II B RAR.Y OF THE UN IVLRSITY Of ILLINOIS 6Z\.3€5 IZG55te no.2-H cop.3 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/asymmetricallyex03hans THE ASYMMETRICALLY EXCITED SPHERICAL ANTENNA Contract No. AF33(616)-310 RDO No. R-112-110 SR-6f2 TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 3 by Robert C. Hansen Research Associate 30 April 1955 THE LIBRARY OF THE AUG 11 1955 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ANTENNA SECTION ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORY ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA. ILLINOIS IV TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont.) 1- The Experimental Facility 7.1 The Swing Frame Ground Screen 7.2 Control and Electronic Equipment 8 Conclusions Bibliography Appendix I. Calculation of the S m and T m Series Appendix II. A Short Summary of the Illiac Order Code Appendix III Series Involving Spherical Bessel Functions Appendix IV. Watson's Transformation Appendix V. The Z^ Calculation Appendix VI. The Associated Legendre Code Page 96 96 100 103 104 108 118 122 126 135 139 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure p age Num.be r 1 Spherical Coordinate System 5 2„ Cross Section of Antenna with Radial Line 14 3 Parallel Plate Region 15 4 Two Monopole Array 21 5 Sum by Rows 24 6 Sum by Columns 24 7 Real Part of S(m,a) 38 8 Imaginary Part of S(m,a) 38 9 Real Part of T(m,a) 39 10 Imaginary Part of T(m,a) 40 11 Real Part of Z m (ka) 41 12 Imaginary Part of Z^(ka) 42 13 Addition Theorem Coordinates 44 14 Theoretical Patterns for 0„ 4 Offset 49 15 Theoretical Patterns for 0.4 Offset 50 16 Theoretical Patterns for 0.4 Offset 51 17 Patterns for 1.0 Offset 52 18 Patterns for 1,0 Offset 53 19 Patterns for 1.0 Offset 54 20 Patterns for 1.0 Offset 55 21 Pattern as a Function of Offset 57 22 Pattern as a Function of Offset 58 V I ILLUSTRATIONS (Cont.) 23 Sector Dielectric Loading 66 24 Two Sector Guide 68 25 Radial Line with Twenty Sectors 71 26 Real Part of W m (ka) 73 27 Imaginary Part of W m (ka) 74 28 Real Part of W m (ka) 75 29 Imaginary Part of W m (ka) 76 30 Real Part of W m (ka) 77 31 Imaginary Part of W m (ka) 78 32 Real Part of W m (ka) 79 33 Cardioid Patterns of Spherical Antenna 87 34 Elevation Pattern of Spherical Antenna 88 35 Tchebyscheff T 5 Polynomial versus cp 92 36 Fan Beam Antenna Pattern 93 37 Elevation Pattern of Fan Beam Antenna 94 38 Fan Beam for Different Elevation Angles 95 39 Ground Screen from Above 97 40 Underside of Aperture 99 41 Equipment Racks 101 I 1 S m Block Diagram 111 III 1 Block Diagram 124 IV 1 Paths of Integration 128 VI 1 Block Diagram of NALP Code 141 V I I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is indebted to his adviser, Professor Edward C. Jordan, for his help and inspiration. He is also indebted to Dr. Cleve C. Nash who offered initial encouragement in graduate study, to Professor V. H. Rumsey and Dr. R. H. DuHamel of the Antenna Laboratory who made the work possible, to Lynn Yarbrough, who performed hand calculations, to Roger Trapp. who engineered the experimental ground screen, and lastly to his wife, Dorothy, for her patience and understanding. GLOSSARY OF SYMBOLS V I I I p m V 6(x) e n 'm X m m T fa) ?r 'Vim a a n a i Bm Eigenvalue of z equation, p. 15 Argument, p 131 Gap width, p. 23 Kronecker delta, p, 11 Dirac delta function, p. 19 Dielectric constant, p. 64 Neumann number, p. 11 Constant, p. 70 Intrinsic impedance, p. 5 Wavelength Permeability Complex zeroes, p. 129 Argument, p. 131 Coefficient, p„ 25 Transverse Scalar, p. 18 Unit vector in r direction Spherical coefficient, p. 7 Cylindrical coefficient, p. 16 Radius of sphere Coefficient, p. 29 Coefficient, p. 45 Spherical coefficient, p 7 Cylindrical coefficient, p. 16 IX GLOSSARY OF SYMBOLS (Cont. ) b n p. 29 b m Coefficient, p. 81 C nm Spherical coefficient, p. 7 C^ Cylindrical coefficient, p. 16 Cj^ Tchebyscheff coefficient, p. 89 c Radius of feed wire, p. 43 D nm Spherical coefficient, p, 7 D m Cylindrical coefficient, p. 16 d Offset, p. 44 E Electric field vector of (x,y,z,t) Eg Assumed gap field £ x (0,qp) Transverse vector mode function, p. 7 e Naperian base f Scalar mode function, p„ 6 g Scalar mode function, p. 6 H Magnetic field vector of (x,y,z,t) H Magnetic field vector of (x,y,z) h n ^'(kr) Spherical Hankel function of second kind, p. 6 H n ^ , '(kr) Hankel function of second kind, p. 6 Hoo Wire coefficient, p. 45 j -^T J m (kr) Bessel function of first kind, p. 25 k Propagation constant, p. 3 GLOSSARY OF SYMBOLS (Cont.) M N N m (kr) P n m (cos nm Rr (rh n )< S B F S(m, a) s 1 s 2 s m T(m, a) T 1 m T N (z) L n m 1 V^kr) I m Vector solution, p. 5 Eigenvalue of qp equation, p. 5 Start of summation, p. 24 Vector solution, p. 5 Eigenvalue of 9 equation, p, 5 Outward normal unit vector Bessel function of second kind, p. 25 >) Associated Legendre polynomial, p. 6 Poynting vector for (n,m)th. mode, p. 59 Radiation resistance, p. 60 Longitudinal derivative, p. 7 Spherical Bessel function Series, p. 24 Real Part, p„ 26 Imaginary part, p. 26 Series, p. 29 Series, p. 24 Series, p 29 Tchebyscheff polynomial, p„ 86 Normalizing factor, p. 11 Pattern function, p 81 Mode vol tage, p 7 Series, p 72 XI GLOSSARY OF SYMBOLS (Cont. ) V m (kr) Mode voltage, p. 18 z Unit z vector Z Bessel combination, p. 25 Z£ Wire coefficient, p. 43 1. INTRODUCTION The dipole antenna, one of the most useful and simplest of all an- tennas, has been and is still an object of interest to antenna theore- ticians. In all but the elementary geometrical shapes, this antenna poses a cryptic problem. Recently the fat stub antenna, a dipole or monopole whose transverse dimensions are comparable with the wavelength, has aroused some interest as a possible instrument for radiating energy over large azimuthal angles. By varying the shape and size of the mono- pole and by