THE FINANCIAL BASIS -OF- EVANGELIZATION. A Paper Read at the Missionary Convention op Synod of Michigan, 1879, By the REV. JNO. C. HILL. PUBLISHED BY ORDER OP THE SYNOD. TYY evangelization I mean every scheme of Gospel Work, not merely the heralding of the Gospel at home and abroad, but every collateral scheme; the training of the ministry, the erection of buildings for churches and schools, the translation and printing of the Bible and a religious literature. It includes everything that is necessary to fulfil our Lord’s command: “ Preach the Gospel to every creature.” This work is of such a nature that it must have a financial basis. The Gospel cannot preach itself. Religion cannot be perpetuated by innoculation. It requires money to do it. The Gospel is not free. It never was; somebody has always had to pay for it. 2 The very first religious actions of which wc have record involved a financial question. The first sacrifices were beyond all doubt offered in accordance with Divine instruction, and in such offerings there is essentially a financial element. The blessings of salvation are free, but the Gospel is not salvation. It is the news of salva¬ tion. News costs .money. We obtain in our morning paper, for five cents, news that often costs many thou¬ sand dollars. Now the Gospel is the way by which the blessings are brought to us, but it costs money to do it. The Gospel cost from the very first, and it will until the Lord comes. When religion was universal, the father was the priest of the household; under such conditions we might think that religion did not require money to keep it alive, but it did. There is no priest without an altar, and a priest and an altar are nothing without a sacrifice, and a sacrifice costs something. We find Noah, Job and Melchisedeck performing the functions of priests, making- offerings—and these involved expense. After the cere¬ monies of religion were systematized by Moses, and a more elaborate ritual established, religion becomes more expensive, and the amount that each one was to give, was fixed by divine law. One tenth was the minimum t In addition to the tithe however there were offerings; these came from the people of their own free will, and it has been computed that the amount from this source exceeded the total of the tithes. The tithe however was not first used under the Mosaic economy. We find references to the custom in the days of Abraham, Job and Melchisedeck, and in addition to this we have a score of references in the 3 classics of Rome and Greece to a similar custom, the devoting of a tenth of one’s increase to the gods, or a tenth of the spoil of war as a thanksgiving for victory. It is clear that the devoting of the tenth was from the very first a divine institution, as much so as the institu¬ ting of sacrifice. We would not find people in widely different circumstances doing the same thing unless the custom had a common origin. The tithe we believe was an essential part of religion. No one takes it for granted that everything that was written in Moses’ laws was then known for the first time. This is very evident, as already shown, on comparing previous scripture refer¬ ences with well known heathen customs. We must therefore see that a great part of these laws were simply the crystalization of the well known and at one time uni¬ versal religious customs of mankind. Moses’ laws were designed to save religion, what there was left, for the world and secure a basis for future growth. This tenth was required by God, and if it was not paid he considered it robbery. “ Will a man rob God ? Yet ye have robbed me. But ye say, wherein have we robbed thee? In tithes and offerings.” Religion has been essentially the same always, money is an essential; hence we must emphasize the necessity of money under the Gospel. If in a primitive dispensation, one tenth was given and this was continued, and added to in the provision for free will offerings, under the Mosaic, we must certain¬ ly have something under the present dispensation that will secure the same end. If not a tithe—a tenth, there must be something to correspond to it. When our Lord was training his disciples for the 4 future work of organization, he knew all the circumstan¬ ces under which they would be required to act. He must have looked at the financial basis of evangelization. But we do not find the record of definite instructions given to his disciples as to all the minute details of organization and financial support, but there was instead of this, the promise of the Spirit to guide them and assist their memories. We are fully persuaded that the apos¬ tles w r ere infallibly guided in all they did in the reorgan¬ izing of the Church of God. The synagogue was the basis, the officers of the synagogue were retained in the particular church. The synagogue required money, so would the future church and her particular churches. And so we find, that no sooner does the Christian form of the church become a fact, than we have a statement made as to financial matters. “ They that believed were together and had all things in common; and sold their possessions and goods and parted with them to all men, as every man had need.” Again, a little further on in the history, we read that those who had “ lands or houses, sold them and brought the price of the things that were sold, and laid them down at the apostles’ feet; and distribution was made to every man according as he had need.” Then we find men appointed specially for this work,—the superintendence of the financial affairs of the church. In the Epistles we have frequent refer¬ ences to collections, directions for the gathering of them and references to the support of preachers. Now, as we have seen that the Gospel needs money, we cannot