* >~=^l THE UNIVERSITY .: t OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY. Presented by A. A. Pease 1936 Return this book on or before the Latest Date stamped below. A charge is made on all overdue books. University of Illinois Library MAt 1 o ma FEB 19 20 0? t after you got on the cross- ing? A. Yes ; the cab of the engine was about on the cross- ing when I saw. Commissioner Kinaker: Was there anything to hinder you seeing that train before you got onto the crossing? Commissioner Marsh: Any obstruction in the way? A. Well there is a cut on the east. I should think the mouth of the cut was some 900 feet from the crossing on the Burling- ton road. Mr. Sullivan: When you looked before you started your engine was there anything between you and that cross- ing — was the engine in sight? A. No, sir. Q. Describe the grade on the Quincy road between that cut and where the collision occurred at the crossing; is it smooth ? It is down-grade to the crossing. From the mouth of the cut ? Yes, sir. To the crossing ? Yes, sir. Did that engine, after it came out of that cut, stop be- fore it reached the crossing and collided with your train ? A. No, sir. It did not ? No, sir. 1 gave two short whistles before I started the train, after making the stop. You came to a full stop ? I came to a fall stop ; yes, sir. Commissioner Rogers : What crossing do you have reference to — the crossing at Aurora ? A. This crossing is 66 THE GEE AT STEIEE ON THE Q. just about two miles and a quarter south of Fulton Junction, on the Milwaukee road. Q. Where the C, B. & q. crosses ? A. Yes, sir. Commissioner Einaker: How near to the crossing were you when you stopped? Within 400 feet; the cylinder of my engine was just about opposite the stopping board. Q. Go on and describe the accident. You were describ- ing what you did, the signals you gave ; go on an i finish that. A. That was all the signals I did give. Two sharp whistles? Yes ; then I started the train. I didn't see the train till the engine got on the crossing, just about the cab. The "Q" engine struck my tender just about midway of the back truck. Mr. Sullivan : What damage, if you know, w r as done to your train, and to the other, and what injuries to persons ? Commissioner Einaker : The back truck of your engine or tender? A. Of the tender — it tbrowed my tender or the tank down into the ditch ; took the back truck with it, and thro wed the mail car also down the bank ; wrecked the mail car, too; also the "Q"' engine went off the track, and run along ; the engine and baggage car kind of went over, nearly onto one side ; went into the ground and stopped. Q. Was yours a passenger train ? A. Yes, sir. Was the other the " Q" ? Yes, sir. Both passenger trains ? Yes, sir. Who, if anyone, was hurt on your train ? There was a route agent by the name of Wilhelm ; I don't know exactly what his name was. Where does he live, do you know ? Eock Island, I think. An express messenger by the name of Morrison. Do you know where he lived ? I do not. Who else ? A mail agent by the name of Brown. Do you know whether or not anyone was hurt on their train — the Quincy train ? The roadmaster, engineer and con- ductor of the train. That was all that was injured? That was all that was injured. Do you know T their names ? I do not. F. L. Bliss, being recalled, was examined by Mr. Sulli- van, and testified as follows : Q. At what rate of sj^eed did yon pull out after you left THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 67 that 400-foot board— between that and the crossing? A. I pulled out slow ; it would not average over about six or eight miles an hour, anyway. Were you trying to make up for your lost time ? No, sir. Why? We have an order not to make up any time from Fulton Junction to three miles west of Albany. There was an order on the board, and has been there. So that you were not trying to make up time, and were not running at an extraordinary rate of speed ? Not running any faster than though Ave had been right on time. And you think the time you were running between that 400 feet and the crossing was about six to eight miles ? I don't think when we was on the crossing — I don't think it was over eight miles an hour, anyway — six or eight. Mr. Dawes : You rely on your fireman, don't you, to look out for his side ? A. No, sir. Who do you rely on ? I hardly ever go over the crossing without looking myself ; still, he tells me, but I think it is safer to look myself. You looked on your side ? I did. Did you look out on the other side ? I did. Where did you look out last ? Before I started. Before you started from the 400-foot post ? Yes, sir. Did you look out after that at all ? Not after I started on the train until I got on the crossing. The fireman was shoveling in coal, wasn't he — firing up ? Yes, sir. Did you look out of your side of the cab after you left the 400-foot station, down the Burlington track ? Yes, sir ; I looked on my side. How long has that 400-foot post been there, do you know ? The 400 -foot on our track ? Yes. It has been there ever since I have run down there. I have been running about fourteen years on that run. I don't know how much longer it has been there. Mr. Sullivan: That is all. The people that have been injured we could not get. Mr. Dawes: We will admit people were injured. The engineer we shall call was injured more than anybody else. D. W. Rhodes, a witness called on behalf of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, being first duly 68 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. sworn, was examined in chief by "Mr, Dawes, and testified as follows: Q. What is your full name? A. D. W. Rhodes. "What is your business? Superintendent of motive power on the C, B. & Q. road. Are the engineers responsible to you? Through my assistants they are directly responsible to me, But they are immediate employes of your department? They are immediate employes of my department. Of which you are the head? Yes, sir. Do you know Mr. Pearce? Yes, sir. What is his business now, and what was it on the 19th day of March? Mr. Pearce is assistant engineer of tests in our labratory at Aurora. Is he an engineer in the employ of the Burlington road now? He is not a locomotive engineer. Was he ever, at any time, an engineer in the employ of the Burlington road? He was never examined as an engineer for the Burlington road. You say he was not? No, sir; he was not. Where was he sent? He was sent on this Clinton run, from Mendota to Clinton. Do you know about what time that run is made? No, I do not. Was anybody sent with him? He had a pilot, the road- master was his pilot. The roadinaster of that section or division? Yes, sir. I am not very clear about what Mr. Pearce's crew was. I had to take an engine out myself that morning, and I was not at Aurora. Mr. Sullivan: Do ycu know anything about it at all, except from hearsay? Do you know from your own knowl- edge who was on the train? A. From being present, no. Mr. Sullivan: This testimony on that subject should be stricken out. The witness: May I make one correction? I said I took an engine out myself that morning ; I fired an engine out that morning. Cross-examination by Mr. Sullivan: Q. Did Mr. Pearce ever run a locomotive engine before? A. Mr. Pearce had handled a locomotive engine; yes, sir. The question was, did he ever run a locomotive engine THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 69 before? Please answer that? I am not able to say whether he did or not. Are you in the habit, when exercising your best judg- ment to select engineers, to put a man on the road to run a locomotive engine when you don't know whether he has ever run one before or not? In a case like this, where our trains were In any case? We do so; I would do so again. Where the lives of the public and the property of the public are in peril, you will take a man without knowing whether he ever ran an engine before or not, and put him in charge of an engine? No, sir; Mr. Pearce's education and training justified me in believing that he could handle that train properly. Do you believe any technical education in the shops, without practical experience, fits a man to be placed in charge of an engine to which is attached a passenger train? Properly guided by a pilot and conductor on the engine, I say so, decidedly. You would do so at any time? If there had been no strike, you would select a man of that experience, would you? I would only do that under the circumstances as we were. Only under emergencies? Yes, sir. You would not say generally it is a wise thing for a rail- road to do; would you? I would say under circumstances such as we were left in there it was a wise thing for us to do. I ask you generally? If I had time to make a thorough examination of a man I certainly would do it. William H. Pearce, a witness called on behalf of the C, B. & Q. railroad company, being first duly sworn, was exam- ined in chief by Mr. Dawes, and testified as follows: Q. What is your name? A. William H. Pearce. What is your business? Assistant engineer of tests in the C, B. & Q. State under what circumstances you to k this engine on the 27th day of February last? Upon learning of the strike, I, with several other young men, signed a letter to Mr. Rhodes offering to go out in any position which they should deem it advisable. I was detailed by the Master Mechanic to go to Mendota and take that train to Fulton, with the understand- ing that I was to have a pilot; w 7 e struck the train; we had as 70 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. pilot the roadoiaster. We left Mendota five minutes late, and we were about six minutes late when I first see the St. Paul train. How far was that out of Mendota, do you remember? It was somewhere about in the neighborhood of sixty miles. You had lost a minute in sixty miles, had you? Lost a minute in running sixty miles. Who were with you on the engine beside the road- master? When we started out of Mendota there was only Mr. Chapin, the civil engineer of the Chicago Division, and the roadmaster, Mr. Seegers, and a machinist who came from the Aurora shop. After leaving Garden Plain, which is the last stop before arriving at the crossing, the conductor also came on the engine. Were you familiar with that division, had you ever run over it before? No, I never knew it; I never run over it at all. Now state, Mr. Pearce, how this accident occurred. We were going along, I should judge, about forty -five miles an hour. I will preface it by saying that the roadmaster was very careful all the way coming up, and I had no reason what- soever to fear any lack of duty in warning me of any such place; we were going about forty-five miles an hour, and I had to look out for my water; it was getting a little dark; we were going west; of course it cast a shadow and I could not see the water glass; after losing a little time that way I tried my gauge cocks; when I got throngh with that I looked up and I saw this St. Paul train; that is the first intimation I had of the crossing. What did you do then? I shut off and put on the brakes. Right off, did you? Yes, sir. You struck this train as described? I struck a train; yes. Did you do everything in your power to prevent that accident? Yes, sir; I don't see how I could do anything more. Commissioner Rinaker: Tell exactly what you did do? A. I shut off and put the air on. How far were you from the train, in your judgment, when you did that? I should say in the neighborhood of 600 THE GKEAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 71 feet when I saw it, and I would say right here about the speed, that that speed, down grade, would require about a thousand feet to stop; it has been proved by the Burlington tests. Mr. Dawes: What became of you, do you know? A. I only know that from hearsay. I know I was knocked oft' the engine and they got me up; I was leaning against the drivers, they told me, laying up against the drivers; the engine jumped the track, I understand; I don't know; I didn't remem- ber anything until the next morning. Is your sight good — your eyesight? Yes; I think my sight is normal, with my glasses. You can see at a distance, can you, as well as ordinary individuals? I think so. In reference to your hearing? Well, I am hard of hear- ing in a room, but I am not hard of hearing on an engine. Had you received any warning before coming, to this crossing, as far as you remember of it? No. It is fair to say that the roadmaster says he warned you; I say that in justification of him. He says he did. You did not hear any notice; that is what you swear, isn't it? I did not hear him. Are you, in your own judgment, from your education and experience, both in study and on the road, capable of running a locomotive engine? On such a train as that, yes; it is a branch road, and there are comparatively few trains; I would not care about going on a main line. Cross-examination by Mr. Sullivan: Who was the pilot who was furnished you? A Mr. Seegers, the roadmaster. Can you not hear without putting your hand up? I don't wish to be offensive, but I want, as a matter of fact, to find out. Not in that tone. I can hear, yes; but I can hear better by putting it up, as anyone could reasonably argue; probably you can yourself. It is not necessary to do that where there is any noise or confusion going on. - Could you have heard a notice to stop, or a notice that there was a crossing, if Seegers had given it to you? I would have heard as well as any other person. Then you would have heard him if he gave such an order or gave such information? You are very well aware of the fact you have to speak more or less loud on an engine to anyone. 