changing the feed geometry, wide variations in radiation patterns can be obtained. Electrically rotated search beams are another possibility as will be mentioned later. Spherical antennas have received much attention in the literature. Stratton and Chu^-'-'' and Schelkunof f ^' have treated the uniformly excited or rotationally symmetric case, finding solutions for the pattern and radiation conductance. A spherical surface with external wires has been studied by Feld'"^'. DuHamel'^' has treated a system of currents flowing on the sphere, from the point of view of synthesizing patterns. A novel continuation of Stratton and Chu's work has recently been made by Karr'^) ] who considers a sphere split along a circle of latitude not the equator, and uniformly excited. All of these, however, yield far field distri- butions that are invariable about the azimuthal angle and involve only a simple set of modes. (1) See numbered reference in the Bibliography. All other such numbers used throughout this manuscript also refer to numbered references in the Bibliography. 2 It is the purpose of this paper to examine in detail the most prosaic prototype of the fat stub antenna, the spherical dipole with asymmetric feed. One may think of this antenna as being made by taking a metallic sphere (hollow), removing a narrow strip of metal around the equator to divide the sphere into two hemispheres, and then applying an electric field in the narrow gap. If the electric field is a function of the azimuthal angle, then the excitation is said to be rotationally unsym- metric or just asymmetric. 2. THE GENERAL ANTENNA PROBLEM 2.1 Introduction In attempting exact solutions of antenna problems, Maxwell's equa- tions in differential or integral form are usually used as a starting point. The former are for a homogeneous and isotropic medium m 9E curl E = -u. — , curl H ■ e r-. (2-1) The divergence equations have been omitted. These equations are equiva- lent to the vector wave equation in E (or H) obtained by the elimination of H (or E) in Eq. 2-1 3 2 E - curl curl E + ^e — — = . (2-2) at It is often easier to deal with the vector Helmholtz equation obtained from Eq. 2=2 by assuming a monochromatic time dependence eJ wt : curl curl E + k*E = (2-3) where k = w [ie . A vector in space is determined by its three scalar components and clearly the problem would be immeasurably simplified if the solutions to the scalar Helmholtz equation, about which a great deal is known could some- how be used. Since Maxwell's curl equations include div E - 0, E can be written as a curl, i.e., as a solenoidal (transverse) vector. The latter is determined by two scalars only as the div E = condition imposes an additional linear relationship. In certain cases, the vector Helmholtz 4 solutions are found by taking the curl and curl curl, respectively, of a suitable unit vector times the scalar Helmholtz solutions. The cases in which this is possible are six: the six coordinate systems which are listed below^o). j n three other cases, (spheroidal coordinates and rotational parabolic coordinates) if the cp variation is absent, (m = 0) the vector equation can be reduced to a single scalar equation which can be solved. For other systems, solutions to the equation might be found but fitting the boundary conditions is almost impossible. The separable systems are: cartesian, with any axis the preferred (longitudinal) axis, spherical and conical, with the radius the preferred axis; circular, elliptic, and parabolic cylinder, with the z axis preferred.* Solution of the vector equation is then reduced to finding scalar solutions and operating on these scalar solutions to give the vector solutions. It is well known that the scalar Helmholtz equation can be solved in any co- ordinate system which allows separation of the partial differential equation into three ordinary differential equations, each depending on only one coordinate. There are eleven such systems^'' and the six systems mentioned above are among these eleven. 2 2 The Spherical Antenna The system of interest is the spherical coordinate system, since the boundary conditions are to be applied over a spherical surface. The orientation is shown in Fig. 1. If the scalar Helmholtz equation is written in the form V 2 f ♦ k 2 f - or V 2 g + k 2 g - 0, (2-4) Figure I. Spherical Coordinate System two independent vector solutions of Eq. 2-3 are given by (8) Mr = curl a rf, N_ = f- curl curl a rg _1 _x _g b _I (2-5) The components of these vector solutions along the coordinate axes are: N. M r " n(n + D< k I W J 91 N< r sin 9 3qp = JL % kr 3r39 N n - 1 9£ r 80 JL (2-6) kr sin 3r3cp For one set of fields let E = Mf; then H = j/r\ Nf with n, a wu./k = -T\jje The other set is taken as E - N„ and H = j/r\ M„. These are seen to be transverse electric and transverse magnetic, respectively. The scalar solution has two separation constants or eigenvalues n and m and is of the form g(r,9 f (p) = h(2)(kr) t^U^P^Ccos 9) cos mcp (2-7) + B nmUn m Pn m ( cos 9 > sin m( P^ or f(r,e,cp) - h(, 2 )(kr) [C nin U n in P n ,n (co S 9) cos mcp ! " D nm U n mp n m ( cos 9 ) sin m ^ > where h^^^kr) is a spherical Hankel function of the second kind, repre- senting an outward travelling wave; P m (cos 9) is the associated Legendre polynomial of degree n and order m. General references on spherical Bessel functions are Stratton' "' , and Erdelyi' ^' . For associated Legendre functions, see Hobson^*', Erdelyi^"^, MacRobert^^', and Whittaker and Watson'^"*) Excellent tables are given by the National Bureau of Standards^^, *•"'.. The spherical Hankel function is related to the more common cylindrical Hankel function by h n (2) (kr) . -2-^Vy 2 (kr) Ttk] (2 8) n n.kr That these functions are simple may be seen from the expressions for the first two, which are h <2)( x ) = ?i e -Jx h ,(2) (x) ■ z2 e jx (1 . J } 7XX Similarly the associated Legendre function is related to the ordinary I • "endre function by P n m(co. 9) - sin" 9 ^ P n (cOS 6) d (cos 9) m (2-9) U n ra is a normalizing factor which will be defined later. The transverse components of electric and magnetic field, called E T , ftp, can now be written in terms of vector normal mode functions e K (0,qp) and mode voltages V x (kr): h - Y_v* (kr) e K (0,
