£x Libris K. OCDEN THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES ^ \ N \^4. NAPIER oS MEIVCMIti TOJ« r^t^'f- ff/ /^*^ ^^>^t^>'f/A r»i^, ^i.f_ iTrAi A- ^tt^A^^pt.-- >^Cf Afi^ e^ fiu*. Great. Man e,> j>A**>Air /^■*-^/'^/'< VIf-4*»rM«i^gft .:: Hume's fiflt. Vi.l.vn, j>. as. .♦ r pdit.i-jiA. A N ACCOUNT OF THE LIFE, JFRITINGS, and INVENTIONS O F JOHN NAPIEK, O F ME R C II IS TON; BY DAVID STEWART, EARL of BUCHAN, AND WALTER MINTO, L. L. D. ILLUSTRATED iriTH C O P P E R P L yl T E S. QUAMDO VI.LUM INVSNIEJ PARFM? P E Jl T IT: PRIXTED Br R. MORISOX, yUXR. FOR R. MORISON AND SON, nOOKSEI.I.ERS ; AND SOI.n BY G. (J. .1. AND J. ROBINSON, PATER-NOSTE R- ROW, LONDON; AND W. CREECH, EDINBURGH. M,DCC,LXXXVII. T O T 11 £ KING. SI R, As the writings of Archimedes were addrened to the King- of Sicily, who had perufed and rehllied them, fo I do myfelf the honour, to ad- drcfs to Your Majefty, the following account of the Life, Writings, and Inventions of bur Britilh Archimedes, in which, I can claim no other merit, than having endeavoured to call forth and illuftrate tlic abilities of others. I feel great plcafurc, in dedicating this TraCi to Your Majefty, after the chafte and dignified model of Antiquity, be- ftowing on the King, the merited encomium, of having promoted the Sciences and Arts, with which it is connccled ; and in alTuring Your Majefty, that I am, with the greatcft refpcct, Your Majesty's Moll dutiful Subjed, and Obedient humble Servant, li U C H A N. lorBO^*^ ''iitif==s=r=>s£^iX7i ^'^'^ 32> (. ^^^ obferving that the produtfl or quotient of any two terms of the former correi^ poiadcd to the fum, or difference, of the cquidiftant terms of the latter. N Whether ^iees, and the method of Logarithms, is wider than it may at firil feem. Any Number, not itfclf arifing from a root, is the root of a difilnit progrcCion of Powers. Ilencc tlicre are as many diflindl progrefTions as there are numbers not aftually powers : And in all thefe progreflions tie homologou* powers have the fame exponents or indices. Thus 3 is the exponent of the number 8 in tl-.e ferie* of the powers of 2. But 3 is equally the exponent of 27 in the feries of the powers of 3 ; of 125 in the feries of the powers of 5 ; of 343 in the feries of the powers of 7 : and univcrfaUy of all cubic nuinf bers ; fo 4 is the exponent of all biquadratic numbers ; 5 of all quadrato-cubic ; and fo on. A num- ler therefore is not fufficiently charafterifed by its exponent unkfs it be known to what feries of pow» ers it belongs, that is from what root it arifes. Add to this that many numbci-s fall into no natural feries of powers. Thk method therefore of computing by the natural indices of powers arifing from the natural numbers as roots, will only ferve the purpofe of rude calculations leading to fome very ge- neral conclufions, and mull fail in all inflances in which accuracy is required. Archimedes never thought of confidering all numbers as exprefllons of proportions, capable of being univL-i fally included in one general feries of ratios, which notion is the true bafis of Napier's great invention, as will be more f.il- ly explained hereafter. For the invention in cfTcft was this ; that he found a method to raife a feries of proportionals, in which all numbers fhoiild be comprifed, in which every number of confcqucncc had its own particular exponent, and to find the ^ponent of any given number, or tlie number of any given exponent in that univerfal feries." In the courfc cf this work, it will be fulHcienly proved, tliat Napier was as much the firfl to con- ceive ns to execute this wondcrfiJ projeft. • Thofc who wi(h to rccolleft how much we are indebted to the ancients, in tliis as well as in many ether departments of fcicnce?, will read with plcafurc Mr Dutcn's Inquiry into the origin of the ^'f- itovcriiJ altvllattd to the Tiwtknis. 50 L I F E, W R I T I N G S, AND Whether Napier ever faw or heard of this remark of Stlfeilitis it not known, nor indeed is it of any confcqiience ; for it cannot fail o£ prefenting itfelf to any perfon of moderate acutenefs who happens to be engaged in arithmetical queftions of this nature where the powers of numbers are concerned. It is not therefore this barren though funda<- mental remark that can entitle him who firfl mentioned it to the name of the inventor of the logarithms. The fupcrior merit of Napier con- fifls in having imagined and afligned a logaritiim to any number what- ever, by fuppofing diat logarithm to be one of the terms of an infinite arithmetical progrcflion, and that number one of the terms of an infi- nite geometrical progreihon whofe confecutive terms differ infinitely little from each other. The invention of the logarithms has been attributed to Chriftianua Longomontanus, one of Tycho Brahe's difciples, and an eminent aflro- noraer and mathematician in Denmark. The hackneyed flory which gave rife to this, is told by Anthony Wood in his Athence Oxon'tenfes *, and is as follows ; " Gne Dodlbr Craig, a Scotchman, coming out of ** Denmark into his own country, ca led upon John Neper baron of Mer- " chifton near Edinburgh, and told him among other things of a nev^ " invention in Denmark (by Longomontanus as 'ti>s faid) to fave the ** tedious multiplication and divifion in allronomical calculations. Ne- ** per being follicitous to know farther of liim concerning this matter, *' he could give no other account of it than that it was by proportional " numbers. Which hint Neper taking, he defired him at his return to • call again upon him, Craig alter fome weeks had palTed did fo, and " Neper • VoL I. p. 469. INVENTIONS OF NAPIER. ^i *• Neper then fliewcd him a nide draught of what he called Canon Mi' ** raii/is Logarithmorinn : which draught with fome alterations he prin- " ting in 1 6 14, it came forthv^ith into the hands of our author Briggs " and into thofe of Will. Oughtred, from whom the relation of this " matter came." This (lory is either entirely a ficflion, or much mifreprefented. There is no mention of it in Oughtred's writings *. There are no traces of the logarithms in the works of Longomontanns f , who was a vain maa and fui-vived Napier twenty nine years J, without ever claiming any- right to the invention of thofc numbers, which had for many years been univerfally ufed over Europe,- The following hypothefis may perhaps obviate the ftory of Anthc* ny Wood. Might not Craig, whom reafon and Tycho Brahe could not dived of the prejudices of the Arillotelian philofophy whlcli.he had imbibed, on returning to Edinburgh from Denmark, vifit Napier and tell him among other literary news that Longomontanus had invented a method of avoiding ti.e tedious operations of multiplication and divi- fion iu the foiution of triangles ? After getting the beft anfwers this dodlor could give to Napier's queries relative to this method, I per- ceive, fays the baron of Mercliirton, that Longomontanus hath inven- ted, improved, or Itolcn from the Furidamentum j/ijlronom'tcum^ the Prof- thaphscrefis of Raymar : but if you will. take the trouble of calling upon me • Oughtred's Clavis Math, Oxon i(^77i &c. \ Smith, Briggii vita, and "Ward's h'vcs. Axi, Briggs. X VoITuis (dc Nat. Aitiuci) cited Ky Vv'aid, places the death of Longomontanus in the year 1647. (^i L I r E, W R I T I N G S, A N D ine fomc time hence, I will fliew you a method of folving triangles by proportional numbers quite difUndl from this we have been talking of; "which method came into my head fome fhort time ago, and will re- quire many years intenfe thinking and labour to bring it to perfedion. Accordingly a few weeks afterwards, when Craig returned to Merchi- fton, Napier fhewed him the firft rude draught of the Canon Mir'tficus, Craig, having occafioii to write very foon after to Tycho Brahe, men- tioned to him tliis work without faying any thing about its author *. Justus Byrgius alfo, inftrument maker and aftronomer to the Land- grave of HefTe, a man of real and extraordinary merit, is faid by Kep- ler, in his I'abul^z Rudolpha^ to have made a difcovery of the Loga- rithms, previous to the publication of the Canon Mir'ificus. The paf- fage referred to is as follows : " Apices logiflici, Jufto Byrgio, multis annis ante editionem Nepeiranam, viam praeiverunt ad hos ipfifTimos logaritlimos (i. e. Briggianos) etfi homo cunclator et fecretorum fuorum cuflos, fxtum in partu deftituit, non ad ufos publicos educavit. That is the accents (', ", "', "", Sec. denoting minutes, feconds, thirds, fourths, &.C. of a circular arch) led Byrgius to the very fame logarithms (now in ufe) ^ many years before Napier s tjoork appeared: but Jiflus being indolent and re-- ferved (or jealous) "with regard to his own inventions ^forfook this his offspring (at or) in its birth ^ and trained it not up for public fervice. It * Nihil autem (writes Kepler to Cnigerus) fupra Ndpeiranam rationera efTe puto : etfi quidera, Scotus quidam, literis ad T)-chonem anno 1594, fcriptis, jam fpcm fecit Canonis lUius Mirifici. KepL Epift. a Gotthcb. Hantfch. foUo p. 460. f Thus Bj-rgiui mijjhi conceive Log. a" = o Log. a' = I Log. a" ■=. 2 tog. a"'= 3 &c « being any number kfs than €//. Sec alfo a part of a letter of R'Hhmanuus to Tytho Br.i'..'-- in Ci'l'.'-'' V^f. Tycli. 