bli\Cf{L'l(<^ inclusive, for the model at angles of attack of 0^ and IxP with various flap deflections. (Note compressions are white on fig. 52, black on figs. 55 to 57') These photograohs show that for angles of attack from O'^ to I|.° "the flow separates at approximately the 0.60-chord location for Mach numbers near the critical values, and with increasing Mach number the separation point laoves forward. The forward movement of the separation point is accompanied by a rearward movement of the shock along the separation boundary. A comparison of the schlieren photographs with the corresponding pressure-distribution diagrams shows that the existence of separated flow has a serious effect on the pressure distribution in the vicinity of compression shocks. (See, for exajiiple, figs. 9(d) and ^^(d).) It will be noted that for the condition of a well-defined shock and separated flow the pressure-distribution diagram indicates smooth compression. In addition, the location of the pressure corresponding to the critical pressure coefficient generally occurs from 5 to 10 percent of the chord downstream from the siiock location. This phenomenon is probably the result of the existence of large static pressure gradients in the separated-f low region between the boundary and the model surface where pressures were measured. The extent of the separated flow would be reduced for an airfoil having a smaller thickness-to- chord ratio . Critical Mach Number The variation of the critical Mach number of each surface v/i th flap deflection for constant angles of attack is presented in figure 56. The large decrease in critical Mach number that occurs at angles of attack between 6*^ CONFIDENTIAL NACA ACR No. L5a31a COITPIDBITTIAL 7 and 8° for the upper surface is a result of a rapid increase in the magnitude of the negative pressure coef- ficients near the leading edge. The difference hetween the critical Mach numbers for the upper and lower surfaces for corresponding conditions can be attributed to air- flow misalinenent . The highest critical Mach number for this airfoil is approximately O.65 j^nd is obtained for angular configurations corresponding to a normal force of approximately zero. ComDressibility Effects on Force and Moment Coefficients and integrations of The normal-force, moment, flap normal-force, hinge-moment coefficients obtained from integration.^ ^^ pressure-distribution diagrams are presented in figures 39 and 'I4.O . Each figure shows the variation in the coeffi- cient with Mach number at a constant angle of attack for each flap deflection. These figures are cross-plotted in figure kl to shov/ the variation in the coefficients at a constant Mach number. Normal-force coefficients . -Figure 59 shows that, with the flao at 0", the effect of compressibility on the normal-force coefficient at subcritical l.iach numbers is in accord with previous experimental and theoretical results. The variation for the other flap deflections at a fixed angle of attack, however, appears to follov\f, to some extent, both in direction and magnitude the variation for the condition of the flap at 0"-', as indicated by a lesser divergence of the curves than would have been expected from theoretical estimations. (See parts (c), (d), and (e), fig. 39-) A variation of this type shows dc^ tnat the effect of comoressibility on — — is small in dS the subcritical Mach number range. In the supercritical Mach number range above the