LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN 627.8 Un32^u v. 3 cop. 2 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/locksdamno26repl03unit mm if mm mr VTLT i 'i 1 77 LOC PLAC ! NT UPPER MlSSISSfPPI RIVER BASIN MISSISSIPPI RIVER -ALTON ILLINOIS MISSOURI AND ILLINOIS The Library of ttit OCT 9 1975 University et Illinois at Urbana-Chempalgn DESIGN MEMORANDUM NO. II FORMULATION EVALUATION REPORT VOLUME 3 APPENDICES I AND J U. S.ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, ST. LOUIS CORPS OF ENGINEERS ST. LOUIS. MISSOURI u ■a y* LOCKS AND DAM NO. 26 (REPLACEMENT) UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN MISSISSIPPI RIVER - ALTON, ILLINOIS DESIGN MEMORANDUM NO. 11 FORMULATION EVALUATION REPORT VOLUME III APPENDIX I . . . . RATE ANALYSIS APPENDIX J . . . . TRANSPORTATION COST ANALYSIS APPENDIX I RATE ANALYSIS APPENDIX I A. Introduction B. Sampling Procedure C. Donley Report D. Discussion of Rate Analysis E. Rail Rate Validation, Tennessee Valley Authority F. Rate Changes Effecting Rate Differentials APPENDIX I RATE ANALYSIS A. Introduction 1. Public Law 89-670 states: "The primary direct navi- gation benefits of a water resource project are defined as the product of the savings to shippers using the waterway and the estimated traffic that would use the waterways." This position is reiterated in the Principles and Standards of 1973. 2. To calculate these benefits, rates for various modes for a sample of 231 movements of the 1972 traffic through Locks and Dam 26 were obtained from Charles Donley and Asso- ciates. Rate analysis sheets and information relevant to this study are contained in this Appendix. 3. Following the rate analysis sheets provided by Charles Donley and Associates is a discussion of the final rate sheets and values used in benefit computations. Also included are the comments on the validity of the rail rates as checked by the Tennessee Valley Authority. B. Commodity Sample Procedure 1. A sample of commodities moving on the waterway was taken in 196U. Rates were established for each of the items contained in the sample. This sample served as baseline data for mathematical evaluations aimed at determining the sample for 1972 commodity movements. 2. The old sample was stratified by kj commodity types. The stratified data was evaluated using the mathematical pro- cedures specified in Chapter 5, "Sampling Techniques," W. G. Cochran, Wiley Publication, May 1959. The purpose of the analysis was to determine (l) how many items should be sam- pled from each commodity ^ (2) how many total samples should be taken. The objective was to obtain a sample mean which would have a smaller standard deviation than that obtained in the first sample. The procedure of Chapter 5 results in identifi- cation of a sample size (by commodity) which should minimize the standard deviation for each commodity. This would result App-I-l in a minimal standard deviation for the entire sample. The "idealized" sample thus obtained was evaluated to determine the "knee" of the curve resulting from cross-plotting sample variance and sample size. The result was a recommended sam- ple of 200 items for the new sample. 3. Actual choice of particular movements for inclusion in the new sample utilized the following decision values. Commodities were to "be aggregated into nine classes from forty-seven. The nine classes are displayed in Table VI-B-1. The sample must reflect the origin-destination (O-D) actually experienced by the aggregated commodities. If more than one 0-D occurred for a particular com- modity class (grain for example) the commodity sample would be assigned to the 0-D matrix based on the distribution of actual commodity shipments among the different O-Ds. Actual selection would be at random within a particu- lar commodity 0-D given the following conditions. The entire range of shipments (tonnage) must be represented in the sam- ple. Secondly, the sample tonnage must be evenly spaced throughout the range of actual tonnage shipped. In effect, a sample of one small tonnage shipment and ten large tonnage shipments within a particular commodity 0-D is unacceptable (example only). The decision rules resulted in an increase from 200 to 231 items for the new sample. App-I-2 C. DONLEY REPORT WITH ATTACHMENT VOLUME I TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 . FORMAT OF REPORT 1 II. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 1 ill. SCOPE OF STUDY 2 IV. PROCEDURES FOLLOWED IN THE STUDY 3 v. JUDGMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS 5 COMMERCIAL JUDGMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS 6 General in Nature 6 On Specific Commodities 6 Grain Coal Petroleum Salt Phosphate Rock and Superphosphate Industrial Chemicals 6 7 7 7 8 8 RATE AND TRAFFIC JUDGMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS 8 Grain Coal and Lignite Petroleum Products Industrial Chemicals Other Commodities Selection of Alternative Modes Construction of Rates Level of Rates Utilized Contract Rates 9 10 11 12 12 12 13 13 ]k VI. CALCULATION OF TON-MILE EARNINGS 14 VII . BACK-HAUL COSTS 17 VII 1. COST OF EQUIPMENT 18 IX. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMODITY MOVEMENTS STUDY 19 Index of Commodity Movements Rate Analysis Sheets as found in Volume II Supplemental Index of Commodity Movements Rate Analysis Sheets as found in Volume II FORMAT OF REPORT This report consists of two volumes, Volume I, "BASIC REPORT", and Volume II, "IMDIViDUAL COMMODITIES FREIGHT RATE ANALYSES". The real substance, facts, and statistical data are found in Volume II which embraces 231 individual commodity sheets and 39 supplemental Individual commodity sheets, the latter discussed in more detail in Section IX. The sheets identify commodity movements that parsed through Locks No. 26 on the Mississippi River at Alton, Illinois during 1972 and include all underlying details of the movements, such as the origin, destination, total tonnage, river and rail mileages, and off-river origin and/or destlonatlon (where appropriate). Each Individual commodity sheet also includes specifically stated actual or estimated water, rail, pipeline and/or truck rates, and terminal charges (where appropriate), plus the totals where two or more rate or cost factors are Involved. Included also on each page are pertinent remarks concerning any extraordinary characteristics of the movement and of the rates used and tariff references, Including the name of the carrier and/or publishing agency, and the regulatory agency Identification number. Volume I Is a narrative explanation of the purpose of the study, Its scope and methodology, the principles followed, and judg- ments exercised. Also explained are the methods of data collection, standards relied upon, and definitions supporting judgments or assumptions. The "Index of Commodity Movements" found on the concluding pages of Volume I is Intended to serve as a guide to the orderly ar- rangement of Individual commodity sheets in Volume II, and shows the page number In Volume II where the facts or details of each movement can be found. Any page references in the narrative, Volume I, are to pages in Volume I I . It OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY As the report title implies, the study is a detailed origin- destination rate analysis of commodity movements that passed through Locks No. 26 on the Mississippi River at Alton, Illinois. The 231 movements selected by the Contracting Officer were among the many Inland waterways movements that were locked through Locks No. 26 during 1972. The basic objective of the study Is to provide transportation rate data on a sampling of 1S72 movements for use In the economic evaluation of replacement of a navigation structure on the Mississippi River, specifically Locks and Dam No. 26. - 1 - App-I- 3 It fs obvious that a specific study of every movement through Locks No. 26 would neither be practicable nor feasible. The Contracting Officer, therefore, selected the 231 movements according to his sampling techniques. The Contracting Officer furnished a listing of the 231 movements and provided relevant data needed to progress the study. For the majority of the movements, the commodity identifica- tion was adequate. For other movements, it was necessary during the field studies for us to probe much deeper for actual commodity identi- fication so that correct freight rates could be determined. Represen- tative of commodities in this category were Industrial Chemicals, Non- Metallic Minerals and Iron and Steel Products. In addition to the line haul rates, the contract called for all transfer and switching rates or charges applicable to loading and unloading of commodities at origin, destination and interchange points, for the prevailing barge or water movement and for the alternative transportation modes, including barge, rail, pipeline and truck. An exception was made in connection with the analysis of grain movements due to the obvious multiplicity of small country grain storage facil- ities from which the railroads and riverside elevators receive the grain since it Is uneconomical to define all lines of feeder haul and corresponding proportional rates. Hi SCOPE OF STUDY By noting the Index of Commodity Movements and/or the indi- vidual commodity sheets that are found in Volume II, the movements selected for study by the Contracting Officer include many commodities which moved in volume quantities, ranging from 536 tons annually ?n the case of Castings and Forglngs from South Chicago, Illinois to Granite City, Illinois (Page 170 to **53,967 tons annually in the case of Inedible Molasses from Ste. Genevieve, Missouri to Calumet Harbor, Illinois (Page 223). It can be observed also that the movements selec- ted for the study involved relatively short, medium and long-haul barge or river traffic. The movements originated at or were destined to ports or terminals on the Upper and Lower Mississippi River, the Illinois River, the Ohio River, the Missouri River, the Tennessee River, the Green River and the Cumberland River and on the Intercoastal Waterway and the Gulf of Mexico. It seems pertinent to mention that this particular study of commodity movements which passed through Locks No. 26 during 1972 is a smaller version of a similar study made In 1967-1968 on commodity movements that passed through Locks No. 26 during 196*+. The earlier study covered 625 commodities falling into ^8 commodity groups. By comparison this current study, as can be noted App-I-4 In the Index of Commodity Movements, covered 231 commodities in kk groups. Although a specific check was not made, a number of the indi- vidual commodity movements undoubtedly will be found in both studies. Our contracts with the Corps of Engineers covering these studies gave us the responsibility of determining the transportation costs of the barge or water movement as well as the transportation costs for movement via alternate modes of transportation. Our contract for this study did not Include the measurement or determination of the cost advantage or disadvantage of movement via alternate routes as compared with movement via barge. Accountably, there Is a marked similarity in the objectives, format, scope, and methodology of the two studies and reports. IV PROCEDURES FOLLOWED IN THE STUDY Following initial agreements with the Contracting Officer, our first step was to draw, from the listing, necessary data for the 231 commodity movement rate analysis work sheets. Collation of these sheets revealed the most significant commodity groups and dictated to a large extent the industries and geographic areas which should be the object of the Initial field studies. Contemporaneously, we submitted to the Contracting Officer for his approval prototype rate analysis sheets containing all necessary data entries, and upon approval of this sheet were able to proceed with the preparation of the 231 work sheets and individual commodity sheets as found in Volume II. It was readily apparent that the greatest number of commodity movements would be in the Grain, Petroleum, and Coal areas and the field work in these basic commodities was begun immediately. Contacts were made as follows: 1. As to Coal, at Chicago and in the Minneapol is-St . Paul area where most of the coal moved through Locks No. 26, is consumed by electric power generating stations; and at St, Louis, Huntington, and Pittsburgh, where the mining and the actual marketing of Coal is controlled. 2. As to Petroleum Products, in the Minneapol is-St. Paul area, at Chicago and at points in Texas where most of the use and production Is controlled. 3. As to Grain, at Minneapol is-St. Paul, Chicago and St. Louis and at other points in Illinois where most - 3 - App-I-5 decisions are made. k. With regulated barge lines, having headquarters at Pittsburgh, Jeffersonvi lie, St. Louis, and Chicago. 5. At river terminal transfer facilities along the waterways. 6. With pipeline companies based primarily In Texas and Oklahoma. We were able to make use of carefully selected skilled trans- portation specialists who possess intimate knowledge of the marketing, transportation and handling aspects of the major commodity groups (Grain, Coal, Petroleum Products, and Chemicals) as well as specialists asso- ciated with the other commodities or commodity groups. The data from these specialists was verified on a "spot" basis to insure accuracy. If any particular area of information were to be termed the most difficult to obtain, it would be the identification of contract or exempt barge rates in many cases, and In fewer cases, the identifi- cation of particular commodities. We believe a sufficient number of contacts or inquiries were made so as to eliminate any insignificant inconsistencies. For many commodity movements, In fact In some Instances for entire commodity groups, alternate rates via rail routes had to be con- structed since useable and realistic rates are not published in tariffs. While construction of rates can be difficult and time-consuming, we believe that the problems were overcome. In every case where un- real Istlcal ly high rates were encountered, we were able to construct lower rates based on existing or published rates or scale of rates for movement of any particular commodity within reasonably the same terri- torial range. It must be recognized that freight rates cannot be con- structed or projected with an absolute guarantee of accuracy. By applying our expertise and knowledge as to how rates are constructed by use of recognized and acceptable formulas and relationships, we believe the constructed rates will stand any reasonable test. While our projected rail rate levels may be challenged or questions raised as to why lower rail rates were not projected for movements via alternate routes Including all-rail, rail-barge, or rail- barge-rail routes, the rates were projected on or related to published tariff rates in effect at the time the study began on the same commod- ities within the same rate-making territories. Indeed, we found it strange that the railroads had not published rates that were lower and more competitive with rates for barge movements on many of the commodities, regardless of whether the barge rates were published or contracted for. For this reason, we App-I- believe any challenges of the projected or constructed rates that would apply absent barge competition, I.e., if Locks No. 26 were to pass out of existence, would be speculative and not based on sound rate-making principles or on current rate-making practices. Without water or barge competition, there would be little reason or incentive for the railroads to publish rates lower than those we have constructed in order to gain a particular segment of traffic when the railroads undoubtedly would receive that traffic under present or our constructed rates. This follows the historical pattern, more prevalent in recent years, wherein the railroads have shown consider- able reluctance to publish reduced rates where no compelling element of competition exists. Generally, when there Is a strong desire to meet water competition, the railroads have established, and the Interstate Commerce Commission has allowed, rail rates to become effective which reflect 110% of the total barge cost including line-haul rates and all loading, unloading and other accessorial or incidental charges. JUDGMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS In studying a large block of waterways commerce, and when comparing the costs thereof with costs of alternate modes of transpor- tation, certain judgments and assumptions Inevitably must be made. One very broad assumption was Initially agreed upon, namely, that the same origins and destinations were to be used in calculating the costs via the alternative modes of transportation. To have digressed Into a study of alternate origins or destinations would have required that the study be an economic exercise of Impossible complexity and probably beyond the needs of Contracting Officer, time considered. Notwithstand- ing the foregoing, it was possible at times to establish or determine with some degree of certainty the off-river origin or destination of a commodity movement. When this was done, the movement was rated from or to the off-river origin or destination. A number of other narrower and more technical judgments and assumptions had to be made. In the interest of simplicity, we have cataloged these Into two groups: (1) those involving commercial judgments or assumptions, and (2) those Involving the rate and traffic judgments and assumptions. It is difficult to place these judgments and assumptions in any particular order of significance; they are listed hereinafter by the two groupings above described: App-I- 7 COMMERCIAL JUDGMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS A. V/hen barges are loaded at origin and or unloaded at destination on the industrial properties where the commodities orig- inate or terminate, no cost was assigned to the loading or unloading of barges on the grounds that this cost would be on the average no more nor less than the cost for loading or unloading the same commodity to or from railroad cars or trucks. This also applies to transfers of liquid commodities between barges and pipelines. B. With the exception of grain, the majority of the movements studied did in fact originate, or can logically be assumed to have orig- inated, at or adjacent to the point of loading on barge. Similarly, the great majority of movements, including grain, did In fact terminate, or are assumed to have terminated, at the destination dock. We were able in most cases to determine by Identification of the receiver or receiving point whether or not the movements actually came to rest for all practical purposes at or adjacent to the destination dock. By the same means, we were able to Identify movements that obviously originated and/or terminated at an Inland point some distance from the rivers. We have, therefore, assumed that unless noted otherwise on an individual commodity sheet, or otherwise referred to in the narrative, the actual origin and destination of the movement was the point at which the barge movement originated and terminated. C. Elaborating further on "B M above, not every water move- ment studied was based on actual origin and final destination at the waterside. This factor is explained hereinafter by commodities or commodity groups. (1) GRAIN Obviously little grain is grown adjacent to grain elevators on the river banks. Land transportation Is mandatory from the Inland growing areas. To a lesser extent, the same Is true of grain moved by rail from the collecting elevators. We have developed during our field contacts that the preponderance of the grain moved by river through Locks No. 26 Is trans- ported from the farms to the river terminal via truck, exempt from regulation. Transportation costs from farm to elevator, frequently referred to as "gathering" costs, were omitted from consideration In this study because the cost would be the same or nearly so whether or not the movement from the elevator was by barge or rail. Little grain moves to elevators located more than 25 miles from the growing area. Transportation costs for hauls of this distance would not vary significantly whether the actual distance of movement was 20, 25 or 30 miles. Finally, these incidental gathering costs are often borne by the purchaser of the grain. In other words, the grain is bought on a fully delivered basis. - 6 - App-I-8 On the other hand, the termination points of the grain are predominately the final destinations from a standpoint of transportation costs. In most cases, the destinations are grain elevators from which the grain is distributed locally, exported via deep-water vessels, or moved to closely adjacent flour or milling facilities. In other words, the identity of the grain Is lost once it is taken out of the transportation vehicle and placed Into the terminal elevator faci 1 ity. (2) COAL Coal movements studied represent a mixture of movements originating from river mines (Pages 60, 65 and 67) and movements originating at Inland mines where rati movement is necessary to reach the transloadfng facility on the rivers (Pages 56, 63, and 66). In each case where the movement originated at an inland mine, the rail- road rate to the river is shown. Where the dumping charge Is not Included in the rate, It Is separately stated on the Individual commodity. The greatest portion of the coal is terminated at electric power stations located on the waterways where it is directly consumed. No cost Is assigned to off-loading the barges since the power company would incur a similar offsetting cost had the coal moved by rail. (3) PETROLEUM Petroleum must be treated in a similar fashion. For example, gasoline is seldom consumed at the river bank. It must be distributed primarily by truck In local delivery systems. Local petroleum terminals no matter where they are located distribute gasoline by peddle-type tank vehicles. Since the cost of local distri- bution would be incurred no matter how the gasoline arrived at the terminal, rail or water, no costs beyond the storage terminals are Included In the study. Even If an attempt were made to Include them, the complexity of gasoline distribution system would frustrate any rational cost assignment. Fuel oils follow the same patterns and, although some fuel oils might be consumed at waterside by large industries, the majority of the tonnage is for heating purposes and moves In petroleum company tank truck distribution systems in a fashion similar to gasoline. In the case of petroleum asphalt, all of which originates at river bank refineries, the destinations are the storage tanks at the river desti- nations with only local distribution beyond. The local distribution cost would be Incurred whether the asphalt moved to the storage tanks by water or by rail. The same Is true of the other miscellaneous petroleum products. (4) SALT This Is Ice control salt and for transpor- tation purposes must be considered to terminate at the destination river terminal. At the destination terminal the material loses its identity because It is trucked, often in state or municipal highway - 7 - App-I- 9 department vehicles, to numerous stock-piles or storage facilities for use in season. It is significant to note that the railroads publish low multiple car incentive rates from the salt origins to consuming destinations or municipalities, obviously to meet water competition. Since the multiple car rail movements are terminated at some large storage facility from which the salt would be trucked to point of ultimate use, any ex-river transportation costs would be offset by the additional costs incurred on rail movements. (5) PHOSPHATE ROCK AND SUPERPHOSPHATE — Most of the rock originates In the pebble district in the Bartow, Florida area. All of the river-oriented movements are transported by rail to the Port of Tampa, Florida. At Tampa, the material is loaded into Integrated tows that move through to ultimate river destinations. Our studies include the rail rates to Tampa and the through barge rates to terminals on the inland waterways. At destination terminals, the phosphate rock moves into fertilizer factories and loses its identity. The super- phosphate moves to river terminal distribution points to be further distributed to farms as fertilizer, usually in private motor carrier equipment. (6) INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS It is the general practice In the chemical industry to inventory some of its products at terminals located various distances from their production facilities. This eliminates the building of additional storage tanks at the production units, provides faster delivery service to customers, and allows the company to take maximum advantage of low cost water transportation. Public terminals are most frequently utilized because of their diver- sity of personnel and operations as well as cost advantages. The integrity of the chemicals are maintained by using tanks similar to the tanks that are constructed at the producing plants, I.e., special linings, alloys, pressure tanks, etc. The transfer of liquid cargoes between barges and terminals presents little difficulty, either with respect to speed or volume of transfer. Expertly trained personnel are required for load- ing and discharging many of the liquid chemical products because they are In many cases, corrosive, flammable, toxic, poisonous or moved at elevated or reduced temperatures. Here, again, the costs of loading and unloading barges should not be significantly different, whether higher or lower than the costs Incurred on rail movements. RATE AND TRAFFIC JUDGMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS Explanations of judgments and assumptions In the rate and traffic area are also difficult to present In any order of significance. However, the preferable format appears to be to discuss first rate and traffic matters bearing upon the largest volume movements, followed by comments on broad and basic rate factors such as contract barge rates, and general assumptions having to do with construction of rates where no rates are published. - 3 - App-I- 10 The most significant volume movements studied were, In order, grain, coal, petroleum products, and chemicals. (A) Grain Initially recognized In the contract was the problem of obtaining realistic freight rates and costs for movement of grain on the rivers and from the farms to the river terminals. Personal contacts were established with several of the large grain traders and with a traffic consultant to the grain Industry. Few rates are actually obtained from these sources because of the time and expense that would be incurred in recovering information two or three years old. Most of the rate information on the grain move- ments was, therefore, obtained from the several barge lines that con- centrate on grain transportation as well as other dry bulk barge lines. The rates obtained from these sources on any one movement were averaged and the "average" rate was used in the study to denote the cost of barge movement. Most of our sources Indicate that the grain that moved In 1972 moved under long term contract rates or single shipment quotations whether higher or lower than the published rates prevailing at that time. In addition to the treatment of the "gathering" costs discussed previously, other assumptions or judgments had to be made in connection with the transportation cost study for the grain movements. First, our contacts revealed that the cost of transferring the grain from the elevators to barge was approximately Zi;t per bushel. The cost of transferring to a rail car Is slightly higher. This, we were told, was due primarily to the freouent Interruptions In the loading cycle as the rail cars were shifted in and out of the loading position. Nevertheless, we chose to omit these costs (gathering, elevating, trans- ferring or loading) from the study In the case of both rail and barge movements. In making our calculations, we were aware that the gather- ing cost of trucking to rail elevators Is usually lower on the average than the cost to river elevators (because of shorter average distance). However, In the ultimate trading, a realistic view would be that this Is not a real cost advantage that should accrue to rail movements out- bound from the elevator. The higher cost of trucking the greater aver- age distances to river terminals is usually offset, or more than offset, by the higher price paid for grain at a river terminal elevator versus an Inland rail country elevator. This Is caused by the fact that with barge rates generally being lower than rail rates for like movements, the grain buyer at the river terminal elevator can afford to pay the farmer or grower more for the grain than can the trader at the rail country elevator. For existing and constructed rates on the grain move- ments, we utilized the latest of concepts in rail rate making, taking Into consideration single car rates, multiple car rates and unit train App-I-U rates, all subject to varying minimum weights per car and per shipment. The result was that the multiple car rates were used more frequently and were subject to aggregates ranging from 275 net tons per shipment to 23,125 net tons in not more than 5 movements. (B) Coal and Lignite — Under the heading commercial judg- ments and assumptions, we have previously described the physical dif- ferences between "river" mines and "rail" mines and see no need to treat the matter further. Fourteen movements of coal were studied (Pages 5^ through 67), the majority of which terminated at electric power stations on the rivers. Almost all of the barge movements were under contract rates which were obtained primarily from barge lines, who In some Instances allowed us to view the actual contracts for transportation. This Is highly confidential trade Information and should under no circumstances be disclosed to outsiders. As with grain, we obtained the contract rates from more than one source on any particular movement. These were averaged and the "average" rate used in the individual studies. The rates for alternate movement via railroad, should Locks No. 26 not be available, are premised on several bases: (1) Where necessary, rates on the largest movements were projected on the basis of rail annual volume coal rates existing today in rail tariffs, but not applying between the actual origins and destinations of the movements under study. For example, annual volume rates apply today from mines in Belleville (Illinois) District and from the Western Kentucky Group to various Wisconsin and Minnesota points such as Eau Claire, Wisconsin Rapids, Rhinelander, Molsinee, Rothschild and Rochester, to name a few. The annual volume requirements range from 25,000 N.T. at Madison, Wisconsin to 125,000 NT, at Nekoosa, Wisconsin. A thorough analysis of these rates Indicated that they averaged about 6.8% of the contemporaneous First Class railroad rates. We used the same 6.8% of the First Class rate In constructing rates between the origins and destinations In the study on the larger volume movements. This Is so stated on the individual commodity sheets. Representative rate construction can be found on Pages 55, 60, and 65. (2) On smaller movements, we found multiple car rates published In the tariffs between the actual origins and destinations of the movements under study or used the existing multiple car rates for constructing other rail rates. We are convinced that these multi- ple car rates based on 2,500 and 3,000 tons per shipment are probably as low as could be expected on these smaller volumes. - 10 - App-I-12 (3) On the very small movements, we have used the existing single car rail races in the belief that the railroads would be unlikely to publish lower rates. For each movement where annual volume rates were project- ed, we included, for information only, the higher existing single car rate If for no other reason than to present a "range" between the con- structed rates that in our judgment could be obtained were river trans- portation not available, and the actual currently published single car rates which would have to be used if the coal moved by rail before any multiple car or annual volume rates could be published. (C) Petroleum Products — Our contacts with the petroleum industry established that some of the petroleum product movements under study actually originated at refineries located on the waterways. Other commodities were movements that were susceptible to pipeline transportation and moved from interior refineries to river transfer facilities. Movements of this nature are noted on the individual commodity sheets (Pages 76, 92, and 116, for example). Through an understanding with the Contracting Officer, no alternative pipeline rates were constructed as was done in the earlier study. This caused us to develop during the course of the study costs of alternative rail and/or truck transportation. Railroad tank car rates are widely published on recognized scales for all sizes of tank cars, although all of our projections were made on the assump- tion that the larger (20,000 or 30,000 gallon) tank cars would be used. Gasol ine — - All gasoline Is transported under contract barge rates or In private barge equipment. Rates on any one movement were obtained from several sources and were "averaged". These contract barge rates were obtained on a first-hand basis and, again, are highly confidential. For each movement of gasoline, we took the Individual circumstances into consideration. For example, there were many move- ments requiring an initial pipeline move to the river origin. In these cases published pipeline tariff rates were used. By-and-large, the alternative modes used were pipeline and rail, mainly because most of the hauls were so long that tank truck rates were prohibitively high. Tank truck rates were used, however, on the short-haul movements (Page 70). Residual Fuel Oil — - Residual fuel oil Is rarely handled in pipelines because it tends to clog the lines and Its A.P.I, gravity Is so low that the cost for moving It through pipelines would be excessive. In fact, pipeline tariffs contain outright prohibitions against fuel oil with a few exceptions (Pages 127 and 136). Petroleum Asphalt This commodity originates at river refineries and terminates almost exclusively at river terminals with - 11 - App-I-13 local distribution beyond by truck. Multiple car rates were used to construct transportation costs via alternative modes. Al iphatlc Naptha This is a high-purity product and cannot be transported in pipelines due to fear of contamination. This product is used in the plastics industry and is distributed from river terminals locally by truck. The alternative mode, because of the long average haul, is always rail. (D) Industrial Chemicals The category of industrial chemicals gave us the greatest problems as it fell upon us to estab- lish the specific identity of the commodities for rating purposes. The specific commodity descriptions were developed through contacts with manufacturers at various origins or with receivers at destinations. We found commodities In this category: anhydrous ammonia, caustic soda (or sodium hydroxide), cyanide, and glycols. Once the Identifications were established, we were able to ascertain existing rates or, in lieu thereof, to construct rates for these specific commodities. Here again, rates on the liquid chemicals were predicated upon the use of the larger tank cars. (E) Other Commodities No particular problems were encoun- tered in rating the remaining commodity movements, other than to estab- lish the specific identification of a few of them. For example, the generic description of non-metallic minerals as given to us by the Contracting Officer turned out to be fluorspar (Page 212). Steel mill products were found to be Iron and steel bars and plate. Similarly, the movement described as iron and steel products by the Contracting Officer was slabs or breakdowns and was rated accordingly. (F) Selection of Alternative Modes Some judgment was required in selecting the alternative modes of transportation where the most desirable and/or lowest cost mode was not readily apparent. Where there was any doubt as to the lowest cost or more desirable mode, we determined costs via alternate modes by utilizing published rail and truck rates. We reasoned this selection with our knowledge as to whether or not the use of one or the other mode would be most feasible. For example, even If published rates might be lower for some unknown reason, large volume movement by truck Is seldom feasible for distances exceeding a 250 to 300 miles. Similarly, very short movements by rail are ordinarily not feasible unless huge ton- nages are Involved and adequate rail trackage Is available at both ends of the movement. - 12 APP-I-14 (G) Construction of Rates Most of the "constructed" alternate rates used in the study were rail rates. We constructed rates only where no rates were published or where, In our judgment, the published rates were unreal i stlcal ly high. \J In searching for rates on some commodities, we found that there were no rail rates pub- lished for similar movements of the same commodity in the same rate- making territory as there had been no rail movement nor any real pros- pect of movement. On most commodities, however, there did exist a rate or rates on a like rail movement which could be used as a basis in constructing rates. We followed the rationale that we would endeavor to locate such a published rate or scale of rates on the commodity being studied with a particular effort to find published rates in the same geographical territory. It was possible in most cases to find rates that could be used as a basic yardstick. When the rates were found in what is known as a scale (rates that progress according to distance), we applied the appropriate rail distance for the alternate movement. Where no rate scales could be found, we located movements of the commodity for the same or similar distance as was required. In all cases, we used the same or a greater minimum weight or car require- ment in constructing rates. In this way we believe we have constructed the lowest reasonable rates that the railroads would be willing to publ ish. (H) Level of Rates Utilized By agreement with the Contracting Officer all published rates, terminal charges and contract rates used in connection with this study were calculated at levels in effect on January 1975 when most of our field work was taking place or contacts were being made with industries or carriers. In connection with rail rates specifically, these were at the Ex Parte No. 305-A level which became effective June 20, 197^ and remained in effect until April 27, 1975 when the railroads were authorized a 7% increase in most commodities. \J Without a lengthy dissertation on the subject — ■ persons familiar with rates are aware of the fact that railroad rates are "published" on any commodity moving between any two points in the United States. These rates are known as Class rates and are the maximum basis of rates published by the railroads. Seldom do they apply on estab- lished movement of commodities In any volume. We have disregarded them completely in the study, although in numerous cases In proj- ecting rates we have utilized relationships to the First Class or Class 100 rate as a convenient measuring stick. The conve- nience is found in the fact that all class rates are related to established distances and, therefore, provide a useable standard. - 13 - App-I- 15 (I) Contrect Rat es Contract barge rates on the rivers vary widely. There are cases where contract rates are higher for shorter waterway distances than for movements of the same commodity over the same ranges of waterways for greater distances. Contract rates for movements of a given distance on one river can be higher or lower than for movements of the same distance on another river or on different reaches of the same river. Contract rates are just what the name implies. They are charges agreed upon between the purchaser of transportation and the carrier. The measure of these agreed charges can turn on a number of economic factors. Many are long term contracts. Others are negotiated on a single shipment basis or short run basis. Some of the lower con- tract rates may cover a huge volume of movements over a two or three year period (Coal, Petroleum). Depending upon the contract river market at the time the contract was made, the rates can be either high or low. In other words, if the contract is drawn when the carrier has idle equipment the price tends to be on the low side, the opposite is true if carrier equipment Is in short supply. Some shippers or receivers expect or demand a higher degree of performance than required by other shippers or receivers similarly situated and are assessed and/or are willing to pay a higher price. In summary, the basis for contract rates involves intan- gibles, often difficult to determine, particularly when the rates are low and provide a given shipper or receiver with some advantage over another. The reluctance of some parties to reveal these contract rates is understandable. We believe we have determined the contract rates applicable to the various movements with a high degree of accuracy. Large steel, coal, and petroleum companies own and operate, frequently under affiliated companies, towboats and barges. The transportation is performed essentially under contract rates, the contract being one between the parent and Its affiliate. These pri- vate movements are essentially nothing but a substitute for contract carriage. VI CALCULATION OF TOM-MILE EARNINGS During the course of the study, carrier revenues or earnings in cents per ton-mile were calculated based on the existing or con- structed rail rates and on the barge rates used for the movements under study. The rail ton-mil e earnings were then compared with the average ton-mile earnings reported by rail territory In the 1972 - ]k - App-i-16 2/ Carload Waybill Statistics— . A similar comparison was not possible In connection with barge rates since, to the best of our knowledge, no earnings statistics are complied or publicized for either exempt or non-exempt commodity movements by barge. The purpose of these calculations and comparisons was to add credibility to the rail and barge rates used in the study by isolating or Identifying rates that appear to be excessively high or low when compared with average ton-mile earnings or when measured against earnings on other movements of the same commodity. The ton-mile earnings on all rail movements of corn under study averaged 1.1$ per ton-mile whereas the 1972 Carload Waybill Statistics reported the ton-mile earnings for all sampled movements to be 1.2$ per ton-mfle which when increased by the various Ex Parte rail rate increases that occurred during 1973 and 197*+ amounts to 1.5c per ton-mile. Thus, the average earnings of 1.1$ per ton-mile as calculated from the existing or constructed rail rates (January 1975 level) on the 25 movements of corn compare favorably to the average earnings of 1.5$ per ton-mile (increased to January 1975 level) as reported to the Department of Transportation, adding a degree of realism and credence to the rail rate levels. The ton-mile earnings calculated from the rail rates used in this study were also compared with the earnings reported in the 1972 Carload Waybill Statistics for movements from and to the various rail rate-making territories. The following five movements of oats are used to Illustrate the value of a comparison of this type: Movement St. Paul to Vicksburg Savage to Guntersville " to Baton Rouge " to Vicksburg " to Shawneetown ^Increased to 1974 levels by applying Ex Parte increases. The 25 movements of corn also provide another good Illustra- tion of the value of these calculations. By listing the movements In order of ascending mileage as we have done in Table No. 1 on Page 16, the ton-mile earnings resulting from the existing or constructed rail Earni ngs Earnings Ton-M He Ton -Mile Reported Rai lroad on Rates by DOT MI leaqe in Study 1972 1974* 1033 1.3$ 1.5$ 1.9$ 1014 1.2$ 1.5$ 1.9$ 1178 1.1$ 1.5$ 1.9$ 1033 1.30 1.5$ 1.9$ 616 2.1$ 1.6$ 2.0$ 2/ Statement TD-1 , Year 1973, Office of Economics Federal Railroad Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation - 15 - App-I-17 TABLE NO. EARNINGS RESULTING FROM EXISTING OR CONSTRUCTED RAIL & BARGE RATES ON 25 MOVEMENTS OF CORN (Earnings in cents per ton-mile) RAIL BARGE MILEAGE EARNINGS 569 2.0 653 1.4 685 .9 703 1.4 745 1.3 745 1.4 763 1.0 796 .9 798 .9 798 .9 820 .9 820 .9 820 ,9 820 .9 852 1.3 852 1.3 852 1.3 857 1.6 860 1,2 878 1.3 1178 1.1 1178 1.1 1210 1.1 1210 1.1 1210 1.1 MILEAGE EARNINGS 744 .5 889 .5 903 .4 1003 .4 1014 .4 1068 .3 1069 .4 1101 .4 1109 .4 1200 .4 1220 .3 1234 .3 1235 .3 1243 .3 1282 .4 1299 .4 1300 .4 1300 .3 1345 .3 1352 .4 1589 .3 1701 .3 1702 .3 1716 .3 1723 .3 - 16 - App-I-18 rates show positive evidence of falling, with a few relatively minor departures, into the pattern expected, i.e., that ton-mile earnings decline as the length of haul increases. In much the same manner, the ton-mile earnings derived from the barge rates used in connection with the 25 movements of corn also fall into a predictable pattern, even though the barge rates were obtained from several separate and distinct sources. This pattern can be noted also in Table No. 1 wherein the ton-mile earnings on the barge movements are listed in ascending order of mileage. With several Insignificant exceptions, the earnings decline as the length of haul Increases. Similar comparisons of the ton-mile earnings produced by rates on other commodities were made and substantially established that rates used In this study, rail and/or barge, are realistically based. VII BACK-HAUL COSTS No consideration was given to the cost of back-hauling or returning empty transportation vehicles from the destination or point of unloading to the point of initial origin or loading. The cost, whether barge or rail equipment Is Involved, Is normally a factor con- sidered In the pricing or rate-making function and not a factor of direct concern to the transportation user. Little or no industry-wide information Is available Indicat- ing the extent to which barges are returned empty or the ratios of empty miles to loaded miles. It Is realized that barges, on occasion, are returned empty to Initial point of origin. In fact, liquid bulk or tank barges used in transporting petroleum products and chemicals may move one empty mile for every loaded mile, particularly where specially lined or pressurized barges are required for transportation. Actually the experience varies widely by carrier, by river or by segment of any one river, and by season. For example, the demand for barge equipment may be so great during heavy grain shipping seasons that the barges will be returned empty so as to have them Immediately available for subsequent grain shipments. During slow periods, the barges wi'l be held waiting a return revenue load. One barge line has disclosed the information that there is a good balance of loaded movements to and from points on the Illinois River and that few of its barges move empty through Locks No. 26 in either direction. - 17 - App-I- 19 3/ On the other hand, railroad cost statistics- report ratios of empty to loaded car miles by type of railroad equipment and by territory. For purposes of this study we are showing below the ratios of empty to loaded car miles for Regions IV and V, the two regions in which most origins and/or destinations of the commodity movements under study are found. Region IV is the Southern region, Region V is the Western District excluding Mountain Pacific and Trans-Territory. Ti'.e ratios are as follows: Region IV Region V Type of Car Ratio Ratio Box-General Service, unequipped .76 .65 and equipped Hopper, Open-General Service .88 1.04 Hopper, Open-Special Service .98 1.02 Hopper, Covered 1.02 1.00 Tank Car 1.08 1.10 VIII COST OF EQUIPMENT The cost of transportation equipment, whether acquired through outright purchase or under lease arrangements, was not taken into con- sideration in this study. To have done otherwise would have expanded the study by substantial proportions. It Is true that there is a cost to be reckoned with by the transport user. Barge and railroad equipment is not Inexpensive. More often than not, however, our experience Indicates that the action by the transport user in providing the transportation vehicle Is a factor to be considered In rate-making, i.e., lower rates are published when the transport user furnishes the vehicle at its expense than when the vehicle is furnished by the carrier. This applies to barge rates and to single-car, multiple-car or unit train rail rates. A related cost element that was also omitted from this study was the mileage allowances paid by the railroads for cars furnished by the user. These allowances vary by type of car and on occasion, by railroad. In addition, allowances paid on tank cars vary by the age and the value of the car. The allowances paid by a few railroads are on a loaded and empty-mile basis whereas most railroads pay allowances on a loaded-mile basis only. The result is often the same since the per-mile allowance when paid on loaded and empty miles Is generally one-half the per mile allowance when paid only on Icaded-mlles. y Statement No. ICI-72, Rail Carload Cost Scales, 1972 Bureau of Accounts, Interstate Commerce Commission. - 18 - App-I- 20 The allowances currently being paid for the type of cars most frequently involved in the commodity movements under study are as fol lows : Type of Car Cents per Loaded Mile— Tank Car 9.04 to \3.kk* Covered Hopper 13.0 Open Hopper 7.5 Box Car 1 .7 *Based upon age and value of car. Several shippers who operate sizeable fleets of leased or owned railroad equipment have stated that the total mileage allowances paid on any one car generally are not great enough to offset acquisi- tion costs. The experience varies widely and, In fact, depends upon the extent to which a car Is utilized. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMODITY MOVEMENTS STUDY During the course of the study, the Contracting Officer expanded the study to include a supplemental transportation cost anal- ysis on 39 of the original 231 commodity movements. The movements selected had either origin or destination In the Southwest that would necessitate barge passage through the Vermillion Locks on the Inter- coastal Waterway In Louisiana and destination or origin In the Midwest requiring barge movement through Locks No. 26. These 39 supplemental commodity movements are, therefore, treated separately and are Identi- fied In the Supplemental Index of Commodity Movements in Volume I. The rate analysis sheets on these movements are found on the conclud- ing pages In Volume II, numbered SI, S2, etc. This supplemental study had the effect of developing all-rail and all-water transportation costs from river origins to river desti- nations as well as the development of transportation costs from and to the same origins and destinations via alternative rail-water or rail- water-rail routes that would circumvent, In one Instance, the Vermillion Locks and In the second Instance, both the Vermillion Locks and Locks No. 26. For purposes of this supplemental study, It was concluded that the barge movements would originate or terminate at Morgan City, La., when the Vermillion Locks were to be avoided and would originate or terminate at St. Louis when Locks No. 26 were to be avoided. hj Mileage Tariff 7-E, ICC H-64 - 19 - App-I- 21 The methods used in constructing rates on these supplemental movements (in the absence of reasonable existing rates) are the same as used in connection with the original 231 commodity movements. - 20 - App-I- 22 INDEX OF COMMODITY MOVEMENTS RATE ANALYSIS SHEETS INDEX OF COMMODITY MOVEMENTS LOCKS NO. 26 MISSISSIPPI RIVER PAGE RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS RIVER MILES CORN 1 2 3 4 5 Davenport, la. Havana, 111. Savage, Minn. Savage, Minn. Savage, Minn. Guntersvi 1 le, Ala. Guntersvi 1 1e, Ala. New Orleans, La. Destrehan, La. Baton Rouge, La. 1,5** 45,801 10,765 6,459 165,853 899 744 1723 1702 1589 6 7 8 9 10 Savage, Minn. Florence, 111. Naples, 111. Havana , 111. Pekin, 111. New Orleans, La. Baton Rouge, La. Baton Rouge, La. Baton Rouge, La. New Orleans, La. 30,446 61,461 4,255 94,198 22,327 1716 1003 1044 1069 1235 11 12 13 14 15 Pekin, 111. Pekin, 111. Pekin, 111. North Pekin, 111. Peoria, 111. Baton Rouge, La. West we go, La. Vlcksburg, Miss. Destrehan, La. Baton Rouge, La. 7,055 15,367 1,373 1,482 68,976 1101 1234 903 1220 1109 16 17 18 19 20 Peoria, 111. Peoria, 111. Spring Valley, 111. Spring Valley, 111. Ottawa, 111. Pascagoula, Miss. New Orleans, La. New Orleans, La. New Orleans, La. Destrehan, La. 3,071 35,413 16,232 22,378 100,560 1352 1243 1300 1300 1299 21 22 23 24 25 Morris, 111. Alton, 111. LaG range, Mo. Kingston, la. St. Paul, Minn. West we go, La. New Orleans, La. New Orleans, Oa. Westwego, La. Westwego, La. 13,001 21,028 6,099 2,942 12,224 1345 1068 1200 1282 1701 SOYBEANS 26 27 28 29 30 Florence, 111. Beards town, 111. Havana , 111. Pekin, 111. Kingston, la. New Orleans, La. Memphis, Tenn. New Orleans, La. Baton Rouge, La, Alliance, La. 1,381 11,263 2,393 2,852 13,591 1137 539 1202 1100 1320 31 32 Savage, Minn. Naples, 111. New Orleans, La. Pascagoula, Miss. 23,068 15,308 1723 1255 BARLEY AND RYE 33 3AGE RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS MILES 5AS0LINE 73 Hartford, 111, St. Paul , Minn. 17,345 643 74 Hartford, 111. Quincy, 111. 81 ,230 128 75 Hartford, 111. Cicero, 111. 186,148 341 76 St. Louis, Mo. Canton, Mo. 60,135 163 77 Hartford, 111. North Pekin, 111 . 252,702 179 73 St. Louis, Mo. LaGrange, Mo. 11,896 160 79 St. Louis, Mo. Albany, 111. 27,225 337 80 Ostrlca, La. North Pekin, 111. 37,908 1304 81 Norco, La. Black River, Wis. 17,426 1535 82 St. Louis, Mo. Bettendorf, la. 26,815 487 83 Hartford, ill. V/inona, Minn. 20,362 521 84 Beaumont, Tex. Bettendorf, la. 58,535 1473 85 Channahan, 111. St. Louis, Mo. 9,940 320 JET FUEL 86 Hartford, 111. St. Paul , Minn. 38,825 643 87 Atreco, Tex. Cicero, 111. 2,059 1700 KEROSENE 88 Violet, La. Black River, Wis. 7,593 1582 89 New Orleans, La. Black River, Wis. 1,841 1582 90 Norco, La. St. Paul, Minn. 7,983 1674 91 Norco, La. Black River, Wis. 3,432 1537 92 Mount Vernon, Ind. Cicero, 111. 5,347 689 93 Mount Vernon, Ind. Peoria, 111. 1,506 534 94 Beaumont, Tex, Bettendorf, la. 2,392 1473 95 Beaumont, Tex. St. Paul, Minn. 4,327 1823 96 Beaumont, Tex. Black River, Wis, 11,410 1679 97 Beaumont, Tex. Cicero, 111. 3,637 1521 ;as OIL. FUEL OIL 98 Hartford, 111. North Pekin, 111. 176,893 179 99 St. Louis, Mo. Albany, 111. 31,683 330 00 Hartford, 111. Quincy, 111. 32,580 128 101 Violet, La. Black River, Wis. 18,583 1582 102 New Orleans, La. Black River, Wis. 1,841 1562 103 Memphis, Tenn. Lyons, la. 4,763 738 104 St. Louis, Mo. Bettendorf, la. 7,208 307 05 St. Louis, Mo. Fulton, 111. 6,055 340 106 St. Louis, Mo. V/inona, Minn. 3,149 545 107 St. Louis, Mo. Burlington, la. 21,975 224 08 St. Louis, Mo. Kingston Mines, 111. 84,317 184 09 St. Louis, Mo. Albany, 111. 2,419 330 10 Hartford, Ml. North Pekin, 111. 5,789 179 11 Hartford, 111. Albany, 111. 4,917 316 12 Hartford, 111. North Pekin, 111. 11,128 179 ili PAGE RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS MILES GAS i OIL, FUEL OIL 113 Hartford, 111. Minnesota River, Minn. 2,386 660 114 Hartford, 111. Davenport, la. 5,828 285 115 Hartford, 111. Clinton, la. 9,362 321 116 Hartford, 111. Cicero, 111. 24,278 338 117 Mount Vernon, Ind. Rock Island, 111 . 2,681 634 118 Mount Vernon, Ind. Cicero, 111. 22,464 687 119 Beaumont, Tex. LaGrange, Mo. 7,228 1322 120 Beaumont, Tex. St. Paul , Minn. 5,264 1823 121 Beaumont, Tex. Cicero, 111. 10,600 1521 122 Port Arthur, Tex. Cicero, 111. 33,838 1515 123 Port Arthur, Tex. Cicero, 111. 6,166 1515 124 Cicero, 111. St. Louis, Mo. 3,124 359 RESIDUAL FUEL OIL 125 Hartford, 111. Peru, 111. 1,212 242 126 Hartford, 111. Peru, 111. 13,964 242 127 Mount Vernon, Ind. Cicero, 111. 33,055 687 128 Violet, La. Cicero, 111. 154,521 1415 129 New Orleans, La. Cicero, 111. 10,746 1399 130 Norco, La. Cicero, 111. 58,673 1372 131 Baton Rouge, La. Cicero, 111. 37,107 1265 132 Baton Rouge, La. Havana, Ml. 12,044 1068 133 Memphis, Tenn. Peru, 111. 1,422 658 13^ Hartford, 111. Cicero, 111. 7,756 341 135 Hartford, 111. St. Paul, Minn. 5,891 643 136 Mount Vernon, Ind. Cicero, 111. 55,356 689 137 Beaumont, Tex. St. Paul, Minn. 1,376 1825 138 Texas City, Tex. Cicero, 111. 1,410 1583 139 Texas City, Tex. Cicero, 111. 8,254 1583 140 Dolton, 111. Hartford, 111. 156,507 344 141 Corpus Christ? , Tex. Havana, 111. 48,228 1588 LUBR ICATING OILS, GREASE 142 Lake Charles, La. Cicero, 111. 74,138 1478 143 Houston, Tex. Indiana Harbor, Ind. 44,889 1641 144 Port Arthur, Tex. Cicero, 111. 19,414 1521 145 Beaumont, Tex. St. Paul, Minn. 16,103 1818 146 Indiana Harbor, Ind. Galena Park, Tex. 2,040 1768 147 Indiana Harbor, Ind. Hartford, 111. 7,212 356 ALIPHATIC NAPTHA 148 Hartford, 111. Indiana Harbor, Ind. 5,847 356 149 Houston, Tex. Cicero, 111. 7,847 1623 150 Kenova, W. Va. Cicero, 111. 1,074 1200 151 Beaumont, Tex. Cicero, 111. 18,136 1516 tv PAGE RIVER ORIGIi RIVER DESTINATION PETROLEUM ASPHAL T 152 Hartford, 111. 153 Hartford, 111. 154 St. Paul, Minn. 155 Smiths Bluff, Tex. OTHER PETROLEUM PRODUCTS 156 Baton Rouge, La. 157 Texas City, Tex. SAND - GRAVEL - ROCK 158 159 St. Louis, Mo. Bel lefontai ne, Mo. BUILDING CEMENT 160 St. Louis, Mo. 161 Vermillion River, 111. 162 Clarksville, Mo. 163 Clarksville, Mo. 164 Clarksville, Mo. 165 Hannibal, Mo. DRY SULPHUR 166 LaFourche, La. 167 Joliet, 111. IRON AND STEEL SCRAP 168 Paducah, Ky. 169 Davenport, la, 170 Chicago, 111. CASTINGS AND FORGINGS 171 South Chicago, 111. 172 Gary, Ind. STEEL MILL PRODUCTS 173 Gary, Ind. 174 South Chicago, 111. 175 Gary, Ind. IRON AND STEEL PRODUCTS 176 South Chicago, 111. IRON ORE CONCENTRATES 177 Burnside, 178 Burnside. La. La. Cicero, 111. Cicero, 111. Baton Rouge, La, Cicero, Ml. Cicero, 111 Cicero, 111 Cicero, I Alton, II Pekin, 111. St. Louis, Mo. Nashville, Tenn. Galveston, Tex. Michoud Canal , La, St. Louis, Mo. Marseilles, 111 St. Louis, Mo. Alton, 111. St. Louis, Mo. Guntersvll 1e, Ala, Granite City, 111 Houston, Tex. Houston, Tex. St. Louis, Mo. New Orleans, La. Houston, Tex. Indiana Harbor, Ind, Calumet Harbor, 111 , RIVER TONS MILES 74,424 11,862 8,111 18,275 341 341 1576 1512 12,451 1,528 1265 1583 1,452 10,500 355 20 36,277 66,709 141,983 85,449 112,914 131,100 193 259 525 1482 1145 129 19,710 12,035 1356 326 717 6,871 8,777 248 302 949 536 3,559 362 1768 3,181 4,458 1,807 1771 340 1407 27,701 165,090 5,717 1757 1347 1336 RIVER PAGE RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS MILES MANGANESE 179 Burnside, La. South Chicago, 111. 1 ,257 1340 180 Pittsburgh, Pa. Gary, Ind. 1,243 1542 PIG IRON 181 Sheffield, Ala. Calumet Harbor, 111. 1,586 852 182 Sheffield, Ala. Calumet Harbor, 111, 9,192 852 INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS 183 Lake Charles, La. Joliet, 111. 99,467 1452 184 Lake Charles, La. Joliet, 111. 2,431 1452 185 Deer Park, Tex. Cicero, 111. 52,320 1614 186 Nor co, La. Cicero, 111. 13,732 1372 187 Marmet, W. Va. Seneca, 111. 30,000 1254 188 Memphis, Tenn. Lake Calumet, 111. 5,400 771 189 Barfield, Ark. Louisiana, Mo. 49,692 426 190 Am. Cyanlmld Fortier Hannibal , Mo. 55,000 1148 Pit., La. SODIUM HYDROXIDE 191 Gelsmar, La. Chicago, 111. 15,016 1314 COAL TAR. CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 192 Deer Park, Tex. Cicero, 111. 5,479 1614 193 New Orleans, La. Joliet, 111. 1,748 1374 19 2 * Texas City, Tex. Cicero, 111. 1,264 1582 195 Corpus Christl, Tex. Treats Island, 111. 16,065 1747 ALCOHOLS 196 Baton Rouge, La. Cicero, 111. 24,368 1265 197 West Lake, La. Cicero, 111. 2,829 1478 198 Calumet Harbor, 111. St. Albans, W. Va. 70,086 1311 199 Plaquemlne, La. Minneapolis, Minn. 3,773 1638 SULPHURIC ACID 200 St. Louis, Mo. Channahan, 111. 21,255 359 201 Cincinnati, Ohio Joliet, 111. 2,051 796 PHOSPHATE ROCK 202 Burnside, La. Qulncy, 111. 4,447 1119 203 Tampa, Fla. Joliet, 111. 115,305 1846 FERTILIZER AND FERTILIZER MAT. 204 Cicero, 111. Tampa Harbor, Fla. 33,600 1872 NITROGENOUS FERTILIZER 205 St. Louis, Mo. Calumet Harbor, 111. 22,155 484 v! PAGE RIVE3 ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS RIVER MILES SUPERPHOSPHATE 206 New Orleans, La. 207 Harlem, La. 208 Florence, Ala. South Chicago, St. Paul, Minn, Palmyra, Mo. 111. 1,240 4,161 2,990 1410 1745 625 FERTILIZERS - NEC 209 Houston, Tex. Channahan, 111, 38,514 1584 SUGAR 210 Burnside, La. 211 Albania, La. Chicago, 111. Chicago, 111. 146,432 24,616 1339 1542 NON-METALLIC MINERALS 212 Brownsville, Tex. SALT 213 Jefferson Island, La. 214 Jefferson Island, La. 215 Belle Isle, La. 216 Cote Blanche, La. 217 Weeks Island, La. 218 Jefferson Island, La. 219 Belle Isle, La. 220 Cote Blanche, La. INEDIBLE MOLASSES 221 New Orleans, La. LIME 222 Ste. Genevieve, Mo. 223 Ste. Genevieve, Mo. BENZOL AND BENZENE 224 Hartford, 111. 225 Cicero, 111. 226 Houston Ship Channel 227 Hartford, 111. WOOD PULP 228 Baton Rouge, La. STANDARD NEWSPRINT PAPER 229 Hiwassee River, Tenn. TALLOW - ANIMAL FATS - OILS South Chicago, 111. 9,461 230 231 Dubuque, la, Chicago, 111. Cicero, 111. Calumet Harbor, 1 1 1 Calumet Harbor, 1 1 1 Dolton, 111. Beaumont, Tex. Romeovi lie, 111. St. Paul , Minn. Chicago, 111. Minneapolis, Minn, Avondale, La, Avondale, La, 3,815 1926 Chicago, 111. 58,063 1379 Dubuque, la. 7,914 1422 Savage, Minn. 128,172 1688 Prairie DuChien, Wis. 14,973 1498 Minneapolis, Minn. 1,412 1681 Davenport, la. 10,772 1327 Calumet Harbor, 111. 181,719 1375 Dolton, 111. 68,461 1412 1399 11,027 453,967 442 442 5,829 1,819 19,854 2,445 342 1516 1628 419 31,201 1265 7,196 1410 25,371 24,231 1434 1292 vll SUPPLEMENTAL INDEX OF COMMODITY MOVEMENTS RATE ANALYSIS SHEETS SUPPLEMENTAL INDEX OF COMMODITY MOVEMENTS LOCKS NO. 26 - MISSISSIPPI RIVER VERMILLION LOCKS - INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY PAGE RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS RIVER MILES Tex, GASOLINE 51 Beaumont JET FUEL 52 Atreco, Tex. KEROSENE 53 Beaumont, Tex. 54 Beaumont, Tex. 55 Beaumont, Tex. 56 Beaumont, Tex. GAS OIL, FUEL OIL 57 Beaumont, Tex. 58 Beaumont, Tex. 59 Beaumont, Tex. 510 Port Arthur, Tex. 511 Port Arthur, Tex. RESIDUAL FUEL OIL 51 2 Beaumont, Tex. 5 1 3 Texas City, Tex. 514 Texas City, Tex. 51 5 Corpus Christ!, Tex, LUBRICATING OILS. GREASE 516 Lake Charles, La. 51 7 Houston, Tex. 518 Port Arthur, Tex. 51 9 Beaumont, Tex. 520 Indiana Harbor ALIPHATIC NAPTHA Ind. Bettendorf, la. Cicero, 111. Bettendorf, la. St. Paul , Minn. Black River, Wis, Cicero, 111. Mo. LaGrange, . St. Paul, Minn, Cicero, 111. Cicero, 111. Cicero, 111. St. Paul , Minn. Cicero, 111. Cicero, 111. Havana, 111. Cicero, 111. Indiana Harbor, Ind, Cicero, 111. St. Paul , Minn. Galena Park, Tex. S21 Houston, Tex. Cicero, 111. S22 Beaumont, Tex. Cicero, 111. PETROLEUM ASPHALT S23 Smiths Bluff, Tex. Cicero, 111. OTHER PETROLEUM PRODUCTS S24 Texas City, Tex. Cicero, 111. BUILDING CEMENT S25 Clarksville, Mo. Galveston, Tex vlli 58,535 1473 2,059 1700 2,392 4,827 11,410 3,637 1473 1823 1679 1521 1,292 5,264 10,600 33,838 6,166 1322 1823 1521 1515 1515 1,376 1,410 8,254 48,228 1825 1583 1583 1588 74,138 44,889 19,414 16,103 2,040 1478 1641 1521 1818 1768 7,847 18,136 1623 1516 18,275 1512 1,528 1583 85,449 1482 PAGE RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS RIVER MILES CASTINGS AND FORGIMGS S26 Gary, Ind. Houston, Tex. 3,559 1 768 STEEL MILL PRODUCTS S27 Gary, Ind. Houston, Tex. 3,181 1771 IRON AND STEEL PRODUCTS S28 South Chicago, 111. Houston, Tex. 27,701 1757 INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS 529 Lake Charles, La. 530 Lake Charles, La. 531 Deer Park, Tex. Joliet, 111. Joliet, 111. Cicero, 111. 99,467 2,i+31 52,320 1452 1452 1614 COAL TAR, CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 532 Deer Park, Tex. 533 Texas City, Tex. S3** Corpus Christ! , Tex. Cicero, 111. Cicero, 111. Treats Island, 111. 5,479 1,264 16,055 1614 1582 1747 ALCOHOLS S35 West Lake, La. Cicero, 111. 2,829 1478 FERTILIZERS - NEC S36 Houston, Tex. Channahan, 111. 38,51^ 1584 NON-METALLIC MINERALS S37 Brownsville, Tex. South Chicago, 111. 9,461 1926 BENZOL AND BENZENE 538 Cicero, 111. 539 Houston Ship Channel Beaumont, Tex. Romeov i 1 1 e , 111. 1,819 19,854 1516 1628 ix ATTACHMENT TO DONLEY REPORT RATE ANALYSIS SHEETS TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn TONNAGE (SHORT TORS) 1544 BEAR ORIGIN Davenport, Iowa SEAR DESTINATION Guntersvi 1 le, Ala, EXISTING mmfflSZmVtiW) To St. Louis $3.90 NT(1) RAIL 28300 RA I L OXXKKKKKKiXK RATE : Beyond $6,015 NT(2) MILES 703 Total $9,915 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $3.60 NT(1) Barge Beyond $3.40 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 889 Barge $ 4.46 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.46 NT REhARKS Existing rates subject to aggregate of 270 NT per shipment. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS Ijn BN92 ICC 112 (4) (2) SFA 972E ICC S-1185 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) WOl BEAR ORIGIN Havana, Illinois BEAR DESTINATI ON Guntersvi 1 le, Ala, EXISTING XXecXXXJSWWOWO To St. Louis $5.50 NT(1) RAIL 28300 RAIL OGXXHXmWMtt RATE : Beyond $6,015 NT(2) MILES 569 Total $11,515 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - V/ATER Rail to St. Louis $5.50 NT(1) Barge Beyond $3.*+0 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Nat Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE ^ Barge $ 3.98 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 3.93 NT REMARKS : Existing rates subject to aggregate of 270 NT per shipment. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (,) TL-CTR E772G ICC C9^5 (j+) (2) SFA 972A ICC S1185 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-0067) 2 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn TO.JilAGE (SHORT TONS) 10765 BEAR ORIGIN Savage, Minn. SEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, La. EXISTING XMXXXKKKWOCtt&D RAIL 28300 RAIL CDUOBimXMEXRATE: $13.80 NT(1) MILES '210 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $7.26 NT Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE '723 Barge $ 5.20 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.20 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of 11562.5 NT in 5 movements of 2312.5 NT per movement. Alternative rail rate constructed on basis of 5.266% of 1st Class based on rate from St. Paul to Louisville, Ky., in WTL 332H ICC A4864. