lifornia .onal lity BV 1485 F74c FoFBusTT- boys Southern Branch of the University of California Los Angeles Form L 1 U65 This book is DUE on the last date stamped below 132* MAR 1 9 19 ^ 1928 ,DEC4 1933 t APR 1 5 193^ 1936 NOV 8 I9J| APR 2 7 198T Ml AY 1 Form L-'J-5tn-12,'23 CHURCH WORK WITH BOYS "There are some ways in which we can play on an instrument and some ways in which we can not. Instead of blaming the instrument, we had better learn the stops." W. H. P. FAUNCE. CHURCH WORK WITH BOYS BY WILLIAM BYRON FORBUSH AUTHOR OF "THE BOY PROBLEM" THE PILGRIM PRESS BOSTON NEW YORK CHICAGO Copyright, 1910 BY LUTHER H. CARY THE . PI.IMPTOlt . PRESS [w .D -o] HOBWOOD . MASS . U . 8 A PREFACE The Boy Problem was a study of boyhood in general, with some special application to the various forms of social work with boys, and, in the last edition, some reference to the boy in the home. This smaller book deals solely with one special but important part of such social work, that done for boys in our churches. It exalts the signifi- cance of it, states its principles, and goes into details as to methods, books, and organizations for the religious education of boys in the Church. The book is designed for the reading of Church workers and for study in classes by those who are preparing to be of service to the men of tomorrow. For the latter especially, each chapter concludes with hints for first-hand study, outlines for report, and suggestions for further reading. WILLIAM BYRON FORBUSH. The North Woodward Avenue Congregational Church, Detroit. CONTENTS PAGE I. WHAT CHURCH WORK WITH BOYS MEANS . i II. THE WAY OF GOD WITH A BOY . . 8 III. THE PRINCIPLES OF CHURCH WORK WITH BOYS 19 IV. THE WORK OF MEN FOR BOYS . . 28 V. How TO TEACH A BOYS' SUNDAY- SCHOOL CLASS 47 VI. How TO CONDUCT A CHURCH BOYS' CLUB 61 VII. BOYS AND THE KlNGDOM .... 83 BIBLIOGRAPHY 95 INDEX 103 vn Church Work with Boys WHAT UilkCH WORK WITH BOYS MEANS There may be a few pastors and church members who still think that social work with boys is either something of a fad or at least an elective. To such it seems necessary to explain that it is the absolute essential if boys are to be brought into the Kingdom. Social work with boys in the church does not necessarily imply gymnasia or apparatus or elaborate kinds of boys' clubs, such as can be conducted only in churches of wealth or by people of exceptional ability and leisure. Social work with boys is simply a modern expres- N 'sion of incarnation. ^ What is meant is .this: The study of childhood *} teaches us that boys are brought into the Christian --life, not by the formal teaching of truth in sermon \ and Sunday-school class, but by the contagion * of Christian character in actual operation. "Character is caught, not taught." Just as our Master became the incarnation of the life of God in our human life, so the leader of boys must become the incarnation of the life of the Master in their lives. Church work with boys gives the opportunity for a man to live the Christlike life in companionship with boys. One man will do that effectively just by his example in the com- [i] CHURCH WORK WITH BOYS munity. Another will thus influence boys by occasional contact with them in the Sunday-school class or at his home, but as such occasions are too fortuitous and infrequent for the certainty of real influence, the devoted leader of boys will covet regular social opportunities for influence. A few men have been able by personal work, which in its finest meaning is tactful personal interest and evangelism, to bring boys one by one into vital relations with God and with manly character. Suitable opportunities for such approach are difficult to secure, and the avenue of such intimacy is a difficult one to travel. Most people who say they depend upon this method are likely to be neglectful in their exercise of it. The reserved soul of a boy is not to be burglar- ized, and most wise leaders feel that an acquaint- ance formed through play or some other wholesome interest of youth is the best way of approach to affairs of the spirit. The interesting recent studies that have been made of "the gang" 1 show that instinctive social organization, especially for outdoor play, but also for wintertime sport indoors, is almost universal among boys. The leader who takes advantage of this instinct is not calling together boys out of their homes who would otherwise be there; he is simply either summoning a ready-made "gang," or he is arrang- ing a new one from members of several others. It has been questioned whether any man-made "gang" is as strong as a boy-made one. The writ- er's experience is that sometimes a "gang" may be adopted by a worker outright, or that, in time, a worker may lead in creating a "gang" which is 1 Summarized in The Boy Problem. [2] WHAT CHURCH WORK WITH BOYS MEANS fully as loyal and persistent as any of those in the neighborhood. To do either of these things, common sense would indicate that the leader should try to follow the line of least resistance in the choice of members, the plan of organizing, and the matter of self-government. It is his own tact and his superior