. ■'»-" Ji ■ '■•\> i- ■"■,"*.'■' •4 'jili-' vir THE SEGUIN COLLECTION OF BOOKS RELATING TO THE^ — f ' NERVOUS SYSTEM THE BEQUEST OF EDWARD C. SEGUIN, M.D. TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, NEW YORK. Q t A I — This book is not to be removed DOOKi^"" \~ "5 from the Department of Pathology. COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY THE LIBRARIES HEALTH SCIENCES LIBRARY THE CROONIAN LECTURES ON CEREBRAL LOCALISATION THE CROONIAN LECTURES ON CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. DeLIVEEED BEFOIIE THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS, June. 1890. By DAVID FERRIER, MB., LL.D., F.R.8., F.R.C.P., Pro/eaaor of Keuropathology , Kimj's College, London ; Physician to King's College Hospital and to the National Hos]>Ual for the Paralysed and Epileptic. WITH ILLiSTHATlOMi. LONDON : SMITH, ELDER A ^M) CO 1.'., WATERLOO PL.\CK, 1HJ)(). Beprinted from the Bkitish Medical Jouenal. CONTENTS. Lecture I. Introductory Remarks— Effects of Ablation of the Cerebral Hemis- pheres: (1) in Osseous Fishes— Vision in Brainless Fishes— Vulpian's Experiments— Steiner's Experiments— (2) in Frogs — Experiments of Goltz and Steiner- Schrader's Experiments: (3) in Birds — Flourens' Experiments — Longet's Experiments — Vision in Brainless Birds — Experiments of McKendrick, etc. — Munk's Experiments — Schrader's Experiments: (4) in Mam- mals — Experiments on Rabbits — Longet's Experiments — Vision inBrain'ess Rabbits— Christiani's Experiments ; Munk's Experiments — Goltz's Experiments on Dog- — General Con- clusions—Intelligence of the Lower Centres— Spontaneity — Conditions of Consciousness — Relations of the Hemispheres to the Lower Centres— The Question of Localisation of Function — Gall's Opinions — Flourens' Doctrines — Bouillaud's Experiments and Observations — Dax's Observations; Broca's Observations — Hughlings Jackson's Views — Brown-S^quard's Views — Exner's Views on Localisation — Fritsch and Hitzig's Experiments— The Author's Experiments— Excitability of the Cerebral Cortex— Mechanical Excitability— Chemical Excit- ability—Electrical Excitability— Diffusion of Currents — Excit- nbility of the Medullary Fibres— Motor Fibres of the Internal Cipsule— Relative Exjitability of the Cortex and Medullary Fibres — Laws of Excitability of the Cortex — Experiments of Franck and Pitres PP- 1 — 24 Lecture II. Electrical Reactions — Prefrontal Area — Oculo-motor Area — Leg Area^Arm Area — ^Area of Face. Tongue, Larynx, etc — Mar- ginal Convolution — Angular Gyrus and Occipital Lobe — Superior Temporal Gyrus — Hippocampal Lobule and Gyrus Hippocampi — Electrical Reactions in Man — Character and Differentiation of the Electrical Reactions — Signification of the Electrical Reactions — Sensory and Motor Centres — The Sensory C^-ntres: (1) The Visual Centres — Electrical Reactions of the Occipito-Angular Region— The Author's Experiments — Experiments of Luciani and Tamburini, Scbafer; Significa- tion of the Oculomotor Reactions — Experiments of Danillo, Bechterew, Munk — The Author's Earlier Experiments on the Angular Gyrus and Occipital Lobe — Later Experiments of the Author and Yeo — Munk's Experiments — Experiments of Horsley and Schafer pp. 27 — 48 Lecture III. Visual Centre*' Continued — Experiments of Schafer and Sanger- Brown — Effects of Lesions of the Occipito-Temporal Region — Experiments of Sanger-Brown and Gilman-I'hompson — Ex- periments of Lannegrace — Lesions of the Angular Gyrus — Experiments of Munk, Schafer, and the Author — Relations of the Angular Gyrus — Hemiopic Pupillary Reaction — Lanne- grace's Theory of Cerebral Amblyopia — Pathology of Hemiopia ia Man — Lesions of the Cuneus — Word Blindness — Visual Centres in Lower Vertebrates — F]xperiments of Ilitzig, Goltz, Dalton, Munk, Loeb, Luciani, Bechterew, Gilman-Thompson and Sanger-Brown — Munk's Scheme of the Visual Centres in Dogs — Loeb's Experiments — Visual Centres in Rabbits — Visual Centres in Pigeons — Visual Centres in Owls — General Conclusions pp. 51 — 72 0^^ VI CONTENTS. Lecttjbe IV. The Auditory Centre — Methods of Investigation— Electrical Re- actions — Earlier Experiments of the Author — Experiments of the Author and Yeo — Schafer's Experiments — Recent Experi- ments of the Author — The Auditory Centre according to Munk — Luciani and Tamburini's Experiments — Comparative Ana- tomy of the Auditory Centre — Deafness from Cerebral Disease in Man ; observations of Shaw, Wernicke and Fried! ander — Word-deafness ; its Pathology — Irritative Lesions of Auditory Centre — Atrophy of Auditory Centre — Central Relations of the Auditory Nerve ; observations of Baginsky Flechsig, and Bechterew. Centre of Tactile and Common Sensation — The Sensory Paths in the Spinal Cord — Experiments of Ludwig and Woroschiloff — Ascending Degeneration in Spinal Cord — The Author's Experiments on the Spinal Cord of Monkeys — Hemisection of the Spinal Cord — Paths of the Muscular Sense — Analysis of Recorded Cases — Observations by the Author .■ pp. 75-99 Lectuee V. Tactile Centre continued — Course of Sensory Tracts towards Brain — Position of Sensory Tracts in eras cerebri — Position of Sensory Tracts in Internal Capsule — Central Relations of Sensory Tracts — Earlier Experiments of the Author on Hip- pocampal Region — Experiments of the Author and Yeo — Experiments of Horsley and Schafer on Hippocampal Region and Gyrus Fornicatus — Relations of the Falciform Lobe — France's observations on Descending Degeneration from Lesions of gyrus fornicatus. Olfactory and Gustatory Centres — Anatomical Relations of Olfactory Tract — Broca's Views — Zuckerkandl on the Anatomy of the Olfactory Centre — Com- parative Anatomy of the Hippocampus ; Sir William Turner's observations — Relations of the Anterior Commissure — Obser- tions of Flower, Meynert, Ganser, etc. — Relations of the Fornix — Electrical Irritation of Hippocampal Lobule — Inves- tigation of the Sense of Smell in Monkeys — Earlier Experi- ments of the Author — Experiments of Schafer and Sanger- Brown — Recent Experiments of the Author — Munk's observa- tions on Dogs — Luciani's Views — Conclusions from Clinical Observations pp. 103-126 Lectube VI. Motor Centres — Rolandic Area — Effects of Destruction of the Motor Centres in Monkeys — Experiments of the Author, Horsley and Scha^^er — Effects of Lesions of the Marginal Gyrus — The Laryngeal Centres — Bilateral Relations of the Cerebral Hemispheres — Lesions of the Motor Area in Man — Characters of Cortical Paralysis — Goltz's Observations on Dogs — Lesions of the Motor Area and Affections of Sensation — Observations of the Author, Horsley and Schafer, Goltz and Bechterew — Analysis of Clinical Cases — Motor Paralysis and the Muscular Sense — Muscular Sense in Hemiansesthesia — Bastian's Views — Experiments of Marique, Exner and Paneth — Relations of the Spinal and Cerebral Motor Centres. The Frontal Centres — Anatomical Relations of the Frontal Centres — Effects of Electrical Irritation — Destruction of the Post-frontal and Pre-frontal Centres — I'sychical Effects of Lesions of Frontal Lobes— Conclusion pp. 129—152 LECTURE I, Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2010 witii funding from Open Knowledge Commons (for the Medical Heritage Library project) http://www.archive.org/details/croonianlectureOOferr ox CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. LECTURE I. Introdttotoky. Mr. President and Gentlemen,— While highly appreciating the distinguished honour of being appointed Croonian Lecturer of the College of Physicians, I must confess to having undertaken the onerous duties of the oflSce with considerable hesitation and trepidation, for, though the subject which I have chosen is one to which I have devoted a good deal of attention, and which, in one of its aspects, namely, The Localisation of Cerebral Disease, I have already had the honour of discussing before you as Gulston- ian Lecturer, yet, considering the enormous amount of work that has been done in this department in recent years, and the nume- rous problems which still remain unsolved, I have felt that, with my other duties, time and strength would scarcely permit me to do justice to my subject. I could not feel satisfied with merely repeating the views which I have elsewhere, and at various times, expressed on this subject, and which, to many of you at least, are sufficiently well known ; therefore, it seemed necessary that I should, for the purpose of these lectures, undertake new investiga- tions, in order to throw light, if possible, upon some of the points which are still in dispute. But to compress into practically a few months of otherwise fully occupied time what might well be the undivided labour of a long period has proved a difficult task, and I have fallen far short of what I had hoped to accomplish, though I trust that some of the results at which I have been able to arrive may contribute towards a solution of some of the vexed questions. I purpose in these lectures to sketch the evolution oi the doctrine of cerebral localisation, to indicate the principal data on which it is ba^ed, and to discuss, in the light of the most re- B M 2 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. cent investigations, the evidence for and against the existence of specific centres, and their exact position in the cerebral cortex. Before considering the facts bearing directly upon the specific localisation of f anction in the cerebral cortex, I think it advisable — nay, even necessary — to consider the effects of ablation of the cerebral hemispheres in different classes of animals. A due con- sideration of these phenomena affords, I think, a satisfactory ex- planation of the chief objections which have been urged against localisation in general, and, at the same time, also renders un- necessary certain hypotheses as to the functional substitution of one part of the cortex by another, which have been — and, in my opinion, rightly — regarded by the opponents of localisation as altogether subversive of its fundamental principles. Recent researches on the effects of the removal of the cerebral hemispheres, by improved methods, have necessitated some im- portant modifications of the doctrines which, up to quite a recent date, have been generally entertained on the subject. Let us begin with fishes. When in osseous fishes the ganglia (which correspond morphologically to the cerebral hemispheres of the vertebrates) are entirely removed, there is little, if anything, to distinguish them from perfectly normal animals. They main- tain their natural attitude, and use their tails and fins in swim- ming with the same vigour and precision as before. It has generally been said that brainless fishes possess no spontaneity, but seem as if impelled by some irresistible impulse (occasioned by the impressions communicated to the surface of their bodies by the water in which they are sustained) to swim until they are exhausted by pure neuro-mu?cular fatigue. In their course, how- ever, as was shown by Vulpian, they do not blindly rush against obstacles, but turn to the right or left, according to circumstances, as if still possessed of some sense of vision. Vulpian says ^ " In fact, when the cerebral hemispheres have been removed from a fish which does not readily succumb tc this kind of operation (a roach, for example), not only may it be urged to move by bringing an object before its eyes, but I have proved that it avoids obstacles; for, by placing a stick to the right or left, a few centimetres from its eye, I have frequently caused the fish to turn in the opposite direction." Steiner ^ does not admit the absence of spontaneity in fishes so operated upon, for he has seen that they occasionally remain at 1 Systime Nerveux, p. 669. 2 Die Functionen des C entralnervmsy stems ; Zweite Abtheilung : Die Fische, 1888. ABLATION OF CEREBRAL REMLSPHERES. 3 the bottom, at other times balance themselves at various heights in the water, and now and then swim about freely, without any obvious alterations in the conditions by which they are surrounded. He has also shown, and in this he has been conflrmed by Vulpian,^ that they not only see, but are able to find, their food. If worms be thrown into the water in which they are swimming, they im- mediately pounce upon them. If a piece of string similar in size to a worm be thrown in, they are able to detect the difference, and either dii^regard it entirely, or drop it after having seized it. Not only do they seize their food, but they discriminate between different kinds, selecting some, and rejecting others. They even to some extent distinguish colours, for when one red and a few white wafers are thrown into the water, the fish almost invariably selects the red in preference to the white. From these facts it would appear that the fish without cerebral hemispheres can see, distinguish colours to some extent, catch its prey, discriminate between different kinds of food, direct its movements with precision, and, in fact, behave to all appearance like a normal animal. The only difference observed by Steiner was that brainless fishes appeared more impulsive and less cautious than those which had not been operated upon. What has been said above applies, however, only to Teleosteous fifches. Quite different results appear to follow removal of the cerebral hemispheres in Elasmobranchs. Thus the dog-fish, ac- cording to Steiner,^ after this operation is entirely deprived of spontaneity, and is quite unable to find the food (sardines) by which it is surrounded. The difference between the two orders of fishes is, however, more apparent than real, for the dog-fish is guided mainly by its sense of smell, while the activity of the osseous fish is conditioned more especially by vision; hence, in the dog-fish, removal of the cerebral hemispheres, which are almost exclusively related to the sense of smell (Fig. 1.— a), abolishes all the reactions conditioned by this sense ; while in the osseous fish, the primary visual centres (optic lobes), being intact, the ordinary modes of activity, which are conditioned mainly by the eyes, continue to all appearance unmodified. Frogs. — According to the researches, more particularly of Goltz* and Steiner,** frogs deprived of their cerebral hemispheres behave, » Comptes liendus. Tome 102 and 103, 1886. ♦ Op. cit. * Functionen der Nervencentren des Frosches, 1869. * Pki/siologie den Froxchhirns, 188.'>. b2 4 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. cceteris paribus, essentially like fishes similarly treated; they maintain their normal attitude, and resist all attempts to over- throw their equilibrium. If laid on their backs they will turn over and attempt to regain their ordinary position. If the basis of support on which they rest is tilted in any direction, they will clamber up, forwards, or backwards until they gain a position of stability. Their powers of locomotion are retained, and their limbs are co-ordinated with precision. If a foot be pinched, or any irritation applied to the posterior part of the body, they will hop away ; thrown into the water they will swim, and continue swimming until they have reached the side of the vessel, up which, if possible, they will clamber and rest in peace. It would, in fact, be difficult, so far as their movements and response to A Fig. 1.— Brain of dog-fish (after Steiner). A, cerebral hemisphere; B, optic lobe ; c, cerebellr.m ; o, olfactory lobe. peripheral stimuli are concerned, to distinguish between a normal and a brainless frog. If the back be gently stroked the frog will answer uniformly with a croak, as if of pleasure or enjoyment. If the animal be put in a vessel containing water, the temperature of which is gradually raised, it will jump out as soon as the bath becomes uncomfortably hot. If placed at the bottom of a pail of water, it will ascend to the surface to breathe. If the vessel be inverted over a pneumatic trough and filled with water, sustained by barometric pressure, the frog will ascend to the top as before, but not finding there the oxygen necessary to satisfy its respira- tory craving, it will work its way downwards, and ultimately succeed in making its escape out of the vessel on to the free sur- face of the trough. Like the fish, the brainless frog undoubtedly possesses some form of vision ; it does not, when urged to move, rush blindly against an obstacle, but will leap over it, or turn to ABLATION OF CEREBRAL HEMISPHERES. 5 the right or left, or otherwise avoid it. In all these respects a brainless frog behaves like a normal one, but one noteworthy difference has been signalised by most observers — namely, that the brainless frog, unless disturbed by some form of peripheral stimulus, will remain for ever quiet on the same spot, until, in fact, it becomes dried up and converted into a mummy. All spontaneity — that is, varied activity under apparently the same external conditions — appears to be annihilated ; its past expe- rience has been blotted out, and it views with indifference signs and threats which would formerly have made it flee. It is also generally stated that the brainless frog has lost its instincts of self-preservation, and either feels no hunger or possesses no power to satisfy its physical necessities, so that it dies in the midst of plenty. The more recent experiments, however, of Schrader'^ would seem to show that removal of the hemispheres deprives the frog neither of spontaneity, nor of special instincts, nor of the ability to feed itself ; for he has observed brainless frogs which have been kept alive for long periods, apparently " sponta- neously " jump from the pier of a galvanometer, absolutely free from all tendency to vibration, alternate between land and water in the aquarium, crawl under stones, or bury themselves in the earth at the beginning of winter, and, when cautiously submerged under water, begin to swim exactly like normal frogs under the same conditions. These frogs also, after the period of hyberna- tion, or in the summer, when their wounds were entirely healed, diligently caught the flies that were buzzing about in the vessels in which they were kept. It would appear, therefore, if these observations are correct, that the principal points of distinction between the brainless and the normal frog — namely, the absence of spontaneity and the power to feed itself, which are said to especially characterise the former— are no longer capable of being upheld, and that the brainless frog behaves precisely like the brainless fish above described. Birds.— Let us now proceed to consider the effects of the re- moval of the cerebral hemispheres in birds, the next higher class of vertebrates, and more especially in pigeons. These have been rendered familiar to all by the classical researches of Flourens ;* but though the picture he has drawn has been accepted as in the main correct, there have been, and there still are, some differences of opinion as to the facts, and more particularly as to their mode ' Physlologie des Froschgehirns, PJldger's Archiv fur Physiologie, 1887, Band 41 * iSysteme Nerveux, 1842. 6 CEREBBAL LOCALISATION. of interpretation. There is, however, no doubt that after this operation pigeons show no disturbance of station or locomotion. They maintain their normal attitude, and resist all attempts to overthrow their balance. Left to themselves they appear, at first at least, to be plunged in profound sleep. From this condition they are easily aroused by a gentle push or pinch. When so urged they march forwards, and should they happen to step over the edge of the table, on which they are placed, they will flap their wings and regain their base of support. Thrown into the air they fly with all due precision and co-ordination. After each manifestation of activity so induced they subside into their original state of repose. Occasionally, and apparently without any external stimulus, they may look up and yawn, shake them- selves, dress their feathers with their beaks, move a few steps forwards or backwards, especially after defaecation, and then settle down quietly, standing sometimes on one leg, sometimes on the other. They are altogether unable to feed themselves ; but, if fed artificially, deglutition, digestion, and nutrition go on in a normal manner, and the animals may be kept alive for an indefinite period. Flourens was of opinion that the removal of the cerebral hemispheres annihilated all the senses, and rendered the animals blind, deaf, and devoid of smell, taste, and tactile sensibility. These conclusions were, however, disputed by Magendie, Bouillaud, Cuvier, and, in particular, by Longet^ and Vulpian." Longet found that the animals appeared to see, inasmuch as they would follow the movements of a flame held in front of their eyes at a sufli- cient distance to prevent all sensation of heat, and also when urged to move, occasionally at least, avoided obstacles in their path. Also they started at loud sounds, such as a pistol shot, made in their immediate vicinity ; and from their movements and gestures appeared to feel impressions made upon the nerves of common sensation. As regards the senses of taste and smell, he found it impossible to arrive at any definite conclusions in animals of this order, and looked upon the statements of Flourens as not supported by convincing evidence. Longet believed that the re- moval of the cerebral hemispheres annihilated only perception proper, as distinct from crude or brute sensation, which had its centre in the mesencephalic ganglia. The question as to the sense of sight in brainless pigeons has been much discussed, that is, whether not mere impressionability 9 Anatomie et Physiologie du Systeme Nerveux, 1842. 10 Op. cit. ABLATION OF CEREBRAL HEMISPHERES. 7 to light exists, but as to whether the animals see, in the sense of being able to guide their movements in accordance -with their retinal impressions. McKendrick^^ was of opinion that removal of the one cerebral hemisphere caused blindness in the opposite eye; and J astro wit z,^- from his own experiments, arrived at the same conclusion (on this see further below). The experiments of Blaschko," under the direction of Munk, led to no very definite conclusions on this point, though it seemed as if the removal of the one hemisphere did not cause total blindness in the opposite eye. But Munk himself^* has made it the subject of a consider- able number of experiments. He found that in a certain number of pigeons, from which he had attempted to remove the cerebral hemispheres, vision was not entirely abolished, and the animals were able to avoid obstacles placed in their path. Careful investi- gations, however (post mortem) revealed the fact that in such cases the hemispheres had not been entirely destroyed, vision continuing to some extent in the eye opposite the hemisphere, the extirpation of which had not been absolutely complete. In those cases, however, in which not a trace of either hemisphere was allowed to remain, blindness was complete and absolute. These animals, in their attitude and reaction to peripheral stimuli, etc., exhibited the symptoms already described. The brightest light, however, caused no result beyond contraction of the pupil. The animals, when urged to move, ran against every obstacle which came in their way. When thrown into the air, they flew with retracted head and half-raised trunk, outstretched legs, and dashed against obstacles, or fell bump on the ground and slid a considerable distance before coming to a standstill. The phenomena described by Munk certainly indicate total blindness on the part of his pigeons, and he is of opinion that all those who have held that ablation of the cerebral hemispheres does not cause total blindness are in error, owing to the fact of the extirpation of the hemispheres not having been complete. Schrader, however,^^ describes the phenomena which he observed in two pigeons, from which, according to the post-mortem exami- nation of von Recklinghausen, he had entirely removed every por- U Observations and Bxperiments on the Corpora Striata and Cerebral Hemi- spheres of Pigeons, Royal Society, Edinburgh, 1873. 12 Ueberdie Bedeutung des Grosshirns, Archiv.Jilr Psychiatric, 1876. 13 Das fiehcentrvm be.i Froschen, Berlin, 1880. »« '* Uber die centralen Organe fiir das Sehen und das H()ren bei den Wirbe- tbleren ; SUzungs/jerichte d. Berlin Akademie d. Wissenschajten, July, 1883. 1* Physiologic des Vogelgehirns, Pfliiger's Arehiv, Bd. 44. 8 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. tion of the cerebral hemispheres. None of the cortex remained, but only minute remnants of the cut cerebral peduncles, which ■were, moreover, in a state of softening. These pigeons, within a few days after the operation, behaved in such a manner as can only be explained by their still retaining some form of vision. For they not only avoided obstacles in their path, or in their flight, but appeared able to fly from one place and alight securely on another. These flights were mostly, if not entirely, caused by conditions calculated to induce a change of position, such, for in- stance, as mounting them on a narrow basis of support, or putting them through balancing experiments. They never on any occa- sion spontaneously flew upwards from the ground. With respect to the sense of hearing, Schrader verified in some of his animals the observations of Longet, that loud sounds, like the explosion of a percussion cap, caused a sudden start, but be- yond this there were no signs of impressionability to auditory stimuli. If the results described by Schrader are correct, and of this the description given by himself and von Eecklinghausen seems to leave little room for doubt, we shall then be obliged to class birds with fishes and frogs, which without doubt retain their sense of sight, and guide their movements accordingly, notwith- standing the complete removal of their cerebral hemispheres. Mammals. — While removal of the cerebral hemispheres (includ- ing corpora striata) in the lower vertebrates is compatible with survival for a considerable length of time, the case is different with mammals. In these the operation causes fatal shock, or is followed by secondary effects which result in speedy death. For this reason it has not beem found possible to determine, as in the lower vertebrates, what functions, after considerable lapse of time, might still be exhibited by the lower centres in the entire absence of the higher. The mammals on which the operation has succeeded best have been chiefly of the lower orders, such as rabbits, guinea-pigs, and rats. When the hemispheres have been removed from a rabbit or a guinea-pig, the animal, at first utterly prostrate, begins after a varying interval, say from half an hour or more, to exhibit a capacity for the performance of actions of a considerable degree of complexity. The muscular power of the limbs has, however, become enfeebled to a noteworthy extent, and, relatively, much more so in the fore than in the hind limbs. It is, nevertheless, .able to maintain its equilibrium, but sits huddled up, while the legs tend to sprawl, or are planted in unnatural positions. It resists attempts to overthrow its balance, and if ABLATION OF CEREBRAL HEMISPHERES. 