MASTER NEGA TIVE NO. 93-81167-10 MICROFILMED 1993 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES/NEW YORK ^ as part of the Foundations of Western Civilization Preservation Project" Funded by the NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES Reproductions may not be made without permission from Columbia University Library COPYRIGHT STATEMENT The copyright law of the United States - Title 17, United states Code - concerns the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or other reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or resGarch." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copy order if, in its judgement, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of the copyright law. AUTHOR: GRIEVE, LUCIA CATHERINE GRAEME TITLE: DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY ... PLACE: NEW YORK DA TE : 1898 •V Master Negative # COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT V- i BIBLIOGRAPHIC MICROFORM TARGET Original Material as Filmed - Existing Bibliographic Record I 880^129 G87 Grieve, Lada Catherine Graeme, 1862- Death and burial in Attic tragedy. Part i. Death and the dead ... New York, 1898. I 83 p. 24r. Thesis (ph. d.) — Columbia university. Vita. ^^/^^ ^«^ Bibliography: p. 10-12. D000,lg 9 ^ / 1^ ^^f^ -€opy-in-Cla88ic8- L376.7CX0 Another copy. 1598. G871 IS -i 1 ■1 \ Restrictions on Use: FILM SIZE: 7<^' 34 51Z Library of Congress I) 8-13611 TECHNICAL MICROFORM DATA yt--^ REDUCTION RATIO: //v IMAGE PLACEMENT: lA ^ IB IIB DATE FILMED: ^^ /^^^> INITIALS i!!^±^___ FILMED BY: RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS. INC WOODBRIDGE. Association for Information and Image Management 1100 Wayne Avenue. Suite 1100 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 301/587-8202 Centimeter 1 2 3 4 5 Imiliiiiliiiiliiiili iiii rrr Inch es TTTT I 6 7 iliiiiliiiil 8 llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllMllllMllMllllllllllllMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 10 11 llllllllllll 1 LO !f LI 1.25 T 12 13 14 15 mm Ik 28 2.5 ■^ 1^ 2.2 ■ 80 ■^ II 4.0 2.0 l£ »i u ISihs.u. 1.8 1.4 1.6 TTT llllllllllllllllllllll I 5 1 MRNUFfiCTURED TO RUM STRNDRRDS BY PPPLIED IMfiGE, INC. ^^ . "i- ^^■"^ •^^.■. i .^. ,% 4*^ % AC' >1-A < ^ ■>,^^, % V^': ':;i 1^^.' 1'/'t*v /v.*J»]-«f >*=>:{-:^»j^e*.f ;'v -t^' ^•^ p^irr ^r87~i r>^'' >» *^ v- i 4 in tftje ©its ^f l^^xxr "^oxU .^^ r^ .». 1 ;5if '*■■ ••• •■ '•1 I ^^S-' t" V!*. -Vi ▼>rf *3 •• ,] e *T* gitr^t^g ..^**it L^^ "^ ^ ^ >. ..•^* > -^.T* e>v^ f/-*, '^^v>^ »* .•«• ■ft ' ■&-^ -p 4 x# Ut^*. %:^ Slf" V, J I . •• • 1 » I • • •,* » • I • • • » I I DEATH AND BURIAL IN AHIC TRAGEDY' PART I DEATH AND THE DEAD BY LUCIA CATHERINE GRAEME GRIEVE, A. M. • « » SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE Faculty of Philosophy Columbia University NKW YORK < A ■ • c c t t ( t • t ,• « » t t t ( t *«* «• t « • , • • • • • • • ■ ••••••••••• •• • • •• *! • • • • • • t • « • • i • • • « • t • • . * e ( « f • .« • e • • •• t . • « • • < ', • « 1 1 I t t • • • • t * • • • > « 1 ( c c c Co mj> ;|itotber r 283039 TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGB Introduction 7 Bibliography lo CHAPTER I. Views Regarding Death . 13 Universality of death. Stability of burial customs. To the Greeks death was dark, unavoidable, fated, calamitous ; at times, desired and welcomed ; a separation from friends. Farewells to nature. Bad luck in name of death, in representations and imitations; in dreams of death; in uninten- tional homicide. Superstition regarding gifts from enemies. Philosophic views of the Tragedians; ai'^r^p; the Eleusinian teachings, rewards for initiated, punishment for uninitiated and mockers; Kaufmann's view; Eleusinian tone of tomb inscriptions. Death full of uncertainties. CHAPTER n. Condition and Powers of the Dead 33 The soul, according to Homer ; its size ; its mode of departure ; its un- substantiality. Ghosts; frequent in Greek story; various sorts; cloud- images; apparitions; phantoms in dreams. Stage ghosts. Ghosts of murderers ; of animals. Stories in Pausanias. Resurrection ; transforma- tion ; transmigration ; plurality of souls ; external soul. Consciousness of the dead ; readiness for vengeance; power over dreams, and gift of prophecy. Life in Hades a continuation of life on earth, in occupation, character, mis- fortunes. Influence on the future life of the present, of burial rites, of initiation, of a good life. Immortality of the souU CHAPTER III. The Other World and Those Who Dwelt There . 53 The journey of the soul. On wings ; Nike-Eros ; the butterfly. Charon, unknown to Homer ; a popular myth. The ship. Charon in Euripides. 5] s I , TABLE OF CONTENTS [6 Hermes, god of sleep and of death ; the Chthonian and the Olympian god. Death a journey by land ; with horses. Marriage of the soul to Hades ; testimony of the vases and stelae, of the Tragedians, of the inscriptions ; the Apulian amphorae. Persephone. Thanatos, double of Hermes, a myth- god, the physician; in the Alcestis ; an epichthonian deity. Offices of Thanatos, Hermes and Charon. Hades, true god of the lower world ; re- ceiver of the dead ; judge ; in Homer ; in Tragedy. Realm of Hades ; underground or in the west ; unattractive ; descriptions. Tartarus ; future punishments and rewards. Isles of the blest. The dog. Other dwellers in Erebus. Hecate. Erinyes j described by the Tragedians ; their func- tion as avengers ; their Grove at Athens ; their cult. !' i.V • • *' • » • ! • ' •••,;♦»•»»»• , , , / » » » » , » » > 5 J » » • ••,»•• •• •r.i » »» ••••••••• ••..»• • •• • •• • •••*(*<*t I I • •• • • •, ■ • • », t • » INTRODUCTION Ancient Greek life was divided into so many small separate streams, and developed so rapidly towards both its perfection and its decay, that very few statements can be true either of the whole people or of the whole period. While undoubtedly many customs survived through centuries, at the same time fashions changed from generation to generation in even the most important points; the contact with outside i?ations, the introduction of foreign religions, and the experience of new forms of government, radically and continually affected thought and life throughout the entire nation. Besides, though homogeneous in race, and to a certain extent in language, the Greeks were far from being so in any other respect. In the separate states, the development was remarkably uneven, in- dividualism was the most striking characteristic, and every city and hamlet prided itself on legends and practices pecu- liarly its own. The study of Greek life, to be properly understood, should be taken up country by country and period by period. Here- tofore this has not been possible ; now, with the multitudes of inscriptions of all sorts coming daily to the surface, with the works of long-lost authors, vases and gems, temples and palaces, perpetually unearthed, we may hope ultimately for a fairly intelligible reconstruction of the daily life and feeling of that great race to whom we owe the best of our culture and the greater part of our civilization. In the following pages I have attempted to touch but one phase of that multitudinous life, the ideas regarding death, in but one city and age, the Vth century at Athens. Convinced that the later writers, like Lucian, were not to be depended 7], 7 ••••••••• • • • • • «•• '. •♦. •«• ••• • ■ • >• • • • •••,•• I I '« I • IK • • • •• •• "•• • • ". • ••• • ■ « • 8 'bkAfk^'A^TD BURIAL /// ATT/C TMAGRD\ [« on. for the Greeks had no true archaeological sense, I went to thoJH: confcswrd rcflcctonj of daily life, the three great Tragc- dian!(. To be sure, but a .small portion of their works remains to us, but from what is le(^, many stray facts can be gleaned, which, if placed together in the light we now have from archaN>logic:i] HourccH, give i^mc t3cii of what was in the popular mind of that day. Aristophanes also throws some light on these *ubject«, but his uncurt>cd love of burlesque makes him, in the pft::ient state of our knowledge, unsafe as a g\nde- Similarly Plato, because of his pla>'fu1 cxa^eration when 5]x:aking of popular notions, and the large infusion of his own fancies into what he com- mends, is not generally to be trustcctonging to an age grown legendary, he remained a sort of standard to which many things were referred ; aside from that, through the large familiarity with his works possessed by every educated man in Athens, his influence must have been ver>' great in shaping and directing thought To Pausanias also I have often re- ferred ; for he was by nature and aflfinity an antiquarian, and, unlike Lucian. sincere and earnest, preserving many valuable details, and if sometimef; mistaken, not so through any fault of his own. Fragments of the Tragedians, being often but short quotations and frequently wholly ckitached from their context, I have in general avoided as untrustworthy to settle a disputed point, and have used only to express more tersely or in better language ideas found somewhere else ; but ^tkk Addbft is M lU 41 Id ktft CkC poM 9] t/fTKOOVCTlOlf t*%^ the influence, especially of Euriptdw. beginning in this Vth ccn- tur>'. wxs long the dominant tradition. Sejjulchral inscripUons were rare in this centuiy. and the tradition running through those of succeeding ages was, for the most part, of a later begmning, so that I have u>«d them but sparingly. The *maU but excellent treatises of Kaufmann and Iwanowitsch have been <>i much u>e fo n>c; the former especially in throwing light OH tJM, influence of the Mysteries. Tl.e latter came into my hands just a« my work waa about completed ; had I known before of the existence of this exlwustive study. I might have hcitated to attempt anythioB on a »ubject so nearly the same. As it is excejit where he has formed hin atatetncnts o«i fragmentarj^ evidence or by recasting troublesome tcjits, wherever ow paths lay toeether we have arrived independently at substan- tially the same conclusions. Rohde'* brillant work wa. « i;,tie disappoUjting for thi.i period. #incc he draws ver,' larRcly on late authors. After goinc through Homer carefully myself and drawrag my own conclusions. I found BudihoU ao complete and overflowing and pcrfcctl>- sane, that I have preferred citing his page* rather Uian entering into ai>y dlBCu«».on» of my own Prot Percy Gardner's works have been of capeciaJ value to mo. more pamcularly when supplemented. «. they were CiMiHnunlly. by kindly adWoe and criticism on my own work during a veif spent m Oxford: and I taVr .his op,H..,„,.„y .„,.,»««, tO hl.« the gratitude I frcl. Thanks are due to ProtE. D. Perry I l-mf J. U. wi.eeJcf ofColumbJa University, under whonc »..|...,v|,ton thi. I.lllc ^U*e has b««n wrought out; as w..|l «. (o Mlu A. M, A. H. Rogers of Oxford, and to teachers and <«ll..w.rtud«nU in iN.tli Universities who have helped to lighten the i.,»l, V... cao 1 ♦. t 4 lO DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY BIBLIOGRAPHY [lO "] INTR OD UCTION II Aeschyli Tragcedia. Ed. Weil. Lipsise: Teubner, 1889. Sophoclis Tragcedia. Ed. Dindorf. Lipsiae: Teubner, 1889. Euripidis Tragoedice. Ed. Nauck. Lipsiae : Teubner, 1880. Pausania Descriptio Gracia. Ed. Schubart. Lipsise : Teubner, 1881. Homer i Ilias. Ed. Dindorf. Lipsiae : Teubner, 1 890. HomtY'i Odyssey. Ed. W. W. Merry. Oxford, 1889. Tragicorum Grcecorum Fragmenta. Ed. Nauck. Lipsiae, 1889. Epicorum Gracorum Fragmenta. Ed. Kinkel. Lipsise, 1 877. Lucianus. Ed. Weise. Lipsiae, 1847. Plutarchi Vitce ParalUlce. Ed. Sintenis. Lipsiae, 1873. Bacchylides. Ed. F. G. Kenyon. London, 1897. Kaibel: Epigrammata Graeca ex labidibus conlecta. Berolini, 1878. Preger: Inscriptiones Graecae Metricae. Lipsiae, 1891. Dittenberger : Sylloge Inscriptionum Graecarum. Lipsise, 1883. — C. M. Kaufmann : Die Jenseitshoffnungen der Griechen u. Romer. Frei- burg, 1897. ^ G. Iwanowtisch : Oplniones Homerl et Tragicorum Graecorum de Inferis. In Berliner Studien, Vol. 16. 1895-6. Rohdc: Psyche. Leipzig, 1894. G. Perrot : La Religion de la Mort. In Revue des Deux Mondes, 1895. y 'K. Robert : Thanatos. Berlin, 1879. Brueckner u. Pernice : Ein Attischer Friedhof. In Athen. Mitth., 1893, pp. 73-191. Stackelberg: Die GrSber der Hellenen. Berlin, 1835. P. Gardner: A Sepulchral Relief from Tarentum. In Joum. Hell. Studies, 1884. Furtwangler: Altlakonisches Relief. In Athen. Mitth., 1882. Come : Attische Grabreliefs. Berlin, 1893-. P. Gardner- Sculptured Tombs of Hellas. London, 1896. P. Ravaisson : Le Monument de Myrrhine. Paris, 1876. E. Poitier : Les L6cythes blancs attiques. Paris, 1883. P. Walters : Rotfigurige Loutrophoros. In Athen. Mitth. 