value at which the peak normal-force coefficient occurs, the convergence of the curves for the various flap deflections at a given angle of attack indicates a rapidly dc>^ decreasing — ^ with increasing Mach number. The effect H ft of com-oressibility on — —, presented in figure 42, is d5 in accord with the variations indicated in figure 39' CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDEOTIAL NACA ACR IIo . L5G31a In the supercritical f'ach range for angles of attack not greater than 6'-' it can he seen in figure 59 that the peak normal-force coefficient for a given angular configu- ration occurred at a Mach nu^nber of approxiraately O.65, which indicates that this airfoil section should be restricted to designs v.herein the rr.aximum Mach number does not exceed O.65. A comparison of the various parts of figure kl in which is given the variation of the norr.al-f orce coeffi- cient with angle of attack shov/s that as the Ma.ch number dCv, Increases increases and reaches a majcimurri value at da a Mach number of O.65 as could have been expected from the preceding discussion. A further examination of figure kl shows that deflections of tlie flap produce a change in the angle of dCv, zero normal force, but have no appreciable effect on — ==• da for the more linear parts of the curves. The effect of dcp compressibility on — — for the more linear parts of da these curves is presented in figure J4.2. The flap effectiveness — , obtained from the ratio dc dc of — — to -k^ (fiG. H-2) and presented in figure L.5 , d 5 da decreased with increased Idach ni.u;iber and rapidly approached zero as the Mach number was increased above the critical value . Moment coefficients .- The variation of the moment coefficient with ?/:ach number in the subcritical range as shown in figure 39 i-3 small. In the supercriv^ical region the moment coefficients generally increase witl'i increasing Mach munber. This increase is followed by a rapid decrease, which occurs at a Mach number above the value at which the decrease in normal-force coefficient occurs. The pressure-distribution diagrams show that the decrease in noniial-f oi'ce results from a general decrease in the magnitude of the loading, and at higher Mach numbers the continued decrease in loading is accompanied by a change in distribution whJ.ch results in a decreased moment coef- ficient. COMFIDENTIAL NACA ACR No. L5G51a CONFIDENTIAL At the supercritical Mach numbers at which the normal forces lor the various flap deflections tend to he approxi- mately the same, the direction of the change in the moment coefficients is similar to the direction of the change in Cn- A variation of similar magnitude, however, could not be expected in these coefficients because of the large effect that a small change in load at the rear of the model has on the moment coefficient. A comparison of the effects of angle of attack and flap deflections on the variation in m.oment coefficient with normal-force coefficient can be seen in figure l+l. For constant flap deflection there is a small positive increase In moment coefficient v/ith an increase in normal- force coefficient. This slope remains approximately con- stant for Mach numbers to approximately 0.65. For Mach numbers above O.65, the variation depends on the flap deflection. At a constant angle of attack between -2° and 6°, large changes in moment coefficient occur in a negative direction with an increase in the nonnal-f orce coeffi- cient. These slopes, which are approximately constant to a Mach nuinber of 0.6, increase as the Mach number is further increased to O.7. Flap normal force .