9 disturbed regains its former attitude. If the foot or tail be pinched, the animal will bound forward in its characteristic mode of progression, and again settle down when the efffcct of the sti- mulus has worn off. It may shake its ears, slightly change its position, rub its snout with its paws, or scratch its body, and again subside into a condition of perfect quiescence. The pupils contract when a light is thrown into the eya.and the eyelids wink when the conjunctiva is touched. Loud sounds will cause the ears to twitcb, or provoke a sudden start. According to Longet, colocynth placed in the mouth will cause movements of the tongue and organs of m'l&tication, in all respects resembling those of disgust, and efforts to get rid of the nauseous taste. Ammonia held before the nostrils will cause a sudden retraction of the head, or induce the animal to rub its nostrils with its paws. Not merely does it respond by movements to a pinch or prick of its foot or tail, but, if the stimulation be more severe, it will utter repeated and prolonged cries of a plaintive character. All spontaneity seems to be abolished ; but it is usual for the ani- mals, after the period of quiescence has passed, to make appa- rently spontaneous running movements, which, however, are found to depend upon irritation caused by the secondary changes set up in the wound. "Whether after removal of the cerebral hemispheres rabbits and other rodents can see, is a question which has been the subject of lively controversy between Christiani and Munk." Christiani, after careful severance of the hemispheres and corpora striata immediately anterior to the optic thalami, states that he has seen rabbits pass and repass obstacles, such as legs of ch airs and tables, and is of opinion that, though they do not see like normal rabbits, they are still able to guide their movements in accordance with retinal impres- sions. Munk, on the other hand, denies the accuracy of Christiani's experiments, and holds that rabbits, after removal of the cerebral hemispheres, are absolutely blind, and show no indica- tions whatever that they are influenced by light, except as regards the contraction and dilatation of the pupils. He believes that the apparent avoidance of obstacles by Christiani's rabbits was a pure accident, as the obstacles did not happen to lie in their path. The question is one which cannot be said to be definitely settled though the facts mentioned in respect to fishes, frogs, and birds would incline one to believe that Christiani's results and conclu- sionfl may have a solid foundation. On this point, however, and 18 Physiologic des Gehimes, 1885. 10 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. on others relating to the sensory and motor faculties of brainless mammals it is diflacult to arrive at altogether satisfactory con- clusions, as they, unlike the lower vertebrates, have as a rule so speedily succumbed to the operation. Hence, the lower animals' centres have no time to recover from the shock which must neces- sarily ensue from such a violent rupture of the solidarity pre- viously existing between them and the highest centres. As the cause of death in mammals seems largely dependent upon secondary (inflammatory and other) consequences, and not on the mere fact of removal of the hemispheres themselves, it is much to be desired that some method may be discovered whereby the ani- mals may be maintained alive longer than has hitherto been found possible. The nearest approach to this has been attained by Goltz,^'^ who has made a series of careful observations on dogs for prolonged periods, after very extensive destruction of both cere- bral hemispheres. Though the destruction has been far from complete in any case, yet the phenomena described by him teach lessons of the utmost importance in the comparative physiology of the brain. Goltz himself has utilised these experiments as the bases of his polemic against cerebral localisation, but we may, for the time, abstract from their bearing in this direction, and con- sider the facts themselves which he has recorded. Goltz ^^ thus describes a dog in which he had by repeated opera- tions destroyed a large extent of both hemispheres. The amount of primary destruction, together with the secondary atrophy so induced, was so great that the whole brain weighed only 13 drachms instead of 90, which should have been the weight of a normal brain in an animal of the same size. This dog had a pro- foundly demented, expressionless face. Left to itself it wandered about restlessly, paying no attention to what was going on around it. All its movements were awkward and unsteady, but it ex- hibited no complete paralysis. It slipped, however, on a smooth surface, and its legs tended to sprawl from under it, so that it would fall upon its abdomen. From this position it would re- cover itself and again begin its walk. It had the utmost difficulty in feeding itself, though it could find its food when placed in the customary corner of its cage, yet it seemed unable to find it when placed in an unusual position, and even when the food was brought directly under its nose it would snap aimlessly as often outside the dish as in it. It was utterly unable to use its paws 1^ Verrichtungen des GroBshirns, Pfluger's Archiv, 1876-1888. 18 Op. cit., p. 134. GOLTZ'S EXPERIMENTS. 11 for holding and gnawing a bone. It paid no attention to strangers, men or animals ; did not wince at the brightest light suddenly thrown in its eyes, and exhibited no fear at any kind of threat. Though it appeared absolutely blind, yet numerous and varied experiments demonstrated that it was able to guide its movements by sight. It did not run against obstacles as it invariably did when its eyes were blindfolded. It was not deaf, for it could be waked out of sleep by a loud sound, but the character of the sound made no further impression upon it. It did not heed tobacco smoke or chloroform vapour, and would eat a piece of wood as readily as a bone. It did not appear to be influenced by the proximity of another dog. It exhibited no emotion of anger when another stole its food, nor did it express pleasure in the us-ual way by wagging its tail. Its cutaneous sensibility was everywhere diminished, but no part was absolutely without feeling. If its foot was severely pinched it would draw its leg back and bite angrily. The symptoms exhibited by this dog and another similarly operated upon are thus summed up by Goltz : " Both animals were essentially only wandering, eating, and drinking reflex machines. Both were utterly indifferent to man and beast. Both had obtuse- ness of all their senses. Each had sensation in every part of its skin, and effected movements with all its muscles. Neither ex- hibited any expression of pleasure ; on the other hand, both were easily roused to wrath. Both were profoundly demented." The impairment of all the sensory and motor faculties in these and other dogs operated upon by Goltz— in which it is certain that not one of the specific centres was entirely destroyed— would without doubt have been more profound than in rabbits and guinea-pigs had it been possible to extirpate the hemispheres entirely. And when we come to consider the effects of partial cerebral lesions in man, we shall see reason for believing that if in him the whole of the hemispheres were removed, providing this were compatible with life, there would be such complete and enduring paralysis of motion, and annihilation of all the forms of sense, that scarcely a trace would remain to those responsive and adaptive reactions which 8ur\ave the removal of the cerebral hemi- spheres in animals lower in the scale. It thus appears that, notwithstanding the complete extirpation of the cerebral hemispheres, animals, in proportion to their low- ness in the scale, besides duly maintaining and regulating all their organic functions, remain possessed of varied powers which may be classed generally under the heads of equilibration, co-ordina- 12 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. tion of locomotion, emotional expression, and adaptive reactions in accordance with impressions made upon their organs of sense. These are organised in the mesencephalic and spinal centres in the highest degree in fishes, frogs, and pigeons ; to a less degree in the lower mammals, and least of all in monkeys and man. I do not intend on the present occasion to enter on a considera- tion of the respective roles of the spinal, cerebellar, and mesen- cephalic centres in the regulation of these different forms of activity. We may — practically in some and theoretically in all — separate the mesencephalon and spinal cord into a congeries of individual centres, each with its own afferent and efferent nerves, co-ordinating synergic movements, each in its own province, and all co-operating together harmoniously by means of commissural or intracentral fibres. The individual metameres form units in a complex whole, acted on by the nerves of special sense, and sub- ordinate to the supreme nerve centres, through which the adaptation of the organism to its environment is effected. Nor will I enter on a discussion of the vexed question as to whether the actions of the lower centres are indicative or not of intelli- gence. Most of the differences on this point turn mainly on the meaning of terms. If, with Mr. Romanes, we regard fluctuating adaptation to external conditions as the criterion of intelligence, we shall certainly not be able to deny that the actions of the lower centres are indicative of intelligence in this sense. For the observations of Steiner, Schrader, and others on the lower vertebrates, show that forms of activity, which we are accustomed to regard in man as exclusively cerebral, and indicative of con- scious discrimination, are capable of being manifested by these animals in the entire absence of their cerebral hemispheres. Nor can we say that spontaneity, which we have also been accustomed to regard as conditioned by the cerebral hemispheres, is entirely abolished in brainless animals ; for we see that, without any apparent change in external conditions, they move spontaneously, and comport themselves not unlike normal animals. We can, however, in most cases, if not in all, refer these so-called spontaneous movements to immediate ento- or epi-peripheral impressions ; whereas, in normal animals, though their so-called spontaneity is primarily derived from a similar source, the con- nections are more remote and far more difficult to trace. These and other similar facts lead to the conclusion that be- tween the simplest reflex action and the highest act of intelli- gence there is no essential difference— each passing by insensible ADVERSE VIEWS. 13 gradations into the other. We can infer only, we can prove nothing conclusively, regarding the existence of states of consciousness in others than ourselves, and less easily in the case of the lower ani- mals than in man. But we are entitled to say that the activity of the lower centres does not affect the consciousness of the indi- vidual; for, when by lesion of the internal capsule the sensory tracts are cut off from their cortical connections, the individual has absolutely no consciousness of impressions made upon his organs of sense, so that we may conclude that, in man at leant, states of consciousness are indissolubly connected with the activity of the cerebral hemispheres. The results of ablation of the cerebral hemispheres indicate nothing for or against the doctrine of functional localisation, nor do the experiments of Goltz in the least degree militate against the existence of specific centres; for if, even after complete bilateral extirpation of these centres, the functions which survive do not transcend those capable of being manifested in the entire absence of the cerebral hemispheres, there still remains the ques- tion whether the lesions have not caused a loss or paralysis of something of a higher order. That this is so is capable of ample demonstration, of which not the least part has been contributed by the very facts which Goltz himself has ascertained through the numerous and varied devices which he has so ingeniously con- trived. It is no explanation of the defects which admittedly re- sult from removal of the cerebral hemispheres to say that they are caused by a loss of intelligence. This is merely restating the facts in a more metaphysical but less intelligible form. We are not, however, dealing with metaphysical terms when we are studying the effects of lesions of the cerebral cortex. We are dealing with material entities connected with sensory and motor tracts, and it is our object to determine, if possible, what are the anatomical and physiological factors which are co-related with the functions which we generalise under the head of intelligence ; and there appears to be nothing which can, a priori, be urged against the notion that the various factors of intelligence have their sub- strata in definite regions specifically related to certain motor and sensory functions. Flourens, as is well known, denied every spe- cies of localisation in the cerebral hemispheres. To this conclu- sion he appears to have been led not more by his own experi- ments than by the prevalent conceptions as to the unity and in- divisibility of the mind, and as a reaction against the organology of Gall and his followers. To Gall, however, let us in passing pay 14 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. the tribute that in his analysis he followed strictly inductive methods, and made many observations of enduring value ; though his synthesis of the brain as a congeries of separate organs, each autonomous in its own sphere, and all mysteriously inherent in some unifying, immaterial substratum, has failed to commend itself to the scientific world. Flourens thus sums up his conclu- sions ; — " Thus one may remove, anteriorly, or posteriorly, from above, or from the side, a considerable portion of the cerebral lobes without destroying their functions. Even a small portion of these lobes, therefore, suffices for the exercise of their functions. In propor- tion to the extent of the removal, all the functions become im- paired, and gradually fail ; and beyond certain limits they are altogether annihilated. The cerebral lobes, therefore, co-operate as a whole in the full and complete exercise of their functions. Finally, when one form of perception is lost, ail are lost ; when one faculty disappears, all disappear. There are, therefore, no special seats either of special faculties or special perceptions. The faculty of perceiving, judging, and willing one thing resides in the same region as that of perceiving, judging, and willing another ; consequently, this faculty, essentially one, resides essentially in one organ."^^ Though the doctrines of Flourens met with general acceptation, they were contested on experimental grounds by some physiolo- gists, more particularly by Bouillaud.^" The experiments of Bouillaud on pigeons, dog^, and rabbits led him to conclude that destruction of the anterior lobes alone caused symptoms of pro- found dementia. Though the animals were able to feel, see, hear, smell, and to execute a number of spontaneous and instinctive movements, they were unable to recognise their relations to the objects by which they were surrounded. They were unable to feed themselves, and had in general lost all reasoning powers. An animal, said he, in which the anterior lobes have been destroyed, " though deprived of the exercise of a more or less considerable number of intellectual acts, continues to enjoy its sensory facul- ties; a proof that 'sensation' and ' intellection ' are not one and the same function, and that they have separate localities." Bouil- laud's results have, I think, received confirmation and elucidation from my own experiments on monkeys, as well as those of Goltz 19 Op. cit., p. 99. ^ "Rech. Slxperim. sur les Fonctions du Cerveau, et sur celles de sa portion anterieure en particulier." Journ. de Physiol. Expirim., 1830, T. x, p. 91. BOUILLA rD—BROCA—HUGRLINGS-JACKSON. 15 and Schrader on dogs and pigeons. Bouillaud, however, did not consider that his own experiments had done more than merely raise the question of localisation, and it was generally believed that, so far at least as experimental data were concerned, the doc- trine of specific localisation had no secure basis of support. From the clinical standpoint, however, facts were continually being pre- sented which seemed altogether unintelligible except on some theory of localisation; and clinical observers, such as Bouillaud himself, Andral, and others, wisely suspended their judgment until further facts should be brought to light, which might serve to explain the apparent irreconcilable discrepancy between human pathology and experimental physiology. Bouillaud '^ recorded certain clinical facts which seemed to indi- cate a connection between lesions of the anterior lobes and loss of speech, thus affording some confirmation of the theories of Gall on the subject. Dax (1836) established the special relation of aphasia to right hemiplegia and lesions of the left hemisphere ; but the connection between aphemia, or aphasia, and lesion more particularly of a definite region of the left hemisphere, namely, the base of the third frontal convolution, was first pointed out by Broca (1861). Broca's observations have since been amply con- firmed by clinical and pathological research, and further eluci- dated by physiological experiment. The next great advance in cerebral localisation was made by Hughlings-Jackson (1861),-^ who, from a study of the forms of epilepsy, now appropriately known by his name, furnished cogent reasons for believing that certain convolutions near, and function- ally related to, the corpus striatum had a direct motor significa- tion. By irritation or " discharging lesions " of these convolu- tions, localised, or general unilateral convulsions of the opposite side of the body were induced. Omng, however, to the fact, as Hughlings-Jackson has remarked, that " the damage by disease is often coarse, ill-defined, and widespread," the determination of the functions of the brain by the clinico-pathological method had made comparatively little progress, there being apparently no constant uniformity between the seat of the disease and the sym- ptoms manifested. The difficulty of discriminating between the direct and indirect effects of cerebral lesions has furnished Brown- S6quard^^ with arguments in favour of his peculiar views, that all *i Archives de Medecine, 1825. 22 Clinical and Pathological liesearches on the Nervous System. ** Physiological Pathology of the Brain, Lanzet, 1876, and Archives de Physi- ologic, 1877-1890. 16 CEREB RAL LOCALISA TION. the symptoms of cerebral disease are due to some dynamic in- fluence exercised by the lesion on parts situated at a distance (and always apparently out of reach), which are credited with the functions lost or otherwise disturbed. A glance at the accompanying diagram (Fig. 2) founded by Exner^^ on the examination of a number of cases of lesion of the left hemisphere, will show you the extraordinary diversity in posi- OPPeR' £KTBI£mTY» O ^^V^^^ EXTBBMITY. m FAGIAL MUSCLl^S, ® HYPDGLOSSUS MUSCLES.® SPEECH^ © SlCHr. S Fig. 2. — After Bxner's Tafel xxv. The diagram is marked with larger and smaller circles of the same order. The larger circles indicate the absolute centres, the smaller the relative centres. The in- tensity of the latter is indicated by the closeness of the circles to each other. tion of those accompanied by practically the same symptom. It will be seen, for instance, that though the lesions which cause affection of the upper extremity are mostly grouped in a certain region, yet there is scarcely a point on the convexity of the hemi- sphere lesion of which has not caused a similar result. These and 2* Localisation der Functionen, in der Grosshirnrinde des Menschen, 1881. FBITSCn AND HITZIG'S EXPERIMENrS. 17 such like are the data on which Exner has founded his theory of absolute and relative centres ; absolute centres being those de- struction of which invariably, relative centres being those de- struction of which only frequently, induces the same symptom. The distinction appears to me to have no valid foundation. Mere frequency is not a sufficient basis on which to found causal rela- tionship. For, if the so-called relative centres can be, and have been times out of number, destroyed without any disturbance of the function with which they are supposed to be related, and if the said f auction can be annihilated while the relative centres are intact, it is obvious that the relationship is nothing more than mere coincidence or juxtaposition. Fig. 3.— Centres of the brain of the dog according to Fritsch and Hitzig. The whole aspect of cerebral physiology and pathology was re- volutionised by the discovery, first made by Fritsch and Hiizig in 1870,-' that certain definite movements could be excited by the direct application of electrical stimulation to definite regions of the cortex cerebri in dogs. As these experiments are now of historic interest, I extract the accompanying figure (Fig. 3) and the de- scription, in their own words, of the facts which they had at that time ascertained. " The centre for the neck-muscles (Fig .3 a) lies in the lateral part of the prefrontal gyrus at the point where the surface of this convolution abruptly descends. The outermost extremity of the 2' Reichert, u. l>u Boix-Reymmid'n Archiv, 1870, Ueft 3. 18 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. postfrontal gyrus contains, in the neighbourhood of the lateral end of the frontal fissure (Fig. 3 b) the centre for the ex- tensors and abductors of the fore limb." Somewhat behind the same, and nearer the coronal fissure (Fig. 3 c) lie the ruling centres for the flexion and rotation of the limb. The centre for the hind leg (Fig. 3 d) is also found in the postfrontal gyrus, but nearer the middle line than that of the fore leg, and somewhat further back. The facial (Fig. 3 e) is innervated from the middle part of the super-Sylvian gyrus. This region generally has an extension of over 0.5 centimetre, and stretches before and behind the bend over the Sylvian fissure. We must add that we did not always succeed in getting the neck- muscles in action from the first mentioned point. The muscles of the back, tail, and abdomen we have often enough excited to con- traction from points lying between those marked, but no circum- scribed point from which they could be individually stimulated could be satisfactorily determined. The whole of the convexity lying behind the facial centre we found absolutely unexcitable, even with altogether disproportionate intensity of current." The subject of the electrical excitability of the cortex and its signification was next taken up by myself in 1873,^'' more particu- larly with the object of putting to experimental proof the views of Hughlings Jackson in reference to the causation of unilateral epileptiform convulsions. While amply confirming these doctrines in all essential particulars, my attention became specially directed to the question of definite localisation, and I was led minutely to explore, not only the hemispheres of dogs, but also those of mon- keys and various other orders of vertebrates. Similar researches have been undertaken and published in almost every country, and by experimenters too numerous to mention, but nowhere with greater care and detail than by Beevor, Horsley, and Schafer ^' in our own. The facts revealed by electrical exploration of the hemispheres have been, and still are, the subject of considerable diversity of opinion, and by some, as Brown-Sequard,-^ are re- garded as of no greater significance than the contortions which may be induced by tickling the sole of the foot. There cannot, however, be a doubt that from them, and the further experiments to which they have pointed the way, has sprung the whole modern doctrine of exact cerebral localisation. 26 Experimental Researches in Cerebral Physiology and Pathology, West Hiding Lunatic Asylum Reports, vol. iii, 1873. 27 Phil. Trans., 1888. 28 Archives de Physiologie, January, 1890. EXCITABILITY OF BRAIN. 19 Before discussing the different specific reactions and their func- tional significance, it will be desirable to enter on a brief considera- tion of the characters and conditions of the excitability of the cerebral cortex. In normal states the grey matter of the cortex is entirely or almost entirely, insensible to mechanical stimulation. Luciani, however, states that though the convexity of the hemisphere does not react to this form of stimulation, yet he has been able to produce movements of the opposite limbs by irritation of the walls of the crucial sulcus. Gouty-'' also states that he has found the convolutions mechanically excitable after ligature of the cerebral arteries. Whether we accept these statements as being strictly accurate or not, it is certain, as was shown by Franck and Pitres,^" that when the cortex has become inflamed and congested by ex- posure or traumatic lesion, it becomes irritable to mechanical stimulation, and may respond not merely by partial movements of the opposite limbs, but also by a unilateral epileptic fit. This is, in fact, the experimental induction of the discharging lesions described by Hughlings Jackson. It is also held by some— for example, Landois"— that the cortex is chemically excitable: a fact, however, which may be due to the inflammatory condition of the tissues thereby induced. The most effective excitant is the application, by closely approximated electrodes, of a galvanic or faradic current of moderate intensity. Fritsch and Hitzig, in their researches, employed the former, but preference has gene- rally been given by other experimenters to the faradic current as being the best calculated to elicit the characteristic reactions of the cortical centres. When an animal is sufficiently narcotised to abolish all restless or spontaneous movements— and the ana3s- thesia must not be too profound, otherwise all reactions cease— the application of the electrodes to different regions calls forth definite motor reactions with such uniformity that, when once the limits of the said region have been accurately defined, one may confidently predict the exact movement which will occur in animals of the same species. This is a fact which is beyond all dispute, and has been frequently demonstrated by myself, Ilorsley, and others, and, indeed, may be regarded as an ordinary lecture experiment. Couty^^ is perhaps the only physiologist whose results appear 28 Comptes liendus, March, 1879. 