sin **] (2-15) where frhj' - f [rh^Ckr)] (2-16) or It can be shown that for TE modes, V'(kr) = *'V ' V(kr) (rh^ while for TM modes, V'(kr) -k 2 rh ? V(kr) 6 2.3 Evaluation of the Mode Voltages From the Uniqueness Theorem^ 1 ' ' for electromagnetic fields, the exterior field is completely specified by tangential E over the surface of the sphere, Over the conducting portion, the tangential electric field is zero. Thus, specifying tangential E over the gap or aperture uniquely determines the field outside the sphere. The basic method here is to assume a suitable distribution of E tan in the aperture, to express the external and internal fields in terms of the assumed distribution, and then to make the two forms for H tan agree at the gap. For a narrow gap, the actual distribution of electric field (except for the distribution with respect to qp) in the gap does not appear to affect the performance of a dipole antenna much. It will be assumed that the electric field in the gap does not vary with z, and that it has only a z component. For narrow equatorial gaps, E z - Eq. Broadly speaking, the external and internal fields are found in terms of the gap field by equating the assumed distribution to the general series form (Eq 2-10), multiplying both sides by one mode, integrating, and using the orthogonality of modes to reduce. This gives a result of the form V q (kr) - P^| (2-17) where q is one mode of x. This procedure will be followed in detail in the next few pages. Call the assumed gap field Eg = Eq(cp). A convenient method uses the Lorentz Reciprocity Theorem^ "''. This theorem relates two electromagnetic fields E 1 , Hi and E 2 , H 2 of the same frequency in space by an integral over the surface enclosing the source free region, G. / G Ei * H 2 -n dS = ^G?2 x Ht'n dS . (2-18) Here the region is taken as that enclosed by the antenna surface of radius a and a sphere of large radius r, r - * 00 . The fields must satisfy the radiation condition^^' at infinity Lim r[n * H + 1 E] = (2-19) r -oo - - n - Let the antenna surface be S x and the surface of large radius be S 2 . Then the integral of (Ei * H - E 2 x Hi ) over Si_ must equal that over S 2 . Now let r vary. Since the integral over Si has not changed, that over S 2 must also be a constant. If the limit of the integral over S 2 is taken as r-°°, and the radiation condition used, zero results. Thus, the constant value is zero. This leaves the integral over the surface of the antenna plus gap; however, due to the perfect conductivity of the sphere the integral over the gap surface, S, alone remains. Let the field corresponding to the assumed distribution of tangential E be subscripted 1, whereas that subscripted 2 will be one TE (or TM) 10 mode. The single mode field may be further split into even and odd terms because the sin mqp, cos mqp factors are orthogonal. H ± is unknown: thus, the general series expression (2-11) must be used^ u '. Four cases are to be considered and each case should yield one set of mode voltages. One of these cases will be examined in detail. Case 1 E 2 , H 2 are TM even. h = V mn£nm> H 2 = i V^ a r x e nm (2-20) with the fields being evaluated at r = a. The left hand side of Eq. 2-18 is 2 which reduces to . 2 ^ " ^ V nm C J e *pQ ^'fnm sin ed9d ^ (2-21) The right hand side of Eq 2 18 is R" 5 = a2 C ! o V nm4 !nm x Z Z (a r X !ji^r Vji sin edGdcp which simplifies to RHS " — V nm CC II V ji £jx £nm sin 9d0d * . (2-22) nk j j It is now possible to interchange the order of summation and inte- gration since the series of Eq. 2-22 is uniformly convergent in 9 and qp. 11 It will be shown that the vector mode functions are orthogonal: f o ; o^i°fnm dS = r 4 ; o V[U n P n mcos "»] "VtUj^cos i
The normalizing factor U_ m is defined as the square root of the normal ization factor for the associated Legendre polynomials and is U n m (2n + l)(n -m)! (2 _ 26) 2 (n + m) ! 12 This factor has been used because of convenience in the computer sub- routine for calculating the polynomials; this code will be discussed later. The result of these manipulations is RHS = — V V ' 2nn(n + 1) (2-27) -nh nnrnm P K£ - *•*■ ' MK fc m with the final form for the mode voltages Vnm(ka) = 2 rtn(n m r 1) ^W^ !e'!n m sin 0d ^ • (2-28) Case 2 The remaining cases are identical in result (Eq. 2-28). The differences appear when the values for the mode functions and voltages from Eqs= 2-12 through 2-15 are inserted in Eq. 2-28. To recapitulate, the electric and magnetic fields in the exterior region were written as a summation of mode functions and voltages in Eqs . 2-10,11, and the mode voltages have been found in terms of an assumed distribution of tangential E in the gap, Eq. 2-28. Next, the interior fields will be handled in a similar manner. 3. THE RADIAL LINE 3 I The Radial Line Exciter The spherical antenna of the last chapter was excited by an electric field distribution in the equatorial gap. It is the purpose of this sec- tion to consider methods of producing various voltage distributions in the gap. Since it is usually desirable to feed practical antennas with a coaxial cable whose diameter is small with respect to wavelength, some sort of transmission line or waveguide is needed to transform from the cable to the large diameter gap. A number of cables might be used to feed the gap directly but this is an unwieldy solution. Eiconical and parallel plate transmission lines appear to be two feasible types. The biconical line is simple of solution only as long as the apex is central with the sphere. For this reason the parallel plate line was chosen to handle more complicated feed geometries. The parallel plate line consists of two perfectly conducting parallel plates, spaced a distance apart equal to the gap distance, located interior to the sphere and connected to the sphere at the gap. Thus any radial component of current flowing on the parallel plate line can flow through the gap out onto the surface of the split sphere. If the line is excited at one point, it may be called a radial transmission line. A cross section of sphere and radial line is depicted in Fig. 2. 