be¬ lieve that these directions and exhortations were given at hap-hazard, but that in every word referring to finan¬ cial as fully as to doctrinal matters, these scriptures are 5 “ inspired-of-God.” We believe that these things are the divinely established precedents for the guidance of the church in all ages. Why did not inspiration extend over from the first century on into the second and third? Simply because there was no need of it. The first gives enough of principle, precept and precedent to guide the church in the conduct of all her affairs, financial and spiritual, until the Lord himself comes again. We have in the New Testament our precedents for organization, for officers, for courts, for discipline for immorality and heresy, and for the conduct of finances as well. We have no special word from Christ, nor reference by an apostle to the fact that the law of the tithe was continued, but we must not, we cannot reason therefrom that the law is not to be at least a guide in the financial affairs of the reorganized church. Have we then any definite principle that can be put into actual practice by us to-day ? We have. The basis of the whole matter is the truth that: “ The earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof! The Lord allowed the Hebrews to use nine- tenths of what he gave them, the other tenth he reserved for himself, it was all His however. All we have is God’s, and the proper spirit in this matter that we call “giving” is not: how much can I spare for the Lord, but, how much of this that he has given me does the Lord allow me to use for myself. I repeat: All things belong to God. We cannot “give” him anything in the strict sense. We are simply permitted to use a little and our aim should be to see how little we can get along with for ourselves and accept it as God’s gift and use all the rest as he demands. This is the financial basis of the Gospel. It is 6 stated in very sweeping terms, but we do not believe it can be stated too strongly at such a time as this. The Church of Christ to-day does not seem to know what her Lord requires of her. Financial matters have for the past half century been a continual drag, and while the Lord is preparing the way for the use of what is his own, his people hold it tenaciously, as though the Lord had no right to it. Every scheme of evangelization languishes. There is a continual cry—a strong cry, for money; not only from those having charge of the great agencies of our churches, but in our individual churches for home necessities. Is this normal ? Do you believe that the Lord looks with favor on such a condition of things ? How can we expect his blessing when we rob him ? It is robbery to refuse to refund his own. It is robbery to build such gorgeous churches that we cannot pay for, or to hamper ourselves in any way in aiding various schemes of evangelization! Why is it that our churches in foreign fields add more to the Lord than our church¬ es at home in proportion to their members ? I believe it it is because most of them are organized on an apostolic financial basis. Why is it that our great Presbyterian Church is almost standing still ? Five years ago our net increase in membership was about 29,000, the next year it dropped to 22,000, the next to 10,000 and last year our net gain was only about 7,000. Read our financial re¬ cord and you will find that while the church is increas¬ ing in the aggregate, yet the amount set apart to God is steadily decreasing. I believe we are cursed with a curse, even this whole nation—“ Bring, ye, then, all the tithes” -a tithe to the Jew, but it is a tithe and a great deal more for the Christian — li Bring ye, then, all the * 7 tithes into the storehouse, and prove me now herewith, saith the Lord of Hosts; if I will not open you the win¬ dows of heaven and pour you out a blessing.” Do not say, this is in the Old Testament and that it referred to the Jews. It is in God’s word and is addressed to God’s people and if he found occasion to rebuke them so, he by this word also rebukes us, and that promise and its conditions are for us as though we only received them as a revelation from the Lord to-day. Why is it that evangelization is hampered for want of money ? It is clearly because the Lord’s people have not been instructed properly on this subject. Many ministers are afraid to preach about money; peo¬ ple will call them beggars. The people sometimes ask : When is this continual begging to stop ? I would say, stop it at once, if it is begging. It is not begging, it is simply asking for the Lord what is his own, and this is never to stop, I say, until the Lord himself conies again. Every minister and elder would acknowledge that there ought to be a better state of things financially all along the line. Well, then, if there ought to be, there may be. How are we to bring it about ? Preach the Word. Be of good courage. Fear not. It is in the Word, it is enjoined. You cannot go astray in it. I find it all through. It is a part of the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ, and we fail in preaching the Gospel unless we make plain to the people that there must be a substantial financial basis for our work of evangeliza¬ tion. People may not like it at first. They will not. It is quite natural. The natural heart receiveth not the things of the Spirit. And this financial basis of evangelization is one of the things of the Spirit, and clearly revealed by the Spirit in the Word of God to be the law of the church, and the natural heart, of course, does not like to believe in it any more than it takes pleasure in being told that it is under the condemnation of God’s law. But if we preach the whole Gospel with its financial basis in faithfulness, God will take care of the results.