3" Archives de Physioloijie, 1883. '1 Abstract in Nmi,rolo(j. Centralblatt, IS'PO. p. Hf,. '2 Le Cerveau Moteur, Archives de I hysioloyie, 1883. c2 20 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. to contradict the above statement ; but as his experiments were performed on animals not narcotised, it is probable that any ir- regularity in the effects of excitation was due to spontaneous movements on the part of the animal. Some variations from ab- solute uniformity may, however, occur from want of symmetry in the convolutions, and still more from changes in the excitability of the cortex. These are particularly apt to occur after repeated exploration, so that a mixture of effects may be produced by dif- fusion of the current from the one centre into others which have been rendered hyperexcitable by previous stimulation. The lateral diffusion of the current, which always occurs more or less, is the chief obstacle to the precise delimitation of the cortical centres by the method of excitation. Hence the limits of a region may be somewhat differently given by different experimenters ; but, making due allowance for all these sources of error, it has been found possible to arrive at a remarkable degree of harmony as to the locality and extent of the respective areas. The extrapolar diffusion of current which can be demonstrated in the brain, as in other animal tissues, has been regarded by Dupuy^^ as an in- superable objection to the theory that the results of application of the electrodes to the cortex are due to stimulation of the cortex itself ; and attempts are made to explain them away by mere physical conduction of the currents to centres and tracts at the base of the brain. But no satisfactory explanation can thus be afforded of the manifest differences in reaction which follow the application of the electrodes to regions in close proximity to each other, nor of the total absence of reaction when the electrodes are placed on the island of Reil, which is nearer the base of the brain than other regions which act uniformly and without fail. The chief objection to the direct excitability of the cottex itself is found in the fact that, even after removal of the cortex, similar reactions are still obtainable when the electrodes are placed on the subjacent medullary fibres, This was first pointed out by Burdon-Sanderson,^* and has been confirmed by all subsequent experimenters. After removal of the cortex, however, the medul- lary fibres lose their excitability, like motor nerves separated from the anterior cornua of the spinal cord, so that, after a lapse of four days, no reactions can be produced by the strongest stimulation. This fact completely disposes of the physical- ss Examen de quelques Points de la Physiologie du Cerveaw, 1873. 34 Proceedings Royal Society, June, 1874'. EXCITABILITY OF BRAIX. 21 conduction-to-the-base-of-the-brain hypothesis. It has thus been satisfactorily established that the cones of medullary fibres, cor- responding to the respective cortical centres, are functionally differentiated like the cortical centres themselves, and, as has EYES OP: EYES T: MOUTH OP: HEAD T; TONGUE MOUTH REti SHOULDER ELBOW WRIST FINGERS THUMB TRUNK HIP ANKLE KNEE HALLUX roEs Fig. 4.— Arrangement of the motor fibres of the internal capsule, according to Beevor and Horsley. been shown by Franck and Pitres,^' and more recently, with greater detail, by Beevor and Horsley,^* maintain their individu- »* Complex fiendus de la Society Bioloff., 1877. 3« Proceedings Royal SocieUj, No. 286, 1890. 22 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. ality, and are echeloned in definite and regular order in the internal capsule. On the accompanying figure (Fig. 4), kindly supplied me by Dr. Beevor, are marked the points on the internal capsule from which, according to their recent researches, minimal stimulation excites the respective movements which are indi- cated on the margin. But it does not follow, because the medul- lary fibres are excitable, that the corresponding cortical regions are unexcitable, and that the current merely passes through them. It is a priori more likely that there is also functional differentiation of the cortical centres to which they are distributed, and that the grey matter is, under normal conditions, the natural excitant of the reactions which we are able to produce by artificial stimula- tion with the electric current. And a comparison of the respec- tive reactions of the cortex and medullary fibres indicates such differences as can only be explained on the supposition that the cortical centres are themselves excitable. First, as regards the relative excitability of the grey matter and subjacent medullary fibres. This is a point on which there are some differences of opinion, but Putnam found ^'^ the medullary fibres less excitable than the cortex, so that in order to produce the customary reaction, it was necessary to use a much stronger current than before. This has been confirmed by Franck and Pitres, who have further shown that the diminished excitability cannot be accounted for by mere shock or haemorrhage, inasmuch as the neighbouring grey matter acted as readily as before. They have further given reasons for believing that the contrary results obtained by Eichet,^^ and Bubnoff and Heidenhain ^^ are due to the action on the cortex of the chloral and morphine under which their experiments were performed. These agents, without doubt, paralyse the excitability of the grey matter. It was noted by Fritsch and Hitzig, in their experiments, that the anodal closure was a more effective stimulus than the cathodal — a fact which might be interpreted as signifying that the real stimulus proceeded from the virtual cathode in the deeper layers of the cortex, or termination of the medullary fibres. This, however, has been ebown by Gerber,*° not to be uniformly 3T Soston Med. and Surg. Journal, 1874. 38 Sur les Circonvolutions Cerebrales, 1879. 39 Pfliiger's Archiv.f. Physiologic, 1881. " Beitrage zur Lehre von der electrisctien Eeizung des G-rosshirns," Pflugers' Archivfur Physiologie, Band 39, 1888. EXCITABILITY OF BRAIN. 23 the case. Gerber finds that when the cortex is in a normal state the cathode is the more effective stimulant, but that when changes have occurred from long exposure the anode predominates. These experiments would, therefore, indicate that in the normal condi- tion of the brain the laws of galvanic excitability are the same as for motor nerves. Another important difference between the reactions of the cor- tex and the subjacent medullary fibres, which was first pointed out by Franck and Pitres, is that the time lost between the ap- plication of the stimulus and the occurrence of muscular contrac- tion is much greater in the case of the former than the latter. This interval, after deducting the time necessary for the trans- mission of the impulse through the spinal cord and motor nerves, indicates a retardation in the cortex of 0.045 second. After re- moval of the grey matter and application of the electrodes to the medullary fibres, the period of retardation diminishes to 0.030 second, that is, about one-third less, and this difference is put at a considerably higher figure by Bubnoff and Heidenhain. The signification of this fact is that the grey matter of the cor- tex does not behave like an inert layer, which merely allows trans- mission of the electric current to the medullary fibres, but, like other nerve centres, stores up and transforms the stimuli which it has received into its own energy. There is also a characteristic difference between the muscular curves registered on stimulation of the cortex and medullary fibres respectively. In the latter case the curve rises abruptly, and is of short duration ; while in the former it rises more gradu- ally, is more prolonged, and frequently marked by the occurrence of a secondary tetanus, which latter is altogether peculiar to the cortex, and is never seen when the medullary fibres alone are stimulated. The cortex is apt, after repeated stimulation, or after the receipt of a succession of stimuli each insufficient to produce reaction, to respond by tonic, followed by clonic, spasms of the correlated muscles of a truly epileptic type. These convulsions tend to spread and become generalised in the order and sequence originally described by Hughlings Jackson. They never occur on stimulation of the medullary fibres alone, apart from the inter- vention of the grey matter of the cortex on the one side or the other, and cannot be produced if the cortical centres are entirely destroyed on both sides. The duration of the effects of stimula- tion of the medullary fibres is strictly proportional to that of the stimulus which is applied to them. We shall also see as we pro- 24 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. ceed that the effects of localised destruction of the cortex are the counterpart of those of irritation, however induced, and we may from this conclude that there is the same functional differentia- tion in the cortex as in the medullary fibres, even if the facts which I have just mentioned should not be regarded as of them- selves completely establishing this proposition. LECTUKE II LECTURE II. Mb. Pbesident and Gentlemen, — I will now invite your at- tention to a brief consideration of the phenomena of electrical irritation of the brain of the monkey, more especially as deter- mined by my own experiments, and those of Horsley, Schafer and Beevor, which, though in all essentials confirming mine, have been worked out with more elaborate detail and minuteness.^ Beginning anteriorly we find that what is generally termed the prefrontal lobe— that is, all in advance of a line drawn at right angles to the anterior extremity of the precentral sulcus— gives no, or very doubtful, response to electrical stimulation. Between this line and that of the precentral sulcus continued upwards to the longitudinal fissure, there is a region or area (1, 2, Fig. 5 ; Figs. 6 and 7, head), stimulation of which causes open- ing of the eyes, dilatation of the pupils, and movements of the head and eyes to the opposite side. This area has been further differentiated by Beevor and Horsley, according to the primary movements which result from minimal stimulation of the points indicated on their diagram (Fig. 8). The corresponding region in the brain of the dog is (12, Fig. 9). No similarly differentiated centre is seen in the cat (Fig. 10) or rabbit (Fig. 11). At the upper extremity of the central convolutions (ascending frontal, ascending parietal, and postero- parietal lobule) (1, 2, Fig. 5; leg, Figs. 6 and 7), and extending over the margin of the hemi- sphere into the posterior part of the marginal convolution, or paracentral lobule, electrical stimulation causes movements of the lower e:ctremity. The movements vary according to the position of the electrodes on this area. Behind the fissure of Rolando the movements are chiefly, or exclusively, of the foot or toes. Anterior to the fissure of Rolando they are combined with flexion of the 1 Horsley and Schafer, PAii. Tram., B. 20, 1888; Beevor and Horsley, Phil. Tram., B. 1890. 28 CEREBRAL L CALLS A TION. leg and thigh. With minimal stimulation the movements may be still further differentiated (Fig. 8), and, in particular, the great toe can be excited to movement separately by stimulation at the upper extremity of the fissure of Rolando. The corresponding region in the brain of the dog, cat, and rabbit, is indicated by 1, Figs. 9, 10, 11. Fig. 5. — The left hemisphere of the monkey. 1. The opposite hind limb is advanced as in walking ; 2, flexion with outward rotation of the thigh, rotation inwards of the leg. with flexion of the toes ; 3, the tail ; 4, the opposite arm is adducted, extended, and retracted, the hand pronated ; 5, extension forwards of the opposite arm ; a, b, c, d, movements of fingers and wrist ; 6, flexion and supination of the forearm ; 7, retrac- tion and elevation of the angle of the mouth ; 8, elevation of the ala of the nose and upper lip ; 9 and 10, opening of the mouth, with protru- sion (9) and retraction (10) of the tongue ; 11, retraction of the angle of the mouth ; 12, the eyes open widely, the pupils dilate, and head and eyes turn to the opposite side ; 13 and 13', the eyes move to the opposite side ; 14, pricking of the opposite ear, head and eyes turn to the opposite side, pupils dilate widely. Below the leg area, and partly in front of it, and occupying the middle third, or rather two-fourths of the central convolutions, there is a region stimulation of which causes movements of the upper extremity (3, 4, 5, 6, a, b, c, d, Fig. 5, and arm, Fig. 6), In this area it is possible to differentiate, more or less completely, movements of the upper arm (protraction and retraction) ; move- ments of the forearm (flexion, supination, etc.) ; and of the wrist, fingers and thumb. The proximal movements are represented most in the upper part of this region ; the distal movements, that is, those of the fingers and thumb, most at the lower part. By minimal stimulation at the lower extremity of the intra- parietal sulcus the thumb may be individually thrown into the action (Fig. 8). The corresponding region in the brain of the dog is that indicated by the numerals 4 and 5 situated on the post- ELECTRICAL REACTIONS. 29 crucial division of the sigmoid gyrus (Fig. 9), and by the same numerals on the brain of the cat (Fig. 10), together with a situ- ated on the anterior extremity of the second external convolution. Stimulation of this latter point causes protrusion of the claws ; an action comparable to the movements of the wrist and fingers excited from the lower part of the ascending parietal convolution in the monkey. The corresponding region in the brain of the rabbit is indicated by the same numerals (4, 5, Fig. 11). Below the arm area, and occupying the lower third of the central convolutions, there is a region stimulation of which causes movements of the face, mouth and tongue. In the upper part of this area can be differentiated centres for movements of the upper facial muscles (7, 8, Fig. 5) in front of, and platysma (11) behind the fissure of Rolando. The corresponding region in the brain of the dog, relatively much larger than in the monkey, is indicated by the numerals (7, 8, Fig. 9), and the same indicate the homolo- gous regions in the brain of the cat (Fig. 10), and rabbit (Fig. 11). In the lower portion excitation causes movements of the mouth and tongue ; protrusion of the tongue being generally caused by stimulation anteriorly (9, Fig. 5), and retraction by stimulation posteriorly (10, Fig 5). It has further been demonstrated by Semon and Horsley ^ that excitation of the lower extremity of the ascending frontal con- volution causes phonatory closure of the vocal cords. The phona- tory closure of the vocal cords was first demonstrated ocularly in the dog, on irritation of the pre-sigmoid region, by Krause,^ though I had many years previously,* given audible demonstration of the same fact by showing that stimulation in this neighbourhood not infrequently caused barking ; and similar effects (spitting, mew- ing) by stimulation of the homologous region in the brain of the cat. I also pointed out that the movements occurring on stimu- lation of this part were distinctly bilateral, an effect which Krause, Horsley and Semon, have found to be true also of move- ments of the vocal cords. The areas for the head and eyes, arm and leg, extend over the margin of the hemisphere into the mesial aspect or marginal convolution. These I had to some extent noted in my first ex- periments, but a more thorough exploration of the reactions of this * On the Central Motor Innervation of the Larynx, Brittsh Mkdical Journal, December 2l8t, 1889. » Plluger'i Arctiiv., 1883. * Wtit Hiding Asylum. Reports, 1873. 30 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. region was first made by Horsley and Schafer.® Excitation of this convolution from before backwards (see Fig. 7), causes movements of the spine, tail, and pelvis ; behind these, extension of the hip, flexion of the leg, and lastly,^ movements of the foot and toes. These movements are not, however, always clearly differentiated, as they are apt to run into each other, and to be complicated by secondary movements of the various segments of the limb. Fig. 6. Stimulation of the angular gyms, pit courbe (13' 13, Fig. 5), causes movements of the eyeballs, and occasionally of the head, to the opposite side, generally combined with an upward or downward direction, according as the electrodes are on the anterior or posterior limb of this gyrus. The condition of the pupils is not constant, occasionally they are contracted. The corresponding region in the brain of the dog is indicated by 13 (Fig. 9), situated on the second external convolution, and the homologous region in the brain of the cat (Fig. 10), and the rabbit (Fig. 11), is indicated by the same numerals. 5 Phil. Trans., vol. 179, ELECTRICAL BE A CTIONS. 31 Excitation of the occipital lobe appeared in my earlier experiment s to yield negative results. But Luciani and Tamburini * occasionally obtained movements of the eyeballs similar to those occur- ring on excitation of the angular gyrus, though less marked And Schafer ^ describes similar movements as occurring from stimulation of different parts of the occipital lobe and neigh- bouring regions. My own experiments on several monkeys, though not opposed to those of Schafer, are more in harmony Fig. 7. — The motor areas according to Horsley and Schafer, with those of Luciani and Tamburini, and show that, though movements of the eyeballs may be obtained by excitation of the occipital lobe, they are, as a rule, less constant and less easily excited than from stimulation of the angular gyrus. Stimulation of the superior temporal gj'rus (14, Fig. 5) causes pricking of the opposite ear, opening of the eyes, dilatation of the pupils, and direction of the head and eyes to the opposite side. Precisely the same reaction occurs after stimulation of the poste- rior limb of the third external convolution of the brain of the dog ' Sui Centri Paico-Senfori Corticali, 1879. 1 Proc. Roy. Hoc, 1888. 32 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. ELECTRICAL HE ACTIO XS. 33 (14, Fig. 9), and so also in the brain of the cat (Fig. 10), and homologous region of the brain ofthe rabbit (Fig. 11), Sometimes only moTements of the ear are caused, and sometimes the animal attempts to bound off the table as if suddenly startled. Stimulation of the hippocampal lobule or anterior extremity of the hippocampal gyrus in monkeys, dogs, cats, and rabbits causes precisely the same results — namely, torsion of the nostril on the same side — as if from irritation applied directly to the nostril itself. Irritation of the gyrus hippocampi occasionally caused movements such as might be conditioned by direct irrita- tion of the opposite limbs ; but beyond this I have not been able Pig. 9. — Left hemisphere of the brain of dog. 1. The opposite limb is advanced ; 3, lateral or wagging motion of the tail ; 4, retraction with adduction of the opposite fore limb ; b, elevation of shoulder, and exten- sion forwards of the opposite fore limb ; +, flexion of the paw ; 7, action of the orbicularis oculi and zygomatics ; 8, retraction and elevation of the opposite angle of the mouth ; 9, opening of the mouth and move- ments of the tongue ; 11, retraction of the angle of the mouth ; 12, the eyes widely opened with dilatation of the pupils, with movement of the eyeballs and head to the opposite side ; 1.3, movement of the eyeballs to the opposite side ; 14, pricking, or sudden retraction, of the opposite ear ; 15, torsion of the nostril on the same side. to obtain any constant reaction from stimulation of the rest of the temporal lobe or other portions of the cortex. Such is briefly a summary of the phenomena of electrical irrita- tion of the different regions of the cerebral cortex. These results, apart from the interpretation which we put upon them, indicate some form of functional differentiation ; and it is obvious, on com- paring the corresponding areas in the brain of the monkey, dog, cat, and rabbit, that there are great differences as regards their relative extent, and the character of* the movements with which they are in relation. Whether complete parallelism obtains D 34 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. between the brain of the monkey and the brain of man is a question which, until recently, could only be answered by reference to the facts of localised lesions. Bartholow * and Sciamanna ^ had observed movements of the opposite side of the body on stimulation of the cortex through the dura mater— the former in a case of cancerous ulceration and the latter in a case of tre- phining. But their results, though so far in accordance with those of experimentation on monkeys, were lacking in precision. Recently, however, surgeons have on several occasions resorted to gentle faradisation of the cortex, in order to define accurately the regions which they have desired to extirpate for the cure of focal jam Fig. 10. — Left hemisphere of the brain of the cat. 1. Advance of the oppo- site hind limb ; 4, retraction and adduction of the opposite foreleg ; 5, elevation of the shoulder, with flexion of the forearm end paw ; A, clutching or grasping action of the paw, with protrusion of the claws ; 7, elevation of the angle of the mouth and cheek, with closure of the eye ; 8, retraction, with some degree of elevation of the angle of the mouth, and drawing downward and forward of the ear ; 9, opening of the mouth and movements of the tongue ; 13, the eyeballs move to the opposite side ; 14, pricking of the ear, and head and eyes turn to the opposite side ; 15, elevation of the lip and torsion of the nostril on the same side ; divergence of the lips. epilepsy. One of these has been reported by Horsley, and several others have been quoted by Mills in his valuable memoir on Cerebral Localisation in its Practical Eelations.^" In one case the lower halves of the two central convolutions — the posterior extremity of the second frontal and the posterior superior corner of the third frontal convolution — were exposed in the left hemi- sphere. "Careful examinations were made with the faradic current applied to the cortex with the view of locating the proper centres for excision. Four distinct responses in the shape of 8 Amer. Journ. Med. Sciences, April, 1874. 9 Arch, di Psichiatria, 1882. 10 Read before the Washington Congress, September 19tb, : JBrain, 1889. !; reprinted in ELECTRICAL REACTIONS. .35 definite movements were obtained after several trials ; these were (1) in the most anterior position at which movements resulted, distinct conjugate deviation of the head to the opposite side; (2) a little below and behind this point, drawing of the mouth outwards and upwards ; (3) above this spot for movements of the angle of the mouth, about half an inch, extension of the wrist and fingers was produced ; (4) behind and above the latter point, distinct flexion of the fingers and wrist. Continuing and increas- ing the faradic application at this last determined point, the fingers, thumb, wrist, and forearm were successively flexed, and the whole extremity assumed the ' wing-like ' position. The order of events, according to three persons who were present, and who observed the patient's spasms, being exactly that which had been noticed at the beginning of his convulsive seizures." Fig. 11. — Left hemisphere of the brain of rabbit. 1. Advance of the oppo- site hind leg; 4, retraction with adduction of the opposite fore limb ; 5, ele- vation of the shoulder and extension forward of the fore limb ; 7, retrac- tion and elevation of the angle of the mouth ; 8, closure of the opposite eye; 9, opening of the mouth, with movements of the tongue ; 1.3, for- ward movement of the opposite eye, occasionally turning of the head to the opposite side ; 14, sudden retraction and elevation or pricking of the opposite ear ; 1.5, torsion or closure of the nostril. In a second case reported by Keen:" " On touching the cortex with the electrodes at a position which apparently corresponded to the anterior portion of the pre-Rolandic convolution, just be- hind the precentral fissure, movements of the wrist and fingers were produced. The hand moved in extension in the mid-line and to the ulnar side at different touches, the fingers being extended and separated. Above the region in which these movements were obtained application of the current caused movement of the left elbow, both flexion and extension, and of the shoulder, which was raised and abducted. Below the region, where the hand move- ments were excited, the application of the current produced an upward movement of the whole of the left face." These results correspond very closely with the position of the various centres as already defined. " Amer. Jaum. Med. Scitnces, November, 1888. d2 36 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. In another case, reported by Lloyd and Deaver,^^ an area was exposed in the right hemisphere corresponding to the junction of the middle and lower thirds of the central convolutions. When the electrodes were applied to a point just posterior to the fissure of Eolando the movements which occurred were in order — flexion of the thumb on the palm, flexion of the flngers, flexion of the wrist, extending to flexion of the elbow. At a point in front and below stimulation caused contraction of the facial muscles of the oppo- site side. In a fourth case, reported by Nancrede,^^ movements of the thumb were induced by stimulation of a region corresponding to the second lower fourth of the ascending parietal convolution. All these results are in close harmony with those obtained on stimulation of the cortex of the brain of the monkey, and we have therefore every reason to believe that, cceteris paribus, the func- tional relations of the human cortex are identical with those of the lower animals. So far as the excitation method is concerned, we are entitled to say that, whether the individual segments of a limb are separately localised, or are represented, more or less, throughout a common area, the areas as a whole are completely differentiated from each other. No movements of the leg result from irritation of the facial centres, nor of the face from the leg centres. The face area and leg area are thus entirely differentiated from each other, and from the oculo-motor area. What is true of centres widely apart is doubtless true of centres which are in close proximity to each other. The fact that stimulation of the margin of a given area is apt to produce joint movements of this and the adjoining area must not be taken to imply that this portion subserves conjoint functions — say of the arm and leg, or arm and face. The true explanation appears to me to be that the excitation method is unable completely to differentiate the boundaries of the respective centres. Eegions which are in the closest proximity to each other, anatomically and functionally, are apt to be discharged together by diffusion of the stimulus. Nor, even if we are unable to entirely dissociate the centres from each other by the destruc- tive method, are we on this ground entitled to conclude that there is any functional fusion between the two ; for a destructive lesion, however small, situated on the margin of any given centre, is cal- culated to affect the functions of more than one. Facts will be 12 Amer. Journ. Med. Sciences, November, 1888. 