1891, pp. 371-405. Monumenti Inediti delV Institute. Roma, 1827-1885. Passerii Picturae Etruscorum. Roma, 1767-1775. Recueil de Gravures d'aprds des Vases Antiques {Hamilton Collection). Naples, 1791-5. Furtwangler: Collection Sabouroff. Berlin, 1883-7. Gerhard: Apulische Vasenbilder. Berlin, 1845. Gerhard: Auserlesene griechische Vasenbilder. Berlin, 1 840-1 858. Benndorf: Griechische u. sicilische Vasenbilder. Berlin, 1 868. Genick «. Furtwan^Ur • Griechische Keramik. Berlin, 1 883. Dumont et Champlain : Les C^ramiques de la Gr6ce Propre. Paris, 1888. Rayet et Collignon: Histoire de la C^ramique Grecque. Paris, 1888. / A. de la Borde: Collection des Vases Grecs de M. le Comte de Lamberg. Paris, 1823-4. Lenormant et De Witte : Elites des Monuments C6ramographiques. Paris, 1844-1861. y. Millingen: Ancient Inedited Monuments. London, 1822. E. Robinson: Catalogue of Greek, Etruscan and Roman Vases. (Boston Mu- seum.) Boston, 1893. Collection Camille Lecuyer: Terres-Cuites Antiques. Paris, 1882. Tllfy: Corpus Juris Attici. Pestini et Lipsiae, 1868. Gilbert: The Constitutional Antiquities of Sparta and Athens. London, 1 895. C. R. Kennedy: Demosthenes, Vol. III. London, 1880. P. Gardner: New Chapters in Greek History. London, 1892. Farnell: Cults of the Greek States. Oxford, 1896. Z. Dyer: The Gods in Greece. New York, 1894. Harrison and Verrall : Mythology and Monuments of Ancient Athens. Lon- don, 1890. M. Collignon : Manual of Mythol(^ in Relation to Greek Art. Translated by J. E. Harrison. London, 1890. Frazer: The Golden Bough. London, 1890. Hart land: The Legend of Perseus. London, 1894-5. G. F. Creuzer : Symbolik u. Mythologie. Leipzig, 1836-42. Baumeister : Denkmaler des klassischen Alterthums. Mttnchen u. Leipzig, 1885-8. M. Collignon: Manual of Greek Archaeology. Transl. by J. H. Wright. Lon- don, 1886. Tsountas and Manatt: The Mycenaean Age. Boston, 1897. Buchholz: Die Homerischen Realien. Leipzig, 1871-85. H, Blumner: Leben u. Sitten der Griechen. Leipzig, 1887, Gardner and yevons: Manual of Greek Antiquities. London, 1895. Daremher^ et Saglio: Dictionnaire des Antiquit^s. Vol. IV. Paris, 1896. Roscher: Lexikon der griech. und rom. Mythologie. Leipzig, 1884-. Papers of the American School at Athens, 1882-97. The following are also recommended : Fr. Winiewski: De Euripidis ad extremam hominis sortem spectantes tractandi ratione. Progr. Acad. Mtinster, 1890. (Other papers by this same author cited by Iwanowitsch.) De natura et indole animanim ex sententia Euripidis. (Schluss der vorstehen- den AbKandlung.) Progr. Miinster, 1864. C. F. Hermann: De vestigiis institutionum vetenim, imprimis Atticorum per Platonis de legibus libros indagandis. Marburgi, 1836. Collignon: Note sur les ceremonies fimebres en Attique. Annales de la Fa- culty de Bordeaux, 1879. I li I ; 12 DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY [12 Kumanudis : 'ArriK^g 'E'mypaal 'Eitltvu^lol. Athens, 187 1. y. Girard : Le Sentiment religieux en Grdce. Lehrs : Vorstellungen der Griechen uber Fortleben nach dem Tode. Pop- ulare Aufeatze aus dem Alterthum. Leipzig, 1875. Furtwdngler : Idee des Todes. Freiburg, 1855. E, Mam: Orpheus. Miinchen, 1895. J^eisacker: Die Todesgedanke bei den Griechen. Jahr. Konig. Gyna. zur 'Trier, 1862. M. M. Daniel: A Future Life as represented by the Greek Tragedians. Clas. Jlev., vol. iv. London, 1890. Prater: Pausanias' Description of Greece. Oxford, 1898. •Catalogue of Vases in the British Museum, I^ndon, 1893. Note. — In the first list given above all the chief authorities cited in the follow- ing pages are included, and they are referred to by the authors' names. Where reference is made to other books, the whole title is given. When fragments of the Tragedians are cited| A. stands for Aeschylus, S. for Sophocles, and £. for Euripides. \ CHAPTER I VIEWS REGARDING DEATH Ever since the advent of the human race, the law of death has held with inexorable force. The short-lived generations of men have flourished and faded, like the leaves from the trees:' and gOne-Whither the leaves go-who could tell ? For some such reason there has always been a keen sympathy between human life and nature, especially i„ her vegetable forms ; and among the Greeks this feeling was unusually intense. Plant- hfe was a continual parable of death and resurrection; and it IS a significant fact that Demeter, goddess of the grain, and Dionysus.' god of the vine, were the two divinities of the upper earth most closely connected with the dead. It is as the result of long experience in watching the growth decay, and resurrection of plants, confirming native intuition' that we must regard the instinctive belief in the continued ex- istence of the soul. For it is impossible for philosophy to prove such after-existence. Plato tried to do so in his im- mortal treatise, the Phaedo, and failed utterly. For however cogent his arguments may be to those who wish to believe at the cold touch of unprejudiced reason they collapse utterly Me has to fall back on popular superstition and the teaching of the poets. * It is not when a nation has reached its highest point of cul- ture that we must look for active belief, but rather at some ' //., 6 : 146. For souls compared to leaves, see Ba^ciyl., V., 63-7. ' I>yer: Gods in Greece. See refs. s. v. Dionysus, p. 434. '3] •3 J 'm ■ 14 DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY [14 period in its earlier history, when it is shaking off the trammels of barbarism and projecting its vague notions on a back- ground of conscious thought. Such a time was the Vth century B. C, at Athens. When, in the battle of Marathon,' she struck the decisive blow for the freedom of Europe from the oppression of Asia, at that same time she drew a distinct line of demarcation between her present and her past. Before that she was but a small state among the many which, without unity or coherence, fringed the south coast of Europe; from that moment she became a leader and head, not merelv of the brief political Athenian empire, but of the great empire of thought that finally conquered even Rome. In the burial customs and beliefs, the most stable of all in- stitutions, great changes had come about. Yet in the Vth cen- tury we find the traces, though then almost imperceptible, of an earlier stage of dark demon-worship. The present school of folklore-writers would have us believe the latter was the original and only early stage of every nation's development; but their arguments are far from convincing. What came earlier than this, in Athens at least, has not yet been dis- covered. Pausanias found curious customs prevailing in odd corners of Hellas, that seemed to have come down from primi- tive times ; and the earlier Spartan tombstones present forms and figures which must have been survivals even when they were erected. Whenever a custom shows a tendency to become fixed, we may know that the real presence of the belief is vanishing ; while change and variety denote life and growth. The Peri- clean Age presents many examples of both these truths, no- where more evident than in those burial practices, which con- tinuing, though full of contradictions, to survive for many cen- turies, Lucian ridiculed with so much wit. But to Aeschylus and his fellow-tragedians they were still ^ See Creasy* 5 Fifteen Decisive Battles. \\ I f'-' i 15] VIE PVS REGARDING DEATH ^ jr alive with meaning. To them the funeral wail, the solemn procession, the stone-marked tomb, the prayers and offerings to the deceased, were not an idle and empty show, of no benefit to the dead or to the living. Rather, the darkness of death was a thick darkness which could be felt, the stifling shadow of the tomb, the damp gloom of the vault, the keen cold wind of the sightless cavern. The lower world was a place deprived of light,' vvKrepog,^ hvavyrrroq,^ avalLog,*' UKdrog,^ fiilag,^ KiXaivog,'' ^6og,^ Kve ^ TTo66g, ov (j)pevbg apx^v^ sleeping that still cold breathless sleep,'7 rbv ael . . . ariXevrov virvov, ^Ag., 1323-24; .4«/., 808-9; i%«7.,624-S; Trad, II44; Hic.,10^\ Her., 969; /. A,, 1509; et. al. oft. "^Hip., 1388; Or., 1225. ^Pro., 1128. M/r., 437,852; H. M., 607. ^Ai., 394; O. C, 1701; Hec, 209; PAoen., 1453; Hip., 837; H. M., 563. ^Hip., 1388. 7 Pro., 433. 8 />^.^ 839. jjip^^ 1416. 9 Pro., 1129; Hip., 836. ^0 O. C, 1390; At., 395; Hel., 519; Ant., 589; Or., 176. " Sep., 403; Ale, 385, 269; Hip., 1444. See also Bacchyl. XIII, 30-1. "y^/r., 82, 272, 362; Hip., 1 193; et al. oft. " Track., 829 ; Ale, 18, 868, 394-5 ; et al. oft. ^* Ale, 301 ; Soph. Jr., 64 ; Eur. Jr., 446 ; it al oft. Eur. makes the nurse explain why, Hip., 193-7 J and gives a warning, /r., 813, //. 6-11 ; /. A., 1385-6. " Or., 1084; ^tal* ^*Phil., 860-1; Ale, 404; Per., 840-2; Track., 829-30, 1 169-73; O. T,^ 967-8. "4^., 1450-I; Track., 1005, 1041-3; Ai., 831-4; ^»/., 76. 832; Hip., 1377, 1387; see also //., 11 : 241 ; 14: 482. l6 DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY [j^ from which neither affection nor enmity nor interest could arouse him — &av6vr(av & ovSh &?iyoc aTTTerai, says Creon/ and Elec- tra' cries despairingly, d nc hf mi xm\ hopeless in its endless- ness,3 for, rig ^av6vT(.yv t/Mev e^ 'Aidov irdTuv ; a slipping away even into nothingness;* ovKiT" ovaav ohSh, Alcestis wails, in spite of the assurances of a happy future life which have been offered to her. In this last point, though we must carefully avoid dogmatism, we may clearly trace a decay in belief; for such expressions belong only to Euripides; Aeschylus never even hints that the dead are nothing, and Sophocles* utterances are equivocal. Perhaps really the worst feature of death "was that it was utterly unavoidable, that sometime, somewhere, it must over- take its victim, and that there was no escape.^ For in spite of what some modern philosophers say, those evils which are inevitable are always the hardest to be borne. Here courage and valor avail nothing ; and the meeker graces of submission and resignation did not appeal very strongly to the fancy of the Hellenes. This feeling of helplessness in the strong ex- presses itself even from Homeric times,^ and in Sophocles only the words are changed, 1 O. 6'., 955; A/c, 875, 937-8; S. £/., 1 170; Tro., 606-7, 638; CAo., 517-8. *S. EL, 356; Tro., 1248-9; Ale, 1091 ; Hel., 1402-3. ^H. M., 297, 145-6; Ag., 568-9, 1019-21 ; Eum., 647-8; Per., 689-90 ; 0. C, 1701, 1706-7 ; Fhil., 624-5; S. EL, 137-9 ; /. T.^ 481 ; Ale, 985-6; et aL *Alc., 387, 322, 381, 390; /. A., 125 1; Tro., 632-3; S. EL, 1 166-7; HeL, 1421. Hades is called aidrjTMv, At., 608. See Iwanowitsch, in Berliner Studien, 16, p. 57-8. * See BacchyL, III, 51-2. • Od.t 24: 29. ;// J 17] VIEWS REGARDING DEATH ^7 the fate of death is for all.^ Closely akin to its certainty was its relentlessness ; what it had it held : teri J* ovK. evE^oSov, dAAwc TE irdvTiDC X^l Kara x^ovoc ^eol Tm^eIv ajJLEivovg elalv ^ fie^iivacj says the ghost of Darius." Like Homer, the Tragedians consider death the work of fate,' and therefore just and right.* In Aeschylus and Sophocles especially, it is often the work of some of the gods,^ particu- larly of Zeus,^ or on special occasions of Phcebus,^ Athene,* etc.; but though the gods could slay, they could not avert death even from the man they loved.9 Sophocles and Euripides have a fancy for attributing ^° it to rlxVf ari abstraction which was rapidly becoming personified in Athens, and which, curiously in contrast with this attribution, was quickly developing into a sort of tutelary divinity of the city, the dya^^ rvxn of the legal inscriptions standing in the usual place of the name of some god, which in Athens would be Athene. This attribution may denote a change in the sentiment of the people towards 1 .S". £/., 860; Afti., 361-2; O. C, 1220-4; Ale, 21, 112-35, '47» 4'9» '^ ^^'* Eur.fr., 46; et al. * Per., 688-90; Ag., 1360-1 ; Ale, 1 12-8, 132-6. See refs. p. 16, n. 3. » By Moira: Ag., 145 1-2; Cho., 910-I ; Ale, II, 33; Eum., ^24; Phil.y 331; Au,i\^\etaL fidipav {^avdrov), Med., 987; Ag., 13 14, 1462, 1365; et aL /ii6pog = fate of death, Ag., 329; Hee, 695. TTETrpoyrai, Ale, 20-2, 26-7, 105, 147, et al. b<}>ei2.eTai, Ale, 419. * Ale, 49, 122-9, 3-4» ^^ ^^' ^ Sep., 689-90; O. T., 27 J Ai., 950,970; And., 1204; lott, 1244-5; Ale, 297—8. So BacchyL, V., 1 34— 5, in war, -^dvarov re ipei roiaiv av Saifzov ^iTiif. « O. C, 1460-1 ; Ag., 362-6; Ale, 34; et al. T Phil., 335. 8 ^j., 952-3. > Hip., 1339-40 ; Ale, 52-3 ; Od., 3 : 236-9 ; et aL 10 a T, 263; S. fr., 865; Ale, 889; Cye, 605-6; Ai., 1028; dvarvxog daifiuv, S. EL, H56-7. i8 DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY [i8 1 !l death, or may be due simply to the tendency to make Athene the one supreme divine power in Athens. It should be remarked that the gods who send death, Zeus, Apollo, Artemis, Ares, and the rest of their circle, are not the gods who receive the dead. Death from whatever source was a great calamity ; ^eovc dp&aavraq av&' brov iJavrt. Among an emotional people like the Athenians, by the simple reaction of feeling a morbid desire for death laid hold on them under the stress of any great calamity, and it was even found by contrast to possess many advantages. The Chorus<^ hearing of Agamemnon*s death, crj^ out, Kar&aveJp upareV irencuTipa yap fwlpa rrj^ rvpawido^^ "It is better for us to die, for death is preferable to this tyranny!" and later they wish,7 n^ ya ya, el^' ip: kdk^u. But such expressions are not to be taken seriously. The Greeks in 1 / A„ I416; H, M., 281-2. « 7. ^., la^a. ' Ant., 220, ?8o-l ; AL, 215, 4 ^^.^ ^y^ ^Alx,,24^i Ifac, iiat>.t;^. £L, 134^-55: i?. ^>s, 496-^: ^«., 95»«5 I '4r.. «53«J J^'*1i^\ -^.Af/,, 804-5; aC.i«$-9o: 5:j?/.,8it; O. T,, i«57» '^^'^ '3*^33; Ttm4h., 16-7; rr«^. 630-1 : ///r., 497-$ ; A/X/^ 146-7; a aL^ vtrjr comiDoci. V •■» 19] VIEWS REGARDING DEATH i^ their moments of depression found life full of evils from which none were exempted :* a»rai»r' airfffictv rbv 61 alHtvo^ XP^**^^ »' and of which death was not the greatest," ov yap "^avelv ix^iarov, nor long life the least,3 ovdh yap iXyoc ohv ^ koXX^ C6v» Death was then a release from evils : T^ yap &avelv kXev&epovpai ^iXai6,KT(jv kokCiv, is the consolation of the hunted Danaidae ;♦ a medicine for sou rov/s, piyiffTovdp/jLaKov, Macaria,^ no less a homeless wanderer, find.^ it; and the tortured Prometheus^ envies those who can so easily end their woes. It was preferable to blindness,' to evil re}>ort ,• to living among enemies ^ and without friends ;'** and to the weary toiler it was welcome if merely for its rest; for says Herakles," at last realizing the true import of the oracle : Tolg yap ^avovat pdx^o^ ov npoayiyverat. And Orestes," persecuted by men and gods, proudly refuses to bewail his approaching fate.'s Vet suicide w^as not common except in case of overwhelming disgrace like that of Aia^» or to avoid a lingering but inevitable death like Antigone ; thus showing that these expressions were the result of merely transitory emotion. Draco'* after cool reflection declares he has no higher punishment for the greatest crimes; and in oaths '5 such words as, " If I speak not the truth I ought to die," abound as the strongest form of asseveration. ^Asr., 553-4- *S. £1, X007. *A. Su/>., 8o»-3; /^«»/.» 463-4. • ^V^.. 753 4 J •$>/.. 3J^. 6H4. ^S.Jr., 509; cf. O. C, 1225-7. * ///r., 595-6; //*.. 63$. » O. T„ I3)WL ^^^'t 393- " TJwi., 1 173. Si9-3a » /. 7!, 484-9. ** Fee the tre*tmeM pC lht& whok mlfcct, lor« of life Mti hatrtd c^ death, ice »• /Xy/. .SW.. i6w »» a 7:. 943-4, 66i-a; FAil^ i^u I 20 ^EA TH AND B URIAL IN A TTIC TRA GED Y [20 But whatever advantages death might or might not possess, it brought with it one great and certain calamity, the separation from friends and relatives." To us with our long-inherited be- lief in an endless reunion beyond the grave, perhaps with our colder philosophy and boasted greater self-control, the in- tense agony of parting from loved ones felt by the emotional and affectionate Athenians seems far-fetched and overdrawn, especially when we remember how often the fate of war not only slew husband and brother, but scattered forever the survivors of even noble families into the hard lot of slavery. Death and distance in such cases amounted to much the same thing, and the traveller's garb on the monuments generally de- notes the journey to the tomb.