyne could have retained these funds but he did not. Hence, in sounding my Paul Revere, I find it MACLAY HOYNE States Attorney foj^the County of Cook Withdrawn Biblical Institute well within the purport of my message to add this sentence: "The first and best step the people can take in any campaign of prepared- ness against the hosts of crime is to organize for the retention of Maclay Hoyne as state's attorney." Modern crime, like modern business, tends toward centralization, organization and commercialization. Ours is a business nation. Our criminals apply business methods. They are the hardest criminals in the world to combat. No longer do we have to deal with the indi- vidual. The men and women of evil have formed trusts. In this book you will find some small account of the men and methods of ten of these outlaw organizations. Since Hoyne came into office he has, among many other activities, uncovered the arson trust and sent its leaders to prison ; exposed the secrets of the seers and routed the clairvoyant trust; annihilated the confidence game and wiretapping trust, and stamped out the pickpocket and horse-stealing trusts. Police protection was the one element essential to the existence of organized crime. The collusion between grafting police officials and the various crime trusts was fully exposed by Hoyne and the criminal police officials convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary. This not only destroyed the real cause of organized crime, but relieved the rank and file of the police force, recognized to be honest, from the menace of criminal control, and gave to individual policemen the chance of ,* honest service, free from suspicion of complicity in corruption. First among all the public prosecutors of the land, I would place Hoyne, of Cook County. He has conducted more successful prosecu- tions of crime than either former Governor Folk as district attorney of St. Louis or Governor Withman as district attorney of New York. He is honest, fearless and efficient. The forces of evil hate him. For at least a year they have been preparing to drive him out of office when his term is ended. They know that if they can get a weak man in his stead, they will be able to recover all the ground lost by them during his four years in office, and to strengthen and entrench themselves as never before. Hence it is that I am sounding my warning. HENRY BARRETT CHAMBERLIN. o Three four CHAPTER I Arson Trust In Which the Work of the Fire-Bugs Is Uncovered and Chicago Property Owners Saved Millions JOSEPH CLARKE, public insurance adjuster, looked appraisingly at the brothers, Paul and Edward Covitz, woolen merchants. He was not in doubt as to the object of their call. Like other adjusters in Chicago's arson trust, Clarke had found it necessary to meet the keen competition by putting on an outside man, a solicitor. This sales- man of fires had reported the Covitzs as bankrupt. "So you two want a fire?" asked Clarke. The brothers flinched. "Well," said Paul Covitz at length, "we want our place to go." Clarke laughed. "That's the regular way of putting it. I never knew one of you fellows yet who could say 'fire.' Either he wants his place to go, or he wants to 'sell out to the insurance company.' " The brothers laughed. "What kind of a fire do you want?" asked the adjuster. "A still, a blow-out, a closet fire, a flash?" The brothers looked puzzled. Clarke began to explain. "A -still," he said, "is a fire that isn't reported often doesn't even happen. Insurance companies frequently settle for fires of that kind." "Oh, we want a real fire," interrupted Edward Covitz. "Every- thing to burn everything." "Want to get out of your lease?" asked Clarke. "It's necessary to burn the roof off for that. We always make a point of the roof in a lease proposition." "It ain't exactly the lease," began Paul. "Ah, then woolens are going out of fashion?" smiled the adjuster. "It's always that way when feathers go out, then we have a crop of feather fires, and as for the petticoats when the tight skirts came in, they certainly did go up in smoke. Change of fashion and dull times both hit the insurance companies hard." The brothers inquired how a fire could be managed safely. Clarke explained. He was sorry the Covitz place was not heated by a stove; it was always safe to start the blaze where the heater might ' be blamed. He also suggested starting the fire in the store adjoining the Covitz store and letting it burn through, thus avoiding all chance of suspicion. But there was a fire wall. "Anyway," he concluded, "leave all that to me. I have the best torch in the business, John Danies. I had an awful fight to get him there's so much competition among adjusters." Five Clarke agreed to manage all the details fix the firm's books, check up the policies, get additional insurance and settle the loss. He explained that his organization included several houses that would send out worthless stocks of goods or false and padded inventories. As to the charge, that would be, for himself, ten per cent of the insurance collected, and another ten per cent for the torch. "But how can we get enough insurance to make it pay?" asked Paul Covitz. Clarke laughed. "Oh," he said, "the insurance companies will take anything. Why the official records in New York show that a guy recently got $127,000 insurance on a gas range, a cuspidor, two sixteen- cent curtains and a second-hand table all worth $3.44." When Danies arrived from New York, Clarke explained to him that the Covitz brothers wanted a nice job nothing to incriminate. The woolen merchants occupied the ground floor at 20 South Fifth Avenue. Danies went over to get the lay of the land. "I'm from the insurance underwriters," he explained to Paul Covitz. The Covitz were affable. They said they had heard good reports of Danies' work. They showed him around the place. "Remember," said Edward, "the ceiling must come down. Everything is to be all mixed up." In parting, they gave him the woolen for a suit of clothes it was a shame to burn nice suitings. Danies told Clarke he thought a fifty gallon barrel of gasoline would do the trick nicely. Clarke doubled the amount, and suggested that alcohol be added to cover the gasoline fumes. He agreed to pay Danies $700 with $50 more if the blaze was a success. "I will get $2,000 for the job," Clarke explained, "but $300 of it must go to the man who delivers the gas." On election day, November 5th, 1912, the Covitz brothers aston- ished Sam Berkowitz, the clerk, and Abe Levinberg, the errand boy, by granting them a holiday. That afternoon a wagon delivered two big boxes at the rear of the Covitz store. James Ryan, caretaker of the building, offered to help unload the boxes but his offer was declined rather brusquely. He noticed that the Covitzs did not roll the boxes over in the usual way, but pushed and dragged them in. That evening at 6 o'clock Danies, the torch, inserted a key in the Covitz' door and entered. The brothers were not there so he waited. He wanted them to be in the store when he opened the boxes, so that the noise would not arouse suspicion. Later they came and measured goods in the front room while he got the two barrels of gasoline open. Then Paul and Edward left. "Good luck!" they called back at the door. With a bucket the fire-bug dashed the fluid over walls and ceiling and saturated the goods and fixtures. But in his zeal he outdid him- self and, overcome by the gasoline fumes, lay unconscious for several hours. Upon reviving he poured out the second barrel and put on his overcoat. He opened the rear door and got out a match. Danies took pride in his work. -He had spread newspapers over the floor to prevent the sudden gas flame from scorching the boards. He had intended to cut up some lamp wicks as fuses to explode the gasoline. But his accident had shaken his nerve and he was in a hurry to be gone. With one hand on the door he lighted the match. Instantly there was an explosion and the door was hurled shut. Danies tried to pull it open but the gas pressure held it fast. His overcoat was on fire and the flames were reaching his hands and face. He remembered the fate of a Chicago torch who had been burned at his work some months before. Danies had made up his mind to die, but the gas pressure had now become so great that it blew out the front of the building with a force that shattered the windows across the street. Danies was now able to open his door and dashed into the alley. Throwing off his overcoat he ran, beating out the flames on his garments. He was seen from the Illinois Staats-Zeitung. For half an hour the fire kept the firemen at a distance. Then it subsided and they were able to investigate. The force of the explosion had aroused suspicion. Danies had overplayed his part. The smell of gasoline was everywhere. A bolt of woolen from the floor, when brought near a lantern, burst into a blue flame it was saturated. The gasoline barrels, moreover, by the mischance that so often overtakes the incendiary, had not been burned, nor had the boxes into which they fitted. The Covitz brothers, who appeared at this time, simulat- ing surprise and consternation, were placed under arrest. Three days after the arrest Clarke, the public insurance adjuster and head of the arson syndicate, called up Edward J. Raber, one of Hoyne's assistant state's attorneys, and arranged an interview. A third man, named Nathan, who knew Raber, also confided to him what a rich fellow Clarke was and what a lot of business he could furnish a bright young lawyer. At the first meeting Clarke explained that he was a brother Odd Fellow and Mason and suggested to the assistant state's attorney that it would be an easy matter to have "no bill" voted and the Covitz brothers released. At a third meeting, which actually occurred in Raber's own office in the criminal court building, Clarke offered the attorney $500 and shoved half that amount across the table. Concealed witnesses had seen and heard what was going on and Clarke was arrested. At the trial, which sent all three to Joliet, it developed that the Covitz stock had been insured for five times its value. The Covitz fire gave State's Attorney Hoyne the opportunity he wanted. The operations of the arson trust had become so notorious before he came into office that his first official act had been to start a campaign for its punishment. In the ten years between 1897 and 1907 the population of the city had increased but twenty-one per cent but the fire losses had increased eighty-four per cent. In the five years following, the business had become even more systematized and by Seven 1912 it was admitted on all sides that half the city's annual loss was due to incendiarism. The annual tribute paid to the fire bugs by the honestly insured throughout the country estimated from the total in the United States and Canada for 1911 was figured at $257,000,000. It is the policy holders and not the companies that pay the incendiary's profits. Some insurance men denied the existence of an arson trust and laid the excessive fire losses in the United States other cities faced conditions similar to those in Chicago to frame construction. But Norway, Sweden and southern Germany also build wooden houses and their ratio of fires to ours is only one to eight or thirteen. Blame for the scandalous condition in this city appeared to lie between the insurance companies and the prosecuting authorities. The companies were issuing policies without inspection, or safeguard, or investigation to find out the character of the person asking insur- ance. Questionable fires were compromised and little effort made to prosecute. Brokers also liked to take rotten risks because their com- missions were so much higher $50 for a safe building and $250 for a fire-trap. Moreover, arson convictions have always been very hard to obtain, as the evidence is usually destroyed. In 1912 Chicago had 4,410 fires, seven more than London had had in 1911. Yet the records of the criminal court disclosed that prior to Hoyne's administration there had been practically no prosecutions for arson in Cook County. Investigation of the docket of the criminal court from 1904 to December, 1913, showed for that period 172 indict- ments for this crime, and only three convictions ; and in the case of one of these convictions the defendant defaulted upon a $5,000 bond, which was settled for the sum of $100, leaving the defendant at liberty. Whether Clarke and other arson kings had in any way brought about this showing through bribery of officials, detectives and jurors, does not appear. Hoyne set to work to drive the torches out of Chicago. The guilty crowd had fled the city as soon as it learned an investigation was to be made. Search began for Dave Korshak, Jake Schaffner, Abe Rat- ner, Ben Fink, John Danies, Fred Buckmeinster, Felix Melnick, Ben Melnick, the Ross brothers, and a number of important witnesses who had also departed from Chicago. Korshak, Schaffner, Fink and Danies were the "Big Four." Danies and Fink were located and returned to Chicago, and gave information upon which eighty-six indictments were voted against owners of stores who arranged for the arson fires and crooked insurance adjusters. After considerable investigation information was obtained that the Melnick brothers were in Toronto, under assumed names, and opera- tives were sent to that point to keep the general delivery constantly under surveillance. After ten days' wait, Ben Melnick was picked up at the general delivery window of the Toronto post office. A search of Eight his effects revealed the place of occupation of his brother, Felix, who was arrested immediately afterwards. Both were tried and sent to the penitentiary. Abe Ratner, who had been convicted of arson, and who was out on bond, awaiting a new trial, forfeited his bond, and disappeared. He was finally located on a ranch in Saskatchewan, after a search occupy- ing almost a year, and returned to Chicago. He was later tried and sent to the penitentiary. The Ross brothers were located at Omaha, were arrested, and through some influence succeeded in getting out on bond before requisition papers were received. They jumped their bond. They were afterwards heard of in South Africa, where they probably are at the present time. The main search was