KA ll3 B 4 ^int, t^D^ rilK I'OKrKV ()!■ IX'CRKTIUS PUBLISHED FOR THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS 12 Lime Grove, Oxford Road, Manchester LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO. London : 39 Paternoster Row- New York: 443-449 Fourth Avenue and Thirtieth Strbht Bombay : 8 Hornby Road Calcutta: 6 Old Court House Street Madras: 167 Mount Road BERNARD QUARITCH II Grafton Street, New Bond Street, London, W. THE POETRY OF LUCRETIUS A LECTUKH DKI.U KKH) AT THK JOHN RVLANDS l.lUkAKY ON THK UTH IKHRUARY. 191- C. H. HERFORD, M.A., Lin.D. ttSOR 0» BNOLISli Lrr««ATtlir AND LAXUt'AOl: IS lilt VICT L'NIVCaairV 0» MANCHCtTtll Rtprinttd from " Tht Ruttttin of tht John Kylands Library" Vol. 4. So. 2, Sef>l.. 1 91 7-ytfi»., if>lti MANCHESTEK : THK UNIVERSITY TRESS. 1; LIME GROVE, OXFORD ROAU. LONGMANS. GREEN AND CO., jo PATERNOSTER ROW. LONDON, E.C., NEW YORK. BOMBAY. CALCUTTA. AND MADRAS. BERNARD QUARITCH. 11 GRAFTON STREET, LONDON, W. MCMXVIM iiJzL'^^J^ PA I HL POEIKY Ul- LUCRETIUS. By C H. HERFOKD. MA, Li i i U . Professor ok English LirfcRAiuRK and Lancuagc in ihh Victoria University oi Manchester. DcdKAlcd ID llir Kt. Hon. Viscount Morley. O.M. Chaiuellor of the ('nnwrsity of MamlusUi. " LiHrdiut itudi alooe in (he cootrovmial lorce and enetgy with %>. lh<- ihoughl ihal ihr die oi • nun i< no more lK a lime when iho title ol this pa|K.-i would havr Ikth rrceivcd as a paradox if not as a contradiction in terms. Lcssing, as is well known, declared roundly that Lucretius was " a versifier, not a poet."' and Leasing was one of the »^ greatest of European critics. It is easy, indeed, to sec the reason of Leuing's trenchant condemnation. It reflects his implicit acceptance of Aristotle's I'oilu v, which he said was for him as absolutely valid as Euclid, and therefore of Anstotlc's dtKtnnc that poetry is imita- tion of human action. Lcssing s insistence on this doctrine was extraordinarily salutary in his day, and definitely lowered the status uf the dubiou^i kinds known as descriptive, allegoncal. satirical, and didactic [xjetry. m a century tix) much given to them all. That phrase of his about the imitation of human action marked out a coiTccl, well-defined, and vife channel for the stream of poetry to pur- sue, and some of the slender poetic rills of his generation improved their chance of survival by falling into it and Rowing between its banks. But Lesstng did not reckon with the power of poetic gcniu> to force its own way to the sea through no matter how tangled and An cJAboration of the Lecture delivered in the John l<>laDd< Library on 14 February, 1917. nsfioss 6 THK JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY tortuous a river-bed, -nay, to capture from the very obstructions it over- comes new splendours of foam and rainbow unknown perhaps to the well-regulated stream. In plain language, he did not reckon with the fact that a prima facie inferior form, such as satire or didactic, may not only have its inferiority outweighed by compensating beauties, but may actually elicit and provoke beauties not otherwise to be had, and thus become not an obstacle, but an instrument of poetry. Nor did he foresee that such a recovery of poetic genius, such an effacement of the old boundaries, such a withdrawal of the old taboos, was to come with the following century, nay, was actually impending when he wrote. Goethe, who read the Laokoon entranced, as a young student at Leipzig, honoured its teaching very much on this side of idolatry when he came to maturity. As a devoted investigator of Nature, who divined the inner continuity of the flower and the leaf with the same penetrating intuition which read the continuity of a man, or of a his- toric city, in all the phases of their growth, Goethe was not likely to confine poetry within the bounds either of humanity or of the drums and tramplings, the violence, passion, and sudden death, for which human action in poetic criticism has too commonly stood. He him- self wrote a poem of noble beauty on the " Metamorphosis of Plants" (1 797) — a poem which suffices to show that it is possible to be poeti- cally right while merely unfolding the inner truth of things in perfectly adequate speech.' We cannot wonder, then, that Lucretius and the poem " On the Nature of Things" excited in the greatest of German poets the liveliest interest and admiration. On the score of subject alone he eagerly welcomed the great example of Lucretius. But he saw that Lucretius had supreme gifts as a poet, which would have given distinction to whatever he wiote, and which, far from being balked by the subject of his choice, found in it peculiarly large scope and play. " What sets our Lucretius so high," he wrote (1821) to his friend v. Knebel, author of the first German translation. " what sets him so high and assures him eternal renown, is a lofty faculty of sensuous intuition, which enables him to describe with power ; in ' Goethe probably never heard of a less fortunate adventure in that kind by his English contemporary Dr. Erasmus Darwin, the Ln'cs of llic P/aiit's, which had then been famous m England for ten years; a poem which suffices to show that it is possible to exploit in the description of natural processes ail the figures and personifications of poetry, and yet to go egregiousl}' wrong. THE POETRY OF LUCRETIUS 7 addition, hr dis|)Ov>, ol a fxjwrrful imagination, which enable* him to pursue what he ha'* seen beyond the reach o( sense into the invisible depths of Nature and her most mysterious reccMc*." ' But while Goethe thus led the way in endorsing without reserve the Lucretian conception of what the field of poetry might legitimately include, he contributed to the dixcus-sion nothing, m far as I know, so illu- minating or so profound as the great saying of Wordsworth : " poetry is the impassioned expression which is in the countenance of all sci- ence ". For Wordsworth here sweeps peremptorily away the bound- ary marks set up, for better or worse, by ancient criticism he knows nothing of a poetry purely of man or purely of action : he finds the Hifffrentici of poetry not in any particular choice of subject out of the field of real things, but in the iwfa.