resource which make him an acceptable member of the group, i> What then, essentially, is the boys' club for? It is the opportunity actually to live out a certain portion of the normal life together. It is a real gymnasium or laboratory of life. In the Sunday- school class the teacher preaches fairness, gener- osity, truth, and virtue; in the club he tries, in the real situations of the club life, to be fair, gener- ous, true, and virtuous with them, and this without preaching. The home and the school are of course the chief laboratories of life, but the boy comes so enthusiastically to his club that its effects are of unparalleled intensity. The home and the school chiefly develop individualism, the club uses the cumulative influence of the group. There, chiefly, the boy learns the brotherhood of man. The club, though only occasionally in session, calls out a new moral problem every moment when it meets. In its uses of enthusiasm, cooperation, and eager activity it affords us the most practical and effective exercise of will possi- ble in any human conjunct relation. It becomes, in President G. Stanley Hall's fine phrase, "gen- tlemen practising noblesse oblige." Beyond this general influence there are a number of special ones which can only be barely named in passing. The supervised club gives safe expres- sion for the "gang" instinct, which at its worst is CHURCH WORK WITH BOYS the mob-spirit, and at its best is the power of friendship-making. This segregation of boys in the club tends to prolong boyhood, prevent pre- cocity, and postpone sex-functioning, thus retain- ing wholesome boyishness as long as possible. It offers an opportunity for the expression and satisfaction of certain instincts which are best expressed during boyhood. The boy who has his fill of military drill, for example, is less likely to want to be a soldier later. The boy who belongs to some supervised club with a mystery to it is less likely to become a "lodge fiend." It often reveals vocational aptitudes and is in other ways a help to a boy in self-discovery and self- realization. The study of childhood has also of late laid the greatest emphasis upon the importance of the social instinct even in the religious decision of youth. So strong in every department of immature life is the influence of companions that it seems no exaggeration to say that boys are candidates for individuality rather than complete individuals, and that, to a degree greater than has been realized, they live the conjunct life. If this be indeed a law of the soul during the adoles- cent years, then the social approach is not only the most direct and wholesome, but it is the only complete approach, and it may be questioned whether a boy who enters into the religious life entirely alone really gets all his birthright. These psychological explanations are placed in the forefront so that in the discussions of detailed methods that follow the reader may remember that methods are suggested not for their own sake, but for the purpose of utilizing our best [4] WHAT CHURCH WORK WITH BOYS MEANS knowledge of child nature in the most skillful Christian craftsmanship. We have apparently passed pretty well through the era of organizing in church life. It is becoming realized that the Church often has too much machinery for its power, and church workers groan when anything additional is pro- posed in the way of detail in church work. The only objection that has been urged in Brother- hood circles to work with boys is that aroused by the fear that the Brotherhood itself is pro- posing such a complex program that it is going to give the men of the Church about all they can attend to for the present. In response to these objections it should immediately be stated that church boys' work does not involve more organization and machinery, and that, as far as the Brotherhood is concerned, boys' work is not an adjunct organization; it is one of the two or three central tasks for which the Brother- hood exists. To put it even more simply, church work with boys is not new societies, it is the Church at its work of evangelizing its own sons. And as for the Brotherhood, it is not the Brotherhood's luxury, it is the Brotherhood's job. WHAT OTHERS SAY "The gang instinct itself is almost a cry of the soul to be influenced." G. STANLEY HALL. "The bad boy is what I am, except for a friend and the grace of God." LILBURN MERRILL. [Si CHURCH WORK WITH BOYS "It is doubtful if a boy can be taught anything by counselling. We can teach him by example, but the most impressive way to gain knowledge is by experience." G. A. DICKINSON. "Education being a social process, the school is simply the form of community life in which all those agencies are concentrated that will be most effective in bringing the child to share in the inherited resources of the race, and to use his own powers for social ends. I believe that education, therefore, is a process of living, and not a preparation for future living." JOHN DEWEY. "Education is friends seeking happiness together." EPICURUS. HINTS FOR FIRST HAND STUDY Did you ever belong to a "gang" when you were a boy? Did you