THE UNIYERSITY .Jv OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY The person charging this material is re¬ sponsible for its return on or before the Latest Date stamped below. Theft, mutilation, and underlinipo#'pf books are reasons for disciplincy^^^w^^nd may result in dismissai|rf^ln \heUniversity. Illinois Library CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON Publication No. 408 1930 THERMODYNAMIC RELATIONS IN MULTI-COMPONENT SYSTEMS BY ROY W. GORANSON Physicist, Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington Published by Carnegie Institution of Washington July, 1930 WASHINGTON TYPOGRAPHERS, INC. WASHINGTON, D. C. 5 3C,7 PREFACE A large part of the work at the Geophysical Laboratory consists of experimental thermodynamics. This means that we are con¬ tinually evaluating explicitly the thermodynamic relations which exist between the variables of particular systems, these variables including temperature, pressure, and amounts of the substances that determine their composition. It is therefore very desirable, and for this reason work was begun, to evaluate as many as possible of the relations existing between the variable quantities of multi- component systems in terms of quantities that can be readily obtained from experiment, and tabulate them in a compact and easily accessible form. In order to do this it was found necessary to make a skeleton outline of the whole structure of thermodynamics. Gibbs de¬ veloped this subject but his treatment was couched in the mathe¬ matical language of his day which had not then been developed as a tool for the physicist and consequently readers found difficulty in deciphering it. Later writers went to the other extreme in avoiding mathematical language as much as possible. Now state¬ ments by such writers must necessarily be incomplete or ambiguous for physics has progressed to such an extent that physicists find ordinary language too poor to express the precise delicate shades of meaning that are found to be necessary. Mathematics was there¬ fore developed to serve this purpose. Hence it was suggested that the outline that was constructed and used here should be completed very fully and made to serve as text for the tables. I am indebted to George Tunell of this Laboratory who is in a large measure responsible for the existence of the book by giving lavishly of his time and effort in constructing the framework of this thesis, and in particular for his work in chapters one to three. I also wish to thank P. W. Bridgman of Harvard University and L. H. Adams of this Laboratory for reading and criticizing the manuscript. V July, 1929. Geophysical Laboratory Washington, D. C. ROY W. GORANSON . • • . lloll r |1 ^H HI CONTENTS PAGE Preface .'. v Introductory . xi Nomenclature . xv CHAPTER I. FUNDAMENTAL IDEAS Undefined concepts or directly measurable quantities ART. 1. Length. 1 2. Time. 4 3. Mass. 6 4. Force. 8 5. Temperature. 9 6. General note regarding the physical quantities. 10 7. Property: extensive and intensive properties, state, homo¬ geneous AND HETEROGENEOUS SYSTEMS, EQUILIBRIUM STATE . . 12 r CHAPTER II. SIMPLE HOMOGENEOUS SYSTEMS Unit mass systems 8. Equation of state or characteristic equation. 14 9. Definitions of work and heat. 15 10. Reversible vs. irreversible processes. 16 11. Transformation of heat and work integrals. 17 12. Differentials and derivatives of heat and work. 18 13. Definitions of the heat capacities per unit mass. 20 14. The first law of thermodynamics. 22 15. Geometric interpretation of the first law. 22 16. The necessary and sufficient conditions for a line in¬ tegral, EXPRESSED AS THE ENERGY INTEGRAL, TO BE INDE¬ PENDENT OF THE PATH. 23 17. An analysis of some incomplete statements of the first LAW THAT HAVE BEEN USED. 28 18. The SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS. 31 19. Differential and partial derivatives of the entropy. 31 20. Relations between energy derivatives and heat capacities, BETWEEN ENTROPY DERIVATIVES AND HEAT CAPACITIES, AND BETWEEN DERIVATIVES OF HEAT CAPACITIES (ALL PER UNIT MASS). 33 vii Vlll CONTENTS art. CHAPTER II— Continued page Homogeneous one-component systems of variable mass 21. Definitions of component and phase. 35 22. Definitions of heat and work. 39 23. The first law of thermodynamics. 40 24. The second law of thermodynamics. 41 25. Definitions of Gibbs’ thermodynamic functions. 42 CHAPTER III. HOMOGENEOUS BINARY SYSTEMS OF VARIABLE MASS AND COMPOSITION 26. Definitions of specific volume and mass fraction. 43 27. Equation of state. 43 28. Definitions of work and heat. 44 29. Definitions of c p , 1 p , l mi — lm*. 45 30. Transformation of the heat and work integrals. 46 31. Definitions of c v , 1 v> lwi — lw 2 . 47 32. The first law of thermodynamics. 48 33. Transformation of the energy integral. 50 34. The second law of thermodynamics. 52 35. Transformation of the entropy integral. 54 36. Relations between unit mass and variable mass binary SYSTEMS. 55 CHAPTER IV. HOMOGENEOUS N-COMPONENT SYSTEMS 37. Definitions of specific volume and mass fraction. 57 38. Equation of state . 57 39. Definitions of work and heat. 58 40. Transformation of the heat integral. 59 41. The first law of thermodynamics . 60 42. Transformation of the energy integral. 62 43. The second law of thermodynamics. 64 44. Transformation of the entropy integral . 66 45. Derivation of Gibbs’ equation 12. 68 46. Definitions of Gibbs’ thermodynamic functions. 70 47. Differential and partial derivatives of Gibbs’ Zeta. 70 48. Differential and partial derivatives of enthalphy or Gibbs’ Chi . 72 49. Differential and partial derivatives of Gibbs’ Psi . 73 50. Derivation of Gibbs’ equation 97. 74 CHAPTER V. STRAIN 51. Definition of strain . 76 52. Strain transformations. 78 CONTENTS IX art. CHAPTER V — Continued page 53. The functions associated with strain. 80 54. A PHYSICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTITIES ei, e2, e 3 . 81 55. The angle between two curves altered by strain. A PHYSICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTITIES e4, 65, e6. 82 56. Linear dilatation at a point of the system. 84 57. Homogeneous strain. 85 58. Pure strain. 87 59. Strain tangent at a point. 90 60. Very small deformations. 91 61. Conditions of compatibility for strain-components. 92 CHAPTER VI. STRESS 62. Concept of stress. 95 63. Interior and exterior forces. Six necessary conditions FOR EQUILIBRIUM OF A RIGID BODY. 97 64. Equations of equilibrium. 99 65. Specification of stress at a point. 101 CHAPTER VII. THERMODYNAMIC TREATMENT OF SYSTEMS HOMOGENEOUSLY STRAINED 66. Definitions of work and heat. 107 67. Definition of c x , 1 X1 , . . , 1 X6 . 109 68. Transformation of the heat and work integrals. 109 69. The first law of thermodynamics . Ill 70. Transformation of the energy integral. 112 71. The second law of thermodynamics. 113 72. Transformation of the entropy integral. 114 73. Derivation of Gibbs’ equation 12 for strained systems. ... 115 74. Differential and partial derivatives of Gibbs’ Zeta. 116 75. Differential and partial derivatives of enthalpy or Gibbs’Chi. 117 76. Differential and partial derivatives of Gibbs’ Psi. 118 CHAPTER VIII. THE STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONS FOR ISOTHERMAL CHANGES OF STATE 77. Generalized Hooke’s Law of the proportionality of stress AND STRAIN. 120 78. “Strain-energy function” for isothermal changes of STATE. 120 79. “Strain-energy function” for adiabatic changes of state . 121 80. Static vs. dynamic methods of determining the stress- strain RELATIONS. RELATION BETWEEN WORK FOR ISOTHER¬ MAL AND WORK FOR ADIABATIC CHANGES OF STATE. 122 X CONTENTS art. CHAPTER VIII—Continued page 81. The elastic coefficients or “elastic constants” of the SYSTEM. 122 82. The stress-strain relations for isotropic bodies. 123 83. Moduli OF ELASTICITY FOR ISOTROPIC SUBSTANCES. 125 84. Anisotropic character of homogeneous crystalline sub¬ stances . 127 85. Transformations of the strain-energy function. 130 86. Moduli of elasticity for anisotropic homogeneous sub¬ stances . 132 CHAPTER IX. SYSTEMS NOT IN EQUILIBRIUM. IRREVERSIBLE PROCESSES 87. Displacement transformations. 134 88. Definitions of work and heat received. 136 89. The first law of thermodynamics. 137 90. The second law of thermodynamics. 138 91. Relations of non-homogeneous to homogeneous systems ... 139 92. “Reversible processes”. 142 93. Justification for defining the entropy and energy of a SIMPLE SUBSTANCE AT SOME ARBITRARY STATE AS ZERO . 143 CHAPTER X. INTRODUCTION TO THE TABLES OF THERMODYNAMIC RELATIONS 94. The variable properties or quantities of the tables and THEIR RELATIONS .,. 146 95. The standard derivatives for Table 1. 148 96. Transformations of standard derivatives of Table I to FUNDAMENTAL DERIVATIVES . 149 97. Abbreviations and special notation introduced in the TABLES . 149 98. Transformations necessary to convert the tables for VARIABLE MASS SYSTEMS TO TABLES FOR UNIT MASS SYSTEMS .... 151 99. Experimental determination of the standard derivatives. 152 100. Fundamental equation for a binary system of variable mass. 155 101. Electromotive force measurements. 159 102. The second derivatives (Table II). 161 Part 2 Key to Tables. 167 Table I. First derivatives. 170 Table II. Second derivatives. 263 Appendix. Dilute solution laws; ideal solutions; definitions OF FUGACITY AND ACTIVITY . 319 Index. 327 INTRODUCTORY The science of thermodynamics deals with work and heat. Since all physical and chemical processes, which thereby include all natural phenomena, involve work and heat, it is apparent that thermodynamics is a fundamental and far-reaching science. It was therefore thought desirable to have as many thermo¬ dynamic relations as possible in multi-component systems readily available, especially since a large part of the work done at the Geophysical Laboratory consists of experimental thermodynamics. This idea grew out of a study of the condensed collection of thermo¬ dynamic formulas derived by Professor Bridgman 1 for one-com¬ ponent systems of one and two phases and constant mass (the three phase one-component system not being variable). Bridgman also indicates the extension of his tables to more complex cases of one- component systems in which electrical forces, surface tension, and other forces are present in addition to hydrostatic pressure. r Bridgman’s tables refer to systems of constant mass, but it is well known that all of the functions for the one-component system of variable mass may be computed from the unit mass functions. It is proved herein that the variable mass functions for multi- component systems may also be readily computed from the unit mass functions alone without the necessity of any additional experimental measurements. For the purposes of experimental thermodynamics it is highly desirable if not essential that the quantities necessary to be directly measured in order to formulate a fundamental equation be known. Bridgman has already stated the quantities necessary to be meas¬ ured for formulating the fundamental equation for the one-com¬ ponent single phase system. I have done this for the multi- component systems in my introduction to the tables. How complete it is desired to make a mathematical treatment, i. e., of what length to make the steps between the equations, 1 P. W. Bridgman, A Condensed Collection of Thermodynamic Formulas (Harvard University Press), 1925. xi Xll INTRODUCTORY depends both on the use to which it is to be put and upon the mathematical facility and intuition of the user. For example, in publishing his papers on Heterogeneous Equilibria, Gibbs omitted so many of the intervening steps between his equations that many of his readers have found difficulty in following his development of the subject. For this reason it was suggested that the derivations given here be treated very fully and completely. Thermodynamics begins with certain undefined physical con¬ cepts (directly measurable quantities) and certain unproved hypothetical relations between them (physical hypotheses). All of the other concepts (variable quantities) of the science are defined in terms of the initial undefined concepts and all of the theorems of the science are deduced from the definitions and the initial physical hypotheses. 1 The physical hypotheses of thermodynamics can of course be stated in words without the use of mathematical symbols. In order to deduce theorems from the physical hypotheses it is necessary to express the hypotheses symbolically by means of mathematical equations. Furthermore they can be stated with the same clarity and much more briefly by means of the mathe¬ matical equations of partial derivatives and line integrals. On this point Poincare 2 says: “All laws are deduced from experiment; but to enumerate them, a special language is needful; ordinary language is too poor, it is besides too vague, to express relations so delicate, so rich, and so precise. This therefore is one reason why the physicist can not do without mathematics; it furnishes him the only language he can speak.” In most of the problems independent variables of two orders are present and for dealing with independent variables of two orders 3 the methods of partial derivatives and line integrals were especially designed. As Professor W. F. Osgood has said, “In thermodynamics a thoroughgoing appreciation of what the independent variables are (in order that, when the letters expressing the variables of the two classes overlap the meaning of 1 See Warren Weaver, American Math. Monthly 36, 1929, p. 39. 2 H. Poincare, The Foundations of Science, 1921, p. 281. 3 This is the terminology used by W. F. Osgood, Advanced Calculus, 1925, pp. 115, 140. Another phraseology used by mathematicians is “functions of functions.” INTRODUCTORY Xlll the partial derivatives may be clear) and the ability to think in terms of line integrals, are indispensable.” While this treatment is an attempt to begin with the undefined concepts, definitions and physical hypotheses and from them develop the subject in a mathematically rigorous manner, mathe¬ matical rigor has not been pursued for its own sake. On the broad subject of the relationships between physics and mathematics Courant 1 has written: “From time immemorial mathematics has derived powerful impulses from the close relationships which exist between the problems and methods of analysis and the perceptual concepts of physics. For the first time in the last decade a crumbling away of this connection has taken place in that mathematical investigation in many cases cut loose from its perceptual starting points and especially in analysis often concerned itself all too exclusively with refinement of its methods and sharpening of its concepts. Many students of analysis have thus lost a full knowledge of the close connection of their science with physics and other subjects while on the other hand the physicists have lost the understanding of the problems and methods of the mathematicians, in fact even of the mathematicians’ entire sphere of interest and language. Without doubt in this tendency lies an important threat for science; the current of scientific development is in danger of seeping out further and further to ooze away and dry up. If it shall avoid this fate we must direct a good part of our forces toward again uniting the separated parts in developing clearly by means of collective points of view the internal connections of multi¬ farious facts. Only thus will a real mastery of the materials be possible for the student and the ground be prepared for the in¬ vestigator leading to a further organic development.” In any case the question is merely whether rigorous mathematics constitutes a more useful tool than “non-rigorous” mathematics and this question probably can not be answered from a 'priori consider¬ ations. At the same time the term “non-rigorous” can only mean incomplete or incorrect. The degree of completeness desirable is 1 Author’s translation from the Preface of Methoden der Mathematischen Physik I, R. Courant und D. Hilbert, Julius Springer, Berlin, 1924. XIV INTRODUCTORY of course a matter of judgment. As to the second interpretation of the term “non-rigorous,” while the whole question must of course be left to the empirical test, it is hard to see how incorrect mathematics could be more useful than correct mathematics. Of course no physical treatment can be more accurate than the initial hypotheses. Hence no treatment of science can be made rigorously accurate. For example, all physical hypotheses and definitions in this treatment presuppose that our physical opera¬ tions on systems are carried out on a certain scale. It is believed that all matter can be subdivided into electrons and protons. Now suppose that we are able to observe and wish to treat the behavior of these electrons and protons in a system. All we can say is that this treatment does not apply to such dynamic systems since the variables used in this treatment would not uniquely define the internal conditions of such a system. We therefore definitely limit ourselves to systems composed of such a large aggregate of these electrons and protons that when any such system is con¬ sidered as a whole, for we do not concern ourselves with the in¬ ternal condition of the system, the state of this system is uniquely determined by the set of operations we limit ourselves to, which is, for any one system, the characteristic equation or equation of state we set down for it. As a resume, it may be stated that the following have been the principal aims of this treatment: (1) Assuming the above limitations of the subject, to begin with the undefined concepts and physical assumptions and present the science of classical thermodynamics in a logical and mathe¬ matically rigorous manner. (2) To fill in the gaps existing in the present literature by de¬ ducing the theorems necessary for this development. (3) To evaluate the mathematical functions in terms of directly measurable quantities. (4) To compute the mathematical relationships obtainable be¬ tween the variables. NOMENCLATURE t 6 V m k m k v V £ e n V ( = e + pv- 6 { = e + p v — 6 2C = e + V v X = e + V v ijr = £ — 6 n \p = e — 6 rj W and W Q and Q temperature in degrees on the Centigrade scale, temperature in degrees on the absolute ther¬ modynamic scale. pressure in dynes per square centimeter or baryes. mass in grams of component k. mass fraction of component k, =-• mk , - mi + • • • +m n total volume in cubic centimeters, specific volume, volume per unit mass, in cubic centimeters per gram, total internal energy in dyne centimeters internal energy per unit mass in dyne centi¬ meters per gram. total entropy in dyne centimeters per degree, entropy per unit mass in dyne centimeters per degree per gram. n total zeta (Lewis’ free energy F) in dyne centimeters. rj zeta per unit mass in dyne centimeters per gram. total enthalphy or chi in dyne centimeters enthalpy per unit mass in dyne centimeters per gram. total psi in dyne centimeters psi per unit mass in dyne centimeters per gram, total work and work per unit mass respective¬ ly, received by the system in dyne centi¬ meters and dyne centimeters per gram, total heat and heat per unit mass respectively, received by the system in dyne centimeters and dyne centimeters per gram. XV XVI NOMENCLATURE h = -8 if) \Ol/ p,mi, m n C v C p -f~ Ip ^ ^ t, mi, m n ‘'Mk ^Wk Irak "l - Ip dp ,5m Mk P E q c <7 (x, y, z), (£, 7?, r) U, V, w Cl, . . . , Gq X, Y, Z X ! = X x X 2 = Yy X 3 = Z z X 4 = Z y = Y z x 5 = x z = z x X 6 = 7 X = X y c x u. k/2, », mi heat capacity per unit mass at constant pressure and concentration, latent heat of change of pressure per unit mass at constant temperature and con¬ centration, heat capacity per unit mass at constant Vt . .m n volume and concentration. latent heat of change of volume per unit mass at constant temperature and concentration, “reversible” heat of change of mass of com¬ ponent k where temperature, pressure, and the other component masses are constant, reversible” heat of change of mass of component k where temperature, vol¬ ume, and the other component masses are constant. “chemical potential” of component k in the phase. a parameter; used as curve or path, or time, density electromotive force quantity of electricity velocity of light acceleration of gravity coordinates projections of displacement vectors on the x, y, z axes respectively, strain components, (see sections 53, 60) projections of body force vectors on the x, y, z, axes respectively Stress components (e. g. Z y = traction along the z-axis across the y-plane). Considered positive when they are tensions and negative when pressures, (section 65) heat capacity per unit volume at constant stress. NOMENCLATURE XVII c e heat capacity per unit volume at constant strain. latent heat of change of stress parallel to the dd Jx x-axis per unit volume where temperature and the other stresses are constant. Similarly for l Xl , i = 2, ..., 6 dXA Latent heat of change of strain along the dei / t , e2 .e 6 x-axis per unit volume where tempera¬ ture and the other strains are constant. Similarly for l ei , i = 2, . . ., 6 dh, (i, h) 1, . . ., 6 “Elastic constants” (section 81). K Bulk modulus or modulus of compression compressibility E a R A e t (t, p, mi) Young’s modulus Poisson’s ratio modulus of rigidity cubical dilatation (section 86) is a notation for Tables I and II — m a denotes all the component masses, i.e. mi, • • •, m n ; mi all except m k ; mj all except m h ; m g all except m k and m h ; m b all except m k , m h and m y . Table II —Subscripts: e = e; n = n; x = y = z = C. ' . THERMODYNAMIC RELATIONS IN MULTI-COMPONENT SYSTEMS By Roy W. Goranson PART I CHAPTER I Fundamental Ideas UNDEFINED CONCEPTS OR DIRECTLY MEASURABLE QUANTITIES Let us begin our inquiry by considering what the undefined concepts or directly measurable quantities of thermodynamics are. We take them to be: length, time, mass, force, and temperature. The point of view adopted here in considering the physical concepts is that of Bridgman . 