^^Um Mt 'Cfm ■\T L I B RARY OF THL U N 1 VERSITY or ILLINOIS THE BISHOP OF LINCOLN ON THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND; PAST, PRESENT, and FOTUEE. A SERMON PREACHED BY THE LOED BISHOP OF LINCOLN BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, ON SUNDAY, 18th NOVEMBER, 1877. LONDON : JAMES PARKER AND CO., 377, STRAND. 1878. THE BISHOP OF LINCOLN ON "THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND;" PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE. And he said, Go thy way, Daniel; for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. Many shall be pnrified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand. — Daniel xii. 9, 10. It is the manner of. the Holy Spirit in sacred prophecy to pass rapidly from one future event to another foreshadowed by it, however far off that other event may be. Thus in Psalm Ixxii., after describing the peaceful monarchy of Solomon, He proceeds to foretell the glory of the Kingdom of Christ, the Divine Solo- mon, the Prince of Peace. So our Lord Himself, when sitting on the Mount of Olives, having pre-announeed the national judg- ment hanging over Jerusalem, goes on to predict His own second Advent and the universal judgment of the world. Simi- larly the prophet Daniel in the Scripture before us, having in the eleventh chapter revealed the sufferings which the Plebrew Church and nation would endure in the time of Antiochus Epi- phanes, King of Syria, passes on by a quick transition to unfold the trials which await the Christian Church in the latter days. Brethren, bear with me for saying that to one whose retro- spect in this place reaches back for fifty-seven years, it is a subject for serious inquiry whether in the history of the Church and the world during that time there has not been a gradual tendency towards a fulfilment of this prophecy of Daniel. Look- ing back on events which have occurred in the last half century, I would now propose, with God's help, to use them as an occa- sion for offering to you, my younger brethren, some suggestions as to your own duty consequent upon them. And first, in reviewing the past, we may recognise a remark- able change in popular opinion concerning the origin and claims of Authority, both civil and ecclesiastical. After the great con- flict at the close of tlie last century there still survived in the public mind some belief that Authority is derived from God, as St. Paul teaches in his thirteenth chapter to the Romans, and St. Pet'er in the second chapter of his first Epistle; and that obe- dience is due to lawful Authority in things not unlawful for the Lord's sake, and that resistance to Authority in such things is resistance to God himself. But this belief has now been greatly weakened, and Authority is commonly supposed to be derived from earth and not from heaven, and from man and not from God, and to have no other claim upon allegiance than that which depends on the voice of the People and not on the will of God. This change having taken place, it is not surprising that many ancient Dynasties on the continent of Europe should have been uprooted, and that there should be little prospect of permanence for those forms of Government which have succeeded them. In one great neighbouring Country there have been more than six- teen different forms of Government in rapid succession in the last eighty years. It would seem as if Daniel's prophecy (ii. 40-43) is now being fulfilled, that the Governments of the latter days which were to grow up after the dissolution of the fourth or Roman Empire would be like miry clay mingled with iron, but not cleaving to it. Is there not a marvellous accuracy in this prophetic description? Is it not true that some of these Govern- ments are like miry clay, being of the earth, earthy, and brittle as potsherds, by reason of their democratic element? And is it not also true that they are mingled luith iron, as deriving power not from moral, spiritual, and heavenly influences, but from the earthly mineral and rigid iron of physical coercion and military force? And is it not true also, that, like iron and clay, they have no principle of cohesion and co-operation? Together with this change in popular opinion as to the origin and claims of Authority, two other Powers have grown up, and have assumed fresh force in opposition to that authority. Men crave protection and admire strength. If they cannot find it in Monarchies, deriving their authority from God, they will , UIUC . \ / constitute supreme powers for themselves. Wherever tliey see Power endued with vigorous energy, combined with well com- pacted organisation, they gravitate towards it, especially if it acts with devotion and faith, and seems to rely on the support of what is unseen and eternal. On one side, therefore, in this nineteenth century, some have almost deified the Roman Papacy. They adore the Roman Pontiff as the Vicegerent of God, as wielding the power of the Most High, as disposing of the things of Time and Eternity, and as having dominion over the human reason, conscience, and will, and as the infallible Judge in matters both of faith and morals (as was declared in the Vatican Council of 1870), and as having supremacy over all Government, civil and ecclesiastical. On the other side, by an excess of reaction, some have been driven to defy all authority, whether temporal