RSITY HEATING SYSTEM TIurch Kerr & Co. orporated. Engineers. New York, U.S.A., June n, 1904. L. Williams , Treasurer , Cornell University , Ithaca , iV. K. ar Sir ;— Mr. Steele has completed his report on the University steam gener- ring and distributing system and we are pleased to hand you here¬ with enclosed a copy of this report with two white prints upon which we have in red and black indicated the present piping and the pro¬ posed extensions of the immediate future, the latter being for the supply of steam to the new Goldwin Smith and Rockefeller Halls. Two systems have been considered, one, which is called Plan One in the report is an extension of the present arrangement. The second, called Plan Two in the report is for the supplementing of the present arrangement with a second steam generating plant which is shown in black ink as near Sibley. This, however, might be in any one of the nearby buildings if desired or at some such point as indicated. We have carefully considered the various features connected with the deterioration of the present plant, the extension of the University and the fact that 90 per cent, of the heating is on the northern half of the Campus while the steam producing plant is almost at the southern end of the southern half. We have, as you will notice, suggested slightly different methods of entering Goldwin Smith Hall and Rockefeller Hall than shown in the plans for the heating of these two buildings. This we have done sug¬ gestively, it being suggested economy over and above the other meth¬ od. It is our understanding that such manner of entry to Rockefeller Hall and possibly Goldwin Smith Hall are not desired from the stand¬ point of design of matters within the buildings themselves but now that the consideration of the general heating and distributing system is up it might be well for us all to review these two items with a view to somewhat more economical performance. We would call your attention to the estimate attached to the report which shows in approximate figures the cost which you might expect to incur should you follow out one of the proposed methods. This estimate of cost is so made that it reflects sections of the work to en¬ able you as much as possible to plan how much you wish to do, we having however, assumed a certain minimum which by either the first or the second plans falls around $50,000. In general, after fully canvassing the entire situation we feel that Plan No. One, namely the extension of the boiler plant as at present located with proper enlargement of the feec to attempt at the present at least, the installation^ plant for assisting at the time of maximum loading? This because the cost of extension is a trifle less for yoiir^ needs, while the ultimate cost of renewing of the various mal you must doubtless soon face is against the Plan No. Two. caused by the fact that you have now installed a system whose eral lines would not be changed by Plan No. One. If you could back to a clean slate and could plan some of the buildings near Sfll ley, such as Franklin Hall, Sibley College itself, or Lincoln Hall, s is used on the south half of the campus, nearest the central heating station. This necessitates the transmission of a large quantity of steam over a considerable distance, which re¬ quires large mains, and results in a consequent loss from condensa¬ tion. These conditions have raised the question of the advisability of placing the new boilers, which are required for enlarging the present plant, at a point nearer the center of the heating load. We have therefore developed and studied two plans or systems as follows : Plan No. i: Enlarge present boiler house and coal bunker to provide for 1000 H.P. of boilers and provide steel chimney for same. Install 500 H.P. of boilers together with feed pump, return water tank and boiler room piping. Replace 8 7/ steam main from point opposite Sage Col¬ lege to Boardman Hall with io // pipe carried in concrete tunnel. Provide steam main from Boardman Hall to Goldwin Smith and Rockefeller Halls. Provide new reducing valves and traps in old buildings where necessary. Replace present mains and branches with new pipe in tunnels or trenches from time to time as present pipe fails. Plan No. 2 : Construct new boiler plant at