1 In treating these physical concepts there is no intent here to make the investigation an exhaustive one since that is not possible in a work of this size. However, the analysis of any theory must begin with such a treatment since these concepts are the starting point and hence an integral part of the theory. r 1. Length: Bridgman says: “Our task is to find the operations by which we measure the length of any concrete physical object. We begin with objects of our commonest experience, such as a house or a house lot. What we do is sufficiently indicated by the following rough description. We start with a measuring rod, lay it on the object so that one of its ends coincides with one end of the object, mark on the object the position of the other end of the rod, then move the rod along in a straight line extension of its previous position until the first end coincides with the previous position of the second end, repeat this process as often as we can, and call the length the total number of times the rod was applied. This procedure, apparently so simple, is in practice exceedingly com¬ plicated, and doubtless a full description of all the precautions that must be taken would fill a large treatise. We must, for example, be sure that the temperature of the rod is the standard temperature at w T hich its length is defined, or else we must make a 1 P. W. Bridgman, The Logic of Modern Physics (Macmillan, New York), 1927 . 1 2 THERMODYNAMICS §1 correction for it; or we must correct for the gravitational distortion of the rod if we measure a vertical length; or we must be sure that the rod is not a magnet or is not subject to electrical forces. . . . Practically of course precautions such as these are not mentioned, but the justification is in our experience that vari¬ ations or procedure of this kind are without effect on the final result. But we always have to recognize that all our experience is subject to error, and that at some time in the future we may have to specify more carefully the acceleration, for example, of the rod in moving from one position to another if experimental accuracy should be so increased as to show a measurable effect. In principle the operations by which length is measured should be uniquely specified. . .” sf: Hs “We . . . are also compelled to modify our procedures when we go to small distances. Down to the scale of microscopic dimen¬ sions a fairly straightforward extension of the ordinary measuring procedure is sufficient, as when we measure a length in a microm¬ eter eyepiece of a microscope. This is of course a combination of tactual and optical measurements, and certain assumptions, justified as far as possible by experience, have to be made about the behavior of light beams. These assumptions are of a quite different character from those which give us concern on the as¬ tronomical scale, because here we meet difficulty from interference effects due to the finite scale of the structure of light, and are not concerned with a possible curvature of light beams in the long reaches of space. Apart from the matter of convenience, we might also measure small distances by the tactual method. “As the dimensions become smaller, certain difficulties become increasingly important that were negligible on a larger scale. In carrying out physically the operations equivalent to our concepts, there are a host of practical precautions to be taken which could be explicitly enumerated with difficulty, but of which nevertheless any practical physicist is conscious. Suppose, for example, we measure length tactually by a combination of Johanssen gauges. In piling these together, we must be sure that they are clean, and FUNDAMENTAL IDEAS 3 § 1 are thus in actual contact. Particles of mechanical dirt first engage our attention. Then as we go to smaller dimensions we perhaps have to pay attention to adsorbed films of moisture, then at still smaller dimensions to adsorbed films of gas, until finally we have to work in a vacuum, which must be the more nearly complete the smaller the dimensions. About the time that we discover the necessity for a complete vacuum, we discover that the gauges themselves are atomic in structure, that they have no definite boundaries, and therefore no definite length, but the length is a hazy thing, varying rapidly in time between certain limits. We treat this situation as best we can by taking a time average of the apparent positions of the boundaries, assuming that along with the decrease of dimensions we have acquired a cor¬ responding extravagant increase in nimbleness. But as the dimen¬ sions get smaller continually, the difficulties due to this haziness increase indefinitely in percentage effect, and we are eventually driven to give up altogether. We have made the discovery that there are essential physical limitations to the operations which defined the concept of length. ... At the same time that we have r come to the end of our rope with our Johanssen gauge procedure, our companion with the microscope has been encountering diffi¬ culties due to the finite wave length of light; this difficulty he has been able to minimize by using light of progressively shorter wave lengths, but he has eventually had to stop on reaching X-rays. Of course this optical procedure with the microscope is more convenient and is therefore adopted in practice.” When using more than one operation we must so choose them that they give, within the experimental error, the same numerical results in the domain in which the two sets of operations may be both applied; but we must recognize in principle that in changing the operations we have really changed the concept and that to use the same name for these different concepts over the entire range is dictated only by considerations of convenience. We must therefore always be prepared some day to find that an increase in experimental accuracy may show that the two sets of operations which give the same results in the more ordinary part of the domain of experience lead to measurably different results in the more 4 THERMODYNAMICS §2 unfamiliar parts of the domain and thus must keep aware of the joints in our conceptual structure if we hope to render unnecessary the services of the unborn Einsteins. We choose as our concept the tactual and assume that the optical operation gives identical results. This is verified by our past experience but must remain subject to the possible modi¬ fication stated above. The concept of volume is an extension of that of length. The concept arises from the fundamental sensations in which all geometrical notions are founded. If we are in a room the presence of rigid bodies, as furniture, may prevent us from moving our limbs in certain ways and as a natural consequence we might say that the rigid bodies which prevent certain motions occupy space corresponding to the motions which they render impossible and which may be called motor space . 1 Further, before the estab¬ lishing of a quantitative method of measurement, we conclude from our vague senses that the amount of muscular motion excluded by a body indicates its volume. To obtain the general notion of a difference between different positions in space that does not depend upon their occupation by one material system rather than another and to find means of measuring magnitudes to replace the vague and subjective mus¬ cular sensations, a system of coordinates must be introduced. We accept as a fact that to every position in space defined by muscular motion there corresponds (if the system of coordinates is rightly chosen) one and only one set of coordinates. 2. Time: All ideas of time depend on the immediate judg¬ ments of “before,” “after,” and “simultaneous with” at the place of the observer. These relations are such that events can be arranged in a numerical order and thus physical judgments can be rendered in respect of time. The measurement of “time” is effected by means of periods which are properties of systems or individual bodies. The reali- 1 Poincare says if there were no solid bodies in nature there would be no geometry. §2 FUNDAMENTAL IDEAS 5 zation of a standard series is obtained by the use of isoperiodic systems, namely such as are characterized by a series of events A, B, C, D, which may be as long as we please, the periods AB, BC, CD, . . . being all equal as tested against some other period. Accordingly in such systems the periods AB, AC, AD provide the integral members of the standard series. The fractional members are provided by other isoperiodic systems, one event of these periods being made simultaneous with a member of the integral series. Pendulums and clocks are examples of isoperiodic systems. (For our limited purposes the ultimate isoperiodic system pro¬ viding an unending series of events is the rotating Earth.) With the standard system of periods established, it is then pos¬ sible to measure magnitudes, called time-intervals. The concept of time is determined by the operations by which it is measured, but the physical operations at the basis of the measurement of time have never been subjected to the critical examination which seems to be required. We might seek to specify the measurement of time in purely mechanical terms, as for in¬ stance in terms of the vibration of a tuning fork, or the rotation of r a flywheel. But here we encounter difficulties. As Bridgman says, “We want to use the clock as a physical instrument in determining the laws of mechanics, which of course are not determined until we can measure time, and we find that the laws of mechanics enter into the operation of the clock. “The dilemma which confronts us here is not an impossible one, and is in fact of the same nature as that which confronted the first physicist who had to discover simultaneously the approximate laws of mechanics and geometry with a string which stretched when he pulled it. We must first guess at what the laws are ap¬ proximately, then design an experiment so that, in accordance wdth this guess, the effect of motion on some phenomenon is much greater than the expected effect on the clock, then from measure¬ ments with uncorrected clock time find an approximate expression for the effect of motion on mass or length, with which we correct the clock, and so on ad infinitum. However, so far as I know, the possibility of such a procedure has not been analyzed, and until the analysis is given, our complacency is troubled by a real dis- THERMODYNAMICS 6 quietude, the intensity of which depends on the natural skepticism of our temperament. * * * “This discussion of the concept of time will doubtless be felt by some to be superficial in that it makes no mention of the properties of the physical time to which the concept is designed to apply. For instance, we do not discuss the one dimensional flow of time, or the irrevocability of the past. Such a discussion, however, is beyond our present purpose, and would take us deeper than I feel competent to go, and perhaps beyond the verge of meaning itself. Our discussion here is from the point of view of operations: we assume the operations to be given, and do not attempt to ask why precisely these operations were chosen, or whether others might not be more suitable. Such properties of time as its irrevoca¬ bility are implicitly contained in the operations themselves, and the physical essence of time is buried in that long physical ex¬ perience that taught us what operations are adapted to describing and correlating nature. We may digress, however, to consider one question. It is quite common to talk about a reversal of the direction of flow of time. Particularly, for example, in discussing the equations of mechanics, it is shown that if the direction of flow of time is reversed, the whole history of the system is retraced. The statement is sometimes added that such a reversal is actually impossible, because it is one of the properties of physical time to flow always forward. If this last statement is subjected to an operational analysis, I believe that it will be found not to be a statement about nature at all, but merely a statement about operations. It is meaningless to talk about time moving backward: by definition, forward is the direction in which time flows.” 1 3. Mass: The notion of mass is also sufficiently familiar, pro¬ vided we take it just as it comes, in its naive original form. We may try to convey the idea by saying that mass is the quantity of matter which a body contains, but this is not a defi¬ nition of mass; it is merely a statement of the concept in different words. 1 P. W. Bridgman, The Logic of Modern Physics, pp. 71, 78-79. §3 FUNDAMENTAL IDEAS 7 We agree that the unit of mass shall be the mass of a standard platinum-iridium cylinder known as the International Prototype kilogram. Measuring the mass of a body consists in comparing its mass with that of the standard cylinder. In order that this might be done conveniently, it was first necessary to construct bodies of the same mass as that of the standard cylinder, and then to make a whole series of bodies whose masses were 1/2, 1/10, 1/100, 1/1000, etc., of the standard mass; in other words to construct a set of standard masses. This we are able to do quite easily since the mass of a compound body formed by uniting two or more bodies is, by the nature of the concept, equal to the sum of the masses of the separate bodies. Thus two equal masses which are together equal to the standard unit mass will each be one-half the mass of the unit; four equal masses which together are equal to the standard unit mass will each be one-quarter of the mass of the unit; and so on. With the aid of such a set of standard masses the determination of the mass of any unknown body is made by first placing the body upon one pan of a balance and counterpoising with shot, paper, etc., and then replacing the unknown body by as many of the standard masses as are required to bring the pointer back to zero again. The mass of the body is equal to the sum of these standard masses. 1 We have assumed that the gravitational field of the earth acts equally on equal masses. For our purposes this method of de¬ termination of mass is sufficient. If we, however, go to high velocities and to extended space we are in difficulties since we do not know whether the force of gravity is independent of velocity at high velocities. Here the concepts of force and mass lose their definiteness and become partially fused since there are no oper¬ ations by which force can be obtained as a function of velocity without knowing the mass or any operation by which mass can be measured without knowing the force. 1 This method of determination of mass is called the method of substitu¬ tion. See R. A. Millikan and H. G. Gale, A First Course in Physics, 1913, 8 THERMODYNAMICS §4 4. Force: The idea of force is also familiar in the form of a push or pull. 1 To find how hard we are pulling when we hold a kite string it is only necessary to tie a spring balance to the end of the string and note how far the spring is stretched. The unit of force is perfectly arbitrary, being simply the force which causes any agreed-upon amount of stretch in a standard spring; and a complete scale of multiples and submultiples of the unit is readily established by simply opposing one or more un-, marked springs, in various combinations, against the standard, or unit, spring, and marking the positions reached by the pointers. 2 By means of a portable, graduated spring balance thus con¬ structed we are able theoretically to measure forces for systems in equilibrium in terms of the arbitrarily chosen unit of force repre¬ sented by our originally chosen standard spring. “We next extend the force concept to systems not in equilibrium, in which there are accelerations, and we must conceive that at first all our experiments are made in an isolated laboratory far out in empty space, where there is no gravitational field. We here encounter a new concept, that of mass, which as it is originally met is en¬ tangled with the force concept, but may later be disentangled by a process of successive approximations. The details of the various steps in the process of approximation are very instructive as typical of all methods in physics, but need not be elaborated here. Suffice it to say that we are eventually able to give to each rigid material body a numerical tag characteristic of the body, such that the product of this number and the acceleration it receives under the action of any given force applied to it by a spring balance is numerically equal to the force, the force being defined, except for a correction, in terms of the deformation of the balance, exactly as it was in the static case. In particular, the relation found between mass, force, and acceleration applies to the spring balance itself by which the force is applied, so that a correction has to be applied for a diminution of the force exerted by the balance arising from its own acceleration. 1 W. F. Osgood, Introduction to the Calculus, 1922, p. 348. 2 This process involves no knowledge of Hooke’s Law; it merely assumes that the elastic properties of the spring do not vary with the time. §5 FUNDAMENTAL IDEAS 9 “We now extend the scope of our measurements by bringing our laboratory into the gravitational field of the earth, and immediately our experience is extended, in that we continually see bodies accelerated with no spring balance (that is, no force) acting on them. We extend the concept of force, and say that any body accelerated is acted on by a force, and the magnitude of this force is defined as that which would have been necessary to produce in the same body the same acceleration with a spring balance in empty space. There is physical justification for this extension in that we find we can remove the acceleration which a body acquires in a gravitational field by exerting on it with a spring balance a force of exactly the specified amount in the opposite direction.” 1 In extending the notion of force to systems not in equilibrium (moving in force fields) we have changed the character of the concept—the force acting on the body is now measured in terms of mass-acceleration. The hypothesis is made that these two operations measure the same thing. 5. Temperature: The concept “which sets thermodynamics off apart from the simple subjects is probably that of temperature. In origin this concept was without question physiological in much the same way as the mechanical concept of force was physiological. But just as the force concept was made more precise, so the tem¬ perature concept may be more or less divorced from its crude significance in terms of immediate sensation and be given a more precise meaning. This precision may be obtained through the notion of equilibrium states.” 2 The idea of temperature is obtained from our sensation of how hot or how cold a body is. By touching a number of bodies with the hand, we can arrange them roughly in order, from the coldest to the hottest. Such an order, however, is likely to be modified by a second series of observations. By touching the bodies with a glass tube enlarged at the bottom and partly filled with mercury, and determining the place of any body in the series according to 1 P. W. Bridgman, The Logic of Modern Physics, pp. 102-103. 2 P. W. Bridgman, op. cit., pp. 117, 118. 10 THERMODYNAMICS §6 the amount by which the level of the mercury rises when the tube is placed in contact with it, we secure an order which is modified only in the cases of a few bodies when a second series of obser¬ vations is made. If, finally, we use an apparatus which we call a hydrogen gas thermometer, we can repeat the observations many times for all the bodies, each of which is kept under constant conditions, without finding it necessary to change the order. The reading of this hydrogen gas thermometer, when placed in contact with a body, we agree to take as the temperature of the body. This will be true only if the mass of the thermometer is infinitely small compared with the masses of the bodies whose temperatures we are measuring. We find that the temperature reading will depend on the relative masses of the systems measured and the thermometer, and on the kind of material used as container for the hydrogen gas. Thus, since in actual practice the thermometer must be of finite size with respect to the system measured, suitable corrections must be made for the mass of the thermometer and kind of material used in its construction. By means of this thermometer we can measure temperature just as we can measure force by means of the spring balance. Our concept is that the reading of this thermometer corresponds to a physical quantity. 