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) CNW 1719^ ICC 1 (k) (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31, 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 3 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY corn TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 6^59 BEAR OR I GIN Savage, Minn. SEAR DESTINATI ON Destrehan, La. fiSWJWWCXX* CONSTRUCTED To St. Louis $7.26 NT RAIL 28300 RAIL Wxfiltmm RATE : Beyond $6.10 NT(1) MILES 1210 Total $13.36 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $7.26 NT Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1702 Barge $ 5.20 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.20 NT REMARKS: Rail ra te constructed on basis 5.266% of 1st Class based on ' rate from St. Paul to Louisville, Ky. in WTL 332H ICC A4864, Existing rail rate beyond St. Louis subject to aggregate of 950 NT per shipment, 190M per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 988A ICC S-90S CO (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) k - TRAFFIC SURVEY KATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY corn TOiJMAGE (SHORT TONS) 156853 BEAR ORIGIN Savage, Minn. SEAR DEST I NAT I ON Baton Rouge, La. EXISTING y^ffljmRfflffflBD RAIL 28300 RA I L QfoXfXW^SCXWfiC RATE : $13.00 NT(1) MILES H78 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $7.26 NT Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1589 Barge $ 5.20 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.20 NT REMARKS Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of 23125 NT in 5 movements of 4625 NT per movement. Alternative rail rate constructed on basis 5.266% of 1st Class based on rate from St. Paul to Louisville, Ky. in WTL 332H ICC A4864. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) CNW 1719^ ICC 1 (4) (2) (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 , 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 30kk6 BEAR ORIGIN$avage, Minn. 8EAR DESTINATION New 0rleans » La - EXISTINGX0KX«»^¥K^WD RAIL 28300 RAIL mX.PMMXM RATE: $13.00 NT (1) MILES "78 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER R a'l to St. Louis $7.26 NT Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE ,716 Bar 9 e $ 5 ' 2 ° NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.20 NT REHARKS . Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of 23125 NT in 5 * movements of 4625 NT per movement. Alternative rail rate constructed on bests 5.266% of 1st Class based on rate from St. Paul to Louisville, Ky. in WTL 332H ICC A4864. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) CNW 1719^ ICC 1 (if) (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 6 - TRAFFI C SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn TO.J.IAGE (SHORT TOWS) 6l46l REAR ORIGIN Florence, 111. SEAR DESTINATION Baton Rouge, La. EXISTING >Ofo)OQtmWJC To St. Louis $3.50 NT(l') RAIL 28300 RAIL Qfo)ffl>fi6W)MG( RATE : Beyond $6.10 NT (2) MILES 745 Total $9.60 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail t0 St § Louis $3.50 NT(1) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1014 Barge $ 4.03 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.03 NT REMARKS Existing rail rate beyond St. Louis subject to aggregate of 950 NT per shipment, 190M per car. EXPLANATION Of REFERENCE MARKS (1) NSW 1047A ICC 10364 (4) (2) SFA 988A ICC S909 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) TRA FFIC SURVEY K ATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn TOiJMAGE (SHORT TONS) 94198 REAR OR I Gli! Havana, 111. BEAR DESTINATION Baton Rouge, La. EXISTING^tf^TJftofflTftD RAIL 28300 RAIL (^xftkft&lxMR RATE: $7.30 NT(1) MILES 763 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $5.50 NT(2) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1069 Barge $ 4.03 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.03 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of 475 NT per shipment, 180M per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) ICG 602 ICC 36 (k) (2)TL-CTR E772G ICC C9^5 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) 9 - COMMODITY Corn BEAR ORIGIN Pekin, 111. TRAFFIC SUR VEY R ATE A HA LYSIS TOiJMAGE (SHORT TOWS) 22327 SEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, La. EXISTiNGXfntXRmXXRMfilED RAIL 28300 RAIL .fl&xfckR&WcNR RATE: $7.30 NT(1) MILES 820 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $6.10 NT (2) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 12 35 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Barge $ 4.03 NT TOTAL 4.03 NT REMARKS Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of 475 NT per shipment 180M per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) ICG 602 ICC 36 (4) (2)TL-CTR E772G ICC C945 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES TONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 10 - TRAFF IC SU RVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn TO, MAGE (SHORT TONS) 7055 BEAR ORIGIN Pekln, 111. SEAR DESTINATION Baton Rouge, La. EXISTINGmXKWBaWKOCKBD RAIL 28300 RA I L OOCX&kBBGXKMX RATE : $7.30 NT(1) MILES 798 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $6.10 NT (2) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HOI Barge $ 4.22 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.22 NT R E HARKS * Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of 475 NT per shipment 180M per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) ICG 602 ICC 36 (k) (2)TL-CTR E772G ICC C945 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 11 TRAF FIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn BEAR ORIGIN Pekln, 111. existing mtm&< RA TE: Beyond $7.30 NT(2) MILES 878 Total $11.50 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Ra il to St. Louis $6.80 NT (3) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE '3^5 Barge $ 4.52 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.52 NT REMARKS: «.•,-.«. Rail rate beyond subject to aggregate of 475 NT per shipment 180M per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (U CRI&P 34560F ICC CI 3727 (4) (2) ICG 602 ICC 36 (5) (3) TL-CTR E772G ICC C345 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 21 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 21028 BEAR ORIGIN Alton, 111. BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, La. EXISTIN(X)^)flX«JBSvTBaXOCraD RAIL 28300 RAIL flfcxRk&WXWa RATE: $6.10 NT(1) MILES 685 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) M? les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1° 68 3ar 9e $ 3. 16 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 3J6 NT R EHARKS ' Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of 950 NT per shipment 190M per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 988A ICC S909 (k) (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 - 22 - CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) TRA FFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 6099 BEAR ORIG!i\' LaGrange, Mo. BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, La. EXISTING KXKKHXWCWTOBt) To St. Louis $3.90 NT(1) RAIL 28300 RAIL 0ROJXW)8WM8( RATE: Beyond $6.10 NT (2) MILES 860 Total $10.00 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $3.90 NT(1) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 120 ° Bar 9 e $ k ' 2S NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.26 NT REMARKS: , Existing rail rate beyond St. Louis subject to aggregate of 950 NT per shipment, 190M per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (,) BN92 ICC 112 GO ( 2 ) SFA 988A ICC S909 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 23 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn BEAR ORIGIN Kingston, la, TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 29**2 SEAR DESTINATION Westwego, La, EXISTINGXWDCXXJKBJnttJCXXD To St. Louis $7.80 NT(1) RAIL 28300 RAIL rnxfiflXAM RATE: Beyond $6.10 NT(2) MILES 8 57 Total $13.90 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $7.30 NT(l) Beyond Barge $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1282 Barge 4.70 NT TOTAL $ 4.70 NT REMARK Vxi sting rail rate beyond St. Louis subject to aggregate of 950 NT per shipment, 190M per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) BN92 ICC 112 (4) (2) SFA 933A ICC S909 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 2k TRAFF IC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn T0,!,!AGE (SHORT TONS) 1222** BEAR ORIGIN St. Paul, Minn. SEAR DESTINATION Westwe 9°, L a - EXISTIN(M^W^Wft$ RAIL 28300 RAIL (XKWMWvpWft RATE: $13.80 NT ( 1) MILES 1210 ALTERNATIVE RATES: rail - WATER Rail to St. Louis $7.26 NT Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1701 Barqe $ 5.20 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE ' y HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.20 NT REMARKS -Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of 11562.5 NT in 5 'movements of 2312.5 NT per movement. Alternative rail rate constructed on basis 5.266% of 1st Class based on rate from St. Paul to Louisville, Ky. in WTL 332H ICC Aif864. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (!) CNW 1719^ ICC 1 (if) (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 25 - TRAFFIC SURVEY R ATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Soybeans TO. IMAGE (SHORT TONS) 1381 BEAR ORIGIN Florence, 111. SE ar DESTINATION New Orleans, La. EXISTING ¥WTO)Pf) To. St. Louis $4.20 NT(1) RA , L 2 8300 RA I iX^WimWte RATE: Beyond $6.10 NT (2) MILES 767 Total $10.30 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $4.20 NT(1) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - V/ATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1'37 Bar 9 e $ ^'^ NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ ^.08 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate beyond St. Louis subject to aggregate of 950 NT per shipment, 190M per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) BN92 ICC 112 (4) (2) SFA 938A ICC S903 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 26 TRAFF IC SURVEY K ATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Soybeans TO.IMAGE (SHORT TONS) n 263 BEAR ORIGIN Beardstown, 111. SEAR DESTINATION Memphis, Tenn. EXISTING WM/WeTOt/» To St. Louis $3.90 NT(1) RAIL 28300 RA I L XXKfflWeUVNE RATE : Beyond $3.36 NT(2) MILES Total $7.76 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $3.90 NT(l) Barge Beyond $2.38 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) hi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 539 Barge $ 3.06 NT TOTAL 3.06 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rates subject to aggregate of 270 NT per shipment, I90M per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS (1) 3N92 ICC 112 (if) (2) SFA 972E ICC SI 135 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 27 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Soybeans TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2393 BEAR ORIGIN Havana, 111. SEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, La. EXISTINQ(X»(KX)W8W0OOa)e» RAIL 28300 RA I iXXXxXHJfiBWWE RATE: $7.30 NT(1) MILES 762 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $9.00 NT(2) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1202 Barge $ 4.08 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.08 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of 475 NT per shipment in shipper owned cars. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 ICG 602 ICC 36 (4) (2) ICG 15370. ICC A12192 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 28 - T RAFFIC SUR VEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Soybeans TO.IMAGE (SHORT TONS) 28 $2 BEAR ORIGIN Pekin, 111. SEAR DESTINATION Baton Rouge, La. EXISTINKXBKXKHMfltfKHBXKD RAIL 28300 RAIKXHKXRKKBKXXE RATE: $7.30 i IT ( 1 ) MILES 798 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $9.00 NT(2) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barqe-Rai 1 or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Nrt Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE "30 Bar 9 e $ k ' 22 MT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.22 NT REMARKS : Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of 475 NT per shipment in shipper owned cars. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) ICG 602 ICC 306 (4) (2) ICG 15370. ICC A12192 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 29 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Soybeans TO.JilAGE (SHORT TONS) *3591 BEAR ORIGIN Kingston, Iowa BEAR DESTINATI ON All iance, La. EXISTINQ(XXKm\K>m x 001)£D To St. Louis $7.80 NT(1 ) RAIL 28300 RAILXXKXJBWSBUflXIE RATE: Beyond $6.10 NT (2) MILES 923 Total $13.90 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $7.80 NT(1) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1320 Barge $ 4.55 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.55 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate beyond subject to aggregate of 950 NT per shipment, 190M per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) BN92 ICC 112 (*0 ( 2 ) SFA 9'38A ICC S909 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 , 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 30 - TRA FFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Soybeans TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 23068 BEAR ORIGIN Savage, Minn. BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, La. EXISTING BKXBBNmWftgB RAIL 28300 RAIL HKXPXRKKXHK RATE: $13.00 NT(1) MILES 1210 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $13.20 NT (2) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1723 Barge $ SM NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5MNT REMARKS: Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of 23125 NT in 5 movements of 4625 NT each. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) CNW 1719^ ICC 1 (4) (2) v/TL 332H ICC A4364 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 31 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Soybeans TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 15308 BEAR ORIGIN Naples, 111. BEAR DESTINATION Pascagoula, Miss. EXISTIN(XJO»(X)ONS3raUOTB0 To St. Louis $3.50 NT(1) RAIL 28300 RA I L XJR0W)fiBCWJE RATE : Beyond $6.10 NT (2) MILES 743 Total $9.60 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $3.50 NT(1) Barge Beyond $4.55 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1255 Barge $ 4.81 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.81 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate beyond subject to aggregate of 950 NT per shipment, 190M per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) NSW 1047A ICC 10364 00 (2) SFA 988A ICC S909 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 32 - TRA FFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Barley and Rye TONNAGE (SHORT TOWS) 13680 BEAR ORIGIN St. Paul, Minn. BEAR DESTINATION Louisville, Ky. EXISTING ORxEJOKSTRWHTIBX RAIL 28300 RAIL ORxttmXNfXRATE : $7,595 NT(1) MILES 686 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $7.26 NT Barge Beyond $2.37 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1215 3arge $ 5.^0 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.^0 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of 6175 NT per shipment 130M per car 65 cars. Rail rate to St. Louis constructed on basis' of 5.266% of 1st Class based on rate from St. Paul to Louisville, Ky. in WTL 332H ICC A4864. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) WTL 332H ICC Aif864 ■ CO • (2) ■ (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW+3-75-C-0067) - 33 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Barley and Rye TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 9240 BEAR ORIGIN St. Paul, Minn. BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, La. 830QCRMWX OR CONSTRUCTED To St. Louis $7.26 NT RAIL 28300 RA I L XOBCXKKWKXKIK RATE : Beyond $6.10 NT(1) MILES 1210 Total $13.36 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $7.26 NT Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1701 Barge $ 5.45 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.45 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed on basis 5.266% of 1st Class based on rate from St. Paul to Louisville, Ky. in WTL 332H ICC A4864. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 988A ICC S909 (4) (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 34 IiiAFFK_SJJRVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMOD.TY Ba r ,e y a„d Rye TO„MA GE (SHORT TONS) 8 5 8 3 BEAR 0RI6IH St. Pau!, Minn. SEAR DEST1NAT|0N ,, ew 0rIeans> ^ EXXCTXKgXtWXCONSTRUCTED To St Louis <7 7£ „t RA.L mmm RATE: £J^ 57 ; 26 ,T (]) ^ moo ^ ALTERNATIVE RATES: T ° U1 $13 ^"T RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $7 .26 NT Barge Beyond $3 .6 9 NT TRUCK - WATER tLLies Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1701 n 1/01 Barge $ 5.45 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER T0TAl - $ 5.^5 NT REMARKS: rate from sT'pIT f ?° ? M !» 5 ' 266% ° f ,St Class bas * d « rate from St. Paul to Louisville, Ky. in WTL 332H ICC A4864. EXPLA NATION OF REFERENCE MARKS i) SFA 933A ICC S909 (2) (3) CO (5) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 35 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Oats TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 18722 BEAR ORIGIN St. Paul, Minn. BEAR DESTINATION Vlcksburg, Miss. RAIL 28300 WvlWJXXXXKK CONSTRUCTED To St. Louis $7.26 NT RAIL XXKHXDflBlXPNt RATE: Beyond $5.97 MT(1 Total $13.23 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: MILES 1033 RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $7.26 NT Barge Beyond $3-35 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Miles 1369 lode Barge Rate per Net Ton 5.21 NT TOTAL 5.21 NT REMARKS: Constructed rail rate on basis of 5.266% of 1st Class based on rate from St. Paul to Louisville, Ky. in WTL 332H ICC Ak8Sk, EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 972A ICC SI 185 CO (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 36 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Oats TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 9*+72 BEAR ORIGIN Savage, Minn. BEAR DESTINATION Vicksburg, Miss. >6R«8W}WGXXXK CONSTRUCTED To St. Louis $7.26 NT RAIL 28300 RA I L XJBOefljeBDflJWeC RATE : Beyond $5.97 NT( I) MILES 1033 Total $13.23 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $7.26 NT Barge Beyond $3.35 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1391 Barge $ 5.21 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.21 NT REMARKS: Constructed rail rate on basis of 5.266% of 1st Class based on rate from St. Paul to Louisville, Ky. in WTL 332H ICC A4864. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 972A ICC SI 185 e*o (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 37 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Oats TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 25500 BEAR OR I G I N Savage, Minn. SEAR DESTINATION Guntersvi 1 le, Ala. EXISTING MX%1W%mmM% To Louisville $7,595 MT(1) RAIL 28300 RAIL MY^miM RATE: Beyond $4,815 NT(2) M 'LES 1014 Total $12.41 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $7.26 NT Barge Beyond $3.40 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1216 Barge $ 5-31 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.31 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate to Louisville subject to aggregate of 6175 NT per shipment 190M per car. Alternative rail rate constructed on basis of 5.266% of 1st Class based on rate from St. Paul to Louisville, Ky. in WTL 332H ICC A4864. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) WTL 332H ICC A4864 (4) (2) SFA 972A ICC SI 185 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 38 TRA FFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Oats TO.JilAGE (SHORT TONS) 15928 BEAR ORIGIN Savage, Minn. SEAR DESTINATION Baton Rouge, La. BMSMXKXXft CONSTRUCTED To St. Louis $7.26 NT RAIL 28300 RAIL XXXXWfiBWME RATE: Beyond $6.10 NT ( 1 ) MILES 1178 Total $13.36 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $7.26 NT Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1539 Barge $ 5.73 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.73 NT Rail rate constructed on basis of 5.266% of 1st Class based on rate from St. Paul to Louisville, Ky. in WTL 332H ICC A4864, EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 988A ICC S909 (k) (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 39 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Oats TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 19^70 BEAR ORIGIN Savage, .Minn. BEAR DESTINATION Shawneetown, 111. mmW*X»RX CONSTRUCTED To St. Louis $7.26 NT RAIL 28300 RAIL »RX*mO)« RATE: Beyond $5.70 MT(1) MILES 616 Total $12.36 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER R&M to St. Louis $7.26 NT Barge Beyond $2.98 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 982 Barge $ 4.23 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.23 NT REMARKS: Constructed rail rate on basis of 5.266% of 1st Class based on rate from St. ?au" to Louisville, Ky. in ' WTL 332H ICC A4864. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS, (1) TL -CTR E772G ICC C9^5 GO (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - kO - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Wheat TOiJNAGE (SHORT TONS) 26427 BEAR ORIGIN Savage, i'iinn. BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, La. EXISTING XMOOONtfKMXftft) RAIL 28300 RAILX)BOB«eGO«D«eQBXOMSfflCUOTBD To St. Louis $3.90 NT(1) RAIL 28300 RA I L XttOWfleDlXlE RATE : Beyond $6.10 NT(2) MILES 811 Total $10.00 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $3.90 NT(1) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1173 Barge $ k.$2 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4 #3? NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate beyond St. Louis subject to aggregate of 950 NT per shipment, 190M per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) BN92 ICC 112 CO (2) SFA 983A ICC S909 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 42 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Wheat TOiJilAGE (SHORT TONS) 5995 BEAR ORIGIN Havana, 111. SE AR DESTINATION Baton Rouge, La. EXISTING) RAIL 28300 RAIL JOB! ;&MJE4XM*E RATE: $7.30 NT( I) MILES 763 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $9.00 NT(2) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1068 Barge $ 4.08 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.08 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of klS NT per shipment in shipper owned cars. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) ICG 602 ICC 36 (4) (2) ICG 15370 ICC A12192 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) **3 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Wheat TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 169** BEAR ORIGIN Peoria, Ml. SEAR DESTINATION Baton Rouge, La. EXISTING )0R()OOt«KDBOOT80 RAIL 28300 RA I L jQGoeWfcCtoiei RATE : $7.30 NT(I) MILES 798 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $9.00 NT (2) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1109 Barge $ 4.15 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ if. 15 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of 475 NT per shipment in shipper owned cars. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 ICG 602 ICC 36 (4) (2) ICG 15370 ICC A12192 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) kk COMMODITY Wheat BEAR ORIGIN Havana, I ] EXISTING 1XWWW RAIL XRXttmCMWRATE: JRA FFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS TOrJiJAGE (SHORT TONS) 1373 SEAR DESTINATION Pascagoula, Miss RAIL 28300 $7.30 NT(1) M|LES ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $9.00 NT(2) Barge Beyond $3.69 NT TRUCK - WATER Bi^lAPiaiJj axge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mf les JjOfje Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1309 Barge $ 4.86 NT REMARKS TOTAL 4.86 NT Existing rail rate subject to aggregate of 475 NT per shipment in shipper owned cars. EXPLANATION OF R EFERENCE MARKS (1) ICG 602 ICC 36 (4) (2) ICG 1537Q ICC A12192 (5) (3 > (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 45 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Wheat TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 4537 BEAR ORIGIN Florence, 111. BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, La. EXISTING XWffl}flGtXJ)We RATE: $6.49 NT(1) MILES 578 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 57 Rail HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 661 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.02 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate subject to minimum of 3,000 NT per shipment 140M per car. Single car rate $9.46 NT(1). Constructed rate would exceed present applicable volume rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) IFA 122A ICC 1157 00 (2) IFA 1-L ICC 1081 (5) (3) ICG 703 ICC 33 (6) $ 2.00 NT(2) $ .32 NT(3) $ 2.70 NT Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 57 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Bituminous Coal, Lignite TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 12984 BEAR ORIGIN Uniontown, Ky. BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minn. HOKWflCWHXHJR CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L fflftOAMHKMJK RATE : $9.37 NT MILES 685 Transfer Charge $ .32 NT (2) ALTERNATIVE RATES: Barge to St. Louis $1.30 NT Rail Beyond $6.49 NT(3) Total $8.11 NT RAIL - WATER TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 978 Barge $ 3.99 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 3.99 NT REMARKS: River Mine - Rail rate constructed on basis of 6.5% of 1st Class rate, which is the average of volume rates currently in effect. Existing rail rate is $9.58 NT(1). EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) IC 3100 ICC E-1926 GO (2) ICG 703 ICC 33 (5) (3) IFA 122A ICC 1157 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 58 TRA FFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITYBItumJnous Coal, Lignite TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 36470 BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, 111. EXISTINGXmXXBWJniXttJCXB RAIL 28300 RAIL JBXXfXffXXXMX RATE: $4.95 NT (1) MILES 295 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 57 Rail $ 1.86 NT(2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN $ .32 NT(3) LINE-HAUL CHARGE 36 1 Barge $ 2.32 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.50 NT REMARKS :Existing rail rate subject to minimum of 2,500 NT per shipment. Single car rate $6.67 NT(1). Constructed rate would exceed present applicable volume rate. Docket 283OO miles shown above from Belleville District (Sparta). EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 MP 150A ICC kOk (k) (2) IFA 1-L ICC 1081 (5) (3) ICG 703 ICC 33 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES PONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 59 TR AFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS I 5 89^0 COMMODITYBItumlnous Coal, Lignite T0;JNAGE (SHORT TONS) „ , Minneapolis, Minn. BEAR ORIGIN Uniontown, Ky. SEAR DESTINATION XXXXmNBX»K CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 685 RA I LXBRXKXKKKXNK RATE: $9.37 NT MILES ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ .32 NT (2) *~ c*- innU $1 10 NT Rail Beyond $6.^9 NT(3) RAIL - WATER targe to St. Louis $l.ju m *<*• ^y^ r g ^ ^ TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 992 Barge $ M5 NT TOTAL 4.15 NT REMARKS: River Mine - Rate constructed on basis ^l^^J^^'iffect. rate, which is the average of volume rates currently in erre Existing rail rate is $9.58 NT(1). EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) |C 3100 ICC E-1926 (if) (2) ICG 703 ICC 33 (5) (3) IFA 122A ICC 1157 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 60 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Bituminous Coal, Lignite TOsMAGE (SHORT TONS) 3030S BEAR ORIGIN Ceredo, W. Va. SEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. )8W5$>W>WG<)ORX CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L X&XtfWftewm RATE : $8 . 1 9 NT M I LES 512 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Rail to River $2.56 NT (2) Transfer Charge $ .32 NT(3) RAIL - WATER Transfer Charge $ A5 NT Rail Beyond $4.95 NT (4) Barge to St. Louis $3.52 NT Total $11.00 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.18 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate is $8.39 NT(1) subject to minimum 2,000 NT per shipment. Single car rate $8.33 NT(1). Rate constructed on basis of 6.3% of 1 st Class, which is the average of volume rates currently in effect. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 CS-0 100M ICC 14255 (4) MP 15GA ICC 404 (2) c&O 2853M ICC 14251 (5) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton 102 Rail $ $ 2.56 NT(2) M NT 1201 Barge $ 5.17 NT (3) ICG 703 ICC 33 ( 6 ) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 61 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RA TE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Bituminous Coal , Lignite TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 13788 BEAR ORIGIN Ceredo, W. Va. SEAR DESTINATION Chicago, 111. >6Ma \rr, mi irr 11 ^o; Date: March 31 , 1975 - 64 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) TRAFFI C SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Bituminous Coal, Lignite TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 64534 BEAR ORIGIN Rochester, Ky. BEAR DESTINATION Alma, Wis. mtimmwi constructed rail 28300 RAIL C^)ft)OE)W*£xRATE: $9.06 NT MILES 652 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ .32 NT(2) RAIL - WATER Barqe to St. Louis $2.00 NT Rail Beyond $7.61 NT (3) Total $9.93 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1064 Barge $ 3.27 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 3.27 NT REMARKS: River Mine - Rail rate constructed on basis of 6.5% of 1st Class rate, which is the average of volume rates currently in effect. Existing rail rate is $9.91 NT(1). EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SFA 837D ICC S-1163 ( 4 ) ( 2 ) ICG 703 ICC 33 (5) (3) I FA 130P ICC AW4 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 65 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COiMMODITYBituminous Coal, Lignite TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 4250 BEAR ORIGIN Ceredo, 17. Va. SEAR DESTINATION Minneapolis, Minn. EXISTINGXBRXRBNXXRMEXHH RAIL 28300 RAILXRRXXXKRKKNR RATE: $12.49 NT(1) MILES 907 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Rail to River $2.56 NT(2) Transfer Charge $ .32 NT(3) RAIL - WATER Transfer Charge $ M NT Rail Beyond $6.49 NT(4) Barge to St. Louis $3.52 NT Total $13.34 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 102 Rail HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1526 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.87 NT REMARKS: Volume does not appear to warrant reduced rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) N&W C&C A3E ICC 13705 CO IFA 122A ICC 1157 (2) C&O 2853M ICC 14251 (5) $ 2.56 NT(2) $ .45 NT $ 5.86 NT (3) ICG 703 ICC 33 ( 6 ) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 66 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Bituminous Coal, Li gni te TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1 8495 BEAR ORIGIN Rosevil.e, Ark. BEAR DESTINATION Cassville, Wis. XRXmXNKXflBC CONSTRUCTED rail 28300 RAILXHXXRXRRKXXR RATE: $10.02 NT MILES 737 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ .32 NT(2) RAIL - WATER Barga to St. Louis $3.1^ NT Rail Beyond $7.1*+ NT Total $10.60 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1210 Barge $ 5.01 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.01 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate is $13.35 NT(1) made combination over Springfield, 111. Rate constructed on basis of 6.8% of 1st Class rate which is the average of volume rates currently in effect. Rail beyond constructed same as above. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (l)SWL 22F ICC 5162 & IFA 122A (k) (2) ICG 703 ICC 33 ,CC 1157 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: .arch 31 , 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 67 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 137258 BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. BEAR DESTINATION Kingston Mines, 111. XRXXmNBXSK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAILX&RXKXRRKXKR RATE: $14.60 NT(2) MILES 851 ALTERNATIVE RATES: XWCkjfcXXWJrea Pipeline to St. Louis $4.94 NT(1) Rail Beyond $5.20 NT(3) Total $10.13 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER Pipeline $ 4.93 NT(1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 184 Barge $ 2.15 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 7.08 NT REMARKS : Actual origin Borger, Texas. Pipeline rates include transfer into barges. Through rate is $19.80 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 77s% of present applicable rate $6.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) Phillips Pipeline Co. 32T (4) (2)SWL 1250. ICC 5007 ,CC 276 (5) (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 ( 6 ) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31. 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 68 - T RAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3316 BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. SEAR DESTINATION Peoria, 111. XRXKXMNKXHB* CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL OKXKKKKKXKKJfcATE : $5.20 NT(1) MILES '5 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - WffiHXX $12.25 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 205 Barge $ 2.26 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 2.26 NT REMARKS- Ra«1 rate constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $6.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (k) (2) Bulk Carriers Conference 21F (5) (3) W '" m (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 - 69 - CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TO.JNAGE (SHORT TONS) 13703 BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. BEAR DESTINATION Peru, 111. WKXRMWWWK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L ftfcxKkRKtXMXR RATE : $6.60 NT(1) MILES 209 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER truck -wmm $16.03 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 265 Barge $ 2.41 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 2.41 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed 772% of present applicable rate $8.60 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 W (2) Bulk Carriers Conference 21F (5) (3) MF ,CC 19 5 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 70 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. wmmimxm constructed TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1871 1 SEAR DESTINATION LaCrosse, Wis. RAIL 28300 MILES RAILjOROflCMJWXftOecRATE: $11.1*0 NT(1) ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - mm $29.99 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton :harge TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1*28 520 Barge 3.52 NT TOTAL 3.52 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $11*. 80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) WTL 1*1*2C ICC Al*922 (*0 (2) Bulk Carriers Conference 21F (5) (3) MF ,CC 195 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 71 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TO.IMAGE (SHORT TONS) 40197 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. BEAR DESTINATION V/inona, Minn. >€*C©S3XDttG0(XK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L XXKXHmXDOeX RATE : $11.80 NT ( 1 ) MILES W ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER truck - mnm $32.72 nt(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 527 Barge $ 3.59 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 3.59 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed 772% of present applicable rate $15.20 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) wtl kklt ICC A4922 (4) (2) Bulk Carriers Conference 21F (5) (3) MF ,CC 195 (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 3 1 , 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) 72 TRA FFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TOrlNAGE (SHORT TOMS) l73*+5 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. SEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minn. ■nWfflKWK%ONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL OHOQXWttXKTCOfcATE : $12.00 NT(1) MILES 52k ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - VJffESRCX $38.27 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 6^3 Barge $ 3.81 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 3.31 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed 772% of present applicable rate $15.^0 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) WTL kk2C ICC A^922 (k) (2) Bui k Carriers Conference 21 F (5) (3) MF » CC 195 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 - 73 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 81230 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. BEAR DESTINATION Qulncy, 111. KXXmXBXBK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 rail mxnmani rate: $10.00 nt(2) miles kks ALTERNATIVE RATES: KKXttXXXKWGfK Pipeline to St. Louis $1.80 NT(1) Rail Beyond $5.00 NT(3) Total $6.80 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER PI pel ine $ 1.80 NT(1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 128 Barge $ ]M NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 3.22 NT REMARKS: Actual origin Ponca City, Okla. Pipeline rates include transfer into barges. Through rate is $13.^0 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class rate. Rate beyond constructed 772% of present applicable rate $6.40 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) Continental Pipeline Co. ICC (k) (2) SWL 125Q. ICC 5007 215 (5) (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) - Ik - TRAFFIC SURVEY KATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, I 11 gmWW&XBKXcONSTRUCTED RAIL BKXKWKKXWEXRATE ALTERNATIVE RATES: $12.60 NT (2) TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 186148 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. RAIL 28300 MILES 698 K/KKKXXWWCP8W Pipeline to St. Louis $1.80 NT(1) Rail Beyond $10.60 NT(3) Total $12.40 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) hi les Mode Rate per Ne t Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 341 Pipeline $ Barge 1.80 NT(1) 3.09 NT TOTAL 4.89 NT REMARKS: Actual origin Ponca City, Okla. Pipeline rate includes transfer into barges. Through rate is $16.80 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 772% of present applicable rate of $13.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) Continental Pipeline Co. ICC (k) (2) Sl/L 125Q ICC 5007 215 (5) (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 75 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 60135 BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. BEAR DESTINATION Canton, Mo. EWSttWGOOGX CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL CTOORWXXWMEX RATE : $13.20 NT (2) MILES 739 ALTERNATIVE RATES: »N«XXXXX»KDefl< Pipeline to St. Louis $4.93 NT(1) Rail Beyond $5.60 NT(3) Total $10.53 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER Pipeline $ 4.93 NT(1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 163 Barge $ 1.20 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 6. i 3 NT REMARKS: Actual origin Borger, Tex. Pipeline rates include transfer into barges. Through rate is $17.60 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 77a% of present applicable rate $7.20 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) Phillips Pipeline Co. 32T 00 (2) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 ,CC 276 (5) (3) IFA 1-1073 ICC 1219 ( 6 ) Date: March 31 , 1975 - 76 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TOJHAGE (SHORT TONS) 252702 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. B£AR DESTINATION North Pek ' n » M1 - ^WM$X$ft x CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL aXXWWftMSX RATE: $11.40 NT(2) MILES 574 ALTERNATIVE RATES: WWX. XX)$#ftX Pipeline to St. Louis $1.80 NT(1) Rail Beyond $5.20 NT(3) Total $7.00 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER Pipeline $ 1.80 NT(1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE ] 79 Barge $ 2.25 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.05 NT REMARKS : Actual origin Ponca City, Okla. Pipeline rate includes transfer into barges. Through rate is $15.40 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $6.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) Continental Pipeline Co. (k) (2) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 ,cc 21 $ ^ (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 - 77 - CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1 1 896 BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. BEAR DESTINATION LaGrange, Mo. MWWM&X8KXC0NSTRUCTED RAIL 28 1°° RAIL MXMmMXXRATE: $5.00 NT(1) MILES 172 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - V^WrXX $11.12 NT (2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 160 Barge $ 1.20 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 1.20 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed 772% of present applicable rate $6>0 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (4) (2) Bulk Carriers Conference 21F (5) (3) MF,CC ' 95 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 - 78 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) TRAFFIC SURVEY R ATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TO.JilAGE (SHORT TONS) 27225 BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Ho. 3EAR DESTINATION Albany, Ml. #W9WW#W CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL O^WftXlW* RATE: $14.60NT(2) m LES 875 ALTERNATIVE RATES: ymW*WW&& Pipeline to St. Louis $4.93 NT(1) Rail Beyond $11.40 NT(3) Total $16.33 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER Pipeline $ 4.93 NT(1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 337 Barge $ 1.86 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 6.79 NT REMARKS: Actual origin Borger, Tex. Pipeline rate Includes transfer into barges. Through rate is $19.80 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate of $14.60 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) Phillips Pipeline Co. 32T (k) (2) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 ,CC 2?6 (5) (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 - 79 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TOrJMAGE (SHORT TONS) 37908 BEAR ORIGIN Ostrica, La. BEAR DESTINATION North Pekln, 111. miMMuim constructed rail 28300 RAIL JCfoOftmaXKX RATE: $15.60 NT(1) MILES 888 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $4.*+3 NT Rail Beyond $5.20 NT (2) Total $11.13 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1304 Barge $ 5.^ NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ SM NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed 87.5% of present applicable rate $17.80 NT. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $6.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 SFA 9^5 ICC S589 ( 4 ) ( 2 > IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 ( 5 ) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 80 TRAFFIC SURVEY KATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TO.IMAGE (SHORT TONS) 17426 BEAR ORIGIN Norco, La. BEAR DESTINATION Black River, Wis. JBWJGWXKXXXK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL C*X)W)eE>W)MEX RATE : $18.80 NT MILES 1096 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $4.03 NT Rail Beyond $11.40 NT(2) Total $16.93 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1535 Barge $ 6.36 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 6.36 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed 87.5% of present applicable rate $21.40 NT. Rate beyond constructed 77z% present applicable rate $14.60 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 SFA 945 ICC S589 (*0 (2) wtl 442C ICC A4922 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 81 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 26815 BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. BEAR DESTINATION Bettendorf, la. «KMffiMMK)Qft( CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 MIL )Oto)flW)etXDWe< RATE: $8.68 NT(1) MILES 230 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - m/m $16.33 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 487 Barge $ 3.29 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 3.29 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed 773% of present applicable rate $11.20 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 IFA 101-7B ICC 1219 (*0 (2) Bulk Carriers Conference 21F (5) (3) f/|F lcc '95 (6 ) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 3 1 , 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) - 82 - TRAFFIC SURVEY KATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TO.IiJAGE (SHORT TONS) 20362 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. SEAR DESTINATION V/lnona, Minn. >0JOQ»QXDMGCOfK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L XXKXXDeeiXDOeX RATE : $12.60 NT(2) MILES 689 ALTERNATIVE RATES: XKWXXXXMKDGftC Pipeline to St. Louis $1.80 NT(1) Rail Beyond $11.80 NT(3) Total $13.60 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER Pipeline $ 1.80 NT(1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 521 Barge $ 3.24 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.04 NT REMARKS: Actual origin Ponca City, Okla. Pipeline rates include transfer into barges. Through rate Is $16.80 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8,S% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate of $15.20 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) Continental Pipeline Co. ICC (**) < 2 ) Sl/L 1250. ICC 5007 215 ^ (3) WTL 442-C ICC A4922 ( 6 ) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 83 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 58535 BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Tex. BEAR DESTINATION Bettendorf, la. »C«D®& r Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1^73 Barge $ 6.60 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 6.60 NT REMARKS: Through rate is $22.20 NT. Rail rate constructed on basis 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 77^% of presem applicable rate $11.20 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 CO (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACWJ+3-75-C-0067) - 94 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Kerosene TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) Zf827 BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Tex. BEAR DESTINATION St - Paul • Minn - «WtfpCPNt*WK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAILWKNXWeWNtfRATE: $17.60 NT(1) MILES 1209 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $5.^1 NT Rail Beyond $12.00 NT(3) Total $18.91 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE ' 8 23 Barge $ 8.60 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.60 NT REMARKS: Through rate is $26.80 NT. Rail rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $15.60 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (4) (2) WTL 442C ICC A^922 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 95 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Kerosene TONMAGE (SHORT TONS) 11410 BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Tex. SEAR DESTINATION Black River, Wis. RXXXXXMflXflR CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL OfcxMRRkXMRXRATE : $17.20 NT(1) MILES 1169 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Baroe to St. Louis $5.41 NT Rail Beyond $11.40 NT (2) Total $18.31 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1679 Barge $ 8.05 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.05 NT REMARKS: Through rate is $26.00 NT. Rail rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $14. 60 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (4) (2) WTL 442C ICC A4922 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES. Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) - 96 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Kerosene TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3637 BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Tex. BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. yxmrnzm constructed rail 28300 RAIL OKXKKWKBKWJfcATE : $15.60 NT(1) MILES 990 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $5.^1 NT Rail Beyond $10.60 NT (2) Total $17.51 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Node Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1521 Barge $ 7.99 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 7.99 NT REMARKS -Through rate Is $22.60 NT. Rail rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 77^% of present applicable rate $13.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (if) ( 2 ) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 97 TRAFFIC SURVEY KATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil , Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 176893 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. S £AR DESTINATION North Pekin, 111. KXH8JW»«X»KXC0NSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL OKXraWftXflCXRATE: §11.40 NT (2) MILES 574 ALTERNATIVE RATES: F&NWXXXX&WeW Pipeline to St. Louis $1.55 NT(1) Rail Beyond $8.80 NT( Total $10.35 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER Pipeline $ 1.55 NT(1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 179 Barge $ 1.33 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 2.88 NT REMARKS: Actual origin Ponca City, Okla. Pipeline rates include transfer into barge. Through rate Is $15.60 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $11.40 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) Continental Pipe Line Co. (4) (2) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 ' CC 215 (5) (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 3 1 , 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) - 98 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 31683 BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. BEAR DESTINATION Albany, 111. EWJQWXHXXK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL (XKXXMQUMJeC RATE : $14. 60 NT (2) MILES 875 ALTERNATIVE RATES: FtfK!)tX*X*tfffleft< Pipeline to St. Louis $4.24 NT(1) Rail Beyond $13.00 NT(3) Total $17.24 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER Pipeline $ 4.24 NT(1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 330 Barge $ 2.20 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 6.44 NT REMARKS -Actual origin Borger, Texas. Pipeline rates include transfer 'into barge. Through rate is $19.80 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $16.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1 Phi Hips Pipe Line Co. 32T ICC (4) (2)BWL 125Q ICC 5007 276 (5) (3)FA 1-107B ICC 1219 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 99 TR AFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TO.JMAGE (SHORT TOMS) 32580 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. SEAR DESTINATION Quincy, 111. KXXKXNBXBKXCONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL HKXRmKXNK RATE: $10.00 NT (2) MILES ^9 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RXNXXXXXKW08X Pipeline to St. Louis $1.55 NT(1) Rail Beyond $8.80 NT(3) Total $10.35 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER Pipeline $ 1.55 NT(1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 128 Barge $ 1.09 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 2.64 NT REMARKS: Actual origin Ponca City, Okla. Pipeline rates include transfer into barge. Through rate is $13.80 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 772% of present applicable rate $11.^0 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) Continental Pipe Line Co. ICC {k) (2) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 215 (5) (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW+3-75-C-0067) - 100 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 18583 BEAR ORIGIN Violet, La. BEAR DESTINATION Black River, Wis. QDtSXXXKXXKX CONSTRUCTED RAIL XXXffXmXXDEX RATE: $16.60NT(1) RAIL 28300 MILES 1096 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $4.89 NT Rail Beyond $16.60 NT (2) Total $22.99 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1582 Barge 6.71 NT TOTAL 6.71 NT REMARKS: Through rate is $21.40 NT. Rail rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class rate. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate of $21.40 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 945 ICC S589 (2) WTL 442C ICC A4922 (3) (4) (5) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 101 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Of 1 . Fuel Oil TO.J.JAGE (SHORT TOMS) 1841 BEAR ORIGIN New Orleans, La. BEAR DESTINATION Black River, Wis. xxxmwGxrax constructed rail 28300 RAIL flRXjexmXXXXRATE: $16.60 NT(1) MILES 1096 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $4.87 NT Rati Beyond $16. 60 NT(2) Total $22.97 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1562 Barge $ 7.01 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 7.01 NT REMARKS: Through rate is $21.40 NT. Rail rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class rate. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate of $21.40 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 945 ICC S589 (4) (2) WTL 442C ICC A4922 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) 102 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TO.JilAGE (SHORT TONS) W3 BEAR ORIGIN Memphis, Tenn. SEAR DESTINATION Lyons, la. XXXXJraWBXSRX CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL »XX*XmXXKXRATE : $ 1 1 . 00 NT ( 1 ) MILES 538 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $2.27 NT Rail Beyond $13.00 NT (2) Total $16.77 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 738 Barge $ 4.08 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.08 NT REMARKS: Through rate is $15.20 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class rate. Rate beyond constructed 772% of present applicable rate $16.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 (4) (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 103 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 7208 BEAR ORIGIN st. Louis, Mo. BEAR DESTINATION Bettendorf, la. *MmM*M CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 M'LxffixfltmMX RATE: $13.00 NT(1) MILES 230 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK -xMffift $19.25 NT (2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 307 Barge $ 2.75 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 2.75 NT REMARKS: Through rail rate $16.80 NT. Rail rate constructed 77t% of present applicable rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS ( 1 ) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (*+) (2) BCC 21F MF ICC 195 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW+3-75-C-0067) - 104 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS OMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil T0;J.1AGE (SHORT TONS) 6055 EAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. SEAR DESTINATION Fulton, 111. KXMXN8XJBRXC0NSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 MIL 8KXKXKRKXNKXRATE: $13.00 NT (1) MILES 261 LTERNATIVE RATES: IAIL - WATER rRUCK - WftRRX $20.83 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton HARGE TO RIVER "XNDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN INE-HAUL CHARGE 3^0 Barge $ 2.42 NT ^NDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION HARGE EX RIVER THER TOTAL $ 2.42 NT EHARKS: Through rail rate $16.80 NT. Rail rate constructed 77i% of present applicable rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 1) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (M 2) BCC 21F MF ICC 195 (5) 3) (6) ate: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 105 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TO.JNAGE (SHORT TOMS) 3149 BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. SEAR DESTINATION Winona, Minn. EMGWXtfXXXK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L X*X)04)fleW)WEX RATE : $17.00 NT ( 1 ) MILES 456 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - XKWBGX $38.^6 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 5*+5 Barge $ 3.61 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER T °TAL $ 3.6I NT REMARKS: Through rail rate $22.00 NT. Rail rate constructed 77^% of present applicable rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 WTL kk2C ICC A*+922 CO (2) BCC 21F MF ICC 195 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) 106 TRA FFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TO.JiJAGE (SHORT TONS) 21975 BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. BEAR DESTINATION Burlington, la. «N«W)NG(XHX CONSTRUCTED RAIL. 28300 RAIL aRXXNmWMEX RATE : $13.00 NT ( 1 ) MILES 190 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - mXHM $17.21 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 224 Barge $ 1.76 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 1.76 NT REMARKS: Through rail rate $16.80 NT. Rail rate constructed 77i% of present applicable rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 CO (*) BCC 21F MF ICC 195 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW+3-75-C-0067) - 107 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 84317 BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. SEAR DESTINATION Kingston Mines, Ml. BfcKXRWWXflKXC OBSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL OKXRKflWKWfflHfcATE : $14. 60 NT(2) MILES 851 ALTERNATIVE RATES: WcxkXXXWTCRKX Pipeline to St. Louis $4.24 NT(1) Rail Beyond $8.80 NT(3) Total $13.04 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER Pipeline $ 4.24 NT(1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1 84 B arge $ 1.26 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.50 NT REMARKS: Actual origin Borger, Texas. Pipeline rates include transfer into barge. Through rate is $19.80 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $11.40 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) Phillips Pipe Line Co. 32T ICC(4) (2) SWL 1250 ICC 5007 21 \s) (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 , 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) 108 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. KXXmMKXBKXC OBSTRUCTED RAIL flKXKXRKKXXKXRATE : $13.00 NT(1) TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2*tl9 BEAR DESTINATION Albany, 111 RAIL 28300 MILES 261 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - WOCKKX $20.83 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 330 Barge $ 2.22 NT TOTAL 2.22 NT REMARKS: Through rail rate $16.80 NT. Rati rate constructed 77i% of present applicable rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (2) BCC 21F Mf* ICC 195 (3) CO (5) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) !09 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5789 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. SEAR DESTINATION North Pekin, 111. KXXmXKXBXXCONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL OKXKXmXNIXRATE : $11.40 NT (2) MILES 574 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RXWLXX-XX#H)E*X Pipeline to St. Louis $1.55 NT(1) Rail Beyond $8.80 NTI, Total $10.35 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER Pipeline $ 1.55 NT(1) ; HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 179 Barge $ 1 .33 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 2.88 NT REMARKS: Actual origin Ponca City, Okla. Pipeline rates Include tranf into barge. Through rate Is $15.60 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 772% of present applicable rate $11.40 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) Continental Pipe Line Co. ICC(4) (2) SWL 1250, ICC 5007 215 (5) (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 110 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TO.JMAGE (SHORT TOWS) *+917 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. BEAR DESTINATI ON Albany, 111. KXxMXl«X»RXCONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL flRxffxmXHKXRATE : $13.00 NT ( 1 ) MILES 261 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - Wcmx $19.22 NT (2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 316 Barge $ 2.15 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 2.15 NT REMARKS: Through rail rate $16.80 NT. Rail rate constructed 772% of present applicable rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (*0 ( 2 ) BCC 21F MF ICC 195 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 , 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - Ill TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TO.JMAGE (SHORT TONS) 11128 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. SEAR DESTINATION North Pekfn, 111. RXXXXXKRXBRXCONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL RRXKXKRKXHKXRATE : $8.30 NT(1) MILES 1 51 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - WttKKX $11.61 NT (2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 179 Barge $ 1.38 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 1.38 NT REMARKS: Through rail rate $11.^+0 NT. Rail rate constructed 77i% of present applicable rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (k) (2) BCC 21F MF ICC 195 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 3 I, 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) 112 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil , Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. XKXmKKKXBIX CONSTRUCTED RAILXWKXRKRRKKMK RATE: $19.60 NT(1 TO.JilAGE (SHORT TONS) 2386 SEAR DESTINATION Minnesota River, Minn, RAIL 28300 MILES ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK -XtfXTTCIK $44.99 NT (2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 524 660 Barge 3.83 NT TOTAL 3.83 NT REMARKS: Through rail rate $25.70 NT. Rail rate constructed 77i% of present applicable rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) WTL 442C ICC A4922 ( 2 ) BCC 21F MF ICC 195 (3) (4) (5) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 113 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5828 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. BEAR DESTINATION Davenport, la. XKXXXUNEXBK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAILXBKXRXRKKXXK RATE: $11.40 NT (2) MILES 563 ALTERNATIVE RATES: XXKMHXm#W}efc Pipeline to St. Louis $1.55 NT(1) Rail Beyond $13.00 NT() Total $14.55 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER Pipeline $ 1.55 NT(1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 285 Barge $ 2.30 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 3.85 NT REMARKS :Actual origin Ponca City, Okla. Pipeline rates include translr into barge. Through rate is $15.60 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $16.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1 Continental Pipe Line Co. ICC (4) (2)SWL 125Q ICC 5007 215 (5) (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 3 I . 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) - 114 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 9362 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. BEAR DESTINATION Clinton, la. nxxjrxxxxxix constructed rail 28300 RAIL JCRX*mXX MI RATE: $11.60 NT (2) MILES 598 ALTERNATIVE RATES: mtXnmtiR Pipeline to St. Louis $1.55 NT(1) Rail Beyond $13.00 NT(3) Total $14.55 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER Pipeline $ 1.55 NT(1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 321 Barge $ 2.40 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 3.95 NT REMARKS: Actual origin Ponca City, Okla. Pipeline rates include transfer into barge. Through rate is $15.60 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $16.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (^Continental Pipeline Co. ICC CO (2) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 215 ( 5 ) ( 3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 ( 6 ) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) 115 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE A HA LYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2Z * 2 ? 8 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. KXXSXXXKXXIXX CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL ffiXttmXMXXRATE : $12.60 NT (2) MILES 6 9 8 ALTERNATIVE RATES: WkOttOMXTOft Pipeline to St. Louis $1.55 NT(1) Rail Beyond $10.00 NTH Total $11.55 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER Pipeline $ 1.55 NT(1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 338 Barge $ 2.78 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ ^.33 NT REMARKS: Actual origin Ponca City, Okla. Pipeline rates include tran : < into barge. Through rate is $17.00 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class. Rate beyond constructed 772% of present applicable rate $12.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) Continental Pipe Line Co. ICC(if) (2) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 215 (5) (3) |FA 1-107B ICC 1219 (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) 116 - TRAFFIC SURVEY KATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TO, IMAGE (SHORT TONS) 2681 BEAR ORIGIN Mount Vernon, Ind. BEAR DESTINATION Rock Island, 111. BWSJWW6XWRX CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL XBXJWmMWKX RATE: $18.20 NT ( 1 ) MILES 339 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1,50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $1 .90 NT Rail Beyond $13.00 NT (2) Total $16.40 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 634 Barge $ 3.7*+ NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 3.74 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $23.40 NT. Rate beyond constructed 772% of present applicable rate of $16.