9' j4 L I F E, W R I T I N G S, &c. It is therefore upon clear and indubitable evidence that, cum de ali'u fere omnibus praclarh inventh pliires ' contendant gentes^ omnes Neperum loga- rUhmorum antborem agnofcunt qui tanti inventi gloria folus fine eemido fruitiir * ; while feveral nations contend for almofl every other famous invention, all agree in recognifing Napier as the unrivalled author of the loga- rithms, and as folely entitled to the glory of fo great a difcovery. SECTION Keil de Log. Prstf. SECTION IV. NAPIEr's method of constructing the LOCAHITHMIC CAHOH-i Had Napier's principal idea been to extend liis logarithms to all arith- metical operations whatever, he would have adapted them to the fcrics of natural numbers, i, 2, 3, 4, &c. In that cafe, having coniidcrcd the velocity of the two points as continmng the fame for a very fmall fpace of time, after fetting out from N and L (Fig. XL), he would have taken Nn itfelf as tlie logarithm of CN + Nn, or Cn. Now as Cn fur- pafTes CN or unity by a very fmall quantity, it is evident that, when raifed to its fucceflive powers, there will be found in the feveral pro- ducts fuch as are very near in value to the natural numbers i, 2, 3, 4, &c. agreeably therefore to the above theory (Sedl. III. prop. 9.) Nn be- ing eq\ial to d, and x being a politive integer, any natural number may be reprefented by (i+d)" and its logarithm in Napier's fyftem by xd. By this formula might the logarithms of all the primary numbers 3, 5, 7, &c. be calculated ; from wliich thofe of all the compofite numbers 4, 6, 8, 9, ID, &C. are ealily deduced by fimple additions (Se(5t. IIL prop. 7.) or by multiplications by 2, 3, 4, 5, Sec. (Sed. III. prop. 9), Napier's S6 LIFE, WRITINGS, and Napier's views were entirely confined to the facilitating of trigono- metrical calculations. This is the realbn of his calculating only the lo- garithms of the fines ; the log. of any given number being eafily de- duced from thefe by means of a proportion. In order to effed his purpofe, he confidercd that the radius, or fine total, being fuppofed to confift of an infinite number of infinitely fmall and equal parts,' all the; other fines would be found in the terms of a geometrical feries defcending from it to infinity ; and that the logarithm of the radius being fuppofed equal to zero, the logarithms of all the fe- ries, beginning with the radius, would be found in the terms of an a- rithmetlcal feries, afcending from zero to infinity by fleps equal to the logarithm of the ratio in which the geometrical feries defcends. Agreeably to this idea, he fuppofes the radiusrr CN=: looooooo, and firll conftrucls three tables, of which the firft contains a geometrical feries defcending from the radius to the hundredth term in the ratio of looooooo to 9999999. It is formed by a continual fubtradling, from the radius and every remainder, its loocooooth part. The decimals in every term are pufhed to the feventh place : a fpecimen of this table follows. 10000000 INVENTIONS OF NAPIER. ^S lOOOOOOO . ooooooo I . o.oooooo 9999999 . ooooooo 9999999 9999998 . 000000 1 999999B 9999997 . 0000003 9999997 9999996 . 0000006 raid fo on to 9999900 . 0004950 The fecond table contains a geometrical fcries dcfcending from the radius to the fiftieth term, in the ratio of 1 00000 to 99999, nearly tqual to that of the firfl term i ooooooo . ooooooo to the laft 9999900 . 0004950 of the firft table. It is formed by a continual fubtra(5ling, from the I'adius and every remainder, its 1 00000th part. The deci- mals are pufhed to the fixtli place. A fpecimen of tlus table follows. 1 0000000 . ooooooo 100 . cooooo 9f}r)999oo . 000000 99 • 999000 9999800 . ooiooo 99 . 998000 9999700 . 003000 99 • 997000 9999600 . 006000 and i'o on to 9995001 . 222927 P The «;« LIFE, WRITINGS, ano RADICAL TABLE. FIRST COLUMN. SECOND COLUMN. NATUSAL. lOOOOOOO . ocoo 9995000 . 0000 9990002 . 5000 9985007 . 4987 9980014 . 9950 and fo on to 9900473 . 5780 ARTIFICIAL. 5001 . 10002 . 2 5 15003 . 7 20005 • and fo on to 100025. II NATURAL. 9900000 9895050 9890102 9835157 9880219 and fo on to 9801468 . 8423 0000 0000 4750 4237 8451 and fo on to COLUMN 69. NATURAL. 5048858 5P4'53.^3 504381 1 5041289 3038768 and fo on to 499^6^9 . 4034 8900 46.5 2932 3879 7435 ARTIFICIAL. 6834225 68^ 9227 8 I 3 6 S and fo on to 6934250 . 8 684422S 6849229 685423; ARTIFICIAL. 100503 105504 110505 I 15507 120508 and fo on to 200528 . » The numbers and logarithms in the above table, coinciding nearlj^ •u'ith the natural and logarithmic fines of all the arcs from 90° to 30°, he was enabled, by means of prop. 16. or 1 7. an.l a table of the natural fines, to calculate the logarithmic fines to every minute of the laft 60° of the quadrant. In order to obtain the logarithms of the fines of arcs below 30°, he propofes two methods. The firfl is this. He multiplies any given fine of an arc lefs than ■go® by the number 2, 10, finding the logarithms of the numbers 2 and INVENTIONS o? NAPIER, ^ and lo by means of the radical table, or takes fome one of the com- pounds of thefe fo as to bring tae product within the compafs of thd radical tabic. Then having found, in the manner before defcribed, the logaritlun of this product, he adds to it the logarithm of the mul- tiple he had made ufe of; the ium is the logarithm ibught. The fecond method is derived from a property of the fines which he demonflrates. The property is tliis : Half the radius is to the fin6 of half an arc, as the fine of the complement of half that arc is to the fine of the whole arc. Hence, as is evident from a foregoing prop, that the logarithm of the fine of half an arc may be had by fubtradting the logarithm of the fine of the complement of half that arc from the fum of the logarithms of lialf the radius and of the fine of the whole arc. By this fecond method, which is much eafier than the firft, the lo- garithms of the fines of the arcs below 45° may be obtained ; thofe above 45° having been calculated by help of the radical table. The logarithms of the fines to every minute of the quidrant being found by the ingenious methods above defcribed, the logarithms of the tangents were eafily deduced by one fimple fubtrailion of the lo- garithm of the fine of the complement from that of the fine for each arc. The logarithm of the radius, which fo frequently occurs in tri- gonometrical folutions, having been very advantageoufly made equal to zero, the logarithms of all the tangents of arcs below 45° and of fill the fines muft have a dillcrent fign from that of the logarithms of (^ all ^ LIFE, WRITINGS, and all the tangents of arcs above 45°. Napier chofe the pofitlve fign for the former which he calls ahnudantes^ and the negative for the latter which he calls dcfeLl'tv'u The arrangement of the numbers in Napier's logarithmic table, is nearly the fame with that neat one which is flill in ufe. The natural and logarithmic fmes and the logarithmic tangent of an arc and of its complement ftand on the fame line of the page. The degrees are coni- tinucd forwards from 0° to 44° on the top, and backwards from 45? to 90° on the bottom of the pages. Each page contains feven columns ; the minutes defcend from o' (to 30' or from 30') to 60' in the firfl, and from 60' (to 30' or from 30') to o' in the lafl of thcfe colmnns. The natural fines of the arcs, on the left and on the right hand, occupy the fecond and fixth column, and their logarithms the tliird and fifth ra- lpe6tively. The fourth column contains the logarithms of the tangents which are taken pofitively if they refer to.th& arcs on the left, and ne- gatively if they refer to the aaxs on the right hand. A fpecimen of this table, is here, annejted. . Cr. INVENTIONS OP NAPIER. 6i Gr. 44 mi. SINUS. LOGARITIIMI. DIFFERENTIA. LOGARITHMl. SIMUS. 3^ 31 32 7--''>-y3 7CI1I67 701^24' 35J57'J7 3550808 3547^P «745-i' 168723 162905 3379226 3382085 3^84946 7'3i504 7130465 7128225 30 29 28 i3 34 3) 7^'5<'4 70173S7 7019459 3344^95 354'^9+> 35??9S9 157087 151269 •-I545' 338780S 3390672 3393537 7126385 7' 24:44 7122303 27 26 25 36 37 38 70:1530 7023601 7025671 3?33o^9 353= '42 »3'J'^33 ihS'4 i2;9-y4yo-'' 6y824 64OC6 5^,78 3430940 343?W29 3436730 7095708 7093658 7091607 12 1 1 10 5' 53 7052532 7354J94 70566; s 34919^3 348901.0 34861:9 52360 4^'543 40725 3439623 34425'7 34454' 3 70^9556 7087504 7CS5452 9 8 7 54 55 56 7058716 , 7060776 7062 3 S6 34«3^'9 3480301 34-7^^5 34'J-« 2.^0;o 2327? 344^3" 345'2" 3454"2 7i«3i99 70S1345 70-9291 6 5 4 57 58 59 70046^5 7066953 7069011 34V4-173 34755S7 3.68645 '7455 116,7 58. 8 3i570'5 34599-0 ^4'.2K>7 7077236 70;5i8i 7071 1 25 3 2 I Co 707 1000 34'^j7if 3465735 7071008 45 mi. Gr. In the Appendix to the Canonls mirif.cl coiijlnt^lo, Napier delivers three other methods of computing the logarithms ; but as thcfe methods are generally better adapted to the conflructloa of a fpecies of logarithms dillcrent from that I have defcribed, I fhall poftpone the account of them to the next fcdioa. Tin '^i L I F E, W R ! T I N G S, «ce. The ingenious method by which Napier conftruftcd the radical ta- ble is almoft peculiar to the fpecies of logarithms it contains : It does not feem, however, to be fufceptiblc of all the accuracy one would wilh ; for, notwithflanding the many precautions he had taken, particularly in pufliing his numbers to feveral decimal places, the logarithms in his canon often differ from the trutli by feveral units in the lail figure. Of this he himfelf was apprifed by finding different refults from the two methods of determining the logarithmic fmes of arcs xmder 30°. In or- der to remedy this defcdl, he propofes adding another zero to the radi- us ; by which means, in purfuing this fame method, the logarithms of the fines might be obtained true to an unit in the eight figure. SECTION SECTION V. / THE COMMON LOGARITHMS DEVISED BY NAPIER AND PREPARED B^ BRIGGS, AND THE METHODS PROPOSED BY NAPIER FOR COMPU- TING THEM. One capital difadvantage attending the fpecies of logaritlirtis which firft occurred to Napier, arifes from the difference between the fign of the logarithms of the tangents of arcs greater than 45° and the fign of the logarithms of the fines of all the arcs of the quadrant. This defecl was eafily remedied by fuppofing the fmallefl pofublc fine equal :o i and its logarithm o ; as in this cafe, the logarithms of all tlie fines and tangents of every arc in the quadrant would have the fame fign. But, if the fame fpecies of logarithms is made ufe of, the logarithm of the radius, which occurs fo frequently in trigonometrical folutions, would be a number difficult to be remembered. More, there- fore, would be lofh tlian gained by this alteration. What fpecies of lo- garitlxms will free us from a difference in the figns, and at the fame time afford a logarithm of the radius that fliall be eafiiy remembered and eafily managed ? It was tliis very queflion, in all probability, diat led to the common logarithms, which, of all others, are the beft adapted R to 64 L r r r, W R I T I N G S, A K D to our modern arithmetical notation. This fyflcm of logarithms has for its bafis i as logarithm of tlie ratio of lo to i : i'o that the powers r,. lo, I oo, I GOO, 8cc. of the nvimber i o have their refpe6live logarithms o, 1, 2, 3, Sec, * Here, by the bye, it miay be obferved, that not only- Napier's manner of conceiving the generation of the logarithms, but his having computed that fpecies of logarithms, wluch has been dif- cribed, before the common logarithms occurred to liim, // a convincing proof of his not taking the. bint of the logarithms from the remark of Stijellius^ formerly mentioned. I think it is even beyond doubt that Napier,, in common with all other arithmeticians acquainted with the Arabic, or rather Indian figures, had obferved that the produft of any power of tlie number lo by any other power of that number, was formed by- joining or adding the zeros in the one to thofe in the other ; and tiiat the quotient of any one power of that number by any other, was for- med by taking aviray or defacing a number of zeros in the dividend e- qual to the number of zeros in the divifion ; and all this without think- ing that he was, at that time, making the fundamental remark of the logarithms. Nor will this feem at all furpriling to thofe who are ac- quainted with the hiftory of fcience and of the human mind. It is fel- dom that -we direcTcly arrive at truth by the moll natural and cafy path; Perhaps * "W-fi haTtfcen Se£l. III. that in Napier's (j-ftem the velocity of the two moveable points in N and L Fig. XI. is equal and that the logarithm (LI)" of .any number (CN+Nn)^ or 1.0000000,1 )■< is neart- ly equal to (Nn)" or [.ocoooco,i]* In the common fyftem the velocity at L is lefs than the half of the velocity at N; and the logarithm LI of the number [CN-|-Nn]>; [or 1.0000000,13^ is ncaily equal [0.4342945] NnXx or [0.0000000,0434,2945]"= for in making this fuppofition the logarithm of 10, is found to be 1. The logarithms therefore in Napier's fyftem are to the corrcfpondent one* in the common fyftem as i is to o. 4342945 or, what is the fame thing the common logarithms ar« to tbofe of Napier as 1 is to 2.3025S51. INVENTIONS or NAIPER. 