1 6. General Note regarding the physical quantities: Among the reasons which justify the introduction of the quantities enumer¬ ated as physical quantities is the empirical observation of certain rather obvious relations. In the case of temperature the first of these relations is as follows: Let A, B and C be three bodies. If A undergoes no change of 1 For purposes of thermodynamics as we have limited them temperature can certainly not be defined in terms of flow of heat. Thus the statement by G. N. Lewis and M. Randall on page 57 of “Thermodynamics and the free Energy of Chemical Substances,” for example, that “if there can be no thermal flow from one body to another, the two bodies are at the same temperature; but if one can lose energy to the other by thermal flow, the temperature of the former is the greater” would be incorrect as a definition of temperature. On this subject P. W. Bridgman, Logic of Modern Physics, p. 125, says: “The essential fact that a quantity of heat can by itself be defined only in terms of a drop of temperature is somewhat obscured by the usual method of thermodynamic analysis.” §6 FUNDAMENTAL IDEAS 11 volume on being placed in contact with B and if further B under¬ goes no change of volume on being placed in contact with C, then it is a matter of experience that A will undergo no change of volume on being placed in contact with C. (Thus if A and B are in thermal equilibrium, and B and C are in thermal equilibrium, then A and C are in thermal equilibrium.) The other relation is: If the volume of A decreases and that of B increases when they are placed in contact, if further the volume of B decreases and the volume of C increases when they are placed in contact, then we usually find that the volume of A will decrease and that of C will increase if they are placed in contact. (Thus if the temperature of A is greater than that of B and the temperature of B is greater than that of C then the temperature of A is greater than that of C.) In the case of force analogous relations are observed. Let A, B and C be three spring balances each with a pointer attached to the spring. If A is extended until its pointer is opposite an arbi¬ trary notch on its frame when opposed by B and a notch is then cut opposite the pointer of B on its frame, if further B is extended until its pointer is opposite the notch on its frame when opposed by C and a notch is then cut opposite the pointer of C on its frame, then it is found that if A is extended until its pointer is opposite the notch on its frame when opposed by C the pointer of C will be opposite the notch on its frame. A statement regarding inequalities analogous to that made in the case of temperature could also be made in the case of force. Similarly for the other physical quantities. These, then, are our fundamental quantities: length, as measured by a meter bar; time, by a chronometer; mass, by a balance; force, by a spring balance; and temperature, as measured by a hydrogen gas thermometer. Thermodynamics, like the other branches of physics, deals with two kinds of quantities: those directly measurable experimentally 1 and those which are defined in terms of the directly measurable quantities by means of mathematical equations. In addition to the equations of definition of the quantities not directly measurable two other kinds of relations are present in the subject. We assume 1 Called undefined concepts. 12 THERMODYNAMICS §7 certain equations between various quantities of the two classes to be true as physical hypotheses: our knowledge of the truth of these equations may be directly or indirectly obtained from ex¬ periment; they can not, however, be derived mathematically from any relations previously obtained by definition and physical hypothesis. Lastly we have equations derived mathematically from equations already obtained by definition or physical hypo¬ thesis. According to Bridgman equations derived mathematically are never definitely known to be true physically until they are proved so experimentally. Poincare reaches the same conclusion and adds that the function of mathematics is not to produce new truth from old physical truth but to suggest new significant experiments. Moreover the mathematically derived consequences of a physical hypothesis may be useful in testing the hypothesis in case the hypothesis can not be verified directly by experiment. If the mathematically derived consequences are found to be true ex¬ perimentally we conclude that the probability that the hypothesis is also true is thereby increased. 1 The directly measurable quantities were first known quali- tativety and roughly quantitatively by physical methods. They are accurately defined qualitatively and quantitatively, as stated by Bridgman, in terms of physical operations. 7. Property : 2 By stating the properties of a system we describe its condition at a given instant. When a piece of steel is subjected to mechanical treatment its final volume is a property of the steel at the end of the process. These properties are either length, force, temperature, or mass, or quantities expressed in terms of the fundamental four quantities. Properties can be divided into two classes. The mass or volume of two identical systems, say two kilogram weights of brass or two exactly similar balloons of hydrogen, is double that of each one. 1 F. C. S. Schiller (Studies in the History and Method of Science, Edited by Charles Singer, Clarendon Press, 1917, p. 268) states that the logicians have pointed out for 2000 3 'ears that this involves a breach of formal logic. Schiller agrees that it does but concludes not that this fundamental method of science is wrong but rather that formal logic is worse than useless in science. 2 G. N. Lewis and M. Randall, Thermodynamics, 1923, pp. 12, 13. §7 FUNDAMENTAL IDEAS 13 Such properties are called extensive. The temperature of the two identical objects, on the other hand, is the same as that of either one. Properties of this kind are called intensive. Intensive properties are in many cases derived from the extensive properties. Thus while mass and volume are both extensive, the density and specific volume are intensive properties. STATE 1 In thermodynamic considerations we sav that the state of a •» ** system is given when all of its intensive properties are fixed. In thermodynamics we first consider systems in which the m •» properties vary continuously from point to point. A system, the properties of which are the same at all points, we define, following Gibbs,- as a homogeneous system. A heterogeneous system is defined as one consisting of two or more homogeneous parts. EQUILIBRIUM STATE If the properties of a system undergo no change after the lapse of a period of time, no matter how greatly it is extended, the system is said to be in a state of equilibrium. Properties here refer to the external conditions of the system. If we were to examine the internal conditions of, say, a gas on a small enough scale we would then observe inhomogeneities re¬ sulting from Brownian movement and other phenomena. All that we are concerned with, however, is that, for an equilibrium state, all such interactions in the system will be subject to the condition that the external properties remain constant as measured by our scale of operations. Our first physical hypothesis is that a homogeneous system is in an equilibrium state. 5 : G. X. Lewis and M. Randall, op. cit., p. 12. : The Collected Works of J. Willard Gibbs. YoL 1, p. 63. •' The assumption that one of the conditions for the state of a homogeneous system to be a state of equilibrium is that the pressure be the same at all points :s identical with one of the postulates of statics. CHAPTER II Simple homogeneous systems UNIT MASS SYSTEMS In thermodynamics we consider first simple homogeneous systems in which the composition, density, and temperature are the same at all points, and which are subject to a pressure which is the same at all points and which is the same in all directions at any given point. 8. Equation of State or characteristic equation: The specific volume of a system of this type is defined as the total volume divided by the total mass, v v = — m We assume as a physical hypothesis that when any two of the properties pressure, specific volume, and temperature of a par¬ ticular sj^stem are given, the third is determined, or that 9 (P, v, t) = 0, where p denotes the pressure in dynes per square centimeter, v the specific volume in cubic centimeters per gram, and t the temper¬ ature in centigrade degrees on the scale of the hydrogen gas thermometer. Each pair of values of the two properties which can be varied independently may be represented by a point in a Cartesian co¬ ordinate plane, the abscissa and ordinate of which are proportional to the values of the properties. Thus we may “say” that each point represents a state of the system. A series of states in which the properties vary continuously may be spoken of as a continuous series of states and may be represented geometrically by a continuous curve in the coordinate plane. A hypothetical “reversible process” of expansion is then a 14 §9 SIMPLE HOMOGENEOUS SYSTEMS 15 continuous series of equilibrium states which can be represented by a continuous curve in the ( t , p) coordinate plane or analytically by the equation t = f(p). Following the usage of Gibbs, 1 “For the sake of brevity it will be convenient to use language which at¬ tributes to the diagram properties which belong to the associated states of the body. Thus it can give rise to no ambiguity, if we speak of the volume or temperature of a point in the diagram instead of the volume or temperature of the body in the state associated with the point. ... In like manner also we may speak of the body moving along a line in the diagram, instead of passing through the series of states represented by the line.” 9. Definitions of work and heat: Let us take as the two inde¬ pendent variables t and p, and let us represent t by the ordinate and p by the abscissa of a point in a Cartesian coordinate plane. Then the work received by the system during the “reversible” expansion, i.e. in passing through a series of states represented by points of the continuous curve or simply work of the path, 2 W, in ergs per gram is defined geometrically as the area of the cylinder erected on the curve or analytically as the line integral, 3 t, V f dv At i A -J v Jt At + v dv dv (1) to, po t, p f dv At I dV A w = — P Jt dt + p-dp (2) J to, po 1 J. Willard Gibbs, Collected Works, Vol. 1, footnote, p. 3. 2 The terms “work of the path” and “heat of the path” are adopted from Gibbs, Scientific Papers, Vol. 1 (1906), p. 3. He says “W and H (= our Q) are not functions of the state of the body (or functions of any of the quantities, v, p, t, e and i?), but are determined by the whole series of states through which the body is supposed to pass . . . Suppose the body to change its state, the points associated with the states through which the body passes will form a line, which we may call the path of the body. The conception of a path must include the idea of direction, to express the order in which the body passes through the series of states.” 3 For a definition of line integral see W. F. Osgood, Lehrbuch der Funk- tionentheorie, p. 125. THERMODYNAMICS 16 § 10 and the heat received or heat of the path, Q, in ergs per gram is defined as the line integral, t, p r / l p ( t , p) dp + c p (t , p) d l, (3) J to, pc t, p r / c p (t , p) d t + Ip ( t , p) dp (4) J to, P 0 where c p and l p are some continuous functions of A t and Ap. 10. Reversible vs. irreversible processes: A system can not actually pass through a continuous series of equilibrium states, since according to the hypothesis made by all authors an equilibrium state is one in which the properties of the system do not change with time. 1 In reality the consideration of the “‘irreversible” processes, i.e. continuous series of non-equilibrium states, must therefore logi¬ cally precede the consideration of “reversible” processes. 2 The quantity customarily called the heat received in the re¬ versible process, but correctly named by the phrase of Gibbs “work or heat of a line” can in reality only be evaluated as the limit of the quadruple integral which is measured physically and which is the heat received in an irreversible process. Following the customary methods in treating mathematical and physical subjects, we shall, however, first take up the simpler part of the subject although it must logically be preceded by the more general case which is more complex and therefore is left until the end. 1 See § 91 2 J. Willard Gibbs, Collected Works, Vol. 1, p. 55. Gibbs has said: “As the difference of the values of the energy for any two states represents the combined amount of work and heat received or yielded by the system when it is brought from one state to the other, and the difference of entropy is the limit (my italics) of all the possible values of the integral J *(dQ denoting the element of the heat received from external sources, and t the temperature of the part of the system receiving it), the varying values of the energy and entropy characterize in all that is essential the effects producible by the system in passing from one state to another.” §11 SIMPLE HOMOGENEOUS SYSTEMS 17 There is no objection to doing this provided that in the portion left over for the time being we do not make use of any of the theorems brought out in the part treated first. In fact, the part left over is really so treated that it is logically first and anyone desiring a logical treatment may secure this by reading it first. It may also be pointed out that the treatment of so-called reversible processes does not make use of theorems deduced in the treatment of irreversible processes, and thus the mathematical treatment of each of these two parts is complete in itself. The necessity for the logical precedence of the irreversible processes is due to the physical, not the mathematical, nature of the situation. For the convenience of those readers who do not wish to spend time going through the treatment of irreversible processes the customary language of reversible processes, which Gibbs also has made use of (although as has been pointed out above he clearly recognized that a “reversible” process in reality must be treated as the limit of “irreversible” processes), will be used in the first part, and thus we shall speak of the heat received and work done in reversible processes. 11 . Transformation of heat and work integrals: Now by hypothesis p can be expressed as a function of t and v, Thus t I V = U (t, v ) t, V t,v c p d£ -j-Ip dp = J [c p + Ip dp dt d t+lpp^ dy dv to, V o Let us define and to, VO 11 dp _ Cp “ h Lp dt ~ Cv then t I l — = l h dv v ’ t, p t, v Cp dt + l P dp = to, p 0 to. VO ( 1 ) ( 2 ) (3) (4) c„ d( + l„ dy (5) 18 THERMODYNAMICS § 12 Similarly for the work integral we can make the transformation, t, p l, V - I p^dt + p^dp = - / pdv to, p o to, VO ( 6 ) 12. Differentials and derivatives of heat and work: Now the coordinates of the curve t — f (p) can be expressed as functions of the distance along the regular curve, s, measured from an arbitrary point, t = ¥>(s), p = £ (s), (1 i s S L), and is a notation for c p d£ + l p dp to, po n — 1 lim n > co 2j°p V'k) A4 + 1 P (^k, p'k) Ap k , k = 0 where the interval of the regular curve from (4, po) to (t, p) is divided into n parts by the points s 0 = 1, Si, s 2 ,., s n _i, s n = L, and L — 1 is the length of s. A4 and Ap k denote the differences 4+1 — 4 and p k+ i — p k , and (t' k , p' k ) is an arbitrary point of the kth arc, (s k _i, s k ). To evaluate the limit we may write the summand in the form: c„ (4, p'O + l p (4, P' t ) ^ As. Now since lim As —> At lim n . = cos a, 0 As As Ap a n —r~ — C°S j8, 0 As it follows, by Duhamel’s theorem, that * n — 1 C P (l'k, p'k) A4 + l p (t\, p'k) Ap k k = 0 §12 SIMPLE HOMOGENEOUS SYSTEMS 19 n — 1 iim n —> °o j^Cp (Z k, p k) COS a + l p (Z' k, p'k) cos /3 As. k = 0 The limit of the latter sum is
(L ),4> (L) V (s) f ds diHL) dL Since L is the length of arc from an arbitrary point we can now replace it by s dQ _ dZ , dp ds Cp ds ”ds’ or dQ = Cp dZ + Zp dp, where A s is the independent variable and A Z and A p depend upon A s. 20 THERMODYNAMICS § 13 Similarly dw = p f tAt+p ^ dp where A s is the independent variable and A t and A p depend upon As. 13. Definitions of the heat capacities per unit mass: Let us suppose that t and p are the properties which can be varied independently. Along any definite path s and hence and V = k (s), t = l(s), dQ dp ds p ds +p ds dW ds dv d£ _ dv dp ^ dt ds ^ dp ds* ( 1 ) ( 2 ) (3) In particular the path may be defined by the equations t = s, p = K, where K denotes a constant. Along this path dQ d Q ds dt per unit mass at constant pressure. Then which we define as the heat capacity d Q d£ c p and along this path dW d W dv ds d t V df Similarly, the path may be defined by the equations t = K f p = s, where K denotes a constant. Along this path —■ = ^ as dp which we define as the latent heat of change of pressure per unit mass at constant temperature. § 13 Then SIMPLE HOMOGENEOUS SYSTEMS 21 d Q_, dp p and along this path dW = dW = _ dv ds dp ^ dp' ( 6 ) (7) Let us now suppose that t and v are the properties which can be varied independently. Along any definite path v = j (s), t = h(s), where s denotes the distance along the curve, and hence dQ _ dt 1 dv ds Cv ds v ds and dlT _ dv ds ^ ds* ( 8 ) (9) In particular the path may be defined by the equations t — s, v = K, where K denotes a constant. Along this path ^ ^ which we define as the heat capacity per unit mass at constant volume. Then dQ dt C y ( 10 ) and along this path dW _ dW ds d£ ( 11 ) Similarly, the path may be defined by the equations t — K, v = s, where K denotes a constant. Along this path ^ = — which we define as the latent heat of change of volume per unit mass at constant temperature. 22 THERMODYNAMICS § 14 Then d Q _ 7 dv v ’ and along this path dW = dW ds dz; ( 12 ) (13) 14. The first law of thermodynamics: The FIRST LAW of thermodynamics for homogeneous systems of unit mass states that t, v (t, V) ~ e (to, po) = to, V o dv dv L c * “ p aij dt T 1 ' 1 ^ a I 1 dp (1) the line integral being extended along any path connecting the coordinates (to, po) and (t, p), where e (t, p) denotes a function of the temperature and pressure of the system. This function defined by the preceding equation is called the internal energy of the system at the temperature t and pressure p of the coordinates (t, p). We further complete the definition of this function by defining e (t 0 , p Q ) as zero, e (to, po) = 0. 1 15. Geometric interpretation of the first law: The geometric in¬ terpretation of the line integral dv dp_ ds extended along a particular path c is this: Let a cylinder be con¬ structed on c as a generatrix, 2 its elements being perpendicular to the (t, p)-plane, and let the values of the function F (s) = c P - V dv dt Ip p dv dp_ dp ds be laid off along the elements of this cylinder. Then the area of the 1 For justification of this definition see § 93 . 2 1 use the terms cylinder and generatrix in their usual geometric meaning. See W. F. Osgood and W. C. Graustein, Plane and Solid Analytic Geometry (Macmillan Co.) 1922, p. 532. SIMPLE HOMOGENEOUS SYSTEMS 23 § 16 cylinder bounded by this curve and the generatrix represents the line integral. The first law of thermodynamics is the assumption that the areas of the cylinders erected on any two curves Ci and c 2 connecting the coordinates (to, po) and (t, p) are equal. 16. The necessary and sufficient conditions for a line integral, expressed as the energy integral, to be independent of the path 1 : Let c v — V ?? and l v — Pi~ be two continuous functions in a dt dp simply connected region S. 2 Let; exist and be continuous in S. The line integral dv i d , dv and — dt c dv 7 dv l e ’- p dt\ dt -j- _ lp ~ p ep_ dp extended over a curve C lying in S and made up of a finite number of smooth pieces of curve, i.e. over a regular curve, is then and only then independent of the path if over the whole interior of S c v -p dv dt d_ dt 7 dv . ” ~ P dP J For a fixed initial point the integral is then given as'a continuous function e (t, p) of the coordinates (t, p) of the endpoint of C, the first derivatives of e being continuous and given byj the equations /. n _ dv e t (l P) G> V dp e p 0 t,p ) = l P - We shall prove first the necessity of our condition. 1 The proof given here can be readily extended up to and including the n-component variable mass case with n + 2 independent variables. The proof by Green’s theorem, although shorter, makes use of a great deal of geometric intuition, and, furthermore, it can not be extended to the other cases we deal with where more than two independent variables are present. For a further treatment of line integrals see W. F. Osgood, Lehrbuch der Funktionentheorie (B. G. Teubner, Leipzig), 1912, pp. 123-145; and A. Hur- witz and R. Courant, Allgemeine Funktionentheorie und Elliptische Funk- tionen (Julius Springer, Berlin), 1925, pp. 267-268. 2 By a simply connected region is meant a region such that no closed curve drawn in the region contains in its interior a boundary point of the region. All other regions are called multiply connected. 24 THERMODYNAMICS § 16 For this we shall assume that our line integral is independent of the path, then it is given as a function e (t, p) of the endpoint alone. We are to prove that this function is differentiable and that equations (3) hold. Now since the line integral is assumed independent of what path we choose between the limits of integration provided that the path be a regular curve lying inside the simply connected region in which the line integral is defined, we may suppose that the path of integration goes from (a, b) to (t, p), and then from ( t, p) to (l + A t, p) along a line parallel to the £-axis, i.e. along which p = constant. € (t + A t, p) — e ( t, p) = integral from (a, b) to ( t, p) + integral from ( t , p) to (t + At, p) — integral from (a, b) to ( t , p). =/ + p,P)-P d -^]dt t, v Applying the law of the mean, we write t(t + At,p) - t (t, p) = At [c, (t + a A t, p) - p dv (t + d a ' At ’ P) j where 0 < a < 1, 0 < a' < 1. Taking the limit when A t approaches zero of e (t + At, p) - e ( t, p) At u , dv gives ( t, p) = c p - p — • Similarly ( t, p) = l P -p~ ot But d 2 € dpdt and O') SIMPLE HOMOGENEOUS SYSTEMS 25 § 16 d dv , d 7 dv since — dp _ Cp ~ P and Jt y ~ v dj>_ exist and are con¬ tinuous by hypothesis, we have d 2 a 2 dp dt dt dp Therefore dp dv~\ d f dv (2') is a necessary condition for the line integral to be independent of the path. To prove that condition (2) is sufficient that the line integral (1) be independent of the path, i.e. zero for all closed paths, we shall set up a function e (t , p) such that e t (t, p) *= c p — p ^ and e p (t, p) = l p — p If such a function exists the line integral is independent of the path, for then f[c P -pf^di + [l p -pl^dp C V) d< + (t, p) dp = fdt (i, v) a* = (tl, Pi) t =
