■- *3 •r Columbia SIn 1593, in company with his brother Robert, he commenced bachelor of divi- nity; in 1597, proceeded to his degi-ee of doctor in the same faculty ; and the same year was elected master of Uni- versity college. At this time he de- livered his tlieological preelections in the divinity school in Oxford, which he pub- lished the next year, with this title : ' QuJEstiones sex totidem prselectipnibus in Schola Theologica Oxonise, pro forma habitis, discussse et disceptatse a. 1597, in quibus e sacra Scriptura et Patribus antiquissimis quid statuendum sit de- finitum.' Oxon. 1598. 4to. Dedicated to Thomas Sackville, baron of Buckhurst, chancellor of the university of Oxford. Reprinted at Frankfort, 1616, under the superintendence of Abraham Scultetus. Upon March 6, 1599, he was installed in the deanery of Winchester, which he held till 1609, and in 1600 was elected vice-chancellor of the imiversity of Ox- ford, when he published his sermons on the prophet Jonah. Lond. 4to. 1600. The same year, on occasion of the cross in Cheapside being taken down, the citizens of London desired the advice of the two universities, whether or not it should be re-erected. Abbot had already distinguished himself in his new office in the university by the zeal with which he had destroyed all pictures connected with sacred subjects, and was therefore, as might be expected, opposed to the re- storation of the cross. " I remember," he says, in a letter addressed to the citi- zens on this subject, " in that college where I first lived, (Balliol,) a young man was taken praying and beating his ABB ABB breast before a crucifix in a window ; which caused the master and fellows to pull it down, and set up other glass ; which example makes us nothing doubt, but that the cross in Cheapside hath many in the twilight and morning early who do reverence before it. By all which I do conclude that it is a monu- ment of tlieir superstition ; a great in- ducement, and may be a ready way to idolatry." But the more moderate judgment of Whitgift, archbishop of Canterbmy, and Bancroft, bishop of London, prevailed ; the cross was repaired and restored, with some slight alterations. (See a pamphlet entitled, ' Cheapside Cross censured and condemned, by a Letter sent from the Vice-chancellor, &c. of Oxford.' 4to, London, 1641.) In 1603, having been again chosen vice-chancellor, he visited Woodstock with the celebrated William Laud, then proctor of the university, to congratulate king James, who had suc- ceeded on the 24th of March before to the crown of England ; and about this time commenced his difference with Laud, who maintained the perpetual visibility of the church, as derived from the apo- stles to the chiu-ch of Rome, in oppo- sition to Abbot, who, like Usher, had endeavom-ed to trace it from Beren- garius to the Albigenses, and from them to Luther and Calvin. These tenets of Laiid were extremely offensive to Abbot, who united with Dr. Airy, the vice-chan- cellor, in calling Laud to account for a sermon preached by him at St. Mary's, Oxford, in the year 1606, which con- tained expressions at variance with the Calvinistic and popular theology of the day. In 1604 Dr. Abbot was one of the eight Oxford divines engaged in the new translation of the Bible ; and the same year published his Answer to Dr. Thomas Hill, who had quitted the church of Eng- land, and embraced the Roman Catholic religion — ' The Reasons, which Dr. Hill hath brought for the upholding of Papis- try, unmasked,' &c. Oxon. 4to. 1604. In 1605 he was a third time vice-chan- cellor ; in 1608, his patron, Thomas Sackville, the earl of Dorset, died sud- denly at the council-chamber ; and Dr. Abbot, who had been his chaplain, preached and afterwards printed his fu- neral sermon. (London, 4to. 1608.) But the loss which he experienced in the death of this nobleman, was amply com- pensated by the esteem and friendship of George Hume, the earl of Dunbar, treasurer of Scotland, one of king James's VOL. I. 17 greatest favourites. This nobleman ap- pointed Dr. Abbot his chaplain, and car- ried him into Scotland, to assist in re-establishing episcopacy in that king- dom, and reducing it to uniformity. By the sagacity of the earl, and the mode- ration of his chaplain, the project so far succeeded, that an act was passed in the general assembly, which provided that the king should have the calling of all general assemblies ; that the bishops, or their deputies, should be perpetual moderators of the diocesan synods ; with other concessions greatly in favour of episcopacy. (Heylyn's History of the Presbyterians, pp. 381, 382.) Abbot's service in this affair was extolled by his zealous patron, who took every oppor- tunity of recommending him to the king's notice and favour ; and his efforts were advanced by the following circum- stance. Whilst he was in Scotland, George Sprot, a notary of Ayemouth, was con- demned and executed for having been concerned in the Gowry conspiracy. The execution of this man afforded an admirable opportunity for settling men's doubts as to the reality of