* As we might expect, very affecting are the Ieave-takings,3 though in most cases too long for quotation, which the Tragedians have portrayed for us. And while the groups figured on the tombstones may some- times refer to a reunion, yet the sentiments expressed are more often of the sorrow of parting, such as the following inscrip- tion^ from the Vth century, accompanying the representation of a lady taking leave of her mother and little daughter; 'KivQoq KovpL6i(f) re irdaei koX firjTpl Xnrovaa Kal Trarpl t<^ ^vaavTL TioT^v^kvT} kv&dde Kelrat. Equally touching are the impassioned farewells to nature,^ like Iphigeneia's x^ipe /loi doc, or that last apostrophe by Aias before falling on his sword on the sandy Ilian shore : ** And thee, O present glory of the shining day and chariot- borne sun, I salute for the last time truly and never again ^K M., 512-3; A/cSje-y, 1133-4; ^«>., 838; Tro., 487-8; i^o(iovf^oc rb bvof^a HadeS Wh^hruva WCalth-giver KO^vCLV avr6v. The name Pluto occurs in the Tragedians^ as an equivalent for Hades, but it is rare and seems to have been introduced chiefly for the metre. The visible representation of death was still more ominous ; and when, during the Peloponnesian War, the fleet for Syra- cuse was being sent out, the fact that just at that time the feast of Adonis was being celebrated and the efiigies of his dead body filled the streets, was noted with gloomy foreboding,^ especially after the disaster. It is not likely that the Greeks thought that the display of these effigies actually caused the disaster, but rather that it was a sign from the gods ; though they may have had a feeling inherited from earlier times that there was some evil influence connected with them. The re- lation of cause to effect is rarely clear in the popular mind. 1 Kaibel, 6. « //., 12 : 1 16. * O. T., 939-42. M^.. 636-7, 1247; Ale, 139, 512-21; Hec, 180-1; /. A., 855-73; ^»>.. 797-8CX); et al. oft. • Plato : Cratyl. 403 a. • ^^^ ^ \ ^U,, 360 ; H. M., 808. iFlut. Alcib., 18; Nic, 13; Tkuc^x 30; Prater: Golden Bough, I, 284-5- 23] ^lEWS REGARDING DEATH .,. To bring the fact home to an individual by calling him dead was a degree worse : Helen asks doubtfully, and Menelaus finding no other way oi safety answers,* KaKoq ftev dpvig- el Se KEpdavu Uyetv^ €Toifi6g elfii fi^ '&avd)v Ady^ ^avelv. We must notice how careful each is to put //^ ^avdv before the inauspicious word. Orestes,' when Electra wails over the urn, " Ah me unhappy if I am to be deprived of thy tomb! " checks her hastily with the words, "Speak auspiciously!" The Chorus 3 in the Agamemnon raging in fierce helplessness against Aegisthus, snatch up his last word, and twisting it to a new meaning as if they would wrest fate, cry out, dexo^hoL^ Uytiq ^aveiv as. It was a piece of daring, almost of impiety on the part of Orestes, in keeping with his rather reckless char- acter, to bid the Paedagogus report him as dead ; and realizing this, as we have just seen he did, he defends himself rather knavishly;* ri ydp fie AvTreZ tov^\ orav ?i6y(f) ^avuv ipyoiai ao)-&C) Ka^eviyKcjfiai K?iiog • SoKo) fikv, ovSev pfjfia avv KipSec kukSv. V6ij yap elSov noXXcKig koX rovg aoii>ovg Uyu fiarrrv ^vyaKovrar eli?' brav SSjuovg IMuoLV av-&iQy EKTeTifiTpn-ai nleov. Such a deception, for different reasons, was practiced by Pythagoras and some of his pupils, by Heraclitus, Odysseus, and others, and their success was probably due not only to the popular superstition, but to the wonder they excited that they could thus dare fate and live. In later times (beginning we do not know how early), to be actually believed dead and to have the funeral ceremonies performed, was a very serious matter; for in that case, according to the law quoted by Plutarch,s the person was deemed polluted : M vofii^tiv dj^f, ,i^S' I Ilel., 1050^2. « S. EL, 1209-10. ^Ag., 1653 ; Hec, 1279-84. 'S. EL, 59-64. 5 pi^t. Quaes. Rom., 5. r - i 2 DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY [24 mentirig on this law « describes at length the -ru^us proce^^ through which persons once really supposed dead had to go to be restored to their former rights as living men; and the names v^o,.o. and ipeiv Track,, 555-81. » Pro,, 103-5. *^^-, 1304. Mi;, 479-80. 1 26 DEA TH AND BURIAL IN A TTIC TRACED Y [26 And again he says:^ 6(TTff di ^vrrrHrv -davarov bppuSel "kiav and when he is old : ' tifl <^vvaL rbv anavra vm ^70V' rb cT, end <^vv, Tzokv deirepov, cjf TdxiOTa^ as if he had found life, in spite of his many SUCCeSSeS fuU Of cai and weariness.3 i„ Euripides, the friend and follower of ^Sph^rs. we expect and find a different H- o^ th-.ht. He is speculative, and speaks « of awo .x^,^ ^-. and says . 6 vovg iiUvarov elg aMvarov alW «/^^c^<^»'» something which comes rather near our notion of pure^rit The Whole theory however !s abstrusc. and ai% 311 entirely Lrtarn concepT It was a Homeric term for the abode of the tods and as a later Athenian inscription calls .t vyp6c tmp it was probably conceived of as in the cloudy slcy and it is often mentioned interchangeably with ovpa^. trom various lines of the Helena^ taken together we should judge that oipcv^cwas the place, and al^P the substance. But we need not suppose that every mind held the same .mage o so neeanoib pp thoueh the stone-cutters intang b e an idea as a.%; and, tnougn •• thouehtS may have risen no higher than the cloudy sky. the poet and the seer doubtless looked into the vast spaces be- i5./r., 865. « a c, 1225-7. 3 See S. £1., 1007, and/r., 509, quoted on p. 19. ^Med., 1039 ; ^/^.. 21 ; ^^'*' ^°^7 i ^- ^'* ^S^^' ^Hel.t 1014-6; see E.fr.,A^1' • Gardner: New Chapters in Greek History, pp. 330-2. •'Ilel., 583-4* 33-4» 705. I2'9. 605-7. 27] VIEIVS /REGARDING DEATH V yond. The inscription over the warriors slain at Potidaea 432 B. C, reads : » and Kaufmann,» remarking on this, adds that al^^p^ according to Anaxagoras and the other philosophers, is not the soul- substance merely, that is. the breath, the air, but Olympus, the abode of the gods, Elysium ; he quotes also two IVth century inscriptions : 3 '" v and, V,vpvfx&XOv rfwxi^v koI l7repi61ovq diavoiag ai^VP ?M/i7rpbc Ixei, aC>fMa 6k rhfi^og b6e l^T u V'"^'''^ '"''"^''' ''"'^"^" ^^^^^i^o which indicates that whether by invitation of the Potidaean one or not tws Sne cu«r1 'T ;'^ ^°""°" '^™'"^'°^ °^ ^^^ ^-^ Stone-cutter. Sophocles/ too, once speaks of ^s^- - • .u sense ot the future wor d w th the wnrri a- ^ r . TT r » . woro Swai used so often in agam he says, , ^,„, ^j,^,, , ,,,, ^, jf ^^ese terms were equiva- en Euripides also speaks of the ai,(,a,iya. into which Elec- ra sends groans for her father to hear; and in addition places Z^Z'JT'' "-'''' '-'"'' '^ '^ ^'^ -- ^'"•n^. '■-away av' iypbv ainzrairrv aUkpa iropcu yai- ac 'E/J.Aav/af , aarepag ea-Trepovg^ ohv olov aXyoc Irra^ov, (piAai. People used to disparage the Eleusinian Mysteries on the ^Kaibel, 21; II., 5, 6. *^*''"92. »ac,i47,. « E. El, 59. , ^^^^ ^^g_^ 1 / U I ■■« i ,8 DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY [28 ground that they really gave but little con^fort concerning the future life But Kaufmann,' in his admirable httle book, has hoTn L they were not as ineffectual as - ^^erly ^^^^ posed Nagelsbach, he tells us,' m commentmg on the d.Her ences between the three great sets of Mysteries, says : " In he Omhic men sought for purity and holiness; m the D.onys.ac fofbSssedness Ld ease; in the Eleusinian, for comfort and e t'n he future life." It will be remembered m how much fevor the Mysteries, especially the Eleusinian, were he W; wha mmense numbers of people, even from afar, were m.t.ated , irhow carefully the secrets, though known to so many, were kept : and this all goes to show how deeply these teach.ngs were impressed on the hearts of the people, and how truly these sentiments entered into their life and thought.s When we look closely we find traces, often very clear ones Of These Eleusinian teachings regarding the future hfe. The Mvstae in the Fro^s* claim that .... i^ bdOHg the bkSSingS wWch Herles L somewhat irreverently descnbed m an Tartr passage. The Pseudo-Plato^ claims for them a front Sace in the realms of the blest: 5,„,c ,^ oJv ev r, C«v ^«^.- "ra^^c m. eic r. r. ..,. ..^ oU.w, .-. etc. (a ^e-npt. n the Elvsian fields), h^av^o roic .^."//'^^'f *<^' "^ '^'""''''"- "^ t sSn ;hat the ikinitiated are not excluded ^om ^le-dn^ if thev have led good lives, but that the m.t.ated have the Sonor Of *e front'rank. a reward which appealed to the amb.- Ss and emulous Greeks. In Polygnotus" great pa.ntmg of Hades in the Lesche at Delphi, we- see the mfluence of the Sleusinian Mysteries throughout. At the very begmn.ng^ . C. M. Kaufmann: DU JemHUhoffnun.en dcr GrUcHen u. Rmn, .897. :"et:::;r;;= ... No.e.Uo.Ke«re.popu.ari.yorthena»«De.. teios among the Modem Greeks, surely a survival. • Frogs, 454-5- '54-7- M*.VA..37ic.d. See A»M, p. 288, n. I. *Paus., 10: 28: 3- 29J VIEWS REGARDING DEATH 29 Cleoboea is seated in Charon's boat, holding the mystic cyst «'/?"T^f, on her knees, receiving honor because she first intro-' duced the Mysteries into Thasos. On the tombstones and vases we frequently find this box. often called a " jewel-box " represented in the hands or on the knees of a lady At the end of Polygnotus- painting." among the great criminals, are four people who have mocked the Mysteries; a man a boy and two women : „i ^. m.. ^i^„,, ,,„p ,,, „j ,, ^^^l ri^ ■ri^ov. Just wherein consists the severity of such punish- ment it is hard to realize, unless on the one hand the actions may be highly symbolical, or on the other they may merely denote that endless and unremunerative labor, the doing of a simple thing that yet never is done, which was the Greek ideal of perfect unhappiness. Our painter seems to have been of that severe school who consider sins of omission as equally heinous with sins of commission ; for not far3 from the mockers are two women carrying water in broken pitchers, with an in- scr.pt.on above them stating that they are " not of the initi- ated," oi, fu^v^,,ivun,. Pindar < speaks of the fine rewards in Ely- sium which await those "purified." Kaufmann' thinks the Eleus.n.an influence was very wide and deep; and its effect on our three Tragedians he sums up thus : " The fundamental idea oi the Aeschylean works is that death is better than life • and in the seven surviving tragedies of Sophocles no less than six persons die voluntarily, although they hold only the first inti- mations of a better existence in a future life. And as far as Eurip.des m his poetic art departs from Aeschylus and bophocles, so near does he approach again when he speaks of death or hfe ; many remarks show life beautiful and agreeable, ' Come, PI. 30. 68. 83 ; Gerhard.- Ap. Vasenb., PI. ,6, ./ al. oft ^ Paus.y 10: 31: 9. * ^W. 01. o^.s., .. 1^4 £f. 5 ^au/mann, p. 3. H ^H iil 30 1 I i \ a DEA TH AND BURIAL IN A TTIC TRACED V [3O yet more make it a burden; and only in Euripides do we al- ways find verses which speak openly of a reward m the future Thl seems to be making too much out of too h tie. Wh ch six of Sophocles' characters he refers to >s not clear^ If the six suicides are intended: locaste. Deiane.ra and A.as had done deeds so horrible that they could dread nothmg worse than their present life ; Antigone preferred a qu.ck departu. to the slow agony of starvation, the most rational thing She could do, independently of any thought of a future hfe; and Haemon and his mother yielded weakly to affect.on. .mpelled by the unrelenting curse. If Oedipus and Herakles are m- ciuded. both were worn out with long suffering. ^^^^^JZ annihilation would have been welcome. In Eunp.des plays the AUestis is a glorification of life triumphant over death and in many of the others the heroes and heromes, w.th no loss Of their heroism, consider no deception too unworthy, no impiety too great, if they may thereby save the.r hves In Tschylus. a! far as his plays are left to us there .s not one suicide, no matter how great the evil or disgrace. On the ontrao^, Aeschylus teaches a noble and dignified res.gna .on to an inevitable evil ; Sophocles, that, since life conta ns o much of good, the after-life may not be so very bad. and should ZL with equanimity; and Euripides, with his greater^n- sitiveness to suffering and injustice, that since We here h- „uci. of pain and sorrow, and the gods ate just and gracious S^ere must be compensation somewhere, and the only possible pl^e is beyond the tomb. These differences are largely due to the differing temperaments of the poets, but at the same time their mental attitude was doubtless in great part the re- flection of progressive states of thought f--g »h; P^°^;^^,^ large due not to accident but to natural development. Kauf mann is ready to attribute all these better views of a future life to the Mysteries. But one must not be dogmatic. In any Le the J views had a tendency to overstep the formal and S^row limits of the Eleusinian teachings. We have seen that 31] VIE IVS REGARDING DEA TH , Aristophanes and Pindar held that future blessedness was C/ only for the initiated; the teaching of Musaeus and Orpheus, as currently received among the people, was to the same effect ; ' and Sophocles," according to Kaufmann, taught the same. But the Pseudo-Plato, whenever he lived, gave them only the front rank. And Euripides, who is frequently in ad- vance of his generation, would lead us to infer that goodness /^ without initiation is sufficient of itselD The tomb-inscriptions of the IVth century often follow the Euripidean tradition, as this * from Athens, 394 or 373 B. C: ek 'A.i6a Kare/Sa naaiv fiaKapiarog i6e(r&ac. There are others, however, more Eleusinian in tone, as the following,5 both from Athens, probably early in the IVth cen- tury : haria fiev kqI adpmg l^^i ^^(jv rralda rbv ^div^ and, acifia fiev kv kSXttoic KarSxei r6Se yaZa JlTidTuwoCj rlwxr) (T lao^iow rd^iv l^^t fiaKdpow. Speusippus considers « that rd^cv fmKdpuv is the same as xc>poc evcs^cr., m which, as we have seen, the Pseudo-Plato gives the Mystae the first rank, and the ^dXafim^ evaefiiuw is doubtless another ex- pression for the same idea.^ Thus then did death, viewed from the standpoint of natural impulse, of philosophy and of religion, appear to the baffled and sensitive minds of the Athenians ; the most uncertain of all certainties, for they fully realized that in the midst of life we are in death, and cord^vai ^ is a frequent term for " to live •" > P/a/o, Rep., ii, 364-5. ^Soph. fr., 753 ; Kaufmann, p. 4. M/r., 744-6: /r., 848; quoted below, chap. II, ad fin. * Kaibel, 26, 11. 8-9. * Kaibel, 90 ; Pregtr, 12. e Kaufmann, p. 21. ' Kaufmann, p. 2, quoted below, chap. II, ad Jin. ■ E. EL, 60 ; Hec, 73 ; Hel., 297, it al, oft. I il i 'I ! :\ I ,2 DEATH A JVn BURIAL IJ\7 ATTIC THAGBnV [^^2 coming no one knew whence, from god or fate or demon ; strik- ing no one knew whom, for '* somehow the treacherous and the wily the gods delight in rescuing from Hades, but the just and the upright they are ever dismissing ;'" leading no one knew whither, and in this lay its real horror ; for though fancy might indulge in pleasing dreams, though philosophy might argue for a life no worse than this, though religion might promise blessedness and contentment, the only certain verdict was that " after death there await men such things as they think not nor expect." ' 1 Phil., 448-50. > Heraclitus, fr. ,122. CHAPTER II CONDITION AND POWERS of the dead Thk Greeks do not seem to have formed a verj. definite co„cept.o„ of the difference between the state of life and that of death. Buchholz has worked Homer's notions out into an elaborate scheme. He says : « " The psychological principle- Th "!l IT'tv'^"^- "'"' fe-'-g-dwells in .