for Dave Korshak and Jake Schaffner. A woman operative succeeded in obtaining quarters in Schaffner's home, and in four months' time he was located in London. Detectives had previously located Korshak in Shanghai, China, but he moved from there before an arrest could be made. Later it was discovered that he had gone to London, and had joined Schaffner. Somewhat later the two, despairing of eluding longer the Chicago authorities, gave them- selves up. As a result of this campaign seventeen men were sentenced to Joliet for terms of from one to twenty years. Honest property owners in Chicago have benefitted very greatly by the breaking up of the trust. Fire losses in Illinois fell $4,000,000 a year and insurance rates in Chicago were very greatly reduced, the premium on some classes of risks being cut 33% per cent. CHAPTER II Clairvoyant Trust Explains How Widow McEldowney and Many Others Were Victimized, and How the Seers Were Brought to Book MRS. HOPE L. McELDOWNEY, widow, of West Salem, Wis., paused before the door of Prof. Charles T. Crane's clairvoyant suite at 204 North State Street, glanced at the advertisement which she had clipped from her paper that morning in one of the loop hotels, and entered. Mrs. McEldowney had been left a goodly sum of money by the late Mr. McEldowney and wanted to place it ?o that it would bring in an income more in keeping with her ideals. Country bankers were so slow. Within, Prof. Crane's parlors quite lived up to her expectations. The air was heavy with some Oriental perfume. There were rich Turkish rugs and hangings and the subdued light gave one an awsome, "churchy" feeling. A negro attendant bowed the widow to one of the big soft chairs and told her she must wait her turn, but that it would not be long. There were other women present well-dressed, pleasant- Nine appearing women. They were talking among themselves. From their conversation Mrs. McEldowney learned they were all widows, too, and all worried as to what to do with their estates. They told one another and Mrs. McEldowney quite frankly about things. Several introduced themselves and Mrs. McEldowney could do no less. Soon she was exchanging confidences. One by one the widows were allowed to enter into the presence. Prof. Crane was in the holy of holies, far away behind tapestried hang- ings. Presently a ceremonious gentleman, a touch of the mystic in his face and manner, came to Mrs. McEldowney and assured her that she would not be kept waiting long. "It is customary." he explained, "for anyone who comes here for the first time to consult the spirit world, to write upon a sheet of paper her name and address and those questions which she desires to ask the dear departed." He gave the widow several sheets of paper and asked her to write while he stepped from the room for a moment, and fold the paper so that he could not see what was thereon. Upon his return he took the paper, folded as it was, and held it against his forehead. His eyes closed and he seemed as one in a trance. His disengaged hand rose with solemn gesture and he made a slow and profound obesiance. Then his eyes opened again, he smiled pleasantly at the widow and said : "I suppose you don't care for this memorandum any further?" Mrs. McEldowney did not, of course, and the gentleman tore the folded paper into several pieces and threw them into the open grate where they were consumed. Mrs. McEldowney sat for a few moments longer. Then she was summoned into the presence. To her astonishment Prof. Crane, rousing from his trance, greeted her by name, told her at once to be at ease concerning her son, and warned her not to make her contemplated visit to California as calamity was sure to befall her there. These were questions she had written on the paper. Wonderful ! she thought. Prof. Crane perceived at once that some evil influence hung over Mrs. McEldowney and that she would be a happy and exceedingly prosperous woman, if this influence could be removed. He promised to interest the spirits in the matter, accepted the twenty dollars, and requested the widow to return in two days. Upon her return Prof. Crane saw at once that the widow's aura had changed completely. He assured her that everything would be for the best and that she need worry no further if she had only some- one she could consult about her financial affairs. Several days later, when she came again, the professor had had a consultation with his father and an uncle who were both on the board of trade and had been moved to offer their expert assistance. Mrs. McEldowney handed over $500 and received a note for it, the professor being punctilious in the extreme about these matters. Ten Eleven Ten days after her investment the widow received $121 interest on her $500. Prof. Crane explained that it was a very conservative proposition, bonds that were exceptionally safe and at the same time more profitable than any other investment. The professor admitted that James J. Hill was a friend of the family and had made some sug- gestions. Mrs. McEldowney at once ordered her Wisconsin bankers to turn her farm mortgages into cash. She handed Prof. Crane a draft for $2,500 and later on another for $12,500, making $15,500 in all. The widow proved to be exceptionally favored by the spirit world. Not only did she receive dividends but even the great professor came down to a mere human plane of existence and took her out to cafes and theaters and was very attentive until her money ran out. Finding the studio door closed to her then, the widow at last real- ized that she had been swindled. She laid the case before the detective bureau and was very courteously asked to wait while an investigation was being made. She waited waited for weeks. But, no matter how often she went back to the bureau, nothing ever seemed to have been discovered as to Prof. Crane and her thousands. ****** Now this is the other side of the story as finally ascertained by State's Attorney Hoyne : In the summer of 1911, Christian P. Bertsche, better known as "Barney" Bertsche, who had a saloon at 207 W'est Randolph Street, and was the most eminent middle man in the business of Chicago crime, representing the thieves, thugs and confidence artists on one hand, and crooked officers of the detective bureau on the other, arranged with his police friends for the operation of certain swindlers who were to work as seers and clairvoyants. Bertsche first granted a clairvoyant concession to Harry Waite to operate at 1128 Michigan Avenue under the alias of David K. Ross. In November Frank Ryan, a clairvoyant of some seventeen years' experience, finding his criminal record a handicap in New York and Boston, came to Chicago and joined with Waite, both appearing as Prof. Ross. They paid Bertsche $400 a month for the privilege of swindling the people without molestation. Business was so good that Bertsche now put a fellow named Wagg into business at 1710 Michigan Avenue. Frank Ryan was making so much money that in May, 1912, he opened a new place at 1316 Michi- gan Avenue and operated as Prof. Robert L. Milton. Another clair- voyant, "Doc" Russell, opened up at 1128 Michigan Avenue, as Prof. W. H. Stone and contributed some $400 a month to the Bertsche income. In the summer of 1912 James Ryan, a brother of Frank's, came to town to share in the good work, and opened a handsome suite at 204 North State Street, to which his advertisement later brought the Widow McEldowney. All of them advertised extensively and all of them paid handsomely to "Barney" for the monopoly he was able to afford them. Twelve In the early part of 1913, when Hoyne was just getting his hands adjusted to the machinery of the great prosecuting office, Bertsche was enjoying a gross income of some $1,200 a month from his clairvoyants. These in turn were each dealing with from sixty to seventy victims a day. Frank Ryan, as Prof. Ross, in a year and a half of operation cleaned up about $80,000. Jimmy Ryan, as Prof. Crane, collected $60,000 in seven busy months. In the advertisements, palm and astrological readings were quoted at only fifty cents or a dollar. But few victims ever got out so cheaply. The system was to ascertain how much money the prospect had, and then get it. Most of the customers were women ; widows, middle aged and plump hence "thirty-eights." They usually wanted to get in touch with deceased husbands to find out what these would advise as to investments. When Mrs. McEldowney and all the other victims entered Prof. Crane's parlors, the widows she found there were not rf ally widows. They were employes there for the purpose of finding out her name, address, what she wanted to know, and everything else about her. They talked freely of their own lives and the victim would naturally be led to talk of hers. If she did not confide freely enough an assistant would try her with the paper trick. For the paper she gave him, with the questions written on it, he would substitute a blank fold of paper and throw this into the fire. Prof. Crane and "Doc" Russell also used dictographs. If the prospect did not betray herself through any of these means she would find the professor so intranced in a trance that he could do little if anything for her that day. Upon her departure she was followed and her neighbors pumped. Upon the second visit all would be as clear as crystal. After the "thirty-eight" had been caught, it was usual to get her to invest her funds in copper mining stock. Each of the astrologers kept a fine assortment of certificates. Mrs. McEldowney was the "big thirty-eight," but there were many others. Mrs. Mary Rapp, of Naper- ville, 111., invested $11,000 in these fake certificates, Frank Crane being her swindler. These were perhaps the largest individual sums but it was no uncommon thing to take a thousand or two from some woman who depended on her income for a living. Early in 1913 the clairvoyants took fright, learning that Hoyne was after them, and fled the city. In the search that followed Willie Neff, alias Prof. Salisbury, was the first arrested. His parents had a rooming house on Michigan Avenue and a detective installed there as a lodger was able to find out that Willie was returning to the city for a visit. The house was surrounded and the clairvoyant captured. By searching Neff's effects the trust's code book was found. The Ryans were traced to Kansas City by their baggage. They escaped there and James Ryan's baggage was followed to Lusk, Wyoming. Frank Crane, it was finally discovered through a telephone call, had moved from his hotel to a certain house. He was followed but again Thirteen escaped. Jesse Gillage, colored doorkeeper for Frank Ryan, and one of the smartest of the gang, also escaped from the house where he had been located in Kansas City. He was followed to Omaha, to Syracuse, to York, Pa., to New York City, to a farm in Vermont, to Pittsburgh and finally to Cleveland, where he was arrested. NefF, who had promised to help locate the gang, had been permitted out in Chicago on bond, but disappeared. He was located, however, in San Francisco and brought back to Chicago. The clairvoyants were now all under cover. By watching the advertisements in all the news- papers of the country,- however, Hoyne finally detected a familiar wording in an advertisement appearing in Columbus, This "store" was found to be in operation by a minor member of the gang and he was not molested. Finally old "Doc" Russell showed up and was promptly arrested. This was in October, 1913. He made a confession. Professor Wagg was arrested in Montreal in August, 1913. He got out on bail, ran away and was re-arrested in Boston. After this Harry Waite, the first member of the syndicate to operate in Chicago, was arrested in St. Louis. He was decoyed into the Western Union Building by a fake telegram and surrendered only after a desperate fight. Frank Crane was finally arrested in Detroit in November, 1913. This accounts for all the gang but the man who had given them permission to operate "Barney" Bertsche. With Bertsche it was, to a certain extent, a case of too much money. The thing that placed him entirely within the hands of Hoyne was Mrs. McEldowney's bank draft for $12,500. Now, you will understand, even the most proficient of swindlers dislikes to cash so large a draft. There may be embarrassing complications. Jimmy Ryan, alias Prof. Crane, endorsed the draft to a fictitious B. P. Christy. "Barney" Bertsche impersonated this indi- vidual and had a friend introduce him as such at the Union Trust Company. "I've had trouble with my wife," he explained, "and don't want her to know of this deposit." He put in some of his own cash with the draft. A few days later he drew out the entire amount. This transaction, following the arrest of the clairvoyants, sent "Barney" Bertsche to Joliet, together with all the other men mentioned except Frank Ryan, who was mortally ill at the time of his arrest. As an epitaph to the career of "Barney" Bertsche, the Chicago Journal said at the time of his conviction : "State's Attorney Hoyne deserves a vote of thanks for convicting 'Barney' Bertsche and 'Prof.' Charles T. Crane. "It was no light task to bring these scamps to justice. Among the retail rascals of Chicago, Bertsche and Crane rank high. Crane is head of the so-called 'clairvoyant trust' and 'Barney' Bertsche doubtless has more pull and influence than any other citizen of the underworld in Chicago. "He was believed to be official fixer for practically all the pick- pockets and jack-rollers operating in the city. The 'mob' that wanted Fourteen to do business in Chicago had to 'split' with Barney, or its career was short and full of policemen's clubs. "Mr. Hoyne deserves much credit for starting these evil creatures on their way to the penitentiary." \Ye have now accounted for all the members of the clairvoyant trust except its most important members the grafting detectives. CHAPTER III Wiretapper's Trust In Which the Great John Henry Strosnider is put Behino the Bars READERS, meet Mr. John Henry (Big Jack) Strosnider. now of Joliet, but one time king of the wiretappers and confidence men. You will find him a most interesting character. For twenty years, assisted by Joseph ("Yellow Kid") Weil and others, he operated in Chicago in full fellowship (partnership would be a better word) with those members