some northern point either in or near Sibley College or in the basement of some one of the buildings. Plant to have present capacity of 500 H.P. and ultimate capacity of not less than 1000 H.P. Connect boiler plant by a system of mains to the new buildings and the old distributing system near Boardman Hall and Sibley College. Pipe to be carried in concrete tunnel or trenches. Provide new reducing valves and traps in old buildings where necessary. Replace present mains and branches with new pipe in tunnels or trenches from time to time as present pipe fails. Plan No. 1 presents the following advantages : The location of the present plant is not conspicuous and does not detract from the appearance of the Campus. It is near the edge of the Campus so that coal and ash wagons will have to transverse but a short length of the roadways. All the firemen will be employed in one building. Practically all the water of condensation will be re¬ turned by gravity to the boiler house. The principal disadvantage of Plan No. 1 is that it is such a great distance from the center of the heating load, that large steam pipes are required which result in a considerable loss from condensation and also the pressure on the northern part of the Campus is too low to permit the operation of steam driven ventilating fans. The advantages possessed by plan No. 2 are that it would be located near the center of the heating load and smaller mains would be used. Sufficient steam pressure could be maintained at the various buildings 7 to operate steam driven ventilating fans and thus effect a large saving in operating. The principal disadvantages of Plan No. 2 are : The plant unless located in the basement of one of the buildings will be quite prominent and a tall chimney will be unsightly. The coal wagons will have to cross the Campus and this will tend to cut up the roadways and increase the cost of maintaining them. It will be more difficult to superintend the operation of two plants than one although the cost of firemen will be no greater with two boiler plants than with one. With the boiler plant located east of Central Avenue the water of condensation from buildings west of Central Avenue could not be returned by gravity, and pumps would be required. Until extensive additions are made to the University Buildings the boiler plant provided for in Plan No. 2 would need be operated only during the three winter months and the present steam heating plant would supply the required heat during the balance of the year. Two estimates have been prepared, showing the present and ulti¬ mate cost of both plans. These estimates show that practically the same expenditure is required at the present time for both plans, but that the ultimate cost of Plan No. 1 will be about $13,600 less than Plan No. 2. Estimates have been made and are appended hereto. Respectfully submitted, WESTINGHOUSE, CHURCH, KERR & & 0 . W. D. STEEEE. ESTIMATED COST OF PLAN NO. 1. The estimated cost to W. C. K. & Co. of extending present boiler plant and changing the steam main is as follows : Boiler House building and coal bunker, extended to pro¬ vide for 1000 H.P. boilers, including brick-lined stack, 7 ft. x 150 ft_$16,100 00 Two 250 H.P. B. & W. boilers, erected, including brick¬ work ; also feed pump, piping, smoke flue, etc- 12,100 00 New steam and return mains (Section B.C.), io 7/ steam pipe and return pipe, carried in concrete tunnel, Sage College manhole, to Boardman Hall. Old mains not disturbed between power house and Sage College manhole (Section A.B.) or from Boardman Hall to Lincoln Hall (Section C.D., E. & P\)_ 9,200 00 Cost of reducing valves and traps in buildings not now provided with ones in good working order_ 2,650 00 8 Branch main to Goldwin Smith and Rockefeller Halls, in basement of Boardman Hall and in tunnel to Goldwin Smith Hall and in branch to Rockefeller Hall in con¬ crete trench_ Total cost of work required in 1904_ Reduction in cost if pipe is carried in a concrete trench in¬ stead of a tunnel_ Cost of replacing old main from Sage College manhole to present boiler plant when pipe fails. Pipes to be carried in concrete tunnel_ Reduction in cost if pipe is carried in a concrete trench instead of in a tunnel_ Cost of replacing old main (Section C.D.E.) when present pipe fails. 