13 Medical News, November 24th, 1888. ELECTRICAL REACTIONS. 37 adduced as we proceed which to my mind justify the conclusion that the areas as a whole are as completely differentiated from each other as the limbs themselves, or one organ of sense from another. We have seen, however, in respect to the individual movements of a limb, that though one particular movement can frequently be isolated by minimal stimulation of a definite point within the general area, yet the same movement may occur along with others when another part of the area is uuder stimulation. This may be interpreted either on the supposition that the particular move- ment, say of the thumb, is represented throughout the whole of the arm area, or that it is only a case of diffusion of the stimulus from one part to another. It is difficult to decide which of these views is the correct one, and it may be that neither accurately represents the whole truth. For the reactions of the limbs which result from stimulation of the cortex are not mere muscular con- tractions, but synergic movements co-ordinated into acts; and inasmuch as has been shown by Professor Yeo and myself," the same muscles or muscular groups enter into the composition of the different movements innervated by the respective motor roots of the brachial and crural plexuses, so the same muscular groups may have a multiple representation in the various sub- diTisions of the general area. And it would appear that in the cortical areas there is a much greater differentiation than in the respective segments of the brachial and crural enlargements of the spinal cord. But in my opinion any further multiple repre- sentation outside the general area of a limb is altogether opposed to the facts of localisation as determined either by the methods of excitation, or destruction, or both. We have next to inquire into the important and much disputed question as to the signification of the motor reactions which result from electrical stimulation of the different cortical regions. Though many of the movements are evidently such as may be termed purposive, it does not follow that they are indicative of direct stimulation of motor regions in the strict sense of the term, for the movements may be the result of some psychical condition incapable of being expressed in physiological terms ; or they may be reflex, and thereby not differing essentially from those result- ing from peripheral stimulation ; or they may be motor in the sense of being due to irritation of parts in direct connection with i* pToe. Hoy. Soc, 1881, The Functional Relations of the Motor Bpote of tlj^ Brachial and Lumbo saural Plexuses. 38 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. the motor tracts and motor nerves, or they may be partly one and partly the other. The method of excitation itself is not compe- tent to solve these questions, and requires as a complement the strictly localised destruction of those areas, stimulation of which gives rise to definite motor reactions. A careful consideration of the reactions in different orders of animals, and the fact that similar movements are in some cases excitable from different cortical regions, led me to believe that they might have various significations, and I formed the hypothe- sis that some might be due to stimulation of motor regions proper, while others might be looked upon as the associated expression of subjective sensation. On this hypothesis I instituted localised destructive experiments, and thus determined the existence of sensory or perceptive centres respectively related to the different forms of sensibility, as well as of centres more especially, if not exclusively, motor in character. The existence of distinct sensory centres has been confirmed by succeeding physiological and clinical research, and I have the satisfaction of thinking that such errors as I have committed in the delimitation of the various sensory regions have been errors more of omission than of com- mission, and that the localities in which I originally fixed the respective sensory areas correspond in part at least with the posi- tion assigned to them by the most reliable experimental and clinical methods. The Visual Centres. — I will first call your attention to the re- actions occurring on stimulation of the occipito-angular region in monkeys, and its homologue in the lower orders of animals. The reactions, as we have already seen, are movements of the eyeballs, and occasionally of the head to the opposite side ; and frequently also of the pupils, not always uniform in character, being some- times contraction, at other times dilatation. These movements I have found to be most easily and most uniformly excited from the anterior and posterior limbs of the angular gyrus. As a rule, along with the lateral movements there is upward direction when the anterior limb, and downward when the posterior limb of this gyrus is excited. Movements of the eyeballs are also obtainable, as Luciani and Tamburini first pointed out, from irritation of the occipital lobe. Schafer, who omits the anterior limb of the angular gyrus, though I have found this as excitable as the rest, obtains downward movements of the eyes on stimulation, not only of the posterior limb of the angular gyrus, but also of the upper end of the middle temporal gyrus, that part oi the occipital lobe imme^ THE VISUAL CENTRES. 39 diately behind the external parieto-occipital fissure, and on each side of the internal parieto-occipital fissure. He obtains upward movements on stimulation of the under surface of the occipital lobe, the lower part of the mesial aspect of this lobe, and of the lower margin of the convex surface. He obtains a simple lateral movement of the eyes on excitation of the rest of the convex aspect of the occipital lobe and a narrow strip of the mesial sur- face along the margin of the great longitudinal fissure. The middle portion of the mesial surface does not appear to be in- cluded in this scheme. My hypothesis that these movements of the head and eyes are the signs of the arousal of subjective visual sensation, and due to associated action of the frontal or subcortical oculo-motor centres, has received confirmation from the experiments of Schafer on the latency periods of the ocular movements following excitation of the frontal and occipito-temporal regions respectively.^' The result of this comparison made in a number of monkeys was to show that the latent period is longer by some hundredths of a second in the case of stimulation of the occipital lobe than of the oculo-motor centre of the frontal area; thus indicating that in the former case the nervous impulses must be transmitted through at least one more nerve centre than in the latter. This would agree with the hypothesis that in the one case the movements were reflex, and in the other direct. The fact that the ocular movements are still obtainable on stimulation of the occipito- angular region, after complete removal of the frontal regions, shows that they are not necessarily indicative of the associated action of these cortical centres, but may be due, if they are not always so, to excitation of the oculo-motor centres of the corpora quadrigemina. Danillo^* has found that severance cf the fibres of association between the occipital lobe and the frontal region does not prevent the occurrence of the ocular movements ; while Bechterew^'' and Munk^* have found that the movements are entirely annihilated by severance of the subjacent medullary fibres. It is contended by Danillo and Bechterew that the movements cannot, therefore, be regarded as indicative of subjective visual sensation ; but this would not be disproved even if the movements still continued IS Proc. Boy. Soc, February 1.3th, 1888. 1* Archives de Neurologie, vol. xviii, 1889, p. 145. 1' Neurolog. Centralblatt., September 15th, 1889. ** Sitzungsberichte der Akad. d, Wiss. zu, Berlin vol. xvi, January, 1890. 40 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. after removal of the grey matter, for the excitation of the medul- lary fibres would be equivalent to excitation of the cortex itself. We may assume with Munk that there are radial or centrifugal fibres between the occipital cortex and the oculo-motor centres ; and that excitation of the central expansion of these tracts would produce practically the same effect as stimulation of the centres with which they are in relation. The occipito-angular region is the visual area of the cortex. Complete destruction of this area in the one hemisphere causes permanent hemianopia to the opposite side by paralysis of the corresponding halves of both retinae ; while bilateral destruction causes complete and enduring blindness of both eyes. Apart from the loss of vision, there are no other sensory or motor defects. The sensibility of the eyeball is intact, and the ocular movements are absolutely unimpaired. There is no impairment of the sensibility or motor power of the limbs. The other special senses are un- affected. If the destruction of the occipito-angular region is in- complete, unilaterally or bilaterally, the resulting hemianopia in the one case is not enduring, nor is the blindness permanent in the other. There is, however, scarcely a particular of the above general statement which has not been controverted ; but I am of opinion that every one of them is in accordance with the evidence fur- nished by strictly localised and carefully observed lesions of this region. In my earlier investigation, I was led to believe that the angular gyri alone constituted the visual centres, a conclusion which I founded on the positive effects of lesions of the angular gyri and the uniformly negative results of destruction of both occipital lobes, except when the lesions trenched on the parieto-occipital fissure. In the latter case it appeared to me that the imperfec- tions of vision or occasional total blindness were due to inter- ference with the functions or the connections of the angular gyri themselves. I show you here a photograph of the brain of one of my earlier experimental animals." Both occipital lobes were removed at the same time. Some encephalitis ensued, which caused extension of the primary lesions. Tou will see that on the right side, not only the occipital lobe, but also part of the posterior limb of the angular gyrus has been removed. On the left side the angular gyrus is intact, superficially, but the " Experiment XXIV, Phil. Trans., vol. clxv, part 2, 1875. TKE VISUAL CEXTRES. 41 medullary fibres of the cut surface bulge considerably, owing to inflammatory hernia. Notwithstanding this extensive bilateral lesion, the animal, within an hour of the operation, gave clear evidence of the retention of vision ; for it made grimaces, and ran away when threatened. Subsequent examination revealed the fact that vision, though good, was impaired, as indicated by some want of precision in laying hold of objects offered it. But, be- yond this slight defect in vision, there was no impairment of the animal's faculties in other respects, and it continued well until its death after a second operation three weeks subsequently, in which the greater part of both frontal lobes were removed. This second operation caused no further impairment of the animal's vision — a fact of great importance in reference to the question of the rela- tion of the frontal lobes to the sense of sight. Inasmuch as in this animal, as well as in others, in which similar symptoms occurred, the lesions implicated the region of the parieto-occipital fissure and angular gyrus, I attributed the impairment of vision to this cause ; for, when the line of section of the occipital lobes was well separated from this fissure, no impairment of vision was perceptible. Thus the occipital lobes were exposed on both sides in a monkey, and the surface destroyed by the cautery, which was also passed deeply into the interior of the lobes so as to break up the medullary fibres. The operation was completed at 3 30 p.m. The following are the notes of the animal's condition : — " 4.10 P.M. The animal, after lying in a state of stupor till now, begins to move, but staggers a good deal. The eyes are open and the pupils dilated. It indicated consciousness by turning its head when called to. " 5.45 P.M. Gives emphatic evidence of sight. Ran away when I approached it, carefully avoiding obstacles. Seeing its cage door open, it entered and mounted on its perch, carefully avoiding the cat which had taken up its quarters there. Tried to escape my hand when I offered to lay hold of it, but picked up a raisin which I had left on the perch."^" Notwithstanding the extensive destruction of both occipital lobes in this case, the animal, in a little more than two hours after the operation, gave the most emphatic evidence of precise vision. In another case in which the occipital lobes were severed by a *« Bzperlment XXII, Ph.il. Tram., vol. clxv, part 2, p. 25. 42 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. perpendicular section a quarter of an inch posterior to the parieto-occipital fissure,^^ the animal, notwithstanding the re- moval of at least two-thirds of both occipital lobes, gave clear evidence of vision within half an hour after the operation. In another monkey in which my colleague. Professor G, Y. Yeo, removed about two-thirds of both occipital lobes, the animal within two hours after the operation was able to pick up minute objects lying on the floor.^^ I show you here also a photograph of the brain of a monkey in which the left occipital lobe was removed by an incision immedi- ately posterior to the parieto-occipital fissure. In this case, owing to the dressings having been torn off, the wound became septic and the animal died on the fifth day. On the day after the operation, however, no imperfection of vision could be discovered ; for the animal took things offered it on the right or left front, and was able to run about the laboratory in every direction, passing among chairs and other articles of furniture without ever once knocking its head on one side or the other — actions which were altogether inconsistent with the existence of hemianopia. You will see that the margin of the plane of section, which bulges considerably from hernial protrusion, corresponds nearly with the external parieto-occipital fissure.^^ These experiments illustrate the negative effects of unilateral and bilateral lesions of the occipital lobe. I had found, however, in my earlier experi- ments that destructive lesions of the cortex of the angular gyrus on the one side caused temporary complete loss of vision in the opposite eye, so that the animal responded to no test of vision, and, when urged to move, ran blindly against every obstacle in its path,^* and that, when both angular gyri were similarly destroyed, complete blindness ensued in both eyes.'^^ The following observations were made on a monkey whose angular gyri were destroyed on both sides with the galvano- cau- tery. It was at once let loose, but appeared scared, and would not stir from its place. It was therefore for some hours impossi- ble to obtain any satisfactory information as to its powers of vision. The pupils were contractile to light, and a light flashed in the eyes caused some wincing. When a piece of apple was 21 Experiment XXIII, Phil. Trans., sup. cit. 22 Experiment IX, Phil. Trans., 1884. *3 See Fig. 1, Plate 20, Phil. Trans., part 11, 1884. »* See Experiments VII, VIII, IX, Phil. Trans., vol. clxv, 1875. 25 Experiment X, op. cit. THE VISUAL CENTRES. 43 dropped near it, so as to come in contact with its hand, it took it up, smelt it, and ate it with signs of satisfaction. Hearing was acute, and it turned its head and replied when called to by name. With the exception of reluctance to move from its position, aris- ing evidently from a sense of insecurity, there was nothing to in- dicate decisively that the animal was blind. But I had found that this animal was very fond of sweet tea, and would run anywhere after it. I therefore brought a cup of sweet tea, and placed it to its lips, when it drank eagerly. The cup was then withdrawn and placed in front of it, a little distance, but the animal, though from its gestures intensely eager to drink further, was unable to find the cup, though its eyes were looking straight into it. This test was repeated several times, and with exactly the same result. At last, on the cup being placed to its lips, it plunged its head in, and continued to drink till every drop was exhausted, while the cup was lowered and drawn half way across the room. Next day the animal still continued blind, and paid no attention to threats, grimaces, or other means of appeal to its sense of vision. It was then killed, in order that the position and extent of the lesions might be accurately determined before secondary inflammatory processes could have advanced. These had already begun, but were confined to the angular gyri, which were somewhat swollen and raised, and to the adjoining anterior margin of the occipital lobes, and with slight implication of the posterior margin of the left ascending parietal convolution. The destruction was purely cortical, the grey matter alone being disorganised, and on the angular gyri exclusively. These facts seemed to me to justify the opinion that the angular gyri were the visual centres, each being in relation with the whole of the opposite eye, since the effect of unilateral extirpa- tion was for the time total blindness of the opposite eye, and not hemiopia. And it further seemed as if the rapid recovery from unilateral lesion were due to the compensatory action of the other gyrus •, inasmuch as bilateral destruction caused total blindness in both eyes of a more enduring, and, as I ventured to suppose, prob- ably permanent, nature. But further investigation on animals kept alive for much longer periods than were compatible with the exact limitation of the lesion under old surgical methods showed that this conclusion was erroneous. My later investigations, in conjunction with Professor Yeo, under strictly antiseptic precau- tions, proved that the results of unilateral and bilateral extirpa- tion of the angular gyrus, though entirely in harmony with my 44 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. previous researches, were more temporary than I had previously thought, and that bilateral destruction did not cause permanent total loss of vision.^® In illustration I would quote the details of the following experiments. In one animal the left angular gyrus was cauterised with the galvano-cautery. " The left eye was secured, and the animal allowed to recover from stupor. At the end of half an hour it was evidently wide awake, but would not move unless touched. At this time it was removed from its cage and placed on the floor, whereupon it began to grope about in a sprawling manner, knock- ing its head against every obstacle. After some minutes of this behaviour it subsided, and refused to move. It made no sign of fear at threatening gestures, and did not wink at a thrust of the finger at its eye until the finger almost touched the conjunctiva, when the usual reflex closure occurred. Half an hour later the same tests were employed, with precisely the same indications of total loss of vision. At the end of still another half hour, while it was lying quietly in its cage, it was gently laid hold of without noise to attract its attention, whereupon it bounded away with an expression of fear and surprise, and ran full tilt against the leg of the table, where it remained groping and sprawling for a few minutes. It then started off, and this time ran against the wall, against which it sprawled helplessly. Similar things were re- peated. It gave no sign of perception when it was cautiously approached without noise ; but when a slight noise was made with the lips quite close to it, it darted off and came against the wall as before, where it lay down. Half an hour later, while it was resting quietly in a corner with its eyes open, the light of a lantern was flashed in its eyes, but it gave no sign. Creeping up to it cautiously without exciting its attention the observer made a slight whisper close to its face, whereupon it peered eagerly, but evidently remembering the results of running away it crouched down and would not move. Half an hour later, when it was quiet in its cage, it started suddenly on being touched, and ran its head into a corner, where it crouched. " Next day, its left eye being still closed, it showed unmistak- ably the possession of vision with the right eye. It laid hold of things as usual, and ran about the laboratory in every direction, passing obstacles right and left with perfect precision, and duck- ing its head to pass underneath bars as it ran along the top of 2fi See Experiments 3, 4, 5, 6, Phil. Trans., vol. ii, 1884. THE VISUAL CENTRES. 45 the waterpipes of the laboratory. No defect of vision, amblyopic or hemiopic, could be detected."*^ In another animal, the left angular gyrus was cauterised up to the parieto-«occipital fissure, the posterior part of the corpus cal- losum being also divided at the same time.^** " The left eye was securely closed, and the animals allowed to recover from its narcotic stupor. In half an hour it began to move about spontaneously, although rather unsteadily. An hour and a half after the operation it walked about the laboratory, knocking its head against legs of chairs and other obstacles in its path. When a piece of apple was held under its nose it grabbed it and ate. It continued to walk about here and there, every now and then coming to a dead halt full tilt against the wall. Three hours after the operation it again, in running about the laboratory, came full tilt with its snout against the wall, where it rested. While it was resting quietly we crept up to it ; but the animal, though with eyes wide open and looking towards us, made no sign of per- ception. Threatening grimaces were likewise without effect ; but on making a noise with our lips the animal seemed alarmed, peered forwards, and yet, though it came close to our faces, seemed to see nothing. It was tried to right and left in the same way, but there was no sign of vision to one side or the other. Next day, the left eye being still closed, the animal ran about in every direction, ducking under bars, passing objects right and left with the utmost precision, and never once knocking against anything one side or the other. Not the slightest impairment of vision could be detected, and it was able to pick up the minutest objects lying about its cage or thrown down near it." It was iirst shown by Munk^" that the permanent effect of com- plete unilateral extirpation of the visual sphere was not complete blindness of the opposite eye, but homonymous hemianopia, from paralysis of the corresponding sides of both retinse. This effect he obtained by section in the line of the parieto- occipital fissure, and he localised the visual sphere exclusively in the occipital lobe, regarding the angular gyrus as the " sensory sphere " of the eye. Owing, however, to the fact, as he himself admits, that secondary inflammation and extension of the primary lesion gene- rally, if not universally, followed his operative procedure, Munk's experiments cannot be relied upon when it is a question of the *' Experiment 5, Phil. Trans., vol. ii, 1884. *8 Experiment 7, op. cit. ** Ueber die Fuuctioneu der Qrosshiruriude, 1881. 46 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. exact delimitation of any given area. It is a reasonable supposi- tion that Munk's operations for removal of the occipital lobe would be the cause of secondary implication of the angular gyrus or its connections. The question as to the exact delimitation of the visual sphere, whether it is confined only to the occipital lobe, according to Munk, or embraces also the angular gyrus, according to my view, and the respective relations of the angular gyrus and occipital lobe to the eyes has been the subject of investiga- tion ty numerous physiologists : Luciani and Tamburini,^° Luciani,^^ Horsley and Schafer,^^ Sanger-Brown and Schafer,''^ Lannegraee,^* Gilman Thompson and Sanger-Brown ^' and is still a matter on which opinions are far from being in accordance. Luciani and Tamburini, and Luciani have arrived at the con- clusion that the visual centres are not confined to the occipital lobes, but embrace also the angular gyri, though the former be- lieved that the effects of unilateral destruction of the angular gyrus were hemiopic rather than amblyopic. The experiments of Horsley and Schafer and of Sanger-Brown and Schafer are of great value, as, owing to the use of antiseptic precautions, and the full details and figures which illustrate the experiments, their facts are avail- able for all inquirers. Horsley and Schafer record several experi- ments on the occipital lobe on one or both sides. The follow- ing experiment (24), which I give in their own words, is especially worthy of note. " The whole of the left occipital lobe was removed by an oblique incision along the parieto-occipital fissure. The piece removed included the extremity of the posterior cornu of the lateral ventricle, which was thus freely opened. No ill consequences resulted from this, however, and when on the fifth day the dressings were removed the wound was found to be completely healed. Eesult, no muscular paresis. The animal seems to have some disturbance of visual consciousness of the images of objects which fall upon the left side of the retinae; for an object, such as a raisin, presented to it on the right side of the visual line, is either not noticed or its nature is not readily recog- 30 Su,i Centri Psico-Sensori Corticali, 1879. 31 On the Sensorial Localisations in the Cortex Cerebri, Brain, July, 1884. 32 A Record of Experiments upon the Functions of the Cerebral Cortex, Phil, Trans., vol. clxxix, 1888, B. 20. 33 Functions of the Occipital and Temporal Lobes of the Monkey's Brain, Phil. Trans., vol. clxxix, 1888, B. 30. 3* Influence des Lesions Corticales sur la Vue, Archives de MMecine Experi- mentale, 1889. 35 The Centre for Vision. Researches of the Loomis Laboratory of the Medical Department of the Univenity of the City of New York, No. 1, 1890. THE VISUAL CENTRES. 47 nised. This condition, which was very marked at first, gradually improved, until three months after the operation it could no longer be determined." Other portions of the hemisphere, as shown in the figure, were removed, but into the results of these it is not necessary for me here to enter. The appearance of the brain is given in their iigures (24a and 24b), of which one represents the under surface, and, as the authors themselves say, " the representations are mainly of interest as showing the completeness of removal of the frontal and occipital lobes, and the limits of the lesion upon the under surface of the hemi- sphere."