65 Perhaps the ftrongefl mark of the greatncfs of Napier's genius is not his inventing the logarithms, but his manner of invendng them. But to return; In this new fyftem the radius was made equal to the roth power looooooQOOo of the number 10, of wliich the logarithm in tlic new fcale is 10. The divifion of the radius into fo great a number of parts, render the fine of the fmalieft feniible arc greater than 1, of which the logarithm is zero : confequcntly, the logarithms of all tlvc fines and tangents of the arc3 of tlie quadrant, being on the fame fide of zero, have the fame fign. With regard to the logarithm of the radius, its being cafily mana- ged is fujQlciently obvious. Thus in our common logarithms the difadvantagcs of Napier's fyftem are avoided, whilft its advantages ai'e retained and united to feveral otiiers. Of thefe additional advantages in the common canon, tlic mod capital is, that the units in the firft figure (to which Briggs gave the name of charadleriflic) of the logarithm are fewer by one than the figures of the number to which that logarithni corrcfponds. Whether Napier, or Briggs,^/)'? imagined this newfpecies of log** jithnis, is a queftion which the learned do not feem as yet to have per- ft<^ly decided. The only evidence we have on which a decilion can be grounded, 1» Contained in the following paiticdarsr I, 6^ L I F E, W R I T I N G S, A N D I. In a letter to Uflier afterwards Archbifhop of Armagh dated the loth of March 1615, the year after the pubhcation of Napier's Canon. Biiggs -writes thus *, " Napier lord of Merchiflon hath fet my head *' and hand at work with his new and adiTiirable logarithms : I hope •* to iee him this fummer if it pleafe God ; for I never faw a book •* which pleafed me better, and made mc more wonder." II. In the dedication of his Rabdologia, publifhed 161 7, Napier has the following words, " Atquc hoc mihi fini propofito, logarithmorum *' canonem a me longo tempore elaboratum fuperioribus annis edendum *' curavi, qui reje<51is naturalibus numeris, ct operationibus quce per " eos Hunt, difiicilioribus, alios fubllituit idem praeftantes per faciles " addtiones, fubflracliones, bipartitiones, et tripartitiones. Quorum " quidem logarithmoi-um y^m^/w aliain multo pr^ftantiorem nunc etiam in- *!* venimus, et creandi methodum, una ciun eorum ufu (fi Deus lon- " giorem vitx et valetudinis ufuram conceflcrit) evulgare ftatuimus : Vipfam autem novi canonis fupputationem, ob infirmam corporis noftri V jraletudinem, viris in hoc iludii genere verfatis relinquimus : impri- " mis vero docliillmo viro D. Henrico Briggio Londini publico Gco- *' metric ProfclTori, et amico mihi longe charifllmo". • . Ill, In the preface to the logaritbmoruvi cbilias primay a table of the common logarithms of the firft thoufand natjiral members, Briggs ex* prefles himfelf in the following terms ; " Why thefe logarithms differ ** from thofe fet forth by their illuflrious inventor, of ever refpedful *' memory, in his canon mirlficus^ it is to be hoped, his polthumous wor^ f* will fhortly make appear." IV. • The life of Archbifnop Ulher and his conefpondencc, by Richard Par, D. D. 1686. folio, f age. 36. INVENTIONS OF NAPIER. 67 IV. In the preface the Arithmetica Logarithmeca *, there is the fol- lowing paragraph, " Quod hi logarithm! diverii funt (writes Briggs) al> " iis quos clarilfimus vir bare Merchiftonii in fuo edidit canonc mirifi- " CO, non ell quod mireri, enim meis auditoribus Londini publice in " Collcgio Greftiamcnfi horum dodlrinam explicarem; animadverti mul- " to futurum commodius, fi logarithmus finus totius fervxtur o zero " (ut in canone mirifico) logarithmis autem partii decima: ejufdem finus *' totius, nempe finus 5 grad. 44 min. 21. fecund. elTet 1.00000,00000: " atque ea de re fcripfi flatim ad ipfum, Authorem, et quamprlmum ** hie anni tempus, et vacatloneni a publico docendi munere licuit, " profedlus fum Edinburgum ; ubi humaniilime ab eo acceptus hxG. *' per integrum mcnfem. Cum autem inter nos de horum mutationc ** fermo haberetur ; Ilk fc idem dudum finfijfe^ et capuifTe dicebat : vc- " runtamen iflos, quos jam paraverat, edendos curafTc, donee alios, fi '* per negotia et valetudinem liceret, niagis commodos confccifTtt. If- " tarn autem mutationem ita faciendam cenfebat, ut o eiTet logarithmus " unitatis et i ,00000 . 00000 finus totius : quod ego longe commodifli- " mum efTe non potui non agnofcere". " Capi igitur ejus hortatu, rc- " je<5lis illis quos antea paraveram, de horum calculo ferio cogitarc, et '* fequenti aeftate iterum profe(Slus Edinburgum, horum quos hie cxhi- " beo praecipuos, illi oflendi. Idem etiam tertia jefbite libentiflime fac- " turns, fi Deus ilium noBis tamdiu fuperftitem cfTe voluifTet f." It may here be obfcrved, that the manner in which Briggs propofed the application of the common logarithms to trigonometrical purpofes, S did • Publifhed in 1624. •f Ulacg in his title page to his edition of Bngg's log. Trrites to the fame purport. " IIos cumerM " primiv inucnit clarifllmus vir Jo. Rudolph. 1627. f LogarithnK) tecUnia, 1668, J Phil. Trana. 1695. || Hnrraonia Mcnfurar. 1722. 74 LIFE, W R I T I N G S, and or uuliy : And, if the quotient of two quantities is taken as the meafure of their ratio, the definition is rendered more fimple, and x will be the logarithm of c"- Upon this principle is founded the analytical theory of the logarithms in the appendix:. It was chiefly by the two lafl rficthods, defcribed in the foregoing fe(flion, that Briggs conflrucflcd his logarithms. He invented alfo an original method of conflrucfling logarithms by means of the firft, fecond, third, SvC. diiTerences of given logarithms. How he came by it is not known. He dcfcribes it in his arithmetica logarithmica and there is a demonflration of it in Cotcs*s Harmonia, in Bertrand's Mathematiqucs, and in the works of a great many other authors. EcMUKD Gxmter, Profcffor of Aflronomy in Grefliam College, who "was the fir/l that publifhed a table of the logarithmic fines and tangenti of that kind which Napier and Eriggs had lafl agreed on, applied, in the year 1623, or 1624, the Icgarithras to a ruler which bears his name. This fcale is of very great ufe in Navigation, and in all the pradlical parts of geometry where much accuracy is not required. On the ac- count of this logarithmical invention, Gunter, after Napier and Eriggs, has the befl claim to the public gratitude. ArTEX Napier's death almoft fifty years elapfed before the invention! of the exprefHons of the logarithms by infinite feriefes. Of thefe the three following, from which a great number of others are eafily deri- \-ed, were the firfl. * liOgarithiA • Appendiis; an. A. lojf, INVENTIONS OF NAPIER. 7; Logarithm of {i-\-a)=a — ^^*+t^'+^c. ----- X Logarithm of (i — a)= — a — ^a^ — ^a' — 8cc. Y Logarithm of (^^^^) =a-^W +1^' +Scc, - Z These formulae X, Y, and Z will converge the more quickly in pro^- portion as a is fuppoled lefs than unity ; and the fum of a few terms will generally fufEce. They are the values of Napier's logarithms, but will reprefent every fpecies of logarithms by being multiplied by an indeterminate quantity 2/, which is called the modulus of the fyftem. The forxnula X was invented by Nicholas Mercator in the year 1667, and publiflied in his Logarlthmotechn'ta the year following. Gregory of St Vincent, about twenty years before, had lliewn that one of the afymp- totes of the hyperbola being divided in geometrical progreflion, its ordi- nates parallel to the other afymptote are drawn from the point of divi- vifion, they will divide into equal portions the fpaces contained be- tween the afymptote and the curve : From this it was afterwar'434^ 9947 2S76 5S02 8727 0240 3 '68 6095 o53< 3461 6387 93" 0826 3754 6680 9604 I (K; 4046 ^972 9S96 1357 4278 :'y7 1649 4570 7488 9019 19 + 1 4S62 7780 2233 5'54 8072 2526 5446 8364 2818 5737 8655 OIl:{ 0405 0697 Ory8» 1280 1571 3028 • 3320 3''i ' 3903 4194 • 41^5 4 5 6 7 8 9 diff. part. .^ ■47 (J .76 7 205 H ■iS '93 V '05 I ZJ 2 j» 3 U - 4 iW .■i Mr 6 176 7 20J 19a i »J4 '9 9 ><>4 !« iiii iir m6- TAB. DES LOG. DES SIN. ET TANG. 12 DEC. I ff 20 10 20 30 40' 50 21 10 20 » * J • fin. 9.32959.88 9.32969.50 9.329-9. 13 9.329S8.75 9.32998.38 9.33008. 00 9.33017.61 9.33027.23 9.33036.84 dm: 962 963 962 963 962 961 962 961 co-fm. 9.98985.97 9.98985.51 9.98985. 04 9.98984.58 9.9R984 9.98983 9.98983, 20 , t2 ,66 9.98982. 74 9.98982.28 diff. 46 47 46 46 ..16 46 46 46 , I " CO-flll. diff. Cn. diff. 9-33973-9' 9.33984.00 9- 33994- C9 9.34004. 17 9. •54014. 25 9-34024-33 9.34034.41 9.34044.49 9.34054.56 1009 1009 1008 1008 1008 icoS icc8 1007 CO- tang. diff. co-laiig. II 0.66026. 09 0.66016.00 <;< 0.66005. 91 40 c. 65995. 83 30 o.fi5985.