„^ and \^, he breathable hfe-pr„ciple in the ^,, but the bod^-principL in H.l« r. Z ' """'"'' *' ^^' ^'^' t° the shades in cist '■ f}^^ ''^''!'^' °^ '^' '"-''■ '^^ '"'-^ -'J the ..., ceases and dies utterly, and thereby the man lose.s his con- scous personality, his proper e^o, his somato-psychic exist- ence ; for all on which the animal and spiritual (i^«i,/..) life u^ tmct and feehng, devoid of all affection, it continues a most m.serab e existence." The ^,,, then, by no means corre- Ponds to the modern idea of a soul, being far less comprehen- nirr Kk" ' u"^ '"'' '°''^'''"'' "'*'^°"' «"'-'*te speechfbut .ke g.bbenng bats3 or birds, and revived for a time oni; by ceedmgly gloomy, perhaps needlessly so. For, while his con- du.^ons can be supported by reference to particular passages. Homer takes no trouble to be consistent; and certainly the sp.nts mtervewed by Odysseus retained their memory and ^^'^^l^/iAoh: Die Homeriuk^ SeaU.„. m. b. 36; .« iir. b. ,-e^.. „. v 33] 33 i lii ■'i 34 DEATH AISTD BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY [34 interest in things terrestrial : the gloomy Achilles ' at last re- joices in the renown of his son; Elpenor and Teiresias' both recognize Odysseus without drinking of the blood ; and the wrathful Aias,3 mindful of his wrongs at Odysseus' hands, seeing him from afar, will not even approach the libations in the trench. The soul, shorn of so much of its former glory, would nat- urally be conceived of as diminutive in size ; and so it appears on the vases,* though it is never thus represented in either Homer or the Tragedians. That it could issue from a small opening is no proof in point, for spirits, in story at least, are very compressible, and the full-sized eUiS)^ of Iphthime passed easily through the keyhole.s Besides, the ghosts seen by Odysseus were probably of human proportions, for there is no Statement to the contrary. In a Vlth century vase-painting « at the British Museum, the soul of Patroclus is really gigantic. The -^xh in Homer issues from the mouth,^ leaving, doubtless, with the breath, though in the other cases » where the life is breathed out, it is ^vfxbg that is named, but probably interchangeably with fvxv- It could also depart through a wound.9 The Tragedians, maintaining the belief that the soul issues from the mouth, made no attempt at keep- ing fvxv separate from the other terms ; and we find the ex- pressions," ovTU Tcrv avrov ^vfiav bpvydvei ireauv, and, /?,w Unviov. In other cases, f»m is a mere concourse of activities which ceases with death." lOJ., II : 540. »0««.•«-.• Licy/Aes Blanks, pp. 75-9, pl- », " ; GfrAarJ.- AuserUstne Vasm. aider, pl. 198 (2), 199 (1); tt al., often, esp. on white lekythoi. ^Od., 4: 838-9. 'Go-hard: Austrl. Vasen., pl. 198 (l). V/., 9: 409- 'II., 13 : 654 ; 16 : 468 ; « <»/. *I': «4 = 5 'S-g- ^Ag., 1388. 1493. "'<''•. 3o« ; o^' '034- 35] COI^DITION^ AND POWERS OF THE DEAD While the Greeks, to form some idea of the soul, compared It to a dream.' to smoke,- to the shadow which th; sun caTts on thewall.aand finally adopted as their favorite term ti: word .^.^. or picture, ,s.^, it is .ikely that these tertLs osmg the,r first mtention of shadowiness and unreality came to denote something more distinct and substantial.4 It k true ' wTSut .^ °' '"' unsubstantiahty of a spirit asks'' W.It thou bury h.s „„, ? and Electra laments « that of Orestes she has „oth.„g left but „.„... . .„, ,„,, But we find Sophoc es on the other hand using the term as a mournful synonym for and. 6p& yap ^fiag ovSiv bvra^ hl%o ttI^ &vi»p&/,, Maedo, 70 ; //.. 2, • ,00.1 .„,/ ,„ ir D '/")•"•> *j • loo-i. 'ffictti, common. ^. /W.A .„ ^,«,, d.s I>,u. Mond», .895. 'ff„., ,240. .s, El W. ..5-6; ^.A. ..;>. 859. -C.^., 11: 34-^33. "Ud., 24: 6-9, 14, 9&-104. ^ 36 DEA TH AND B URIAL IN A TTIC TRA GED Y [36 III dream." ' These, it is to be noticed, were the souls, the fvxai, in Hades, whether of buried or of unburied bodies; for El- penor's plaint* does not accord with what we hear of the suitors.3 They were the actual spirits of the dead in their final home. Whether they strayed up to earth and appeared be- fore the waking eye, Homer does not tell US ; but the pxf) of Patroclus* visits Achilles in sleep and is something more than a mere dream. There was another sort of ghost, eidu?^, visible to the seer Theoclymenus, though not to the others,* EUGi7Myv 6e rrlkav npd^vpov, Tvleir] 61 koX avArj kfikvuw 'Epe^ooSe vnb l^6ov, apparitions of the living but foreteUing their death. There was still another sort, one fashioned by the gods to deceive people whether for good Of ill, but having no real connection with the person represented and no direct effect on his life ; as when Apollo, after carrying off Aeneas, made an eldu^.ov of him for the Greeks and Trojans to fight over f or when Athene made an dSuiov like Iphthime, which, having cheered Penelope in a dream, *' slipped away by the bolt of the door and passed into the breath of the wind," 7 an objective entity and not a mere subjective impression. In historical times this belief in ghosts and apparitions re- mained substantially the same, but became more definite and specific. The gods were stiU held to create ei6u?.a, entities wholly independent of the persons they resembled. Thus Clytaemnestra at one time denies that she killed Agamemnon, but says,^ " The ancient ruthless evil genius of Atreus . , . likened io the wife of this dead man hath visited him with vengeance." And not Helen, some supposed, but only an 1 Od., 1 1 : 204-23, 391-4. ' ^^^'^M 11:51-4. ' ^^'^-^ 24 : 99-104. * //., 23 : 65-107 ; frequent on the vases at the dragging of Hector. » Ot/., 20 : 355-6. « //., 5 : 449-53- ' Od., 4 : 795-841, Lan^, Leaf and Myers' transl. " Ag,y 1500-3. 37] CONDITION AND PO WERS OF THE DEAD image like her, was carried to Troy. This .u.^ of Helen^! interesting, not only for the large part it played in Greek literl ture, but because we have a more complete account of it thW any other. Helen herself speaking of it calls it -. I -. o«^ J 1 TT &"**'' ^^"S ^t etdwAw ^uTTvow sent wa- ^"^ '^^ cfreeks Cgh out their histoo^ beheved them to be at least possibly objective been only the common language of affection, Moreovef their appearance generally foretold misfortune, as when Darius ' i%/., 33-4. *^//., 705. 1219. V/JiV/., 119,36. '• I6id„ joy ff. »^/daimra, ^vT&ajiara of Achilles and of her son appear to Hekabe' as a premonition of evil. Clytaemnestra calls herself bvap, and it is possible she ghould be thought of as seen by the sleeping Furies alone, and as soon as they awake she vanishes/ Dream-phantoms are the only sort which Sophocles mentions, and that but once^ when he admits that Clytaemnestra « twice saw Agamemnon in a dream. The general belief in ghosts, however, was so strong that both Aeschylus and Euripides bring them on the stage. The calling up of Darius by means of libations, chanting and prayers to the x^^v^oi, is very dramatic ^ and unquestionably is meant to represent an actual materialization of his Spirit.7 But Cly- taemnestra.S ^s we have just said, is possibly merely a dream, visible to the audience for stage effect, and very probably is no more to be imagined as on the same plane of physical actuality with the other characters in the play than are the gods who stand in the midst of pedimental battles. lo speaks? of see- ing the ghost of Argus ; but though she refers to the shrill sound of the reed, it is not likely that the phantom was per- ceptible to any but herself, or that it was represented on the stage. Euripides is more bold and realistic in his treatment of stage ghosts. The dduTurv of Polydorus'** speaks a long pro- logue and very considerately moves away lest his mother be frightened at sight of him. The ghost of Achilles is freely talked of as appearing to the whole army;" and Admetus fears lest the restored Alcestis be some phantom from the i/Vr., 197-8, 518-9. » Sep., 710-1. * £um.y 116. « Jer., 619-22, 633-80, 686-8, 697, etc. 8 j5:«»*., 94-139. ^^Hec, 1-58. ^Hec, 69-77, 92-5, 702-9. i S. El, 417-23- T ibid.^ 681-842. * Pro., 567-71,574-5- "/<5j^., 37-4I» 108-15. 39] CONDITION AND POWERS OF THE DEAD dead,' ^„^ ^,prip^_ In 1;^^ nj^^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^^^^ .^ HeSe i" ^'^' ^""^ "^^"^'^"s that she is a phantom from Murderers cut off the extremities of their victims and wiped he blood on the.r heads to prevent their ghosts from a„„oyW then,; 3 though Sophocles merely says it was for purificatL! There would seem to have been reason for this practice, since we hear of ghosts evoked to declare their murderersV But P^to who tries to turn everything to moral account, says ghosts are the souls of those who have died not pure^Z «.^ap^f anoXv^uaac ; and as murderers for this reason are esoeci- t^:r ''-''' - ^-'^^ °^ »-- - ^eep ghosts' Homer mentions the ghosts of animals,. Orion hunting " the very beasts that himself had slain i„ the lonely hills;" but the Tragedians say nothing on this subject. Greek story and legend were full of ghosts. Pausanias mentions them many times and accounts fof them, if one Z soul. He tells how, up to his time, at Marathon they foueht seekers could never see them;" that a host of a6.Xa dwelt in the TemiJe of Is.s in Phocis, and so terrified an intruder thlt he died shortly after;" that the «v.Ao. of Actaeon at Orcho -nus . troubled the people until they performed proper buriai '/J-'"''- •^'•/•. 7^-3.569-70. Vol. vCIoff: ^^- ""'■•*■■ ^^- See also ^y^.^^. in ^„„,. ^«,.„.,,/ ^,,,<,/.. 5 *S. El.^ 445-6. Apul. Metam., 2: 35; Heliodor, EtA.,6: I4. See also Mnr- T ' 2; 1 : 900, etc. ^''•^- ^y^^5., 14; 2''.- ^--, 837 b; J^ar„eU.. Gr^.k Cults. 11. j.j ; H.I.. 569-70. ^^,n=„^5. .o/.«„.,4..3,,,. ../«^.,,:3.:4. t i \ \ 40 DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY [40 ii ^i II rites for him ; that the 6aiiu^ of one of Odysseus' sailors mur- dered at Rhegium annually insisted on having a girl sacrified to him, and ended his inhuman demands only after a wrestling match with a famous athlete in 468 B. C— but the hand of the priest is too evident in this last phenomenon. He tells also' of the occasional appearances of such heroes as Neopto- lemus, Echetlaeus, and others, at battles and elsewhere. He holds too that phantoms in dreams are real manifestations,3 as of Pindar, who appeared soon after his death to an old woman and dictated to her his last poem. From ghosts to a resurrection is a natural and easy step in belief To rise again was however a difficult matter in prac- tice, to be accomplished only by the direct intervention of the gods : ♦ «t yf }iil Tig "^eov avaerfjCEii viv* though their power to intervene was generally acknowledged.* Asklepios especially was the god who raised the dead ; but for this Zeus struck him with his thunderbolt, thus indicating that it was not a right thing for him to do.^ Henceforth only by trickery, as when Apollo cheated the Moirai ^ or Sisyphus the gods of the underworld;* or by superhuman force, as when Herakles wrestled with Thanatos for Alcestis;^ or by some great spell, such as the music with which Orpheus won back Eurydice,'** could the dead be brought to life again. To the Greeks of historic times the visible destruction of the body by fire or decay was a stumbling-block to belief in a res- urrection ; for though in Homeric days a goddess might pre- 1 Pans., 6:6: 7-10. «/W..,l:4:4; i : 32: S; 4J 42:4; ^^«^'/ ^^«'' ^^^'t 35? Thtmist.i^. * Paus.y 9 : 23 : 4 ; 4 : 13 ; 4 J 26 ; 7, 8 ; .(v„^,a«a.dvo^A^; and Iwanowitschs remarks that thev ?:afth::r T^^''^^^^^'"^''^'"- ^-^^^-'1 3 lear. though operating from different causes, both militated Strongly against these notions. Homer, is ^ot cleaTon this point and his statements are often contradictory bu^the Tragedians have much to say. though their expre s.ons Ire not always quite consistent. The ghost of D^^rino I perfectly all that happened up tote t mf 'h STtl b^ famous prophetic power seems to have been simply his recol- lection of the oracles he had heard before dy^ the m port of wh,ch he now by the light of current events bednsTo" ateT: , th^f- "'^^^ °' ^'^^--nestra,^ howevt, isTee„ y alive to al that is going on, her perceptive faculties having become only sharper through death ; and this seems to ace" rd with the general belief.. The dead, if they were not conscS^s r and p^°P'^.'^'='^^' *^"^ - that they received news through •n a distant land learning of things on earth by the arrival of new-comers, and criticising the actions of the Lng- T^ev were supposed to take pleasure i„ monuments erectfd inlheT honor, and by some considered their due,.^« and ifreturn the ' A/^., 463-4 ; i%/., 852-4. •^•^/..n59.n70; C,o.,si7; Tr..6o^,, a C. 955. ,,.,, „ft. I«>a„o^iisci. pp. 65-6; lU. of refs. for prayen unanswered. • Od.. ,0: 49,_5; „ passim,- ,t al. . p,,_^ ^,j_^g_ * ^w>w., 94-139. '-^«.. 54., 65-6; .S-. BL, 400; o. C, ,774_j; Or., 674-s. 'Hrtf ' ''"'°' " "'' °'- ''• ''^'■'^''-'' ^- ^^^S. passim. S.E,,,^_ '°^-.4..-3;^«-.,32<..;.., «^„...3e^. ""■' 3'9-«' ; UTaiM, 7, 2. 3. 4. ,0, ,/ al. i % %r ^ f I '. Ulii lit j BE A TH AND B URTAL IN A TTIC TRA GED Y [44 44 pious donors received benefits, as from the tombs of Oedipus at Athens and of Solon at Salamis.' But whether conscious of the present or not, they were gen- erally mindful of what had happened on earth;' and though sometimes ready to lend aid, as when Orestes and Oedipus promise to help the Athenians '—though Iwanowitsch * com- pares such aid to that from modern relics— or at least to give gift for gift,' as the gods did, yet they were most often thought of as ready for vengeance ; as when Herakles threatens Hyllus, if he does not fulfil his wishes,' el Sc fiij, fuvu a' iyt> Kal vip^ev ln> apaioc slffaei jiapvc and they were most often invoked to aid ^ in some vengeful scheme, as when Electra prays, Tolg (T havrtoLg Myo (JMVVvai aov, rrdrep, rifidopov. The dead had various ways of expressing their displeasure. The best known, of course, was by sending the Erinyes to .avenge murder, as in the Eumenides and the Orestes, But ^when these were not in order, they had other means, such as secretly shedding the blood of their victim,^ or causing open disaster, as did the drowned Myrtilus,9 or by arousing frenzy and vague fears at night - But their special method of annoy- V ance was by the sending of bad dreams : " ropbq yap bp^S^pi^ 6(3oc 66fiuv bveipSfiavTig, k^ vnvov kStov ^Jebb : Oed. Col. p. xxx. « S, El, 482-4. ^t al, oft. • Euni., 767-74. 