of the detective bureau who should have been his enemies. So surprising was his conviction that it caused general newspaper comment. "The full meaning of this," said the Chicago Tribune, "is that 'Big Jack' Strosnider, surpassing in ingenuity all the confidence men, thieves, swindlers and jail evaders the century has known, has been turned down by trie United States Supreme Court. State's Attorney Hoyne thus becomes the first to put behind the prison walls this prince of skulduddery since President McKinley pardoned him." "It was the first time in his twenty years of operating as a wire- tapper, fake fight promoter and seller of spurious stock and bonds," adds the Examiner, "that Strosnider ever slept in the penitentiary. State's Attorney Hoyne put him there." The pardon by President McKinley was granted in December, 1898. Strosnider had served eighteen months of a five-year sentence, the only punishment he ever suffered. Strosnider's wife, with a baby in her arms, went to the White House and wept on the president's knee. The pardon resulted. At the time of Strosnider's trial indictments were returned against seven other leaders of the swindlers' trust, these including Joseph Weil, alias the "Yellow Kid," Patrick Kane, John D. Snarley, Clarence Forbes, George Wakefield, Edward Burns and Thomas O'Byrne. The gang was broken up. Perhaps the best remembered exploit of Strosnider was the swin- dling of Dr. William T. Kirby out of $20,000. This loss caused the failure of the Kirby private bank. This transaction brings us back to old friends, for Strosnider could not have operated so successfully had he not been a partner of "Barney" Bertsche. Frank Ryan also found time from the clairvoyant game, to assist in the Kirby swindle. Fifteen Indeed the affair was pulled off in the quarters at 1710 Michigan Avenue, occupied by Prof. Salisbury, one of the clairvoyant trust. The Kirby swindle happened in the fall of 1912 and is typical of Strosnider's work. One day in July a stranger entered Kirby's bank and began an acquaintance with the old banker by asking him concerning a building across the street. Later this individual known to Kirby as Charles Kissell met Kirby at various public places and the acquaintance grew. On October 28, "Kissell" came into the bank and said a brother-in-law of his had come to town and that he, "Kissell," wanted Kirby to\ talk over a business matter with the relative. The brother- in-law, of course, was Strosnider. He was using the name of Shea. Kirby and "Kissell" met Strosnider, who told Kirby that he was a confidential man in the employ of the Western Union Telegraph Company ; that he had been working in Pitttsburgh, but had been transferred to Chicago for ten days ; that the telegraph company had devised a cipher code for transmitting and receiving results of horse races from the various race-tracks of the country, and that his duty while in Chicago would be to receive such messages, decipher them and. transmit them to the various pool rooms in the city of Chicago; that it was within his power to withhold a message for a reasonable length of time after receiving it, and that if Kirby would station him- self at some place convenient to a pool room he would telephone him the results of horse races before sending them to that pool room, and Kirby would thereby be enabled to bet on the horse that had won the race. Strosnider gave Kirby a list of six alleged pool rooms and then went back to work. Kirby and "Kissell" tried the first pool room, but could not gain admittance. At the second a man on the stairs said there was nothing doing, but directed them to 1710 Michigan Avenue and wrote them a pass. The pair entered a drug store next the sup- posed pool room and got into touch with Strosnider through Kirby's bank. Strosnider gave Kirby the name of the winner, and the two hurried into 1710 Michigan Avenue, where they were admitted by the same man who had directed them to the place. "Kissell" had suggested that as it was the first day it might be wise only to place a small bet. So they put in only $10. "O'Brien," the man in charge, explained to them that he would take their little bet for once, but that this was a place for big play, where gentlemen of means bet all the way from $10,000 to $50,000 on a race. Kirby apologized and said he and his friend would try to come up to class on the following day. While Kirby was placing his $10 bet a person addressed as Judge Mahoney was informed that he now owed the house $4,000. The judge said he would send a check in the morning, and ordered his car. Kirby heard a telegraph instrument in another room click, and then a voice announced that the race was closed. A moment later the Sixteen result was made known and Kirby and his friend received $20 for their $10. Later the pair met Strosnider at the Blackstone, and Kirby, at their solicitation, agreed to bring $20,000 the following day. Stro- snider made a point of its being in $1,000 bills or smaller denomina- tions. According to the plan, Kirby and "Kissell" stationed them- selves in a cigar store and Kirby was informed by Strosnider over the phone that Lucky George had won the race. They went into the pool room, "O'Brien" took the money, the hidden telegraph instrument clicked, the voice recounted the race in detail and finally announced the winner. Lucky George had come in only second. At St. Hubert's Inn the pair met Strosnider. The swindler insisted he had told Kirby to bet on Lucky George, not as winner, but for place. "Anyway," he said, "don't worry. A friend in Milwaukee is going to send me $100,000 tomorrow and I'll give you back the $20,000 and we'll operate with the rest." That was the last Kirby saw of Strosnider until after the arrest of the wire tapper. * * * * * * Strosnider knew how to run a "pay-off joint" to perfection. Steerers for this swindle hang around the leading hotels and get acquainted with cattlemen and others who possess a combinaion of money and innocence. The steerer, having got acquainted with the Iowa farmer, leads him out to the vicinity of the pay-off joint. Sud- denly the stranger says to the farmer : "You see that man across the street? I think that is Col. Gates, the man who won $100,000 on a horse race last week in St. Louis." He walks over to the man and says, "Aren't you Col. Gates?" The man modestly admits he is the colonel and that he is the individual who made the big killing at St. Louis. The stranger then says, "Can't you let me and my friend in on something good?" Whereupon the colonel says: "Yes, there is a place over here where there is a little betting going on. We might go over." At the joint Col. Gates wins two or three small wagers. Then he stakes $20,000 and promises to give the farmer one-third of the win- nings. He puts up his check and the horse wins. "Go and collect our money," he says to the farmer. But the cashier declines to pay because the check might not have been good. There is a consultation and each agrees to bring what money he can get, so that the winnings can be paid out. The farmer packs back to Iowa and gets $5,000 or $10,000. Upon the return they all three go to the joint and turn in the money. Then the steerer and the colonel get into a fight over a division of profits, the colonel is knocked down and bites a capsule of red stain which he has in his mouth. The "blood" oozes between his lips and someone says, "My God, boys, he's dead !" The steerer grabs the farmer by the arm. "Come on out," he whispers; "the Seventeen police will be here in a minute and we shall be arrested for murder. We can come back for the money tomorrow." The farmer is hustled out of the pay-off joint, out of the city and the state, and made to believe that he must lay low or the police, who are looking for the murderer, will 'get him. When he realizes he has been swindled he often refuses to prosecute. This game was worked hundreds of times in Chicago in the old days, but has ceased to make history since Hoyne sent the trust to the penitentiary. CHAPTER IV. Pickpocket Trust In Which Eddie, the Immune, Pays a Belated Visit to Joliet THIS trust throve under police protection for years, until the busi- ness came to be looked upon as one of the necessary evils of life in a large city. Eddie Jackson was the king of the pick- pockets. He operated for many years, principally in Chicago, and it was currently said that he and his gang had filched from the pockets of our people more than a million dollars. Though often caught by his victims and turned over to the detectives, he always escaped with a fine or a jail sentence, and at the time of Hoyne's election as state's attorney was known to the country as "Eddie the Immune." Hoyne broke his immunity early 'in his administration by three felony convictions in succession, under which "Eddie the Immune" was sent to Joliet, where he is now living. The situation as it existed is well told in an interview given by "Eddie the Immune" to a Chicago Examiner reporter, printed on the 25th of October, 1914: "I paid protection myself for fourteen years. How much it aggre- gated I don't know, but in percentages it took half of all I ever got to keep me squared with the police, to hire lawyers to defend me when I had to stand for an arrest to make things look good, and to stay friendly with the petty politicians who boss the police department from the green- est 'harness bull' up. "In the old days, when the 'picking was good/ I used to take care of the strange pickpockets when they came into town. The cop- pers would arrest them and rearrest them until they saw the great light and came into the ring. Then I would steer them into 'right'. territory, where the presiding police could look on without becoming too interested. "And from these newcomers and the old-timers, too, I used to col- lect the 'protection' money. In the * * * days I used to take a weekly roll to the old Bertsche saloon. Sometimes it ran so high as $5.000 a week. After Bertsche was closed up there were four other places where the money went. * * * Eighteen "Barney" (Christian P.) Bertsche, who guaranteed immunity from arrest to clair- voyants, wiretappers, pickpockets, gunmen and other criminals, at so much ppr month. As their representative he paid thousands of dollars to the graft syndi- cate in the detective bureau. Nineteen "There has always been a system of police graft and criminal pro- tection in Chicago. As long as politicians are allowed to force the policemen who would be honest to go to 'the woods' for interfering with criminals who stand in favor with the politicians that system will continue. When some system is devised to protect the policeman who is essentially honest, graft will cease." The offenses that sent Eddie over the road were committed in April, 1913. On the 15th, with the aid of Harry Britton, he picked the pocket of John A. Putz on an Ogden Avenue car, and got $16. On the 23rd, he, with Frank O'Neill and J. Hannon, took $100 from the pocket of John McArty on a Madison Street car. Eddie was caught in the act and his protection failed him at last. So well were the pickpockets organized that those belonging to the trust carried what might be described as union cards to distinguish them from outside workers who were subject to arrest. These cards had a double perforation that was meaningless to the unitiated but very important to the pickpockets themselves and to the crooked detectives. The thieves also maintained a clearing house for stolen pocketbooks. The thief had to turn his plunder over to the heads of the trust, who held the purse for a certain number of days to see whether it had belonged to anyone whose "rap" had to be considered. If the bereaved individual proved to be one who could make trouble, the pocketbook and its contents were returned. Otherwise, the ordinary citizen who complained got no redress. The existence of this clearing house was proved when, in the sum- mer of 1914, some misguieded thief filched the purse of Judge Rufus Robinson. The judge had come up from down-state to do relief work in the municipal court. The wallet had contained $300 in cash and securities. The irate judge announced to a cetrain police officer in his court room that the property would have to be returned at once or there would be excitement enough for all. ^Jext day the purse came back by mail. The pickpocket who did any particular job only received about twenty per cent of the profits. The rest was retained by his superiors to pay protection and attorney's fees and other expenses. It is an amusing bit of political information to know that, were Roosevelt, Bryan and Taft to be candidates again, the Colonel would get the unanimous vote of the pickpockets. During the presidential tour the thieves followed the candidates about the country, falling into line with those who meant to shake the big men by the hand. So often were they in line that Taft and Bryan got to know them and would point them out to the local officers as pickpockets. Roose- velt, for some reason or other, did not do this at least the thieves so say. In the city districts commanded by crooked captains the pick- Twenty pockets' hangout was usually a saloon owned or operated by a friend or relative of the police official. A share of the loot was turned in by the thief to the saloonkeeper. The pickpocket also regarded it as policy to spend much of his profits over the official bar. Sometimes a detective went along with the crook so that if there was an outcry he might be arrested by a friend, and not by a strange officer. After the friendly copper had taken his prisoner a block or two away, they would have a drink and part to resume operations. When there had been too much hubbub for this sort of thing, the prisoner was held, and the complaining witness bought off or tired out by unending delays. The grafting officer also got his percentage from the professional bonds- man who bails out the thief. For the information of the reader it may be repeated here that the authorities regard with suspicion the individual at summer amusement parks who offers to weigh you free if he fails to guess your heft. This man, in patting your person over to find out how much fat you have concealed in your clothes, also finds out if he so chooses where your pocketbook is. If he is one of a gang of crooks