13 14 Figure 2= Cross Section of Antenna with Radial Line 3.2 The Field Solutions Consider a radial transmission line with the orientation of Fig. 3. Using cylindrical coordinates and the techniques of the previous chapter, a vector wave equation solution is constructed from the scalar wave equa tion solution. Let the scalar solutions be f and g The most convenient vector solutions are then given by the following: *f curl a f -z N - 1/k curl curl a g -g -■ (3 1) M r - 1/k curl N, -f -f The components of these are 1/ 9f 1/r — dtp 9f dr M (3-2) N - 1/k '-f- N 1/kr f^f N -1/kr 3 -(r|S) dr dr -1/r ,d!g (3-3) II'- r <• is used as constant vector the z unit vector a , In general, how- ever, the divergence of unit vectors is not zero, and thus unit vectors ■>"■ not fixed, e g , in spherical coordinates div a - 2/r — r 15 A more usable form of the last is N z = 1/k [k 2 g + -£] , (3-4) The scalar solution is well known: f ~ Z (/k - 3 r) [£ cos (3z + C sin (3z] [A cosmcp + B sin mcp] where Z is a linear combination of J and N Bessel functions. m Z=b Z=0 r ? Figure 3= Parallel Plate Regi on The separation constants are 3 and m. The complete solution is a double summation over the possible values of (B and m„ The two vector solutions give rise to two types of fields; TE and TVL For the TM modes, let E - 1/k-N , H = -J- M • "g - IK g while for the TE modes E ■ M f) H = - N . - n -f The f and g scalars differ only in the constants which are as yet unspee ified. The boundary conditions require that the tangential electric 16 field be zero at the two metal plates. So for z^0,bE (p ^0 = E For the TM case this means that (£ cos |3z - £ sin (3z) = |z = 0,b From this it is seen that a C = 0, sin 3b - 0, and 3 - ~, I = 0,1,2,3, (3-5) b The other constants are not determined yet so B, may be put equal to 1 with- out any restrictive effect. The TE case is analogous, giving (£ cos Bz - C sin 3z) | = z - 0,b and £, = 0, C - 1, and 6 is the same as above. These values, together with the equations (3-3,4) give the field ex- pressions for the permissible modes in the parallel plate line. In full form these expressions are TM. 8 3 E_ = — — — Z_ sin 3z [A cos m
/ C/2; this criterion is the same as that for a plane wave between parallel planes. If i> = there is propagation for 2n;r/X > m, and it may be noted that this con- dition involves the radius; a wave may be evanescent close to the source and propagating farther out. These modes vary with the azimuthal angle. For the assumed distribution of tangential E in the gap, it can be seen from Eqs. 3-6 to 3-15 that (3 = 0; the equations reduce to a simple 18 triplet. The transverse fields (transverse to the radius) can be written in terms of mode voltages: E z = 2 V m (kr) $(
Zqo of the lines, the source voltage,
and the self and mutual impedances of the antennas (which are, of
course, independent of the currents), find the base currents.
The input impedance of each element depends on the current flowing
21
k
Figure 4 Two Monopole Array
in the other element
Vi li L X x + I2 ^12
V 2 li Z 12 + 1 2 Z .
(3=25)
The base voltages and currents obtained from the transmission line
equations are given by
V = Vi cosh y^i ~~ li Z01 sinh y^i
V = V 2 cosh y^2 ~~ I2 Z 2 sinh y^2, (3-26)
Eliminating voltages to get an equation in the currents
V - [Ix Z n + I 2 Z 12 ] cosh y^i - li Z 01 sinh y^i
V = [Ix Z t , 2 + I 2 Z 22 ] cosh y^2 ~~ I2 Z 2 sinh y^2
(3-27)
22
These equations are solved simultaneously for the base currents which
are used to calculate the radiation pattern. The solution of Eq. 3-7
is straightforward but tedious. In summary, the impedance of each
element must be equated to the impedance seen into the line, and the
equations then solved simultaneously.
The next chapter will be concerned with matching the antenna
impedance to the line impedance, or, what is equivalent, matching the
magnetic fields at the aperture or gap.
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
I.I The Transverse Magnetic Field
The boundary conditions at the gap require that the transverse magnetic
field be continuous across the aperture With the assumed distribution of
tangential E, the radial line transverse magnetic field has only a cp com
ponent. Hence, the boundary situation will be approximated by matching this
component to the cp component of the antenna field From Eq , 2-11, the cp
component of external field is
J
H,
V( ka > a * £nm( 0( P)
(41)
Inserting the values for the mode functions and voltages gives
cd n
(UJTz:
H cp = - J/^ /_ — m [\a cos m(p " B - sin m ^
n=l m=0 n(n + X)
ni
ka Ka P A m (Q) PA" 1 ^) rn 2 (rhj; P n m (0) P n m (A)
ka h,
(rh n ) a
A - cos 6 at the gap edge.
na
(4-2)
Modes here involve both n and m but the radial line field has only m modes
Consequently, it is desirable to reorganize the double sum with the m sum
outermost so that a term-by-term comparison could be made with the single
series of the line. The sum is detailed in Fig 5
23
24
H,
nm
n=l m=
12 3 4
Figure 5 Sum By Rows
This summation is equivalent to the following summation by columns. Note
that this does not constitute a rearrangement, as the elements in any one
row (or column) have not been rearranged.