8 // steam pipe and return pipe, Board- man Hall to White Hall manholes—Pipes to be carried in concrete tunnel_ Reduction in cost if pipe is carried in the basements of Morrill, McGraw and White Halls instead of in tunnel Reduction in cost if pipe is carried in a concrete trench instead of in a tunnel_ Cost of replacing old branch pipes when they fail with new pipes in concrete trenches. This includes replacing W' branch main from White Hall to Lincoln Hall_ SUMMARY—PUAN NO. I. Building extension and chimney_ Boiler plant_ Replacing old main (Section B.C.), Sage College to Board- man Hall in tunnel_ Branch pipes to Goldwin-Smith and Rockefeller Halls_ Changing reducing valves and traps_ Replacing old main (Section A.B.), Sage College to boiler house in tunnel_ Replacing old main (Section C.D.E.), Boardman Hall to White Hall in tunnel_ Replacing branch pipes to present buildings and branch main E. F. in concrete trench_ Ultimate cost_ Reduction in cost if pipes are carried in concrete trenches instead of in tunnels : Section B.C.—Sage to Boardman, also new main to Goldwin Smith_$3,300 00 Section A.B.—Boiler house to Sage_ 3,000 00 Section C.D.E.—Boardman to White 3,000 00 Ultimate cost if trenches are used_ 10.500 00 150,550 00 3.300 00 12.500 00 3,000 00 12,200 00 2,700 00 3,000 00 13,000 00 $16,100 00 12,100 00 9,200 00 10.500 00 2,650 00 12.500 00 12,200 00 13,000 00 $88,250 00 9.300 00 $78,950 00 ESTIMATED COST OF PLAN NO. 2. The estimated cost to W. C. K. & Co. for a boiler plant, north of Sibley College, laying a new main, and changing old mains, is as follows : Boiler House building and coal bunker to provide for 1000 H.P. boilers, including brick-lined steel stack, 7 ft. x 150 ft., or short stack and forced draft_$16,500 00 Two 250 H.P., B. & W. boilers, erected, with feed, pump, piping, smoke flue, etc_ 12,100 00 New steam return main (Section F.I.H.C.) laid in concrete tunnel, 8 7/ pipe to Sibley, 6 /7 pipe from Sibley Hall to Boardman Hall and 3 // return pipe ; also the branch pipe to Rockefeller Hall in concrete trench_ 19,000 00 Reducing valves and traps in buildings not now provided with ones in good working order_ 2,650 00 Total cost of work required in 1904_$50,250 00 Additional costs if pipe is carried in tunnel instead of through the basements of Sibley, Lincoln Hall and Boardman Hall_ 3,600 00 Reduction in cost if all pipe is laid in concrete trench in¬ stead of in a tunnel_ 5,200 00 Cost of replacing old main (Section A.B.C.) from present boiler plant to Boardman Hall when pipe fails. Pipe to be carried in concrete tunnel_ 21,000 00 Reduction in cost if pipe is carried in concrete trench in¬ stead of in a tunnel_ 5,500 00 Cost of replacing old main (Section C.D.E.F.) from Board- man Hall to Sibley when present pipe fails. Pipe to be carried in tunnel_ 213600 00 Reduction in cost if pipe is carried in basements of Morrill, McGraw, White, Franklin and Sibley, instead of in a tunnel_ 6,400 00 Reduction in cost if concrete trench is used instead of tunnel_ 5,400 00 Cost of replacing old branch pipe with new pipe in concrete trench_ 9,000 00 SUMMARY—PUAN NO. 2 . Building and chimney_$16,500 00 Boiler plant_ 12,10000 New main, new boiler house to Boardman, in tunnel and basements_ 19,000 00 Changing reducing valves and traps_ 2,650 00 Replacing old main (Section A.B.C.) Boardman to old boiler house in tunnel___ 21,000 00 IO Replacing old main (Section F.I.H.C.), Boardman to Sibley in tunnel_ 21,600 00 Replacing branch pipes to present buildings in trenches,, 9,000 00 Ultimate cost___$101,850 00 Reduction in cost if pipes are carried in concrete trenches instead of in tunnels : Section F.I.H.C.—Sibley boiler house to Boardman_$5,200 00 Section A.B.C.—Present boiler house to Boardman_ 5,500 00 Section C.D.E.F.—Present main, Board- man to Sibley_ 5,400 00 16,100 00 Ultimate cost if trenches are used_ $85,750 00 A. CORNELL UNIVERSITY HEATING SYSTEM. High Pres. Low Pres. Mains. System. Building. Supply. Return. Main. Riser. Steam Pres Remarks. in. in. in. in. lbs. Armory_2 1# 3 5 Gymnasium __ iy 1% 3 5 Sage Cottage__ 3 iY 3 6 Sage College.. 