^^ Several others are recorded in which the lesions, unilateral or bilateral, trenched on the parieto- occipital fissure and region of the angular gyrus, and in none of these was hemiopia or blindness absolute or permanent. In one case (Experiment 26), in which both occipital lobes (external and posterior surfaces and a part of the under surface) were removed, with an interval of fourteen days between the two operations, there seemed to re- main a general impairment of visual perception, without, so far as could be made out, absolute blindness in any part of the field of vision, but of this they cannot speak with certainty. On the removal of the right angular gyrus complete left hemianopia was the result, which lasted, without any sign of improvement, until the animal's death, three months afterwards. Horsley and Schafer's experiments, therefore, in which the lesions of the occi- pital lobes were perhaps more extensive than any of those de- scribed by Yeo and myself — my earlier experiments excepted — show that at most the hemiopic disturbances are transient, while, in the first case referred to, there appears to have been complete removal of the occipital lobe, and yet the hemiopia was not of permanent duration. Destruction of the angular gyrus, in com- bination with the occipital lobe, was the only lesion which caused a permanent result. Their conclusions, as stated in their own words, are as follows : — " Our experiments upon the occipital region, although few in number, seem to link together the conclusions arrived at by Munk, and by Ferrier and Yeo as the results of their experiments. They indicate that both the occipital lobes and angular gyri are con- cerned with visual perceptions in such a manner that each oc- cipital region is connected with the corresponding lateral half of p. 35. 48 CEREBEAL LOCALISATION. each retina, and that a part only of the cortex of the region in question is able to take on in great measure — how completely cannot be determined in animals — the functions of the whole. This is in conformity, also, with the results of Luciani. So far as the occipital lobe alone is concerned, our observations confirm the statement of Munk that the effect of this lesion is to produce a hemiopic disturbance of visual consciousness. But the imperfect ■vision which remains after removal of both occipital lobes (see Cases 25 and 26) suggests that the area which is concerned with visual consciousness is not confined to those lobes, as was inferred by Munk, but extends over into the angular gyrus, per- manent hemiopia being produced by the subsequent removal of that convolution. It will, however, be necessary that further ex- periments should be undertaken, in order to determine more pre- cisely, not only the extent, but also the relative importance of the anterior, posterior, and mesial portion of the visual area of the cortex."^''' »T Op. cit., p. 19. LECTURE III, LECTURE III. Schafeb's further investigations, in conjunction -with Sanger- Brown, led him to agree with Munk that complete unilateral ex- tirpation of the occipital lobe alone caused persistent hemiopia, while bilateral extirpation caused total and enduring blindness. Admitting, however, that the lesions described by them were the cause of hemiopia or total blindness, it does not follow that these results are due to removal of the occipital lobe as such. Schafer himself ^ admits that the visual area embraces not only the occipi- tal lobe, but, perhaps also part, or the whole, of the angular gyrus. The relations of the different portions of the visual centres to the retina3, founded on the phenomena of electrical irritation, as well as other facts, necessitate that the angular gyrus (its posterior limb at least, according to Schafer) should be included in the visual area ; more, therefore, than the occipital lobe proper. If total blindness, therefore, is caused by removal of the occipital lobes in the line of the parieto-occipital fissure, it is necessary to suppose that by this operation the medullary connections of the whole of the visual area become implicated. Scbiifer- has him- self suggested that fibres connected with the cortex of the adjoining parts of the brain, and especially of the angular gyrus, may be cut off along with the occipital lobe, and than this is the real explanation is supported by many considerations.^ 1 Electrical Excitation of the Visual Area, Brain, April, 1888. 2 Brain, vol. x, p. 372. 3 This, however, does not fit conveniently into Schiifer's scheme, which is as follows : — 1. The whole of the visual area of one hemisphere is connected with the corresponding lateral half of both retina. 2. The upper zone of the visual area of one hemispliere is connected with tlie upper })aU of both retina;. 3. Th« lower zone of the visual area is connected witli tiie lower part of the correspond- ing lateral half of both retinic. 4. The intermediate zone of tlie visual area is connected with the middli- part of the corresponding lateral half of botli retiuiB (loc. cit., p. 5). The rfaictions wouM.liowever, be fully explained on the assump- tion that the angular gyrus has relations with the whole of the opposite eye. E 2 52 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. Lesions of the occipito -temporal region alone are competent to produce hemiopiaor complete blindness, according as the lesion is unilateral or bilateral, altogether apart from affection of the angular gyrus, or any other portion of the occipital lobe. I have myself recorded instances* in which lesions of the occipito- temporal region were followed by temporary hemiopia, and prob- ably similar facts have led Luciani to extend the visual area into the temporal lobe. But, not only may temporary hemiopia occur, but the hemiopia so produced may be persistent. Fig. 12. — Horizontal section of left hemisphere of monkey — on a level with the anterior commissure (nat. size) ; a.c, anterior commissure; c.A., cornu Ammonia; cZ., claustrum; e.g., corpora quadrigemina; ex., ex- ternal capsule; i.e., internal capsule; t.i?., island of Reil ;/., anterior or descending (Meynert) pillar of fornix; /^'., ascending fibres or Vicq d'Azyr's bundle; /'.df., Meynert's fasciculus; /.iS., fissure of Sylvius ; n.c, nucleus caudatus; n.l., nucleus lenticularis ; o.r., optic radiations (Gratiolet; ; P., pulvinar ; p., posterior commissure. Here is an illustration * of the brain in one of Brown and Schafer's experiments. The operation consisted in removal of the right temporal lobe. Posteriorly, the lesion extended partly over the under surface of the occipital lobe. With the exception of this lesion of the occipital lobe, all the rest of the visual sphere was intact, yet this animal was completely hemiopic. The inference is that the lesion severed the whole of the optic radiations, for, * Phil. Trans., vol. ii, 1884, Experiments 27 and 28 £ Figs. 4a, 4b, Phil. Trans., 1888, B. 30, plate 49. THE VISUAL CENTRES. 53 otherwise, it should, on Schafer's hypothesis, have caused blind- ness only of the lower portions of the retinfe. It appears, therefore, that the incision for the removal of the occipital lobe carried along the line of the external parieto- occipital fissure is calculated to sever the whole of the optic radiations of the occipito-angular region, which emerge from the primary optic nuclei about this level. (See Fig. 12). In support of this I quote the following experiment : I exposed the lower extremity of the left external parieto-occipital fissure, and, in- Flg. 13. eerting a director at this spot between the lower surface of the occipital lobe and and the tentorium, passed a stylet bent at an oblique angle along the groove in such a manner as to make a transverse incision a few millimetres in depth across the occipito- temporal region. The result of this was right hemiopia, which, however, speedily passed off, so that it was no longer clearly per- ceptible on the third day. A fortnight afterwards the right occipito-temporal region was similarly operated upon, the in- cision this time being made just anterior to the lower extremity of the parieto-occipital fissure. The animal died a month after the first operation. During the whole time it survived it re- mained absolutely hemiopic towards the left in every part of the viirual field. It was found after death (see Fig. 13) that the in- cision on the left side was shallow and not continuous, being in- terrupted in the region of the lingual lobule. On the right side £4 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. the incision extended across the whole occipito-temporal region, and penetrated several millimetres into the substance of the brain, dividing the medullary fibres emerging from the region of the primary optic centres. Brown and Thompson ^ believe that removal of the occipital lobe on one side causes hemiopia to the opposite side, altogether apart from lesion of the angular gyrus, which they entirely ex- clude from the visual sphere. They give particulars of a monkey, in which, after removal of the left occipital lobe, right hemiopia resulted, together with right hemiansesthesia, which was still ob- servable on the twenty-sixth day after the operation. One hun- dred days after the first operation the right occipital lobe was similarly removed. This was followed by complete blindness, but they state that after three weeks the animal recovered vision to some extent towards the left. They assume — but furnish no evi- dence of the fact — that probably a few occipital fibres had escaped injury during the second operation. The animal died of phthisis on the 23,1st day. On examination it was found that the entire occipital lobe behind the angular gyrus upon each side had been removed, leaving a clean-cut surface. For some distance around this surface the pia mater was firmly adherent to the convolutions beneath, but it was stated not to have been thickened. It is cer- tain, however, that their first lesion must have extended beyond the occipital lobe, owing to the hemianaesthesia, which does not occur when the lesions are restricted to the occipital lobe itself ; and that the removal of the occipital lobes, as such, which they appear to have found equally complete on both sides, did not cause total loss of vision, is shown by the fact, which they them- selves record, that the animal was still able to see, even if imper- fectly, towards one side. In a second experiment they found that destruction of the left angular gyrus caused no result beyond hemianeesthesia on the right side, together with some paralysis of the right arm (!). On the ninetieth day a second operation was performed, consisting in excision of the whole of the right occipital lobe. This was followed by left hemiopia, which still persisted when the paper was written, seventeen months after the operation. These are the only experiments on monkeys which these authors have recorded. Lannegrace,'' on the other hand, who has performed numerous experiments on the occipital lobes and angular gyri of monkeys, states, in accordance with my o wn and Yeo's results, that destruction of the occipital lobe causes no 6 Op. cit. T Op. cit. THE VISUAL CENTRES. W appreciable impairment of vision, whereas destruction of the angular gyrus produces crossed amblyopia of a temporary character. He reports two cases of successive lesion of the angular gyri. In the one the first lesion induced crossed amblyopia, which lasted four days. The second lesion, however, produced no ap- preciable alteration. In the other the first lesion again caused crossed amblyopia, which disappeared in two days, while the second gave rise to lasting amblyopia. These results, which are similar to those obtained by Yeo and myself, depend, no doubt, on the degree of completeness of extirpation of the gyri. I have already mentioned that my earlier experiments, as well as those made by Professor Yeo, show that unilateral destructive lesion of this gyrus caused temporary blindness of the opposite eye, and that bilateral destruction caused for the time complete blindness in both eyes. Though these results have been much questioned, I must insist on their accuracy. I have corroborated the occurrence of apparently complete blindness of the opposite eye, on destruction of the left angular gyrus in an animal which- I lately made the subject of experiment. In this animal I had previously enucleated the left eye, so as to exclude all complica- tions from this side. After removal of the left angular gyrus, however, the animal, though otherwise well and in complete possession of all its senses and motor powers, was evidently ab- solutely blind. It responded to no test of vision ; would not budge from the spot, but when urged to move sprawled blindly and helplessly. This condition lasted for several hours, during which it was under observation. Next day there were indications of vision, but the animal had become so prostrated, the weather being intensely cold, that it died before any further exact obser- vations were possible. That lesions of the angular gyrus may cause implication of the optic radiations is possible, but this re- sult is neither necessary, nor would it account for complete loss of vision in the opposite eye. The bilateral relations of the angular gyrus account for the transient nature of the amblyopia which results from unilateral extirpation, and, as in few of my experiments was the destruction of this gyrus complete on one side or the other, it occasionally happened that removal of the other gyrus some time subsequently did not seem to impair vision either on one side or the other. When, however, the angular gyri are completely destroyed on both sides, the animal, though for the first three or four days absolutely blind, does not remain so permanently, but it never regains normal vision, This also has 56 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. been confirmed by the researches of Lannegrace. Apart from the afiection of vision, destruction of the angular gyrus causes no other symptoms, either motor or sensory ; there is no ptosis or paralysis of the ocular muscles, and the sensibility of the con- junctiva is absolutely unimpaired. These results, confirmed by the researches of Horsley and Scl afer, contradict the statement of Munk that the angular gyrus is the sensory sphere of the eyeball ; and it will be found, on exa- mination of Munk's own data, that the phenomena on which he relies as indicating loss of the sensibility of the eye are in reality due to loss of vision. Thus he says that after destruction of the left angular gyrus approximation of the finger to the left eye in- variably caused winking, whereas the same threat against the right eye caused winking only when the eyelids were actually touched. This appears to be a proof of the sensibility of the eye, and the non-perception of threatened danger at a distance. The absence of winking at threatened danger he admits to be charac- teristic also of blindness, but he argues that, inasmuch as the animal could not be blind, presumably because the occipital lobe was intact, therefore, the non- occurrence of winking could only be due to the inability of the cortex to act on the sphincter pal- pebrarum ! Again, he says, that when the angular gyrus has been destroyed on one side, and the eye on that side closed, the ani- mal often fails to seize things offered it, or thrown down before it, especially when the objects are small. This I consider a clear indication of amblyopia. And he also states that after bilateral extirpation of the angular gyrus of monkeys, " after incomplete restitution " — a phrase, however, which is not very intelligible — are unable like normal monkeys to take things offered them deli- cately with the fingers, but make grabs at them with the whole hand. This is only a further illustration of the same imperfec- tion of vision which I have described — namely, want of precision in prehension, and a continual tendency to place the hand over or short of the object aimed at, instead of on it at once. Schafer also* records the symptoms in a monkey in which he destroyed both angular gyri. For the first few days the animal appeared totally blind, but vision gradually returned, and before long was quite good for distant objects. The animal could ap-- parently see small objects, such as a raisin, at a distance, but on running up to it seemed to have some difficulty in finding it, 8 Brain, July, 1888, p. 159. THE VISUAL CENTRES. 57 Scbafer is of opinion that this latter fact is due to absence of vision in the antero-superior and lateral portions of the retinae. I have lately carefully investigated the condition of vision in a monkey in which I had completely destroyed both angular gyri. There was no ptosis, the ocular movements were normal, the con- junctival reflexes unimpaired, sensibility was intact everywhere, and the motor powers were perfect, but, for four days at least, the animal was evidently absolutely blind. When urged to move it ran against every obstacle in its path, paid no attention to threats, could not find its food, except by groping, and appeared insensible to light flashed in its eyes. On the fifth day there were evidences of returning vision. It did not now knock its head against ob- stacles; would not walk over the edge of the table; showed signs of perception of light flashed in its eyes, and occasionally seemed to wince when threatened. Vision gradually improved, but con- tinued very imperfect, especially for minute objects, which it rarely, if ever, seized quite precisely ; groping at them with the whole hand, and reaching short, or over, or to the side. It ap- peared to see objects held above, below, and to either side much better than those held in front of its eyes. Six weeks after the operation my colleague, Professor McHardy, examined the ani- mal, which was very docile, with me, testing every portion of the visual field by pieces of apple suspended by a delicate thread. It was concluded that vision was better in everj' part of the peri- phery than in the centre. Objects held directly before the eyes and at a little distance were apparently not clearly seen, and never laid hold of with precision. The condition remained un- changed for three months after the operation, similar tests being from time to time applied, and with the same result. I noted also that the animal, when examining any object, always held it at full arm's length from its eyes. The phenomena observable in this animal were such as would be best explained by impairment or loss of central vision ; for it is well known that when central vision is lost or impaired in man, objects are better seen at a dis- tance than close at hand, and less distinctly when the ej'es are immediately converged on them. This is practically the condition seen in this animal. The loss of central vision would thus ac- count for the fact, noted by Schafer in his animal, that objects were better seen at a distance than near at hand ; and that Munk's animal could never place its fingers precisely on any small object held directly in front of its eyes. There was certainly no indica- tion, but the reverse, that the upper portions of the retinae were 58 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. less sensitive than the lateral and lower portions. It appears to me, therefore, that the symptoms resulting from bilateral destruc- tion of the angular gyrus, described by myself, Munk, and Schafer, are best explained on the supposition that the angular gyri are more particularly related to the area of distinct vision, and, ac- cordingly, with the maculae lutese. The facts of disease in man render it necessary to assume that the region of the yellow spot is represented in each hemisphere, though more in that on the opposite than on the same side, and the probability is that the area of clear vision is represented mainly in the angular gyrus of the opposite hemisphere. The retinal relations of the visual centres are not capable of being explained by a simple division of the retinal fields into co- related halves projected on the corresponding side of each hemi- sphere. For unilateral lesion of the angular gyrus produces a temporary blindness or amblyopia of the opposite eye ; while bi- lateral destruction induces an enduring impairment of visual acuity in both eyes." The results of my experiments seem to show that the angular gyrus has relations with both eyes. The crossed action, however, is the only one which is clearly demonstrable in the lower animals, but this does not exclude the possibility of some impairment of vision on the same side, not perceptible by tests applicable to them. It is certain that in man affections of the visual centres occasionally produce crossed amblyopia, and not homonymous hemiopia. Not only is this characteristic of the visual disturbances seen in hysterical hemianaesthesia, the path- ology of which is obscure, but it has been noticed also in cases of organic disease. Usually, along with the blindness, or great im- pairment of vision in the opposite eye, there has been some degree of contraction of the visual field of the eye on the same side. I have myself reported several such cases,^° and Qowers" has also seen similar instances. A well-observed case of this nature has been recorded by Sharkey.^^ Post-mortem examination revealed softening and absorption of a considerable area of the opposite hemisphere, including the angular gyrus. The occipital lobe was intact, and in nowise reduced in size as compared with the other. 9 This accords with Gowers's hypothesis that " on the outer surface, in front of the occipital lobe, there is a higher visual centre in which the half fields are combined, and the whole opposite field is represented." (^Diseases of Nervous lii^stem, vol. ii, p. 19.) 10 Cerebral Amblyopia and Hemiopia, Brain, vol. iii, p. 456. 11 Diseases of the Nervous System, p. 19. 13 Medico- Ckirurgical Transactions, vol. Ixvii, 1884. THE VISUAL CENTRES. 59 A distinguishing test between tract and central hemiopia has been suggested by Wil brand," and advocated by Wernicke and Seguin, which consists in determining whether a pencil of light thrown on the blind side of the retinae induces contraction of the. pupil or not. As the optic tract is the path of the fibres which excite pupillary contraction through the oculo-motor centres, as well as those which excite visual sensations in the cortex, lesion of the optic tract will cause not only hemiopia, but also paralysis of the reflex reaction of the pupils to light ; whereas, lesion of the cor- tical centres will cause hemiopia, but leave intact the pupillary reaction. This test, however, requires great care in its applica- tion, as it is difficult to restrict the rays of light entirely to the blind side. In a case recently under my care at King's College Hospital,^* in which the dividing line passed through the fixation point, and which was carefully investigated in this relation by Professor McHardy and myself, the pupillary reaction was not ob- tained, as a rule, when the pencil of light was thrown on the right side of the retinte ; whereas it occurred readily when the light was. thrown on the left half of each retina. These facts, therefore, would corroborate the hypothesis that this was a case of tract hemiopia. I have recently verified the hemiopic pupillary reaction in two monkeys in which I accidentally severed the optic tract in estab- lishing lesions of the temporal lobe. The result in both cases wa» absolute hemiopia to the opposite side. In both cases the left optic tract was divided, and in both, along with right hemiopia, there was absence of reaction of the pupil when a fine pencil of electric light was thrown on the left half of each retina ; whereas, active reaction took place when the light was thrown on the right half. Both in the monkey, and in several cases of hemiopia in man depending on lesions of the hemisphere, I have found that the pupillary reaction is equally well marked whichever side of the retina is illuminated. There can be no question that in man and monkeys there is decussation of the optic tracts in the 13 Op. cit. 1* Tlie patient was a man, aged 39. Two years before he had contracted syphilis, and at the time of his admission was suffering from a large tertiary ulcer on the soft palate. He bad twitching of the right side of the face, together with weakness and numbness of the left side. The left hand grasp was weak, and there was loss of dorsal flexion of the left foot. The tongue deviatefl to the right on protrusion. He was found to be absolutely hemiopic towards the left side, and a careful perimetric examination by Professor McHardy demonstrated that the dividing line passed exactly through the fixa- tion point. 60 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. chiasma. Michel, in his comparatively recent monograph,^' still maintains the contrary, on the basis of microseop'.cal investiga- tion ; but his results have been attributed by Singer and Miinzer^^ to imperfect methods of examination. In reference to the pathology of crossed amblyopia from lesion of the angular gyrus in the monkey, as well as of similar cases of disease in man, I may here allude to the hypothesis advanced by Lannegrace. Lannegrace regards the eyeball as innervated by two sets of fibres — sensorial, or optical proper, and sensory, on which the proper nutrition of the eyeball depends. The sensorial, or optical, decussate in the chiasma, and are distributed to the occipital lobe ; while the sensory decussate in the pons, and, apply- ing themselves to the posterior fibres of the internal capsule, are distributed mainly to the angular gyrus. Lesions of the sensory fibres produce amblyopia and sensory disturbances in the eyeball. A similar result follows lesion of the angular gyrus, and is essen- tially dependent upon changes which are induced in the nutrition of the eye. This hypothesis would require that in all cases of amblyopia from cerebral lesion there should be impairment of sensation in the eyeball. But this is certainly not the case, for, though in hysterical amblyopia there is affection of common sen- sation as well as of vision, it is not so in the amblyopia following destruction of the angular gyrus. Though affections of the fifth nerve, which cause loss or impairment of sensation of the eyeball, frequently also lead to trophic disorders of the eye, yet this is not necessarily so ; and, even when the eyeball is absolutely anaesthetic, provided that no trophic disturbances have occurred, vision is not in the least impaired. In proof of this I would refer to cases (Cases I and iii) reported by Hutchinson in the Ophthalmic Hos- pital Reports, vol. iv, 1863-65. Nor does complete anaesthesia of the eyeball induced by cocaine impair the visual acuteness of the eye. These appear to me to be fatal objections to the hypothesis ad- vanced by Lannegrace, and I contend that the only hypothesis which seems to harmonise with all the facts is, that the angular gyri are more particularly the centres for clear vision, each mainly for the eye of the opposite side. Whether the other portions of the retinae, upper, lower, outer, and inner, are specially repre- sented in corresponding regions of the occipital lobe, according to the hypotheses of Munk and Schafer, cannot be said to have 15 Veber Sehnerven-Degeneration und Kreuzung, 1887. 