72 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. Did anyone speak more or less loud to you as to notify you that there was a crossing there, and that you should stop 400 feet from it? No. Did you notice the crossing board on the Quincy road? I did not. There is a board 400 feet from that crossing, four or five feet in height? Mr. Dawes: Who says there is a board there? Mr. Sullivan: I will show there is by another witness. Mr. Dawes: There may be, but I have not heard any- body say so yet. Mr Sullivan: How long would it have taken you to bring that train to a fall stop, running at the rate of forty-five miles an hour? When I say how long, I mean in distance; at what space from that crossing should you have attempted to bring it to a full stop iu order to stop it? A. If I knew the crossing? How long would it take a train to stop? It would take in the neighboirhood of 1,000 feet. You could not have stopped it at the rate of speed you were running if you had noticed it at the 400 feet distance? No, sir. When you got out of the cut was any information given to you that it was necessary to stop there? I received no in- formation. The first intimation I had was the sight of the train. Mr. Sullivan: Was there an engineer on the cab with you at the time? Yes, sir. Wasn't that engineer who was en the cab at that time held responsible for it? He was. When you were held responsible for it you never in your life run an engine that length before, did you? No, sir. If you had been working at the engine-house, and there was no such emergency as this, would you have considered yourself competent to do it? Not on a road in which I was entirely unfamiliar. You were entirely unfamiliar with this, were you not? I was entirely unfamiliar. Did you shut off steam before you saw the Milwaukee train? No, sir. How f ar was it from you when you did shut off the steam? Fifty or sixty feet. THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 73 Did you reverse the engine? No, sir, I did not. With a well designed driver-brake there is no benefit in reversing the engine. Did you bring the lever down in front ? No, sir. Did you drop the reverse lever forward when you shut off? I don't remember that particularly. When you put the air on, did you use all that was indicated on your gauge? I naturally should do so. Did you? No, I slapped the air around, put the handle full around ; I didn't stop to see w r hat was indicated on the gauge. Did you use any sand? No. Were quite excited at the time? I suppose I naturally was. You lost your head in fact; isn't that the fact now ? No, because it is stillton my shoulders. You might as well have been without a head; you lost your judgment, didn't you? I don't see that any judgment would come in after having shut the steam off and put the air on. Couldn't you have used sand? I did not. You could have used it if you had thought of it? No, sir; because I didn't see any benefit; as long as the drivers don't slip it is all right. Do you know that sand will help to stop a train quicker? No, sir I don't know it. Do you swear it will not? No, sir, because I have never made any experiment in that. Then you know nothing about it? You don't know whether it would help or not? I have only my judgment, which is formed after quite an elaborate series of experiments on the brakes. John F. Laughlin was examined in chief by Mr. Sullivan, and testified : Q. What is your name? A. John Francis Laughlin. Where do you live? At 818 Washtenaw avenue. What is your business? Switchman, in charge of switch engine. For what road are you working? Chicago, Burlington & Quincy; I was at one time, until I quit. 74 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. Were you employed on the 23d of March for that road? Yes, sir. Why did you quit? Because I did not see fit to work with incompetent engineers. What were you engaged at on the evening of March 23d, and where were you employed? March 23d I did not do much. I only took one train to the Stock Yards and came back. This accident I have reference to happened March 22d, I believe, at 10:30 p. m. What were you doing on the evening of the 22d, and where were you employed? On the evening of the 22d of March I had fifty cars shoving into the new yard at Hawthorne, which is about three miles and a half, as near as I can judge, from Western avenue. We stopped to give me a chance to raise the semaphore for the protection of trains coming east, and also set the switches going into the new yard. I got up and gave the signal to go ahead, and as I did a crash came. What character of train was it that run into yours — a freight? A freight train. What was the condition of the track, so far as obstruc- tions were concerned, between your train and the train which collided with you? There was no obstruction whatever; there was a clear view four miles or three miles and a half; some- thing like that. What time in the evening was it? About half-past ten. Had you a headlight on your engine? Yes, sir. Had you a light on the other end of your train ? No, sir; only my own lamp. You were at that end? And a red light; yes, sir. You had a red light, as well? Yes, sir. Do you know the number of the engine which collided with yours? Yes, sir; 310. What was the number of yours? 176. Was engine 310 flagged? I presume it was, according to my helpers' statement. Your helpers are here, are they? Yes, sir. You had enough helpers to give the necessary flagging? I believe I had: I had two. To how many of these new men did you give signals who were unable to answer or failed to answer the signals? I should say three or four. THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 75 Did you have any conversation with any of them in re- lation to the signals? No, sir; well, I had a conversation with one; I gave him a signal and he says, " I don't understand that signal." Was that signal which you gave him and which he said he did not understand the usual signal given by railroad men? Yes, sir. The same signal which has been used on the road all the time you have been in its employ? Yes, sir. When was that, about what time? That was a couple or three nights before I left. Commissioner Marsh: State what conversation between you and him there at the time he told you he did not under- stand that signal? I merely gave him a signal to back up. He says, "Partner, I don't understand that signal." I merely says to him, "What kind do you understand — steamboat sig- nals?" He says, "No, stationary engines." William G. Frisbie was examined by Mr. Sullivan and testified: Q. Were you on the train to which engine 176 was at- tached? A. I belonged to that crew. At Hawthorne, March 22 I belonged to that crew? Yes, sir. Did you flag 310 that night? I did. State to the Commissioners how far you went from your own engine, 176, to flag 310, the one which collided with it? I can tell you perhaps better by car lengths; I can make a guess at the number of feet. I did not measure it exactly. I should think it was in the neighborhood of 1,500 feet to 2,000 feet that I was back of where our engine stood. I found the train was not coming to a stop, and kept going back myself as long as it was possible, giving them all the swing that it was proper and right to stop him. He paid not the slightest attention to my signal; never even whistled for brakes until after his train passed me. Did you start back as soon as your train stopped to flag? Yes, sir. You went as far as you could? Yes, sir. Re-direct examination by Mr. Sullivan: Q. Did you ever, in all your experience, know a case 76 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. where an engineer was flagged on a clear track, as in this case, and disobeyed a signal and run into another train? No, sir. Stewart W. Hadlock, examined in chief by Mr. Sullivan, testified as follows: Q. What is your name ? A. Stewart W. Hadlock. Where do you reside? At Aurora. What is your business? Eugineer. How long have you been an engineer? Nineteen years. In what company's employ were you recently? C, B. & Q. How long were you in the employ of that company? Twenty-three years. As engineer and fireman? Engineer and fireman both. Do you know Hose De Witt? I do. Do you know in whose employ he now is? He is in the employ of the C. B. & Q. In what capacity? Passenger engineer. Hector H. Hall was examined in chief by Mr. Sullivan, and testified : Q What is your name? A. Hector H. Hall. Where do you live? At Pullman. What is your occupation? Engineer. What company are you working for? Pullman Company. Do you know Hose De Witt? Yes, sir. How long have you known him? About eight years. Is he a sober man? No, sir. What is his general reputation for sobriety? He is an habitual drunkard. Is that the reputation in the neighborhood where he lives? Yes, sir. Have you ever heard it discussed? His wife has been around to all the saloons forbidding them to sell him anything. Why? Because he was an habitual drunkard. When did you see him last? I think it was ',ast Thanks- giving day. What condition was he in then? He was very drunk. Did you ever see him sober? Well, no, sir; very seldom. I have once or twice, probably; as a general thing he was under the influence of liquor. John B Clark, examined in chief by Mr. Sullivan, testi- fied: Q. State your name? A. John B. Clark. THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 77 Where do you live? Aurora. "What is your business? I was a locomotive engineer. How long were you engaged in that capacity? Ten years, probably. For what company were you employed? Chicago, Bur- lington & Quincy. Did you serve on any committee for that road while you "were in its employ? I was on the local examining board for the Chicago division. Do you know Hose De Witt? I do. How long have you known him? About fourteen years, I think. Do you know he was discharged from this company because of his connection with a wreck at Naperville? I do. Do you know what his reputation for sobriety is and has been during all the time of your acquaintance? He was always a hard drinker, when he fired and run here both. Have you known him since he was in the employ of the company; have you seen him since? I have seen him on my way through Piano; he worked at Piano for the Piano Manu- facturing Company, and I see hi'ii tiure about in the neigh- borhood of a year ago; he struck me for a ride to Chicago. Mr. Dawes: I object to any specific instance of drunken- ness a year ago. Mr. Sullivan: Was he drunk or sober? A. He was not sober. Did you ever see him sober? I don't think I did; not what I should call dead sober. You have known him eight years? I have known him fourteen years. Why did you refuse to give him a ride when he applied to you? Well, it was against the rules; and then he was too full of whisky to be a safe man to have around there. You haven't seen him since, then? I have not, except since he came back to work for the C, B. & Q,. Acting as engineer? Yes, sir. Passenger or freight? Passenger. On what road? On the C, B. & Q., on the main line? Mr. Dawes, cross-examining: Did you regard that as a proper method of determining the qualifications of engineers? A. Yes, sir; it is well enough. 78 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. . Is this (handing witness a paper) an accurate copy of the protest of the Brotherhood? I will direct your attention to Article 22. I don't represent the Brotherhood; I am here as a witness. I will ask you whether you know as a matter of fact, Mr. Clark, whether Article 22 is a copy of a grievance presented by the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers to the Burlington road? I did not present it. I understand you did not; you know, do you not? Mr. Sullivan: I object to all this as immaterial. Commissioner Einaker: I do not regard that as cross- examination at present. Is that offered for the purpose of showing that the rule itself was not regarded as a proper one? Mr. Dawes : I want to ask this witness what his opinion is of this particular grievance. Mr. Sullivan: How often have you seen him in eight years? A. He laid around Aurora two or three years before he got a job any place. He lived around Aurora two or three years after he was discharged? Yes, sir. When he hung around Aurora for two or three years did you see him regularly? He hung around a variety saloon that used to be there in Aurora. Commissioner Einaker: How often do you mean we shall understand you are stating you have seen this man drunk in the last eight or ten years? Commissioner Sogers : When was it he wanted to come up with you on the eugine? A. As near as I can remember it was in the neighborhood of a year ago. Commissioner Einaker : How many times have you seen him drunk? A. He was drunk at that time. How many more times? Between the seven years before that? Well, I would not want to say how many times; but at the time he was hanging around Aurora he was off and on. He would go away and hunt for a job and come back, go away and come back; that is the way he was. Was he drunk when you would see him around this vari- ety show? Yes, we very seldom seen him sober. Mr. Sullivan: Prior to this controversy between the railroad and its employes could such a man as De Witt receive THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 79 employment as an engineer; would you have employed such a man? (Objected to by Mr. Dawes.) Q. Would they employ a man who had been dismissed as being responsible for a wreck, as this man was? (Objected to by Mr. Dawes.) Commissioner Rinaker: Do you know why he was dis- charged? A. He was discharged for having a collision about half a mile east of Naperville station. You know that from your own knowledge? Yes; I was mixed up a little bit in it myself. I came near getting into trouble with it myself. Hector H. Hall being recalled, was examined by Com- missioner Eogers, and testified as follows: Q. How long is it since this notice was given by De Witt's wife to the saloon-keepers not to give him liquor? A. I think it was on Thanksgiving day, or the day after. That is last year? Yes, sir. That was on Thanksgiving day? Thanksgiving day or