*75 20 0.65975.67 10 0.65965.59 0.65955.51 50 0.65945.44 40 tang. I 48 39 77 DEC. TilESB INVENTIONS OF NAPIER. S5 These Tables, which are executed with a new and elegant type on good paper, form a fmall odlavo volume. There is every probability in favors of their corre<5lnefs. They are copied from the London edi- tion of Gardiner printed in 1742, which is in the hlghcft cftimation for that quality. Ivlcflieurs Callet. Leveque and Prud'homme, three good mathematicians, revifed the proof Iheets, as did alfo the editor M. Jombert three feveral times. M. Didot fenr. the printer formed the models of the types and founded them on purpofe, and the editor avers that, during tlic courfe of the imprefhon, none of the figures came out of their place; a precious advantage which he imputes to the juflnefs of the principles that M. Didot has eflabliflied in his foundery. There is an additional improvement, which I am furprlfed none of the editors of our common logarithms has thought of making. What I allude to is the uniting, to the tables of the logarithms of the natural nximbers and of the fines and cofmes, the logarithms of their recipro- cals (their aritlimetical complements *, as they are called). By this means, all the common operations by logarithms might be performed by addition only, without any trouble. The logarithms of the natural numbers might be dlfpofcd on the left hand, and thofe of their recipro- cals on the right hand pages. The charafteriflics of the latter, being equal to the difference between 10 and the number of integral figures iii the natural numbers, woiild be as cafily found as thofe of the former. The logarithms of the reciprocals of the fines and cofmes might, in each page, be put in the fame line with the logarithms of the fines and cofines, having* * ITie arithmetical complements of iLc logaritlims were Gift thought of by John Spccdcll, who,- in Lis //."ui logarilbmt firft puLlilVicJ in 1^)19, and feveral times aftcnvards, awijtd the incoDvcuicocc •f the figns in Napicri logarithms by that contrivance. S6 LIFE, WRITINGS, and having their common differences between them, as the logarithms of the tangents and cotangents, wliich arc reciprocals of each other, have theirs. It is very likely that the prefcnt edition of the Tables portativcs will foon be exhaufted. If, in a fecond edition, M. Jombert adopts the propofed amelioration, he will do an effcntial fervice to the communi- ty. I . The computation might be accompliflied, by a good arithmetici- an, in little more than [three hours labour every day for half a year. 2. The type and length of the page being the fame, the book would be little more than a fourth part thicker, and would flill be of a convenient fue. In the month of May, 17S4, there were publiflied propofals fpr publifliing, by fvibfcription, A 'Table of Logarithmic fines and tangents^ ta 'en at fight to every fecond of the quadrant^ accurately computed to feven places off- gures befides the index : to ivblcb ivill be prefixed a table of the logarithms of numbers from i to 1 00000, infcribcd^ by permiffion^ to the right honourable and honourable the Comm'ffioners of the Board of Longitude^ by Michael Taylor^ one of the computers of the Nautical Ephemeris, and author of a Sexage/imal Table ^ publ'ffjed by order of the Commiffioners of the Board of Longitude. The plan of this work was fvibmitted to the Board of Longitude, who came to a re- folution to give Mr Taylor a gratuity of three hundred pounds flerling towards defraying the expence of printing and publifliing it. This cir- cumftance ought to be a fufficient recommendation of Mr Taylor, and it is to be hoped, that his laborious and ufeful undertaking will meet with the encouyagement and recompence from the public which it fo Juflly deferves. In the fpecimen annexed to the propofals, the degrees being as ufual at the top and bottom of the page, tlie feconds occupy the INVENTIONS OF NAPIER. 79 ciples of common Algebra independently of any curve. He was tlie firfl alfo, if I n:iillake not, that gave the general feries for computing the numbers correfponding to given logarithms *. The analytical the- ory of logarithms, in the Appendix, is nearly on Halley's plan, but was materially finiflicd before the author faw his treatife. To defcribe, or enumerate, all the tables of logarithms, which have been publiflied fmce the invention of thefe numbers, would be tedious and ufelcfs, and indeed next to impoffiblc. We Ihall reftricl ourfelves to thofe which are tlie mod confiderable and the moft ufcful. In the year 1624, Benjamin Urfmus, mathematician to the Ele 8o L I F E, W R I T I N G S, A N »' iiifimtoriim^ there is a Imall table of the firft ten natural numbers witH. their logaritlims to twenty fix places ; and, in Bertrand's work formerly mentioned, there are the logarithms of a great many of the firfl hun- dred, natural numbers, and of feveral others, to the fame number of pla- ces. Some of thefe differ from the truth, by fome units only, in the laft figure, and the logarithm of 6 1 is wrong in the fixtecnth figure from the left hand. In the Appendix there is a table of Napier's logarithms of the firft hundred and. one natural numbers to twenty fevcn places. - In the year 1624, Briggs publKhed at London his Aritbmetka Logcr- rhhmica. This work contains Briggs' or the common logarithms, and their differences, of all the natural numbers from i to 20000, and from 90000 to 1 00000 to fifteen places, including the index or characleriflic. In fome copies, of which there is one in the Library of the Univerfity of Edinburgh, there is added the logarithms of the numbers from 1 00000 to loiooo, which Briggs had computed after the former had been printed off. Before his death, which happened in 1630, this au* thor completed alfo a table of the logarithmic fines and tangents to fif- teen places, for the hundredth" part of every degree of the quadrant, and joined with it the natural fines, tangents, and fecants, which he had be- fore calculated. This work which Briggs had committed to the care of Henry Gellibrand, at that time profeffor of aflronomy in Grefham College, was tranfmitted to Gouda, where it was printed under the in- fpe(flion of Ulacq, and was publifhed at London in 1633, with the title of Trigonometr'ia Br'ilann'ica. ThesB" tables of Briggs' have not been equalled, for their extenfive- ncfs and accuracy together ; thofe of his' logaritlims that have been re- examined INVENTIONS OF NAPIER. tt examined having feldom been found to differ from the truth by more than a few units in the fifteenth figure. In the year 162S, Adrian Ulacq of Gouda, in Holland, after filling up the gap betwixt 20000 and 90000, which Briggs had left, repub- Ulhed the Aritbmctica Lagar'ithmica^ together with a table of the loga- rithmic fines, tangents, and fecants, to every minute of the quadrant. Some years afterwards, he publillaed his 'Trigonometria Artificiality con- taining Briggs' logarithms of the firfl: twenty thoufand natural num- bers, and the logarithmic fines and tangents, witli their differences for every ten feconds of the quadrant. In both thefe works, the logarithms are carried to the eleventh place including the index, and are held in much eftiniation for their corrednefs. Abraham Sharp, of YorkHaire, publifhed with his Geometry Improved^ in 1 7 1 7, a table containing Briggs' logarithms of the firfl hiindred na- tural numbers, and of all the prime numbers from 100, to 1 100 and of all the numbers from 9999S0 to 1000020, to fixty two places including the charaderiftic. There is the greatefl probability of all tlicfe loga- rithms being correal. The laft forty-one [from 999980 to 1000020] ■were verified afterwards by Gardiner. Tables of the logarithms, carried to fo great a number of places as thofe of Sharp, Briggs, and Ulacq, are feldom ufed ; tlic logarithms to eight places inclufive of the charaifleriflic being fuflicient for all com- mon purpofcs. The moft ufcful tables are thofe which have the loga- rithms corrc(5t to the ncarcfl unit in the eight figure, difpofed fo as to take 8:^ L I F E, W R I T I N G S, AND tAkc up little room, and, at the fame time, to afford the eaileft and moft Ipeedy means of finding the intermediate logarithms, or numbers cor- refponding to given numbers or logarithms The form of the ta- bles bed adapted to anfwer thcfe purpofes was firfl introduced by Na- thaniel Roe, a clergyman in Suffolk, in his Tabula Logarithm'ica, print- ed at London in 1633. This form was improved by John Newton, in his Trigotiometria BrUannlca publiflied at London in 1658, and by Sher- win in his Mathematical Tables, of which the firil edition was printed iri 1 705. It has received additional improvements in Mr Callet'$ edition of Gardiner's Tables printed at Paris in 1783. * The difpofiton of the tables is as follows : Each page of the logarithms of the natural numbers is divided into twelve columns. The firfl co- lumn, titled N at top and bottom, contains the natural number. In rhc fecond column, marked O, are the logarithms, without the charac- teriflic, of thefe numbers ; the three firft figures, belonging to the lo- garithms of more numbers than one, arc fcparated by a point from the other four figures of the logarithm of the firjl of thefe numbers and are left out before the other four figures of the logarithms of the reft. In each line of the next nine columns, marked with the nine Cgnificant digits I, 2, 3, &.C. are four figures, which, united to the firll three ifola- ted figures of the fecond column in the fame line with them, or above them, • Tables poitatives de Logaritluncs, publices a Londrcs par Gardiner, Angmentec ct perfe'=:yLx therefore Lz z • • _^— — z • * vx * = yLx that is — = yLx+ y Lx = — -|-yLx, and therefore 7'p' — X X — . Hence it is evident that the relation of x to y, that is, y X -|- ^y Lx the Equation to the curve SMM' being given, the fluxion of y may be exprcfl'ed by fome fundlion of x, and Its fluxion may be obtained; which X x value of the fluxion of y being fubfliituted in the fradllon — : '- — ; y X -f- X y Lx and the fluxion of x expunged from its numerator and denominator, there will be obtained a finite cxprcflion of the fubtangent r'p' of the curve 94 LIFE, WRITINGS, and curve c-y.u.'