16 Beitriige zur Kenniniss Sehnervenkreuzung, 1889. THE VISUAL CENTRES. 61 as yet been established; for, even after the most extensive destruction of the occipital lobes, no portions of the retinae appear to be absolutely blind ; hence, even if we admit that the effects of irritation probably indicate a special relation of the different portions of the visual field to certain portions of the occipital cortex, the relation, so far as we may judge by the facts of dis- ease or experimental lesion, does not seem to be an exclusive one. It is true that in man we sometimes find, besides general hemi- opic deficiency, partial, quadrant or sector-like, defects in the upper or lower halves of the visual field. These appear, how- ever, to be merely incomplete hemiopia, and occasionally, as in the case which I show you, an islet of subnormal visual acuity may be seen in the defective half. The pathology of these sector- like defects is a matter of conjecture. They have not been con- clusively brought in relation with lesions of any particular por- tion of the cortex, and the probability is that they are dependent rather upon partial lesions of the optic radiations than of the cor- tical centres themselves. This was without doubt the pathology in the case which I have alluded to, for the defect occurred in a patient who had a sudden attack of hemiplegia accompanied by hemiansesthesia and some affection of speech. It is doubtful whether there are on record any cases of strictly cortical lesions of the occipital lobe proper, accompanied by hemiopia, apart from direct or indirect implication of the optic radiations. In most of the cases of hemiopia which have been examined after death, in which the optic tracts, optic thalami, or corpora geniculata have not been obviously diseased, the lesions have been found in the medullary fibres of the posterior region, vaguely or inaccurately called the occipital lobe ; or, if the cortex has been mainly affected, the lesions have been multiple and dif- fuse, and not confined to the occipital region. And in addition to hemiopia, there have been hemiplegia, hemiansesthesia, aphasia, or other symptoms of implication of the cerebral tracts and centres beyond those of the occipital region. Under my direction, my friend and pupil. Dr. Ewens, has col- lected and analysed the majority, if not all, of the recorded cases of hemiopia (with necropsies) depending on cerebral lesions which have not obviously been of such a character as to cause indirect and indefinite implication of other regions. Of 41 cases of hemi- opia, 15 were from disease of thp occipito-angular region, 2 were cases of disease of the angular and supramarginal gyri only, 15 62 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. were described as being from disease of the occipital lobe alone. Of these 15, there were only 2 (Hun's case" and Doyne's case^*) in which there was not either a tumour, cyst, abscess, or softening of the medullary substance of the occipital region, or another lesion affecting the optic thalamus; and in 1 of these cases (Doyne's)i the position of the lesion was not accurately described. In the other cases the lesions were of a diffuse character, 6 being from lesion of the occipito-temporal region, and 3 from lesion of the occipital, temporal, and parietal lobes simultaneously, the angular gyrus being implicated in all. From the comparative frequency with which hemiopia has been found associated with lesions of the cuneus and its neighbour- hood Seguin " and Nothnagel ^^ are of opinion that this portion of the occipital lobe has a special relation to visual perception ; while Wilbrand believes that the visual centre is more especially in the apex of the occipital lobe. These hypotheses are not sup- • ported by experimental research. The probability is that any apparent relation between lesions of the cuneus and the occur- rence of hemiopia, is due to the special proclivity of this region to affection by morbid vascular conditions, and to coincident impli- cation of the optic radiations of the occipito-temporal region. In Seguin's own case,^^ on which he relies in support of his hypo- thesis, not only was the cuneus implicated, but also the fourth and fifth temporal gyri and a part of the gyrus hippocampi.-* Cases have also been recorded in which, not only unilateral, but bilateral lesions have been found in the occipital lobes without any affection of vision whatever. Irritative lesions of the angular gyrus occasionally give rise to optical illusions, or flashes of light, followed by temporary amblyopia, as recoMed by Hughes Bennett ^^ ; while destructive lesions of the angular gyrus, more particularly in the left hemi- iT Amer. Journ. Med. Sci., 1887, Case i. w Ophthal. Soc, Lond., November 14th, 1889. 19 The Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, vol. xiii, January, 1886. 2U Neurolog. Centr-alblatt, 1387, p. 213. 21 Op. cit. 22 Since this was written a case has been put on record by Delepine {Trans. Path. Soc. Lond., May 20th, 1890) in which right hemiopia was apparently asso- ciated with softening of the left cuneus. In this case, however, there was general arterial degeneration, and there were many circumscribed patches of softening in various parts of the brain. In particular there was a small area which had destroyed the greater part of the middle occipital convolution. This case is, therefore, too complex to allow of exact conclusions as to the connec- tion between the hemiopia and the lesion of the cuneus in particular. S3 Excessive Sensory Cortical Discharges and their Effects, Lancet, March 30th and April 6th, 1889. th:e visual centres. 63 sphere, are generally associated with the special form of sensory aphasia termed " word- blindness " (Kussmaul). Word-blindness i3 not necessarily accompanied by any noteworthy affection of visual sensation, though in some cases, where the lesion of the occipito-angular region is more extensive, there may be a greater or less degree of right hemiopia. On the other hand, right hemiopia, pure and simple, is not necessarily associated with any defects in visual ideation. This would be an argument against its cortical nature. The fact that visual ideation, more particularly in reference to the association of written symbols with their meanings, is apt to suffer more readily than simple perception, appears to me to illustrate the laws of the evolution and dissolution of the nerve centres, which have been so ably expounded by Hughlings Jackson in his Croonian Lectures delivered here a few years ago (1884). As evolution is from the most simple and most stable up to the most complex and least stable, so destructive processes annihilate fii'st of all the higher, and last of all the lower functional manifesta- tions. The functions of the visual centres in respect to mere visual sensation, or simple presentation, are much more stably organised than those which imply visual ideation or re-presenta- tion, and in particular such highly specialised and complex pro- cesses as are involved in the association between visual symbols and things signified. Hence, a lesion of the area of clearest vision may paralyse visual re-presentation, while the simpler function of visual presentation may not be appreciably impaired. In order that this also should be entirely abolished it is necessary that every trace of the given centre should be extirpated. In other words, re-presentative blindness will occur sooner than presentative blindness, and the former more readily in its most specialised modes of manifestation. In regard to the visual centres of the lower vertebrates, I can-» not quote many observations or experiments of my own. The visual centres of dogs have been the chief subject of physiological investigation. Hitzig^^ first noted the occurrence of blindness m the opposite eye from destruction of the occipital region in dogs- and in 1881 Goltz described an affection of vision resulting from destructive lesions of the opposite cerebral hemisphere, which, however, he did not specially associate with lesions of the occipital lobe, though he has more re- cently admitted this relationship. The affection in question 24 Centralblattf. d. med, Wimenschaften, 1874. 64 CEREBRAL L CALISA TION. was, in his opinion, not complete blindness, but an ina- bility on the part of the animal to understand or interpret what it saw. To this condition he gave the name Hirnsehschwiiche, or cerebral amblyopia. It was entirely crossed, and affected only the eye on the side opposite the lesion. Munk, in his first experi- ments, arrived at essentially the same conclusion ; namely, that the affection of vision resulting from lesion at the point A, Fig. 14, occurred only in the opposite eye. Dalton ^' also found that the opposite eye was rendered blind, and to all appearance perma- nently so, when the cortex was destroyed in the region of the Fig. 14. — Cortical centres of tlie dog, after Munk. A, Visual area ; B, audi- tory area; C to J , tactile sensory area (Fiihlsphare) ; D, fore-limb region ; C, hind-limb region ; E, head region ; F, eye region ; G, ear region ; H, neck region ; J, trunk region. posterior division of the second external convolution, which he terms the angular convolution. Luciani and Tamburini, on the other hand, found that destruction of the second external convo- lution, more particularly of its median or parietal portion, caused blindness of the opposite eye, and also some degree of amblyopia of the eye on the same side. The further experiments of Munk, however, as well as those of Loeb ^* and of Goltz,^'' and also the later experiments of Luciani,^* appeared to show that though in 25 Centres of Vision in the Cerebral Hemispheres, Med. Rec, 1881. 26 Pfiuger's Archiv, Bd. 4., 1884. 27 Ibid., p. 450. 28 Sensorial Localisations in the Cortex Cerebri, Brain, vol. 7, 1885, p. 145. THE VISUAL CENTRES. 65 dogs the visual area is mainly in relation with the opposite eye, it is also in relation with the outer quadrant of the eye on the same side. Hence, destruction of the visual centre in the one hemisphere paralyses the inner three-fourths of the oppoaite retina, and the outer fourth of the retina on the same side. The condition, therefore— at least the enduring one— is that of homo- nymous hemiopia towards the opposite side : the defect in the eye opposite greatly exceeding that in the eye on the same side. But the facts recorded by Luciani and Tamburini indicate that, for a short time at least, after the destruction of the middle portion of the second extf rnal convolution there is blindness in the opposite eye. And Goltz -^ remarks that he does not think that his former con- clusions were due to defective observation, but that there was probably some variation in his operative procedure. It is, how- ever, likely that we have here the same relations as exist in monkeys, and that, for the time at least, after complete extirpa- tion of the visual sphere, there is total blindness in the opposite eye. This is confirmed by the experiments of Bechterew, recently published.'" Bechterew finds that in dogs and cats there are two regions in the cortex related to vision ; the one in the occipito-parietal region, in relation with the corresponding halves of both retinse ; the other, more especially in the parietal region, in relation with the opposite eye alone. Lesion of the former causes homonymous hemiopia; lesion of the latter, generally, possible only in association with the former, causes, along with hemiopia, amblyopia of the opposite eye by paralysing the centre of clear vision. This combined affection usually after a time gives place to homonymous hemiopia ; or, on the contrary, the hemiopia disappears and the cross- ed amblyopia remains. Bechterew's con- clusions may serve to explain, among others, the results arrived at by Gilman-Thompson and Sanger- Brown,'^ which appear to be entirely at variance with those of Munk, Goltz, and most other physiologists. For they find that lesions, of sufficient size and depth, in the posterior part of the occipital region in cats and dogs, invariably cause blindness of the opposite eye, with no im- pairment of vision in the eye of the same side. These authors, however, seem to think that the extent of the visual sphere is a matter more of cubical capacity than accurate anatomical Ipcali- sation ; for they say that in order that the blindness should be 2» Op. cit., p. 48. »u Atistract in Neurolog. Ctrntrnlhlatt, April. 1R90. 31 Uesearches of the Loomis Labouitory, 1890. -66 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. permanent, between 2.5 and 3 cubic centimetres of brain tissue should be removed in cats ; and between 4.5 and 6 cubic centi- metres in dogs. To render the blindness permanent, the incision must be at least 0.5 centimetre deep, and 2 centimetres in dia- meter, in cats ; and 1 centimetre deep, and 3 centimetres in dia- metre, in dogs ; and it must involve at least two convolutions. Smaller lesions produce complete blindness of the opposite eye, lasting from a day or two to six weeks. They conclude from their experiments that in cats and dogs there is complete decussation of the optic nerves in the chiasma. This is, however, opposed by the researches of von Gudden,^^ which show that in dogs and cats there is partial decussation of the optic tracts ; and Nicati ^^ found, experimentally, that division of the chiasma in the an- tero-posterior, or sagittal diameter, did not cause complete loss of vision in either eye. The recent researches of Singer and Miinzer, previously alluded to, indicate that there is only partial decussa- tion in the chiasma of the cat, dog, and also in the rabbit. The exact limits of the visual sphere in dogs are still the sub- ject of some differences of opinion, but all the experiments agree in including in this area the posterior half of the second external convolution. This is the convolution which in its electrical reac- tions corresponds with the angular gyrus and occipital lobe in monkeys. The visual area, as defined by Munk, is represented in the accompanying figure (Fig. 15). Point A, situated chiefly in the posterior division of the second external convolution, he re- gards as the centre of clear vision (macula lutea) of the opposite eye. The mesial portion of the visual sphere adjoining the falx he regards as the centre for the inner half, the anterior portion for the upper half and the posterior portion for the lower half of the opposite retina. The lateral portion he regards as the centre for the outer quadrant of the eye on the same side. Destruction of each portion he states induces blindness in the respective region of the eye on the opposite or same side accordingly, and it is only by abnormal fixation of the eyes, or by practice, that the animal is able to overcome the defects so induced. Munk describes, as the effects of extirpation of a circular area of the cortex in region A, measuring about 15 millimetres in diameter and 2 millimetres in thickness, a condition of vision, or visual per- ception, similar to that already defined by Goltz. The animal is not blind, inasmuch as it is able to avoid obstacles, but it appears 32 Arch'ves f. Ophthahnologie, 1874, Band 20. 33 Archives de Physiologie, 2iid Series, Tome 5, 1878. TEE VISUAL CENTRES. 67 to have lost all visual ideation. To this affection 1 e gives the name Seelenblindheit or " psychical blindness," in contradistinc- tion to Rindenblindheit or "cortical blindness," which implies total loss of vision presentative, as well asre-presentative. In ex- Fig. 1.5.— Relations of the eyes to tlie visual area in tlie dog (after Miinlc). planation of this condition he propounds what appears to me a somewhat crude hypothesis, viz., that extirpation of the region in question has removed all the visual pictures which are stored up in and around the spot, and that it is only by a process of educa- K 2 m CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. tion that the animal again acquires a new stock of pictures which are deposited in the undestroyed portion of the visual sphere. Some pictures, however, apparently less fragile than the rest, may escape the general destruction occasioned by this iconoclastic lesion. In one case it is the picture of the dish out of which the animal has been accustomed to drink ; in another it is the sign to " give the paw," which the animal has been accustomed to obey. Goltz has criticised this hypothesis in the following amusing terms : — " A considerable portion of the cortex of the occipital lobe is de- scribed a3 the visual area by Munk. By far the larger portion of this area, however, is, according to him, pure luxus. The me- morial pictures {Er inner ungsbilder) of the visual perceptions are huddled together like sheep in a storm, in a narrow spot which occupies only about two-sevenths of the whole visual area. When this small spot, which corresponds to the macula lutea of the human retina, is destroyed on both sides the animal is at first blind, and only gradually learns to see, like a puppy, with the aid of the rest of its visual sphere. Five-sevenths of the visual sphere — a large portion of the cortex — appears retained in order that a dog which falls into the hands of the physiologist should again learn to see, when its accumulated visual pictures are cut out. All dogs which escape this fate — and these, since the creation of the dog, must be very many — carry during their life five-sevenths of their visual sphere as an uncultivated fallow field. A wonderful thing in hypotheses !" ^* Even if it were the case that the different portions of the retina are represented in the indicated regions of the visual area, it is improbable that these could be determined with any degree of certainty except by exact perimetric investigation, which is natu- rally impossible in the lower animals. The difficulties of deciding questions of this kind in the lower animals are illustrated by Munk's account of his experiences with rabbits.^' "I had at least believed that I could determine with which eye the rabbit saw better, and with which it saw worse. In this, however, I have been mistaken, because it occasionally happened to me that where from tests I had thought I had made out that the greater imper- fection of vision existed in the left eye, post-mortem examination revealed the fact that the left tract and the right optic nerve were more atrophied than the right tract and the left optic nerve." 3* Op. cit., p. 175. 35 Sitzungsberichte Akad. d. Wissensch.. zii Berlin, vol. xxxi, June 20th, lf89, p. 631. THE VISUAL CENTRES. 69 Loeb, after a series of carefully devised experiments, concludes that there is no foundation for the views of Munk that particular segments of the retinre are in special relation to definite regions of the visual area. When defect of vision occurs from lesion of the posterior lobe, it is always of the same hemiopic or hemiam- blyopic character, whatever portion of the visual sphere be in- jured. The lateral portion of this sphere is not in special relation with the outer quadrant of the eye on the same side, nor is any portion more in relation with one part of the opposite retina than another. In particular, central vision is precisely that which is lefist affected in all cases, whether of unilateral or bilateral lesion of the visual zone. There is never any eccentric or abnormal fixa- tion of the eyeballs when the special regions indicated by Munk are destroyed, such as would necessarily result if the correspond- ing portions were paralysed, nor is the recovery of vision, after partial lesions of the visual area due to practice, or to the acquisition of new visual experience, inasmuch as recovery takes place when the animal is kept absolutely in the dark, and thus prevented from exercising its visual faculties. In rabbits the visual centre would, according to the homology of the electrical reactions, occupy the parieto-occipital region of the hemisphere. The exact limits of the visual zone of these ani- mals do not appear to have been accurately determined by any observer, though certain experiments of Moeli^' point to lesions of the region indicated as causing, at least, temporary blindness of the opposite eye. It has been supposed that in this animal tliere is complete decussation of the optic tracts in the chiasma, inas- much as the experiments of Brown-S^quard have shown that sagit- tal division of the chiasma causes complete loss of vision of both eyes. The total decussation in the chiasma of the rabbit was also supported by the earlier researches of von Gudden, who found that after enucleation of one eyeball the opposite optic tract only became atrophied." But, in his later researches, he concluded that a small fascicle of uncrossed, or direct, fibres exist also in the optic tract of this animal, similar to that seen in higher verte- brates. Singer and Miinzer are also of opinion that there is only partial decussation in the chiasma of the rabbit, but the uncrossed tract does not run as a separate bundle, but as fibres more or less diffused throughout the optic tract. In the mouse and guinea- 's Archives de Pht/siohgie, 1871-72 : Sur les Communications de la Retine avec rBncriilialc". 3' Archiv f. Oplithalmologie, Dd. 20, 1874. 70 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. pig, howerer, the decussation is a complete one. The partial de- cussation of the optic tracts in the chiasma would favour the opinion that, in the rabbit also, both eyes are more or less in rela- tion with each visual zone; and certain experiments of Munk would seem to favour this notion. The point, however, is one which requires further investigation. In pigeons, and in birds in general, the region which in its elec- trical reactions is homologous with the visual centre of the higher animals occupies the parieto-posterior aspect of the hemisphere, where it forms a thin lamina over the corpus striatum. McKen- drick^^ found that destruction of this region caused blindness in the opposite eye; whereas removal of the anterior part of the hemisphere had no effect on vision, nor removal of the posterior extremity of the hemisphere. Similar results have been obtained by Jastrowitz ^^ and Musehold.*" Blaschko, however, found that vision did not seem entirely abolished in the opposite eye by de- struction of the cortex in the region indicated; and Munk came to the conclusion that though vision at first seems entirely abol- ished in the opposite eye, yet, after a time, it is regained in the extreme outer or lateral portion of the retina. It is usually stated that in pigeons a complete decussation of the optic tracts occur in the chiasma, but von Gudden expresses some doubts on this point. Singer and MUnzer, however, believe that in the pigeon a total decussation occurs. Munk quotes, in favour of his conclusions, certain observations by Miiller to the effect that in the retina of the pigeon there is, besides the usual fovea centralis, another fovea, situated nearer the temporal region of the retina. The outer fovese would subserve binocular, and the central fovese monocular vision. These statements have been sup- ported by the ophthalmoscopic investigations of Hirschberg. It has seemed to me that if any bird can possess binocular vision it should be the owl, whose eyes are placed almost in the same plane. To decide this question I recently completely extir- pated the right hemisphere of an owl. The right eye was then securely closed. The owl reacts very readily to visual tests, and is keenly alive to every movement coming within its field of vision. This bird, however, for ten days at least, remained per- fectly indifferent to the electric light flashed in its eye, to all kinds of threats, and when urged to move flew blindly against 38 Trans. Roy. Soc. of Edinburgh, January, 1873. 39 Archiv f. Psychiatrie, Bd. vi, 1876. *o Experimentelle Untersuchungen uher das Sehcentrum bei Tauben. Diss inaug. Berlin, 1878. THE VISUAL CENTRES. 