the day after; I am not positive which. J. A. Murray, locomotive engineer of thirteen years' serv- ice, residing at Kock Island, testified that Frank Hamilton, Frank Horn, Joseph Koach, J. Logston, Harry Zimmerman and William Patterson, running engines on the C, B. & Q. R. R., were brakemen, conductors and baggagemen, respectively; that he was acquainted with them all for eight to ten years, and that they were inexperienced as engineers or firemen. Frank Hamilton, witness on behalf of the C, B. & Q. Railroad Company, testified: Q. Give your name in full? A. Frank Hamilton. What is your business? Formerly conductor until the 10th of last month; now I am running an engine. Conductor on the C, B. & Q.? Yes, sir; St. Louis divis- ion. How long have you been a railroad man? For the C, B. & Q. Company, running a train since November, 1880, with the exception of five months, up until the 10th of last month. Have you been examined as to the manipulation of an engine? To a certain extent. By whom? Mr. Wallace. Is Mr. Wallace here? Mr. Wallace is here. 6 80 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. Cross-examination by Mr. Sullivan: Q. You never got any technical instruction as to the running of an engine in your life, did you? A. Explain that word, please. You never got any instruction in the shop from those who manufacture engines and are familiar with their detail? No, sir. You don't understand the meaning of the word technical yourself? I do; yes, sir. "Why do ) r ou want me to explain it? Because I wanted to understand. Witness testified that he had been handling engines off and on ever since he had been on the road. Q. What you mean is you jumped on; would go on when the regular engineer in charge was there? A. Yes, sir. And the fireman in charge was there? I run the engine a certain distance. You were allowed to handle it in their presence, just as many others are allowed? Yes, sir. Do you mean to tell this Commission, on your oath, that in that way you acquired sufficient knowledge to make you a competent engineer? That is the way, from what I understand, to learn to be an engineer. The way they all get to be engi- neers. You say you were examined to some extent. Were you not examined as thoroughly as all other men were examined? I don't know how other men were examined. How did you come to say you were examined to some extent? What do you mean by that? I mean to the extent that I was able to answer the questions. You were only examined to that extent you were able to answer, and you were not examined as to those you were not able to answer? I don't know if there were any questions I was not to answer or not; I answered all the questions. You used that expression, you were examined to some extent. I want to know what you mean by that? I answered all the questions that were asked me. Do you mean to say that all questions were asked you which are equally asked applicants for employment as engi- neers? I do not. THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 81 Was anyone else examined at the same time you were? There was not. Who was present when you were being examined? Any- one but the Board? No; there was not. No one but the Board of Examiners? No. Where were you examined? The principal place was in the building where the general officers are. Were you examined more than once? I was instructed another time. I asked you about examinations? No, sir; not on an engine. How long did your examination take? I could not tell that. How many questions were you asked? I could not say; I did not count them. Have you no idea without counting them? I answered more questions — I asked and answered more questions than was asked me. You examined yourself, practically, did you? The Board was there to hear it. The Board was there to hear you examine yourself— ask- ing questions and answering them? Those I did not thoroughly understand were questions I asked, and then I answered my way, and if I was not right, then I was instructed. And upon that instruction which you got at that time you were employed as an engineer on the road? Oh, no; this is since. How long after that was it before you were put in charge of an engine, since you got this instruction? I took an engine on the 10th of last month, and I run up to yesterday, When was your examination? To-day. You were examined to-day? Yes, sir. Was this the first examination that took place? This is the first. You were not examined before you were put in charge of an engine? No, sir. You were put in charge of an engine without an examina- tion at all? Without auy examination. You were this morning examined, and prepared for be- ing examined here; is that it? No, sir; I don't know as I was prepared at all. I asked questions, and they were answered 82 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. to me. If I could explain them in the language that was used in regard to the management of engines. And that is the first time you have been examined by anybody representing this road as an engineer? Examined on an engine. Did you ever draw pay as an engineer or as a fireman at any time in the employ of this or any other railroad com- pany in the United States before this? As an engineer or fireman? As an engineer or fireman? I did not. Did you ever perform the duties of an engineer or fireman at any time in your life before this date, on any road? That is, to draw pay for it? To draw pay for it, and perform its duties regularly? No, sir. Did you ever put a wick in a headlight? I did. When? The other day. Not until that? That is the first one, but I have fre- quently saw it done. How old are you? I was thirty-four years old on the 16th day of last January. Can you tell what the notches in the quadrant are for? Yes, sir. Please do so? They are to govern the working of an engine. State in what respect they govern the working of an engine? They start from the center and work both ways; the forward and back motions drop the engine down forward and you give her the fall stroke. If you put her back to a less stroke and increase the speed. What do you mean by the stroke? The stroke of the piston that travels in the cylinder. What is the stroke of your engine? I don't know. Has an engine more or less stroke when it is hooked down or hooked up? It has the same stroke, but it receives steam through the ports to a less stroke. In what condition? Both ways; either working in the forward or back motion. What do yon refer to when you speak of receiving more steam? Can you explain that? To a certain extent, yes. To that certain extent please explain it? As the engine .•- THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 83 is working you drop her down and give her full stroke and she is receiving steam at full stroke; as you cut her back she receives steam to a less portion as you cut her back, and then start to travel the other way — the valve it is. Do you know anything about the points of cut-off of a valve on an engine? No, sir. You never got any instruction on that subject? No, sir. You were not examined on it this morning, were you? No, sir. Evidence of a large number of expert engineers and practical railroad men was heard, together with the testimony of the incompetent men. A copy of the entire proceedings is in the hands of Mr. Alex- ander Sullivan, counsel for the Brotherhood. INTER-STATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. The result of the State Board's examination, with a vast amount of new evidence, was prepared to place before the Inter-State Commerce Commission, which had signified its willingness to sit in Chicago May 1, to examine into the charges that the Burling- ton was operating its lines with incompetent men. For some reason never made public the promised inves- tigation was not made. The Brotherhood side of the case was ready, and in the hands of experienced legal counsel; however, no action was taken by the Com- mission. MEETING OF THE STOCKHOLDERS. As the stockholders were to meet on May 16, it was expected that they, having suffered great finan- cial loss from the strike, would take some steps toward bringing about a settlement between the men and the company. It was considered by the strikers that the 84 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. road had not been successfuly operated by the class of men then in its employ, and that self-interest would prompt the stockholders to do justice to their old em- ployes. Contrary to the anticipations of the men, the management was unanimously endorsed at this meet- ing and by this action gave notice that nothing in the line of concessions could be expected. FINAL ACTION . OF THE MEN. Subsequent to this meeting, the Joint Grievance Committee was convened, and it was resolved not to declare the strike off but to continue resistance indef- initely, this action to be subject to the approval of the men. The resolution of the Committee was duly submitted to the men along the line, and a vote was taken as to whether the strike should be declared off or not. The result of the vote was an almost unan- imous expression to continue the strike without abate- ment. After the stockholders' meeting, the men at Chi- cago appointed a day to discuss anew the proposition to declare the strike off. This caused great uneasi- ness along the line, but was only done in order to give those who had not been present at the first vote taken an opportunity to express their sentiments. This discussion, like the preceding one, ended in an unanimous decision to continue the strike. Every effort had been made by the company to break the lines. At Galesburg and other points, it was claimed that large sums of money had been offered to individ- THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 85 uals to break the ranks and again enter the services of the company. Outside of Chicago, the men were subject to all manner of persecutions to compel them to yield to the company's offers, but without effect ; not a single case of weakness was developed after the second week of the strike. ' In Chicago, as before stated, but two men re- turned, one of these, a yardmaster, had been strug- gling under the name of "scab" since "'82" and he was naturally expected to take the course that he did. On the morning of March 23, he was the first yard- master to refuse to do duty as a switchman, and the first and only one to seek reinstatement. At other points along the line, the record is even better than this. Probably not over a dozen men weakened ; from Chicago to Denver , all have stood firm and solid on the ground they first occupied. The following quotation from the Brotherhood circular heretofore alluded to, will be of interest. " THE LOYALTY OF THE STRIKERS. "Just here it is proper to place upon record the fact — luminous in the annals of labor strikes — of the loy- alty of the men, their devotion to principle, and their unexampled faithfulness to their obligations. As one man they responded to the call. So thoroughly im- bued were they with the justice of their cause, that with an unanimity which will forever challenge the admira- tion of manly nien,they surrendered their positions and faced with an unaltering fortitude all the privations incident to a strike, rather than sacrifice their man- hood, their independence and self-respect. 86 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q, "Be it said to the everlasting honor of the engi- neers, firemen and switchmen on the C, B. & Q. sys- tem, that they acted their part nohly from the first to the last. There was no deserters or traitors to the cause ; faithful to their obligations, true to their man- hood, honorable in all their methods, they have digni- fied themselves and glorified the Orders to which they belong, and while courage and fidelity have admirers, they will be remembered for their unyielding purpose by every true knight of the throttle and scoop where- ever the iron horse draws a train." FINANCIAL CONDITION OF THE ROAD. In June the following statement appeared in the Chicago Herald : " The Burlington Company is hav- ing a hard time to make both ends meet. Its statement of net earnings for the month of May, which came to light yesterday, showed a decrease of §803,000, and for the first five months of 1888 the loss compared with the corresponding period last year reaches the astounding total of $4,194,172. Never in the history of Western railroads has such a disastrous record been made by a big railway corporation in so short a time. Less than a year ago the Burlington Company was reported to be the strongest corporation of its kind in the country. It paid the highest rate of dividends, and its securities commanded larger prices than any similar paper on the New York Stock Exchange. Since the beginning of 1888 its dividend rate has been re- duced from eight to four per cent, and even the four per cent has not been earned by many thousand dol- THE GEEAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 87 lars. The interest requirements, winch come ahead of the stock, alone amount to, approximately, $6,000,- 000 per year, or at the rate of $500,000 per month. The net earnings for five months, however, are only a little over $1,000,000, or less than half of what would be required to pay current interest charges. In face of this showing, however, the company has, since the beginning of 1888, paid three per cent in dividends on $77,000,000 stock. This required an expenditure of nearly $2,400,000. If this $2,400,- 000 be deducted from the net earnings of the compan}^ for the first five months of the year an actual deficit of nearly $1,400,000 is left, without allowing anything whatever for interest on bonds, which are always a prior lien. Deducting $2,500,000 interest charges, which somebody must pay, and the deficit is swelled to nearly $4,000,000. To put the matter plainly, the Burlington Company lacks $4,000,000 of being able to pay its debts out of its current earnings. It had a a surplus at the end of last year of $1,000,000, but this has been wiped out, and a floating indebtness of approximately $3,000,000 now stares the Burlington management in the face. It is currently rumored that the company has been trying to negotiate a loan of $2,000,000 in Chicago to help it out of its present dif- ficulties, but these negotiations have fallen through, and it is understood that an effort will be made to raise the money in the East. The depreciation in value of the $77,000,000 stock, of at least one-third, is another serious loss, which will probably never be retrieved." 