. For example, lee the cui"ve SMM' be tlie logarltlinilc : we ' - r " . - have yzr Lx * : therefore y = — ; therefore r 'p' =—;:^ — • From the 'V art X^^ value of the fubtangenc and from the equation (z z=x"^ to the curve o-jj^jjiJ a great many of its properties are eajQIy deduced. The ordinate Sir at the fummit of the curve is equal to the abcifs CS : for y=Lx=o and z^^x" =::K^S. The tangent at the point =— --; therefore L*x=i and Lx::=-y=i The ciirve ^c* ^' equal to 0.69314 718, Napier's logarithm of the number 2. SECTION SECTION VIII. Napier's improvements in the theory of trigonometry. VV E obferved before that the Arabs, fetting afide the chords of the double arcs, which rendered Trigonometry very complicated among the ancients, made ufe of the halves of thefe chords to which they gave the name of the Sinus. To that ingenious people \\c owe alfb the three theorems which are the foundation of our modern fpherical trigonome- try. By thefe theorems all the cafes of rc(fl:angular fpherical triangles and all the cafes of oblique fpherical triangles may be refolved, except- ing when the three fides, or the three angles only, are the data. It was Regiomontanus who firfl invented two theorems for the folution of thefe two cafes : by which means the theory of trigonometry was per- fccfhed. One of thefe theorems which ferves for finding an angle fi-om the three fides is, The reSlangle under theftnes of the two fides of any fpheri- cal triangle is to the fqnare of the radius ; as the deference of the verfcd fines of the bafe and the difference of the two fides is to the verfcd fine of the vertical angle. The other theorem, of itfelf, is not fufficient for the purpofe of finding a fide from the three angles. This 98 L 1 r E, WRITINGS, and This lafl cafe, however, may be refolved into the former by means ot the fupplemental triangle, fo called becaufe its fides are the fupplements of the angles of tlie other. This invention is due to Bartholomus Pi- tifcus *, who liourifhcd in the beginning of the feventeenth century. The improvements made by Napier on this fubjecfl are chiefly three. I. The general rule for tlic folution of all the cafes of rectangu- lar fpherical triangles, and of all the cafes of oblique fpherical triangles, excepting the two formerly mentioned. 2. A fundamental theorem by wliich the fcgments of the bafe, formed by a perpendicular drawn from the vertical angle, may be found, the three fides being given. This, with the foregoing and the property of the fupplemental triangle, fervcs for the folution of all the cafes of fpherical triangles. 3. Two propor- tions for finding by one operation both the extremes, the three middle of five contiguous parts of a fpherical triangle being given. These theorems arc announced by Napier in terms to the following import : I. Of the circular parts of a rectangular or quadrantal fpherical tri- angle. The 7-eEl angle under the radius and the fine of the middle part is equal to the rectangle under the tatigcnts of the adjacent parts and to the reElanglc un- der the cofines of the oppofitc parts. The right angle or quadrant fide be- ing negle(fted, the two fides and the complements of the other three natural parts are called the circular parts ; as they follow each other as it * Pitifco aliquid tribuo in fUTsAan arcuum in angulos, et vicifliir.. Kep. Epift. 29J. 'INVENTIONS OF NAPIER. 99 it were in a circular order. Of thefe any one being fixed upon as die middle part, thofe next to it are the adjacent, and thofe farthefl: from it, the oppofite parts. 2. "Tbe reS! angle under the tangents of half the fum and half the difference of the fegments formed at the bafe by a perpendicular drawn to it from the vertical angle of any fphcrical triangle^ is equal to the re^angle under the tan^ gents of half the fum and half the dfference of the two fides. 3. 'The fines of half the fum and half the dfference of the angles at the bafe of any fpherical triangle are proportional to the tangents of the half bafe and half the dfference of the fides. 4. The cofines of half the fum and half the dfference of the angles of the bafe of Mn\ fpherical triangle^ are proportional to the tangents of half the bafe and half the fum of the fides. Napier gives alfo the two following theorems for finding an angle, the three fides of any fpherical triangle being given. 5. The rc^ angle under the fines of the two fides is to the re^ angle under the fines of half the fan and half the dfference of the bafe and the difference of the two fides, as thefquare of the radius is to the fquare of the fine of half the vertical angle.' C). The rectangle under the fines of the two fides is to the rectangle under ihefncs of half the fum and half difference of the fum of the two fides and the bafe, as thefquare of the radius is to thefquare of the cofme of the vertical angle, C c Fox loo L I F E, W R I T I N G S, A N D For the demon ftration of the vartous cafes of the firft of thefe fix propolltions, he refers to the elementary books on trigonometry then in ufe. This propofition is not fo fufccptible of a dire<5l demonlbatlon. The dcmonflration perhaps the neareft to a dired one is given in the appendix ; of -which dcmonflration the liint is taken from Napier. His demonftration of the fecond propofition is extremely elegant and of an uncommon call. The reader on thefe accounts, it is prefumed, will be very glad toj'cc the fubllance of it ; which is as follows : Let a plane NJN (Fig. XIII.) touch the fphere ADP at the point A, the extremity of its diameter PA. Upon the furface of the fphere lee there be dcfcribed the triangle AXy acute in 7, or Ax^ obtufe in S^ Let the fme A>. and the bafe Ay or AS be produced to the point P. With the pole X and dirtance Xy or its equal xS let the fmall circle of the fphere Cyu interfedling xP in e and xA in s be defcribed : and' from X let the arc X^> be drawn perpendicular to ACy. Ay is the fum of the fegments of the bafe and A^ their difference. Ae is the fum of the fides and At their difference. Let there be fuppofed a luminous point in P : The Ihadows, A, b, and c, of the points A, S and 7, upon the plane MN, are in the fame flraight line, becaufe the points A, ^, 7 and P are in the fame circular plane : alfo the fhadow A, d and e, of A, i and e, upon the plane MN, are in the fame fcraight line, becaufe A, J, s and P are in the fame circular plane. Since PA is perpendicular to the plane MN, the plane triangles PAc, PAb, PAe and PAd are red- angular in A : therefore, to the radius PA, the flraight lines Ac, Ab, Ae and Ad, are the tangents of the angles APc or AP7, APb or AFC, APc INVENTIONS OF NAPIER. loi APe or Ap6 and APd or APj rcfpeclively. But thefe angles, being at the circumference of the fphere, have for their meafures the halves of the arcs intercepted by their fides : therefore Ac, Ab, Ae and Ad are the tan- gents of die halves of A7, Ab, As and At refpedively. Now (by optics) the fliadow of any circle, defcribed on the furface of the fphere, pro- duced by rays from a luminous point fituated in any point of that fur- face excepting the circumference of the circle, forms a circle on the plane perpendicular to the diameter at whofe extremity the luminous point is placed : therefore the points c, b, e and d are in the circumfe- rence of a circle : therefore Ac X Abr=Ae X Ad. (^E. D. The third and fourth propofitions are not dcmonflrated by Napier. He probably deduced them from the fecond in a manner fimilar to that in the appendix ; where the reader will find all of thefe and fome other theorems of the fiime kind, demonilrated. Napier had left the third propofition under a clumfy form. It was put into the form above given by Briggs in his Lucubmtmtes annexed to the Canoms Mirifici Con- f.ru£lio. This circumftance is not the fule mark of this work being a p/ofthumous publication. The fifth propofition is deduced by Napier from the theorem of Re- giomontanus, and it is likely he derived the fixth from tlic fame Iburce. To thefe two theorems the logarithms are much more applicable than to that of Regiomontanus. Since Napier's time the chief improvement made in the theory of- tiigonometry is the application or the calculus of lluxions to it; for >vluch we are indebted to Cotes.. M.. 102 LIFE, WRITINGS, and M. PiNGRE, in the Mcmoires de mathematique et ds pbyfique for the year 175C, reduces the folutloa of all the cafes of fpherical triangles to four analogies. Thcfe four analogies are in fad, under another form, Napi- er's Rule of the circular parts and his fccond or fundamental theorem, ■with its application to the fupplemental triangle. Although it would be no dliljcult matter to get by heart the four analogies of M. Pingre, yet there arc few bleiled with a memory capable of retaining them for any confiderable time. For this reafbn, the rule for the circular parts, ought to be kept- under its prefent form. If the reader attends to the circumflance of the fccond letters of the words tangents and coftnes being the fame with the firft of the words adjacent and oppofite^ he will find it almoft impollible to forget the riile. And the rule for the folution of the two cafes of fpherical triangles, for which the former of itfelf is inflifTicient, may be thus expreflcd : Of the circular parts of an ohliqiis fpherical triangle^ the reti angle under the tangents of half the fum and half the difference of the fegments at the middle part (formed by a perpendi- cular drawn from an angle to the oppofitc fide), is equal to the reElangle under the tangents of half the fum and half the difference of the oppofite parts. By the circular parts of an oblique fpherical triangle are meant its three fides and xhc fupplcments of its three angles. Any of thefc fix being af- fumcd as a middle part, the oppofite parts are thofc two of the fame denomination with it, that is, if the middle part is one of the fides, tlie oppofite parts are the other two, and, if the middle part is the fupplement of one of the angles, the oppofite parts are the fupplement of the other two. Since every plane triangle may be confidered as defcribed on the furface of a fphere of an infinite radius, thefe two rules may be applied to plan? triangles, provided the middle part be reftrided to ^ftdc. Thus INVENTIONS OF NAPIER, 103 Thus it appears that two fimple rules fuffice for the fohition of all the poflible cafes of plane and fpherical triangles. Thefe rules, from their neatnefs and the manner in which they are expreffed, cannot fail of engraving themfelves deeply on the memory of every one who is a little verfed in trigonometry. It is a circumftance worthy of notice that a perfon of a very weak memory may carry the whole art of tii- gonometry in his head. D d APPENDIX. APPENDIX. ANALYTICAL THEORY OF THE LOGARITHMS. I. XjET the confecutive terhis of an infinite geometrical progreilion differ infinitely little one from another; it is. evident that, any deter- mined quantity c greater than unity being the bafis of the progrefTion, there will be fome term f *=;« any given quantity. 