z P, 4 a, t, a 2 Diagram 1 € (t lt pi) dv 7 dv L c * - p a^J d t -f- l l ’- p r P J p dv (t, bi) dt d t -f- V i J Ip (fi, v) bi V dv(tl, P) dp 1 The assumption that the region S is a simply connected region is essential in our proof. From this assumption we make use of the fact that the integral extended over a simple closed stepped path can be represented as the sum of integrals over rectangles. Since this assumption checks the physical hypoth¬ esis we need not concern ourselves here with more complex regions. § 16 Thus SIMPLE HOMOGENEOUS SYSTEMS 27 de (t h pi) dt x c P (t x , bi) - p dv (t h bi) dt + Similarly Vi _d dhi l P (h, V) - V bi dv(t x , v) dp dp \ dv (< 1 , bi) = C„ ( Po) = 0 where 6 = V (t 0 ) = 0. 2 19. Differential and partial derivatives of the entropy: Since the line integral is independent of the path we can connect the two limits of integration by any regular curve provided that this curve lies wholly in the simply connected region in which the line integral is defined. Let us integrate over some regular curve from (a, b) to (t, p), then along the straight line from (t, p) to (t + At, p), p = constant. 1 This limit is assumed, as a physical hypothesis, to be zero for crystalline substances. Some others believe it to be zero also for liquids. 2 For justification of this definition see § 93. 32 THERMODYNAMICS § 19 7 i(t + At, p) — y ft V) — integral from (a, b) to ft p) -f integral from ( t, p) to (t + At, p) — integral from (a, b) to ( t, p) t -f At, p [ c p ( t, p) d t J 0 / t, p Taking the limit, when AZ approaches zero, of V (t + At, p) - rj (t, p) At gives rj t ( t, p) = Similarly t? p ( t, p) = Thus dT, = C fdt + l jd P , where At and A p are the independent variables. Along any definite path s Id Q 6 ds Integrating we have the line integral being extended along the given path s. For simple systems of constant mass, homogeneous composition, and having the same temperature and the same pressure at all points and in all directions at a given point we assume as a physical hypothesis that there is a functional relationship between t, p and v which may be expressed as
(P, 9) = 0, where 0 represents some function of p, r, 20. Relations between energy derivatives and heat capacities, between entropy derivatives and heat capacities, and between derivatives of heat capacities (all per unit mass): From the first law we have r (0,p) = Cp-P^j (1) and From the characteristic equation p — g(v, 6), according to the first law 6, v 0, v € (6, v) — e (6q, Vo) f c, 00, to d0 + l v dv — / p dt; -/> 00, to 34 THERMODYNAMICS §20 Hence Thus e e (0, v) = c v and e v ( 6 , v) = l v — p dc v \ _ / dl v \ / dp ,dv )e \dd Jv \dd J v From the second law we have Thus V* (9, v) = j and ij„ (0, P) = l f dp dd or / dc p \ _ /dZ p \ _ Ip \dv)e~\ddjp 0 According to the second law Hence 9, v v - v (K vo) = J -gde + l fdv do, VO V 0 (9, v) = ~ and ij„ (0, v) = ^ Thus or dv Je \ dd dcA _ / dl v \ _ ly dv Je \d0/ v 6 Combining (20.6) and (20.12) we have dp' l v = 6 dd J v (4, 5) ( 6 ) (7,8) (9) ( 10 , 11 ) ( 12 ) (13) §21 SIMPLE HOMOGENEOUS SYSTEMS 35 Substituting the value of l v in (20.12) we have ( dc v \ = Q (d 2 p dv ) e \ dd' 2 / v Similarly from (20.3) and (20.9) Substituting the value of l p in (20.9) we have _ _ n (Vv\ dp )e \de 2 J T (14) (15) (16) DIFFERENCES OF HEAT CAPACITIES PER UNIT MASS From (20.5) From (20.13) Hence lv = 0 yp c v = 6 dp dp dv dd. ,dd / „ p Substituting the values of c v and l v in (13.8) we have dQ _ /de\ dv /de\ dd dv \dv)e ds \dd/ v ds ^ds ds Substituting the values of c v and l p in (13.2) we have dQ (de\ dd (de\ dp , / ds \d0/pds \dpje ds ^ dA d0 / d A dp K dO/p ds \dp)e ds_ (17) (18) (19) HOMOGENEOUS ONE-COMPONENT SYSTEMS OF VARIABLE MASS 21. Definitions of component and phase: For the substances or components of which we consider the mass composed we shall choose chemical species or combinations of chemical species. 1 1 It would do no good, as we have seen, to choose a dynamic system con¬ sisting of electrons and protons as our system for we could not treat it thermo¬ dynamically here since our variables would not define the state of such a system. 36 THERMODYNAMICS §21 Furthermore these substances need not have any relation to the internal constitution of the system. They must, however, be so chosen that the masses of each of them in the system, that is, mi, . . ., m n , where the number of components is n, are all independent of each other and such that they will express the composition of the homogeneous masses ( = phases), over the whole range of states through which we wish the system to pass. Gibbs calls a substance an actual component of a phase when the substance is capable of a continuous increase or decrease in amount in that phase. He calls a substance a possible component of a phase if the sub¬ stance, though not initially present in this phase, exists in some other phase which is in equilibrium with the first phase and from which the first phase might abstract the substance by a continuous change of concentration. A substance would then be capable only of a continuous increase in amount in the phase in which it exists as a possible component. The actual components need give us no difficulty, but I am not able to cite any actual examples to illustrate his possible com¬ ponents. In fact some people believe that no such examples of possible components exist. Such a case would occur if we had, say, anhydrous sulfuric acid in equilibrium with some other phase from which it might abstract water. Then water would be a possible component of the phase anhydrous sulfuric acid. A possible confusion of actual components w T hich might occur is in considering dilute solutions (see Appendix). We have here two situations which depend on our choice of components. For example if we choose FeCl 3 .6H 2 0 (represented on diagram 2 as a vertical dot-dash line), and water as our components, then at a temperature of 310 degrees on the absolute thermodynamic scale and a pressure of one atmosphere a solution composed solely of FeCl 3 .6H 2 0 (i.e. the mass of the water component = 0), will be in equilibrium with crystals of the same composition. Now whether we add water to or subtract water from this liquid phase, keeping temperature and pressure constant, crystals of FeCl 3 .6H 2 0 will go into solution. Here water, for m H2 o = 0, is capable of §21 SIMPLE HOMOGENEOUS SYSTEMS 37 positive and negative values. This situation will occur when we have a maximum as illustrated in Diag. 2. On the other hand we may so choose our components that the mass of the water com¬ ponent, when zero, is capable only of positive values, i.e. can only increase in amount. Such would be the case if, for example, we chose anhydrous sulfuric acid or chloroform and water as our components, for here water can not decrease below the value zero. Diagram 2 In neither of these situations does water come under the classi¬ fication of possible component since we have either added or removed it from the whole system. For water to be a possible component of an anhydrous phase we must have the anhydrous phase in equilibrium at some state with the phase containing water, assuming of course the water can exist as a component of the anhydrous phase. This would be true if the anhydrous phase 38 THERMODYNAMICS §21 were miscible with water over the range of temperature, pressure and concentrations we are considering. We do not have to consider the internal changes in the system and thus may disregard dissociation in the phase. For example 1 let us consider a potassium chloride-water solution where part of the KC1 is dissociated, KC1^K++C1- (1) Let n" be the chemical potential of the solid potassium chloride, i u' that of the potassium chloride in solution, [x , that of the undissociated potassium chloride in the solu¬ tion, ju',, that of the potassium ion in the solution, and [i!,,, that of the chlorine ion in the solution. Now if we have the potassium chloride-water solution in equilib¬ rium with solid potassium chloride then / = **" ( 2 ) but 74.56 m', = 39.1 + 35.46 (3) and thus 74.56 p! = 74.56 (1 - a) /, +39.1 a+ 35.46 a (4) where a denotes the degree of dissociation. If we multiply (3) by a and subtract (3) and (4) we have / / M = M , or, from (2), 1 This discussion belongs here but since we have not yet defined /x it may be passed over for the time being. §22 SIMPLE HOMOGENEOUS SYSTEMS 39 The dissociation constant has thus dropped out of the equations. Furthermore we can not obtain the amount of dissociation from this kind of reasoning. Thus in order to determine the potentials of the ions one of the things we must have given us is the degree of dissociation. Each homogeneous part of a mass we shall call a phase and thus the number of phases will be determined by the number of parts of the mass considered that differ in composition or state or both. Crystalline FeCl3.6H 2 0 in equilibrium with crystalline FeCl 3 .3JH 2 0 is an illustration of two phases that differ in composition; ice in equilibrium with water is an illustration of two phases that differ in state; a water solution of sodium chloride in equilibrium with water vapor is an illustration of two phases that differ both in composition and state. Thus a phase is a geometrically connected subdivision of a physical system in which each one of the components is physically distinguishable from the same component in the other phases. 22. Definitions of heat and work: The work, W, done on the system we define by the equation t, p, m t, p, m W = — J pdv = — J mp-dt-t-mp-^dp-j-pv dm to, V o, mo to, po, mo and the heat, Q, received by the equation t, p, m Q = j m c p dt + m l p dp + / dm to, po, mo where c p , l p and / denote functions of t and p. This is really an extension of the ordinary definition of heat. To a physicist / here has meaning in terms of heat received measured as such only when there is an interchange of heat between different parts of the system; for example if we had two phases present, one increasing and the other decreasing. The physical significance of / is indicated in §24. 40 THERMODYNAMICS §23 23. The first law of thermodynamics: Then the first law of thermodynamics is expressed by the equation t 9 j) f m e ( t, p, m) - c (t 0 , p 0 , m 0 ) = J m ^c p - p^jdt to, po, mo + m (l P -p dp + 0 + / - pv) dm (1) where n denotes a function of the temperature and pressure. In the special case where the mass, m, remains constant we have t, p c (t, p, m) - e (t Q , po, m) = m J (c p - p^j d t to, po + (u - V g) d P- Now by definition e = me, then Thus and hence Now £ (to, Po, m) = m e (to, Po) = 0. E (to, Po, 0) = 0, e (t, p, 0) = 0. t, p, m t(t,p,m) - t(t,p,0) = J (jt+f-pv) dm, t, p, 0 or * ft Pi m) = (m +/- pv) m, and by definition ( 2 ) (3) (4) (5) m' then t = n +/— pv ( 6 ) §24 SIMPLE HOMOGENEOUS SYSTEMS 41 24. The second law of thermodynamics: The second law is expressed by the equation n (t, p, m) — n (to, p 0 , m 0 ) = t, p, m J mjdt-\-m~dp -f^dm to, p o, mo ( 1 ) where 6 denotes some function of t, 6 = r (t), which is the same for all systems. In the’special case where the mass, m, remains constant we have t, p n (t, p, m) - n (to, po, m) =m J ^dt + ^dp (2) < 0 , Po = mrj(t,p) - my (to, Po). Now we have defined the entropy of a unit mass simple crystal¬ line substance as zero at 6 = T (to) = 0 and p = po, V (to, Vo) = 0 and since, by definition, r n = m y we have n (to, po, m) = m y (t 0 , p 0 ) = 0 Thus n (to, po, 0 ) = 0 and hence « (t, p, 0) = 0. (3) Now or n (t, p, m) n (t,p, 0 ) t, p, m t, p, 0 n ( t, p, m) / ( t , P) m, e (4) 42 THERMODYNAMICS §25 and by definition then 77 = f(t, y) e But we have e = \x + / — pv, from (23.6), then from the relation we obtain or e = /i + 6 77 — pv H = e — 6 77 + pv. 25. Definitions of Gibbs’ thermodynamic functions: Gibbs has defined three additional thermodynamic functions £, x and 1 (r by the equations £ = £ + pv — On X = £ + pv i]r = £ — On We denote the values of the functions for unit mass by f, x and \p, that is, by definition f = m X = ~~y and m i m* Therefore we have from (24.6) for the one-component single phase system V = f- CHAPTER III Homogeneous binary systems of variable mass and composition Let us now consider systems variable in mass and composition in successive states but homogeneous in each state, that is, in each state the composition, density and temperature are the same at all points, the pressure is the same at all points and is the same in all directions at any given point. Let us consider first a homo¬ geneous system composed of two components. 26. Definitions of specific volume and mass fraction: The specific volume, v, is defined by the equation v mi -f m 2 ’ 0 < v < oo 0 ^ mi < co 0 ^ m 2 < mi + m 2 ^ 0. where v denotes the total volume of the system, mi the mass of substance Si, and m 2 the mass of substance s 2 . We define the mass fraction of the first component, m h by the equation mi mi =-j-, mi + m 2 0 ^ mi < co 0 ^ m 2 < oo mi + m 2 ^ 0. and similarly the mass fraction ra 2 of the second component by m 2 m 2 mi + m 2 ’ Hence mi + m 2 = 1. 27. Equation of state: We assume as a physical hypothesis that when any three of the properties, pressure, specific volume, 43 44 THERMODYNAMICS §28 temperature, fraction of substance si, of a particular system are given the fourth is uniquely determined, or that
- p at + l *dt- p V P dt_\ to, vo, m i 0 dt -j - , dp dvdp _ v dv ^ dp dv_ dv + 7 7 dv 7 dp dv dp imi — Inn — p 7- H Ml ~ M2 + Ip ZZ - P TZ dm i drai dp dmi_ dwi £, v, mi = c v dt ( l v — p) du 4~ (^tfi — Iwi *4* Mi — M 2 ) d?Mi ( 1 ) to, Vo, mi 0 since, by definition, § 30, we have Hence Thus C +l d -P = c t/p “ Vp ^ IsV l — = l V7) ~ l"V dv Imi Inn + h dp dni\ Iwi — Iwi de dt ~ de dv de dull Uvi — lw 2 T Mi — M 2 dc v _ dl v dp dv ” dt dt d Cy dlwi dlw 2 + dpi dp2 dmi dt dt dt dt dl v dp dlwi dlwi 4_ dpi dp2 dmi dmi dv dv dv dv 52 THERMODYNAMICS § 34 34. The second law of thermodynamics: The second law is expressed by the equation t, p, mi, m2 n {t, p, mi, m 2 ) - n (Z 0 , p 0 , mi 0 , m 2o ) = J (mi + m 2 ) ^ d t to, pc, mi 0 , mj 0 + (mi + m 2 ) j dp + dmi + dm 2 (2) where 6 is a function of t only, 6 = T (£), the same for all systems. SPECIAL CASES (1) In the special case where mi and m 2 are constant the equation reduces to the following t, p, mi, m2 f C l n ( t , v, mi, m 2 ) - n (t 0 , p 0 , m x , m 2 ) = (mi + m 2 ) / dt + ^ dp (3) to, po, mi, m2 Now n (t , p, mi, 0) = n' (t , p , m) and n' ( t , p, 0) =0 by (24.3). Then n (t, P, o, 0) =0 (4) (2) In the special case where t , p and mi are constant n (i!, p, mi, m 2 ) - n (<, p, 0, 0) = mi + m 2 l -j- (5) Hence n (t, p, mi, m 2 ) = mi l ~~ + m 2 1 -~ (6) Let 7] =-;-by definition mi T* m.2 Then rj = mi + lmt m *T = n ( l, p, mi) ( 7 ) § 34 HOMOGENEOUS BINARY SYSTEMS 53 Thus n {t, p, mi, m 2 ) = (mi + m 2 ) 77 ( t , p, mi) (8) Further we have e — m\ l mi + m 2 l m2 — pv + Pimi -f- p^m^ = Orj —pv + pimi + /x 2 w 2 (1) (9) (3) In the special case where mi + m 2 = 1, i.e. in the unit mass case, the second law of thermodynamics for binary systems reduces to t, p, mi V (t, p, mi) - 17 {to, Po, raio) = J ~ dt + ^ dp + d m x (10) to, po, mi 0 Further 77 ( t 0 , p 0 , 0) = 77 ' (t Q , p 0 ) = 0 and 77 (t 0 , p 0 , 1) = 77 " (/ 0 , Po) = 0 since we have already defined 77 ' ( t 0 , p 0 ) = v" (^ 0 , Po) = 0. Hence <977 _ Cp dt~~d dt] _ l p dp 6 dr] dnh •mi v m2 ~o ~e Thus and therefore (id ( 12 ) (13) ( 14 ) 1 This is Gibbs’ equation 93 for a binary system of unit mass. 54 THERMODYNAMICS §35 and therefore dpi dp2 Imi Imz > dt dt ~ d d ’ (15) 1 dip 1 d (Imi Imo) d dm,i d dp and therefore S’ 1 a Ps II rH r© (16) 35. Transformation of the entropy integral: By hypothesis V = V (t, v, m i), Thus t, p, mi C-n i . i l ifd< +%dp + - dm, U U U to, po, mi 0 t, v, mi Cp Ip dp d t+Yjdv+ d dv lm\ Imz | dp 0 0 drai dmi (1) to, vo, mi 0 and since, by definition, we have I / dp _ Cp "T" t/p « . C v dl l — = l bp r, by dv and dp jp dm,i Imi l m2 + Ip ^ l\Vi l Wo Then r] (t, v, mi) — rj (t 0 , Vq, m u ) = t, v, mi Si di _i_ h _i_ ^ Wi ~ ^ w * e e 6 d mi (2) to, vo, m i 0 Hence §36 and HOMOGENEOUS BINARY SYSTEMS 55 Thus and therefore and therefore dr} _ I wi — Iwj dmi 6 1 dc v _ 1 dl v l v ~e ~dv ~ ~e et ~ J 2 ’ 1 dc v 6 dirii 1 d (Iwi ~~ Iwi) Iwi Uv 2 ~6 dt ¥ ’ dfJ-i _ dji2 _ _ Iwi — l w i . ~dt ~dt ~ 6 5 1 dl v _ 1 d (Jwi — l\Vt) ~6 dmi 6 dv ’ and therefore d/j ,i d/j .2 _ dp dv dv dmi 36. Relations between unit mass and variable mass binary sys¬ tems : We shall now prove that if the functions for a binary system of one phase and unit mass are known, the functions for a binary system of one phase and variable mass may be calculated from them alone, without any additional experimental measurements. We have ■wi T ) _ d (mi + m 2 ) 77 ' t, p, rr .2 dm.! t, p, m 2 = V + (mi + m2) dr} v dm.i /1, p, m 2 = r} 4 - m 2 = 77 + 7??2 dr} dm\) t , p lm 1 ^m 2# Q 56 THERMODYNAMICS §36 and Irm _ ( dll \ e ~ \dm 2 J t , d (mi + m 2 ) v = 7 ] — m 1 P> mi ( drj \dm dm 2 — V ( m i + m 2 ) t, p (*l) \dm 2 /t, P , mi Also 7 ] — m\ de \ l-mi Inn e Ml = l T— I ~ Irm + VV + pm 2 \dmi/t, p, m 2 _ ( d (mi -f m 2 ) e \ _ \ dmi / 1, p, m 2 (tt) dmi = € + (mi + m 2 ) u+pv+pm (£^\ V de m 2 — L Jmj t ,p (mi + m 2 ) 2 + pv + pm 2 dv .dmi p = e + m-2 (1 -1 - dv . V dm, +m M2 ' lm ‘ + pv + pm 2 (—) \dmi/ 1 , p — e — 6 tj + pv + m 2 (mi “ M 2 ) Similarly M2 = (—) VSmj/,. p , — lm, + pv — pm, m2 (*L) \dm\/t, p = e + (mi + m 2 ) de - mi ^dmij \(mi -f m 2 ) 2 , - I rm + pv — pmi (—) \dmi/t,p dv e mi y l mi Imt P Qyyi ^ M 2 ) ^ rm + pv — pmi ' dv \ ,dmi/ 1 , P = e — 6 tj -f- pv — mi (mi — M 2 ) CHAPTER IV Homogeneous, n-component systems We shall now consider the general homogeneous system con¬ sisting of n components. We assume the system to be variable in mass and composition for different states but homogeneous in each state, i.e. in each state the composition, density, and temper¬ ature are the same at all points and the pressure is the same at all points and is the same in all directions at any given point. 37 . Definitions of specific volume and mass fraction: The specific volume, v, is defined by the equation v mi -f- m2 -f* m n ’ 0 < v < 00 0 ^ m k < oo, 1 ^ k (integer) n mi -f-+ m n ^ 0, r where v denotes the total volume of the system, m k the mass of the substance s k . We define the mass fraction of the k-th component, m k , as m k = _ r~r -7—> 1 ^ k ^ n, k being an integer mi -f- m2 ~r * * * * r ni n Thus mi + * * * * + m n — 1. 38. Equation of state: We assume as a physical hypothesis that
0, k = 1, • • •, n mi + • • + ni n
57
58 THERMODYNAMICS § 39
39 . Definitions of work and heat: The work, W, done on the
system is defined by the integral
t, mi, , n>n
W = — J pdv , where v = (mi + m 2 + • • • • + m n )
to, po, mi 0 , •••■ ,ninQ
v(t,pmi, -,m n _i)
Expanding we have
t, J) } Dll, •••• , mn
W = — J (mi + • • •
to, po> ••••, m no
+ m n ) p ~ t dt + (mi +
n—1
+ m n) P ^ dP + P | f +
dv V' dv
- - Zjm i-—
dm i am\_
i= 1
dmi
+
+ p
v —
n—1
s
i=l
m i
dv
dm i_
dm n .
In the special case where mi + m 2 H-+ m n = 1 (total mass
constant) mi = m h • • •, m n = m n , and the integral reduces to
t, p, mi, •••• 1 TRn -1
w= -J p ft At+p Z Ap+p ^ dmi+
to, POf Wh lg, •••• , Hl/Ti — 1 q
+ V
dv
dm n _]
dm n _!
The heat, Q, received by the system is defined by the integral
t, p , mi, ••••, nin
Q = J (mi -f m 2 +-+ m n ) [c v dt + l p dp] + Imi dmi
to, po, mi,,.IT„ 0 + • • * * + l ma dm n
In the special case where mi + m 2 + • • • • + m n = 1 (total mass
constant) that is mi = mi, • •, m n = m n , this integral reduces to
t, p, mi, Win —1
Q ~ j Cp dt ~f~ Ip dp “j - (Jmi ^m n ) dmi H - ~}~ (Jm n -i ^»i n ) dm n —1
to, PO, TTIIq, •••• , "fTln—
§40
HOMOGENEOUS N-COMPONENT SYSTEMS
59
40. Transformation of the heat integral: By hypothesis
p = p (t, v, mi, • • • •, m n _i) where m k =
m k
Thus
mi+-+ m n
l^k^n — 1, k = integer.
ty nilr •••• t m n
(mi + •••• + m n ) c p dt + (mi + • • • • + m n ) l p dp
top pOf mi 0 , •••• y mn,
t f v y m t .... | n?n
+ l m , dmi +
+ l mn dm n
— J (nii +-+ m n ) | c p -\rl p J dt + l
dp
dv
dz;
tOy V 0 » •••• » Hln 0
+
Ina H~ lp
dp -l
h " m ‘ dm i
dm\
i=l
dmi +
n—1
+
7 7 V dp
iffin lp 7Yl\
dni{_
dm n .
i=l
ty Vy mil •••• 9 n? n
== J (mi + • • • + m n ) c v dt + (mi + • • • + m n ) l v dzz
toy V0y mi 0 , •••• 9 nin 0
-f* Iwi dnii +
4- lw n dm n
since by definition
dp
Cp ~f* lp c v
l d -2 = l
tp ~ tv
dv
dp
Imk + (2 m a ) lp -— = l Wk , 1 ^ k ^ n, k = integer.
diUk
In the special case where mi 4- • • • • + m n = 1, i. e. in the
constant total mass case, this integral reduces to
ty Vy TJX\y •••• 9 TJX n—1
J c v d£ T l v di> + {Iwi — l\v n ) dmi + • • • • + (£w„_i — lw D ) dm n -i
t, v, mi 0 , ...., m a - 1 0
60
THERMODYNAMICS
§41
41. The first law of thermodynamics: The first law of thermo¬
dynamics is expressed by the equation
£ (t, p , nii,., m n ) £ (^o, Po) mio, , nino)
tf Pi mi, • ••• | llln
mi -{-•••• + m n
dt +
n—1
u - pv
dm„.
(1)
i== 1
where ah, • • • •, Mn denote continuous single-valued functions of
t, p, m h -, m n - 1 .
SPECIAL CASES
(1) In the special case where mi, • • • •, m n are all constant, the
first law reduces to the following:
e (t, p, mi,-, m n ) - e (to, p 0 , mi,-, m n ) =
tf p. Dll, •••• , Win
(mi H-+ m„) J (c p - p^j dt + (l T - p^j dp (2)
(o, po, mi, ...., m n
Now e (t, p, mi, 0, • • • •, 0) = z (t, p, m) and
£' (t, p, 0) =0 by (23.3).
Hence
z(t,p, 0, • • • •, 0) =0 (3)
(2) In the special case where t , p, mi, • • • •, m n _i are constant
the first law reduces to
t (<, p, mi,-, m„) - £ ((, p, 0,-, 0) =
( lm , — p + Ml) mi + ■ • 4- Qmn — pv Mn) m.
(4)
§41
HOMOGENEOUS N-COMPONENT SYSTEMS
61
e ft p, mi,-, m n ) = mi l mi +-+ m n l mn — pv
(mi -f- • • • • + ni n ) + mi mi + ••••+ m n m n (5)
£
Let e = -r-;- by definition
mi -f--f- m n
Then
6 = Wll l mi + * * * ‘ lm n ~ PV ”h Ml 77l\ + * * • * + Mn 7Yl n (6)
= e 0 l>P,mi ,-,m n _i).
Hence
e ft p, mi,-, m n ) = (m x +- + m n ) € ft p, mi, -, m n _i) (7)
(3) In the special case where mi + m 2 + • ■ • • + m n = 1, i.e. in
the constant total mass or unit mass case, mi = mi, • • •, m n = m n ,
and the first law reduces to
€ ft p, mi, ., m n _i) — e ft, p 0 , m u , -, m n - 1 0 ) =
tf Pf 771 lj •••• f 771 n —1
dt + l l P - v ^) dp +
/ ( c ’- - p i)
to t pOj 771 Iqi •••• f 771 n—1 q
+ 2 mi ^ + w ) ~ ( u ~ pv + 2
i=l i=l
lmi — PV — P
dv
dmi
dv .
Wli “ *4“ Mn
dmi
dmi +
i=i
n—1
+
pv v dm„_! + 2 m ' ami + Mn ~ I )
i=l
n—1
— [lmn — pv + 2 dTOn-!
( 8 )
1=1
<, p, 7»1, .... , TOn-l
= / («, - P £) d < + (l, - V g) dp + [*-. - U - V ^
ft>*fP0, 7711q 9 •••• , TTIu—Iq
+ Ml — Mn
dmi +
+
lmn -1 Ln p
dv
ton-1
— f~ Mn—1 Mn
dm n _i.