598 ; o. 6'., 4", 1520-5 ; ^^^-^ 1030-6. * I-oanoivitsck, p. 51. * Cho., 93-5*. '^ O,^' « Track., I20I-2 ; Ag., 345-7 ; Cho., 324-6 ; Eum., 768-71 J ^. -£/-, 495-8; et aly oft. T Cko., 142-3 ; E, El, 677-84 ; E, Sup., 1 143-5 ; '^ ^^' 8 S. El, 1419-23. • S. El, 508-15 ; Ag., 345-7. w Cho., 286-8, 293-4. " Cho., 32-41, 523-50 ; ^' El. 459-60. 45 45 J CONDITION AND POWERS OF THE DEAD nviuv, aup6wKTov afi^dafia fivx6-&ev eXoKE nepl ^6/3(f), r^acKslomv h doifiamv ^apk mrvuv. Kptrac re THivS" bveipdrcjv ■&e6^ev IXaKov vniyyvoc filfiea^ai rove yac vkp^ev nepi^i,,^^ rolg KTavovai f eyKoretv. Indeed dreams, whether good or bad, as well as their fulfilment, were under the control of he dead and to the dead prayers concerning them were made ■ Th° was part of their general gift of prophecy»wh"ch they lav have acqmred from their close ccn'ectfon with elZ elltf Hor: r "? *^^ ^y'""?.^ like Cassandra and 'sev^ ExcentT 1 °"' *'"'' "y anticipation the same gifl. the hetftTde r "T "^""^ ^^ P-phecy and vengeance, TJ A ,t, r ' ^' ^^' ^' ^^^'^^^^' ^"d occupation went rchille?6 1""'''m" °' ''' '°"" ^'''^ '■" ^he same play Ach^lles.« the noblest of the living, is still the noblest of S 'A;fMA*of, 6f fiera ^6vto)v or' tjv sies on fi,» K / rJ^ '" ''"^""- Cassandra prophe- sies on the banks of Cocytus and Acheron.^ Enmity did not Per., 219-43 ; Paus., 4 : 26 : 8. ^Rohdi: Psyche, pp. i9g_9^ ^^^^ ' Eum.. 2. 4 ^ Anst Fro,s, 8a. . p,,,, .3.^3 . o.., „ : 484-6. ^ £1, 837-4,; p,r., 69, ; CHo., 35^60; Od.. „ : 56(^-71. Hec, 547-52. •^.T.. i.ec^l ; Od, ., : 90-6; see also Ag., ,528 ; Od, „ .. 57^.5. \ m 46 DEA TH AND BURIAL IN A TTIC TRA GED Y [46 I ■' ill! cease with life, though Antigone argues that it should^ Even bodily defects were retained, especially the wounds which had caused death, so these were carefully closed and bound w up •/ and for a like reason Oedipus blinds himself 3 that he may not see his murdered father in Hades : ky(b yap ovk olfT bfifiaoiv iroioic pJiruv Tzarepa ttot' av TrpoaeUov elq "kidov fio7.bv ovS" av Tdlaivaif firirtp\ olv kfiol dvolv ipY earl Kpeiaaov' dyx^vr/^ elpyaafiha. Of course it was but natural that friends should meet again, and such scenes may be depicted on the tombstones,^ but we are not certain. Philoctetes s speaks of going to search for his father in Hades; Aias' last words ^ are that he will tell his griefs to those Kdru- Creon 7 bids Antigone, KaTD vvv hWov(f, tL (julirriov^ (jti'^t and she expresses a hope of meeting her parents and brother there « Admetus 9 even bids Alcestis prepare a home for him against his coming. But of all the pictures of meeting in the lower world, that one, though intended to be taken ironically, of the little Iphigeneia running to meet her father '° is by far the most gracious : dAA' 'liftiyiveid viv daizaaiui ■&vydT7jp, (I)C XP^i irarkp' dvridaaaa Trpbg cjKhiropov Trdp'&fievju.' dxi<^ TTspl X^^P^ (3alovaa (^Lkijaei. In early times, when retribution followed swift on wrong- 1 Ant.. 5 14-24. ' ^- ^'^ ' "7-8 \"ol-> °ft- s 0. T., 1371^ ; Eum., 103. « Come: Att. Grab., PI., 4^5'' " "'■ s I%il., I2I0-I. • '^'•> 8^5- '^«A. 524-5. • /W.. 897-901. » Ale, 363-4; see Htl., 836-7 ; E. £/., "44-6 ; Tro., 1234. ^"Ag., 1555-9. W 47] (CONDITION AND POWERS OF THE DEAD doing, When man took summary vengeance and the gods were supposed to do the same, there was little need of felegatine punishment to the future life. The mere necessity of dyini was a sufficient punishment in itself,- and so became a purify .ng agency to the soul. I„ Homer, severity was visited only on special offenders against the gods, like Tityus and Tantalus and Sisyphus,' and not on merely moral delinquents; with the exception however of perjurers, whom Zeus and the other gods punished in the underworld : 3 ^ 01 imtvep&t Ka/i6vTa( dv^pi,wm^ Tivw^cw oTii K- iniopm bfidaari As civilization and especially philosophy advanced, the pun- ishment of evil-doers receded more and more into the future life so that Pausanias^ remarks that in his age "on the wicked the wrath of the gods falls late and on those who have departed hence." The Tragedians were beginning to realize hat not only many wrong acts besides perjury escaped detec- tion on earth, but that there were crimes for which no earthly / puni^ment, not even death, was sufficient, such as the murder of a near relative or a suppliant. The King of Argos says to the suppliant daughters of Danaus : 5 eK66in-ec v/udc rbv 'tTav61e-&pov ■&ebv (iapvv ^vvoiKov ^Tjadjuea^' dUcropa, dg M kv "AlSov rhv ^ai^dvr' klev^epoi. Electra not Very graciously tells her mother,^ KttKug 6?MU), fiTjdk & EK y6(jv TTori Tuv vvv dixakM^ELav 01 Kara ^eoL And the Erinyes assure Apollo concerning Orestes/ v-n-S re yav vy(bv oh ttot' eXev^epovvrac TTOTirpdnauig wv rf* erepov kv Kdpg, . fiidoTop' elaiv ov TcdaeraL. I See p. 18, n. 5. for refs. . Od., 1 1 : 576-625. ' ^., 3 ; 278-9; 19 : 259-60. Iwanowitsch denies this and emends these lines S. El., 291-2 ; Eum., 95-6. t Eum., 175-7, 340. ^iv r. 1 ■ i llii I %M .48 DEA TH AND £ URIA L IN A TTIC TRA GED Y [48 On the other hand, special favorites of the gods, like Herakles or Helen, were taken to heaven or some other bliss- ^ ful abode,^ though many of them were by no means exem- plary characters. Moral heroism, the passive heroism of suffering, seems to have had its first really great representa- tive in the Alcestis of Euripides ; and her reward is simply to be brought back to earth. The Greeks of the Vth century had not succeeded in draw- ing a very distinct line between the good and the bad, especi- / ally with reference to retribution in the life to come. As late as Euripides it was possible to say,* Tobq eiryevelg yap ov arvyovai daifwveg, rCrv (T dvapc-&fjt^(Jv fiaT^kdv tlai ol ndvoty the *• nobles" in contrast to the ''herd" being favored even in the other world. But the active and aggressive minds of the Greeks were not content with being wholly the playthings of fate. That there must be some means of influencing the future and unseen world by the present and visible, was felt in very early times. In Homer's day this influence seemed to be ex- erted by the dead body over the departed soul, and proper burial rites insured a happy passage to the land of shades, \/ while their neglect condemned the soul to perpetual wandering.3 How deeply this feeling— for in historical times it could have been nothing more— was engrafted in the very fibreof the Greek soul, is seen in the insistence on at least a formal burial, such as that for which Antigone was ready to sacrifice her life ; * in the laws lasting into late times concerning the burial of strangers washed up by the sea or otherwise found ;s and in the much-practiced custom of adoption ^ by which a man secured proper burial and the subsequent offerings and atten- tions at his tomb. This idea must have entered the Hellenic ^ See p. 41, n. 8, for rcfs. *Sep., 1026-41; et al. ^Gardner and Jevons, p. 550. ^Hel.y 1678-9. *Od, 11:51-6. ^Paus., 2 : 1 : 3; 10 : 5 : 4 ; ^/ «/. 49] CONDITION AND POWERS OF THE DEAD 49 mind while it was still in an early and formative stage But as the Greeks grew more spiritual in their ideas, and recog- nized the soul as not the possession but the master of the body, they perceived that some action by the soul itself before death was necessary to insure future happiness. This gave rise to the Mysteries and to much of the teaching of the early philosophers, to say nothing of the strolling priests whom Plato' criticises as "persuading not only private persons but even cities that forsooth there are purifications and cleansings from unrighteousness through sacrifices and childish pleasures, not only for the living but even for the dead, which they call the Mysteries" of Musaeus and Orpheus, "which will release us from evils there; but for those who do not sacrifice terrible things are waiting." At Athens these sacrifices and purifica- tions took a definite and regulated form in the Eleusinian Mysteries, of whose great influence we have spoken above » and initiation into them, which was in general open to all was considered the key to future blessedness.3 Plato again criti- cises this point of view, i^^^^ ^l Uy.ra^<^r^a r^ ^^^^iv.v. ^c hlr^^ rov Mcnov xp6vov fierd to ^e(Jv didycma, SC. ^x^. Sophocles says : « 6>f rpig 67i/3ioi KElvoL jipoTuv 01 TavTa Sepx-^kvTe^ reXn fi6?iova' eg "AiSov rolq 6k yap fidvoig hel Cvv icTi, Toic aXXoiai Trdvr' f/cel KUKa. Kaufmann claims this as Sophocles' general belief, but Iwano- witsch says Sophocles recognizes neither reward nor punish- ment in the future world, and that this, therefore, is only a tribute to the Eleusianians.^ Kaufmann is probably right for not only was this the belief of Aristophanes, Pindar, and Others, with whom Sophocles is classed, but the expressions ^» ^^ato : Rep, ii, 364-5. 2 See p. 28. » Phaedo, 81 a. *See Hym. Ham., 5 : 480-2; Pind, fr. 137 /?; inscr. quoted by Kaufmann, 2, ^Soph.^fr, 753. ^Iwanowitsch, pp. 5 1, 53. \\ \ II ' I 1 1! ; 1 '!!! Hi ti >< CO ^£^ TH AND BURIAL IN A TTIC TRA GED V [50 about the " great aether," quoted above/ seem to indicate two contrasting places whither the soul of man may go j and it seems probable that the division was made along the line of those depx^evreg te?.v, that is, the initiated. Polygnotus' painting » is, as it were, bounded by Eleusinianism, for while friends are enjoying each other's society and men and women are carry- ing on their ordinary avocations or rehearsing some notable event of their lives, at one end a lady who had introduced the Mysteries into one of the islands is receiving honor therefor, and at the other those who had mocked the Mysteries are being punished. We learn, then, from the Tragedians of only three classes of sinners who receive punishment in the future world ; the un- initiated, particular offenders against the gods, and murderers, ^ with the last of whom traitors were probably classed, for their bodies received the same punishment of being cast out un- buried.3 With Socrates and Euripides came definiteness in the new doctrine, that goodness of itself, purity of the soul, inde- V pendent of external forms, was the only true path to eternal happiness. om Iotlv dvdpl d-ya^o) kukov ovdkv ovte ^(ovtc ovte reT^vrijaavTi^ are Socrates' words;* and Euripides, though narrowing the application a little, almost echoes them : * bariq 6e rot)c TEKdvrag kv (iio) ak^si hS' earl koX Cwv Kai ■&avd)v i^eoZf 0fXof. It is true that Plato in another place, putting into the mouth of Socrates a very similar sentiment, adds, Qomp ye Kai naat UyeraL^ but there is little of it known to us in the earlier lit- erature. Euripides 7 has not a great deal to say on this sub- ject, but what he says is very plain : 1 See p. 27. ^P^^^' 10:28-31. 8 O. C, 406-7 ; PL Laws, 838 b; Sep., 1013-24; et al. ♦ PL ApoL, 41 c ; €t al., oft. * £- A 848, //• 1-2. • Fl. Phaedo, 63 c. See Geddes-, Phaedo of Plato (1885), note on this pas- sage. ' Ale, 744-6. See Iwanowitsch, p. 72, n., for Euripides as an Orphic. 51] CONDITION AND POWERS OF THE DEAD 51 t\ 6e n mm TrXiov ear' dja^oig, tovtuv fiere^ova' "Aidov vvfj.6vt/g ndaiv exeig ^dXafiov, oojfia fiEv hM6e aov, Aiovvaie, yala aalvizTEL irVXVV Ss aHvarov koivoc ^xei ra/xiag. The Tragedians do not commit themselves definitely. The best that Aeschylus ♦ can say is : TEKvov, ^pdvTjfia Tov ^avovTog ov 6a/id- Cei nvpog fia^Epd yvd-&og, aivEi & vGTEpov opydg' and Euripides' speculations is only more vague: 6 vovg rwv Kar^avdvTuv f// nh ov, yvmrjv (T ix^i d^dvarov eig d^dvarov al-&ep' euneacjv and elsewhere ^ he says : 6 vovg yap ^fiuv iariv h EK&arLi ■&e6c' while Sophocles 7 rather questions the whole matter : ' ^' ^'* 613. 8 ATatM, 26. ' ^«'"-» 2784, //. 5-7- See Kaufmann, p. 2, for further references. * Cho., 323-6. ^Hel., 1014-6. ^E.fr. 1007. '^. C 998-9. i ( 1 w 11 'I III i ' ' 52 DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY olf eyiii ovSe rrjv Trarpbc tfwxvv av olfiai Cotaav avrenzeiv kxtLV [52 though we have seen that he speaks of the reward of the ini- tiated as ;fjv. Pericles gives a hint in the same direction in his famous funeral oration." Plato, as we may infer from pass- ages quoted above and many others, apparently believes in immortality, but the arguments he brings forward to prove it ^ are by no means convincing, and Cicero in the Somnium Scipionis, takes him to mean only a limited and by no means endless duration. Indeed, immortality is quite beyond the grasp of finite minds, and the immortality of the soul is by no means susceptible of proof; but a belief in the soul's immor- tality is not thereby precluded. ^Plut. Peric, 8. CHAPTER III THE OTHER WORLD AND THOSE WHO DWELT THERE Since it was felt that the dead were in existence some- where, we are prepared to find much speculation as to their abode and companions. But first a word should be said touching the journey of the soul. The journey of the body ' to its last resting-place may have affected the phraseology; but death as a journey is too trite and too natural a figure to need justification or illustra- tion.' It has been claimed 3 that the position of the body dur- ing the prothesis, with its feet toward the door, was typical of *^ this journey. When we remember that what testimony we have from the monuments 4 goes to show that in the proces- sion the body was carried head foremost, this position at the prothesis would be full of significance, did we not reflect that whatever fancies may have grown up later, both these posi-' tions were the most natural and convenient for the purpose in hand. In Homer the journey is but a crude instinct. The souls, gibbering like bats, somehow flutter away to Erebus 5 Later, the likeness to birds becomes more apparent, assisted U perhaps by such myths as that of Philomela, or the tradition of the Memnonides.^ On a Sicilian vase in the British Mu- seum,7 above the head of Procris, who is just slain by Cephalus, ' ^^^.» 