2. The exponents of the terms of that progrefTion are faid to be the logarithms of thofc terms : Thus the fymbol L denoting the logarithm of the quantity to which it is prefixed, Lr*''=rt:x. Hence if c"'-=zm ; then Ijm=x and L— ^ — x= — L;;/. THEOREM T. 3. Ibe logar'ithvi of a prodiiSl is equal to the fiim of the logarithms cf its factors. For fmce Y.c''= x and hc^^^z (2), it follows that he' •{-L.c-==x +s; but .v + ^=Lr'+-' (2) :=Lc'Xr: therefore Lr'' Xr=L^*-;-Lr^ Hence if c'=m and c'=/i (i) ; then Lww^^Lw-f-L" and L^^=Lot — L'/. THEOREM. io6 A P P E N D I X. THEOREM II. 4, The hgarithm of a power is equal to the produEl of its exponent hy the logarithm of its root. For, fince Lc *=.v, it follows that }iLc''=nx ; but «A=: Lf"( 2), therefore Lf'"=«Lc\ Hence if c'^^wz, then Lot"=«Lw. PROBLEM I. 5. To exhibit the logarithm of a given number. Since c°=i, if d is an infinitely fmall quantity and ^o. any finite quantity, it is evident that /=i +1. Now L/^r^ (2), therefore ^=rL(i +^), therefore /V=/L(i + ^)=L(i +;;)'■ (4). Let (i+^)'=i+^; we have /V=//^(i-t-^)v— />: therefore, developing the furd quantity (i+^)t, making /=:oo, and re- ducing L(i+«)=^(^-4+^&e) X Hence, if ^2 is negative, L(i-«)=-/.(a+^+f +&C) Y Hence, by fubtrading Y from X 6. The above formulae are of no ufe for the calculation of the loga- rithms if a is fuppofed an integer. Let therefore m and n be any pofitive numbers, m being greater tlian n ; and ^mo. Let a=^, then 1+^=^, ^-a=^^ and-i±l^^, and the formulas X, Y, and Z become, by fubftitution. A, B, and C. APPENDIX. 1C7 L(i^)=L(«;-;;)-L;.=-^.(^+,-^+3^.+&c) B 2^01. Let a=:~—; then i — a ~~ - " ■-, and the formula Y becomes D L(-^) =hm—Um + ;/) -—u,i-^ -j-^^, +-r-~. +Scc) D T,lio. Let fl = — ^; then i — ^zr— 4— , and the formula Y becomes E L(-^) =L//— L(;« + ;/) -—uX-J^ + .^4_, + -^-^, + 8cc) - E 4/c. Let a-=z ^^ ; then -ji^=-!^±^, and the formula Z becomes F L-::ii^=L(w + «)— L»? = 2a(^V + 7^T:rT3 + -7-^— + Scc) F m \. ■ / I Vjm-J-« 3','''"+") J(»"'+"^' ' c/0. Letrt=— ^; then '+"=1^!!-, and the formula Z becomes G L(-^) = L?n—L (m—;i) = 2u,(-^-.+ — ^,t+ . "' ,, + 8cc) G 6/0. Let azz^" : thenl±:l = ^ and the formula Z becomes H L^ = L;«-L;;=:2.4(^) + '(,:5^)'+,'.(^)'-f&c) - - H 'jmo. Let -^be fubftituted for - in the formula B : let this new formu- / iti - til la be divided by f; and Let h[m' — //') or L[m-{-f/)-{-L)in — nzza- and L[m-{-!i)L.{m-= — ;/) s : then fliall REMARKS. 7. Of three quantities 771 — //, ;/; and /«+"» ^^ arithmetical progreflion, tlic logarithm of the fecond, being given the logarithms of the other two may be found by one operation, if the odd and even powers of -^in the fcricfcs A and R arc calculated apart. E c 8. io8 APPENDIX. 8. If n is fuppofcd equal to unity, and if jt* (the modulus of the fyftem of logarithms to be afterwards determined), confifts of a great number of figures, it will be much more convenient, in calculating by the feriefes A, B, C, D, F, and G, to confider ^. as the numerator of each term than as the multiplier of the fum of the terms. 9. The firfl flep -^^"- of the feries F will give the logarithms of all numbers greater than 20000 true to fifteen places, if thofe of all num- bers lefs than 20000 are given, and if 2/x.« does not exceed a few units. 10. The firfl ftep t +-^ of the feries i will give the logarithms of all numbers. greater than loooo true to nineteen places, if thofe of all numbers lefs than loooo are given, and if?; does not exceed a few units. The reader will eafily fee that the logarithm of all numbers below VI being known, that of ^±^ and confequently that of m-\-n and there- fore (T as well as ; will be known. 1 1. Various methods might be taken to compute with eafe the lo- garithms of the lower prime numbers. The logarithms, for example, of about two tliirds of the primes under 1 00 may be obtained with lit- tle trouble from a table of the continual halfs of the modulus, n being = I. The infpedion of the following table will make this evident. given APPENDIX. 109 given Ifought 1 ^ fcriet 1 ' W-f-I m — I the logar of. I 2 2 I B 2 3 2 3 A 2 and 3 5 2' 5 3 C 2 and 3 7 2' 3' 7 C 2,3 and 5 17 2* >7 3X5 C 2 and 3 1 1 2' 3X11 A 2 3' 2' 31 B 2,3,5 and 7 '3 2« 5X13 3*X7 C 2 and 3 43 2' 3X43 A 2,3,5 and? 19 2 XIO 3x7 '9 C 2,3,5 »"d 13 4' 2' XIO ^I 3X13 C 2,3 and 5 79 2» XIO 3* 79 C 2,5 and 7 23 2-'XlO 7X23 A 2,3 and 5 53 2*XlO 3x53 B 2,5 and 1 1 20 2'XIO 1 11 X29 B 2,3 and 5 71 2* XIO 3'X7i B 2,3,5 and 7 61 2' XIO 3X7X61 A 12. The value of L(i + 2) was firfl given by Nicolas Mercator, who deduced it from a property of the cqviilateral hyperbola*. The feries c was firft d em on fl rated by James Gregory f. A Tories fome what lefs general than / was produced by John Keill.in his treatife de Naiura and arithmetica hgar'ithmoriwi : but I think I have fome where feen it attri- buted to Newton. Some of the other formulce I believe are new. PROBLEM II. 13. To exhibit the modulus of af\J}an of logarithm!. This is efTcdled by fubftituting c for w, and i for //, in the equation H. Its value is as. follows : 1 2(7^)+;(;{p{)' + '(:f') 4-^< UEMAUKS, • Logaritlimotechnia. f Exer. Gfom. fii APPENDIX. REMARKS. 14. In our common fyflcm of logarithms, c is equal to 10; which gives the following values of w, and its reciprocal to thirty decimal places. /x=: 0.4342 9 44819 03251 83765 11289 ^^9^7 i =2.30258 50929 94045 68401 69914 54684 15. The modulus of Napier's fyflem is unity: for he fuppofed the logarithm of a number diflering from unity by a very fmall quantity d to be equal to the fum or difference of i and ^: Hence if ^L denote the common, or Brigg's, logarithm, and 'L, Napier's logarithm of the fame number; then ^L = (0.43429 Sec) 'L; and 'L=r (2.30258 &c) ^L PROBLIJVI. III. 1 6. To exhibit the number of a given logarithm. We have feen that d be- ing — 1^ and jj. a finite quantity, that / —\+ -, (5) : we have /i therefore c^ — ^x +-)'', and confequently and if x is negative, f-'^=i— 1 + -A— ^^ + &c -T Hence, by dividing O by "^j 2.V '+7-+Tl5-+-— ->« &C fv " — — o 17. If -v is greater than ^m. the above feriefes converge fo flowly that that they are of no ufe for finding the number correfponding to a gi- ven APPENDIX. Ill given logarithm. Let dierefore m and n be two numbers di^cring little from each other, in being greater than », and I mo. Lctx-=L{^)=hm—Ln=i. Thenc'rr-^ and c—'=± and the equations O and "Y give m=r,{i-\-i + 4^^+Ti:-^+ Sec) - - - - M "='"{'-^-\-T£r^-T:,B+ ^^) - - - - N 2do. Let .v = L (^)^=>L(^) = ;L;«-4L« = :; : then/' = ^ and the e- quation CL gives • I S. More generally, let there be any number « of numbers m'\-m'^ '\m"'^m""s: ^fn'"' which, taken confecutively, differ little from each other: and let Lw'^'— -L;«'^-^'=jl^^l and j2-(«— 2)/'^+lf=ili;=l),"> I'— 1 1 ±i/'=: a'^' (the quantities 1/>|, ^^ — 1|, M, ?i — 1| &c. inclofcd in /inei, ex- preffmg funply fome terms of the feries i, 2, 3, 4, 5 Sic) : we have "" It: jV"'" ■ (— ^H"-.^W"" .^M A' A" , A'" , g^c o m' ' REMARKS. 19. If the logarithms of the firfl: 20000 natural mimbers are given, the two firfl ftcps of the feries «(i+-^+_iL.) of the feries M, or «('~-J- ■t-- V.v ) of the feries N, or the firft ftep « (17:^7) of the feries P, will give the number m or ?; true to about the fourteenth decimal place. r f 20. 1 12 APPENDIX. zc. The fciiefes M and N were firft given by Halley, in the Philofo- phical tranfaclions for the year 1C95. He exiiibited alfo a fcries the (lime •witli r, but under an inelegant form ; probably owing to his hav- ing deduced it from the aclual diviiion of M by N, PROBLEM IV. 21. T'o cxijibk the mimhcr ivbofe logarithm is equal to the modulus. Tliis is effe(5led by tlae fubflitution of (i. for x in the formula ^^. It's value is as follows # or taking the fum of thirty fradlional terms ^'^ = 2.71828 182S4 59045 23536 02S74 71353 II. IL A TABLE OF NTAPIER's LOGARITHMS, ©F ALL THE NATURAL NUMBERS FROM I tO lOI tO TWENTY SEVEN PLACES. Num. I it 17 Logarithms. o.ccooo.ocooo.coooo.oocoo.ocooo.o 0.693 14. 71 805. 5994.5. 3C94I.72:j2 1.'. 3 1 .09861 .22886. 68109. 69 139. 5245 2. 4 4 1 .38629,4361 1. 1 9:^90. 6 1 883. 44642. 4 5 1. 60943. 79124. 34100.37460. 07593. 3 ' •79'75-94'^'92' 28055.00081 .24773.6 1.94591.01490.55313.30510.53527.4 8 2.07944.154.6. 79335.92^2^.16963.6 9 2. 19722.45773. 362 1 9. 382 79. 049C4.S 2. 3C258. 50929. 94045. 68401.79914. 6 II 2.3v739.5272:-9S370-y44o<5-i9435'-S 1 2 2.4!i'490.'''6497. 1'Sooo. 31022. 97054. 8 •3 2-5<^494-93574-'S'53^-7.^6o5..hS74.4 14 2.6 .^^,-.73:96, 15258.61452.25848.0 15 2.7c' : c. 020 II. 02 2 10. 0^1599. 60045. 7 2.7 7: 58.8; 2 22. 397 Si. 237 ',6. 89 2^4. () 2.^332l .33440. 56216.08024.95346.2 i.f'9'^37'' '57^' 961C.4. 6922^.77226.0 2.94443.89791.66440.46000.90274.3 2.90,57^.2^735. f3y90-''&343-S = ^.'5-^ Num. Lo G.VRITHMS. 21 3.C44J^-2+.n7- :34"-S9650-0S979.8 22 3. 09 104. 24533. 583 15. 85347. r; 1757.0 23 3- '354v 42 '59- *9' 49- 69^80. 67528. 3 24 3. 1 7805. 3S3C3. 47945. 61964. 69416,0 25 3.21887.58248. '18200.74920. 15 186. 7 26 27 28 29 3' 32 33 3 + 35 3^ 37 39 ao 3.25809.6:380. 2 1482.04547.01-95.6 3.29583.68660. 04329. 074 I?. 57357. I 3.33220.45101. 75203. 92393. 981 69. S 3. 36729. 58299. 86474. 02718.3272--. 3 3.40119.73816. 62 155. 37541. 32366. J 3.43398.72044.85146 .24592.91643.3 3. 4''^573-59°27. 99726.54708.61606. i 3. 49650. 756 14. 664}^6. 16461 . 29646.42744.87326.8 3. 68SS;. 94541. 139^6. 3028 J. 24557.3 ^» 114 APPENDIX. Num. Logarithms. 4« 3. 7'35"-'(^<567. 04507. 80386. 67633. 7 4? 3. 73 766. 96 1 82. 8 ^368. 3059 1. 7S30 1.0 4 J 3. 76 120. or 156.93562.42347.28425.2 44 3.784iS,> 6339. 18261 . 16289.64078,2 45 3.80666.24897.70319.75739.12498. I ^6 3,82864. 13964. ^909;. 00022. 39849. 5 47 3.^SO'4-76®'7- 10058.58682.09506.7 48 3.87120. 101C9.07H90. 92906,^1 73 7. 2 49 3.89182.02981. 10626.6102 1 .07054. 8 50 3.91202,30054, 28146.05861.87507.9 51 3.93182.56327.24325,77164.47798.6 52 3 -95 '24-37 '85. 8 1427 -35+88. 7 95 '6. 9 53 3.97029.19135.52121.83414.44691.4 54 3.988^8.40465. 64274.38360.29678.3 55 4.00733.31852.32470.91866.27029. t 56 57 58 59 60 61 (>i 63 64 65 Num. Logarithms. 4.02535.16907. 35M9-23335-7349'- ' 4.04305.12678. 34550. 15140.42726.7 4. 06c 44. 30 105. 46419.33660.05041.6 4-07753-74439- 057 ' 9- 45of>' •60503-8 4.09434.456:2. 221C0.684S3.046S8. 1 4.11087.3864T. 7331 1.248-5. 1 3891. 1 4. 127 13. 4^85o. 45091.55 534. 63964.5 4.1431^47263.91532.68789.58432.2 4. 15888.30833. 5c,:67 1,85650. 33927. 3 4. 1 7438. 7 2698. 95 637. 1 1065. 42467. 8 66 4.18965.47420. 26425.54487.44209.4 67 4. 20469.26193, 90966.05967.00720.0 63 4. 2 1 950. 7 705 1 . 76106.69908. ^9988. 6 69 4.23410.65045. 97259.38220.19980.7 70 4.34849.5 242c. 49358.98912.33442.0 71 I 4.26267.98770,41315.42132.94545.3 72 73 74 75 ^6 77 78 79 80 86 87 88 8y 90 9' 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 4.27666.61 190, 1(^055.31 1 04. 2 1 868.4 4.29045.9441 1 . 48391 . p 2909.2 1088.6 4. 30406. 50>)32, 04169.75378.53278.3 4. 3 1 748. b 1135. 363 1 0.44059. 676^9. I 4-33073 -334' 2 -8633 1.07884.349 1 6. 8 4- 343^^ .542 ' 8- 53683 • ^49 ' 6. 72963 . z 4. 3567c. «8 266. 89591.73686.59648,0 •4-3''944. 78524- 67^:2' •494« 7. 29455 -4 4. 3 820:. 66346. 73881 .61226.96878.2 81 4.3944-r-9'546. 72438-76558.09809. 