- The flap normal-force coeffi- cients are presented in fi^Tare I4.O . In the supercritical region, the variations in the coefficients are large and irregular, probably being influenced by the effect of flow separation. Hinge-moment coefficients .- The variation in the hinge-moment coefficients with I.'ach number, also shown in figure J4.O , are very similar to the variation in flap normal force. At Mach numbers from 0.01 to 0.02 below the maximum test value, a flap deflection range is indicated in which the flap tends to become or is overbalanced. At the same Mach number and for the same angular configuration, in figure 39 J ^o change occurs in the value of normal-force coefficient, and the control v/ould therefore be unresisting and ineffective. Although the Mach number is near the maximuim test value, for v/hich the data are of questionable value, the possibility of this condition of the control should not be overlooked. COWFIDSNTIAL 10 CONFIDENTIAL 2'TACA ACR No. L5G31a The hinge-moment coefficients are presented in figure iil in the sane manner as the moment coefficients. It can he seen that for a constant flap deflection the magnitude and direction of change of hinge-raoment coeffi- cient with increase in nori.-ial-f orce coefficient depends on the absolute value of the flap deflection. The slope for a given flap deflection increases positively v.-ith increases in Kach number to 0.675 5 further increases in y.ach number are accompanied by increases in the slope in the negative direction. At a "ach number of 0.1x0 the changes in hinge moment with flap deflection at a constant angle of attack are generally uniform over the flap deflection range. At a ?.!ach number of 0.60 and above in the negative normal- force-coefficient range the changes in hinge-moment coef- ficient for flap deflections between 0'^ and -UP is very small compared v/ith the changes at larger deflections. This effect is possibly a result of the reversals in the load over ■che flap produced by the very thick boundary layer or separated flow. (See pressure-distribution diagrams and schlieren photographs.) Balance- chamber pressure-coefficient differential ( Pj^ - Pp ) . - The difference oetween the pressure coeffi- cients for the lower-surface and the upper-surface balance chambers is presented in figure i^4. This figure shows the effect of Kach number, flap deflection, and angle of attack on the pressure-coefficient differential. The effect of compressibility on the pressure- coefficient differential is generally small at Mach numbers below O.65. Tliis small effect could be expected when the magxiitudes of the individual pressure coeffi- cients are sm.all and are measured at a station in rear of the position of the maximum negative pressu-.-e coefficient. The decrease in the magnitude of the pressure coefficient at the high Mach numbers is primarily a result of the effects of flow separation. The balanced hinge-moment coefficient for this model can be obtained by adding the hinge -moment coefficient of figure li.0 to the product of the balance- chamber prcssure- coufficient differential ( Pl - ^) ^""^ ^ constant, the constant depending on the length of the balance tab. A brief comparison of figures 1^.0 and kh indicates that at COHFIDEIITIAL NACA ACR No. L5G51a