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) TL CTR 2009 ICC CI 008 (4) (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 , 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) - 117 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 22464 BEAR ORIGIN Mount Vernon, Ind. bear DESTINATION Cicero, 111, «M8flftBW)We< RATE: $15.60 NT(1) MILES 990 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $5.52 NT Rail Beyond $10.00 NT (2) Total $17.02 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1521 Barge $ 7.^1 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 7.*+l NT REMARKS: Through rate is $22.60 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class rate. Rate beyond constructed 772% of present applicable rate $12.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (*0 (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW+3-75-C-0067) 121 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 33838 BEAR ORIGIN Port Arthur, Tex. BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, Ml. mSmWXXKXCONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL MmttXmx RATE: $15.60 NT(1) MILES 990 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $5.52 NT Rail Beyond $10.00 NT (2) Total $17.02 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1515 Barge $ 7.^1 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 7.41 NT REMARKS: Through rate is $22.60 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class rate. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $12.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 SWL 1250. ICC 5007 (*+) (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 . 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) 122 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 6166 BEAR ORIGIN Port Arthur, Tex. BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. )«W8W«X>W CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL OK XtmxmL RATE: $15.60 NT(1) MILES 990 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1 .50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $5.52 NT Rail Beyond $10.00 NT(2) Total $17.02 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1515 Barge $ 7.^*1 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 7M NT REMARKS: Through rate Is $22.60. Rate constructed on basis of 8.9% of 1st Class rate. Rate beyond constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $12.80 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (4) (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) S23 T RAFFIC SURVEY RATE AM LYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TO.JflAGE (SHORT TONS) 3124 BEAR ORIGIN Cicero, 111. BEAR DESTINATION St. Louis, Mo. XWJBWXKXXXK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL XHXXWeeOWJeX RATE: $10.00 NT(1) MILES 276 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - XAW0R $23.17 NT (2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 359 Barge $ 2.69 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 2.69 NT REMARKS: Through rail rate $12.80 NT. Rail rate constructed 77i% of present applicable rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (4) (2) BCC 21F MF ICC 195 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 124 - TRA FFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1212 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, III. BEAR DESTINATION Peru » ,n - fiftWWNCKXlX CONSTRUCTED RAIL *Rx#9 NT Rail Beyond $8.40 NT(2) KA,L ,/ATtK y Total $15.39 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1^15 Barge $ 7.35 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 7.35 NT REMARKS- Rail rate constructed on basis of 9.5% of 1st Class rate. Rate beyond constructed on basis of 9.5% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 9^5 ICC S589 (k) (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 128 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 107^6 BEAR ORIGIN New Orleans, La. BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. nKXKYmxm constructed rail 28300 RA I L XOXXKKKKKXXK RATE : $15.80 NT(1) MILES 890 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $5. *+9 NT Rail Beyond $8.40 NT (2) Total $15.39 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1399 Barge $ 7.33 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 7.33 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed on basis of 9.5% of 1st Class rate. Rate beyond constructed on basis of 9.5% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SFA 9^5 ICC S589 CO ( 2 ) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 , 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) - 129 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS . n .. 58673 COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) Cicero, 111, BEAR ORIGIN Norco, La. gEAR DES T I NAT I ON )&mwmm> CONSTRUCTED ... 0n MT / n RAIL XWWmW RATE: $15 ' 8 ° NT(1) RAIL 28300 890 MILES ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT *o <;*• louis $5.3*+ NT Rail Beyond $8.M) NT(2) RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis >50 ^^ ^ ^ NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1372 Barge $ 7.33 NT TOTAL 7.33 NT »te. I ^"constructed on'oasls of 9.5% of 1st Cass rate. REMARKS: Rail constructed on basis of 9.5* * l« Class_rate.^ Rate EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 9^5 ICC S589 (k) (2) JFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) - 130 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 37107 BEAR ORIGIN Baton Rouge, La. SEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. KXmXNSXHKXCONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL BKXRXRKKXXKXRATE : $15.^0 NT(1 ) MILES 372 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $4.82 NT Rail Beyond $8.40 NT(2) Total $14.72 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Nat Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1265 Barge $ 6.90 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 6.90 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed on basis of 9.5% of 1st Class rate. Rate beyond constructed on basis of 9.5% of 1st Class rate, EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SFA 945 ICC S589 (4) (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES [Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) 131 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 12044 BEAR ORIGIN Baton Rouge, La. SEAR DESTINATION Havana, 111. tiOraSCKttXXXXK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L X)«0rcW5eU(l>We( RATE : $14.40 NT(1) MILES 763 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $4.32 NT Rail Beyond $5.80 NT (2) Total $12.12 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1068 Barge $ 5.90 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.90 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed on basis of 9.5% of 1st Class rate. Rate beyond constructed on basis of 9.5% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 945 ICC S589 (4) (2) |FA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) - 132 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS :OMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TO.JNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1422 IEAR ORIGIN Memphis, Tenn. SEAR DESTINATION Peru, 111. W06WXKXXXK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L XXKHHJOBOWJa RATE : $11.00 NT(1) MILES W >LTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $2.41 NT Rail Beyond $7.40 NT (2) Total $11.31 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton :harge TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN JNE-HAUL CHARGE 658 Barge $ 4.14 NT vwdling at river destination :harge ex river DTHER TOTAL $ 4.14 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed on basis of 9.5% of 1st Class rate. Rate beyond constructed on basis of 9.5% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 0) SFA 945 ICC S589 (4) (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 3 1 , 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) - 133 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TO.JMAGE (SHORT TONS) 7756 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. NRKKXKRXKXMK CONSTRUCTED ,. RAIL 28300 . RAIL OMMWmim RATE: $8.40 NT(1) miles 276 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK -XJGCUeW $19.31 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 341 Barge $ 2.46 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 2.46 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed on basis of 9.5% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (4) (2) BCC 21F MF ICC 195 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) 34 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TO.iNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5891 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minn. IXmXMXBKXCONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL BKXRXRKKXXKXRATE : $11.60 NT (1) MILES 524 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - WXTKKX $38.11 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 6^3 Barge $ 4.04 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.04 NT REKARKS: Rail rate constructed on basis of 9.5% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS ^) WTL 442C ICC A4922 (4) ( 2) BCC 21F MF ICC 195 (5) I (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 3 1 , 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) 135 TRA FFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN Mount Vernon, Ind. SEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. TmY&tm&Xm CONSTRUCTED a n . lX RAIL 28300 „, MiimmmmMTt: $7.80 nkd miles 232 ALTERNATIVE RATES: A „ _,„, T , r . m *, cn KIT Pipeline to Mt. Vernon $.52 NT(2) Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $1.33 NT Rail Beyond $8.40 NT(1) KAIL vWUtK y Total $12<35 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per N<*t Ton Pipeline $ .52 NT(2) 689 Barge $ 4.25 NT CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ *.77 NT REMARKS- Actual origin Lawrencevi 1 Je, 111. Rail rate constructed 9.5% Ktiwro. of lst cla | s rate> Rate beyond constructed 9.5/° of 1st Class rate. Pipeline rates include transfer Into barge. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (k) (2) Texas Pipe Line Co. ICC 1120 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 3 1 , 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 136 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1 376 BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont. Tex. BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minn, *mXKN«X«KXCONSTRUCTED RAIL SfcxRXKRMNRXRATE : Beaumont, Tex. $18.00 NT(1) RAIL 28300 MILES 1209 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1,50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $5.76 NT Rail Beyond $11.60 NT (2) Total $18.86 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les HoHe Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1825 Barge $ 8.65 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.65 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed 80% of present applicable rate of $22.60 NT. Rate beyond constructed 9.5% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (2) WTL A42C ICC A4922 (3) CO (5) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 137 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1**10 BEAR ORIGIN Texas City, Tex. BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. SMSffiWKX/flft CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L WMMMtim RATE : $ 1 7 . 80 NT ( 1 ) M I LES 1 035 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $6.09 NT Rail Beyond $8.40 NT (2) Total $15.99 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1583 Barge $ 8.07 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.07 NT REMARKS: Hail rate constructed 80% of present applicable rate $22.20 NT Rate beyond constructed 9.5% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) Slvl 1250 ICC 500/ (k) (2) |FA 1-I07B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) - 138 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 825*+ BEAR ORIGIN Texas City, Tex. SEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. BCMSTCWXXXOR'v CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL O«O08W>MG<}0B( CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L XXKHNJeetXPOBC RATE : $8.^0 NT(1) MILES 276 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - XKOODR $13. 60 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 3^ Barge $ 2.05 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 2.05 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed on basis of 9.5% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (4) (2) BCC 21F MC ICC 195 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES PONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 140 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TOrJNAGE (SHORT TONS) 48228 BEAR ORIGIN Corpus Christ! , Tex^EAR DESTINATION Havana, 111. WKDQCMXXXXXK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L XXKtfXDfleiXDWtt RATE : $17.20 NT(1) MILES 1115 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $7. 10 NT Rail Beyond $5.80 NT (2) Total $14.40 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1588 Barge $ 8.23 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.23 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed 80% of present applicable rate of $21.40 NT. Rate beyond constructed 9.5% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (4) (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 3 1 , 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) 141 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMOD I TYLubrt eating Oils, Grease TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 7^138 BEAR ORIGIN Lake Charles, La. BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. EXISTING XRXXXXKftXXJaneD RAIL 28300 RAIL mxfAXlXAm RATE: $15*80 NT(1) MILES 939 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $6.20 NT Rail Beyond $6.20 NT (2) Total $13.90 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE IW Barge $ 8.28 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.28 NT REMARKS: Rail rate beyond constructed on basis of rate from Hartford, 111 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 1250, ICC 5007 (k) (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW^ 3 -75-C-0067) 142 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Lubricating Oils, Grease TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 44889 3EAR ORIGIN Houston, Tex. BEAR DESTINATION Indiana Harbor, Ind. EXISTING JOttJOONGWWaPBCK RAIL 28300 RAIL XWMtofiBCXOWeX RATE: $15.80 NT ( 1 ) MILES 1°35 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $7.06 NT Rail Beyond $6.20 NT (2) Total $14.76 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1641 Barge $ 9.25 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 9.25 NT REMARKS: Rail rate beyond constructed on basis of rate from Hartford, 111 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 (4) ( 2 ) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 , 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) - 143 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Lubricating Oils, Grease TOJilAGE (SHORT TONS) 19414 BEAR ORIGIN Port Arthur, Tex. BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. ExisTiNGxwxK«wnaoracwax rail 28300 RAILxWCXftKG&JXWBC RATE: $15.80 NT(1) MILES 990 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $6. 45 NT Rail Beyond $6.20 NT (2) Total $14.15 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE '521 Barge $ 8.42 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.42 NT REMARKS: Rail rate beyond constructed on basis of rate from Hartford, 111 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 (4) (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) 144 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMOD I TYLubri eating Oils, Grease TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 16103 BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Tex. SEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minn. XXXSWXWCXK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I UXIXXMfflBUUME RATE: $17.20 NT(1) MILES 1209 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $6.45 NT Rail Beyond $15.20 NT (2) Total $23.15 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 181 8 Barge $ 9.53 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 9.53 NT REMARKS: Through rail rate Is $27.00 NT. Rate constructed on basis of 8.7% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (4) (2) l/TL 2000 J ICC A4669 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 , 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) 1^5 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Lubricating Oils, GreaseTONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2040 BEAR ORIGIN Indiana Harbor, Ind. sear DESTINATION Galena Park, Tex. KXXXXKKKXKK CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L OXXKXKKKXiXK RATE : $15.80 NT(l) MILES 1035 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $6,20 NT (2) Barge Beyond $5.51 NT Total $13.21 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1768 Barge $ 7.75 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 7.75 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed on basis of existing rate in reverse direction. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 113-1 ICC 5137 (4) (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 , 1975 (DACW+3-75-C-0067) - 146 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Lubricating Oils, Grease TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 7212 BEAR ORIGIN Indiana Harbor, Ind. BEAR DESTINATION Hartford, 111. EXISTING XXmXJSWHXXDGCX RAIL 28300 RAILjOtofflMfciXDO&RATE: $6.20 NT(1) MILES 276 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - MWM $20.29 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 356 Barge $ 2.75 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 2.75 NT REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (k) (2) BCC 21 F HF ICC 195 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 , 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) 1*7 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Aliphatic Naptha TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5#*7 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. SEAR DESTINATION Indiana Harbor, Ind. mmxxxxwx CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL »RX*XmXX!IXRATE: $9.80 NT(1) MILES 2 7 6 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - MXER $15.57 NT (2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 356 Barge $ 2.88 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 2.88 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed 77s% of present applicable rate $12.60 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 CO (2) BCC 28 MF ICC 28 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES RONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-0067) 148 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Aliphatic Naptha TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 7#+7 BEAR ORIGIN Houston, Tex. BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. EXISTINGxtoXK^TWKKXWX RAIL 28300 RAILxflftxftkK&IXkfXfc RATE: $16.20 NT(1) MILES 1035 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $6.60 NT Rail Beyond $9.80 NT(2) Total $17.90 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1623 Barge $ 8.22 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.22 NT REMARKS: R a i 1 beyond rate constructed 77i% of present applicable rate $12.60 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS W SWL 1250. ICC 5007 (**) (2 > IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) j (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES »«.: March 31, 1975 (DACV.3-75-C-0067) 11*9 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Aliphatic Naptha TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) ]0 ^ BEAR ORIGIN Kenova, W. Va. BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. )«W>®aXDMGOOft CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L XXKtfXDfieiXDNt RATE : $16.80NT(1) MILES W2 ALTERNATIVE RATES: M _ .. _. M _ Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $4.76 NT Rail Beyond $9.80 NT (2) Total $16.06 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1200 Bar 9 e $ 6 ' 9 ° NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 6.90 NT REMARKS: Rail rate published from Catlettsburg, Ky. Rail beyond rate constructed on basis of 77i% of present applicable rate $12. 6C NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) TL CTR E2009 CO (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 150 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Aliphatic Naptha TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 181 36 BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Tex. SEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. EXISTING OKXKaKXlWKffXKK RAIL 28300 RAILXOKXRKKKKKMK RATE: $16.20 NT(1) MILES 990 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $5.99 NT Rail Beyond $9.80 NT(2) Total $17.29 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1516 Barge $ 8.22 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.22 NT REMARKS: Rail beyond rate constructed 77a% of present applicable rate $12.60 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (k) (2) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES PONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 , 1975 CRI&P 26061W ICC C14023 ^ (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW+3-75-C-0067) - 159 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Building Cement TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 36277 BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. BEAR DESTINATION Pekin, 111. XXXSJWMSXXKX CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL »RX*mXMXGEXRATE: $5.00 NT(1) MILES 151 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - 'WATER TRUCK - mXlK $10.00 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate par Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 193 Barge $ 1 .48 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ l .48 NT REMARKS: ^ ate constructed on basis of average percentage relatlonshli to 1st Class of 7.2% 150,000 pounds per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS ( ] ) WTL 132N ICC A4633 (*♦) W Truck Transport MF ICC 35 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 , 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) 160 T RAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Building Cement TO.JHAGE (SHORT TONS) 66709 BEAR ORIGIN Vermillion River, I 1 1 . SEAR DESTINATION St. Louis, Mo. X»tmM6XX»X CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL »Rxtfmxa»*XRATE: $5.60 NT(1) MILES 209 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER truck - warn $13.3^ NT (2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 259 Barge $ 1.62 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 1.62 NT /eraqe percent* to 1st Class of 7.2%, 150,000 pounds per car, REMARKS: Rate constructed on basis of average percentage relationship id: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1 ) WTL 132N ICC A4638 (*0 (2) Truck Transport MF ICC #2 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES TONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 161 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY 3uilding Cement TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 141983 BEAR ORIGIN Clarksville, Mo. BEAR DESTINATION Nashville, Tenn. EXISTING XlBXXXIMQWOOCWfiK RAIL 28300 RAIL XKXJBUflEBWJEX RATE: $9.00 MT(1) MILES 408 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.25 NT RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $4.20 NT Barge Beyond $2.82 NT Total $8.27 NT TRUCK - MXBL To St. Louis $5.48 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 525 Barge $ 3.58 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 3.58 NT REMARKS: Rail to St. Louis constructed on average of 7.2% of 1st Clas rate, 150,000 pounds per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) TL CTR C/S 449N ICC C970 (i+) (2) Truck Transport MF ICC 52 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) 162 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Building Cement TOrJMAGE (SHORT TONS) 85449 BEAR ORIGIN Clarksville, Mo. SE ar DESTINATION Galveston, Tex. )QM&MM)m CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L X)ROflm To St. Louis $5.48 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1145 Barge $ 4.42 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ kMl NT REMARKS: Rail to St. Louis constructed on average of 7.2% of 1st Class rate, 150,000 pounds per car. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 TL CTR C/S 449N ICC C970 (4) (2) Truck Transport MF ICC 52 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 164 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Building Cement BEAR ORIGIN Hannibal, Mo. TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 131 100 SEAR DESTINATION St - Louis, Mo. RAIL 28300 XXXSWXfcXXKX CONSTRUCTED RAIL »XX*MX?XIMXlXXRATE: $^.20 NT(l) MILES ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - WKXKKX $7.86 NT(2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) 118 Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 129 Barge Rate per Net Ton 1.20 NT TOTAL 1.20 NT REMARKS- Rate constructed on basis of average percentage relationship to 1st Class of 7.2%, 150,000 pounds per car. Through rate is $5.00 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) WTL 132 ICC A4638 (/+) (2) Truck Transport MF ICC 52 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 165 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Dry Sulphur TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1971 ° BEAR ORIGIN LaFourche, La. 8EAR DESTINATION Marseilles, 111. EXISTING BRXKBHXXKMKXKtt RAIL 28300 RAIL WCXRXRRKXHK RATE: $20.20 NT(l) MILES 946 ALTERNATIVE RATES: * «. .- Transfer Charge $ .75 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $4.49 NT Rail Beyond $7.20 NT(2) Total $12.44 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1356 Barge $ 5.74 NT TOTAL $ 5.74 NT REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 102A ICC 5077 (4) (2) IFA I-33H ICC 1123 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) 166 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Dry Sulphur BEAR ORIGIN Joliet, 111 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 12035 BEAR DESTINATION St. Louis, Mo. RAIL 28300 IBRMMMXKXXXK CONSTRUCTED RAIL ORXmraOWKX RATE : $7.20 NT(1) MILES ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) 276 Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 326 Barge Rate per Net Ton 2.49 NT TOTAL 2.^9 NT REMARKS: Constructed rate based on published rate in reverse direction, Existing rail rate $11.80 NT(1). EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS :o IFA I-33H ICC 1123 CO \D (5) 3) (6) ite: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 167 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Iron and Steel Scrap TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 717 BEAR ORIGIN Paducah, Ky. BEAR DESTINATION Alton, 111. existing xjwocowewuwetK RAIL 28300 RA I L X*9O0q)00lXl5M# RATE : $5.82 NT(1) MILES 167 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - XJNTCXX Truck Mileage 191 $11.80 NT (3) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 243 Barge $ 2.46 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 2.46 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate applies on shipment of 500,000 pounds. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) I FA I-40J ICC A4940 (if) (2) WFB 8B ICC 40 (5) (3) MCTB 36G MF ICC 263 (6) CHARLES PONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 , 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 168 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Iron and Steel Scrap TOiJMAGE (SHORT TONS) ^871 BEAR ORIGIN Davenport, la. BEAR DESTINATION St - Louis, Mo. EXISTING OKXK»NX*XXjXraX RAIL 28300 RAIL MXmiXXNKXRATE : $8.39 NT(1) MILES 230 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - Mm* $12.20 NT(3) RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 302 Barge $ 2.59 NT(2) HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL 2.59 NT REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS I (1) BN 169 ICC 104 (k) (2) WFB 8B ICC 40 (5) 1 (3) MCTB 36G MF ICC 263 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 169 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Iron and Steel Scrap TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 8777 BEAR ORIGIN Chicago, 111. BEAR DESTINATION Guntersville, Ala. EXISTING XmSXWBJnUKX&X RAIL 28300 RAIL X»lX*X*m XXX RATE: $11.76 NT(1) MILES 697 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer charge $1.70 NT RAIL - WATER $6.19 NT (5) to E. St. Louis Beyond Barge $5.60 NT (2) Total $17.83 NT XK8XKXX-XKXXKK Rail Beyond Guntersville $3.00 NT(4) Plus handling at river $1.3^ NT(3) Total RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 9^9 Barge $ 5.72 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION $ 1.3** NT (3) CHARGE EX RIVER 50 Rail $ 3.00 NT(*0 OTHER TOTAL $ 10.06 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate subject to minimum of 500,000 pounds per shipment. Rail rate beyond river subject to minimum of 500,000 pounds per shipment. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) WTL l/S 7^K ICC 1199 C+) SFA 2^3-0 ICC SI 091 (2) WFB 8B ICC kO (5) IFA I-33H ICC 1123 (3) Quotation Mr. Connors - Port (6) of Guntersvi 1 le Date: March 31 , 1975 - 170 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW+3-75-C-0067) TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Castings and Foigings TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN South Chicago, 111. 3EAR DESTINATION Granite City, 111. EXISTING mYMffl$l[m&N& RAIL 28300 RA I L OTCXKKKKKKKB RATE : $13.20 NT ( 1 ) MILES 276 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - \mm $12.60 NT (3) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 362 Barge $ 4.38 NT(2) TOTAL $ 4.38 NT REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) !FA 82C ICC 1087 (4) (2) WFB 8B ICC kO (5) I (3) Illinois Intra-State 1160E (6) MF ILL 163 Date: March 31 , 1975 - 171 - CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Castings and Forgings TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3559 BEAR ORIGIN Gary, Ind. SEAR DESTINATION Houston, Tex. EX I ST I NG }0BC)O(gn9(IOCMg(K9(X RAIL 28300 RAILtfftxftW^MJfiCRATE: $27.73 NT(1) MILES 1035 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER $13.20 NT(3) to St. Louis Mo. Barge $9.82 NT(2) Total $24.52 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE I768 Barge $ 11.50 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ n ,50 NT REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 301 E ICC 5098 (k) (2) WFB 8B ICC kO (5) (3) I FA 82C ICC 1087 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 172 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Steel Mill Products TO.JilAGE (SHORT TONS) 3181 BEAR ORIGIN Gary, Ind. SEAR DESTINATION Houston, Tex. EXISTING ORxRftMSXMRXRRX RAIL 28300 RAIL MJcRfckXNRxRATE : $17.00 NT (1) MILES 1035 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge$2.52 NT RAIL - WATER $11.92 NT(3) to St. Louis Beyond Barge $9.82 NT(2) Total$24.26 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Nat Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1771 Barge $ 11.50 NT(2) HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 11.50 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate applies on shipment of 420,000 pounds. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 301 E ICC 5093 CO (2) WFB 8B ICC kO (5) (3) IFA I-82C ICC 1087 (6) j)ate: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES PONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 173 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Steel Mill Products TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) W8 BEAR ORIGIN South Chicago, 111. BEAR DESTINATION! St. Louis, Mo. EXISTING »RxS»N85TR»m8X RA I L flKxWmXNKXRATE : $ 1 1 . 92 NT ( 1 ) RAIL 28300 MILES 276 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - WflRRX $12.60 NT(3) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS: Mi les 3^0 lode Barge TOTAL Rate per Net Ton k. 38 NT(2) 4.38 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) I FA I-82C ICC 1087 CO U) WFB 8B ICC kQ (5) (3) MCTB 36G MF ICC 263 (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES PONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACV+3-75-C-0067) - ]Jk - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Steel Mill Products TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1 807 BEAR ORIGIN Gary, Ind. SEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, La. EXISTING lOMXm&WIWaVEM RAIL 28300 RAIL XRXfltmMCEX RATE: $17.88 NT(1) MILES 890 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $2.52 NT RAIL - WATER $11.92 NT(3) to St. Louis Beyond Barge $6.44 NT(2) Total $20.80 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les iiorle Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1407 Barge $ 8.66 NT(2) HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.66 NT REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) IFA l/S 108-1 ICC 1315 (*0 (2) WFB 8B ICC kO (5) (3) |FA 1-82-C ICC 1087 (6) (Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 175 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Iron and Steel Products TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 27701 BEAR ORIGIN South Chicago, 111. gEAR DESTINATION Houston, Tex. EXISTING dWttMWWWWC , % RAIL 28300 RAIL (WWmXpM* RATE : $17.52 NT(1) MILES 1035 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.70 NT RAIL - WATER $11.92 NT(3) to St. Louis Beyond Barge $9.82 NT(2) Total $23.44 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1757 Barge $ 11.50 NT(2) HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 11.50 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate subject to minimum 896 NT per shipment. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (U SWL 301 E ICC 5098 (4) (2) WFB 8B ICC kO (5) (3) IFA 82C ICC 1087 (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-0067) 176 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Iron Ore Concentrates TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 165090 BEAR ORIGIN Burns ide, La. SEAR DESTINATION Indiana Harbor, Ind, RAIL 28300 existing mwmmwiwx RAIL OKXKKHKKKKKfcATE : $9.66 NT(1) MILES 919 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.00 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $3.70 NT Rail Beyond $5.31 NT(2) Total $10.01 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 13^7 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Barge TOTAL 5.14 NT 5.14 NT REMARKS (1) 1(2) (3) EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS SP FFC 1021L ICC 238 (if) MP 29D ICC 576 (5) (6) )ate: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 177 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Iron Ore Concentrates TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5717 BEAR ORIGIN BurnsHe, La. SEAR DESTINATION Calumet Harbor, 111 EXISTING 8RX*»XSm!m»X RAIL 28300 RAIL JBRXKXmXHIXRATE : $9.66 NT(1) MILES 919 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.00 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $3.70 NT Rail Beyond $5.31 NT(2) Total $10.01 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE I336 Barge $ k.9k NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ k.Sk NT REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 SP FFC 1021L ICC 238 (4) (2) MP 29D ICC 576 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 3 1 , 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) 178 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Manganese TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) ,2 57 BEAR ORIGIN Burnside, La. BEAR DESTINATION South Chicago, 111 EXISTING ow>ows>wuwe6K RAIL (WWWBDWe* RATE : $16.01 NT(1) RAIL 28300 MILES 919 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.25 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $3.73 NT Rail Beyond $11.04 NT Total $16.02 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 3*+0 Barge 5.19 NT CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5J9 NT REMARKS: Rail beyond constructed on basis 12.5% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SP FCC 1021L ICC 238 CO (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 179 TRAFFIC SURVEY KATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Manganese TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1243 BEAR ORIGIN Pittsburgh, Pa. BEAR DESTINATION G ar Y. Ind. KXKXJKKIXXOR CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL OKXRKRKKXaKXRATE : $14.32 NT(1) MILES ^54 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.25 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $4.83 NT Rail Beyond $11.04 NT Total $17.12 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) M' les MoHe Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1542 Barge $ 6.53 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 6.53 NT REMARKS: *ail beyond constructed on basis 12.5% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) TL CTR E2009-I ICC CI 008 (4) (2) (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1 975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) 180 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Pig Iron TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1586 BEAR ORIGIN Sheffield, A4a. SEAR DESTINATION Calumet Harbor, Ml. BKlOCKWSXXaXXCONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RA I L OXXKKKKKKXaC RATE : $11.85 NT MILES 564 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $3.62 NT Rail Beyond $9.21 NT(2) Total $14.33 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 852 Barge $ 6.54 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 6.54 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate Is $16.13 NT(1). Constructed rate made 9.2% of 1st Class related to 2-car rate from Birmingham to St. Louis, Mo. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 SFA 18Q ICC S319 (4) ;(2) IFA I-33H ICC 1123 (5) (3) (6) (Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 181 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Pig Iron TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 9*92 BEAR ORIGIN Sheffield, Ale. BEAR DESTINATION Calumet Harbor, 111 ftMBN*Kk)QftC CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL Oj&ocMfcWWEX RATE : $11.85 NT(1) MILES 5W ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.50 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $3.62 NT Rail Beyond $9.21 NT(2) Total $14.33 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les HoHe Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 852 Barge $ 6.54 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 6.54 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate is $16.13 NT(1). Constructed rate made 9.2% of 1st Class related to 2-car rate from Birmingham to St. Louis, Mo. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 18Q ICC S-319 (4) (2) | FA I-33H ICC 1123 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 182 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY industrial Chemicals TO.JilAGE (SHORT TONS) 99467 BEAR ORIGIN Lake Charles, La. SEAR DESTINATION Joliet, 111. EXISTINGxRRxRRNXX"RMKXRD RAIL 28300 RAILxtoxRxRRktttE RATE: $23.60 MT(1) MILES 939 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ .79 NT RAIL - WATERBarge to St. Louis $5.93 NT Rail Beyond $12.10 NT Total $18.82 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1^52 Bai y* $ 7.82 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 7.82 NT REMARKS :Rail beyond constructed on basis 89.5% of present applicable rate of $13.60 NT(2). EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (OSWL SWA/ 2006J ICC 5056 (*0 (2) I FA 2002T ICC 1287 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 183 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2 ** 31 BEAR ORIGIN Lake Charles, La. BEAR DESTINATION Jo,let » ,n « EXISTING XWXXWSJWWWB& /x RAIL 28300 Mt% RAIL XXXMWMm RATE: $23.60 NT-(l) MILES 939 ALTERNATIVE RATES: „ - r . * -, Q m- Transfer Charge $ .79 NT ram uatfr Barge to St. Louis $5.93 NT Rail Beyond $12.10 NT RAIL - WATER Total $l8<8 2 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE ]k52 Barge $ 7 ' 82 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 7.82 NT REMARKS- Rai1 beyond constructed on basis 89.5% of present applicable rate of $13.60 NT(2). EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL SW/W 2006 J ICC 5056 ^j (2) I FA I-2002T ICC 1237 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 184 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals TO.IilAGE (SHORT TONS) 52320 BEAR ORIGIN Deer Park, Tex. SEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. EXISTING »m»Xm»mB RAIL 28300 RAILxflRxmmWK RATE: $25.60 NT(1) MILES 1035 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ .79 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $6.65 NT Rail Beyond $12.10 NT Total $19.5^ NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1614 Barge $ 8.62 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.62 NT REMARKS: Rail rate constructed on basis 89.5% of present applicable rate of $13.60 NT(2). EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SWL SW/V/ 2006 J ICC 5056 (h) ( 2 ) I FA 2002T ICC 1287 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31 , 1975 Bar 9 e $ 3 ' 98 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 3.98 NT REMARKS: Existing and rate beyond based on annual volume of 36,000 NT, 5 cars or more per shipment. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 273F ICC kSk\ (k) (2) I FA I-2002T ICC 1287 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 189 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 55000 Am. Cyanimld BEAR ORIGIN Fortier Pit., La. BEAR DESTINATION Hannibal, Mo. EXISTINGxfflXflWaJWMKTM RAIL 28300 RAIL mttmtM RATE: $13.00 NT (1) MILES 811 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.96 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $5.78 NT Rail Beyond $**.85 NT (2) Total $12.59 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE UkQ Barge $ 7.^1 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 7 A] NT REMARKS: Existing and rate beyond based on annual volume of 36,000 NT, 5 cars or more per shipment. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SWL 273F ICC k$k] (*0 (2) I FA I-2002T ICC 1287 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 190 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Sodium Hydroxide TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 150I6 BEAR ORIGIN Gelsmar, La. SEAR DESTINATION Chicago, 111. EXISTING X^^mOOiiMXKMP RAIL 28300 RAIL^XftKSBJXWtf RATE: $22.20 Nl(l) MILES 872 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ .79 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $5.07 NT Rail Beyond $12.10 NT Total $17.96 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1315 Barge $ 7.10 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 7.10 NT REMARKS Rail rate beyond constructed on basis 89.5% of present applicable rate of $13.60 NT(2). EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) I FA 2003R ICC 1277 (*0 U) I FA I-2002T ICC 1287 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 191 - TRAFFIC SURVEY Coal Tar, RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Chemical Products BEAR ORIGIN Deer Park, Tex. TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5^79 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. RAIL 28300 $17.80 NT(1) MILES 103! EXISTING OKXXJMWXXKHieOX RA I L XKXXKmXXKX RATE : ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.25 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $7.04 NT Rail Beyond $10.20 NT (2 Total $18.49 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1614 Barge $ HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 9.06 NT REMARKS: TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 9.06 NT (0 SWL 1250. ICC 5007 (4) (2) |FA I-107B ICC 1219 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 192 TRAFFIC SURVEY KATE ANALYSIS Coal Tar, COMMODITY Chemical Products TOrJMAGE (SHORT TONS) 17^8 BEAR ORIGIN N ew Orleans, La. BEAR DESTINATION Jollet, 111. EXISTING (&XOW)0OWEX RATE : $ 1 1 . 77 NT(1) MILES 811 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ .85 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $3.07 Rail Beyond $3.93 NT (2) Total $7.85 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1119 Barge $ ^.10 NT TOTAL $ MO NT REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA S/l 883B ICC S800 {k) (2) | FA I-2002T ICC 1237 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 202 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Phosphate Rock TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 115305 BEAR ORIGIN Tampa, Fla. BEAR DESTINATION Joliet, 111. EXISTING OKXKQUmKMflrKKIX RAIL 28300 RA I L XflXXRKKKKKXK RATE : $12.24 NT(1) MILES 1205 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ .85 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $6.53 NT Rail Beyond $8.05 NT (2) Total $15.^8 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 41 Rail $ 1.91 NT HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1346 Barge $ 7.41 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 9.32 NT REMARKS: Charge to river includes loading into barge. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 SFA 876C ICC S1033 (**) (2) I FA I-200T ICC 1287 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 203 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Fertilizer & TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 33600 Fertilizer Mat. BEAR ORIGIN Cicero, 111. BEAR DESTINATION Tampa Harbor, Fla. «W3W)0MCkX» CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL)G&)ft)fl&W)W: RATE: $19.5^ NT (1) Ml LES ng9 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1 .00 NT RAIL - WATER Rail to St. Louis $3.29 NT (2) Barge Beyond $ 5.97 NT Total $15.26 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1072 Barge $ 7.41 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 7.41 NT P F MA P \t C • Rail rate constructed on basis of rates In reverse direction. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 SFA 853-1 ICC S1135 (*0 (2) |FA I-2002T ICC 1287 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 3 1 . 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 204 - TRAFFIC SURVEY KATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Nitrogenous Fertilizer TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 22155 BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. SEAR DESTINATION Calumet Harbor, Ml EXISTING RftxRMmMftXRK RAIL RftxRxRWCXNRXRATE : $11.7** NT(1) RAIL 28300 MILES 276 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - tiOOBRC $23.30 NT (2) RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 484 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Barge 2.84 NT REMARKS TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 2.84 NT (0 IFA 2002T ICC 1287 (4) (2) BCC 1009 MF ICC 181 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31, 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 205 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Superphosphate TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1240 BEAR ORIGIN New Orleans, La. BEAR DESTI NAT I ON South Chicago, 111 EXISTING X)R()00M5M»OCTC»( RAIL 28300 RA I L mtfitfflMM RATE : $13.11 NT(1) MILES 890 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.00 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $3.52 NT Rail Beyond $6.93 NT(2) Total $11.45 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1410 Barge $ 5.19 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.19 NT REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 840-1 ICC SI 140 (4) (2) I FA I-2002T ICC 1287 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 206 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE AM LYSIS COMMODITY Superphosphate TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) ** 161 BEAR ORIGIN Harlem, La. SEAR DESTINATION St - Paul » M ' nn * EXISTIMGXOTKXaafJQCmMQCrvfiOC RAIL 28300 RA I L MfXXKKBHKKKK RATE : $16.20 NT(1) MILES 1210 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.00 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $3.66 NT Rail Beyond $10.11 NT Total $14.77 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per N<*t Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1 7^5 Barge $ 5.77 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 5.77 NT REMARKS: Rail beyond constructed same scale as in I FA Tariff I-2002T ICC 1287. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 840-1 ICC S1140 CO (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 207 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Superphosphate BEAR ORIGIN Florence, Ala, existing mxKonsciKQO&D RA I L ttftXKKMHXKXEK RATE : $9.58 NT(1) TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2990 SEAR DESTINATION Palmyra, Mo. RAIL 28300 MILES 513 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.00 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $3.01 NT Rail Beyond $3.98 NT Total $7.99 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Miles 625 loHe Barge Rate per Net Ton 3.96 NT TOTAL 3.96 NT REMARKS: Rail beyond constructed same scale as in I FA Tariff I-2002T ICC 1287. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 8^0-1 ICC SI 140 CO (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 208 TRAFFIC SURVEY KATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Fertilizers - NEC TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 38514 BEAR ORIGIN Houston, Tex. SEAR DESTINATION Channahan, 111. ExisTiNGxaimaimiXMetfBX rail 28300 RA I L XflffcxKkRRtXkNR RATE : $16.53 NT(1) MILES 1006 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.00 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $5.42 NT Rail Beyond $7.15 NT(2) Total $13.57 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les iiorle Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1534 Barge $ 6.83 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 6.83 NT REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 273F ICC 4941 (4) (2) I FA I-2002T ICC 1287 (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 209 - T RAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Sugar TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1^6432 BEAR ORIGIN Burnside, La. SEAR DESTINATION Chicago, 111. EXISTING XRXEKNmXJCrXS RAIL 28300 RAIL JWXMHHOIWEXRATE: $18.40 NT(1) MILES 919 ALTERNATIVE RATES: ^ c _ . , ,_ M _ Transfer Charge $ 1.75 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $5.88 NT Rail Beyond $10.60 NT Total $18.23 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1339 Barge $ 8.63 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.63 NT REMARKS: Rail beyond rate constructed 12.1% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 925C ICC S1213 CO (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 210 TRAFFIC SU RVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Sugar TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 24616 BEAR ORIGIN Albania, La. BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, 111. EXISTINGXCWXKflBXSrWlMWTvBIX RAIL 28300 RAILXQBCXKKKKKKiXK RATE: $18.40 NT(1) MILES 947 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ 1.75 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $7.08 NT Rail Beyond $10.60 NT Total $19.43 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1542 Barge $ 8.84 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 8.84 NT REMARKS: Rail beyond rate constructed 12.1% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 925 C ICC S1213 (4) (2) (5) (3) (6) ite: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 211 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Non-Metallic Minerals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 9*+6l BEAR ORIGIN Brownsville, Tex. BEAR DESTINATION South Cicero, 111. EXISTING »XXXXDTCm£Cm>X RAIL 28300 RAIL XRX*X*EXXXIXXRATE: $20.15 NT(1) MILES 139^ ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $1.25 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $7.31 NT Rail Beyond $9.09 NT(2) Total $17.65 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE '926 Barge $ 9.11 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 9.11 NT REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 35^C ICC 5084 (/*) (2) B&O 381 E ICC 25079 (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 3 1 , 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 212 - TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Salt TOiJHAGE (SHORT TONS) 58063 BEAR ORIGIN Jefferson Island, La. BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, 111. OW WW WeCXJftX CONSTRUCTED RA I L XRX)01)00O1X!XX RATE : $13.36 NT RAIL 28300 MILES 986 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ .85 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $3.41 Rail Beyond $8.31 NT Total $12.57 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Nqt Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1379 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Barge 5.15 NT TOTAL 5.15 NT REMARKS: Constructed rail rate applies on 600 NT per shipment, 200M per car. Basis 7.6% of 1st Class rate. Existing rail rate $14.72 NT(1). Rail beyond constructed on basis 9.4% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 109G ICC 4461 (4) (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 213 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Salt TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 7914 BEAR ORIGIN Jefferson Island, La. SEAR DESTINATION Dubuque, la. J«to8o6 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER T0TAL $ 5.06 NT REMARKS: Constructed rail rate applies on 600 NT per shipment 2Q0M per car. Basis 7.6% of 1st Class rate. Existing rail rate $14.72 NT(1). Rail beyond constructed on basis S.k% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 109G ICC Wl CO (2) (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 219 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Salt TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 68461 BEAR ORIGIN Cote Blanche, La. SEAR DESTINATION Dolton, 111. fcX*XX"XN8X«KXC0NSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAIL RKxRXKKKXNKXRATE : $13.36 NT MILES 986 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ .85 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $3.41 NT Rail Beyond $8.31 NT Total $12.57 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1412 Barge $ 4.92 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 4.92 NT REMARKS: Constructed rail rate applies on 600 NT per shipment 200M per car. Basis 7.6% of 1st Class rate. Existing rail rate $14.72 NT(1). Rail beyond constructed on basis 9.4% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 109G ICC 4461 (4) (2) (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: March 31, 1975 (DACW4 3 -75-C-006 7 ) - 220 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Inedible Molasses TO.JMAGE (SHORT TONS) 3815 BEAR ORIGIN Mew Orleans, La. SEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. existing fiKxeaotmucTCKK RAIL 28300 RA I L WKXMRRDCkXR RATE : $15.60 NT(1) MILES 390 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Transfer Charge $ .85 NT RAIL - WATER Barge to St. Louis $4.59 NT Rail Beyond $10.20 NT Total $15.64 NT TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1399 3arge $ 6.20 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 6.20 NT REMARKS: Rail beyond rate constructed on basis of 11.6% of 1st Class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SFA 9^7B ICC SI 131 CO (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 - 221 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Lime TO.JilAGE (SHORT TONS) 11027 BEAR ORIGIN Ste. Genevieve, no. BEAR DESTINATION Calumet Harbor, 111 existing MXK»NK*X8**S8 rail 28300 RAIL KKXMMSMMSXrate : $8.3^ NT (1) MILES 32** ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE k22 Bar 9 e $ 2 '37 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL ? 2 -" MT REMARKS: Existing rail rate applies on annual volume of 50,000 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) TL CTR 767J ICC C 96^ (if) (2) (5) (3) (6) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES Date: Mareh 31 , 1975 (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 222 - TRAF FIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Lime TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) ^53967 BEAR ORIGIN Ste. Genevieve, h'o. g^AR DESTI NATI ON Calumet Harbor, 111 EXISTING «Mfl8WW»Pfl0& RAIL 28300 RAIL WX*)«»6^W6 RATE: $3.3*+ NT (1) MILES 324 ALTERNATIVE RATES: RAIL - WATER TRUCK - WATER RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE ^22 Barge $ 2.37 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL $ 2.37 NT REMARKS: Existing rail rate applies on annual volume of 50,000 NT. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) TL CTR 767 J ICC C 36k CO (2) (5) (3) (6) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 223 TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Benzol and Benzene T0.1MAGE (SHORT TONS) 5829 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, 111. BEAR DESTINATION Dolton, 111. KXK**KKKX«K CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 RAILX8KXKXKB{W^WW8Kt% RAIL 28300 RAILXQ«(X|XKl5«^r Net Ton $ 7.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT 4.50 NT 1.50 NT 8.68 NT (3) $23.38 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 (?) SWL 52E ICC 5008 Date: March 31 , 1975 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (4) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) SI SUPPLEHENTAL TR AFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Jet Fuel BEAR ORIGIN Atreco, Texas XXXSJDtXK XJR CONSTRUCTED ALL-RAIL RATE: $15.60 ALL-V.'ATER RATE: $7.34 ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2059 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, II RAIL 28300 NT (1) MILES 990 NT V/ATER MILES 1700 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 199 Rail $ 7.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT 1321 Barge 5.68 NT TOTAL Miles Mode 199 Rail 957 Barge 276 Rail TOTAL $14.38 NT Rate r>er Net Ton $ 7.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT 4.12 NT 1.50 NT 10.60 NT (3) $24.92 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (?) SWL 52 E ICC 5008 (4) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - S2 - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY ;ATE AfiALYS IS COMMODITY Kerosene BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Texas TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2392 BEAR DESTINATION Bettendorf, la, m%mxxm constructed ALL-RAIL RATE: $15.^0 NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 970 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 6.60 NT WATER MILES 1^73 ALTERNATIVE RATES Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 199 Rail $ 7.20 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1273 Barge 5.60 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER TOTAL $14.30 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 199 Rail $ 7.20 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 957 Barge 4.21 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION 1.50 NT CHARGE EX RIVER 230 Rail TOTAL 8.68 NT (3) $23.09 NT REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 P) SWL 52E ICC 5008 (k) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S3 S UPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE AFJALYS IS COMMODITY Kerosene BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Texas SXJUMHQPJNl CONSTRUCTED ALL- RAIL RATE: ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 4827 BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minn, RAIL 28300 $17.60 NT (1) MILES 1209 $ 8.60 NT WATER MILES 182 3 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 119 Rail $ 7.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT 1623 Barge 7.63 NT TOTAL Mfles Mode 119 Rail 957 Barge 524 Rail TOTAL $16.33 NT Rate per Net Ton $ 7.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT 4.50 NT 1.50 NT 12.00 NT (3) $26.70 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 (?) SWL 52E ICC 5008 Date: March 31 , 1975 (3) WTL 442 C ICC A4922 (4) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S4 SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE AriALYS IS COMMODITY Kerosene BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Texas mmH«X&K CONSTRUCTED TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 111+10 BEAR DESTINATION Black River, Wise, RAIL 28300 ALL-RAIL RATE: $17.20 NT (1) MILES 1169 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 8.05 NT WATER MILES 1679 ALTERNATIVE RATES Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 199 Rail $ 7.20 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1484 Barge 6.97 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER TOTAL $15.67 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 199 Rail $ 7.20 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 957 Barge 4.50 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION 1.50 NT CHARGE EX RIVER 428 Rail TOTAL 11.40 NT (3) $26.10 NT REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 125Q ICC 5S07 (2) SWL 52E ICC 5008 Date: March 31, 1975 (3) WTL 442C ICC A4922 (4) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S5 - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYS IS COMMODITY Kerosene BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Texas XKXXmN«XgR CONSTRUCTED ALL-RAIL RATE: ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3637 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, II $15.60 NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 990 $ 7.99 NT WATER MILES 1521 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 199 Rail $ 7.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT 1321 Barge 6.87 NT TOTAL Miles Mode 199 Rail 957 Barge 276 Rail TOTAL $15.57 NT Rate per Net Ton $ 7.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT 4.98 NT 1.50 NT 10.60 NT (3) $25.78 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (?) SWL 52E ICC 5008 (k) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - S6 - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Texas TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 12 9 2 BEAR DESTINATION LaG range, Mo. XXXSHNKXftX CONSTRUCTED ALL-RAIL RATE: $14.80 NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 912 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 6.40 NT WATER MILES 1 3 22 ALTERNATIVE RATES Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 199 Rail $ 6.80 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER OR GIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1122 Barge 5.39 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER TOTAL $13.69 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: Miles Mode Rate r^er Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 199 Rail $ 6.80 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS : 957 Barge 172 Ral TOTAL 1.50 NT 4.59 NT 1.50 NT 12.20 NT (3) $26.59 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 U) SV/L 52 E ICC 5008 Date: March 31, 1975 (3) CO IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - S7 - SUPPLEi .EI.'TAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE Af'ALYS IS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel O f l BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Texas TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5264 BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minn. KXXXXXKKXBR CONSTRUCTED ALL-RAIL RATE: $17.60 NT 03 RAIL 28300 MILES 1209 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 3.65 NT WATER MILES 1323 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 199 Rail $ 6.30 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1623 Barge 7.79 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER TOTAL $16.09 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 199 Rail $ 6.80 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 957 Barge 4.59 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION 1.50 NT CHARGE EX RIVER 524 Rail TOTAL 19.60 NT (3) $33.99 NT REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 CO SWL 52E ICC 5008 Date: March 31 , 1975 (3) WTL 442C ICC A 4922 (4) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - SI SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1 0600 BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Texas BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, Ml EKMXTXraSXXlXX CONSTRUCTED ALL-RAIL RATE: $15.60 NT (1) ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: $ 7M NT Miles 199 1321 TOTAL Miles Mode 199 Rail 957 Barge 276 Rail TOTAL RAIL 28300 MILES 990 WATER MILES 1 521 Mode Rate per Net Ton Rail $ 6.80 NT (2) 1.50 NT Barge 6.3^ NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS $1^.64 NT Rate per Net Ton $ 6.80 NT (2) 1.50 NT 4.59 NT 1.50 NT 10.00 NT (3) $24.39 NT (1) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (?) SWL 52E ICC 5008 Date: March 31 , 1975 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 CO CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S9 - UPPLF.KEifTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY liATE ANALYS IS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel 0?' BEAR ORIGIN Port Arthur, Texas SWSWXffiXSK CONSTRUCTED ALL-RAIL RATE: ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGII LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 33838 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111 $15.60 NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 990 $ ?M NT WATER MILES 1515 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 199 Rail $ 6.80 NT (2) 1.50 NT 1321 Barge 6.34 NT TOTAL $14.64 NT Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 199 Rail $ 6.80 NT (2) 1.50 NT 957 Barge 4.59 NT 1.50 NT 276 Rail 10.00 NT (3) TOTAL $24.39 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (?) SWL 52E ICC 5008 (L) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - SIC - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY R ATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 6^6 BEAR ORIGIN Port Arthur, Texas BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111 BtmkM&XftR CONSTRUCTED ALL-RAIL RATE: ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATIO CHARGE EX RIVER $15.60 NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 990 $ 7.41 NT WATER MILES 1515 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 199 Rail $ 6.80 NT (2) 1.50 NT 1321 Barge 6.34 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: TOTAL Miles Mode 199 Rail 957 Barge 276 Rail TOTAL $14.64 NT Rate per Net Ton $ 6.80 NT (2) 1.50 NT 4.59 NT 1.50 NT 10.00 NT (3) $24.39 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (?) SWL 52E ICC 5008 CO Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) 11 SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SU RVEY RATE AflALYS IS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Texas KXXm*8X»K CONSTRUCTED ALL-RAIL RATE: $18.00 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 8.65 ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER CANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1 376 BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minn. RAIL 28300 NT (1) MILES 1209 NT WATER MILES 1825 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 199 Rati $ 6.80 NT (2) 1.50 NT 1623 Barge 8.12 NT TOTAL Miles Mode 199 Rail 957 Barge 524 Rail TOTAL $16.42 NT Rate per Net Ton $ 6.80 NT (2) 1.50 NT 4.79 NT 1.50 NT 11.60 NT (3) $26.19 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (3) WTL 442C ICC A4922 ( 9 ) SWL 52E ICC 5008 ( l Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S12 - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RA TE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) ]1+]q BEAR ORIGIN Texas City, Texas BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111 eMS¥M8 x 8P CONSTRUCTED ALL- RAIL RATE: ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER $17.30 NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 1035 $ 0.07 NT WATER MILES ] s g 3 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 282 Rail $10.