^' of life, everywhere pulsing through Nature, and perpetually reborn " in man and beast and earth and air and sea," cries to the poet in every monufnt of his experience with a voice which will not be put by, and f the symbols from soul-life by which he seeks to convey his sense of ^ it. if they often read human personality too definitely into the play of that elusive mystery, yet capture something in it which escapes the reasoned formulas of science, and justify the claim of poetic experience to be the source of an outlook upon the world, of a vision of life, with which, no less than with those reached through philosophy and religion, civilization has to reckon. rhe poetic consciousness of soul has thus left a deep impress upon the medium of ideas through which we currently regard both Nature and Man. Il has imbued with a nrher significance and a livelier appeal those analogies in Nature of which 1 s{X)kc ; turning the sublime but bare conceptions of continuity and substance into Wordsworth's soitulhitii; iHort- litff^lx mt^rfustd, or Shelley's /.<».<• . . . through the tvfh of /u-ini^ hliuiHy ;i-(Kr turning the abstraction of infinity into limitle<(s aspiration, or into that " infinite passion " which Brown- ing felt across " the pain of finite hearts that veam '". 10 THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY On the other hand, in its interpretation of Man, the poetic soul- consciousness, so extraordinarily intense on the emotional and imagina- tive side, has lifted these aspects of soul into prominence ; illuminating and sustaining everywhere the impassioned insight which carries men outside and beyond themselves, in heroism, m prophecy, in creation, in love ; which makes the past alive for them, and the future urgent ; which lifts them to a vision of good and evil beyond that of moral codes ; to the perception that danger is the true safety, and death, as Rupert Brooke said, " safest of all " ; which in a word gives wing and scope and power to that in man which endures, as the stream endures though its water is ever gliding on, and makes us " feel that we are greater than we know ". I have tried to sketch out some of the ways in which a scientific poetry is possible without disparagement to either element in the de- scription- Let me now proceed to apply some of these ideas to the great poet of science who is our immediate subject. II. In this assembly it is unnecessary to recall the little that is told, on dubious authority, of the life which began a little less than a hundred years before the Christian era, and ended when he was not much over forty, when Virgil was a very young man. All that is told of his life is the story that he went mad after receiving a love- philtre, composed the books of his great poem " On the Nature of Things " in his lucid intervals, and finally died by his own hand. It is this tradition which Tennyson with great art has worked up into his noble poem. We need not here discuss the truth either of the tradition of madness or of that of suicide. What is certain is that no poem in the world bears a more powerful impress of coherent and continuous thought. While the poets of his own time and of the next generation, though deeply interested in his poetry and in his ideas, know nothing of the tragic story which first emerges in a testi- mony four centuries later. Lucretius called his poem by the bald title " Of the Nature of Things". But no single term or phrase can describe the aims which, distinct but continually playing into and through one another, compose the intense animating purpose of the book. We may say that it is at once a scientific treatise, a gospel of salvation, and an epic of IHL mt TRY OK LUCKt nUS 1 1 nature and man ; yd wr are raicly conscious of any one o( lh«e aims lo the exclusion of tfie rent. In none of these three aim* wa* Lucretius wholly original. In each ot them he had a great precursoi among lh»- >>[>cculative thinkers and poet^ of Greece. H»s Mucncc roughly s()eaking v/d» the creation of Deinocntu-> ; hi!> no^n:\ of salvation wa* the work <>f tpicurus ; and the greatest example of a poem on the nature of things, before his. had been given by fclm|>c- doclcs, the poet-philosopher of Agrigentum whom Matthew Arnold made the mouthpiece of his grave and lofty hymn of nmeteenth- century peiisimism. In his own country his only prcdecesMX in any sense was blnnius, the old national poet who had first cast the hexa- meter in the stubborn mould of Latin s(>ccch. to whom he pays char- acteristically generous homage. The atomic system of Democritus, which explained all things in the universe as combinations of different kinds of material particles, was a magnificent contribution to physical science, and thr fertility of its essential idea is still unexhausted. It touched the problems of mind and lite, of ethics and art, only indirectly, in sd far as it resolved mind and all its activities into functions of matter and motion. Epicurus, on the other hand, a saintly recluse, bent only upon showing the way to a life of »<-rene and cheerful virtue, took over '>he doctrine of the great physicist of Abdrra, without any touch of dispassionate speculative interest, as that which promised most effectual relief from disturbing interests and cares, and especially from the dis- turbance generated by fear of the gods and of a life after death. He might have gone to the great Athenian idealists of the fourth century, the immortal masters not only of those who know, but of those who think and labour and create, whether in science or in poetry or in citizen.ship. But his aim was precisely to liberate from these distract- ing energies, and allure a weary generation h-om the forum an'l the workshop, evrn the studio of letters or of art, and the temple* of the god>, into the choice seclusion of his garden the garden of a soul at |)cace, fragrant vsith innocent and beautiful things. VlTiat Epicurus added of his own to Democntus" theor>- was an accom- modation not to truth but to convenience ; and the measure of his scientific ardour is given by his ea.sy toleration of conflicting explana- tions of the same phenomenon, provided they di»{)ense with the inter- vention ol the gods. While the measure of his attachment to poe