CONFIDENTIAL 11 dcv, low speeds the effect of the balance would be to reduce — — d5 as compared with the unbalanced condition. With increasing Mach number the effect of the balance decreases for the lower angle-of -attack range. CONCLUDING R 3,1 ARE The results of the investigation on the modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil having a 0,20-chord flap indicate that the effectiveness of a traillng-edge control surface of small chord rapidly decreases and approaches zero as the Mach number increases above the critical value. Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory National Advisory Co:rmiittee for Aeronautics Langley Field, Va. REFERENCES Stack, John, Lindsay, W. P,, and Littell, Robert E.: The Compressibility Burble and the Effect of Com- pressibility on pressures and Forces Acting on an Airfoil. NACA Rep. No. 61^.6, I938 . Byrne, Robert W.: Experimental Constriction Effects in High-Speed V.'ind-Tunnels . NACA ACR No. LiiLOya, NACA ACR No. L5G51a CONPIDEITTIAL 12 TABLE I.- BASIC SECTION ORDINATES FOR MODIFIED HACA 65,5-019 AIRFOIL SECTION j Stations and ordlnates are in percent chord J Station — — — - — — — 1 Ordinate Upper Lower 1 surface surface ! .5 1.108 -1.108 1 1.921 -1.921 2 2.59S -2.598 ^ ^.620 H.I)-37 -^.620 -4.457 8 5.127 -5.127 10 5.725 -5-725 ^ 6.715 -6.715 18 7.525 -7.525 22 6. 192 -8 . 192 26 8.721 -8.721 50 9.115 -9.115 1 9.371 9.II90 -9.371 -9.490 ¥ 9.500 9.471 -9.500 -9.471 k6 9.515 9.02/1. -9.315 -9.024 50 5^ 8.597 -8.597 5^ 8.059 -8.059 62 7.570 -7.570 66 6.612 -6.612 70 5.791 4.922 -5.791 -4-922 ^^ 78 ii..029 -ii.o029 82 8.128 -8 . 128 86 2.2II7 -2-247 90 9k l.Zllo .683 -1.I116 -.688 98 .158 -.158 100 ° L.E. radius: 2.159 CONFIDENTIAL NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 1 O to > »- a. => O 2 55 o > « I' < "^ Z UJ O Vj < z UJ O U (U o o 0) u bo X Fig. 2a-f NACA ACR No. L5G31a CONFIDENTIAL X Upper surface O Lower surface (a) /V= 0.434. (ti M= O. 6/8. % o i: o \ vA -^. / '^^^^^-^^'^ft^, (c) M-O.t t7S. (dJ M=0.70J. (e) M^0.7£7. 20 40 60 60 ^. A r^' -^cr r /oo (f) M= 0.745. ao 40 60 60 /OO Perccnf chord CONFIDENTIAL NATIONAL AOVISOQV COMMITTU m UKMUUTICS Figure 2.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap. a - -2°; S = 0°. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 3a-f CONFIDENTIAL X Upper surface O Lower surface (a) M ^0.4 J 4. r,^ ^,-0-0' ^x- — — ^rr ( ■^ N ^-^ f {b) M^O.6/4- I / \ ^. '-"^ "~^ f \ (a) /•^-O.^J^Z. (b) /^=0.6/J. Ss. (C) M-0.6 7/. icf) n-o.70/. (e) M-O. 73^, (t) n-O. 74-5. ZO ^O 60 GO lOO O ZO 40 60 QO lOO Percent chord NATIONAL AOVISbQV COMNITTti rn AlKMAUTKi CONnoCNTIAL Figure 4.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap. a = -2°; h - -8°. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 5a-f CONFIDENTIAL X Upper sur/ace O Lower surface (a) n^0.4J6. r^ \ --P.r ^ - K r ^ li lb) /7--a 6/0. o 0; •n Ic) M^ 0.674. id) n^o.yoo. r^. ^ ■"-o-o-^j r^jy N -J r leTn^aTJ/. * (f) n^o.7^5. £0 40 60 80 /OO 20 40 60 SO '^r /oo Percent chotd CONFIDENTIAL NATIONAL ADVrSORY COMMITTEE FOB AERONAUTICS. Figure 5.- Pressure distribution fur a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap, a = -2°; S = -12°. Fig. 6a-f NACA ACR No. L5G31a CONFIOENTJAL X Upper surface O Loiver surface (a) n=0.442. (D) n -0.646. .~^ v r^ '\ ^ - ^r ^ ^ — ^ i (c) n=o.t "JZ. u^ ^^ ,/ K \ ^ - ^r r ^ id] n-0.706. -2 (e) n =0.716. (f) M -0.143. O 20 40 60 80 /GO 20 40 60 60 /OO fierce nf chord CONFIDENTIAL Figure 6.