UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN BOOKSTACKS THE ORIGINS OF CONTEMPORARY FRANCE THE ANCIENT REGIME BY HIPPOLYTE ADOLPHE TAINE Author of " A History of English Literature," "Italy," ttc. TRANSLATED BY JOHN DURAND. NEW EDITION, REVISED COPYBIGHT, 1876, BT HENRY HOLT. /I NOTE BY THE TRANSLATOR. In the title of this work, L' Ancien Regime, I have translated the French word ancien by the English word "ancient," not because the latter accurately expresses the meaning of the former, but because the French term ancien, as here used, implies not merely an old but a special regime ; and because since the publication of De Tocqueville's work, LAncien Regime et la Revolution, the term " ancient " applied to regime seems a naturalized translation of ancien, through its ^f frequent use in conversation, as well as in print ; lastly, because Webster seems to sanction the translation of ancien by " an- cient" in giving the French term as one of the etymological sources of the English term. IV D. E ft a 240068 PREFACE. IN 1849, being twenty-one years of age, and an elector, I was very much puzzled, for I had to vote for fifteen or twenty deputies, and, moreover, according to French custom, I had not only to determine what candidate I would vote for, but what theory I should adopt. I had to choose between a royalist or a republican, a democrat or a conservative, a socialist or a bonapartist; as I was neither one nor the other, nor even any- thing, I often envied those around me who were so fortunate as to have arrived at definite conclusions. After listening to various doctrines, it seemed to me that I was laboring under some mental defect. The motives that influenced others did not influence me. I could not comprehend how, in political matters, a man should be governed by his preferences. My affirmative friends planned a constitution the same as a house, according to the latest, simplest, and most complete notion of it, and many were offered for acceptance the mansion of a marquis, the house of a common citizen, the tenement of a laborer, the barracks of a soldier, the philanstery of a socialist, and even the camp of savages. Each claimed that his was "the true habi- tation for man, the only one in which a sensible person could live." I was not satisfied with such reasons, for I did not regard personal tastes as authoritative. It seemed to me that a house should not be built for the architect alone, nor for itself, but for the owner who was to occupy it. Referring to the owner for his advice, submitting to the French people the plans of its future habitation, would evidently be either for show, or to deceive them; such a question, in such a case, answers itself, and, besides, were the answer allowable, France was scarcely better prepared for it than myself; the combined ignorance of VI PREFACE. ten millions is not the equivalent of one man's wisdom. A people may be consulted and, in an extreme case, may deelare what form of government it would like best, but not that which it most needs. Nothing but experience can determine this; it must have time to ascertain whether the political structure is convenient, substantial, able to withstand inclemencies, and adapted to customs, habits, occupations, characters, peculiarities and caprices. For example, the one we have tried has never satisfied us; we have demolished it thirteen times in twenty years that we might set it up anew, and always in vain, for never have we found one that suited us. If other people have been more fortunate, or if various political structures abroad have proved stable and enduring, it is because these have been erected in a special way, around some primitive, massive pile, supported by an old central edifice, often restored but always preserved, gradually enlarged, and, after numerous trials and additions, adapted to the wants of its occupants. Never has one been put up instantaneously, after an entirely new design, and according to the measurements of pure reason. It is well to admit, per- haps, that there is no other way of erecting a permanent building, and that the sudden contrivance of a new, suitable, and enduring constitution is an enterprise beyond the forces of the human mind. In any event, I concluded for myself that, if we ever discover the one we want, it will not be through the processes now in vogue. In effect, the point is, to discover it, whether it exists, and not to submit it to a vote. Our preferences, in this respect, would be vain; nature and history have elected for us in advance; we must accommodate ourselves to them as it is certain that they will not accommodate themselves to us. The social and political forms into which a people may enter and remain are not open to arbitration, but are determined by its character and its past. All, even down to the minutest details, should be moulded on the living features for which they are designed; otherwise, they will break and fall to pieces. Hence it is that, if we succeed in finding our constitution, it will come to us only through a study of ourselves, and the more thoroughly we know ourselves, the greater our certainty in finding the one that suits us. We must, accordingly, set aside the usual methods and have a clear con- PREFACE. Vll ception of the nation before drawing up its constitution. The former is, undoubtedly, a more serious and more difficult task than the latter. What time, what study, what observations correcting each other, what researches into the past and the present, in all the domains of thought and of action, what manifold, secular efforts are necessary for acquiring a full and precise idea of a great people, which has already lived to a great age, and which still lives on ! Only in this way, however, can what is sound be established after having resorted to empty theories, and I resolved, for my own part, ai least, that, should I ever attempt to form a political opinion, it would be only after studying France. What is contemporary France? To answer this question, requires a knowledge of how France was formed, or, what is much better, being present at her formation, as if a spectator. At the close of the last century she undergoes a transformation, like that of an insect shedding its coat. Her ancient organiza- tion breaks up; she herself rends the most precious tissues and falls into convulsions which seem mortal. And then, there is recovery, after multiplied throes and a painful lethargy. But her organization is no longer what it was; a new being, after terrible internal travail, is substituted for the old one. In 1808, all her leading features are definitely established: departments, arrondissements, cantons and communes no change has since taken place in her outward divisions and adjunctions; the Con- cordat, the Code, the tribunals, the University, the Institute, the prefects, the Council of State, the imposts, the tax-collectors, the Cour des Comptes, with a centralized and uniform admin- istration its principal organs remain the same; henceforth, every class, the nobles, the commonalty, the laboring class, and the peasants each has the place, interests, sentiments and traditions that we now observe at the present day. Thus, the new organism is at once stable and complete. Its structure, its instincts, and its faculties indicate beforehand the circle within which its thought or action will be exercised. Surround- ing nations, some precocious, others backward, all with greater caution, and many with more success, effect the same transfor- mation in passing from the feudal to the modern State; the par- turition is universal and nearly simultaneous. But in the new, Vlll PREFACE. as well as under the old form, the weak are always the prey of the strbng. Woe to those whose too tardy evolution has sub- jected them to the neighbor suddenly emerged from his chrysalis state fully armed ! Woe likewise to him whose too violent and too brusque evolution has disturbed the balance of internal economy, and who, exaggerating his governing means, radically changing fundamental organs, impoverishing by degrees his vital substance, is condemned to rash undertakings, to debility and to impotence, surrounded by better proportioned and healthier neighbors ! In the organization effected by France at the beginning of the century all the main lines of her contempo- raneous history are traceable, political revolutions, social Utopias, the divisions of classes, the role of the Church, the con- duct of the nobles, of the bourgeoisie and of the people, and the development, direction or deviation of philosophy, literature and science. Hence it is that, in striving to comprehend our actual situation, we constantly revert back to the terrible and fruitful crisis by which the Ancient Regime produced the Revo- lution, and the Revolution the Modern Regime. The Ancient Regime, the Revolution, the Modern Regime, are the three conditions of things which I shall strive to describe with exactitude. I have no hesitation in stating that this is my sole object. A historian may be allowed the privilege of a natu- ralist ; I have regarded my subject the same as the metamor- phosis of an insect. The event, furthermore, is so interesting as to render it worthy of study for itself alone ; no effort is neces- sary to exclude mental reservations. Without taking any side, curiosity becomes scientific and centres on the secret forces which direct the wonderful process. These forces consist of the situation, the passions, the ideas, and the wills of each group of actors, and which can be defined and almost measured. They are in full view ; we need not resort to conjecture about them, to doubtful surmises, to vague indications. We enjoy the singu- lar good fortune of seeing the men themselves, their exterior and their interior. The Frenchmen of the ancient regime are still within visual range. All of us, in our youth, have encountered one or more of the survivors of this vanished society. Many of their dwellings, with the furniture, still remain intact. Their pic- tures and engravings enable us to take part in their domestic life, PREFACE. ix see how they dress, observe their attitudes and follow their move- ments. Through their literature, philosophy, scientific pursuits, gazettes, and correspondence, we can reproduce their feeling and thought, and even enjoy their familiar conversation. The multi- tude of memoirs, issuing during the past thirty years from public and private archives, lead us from one drawing-room to another, as if we bore with us so many letters of introduction. The inde- pendent descriptions by foreign travellers, in their journals and correspondence, correct and complete the portraits which this society has traced of itself. Everything that it could state has been stated, except what was commonplace and well-known to contemporaries, whatever seemed technical, tedious and vulgar, whatever related to the provinces, to the bourgeoisie, to the peas- ant, to the laboring man, to the government, and to the house- hold. It has been my aim to supply these omissions, and make France known to others outside the small circle of the literary and the cultivated. Owing to the kindness of M. Maury and the valuable indications of M. Boutaric I have been able to examine a mass of manuscript documents, consisting of the correspond- ence of numerous intendants, customs-directors, farmers-general, magistrates, employees and private individuals, of every kind and degree, during the last thirty years of the ancient regime, includ- ing reports and memorials belonging to the various departments of the royal household, the proch-verbaux and cahiers of the States-General, contained in one hundred and seventy-six vol- umes, the despatches of military officers in 1789 and 1790, the letters, memoirs and detailed statistics, preserved in the one hun- dred boxes of the ecclesiastical committee, the correspondence, in ninety-four files, of the department and municipal authorities, with the ministries from 1 790 to 1 799, the reports of the Coun- cillors of State on mission at the end of 1801, the reports of pre- fects under the Consulate, the Empire, and the Restoration down to 1823, and such a quantity of unknown and instructive docu- ments besides these that the history of the Revolution seems, indeed, to be still unwritten. In any event, it is only such docu- ments which can portray to us all these animated figures, the lesser nobles, the curates, the monks, the nuns of the provinces, the aldermen and bourgeoisie of the towns, the attorneys and syndics of the country villages, the laborers and artisans, the offi- X PREFACE. cers and the soldiers. These alone enable us to contemplate and appreciate in detail the various conditions of humanity, the in- terior of a parsonage, of a convent, of a town-council, the wages of a workman, the produce of a farm, the taxes levied on a peas- ant, the duties of a tax-collector, the expenditure of a noble or prelate, the budget, retinue and ceremonial of a court. Thanks to such resources, we are able to give precise figures, to know hour by hour the occupations of a day and, better still, read off the bill of fare of a grand dinner, and recompose all parts of a full-dress costume. We have again, on the one hand, samples of the materials of the dresses worn by Marie Antoinette, pinned on paper and classified by dates, and, on the other, we can tell what clothes were worn by the peasant, describe the bread he ate, specify the flour it was made of, and state the cost of a pound of it in sous and deniers. With such resources one becomes almost contemporary with the men whose history one writes and, more than once, in the Archives, I have found myself speaking almost aloud with them while tracing their old handwriting on the time-stained paper before me. August, 1875. CONTENTS. PKXFACK, . . . BOOK FIRST. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. CHAPTER I i THK ORIGIN OF PRIVILEGES. I. Services and recompenses of the clergy, p. i. II. Services and recompenses of the nobles, p. 4. III. Services and recompenses of the king, p. 9. CHAPTER II 13 PRIVILEGES. I. Number of the privileged classes, p. 13. II. Their pos- sessions, capital, and revenue, p. 13. III. Their immunities, p 16. IV. Their feudal rights. These advantages the remains of primitive sover- eignty, p. 19. V. They may be justified by local and general services, p. 26. CHAPTER III 28 LOCAL SERVICES DUE BY THE PRIVILEGED CLASSES. I. Examples in Ger- many and England. These services not rendered by the privileged classes in France, p. 28. II. Resident seigniors. Remains of the be- neficent feudal spirit. They are not rigorous with their tenants but no longer retain the local government. Their isolation. Insignificance or mediocrity of their means of subsistence. Their expenditure. Not in a condition to remit dues. Sentiments of the peasantry towards them, p. 30. III. Absentee seigniors. Vast extent of their fortunes and rights. Possessing greater advantages they owe greater services. Reasons for their absenteeism. Effect of it. Apathy of the provinces. Condition of their estates. They give no alms. Misery of their tenantry. Exactions of then- farmers. Exigencies of their debts. State of their justiciary. Effects of their hunting rights. Sentiments of the peasantry towards them, p. 40. CHAPTER IV 60 PUBLIC SERVICES DUE BY THE PRIVILEGED CLASSES. I. An English ex- ample. The privileged class renders no service in France. The influ- ence and rights which remain to them. They use them only for them selves, p. 60. II. Assemblies of the clergy. They serve only ecclesias Kfi CONTENTS. tical interests. The clergy exempted from taxation. Solicitations of its agents. Its zeal against the protestants, p. 61. III. Influence of the no- bles. Regulations in their favor. Preferments obtained by them in the church. Distribution of bishoprics and abbeys. Preferments obtained by them from the State. Governments, offices, sinecures, pensions, gra tuities. Instead of being useful they are an expense, p. 64. IV. Isolation of the chiefs. Sentiments of subordinates. Provincial nobility. The curates, p. 72. V. The king. The most privileged of all. Having mo- nopolized all powers, he takes upon himself their functional activity. The burden of this task. He evades it or is incompetent. His con- science at ease. France is his property. How he abuses it Royalty the center of abuses, p. 77. VI. Latent disorganization in France, p. 84. BOOK SECOND. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. CHAPTER I 86 THE PRINCIPLE OF SOCIAL HABITS UNDER THE ANCIENT REGIME. The Court and a life of pomp and parade. I. The physical aspect and the moral character of Versailles, p. 87. II. The king's household. Its officials and expenses. His military family, his stable, kennel, chapel, attendants, table, chamber, wardrobe, outhouses, furniture, journeys, p. 91. III. The society of the king. Officers of the household. In- vited guests, p. 98. IV. The king's occupations. Rising in the morn- ing, mass, dinner, walks, hunting, supper, play, evening receptions. He is always on parade and before company, p. 104. V. Diversions of the royal family and of the court. Louis XV. Louis XV., p. 109. VI. Other similar lives. Princes and princesses. Seigniors of the court. Financiers and parvenues. Ambassadors, ministers, governors, officers-ge'ne'raux, p. 1 13. VII. Prelates, seigniors and minor provincial nobles. The feudal aristocracy transformed into a drawing-room group, p. 119. CHAPTER II 123 DRAWING-ROOM LIFE. I. Perfect only in France. Reasons for this de- rived from the French character. Reasons derived from the tone of the court. This life becomes more and more agreeable and absorbing, p. 123. II. Subordination to it of other interests and duties. Indifference to public affairs. They are merely a subject of jest. Neglect of private affairs. Disorder in the household and abuse of money, p. 126. III. Moral divorce of husband and wife. Gallantry. Separation of parents and children. Education, its object and omissions. The tone of servants and purveyors. Pleasure- seeking, universal, p. 131. IV. The charm of this life. Good-breeding in the i8th Century. Its perfection and its resources. Taught and prescribed under feminine authority, p. 138. V. What constitutes happiness in the i8th Century. The fascination of display. Indolence, recreations, light conversation, p. 143. VI. Gayety in the i8th Century. Its causes and effects. Toleration and CONTENTS. rii license. Balls, fetes, hunts, banquets, pictures. Freedom of thfl magistrates and prelates, p. 147. VII. The principal diversion, elegant comedy. Parades and extravagance, p. 152. CHAPTER III ... - '57 DISADVANTAGES OF THIS DRAWING-ROOM LIFE. I. Its barrenness and artificiality. Return to nature and sentiment, p. 157. II. Its impres- sionability the final trait which completes the physiognomy of the century. Date of its advent. Its symptoms in art and in literature. Its dominion in private. Its affectations. Its sincerity. Its delicacy, p. 160. III. The failings of character thus formed. Adapted to on* situation but not to a contrary situation. Defects of intelligence. De- fects of disposition. Such a character is disarmed by good- breeding, p. 165. BOOK THIRD. THE SPIRIT AND THE DOCTRINE. CHAPTER I ' 170 THE COMPOSITION OF THE REVOLUTIONARY SPIRIT. Scientific acquisitions its first element. I. The accumulation and progress of discoveries in science and in nature. They serve as a starting-point for the new phi- Insophers, p. 170. II. Change of the point of view in the science of man. It is detached from theology and is united with the natural sciences, p. 175. III. The transformations of history. Voltaire. Criticism and conceptions of unity. Montesquieu. An outline of social laws, 177. IV. The transformation of psychology. Condillac. The theory of sensation and of signs, p. 181. V. The analytical method. Its principle. The conditions requisite to make it productive. These conditions wanting or inadequate in the i8th century. The truth and survival of the principle, p. 183. CHAPTER II 184 THE CLASSIC SPIRIT, THE SECOND ELEMENT. I. Its signs, duration and power. Its origin and public supporters. Its vocabulary, grammar and style. Its method, merits and defects, p. 184. II. Its original de- ficiency. Signs of this in the l8th century. It grows with time and success. Proofs of this growth in the i8th century. Serious poetry, the drama, history and romances. Short-sighted views of man and of human existence, p. 194. III. The philosophic method in conformity with it. Ideology. Abuse of the mathematical process. Condillac, Rousseau, Mably, Condorcet, Volney, Sieyes, Cabanis, ard de Tracy, Excesses of simplification and boldness of deduction, p. 201. CHAPTER III 204 COMBINATION OF THE TWO ELEMENTS. I The doctrine, its pretensions, and its character. A new authority for reason in the regulation of human affairs. Government thus far traditional, p. 204. II. Origin, nature and value of hereditary prejudice. How far custom, religion and government b fft CONTENTS. are legitimate, p. 207 III. The classic intellect incapable of accepting this point of view. The past and present titles of tradition misunder- stood. Reason undertakes to set them aside, p. 21 1. IV. Two stages in this operation. Voltaire, Montesquieu, the deists and the reformers represent the first one. What they destroy and what thej respect, p. 214. V. The second stage, a return to nature. Diderot, d'Holbach and the materialists. Theory of animated matter and spontaneous organization. The moral of animal instinct and self-interest properly understood, p. 216. VI. Rousseau and the spiritualists. The original goodness of man. The mistake committed by civilization. The injustice of property and of society, p. 221. VII. The forlorn hope of the philosophic party. Naigeon, Sylvain Mare'chal, Mably, Morelly. The entire discredit of traditions and institutions derived from it, p. 230. CHAPTER IV 232 THE ORGANIZATION OF SOCIETY IN THE FUTURE. I. The mathematical method. Definition of man in the abstract The social contract Inde- pendence and equality of the contractors. All equal before the law and each sharing in the sovereignty, p. 232. II. The first result The theory easily applied. Confidence in it due to belief in man's inherent goodness and reasonableness, p. 234. III. The inadequacy and fragility of reason in man. The rarity and inadequacy of reason in humanity. Subordination of reason in human conduct. Brutal and dangerous forces. The nature and utility of government. Government impossible under the new theory, p. 238. IV. The second result. The new theory leads to despotism. Precedents for this theory. Administrative central- ization. The Utopia of the Economists. Invalidity of preceding rights. Collateral associations not tolerated. Complete surrender of the in- dividual to the community. Rights of the State in relation to prop- erty, education and religion. The State a Spartan convent, p. 244. V. Complete triumph and last excesses of classic reason. How it be- comes monomania. Why its work is not enduring, p. 250. BOOK FOURTH. THE PROPAGATION OF THE DOCTRINE. CHAPTER I 252 SUCCESS OF THIS PHILOSOPHY IN FRANCE. Failure of the same philoso- phy in England. I. Causes of this difference. The art of writing in France. Its superiority at this epoch. It serves as the vehicle of new ideas. Books are written for people of the world. The philosophers are people of the world and consequently writers. This accounts for philoso- phy descending to the drawing-room, p. 253. II. Owing to this method it becomes popular, p. 256. III. Owing to style it becomes pleasing. Two stimulants peculiar to the i8th century, coarse humor and irony, p 257. IV. The art and processes of the masters. Montesquieu. Vo* taire. Diderot Rousseau. " The Marriage of Figaro," p. 259. CONTENTS. vt CHAPTER II 277 THE FRENCH PUBLIC. I. The Aristocracy. Novelty commonly repug- nant to it. Conditions of this repugnance. Example in England, p. 277. II. The opposite conditions found in France. Indolence of the upper class. Philosophy seems an intellectual drill. Besides this, subject for conversation. Philosophic converse in the l8th century. Its superiority and its charm. The influence it exercises, p. 279. III. Further effects of indolence. The sceptical, licentious and seditious spirit. Previous resentment and fresh discontent at the established order of things. Sympathy for the theories against it. How far ac- cepted, p. 284. IV. Their diffusion among the upper class. Progress of incredulity in religion. Its causes. It breaks out under the Regency. Increasing irritation against the clergy. Materialism in the drawing, room. Estimate of the sciences. Final opinion on religion. Scepti- cism of the higher clergy, p. 287. V. Progress of political opposition. Its origin. The economists and the parliamentarians. They prepare the way for the philosophers. Political fault-finding in the drawing- rooms. Female liberalism, p. 294. VI. Infinite, vague aspirations. Generosity of sentiments and of conduct. The mildness and good intentions of the government. Its blindness and optimism, p. 297. CHAPTER III ....... 305 THE MIDDLE CLASS. I. The former spirit of the Third-Estate. Public matters concern the king only. Limits of the Jansenist and parliament- arian opposition, p. 305. II. Change in the condition of the bourgeois. He becomes wealthy. He makes loans to the State. The danger of his creditorship. He interests himself in public matters, p. 307. III. He rises on the social ladder. The noble draws near to him. He becomes cultivated. He enters into society. He regards himself as the equal of the noble. Privileges an annoyance, p. 311. IV. Philosophy in the minds thus fitted for it. That of Rousseau prominent. This philosophy in harmony with new necessities. It is adopted by the Third-Estate, p. 315. V. Its effect therein. The formation of revolutionary passions. Levelling instincts. The craving for dominion. The Third-Estate de- cides and it constitutes the nation. Chimeras, ignorance, exaltation, p. 319. VI. Summary, p. 327. BOOK FIFTH. THE PEOPLE. CHAPTER I 329 I. Privations. Under Louis XIV. Under Louis XV. Under Louis XVI, p. 329. II. The condition of the peasant during the last thirty years of the Ancient Regime. His precarious subsistence. State of agriculture. Uncultivated farms. Poor cultivation. Inadequate wa- ges. Lack of comforts, p. 337. III. Aspects of the country and of the peasantry, p. 342. IV. How the peasant becomes a proprietor. H rrf CONTENTS. is no better off. Increase of taxes. He is the "mule" of the Ancient Regime, p. 345. CHAPTER II 349 TAXATION THE PRINCIPAL CAUSE OF MISERY. I. Direct taxes. State of different domains at the end of the reign of Louis XV. Levies of the tithe-owner and of the fisc. What remains to the proprietor, p. 349. II. State of certain provinces on the outbreak of the Revolution. The tattle, and other imposts. The proportion of these taxes in relation to income. The sum total immense, p. 351. III. Four direct taxes on the common laborer, p. 353. IV. Collections and seizures, p. 354. V. Indirect taxes. The salt-tax and the excise, p. 358. VI. Why taxation is so burdensome. Exemptions and privileges, p. 362. VII. The octrois of towns. The poor the greatest sufferers, p. 368. VIII. Com- plaints in the memorials, p. 370. CHAPTER III 374 INTELLECTUAL STATE OF THE PEOPLE. I. Intellectual incapacity. How ideas are transformed into marvellous stories, p. 374. II. Political in- capacity. Interpretation of political rumors and of government action, p. 377. III. Destructive impulses. The object of blind rage. Dis- trust of natural leaders. Suspicion of them changed into hatred. Dis- position of the people in 1789, p. 379. IV. Insurrectionary leaders and recruits. Poachers. Smugglers and dealers in contraband salt. Ban- ditti. Beggars and vagabonds. Advent of brigands. The people of Paris, p. 380. CHAPTER IV 390 I. Military force declines. How the army is recruited. How the soldier is treated, p. 390. II. The social organization is dissolved. No centrai rallying-point. Inertia of the provinces. Ascendency of Paris, p. 393. III. Direction of the current. The people led by lawyers. Theories and piques the sole surviving forces, p. 395. CHAPTER V 398 I. P- 398. II, P. 400- NOTES. Note I, p. 403. Note 2, p. 404. Note 3, p. 409. Note 4, p. 410. Note S* p. 4- THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK FIRST. Structure of &ocf**8 CHAPTER I. THE ORIGIN OF PRIVILEGES. I. Services and Recompenses of the Clergy. ' II. Services and Recompenses of the Nobles.4-111. Services and Recom- penses of the King. ! s\ IN 1789 three classes of persons, the Clergy, the Nobles, and the King, occupied the most prominent position in the State, with all the advantages which it comports; namely, authority, property, honors, or, at the very least, privileges, immunities, favors, pensions, preferences, and the like. If they occupied this position for so long a time, it is because for so long a time they had deserved it. They had, in short, through an immense and secular effort, constructed by degrees the three principal foundations of modem society. I. Of the three superposed foundations the most ancient and deepest was the work of the clergy. For twelve hundred years and more they had labored upon it, both as architects and work- men, at first alone and then almost alone. In the beginning, during the first four centuries, they constituted religion and the church. Let us ponder over these two words, in order to weigh them well. On the one hand, in a society founded on conquest, hard and cold like a machine of brass, forced by its very struct f 2 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK i. ure to destroy among its subjects all courage to act and all desire to live, they had proclaimed the "glad tidings," held forth the "kingdom of God," preached loving resignation in the hands of a Heavenly Father, inspired patience, gentleness, humility, self- abnegation, and charity, thus opening the only issues by which man stifling in the Roman ergastulum could again breathe and see daylight and this is religion. On the other hand, in a State gradually undergoing depopulation, crumbling away, and fatally becoming a prey, they had formed a living society governed by laws and discipline, rallying around a common object and a common doctrine, sustained by the devotion of chiefs and by he obedience of believers, alone capable of subsisting beneath the flood of barbarians which the empire in ruin, suffered to pour in through its breaches and this is the church. The Clergy continues to build on these two first foundations, and after the invasion, for over five hundred years, it saves what it can still save of human culture. It sends missionaries to the barbarians or converts them directly after their entrance; this is of vast service ; we can estimate it by one fact alone : In Great Britain, which like Gaul had become Latin, but whereof the conquerors remained pagan during a century and a half, arts, industries, society, language, all were destroyed; nothing re- mained of an entire people, either massacred or fugitive, but slaves. We have still to divine their traces ; reduced to the con- dition of beasts of burden, they disappear from history. Such might have been the fate of Europe if the clergy had not promptly tamed the fierce brutes to which it belonged. Before the bishop in his gilded cope, before the monk, " emaciated, clad in skins," wan, "dirtier and more spotted than a chameleon," 1 the converted German stood fear-stricken as before a sorcerer In his calm moments, after the chase or inebriety, the vague div- ination of a mysterious and grandiose future, the dim conception of an unknown tribunal, the rudiment of conscience "which he already had in his forests beyond the Rhine, arouses in him through sudden alarms half-formed, menacing visions. At the moment of violating a sanctuary he asks himself whether he may not fall on its threshold with vertigo and a broken neck. 1 s_ 1 "Les Moines d'Occident," by Montalembert, I. 277; St Lupicin before the Burgun- dian King Chilperic, II. 416; St. Karileff before King Childebert; cf. / "De 1'Administration des Finances," v. II. p. 181. The above relates to what wai called the clergy of France, (116 dioceses). The clergy called foreign, consisted of that of the three bishoprics and of the countries acquired after Louis XIV.; it had a separate regime and paid somewhat like the nobles. The lUcintes which the clergy of France levied BO its property amounted to a sum of 10,500,000 livres. CHAP. II. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 19 used towards persons of high rank; "in the provinces," says Turgot, " the capitation-tax of the privileged classes has been successively reduced to an exceedingly small matter, whilst the capitation-tax of those who are liable to the tailk, is almost equal to the principal of that tax." And finally, "the collectors think that they are obliged to act towards them with marked con- sideration" even when they owe; "the result of which," says Necker, "is that very ancient, and much too large amounts, of their capitation-tax remain unpaid." Accordingly, not having been able to repel the assault of the fisc in front they evaded it or diminished it until it became almost unobjectionable. In Champagne, "on nearly 1,500,000 livres provided by the capita- tion-tax, they paid in only 14,000 livres," that is to say, " 2 sous and 2 deniers for the same purpose which costs 12 sous per livre to those chargeable with the taille." According to Calonne, " if concessions and privileges had been suppressed the vingtitmes would have furnished double the amount." In this respect the most opulent were the most skilful in protecting themselves. "With the intendants," said the Due d'Orleans, "I settle matters, and pay about what I please," and he calculated that the pro- vincial administration, rigorously taxing him, would cause him to lose 300,000 livres rental. It has been proved that the princes of the blood, paid, for their two-twentieths, 188,000 instead of 2,400,000 livres. In the main, in this regime, excep- tion from taxation is the last remnant of sovereignty or, at least, of independence. The privileged person avoids or repels taxa- tion, not merely because it despoils him, but because it belittles him ; it is a mark of plebeian condition, that is to say, of former servitude, and he resists the fisc as much through pride as through interest. IV. Let us follow him home to his own domain. A bishop, an bbe", a chapter of the clergy, an abbess, each has one like a lay seignior; for, in former times, the monastery and the church were small governments like the county and the duchy. Intact on the other bank of the Rhine, almost ruined in France, the feudal structure everywhere discloses the same plan. In certain places, better protected or less attacked, it has pre- served all its ancient externals. At Cahors, the bishop-count of 20 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK i the town had the right, on solemnly officiating, "to place his casque, cuirass, gauntlets and sword on the altar." l At Besan- c.on, the archbishop-prince has six high officers, who owe him homage for their fiefs, and who attend at his coronation and at his obsequies. At Mende, 2 the bishop, seignior-suzerain for Gdvaudan since the eleventh century, appoints " the courts, ordi- nary judges and judges of appeal, the commissaries and syndics of the country," disposes of all the places, "municipal and judiciary," and, entreated to appear in the assembly of the three orders of the province, "replies that his place, his possessions and his rank exalting him above every individual in his diocese, he cannot sit under the presidency of any person ; that, being seignior-suzerain of all estates and particularly of the baronies, he cannot give way to his vassals," in brief that he is king, or but little short of it, in his own province. At Remiremont, the noble chapter of canonesses has, " inferior, superior, and ordinary judicature in fifty-two bans of seigniories," the gift of seventy- five curacies and of ten male canonships, appointing the munici- pal officers of the town and, besides this, three lower and highe: courts and everywhere the officials in the jurisdiction over woods and forests. Thirty-two bishops, without counting the chap- ters, are thus temporal seigniors, in whole or in part, of their episcopal town, sometimes of the surrounding district, and some- times, like the bishop of St. Claude, of the entire country. Here the feudal tower has been preserved. Elsewhere it is plastered over anew, and more particularly in the appanages. In these domains, comprising more than twelve of our departments, the princes of the blood appoint to all offices in the judiciary and to all clerical livings. Being substitutes of the king they enjoy his serviceable and honorary rights. They are almost delegated kings, amd for life; for they not only receive all that the king would receive as seignior, but again a portion of that which he would receive as monarch. For example, the house of Orleans collects the excises, 3 that is to say the duty on liquors, on works in gold or silver, on manufactures of iron, on steel, on cards, 1 See "La France ecclesiastique, 1788," for these details. 1 Official statements and manuscript reports of the States-General of 1789. "Archives Rationales," vol. LXXXVIII. pp. 23, 85, iai, 122, 152. Proems-verbal of January 12, 1789. Necker, "De 1* Administration des Finances," v. II. pp. 171, 272. "The house of Orleans, he says, is in possession of the excises. He values thit tax at 51,000,000 for the entire kingdom. CHAP. H. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. ^\ on paper and starch, in short, on the entire sum-total of one of the most onerous indirect imposts. It is not surprising, if, ap- proximating to the sovereign condition, they have, like sover eigns themselves, a council, a chancellor, an organized debt, a court, 1 a domestic ceremonial system, and that the feudal edifice in their hands should put on the luxurious and formal trappings which it had assumed in the hands of the king. Let us turn to its inferior personages, to a seignior of medium rank, on his square league of ground, amidst the thousand in- habitants which were formerly his villeins or his serfs, within reach of the monastery, or chapter, or bishop whose rights inter- mingle with his rights. Whatever may have been done to abase him his position is still very high. He is yet, as the intendants say, "the first inhabitant;" a prince whom they have about despoiled of his public functions and consigned to his honorary and available rights, but who nevertheless remains a prince. 