3A-\.02. M9^ gilrrarxv / /. ^ .' ^ /^^ y// • ^^ ^^^^i^-yyi^r^.^^A'^ ^i^T^^ THE NORWEGIAN INVASION OF SCOTLAND IN 13 6 8. THE NORWEGIAN INVASION OF SCOTLAND iisr iQ es A TRANSLATION FROM COMMUNICATED TO THE AECHiEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF GLASGOW Br HUGH TENNENT, Esq. of Wellpaek. GLASGOW: PRINTED BY BELL & BAIN, 15 ST. ENOCH SQUARE. 1862. .S>1 Y?^ TO » THE GLASGOW ARCHilOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Gentlemen and Fellow-Members, I have much pleasure in dedicating tliis Httle volume to you. The publication originated under the circumstances mentioned in the accompan}dng Preface, written by my esteemed friend, the Rev. Dr. Forbes, to whom, in com- mon with Mr. Edward Wish art, of Leith, I am greatly indebted for having so efficiently accomplished the labours of translation. The subject is most interesting, and pecuharly appropriate for the investigation of our Society. If by the perusal of these pages you shall be led to inquire into the important era in Scottish liistory which is associated with the battle of Largs, and in some measure to surround with the light of truth what is at present dark and uncertain, I shall be amply requited for any trouble imposed on me by this effort, humbly put forth on your behalf, and with the aim of extending the influence of the Society. I have the honour to be, Gentlemen and Fellow-Members, Your most obedient Servant, HUGH TENNENT. Wellpark, 5th February, 1862. 185546 PKEFACE. Having been indebted to the kindness of Mr. Tennent for a pre- sent of the oiiginal work, npon perusal I found that, besides much information concerning the invasion of the Continental kingdoms by the Norwegians, such as France, &c., during the preceding centuries, it contained a very minute detail of the invasion of Scotland in 1263. Tliis epoch is described by Principal Robert- son as the dawn of authentic Scottish history, as all beyond is mere doubtful tradition or absolute fable; for any historical records that the nation possessed were, by Edward I., the brother-in-law of Alexander III., earned to England and destroyed, that their testimony to the national independence of Scotland might be cancelled and lost. As an expression of my esteem for my much- valued friend, the donor of the work, I translated the third chapter of this treatise, and presented it to him for his private perusal, without the remotest view to publication. After this I was requested by him to translate the whole, but was compelled to decline the proposal, in consequence of my other avocations. Accordingly he applied to Edward Wishart, Esq., of Leith, to whom he was recommended as a gentleman well versed in the Norwegian langiiage, who kindly undertook the duty, and translated the whole of the chapters bearing upon the subject. As the work passed through the press I carefully collated the translation by the original, and presume to recom- mend it as a faithful and not uninteresting version of the history. Some difficulty occurred as to the precise rendering of Norwegian terms ; on these I consulted F. Bentzen, Esq., Danish Consul, who kindly afforded every assistance. VI FEEFACE. The reader will easily recognize that the term " Southern Islands" describes the Hebrides, so called to distinguish them from the Orkney and Shetland Islands, the northern possessions of Norway. The Lendermen were feudatories or vassals of the crown, who held their property by royal grant, and weie dis- tinguished from the tenant class, or Boender, probably so called because they were bound to render certain services to entitle them to a right to their farms or holdings. The work of Peofessoe ]\Iuxch embraces the history of Norway from the earliest period to its union with Sweden in 1319, and consists of six vols, octavo. It evinces very extensive research, the materials being derived, not only from Norwegian authors, but from the chronicles and histories of the Middle Ages, belonging to other nations, such as those of Bede, William of Malmesbury, Sunon of Durham, &c., connected with Britain. In treating of the Norwegian literature of the thirteenth century, the author has a lengthened dissertation on the Norwegian Saga, and indicates the origin and authority of the more celebrated of these writings, to which he attaches high authority as faithful records of con- temporary events. We find that every king had liis 8aga, which appears to have combined the nature of a biography with that of a history of his reign. Upon the merits of this question we do not pretend to pronounce any judgment, but shall leave it to the investigation of those whose oppoi'tunities may be more favoiu'- able for prosecuting the inquiry. If the communication made by Me. Tenxent shall have the effect of stimulating research, of making more extensively known the original work of Me. Munch, and of enlarging in any degree the limits of modern authentic history, its object shall have been fully attained. JOHN FORBES. Glasgow, 2bth January, li^