609-10 ; et al « Ale, 262-3 ; ei al oft. ^Blumner: Leben u. Sitten, II, 76. ^Baumeister, III, p. 1943; I, p. 727 ; Gardner and Jevons, p. 363. *0^.,24: 1-14. «/'^«J., 10:31:6. ''Millingen : Ined Mon., Ser. /, />/., 14. if 111 54 DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY [54 flies a bird with a human head. Some such idea may have been in the mind of Theseus when he says ' of his unhappy wife: ■k7]6tjii' eg "Aidov Kpanrvov opfiijaaad fioi. On the vases,* especially the Attic white lekythoi, above the dead person or his stele frequently flies one or more little black-winged creatures, generally held to be the soul of the 1^ departed ; while on a vase from Pikrodaphni, inside the mound of a tomb four of these tiny beings are fluttering about.3 On a black-figured amphora ^ of the Vlth century in the British Museum, flying over a ship is the ghost of Patroclus furnished with large wings like those of an eagle. A bird is also some- times oflered s at a tomb or flies ^ over it. This little soul, curiously enough, becomes confused with the child Eros,7 and may be the prototype of the Nike- Eros « which appears on late hero-chapel and Persephone vases. The interesting question arises whether the dual meaning of the word v^^a:^, soul and butterfly, had anything to do with the attribution of wings to the soul ; but ^wx^ meaning butterfly is not found in early writers, and may be a late development ; and Passow tells us that its accent was possibly ■^ixn,'^ while Furt- ^Hip., 828-9; Or., 674-6; E. Sup., 1142; O. 7!, 175-8; Ion, 796. spottier: L. B., PL 4; Rayet et Collignon, pp. 233, 235 (figs. 86, 87); Roh. inson : Cat. Gk. Vases, p. 165 ; Roscher : Lextkon, II, US©; ei al » A then. Mitth., 16, p. 379. * Gerhard: Auserl. Vasen., PI. 198 (l). 6 Pettier. ' L. B., PL 4, p. 146 (no. 49) ; Cat. Vases in Br. Mus., Ill, D 69; IV, F 336. » Hamilton Collection, III, 30 ; Cat. Vases in Br. Mus., IV, F 333. ' Pottier : Z. B., PI. 2; Roscher, II, p. 1151 (fig). 8 Genick: Gr. Keratnik, PL 7 ; Milling en : I, M., I, /»/. 16; et aL 9 Passow: Worterbuch der gr. Sprache (1857), s. v. i/n>;t^, 3 and 5 ; see also Liddell and ScoH, S. V. t^vxh- 55] THE OTHER WORLD 55 wangler says that the earliest known representations of Psyche that ,s m the Second and First centuries B. C, show h^; with the wmgs of a bird and not those of a butterfly. On the other hand, on a white lekythos in the British Museum^ from Eretna, 420 B C, a youth is offering in a net something Zt closely resembles a butterfly. And in a grave of Mycenae there was found a miniature pair of scales of gold leaf, on one of which was stamped the figure of a butterfly 3 But travelling with wings was not realistic enough for the popular mmd- and just as the shadows of early demon! worship faded, and the other world approxin^ated in fts fancied appearance to this, so the modes of reaching it became m7re hke the earthly methods of travel. In HoL, notXlT Sv^r T^ "^7^" '""''-^ ^"^ '' '''' -cntionef rthe ct if and 7a ."^"'' ""^^^ ""^^'^^^^^ ^"^^"^ the lower classes and worked ,ts way up into literature • for though firmty established in the Vlth centu^^,^ neither A^lZsnor Sophocles makes any clear allusion to it wotTal'^dTn^'^"^^'^"'' "' ^^.Wd.... the fer^^ of by a 'chts of sS^^^^^^ ''''''-' ''''-''- ^ -' ^-t -^-^^ kalev6l''Axhovr^;iel0eTac rav vaiaroAov fieMyKpoKov ^eopiSa, Tdv aoTi(Brf '7r62,7u^i^ rav dvdTuov, rrdvSoKov elg a ■ . ' isountas and Manatt d ioc •Souk without winps- M«n r.,.j ti n """> P- '^S- If'/,^"'' '■ "■ ^'"""'»' »'S>'i>-.g from Paus. lo : 28: 2. ^ ■«>«.«-.• Z.i?., p. 44, ^,„fs. 4?.. .558 ; .r««l. .. ford " by Vcrratl. • Sip., 856-60. eg DEA TH AND BURIAL IN A TTIC TRA GED V [55 On the Dipylon monumental vases often appears a ship,' which is variously interpreted, but which, together with the tombstone relief of the warrior Democlides," may well have had some reference to this ^eupk of souls, and this sacred ves- sel in its turn to that other which in legendary times carried the sorrowful Cretan sacrifice, and during whose annual ab- sence no condemned soul might be sent forth from earth.3 In Euripides we hear not only of the voyage,* but of Charon himself with his boat,s which is always a rowboat, rdv & dvdaTi/jxrv riicvcjv Xdpuvog lirtfiivei iz^Ara. Though the boat is often called two-oared,^ on the vases the ferryman stands holding but one oar,^ or rather pole, Kovr<5f,* much as the ferryman of to-day does on the shallow English rivers. In the Alcestis 9 he is a rude, impatient fellow, appear- ing before the eyes of the dying lady, with Thanatos instead of with his usual companion Hermes, and calling to her to hasten. The obolos for his vavkov '° is not mentioned by any of the Tragedians, and by the testimony of the cemeteries " was of very rare occurrence in early and classical Attica. But since for the living the most natural mode of travel was by land, on foot or horseback, in this way too the dead were generally pictured as journeying to their distant home ; and Hermes," Kfi^v^ liiyiare rwv dvu re /cat Karcj^ * Brueckner und Pernice^ pp. I52-3. * Conze^ PI. 122. » PI. Phaedo, 58 a, b. *Z A.^ 667-9; H. M., 427. ^ H. M.^ 431-2- ^Alc, 252, 444 ; Paus., 10 : 28: I. ^ Alc.^ 361 ; Dumont et Chaplain : Or.y I, 11. 34 ; Baumeistir^ I, p. 378 \ Gardner: Sc. Tombs He I., p. 31 ; Pottier : L, B., PI. 3; Lecuyer : Terres Cuites Ant., I, PL T2. » Ale, 254 ; et al. » Ale, 252-6. ^^ Lucian : De Luctu, 9. " Brueckner u. Pernice, pp. 1 87-8. *' Cho.f 165 (placed after 123 in IVeiPs text). THE OTHER WORLD 57] was both protector of travellers and guide of departing souls ' H.searhest office in this latter connection, was that of Ser .litTJ '°t '" "°'""" ^'"" ' '""^ >^^t libations bSe rsi:;si:s;:^°"'^^^ onhi. Aiascansato .„n hi. t: kjoKu S" dua nofiTcalov ^^pfifp, xUv'lov ei fie Koifiiaar and probably the line/ <^^ TOl KlKlfjOKQ Tbv aUwTTVOV is addressed to him, if aU^^s rather than „;,„._« be the correct reading. In the late twenty-fourth book' of the Ojlyssey, when Sleep and Death have 'become re::gni/ed a bro hers, Hermes uses his sleep-inducing wand to lead the Tewr *'' ^"'f - ^Hades . and becomes their gu!de and comes ;r;J\ T-P'""'' ^^ ^"'■^^' """^^^ -«, he comes w th Persephone to lead away the soul,' or with Hades receives .t ; O a„d to meet Hermes is to die, as was said of the slain Nisus- It is he who with the other chthoman gods brings or sends up the shades" and with them or m the.r stead helps to vengeance for murder " Ihe question arises whether the Chthonian Hermes is "s, but m the Tragedians, the evidence seems to be that he is - see -~.., pp. 99-100. for epithets of Hermes in the T^^edians. >T'I ' '* ' "^5 ' '*' ""'"""'• "I- ^' ^93 and refe. ■^t.f 031—2. . _ 8 zr ' ^' ^'* ^578; see below. ff«^a„„ (,827), MUcA,ll (,S^), Wunder (,832), rf al. edJr^' (18..), aHH, (.8.3). Sc^„.i^ (.8.6). i./„^^„ (.859), and n.ost 'Od y ,.,0; see C. Perrot: S,l. d. la Mori, p. ,08, n. O. C, i547_8. ,^ " i-to., 622. 11 ^, , _ „^^ "at;., 124.6; Per., 620. cho., i_2, 727 J s, ^/., ,10-8; Cho,, 124-7. m 58 DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGED\ [58 not. In the latter, Hermes, son of Maia, is once invoked,^ not however as x^^^oq or 'Koin^bq, but for the quite earthly pro- tection of Orestes in his wily scheme of vengeance ; while the Hermes of the dead is almost always designated by one of these epithets.' Plato 3 makes Socrates, when about to die, speak of going Trapa ^^ubq hX-kfvqy as if a different set of gods existed in the other world ; and furthermore, on a red-figured stamnos* in the Vatican we find both forms of HermeS together, the Olympian and the Chthonian, engaged in conversation. In view of this, the Yaq 'Koi KoL Tapr&pov^ may very well be the god whose function is to fly forever between earth and Hades ; he it is who, as the Argus-slayer, could most readily still the fierce Cerberus, and as god of sleep could give eternal sleep ; and lastly, since Hermes tto/zttoc and /} veprkpa ^edg are supposed to be standing close at hand (1. 1 548), and the prayer begins to the latter (1. 1556), not only would the final invocation to Hermes complete the chiastic arrangement so dear to the Greek heart, but there would, on the other hand, be something very strange, after calling upon all the chief x^6vioi, in omitting Hermes, one of the most important, and one who, besides, is supposed to be present. That the lines could not be addressed to Thanatos*^ is clear from the fact that he has a different genealogy, that he is never called upon in the Tragedians to give sleep, that he apparently never himself descends into Hades and therefore would have nothing to do with the dog, and that the miracu- lous departure of Oedipus would make a prayer to Thanatos singularly inappropriate. On the sepulchral reliefs 7 and vases,^ the dead man is often » S. El, 1395-7. *See refe. above. » PI Phoido, 63b. * Gerhard: Auserl. Vasen., PI. 240 (i) ; see (2) also. 6 O, C-., 1574-8- •The Scholiasts are divided as to who is meant; see MitcheWs Sophocles (1844), note to 11. 1574, 1578. For Thanatos see below, p. 65 If. 1 Come, ri. 90, 92 (no. 380), 131 (no. 682), et al. « FasseHi, II, 182 ; Hamilton Col., II, 15 ; III, 33 ; *' ^^• 59] ^^^ OTHER WOKLD 59 represented in the hat and cloak of a traveller, sometimes with ^ the addition of spear and shield,' and occasionally accompanied by his htde slave to carry them, a motif that clearly points to the journey of death with its attendant dangers. Beside the youth often stands his horse,' which further emphasizes the journey he ,s to take, and is, like the traveller's hat and cloak ma measure a symbol of death. The horse in its chthonian relations played a large part on the tombstone reliefs of the Spartans; 3 and a favorite Homeric - epithet for Hades was ^6..^, Hades of the goodly steeds, probably with reference to the rape of Persephone. Demeter, too, in her Eleusinian, that IS, her chthonian character, in Arcadia is closely con- nected with horses.s Pausanias^ gives the legendao^ account of the burial of two horses with Marmax; and Euripides ^ speaks of the sacrifice of a horse at the tomb as an Egyptian custom. We remember the horses slain at the p^re of Patroclus;3 and the bones of horses have been found in early graves.. All of which shows that the horse was the animal ^ s r dLT '"'■^ *' "■^"*- ™" '"'"'>' «>"-'«' There is one whole series of monuments" of a little later date, m which horses play a conspicuous part, the lar^e funeral vases of the IVth century adorned with the so-callfd marriage scenes, in which the bride and groom are tj^pified by by Persephone and Hades. It is more likely however that ' ^<^««^ PI' 49. ^% (no. 366), 93. 147 (no. 627), ./ al. 26^7Zf'""'' '''' "'' ^^"''^^'^ ^'''•'"'^^^ ^---^ "' '90; III, » Furtw&ngler, in Athen. Mitth., 1882. *//., 5 : 654, et al; see Autenrieth's Homeric Dictionary, s. v. • Pans., 8 : 25 : 4, 7-10 ; 8 : 42. • Paus., 6 : 21 : 7. "^ Hel., i2c8. 8 T7 ' ^ •-^-^.»23: 171-2. Tsounias and Manatt, p. 152, et al. '" The « Apulian Vases " of the IVth century. 6o ^^A TH AND B URJAL IN A TTIC TRA GED Y [6o the carrying away of the soul by death is intended. For some reason, perhaps because of the migration from one home to another implied in both, perhaps because of the con- trast between the marriage festivity and the funeral mournful- ness, perhaps because of some forgotten mysticism reaching back into barbaric times, the Greeks were fond of coupling marriage and death together. To give avrl yanoio rd(j)av is a favorite threat in the Odyssey;^ and Diomedes' taunt to the amorous Paris » that he should have " more birds than women around him," and the sad remarks concerning the slain, that " they were lying upon the earth much dearer to vultures than to their wives," both point by irony to death as a sort of marriage. In Dipylon times we find the loutrophoros — an amphora with a long neck and tall handles especially conse- crated to carrying water for the bridal bath— appearing in great numbers upon tombs, and having always a marriage or a funeral scene painted upon it.-* A funeral scene on a mar- riage vessel would have been of evil omen ; « consequently vases thus adorned must have been intentionally prepared for the tomb, and the presumption is strong that those with wedding scenes were made for the same purpose. And since these are the only two sorts of scenes hitherto discovered, it naturally follows that wedding scenes must have been considered pecu- liarly appropriate as a variant for funeral scenes, and therefore full of meaning. Loutrophoroi on tombs were common at all periods in Athens;^ and in Demosthenes' time had apparently become the sign that the deceased was unmarried.^ That this however could not always have been its general signification on Athenian tombs, we must conclude from the inscriptions ^ 1 O^., 20 : 307 ; gf al. * //., " : 395- s //.^ 1 1 : 161-2. * Collignon^ in Amer. Jour. ArcA.^Xy p. 407. 6 See above, p. 22. • Brueckncr u. Pernice, pp. 145-6. » Demos.y 1086, 18; if the reading and our understanding of it be correct. •C. /. ^., II, 3» 1731- 61] TI/B OTHER WORLD ^ and reliefs on the tombstones themselves. For instance one stele' shows a loutrophoros between two sphinxes, and above a relief representing two men, both named, apparently father and son. On another, a stone loutrophoros,' we find in the relief three men, one of them quite old, and a woman all named, apparently a family group. On still another,3 there is an elderly man clasping the hand of a young lady; the differ- ence in their ages makes the relationship of brother and sister unhkely; the lady must be either the wife or the daughter of the man. On another stele 4 we find what is certainly a family group: a lady sitting with her child beside her clasping the hand of her husband who is dressed for a journey while behind him stands his old father; below is a Siren beating her head, while at the bottom is a loutrophoros whose lip and handles were probably painted. All of these and many similar ones are from the Vth and IVth centuries at Athens In the Tragedians the connecting of marriage and death becomes veiy marked. Not only is the dwelling of the dead frequently referred to as ^d^^or, " bridal chamber," or ;..^dc which IS almost invariably the women's apartments, but Antigone calls her tomb,5 6 w^^eiov, " bridal chamber," and says she will be married to Acheron^ (here standing for Hades) ^Axipskiv TLvi But to whom did he refer as rcvi ? Certainly not to his son, though we might infer that the latter was the groom from the messenger's words s a little later, when he nnds him dead beside Antigone, rd WjLupiKo, rklTi "hixlav 6eDmloq elv "Aidov 66/iotg. 1 Conze, PI, 214 (no. 1074). ' <^^«w, PI, 56 (no. 208). ^Ant,, 891. M«/., 654; ffec.,612. * Contt, Pi. 130 (no. 728). *Cm^, /y. 94(no. 383). M«/., 816; /. A., 1399. ^Ant., 1240-I ; Tro., 445; Med., 985. 62 DBATU ANV ttVKiAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY [62 Hi The bridegroom was Hiidcs : Agamemnon xayi' of his daughter; and Uter* he exclaims, w^ffrrr^^vtt bcing thc technical term for giving in marriage and $0 employed by Polyxene.J 'Jah w/Mmdt'^ kfth 6i^, Such expres- siort-s were used not merely of maidens but of married women as well; *AUvr ptpf^fT nrxrxfdv^, sdys Pyladei* of Helen; and they were used even of men, for Megara, after naming the brides she would have chosen for her sons, continues: ifioi ^ 46k(i%iq XBVTf>6' dtcrpioc ^po^. I Iccatc, as was filling at the soul-marriage, carried the torch ; says Cassandra.