88 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. THE DYNAMITE PLOT. July 5, J. A. Bowles, Thos. Broderick and J. Q. Wilson were arrested on the train leaving Aurora, at 2:15 p. m., by Deputy Marshal Burchard and Sup- erintendent McGinty of the Pinkerton Agency. A package of some substance, said to be dynamite, was taken from the rack over the seat occupied by Wilson. They were arraigned before United States Commis- sioner Ho}'ne, under section 5353, United States Statutes, which provides a penalty of $1,000 to $10,000 fine for transporting or having in possession dynamite on trains or vessels carrying passengers. Chairman Hoge was sent for, but when he learned the gravity of the charge against the prisoners he had little comfort to give them, but promised to secure an attorney if he found on investigation that their cause was worthy. All three of the men denied ownership of the package found in the rack. Bowles came to Aurora at the beginning of the strike, and ran an engine for thirteen days. His brother finally induced him to leave the service of the company, and he was taken into the Brotherhood Division at Aurora. The Burlington officials testified that Broderick was in their employ as late as April last, two months after the strike began. Wilson was a Pinkerton detective. Thus it will be seen that the trio were Burlington and Pinkerton employes. The company claimed that dynamite was used at Eola, West Aurora, Galesburg and Creston, to blow up and wreck trains, but that no damage was done, except to a portion of a flange on an engine wheel at THE GREai »TRIKE ON THE Q. 89 Eola. In some of these cases a portion of the dyna- mite was found unexploded, together with parts of the wrapper. If this stuff had really been dynamite, it is impossible to conceive how part of the cartridge could have remained unexploded. J. A. Bauereisen, Chief of the Aurora Division of B. of L. E., was arrested July 6 as an accomplice, it having been claimed that Bowles received the package from him before starting for Chicago with Wilson and Broderick. Alexander Smith was arrested July 6. Smith is a fireman, and was charged with having handled the dynamite in connection with the explosion at Eola and West Aurora. Attorneys Bonohue and David were retained for the defense of these men. Chairman Hoge stated that the Brotherhood did not tolerate violence of any kind, aiid would not come to the assistance of any member caught in the act of committing crime. The Brotherhood would look into these cases, and if satisfied that the men were victims of a conspiracy, it would aid and defend them, but if it were shown that they had explosives and meant vio- lence, they would be left to shift for themselves. At this time Mr. Hoge was charged by the Burlington people with having issued a circular April 16, to the various divisions of the Brotherhood, advising that a large number of engineers go to work for the road, and, after disabling as many engines as possible with sal- soda and emory, to quit in a body. Mr. Hoge denies having written this circular, or of having signed it, 90 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. and stated that it was a forgery, if it existed at all. However, Hoge and Chairman Murphy of the firemen were arrested July 10 for conspiracy, and held under the Merrittlawin bonds of $1,500, which was furnished by W. E. Fitzgerald. The complaint alleged that the defendants issued a circular with the fraudulent or ma- licious intent, wrongfully and wickedly to injure the property of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy railroad. The penalty upon conviction is five years in the pen- itentiary or a fine of $2,000, or both. The warrant also contained the names of John J. Kelly and J. H. McGilvery, secretaries to Hoge and Murphy, who were arrested later in the day, but not locked up. Kelly made a statement to the effect that he issued the cir- cular at the dictation of Hoge, and that the latter signed it. It was written with hektograph ink and copied on a hektograph. Kelly also swore that he had been in the employ of Pinkerton for several months, during which time he acted as secretary to Hoge. This man belonged to the Brotherhood of Fire- men, but was running a switch engine on the "Q" in in Chicago, and at the time of the strike was taken into the Brotherhood of Engineers. He is a tall, slender man of twenty- seven or twenty- eight years, blonde, very natty in appearance, small brown mous- tache, light eyes inclined to be deep set, and a clear ringing voice, like the voice of a woman. He was considered of a giddy, frothy nature by his intimates, who were surprised at his ability to keep secret the fact that he was in the employ of Pinkerton. George Godding, an engineer, was arrested in THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 01 Aurora July 9, charged with Bauereisen in violating the United States law in handling dynamite. George Clark, an engineer, was arrested at Gales- burg July 17, charged with the same offense. Dur- ing the examination of these men, Bowles, Smith, Wilson, Kelly and McGilvery appeared with the pro- secution as detectives and informers. Bauereisen was tried, and sentenced to two years imprisonment, at the last term of Kane County Court, at Geneva, 111. He was convicted on the testimony of the informers and Pinkerton men, Bowles, Broder- ick, Smith and Wilson. The weight of evidence was clearly in favor of Bauereisen, but the fact that it w r as a Kane County jury, and that the Burlington Com- pany was the prosecutor, settled the case against him. An appeal for a new trial is now pending. None of the other cases have matured, and prob- ably never will. The general opinion of the strikers, and those who have been particularly interested in these cases, can be summed up in a few words. Knowing that the strike had financially wrecked the property, the man- agment found it necessary to make capital for them- selves, and concluded that a dynamite scheme would answer their purpose. They believed that the Brotherhoods were a law abiding class of citizens, and that they would be dura- founded at the evidence of a dynamite plot, and im- mediately declare the strike otf . That it was originally intended as a bluff is proven by the low grade of dynamite used, which had scarcely the explosive power 92 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. of black powder. The evidence shows that the "Q" employes and the detectives procured and used the stuff without effect. The only evidence against the Brotherhood men was that they had been told by these spies what they were doing ; and while the de- fendants placed no reliance in the story, this knowl- edge was considered sufficient evidence of guilt to hold them as accomplices. This course was probably decided upon when it was found impossible to make them active participants in the crime. In the case of Hoge and Murphy, the web was easier to weave. Having a Pinkerton man as Hoge's secretary, it was a simple matter to put up a fraudu- lent circular, and back it up with the utterances of other confederates who visited him, and sought to in- duce him to resort to violence as a means of compel- ing a settlement of the strike. PROPOSITIONS FOR A SETTLEMENT. J-.ily 14, Mr. Stone sent for Chairmen Hoge and Murphy to talk over a settlement of the strike. Being under bonds, Hoge and Murphy declined to go without then* attorney ; therefore, Mr. iUexander Sulli- van was included in the invitation. They met Mr. Stone at his residence the same evening, but having no author- ity to make a settlement, only a general conversation ensued. Mr. Stone indicated a willingness to take up the schedule and pay as good wages as was paid by the other roads, especially so in the passenger runs. Another meeting was arranged for July 16, at which meeting Messrs. Arthur, Sargent, Sullivan, Hoge and THE GREAT STRIKE OX THE Q. 93 Murphy, on behalf of the men, and Messrs. Stone, Perkins and Dexter, for the company, were present. Mr. Perkins had arrived unexpectedly from Boston, and seemed dissatisfied with the action of Mr. Stone in calling the meeting, and for a time refused to make any concessions. Mr. Stone insisted, and the follow- ingwas drawn up as a basis of settlement by the com- pany : "If the strike be declared off, the company agrees to take back such of the old men as can at present be given employment, and as business increases and more men are needed, thev will be taken from the ranks of the strikers in preference to hiring men who had not previously been in the employ of the company. " The company further agree that those men not so taken back would not be blacklisted, and that those whose previous record had been good would be given letters of recommendation. Mr. Perkins also agreed to rescind the order of J. D. Besler, dated March 25, to the effect that the switchmen would not again be employed by the Burlington company. " That engineers, firemen and switchmen would be treated alike in the matter of re-employment." This was in substance all that the company would concede. As these gentlemen had no author- ity to make any settlement without the consent of the men, it was decided to submit the proposition to them along the entire system, and Messrs. Hoge, Murphy and the writer were appointed to lay the matter before them. Mr. Arthur was opposed to the switchmen being represented on this committee. 94 THE GREAT STRIKE OX THE Q. Before going out on the road, a meeting of the Chicago strikers was held at Curran's Hall. In order to get the matter properly before them, the following resolution was put by the chairman, "Resolved, That the striking engineers, firemen and switchmen do hereby appoint the following Committee to settle the strike : Arthur, Sargent, Alexander Sullivan, Hoge, Murphy and Hall, with the understanding that we will abide by their decision and will accept the above proposition of the company, if no better terms can be obtained by the Committee." Arthur, Sargent and Mr. Sullivan strongly recommended the acceptance of the terms, and sent letters to that effect by the Com- mittee to the men along the line. The resolution was rejected by the Chicago men, and, in fact, by every body of strikers along the entire system. In these terms of settlement nothing was said about dismissing the dynamite cases, it being understood that they would be continued. July 17 the Committee left Chicago to place the proposition before the men, and returned July 27. The strikers everywhere decided to accept no terms that did not include the signing of their schedule and the absolute discharge of all the new men. They con- sidered that the company had asked them to make an unconditional surrender, and that the conspiracy cases had influenced their leaders to side with the company, and they would not now make any settle- ment that was not made by the entire Grievance Committee and include the whole schedule and dis- charge of the new men. Hoge and Murphy knew the THE GREAT STRIKE OX THE Q. 95 temper of the men and knew what the result would be, but felt it their duty to present the propositions as instructed by their chiefs, Arthur and Sargent, and to give the men a complete statement of the condition of the strike, prospects of support, etc. It was a dis- agreeable duty, but they performed it faithfully. Many of the men were inclined to censure the Committee for presuming to offer them such terms. UNION MEETING AT ST. JOE, JULY 24, 1888. The following is the official report : The Chairman stated the purpose of the meeting was to discuss the merits of the C, B. & Q. strike and to try and adopt some plan to bring it to a speedy termination. He also explained and outlined the situation of affairs on the C, B. &, Q. K. E. The Chairman then introduced Bro. G. W. Hitchens, Chairman of the G. G. Com., K. C, Ft. S. & G. E. E., who made a good speech, encouraging the C, B. &, Q.Bros, and saying that he was in favor of the Boycott and Federation. Bro. E. Powers, a member of the B. of E. B., was then introduced, and spoke encouragingly to the C, B. & Q. Bros., telling them to stand firm and they were sure to win. Bro. F. P. Sargent, G. M. of the B. of L. F., was the next speaker. He was in favor of Federation, but did not speak very encouragingly to the C, B. &, Q. Bros, in their struggle for Eight and Justice. Bro. Bailey, of the S. M. A. A., made an able address, which was enthusiastically received. Bro. L. W. Eodgers, of the B. of E. B., and a man who has traveled over the C, B. & Q. E. E. several times, spoke and outlined the condition of the C, B. & Q., and urged the the Bros, to stand firm and they were sure of victory. Speeches were made by Bro. Woi. McClain, of Quincy 4 and a member of the G. G. Com. of the C, B. &, Q.; Bro. Slat- tery, of Butte City, M. T.; J. F. Bryan, of Creston, Iowa; and a great many other Bros, of the different organizations, who nearly all spoke in favor of Federation and said they would 96 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. do all in their power to assist the C, B. & Q. Bros, who are now battling for justice. And they all told the Bros, to never declare the strike off but to fight it to the bitter end. On motion, a committee of nine was appointed