or spiritual, and to cast away all belief in a personal Ruler of the world, and in future rewards and punishments, and to place the People upon the Throne of God. Tliese two forces, being antagonistic, are now preparing for a violent conflict. They are hostile to one another ; but both are opposed to legitimate authority, and will do what they can to subvert it. Let us turn to our own Country. The condition of the Church of England, as a National Estab- lishment of religion, has been greatly modified by events in the last sixty years. The changes in our Constitution have affected the character of the Legislature. The admission into the Legislature of persons who do not accept the doctrine and discipline of the Church of England ; and the gravitation of the population to our great towns, where the Church is weak and where her work is opposed by a flood of cheap literature hostile to religion and society, have led to the enactment of laws altering the position of the Church. The union of Scotland, and more recently of L'eland, with England has naturally exercised a powerful influence on the Imperial Legislature. It may be almost said that the destinies of the Church of England, in her relations to the State, depend now not so much on England herself, as on the opinions and desires of Scottish Presbyie- 6 rianism, and Irish Ultramontanism, joined with sectarianism and scepticism, leagued against her. This has been exempHfied in a remarkable manner by recent debates and decisions in the Impe- rial Legislature concerning the Burial-grounds of the Church of England. The majority of 108 English votes in defence of our English churchyards was reduced to 33 by Irish, Scotch, and Welsh votes. But to return. The suppression of Ten Bishoprics . in Ireland, the alteration of the tithe system in that country, the disestablishment of the Irish Church in 1869, are some of the ecclesiastical events there. The ease also with which Church patronage has been recently abolished in Scotland (a.d. 1874) is significant of the popular feeling there ; and the breaking up of the kirk of Scotland into three separate forms of Presbyterianism seems to augur ill for the maintenance of any one religious estab- lishment in that country. In England the greater portion of the revenues of our Cathedral and Collegiate Churches has been alienated by recent legislative enactments, which did not provide for the efficient discharge of capitular duties. Church rates have ceased to be obligatory. The Marriage Law of the Church has been set aside by the Legislature, and great facilities have now been given to Divorce, and even to the marriage of the guilty parties. The Parochial Schools of the Church can claim no sub- sidy from the State, except by restricting the teaching of religion within narrow limits of time; and the Elementary schools of the State exclude all distinctive religious formularies from their system of instruction. The changes made by recent legislation in the reli<^ious character of our Colleges and Universities are too well known to you to need any notice from me. A vital question, to which I have already referred, and on which the maintenance of the Establishment hangs, is now pend- ing. A few years ago church rates were abolished, on the plea that our churches and churchyards do not belong to the Nation hut to the Church of England, and that it was unfair that persons dissenting from the Church should be taxed for their support. But now the argument is inverted ; and it is alleged by many that our churches and churchyards do not belong to the Church of England, but to the Nation, and that, since they are national property, persons of any religious persuasion, or of no religious persuasion at all, ought to be permitted freely to officiate at burials in our English churchyards. It is candidly avowed by many who use this language that the same principle ought to be applied to our English chuiches; and if this avowal is made by them noio what will be their language if their confidence is increased and their power aggrandized by surrender ? We know that in the troubles of the seventeenth century in England our churches were alienated, together with our churchyards. May we not say that the surrender of our sacred places, which have been solemnly dedicated to God, would be followed by calamities similar to those which befel the Hebrew Cliurch, when, according to Daniel's prophecy, her sanctuary was profaned, in the days of Antiochus Epiphanes, and when " the abomination and desolation " was set up in the Temple of God ? Brethren, these and other signs of the times are sufficient to show that the Churcli of England is now beleaguered by a formidable confederacy of powerful adversaries, who are resolved, if they are able, to reduce her to the same condition as that to which the Clmrch of Ireland has been lately reduced. And if it should please God, for our sins, to humble the Church of England in the dust, as she was humbled in the seventeenth century, it is probable that her downfall would be followed by the ruin of other national institutions (as it then was by the abolition of the legislative power of the Peerage, and the Monarchy), and by the spread of anarchy and confusion, of fanaticism and impiety; and that England might be reduced to the miserable condition of some other great nations of Europe. What, then, is