62
THERMODYNAMICS
§42
Hence
(t, p, mi,-, m n _i) = c p — p
dv
dt,
P, mi . . —i
e p (t,p,m h -= b ~ p(i^)
\°P/ t, mi, .... , Wln-l
€ mk (J'j P> Wl\, ' , 772 n _i) = lm n P “l~ Mk Mn
where l^k^n — 1, k = integer
and
e (t 0 , po, mi 0 , ., m n -i 0 ) = e' (J 0 , p 0 ) = 0 by definition
where m ko = 1, 1 ^ k ^ n, i.e. all m io zero except m ko .
Further, from the second derivatives of e, we have
dc p dv _ dip
dp~dt~~dt ’
dCp dl m k dl mn d/z k dfJ. n
dm k ~~di dt ^ ~dt ~dt’
dl v dl
OTk
dl
m n
dm k dp dp dp dp dm k
where l^kfSn — 1, k = integer.
( 10 )
( 11 )
( 12 )
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
42. Transformation of the energy integral. By hypothesis we
have
p = p (t, v, ith, -, m„_i)
Thus
^ _ Cj>
P
dv
dt
dt + ( mi +-+ m n
n—1
7 dv , 'V dv ,
l -- pv - p e^ + p 2j mi e^+^
i= 1
n—1
dmi -f- • • • • -f-
%
-p V + p^ /m ^+ tla
dm n
i=l
§42
HOMOGENEOUS N-COMPONENT SYSTEMS
63
t, v, mii •••• y nin
= j ^mi +-+ m n
to, Vo, mi 0 , ••••• y ninQ
dv . 7 dp dv dp
Cp ~ v dt + lp ~dt ~~ v &p Tt_
d t
+ 1 mi +-+ m n J | l P — p ^
dp
dv
dv
n—1
+
dv dv
l ™-v v -Vd^ + v2j m 'e^ +
Mi
i = 1
n—1
+ ( Zp-p S)(£~2 TOi £)] dm >
i = 1
n—1
+.+
Ln -/>« - + M
i = 1
d- [lp — p
dv
dp ,
n—1
~2 mi
i=l
dp
dm-J _
dm„
t, v, mil •••• i mn
= J (mi + • • • + m n ) c v d£ + (m x + • • • + m n ) (k ~ p) dv
to, Vo, mi 0 , ••••• i mn 0
dr [Iwi + Mi] dmi -(-••'• + [lw n + Mn] dm n
since by definition
, 7 dp _
Cp "r tji ^ C v
l — = l
I'P ~ v'D
dv
dp
l my + (2 m a ) l p —— = l Wk , 1 ^ k ^ n, k = integer.
om k
In the special case where mi +••••+ m n = 1, then mi = mi,
•, m n = m n , and the integral reduces to
t, V, mi .. TOn-l
c v dt -f- ( l v — p) dv + \lwi — l\v n ~h Mi — Mn] dmi
0 As ds
82
THERMODYNAMICS
§55
thus the extensions or stretch of the components, which are parallel
to the axes of the coordinates in the unstrained state, are re¬
spectively
Vl-f 2ei - 1
y / 1 H - 2 62 1
( 1 )
y /1 ~t- 2 63 — 1
where the positive values of the square roots are taken. We thus
obtain a physical interpretation of the quantities ei, e 2 , 63 .
55. The angle between two curves altered by strain. A physical
interpretation of the quantities e 4 , e 5 , e G : Let 1, m, n, and l 1 , m 1 ,
n 1 be the direction cosines of two vectors ; issuing from the point
(x, y, z) in the unstrained state and let 0 be the angle between
them. Let h, mi, ni and h 1 , md, nd be the direction cosines of
the corresponding lines in the strained state and 0 i the angle
between them.
Thus 1 = x s , m = y s , n = z 8 .
. d (u + x) d (y + v) d (z + w)
dsi ’ 1 dsi ’ 1 dsi
( 1 )
then
1 (1 + u x ) + mu y + nu z
( 2 )
1
similarly for mi, ni.
Now
cos 0i = L Id + mi md + ni nd
§55
STRAIN
83
ds ds 1
dsi dsd _
ll 1 + ll 1 u x + • • + mm 1 +
+
nn 1 +
substituting
cos 0 = ll 1 + mm 1 + nn 1 , and the values e*, • • • •, e 6
in the above expression we have
cos 0i =
ds ds 1
dsi dsi 1
cos 0 + 2 (ei ll 1 + e 2 mm 1 + £3 nn 1 ) +
e 4 (mn 1 + mhi) -f e 5 (nl 1 + n 1 !) + e& (lm 1 + Pm)
Now let the two given directions be the positive directions of the
axes of y and z.
Thus 1 = l 1 = 0, and either m = n 1 =0, m 1 = n = 1, or
m 1 = n = 0, m = n 1 = 1.
Let us arbitrarily choose m = n 1 = 1
then
cos 0 ] =
ds ds 3
dsi dsi ]
1 + C4 (1+ 0)
or
e 4 = cos 0i
dsi dsi ]
ds ds 3
and since
dsi
ds
dsPV
ds
— 0 —(1 " T ~ 2 62) + 0
— 0 -j- 0 + (1 T 2 63) + 0
thus
04
= cos 0i V(l+2e*) (1+2 e 3 )
which gives us an interpretation of the quantity e 4 . Similarly
with e 5 , e 6 .
84
THERMODYNAMICS
§56
56. Linear dilatation at a point of the system; ELLIPSOID OF
DILATATION at this point: Let the displacement be from P to
Pi. Let P 1 be a point in the neighborhood of P, and Pp the dis¬
placement of this point. From our assumption of continuity Pp
will be in the neighborhood of Pi.
In the strain PP 1 = As is displaced to P] Pp = Asi which is, in
general, a change in length and orientation. Let us consider
changes of length only,
where
lim Pi PP — PP 1 dsi
PP 1 -*!) PP 1 “ ds 1
>
5 =5 0 , 8 ^ — 1 .
Let 1, m, n, be the direction cosines of PP 1 , i.e.
1 dX 4 .
1 = -T-, etc.
ds
( 1 )
( 2 )
Now from equation (53.4) we have
dsp = (1 + 2 ei) dx 2 + (1 + 2 a) dy 2 +
therefore
(£)' -
(1 -f* 2 6 i) l 2 —{— (1 —f— 2 € 2 ) m 2 -f- (1 -f- 2 63 ) n 2 -f-
2 e\ mn + 2 e 5 nl + 2 e 6 lm.
dsi
( 3 )
We want to represent the change in about a point P. To do
this let us take on PP 1 a length PQ where
H dsx 1 + 5*
and let the vector PQ revolve an angle of 2 t about P as center.
Let Px, Py, Pz represent the system of rectangular coordinates.
Thus in the unstrained state we have
x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = 1
(4)
§57
and
STRAIN
85
y-„(PQ)-mg
-W-C
then the equation (56.3) reduces to
1 = (ds^) = (1 + 2 ei) x 2 + (1 + 2 € 2 ) y 2 + (1 + 2 e 3 ) z 2 +
2 e 4 yz + 2 e 5 zx + 2 e 6 xy = \J/ (x, y, z) ( 5 )
and this quadratic is an ellipsoid about P as center.
The points of no change must satisfy equations (56.4) and (56.5)
simultaneously (assuming that the sphere touches or cuts the
ellipsoid, otherwise no such points exist).
r
Thus
1 = (1 + 2 ei) x 2 +(l+2 e 2 ) y 2 +(l +2 e 3) z 2 -j-2 e 4 yz+2 e 5 zx-f-2 e§ xy
1 = x 2 + y 2 + z 2
0= 0.
§58
Then
STRAIN
87
£i — an + 2
, 1
02 — 9 - 22+2
,1
03 — 933 + o
9 n 2 + 92 i ? + a 3 i 2
9l2 2 + a 2 2 2 + 9 3 2 2
9is 2 + 9 2 3 2 + 933 2
04 = a 3 2 + a 2 3 + a 12 ai3 + a 2 2 a 2 3 + a 3 2 a 3 3
05 = a 3 i + a 13 + an an + a 2 i a 23 + 931 a 3 3
06 = 921 + an + an an + a 2 i a 22 + a 3 i a 32
Let us simplify these formulae by the aid of a translation. Since
aw, a 2 o, a 30 do not enter into ei they can be made zero without
modifying the deformation.
Let
£ = + 9io
V — v' a 2 o
r = + a 3 o
then
£' = (1 + an) x + a i2 y + an z
V = a 2 ix + (1 + a 22 ) y + a 2 3 z (5)
= a 3 ix + a 32 y + (1 + 933 ) z
In these formulae the origin goes into itself since when 0 = x = y
= z we have £' = tj' = f' = 0.
In the following treatment we shall assume that an, a 2 o, a 3 o
have been eliminated by the above transformation and drop the
primes.
58. Pure strain: In homogeneous strain there is one set of
three orthogonal lines in the unstrained state which remain
orthogonal after the strain, the direction of these lines being in
general altered by the strain.
A homogeneous strain is defined as a PURE STRAIN when
there exists in the first state three orthogonal lines which remain
THERMODYNAMICS
88
§58
unaltered in direction by the strain. These directions are called
the principal directions of the pure strain.
Let OXYZ be the principal directions.
Let x, y, z be the coordinates of the point P before deformation,
and £, 77, f be the coordinates of the corresponding point Pi after
deformation.
The deformation being homogeneous, the expressions for £, 77, £
as functions of x, y, z are given by
£ = (1 + an) x + ai2 y + a ]3 z
77 = a2i x + (1 + a 2 2) y + a23 z (1)
r = a 3 i x -f- a 32 y + (1 + a 33 ) z
where aij are constants.
By hypothesis, when P is on OX then Pi is on OX; thus, when
y and z are zero, 77 and must be zero whatever value x may
have, i.e. asi and a 3 i must be zero identically. Similarly all the
other coefficients except an, 2^2, a 33 are zero.
Thus we have the pure deformation referred to its principal
directions given by
£ = (1 + an) x
77 = (1 + a 22 ) y (2)
f = (1 + a 33 ) z.
Now in order that a homogeneous deformation be a pure
deformation it is necessary and sufficient that the field of vectors
PPi be derived from a function of the vectors, i.e. that u, v, w be
the derivatives of a function of second degree in x, y, z.
The condition indicated is necessary for, if the deformation is
pure, then on taking for axes the principal directions OXYZ we
have the coordinates of Pi defined as functions of those of P by
£ = (1 + an) x
77 = (1 + a2 2 ) y
t — (1 + a 33 ) z,
from which, for the projections u, v, w of the vector PPi on the
axes OXYZ, we have
u' = £ — x = an x, v' = a^ y, w' = a 33 z
§58
which one can write
STRAIN
89
on setting
dF
dz’
an X 2 + a 22 y 2 + a 33 z 2
It is sufficient: for suppose that, in the general formulae defining
u,v,w for any homogeneous deformation with respect to the axes
OXYZ, u, v, w be the partial derivatives of a similar function
F(x, y, z), or, what amounts to the same thing, suppose that
du _ dv
dx “ dx’.’
i.e.
a i2 = a 2i , a 23 = a 32 , a 3 i — ai 3 .
The function F is then
F
1
2
an x 2 + a 22 y 2 + a 33 z 2 + 2 a^ yz + 2 a 3i zx + 2 a^ xy ,
which gives
u
dF dF dF
t-, v = — , w = — .
dx dy dz
The surfaces of second degree given by
F (x, y, z) = const.
play with respect to the vector u, v, w the role of plane surfaces.
These surfaces have the same center 0 and the same directions of
the principal axes OXYZ. Let us revolve the axes so that we have
as our new axes OXYZ and call x', y', z' the new coordinates of a
point P, and u', v', w' the new projections of the vector PPij the
function F will take on the reduced form
an x' 2 + a 22 y' 2 + a 33 z /2
90
THERMODYNAMICS
§59
which gives
an x',
a2 2 y',
a 3 3 z'.
The deformation is then pure, being equivalent to three simple
extensions in three directions mutually at right angles.
59. Strain tangent at a point: Let P be any point in the system
before the strain and have as coordinates x, y, z; and let p represent
an infinitesimal portion of the system around this point P, i.e ., let
p represent the neighborhood of P. Let P 1 (x + Ax, y -f- Ay,
z + Az) be a point in p.
Let P be displaced to Pi in the strain, then the coordinates of Pi
will be £ = x + u, ?? = y + v, £* = z + w, and if P 1 is displaced
to Pd in the strain then the coordinates of Pp are given by
£ + A£ = x + u +A(x + u)
^7 + A ?7 = y + v + A(y + v) (1)
£ + A£* = z + w + A(z + w)
which, on expanding A (x + u), etc., can be written in the form
. . . , du du du
dx dy dz
y + v+Ay + gAx+gAy + ^Az (2)
dw dw dw
z + w + Az + Ax + ~ Ay + ^ Az
dx dy dz
when squares and products of Ax, Ay, Az are neglected. (When
the displacement is sufficiently small the approximation involved
in this simplification will lie within the experimental error and thus
will give an accurate expression of the physical facts.)
Now let us change our coordinates so that P(x, y, z) is the
origin and Px 1 , Py 1 , Pz 1 the coordinate axes.
§60
STRAIN
91
Let P 1 (x 1 , y 1 , z 1 ) and Pp (U, 77 1 , £ l ) be the coordinates of P 1 and
Pi 1 respectively with respect to this coordinate system; we then
have the coordinates of P 1 given as x 1 = Ax, y 1 = Ay, z 1 = Az,
and those of PP given by
U = u + (1 + u x ) x 1 + u y y x + u z z 1
rj l = v + VxX 1 + (1 +v y )y 1 + VzZ 1 (3)
£-1 = w + Wx x 1 + w y y 1 + (1 + w z ) z 1
Formulae (59.3) giving the coordinates of the point PP as
functions of the coordinates of P 1 define the deformation of the
region m around P and mi around Pi. As they are linear in x 1 ,
y 1 , z 1 they define a homogeneous deformation, and we can ac¬
cordingly say that, in a sufficiently small neighborhood of a point
of the system, the relative displacements are linear functions of
the coordinates, i.e. THE STRAIN ABOUT ANY POINT IS
SENSIBLY HOMOGENEOUS.
In identifying with formulae (58.1) it is necessary to make
an u x , ai 2 Uy, ai 3 u z , a 2 i Vx, a 22 Vy, a23 v z ,
a 3] = w x , a 32 = w y , a 33 = w z . (4)
In order that the homogeneous deformation defined by (59.3)
be a pure deformation it is necessary and sufficient that a 3 2 = a 2 3 ,
a ]3 = a 3 i, ai 2 = a 2 i (see theorem back) i.e. that w y — v z = 0,
u z — w x = 0 , v x — u y = 0 .
60. Very small deformations: Suppose that a continuous me¬
dium is deformed in a continuous manner and so that the displace¬
ment PPi of each of its points P be sufficiently small such that
the scalar squares and products of these displacements can be
neglected, i.e. the approximation involved would lie within the
experimental error. Such a strain has also been called infinitely
small.
The six characteristic functions referred to the general equations
(53.5) neglecting the squares of the partial derivatives of u, v, w
with respect to x, y, z give us
61 = u x , e 2 = v y , e 3 = w z , e 4 = w y + v z , e 5 = w x + u z ,
e 6 = Vx + u y .
(i)
92
THERMODYNAMICS
§61
Then u, v, w can be written
u = u x x + u y y + u z z
= 61 x + i (e 6 - v x + u y ) y + ^ (e 6 - w x + u z ) z
= ei x + i e 6 y + ^ e 5 z - co z y + z (2)
similar y
v = ic 6 x + e2y + ^e 4 z - co x z+co z x (3)
w = i e 5 x + ^ e 4 y + c 3 z - co y x + w x y (4)
where
2 C0 X Wy Vz, 2 COy U Z W X , 2 C0 Z V X Uy.
61. Conditions of compatibility for strain-components: The
fact that all six of the strain-components can be expressed in
terms of the three component displacements indicates that these
six quantities must be, to some extent, interconnected, i.e. if we
assign an arbitrary expression to each strain component we shall
not in general obtain a possible distribution of strain since the
conditions for continuity of the system after strain will as a rule
be violated.
The values of the components of strain e\ as functions of x, y, z
must satisfy the relations e\ = u x , etc. If we introduce the three
relations 2 co x = w y — v z , etc., then all the partials of u, v, w with
respect to x, y, z can be expressed in terms of e\, ., e 6 , u x , co y , co z .
We have
m
. 1 1
Uy + o V x — S Vj
= \ (V* + Uy) - | (Vx - Uy)
1
2 e 6 ^z
( 1 )
§61
STRAIN
93
, 1 1
Vx = Vx + ^Uy - 2 Uy
= \ (Vx + Uy) + i (Vx - U y )
= 2 + w z (2)
Similarly for u z , w x , w y , v z .
The conditions that these be compatible with the equations
Ux = 6l) .
are given by the 9 equations
%
dei _ 1 de^ dco z
dy 2 dx dx’
which express the partials of co x , w y , co z , in terms of e x .
Now the equations containing o> x are
a dto x
de 5
dfi6
(3)
2 — =
dx
~ dy
dz
2 dUl -
dei
2 ^?
(4)
dy
dy
dz
2 dw
= 2 —
d^4
(5)
dz
dy
dz
Differentiating (61.3) with respect to y and (61.4) with respect
to x, and subtracting we have
o d 2 e 2 = d_
dx dz dy
dei de 5 , de 6
dx dy dz
( 6 )
Differentiating (61.4) with respect to z and (61.5) with respect
to y, and subtracting we have
d 2 e\ _ d 2 e Xi > xj — 5
ji + v>yi>yi-y
Zi + € > Zi > Zi — e
where i = 1, • • • •, n
respectively.
Consider an arbitrary neighborhood of mass m and coordinates
(x, y, z,). We can divide the forces applied at this neighborhood
into two parts.
(1) Those which make up the interior forces acting on m; we
shall call Xi, Y i, Z x the projections of one of these forces.
(2) Those which make up the exterior forces acting on the
same m; we shall call X e , Y e , Z e the projections of one of these
forces.
Isolate one of these neighborhoods. If the system is in equilib¬
rium, then each neighborhood or particle of the system is in
equilibrium.
In order that such a particle be in equilibrium it is necessary
and sufficient that the resultant of all the forces acting on the
particle be zero. Projecting them on the coordinate axes we have
then, for the equilibrium of the particle m, the three equations
2li + 2l e = 0
27i + 27 e = 0 (1)
2Zi + 2Z e = 0
98
THERMODYNAMICS
§63
where 2 denotes the sum of the projections of all the interior
forces applied at m.
Summing up for all particles of the system and letting the
number of particles increase without limit, i.e. the sizes of the
particles approach zero as a limit, we have
“ n n
1 1
and since the system is in equilibrium therefore
similarly with the other two.
In equations (63.1) multiply the first by — y, the second by x
and add, this gives us
2 (x Fi — y Xi) + 2 (x Y e — y X e ) = 0;
Summing up these equations for all the particles m n and letting
n increase without limit we have
lim
n
00
Now
1
= 0 .
n
§64
STRESS
99
represents the sum of the moments of all the interior forces with
respect to the O z axis; this expression is then zero by hypothesis
and therefore
n^Tco 22 (xy e -yXe) = °, etc.
This gives us
Xidv = 0, Y idv = 0, Zidv = 0,
(x Y i - yXO dv =0, (yZi - z FO dv = 0, (3)
(z Xi — x Z i) dv = 0,
or
X e dv = 0, / / / Y e dv = 0, Z e dv = 0,
(x Fe - yXe) dv = 0, (yZe-z Ye) dv = 0, (4)
(z X e — X Z e ) dv = 0.
i.e. For any system to be in equilibrium it is necessary that the
sum of the projections of the interior or exterior forces on the three
coordinate axes and the sum of their moments with respect to
each of the three axes be zero.
64. Equations of equilibrium: The body forces applied to any
portion of a system are statically equivalent to a single force applied
at one point together with a couple. The components, parallel to
the coordinate axes, of the force can be written
///»-«-. ///pi-dv, ///pZO, (1)
100
THERMODYNAMICS
§64
where p, in general a function of x, y, z, is the density, and where
the limits of integration are the bounding surfaces of the system.
The moments about the origin of these components will be
P [yX - x Y] dv,
p[zX — xZ] dv,
(2)
p[zY-yZ] dv
Similarly the tractions applied at the surfaces, d, of the system
are equivalent to a resultant force and a couple.
The resultant force can be written
X„dd, Y„dd, / / Z v dd
( 3 )
and the moments of these components about the origin
[y X v — x Y v ] dd, [zX y — x Z v ] dd, [z Y„ - y ZJ dd. (4)
Thus for equilibrium we have six equations, from (63.3),
X dv + / / X„ dd = 0
P 7dv+ / F„ dd = 0
p Z dv + / / Z v dd = 0
( 5 )
[X y - x Y] dv + / / [y X v - x Y v ] dd = 0
p [z X — x Z\ dv + / / [z — x Z„] dd = 0 (6)
p [z Y - y Z] dv + / / [z F„ - y ZJ dd = 0
§65
STRESS
101
65. Specification of stress at a point: Through any point O in
a body there passes an oo 2 system of planes and the complete
specification of the stress at 0 involves the knowledge of the trac¬
tion at 0 across all these planes.