to draw up resolutions and adopt a line of action for this meeting. The Chairman appointed the following Committee on Resolutions: W. H. Young, of Div. 307; W. F. Gould, Div. 181; R. Lacy, 105, B. of L. F.; T. J. Hayes, 44, B. of L. F.; L. W. Rodgers, B. of B. B.; T. Slattery, 151, B. of R. B.; F. Wells, Grand Lodge. S. M. A. A.; and T. C. Lyons, No. 9, S. M. A. A. On motion adjourned until 9 o'clock, a. m., July 25, 1888. Second Day. Meeting called to order by F. P. McDonald in the chair. On motion resolutions were ordered read, and each article taken up and adopted or rejected at one time. The following resolutions were read and unanimously adopted, the last article being debated freely: Tcthe Engineers, Firemen, Switchmen and Brakemen, in Union Meeting assembled : We, jour Committee on Resolutions, beg leave to report the following: Resolved, That in regard to the alleged dynamite plot, we denounce all unlawful acts; and that while we believe the accused innocent until proven guilty, yet should any member of our organization be proved guilty of the atrocities charged, we will not only promptly expel them, but be the first to de- mand their punishment. Resolved, That we regard this as a conspiracy by the C, B. & Q. Co. and the Pinkertons, to bring our Order into dis- repute, and turn public opinion and sympathy against us; and we ask the public to withhold their decision until the case has been passed upon by a fair and impartial jury. Resolved, That we thank the managers of this meeting for their vigilance in discovering the company's spy who had been secreted in the opera house to report our proceedings, and that we denounce such dishonorable methods of obtain- ing information. Resolved, That we, the engineers, firemen, switchmen and brakemen represented in this meeting, heartily endorse the plan of federation, and ask our coming conventions to authorize immediate action on this subject. THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 97 Resolved, That this meetiug ask Bros. Hoge and Murphy, or the G. G. Com. of the C, B. & Q., to place on the payroll the names of the trainmen who struck April 1, 1888, and that they receive $40 per month for the time they have been out. Resolved, That each and every delegate at this union meeting be instructed to use every endeavor to have his sub- ordinate Division or Lodge, take such action as will guarantee financial support to our brothers now struggling for their legitimate rights, until such time as the several conventions shall convene, and shall incorporate in their constitutions sucm laws as shall thoroughly unite the several organizations. Resolved, That we return to our respective Divisions and Lodges and notify our constituents to prepare to place a boycott on C, B. & Q. cars as soon as the Chairmen of the several Grievance Committees think it practicable, and we earnestly ask the Chairmen to institute this boycott as soon as in their judgment it can be worked with advantage to our cause. Resolved, That this meeting heartly endorse the action taken by the C, B. & Q. Brothers, in refusing to declare the strike off. All business pertaining to the purpose of the meeting being accomplished, the meeting adjourned at 5:15 p. m., July 25. At a special meeting of the engineers at St. Joe, a plan was formed to call together the Chairmen of all the Grievance Committees in the United States and Canada authorized by the chiefs of the Brotherhoods to meet in St. Louis August 9, 1888. The previous meeting at Kansas City, New York and St Joe were the results of local arrangements, and unauthorized by the chiefs of the Brotherhoods, and their actions were without proper authority, al- though giving expression to the general feelings of the men. A Committee was appointed to visit Chiefs Arthur and Sargent and request them to make an of- ficial call of all the Chairmen of Grievance Commit- 98 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. tees. This was done, and the meeting convened in St. Louis August 9. SECRET MEETING AT ST. LOOS. Chiefs Arthur and Sargent were present. The entire Grievance Committee of the Burlington and the Chairmen of all the other Committees composed the assemblv. All work was done in secret session. Nothing whatever was given to the public. The strike was the only question dealt with at this meeting. Many of the men favored an immediate boycott of "Q" cars and " Q " freight. After two days of dis- cussion, it was agreed that the time and conditions were not such as to warrant a boycott ; it was believed that the road had no business of consequence to be injured. This matter was then laid aside to be taken up in October. Another Committee was appointed to confer with the " Q " officials. This Committee was composed of Chairmen of roads not on strike. The meeting adjourned Saturday, August 11. On Monday, August 13, Alexander Sullivan, Chairman Vrooman of the Union Pacific and his committee had an interview with Vice President Peasley and General Superintendent Besler. The meeting was an informal one. The proposi- tion presented by the Committee was a demand that all the men be taken back in a bodv ; that the former proposition of Mr. Stone, to pay as good wages as his neighbors, be accepted by the Brotherhood. Mr. Peasley stated that he had no power to act in the ab- sence of Manager Stone and President Perkins, but that he would submit the proposition to the.-e officials THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. on their return from the East. He also said that the company desired peace with the Brotherhoods. No action was taken by Messrs. Stone and Perkins ; the only result of the meeting was to strengthen them in their determination to fight the Brotherhoods to the end. All efforts to produce a boycott had failed. The only result of the union meetings held at various points was to convince the strikers that the boycott was not necessary, in fact that they had already won the strike. They continued their meetings, and were just as much out of the way of the company as though they had been locked up for months. In the meantime, and in fact from the beginning of the strike, the company had been moving heaven and earth in their efforts to bring vic- tory out of what seemed hopeless defeat. Starting with an inferior grade of men,they have been constantly weed- ing out the poorer ones as fast as a more competent man appeared who was willing to work for them. A very great number of those originally hired have disappeared and better men have taken their places. Many com- petent men, who had been driven out of the Brother- hoods for dissolute habits, or from prejudice, and who had at first stood aloof fi'om the trouble, had now come forward and entered the service. Beginning on the 27th of February with their business almost wholly destroyed, they have used every means in their power, and have left no stone unturned that promised to increase their traffic. In this they have not been unsuccessful, and their business is today probably as good as any other Western road. In then- 100 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. relation to the strikers, they have outwitted them at every point, and have used with fatal effect every weapon that came to their hand. The truth is that the old employes never had a leader, from the 27th of February until the present day ; they have been under the orders and at the beck and call of this committee and that committee, and have trusted to this chair- man and that chief until they were bewildered, and finally lost. The " Ides of March" was as fatal to them as to Caesar. When the first boycott was lifted, their defeat was absolute and certain; as an evidence of that the action of the self -constituted Advisory Board, in sending road engineers into the yards in Chicago to take the switch engines given up by their brothers at the second boycott, the last of March, should have been deemed ample and sufficient. Any strike, by any body of men, conducted as this one was, would have the same ignominious end- ing. When a class of men are forced into a strike, and their places are filled by men who are allowed to retain them ; when the business interests, interrupted by the strike, are permitted to be resumed, does not such a condition plainly indicate failure? There should be no more great railroad strikes until men, other than those immediately interested, are ready and willing to win them. AT THE CONVENTIONS. At the Firemen's Convention, the promised plan of federation was put forward. Before the firemen jadourned, the switchmen had met in Convention. THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 101 They received and endorsed the plan outlined by the firemen, and appointed a committee of the Grand Of- ficers to act with the engineers and firemen in putting it into execution. Contrary to the expectations of the firemen and switchmen, the engineers at their Con- vention failed to ratify the move toward federation, and had nothing ready to offer in its stead. They did, however, pass a resolution favoring " some means of bringing the organizations closer together." This ac- tion of the engineers was generally understood as a desire upon their part to drop the federation scheme entirely, and much ill feeling has in consequence re- sulted. The striking switchmen naturally felt that the sacrifice made by them had failed to bear fruit, and that the Brotherhood had not redeemed their pledges — nay, more, that they had fallen back into their old position of "refraining from all entangling alliances ' and ignoring the other organizations. Affairs remained in this unsatisfactory condition until the latter part of November. In the meantime, many of the strikers, engineers, firemen and switch- men sought and obtained work on other roads, the Chicago, Santa Fe & California gaining the most of them. ANOTHER COMMITTEE. At the Engineers' Convention, a committee of nine had been appointed, with A. E. Cavener as chair- man, to handle the remains of the "Q " strike. Hoge was retired, or rather had resigned, and the payments to the men were now made through the local divisions of the Brotherhood. Up to November 25, nothing 102 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. had been heard of the committee of nine, and it was not known that they were making any efforts to assist the strikers. It was understood that this committee had been given all the power in the Brotherhood, even to the boycott, if necessary to win the strike. CUTTING OFF THE SWITCHMEN. November 25, letters were received by the chair- man of each local body of strikers, from Cleveland, signed by P. M. Arthur and the Finance Committee of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers. These letters were to the effect, that after the October payment had been made, the switchmen were to be stricken from the payrolls ; that the late Con- vention had made no provision for the further pay- ment of these men. It will be remembered that prior to the switch- men engaging in this strike, an agreement had been made with them that as long as the strike lasted they were to be paid the same wages that were paid to the engineers. A written contract was entered into, a copy of which is now in possession of James L. Mono- ghan. During the different phases of the strike this agreement was frequently mentioned by prominent members of the Brotherhoods, and acknowledged by the Chiefs. At the same time the switchmen were cut off from assistance, the pay of the engineers was raised from $40 to $50 per month. This increase of $10 would have been ample to pay the switchmen. Protests were sent to Cleveland from all over the THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 103 " Q " system. The following is the text in full of the Chicago letter, together with the signatures of engi- neers, firemen and switchmen : Chicago, III., Nov. 24, 1888. Headquarters C, B. & Q, Stkikers. — Curran's Hall. To Messrs. P. M. Arthur, T. S. In graham, H. C. Hayes: Dear Sirs : In receipt of yours of the 22d, we must say that a more sad turn or blow has not struck this body since the beginning of the strike as the decision of that letter. Have we solicited the friendly hand of our fellow switchmen the past eight months, have we sustained brotherly feeling and fought the common enemy all summer hand in hand, only to throw our participants broadcast over the land after proving themselves loyal to us and men of their word? Do we have to bring disgrace upon ourselves, by being connected with such unmanly actions, and involve thereby bitter an- tagonistic feelings in the future? We engineers went out with grievances, where the switchmen had none, but sym- pathy only; would it not be more justice to cut us off and pay these men for their manly actions? After the return of the regular delegates from the Con- vention, information was communicated to us of their firm understanding that the treatment of the engineers and switch- men would be the same in the future as in the past. In regard to dividing our $4Qper month with the switch- men in the future, we can only refer to figures; about thirty to thirty-one engineers against sixty-five switchmen [in Chi- cago — Author] , both parties in debt more or less for the nec- essaries of life for the eight months, winter at hand, and our men badly in need. Some provision must be made! How in the name of God can we share with others, having scarcely enough for ourselves? The future prosperity of our Order undoubtedly depends upon the just action taken in this C, B. & Q. struggle. How can we expect to gain and retain the kindly feeling of mem- bers of other organizations relative to us in railway service by practicing acts of injustice and partiality in our own midst? Look at the switchmen at this point. When employed, their salary ranges from $75 to $90 per month. They have stepped 104 THE GREAT STRIKE OX