2 He has his bench in the church, and his right of sepulture in the choir ; the tapestry bears his coat of arms ; they bestow on him incense, "holy water by distinction." Often, having founded the church, he is its patron, choosing the curate and pretending to control him ; in the rural districts we see him advancing or retarding the hour of the parochial mass according to his fancy. If he bears a title he is supreme judge, and there are entire provinces, Maine and Anjou, for example, where there is no fief without the judge. In this case he appoints the bailiff, the registrar, and other legal and judicial officers, attorneys, notaries, seigniorial sergeants, constabulary on foot or mounted, who draw up documents or decide in his name in civil and criminal cases on the first trial. He appoints, moreover, a forest-warden, or decides forest offences, and enforces the penalties which this officer inflicts. He has his prison for delinquents of various kinds, and sometimes his forked gibbets. On the other hand, as 1 Beugnot, " M6moires," v. I. p. 77. Observe the ceremonial system with the Due dt Pcnthlevre, chapters I., III. The Due d'Orlans organizes a chapter and bands of canon- esses. The post of chancellor to the Due d'Orleans is worth 100,000 livres per annum, ( ; 'Gustave ill. et la cour de France," by Geffrey, I. 410.) * De Tocqueville, ibid. p. 40. Renauldon, advocate in the bailiwick of Issoudun, " Traitfc aistorique et pratique des droits seigneuriaux, 1765," pp. 8, 10, 81 and passim. Memorial of a magistrate of the Chatelet on seigniorial judgments, 1789. DuvergJer, "Collection des Lois," Decrees of the 15-28 March, 1790, on the abolition of the feudal regime, Merlin of Douai, reporter, I. 114. Decrees of 19-23 July, 1790, *. 293. Decrees of the 13-^0 Aprl, 1791, I. 295. 22 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK \ compensation fur his judicial cc^ts, he obtains the property of the man condemned to death and the confiscation of his estate; he succeeds to the bastard born and dying in his seigniory with- out leaving a testament or legitimate children ; he inherits from the native, a legitimate child, dying intestate in his house with- out apparent heirs; he appropriates to himself movable objects, animate or inanimate, which are found astray and of which the owner is unknown ; he claims one-half or one-third of treasure- trove, and, on the coast, he takes for himself the waif of wrecks ; and finally, what is more fruitful, in these times of misery, he be- comes the possessor of abandoned lands that have remained un- tilled for ten years. Other advantages demonstrate still more clearly that he formerly possessed the government of the canton. Such are, in Auvergne, in Flanders, in Hainaut, in Artois, in Picardy, Alsace, and Lorraine, the dues for poursoin. ou dt sauvement (care or safety within the walls of a town), paid to him for his general protection ; those of guet et de garde (watch and guard), claimed by him for military protection ; of afforage, exacted of those who sell beer, wine and other beverages, whole- sale or retail; of fouage, dues on fires, in money or grain, which, according to many common-law systems, he levies on each fire- side, house or family ; of pulverage y quite common in Dauphiny and Provence, on passing flocks of sheep; the lods et ventes (lord's due), an almost universal tax, consisting of the deduction of a sixth, often of a fifth or even a fourth, of the price of every piece of ground sold, and of every lease exceeding nine years ; the dues for redemption or relief, equivalent to one year's in- come and which he receives from collateral heirs, and often from direct heirs ; and finally, a rarer due, but the most burdensome of all, that of acapte ou de plait-a-merri, which is a double rent, or a year's yield of fruits, payable as well on the death of the seignior as on that of the copyholder. These are veritable taxes, landed, on movables, personal, for licenses, for traffic, for muta- tions, for successions, established formerly on the condition of per- forming a public service which he is no longer obliged to perform. Other dues are also ancient imposts, but he still performs the service for which they are a quittance. The king, in fact, sup- presses many of the tolls, twelve hundred in 1724, and the sup- pression is kept up ; but a good many remain to the profit of the seignior, on bridges, on highways, on fords, on boats ascending OU*. n. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 23 or descending, he being at the expense of keeping up bridge, road, ford and tow-path, several being very lucrative, certain tolls producing 90,000 livres. 1 In like manner, on condition of maintaining the market-place and of providing scales and weights gratis, he levies a tax on provisions and on merchandise brought to his fair or to his market; at Angoulme a forty- eighth of the grain sold, at Combourg near Saint-Malo, so much per head of cattle, elsewhere so much on wine, eatables and fish.* Having formerly built the oven, the wine-press, the mill and the slaughter-house, he obliges the inhabitants to use these or pay for their support, and he demolishes all constructions which might enter into competition with him. 3 These, again, are evidently monopolies and octrois going back to the time when he was in possession of public authority. Not only did he then possess the public authonty but he possessed the soil and the men on it. Proprietor of men, he is so still, at least in many respects and in many provinces. " In Champagne proper, in the Senonais, in la Marche, in the Bour- bonnais, in the Nivernais, in Burgundy, in Franche-Comte, there are none, or very few domains, no signs remaining of ancient servitude. ... A good many personal serfs, or so constituted through their own gratitude, or that of their progenitors, are still found." 4 There, man is a serf, sometimes by virtue of his 1 National archives, G, 300, (1787). " M. de Boullongne, seignior of Montereau, possesses a toll-right consisting of 2 deniers (farthings) per ox, cow, calf or pig; i per sheep ; 2 for a loaded animal ; i sou and 8 deniers for each four-wheeled vehicle ; 5 deniers for a two- wheeled vehicle, and 10 deniers for a vehicle drawn by three, four, or five horses ; besides a tax of 10 deniers for each barge, boat or skiff ascending the river; the same tax for each team of horses dragging the boats up ; i denier for each empty cask going up." Analogous taxes are enforced at Varennes for the benefit of the Due de Chatelet, seignior of Varennes. * National archives, K, 1453, No. 1448: A letter by M. de Meulan, dated June 12, 1789. This tax on grain belonged at that time to the Comte d'Artois. Chateaubriand, "M^moires," 1-73. * Renauldon, ibid 249, 258. "There are few seignioral towns which do not have the lord'* slaughter-houses. The butcher must obtain special permission from the seignior." Th tax on grinding was an average of a sixteenth. In many provinces, Anjou, Berry, Maine. Brittany, there was a lord's mill for cloths and barks. 1 Renauldon, ibid. pp. 181, 200, 203; obsfe that he wrote this in 1765. Louis XVI. suppressed villeinage on the royal domains in 1778 ; and many of the seigniors, especially to Franche-Comt6, followed his example. Beugnot, " Memoires," v. I. p. 142. Voltaire, "Me'moire au roi sur les serfs du Jura." "M6rr.oires de Bailly," II. 214, according to an official report of the Nat. Ass., August j, 1789. I rely on this report and on the book of M. Clerget, curate of Onans in Franche- ComtS, who is mentioned in it M. Clerget says that there are still at this time (178^ 1,500,000 subjects of the king in a state of servitude but he brings forward no proofs to sup. pert these figures. Nevertheless it is certain that the number of serfs and mr rtraains is still 24 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK I birth and again through a territorial condition. Whether in servitude, or as mortmains, or as cotters, one way or another, fifteen hundred thousand individuals, it is said, wore about their necks a remnant of the feudal collar ; this is not surprising since, on the other side of the Rhine, almost all the peasantry still weai it. The seignior, formerly master and proprietor of all their goods and chattels and of all their labor, can still exact of them from ten to twelve corvees per annum and a fixed annual tax. In the barony of Choiseul near Chaumont in Champagne, "the inhabitants are required to plough his lands, to sow and reap them for his account and to put the products into his barns; each plot of ground, each house, every head of cattle pays a quit-claim ; children may inherit from their parents only on con- dition of remaining with them ; if absent at the time of their decease he is the inheritor." This is what was styled in the language of the day an estate "with excellent dues." Elsewhere the seignior inherits from collaterals, brothers or nephews, if they were not in community with the defunct at the moment of his death, which community is only valid through his consent. In the Jura and the Nivernais, he may pursue fugitive serfs, and demand at their death, not only the property left by them on his domain, but, again, the pittance acquired by them elsewhere. At Saint-Claude, he acquires this right over any person that passes a year and a day in a house belonging to the seigniory. As to ownership of the soil we see still more clearly that he once had entire possession of it. In the district subject to his juris- diction the public domain remains his private domain; roads, streets and open squares form a part of it; he has the right to plant trees in them and to take trees up. In many provinces, through a pasturage rent, he obliges the inhabitants to pay for permits to pasture their cattle in the fields after the crop, and in the open common lands, ( les terres vaines etvagues). Unnavigable streams belong to him, as well as islets and accumulations formed in them and the fish that are found in them. He has the right of the chase over the whole extent of his jurisdiction, this very great National archives, H, 723, memorials on mortmains in Franche-Comtfi in 1788; H, 200, memorials by Amelot on Burgundy in 1 785. "In the sub-delegation of Charolles the inhabitants seem a century behind the age ; being subject to feudal tenures, such as mort- main, neither mind nor body have any play. The redemption of mortmain, of which th Icing himself has set the example, has been put at such an exorbitant price by laymen, th unfortunate sufferers cannot, and will not be able to secure it." CHAP. II. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 25 or that plebeian being sometimes compelled to throw open to him his park enclosed by walls. One more trait serves to complete the picture. This head of the State, a proprietor of man and of the soil, was once a resi- dent cultivator on his own small farm amidst others of the same class and, by this title, he reserved to himself certain working privileges which he always retained. Such is the right of banvin, still widely diffused, consisting of the privilege of selling his own wine, to the exclusion of all others, during thirty or forty days after gathering the crop. Such is, in Touraine, the right of preage, which is the right to send his horses, cows and oxen " to browse under guard in his subjects' meadows." Such is, finally, the monopoly of the great dove-cot, from which thousands of pigeons issue to feed at all times and seasons and on all grounds, without any one daring to kill or take them. Through another effect of the same qualification he imposes quit-claims on property on which he has formerly given perpetual leases, and, under the terms, cens, censives (quit-rents), carpot (share in wine), champart (share in grain), agrier (a cash commission on general product), terrage parciere (share of fruits), all these collections, in money or in kind, are as various as the local situations, accidents and transactions could possibly be. In the Bourbonnais he has one- quarter of the crop ; in Berry twelve sheaves out of a hundred. Occasionally his debtor or tenant is a community : one deputy in the National Assembly owned a fief of two hundred casks of wine on three thousand pieces of private property. 1 Besides, through the retrait censttel (a species of right of redemption), he can " retain for his own account all property sold on the condi- tion of remunerating the purchaser, but previously deducting for his benefit the lord's dues (lods et ventes)." The reader, finally, must take note that all these zestrictions on property constitute, for the seignior, a privileged credit as well on the product as on the price of the ground, and, for the copyholders, an impre- scriptible, indivisible and irredeemable debt. Such are the feudal rights. To form an idea of them in their totality ws must always imagine the count, bishop or abbot of the tenth century as sovereign and proprietor in his own canton. The form which human society then takes grows out of the 1 Boiteau, ibid, p 25, (April, 1790). Beugnot, "Mmoires," I, 142 26 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK I exigencies of near and constant danger with a view to loca defence, by subordinating all interests to the necessities of living, iii such a way as to protect the soil by fixing on the soil, through property and its enjoyment, a troop of brave men under the leadership of a brave chieftain. The danger having passed away the structure became dilapidated. For a pecuniary compensation the seigniors allowed the economical and tenacious peasant to pick off it a good many stones. Through constraint they suffered the king to appropriate to him- self the public portion. The primitive foundation remains, prop- erty as organized in ancient times, the fettered or exhausted land supporting a social conformation that has melted away, in short, an order of privileges and of thraldom of which the cause and the purpose have disappeared. 1 V. All this does not suffice to render this order detrimental or even useless. In reality, the local chief who no longer performs his ancient service may perform a new one in exchange for it. Instituted for war when life was militant, he may serve in quiet times when the regime is pacific, while the advantage to the nation is great in which this transformation is accomplished ; for, retaining its chiefs, it is relieved of the uncertain and perilous operation which consists in creating others. There is nothing more difficult to establish than a government, that is to say, a stable government : this involves the command of some and the obedience of all, which is against nature. That a man in his cabinet, often a feeble old person, should dispose of the lives and property of twenty or thirty thousand men, most of whom he has never seen ; that he should order them to pay away the tenth or a fifth of their income and they should do it ; that ne should order them to go and slaughter or be slaughtered and that they should go; that they should thus continue for ten years, twenty years, through every kind of trial, defeat, misery and invasion, as with the French under Louis XIV., the English under Pitt, the Prussians under Frederick II., without either sedition or internal disturbances, is certainly a marvellous thing, and, for a people to remain free it is essential that they should 1 S note 2 at the end of the volume. CHAP. ii. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 2) be ready to do this daily. Neither this fidelity nor this concord are due to sober reflection (la raison raisonnante ) ; reason is too vacillating and too feeble to bring about such a universal and ener- getic result. Abandoned to itself and suddenly restored to a nat- ural condition, the human flock is capable only of agitation, of mut- ual strife until pure force at length predominates, as in barbarous times, and until, amidst the dust and outcry, some military leader rises up who is, generally, a butcher. Historically considered it is better to continue on than to begin over again. Hence, especially when the majority is uncultivated, it is beneficial to have chiefs designated beforehand through the hereditary custom by which people follow them, and through the special education by which they are qualified. In this case the public has no need to seek for them to obtain them. They are already on hand, in each canton, visible, accepted beforehand; they are known by their names, their title, their fortune, their way of living ; deference to their authority is established. They are almost always deserving of this authority ; born and brought up to exercise it they find in tradition, in family example and in family pride, powerful ties that nourish public spirit in them ; there is some probability of their comprehending the duties with which their prerogative endows them. Such is the renovation which the feudal regime comports. The ancient chieftain can still guarantee his pre-eminence by his services, and remain popular without ceasing to be privileged. Once a captaii in his district and a permanent gendarme he is to become the resident and beneficent proprietor, the voluntary promoter of useful undertakings, the obligatory tutor of the poor, the gratuitous administrator and judge of the canton, the unsalaried deputy to the king, that is to say, a leader and pro- tector as formerly, through a new system of patronage accom- modated to new circumstances. Local magistrate and central representative, these are his two principal functions, and, if we extend our observation beyond France we find that he exercise* either one or the other, or both togethe'. CHAPTER III. LOCAL SERVICES DUE BY THE PRIVILEGED CLASSES. I. Examples in Ger many and England. These services not rendered by the privileged classe* hi France. II. Resident Seigniors. Remains of the beneficent feudal spirit. They are not rigorous with their tenants but no longer retain the local government. Their isolation. Insignificance or mediocrity of their means of subsistence. Their expenditure. Not in a condition to remit dues. Sentiments of the peasantry towards them. III. Absentee Seigniors. Vast extent of their fortunes and rights. Possessing greater advantages they owe greater services. Reasons for their absenteeism. Effect of it. Apathy of the provinces. Condition of their estates. They give no alms. Misery of their tenantry. Exactions of their agents. Exigencies of their debts. State of their justiciary. Effects of their hunting rights. Sentiments of the peasantry towards them. I. LET us consider the first one, local government. There are countries at the gates of France in which feudal subjection, more burdensome than in France, seems lighter because, in the other scale, the benefits counterbalance disadvantages. At Munster, in 1809, Beugnot finds a sovereign bishop, a town of convents and a large seigniorial mansion, a few merchants for indispensable trade, a small bourgeoisie, and, all around, a peasantry composed of either colons or serfs. The seignior deducts a portion of all their crops in provisions or in cattle, and, at their deaths, a por- tion of their inheritances ; if they go away their property reverts to him. His servants are chastised like Russian moujiks, and in each outhouse is a trestle for this purpose "without prejudice t > graver penalties," probably the bastinade and the like. Bit "never did the culprit entertain the slightest idea of complaint or appeal." For if the seignior whips them as the father of a family he protects them "as the father of a family, ever coming to their assistance when misfortune befalls them and taking care of them in their illness ; " he provides an asylum for them in old age; he looks after their widows, and rejoices when they hav CHAP. in. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 29 plenty of children ; he is bound to them by common sympathies ; they are neither miserable nor uneasy ; they know that, in every extreme or unforeseen necessity, he will be their refuge. 1 In the Prussian states, and according to the code of Frederick the Great, a still more rigorous servitude is atoned for by similar obligations. The peasantry, without their seignior's permission, cannot alienate a field, mortgage it, cultivate it differently, change their occupa- tion or marry. If they leave the seigniory he can pursue there in every direction and bring them back by force. He has the right of surveillance over their private life and he chastises them if drunk or lazy. When young they serve for years as servants in his mansion ; as cultivators they owe him corvees and, in cer- tain places, three times a week. But, according to both law and custom, he is obliged " to see that they are educated, to succoi them in indigence, and, as far as possible, to provide them with the means of support." Accordingly he is charged with the duties of the government of which he enjoys the advantages, and, under the heavy hand which curbs them, but which sustains them, we do not find his subjects recalcitrant. In England, the upper class attain to the same result by other ways. There also the soil still pays the ecclesiastic tithe, strictly the tenth, which is much more than in France. 2 The squire, the nobleman, pos- sesses a still larger portion of the soil than his French neighbor and, in truth, exercises greater authority in his canton. But his tenants, the lessees and the farmers, are no longer his serfs, nor even his vassals ; they are free. If he governs it is through in- fluence and not by virtue of a command. Proprietor and patron, he is held in respect ; lord-lieutenant, officer in the militia, ad- ministrator, justice, he is visibly useful. And, above all, he lives at home, from father to son ; he belongs to the canton ; he is in hereditary and constant relation with the local public, through his occupations and through his pleasures, through the chase and caring for the poor, through his farmers whom he admits at his table and through his neighbors whom he meets in committee or in the vestry. This shows how the old hierarchies are main- 1 Beugnot, "M6moires," v. I. p. 292. De Tocqueville, "L'Ancien Regime et la ReVoIu- tton." * Arthur Young, "Travels In France," II. 456. In France, he says, it is from the eleventh to the thirty-second. "But nothing is known like the enormities connrtted in England where the tenth is really taken." 3* 30 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK I tained : it is necessary, and it suffices, that they should change their military into a civil order of things and find modern em- ployment for the chieftain of feudal times. II. If we go back a little way in our history we find here and there similar nobles. 1 Such was the Due de Saint-Simon, father of the writer, a real sovereign in his government of Blaye, and respected by the king himself. Such was the grandfather of Mirabeau, in his chateau of Mirabeau in Provence, the haugh- tiest, most absolute, most intractable of men, "demanding that the officers whom he appointed in his regiment should be favor- ably received by the king and by his ministers," tolerating the inspectors only as a matter of form, but heroic, generous, faithful, distributing the pension offered to himself among six wounded captains under his command, mediating for poor litigants in the mountain, driving off his grounds the wandering attorneys who come to practise their chicanery, "the natural protector of man," even against ministers and the king. A party of tobacco in- spectors having searched his curate's house, he pursues them so energetically on horseback that they hardly escape him by fording the Durance, whereupon, "he wrote to demand the dis- missal of the officers, declaring that unless this was done every person employed in the Excise should be driven into the Rhine or the sea ; some of them were dismissed and the director him- self came to give him satisfaction." Finding his canton sterile and the settlers on it idle he organizes them into companies, men, women and children, and, in the foulest weather, puts himself at their head, with his twenty severe wounds and his neck supported by a piece of silver; he pays them to work, making them clear off the lands, which he gives them on leases of a hundred years, and he makes them enclose a mountain of rocks with high walls and plant it with olive trees. " No one, under any pretext could be excused from working unless he was ill, 1 Salot-Simon, "Memoires," ed. Ch6ruel, vol. I. Lucas de Montigny, "M6mcires dt Mirabeau," I. 53-182. Marshal Marmont, "M6moires," I. 9, n. Chateaubriand, "Mi*- moires," I. 17. De Montlosier, "Meinoires," 2 vol. passim. Mme. de Larochejacquelein, " Souvenirs," passim. Many details concerning the types of the old nobility will be found in these passages. They are truly and forcibly depicted in two novels by Balzac, in "Beatrix," the Baron de Gunic, and in the "Cabinet Jes Antiques," the Marquu d'E grignon. CHAP. in. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 31 and in this case under treatment, or occupied on his own property, a point in which my father could not be deceived, and nobody would have dared to do it." These are the last offshoots of the old, knotty, savage trunk, but still capable of affording shelter. Others could still be found in remote cantons, in Brittany and in Auvergne, veritable district commanders, and I am sure that in time of need the peasants would obey them as much out of respect as from fear. Vigor of heart and of body justifies its own ascendency, while the superabundance of energy which begins in violence ends in beneficence. Less independent and less harsh a paternal government sub- sists elsewhere, if not in the law at least through custom. In Brittany, near Tre"guier and Lannion, says the bailly of Mira- beau, 1 " the entire staff of the coast-guard is composed of peo- ple of quality and of races of a thousand years. I have not seen one of them get irritated with a peasant-soldier, while, at the same time, I have seen on the part of the latter an air of filial respect for them. . . . It is a terrestrial paradise with respect to patriarchal manners, simplicity and true grandeur : the atti- tude of the peasants towards the seigniors is that of an affection- ate son with his father; and the seigniors in talking with the peasants use their rude and coarse language and speak only in a kind and genial way. We see mutual regard between masters and servants." Farther south, in the Bocage a wholly agricultural region, and with no roads, where ladies are obliged to travel on horseback and in ox-carts, where the seignior has no farmers, but only twenty-five or thirty metayers who work for him on shares, the supremacy of the great is no offence to their inferiors. People live together harmoniously when living together from birth to death, familiarly, and with the same interests, occupa- tions and pleasures ; like soldiers with their officers, on campaigns and under tents, in subordination although in companionship, familiarity never endangering respect. " The seignior often visits them on their small farms, 2 talks with them about their affairs, about taking care of their cattle, sharing in the accidents and mishaps which likewise seriously affect him. He attends their 1 A letter of the bailly of Mirabeau, 1760, published by M. de Lom6nie in the "Corre*. pendant," v. XLXIX. p. 132. * Mme. de Larochejacquelein, ibid. I. 84. " As M. de Marigny had some kn owledge of fce veterinary art the peasants of the canton came after him when th f had sicV animal* " J2 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK I. childrens' weddings and drinks with the guests. On Sunday there are dances in the chateau court and the ladies take part in them." When he is about to hunt wolves or boars the curate gives notice of it at the sermon ; the peasants, with their guns, gayly assemble at the rendezvous, finding the seignior who assigns them their posts, and strictly observing the directions he gives them. Here are soldiers and a captain ready made A little later, and of their own accord, they will choose him for com mandant in the national guard, mayor of the commune, chief of the insurrection, and, in 1792, the marksmen of the parish are to march under him against "the blues" as, at this epoch, against the wolves. Such are the remnants of the good feudal spirit, like the scattered remnants of a submerged continent. Before Louis XIV., the spectacle was similar throughout France. "The rural nobility of former days," says the Marquis of Mira- beau, "spent too much time over their cups, slept on old chairs or pallets, mounted and started off to hunt before daybreak, met together on St. Hubert's and did not part until after the octave of St. Martin. . . . These nobles led a gay and hard life, volun- tarily, costing the State very little and producing more for it by staying at home and utilizing manure-heaps than we of to-day with our tastes, our researches, our cholics and our vapors. . . . The custom, and it may be said, the passion of constantly making presents to the seigniors, is well known. I have, in my time, seen this custom everywhere disappear, and properly. . . . The seigniors are no longer of any consequence to them; it is quite natural that they should be forgotten by them as they forget. . . . The seignior being no longer known on his estates everybody pillages him, which is right." 1 Everywhere, except in remote corners, the affection and unity of the two classes has disappeared ; the shepherd is separated from his flock, and the pastors of the people end in being considered its parasites. Let us first follow them into the provinces. We here find only the minor class of nobles and a portion of those of medium rank ; the rest are in Paris. 2 There is the same line of separation in the church : abbeVcommendatory, bishops and archbishops very seldom live at home ; the grand-vicars and canons live in 1 Marquis de Mirabeau, "Trait6 de la Population," p. 57. * De Tocqueville, ibid. p. 180. This is proved by the registers of the capitation-Mr which was paid at the actual domicile. CHAP. ill. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 33 the large towns ; only priors and curates dwell in the rural dis- tricts ; ordinarily the entire ecclesiastic or lay staff is absent ; residents are furnished only by the secondary or inferior grades. What are their relations with the peasant ? One point is certain, and that is that they are not usually hard, nor even indifferent, *o h:m. Separated by rank they are not so by distance; neighbor- hood is of itself a bond among men. I have read in vain ; [ have not found in them the rural tyrants depicted by the de claimers of the Revolution. Haughty with the bourgeois they are generally kind to the villager. " Let any one travel through the provinces," says a contemporary advocate, "over the estates occupied by the seigniors; out of a hundred one may be found where they tyrannize over their dependants; all the others patiently share the misery of those subject to their jurisdiction. . . . They give their debtors time, remit sums due and afford them every facility for settlement. They mollify and temper the sometimes over-rigorous proceedings of ihefermiers, stewards and other men of business." l An Englishwoman, who observes them in Provence just after the Revolution, says that, detested at Aix, they are much beloved on their estates. "Whilst they pass the first citizens with their heads erect and an air of disdain, they salute peasants with extreme courtesy and affability." One of them distributes among the women, children and the aged on his domain wool and flax to spin during the bad season and, at the end of the year, he offers a prize of one hundred livres for the best two pieces of cloth. In numerous instances the peasant- purchasers of their land voluntarily restore it for the purchase money. Around Paris, near Romainville, after the terrible storm of 1788 there is prodigal alms-giving; " a very wealthy man im- mediately distributes forty thousand francs among the surround- ing unfortunates;" during the winter, in Alsace and in Paris, everybody is giving; "in front of each hotel belonging to a well- known family a big log is burning to which, night and day, the poor can come and warm themselves." In the way of charity, the monks who remain on their premises and witness the public misery, continue faithful to the spirit of their institution. On 1 Renauldon, ibid., Preface p. 5. Anne Plumptre, "A narrative of three years residence In France from 1802 to 1805," II. 357. Baroness Oberkirk, "Mejnoires," II. 389. "D r^tat religieux," by the abbe's Bocnefol and Bernard, 1784 p. 295. Mme Vigee-Lebrun Souvenirs," p. 171. 34 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK i the birth of the Dauphin the Augustins of Montmorillon in Poitou pay out of their own resources the tallies and corvees of nineteen poor families. In 1781, in Provence, the Dominicans of Saint Maximin support the population of their district in w.iich the tempest had destroyed the 'vines and the olive ttees. "The Carthusians of Paris furnish the poor with eighteen hun- dred pounds of bread per week. During the winter of 1784 there is an increase of alms-giving in all the religious establish- ments; their farmers distribute aid among the poor people of the country, and, to provide for these extra necessities, many of the communities increase the rigor of their abstinences." When, at the end of 1789, their suppression is in question, I find a number of protests in their favor, written by municipal officers, by prominent individuals, by a crowd of inhabitants, workmen and peasants, and these columns of rustic signatures are truly eloquent. Seven hundred families of Cateau-Cambre'sis 1 send in a petition to retain "the worthy abbe's and monks of the Abbey of St. Andrew, their common fathers and benefactors, who fed them during the tempest." The inhabitants of St. Savin, in the Pyrenees, "portray with tears of grief their consternation" at the prospect of suppressing their abbey of Benedictines, the sole charitable organization in this poor country. At Sierk, near Thionville, "the Chartreuse," say the leading citizens, "is, for us, in every respect, the Ark of the Lord ; it is the main support of from more than twelve to fifteen hundred persons who come to it every day in the week. This year the monks have distributed amongst them their own store of grain at sixteen livres less than the current price." The regular canons of Domievre, in Lor- raine, feed sixty poor persons twice a week ; it is essential to re- tain them, says the petition, " out of pity and compassion for the poor beings whose misery cannot be imagined ; where there are no regular convents and canons in their dependency, the poor cry with misery." 2 At Moutiers-Saint-John, near Semur in Bur- gundy, the Benedictines of Saint-Maur support the entire village 1 Archives nationales, D, XIX. portfolios 14, 15, 25. Five bundles of papers are filled with these petitions. 1 Ibid, D, XIX. portfolio u. An admirable letter by Joseph of Saintignon, abb6 of Domievre, general of the regular canons of Salnt-Sauveur and a resident He has 23,000 livres income, of which 6,066 livres is a pension from the government, in recompense for his tervices. His personal expenditure not being over 5,000 livres "he is in a situation to distribute among the poor and the workmen, in the space cf eleven yean, mote than 250,000 Ivre*." CHAP. ni. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 35 and supply it this year with food during the famine. Near Morley in Barrois, the abbey of Auvey, of the Cistercian order, "was always, for every village in the neighborhood, a bureau of charity." At Airvault, in Poitou, the municipal offi- cers, the colonel of the national guard, and numbers of "rustics and inhabitants" demand the conservation of the regular canons of St. Augustin. "Their existence," says the petition, "is abso- lutely essential, as well for our town as for the country and we should suffer an irreparable loss in their suppression." The municipality and permanent council of Soissons write that the establishment of Saint-Jean des Vignes "has always earnestly claimed its share of the public charges. This is the institution which, in times of calamity, welcomes shelterless citizens and provides them with subsistence. It alone bears the expenses of the assembly of the bailiwick at the time of the election of deputies to the National Assembly. A company of the regiment of Armagnac is actually lodged under its roof. This institution is always found wherever sacrifices are to be made." In scores of places declarations are made that the monks are " the fathers of the poor." In the diocese of Auxerre, during the summer of 3789, the Bernardines of Rigny, "stripped themselves of all they possessed in favor of the inhabitants of neighboring villages : bread, grain, money and other supplies, have all been lavished on about twelve hundred persons who, for more than six weeks, never failed to present themselves at their door daily. . . . Loans, advances made on farms, credit with the purveyors of the house, all has contributed to facilitating their means for relieving the people." I omit many other traits equally forcible ; we see that the ecclesiastical and lay seigniors are not simple egoists when they live at home. Man is compassionate for ills of which he is a witness ; absence is necessary to deaden their vivid im- pression ; the heart is moved by them when the eye contemplates them. Familiarity, moreover, engenders sympathy ; one cannot retrain insensible to the trials of a poor man to whom, for over twenty years, one says good-morning every day on passing him, with whose life one is acquainted, who is not an abstract unit in the imagination, a statistical cipher, but a sorrowing soul and \ suffering body. And so much the more because, since the writings of Rousseau and the economists, a spirit of humanity, daily growing stronger, more penetrating and more universal, has 36 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK i arisen to soften fc .e heart. Henceforth the poor are thought of; and it is esteemed an honor to think of them. We have only to read the memorials of the States-General l to see that the spirit of philanthropy spreads from Paris even to the chateaux and abbeys of the provinces. I am satisfied that, excepting scattered country squires, either huntsmen or drinkers, carried away by the need of physical exercise, and confined through their rusticity to an animal life, most of the resident seigniors resembled, in fact or in intention, the gentry whom Marmontel, in his moral tales, then brought on the stage ; for fashion took this direction, and people in France always follow the fashion. There is nothing feudal in their characters; they are "sen- sible" folks, mild, very courteous, tolerably cultivated, fond of generalities and easily and quickly roused and very much in earnest, like that amiable logician the Marquis de Ferrieres, an old light-horseman, deputy from Saumur in the National Assem- bly, author of an article on Theism, a moral romance and genial memoirs of no great importance; nothing could be more re- mote from the ancient harsh and despotic temperament. They would be glad to relieve the people and they try to favor them as much as they can. 2 They are found detrimental, but they are not wicked ; the evil is in their situation and not in their charac- ter. It is their situation, in fact, which, allowing them rights without exacting services, debars them from the public offices, the beneficial influence, the effective patronage by which they might justify their advantages and attach the peasantry to them. But on this ground the central government occupies their place. For a long time they are very feeble against the intendant, ut- terly powerless to protect their parish. Twenty gentlemen can- not assemble and deliberate without the king's special permis- sion. 3 If those of Franche-Comte" happen to dine together and hear a mass once a year, it is through tolerance, and even then this harmless coterie may assemble only in the presence of the intendant. Separated from his equals, the seignior again is sep- 1 On the conduct and sentiments of lay and ecclesiastical seigniors cf. Leonce de L vergne, "Les Assemblies provinciales," i vol. Legrand, " L'intendance du Hainaut," I roL Hippeau, " Le Gouvernement de Normandie," 9 vols. * " The most active sympathy filled their breasts ; that which an opulent man most dreaded was to be regarded as insensible." Lacretelle, voL V. p. a. 1 Floquet, "Histoire du Parlement de Normandie," vol. VI. p. 696. In 1772 twenty-fiv* (enCer.en ate imprisoned or exiled for having signed a protest against the orders c' tht Hart THAV. m. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 37 arated from his inferiors. The administration of a village is of no concern to him ; he has not even its superintendence. The apportionment of taxes, the militia contingent, the repairs of the church, the summoning and presiding over a parish assembly, the making of roads, the establishment of charity workshops, all this is the intendant's business or that of the communal officers which the intendant appoints or directs. 1 Except through his justiciary rights, so much curtailed, the seignior is an idler in public matters. 2 If, by chance, he should desire to act in an official capacity, to make some reclamation for the community, the bureaux of administration would soon close his mouth. Since Louis XIV., the clerks have things their own way ; all leg- islation and the entire administrative system operate against the local seignior to deprive him of his functional efficacy and to confine him to his naked title. Through this separation of func- tions and title his pride increases as he becomes less useful. His self-love, deprived of its broad pasture-ground falls back on a small one ; henceforth he seeks distinctions and not influence ; he thinks only of precedence and not of government. 3 In short, the local government, in the hands of clowns brutalized oy men of the pen, is a plebeian, scribbling affair which seems to him offensive. " His pride would be wounded if he were asked to attend to it. Raising taxes, levying the militia, regula- ting the corvees, are servile acts, the works of a syndic." He ac- cordingly abstains, remains isolated on his manor and leaves to others a task from which he is excluded and which he disdains. Far from protecting his peasantry he is scarcely able to protect himself, to preserve his immunities, to have his poll-tax and vingtiemes reduced, to obtain exemption from the militia for his domestics, and to keep his own person, dwelling, dependants, and hunting and fishing rights from the universal usurpation which places all possessions and all privileges in the hands of " Mon- seigneur 1'intendant" and Messieurs the sub-delegates. And 1 De Tocqueville, ibid. pp. 39, 56, 75, 119, 184. He has developed this point with admira- ble force and insight * De Tocqueville, ibid. p. 376. Complaints of the provincial assembly of Haute-Guyenne. " People complain daily that there is no police in the rural districts. How could there be one ? The noble takes no interest in anything, excepting a few just and benevolent seigniors who take advantage of their influence with their vassals to prevent affrays." 1 Records of the States-General of 1789. Many of the memorials of the noblesse consist of the requests by nobles, men and women, of some honorary distinctive mark, for instaiw ft cross or a ribbon which will make them recognizable. 38 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK J oftener is this the case because he is poor. Bouille estimates that all the old families, save two or three hundred, are ruined. 1 In Rouergue several of them live on an income of fifty and even twenty-five louis, (1000 and 500 francs). In Limousin, says an in- tendant at the beginning of the century, out of several thousands there are not fifteen who have twenty thousand livres income. In Berry, towards 1754, "three-fourths of them die of hunger." In Franche-Comte" the fraternity to which we have alluded, appears in a humorous light, "after the mass each one returning to his domicile, some on foot and others on their Rosinantes." In Brittany "there is a crowd of gentlemen cellar-rats on the farms in the lowest occupations." An M. de la Morandais becomes the overseer of an estate. A certain family with nothing but a small farm, " attests its nobility only by the dove-cote; it lives like the peasants, eating nothing but brown bread." Another gentleman, a widower, "passes his time in drinking, living licen- tiously with his servants and covering butter-pots with the hand- somest title-deeds of his lineage." "All the chevaliers de Chat- eaubriand," says the father, were drunkards and whippers of hares." He himself just makes shift to live in a miserable way, with five domestics, a hound and two old mares "in a chateau capable of accommodating a hundred seigniors with their suites." Here and there in the various memoirs we see these strange superannuated figures passing before the eye, for in- siance, in Burgundy, "gentlemen huntsmeu wearing gaiters and hob-nailed shoes, carrying an old rusty sword under their arms, .lying with hunger and refusing to work;" 2 elsewhere, "M. de Perignan, in dress attire, with sandy perruque and visage, hav- ing dry stone walls built on his domain, and getting intoxicated with the blacksmith of the place ; " related to Cardinal Fleury he is made the first Due de Fleury. Everything contributes to this downfall, the law, habits and customs, and, above all, the right of primogeniture. Instituted for the purpose of maintaining undivided sovereignty and pat- ronage it ruins the nobles since sovereignty and patronage have 1 De Bouilld, "Mmoires," p. 50. De Tocqu:ville, ibid. pp. 118, 119. De Lomenie, " Les Mirabeau," p. 132. A letter of the bailly of Mirabeau, 1760. De Chateaubriand, "Mmoires," I. 14, 15, 29, 76, 80, 125. Lucas de Montigny, " Memoires de Mirabeau," L 160. Reports of the Soci6t6 du Berry, " Bourges en 1753 et 1754," according to a diary (i> the national archives), written by one of the exiled parliamer tarians, p. 273. 1 "La vie de mon pere," by Rtif de la Bretonne, I. 146. CHAP. m. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 39 no material to work on. " In Brittany," says Chateaubriand, "the elder sons of the nobles swept away two-thirds of the property while the younger sons .shared in one-third of the paternal heritage." 1 Consequently, "the younger sons of younger sons soon come to the sharing of a pigeon, rabbit, hound and fowling-piece. The entire fortune of my grandfather did not exceed five thousand livres income, of which his elder son had two-thirds, three thousand three hundred livres, leaving one thousand six hundred and sixty-six livres for the three younger ones upon which sum the elder still had a precipui claim." 2 This fortune, which crumbles away and dies out, they neither know how, nor are they disposed, to restore by com- merce, manufactures or proper administration of it ; it would be derogatory. "High and mighty seigniors of dove-cote, frog- pond and rabbit-warren," the more substance they lack the more value they set on the name. Add to all this the winter sojourn in town, the ceremonial and expenses comportable with vanity and social requirements, and the visits to the governor and the intendant : a man must be either a German or an English- man to be able to pass three gloomy, rainy months in a castle or on a farm, alone, in companionship with rustics, at the risk of becoming as awkward and as fantastic as they. 3 They ac- cordingly run in debt, become involved, sell one piece of ground and then another piece : a good many alienate the whole, ex- cepting their small manor and their seigniorial dues, the cens and the lods etventes, and their hunting and justiciary rights on the territory of which they were formerly proprietors. 4 Since they must support themselves on these privileges they must necessarily enforce them, even when the privilege is burdensome, and even when the debtor is a poor man. How could they ' The rule is analogous with the other coutumes (common-law rules), of other places and specially in Paris. (Renauldon, ibid. p. 134.) * A sort of dower right * Mme. d'Oberkirk, " Memoires," I. 395. De BouillS, "Memoires," p. 50. According to him, "all the noble old families, except- .ng two or three hundred, were ruined. A larger portion of the great tided estates had be- come the appanage of financiers, merchants and their descendants. The fiefs, for the mos< part, were in the hands of the bourgeoisie of the towns." Le'once de Lavergne, "Econo- mic rurale en France," p. 26. "The greatest number vegetated in poverty in small country fiefs often not vorth more than 2,000 or 3,000 francs a year." In the apportionment of the Indemnity in 1025, many received less than 1,000 francs. The greater number of indemnities do not exceed 50,000 francs. "The throne," rays Mirabeau, "is surrot*rded only by ruined aobles." 40 THE ANCIENT REGIME. POOK I remit dues in grain and in wine when these con&itute their bread and wine for the entire year ? How could they dispense with the fifth and the fifth of the fifth (du quint et du requint) when this is the only coin they obtain? why, being needy, should they not be exacting ? Accordingly, in relation to the peasant, they are simply his creditors; and to this end comes the feudal regime transformed by the monarchy. Around the chateau I see sympathies declining, envy raising its head, and hatreds on the increase. Set aside in public matters, freed from taxation, the seignior remains isolated and a stranger among his vassals; his extinct authority with his unimpaired privileges form for him an existence apart. When he emerges from it, it is to forcibly add to the public misery. On this soil, ruined by the fisc, he takes a portion of its product, so much in sheaves of wheat and so many measures of wine. His pigeons and his game eat up the crops. People are obliged to grind in his mill, and to leave with him a sixteenth of the flour. The sale of a field for the sum of six hundred livres puts one hun- dred livres into his pocket. A brother's inheritance reaches a brother only after he has gnawed out of it a year's income. A score of other dues, formerly of public benefit, no longer serve but to support a useless private individual. The peasant, then as at the present day, eager for gain, determined and accustomed to do and to suffer everything to save or gain a crown, ends by bestowing side glances of anger on the turret in which is preserved the archives, the rent-roll, the detested parch- ments by means of which a man of another species, favored to the detriment of the rest, a universal creditor and paid to do nothing, grazes over all the ground and feeds on all the products. Let the opportunity come to enkindle all this covetousness and the rent-roll will burn and with it the turret, and with the turret, the chateau. III. The spectacle becomes still more gloomy, on passing from the estates on which the seigniors reside to those on which they are non-residents. Noble or ennobled, lay and ecclesiastic, the latte? are privileged among the privileged and form an aristocrac/ inside of an aristocracy. Almost all the powerful and accredited %milies belong to it whatever may be their origin and their CHAP. in. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 41 date. 1 Through their habitual or frequent residence near the court, through their alliances or mutual visits, through their habits and their luxuries, through the influence which they exercise and the enmities which they provoke, they form a group apart, and are those who possess the most extensive estates, the leading suzerainties, and the completest and most comprehensive jurisdictions. Of the court nobility and of the higher clergy, they number, perhaps, a thousand in each order, while their small number only brings out in higher relief the enormity of their advantages. We have seen that the appanages of the princes of the blood comprise a seventh of the territory ; Necker estimates the revenue of the estates enjoyed by the king's two brothers at two millions. 2 The domains of the Dues de Bouillon, d'Aiguillon, and some others cover entire leagues and in immensity and continuity, remind one of those which the Duke of Sutherland and the Duke of Bedford now possess in England. With nothing else than his forests and his canal, the Duke of Orleans, before marrying his wife, as rich as himself, obtains an income of a million. A certain seigniory, le Cler- montois, belonging to the Prince de Cond6, contains forty thousand inhabitants, which is the extent of a German principal- ity; "moreover all the taxes or subsidies occurring in le Cler- montois are imposed for the benefit of His Serene Highness, the king receiving absolutely nothing." 3 Naturally authority and wealth go together, and, the more an estate yields, the more its owner resembles a sovereign. The archbishop of Cambray, Due de Cambray, Comte de Cambresis, possesses the suzerainty over all the fiefs of a region which numbers over seventy- five thousand inhabitants; he appoints one-half of the alder- men of Cambray and the whole of the administrators of Ca- teau ; he has the nomination to two great abbeys, and pre- 1 De Bouill6, "M6moires," p. 50. Cherin, "Abreg6 chronologique des dits" (1788). " Of this innumerable multitude composing the privileged order scarcely a twentieth part of it can really pretend to nobility of an immemorial and ancient date." 4,070 financial, ad- ministrative, and judicial offices conferred nobility. Turgot, " Collection des Economistes," II. 276. " Through the facilities for acquiring nobility by means of money there is no rich man who does not at oice become noble." D'Argenson, " M6moires," III. 402. 2 Necker, "De 1'Administration des Finances," II. 271. Legrand, "L'Intendance de Hainaut," pp. 104, 118, 152, 412. 8 Even after the exchange of 1784, the prince retains for himself " ill personal imposition! as well as subventions on the inhabitants," except a sum of 6,000 liv ef for roads. Aichivet nationrJes, G, 192, a memorial of April i4th, 1781, on the state of th pgs in the Clernr jtois Report of the provincial assembly of the Three Bishoprics (1787), p 380. 4* 42 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK L sides over the provincial assemblies and the permanent bureau which succeeds them; in short, under the intendant, or at his side, he maintains a pre-eminence, and better still, an influence, somewhat like that to-day maintained over his domain by a grand-duke incorporated into the new German empire. Near him, in Hainaut, the abbe" of Saint-Amand possesses seven- eighths of the territory of the provostship while levying on the other eighth the seigniorial taxes of the corvees and the dime; and more besides, he nominates the provost of the al- dermen, so that, in the words of the grievances, "he composes the entire State, or rather he is himself the State." 1 I should never end if I were to specify all these big prizes. Let us select only those of the prelacy, and but one particular side, that of money. In the "Almanach Royal," and in "La France Ec- cle"siastique" for 1788, we may read their admitted revenues; but the veritable revenue is one-half more for the bishoprics, and double and triple for the abbeys; and we must again double the veritable revenue in order to estimate its value in the money of to-day. 2 The one hundred and thirty-one bishops and arch- bishops possess in the aggregate 5,600,000 livres of episcopal in- come and 1,200,000 livres in abbeys, averaging 50,000 livres per head as in the printed record, and in reality 100,000; a bishop thus, in the eyes of his contemporaries, according to the state- ment of spectators cognizant of the actual truth, was "a grand seignior, with an income of 100,000 livres." 3 Some of the most important sees are magnificently endowed. That of Sens brings in 70,000 livres; Verdun, 74,000; Tours, 82,000; Beauvais, Toulouse and Bayeux, 90,000; Rouen, 100,000; Auch, Metz and Albi, 120,000; Narbonne, 160,000; Paris and Cambray, 200,000 according to official reports, and probably half as much more in sums actually collected. Other sees, less lucrative, are, proportionately, still better provided. Imagine a small provincial town, oftentimes not even a petty sub-prefecture of our times, Conserans, Mirepoix, Lavaur, Rieux, Lombez, Saint-Papoul, Comminges, Lu$on, Sarlat, Mende, Frejus, Lescar, Belley, Saint- Malo, Tre"guier, Embrun, Saint-Claude, and, in the neighbor- hood, less than two hundred, one hundred, and sometimes even 1 The town of St. Amand, alone, contain? to-day 10,210 inhabitants. 2 See note 3 at the end of the volume. * De Ferrieres, "Me'moires," II. 57. "All had 100,000. some zoo, 300, and even CHAP. III. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 43 less than fifty parishes, and, as recompense for this slight ecaesi- astical surveillance, a prelate receiving from 25,000 to 70,000 livres, according to official statements; from 37,000 to- 105,000 livres in actual receipts; and from 74,000 to 105,000 livres in the money of to-day. As to the abbeys, I count thirty- three of them producing to the abb6 from 25,000 to i2:,ooo livres, and twenty-seven which bring from 20,000 to icc,ooo livres to the abbess ; weigh these sums taken from the Almanach, and bear in mind that they must be doubled, and more, to obtain the real revenue, and be quadrupled, and more, to obtain the actual revenue. It is evident, that, with such revenues, coupled with the feudal rights, police, justiciary and administrative, which accompany them, an ecclesiastic or lay grand seignior is, in fact, a sort of prince in his district ; that he bears too close a resemblance to the ancient sovereign to be entitled to live as an ordinary individual ; that his private ad- vantages impose on him a public character; that his rank, and his enormous profits, make it incumbent on him to perform proportionate services, and that, even under the sway of the intendant, he owes to his vassals, to his tenants, to his feudato- ries the support of his mediation, of his patronage and of his gains. This requires a home residence, but, generally, he is an ab- sentee. For a hundred and fifty years a kind of all-powerful attraction diverts the grandees from the provinces and impels them towards the capital ; and the movement is irresistible for it is the effect of two forces, the greatest and most universal that influence mankind, one, a social position, and the other the national character. A tree is not to be severed from its roots with impunity. An aristocracy organized to rule becomes de- tached from the soil when it no longer rules; and it ceases to rule the moment when, through increasing and constant en- croachments, almost the entire justiciary, the entire administra- tion, the entire police, each detail of the local or general gov- ernment, the power of initiating, of collaboration, of control regarding taxation, elections, roads, public works and charities, passes over into the hands of the intendant or of the sub-delegate, under the supreme direction of the comptroller-general or of the king's council. 1 Clerks, gentiy "of the robe and the quill,' 1 De Tocqueville, ibid, book 2, chap. 2. p. 182. Letter of the bailly of Mirabesti, AugusJ t^, 1770. " This feudal order wai merely vigorous, and they have pronounced it ba barcus 44 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK I. plebeians enjoying no consideration, perform the work ; there is no way to prevent it. Even with the king's delegates, a pro- vincial governor, were he hereditary, a prince of the blood, like the Conde"s in Burgundy, must efface himself before the intendant ; he holds no efficient office ; his public duties consist of self-parade and in giving entertainments. And yet he would badly perform others ; the administrative machine, with its thou- sands of hard, creaking and dirty wheels, as Richelieu and Louis XIV. fashioned it, can work only in the hands of workmen re- movable at pleasure, unscrupulous and prompt to give way to the judgment of the State. It is impossible to commit oneself with rogues of that description. He accordingly abstains, and abandons public affairs to them. Unemployed, enervated, what could he now do on his domain, where he no longer reigns, and where dulness overpowers him ? He betakes himself to the city, and especially to the court. After all, this is the only career open to him ; to be successful he has to become a courtier. It is the will of the king, one must frequent his apartments to ob- tain his favors; otherwise, on the first application for them the answer will be, " Who is he? He is a man that I never see." In his eyes there is no excuse for absence, even when the cause is a conversion, with penitence for a motive ; God is preferred to him and it is desertion. The ministers write to the intend- ants to ascertain if the gentlemen of their province "like to stay at home," and if they " refuse to appear and perform their duties to the king." Consider how great the attraction was ; govern- ments, commands, bishoprics, benefices, court-offices, survivor- ships, pensions, credit, favors of every kind and degree for self and family, all that a State of twenty or twenty-five millions of men can offer that is desirable to ambition, to vanity, to interest, is found here collected as in a reservoir. They rush to it and draw from it. And the more readily because it is an agreeable place, arranged just as they would have it, and purposely to suit the because France, which had the vices of strength has only those of feebleness, and because the flock which was formerly devoured by wolves is now eaten up with lice. . . . Three or four kicks or blows with a stick were not half so injurious to a poor man's family, nor ta himself, as being devoured by six rolls of handwriting." "The nobility," says St Simon, In his day, " has become another people with no choice left it but to crouch down in mortal and ruinous indolence, which renders it a charge and contemptible, or to go and be killed in warfare subject to the insults of clerks, secretaries of the state and the secretaries of in. tendants." Such are the complaints of feudal spirits. The details which follow are al derived from Saint Simon, Dangeau, de Luynes, d'Argenson and other court historians. CHAP. in. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 45 social aptitudes of the French character. The court is a vast permanent drawing-room to which " access is easy and free to the king's subjects ; " where they live with him, " in gentle and virtuous society in spite of the almost infinite distance of rank and power ; " where the monarch prides himself on being the per- fect master of a household. 1 In fact, no drawing-room was ever so well kept up, nor so well calculated to retain its guests by every kind of enjoyment, by the beauty, the dignity and the charm of its decoration, by the selection of its company and by the interest of the spectacle. Versailles is the only place to show oneself off, to make a figure, to push one's way, to be amused, to converse or gossip at the head-quarters of news, of activity and of public matters, with the elite of the kingdom and the arbiters of fashion, elegance and taste; "Sire," said M. de Vardes to Louis XIV., "away from Your Majesty one not only feels mis- erable but ridiculous." None remain in the provinces except the poor rural nobility; to live there one must be behind the age, disheartened or in exile. The king's banishment of a seignior to his estates is the highest disgrace; to the humiliation of this fall is added the insupportable weight of ennui. The finest chat- eau on the most beautiful site is a frightful " desert "; nobody is seen there save the grotesques of z small town or the village rus- tics. 2 " Exile alone," says Arthur Young, " forces the French oobility to do what the English prefer to do, and that is to live on their estates and embellish them." Saint-Simon and other court historians, on mentioning a ceremony, repeatedly state that "all France was there"; in fact, every one of consequence in France is there, and each recognizes the other by this sign. Paris and the court becomes, accordingly, the necessary sojourn of all fine people. In such a situation departure begets depart- ure; the more a province is forsaken the more they forsake it. " There is not in the kingdom," says the Marquis of Mirabeau, " a single estate of any size of which the proprietor is not in Paris and who, consequently, neglects his buildings and chateaux." 1 1 Works of Louis XIV. and his own words. Mme. Vig6e-Lebrun, " Souvenirs," I. 71 : " I have seen the queen (Marie Antoinette), obliging Madame to dine, then six years of ge, with a little peasant girl whora she vas taking care of, and insisting that this little on* ihould be served first, saying to her daughter : 'You must do the honors.' " * Moliere, "Misanthrope." This is the " iesert" in which Celimeue refuses to be buried with Alceste. See also in the "Tartuffe " the pictu - e which Dorine 'Vaws of a small town Arthur Young, " Voyages en France," I. 78. * "Trait6 de la Population," p. 108, (1756). 46 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK L The lay grand seigniors have their hotels in the capital, their en- tresol at Versailles, and their pleasure-house within a circuit of twenty leagues ; if they visit their estates at long intervals, it is to hunt. The fifteen hundred commendatory abbe's and priors enjoy their benefices as if they were so many remote farms. The two thousand seven hundred vicars and canons visit each other and dine out. With the exception of a few apostolic characters the one hundred and thirty-one bishops stay at home as little as they can; nearly all of them being nobles, all of them men of society, what could they do out of the world, confined to a pro- vincial town ? Can we imagine a grand seignior, once a gay and galla-nt abb6 and now a bishop with a hundred thousand livres income, voluntarily burying himself for the entire year at Mende, at Comminges, in a paltry cloister ? The interval has become too great between the refined, varied and literary life of the great centre, and the monotonous, inert, practical life of the prov- inces. Hence it is that the grand seignior who withdraws from the former cannot enter into the latter, and he remains an ab- sentee, at least in feeling. A country in which the heart ceases to impel the blood through its veins presents a sombre aspect. Arthur Young, who travelled over France between 1787 and 1789, is surprised to find at once such a vital centre and such dead extremities. Be- tween Paris and Versailles the double file of vehicles going and coming extends uninterruptedly for five leagues from morning till night. 1 The contrast on other roads is very great. Leav- ing Paris by the Orleans road, says Arthur Young, " we met not one stage or diligence for ten miles ; only two messageries and very few chaises, not a tenth of what would have been met had we been leaving London at the same hour." On the highroad near Narbonne, " for thirty-six miles," he says, " I came across but one cabriolet, half a dozen carts and a few women leading asses." Elsewhere, near St. Girons, he notices that in two hun- dred and fifty miles he encountered in all, "two cabriolets and three miserable things similar to our old one-horse post chaise, and not one gentleman." Throughout this country the inns are execrable ; it is impossible to hire a wagon, while in England, even in a town of fifteen hundred or two thousand inhabitants, ' I have this from old people who witnessed it before 1789. CHAP. ni. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 47 there are comfortable hotels and every means of transport This proves that in France "there is no circulation." It is only in very large towns that there is any civilization and comfort. At Nantes there is a superb theatre " twice as large as Drury- Lane and five times as magnificent. Mon Dieu / I cried to my- self, do all these wastes, the deserts, the heath, ling, furze, broom, and bog, that I have passed for 300 miles lead to this spectacle? . . . You pass at once from beggary to profusion, . . . the country deserted, or if a gentleman in it, you find him in some wretched hole to save that money which is lavished with profusion in the luxuries of a capital." "A coach," says M. de Montlosier, "set out weekly from the principal towns in the provinces for Paris and was not always full, which represents the activity in business. There was a single journal called the Gazette de France, appearing twice a week, which represents the activity of minds." : Some of the magistrates of Paris in exile at Bourges in 1753 and 1754, give the following picture of that place. "A town in which no one can be found with whom you can talk at your ease on any topic whatever, reasonably or sen- sibly; nobles, three-fourths of them dying of hunger, rotting with pride of birth, keeping apart from men of the robe and of finance, and finding it strange that the daughter of a tax-col- lector, married to a counsellor of the parliament of Paris, should presume to be intelligent and entertain company; citizens of the grossest ignorance, the sole support of this species of leth- argy in which the minds of most of the inhabitants are plunged; women, bigoted and pretensions, ind much given to play and to gallantry;" 2 in this impoverished and benumbed society, among these Messieurs Thibaudeau the counsellor and Harpin the tax- collector, among these vicomtes of Sotenville and Countesses d'Escarbagnas, lives the Archbishop, Cardinal de Larochefou- cauld, grand almoner to the king, provided with four great ab- beys, possessing five hundred thousand livres income, a man of the world, generally an absentee, and when at home, finding amusement in the embellishing of his gardens and palace, in short, the golden pheasant of an aviary in a poultry yard of geese. 3 Naturally there is an entire absence of political thought. 1 "Me'moires de M. de Montlosier," I. p. 161. * Reports of the Sooie'tcS de Berry, "Bourges en 1753 et 1754," p. 273. * Ibid. p. 271 One day the cardinal, showing his guests over his palace just completed, fed them to th bottom of a corridor where he had placed water clofteU, at that time 48 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK L * You cannot imagine," says the manuscript, " a person more in- different to all public matters." At a later period, in the very midst of events of the gravest character, and which most nearly concern them, there is the same apathy. At Chateau-Thierry, on the 4th of July, 1789,' there is not a caf6 in which a news- paper can be found; there is but one at Dijon; at Moulins, the 7th of August, "in the best cafe" in the town, where I found near twenty tables set for company, but as for a newspaper I might as well have demanded an elephant." Between Stras- bourg and Besangon there is not a gazette. At Besancon there is " nothing but the Gazette de France, for which, at this period, a man of common sense would not give one sol, ... and the Courier de r Europe a fortnight old; and well- dressed people are now talking of the news of two or three weeks past and plainly by their discourse know nothing of what is passing." At Clermont " I dined, or supped, five times at the table d'h6te with from twenty to thirty merchants, trades- men, officers, etc., and it is not easy for me to express the insig- nificance, the inanity of their conversation. Scarcely any pol- itics at a moment when every bosom ought to beat with none but political sensations. The ignorance or the stupidity of these people must be absolutely incredible ; not a week passes with- out their country abounding with events that are analyzed and debated by the carpenters and blacksmiths of England." The cause of this inertia is manifest ; interrogated on their opinions, all reply : " We are of the provinces and we must wait to know what is going on in Paris." Never having acted, they do not know how to act. But, thanks to this inertia, they let them- selves be driven. The provinces form an immense stagnant pond, which, by a terrible inundation, may be emptied exclu- sively on one side, and suddenly; the fault lies with the engi- neers who failed to provide it with either dikes or outlets. Such is the languor or, rather, the prostration, into which loca] life falls when the local chiefs deprive it of their presence, action, novelty. M. Boutin de la Coul Mnmiere, the son of a receiver-general of the finances, mad* an exclamation at the sight of the ingenious mechanism which it pleased him to keep moving, and, turning towards the abb de Caniilac, he says: "That is really admirable, bul what seems to me still more admirable is that His Eminence, being above all human weak' ness, should condescend to make use of it." This anecdote is valuable, as it serves to llustrate the rank and position of a grand-seignior prelate in the provinces. 1 Arthur Young, v. II. p. 330 and the following pages. CHAP. Hi. THE STRUCTURE. OF SOCIETY. 49 or sympathy. I find only three or four grand seigniors taking a part in it, practical philanthropists following the example of English noblemen; the Due d'Harcourt, who settles the law- suits of his peasants; the Due de Larochefoucauld-Liancourt who establishes a model farm on his domain, and a school of in dustrial pursuits for the children of poor soldiers; and the Comte de Brienne, whose thirty villages are to demand liberty of the Convention. 1 The rest, for the most part liberals, content them- selves with discussions on public affairs and on political econo- my. In fact, the difference in manners, the separation of inter- ests, the remoteness of ideas are so great that contact between those most exempt from haughtiness and their immediate ten- antry is rare, and at long intervals. Arthur Young, needing some information at the house of the Due de Larochefoucauld him- self, the steward is sent for. " At an English nobleman's, there would have been three or four farmers asked to meet me who would have dined with the family amongst the ladies of the first rank. I do not exaggerate when I say that I have had this at least an hundred times in the first houses of our islands. It is, however, a thing that in the present style of manners in France would not be met with from Calais to Bayonne except, by chance, in the house of some great lord that had been much in England, and then not unless it was asked for. The nobility in France have no more idea of practising agriculture, and making it a subject of conversation, except on the mere theory, as they would speak of a loom or a bowsprit, than of any other object the most remote from their habits and pursuits." Through tradi- tion, fashion and deliberately, they are, and wish only to be, people of society; their sole concern is to talk and to hunt. Never have the leaders of men so unlearned the art of leading men ; the art which consists of marching along the same pathway with them but at the head, and directing their labor by sharing in it. Our Englishman, an eye-witness and competent, again writes : "Thus it is whenever you stumble on a grand seignior, even one 1 De Lom^nie, "Les Mirabeau," p. 134. A letter of the bailly September 25, 1760: "I am at Harcourt, where I admire the master's honest, benevolent greatness. You cannot imagine toy pleasure on fete days at seeing the people everywhere around the chateau, and the good little peasant boys and girls looking right in the face of their good landlord and almost pulling his watch off to examine the trinkets on the chain, and all with a frater- nal air, without familiarity. The good duke does not allow his vassals to go to law; L listens to them and decides for them, humoring them with admirable patience." Lacrctclic, "Dix ans d'e'preuve," p. 58. 50 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK U that was worth millions, you are sure to find his property deseiL Those of the Due de Bouillon and of the Prince de Soubise are two of the greatest 'properties in France; and all the signs I have yet seen of their greatness are wastes, landes, deserts, fern, ling. Go to their residence, wherever it may be and you would prob- ably find them in the midst of a forest very well peopled with deer, wild boars and wolves." " The great proprietors," says another contemporary, 1 " attracted to and kept in our cities by luxurious enjoyments know nothing of their estates," save "of their agents whom they harass for the support of a ruinous os- tentation. How can ameliorations be looked for from those who even refuse to keep things up and make indispensable repairs?" A sure proof that their absence is the cause of the evil is found in the visible difference between the domain worked under an absent abbe"-commendatory and a domain superintended by monks living on the spot. "The intelligent traveller recognizes it " at first sight by the state of cultivation. " If he finds fields well enclosed by ditches, carefully planted, and covered with rich crops, these fields, he says to himself, belong to the monks. Almost always, alongside of these fertile plains, is an area of ground badly tilled and almost barren, presenting a painful con- trast; and yet the soil is the same, being two portions of the same domain ; he sees that the latter is the portion of the abb6 commendatory." "Theabbatial manse," said Lefranc de Pom- pignan, "frequently looks like the patrimony of a spendthrift ; the monastic manse is like a patrimony whereon nothing is neglected for its amelioration," to such an extent that "the two-thirds" which the abb6 enjoys bring him less than the third reserved by his monks. The ruin or impoverishment of agriculture is, again, one of the effects of absenteeism; there was, perhaps, one-third of the soil in France, which, deserted as in Ireland, was as badly tilled, as little productive as in Ireland in the hands of the rich absentees, the English bishops, deans and nobles. Doing nothing for the soil how could they do anything for men? Now and then, undoubtedly, especially with farms that pay no rent, the steward writes a letter, alleging the misery of the farmer. There is no doubt, also, and especially for thirty years back, they desire to be humane; they descant among themselves ' "De l'tat religieux," by the abbes de Bonnefoi et Bernard, 1784, pp. 287, api. CHAP. in. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 51 about the rights of man; the sight of the pale face of a hungry peasant would give them pain. But they never see him; does it ever occur to them to fancy what it is like under the awkward and complimentary phrases of their agent? Moreover, do they know what hunger is? Who amongst them has had any rural experiences? And how could they picture to themselves the misery of this forlorn being ? They are too remote from him to do that, too ignorant of his mode of life. The portrait they conceive of him is imaginary; never was there a falser repre sentation of the peasant ; accordingly the awakening is to be ter- rible. They view him as the amiable swain, gentle, humble and grateful, simple-hearted and right-minded, easily led, being con- ceived according to Rousseau and the idyls performed at this very epoch in all private drawing-rooms. 1 Lacking a knowledge of him they overlook him; they read the steward's letter and immediately the whirl of high life again seizes them and, after a sigh bestowed on the distress of the poor, they make up their minds that their income for the year will be short. A disposi- tion of this kind is not favorable to charity. Accordingly, complaints arise, not against the residents but against the absentees. 2 " The possessions of the Church, says a memorial, serve only to nourish the passions of their holders." " According to the canons, says another memorial, every beneficiary must give a quarter of his income to the poor; nevertheless in our parish there is a revenue of more than twelve thousand livres, and none of it is given to the poor unless it is some small matter at the hands of the curate." "The abbe" de Conches gets one- half of the tithes and contributes nothing to the relief of the parish." Elsewhere, " the chapter of Ecouis, which owns the benefice of the tithes is of no advantage to the poor, and only seeks to augment its income." Near by, the abbe" of Croix-Leu- froy, " a heavy tithe-owner, and the abbe" de Bernay, who gets fifty- seven thousand livres from his benefice, and who is a non- resident, keep all and scarcely give enough to their officiating curates to keep them alive." " I have in my parish, says a cur- ate of Berry, 3 six simple benefices of which the titularies are al- 1 See on this subject "La partie de chasse de Henri IV.," by Coll6. Cf. Berquin, Florian, Marmontel, etc., and likewise the engravings of that day. * Boivin-Champeaux, " Notice historique sur la Revolution dans le dcpartement de 1'Eure," pp. 63, 61. Archives nation les, Reports of the States-General of 1789, T, XXXIX., p. in. Letta 52 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK i. ways absent, and they enjoy together an income of nine thou- sand livres; I sent them in writing the most urgent entreaties during the calamity of the past year; I received from one of them two louis only, and most of them did not even answer me.' Stronger is the reason for a conviction that in ordinary times they will make no remission of their dues. Moreover, these dues, the censives, the lods et ventes, tithes, and the like, are in the hands of a steward, and he is a good steward who returns a large amount of money. He has no right to be generous at his mas- ter's expense, and he is tempted to turn the subjects of his mas- ter to his own profit. In vain might the soft seignorial hand be disposed to be easy or paternal; the hard hand of the proxy bears down on the peasants with all its weight, and the cautious- ness of a chief gives place to the exactions of a clerk. How is it then when, instead of a clerk on the domain, a fermier is found, an adjudicator who, for an annual sum, purchases of the seignior the management and product of his dues? In the election of Mayenne, 1 and certainly also in many others, the principal domains are rented in this way. Moreover there are a number of dues, like the tolls, the market-place tax, that on the flock apart, the monopoly of the oven and of the mill which can scarcely be managed otherwise ; the seignior must necessa- rily employ an adjudicator who spares him the disputes and the trouble of collecting. 2 In this case, so frequent, the pressure and the rapacity of the contractor, who is determined to gain or, at least, not to lose, falls on the peasantry : " He is a ravenous wolf," says Renauldon, " let loose on the estate, who draws upon it to the last sou, who crushes the subjects, reduces them to beg- gary, forces the cultivators to desert, and renders odious the master who finds himself obliged to tolerate his exactions to be able to profit by them." Imagine, if you can, the evil which a country usurer exercises, armed against them with such bur- densome rights; it is the feudal seigniory in the hands of Har- pagon, or rather of old Grandet. When, indeed, a tax becomes insupportable we see, by the local complaints, that it is nearly f the 6th March, 1789, from the curat: of St. Pierre de Ponsigny, In Berry. D'Argenson, 6th July, 1756. "The late cardinal de Soubise had three millions in cash and he gav nothing to the poor." 1 De Tocqueville, ibid. 405. Renauldon, ibid. 628. 2 The example is set by the king who sells to the farmer-generals, for an anr lal su JO, th management and product of the principal indirect taxes. CHAP. HI. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 53 always z.fermier who enforces it : l it is one of these, acting for a body of canons, who claims Jeanne Mermet's paternal inheritance on the pretence that she had passed her wedding night at her husband's house. It would be difficult to find parallel exactions in the Ireland of 1830, on those estates where, the farmer-gen- eral renting to sub-farmers, and the latter to others still below them, the poor tenant at the foot of the ladder himself bore the full weight of it, so much the more crushed because his creditor, crushed himself, measured the requirements he exacted by those he had to submit to. Suppose that, seeing this abuse of his name, the seignior is de- sirous of withdrawing the administration of his domains from these mercenary hands ; in most cases he is unable to do it : he is too deeply in debt, having appropriated to his creditors a cer- tain portion of his land, a certain branch of his income. For centuries, the nobles are involved through their luxuriousness, their prodigality, their carelessness, and through that false sense of honor which consists in looking upon attention to accounts as the occupation of an accountant. They take pride in their negligence, regarding it, as they say, living nobly. 2 " Monsieur the archbishop," said Louis XVI. to M. de Dillon, " they say that you are in debt, and even largely." "Sire," replied the prelate, with the irony of a grand seignior, " I will ask my intend- ant and inform Your Majesty." Marshal de Soubise has five hundred thousand livres income, which is not sufficient for him. We know the debts of the Cardinal de Rohan and of the Comte d'Artois ; their millions of income were vainly thrown into this gulf. The Prince de Guem6n6e fails on an indebtedness of thirty-five millions. The Duke of Orleans, the richest proprietor in the kingdom, owed at his death seventy-four millions. When it became necessary to pay the creditors of the emigrants out of the proceeds of their possessions, it was proved that most of the 1 Voltaire, "Politique et Legislation, La voix du Cure 1 ," (in relation to the serfs of St. Claude). A speech of the Duke d'Aiguillon, August 4th, 1789, in the National Assembly: "The proprietors of fiefs, of seigniorial estates, are rarely guilty of the excesses of whicfr their vassals complain ; but their agents are often pitiless." 1 Beugnot, " Memoires," r. I. p. 136. Due de Levis, " Souvenirs et portraits," p. 156^ " Moniteur," the session of November 22, 1872, M. Bocher says : "According to the state- ment drawn up by order of the Convention the Duke of Orleans's fortune consisted of 74,000,000 of indebtedness and 140,000,000 of assets. On the 8th January, T"p2, he h*4 usigned to his creditors 38,000,000 to obtain his dischaige." 5* 54 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK i large fortunes were eaten up with mortgages. 1 Readers of the various memoirs know that, for two hundred years, the deficien- cies had to be supplied by marriages for money and by the favors of the king. This explains why, following the king's ex- ample, the nobles converted everything into money, and espe- cially the places at their disposition, and, in relaxing authority for profit, why they alienated the last fragment of government remaining in their hands. Everywhere they thus laid aside the venerated character of a chief to put on the odious character of a trafficker. " Not only," says a contemporary, 2 " do they give no pay to their officers of justice, or take them at a discount, but, what is worse, the greater portion of them make a sale of these offices." In spite of the edict of 1693, the judges thus ap- pointed take no steps to be admitted into the royal courts and they take no oaths. " What is the result ? Justice, too often administered by knaves, degenerates into brigandage or into a frightful impunity." Ordinarily the seignior who sells the office on a financial basis, deducts, in addition, the hundredth, the fif- tieth, the tenth of the price, when it passes into other hands ; and at other times he disposes of the survivorship. He creates these offices and survivorships purposely to sell them. " All the seigniorial courts, say the memorials, are infested with a crowd of officials of every description, seigniorial sergeants, mounted and unmounted officers, keepers of the provostship of the funds, guards of the constabulary; it is by no means rare to find as many as ten in an arrondissement which could hardly maintain two if they confined themselves within the limits of their duties." Also "they are at the same time judges, attorneys, fiscal-attor- neys, registrars, notaries," each in a different place, each prac- tising in several seigniories under various titles, all perambulat- ing, all in league like thieves at a fair, and assembling together in the taverns to plan, prosecute and decide. Sometimes the seignior, to economize, confers the title on one of his own de- pendants: "At Hautemont, in Hainaut, the fiscal-attorney is a domestic." More frequently he intrusts it to some starveling advocate of a petty village in the neighborhood on wages which 1 In 1785, the Duke de Choiseul in his testament estimated his property at fourteen millions and his debts at ten millions. Corate de Tilly, "M6moires," II. 215. * Renauldon, ibid. 45, 52,628. Duvergier, " Collection des Lois," II. 391; law of August 31; October 18, 1792. Memorial of a magistrate of the Chatelet on se gniorial court! (1789), p. 29. Leg! ir*4, "1'Intendance du Hainan," p. 119. CHAP. in. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 55 "would not suffice to keep him alive a week." He indennifies himself out of the peasants. Processes of chicanery, delays and wilful complications in the proceedings, sittings at three livres the hour for the advocate, and three livres the hour for the bailly : the black brood of judicial leeches suck so much the more eagerly, because the more numerous, a still more meagre prey, having paid for the privilege of sucking it. 1 The arbitrariness. the corruption, the laxity of such a regime can be divined. " Impunity," says Renauldon, " is nowhere greater than in the seigniorial tribunals. . . . There is no investigation into the foul- est crimes," for the seignior dreads supplying the means for a crimina 1 trial, while his judges or prosecuting attorneys fear that they will not be paid for their proceedings. Moreover, his jail is often a cellar under the chateau ; " there is not one tribunal out of a hundred in conformity with the law on the side of prisons ; " their keepers shut their eyes or stretch out their hands. Hence it is that "his estates become the refuge of all the scoundrels in the canton." The effect of his indifference is terrible and it is to react against him : to-morrow, at the club, the attorneys whom be has multiplied will demand his head, and the bandits whom he has tolerated will place it on the end of a pike. One point remains, the chase, wherein the noble's jurisdiction is still active and severe, and it is just the point which is found the most offensive. Formerly, when one-half of the canton con- sisted of forest, or waste land, while the other half was being ravaged by wild beasts, he was justified in reserving the right to hunt them; it entered into his function as local captain. He was the hereditary gendarme, always armed, always on horse- back, as well against wild boars and wolves as against rovers and brigands. Now that nothing is left to him of the gendarme but the title and the epaulettes he maintains his privilege through tra- dition, thus converting a service into an annoyance. Hunt he must, and he must hunt by himself; it is a physical necessity and, at the same time, a sign of his blood. A Rohan, a Dillon, chases the stag although belonging to the church, in spite of edicts Archives nationales, H, 614 ("M6moire" by Ren6 de Hauteville, advocate to the Parliament, Saint-Brieuc, October 5, 1776.) In Brittany the number of seigniorial courts Is immense, the pleaders being obliged to pass through four or five jurisdictions before reach- ing the Parliament " Where is justice rendered ? In the cabaret, in the tavern, where, in the bosom of intoxication and dcba 1 ichery, the judge sells justice to whoever pays the most 'or it" 56 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK I. and in spite of the canons. "You hunt too much," said Louis XV., 1 to the latter; "I know something about it. How can you prohibit your curates from hunting if you pass your life in setting them such an example ? Sire, for my curates the chase is a fault, for myself it is the fault of my ancestors." When the self- love of caste thus mounts guard over a right it is with obstinate vigilance. Accordingly, their captains of the chase, their game- keepers, their wood-rangers, their forest- wardens protect brutes as if they were men and men as if they were brutes. In the baili- wick of Pont-1'Ev^que in 1789 four instances are cited "of recent assassinations committed by the game-keepers of Mme. d'A , Mme. N , a prelate and a marshal of France, on ple- beians caught breaking the game laws or carrying guns. All four publicly escape punishment." In Artois, a parish makes declaration that "on the lands of the chattellany the game de- vours all the avetis (pine saplings) and that the growers of them will be obliged to abandon their business." Not far off, al Rumancourt, at Bellone, "the hares, rabbits and partridges en- tirely devour them, Count d'Oisy never hunting nor having, hunts." In twenty villages in the neighborhood around Oisy where he hunts it is on horseback and across the crops. " His game-keepers, always armed, have killed several persons unde* the pretence of watching over their master's rights. . . . The game, which greatly exceeds that of the royal captainries, con- sumes annually all prospects of a crop, twenty thousand raztires of wheat and as many of other grains." In the bailiwick of Evreux "the game has just destroyed everything up to the very houses. . . . On account of the game the citizen is not free to pull up the weeds in summer which clog the grain and injure the seed sown. . . . How many women are there without husbands, and children without fathers, on account of a poor hare or rab- bit ! " The game-keepers of the forest of Goufrray in Nor- mandy " are so terrible that they maltreat, insult and kill men. ... I know of farmers who, having pleaded against the lady to he indemnified for the loss of their wheat, not only lost their time but their crops and the expenses of the trial. . . . Stags and deer are seen roving around our houses in open daylight." In the bailiwick of Domfront, "the inhabitants of more than ten parishes are obliged to watch all night for more than six months 1 Beugnot, " Mmoires," vol. I. p. 35. CHAP. in. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 57 of the year in order to preserve their crops. " 1 Such is the effect of the right of the chase in the provinces. The most deplorable spectacle, however, is in the Ile-de-France, where the captain- ries abound and increase in size. A proces-verbal shows that in the parish of Vaux alone, near Meulan, the rabbits of the neigh- boring warrens ravaged eight hundred arpents of cultivated ground, and destroyed the crops of two thousand fou-r hundred sellers (three acres each), that is to say, the supply of food for one year of eight hundred persons. Not far off, at La Ro- chette, herds of deer and stags devour everything on the fields during the day, and, at night, even invade the small gardens of the inhabitants, consuming their vegetables and breaking down their young trees. It is found impossible to gather in the crops of vegetables in any territory subject to a captainry, except in gardens protected by high walls. At Farcy, of five hundred peach trees planted in a vineyard and browsed on by stags, only twenty remain at the end of three years. Over the whole territory of Fontainebleau, the commu- nities, to save their vines, are obliged to maintain, with the assent always of the captainry, a gang of watchmen who, with licensed dogs, keep watch and make a hubbub all night from the first of May to the middle of October. At Chartrettes the deer cross the Seine, approach the doors of the Comtesse de Laroche- foucauld and destroy entire plantations of poplars. A domain rented for two thousand livres brings in only four hundred after the establishment of the captainry of Versailles. In short, eleven regiments of an enemy's cavalry, quartered on the eleven captainries near the capital, and starting out daily to forage, could not do more mischief. We need not be surprised if, in the neighborhood of these lairs, the people become weary of culti- vating. 2 Near Fontainebleau and Melun, at Bois-le-Roi, three- 1 Boivin-Champeaux, ibid. 48. Renauldon, 26, 416. Manuscript reports of the States- General (Archives rationales) t. CXXXII. pp. 896 and 901. Hippeau, " Le Gouvemement de Normandie," VII. 61, 74. P6rin, " La Jeunesse de Robespierre," pp. 314-324. " Essai sui es capitaineries royales et autres," (1789) passim. De Lome'nie, " Beaumarchais et son temps," I. 125. Beaumarchais having purchased the office of lieutenant-general of the :hase in the bailiwicks of the Louvre warren (twelve to fifteen leagues in circumference) tries delinquents under this title. July isth, 1766, he sentences Ragondet, a farmer, to a fine of one hundred livres together with the demolition of the walls around an enclosure, also of his shed newly built without license, as tending to restrict the pleasures of the king. * LVArgenson, "Mfimoires," ed. Rathery, January 21, 1757. "The sieur de Montmorin, captain of the game-preserves of Fontainebleau, derives from his office enormous sums, and behaves himself like a brigand. The population of more than a hundred villages around to longer sow their land, the fruits and grain being eaten by deer, stags and other gam* 58 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK I quarters of the ground remains waste ; almost al the houses in Brolle are in ruins, only half-crumbling gables being visible ; at Coutilles and at Chapelle-Rablay, five farms are abandoned; at Arbonne, numerous fields are neglected ; at Villiers, and at Dame-Marie, where there were four farming companies and a number of special cultures, eight hundred arpents remain un- tilled. Strange to say, as the century becomes more polished the system of the chase becomes more imperious. The officers of the captainry are zealous because they labor under the eye and for the "pleasures" of their master. In 1789, eight hun- dred preserves had just been planted in one 'ingle canton of the captainry of Fontainebleau, and in spite of the proprietors of the soil. According to the regulations of 1762 every private in- dividual domiciled on the reservation of a captainry is inter- dicted from enclosing his homestead or any ground whatever with hedges or ditches, or walls without a special permit. In case of a permit being given he must leave a wide, open, and continuous space in order to let the huntsmen easily pass through. He is not allowed to keep any ferret, any fire-arm, any instrument adapted to the chase, nor to be followed by any dog even if not trained for it, unless the dog be held by a leash or clog fastened around its neck. And better still. He is for- bidden to reap his meadow or his luzerne before St. John's day, to enter his own field between the first of May and the twenty- fourth of June, to visit any island in the Seine, to cut grass on it or osiers, even if the grass and osiers belong to him. The rea- son is, that now the partridge is hatching and the legislator protects it ; he would take less pains for a woman in confine- ment; the old chroniclers would say of him, as with William Rufus, that his bowels are paternal only for animals. Now, in France, four hundred square leagues of territory are subject to the control of the captainries, and, over all France, game, large or small, is the tyrant of the peasant. The conclusion is, rather, listen to the people's conclusion. " Every time," says M. Montlosier, in 1789, "that I chanced to encounter herds of deer They keep only a few vines which they preserve six months of the year by mounting guard day and night with drums, making a general turmoil to frighten off the destructive animals." January 23, 1753. "M. le Prince de Conti has established a captainry of eleven league* around He-Adam and where everybody is vexed at it." September 23, 1753. "Since M. le Due d'Or!6ans came to Villers-Cotterets, he has revived tne capta 1 ary ; there are more Wan sixty places for sale on account of these princely annoyances." CHAP. ill. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 59 or does on my road my guides immediately shouted, There goes the nobility ! alluding to the ravages committed by these animals on their grounds." Accordingly, in the eyes of their subjects, they are wild animals. This shows to what privileges lead when divorced from ser vices. It is thus that an obligation to protect degenerates into a right of devastation ; thus do humane and rational beings act, unconsciously, like irrational and inhuman beings. Divorced from the people they misuse them; nominal chiefs, they have un- learned the function of an effective chief; having lost all public character they abate nothing of their private advantages. So much the worse for the canton, and so much the worse for themselves ! The thirty or forty poachers whom they prosecute to-day on their estates will march to-morrow to attack their chateaux at the head of an insurrection. The absence of the masters, the apathy of the provinces, the bad state of cultivation, the exactions of agents, the corruption of the tribunals, the vex- ations of the captainries, indolence, the indebtedness and exi- gencies of the seignior, desertion, misery, the brutality and hos- tility of vassals, all proceeds from the same cause and terminates in the same effect. When sovereignty becomes transformed into a sinecure it becomes burdensome without being useful, and on becoming burdensome without being useful it is overthrown CHAPTER IV. PUBLIC SERVICES DITE BY THE PRIVILEGED CLASSES. I. An English ex simple. The privileged ciass renders no service in France. The influence and rights which remain to them. They use them only for themselves. II. Assemblies of the clergy. They serve only ecclesiastical interests. The clergy exempted from taxation. Solicitations of its agents. Its zeai against the Protestants. III. Influence of the nobles. Regulations in theit favor. Preferments obtained by them in the Church. Distribution of bish- oprics and abbeys. Preferments obtained by them from the State. Gov- ernments, offices, sinecures, pensions, gratuities. Instead of being useful they are an expense. IV. Isolation of the chiefs. Sentiments of subordi- nates. Provincial nobility. The Curates. V. The King. The most priv- ileged of all. Having monopolized all powers, he takes upon himself their functional activity. The burden of this task. He evades it or is incompe- tent. His conscience at ease. France is his property. How he abuses it. Royalty the centre of abuses. Latent disorganization in France. I. USELESS in the canton they might have been useful at the centre of the State, and, without taking part in the local govern- ment, they might have served in the general government. Thus does a lord, a baronet, a squire act in England, even when not a "justice" of his county or a committee-man in his parish. Elected a member of the lower house, a hereditary member of the upper house, he holds the strings of the public purse and prevents the sovereign from spending too freely. Such is the regime in coun- tries where the feudal seigniors, instead of allowing the sovereign to ally himself with the people against them, allied themselves with the people against the sovereign. To protect their own in- terests better they secured protection for the interests of others, and, after having served as the representatives of their com- peers they became the representatives of the nation. Nothing of this kind takes place in France. The States- General are fallen into desuetude and the king may with truth declare him- self ths sole representative of the country. Like trees rendered CHAP. V. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 61 lifeless under the shadow of a gigantic oak, other public powers perish through his growth ; whatever still remains of these en- cumbers the ground, and forms around him a circle of clamber- ing briers or of decaying trunks. One of them, the Parliament, in offshoot simply of the great oak, sometimes imagined itself in possession of a root of its own ; but its sap was too evidently de- rivative for it to stand by itself and provide the people with an independent shelter. Other bodies, surviving, although stunted, the assembly of the clergy and the provincial assemblies, still protect one order, and four or five provinces ; but this protection extends only to the order itself or to the province, and, if it pro- tects a special interest it is commonly at the expense of the gen- eral interest. II. Let us observe the most vigorous and the best-rooted of these bodies, the assembly of the clergy. It meets every five years, and, during the interval, two agents selected by it, watch over the interests of the order. Convoked by the government, sub- ject to its guidance, retained or dismissed when necessary, al- ways in its hands, used by it for political ends, it nevertheless continues to be a refuge for the clergy, which it represents. But it is an asylum solely for that body and, in the series of transac- tions by which it defends itself against fiscal demands, it eases its own shoulders of the load only to make it heavier on the shoul- ders of others. We have seen how its diplomacy saved clerical immunities, how it bought off the body from the poll-tax and the vingtiernes, how it converted its portion of taxation into a " free gift," how this gift is annually applied to refunding the capital which it has borrowed to obtain this exemption, by which deli- cate art it succeeds, not only in not contributing to the treasury, but in withdrawing from it every year about 1,500,000 livres, all of which is so much the better for the church but so much the worse for the people. Now run through the file of folios in which from one period of five years to another the reports of its agents follow each other, so many clever men thus preparing themselves for the highest positions in the church, the abbe's de Boisgelin, de Perigord, de Barral, de Montesquieu ; at each mo- ment, owing to their solicitations with judges and the council, owing to the authority, which the discontent of the powerful or- 6 62 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK i der felt to be behind them gives to their complaints, some ec- clesiastical matter is decided in an ecclesiastical sense; some feudal right is maintained in favor of a chapter or of a bishop some public demand is thrown out. 1 In 1781, notwithstanding decision of the Parliament of Rennes, the canons of St. Main are sustained in their monopoly of the district oven, to the det- riment of the bakers who prefer to bake at their own domiciles as well as of the inhabitants who would have to pay less for breao made by the bakers In 1773, Gue'nin, a schoolmaster, dis- charged by the bishop of Langres, and supported in vain by the inhabitants, is compelled to hand his place over to a successor appointed by the bishop. In 1770, Rastel, a Protestant, having opened a public school at Saint-Affrique, is prosecuted at the de- mand of the bishop and of clerical agents ; his school is closed and he is imprisoned. When an organized body keeps the purse-strings in its own hands it secures many favors; these are the equivalent for the money it grants. The commanding tone of the king and the submissive air of the clergy effect no funda- mental change ; with both of them it is a bargain, 2 giving and taking on both sides, this or that law against the Protestants going for one or two millions added to the free gift. In this way the revocation of the Edict of Nantes is gradually brought about, article by article, one turn of the rack after another turn, each fresh persecution purchased by a fresh largess, the clergy helping the State on condition that the State becomes an execu- tioner. Throughout the eighteenth century the church sees that this operation continues. 3 In 1717, an assemblage of seventy- four persons having been surprised at Andure the men are sent to the galleys and the women are imprisoned. In 1724, an edict declares that all who are present at any meeting, or who shall have any intercourse, direct or indirect, with preachers, shall be condemned to the confiscation of their property, the women to have their heads shaved and be shut up for life, and the men to be sent to the galleys for life. In 1745 and 1746, in Dauphiny, two 1 "Rapport de 1'agence du clerg," fror. 1775 to 1780, pp. 31-34. Ibid, from 1780 to 1785. p. 237- 1 Lanfrey, "L'Eglise et les philosophes," passim. * Boitea\H "Etat de la France en 1789," pp. 205, 207. D'Argenson, "Me'moires," May 5, 1752, pp. 3, 22; September 25, 1753; October 17, '753, and October 26, 1775. Prud- 'homme, "Resume gnral des cahiers des Etats-G6neraux," 1789, (Memorials of th Clergy). ' Histoire des 6glises du de'sert, ' par Charles Coquerel, I. 151 and those following CHAP. iv. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 63 hundred and seventy-seven Protestants are condemned to the galleys, and numbers of women are whipped. Between 1744 and 1752, in the east and in the south, six hundred Protestants are imprisoned and eight hundred condemned to various penal- ties. In 1774, the two children of Roux, a Calvinist of Nimes, are carried off. Up to nearly the beginning of the Revolution, in Languedoc, ministers are hung, while dragoons are despatched against congregations assembled to worship God in deserted places; the mother of M. Guizot here received shots in the skirts of her dress ; this is owing to the fact that, in Languedoc, through the provincial States-Assembly " the bishops control tem- poral affairs more than elsewhere, their disposition being always to dragoon and make converts at the point of the bayonet." In 1775, at the coronation of the king, archbishop Lonemie of Brienne, a well-known unbeliever, addresses the young king: " You will disapprove of the culpable systems of toleration. . . . Complete the work undertaken by Louis the Great. To you is reserved the privilege of giving the final blow to Calvinism in your kingdom." In 1780, the assembly of the clergy declares " that the altar and the throne would equally be in danger if heresy were allowed to throw off its shackles." Even in 1789, the clergy in its memorials, while consenting to the toleration of non-Catholics, finds the edict of 1788 too liberal; it desires that they should be excluded from judicial offices, that they should never be allowed to worship in public, and that mixed marriages should be interdicted ; and much more than this ; they demand preliminary censure of all works issued by the book- sellers, an ecclesiastical committee to act as informers, and igno- minious punishment to be awarded to the authors of irreligious books ; and lastly they claim for their body the direction of pub- lic schools and the oversight of private schools. There is noth- ing strange in this intolerance and in this egoism. A collective body, as with an individual, thinks of itself first of all and above all. If, now and then, it sacrifices some one of its privileges it is for the purpose of securing the alliance of some other b^dy. In that case, which is that of England, all these privileges, which compound with each other and afford each other mutual support, form, through their combination, the public liberties. In this case, only one body being represented, its deputies are neither directed nor tempted to make concession to others; the interest 64 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK I of the body is their sole guide; they subordinate the common in terest to it and serve it at any cost, even to criminal attacks on the public welfare. III. Thus do public bodies work when, instead of being associated together, they are separate. The same spectacle is apparent on contemplating castes and coteries; their isolation is the cause of their egoism. From the top to the bottom of the scale the legal and moral powers which should represent the nation repre- sent themselves only, while each one is busy in its own behalf at the expense of the nation. The nobility, in default of the right to meet together and to vote, exercises its influence, and, to know how it uses this, it is sufficient to read over the edicts and the Almanach. A regulation imposed on Marshal de S6gur l has just restored the old barrier which excluded plebeians from mil- itary rank, and thenceforward, to be a captain, it is necessary to prove four degrees of nobility. In like manner, in late days, one must be a noble to be a master of requests, and it is secretly determined that in future " all ecclesiastical property, from the humblest priory to the richest abbeys, shall be reserved to the nobility." In fact, all the high places, ecclesiastic or laic, are theirs; all the sinecures, ecclesiastic or laic, are theirs, or for their relations, adherents, protege's, and servitors. France is like a vast stable in which the blood-horses obtain double and triple rations for doing nothing, or for only half-work, whilst the draft-horses perform full service on half a ration and that often not supplied. Again, it must be noted, that among these blood-horses is a privileged set which, born near the man- ger, keeps its fellows away and feeds bountifully, fat, shining, with their skins polished, and up to their bellies in litter, and with no other occupation than that of appropriating everything to themselves. These are the court nobles, who live within reach of favors, brought up from infancy to ask for them, to ob- tain and to ask again, solely attentive to royal condescension and frowns, for whom the (Ell de bceuf 2 forms the universe, "in- 1 De Sgur, "M6moires," vol. I. pp. -6 41. De Bouilte, "M6moires," p. 54. Mnae. Campan, " M6moires," v. I. p. 237, proofs i.i detail. * An antechamber in the palace of Versailles in which there was a round or bull's-ey window, where courtiers assembled to await the opening of the tiuor into .he king's apar*- ajenL TR. CHAP. iv. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 65 different to the affairs of the State as to their own affairs, allow- ing one to be governed by provincial intendants as they allowed the other to be governed by their own intendants." Let us contemplate them at work on the budget. We know how large that of the church is ; I estimate that they absorb at least one-half of it. Nineteen chapters of male nobles, twenty- five chapters of female nobles, two hundred and sixty command- cries of Malta belong to them by institution. They occupy, by favor, all the archbishoprics, and, except five, all the bishoprics. 1 They furnish three out of four abbes-commendatory and vicars- general. If, among the abbeys of females royally nominated, we set apart those bringing in twenty thousand livres and more, we find that they all have ladies of rank for abbesses. One fact alone shows the extent of these favors : I have counted eighty- three abbeys of men possessed by the almoners, chaplains, pre- ceptors or readers to the king, queen, princes, and princesses; one of them, the abbe* de Vermont, has 80,000 livres income in benefices. In short, large or small, the fifteen hundred ecclesi- astical sinecures under royal appointment constitute a currency for the service of the great, whether they pour it out in golden rain to recompense the assiduity of their intimates and followers, or keep it in large reservoirs to maintain the dignity of their rank. Besides, according to the fashion of giving more to those who have already enough, the richest prelates possess, above their episcopal revenues, the wealthiest abbeys. According to the Almanach. M. d'Argentre", bishop of Seez, 2 thus enjoys an extra income of 34,000 livres ; M. de Suffren, bishop of Sisteron, 36,000; M. de Girac, bishop of Rennes, 40,000; M. de Bour- deille, bishop of Soissons, 42,000 ; M. d'Agout de Bonneval, bishop of Pamiers, 45,000 ; M. de Marbceuf, bishop of Autun, 50,000; M. de Rohan, bishop of Strasbourg, 60,000; M. de Clce", archbishop of Bordeaux, 63,000; M. de Luynes, arch- bishop of Sens, 82,000; M. de Bernis, archbishop of Alby, 100,000; M. de Brienne, archbishop of Toulouse, 106,000; M. de Dillon, archbishop of Narbonne, 120,000; M. de Laroche- foucauld, archbishop of Rouen, 130,000, that is to say, double and sometimes triple the sums stated, and quadruple, and often six times as much, according to the present standard. M. de 1 "La France eccl&iastique," 1788. * Gianisr de Cassagnac, "Des causes de la ReVolutlor Francalse," III 58. 