52427 Barnes Hall_3 2 5 2 10 1/2 Sage Chapel __ 3 iy Stimson Hall.. 4 Boardman Hall 41^5 4 4 3 Library-4 1% 5 2 5 4 3 Morrill Hall.. 324 2^ y 2 Reducing valve 2" Curtis on high pressure main in boiler room. Bundy trap. Same reducing valve and trap as armory. Reducing valve, Curtis, works O. K. with high initial pressure. Traps, 1" Bundy to drain steam main and supply to house. i // Dean for returns. Reducing valve, north side, Mason. Not used. Using by-pass. South side, 3 // Holly in use. Traps, North side, Y" Curtis ex¬ pansion. South side, Y" Holly. Not used ; using Y" by-pass. Reducing valve, Balanced valve. Not used. Use supply valve throttled. Trap, 1 % Davis. Reducing valve, 2" Locke, O. K. Trap, \ Yz" Holly. Not used. Using by-pass. Reducing valve, balanced. Not used. Using valve throttled. Trap, 1 Y" Walworth Bucket. Not used. Using by-pass. Reducing valve, none. Using valve throttled. Trap, \Y" Curtis. Not used. Using by-pass. Reducing valve, 3" old Holly. Not used. Trap, 1 Yz" Holly. Not used. Using by-pass. 3 2 12 in. in. in. in. lbs. White Hall_4 McGraw Hall. 3 Morse Hall_4 Chem. Annex. 4 Franklin Hall. 4 Dynamo Dab_ 2 X / Z Sibley, West.. 4 Center. 4 East_4 Sibley Shops, West __ 4 East_4 Found’v Lincoln Hall.. 4 3 4 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 2 >4 /4 Reducing valve, 5" old Holly. Not used. 2 Trap, none. Using * 4 " by-pass. i /4 5 Reducing valve, 3 // old Holly. Not used. Trap, i] 4 " Holly. Not used. Using by-pass. Reducing valve, 3 // Holly, new style- Trap, Bundy. 2 7 Reducing valve, 4 7/ Locke, O. K. Traps, 2 Mason on coils ; 1 Bundy on direct; 1 % ff Bundy on end of supply main. \ x /z 5 Reducing valve, t> // Holly. \]4 Trap, 1 " Bundy. 5 Reducing valve, none. Trap, Bucket. Not used. Using by-pass. Note.—Supply from Franklin Hall mains. 5 Reducing valve, Holly, O. K. Trap, none. Using by-pass. 5 Reducing valve, Locke, O. K. Trap, 1 Bundy. 5 Reducing valve, Holly. Trap, none. Using by-pass. 3 Reducing valve, . Trap. 2 Reducing valve, 4" Holly. Trap, 1" Bundy. Note.—Supply from Mech. Lab. mains. 2^4 3 2 3 Reducing valve, new style Holly ‘ O. K. Trap, 2 2 y 2 " Walworth Bucket, each side of building. T 3 B. Buildings. Cubic contents of build¬ ing above ground. Estimated B.T.U.'s re¬ quired per hour zero weather , 2% B.T.U.'s per cubic ft. Heating surface now in buildings. Armory_ cu. ft. 190,000 475,000 I,o6o Gymnas._ Sage Cott.__ 165,000 115,000 413,000 288,000 L265 Sage Coll.__ 93 °, 000 2,325,000 10,630 Barnes Hall_ Sage Chapel 196,000 141,000 490,000 1 352,000 1,990 D 360 Ind. 1,300 Stimson Hall 619,000 - r 1,548,000 H. 1,548,000 V. . 5,740 D 3,800 Ind. Boardman_ 405,000 - 1,013,000 H 1,013,000 V j- 5,ooo Library _ 741,000 - 1,852,000 H 1,852,000 V j- 7,750 Morrill Hall. 366,000 915,000 McGraw_ 618, ooo< ' 1,545,000 H 1 l 450,000 V J White Hall_ 366,000 9 I 5 ,oo° r Morse Hall _ 646,000 - 1,615,000 H 1,615,000 V - l J Chemical_ 449,000 •. 1,123,000 H 1 2,246,000 V Franklin_ 408,000 x 1,020,000 H 510,000 V Kind of Heating Surface. Bundy single col. high. Coils i" pipe and Bundy. Standard 38 // high, Bundy Columbia 3s' 7 , Indirect stacks 3-200 sq. ft. 2968 sq. ft. Bundy Col¬ umbia 2 Col. 7662 sq. ft. Bundy Old 1 Col. Bundy Columbia 38 // high. All D. ' 1-Fan 8" wheel capac¬ ity, 42,000 cu. ft. per min. 2 exhaust fans 4.8" drain. { Indirect natural draft- coils in basement. Halls have direct. { Indirect gold pin. Di¬ rect Bundy single cols, in halls and offices. { Bundy Columbia 2-col. W. iron pipe coils. Indirect No fans. ' West End. Indirect. No fans. - Center—Direct. East—Direct and Indi¬ rect for lecture room. { Direct to keep 50° at night. Indirect sys¬ tem for day time. { Indirect for lecture room. Direct for other parts. cu. ft. Dyn. Lab.__ 123,000 308,000 Sib.—West . 363,000 908,000 “ —Cent__ 346,000 - 965,000 “ —East__ 352,000 880,000 Sib. Shops, West. _ _ 234,000 608,000 Sib. Shops, East . _ 144,000 360,000 Foundry _ 96,000 240,000 Lincoln Hall 586,000 1,465,000 To’l for pres¬ ent build- ings_ 8,599,000 30,856,000 Goldwin Smith Hall Rockefeller Hall_ 'Direct—Mostly pipe coils. All direct. Direct wall coils. Indi’t to Draught, room Pipe coils. Pipe coils and a few radiators. Coils. { Direct except 4 small indirect stacks about 5 %. 3,000,000 H. 2,050,000 V. 3,000,000 H. 1,670,000 V. Total for buildings under construction__ 9,720,000 Total for present buildings_30,856,000 Total _ 40,576,000 B.T.U.’s