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap. a = 0°; 5 = 0°. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 7a-f CONFIDENTIAL X Upper surface G Lower surface (a) A7= 0.455. it) M -0.650. a .0) O Q) (C) /^= 0.677. / y % s N -f^cr f \ 1 id) /V- 0.709. -I o ^r (Q) /^= 0.753. £0 40 60 60 /GO O if) n^O.746. ZO 40 60 SO /-^Qrc enf cAorc/ CONFIDENTIAL NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FM AERONAUTICS /OO Figure 7.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with .20-chord flap. a = 0°; 8 = -4°. Fig. 8a-f NACA ACR No. L5G31a CONFIDENTIAL X Upper surface O Lower surface I ^ I (QJ M^0.4D7. i£>J M-0.6^Z. (W f7=0.708. -/ O / ^4P (9) M =0.7 J 6. O 20 40 60 SO /OO O'J M -0.744. ZO 40 60 do /OO Perc enf ch or d NATIONAL A0VI5ORV COMMITTU rot AiKMAUTKS CONFIDENTIAL Figure 8.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap, a - 0°; S - -8°. NACA ACR No. L5G3la Fig. 9a-f CONFIDENTIAL X Upper surface Q Loi\'er surface (a) M-0.43 /. y^ \ ' — 1 o 'ij cr ( \ 4 (i^\ /^ - rs t ^^ Q a s -I (c; fi^o.c76 (Of J fl^O.lOJ. -i o- ^ Y -^, A y s ^-^ H ^ \, (e) M -O. 734. (f) n^O.743. f?r ^o 40 e>o 60 /oo o zo Perc ent chores CONFIDENTIAL 40 to 80 NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOB AERONAUTICS. /OO Figure 9,- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap . a = 0°; S = -12°. Fig. lOa-f NACA ACR No. L5G31a CONFIDENTIAL X Upper surface O Loivpr surface (a) M^ 0.^-56. (t) M=0 643. c O ^ o "-0 ^ ^ ^ \ f? ^ -^r i ^^"^^ (C) n^ac 5/(5. y^ --^ ^ -y 1 k -^cr r /_/! pC>-«fc=^ /■r surface (a) /^ =0.433. ^ ^^^^N ^ N .^ M n=0.64.8. (1) Q o (c) >i^0.677. Id) fi=0.707. -2 O 10 do 60 eo /oo (f) M =0.74 2.. 10 40 60 aO 100 Fierce n^ chord i«»noN*L *ovrsoRY COMMITTEE FW *£IK)»I4UTICS CONFIDENTIAL Figure 13.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap. a = 2°; S = -12°. Fig. 14a-f NACA ACR No. L5G31a CONFIDENTIAL X Upper surface O Low£>r surface (a) M = 0.^33. ^,_^ "^<"~^. (? X \ H f {d] n^O.706. (e) n-0 75S. '^ W) TT^074r. O ^0 40 60 so too ZO 40 60 80 100 Perce nf chord nation»i «Dvi$oiiy COMNITIU rot UIONMJTKS CONFIDENTIAL Figure 16. - Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-01! airfoil with C.20-chord flap. a = 4° ; S « -8°. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 17a-f CONFIDENTIAL -/ X Upper surface O Lower surface {a) f7^ 0.455. (b) n^0650 (A y \ \ f N id) n=o.7 06. (e) M^0.7J5. 10 40 60 dD -^ -^ (A \ f 100 if) M=0.740. dO 40 60 SO P'ercenf chord CONFIDENTIAL NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FM AERONAUTICS ^cr 100 Figure 17. - Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap. a = 4°; S = -12°. Fig. 18a-f NACA ACR No. L5G51a K^ n CONFIDENTIAL X Upper surface O Lower surface (a) A7= 0.^55. *i?«>^-=*q (b) ri^ 0.566 Q> O O -I y ^ 1 — ^"^ — 1 h^ ^r / (0 n^ot 57^. id) n= 703. (n>i= 0.73a. (e) r/= 0.724. CONFIDENTIAL O 20 40 60 80 KX) O £0 40 60 80 100 Percent chord Figure 18.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with O.PO-chord flap. a = 6°; 3 = 0°. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 19a-f CONFIDENTIAL X Upper surface O Loi^er surface (O) M^O.44/. ib) f1=Q6/S>. a o u -/ I (c) M =0.6 16. (d) M =0.703 O IdFhOJJI. 20 40 60 60 /OO If J M = 0.736. 20 40 60 80 /OO f^&rc£-n^ chord CONFIDENTIAL NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOfl AERONiUTICS Figure 19.