he indicates where the plunder lies by placing his hand on one of his own pockets. You are followed until the opportunity comes. CHAPTER V Burglary Trust Explaining How Business Methods May Be Applied to House Breaking The Trust Sent to Prison THE burglary trust was at its prime. Whole stocks of goods were being removed from Chicago stores. Along with the mer- chandise often would go the fireproof safe. Later, perhaps, it would be found, blown open, in some building rented for the purpose by the outlaws. It seemed impossible to identify the burglars. Very occasionally a man would be brought in whom everyone believed to be one of the trust. But for some reason the state's witnesses always fell down in some detail or other and spoiled the case. Mat- ters had been going on thus for five or six years, and getting worse. There seemed no limit to the boldness of the robbers. These organized burglars did not bother with residential work. They were business men and could not afford to fritter away their time in mere adventure. All their energy was given to the method- ical breaking and entering of dry-goods stores and other commercial establishments. Now and then they raided a freight car in the yards, when it was known to contain something worth while. Their Joot often ran as much as $10,000 a night. Doing two or three jobs Tivcnty-one a week, some of these men had accumulated unto themselves very considerable fortunes. "There are just two things that we have to find out," said State's Attorney Hoyne. "One is, how do the burglars get their plunder to the receivers of stolen goods? The other is, why do the police always fail to make a case when they have their man in court? When we know those two things we know all." The first problem, proved most difficult of solution. But the state's attorney's operatives finally uncovered the ingenious scheme. The burglars would put their stolen dry goods into trunks or boxes of the kind that would pass for personal baggage. They would then cart them to a railway station and get a receipt for them. This receipt would be turned over to the receivers of stolen goods. The receivers would then buy a railway ticket on some other road and check the goods as baggage. The transfer wagon would get the trunks or boxes and they would come into possession of the receiver of stolen goods or his agents without his ever having been near them. A more effective means of protecting the dealers could hardly have been devised. The second problem at first seemed even more mystifying. But at last it was demonstrated that the trust burglars included in their organization several important officials of the police department. When a gangster was arrested, either by design to divert suspicion, or by an honest policeman, his police protector would appear as the officer in charge of the case for the people, and he would make it his business to have the gangster discharged at the preliminary hearing^ if possible, or before the grand jury, if possible, or with a misde- meanor conviction before the court, if nothing better could be obtained. If none of these things could be accomplished, and the criminal had to face a jury on a felony charge, then this detective in charge would manage to say something, as a witness for the people, suf- ficiently in favor of the accused to create a reasonable doubt, and bring about his acquittal. Hoyne discovered this trick of the officer in charge, and secured his first conviction against the burglary trust without the aid of the officer's testimony. When this convicted gangster had spent five months in Joliet, and had realized that "pro- tection" was not being made good to him, he requested an interview with Hoyne and told the shocking story. Captain James O'Dea Storen and Sergeant Michael Weisbaum proved to be the foremost members of the burglary trust. The burglaries were committed by Nathan Steinberg, Morris Mendelsohn, 'Isidore Wexler, Sam Smith, Jack Schnieder, Harry Green, and Morris Dressier. The principal receivers were Barney Melnich, Israel Ticot- sky and Max (Cockeye) Goldstein. The workings of this crime syndicate became public at the trial. An amusing feature was the attempt made by Captain Storen and Sergeant Weisbaum to divert suspicion from themselves. The bur- glars took $4,000 'worth of woolens from Schartz Brothers and left them in a bakery wagon so that the two police officials could pounce upon the plunder, get a nice newspaper mention and claim the $500 reward. The money was later divided with the burglars. At another time, when Wexler and Steinberg had ransacked a store, Wexler accidentally left his coat behind. In one of its pockets was his parole card. Promptly, Storen and Weisbaum came into court to the rescue. The sergeant proved to the satisfaction of Every- one that Wexler had lost his parole card some months before, and the captain testified that the coat in which it was found was not Wexler's and did not fit him. This assistance cost the two burglars $200 in fees to their police protectors. Of the receivers of stolen goods, Melnich and Goldsmith had been in business for twenty years and had never been convicted. As a result of Hoyne's crusade, Captain Storen and Sergeant Weisbaum, Isadore Wexler, Nathan Steinberg, Morris Mendelson, Harry Green, Sam Smith and Barney Melnich were convicted. Isador Ticotsky got off with a year'in the bridewell. The trust will not resume opera- tions for several years if Hoyne is re-elected. CHAPTER VI Detective Bureau Criminals In Which, at Last, We Reach the Men Higher Up LINK by link Hoyne's chain of investigation and prosecution led him ifearer and nearer to the real cause of organized and pro- tected crime. To have been content with the conviction of the heads of the various criminal trusts, without the annihilation ot the power on which they depended for their existence and success, would have resulted only in a change in the leadership of the syndi- cates the pickpocket trust, the arson trust, the burglary trust, the wiretapper-confidence game trust, and the clairvoyant trust. All the criminal combinations required the connivance of the dishonest poli- tician and police official for their success. To rid Chicago of this contemptible collusion would break down the system of organized crime. This Hoyne realized, and followed the trail into the city's detective bureau, in search of no individual, but determined to prose- cute without fear or favor any police official whom he found to be a traitor to his public trust. In November, 1913, with the heads of the clairvoyant trust, Hoyne convicted "Barney" Bertsche, the go-between. It was through Bertsche that all these combinations were permitted to operate, not Twenty-three only unmolested, but actually protected. "If anybody could startle Chicago, it was this strange toad from the swamps of crime, with his prison record, his political pull, his desperate temper, and his fol- lowing,'' said a leading Chicago paper in editorial comment. On November 17, 1914, the supreme court of Illinois upheld the conviction of Bertsche, who was out on bond. The criminal detect- ives knew what this meant "Barney" believed he had been double- crossed and would try to get even. Representatives of the "law" were sent to take him to Joliet, but on the way on Randolph Street, in midafternoon tried to murder him. In the gun battle that fol- lowed, Bertsche, unfortunately for the grafters in the detective bureau, was only wounded and recovered to tell his story. It was the New York Rosenthal-Becker case all over again, but with a different ending. On December 2, 1914, the state's attorney made his famous dec- laration that the detective bureau was a den of thieves. Mayor Thompson was quoted in the Chicago Tribune later as saying: "The police department stinks. The police department is honey- combed with grafters, who are collecting money all over the city. I am told there are men in the detective bureau who know every pick- pocket, safeblower and that class of criminals in the city." Within three days after Hoyne's statement Captain John J. Hal- pin, head of the bureau : Lieutenant John H. Tobin and Sergeant William Egan were indicted by the grand jury on various charges of conspiracy and accepting bribes. Later, Captain James O'Dea Storen, Walter O'Brien, Michael Weisbaum and other members of the police force also were indicted. What Hoyne accomplished is better told by the following summary: Guilty Captain John J. Halpin, Captain James O'Dea Storen, Sergeant William Egan, Sergeant Walter O'Brien, Sergeant Michael Weisbaum. Awaiting trial Lieutenant John H. Tobin. Suspended from police department Sergeant John J. O'Keefe, Sergeant James Monaghan. Resigned after filing of charges Sergeant John J. Dempsey, Ser- geant William Carmody. Not guilty Frederick Roth (who is now awaiting trial on a charge of subornation of perjury in the case in which he was acquitted). There is not an honest policeman or a public-spirited citizen in Chicago who will not rejoice that the crooked element of the police department is being driven from the force. It is up to the voters to see that the crime syndicates do not succeed in their plan of getting back through the coming election. We will now take another glance into the workings of the clair- voyant trust to see how valuable police friendship and assistance Twenty-four 1. Captain John J. Halpin, head of the Detective Bureau, sentenced to Joliet for being the protector for a monthly 1 fee of "Barney" Bertsche and other criminals. 2. Captain James O'Dea Storen, convicted as being in league with the million dollar burglary trust. 3. Sergeant Michael Weisbaum, convicted as protector of million dollar burglar trust. Captain Storen's Handy Andy. 4. Sergeant Walter O'Brien, convicted as protector of clair- vovarit trust. Twenty-five may be to a band of swindlers. In the beginning, before "Barney" Bertsche could open the first of these astrological parlors, he had to reach an agreement with Captain Halpin. He arranged to pay the captain $100 a month for protection for this one office. He also agreed to give the captain ten per cent of the money taken in by a set of wire-tappers also working under his guidance. How profit- able this later proviso proved to the detective chief may be shown by instancing a single transaction the swindling of Dr. William E. Kirby, which paid Halpin $2,000 cash. In order that smooth sailing should be assured for his clairvoyant proteges, "Barney" next selected the detectives who would work on clairvoyant cases. Halpin allowed him to pick Walter O'Brien and Joseph Carmody. Bertsche put O'Brien on the payroll for $100 a month. The detective regularly consulted with "Barney" at his saloon and took orders. At the time that "Jimmy" Ryan opened his parlors as Prof. Charles T. Crane, Bertsche raised the pay of Halpin and O'Brien to $200 a month each. By the time that Bertsche's income from the parlors had reached $1,200 a month, he was paying out $500 of this to the police. Among the services rendered by the detectives for this remunera- tion was the saving of old "Doc" Russell from the California authori- ties. The doctor was working the town of Ottawa and has been arrested by Deputy Sheriff Benjamin F. Krause, who recognized in him the i.ian for whom the Coast police were offering a $100 reward. Bertsche 1:2.1 one of his henchmen, Ed Giroux, swear out a false complaint against old "Doc" Russell, charging him with a $600 swindle in Chicago. Detectives O'Brien and Carmondy were then sent down to rescue the well-known clairvoyant. The Ottawa sheriff preferred California to Chicago until he learned that Chicago also offered $100 reward. Then he turned Russell over to Halpin's representatives. Upon the prisoner's arrival in Chicago he was not even taken into court and the complaining witness, Giroux, having disappeared, he was discharged. California then begged Captain Halpin to turn Russell over, but the petition was ignored and the old doctor was set up as a clairvoyant, to help swell the detective captains' revenues. So many complaints were filed against Prof. Charles T. Crane in the. autumn of 1912 that the detective bureau had to make a show- ing by a fake arrest. "Jimmy" Ryan, alias the professor, insisted that his name must not be used, as it would hurt business. The com- plaint, as it came from the clerical department of the bureau, was against Charles T. Crane, but O'Brien arranged so that the warrant, bond and title of the case read A. C. Crane, thus avoiding any scan- dal among the clairvoyant's "thirty-eights." Nobody, of course, was arrested, but O'Brien wrote a letter to the chief of police, for the official files, saying that Prof. Charles T. Crane had been arrested. Twenty-sif For two years the clairvoyants ran their confidence game wide open, despite a personal request from Mayor Harrison to Captain Halpin that a special investigation be made of them. The detectives even went further with their protection of the trust, and drove unau- thorized competitors out of business. There was a city ordinance against fortune telling, and O'Brien, at the suggestion of Prof. Crane, used it to close out Prof. Kronberg, Prof. Reynolds and other inter- fering persons. Later on, it is said, O'Brien even drove old "Doc" Russell out of town for Prof. Crane's benef.t. After Russell's place was closed his furniture was carted up to O'Brien's home. O'Brien was a business man. All the time that Frank Ryan (Prof. Ross) was operating, Halpin and his crowd knew the clairvoyant was wanted in Boston. His pic- ture and description appeared in "The Detective," a police paper, and Ryan even had Captain Halpin write to Boston at one time and find out whether he was being sought. The criminals in the bureau also protected the clairvoyants against the complaints of defrauded citizens. Halpin, O'Brien and Bertsche made a desperate fight to keep Hoyne from getting Prof. Crane back to Chicago for trial, after his arrest in Wyoming. The wetsern authorities naturally notified the detective bureau and it was at once arranged that Detective O'Brien should hurry out west and rescue his friend. But Hoyne held O'Brien in Chicago and sent Assistant State's Attorney George C. Bliss and Detective William Murnane. Bertsche then faked a complaint in Kansas City and sent a