our own duty under such circumstances as these? First, to endeavour to revive in the public mind a recognition of the divine origin of Authority, as declared in Holy Scripture. Is it not true that this feeling needs to be awakened in rulers as well as in subjects? If parents, masters, and employers of labour, and if governors,' civil and ecclesiastical, were resolved to act in the consciousness that the authority with which they are invested is received from God, and that He will call them to a strict account at the Great Day how they have used it, then they would reverence the authority they possess as a sacred trust from heaven, and would never abuse it to gratify their own selfish desires, or for any other purpose than the glory of God and the welfare of mankind. And if, on the other hand, children, servants, and subjects, and all who are under authority, temporal or spiritual, understood ichat authority is ; and whence it comes, they would not '• despise dominion and speak evil of dignities " (Jude 8), but would pray to God for them, and would cheerfully obey authority in all things not unlawful, as doing what they do, " not with eyeservice as menpleasers, but as to the Loird." If this spirit prevailed, the Church of England would not be weakened, as it is now, by intestine strifes, which are more dangerous to her welfare than her bitterest enemies. We should not see some persons, laying claims to superior sanctity, and yet violating the laws of Christian charity by wilfully giving offence to others, and breaking the bonds of Christian unity by preach- ing doctrines and introducing cere*nonies alien to the faith and worship of the Church, and driving others to the opposite ex- treme, and endeavouring to hurry her onward to disestablish- ment, as if it were a harbour of safety, and not rather a quicksand of shipwreck. Brethren, suffer me to say it, for the sake of our Country, of our Church, and of our God, let us not be impatient. It may be His will that disestablishment may come; but let us do nothing to hasten it. It may be, that the temporal authority may attempt to impose conditions upon the Church, which (if she is loyal to her Divine Lord) she cannot accept; and then her answer must be with the Apostles, " we ought to obey God rather than men." The three children at Babylon were loyal subjects, but they were content to be cast into the fiery furnace rather than commit idolatry at the king's command. Daniel was a loyal subject, but he would not obey the king's decree and omit even once his daily prayers. We must indeed submit to man for the sake of God, but we must not disobey God for the sake of man. We must endeavour to maintain the Establishment for the sake of the State, but we must never sacrifice the Church for the sake of the Establishment. But while we thus act let us not rush into temptation and lead others with us. The Established Church of England is one of our greatest national blessings. The Church of England, of all Churches in Christendom, is one of the best teachers of Loyalty, and one of the most faithful guardians of Order, Liberty, and Law. For evidence of this, examine her Liturgy, as compared with that of any other Church. Her rule of faith is the written Word of God, not warped by private opinions, but expounded and interpreted by the judg- ment and practice of the Ancient Church Universal. She holds the faith, neither more nor less, " once for all delivered to the Saints," and declared in the ancient Creeds of the Catholic Church ; she dispenses spiritual grace freely and fully in the holy Sacraments instituted by Christ, and she derives the commission of her Apostolic Ministry from the hands of her Divine Lord, enthroned in heaven, and communicating that grace by the unbroken chain of succession of that apostolic ministry for eighteen centuries. To disestablish such a Church as this, would be to inflict the heaviest blow that could fall on the English Nation. Bear with me for speaking feelingly on this subject. As having been en- trusted, most unworthily, with the oversight of a large diocese (indeed the largest) in England, mainly an agricultural one, I know what Disestablishment would be. Whatever its ultimate results might be (under the controlling and over-ruling providence of God) its proximate effect would be to pauperise the priest- hood, and to paganise the people. Methodism, the most respect- able and vigorous form of Dissent, has worked actively in that diocese, and is powerful in its toions, but it has no resident ministry in its rural districts, which would lapse into a miserable condition, socially, morally, and religiously, if they were deprived of the personal presence and salutary influence of the parochial clergy and of their families. It is probable that the battle of the English Constitution will have to be fought in agricultural dioceses, where the spirit of loyalty is still strong. // that spirit were weakened there (which it would be if the Church were disestablished and disendowed) then there is reason to fear that the Constitution would eventually be at the mercy of secularism, scepticism, sectarianism, republicanism, and Komanism, and that its days ere long would be numbered. Brethren, God only knows whether that time may come. Let us do what we can by His help to avert it. We need much prayer, courage, patience, and charity. Let