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap. a = 6°; 8 = -4°. Fig. 20a-f NACA ACR No. L5G31a CONFIDENTIAL X Upper surface O Lower surface v_^ j^ — '■ ■ \ -^r ^^ ^ M ^ ^:^^>^ i y ^ ^ M ^^:^ { — ^ r s ^-^^ (a) M=0.440. (b) M=0.625. 8 ^ 0) V\ ^ y ( (C) A;- H /-- \^ V \ p reJ M=0.? '05. ■Per (f) /^=0720. ^ 40 60 60 /OO 20 40 GO 80 /OO fierce nf chord CONFIDENTIAL NATIONAL AOVISOQV CONH'TTfl rO* A|>0N4(;TKS Figure 22.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap. a = 10°; S = 0°. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 23a-f Upper surface Lower surface CONFIDENT (a) M = 434. (b) AI=0.J66. \ s._^ ^ \ \ \ ^r ^ >- '^^^ -^-*=^ A V (c) A7 = 0. 6/5. p- — -- X I H :>^tzz 1 / c (d) Ai=a< J6/. (e) M = C.701. O ZO 40 60 60 /GO 20 Perceni chore/ CONFIDENTIAL r^ P--i3^ \-^^^ ■*^ ^ / y Y ^cr f p (f) fA^ 0. 7/9. 40 60 60 /GO NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEt FOB AEftONiUTrCS Figure 23.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0. 20-chord flap, a = 10^; S = -4°. Fig. 24a-f NACA ACR No. L5G31a CONFIDENTIAL X Upper surface O LoiA/er surface' (a) n-O.453. \ \ p V ^ X- y^ ^^^*"=Si^ / r- X \ j\ H f^ -\ ^ H y ^r / ^/; Ai~0. 7ZO. (eJ >/-0.7/Z. ZO 4^ 60 eo lOO O ZO 40 GO SO lOO Percenf chord NATIONAL AOVISOQV COMNITIK F(M AfKMlUTtCS CONFIDENTIAL Figure ?4. - Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap. a » 10°; S = -8°. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 25a-f CONFIDENTIAL X Upper surface O Lower surface (a) M =0.459. (b) /^= 0.55 7. (d) /^= 0.696 (e) r/=0.7JS. (f) n=0.72/ ^ -^ — Z:z^ A y V -e^ O ZO 40 60 60 /OO O ZO 40 60 SO /OO Percent cf>ord CONFIDENTIAL NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FM AERONAUTICS Figure 25. - Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap. o = 10°; S = -12°. Fig. 26a-f NACA ACR No. L5G31a CONFIDENTIAL o X Upper surface O Lower surface r (aJ n^O.43/. ^^ — ^■v — — cr ( .^ ^xr-o-^ ^ f^ ( -\ p>^ n^o.eao. M=o.lO^. o le) M -0.13 5. ao 40 60 60 /OO (f) M-O. 145. ^0 40 60 60 100 Percent cford NATIONAL ADViSOav COMMlTTtt FM AltOHAUllCS CONFIDENTIAL Figure 26.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap. a = 2°; S • 4°. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 27a-f CONFIDENTIAL X Upper surface^ O Lower surface (a) n =0.434. ^ .^^^ V -^r ^ \ ^ ( 1 ^-^ (b) n =0.6/8. \ a !1J I. / /^' .-.r^ — ^. L>^ N: ^^-^ / 'N l^^-^r^ 1 • I — T" — /?: i::iQ, {C/J M= 0.703. O (e) M =0.7 32. iO 40 60 80 ZOO (f) M =0.744. 20 40 60 80 Percent chord CONFIDENTIAL NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOB AERONAUTICS 100 Figure 27.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap. a = 2° ; 8 = 8". Fig. 28a-f NACA ACR No. L5G31a CONFIDENTIAL X Upper 5urfac£> O Loiver surface- (o) /^-0.-f-3/. (t>) M-O.6/5. .C5 -/ o \ y ^ ^ ^. / ^ '"''o ■ % (c) M=0.<. ^^73. (cf) M-0.70Z. (e) M-0.13/. * (t) M-07^5. zo 4-0 60 eo /oo o 20 40 60 ao /OO Percerit chord N&TION&l ADVISOBV oxmrTTii rn tuoaiuiKS CONFIDENTIAL Figure 28.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap. a - 2°; S - 12°. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 29a-f CONFIDENTIAL X Up/XT surfacp O Lower surface (a) /^=0.430. JV— --- — ■ -\ — ^r J/- \ ' ° — J r a -2 ^ I /^ -^ \ \ ^ r ^ \ r 1 >-Cv_C?»~' \ (c) /^= Ot ^47. (d) M-a 104. (e) n- 0.1 3 3 £0 40 60 QO /CO (f) M = 0.74/. 20 4i> 60 80 /OO Perce/?/ c/)orc/ CONFIDENTIAL NATIONAL AOVISOQV COMMITTEE rot AERONAUTICS Figure 29.