crooked officer up to get the clairvoyant for the alleged Missouri crime. The Wyoming authorities were not fooled, however. Habeas corpus proceedings were next instituted and Ed Giroux, who had served in the rescue of old "Doc" Russell, appeared as a witness. He said Prof. Cr'ane had swindled him out of $1,000 in Chicago, but that "Jimmy" Ryan, the prisoner, was not Crane. Again the trick failed, for Mrs. McEldowney was sent lor and identified the swindler. Habeas corpus proceedings were next started in the supreme court of Wyoming, but this move also was beaten. "Barney" Bertsche laid a last trap in Omaha, having had fake extradition papers sworn out hi Nebraska. A gang was em- ployed to overpower the honest detective and take Prof. Crane from him "in the name of the law." But this trick failed also. Bertsche, Ryan (Crane), Halpin, O'Brien and others were indicted and con- victed and the criminal organization in the detective bureau broken up. A little detail will show how cleverly and carefully the graft machine was constructed and operated. Bertsche had to make regu- lar monthly payments to a number of detectives. To have gone behind a door and paid them over the money might have caused com- ment. Everything must be in the open. So it was arranged that the detective would lounge into "Barney's" bar some evening Twenty-seven when it was crowded and, after a casual remark or two, ask for a match. Bertsche would hand over a box of them, the detective would scratch one on the box and then put the box in his pocket. Within, the container was a roll of bills. CHAPTER VII Horse Thief Trust In Which the Wild Western Gangsters Go to Joliet { f ~]\ /T R. HOYNE," said Jabez C. Howe of Homewood, Illinois, |\/| one day shortly after the state's attorney assumed office; "if you were to make a guess, what particular spot in the United States would you pick out as the happy home of the horse thief?" Mr. Hoyne laughed. "Why," said he, "I should suggest the Big Bend country down along the Rio Grande or the Hole-in-the-Wall out Northwest as being the place of business of the sort of desperado that steals horses." "Wrong," said Howe of Homewood. "Mr. Hoyne, the greatest nest of horse thieves the nation has ever seen is operating right here today in Cook County!" "Nonsense. Why, there haven't been a half dozen convictions in twice as many years." "That's just it, Mr. Hoyne. None of your predecessors would take the matter seriously. Neither the state's attorney's office nor the police could be brought to realize what was going on. But, as a matter of fact, official records show that in the last half dozen years more horses have been stolen in Cook County than in the states of Texas, North and South Dakota and Wyoming put together." Whereupon began one of the most important and most successful outlaw hunts known to recent American criminal history ; a hunt that freed the Cook County towns and farms of the horse thief trust and brought Chicago's suburbs once more within the bounds of civilized law and order. It was when, in October, W13, the bandits descended upon the farms near Chicago Heights one night and drove off fifteen fine horses that the state's attorney's office gained its first clue. It was learned that in one of the Pennsylvania railway's freight yards in Chicago a car had been reserved to transport horses to Pittsburgh. This car was watched, and when five men appeared with twelve horses they were arrested. "So far, so good," said Mr. Hoyne. "But these men are only small rascals. We haven't got to the brains of the trust yet. Have these prisoners watched night and day." It was in pursuance of these orders that Detective Sergeant Wil- Twenty-eight iiam Murnane, a few clays later, saw a key pass between one of the prisoners in the county jail and a woman who had been a witness on These fine horses, belonging to Ferd Bramsteadt. living near Chicago Heights, were stolen by, and recovered from, the horsethief trust. -More horses were annually stolen in Cook County than in four cowboy states combined, including Texas. behalf of the thieves. The woman was followed and watched. It soon began to be appreciated that she was no mere friend of the jailed outlaws but, in fact, their means of communication w r ith the heads of the gang. Enough information was obtained to convict the woman of perjury and she was arrested and bound over to the grand jury by Judge Brentano. She thereupon confessed herself the wife of Frank Gordon, alias Smalley, alias O'Gorman, one of the most notorious horse thieves in the United States. The woman challenged the authorities, however, to find her hus- band. But by watching the mails State's Attorney Hoyne found that Gordon was in San Francisco, in charge of the western office of the "business." Gordon was captured by surprise, disarmed, and brought to Chicago where he received the maximum sentence sixty years. A chance admission of Mrs. Gordon's also set the prosecuting office's detectives upon the trail of Harry Lutz, alias Burkhart, alias Hartman, alias Dunlap, who was in charge of the trust's operations in Chicago and apparently its head. But Lutz escaped from Chicago. Hoyne's detective followed him from Illinois to San Francisco, from San Francisco to San Diego, from San Diego up and down the state. Twenty-nine Finally at Stockton, in a regular oiovie finish, the officer of the law closed in on the desperado and captured him just as he was about to escape into the hills. Lutz feigned resignation. He went to jail to await extradition papers, professing a willingness to return and pay the penalty of his felonies. But two days later a penciled note was found under one of the barred windows of the jail. It read : "This here horse thief feller they put in Tuesday has made it up with the three other men in here to trip up the jailor tonight and get to his gun and shoot him so they kin make a getaway. Quinn." The guards being doubled Lutz could not escape. But the head of the trust, somewhere in America State's Attorney Hoyne had long since made up his mind that the genius of the gang was still free managed to supply the prisoner with funds and to start habaes corpus proceedings, which would have given him a chance to escape before the officer could arrive from Illinois. Assistant State's Attorney Dwight McKay was rushed to California, papers were secured and Lutz' attorneys beaten by the trick of taking the prisoner twenty miles across country in an automobile and flagging the limited train between stations. Lutz was tried and sentenced to sixty years. The gang was now all behind the bars except its real heads Abe Lubin and his son, Max. The younger Lubin was soon caught and given the maximum sentence. But it took two years to apprehend the father. Finally, after a dozen changes of name and abode, he was run down by one of Hoyne's officers. But, when the warrant he had so long eluded was read to the old man, he fell over dead. From first to Ir.st twenty-seven men were convicted and sent to Joliet. The most important of these were: Fred Kleidon, Edward Lozarski, Harry Lozarski, A. Cunningham, D. J. Dargen, Owen Dough- erty, Daniel Felletti, Frank M. Jordan, Geo. Graham, Peter Hahn, Stanley Kalkowski, Geo. Lindblom, Harry Lutz, Jas. Mooney, Jr., Edw. Rasmussen, Jos. Sintowski and Robt. Thomas. Many of the stolen horses also were recovered, in this one short campaign State's Attorney Hoyne freed the farmers of Cook County from a band of outlaws who had had them at their mercy for years. CHAPTER VIII Auto Thief, Auto Bandit and Auto Murderer Explaining How the Motor Car Has Come to Be the Main Factor in Crime IN THE old days it was the horse that figured in crime. Either he ' was stolen by the horse thief or he assisted the bandit in his deeds of violence. Today, however, the automobile has become the center around which all crime revolves. The car is now the easiest and most valuable loot that city or country affords, and it is the best friend of Thirtv the auto bandit and the best weapon of the auto murderer. The automobilej in fact, has been making criminal history in Chicago in the last three years. First we demonstrated to the world that an auto could be considered as an instrument of murder Hoyne sent Lawrence Lindbloom and Fred Hrudek to the penitentiary for murder with an automobile, a new crime. Then we had our auto bandits, the Webb gang, that terrorized the city and murdered Detective Peter Hart, and the Eddie Mack gang that held up the Washington Park State Bank and was caught, tried and sent to Joliet all within five weeks a record for celerity. And now the city is struggling with a motor stealing trust that is proving one of the hardest problems the police have ever been called upon to meet. As a matter of fact, a large part of all the gun men, confidence men, burglars, ex-convicts and other expert thieves of the nation have turned their attention lately to stealing automobiles, and have made Chicago the center from which they work. This city is particularly favored because the thief can get his stolen car across a state line in so short a time. So bold and successful had the auto thieves become that the entire time of one of Hoyne's assistant state's attor- neys is now being taken up with these cases and two additional detective sergeants from the bureau are daily assigned to auto work. Because of this activity twenty-five indictments have recently been returned and the motor thieves are now on trial. Sixty cases are now pending and fifty convictions have been obtained since January 1, most of them to the penitentiary. As a result .the number of cars stolen has very greatly decreased. If your car has disappeared in the last year it is probable that it was taken by some one of the following thieves, for they are the heads of the trust: Jack Almony alias "Red Jack," Bennie Klieman alias "Nemo," Walter Furniss, Earl Dear, Ed Tennigkite alias "Tenny," Frankie Burns, Frank Parker, Earl Harris and Ed Arn- heim. Jack Almony and Earl Dear are ex-gun men, against whom a number of cases for robbery with a gun have been pending at various times in the criminal courts, and these two, together with Walter Furniss and Bennie Klieman, are probably the most expert automo- bile thieves that ever worked in the city of Chicago. The work of the auto thieves has been systematized. The theft of a car is no haphazard matter. Your car, let us say, has been picked out for appropriation. You are followed and watched. It is ascer- tained that you are very careful about the car at all times except for the few minutes in which you go into your bank, or eat luncheon, or take a glance at the stock market quotations. The moment is dis- covered when your machine may be made away with with the least trouble and the smallest chance of interference. Then, some day, the car is gone. In every gang there is one expert mechanic, a man who generally Thirty-one has worked for a considerable period of time in one of the large automobile factories of the country. This man is familiar with every identification number in almost every automobile, and when a car is stolen, it is generally run into some private garage where the expert mechanic changes all the numbers. After the numbers on your car have been changed it is driven across the state line, placed in some fence's garage usually a public one doing, to all appearances, a legitimate business and later sold. The salesmen are usually confidence men with long police records. Among the celebrated stolen auto salesmen who have operated on Chicago cars in the last year are Louis M. Erb, Walter E. Relihan and Frank Miller. The great difficulty in these auto stealing cases is the identification of the car. So cleverly do the thieves change the stolen autos that the owners are often unable to identify them. Every car owner should make a point o'f establishing certain private marks on his machine that the thieves would overlook and which would enable him to satisfy a jury as to his ownership. Jack Almony was formerly a court reporter and it was through him the trust was able to make a study of the problem of legal identification of cars. State's Attorney Hoyne is now organizing a special automobile department so that the prosecutor and others on the staff will be experts in automobile identi- fication. Hoyne has also made a fight against the practice of letting these high class criminals out on small bonds which they are glad to forfeit. Earl Dear, as a result of this policy, is now in the county jail under* a bond demand of $57,000 which he cannot supply. That Chicago has been regarded as the center of operations is shown by the fact that among those under indictment are the three Whitehead brothers, who live in -Birmingham, Ala. Among the im- portant cases pending are those against Major William R. Stiles and his wife, Elvina E. Stiles. Mrs. Stiles was a bondswoman and came in contact with Jack Almony, Earl Dear and other leaders who induced her to sell their cars. An interesting conviction was that of Louis B. Krampe, who was' supposed to operate a barber agency on Fifth Avenue. He was not a member of the trust. His method was to hire small boys to steal small cars and to sell the vehicles through the want ad department of the daily papers. This was the first conviction of a receiver of stolen automobiles secured in Chicago in a number of years. A very important branch of the trust is said to be operating under the direction of a former Chicago policeman named Buckmin- ster. This man was not long ago indicted as a wiretapper and a case against him for arson is now in the supreme court. The greatest fence in the automobile stealing world is said to be Ira Bond of Minneapolis, a "millionaire-broker." He is supposed to have been a member of the old Mayberry gang, notorious swindlers. His operations are almost a by-word in the Northwest. Hoyne has Thirty-tun, Is Thirty- three at last succeeded in securing" an indictment against this prince of re- ceivers and it looks now as if his criminal career was over. The sentence of death recently passed upon Lloyd Bopp for the killing of Herman Malow, a motorcycle policeman of Oak Park, re- calls the exploits of the Wehb gang of auto bandits. Bopp was in a stolen motor at the time and his chauffeur was Frank McErlane, alias Walter Scott, who was "Teddy" Webb's driver on the bandit cruises that terrorized the city in the summer and autumn of 1912. When the other bandits, Robert Webb, James Perry, George Connery and Claude Rose, were sent to the penitentiary some foolish idea of mercy allowed McErlane to go to Pontiac, when he was recently paroled. The nightly exploits of the Webb bandits have almost been for- gotten by the public. The darkening hours of December 3d and 6th, 1912, however, were made memorable to the authorities. On the first of these nights the bandits smashed in five large jewelry store windows on the north side and succeeded in collecting about $1,800 worth of plunder. At 667 North Clark Street they passed a group of policemen and opened fire on the officers just to let them know r that the car carried the famous auto gang. On the way downtown Officer Fred Sticken stepped on the running board of the motor to place them under arrest for speeding. They opened fire' on the officer, one bullet taking effect in his body. They threw him off the machine and continued snooting at him as he lay in the street. Three nights later they held up four stores and shot two persons, all within a half an hour. While they were at work in the bakery of Margaret Glaser they shot at a citizen who was so unfortunate as to come in for a loaf of bread. Ten minutes later they drilled C. A. Sherman,, 312 East Garfield Boulevard, through the breast when he refused to open his. cash register. Ten days later Hoyne's officers at last got on the track of the bandits and Perry and McErlane were captured. Webb, who was with them, escaped. The proceeds of fifty burglaries and hold-ups were found. On January 20, 1913, Detective Peter Hart was sent to 1617 Wabash Avenue, where Webb was believed to be hiding. Webb killed the detective and escaped over the roofs. He was caught later, however, and is now doing a life sentence at Joliet. The most interesting thing about the other gang of auto bandits, that which included Eddie Alack, the notorious pickpocket ; Harry Kramer; Charlie Kramer, alias "Big Polly"; Alex Brodie and Bennie Feine was the rapidity of their transit to the penitentiary following their removal of $15,000 from the Washington Park bank. At 8 o'clock on the morning of January 27, 1916, they entered the bank in true western style and got away with the plunder. All of the gang but Eddie Mack were New Yorkers who had come out to grow up with the country and show the tank town real metropolitan methods. Hoyne felt that such a gang should be eradicated at once. Forty- Thirty-four eight hours after the hold-up the bandits were arrested and on Febru- ary 10 they were placed on trial. On March 4 a verdict of guilty was brought in and two days later they took up a life residence at Joliet. Hoyne and the police were praised for this work, but the state's attorney received even greater praise when he succeeded in getting a court of law to accept his theory that an automobile, in the hands of a reckless and brutal driver, should be regarded as an instrument of murder and classed with the revolver, stiletto and poison phial. These two convictions established a world's precedent and helped to cut down the number of brutal killings by motor car. Lawrence Lindbloom was put on trial April 30, 1913, for the mur- der of Joseph Weiss, whom he had run over on Cottage Grove Avenue at East Twenty-fifth Street. Lindbloom was driving at thirty-five miles an hour. Weiss was caught in the machinery and dragged more than two blocks in fact, the chauffeur only stopped an^l gave himself up because the mangled form had brought the car to a stop and Lind- bloom coud make it go no further. On the jury that convicted Lind- bloom were four automobile owners. 'The second conviction was of Fred Hrodek, who had run over Patrick J. Condon in Austin en the night of March 20, 1913. As in the other case, the body was^, caught in the machinery of the car and Hrodek drove several blocks in an effort to escape, but was captured, in effect, by his victim. When several bystanders suggested that the car be turned over so that the body could be liberated, Hrodek angrily de- manded: "What good'll that do? He's dead, ain't he? You can't turn this car over and smash it all up." Hrodek was given a fourteen- year sentence. At the time of these convictions the Chicago Record Herald said in comment :' "For the first time in the history of Illinois a man was convicted yesterday of murder with an automobile. His punishment was fixed at fourteen years in the penitentiary." The Chicago Daily News also said: "Vicious driving of automobiles in Chicago is a scandal as well as an embarrassment and a peril to law-abiding and considerate owners of motor cars. It is high time that killings by reckless drivers of motor vehicles should be recognized as grave crimes to be punished by peni- tentiary terms." The necessity for such convictions as this is shown by the following table, giving the principal causes of sudden death in Chicago in 1915: Suicide . 671 Miscellaneous falls 261 Automobiles 254 Railroad 239 Homicide 232 Industrial 228 Thirty-live Asphyxiation . . ^19 Burns and scalds 193 Street car . . 139 In the year 1905 there were only five killings by automobile. In eight months of 1916 there have been 166 killings. CHAPTER IX In Which the Most Powerful of All Trusts Is Broken Up and Property and Labor Together Are Freed from Extortion and Abuse AT THE TIME the fourteen robber barons of the plate glass smashing trust were convicted last July, there was naturally an effort on the part of the defendants to make the affair a persecution of union labor, for the thugs and blackmailers on trial had gained control of the union organization as the best means of further- ing their purpose and of enriching their own personal pockets. But the persecution idea did not go very far, principally, I believe, because the union members themselves had suffered the most and had gained the least. The best proof that union labor in general approved the conviction is shown, to my mind, by the fact that, of the trial jury, three men were at the time members of Chicago unions and several lot" the others had in the past been members. As for Hoyne himself he had originated and carried through in the public interest the whole campaign that led to the convictions his personal and public record made him safe. Union leaders and union men both knew him as the friend of organized labor. I can only add my little bit to the general opinion on this point by reprint- ing a remark of his, made at the time he acted as the labor member of the board of arbitration in the street car strike, which gave the men the best award ever received in a Chicago labor controversy. "Under modern industrial conditions/' he said, "unionism is the only support of a living wage, and upon the principle of unionism depends the comfort, welfare, happiness and opportunity of thou- sands of families mothers, wives and children of workers." The Chicago Herald, appreciating the situation, said in an editorial of December 6, 1915: "With the indictment of fifty-four men on numerous counts as a result of the long investigation into certain labor conditions in this city, the necessity of restating and for keeping the real issue clearly in mind again arises. Already there is evidence of a desire to becloud the issue and represent the natural and orderly process of the law as an attack on union labor. "The point at issue and the only point at issue is whether these Thirty-six' men are guilty as charged. The grand jury, after hearing the evi- dence against them, found it sufficiently impressive to justify indict- ments. The state's attorney, whose interests are certainly not bound up in the injury of union labor, announces his intention to press the prosecution. The defendants will enjoy the benefit of every legal pre- sumption and every legal safeguard. The only advantage they will be compelled to surrender is the privilege of associating union labor with them in the box as a defendant. "It is stated that union labor all over the country will watch the trials of the men indicted very closely. Union labor should. Union labor has a special interest in the punishment of any fraud and corruption on the part of its representatives that may be shown to cixst. Of all the suf- ferers from the graft and extortion of so-called 'labor representatives' union labor suffers most. It may be taken for granted that every decent union mati realizes this fact clearly." The glass smashers had a hold on the life of the cuy such as no other criminal organization ever secured. With the wire-tappers and others, the victims often fell into the trap, partly or wholly, because they had themselves been susceptible to a dishonest suggestion. In other lines the victims had been individuals, more or less helpless. But to the glass smashing barons all persons or corporations that built houses or lived in them had to pay tribute. No business concern was strong enough to escape. The system employed by the plate glass barons was simple and direct. These so-called business agents within the painters district council and affiliated organizations, met regularly twice a week to put new names on the black list or take old ones off. This list was sent three times a week to all the glass houses. Suppose you owned a business building. It wouldn't make much difference where, it was, so long as it was south of Waukegan, north of Chicago Heights or east of Western Springs, but the Chicago loop district was the favorite hunting ground. Some one of the robber barons would take a look at your building or at you and decide that you would make an eligible party to go on the black list. On it your building would go at the next meeting. In a day or two "Lusher" Hipp or "Dutch" Klems or "Muckles" Shields or Joseph Casey or Jim AlcCullongh or "Ronehead" Clayton or "Fuzzy" Fussy or Jack Miller or Tom Flanigan or "Smash" Hanson or Charley Gibbard or Ed Hammond or Elmer L. Hitt or some other one of the window wreckers would get an order to drop in at your place and wreck the lights. In the earlier days of the trust, the ruffian detailed for the work would have hurled a brick or a pop bottle or a stone through your window and there would have been a big crash and the necessity for a hasty and unseemly flight. But by the time you got into trouble the plan had become more nearly perfect. The man who was working for you on your windows would have dropped in at your place in an automobile, and he would have had a specially constructed slingshot. He would havj loaded this with an iron nut bound round with electricians' Thirty-seven tape and fired it through your plate from a safe distance and with a minimum of noise. No glass would have been strong enough to with- stand the shot either. Next morning your tenant would call you up and say: ''Someone has smashed my show window. What're you going to do about it?" "Have the insurance company make good with a new glass, of course," you would reply. Then you would call up the insurance company and the insurance company would call up the plate glass company and say: "\Ye want you to set a new show window in the building." "Sorry," the glass man would reply, " but we can't do it. The place is on the black list." Then you would fuss around a while and your tenant would fuss a good deal more and finally you would get the glass company to tell you what to do about it and the glass company would probably tell you to wander over^to Johnson's saloon and see if you could find a business agent there. At Johnson's saloon, sure enough, you would find a business agent and he would take you up into the balcony and call you names and tell you that you had been fined $10 or $1,000, according to your rating in the trust's private Bradstreet. After you had thus purified yourself and departed, the cashier of the trust would notify the central office that you had been declared fair, the business agent of the glaziers' union would notify the glass company that you were fair, and by the time you got home you would probably find the men at work". Much the same methods obtained with new construction and the remodeling of old buildings. It was always necessary to board up a building until a settlement had been made. The glass companies denied strenuously that they had any agreement with the glass smashers but it is certain they had nothing to lose by the frequent replacing of windows that might otherwise not have broken for years. It is impossible to say to what figure property was bled. But the sum was great, as the following enumeration for nine months will show : Known losses to plate glass insurance companies between January, 1915, and October, 1915. ...$ 6,272 Estimated losses for same period 25,000 Known extortions for same period 11,980 Estimated extortions for same period 50,000 Losses caused and damage done on account of black list while the same was in operation for about three years prior to October, 1915, includ- ing the dynamiting of Andrew Wash's house ($1,500), driving Kloepfel into bankruptcy ($7,500), driving Kronenberger out of business ($5,000), tenants' losses, owners' losses, contract- ors' losses, workmen's losses Impossible to es- timate, but con- servatively $150.