71 every obstacle in its course. At the end of this time there were indications of vision, which were found, however, to depend on the partial unclosure of the right eye. In order to ascertain if the visual centre of the left hemisphere was undamaged, the right eye was completely freed from its closure. This had the effect of restoring the animal's sight, so far as the right eye was concerned, though no indications of vision could be made out in the left eye. The bird was able to pursue and ultimately catch a mouse intro- duced into its cage, though the mouse frequently escaped for the time by getting to the owl's left. The right eye was then re- moved. It then speedily became apparent that the animal was not entirely blind, but could see towards the right with the outer portion of its left eye. It noticed and winced at threats made towards the right, came forward and pecked at pieces of meat held in this position, though its aim was not very accurate, and one day pursued about the cage and ultimately, after considerable difficulty, captured a mouse, which it devoured whole. No doubt can therefore be entertained as to the binocular relations of each cerebral hemisphere in the owl. It is stated, however, by Michel, as well as by Singer and Miinzer, that there is total decussation of the optic tracts in this bird. If this be correct, it follows that total decussation of the optic tracts is not inconsistent with binocular representation in each cerebral hemisphere. My own experiments, as well as those of Munk, Horsley, and Schafer, show that when the lesions are strictly limited to the visual sphere, vision alone is affected or abolished, without any implica- tion of the other forms of sensibility, general or special, and ab- solutely without any motor paralysis. The contrary results ob- tained by some authors are without doubt dependent on primary or secondary injury to other sensory or motor tracts or centres. In Goltz's experiments the affections of vision from injury of the occipital regions appear to have been almost invariably associated with other forms of sensory disturbance ; but the manner in which he established his lesions has not been sufficiently definite as to exclude implication of the sensory tracts of the internal capsule, or other sensory regions of the cortex. Whether after destruction of the whole visual sphere in the higher animals, man and monkey, any form of reaction to retinal impressions, beyond that of the pupil, may continue— as has been contended for by Goltz in the case of dogs, and by Luciani and Tamburini, and Lannegrace even in the case of monkeys— is not supported by clinical investigation, or by my own experiments, or those of 72 CEF.EBBAL LOCALISATION. Munk on monkeys. Thotigh the monkey, rendered blind by total extirpation of its yisnal centres, acqaires tbe power of aToiding obstacles when left amidst its usual saseoQiidii^s,yet tiiis appears to be due rather to a sharpening of its other f acaiHeB, cr Bsata attentive appreciation of the impfessuHos saade go. t^ese \rf the objects -with which it is siirroimded, fbaa to 'vienal sensafiaB. The question is, howeTer, cms -miaeh. Biay well bear fiaxliier int- vestigatioiL ; for, if retinal xsa^psessSsBss are eo- 124 CEREBSAL LOCALISATION. and would throw it down without tasting. But whether this was due to any sense of smell or merely an habitual action was not quite clear, for it would throw down shells of nuts, crusts of bread, and husks, which are practically without smell, after examining them. It also exhibited likes and dislikes in the matter of food, as, for instance, preferring apples to boiled potatoes, and it seemed to like sugar and boiled rice ; but whether these likes and dislikes depended upon purely sapid characters I could not positively determine. The general results, however, of my observations incline me to believe that the ani- mal's faculties of smell and taste, though obviously impaired, were not entirely abolished. It, however, for a considerable time after bilateral destruction of the lower extremity of the temporal lobe, did not refuse to eat substances the smell and taste of which are in the highest degree objectionable to normal animals, and I do not think it is possible to explain this otherwise than on the hypo- thesis that the centres of olfactory and gustatory perception were, if not completely, at least extensively disorganised. It would have been well to have carried out further observations on this point, but — owing to the rather excessive mortality among my monkeys occurring at the time of the influenza epidemic — I have not been able as yet to extend my researches in this direction. An interesting accidental experiment on a dog has been recorded by Munk which is of importance in reference to the question before us. Munk observed that a dog which he had rendered blind by bilateral destruction of its visual centres seemed unable to dis- cover by the sense of smell pieces of meat which were scattered before it. A slight sniflBlng which it occasionally made was the only indication that it might possess some traces of olfactory sensibility. The animal continued in this condition for several months, at the end of which time it was killed. It was found after death that the whole of the hippocampal gyrus on each side was converted into a thin walled transparent cyst, full of flaid. Ex- cept for the cicatrices caused by the removal of the occipital lobes, the brain was otherwise normal, as well as the olfactory tracts and bulbs. Though Munk is of opinion that this case shows that the hippocampal gyrus is the centre of smell, yet inasmuch as the hippocampal lobules were implicated as well as the rest of the hippocampal gyri, we may regard it as merely a confirmation of the facts which indicate that the sense of smell is localised more particularly in the hippocampal lobule. OLFACTORY AyD GUSTATORY CENTRES. 125 Luciani,^" as the result of his experiments on dogs, concludes that: " No evident deficiency of smell follows extirpation of the temporal lobe ; but if the lesion extend to the neighbourirg con- volution above the fissure of Sylvius, one observes a notable diminution of that sense. Finally, a number of experiments show that an extensive decortication of the gyrus hippocampi, as well as partial ablation of the cornu ammonis, produces olfactory dis- orders, at first an almost complete loss of smell — a fact which seems to indicate to us that this portion of the brain is the central point of the olfactory sphere." Luciani is also of opinion that each centre is in relation with both nostrils, but more particularly with the nostril on the same side. In the diagram, however, which he gives of the limits of the olfactory sphere, he extends it upwards into the parietal region as far as the longitudinal fissure, and partly, also, towards the frontal lobe. In regard to the sense of taste, he states that on one occasion, in a dog, he found that, after unilateral extirpation of the fourth external convolution, and of a portion of the gyrus hippocampi, the animal seemed to be less sensitive to bitters (digitaline) on the opposite side of the tongue. (This is mis- stated in Brain. A reference to the original experiments^ shows that the lesion was in the left hemisphere ; smell was lost in the left nostril, and taste on the right side of the tongue.) Clinical and pathological evidence in favour of the localisation of the senses of smell and taste is as yet comparatively scanty. We have seen that, from anatomical considerations at least, the olfactory centre is in direc' relationship with the nostril, but I have already mentioned that the symptoms of hysterical hemian- aesthesia wou'd appear to indicate that the olfactory, like the other centres of special sense, are in relation with the opposite side. It is questionable whether the coincident general anaes- thesia of the nostril met with in this condition altogether ex- plains the anosmia ; for I have found that smell is not abolished when the general sensibility of the nostril is lost inconsequence of disease of the fifth nerve. It is, however, diflBcult, with our present knowledge, to trace an anatomical connection between the nostril and the opposite side of the brain. The matter is, therefore, one which requires further investigation. There are clinical casea which plead in favour of the direct relationship of the olfactory eentrfs. It may be objpcted against those reported by Ogle, a« "Seneorial Localisations in the Cortex Cerebri," Brain, 1886. *' Dig Function)- Localuattun auf der Crotihir-jtrrnds, p. 117. 126 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. Fletcher and Ransome,^^ in which anosmia was found associated with aphasia and right hemiplegia, that there may have been direct implication of the olfactory tract or bulb. But a case has been reported by Churton and Griffith,^^ in which smell was im- paired on the same side as the lesion, namely, a tumour which caused erosion of the uncinate convolution, and which did not appear to have, directly at least, affected the olfactory tract. Several cases have been recorded of olfactory aurse or crude sensations of smell, in association with lesions implicating the region of the uncinate gyrus. One has been reported by McLane Hamilton,-^ without any implication of the olfactory nerves. Another has been recorded by Worcester,^" and a third by Hugh- lings Jackson and Beevor,^*^ in which the whole of the anterior end of the right temporo-sphenoidal lobe was the seat of a tumour involving the nucleus amygdalae and the medullary fibres. Smell, however, was not lost in this case, either on the one side or on the other, which can be accounted for by the fact that the whole of the centre was not destroyed by the tumour. This case as well as the others noted are, as Dr. Jackson re- marks, of considerable value in determining sensory localisation, though naturally they do not afford such precise indications as to the position and limits of the centre as are afforded by destructive lesions causing entire abolition ©r considerable impairment. So far as they go, however, they harmonise with the results both of anatomical and physiological investigation. The smacking of the lips and tasting movements which are sometimes observed along with crude sensations of smell — " the dreamy states " of epilep- tic attacks — are probably discharges of the gustatory centres ; but we have still fewer pathological facts bearing upon this point than on the situation of the olfactory centres. A case has been re- lated by Dr. James Anderson^'^ of a peculiar smell and taste sensa- tion and dreamy state associated with tumour affecting the left temporo-sphenoidal lobe; but the lesion was too extensive, and too indefinite to allow of any precise conclusions being founded on it as to the position of the gustatory centre. 2* See Functions of the Brain, 2nd Edition, p. 321. «3 Brit. Med. Journal, May 28th, 1887. "^New York Med. Journ., vol. xxxiv. 's Amer. Journ. of Insanity, July, 1887. 26 Brain, October, 1889. 27 Brain, vol. Ix, 1887, p. 385. LECTURE VI. LECTURE Vr. Mr. Pbesidsnt and Gentlemen, — I now come to the considera- tion of the physiological signification of the Rolandic area of the monkey and man, and its homologues in the brain of the lower mammals. I have already described with some detail the move- ments which are capable of being excited by electrical stimula- tion of the different regions included within this area. How these movements are to be interpreted is a subject on which there are great differences of opinion. The definite purposive character of the movements, however, their correspondence with the ordinary volitional activities of the animals, and, above all their uniformity and predictability, harmonise best, in my opinion, with the hypothesis that they are indications of the functional excitation of centres directly concerned in effecting volitional movements, and anatomically a part of the motor apparatus. It has been established by experiments on monkeys — and now 80 generally admitted that it is almost unnecessary to enter into detailed proof — that destruction of the centres, excitation of which produces definite movements causes paralysis {qud voli- tion) of the same movements on the opposite side of the body, varying in degree, completeness, and duration with the extent c f the destruction of the respective centres. When the destruction is complete the paralysis is permanent, and is followed in due course by descending degeneration of the pyramidal tracts of the spinal cord, and secondary contracture in the paralysed limbs. As an illustration I quote the following experiment on a monkey which was exhibited at the International Medical Congress in London, 1881, eight months after the operation. The cortex was destroyed as shown in the figure (Fig. 33), in the left hemisphere over an area embracing the ascending frontal and ascending parietal convolutions, except at their upper and lower extremities. The lesion also invaded the base of the superior frontal convolution, and the anterior limb of the an- K 130 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. gular gyrus. There was thus destroyed nearly the whole of the motor area on the convex aspect of the hemisphere, the centres for the leg, foot, and trunk being only partially destroyed ; those for the angle of the mouth and tongue almost entirely escaping. The result of this lesion was almost complete right hemiplegia with conjugate deviation of the head and eyes to the left side. As in similar cases in man, the deviation of the head and eyes was only of comparatively short duration, and the partial facial paralysis, at first perceptible, also disappeared within a fortnight ; but the paralysed condition of the limbs continued very marked, "With the exception of slight power of flexion of the thigh and leg, the right lower extremity was helpless, and the right arm FiK. 3.3. was incapable of independent volitional movements. Occasion- ally, when the animal struggled, associated movements were observed in the right hand, similar to those initiated by the left, but only under such circumstances. The power of prehension was entirely annihilated. Cutaneous sensibility was unimpaired throughout. The slightest touch excited attention ; and a pinch, or other painful stimulus, caused signs of sensation quite as vigorous as on the other side. This was the condition in which the animal was when exhibited at the International Medical Congress, and at this time well-marked contracture had become established in the paralysed limbs, with exaggeration of the tendon reactions, as in cases of incurable cerebral hemiplegia in man. THE MOTOR CENTRES. 131 The investigation of the brain of this animal was carried out by a committee appointed by the Physiological Section, and the position of the lesion in the motor zone, and its limitation to the cortex and subjacent fibres, were definitely proved by them. Microscopical investigation also demonstrated the existence of secondary degeneration in the pyramidal tracts of the right side of the spinal cord as far as the lumbar region. In the case represented in Fig. 34 the lesion, which was estab- lished at the upper extremity of the fissure of Rolando in the left hemisphere, caused paralysis of the right leg, without affection of sensation, followed in due course by contracture of the paralysed Fig. 34. muscles. This condition remained unchanged for eight months, at the end of which time the animal was killed. In this case also secondary degeneration was demonstrated in the medullary fibres of the corona radiata, and in the pyramidal tracts of the opposite side of the spinal cord as far as the lumbar region, whence emerge the motor nerves of the lower extremity. In another experiment the cortex was destroyed in the middle of the ascending parietal convolution and adjacent margin of the ascending frontal convolution of the right hemisphere. The result of this was almost complete paralysis of the left hand, and great weakness of the flexor power of the forearm. The shoulder movements, however, were unimpaired ; the animal could stretch K 2 132 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. its arm forward, bat could not grip with its hand what it wished to lay hold of. Tactile sensibility was absolutely unimpaired in the paralysed limb, the slightest touch on it at once exciting th© animal's attention, and a painful stimulus, such as a pinch or touch with a heated wire, caused as lively signs of sensation as on the other side. This condition remained essentially unchanged for the two months which the animal survived the operation. Many similar experiments have been recorded by Horsley and Schafer,^ and their observations on the functions of the marginal gyrus deserve special note. Extirpation of the marginal convo- lution causes paralysis of those movements which remain more or less unaffected after the destruction of the centres on the convex aspect of the hemisphere ; namely, movements of the trunk, those of the hip muscles, as well as some of those of the leg. In order, however, that these movements should be entirely paralysed, it is necessary that the marginal convolution should be destroyed in both hemispheres ; as it would seem that the trunk movements are so bilaterally co-ordinated in the marginal convolution, that the removal of one only is not sufBcient to cause any very marked effect. When both are removed, however, the most absolute para- lysis of the trunk muscles is induced. " The attitude and general appearance of a monkey in which this double lesion has been produced are very striking. Instead of sitting up with back somewhat curved, in the manner normal to monkeys, an animal which has been submitted to this operation lies prone, with legs and feet outstretched (or, at most, with flexed hips), back flat, tail straight and motionless, and arms put forward to clutch at any neighbouring object. The head retains its power of rotation, as well as flexion and extension, and the movements of the eyes and facial muscles appear normal. The animal frequently props itself upon its elbows, but never assumes the normal sitting atti- tude. If the monkey desires to sit up, it can only do so by drag- ging itself into the sitting posture by its arms and hands, and holding on by these to the wires of the cage, or to any neighbour- ing object. If the hold should be detached the animal imme- diately tends to fall over. Progression is effected almost entirely by the arms, the monkey dragging itself along with the aid of these, assisted by the flexion which occurs at the hips ; the legs are quite limp and draggled, the dorsal surface of the toes being drawn over the ground."* 1 Phil. Trans., B. 20, 1888. » See illustration, Fig. 20, op. cit.. THE MOTOR CENTRES. 133 Besides the movementa of the trunk, there are others which are also bilaterally represented in each cerebral hemisphere. This holds in respect to the upper facial region, as well as those of the larynx. Hence, unilateral extirpation of the centres of these movements causes no, or scarcely any, perceptible impairment ; and it is necessary that the centres should be destroyed on both sides in order that paralysis should result. It has been shown by Krause in dogs, and by Horsiey and Semon in monkeys, that unilateral extirpation of the laryngeal centres does not appreciably impair the adduction of the vocal cords, whereas phonation becomes volitionally impossible when the centres are destroyed in both hemispheres. It would appear from the researches of Franck and Pitres,^ Exner,* Lewaschew,' Sherrington,* that such movements as are not primarily bilaterally represented in each cerebral hemisphere are secondarily associated, in accordance with a hypothesis originally advanced by Broadbent, by commissural fibres con- necting the bulbar and spinal nuclei with each other. Though moderate stimulation of the cortical centres of the limbs gives rise to movements as a rule only on the opposite side, yet it not infre- quently happens, if the stimulation be increased, that movements occur in the limbs on both sides. These are, however, more pro- nounced on the opposite than on the same side. In the monkey as well as in man, it i3 not unusual to find descending degenera- tion in both lateral columns as the result of unilateral cortical lesions. According to the recent researches of Sherrington, if the cortical lesions affect only the centres for the limbs, bilateral degeneration does not occur, to any extent at least ; but this is very pronounced if the lesions affect the marginal convolution. The degeneration is confined to the pyramidal tracts on the same side as far as the decussation of the pyramids, but becomes bilateral in the spinal cord. In the case, however, of the more obviously bilateral laryn- geal centre, degeneration is well marked in the pyramids of both sides. These facts, as well as clinical observations in man, show that, even in the case of the limbs, each hemisphere represents both sides of the body, mainly the opposite, but to some extent also the same side. » LeQorui sur leu Fonctions Matrices du Cerveau, 1887. * Sitzungsh. d. Wiener Ahad, .3 Abth., pp. 185-190, 1881. •'' Arrhtvf. Phyn^olngie. D• Sengibilitatsstorungen bei Hirnrindenliisionen, Zeitsch. f. Heilkunde, Bd. il, p. 375, 1881. 1* Localisation der Functionen in der Grosshirnrinde des Menschen, 1881. " Die Functions- Localisation auf der Grosshirnrinde, 1886. •• Localised Cerebral Disease, Amer. Jour. Med. Sc, 1884. ^'Cortical Localisation of Cutaneous Sensations, 1888. *•* Zur Lehre von der Localisation des Ge/i'Ms in der Grosskirnrinde, 1883. " Case of J. H., Brain, vol. x, p. 95. " Trlpier, Rev. Mens., 1880, Case 4. 140 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. one all varieties of sensibility were retained, but the localisation of touch was somewhat defective.^^ In this case, however, the inner table of the skull had been driven into the brain substance, causing general hemiplegia. In two the lesion extended deeply into the white substance. In one case the cortical lesion was complicated by the presence of a large tumour in the centrum ovale.^* In one sensibility is said to have been blunted on both sides of the body. In another ^' the lesion was a large hgemorrhagic cyst in both central convolutions In this, and in five others, the island of Reil or external capsule was involved. In one hemiplegia was accompanied by anaesthetic formication of the paralysed foot. In this case there was tuber- cular deposit implicating the gyrus fornicatus as well as the cen- tral convolutions. In seven others there was diffuse meningo- encephalitis or tubercular meningitis. In ten cases of crural monoplegia, from disease of the para- central lobule, cutaneous sensibility was unaffected in six, its condition not mentioned in two, and affected in two. In the one^^ sensibility to pain was a little diminished in the paralysed limb, but this disappeared the next day. In the other^'' the leg became gangrenous, a condition which was preceded by anaesthesia. Of fifteen cases of paralysis of the arm and leg from disease of the paracentral lobule and upper third of the ascending convolu- tions, sensation was intact in six, not mentioned in five, and affected in four others. In three of these the paracentral lobule was deeply involved, one of them being a tubercular mass : and in only one was the anaesthesia marked or permanent. In all four the lesion was in immediate proximity to, or actually involved, the gyrus fornicatus. In one case, under my own care,^^ of traumatic cicatrix at the upper third of the ascending frontal convolution, excision of the lesion was followed by loss of tactile sensibility on the dorsum of the two distal phalanges, and ina- bility to indicate the position of the fingers of this hand. This impairment of sensibility ultimately disappeared, while the motor paralysis continued as at first. In this case the lesion was such as to actually implicate the gyrus fornicatus. Of 35 instances of brachial monoplegia, 5 were cases of excision =•= Bramwell's CaBe, Bbit. Med. Jouenai,, August 28th, 1875. 2* Seguin's case, Trans. Amer. Neurol. Assoc, 1877, p. 115. 25 Starr's case, 75. Amer. Journ. Med. Sciences, July, 1884. 26 Gouguenheim, Soc. Med. des Hopitaux, 1878, p. 48. 2' Ballet, Archives de Neurologie, Tome v, p. 281. 28 Case of J.B., Brain, vol. x,, p. 26. THE MOTOR CEXTRES. u\ of portions of the cortex for the cure of focal epilepsy. In two, cases by von Bergmann"" and Keen,3o sensation was intact. In another case reported by Keen," of hemiplegia and epilepsy, resulting from depressed fracture, there was, after the operation, slight im- pairment of sensation in the middle of the forearm and two inner fingers. But this condition of sensibility was similar to what had existed before the operation. In another ^^ there was no obvious impaiiment in tactile (?) or muscular sensibility. The patient could not distinguish the form of objects owing to the inability to mov« his fingers. In a fifth case '^ the removal of a tumour from the right lower parietal region, which was the cause of epilepsy beginning in the thumb, was followed by tactile anesthesia of the whole of the left side, together with loss of so-called muscular sense in the left arm. In this case the sensory tracts for the whole of the opposite side of the body were obviously implicated. Of the 30 others, sensibility was unimpaired in 12, not mentioned in 15, and affected in 3. In one of these the lesion was a gumma.^* In the second ^' there was a clot compressing the island of Keil ; in the third sensibility was said to have been extinguished over the entire surface of the body.^*^ Of 19 cases of lesion of the lower half of the Rolandic zone, causing paralysis of the face and arm, sensation was unaffected in 11, not mentioned in 5, and affected in 3. In one of these," how- ever, a blood clot in the island of Reil compressed the subjacent convolutions. In another reported by the same author^'* a small tubercle the size of a hemp seed, situated in Broca's convolution, is described as having caused (!) paralysis of the right side of the face and arm, and anaesthesia of the right side of the trunk. The third, also reported by Petrina, was similar to the second. In 10 cases of disease of the lower third of the Rolandic zone, causing simple facial paralysis, sensation was intact in 4, not mentioned in 5, and affected in 1. In this case =» there wa. said to have been anaesthesia, not only of the face, but of half the trunk. 29 Archiv. f. Klin. Chirurg., p. 864, 1887. 30 Amer. Joum. Med. Sc, 1888, Case 3. »i Ibid, Case 2. 32 Lloyd and Deaver'e case, Amer. Joum. Med. Sc, 1888, p. 477. 33 Jackson and Horsley, Brain, vol. x, p. 93. 3* Martin, Chicago Med. Jour., vol. 46, p. 21. 35 Wood, Phil. Med. Times, vol. v, p. 470. '• Bingrose Atkins, Bbit. Med. Journal, 1878. 3' Petrina, Zejf.nrh.f. Hnlkunde, vol. x\, 1S8I, Case 1, •'8 Ibid. Case 6. 3* Petrina, fup. cit., Case 3. 142 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. It thus appears that, of 284 cases of lesion affecting the Rolandic zone, general or in part, in 100 the condition of sensibility was not mentioned ; in 121 it was stated, and by many of the most reliable clinical observers, to have been intact ; and in many of these *" all varieties of sensibility are expressly stated to have been carefully investigated. In the remaining cases no detailed notes are given as to the different modes of sensibility, and the methods applied for testing them. In 68, some impairment of sensibility was noted. In 28 of these, the lesion was not confined to the Rolandic zone, but implicated adjacent lobes, especially the parietal. The remaining 35 have already been analysed, and it has been shown that, in the majority at least, conditions existed which were calculated to implicate either the sensory centres in the gyrus fornicatus, or the sensory tracts of the internal capsule. Even where these cannot have been demonstrated to exist — and I freely admit that there are such cases— it is more logical to assume that they may have existed than that in some individuals the tac- tile and motor centres should coincide, while in other this should not be the case. I do not consider that the sensory aura which occasionally precedes or accompanies a localised epileptiform spasm can be taken as a proof that the motor and sensory areas coincide. It may prove contiguity, functional or anatomical, but not coincidence. For the most careful investigation in a large number of cases has failed to detect the slightest impairment of any of the forms of general sensibility, while the motor affection has been of the most pronounced character. There is also no re- lation between the degree of affection of sensibility and that of the motor paralysis. The motor paralysis has been absolute *<> Mills {Trans Amer. Cong, of Phys., etc., 1888, p. 269), (digest in Brain, Oc- tober, 1889); Delepine {Trans. Path. Sac, 1889); Ferrier (.Brain, April, 1883, p. 67); Moutard-Martin (Bull. Soc. Anat., 1876, p. 706); Laquer (Inaug. Dissert. Breslau, p. 91, Case 10) ; Mills (University/ Med. Mag., November, 1889) ; Ferrier (Brain, vol. x, p. 95) ; Raymond et Derignac (Gaz. MM., 1882, p. 665) ; Von Bergmann (Archiv. fiir klin. Chir., 1887, p. 864); Davy and Bennett (Brain, vol. ix, p. 74) ; Ballet (Archives de Neurol., vol. v, p. 275, Case 1) ; Lloyd and Deaver, Amer. Jour. Med. Sciences, vol. 96, p. 477); Keen (Cerebral Surgery, Amer. Jour. Med. Sciences, 1888, Case 3). One might add to these cases not a few of hemiplegia with aphasia (not followed by post-mortem examination) in which the symptoms pointed to cortical lesion. In one, recently under my care at King's College Hospital, of absolute paralysis of the right arm asso- ciated with word-blindness and word-deafness, the patient was aware of the slightest touch on the paralysed hand, or of a drop of warm or cold water falling on it, and with eyes blindfolded could put her left hand on the spot, in whichever position her paralysed arm was placed. This is a method of testing the sense of position in those who are unable to understand or speak, and is also applicable to the lower animals. THE MOTOR CENTRES. 