00 03
H n
l
S - S
u nm '-'oo
m-U n=m
» ►
/
VL
ii \ ^ /
— C
/
i /
/
/
Figure 6, Sum By Columns
To signify that the n = 0, m = term is not included, the notation used
is
00 00
«•
nm
m-0 n=m
where n starts at 1 if m = 0.
25
The magnetic field is then
CO
00
Hq, - -j/n ZmlAn cos m( P + B m sin m ^
(U n m )
-D
L _* n(n + 1)
n = m
ka h na P^CQ) p^(A) _ m 2 (rh n ); P n m (0) P n m (A)
ka h
( rh n)a
na
(4 3)
The inner series contains two terms; the summation of the first will be
designated S(m,a), the second, T(m,a) The value of these series depends
on a and m alone. Examination of the convergence and values of these
will occur later. Equation 4-3 becomes
oo
H cp = ~JM / Z m ( S ~ T ) f\i cos m( P + B m sin m ^ •
m=D
Equating this to the radial line field (3-18) yields
oo
3
= ) [Z m (S - T) -1/k ;£- ZJ [A,,, cos mcp + F^ sin mcp] (4-4)
nFD
which must hold for arbitrary radii a and coefficients A m , B m . This is
possible only if each term vanishes. Thus
k Z m [S(m.a) - T(m,a)] = §- Z
(4-5)
for each m = 0, 1, 2, ... It will be recalled that Z m is a linear
combination of Bessel functions; since the A, B coefficients are yet
unassigned, only one constant need be used in 7^, the ratio is the
quantity of importance. Let
Z m (ka) - w m J m (ka) + N m (ka). (4-6)
26
1.2 The Impedance Matching Function
Equation 4-5 allows the TJ m coefficients to be found for given a and
m. It may be recalled from Eq. 4-3 that the S(m,a), T(m,a) are, in
general, complex. Calling the real and imaginary parts of (S - T) by
S , S and the real and imaginary parts of TJ m by HT , w :
S 1 = Re [S(m,a> -T(m,a)] S 2 = Im [S(m,a) -T(m,a)] (4-7)
TS' = Re TJ m ^ - Im -0^ . (4-8)
The solutions for -®~ are
r » _ (SX- Jm)(SX-N m ) MS 2 ) 2 J m N n
(S 1 ^- J^) 1 + (s 2 J m ) 2
(4-9)
2
S 2 [J:N m - J m N']
t^' = — -i — " m m a m 2 2- ■ (4-10)
m (s 1 ^- Ji)" ^ (S"J n ) a
It may be easier to find tsl in terms of THL .
' , m m
yi. gl \-t -V s % ■ (4-ii)
The quantity of main interest is Z which turns out to be
Z (ka) - [J " (Sl " jS2) " J m^ J mN m ~ J m N m ) { ^ u)
(s 1 ^ - J m ) 2 ♦ (s 2 J m ) 2
After replacing the Wronskian by 2/rcka, the final form is obtained.
Z m ■■ -2- V Sl "J S 2 ) - Jm . (4 . 13)
nka (s 1 ^- J m ) a + (s 2 J m ) 2
Primed Bessel functions indicate derivatives with respect to argume
nt. I
27
The Z function is related to the relative proportion of radiation from one
m mode, assuming that all modes are excited in equal amounts. The actual
amount of each mode excited is dependent on the feed arrangement; i.e., on
the A, B's.
It is next necessary to arrive at some numerical values for the S(m,a)
and T(m,a) series which are repeated here,
oo
S(m>a) . V (2n + l)(n-m)! ka h na P n "(0) P^
n^,* 2n(n + l)(n + m) ! (rh n ) a
(A)
(4-14)
00
T(m,a)
I
n=m
(2n + l)(n - m)!m 2 (rhj' P n m (0) P n m (A)
n"a n
2n(n + l)(n + m)! ka h n;
* (4-15)
The rapidity of convergence may be examined through the use of asymptotic
formulas for large n. From Stirling's formula^'',
2m
(2n + l)(n-m)!
for large n.
(4-16)
2n(n + l)(n + m) ! n 2m + 1
From Morse and Feshbach'™) > the asymptotic form of the Hankel function
for large order may be found.
I^ (2) (x)
_2_ f2jl]n (e) -n + &c + Y 2 KJ
>l7in x
(4-17)
and h n (2)(x) = [^H n ?i/ 2 (x) so that
42
h (2) (x) . 1 lTr2n]n (e) -n + fee + ft* (4 _ lg)
x nI e [ x J
Thus
ka h
na
h (2)
na
< rh n>a
ka h
(2)
n - 1, a
- n
(2)
4ia
ka
n
(4-19)
28
The asymptotic formulas for the associated Legendre functions for large
lues of index n are, from Magnus and Oberhettinger^ ^' :
va
(-l) m+1
2- n m+Y2 sin[(n + V 2 ) 9 + S& - H]
S- P n m (cos 0) i5 2 4_ (4 . 20 )
36 n e ^ sin ^ 9
(-l) m f2~n m - l/2 cos[(n + %) 9 + ^ - ?]
>J tc 2 4
P n m (cos 6) (4-21)
e
"^ sin^ 9
These approximations are for n — °° and for 9 near n/2. Insertion of the
foregoing asymptotic forms into Eqs . 4-14 and 4-15 for the series shows
that the n tn term of both varies as 1/n plus a slow sign change; the
latter produces convergence. These series depend on both a and m and
therefore many computations of tedious nature would be needed. An
algorithm is needed to ease this problem. An attempt was made to find a
closed form for the series. The general term, involving the product of
two associated Legendre functions bears resemblance to the Addition
Theorem for those functions. The latter, however, contains a summation
on m whereas the series at hand involves n. Another possibility sug-
gested was the method of replacing the sum by a contour integral where
each term is the residue of the function at a pole on the real axis.