us not close our 10 eyes to the dangers we are in. Let us not be like those prophets who daubed with untempeved mortar, and said, " Peace, peace, where there was no peace ;" but let us " speak the truth in love." In the days of the persecution of the Hebrew Church, as fore- told by Daniel, the enemy began his attack upon it hy flatter itig the priests, and by their means he invaded the sanctuary and destroyed it.. As I have already said, a similar attack is now beinof made against ourselves. Our adversaries are claiminor our churchyards and our churches as national property, and un- happily we are not united among ourselves in resisting the attack. Our present position is probably without a precedent in the history of the Church of England. The body is separated from its head. On one side nearly 14,000* of the clergy have now ioined too-ether in a manifesto aorainst the invasion of our churchyards, and in declaring that, while they respect the con- scientious scruples of others and are ready to co-operate in any reasonable measures for the removal of real grievances, tliey are of opinion that the compulsory introduction of other services than those of the Church of England into her burial-grounds would be an infringement of her rights, an encroachment on her pro- perty, an infliction of a grievance on the consciences of her ministers and members, and a precedent fraught with dangerous consequences to the Church and Nation, and a contravention of those religious purposes for which her churchyards have been set apart by a solemn act of Consecration. To this we may add that at the various Diocesan Conferences lately held, wherever this question has been discussed, these principles have been affirmed by the faithful Laity of the Church with no less energy than by the Clergy, and the opinion of the recent Church Congress at Croydon to the same effect could not be misunderstood. It was an axiom of the ancient Church, that nothing should be done by the Clergy and Laity without the Episcopate ; btxt it was also an axiom that nothing should be done by the Episcopate without the Clergy and faithful Laity of the Church, and still more that nothing should be done against them. May it not, therefore, be hoped that now, after these clear and * The number of signatures amounts now (Jan. 10, 1878) to li,561. 11 decisive utterances of the Clergy and Laity of the Church, the whole English Episcopate may henceforth be united with them in this great question ? This, indeed, would be an unspeakable blessing; then we might look forward to the future with hope; and then, whatever the secular power may think fit to do to the Church of England as an Establishment, she would be strong in the unity and mutual confidence of her members, and in the protection and blessing of her Divine Lord. But to take a wider view. Brethren, it is not improbable, that, in these latter days, to punish Nations for their sins, and to show the divine power of Christianity, Ahnighty God may be pleased to permit His Church to be left alone, not only indepen- dent of temporal powers but with the temporal powers arrayed against her ; and it is probable that the last age of the Church may be like the first age of the Church when she was openly assailed by the World. Certain it is, as Daniel has foretold, that in the latter days there will be " a time of trouble such as there never was since there was a nation," Certain it is, as St. John in the Apocalypse warns us, that Satan's wrath will be most fierce in proportion as his time is sliort, and as the day of his doom draws near, and that Anti-Christ will rage most fiercely on the eve of the coming of Christ. But even if this should be the case let us not be dismayed. When Laws and Institutions fail, then the courage of the faithful becomes more con- spicuous. The dissolutions of national establishments of re- ligion are great public calamities, but they are tests of per- sonal devotion, faith, and zeal, and are ministerial to the growth and exercise of personal holiness. The fall of Institutions is a signal for. the rising up of individuals. When the Church of Israel was disestablished, and false worship wa? set up in its place, then the greatest of the prophets, Elijah, came forth and stood upon Carmel, a witness for God against idolatrous prophets, priests, princes, and people. You remember the parable of the two baskets of figs, the one of bad and the other of good, in Jere- miah. The one, the bad, represented the members of the Church of Jerusalem who vainly gloried in themselves and said: " The Temple of the Lord, the Temple of the Lord are these." The other basket of good figs symbolised the Jewish exiles who had 12 been chastened and purified by their captivity at Babylon. Ezekiel, not at Jerusalem, but an exile on the banks of the river Chebar, saw the glory of the Lord. Daniel, not in the temple, but an exile in Chaldea, had a revelation of Christ. St. John, an exile in the Isle of Patmos, beheld the Apocalypse. If Antio- chus Epiphanes had not raged against the Hebrew Church, where would have been the glory of the faithful priests Eleazar and Mattathias, and of the mother and her seven martyred children, and of Judas Maccabeus and his brethren ? May we not say that we ourselves have already been awakened to a clearer sense of our own solemn responsibilities and spiritual