- Thirty-eight 000 to $200,000. Extortions for the same period -. Also impossible . to estimate, but c o n s e rvatively the same as above, if not more. The situation can be grasped when* it is known that the authori- ties found between four and five hundred places on the various black lists obtained since October, 1915, and that out of these were inves- tigated less than half. The innocent victims of this system also numbered thousands within the ranks of the unions themselves. They had to sit by idle for weeks at a time because of the hundreds of strikes the grafters called for the purpose of shaking money into their own personal pockets. The privates in the union ranks, of course, had no way of knowing that the strikes from which they suffered were unjustified and were not called in their interest. As a result of Hoyne's crusade Fred Mader and Charles Crowley, respectively business agent and assistant business agent of the fixture hangers' organization, were sent to state's prison for three years. Hugo Hahn and Walter E. Staley, business agents of the glaziers' union, and Ray Stewart, business agent of the wood finishers' union, we.re sent for two years, and Frank Curran, one of the business agents of the painters' district council, for one year. John E. Cleary, former business agent of the electrical workers' union ; Isadore Gordon, business agent of the painters' council ; Harry H. Grass, former business agent of the same body, and William E. Nestor, another of its retired business agents, were each fined $2,000. Charles Hansen, of one of the painters' locals, was fined $1,500; Nicholas Pekelsma, another of the district council's business agents, was fined $750; and John W. Murphy, assistant business agent of the electricians, and George Tuckbreiter, another business agent of the council, were each assessed $500. Windows in Chicago are seldom broken now except by accident. CHAPTER X The Gunmen Discussing the Crimes of Violence That Have Made Chicago (In) famous With a List of Some Important Convictions TO PERSONS unacquainted with the appalling amount of crime in Chicago it seems incredible that since the first of 1913 there have been 284 men sent to Joliet, Chester and Pontiac for the crime of "robbery with a gun." Of these, seventy-nine were sentenced to the reformatory because of their youth and lack of criminal record. But the more than 200 remaining were nearly all hardened Thirty-nine gun men. Many of them had been committing serious offenses against the law for years 'and had escaped with, at most, a few months in the reformatory. The serious problem of gun-toting receives the attention of Judge Marcus Kavanagh in an address, reprinted in the Chicago Examiner of April 27, 1914, under th headline, "Judge Kavanagh demands public support for Hoyne's anti-gunmen campaign." Among other things the judge said : "The carrying of arms is mainly responsible for the frightful mortality shown by the criminal records of our courts. Gun carry- ing is the principal reason why prison population in the United States has steadily increased since 1850, while in every other civilized country in the world it has decreased each decade. The people of the United States are asleep, and until they wake up their servants will be asleep. The judges should wake up here in Chicago and support the state's attorney, and the public should insist that every branch of government give him support." That there was a general public suspicion that the criminal coterie in the detective bureau was protecting the gun men is shown by the newspapers of that time. The Examiner on April 19, 1914, headlined : "Hoyne forces police to do their duty, and arrests gunmen." The Herald, in an editorial of the 19th, printed this sen- tence: "Mr. Hoyne is to be commended for his attitude in endeavor- ing to compel the police to drive out the gunmen." And the Ameri- can on April 20th used this caption: "Hoyne causes twenty- four raid squads to begin ridding the city of gunmen." Of the. gun men sent over the road in 1913, 1914, 1915 and the first half of the present year, 180 went to the state penitentiary at Joliet, twenty-five to the penitentiary at Chester and seventy-nine to the reformatory at Pontiac. A sketch of the criminal career of two or three of them will serve to introduce the whole crew. James Clark, William Hogan and Frederick J. Corrigan, on Sep- tember 21, 1914, drove up in an automobile to the Franklin Park State Bank, entered the bank and covered the cashier, Walter Joss, with their revolvers. When Joss made an effort to reach his own weapon Clark shot him through the right lung and the trio fled without getting any money. Clark's record is as follows: On December 21, 1903, as Frank Meyer, he was sentenced to the house of correction for burglary. On June 4, 1904, as Albert Kashellek, a charge of robbery was stricken off. On January 24, 1905, as Albert Kashelek, sentenced to Pontiac for burglary. On July 10, 1908, paroled. On April 14, 1909, discharged. On November 21, 1909, with an unknown confederate, held up the saloon of J. B. Jorgenson, 4400 West Madison street, and shot and killed William Belden, a customer. Was held by the coroner without bail. In the December term of the grand jury one Forty of several charges of robbery against him -was no-billed. On Jan- uary 21, 1910, he was found not guilty of another robbery charge. On April 9, 1910, he was sentenced to Joliet for a term of from one year to life on two charges of robbery. On May 6, 1914, he was paroled. The following September found him attempting the Frank- lin Park job, which led to his return to the penitentiary, where he is now likely to remain. William Hogan had a similar career. On December 15, 1905, as William Ziek, he was sentenced to Pontiac on a charge of rob- bery and assault to kill. On March 31, 1909, he was paroled. On November 12, 1909, he was discharged. On December 16, 1910, a charge against him of robbery was no-billed. On March 30, 1911, he was sentenced to Joliet fgr from one year to life on a charge of robbery. On March 25, 1914, he was paroled. On September 6, 1914, he held up Fred C. Blanchard in the latter's saloon, and on the 18th held up Nathan Marshall's saloon. On the 21st we find him at Franklin Park, almost as busy as a Chautauqua lecturer. Corrigan's only other crime of record was a successful piece of njghwaymanry, performed in company with one Seth Piper. The two lay in wait for Warrington McAvoy, a messenger for the Gar- rield Park Bank, struck him over the head from behind, and ran away in an automobile with a satchel containing $4,100 in currency and $14,000 in checks. The checks were later found in a vacant lot, but the money was not recovered. Such records as these are rather discouraging to the reformatory system. It did not reform and the parol gave the outlaws addi- tional chances for crime. In an effort to arouse the readers of this book to a realization of the activity of the criminal population the following list of convictions is printed. The list includes only a very few of the hundreds of convictions ; only those which, by reason of their novelty or heinousness, or the importance of the criminal or his victim, attracted exceptional public attention. No one mentioned elsewhere in the book is included here. Though twenty-four cases are given, the list does not go back even to the beginning of Hoyne's administration : WILLIAM F. STINE conspiracy: Ex-police officer. Head of police organization. Embezzled portion of $66,000 secret police slush fund. E. J. Dodd, president of association and involved in same charges, was not indicted because of statute of limitations. "EDDIE" HICKS confidence game: Notorious "con" man and king of shell game artists. Inveigled victims by claiming author- ity and ability to sell submarines to Canada. HENRY BARRETT and EDWARD BARRETT manslaugh- ter: The famous -Barrett brothers, notorious sluggers, who killed a pal, Henry Masterson, in a quarrel about a woman. JAMES C. FRANCHE murder: Notorious criminal known as Forty-one "Duffy the Goat." Convicted of killing Isaac Henagow at a noto- rious redlight hangout. Police attempted to cover up crime, but Hoyne uncovered the plot and secured the evidence upon which the conviction was obtained. Jury fixed punishment at death. New trial granted. ROSWELL C. SMITH murder: Sentenced to death for mur- der of a four-year-old girl. Hanged February, 1914. EDWARD A. JONES conspiracy: An attorney, convicted for "fixing" witnesses and sending them out of the state. ADOLPH J. SCHMIDT forgery : An employee of the Stock Yards State Bank, who passed a forged check on the Fort Dearborn National Bank for $7,500 and fled to England. Brought back from Bristol, England. IKE BOND murder: Given life sentence for murder of Ida Leegson, Art Institute sculpturess. SEYMOUR R. SIMPSON conspiracy: Deputy sealer of the city of Chicago, convicted for "shaking down" peddlars while work- ing for the city. RUSSELL THOMPSON larceny: Notorious burglar and associate of the equally notorious Melville Reeves. MICHAEL and NATHAN HOCKMAN conspiracy : Con- victed of forging Sperry-Hntchinson green trading stamps and defrauding merchants who purchased them. JAMES CONWAY and LILLIAN CON WAY murder : Fa- mous circus clown and actor, convicted with wife of killing well known girl from Baltimore in a boarding house on Indiana' Avenue. WILLIAM CHENEY ELLIS murder : Prominent Cincinnati merchant. Murdered his wife in the Hotel Sherman by strangula- tion and cutting her throat. RUSSELL PETHICK murder: Grocery clerk and wagon driver, who killed Mrs. Coppersmith and child. JACK KOETTERS murder : Known as "Handsome ' Jack" and "Hammer man." Convicted of killing- the aged Emma Kraft in Saratoga Hotel. Eluded police for many years. Finally caught in San Francisco. VINCENZO CIOLLARA manslaughter: Son of a judge in a high court in Italy. Man of mystery. Refused to talk from the time of arrest until sentenced for life to the penitentiary. PAUL BRENCATO murder: Completely severed head of Joseph Minella, his associate and colleague. STANLEY STACK and SAMUEL MALRICK murder and robbery: Robbed and killed banker J. J. Slomski. Sentenced to i penitentiary for life. Forty-two 1. "Big Jack" Strosnider, head of the wiretappers" trust. Most ingenious of all swindlers and jail evaders, he is now in Joliet after twenty years of criminal liberty. He once tricked President McKinley into pardoning him. 2. Edward Jackson, known everywhere as "Eddie the Immune," be- cause no one could send him to prison. Convicted head of the pickpocket trust. 3. "Handsome Jack" Koetter. To get her money, induced elderly Emma Kraft to elope with him and then beat out her brains with a ham- mer. 4. Bennie Fein, one of the Washington Park State Bank robbers. Though only twenty-three years old Bennie had already been arrested fourteen times. 5 and 6. "Big Polly" and Harry Kramer, of the Washing- ton Park gan:r. Forty-three CHAPTER XI Parasite Trust Discussing the Hyenas of Crime and Their Dispersal NO CLASS of criminal incites more contempt than the paras.:e. One may look with some respect upon the burglar or the gun man, for their vocation calls for courage. But the parasite preys upon the helpless. They may be classed in general as jury fixers, crooked lawyers and leaches who fasten themselves upon the mentally unfit. The criminal court building in Chicago at one time blossomed like a rose garden with these despicable crooks if roses and so ill-favored a blossom can have any ground of similitude. It is pleasant to report, however, that the parasites have found hard living in the last several years and have now largely lost their organization and, for the time being at least, their power for evil. When Hoyne assumed office he found a body of professional fixers, whose stock in trade consisted principally of the credulity of their victims. Close watch was kept by the fixers on the grand jury com- mitments in the criminal branches of the municipal court and they wasted as little time in reaching the intended victims as the ambulance chasing shyster in personal injury cases. For a stated sum, paid in advance, the professional fixer would pretend to fix the state's attor- ney so that no indictment should result. If the evidence presented to the grand jury was insufficient to warrant an indictment, the fixer reported his success to his victim. If the indictment was returned, the victim was assured that the fixing would be done at the trial. If a conviction resulted the fixer sometimes, but not often, returned the dupe's money. There also existed a smaller, yet more dangerous, class of fixers known as jury-bribers. Their object was to free, for compensation, desperate criminals whose guilt was known. "Slicky" McMahon, "Bob" Malone and Attorney Lewis E. Dickinson, in the second year of Hoyne's administration, were indicted as jury-bribers, tried and sentenced to the penitentiary. These men both bribed jurors and furnished evidence on contract. Upon an indictment being rendered the leaders of the gang would wait upon the man about to be tried and offer to supply him with witnesses and evidence for the defense. For a case where jurors were to be bribed and affidavits and other evidence furnished a charge of about $500 would be made. The more serious the offense charged, of course, the higher the fee. The jury bribers convicted at one time included in their gang the clerk of one of the courts. The acquittal of several murderers is charged to them. Forty-four Since the conviction of the leaders in this form of crime, however, the small fry have realized that a new order of things exists in the criminal court building and have sought other fields for their talent. Jury bribing has now been rendered doubly difficult by the inauguration of a system that weeds out all men from the venire who might be regarded as in co-operation with the criminals or susceptible to bribery. A staff of investigators is always at work, often aided by private detective agencies. The people of Chicago and Cook County are today assured of more reliable juries than ever before. A startling trade at one time existed in the property of the mentally unsound. It found its headquarters in the county and probate courts. By inquiry it was possible to learn the financial condition of those who were committed to the hospital for the insane. Many of these were without relatives or interested friends and in such a case these unscrupulous leaches promptly filed a petition in the probate court and secured their own appointment as conservator, empowering them to take charge of the property of the unfortunate. The results of this practice can readily be imagined ; often the savings of a lifetime were dissipated or legally involved in such a manner that the owner was deprived of their use. The state's attorney's office has now, however, brought about co- operation between the two courts, and an assistant state's attorney has been assigned to attend all hearings. This arrangement leads to the appointment of a proper conservator and makes available expert advice as to the management of the estate. The importance of this reform is shown by the fact that in 1913 only 2,510 persons were passed upon as to their sanity while, if the present rate is maintained throughout the year, more than 3,500 insanity' petitions will have been heard in 1916. This is