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT 1321 Barge 6.61 NT TOTAL Miles Mode 282 Rail 957 Barge 276 Rail TOTAL $18.31 NT Rate per Net Ton $10.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT ^.79 NT 1.50 NT 8.^0 NT $26.39 NT REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS I (1) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (3) I FA 1-107B ICC 1219 (2) SV/L 52E ICC 5008 Date: March 31 , 1975 CO CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACV&3-75-C-0O67) - S13 - ;UPPLEfiEHTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE AfJALYS IS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN Texas City, Texas BJKPSSKPMGOOffi CONSTRUCTED ALL-RAIL RATE: $17.30 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 0.33 ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 825^ BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 1035 NT WATER MILES 1583 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 282 Rail $10.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT 1321 Barge 6.61 NT TOTAL Miles Mode Rail 282 957 Barge 276 Rati TOTAL $18.31 NT Rate per Net Ton $10.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT 4.79 NT 1.50 NT 8.40 NT (3) $26.39 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (3) I FA 1-1 07B ICC 1219 (?) SWL 52E ICC 5008 (k) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACV&3-75-C-0067) Sl4 - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE AflALYS IS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 40228 BEAR ORIGIN Corpus Christ! , Texas BEAR DESTINATION Havana, 111 KXKSTXNKXOIK CONSTRUCTED ALL-RAIL RATE: $17.20 NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES ni 5 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 3, .23 NT WATER MILES 1588 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 504 Rail $12.60 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1125 Barge 6.00 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER TOTAL $20.10 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: Miles Mode Rate r>^f Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 504 Rail $12.60 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 957 Barge ^.79 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION 1.50 NT CHARGE EX RIVER 119 Rail TOTAL 5.80 NT (3) $26.19 NT REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (3) |FA 1-1078 ICC 1219 (2) SWL 52E ICC 5008 (*0 Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S15 SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYS IS COMMOD I TYLubrl eating Oils, Grease BEAR OR I G 1 f < Lake Charles, La. EXISTING BRXEBHXIRHKXEH ALL-RAIL RATE: $15.80 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 8.28 ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 7^+1 38 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111 ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 939 NT WATER MILES 1^+78 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 139 Rail $ 6.00 NT (2) 1.50 NT 1321 Barge 7.^0 NT TOTAL Miles Mode 139 Rail 957 Barge 276 Rail TOTAL $14.90 NT Rate per Net Ton $ 6.00 NT (2) 1.50 NT 5.36 NT 1.50 NT 6.20 NT (3) $20.56 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (D SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 ( 9 ) SWL 52 E ICC 5008 (*0 Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S16 $15.30 NT (1) KAIL 28300 MILES 1035 $ 9.25 NT WATER MILES 1641 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 282 Rail $11.40 NT (2) 1.50 NT 13^*0 Barge 7.50 NT SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Lubricating 01 Is, Grease TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 44889 BEAR ORIGIN Houston, Texas BEAR DESTINATION Indiana Harbor, Ind, EXISTING BKXEflNXIKUKXKH ALL-RAIL RATE: ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS : TOTAL $20.40 NT Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 282 Rati $11.40 NT (2) 1.50 NT 957 Barge 5.36 NT 1.50 NT 276 Rail 6.20 NT (3) TOTAL $25.96 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 ( ? ) SWL 52E ICC 5008 (4) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S17 SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYS IS COMMODITY Lubricating Oils, GreaseTOMNAGE (SHORT TONS) 19^14 BEAR ORIGIN Port Arthur, Texas BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. EXISTING BRXEBWSIRUEXEBX ALL- RAIL RATE: $ ALL-V.'ATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: 80 NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 990 hi NT WATER MILES 1521 Mi les Mode Rate per Net Ton 199 Rail $ 7.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT 1321 Barge 7,kO NT TOTAL Miles Mode 199 Rail 957 Barge 276 Rail TOTAL $16.10 NT Rate per Net Ton $ 7.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT 5.36 NT 1.50 NT 6.20 NT (3) $21.76 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (D SWL 1250. ICC 5007 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (2) SWL 52E ICC 5008 (k) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACV&3-75-C-0067) SI 3 SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANAL YS IS COMMODITY Lubricating Oils, Grease TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1 61 03 BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Texas BEAR DESTINATION st. Paul Minn RXXXIXKKXRR CONSTRUCTED RAIL 28300 ALL-RAIL RATE: $17.20 NT (1) MILES j 209 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 9.53 NT WATER MILES ^ 81 8 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 199 Rati $7.20 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1623 Barge 8.44 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER TOTAL $17.1^ NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 199 Rail $ 7.20 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 957 Barge 4.98 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION 1.50 NT CHARGE EX RIVER 524 Rail TOTAL 16.20 NT (3) $31.38 NT REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 (3) WTL 442C ICC A4922 IN) SWL 52E ICC 5008 (*0 Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - 519 SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE Af!A LYSIS COMMODITY Lubricating Oils. Grease TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2040 BEAR ORIGIN Indiana Harbor, Ind. BEAR DESTINATION Galena Park, Texas KXHSMMSXa* CONSTRUCTED ALL-RAIL RATE: $15.80 NT (1) ALL-WATER RATE: $ 7.75 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER Miles Mode 1340 Barge 282 Rail TOTAL Mi les Mode 276 Rail 957 Barge 282 Rail TOTAL RAIL 28300 MILES 1035 WATER MILES 1768 Rate per Met Ton $ 5.76 NT 1.50 NT 11 .40 NT (2) $18.66 NT Rate r>er Net Ton $ 6.20 NT (3) 1.50 NT 4.12 NT 1.50 NT 11.40 NT (2) $24.72 NT REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 1131 ICC 5137 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (2) SWL 52E ICC 5008 (k) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - S20 SUPPLEiiEHTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE Af.'ALYS IS COMMODITY A1 iphatlc Naptha BEAR ORIGIN Houston, Texas EXISTING 8KXK»XXXK»8*K» ALL-RAIL RATE: $16.20 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 8.22 ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1&1 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, Ml NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 1035 NT WATER MILES 1623 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 282 Rail $11.40 NT (2) 1.50 NT 1321 Barge 6.87 NT TOTAL $19.77 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 282 Rail $11.40 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 957 Barge 4.98 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION 1.50 NT CHARGE EX RIVER 276 Rail TOTAL 9.80 NT (3) $29.18 NT REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 1) SV/L 1250. ICC 5007 (3) I FA 1-107B ICC 1219 CO (?) SWL 52E ICC 5008 Date: March 31, 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S21 - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE COMMODITY Aliphatic Naptha BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Texas EXISTING 8KXB8Mg*KHK*KB ALL- RAIL RATE: $16.20 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 8.22 ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS : ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 18136 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, II NT RAIL 28300 MILES 99c NT WATER MILES 1516 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 199 Rail $ 7.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT 1321 Barge 6.87 NT TOTAL Mile s Mode 199 Rail 957 Barge 276 Rail TOTAL $15.57 NT Rate per Net Ton $ 7.20 NT (2) 1.50 NT ^.98 NT 1.50 NT 9.80 NT (3) $2^.98 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 125(1 ICC 5007 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (?) SWL 52 E ICC 5008 (4) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACI-&3-75-C-0067) S22 SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Petroleum Asphalt TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 18275 BEAR ORIGIN Smiths Bluff, Texas BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, II EXISTING BRXXKNSXRMKXKB ALL-RAIL RATE: $17.80 NT (1) ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS : $ 8.80 NT Miles 199 1321 RAIL 28300 MILES 990 WATER MILES 1512 Mode Rate per Net Ton Rail $ 7.20 NT (2) 1.25 NT Barge 7.66 NT TOTAL $16.11 Mfles Mode Rate per Net Ton 199 Rail $ 7.20 NT (2) 1.25 NT 957 Barge 5.55 NT 1.25 NT 276 Rail 10.20 NT (3) TOTAL $25.^5 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 (?) SWL 52 E ICC 5008 Date: March 31, 1975 (3) CO FA 1-107B ICC 1219 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - S23 - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY R ATE -ANALYST S COMMODITY Other Petroleum ProductsTGNNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1528 BEAR ORIGIN Texas Cfty, Texas BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. EX 1 ST 1 NG B&CXBWXmjKJnO) ALL-RAIL RATE: $15.80 NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 1035 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 3.32 NT WATER MILES 1583 ALTERNATIVE RATES: M! les Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 282 Rail $11.40 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1321 Barge 7.00 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER TOTAL $19.90 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 282 Rail $11.40 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 957 Barge 5.07 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION 1.50 NT CHARGE EX RIVER 276 Rail TOTAL 6.20 NT (3) $25.67 NT REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (3) |FA 1-107B ICC 1219 (?) SWL 52E ICC 5008 (4) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DOilLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S24 SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYS IS COMMODITY Butldfng Cement BEAR ORIGIN Clarksvllle, Mo, TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 85M+9 BEAR DESTINATION Galveston, Texas mnxmm constructed ALL-RAIL RATE: $19.00 NT (1) ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER $ 5.92 NT Miles 1059 Mode Barge 282 Rail TOTAL MMes Mode 92 Rail 957 Barge 282 Rail TOTAL RAIL 28300 MILES 866 WATER MILES 1^82 Rate per Net Ton $ k.Zk NT 1.25 NT 10.00 NT (1) $15.^9 NT Rate per Net Ton $4.20 NT 1.25 NT 3.83 NT 1.25 NT 10.00 NT (1) $20.53 NT REMARKS: Rail rate to St. Louis constructed on basis of 7.2% of 1st class rate. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 325B ICC 5156 (3) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S25 - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Castings and Forgings TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3559 BEAR ORIGIN Gary, Ind. BEAR DESTINATION Houston, Texas EXISTING »xxx»N83ntt>xm> ALL-RAIL RATE: $27.73 NT (1) ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: $11.50 NT (2) Miles Mode RAIL 28300 MILES 1035 WATER MILES 1768 Rate per Net Ton 1356 Barge $11.15 NT (2) 2.00 NT 282 Rail 14.20 NT (1) TOTAL $27.35 NT Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 276 Rati $13.20 NT (3) 2.00 NT 957 Barge 9.18 NT (2) 2.00 NT 282 Rail 14.20 NT (1) TOTAL $40.58 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (!) SWL 301E ICC 5098 (3) IFA 82C ICC 1087 ('•) WFB 8B ICC 40 (4) Date: March 31, 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S26 - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYS 15 COMMODITY Steel Mill Products BEAR ORIGIN Gary, Ind. EX I ST I NG BRXXBNSXXBSYKS ALL-RAIL RATE: ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS : $17.80 NT (1) $11.50 NT (2) Miles TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 31 8l BEAR DESTINATION Houston, Texas RAIL 28300 Mode 1356 Barge 282 Rail TOTAL Miles Mode 276 Rail 957 Barge 282 Rail TOTAL MILES 1035 WATER MILES 1768 Rate per Ne t Ton $11.15 NT (2) 2.00 NT 11.20 NT (1) $24.35 NT Rate per Net Ton $11.92 NT (3) 2.00 NT 9.18 NT (2) 2.00 NT 11.20 NT (1) $36.30 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 301 E ICC 5098 (?) WFB 8B ICC kO Date: March 31 , 1975 (3) IFA 82C ICC 1087 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - S27 - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Iron & Steel Products TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 27701 BEAR ORIGIN S. Chicago, 111. BEAR DESTINATION Houston, Texas EXISTING Wixxmxxxxxix> ALL-RAIL RATE: $17.52 NT (1) $11.50 NT (2) Miles 1321 Mode Barr- ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER D! lATIOi! CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE W (1) SWL 301E ICC 50S8 (3) IFA 32C 7 RAIL 28300 MILES 1035 V/ATER MILES 1 757 Rate per Net Ton $11.V <2) 282 Rail NT (1) TOTAL ;5 NT Miles Mode tr Net Ton 276 Rail 11.92 NT (3) 2.00 NT 957 Bare 9.18 NT (2) 2.00 NT 282 Rai 11.80 NT (1) TOTAl $36.90 NT Date: March 31, 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - S28 - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE AFIALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals BEAR ORIGIN Lake Charles, La. TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 99^67 BEAR DESTINATION Jollet, 111. EXISTING BKXKBK8W WEKBH RAIL 28300 ALL-RAIL RATE: $23.60 NT (1) MILES 939 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 7. 82 NT WATER MILES H+52 ALTERNATIVE RATES Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 199 Rati $ 8.98 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.15 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1291 Barge 6.84 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATIOf! CHARGE EX RIVER TOTAL $16.97 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 199 Rail $8.98 NT (2) HAM DL INC- AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.15 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 957 Barge 5.07 NT HANDLING M RIVER DESTINATION .79 NT CHARGE EX RIVER 276 Rail TOTAL 13.60 NT (3) $29.59 NT REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SV/L SW/W 2006J ICC 5056 (3) IFA I-2002T ICC 1287 ('-) SWL 15H ICC 5182 (k) Date: March 31, 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW**3-75-C-0067) - S29 - iUPPLENEHTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE AFIALYS IS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals BEAR ORIGIN Lake Charles, La. EXISTING *KXBtfM*¥WK¥KN ALL-RAIL RATE: $23.60 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 7.82 ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2^31 BEAR DESTINATION Joliet, 111 NT (1) NT RAIL 28300 MILES 939 WATER MILES 1^+52 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 19; Rail $ 0.98 NT (2) 1.15 NT 1291 Barge 6.8^ NT TOTAL Miles Mode 199 Rail 957 Barge 276 Rail TOTAL $16.97 NT Rate per Net Ton $ 8.98 NT (2) 1.15 NT 5.07 NT .79 NT 13.60 NT (3) $29.59 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL SWA' 2006J ICC 5056 (?) SWL 15H ICC 5182 Date: March 31 , 1975 (3) I FA 1-2002T ICC 1287 (':) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW^3-75-C-0067) S30 SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals BEAR ORIGIN Deer Park, Texas existing eaxgaaocKWXCTBK ALL-RAIL RATE: $25.60 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 8.62 ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS : TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 52320 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, Ml. NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 1035 NT WATER MILES ]6\k Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 282 Rail $ 8.76 NT (2) 1.15 NT 1321 Barge 7.00 NT TOTAL Miles Mode 282 Rail 957 Barge 276 Rail TOTAL $16.91 NT Rate per Net Ton $ 8.76 NT (2) 1.15 NT 5.07 NT .79 NT 13.60 NT (3) $29.37 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL SWA'/ 2006J ICC 5056 (?) SWL 8Z ICC 5020 Date: March 31. 1975 (3) IFA 2002T ICC 1287 CO CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACl^3-75-C-0067) - S31 SUPPLEMENTAL TPxAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Coal Tar, Chemical Prods. TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5^79 BEAR ORIGIN Deer Park, Texas BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, Ml EXISTING OKXOQQmeaXXKKfX ALL-RAIL RATE: $17.80 NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 1035 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 9.06 NT WATER MILES 1614 ALTERNATIVE RATES Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 282 Rail $11.40 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.25 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1321 Barge 7.40 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER TOTAL $20.05 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 282 Rail $11.40 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1 .25 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 957 Barge 5.36 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION 1 .25 NT CHARGE EX RIVER 276 Rail TOTAL 10.20 NT (3) $29.46 NT REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 1250. ICC 5007 (3) IFA 1-2002 T ICC 1219 U) SWL 52E ICC 5008 (4) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) ,32 S UPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY ;;ATE AflALYS IS COMMODITY Coal Tar, Chemical Prods. TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1264 BEAR ORIGIN Texas City, Texas BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111 EXISTING «KXR»NX*K8K*KB RAIL 28300 ALL-RAIL RATE: $17.80 NT (1) ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINAT ION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS : $ 9.05 NT Miles 282 1321 MILES 1035 WATER MILES 1582 Mode Rate per Net Ton Rail $11.40 NT (2) 1.25 NT Barge 7.52 NT TOTAL $20.17 NT Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 282 Rail $11.40 NT (2) 1.25 NT 957 Barge 5.45 NT 1.25 NT 276 Rail 10.20 NT (3) TOTAL $29.55 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (?) SWL 52E ICC 5008 (4) Date: March 31, 1975 CHARLES DOMLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - S33 SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITYCoal Tar, Chemical Prods. TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1 6055 BEAR ORIGIN Corpus Christ!, Texas BEAR DESTINATION Treats Islend, 11 KXXXXXKKXBR CONSTRUCTED ALL-RAIL RATE: $19.60 NT (1) ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: $10.94 NT Miles 504 1280 RAIL 28300 MILES 12281 WATER MILES 1747 J Mode Rate per Net Ton Rail $15.20 NT (2) 1.25 NT Barge 7.94 NT TOTAL $24.39 NT Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 504 Rail $15.20 NT (2) 1.25 NT 957 Barge 5.93 NT 1.25 NT 237 Rati 10.20 NT (3) TOTAL $33.83 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 125Q ICC 5007 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (?) SWL 52E ICC 5008 (L) Date: March 31, 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S34 - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Alcohols BEAR ORIGIN West Lake, La. EXISTING XKKXXK&JrcXKffi&O ALL-RAIL RATE: $16.00 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 8.02 ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2829 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, 111. NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 939 NT WATER MILES 1/+ 73 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 139 Rail $ 6.80 NT (2) 1.50 NT 1321 Barge TOTAL 7J3 NT $15.^3 NT Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 139 Rail $6.80 NT (2) 1.50 NT 957 Barge 5.17 NT 1.50 NT 276 Rail }k.kO NT (3) TOTAL $29.37 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 0) SWL 210K ICC 4993 (3) I FA 1-2002T ICC 1287 ('-) SWL 15H ICC 5182 (k) Date: March 31, 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - S35 SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYSIS COMMODITY Fertilizers-NEC BEAR ORIGIN Houston, Texas TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 38514 BEAR DESTINATION Channahan, 111 EXISTING »RXS»N8XRMKXEB ALL-RAIL RATE: $16.58 NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 100 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 6.83 NT WATER MILES 15 8 ALTERNATIVE RATES Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 282 Rail $ 8.03 NT (1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.00 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1281 Barge 5.51 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER TOTAL $14.54 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 282 Rail $8.03 NT (1) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.00 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 957 Barge 4.12 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION 1.00 NT CHARGE EX RIVER 237 Rail TOTAL 7.15 NT (2) $21.30 NT REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 273F ICC 4941 (2) I FA 1-2002T ICC 1287 Date: March 31 , 1975 (3) (4) CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S36 - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE AF! A LYSIS COMMODITY Non-Metallic Minerals BEAR ORIGIN Brownsvi 1 le, Texas EXISTING BRXB8HS*KHB*£8 ALL- RAIL RATE: ALL-WATER RATE: ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATIO CHARGE EX RIVER $20.15 $ 9.11 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 9^ 61 BEAR DESTINATION s « Chicago, 111 RAIL 28300 NT (1) NT Miles 640 Mode Rail 1332 Barge MILES WATER MILES Rate per Ne t Ton $13.34 NT (2) 1.25 NT 6.27 NT 1394 1926 TOTAL $20.86 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 640 Rail $13.34 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.25 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 957 Barge 4.50 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION 1.25 NT CHARGE EX RIVER 276 Rail 9.09 NT (3) TOTAL 29.43 NT REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (0 SWL 354 ICC 5084 (3) B&O 3S1E ICC 25079 (?) SWL 24A ICC 1157 (4) Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) - S37 - SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE ANALYS IS COMMODITY Benzol and Benzene BEAR ORIGIN Cicero, Ml . EDISJTXMGXX)* CONSTRUCTED ALL-RAIL RATE: $19.60 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 7M ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ALTERNATIVE RATES: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS: TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1819 BEAR DESTINATION Beaumont, Texas RAIL 28300 NT (1) MILES 99 NT WATER MILES 151 Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton 1321 Barge 199 Rail TOTAL Miles Mode 276 Rail 957 Barge 199 Rail TOTAL $ 6.47 NT 1.50 NT 7.20 NT (2) $15.17 NT Rate per Net Ton $ 7.80 NT (3) 1.50 NT 4.69 NT 1.50 NT 7.20 NT (2) $22.69 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (1) SWL 1131 ICC 5137 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 (2) SWL 52 E ICC 5008 ( l Date: March 31 , 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S38 - S UPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC SURVEY RATE Af! A LYSIS COMMODITY Benzol and Benzine BEAR ORIGIN Houston Shlpchannel, BEAR DESTINATION Texas TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 19854 Romeov file, 111. BWGQOXDOGXXX* CONSTRUCTED ALL-RAIL RATE: $19.60 NT (1) RAIL 28300 MILES 1035 ALL-WATER RATE: $ 8.67 NT WATER MILES 1628 ALTERNATIVE RATES: Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 282 Rail $11.40 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN 1.50 NT LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1324 Barge 7.02 NT HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER TOTAL $19.92 NT ALTERNATIVE RATES: Miles Mode Rate per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER 282 Rail $11.40 NT (2) HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER REMARKS : 957 Barge 276 Rail TOTAL 1.50 NT 5.07 NT 7.80 NT (3) $27.27 NT EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS (!) SWL 1250, ICC 5007 (3) IFA 1-107B ICC 1219 ( 9 ) SWL 52 E ICC 5008 (4) Date: March 31, 1975 CHARLES DONLEY AND ASSOCIATES (DACW43-75-C-0067) S39 D. Discussion of Rate Analysis 1. Using the rate information provided by Donley and Associates, included in this Appendix, rate differentials were calculated for the 231 movements. The rate differential was defined as the difference between the water rate, including any other charges shown on the rate analysis sheet, and the least-cost alternative, either rail, truck, or a joint rail- water movement. No attempt was made to ascertain the avail- ability of the least-cost alternative. For purposes of analysis, it was assumed that the least-cost alternative would be available as a transportation mode at published rates. 2. As a check on the validity of rail rates, a contract was given to the Tennessee Valley Authority to verify these rates. Generally, there was agreement on the rates. Results of the TVA contract are shown in Part E of this Appendix. The comments are self-explanatory, and the numbering corre- sponds to that of the Donley Rate Analysis sheets. 3. Not all of the rates reviewed by TVA were the same as those provided by Donley and Associates in their final report. Corrections were made as the study progressed and during the final contract meeting. Any movements for which rate changes were made prior to receiving the final report from Donley and Associates and effected benefit calculations are shown in Part F of this Appendix. All other rates utilized are those contained in the final report. 4. Two other points of importance should be noted. First, many of the comments from TVA did not apply to the least-cost alternative and thus did not affect rate differentials. Sec- ond, the rate utilized (always the original provided by Donley and Associates) was normally a conservative rate. Although higher rail rates existed, it was believed to be appropriate to always utilize the lower rate. 5. It should be noted that most of the corrections were small, and normally the original least-cost alternative rate was lower than the actual rate. The exception to this is the- rates provided for movements of salt. Although the changes are large, the salt continues to move under all construction alternatives. Thus, the rate savings to each alternative are overstated by the same amount. This introduces an upward bias in benefit/cost ratio calculations. However, any error App-I-23 introduced in the analysis by not adjusting rate differentials to reflect new rates is well within the limits of the uncer- tainty of demand. Considering all these factors, it was not deemed necessary to adjust rate savings to reflect these changes . App-I-24 E. Rail Rate Validation, Tennessee Valley Authority Sheet No. 1. Corn, Davenport, IA to Guntersville , AL : Existing and alternate rate to St. Louis should be 390$ per Item 11025, Supplement U6, BN 92. 2. OK 3. OK k. Corn, Savage MN to Destrehan, LA : Existing rail rate shown beyond St. Louis applies to New Orleans, however not applicable to Destrehan per Item 230-C(2) , Supplement 112, SFTB 988-A. Item 22697-E, Supplement 112, SFTB 988, publishes rate to Destrehan of 879$ . An East St. Louis combination could also be applied, using the esti- mated rate shown to East St. Louis and 730$ beyond per Item 1050, ICG 602. 5. OK 6. OK 7. Corn, Florence, IL to Baton Rouge, LA : Unable to verify existing or alternate rate shown to St. Louis. Rate possibly has been estimated on the basis of a rate published from a nearby point. Florence is located on the Milwaukee Railroad, however a Burlington Northern tariff has been shown for the rate authority. A Savanna, IL combination from Florence to St. Louis would be 1180$ per Item 3000, CMSTP&P 15165-H and Item 11025, Supplement U6, BN 92. 8. OK 9- Corn, Havana, IL to Baton Rouge, LA : Through rail rate shown is OK. Alternate rail rate of 550$ shown to St. Louis does not apply on export traffic per Item 310 of E-772-E. Item 1232, ICG 1537-Q, publishes rate of 730$ to St. Louis. 10. Corn, Pekin, IL to New Orleans, LA : Through rail rate shown is OK. Alternate rail rate of 6l0$ shown to St. Louis does not apply on export traffic per Item 310 of E-722-E. Item UoUO, WTL 332-H, pub- lishes rate of 830$ to St. Louis. 11. Corn, Pekin, IL to Baton Rouge, LA : Same as No. 10. 12. Corn, Pekin, IL to Westwego , LA : Same as No. 10. App-I-25 13. Corn, Pekin, IL to Vicksburg, MS : Unable to verify existing rate shown. SFTB 972-E does not apply from this origin. Item U20-B, Supplement 31, ICG 3857-F, publishes rate of kkk.5<£ to Cairo, IL; Item 17800, SFTB 972-E publishes rate of U690 beyond, total rate 913-50. Alternate rate OK. lk. Corn, North Pekin, IL to Destrehan, LA : Existing rate OK. Alter nate rail rate of 6lO0 shown to St. Louis does not apply on ex- port traffic per Item 310 of E-772-E. Item Uol+O, WTL 332-H, pub-i lishes rate of 8300 to St. Louis. 15. Corn, Peoria, IL to Baton Rouge, LA : Existing rate OK. Alternat! rail rate of 6100 shown to St. Louis does not apply on export traffic per Item 310 of E-772-E. Item 20UU5, WTL 332-H, publishe; rate of 6800 to St. Louis. 16. Corn, Peoria, IL to Pascagoula, MS : Existing rate OK. Alternate] rail rate of 6100 shown to St. Louis does not apply on export traffic per Item 310 of E-772-E. Item 20HU5, WTL 332-H, publishe rate of 6800 to St. Louis. 17. Corn, Peoria, IL to New Orleans, LA : Same as No. l6. 18. Corn, Spring Valley, IL to New Orleans, LA : Existing rate OK. Alternate rate of 6600 shown to St. Louis does not apply on expoi traffic per Item 310 of E-772-E. Item 665, BN 92, publishes rate of 1010^ to St. Louis. 19. Corn, Spring Valley, IL to New Orleans, LA : Same as No. 18. 20. Corn, Ottawa, IL to Destrehan, LA : Existing rate OK. Alternate rail rate of 6600 shown to St. Louis does not apply on export traffic per Item 310 of E-772-E. Item 6k0 , BN 92, publishes rate of 10100 to St. Louis. 21. Corn, Morris, IL to Westwego, LA : Existing rate OK. Alternate rail rate of 6800 shown to St. Louis does not apply on export traffic per Item 310 of E-772-E. Section 2, Page 58, CRIP 3^560-', publishes rate of 10100 to St. Louis. 22. OK 23. OK 2k. OK 25. OK 26. Soybeans, Florence, IL to New Orleans, LA : Same as No. 7- 27. Soybeans , Beardstown rail rate of 3600 shown to St. Louis. Item 8UU0, Supplement h6 BN 92, publishes rate of 5500. Rail rate shown beyond St. Louis App-I- 26 )K. 28. Soybeans, Havana, IL to New Orleans, LA : Existing rail rate shown published in Item 1050, ICG 602, however does not apply on soy- beans. Item 1010, ICG 602 , publishes rate of 11900 on soybeans. 29. Soybeans, Pekin, IL to Baton Rouge, IiA : Existing rail rate shown published in Item 1050, ICG 602, however, does not apply on soy- beans. Item 1055, ICG 602, publishes rate of 8100 on soybeans. Alternate rail rate shown to St. Louis should be 8300, Item H0 J +0, WTL 332-H. 30. Soybeans, Kingston, IA to Alliance, LA : Unable to verify existing rail rate shown to St 1070^. Louis. Item 2335, BN 92, publishes rate of 31. Soybeans, Savage, MM to New Orleans, LA : Existing and alternate rail rate to St. Louis should be 13800 per Item 1255, Supplement 19, CNW 1719U. 32. OK 33. Barley and Rye, St. Paul, MN to Louisville, KY : Rate of 7-5950 is published in Item 1230, WTL 332-H, however, expired on June 12, 1973. Since this rate has been used as a basis for estimating rates shown on several other sheets, we assume it could be used as an estimated rate in this instance also. 3b . ok 35. 0K 36. OK 37- OK 38. Oats, Savage, MN to Guntersville , AL : See No. 33. 39. OK kO. OK IH. OK 1+2. Wheat, Florence, IL to New Orleans, LA : Same as No. 7- U3- OK hk. Wheat, Peoria, IL to Baton Rouge, LA : Alternate rail rate to St. Louis should be 8300 per Item 10U0, WTL 332-H. 1*5. OK App-I-27 1+6. Wheat, Hannibal, MO to New Orleans, LA : Unable to verify existing and alternate rail rate of 3600 to St. Louis. Item 11025-J, Supplement 1+6, BN 92, publishes rate of 3900, intermediate from Burlington, IA. kj. OK 1+8. Wheat, Pekin, 1L to New Orleans, LA : Alternate rail rate to St. Louis should be 8300 per Item l+Ol+O, WTL 332-H. 1+9. OK 50. OK 51. OK 52. Wheat, Beardstown, IL to New Orleans, LA : Unable to verify exist i|g and alternate rate of 3600 to St. Louis. Item 11025-J, Supplement! 1+6, BN 1+2, publishes rate of 3900, intermediate from Kewanee, IL. 53. Wheat, Louisiana, MO to Pascagoula,, MS : Unable to verify existing and alternate rate of 3600 to St. Louis. Item 11025-J, Supplement 1+6, BN U2, publishes rate of 3900, intermediate from Burlington, ] 5I+. Coal, St. Louis, MO to Cassville, WI : Unable to verify 2000 rate river, or 320 rate for handling at river. 55. 56. Coal, St. Louis, MO to Alma v WI : Same as No., 54. 57. Coal, St. Louis, MO to St. Paul, MN : Unable to verify 2000 rate to river, or 320 handling charge at river. Unable to verify 61+90 or 9^+60 NT single car. 58. Constructed rate. 59- Coal, St. Louis, MO to Chicago, IL : Unable to verify charge to river of i860 or 320 handling. 60. Constructed rate. 61. OK 62. OK 63. OK 61+ . OK 65. Constructed rate. 66. OK App-I-28 67- Coal, Roseville, AR to Cassville, WI : Unable to verify rates. 68. OK 69. OK TO. OK 71. OK 72. OK 73. OK Jk. OK 75- Gasoline, Hartford, IL to Cicero, IL : Through rate shown is OK. Alternate rail rate beyond Hartford shown as 13800, but this rate not applicable to Cicero because of tariff restriction. Item 63830. Supp. 52, IFA 107-B publishes a rate of 16600. 76. OK 77. OK 78. OK 79. Gasoline, Borger, TX to Albany, IL : Through rate shown is OK. Alternate rail rate beyond St. Louis shown as 1^+600. Items 50176, 30610, and 26U0, IFA 107-B, publish combination rate of 13800. 80. OK 81. OK 82. Gasoline, St. Louis, MO to Bettendorf, IA : Unable to verify rate of 1180$ shown. Items 50176 and 30610, IFA 107-B, publish combina- tion rate of 11200. 83. OK 8U. Gasoline, Beaumont, TX to Bettendorf, IA : Through rate shown is OK. Alternate rail rate beyond St. Louis same as 82. 85. OK 86. OK 87. Jet Fuel, Atreco, TX to Cicero, IL : Through rate shown is OK. Alternate rail rate beyond St. Louis shown as 13800. Items 905 and 63830, IFA 107-B, publish a rate of 16600. App-I-29 88. OK 89. OK 90. OK 91. OK 92. Kerosene, Lawrenceville , IL to Cicero, IL : Through rate shown is OK. Alternate rail rate beyond same as 75. 93. OK 9k. Kerosene, Beaumont , TX to Bettendorf, IA : Through rate shown is OK. Alternate rail rate beyond St. Louis same as 82. 95- OK 96. OK 97- Kerosene, Beaumont, TX to Cicero, IL : Through rate shown is OK. Alternate rail rate beyond St. Louis same as 75. 98. OK 99- OK 100. OK 101. OK 102. OK 103. Gas Oil, Fuel Oil, Memphis, TN to Lyons, IA : Through rate of 1520^ shown is not applicable because of tariff restriction. Item 3^112, SWL 125-Q, publishes rate of 20U0<£. Alternate rail rate beyond St. Louis is OK. 10U. OK 105. OK 106. OK 107. OK 108. OK 109. OK 110. OK 111. OK App-I-30 112. OK 113. OK lll4. OK 115. OK 116. OK 117. Gas Oil, Fuel Oil, Mount Vernon, IN to Rock Island, IL : Through rate shown is OK. Alternate rail rate beyond St. Louis shown as l800<£. Item 588l6, IFA 10T-B, publishes rate of l680<£. 118. OK 119- OK 120. OK 121. OK 122. OK 123. OK 124. OK 125. Estimated rates. 126. Estimated rates. 127. Estimated rates. 128. Estimated rates. 129. Estimated rates. 130. Estimated rates. 131. Estimated rates. 132. Estimated rates. 133. Estimated rates. 13^. Estimated rates. 135. Estimated rates. 136. Estimated rates. App-I-31 137. OK 138. OK 139. OK lUO. OK lUl. OK lU2. OK 1U3. OK Ikk. OK lU5. OK lh6. Estimated rates. IU7. OK 1U8. OK 1U9. OK I 150. OK 151. OK 152. OK j 153. OK 15^. OK 155 • Petroleum Asphalt, Smiths Bluff. TX to Cicero. IL : Through rate shown is OK. Alternate rail rate beyond St. Louis shown as 1020; Item 59186, IFA 107-B, publishes rate as 12800. 156. OK 157. OK 158. OK 159. Constructed rate. 160. Constructed rate. 161. Constructed rate. 162. OK App-I-32 163. OK 16U. OK 165. OK l66. Dry Sulphur, Lafourche, LA to Marseilles, IL : Our records do not show Lafourche on navigable water. Rate of 20200 correct if assumed to be intermediate to Lake Charles, LA, as origin and Chicago as destination. l6T. Dry Sulphur, Joliet, IL to St. Louis, MO : Rate of 7200 shown on sheet is rate from St. Louis to Joliet. Must have used this to estimate rate in reverse direction. 168. OK 169. Iron & Steel Scrap, Davenport, IA to St. Louis, MO : Sheet shows a rate of 8W NT. We check 8390 NT. 170. Iron & Steel Scrap, Chicago, IL to Guntersville , AL : Apparently rate to Anniston, AL, of 10kk+2O0 NT. We check 1320<£ NT to be correct. 173. Steel Mill Products, Gary, IN to Houston, TX : A rate of 17800 is shown on sheet. This rate is so much lower than the rate 31900, applying to this specific commodity description that we assume a specific rate applying on sheet steel is being used. We check this rate to be 17*+O0 NT. Rate from Gary to St. Louis shown as 11920 NT. We check this rate to be 11580 NT. mh. Steel Mill Products, South Chicago, IL to St. Louis, M0 : Rate shown on sheet as 11920 NT. We check this rate to be 11580 NT. 175. Steel Mill Products, Gary, IN to New Orleans, LA : This rate checks OK. Rate from Gary, IN, to St. Louis shown as 11920 NT. We check this rate to be 11580 NT. 176. Iron & Steel Products, South Chicago, IL to Houston, TX : Unable to verify rate of 17520 NT. Check rate to be 31900. South Chicago, IL. to St. Louis, M0 rate shown to be 11920 NT. We check this rate to be 11580 NT. App-I-33 177. OK 178. OK 179. OK 180. Manganese, Pittsburgh, PA to Gary, IN : Through rate of lU32<£ shown is present level of a cancelled rate as published in Item 28960, TL-CTR 2009-1. Manganese ore was eliminated from this item in Supplement 28. We assume rate can be used as an estimated rate. 181. OK 182. OK 183. OK 18U. OK 185. OK 186. OK 187. OK 188. OK 189. OK 190. OK 191. OK 192. Co? Coal Tar, Chemical Products, Deer Park, TX to Cicero, IL : Through rate shown is OK. Alternate rail rate beyond St. Louis shown as 1020<£. Item 1035, IFA 107-B, publishes rate of 1280<£. 193. OK 19^. Same as '. 195. Coal Tar 192. , Chemical Products, Corpus Christi , TX to Treats Island, IL Through rate estimated. Alternate rail rate beyond St. Louis shown as 1020^. Item 250^0, IFA 107-B, publishes the rate as llUOtf. 196. OK 197. OK 198. OK App-I-3i+ Alcohols, Plaquemine, LA to Minneapolis, MN : Unable to verify through rate of 20U0$ shown. Item 5100, SWL 210-K, publishes rate of 2500$. Alternate rail rate beyond St. Louis is estimated. Sulphuric acid, St. Louis, MO to Channahon , IL : The through rate of 963$ shown is a published rate from East St. Louis, TL, to Chicago, IL. There are no routes published via Channahon (Railhead Minooka) however, we assume rate could be used as an estimated rate. Published rate from St. Louis to Minooka is 12^6$ per Item Ul80, Supplement U6, IFA I-2002-T. OH to Joliet, IL : Through rate shown is OK. Unable to verify alternate rate of 950$. Item 603-E, Supplement l62, IFA 33-H, publishes rate of 963$ from East St. Louis to Joliet. OK OK Fertilizer & Fertilizer Material, Cicero, IL to Tampa Harbor, FL : Through rate OK. Alternate rate shows 597$ rail to St. Louis, 100$ transfer charge, and 829$ barge. We assume rail and barge factors have been reversed. Item 6100-B, Supplement U6 , IFA L-2002-T publishes rail rate of 829$ to St. Louis. Survey sheet shows total alternate rate of 1506$. Total of three factors above should be 1526$. OK OK OK Superphosphate, Florence, AL to Palmyra, MO : The through rate of 958(^ shown is not applicable from Florence. Item 32030, SFTB 8U0-I, publishes the applicable rate of 993$. Alternate rail rate beyond is estimated. OK OK OK Non-Metallic Minerals, Brownsville, TX to S. Chicago, IL : Unable to find this commodity description in tariff, but found the rate shown on the sheet applying on fluorspar between these two points. LA to Chicago, IL : Sheet shows rate of 1*472$. We check 1515$. St. Louis to Chicago, sheet shows rate of 1199$. We check 1233$. Difference in rates caused by the original use of Table 3, under X-281-B, while we check Table 6 to be applicable. App-I-35 2lU. Salt, Jefferson Island, LA to Dubuque, IA : Sheet shows rate of 18800. We check 19200. St. Louis to Dubuque, sheet shows rate of 13350. We check 13750. Difference in rates caused by the original use of Table 3, under X-281-B, while we check Table 6 to be applicable. 215. Salt, Belle Isle, LA to Savage, MN : Belle Isle is not served by the railroad. Rate used is the Jefferson Island rate and checks OK. 216. Salt, Cote Blanche, LA to Prairie du Chien, WI : Unable to find Cote Blanche listed in any publication. Rate used is the Jefferson Island rate and checks OK. 217- OK 218. Salt, Jefferson Island, LA to Davenport, IA : Sheet shows rate of 18800. We check 19200. St. Louis to Davenport, sheet shows rate of 11630. We check 11980. Difference in rates caused by the original use of Table 3, under X-281-B, while we check Table 6 to be applicable. 219. Salt, Belle Isle, LA to Calumet Harbor, IL : Belle Isle is not served by the railroad. The rate used is the Jefferson Island to Chicago rate and is the same as Sheet No. 213. 220. Salt, Cote Blanche, LA to Dolton, IL : Unable to find Cote Blanche listed in any publication. Rate used is the Jefferson Island to Chicago rate and is in error as shown in Sheet No. 213. 221. Inedible Molasses, New Orleans, LA to Cicero, IL : Through rate of 22UO0 as shown is an effective rate, however, Item 6305-A, Supplement 22, SFTB 9^7-B, publishes rate of 15600 from New Orleans to Cicero. 222. Lime, St. Genevieve, MO to Calumet Harbor, IL : Tonnage shown on sheet is 11,027, while the rate shown is subject to annual volume of 50,000 tons. There is a higher rate of 10370 NT published which applies on an annual volume of 30-50,000 tons. The single car rate, minimum weight 80,000 lbs., is 11600. 223. OK 22U. Estimated rates. 225. Benzol and Benzene, Cicero, IL to Beaumont, TX : Unable to verify through rate of 22000 shown. Part 5, Column 30, Item 12060, SWL 113-1, publishes rate of 22600. Published alternate rate is shown as 10000. Item 1355-B, Supplement 52, IFA 107-B, publishes rate to St. Louis of 12600 and to East St. Louis of 12200. 226. Benzol and Benzene, Houston Ship Channel to Romeoville, IL : Pub- lished through rate shown is OK. Unable to verify published alternate rate shown. Item 58176 and Item 6383O-C, Supplement 52, IFA 107-B, publishes rate of 16600. App-I-36 227- OK 228. Pulp, Baton Rouge, LA to Chicago, IL : Through rate shown is OK. Unable to verify alternate rate of 10800 shown beyond St. Louis. Item 8975, I FA I-2002-T, publishes rate of 1280^. 229. Constructed rates. 230. OK 231. OK A13TD-I-37 Rate Analysis Sheet Number Type of Rate Old Rate $ New Rate 1 $ 27 Existing Rail 46 Alternative; Rail 3.60 3.90 52 to St. Louis 53 54 55 Existing Rail Constructed Rail 8.75 7-14 .30 - 1.61 56 Existing Rail 9-6l Constructed Rail 8.50 - 1.11 58 Existing Rail 9-58 60 Alternative; Rail-Water 8.11 - 1.47 61 62 Existing Rail Constructed Rail 8.39 8.19 - .20 63 Existing Rail Constructed Rail 9.58 9.37 - .21 65 Existing Rail 9-91 9.06 - .85 67 Alternative ; Rail-Water Constructed Rail 11.00 10.02 - .98 80 Alternative; Water-Rail 9.63 11.13 + 1.50 81 Alternative ; Water-Rail 15.43 16.93 + 1.50 85 Constructed Rail 12.80 11.00 - 1.80 117 Alternative; Water-Rail 17.^0 16.40 - 1.00 App-I-38 ate Analysis Type of Change in Rate Differential $ - .09 1.50 heet Number Rate Old Rate New Rate 169 Existing Rail $ 8.48 $ 8.39 191 Alternative ; Water-Rail 19.46 IT- 96 20U Alternative ; Rail-Water 15.06 15.26 + .20 213 Existing Rail 14.72 219 Alternative; 220 Water-Rail 12.57 - 2.15 21k Alternative; Water-Rail 17.61 12.95 - 4.66 215 Alternative ; Water-Rail 20.26 Constructed Rail 15-47 - 4.79 216 Alternative; Water-Rail 19.66 13.90 - 5.76 217 Existing Rail 19.20 Constructed Rail 15. hi - 3.73 218 Alternative; Water-Rail 15.89 11.89 -4.00 229 Alternative ; Water-Rail 23.66 24.20 River Route 6.7k 7.67 - .39 App-I-39 APPENDIX J TRANSPORTATION COST ANALYSIS APPENDIX J Transportation Cost Analysis A. Introduction B. Constraints C. Cost Determination Methodology 1 . Rail Costs 2. Waterway Costs 3. Least-Cost Alternative 4. Cost Analysis Sheets Explanation 5. System Costs 6. Cost Savings Calculation D. Economic Evaluation of Alternative Locks 26 Construction Modes, E. Cost Savings by Category F. Cost Savings Approximated by Rail Rate Adjustment. G. Economic Evaluation of Rail Rate Adjustments Attachment Transportation Cost Analysis Sheets. Table No. App-J- -1 App-J- -2 App-J- -3 App-J- -4 App-J- -5 List of Tables Title Format for Computing Rail Costs Rail Circuits Factors Summary of Loss and Damage Payments by Commodity Groups — 1972 Handling Charges by Commodity for Rail - Water Movements Annual Tonnage moved through and diverted at Locks 26 ICC Rail Variable Cost App-J-6 Annual Tonnage Moved through and diverted at Locks 26 ICC Rail Fully Allocated Cost App-J-7 Transportation Cost Analysis ICC Rail Variable Cost App-J-8 Transporation Cost Analysis ICC Rail Fully Allocated Cost App-J-9 Average Annual Cost Savings by Category by Alternative Rail Variable Cost App-J-10 Average Annual Cost Savings by Category by Alternative Rail Fully Allocated Cost App-J-11 Rate Differential Adjustement Method App-J-12 Transportation Cost Analysis 80 percent of Rail Rate, 70 percent of Rail Rate, 60 percent of Rail Rate App-J-13 Rail Revenue Contribution by Territory-19 Figure No. Title App-J-1 Railroad Territories A. Introduction In computing navigation benefits accruing to alternative construction plans of Locks and Dam No. 26, it was assumed that the rate differentials between the water rate and the least-cost alternative adequately reflected actual savings. However, it was also deemed desirable to calculate alter- native modes cost savings for movements through Locks and Dam No, 26. This serves not only as a check or rate savings, but would also indicate whether alternatives to capacity expansion might be economically desirable and feasible. B. Constraints System constraints used for all portions of the cost analysis were the same as were used in the benefit computation. One exception was use of all-water cost for traffic originating or terminating in GIW West 2 and GIW West 3. Cost data for ocean-going barges indicate that the most likely alternative route, if Vermillion (or Calcasieu) Lock is constrained, would be through the Gulf of Mexico to Louisiana, transfer of the cargo to shal- low-draft barges, and proceed on the Inland Waterways System. The costs would also be comparable for each route and for convenience, it was assumed that the all-water route would be through the GIWW. C. Cost Determination Methodology 1. Rail Costs Rail costs were computed using the computations from Rail Carload Cost Scales - 1972 , published by the Interstate Commerce Commission, Bureau of Accounts. All Movements were cos ted by commodity type, car type, train type and region of operation. The format for computing rail costs if found on page 141 of the ICC publication noted above, and reproduced as table App-J-1. a. Sample All Movements contained in the sample used for the rate analysis were costed out using ICC data for 1972. The sample was supplemented for any reach of the river that was not covered in the rate analysis. Generally, these movements were less than 20,000 tons annually and comprised only a small percentage of the tonnage moved in 1972. These movements were con- sidered to move between the major origins and destinations within the rele- vant portion of the Inland Waterways System and were costed out between these points. b. Rail Miles Rail miles were calculated for each movement from maps of existing railroad track contained in the Handy Railroad Atlas of the United States, APP-J-1 TABLE APP. J-l FORMAT FOR COMPUTING RAIL COSTS Line Item No. (1) Source (2) Amount (cen (3, VARIABLE COST: 1 Terminal: per carload Table 2 per cwt. Table 3 Total per cwt. (Table 2, col. 2) (Line 4 Way train: per car-mile Table 5 per cwt. -mile Table 3, line 1, col. 3, line 1, col. 1 -r 600) + line 3, line 17, col 3, line 17, col 6 7 2 4 5 10895.246 .035 18.194 36.38762 .02224 Total per cwt. -mile (Table 2, col. 6) Through train: per car-mile per cwt. -mile Total per cwt. -mile (Table 2, col. 8) Mileage: Total Way train Through train Way train cost Through train cost Total cost per cwt. (Table 1, Variable) (Line 4 -r 600) + line 5 Table 3, line 33, col. 4 Table 3, line 33, col. 5 (Line 300 38£/ 262 (Line (Line 7 -r 600) + line 8 1.17*/) 1.17V) line 11 line 12 Sum of lines 3, 13, & 14 40.: CONSTANT EXPENSE : 16 Terminal cost per cwt. Table 3, col. 9 17 Line-Haul cost per cwt. -mile Table 3, col. 8 Fully Allocated Cost : Way train per cwt. -mile b/ (Table 2, col. 7) x 1.17 Through train per cwt. -mile (Table 2, col. 9) x 1.17*/ Total terminal cost (Table 2, col. 3) Total way train cost Total through train cost Total cost per cwt. (Table 1, F.A.) (Line 6 + line 17) x 1.17 b/ (Line 9 + line 17) x 1.17 Line 3 + line 16 Line 18 x line 11 Line 19 x line 12 Sum of lines 20, 21, & 22 b/ Item page 6 Item 9, page 148, Table 5, line 1, col. 3 APP-J-2 published by Rand McNally. These maps include main line railroad mileage as well as railroad track by state, including important cities, junctions and terminal points along each rail line. The rail miles were adjusted for circuity by type of haul and car as shown on page 148 of the ICC Rail Carload Cost Scale - 1972 and reproduced as table App-J-2. c. Type of Car Because of the difference in car costs, it was necessary to determine the type of car utilized in the movement of each commodity. The type of car utilized in cost computation for commodity movements are listed below: Grain - covered hopper Coal - open hopper Petroleum - tank car CSSG- gondola; general service Iron & Steel - gondola; general service Industrial chemicals - tank car Lime - box car Agricultural chemicals - tank car Phosphate rock - covered hopper Sugar - tank car Salt - Covered hopper Misc. - Box car or covered hopper The average weight per car, by region, is found in Rail Carload Cost Scales - 1972 o n page 150. The costs per ton were computed using average weight by type of car and region. d. Adjustments Rail costs were computed using the from reproduced as table App-J-1, and data from Table 3 of Rail Carload Cost Scales - 1972 . In order to make these costs compatible with available waterway costs, the following adjustments were made: Loss and Damage Claims - An appropriate allowance for loss and damage for each commodity was added to line 2, Variable Terminal Cost per Hundred- weight. These claims can be found in Appendix A, page 180, of Rail Carload Cost Scales - 1972 and are reproduced as table App-J-3 for the appropriate commodities. e. Type of Train It was generally assumed that all movements would be shipped by through trains. There are two exceptions to this. If a train from one railroad must utilize the main line track of another railroad to complete a movement and the use of the main line track of the second railroad was less than 50 miles, it was assumed that the movements would be by way train for the APP-J- 3 TABLE APP. J- 2 RAIL CIRCUITY FACTORS Line No. Type of Car (1) 1 Box-general service unequipped 2 Box-general service equipped Box-special service 4 Gondola-general service 5 Gondola-special service 6 Hopper open-general service Hopper open-special service Hopper covered 9 Stock 10 Flat-general service 11 Flat-TOFC 12 Refrigerator all 13 Tank all 14 Average, all types Circuity-Per cents Average I Local Interline Interl: (2) (3) (4) 11 17 16 11 17 16 8 18 17 11 18 16 11 18 is ; 10 15 13 : 10 15 13 10 20 18 5 9 8 8 16 13 7 12 9 9 13 12 10 20 18 10 16 15 APP- J- 4 ^r xl -* -^ •P ^ a; o in X TS CN P-^ CP • -p cm ■rl r-< > >, 0— o -h XI u 5 O Q — • ID >X> CTl ^ iH (M n h w r> id m t-H ^J 1 CN r> rH ID ^U3inrHr^rHr^rNOrHror\|r\ICOvOrNCNroini£) ninroncrivD'^oocriOfioirirHLor^^D^oor^ ^j"OOOtNoocri^r~tniHrHr~rovX)tNvcr^^r CNO^rOrHr'IrHrNCNrocOrNrHrHrH 00 C P~ O CDr^o^DOO vo ^ r» * CN ro -* tTi — )(NNOJ(MlM(N(N|(NTJ fl > to p £ rd H P CO o CO > > P o -P 3 o rH p 10 P o CO 3 fl tm ■H P o P 3 >;- to P P -p T3 P >i T3 P O T3 4-1 rH P >1 rH CO W O T) •H — r-! A 3 en p C CO P P P rd CO -p to P >! T3 m P P 0) ft •H p P ^-t P 3 ■H P ■H rji P ft G 13 [fl X> ip > 0) e T3 P u 3 rH U O -rl 3 fl ■H •H G g p IS G ■p rd 3 a 3 3 P r* 3 rH ip rd i G X x: u •H rd -a O P ft P

i p rH rH X! rH rd O G G G o CO o rd tn G g M o rH rH p fd rH 1 ■a p p p P. fl rd rd ■H -H p P 3 •P o O CO fa «C GOCTiOrHCNro'*ir)vDr»oocnOrHCNro<3 • -H •HH > d) O -H 3 u Q c Xl u _ o kO m 01 •^ c P ^^ CN oo n fl ^f* H (1) a> id U m ro in t~- rH rH 01 00 r_| 00 r-\ O ^ CO 01 C\J r— 1 CO rH OH^fl ^r i£> CN CO m in cn 01 r~ in r> ro 00 CO H m r-~ 01 10 no H co oo rr m r- CM 01 CM oo 01 CM rH ^r 01 r- i£ \Q Ol 10 ro 1 •H TJ .* ro •. ro ro r^ O CN 10 _ CN g CO O CN o H CN P CN 1 CN m *~. 00 U 1 rH O "sT CN ro CN •-{ in X! 3 .—. O CN O "^ ID CN CN en 2 CN CN CN •. -^ CN CN 00 oo •H ^ 01 0) to -P v£> CO o P P +J TJ P 10 ft rH r* o CN ft ft ft C Cm rd CU o 00 CN CU CD CU rd H O CN o C3 u O o • U X CN >. X X X •. U a) ■* rH a; rH CU rH CD rH VD *■" m m CN CO 01 O CN CN CN CN CN CN CNOO s H CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN ro 00 ro ro ro ro ro ooro r 1 J I u ft P -P TJ CO 3 CU U u CU P 1 U 3 3 ■H o X 1 TJ r-{ to 3 r< TJ p rd CU CU P^ Cn rH TJ >i — ft ft 0) C X ft ■H rH rd P H CU T3 cn c rd •H TJ rd H rd TJ P p -H --' P § P TJ CU MH C ft O CJ a 3 ft TJ ft CJ > P rd rd U to rd P CO 3 CU TJ » -rH O H I M TJ TJ TJ s p c a. ft P P s v CO 3 rd C rd P P H >i CO CU P P •H O P TJ 3 CD C 3 CO TJ rd rd p P cu u P >4H 4H ft c o> TJ r-i i -P u CU u p p 1 CU P to CD TJ u rH P «. p CO o CJ CU p m 05 X! o CU ■H X! •H >. 3 X) ■H 0) CU rd rd ■H CO x: rd o ■H P rd fl P C ft 0) -P P e p XI c rH rH P ■H p 1 CO a O X! 'g P Cm Q P ^-t 2 o ft CU p 1 Ph U PQ 2 o 3 3 3 X! CU p u H J m fe Cm U Cm C< CO CM APP-J-6 1 ^ T3 ^^ ^ Tl +j ^-^ CD O CO 0) xi T> CM 4-> — M Oi •H C LT) T3 ■H rH > >i CD — C a' •H 45 U =1 5 o Q >-< u a •—* CD 0) en T) 4-1 <1) c 4-> CD (0 tfi ft c C 4-> ^ ■H c ^r (0 C" En ro vD v£> (M ■^ CO in ro CO r- cm oo a> CM vO CM CO H H LO cn ro CT* O r- r- r- cn >> r^ co co co co cn co in h tN ro r> ifl old r- ^ in r-- oo ^r ro m^j* •^ ^ n r^ r-» r~ cm m r-~ co i£> CN Cn CTi LTl Ol r-4 CD 03 Sh en En re! rH ft ft 1 ■ _^ U ro CD U X l£> VD r» r» r^ r» ^ m CO CO r- CO ro ro M ro ro m ro ro «* ^< EJ ^r CU T3 ■H C 1 to St „ , ■> 3 ro iJ 4J cr 1 ^ C CD 1 • CD cn O u H e >i CD o* 03 ft Sh o C U •H cu ■H •r4 hi cn ■H =1 c o UH H -> ft SH tf ■H ■P •rH MH ro t3 3 4-> CU x; G MH 03 C4H O U cn u CD HH M » T3 M cd CD rtf e cn 03 4J kD 03 O rH >i o e ft 4-1 Sh i ro O CD SH c cn •H M +J C >,— cu rc3 rH cd 3 03 cn «. rH Sh 4-> H +J c •H m ■H tr ft M ■H — ' ro \o rrj ■H --' ft •H rH o rH CD cn CD 4-> n 1 U T3 3 u O 03 U CN rH £ cu £ U cn •H •H ■H R rH ro » (CJ 1 03 O CD G 4-1 > > MH ta u U og 4-1 u CJ CO X! 03 Sh CD r-\ «. CU •H CU 0) Sh n Sh Sh 4J u -C J rH 1 CM TJ c H ■H cn CD 4-> ft CU X CD 4-1 (0 cn LD c •H 4-1 r-t 2 ■£ G cn -p 4-> Xi tn ft O -P | 03 £1 U ft 4-1 CD C 4-1 ft U cn Sh o CD ft E O g 03 s £ o CD •H rH Eh r-\ D H C o to H O M Ai o o tu n) ^ W H hJ W W W {h iJ O 0\ 3£2 3 - (fl o p. « c o o n) o 0,0 n) •> ^ o vo to t3 e (3 M *J O 4J O O O to (0 Tl Ml APP-J-12 G u u co o ai m ^ O H > O O -H O .O Q ,J tH O o o nj o CO -O 60 CM S 0) 3 O > O CO H O CO 4J fi M 4J CO OO 01 HA! O H > O >.0 -H O 4J « O ,J •H O O O CO O P, « o m CO 13 mcn rH (i 0) 3 O > O 00 H O M X as * o StJ« > o w H H H Q H O O O «) cfl .*! O H > O >>0 -H O 4J •> Q kJ •H O o o O > O CD -« £ > O H rH C O co £S 2J2 *S2 i-i vo on r~. in m m rH c > m o rH CM a cb < co vD vO .— i 00 ON •CO- ro rH H (S co co H rH rH T. O u en 3 O c o VD cm vO iH o- CO oo i-> in rH rH r~ co rH CO en m en -* ■ > 6£ cu < co p On rH vO On m < ^ t! p H P^ rJ O M Pi Ml C to •H +J *J 01 to o ■S (_> W ON CO rH O O rH CM LO 00 O VO rH VO CO CM co , P^ CM vD O vD O VO on [» H CN CM in co H n n *r CO \D r- r^ on r^ CM fN IT) 00 .H ro ro H *C g w H CO J C (N s O en >, -H r» >H rd -P m rH O CO En 10 >h CO oi R O U £ w Q H H < En I I) <: t-3 u >H o 04 w J a s! 53 H > < H J •H en H +J o 00 O u £ (C CO •p rji ^ c r-» 4 -H ft > CN LJ CO (0 vO >1 CM ■U ■H in X Hi U4 (1 n) 1-1 u n o o O o o o o o O o o o o o O o o o o o O o o o o o o o o o o o o o o >i o o o o o o CN JJ •H o o o o o o CO u o o o o o o ■s s o o o o o o o m n <£> r- CM iH m J u r- 00 (n -a 1 in r^ APP-J-15 F. Cost Savings Approximated by Rail Rate Adjustment 1. In Section VI, it was noted that the rate differential model would be run utilizing rate differentials which had been adjusted downward as a proxy to eliminate railroad fixed costs from rates. This exercise is designed more as a sensitivity test for rates than as a test of the viability of marginal cost pricing for railroads. However, it should be kept in mind that the comparison between barge rates and railroad variable costs has been suggested as a more meaningful test of the comparative advantages of each. 3/ 2. The method by which the rate differentials were adjusted can best be described by the example in table App-J-11. Assume a movement has a water rate of $14.00 per ton, a rail rate of $20.00 per ton, and a joint rail-water rate of $19.00 ($16.00 rail and $3.00 water and handling charge) . The rail rate and the rail portion of the least cost alternative rate were reduced by 20 percent, 30 percent, and 40 percent as a proxy for fixed costs. 3. For this movement, rate differentials of $5.00, $1.80, and -$2.00 per ton are entered into the appropriate program run, and benefits computed accordingly. 4. If the rate differential is negative, the movement is computed as if there were zero rate savings. It may be better to subtract any negative savings from total savings, but there were two reasons this was not done. First, the amount of tonnage which was negative savings under any of the runs is small in relation to total tonnage. Second, the negative savings for any movement is always small, exceeding -$1.00 per ton on only four movements (at 60 percent of the rail rate) . Since this test was not for benefit calculation, it was not deemed necessary to make the above adjustments. G. Economic Evaluation of Rail Rate Adjustments 1. An examination of the B/C ratios in Table App-J-12 indicates that each project is justified under each scenario. However, the ranking of the B/C ratios is different for each scenario. Using 80% of the rail rate for calculating cost savings indicates that a structure with a capacity of 175,000,000 tons (2 - 1200- foot locks at Locks No. 26, constrained by Locks No. 27) maximizes both net annual cost savings and the return to the costs of the structure. Using 70 percent of the rail rate for calculating cost savings indicates that a structure with capacity 175,000,000 tons maximizes net annual cost savings, while a structure with a capacity of 73,000,000 tons (the existing structure) maximizes the return on the cost of the structure. 2. It is readily apparent that for purposes of project justification, rates are not sensitive to changes within a rather wide range. With the APP-j- 16 low return on capital (approximately 3-4 percent over the past decade) that railroads have been experiencing. It seems highly improbable that the use of 60% of the rail rate for computing cost savings is a realistic situation. 3. In a publication by the ICC entitled, Rail Revenue Contribution by Commodity and Territory for the year 1969, revenue, variable cost and fully allocated costs for rail movements are computed. The table App-J-13 shows cost as a percentage of revenue for all commodities by territory in 1969. Figure App-J-1 displays the territory boundaries. 4. Available data, research and testimony at the Congressional hearings for the 1972 Transportation Act would seem to indicate that the use of 80 percent of the rail rate for comparison purposes with water rates yields a fairly comparable picture of the comparative advantage of each mode. Use of this criteria for project justification indicates that net annual cost savings and the return on project expenditures are maximized under the construction alternative with capacity of 175,000,000 tons. APP-J-1 7 TABLE APP J- 11 RATE DIFFERENTIAL ADJUSTMENT METHOD Percent of Rail-Water Rail Rate Water Rate 14.00 Rail Rate 20.00 Rate Rate Differential 100 % 19.00 5.00 80 % 14.00 16.00 15.80 1.80 70 % 14.00 14.00 14.20 60 % 14.00 12.00 12.60 -2.00 APP-J-1S in in m CO hJ o < '.; p " > % ■■-<: CO H H UJ LO :s r u ao st- o O VD \D in co o sr vO v£> vO N H kJ o o < OS u E-t 0-. O 3 2 5 o co a os 5 Pn O 3 H CO CO sf Sh T3 13 rH St CN CM CM CO St St CN CO CO CO o sr m vD CO in vO CO CM o CN CM CM < o Ph H o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o APP-J-19 TABLE APP. J-l3 RAIL REVENUE CONTRIBUTION BY TERRITORY 1969 ORIGI* V DESTINATION^ US VARIABLE COST AS % OF REVENUE FULLY AS ALLOCATED COST % OF REVENUE US 81.1 97.2 OFF OFF 85.3 102.4 SOU WST 90.1 107.5 WST WST 81.1 98.2 OFF SOU 72.6 85.7 SOU OFF 77.2 92.5 OFF WST 70.0 80.5 WST OFF 85.5 102.1 SOU WST 69.8 82.3 WST SOU 68.1 83.1 1/ US - United States OFF- Official SOU - Southern WST - Western APP-J-20 APP-J-21 FOOTNOTES —' U.S. Department of Commerce, Maritime Administration - Domestic Waterborne Shipping Analysis, Appendix G. Transportation Systems Costs prepared by A.T. Kearney, Inc., 1973-1974. 2/ — An Economic Analysis of Alternative Grain Transportation Systems, Iowa State University, prepared for the Federal Railroad Administration, November 1972, Appendix E - page 211. 3/ John R. Meyer, Hearings on 1972 Transportation Act, APP-J-2 ? ATTACHMENT TO APPENDIX J TRANSPORTATION COST ANALYSIS SHEETS REACHES OF THE RIVER Reach Name Abbreviation River Upper Upper Mississippi River U.U. Miss. Mississippi River and tribu- taries above Mouth of Illinois River. Illinois River 111. R. Illinois River from Junction with Mississippi River to Lake Michigan. Missouri River Missouri R. Missouri River from Junction with Mississippi River to terminous. Lower Upper Mississippi L.U. Miss. Mississippi River from Junction of Ohio River to Junction of Illinois River. Lower Ohio River L. Ohio Ohio River from Junction of Mississippi River to Junction of Green River. Tennessee River Tenn. R. Tennessee River from Junction with Ohio River to terminous and tributaries. Cumberland River Cumb. R. Cumberland River from Junction with Ohio River to terminous . Green River Green R. Green-Barren Rivers from Junction with Ohio River to terminous. Middle Ohio M. Ohio Ohio River from Junction of Green River to Junction Kanawha River. Includes minor tributaries east of Cincinnati. Kanawha River Kan. R. Kanawha River from Junction with Ohio River to terminous. Upper Ohio River U. Ohio Ohio River from Junction of Kanawha River to Pittsburgh. Pa. Monongahela River Mon. R. Monongahela River from Junction with Ohio River to terminous & the Youghiogheny River. APP-J ATT-1 Reach Name Abbreviation River Middle Mississippi River M. Miss. Mississippi River from Baton Rouge, La., to Junction of Ohio River, and minor tributaries. Arkansas River Ark. R. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System Lower Mississippi River L. Miss, Mississippi River south of Baton Rouge, La., and Gulf outlets. Atchafalaya River and Alternative Route ATMC Atchafalaya River - Morgan City - Port Allen Route Gulf Intercoastal Waterways W1GIWW GIWW between New Orleans, La., and Junction of Atchafalaya River. W2GIWW GIWW between Atchafalaya River and Galveston, Tex. W3GIWW GIWW between Galveston, Tex. Brownsville, Tex. E1GIWW GIWW between New Orleans, La. and Mobile Bay. E2GIWW GIWW between Mobile Bay and Apalachee Bay, Fla. , including Apalachee and Chattahochee Rivers. Open Waters Open Water Florida coast not included in GIWW. APP-J ATT-2 INDEX OF COMMODITY MOVEMENTS LOCKS NO. 26 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS 1 Davenport, la. 2 Havana, 111. 