respond readily to its influences? How did its influence compare in potency with those of the sermons you heard when a boy? In the shaping of your ideals? In the regulation of your conduct? Which influenced you the more in these directions, the "gang" or your Sunday-school? Were these two sets of impressions antagonistic or simply utterly unrelated? Whose fault is it that the Church and its school are not more attractive to growing boys? Is it fair to say of the Church that it seldom honors boys by taking the trouble to understand them? Considering their impressibility, their peril, and their possibility, are our own churches giving boys all they deserve? Does the Church service or the Sunday-school session give much opportunity for the incarnation of adults in boys, referred to above? Do they give much chance for living out any of the moral life together? What ought we to do then? [6] WHAT CHURCH WORK WITH BOYS MEANS OUTLINE FOR STUDY OF THE TOPIC The ways by which adults may influence boys: By example. By religious teaching. By personal work. In club life. The advantages and limitations of each method. The "gang" vs. the chaperoned boys' club: studied as to sponta- neity, flexibility, permanency, moral influence. SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER READING ON THIS TOPIC G. Stanley Hall, Adolescence, Vol. II, pp. 417-448. F. G. Bonser, Chums, a Study of Youthful Friendship. Pedagog- ical Seminary, June, 1902. [7] II THE WAY OF GOD WITH A BOY The heading of this chapter is suggested by that beautiful title which Horace Bushnell selected for his proposed autobiography, "The Way of God with a Soul." While a full study of the religious development of boys is impossible here, it does seem wise to furnish an outline sufficient for us to understand clearly how the boy is develop- ing as an individual, as well as in his relation to his group, and so that we may see just where the social instinct in a boy's life emerges in reference to his personal development. The reader is referred to the accompanying chart prepared by Professor G. Walter Fiske, of Oberlin, which presents a conspectus of the subject which is unifying, and is as accurate as any chart can be. The column on "Religious Development" has been inserted by the author for completeness. By studying this chart, it is apparent that the boy passes in succession through religious periods which have their parallels in race history. By the time a boy comes into the reach of the social instrumentalities of the Church, he has passed out of the period of religion as instinct, has secured nearly all that is to come to him from the period of religion as habit, and is dwelling either in the region of religion as sentiment or of religion as [8] THE WAY OF GOD WITH A BOY o S 1 rt RACE EPOCHS RACIAL PROTOTYPE 1 aJ *c i OH Patriarchal Period S G S 1 CO The Tribal Period Limited Democracy t Monarchy i W. Council 'Brav< _ TT J *. J T* 'U n co J CO 2 51 3 OH a x ^2 ; . 3s H ^S d The Feudal Period Monarchy The Revolutionary Period of the Consti tutional Monarchy The Republic : Social-Democracy in Self-governing State i u u ^0 *> S 3| (U o o 4) W J Z S ,0 3 J3 U .C 60 w~ rt J < < 3 S ITS U Hffi H ^ t- C c c *; a C jj li .2 tJ .sf.S .2 ^ .2 g .? S .0 .2J= .60 60 "S ti o ** ti 'i3 "* ^ "3 o 5 t) 1 " 1 ^i ^ g t> O ^P P* W r* **H -C3 ^ J3 jS ^f- ^_ a H H H^ h H 09 b | .a. IS 2 CJ= .o.i_ A" 2= > c 8 3.8 3 6C U O 60 i PU Q i 2 o |j| r/. *-! 3 -^ *- * f i * T3 W JS ScS-2 aa * M S ., 3 u OH 3 -"S i"8 H Si o 4-1 L-) 'C JS-. _z: > "C F 1 " " 'C *^ O *u U X O'o tJ 3 "o CA) (i! c **'& h< u ,^OH f-H Q. t> X U u l> g ^ 13 CO * I o u> oo , ^, in i u *** 1 VO 1 - Til& "J& | a _ g M O >< t^i !^ ^ 2co ^"^co JjO OH "0 W o u u . k. fe] ^ *"O "3? V C a u V V M S* C W 5-a w Ja X flJ o =5 u ."2^ ii u J^ H C 4 - ^H o "Q ^> o ^ WJflQ 11 13 PQ T3 (5 -X O Messenger service 84 Nature study 67 Older boys, special work with 33 Perils of boys 34 Periods of boys' development 8, 9, n, 13 Phi Delta Pi 68 Play . . 22, 25, 61 Preparation of boys for church membership 56 Racial prototypes of boys' development 9 Religious development of boys 9, 13 Religious nurture 96 Reserve of boys 2, 14 Resourcefulness, period of 9, 16 Revivals 10, 14 Self-assertive period 9, II, 13 Self-government in clubs 62 Sentiment, period of IO Sex, influence of 13 Sex-instruction 34, 35 Stages of boy lif 9 Summer work with boys 63 Sunday-school courses 3 3 * 9^, 97 extension 19, 20 function of the .... 47 methods 30 Temperament, influence of 13 Text-books for Sunday-schools 97 Theatre, the . .36, 40, 42 Training leaders 28 Vocational training 4> 43 Will-progress of boys 9 Woodcraft Indians, the 66, 73 [105] University of California SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 305 De Neve Drive - Parking Lot 17 Box 951388 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90095-1388 Return this material to the library from which it was borrowed. UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY !! II Mil Mill III! II I! HIM Hill III III HIM || A 001 013 175 3 SOUTHERN BRANCH, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LIBRARY, LOS ANGELES, CALIF, Uni