the plot. A long accovmt of his execution and confession was published at London, with a nan-ative prefixed to it by Dr. Abbot, entitled, ' The Examinations, Arraignment, and Conviction of Geoi-ge Sprot, Notary, in Ayemouth ; written and set forth by Sir William Hart, &c. ; whereby appeareth the treasonable device betwixt John, earl of Gowry, and Robert Logane, of Restalrig (com- monly called Lesterig), plotted by them for the ci-uel murthering of our most gracious Sovereign.' To this treatise a Preface was prefixed (of 38 pp.) written by George Abbot, Doctor of Divinity, and Dean of Winchester, &c. 1608. This performance was very acceptable to the king, and paved the way to Abbot's preferment : for on the death of Dr. Overton, the bishop of Lichfield, Abbot was appointed to succeed him, and was consecrated on Dec. 3, 1609 ; and on the 20th of January following, he was trans- lated to the see of London, void by the death of Dr.Thomas Ravis ; and archbishop Bancroft dying shortly after. Abbot was chosen to succeed him. He was elected by the chapter of Canterbury, March 18, 1611, and consecrated in the chapel at Lambeth, April 9, by the bishops of Ox- ford, Ely, Lichfield, Worcester, and Chi- chester. The appointment was a great mortification to the pious, learned, and C ABB ABB moderate portion of the community, more especially to the English clergy, who had wished and expected that bishop An- drews or bishop Overall should have suc- ceeded Bancroft ; prelates beloved and admired by all pai'ties, of longer standing in the church, greater experience, and much greater learning. But the Scottish party warmly supported Abbot, and car- ried their point. " The bishop of Lon- don," says secretary Calvert, in a letter written at the time to Sir Thomas Ed- monds, " by a strong north wind coming out of Scotland, is blown over the Thames to Lambeth, the king having professed to tlie bishop himself, as also to the lords of his council, that it is neither the re- spect of his learning, his wisdom, nor his sincerity (although he is well persuaded there is not any one of them wanting in him), that hath moved him to prefer him before the rest of his fellows, but merely the recommendation of his faithfid ser- vant Dunbar, that is dead, whose suit on the behalf of the bishop he cannot, and will not suffer to lose his intention." (Birch's Negociation, &c. p. 338.) His predecessor, Bancroft, had acted with so much judgment and diligence in the con- troversies and discussions of these times, as to win applause even from those who were no friends to the church. (See Osborne's Memoirs, p. 61.) But Ab- bot was known to entertain very different sentiments. He was a rigid Calvinist ; had shov/n whilst at Oxford a marked and decided opposition to those who en- tertained different principles from his own. He had no experience as a bishop ; " He was not much beloved," says Fuller, "by the inferior clergy, as over rigid and austere. Indeed, he was mounted to command in the church before he ever learned policy therein ; made a shepherd of shepherds before he was a shepherd of sheep ; conseci'ated bishop before ever called to a pastoral charge : which made (say some) him not to sympathize with the necessities and infirmities of poor ministers." (Fuller's Ch. Hist. x. p. 87.) These observations of Fuller are borne out by the testimony of Bishop Hacket, no great friend to Bancroft or Laud ; who, speaking of Abbot's austerity in the High Commission Court, observes : " It was not so in his predecessor Ban- croft's days, who would chide strictly, but censure mildly. He considered that he sate there rather as a father than a judge. ' Et pro peccato magno paululum supplicii satis esse putavit.' He knew that a pastoral staff was made to reduce IS a wandering sheep, not to knock it down." And in another place he ob- serves : " That sentences (in that comt) of great correction, or rather destruction, have their epocha from his predominancy in that court." (Life of Williams, p. 97.) This promotion of Abbot, cai'ried by a party by no means favourable to the interests of the clergy, was part of that WTetched policy prevailing in this and the previous reign, which at- tempted to neutrahze the power of the church by promoting men of opposite sentiments. " The two contrary fac- tions at court," says Osborne, " one of them thinking all things fit to be destroyed, the other labouring to pre- serve, did, upon the vacancy of every bishopric, put one in suitable to their humoiu-s that had the luck to prevail. The cavise the present incumbent (Abbot) did, like the web of Penelope, unravel Avhat his predecessor had with more policy and charity twisted." The consequence of such policy was this ; that the best cler- gymen were driven to despair, and knew not how to proceed. They who endea- voured to promote a reconciliation were suspected by both parties ; and the divi- sions thus promoted in the church, branched forth into the city and country into divers popular differences. Nor was Abbot's conduct on his pro- motion to this high station of such a nature