privileges by the chastisements we have lately suffered ? At the beginning of this century, and for some years after it, many were slumbering quietly in a torpid, bedridden orthodoxy. The ser- vices of our Cathedrals were heartless, cold, and dreary. Canon- ries of cathedrals were regarded as sinecures. In the collegiate Church of Westminster, with which I was connected for twenty- five years, only one month's residence in the year had for more than a century been regarded as sufficient for the discharge of canonical duties. In the collegiate church of Southwell, in the diocese of Lincoln, only three months' residence in four years was all that was considered requisite for its canons. In the college chapels of our Universities daily attendance was required of our undergraduates, but many of the persons who derived their endowments from the bounty of the founders were rarely seen worshipping there. In our parishes we relied on the legal assessment of church rates, and not much was done for their sacred fabrics by voluntary efforts. But it has pleased God to arouse us by chastisements, and new life has shown itself in later years. Our "vales of Achor " have become to us *' doors of hope." The change for the better in our cathedrals is visible to all. With regard to religious life in our colleges you are better able to speak. This, however, my younger brethren, permit me to say, that in proportion as the rigour of academical laws has been relaxed, and your own private liberty has been enlarged with regard to public religious observ- ances, your own personal responsibilities in these respects have been greatly increased. In a spirit of generous confidence you are 13 thrown back on yourselves, and on your own consciences. Let me entreat you to be a law unto yourselves. Emulate the spirit of the golden age, as described by the Roman poet : — Satumi gentem, baud vinclo nee legibus jequam, Sponte sna veterisqne Dei se more tenentem. And here we may thank God for having raised up examples in our two ancient Universities of personal zeal and devotion, and moral and religious courage and self-sacrifice, and self-dedication to missionary work at home and abroad ; and we may tharrk God also that this spirit is now animating many of our daughters and sisters in Christ, who, in love of Him and the souls for which He shed His blood, are giving themselves up with holy self-con- secration to the work of educating the poor in schools, and to the nursing of the sick in infirmaries and hospitals, and to missionary labour at home and in foreign lands, especially in India and Africa. .And with regard to our parish churches, we have to record with thankfulness to God that about twenty-eight millions sterling have been expended in the last forty years in their restoration and enlargement, and in the building of new ones. In other respects, also, our trials have been over-ruled for good. The judicial decision of the Final Court of Appeal on the doctrine of Holy Baptism has led to a more careful exami- nation of the teaching of Holy Scripture, and of the Christian Fathers, and of our own English Reformers, and of our Prayer- book, and to a clearer enunciation of the truth concerning that Sacrament. The recent legislative action of Parliament on Ecclesiastical questions has led to a deeper consciousness of the need of a revival of the Diocesan and Provincial Synods of the Church; and if it should please God that the Church of England should cease to be a national institution, we may be thankful that our recent training in provincial Convocations and in diocesan Synods and Conferences has made us to be better pre- pared for such a catastrophe, than we should have been fifty years ago. Again, the quickening of parochial and diocesan life amongst us has produced a sense of the necessity of an increase of the Episcopate, which (let us say it with gratitude) Parliament itself has lately recognised, and will soon, we trust, more fully recog- u nise. A growing faith in the Divine constitution of the Christian Church, as it existed from the time of the Apostles for fifteen centuries, and in the blessings vouchsafed by AJraighty God to the faithful, by means of the Word and Sacraments, dispensed by the threefold ministry of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons, has led to the foundation of many new Episcopal Sees in our foreign dependencies. Our colonial and missionary Dioceses now amount to sixty-two, and to these we may add the fifty-seven sees of the United States of America, which are the offspring of the British Church; sio that we can now count one hundred and nineteen dioceses which have sprung into life since the year 1784. " This is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes." On the whole, then, brethren, while there is much to warn, there is also much to cheer us. It seems that each of the two antagonistic forces of good and evil is developing itself with greater energy; the good becoming better, and the bad becoming worse. The spirit of prophecy reveals clearly that the last days will be days of conflict between them. It seems to intimate that the Church of Christ will be deprived of temporal supports. The persecution under Antiochus Epiphanes will reproduce itself with greater intensity in Christendom. The book of Revelation prepares us for this trial. In the sixth chapter, at the