THE Q. down for principle's sake, and not for the $40 per month, barely sufficient at this point to keep soul and body together. Now, at this great Convention it has been overlooked to provide for these men who fought the battle according to instructions. Only a portion of the men being thought of, and the balance of them — those who sacrificed all for principle and friendship — have been thrown out into the world without any previous notice whatever. Here we are today to fight our own battle. Kather than being sacrificed and deserted in this style, we will accept previous favorable offers at Chicago, saving at least this point, although at the sad experience of broken prom- ises. Indeed, sad it is for men to fight honorably, and with whole soul, only to find out, after losing all, that they are cut off from ammunition! Now then, left without ammunition, what is left for the soldier to do — surrender or be cut down? Our course in this depends on speedy action, and we there- fore demand immediate answer from your Grand Lodge, stating decidedly the future treatment. Shall it continue as before, or shall it be cut off? As our men are radical, we ask you to answer by telegraph, up to 2 p. m.. Monday, November 26, "Yes" or "No." If no answer is received up to this time it will be considered by this body a negative answer, and copies of this will be sent to all subordinate divisions and lodges of the Big Four organizations. Yours fraternally, [Signed] T. J. Tterney, M. Shields, M. T. Mahoney, John A. Hienish, J. Kyan, David Bain, Engineers. Switchmen. The answer came by mail, and reads as follows : Office of the Grand Division Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Cleveland, Nov. 26, 1888. M. T. Mahoney: Dear Sir and Brother: Yours of the 24th at hand, and in reply thereto we sent a check Saturday, to jjay the engi- neers and switchmen alike for October. After that time we can pay nothing for the switchmen. You seem to think that the power is vested in the Grand Officers to levy assessments for the support of the switchmen; but such is not the case. THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 105 We can only act as directed by the Convention. The Conven- tion directed that an assessment be levied for the support of the engineers at $50 per month, and that is as far as we can act. Yours fraternally, [Signed] T. S. Ingkaham, F. G. A. E. Previous to these letters, the Chairman of the switchmen had written to Cleveland to make inquiry about the October pay. The answer to his letter is also herewith given : Cleveland, O., Nov., 22, 1888. •/. A. Hienish, Esq.: In reply to yours of 18th, I can only say that, although the Grand Chief was particular to call attention to the fact that no provision was made for October payroll, no steps were taken to supply that want, and all that we can do is to for- ward the amounts as fast as money comes in on donations, which is very slow, and with October payroll all payments to switchmen and brakemen will cease, as the further assess- ment was levied to pay engineers only. We have, however, advised the engineers to share what they receive with the switchmen. Whether or not they will do it, they can answer. We shall send a draft today to pay the men at Chicago, both en- gineers and switchmen for October, and to other points as fast as we can get the money, which is the best we can do. Yours truly, [Signed] T. S. Ingkaham, F. G. A. E. Letters were sent by the strikers to all the Broth- erhood Divisions throughout the western country, noti- fying them of the arbitrary action of the officers and telling them the condition of the men. No word had been received from Chairman Cave- ner or his committee of nine until after the 9th of December, when the switchmen of Chicago declared the strike off, as far as concerned themselves. This 106 THE GEE AT STRIKE ON THE Q. action was taken with the consent and advice of the Grand Master of the Association, and letters were sent to the switchmen along the line of road, advising them to take the same action and make any terms that they were able to make with the company. The striking engineers and firemen at Chicago also advised this course and even offered to unite with the switchmen in following it out. The switchmen along the line, acting on the ad- vice of the Brotherhood men, refused to recognize the strike as off, and remained with the engineers, but without aid from the Brotherhood, as seen from the letters herewith given. December 11, Mr. Cavener arrived in Chicago, and on the 28th of December representatives of the Brotherhood from west of the Missouri river assembled in Chicago to the number of two hundred. They were called together by Mr. Cavener to take final action on the strike. From the 28th day of December to the 4th day of January, the daily papers were full of sensational rumors of boycotts, but no such action was contem- plated by the Brotherhoods. Below is given the full report of the settlement, issued from the Grand Lodge of the Switchmen's Mutual Aid Association. OFFICE OF THE GRAND LODGE. SWITCHMEN'S MUTUAL AID ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA. Chicago, III., Jan. 10, 1889. To All Subordinate Lodges: Sirs and Brothers: At the late Convention of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, held at Pdchniond, Va , a Committee of nine was appointed to examine into the THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 107 condition of the strike on the C, B. & Q. Railroad, and devise ways and means whereby it might be brought to a close. The Committee was composed of the following named gentlemen: A. R. Cavener, A. YV. Perley, T. Hollinrake, Thos. Humphreys, A. Le May, A. W. Logan, Edward Kent, Wm. C. Hayes and T. P. Bellows. After the Committee had made a thorough in- vestigation, they requested the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen to appoint a Committee to act in conjunction with with them, and Grand Master Sargent appointed L. Mooney and S. W. Dixon as such Committee. This Joint Com- mittee, in their report to the two Brotherhoods, say: An interview with the officials of the C, B. & Q. company was solicited and granted. Other interviews followed, in which the strike, in all its details was discussed, with a thorough ap- preciation of the gravity and importance of the situation. The Committee sought by all the means at its command to secure a settlement that would be of the largest possible ad- vantage to the strikers. Every point was brought out and thoroughly discussed, and after a careful, patient and ex- haustive review of the situation, a settlement was effected which met with the unanimous approval of the Joint Committee. Prehminary to our report of the settlement, we desire to introduce the following documents, which are self-explan- atory: Chicago, Jan. 4, 1889. Mr. E. P. Ripley, General Manager, Chicago : Dear Sir: The enclosed is a copy of the communica- tion which I was directed to give to the Committee of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen, who have been in conference with us today, which was accepted by them, and they have declared the strike settled. lb is important that no question should arise as to the good faith of the company, and it is our desire and intention that there should be no opportunity for such question. As to the meaning of the word "available," I desire to say that when it becomes necessary to employ men outside of those now in the service, care must be taken to consider all the qualifications that go to make up availability, including experience and familiarity with our surroundings and rules. In short, that the very best men are to be selected, regardless of personal relations or prejudices for or against any men or class of men. It should be further fully understood that the company does not desire to pursue those who have been guilty of im- proper conduct during the late strike, and while such men 108 THE GREAT STRIKE OX THE Q. cannot be re-employed, and while we cannot give letters to them, no officer or employe .should continue the animosities of the conflict after it is over, or interfere to prevent the em- ployment of such men elsewhere. Yours truly, Henry B. Stone. Similar letters will be sent to all the officers in charge of our different properties, and by them transmitted to their operating officers. H. B. Stone. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Boston, Jan. 3, 1889. To Henry B. Stone, Vice President C, B. & Q.Rij., Chicago: I did not telegraph yesterday, as you requested, because it seemed important under the circumstances, and since we have been asked by the engineers to say what our position is, that it should be done with the authority of the whole Execu- tive Committee. The Committee is now in session, and I am authorized and instructed to send you the following: "The company will not follow up, black list, or in any manner attempt to proscribe those who were concerned in the strike, but, on the contrary, will cheerfully give to all who have not been guilty of violence, or other improper conduct, letters of introduction, showing their record in our service, and will, in all proper ways, assist them in finding employment. "The first duty of the management is to those who are in the company's employ, and we must remember, and protect their interests by promotions, and by every other means in our power. Beyond this, if it should become necessary to go out- side of the service for men in any capacity, it is our intention to select the best men available, and in making selections, not to exclude those who were engaged in the strike of February 27, if they are the best men available, and provided they have not since been guilty of violence and other improper conduct." You are authorized to give a copy of this message to the engineers who called upon you. [Signed] C. E. Perkins. Chicago, Jan. 4, 1889. Mr. A. R. Cavener, Chairman Committee Brotherhood Locomo- tive Engineers : Dear Sir: The above is a copy of a telegram received yesterday from Mr. Perkins, our President, and which, in ac- cordance with his instructions, I have submitted to you, and which has been fully discussed with you and your Committee. Yours truly, Henry B. Stone. Chicago, Jan. 4, 1889. Mr. Henry B. Stone, Second Vice President: Dear Sir: We, the undersigned Committee, in behalf of our respective organizations — Brotherhood of Locomotive En- THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 109 gineers and Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen— and as rep- resentatives of the ex-employes of the Burlington system, who left the services of said company February 27, ] 888, or later, on account of the strike, approve of the foregoing agreement, and hereby declare the strike of the said ex-employes as set- tled. Yours truly, Alex. R. Cayenee, Wm. C. Hates, A. W. Pekley, A. W. Logan, T. HOLLINRAKE, EDW. KENT, Thos. Humphreys, T. P. Bellows, A. Le May, S. W. Dixon, L. Mooney. The Joint Committee submitted their report to the Grand Officers of the B. of L. E. and B. of L. F., and the set- tlement "met with their entire and unqualified approval." The Grand Officers, therefore, issued a circular to their re- spective Divisions and Lodges, under date of January 7, 1889, in which they say 'The strike of the Brotherhood of Locomo- tive Engineers and Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen on the C, B. & Q. railway system, inaugurated February 27, 1888, is hereby officially declared at an end, and the striking em- ployes are now at liberty to make applications for situations on said system." The purpose of this circular is to advise the striking switchmen who desire to be re-employed, to file their appli- cations at their respective Division headquarters, on or before February 1, 1889. This advice is given at the request of the officials of the company. Applications filed after February 1 will not be considered. The settlement may not be all that might be expected or desired, but it seems to be the best that could be secured under the condition of things, and I hope it will be received in good faith, and that all hostility will cease. In closing, I urge upon switchmen, members of our As- sociation, to exert their influence in securing situations for the ex-employes of the C, B. & Q. system. Yours fraternally, Feank Sweeney, Grand Master S. M. A. A. of N. A. The letters herein printed are given without comment, further than to say that as they seem to 110 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. have some bearing on the settlement, they were evi- dently intended for that purpose. The business of the Burlington, as with the other western roads at this time, is but little over half its usual volume. No switchmen, engineers or firemen returned to the employ of that company during Jan- uary. Advices from along the entire system indicate the same condition of affairs at the present date, Feb- ruary 8, 1889. The new men, laid off on account of dull business, still remain on hand, and as business increases they will return to work, and not until their ranks are exhausted will there beany vacancies for the old men. The probabilities are, that several months will elapse before any of the strikers will be needed by the Burlington road. The following letters having been made public by the Grand Officers of the firemen, through the medium of their magazine, we violate no confidence in giving them publicity here. We particularly desire to print them, from the fact that they indicate a condition of affairs in relation to the settlement that should be made known to the general public. The letters and comments are from the Februarv, 1889, number of the Firemen's Magazine. " The B. of L. E., at its Bichmond Convention, not only declined to repeal laws, the enactment of which was an indignity of such unquestioned insolence, that ' a wayfaring man though a fool ' need not err in comprehending the outrage, but in its deliberations relating to ending the C, B. & Q. strike, it concluded to ignore the B. of L. F. entirely, as if the Order had THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. Ill no interests at stake and was unworthy of notice. In proof of this we introduce here an extract of a letter from P. M. Arthur, Grand Chief, dated November 5, 1888, which is conclusive: " The Convention also decided to appoint a Committee of nine, with Bro. Alex. Cavener as chairman, to determine when the strike shall end on the C.,B. & Q. Bro. Cavener will first go over that system, and see how the situation is, and address the men at the different places on the line, in view of a settlement. After which he will convene his Committee and they are to decide when the trouble shall end, and no one but themselves is to knoiv the result until they report to the Grand Officers. "We have italicised certain expressions in Grand Chief Arthur's letter to Grand Master Sargent, to enable our readers to see how effectually the B. of L. F. was squelched, left out in the cold, disregarded and tabooed by the B. of L. E. in the 'settlement' of the strike. " In reply to Grand Chief Arthur's letter of No- vember 5, we here introduce extracts from Grand Master Sargent's letter of November 7 : P. M. Arthur, Esq. : Dear Sir and Brother: I am in receipt of your com- munication of November 5, written by S. G. E. Bro. Everett, and I have noted its contents carefully and I must acknowledge that I am disappointed in the action taken at Richmond on the question of federation. Referring to the strike, I had hoped that your Conven- tion would end it, believing as I do that it is a useless waste of time and money to continue it any longer. We are already feeling the strain ourselves; my mail is continually filled with communications coming from the officers of the Subordi- nate Lodges, appealing to me in behalf of their members to excuse them from paying the heavy assessments which we 8 112 THE GEE AT STRIKE OX THE Q. have been compelled to levy. Others are prepared to sur- nder their charters, and the situation is anything but agree- able to me. There can be no change, however, until such time as the strike is declared off. And we will be compelled to contribute to the support of these men for a longtime after, - many of them will be without situations. "Whatever may be the decision of the Committee which you have appointed. I hope that they will bear in mind that the Brotherhood of Lo- motive Firemen are just as much interested in this strike is the Brotherhood of tocomotive Engineers and that they will also consider this claim, that the members of the Broth- erhood of Firemen are not all wealthy men. "In reply to Grand Master Sargent's letter of the 7ifc Grant Chief Arthur writes as follows, under date of November 9 : In regard to the strike we are deeply sensible of the cir- cumstances by which you are surrounded, and nothing could have been further from our thought than to ignore you or your Brotherhood, but in view of the fact that your Convention adjourned without action touchiDg that matter, and as you had expressed a hope that our Convention should declare it off, it was deemed wise to take steps to fix a time to end it without giving any aid or comfort to the company. This is what was kept in view and the welfare of the fire- men in it was as much an object as was that of tUe engineers, and when the Committee reports you will be fully informed of the course decided upon. "We are not disposed to indulge in severity of lan- guage in criticising Grand Chief Arthur's letter to Grand Master Sargent, of November 9. It is easily en that Mr. Arthur was not only 'deeply sensible' of the circumstances which 'surrounded' the B. of L. F., but was quite as -Jet- ply sensible' that the circumstances 'which surrounded' the B. of L. E. were of character which he found it exceedingly difficult to explain. When the B. of L. E. deliberately 'ignored' the B. of THE GREAT STRIKE OX THE Q. 113 L. F., giving it a direct slap in the face in a matter in which the interests of its members were vitally in- volved, the declarations of the Grand Chief 'that nothing could have been further from our thoughts than to ignore you or your Brotherhood,' the very climax of irony is reached. Look at it : here were two great Brotherhoods engaged in a life and death struggle with a powerful corporation. It had cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars. Firemen, with a fidelity bom of heroism worthy of monuments of marble, had stood by the engineers until they were impoverished. At this supreme juncture, the B. of L. E. concludes to take steps to terminate the strike. Does it consider the interc — . :he rights, the sacrirk - of the B. of L. F.'? No, not in the least. There is no word, no sign of recognition. On the contrary the action of the B. of L. E. is that of the most offensive ostracism. There is not so much as a squint at co- operation or federation. The gush and slush about the 'twin Brotherhoods' disappears, and yet Grand Chief Arthur declares, as if he expected his assertion would be accepted as true, that in the appointment of a Com- mittee of nine, clothed with full power to settle the strike, in which no reference was made to the B. of L. F. or to its interests, 'nothing could have been further from our thought than to ignore' the B. of L. F. It is sufficient to say that the declaration of Grand Chief Arthur was not accepted as conclusive. It is neither an apology nor an explanation. Indeed.it only serves to emphasize the fact that the B. of L. E. deliberately and purposely ignored the B. of L. P. 114 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. "Proceeding with the history, it will be seen that Mr. Alexander E. Cavener, Chairman of the Committee of nine engineers, proceeded to carry out his instruc- tions. He went over the roads of the ' Q ' system, he held meetings and obtained information. He as- sembled his Committee of engineers and made his reports. The conclusion was to declare the strike at an end. In all of this no fireman had been consulted — no attention paid to the B. of L. F. officers or men. There had been neither co-operation nor federation — no allusion to the 'twin (?) Brotherhoods.' "At this juncture, Mr. Alexander B. Cavener, Chairman of the Committee of nine, bethought him- self of the fact that there was such a Brotherhood as the B. of L. F. The B. of L. E. had not authorized him to indulge such a thought, but he did remember it and sent the following telegram : Chicago, Dec. 27, 1888. Sargent and Debs: Can you select a Committee of your Order to act in con- junction with our Committee? Meet us at Commercial Hotel morning of December 29. [Signed] Alex. R. Cavener. " This was the first intimation the B. of L. F. had that the B. of L. E., or the Committee of nine, recog- nized that the B. of L. F. had any interest whatever in the ' Q ' strike, or in the settlement of the strike. Grand Master Sargent was not in Terre Haute when the message was received, and Grand Secretary and Treasurer Debs, of the B. of L. F., replied as follows : Terre Haute, Ind., Dec. 27, 1888. Grand Master Sargent is expected home from the East this evening, and your message will be referred to him on his THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 115 arrival. For myself I do not favor the appointment of a Com- mittee such as you suggest at this time. The invitation for joint procedure comes too late in the day. I have no doubt our regular Committee representing the C. B. & Q., now at Chicago, will be amply able to look after our interests. E. V. Debs. '•'Upon the arrival of Grand Master Sargent the following message was sent to Chairman Cavener, at Chicago : Terre Haute, Ind., Dec. 29, 1888. A. R. Cavener, Commercial Hotel, Chicago, III.: Keferring to your telegram we have to say, that in our opinion we should have been given an opportunity of being represented in the tour of inspection of the " Q" system. We are in the habit of acting for ourselves in such matters, and hence we are not disposed at this late hour to join in the "amen" to what has been done. If we were not capable of doing our part from the beginning we are not willing to join issues now. We respectfully decline to appoint any Commit- tee for the purpose suggested in your telegram. [Signed] F. P. Sargent, Grand Master. E. V. Debs, Grand Sec. & Treas. " The refusal of the B. of L. F. to appoint a Com- mittee to act with the engineers' Committee was ad- versely criticised, and resulted in sending to Terre Haute a Committee of two, Bro. E. H. Lacy, Chairman of the C, B. & Q. Committee, having charge of strike affairs, and Bro. George Godding. These men visited Terre Haute, and, acting under advice, represented to Grand Master Sargent that it was important that a Committee should be appointed to represent the fire- men on the Committee of engineers. X D J 116 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. " Grand Master Sargent thereupon transmitted to Grand Chief Arthur the following message : Terre Haute, Ind., Jan. 2, 1889. P. M. Arthur, Cleveland, Ohio: I have been requested by A. R. Cavener, Chairman of Committee at Chicago, to appoint a Committee of firemen to act with them in the matter now before them. Will you in- form me if he has the authority to do this, and if you approve of the same as the Executive of the Order? Has this Com- mittee full power to act regardless of you? Answer at my expense. [Signed] F. P. Sargent, Grand Master. " In response to the foregoing, the following reply was received from Grand Chief Arthur: Cleveland, O., Jan. 2, 1889. Frank P. Sargent : Would advise you to grant Cavener's request in the in- terest of peace and harmony. He has not complied with my instructions, but I waive all in favor of having an end put to the strike. P. M. Arthur. " Upon receipt of this message, Grand Master Sar- gent appointed Bros. S. W. Dixon, of Baraboo, Wis., and L. Mooney, of St. Joe, Mo., a Committee to repre- sent the B. of L. F.'s interests, as set forth in the fol-' lowing communication addressed to Chairman Cavener of the B. of L.E. Committee under date of January 2 : Grand Lodge j Brotherhood or Locomotive Firemen. >■ Terre Haute, Ind., Jan. 2, 1889. ) A. R. Cavener, Esq., and members of the Committee representing the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and the inter- ests of the C, B. & Q. engineers engaged in the present strike: Gentlemen and Brothers: It is not necessary for me to introduce myself to you honorable gentlemen, as I am, no doubt, known to you both officially and socially, and I will THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 117 proceed fro place before you certain facts, and at the same time explain to you the reason of my forwarding the message to Bro. Cavener, Chairman of your Committee, signed jointly by Bro. Debs and myself, in reply to a request made by Bro. Cavener for us to appoint a Committee representing the fire- men to go with you before the officials of the Burlington system. I desire to trespass upon your valuable time long enough to call your attention to the original compact entered into between the engineers and firemen in the beginning of this eventful strike. It was understood that in all our dealings both as Committees and as executive officers among ourselves, or when before the officers of the company, that we should act together. I am not disposed at this time to pass any criti- cism whatever upon the action of the Brotherhood of Loco- motive Engineers or upon any of its executive officers; I simply wish to call attention to this matter in a fair and unbiased light. "When our Convention convened at Atlanta, the situa- tion of the Brotherhood was not of an encouraging nature; we were incumbered with debt; we knew that we could not as a body, take any action in the matter of the strike, except to provide means for the maintenance of the men engaged there- in, until such time as the Convention of your honorable body had convened and decided upon what they believed to be the best course to pursue. We provided means for the further sustenance of our men and awaited the action of your body. Being honored with an invitation to be present in Richmond as a guest of your Brotherhood, I was able to meet with many of the prominent members, together with the Grand Officers, and I presented, when the opportunity offered, my exact position as an Executive Official, stating, that we, as an organization, Avere willing, at all times to do anything that was honorable toward bringing about a satisfactory set- tlement of the difficulty. I was assured that some action would be taken whereby some means would be devised which would lead to the ending of the strike. I returned home, and shortly after the termination of your Convention, I received an official communication from Grand Chief Arthur, in which he informed me that a Committee of nine had been appointed with Bro. Alex. R. Cavener as Chairman, to determine when the strike should end on the C, B. & Q.; that Bro. Cavener should 118 THE GREAT- STRIKE ON THE Q. first go over the system and see what the situation was, and address the men at different places along the line in view of a settlement; after which he would convene the Committee, and they were to decide when the trouble should end, and no one but themselves was to know the result until after re- porting to the Grand Office. I immediately wrote a letter to Grand Chief Arthur, in which I expressed a feeling of dissat- isfaction on account of the firemen not being requested to to appoint members of the organization to represent them; I believed that if there was a representative of the engineers organization going over the system that there should also be a representative of the firemen accompanying him. I may have been wrong