6* 66 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK i, Rohan derived from his abbeys not 60,000 livres but 400,000, and M. de Brienne, the most opulent of H, next to M. de Ro- han, the 24th of August, 1788, at the time of leaving the min- istry, 1 sent to withdraw from the treasury, " the 20,000 livres of His month's salary which had not yet fallen due, a punctuality he more remarkable that, without taking into account the salary of his place, with the 6,000 livres pension attached to his blue ribbon, he possessed, in benefices, 678,000 livres income and that, still quite recently, a cutting of wood on one of his abbey domains yielded him a million." Let us pass on to the lay budget ; here also are prolific sine- cures, and almost all belong to the nobles. Of this class there are in the provinces the thirty-seven great governments-general, the seven small governments-general, the sixty-six lieutenancies- general, the four hundred and seven special governments, the thirteen governorships of royal palaces, and a number of others, all of them for ostentation and empty honors, all in the hands of the nobles, all lucrative, not only through salaries paid by the treasury, but also through local profits. Here, again, the nobility allowed itself to evade the authority, the activity and the useful- ness of its charge on the condition of retaining its title, pomp and money. 2 The intendant is really the governor; "the titu- lar governor exercising a function with special letters of com- mand," is only there to give dinners ; and again he must have permission to do that, "the permission to go and reside at his place of government." The place, however, yields fruit: the government-general of Berry is worth 35,000 livres income, that of Guyenne 120,000, that of Languedoc 160,000 ; a small special government, like that of Havre, brings in 35,000 livres, besides the accessories ; a medium lieutenancy-general, like that of Rous- J Marmontel, " Me'moires," v. II. book xiii. p. 221. 1 Boiteau, " Etat de la France en 1789, ' pp. 55, 248. D'Argenson, " Considerations sut 1 gouvernement de la France," p. 177. De Luynis, "Journal," XIII. 226, XIV. 287, XIII. 33, 158, i6a, 118, 233, 237, XV. 268, XVI. 304. The government of Ham is wortli 11,250 livres, That of Auxerre 12,000, that of Brianjon 12,000, that of the islands of Ste. Marguerite 16000, that of Schelestadt 15,000, that of Brisach from 15 to 16,000, that of Grarelines 18,000. The ordinance of 1776 had reduced these various places as follows: (Warroquier, II. 467). 18 general governments to 60,000 livres, 21 to 30,000; 114 special governments; 25 to 12,000 livres, 25 to 10,000 and 64 to 8,000; 176 lieutenants and com- mandants of towns, places, etc., of which 35 were reduced to 16,600 and 141 from a,ooo to 6,000. The ordinance of 1788 established, besides these, 17 commands in chief with from 20,000 to 30,000 livres fixed salary and from 4,000 to 6,000 a month for residence, and com- mands of a secondary grade. CHAP. iv. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 67 sillon, 13,000 to 14,000 livres; one special government from 12,000 to 18,000 livres; and observe that, in the Isle of France alone, there are thirty-four, at Vervins, Senlis, Melun, Fcntaine- bleau, Dourdan, Sens, Limours, Etampes, Dreux, Houdan and other towns as insignificant as they are pacific; it is the staff of the Valois dynasty which, since the time of Richelieu, has ceased to perform any service, but which the treasury continues to pay. Consider these sinecures in one province alone, in Languedoc, a country of provincial assemblies where it seems as if the tax payer's purse ought to be better protected. There are three sub-commandants at Tournon, Alais, and Montpelier, " each one paid 16,000 livres, although without any functions since their places were established at the time of the religious wars and troubles, to keep down the Protestants." Twelve royal lieuten ants are equally useless, and only for parade. The same with three lieutenants-general, each one " receiving in his turn, every three years, a gratuity of 30,000 livres, for services rendered in that said province, which are vain and chimerical, and which are not specified ; " because none of them reside there, and if they are paid, it is to secure their support at the court. " Thus the Comte de Caraman, who has more than 600,000 livres income as proprietor of the Languedoc canal, receives 30,000 livres every three years, without legitimate cause, and independently of frequent and ample gifts which the province awards to him for repairs on his canal." The province likewise gives to tht commandant, Comte de Pe'rigord, a gratuity of 12,000 livres in addition to his salary, and to his wife another gratuity of 12,000 livres on her honoring the states for the first time with her pres- ence. It again pays, for the same commandant, forty guards, " of which twenty-four only serve during his short appearance at the Assembly," and who, with their captain, annually cost 15,000 livres. It pays likewise for the Governor from eighty to one hundred guards, " who each receive 300 or 400 livres, besides many exemptions, and who are never on service, since the Governor is a non-resident." The expense of these lazy subalterns is about 24,000 livres, besides 5,000 to 6,000 for their captain, to which must be added 7,500 for gubernatorial secretaries, besides 60,000 livres salaries, and untold profits for the Governor himself. I find everywhere secondary idlers swarming in the shadow of idlers in chief, and deriving their vigor f om the public purs* 68 THE ANt'lENT REGIME. BOOK i which is the common nurse All these people parade and drink and eat copiously, in grand style: it is their principal service, and they attend to it conscientious^. The sessions of the Assembly are junketings of six weeks' duration, in which the intendant expends 25,000 livres in dinners and receptions. 1 Equally lucrative and useless are the court offices 2 so many domestic sinecures, the profits and accessories of which largely exceed the emoluments. I find in the printed register 295 cooks, without counting the table-waiters of the king and his people, while "the head butler obtains 84,000 livres a year in billets and supplies," without counting his salary and the "grand liveries " which he receives in money. The head chambermaids to the queen, inscribed in the Almanach for 150 livres and paid 12,000 francs, make in reality 50,000 francs by the sale of the candles lighted during the day. Augeard, private secretary, and whose place is set down at 900 livres a year, confesses that it is worth to him 200,000. The head huntsman at Fontainebleau sells for his own benefit each year 20,000 francs worth of rabbits. " On each journey to the king's country residences the ladies of the bedchamber gain eighty per cent, on the expenses of moving ; it is said that the coffee and bread for each of these ladies costs 2,000 francs a year, and so on with other things." "Mme. de Tallard made 115,000 livres income out of her place of governess to the children of France, because her salary was increased 35,000 livres for each child." The Due de Penthievre, as grand admiral, received an anchorage due on all vessels " en- tering the ports and rivers of France," which produced annually 91,484 francs. Mme. de Lamballe, superintendent of the queen's household, inscribed for 6,000 francs, gets 150,000.* The Due de Gevres gets 50,000 crowns by one piece of fire- works out of the fragments and scaffolding which belong to him by virtue of his office. 4 Grand officers of the palace, governors 1 Archives nationales, H, 944, April 25, and September 20, 1786. Letters and Memoirs of Furgole, advocate at Toulouse, * Archives nationales, O, 738 (Reports made to the bureau-general of the king's house- hold, March, 1780, by M. Mesnard de Chousy). Augeaixl, W ess-ires," 97. Mme. Campan, "Me'moires," I. 291. D'Argenson, "Memoires," February *o, ..December 9, 1751, "Essai sur les Capitaineries royales et autres" (1789), p. 80. Wirroquier, "Etat de la France en 1789," I. 266. ' "Marie Antoinette," by D'Ameth and Geffroy, II. 377. Mme. Campan, " Me'moires,* I. 296, 298, 300, 301 ; III. 78. Hippeau, " Le Gouveme- ment de Nonnandie," IV. 171 (Letter from Paris, December 13, 1780). D'Argenson, " Memoires," September 5, 1755. Bachaumont, January 19, 1758. "Memoire sur 1'impo- sidon territoriale," by M. de Calonne (1787), p. 54. CHAP. iv. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 69 of royal establishments, captains of captainries, chamberlains, equerries, gentlemen in waiting, gentlemen in ordinary, pages, governors, almoners, chaplains, ladies of honor, ladies of the bed chamber, ladies in waiting on the King, the Queen, on Monsieur, on Madame, on the Comte D'Artois, on the Comtesse D'Artois, on Mesdames, on Madame Royale, on Madame Elisabeth, in each princely establishment and elsewhere hundreds of places pro- vided with salaries and accessories are without any service to per- form, or simply answer a decorative purpose. " Mme. de Laborde has just been appointed keeper of the queen's bed, with 12,000 francs pension out of the king's privy purse ; nothing is known of the duties of this position, as there has been no place of this kind since Anne of Austria." The eldest son of M. de Machault is appointed intendant of the classes. " This is one of the employ- ments called complimentary : it is worth 18,000 livres income to sign one's name twice a year." And likewise with the post of secretary-general of the Swiss guards, worth 30,000 livres a year and assigned to the Abbe Barthelemy; and the same with the post of secretary-general of the dragoons, worth 20,000 livres a year, held in turn by Gentil Bernard and by Laujon, two small pocket poets. It would be simpler to give the money without the place. There is indeed no end to them. On reading various memoirs day after day it seems as if the treasury was open to plunder. The courtiers, unremitting in their attentions to the king, force him to sympathize with their troubles. They are his intimates, the guests of his drawing-room; men of the same stamp as himself, his natural clients, the only ones with whom he can converse, and whom it is necessary to make contented ; he cannot avoid helping them. He must necessarily contribute to the dowries of their children since he has signed their marriage contracts ; he must necessarily enrich them since their profusion serves for the embellishment of his court. Nobility being one of the glories of the throne, the occupant of the throne is obliged to regild it as often as is necessary. 1 In this connection a few Sgures and anecdotes among a thousand speak most eloquently. 8 1 D'Argenson, "M^moires," December 9, 1751. "The expense to courtiers of two new and magnificent coats, each for two fte days, ordered by the king, completely ruins them." 2 DC Luynes, "Journal," XIV. pp. 147-295, XV. 36, 119. D'Argenson, " Me'moirea," April 8, 1752, March 30 and July 28, 1753, July 2, 1735, June 23, 1756. Hippeau, ibid. .V. p. 153 (Letter of May 15, 1730). Necker, "De 1' Administration des Financ ," II. pp. *6j 169, 270, 271, 228. Augeard, "Mlmoires," p. 249. 70 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK I. The Prince de Pons, had a pension of 25,000 livres, out of the king's bounty on which his Majesty was pleased to give 6,000 to Mme. de Marsan, his daughter, Canoness of Remiremont. The family represented to the king the bad state of the Prince de Pons's affairs, and his Majesty was pleased to grant to his son, Prince Camille, 15,000 livres of the pension vacated by the death of his father, and 5,000 livres increase to Mme. de Marsan. M. de Conflans espouses Mile. Portail. " In honor of this marriage the king was pleased to order that out of the pension of 10,000 livres granted to Mme. la Presidente Portail, 6,000 of it should pass to M. de Conflans after the death of Mme. Portail." M. de S6chelles, a retiring minister, had 12,000 livres in an old pension which the king continued ; he has, besides this, 20,000 livres pen- sion as minister ; and the king gives him in addition to all this a pension of 40,000 livres. The motives which prompt these favors are often remarkable. M. de Rouille" has to be consoled for not having participated in the treaty of Vienna ; this explains why " a pension of 6,000 livres is given to his niece, Mme. de Cas- tellane, and another of 10,000 to his daughter, Mme. de Beuvron, who is very rich." "M. de Puisieux enjoys about 76,000 or 77,000 livres income from the bounty of the king; it is true that he has considerable property, but the revenue of this property is uncertain, being for the most part in vines." "A pension of ro,ooo livres has just been awarded to the Marquise de Lede be- cause she is disagreeable to Mme. Infante, and to secure her resignation." The most opulent stretch out their hands and take accordingly. "It is estimated that last week 128,000 livres in pensions were bestowed on ladies of the court, while for the past two years the officers have not received the slightest pension : eight thousand livres to the Duchesse de Chevreuse, whose hus- band has an income of 500,000 livres; 12,000 livres to Mme. de Luynes, that she may not be jealous; 10,000 to the Duchesse de Brancas; 10,000 to the dowager Duchesse de Brancas, mother of the preceding," etc. At the head of these leeches come the princes of the blood. "The king has just given 1,500,000 livres to M. le Prince de Conti to pay his debts, 1,000,000 of which is under the pretext of indemnifying him for the injury done him by the sale of Orange, and 500,000 livres as a gratuity." "The Due d'Orlans formerly had 50,000 crowns pension, as a poor man, and awaiting his father's inheritance. This event making him CHAP. iv. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. Jl rich, with an income of more than 3,000,000 livres, he gave up his pension. But having since represented to the king that his expenditure exceeded his income, the king gave him back his 50,000 crowns." Twenty years later, in 1780, when Louis XVI., desirous of relieving the treasury, signs " the great reformation of the table, 600,000 livres are given to Mesdames for their tables." This is what the dinners, cut down, of three old ladies, cost the public! For the king's two brothers, 8,300,000 livres, besides 2,000,000 income in appanages; for the Dauphin, Madame Royale, Madame Elisabeth, and Mesdames 3,500,000 livres; for the queen, 4,000,000; such is the statement of Necker in 1784. Add to this the casual donations, admitted or concealed; 200,000 francs to M. de Sartines, to aid him in paying his debts; 200,000 to M. Lamoignon, keeper of the seals; 100,000 to M. de Miromesnil for expenses in establishing himself; 166,000 to the widow of M. de Maurepas; 400,000 to the Prince de Salm; 1,200,000 to the Due de Polignac for the pledge on the county of Fenestranges ; 754,337 to Mesdames to pay for Bellevue. 1 "M. de Calonne," says Augeard, a reliable witness, 2 "scarcely en- tered on his duties, raised a loan of 100,000,000 livres, one-quar- ter of which did not find its way into the royal treasury ; the rest was eaten up by people at the court ; his donations to the Comte d'Artois are estimated at 56,000,000 ; the portion of Monsieur is 25,000,000; he gave to the Prince de Cond6, in exchange for 300,000 livres income, 12,000,000 paid down and 600,000 livres annuity, and he causes the most burdensome acquisition to be made for the State, in exchanges of which the damage is more than five to one." We must not forget that in actual rates all these donations, pensions, and salaries are worth double the amount. Such is the use of the great in relation to the central power ; 1 Ntcolardot, " Journal de Louis XVI.," p. 228. Appropriations in the Red Book of 1774 to 1789: 227,985,716 livres, of which 80,000,000 are in acquisitions and gifts to the royal family. Among others there are 14,600,000 to the Comte d'Artois and 14,450,000 to Mon- sieur; 7,726,253 are given to the Queen for Saint-Cloud ; 8,700,000 for the acquisidon of Ile- Adain. * Cf. " Compte g^n^ral des revenus et de'penses fixes au icr Mai, 1789 " (Imprimerie roy- ale, 1789, In 4). Estate of Ile-Dieu, acquired in 1783 of the Due de Mortemart, 1,000,000; estate of Viviers, acquired of the Prince de Soubise in 1784, 1,500,000; estates of St Priest and of St. Etienne, acquired in 1787 of M. Gilbert das Voisius, 1,335,935; the forests of Camors and of Floranges, acquired of the Due de Liancourt in 1785, 1,300,000; fie county f Montgommery, acquired of M. Clement de Basville in 1785, 3,306,604. 72 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BCO instead of constituting themselves representatives of the peopl*, they aimed to be the favorites of the sovereign, and they shear the flock which they ought to preserve. IV. The excoriated flock is to discover finally what is done with its wool. "Sooner or later," says a parliament of 1764^ "the people will learn that the remnants of our finances continue to be wasted in donations which are frequently undeserved ; in ex- cessive and multiplied pensions for the same persons ; in dow- ries and promises of dowry, and in useless offices and salaries." Sooner or later they will thrust back " these greedy hands which are always open and never full; that insatiable crowd which seems to be born only to seize all and possess nothing, and as pitiless as it is shameless." And when this day arrives the ex- tortioners will find that they stand alone. For the characteristic of an aristocracy which cares only for itself is to lapse into a co- terie. Having forgotten the public, it additionally neglects its subordinates ; after being separated from the nation it separates itself from its own adherents. It is a set of staff-officers on fur- lough, indulging in sports without giving themselves further con- cern about inferior officers ; when the hour of battle comes no- body will march under their orders, and chieftains are sought elsewhere. Such is the isolation of the seigniors of the court, and of the prelates among the lower grades of the nobility and the clergy ; they appropriate to themselves too large a share, and give nothing, or almost nothing, to the people who are not of their society. For a century a steady murmur against them is rising, and goes on expanding until it becomes an uproar, in which the old and the new spirit, feudal ideas and philosophic ideas, threaten in unison. " I see," said the bailly of Mirabeau,* "that the nobility is demeaning itself and becoming a wreck. It is extended to all those children of bloodsuckers, the vaga- bonds of finance, introduced by La Pompadour, herself the off- ' " Le President des Brosses," by Foisset (Remonstrances to the king by the Parliament D Dijon, Jan. 19, 1764). 'Lucas de Mondgny, "M6moires de Mirabeau." Letter of the bailly, May 26, 1781. D'Argenson, " Me'moires," IV. 156, 157, 160, 76; VI. p. 320. Marshal Marmont, "MA- moires," I. 9. De Ferrieres, " Memoires," preface. See, on the difficulty in succeeding, the Memoirs of Dumourier. Chateaubriand's father is likewise one of the discontented, " political frnnrtfiir, and very inimical to the court ' (I, 206). Records of the Stales-General f 1789, a general summary by Prud'homme 1 1 frissim. CHAP. IV THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 73 spring of this foulness. One portion of it demeans itself in its servility to the court; the other portion is amalgamated with that quill-driving rabble who are converting the blood of the king's subjects into ink; another perishes stifled beneath vile robes, the ignoble atoms of cabinet-dust which an office drags up out of the mire ; " and all, parvenues of ancient or of the new race, form a band called the court. "The court!" exclaims D : Argenson. "The entire evil is found in this word. The court has become the senate of the nation; the least of the ralets at Versailles is a senator ; chambermaids take part in the government, if not to legislate, at least to impede laws and reg- ulations ; and by dint of hindrance there are no longer either laws, or rules, or law-makers. . . . Under Henry IV. courtiers remained each one at home ; they had not entered into ruinous expenditure to belong to the court ; favors were not thus due to them as at the present day. . . . The court is the sepulchre of the nation." Many noble officers, finding that high grades are only for courtiers, abandon the service, and betake themselves with their discontent to their estates. Others, who have not left their domains, brood there in discomfort, idleness, and ennui, theL ambition embittered by their powerlessness. In 1789, said the Marquis de Ferrieres, most of them " are so weary of the court and of the ministers they are almost democrats." At least, "they want to withdraw the government from the ministerial oligarchy in whose hands it is concentrated ; " there are no grand seigniors for deputies ; they set them aside and "absolutely reject them, saying that they would traffic with the interests of the nobles ; " they themselves, in their memorials, insist that there be no more court nobility. The same sentiments prevail among the lower clergy, and still more actively ; for they are excluded from the high offices, not only as inferiors, but again as plebeian. 1 Already, in 1766, the Marquis de Mirabeau writes : " It would be an insult to most of our pretentious ecclesiastics to offer them a curacy. Revenues and honors are for the abbeVcommendatory, for tonsured bene- ficiaries not in orders, for the numerous chapters." On the contrary, "the true pastors of souls, the collaborators in the 1 "Ephemrides du citoyen," II. 202, 203. Voltaire, " Dictionnaire philosophique," trticle "Cur de Campagne." Abbe GuettSe, "Histoire de 1'Eglise de France," XII. 130 74 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK i holy ministry, scarcely obtain a subsistence." The first class "drawn from the nobility and from the best of the bourgeoisie have pretensions only, without being of the true ministry. The other, only having duties to fulfil without expectations and almost without income . . . can be recruited only from the lowest ranks of civil society," while the parasites who despoil the laborers "affect to subjugate them and to degrade them more and more." "I pity," said Voltaire, "the lot of a countiy curate, obliged to contend for a sheaf of wheat with his un- fortunate parishioner, to plead against him, to exact the tithe of peas and lentils, to waste his miserable existence in constant strife. ... I pity still more the curate with a fixed allowance to whom monks, called gros dedmateursf dare offer a salary of forty ducats, to go about during the year, two or three miles from his home, day and night, in sunshine and in rain, in the snow and in the ice, exercising the most trying and most disagreeable functions." Attempts are made for thirty years to secure them salaries and raise them a little ; in case of their inadequacy the beneficiary, collator or tithe-owner of the parish is required to add to them until the curate obtains 500 livres (1768), then 700 livres (1785), the vicar 200 livres (1768), then 250 (1778), and finally 350 (1785). Strictly, at the prices at which things are, a man may support himself on that. 2 But he must live among the destitute to whom he owes alms, and he cherishes at the bottom of his heart a secret bitterness towards the indolent Dives who, with full pockets, despatches him, with empty pockets, on a mission of charity. At Saint- Pierre de Barjouville, in the Toulousain, the archbishop of Toulouse appropriates to himself one-half of the tithes and gives away eight livres a year in alms; at Bretx, the chapter of Isle Jourdain, which retains one-half of certain tithes and three-quarters of others, gives ten livres ; at Croix Falgarde, the Benedictines, to whom a half of the tithes belong, give ten livres per annum. 3 At Sainte-Croix de Bernay in Normandy, 4 the non-resident abbe", who receives 1 Those entitled to tithes in cereals. TR. * A curate's salary at the present day is, at the minimum, 900 francs with a house and perquisites. 3 Theron de Montaug6, " L' agriculture et les classes rurales dans le pays Toulousain," p. 86. 4 Perin, "la Jc.messe de Robespierre," complaints of the rural parishes of Artois, p. 3*0 Boivin-Champeaux, ibid. pp. 65, 68. Hippeau, ibid. VI. p. 79 et VII. 177. Lettw flf M CHAP. IV. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 75 57,000 livres gives 1,050 livres to the curate without a parson- age and whose parish contains 1,000 communicants. At Saint- Aubin-sur-Gaillon, the abbe", a gros decimateur, gives 350 livres to the vicar who is obliged to go into the village and obtain con- tributions of flour, bread ind apples. At Plessis Hebert, "the substitute deportuaire? not having enough to live on is obliged to get his meals in the houses of neighboring curates." In Artois, where the tithes are often seven and a half and eight per cent, on the product of the soil, a number of curates have a fixed rate and no parsonage ; their church goes to ruin and the beneficiary gives nothing to the poor. "At Saint- Laurent, in Normandy, the curacy is worth not more than 400 livres, which the curate shares with an obitier? and there are 500 inhabitants, three- quarters of whom receive alms." As the repairs on a parsonage or on a church are usually at the expense of a seignior or of a beneficiary often far off, and in debt or indifferent, it sometimes happens that the priest does not know where to lodge nor to say mass. " I arrived," says a curate of the Touraine, " in the month of June, 1788. . . . The parsonage would resemble a hideous cave were it not open to all the winds and the frosts; below there are two rooms with stone floors, without doors or windows, and five feet high ; a third room six feet high, paved with stone, serving as parlor, hall, kitchen, wash-house, bakery and sink for the water of the court and garden; above are three similar rooms, the whole cracking and tumbling in ruins, absolutely threatening to fall, without either doors and windows that hold," and. in 1790, the repairs are not yet made. See by way of con- trast the luxury of the prelates possessing half a million income, the pomp of their palaces, the hunting equipment of M. de Dillon, bishop of Evreux, the confessionals lined with satin of M. de Barral, bishop of Troyes, and the innumerable culinary utensils in massive silver of M. de Rohan, bishop of Strasbourg. Such is the lot of curates at the established rates, and there are "a great many" who do not get the established rates, withheld from them through the ill-will of the higher clergy : who, with Sergent curate of Vallers, January 27, 1790. (Archives nationales, DXIX. portfolio 24.) Letter of M. Briscard, curate of Beaumont-la-Roger, diocese of Evreux, December 19, 1789. {Ibid. DXIX. portfolio 6.) " Tableau moral du clerg de France" (1785), p. 2. 1 He who has the right of receiving the first year's income of a parish church after vacancy caused by death. TR. * One wb.o performs masses for the dead at fixed epochs. TR. 76 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK I their perquisites, get only from 400 to 500 livres, and who vainly ask for the meagre pittance to which they are entitled by the late edict. " Ought not such a request," says a curate, " be willingly granted by Messieurs of the upper clergy who suffer monks to enjoy from five to six thousand livres income each person, whilst they see curates, who are at least as necessary, reduced to the lighter portion as well for themselves as for their parish." And they yet gnaw on this slight pittance to pay the free gift. In this as in the rest, the poor are charged to discharge the rich. In the diocese of Clermont, "the curates, even with the simple fixed rates, are subject to a tax of 60, 80, 100, 120 livres and even more ; the vicars, who live only by the sweat of their brows, are taxed 22 livres." The prelates, on the contrary, pay but little and "it is still a custom to present bishops on New-Year's day with a receipt for their taxes." 1 No issue is open to the curates. Save two or three small bishoprics "with lackeys," all the dignities of the church are reserved to the nobles ; " to be a bishop nowadays," says one of them, " a man must be a gentleman." I regard them as sergeants who, like their fellows in the army, have lost all hope of becoming officers. Hence there are some whose anger bursts its bounds: "We, unfortunate curates at fixed rates; we, commonly assigned to the largest parishes, like my own which, for two leagues in the woods, includes hamlets that would form another; we, whose lot makes even the stones and beams of our miserable dwellings cry aloud," we have to endure prelates " who would still, through their forest-keepers prosecute a poor curate for cutting a stick in their forests, his sole support on his long journeys over the road." On their passing, the poor man " is obliged to jump close against a slope to protect himself from the feet and the spat terings of the horses as likewise from the wheels and, perhaps, the whip of an insolent coachman," and then, "begrimed with dirt, with his stick in one hand and his hat, such as it is, in the other, he must salute, humbly and quickly, through the door of the close, gilded carriage, the counterfeit hierophant who is snor- ing on the wool of the flock the poor curate is feeding, and of which he merely leaves him the dung and the grease." The whole letter is one long cry of rage; it is rancor of this stamp which is to fashion Joseph I ebons and Fouche"s. In this situa 1 Complaints on the additional burdens which the Third- Estate have to support, by Gauti ie Bianzat (1788), p. 237. CHAP. iv. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 77 tion and with these sentiments it is evident that the lower clergy will treat its chiefs as the provincial nobility treated theirs. 1 They will not select " for representatives those who swim in opu- lence and who have always regarded their sufferings with tran- quillity." The curates, on all sides "will confederate together" to send only curates to the States- General, and to exclude "not only canons, abbs, priors and other beneficiaries, but again the principal superiors, the heads of the hierarchy," that is to say, the bishops. In fact, in the States-General out of three hundred clerical deputies we count two hundred and eight curates, and, like the provincial nobles, they bring along with them the distrust and the ill-will which they have so long entertained against their chiefs. We shall soon see a test of it. If the first two orders are constrained to combine against the communes it is at the critical moment when the curates withdraw. If the institution of an upper chamber is rejected it is owing to the commonalty of the gentry (la plebe des gentilshommes ) being unwilling to allow the great families a prerogative which they have abused. V. One privilege remains, the most considerable of all, that of the king ; for, in this staff of hereditary nobles he is the heredi- tary general. His office, indeed, is not a sinecure, like theii rank; but it comports quite as grave disadvantages and worse temptations. Two things are pernicious to man, the lack of occupation and the lack of restraint; neither inactivity nor omnipotency are comportable with his nature, the absolute prince who is all-powerful, like the listless aristocracy with nothing to do, ending in becoming useless and mischievous. In grasping all powers the king insensibly took upon himself all functions, an immense undertaking and one surpassing human strength For it is the Monarchy, and not the Revolution, which endowed France with administrative centralization. 2 Three functionaries, one above the other, manage all public business under the di- rection of the king's council; the comptroller-general at the 1 Hippeau, ibid. VI. 164. (Letter of the curate of Marolles and of thirteen others. Letter of the bishop of Evreu.x, March 20, 1789. Letter of the abh6 d'Osraond, April 2, 1789). Archives rationales, manuscript documents (procte-vertaiix) of the States-General, V. 148. pp. 245-247. Memorials of the curatss of Toulouse, t 150, p. 282, in the representation! of the Dijon chapter. 3 De Tocqueville, book II. Tliis capital truth has been established by M. de Tocquevllh with superior discernment 7* 78 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK i. centre, the intendant in each gtnfralite, the sub-delegate in each flection, manage everything ; they fix, rate, and collect taxes, draft the militia,- lay out and build roads, hire the police, distribute charities, regulate cultivation, impose their tutelage on the parishes, and treat the municipal magistrates as valets. "A village," says Turgot, 2 "is simply an assemblage of houses and huts, and of inhabitants equally passive. ... Your Majesty is obliged to decide wholly by yourself or through your mandataries. . . . Each awaits your special instructions to con- tribute to the public good, to respect the rights of others, and even sometimes to exercise his own." Consequently, adds -: ^Wecker, " the government of France is carried on in the bureaux. . . . The clerks relishing their influence, never fail to persuade the minister that he cannot separate himself from command in a single detail." Bureaucratic at the centre, arbitrariness, ex- ceptions and favors everywhere, such is a summary of the system. " Sub-delegates, officers of elections, receivers and comp trollers of the vingttimes, commissaries and collectors of the : tallies, officers of the salt-tax, process-servers, voituriers-buralistes, overseers of the corv&s, clerks of the excise, of the registry, and of dues reserved, all these men belonging to the tax-service, each according to his disposition, subject to their petty authority, and overwhelm with their fiscal knowledge, the ignorant and inexperienced tax-payers incapable of recognizing when they are cheated." 3 A rude species of centralization, with no control over it, with no publicity, without uniformity, thus installs over the whole country an army of petty pachas who, as judges, decide causes in which they are themselves the contestants, ruling by delegation, and, to sanction their stealings or their insolence, always having on their lips the name of the king who is obliged to let them do as they please. In short, the machine, through 1 A term Indicating a certain division of the kingdom of France to facilitate the collection ?f taxes. Each generalship was subdivided into elections, in which there was a tribunal called the bureau of finances. * Remonstrances of Malesherbes ; Memorials by Turgot and Necker to the king, (La- boulaye, "De 1'administration francaise sous Louis XVI.," Revue des cours litteraires, IV. 1*3, 759. 8l 4-> * Financiers have been known to tell citizens: "The ferine (revenue-agency), ought tc grant you favors, you ought to be forced to come and ask for them. He who pays nevei knows what he owes. The fermier is sovereign legislator in matters relating to his persona' Interest. Every petition, in which the interests of a province, or those of the whole n tion are concerned, is regarded as penal temerity if it is signed by a person in his piivatf capacity and as illicit association if it be signed by several." Malesherbes, ibid. CHAP. IV. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 7 its complexity, irregularity, and dimensions escapes from his grasp. A Frederick II., who rises at four o'clock in the morning, a Napoleon who dictates half the night in his bath, and who works eighteen hours a day, would scarcely suffice for its needs. Such a regime cannot operate without constant strain, without indefatigable energy, without infallible discernment, without mil- itary rigidity, without superior genius; on these conditions alone can one convert twenty-five millions of men into automatons and substitute his own will, lucid throughout, coherent throughout and everywhere present for the wills of those he abolishes. Louis XV. lets "the good machine" work by itself, while he settles down into apathy. "They would have it so, they thought it all for the best," 1 is his manner of speaking when ministerial measures prove unsuccessful. "If I were a lieutenant of the police," he would say again, " I would prohibit cabs." In vain is he aware of the machine being dislocated for he can do nothing and he causes nothing to be done. In the event of misfortune he has a private reserve, his purse apart. "The king," said Mme. de Pompadour, " would sign away a million without think- ing of it, but he would scarcely bestow a hundred louis out of his own little treasury." Louis XVI. strives for some time to remove some of the wheels, to introduce better ones and to reduce the friction of the rest ; but the pieces are too rusty, and too weighty; he cannot adjust them, or harmonize them and keep them in their places ; his hand falls by his side wearied and powerless. He is content to practise economy himself; he re- cords in his journal the mending of his watch, and allows the public vehicle in the hands of Calonne to be loaded with fresh abuses that it may revert back to the old rut from which it is to issue only by breaking down. Undoubtedly the wrong they do, or which is done in their name, dissatisfies and chagrins them, but, at bottom, their conscience is not disturbed. They may feel compassion for the people but they do not feel themselves culpable ; they are its sovereigns and not its mandators. France, to them, is as a domain to its seign- ior, while a seignior is not derelict to honor in being prodigal and neglectful. He merely dissipates away his own property and no- body has a right to call him to account. Founded on feudal 1 Mme. Campan, "Mgmoires," v. I. p. 13. Mme. du Hausset, "M6moires," p. 114. So THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK I. seigniory royalty is like an estate, an inheritance, and it would be infidelity, almost treachery in a prince, in any event weak and base, to allow any portion of the trust received by him intact from his ancestors for transmission to his children, to pass into the hands of his subjects. Not only according to mediaeval traditions is he proprietor-commandant of the French and of France, but again, according to the theory of the legists, he is, like Caesar, the sole and perpetual representative of the nation, and, according to the theological doctrine, like David, the sacred and special dele- gate of God himself. It would be astonishing, if, with all these titles, he did not consider the public revenue as his personal reve- nue, and if, in many cases, he did not act accordingly. Our point of view, in this matter, is so essentially opposed to his, we can scarcely put ourselves in his place; but at that time his point of view was everybody's point of view. It seemed, then, as strange to meddle with the king's business as to meddle with that of a private person. Only at the end of the year I788 1 the fa- mous salon of the Palais-Royal " with boldness and unimaginable folly, asserts that in a true monarchy the revenues of the State should not be at the sovereign's disposition ; that he should be granted merely a sum sufficient to defray the expenses of his establishment, of his donations, and for favors to his servants as well as for his pleasures, while the surplus should be deposited in the royal treasury to be devoted only to purposes sanctioned by the National Assembly." To reduce the sovereign to a civil list, to seize nine-tenths of his income, to forbid him cash acquittances, what an outrage! The surprise would be no greater if at the present day it were proposed to divide the income of each mill- ionaire into two portions, the smallest to go for the owner's sup- port, and the largest to be placed in the hands of the government to be expended in works of public utility. An old farmer-gene- ral, an intellectual and unprejudiced man, gravely attempts to justify the purchase of Saint-Cloud by calling it " a ring for the queen's finger." The ring cost, indeed, 7,700,000 francs, but " the king of France then had an income of 477,000,000. Wha* could be said of any private individual who, with 477,000 Hvres income, should for once in his life, give his wife diamonds worth 1 "Gustave III. et la cour de France," by Gffroy, II. 474. ("Archives de Dresde- French correspondence, November 20, 1788.) CHAP. iv. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 81 7,000 or 8,000 livres ? " * People would say that the gift is mod- erate and that the husband is reasonable. To properly understand the history of our kings, let the funda- mental principle be always recognized that France is their territory, a farm transmitted from father to son, at first small, then slowly enlarged, and, at last, prodigiously enlarged, because the proprie- tor, always on the watch, has found means to make favorable ad- ditions to it at the expense of his neighbors ; at the end of eight hundred years it comprises about 27,000 square leagues of ter- ritory. His interests and his self-love certainly harmonize at cerr tain points with the public welfare ; in the aggregate, he is not a poor administrator, and, since he has always aggrandized himself, he has done better than many others. Moreover, around him, a number of expert individuals, old family councillors, withdrawn from business and devoted to the domain, with good heads and gray beards, respectfully remonstrate with him when he spends too freely; they often interest him in public improvements, in roads, canals, hotels for invalids, military schools, scien- tific institutions and charity workshops, in the limitation- of main- morts, in the toleration of heretics, in the postponement of mo- nastic vows to the age of twenty-one, in provincial assemblies, and in other reforms by which a feudal domain becomes transformed into a modern domain. Nevertheless, the domain, feudal or modern, remains his property which he can abuse as well as use ; now, whoever uses with full sway ends by abusing with full license. If, in his ordinary conduct, personal motives do not pre- vail over public motives, he might be a saint like Louis IX., a stoic like Marcus Aurelius, while remaining a seignior, a man of the world like the people of his court, yet more badly brought up, worse surrounded, more solicited, more tempted and more blindfolded. At the very least he has, like them, his own self-love, his own tastes, his own kindred, his mistress, his wife, his friends, all intimate and influential solicitors who must first be satisfied, while the nation only comes after them. The result is, that, for a hun- dred years, from 1672 to 1774, whenever he makes war it is through pique, through vanity, through family interest, through calculation of private advantages, or to gratify a woman. Louis XV. maintains his wars yet worse than in undertaking them ; J 1 Augeard, " M6moires," p. 133. 1 " Mme. de Pompadour, writing to Marshal d'Estrfes, in the army, about the campaign 82 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK l while Louis XVI., during the whole of his foreign policy, finds a trammel in the conjugal netting. Internally, he lives like other seigniors, but more grandly, because he is the greatest seignior in France ; I shall describe his course presently, and farther on we shall see by what exactions this pomp is supported. In the mean- time, let us note two or three details. According to authentic statements, Louis XV. expended on Mme. de Pompadour thirty- six millions of francs, which is at least seventy-two millions now- adays. 1 According to d'Argenson, 2 in 1751, he has four thou- sand horses in his stable, and we are assured that his household alone, or his personality " cost this year 68,000,000," almost a quar- ter of the public revenue. Why be astonished if we look upon the sovereign in the manner of the day, that is to say, as a cas- tellan in the enjoyment of his hereditary property ? He con- structs, he entertains, he gives festivals, he hunts, he spends money according to his station. Moreover, being the master of his own funds, he gives to whomsoever he pleases, and all his selections are favors. "Your Majesty knows better than myself," writes the abb6 de Vermond to the empress Maria Theresa, 3 "that, according to immemorial custom, three-fourths of the places, honors and pensions are awarded not on account of ser- vices but out of favor and through influence. This favor was originally prompted by birth, alliance, and fortune ; it rarely has any other basis than patronage and intrigue. This course of things, so well established, is respected as a sort of justice even by those who suffer the most from it ; a man of worth not able to dazzle by his court alliances, nor through a bewildering expendi- ture, would not dare to demand a regiment, however ancient and illustrious his services, or his birth. Twenty years ago, the sons of dukes and of ministers, of people attached to the court, the relations and protege's of mistresses, became colonels at the age of sixteen ; M. de Choiseul excited loud complaints on ex- operations, and tracing foi him a sort of plan, had marked on the paper with tntmc/tes (face- patches), the different places which she advised him to attack or defend." Mme. de Genlis, "Souvenirs de F^licie," p. 329. Narrative by Mme. de Puisieux, the mother-in-law of Marshal d'Estrees. 1 According to the manuscript register of Mme. de Pompadour's expenses, in the archives of the prefecture of Versailles, she had expended 36,327,268 livres. Granier de Cassagnac, I. 9 i. 'DArgenson, "M^moires," VI. 398 (April 24, 1751). "M. du Barry declared openly *hat he had consumed 18,000,000 belonging to the State." (Correspondence by Metra, I. 27. * " Marie Antoinette," by d' Vrneth and Geflroy, vol. II. p. 168 (June 5. '774). CHAP. iv. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY. 83 tending this age to twenty-three years; but to compensate favoritism and absolutism he assigned to the pure grace oi the king, or rather to that of his ministers, the appointment of the lieutenant-colonelcies and to the majorities which, until that time, belonged of right to priority of services in the govern- ment, also the commands of provinces and of towns. You are aware that these places have been largely multiplied, and that they are bestowed through favor and credit, like the regi ments. The cordon bleu and the cordon rouge are in the like po- sition, and even sometimes the cross of St. Louis. Bishoprics and abbeys are still more constantly subject to the regime of in- fluence. As to positions in the finances, I dare not allude to them. Appointments in the judiciary are the most conditioned by services rendered ; and yet how much do not credit and rec- ommendation influence the nomination of intendants, first presi- dents" and others? Necker, entering on his duties, finds twenty-eight millions in pensions paid from the royal treasury, and, at his fall, there is an outflow of money scattered by mil- lions on the people of the court. Even during his term of office tne king allows himself to make the fortunes of his wife's friends of both sexes ; the Countess de Polignac obtains 400,000 francs to pay her debts, 800,000 francs dowry for her daughter, and, besides, for herself, the promise of an estate of 35,000 livres in- come, and, for her lover, the Count de Vaudreil, a pension of 30,000 livres; the Princess de Lamballe obtains 100,000 crowns per annum, as much for the post of superintendent of the queen's household, which is revived in her behalf, as for a po- sition for her brother. 1 But it is under Calonne that prodigality reaches insanity. The king is reproached for his parsimony; why should he be sparing of his purse ? Started on a course not his own, he gives, buys, builds, and exchanges; he as- sists those belonging to his own society, doing everything in a style becoming to a grand seignior, that is to say, throwing money away by handfuls. One instance enables us to judge of this: in order to assist the bankrupts Gu6me'ne'e, he purchases of them three estates for about 12,500,000 livres, which they had just purchased for 4,000,000; moreover, in exchange for two domains in Brittany, which produce 33,758 livres income, he 1 "Marie Antoinette," ibid. vol. II. p. 377; voL III. p. 391. 84 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK i. makes over to them the principality of Dombes which produces nearly 70,000 livres income. 1 When we come to read the Red Book further on we shall find 700,000 livres of pensions for the Polignac family, most of them reversionary from one member to another, and nearly 2,000,000 of annual benefactions to the Noailles family. The king has forgotten that his favors are mortal blows, " the courtier who obtains 6,000 livres pension, re ceiving the faille of six villages." z Each largess of the monarchy considering the state of the taxes, is based 'on the privation of the peasants, the sovereign through his clerks, taking bread from the poor to give coaches to the rich. The centre of the govern- ment, in short, is the centre of the evil ; all the wrongs and all the miseries start from it as from a centre of pain and in- flammation ; here it is that the public abscess comes to a head, and here will it break. VI. Such is the just and fatal effect of privileges turned to selfish purposes instead of being exercised for the advantage of others. To him who utters the word, sire or seignior means " the protec- tor who feeds, the ancient who leads ; " 3 with this title and for this purpose too much cannot be granted to him, for there is no more difficult nor more exalted function. But he must fulfil its duties ; otherwise in the day of peril he will be left to himself. Already, and long before the day arrives, his flock is no longer his own ; if it marches onward it is through routine ; it is simply a multitude of persons, but no longer an organized body. Whilst in Germany and in England the feudal regime, retained or trans- formed, still composes a living society, in France its mechanical framework encloses only so many human particles. We still find the material order, but we no longer find the moral order of things. A lingering, deep-seated revolution has destroyed the close hierarchical union of recognized supremacies and of volun- tary deferences. It is like an army in which the sentiments that form its chiefs and those that form its subordinates have disap- peared ; grades are indicated by uniforms, but they have no hold 1 Archives Rationales, H, 1456, Memoir for M. Bouret de Vezelay, syndic for the creditors ' Marquis de Mirabeau, " Trait^ de la population," p. 81. 1 Lord, in Old Saxon, signifies "he who provides food ; " seignior, In the Latin of thf middle ages, signifies "the ancient," the head or chief of che flock. CHAP. iv. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY 85 on consciences; all that constitutes a well-founded army, the legitimate ascendency of officers, the justified trust of soldiers, the daily interchange of mutual obligations, the conviction of each being useful to all and that the chiefs are the most useful of all, is wanting to it. How could we encounter this conviction in an army whose staff-officers have no other occupation but to dine out, to display their epaulettes and to receive double pay ? Long before the final crash France is in a state of dissolution, and she is in a state of dissolution because the privileged classes had for- gotten their characters as public men. 8 BOOK SECOND. Jftattts anti Jiat these escorts were necessary to male* or repel sudden attacks. Mercier, "Tableau de Paris," IX. 3. * Leroi, "Histoire de Versailles," II. ai. (70,000 fixed population and 10,000 floating pop. ilation according to the registers of the mayoralty.) 88 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK n. The rest, however, consists of sumptuous hotels and edifices, sculptured facades, cornices and balustrades, monumental stair- ways, seigniorial architecture, regularly spaced and disposed, as in a procession, around the vast and grandiose palace where all this terminates. Here are the fixed abodes of the noblest families ; to the right of the palace are the hdtels de Bourbon, d'Ecquervilly, de la Tr6moille, de Cond, de Maurepas, de Bouillon, d'Eu, de Noailles, de Penthievre, de Livry, du Comte de la Marche, de Broglie, du Prince de Tingry, d'Orle'ans, de Chatillon, de Villerry, d'Harcourt, de Monaco; on the left are the pavilions d'Orle'ans, d'Harcou^t, the h6tels de Chevreuse, de Babelle, de 1'Hopital, d'Antin, ie Dangeau, de Pontchartrain no end to their enume- ration. Add to these those of Paris, all those which, ten leagues around, at Sceaux, at Ge"nevilliers, at Brunoy, at He-Adam, at Rancy, at Saint-Ouen, at Colombes, at Saint-Germain, at Marly, at Bellevue, in countless places, form a crown of architectural flowers, from which daily issue as many gilded wasps to shine and buzz about Versailles, the centre of all lustre and affluence. About a hundred of these are " presented " each year, men and women, which makes about two or three thousand in all ; l this forms the king's society, the ladies who courtesy before him, and the seigniors who accompany him in his carriage ; their hotels are near by, or within reach, so as to fill his drawing-room or his antechamber at all hours. A drawing-room like this calls for proportionate dependencies ; the hotels and buildings at Versailles devoted to the private service of the king and his attendants number by hundreds. No human existence since that of the Csesars has so spread itself out in the sunshine. In the Rue des Reservoirs we have the old hotel and the new one of the governor of Versailles, the hotel of the tutor to the children of the Comte d'Artois, the ward- robe of the crown, the building for the dressing-rooms and green-rooms of the actors who perform at the palace, with the stables belonging to Monsieur. In the Rue des Bon-Enfants are the hotel of the keeper of the wardrobe, the lodgings for the fountain-men, the hotel of the officers of the Comtesse de Pro- vence. In the Rue de la Pompe, the hotel of the grand-provost, the Duke of Orleans's stables, the hotel of the Comte d'Artois's l Warroquier, "Etat de la France" (1789). The list of persons presented at court hot tween 1779 and 1789, contains 463 men and 414 women. VoL II. p. 5x5. CHAP. i. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 89 guardsmen, the queen's stables, the pavilion des Sources. In the Rue Satory the Comtesse d'Artois's stables. Monsieur's English garden, the king's ice-houses, the riding-hall of the king's light- horseguards, the garden belonging to the hotel of the treasurers of the buildings. Judge of other streets by these four. One cannot take a hundred steps without encountering some accessory of the palace, the hotel of the staff of the body-guard, the hotel of the staff of light-horseguards, the immense hotel of the body- guard itself, the hotel of the gendarmes of the guard, the hotel of the grand wolf-huntsman, of the grand falconer, of the grand huntsman, of the grand-master, of the commandant of the canal, of the comptroller-general, of the superintendent of the buildings, and of the chancellor; buildings devoted to falconry, and the vol de cabinet, to boar-hunting, to the grand kennel, to the duphin kennel, to the kennel for untrained dogs, to the court carriages, to shops and storehouses connected with amusements, to the great stable and the little stables, to other stables in the Rue de Limoges, in the Rue Royale, and in the Avenue Saint- Cloud ; to the king's vegetable garden comprising twenty-nine gardens and four terraces ; to the great habitation occupied by two thousand persons, with other tenements called "Louises" in which the king assigned temporary or permanent lodgings, words on paper render no physical impression of the physi- cal enormity. At the present day nothing remains of this old Versailles, mutilated and appropriated to other uses, but fragments, which nevertheless, go and see. Observe those three avenues meeting at the great square, two hundred and forty feet broad and twenty- four hundred long, and not too large for the gathering crowds, the display, the blinding velocity of the escorts in full speed and of the carriages running " at death's door ; " * observe the two stables facing the chateau with their railings one hundred and ninety-two feet long, costing in 1682, three millions, that is to say, fifteen millions to-day; so ample and beautiful that, even under Louis XIV. himself, they sometimes served as a cavalcade circus for the princes, sometimes as a -theatre, and sometimes as a ball-room ; then let the eye follow the development of the gigantic semi-circular square which, from railing to railing ana 1 People were run over almost every day in Paris by the fashionable vehicles, it being thi habit of the great to ride very fast 8* 90 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK it from court to court, ascends and slowly decreases, at first be- tween the hotels of the ministers and then between the two colossal wings, terminating in the ostentatious frame of the mar- ble court where pilasters, statues, pediments, and multiplied and accumulated ornaments, story above story, carry the majestic reg- ularity of their lines and the overcharged mass of their decora- tion up to the sky. According to a bound manuscript bearing the arms of Mansart, the palace cost 153,000,000, that is to say, about 750,000,000 francs of to-day: 1 when a king aims at im- posing display this is the cost of his lodging. Now turn the eye to the other side, towards the gardens, and this self-display be- comes the more impressive. The parterres and the park are, again, a drawing-room in the open air ; there is nothing natural of nature here; she is put in order and rectified wholly with a view to society; this is no place to be alone and to relax oneself, but a place for promenades and the exchange of polite salutations. Those formal groves are walls and hangings ; those shaven yews are vases and lyres. The parterres are flowering carpets. In those straight, rectilinear avenues the king with his cane in his hand, groups around him his entire retinue. Sixty ladies in brocade dresses, expanding into skirts measuring twenty- four feet in circumference, easily find room on the steps of the staircases. 2 Those verdant cabinets afford shade for a princely collation. Under that circular portico, ah 1 the seigniors enjoying the privilege of entering it witness together the play of a new jet d'eau. Their counterparts greet them even in the marble and bronze figures which people the paths and basins, in the dignified face of an Apollo, in the theatrical air of a Jupiter, in the worldly ease or studied nonchalance of a Diana or a Venus. The stamp of the court, deepened through the joint efforts of society for a century, is so strong that it is graven on each detail as on the whole, and on material objects as on matters of the intellect. 1 153,282,827 livres, 10 sous., 3 deniers. "Souvenirsd'unpagedelacourde Louis XVI.," by the Count d'H6zecques, p. 142. In 1690, before the chapel and theatre were constructed, it had already cost 100,000,000, (St. Simon, XII. 514. Memoirs of Marinier, clerk of tho king's buildings. ) 1 Museum of Engravings, National Library. " Histoire de France par estampes,"/ojj/t nd particularly the plans and views of Versailles, by AveBne, also, "the drawing of a col don given by M. le Prince in the Labyrinth of Chantilly Aug. 39, 1687. CHAP. I. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. gi II. The foregoing is but the framework; before 1789 it was com- pletely filled up. " You have seen nothing," says Chateaubriand, " if you have not seen the pomp of Versailles, even after the dis banding of the king's household; Louis XIV. was always there." * It is a swarm of liveries, uniforms, costumes and equipages as brilliant and as varied as in a picture. I should be glad to have lived eight days in this society. It was made expressly to be painted, being specially designed for the pleasure of the eye, like an operatic scene. But how can we of to-day imagine peo- ple for whom life was wholly operatic ? At that time a grandee was obliged to live in great state ; his retinue and his trappings formed a part of his personality ; he fails in doing himself justice if these are not as ample and as splendid as he can make them ; he would be as much mortified at any blank in his household as we with a hole in our coats. Should he make any curtailment he would decline in reputation ; on Louis XVI. undertaking re- forms the court says that he acts like a bourgeois. When a prince or princess becomes of age a household is formed for them ; when a prince marries a household is formed for his wife ; and by a household it must be understood that it is a pompous display of fifteen or twenty distinct services, stables, a hunting-train, a chapel, a faculty, the bedchamber and the wardrobe, a chamber of disbursements, a table, pantry, kitchen, and wine-cellars, a fruitery, z.fourrtire, a common kitchen, a cabinet, a council; 2 she would feel that she was not a princess without all this. There are 274 appointments in the household of the Due d'Orle"ans, 210 in that of Mesdames, 68 in that of Madame Elisabeth, 239 in that of the Comtesse d'Artois, 256 in that of the Comtesse de Provence and 496 in that of the Queen. When the formation of a household for Madame Royale, one month old, is necessary, " the queen," writes the Austrian ambassador, " desires to sup- press a baneful indolence, a useless affluence of attendants and every practice tending to give birth to sentiments of pride. In spite of the said retrenchment the household of the young prin- cess is to consist of nearly eighty persons destined to the sole 1 Memoirs, I. 221. He was presented at court February 19, 1787. * For these details cf. Warroquier, vol. I. passim. Archives imperiales, O, 710 bis, the king's household, expenditure of 1771. D'Argenson, February 25, 1752. In 1771 thre millions are expended on the installation of the Count d'Artois. A suite of rooms for Mm* Adelaide cost 800,000 livres. 92 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK II service of her Royal Highness." l The civil household of Mon sieur comprises 420 appointments, his military household, 179, that of the Comte d'Artois 237 and his civil household 456. Three-fourths of them are for display; with their embroideries and laces, their unembarrassed and polite expression, their atten- tive and discreet air, their easy way of saluting, walking and smiling, they appear well in an antechamber placed in lines, or scattered in groups in a gallery ; I should have liked to contem- plate even the stable and kitchen array, the figures filling up the background of the picture. By these stars of inferior magnitude we may judge of the splendor of the royal sun. The king must have guards, infantry, cavalry, body-guards, French guardsmen, Swiss guardsmen, Cent Suisses, light-horse- guards, gendarmes of the guard, gate-guardsmen, in all, 9,050 men, 3 costing annually 7,681,000 livres. Four companies of the French guard, and two of the Swiss guard parade every day in the court of the ministers between the two railings, and when the king issues in his carriage to go to Paris or Fontainebleau the spectacle is magnificent. Four trumpeters in front and four behind, the Swiss guards on one side and the French guards on the other, form a line as far as it can reach. 3 The Cent Suisses march ahead of the horsemen in the costume of the sixteenth century, wearing the halberd, ruff, plumed hat and the ample parti-colored striped doublet; alongside of these are the provost-guard with scarlet facings and gold frogs, and compa- nies of yeomanry bristling with gold and silver. The officers of the various corps, the trumpeters and the musicians, covered with gold and silver lace, are dazzling to look at; the kettledrum suspended at the saddle-bow, overcharged with painted and gilded ornaments, is a curiosity for a glass case; the negro cymbal-player of the French guards resembles the sultan of a fairy-tale. Behind the carriage and alongside of it trot the body-guards, with sword and carbine, wearing red breeches, high black boots, and a blue coat sewn with white embroidery, all of 1 Marie Antoinette, " Correspondance secrete," by d'Arneth and Geffrey, III. 292. Letter of Mercy, January 25, 1779. Warroquier, in 1789, mentions only fifteen places in the house- hold of Madame Royale. This, along with other indications, shows the inadequacy o/ official statements. * The number ascertainable after the reductions of 1775 and 1776, and before those of 1787 Se Warroquier, vol. I. Necker, "Administration des Finances," II. 119. ' "La Maison du Roi en 1786,' colored engravings in the Museum of Engravings. CHAP. I. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 93 them unquestionable gentlemen ; there were twelve hundred of these selected among the nobles and according to size; among them are the guards de la manche, still more intimate, who at church and on ceremonial occasions, in white doublets starred with silver and gold spangles, holding their damascene partisans in their hands, always remain standing and turned towards the king " so as to see his person from all sides. " Thus is his protection ensured. Being a gentleman the king is a cavalier and he must have a suitable stable, 1 1,857 horses, 217 vehicles, 1,458 men whom he clothes, the liveries costing 540,000 francs a year; besides these there were 20 tutors and sub-tutors, almoners, professors, cooks, and valets to govern, educate and serve the pages; and again about thirty physicians, apothecaries, nurses for the sick, intendants, treasurers, workmen, and licensed and paid merchants for the accessories of the service; in all more than 1,500 men. Horses to the amount of 250,000 francs are pur- chased yearly, and there are stock- stables in Limousin and in Normandy to draw on for supplies. 287 horses are exercised daily in the two riding-halls; there are 443 saddle-horses in the small stable, 437 in the large one, and these are not sufficient for the " vivacity of the service." The whole cost 4,600,000 livres in 1775, which sum reaches 6,200,000 livres in 1787.* Still another spectacle should be seen with one's own eyes, the pages, 3 the grooms, the laced pupils, the silver-button pupils, the boys of the little livery in silk, the instrumentalists and the mounted messengers of the stable. The use of the horse is a feudal art; no luxury is more natural to a man of quality. Think of the stables at Chantilly which are palaces. To convey an idea of a well-educated and genteel man he was then called 1 Archives nationales, O 1 , 738. Report by M. Tessier (1780), on the large and small stables. The queen's stables comprise 75 vehicles and 330 horses. These are the veritable figures taken from secret manuscript reports, showing the inadequacy of official statements. The Versailles Almanach of 1775 for instance, states that there were only 335 men in the stables while we see that in reality the number was four or five times as many. "Previous tr a*, the reforms, says a witness, I believe that the number of the king's horses amounted to 3,000." (D'He'zecques. "Souvenirs d'un page de Louis XVI.," p. 121.) 2 " La Maison du Roi justifi6e par un soldat citoyen," (1786) according to statements published by the government. " La future maison du roi" (1790). "The two stables cost in 1786, the larger one 4,207,606 livres, and the smaller 3,509,402 livres, a total of 7,717,058 livres, of which 486,546 livres were for the purchase of horses." * " On my arrival at Versailles (1786), there were 150 pages not including those of the princes of the blood who lived at Paris. A page's coat cost 1,500 livres, (crimson velvel embroiderca with gold on ail the seams, and a hat with feather and Spanish point lace.)" D'Hezecques, ibid. 112. 94 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK u " an accomplished cavalier ; " in fact, his importance was fully manifest only when he was in the saddle, on a blood-horse like himself. Another genteel taste, the effect of the preceding, is the chase. It costs the king from 1,100,000 to 1,200,000 livres a year, and requires 280 horses besides those of the two stables. A more varied or more complete equipment could not be imagined, a pack of hounds for the boar, another for the wolf, anothei for the roe-buck, a cast, (of hawks) for the crow, a cast for the magpie, a cast for merlins, a cast for hares, a cast for the fields. In 1783, 179,194 livres are expended for feeding horses and 53,412 livres for feeding dogs. 1 The entire territory, ten leagues around Paris, is a game-preserve; "not a gun could be fired there; a accordingly the plains are seen covered with partridges accus- tomed to man, quietly picking up the grain and never stirring as he passes." Add to this the princes' captainries extending as far as Villers-Cotterets and Orleans; these form an almost continu- ous circle around Paris, thirty leagues in circumference where game, protected, replaced and multiplied, swarms for the pleasure of the king. The park of Versailles alone forms an enclosure of more than ten leagues. The forest of Rambouillet embraces 25,000 arpents (30,000 acres). Herds of seventy-five and eighty stags are encountered around Fontainebleau. No true hunter could read the minute-book of the chase without feeling an impulse of envy. The wolf-hounds run twice a week and they take forty wolves a year. Between 1743 and 1744 Louis XV. runs down 6,400 stags. Louis XVI. writes August 3oth, 1781: "Killed 460 pieces to-day." In 1780 he brings down 20,534 pieces; in 1781, 20,291; in fourteen years, 189,251 pieces, besides 1,254 stags, while boars and bucks are proportionate; and it must be noted that this is all done by his own hand since his parks approach his houses. Such is, in fine, the character of a " well-appointed household," that is to say, provided with its dependencies and services. Everything is within reach ; it is a complete world in itself and self-sufficing. One exalted being attaches to and gathers around it, with universal foresight and minuteness of detail, every ap- 1 Archives rationales, O 1 , 778. Memoria. oa the hunting-train between 1760 and 1792 and especially the report of 1786. 2 Mercier, "Tableau de Pvis," vol. I. p. n; v. p. 62. D'Hezectjues, ibid, 253. "Jour nal de Louis XVI." published by Nicolard at, Jassim. CHAP. I. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 95 purtenance it employs or can possibly employ. Each prince, each princess thus has a professional faculty and a chapel; 1 it would not answer for the almoner who says mass or the doctci who looks after their health to be obtained outside. So much stronger is the reason that the king should have ministrants of this stamp; his chapel embraces seventy-five almoners, chaplains, confessors, masters of the oratory, clerks, announcers, carpet- bearers, choristers, copyists, and composers of sacred rcusic; his faculty is composed of forty-eight physicians, surgeons, apoth- ecaries, oculists, operators, bone-setters, distillers, chiropodist? and spagyrists (a species of alchemists). We must still note his de- partment of profane music consisting of one hundred and twen- ty-eight vocalists, dancers, instrumentalists, directors and superin- tendents ; his library corps of forty-three keepers, readers,' inter- preters, engravers, medallists, geographers, binders and printers ; the staff of ceremonial display, sixty-two heralds, sword-bearers, ushers and musicians ; the staff of housekeepers consisting of six- ty-eight marshals, guides and commissaries. I omit other services in haste to reach the most important, that of the table, a fine house and good housekeeping being known by the table. There are three sections of the table service; 2 the first for the king and his younger children; the second, called the little ordi- nary, for the table of the grand-master, the grand-chamberlain and the princes and princesses living with the king ; the third, called the great ordinary, for the grand-master's second table, that of the butlers of the king's household, the almoners, the gentlemen in waiting, and that of the valets-de-chambre, in all three hun- dred and eighty-three officers of the table and one hundred and three waiters at an expense of 2,177,771 livres; besides this there are 389,173 livres appropriated to the table of Madame Elisabeth, and 1,093,547 livres for that of Mesdames, the total being 3,660,491 livres for the table. The wine-merchant fur- nished wine to the amount of 300,000 francs per annum, and 1 Warroquier, vol. I. passim. Household of the Queen : for the chapel 22 persons, the faculty 6. That of Monsieur, the chapel 22, the faculty 21. That of Madame, the chapel 20, the faculty 9. That of the Comte d'Artois, the chapel 20, the faculty 28. That of the Comtesse d'Artois, the chapel 19, the faculty 17. That of the Due d'Orteans, the chape. 6, the faculty 19. * Archives nationales, O', 738. Report by M. Mesnard de Choisy, (March, 1780). They cause a reform (August 17, 1780). "La Maison du roi justified" (1789), p. 24. In 1788 th expenses of the table are reduced to 2,870,999 livres, of which 600,000 livres are appropri ated to Mesdames for their table. 96 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK n the purveyor game, meat and fish at a cost of 1,000,000 livres. Only to fetch water from Ville-d'Avray and to convey servants, waiters and provisions required fifty horses hired at the rate of 70,591 francs per annum. The privilege of the royal princes and princesses " to send to the bureau for fish on fast days when not residing regularly at the court" amounts in 1778, to 175,116 livres. On reading in the Almanach the titles of the office- holders we see a Gargantua's feast spread out before us, the formal hierarchy of the kitchens, so many grand officials of the table, the butlers, comptrollers and comptroller-pupils, the clerks and gentlemen of the pantry, the cup-bearers and carvers, the officers and equerries of the kitchen, the chiefs, assistants and head-cooks, the ordinary scullions, turnspits and cellarers, the common gardeners and salad gardeners, laundry servants, pas- try-cooks, plate-changers, table-setters, crockery-keepers, and broach-bearers, the butler of the table of the head-butler, an entire procession of broad-braided backs and imposing round bellies, with grave countenances, which, with order and conviction, exercise their functions before the saucepans and around the buffets. One step more and we enter the sanctuary, the king's apart- ment. Two principal dignitaries preside over this and each has under him about a hundred subordinates. On one side is the grand chamberlain with his first gentlemen of the bedchamber, the pages of the bedchamber, their governors and instructors, the ushers of the antechamber, with the four first valets-de- chambre in ordinary, sixteen special valets serving in turn, his regular and special cloak-bearers, his barbers, upholsterers, watch-menders, waiters and porters; on the other hand is the gi md-master of the wardrobe, with the masters of the wardrobe an d the valets of the wardrobe regular and special, the ordinary trunk-carriers, mall-bearers, tailors, laundry servants, starchers, ind common waiters, with the gentlemen, officers and secretaries in ordinary of the cabinet, in all 198 persons for domestic service, like so many domestic utensils for every personal want or as sumptuous pieces of furniture for the decoration of the apart- ment. Some of them fetch the mall and the balls, others hold the mantle and cane, others comb the king's hair and dry him off after a bath, others drh e the mules which transport his bed, others watch his pet greyhounds in his room, others fold, put on CHAP. i. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 97 *nd tie his cravat, and others fetch and carry off his easy chair. 1 Some there are whose sole business it is to fill a corner which must not be left empty. Certainly, with respect to ease of deportment and appearance these are the most conspicuous of hll; being so close to the master they are under obligation to appear well ; in such proximity their bearing must not create a discord. Such is the king's household, and I have only described one of his residences. He has a dozen of them besides Versailles, great and small, Marly, the two Trianons, la Muette, Meudon, Choisy, Saint-Hubert, Saint-Germain, Fontainebleau, Compiegne, Saint-Cloud, Rambouillet, 2 without counting the Louvre, the Tuileries and Chambord, with their parks and hunting-grounds, their governors, inspectors, comptrollers, concierges, fountain- tenders, gardeners, sweepers, scrubbers, mole-catchers, wood- rangers, mounted and foot-guards, in all more than a thousand persons. Naturally he entertains, plans and builds, and, in this way expends three or four millions per annum. 3 Naturally, also, he repairs and renews his furniture; in 1778, which is an average year, this costs him 1,936,853 livres. Naturally, also, he takes his guests along with him and defrays their expenses, they and their attendants; at Choisy, in 1780, there are sixteen tables with three hundred and forty-five seats besides the dis- tributions; at Saint-Cloud, in 1785, there are twenty-six tables; " an excursion to Marly of twenty-one days is a matter of 1 20, ooo livres extra expense;" the excursion to Fontainebleau has cost as much as 400,000 and 500,000 livres. His removals, on the average, cost half a million and more per annum. 4 To complete our idea of this immense paraphernalia it must be borne in 1 D'Hezecques, ibid. 212. Under Louis XVI. there were two chair-carriers to the king, who came every morning, in velvet coats and with swords by their sides, to inspect and empty the object of their functions; this post was worth to each one 20,000 livres per annum. * In 1787, Louis XVI. either demolishes or orders to be sold, Madrid, la Muette and Choisy, kis acquisitions, however, Saint-Cloud, He-Adam and Rambouillet, greatly surpassing his reforms. 