COLUMBIA LIBRARIES OFFSITE HEALTH SCIENCES STANDARD HX641 72880 x ,o/' RC1 26 .St6 Cholera, its protean RECAP By Dr. G. Archie rirBrSlHlRai I ■•aNS^',a}ifc,:!i., he may escape the malady alto- gether. He calls attention to the fact one seizure also renders individuals in some degree personally immune, though their aptitude for carrying the infection is in no way lost providing they have been exposed to its influence. While he declares his doubt whether — 24 — the cause is an organic poison or living organism, he is inclined to accept the mycetic theory which, as he remarks, " explains without strained effort why it is that fluids, and especially stagnant fluids, contain- ing more or less organic nutritious matter, are chief vehicles of the cholera germs, as they are of all proto- mycetic forms. It is on this account that the water of the soil, the drinking water, and every fluid, play so highly important a role in the diffusion of the dis- ease; and yet neither the ground water or the drink- ing water theories can ever prevail in sole soverignty as causes of the disease, since such are not necessary for the development of the germs, but only become so when they can furnish these germs with proper nutritious matter, when other favorable conditions of growth are presented, and when more especially the way of communication with the human organism is open. The germs of cholera may be spread without ground or drinking water just as easily as with them, through the air, by becoming attached to solid bodies, etc. . . . True, cholera finds in drinking water also a very frequent and most potent medium of dis- semination, as it may be impregnated with the poison (from water of the soil by filtration from privies and sewers) which may then flourish in further develop- ment; still drinking water alone cannot be considered as the exclusive or necessary means of dissemination. Over- flowing or badly cemented drainage or sewer pipes, for instance, conveying infectious matter, may — 25 — carry their foul contents directly into the ground walls of cellars, and dwellings, and swiftly develop destruction among the inhabitants." It is probable, however, the dejections do not when first expelled contain the cholera germs in the stage of development necessary to infection, but that they become strictly aggressive only after hav- ing undergone fermentation, which result is furthered by admixture with decomposing animal substances — and this is why the midden privy is always a greater source of danger than the modern closet. This theory is supported by numerous facts. Dr. O. D. Norton, a veteran practitioner of Cin- cinnati, who had extended experience with chol- era in the epidemic of 1849, remarks, regarding ex- periments with /Vr^-^ alvine excretions of "rice-water" character, that he and a confrere fed such by buckets- full to numerous chickens and pigs, but induced in them no evidences of the disease; on the contrary, these creatures seemed to "grow fatter " thereon.* The observations of C. von. Thiersch show that while recent dejections are not dangerous to animals, feeding the same with old excreta of the same sort invariably induces the malady, f Further, experience shows that physicians passing * Cincinnati Lancet-Clinic, vol. xxiv; Sept. 24th, 1892. f'Meine Cholera-Infectionsversuche vom Jahre, 1854, und die des Herrn Dr. B. J. Stokvis vom Jahre, 1866." Munich, 1867. — 26 — from bedside to bedside are comparatively immune. — Niemeyer says his experience in cholera epidemics, wherein he wrapped patients in blankets and often held them in his arms for some time, made him a "decided anti-contagionist;" that those who wash the body and bed linen after they have lain some time, are more apt to be infected than those who directly care for the patient, even to removing the dejecta. Again, Lebert says: " I have noticed in all epi- demics, and have seen it mentioned in the writings of many authors, that practicing physicians, even hospital physicians, are seldom attacked with cholera." In Cairo, Egypt, in 1831, of one hundred servants employed as rubbers or masseurs of cholera patients, not one was ever attacked; of eighty rubbers at the hospital at Mansurah, and sixty at Damietta, all escaped save one. None of the physicians or nurses of the cholera service at Constantinople in 1855-56, and Oran in r86i, ever suffered from any form of the disease. Washerwomen, whenever they wash linen soiled with cholera dejections, without any precautions, are at- tacked in all places in no small numbers.* In Branson, *The frequency with which washerwomen fall ill with the disease from contact with infected linen has often been mentioned, but there are also examples where cholera has been spread by rags and other objects. The same is true in still higher degree of unclean bedding. C. von Zehnder ascribes the origin of two cholera centres in the Ziirich epi- — 27 — in the Canton of Valais (Switzerland), in 1867, one of the Sisters of Charity nursed, with the greatest self- sacrifice, all the cholera patients in very filthy chambers, and yet remained healthy, but at the close of the epidemic " her sympathy prompted her to assist in washing up the soiled linen, when she was attacked with the disease and died. It was from a washer- woman, who died after washing the clothes of a cholera fugitive, that the epidemic developed later in Zurich, 1867." (Lebert.) Very numerous facts might be cited to demon- strate that cholera may be communicated, and carried from place to place, by clothing or other material soiled by cholera dejections; the observations of Etienne Moulin, Gaston Pellissier, Jas. Simpson, Jules Bucquoy, J. M. and D. D. Cunningham, Max von Pettenkofer, Antoine Fauvel, Augusto Guastella, and others, are most definite. Guastella remarksrf "■ There were persons living in places sheltered from the epi- demic who, after washing linen soiled with the dejec- tions of cholera, carried the disease afar." Fauvel adds other f actsj showing that camping places where an demic of 1867 to an accumulation of bedding, mattresses, pillows, etc., that had been used on the beds of cholera patients, and afterwards piled up, before being carried off for disinfection, in the neighborhood of the houses affected. — S. •f" D' igiene e medicina navale ad uso della marina merchantile." Trieste, 1861. I" Le Cholera; etiologie et prophylaxie." Paris, 1868. — 28 — epidemic has occurred, hospital wards, sick chambers, ships and cars carrying cholera patients, etc., may preserve for some time, under certain circumstances, the power of transmitting the disease; nevertheless, such examples are comparatively rare. To transmit cholera by clothing, he considers, demands certain conditions, viz.: "To transport it a short distance requires certain contact with objects in connection with the patients, especially those soiled by vomit and rectal discharges; to transport long distances, the ob- jects previously exposed to contact must be confined to close quarters where the fresh air is not renewed, and where sunlight does not enter. There are few examples of objects freely ventilated carrying the disease for any long time, or long distance, while there are many cases to prove that the transmission may easily occur where soiled effects have been closely packed for several months." As to the influence of dead bodies in disseminat- ing infection directly — i.