The trick is to replace this contour by one including the other singu-
larities of the function than the poles on the axis. Often this pro-
duces a much more rapidly converging series. This technique is elabo-
rated i ii Appendix V ■
29
4 3 Increasing the Rapidity of Convergence
Another technique that is often useful in situations of this type is
that of adding and subtracting a suitable convergent series to the series
under study. The new series is added term by term, and subtracted as a
sum. This new series is chosen to make the resulting series converge
more quickly. To this end two series are defined.
oo
m
n=m
(2n + l)(n - m)! P n m (0) P n m (A)
2n 2 (n + l)(n + m)!
00
(4-22)
n=m
00 00
y (2n + i)(n i m)! p n m(o) p n m ( A ) . y
L ^~* 2(n + l)(n + m)' *—=- *
n-m ^ v " L >\" »!/• n = m
(4-23)
Subtracting and adding these to Eqs. 4-14 and 4-15, respectively, produces
S(m, a) = -ka J S
m
/ nh na + ,
(4-24)
T(m,a) =
(r h n>a , -
nh na
(4-25)
From Eq. 4-19 it can be seen that as n increases, the factor
nh r
*na
(r ^ /
\ ///
XX /
\ *^
x^ \. /
/J\ /
// y
/iS
jmS^
ka=2.05
ka=2.20
ka=2.52
q) patterns. polarization
Figure 18. Patterns for LO Offset
54
/ \ *
* "«» f X
/ x /"
\ x \
/ >-"" /*
"N * x \
/ '*" X f
I x^"*^ \
/ ' \1
1/ * \
/ y aA
C^i
\. — **■ /
\ — ?jf
\ yf
>A /
\ /* 1
\/ i
\ V\ /
1 \ /
Nw \ y
// y
// x^
\^s\\.
^£^^
kar2.83
ka=3.l4
ka = 3.50
ka = 3.76
q) patterns 9 polarization
Figure 19 Patterns for ! Offset
55
ko = q 7i
feM5.34
ka= 5 80
ka = 6.28
cp patterns, polarization
Figure 20 Patterns for 1.0 Offset
56
Experimental measurements were conducted using the equipment and setup
described in Chapter 8. The antenna was a hemisphere of spun copper and
six inch diameter with a brass plate soldered across the base, The feed
was a standard BNC fitting, with a 1/16 inch gap. Measurements were taken
from 1 to 4 kmc and are the dashed curves of Figs. 18 and 19, Several
factors limit the correspondence of these with the theoretical patterns.
Several gap thicknesses were tried and it was found that at the higher
frequencies the patterns varied appreciably with the gap dimension.
Ideal ly ; this dimension would be as near zero as possible but the smaller
the gap the more critical the antenna is to errors in spacing around the
antenna base. Thus the aperture plate and antenna base must be perfectly
flat and parallel, a difficult condition to produce. Due to the finite
size of the receiving horns, the boom angle could not be 90°, the
closest value obtained was 83°. This also yields a slight divergence.
From the patterns taken, it appears that the gap introduces a fre-
quency shift of about five percent. That is, the theoretical patterns
corresponded most closely to those measured at a lower frequency.
Variation of a typical pattern with the offset is shown in Figs. 21
and 22 where patterns are given for offsets of 0.0, 0,2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8,
and 1 times the radius. A smooth transition from the circular pattern
at the center to the multi-lobed pattern at the edge may be seen-
5.4 Radiation Resistance
The radiation resistance for the antenna configuration of the last
sections is readily found by inserting the far field expressions into the
57
kd =
kd=0.2 ka
kd=0.4 ka
kd = 0.6ka
cp patterns, 9 polarization, 9 = 90°, ka = 2.83
Figure 21 Pattern as a Functicr. of Offset
58
kd-0.8 ko
l Bessel function parts are equal, term by term
67
Unconnected equations result which are readily solved With a radial
boundary, on the other hand, the cosine factors are fixed whereas the
Eessel function factors differ in eigenvalue and cannot be individually
equal; perforce, one must consider the series in toto Here then is
the set of simultaneous transcendental equations
6 3 Approximate Solutions
Since the problem cannot at present be exactly solved,, approxi
mate methods are in order. One such method, valid for coaxial or
radial lines whose ratio of outer to inner diameter is nearly unity,
has been obtained by considering the transmission region to be a
rectangular waveguide wrapped around laterally ^5) Another attack
is that of Schelkunof f ^o; wn i c h replaces the Maxwell equations by a
set of ordinary differential equations. If the parameters of the
medium can be linearly approximated, then the set of differential
equations reduces to a set of linear algebraic equations, a situa-
tion not nearly so formidible„ It would probably be possible to
attain a good answer through use of variational methods or Rumsey's
reaction concept. The author leaves this as a worthy problem,
A crude approximation which gives usable answers assumes the
field in each sector to be that which would exist in a radial line
completely filled with the dielectric of that sector. This is
tantamount to neglecting the reflected waves at the discontinuity
surfaces, and might be termed an optics or short wavelength approxi-
mation The radial guide with two 180° sectors of dielectric will
exemplify this approach Refer to Fig. 24.
68
Figure 2H Two Sector Guide
The homogeneous field in region I would be, from Eq. 5-2
J zl
ZTtC Zjqq
(6-2)
with the current I flowing in the feed post of radius c. For small c
(with respect to A) the behavior of Z o will be inspected. From
Chapter 4,
Z ' - - 'TJToJi - Ni
(6-3)
1 2
From that same chapter, W is given in terms of S , S These in turn
go back to the S(m,a), T(m,a) series which must be evaluated for small
radius, c
With kc «1,
h (2) (kc) ^ j (2n)!
2 n n! (kc) n+1
(rh n )^-
j (2n)!
2 n (n-1)! (kc) n+1
(6-4)
(6-5)
69
which allows
nc
~-l . (6-6)
(rhn)6
When these are inserted in Eq. 4 24, the series reduce to
S(0,c) = -kc So , T(0,c) = .