8 Necker, " Compte-rendu," II. 452. Archives nationales, O 1 , 736. "La Maison du roi justified" (1789). Constructions in 1775, 3,924,400, in 1786, 4,000,000, in 1788, 3,077,000 livres. Furniture in 1788, 1,700,000 livres. 4 Here are some of the casual expenses. (Archives nationales, O 1 , 2805). On the birth of the Due de Bourgogne in 1751, 604,477 h'vres. For the Dauphin's marriage in 1770, 1,267,770 livres. For the marriage of the Comte d'Artois in 1773, 2,016,221 livres. For th coronation in 1775, 835,862 livres. For plays, concerts and balls in 1778, 481,744 livres, and m J 779 382,986 livres. 9 98 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK n mind that the artisans and merchants belonging to these vari- ous official bodies are obliged, through the privileges they en- joy, to follow the court "on its journeys that it may be provided on the spot with apothecaries, armorers, gunsmiths, sellers of silker and woollen hosiery, butchers, bakers, embroiderers, publi- cans, cobblers, belt-makers, candle-makers, hatters, pork-dealers, surgeons, shoemakers, curriers, cooks, pinkers, gilders and en- gravers, spur-makers, sweetmeat-dealers, furbishers, old-clothes brokers, glove-perfumers, watchmakers, booksellers, linen-drapers, wholesale and retail wine-dealers, carpenters, coarse-jewelry haberdashers, jewellers, parchment-makers, dealers in trimmings, chicken-roasters, fish-dealers, purveyors of hay, straw and oats, hardware-sellers, saddlers, tailors, gingerbread and starch-dealers, fruiterers, dealers in glass and in violins." 1 One might call it an oriental court which, to be set in motion, moves an entire world: "when it begins to move one has to take the post in advance to go anywhere." The total is near 4,000 persons for the king's civil household, 9,000 to 10,000 for his military household, at least 2,000 for those of his kindred, in all 15,000 individuals, at an expense of forty and fifty millions livres, which would be equal to double the amount to-day and which, at that time, constituted one-tenth of the public revenue. 2 We have here the central figure of the monarchical show. However grand and costly it may be, it is only proportionate to its purpose, since the court is a public institution and the aristocracy, with nothing to do, devotes itself to filling up the king's drawing-room. III. Two causes maintain this affluence, one the feudal form still preserved, and the other the new centralization just introduced, 1 Warroquier, vol. I. ibid. "Marie Antoinette," by d'Arneth and Geffrey. Letter of Mercy, Sept 16, 1773. " The multitude of people of various occupations following th king on his travels resembles the progress of an army." The civil households of the king, queen, and Mme. Elisabeth, of Mesdames, and Mme. Royale, 25,700,000. To the king's brothers and sisters-in-law, 8,040,000. The king's military household, 7,681,000, (Necker, " Compte-rendu," II. 119). From 1774 to 1788 the expenditure on the households of the king and his family varies from 32 to 36 millions, not including the military household, (" La Maison du roi justified "). In 1789 the households of the king, queen, Dauphin, royal children and of Mesdames, cost 25,000,000. Those of Monsieur and Madame, 3,656,000 ; those of the Count and Countess d'Artois, 3,656,000 ; those of the Dukes de Bern and d'Angouleme, 700,000 ; salaries continued to persons for merly in the princes' service, 228,000. The total is 33,240,000. To this must be added the king's military household and two millions in the princes' appanages. (A general account of fixed Incomes and expenditure on the first of May, 1789, rendered by the minister of finances to the committee on finances of the National Assembly.) CHAP. i. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 99 one placing the royal service in the hands of the nobles, and the other converting the nobles into place-hunters. Through the duties of the palace the highest nobility live with the king, residing under his roof; the grand-almoner is M. de Montmorency-Laval, bishop of Metz; the first almoner is M. de Bussu6jouls, bishop of Senlis; the grand-master of France is the Prince de Cond6; the first royal butler is the Comte d'Escars; the second is the Marquis de Montdragon; the master of the pantry is the Duke de Brissac ; the chief cup- bearer is the Marquis de Verneuil ; the chief carver is the Mar- quis de la Chesnaye ; the first gentlemen of the bedchamber are the Dues de Richelieu, de Durfort, de Villequier, and de Fleury ; the grand-master of the wardrobe is the Due de la Roche- foucauld-Liancourt ; the masters of the wardrobe are the Comte de Boisgelin and the Marquis de Chauvelin; the captain of the falconry is the Chevalier du Forget; the captain of the boar- hunt is the Marquis d'Ecquevilly ; the superintendent of edifices is the Comte d'Angevillier ; the grand-equerry is the Prince de Lambesc; the master of the hounds is the Due de Penthievre; the grand-master of ceremonies is the Marquis de Breze ; the grand-master of the household is the Marquis de la Suze; the captains of the guards are the Dues d'Agen, de Vil- lery, de Brissac, d'Aguillon, and de Biron, the Princes de Poix, de Luxembourg and de Soubise ; the provost of the hotel, is the Marquis de Tourzel; the governors of the residences and cap- tains of the chase are the Due de Noailles, Marquis de Champ- cenetz, Baron de Champlost, Due de Coigny, Comte de Modena, Comte de Montmorin, Due de Laval, Comte de Brienne, Due d' Orleans, and the Due de Gevres. 1 All these seigniors are the king's necessary intimates, his permanent guests and generally hereditary, dwelling under his roof, in close and daily intercourse with him since they are "his folks" (gens)* and perform domestic service about his person. Add to these their equals, as noble and nearly as numerous, dwelling with the queen, with Mes- dames, with Mme. Elisabeth, with the Comte and Comtesse de Provence and the Comte and Comtesse d'Artois. And these are only the heads of the service ; if, below them in rank and 1 Warroquier, ibid. (1789) vol. I., passim. * An expression of the Comte d'Artois on introducing the officers of his household to hi* rife. ioo THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK u office, I count the titular nobles I find, among others, 68 al- moners or chaplains, 170 gentlemen of the bedchamber or ir waiting, 117 gentlemen of the stable or of the hunting-train, 148 pages, 114 titled ladies in waiting, besides all the officers, even to the smallest of the military household, without counting 1,400 ordinary guards who, verified by the genealogist, are ad- mitted by virtue of their title to pay their court. 1 Such is the fixed body of recruits for the royal receptions ; the distinctive trait of this regime is the conversion of its servants into guests, the drawing-room being filled from the anteroom. Not that the drawing-room needs to be filled in this manner. Being the source of all preferment and of every favor, it is nat- ural that it should overflow ; in pur levelling society, that of an insignificant deputy, or of a mediocre journalist, or of a fashion- able woman, is full of courtiers under the name of friends and visitors. Moreover, here, to be present is an obligation ; it might be called a continuation of ancient feudal homage ; the staff of nobles is maintained as the retinue of its born general. In the language of the day, it is called " paying one's duty to the king.'* Absence, in the sovereign's eyes, would be a sign of independence as well as of indifference, while submission as well as assiduity is his due. In this respect we must study the institution from the beginning. The eyes of Louis XIV. glance around at every moment, "on arising or retiring, on passing into his apart- ments, in his gardens, . . . nobody escapes, even those who hoped they were not seen ; it was a demerit with some, and the most distinguished, not to make the court their ordinary sojourn, to others to come to it but seldom, and certain disgrace to those who never, or nearly never, came." 2 Henceforth, the main thing, for the first personages in the kingdom, men and women, ecclesiastics and laymen, the grand affair, the first duty in life, the true occupation, is to be at all hours and in every place under t'^e king's eye, within reach of his voice and of his glance. " Who- ever," says La Bruyere, "considers that the king's countenance is the courtier's supreme felicity, that he passes his life looking on 1 The number of light-horsemen and of gendarmes was reduced in 1775 and in 1776; both bodies were suppressed in 1787. 1 Saint-Simon, " Memoires," XVI. 456. This need of being always surrounded continue* up to the last moment; in 1791, the queen exclaimed bitterly, speaking of the nobility, " when any proceeding of ours displeases them they are sulky ; no one comes to my table the king retires alone; we have to suffer for our misfortunes." Mme. Campan, II. 177. CHAP. i. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. IOI it and within sight of it, will comprehend to some extent how to see God, constitutes the glory and happiness of the saints." There were at this time prodigies of voluntary assiduity and sub- jection. The Due de Fronsac, every morning at seven o'clock, in winter and in summer, stationed himself, at his father's com- mand, at the foot of the small stairway leading to the chapel, solely to shake hands with Mme. de Maintenon on her leaving for St. Cyr. l "Pardon me, Madame," writes the Due de Richelieu to her, "the great liberty I take in presuming to send you the letter which I have written to the king, begging him on my knees that he will occasionally allow me to pay my court to him at Ruel, for / would rather die than pass two months without see- ing him" The true courtier follows the prince as a shadow fol- lows its body; such, under Louis XIV., was the Due de la Rochefoucauld, the master of the hounds. " He never missed the king's rising or retiring, both changes of dress every day, the hunts and the promenades, likewise every day, for ten years in succession, never sleeping away from the place where the king rested, and yet on a footing to demand leave, but not to stay away all night, for he had not slept out of Paris once in forty years, but to go and dine away from the court, and not be present on the promenade." If, later, and under less exacting masters, and in the general laxity of the eighteenth century, this discipline is relaxed, the institution nevertheless subsists; 2 in default of obedience, tradition, interest and amour-propre suffice for the people of the court. To approach the king, to be a domestic in his household, an usher, a cloak-bearer, a valet, is a privilege that is purchased, even in 1789, for thirty, forty, and a hun- dred thousand livres; so much greater the reason why it is a privilege to form a part of his society, the most honorable, the most useful, and the most coveted of all. In the first place, it is a proof of race. A man, to follow the king in the chase, and a woman, to be presented to the queen, must previously satisfy the genealogist, and by authentic documents, that his or her nobility goes back to the year 1400. In the next place, it ensures good fortune. This drawing-room is the only place within reach 1 Due de Le'vis, "Souvenirs et Portraits," 29. Mme. de Mainltaon, "Correspondance." 2 M. de V who was promised a king's lieutenancy or command yields it to one of Mme. de Pompadour's protege's, obtaining in lieu of it the part of exempt in "Tartuffe, played by the seigniors before the king in the small cabinet (Mme. de Hausset, 168) " M. de V thanked Madame as if she had made him a duke." 9* 102 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK a. of royal favors; accordingly, up to 1789, the great families nevei stir away from Versailles, and day and night they lay in am- bush. The valet of the Marshal de Noailles says to him one night on closing his curtains, "At what hour will Monseigneui be awakened?" "At ten o'clock, if no one dies during the night." 1 Old courtiers are again found who, "eighty years of age, have passed forty-five on their feet in the antechambers of the king, of the princes, and of the ministers. . . . You have ovJy three things to do," says one of them to a debutant, "speak well of everybody, ask for every vacancy, and sit down when you can." Hence, the king always has a crowd around him. The Comtesse du Barry says, on presenting her niece at court, the first of August, 1773, "the crowd is so great at a presenta- tion, one can scarcely get through the antechambers." 2 In De- cember, 1774, at Fontainebleau, when the queen plays at her own table every evening, "the apartment, though vast, is never empty. . . . The crowd is so great that one can talk only to the two or three persons with whom one is playing." The fourteen apartments, at the receptions of ambassadors are full to over- flowing with seigniors and richly dressed women. On the first of January, 1775, the queen "counted over two hundred ladies presented to her to pay their court." In 1780, at Choisy, a table for thirty persons is spread every day for the king, another with thirty places for the seigniors, another with forty places for the officers of the guard and the eque. ries, and one with fifty for the officers of the bedchamber. According to my estimate, the king, on getting up and on retiring, on his walks, on his hunts at play, has always around him at least forty or fifty seigniors and, generally, a hundred, with as many ladies, besides his at- tendants on duty; at Fontainebleau, in 1756, although "there were neither fetes nor ballets this year, one hundred and six ladies were counted." When the king holds a "grand appartement" when play or dancing takes place in the gallery of mirrors, four or five hundred guests, the elect of the nobles and of the fashion, 1 " Paris, Versailles et les provinces au dix-huitieme siecle," II. 160, 168. Mercier, " Tableau de Paris," IV. 150. De S6gur, " Mmoires," I. 16. *" Marie Antoinette," by D'Arneth and Geffiroy, II. 27, 255, 281. "Gustave III." by Geffroy, November, 1786, bulletin of Mme. de Stael. D'Hzecques, ibid. 231. Archive* nationales, O 1 , 736, a letter by M. Amelot, September 23, 1780. De Luynes, XV. 260, 367; XVI. 248. 163 ladies, of which 4) are in service, appear and courtesy to the king. 160 me* ind more than 100 ladies pay theii respects to the Dauphin and Dauphine. CHAV. i. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 103 range themselves on the benches or gather around the card and cavagnole tables. 1 This is a spectacle to be seen, not by the im- agination, or through imperfect records, but with our own eyes and on the spot, to comprehend the spirit, the effect and the triumph of monarchical culture. In an elegantly furnished house, the dining-room is the principal room, and never was one more dazzling than this. Suspended from the sculptured ceiling peopled with sporting cupids, descend, by garlands of flowers and foliage, blazing chandeliers, whose splendor is enhanced by the tall mirrors ; the light streams down in floods on gildings, diamonds, and beaming, arch physiognomies, on fine busts, and on the capacious, sparkling and garlanded dresses. The skirts of the ladies ranged in a circle, or in tiers on the benches, "form a rich espalier covered with pearls, gold, silver, jewels, spangles, flowers and fruits, with their artificial blossoms, goose- berries, cherries, and strawberries," a gigantic animated bouquet of which the eye can scarcely support the brilliancy. There are no black coats, as nowadays, to disturb the harmony. With the hair powdered and dressed, with buckles and knots, with cravats and ruffles of lace, in silk coats and vests of the hues of fallen leaves, or of a delicate rose tint, or of celestial blue, em- bellished with gold braid and embroidery, the men are as ele- gant as the women. Men and women, each is a selection ; they are all of the accomplished class, gifted with every grace which race, education, fortune, leisure and custom can bestow; they are perfect of their kind. There is not a toilet here, an air of the head, a tone of the voice, an expression in language which is not a masterpiece of worldly culture, the distilled quintessence of all that is exquisitely elaborated by social art. Polished as the society of Paris may be, it does not approach this ; 2 compared with the court, it seems provincial. It is said that a hundred thousand roses are required to make an ounce of the unique perfume used by Persian kings ; such is this drawing-room, the frail vial of crystal and gold containing the substance of a human vegetation. To fill it, a great aristocracy had to be transplanted to a hot-house and become sterile in fruit and ' Cochin. Engravings of a masked ball, of a dress ball, of the king and queen at play, of tfie interior of a theatre (1745). Costumes of Moreau (1777). Mme. de Genlis, "Diction naire des etiquettes," the article fantre. 1 " The difference between the tone and language of the court and the town was about as perceptible as that between Pari and the provinces." (De Tilly, " Memoires," I. 153.) 104 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK n. flowers, and then, in the royal alembic, its pure sap is concen- trated into a few drops of aroma. The price is excessive, but only at this price can the most delicate perfumes be manufact vrred. IV. An operation of this kind absorbs him who undertakes it as well as those who undergo it. A nobility for useful purposes is not transformed with impunity into a nobility for ornament; 1 one becomes himself a part of the show which takes the place of action. The king has a court which he is com- pelled to maintain. So much the worse if it absorbs all his time, his intellect, his soul, the most valuable portion of his active forces and the forces of the State. To be the master of a house is not an easy task, especially when five hundred persons are to be entertained ; one must necessarily pass his life in public and be on exhibition. Strictly speaking it is the life of an actor who is on the stage the entire day. To support this load, and work besides, required the temperament of Louis XIV., the vigor of his body, the extraor- dinary firmness of his nerves, the strength of his digestion, and the regularity of his habits; his successors who come after him grow weary or stagger under the same load. But they cannot throw it off; an incessant, daily performance is inseparable from their position and it is imposed on them like a heavy, gilded, ceremonial coat. The king is expected to keep the entire aris- tocracy busy, consequently to make a display of himself, to pay back with his own person, at all hours, even the most private, even on getting out of bed, and even in his bed. In the morning, at the hour named by himself beforehand, 2 the head 1 The following is an example of the compulsory inactivity of the nobles a dinner of Queen Marie Leezinska at Fontainebleau : " I was introduced into a superb saloon where I found about a dozen courtiers promenading about and a table set for as many persons, which was nevertheless prepared for but one person. . . . The queen sat down while the twelve courtiers took their positions in a semi-circle ten steps from the table ; I stood alongside if them imitating their deferential silence. Her Majesty began to eat very fast, keeping her eyes fixed on the plate. Finding one of the dishes to her taste she returned to it, and then, running her eye around the circle, she said : " Monsieur de Lowenthal ? " On hearing thi* name a fine-looking man advanced, bowing, and he replied, " Madame ? " "I find tiiat this ragout is fricasee chicken." "I believe it is, Madame." On making this answer, in the gravest manner, the marshal, retiring backwards, resumed his position, while the queen finished her dinner, never uttering another word and going back to her room the same way as she came." (Memoirs of Casenova.) 8 " Under Louis XVI , who arose at seven or eight o'clock, th Itver took place at hall- past eleven unless hunting or ceremonies required it earlier." There is the same ceremonia. at eleven, again in the evening on retiring, and also during the day, when he change* hli loots. (D'Hfeecques, pi CHAP. i. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 105 valet awakens him ; five series of persons enter in turn to perform their duty, and, " although very large, there are days when the waiting-rooms can hardly contain the crowd of courtiers." The first one admitted is " V entree familiere, " consisting of the chil- dren of France, the princes and princesses of the blood, and, besides these, the chief physician, the chief surgeon and other serviceable persons. 1 Next, comes the "grande entree" which comprises the grand-chamberlain, the grand-master and mastet of the wardrobe, the first gentlemen of the bedchamber, the Dukes of Orleans and Penthievre, some other highly fivored seigniors, the ladies of honor and in waiting of the queen, Mesdames and other princesses, without enumerating barbers, tailors and various descriptions of valets. Meanwhile spirits of wine are poured on the king's hands from a service of plate, and he is then handed the basin of holy water; he crosses himself and repeats a prayer. Then he gets out of bed before all these people and puts on his slippers. The grand-chamberlain and the first gentleman hand him his dressing-gown; he puts this on and seats himself in the chair in which he is to put on his clothes. At this moment the door opens and a third group enters, which is the "entree des brevets;" the seigniors who compose this enjoy, in addition, the precious privilege of assisting at the "petitt coucher, " while, at the same moment there enters a detachment of attendants, consisting of the physicians and surgeons in ordi- nary, the intendants of the amusements, readers and others, and among the latter those who preside over physical requirements ; the publicity of a royal life is so great that none of its functions can be exercised without witnesses. At the moment of the approach of the officers of the wardrobe to dress him <~he first gentleman, notified by an usher, advances to read to tne king the names of the grandees who are waiting at the door: this is the fourth entry called "la chambre," and larger than thobc pre- ceding it; for, not to mention the cloak-bearers, gun-bearers, rug-bearers and other valets, it comprises most of the superior officials, the grand-almoner, the almoners on duty, the chaplain, the master of the oratory, the captain and major of the body- 'guard, the colonel-general and major of the French guards, the colonel of the king's regiment, the captain of the Cent Suisses, 1 Warroquier, I. 94. Compare corresponding details under Louis XVI. in St Siiaso, Kill. 88. 106 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK n the grand-huntsman, the grand wolf-huntsman, the grand provost, the grand-master and master of ceremonies, the firs butler, the grand-master of the pantry, the foreign ambassa- dors, the ministers and secretaries of state, the marshals of France and most of the seigniors and prelates of distinction. Ushers place the ranks in order and, if necessary, impose silence. Meanwhile the king washes his hands and begins his toilet Two pages remove his slippers; the grand-master of the wardrob* draws off his night-shirt by the right arm, and the first valet of the wardrobe by the left arm, and both of them hand it to an officer of the wardrobe, whilst a valet of the wardrobe fetches the shirt wrapped up in white taffeta. Things have now reached the solemn point, the culmination of the ceremony; the fifth entry has been introduced and, in a few moments, after the king has put his shirt on, all that is left of those who are known, with other house- hold officers waiting in the gallery, complete the influx. There is quite a formality in regard to this shirt. The honor of handing it is reserved to the sons and grandsons of France; in default of these to the princes of the blood or those legitimated; in their default to the grand-chamberlain or to the first gentleman of the bedchamber; the latter case, it must be observed, being very /are, the princes being obliged to be present at the king's lever as well as the princesses at that of the queen. 1 At last the shirt is presented and a valet carries off the old one; the first valet of the wardrobe and the first valet-de-chambre hold the fresh one, each by a right and left arm respectively, 2 while two other valets, during this operation, extend his dressing-gown in front of him to serve as a screen. The shirt is now on his back and the toilet commences. A valet-de-chambre supports a mirror be- fore the king while two others on the two sides light it up, if occasion requires, with flambeaux. Valets of the wardrobe fetch the rest of the attire; the grand-master of the wardrobe puts the vest on and the doublet, attaches the blue ribbon, and clasps his sword around him; then a valet assigned to the cravats brings several of these in a basket, while the master of the wardrobe arranges around the king's neck that which the king selects After this a valet assigned to the handkerchiefs brings three of 1 " Marie Antoinette," by d'Arneth and Geflroy, II. 217. * In all changes of the coat the left arm of the king is appropriated to the wardrobe and 'he right arm to the " chambre." CHAP. I. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 107 these on a silver salver, while the grand-master of the wardrobe offers the salver to the king who chooses one. Finally the master of the wardrobe hands to the king his hat, his gloves and his cane. The king then steps to the side of the bed, kneels on a cushion and says his prayers whilst an almoner in a low voice recites the orison qucesumus, deus omnipotens. This done, the king announces the order of the day and passes with the leading persons of his court into his cabinet where he sometimes gives audience. Meanwhile the rest of the company await him in th gallery in order to accompany him to mass when he comes out Such is the lever, a piece in five acts. Nothing could be con- trived better calculated to fill up the void of an aristocratic life ; a hundred or thereabouts of notable seigniors dispose of a couple of hours in coming, in waiting, in entering, in defiling, in taking positions, in standing on their feet, in maintaining an air of respeot and of ease suitable to a superior class of walking gen- tlemen, while those best qualified are about to do the same thing over in the queen's apartment. 1 The king, however, to offset this suffers the same torture and the same inaction as he imposes. He also is playing a part ; all his steps and all his gestures have been determined beforehand; he has been obliged to arrange his physiognomy and his voice, never to depart from an affable and dignified air, to award judiciously his glances and his nods, to keep silent or to speak only of the chase, and to suppress his own thoughts, if he has any. One cannot indulge in revery, meditate or be absent-minded when one is before the footlights ; the part must have due attention. Besides, in a drawing-room there is only drawing-room conversation, and the master's thoughts, instead of being directed in a profitable channel, must be scattered about as if the holy water of the court. All hours of the day are thus occupied, except three or four in the morning, during which he is at the council or in his private room; it must 1 rije queen breakfasts in bed, and "there are ten or twelve persons present at this recep- tion," . . . the grand receptions taking place at the dressing hour. " This reception com- prised the princes of the blood, the captains of the guards and most of the grand-officers." The same ceremony occurs with the chemise as with the king's shirt. One winter uay Mme. Campan offers the chemise to the queen when a lady of honor enters, removes her gloTes and takes the chemise in her hands. A movement at the door and the Duchess of Orleans comes in, takes off her gloves aid she receives the chemise. Another movemenl and it is the Comtesse d'Artois whose privilege it is to hand the chemise. Meanwhile th queen sits there shivering with her arms crossed on her breast and muttering, " It is dreadful what importunity !" (Mme. Campan, II. 217; III. 309-316). foS THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK n. be noted, too, that on the days after his hunts, on returning home from Rambouillet at three o'clock in the morning, he must sleep the few hours he has left to him. The ambassador Mercy, 1 never- theless, a man of close application, seems to think it sufficient; he, at least, thinks that " Louis XVI. is a man of order, losing n 10' (14 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK n. Penthievre at Sceaux, Anet and Chateauvilain. I omit one-half of these residences. At the Palais- Royal those who are presented may come to the supper on opera days. At Chateauvilain all those who come to pay court are invited to dinner, the nobles at the duke's table and the rest at the table of his first gentleman. At the Temple one hundred and fifty guests attend the Monday suppers. Forty or fifty persons, said the Duchesse de Maine, constitute "a prince's private company." 1 The princes' train is so inseparable from their persons that it follows them even into camp. "The Prince de Conde," says M. de Luynes, "sets out for the army to-morrow with a large suite : he has two hundred and twenty-five horses, and the Comte de la Marche one hundred. M. le due d'Or!6ans leaves on Monday; he has three hundred and fifty horses for himself and suite." 2 Below the rank of the king's relatives all the grandees who figure at the court figure as well in their own residences, at their hotels at Paris or at Versailles, also in their chateaux a few leagues away from Paris. On all sides, in the memoirs, we obtain a foreshortened view of some one of these seignorial existences. Such is that of the Due de Gevres, first gentleman of the bedchamber, governor of Paris, and of the Ile-de-France, possessing besides this the special governorships of Laon, Soissons, Noyon, Crespy and Valois, the captainry of Mousseaux, also a pension of twenty thousand livres, a veritable man of the court, a sort of sample in high relief of the people of his class, and who, through his appointments, his favor, his luxury, his debts, the consideration he enjoys, his tastes, his occupations and his turn of mind presents to us an abridgment of the fashionable world. 3 His memory for relation- ships and genealogies is surprising; he is an adept in the precious science of etiquette, and on these two grounds he is an oracle and much consulted. " He greatly increased the beauty of his house and gardens at Saint-Ouen. At the moment of his death," says the Due de Luynes, " he had just added twenty-five arpents to it which he had begun to enclose with a covered 1 Beugnot, I. 77. Mme. de Genlis, "M6moires," ch. xvii. De Goncourt, "La Femme >u dix-huitieme siecle," 52. Champfort, "Caracteres et Anecdotes." 2 De Luynes, XVI. 57 (May, 1757). In the army of Westphalia the Count d'Estres, commander-in-chief, had twenty-seven secretaries, and Gremin was the twenty-eighth. When the Due de Richelieu set out for his government of Guyenne he was obliged to have relays of a hundred horses along the entire road. De Luynes, XVI. i85 (October, 1757). CHAP. i. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 115 terrace. . . . He had quite a large household of gentlemen, pages, and domestics of various kinds, and his expenditure was enormous. . . . He gave a grand dinner every day. . . . He gave special audiences almost daily. There was no one at the court, nor in the city, who did not pay their respects to him. The ministers, the royal princes themselves did so. He received company whilst still in bed. He wrote and dictated amidst a large assemblage. . . . His house at Paris and his apartment at Versailles were never empty from the time he arose till the time he retired." Two or three hundred households at Paris, at Versailles and in their environs offer a similar spectacle. Never is there solitude. It is the custom in France, says Horace Walpole, to burn your candle down to its snuff in public. The mansion of the Duchesse de Gramont is besieged at day- break by the noblest seigniors and the noblest ladies. Five times a week, under the Due de Choiseul's roof, the butler enters the drawing-room at ten o'clock in the evening to bestow a glance on the immense crowded gallery and decide if he shall lay the cloth for fifty, sixty or eighty persons ; 1 with this example before them all the rich establishments soon glory in providing an open table for all comers. Naturally, the parvenues, the financiers who have purchased or taken the name of an estate, all those traffickers and sons of traffickers who, since Law, associate with the nobility, imitate their ways. And I do not allude to the Bourets, the Beaujons, the St. Jameses and other financial spend- thrifts whose show and pomp effaces that of the princes ; but take a plain assocti des fermes, M. d'Epinay, whose modest and refined wife refuses such excessive display. 2 He had just com- pleted his domestic arrangements, and was anxious that his wife should take a second maid ; but she resisted ; nevertheless, in this curtailed household, "the officers, women and valets, amounted to sixteen. . . . When M. d'Epinay gets up his valet enters on his duties. Two lackeys stand by awaiting his orders. The first secretary enters for the purpose of giving an account of the letters received by him and which he has to open ; but he is interrupted two hundred times in this business by all sorts of people imaginable. Now it is a horse-jockey with the finest horses to sell. . . . Again some scrapegrace who calls to screech * De Goncourt, ibid. 73, 75. * Mrae. d'Epinay, " Mlmoires." Ed. Boiteau, I. 306 (1751). n6 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK IL out a piece of music and in whose behalf some influence ha been exerted to get him into the opera, after giving him a few lessons in good taste and teaching him what is proper in French music. Again a young lady who is made to wait to ascertain if I am still at home. ... I get up and go out. Two lackeys open the folding doors to let me pass, I who could pass through the eye of a needle, while two servants bawl out in the ante- chamber, ' Madame, gentlemen, Madame ! ' All form a line, the gentlemen consisting of dealers in stuffs, in instruments, jewellers, hawkers, lackeys, shoeblacks, creditors, in short everything im- aginable that is most ridiculous and annoying. The clock strikes twelve or one before this toilet matter is over, and the secretary, who, doubtless, knows by experience the impossibility of render ing a detailed statement of his business, hands to his master a small memorandum informing him what he must say in the as- sembly of fermiers" Indolence, disorder, debts, ceremony, the tone and ways of the patron, all seems a parody of the real thing. We are beholding the last stages of aristocracy. And yet the court of M. d'Epinay is a miniature resemblance of that of the king. So much more essential is it that the ambassadors, ministers and general officers who represent the king should display them- selves in a grandiose manner. No circumstance rendered the ancient regime as brilliant and more oppressive; in this, as in all the rest, Louis XIV. is the principal author of evil as of good. The policy which fashioned the court prescribed ostentation " He was pleased to see a display of dress, table, equipages, buildings and play ; these afforded him opportunities for entering into conversation with people. The contagion had spread from the court into the provinces and to the armies where people, of any position, were esteemed only in proportion to their table and magnificence." : During the year passed by the Marshal de Belle- Isle at Frankfort, on account of the election of Charles VI., he expended 750,000 livres in journeys, transportations, festivals anc 1 St Simon, XII. 457, and Dangeau, VI. 408. The Marshal de Boufflers at the camp a Compiegne (September, 1698) had every night and morning two tables for twenty an- twenty-five persons, besides extra tables ; 72 cooks, 340 domestics, 400 dozens of napkinr 80 dozens of silver plates, 6 dozens of porcelain plates. Fourteen relays of horses brought fruits and liquors daily from Paris ; every day an express brought fish, poultry and gam* from Ghent, Brussels, Dunkirk, Dieppe and Calais. Fifty dozens of wine were drunk o* ordinary days, and eighty dozens during the visits of the king and the princes. CHAP. I. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 117 dinners, in constructing a kitchen and dining-hall, and besides all this, 150,000 livres in snuff-boxes, watches and other presents; by order of Cardinal Fleury, so economical, he had in his kitchens one hundred and one officials. 1 At Vienna, in 1772, the ambas- sador, the Prince de Rohan, had two carriages costing together 40,000 livres, forty horses, seven noble pages, six gentlemen, five secretaries, ten musicians, twelve footmen, and four grooms whose gorgeous liveries each cost 4,000 livres, and the rest in proportion. We are familiar with the profusion, the good taste, the exquisite dinners, the admirable ceremonial display of the Cardinal de Bernis in Rome. " He was called the king of Rome and indeed he was such through his magnificence and in the consideration he enjoyed. . . . His table afforded an idea of what is possible. ... In festivities, ceremonies and illuminations he was always be- yond comparison." He himself remarked, smiling, " I keep a French inn on the cross-roads of Europe." 3 Accordingly their salaries and indemnities are two or three times more ample than at the present day. "The king gives 50,000 crowns to the great embassies. The Due de Duras received even 200,000 livres per annum for that of Madrid, also, besides this, 100,000 crowns gra- tuity, 50,000 livres for secret service and he had the loan of furni- ture and effects valued at 400,000 and 500,000 livres, of which he kept one-half." 4 The outlays and salaries of the ministers are similar. In 1789, the Chancellor gets 120,080 livres salary and the Keeper of the Seals 135,000. " M. de Villedeuil, as Secretary of State, was to have had 180,670 livres, but as he rep- resented that this sum would not cover his expenses, his salary was raised to 226,000 livres, everything included." 5 Moreover, the rule is, that on retiring from office the king awards them a pen- sion of 20,000 livres and gives a dowry of 200,000 livres to their daughters. This is not excessive considering the way they live. " They are obliged to maintain such state in their households, for * De Luynes, XIV. 149. * Abb6 Georgel, "Mmoires," 216. Sainte-Beuve, " Causeries du lundi," VIII. 63, the texts of two witnesses, MM. de GenlU and Roland. 