5 82 4.40671.92472.64253. 1 1328.39955.0 83 4. 4"'84-'^6o77. 96597.92347,54722.3 84 4.4308 1.67988. 4^31 3.6 15 ^3.50622. 2 85 4.44265.12564.90316.45485.02939. 5 4-45434-72962- 53507.73289.00746.4 4.46590.81186.54583.71857.85172.7 4 -47733 •'^'8 '44- 78206,47231,36399.4 4. 48863. 63697. 32 1 39. 838? 1. 78 155. 4 4.49980.96703. 30255.066^^0.848 19.3 4.51085,95065, 16850.04115.88401 .9 4.52178.85770.49040.30964. 12170.7 4. 53259.94931. 53255. «.3732. 44095. 6 4.54329,^7822. 70003.89623.81827,9 4.55387.68916.00540. 8 3460. 97S67. 7 4. 56434. 81 914. 67836. 1 3848. 14058.4 4.57471 .09785.03382.822 1 1.67216. 2 4.58496.74786.70571.91962.79376.1 4.595 1 1. 98501. 34589,92685.24340.5 4.60517.01859.88091.36803.59829. I 101 I 4.61512.05168.41259.45088.41982.7 III. TRIGONOMETRICAL THEOREMS. (i) Lemma i. The produ : fin a — fin b : : tang i±.* : tang ^. (5) Lem. 4. The fum of the cotangents of two arcs is to tlicir difTe- rence as tlie fine of the fum" of thofe arcs is to the fine of tliclr difference Cot a -\- cozb: cot a— cot b : : {in{b-{-j) ; fin {6 — a), G g (6) ti6 APPENDIX. (6) Lem. 5. The produdl of the fine of the fum of two arcs and the tangent of half that fum, is to the produdl of the fine of their difference and the tangent of half tliat difference, as the fquare of the fine of half their fum is to the fquare of the fine of half their difference. Sin {a+b) X tang ^ : fin {a—b) x tang ii^ : : fin' '4^ : fin' ^*. (7) "Lem. 6. The produifl of the fine of the fum of two arcs and the tangent of half their difference, is to the producft of the fine of their dif- ference and the tangent of half their fum, as the fquare of the cofme of half their fum is to the fquare of the cofine of half tlieir difference. Sin {a-]-b) X tang i"^ : fin {a—b) x tang "4^ -. : cof ' "4^ : cof ' "7*. (8) Lem. 7. In right angled fpherical triangles the cofine of the hy- pothenufe is to the cotangent of one of the oblique angles as the cotan- gent of the other is to the radius. (9) Lem. 8. In right angled fpherical triangles the cofine of the hy- pothenufe is to the cofine of one of the fides as the cofine of the other is to the radius. (10) Lem. 9. In any fpherical triangle the produdl of the fines of the two fides is to the fquare of the radius as the difference of the ver- fed fines of the bafe and the difference of the two fides is to the verfed fine of the vertical angle, Fig. XiV. Sin ABx fin BC : R': : fin V, AC— fin V, (AB— BC) : fin V, B * (11) Lem. 10. In any fpherical triangle the produ(ft of the fines of the two fides is to the fquare of the radius, as the difference of the ver- fed fines of tlie fum of the two fides and the bafe is to the verfed fine of the fupplement of the vertical angle. Fig. XIV. Sin AB X fin BC : R': : fin V, (AB + BC)— fin V, AC : fin V, fup. B. * Tliis is one of Regiomontanus' propofitionj. APPENDIX. ri7 (12) The natural parts of a triangle are its three fides and its three angles. ( 1 3) The circular parts of a redangular (or quadrantal) fpherical tri- angle are the two namral parts adjoining to the right angle (or qua- drant fide) and the complements of the other tlu^ee. (14) Any one of thefe five being confidered as a middle part, the two next to it are called the adjacent parts, and the other two the op- pofite parts : Thus, in the triangle <^AB (Ing. XV.) rectangular in A, if tlw; complement of the angle d is taken as a middle part, the adjacent parts are the fide d A and tlie complement of the hypothenufc db ; and the oppofite parts the fide, b A and the complement of the angle /-. (15) Of five great circles of the fpherc AB, BC, CD, DE, and EA (Fig. XV.) let the firfi: interfecl the fecond ; the fecond, the third ; the third, the fourth ; the fourth, the fifth; and the fifth, tlie fii-ft; at right angles in the points B, C, D, E and A : there are formed, by tlie inter- fecflions mentioned and by thofe at the refpcclive poles a, b^ c, d and e of thefe great circles, five rectangular triangles dXb^ bDe, eBc, cEa and aCd : and, if thefe poles are joined by the qviadrantal arcs ab^ be, cd, de and ea, there are formed five quadrantal triangles adb, dbe, bee, ecu, and cad. The circular parts in all thefe triangles are the fame : tlie pofttion of thefe equal circular parts with refpe(fl to one another in each of thefe triangles is different : therefore (16) What is true of the circular parts of a redangtdar triangle is true of thofe of a quadrantal ; and what is true of one middle part and its adjacent and oppofite parts is true of the other four middle parts and their adjacent and oppofite parts. (^7) ii8 APPENDIX. ( 1 7) The circular parts of an oblique fpherical triangle are its tlirec fides and xht fupplcmcnts of its three angles. (i8) Any one of thcfe fix being confidered as a middle part, the two next to it may be called the adjacent parts ; the one facing it, the re- mote part ; and the other two, the oppofite parts ; Thus, in the triangle ABC (Fig. XIV.), if the fide AC is taken as a middle part, the adjacent parts are the fupplcments of the angles A and C ; the oppofite parts, the fides AB and BC, and the remote part, the fupplement of the angle B. ( 1 9) Of fix great circles of the fphere let the firft three, AB, BC, and CA, interfedl each other at the poles, B, C and A, of the fecond three, ca^ ab and be : the interfedlions, <:, a and b^ of the latter are the poles of the former : there are formed two triangles ABC and abc in which tlie circular parts are the fame ; the pofition of thefe equal circular parts is different in both : therefore (20) What is true of one middle part and its adjacent, oppofite, and remote parts, is true of any other middle part and its adjacent, oppofite, and remote parts. (21) If an arc h^Yid pafs through the vertices of thefe two triangles, it will be perpendicular to their bafes CDA and cda^ and the fegments at the bafc of the owz triangle will be the complements of the fegments at the vertical angle of the other: that is, CD = 90° — dha^ AD = 90° — dbc, f^=9o°— ABD, ^^/=9o°— DBC. (22) If the radius of the fphere is fuppofcd infinite, the fines and tan- gents of the fides of a triangle defcribed on its furface, become the fides themfelves of a plane triangle. Conf cquently all the formulae of fpheri- cal trigonometry, where the fines and tangents only of the fides enter, are applicable to plane trigonometry. Thofe, however, in which any fundions .APPENDIX. 119 fundllons of all the three angles and only one fine or tangent of ous fide enter, mufl be excepted. (23) Of the circular parts we fhall denote the middle one by M, the adjacent ones by A and ^, and the oppofite ones by O and 0. If the tri- angle is oblique, the remote part we fliall call m, and the fcgments at a fide or angle (21)5 and s. (24) Theorem i. Of the circular parts (13) of a rectangular (or quad- rantal) fpherical triangle, the produdl of the radius and the fine of the middle part, the produ<5l of the tangents of the adjacent parts and the product of the cofines of the oppofite parts, are equal. Demonflration. In the right angled fpherical triangle d\b (Fig. XV.) we have cof bd : cot. Abd : : cot Adb : R (8), and cof bd : cof Ai : : coCAd: R (9) ; therefore R X cof bd=cotAbdx cot Adb = cofAbxcorAd; there- fore (16) R X fin M = tang A x tang a z= cof O X cof 0. {1^) Corollary i. In any fpherical triangle, the fines of the fides arc proportional to the fines of the oppofite angles. For, in the right angled triangles ADB and CDB (Fig. XIII.), Rxfm BD = fm ABxfm A, and R X fin BD =fin EC X fin C ; therefore fin AB : fin BG : : fin C : fm A (26) Cor. 2. In any fpherical triangle, the fines of the fegments of one of its fides (produced if neceflary) are proportional to the cotangents of the angles at the extremities of that fide. For, in the right angled triangles ADB and CDB, Rx fin AD = cot Ax tang BD and R x fin DC = cot Cx tang BD y therefore fin AD : fm DC : ; cot A : cot G (27) Cor. 3. In any fpherical triangle, the cofines of any two fides are proportional to the cofines of the fegments of the third fide. For, in the right angled triangles ADB and CDB, Rx cof AB=:cof ADxcof H h • DB, 120 APPENDIX. DB, and Rx cof BC=:cof CDx cof DB ; therefore cof AB : cof BC : : cof AD: cof DC (28) Remark i. This theorem ferves for the folutionof all pofliblc cafes of reclanglar or quadrantal fpherical triangles, and for the folutiou of all poffible cafes of oblique fpherical triangles (by means of the arc drawn from one of its angles perpendicular on the oppofite fide) ; ex- cepting when the three angles, or the three iides only, are the data. (29) Rem. 2. This theorem,, by confining the middle part to the two fides, (22) ferves alfo for the folution of all pofliblc cafes of redlangular plane triangles, and for the folution of all poflible cafes of oblique angled plane triangles (by means of the perpendicular drawn from an angle to to the oppofite fide) ; excepting when the three fides only are the data. (30) Rem. 3. Were the complements of the two parts adjoining to the right angle or quadrant fide and the other three natural parts taken as the circular parts, the theorem would be, R X cof M =z cot A X cot a — fin O X fm 0. But the other is preferable, becaufe it is more eafily remembered. The fecond letter of the word tangent is the fame with the firft of adjacent. It is the fame of the words cofine and oppofite. If this is attended to, it is hardly poffible to forget the enunciation of the theorem. (31) Theorem 2. Of the circular parts (17) of an oblique fpherical triangle, the fquare of the fine of half the middle part, is to the fquare of the radius ; as the producl of the fines of half die fum and half the difference of the fum of the adjacent parts and the remote part, is to the produ^). and tang (:y:i) : tang (^) : : fm (A+«) : fm {A—.i), (38); and tang 2±1 : tang ^^-=2 : : tang (dp) -. tang (i^),(4o) it follows, that tang' (H:'). tang' (^) :: fm {A-{-a) x tang ±tl : fin.(A— ^)x tang (■'=:); therefore (6) ' _ Tang i M ; tang (2=?) : ; fin (iif) : fin (:i=;). (+3) I 1 124 APPENDIX. (4'^) Theorem 9. Of the circular parts of an oblique fpherical triangle, The tangents of half the middle part and half the fum of the oppofite parts are proportional to the cofmcs of half the fum and half the dif- ference of the adjacent parts. Dem. For fmce tang (^) X tang {'^) = tang (2±f ) x tang [2=2], (34) ; and tang (^) : tang (^) :: fm (A-f^) : fm (A — a), (38); and tang 9=1 : tang 9±1 -, -. tang ±^ : tang ^' (40) ; it follows, that tang * 1+/- tang* ^: :fin (A+«) tang ^^:fm (A— ^) tang (^) : therefore (7) Tang iM : tang 2±1 -.