Thus S and S are, respectively,
S 1 - -kc S , S 2 = . (6-7)
The equations for U, (Eqs. 4-9, 4-10) now give the value
s'No + Ni
-GTo 1 = ~ "Ob 2 = (6-8)
S'Jq + Ji
Using Eq. 6-3 to get Z o in terms of Bessel functions and S's:
S 1 (J.No - JoNj
Z-oo ~ — (o-y)
S'Jo + J a
For small argument,
Jo ^ 1, J! ^Y 2 kc, N x ~ ~ 2
jkc
and
Zq<
S (4 + TtkV N )
n kc (2 S - 1)
2 2
For wires of small but finite size, K k c N <<; 4 and
Zoo - 4 S Akc(4S -l) .
70
The constant part may be called zeta,
4S C
C = , Z 00 = • (6-10)
kc(4S - 1) rckc
The electric field formula becomes
jrukjl Zo(kjr)
E z2 " '
2£ (6 11)
Since nk = wu., the e dependence enters only in the Z argument. The
two fields are then given by
E jri k I ZoCkjr) E = JT) k I Z (k 2 r)
^zl = "-"zl •
2 t 2 C
These step function components can be expanded in a cosine Fourier
series of the form
oo
e z = Y_ Zm(kr) ^ ° os m (3 ~ i8)
m=0
with the coefficients
A, Z m - ^ M Sin( ^ } [Z (k ia )^(l- [-1]-) Z (k 2 a)]. (6-12)
me m £
6 ^ A Twenty Sector Example.
To offer an example that could yield practical answers, one can
choose any large number of sectors in which to divide the circle, A
convenient number is twenty: since the loading was to be symmetrical,
thil ivs ten variables. (See Fig 25.) The plane of symmetry is
represented by
n m
(6-15)
where the A nm , D nm are related to the P^ by Eqs . 2-14, 3-20, amd 3-33
Insertion of these into Eq. 6-15 yields, after rearrangement,
(U n m ) cos mcp
2 2 -
n m n(n + 1)
m 2 h n [P n m (0)j
na
y„
f ka (rh n )' ,
[P n m (0)]
kr (rh n )'
(6-16)
This summation may, like the summation of Chapter 4, be rewritten with
the m sum outermost. Then the n sum, a function of m and a only, is
called W for convenience,,
» (U n m ) 2 fka (rh n )'
w - y — ^— — — tp n m (o)] 2 -
m Z^* n(n + 1)1 kr (rh n ) ' a
n-m
m 2 h n [P n m (0)] 2
na
. V
\ Z m W m cos m ®
(6-17)
(6-18)
m=0
The radiation field (that field at great distance) is the only field of
interest here soW m can be simplified by using large argument approxi-
mations for the Bessel functions. (See Eq. 5 18). In the form given
below, the constant factor kr eJ has been deleted.
*m ' l_
(U n m ) 2 (-j) n fka[P n m (0)] 2 m 2 [P n m (0)]
+ J"
n~~m* r '( n + 1)
(6-19)
( rh n);
na
W m h.i , been computed using techniques already described, lor several ka
and is shown in the set of graphs, Figs. 26 through 32.. For a given
antenna size, ka, and for a given set of dielectric sectors, the A m Z m
73
/
/
/
?V
V
-"
. -■"■
\
CJI
e'
to
ii
/
/
/
<■*■
/
1
s
>
\
\
\^ y
/
1
f
\
v >
X
\
X
s
\
(0
E
3=
/
V
J
o
It
«J
Qu
<0
o
Q£
to
CM
A
'/
/ .
\
/
CD
U_
\l
\
tf>
in
lO
CM
<£>
to
ro
CO
f T
CVJ
1
to
i
sr
in
i
to
i
&.
74
C\j
i T
CM
1
T
i
m
i
fc
75
/
/
/
2
m=5
/
/
/
•
1
/
s
/
/
Q
X
/
/
/
^m=7
'\
j »
/
m=4/
-'i
/
/
/
-z
\
\
\
/
/
■I. -■>
\
\
1
/
"3
\
\
\
/
/
1
\
\
t
/
/
-A
^_ /
)
3
4 5 6
Figure
; 28
Real f
>art o1
f W m (kc
76
\
\ II
t/
\
\
\
/
/
\
\
\
\
/-
y
i
1
i
\
\
\
/
/
/
/
/ ■
\
1
/
1
/
/
/
-
1
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
ro
CM
i
CM
I
ro
i
I
in
o
Si
E
o
L.
o
o
l_
o
CO
■o
c
o
u
CD
C7>
CO
CD
en
98
24 inch D, , two inches thick and two inches deep, which is secured
to the underside of the brass ring. The aluminum anulus is angle
ironed to a B-29 gun turret ring and bearing assembly. The latter has
two concentric formed rings, about a yard in diameter, with one ring
supported from the other by a number of radial and thrust ball bearing
races Figure 40 shows the underside of the screen, looking up at the
ring assembly This type of construction allows the access space be-
low the aperture plate to be completely clear Drive is provided by a
General Radio 1/15 hp direct current motor through a Boston gear re
duction box, using the large ring gear of the gun turret assembly for
traction Position data are provided by a 1:1 geared Selsyn.
Another aperture plate contains a square recess to accommodate
aperture plates 14 inches square, Both plates fasten by flat head
screws about 1 1/4 inch apart. The top surface of the screen and aper
ture is flat and smooth
A boom or swing frame carries the receiving horn. As may be noted
from the photograph, the boom is pivoted at two gear boxes located on
opposite corners of the screen. Vertical members are 2" by 4" lumber
while the horizontal crosspiece is a composite hollow four inch square,
glued and dowelled A universal mounting bracket allows quick inter
changeability of antennas The gear boxes each contain a large worm
•r to which the 2 by 4 is bolted, and a worm drive; one box also
contains a Selsyn takeoff These gear boxes are connected by a shaft
train which La offset to avoid fouling the aperture access, and which is
'irivr-n near its center Ijy another DC motor through a gear reduction box.
100
Ball bearing pillow blocks were used throughout to reduce friction To
insure reliable operation in damp and cold weather, the motors and
Selsyns were encased in sheet aluminum boxes, each heated by a light
bulb, Adjustable limit switches prevent the boom and antenna from
hitting the ground plane The crosspiece is adjustable in distance
from the aperture in six inch steps with a minimum of four feet and a
maximum of seven feet The control equipment will next be described.