eve of the end of the world, it speaks of a great earthquake. In the sixteenth chapter it describes that convulsion by a symbolical name, "Armageddon'^ (the mount of cutting to pieces) ; in the twentieth chapter it calls it by another symbolical name, derived from Ezekiel, the rising up of the vast and diverse forces of Gog and Magog against "the beloved City and Camp of the Saints." What- ever may be the precise meaning of these words, they certainly betoken struggles and confusions and assaults iipon the Church of God. Our Lord compares the latter days to those before the flood, and to those before the destruction of Sodom, and to those before the fall of Jerusalem. Such revelations as these may well excite our vigilance. They are words of warning to the Churcii and Realm of England. " He that hath ears to hear let him hear." My younger brethren, you will not suppose that by such words as these I am intending to disturb the peaceful tenor of your appointed studies in this place. No, on the contrary, let 15 me rather say th;Vt the diligent pursuit of those studies is your best preparation for the trials and troubles of public life. There can be no better preservative against " the oppositions of science, falsely so called," which are now leading many astray, than the habit of exact reasoning, which is generated by the discipline of Mathematical Science, especially when hallowed by that re- verential spirit of true Philosophy which animated the mind of a Bacon, a Newton, and a Barrow, and in our own days of a Whe- well, a Sedgwick, and a Herschel, whose names are household Avords in this University. And let me say of those Classical Studies which also claim your attention here, as among the best instruments of mental discipline; and in which the human intel- lect freely ranges over the wide domain of the history, philosophy, and poetry of the greatest nations of the ancient world, that you will find in your future career that the continued cultivation of Classical Literature (and I trust you will never cease to cultivate it) will elevate and enlarge your views, and raise your minds beyond the narrow limits and above the low level of ephemeral things; and will impart to them a sweet solace in the cares and sorrows of public and private life; and will soothe you with har- monious melodies, and enrich you with noble recollections, and adorn your minds with glorious imagery, and prepare you for the study of the highest and holiest of all sciences, that of Theology — " the Sabbath and haven of all human contemplations" (as Lord Bacon calls it), and for daily devout meditation on God's Holy Word, which will give you true wisdom, and without which the theories of politics are often but illusory dreams, and the history of nations a dark and unintelligible mystery. My younger brethren, the destinies of your own Church and Country depend mainly under God on the character and conduct of the rising generation of England. They are in your hands. The shadows of the latter days are falling upon us. You will endeavour to avert the calamities which seem to be hanging over us; but you will not be dismayed by them. You will regard them as calls from God to arouse you to nobler deeds and heroic sufferings for the truth. We have reason to hope and believe that bright examples of Christian valour, not inferior to those of primitive confessors and martyrs, and made more bright by 16 the darkness of the contrast, will shine gloriously in the gloom of the latter days. England may hope to see 'Christian Elijahs, Christian Jeremiahs, and Christian Ezekiels. TV'e do not expect new revelations. But is the Lord's arm shortened ? Why should not the Church of the latter days see even the apostolic courage, zeal, and calmness of a Paul, a Peter, and a John, of an Ignatius, a Polycarp, and a Cyprian? "Many," says Daniel, " shall be purified and made white and tried ; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand." " They that are wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament, and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever." Earthly dynasties will pass away ; but the dissolution of earthly things will wean your minds from this world, and make you look upward to heaven and onward to Eternity. Earthly dynasties will pass away, but the throne of Christ endureth for ever. His kingdom will never be destroyed. Empires may be disestablished, national churches maybe disestablished, but the Holy Scriptures, the Christian Sacraments, the Catholic Creeds, the threefold Ministry, tliese will never be disestablished. " The waves of the sea may riseVmightily, and rage horribly, but the Lord Who dwelleth on high is mightier. The Lord sitteth above the water flood, the Lord abideth a king for ever. Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, to-day, and for ever." He has promised to be with us always, even to the end of the world, and that the gates of hell shall never prevail against His Church, The Holy Ghost, once given at Pentecost, will abide for ever with the Church. " He that endureth to the end shall be saved." Therefore the word of our blessed Lord to each one of yourselves is this: " Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life." Westminater : Printed by J. B. Nichols and Suns, 35, Parliament Street. »sj^?^'t. :.'.';-:i'' ...'•• .fi-' -;"■-•',■,..■'• V -■ - - ^'.y^y. ,