in my view, still I have seen nothing yet to change my opinion. In reply to my letter to Grand Chief Arthur, he stated that it was not the intention to ignore us in any manner, but as I had expressed the hope that his Con- vention would devise the means of ending the strike, it was deemed wise to take steps and fix a time to end it without giving any aid or comfort to the company. He further stated that the firemen and their welfare were kept in view, and that when the Committee made its report that I would be fully in- formed of the course decided upon, no intimation being made, however, that I was at liberty to appoint any firemen to go in conjunction with the Committee of engineers. While the com- munication did not just meet my views, I said to my associate, " We will await the report of this Committee." A few days after I visited Cleveland and had a conversation with Grand Chief Arthur, in which I again broached this matter, and was again informed by him that it was no intention on the part of the Convention to ignore the firemen and that our interests were considered equally with theirs. He furthermore informed me regarding the authority delegated to the Committee, and led me to believe that all you could do was simply to assem- bly receive the report of Bro. Cavener, and then recommend what further action should be taken by the Grand Officers when we should convene as Grand Officers and decide the issue. A few days after this I was present in the city of St. Paul, and had a pleasant interview with Bro. Hayes, who is, I believe, a member of your Committee. I expressed to Bro. Hayes my opinion, and I desire to say I found him exceedingly courteous, and he coincided with my views, saying it was all THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 119 due to an oversight and that lie would communicate with Grand Chief Arthur on the subject. I stated to Bro. Hayes that if Grand Chief Arthur requested of me the appointment of a Committee, I would gladly do so; nothing more was heard of the matter. I was receiving communications daily from all sections of the country, asking why the firemen were not represented on this Committee; such communications I answered in as honorable a manner as I knew how, placing no censure upon any one and saying nothing that would in any manner, lead intelligent men to think we had any desire to antagonize. In my absence from the city Bro. Debs received a tele- gram from Bro. Cavener, requesting us to appoint a com- mittee. Bro. Debs answered the message, expressing his sentiments, not for the purpose of creating ill-feeling, but simply to place us and our Order before the Committee in an honorable light. Upon my return the message was submitted to me, and in view of the fact that throughout this entire strike we have acted jointly, believing that we should have been requested to make appointments on that Committee of engineers, and in view of the further fact that at the time of learning officially of the action of the Committee, I wrote to Grand Chief Arthur, calling his attention to my feelings and afterward in my conversation with Brother Hayes, in which I gave him to understand that if Grand Chief Arthur would re- quest of me the appointing of a Committee that I would gladly do so. I believer, as did Bro. Debs, that it was entirely wrong to ask us to send a Committee to go before the officers of the company after the Committee's work in a large measure had been accomplished. When I say "Committee's work" I refer to the Chairman, who had been over the system interviewing men and observing the situation while we were not represent- ed nor even requested to be; and for this reason our mes- sage was sent. This morning a Committee of two of the Gen- eral Committee representing the firemen on the C, B. & Q.K. R. presented the position you occupy and authority delegated to you by your Grand Body. After a careful consideration of the matter and a desire to bring about an amicable settlement of the present difficulty, create harmony and good will be- tween all labor organizations, especially our co-workers, the engineers, we have wired the following message to Grand 120 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. Chief Arthur: "I have been requested by A. K. Cavener, Chairman of Committee at Chicago, to appoint a committee of firemen to act with others in the matter now before them. Will you inform me if he has the authority to do this and if you approve of the same as the Executive of the Order? Has this Committee fall power to act regardless of you? Answer at my expense." Considering the correspondence and conversation we have had on this subject with Grand Chief Arthur, it is no more than right that he should, as an executive of the organ- ization he represents, endorse the appointing of a Committee representing the firemen, to take part in these deliberations. Upon receiving his reply, if he endorses your request, I shall immediately instruct two members of our Order, who are in- telligent, capable and somewhat familiar with the situation, to report to you at once. lean assure you that whatever you decide upon doing, these representatives will acquiesce in so long as it is to the interests of the organizations involved. I am sorry that there should be any misunderstanding on account of this matter, but I think time will demonstrate to intelligent, thinking minds that the position taken by the Grand Officers of the B. of L. F. has been an honorable one, and all we ask is that consideration which all honest men are entitled to. We may differ in opinion, but that we have a right to do, and when it comes to a matter of such grave im- portance as the one that now presents itself for our consider- ation, we should set aside all personal feeling;; and act to the best interests of those we represent. I can assure you, gentlemen, that you have the best wishes of the Grand Officers of the Brotherhood of Locomo- tive Firemen, and we only trust that through your delibera- tions may come such good results as will redound in honor to yourselves as well as to the organization which you repre- sent. Yours fraternally, F. P. Sabgent. "In this connection it becomes necessary to state that among other things charged in support of the allegations that the B. of L. F. is responsible for the failure of the strike, is a letter written by Grand THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 121 Master Sargent in reply to a letter received from Bro. J. E. Kline, of Plattsmouth, Neb. As special efforts have been made to misrepresent Grand Master Sargent in the matter, we here give the full text of the corres- pondence : Plattsmouth, Neb., Dec. 6, 1888. F. P. Sargent, Esq., Grand Master : Dear Sir and Brother : Yours of recent date to Bro. Zinn was referred to me, and I was requested to ask for in- formation. Since you cannot assure us our support after No- vember, can you give us any encouragement in regard to the Committee of nine, with Cavener at the head, which was ap- pointed at the late Engineers' Convention? We have been notified that they would put on the boycott, which I think is the only means to win this fight. I am very much afraid that this strike is lost, and that we (the men on the Q.) are sac- rificed. I have been a Brotherhood fireman about two years, and have done everything in my power to promote the Order, and I have always thought that nothing could break our or- ganization, but I am afraid if this strike is lost, that we fall beneath the heels of capital; yet I am satisfied that some move can be made by our Order to crush the C, B. & Q. into submission. Now, in regard to some of the strikers refusing employment on other roads, preferring to lay idle on the forty ($40) dollars paid us for so doing, I think is false, and I am satisfied I can convince your informant. In the first place, well do you know that there are many roads that want men, but refuse to employ C, B. & Q. strikers, until the strike is declared off. Furthermore, we have men working on all the roads in the country that will employ strikers. I am sorry that those men who are being expelled for non-payment, can- not see that it is to their benefit to sacrifice a few dollars per month, while we who are in the fight sacrifice on an average of thirty-five ($35) dollars per month. I would to God that those men have their wages cut down one-half in the next twenty-four hours. In conclusion, I ask you your candid opinion in regard to the. boycott. Please let me hear from you at once. Sincere^ yours, Jno. E. Kline. } 122 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. Grand Lodge Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen, Terre Haute, Lnd., Dec. 14, 1888. Dear Sir and Brother : Your favor of December 6 came to hand during my absence from the city, which accounts for a delayed answer. I cannot give you any information of the action of the Committee appointed by the engineers in their Convention, other than what I received from Grand Chief Arthur and one member of the Committee. I have heard that it was the intention of the Committee to end the strike; but I can say to you honestly and candidly, that so far as a boycott is concerned it is simply nonsense to talk about it. Any sane man who will carefully consider the present situa- tion of the C , B. & Q., and the condition of our organization, would see the folly of our contemplating such a step. The day for boycott has long gone by; there was a time when it could have been put into effect, and something accomplished by it, had there been any disposition on the part of a large number of men to maintain it, but any man who was a witness of the situation at Chicago, during the time of the boycott, would see the folly of talking about one in this instance; and I must say to you very firmly and honestly, that the Brother- hood of Locomotive Firemen, as an organization, will have nothing whatever to do with a boycott, no matter what Mr. Cavener's statements may be. I am waiting for the report of this Committee which has been appointed by the engineers. "When their report comes in, if they have no way of ending the strike, I will find a way of getting the Brotherhood of Locomo- tive Firemen out of it, and I will go to work and endeavor to find employment for our members who are not able to find it themselves. It is a very good idea to go to work and preach federation and all these different doctrines, and then, when the time comes to act upon them, repudiate them. There is no man who appreciates the manly stand of the C, B. & Q. fire- men more than I, and there is no one in a better position to see the condition of the organization than I am. I am speaking for no effect other than to express my honest opinion. The time has come when this strike must end and the men must look for employment, and the quicker this is done the better it will be for all concerned. There are those in our Order who are not earning $40 per month and whose wages are far below the THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. 123 wages paid on the Western roads. These men have paid their last dollar and they are in want; their families must have clothes, they must have fuel to keep them warm; and I can tell you as a friend and brother that I do not propose to drive such men out of the organization after having done what they could to maintain the strike. As soon as the strike is off we will devote our time and attention to finding employment for such men as desire to make application to the Grand Officers. Let the consequences be what they will, we have decided upon the stand we shall take, and I shall take it as an official of the Order. The engineers in their Convention were in- formed of my opinion, as was Mr.Cavener, and it seems tome that when their Committee was appointed, it would have been nothing more than proper courtesy to have requested one of our members to act with them. This they did not do. They say it was an oversight, but it does not change my opinion as to their duty. I have learned through a member of the Com- mittee of what their action will be; and I desire to say to you as a brother, with the best feelings towards you and other members of your Lodge and all strikers, that the advice we gave you in our last communication was for yonr best interests as well as to the interests of every member in the country. The men who preach boycott had better be engaged in bring- ing about federation of the different organizations, so that they may act in harmony one with another. Better be men and acknowledge the strike lost, look for work and get them- selves in a position to fight again when we are called upon to do so. I trust you will receive this communication in the spirit in which it is written, as I desire to be honest with you and to give you what I believe the best advice that I possibly can, and, mark my words, the day will come when you will say that I was right. It may be when I am officially dead, but I know what the final result will be. I have the best of feeling for the engineers on the Burlington system, they have done their duty and done it manfully; and had they the support which they ought to have had, the result of the strike would have been very different. Trusting that the Brothers have decided to take the advice of one who is their friend, and if they desire assistance 124 THE GREAT STRIKE ON THE Q. in the way of positions and situations that they will apply for them, and wishing you all success, I remain, Yours fraternally, Frank P. Sargent, G. M. "The particular charge made was that Grand Master Sargent had advised firemen to take the places of engineers. And upon this gratuitous falsehood every conceivable charge has been rung. It will be observed that there is not so much as an intimation of such a thing, nor can any amount of torture of Grand Master Sargent's language make it convey such an idea."