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap. a = 4°; S = 4°. Fig. 30a-f NACA ACR No. L5G31a- CONFIDFNTIAL X Upper surface O Lower surface (a) M- 0.434. ft) Af- OSS) a. fcf) >f=0.705. -/ — 1 a fy r . \ 1 L? r ii fA M- n 7 ^5f o 30 -^r /oo o (f) M =0.742. 20 40 60 60 f^erce.nt chore/ NATIONAL AOVlSOnv COMHITTEl rOI AIMWAUTlCS /GO CONFIDENTIAL Figure 30.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with .20-chord flap. a = 4°; S - 8°. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 31a-f CONFIDENTIAL X Upper surface O Lower surface- ta) fi-O.^bi. (b) Af-0.je4. (d) n-O. 70/ . ■Per ie) A7-0. 127. 20 40 60 60 if) MzO. 14/. /OO 20 40 60 60 /OO /^ercent c/iorc^ CONFIDENTIAL Figure 31.- Pressure distribution for a modified NACA 65,3-019 airfoil with 0.20-chord flap. a = 4°; S = 12°. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 32 a-e < Q I — I z o o o • o I ,J^ . O ^ <« - >— 1 U > ■sT •H o CN nj rs • o 05 .—1 u o S to O a: 1 Be) . — tn (U <£) a: o O H *"* < M O M a E3 u «n •^ J T3 O ■J •< O O o o E II '4 a td d s o L, O ij t« CL S tti J o .— 1 < 1— 1 (.H I — 1 «M X) 2 0) t4 Cd £ O Q tJ 1 — 1 [X. Li CO (D IN •M (M -— 1 t- O en T3 1 to (U 1-1 3 bo I NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 33 a-e xa O (►-1 ^ Li > •H a ■^ n3 >* b. JS C7^ CO H i—i U H O II o 1 4 M to O s •* <« 1 H lO QJ to £3 < , u H 03 uo H 4 H .J <: ^ a *j 2 1 a -4 u U i-t T3 u o; a « "H £/0 > M j < CO 31 -4 o u -TD II • ^ CO <4-J < H Z Ixl Q I— ( Ce. Z o •T30 O O d II CO in d II i^ a o . <.-4 , lO a. to s nJ J o rH < d ^ t^-l t-H <^-i E-1 II x) 2 s CD tj Cd x: o a . — . ♦J X K- < QJ o Cr. ■ ■ tM 1 2; o o o CO u to . x; o CL 03 x; t-i o II - CJ> m »-> W M O .—1 O 4 4 II 1 K *J to 06 1 2. .v in oe o uZ ^£> •■a — . , M O -i • a. < in S 03 t— 1 to O rH E-" !>- .-H V< Z o <^ td X! Q II (V U 1 — 1 s; x; o (x. ■^ x: 2; , . o o 0) (.-( 1 o eren photographs o section with 0. 20 . ■rH u: .-H o -C D- o d CO II 1 s UD t . — . to X3 bo NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 36a-e to O II 00 to d II o <.-J r— I o I CO ID < • < 'J 2 I t3 h dJ U M •-• .J t" O oe o o ** M O O U < I— t E-i Z td Q O O O ^- d II o IN IS o 0) ♦J O T30 O "Jj* E H d o <-i . Q. S cd O r-H T3 Ui O o I o ta • j:: O (d x: U *3 bo -H O S +^ O C x: o c o 0) OJ U CO 0) en to 0) L, 3 bo < Cd Q fe. O O NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 37a-f CD d II o II o •H r— I O CO < o a) cd t-i o 3 [0 (u Q o -f: cd Vj 0) o\/[/ /£?j?///v;? Fig. .39a NACA ACR No. L5G31a NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTCE FOB AEDONtUTICS J .^ ^ .6 Mach number, M (a: ■2°. Figure 39.- Effect of compressibility on section normal -fo rce and moment coefficients. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 39b .2 .3 A .S .6 Mach number , M .7 (b) a = 0°. Figure 39.- Continued. Fig. 39c NACA ACR No. L5G31a ^n ./ .3 .4 .3 .6 /V\ach number, /V1 7 .6 (c) a = 2°. Figure 39. - Continued. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 39d ./ -J .4 .S .6 AAach numijer, M (d) a = 4°. Figure 39.- Continued. Fig. 39e NACA ACR No. L5G31a ^ — I 1 NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FM AEBOHAUTICS .J A .5 .a Mach number , M a (e) a = 6°. Figure 39.- Continued. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 39f ^n .3 .4 .S .6 Mac/7 number, M ( f ) a = 8°. Figure 39.- Continued. .7 .& Fig. 39g NACA ACR No. L5G31a .S .6 Mach number, M 7 .3 ( g) a = 10°. Figure 39.- Continued. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 39h -n C„ NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOB AERONtUTICS O ./ .2 .3 .4 S 6 Mach number ,M (h) a = 12°. Figure 39.