We can express all these tractions in terms of the component
tractions across planes parallel to the coordinate planes, and to
obtain relations between these components. Let X x , F x , Z x denote
the vector components of the traction across the plane x = con¬
stant, and a similar notation for the traction across the planes
y = constant and z = constant.
The capital letter denotes the direction of the component
traction and the subscript the plane across which it acts. The
sense is such that X x is positive when it is a tension, negative
when it is a pressure.
Consider the equilibrium of a tetrahedral portion of the body,
having one vertex at 0 (x, y, z), and the three edges that meet at
this vertex parallel to the axis of coordinates. The remaining
vertices are the intersections of these edges with a plane near to 0.
Denote the normal to this plane drawn away from O by v, so that
its direction cosines are cos (x, v), cos (y, v), cos (z, v). Denote the
area of this plane by Ad.
(1) The projections of the external forces acting on the volume
Av (body forces), are approximately
— p X Av, — p Y Av, — p Z Av
where p denotes the density at 0. [The approximation will be¬
come more accurate as the volume of the tetrahedron becomes
less.]
(2) The projections of the stresses on the surfaces of the tetra¬
hedron will be given approximately by
— X x Ad cos (x, v), — F x Ad cos (x, v), — Z x Ad cos (x, v)
— X y Ad cos (y, v), — Y y Ad cos (y, v), — Z y Ad cos (y, v )
— X z Ad cos (z, v), — Y z Ad cos (z, v), — Z z Ad cos (z, v)
X , Ad Y v Ad Z v Ad
where X„ Ad, Y y Ad, Z v Ad are the resultant tractions across the face.
102 THERMODYNAMICS § 65
[This approximation will become more accurate as the volume of
the tetrahedron becomes less.]
The sum of these projections on any axis must be zero since by
hypothesis the body is in equilibrium; thus on 0 x we have
— pX Av — X x Ad cos (x, v) — X y Ad cos (y, v) — X z Ad cos (z, v)
-{- X v Ad = 0
Dividing by Ad, and letting Ad approach zero as a limit, we have
X v = X x cos (x, v ) -f X y cos (y, v) + X z cos (z, v)
„ lim Av
+ pA Ad^0Ad
But
Av
Ad • Op
4
where O v is the height of the tetrahedron from the vertex 0.
Thus
«
Av _ Ad Op
Ad ~ Ad 4
Op
T
and therefore
lim Av _ lim Op
A d—>0Ad - Ad—>0~4
Hence we have
X„ = X x cos (x, p) + X y cos (y, p) + X z cos (z, p) (1)
similarly
Y v = 7 X cos (x, p) + Yy cos (y, v) + Y z cos (z, p) (2)
Z v = Z x cos (x, p) + Z y cos (y, v) + Z z cos (z, p) (3)
By these equations the traction across any plane through a
point 0 is expressed in terms of the tractions across planes parallel
to the coordinate planes.
On substituting the values of X„, Y y , Z v from equations
(65.1, 2, 3) in equations (64.5), (64.6) we have the necessary
§65
STRESS
103
conditions for equilibrium with respect to the body forces and
surface tractions given as
p(yZ - z F) dv +
p (x Z — z X) dv +
p(xF-yl) dv +
cos (x, v)
yZx-zYx
+
cos (y, v)
yZ y -zYy
+
cos (z, v)
y Z z - z Y z
| d>
1
w
X
1_1
| dd = 0.
( 4 )
= 0
» xir+ JJl x x cos (x, v) + X y cos (y, v)
+ X z cos (z, v) J dd
Ilf" ri - + IF. F x cos (x, v) + Y y cos (y, v)
+ Y z cos (z, v) J dd = 0 (5)
III
p Z dv -f-
Z x COS (x, v) + Zy cos (y, v)
+ Z % cos (z, v) J dd
= 0
104
THERMODYNAMICS
§65
According to Green’s Theorem we can write
X x cos (x, v) + X y cos (y, v) + X z cos (z, v)
dd
d X x , d X y , d X z
dx
+ ^ +
dy dz
dv
( 6 )
Equations (65.5) can thus be written
pl +
d X x , d X y , d X z
dx dy
dz
dv = 0,
similarly for the other two.
Now this region v was wholly arbitrary. We can understand by
v then any subregion of the original region v and this equation will
still hold for this new subregion. Therefore the integral must
vanish at every point of v, or
Similarly
and
v dX x dX y dX z
dx dy dz
Y + d i d Yy i d . X z
^ dx ^ dy ^ dz
= 0
z + ~+ —+ —= 0
dx dy dz
Again, we have from Green’s Theorem
( 7 )
/
(y Z x - z Y x ) cos (x, v) + (y Z y - z Y y ) cos (y, v)
+ (y Z z — z Y z ) cos (z, v)
dd
§65
STRESS
105
d(yZ y - zYy)
dy
d (y Z z — z Y z )
dz
dv
or simplifying,
Thus equations (65.4) can be written
/('
" z (
z+
d Z x , d Z y , d Z j
dx
+
dy
+
7.[pY + a -^ + dY
dx
dy
y +
dz
d_F z
dz
)
)
+ Z y - Y z
dv = 0
and similarly for the other two.
But the coefficients of y and z are, from equations (65.7),
identically zero, and the whole integrand is identically zero since
the region v was wholly arbitrary, thus
similarly
Z x = X z , and X y = F x .
In order to simplify the writing of equations we shall use the
following abbreviations:
X 2 = Fy
X 3 = Zz
X 4 = Zy = Y z
X 5 = X z = Z x
X 6 = F x = X y
THERMODYNAMICS
106
§65
which are then analogous to e\, • • •, e% which for very small de¬
formations are given by the expressions
dv
03
dw
dz
04
dw
dy
dw du
dx ‘ dz
dv . du
06 = T-r T—
dx dy
CHAPTER VII
Thermodynamic treatment of systems homogeneously strained
In this chapter we shall limit ourselves to systems homo¬
geneously strained and leave the treatment of systems in which the
strain is not homogeneous to Chapter IX.
66. Definitions of work and heat: Now a homogeneously
strained system has been defined as one the properties of which are
the same at all points of the system, i.e. are constant with respect
to the coordinates x, y, z.
For the systems treated previously we found that the work
received by the systems could be defined by the integral — J p dv.
Now we discover that for stressed systems this expression will not
define the work received by the systems. We must therefore extend
the definition of work, such that it will express the work received
by the stressed system and such that, when the stresses can be
represented as pressures which are the same at all points and in all
directions at any one point of the system, the expression will
reduce to the integral —Ip dv.
Hence we define the work per unit mass, W, received by the
system homogeneously strained or work of the path by the equation
6
so i = 1
where ei, • • •, e 6 are functions of t , X 1} • • •, X 6 ; t, Xj • • •, X 6 depend
upon the path S. p is the density in the state of reference.
Thus
6
6 6
w =
1 dt ds
dei dt
dei dX k
dX k ds
Ids
so
i = 1
k = 1 1 = 1
107
108
THERMODYNAMICS
§66
Now when X\ = X 2 = X 3 = — p, X A = X 5 = X 6 = 0 we have
SO
SO
Hence .our definition satisfies the boundary conditions, namely
that it will reduce to the previous definition of work received when
the stresses reduce to pressures which are the same at all points
and the same in all directions at any point of the system.
Similarly the heat per unit mass, Q , received by the system
homogeneously strained or heat of the path is defined by the
equation
6
i = 1
so
where c x , 1 X1) • • •, l Xe are functions of t, X-\, • •, X 6 and t,X h • •, Xg
depend upon the path S. p is the density in the state of reference.
Now when Xi = X 2 = X 3 = — p, X 4 = X 5 = X 6 = 0 this ex¬
pression reduces to
So
since here
§68
HOMOGENEOUSLY STRAINED SYSTEMS
109
Hence our definition reduces to the previous definition of heat
received when the stresses reduce to pressures which are the same
at all points and the same in all directions at any point of the
system.
67. Definition of c x , l Xl , • • •, l Xt : Along the path t ~ S, Xi = Ki,
• • •, X 6 = K 6 where Ki, • • •, K 6 are constants,
dQ = dQ
dS dt
which is by definition the heat capacity per unit mass at constant
stress. Thus ^ = - c x \ and along this path
at p
6
dW dW 1 de {
ds dt p £J Xi dt'
i = 1
Along the path t = K, X x = S, X 2 = K 2 , • • •, X 6 = K 6 where
K, K 2 , • • •, K 6 are constants,
dQ _ dQ
dS - dX]
which is by definition the latent heat of change of stress per unit
mass parallel to the x-axis, where temperature and the other stresses
are constant. Thus = - l Xl and along this path
a A i p
6
dW dW 1V Y dei
dS dXi P ^J Ai dX,
i = i
Similarly for the other stresses.
68. Transformation of the heat and] work integrals: Now by
hypothesis Xi, i = 1, • • •, 6 can be expressed as functions of ei, t ,
X i fi (#1, ' f @6) 0 y i 1> * * >6.
110
THERMODYNAMICS
§68
Thus
Let us define
Ce
Then
tf X\f ••• t A 5 tf ••• « 6$
The transformation of the work integral, as we have seen, gives
tf -X"ly ••• y Xq tf 6lf • ••f €0
Along the path t = S, e- x = Kd, i = 1, • • •, 6 where Kd are con¬
stants, ^ which is by definition the heat capacity per unit
mass at constant strain, that is, where e\ y i = 1, • • •, 6 are constants.
Thus ~ = - c e . And along this path = 0. Along the
§69
HOMOGENEOUSLY STRAINED SYSTEMS
111
path t = K, e\ = S, e 2 = K 2 1 , • • •, e& = Ke 1 , y§ = which is by
Cl b Q61
definition the latent heat of change of strain along the x-axis per unit
mass where temperature and the other strains are constants. Thus
dW
d Q 1 j
d* ~ p iei '
And along this path
dS
AW 1
= - Xi. Similarly for
the other strains.
69. The first law of thermodynamics : The first law of thermo¬
dynamics, for a unit volume system homogeneously strained, is
expressed by thejequation
P € ( t, X-], * f Po € (to, * * , X 6 0 )
tf A. I* ••• f A6
We complete the definition of pe(t, X 1 , ■ • •, X 6 ) by defining the
energy per unit volume at to, X u , • • •, X 6o as zero,
po c (to, Xi 0 , • • •, Xo 0 ) = 0, (3)
where po denotes the density in the state of reference.
Hence
6
p*(4,X„... > X,)-«.+ 2 Xi S (4)
i = 1
p (i, X„ • • •, X 6 ) = +2 X = (5)
And from the second derivatives of p e we have
112
THERMODYNAMICS
§70
Similarly
or
S C x n SCn 1 n
- —, n = 1, . • - ,6.
SX,
SX n dt St
dXil
l X2
+2XA
i = i
i = 1
Six 1 \ / Sl X 2 \
v ai 2 / A. 3 » ••• f Ag \(9 Xi/f, x 2 ,..., y 6
a^i \ / Se 2 \
k SX 2 / tj X^l> ^ 3 * ) -A.6 \s xj tf A.2* ••• i As
Similarly
az
Xm Shn
S &m a^n
ai n ax m ai n ax m ’
, (m, n) = 1, • • •, 6
(6)
( 7 )
70. Transformation of the energy integral: By hypothesis
Xi = fi {e-[, • • •, e&, t), i = 1, • • •, 6.
Thus
ty Aij ••• y Ag
6
+2 Zi Hi _ d( + S _^+2 Zi Ir k _
dXt
i = 1
tot Xi 0 , ... i YgQ
k = 1
i = 1
tf 6 i 9 ... , €$
6
+S Zi Hi + 2 |>+2 Zi Hr k .
i = 1 k = 1 i = 1
ax k i
st
dt
^o» ^io» ••• *
6
+2 ^+2 Zi A
ax k
a«i
dei
k = 1
i = 1
+ ••• +2[^+2 Zl aYi_
ax k
Se 6
de 6
k = 1
^9 @lf ••• 9 €6
= / C (
dt +2/
le\ + Xi
dei
( 1 )
§71 HOMOGENEOUSLY STRAINED SYSTEMS
since, by definition
113
Hence
c x
+2
k = 1
6
2
k = 1
dXi
'Xk
dt
Cp
'Xk
dX k
dCi
— l ei , i — 1, • • •, 6.
P tt (t, 6], • • •, e 6 ) — c e
P *ei (t, 6i, • • • , = lei "T Xi, i = 1, • • • , 6.
( 2 )
( 3 )
And from the second derivatives of e we have
dc e
dl
e\
\d 6]/ 1, ez, ..., ee \ dt
+
^1» • • • » ^6
aii
dt
ei, ..., e6
or
dC e _ dlg D . dX n
de n ~ ~dt ~^~dt
, n = 1, • • - ,6.
( 4 )
Similarly
dl em dle a dX n dX m
dCjx d6 m dc m d& n
, (m,n) = 1, • • -,6.
( 5 )
71. The second law of thermodynamics: The second law of
thermodynamics, for the unit volume system homogeneously
strained , is expressed by the equation
P v (l) Xi, • • •, Xq) — po rj (to, X u , • • •, X6 0 )
^ dXi, where 6^0,
u
and where p 0 denotes the density in the state of reference.
114
THERMODYNAMICS
§72
We assume,
as a physical hypothesis, that for systems
in stable
equilibrium
lim c x
6-^0 6
(3)
We thus extend the definition of the entropy function by de-
fining the entropy at 6 = T ( t 0 ) = 0, X ]o • • •, X 6o , as zero,
i.e.
Po 7] (to, Xi oi • • • , X6 0 ) — 0.
(4)
Now
pr U (t,X 1 ,..-,X ls ) = c -‘
(5)
P Vxi (t, Xi, • • •, X.) = -^, i = 1, • • •, 6.
(6)
And from the second derivatives of prj we have
1
R
1
R
II
o
(7)
and
TT ~l¥ =0 ’ (m,n) = V-->6.
u -Xx m U -A. n
(8)
Thus from (69.6) and (71.7)
and from (69.7) and (71.8)
d@xi dCm
dX m dX n
72. Transformation of the entropy integral: By hypothesis
Xi = fi (ei, • i = 1, •• *,6.
Thus
tf 1 , ••• 1 \ 6 ••• t ffl
k = 1 i =» 1
§73
HOMOGENEOUSLY STRAINED SYSTEMS
115
^0* 61 q, ••• • ^6q
since by definition
6
Hence
Q
PVt (t, e h • • •, ee) = j
PVe a (t,e i, • • •, e 6 ) = y
And from the second derivatives of p rj we have
d Ce dl en le a
de n dO 6
and
die n __
56m dCn
Thus from (70.4) and (72.4) we have
l ea = - Q
ain
aa
, n = 1, • • -,6.
£ 11 ••• * ^6
And from (70.5) and (72.5) we have
a In _ ax m
a^rn a^n
( 2 )
(3)
(4)
(5)
73. Derivation of Gibbs’ equation 12 for strained systems:
Assuming that we can solve for a as a single valued continuous
THERMODYNAMICS
116
§74
function of 77 , ej, - • • ,e& and obtain f as a continuous function of
rjj eij • • •, e& we obtain
Thus
or
••,*) = (f-;) e .
dd
ee \&V/ ei, ... , ee
= i c , • p 6 - = e
P C e
. v de de dd
e h ■■■,*)=-+--
= -Ze,+ +
P P P \ 6 Ce)
— -Xi, i = 1, • • •, 6.
P
dt = d drj -j— Xi dgi
i = 1
de = 6 dn + v X* d^i
i = 1
where v denotes the total volume in the state of reference.
74. Differential and partial derivatives of Gibbs* Zeta: By
definition
f
= € — 6 7] — - Xi 6i
1 = 1
Hence
Thus
p f = p r (#> Xi, • • •, x 6 )
§75
HOMOGENEOUSLY STRAINED SYSTEMS
117
6
6
= — PV
p Xi, • • •, Xq) = p — p o
-2
i = 1
Xi
de x
dTn
— — e n , n — 1, • • •, 6.
Hence
and
dt]
dX~n
lden
p dd
, n — 1, • • •, 6.
Thus
6
dC = — n dd — v e x d Xi
i = i
where v denotes the total volume in the state of reference.
75. Differential and partial derivatives of enthalpy or Gibbs* Chi:
By definition
6
• = 1
— x Xi, • • •, X 6 )
118
THERMODYNAMICS
§76
Thus
xAv,X u ---,X e ) =(p)
1 de de x 1 'V'* £ dei
dy/eu ...,« P ^ dei dr] p ^ 1 dr]
i = l i = l
= * + ;;S*S-!S*‘£
p dr] p dr]
i = l i = l
=9
Xxn ( V, Xh • * * > Xs) —
Thus
and
Hence
de dei 1 1 y
deiJTv - ~p e " ~ ~p 'dT a
i = 1 i = 1
1 'S'' v dei 1 1 'V' V dei
pZj Xi dX 0 P e ° „Zj Xl ax,
i = 1
1
p *■» dX n
i = 1
6 n -
P
dx = 6 dr] - - ^ e i d
i = 1
dd _ 1 de n
dX n p 6))
dx = 6 dn — v e x d Xi
i = 1
where v denotes the total volume in the state of reference.
76. Differential and partial derivatives of Gibbs’ Psi: By
definition
\p = e — 6 rj
Hence
pxP = p\f/(d,e i, • • - ,e 6 )
§76
Thus
HOMOGENEOUSLY STRAINED SYSTEMS
119
p \J/ e (By e h •
pie n (By e h •
Hence
and
Thus
* * > Ce) — P
e6
le n *T X n le n
— X n , n = 1, • • •, 6.
d\p = — 77 d 0 + - Xidei
p
i = 1
dr] _ 1 d X n
de n p dd
i n I? * * ■; 6.
dt{r = — n d0 + v Xi dej
i = 1
where v denotes the total volume in the state of reference.
CHAPTER VIII
The stress-strain relations for isothermal changes of state
77. Generalized Hooke’s Law of the proportionality of stress
and [strain: We shall now consider the special case where the
changes of state take place at constant temperature.
Then
Ah fj (cij 62, 63, 64, 65, e$), 1 1* * * * > 6, (1)
X\, • • •, Xa being zero in the state of reference, i.e. when 61 , • • •, e 6
are zero. Developing these according to the McLaurin expansion
we obtain series proceeding according to increasing positive powers
of ei, • • •, 6 e. If we neglect terms containing products and powers
of 6 ], • • •, 66 we shall have for X h • • • ,X 6 linear homogeneous ex¬
pressions in 61 , • • •, e 6 .
In the following discussion we shall assume as a physical
hypothesis that the GENERALIZED HOOKE’S LAW OF THE
PROPORTIONALITY OF STRESS AND STRAIN holds, i.e.
that each of the six components of stress at any point of a body
is a linear function of the six components of strain at the point.
W
78. Strain-energy function, —, for isothermal changes of state:
From the second law we know, for any closed path consisting
of a continuous series of equilibrium states in which the temper¬
ature remains constant, the heat of this path must be zero.
Vi
Qs = J 0i dn = 01 (til — n 0 )
VO
where Qs is the heat of the path S from the state in which n = n 0
to the state in which n = «i.
VO
Qa = J 0i dn = 0i (n 0 — ni)
>71
120
§79
ISOTHERMAL STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONS
121
where Q ff is the heat of the path a from the state in which n = tii
to the state in which n = n 0 .
Thus
Qs + Qa = [( n i — Ho) + (no — nj)] = 0.
Hence the heat of the path for a continuous series of isothermal
equilibrium states is independent of the path and thus, for a fixed
initial state, is a function of the final state only.
Therefore this must also be true for the work of the path and so
for an isothermal change of state we have, for the work received
by the system,
the line integral being extended along any path connecting the
points (ei 0 , • • •, e 6o ) and (e h • • •, e 6 ).
W
79. Strain-energy function, —, for adiabatic changes of state:
Now for changes of state that take place adiabatically, i.e. where
no heat is gained or lost by any part of the system, we have for the
W
work — received by the system of unit volume,
W
v
which, from the first law of thermodynamics, is independent of the
path for, in this case.
- (ti, • • * > e%) — - (to, e\ 0 , • • •, e 6o ) = —
Now since we have assumed the stresses to be linear functions
d /W N
of the strains, and since •— ( — ) — X\. i = 1, * * •, 6, the strain-
de, \ v /
W .
energy function —- is therefore a homogeneous quadratic function
of the strains.