-.cof^tl :.cof±^. (44) Rem. 9. From thefe two theorems it is evident, that, being gi- ven two angles and the inclvided fide, or two fides and the included angles of any fpherical triangle, the other two fides, or the other two angles may be found ; and being given two angles and the included fide of any plane triangle, the other two fides may be found by iwo analogies only. From tliefe proportions are deduced the following TRIGONOMETRICAL FO RMULiE. (45) In any fpherical triangle ABC, Fig. XIV. we have Sin AB X fin BC : R': : fin ^c+/ib—bc x fin ac—ab—hc -. fm' jB (32) Sin AB X fin BC : R* :: fin yiB+jiC+ACxfin ab+bc—ac -. cof '^6,(3 1 ) Sin ab+bc+jc X fm yJ/i+nc—/!C : R' : ; fm ac+ab—bc x fin jc—AB—Bc : tang' I B {2)i) '■*' Sin Ax fin C : R"' : : — cof ^+ c+ ^ x cof ^1+ c— B : fin ' ^ AC Sin Ax fin C ; R'" : : cof £+£^x cof ^-^ ; cof I AC a a coi APPENDIX. i.. Cof£+^X cof£-^^ : R' : : — cof £+£+5 x cof w+£_£ ; tangVf AC Tang .;, AC : tang ^C+7iA . . ^^ng b c—ba . j-^ng e n— da * * a Sin (A+C) : fin (A— C) : : tang I AC : tang en— da i Cot i B : tang ^+^ : : tang jtz£j tang cdb-dba Sin (BC+BA) : fin (BC— BA) : : cot ^ B : tang c.bd-dba Tang J^c+BA , tai^g ^g-^ // ; ; tang ^+c : tang ^-^ Sin ^+c . fin ^-C ; : tang I AC : tang ^C-ba €of ^+^ : cof ^-C : : tang \ AC : tang ^g+^-^ Z Z 1 Sin I£±^A: fin -^^-^-^ : : cot I B : tang ^-^ Cof BC+B/i . cof ^c-z?/r . : cot i B : tang ^+c 2 1 2 (46) In any plane triangle ABC, Fig. XVI. we have (22) AB X BC : R' : : ( ac+ab-Bc ) X { AC-^n—Bc ) ; {n\ \ B 2 i AB X BC : R' : : { AoTJuJ+Ac ) x {ab+bc—ac) : coP 4 B 2 • 1 (7?A+5C+.YC) X [ab+Tc—AC) : R* : : (/^C+^^^^^t;) x [AC—AB^^FC) : tang' | B AC : BC+BA : : BC— BA : CD— Dx\ Sin (A+C) : fin (A— C) : : AC : CD— DA BC+BA : BC— BA : : tang d±L : tang .^t±. : : cot ^ B : tang jtS. : : cot ^- B : tang CDB-DBA 2 Sin ^+C , fin ^~C : : AC : BC— BA 2 2 C^f j1±£. : coi±z£. : : AC : BC+BA . » a rv. J \ l tktuama IV. THE HYPERBOLA AS CONNECTED WITH THE LOGARITHMS. 1. While a rtralght line PM (Fig. XVII.) moves parallel to itfelf along the indefinite ftraight line CPD with a velocity always proportional to the diflance of its extremity P from a fixed point C, let its other extremity M approach to or recede from P, lb that PM may defcribc equal fpaces in equal times : The point P will defcribe a part PP' or ?p' of the Itraight line CD, while the point M defcribes a correfponding part MM' or Mm of the curve ffz'SM'. 2. If the motion is luppofed to have begun at P, the area PM M'P' or PM t/i'p' is the logaritlim of the abfcifs CP' or Cp\ 3. In order that equal fpaces may be defcribed in equal times, it is evident that the greater or fmaller the abfcifs CP' or Cp' becomes with regard to CP, the fmaller or greater mud the ordinate P'M' or p'm' be- come with regard to PM ; Therefore CP' : CP : : PM : P'M', or Cp' : CP : : PM :p'm' ; Therefore the producfl of any abfcifs by the corrcfpondent ordinate is a conflant quantity : Therefore 4. The curve m'SM' is a hyperbola having CD for one of its affymp- totcs, and C;, parallel to the ordinatcs, for the other. Kk S' I ZO APPENDIX. 5. From tills manner of conceiving the generation of the hyperbola might be deduced the properties of that cm-ve and of the logarithms. That CD and Ct, for inflancc, touch tlic curve at an inilnlte dlilance from C appears from this : When the abfclfs is infinite, the ordinate miift be zero, and vv'heii the abfclfs is zero, the ordinate mull be infi- nite, in order tiiat their producl may equal the finite quantity PM X CP : And that the logarithm of CP is zero appears from this ; PM is length vfithout breadth and therefore no fpace. 6. Let CP = «, PM=//., PP'=.v and VM'zzy; we have (3);' = —, or, developing the fraclion -' - in the manner firft taught by Nicolas Mer- cator-'*, ' a a^ a-' 7. It is evident that the fpace PMMT' is equal to the fum of all the ordinates ■/ -\-y" -\-y" -{- ^c. on the abfclfs x. If the abfclfs is fup- pofed to be divided into an iniinltc number of infinitely fmall and equal parts, the abfciflk correfponding to the ordinates j'',j",j'"', Sec. may be called I, 2, 3, Sec: therefore (6) 3/"z.,..(i-^+^-2^+&c) therefore •-■' i' Rcc 11 -7-"~""' ■^■— C'f^/ : 33 ut, if the equal tlnies are infinitely fmall, the arcs M^m, and M'/y/ are ftraight linesand the right angled triangles CPM and Mf^w., fimilar ; con- feqnently CP : PjNI : : M^ or Pr : v^jthercfore CF : PM : : P'x' : vu. or //. 6. To ^r^7Zf a tangent to any point AI' of the Logarithmic. Upon the or- dinate P'M' take P'L'r=PM ; join the points C and L' and draw parral- Icl to CL' the ftraight line MV meeting the axis in the point r' ; t'M' touches the curve in the point M' : For fince (5) CP' : PM or P'L' : : P',' or M'/ : v'm,', the triangles CP'L' and M'/^«.' are fimilar j therefore M'^/ is parrallel toCL' ; therefore &.c : Hence, 7. The ordinates to the afTymptote, MQ^ MCV, &c. have for their lo- garithms its abfcilFae CQ^ CQ^: and 8. The fubtangents CQ^ C'Q^, 8cc. upon the alTymptote are all equal to the logarithmic modulus PM. 9. The fubtangent T'P' upon the axis is to the ordinate P'M' as the abfcifs CP' is to the modulus PxM ; For the triangles T'P'M' and C'P'M' are fimilar : Hence, I o. The fubtangents upon the axis are to each other as the produ(fls of the abfcifls and ordinates. 1 1. The fubnormal P'N' upon the axis is to the ordinate as the loga- rithmic modulus to the abfcifs : For the triangles CP'L' and M'P'N' are fimilar: Hence, 1 2. The fubnormals xipon the axis are to each other as the quotients of the ordinates and abfciflx. »3 APPENDIX. 133 1 3 The fabtangent is to the fubnormal as the fquare of the abfcifs to the fqirarc of jthe logarithmic modulus. 14. Let V\l = i/., CP =:s and P'M'=:;': and let z', z\z\ . . . s" be any number of abfcifHr in geometrical progreflion ; S',S^\S"\. . . S ", the cor- refpondent fubtangent-s, and .x{^^ — f/.x (i — x-f-.v* — x'-j-&:c) and therefore jK = ^.(x — :- + li— &cc)r=Log. (i+x). 16. Let the area of any portion S'M'P' of tlie curve=A: wc have • • • • • • A = sv; therefore A =y ay zrs)'—3^'s: but _y = '^' (5)>or (15); therefore Jj'z=/i/.z=:iy.~; therefore A = ~v — m.= -|-C: but when Azzo, then z=m and ^ = 6; therefore ozz — f^m-{^C ; therefore Czzfjum and A = = {y — h)-|^ /AW, that is 1 7. The area of any portion of the logarithmic is equal to the rec- tangle under the abfcifs and the difference of the ordinate and the lo- garithmiy »34 APPEND X. garithmic modulus, togctlier with the rectangle under the moduli ; Hence 1 8. The reclangle CL, under the moduli, is equal to tlie area SMP contained by the logarithmic modulus PM, the portion of the axis MS, and tlie arc SM ; or to the area SmsC contained by the numeric mo- dulus SC, the affymptote C/, and tlxe infinite branch mS of the curve. B I N I S. QliiiWjas =r;^-K2eKig2J= sasBP^ LIST OF BOOKS, QJJOTED OR CONSULTED, to ELUCIDATE THE LIFE AND WRITINGS, JOHN NAPIER OF M E R C li I S T O N. ARCIIIMEDIS Syrucafani Arenarius, &c. Eulocii Afcalonitw in hanc cotn- nient. cum verfione et notis Joh. Wallis. Diftionaire Hiftorique et Critique par M. Pierre Bayle. A Rotterdam, 1720. Folio paflim. Balcarres' Memoirs. Bernoulli Ars conje£landi et tra£latus de fe- riebus infinitis. B.itilea;, 1713. 4to. Opera Omnia. Laufannjc ct Genevre. 1742. Biographia Britannica. Bofcovich de Cycloide ct Logiftica. Arithmetica Logarithmica five logaritlimo- rum cliitiades triginta ; pro num':ris natii- rali ferle creftcntibus ab unitate ad 20.000 rt a 90.000 ad 100.000 : quorum ope mul- ta perliciuntur arithmetica problemata et geoinctrica. Hos numeros primus invcnit clariflimjis vir Johannes Neperus Baro Mcrchiftonii : cos aiitem ex cjuldem fen- tentii mutavat, cor^imquc ortum et ufum illuftravit Henricus Driggius, in cclcberri- ma Academia Oxonlcnli Gcometriae Pro- feflor Savilianus. Deus nobis ufuram vi- tx dedit et ingenii, tanquam pecuniie nul- la prxftituta die. Londini 1624, Polio. Boethius de Arithmetica. Caufaboni Epiftolse. Chriftophori Clavii Bambergenfis, c Soc. Jc- fu, Opera Mathematica. Moguntiae 161 1. Polio. . de Aftrolabio. Vol. III. Chambers' Diflionary, 2 vols Folio. Craufurd's Peer,«ge of Scotland. lives of the officers of State. Crugerus Pref. in Praxin Trig. Nouveau Diet. Hift. etCrit. pour fervir de fup- plement au Dift. de M. Bayle, par Jaques George dc ChaulPepie. Amllerdam 1756^ Folio paflini. Douglas's Peerage of Scotland. Duteus inquiry. Exercitationcs Gcomctricx. Au<5l. Jacob. Gregory. 1 668. Hervarti ah Hohenburgh opera. 1610. Matlvcmatical Tables containingCommon, Hy- perbolic and Logiaic logarithms; alfo lines, Tangent J L I F BOOKS. tangents, fecants and verfed fines, both na- tural and logarithmic, &c. to which is pre- lixed a large and original hiltory oi' the dil- {overics andwritingi relating to tliofc fub- jffts f7'm. I . Hiir/fursfftliri^H/>d Fciir/iursrf-j'Hni Fdir/h/rx rfS^ReJ Fourfaasifj,*Iied Feuty'a/rs r/x'Tirr/ 1 y'r^ /y 'A A\ A, /p A A^ A A" y A /o A y A /o A A A e I Foinrjaees c/y.^Brd S 9 / y. // A A A Ai / AS A' 'A A Ae A A >\ A Ai A A A A % A A\ % A A s rt ^1 A / ..9 A A / "l 1 Ao As A A A A'e y ^ Af>, Aa y A A(^'y* A^'/ AA, yA Ay^AA. AA A m Af A^ y. y Ar 'A A A e 9 fi s- Fell r/iuts p/'s!^Hi'(l Fhiir^as r/'jURfff 1 // Ai d A Ai A A-''. A A-f y Ai A A^ A-r A /s A-r y A A^ y V A A y Y A y y A lA A, '■> A Ay& 8/ A L i ■It / i / A^ 'A A-r A' A yc A ,'V y. 'A 'v /« '/f fi A A A A A A\ A t A *S A A A ^t ^/ ^f A A If /. t Ffi/i/furs cfic*tirt/ A~Z tA Y'' A / /elAs y A A^A* y A A /^ 'A A 'Ai ^-r 'A AA }' ^ yM, h A A, A '/, 'A *A A V FA / 'X.ii. /__r . i s. I A A\,Ay3 A A yyA'' A Ay A A Ai ,, , ^ / /4 ^•\ ■ A • ,' ■' s A 7 ILA 'A ■ ^. A'A . ^'. i 'Jv m , 1 -r e ^ At /i A /t /* A A As A^ A, y A /^ y hM A * * 1 t H e i 1 'A i : ■t s 1 '' li 6 7 8 IS \J o/. A^A ^ ot ■^cs *l. a X5 ' te i6 ^^y 5 ,^: / t 3 >/ S 6 7 s ^ ' «i jLL ''AaX. 'A s \A^*^* raUHk^l K r. M.nfc«v im rkiini Engraved for the Life of JNafier Platen ^%ffXm. "^ ()<--i .1 >• o o o o o Wx^ ' ) (I o fcr« >J^y LX u o o ]0> O tv- >.^x. .o ~^ 4 1' > ■ ♦ 1 s o + f?) (Jl C4 1 + + t* /.I /.. ' i (fl (i , , t U ) 1 •:nl < VullJkxl W R Msriron iCSoD I*iR-ru Eii.oraved iorthc l.ilr ofNAPiij: Plate ni. ,, /rn" ft- X (. -T— 1 1 1 1 I I N' X' K" -1-U 1 "7^ T K 'jt,.Xl. a T i; U r/ ICjaei'avccl for theXafe o£ Natieb rktcn-: ^ B iiHilWl-i K Morilon ■>. >.<> Irnrl I5ii^a\-cd£)r1hc lifi'of X.\pier Plate V IV).Uk.«l b. HkUnC V.«» Hnmi ' I University of Calltomia SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 405 Hilgard Avenue. Los Angeles, CA 90024-1388 Return this material to the library from which It was borrowed. "ft Form 8) m 3 1158 00315 3573 •-: >»• . •». •.-■;*