4 De Luynes, XV. 435, and XVI. 219 (1757). "The Marshal de Belle-Iie contracted an indebtedness amounting to 1,200,000 livres, one-quarter of it for pleasure-houses and the rest In the king's service. The king, to indemnify him, gives him 400,000 livres on the salt revenue, and 80,000 livres income on the company privileged to refine the precious metals." * Report of fixed incomes and expenditures, May ist, 1789, p. 633. These figures, It Bust be noted, must be doubled to have their actual equivalent. u8 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK n they cannot enrich themselves by their places. All keep open table at Paris three days in the week, and at Fontainebleau, every day." 1 M. de Lamoignon being appointed Chancellor with a salary of 100,000 livres, people at once declare that he will be ruined ; a " for he has taken all the officials of M. d'Aguesseau'a kitchen, whose table alone cost 80,000 livres. The banquet he gave at Versailles to the first council held by him cost 6,000 livres, and he must always have seats at table, at Versailles and at Paris, for twenty persons." At Chambord, 3 Marshal de Saxe always has two tables, one for sixty, and the other for eighty persons, also four hundred horses in his stables, a civil list of more than 100,000 crowns, a regiment of Uhlans for his guard, and a theatre costing over 600,000 livres, while the life he leads, or which is maintained around him, resembles one of Rubens's bacchanalian scenes. As to the special and general provii cial governors we have seen that, when they reside on the spot, they fulfil no other duty than to entertain ; alongside of them the in- tendant, who alone attends to business, likewise receives, and magnificently, especially in the country of a States-General. Commandants, lieutenants-general, the envoys of the central government throughout, are equally induced by habit and propri- ety, as well as by their own lack of occupation, to maintain a draw- ing-room ; they bring along with them the elegancies and hospi- tality of Versailles. If the wife follows them she becomes weary and " vegetates in the midst of about fifty companions, talking nothing but commonplace, knitting or playing loto, and sitting three hours at the dinner table." But " all the military men, all the neighboring gentry and all the ladies in the town," eagerly crowd to her balls and delight in commending " her grace, her politeness, her equality." 4 These sumptuous habits prevail even among people of secondary position. By virtue of established usage colonels and captains entertain their subordinates and thus expend " much beyond their salaries." 5 This is one of the rea- sons why regiments are reserved for the sons of the best 1 Mme. de Genlis, "Diet, des Etiquettes," I. 349. * Barbier, "Journal," III. 211 (December, 1750). 1 Aubertin, " L' Esprit public au dix-huitieme siecle 255. Mme. de Genlis, " Adele et Theodore," III. 54. 5 Due de Levis, 68. The same thing is found, previous to the late reform, in the English array. Cf. Voltaire, "Entretiens entre A, B, C, ' isth entretiens. "A regiment is not th reward for services but the prize for the sum which the parents of a young man advance 1 rder that he may go to the provinr es for three months in the year and keep open house." CHAP. I. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. II* families and companies in them for wealthy gentlemen. The vast royal tree, expanding so luxuriantly at Versailles, sends forth its offshoots to overrun France by thousands and to bloom every- where, as at Versailles, in bouquets of holiday sport and of drawing-room sociability. VII. Following this pattern, and as well through the effect of tem- perature, we see, even in remote provinces, all aristocratic branches tending to a worldly efflorescence. Lacking other em- ployment, the nobles interchange visits, and the chief function of a prominent seignior is to do the honors of his house credit itably. This applies as well to ecclesiastics as to laymen. The one hundred and thirty-one bishops and archbishops, the seven hundred abbeVcommendatory, are all men of the world; they behave well, are rich, and are not austere, while their episcopal palace or abbey is for them a country-house, which they repair or embellish with a view to the time they pass in it, and to the company they welcome to it. 1 At Clairvaux, Dom Rocourt, very affable with men and still more gallant with the ladies, never drives out except with four horses, and with a mounted groom ahead ; his monks do him the honors of a Monseigneur, and he maintains a veritable court. The chartreuse of Val Saint-Pierre is a sumptuous palace in the centre of an immense domain, and the father-procurator, Dom Effinger, passes his days in entertain- ing his guests. 2 At the convent of Origny, near Saint-Quentin, 3 " the abbess has her domestics and her carriage and horses, and receives men on visits, who dine in her apartments." The prin- cess Christine, abbess of Remiremont, with her lady canonesses, are almost always travelling; and yet "they enjoy themselves in the abbey," entertaining there a good many people "in the private apartments of the princess, and in the strangers' rooms." 4 The twenty-five noble chapters of women, and the nineteen noble chapters of men, are as many permanent drawing-rooms and gathering places incessantly resorted to by the fine society which a slight ecclesiastical barrier scarcely divides from the great 1 Beugnot, I. 79. * Merlin de Thionville, " Vie et Correspondances. ' Accouct of his visit to the chartretiM of Val St. Pierre in Thierarche. 1 Mme. de Genlis, " Meinoires, * ch. vti. Mme. d'Oberkirk, I. 15. 120 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK IL world from which it is recruited. At the chapter of Alix, neai Lyons, the canonesses wear hoopskirts into the choir, "dressed as in the world outside," except that their black silk robes and their mantles are lined with ermine. 1 At the chapter of Ott- marsheim in Alsace, "our week was passed in promenading, in visiting the traces of R oman roads, in laughing a good deal, and even in dancing, for there were many people visiting the abbey, and especially to talk over dresses." Near Sarrelouis, the canon- esses of Loutre dine with the officers and are anything but pru- dish. 2 Numbers of convents serve as agreeable and respectable asylums for widowed ladies, for young women whose husbands are in the army, and for young ladies of rank, while the superior, generally some noble damsel, wields, with ease and dexterity, the sceptre of this pretty feminine world. But nowhere is the pomp of hospitality, or the concourse greater, than in the episcopal pal- aces. I have described the situation of the bishops ; with their opulence, possessors of the like feudal rights, heirs and successors to the ancient sovereigns of the territory, and besides all this, men of the world and frequenters of Versailles, why should they not keep a court ? A Cice, archbishop of Bordeaux, a Dillon, arch- bishop of Narbonne, a Brienne, archbishop of Toulouse, a Cas- tellane, bishop of Mende and seignior-suzerain of the whole of Gevaudan, an archbishop of Cambrai, duke of Cambray, seign- ior-suzerain of the whole of Cambre'sis, and president by birth of the provincial States- General, are nearly all princes ; why not parade themselves like princes? Hence, they build, hunt and have their clients and guests, a lever, an antechamber, ushers, offi- cers, a free table, a complete household, equipages, and, oftener still, debts, the finishing touch of a grand seignior. In the al- most regal palace which the Rohans, hereditary bishops of Stras- bourg and cardinals from uncle to nephew, erected for themselves at Saverne 3 there are 700 beds, 180 horses, 14 butlers, and 25 valets. "The whole province assembles there;" the cardinal lodges as many as two hundred guests at a time, without count- ing the valets; at all times, there are found under his roof "from twenty to thirty ladies the most agreeable of the province, and 1 Mine, de Genlis, I. ch. xxvl Mme. d'Oberkirk, I. 6a. * De Lauzun, " Mimoires," 257. * Marquis de Valfons, " M6moires," 6a De LeVU, 156. Mme. d'Oberkirk, L 127., II CHAP. L HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 121 this number is often increased by those of the court and from Paris. . . . The entire company sup together at nine o'clock in the evening, which always looks like a f, p. 321. * Mme. de Genlis, " Souvenirs de Felicia," p. 160. It is Important, however, to call attention to the old-fashioned royal attitude under Louis XV. and even Louis XVI. " Although I was advised," says Alfieri, " that the king never addressed ordinary strangers, I could not digest the Olympian-Jupiter look with which Louis XV. measured the person presented to him, from head to foot, with such an impassible air; if a fly should be intro- duced to a giant, the giant, after looking at him, would smile, or perhaps remark. ' What a little mite ! ' In any event, if he said nothing, his face would express it for him." Alneti "M^moires," I. 138, 1768. See in Mme. d'Oberkirk's "Memoires," (II. 349), the lesso* administered by Mme. Roy ale, aged seven and a half years, to a lady introduced to her. CHAP. n. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 127 into epigrams and songs. One day, 1 in an assembly of young people belonging to the court, one of them, as the current witti- cism was passing around, raised his hands in delight and ex- claimed, "How can one help being pleased with great events, even with disturbances, when they give us such wit ! " Thereupon the wit circulates, and every disaster in France is turned into non- sense. A song on the battle of Hochstaedt was pronounced poor, and some one in this connection said: "I am sorry that battle was lost the song is so worthless." 3 Even when eliminating from this trait all that belongs to the sway of impulse and the license of paradox, there remains the stamp of an age in which the State is almost nothing and society almost everything. We may on this principle divine what order of talent was required in the ministers. M. Necker, having given a magnificent supper with serious and comic opera, " finds that this festivity is worth more to him in credit, favor, and sta- bility than all his financial schemes put together. . . . His las', arrangement concerning the vingtieme excited remark only for one day, while everybody is still talking about his fete; at Paris, as well as in Versailles, its attractions are dwelt on in de- tail, people emphatically declaring that Monsieur and Mme. Necker are a grace to society." 3 Good society devoted to pleasure imposes on those in office the obligation of providing pleasures for it. It might also say, in a half-serious, half-ironical tone, with Voltaire, "that the gods created kings only to give fStes every day provided they differ; that life is too short to make any other use of it ; that lawsuits, intrigues, warfare, and the quarrels of priests, which consume human life, are absurd and horrible things ; that man is born only to enjoy himself; " and that among the essential things we must put the "superfluous" in the first rank. According to this, we can easily foresee that they will be as little concerned with their private affairs as with public affairs. Housekeeping, the management of property, domestic economy, 1 Champfort, 26, 55; Bachaumont, 1. 136 (Sept. 7, 1762). One month alter the Parliament had passed a law against the Jesuits, little Jesuits in wax appeared, with a snail for a base. "By means of a thread the Jesuit was made to pop in and out from the shell. It is all tha tage there is no house without its Jesuit." * On the othe" hand, the song on the battle of Rosbach is fine. ' " Correspondance secrete," by M6tra, Imbert, etc. V. 277 (Nov. 17, 1777). Voltair* "Princess de Babtlone." 128 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK u are in their eyes vulgar, insipid in the highest degree, and only suited to an intendant or a butler. Of what use are such per- sons if we must have such cares ? Life is no longer a festival if one has to provide the ways and means. Comforts, luxuries, the agreeable must flow naturally and greet our lips of their own ac- cord. As a matter of course and without his intervention, a man belonging to this world should find gold always in his pocket, a handsome coat on his toilet table, powdered valets in his ante chamber, a gilded coach at his door, a fine dinner on his tatle, so that he may reserve all his attention to be expended in favois on the guests in his drawing-room. Such a mode of living is not to be maintained without waste, and the domestics, left to themselves, make the most of it. What matter is it, so long as they perform their duties ? Moreover, everybody must live, and it is pleasant to have contented and obsequious faces around one, Hence the first houses 'in the kingdom are given up to pillage Louis XV., on a hunting expedition one day, accompanied by the Due de Choiseul, 1 inquired of him how much he thought the carriage in which they were seated had cost. M. de Choi- seul replied that he should consider himself fortunate to get one like it for 5,000 or 6,000 francs; but, " His Majesty paying for it as a king, and not always paying cash, might have paid 8,000 francs for it. " " You are wide of the mark, " rejoined the king, "for this vehicle, as you see it, cost me 30,000 francs. . . . The robberies in my household are enormous, but it is impossi- ble to put a stop to them. " In effect, the great help themselves as well as the little, either in money, or in kind, or in services. There are in the king's household fifty-four horses for the grand equerry, thirty-eight of them being for Mme. de Brionne, the administratrix of the office of the stables during her son's minor- ity; there are two hundred and fifteen grooms on duty, and about as "many horses kept at the king's expense for various other persons, entire strangers to the department. 2 What a nest of parasites on this one branch of the royal tree ! Elsewhere I find Madame Elisabeth, so moderate, consuming fish amounting to 30,000 francs per annum; meat and game to 70,000 francs; can- files to 60,000 francs; Mesdames burn white and yellow candles to 1 De Bezenval, " Me'moires, ' II. 206. An anecdote related by the Duke. Archives nationales, a report by M. Texier (1780) A report by M. V esnard de Chouty 0. 738)- CHAP. II. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 129 the amount of 215,068 francs; the light for the queen comes to 157,109 francs. The street at Versailles is still shown, formerly lined with stalls, to which the king's valets resorted to nourish Ver- sailles by the sale of his dessert. There is no article from which the domestic insects do not manage to scrape and glean something. The king is supposed to drink orgeat and lemonade to the value of 2,190 francs; "The grand broth, day and night," which Mme. Royale, aged six years, sometimes drinks, costs 5,201 francs per annum. Towards the end of the preceding reign l the femmes- de-chambre enumerate in the Dauphine's outlay "four pairs of shoes per week; three ells of ribbon per diem, to tie her dress- ing-gown; two ells of taffeta per diem, to cover the basket in which she keeps her gloves and fan. " A few years earlier the king paid 200,000 francs for coffee, lemonade, chocolate, orgeat, and water-ices; several persons were inscribed on the list for ten or twelve cups a day, while it was estimated that the coffee, milk and bread each morning for each lady of the bed- chamber cost 2,000 francs per annum. 2 We can readily under- stand how, in households thus managed, the purveyors are willing to wait. They wait so well that often under Louis XV. they refuse to provide and " hide themselves. " Even the delay is so regular that at last they are obliged to pay them five per cent. interest on their advances; at this rate, in 1778, after all Turgot's economic reforms, the king still owes nearly 800,000 livres to his wine merchant, and nearly three millions and a half to his pur- veyor. 8 The same disorder exists in the houses which surround the throne. " Mme. de Gue'me'ne'e owes 60,000 livres to her shoe- maker, 16,000 livres to her paper-hanger, and the rest in propor- tion. " Another lady, whom the Marquis de Mirabeau sees with hired horses, replies at his look of astonishment, "It is not because there are not seventy horses in our stables, but none of them are able to walk to-day." 4 Mme. de Montmorin, on ascer- taining that her husband's debts are greater than his property, thinks she can save her dowry of 200,000 livres, but is informed that she had given security for a tailor's bill, which, "incredible 1 "Marie Antoinette," by d'Arneth and Geffrey, I. 277 (February 29, 1772). 2 De Luynes, XVII. 37 (August, 1758). D'Argenson, February n, 1753. 3 Archives nationales, O 1 , 738. Various sums of interest are paid : 12,969 francs to the baker, 39,631 francs to the wine merchant, and 173,899 francs to the purveyor. 4 Marquis de Mirabeau, " Traite de Population," 60. " Le Gouvernement de Nor- mandie," by Hippeau, II. 204 (Sept. 30, 1780), 130 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK 11 and ridiculous to say, amounts to the sum of 180,000 livres. >M " One of the decided manias of these days," says Mme. d'Ober- kirk, "is to be ruined in everything and by everything. " "The two brothers Villemer build country cottages at from 500,000 to 600,000 livres ; one of them keeps forty horses to ride occasion- ally in the Bois de Boulogne on horseback." 2 In one night M. de Chenonceaux, son of M. et Mme. Dupin, loses at play 700,000 livres. " M. de Chenonceaux, and M. de Francueil ran through seven or eight millions at this epoch." 3 "The Due de Lauzun, at the age of twenty-six, after having run through the capital of 100,000 crowns revenue, is prosecuted by his cred- itors for nearly two millions of indebtedness." 4 "M. le Prince de Conti lacks bread and wood, although with an income of 600,000 livres," for the reason that "he buys and builds wildly on all sides." 5 Where would be the pleasure if these people were reasonable ? What kind of a seignior is he who studies the price of things ? And how can the exquisite be reached if one grudges money? Money, accordingly, must flow and flow on until it is exhausted, first by the innumerable secret or tolerated bleedings through domestic abuses, and next in broad streams of the master's own prodigality, through structures, furniture, toilets^ hospitality, gallantry, and pleasures. The Comte d'Artois, that he may give the queen a fte, demolishes, rebuilds, arranges, and furnishes Bagatelle from top to bottom, employing nine hundred workmen, day and night, and, as there is no time to go any .dis- tance for lime, plaster, and cut stone, he sends patrols of the Swiss guards on the highways to sieze, pay for, and immediately bring in all carts thus loaded. 6 The Marshal de Soubise, enter- taining the king one day at dinner and over night, in his country house, expends 200,000 livres. 7 Mme. de Matignon makes a con- tract to be furnished every day with a new head-dress at 24,000 livres per annum. Cardinal de Rohan has an alb bordered with 1 Mme. de Larochejacquelein, " Memoires," p. 30. Mme. d'Oberkirk, II. 66. * D'Argenson, January 26, 1753. * George Sand, "Histoire de ma vie," I. 78. 4 "Marie Antoinette," by d'Ameth and Geflroy, I. 61 (March 18, 1777). ' D'Argenson, January 26, 1753. ' "Marie Antoinette," III. 135, November 19, 1777. r Barbier, IV., 155. The Marshal de Soubise had a hunting lodge to which the king cam* from time to tiiie to iat an omelet of pheasants' eggs, costing 157 livres, 10 sous. (Mercier, XII. 192; also, according to the cook's statement who made it) CHAP. ii. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 131 point lace, which is valued at more than 100,000 livres, while his kitchen utensils are of massive silver. 1 Nothing is more natural, considering their ideas of money; hoarded and piled up, instead of being a fertilizing stream, it is a useless marsh exhaling bad odors. The queen, having presented the Dauphin with a carriage whose silver-gilt trappings are decked with rubies and sapphires, naively exclaims, " Has not the king added 200,000 livres to my treasury? That is no reason for keeping them ! " 2 They would rather throw it out of the win- dow, which was actually done by the Marshal de Richelieu with a purse he had given to his grandson, and which the lad, not know- ing how to use, brought back intact. Money, on this occasion, was at least of service to the passing street-sweeper that picked it up. But had there been no passer-by to pick it up, it would have been thrown into the river. One day Mme. de B , being with the Prince de Conti, hinted that she would like a miniature of her canary bird set in a ring. The Prince offers to have it made. His offer is accepted, but on condition that the miniature be set plain and without jewels. Accordingly the miniature is placed in a simple rim of gold. But, to cover over the painting, a large diamond, made very thin, serves as a glass. Mme. de B , having returned the diamond, "M. le Prince de Conti had it ground to powder which he used to dry the ink of the note he wrote to Mme. de B on the subject." This pinch of pow- der cost four or five thousand livres, but we may divine the turn and tone of the note. The extreme of profusion must accom- pany the height of gallantry, the man of the world being so much the more important according to his contempt for money. III. In a drawing-room, the woman to whom a man pays the least attention is his wife, and the same with her. Hence, at a time like this, when people live for society and in society, there is no place for conjugal intimacy. Moreover, when a mar- ried couple occupy an exalted position they are separated by cus- 1 Mme. d'Oberldrk, I. 129, II. 257. * Mme. de Genlis, "Souvenirs de Felicie," 80; and "Theatre de 1'Education," II. 367. A rirtuous young woman in ten months runs into debt to the amount of 70,000 francs: "Ten louis for a small table, 15 louis for another, 800 francs for a bureau, 200 francs for a small writing desk, 300 francs for a large one; hair rings, hair glass, hair chain, hair bracelets, rul< ttaps, hair necklace, hair box, 9,900 francs," etc. 132 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK u torn and decorum. Each party has his or her own household, 01 at least their own apartments, servants, equipage, receptions and distinct society, and, as self-parade entails ceremony, they stand towards each other in deference to their rank on the footing of polite strangers. They are each announced in each other's apart- ment ; they address each other " Madame, Monsieur," and not alone in public, but in private ; they shrug their shoulders when, sixty leagues off from Paris, they encounter in some old chateau a provincial wife ignorant enough to say " my dear " to her hus- band before company. 1 Already separated at the fireside, the two lives diverge beyond it at an ever increasing radius. The husband has a government of his own : his private command, his private regiment, his post at court, which keeps him absent from home ; only in his declining years does his wife consent to follow him into garrison or into the provinces. 2 And rather is this the case because she is herself occupied, and as seriously as himself; often with a position near a princess, and always with an important circle of company which she must maintain. A woman, in these days, bestirs herself like a man, 3 in the same career, and with the same arms, consisting of the smooth tongue, the winning grace, the insinuating manner, the tact, the quick perception of the right moment, and the art of pleasing, demanding, and obtaining, there is not a lady at court who does not bestow regiments and benefices. Through this right the wife has her personal retinue of solicitors and protege's, also, like her husband, her friends, her enemies, her own ambitions, disappointments, and rancorous feel- ing; nothing could be more effectual in the disruption of a household than this similarity of occupation and this division of interests. The tie thus loosened ends by being sundered under > Mme. de Genlis, " Adele et Theodore," III. 14. * Mme. d'Avray, sister of Mme. de Genlis, sets the example, for which she is at first much criticized. * "When I arrived in France M, de Choiseul's reign was just over. The wife who could please him, or even please his sister-in-law the Duchesse de Gramont, was sure of setting crazy every colonel and lieutenant-general she was acquainted with. Women were of conse- quence even in the eyes of the old and of the clergy ; they were thoroughly familiar, to an extraordinary degree, with the march of events; they knew by heart the characters and habits of the king's friends and ministers. One of these, on returning to his chateau from Versailles, informed his wife about every thing with which he had been occupied ; with us he says one or two words to her about her water-color sketches, or remains silent and thoughtful, pondering over what he has just heard in Parliament Our poor ladies are abandoned to the tociety of those frivolous men who, for want of intellect, have no ambition, and of course no employment (dandies)." (Stendhal, "Rome, Naples, and Florence," 377. A narrative bj Colonel Forsyth). CHAP. n. ITABITS AND CHARACTERS. 133 the ascendency of opinion. " It looks well not to live together," to grant each other every species of tolerance, and to devote oneself to society. Society, indeed, then fashions opinion, ana through opinion it urges on the habits which it requires. Toward the middle of the century the husband and wife lodge under the same roof, but that is all. "They are never at home in private; they are never encountered in the same carriage; they are never met in the same house; nor, through the necessity of the case, are they ever together in public." Profound senti- ment would have seemed odd and even "ridiculous;" in any event unbecoming ; it would have been as unacceptable as an earnest "aside" in the general current of light conversation. Each has a duty to all, and for a couple to entertain each other is isolation ; in company there exists no right of the tete-a-te'te. 1 It was hardly allowed for a few days to lovers. 2 And even then it was regarded unfavorably ; they were found too much occupied with each other. Their preoccupation diffused around them an at- mosphere of "constraint and ennui ; one had to be upon one's guard and to check oneself." They were "dreaded." The exigencies of society are those of an absolute king, and admit of no partition. " If morals lost by this, society was infinitely the gainer," says M. de Bezenval, a contemporary; "having got rid of the annoyances and dulness caused by the husbands' presence, the freedom was extreme ; the coquetry both of men and women kept up social vivacity and daily provided piquant adventures." Nobody is jealous, not even when in love. "People are mutually pleased and become attached; if one grows weary of the other, they part with as little concern as they came together. Should the sentiment revive they take to each other with as much vivacity as if it were the first time they had been engaged. They may again separate, but they never quarrel. As they have become enamored without love, they part without hate, deriving from the feeble desire they have inspired the advantage of being always ready to oblige." 3 Appearances, moreover, are respected. An uninformed stranger would detect 1 De Bezenval, 49, 60. "Out of twenty seigniors at the court there are fifteen not living ith their wives, and keeping mistresses. Nothing is so common at Paris among certain pel* ns." (Barbier, IV. 496.) ' Ne soyez point epoux, ne soyez point amant Soyez 1'homme du jour et vous serez channant Crebillon y?/s, "La nuit et le moment," IX. 14. ?34 THE AN: TENT REGIME. BOOK n nothing to excite suspicion. An extreme curiosity, says Horace Walpole, 1 or a great familiarity with things, is necessary to detect the slightest intimacy between the two sexes. No familiarity is allowed except under the guise of friendship, while the vocabulary of love is as much prohibited as its rites apparently are. Even with Cre"billon fits, even with Laclos, at the most exciting mo- ments, the terms their characters employ are circumspect and irreproachable. Whatever indecency there may be, it is never expressed in words, the sense of propriety in language imposing itself not only on the outbursts of passion, but again on the grossness of instincts. Thus do the sentiments which are nat- urally the strongest lose their point and sharpness ; their rich and polished remains are converted into playthings for the drawing- room, and, thus cast to and fro by the whitest hands, fall on the floor like a shuttlecock. We must, on this point, listen to the heroes of the epoch ; their free and easy tone is inimitable, and it depicts both them and their actions. " I conducted myself," says the Due de Lauzun, " very prudently, and even deferentially with Mme. de Lauzun ; I knew Mme. de Cambis very openly for whom I concerned myself very little ; I kept the little Eugenie whom I loved a great deal; I played high, I paid my court to the king, and I hunted with him with great punctuality." 2 He had for others, withal, that indulgence of which he himself stood in need. " He was asked what he would say if his wife ( whom he had not seen for ten years ) should write to him that she had just discovered that she was enceinte. He reflected a moment and then replied, ' I would write, and tell her that I was delighted that heaven had blessed our union; be careful of your health; I will call and pay my respects this evening.' " There are countless replies of the same sort, and I venture to say that, without hav- ing read them, one could not imagine to what a degree social art had overcome natural instincts. 1 Horace Walpole's letters (January 25, 1766). The Duke de Brissac, at Louvecdennes, the lover of Mme. du Barry, and passionately fond of her, always in her society assumed the attitude of 3. polite stranger. (Mme. Vigee-Lebrun, "Souvenirs," I. 165.) 1 De Lauzun, 31- Champfort, 39. "TheDucde whose wife had just been the subject of scandal, complained to her mother-in-law ; the latter replied with the greatest coolness, 'Eh, Monsieur, you make a good deal of talk about nothing. Your father was accustomed to better company.'" (Mme. d'Oberki k, II. 135, 241). "A husband said to his wife, 'I allow you everybody outside of priaces and lackeys.' He was true to the feet, these two ex- tremes bringing dishonor on account of the scandal attached to them." (Senac de Meilhan, "Considerations sur les Moeurs"). On a wife being discovered by a husband, he simply e claims, "Madame, what imprudence 1 Suppose that I was any other man." ("la femmt mi dix-huitieme siecle," aoi.) CRAP. H. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 135 " Here at Paris," writes Mme. d'Oberkirk, " I am no longer my own mistress. I scarcely have time to talk with my husband and to answer my letters. I do not know what women do that are accustomed to lead this life ; they certainly have no families to look after, nor children to educate." At all events they act as if they had none, and the men likewise. Married people not living together live but rarely with their children, and the causes which disintegrate wedlock also disintegrate the family. In the first place there is the aristocratic tradition, which interposes a barrier between parents and children with a view to maintain a respectful distance. Although enfeebled and about to disappear, 1 this tradition still subsists. The son savs " Monsieur " to his father; the daughter comes "respectfully" to kiss her mother's hand at her toilet. A caress is rare and seems a favor; children generally, when with their parents, are silent, the sentiment that usually animates them being that of deferential timidity. At one time they were regarded as so many subjects, and up to a certain point they are so still ; while the new exigencies of worldly life place them or keep them effectually aside. M. de Talleyrand stated that he had never slept under the same roof with his father and mother. And if they do sleep there, they are not the less neglected. "I was entrusted," says the Count de Tilly, "to valets and to a kind of preceptor resembling these in more re- spects than one." During this time his father ran after women. " I have known him," adds the young man, " to have mistresses up to an advanced age ; he was always adoring them and con- stantly abandoning them." The Due de Lauzun finds it difficult to obtain a good tutor for his son; for this reason the latter writes, " he conferred the duty on one of my late mother's lackeys who could read and write tolerably well, and to whom the title of valet-de-chambre was given to insure greater consideration. They gave me the most fashionable teachers besides; but M. Roch (which was my mentor's name) was not qualified to arrange 1 See in this relation the somewhat ancient types, especially in the provinces. " My mother, my sister, and myself, transformed into statues by my father's presence, only recover ourselves after he leaves the room." (Chateaubriand, "Memoires," I. 17, 28, 130; "M6moires de Mirabeau," I. 53.) The Marquis said of his father Antoine: "I never had the honor of kiss. Ing the cheek of that venerable man. ... At the Academy, being two hundred league! aw-iy from him, the mere thought of him made me dread every youthful amusement which could be followed by the least unfavorable results." Paternal authori- v seems almost rs rigit ttiong the middle and lower classes. ("Beaumarchais et son temps," by De Lomenk I. 23 "Vie de mon pere," by Resrif de la Bretonne, passim.) 136 THE ANCIENT REGIME. BOOK P their lessons, nor to qualify me to benefit by them. I was, more- over, like all the children of my age and of my station, dressed in the handsomest clothes to go out, and naked and dying with hunger in the house," l and not through unkindness, but through household oversight, dissipation, and disorder, attention being given to things elsewhere. One might easily count the fathers who, like the Marshal de Belle-Isle, brought up their sons under their own eyes, and themselves attended to their education me- thodically, strictly, and with tenderness. As to the girls, they were placed in convents; relieved from this care, their parents only enjoy the greater freedom. Even when they retain charge of them they are scarcely more of a burden to them. Little F6- licite" de Saint- Aubin 2 sees her parents " only on their waking up and at meal times." Their day is wholly taken up ; the mother is making or receiving visits ; the father is in his laboratory or en- gaged in hunting. Up to seven years of age the child passes her time with chambermaids who teach her only a little catechism, " with an infinite number of ghost stories." About this time she is taken care of, but in a way which well portrays the epoch. The Marquise, her mother, the author of mythological and pas- toral operas, has a theatre built in the chateau ; a great crowd of company resorts to it from Bourbon-Lancy and Moulins; after rehearsing twelve weeks the little girl, with a quiver of arrows and blue wings, plays the part of Cupid, and the costume is so be- coming she is allowed to wear it in common during the entire day for nine months. To finish the business they send for a dancing- fencing master, and, still wearing the Cupid costume, she takes les- sons in fencing and in deportment. " The entire winter is devoted to playing comedy and tragedy." Sent out of the room after din- ner, she is brought in again only to play on the harpsichord or to declaim the monologue of Alzire before a numerous assembly. Undoubtedly such extravagances are not customary; but the spirit of education is everywhere the same ; that is to say, in the eyes of parents there is but one intelligible and rational existence, that of society, even for children, and the attentions bestowed on these are solely with a view to introduce them into it or to prepare them for it. 1 Sainte-Beuve, "Nouveaux Lundis," XII. 13; Comte de Tilly, "M&noires," I. u; Duf de Lauzun, 5 : " Beaumarchals," by De Lomnie, II. 298. Madame de Genlis, "Mmoires," ch ii. and iiL CHAP. II. HABITS AND CHARACTERS. 13; Even in the last years of the ancient regime l little boys have their hair powdered, " a pomatumed chignon (bourse), ringlets, and curls"; they wear the sword, the chapeau under the arm, a frill, and a coat with gilded cuffs ; they kiss young ladies' hands with the air of little dandies. A lass of six years is bound up in a whalebone waist; her large hoop-petticoat supports a skirt covered with wreaths ; she wears on her head a skilful combina- tion of false curls, puffs, and knots, fastened with pins, and crowned with plumes, and so high that frequently "the chin is half way down to her feet " ; sometimes they put rouge on hex face. She is a miniature lady, and she knows it ; she is fully up in her part, without effort or inconvenience, by force of habit ; the unique, the perpetual instruction she gets is that on her de- portment ; it may be said with truth that the fulcrum of education in this country is the dancing-master. 2 They could get along with him without any others ; without him the others were of no use. For, without him, how could people go through easily, suitably, and gracefully the thousand and one actions of daily life, walking, sitting down, standing up, offering the arm, using the fan, listening and smiling, before eyes so experienced and before such a refined public ? This is to be the great thing for them when they become men and women, and for this reason it is the thing of chief importance for them as children. Along with graces of attitude and of gesture, they already have those of the mind and of expression. Scarcely is their tongue loosened when they speak the polished language of their parents. The latter amuse themselves with them and use them as pretty dolls ; the preach- ing of Rousseau, which, during the last third of the last century, brought children into fashion, produces no other effect. They aie made to recite their lessons in public, to perform in proverbs, to take parts in pastorals. Their sallies are encouraged. They know how to turn a compliment, to invent a clever or affecting repartee, to be gallant, sensitive, and even spirituelle. The little Due d'Angouleme, holding a book in his hand, receives Suffien, whom he addresses thus : " I was reading Plutarch and his illus- 1 Mme. d'Oberkirk, II. 35. This fashion lasts until 1783. De Goncourt, "La femnie 411 dix-huitieme siecle," 415. "Les perits parrains," an engraving by Moreau. Berquin, "L'amJ des enfants," passim. Mme. de Genlis, "Theatre de V Education," passim. * Le Sage, "Gil Bias" : the difcourse of the dancing-master charged with tb education