143 while the affection of sensibility has been slight, and confined to one, or at most two or three, fingers ; or the motor paralysis has been limited, while the impairment of tactile sensibility has been general. And in others the affection of tactile sensibility, at first observed, has disappeared, while the motor paralysis has re- mained. And when, moreover, we take into consideration the fact that tactile and muscular sensibility may be abolished in the absence of motor paralysis, a condition which can be experiment- ally produced in monkeys by lesions of the falciform lobe, we have a further proof that the motor and sensory centres of the cortex are anatomically distinct from each other, and that we cannot attribute the motor paralysis to any defect in tactile or muscular sense. The occurrence of slight defects in tactile and muscular sensibility, more particularly in the fingers, which have been noted by several as a special characteristic of lesions of the cortical motor zone, are, in my opinion, to be looked upon as the beginning or remnants of a general hemiansesthesia, rather than as indicative of special centres for the tactile and muscular sensi- bility of the digits in the motor cortex. In illustration of this, I would mention the details of the fol- lowing case. The patient was a lady, aged 50, suffering from word-blindness and a slight degree of right hemiopia, which, from these and other symptoms, I diagnosed to be due to a tumour in the region of the angular gyrus. There was no paralysis of motion, but there was slight impairment of the localisation of touch and the sense of position in the fingers of the right hand, the face and leg being normal in this respect. An operation was undertaken by Mr. Horsley for the removal of the tumour, but it was found, on trephining to be situated beneath the angular gyrus, and could not safely be removed. This was a case in which, without doubt, the sensory tracts of the internal capsule were implicated, but only to a slight extent ; hence the limitation of the anaesthesia to the fingers. Had the implication of the internal capsule been more extensive, there would undoubtedly have been loss of tactile and muscular sensibility on the whole of the opposite side of the body. This case has an important bearing on the hypothesis advanced, among others, by Nothnagel " that the centres of the muscular sense are situated in the parietal lobe. Defects of tactile sensi- bility, and of the sense of position of the limbs, have not infre- *i VI ConxresB fiir Innere Meclicin, Neurolog. CentralUatt, 1887, vol. 0, p. 2I.'i. 144 cehebral localisation. quently been observed in connection with lesions of this regioB, sometimes complicated with hemiopia when the lesions have in- vaded also the occipito-angular region, as in the above case, and in one reported by Westphal." But the real cause of these symptoms I believe to be implication of tne sensory tracts of the internal capsule which lie underneath this region, and not affection of the cortex itself ; for lesions of the inferior parietal lobe do not, in my experience, produce the slightest affection of general sensibility on the opposite side of the body. Cortical lesions of the motor zone causing complete paralysis may occur without any impairment whatever of the muscular sense ; and loss of the muscular sense may occur without motor paralysis. I agree with Bastian, James,*^ and others — and have furnished experimental proof thereof — who hold, in opposition to the views maintained by Bain, Wundt, and Hughlings Jackson, that the sense of movement, its range and direction, are dependent upon in-going, or centripetal, impressions conditioned by the movement itself, and not on the out-going current or energising of the motor centres. We have, I believe, no sense of innervation independently of the sensory impressions arising from the parts which are moved. The energising of the motor centres and motor apparatus is re- vealed in consciousness only through the functioning of the cor- related sensory tracts and centres. The idea or conception of a movement is, therefore, a revival in the respective sensory centres of the various impressions which have been associated with this particular movement. Of these the most important are the visual factors and those which are included generally under the so- called muscular sense. In learning a movement our chief guide is vision, which enables us to place our limbs in the position re- quisite to produce any desired effect, and we associate also with the particular movement a distinct set of muscular sense impres- sions. The revival of these, singly or conjointly, is the idea of the movement, and this allowed to excite the appropriate muscu- lar combination is the volitional act itself. I hold that the centres of the sensations which accompany muscular action, and which form in part the basis of our ideas of movement, are distinct from the cortical centres, through and by which the particular movements are effected. The destruc- *2 Zur Localisation der Hemianopsie und des MuskelgefUbls beim Mensohen, ChariU-Annalm, 1882. 43 The Feeling of Ejfort, 1880. THE MOTOR CENTRES. 145 tion of the cortical motor centres paralyses the power of execu- tion, bat not the ideal conception of the movement itself. A dog with its cortical centres destroyed has a distinct notion of the movements desired when asked to give a paw, but it makes only inefftctual struggles and fails to comply. So, too, it not infre- quently happens that a patient rendered hemiplegic by embolism of hii Sylvian artery only discovers his infirmity by his in- ability to extcute the movements which he has distinctly con- ceived. Voluntary movements are capable of being carried out in the entire absence of all sense of movement. In the well-known case described by Schiippel,*^ the patient, anaesthetic from spinal disease, was able to co-ordinate his limbs perftctly, and, move them freely and forcibly with the aid of vision ; and even without the aid of vision to employ them with a fair degree of precision and steadiness. A similar condition is met with in hemian- sesthesia from organic lesion of the sensory tracts of the internal capsule, and in the functional forms described under the name of hysterical hemiansesthesia. Though the patient is able to move the anaesthetic limb volun- tarily, he has no knowledge of its position or of the resistance which may be offered to its intended movement. Bastian,*' how- ever, maintains that "the rule has been with the hemiansesthetic patients which have been so thoroughly investigated by Charcot at the Salpetriere that, although there has been complete loss of tactile sensibility, and usually absolute insensibility to pain in the skin and all other sensitive structures on the affected side, together with paresis of the affected limbs, the so-called 'muscular sense ' has been nearly always preserved." On this question I have appealed to M. Charcot himself. He has favoured me with a reply, from which I quote the following : " Cases of hysterical hemianaesthesia may be seen both in men and women affecting only the superficial integument, and without im- plication of the muscular sense, but the obnubilation, or complete disappearance of the muscular sense — in particular the loss of the sense of position of the limbs — is each very frequent, one might almost say habitual, in hysterical hemiansesthesia, especially when it is accompanied by paresis or hemiplegia Up to the present I have not met with serious impairment, strictly limited to the muscular sense in hysteria, unaccompanied by cuta- neous hemiansesthesia. It appears from all this that the aboli- ♦* Archio d. Heilkundf, 1874, Bd. xv, p. 44. ■*'• The Muscular Sense, Hrain, vol. x, 1889. 148 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. bilities are most varied and most perfect, should be developed far beyond those of other animals, but precisely the opposite holds For relatively as compared with the brain, and relatively as com- pared with the size of the animal, the spinal motor centres of man are less developed than those of the lower animals; and they are absolutely less than those of many animals whose capabilities are of the simplest order. The development of the spinal motor centres corresponds with that of the purely reflex synergic mus- cular combinations of the related metameres or body segments; while that of the cortical motor centres corresponds with the multiplicity and complexity of the motor faculties, volitional and cognitive. From the various considerations above advanced I conclude that the motor centres of the cortex are not the centres of tactile or general sensibility, nor are they the centres of the muscular sense, whether we regard this to depend on centripetal impressions, conscious or unconscious, or on a sense of innervation; but that they are motor in precisely the same sense as other motor centres, and, though functionally and organically connected, are anatomi- cally differentiated from the centres of sensation general, as well as special. Fbontal Centbes. The region of the brain which lies in advance of the Kolandic area and marked off by the precentral sulcus is one respecting the functions of which there is still considerable doubt. Anatomi- cally it is r-lated to the motor tracts of the internal capsule. These tracts, according to the investigations of Flechsig, lie in the inner portion of the foot of the crus, and connect the frontal lobe with the opposite cerebellar hemisphere indirectly through the grey matter of the pons. Destructive lesions of the frontal centres, both of the postfrontal and prefrontal regions, as I have shown experimentally, cause descending degeneration of these tracts ^^ not capable of being followed beyond the upper part of the pons. The direction of the degeneration may be taken as a proof of the motor signiftcancation of the regions in question. Similar degenera- tions have been described by Brissaud^" as the result of lesions of the frontal lobe in man. He has not been able to trace the dege- neration into the pyramid, and concludes that the internal tracts of the foot of the crus connect the frontal regions with the motor nuclei of the medulla. Degenerations in this part of the crus havo, according to his observations, been always associated with *9 See Fig. 122, Functions of the Brain. 50 Contraction Permanente des Hemiplegiqiies, 1880. THE FRONTAL CENTRES. 149 psychical defects, apart from paralysis of the face or limbs. The effects of electrical irritation, combined with those of destruction, more particularly of the postfrontal region, indicate that this part is related to the lateral movements of the head and eyes. Irrita- tion, as wa have seen, causes opening of the eyes, dilatation of the pupils, and conjugate deviation of the head and eyes to the oppo- site side. At the moment of destruction of this region in the one hemisphere there always occurs a temporary deviation of the head and eyes to the side of lesion. This, however, is only transient even when the destruction has been almost if not absolutely com- plete. In two experimespts which I have described," after bilateral destruction of the postfrontal area the animals were unable to turn the head or eyes to either side for a day after the operation. At first they were unable to look round when sounds were made in proximity to the ear ; or, if they did, they moved the trunk and head en masse. The removal of the prefrontal regions alone caused no discoverable physiological symptoms, either sensory or motor. But I found in several instances that after the symptoms which followed destruction of the postfrontal area had entirely disap- peared, the subsequent destruction of the prefrontal area induced paralysis of the head and eyes of exactly the same nature as before. I have confirmed these observations in a recent experiment. After apparently the most thorough cauterisation of the whole of the excitable frontal area, convex as well as mesial aspect, the animal, which at first exhibited marked distortion of the head and eyes to the side of lesion and inability to turn them to the opposite side, recovered within three days to such an extent that the defects were no longer perceptible. A month later, extirpation of the prefrontal region, in advance of the former lesion, induced the same condition as before, namely, deivation of the head and eyes to the side of lesion, and total inability to turn them to the opposite side. The conjugate devia- tion of the eyes continued for some time after the movements of the head had been recovered, but within three days no defect was any longer capable of being made out in this respect. These facts indicate that the prefrontal regions have the same functional re- lations as the postfrontal. The transitory duration of the sym- ptoms would be explained by the fact that the postfrontal centres were not entirely destroyed. It is difficult to remove the whole frontal area without inflicting injury on the head of the corpus striatum. In one case in which I removed the frontal lobe on both sides »> Kxperiments li) and 20, /'At7. Trans., Part ii., 1884. 146 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. tion of the muscular sense represents the highest degree of the hemiacgesthetic scale." He refers me also to cases of ansesthesia*® in which the sense of position or the limbs was entirely abolished and " yet the patients were able to move the affected members freely even when the eyes were closed. Under such conditions, however, the movements of the limbs deprived of the muscular sense are uncertain and hesitating." These and similar facts show that the sense of movement is not essential either to the due co-ordination or power of carrying a movement into effect. Vision may entirely replace the muscular sense, though, as one would naturally expect, volitional move- ments effected only through the aid of vision are, when the eyes are closed, less certain and precise that those which are accom- panied also by a sense of movement. Tet these defects are capable of being overcome in large msasure by practice; so that, even when the eyes are closed, the visual conception of the movement is capable of compensating entirely, or almost entirely, for the loss of the muscular sense. That this does not occur in all cases may be admitted, but the essential point is that it may in some, and one case of thie kind is sufflcient to demonstrate that volitional action is not necessarily bound up with sensations con- ditioned by the muscular action itself. It is conceivable that ideas of movements might be formed, and volitional movements effected by a brain consisting only of visual and motor centres. Under these circumstances, however, vision would be largely occupied in directing movements, and the range of muscular action and muscular adaptation would be infinitely less than if these were guided, also, by sensations generated by the movements themselves. By the so-called muscular sense, we are able to conceive and execute movements which we have never seen, but we are unable to conceive or volitionally execute move- ments which we have neither seen nor felt. But though, under ordinary conditions, the sensations of movement are the invari- able accompaniment of muscular action, and are repeated as often as the muscular action itself, this constant association does not imply that the one is dependent on the other, or that the musculo-sensory ideas of movement are the necessary or imme- diate excitants of the movement itself. Bastian holds that in addition to the conscious impressions which accompany muscular action, and which he admits may be, chiefly at least, localised in the falciform lobe, there are a set of unfelt impressions which guide the motor activity of the brain by *6 Diseases of Nervous System (Sydenham Society), vol. iii, pp. 304, 445, 463. TRE MOTOR CENTRES. 147 automatically bringing it into relation with the different degrees of contraction of all the muscles which may be in a state of action. To these unfelt impressions he gives the name " kin- sesthesis," and he considers that the motor centres are the seat of the "kin9B3thesis" or sense of movement. The so-called motor centres are, therefore, according to him, in reality sensory centres which excite the true motor centres of the spinal cord through the pyramidal tracts which connect them therewith. I cannot agree with Bastian in including in the muscular sense, which is so essentially an act of conscious discrimination, the mere afferent or unconscious impressions, through the agency of which the harmonious co-ordination of the different segments of the spinal cord and lower centres is secured, apart from the cerebral hemi- spheres ; nor do I think that impressions, which practically do not rise into consciousness, can be ideally revived or enter into the composition of ideas or conceptions of movement. But if it were the case, as Bastian assumes, that the ideal revival of kin- aesthetic impressions is the immediate excitant of the true motor centres in the spinal cord, it would follow that the so-called motor centres would be independent centres of activity, irre- spective of the stimuli from the sensory centres of the cortex. Experiments show, however, that the motor centres are not inde- pendent centres of action, for it has been found by Marique,*^ whose experiments have been confirmed by Exner and Paneth, ** that when the motor centres have been completely isolated, by section of the fibres which associate them with the sensorj' centres of the cortex, paralysis results of precisely the same character as that which occurs when they are actually extirpated. Marique proved that the same contractions were obtainable on electrical irritation of the respective centres after, as before, isolation, showing that they still retained their excitability and connection with the pyramidal tracts. These experiments indicate, there- fore, that the motor centres of the cortex are not independent centres of action, but act only in response to the stimuli which proceed from the sensory centres by way of the associating fibres which connect them together. If the true motor centres were situated only in the spinal cord, one would expect to find the spinal motor centres developed in correspondence with the motor capacities of the animal. In such case the spinal motor centres of man, in whom the motor capa- <' Centres Pxycho-moieum du Cerveau, 18S5. ** " VerBuche iiber die Fo1>{en der Durchschneidung von AssociationB-fasera • am Hundehlrn, Archivf. d. gex. Plujx., Ud. xliv, 1889. 148 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. bilities are most varied and most perfect, should be developed far beyond those of other animals, but precisely the opposite holds For relatively as compared with the brain, and relatively as com- pared with the size of the animal, the spinal motor centres of man are less developed than those of the lower animals; and they are absolutely lees than those of many animals whose capabilities are of the simplest order. The development of the spinal motor centres corresponds with that of the purely reflex synergic mus- cular combinations of the related metameres or body segments; while that of the cortical motor centres corresponds with the multiplicity and complexity of the motor faculties, volitional and cognitive. From the various considerations above advanced I conclude that the motor centres of the cortex are not the centres of tactile or general sensibility, nor are they the centres of the muscular sense, whether we regard this to depend on centripetal impressions, conscious or unconscious, or on a sense of innervation; but that they are motor in precisely the same sense as other motor centres, and, though functionally and organically connected, are anatomi- cally differentiated from the centres of sensation general, as well as special. Fhontax Centbes. The region of the brain which lies in advance of the Rolandic area and marked off by the precentral sulcus is one respecting the functions of which there is still considerable doubt. Anatomi- cally it is r.-lated to the motor tracts of the internal capaule. These tracts, according to the investigations of Flechsig, lie in the inner portion of the foot of the crus, and connect the frontal lobe with the opposite cerebellar hemisphere indirectly through the grey matter of the pons. Destructive lesions of the frontal centres, both of the postfrontal and prefrontal regions, as I have shown experimentally, cause descending degeneration of these tracts ^^ not capable of being followed beyond the upper part of the pons. The direction of the degeneration may be taken as a proof of the motor significancation of the regions in question. Similar degenera- tions have been described by Brissaud^" as the result of lesions of the frontal lobe in man. He has not been able to trace the dege- neration into the pyramid, and concludes that the internal tracts of the foot of the crus connect the frontal regions with the motor nuclei of the medulla. Degenerations in this part of the crus havo, according to his observations, been always associated with *9 See Fig. 122. Functions of the Brain. 50 Contraction Per manente des Hemiplegiques, 1880. THE FRONTAL CEXTRES. 149 psychical defects, apart from paralysis of the face or limbs. The effects of electrical irritation, combined with those of destruction, more particularly of the postfrontal region, indicate that this part is related to the lateral movements of the head and eyes. Irrita- tion, as wa have seen, causes opening of the eyes, dilatation of the pupils, and conjugate deviation of the head and eyes to the oppo- site side. At the moment of destruction of this region in the one hemisphere there always occurs a temporary deviation of the head and eyes to the side of lesion. This, however, is only transient even when the destruction has been almost if not absolutely com- plete. In two experim^qts which I havedescribed,'! after bilateral destruction of the postfrontal area the animals were unable to turn the head or eyes to either side for a day after the operation. At first they were unable to look round when sounds were made in proximity to the ear ; or, if they did, they moved the trunk and head en masse. The removal of the prefrontal regions alone caused no discoverable physiological symptoms, either sensory or motor. But I found in several instances that after the symptoms which followed destruction of the postfrontal area had entirely disap- peared, the subsequent destruction of the prefrontal area induced paralysis of the head and eyes of exactly the same nature as before. I have confirmed these observations in a recent experiment. After apparently the most thorough cauterisation of the whole of the excitable frontal area, convex as well as mesial aspect, the animal, which at first exhibited marked distortion of the head and eyes to the side of lesion and inability to turn them to the opposite side, recovered within three days to such an extent that the defects were no longer perceptible. A month later, extirpation of the prefrontal region, in advance of the former lesion, induced the same condition as before, namely, deivation of the head and eyes to the side of lesion, and total inability to turn them to the opposite side. The conjugate devia- tion of the eyes continued for some time after the movements of the head had been recovered, but within three days no defect was any longer capable of being made out in this respect. These facts indicate that the prefrontal regions have the same functional re- lations as the postfrontal. The transitory duration of the sym- ptoms would be explained by the fact that the postfrontal centres were not entirely destroyed. It is difficult to remove the whole frontal area without inflicting injury on the head of the corpus striatum. In one case in which I removed the frontal lobe on both sides »» Kxperiments Ifl and 20, I'hil. Trans., Part ii., 1884. 152 CEREBRAL LOCALISATION. character of experimental lesions, unilateral or bilateral, so far as relates to the sensory and motor faculties in general ; and in several a certain intellectual deficiency and instability of charac- ter have been observed, not unlike those occurring in monkeys and in dogs. Of fifty-seven cases of lesion of the frontal region, collected from various sources, in two there was conjugate deviation of the head and eyes ; twelve in which intelligence was specially impaired ; and in all a total absence of paralysis of the limbs. Though I have occupied so much of your time, I have only been able to treat of — and that in many respects very imperfectly — the functions of the cortical centres so far as concerns sensation and motion. There is another question which I have not con- sidered at all, namely, the relations of the cerebral hemispheres to the functions of organic life. This, however, is a subject which is still involved in so much obscurity, and in reference to which there are at present so few facts which are not suscep- tible of different modes of interpretation, that I think it well to wait for further light before hazarding any definite views of my own. And I feel it all the less necessary to do so, seeing that the subject in one of its principal aspects, namely, the rela- tion of the hemispheres to the thermic functions of the body, has been recently so ably placed before you by my predecessor, Dr. MacAlister. On the psychical aspects of cerebral localisation I have touched only incidentally. This of itself would require a volume, and that mainly of speculation. As to the questions vphich I have treated more fully, and on which so many differences of opinion at present exist, and will probably still continue, I shall be con- tent if the facts and considerations which I have broaght before you contribute to their solution, if only by stimulating work on the part of others, with a view to arriving at conclusions which shall be acceptable alike to physiologists and physicians. For the true conception of the functions and relations of the cerebral hemispheres, and their constituent centres is not only of the highest scientific and philosophical interest, but of direct and important practical bearing on the diagnosis and treatment of cerebral disease. London : Printed at the Office of the British Medical Assodation, 1,39, ,Strand. (h Ic QP3S5 F41 Copy ? Ferrier The Croonian lectures on cerebral ■Looalis at i i nn '^^