as was likely to remove the fears entertained of his prudence and modera- tion ; for in the first year of his appoint- ment he used all his influence with lord chancellor Elsmere, then chancellor of the university of Oxford, to oppose any of Laud's preferment in the university, "in- sinuating that he was at best a papist in heart, and cordially addicted unto po- pery ;" and " that if he were suffered to have any place of government in the university, it would imdoubtedly turn to the great detriment of religion and dis- honom- of his lordship." ( Hey lyn's Laud, p. 61.) In 1611, when Vorstius was invited bv the ciuators of the university of Leyden to accept the professorship of divinity, the archbishop used his influence with the king to induce him to interfere, and to com- mand Sir Ralph Win wood, the ambassador at the Hague, to protest against the recep- tion of Vorstius. (Wuiwood's Papers, iii. 296, 317.) On Easter-day, 1612, he con- firmed prince Charles ; and the same year attended prince Henry in his last sickness, and preached his funeral ser- mon (Ps. Ixxxii. 6). The next year he ABB ABB solemnized the marriage between the princess Elizabeth, daughter of James I., and Fredei-ic, the elector palatine, who was so well satisfied with the archbishop's attentions, that, on leaving the kingdom, he made him a present of plate to the amount of 1,000/. Nor was Abbot un- grateful for this kindness ; for when in the year 1619 the elector accepted the crown of Bohemia, the archbishop used all his influence with the king to induce him to support his son-in-law ; and advised the king and his council to countenance this usurpation against all the world. (See his Letter to Naunton in the Cabala, p. 102, and in the Biog. Brit. — art. Abbot ; the original is in the Bodleian.) In the year 1613 he was nominated one of the fii-st sixteen governors of the Charter-house, of which the foundation ■was then settled ; and the same year, together with the bishops of London (King), Winchester (Bilson), Lichfield (Neyle), Rochester (Buckeridge), and several laymen, was one of the commis- sioners appointed to try the case of di- vorce between lady Frances Howard, daughter to the earl of Suffolk, and Ro- bert, earl of Essex, her husband. All the other ecclesiastical commissioners, except the archbishop and the bishop of London, gave sentence in favour of lady Essex. To justify, therefore, his own opinion, the archbishop drew up a paper, entitled, ' Some observable things since Sept. 25, 1613, when the sentence was given in the cause of the Earl of Essex,' &c. : reprinted in 1719 under a different title. This paper the king himself re- solved to answer, and wrote a very sen- sible letter to the archbishop ; in which he told him, that after he had considered all his papers, he found his principles so strange, and his doubts so far sought, that he could not but think that the prejudice the archbishop entertained towards the persons was the chief cause of his doubts. " In your last speeches with me," he pro- ceeds, " you remember you told me what assurance you had of the earl's ability out of his own mouth, which you said you could not but trust because he was so religious a nobleman. But when I told you of the other party's contrary affirmation, you remember how you used the word iniquity. Now, then, I would ask you, what proof you have of the one's religion more than the other's ; you must answer me by judging upon the exterior ; and how deceivable that guess is, daily ex'perience teaches us." The 19 king was a better judge of characters than the archbishop, for the earl became a traitor in the succeeding reign. Both the archbishop and Dr. King, who voted with him, were too much influenced by their feelings. The earl was a puritan ; his countess related to the strictest and most influential popish families in the kingdom. Bishop Goodman tells us that after the sentence of nidlity had passed, he went to Overall and asked his opinion concerning it ; who told him that he had been with the 4jishop of London, Dr. King, to expostulate with him for joining with Dr. Abbot in opposing it, seeing things were so manifest according to the laws of the church. To this Dr. King replied that his only reason for dis- sent was this — that whereas many things were proved upon oath, yet he could not satisfy his own conscience for the truth of those oaths, though he could not disprove them ; but if his own conscience could have been persuaded that the oaths were true, then, without exception, the nullity must needs follow. " There, then," (says Goodman, and his words apply to both prelates,) " was my lord bishop's mis- take ; that either he did not desire fur- ther time to examine those oaths, or otherwise, according to the custom of law, that he had not judged secundum allegata et probata." (^lemoirs, p. 222. Compare also the remarks of L'Estrange, a writer of great moderation. Reign of King Charles, p. 118.) In the year 1614, when the House of Commons had harshly refused to supply the king's necessities, the archbishop, upon the expiring of the