7 2 Control and Electronic Equipment
Power for the drive motors is supplied by a five ampere Accurate
Engineering Co, dry rectifier for the armatures and a one ampere supply
of the same type for the fields These supplies are also used by
another pattern range A main control panel in the equipment shack
(see Fig 41) contains speed adjustments (variable resistance in arma-
ture circuit) and control switches. In this photograph, the racks on
the left hand side belong to another pattern range Motors may be
started and reversed from three locations main control panel, recorder
console, and a switchbox on the ground screen, with relays providing
the necessary interlocking Selsyn information from the ring or boom
may be switched to a dial indicator, or to the polar recorder A
Styroflex (low loss) cable and several other coaxial cables connect
the screen and the equipment racks These racks contain several
illators of the cavity type covering the range 300 to 3000 mc as
well ;is Klystron power supplies used to pipe voltages over a special
cable to Klystrons that might be located at the antenna terminals.
102
To date it has been possible to cover the entire range with adequate power
using the Hewlett-Packard line of standard Klystron signal generators. A
versatile switching arrangement allows any oscillator to be connected to a
wavemeter or to the aperture.
The received signal is intercepted by one of a set of horns and corner
reflectors that cover the range 1 to 18 kmc . A crystal or bolometer de
tector may be used, feeding the 1000 cycle signal to a PRD bolometer ampli-
fier via a coaxial switch panel . A signal is taken from this amplifier to
operate an external portable meter, and also the recorder. This latter
signal is rectified by a synchronously-driven chopper and the resultant
DC is fed to the recorder circuits. Both linear and square root response
are available in this recorder (Leeds and Northrup), an unusual feature
of which is that the servo amplifier gain is adjusted (on square root) by
a potentiometer ganged to the pen shaft so as to maintain the servo loop
gain at the low end of the scale This reduces the sluggishness of the
pen near zero.
To obtain patterns from an antenna mounted on either the square or
round aperture plates, the procedure is simple. The plate is bolted in,
then switches are set to connect a suitable oscillator. Next the proper
horn and detector is mounted on the boom. Maximum signal is then obtained
tuning the matching stubs, using the external meter. The aperture may be
set to a desired e
(-D
m^l
2
n| 71
4sin G
(1-3)
The approximation with respect to n is poor for n as large as 10
whereas the approximation is good for 9 near rc/2. A good approximation
for both is gained by combining Eq 1-2 and Eq. T-3 to get
p m (I-*)
±I!_ -v ( 1)^1 M35 (n 4 m ) in [(n + 1/)Q + m .. aj
12 4-6... (n - m - 1) 2 4
108
109
A typical case would have a gap angle of 1° or A = 1°. Then
n+3m+l
P n m '(A) - (-1) 2 l|3-5 (n + m) cQs (n + % )Q
1 2*4"6. . . (n - m - 1)
(1-5)
The general term of the series is then
(2n + l)(n - m)!
2n 2 (n + l)(n + m) !
1-1'3-S... (n + m)
1-2-4-6.. . (n - m - 1)
cos (n + y 2 )° (1-6)
where (n + m) is odd. For large n this becomes ^ cos n. If a zero gap
had been assumed, the cos n factor would be absent and the series would
diverge. The cos nA factor produces a slow sign change or alternation;
clearly, the larger the gap the faster the sign change. A one degree gap
corresponds to a sign change every 180 terms.
Since (n + m) is odd> two cases may be treated.
Case 1
n odd, m even.
Let
then
a = (n ± % )
n (n + 1)
1-3-5... (n - 2 )
1-2-4.. . (n - 1)
F m cos (n + y 2 )° ,
m
m ± l)(n - m + 3)...(n - l)(n + 2)(n + 4)
(n - m + l)(n - m + 2) . . . (n + m)
(1-7)
< n + m) ^ (1-8)
F = 1
F = (n - l)(n + 2)
2 n(n + 1)
F = (n - 3)(n - Uln + 21lB + 4)
(n - 2)n(n + l)(n + 3)
etc.
110
! a s e 2
Let
th
en
m
n even, m odd
a = (n + Y ? )
n (n + 1)
M-3-S. .. (n - 1)
1*2'4'6... (n)
F m cos (n + Y 2 )
v.\o
Ji + 1)(n + 3) ..(n + mUn - m + 1 Hn - m + g 3K . .tnll
(n - m + l)(n - m 4 2)...(n + m)n
(1-9)
(1-10)
Fi = iljL-L
F„ = (n - 2)(n t D(n + 3) etr
(n - l)(n)(n + 2)
The general scheme for performing the calculation is to: 1) set up a
table of cos (n + l A) in the memory, 2) form an iterative loop for com-
puting
' 1-1-3-5. .. (n - 2)
1-2-4-6... (n - 1)
using previous values. 3) set m, 4) form a loop for finding F m for the
given m, 5) change m and repeat. The program for one of these calcu-
lations is shown in the next several pages and in the block diagram of
Fig. II.
There is a possibility of sign change every 90 terms; the signs
alternate in pairs, +,-,-, + , + ,-, etc. The terms have been combined in
sets of two, one plus, one minus. Each set then contains 180 terms.
The sets form an alternating series so the truncation error can be re-
duced by adding only half of the last set. Using the ILLIAC, five sets
(900 terms) were evaluated giving an accuracy of four significant fig-
ures with the Las! figure in doubt. Cumulative error is believed to be
than the truncation error
o ._
& •
5 • g
S o g
o o
m
9 **>
s
a. «- - °
E
CO
• u>
° • «.
« E CM
wo
»1 >>
« O ■O
•o
1
o
z
ir.
>>
c
to M
CM
CD
i_
=3
cn
CM
CO
I
77
\
s
\
\
N
<0
it
\
\
\
\
/CO
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
v
N
\
\
N
\
\
\
\
\
\
\