- Continued. .& Fig. 39i ■ NACA ACR No. L5G31a ^n mc/^ .J .4 .5 .6 Mach number, M .7 .3 (i) a = 2°; positive flap deflections. Figure 39.- Continued. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 39j o ./? .3 .4 .S .6 AAach number ,AA (j) a = 4°; positive flap deflections Figure 39.- Concluded. NACA ACR No. L5G31a .3 4 .S .6 hach number^ M (a) a -2< Figure 40.- Effect of compressibility on section hinge-moment and flap normal-force coefficients. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 40b CONFIDENTIAL I I .4 .s Moch /lumber, AA (b) a = 0°. Figure 40.- Continued. Fig. 40c NACA ACR No. L5G31a ^/, .3 .^ .S .6 .7 Mach number, /\A ( c) a = 2°. Figure 40.- Continued. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 40d ^/7. -^ .J .4 .5 .6 AAach number , M e ( d) a = 4°. Figure 40.- Continued Fig. 40e NACA ACR No. L5G31a CONFIDENTIAL ^ O J .J .4 .S .6 .7 Mach /?amher, AA (e) a = 6°. Figure 40.- Continued. NACA ACR No. L5G31a 4 Fig. 40f "/I f -J -.2 9, o ./ NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOt AERONAUTICS CONFIDENTIAL .3 .4- .S jS Mach number, M .7 .& ( f ) a = 8". Figure 40.- Continued. I Fig. 40g NACA ACR No. L5G31a -3 NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FM AERONAUTICS ^A O (g) a = 10°. Figure 40.- Continued. NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 40h ^h O .S .4 .5 .6 Mach number, M NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE -FM AERONAUTICS .7 .G (h) a = 12°. Figure 40.- Continued. Fig. 40i NACA ACR No. L5G31a ^. 9, ./ .3 .4 .5 .G (i) a = 2°; positive flap deflections. Figure 40.- Continued. i NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 40j ^ o 4 G r2_ r r7 V ^ ^i\ ^U— _ ^ ^ ^<;^ ./ I 1 "^ IE /\. . o~~- ^1 L ~o — ^ :& ^ Zii NA COMM TIONAL ADVIS TTEE rO« AE«0 OBY < NtUTICS k -3 /^ CONFIDE :ntial .3 A .S .ff Mach number, AA .7 .& (j) a = 4°; positive flap deflections. Figure 40.- Concluded. Fig. 41a NACA ACR No. L5G31a ^^ •H o u Ci 1 u ro 0) ~XI ID E <£> 3 C < O jC < O z (d 2 T3 (U -fJ •H C • tw nj o — 1 tJ •^ T3 M • o c o E o o 1) o M JG •H CJ Lj I (U o ■.-> CJ CJ . (d o u, nJ x: o c o ■w ♦» CJ o" r <0 I ■ ^ a; u 3 NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 41b ( /' \ X \ \ 1. \ V ^- -^: -^ ^-^ ^^ ^^ ^--^ ^ .n^ o "^ '^. <\l <:i ^. ^ Ki 00 ^ ^^ Fig. 41c NACA ACR No. L5G31a z o u Z o o ^*^^^ — " ' \ ■\ ., u :-^.-_ — ~^^-^ :^ - ^""^-T" --^.^ :.l \ * ^ D O ^ f\i ^ 1 ^ ^ vN to •a 0) C c o U 3 bo 00 •O ^M I' V.*^ ^ 00 1 NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 41d id c ■H c o bo <:i ^ 00 <) ^i ^ 1 <5 I °0 I r Fig. 41e NACA ACR No. L5G31a _i < z o z o u ■^ln?;-5* X)- * VV\'\ fM- 1^ \ S- <^ Z w 9 r I "^z -^^ _L-Jj 1 ^ vo^ ^^ ^ "-..^ \ fw S:^ 'N I- z o u 1- V3: ■<:; ^ •n ^ 'J W o .5 - c o u 3 bo \ \ ,^^ '-^ ^i. \ \ \ \ \ ~ ^ \ ^l'^ ^ 1 1 1 <<3 VO 'V I ■ I ■ I 03 NACA ACR No. L5G31a Fig. 41f z o o z o u > ^^ sf \^ "\l o CO ■-* CO -.J a> CI Li (D CL V-l e <-■ O) 1 1- ■-I CO S; — I 0) >^ 43 > <: ■->. u -■ 5 CO 3 z .^ CO o 9!i 0) 5? Ui 5) c 0) u C .&x 4- O- -4- 0_ ii) oc^a' NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEt FM *f«ON«UTICS .a. CONFIDENTIAL (jJ 0:^4". .4 5_ XI ..3_ Mach number, M .6. .7_ .Q Figure 44.- Concluded. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 262 08 05 004 8 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA DOCUMENTS DEPARTMENT 120 MARSTON SCIENCE UBRARY RO. BOX II 7011 GAINESVILLE, FL 32611-7011 USA