an increase of more than thirty per cent. Yearly the machinery for handling the insane is becomming of more importance to the public. Another phase of parasitical activity was much less criminal, but at the same time had a decidedly demoralizing effect. This was the practice of favored attorneys. If certain lawyers have special privileges in the state's attorney's jurisdiction it gives them a powerful advantage over other lawyers not having such privileges, and thus disturbs the natural and equitable distribution of professional business. This form of abuse in the last few years had become notorious. As the general body of legal practitioners in Chicago and the county towns was the first to suffer from the existence of this form of special privilege, so the lawyers have been the first to note its dis- appearance and to thank the present state's attorney therefor. The public can depend upon it that under the present administration there is no necessity of hiring this or that lawyer because he is known 'to have the ear of the prosecuting official and his assistants. As a sign of it* approbation the bar association has always strongly endorsed lloyne. Forty-five CHAPTER XII Moron, Juvenile and Sex Criminal In Which Widely Differing Views are Expressed as to the Moron, and Improvement is Noted in the Handling of Juvenile and Sex Cases {{TF THE POLICE were given authority to arrest every queer appearing person who looked like a moron, do you think you would be safe?" This question was fired at me the other morning in the criminal court building. Two authorities were at it hot and heavy on the problem of the half-wit criminal and what should be done with him. Neither of the authorities had an idea in common. Their atti- tude, in fact, represented the attitude of the general public and their difference showed the difficulty of reaching any solution of the prob- lem. It is one thing to talk of the poor "defective" and how he should be placed in a non-penal institution, instead of punished, and quite another thing to ascertain whether he is really defective, and if so, to adjust the administration of justice to the thousand and one new obstacles which such a plan encounters. "What we need," said one of my disputants, a judge on the criminal bench, "is educated policemen. We need scientific policemen who can detect queer persons when they are seen and take them to a central clinic, which should be established in conjunction with the police department, the municipal court and the county court. The chief of police is willing to help, t>ut he does not wish to take the entire responsibility of arresting people and depriving them of their liberty because they look queer." "Go on !" exclaimed his opponent, one of our well-known alienists ; "a man has a constitutional right to look queer. Besides, if the police were given power to pick up any one looking like a moron, half-wit or other unfortunate, some of our most noted physicians, surgeons, bank- ers, brokers, editors in fact, half the population would have to flee the country for safety. Point out some sane man on the street and whisper to a friend that he is on the border line, and in two days the gossips will have him in the mad house or branded as a dangerous citizen." "My dear doctor," said the first, "you are all wrong. The efforts put forth to find the right solution to the feeble-minded question are the most humanitarian I have ever known. They are conceived in sympathy." To which the other replied: "It is the most remarkable coincidence that this whole scheme is favored, encouraged, fostered and developed by two extremes in society on the one hand by those well meaning and eminently Forty-six respectable social workers, psychologists and alienists who honestly believe they have discovered a great science for the benefit of society, and on the other hand by the thieves, thugs, grafters, crooks, con- fidence men, robbers and murderers, who, in the last two years, have profited by the system, and whose agents have disguised their vicious purpose and with subtle ingenuity have crept into the conferences for civic reform and helped the thing along. The time is not far distant when the stench from this scheme, with its protection for crooks, excuses for crime, disrespect for laws, demoralization of justice, and breeding of criminals, will smell to Heaven, and merit an investigation and prosecution." The attitude of certain well-meaning people and organizations toward the criminal because of his supposed mental defectiveness, has raised many new problems, not only in the work of securing convic- tions of criminals, but in dealing with the criminal otherwise. Within the last two years, since the establishment of the boys' court, commissions have been appointed by courts and societies to study the relation of so-called mental defectiveness to crime, and devise plans for the segregation of the feeble-minded. Whenever any sensational murder like that of Ella Coppersmith, Agnes Middleton or Henry Mclntyre is committed, a new agitation is started with columns in the newspapers on the "irresponsible" criminal. Notice is served on all criminals that there is a new excuse for murder. Nothing is said about punishment. All one hears is "He was a defective ; we must do something with these defectives." Doctor Krohn, a recognized authority on the subject of diseased minds and crime, put the commission to thinking when he said, "The first step towards the solution of the problem is the enforcement of the laws. Too many men and boys, arrested for crimes which they deliber- ately planned, are excused on the plea of 'something wrong in the head.' Always excusing crime makes a pathological pensonality of a boy who, at the outset of his criminal career, was normal in every mental attribute, and would have remained normal but for these excus- ing agencies." One of the commissions appointed by the county court, outlines two courses of action : "Ask the legislature to provide farm colonies for feeble-minded and half-wits of Chicago, near Chicago, and set aside a large appropriation annually in Chicago not less than $1,000.- 000 with which to make a scientific survey of the situation on the part of both, the police and the health authorities. The machinery of the county court is placed at the disposal of the police who are urged to round up all paranoiacs, morons and half-wits, and bring them before the court." The official most concerned with the new problem is the public prosecutor. It is easy for a judge or a jury out of sympathy, senti- ment or error, to turn a criminal loose, but the prosecutor charged Fortv-seven specially with the duty of protecting . society, feels constantly the responsibility of seeing that the criminal, 'chiefly for. the,, deterrent effect it will ha-ve upon others, should be punished. He is sometimes blamed in a certain case for not .securing a conviction. If his failure to convict is+due to a new agency for excusing the criminal, he of all persons, is most interested in ascertaining whether or not that agency is one for the good of society. In dealing with criminals for thousands of years the different governments of the world have proceeded upon the theory that the; chief object of punishing is to deter others, but the new conception seems to be that if we punish at all' it is only for .the purpose , of reforming. With many of our courts taking a sentimental attitude toward the criminal, it is easy to see how the criminal himself, after being given the benefit of leniency, becomes encouraged to commit- other crimes, and those who see and hear what goes on in the court room are also encouraged. It is easy, also, to see how both the criminal and the would-be criminal lose respect for the law, and naturally drift toward criminal life. The 'plan for dealing with half-wits, in the opinion of State's Attor- ney Hoyne, must depend, in large measure, on the conclusions the law makers reach as to the correctness of the methods to determine who-: are half-wits and the number that will have to be dealt with. -If the old law on responsibility for crime continues to be the law- that is", if the criminal is to be held responsible for his acts so long as he knows the distinction between right and wrong there will be little need for any farm colonies. If, on the other hand, the psycopathic laboratory moron idea is to prevail and become the law, we may prepare for the seggregation of a large part of our population who are now law abiding citizens, and establish enough institutions or farm colonies to accom- modate them. Those who advocate this new reform, must prove first that Chicago is "swarming with half-wits"; second, that the half-wits are dangerous and should be seggregated from the. rest of society; third, that the methods now efriployed -to determine half-wittidness are correct.- Until this is proved the penitentiary, the insane asylum and the institution at Lincoln, with additions to meet a natural growing demand, are, in his opinion, sufficient. * * * Many readers of this booklet will be astonished to learn that in the last four years the juvenile court has tried "and disposed of 9,429 delinquent cases and 9,350 dependent cases. Such a volume of wrong doing and misfortune among the young condemns the parents of Chicago. If the homes of the city produce nearly 5,000 cases a year that get into court, how many thousand other cases are there of which we hear nothing? It is a pleasure to report that the work of this specialized court is improving. In 1913 the cases tried resulted in only 9% per cent of Forty-eight convictions. In 1916, of the last 124 cases presented to the grand jury, seventeen were no-billed, 103 true-billed, sixty-seven tried and in forty- eight cases a conviction was had, making a total of convictions of seventy-one per cent. State's Attorney Hoyne is responsible for tins improvement. Soon after coming into office he discovered that the staff of fifty-three police officers and eighty-one county probation officers was handling all these cases without any attorney to direct them. There was no definite plan of action from a legal standpoint. He put one of his assistants in charge of all juvenile work ; arranged to have all cases where a juvenile was complaining witness brought in the court of domestic relations, making it possible for one officer to do the work more systematically than four or five were then doing it; and put into the hands of another officer, for specialized effort, all cases that were held to the grand jury. Hoyne's object in these innovations was to permit a thorough investiga- tion of each and every case prosecuted in that court, realizing that without a systematic investigation by proper officers under a proper head an unfortunate child might later become a hardened criminal. The juvenile court now has about 125 officers assigned to districts. Their work is to make investigation of homes. In many cases young girls are found in houses of ill-fame or surrounded at home by evil conditions. These are brought to the court and a new home found for them or they are placed in a school. A child-placing depaitment finds work for girls and an officer keeps in close touch with ea. h case so placed. The same system is followed with boys, except that they are placed on farms through the state. The widows' pension now cares for all children where the father is dead or unable to work. * * * It is shocking to relate that not a month goes by in Chicago without the grand jury being called upon to dispose of- at least fifty-six sex cases in which the witnesses are young children. In this peculiarly difficult work Hoyne has wrought many improvements. In March, 1915, he established a social service department to handle all sex cases. It is in charge of Miss Laura Ebel, and Miss Frances Douglass manages the field work. Girls are no longer, as heretofore, compelled to relate their sex experiences to a man, usually an assistant state's attorney, a most unsatisfactory arrangement. One of the women in charge always appears in court with the child. The investigations are very broad and thorough. They are made for the purpose of showing fairness to the defendant as well as the prosecution. Many injustices have been avoided through these investigations and by a proper presentation of the evidence. Every effort is made toward a speedy trial. . Young children tend to forget such experiences and the idea is to allow them to go, forget as soon as possible. A comfortable rest room has been provided and children who are to appear as witnesses are kept here until called. Formerly they were compelled to sit in court and listen to evidence Forty-nine which at times was shockiug even to the most depraved. Where the investigation shows that a conviction could not be secured the child is not taken into court at all. That the children may not come in contact with the general run of witnesses in the criminal court build- ing, a special day has been set aside and designated as "Grand Jury Children's Day." CHAPTER XIII Unspectacular Crime In Which Improvement is Noted in the Punishment of Quasi-Criminal Offenders THE AVERAGE citizen has no idea as to the enormous amount of crime of the unspectacular sort. Violent crime attracts the attention because it is featured in the daily papers. But there are thousands upon thousands of cases that are never mentioned but which strike close to the homes of the people. Perhaps the most spectacular of the unspectacular cases in recent years was the failure of the La Salle Street Trust & Savings Bank and its subsidiaries. This case received very great notoriety because of the political prominence of the men involved. Otherwise it would have aroused only a fleeting interest outside the circle of depositors. The La Salle Street Trust & Savings failure was one of the most serious in modern banking history. The total losses were in the neighborhood of four million dollars. The victims were among the people of average means, and were over 20,000 in number. Many working people lost their entire savings of a lifetime, and numbers of widows, heirs and legatees had their entire estates swept away. As a result of the crash C. B. Munday, vice-president of the bank, was sentenced to the penitentiary. William Lorimer was acquitted by a jury. There is, as