122
THERMODYNAMICS
§80
80. Static vs. dynamic methods of determining the stress-strain
relations. Relation between W for isothermal and W for adi¬
abatic changes of state. Now Xi are in general functions of
W
t,e i, • • •, e 6 . Therefore the strain-energy function — will not as
a rule be the same for the adiabatic and the isothermal changes
of state. Thus from a theoretical point of view Xi, (i = 1, • • •, 6),
as determined experimentally by statical methods (involving
isotherma] changes of state) will differ from Xi, i = 1, • • •, 6, as
determined experimentally by dynamical methods (involving adi¬
abatic changes of state). This has experimentally been shown to
be the case although the measured differences were not very large.
Now stress-strain relations, as determined by statical methods,
have been applied, in some cases it seems rather indiscriminately,
to adiabatic changes of state. Therefore it might be well to stress
the point that, when using these two strain-energy functions as
interchangeable, the burden of proving that the discrepancies
between the two are negligible for the problem under consideration
rests with the user.
81. The elastic coefficients or “elastic constants” of the system:
From §77, we have Xi, i = 1, • • •, 6 given as linear homogeneous
expressions in h = 1, • • •, 6. Hence we can write
6
Cih ^h> 1 1 >
h = 1
In these equations the coefficients Ci h of e h number 36. These
coefficients depend on the constitution of the body at the point
P (x, y, z) in question; for a body whose constitution varies from
point to point these coefficients will be functions of x, y, z.
Assume that the system is homogeneous in the reference state,
i.e. its constitution is the same at each point. The density p, and
the 36 coefficients are then constant for the system under obser¬
vation.
If we substitute the values of Xi, • • •, X 6 from (81.1) in
123
§ 82 ISOTHERMAL STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONS
we find that the “Elastic Constants’’ Ci h are the coefficients of a
2 W W
homogeneous quadratic function —where — is the strain-energy
function; they are therefore connected by relations which insure
the existence of the function. These relations are of the form
Cih = c h i, (h, i) = 1, • • •, 6 (2)
and the number of constants is reduced from 36 to 21.
2 W
v
22
i = 1 h = 1
Cih e\ e h where c ih = c h i.
82. The stress-strain relations for isotropic bodies: In iso¬
tropic solids every plane is a plane of symmetry and every axis
is an axis of symmetry, and the corresponding rotation may be of
any amount. Hence the equations connecting stress components
are independent of the axes of coordinates, i.e. of direction. Thus
W . .
— is invariant for all transformations from one set of orthogonal
axes to another.
We shall assume the theorem 1 that in the transformation of the
quadratic expression the following are the only invariants with
respect to transformations from one set of rectangular axes to
another
ei + e ci2 + 2A)J
_ T (ci2 + R) _
Cl2
2 (C]2 + R)
(15)
Whatever the stress system may be, the shearing strain cor¬
responding with a pair of rectangular axes and the shearing stress
on the pair of planes at right angles to those axes are given by
Xq — R e e, X±. = R 64 , X$ = R e 5 (lb)
and are independent of the directions of the axes. The quantity R
is defined as the MODULUS OF RIGIDITY.
For convenience the relations between these elastic moduli for
isotropic substances are summed up in the table on page 128.
84. Anisotropic character of homogeneous crystalline sub¬
stances : The most important examples we have of non-isotropic
homogeneous bodies are crystalline substances.
We assume as a physical hypothesis that the symmetry possessed
by the crystallographic form of the substance applies also to every
physical characteristic of the substance. The substance may,
however, possess some physical characteristics that belong to a
higher order of symmetry. An example of this is the optical iso¬
tropy of isometric crystals.
In general the stress-strain relations will be dependent on the
rectangular set of coordinate axes chosen; however, the crystallo¬
graphic symmetry relations make possible certain transformations
of the coordinate axes for which the quadratic expression remains
unaltered. The restrictions imposed on the strain components by
128
THERMODYNAMICS
§84
such transformations for which the quadratic expression remains
unaltered result in a simplification of the elastic constants, the
amount of simplification depending on the invariants of the trans¬
formation. 1
ELASTIC MODULI OF ISOTROPIC SUBSTANCES
o
►—*
H-*
II
>
C 12 = B
R
O
II
CQ
K
R
E
cr
A
A
—-
B + 2 R
3K+4K
3
E (1 — < 7 )
1 - or - 2 nin
y
and from §43,
dlm k \
dp / d, mi, ... , m n
am k \ dd)
e, p, mi,
mk—if mk+i, ... ,m n
The most widely applicable method for obtaining is the
freezing point method (see §100). This method, and the others
listed below, for determining fx k presuppose a knowledge of the
thermodynamic relations between phases.
Gibbs 1 has shown that n\, the thermodynamic potential of
1 J. Willard Gibbs, Collected Works, vol. 1, p. 65.
154
THERMODYNAMICS
§99
constituent k in the solid state is equal to /x k , the thermodynamic
potential of constituent k in the solution, when the solid phase of k
is in equilibrium with the solution.
Thus, knowing the // k of the solid phase k, we can obtain the
ju k of component k in the solution along the equilibrium line of solid
k and solution.
Other methods have been found useful in special systems.
For example electromotive force measurements on reversible cells
(see §101), can be used in binary systems to obtain /x 2 over the
range of applicability provided we know the value at some one
point in this range. Again osmotic pressure determinations have
been used with success in special cases and may become more
widely useful in the future, for Townend 1 has extended the appli¬
cability of this method to aqueous solutions of electrolytes and
solutions in organic liquids, his methods being particularly appli¬
cable to dilute solutions.
l mk may be obtained directly where reversible cells can be
used by measuring the temperature coefficient of the electromotive
force. However, in general, l mk can not be obtained directly.
By measuring the heats of mixing in a constant volume calori¬
meter under non-equilibrium conditions we can get e as a function
of the component masses, further e must.be measured over the same
temperature interval in which the known values of hi, ■ ■ •, n n lie,
otherwise we must obtain e as a function of temperature and the
component masses. Then l mk can be obtained as a function of the
<9e
mass fractions at the temperature and pressure at which -— and
dm k
Mk were obtained,
<3s \
dm k / e, v, mi,
f fhk —ly nik+lj ••• t
Again by measuring the heats of mixing in a constant pressure
calorimeter under non-equilibrium conditions we can get x as a
1 R. V. Townend, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 50, 1928, p. 2958.
155
§ 100 INTRODUCTION TO THE TABLES
function of the component masses. This is sufficient provided
is given for the same temperature as hi was obtained where 1 =
1 , • ■ n, otherwise we must obtain x as a function of tempera¬
ture and the component masses. Then l mk can be obtained as
a function of the mass fractions at the temperature and pressure
<9 v
at which -—■ and ju k were obtained,
dm k
dm k / e, p, mi,
Mk*
, mk-i, mk-Hi, •••» m n
100. Fundamental equation for a binary system of variable
mass: “Fundamental equation” is used in the same sense as Gibbs
(Collected Works, vol. 1, p. 88) defined it. For any homogeneous
mass whatever, considered in general as having n independently
variable components, to which the subscript numerals refer (but
not excluding the case in which n = 1 and the composition of the
body is invariable), there are relations between certain of the
thermodynamic quantities from which, if the relations are known
explicitly, with the aid only of general principles and relations,
we may deduce all the relations subsisting for such a mass between
all the thermodynamic quantities for the homogeneous mass.
Thus if we can evaluate explicitly, for a homogeneous system
or phase, the functional relationship between the quantities
or
or
or
or
c, n, v, mi, • • • , m n
<,0, p,m h • • -,m n
V > mi, ■, m.n
tb 0, v, m x , • • •, m n
@1 V > Ml) ’ ) Mn
we have a fundamental equation for the phase in question.
156
THERMODYNAMICS
§ 100
As an example we shall indicate how a fundamental equation
may be obtained over all or part of a region of a binary system of
variable mass.
►
The method illustrated will be one which is readily capable
of being extended to systems containing more than two com¬
ponents.
H 2 0 / 9 .6 .754 7 .6 .5
KQ 0 / .2 .246 .3 .4 .5
Mass Fractions
Diagram 4
The particular system chosen is the system, or phase, potassium
«
chloride-water. Since we are not able to obtain a fundamental
equation from a consideration of this single phase we must also
know the thermodynamic properties of potassium chloride and
of water and use the relations existing between phases in equilib¬
rium with each other.
INTRODUCTION TO THE TABLES
157
§ 100
The density of KC1-H 2 0 solutions must be measured as a func¬
tion of the temperature, pressure, and concentration of KC1.
This gives us the characteristic equation for the phase KC1-H 2 0.
Next calorimetric measurements must be made to obtain the
heat capacity per unit mass at constant pressure, c p , as a function
of the temperature and concentration of KC1 at some one pressure,
let us say atmospheric pressure.
Let
_ c, ___ /
Mice Sice Ml
MH2O in solution Ml
Mkci = Tkci = M2'
MKC 1 in solution M 2
Along AB of diagram 4 1 , which is the equilibrium line between
Ice and KC1-H 2 0 at p = one atmosphere = 1.013 X 10 6 baryes,
Mi = Mi-
But
Now
Ml' = Tice = e + pv — d 77
e, p
{6, p) - € ( 0 O , p 0 ) = J (c p - p d 0 - [e
do, Po
dv . dv
d8 + P Vp,
dp
where e ( 6 0 , p 0 ) = 0 by definition 2 and
e, p
n (0, V) - v (0, p) = / J d$
Cj
e
do = 0 , p
where 17 ( 0 , p) = 0 by definition . 2
Hence we know ix\ and therefore mi along the line AB. Similarly
we know /x 2 ' and therefore ju 2 along the line BC.
Now in order to determine mi at any point S in the region ABG
of diagram 4, we must know
e (§A
\dd J Pt mi
m n
Coordinates (0,273) should be denoted by A.
2 See § 93 for justification of these definitions.
THERMODYNAMICS
158
§ 100
As we found in §99 it is sufficient to know l mi as a function of the
concentration at some one temperature and pressure.
To do this we shall measure the heats of mixing under non¬
equilibrium conditions in a constant pressure calorimeter to
obtain x as a function of the temperatuie range CHi, (1) i.e. the
temperature range in which the known values of mi and m lie,
and the component masses mi and m 2 at atmospheric pressure.
Thus we get
/ -( d *\
Lmi — l ~ ) Ml
\dmi/e, P , m 2
dm 2 / o, p, mi
— M2
Hence we have l mi and l m2 as known functions of 0, p, m\ since, from
§99,
d_ flmi\
dd \ 0 /
d
dmi
and^
dp
Thus we now have mi in the region GBA and M 2 in the region
GBC. We still have to determine M 2 in GBA and mi in GBC.
At B, the triple point, the three phases ice, KC1, and solution
are in equilibrium, hence
Mi' (262.6°, p) = M 2 ' (262.6°, p) = mi (262.6°, p, 0.754)
where p = 1.013 X 10 6 baryes.
1 If we know 2C as a function of 0, mi, m 2 then we have directly
Thus
X = < + 0n
Mi (02, Pi, mi) mi (0i, Ph mi)
02
0i
#2, PU m l, m 2
8 2 \dmje, p. m,
0i, pu mi, m 2
d0
§ 101 INTRODUCTION TO THE TABLES
But we know mi as a function of temperature,
159
And from §50 we have mi d/u + m 2 d ^2 = 0 where temperature and
pressure are constant.
Therefore
M 2 (0, V: Wl) ~ M 2 (0, v, Wlo)
P, Wll
(9, p, mi 0
which gives us m 2 in the region GBA. Similarly we get mi in the
region GBC.
Hence we now have v, c p , m 1 , M 2 , Imi and l m2 as known functions of
0 , p, m\ which is all we need to know in order to formulate a
fundamental equation for a binary system.
101. Electromotive force measurements: If our binary solution
is an electrolyte, which is the case for our KCI-H 2 O 1 solution
except at infinite dilution, it is sometimes possible, if we know the
value of H 2 at one point in the region in which this method is
applicable, to obtain ja 2 and l m2 rather readily by experiment.
Accurate measurements of electromotive force, however, become
increasingly difficult at high dilution and therefore of increasingly
doubtful value.
We shall set up a double cell in which the process is reversible,
i.e. can be made to go forward and backward through the same
series of states or path Furthermore our cell is one in which the
chemical reaction or “transference” is known.
The electrolyte in the cells is a potassium chloride solution,
KCl(aq). In cell I the concentration of potassium chloride is m 2
and in cell II is m 2o .
A g + KC1 (aq)- > K + Ag Cl + aq-> A g + KC1 (aq)
The net result is to transfer a certain amount, m 2 grams, of KC1
from the solution I to solution II.
1 Duncan A. Maclnnes and Karr Parker, J. A. C. S., vol. 37, 1915, pp.
1449-1455.
163
THERMODYNAMICS
§ 101
We shall consider this double cell as a whole and to simplify
nomenclature write a prime, as (' where we mean £ for the com¬
bined cells (£ of I + < of II).
Now since the process in the cell is a reversible one 1 taking place
at constant temperature and pressure we can write
n'
Q' = J 6 dn = 0 (n' — n/)
n'o
where n' 0 and n' denote the total entropy of the combined cells
at the initial and final states respectively.
The mechanical and electrical work W' and W/ respectively
v', q =q
W' + W e '=-^ pdv' + £dq
v'o, q = 0
= — p (v' — VoO — E q
where E denotes the electromotive force and q the quantity of
electricity that flows.
The total energy change is then
e' - t 0 ' = d (n' — n 0 ') — p (v' — v 0 ') — E q
1 See §92, for definition of “reversible process.”
INTRODUCTION TO THE TABLES
161
§ 102
or
C'-Co'= -E q
But
C' - Co' = m 2 M 2 - m 2 M 2 0
where m 2 is the mass of KC1 transferred from cell I to cell II, the
w T ater remaining constant.
Hence
M2 — M 2o =
Eg
m 2
which gives us M 2 (t, p , mi) if we know M 2 0 ( t , p, m io ).
From the temperature coefficient of the electromotive force we
obtain l m2 since
d/i 2
dd
This method, however, lacks the general applicability of the
previous method discussed.
V> mi, m 2
J fTL2
T m
102. The second derivatives (Table II): The second derivatives
may be divided into two groups.
Any second derivative formed from the first n + 8 variable
uantities is of the type
d_/dv\
_dd \dp/e, mi, ... , m„ _
_dp \dd) Pt mi
, ir.n
Any second derivative which includes the work and heat is of the
type
~ d^ / dW\
_(ld \ dp / 0 , mi, ... , m n
7^
^/dW
_d p \ dd
p, mi, ..., m n _
The number of combinations of second derivatives is so great
that it can not be reduced to a reasonable number, as could the
number of combinations of first derivatives.
162
THERMODYNAMICS
§ 102
All that has been attempted here is to tabulate a number of the
standard second derivatives so that the relations thought to be of
most use may be found readily by ordinary formal differentiation
and algebraic elimination.
It can easily be shown (see §99) that there are 4 + 3n + 3n 2
standard second derivatives,
d 2 V d 2 V d 2 v d 2 V d 2 V d 2 V ,
dd 2 ’ dd dp’ dd dm k ’ dp 2 ’ dpd m k ’ dm h dm k ’ v
+ m n )
dc p ' d
dd ’ dm k
(nil + • • • + m n ) c p
. d Mk .
’ dm h ’
and
d Lk .
dm h ’
where (h, k) = 1, ...n.
As an example we shall evaluate
d_fdn
_dp \ddj Pi mii ... , ir n _
d, mi, ..., n?n
by means of the tables.
- ( m l + * * • + m n) -J
\d v/ p, mi, ... , m n "
from Table I Group 2.
~±(dn\
_dp \dd/ p t mi.m n _
6, mi, ..., m n
L A{ (mi + ... +mn) |;
d, mi, ..., m n
- i (mi +
+ m„) 1 dCp
dp / e, mi, ..., m n
d 2 v\
p, mi,...,
m n
from Table II Group 1.
In dealing with the second derivatives of Q and W care must
be used since, in general, if the order of differentiation is changed
the value of the second derivative is changed, for Q and W are
not functions of the state of the system but of the path traversed
in reaching that state.
INTRODUCTION TO THE TABLES
163
§ 102
For example
d / dW\
_d P \ dd /p, mi,..., m n _
Of mi, • •• , ITn
dv\
dd/ p f mi, ..., m n
- V
d_(dv\
_dp \d0/ Vt mi,..., m n _
8, mi, ... , m n
d / dW\
_d0 \ dp / e, mi, ..., m n _
p, mi, ..., m n
= ~ V
d_ /dv\
_dd \dp/ d, mi, ...,
m n J
p * nil, ••• 9 nin
Table II has not been completed as far as Table I because the
expressions become very clumsy and furthermore the extension
of this table can be made rather readily by formal differentiation
which gives derivatives that can be evaluated by Tables I and II.
For example suppose we wish second derivatives where m g , v, t, n
are held constant. Let us choose one of the derivatives which
may be involved, namely,
d_
_dp
dv
,dm k / p 1 m;_
m g , v, e, n
Now by formal differentiation we have
d 2 v
dp dm k
d_ / «3v \
_dp \dm k /e, p, mi.
"a ( dv ^
_dd \dmjg, p, mi _
d 2 v \ / dm k \
dm k 2 / e, p, m\ dp J
d ( dv\
_dm h \dm k /e, P , mi _
+
9, mi, ... , m n
p, mi, ..., m n
'dd\
K dp/ m g , v, e, n
+
+
m g , v, e, n
8, p, mj
dm h
dp / m gl v, e, n
The values of the first and second derivatives on the right hand
side of the equation are given in group 73 of Table I, and in groups
1, 2, and 9 of Table II respectively.
'
■
■ ' . j
. 4 ’;-
.
PART II
165
KEY TO TABLES
The numeral denotes the group number, the letters following
are the variables held constant in the group.
All the component masses constant. Thus the groups in this
section include all the thermodynamic relations existing for one
component unit mass systems (constant total mass).
1. 0, mi ..m n 4. mi, ..., m n , t 7. mi, ..., m n , x
2. p, mi, ..., m n 5. mi, ..., m n , n 8. mi, ..., m n , ifc
3. mi, ..., m n , v 6. mi, ..., m n , £
All the component masses but one constant. Thus the groups
in this section, together with the above groups, include all the
thermodynamic relations for one component variable mass systems
or two component unit mass systems (total mass constant).
9.
0,
p, mi*
19.
V, m i,
<
29.
m^
2C *
10.
e,
mi,
v
20.
P, mi,
30.
mi,
L
til
11.
e,
mi,
e
21.
P, m i,
31.
mi,
",
£
12.
e,
m^
n
22.
mi,
v,
£
32.
mi,
",
x
13.
e,
mi,
£
23.
mi,
V,
n
33.
mi,
",
14.
e,
mi,
24.
m^
V,
£
34.
mi,
£,
X
15.
e,
mi,
*
25.
mi,
V,
2C
35.
mi,
£,
ik
16.
V,
mi,
v
26.
mi,-
V,
4
36.
mi,
2C,
4
17.
v ,
m^
£
27.
mi,
£>
n
18.
P>
mi,
n
28.
m i?
£
All the component masses but two constant. Thus the groups
in this section, together with the above, include all thermodynamic
relations existing for two component variable mass systems or
three component unit mass systems (constant total mass).
37. 0, p, m g , v* 40. 0, p, m g , £ 43. 0, m g , v, e
38. 0, p, m g , z 41. 0, p, m g , x 44. 0, m g , v, n
39. 0, p, m g , n 42. 0, p, m g , t|j 45. 0, m g , v, £
* mi denotes all the component masses except mkj m g all except mt and mh.
167
168 THERMODYNAMICS
46.
o,
m g ,
V, JC
62.
V,
m g ,
V,
c
80.
m g ,
V,
c,
X
49.
e,
m g ,
£> C
65.
P,
m g ,
X
81.
m g ,
V,
c,
50.
o,
m g ,
X
66.
P,
m g ,
82.
m g ,
V,
x,
*
51.
e,
m g ,
67.
P,
m g ,
",
c
83.
m g ,
£ ,
",
C
52.
e,
m g ,
68.
P,
m g ,
",
X
84.
m g ,
£ ,
",
X
53.
e,
m g ,
n > X
69.
P,
m g ,
",
4
85.
m g ,
£ ,
",
54.
e,
m g ,
70.
P,
m g ,
C,
X
86.
m g ,
£ >
c,
X
55.
e,
m g ,
C, x
71.
P,
m g ,
C,
4
87.
m g ,
£ ,
c,
56.
o,
m g ,
C, ife
72.
P,
m g ,
X,
88.
m g ,
£ ,
X,
*
57.
e,
m g ,
X, ^
73.
m
g, v,
£ ,
n
89.
m g ,
",
c,
X
58.