3 Savage, Minn. 4 Savage, Minn. 5 Savage, Minn. 6 Savage, Minn. 7 Florence, 111. 8 Naples, 111. 9 Havana, 111. 10 Pekin, 111. 11 Pekin, 111. 12 Pekin, 111. 13 Pekin, 111. 14 North Pekin, 111. 15 Peoria, 111. 16 Peoria, 111. 17 Peoria, 111. 18 Spring Valley, 111. 19 Spring Valley, 111. 20 Ottawa, 111. 21 Morris, 111. 22 Alton, 111. 23 LaGrange, Mo. 24 Kingston, la. 25 St. Paul, Minn. SOYBEANS 26 Florence, 111. 27 Beardstown, 111. 28 Havana, 111. 29 Pekin, 111. 30 Kingston, la. APP J ATT- 3 Guntersville, Ala, Guntersville, Ala, New Orleans, La. Destrehan, La. Baton Rouge, La. New Orleans, La. Baton Rouge, La. Baton Rouge, La. Baton Rouge, La. New Orleans, La. Baton Rouge, La. Westwego, La. Vicksburg, Miss. Destrehan, La. Baton Rouge, La. Pascagoula, Miss. New Orleans, La. New Orleans, La. New Orleans, La. Destrehan, La. Westwego, La. New Orleans, La. New Orleans, La. Westwego, La. Westwego, La. New Orleans, La. Memphis, Tenn. New Orleans, La. Baton Rouge, La, Alliance, La. 1,544 45,801 10,765 6,459 165,853 30,446 61,461 4,255 94,198 22,327 7,055 15,367 1,373 1,482 68,976 3,071 35,413 16,232 22,378 100,560 13,001 21,028 6,099 2,942 12,224 1,381 11,263 2,393 2,852 13,591 COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS SOYBEANS 31 Savage, Minn. 32 Naples, 111. BARLEY AND RYE 33 St. Paul, Minn 34 St. Paul, Minn 35 St. Paul, Minn New Orleans, La. Pascagoula, Miss. Louisville, Ky. New Orleans, La. New Orleans, La. 23,068 15,308 13,680 9,240 8,583 OATS 36 37 38 39 40 St. Paul, Minn. Savage, Minn. Savage, Minn. Savage, Minn. Savage, Minn. Vicksburg, Miss. 18,722 Vicksburg, Miss. 9,472 Guntersville, Ala. 25,500 Baton Rouge, La. 15,928 Sbawneetown, 111. 19,470 WHEAT 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 5 3 Savage, Minn. Hannibal, Mo. Havana, 111. Peoria, 111. Havana, 111. Florence, 111. Gregory, Mo. Pekin, 111. Havana, 111. St. Paul, Minn. Savage, Minn. Beardstown, 111, Louisiana, Mo. New Orleans , La. 26,427 New Orleans, La. 4,585 Baton Rouge, La. 5,995 Baton Rouge, La. 1,694 Pascagoula, Miss. 1,373 New Orleans , La. 4,537 New Orleans, La. 1,386 New Orleans, La. 10,260 New Orleans , La. 10,157 St. Louis, Mo. 32,968 Baton Rouge, La. 5,874 New Orleans, La. 2,874 Pascagoula, Miss. 8,090 BITUMINOUS COAL, LIGNITE 54 55 56 57 58 St. Louis, Mo. St. Louis, Mo. St. Louis, Mo. St. Louis, Mo. Uniontown, Ky. Cassville, Wis. Cassville, Wis. Alma, Wis. St. Paul, Minn. St. Paul, Minn. 25,794 213,304 213,634 195,162 12,984 APP J ATT-4 COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS BITUMINOUS COAL, LIGNITE 59 St. Louis, Mo. 60 Uniontown, Ky. 61 Ceredo, W. Va. 62 Ceredo, W. Va. 63 Grand Rivers , Ky . 64 Florence, Ala. 65 Rochester, Ky. 66 Ceredo, W. Va. 67 Roseville, Ark. GASOLINE 68 St. Louis, Mo. 69 St. Louis, Mo. 70 St. Louis, Mo. 71 St. Louis, Mo. 72 Hartford, 111. 73 Hartford, 111. 74 Hartford, 111. 75 Hartford, 111. 76 St. Louis, Mo. 77 Hartford, 111. 78 St. Louis, Mo. 79 St. Louis, Mo. 80 Ostrica, La. 81 Nor co, La. 82 St. Louis, Mo. 83 Hartford, 111. 84 Beaumont , Tex . 85 Channahan, 111. JET FUEL 86 Hartford, 111. 87 Atreco, Tex. KEROSENE 88 Violet, La. 89 New Orleans, La. 90 Nor co, La. 91 Nor co, La. 92 Mount Vernon, Ind. APP J ATT-5 Chicago, 111. 36,470 Minneapolis, Minn. 58,940 Cicero, 111. 30,306 Chicago, 111. 13,788 St. Paul, Minn. 13,757 Chicago, 111. 16,486 Alma, Wis. 64,534 Minneapolis, Minn. 4,250 Cassville, Wis. 18,495 Kingston Mines, 111. 137,258 Peoria, 111. 3,316 Peru, 111. 13,703 LaCrosse, Wis. 18,711 Winona , Minn . 40,197 St. Paul, Minn. 17,345 Quincy, 111. 81,230 Cicero, 111. 186,148 Canton, Mo. 60,135 North Pekin, 111. 252,702 LaGrange, Mo. 11,896 Albany, 111. 27,225 North Pekin, 111. 37,908 Black River, Wis. 17,426 Bettendorf, la. 26,815 Winona , Minn . 20,362 Bettendorf, la. 58,535 St. Louis, Mo. 9,940 St. Paul, Minn. Cicero, 111. Black River, Wis. Black River, Wis. St. Paul, Minn. Black River, Wis. Cicero, 111. 38,825 2,059 7,593 1,841 7,983 3,432 5,347 COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS KEROSENE 93 Mount Vernon, Ind. Peoria, 111. 1,506 94 Beaumont, Tex. Bettendorf, la. 2,392 95 Beaumont, Tex. St. Paul, Minn. 4,827 96 Beaumont, Tex. Black River, Wis. 11,410 97 Beaumont, Tex. Cicero, 111. 3,637 GAS OIL, FUEL OIL 98 Hartford, 111. North Pekin, 111. 176,893 99 St. Louis, Mo. Albany, 111. 31,683 100 Hartford, 111. Quincy, 111. 32,580 101 Violet, La. Black River, Wis. 18,583 102 New Orleans, La. Black River, Wis. 1,841 103 Memphis, Tenn. Lyons, la. 4,763 104 St. Louis, Mo. Bettendorf, la. 7,208 105 St. Louis, Mo. Fulton, 111. 6,055 106 St. Louis, Mo. Winona, Minn. 3,149 107 St. Louis, Mo. Burlington, la. 21,975 108 St. Louis, Mo. Kingston Mines, 111. 84,317 109 St. Louis, Mo. Albany, 111. 2,419 110 Hartford, 111. North Pekin, 111. 5,789 111 Hartford, 111. Albany, 111. 4,917 112 Hartford, 111. North Pekin, 111. 11,128 113 Hartford, 111. Minnesota River, Minn. 2,386 114 Hartford, 111. Davenport, la. 5,828 115 Hartford, 111. Clinton, la. 9,362 116 Hartford, 111. Cicero, 111. 24,278 117 Mount Vernon, Ind. Rock Island, 111. 2,681 118 Mount Vernon, Ind. Cicero, 111. 22,464 119 Beaumont, Tex. LaGrange, Mo. 7,228 120 Beaumont, Tex. St. Paul, Minn. 5,264 121 Beaumont, Tex. Cicero, 111. 10,600 122 Port Arthur, Tex. Cicero, 111. 33,838 123 Port Arthur, Tex. Cicero, 111. 6,166 124 Cicero, 111. St. Louis, Mo. 3,124 APP J ATT-6 COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS RESIDUAL FUEL OIL 125 Hartford, 111. Peru, 111. 1,212 126 Hartford, 111. Peru, 111. 13,964 127 Mount Vernon, Ind. Cicero, 111. 33,055 128 Violet, La. Cicero, 111. 154,521 129 New Orleans, La. Cicero, 111. 10,746 130 Nor co, La. Cicero, 111. 58,673 131 Baton Rouge, La. Cicero, 111. 37,107 132 Baton Rouge, La. Havana, 111. 12,044 133 Memphis, Tenn. Peru, 111. 1,422 134 Hartford, 111. Cicero, 111. 7,756 135 Hartford, 111. St. Paul, Minn. 5,891 136 Mount Vernon, Ind. Cicero, 111. 55,356 137 Beaumont, Tex. St. Paul, Minn. 1,376 138 Texas City, Tex. Cicero, 111. 1,410 139 Texas City, Tex. Cicero, 111. 8,254 140 Dolton, 111. Hartford, 111. 156,507 141 Corpus Christi, Tex. Havana, 111. 48,228 LUBRICATING OILS, GREASE 142 143 144 145 146 Lake Charles, La. Houston, Tex. Port Arthur, Tex. Beaumont, Tex. Indiana Harbor, Ind. 147 Indiana Harbor, Ind. ALIPHATIC NAPTHA Cicero, 111. Indiana Harbor, Cicero, 111. St. Paul, Minn. Galena Park, Tex Hartford, 111. Ind. 74,138 44,889 19,414 16,103 2,040 7,212 148 Hartford, 111. Indiana Harbor, Ind. 5,847 149 Houston, Tex. Cicero, 111. 7,847 150 Kenova, W. Va. Cicero, 111. 1,074 151 Beaumont, Tex. Cicero, 111. 18,136 PETROLEUM ASPHALT 152 Hartford, 111. Cicero, 111. 74,424 153 Hartford, 111. Cicero, 111. 11,862 154 St. Paul, Minn. Baton Rouge, La. 8,111 155 Smiths Bluff, Tex. APP ATT- J -7 Cicero, 111. 18,275 COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS OTHER PETROLEUM PRODUCTS 156 157 Baton Rouge, La. Texas City, Tex. Cicero, 111. Cicero, 111. 12,451 1,528 SAND - GRAVEL - ROCK 158 159 St. Louis, Mo. Belief ontaine, Mo. Cicero, 111. Alton, 111. 1,452 10,500 BUILDING CEMENT 160 161 162 163 164 St. Louis, Mo. Vermillion River, 111. Clarksville, Mo. Clarksville, Mo. Clarksville, Mo. Pekin, 111. St. Louis, Mo. Nashville, Tenn. Galveston, Tex. Michoud Canal, La. 36,277 66,709 141,983 85,449 112,914 165 Hannibal, Mo. St. Louis, Mo. 130,100 DRY SULPHUR 166 167 LaFourche, La. Joliet, 111. Marseilles, 111. St. Louis, Mo. 19,710 12,035 IRON AND STEEL SCRAP 168 169 170 Paducah, Ky. Davenport, la. Chicago, 111. Alton, 111. St. Louis, Mo. Guntersville, Ala. 717 6,871 8,777 CASTINGS AND FORGINGS 171 172 South Chicago, 111. Gary, Ind. Granite City, 111. Houston, Tex. 536 3,559 STEEL MILL PRODUCTS 173 174 175 Gary, Ind. South Chicago, 111. Gary, Ind. Houston, Tex. St. Louis, Mo. New Orleans, La. 3,181 4,458 1,807 IRON AND STEEL PRODUCTS Houston, Tex. 27,701 APP J ATT-8 COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN IRON ORE CONCENTRATES 177 Burnside, La. 178 Burnside, La. MANGANESE 179 Burnside, La. 180 Pittsburgh, Pa. PIG IRON 181 Sheffield, Ala. 182 Sheffield, Ala. INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS RIVER DESTINATION TONS Indiana Harbor, Ind. 12,229 Calumet Harbor, 111. 5,717 South Chicago, 111. 1,257 Gary, Ind. 1,243 Calumet Harbor, 111. 1,586 Calumet Harbor, 111. 9,192 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 Lake Charles, La. Lake Charles, La. Deer Park, Tex. Nor co, La. Marmet, W. Va. Memphis, Tenn. Bar fie Id, Ark. Am. Cyanimid Fortier Pit., La. Joliet, 111. 99,467 Joliet, 111. 2,431 Cicero, 111. 52,320 Cicero, 111. 13,732 Seneca, 111. 30,000 Lake Calumet, 111. 5,400 Louisiana, Mo. 49,692 Hannibal, Mo. 55,000 SODIUM HYDROXIDE 191 Geismar, La. Chicago, 111, 15,016 COAL TAR, CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 192 Deer Park, Tex. 193 New Orleans, La. 194 Texas City, Tex. 195 Corpus Christi, Tex. ALCOHOLS 196 Baton Rouge, La. 197 West Lake, La. 198 Calumet Harbor, 111. 199 P laq uemine , La . Cicero, 111. Joliet, 111. Cicero, 111. Treats Island, 111. Cicero, 111. Cicero, 111. St. Albans, W. Va. Minneapolis, Minn. 5,479 1,748 1,264 16,065 24,368 2,829 70,086 3,773 APP J ATT-9 COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS SULPHURIC ACID 200 St. Louis, Mo. Channahan, 111. 21,255 201 Cincinnati, Ohio Joliet, 111. 2,051 PHOSPHATE ROCK 202 Burnside, La. Quincy, 111. 4,447 203 Tampa, Fla. Joliet, 111. 115,305 FERTILIZER AND FERTILIZER MAT. 204 Cicero, 111. NITROGENOUS FERTILIZER 205 St. Louis, Mo. SUPERPHOSPHATE 206 New Orleans, La. 207 Harlem, La. 208 Florence, , Ala. FERTILIZERS - - NEC Houston, 209 Tex. SUGAR 210 Burnside. , La. 211 Albania, La. NON-METALLIC MINERALS 212 SALT Brownsville, Tex, Tampa Harbor, Fla. 33,600 Calumet Harbor, 111. 22,155 South Chicago, 111. 1,240 St. Paul, Minn. 4,161 Palmyra, Mo. 2,990 Channahan, 111. 38,514 Chicago, 111. 146,432 Chicago, 111. 24,616 South Chicago, 111. 9,461 213 214 215 216 217 Jefferson Island, La. Jefferson Island, La, Belle Isle, La. Cote Blanche, La. Weeks Island, La. Chicago, 111. 58,063 Dubuque, la. 7,914 Savage, Minn. 128,172 Prairie DuChien, Wis. 14,973 Minneapolis, Minn. 1,412 APP J ATT-10 COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION' TONS SALT 218 219 220 Jefferson Island, La Belle Isle, La. Cote Blanche, La. INEDIBLE MOLASSES 221 New Orleans, La. LIME 222 223 Ste. Genevieve, Mo. Ste. Genevieve, Mo. BENZOL AND BENZENE 224 225 226 227 Hartford, 111. Cicero, 111. Houston Ship Channel Hartford, 111. WOOD PULP 228 Baton Rouge, La. Davenport, la. 10,772 Calumet Harbor, 111. 181,719 Dolton, 111. 65,461 Cicero, 111. 3,815 Calumet Harbor, 111. 11,027 Calumet Harbor, 111. 453,967 Dolton, 111. 5,829 Beaumont, Tex. 1,819 Romeoville, 111. 19,854 St. Paul, Minn. 2,445 Chicago, 111. 31,201 STANDARD NEWSPRINT PAPER 229 Hiwassee River, Tenn. TALLOW - ANIMAL FATS - OILS Minneapolis, Minn. 7,196 230 231 CORN Dubuque, la. Chicago, 111. Avondale, La. Avondale, La. 25,371 24,231 232 233 234 235 236 St. Paul, Minn. St. Louis, Mo. 1,399 U. U. Miss. L. Ohio X U. U. Miss. M. Miss. X U. U. Miss. Ark. River X U. U. Miss. W1GIWW X APP J ATT-11 COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS CORN 237 238 239 240 241 U. U. Miss. U. U. Miss. 111. River 111. River 111. River E2GIWW Open Water Missouri River L. U. Miss. L. Ohio 242 243 244 245 246 111. River 111. River 111. River L. U. Miss, Alton, 111, Ark. River W1GIWW Open Water U. U. Miss. Guntersville, Ala, X X X X 596 SOYBEANS 247 U. U. Miss. L. U. Miss. X 248 U. U. Miss. Tenn. River X 249 U. U. Miss. M. Miss. X 250 U. U. Miss. E2GIWW X 251 111. River L. U. Miss. X 252 111. River Tenn. River X 253 Peoria, 111. Tulsa, Okla. 1,371 254 111. River W2GIWW X 255 L. U. Miss. U. U. Miss. X 256 St. Louis, Mo. New Orleans, La. 24,322 257 L. Miss. U. U. Miss. X BARLEY RYE 258 259 St. Paul, Minn. U. U. Miss. St. Louis, Mo. Open Water 2,908 X OATS 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 111. River L. U. Miss. 111. River Tenn. River 111. River M. Miss. 111. River L. Miss. 111. River W2GIWW 111. River Open Water L. U . Miss. L. Miss. APP J ATT-12 COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS WHEAT 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 U. U. Miss. U. U. Miss. U. U. Miss. U. U. Miss. U. U. Miss. U. U. Miss. U. U. Miss. 111. River 111. River Kansas City. Omaha, Neb. L. U. Miss. L. U. Miss. L. U. Miss. L. U. Miss. M. Miss. Mo. L. Ohio X Term. River X M. Ohio X M. Miss. X W2GIWW X W3GIWW X Open Water X L. U. Miss. X Tenn. River X Chicago, 111. 1,934 St. Louis, Mo. 1,133 111. River X Tenn. River X L. Miss. X W2GIWW X L. U. Miss. COAL 283 LaCrosse, Wis. Rosiclare, 111. 2,668 284 Charleston, W. Va. St. Paul, Minn. 5,667 285 Charleston, W. Va. Chicago, 111. 13,732 286 Pittsburgh, Pa. Alma, Wis. 5,525 287 Van Bur en, Ark. Chicago, 111. 10,086 CRUDE PETROLEUM 288 Chicago, 111. St. Louis, Mo. 79,206 FUEL OIL 289 Clinton, la. Norco, La. 2,594 290 111. River M. Ohio X 291 New Orleans, Lz i. Chicago, 111. 6,508 RESIDUAL FUEL OIL 292 Chicago, 111. Decateur, Ala. 1,300 293 111. River M. Ohio X 294 U. U. Miss. W2GIWW X 295 Chicago, 111. Steubenville, Ohio 1,200 APP J ATT-13 COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS ASPHALT 296 M. Ohio U. U. Miss. X 297 U. Ohio 111. River X COKE, PETROLEUM 298 Term. River U. U. Miss. X BUILDING CEMENT 299 Clarksville, Mo. Memphis, Tenn. 28,401 300 Clarksville, Mo. New Orleans, La. 14,789 301 Clarksville, Mo. Mobile, Ala. 88,597 302 Ottawa, 111. St. Charles, Mo. 17,838 303 La Salle, 111. Pa due ah, Ky. 14,431 304 La Salle, 111. Cincinnati, Ohio 40,620 305 Ottawa, 111. Browns vi 1 le , Tex . 2,854 306 Kansas City, Mo. Chicago, 111. 12,768 307 Baton Rouge, La. Chicago, 111. 4,067 IRON AND STEEL 308 Clinton, la. Decateur, Ala. 445 309 St. Paul, Minn. Nashville, Tenn. 409 310 Davenport, la. Weir ton, W. Va. 2,496 311 Bettendorf, la. Pittsburgh, Pa. 1,334 312 U. U. Miss. M. Miss. X 313 St. Paul, Minn. Tulsa, Okla. 1,700 314 St. Paul, Minn. Harvey, La. 610 315 St. Paul, Minn. Houston, Tex. 819 316 Chicago, 111. Kansas City, Mo. 891 317 Chicago, 111. Evans ville, Ind. 743 318 Chicago, 111. Nashville, Tenn. 595 319 Chicago, 111. Louisville, Ky. 654 320 Chicago, 111. Aliquippa, Pa. 5,866 321 Pekin, 111. Pine Bluff, Ark. 1,152 322 Indiana Harbor, Ind. Vidalia, La. 252 323 Chicago, 111. Thibodaux Jet., La. 1,372 324 111. River W3GIWW X 325 Chicago, 111. Mobile, Ala. 619 326 111. River Open Water X 327 St. Louis, Mo. St. Paul, Minn. 826 328 St. Louis, Mo. Chicago, 111. 791 329 Alton, 111. Paducah, Ky. 433 330 Alton, 111. Louisville, Ky. 696 APP J ATT- -14 COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS IRON AND STEEL 331 Alton, 111. 332 Alton, 111. 333 Alton, 111. 334 Alton, 111. 335 L. U. Miss. 336 Decatur, Ala. 337 Paducah, Ky. 338 Nashville, Tenn. 339 Nashville, Tenn. 340 Ironton, Ohio 341 Huntington, W. Va 342 Cincinnati, Ohio 343 St. Albans, W. Va 344 Baden, Pa. 345 Aliquippa, Pa. 346 Aliquippa, Pa. 347 Pittsburgh, Pa. 348 Memphis, Tenn. 349 Memphis, Tenn. 350 Memphis, Tenn. 351 Little Rock, A r k. 352 Pine Bluff, Ark. 353 Baton Rouge, La. 354 New Orleans, La. 355 New Orleans, La. 356 Lockport, La. 357 Harvey, La. 358 Houston, Tex. 359 Houston, Tex. 360 Brownsville, Tex. 361 Brownsville, Tex. 362 Mobile, Ala. INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS Rosedale, Miss. 353 Little Rock, Ark. 633 New Orleans, La. 1,350 Houston, Tex. 583 Open Water X Minneapolis, Minn. 1,072 Alton, 111. 2,261 Chicago, 111. 1,099 Alton, 111. 20,757 Minneapolis, Minn. 537 Peoria, 111. 1,289 Alton, 111. 1,132 Chicago, 111. 1,008 Cordova, 111. 832 Chicago, 111. 642 Alton, 111. 3,351 Rock Island, 111. 600 St. Paul, Minn. 2,820 Chicago, 111. 1,338 Alton, 111. 1,340 Chicago, 111. 306 Alton, 111. 780 Keokuk, la. 3,464 Chicago, 111. 102 Alton, 111. 27,134 Chicago, 111. 72 Portage, 111. 348 Rock Island, 111. 755 Chicago, 111. 207 Quincy, 111. 1,197 Chicago, 111. 2,431 Chicago, 111. 9,364 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 Louisiana, Mo. Omaha, Neb. Dubuque, la. Hartford, 111. Hamilton, 111. Vidalia, La. Clinton, la. Norco, La. Albany, 111. Pt. Arthur, Tex. Chicago, 111. Decatur, Ala. Chicago, 111. Ironton, Ohio Chicago, 111. Steubenville, Ohio Chicago, 111. Pittsburgh, Pa. Chicago, 111. Memphis, Tenn. APP J ATT- -15 3,300 7,500 1,307 4,149 1,378 1,400 12,224 6,756 11,585 8,952 COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 Joliet, 111. Chicago, 111. Chicago, 111. Chicago, 111. Chicago, 111. Paducah, Ky. Paducah , Ky. Kenova, W. Va . Charleston, W. Va . Moundsville , W. Va , Midland, Pa. Pittsburgh, Pa„ Lake Charles, La. Beaumont, Tex. Slidell, La. Slidell, La. Pascagoula, Miss. Birmingham, Ala. Avondale, La. Berwick, La. Houma , La . Houston, Tex. Pascagoula, Miss. Winona, Wis. Chicago, 111. St. Paul, Minn. St. Paul, Minn. St. Paul, Minn. Chicago, 111. Louisiana, Mo. St. Paul, Minn. St. Paul, Minn. Louisiana, Mo. Peru, 111. Pekin, 111. Chicago, 111. 3,180 1,384 2,859 4,064 800 926 33,576 1,277 919 1,200 1,278 15,399 10,510 1,191 10,000 5,000 5,000 11,437 AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 Louisiana, Mo. Louisiana, Mo. Minneapolis, Minn. Louisiana, Mo. Louisiana, Mo. Burlington, la. Chicago, 111. Chicago, 111. Marseilles, 111. Joliet, 111. Granite City, 111. Sheffield, Ala. Ironton, Ohio Helena, Ark. Caruthersville, Mo, Lake Charles, La. Lake Charles, La. Beaumont, Tex. Pascagoula, Miss. New Haven, Mo. Henderson, Ky. Sheffield, Ala. Louisville, Ky. Memphis, Tenn. Burns ide, La. Granite City, 111 Sheffield, Ala. Louisville, Ky. Avondale, La. Muscatine, la. Chicago, 111. Havana, 111. St. Paul, Minn. Chicago, 111. Dubuque, la. Joliet, 111. Muscatine, la. Pekin, 111. 3,629 5,173 1,400 2,241 3,039 5,650 1,467 1,413 1,176 1,422 5,204 3,007 1,440 1,347 2,808 1,293 2,398 1,305 3,820 APP J ATT-16 COST ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER RIVER ORIGIN RIVER DESTINATION TONS NON-METALLIC MINERALS 410 411 412 413 414 415 Ottawa, 111. Ottawa, 111. Chicago, I lie Cumberland River New Orleans, La. New Orleans, La. St. Charles, Mo, St. Louis, Mo. Houston, Tex. U. U. Miss. St. Paul, Minn. Chicago, 111. 1,114 1,549 2,863 X 1,200 1,400 SALT 416 MOUSSES 417 418 419 St. Louis, Mo. St. Paul, Minn. St. Paul, Minn. Baton Rouge, La, Sto Paul, Minn, St. Louis, Mo. Baton Rouge, La, St. Paul, Minn. 1,408 14,544 15,327 30,089 APP J ATT-17 TRAFFIC SURVE Y COST ANALYSIS OHNODITY Corn TONNAGE BEAR DES (SHOR1 TONS) 1544 EAR OKICl!! Davenport ' Iowa TIKATION GuntersvlUe, Alabama Tenn. R. ALL RAI L U.U. Miss. AIL: ARIABLE: 6.11 ULLY. ALLOCATED 8.83 MILES 725 COST ALTERNATIVE: VARTAr.l.K RAIL: 2.77 WATER: 2 - % W ,-,. 5 -73 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 4.24 WATEPj 3 - 25 TOTAL: 7.49 RIVER ROUTE (Brrge, Bar ge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per i'ct Ton HARGE TO RIVER. «_»*»»«„ _„ IDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ■ ' ' ^ IKE-HAUL CHARGE . 888 Barg a 3 no hNDL I i!G AT RIVER DESTINATION - HARGE EX RIVER TIER ' .40 TOTAL 3.49 SHARKS EXPLANATI ON OF R EFERENC E NARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 1 COMMODITY Corn BEAR ORIGI ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Havana, Illinois 111. R. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: TRAFFIC SUR VEY COST ANALYSIS ■5.16 7.49 5.16 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 45801 BEAR DESTINATION G nnr prsvi l la, Alert ;. Air n - R - RAIL MILES 654 WATER : TOTAL 3.94 -UAXER-L 2J).L TOTAL: fit 5.16 M^8~- - RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER umm HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 743 Barge REMARKS Cairo TOTAL EXPLANATION 'OF REFERENCE NARKS 6 7 Cost per He ' 2.98 i ■ .37 3.35 Cost Sheet 2 OliMODITY Corn EAR OR 1 G I fJ Sava 8 e » Minnesota IAIL: IARIABLE : U.U. Miss. IJLLY ALLOCATED 1 COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1Q765 10.42 14.99 5.74 .12 BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans L. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 131 4 WATER : 1.99 TOTAL 7.73 ■ I-JATKK 2.20 TOTAL: 10.32 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net Ton HARGE TO RIVER ANOLING AT RIVER ORIGIN INE-HAUL CHARGE IDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION HARGE EX RIVER I HER SHARKS :■ 1711 Baroe TOTAL 3.04 .49 3.53 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 3 COMMODITY Corn DEAR OR I Git' ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Savage, Minnesota U.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTKRNATIV1 VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 10.42 14.99 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 6459 BEAR DESTINATION Destrehan,. Louisiar L. Miss. ALL RAIL 1314 MILES RAIL: . 5.74 WATER: 1.97 'fOT A} • 7.71 RA IL : 8.12 WATER : 2.17 TOTAL: 10.29 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi lcs Mode Cost per Hfit l CHARGE TO RIVER m , • I HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ; 1 LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1691 Bar 90 _ ■HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ' _ OTHER TOTAL 3.02 .48 3.50 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 :: Cost Sheet 4 Oi'-iMODITY Corn lEAR ^ |G | N Savage, Minnesota ■ U.U. Miss. {AIL: /ARIAULE: TILLY ALLOCATED ' COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL TRAIT I C SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 10.25 14.73 5.74 RAIL: 8.12 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 165853 BEAR DESTINATION Ba . ton Rouge, Louisiana L. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 1286 WAT}- 1.85 TOTAL 7.59 -tIAXEJi. 2.03 TOTAL 10.15 RIVER ROUTE (garqe, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode HARGE TO RIVER _ r __^ IAWDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN INE-HAUL CHARGE ANDLIUG AT RIVER DESTINATION HARGE EX RIVER iTHER E HARKS : 1568 B2rq Illinois 111. R. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST Cn^T ALTERNATIVE: " VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED. COST ANALYSIS 6.42 9.32 1.91 RAIL: 2.74 15367 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTII!ATI0r! WestwegO '. Louisiam L. Miss. raVl 848 MILES WATER.: 1.99 -JOTAJ. : 3.90 JJAmJ 2^20 T0TAL: 4^4 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or-Truck) MI les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1221 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Ne To 2.24 .31 2.55 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 10 - Cost Sheet 12 TRAFFIC SURVEY :CI:MOOITY Corn JEAR ORIGIN Pe kin, Illinois RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED F COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED- RAIL: RAIL: COS T AfJALYS I S TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1373 5.25 7.61. 1.91 2.74 BEAR DESTINATION Vicksburg,. Mississippi M. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 667 WATER: 1 - 50 TDT AL: ' 3. 41 WATER 1.-60 TOTAL : 4.34 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode :harge to river moling at river origin jwe-haul charge handling at river destination :harge EX RIVER DTHER SHARKS : 725 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 1.91 .24 2.15 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 13 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST AN/ .LYSIS (SHORT TOMS) 1482 COMMODITY Corn TONNAGE BEAR DE< BEAR OR 1 GU'! North Pekin, Illinois >TI NATION Drestrehan, Loui^i ALL RAIL: IU * R ' VAHTAK1.F- D * JO L. Miss. ALL RAIL I < FULLY ALLOCATED MILES 838 1.97 TOTA) • LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: vartav.i I? RAIL: ■ WATER 3.88 • FULLY ALLOCATED RATE: 2 ' 74 WATER : 2.17 TOTAL: 4.91 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ___, matm HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1210 Barge Cose REMARKS : TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 J^LI 2.25 .31 2.56 - Cost Sheet 14 TRArnc SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Corn V.ttODITY TONNAGE (SHORT TOMS) 6897i : .AR ORIGIN Peoria, Illinois BEAR PEST 1 NAT 1 ON Baton Rouge, Louisiana ML: I13 " R ' L ' Miss * , _. ALL \RIABLE: . 5_-24 RA I L MILES 82 ° JLLY ALLOCATED 9.06 COST ALTERNATIVE: RAIL 1,97 UATF.TJ. 1-85 Tnn , u . 3.82 VARIABLE KA1L: ' . WATER: x -° 3 T n T AT MAY ALLOCATED SAIL: 2J12 LJA^.J , 2-. 03 T0TAL: 4^&5 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net Ton !<\RGE TO RIVER ,-,„,.„,., m ^_ IDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN IKE-HAUL CHARGE 109 ° Barge 2.14 Idling at river destination harge ex river (HER .29 TOTAL 2.43 EHARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS _^ , . 6 10 Cost Sheet 15 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Corn COMMODITY - Lorn TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3071 BEAR ORIGlN Peoria ' Illinols BEAR DESTINATION Pascagoula,, Missis: ) ALL RAIL: IU ' R ' E2-6IWW ALL VARIABLE: 6.75 RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED 9 - 50 MILES 859 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 1.97 WATER: 3.40 ' TOTAL; 5.37 RAIL: 3.03 ....... .. WATER L 3.70 TOTAL: 6.73 RIVER 'ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost: per He CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 13 50 Barg a HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ' CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 16 .40 TOTAL 3.28 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn TONNAGE. (SHORT TONS) 35413 BEAR ORIGIN Peoria > Illinois BEAR DESTINATION Ne ^ Orleans, Louisia na RAIL: 111. R. L. Miss. , /0 ALL VARIABLE: 6 - 42 RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED ■T COST "ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 9.32 MILES 847 RAIL: 1.97 WATER: 1.99 TOTAI • 3.96 RAIL: 2.82 WATER : 2.20 TOTAL: 5.02 RIVER RC'JTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ^ • HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LIME-HAUL CHARGE 1233 . Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ; CHARGE EX RIVER ; OTHER TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 2.28 .32 2.60 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 17 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn BEAR ORIGIN, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Spring Valley, Illinois 111. R. 6.62 . FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED 9.62 TONNAGE (SHORT TOMS) 162 32 BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, Lou L. Miss. ALL RAIL 879 MILES RAIL: 2.37 WATER: 1.99 T n TM ■ - 4.36 RAIT,: 3.41 WATER 5 2.20 TOTAL : 5.51 ' RIVER ROUTE (Baroo, Barqc-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1290 Barge R Eli ARKS L. TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 10 Cost per i'e 2.51 35 2.86 Cost Sheet 18 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST AMI YS IS :0HH0D I TY Corn T0IH1AGE (SHORT TOMS) 22378 i[AR ORIGIN S P ri "g Valley, Illinois BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, Louisian a 'ML: 111. R. Ai]L . Miss /ARIABLE: 6 ' 62 RA|"l MILES 879 LILLY ALLOCATED 9.62 ' COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE RAIL: 2.37 WATER : 1.99 T^T A I • 4.36 RAIL: 3.41 WATER : 2.20 TOTAL : 5.51 FULLY ALLOCATED - RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Darge-Rail or .Truck) Hi 1 e s Mode . Cost per Met: Ton :HARGE TO RIVER mi _____ IANPLING AT RIVER ORIGIN •' .INE-HAUL CHARGE 1290 Bcrqe 2.51 SADDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION , HARGE EX RIVER ' ITHER ' . -35 TOTAL 2.86 Sharks : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 19. TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Corn BEAR ORIGIN Ottawa, Illinois 111. R. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED COST ANALYSIS 6.72 9.76 TONNAGE (SHORT TOMS) 100560 BEAR DESTINATION Destrehan, Louisiah ALL 1 L. Miss. RAIL MILES 894 RAIL: 2.44 WATER: 1.97 TOTAL: 4.41 RAIL: 3.51 WATER : 2.17 TOTAL: 5.68 REMARKS RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net V CHARGE TO RIVER __ ^^^^ , • HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LIME-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1288 Barqe TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 2.56 .36 2.92 Cost Sheet 20 COf MODITY_ BEAR OKIGI RAIL: VARIABLE: Corn Morris, Illinois 111. R. FULLY ALLOCATED T CriST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED TRAFTIC SUR VEY COST ANALYSIS 6.89 10.01 TONNAGE. (SHORT TONS) 13001 BEAR DESTINATION Westwego, Louisiana ALL 1 * MiSS ' RAIL 921 MILES RAIL: 2.51 WATER: 1.99 TOTAI •• 4.50 RAIL: 3.62 WATER : 2.70 TOTAL : 5.82 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Ml les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ^ ■ . " HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LIME-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1332 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 2.68 .38 3.06 HE MARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 21 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANA I Y c . IS COMMODITY Corn TONNAGE (SHORT TOWS) 21028 BEAR ORIGIM Alton, Illinois ALL RAIL: L.U. Miss. VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans. T.n.,j t 5.70 ..26 ALL L - Miss. RAIL MILES 736 RAIL: 1.14 WATER : 1.99 TOT/,] • 3.13 RAIL: 1.55 WViTp : 2.20 TOTAL : 1.7S RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode ' CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1057 Barg a TOTAL REMARKS EXPLANATION -OF REFERENCE NARKS 10 Cost Sheet 22 Cost per "c ( \ 1.60 .22 1 1.82 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS OfiMODITY Corn EAR ORIGIN , LaGrange, Missouri j\IL: U.U. Miss. ARIABLE: ULLY ALLOCATED COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 7.79 10.31 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 6099 BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, Louisiana L. Miss. ALL RAIL 862 MILES RAIL: 2.65 WATER : 1.99 TOTAJ • L.fsL RAIL: 3.47 WATER : 2.20 TOTAL : 5.67 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode harge to river- ' indling at river origin sine-haul charge Wing at river destination ! harge ex river , THER 1190 irqe TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 1. .27 2.16 E MARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 23 TRAPFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Corn Kingston, Iowa BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: u - u - Miss - VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE . FULLY ALLOCATED COST ANALYSIS 6.66 1.93 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2942 BEAR DESTINATION Westwego, Louisi jiu ALL L ' RAIL MILES Miss. 938 RAIL: 2.70 WATER : 1.99 TOTAT • 4.69 RAIL: 4.12 ... .... WATER: 2.20 TOTAL : — 6t32— REMARKS RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Ra t 1 or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1269 Barge TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. Cost per Mi ! : 2.07 1 ' .30 2.37 10 Cost Sheet 24 TRAfTIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS CViMODlTY Corn TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 12224 EAR ORIGIN Stj Pau1, Minnesota BEAR DESTINATION Westwego, Louisiana AIL: U.U. Miss. _ ^ jt L. Miss< ARIABLE: 10-32 RAK MILES 1306 ULLY ALLOCATED 14.26 COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE KAILj 5.57 ^^ 1^99 Trm v 7.56 patt 7 - 93 . 2.20 TOTAL: 10.13 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 1 , . WATER.: — RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net Ton HARGE TO RIVER ; . IDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN . ' IKE-HAUL CHARGE 1695 Barge 3.01 .__ IDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ' MRGE EX RIVER THER .47 TOTAL EHARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 6 3.48 10 Cost Sheet 25 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST A!.' A LYSIS COMMODITY Soybeans BEAR ORIGIN. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Florence, Illinois 111. R. 8.07 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED 10.19 TOI!i!AGE (SHORT TONS) 1381 B EAR DEST1.' !AT I OM New Orleans, Louis a, L. Miss. 830 ALL V RAIL MILES RAIL: 1.67 HATER : 1.99 TOTAL • 3.66 RAIL: 2.39 HATER : 2.20 TOTAL : 4.59 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1127 Barqa TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 Cost pe r Net 1 .1 .86 .25 2 11 7 10 Cost Sheet '26 L- TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COHMODITY Soybeans Beardstown, Illinois BEAR OR I G I M PjUL: 111. R. VARTAHLE: FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE: "VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 4.38 .55 TONNAGE (SHORT TOMS) 11263 DEAR DESTINATION Memphis,. Tennesee ALL M. Miss. RAIL 466 MILES RAIL: 2.26 WATER: 1.19 T<">TAL- 3.45 RAIL: 3.45 WATER : 1.27 TOTAL : 4.7? RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or -Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LIME-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 525 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 1.36 .15 1.51 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 27 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY BEAR OR I G I ! ! ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Soybeans Havana, Illinois 111. R. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: - VARIABLE RAIL COST ANALYSIS 6.59 9.57 1.77 FULLY ALLOCATED: RAIL: 2.54 TONNAGE (SHORT TOMS) 2393 BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, Loi ALL L. Miss RAIL 874 MILES WATER : 1.99 JJATEI 2.20 TOTAL 3.76 TOTAL: 4.74 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barac-Rail or .Truck) Mi 1 c s Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1192 Baroe REMARKS TOTAL Cost per M T 2 .11 — <— .30 2 .41 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 28 TRAIT I C SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Soybeans TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2852 BEAR ORIGIN Pekin > Illinois , BEAR DEST ll'ATION Baton Rouge, Louisian a I RAIL: HI. R. VARIABLE: 6 - 18 r'aTl HUES 811 FULLY ALLOCATED 8.98 :ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 1-91 WATER; 1-85 ?nTAT . 3. 76 FULLY AlinrATrn RAIL: 2>74 WAT!: P. ; 2 >03 T0TAL: 4. 77 RIVER ROUTE (garqe, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode - Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1081 t^rge 2.10 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER ' .29 TOTAL 2.39 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS i 10 Cost Sheet 29 COMMODITY Soybeans Kingston, Iowa BEAR 0RIGIH_ ALL RAIL: u - u - Miss VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE TRAFFIC SURV EY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TOMS) 13591 BEAR DESTINATION Alliance, La. 7.21 ALL RAIL MILES L. Miss. 901 10.69 RAIL 2.70 WATER 1.85 TOT AT 4.55 FULLY. ALLOCATED RAIT, 4.12 J-ZAUiTv 2.03 TOTAL 6.15 R_[VER ROUTE ( Baro_ e. Barge-Rail or Truck). Mi ies Mode' CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1129 __Bar_c}e_ Cost per Hi T 2.11 REMARKS .31 TOTAL 2.42 r FXPLANAT10N OF REFE^ Ej^EJjARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 30 COMMODITY Soybeans 3EAR ORIGIN Savage, Minn. RAIL: VARIABLE : U.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED r CHST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE ' RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 10.42 14.99 5.74 8.12 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 7 3068 BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans. La. AUL. Miss. RAIL MILES 1314 WATER: 1.99 -TOTAL. 7.73 WATER : 2.20 TOTAL: 10.32 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode - ;HARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LIME-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1711 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 3 .04 .48 3. 52 EXPLANATION -OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 31 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Soybeans BEAK OR I Gil! Naples, 111, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 111. R. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST Com' ALTERNATIVE: "VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: RAIL: COLT ANALYSIS 10.35 14.93 5.74 1.12 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 15308 BEAR DEST I NAT I OH ■Pascaftou.la , Miss. ALL E2 GIWW RA I L MILES 1307 WATE 2.94 -ATE 3.31 UQI A i 8.61 TOTAL: 11.43 RIVER ROUTE (Bar ge, Barge-Rail or -Truc k) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LI HE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OIIIER 1255 B arge REMARKS TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. Cost per let 2.48 ! .36 2.84 Cost Sheet 32 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST AIM LYSIS COMMODITY Barley and Rye BEAR OR I G I N_ RAIL: VARIABLE : St. Paul, Minnesota U.U. Miss. 7.35 FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED 10.53 RAIL: 7.35 RAT 10.53 TONNAGE (SHORT TOWS) 1368O BEAR DESTINATION Louisville. KPnt-nrfcy ALL M - Ohio RAIL MILES 849 WATER: WATER: _0_ tota; 7.35 TOTAL: 10.53 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ' . ■IDLING. AT RIVER ORIGIN ; ' ' LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1223 Barge 3.78 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION _ CHARGE EX RIVER f . OTHER ' . .30 TOTAL 4.08 REMARKS EXPLANATION 'OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 33 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY BEAR ORIGI ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : COST ANALYSIS Barley and Rye St. Paul, Minnesota U.U. Miss. 10.26 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FirLLY ALLOCATED 14.77 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 9240 IP BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans. Lou- -.„ ALL L. Miss RAIL MILES 1296 RAIL: 5.57 WATER : 1.99 TOTAL : 7.56 RAIL: 7.93 VJATER : — 2.20 TOTAL : 10.13 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1698 Barge TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 Cost per Met • 3.01 .47 3.48 10 Cost Sheet 34 TRArriC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS :0J:M0DITY Barley and Rye SEAR ORIGIN St. Paul, Minnesota RAIL: U.U. Miss. VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED r COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 10.26 14.77 RAIL: 5.57 FULLY ALLOCATED. RA1 7.93 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 8583 BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, Louisiana AuJ RAIL MILES L. Miss 1296 WATER: 1.99 TOTAL: 7.56 IZAT.EE 2.20 TOTAL: 10.13 1698 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode :harge TO RIVER _,.,_-— HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Tr--s 3.01 .47 3.48 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 10 Cost Sheet 35 TRATFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY 0at f TOHMAGE (SHORT TOMS) 18722 BEAR ORIGIN St. Paul, Minnesota BEAR DESTif . AT | p- N Vicksburg, Missis j.* ALL RAIL: U.U. Miss. M. Miss 9.13 ALL VARIABLE: RAIL MILES 112 3 FULLY ALLOCATED 13.13 RAIL: . 5.57 WATER: 1.50 T^TAI ' 7.07 RAIL: 7.93 WATER? 1.60 TOTAL: 9.53 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per- Metiftoi CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1199 Barg e 2.68 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ; ' _ OTHER ,40 TOTAL 3.08 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 36 TRAFMC SURVfY COST ANALYSIS )>-iM0DITY 0ats TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 9472 :AR ORIGIN Sava § e » Minnesota- BEAR DEST[ KAT | 0N Vicksburg, Mississipp: ML: U.U. Miss. M . Miss . ALL 1J RA I L MILES 1141 JLLY ALLOCATED COST ALTERNATIVE : 9.30 13.35 /ARIABLE RAIL: WATER 5-74 1.50 7# 24 -TOTAL : HILLY ALLOCATED Ulkl !Li? IZAXE P. • 1 - 6 ° T0TAL; 9 ' 72 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode MGE TO RIVER __««««_ __ IDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN IME-HAUL CHARGE 1212 Barge IDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION HARGE EX RIVER rHER TOTAL EHARKS : EXPLANATION -OF REFERENCE NARKS Cost per Net Ton 2 .70 .42 3 .12 7. 10 Cost Sheet 37 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY BEAR ORIGI ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: COST ANALYSIS Oats Savage, Minnesota. U.U. Miss. 9.18 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 13.18 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 25500 BEAR DESTINATION Guntersville. ATT. Tenn. R, RAIL MILES 1123 RAIL: 5.74 . WATER : 2.54 T<">TA] * 8.28 RAIL: 8.12 WATER : 2.82 TOTAL: 10.94 RIVER ROUTE (B'arqc, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode - CHARGE TO RIVER , HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1262 Barge REMARKS : TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 6 Cost per Me 1,Q1 .31 4.22 - 10 Cost Sheet 38 TRAFF iC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 15928 IEAR ORIGIN Sava §e, Minnesota BEAR DESTINATION Baton Rouge. Louisi ana JAIL: U.U. Miss. T M . 10.25 ALT. 1 " Miss. VARIABLE: : RAIL MILES 1287 TJLLY ALLOCATED 14.73 RAIL: 5.74 WATER: 1.85 TDTAJ • 7.59 RAIL: 8.12 . .... HATER : 2.03 TOTAL: 10.15 f COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton :harge to river ' mimm , | WDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ; ' ' .INE-HAUL CHARGE I 568 Barge 2.90 &NDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION :HARGE EX RIVER 3THER ' t -45 TOTAL 3 - 35 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 39 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Oats BEAR ORIGIN S*vage, Minnesota ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : U.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL COST ANALYSIS 6.68 9.53 6.68 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 9.53 TONNAGE. (SHORT TONS) 19470 BEAR DESTINATION Shawnefetown. Ill L^ ALL*" Ohio RAIL MILES 738 WATER , JUTJU. 6.68 11AXEJI TOTAL: 9.53 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' .__ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE _ HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Cost per MelJTnr 981 Barqe TOTAL 2.78 : .31 3.09 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 40 TRAfriC SURVEY Of:MOD!TY Wheat EAR OR 1 G I M Savage, Minnesota AIL: U.U. Miss ARIABLE: ULLY ALLOCATED COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: COST ANALYSIS 10.42 14.99 5_,74_ TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 26427 FULLY ALLOCATED- RAIL: 12 BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, Louisian a L. Miss 1314 ALL J RAIL MILES WATER : 4^94- TDTAL -H&IEft : 2.20 TOTAL: 10.32 RIVER ROUTE (Barce, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mod e HARGE TO RIVER. " ANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN INE-HAUL CHARGE ADDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION iHARGE EX RIVER )THER 1711 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 3.04 .48 3.52 IEHARKS : EXP LANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 41 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS CONMODITY Wheat TONNAGE (SHORT TOMS) 4585 BEAR ORIGIN Hannibal > Missouri BE AR DESTINATION New Orleans, Loui L^ ALL RAIL: U.U. Miss. ALL 1 ' Miss VARIABLE: &*22 RAIL MILES 839 i_ FULLY ALLOCATED 10.29 RAIL: 2.11 WATER : 1.99 TOT AT • 3.10 RAIL: 3.24 WATER : 2.20 TOTAL: 5.44 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE -VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or .Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER - HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 116 3 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER RE HARKS TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 7. 10 Cost per Met 1.83 1 - .26 2.09 Cost Sheet 42 QHHODITY' ^ ieat EAR ORIGIN AIL: 111. R TRIABLE : LILLY ALLOCATED gnST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FITLLY ALLO( i Havana, Illinois TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 6.40 9.29 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5995 BEAR DESTINATION Baton R . ou 8 e » Louisiana . L. Miss. All RAIL: 1.77 WATER: i , as T n TAL" 3,62 'ED RAIL: 2.54 .. -,..i:atei; : , 2.03 TOTAL : 4.57 RIVER ROUTE (B arge, Ba rge-Rail or Truck) Mi les f4ode KARGE TO RIVER IDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN INE-HAUL CHARGE MOLING AT RIVER DESTINATION HARGE EX RIVER THER EliARKS : 1049 Barge TOTAL Cost per i'et Ton 1.97 .27 2.24 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 43 TRAFFIC SURVEY Wheat COMMODITY Peoria, Illinois BEAR OR I G I ! !_ ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 111. R. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED COST ANALYSIS 6.24 9.06 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1694 BEAR DESTINATION Baton Rouge, Loi.si L. Miss ALL RAIL MILES 820 RAIL: 1.97 WATER : 1.85 t^T^L: 3.82 RAIL: 2.82 u.yrpp : 2.03 TOTAL : 4.85 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER m HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1090 Barqo TOTAL Cost per He Ti 2.14 .29 2.43 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 44 P TRAfTIC SURVEY ■KODITY ^ eat COS'I ' ANALYSIS TONNAGE (s ;ti HORT TONS) 1373 IR ORIGIN Havana > Illinois. BEAR DCS NATION Pascagoula, Mississip [L: 111. R. 6.43 4T E2-GIWW ALL RAIL ,LY ALLOCATED 9.43 MILES 848 Rrr alternative: ■TATU.F RAIL: 1.82 WATER: 2.94 4.76 TOT, 'J • ILLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 2.55 WATER : 3.31 TOTAL: 5.86 RIVER ROUTE (Sarqe, Barae-Rail or Truck) Mi 1 es Mode \RGE TO RIVER mmm __ r __^ mm IDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN *!E-HAUL CHARGE fLING AT RIVER DESTINATION \RGE EX RIVER m 1308 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 2.71 .38 3.09 iARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 45 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Wheat COMMODITY BEAR ORIGIN Florence > Illinois TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 4537 BEAR D ES T I NAT I ON New Orleans, Louj si; ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 111. R. ;.07 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED 10.19 ALL RAIL MILES L. Miss. 830 RAIL: 1.67 WATER: . 1.99 T°T/VT • 3 66 RAIL: 2.39 WATFP : ? ?n TOTAL: RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Ml les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ; . HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1127 Barqe TOTAL REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 46 Cost per N r__ 1.86 1 ; . .25 2.11 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS [QiiMOOITY TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 138 6 Gregory, Missouri w „ n . T BEAR ORIGIN ■ BEAR DESTINATION N ew Orleans, Louisian a TJATT . \J.\J. MiSS. T „. RAIL: .,,L. Miss. A -31 ALL VARIABLE: 6.31 RA |L 10.50 MILES 884 RAIL: 2.41 WATER : 1.99 TOT A J • 3.40 RAIL: 3.69 WATER : 2.20 TOTAL : 5.89 FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (gorge, Baroc-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER _____ ' __ . HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN [ • ; LIKE-HAUL CHARGE 12Q6 Barge 1.93 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ___ ' CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER ' -28 TOTAL 2.21 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 47 TRAFFIC SUP. V FY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Wheat TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) io 2 6n BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Pekin, Illinois BEAR PEST I NATION New Orleans, T* 111. R. 6.36 ALL*- Miss. RAIL MILES 838 - FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE 9.23 RAIL: 1.91 WATER : 1.99 TOTAI • 3.90 RAIL: 2.74 WATER : 2.20 TOTAL : 4.94 I FULLY. ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barae, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1221 Barqe TOTAL REMARKS Cost per Net 2.24 .32 2.56 EXPLANATION OF REF ERENCE MARKS 6 7. 8 . i 9 10 Cost Shee_t 48 TRArrir. survey COST ANAI YSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TOI!5) 10157 Havana, Illinois . R(rAn imsctimati rv.i New Orleans, La BEAR ORIGIM "* v -*" d » tZlZ_II '. BEAR DEST ! t!AT I ON RAIL: 111. R. L. Miss VARIABLE: 6 -59 RA I L MILES 874 FULLY ALLOCATED 9.57 ■ COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 1.77 WAT ER; 1,99 T "T AL: 3. 7G FULLY ALLOCATED MIL: 2 ' 54 I-MT EIV 2 ' 20 T ° TAL: 4 - 74 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode ' Cost per Net: Ton CHARGE TO RIVER . HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIM LIKE-HAUL CHARGE 1189 Barqe 2 ' U HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : .29 TOTAL 2.40 EXPLANATION -OF REFERENCE HARKS 10 Cost Sheet 49 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Wheat BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: St. Paul, Minnesota COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 32968 BEAR DESTINATION U.U. Miss. 5.57 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST Cn^T ALTERNATIVE "VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 7.93 St. Louis, Missoii j_| ALL L.U. Miss RAIL MILES 575 RAIL: 5.57 WATER : THtat ' 5.57 RAIL: 7.93 . , WATER : TOTAL : 7.93 . ! RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 661 TOTAL Cost per ■ Net or 1 .76 ] 1 I 27 2 03 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 50 TRAFFIC S URVCY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Wheat TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5874 Savage, Minnesota • hC cT.MAT,nu Baton Rou 8 e > Louisiana BEAR ORIGIN DEAR DESTINATION_ RAIL: u - u - Miss - L. Miss 10 2 5 ALL VARIABLE: Z3 . RAIL MILES 1286 FULLY ALLOCATED 14.73 I COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: 5.74 WATER : 1.85 T n TAI • 7.59 RAIL: 8.12 - -WATER : ?.03 TOTAL : 10.15 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost: per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE . 1555 Barge 2 ' 87 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : ,44 TOTAL 3.31 EXPLANATION 'OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 51 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Wheat TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2874 BEAR OR! GIN BeardstQwn > Illinols BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, La. ALL RAIL: ni " R ' L- Miss. ALL VARIABLE: ft ■ 79 RAIL MILES 837 FULLY ALLOCATED 10.06 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: 2.10 WATER : 1.79 T nT A7 • T.8Q RAIL: 3.23 WATEP : 1.99 TOTAL: 5.22 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net r CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE • 1121 Barge 1.95 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER -27 TOTAL 2 ' 22 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS u. 10 Cost Sheet 52 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Wheat COMMODITY WneaC TONNAGE (SHORT TOi!S) 809 ° BEAR ORIGli! Louisiana » Missouri BEAR DEST|NAT|QN Pascagoula, Mississip p Jail: u - u - Miss - e2-giww ,- a . All VARIABLE: 5 - 86 RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE 71 799 MILES FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 1.97 WATER: 2.94 TOT A] • 4.91 i RAIL: 3.03 . .. .WATER : 3.31 TOTAL: 6.3d RIVER ROUTE (Ba r ge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost: per Net Tr-n CHARGE TO RIVER | HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN L I HE-HAUL CHARGE - „____ Barge 2 ' 37 __ HAi-DL I i^G AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : .65 TOTAL 3.02 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 53 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS C0M1CDITY Bitu minous Coal, Lignite BEAR ORIGIN St - Louis > Missouri ALL RAIL: VARIABLE L.U. Miss. 2.18 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 3.36 RAIL: 2.18 3.36 FULLY ALLOCATED . RAIL: TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 25794 BEAR DESTINATION Cassville, Wisconi r AU U.U. Miss. RAIL MILES J/ HATER : 2.18 TOTAL WATER TOTAL : 3.36 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE •HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 428 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net 2.02 25 2.27 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 54 Li* TRAfTIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS CONMODITY Bituminous Coal, ;nite TONNAGE (SHORT BEAR DESTINATI TONS) 213304 BEAR ORIGIN St ' Louis > Missouri ON Cassville, Wisconsin ^jjU.U. Miss RAIL RAIL: L.U. Miss. VARIABLE: 2.18 FULLY ALLOCATED 3.36 MILES 337 1 COST ALTERNATIVE: VARTA1U.F. RA1] < : 2.18 WATER : ° ^:. 2 - 18 Flil.i.Y AT.T.nrATrn RAIL: 3.36 . , WATER- TOTAL: 3.36 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 428 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Tc 2.02 .25 2.27 EXPLANA TI ON OF REFERENCE NARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 55 TRAFriC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: L - u - Miss - VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE Bituminous Coal, Lignite St. Louis, Missouri 2.73 4.21 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 213634 BEAR DESTINATION Alma, Wisconsin Alt U.U. Miss RAIL MILES 465 FULLY ALT, CAT ED RAIL: 2.73 WATER: JOTM ■ 2.73 RAIL: 4.21 WATER : ° TOTAL: 4.21 RIVER ROUTE (B'arqe, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode- CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 572 Barge TOTAL Cost per Netilo — 2.60 — .34 2.94 EXPLANATION .OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 56 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COhnCDITY Bituminous Coal, Lignite TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 195162 BEAR ORIGIN St - Louis > Misso uri BEAR DES Tlf!ATlON St. Paul, Minne sota RAIL: L.U. Miss. ^ ] U.U. Miss SARI A BLE : 3 - 1 9 r A \ L FULLY ALLOCATED 4 - 94 MILES 575 ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 3.19 WATER : TDTAJ • 3.19 RAIL: 4.94 ... I-7AXKR : . TOTAL: 4.94 v RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Dame-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ,',» ; ,'.,, ___ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ; LIME-HAUL CHARGE 665 Barge 2.97 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER ' z .40 TOTAL 3.37 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 5 7 TRAFFIC SURVEY CC/.MODITY COST ANALYSIS Bituminous Coal, Lignite TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 12984 BEAR OR I GUI. RAIL: VARIABLE: fully allocated k st cost alternative "variable El ILLY. ALLOCATED Uniontown, Kentucky L. Ohio 4.03 6.24 BEAR PEST I NAT I OH St- Paul, Minnest ALL U.U. Miss RAIL 771 MILES RAIL: 4.03 WATER : TOTA T .*-03 RAIT,: 6.24 W-\TER : TOTAL: 6.24 RIVER ROUTE (Baroe, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER 07 HER 982 Barge REMARKS TOTAL Cost per He tfl 3.88 .52 4.40 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 58 COMMODITY BEAR ORIGIN RAIL: VARIABLE: traffic survey COST ANALYSIS ituminous Coal, Lignite TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 36470 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, Illinois St. Louis, Missouri L.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED. 1.54 FULLY ALLOCATED : ST COST ALTERNATIVE: "VARIABLE 2.35 ALL 111 ' R- RAIL 185 MILES RAIL: 1.54 WATER: RATE: 2.35 KATEi TOTAL: 2.35 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or -Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 547 Barqe TOTAL Cost per N et To n .22 2.01 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 59 COMMODITY DEAR OR I G 1 1*. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Bituminous Coal, Lignite TONNAGE. (SHORT TOi'S) 58940 B EAR D E S T I NAT I ON -Minneapolis, Minn Uniontown, Kentucky L. Ohio 4.03 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 6.24 ALL RAIL MILES U.U. Miss 771 RAIL: 4.03 WATER: TOT AT •■ 4.03 RAH..: 6.24 WATER : TOTAL: 6.24 RIVER ROUTE (Barc o, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ____' ,__ HA.^DL I K'G AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1199 TOTAL Cost per \ et 3. 91 ' i .53 J 4.44 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 60 TRAIT IC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS CONMOD I TV 81t " mi "°^ Coal, Lignite mm ^ (smRT Jm ) 30306 Ceredo, West Virginia BEAR ORIGIN ° BEAR DESTINATION -Cicero, .Illinois , nATT . M. Ohio I MIL: IU< R< VARIABLE: 2.62 RA fL FULLY ALLOCATED 4 - 05 M'LES 44J_ AST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RA]L: 2 ' 62 WATER; T nT/, y 2.62 FULLY AT.t.opatfp RAIL : | _WAX£Ci_P- TOTAL: 4. 05 RIVER ROUTE (Barce, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost: per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1211 Barg< HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS TOTAL 1.7Q .55 4.34 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 10 Cost Sheet oj TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY BEAR OR I Gil ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Bituminous Coal, Lignite tJ Ceredo, West Virginia TONNAGE (SHORT TONS! 13788 M. Ohio BEAR DESTINATION Chicago,, Illinois 111. R. 2.62 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST CaST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE 4.05 ALL RAIL MILES 441 RAIL: • 2.62 WATER : ■prvrAy • 2.62 RAIL: 4.05 . WATER: 0. TOTAL: 4.05 FULLY ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck ) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 915 Barge TOTAL REMARKS Cost per Net . ! 3.84 .56 4.40 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 62 . TRArnc survey COST COMMODITY Bituminous Coal, Lignite ANAI YSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 13757 BEAR ORIGIN G " nd RiVGrS ' KentUck * DEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minnesota RAIL: Tenn - R - VARIABLE: ' 21 All U.U. Miss. PAIL 6.53 FULLY ALLOCATED MILES 815 ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARTARi.E RAIL:. 4.21 WATER: T n TAI ■ 4 21 FIIT.T.Y AT.T.nrATfp RAIL: 6 ' 53 WATirp: ° T0 '^L: fi „ RIVER ROUTE (Barqe CHARGE TO RIVER , Barqe-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net Ton HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 848 Barqe on ■HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER . sn TOTAL 4.33 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Co s t Sheet 63 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY" BEAR ORIG ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: COST ANALYSIS Bituminous Coal, Lignite M Florence, Alabama Tenn. R. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY .ALLOCATED 3.19 4.92 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 16486 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, .Illinois ALL 11 !: R- RAIL MILES 573 RAIL: 3.19 WATER: TOTAV 3.19 RAIL: 4.92 WATER" TOTAL : 4.92 RIVER 'ROUTE ( Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1058 Barqo TOTAL Cost per Not 1 i 3.14 .42 3.56 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Shee_t 64 TR AFFIC SURVEY CO ST ANALYSIS CCNHODITY Bituminous Coal, Lignite TONNAGE (SHORT TOMS) A/ | 53/ | BEAR PRIG IK' Rochester, Kentucky BEAR DESTINATION A1ma; Illinois BEAR DEST|NAT|0N , St . P^ul, Minnesota RAIL: u - u - Miss. ALL VARIABLE: 7.58 RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED 10.02 MILES 531 ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 7 - 58 WATER: T^ AT.- 7.58 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 10-02 WATER : ° TOTAL: 1Q. Q2 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 648 Barge 2 .qn HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ' OTHER 39 TOTAL 3.29 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 73 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline BEAR ORIGI ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Hartford, Illinios L.U. Miss. 2.79 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 3.92 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 8123Q BEAR DESTINATION Quincy, Illinois U.U. Miss ALL RAIL MILES 117 RAIL: 2.79 WATER : T°TAL • 2.79 1 RAIL: 3.92 WATER : TOTAL: 3.92 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 129 Barge Cost per Net REMARKS : TOTAL -£2- .08 .90 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 74 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline BEAR ORIGIN Hartford » Illinois | RAIL: VARIABLE : L.U. Miss 3.67 FULLY ALLOCATED AST COST ALTERNATIVE: 4.79 VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL 3.67 RAIL 4.79 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1861A8 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero_ Illinois 111. R. All RAIL MILES 253 WATER: TOTAL: 3.67 MATER : ° TOTAL: 4.79 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER . HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 336 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 1.65 .20 1.85 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 75 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Gasoline COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 60135 BEAR ORIGIN St " Loui s, Missouri L.U. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 3.10 4.31 RAIL: 3.10 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 4.31 BEAR DESTINATION -Canton. -Missouri U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 144 WATER ; TOTAL 3.10 WATER : TOTAL: 4.31 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ___ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 165 Barge Cost per Net T 31. TOTAL .10 1.07 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 76 COMMODITY Gasoline TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 25270? BEAR ORIGIN Hartf ord, Illinois RAIL: VARIABLE: L.U. Miss, FULLY ALLOCATED >T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 2.1 7 2.90 RAIL: 2.17 FULLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: 2 - 90 BEAR DESTINATION North -Pekin, ni, •„„; ,■ att in - R - ALL RA I L MILES I" WATER : WATER ; 2_ TOTAL : 2_J,7_ TOTAL 2*%£L RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 287 Barge TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 1.03 10 1.13 10 Cost Sheet 77 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline BEAR ORIGIN St ' Louls > Missouri L.U. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 3. Q 3 4.22 RAIL: 3.03 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 4.22 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 11896 BEAR DESTINATION LaGrange., Missouri U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 138 WATE R; TOTAL : 3.03 WATER : TOTAL: 4.22 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net Tr CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 160 Barge ^25. .09 TOTAL 1.04 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 78 COMMODITY GasoJ Line TRAFF COST IC SURVEY ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHOR- BEAR DESTINAT r TONS) 1 ON A 27225 BEAR ORIGIN St ' Louis ^ , Missouri Lbany_, Illinois RAIL: L ' U - variable;: Miss. E: 4.46 U ALL RAIL MILES .U. Mi TDTAJ ' ss. FULLY ALLOCATED 6.02 , 256 I COST ALTERNATIV VARIABLE RAIL: 4.46 WATER : . 4.46 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 6.02 WATFP : TOTAL : 6.02 CHARGE TO RIVER RIVER ROUTE ORIGIN DESTINATION (Barqe , Barqe-Rail Miles or Truck) Mode Cost per Met Ton HANDLING AT RIVER LIME-HAUL CHARGE 383 Barge 1.64 HANDLING AT RIVER CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .20 TOTAL 1.84 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 79 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Ostrica, Louisiana L. Miss. 11.75 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 15.70 RAIL: 2.54 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 3.37 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) mo* BEAR DESTINATION ■ NorthiPplHn, t U j WATER WATER 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 905 2 - 78 TOTAL: ' 5.3; 3.22 TOTAL 6.59 RIVER ROUTE (Barce, Barge-Rail or Truck', Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1307 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net ■ 3.74 .56 4.30 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 80 TRArnc SURVEY COMMODITY BEAR ORIGI I RAIL: VARIABLE : Gasoline Norco, Louisiana L. Miss, FULLY ALLOCATED @ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 17426 13.44 17.05 6.34 FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL 8.44 BEAR DESTINATION Black : River, Wisconsin u. ,U. Miss ALL RAIL MILES 1112 WATER: 2.56 -TOTAL 1.90 T -7ATEI'. : 2.96 TOTAL: n.40 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT Rl VER OR I GIN _ ' LIKE-HAUL CHARGE _ HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION _ CHARGE EX RIVER _ OTHER 1526 Barge TOTAL Cost: per Net T on 4.81 71 5.52 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 81 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gasoline DCAR 0RIGII!_ ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: St. Louis, Missouri L.U. Miss. 3.50 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE . FULLY ALLOCATED 4.57 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2681 5 BEAR DESTINATION Bettendorf, Iowa U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 234 RAIL: ■ 3.50 WATER: TOTAL- 3.50 RAIL: 4.57 HATER • TOTAL : 4.57 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 311 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Net To 1.55 .19 1.74 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 82 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TOMS) 20362 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford > Illinois BEAR ESTIMATION Winona, Minnesota RAIL: L ' U - MiSS - U.U. Miss. VARIABLE : 6.40 ; R ^ MILES 428 FULLY ALLOCATED 8 - 52 E COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 6.40 WATER: Q T n T M .- 6 ' 40 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 8 - 52 wat EP : TOTAL: 8 . 52 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER '■ HANDL I NG AT RIVER OR I G I N _J LINE-HAUL CHARGE 527 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION " CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL 2 .42 .31 2, .73 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 83 CCf.MODITY Gasoline BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Beaumont, Texas W2-GIWW FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST CO.ST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL: TRAFFIC SU RVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 58535 13.28 17.00 3.50 6.02 BEAR D ESTIMATION Bettenriorf, Iowa U.U. Miss. All RAIL MILES 1000 WATER : 3.57 TOTAL 7,07 -KA TE R : 4-!3 TOTAL: 10-15 RIVER ROUTE (Barqe, Barqe-Rail or Truck) Mi les CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LIME-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1458 Mode Barqe TOTAL Cost per Met' 4 .97 .74 5 71 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARK S 6 10 Cost Sheet 84 CCf.MODITY Gaso1 .ine TRA_rr COST Ai SURVEY x'ALYS IS TONNAGE (SHORT BEAR DESTINATI TONS) 9<>40 0|.; St. Louis BEAR ORIGIN Channahan > Illinois , M i SSOU r i lAIL: VARIAR 111. R. LE : ALLOCATED ALTERNATIVE: p.t.f. 3.42 L. ALL RAIL MILES . U. Miss 4.48 ; 231 FULLY . Tf)T/,J • T COST varia: RAIL: 3.42 WATER: 3.42 FULLY. ALLOCATED TO RIVER , ! G AT RIVER \UL CHARGE 4G AT RIVER EX RIVER RAIL: RIVER ROUTE OR I G 1 N DESTINATION 4.48 (Barae L T VTE n : TOTAL: 4.48 CHARGE M Barqe-Rai 1 lies or Truck) Mode Cost per Net Ton H A -i D L 1 i LINE-H/ 320 Barqe 1.51 HAND LI i CHARGE OTHER * .19 TOTAL 1.70 REMARKS EXPLANAT ION OF REF ER ENCE M ARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 85 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Jet Fuel EEAR ORIGIN Hartford » Illinois TT „,„ L.U. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: , FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 7.63 1.76 TOHMAGE. (SHORT TONS) 38825 BEAR D ES T I ! !AT I ON St. Paul, Minnesota U.U. Miss. 536 ALL RAIL MILES RAIL: 7.63 WATER: T^TAJ •• 7.63 RAIL: 8.76 WVTER : TOTAL : 8.76 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Baroe-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER „, HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 647 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Met 1 ' 2.89 .39 3.28 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 86 COMMODITY Jet Fuel BEAR ORIGIN RAIL: VARIABLE: Atreco, Texas W2-GIWW FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 13.69 17.47 3.91 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 5.10 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2059 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero. Illinois 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 1041 WAT El 3.57 JtlAXEK 4.13 TOTAi 7.41 TOTAL : 9.23 RIVER ROU TE (Barge , Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1507 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 5.67 86 6.53 EXPLANATION -OF REFERENCE NARKS 10 Cost Sheet 87 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Kerosene BEAR OR I G I M Violet, Louisiana L. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 13.51 17.29 RAIL: 5.57 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 7.21 TONNAGE (SHORT TOMS) 7593 BEAR DESTINATION Black River, Wiscon Ali J.U. Miss RAIL MILES 1128 WATER : 2.64 WATEK 3.06 -TOTAL 8.21 T0TAI " 10.27 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ; ,. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE- HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1565 iroe REMARKS TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. CosL per Net: 4.90 73 5.63 10 G °st Sheei COMMODITY Kerosene TR AFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS . TONNAGE (SHORT TOWS) 1841 BEAR ORIGIN New Orleans, Louisiana L. Miss. RAIL: VARIABLE: 13.41 FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE; VARIABLE 17.16 RAIL 5.57 FULLY ALLOCATED . RAIL: 7.21 BEAR DESTINATION Black River, Wisconsin U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES H20 HATERj il^ jocu .21 -LIAXJiPJ 3.06 TOTAL: 10.27 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS: 1564 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 4.89 .73 5.62 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 89 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY • BEAR ORIG ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Kerosene M Norco, Louisiana L. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED COST ANALYSIS 14.72 18.83 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 7983 BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minnes otj U.U. Miss. ALL RA I L MILES 12 33 RAIL: 8.29 WATER : 2.56 TOTAL- 10.95 RAIL: 12.59 HATER : 2.96 TOTAL : 15.55 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER _ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1672 Barge REMARKS TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost per Met 5.39 .80 6.19 G °st Sheet 90 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST AIM LYSIS COMMODITY Kerosene TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) i A?? BEAR ORIGIN Norco, Louisiana BEAR DESTINATION RAIL: L * MiSS ' U.U. Miss VARIABLE: 13 ' 32 r^L Black -River, Wisconsin 17.05 MILES 1112 FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE: •VARIABLE ^ IL: 5 ' 57 U'A TFR: 2.56 T OTAL- 8 - 13 FULLY ATrnrATPn RAIL: 7 ' 21 1JAT1 ?P ; 2.96 TOTAL: 10, 17 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barac-Rail or .Truck) . ■ M i 1 e s Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1526 Barqc HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 4 .81 .71 5, .52 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet gi TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Kerosene TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5347 BEAR ORIGIN Mount Vernon, Indiana BEAR DESTINATION Cicero:, Illinois j L. Ohio m> R _ , c/ ALL VARIABLE : I_d* RA I L ALL RAIL: .BLE : 5.85 MILES 211 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: 4.54 WATER: TOTAL- 4.54 FAIL: 5.85 WATER-' TOTAL: 5.85 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Bar g e-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net " ) CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE ,678 Barge 2.63 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION _____ CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER -36 TOTAL 2 ' 97 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE M ARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 92 COMMODITY Kerosene TRAFfir SURVTY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TOiJS) 1506 BEAR ORIGIN. RAIL: VARIABLE: Mount Vernon, Indiana L. Ohio FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 3.87 5.03 BEAR DESTINATION Peoria, Illinois 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 198 RAIL: 3.87 WATER : T n Tf\T • 3.87 RAIL: 5.03 WATER : TOTAL: 5.03 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 531 Barge Cost per Net Ton 2.05 25 TOTAL 2.30 EXPLANATION -OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost .Sheet 93 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY BEAR ORIGI ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Kerosene Beaumont, Texas W2-GIWW fully allocated least cost alternative; "variable RAIL: COST ANALYSIS 13.28 17.00 3.50 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL .02 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2392 BEAR DESTINATION Bettendorf, Iowa u U. Miss . ALL RAIL MILES 1000 WA TER: 3.57 TOTAL 7.07 wvn-R'' 4.13 TOTAL: 10 .i 5 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER . HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1458 Barge TOTAL Cost: per Net 4.98 .74 5.72 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERE NC E MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 94 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Kerosene BEAR ORIGI RAIL: VARIABLE: Beaumont, Texas W2-GIWW FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: " VARIABLE RAIL: COST AN ALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 4827 17.49 22.24 8.29 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAT.] 12.59 BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul-, Minnesoi-n U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 1329 WATER : 3.57 - TOTAL : 11. WATER 4.13 TOTAL: 16.72 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER m HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1815 Barqe TOTAL Cost: per Net Ton 6.40 96 7.36 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 95 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : Kerosene Beaumont, Texas W2-GIWW FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED COST ANALYSIS 13.02 19.63 11410 TONNAGE. (SHORT TONS) DEAR DESTINATION Black .River, Wiscc|4 U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 1187 RAIL: 6.34 WATER: 3.57 TOTA) • 9.91 RAIL: 8.44 I-7ATER : 4.13 TOTAL : 12.57' RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi 1 e s Mode CHARGE TO RIVER vm \ nm .__ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1669 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Net ■ 5 .82 1 .87 6. 69 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 96 COMMODITY Kerosene BEAR ORIGIN, L RAIL: VARIABLE: Beaumont, Texas W2-GIWW FULLY ALLOCATED AST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE ikai h ic survcy COST ANALYSIS 13.25 17.46 FULLY ALLOCATED TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3637 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, Illinois 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 1091 RAIL: 4.01 WATER : 3.57 TOTA7 • • 7.58 , • RAIL: 5.23 WATER : 4.13 TOTAL: 9.36 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1507 Barge TOTAL Cost per N et Ton 5.17 .78 5.95 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 10 Cost Sheet 97 TR AIT I C SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas 011> Fuel 0il TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 176893 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford > Illinois BEAR DEST | t . ATI0N North Jekin, Illi j L.U. Miss. m< R> 2.29 ALL ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: . "~" RAIL 3.05 MILES 130 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: • 2.29 WATER : T OT AL' 2.29 RAIL: 3.05 WATER : TOTAL : 3.05 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode . Cost per Met CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 178 Barge 1,02 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ; CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER -11 TOTAL 1 - 13 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 98 TRAFFIC SURVr.Y COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN RAIL: VARIABLE: St. Louis, Missouri L.U. Miss. 4.46 fully allocated ;t cost alternative variable FULLY ALLOCATED 6.07 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 31683 BEAR DESTINATION Albany:, Illinois U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL 256 MILES RAIL: . 4.46 WATER: TOT^I • 4.46 , RAIL: 6.07 ... WATER : , TOTAL : 6.07 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 333 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 1.64 .20 1.84 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 99 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE Hartford, Illinois L.U. Miss. 2.79 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST CHST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 3.92 RAIL: 2.79 FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL: 3.92 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 32580 BEAR DESTINATION Quincyj Illinois u.u. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 117 WATER: TOTAL 2.79 JiAXE£-L TOTAL : 3.9? RIVER 'ROUTE ( Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 128 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Met 1 .82 .08 .90 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet iqo TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas oi l> Fuel TONNAGE. (SHORT TONS) 18583 BEAR ORIGIN Violet, Louisiana BEAR DESTINATION Black River, Wiscons in Kail: l ' Miss - 13.15 u.u. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 1128 VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED 16.93 iST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE MIL: 6 ' 36 WATER: 2 ' 64 ^tat ■• 9 - 00 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL : 8.46 i-jat p^.: 3.06 TOTAL: n>52 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LI.NE-HAUL CHARGE 1565 . Barge 4.90 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ; CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER I - 73 5.63 TOTAL REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 101 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS CCEHODITY Gas 0il » Fuel oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1841 BEAR PRIG 1 1! New 0rleans » Louisiana BEAR DESTINATION Black River, Wisco . 1 ALL RAIL: L ' Miss - U.U. Miss. All VARIABLE: 13,41 RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED 17.16 MILES 112 ° RAIL: 6.36 WATER : 2.64 THTAL • 9.00 RAIL: 8.46 V'\TF1 : 3.06 TOTAL : 11.52 • LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER i>>mm _ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1564 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost P = r Net' ' 4 .89 1 - .73 5 62 Cost Sheetl02 COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANA LYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 4763 BEAR ORIGIN Mem P his » Tennessee RAIL: VARIABLE: M. Miss. DEAR DESTINATION Lyons,. Iowa U.U. Miss. 7.59 FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: ■VARIABLE 9.75 ALL RAIL MILES 591 RAIL: 4.93 WAT)' R : 1.24 TOTAL 6.17 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL 6.54 WATERJ 1.40 TOTAL: 7.94 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Baroe-Rail or .Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER RE HARKS : 747 TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 2.78 36 3.14 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 103 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas 0il » Fuel 0il TONNAGE- (SHORT TOMS) 7208 BEAR ORIGIN St ' Louis > Missouri BEAR PEST 1 NAT I Of-! Bettendorf, Iowa ALL RAIL: L.U. Miss. ATT U.U. Miss ALL "•" w RAIL MILES 428 6.38 8.50 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: r „„ r> . TT 6.38 6 38 VARIABLE RAlh : JCATEJij TOTAL: ' FULLY ALLOCATED- RAIL: 8 '50 ,..rr .= TQTAL: 8^50. RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE J Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 312 . Ram* 1-56 .18 TOTAL 1.74 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REF E RENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 104 TRAFriC SURVJIY COMMODITY BEAR ORIGI L RAIL: VARIABLE: COST AIJALYSI Gas Oil, Fuel Oil St. Louis, Missouri L.U. Miss, 4.49 FULLY ALLOCATED AST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 6.07 TONNAGE. (SHORT T0i!5) 6055 BEAR DESTINATION Fulton, Illinois u.u. Miss. All rail MILES 263 RAIL: 4.49 WAT}' R : TOT AT •• 4.49 RAIL: 6.07 WATER : TOTAL : 6.07 344 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER -Doiraittw _ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 1.69 .20 1.89 REMARKS : EXPLAN AT ION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 105 TRAfTIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN St " Louis » Missouri L.U. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 6.51 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 8.66 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS ) 3149 BEAR DESTINATION Winona, Minnesota U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 439 RAIL: 6.51 WATER. T<">TAL • 6. SI RAIL: 8.66 WATER : TOTAL : 8.66 TOTAL RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode " Cost: per Net CHARGE TO RIVER [ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ■ ' ' LINE-HAUL CHARGE 549 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ; CHARGE EX RIVER . ' OTHER 2.50 .33 2.83 REMARKS EXPLANATION - O F REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 106 TR AFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COfrMOD I TY Gas Oil» Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN St - Louis, Missouri L.U. Miss. I RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED ^ST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE 3.87 5.30 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 21975 BEAR DESTINATION Burlington, Town U.U. Miss. All _ RA I L MILES 211 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 3.87 WATER : TDTA.J • 3.87 RAIL: 5.30 ■ ... WATER : TOTAL : 5.30 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 228 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 1.22 Ik. 1.36 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 107 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: St. Louis, Missouri L.U. Miss. 2.42 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 3.21 RAIL: 2.42 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 3.21 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 84317 BEAR DESTINATION Kingston Mines WATER: TOTAL: -WATER : TOTAL : '4 111. R. ALL RAIL 141 MILES ? 42 3.21 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 186 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net 1 1.05 : .11 1.16 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 108 TRAfTIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY, BEAR ORIGI RAIL: VARIABLE: Gas Oil, Fuel Oil St. Louis, Missouri L.U. Miss. 4.67 FULLY ALLOCATED k ST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE 6.33 RAIL 4.67 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2419 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL 6.33 BEAR DESTINATION Albany., Illinois U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 274 WATER TOTAL 4.67 WATER. TOTAL: 6.33 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 333 Barge TOTAL Cost per Met Ton 1.64 .20 1.84 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet I 09 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : Hartford, Illinois L.U. Miss 2.17 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 2.90 RAIL: 2.17 FULLY ALLOCATED - RAIL: 2.90 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5789 BEAR DESTINATION North Pekin, IllinJ 111. R. All RAIL MILES 119 WATER ; TOTAL 2.17 WATER : TOTAL: 2.90 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 181 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net 1.03 .11 1.14 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 110 TRA FFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas 0il » Fuel 0il TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 4917 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford » Illinois BEAR DEST|NAT|QN Albany,, Illinois L.U. Miss. 7T „ M . L RAIL: u - u - Miss. 4.41 ALL VARIABLE : RA | L FULLY ALLOCATED MILES 252 VST COST ALTERNATIVE: , 71 4.41 4.41 TOTAL : VARIABLE RAIL: WATER : FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: ^ wa TF R : g TOTAL: 6 .02 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 313 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL 1 .56 .19 1. ,75 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 111 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COM MOD I TY Gas oil » Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN Har tford, Illinois L.U. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 2.17 2.90 RAIL: 2.17 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 2.90 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 11128 BEAR DESTINATION North Pakin, Illino 111. R. ALL RA I L MILES H9 WATER : 2.17 XQIAL WATER TOTAL: 2.90 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 179 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Tr 1 .02 .11 1 .13 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 112 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN. RAIL: VARIABLE : Hartford, Illinois L.U. Miss. 7.57 FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 10.02 RAIL: 7.57 FULLY ALLOCATED . RAIL: 10.02 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2386 BEAR DESTINATION Minnes . ota River, Minn o U.U. Miss. All RA I L MILES 531 WATER: -TOTAL 7.57 -MATER : TOTAL: 10.02 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ___ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 660 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 2.95 .39 3.34 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 113 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Hartford, Illinois L.U. Miss. 3.89 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 5.32 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5828 BEAR DESTINATION Davenport , Iowa U.U. Miss. ALL RA I L MILES 2QQ RAIL: 3.89 WATER : TOTAL- 3.89 RAIL: 5.32 WATER 1 TOTAL: 5.32 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 285 REMARKS : Barge Cost per Net ' ) TOTAL 1.45 17 1.62 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet !]£ IRAN IC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas 0il ' Fuel 0il BEAR ORIGIN RAIL: VARIABLE: Hartford, Illinois L.U. Miss FULLY ALLOCATED 5T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 4.46 6.06 4.46 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 6 ' 6 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 9362 BEAR DESTINATION Clinton, _ low; U.U. Miss ALL RAIL MILES 255 WATER : TOT/lL 4.46 WATER : TOTAL: 6 . 06 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 320 Barge TOTAL 1.59 .19 1.78 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 115 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : Hartford, Illinois L.U. Miss 3.67 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 4.79 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 24278 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, Illinois 111. R. All RAIL MILES 253 RAIL: 3.67 WATER : T n TAI • 3.67 RAIL: 4.79 WATER : TOTAL: 4.79 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER -__„»__ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 335 Barge REMARKS TOTAL Cost per Net Toi 1.65 .20 1.85 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 116 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas 0il > Fuel oil BEAR ORIGIN Mount Vernon, Indiana RAIL: VARIABLE: L. Ohio 4.31 FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 5.87 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2681 BEAR DESTINATION Rock Island, Illinoi s U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 357 RAIL: 4.31 WATER: T n TAT • 4.31 RAIL: 5.87 WATER " TOTAL : 5.87 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ' LINE-HAUL CHARGE 584 Barge 2.46 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ' OTHER ' .31 TOTAL 2 -77 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost s heet 117 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY BEAR ORIGIi ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : COST ANALYSIS Gas Oil, Fuel Oil Mount Vernon, Indiana L. Ohio FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 5.31 6.62 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 22464 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, .Illinois 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 211 RAIL: 5.31 WATER : n TOTAL- 5 ^1 RAIL: 6.62 WATER : TOTAL : 6.62 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck] Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER _»«_ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 628 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net T" 1 2.64 .34 2.98 RE MARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet ]j g COMMODITY Gas oil > Fuel 0il TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 7228 BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont ' Texas BEAR DESTINATION LaGrange, Missouri RAIL: W2 " GIWW VARIABLE: U. 14.22 ALL RAIL U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED 18.14 M ' LES 1070 5T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARTATU.F. RA 11 ^ 3.13 3.57 WATER: 6.70 TOTAT • FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 4 ' 35 uATpp: 4.13 TOTAL: 8 .48 RIVER ROUTE CHARGE TO RIVER (Barqe, Barqe-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net Ton HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE "07 Bar g e 4.37 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .65 TOTAL 5.02 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 119 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY ^as Oil » Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : Beaumont, Texas W2-GIWW FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: COST ANALYSIS FULLY ALLOCATED- RAIL: 17.49 22.24 i.29 12.59 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5264 BEAR DESTINATION St. PauL, Minnesota U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 132 9 3.57 WATER: 11.; TOTAL : HATER : 4.13 TOTAL: 16.72 RIVER- ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met Tor CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1815 Barge 6.40 95 TOTAL 7.35 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 120 TRAfriC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1Q6QQ BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Texas BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, Illinois 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 1091 W2-GIWW RAIL: in - R - 11 fi£ ALL VARIABLE : __ RA I L FULLY ALLOCATED 17.47 3T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 4,Q1 WATER: 3 ' 57 T ota T • 7 - 58 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 5.23 WAT ER : 4 ' 13 T ° TAL: 9.36 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER _________ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE ______ Barge 5 - 15 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : .77 TOTAL 5.92 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 121 COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : Port Authur, Texas TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 33838 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero „' Illinois W2-GIWW 14.32 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 18.32 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 114 9 RAIL: 4.01 WATER : 3.61 T^TAL ' 7.62 RAIL: 5.23 - -. WATER : 4.17 TOTAL: 9.40 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ___ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1507 REMARKS : Barge TOTAL Cost per Net T r 5.17 .77 5.94 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 122 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 6 ]66 BEAR ORIGIN Port Authur, Texas BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, niinni. RAIL: ' W2 " GIWW 111. R. VARIABLE: LH.il RAIL MILES 1149 FULLY ALLOCATED 18.32 RAIL: 4.01 WATER : 3.61 T n TAL • 7.62 RAIL: 5.23 . , WATER : 4.17 TOTAL : 9.40 5T COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED . RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ; LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1514 Barge 5 - 20 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER ' ' 78 TOTAL 5.98 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 123 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Gas Oil, Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Cicero, Illinois 111. R. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: COST ANALYSIS 2.91 3.83 2.91 FULLY ALLOCATED- RAIL: 3.83 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3124 BEAR DESTINATION St. Louis, Missouri L.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 185 WATER: TOTAL 2.91 WATER- TOTAL: 3. 83 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER — _^_ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 351 Barge TOTAL Cost per Met To 1.64 .20 1.84 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 124 I TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSI S COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) ]? 1? BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, Illinois BEAR DESTINATION Peru. 411 inm L RAIL: L ' U - Miss ' 111. R. 3.04 ALL VARIABLE : £^ RA I L MILES 1 - 97 FULLY ALLOCATED 4 *°° AST COST ALTERNATIVE: 3.04 A 3.04 VARIABLE RAIL: WATER TOTAL FULLY AT.T.OPATPn RAIL: j- OO uatp R : ° T0TAL: ^.00 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 242 Barge 1.28 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .14 TOTAL 1.42 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 125 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: L -U- Miss VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED Hartford, Illinois 3.04 4.00 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 13964 BEAR DESTINATION P er ", Illinois ALL R. RAIL MILES 197 RAIL: 3.04 WATER: T<">TAL • 3.04 RAIL: 4.00 WATER : TOTAL : 4.00 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 242 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net T( 1.28 ■ .14 1.42 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 126 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 33055 BEAR ORIGIN Mount Vernon, Indiana L RAIL: VARIABLE: L. Ohio FULLY ALLOCATED KS1 COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED- 5.08 6.64 RAIL: 5.08 RAIL: 6 - 6 4 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero,, Illinois 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 357 WATER; TO TAX . 5.08 WATER : TOTAL: 6.64 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 635 Barge TOTAL 2.66 35 3.01 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 127 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : Violet, Louisiana L. Miss. 11.92 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 15.48 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 154521 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, Illinois 111. R. All RAIL MILES 938 RAIL: 4.01 WATER: 2.64 TDTAT ■ 6.65 RAIL: 5.23 WATER : 3.06 TOTAL : 8.29 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1396 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net To 4.22 .63 4.85 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 128 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN New Orleans, Louisiana L. Miss. 11.22 LL RAIL: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED JAST COST ALTERNATIVE: 14.37 VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED- RAIL: 4.01 RAIL: 5.23 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 10746 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero. -Illinois 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 930 WATER: 2 -62 T nTAy • 6.63 WATER 3.03 TOTAL: 8.26 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) M? les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1387 Barge TOTAL 4.21 .62 4.83 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 129 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 58673 BEAR ORIGIN Norco, Louisiana BE AR DESTINATION Cicero:, Illinois L. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : 11.08 14.20 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 918 RAIL: 4.01 WATER : 2.56 T<~>T/U -6.57 RAIL: 5.23 WATER : 2.96 TOTAL: 7.92 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net T - CHARGE TO RIVER -__ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN I LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1366 Barge 4.17 I HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER - 69 TOTAL 4.86 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 13 COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN Baton Rouge, Louisiana L . Mi s s . LL RAIL: 10 92 VARIABLE : ^ FULLY ALLOCATED EAST COST ALTERNATIVE; VARIABLE 13.98 RAIL: 4.01 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL 5.23 37,107 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, . Illionis 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 903 WATER 2.33 WATER 2.69 -TOTAL TOTAL 6.34 7.92 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER _ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1261 Barge TOTAL Cost per Met Ton 3.94 .57 4.51 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 131 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 12044 BEAR ORIGIN Baton Rouge, Louisiana BEAR DESTINATION Havana-. -T1 1 -i nn-i q 111. R. ALL RAIL _MILES 817 FULLY ALLOCATED ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : 9.96 12.76 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 2.55 WATER: 2.33 TOTAL 4. FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 3.38 JJATER : 2.69 TOTAL: 6.07 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Hode CHARGE TO RIVER . HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1059 Barge Cost per Net Tc 3.13 .46 TOTAL 3.59 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 132 TRAFFIC SURVHY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1422 BEAR ORIGIN Memphis, Tennessee BEAR DESTINATION Peru. -Illinoi. M . Mi s s LL RAIL: 111. R. 6.21 All VARIABLE : RA 1 1 MILES 48 1 FULLY ALLOCATED 8.02 2AST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 3 . 29 W ATER: 1.22 jnr^- h . 51 FULLY AT.T.nrATFn RAIL: 4 - 31 WATER : 1 .38 TOTAL: 5-69 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER _-_______—_. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 662 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : TOTAL 2 .45 .31 2, .76 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 133 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY COST Residual Fuel Oil ANALYSIS TONNAGE BEAR DES (SHOR T I NAT o T TONS) 7756 BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, Illinois ION • Cicero,. Illinois ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: L.U. Miss. 3.67 111. R. ALL RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED 4 - 79 MILES 253 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VAKTART.F RAIL: 3 ' 67 WATER: TOtaj • 3 -67 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 4 -?9 WATER : TOTAL: Ayq RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS: 335 Barge TOTAL Cost j>er Net T 1 .fiS .20 1.85 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 134 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5891 BEAR ORIGIN Ha ^ tf ° rd ' Illinois BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul ,, Minnesota L.U. Miss ,L RAIL: U.U. Miss. 7.57 ALL VARIABLE: ' • * ' RAIL in oa MILES 531 FULLY ALLOCATED 1U - 04 AST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE _ FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 10 -°* tjat F R : TOTAL: 10. 04 VARIABLE RAIL: WATER: ° tot at.- 7 ' 5 7 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ___ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 646 Barge 2.89 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .39 TOTAL 3.21 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 13 5 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : Mount Vernon, Indi, L. Ohio 5.08 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 6.64 RAIL: 5. 08 FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL: 6.64 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS! 55356 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, -Illinois 111. R. ALL - RAIL MILES 357 WATER: TOTAL 5.08 JiAXERj TOTAL : 6.64 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 634 Barge TOTAL Cost per Met I n 2.66 .35 3.01 L. EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 136 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1376 W2GIWW U. U. Miss VARIABLE: Ll '^ RAIL MILES 1329 BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Texas BEAR DESTINATION st. Pa»i r Min. oc . ta W2GIWW L RAIL: 17.49 FULLY ALLOCATED 22.24 ^ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE ML: *'^ WATER: 3 ' 57 totat ■ U - 86 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 12 ' 59 ua tf p : ^.13 TOTAL: 16.72 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1815 Barge 6.40 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER ' -96 TOTAL 7.36 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 137 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Gil BEAR ORIGIN Texas City, Texas W2GIWW ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 15.18 19.60 RAIL: 4.01 FULLY ALLOCATED - RAIL: 5.23 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS! 1410 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero., -Illinois 111. R. All RAIL MILES 1211 WATER : 3.91 TOTAL 7.92 WATERJ 4.53 TOTAL: 9 . 76 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS: 1583 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net T 5 . 5 2 ,83 6.35 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 133 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST AIJALYSIS C Of iM OD I TY Residual Fy-.el Oil BEAR ORIGIN Texas City, Texas "• W2GIWW L RAIL: VARIABLE: 15>18 FULLY ALLOCATED AST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 19.60 RAIL: 4-01 RAIL 5.23 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) B2 r >4 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, Illinois 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 1211 WATER: MkXEH. 3.91 TOTAL 7.92 4.53 TOTAL: 9.76 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1571 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 5. 47 .82 6.29 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 139 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMOD I TY Residual Fuel Oil BEAR QR | GUI Dolton, Ill inois ' 111, R. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE COST ANAL YSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TOWS) 156507 • BEAR DESTINATION 3.69 4.82 RAIL: 3.69 FULLY ALLOCATED - RATI, 4.82 Hartford. Tiling L. U. Miss. ALL RA I L MILES 255 WATER; Q_ -UAXElii 0_ JXOJIA ^J59_ TOTAL : 4.82 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 338 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net _Tc 1.62 --=•■ .20 1.82 REMARKS 5_ EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 140 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel Oil TONNAGE (SHORT TOMS) 48228 BEAR ORIGIN Corpus Chris ti, Texas GEAR DESTINATION Havana,. Illinois W3GIWW I RAIL: 111. R. 18.84 ALL VARIABLE : RAIL 22.11 MILES 1478 FULLY ALLOCATED •ST COST ALTERNATIVE " 2 -55 4.90 7.45 VARIABLE RAIL: WATER; _ FULLY. ALLOCATED- RAIL: 3 ' 38 u ^,: 5 .69 TOTAL: 9 .07 tota; RIVER ROUTE (Barg e , Barns-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Mot To n CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1596 Barge 5.69 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .89 TOTAL 6.58 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 141 TRAFFIC SU RVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Lubricatin g Oils. Graaae TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 74138 BEAR PRIG 1 11 Lake Charles, Louisiana BEAR DESTINATION Ci cero., Illin ois WIG 111. R. ALL RAIL: Al1 12 63 AUj VARIABLE: __._! RAIL MILE S g 84 FULLY ALLOCATED 16 .18 " " LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: • VARIABLE RAlh: 4 - 01 WslEKl 3 - 4 ^ X-QIAL^-Z-^ FULLY ALLOCATED MIL 5 ' 23 ,,»,„: 3.99 TOTAL: 9 . 22 RIVE R ROUTE (Barg e, Bnrgc-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode • Cost per Not Tc CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE ; 1481 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL 5.05 .75 5.80 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 142 TRAFFIC SURVEY C OST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Lubricating Oils, Grease TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 44889 BEAR ORIGIN Houston, Texas BEAR DESTINATION ' W2GIWW KAIL: 15.00 ALL ■MIIABLE : RA I L Indiana Harbor, TnAi ^n^ 111. R. FULLY ALLOCATED 19.16 MILES 1194 I COST ALTERNATIVE: LlIABLE RA"- 4 ' 35 V.'ATER: U ' U totm • 8 ' 47 hlLLY ALLOCATED RA IL: 5 ' 50 uatp r : 4.77 TOTAL: 1 0m27 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net To n CHARGE TO RIVER §\NDLING AT RIVER ORIGI LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1640 Barg e IanDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL 5 .67 .98 6 .65 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 143 TRAfriC SURVEY cor/r ANALYSIS COMMODITY Lubricating Oils, Grease TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 19414 BEAR 0RIGII-! Port Arthur, Texas BEAR PEST 1 HAT I ON Cicero ,- Illino-i s W2GIWW 111. R. ALL RAIL: 14.32 ALL VARIABLE: : RAIL MILES H49 FULLY ALLOCATED 18.32 ^ "" .ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 4 £L. KATERj, 3 ' 61 TOT AL-- 7.62. FULLY. ALLOCATED- IiATJ^_ 5 lB LLITXRJ ill! T0TALi 9.40 RIVER ROUTE ( Barge, 3arge-Rai1 or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost: per Met To CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1515 Barge 5.20 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ; CHARGE EX RIVER Of HER * .78 TOTAL 5.98 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 144 TRAFFIC SUR VEY COST ANALYSIS IQhMOD I TY Lubricating Oils. Greasp BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Texas ' W2GIWW RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE ' VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIT 17.49 22.24 1.27 . 12.57 TONNAGE (SHORT TOWS) 16103 BEAR PEST I NATION St. Paul, Minnesota U. U. Miss. All - RA I L MILES 1329 WATER: JiAZia: 3.57 4.13 _XQX 11. TOTAL: 16 . 70 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or- Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1815 Barge TOTAL Cost: per Met Ton 6.40 .95 7.35 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 145 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Lubricating Oils, Grease BEAR QR | CHI Indiana Harbor, Indiana ' 111. R. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FELLY ALLOCATED. 15.00 19.16 RAIL 4.35 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2040 BEAR DESTINATION Galena Park, Texas I W2GIWW ALL RA I L MILES H94 VMTER: 3.04 -XQXAL^- 7.39 RA1" 5.50 -EfATJ^l 3.52 TOTAL : 9.02 RIVER ROUTE (Barg e , Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER \ , < HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1641 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Net T 4.62 ; .69 5.31 REMARKS EXPLANATION -OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet Uft TRATFIC SURV EY COST ANALYSIS CONHOD ! 1 Y Lubricating Oils, Grease BEAR ORIGIN Indiana Harbor, Indiana 111. R. I RAIL: 3.92 variable: fully allocated It cost alternative -variable 5.08 HAIL: 3.92 FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL: 5.08 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1212. BEAR DESTINATION Hartford, I llinois L. U. Miss. WATER : UA'XXRl- ALL RAIL MILES 264 -1UXL TOTAL .3.92 5.08 RIVER ROUTE (Ba r go, Baroe-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 352 Bargo TOTAL Cost: per Net Ton 1.69 .21 1.89 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 147 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Aliphatic Naptha BEAR ORIGIN Hartford, Illinois L. U. Miss. RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 3.92 5.08 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5847 BEAR D ESTIMATION Indiana 111. R. ALL RA I L MILES 264 RATE: 3.92 WATER: T^TAL: 3.9? RAIL: 5.08 WATER : TOTAL : 5,08 RIVER ROUTE (Bar ge , Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 352 Sarqe TOTAL Cost per Net T 1 .7? .21 1.93 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 148 TRATFIC SURV EY COST AI M LYSI S COMMODITY Aliphatic Naptha TONNAGE (SHORT TOk'S) 7847 BEAR ORIGIN Houston, Texas BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, Illinois W26IWW RAIL: 1/ « ALL VARIABLE : 14.6 6 [28 tqtat . 6 ' 05 FULLY ALLOCATED ^ RAI L: 3 - 95 K?ATER : 3 * 75 TOTAL: 7>7Q RIVER ROUTE ( Borgo, Bomc-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost: per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE . 1639 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER ° REMARKS TOTAL 4.61 .68 5.29 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 10 Cost Sheet 173 TRAmC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Steel Mill Products BEAR ORIGIN South Chicago, Tllinois , IU> k> ALL RAIL: 2.77 VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED. 3.95 RAIL: 2.77 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 4458 BEAR DESTINATION ■ St * L ? uis ' Miss °ur L. U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 284 WA TER: RATI,: 3.95 wailt:- 2.77 TOTAL TOTAL : 3.95 R IVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode " Cost per Met T CHARGE TO RIVER —+J MX _- ; ______ HANDLING AT RIVER OR I GIM ._ LINE-HAUL CHARGE 3 70 Barqe HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL 1.72 .16 1.88 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 6 7. Cost Sheet l7 4 TRAfTic survi y COMMODITY DEAR OR 1 G I i .'_ RAIL: VARIABLE: CO ST ANALYSIS Steel Mill Products TONNAGE (SHORT TOWS) 1807 Gary, Indiana 111. R. FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: .VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED RA 1 L 6.66 9.69 2.77 3.95 BEAR DESTINATION New Orlean s, Louisiana L. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES GO WATER 1.63 WXAL 4.40 -HATER' 1.84 TOTAL 5.79 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Roil or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1406 Barge TOTAL Cost per Met Ton 2. 97 .42 3.39 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 175 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Iron and Steel Products BEAR ORIGIN South Chicago, Illinois ALL RAIL: VARIABLE 111. R. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST CDST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED. 7.75 11.31 RAIL 2.77 RAIL 3.95 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 277Q1 DEAR DESTINATION Houston^ Texas WATER -UAT-E W2GIWW ALL RAIL MILES 1112 3.28 3.75 TOTAL 6.05 TOTAL 7.70 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ^_. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1639 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net - 4.61 .68 5.29 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 176 TR AIT I C SURV EY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Iron Ore Concentrates TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) __±222SL Burnside ~TT. Miss . BEAR ORIGIN Burnside, Louisia na BEAR DESTINATION Indiana Jiarbor, Indiana 111. R. « RML: VARIABLE: °'°° RAIL 6.68 ALT. FULLY ALLOCATED 9 ' 72 kSl COST ALTERNATIVE: MILES 933 VARIABLE gAIL! 2 ' 77 WATKR . 2 ■ 71 TnTM . 5.48 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 3.95 WXERl 3.10 T0TA] UA'UUli J- 10 '"' 7 J)5_ RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost- per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ■ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN L I NE-HAUL CHARGE , 1335 ' Barge. 4.13 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER * .60 TOTAL 4 - 73 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 177 COMMODITY TRAT FIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Iron Ore Concentrates TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5717 BEAR ORIGIN Burnside , Louisiana L. Miss. ALL RAIL: " VARIABLE 6.68 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 9.72 RAIL: 2.77 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 3.95 BEAR DESTINATION Calumet Harbor- . timA 111. R. WATER: WATER ALL RAIL MILES 933 2.71 3.10 TOTAL TOTAL 3.48 7,05 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1332 Barqe TOTAL Cost per 1- et 'To 4.11 .61 4.72 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 10 Cost Sheet 178 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Manganese COST AMI YS IS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN RAIL: VARIABLE: Burnside, Louisiana L. Miss. 6.68 FULLY ALLOCATED ,ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 9.72 RAIL: 2.77 FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL: 3.95 1257 BEAR DESTINATION South Chi ca go, I llinois 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 33 WATER : 2.71 fAXEE- 3.10 TOTAL 5.48 TOTAL : 7.05 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1335 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 4.13 .60 4.73 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 179 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Manganese BCAR ORIGIN Pittsburgh, Pa. •" Mong. R~I ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED - RAIL: RAIL: COST ANALYSIS 5.89 ;.57 2.77 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1243 BEAR DESTINATION Gary, Indiana 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 442 WATER; 3.27 3.95 .LIAT-ERJ 3.74 .TOTAL; TOTAL : 6.04 7.69 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode - CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1542 REMARKS Barqa TOTAL Cost per Net Tc 4.68 70 5.38 EXPLANATION .OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost "Sheet 180 trait ic survey COST ANALYSIS . COI.KODITY Piq Iron TOIHIAGE BEAR DE< (SHORT TONS) 1586 BEAR OR 1 Gil! Sheffield , Alahama 4.54 IT 1 MAT ION Calumet Harbor, Illirv Term. R. RAIL: VARIABLE: 111 R. ALL RAIt FULLY ALLOCATED 6.56 MILES 578 ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VART ARM- RAIL: 2.77 WATER : 1.86 T nvM • 4.61 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 3.95 WATER : 2.05 TOTAL: 6>0Q RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Baroc-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LIME-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 849 Barqe TOTAL Cost per M c t Ton 3.15 .42 3.57 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet " 181 TRAFFIC SURV EY COf.T ANALYSIS COMMODITY Plg Ir ° n . TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 9192 BEAM OR I Gil! Sheffield, Alabama BEAR DESTINATION Calumet Harbor, Iiii, Term. R. 111. R. i ALL KAIL: 4.54 FULLY ALLOCATED 6.56 ALL VARIABLE: ._ RAIL MILES 578 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE 2 -77 TTAfm , n 1.86 4.63 JTQX " VARIABLE !^iilL_ 1 WA'j FULLY ALLOCATED RAlLi_ 3 ^ UAZUU 2.0 5 TOTAL: 6.0 __ RIVER ROUTE (Ba rge , Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode " Cost: per Net Tt CHARGE TO RIVER. i »~^— ._ __ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE . 849 Barge 3.15 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ' CHARGE EX RIVER Of HER .42 TOTAL 3.57 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 182 Tiu\rnc survey COMMODITY Industrial Chemi COST AIJAl YSIS cals TONNAGE BEAR DE< (SHORT TOMS) 99467 BEAR ORIGIN Lake Charles, L'ouisiana IT 1 NATION Joliet, Illinois W1GIWW RAIL: VARIABLE: 12.21 111. R. All RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED 15.64 MILES 946 ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 3.58 WATER: 3.50 7.08 T n T\] • FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 4.68 WATER : 4 * 04 TOTAL: 8 -?2 RIVER ROUTE (Ba rge , Barge-Rail or Truck) Mj les Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ^ _^ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ■ ' ' LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1448 Dargc 4 . 9] HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .74 TOTAL 5.65 REMARKS : EXPLANATION -OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 183 TRAFNC SURVEY COST ' ANALYSIS (SHORT TONS) 2431 COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE BEAR OR 1 Gil'! Lake Charles, Louisiana BEAR DES TINATION Joliet,_ Illinois \ ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: W1GIWW 12.21 111. R. ALL RAIL 15.64 FULLY ALLOCATED MILES 946 3.50 7.08 TOT Al •' LEAST COST ALTF.RN VARIABLE ATIVE: 3<58 RAIL: WATER : Fin.i.Y AiinrATrn RAIL: 4 ' 68 WATER : 4.68 TOTAL: 8.72 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck ) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER m __ , ■ ■ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ; ■ LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1448 Barg e 4.91 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER ' * - 74 TOTAL 5 * 65 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OP REFERENCE NARKS 10 Cost Sheet 184 COf'MOD I TY TRAFFIC SURVE Y COST ANALYSIS Industrial Chemical s TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 52320 BEAR ORIGIN Deer Park, Texa s W2GIWW RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED 14.03 18.74 T COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE _ RAT. 4.01 FULLY. ALLOCATE): RATE 5.23 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero., Illinois 111. R. WATER WATLSU ALL RAIL MILES 1161 4.14 4.79 TOTAL 8.15 TOTAL: 10 . 02 RIVER ROUTE (B-arg e, Baroe-Rail o r Truck) Mi le.s Mode . CHARGE TO RIVER -,.'„.-„.,. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1612 Barge Cost: per Net Tr.r 5.66 .85 TOTAL 6.51 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE iiARKS 10 Cost Sheet -^8=; TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals BEAR ORIGIN Norco, Louisiana L~; Miss. ALL RAJL: VARIABLE: 11.35 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST CO^T ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 14.52 RAIL: 4.01 FULLY ALLOCATED- RATL 5.23 TONNAGE. (SNORT TONS) 13732 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero,. Illinois 111. R. ALL RA I L MILES 940 WATER, 2 ' 61 THTAT- 6 - 62 3.01 TOTAL: 8.24 J-IAEEJ 1357 REMARKS : RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Barqe TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost per i et T ■ 4.13 .61 4.74 ■r Cost Sheet 186 TH AN IC SU RVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT T0i!S) 3000 ° BEAR ORIGIN Marmet, West Virginia BEAR DESTINATION Seneca, I llinois Kan. R. 111. r. RATI.: Q 87 ALL VARIABLE: 11°: RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED COST ALTERNATIVE 12.24 -MILES 578 4 - 58 2.23 6.81 TOTAL VARIABLE ^ A JAil WATE FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL; 5 ' 95 u^ THR : 2. 54 TOTAL: 8.49 . RIVER ROUTE (Bn rcq, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per i!et To n CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1256 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER 3.91 OTHER * .56 TOTAL 4.47 REMARKS : EXPLA NATION OF REFERENCE NARKS Cairo 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 187 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMOD I TY Industrial Chemicals BEAR ORIGIN Memphis, Tennessee "" W. Miss . ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED' 6.82 J. 79 lAIL: 4.01 RATE 5.23 5400 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION Lake Calumet. mi no ) 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 536 WATER : 1.28 HATER : 1.44 -TOTAL 5.29 TOTAL _6_.67_ RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost: per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER _^___ , HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN _. ' LINE-HAUL CHARGE . 765 Barge 2.86 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ■ CHARGE EX RIVER " ' OTHER - 38 TOTAL 3.24 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 188 TRAI TIC SU RVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY mr ^ trial C hcmiee^ TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 49692 BEAR ORIGIN Barfield, Arkansas BEAR DESTINATION Louis-iana. Mis^nnH M". Miss. U. U. Miss. RA1 L 5.27 6.87 ALL VARIABLE: RAIL .MILES FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: ' H_1_B___ ± ' W 1 QIA.I : 3 ' 6 5 FULLY. ALLOCATED KAIL: __£_ HATJEJli ___3 TOTAL : _^84 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barg e -Rail or Truck) Mi I e s Mode Cost per Net T on CHARGE TO RIVER ____„-»»_, - _ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN _. LINE-HAUL CHARGE -425 Barge 1-64 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER , - OTHER .19 TOTAL 1.83 REMARKS EXPLANATION 'OF REFERENCE NARKS 10 Cost Sheet 189 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE. (SHORT TONS) 55000 BEAR ORIGIN Am. Cyanimid Fortier Pit., La. BEAR DESTINATION Hannibal-. Missouri '" L. Miss. ALL RAIL: ■ VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 10.37 13.29 RAIL: 2.81 WATER FULLY ALLOCATED - RAIL: 3.96 -LLiTER. u. u. Miss. All RAIL MILES 848 2.63 -TOTAJ. : 5.44 3.04 TOTAL: 7 . RIV ER ROUTE (Bar go, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1159 Barqa TOTAL Cost per Net' Toi 3.32 .49 3.81 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 190 TRAFFIC S URVEY COST ANALY SIS C Of iM 00 I TY Sodium Hydroxide TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 15016 BEAR ORIGIN Geismar, Louisiana BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, Illi nois L. Miss. 111. R. RAIL: 11.37 ALL VARIABLE: RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED 14.86 T COST ALTERNATIVE: ■ VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED MILES 9 38 RAIL: 4.01 WATKR: 2.48 T n TiM • 6.49 RAIL: 5.23 . - WATER : ■ 2.86 TOTAL: 8.09 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or .Truck) Hi 1 e s Mode Cost per Net Ton :harge TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1317 Barge handling at river destination :harge ex river 4.08 DTHER ' .60 TOTAL 4.68 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 191 TRAITIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Coal Tar, ChfiffllcaJ E rod ucts TONNAGE (SHORT TOWS) 5 *79 BEAR PRIG H-! Deer Park, Texas BEAR DESTINATION Cicero. . Illinoi s W2GIWW ALL ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 14.16 RAIL MILES 1161 FULLY ALLOCATED 18.74 RAIL: 4.01 WATER : 4.14 TOTAI 8.15 RAIL: 5.23 WATER : 4.79 TOTAL 10.02 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED RIVER ROU T E (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode ' Cost per Net Toi CHARGE TO RIVER ■ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ' ' LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1612 Barge 5 .- 66 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ' CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .85 TOTAL 6.51 REMARKS EXPLANATION -OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 192 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST Ai COMMODITY Coal Tar, Chemical Products JALYS (S TONNAGE. BEAR DES (SHORT TOMS) 1748 BEAR ORIGIN New Orleans, Louisiana ► T 1 HAT 1 ON Joliet, Illinois L. Miss. RAIL: VARIABLE: 10,59 111. R. ALL RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED 13.57 MILES 874 ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE K ATL: WATER: 2-69 6.62 TO';''' •- 5.13 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: tfATHR : 3 < 11 TOTAL: 8.24 * RIVER ROUTE (Barce, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost- per Net To: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIi LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1371 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL 4 .12 .62 4 .74 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 10 Cost Sheet 193 tr a rnc survey COST ANALYST'S COMMODITY Coal Tar, Chemical ProcU; icts TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1264 DEAR ORIGIN Texas City, Texas BEAR DESTINATION ■ Cicero, Illinois ALL KAIL: VARIABLE: W2GIWW 15.56 111. R. ALL PAIL VTED 19 ' 98 MILES 1211 FULLY ALLOC' LEAST COST ALT]"".] ' VARIABLE lNATIVE: RATE: Ml 3.96 7 97 WATER; t otat • '*■ 5.23 FULLY ALLOCATED RATI,: ,,.vrr- 4 ' 58 T0TAL: 9 * 81 RIVER RO UTE (Barg e, Ba roc-Rai l or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER. — --^ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LIME-HAUL CHARGE . 1574 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 6 10 Cost ne r N< ?t " 5 .48 .82 6, .30 Cost Sheet l 9 * CC? MOD I TY TRAFFIC SURV EY COST ANALYSIS Coal Tar, Chemical Prodnrf-s TOMi.'AGE (SHORT TONS) 16Q65 BEAR QRIGIM corpus Christ! , Texas BEAR DESTINATION Treats I sland, ill W3GEWW I. RATI,: 1TLQ1S 111. R. ALL VARIABLE: tZl— RAIL o/ m MILES 1518 ITJLLY ALLOCATED Z ^' 19 ■\ST COST ALTERATIVE: VARIABLE j^Jli 3>85 WATER: 5 '^ t hta ; . 8-86 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 5 '° 3 p AT ri ,: 5 ' 79 TOTAL: 10.82 RI VER ROUTE (Barge, Baroe-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost: per Net Tnn CHARGE TO RIVER ^ ^ __^^ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LIME-HAUL CHARGE 1749 Barge 6.31 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ; CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .97 TOTAL 7.28 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 195 TRAfTlC S U RVEY COST 'A N'At YS.IS COMMODITY Alcohols TOI!i!AGE (SHORT TOMS ) 24368 BEAR ORIGIi! Baton Rouge, Louisiana BEAR PEST 1 MAT ION Cicero , Illinois 111. R. ALL RAIL: L ' Miss ALL VARIABLE: __ RAIL 1? go HUES 90 3 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: "VARIABLE H AIL: *' 01 ^YTJ^ J^ OTi ^^ FULLY ALLOCATED 1_MHJ S^23 WAXFJi: — T ° TA1 ' : hSL RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode ■ Cost p er Hot T CHARGE TO RIVER. ^^^^ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ' ' LIME-HAUL CHARGE . 1252 Barg e 3.91 I HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .57 TOTAL 4.48 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF PE EE RENC E MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 196 TRAIT I C SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Alcohols TONNAGE (SHORT TOWS) 2829 BEAR OKI GIN West Lake > Louisiana BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, ill- ■ WIG I WW IA1L: VARIABLE: ^'J± R ft[ 16.18 MILES ^84 FULLY ALLOCATED " ST COST ALTERNATIVE: , m ^•01 1 QS I nc VARIABLE RATI,: WATER: total ' * 96 5.23 TATA, . 9.80 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: WATER : ' TOTAL RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER m _ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN . ' LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1562 Barge' 5.43 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ; ; CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .81 TOTAL 6 - 24 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 197 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST Ai.'A LYSIS COMMODITY Alcohols BEAR ORIGIN. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Calumet Harbor, Illinois 111. R. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE _ FULLY. ALLOCATED 5.76 11.08 RAIL: 4.90 TONNAGE' (SHORT TONS) 70086 RAIL 6.36 BEAR DESTINATION st - -Albans, West Vi WATER JJAXEE "TCan. "RT ALL RAIL MILES 500 2.19 2.49 -XQTAI. 7.09 TOTAL: 8.85 RIVER ROUTE (Sarg e, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1310 TOTAL Cost: per Net 5.25 .71 5.96 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS Cairo 10 Cost Sheet 198 TRA FFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Alcohols BCAR OK ! G I H Plaquemine, Louisiana L. Miss." RAIL: VARIABLE: 16 * 80 FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE: •VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 21.44 RAIL: i.41 TOMi'AGC (SHORT TOMS) 3773 12.77 RATE: BEAR D E 5 T 1 1 ! A T I M Minne apolis, Minnesota U. U. Miss. ALL RA I L MILCS 1330 V/ATE 2.42 2.79 l^AT-E ■TOTAL •— 10.83 TOTAL: 15.56 RIVER R O UTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or -Truck) Mi les Mode Cose per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LI HE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER If HER REMARKS : 1599 Barqc 5.25 78 TOTAL 6.03 EXPLANATION OF REFE RENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 199 TRAFFIC SURVFY COMMODITY Sulphuric Acid COS'. C ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT iTINATI TONS) ON 21255 DF.AR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mis-s ;ouri BEAR DES Channahan . 11 ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: L. U. Miss. 3.90 ALL RAIL MILCS 111. R. 268 TOT AL: 3.90 TOTAL: 5 -q FULLY ALLOC/i TED 5.11 LEAST COST ALTER VARIABLE NATIVE: RAIL: 3.90 WATER : FELLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 5.11 WATER : RIVER ROUTE ( B arge, Barge-Rail or Truc k) M i 1 e s Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 329 Bar g o TOTAL REMARKS Cost per Net T< 1.63 .19 1.82 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 200 TRAIT 1C SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Sulphuric Acid BEAR OR I G I N Cincinnati, Ohio M. Ohio RAIL: VARIABLE: : FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED. 5.87 7.48 RAIL 3.16 RAIL: 4.36 TONNAGE (SHORT T0U5) BEAR DESTINATION 2051 WATER JJAXEJU Joligt, Illinois ALL RAIL MILES 111. R. 301 1.98 TOTAL- 5.14 2.24 TOTAL: 6.60 RIVER RC'J T E (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER „_«_ ■ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LIME-HAUL CHARGE 996 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER __ OTHER Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 3.30 .46 3.76 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 10 Cost Sheet 201 TRAFFIC SURVEY cos: COhMODITY Phosphate Rock BEAR ORIGIN Burnside, Louisiana I' ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) DEAR DESTINATION 4447 Ouirvcy, Illinois U. U. Miss. 861 L. Miss. ALL RAIL: VAHTALLE: 6 ' 51 ALL RAH. FULLY ALLOCATED 9 * 48 MILES TOT *.T • 5.12 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: "VARTAW.K RA1L: 2.41 WATER: 2.71 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 3 ' 32 VATPI.' 3 - 10 TOTAL: 6.42 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or- Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net T( CHARGE TO RIVER __,..„ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN _. ' LINE-HAUL CHARGE . UIO Barg e HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 3.23 .47 TOTAL 3.70 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 5_ 10 Cost Sheet 202 TRArnc SURVEY COST AIJAI YS T> COMMODITY Phosphate Rock TOlli-IAGE (SHORT TONS) 115305 BEAR ORIGIN Tampa, Florida DEAR DESTINATION Joliet, Illinois Open Water RAIL: VARIABLE: 8.62 111. R. ALL RAI L FULLY ALLOCATED 12.62 MILES H94 IT COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 2.45 WATER: 5.64 Tnrfy] . 8.09 FULLY AT.T.nrATFH RATI,: 3.42 WATPp! 6.49 TOTAL: 9.91 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HAk'DL li-1G AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1846 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Met Ton 6.75 1.05 7.80 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cos t Sheet 203 TRAfTtC SURVEY COST A NALYSIS COMMODITY Fertilizer & Fertilizer Ma t. TONNAGE (SHORT TOMS) 33600 DEAR ORIGIN Cicero, Illinois 111. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED 8.86 BEAR DESTINATION Tampa harbor , Flori Open Water ALL — RAIL MILES 1232 12.91 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE - VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATE RAIL: 2.69 WATER: 4.53 TOTAL • 7.22 :n RAIL: 3.74 WATER : 5.20 TOTAL : 8.94 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, B aroe -RoM or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Met T< CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE- HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1872 Barqe TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 5.69 .88 6.57 Cost Sheet 204 COMMODITY BEAR OR 1 G M RAIL: VARIARLE : FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE , traffic survey cost a nalysis tonnage (short tons) St. Louis, Missouri BEAR DESTINATION Nitroqenous Fertilizer 22155 L. U. Miss. 4.08 5.30 RAT 4.08 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL 5.30 Calumet Harbor, Tl li n o 111. River ALL RAIL MILES 284 WAT -iiAmi. TOT /m.; 4.08 TOTAL; 5.30 RIVER ROUTE (Barg e , Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les M ode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 360 REMARKS Barqe TOTAL Cost per Net To n 1.79 22 2.01 EXPLANATION -OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 205 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS C 01 -MOD I TY Superphosphate BEAR ORIGIN New Orleans, Louisiana L. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 11.28 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION 1240 14.43 South ^icflqn, Til 111. ALL RAIL MILES 930 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 4.01 WATER: 2.66 TOTAL- 6.67 RAIL: 5.23 WATER, : 3.07 TOTAL: 8.30 RIVER ROUTE (Oa.rge , 3a roc-Rail or Truck ) Hi I e s Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ■ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1386 Barac TOTAL Cost- per Net 1 4.21 .63 4.84 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 206 COMMODITY Superphosphate BEAR ORIGIN Harlem, Louisiana L. Miss. TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANA LYSIS TOIINAGE (SHORT TONS) 4161 BEAR DESTINATION s t. Paul, Minnesota n> u_ „. SAIL: , MPT , nTr . 16.50 ALL VARIABLE: . , RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED 21.35 MILES 13 36 T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE R.AIL: 8.2 9 HATER: 2 ; 76 T "T'. R: - 11 -05 FULLY AT .7 .nr atft) RATI: 12 - 57 vat p P . : 3 - 19 TOTAL: 15 . 76 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barac-RaM or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN Lli>!E-HAUL CHARGE 1743 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER 5.55 OTHER » . 83 TOTAL 6.38 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 207 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COJ-iMOD I TY Superphosphate Tenn BEAK ORIGIN, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE Florence, Alabama 7.60 9.77 RAIL: 2.84 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAT],: 4.23 TONNAGE (SHORT TOWS) 2990 BEAR DESTINATION Pal myra, Missouri U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 610 HATER: 1.45 1.65 TOT /. _. 4.29 TOTAL: 5 . 88 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Borne-Rail or 'Truck) Mi leg Mode CHARGE TO RIVER. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE ■ . HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 624 Barce TOTAL Cost per Net T 2.25 .27 2.52 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 208 COMMODITY Fertilizer-NEC BEAR ORIGIN L RAIL: VARIABLE: Houston, Texas W2dWW FULLY ALLOCATED AST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL: TRAFFIC S U RVEY COST ANAIYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3851A 14.41 18.43 3.64 4.68 BEAR DESTINATION Channahan, EllinoJ 111 ALL RAIL MILES 1147 WATER: 4.16 t"TAT.- 7 «0 WATER' 4.81 TOTAL: 9 42. RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truc k). Mi lcs Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1586 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton ^ . ^ .85 40 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 209 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Su § ar COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TOWS) 14643: BEAR ORIGIN Burnside, Louisiana ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : L. Miss, FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED 11.62 14.77 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, . Illinois 111 ALL RAIL MILES 933 RAIL: 2.43 WATER : 3.01 total- 5.44 RAIL: 3.65 .... .. WATER : 3.40 TOTAL : 7.05 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1331 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Toi 4. ,10 .60 4. 70 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 210 TRAFFIC SUR VEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Su § ar TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 24,616 BEAR ORIGIN Albania, Louisiana BEAR DE$T |NATION Chicago,. Ulinoi RAIL: W1GIWW 111 VARIABLE: 13 ' 04 ^ft FULLY ALLOCATED 16.80 MILES 998 AST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RA1L: 2 ' 43 WATER: 4.24 t"TAT.- 6.67 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 3 ' 65 ua TER : 4.82 TOTAL: 8 . 47 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER —_«*___ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN . LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1542 Barge 5.32 .__ HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .80 TOTAL 6.12 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 211 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Non-Metalic Minerals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 9461 BEAR ORIGIN Brownsville Station, Texas BEAR DEST|NAT|0N South Chicago, Iljl ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : W3GIWW 11.16 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 16.20 RAIL: ±^L FTILLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 3.92 111. R. All RAIL MILES 1475 WATER : 5.79 TOTAL ; 8.50 WATER • 6.67 TOTAL: 10.59 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net Tor CHARGE TO RIVER . HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1927 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER , OTHER Barge 7.09 1.10 TOTAL 8.19 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 212 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Salt TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 58061 BEAR ORIGIN Jefferson Island, Louisiana BEAR DESTINATION Chicago. Til inni g RAIL: W1GIWW VARIABLE: 7 ' 94 FULLY ALLOCATED 11,73 L RAIL: W1GIWW m R VARIABLE : 7 ' 94 RA ^ MILES 1008 AST COST ALTERNATIVE: 2,76 t7at™ 2 - 98 5.74 VARIABLE RAIL: WATER: TOTAL 3.98 FULLY ALLOCATED __MIU__±I: w atp P .: 3 ' 39 T0TAL: 7 ' 37 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ; LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1395 Barge 4.65 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER ' -32 TOTAL 4 ' 97 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 213 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Salt TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 7914 BEAR ORIGIN Jefferson Island, Louisiana BEAR DESTINATION Dubuque,, Iowa ALL RAIL: W1GIWW U.U. Miss- VARIABLE: 1.57 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 12.65 ALL RAIL MILES 1105 RAIL: 3.39 WATER : 2.98 T n TAL • 6.37 RAIL: 5.21 WATER : 3.39 TOTAL : 8.60 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER __ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1434 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net T ■ 4.8i : ' .34 5.15 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 214 COMMODITY Salt TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 128L72 BEAR ORIGIN Bel le Isle, Louisiana W2GIWW f, RAIL: 11.12 VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED VST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 16.17 RAIL: 5.52 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: :.28 BEAR DESTINATION Savage. Minnesota U.U. Miss. ALL _ RAIL MILES 1402 WATER : 2.86 TOTAL 8.38 MATER : 3 - 25 TOTAL: 11.53 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER __ ___ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1660 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 5.68 62 6.30 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 215 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Salt BEAR ORIGIN Cote Blanche, Louisiana W2GIWW 8.63 ALL RAIL: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 12.83 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 14973 BEAR DESTINATION Prairie Du Chien. u U.U. Miss ALL RAIL MILES 1127 RAIL: 3.69 WATER: 2.91 T^TAL • 6.60 RAIL: 5.60 ..... WATER : 3.31 TOTAL : 8.91 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1459 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net T AJ .43 5.32 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 216 COMMODITY Salt TRAIT I C SURVCY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1412 BEAR ORIGIN Weeks Island, Louisiana BEAR DESTINATION Minneapolis, Minnesot . W2GIWW 11.08 L RAIL: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED ^ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 16.23 U.U. Misf ALL RAIL MILES ^ 28 RAIL: 5.52 WATER: 2.93 IOTA] 8.45 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 8.28 WATECJ 3.33 TOTAL: 11>61 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 168 5 Barge TOTAL 5.79 .56 6.35 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 217 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Salt BEAR OR I GUI Je ff erson Island, Louisiana W1GIWW COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 10772 ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 6.78 8.03 BEAR DESTINATION Davenport, Iowa u. u. Miss. All RAIL MILES 827 RAIL: 2.88 WATER : 2.98 TOTAL- 5.86 RAIL: 4.35 , . WATER : 3.39 TOTAL : 7.74 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1348 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ti 4.43 ; .43 4.86 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 218 COMMODITY Salt TRAFFIC SUIW 1 Y COST ANALYSIS , TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) DEAR OR I G 1 1 ! Bel le Isle, Louisiana W2GIWW — RAI IN- VARIABLE: HILLY ALLOCATED ;i COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 8.10 11. RAIL 2.76 FULLY ALLOCATEiL RAIL 3.98 181719 BEAR DESTINATION Calumet Harbor. m inoi- 111. R. ALL RA I L MILES 101 8 WATER : J-JAIER 2.86 3.25 TOTAL 5.62 TOTAL: 7.2 3 RIVER ROUTE (Bar g e, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER handling at river origin like-haul charge handling at river destination charge ex river Cher 1365 Barqc TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 4.51 .38 4.89 REMARKS : EXPLANATION .OF REFERENCE NARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 219 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COf-ir.ODITY Salt TONNAGE (SHORT TOWS) 65,^61 BEAR ORIGIN Cote Blanche, Louisiana BEAR DESTINATION -Pol ton, Illinoi s ■ W2GIWW 111. r. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 7 _L?Z RAM ALL MILES 1028 FULLY ALLOCATED 11.82 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VAR I ABL E RAIL: 2 '21 UATER: 2 .91 T nr>: . 5.67 FULLY ALLOCATED BAIL: 3.98 ,_^ 3. 31 TOTAL: 7 . 29 RIVER ROUTE (Ba r ge, Barce-Rail or True!;) H i les Mode Cost- per Not To: CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 668 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER O'fHER REMARKS : TOTAL 2.98 .40 3.38 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 10 Cost Sheet 220 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Inedible Molasses BEAR OKI GIN New Orleans, Louisi L. Miss HAIL: VARIABLE: 11.53 FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE: " VARIABLE 14.68 RAIL: 2 - 43 FULLY. ALLOCATED. RATE 3.65 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3815 BEAR DESTINATION Cicero, Illinois 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 930 V.'ATER: 3.1 6 , rnTA7 . 5. 59 LM-rr p: 3 - 58 T0TAL: 7. 23 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barce-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLI u'G AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1393 Barge TOTAL Cost p^r i'ct To n 4.23 .63 4.86 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 221 traffic Survey COMMODITY LilT1e COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE BEAR DES (SHORT T 1 NAT 1 • TONS) H027 BEAR ORIGIN ste - Genevieve , 'Missouri ON Calumet: Harbor, Illi L- U. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Miss . 5.28 111. R. All RAIL 6.83 MILES 349 FULLY ALLOCATE;) LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VAKTART.F RAIL: 5.28 HATER : TOtm • 5.28 FITT.T.Y ALLOCATED . .. RAIL: 6.83 1-JAT.Kil: TOTAL: 6>83 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barae-Rail or Truc k) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS • 424 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Net T 2 .01 .25 2 26 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 222 TKAH If SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Liroe TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) _ 453967 B^R ORIGIN Ste. Genevieve, Missouri BEAR D E S T I MAT I ON .Calumet H arbor, Illinoi L. U. Miss. RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED 5.28 6.83 111. R. ALL RAIL MILTS 349 ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 5.2 8 UATER : ° T n T / v 7 • 5 .28 FULLY ALLOCATED KAIL: 6 -83 K Y. T I ™ ; ° TOTAL: 6>8 3 RIVER ROUTE (Barco, Barqe-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Mot Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 424 . Barge 2 .01 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER ' * .25 TOTAL 2.26 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 10 Cost Sheet 223 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Benzol and Benzene BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : Hartford, Illinois L. U. Miss. '' 3.83 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE; VARIABLE 4.99 RAIL: 3.83 FULLY ALLOCATED ra: 4.99 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5829 BEAR DESTINATION Dolton, Illinoi. 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 265 wati: TOTAL 3.83 -UAZE£- TOTAL: 4.99 RIVER ROUTE (B- ar ge, Baron-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode . CHARGE TO RIVER msmmaa HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 337 Barge TOTAL Cost per V et T 1.66 ' .20 1.86 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 224 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST AI J AI Y C .[S COMMODITY Benzol and Benzene TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1819 BEAR ORIGIN Cicero , Illinois BEAR DESTINATION Bea um ont, Texas HI- R. W2GIWW KAIL: 14.00 ALL BARIA11LE: RAIL 17.83 MILES 1091 FULLY ALLOCATED " ,ST COST ALTERNATIVE: , n , 4.01 ? RA c cc RAIL: ,t, t1 „. l ' 5k 6 -55 VARIABLE K/Ui - 17 AT FULLY. ALLOCATED- BATE: 5>2 j j™. n : 2 ' 92 TOTAL: 8.15 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mile s Mode Cose por i'et To n CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1497 . Barg e 3,97 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER ' .58 TOTAL 4.55 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 225 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST COMMODITY Benzol and Benzene ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) l9 BEAR DESTINATION Romeovil] 854 BEAR ORIGIN Houston Ship Channel e, Illinois W2GIWW ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : 14.47 111. R. ALL RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED 18.44 MILES 1189 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARTAW.F. RAIL: 4.01 4.10 WATER: tdt/.t • 8.11 HILLY A77.nr.vrFP RAIL: 5.23 , Hrnr . 4.74 TOTAL: 1IAXE ii :....- 9.97 v RIVER ROUTE (Barcc , Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi 1 e s Mode CHARGE TO RIVER _»!„^ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1601 Barae HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 5.60 .85 6.45 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 226 COMMODITY BEAR ORIGI RAIL: VARIABLE: TRAIT I C SURVEY COST A NALYSIS Benzol and Benzene TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2445 Hartford, Illinois L. U. Miss BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minnesota U. U. Miss. 1.39 fully allocated $t cost alternative; Variable 11.04 ALL RAIL MILES 597 RAIL: 39 l.'ATE ■Tf)T ,'li. 39 FULLY ALLOCATED. RATE: 11.04 -HAXJ^ TOTAL: llm0A RIVE R ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN '__ . LINE-HAUL CHARGE . 647 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Barqe Cost per Net Ton 2.89 .39 TOTAL 3.28 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 227 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST AIJA LYSIS COMMODITY Wood Pulp BEAR ORIGIN Baton Rouge, Louisiana L. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 9.71 12.71 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 31201 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, . Illi nois 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 903 RAIL: 2.76 WATER.: 2.57 T/vrAL: 5.33 RAIL: 3.98 UATKIL : 2.93 TOTAL: 6.91 RIVER ROUTE ( Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ~«.— ^_, _ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1258 Barqc Cost per Net I REMARKS TOTAL EXPLANATION "OF REFERENCE MARKS 3.94 .81 4.75 10 Cost Sheet 228 TRAFFIC SURVE Y COST ANALYSIS COLNOPITY Standard Newsprint Pap er TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 7196 P R OR I G 1 1 J Hiwassee River, Tennessee BEAK DESTINATION Minneapol is, Minn U. U. Miss. Tenn . R |AIL: VARIABLE: 17 14 MILES 100 3 FULLY ALLOCATED 4 13.69 ALL RA I L ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RA1L: WATER: ' iDXHLa FULLY AT.T.nrATFn RAIL: 7 ' 93 K ,, vr rp : 2.69 TOTAL: 10 .62 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ^_ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1383 Bargs 5.10 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER * - 72 TOTAL 5.82 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 10 Cost Sheet 229 TRAFFIC S URVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Tallow - Animal Fats - Oil s TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 25371 BEAR ORIGIN Dubuque, Iowa , BEAR DESTINATION -Avondale, Louisi ana, U. U. Miss. ~ L. Miss. ALL RAIL 7.44 11.05 ALL VARIABLE: RAIL _MILES 1030 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: - VARIABLE gAJjj ^ WATER: 1>62 T nT. M . • 4 ' 96 FULLY ALLOCATED HAIL: 5 ^ HAXi^i 1.83 TOTAL: 6.99 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barg e -Rail or. Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER — n ^^^- Mljrjmj , HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN __ __ LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1425 Barg e HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS TOTAL Cost per 1 let Tr 2.42 1 I .37 2.79 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 230 TRAIT I C SURVEY COr/f ANALYSIS COMMODITY Tallow - Animal Fats - oils TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 24231 BEAR ORIGIN Chicago, Illinois' BEAR DESTINATION Avondale, Louisiana 111. R. RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATE!) L. Miss. 6.80 ALL RA I L 10.10 MILES 930 ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE ]lA1] - : 2 ' 76 WATER; L62 T rrr ., ; . 4. 38 FULLY AT.T.nrATT.-n RAIL : 3>98 1JATn ,: 1.83 TOTAL: 5 . 81 RIVER R OUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1391 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER . OTHER TOTAL Cost nor Met Ton 2.94 .41 3.35 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 231 TRAFFIC SURVE Y COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Com TONNAGE (SHORT TONS ) 139 9 BEAR OR I Gil! St. Paul, Minn. BEAR DESTINATION St. Louis, Mo U. U. Miss. L. U. Miss. ALL RAIL VARI A liLE : 5jJL7 RA | L MILES 575 PJLLY ALLOCATED 7 - 93 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE M £ii 5 ' 57 WATER: ° T fvrA 7 ,. 5 ' 5 7 FULLY ALLOCATE,) MIL, L^i_ i.v.hm T .: ° T0TA ^ 7 ' 93 RIVER ROUTE (B arge, Barge-Rail or Truck ) Miles Mode Cost per Net T r CHARGE TO RIVER ««««««, HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 668 Barge 1.60 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ' CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER s -J]_ TOTAL 1.87 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 232 TR/UT1C SURVEY COST AI.'Al YSI5 COMMODITY Corn TONNAGE (SHORT T0«5) x BEAR ORIGIN U. U. Miss. DEAR DESTINATION L. Ohio RAIL: VARIALL);: 6.68 Al.l, RAI L 9.53 MILES 738 FULLY ALLOCATED 1 COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE MIL: 6.68 WATER: ° ■£C)T' ; • 6.68 Flil.i.Y Ai.i.or.ATrn RAIL: 9.53 WATER 1 ° TOT/.],: 9>53 RIVER ROUTE (Ba rg e, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LIME-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 967 iarqe TOTAL Cost per i let Ton ?. .38 .38 2. ,76 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 233 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Corn BEAR ORIGI ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE _ U. U. Miss, RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION M. Miss. 9.13- ALL RAIL MILES H2 3 13.13 5.57 WATER X - 49 T OT V.T- 7 *L 7.93 lUiTVM 1.63 TOTAL: 9.56 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1361 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net T< ; 2.40 .41 2.81 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 234 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Corn COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE BEAR DE< (SHORT TONS) iTINATION Ark - River BEAR ORIGIN u * u - Miss . L RAIL: VARIABLE: 7.70 ALL RAI L FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 10.97 MILES 863 ^ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 2.37 WATER : 3.76 t otat • 6. 13 FULLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: 3.69 - ■ WATER : 4.23 TOTAL: 7.92 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER . HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ; LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1035 Barge TOTAL REMARKS Cost per Net Ton 3 . SD .55 4.05 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 235 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn BEAR ORIGIM U. U. Miss, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 10.89 15.89 RAIL: 5.57 FULLY ALLOCATED- RAIL : 7.93 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) X BEAR DESTINATION WlGIWW ; ALL RAIL MILES 1329 WATER: 2-94 T nT/y T ,- 8.48 WATER : 3.31 TOTAL: 11>2 4 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1814 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton ' 3.74 .64 1 4.38 s EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 236 COMMODITY Com BEAR ORIGI RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE U. U. Miss. RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED - RAIL: TR AfTlC SU RVEY COST ANALYSIS 6.18 8.93 1.97 3.03 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) ] BEAR DESTINATION E2GIWW ALL RAIL MILES 799 WATER : 2.42 TOTA] 4.39 WATER : 2.73 TOTAL 5.76 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1252 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 2, 16 33 2.49 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 237 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn BEAR ORIGIN u - u - M iss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 12.67 18.41 RAIL 5.57 FULLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: 7 ' 93 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION Open_ Water ALL RAIL MILES 1700 WATER: 2 ' 59 T^AL- 8 - 16 WATER : 2.85 TOTAL: 1Q>78 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER __„_, HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 2248 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net To 5.43 .91 6.34 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 238 COMMODITY c °m BEAR ORIGIN 111. River ,L RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED AST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED TR AfFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 4.71 6.68 RAIL: 4.71 RAIL: 6.68 BEAR DESTINATION Missouri River ALL RAIL MILES 451 WATER : TOTAL 4.71 WATER TOTAL 6 . 6 8 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER _ __^_ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 75 9 Barge 5.23 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER -74 TOTAL 5.97 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 239 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Corn BEAR ORIGIN, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 111. River RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: COST ANALYSIS 1.97 2.82 1.97 2.82 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) x BEAR DESTINATION ■ L - U._ Miss ALL RAIL MILES 162 WATER : -HATER • TOTAL 1,9 7 TOTAL : 2.28 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net ' : CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 203 Barge TOTAL ,87 .11 ,98 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 240 TRAIT I ( SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONS) COMMODITY Corn TONNAGE (SHORT BEAR DESTIKATH X BEAR ORIGIN 111. River DM L. Ohio li RAIL: VARIABLE: 3.78 AD, RAIL MILES 5.48 442 FULLY ALLOCATED tot*; • M COST ALTERNATIVE: VARTART.F. RAH.: 3.78 WATER : 3.78 FULLY ALT.nrATFn RAIL: 5.48 WATER : ° TOTAL: 5.48 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode ■ Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 525 Barg e' HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL 1.73 .26 1.99 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 241 TRATFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Corn TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) x BEAR OR I Gil! HI- River BEAR DESTINATION Ark. River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 5 - 84 RAIL MILES 701 FULLY ALLOCATED 8.01 ■1 RAIL: 5.84 WATER : T ftT AL • 5 8'i RAIL: 8.01 , WATER : TOTAL: 8.01 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Baroe-Rail or Truck ) Mi les Mode Cost per Met To; CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LIME-HAUL CHARGE 1218 Barge .4.12 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER -61 TOTAL 4 - 7 3 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 242 TflArn i SURVHY COST AI1AI YS I ^ COMMODITY c °m TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN 111. Ri ver ■ BEAR DESTINATION WlGIWW »IL: VARIABLE: 8.17 KLLY ALLOCATED 11.83 ALL RAIL LES 1091 I COST ALTERNATIVE: • VARIABLE RAU: 2 - 76 2.91 5.67 WA'i .TQTer Net Tc 2.09 1 .29 2.38 REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NARKS 10 Cost Sheet 246 COfuMOD ITY_ Soybeans BEAR ORIGIN u - u - Miss. RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED T Cn.ST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5.57 7.93 RAIL: 5.57 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 7 - 93 BEAR DESTINATION L. U. Mi; ALL RAIL MILES 57S WATER; Q iQX ALi 5 ' 57 WATER TOTAL: i.S3_. RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER " • HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN '_ LINE-HAUL CHARGE 668 . Barge 1.60 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL .27 1.87 REMARKS : . EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 247 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Soybeans TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) X BEAR ORIGIN u - u - Miss. BEAR DESTINATION Term. River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 7 24 ALL /,Z4 RAIL MILES 725 FULLY ALLOCATED 9.01 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARTART.F RAIL: 7 ' 24 WATER: ° TOTAj • 7.24 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 9 ' 01 WATER: TOTAL : g # 01 RIVER ROUTE (Barqe, Barqe-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Met To CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 888 Barge 3.09 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .40 TOTAL 3.49 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 248 COMMODITY Soybeans BEAR ORIGIN U " u - Miss L RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED VST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION 9.40 13.40 RAIL: 5.57 FITLLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: 7.93 ALL RAIL MILES 1123 WATER: 1-49 WATER : 1 t73 TOTAL 7.06 TOTAL: 9.66 RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER • HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN '' LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1361 '■ Barge 2.40 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ■ CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL 41 2.81 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 249 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY So Ybeans U. U. Miss BEAR ORIGIN. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE BEAR DESTINATION .18 8,93 RAIL: 1.97 WATER : FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 3.03 WATER : IT- TONS) X noN E2GIWW ALL RAIL MILES 799 2.42 T n TAT • .4.39 2.73 TOTAL : RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1252 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net 2.16 ; .33 ! 2.49 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 250 TRAFFIC SURVEY (SHORT .TINATI TONS) ON COMMODITY Soybeans COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE BEAR DES x BEAR ORIGIN in - River L. U. Miss. ,L RAIL: VARIABLE: 1.97 ALL RAIL MILES FULLY ALLOCATED 2.82 162 AST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAiL: 1.97 WATER : TOT AT • 1 . 9 7 FHT.T.Y AT.T.nr.ATFn RAIL: 2.82 - WATER : TOTAL: , „ RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 203 Barge TOTAL Cost per Met Ton 87 11 .98 . EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 251 COMMODITY Soybeans BEAR ORIGIN, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FITLLY ALLOCATED 111. River TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION Tenn. River 5.16 7.49 ALL RAIL MILES 6 54 RAIL: 5.16 WATER: TOTAI • 5.16 RAIL: 3.92 WATER : 2.76 TOTAL : 6.68 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net Tor CHARGE TO RIVER — _ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 743 Barge REMARKS : I Cairo TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 2.98 .37 3.35 Cost Sheet 252 COMMODITY Soybeans BEAR ORIGIN Peoria, 111 RAI IN- VARIABLE: 111. River FULLY ALLOCATED VST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FIJLLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS! 5.84 8.01 5.84 8.01 1371 BEAR DESTINATION Tulsa, Okla Ark. River ALL RAIL MILES 701 WATER; TOTAL 5.84 WATER TOTAL: 8.01 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1218 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 4.12 .61 4.73 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 253 COMMODITY Soybeans BEAR ORIGIN 111. River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS .79 12.76 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION W2GIWW ALL RAIL MILES 1175 RAIL: 2.76 WATER: 2.94 T n TAI • 5.70 RAIL: 3.98 -.WATER:- . 3.31 TOTAL: 7.29 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met Toi CHARGE TO RIVER . ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1637 Barge REMARKS : TOTAL 4.60 .69 5.29 . EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 254 COMMODITY Soybeans TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN L. u. Miss. BEAR DESTINATION U. u. Miss. , RAIL: VARIABLE: 5 57 ALL RA 1 L FULLY ALLOCATED 7 33 MILES 575 ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 5,57 WATER: ° t otat - 5.57 Fin.T.Y AT.T.nnATFn RAIL: 7 ' 93 WFP : TOTAL: 7.9 3 RIVER ROUTE CHARGE TO RIVER (Barqe, Barqe-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net Ton HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 668 Barge 1-78 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .26 TOTAL 2.04 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 255 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY BEAR ORIGIN, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Soybeans St. Louis. Mo. L. U. Miss FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5.60 8.12 24,322 BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, La. L. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 721 RAIL: 5.60 WATER : TOTAL- 5.60 RAIL: 8.12 ....... WATER : . TOTAL : 8.12 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1030 Barge TOTAL Cost pe r Net To ■ 1 .35 . .19 1 54 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 256 COfiMOD I TY Soybeans BEAR ORIGIN L. Miss RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED i COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RA1L: FIFLLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: TRAFflC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS 10.69 15.26 5.57 7.93 BEAR DESTINATION u - u _- Mis; ALL RAIL MILES 1,314 WATER; MZ T YVTAT- 8 ' 64 WATER : , 3. 48 TOTAL: 11>41 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) M? les Mode Cost pe r Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER • ■ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ' ■• • ■ . LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1698 • ' Barge 5.45 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL .81 6.26 REMARKS: . EXPLANATION -OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost. Sheet 257 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Barley & Rye ■ TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 29C3 BEAR ORIGIN st - Paul ; Minn - BEAR DESTINATION st-.. t^q, ^ U. U. Miss, ALL RAIL: 5.57 7.93 L. U. Miss. ALL VARIABLE : Z— — RA I L MILES FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 5.57 WATER : TOT AT • 5.57 RAIL: 7.93 I-JATERi. TOTAL : 7.93 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Baroe-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net T CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE • 668 Barge 1.78 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION " CHARGE EX RIVER - , OTHER ; -J6_ TOTAL 2 - 04 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS Cost Sheet 258' TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMITY Barley & Rye - lOmmt (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN u - u - Miss. BEAR DEST I NAT I ON Open .Water 12.67 ALL -i=-l^-l RAIL 18.41 - MILES 1700 , RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED iST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 5 ' 57 WATER: 2 ' 59 T rvr A ; ■ 8 - 16 FULLY AT.T.nPATFn RAIL: 7 ' 93 ijatf F : 2 ' 85 TOTAL: 10.78 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) . Miles Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 2248 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER 5-43 OTHER REMARKS : 91 TOTAL 6.34 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 259 TRAFFIC SURVEY i \. COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY 0ats \ TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN x11 - River BEAR DESTINATION L. U. Miss. ALL RAIL: 1.97 ALL VARIABLE: = RAIL ~ FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: 2.82 MILES 162 VARIABLE RAIL: 1,9? WATER: ° T OTM . •" 1 ' 97 . FIILLY ALLOCATED- MIL: ^ ^^ TOTAL: 2.8 2_ RIVER ROUTE (Barae, Baroe-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER . HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN "_ LINE-HAUL CHARGE 203 - Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : TOTAL Cost per Net To . .87 .11 .98 ! EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 260 COMMODITY 0ats BEAR ORIGIN 111. River RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FIJLLY ALLOCATED RAIL: RAIL: TRAmC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5.16 7.49 5.16 3.92 BEAR DESTINATION Tenn. River ALL RAIL MILES 654 WATER : TOT,',!. 5.16 JATET. 2. 76 TOTAL : S^S- RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER BUNDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 743 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 2.98 .37 3.35 Cairo - EXPLANATION OF REFERENC1 MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 261 COMMODITY Oats BEAR ORIGIN HI- River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTF.RNATIV VARIABLE TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR. DESTINATION M - Miss. 5.25 ALL RAIL 7.61 MILES 667 1.™ T nTAT • 3 * 41 VE: RAIL: 1.91 WATER : RAIL: 2.74 WATER : 1.60 T0TAL: A v. RIVER ROU" FE (Barqe, Barae-Rai 1 o r Truck) CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 725 Barge TOTAL 1.36 .15 1.51 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 262 COMMODITY Oats BEAR ORIGIN 111. River RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED IT COST ALTERNATIVE: "VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 6.36 9.23 RAIL: 1-67 2.39 BEAR DESTINATION L. Miss.. ALL RAIL MILES 8 38 WATER: 1>99 WATER 1 TOTAL 3.66 2.20 TOTAL: 4.59 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Baree-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1127 Barge TOTAL 1.86 25 2.11 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 263 COMMODITY 0ats BEAR ORIGIN 111. River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS 8.79 12.72 RAIL: . 2 - 76 3.98 BEAR DESTINATION W2GIWW ALL RAIL MILES 1175 WATER : 2 .94 TnTftT . 5.70 WATER : 3 . 31 TOTAL: ^ 29 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net 1 CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1637 Barge TOTAL 4.60 .69 I 5.29 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS ' 6 10 Cost Sheet 264 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY 2!!! i TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN 111. River BEAR DESTINATION Open Water RAIL: VARIABLE: 9.37 FULLY ALLOCATED 13.63 ALL RAIL MILES 1302 T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 2 - 76 WATER: 5.81 T n-r AT . 8.57 FIJLLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 3.98 ijatfr- 6 - 66 TOTAL: iq.6$ RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1951 • Barge 5.58 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .86 TOTAL 6 - 44 REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 265 COMMODITY Oats BEAR ORIGIN L- U. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED - RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 5.70 8.26 5.70 .26 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION L. Mis.s ALL RAIL MILES WATER : 736 -XOTJ 5.70 !'. T ATEP. : TOTAL: 8.26 1030 Barge RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Baroe-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net T CHARGE TO RIVER ___ ■ ' ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : TOTAL .1.54 .21 1.75 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 266 COMMODITY Wheat BEAR ORIGIN u. U. Miss. RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 6.68 9.53 6.61 FULLY AT.T.nrATrn RAIL: 9.53 BEAR DESTINATION L. Ohio ALL RAIL MILES 738 WATER: WATER' tot;,;. 6.68 TOTAL : 9 53 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Baroe-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 967 Barge TOTAL Cost per Met Ton 2.38 .38 2.76 EXPLANATION! OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 267 COMMODITY Wheat BEAR ORIGIN u - U. Miss ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED. TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS ' TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 6.11 i. 83 ..11 RAIL: . 8.83 BEAR DESTINATION Tenn. River ALL RAIL MILES 725 WATER: TOTAL 6.11 WATER : CL TOTAL : -8r*3- RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER •1019 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net 1 3.22 .42 3.64 i REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 268 COMMODITY Wheat TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) X B^R ORIGIN. U. u - Miss. BEAR DESTINATION M. Ohio RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 7.35 10.53 ALL RAIL MILES 8 49 RAIL: 7.35 WATER : TPTA 7.35 RAIL: ■ 10 ' 53 WATER : . TOTAL: jq.^ RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION :HARGE EX RIVER 3THER REMARKS: 1223 Barge TOTAL 2.24 .32 2.56 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 269 COhMODITY Wheat BEAR ORIGIN U. U. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 9.13 13.13 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION M. Miss.. ALL RAIL MILES 1123 RAIL: 5.57 WATER: 1.50 TDTA7 • 7.07 v RAIL: 7.93 WATER 1 1.60 TOTAL: 9.53 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1199 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net To 2 .68 i .40 ; 3. 08 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 10 Cost Sheet 270 COMMODITY Wheat BEAR ORIGIN U. U. Miss RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 11.03 16.09 5.57 FlfLLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 7.93 BEAR DESTINATION W2GJWW ALL RAIL MILES 134i WA TER: 2 ' 94 rnr.r . «-51 WATER : 3.31 TOTAL: 11.24 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) ■ Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : .1934 Barge TOTAL 4.66 .74 5.40 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. Cost Sheet 271 COMMODITY Wheat BEAR ORIGIN. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE U. U. Miss. TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION W3GIWW- FULLY. ALLOCATED 13.71 ALL RAIL 20.02 MILES 1720 4.27 totat •- 9.84 VE: RAIL: 5.57 WATER : RAIL: 7.93 WATER : 4.87 TOTAL: 12.80 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER . ; ; HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 2103 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Top 5.44 .88 6.32 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 272 COMMODITY Wheat BEAR ORIGIN U. U. Miss. RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED T CflST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS 6.68 9.53 6.1 9.53 BEAR DESTINATION Open Water ALL RAIL MILES 17 °0 WATER : TOTA ,. 6.68 IMTER 1 TOTAL: 9.53 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) • Miles Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER • - HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 2248 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ' OTHER TOTAL 5 .43 .91 6. 34 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 273 COMMODITY. Wheat BEAR ORIGIN HI. River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FIFLLY ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 1.97 2.82 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION L. U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 162 RAIL: 1.97 WATER: TOT,\7 • 1.97 i RAIL: 2.82 WATER : TOTAL: 2.82 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net 1 r CHARGE TO RIVER. • ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ; LINE-HAUL CHARGE . 2 °3 ■ ' Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ■ CHARGE EX RIVER ; \ OTHER TOTAL .87 ,11 .98 REMARKS : . EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 10 . Cost Sheet 274 COMMODITY Wheat TRAFF IC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) x BEAR ORIGIN 111. River BEAR. DESTINATION Tenn. River : RAIL: VARIABLE: 5.16 ALL RAI L FULLY ALLOCATED 7.49 MILES 654 ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARTART.F. RAIL: 5.16 WATER • T nT.«.j . 5 ' 16 Fin.T.Y AT.T.nrATrn RAIL: 3.98 m™ ? : 9 .«« TOTAL: 6.84 RIVER ROUTE (Barge , Barqe-Rail or Truck) CHARGE TO RIVER Miles Mode Cost per Net Ton HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 743 Barge 2.98 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .37 TOTAL 3 . 35 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 Cost Sheet 275 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Wheat BEAR ORIGIN Kansas citv. Mo. Missouri River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: ' FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 4.71 6. 4.71 FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL: 6.6! 1334 BEAR DESTINATION Chicaqn., tti 111 . River ALL RAIL MILES 451 WATER : TOTAL 4.71 WATER : TOTAL : 6.68 720 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' __ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Barge TOTAL Cost per Net T ! 3.57 ! .65 4.22 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS Cost Sheet 276 COfcMOD I TY Wheat BEAR ORIGIN Omaha, Nebraska Missouri River RAI IN- VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION 4.95 7.02 4.95 RAIL 7.02 1133 WATER; WATER St. Louis, Mo L. U. Miss ALL RAIL MILES 484 TOTAL 4.95 TOTAL: 7 . 02 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ' . LINE-HAUL CHARGE . • 6.22. Barge 3.12 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION " CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL .75 3.87 REMARKS - EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 277 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Wheat TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN L..U. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 1.97 BEAR DESTINATION 111. Ri^er ALL RAIL 2.82 MILES 162 RAIL: 1.97 WATER : 1.97 TOTAL : FULLY. ALLOCATED. MIL: 2.82 WATER : TOTAL: 2.82 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 203 Barge REMARKS TOTAL Cost per Net J .87 .11 .98 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 278 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Wheat COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) * BEAR ORIGIN L. u. Miss. BEAR DESTINATION Term. River RAIL: VARIABLE: 4.36 ALL RA 1 L FULLY ALLOCATED 6.31 MILES 530 JT COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 4.36 WATFR: totat • 4.36 Fin.T.Y AT.T.nnATFn RAIL: 6.31 t.ta TFP : TOTAL: 6.31 RIVER ROUTE (Barqe , Barqe-Rail or Truck) CHARGE TO RIVER Miles Mode Cost per Net Ton HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 581 Barge 2.41 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .23 TOTAL 2.64 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 279 COMMODITY Wheat BEAR ORIGIN L. U. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED RAILj_ TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 5.60 8.12 RAIL: 5.60 .12 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION L. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 721 WATER: TOTAL 5.60 WATER : TOTAL: 8.12 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met T i CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 10 30 Barge TOTAL 1.54 .21 1.75 . EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7^ 10 Cost "Sheet 280 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Wheat ■ TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN. L. u - Miss. BEAR DESTINATION W2GIWW L RAIL: VARIABLE: 7 j^ ■ R J^L FULLY ALLOCATED 10.34 MILES 798 ^ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL^ _ _ 7^12 WATER: ttvtmt . 719 . FULLY at.t .nr ATrn RAIL: 10,34 LZAIEJiI__2 TOTAL; 10.34 RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) - Miles Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER '. • ' ■ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ; ' LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1146 Barge 2.64 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ' CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER . 38 TOTAL 3 - 02 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 281 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Wheat BEAR ORIGIN M. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED COST ANALYSIS 4.39 48 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS BEAR DESTINATION L- u. Mis.s ALL RAIL MILES 548 RAIL: 4.39 WATER : T n T,M ■' 4.39 RAIL: 6.48 '• T AT r r ■ TOTAL: 6.48 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Baroe-Rail or Truck) M? les Mode Cost per Net Tc CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 693 Barge TOTAL 2 .04 .27 2 31 . EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 282 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS T TONS) ION COMMODITY Coal TnMf(flrF { ^ 2668 BEAR ORIGIN Lacrosse, wis. RFA R hf<;tinat Rosiclare, 111 U. U. Miss. , RAIL: VARIABLE: 3 - 69 ALL RAIL MILES L. Ohio FULLY ALLOCATED 5.40 577 ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 3 - 69 WATER: TOTAL: 3 ' 69 TOTAL: 5 .40 FULLY AT.T.nrATFn RAIL: 5 .* 40 T-'/\TFP : RIVER ROUTE (Barqe, Barqe-Rail or Tr uck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER Cost per Met Ton HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE • 958 Barge 2.58 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .27 TOTAL 2.85 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 283 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Coal BEAR ORIGIN Charleston, W. Va, Kan. River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 5.29 7.77 TONNAGE' (SHORT TONS) 5667 BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minn. U. U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 912 RAIL: 5.29 WATER : TOT,\t • 5.29 RAIL: 7.77 - WATER : TOTAL: 7.77 TOTAL RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net CHARGE TO RIVER ' ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN '. ' I LINE-HAUL CHARGE . 1645 . Barge 5.45 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER • ; OTHER -80 6.25 REMARKS : . EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 284 CO/iMOD I TY Coal TRArriC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1 3,732 BEAR ORIGIN Charleston, W. Va Kan. River . RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED 3.36 4.90 .ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 3.36 FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL: 4.90 BEAR PEST I NAT I Pis' Chicago, 111. 111. River ALL _ RAIL MILES 507 WATER TOT a: HATER 3.36 TOTAL: 4 -90 RIVER RC'JTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) MMes Mode CHARGE TO RIVER pNDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1331 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 4.04 58 4.62 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 285 COMMODITY Coal BEAR ORIGIN Pittsburgh., Pa. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: U. Ohio FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5525 4.68 6.86 BEAR DESTINATION Alma, Wis. U. U. Miss. ALL : RAIL MILES 784 RAIL: 4.68 WATER: •pnTAT ■ 4.68 RAIL: 6.86 ....... WATER L TOTAL : 6.86 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1707 Barge TOTAL 5.40 80 6.20 EXPLANATION OF REFERENC E H ARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 286 RhMODITY Coal TRArF COST IC SURVEY ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT BEAR DESTINATI TONS) 10 ' 08f > IEAR ORIGIN Van Buren , Ark. ON Chicago,. 111. klL: VARIABLE: Ark. Rive TED NATIVE: r 4.26 111. River ALL RAIL ULLY ALLOW 6.23 MILES 695 ' COST ALTF.R VARIABLE RAIL: 4.26 WATER: T n TAI • 4.26 FULLY ALLOCATFD RAIL: 6 ' 23 WATER : TOTAL: 6>23 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton HARGE TO RIVER AMDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN INE-HAUL CHARGE 1203 Barge 4.53 ANDUNG AT RIVER DESTINATION HARGE EX RIVER THER ' .65 TOTAL 5.18 E MARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 287 COMMODITY Crude Petroleum BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Chicago, 111 111. River FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 79206 BEAR DESTINATION St. Louis, Mo 4.01 6.6! 4.01 6.65 L.U. Miss ALL RAIL 284 MILES WATER: TOTAL : 4.01 WATER : TOTAL: 6.65 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER , HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 329 Barge Cost per Met Toi 1.62 20 TOTAL 1.82 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 288 COMMOO I TY Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN Clinton, la. '" u. u. Miss. " L RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED \S1 COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL : TR AFFIC SURV EY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2594 11.15 14.38 RAIL: 4-38 5.95 BEAR DESTINATION Norco,_ La. L. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 958 WATEBj 1.36 TOTAL ; 5 - 7 V WATER 1.56 TOTAL : 7.51 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net T on CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1342 Barge TOTAL 2.26 .33 2.59 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 289 COMMODITY Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 111. Rive] RAIL: FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 4.59 5.97 4.59 5.97 TONNAGE (SHORT TOMS) X BEAR DESTINATION M. Ohio ALL RAIL MILES 336 WATER .WATER 1 4.59 TOTA] TOTAL: 5.97 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net Tor CHARGE TO RIVER «__ - _ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 798 Barge 3.23 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER -37 TOTAL 3.60 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 290 COMMODITY Fuel Oil TRAF FIC S URVEY CO ST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN New Orleans, La. L. M. Miss. RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: 11.22 14.37 VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 4.01 RATE 5.23 6508 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, Til . 111. River JaZAIEJi ALL RAIL MILES 930 WATER: 2.62 T rvr/u, ; fi.fi^ 3.03 TOTAL: 8.26 RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1387 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 4.21 .62 4.83 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 291 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual EusJ nil BEAR ORIGIN Chicago, 111, 111. River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 7.21 9.29 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS; BEAR DESTINATION 13CO Decatur., Ala. Tenn . River ALL RAIL MILES 571 RAIL: 4.01 WATER : 1.95 T<~>T/VL : 5.96 RAIL: 5.23 WATER : 2.16 TOTAL : 7.39 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ' ' _ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN . LINE-HAUL CHARGE 822 Barge 3.30 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ' CHARGE EX RIVER ' - OTHER -41 TOTAL 3.71 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 292 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Residual Fuel 0] COST .1 A1JALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT BEAR DESTINATI TONS ) ON M. Ohio BEAR ORIGIN 111. River , RAIL: VARIABLE: 5.48 ALL RAIL MILES 416 5.48 T0TA1 ' FULLY ALLOCATED 7.10 ,ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 5.48 WATER : FIIT.T.Y AT.T.nrATFn RAIL: 7.10 WATER : ° TOTAL: 7>10 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER •IEMARKS : 1192 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Top 4.7J .63 .41 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 293 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Residual Fuel nil TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN U. U. Miss. BEAR DESTINATION W2GIWW_ ALL RAIL: ALL VARIABLE: 111.. RAIL MILES 1034 FULLY ALLOCATED -U>.4b RAIL: 4.38 WATER : 2.96 TOTAT,- 7.34 RAIL: 5,95 WATER : 3.43 TOTAL : 9.38 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net CHARGE TO RIVER . - -'■■■ ■ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN „ LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1487 Barge 3.86 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER - . OTHER ' .59 TOTAL 4.45 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 294 COhMOD I TY Residual Fuel Oil BEAR ORIGIN Chicago, 111. 111. River RAIL: VARIABLE : TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5.58 FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED 7.23 RAIL: 5.58 -MILL 7.23 1200 BEAR DESTINATION Steubenvill e. Ohio U. Ohio ALL RAIL MILES 425 WATEB J. TOTAL: 5.58 W/lTERj TOTAL: 7.23 RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Ml les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER . HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1254 Barge 5.73 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ' CHARGE EX RIVER ' OTHER TOTAL .78 6.51 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 1 10 Cost Sheet 295 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Asphalt TONNAGE (SHORT TONS! BEAR ORIGIN M. Ohio ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE 10.07 12.91 BEAR DESTINATION U. u. -Miss. ALL , RAIL MILES 827 CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVE LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVE CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : RAIL: 10 ' 07 WATER . THtat. 10-07 RAIL: 12 - 91 w A TEP : ° TOTAL: 12.91 RIVER ROUTE (Barqe, Barqe-Rail or Truck) Cost per Net T Miles Mode R ORIGIN 1504 Barge 5.02 .R DESTINATION ; TOTAL .73 5.75 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 296 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Asphalt TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) x BEAR ORIGIN 0. Ohio BEAR DESTINATION 111. River , RAIL: VARIABLE: 5.65 FULLY ALLOCATED 7.31 ALL RAIL MILES 431 ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAILJ 5^65 WATER: Q T nry . 5.6S FULLY AT.T.nrATFn RAIL: 7 - 31 MAZER: Q TOTAL: 731 RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1492 Barge 4.57 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER • .68 TOTAL 5.25 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 297 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMOD I TY Coke, Petroleum TONNAGE . (S.H0RT TONS ) ' BEAR ORIGIN Tenn . River . BEAR DESTINATION U. U. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 8.18 10.52 RAIL: 2 - 60 FULLY ALLOCATED MILi 3.55 ALL RAIL MILES 658 WATER: 2.03 T° T AL- 4 » 63 V ATFRV-' ? • 25 T0TAL: 5.80 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or truck) .Miles Mode Cost per Net Tc CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 777 Barge TOTAL 3.29 .42 3.71 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 298 COMMODITY Cement BEAR ORIGIN, RAIL: VARIABLE: Clarksville, Mo. U. U. Miss FULLY ALLOCATED ST CHST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: TRAFFIC SUR VEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) _ 28,401 BEAR DESTINATION Memphis , Term. 5.44 6.97 2.40 3.45 W. Miss ALL RAIL MILES 400 WATER : 1.00 WAIEftJ TOTAL 3.40 1.08 TOTAL: 4.53 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 488 Barge 1.12 12 TOTAL 1.24 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 299 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Cement BEAR ORIGIN CI arks vi lie, Mo. " U. U. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED :.83 11.52 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 14,789 BEAR DESTINATION New Orleans, La, L. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 794 RAIL: 2.40 WATER: 1.64 TOTAT • 4.04 RAIL: 3.45 WATER : 1.85 TOTAL : 5.30 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi fes Mode Cost per Met CHARGE TO RIVER __ ___ _ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1129 Barge _ HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION _ CHARGE EX RIVER ; _ OTHER 1.76 .24 TOTAL 2.00 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 300 COMMODITY Cement TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) hh ,<>>}■/ BEAR ORIGIN Clarksvilie, Mo. U. U. Miss. L RAIL: VARIABLE: ______ FULLY ALLOCATED 8.47 11.03 *ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 2.40 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL 3.45 WATER BEAR DESTINATION Mobile, A],i E2GIWW ALL RA I L MILES 752 WATER: 2.32 T m^ T ■ L 79 2.60 TOTAL: fi _ ns RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1229 Barge Cost per Net Ton TOTAL 2.32 33 2.65 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 Cost Sheet 301 COMMODITY Cement BEAR ORIGIN Ottawa, 111. '" 111. River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 3.90 4.92 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 17,838 BEAR DESTINATION St. .Charles, Mo. ALL RAIL MILES Missouri Rive 222 Mo. | r RAIL: 3.90 WATER: T n TAL • 3.90 RAIL: 4.92 WATER : TOTAL : 4.92 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 295 Barge TOTAL 1.91 .20 2.11 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 302 COMMODITY Cement BEAR ORIGIN LaSalle, 111 111. River RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED 3T COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE RAIL FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 4.90 6.16 4.90 5.12 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) _ 14,431 BEAR DESTINATION Paducah, Ky L. Ohio ALL RAIL MILES 305 WATER TOTAL 4.90 WATER 1.01 TOTAL : 6.13 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 462 Barge TOTAL 1.76 .20 1.96 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 Cost Sheet 303 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Cement COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 40.620 BEAR ORIGIN LaSalle, 111. 111. River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: BEAR DESTINATION Cincinnati. Chin { M. Ohio FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIV VARIABLE CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 5.10 ALL RAIL MILES 329 TDTAJ • 5.10 6.43 VE: RAIL: 5;io WATER: RAIL: 6.43 WATER : TOTAL: 6#43 RIVER ROUTE (Barqe Barq e-Rai 1 or Truck) Cost per Net Ton Miles Mode 919 Barge 3.69 .47 TOTAL 4.16 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 304 COMMODITY Cement BEAR ORIGIN RAIL: VARIABLE: Ottawa, 111. Ui. Kiver — FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL TRAFFIC SUR VEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 14.35 18.74 RAIL: 4.22 5.23 2854 BEAR DESTINATION Brownsville, Tex. ■"' W3GTWW ALL RAIL MILES 1396 WATER : 5.09 WATER : TOTAJ . 9.31 5.94 TOTAL: n. 17 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1934 Barge TOTAL 6.02 .94 6.96 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 305 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Cement BEAR QRI GIU Kansas City, Mo. Missouri River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 5. 7.56 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 12,768 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago,. 111. 111. River ALL RAIL MILES 451 RAIL: 5.88 WATER: T nT AL' 5.88 RAIL: 7.56 WATER : TOTAL: 7.56 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RlVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 693 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net To 3.36 ; .62 3.98 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 306 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST COMMODITY Cement ANALYSIS TO MM AGE BEAR DES (SHORT TONS) 4067 BEAR ORIGIN Baton Rouge, La. iTINATION Chicaqo, 111 L. Miss . 1 RAIL: VARIABLE: 10.05 111. River ALL RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED 12.88 MILES 9 °3 AST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 4.72 WATER : 2 - 59 total 7.31 FULLY AT.T.nrATPTi RAIL: 5 - 8 3 WATER : 2.95 TOTAL: 8.78 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1262 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 3.94 .58 4.52 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 307 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Iron and Steel TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 445 BEAR ORIGIN clinton > Ia - BEAR DESTINATION Decateur,. Ala. ALL RAIL: U ' U ' MisS ' ATT Te ™ River 6 • 18 ALL VARIABLE: = RAIL 8.62 HUES 7 ° 3 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST CHST ALTERNATIVE: "VARIABLE RA1L: — WATER; 1^1 TOTAL : 5 ' 41 FULLY ALLOCATED MIL: till WATER' hU- TOTAL: 7^17 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode " Cost per Net CHARGE TO RIVER. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN '_ LIKE-HAUL CHARGE • 868 , ' Barge - HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : TOTAL • 2.94 ' .39 3.33 . EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet '308 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN St - Paul, Minn. RAIL: VARIABLE: U.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED . RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS 7.19 10.04 5.28 7.34 AD± BEAR. DESTINATION Nashville, cnn Cumberland River 846 ALL RAIL MILES WATER; l.i TOTAL : 7 - 1 ? KATER 2.08 TOTAL: 9.42 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1092 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 3.26 .45 3.71 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 309 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Davenport, la. U.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE : VARIABLE RAIL: Fin.LY ALLOCATED. RAIL: COST ANALYSIS 4.83 6.71 2.82 4.26 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 24% BEAR DESTINATION Weirton, W. Va. U. Ohio ALL RAIL MILES 512 WATER: 4.55 TOTAL 7.37 IMTER : 5.14 TOTAL : _2^4JL RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Baroe-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1400 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net T • 5 ,03 .71 5 74 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 310 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN B e"endorf, la RAIL: VARIABLE: U.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) ^34 5.78 1.06 2.82 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL 4.26 BEAR DESTINATION Pittsburg, Pa. Monongahola River ALL RAIL MILES 647 WATER; 4 -85 TOTAL : 7.6 7 WATER : 5.48 TOTAL' 9 . 74 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1471 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 5.42 .75 6.17 . EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 311 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN U. U. Miss ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST CAST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 7.43 10.38 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION M. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 880 VE: RAIL: 5.28 WATER : .99 TOT AT • 6.27 RAIL: 7.34 HATER : 1.07 TOTAL: 8.41 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER . HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1054 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net T 2 .36 ! .35 2 71 REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 Cost Sheet 312 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN, L RAIL: VARIABLE: St. Paul, Minn U.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED ^ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: TRAfFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 7.31 10.21 7.31 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 10.21 1/00 BEAR DESTINATION Tulsa _ okl.i. Ark River ALL RAIL MILES 863 WATER: WATER : TOTAL 7.31 TOTAL: 10 . 2 1 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN t INE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1502 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Tnn 5.92 6.80 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 313 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN St ■ Paul » Minn - .,, „._, U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FlfLLY ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 10.28 14.42 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 610 BEAR DESTINATION Harvey_ La. W1GIWW ALL RAIL MILES 1284 RAIL: 5.28 WATER : 1.98 TnT/\T • 7.26 RAIL: 7.34 WATER : 2.25 TOTAL: 9.59 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met To CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1649 Barge TOTAL 3.36 .52 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 314 COMMODITY Iron and Steel TRAFF COST If Ai SURVEY VALYS IS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 819 BEAR DESTINATION Houston, * BEAR ORIGIN St. Paul, Minn. Texas RAIL: VARIABLE : U.U. Miss. 8.18 W2CIWW ALL RA 1 L FULLY ALLOCATED 11.52 MILES 994 T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 2.82 WATER: 3.52 TnTA , , ■ 6.14 Fin.T.Y AT.T.nrATFn RAIL: 4.26 t.