^ The myrtle, too, which was especially sacred to Aphrodite, belonged equally to death, and was laid 00 graves ; ' and Aphrodite herself had a close connection with tombs and the underworld.* The later epigrams m the An- thalifgy^ have much that is pathetic to say about the bride of HadcJi ; but wc have an early Attic inscription,'® one from the Vltli century, tK;»t is instructive : iyrl yifu^ itafA 4tAi¥ f»&f» A^JTOli^ 4m|^ She was to be called Kore forever. Now Korc, the Maid, wa$ »///r.. 36S. »//. if.,48o-4i Ant,, 1204-5. •^^mrmrit^ II, p. 652; r«A. on p(K 754, 653, ^99. ♦ ^lattm* Amlh^g:); Bk. VII, B^ 13, iSa, // a/. • ^Tr^., 32J-4. ^JCaiM.^ 63] ^-^-^ Oyy/iSfA- WORLD gj the £avorite name for the mystic bride of Hades, oft-received, snatched away unwilling from the bright earth to his gloomy abode. We are hardly going too fer when we *ec in Kore the type, the mystic representation of every departed .soul. If this be so, at once the connection between marriage and death be- comes clear and fitting, and the loutrophoros with its wedding scenes finds its mast cnduringly appropriate place upon tlie tomb. The magnificent Apulian vases* mentioned abov^ probably served the same purpose and were manufactured with Uiis end in view. They are large and heavy amphorae with a weaitJi of adornment ; and tJiough they present a great variety of .Mibjectj, it is likely that all refer more or les» directly to death. Many represent the ** deified dead " stand- ing or sitting inside a small heroon,* ^mctimes with the at- tribute or name of i?omc hero attiicKcd. while. outi»klc. friends are bringing offerings of all sorts. Other* repr^wjnt daily occupations, a w^^ frequent on tombstone reliefs and the white lekythoi. But many are of the so-called marriage scenes.J The general scheme is the four-horse chariot \\\ which stands I fades with one arm around Persephone, who turns to bid tirewdl to her mother; Hermes and, frequently, Dionysus ac- company the chariot, and Hecate awaits it witli torches. Sometimes Nike-Eros flics above. Tlicsc, as we have seen, all c>ccc|>t possibly the last, belong to the chthonian cycle, and it is much more natural and Hellenic to sec in these a variation of the scheme of the " deified dead," than the ai)otheosis of some human wedding, which could far better be typified by an Olympian or heroic bridal, than by that of the sinister powers of decay and oblivion. Of rarer occurrence, but con- » The rmot colle^tioo of (hew is in (ik. Vaw Poem 4 of Br, Mac, -Mom. uui^^ su /V. 4« ^/ ^ifh^m ,^ in^. iV.„., I, lAi /:^4.-7, Auuri, K.,,^^., yy. ^ ^.j^ ^,, ,^^^^ ^,. ^,^ ,.W4*f./, n Jll (I illll ii)r I III .! m 64 DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY [64 veying the same fundamental idea is the carrying away ' of the soul of Herakles by Athene, or of a youth by Nike ; ' or even, by Laius, of Chrysippus,3 whose early and pathetic death would make his abduction an especially appropriate subject. And, still more in point, on a late vase we find Nike driving through the air in her four-horse chariot, met by Hermes and a youth, apparently the soul of the dead boy whom a lady sit- ting below amid her friends, is holding in her arms.* But among the populace, whose tendency is always to make things concrete, Persephone stood out as a distinct figure. In Homeric times, befitting the age, she is gloomy, the august, ayavfi UepaeipdvEia, who sends up ghosts, ddwAa,^ and takes under- standing from the dead.^ Hers is the grove of the sad wil- lows and poplars/ and it was from fear of her that Odysseus at last hurriedly departed from Hades.^ On the Dipylon tombs, the house of the dead is hers, dcjfxa UepaetpdvTj^j* koivw Uepae- ip&vrjq irdaiv i^^^c ^dXafKyv.^^ Likewise in the Tragedians, she receives V the dead," who are hers by lot," and she has the power to send them back if she wishes.*3 To her Electra prays for help in vengeance,'* and it is to her that Macaria is offered/^ But though dread and powerful, she is not — perhaps owing to the influence of the Mysteries — a repulsive being ; on the contrary, Euripides*^ calls her Kalliirmc avaaea and TCLv xpvco(jTS(i>avmf KSpav] and to her in common with her mother the narcissus and crocus '7 were sacred.'^ 1 Mon. Ined.y IV, Fl. 41 j et al.^ oft. By Nike, Passerii^ III, 276. 2 De la Borde : Col. des Vases Gr.y I, PI. 75; £t al. 8 Gerhard: Ap. Vasenb., PI. 6. * Passer iiy III, 274. ^Od., 10: 494-5- 8 O^., 1 1 : 634-5. ioA7wM,3S.11.3-4. " Or., 963-4. »* Cho., 490. ^' Or.y 964; 7-> 1373- ^Buchhoh, III. a., 317-8. * //., 16; 454. « Il.y 4 : 194. 8 S. fr. 636. w^y^r., 595-6. ill 66 DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY [66 ^7'\ THE OTHER WORLD 67 Aias' in mental anguish calls upon him, <1) Odvare 6dyare, vvv /z' ETriaKeipai fwXSv , and likewise Philoctetes,' when tortured with bodily pain, d -Odvare ^dvare^ ttq^ del Kah)i)fievo^ while the Chorus ^ in Oedipus at Colonus call him the helper of all alike, b S tmKovpog laoriXearog. The Thanatos of the Alcestis^ is not at all the true Thanatos of the poets and the inscriptions, but a stage-villain introduced to be worsted by the hero Herakles. The motif of the play required some such character, and neither Hades, Hermes nor Charon was appropriate. Thanatos alone remained, and in one respect was eminently fitted for this part; since his work,, unlike that of the others, does not take him into the lower world, but, like that of his brother Hypnus, has to do with the body rather than with the soul.5 Many things show this. On the vases we never find him pictured in lower world scenes,, nor in company with Hades or Charon, but sometimes with Hermes,^ with whose office he was closely associated; he is generally employed, alone ^ or with his brother Hypnus, in carrying away the dead^ or in laying them in the grave.^ There is nothing in either Homer or the Tragedians that does not accord with this. In the Alcestis he is the priest of the 1 Ai.y 854. ' Phil.y 797-^. Why Dindorf ^fx.% not use capitals here as in the previously quoted passage is not clear. ' O. C, 1220-3. ^Alc.^ 28-71. ^ Buchholzy III. a, 317, classes him as epichthonian. ^Gerhard: Anserl. Vasen.^ PL 121 ; Dumont et Chaplain: Ctr. Gr. Pr.y 1,27. ' Br. Mus. Gk. Vase E 463, Kantharos from Nola, 400 B. C. (Rare.) ^Jahrbuch des Inst.y 1895, ^^' 2; Gerhard: Anserl. Vasen., PI. 121 ; et al. ^Dumont et Chaplain: Cir. Gr. Pr.^ I, PL 27, 29; Robert: Thanatos, PL 1,2; et aLf frequent dead,' hpfj ^avdvruv, who shears their locks with the sword, the servant appointed* Kreiveiv bv dv xpv- Qdvarog ^vfzopaioT^g, Homer3 calls him. In the Tragedians he carries the bodies to rest,* MvaTog TTfxxpipuv a^fiara riKvuv^ and lays them in the tomb s and a pre- Persian inscription reads,^ dv iddvaroc [SaKpvjdeic ica^ixec. Being to so great a degree a divinity of the upper world, it was quite within the bounds of poetic possibility that Herakles should meet and wrestle with him. He expects, with good rea- son, to find him hovering around the tomb 7 to drink the blood, and it is only if unsuccessful with him, that he proposes follow- ing Alcestis to Hades and rescuing her thence, where she is out of the hands of Thanatos and in those of Persephone.^ But as the common conception of Thanatos was too dim and ill- defined for stage purposes, Euripides gives him a rough and boorish character, like that of Charon, but with wings and a sword, and brings him on the stage hallooing and swaggering, vaunting his power as a priest, but owning himself a servant, and by his ill-bred lack of feeling and greedy avarice richly meriting the contempt and dislike that Apollo bestows upon him. Robert says 9 that when Alcestis sees him, she sees some one but does not know who it is. Rather, she stes two daemons and recog- nizes them both very clearly, Charon the boatman, who stands at his oar and calls to her ; ^° and the " black-browed, winged Hades," who leads her away and by his presence darkens her eyes "—both offices of Hermes. In this last we see the triple character which the Alcestian Thanatos bears : that of Hermes who gives sleep to the eyes and leads the * Ale, 25, 74-6. ' 0. t:, 942. 8/l/r.,8so-3. 'M/f., 259-63,47, 268-^. » Ale, 49. 8 //., 13 : 544. 4 J/^a'., 1 1 1 1. ^RTaibel, 15, 1. 2. t Ale, 843-5, "42. ^Robert: Thanatos, p. 35. ^^Alc, 252-6. 68 DEA TH AND BURIAL IN A TTIC TRA GED Y w [68 soul away ; ' that of "Kcdaq in" 6pevr and like another Zeus judges crimes .-7 KOKel diKd^ei TdjurrXaK^fia^', ug Myog Zevg dAJlof ev Kafwvaiv vardTOQ dUac but he justifies the innocent,^ Acdc vsKpor. c<^ripo,. Plato,9 as well as Pindar and Orpheus,- insists on judgments, but gives them over into the hands of Rhadamanthys and Minos, of whom the Tragedians say nothing;" while Homer" gives them, as far as they go, to the Erinyes, who in the Tragedians '3 are only helpers of Hades, as was the nether Dike '* presumably. A IVth century inscription's mentions Sophrosyne as Hades' daughter. In Homer, Hades is a dread and mysterious power,'« but loses dignity when he becomes anthropomorphic.'^ He was V never a cult god,'^ except in Elis where he had once rendered service in some mythological battle.'9 Though properly 1 Per., 649-51, w. 689-90 J et at. » O. C, 1559-60. ^S. El., 184. M. Sup.y 230-1 ; O. C, 1606. »/»/. ^<;>., II, 366a. " Except Cyc, 273-4, which is not to the point. "/A, 19 ; 259-60; see above, p. 47, with n.3. " See below, p. 76 ff. " Ant., 451-2. ''Od., 11: 21^- 11,^ y, 845,654;^/ a/. "^/., 20: 61-5 5 5: 395-7 i ^f «/. See BuchhoU, III. a, 329-35, for the Homeric Hades; iTvanoTvitsch, pp. 90-3 for epithets in Homer and the Trage- "^Rohdi,^. 11^. ^^ Pans., 6: 25: 2. * Hec.y 2. * Per., 629. *Eum., 273-5. " Ro^<^^f pp. 566 ff., 420 ff , 500 ff " RTaibel, 34. i III 70 DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY [70 aaTvavdog,^ prayers * were made to him ; and we hear in a poetic or ironic way, of his songs 3 and dances.* The dead were his victims; 5 and Clytaemnestra gave Agamemnon the third blow as a votive offering to him.^ Like Hermes he is sometimes called upon to send the sleep of death ; ^ evvacov evvaaov oiKtrntTtji, fji6p^iaag' and: .8 eWe fJLE Koifiiaeie rbv Svadaifiov* 'Atdov fieTiatva v^Krepd^ r* avdyKa- but it will be seen that this is done through agents, uKinriTtn /i6p(^ and avdyKaf which very probably stand for Hermes. In another instance we find him sending death by the sword given to Aias, and for this Teucer calls him the fierce workman.^ Hades, then, in the Tragedians is an autocrat with unlimited sway in his own dominion, greedy of sovereignty, but just in the exercise of his power, never appearing on earth, but trans- acting his business there by means of his ministers. The whole realm of the dead was called Hades, or the house of Hades. Neither Homer '° nor the Tragedians were very sure whether it was situated below the ground or in the ex- treme west. The favorite Homeric term is Erebus," a word of Semitic origin and meaning " evening " or " west," but rather rare in the Tragedians," showing that it had no strong hold on the language. The earliest native Greek idea was probably 1 Ale, 424. ».s>/., 868-9; -£• ^^', 145; ^^«/- ^AIc, 25-6, 74-6; H. M.f 451-3. ' Trac/i»f 1040-2. a a C, 1558-64; f/al * E. Sup., 75. ^Ag., 1385-7; Phom., 1575-6. 8 ^j))., 1387-8. « Ai.y 1035. " Od., II : I-I2; //., 20: 61-2 ; see Buchholz, I. a, 49-52, 33^-8. *i //., 16 : 327 ; et al., oft. " Or.f 176 • et al.; Iwanowitsch^ p. 89. 71] THE OTHER WORLD ^j that the land of the dead was underground, as we may judge from the great " beehive " tombs built for them there, and from the fact that there was^ no consistency in orienting the dead, either in the Mycenaean age,' or in Dipylon or classical times in Athens.' As all existing hero- chapels, beginning with the famous Harpy Tomb, open to the west, and the lonians we know were noted for burying the dead so that they might look toward the setting sun,3 it seems likely that these eastern Greeks borrowed the idea from some of their non-Hellenic neighbors and passed it on to their brethren. Homer, because of his Ionian feeling, elaborated this theory most, and perhaps, also, because it was new ; but the old was stiU strong in men's minds. The Tragedians speak of Hades as kanipov ^tovf' but h Kara x^woq 'kiSag IS a much more common term ; « under Orphic influence there is an inclination to place the abode of souls in the upper air.^ As we have seen,7 this realm is not a pleasant place, but secret,^ dark,9 full of groans,^° vague and dreadful. But the Periclean Greeks were not without descriptions of the land of the dead from the hands of the poets. They had not only the Odyssey but the more specialized epics of the Minyad and the Nosti^"^ the former of which, Pausanias " teUs us, Polygnotus followed in general in his great painting at the Lesche. These descriptions appealed to the imagination rather than to the belief of the people ; as is evident from the fact that Aristophanes in the Frogs adheres to them much more closely than do the Tragedians. Still, some such gen- * Tsountas and Manatt, pp. 97, 89. ' Brueckner u. Pernice, see Plan of the Cemetery. ' ^/«A Solon, 10. * O. T, 178. Cf. kvwxiow&va^ O. C, 1559. » PAoen., 810 ; At., 571;^/ al. « See above, p. 26. ''See atx>ve, p. 15. 8 o. C, 1552; et a/., oft. * ^i., 394 ; ei at., oft. >« JVo., 433 ; et at. " For fragments of these see Kinkel: Epic. Graec. Frag., pp. 215-7, 52-6. " Pans., 10 : 28 : 7. il I ^1 ' ! ' i I 1 72 I>^A TH AND B URIAL IN A TTIC TRA GED Y [72 eral sketch must have been in the mind of the latter. In the prayer for Oedipus/ we have the plain of the dead, and the Stygian dwelling, and the dog growling at strangers, but in the next breath a prayer for eternal sleep. The rivers of Erebus were a striking feature well worked out by Homer,* especially the Styx, that terrible name by which the gods swore their most solemn oaths.3 The Tragedians frequently mention the Styx, Cocytus and Acheron, and Sophocles \^ speaks of 'A/da 'Kaymivm U^ivaqy^ but their typography is by no means clear ; and it is probable that the words really mean little more than woe and wailing. In Homer, Tartarus and Erebus are carefully distinguished j the former is for overthrown gods and situated as far below Erebus as heaven is high above the earth.s Aeschylus still regards Tartarus as a place of punishment for gods,^ but makes no clear distinction between it and Hades ; ^ nor does Sophocles,' nor Euripides.9 Whether or not the Homeric epics teach, as V Iwanowitsch holds, that there is no future punishment for mankind, the Minyad, followed by Polygnotus, insists strongly that there is ; " and the Tragedians hold with them. Aeschylus tells of the threats of the Furies," of the " other Zeus " who punishes crimes," and of the punishment of Sisyphus.'s So too Euripides tells of Tantalus and Ixion.'