P,
m g ,
V, £
74.
m
g, v,
£ ,
c
90.
m g ,
",
c,
59.
V,
m g ,
v, n
75.
m
g, V,
£ ,
X
91.
m g ,
",
x,
60.
P,
m g ,
v, <
76.
m
g> V,
£ ,
92.
m g ,
X,
til
61.
p,
m g ,
V, X
77.
m
g, V,
",
<
All the component masses but three constant. Thus the groups
in this section, together with the above, include all the thermo¬
dynamic relations existing for the three component variable mass
systems or four component unit mass systems (total mass con¬
stant). This also includes all the relations thought to be of
practical value for systems of more than four components.
93.
0,
p,
m b ,
v,
£*
106.
o,
P, m b ,
C,
it
119.
e,
m b ,
X
94.
e,
p,
m b ,
V,
n
107.
0,
P, m b ,
X;
. ^
120.
e,
m b ,
<1
95.
o,
p>
m b ,
V,
<
108.
e,
m b ,
v,
£ ,
n
121.
o',
m b ,
C,
X
96.
0,
p,
m b ,
V,
X
109.
e,
m b ,
v,
£ ,
c
122.
o,
m b ,
C,
97.
0,
p,
m b ,
V,
110.
e,
m b ,
v,
£ ,
X
123.
o,
m b ,
X;
t!r
98.
o,
p,
m b ,
£ ,
n
111.
o,
m b ,
v,
£ ,
4
124.
o,
m b ,
C,
X
99.
0,
p,
m b ,
£ ,
<
112.
e,
m b ,
V,
",
C
125.
o,
m b ,
100.
o,
p,
m b ,
£ ,
X
113.
e,
m b ,
V,
",
X
126.
o,
m b ,
x>
101
0,
p,
m b ,
£ ,
114.
e,
m b ,
V,
",
+
127.
o,
m b ,
C,
X,
102
e,
p,
m b ,
",
C
115.
e,
m b ,
V;
C,
X
128.
p,
m b ,
v,
n
103.
o,
p,
m b ,
",
X
116.
o,
m b ,
V,
C,
129.
p,
m b ,
V,
<
104.
e,
p»
m b ,
",
tlr
w
117.
e,
m b ,
V,
X,
130.
p,
m b ,
V,
X
105.
o,
p,
m b ,
C,
X
118.
o,
m b ,
£ ,
",
<
131.
p,
m b ,
V,
4
* mb denotes all the component masses except mh, mk, m y .
169
132.
V ,
m b ,
v,
",
c
133.
P,
m b ,
V,
X
134.
V,
m b ,
V,
",
135.
V, nib,
V,
C,
X
136.
P,
m b ,
V,
C,
*
137.
P,
m b ,
V,
X,
*
138.
P ,
m b ,
",
c
139.
P,
m b ,
",
X
140.
P,
m b ,
",
141.
P,
m b ,
c,
X
142.
P,
m b ,
c,
KEY TO TABLES
143.
P, m b ,
£,
X,
144.
P, m b ,
",
C,
X
145.
P, m b>
",
c,
146.
P, m b ,
",
147.
P , m b,
C,
x,
*
148.
m b , v,
£,
",
C
149.
m b , v,
£,
",
X
150.
m b , v,
",
151.
m b , v,
£,
C,
X
152.
m b , v,
£,
c,
4
153.
m b ,
v,
£,
X,
154.
m b ,
v,
",
C,
X
155.
m b ,
v,
",
c,
156.
m b ,
v,
",
X,
Ifc
157.
m b ,
V,
C,
X,
158.
m b ,
",
C,
X
159.
m b ,
£,
",
c,
4
160.
m b ,
",
x,
161.
m b ,
C,
x,
162.
m b ,
",
C,
x,
TABLE I
First Derivatives
6, mi, • •, m n constant.
(dp) = - 1
(dv)
dv
dp'
N dv . .dv
{dt)=P di + e d9
(A \ <3v
(an) = M
00 = - V
02C) = “
v — 6
dv
Yd
= p
(dW) = p
(dQ) = 0
dv
dp
dv
dp
dv
d0
Group 1
Group 2
p, mi, • • •, m n constant.
m = i
,, s dv
(av) - T0
dv
(dc) = (mi + • • • + nin) c p ~ V ~qq
170
TABLE I—FIRST DERIVATIVES
171
0*0
00
0x)
0«
(dW)
(dQ)
mi • •
m
(dp)
(dt)
(dn)
00
02C)
0*fc)
(dW)
(dQ)
Group 2 (Con.)
i (mi -f • • • + m n ) c p
— n
(mi + • • * + m n ) c f
dv
- p re~ n
dV
-~ p re
= c p ( mi + • • • + m n )
Group 3
, m n , v constant.
_ dv
dp
dv
= ~d9
= (mi + • •
= 7 {(mi +
. \ dv ,
+ m n ) c p — + d
(S)'
6
dv (dv
+ m n ) c p — + 0 l
dp
dd
dv dv
v dd~ n dp
dv ,
v ^+ (m > +
dv
+ m n ) c p — + 6 [ —
(S)'
= — n
dv
dp
0
(mi +
dv
+ m n ) c p — + 0
(is)’
172
THERMODYNAMICS
Group 1+
mi, • • •, m n , e constant.
m
. dv dv
~ e d6~ P dp
d"V
(dp) = - (mi + • • • + m n ) c v + p —
(dv) = - (mi +
dv (dv
+ m „) Cp --^-
v P , . . N dv (dv
(3") = -f m n ) Cp — - v Up
w-(*s+»g)-’[
(mi + • • • + m :
dv~|
»)c P P d9 J
0X) =
- (mi -+ m„) c„ I p — + v
/ dv \ dv ( dv \
A p ^ + y )- p ee\ 0 de- y )
(d»4)
-(
*fs+*
[•
+ p|c p (mi+ ••• +m n )g + e(^
(dW) = v (mi H-+ m n ) +p 6 (||
(dQ) = -p(m,H-f- m„) c„^ - p 6
Group 5
mi, • • •, m n , n, constant.
(dp) =
(mi +•••-{- m n ) c p
Q
(dv) — — - (mi + • • • + m u ) c p —
P
0
$ v
(mi + • • • + m n ) Cp — + 6
TABLE I—FIRST DERIVATIVES
173
Group 5 (Con.)
C r)v
00 = — (mi + • • • + m n ) -j v + n —
0x) = ~ ( m i + • • • + m n ) — v
04)
V
e
(mi +
+ m n ) c p
dv
dp
+ 6
+ n
dv
dd
( d W)=|(m 1 +....+m n )c p g + P (^) 2
(dQ) = 0
Group 6
mi, • • •, m n , C constant.
(dd) = V
(dp) = n
x dv, dv
( av)=v- + „-
. . i dv . dv . .
(at) = - n (e- + p-) + v
(mi + • • • + m n ) c p — p
C dv
(dn) = (mi + • • • + rn n ) ~fv — n —
0x) = (mi + • • • + m n ) v c p + n ( v - 6
dv
dd
)
(a*t)
( dv dv\
--V(v-+n-)~vn
fAXlT\ dV dV
(dw) = — pv —- — pn —
*dd y dp
(dQ) = (mi + • • • + m n ) c p v — dn
dv
Yd
>
CO <"0
174
THERMODYNAMICS
Group 7
mi, •
m
(dp)
(dv)
(dc)
(6n)
(at)
, m n , 2C constant
dv
= v — 6
dd
= - (mi + • • • + m n ) c p
= v^-c p (m I+ ... + «.)§?-fl(g)
= (m, + • • • + mn) c p (pf v + v) +
= ^ (mi H-+ m n ) c p v
= - (mi H-+ m n ) c p v - n - 6^)
m = -
= — n^V —
Q dv
d dd>~ P
v ^ - (mi H-+ m n ) (
- 6
dv
Jo.
dV v dV (dv'
v--(m I+ ...+m n ) Cp --a^-
(dW) = - p
(dQ) = (mi H-+ m n ) c p v
mi, • • •, m n , t|r constant
(dp) = P^ + n
Group 8
TABLE I—FIRST DERIVATIVES
175
(6n) =
(50 =
(5jc) =
(dW) =
(dQ) =
6, V,
(5m k ) =
(5v) =
(5e) =
(an) =
(50 =
(5x) =
(50 =
(dW) =
(dQ) =
dv
~ n dd~
Group 8 (Con.)
P (S) _p 7 P(mi+
. dv av'
nv + p(v- + n-
n(v-ef e ) + p
dv
dd
- (mi +
- e
dv
M
+ m n )
dv
dp
v dv
+ m n )c p -
dv
— p fl¬
ap
-an—-
8 68
- p (mi + • • • + m n ) c p
dv
dp ’
Group 9
constant.
\am k / e, p, mi, ..., mi-it
mk+i, •••» m n
Pk + ^mk P
dv
am k
l
mk
J
Pk
Pk d - ^ik
Pk — p
dv
- V
am k
dv
am k
176
THERMODYNAMICS
Group 10
d, mi, v constant
(dp) =
(dm k ) =
(dt) =
dv
dm k
dv
dp
dv dv dv
N 1 7 dv . dv dv
(an) +
Q mk dp 1 a<9dm k
00 =
Mk
dv
dp
dv
dm k
0&) = 0k + U) - v )
dv
dm k
(a *) = Mk s
(dW) = 0
/•.^N 7 dv , n dv dv
(dQ) - l ™dp + 9 dddm k '
Group 11
6, mi, e constant.
(dp) = -
(dm k ) = -
(dv) = -
Uk + ^mk P
dv dv
^ + P~r~
dd dp .
dv
dm k _
, ,7 \dv ■ a dv dv
(j*k + U) ap + e 39amk _
V ( dv\dv p, dv
(an) - v dm J ge e U dp
TABLE I—FIRST DERIVATIVES
177
Group 11 (Con.)
(ac) = -M k (^ + P g) + v(^
(ax) = - G»k + U) (pg + ▼) - (*§
0*)--lMk-p^)fl|5 + pUg
(dWJ-^ + Wpg + ^g^
Mk
dv
- V P
(AQ)
-(
dv \ n dv 7 dv
Mk pimk a^
8mi
mi, n constant.
Op) = - y
Group 12
(dm k ) --
(av) - -=if-
(ae) = —
00 = -
dv
dd
Imk dV
dv dv
6 dp
dd dm k
(uk —
dv \ dv
^ dm k / dd
dv
^39
--L
e ‘
dv
Mt aa'
_ Ii
8 mk
+ e "‘'‘dp
m
--(
6v \ 6v p 7 dv
Mk-p aiWae + e Uk dp
SA\ir\ dv dv p dv
(dW) P aeami[ + 9 U a .
(dQ) = 0
178
THERMODYNAMICS
Group 13
6, mi, ( constant.
(dp) = — Mk
(dm k ) = v
(dv) =
O) =
(an) =
av . dv
av\
Mk ^ ^ + p Ijp) + v ^ Mk + lmk
dv . Lk
^00 + v T
(djc) = Mk 9 ^ + v l
mk
(34) =
dv . ( dv\
MkP ^ + v V Mk_? ’^/
dv dV
(dW)= MtP ^-pv —
(dQ) = Mk ® ^ + v Z mk
av \
P am k /
6, mi, x constant,
(dp) = — ^ — i
mk
(dm k ) = - d + v
Group Ilf.
(av) - 0* k + U) ap
\ dv
am k
(dt) = (Mk + lm k ) ^P + v j +
, v dv . V 7
(an) = Mk ^
(*s - ’)
P
av
ami
dv
(ac) = d Mk v l m]t
TABLE I—FIRST DERIVATIVES
179
Group 14 (Con.)
fN , dv . - dv\ . 7 dv . dv
(a« -MklP^ + v-^j+pU^ + p^
•5
— V
(dW)-o. k + U P g + P^
(dQ) = e Mk + V l mk
(*s-0
Group 15
6 , mi, t|r constant.
(dp) = - Mk + p
\ dv
(arn k ) = - p- p
dV
dm k
(dv) = — ju k
dv
dp
v ,,dv/ dv
(a£ ) = e ae( Mk “ p am k
\ dv
) P Lk
dp
v , dv \ dv P 7 dv
(an) - ^Mk - ~ 0
dv / dv \
(aO = -MkP^-v^k-P^-J
Ox) = -Mk(pT^ + v- a ||) - p Li
dp
dfl.
dv
dp
dv / dv
^dm k \ dO
(dW)=Mkpg
/, A v _ 1 dv \ dv dv
(dQ) — l Mk P dm J 9 afl P^dp
p, mi, v constant.
dv
dm k
Group 16
180
THERMODYNAMICS
Group 16 (Con.)
(am t ) = %
(dz) =
(dn) =
(Pk + lm k) qq — c p (nil + • • • + m n )
Zmk dv , , | \ Cp dv
~z~ ~ (mi + • • • + m n j —
d dd
6 dm k
, A r \ dv _j_ dv
(30 -M t ^+n —
dv
(d&) = (Mk + Z mk ) ^ ~ ( m i + • • * + m n ) c p
dv
dm k
M)
(dW)
(dQ)
dv . dv
IMk Ve + n d^ k
= 0
, dv . v dv
+ m n ) C p ^
p, mi, e constant.
Group 17
dv
(dd) = — L k + p — Mk
(dm k ) = (mi H-+ m n ) c p - p
dv
dd
(dv) — — (Mk + L k ) ^ + (mi + • • • + m n ) c p
(dn) — — ^ — (mi + • • • + m n ) y
U'k — P
dv
dm k _
(d£) = n l mk + p k
(mi + • • • + m n ) c p - p || + n
— n p
dv
dm k
dv dv
(d&) = — (Mk + l mk ) p -qq + (mi + • • • + m n ) Cp p
TABLE I—FIRST DERIVATIVES
181
Group 17 (Con.)
(difc) = l mk [ n + p ^ J + Mk
(mi + • • • + m n ) c p + n
(nil + * • • + m n ) c p + n
V
dv
dm k
(dW) = (p k + (mi + • + m n ) c pV^~
<9v
(dQ) = — p Imi 00 — (mi + • • • + m n ) c %
Mk — p
dv
dm k .
Group 18
p, m i; n constant.
m = - l f
(dim) = (mi H-+ m n ) -J
\ Imv dv Cp (mi + • • • + m n ) dv
(3v) = 'iw + - I -
(5t) — Jg + ( mi + ’ • • + m n) -g
Mk — p
dv
dm k .
(ac) = \
n Imv + (mi + • • • + m n ) c p n k
(dx) — ~q ( m i + • • • + m n ) Cp ^k
(a« = J
U (n + p a ^j
+ (mi + • • • + m n ) c p ( Mk - p
dv
dm k ,
MW'i = J mkdv (m, + • • ■ + m„) c p dv
y ’ 1 e dd e F dm k
(dQ) = 0
182
THERMODYNAMICS
Group 19
p, mi, < constant.
(dO) = — Mk
(dm k ) = — n
n dv dv
(a y )= —
(dt) =
Mk
dv
(mi H-+ m n ) c p - p — + n
1
e
(mi + • • • + m n ) c p /xk + «l
Wk
(an)
(ajc) = — Mk (mi + • • • + m n ) Cp — n (Z wk + /A k )
0*)
av . av
Mk p + tl p
dd
av
am k
av
Mkp a@ + np ^
(dW)
(dQ) = [(mi • • • -f- m n ) Cp/x k d~ n l m ^\
Group 20
p, mi, 2C constant.
(d6) = — Mk — Imk
(am k ) = (mi + • • • + m n ) c p
av
(av) = — (/Ak + lm k ) + (mi + • • • + m n ) Cp
av
(ae) = (/Ak + Lk) 'Pqq~ ( m i +
(an) = — — (mi + • • • + m n ) Cp /Ak
nZ m k + np
+ m n ) Cp p
av
am k
av
am k
(dO = /Ak [(mi + • • • + m n ) Cp + n] + n ?
mk
dv
(adr) = (/Ak + Imv) l n ( mi + ' * * + m n ) Cp ( /Ak
(dW) = (/A k + L k ) ( mi + ' ’' + m n ) Cp p
(dQ) = — (mi + • • • + m n ) c p /A k
av
am k
v
av
am k >
TABLE I—FIRST DERIVATIVES
183
Group 21
p, mi, tjr constant.
( dd ) = — Mk + p
dV
dm k
(dm k ) = - p Jq - n
dv
dv
(dv) - - Mkgj -
0e) = -
Mk
(mi + • • • + m n ) c p + n
— L k ( n + p +
(nii + • • • + m n ) c p + n
V
dv
dm k
( a «) = - ?
00 = - p
(mi + • • • + m n )
dv . dv
Mk ^ + n toT k j
Mk - p
dv
dm k .
L k / , dv'
0X) = -
Mk
(mi + • • • + m n ) Cp + n + p
dv
dd
^Wk
n + p
dv
dd
+ (mi + ••• + m n ) Cj
dv
(3m k
V
(dW) = p
dv . dv
^Ye + n ^
(dQ) = - (mi + • • • + m n ) c p
Mk — p
dv
dm k _
^w»k ( “I - P
dv
dd,
Group 22
m i7 v, e constant.
. -x , . , V dv n dv dv
(dd) = — 0k + 0 k ) v-0
dp ddd nik
(dp) = 0k + 0 k ) ^ — (mi + • • • + m n ) Cp
184
THERMODYNAMICS
Group 22 (Con.)
, N N av , jdv
(am k ) = (mi + • • • + m n ) c p — + 6
(an) =
(dO =
d6 t
- + m n )c P g+(g
(Mk + L k ) l v 00 + n frp ) +
av
(mi + • • • + m n ) c p — +
+
av
am k
av
nd— - (mi + • • • + m n ) Cp v
d v
($rJ =
m =
(Mk + Lk) ^ — (mi + • • * + ni n ) Cp
(Mk + ^Wk) « ^ + Mk
+<
+ n 0
(mi + • • • + m n ) Cp
av av
av
ap
aaam k
(dW)
(dQ)
= 0
— (mi + • • • + m n ) Cp p. k — — p k 6
Group 23
mi, v, n constant.
m = - h av av av
6~ mt dp d8dm k
(dp) = \ ljy e - («.+ •••+ m„)
(am k ) = - e (m, + • • ■ + m„) c p ^ + (~)
(ae) = Mk [g (mi + " • + m ") c ^ + (^J _
(d() = Mk
(mi + • • • + m n ) Cp av
i, . j \ av /avV . U av
+ V — —
^ d dQ
e
am k _
+ n
L t av . av av
+
_ o dp aaam k _
TABLE I—FIRST DERIVATIVES
185
(dx) = Mk
Group 23 (Con.)
(mi + • • • + m n ) c p dv /dvV
d dp \d 0/ _
(mi + • * • + m n ) c p dv
I ^wt dv
**" d dd
Q
dm k
(dt{r) = Mk
(nil +•••-}- m n ) c p dv /dv\
n
e
l mk dv , dV dV
dp + \d6j _
+
_ddp'~ dd dm k _
(dW) = 0
(dQ) = 0
Group 24
mi, v, £ constant.
<*>--*£+*&
(«p)-*£+•£
(dm k ) = — v
dv
dd
n
dv
dp
(di) = - (/*k + L k ) l
Mk
(mi + • • • + m n ) Cp
dv
dp
+<
dv
dm k
dv
n(9^ - (mi +••• + m n ) Cp v
(dn) = — Pk
(mi + ''' +mn) 7 P £ + (S/ J
_ v —
0 \ as
dv\ dv dv , Cp
+ n d^)~d^ k l n de~ v(m ' + ••• + m ")y
(djc) (Mk "f" Lk) n
dv
dp
Mk
Cp (mi H-+ m n ) ^
+ 0
dv
dv dv
Imit V _
5(9 dm k
+ m n ) Cp v — v n
186
THERMODYNAMICS
m ■■
(dW) =
(dQ) =
mi, v,
m -
(dp) --
(dm k ) =
(de) =
(dn) =
00 =
0
+
n
I
a
I JS
*
So
a
©
> I c
> I e
«®
a
t©
> i s
<©
<©
<©
C
<©>
<©
M
a
a
<©
I<©
>
a
>
<©
!<©
<©
<©
1 ^
l<©
<©
<©
<© 1
a
~i
a
fC
scT
B
N
i
S.
©
a
<©
<©
a
denotes all the component masses; m; all except mk.
270
THERMODYNAMICS
TABLE II-SECOND DERIVATIVES
271
denotes all the component masses; mi all except mk.
Group 5* (Con.)
272
THERMODYNAMICS
oi
a
o
*-
+
>
ft
1
I
ns
1
1_
ns
_1
ns
a
ft
a
a
A
a.