™: 4.03 TOTAL: S.9Q RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) . Mi les Mode Cost per Met Ten CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIM LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1979 Barge TOTAL .78 5.66 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 315 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN Chicago, 111 ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 111 River FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FIFLLY ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 4.40 6.10 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 891 BEAR DESTINATION Kansas- City , Mo ALL RAIL MILES Missouri River 451 RAIL: 4.40 WATER: TOT.^t •■ h 40 RAIL: 6.10 WATER : TOTAL: 6.10 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ______ ' ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 689 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net To 5.25 ! l .77 ! 6.02 REMARKS . EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 316 COMMODITY Iron and Stee l BEAR ORIGIN chica S°» HI. RAIL: VARIABLE: 111 River FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FIILLY ALLOCATED RAIL: RAIL TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 7*3 3.44 4.66 3.44 4.66 BEAR DESTINATION Evansville, I nd . L. Ohio ALL RAIL MILES 289 WATER: TOTAL . 3.44 K.1TER : TOTAL : 4.66 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 707 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 2.84 .34 3.18 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 317 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Chicago, 111 111 River FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL COST ANALYSIS ■5.18 7.13 2.77 3.95 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 595 BEAR DESTINATION Nashville, Tenn Cumberland River ALL RAIL MILES 536 WATER : 1.90 WATER : 2.09 TDTAi 4.6 7 TOTAL : 6.06 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 766 Barge TOTAL Cost per Met fr 3.07 .38 3.45 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 Cost Sheet 318 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN Chicago, 111 L RAIL: VARIABLE : 111 River FULLY ALLOCATED *ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL TRAFFIC SURVCY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE' (SHORT TONS) 654 3.31 4.55 RAIL: 3.31 4.55 BEAR DESTINATION Louisville, Ky M. Ohio ALL RAIL MILES 296 WATER; KATER . TOTAL : 3. 31 TOTAL: 4, 55 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 3.50 .46 3.96 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet '319 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST AHA LYSIS COMMODITY Iron and Steel TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5866 BEAR ORIGIN Chicago, 111 BEAR DESTINATION Aliquippa, Pa. Ill River U. Ohio « ALL RAIL: ALL VARIABLE: IllH — RAIL 4.70 FULLY ALLOCATED .6.45 MILES 468 RAIL: 4.70 WATER : TOT AT • 4.70 RAIL: • 6.45 WATER : TOTAL : 6.45 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net To CHARGE TO RIVER __^_^ ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ' LINE-HAUL CHARGE "1508 Barge 6.04 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : .83 TOTAL 6.87 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 320 CONMOD I TY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN p ekin, 111 IS RAIL: VARIABLE: 111 River FULLY ALLOCATED L ST COST ALTERNATIVE; VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED TRATF1C SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1152 5.76 7.94 BEAR. DESTINATION Pine Bluff. Ark Ark River ALL RAIL MILES 618 RAIL: 2.74 WATER: 1.78 THTA.I • 4.52 RAIL: 4.17 WATER : 1.98 TOTAL : 6.15 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 800 Barge Cost per Net Ton 2.41 .31 TOTAL 2.72 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 321 TRAFFIC SURVEY COS' ' ANALYSIS (SHORT TONS) 252 >TI NATION Vidalia,_ La. L. MlSS. ALL RAIL COMMODITY I & S Pipe TONNAGE DEAR ORIGIN Indiana Harbor, Ind. BEAR DE< 111. R. ALL KAIL: VARIABLE: 5.62 8.15 MILES 757 FULLY ALLOCATED 1.37 4 TO? A 7 • LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: "vartap.i.f. RAIL: 2.77 WATER : .14 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 3.95. WATER : 1.52 TOTAL: 5 47 RIVER ROUTE (B ar ge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER. ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ■__ LINE-HAUL CHARGE . ,1142 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ; CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : TOTAL Cost per Net To 2.70 . : ; .68 3.38 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS /, 5 io Cost Sheet 322 Iron and Steel COMMODITY BEAR ORIGIN chica g°» 111 RAIL: VARIABLE: 111 River FULLY ALLOCATED ST CDST ALTERNATIVE "VARIABLE TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1372 8.29 11.23 RAIL: 2.77 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL 3.95 BEAR DESTINATION T hlUodaux Jet . , La W1GIWW ALL RAIL MILES 977 WATER: 2.25 jnrw • 5.02 WATER. 2.54 TOTAL: 6.49 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER . HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1408 Barge TOTAL 3.05 .42 3.47 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. Cost Sheet. 323 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Iron and Steel J TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN in j Ri ^ ^^ BEAR DESTINATION W3GIWW ALL RAIL: 10 9S ALL VARIABLE: : ' RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED 15.30 MILES 13M RAIL: . 2.77 WATER : 4.61 T n TAI • 7.38 RAIL: 3.95 .. ._ . L T AXER:. 5.32 TOTAL: 9.27 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE . FULLY ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ' LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1922 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION . CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : TOTAL Cost per Net Tc 5.92 ■ .91 6.83 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS ' - 6 10 Cost Sheet 324 TRArnc SURVEY COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN, , RAIL: VARIABLE: Chicago, 111 111 River FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: COST ANALYSIS 7.51 10.42 2.77 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL 3.95 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 6 ' 'J BEAR DESTINATION Mobile, Ala E2GIWW ALL RAIL MILES 866 WATER: 2 - 2 IDXXLi 4 - 97 KATSR 2.49 TOTAL 6 .44 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ' • HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1 474. Barge 3.40 TOTAL .49 3.89 REMARKS: EXPLANATION -OF REFERENCE NARKS 10 Cost Sheet 325 COMMODITY Iron and Steel 111 River BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 7.51 10.42 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION Open Water ALL RAIL 866 MILES RAIL: 2.77 WATER: 4.37 T n T,*,I • 7.14 RAIL: 3.95 WATER : 5.02 TOTAL: 8.97 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barae-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION' CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1956 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net To • 5.70 .86 6.56 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 32( COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN St - Louis » Mo RAIL: L ' U - Miss - VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED IT COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 8?6 5.28 7.34 5.2! 7. 34 BEAR DESTINATION St Paul, Minn u.u. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 575 WATER: WATER TOTAL • 5.28 TOTAL: 7.34 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) . Miles Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ' ■ ■ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN < LINE-HAUL CHARGE - 661 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER . OTHER 2.95 .40 TOTAL 3.35 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 327 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: St. Louis, Mo L.U. Miss, FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVI VARIABLE _ RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: COST ANALYSIS 3.40 4.61 3.40 4.61 TONNAGE' (SHORT TONS) 791 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago,, 111. Ill River ALL RAIL MILES 284 WATER TOT M. 3.40 WATER' TOTAL: 4>61 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Toi CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 362 Barge TOTAL 1 •76 ■ : .21 1 97 . EXPLANATION "OF REFERENCE MARKS ■ 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 328 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN RAIL: VARIABLE : Alton, 111 L.U. Miss FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL TRAITIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 1.62 3.50 RAIL: 2.62 3.50 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 4T3 BEAR DESTINATION! Paducah, . Ky L. Ohio ALL RAIL MILES 173 WATER TOTAL: 2 - 6 ? . KATE P. TOTAL: 3 . 50 RIVER RC'JTE (Barge, Baroc-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER -__ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER .__ OTHER 251 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Net Ton .73 .08 .81 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 329 TRAFFIC SURVEY CCf-MODITY BEAR ORIGI ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Iron and Steel Alton, 111. L.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FIILLY. ALLOCATED COST ANALYSIS 3.40 4.61 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 696 BEAR DESTINATION Louisville, Ky M. Ohio ALL RAIL MILES 284 RAIL: 3.40 WATER: T/>TAI • 3.40 RAIL: 4.61 . WATER : . TOTAL: 4.61 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 583 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Tor 2.27 .27 2.54 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 330 CO/ iMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR OR I G I N_ . RAIL: VARIABLE: Alton, 111 L.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 35 ' 3 4.03 5.48 BEAR DESTINATION R°sedale, Misf M. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 360 RAIL: 4.03 WATER : TDT f \7 • 4.03 RATI,: 5.48 WATER : TOTAL: 5.48 RIVER ROUTE (Barce, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER • HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN •' LINE-HAUL CHARGE 418 ■ Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ' OTHER TOTAL .96 .09 1 .05 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 331 COMMODITY Iron and Steel • BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Alton, 111 L.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 4.06 5.54 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 633 BEAR DESTINATION Little. Rock Ark Ark. River ALL RAIL MILES 377 RAIL: 4.06 WATER: T n TAT • 4.06 RAIL: 5.54 WATER : TOTAL : 5.54 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 677 Barge TOTAL EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 Cost per Net Tci 2.02 .26 2.28 7 10 Cost Sheet 332 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN RAIL: VARIABLE: Alton, 111 L.U. Miss FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) li5 ° BEAR DESTINATION 6.54 9.06 RAIL: 1.05 1.50 New Orleans, La L. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 729 WATF.R; L13 TTV U I. ; 2.68 WATER : 1.84 TOTAL: 3. 34 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1058 Barge TOTAL 2.07 30 2.37 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 333 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY BEAR ORIGIN ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Iron and Steel Alton, 111 L.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED COST ANALYSIS 7.23 10.02 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 583 BEAR. DESTINATION Houston, , Texas W2GIWW ALL RAIL MILES 826 RAIL: 1.05 WATER: 4.27 TOT AJ ■ 5 .w RAIL: 1.50 WATER : 4.92 TOTAL : 6.42 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Baroe-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1343 Barge Cost TOTAL per Net Toi 3.41 .49 3.90 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 334 COMMODITY Iron and Steel L.U. Miss BEAR ORIGIN. RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED JT COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL. TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) X 6.03 8.34 6.03 5.34 BEAR DESTINATION Open Watgr ALL RAIL MILES 657 WATER : TOTAL 6.03 KATEr. TOTAL: 8.34 RIVER ROUTE (Baroe, Baroe-Rail or Truck) M i 1 e s Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1581 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 4.28 .68 4.96 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 335 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Iron and Steel TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1072 BEAR ORIGIN Decatur, Ala. Tenn River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: BEAR DESTINATION Minneapolis, Minn. 1.29 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST CHST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 11.45 U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 977 RAIL: 5.35 WATER : 1.97 T^TAI • 7.32 RAIL: . 7.65 WATER : 2,18 TOTAL: 9.83 FULLY ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ; HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1208 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Tc 4.50 .62 5.12 REMARKS : . EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 336 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN RAIL: VARIABLE : Paducah, Ky Tenn River FULLY ALLOCATED I COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2261 BEAR DESTINATION Alton, 111 2.64 3.52 RAIL: 1.23 RAIL: 1 - 6 8 L.U. Miss ALL RAIL MILES 175 WATER: 1.34 ygXALi 2.57 -HATER 1.43 TOTAL : 3.11 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) MMes Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER . ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN • LINE-HAUL CHARGE 267 , Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ■' , OTHER 1.25 .11 TOTAL 1 - 36 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 337 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Iron and Steel . . i hqq COMMODITY " TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 10 " Nashville, Tenn chinaon tii BEAR ORIGIN \ BEAR DESTINATION Ulca g.°». m Cumberland River m> River ALL KAIL. ALL VARIABLE: ±L±^ : ' RAIL 536 MILES 5.18 7.13 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST C^T ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 2 ' 77 WATER: 1-66 T rvrAT ■ " 4.43 ; FULLY ALLOCATED RAH.: b21 WATER : h^l T0TAL: 5*2-8 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Tot CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 798 Barge 3.03 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ; CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER \ - 40 3.43 TOTAL REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 338 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN Na shville, Tenn RAIL: VARIABLE: Cumberland River FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: TRAfriC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 3.77 5.13 1.23 FIJLLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: 1 ' 68 TONNAGE (SNORT TONS) 20757 BEAR DESTINATION Alton,. 1 ] 1 WATER : L.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 336 uatpd 1 * 66 2 - 89 WAIfiR; T"T4L: 1.83 TOTAL: 3.51 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met Ton :HARGE TO RIVER • • iANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN ' ' ' ' .INE-HAUL CHARGE A57 ' Barge 1.67 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ___ :harge EX RIVER . ; )THER -19 TOTAL 1.86 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 339 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN Ironton > ohl ° ' M. Ohio ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE Fin.LY ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 7.03 9.82 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 537 BEAR DESTINATION Minneapolis. Minn U.U. Miss ALL RAIL MILES 824 RAIL: 7.03 WATER : T n TAT • 7,03 RAIL: 9.82 ... .. .L 7 AXER : ._ - TOTAL: 9.82 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) MI les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER '• ' ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1508 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net To 5.04 . .75 l 5.79 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. ' Cost Sheet 340 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN Hunt ington, W. Va RAIL: VARIABLE: M. Ohio FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: TRAfflC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1289 4.71 6.46 1.9! RAIL: 2.79 BEAR DESTINATION Peoria, 11 1 111 River ALL RAIL MILES 469 WATER bll TOTAL -■ 4 - 5 - WATER 1 2.85 TOTAL: 5 . 64 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER - ■ ■ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1057 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 3.14 45 3.59 REMARKS: EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 341 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN Cincinnati, Ohio .,, r,. T , M - ohio ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 3.70 5.10 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1132 BEAR PEST I NAT I ON Alton,- Illinois L.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 487 RAIL: 1.23 WATER : 2.22 T n TAI • 3.45 RAIL: 1.68 WATER : 2.50 TOTAL : 4.18 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Baroe-Rail or Truck) MMes Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE • . HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 716 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Tor 2.14 .29 2.43 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 342 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN. RAIL: VARIABLE: Kan River FULLY ALLOCATED JT CHST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE TRATFIC SURV EY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1008 St. Albans, W. Va . 4.83 6.64 RAIL: 4.83 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL 6.64 BEAR DEST I NAT I ON Chicago, 7 1 1 i no | s 111 River ALL RAIL MILES 487 WATER : ° TQT,\I.- 4 .83 WATER T0TAL: 6.64 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1308 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 4.16 .60 4.76 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 343 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST COMMODITY Iron and Steel ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 832 BEAR ORIGIN Baden ' Pa> BEAR DESTINATION Cordova, .111 U. Ohio ALL RAIL: 5.68 VARTART.E: U.U. Miss. ALL RAH. 7.78 FULLY ALLOCATED MILES 602 LEAST CH^T ALTERNATIVE: 5 6g VARTARIF RAIL: WATER: T nT^ .' 5 - 68 PATT 7 ' 78 F"T,TY ALLOCATED KAIL: WATppS TOTAL: 7 .78 RIVER ROUTE (Barqe CHARGE TO RIVER , Barqe-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net To • HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1463. Barge 4.32 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1 .65 TOTAL 4.97 REMARKS . EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 344 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN Ali q ui PPa, Pa U. Ohio RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED T CfVST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FinXY ALLOCATED RAIL: TRAfFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 642 4.70 6.45 RAIL: 2.77 3.95 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, 111 111. River ALL RAIL MILES 468 WATER: 1.77 TOT.V . 4.54 WATEP. 1.97 TOTAL: 5>92 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1474 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 4.46 66 5.12 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 1 Cincinnati. Ohio 7. 10 Cost Sheet 345 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Aliquippa, Pa. U. Ohio FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FlfLLY ALLOCATED- RAIL TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 5.52 7.61 1.23 1.68 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3351 BEAR. DESTINATION Alton, _I11. L. ALL RAIL MILES U. Miss 584 WATER 3.21 TOTAL 4.44 WATER 3.67 TOTAL: 5.35 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1165 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net To 3.23 .47 3.70 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 346 COMMODITY Iron and Steel TRAFF COST IC SURVEY ANALYSIS TONNAGE BEAR DES (SHORT TONS) 600 BEAR ORIGIN Pittsburgh, Pa. IT 1 NAT ION Rock Island, I 1 1 RAIL: VARIABLE : Monongahela River 5.96 U.U. Miss ALL RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED 8.24 MILES 647 T COST ALTERNATIVE: 'VARIART.F. RAIL: 2.82 WATER: 03 - 28 TOTAT- 6.10 Firu.Y Ai.T.nrATFn RAIL: 4.26 . ■ , WATER : 3.74 TOTAL: 8.00 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER • - HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER 3THER 1471 Barge 4.40 .65 TOTAL 5.05 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 347 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIM M e m P his » Tenn ALL RAIL: M ' MisS ' VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 7.61 10.56 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 282Q BEAR DESTINATION St - Pau _l,. Minn. U. U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 880 RAIL: 5.28 WATER: 1.46 TOTAJ • 6.74 RAIL: 7.34 WATER : 1.61 TOTAL : 8.95 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIM LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1054 Barge TOTAL . EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 4.03 .55 4.58 iO Cost Sheet 348 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR OR I G I RAIL: VARIABLE: Memphis, Tenn M. Miss FULLY ALLOCATED T COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1338 5.2; 7.13 2.77 3.95 BEAR DESTINATION Chi (ago, U I 1 1 River ALL RAIL MILES 536 WATER: 1-77 t q T .u- 4 . 54 WATER 1.98 TOTAL: 593 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 894 Barge TOTAL Co s t per Net Ton 3.13 .43 3.56 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 349 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIM Memphis, Tenn M. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS FULLY ALLOCATED. 3.69 5.10 RAIL: 1-23 RAIL: 1.6) TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1340 BEAR DESTINATION Alton. -Ill L.U. Miss ALL RAIL MILES 333 WATER: 1.46 WATER ■ TOTAL : 2 . 69, 1.62 TOTAL: 3 . 30 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER — __ — ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIM LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 419 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Tc 1 .48 .18 1 .66 REMARKS : . EXPLANATION. OF REFERENCE NARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 350 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN RAIL: VARIABLE: Little Rock, Ark Ark River FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL TR AFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5.69 7.92 2.77 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL 3.95 106 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, ill 111. R. ALL _ RAIL MILES 633 WATER 2.35 L T ,MEr. 2.64 -TOTAL 5.12 TOTAL 6.SQ RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barce-Rail or Truck) Mi-les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER -____ ; ' ; HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LIME-HAUL CHARGE 9Q3 Barge 3.74 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER - _ OTHER TOTAL 57 4.31 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 351 COhMOD I TY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN Pines Bluff ' Ark Ark River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST Cnsr ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 4.24 5. TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 780 BEAR DESTINATION Alton,. Ill L.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 430 RAIL: 1.23 WATER : 2.17 T nT AT • 3.40 RAIL: . 1.68 WATER : 2.44 TOTAL : 4.12 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .629 Barge TOTAL Lost per Net T 2 .19 ) . 31 2 .50 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 352 Iron and Steel COMMODITY BEAR ORIGIN Baton Ro "ge, La ' L. Miss . RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED r COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE RAIL FULLY. ALLOCATED RAIL TRATFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3464 7.33 10.16 2.46 3.73 BEAR DESTINATION Keokuk, la U.U. Miss ALL RAIL MILES 840 WATER; hJl T OTM .- 5,17 3.10 TOTAL: fi ^ WATER : RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode lHARGE TO RIVER ' iamdling at river origin .ine-haul charge landliwg at river destination :harge ex river )THER 1146 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 3.37 49 3.86 EMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheef 353 10 I TY Iron and Steel BEAR OR I G I ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: New Orleans, La. Lower "Miss. TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALY SIS TONNAGE. (SHORT TONS) BEAR D EST I NAT I Or 6.66 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 9.69 RAIL: 2.77 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 3.95 102 Chicago, 111. 111. R. ALL RAIL MILES 930 WATER: 2.87 J'JQI. 5.64 .MATI 3.29 TOTAL : 7.24 - RIVER ROU TE (Barg e, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost: per Met T r CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1398 Barqe TOTAL 4.24 ■ .63 4.87 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 354 TRArric SURVEY Lhooity u '°" and steel COST a; »*ALYSIS TONNAGE BEAR DE< (SHORT TONS) 27134 BEAR ORIGIN ^ ^^^ U " iTIKATION Alton >. H- L. Miss. RAIL: VARIABLE: 6.53 L.U. Miss. ALL RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED 9.04 MILES 727 T COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABT.F. RAIL: 1.23 WATER : 2.87 T nT<\: • 4.10 3.28 TOTAL: 4<% Fin.T.Y Ai.T.nrATm RAIL: 1.68 Iv 7 ATEP. : RIVER RC'JTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1058 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Met Ten 2.89 .43 3.32 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 355 TRAFFIC SURVEY COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN Lockport, La. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: W1GIWW FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE F1FLLY ALLOCATED COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 72 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago,. II 9.06 12.69 111. River ALL Rail mi MILES RAIL: 2.77 WATER : 3.33 T<~>TAL • 6.10 RAIL: 3.95 WATER : 3.80 TOTAL : 7.7S RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1408 Barge TOTAL ■ ' 1 4 •71 .69 5 40 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 356 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN Harvey, La. RAIL: VARIABLE W1GIWW FULLY ALLOCATED >T COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL TRAfflC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) "^8 6.47 9.03 1.08 BEAR DESTINATION Portage, 111 L.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 745 WATER: 3.33 jnTAJ.: 4.4L 1.55 -UAXER- 3.80 TOTAL: ^25l RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1076 Barge TOTAL 3.38 .49 3.87 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 357 TRAFFIC SURVEY CCLUODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Houston, Texas W2GIWW FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED COST ANALYSIS 23 11.52 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 755 BEAR DESTINATION Rock Island, Illinoi U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 994 RAIL: 2.82 WATER: 4.82 TOTAI • 7.64 RAIL: 4.13 WATER : 5.55 TOTAL : 9.68 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER , HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1668 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 5.94 .92 6.86 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 358 COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN Houston, Texas W2GIWW TRAFFIC SU RVCY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 207 ,L RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED AST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 85 12.40 2.77 3.95 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, Illinois Illinois River ALL RAIL MILES 1082 WATER: 4.82 -WATER : 5.55 -TOTAL : 7.59 TOTAL: _9_^0 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 107 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 6.10 94 7.04 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 359 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Iron and Steel TONNAGE BEAR DES (SHORT TONS) 1197 Tl NAT ION Quinc yi Illinois BEAR ORIGIN Brownsville, Texas ' W3GIWW ALL RAIL: VARTART.F.r 10.44 U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 1307 FULLY ALLOCATED 14.65 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VATUART.F RAI L: 2 ' 19 WATER; 5.80 t/vtat • 7 - qq FITTTY AITOrATFn RAIL: J '^° .WATER : 6.68 TOTAL: 9qA RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net CHARGE TO RIVER — — HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN Ton LINE-HAUL CHARGE I 704 Barge 6.20 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER ' OTHER .98 TOTAL 7.18 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 360 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN Brownsville, Texas W3GIWW ,L RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED 10.77 15.12 !AST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL 2.77 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL 3.95 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2431 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago,. Illinoi Illinois River ALL RAIL MILES 1354 WATER 5.80 TOTAL Jii -WATER. 6.68 TOTAL: 10#63 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1922 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 7.07 1.11 .18 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 361 TRAFFIC SURVEY D ITY Iron and Steel BEAR ORIGIN Mobile > Alabama E2GIWW ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 9364 7.51 10.42 2.77 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 3 -95 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, Illinois Illinois River ALL RAIL MILES 866 WATER; 3.44 total- 6.21 WATER 3.93 TOTAL : 7.88 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER — ^— — «_, HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1505 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Barge TOTAL Cost per Net TO 4.84 .72 5.56 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 362 TRATFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3 mo BEAR ORIGIN Louisianna, Missouri , RAIL: VARIABLE : U.U. Miss. 6.14 FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 1.85 RAIL: 2.35 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 3.59 BEAR DESTINATION Omaha. Nfthraslr* Missouri River ALL RAIL MILES 377 WATER : 3.33 TOTAL- 5.68 WATER : 4.11 TOTAL: 7 . 70 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 734 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 6.86 1.08 7.94 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS Cost Sheet 363 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 75QQ BEAR ORIGIN Dubuque, Iowa BEAR DESTINATION Hartfo-rd. Illinois ALL RAIL: U " U - Miss ' ATT L -U- Miss. A "XO ALL VARIABLE: RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: 6.48 MILES 290 RAIL: ! WATER j 2 3__AI_ _L?2- FULLY ALLOCATED MILl LIZ WA TER' ° TOTAL_ L _6.48. RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER __, _______ __ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 375 ' Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER m ' OTHER TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 1.13 i .15 1.28 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 364 TRAF FIC SURV EY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TOWS) "07 BEAR ORIGIN Harailton ' Illinois BEAR DESTINATION Vidalia, La. I RAIL: VARIABLE: U.U. Miss. 9.10 FULLY ALLOCATED AST COST ALTERNATIVE: 11.78 VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 3.41 RAIL: 4.70 M. Miss, ALL RAIL MILES 774 /ATER: 1.03 HATER 1 TDTAl: 1.16 TOTAL 4.44 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode. CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 834 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net T on 1.59 .20 1.79 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 10 Cost Sheet 365 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals BEAR ORIGIN Clinton, la. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: U.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 11.17 14.40 4.40 FULLY ALLOCATED- RAIL: 5.97 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 4149 BEAR DESTINATION Norco,. La. L. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 958 WATE R; 1.41 TOTAL 5.81 WATER 1.61 TOTAL: 758 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mf les Mode Cost per Net To CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1342 Barge TOTAL 2.26 .33 2.59 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS ________ 6 10 Cost Sheet 366 TRAIT I C SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals BEAR ORIGIN Alban Y» Illinois LL RATL: VARIABLE U.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED SAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE rai: FULLY ALLOCATED RATL 12.00 15.46 4.40 5.97 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1378 BEAR DESTINATION l>l • Art hur, W2GIWW ALL _ RA I L MILES 10 34 WATER: 3.01 JSAXEEi. 3.48 7.41 JCQIAJ„ tota; 9.45 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck ) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1487 Barge TOTAL Cost per Mer Ton 3.86 .59 4.45 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 367 TRAFFIC SURV EY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1400 BEAR ORIGIN Chicago, 111. BEA R DESTINATION Decatur, Ala. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 111. River, FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL 7.19 9.26 4.01 5.23 Tenn River ALL RAIL MILES 569 WATER; 2.19 iJATER ' TOTAL 6.20 2.44 TOTAL: 7>67 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER _ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 899 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Tor 3.60 .46 4.06 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 368 COMMODITY TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 12224 BEAR ORIGIN Chicago, 111 ,L RAIL: VARIABLE 111. River FULLY ALLOCATED AST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL 5.48 7.10 7.10 BEAR DESTINATION Ironton, Ohio RAIL: 5.48 M. Ohio ALL RAIL 416 MILES WATER TOTAL-: $Jl JalAXER. TOTAL: 7>10 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1192 Barge TOTAL 4.78 .63 5.41 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 369 Industrial Chemicals COMMODITY BEAR ORIGIN Chica 8°> Illinois TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 6756 ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 111. River 5.58 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 7.23 BEAR DESTINATION Steubenville, Ohio U. Ohio ALL RAIL MILES 425 RAIL: 5.58 WATER: THT/\T • 5.58 RAIL: 7.23 -WATER.: TOTAL : 7.23 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER , .__ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1254 Barge 5.73 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION , CHARGE EX RIVER . OTHER -78 TOTAL 6.51 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 Cost Sheet 370 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals BEAR ORIGIN Chicago, Illinois LL RAIL: VARIABLE: 111. River FULLY ALLOCATED SAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 6.06 7.83 RAIL: 6.06 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 7.83 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 11580 BEAR DESTINATION Pittsburgh , Pa, Monongahcl.'i River ALL RAIL MILES 468 WATER: TOTAL, 6.06 -M ATER : TOTAL; 7.83 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER — . — — — HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1548 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 6.20 85 7.05 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 371 TRAFFIC SURVEY COfMODITY_ BEAR OR I Gil ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: COST ANALYSIS Industrial Chemicals Chicago, 111 111. River FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 6.82 8.79 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 8952 BEAR DESTINATION Memphis , Term M. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 536 RAIL: 4.01 WATER: .80 TOTAJ • 4.81 RAIL: 5.23 WATER : .88 TOTAL : 6.11 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER — _«_ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 755 Barge Cost per Met To n TOTAL 2.27 .28 2.55 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 372 TRAFF IC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3180 BEAR ORIGIN Joliet » Illinois BEAR DESTINAT | - N Avondale, ha 111. River T M . RAIL: L - M iss. VARIABLE: 10 ' 93 r^Vl MILES FULLY ALLOCATED 14-00 904 ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 3 ' 73 WATER: 1 - 42 T^TM. : 5 - 15 FULLY. M.T.orATFn RAIL: 4 ' 88 u VrEP : 1 - 6 ^ TOTAL: 6 . 51 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost: per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER , ___ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LIME-HAUL CHARGE 1344 Barge 2.75 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION , CHARGE EX RIVER , OTHER 39 TOTAL 3.14 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 373 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY BEAR ORIGIN, ALL RAIL: ABLE: Industrial Chemicals Chicago, Illinois 111. River 11.92 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 15.26 RAIL: 4.01 5.23 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1384 BEAR DESTINATION Berwick, La. ATMC ALL RAIL MILES 993 WATER: 1.93 TOTAL 5.94 2.20 -LIAT-ERJ TOTAL : 7.43 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck] Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1357 Barge TOTAL Cost pe r Net T( ; 3 .33 < ; < 47 i i 3 80 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 374 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals BEAR ORIGIN chica 8°' Illinois LL RAIL: VARIABLE : 111. River 11.91 FULLY ALLOCATED SAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 15.24 RAIL: 4.01 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL; 5.23 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION Houma, La WIG I WW ALL RAIL MILES 992 WATER : 1.52 TOT/VI. 5.53 WATER - 1.72 TOTAL: 6.95 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) M? les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER — «_*__ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1353 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net To n 3.31 .47 3.78 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 375 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 4064 BEAR ORIGIN C hica g°> Illinois .,, twtt HI- River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: BEAR DESTINATION Houston,. Texas 12.91 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE 16.51 W2GIWW ALL RAIL MILES 1082 RAIL: 4.01 WATER : 3.09 TDTAJ • 7.10 RAIL: 5.23 WATER : 3.56 TOTAL : 8.79 FULLY ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER | _. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Cost per Net Ton 1609 Barge TOTAL 4.49 .67 5.16 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. M 8 1 9 10 Cost Sheet 376 TRAFFIC S URVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals BEAR ORIGIN Chicago, Illinois RAIL: m " Rlv « VARIABLE: 11.07 FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE 14.18 RAIL: 4.01 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 5.23 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 800 BEAR DESTINATION Pascagpula, Miss E2GIWW ALL RA I L MILES 917 WATER : 1.93 TOTAL. 5.94 WATER 2.17 TOTAL ; 7.40 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER — -___ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN [ LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1314 Barge 3 - 28 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER - 46 TOTAL 3.74 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 377 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TOWS) 926 ORIGIN Paducah > K Y- BEAR DESTINATION Winona., Wisconsin Tenn - R - U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL: 8.18 ALL . RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 10.52 MILES 658 RAIL: 2.62 WATER: 2.08 T°TAT • 4.70 RAIL: 3.57 WATER : 2.30 TOTAL : 5.87 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net To n CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 777 Barge 3.29 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS J 6 2 7 .42 TOTAL 3.71 10 Cost Sheet 378 ; TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY ^"strial Chemicals T0H( , !AGE ($H0RT JQHS) 33576 BEAR ORIGIN Paducah > K Y' L RAIL: VARIABLE: Tenn. River FULLY ALLOCATED AST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL: 4.92 6.36 RAIL: 4-92 .36 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, Illino 111. ALL RAIL MILES River 364 WATER -XOXAL 4.92 WATER : TOTAL: 6 . 36 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 584 Barqe TOTAL Cost per Net: Ton 2.52 30 2.82 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 379 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals BEAR ORIGIN Kenova > w - Va - M. Ohio ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 10.07 12.91 RAIL: 10.07 12.91 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1277 BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minn. u.u. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 827 WATER : TOTAL: 10.07 WATER : TOTAL: 12.91 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1504 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 5.02 .73 5.75 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 380 TRATFIC SURVEY COST A NALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals T0|H!AGE (SH0RTT0NS) 919 BEAR ORIGIN RAIL: VARIABLE: Charleston, W. Va Kan. River 10.35 FULLY ALLOCATED ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 13.37 RAIL: 10 ' 35 FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL 13.37 BEAR DESTINATION St - Paul > Minn. U.U. Miss ALL RAIL MILES WATER JTHXAI^- i-JAXEKJ 885 10.35 TOTAL: 13 . 37 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER .,-... wjmiJ , HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1604 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 4.53 .71 5.24 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 381 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals BEAR ORIGIN Moundsville, W. Va. ALL RAIL: U ' ° hi ° VARIABLE: 11.02 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 14.22 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1200 BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minn, U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 945 t RAIL: 11.02 WATER : T<">TAT • 11.02 RAIL: 14.22 WATER : TOTAL: 14.22 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1701 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net T on 4.64 .75 5.39 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 382 TRAFFIC SUR VEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemical' BEAR ORIGIN Mi dland, Pa. L RAIL: VARIABLE: U. Ohio FULLY ALLOCATED 1ST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE HILLY ALLOCATED 5.29 6.95 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1278 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago. 111. 111. River ALL RAIL MILES 4 31 RAIL: 5.29 WATER : 'J'f'TA] • 5.29 RAIL: 6.95 WATER : TOTAL: 6.95 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER O'fHER REMARKS: 1492 Barge TOTAL Cost: per Net T ot 4.57 68 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 38: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 15399 BEAR ORIGIN Pittsburgh. Pa. BEAR DESTINATION Louis Lanna, Mo, ALL RAIL: Monongehela River rj.rj. Mlss> ALL . - RA I L MILES 66 4 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE 7. 10.24 RAIL: 7.89 WATER : T n TAL • 7.89 RAIL: 10.24 WATER : TOTAL : 10.24 FULLY ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER m _____ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1281 Barge 3.62 __ HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS: .54 TOTAL 4.16 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 384 COMMODITY TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1Q51Q BEAR DESTINATION BEAR ORIGIN Lake Charles, La , RAIL: VARIABLE W1GIWW 14.82 FULLY ALLOCATED 1ST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 19.03 RAIL: 8.29 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 12.57 WATER. St. Paul, Minn u.u. Miss . ALL RAIL MILES 1287 3.55 -LZAXERJ ^-d 3 . TOTAL: 1 1 ..8A TOTAL : 1 n . 70 . RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1794 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Tot 6.31 1.04 7.35 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 385 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1191 BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont > Texas BEAR DEST|MAT|0N St . Paul, Minn Miss . 1329 W2GIWW ALL RAIL: U.U. Miss 15.29 ALL VARIABLE : RA I L FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE 19.64 MILES 29 3.62 Hoi VARIABLE RAIL: WATER : ' x£HAJ^ FULLY AT.T.nr.ATFn RAIL: 12 ' 57 WA TER : 4 - 18 T0TAL: 16.75 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER __^ ^ „___ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN [ LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1810 Barge 6.38 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER -95 TOTAL 7.33 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 386 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals , BEAR ORIGIN. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Slidell, La. E1GIWW FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL RAIL: 9.71 12.56 2.53 3.59 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 10000 BEAR DESTINATION Louisianna, Mo U. ,U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 829 WATER : 2.58 TOTAL 5.11 -UAT.ER 2.96 TOTAL: 6.55 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1047 Barge TOTAL Cost: per Net Ton 3.00 .44 3-. 44 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 387 COMMODITY BEAR OR I G I N_ ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5000 BEAR DESTINATION Peru, .111. Slidell, La. E1GIWW 10.99 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED 14.08 111 . River ALL RAIL MILES 910 VE: RAIL: 3.29 WATER : 2.58 T n TAT • 5.87 RAIL: 4.31 W/VTFP : 2.96 TOTAL : 7.27 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER -__«„_ _, HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1205 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 3.64 .53 4.17 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 388 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) ST 1 NAT ION P 5000 BEAR ORIGIN Pa scagoula, Miss. BEAR D£ , L „, T E2GIWW III RAIL: VARIABLE: 10#37 ekin u 111. 111. River ALL RAIL 13.29 FULLY ALLOCATED MILES 2.95 854 .EAST CDST ALTERNATIVE: c , I. 54 VARTART.F. RAIL: WATER: 5.49 TOTAL • FT1T.T.Y AT.T.orATFn RAIL: 3 ' 37 WATER : 3.38 TOTAL : 6.75 RIVER ROUTE (Barqe, Barqe-Rail Miles CHARGE TO RIVER or Truck) Mode Cost per Net Ton HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1156 Barge 3.76 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .54 TOTAL 4.30 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 389 COMMODITY TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Industrial Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS BEAR ORIGIN Birmingham, Ala ,,, „ 1T , Warrior River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : :.14 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 10.46 RAIL: .14 FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 10.46 11437 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago,, 111. I 111. River ALL RAIL MILES 654 WATER ; TOTAL 8.14 WATER : TOTAL: 10.46 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER __ _«_ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1772 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Tor 6.59 1.00 7.59 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 390 COMMODITY TRAfTIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : Louisiana, Missouri U. U. Miss. 2.29 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 3.15 RAIL: 2.29 FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL: 3.15 3629 BEAR DESTINATION New Haven, Missouri Missouri River ALL RAIL MILES 162 WATER : TOTAL 2.29 WATER TOTAL: 3^15. RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 168 Barge TOTAL 1.47 .16 1.64 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 391 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN Louisiana, Missouri U. U. Miss ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED. 3.54 4.73 RAIL 3.54 RAIL: 4.73 5173 BEAR DESTINATION Henderson. KPnt-n^l L. Ohio ALL RAIL MILES 274 WATER : WATER ; TOTAL- 3.54 TOTAL: 4>73 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 425 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Toi 1.49 , ' .17 1.66 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 392 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 140 ° BEAR ORIGIN Minneapolis, Minn. BEAR DESTINATION Sheffield, Ala. U. U. Miss. Tenn. River ML RAIL: VARIABLE: 11,23 R aVl MILES 9.64 FULLY ALLOCATED 14.49 .EAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 8 ' 41 WATER: 1.99 t dt^ T -lO^n FULLY. AT.T.nrATFn RAIL: 14 - 49 wa T FR : TOTAL: 14.4 9 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1154 Barge 3. 48 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ' CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER -49 TOTAL 3 - 97 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE HARKS 7. Cost Sheet 393 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2241 BEAR ORIGIN Jjf^fj^fJ! M 1530 ^! BEAR DESTINATION Louisville, Kentucky u- U. Miss. M. Ohio ALL RAIL: 4.60 ALL VARIABLE: RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED 6.07 MILES 369 RAIL: 2.35 WATER : 2.01 T nT AL' 4.36 RAIL: 3.59 WA,TER : 2.24 TOTAL: 5.83 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 613 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL Cost per Net Tc 2 .25 .27 2 .52 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 394 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 30 39 | BEAR ORIGIN Louisiana, Missouri BEAR DESTINATION Memphis, Tenn . U. U. Miss. M. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 4 ' 95 rAK FULLY ALLOCATED 6.51 MILES 400 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 2.35 WATER : .80 T°TAI • 3.15 RAIL: 3.59 WATER : ■ .88 TOTAL: h L1 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 502 Barge 1/ HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER ' -12 TOTAL 1.26 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 7. 10 Cost Sheet 395 TRAFFIC SURV EY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals BEAR ORIGIN Burlington, la. U. U. Miss, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : 10.23 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 13.21 RAIL 3.67 FULLY. ALLOCATED- RAIL: 5.04 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5650 BEAR DESTINATION Burns ide. La. k L. Miss. 1 ALL RAIL MILES 874 WATER 1.36 TOTAL: 5-Q3 WATER : 1.55 TOTAL : 6.59 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ' " HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1172 Barge TOTAL Cost per Met Tor 1.96 .26 2.22 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 396 COMMODITY TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: Chicago, 111 111. River 3.89 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 5.08 RAIL: 3.89 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL 5.08 1467 BEAR DESTINATION Granite City, 111 L. U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 273 WATER : JlDXAl . 3.89 WATER TOTAL: 5 . 08 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 343 Barge 1.81 .20 TOTAL 2.01 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 397 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN Chicago, ill. BEAR DESTINATION Sheffield, Ala. 1413 111. River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 7.21 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 9.29 RAIL: 4.01 FITLLY. ALLOCATED- RAIL: 5.23 Tenn. River ALL RAIL MILES 571 WATER; 2.00 TOTAL : 6. 01 WATER : 2.11 TOTAL: 7.34 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ___«^ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 822 Barge Cost per Net Ton TOTAL 3.30 .41 3.71 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. Cost Sheet 398 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1176 BEAR ORIGIN Marseilles, 111. BE AR DESTINATION Louisville, Ky. ' 111. River M . ohio ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : 4 • 59 FULLY ALLOCATED 5.9 7 ALL RAIL MILES 336 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 4 ' 59 WATER: T ot at_- 6 - 5Q FULLY AT.T.OPATFD RAIL: 5 ' 97 ua T ER : ° TOTAL: 5.97 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ,' ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 798 Barge 3.23 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ' CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .37 TOTAL 3.60 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 399 COMMODITY BEAR ORIGIN Joliet, 111. TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1422 BEAR DESTINATION Avon dale , La. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : 111. River 10.53 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED 13.48 L. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 868 RAIL: 3.73 WATER : 1.42 TOTAL* ■s.is RAIL: 4.88 WATER : 1.62 TOTAL: fi.™ RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER __ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1342 Barge HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 2. 8S TOTAL 39 3.24 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 400 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 5204 BEAR ORIGIN Granite City, 111. '" L. U. Miss. IlLL RAIL: VARIABLE: 4-54. FULLY ALLOCATED .EAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE 6.15 RAIL: 4.54 FULLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: 6 ' 15 BEAR DESTINATION Muscatine, la, U. u. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 267 WATER ; 9_ TOTAL; 4,54 MATER TOTAL 6.15 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 272 Barge TOTAL 1.40 .16 1.56 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7 10 Cost Sheet 401 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TOMS) 3007 BEAR ORIGIN Sheffield, Ala. BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, 111. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : Tenn . Rive r 7,2k FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED ^TFT 111. River ALL RAIL MILES 571 RAIL: 4.01 WATER : 1.67 T n TAL * S.fift RAIL: 5.23 WATER : 1.86 TOTAL: 7.09 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER -^_^, .,_! '. HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 825 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 3.05 .40 3.45 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 402 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1440 BEAR ORIGIN Ironton, Ohio BEAR DESTINATION Havana, 111. ILL RAIL: M ' ° hi ° VARIABLE: 5 ' 68 R AK FULLY ALLOCATED ■ 7.45 MILES 466 .EAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: 3 ' 39 u A TER : 2 ' 61 TOTAL: 6Q0 VARIABLE RATL: 2 ' 56 WATER : 2. 29 T nry .4.85 RIVER ROUTE (Barge. Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 970 Barge 3.04 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER -42 TOTAL 3 - 46 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 403 COMMODITY TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Agricultural Chemical s TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGIN, ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : Helena, Ark, M. Miss. 11.04 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 14.23 RAIL: 8.29 FULLY. ALLOCATED- RAIL: 12 ' 57 1347 BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minn U. U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 946 WATER: 1.43 TOTAL : 9 - 72 WATER : 1.62 TOTAL : 14.19 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met To CHARGE TO RIVER . HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN . LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1133 Barge 4.00 ,' HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER TOTAL .58 4.58 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 404 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2808 | BEAR ORIGIN Caruthersville . Mo , BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, 111 * . M. Miss. 111. R. ALL RAIL VARIABLE : 5.82 ALL FULLY ALLOCATED 7.52 RAIL MILES 476 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 4 ' 01 WATER: LlPi T"™ T .- 5.03 FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL: 5 - 23 WATER ; 1 ' 1.3 TOTAL: 636 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 649 Barge 2.60 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION - CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .33 TOTAL 2.93 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS \ 3 10 Cost Sheet 405 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1293 BEAR ORIGIN Lake Charles, La. BEAR DESTINATION Dubuque, la. W1GIWW ALL RAIL: 13. U. U. Miss. ALL VARIABLE: - LJ - oy RAIL MILES 1204 FULLY ALLOCATED 17. LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: ILl 04 . WATER: 3.55 T nr^_- 8.59 FULLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: 6 ' 79 ua TFI >: 4.13 TOTAL: 10t92 : RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Tor CHARGE TO RIVER ___ ___ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN . LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1534 Barge 5.26 . I HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .79 TOTAL 6.05 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 406 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals ^ BEAR ORIGIN Lake Charles, La. WlGIWW ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: 11.66 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE 15.02 RAIL: 3.73 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 2398 BEAR DESTINATION Joliet, ill. 111. River ALL RAIL MILES 1002 W ATER: 3 -55 t qtat • 7 . 28_ FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 4.88 WATER 4.13 TOTAL: 9 . 01 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER . HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1411 Barge Cost per Net Ton TOTAL 4.94 .74 5.68 REMARKS : I 3 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 407 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1305 BEAR ORIGIN Beaumont, Tex. BEAR DESTINATION Muscatine . la .- W 2GIWW " ~— "'- ALL RAIL: 12 . 32 ALL VARIABLE : _ JZ RA 1 1 FULLY ALLOCATED 15.87 U. U. Miss MILES 1063 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RA1L: 4 ' °i WATER: 3 - 62 T^ AT.- 7.63 FULLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: 5 - 2 -3 HAI ESJ 4.18 T0TAL: 9.41 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER ' ' HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN . LINE-HAUL CHARGE 1421 Barge 4 . 82 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION ' CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .72 TOTAL 5.54 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 408 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Agricultural Chemicals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 3820 l BEAR ORIGIN Pascagoula, Miss . E2GIWW ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : 8 - 91 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: BEAR DESTINATION Pekin,.Ill. 11.54 VARIABLE FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: 2.54 RAIL: 3.37 111. River ALL RAIL MILES 757 WATER: 2.85 T nry • 5.39 WATERJ 3.28 TOTAL: 6>65 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER — __*_ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1152 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 3.74 54 4.28 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 409 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Non-Metallic Minerals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1114 BEAR ORIGIN Ottawa, 111. BEAR DESTINATION St. Charles, Mo, 111. River Missouri River ALL RAIL: 2 71 ALL VARIABLE : ^* /x RA I L FULLY ALLOCATED 3 ' 92 MILES 284 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RA1L: 2 ' 71 WATER : TQmU—ld 1 FTILLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: 3 - 92 WAT ER : ° TOTAL: 3t92 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Tor CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE 294 Barge 1.60 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION . CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER .20 TOTAL 1.80 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 410 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMOD I TY Non-Metallic Minerals BEAR ORIGIN Ottawa, 111. &L RAIL: VARIABLE 111. River FULLY ALLOCATED EAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL: 2.71 3.92 2. 71 3.92 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS L549 BEAR DESTINATION St. Louis, Mo U. U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 284 W ATER: TOTAL 2.71 WATER TOTAL: 3> g 2 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER -_«_«_ _ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN " LINE-HAUL CHARGE 234 Barge i. 38 HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS ,16 TOTAL 1.54 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 411 COMMODITY TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS Non-Metallic Minerals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR ORIGII ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : Chicago, 111. 111. River 9.02 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE 13.27 RAIL 2.71 FULLY. ALLOCATED- RAIL: 3.92 2863 BEAR DESTINATION Houston, .Tex. W2GIWW ALL RAIL MILES 1154 WATER 3-22 TOTAT , 5.93 WATER : 3.68 TOTAL : 7..6Q RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Tor CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1593 Barge TOTAL 4.42 .65 5.07 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 7. 10 Cost Sheet 412 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Non-Metallic Minerals BEAR ORIGIN Cumberland River ALL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE : VARIABLE 3.59 .5.24 RAIL: 2.34 FULLY. ALLOCATED RAIL: 3.56 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) BEAR DESTINATION u - U. Miss ALL RAIL MILES 411 WATER ; 1.19 TOTA] 3.53 WATER. 1.28 TOTAL: 4.84 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Hi les Mode Cost per Met Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 408 Barge TOTAL 1.75 20 1.95 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 413 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Non-Metallic Minerals BEAR ORIGIN New Orleans, La. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : L. Miss 9.62 FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE 13.89 RAIL: 5.52 FTTLLY ALLOCATED- RAIL: 7.93 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 1200 BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minn. U. U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 1269 WATER : 2.87 TOTAL . 8.39 WATER : 3.28 TOTAL: 11.21 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Miles Mode CHARGE TO RIVER _ _^_ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE- HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 1723 Barge Cost per Net Ton TOTAL 5.55 .83 6.38 REMARKS : EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 1 10 Cost Sheet 414 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Non-Metallic Minerals TONNAGE (SHORT TONS] BEAR ORIGIN New Orleans, La. L. Miss. LL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED SAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED. 6.91 10.06 RAIL: 2.71 RAIL: 3.92 1400 BEAR DESTINATION Chicago, in 111. River ALL RA I L MILES 930 WATER : 2.87 -EOTAL 5.58 WATER : 3.28 TQTAL: 7 90 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1373 Barge TOTAL 4.15 .62 4.77 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 415 COMMODITY Salt TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS TONNAGE (SHORT TONS! BEAR ORIGIN St. Louis, Mo. L. U. Miss. ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : FULLY ALLOCATED 5.52 1.28 LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: 5.52 FULLY. ALLOCATED. RAIL: 8 ' 28 1408 BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul. Minn U. U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 575 WATER : TOTAL: ').')? WATER TOTAL: 8.28 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER ____ HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER 668 Barge TOTAL Cost per Net Ton 2 .98 40 3. 38 REMARKS EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 416 COMMODITY Molasses BEAR ORIGIN St " Paul > Minn tt dat7 u - u - Miss - iLL RAIL: VARIABLE: FULLY ALLOCATED EAST COST ALTERNATIVE VARIABLE RAIL FULLY ALLOCATED RAIL TRA FFIC SURV EY COST ANALYSIS 8.29 10.65 8.29 10.65 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 14544 BEAR DESTINATION St. Loyis, MO L.U. Miss. WATER : WATER ALL RAIL MILES 575 TOTAL : 8 - 29 TOTAL 10.65 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 668 Barge TOTAL Cost per Met Ton 1.78 .26 2.04 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 417 COMMODITY Molasses BEAR ORIGIN St - Paul > Minn ALL RAIL: VARIABLE : U.U. Miss. FULLY ALLOCATED LEAST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE RAIL: FULLY ALLOCATED. RAIL: TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS 17.85 20.32 8.29 12.57 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) i-^?7 BEAR DESTINATION Baton -RongP, La L. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 1259 WATER : 1.93 TOTAL 10.22 WATER 1 2.14 TOTAL: 14.71 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1698 Barge TOTAL -2^4 J .55 4.09 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 10 Cost Sheet 418 TRAFFIC SURVEY COST ANALYSIS COMMODITY Molasses BEAR ORIGIN Baton Rou § e ' La ' L RAIL: VARIABLE: L. Miss. 17.04 FULLY ALLOCATED AST COST ALTERNATIVE: VARIABLE FULLY. ALLOCATED 19.35 TONNAGE (SHORT TONS) 30089 BEAR DESTINATION St. Paul, Minn. U.U. Miss. ALL RAIL MILES 1259 RAIL: 8.29 WATER: 3.17 T nT ^L • 11.46 RAIL: 12.57 .... WATER : 3.58 TOTAL : 16.15 RIVER ROUTE (Barge, Barge-Rail or Truck) Mi les Mode Cost per Net Ton CHARGE TO RIVER HANDLING AT RIVER ORIGIN LINE-HAUL CHARGE HANDLING AT RIVER DESTINATION CHARGE EX RIVER OTHER REMARKS : 1698 Barge TOTAL 5.85 .87 6.72 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS 6 10 Cost Sheet 419