* They speak also very clearly of future rewards for those who are good and pious, as > O. C, 1556-78. * Od., 10: 513-5- "See Buchhoh, III. b, 317-8, for Homeric rivers. *5. El., 137-8 ; see Sep., 690, 855 ; Per., 669 ; et al. See Iwanowitsch, pp. 84-5, for refe. * //., 8 : 13-16. See Buchhoh, I. a, 52. • Pro,, 219-21. T Pro.y 1028-9, et al. ' O. C, 1389-90. • Or., 265. See Iwanowitsch, pp. 86-7, for refe. »o Paus., 4 : 33 : 7 ; 10 : 31 : 9-I i ; et al. oft. " Eum., 2lb'9>-*j^ ; et al, "^. Sup., 230-1, 415-6- w A. fr. 221. " Or., 982-5 ; H. M., 1298. 73] THE OTHER WORLD 71 we have seen.' The best that Homer could do for ordinary people was to let their tUiSka wander over the gloomy asphodel meadows ;=» but by Plato's time, under the influence of Musaeus and his son, the just and pious were supposed to spend their time in pleasure, which the populace imagined to consist in feasting and drinking, iiynakuEvoi KoklLarov aptrvq ^cadbv iikBrrv al6viov.^ But no feasting scenes, otherwise than the simple offering of a basket of cakes or fruit,* appear on Athenian tombstones until a late date, though on Spartan and Boeotian they are common. The Tragedians say nothing of feasting ; rather, poetic tradi- tion developed, out of the picture of the Elysian plain, "where life is easiest for men," and to which Menelaus and Helen were to be transported,s the fancy of the "isle of the blessed :"^ Kal T(p 7r?nvr/Ty MtviPieu i^ewv Kapa uaKapcjv KaroiKElv v^a6v egti fidpaiuov Achilles was to be there, and Cadmus and Harmonia.7 Homer had placed it at the end of the earth and presumably in the west; but Euripides locates it, once at least,^ AevKTjv Kar' aKTrjv hrog Ev^eivov ndpov. Farnell 9 says there is a legend of the Chthonian Cronus ruhng over the isles of the blest and the departed heroes. In the Orphic Argonautica^'' there is said to be in the fabulous N. W. Europe, near the golden-flowing Acheron, a city Hermioneia, m which dwells ytvn SiKaiuTdTuv avOpoTrw, omv dnoip^ifihoig aveotg vavloLO rirvKToi. * See above, pp. 28, 50. *0d., 11: 539. 8 />/. ^^^^ 11^ ^6^ ^^ * Conze, PI. 93; common on funeral vases. See also H, Von Fritz: Zu der Griech. Totenmahlrelie/s, in Mittheil., 1896. * Od., 4 : 563-7. 6 Hel., 1676-7. ' And., 1260-2; Bac, 1338-9. ^ And., 1262 ; /. T., 436; see Bac, 1361-2. » Farnell: Gk. Cults, I, 30; see Hesiod: Works and Days, 169 ; Pindar, Ol, 2, 70- (I owe these references to the courtesy of Mr. Farnell.) ^"^ Lines 1135-47; see Rohde, p. 200, for further refs. )/ ir -4 DEATH AND BURIAL IN ATTIC TRAGEDY [74 Homer calls Hades' ^vUprm> Kpare,«,io, and the country itself wide-gated.' The Tragedians often mention the gates of Hades,3 and as guardian of these, the dog. Sophocks Calls 'Aidov rplKpavw OKvT^ie, aizpoafrnxov repag, and describes him as couching at the gate of Hades,' where Hermes is implored to keep him quiet. Admetus « calls h.m , nMrc^of «W; and .,^ he always is in Horner;^ whence Pau- sanias' argues with much force that he was not originally a dog but more probably a serpent, as «,<.«. is a term for any fierce beast. In the vase paintings, especially the later ones, he appears frequently as a three-headed dog, and that type had probably become fixed before the Vth century In the Tragedians he figures chiefly as the captive of Herakles m h.s famous visit to the underworld.' On the tombstones we do not find the three-headed monster; and though a dog often appears,- it is probably the pet of the household or the com- panion of the hunter, and not the savage guardian of the lower regions. . , , t, i The only other dweller of the land of the dead whom Foly- gnotus introduces into his paintings is the horrid demon Eurynomus, who, according to Pausanias." is not mentioned in the literature up to that time and may be an allegorical figure. But the Tragedians tell us that Erebus had other mhabitants. There dwelt Night," whose anger even Zeus feared ; '3 and her daughters the Moirai ; '- and those other daughters, the dread- 1 £?M^J..^^3^■,eial. * Track, mi-i. » O. C, I56S-78. •^^,360- ' See Iwauowitsci, pp. IO3-5. " /'««*•. 3 = ^5 : 4-5- » H. M., 24-5 ; et al. i» Conte, PI. 23, 28, 130 (no. 677), et al. oft. "/•flBJ., 10:28:7. "On, 174-6- « //., 14 : 259-6.. " P""""' ^- ^•' '• *'-'• 75] THE OTHER H^ORLD 75 ful Keres, of whom we hear so much in Homer,' and whom Megara pictures her sons as marrying,' and whom later Lyssa says Herakles is calling up by his bellowing.' The Sirens, though not actually dwellers in the other world, are by Homer placed on the way thither ; * and from their frequent represen- tations on tombstones from the Vlth century down,' and their ^^ office of carrying souls as depicted on the Harpy Tomb,* they may have shared with Charon the duty of transporting the souls of the dead to Hades. Euripides mentions them as Xi^ovdf /c(5/5ai, and singers of mournful songs.7 Nemesis was another daemon closely connected with the dead, ready to re- sent any insulting word regarding them.^ The Sphinx was sent up from Hades,9 and had a fitting place on the tomb." Another uncomfortable neighbor was lambe or Baubo, men- tioned in the Frogs, whom M. Heuzey " supposes to be the antitype of "the numerous caricatures of old women and nurses found among the terra-cottas placed about the dead." A more prominent figure is Hecate, who, though not men- tioned in Homer, is one of the chief characters on the vases of the IVth century. Hesiod first mentions her as a victim of the anger of Artemis, w^hose follower and chthonian double she became; and Farnell ^* thinks she was of Phrygian origin and came into Athens about the middle of the Vlth century. Before the Peloponnesian War, her image was placed at the doors of the Athenians to avert evil.'3 She presided over graves, and her images stood at crossroads to keep ghosts down. "The character of Hecate YJ^L6ovx represents her with her head crowned with oak leaver and serpents. Alcamenes was the first to give her three heads and three bodies.3 To this triple Hecate living in the midst of infernal monsters, the whip is often given to maintain order among the shades.* ' In the Tragedians Hccalc is confused with Artemis ' and with Persephone.^ She is the mistress iA spells invoked by Medea ;' and, ruling over journeys by ^y and night, the Chorus^ implore her to aid Crcusa in poisoning Ion. She sends ghosts'' and madness;- and, as in the later vase-paintingn, she carries the torch at the marriage of the soul to Hades.'* The only daemons whom Buchhok will admit into the circle of the chthonians with Hades and Persephone are the Erinyes." Aeschylus calls them daughters of Night » and dwellers of Tarunis H but Sophocks calls them children of Earth and ' FarmtK H* $01-12. 556^ ^Ol. •^\ /^ira Sik X>«r. #/ S»/., IV, p. 1156. »/)**<• the destruction of war he calls. T«.mti ^M 'E^«*w.^ They are called »A^> and K^* and «)itTrup.' and they ^cni to have pat taken of the nature of all of these.* They were black in color* MthEmii ff 'IV-fcf , like iywm *i\fr,- angry dogs, and from their eyes distilled blood." The Priestess of Delphi describes them:" ** A wondrous troop of women sits sleeping in the seats, though not women but Gorgons I call them . . . wing- less and black in appearance, abominable in kind. And they snore with unapproachable breath, and from their eyes they diHtil hateful violence. Their dress !s fit to wear neither at the images of the gods nor in the dwellings of men." They are mad. and are woven about with crowding serpents."^ It is no- tkeable that though in the Ckciphorof and the other plays they are visible to Orc$t« only, in the Eumenides they arc visible to all. as is necessary from the nature of the play. In Sopho- cles they are many Iwndcd and many- footed.'* and he speaks of the twin-fury ."5 as though there were but two. Euripides says there arc three f and his description differs a little from that of Aeschylus:" •• Do you not j»cc thiu t»n»kc of Hade*, that she wishes to slay me> with horrid vipers fringed against me ? And breathing forth from her garments fire and murder, die beats with her wings^ bearing my mother in her arms, a • o. C% 40, 106. • Srf,. 5T4- » Enm.^ 417. » Or.. 154^ ^ Ai,, A, but none feel their presence as does the matricide Orestes. Otherwise they are good and kind," but fear of them keeps men from murder and evil-doing." In Sophocles their mission is somewhat different. They do not fall on Orestes at all ; but Clytaemnestra fears them," and Electra implores them with the other chthonians to help her and her brother in their enterprise ; '3 and says that the slaying I Or., 34-45, et al. « Or., 268-70. » Cko., 924; Eum., 75-7; et al. * Eum., 264-5, 3^2, 305. 5 Eum., 267-8. « Eum., 210, 604-5. 7 CAo., 577-8. 8 cAo., 651 ; ^/ aL oft. ' -^^A* 720-S, et al. 10 Eum., 313-5, 895 ; *S>/., 699-701. II Eum., 494-524. " S. EL, 275-6. w S. EL, 1 10-7 ; et aL j^-\ THE OTHER WORLD -9 of Aegisthus will destroy the twin-fury,' as if the sacrifice of the really guilty man would stay their anger. Oedipus in- vokes the Erinyes to carry out his curses on his sons' for their harsh treatment of him. But outrage on the dead as well as unjust death claimed their attention, as is shown by the threat 3 to Creon and to the enemies of Aias, as well as those to the slayers of Laius and Herakles. In Euripides, again, though the Erinyes are not limited to the chastisement of kindred slaughter,* we have the tortures of the matricide Orestes with added detail. In the Choephoroe, the Erinyes sieze him immediately, but in the Orestes^ they do not come upon him until at night when he is watching be- side his mother's body. In the Eumenides, Athene by her judgment and her persuasions frees him ; but in Euripides she drives them away with her Gorgon-headed shield,^ and instead of departing satisfied and with blessings, they rush in terror into the chasm,^ and do not all acquiesce in Athene's decision.^ It is Sophocles who draws the picture of the Grove of the Eumenides, one of the finest bits of natural scenery in the Tragedians. Here among the bay, the olive and the vine, the nightingales sing sweetly, undisturbed by human sound, and a limpid stream flows through the untrodden grass.9 Expiation for entering their grove must be made by pouring a triple libation of spring water and honey from a cup wreathed with fresh-shorn lamb's wool; thrice nine branches of olive must be laid on the place; and after a prayer calling them Eumenides and spoken inaudibly, the trespasser must slip away without looking back.^° » s. EL, 1080. * o. c, 1391, 1433-4. *Ant., 1074-6; Ai., 835-44: O. T., 47 '"^ 5 Track., 808-9. *Med., 1389 ; E. EL, 1546-8. » Or., 401-2, 408. • E. EL, 1252-7. "^ E' ^^M 1270-2. 8 /. T., 970-1 ; see 940-86. • O. C, 16-8, 124-32, I5S-60. M O. C, 466-90. So DEA TH AND B URIA L IN A TTIC TRA GED Y [go The Eumenides had a regular cult at Athens, sharing in the worship of Athene in the abode of Erechtheus, receiving the first fruits of the sacrifices, honored with blazing torches, with processions of youths and women in purple robes, with burnt- offerings and songs and libations/ And in the statues which the Athenians erected of them there was nothing horrible.* They were worshiped also at the hearth of the home with wineless soothing libations.3 The idea of death was never absent from the mind of the V Greek. Turn where he would, engage in what occupation or pleasure or duty he saw fit, the eyes of the dead and of the mighty gods of the dead were upon him. Sacrifices and prayers to the deities of high heaven might be slighted or omitted, but those to the x'^^viol never. Their power arose from the ground on which he trod, and penetrated even to his dreams and to his most secret plans ; it dogged every step of his life, and extended into the remotest future. The Olympians were a gay and joyous folk, content that mankind should be reasonably happy and prosperous, since this was to their in- terest ; and however vindictive they might be, their vengeance of necessity stopped with the dissolution of soul from body. But they of the lower world were ever envious and grudging against him who enjoyed the blessings they had lost, regard- ing him with a vigilance unforgetting, unrelenting and unre- mitting, not to be put off with excuses or appeased with paltry offerings. Man, the living man, owed them a heavy rent for the brief lease of his tenement, and they exacted payment to the uttermost farthing. What wonder that Plato's teaching fell on charmed but unbelieving ears; that Stoics and Epi- cureans alike, finding the burden too great to be borne, de- \/ clared there is no hereafter; that the populace seized upon every new orgy, and welcomed every foreign god of the dead, 1 Eum., 804-7, 833-6, 854-7, 1022 flf., 1033-47. \' 81 THE OTHER WORLD [81 like the mystic Dionysus or the solemn deep-eyed Serapis ; or that of all the gods, most popular by far was Asklepios the healer ; for he prolonged man's little span of life and for a brief moment held back the curtain which must envelop him. Rightly was the disembodied soul named okl^, for it was the shadow which the Greek could never elude or escape. •^ /: yf-t, ^ Paus.y 1 : 28: 6. * Eum.^ 106-9. VITA Lucia Catherine Graeme Grieve was born of Scotch parents in Dublin, Ireland, April 30, 1862. Her early education was received in Mrs. J. T. Benedict's French and English School in New York city. In 1878 she entered Wellesley College in the Academic Department, and in 1883 received the A. B. degree. For the next ten years she was engaged in teaching in preparatory schools and colleges. In 1893 she received the A. M. degree from Wellesley College for work in Greek and Roman Philosophy. From 1893 till 1898 she was a student in Columbia University, her subjects being Greek, Sanskrit and Hebrew, under the direction of Professors Mer- riam. Perry and Wheeler, Jackson and Gottheil. The summer of 1894 was spent in the British Museum in the study of the Greek Vases, under the general guidance of Prof A. C. Mer- riam. During the year 1 896-7, she attended courses in Oxford University, England, given by Prof Percy Gardner, Mr. Haigh, Mr. Sidgwick, Prof Macdonnell, and Canon Driver. (83) ■« ,t- -fV ■..,<^ t . ■■- 5^ >_^-^^., h • r^:-. v*;v^' COLUMBIA UN VERS 002605 TY 532 rsi 00 CD CD O III BK\mt DO NOT ■*' > ':^^ :^y' w^' ,.-> ■" ;.;• V, t .mm I !«■ 9 ' ^ ^ '• .,.>l ■ :%. '^t