convocation, consulted with some of the bishops to raise a loan among themselves, and pre- sent it to the king as a free-will offering, in testimony of their duty. Every bishop resolved to send unto the king the best piece of plate in his possession, the archbishop setting the example ; and such as had not a piece of plate sufficient to express their zeal, sent in a smaller piece, but filled with gold, to make it a present of reasonable value. (See the Archbishop's Letter addressed to the Bishop of Norwich, in Mr. Brewer's Il- lustrations of the Court of King James I. i. 157). The same year, in order to satisfy the Romanists of the validity of the English ordinations, he as- sembled several of the Romish priests then in England, and placed in their hands the original records of Archbishop Parker's consecration. (Champnseus in Epist. Ded. Georgio Abboto.) In 1G16 C2 ABB ABB he assisted at the creation of Cliarles prince of Wales ; and the same year was very earnest in bringing into England Antonio de Dominis, the archbishop of Spalato. This prelate having espoused the cause of the Venetians in their quarrel with the pope, was, on their mutual reconciliation, desirous of finding an asylum in England. For this purpose he applied to Sir Dudley Carleton, then am- bassador at Venice, expressing liis wish to live and die a member of the Church of England, (which he esteemed above all others,) and to obtain him some small means of support. The ambassador sub- mitted the archbishop's request to the king, who thought that the quarrel of the pope and the Venetians had been the effect of his book in defence of the oath of allegiance ; and therefore entered more heartily into the design of receiving De Dominis. The king acquainted the archbishop of Canterbury with it, who showed his heartiness in the cause by contributing towards a pension for De Dominis, and readily offered him lodging and diet at his own house at Lambeth. (Goodman's Memoirs, i. 157.) The same year saw the commencement of the archbishop's troubles ; for Dr. Mocket, his domestic chaplain, warden of All-Souls, published a work entitled 'Doc- trina et Politeia Ecclesiae Anglicanee,' &c. 1616, 4to. It contained a Latin transla- tion of the English Liturgy, Catechism, Thirty-nine Articles, the Book of Ordina- tion of Bishops, Priests and Deacons, a Latin abridgment of the Homilies ; and an original treatise ' De Politeia,' &c. It was published abroad, at Amsterdam, and is mentioned in terms of strong reproba- tion by Grotius in a letter to Vossius. (" Prodiit de Politia Anglicana libellus puritanissimus, Amstelodami cusus : sed mutata est Epigrapha : credo ne urbs ilia in Britannia infamaretm-. Video idem illorum et eorum qui nos exercent esse ingenium, contemnere vetustatem et sanctimoniam ponere in Ecclesiae dilace- ratione." Epist. Remons. p. 475.) The work had been undertaken with the best intentions, but the author's inclination to Calvinism had so far swayed his judg- ment, that his abridgment of the Homilies was more in conformity with his own than the sense of the Chmxh. He had omitted part of the 20th Article ; but that which gave the greatest offence, was his claiming a power of the archbishop of Canterbury for confirming the election of bishops in his province, on the ground of the canon in the Nicene council, which 20 had been confirmed by an imperial edict; thus giving an obliging force to the canon and civil law, " both which (says Fuller) if crossing the common law of the land, are drowned in their passage as they sail over from Calais to Dover." Such an in- fringement of his prerogative was very distastefid to the king ; and his displeasvire towards this book was augmented by James Montague, the bishop of Win- chester, a prelate of great influence, who had hitherto supported the archbishop. The book was publicly burnt, which censiu'e the author took so much to heart, that he shortly after died. It was genei'ally conceived, says Heylyn, (Life of Laud, p. 76, and in this statement he is partly supported by Fuller,) " that as the book fared the worse for the au- thor's, so the author did not speed the better for his patron the archbishop's sake, betwixt whom and Dr. James Mon- tague, then bishop of Winchester, there had been some differences, which the rest of the court bishops were apt enough to make some use of to his disadvantage." Shortly after the archbishop had the mis- fortune to lose his bi'other, the bishop of Salisbmy, between whom and himself (if Heylyn may be trusted) there had hap- })ened some differences a little previous to lis death. These unhappy circumstances, and his growing infirmities, fixed the archbishop in his resolution of putting in force a design which he had for some time contemplated of building a hospital in his native town of Guilford, which he honoured with his presence, when Sir Nicholas Kempe laid the first stone of it, April 5, 1619. Hitherto he had but tasted misfortune; he was now to drain it and wring it out to the dregs. In 1621, whilst taking a jour- ney into Hampshire, the archbishop was invited by Lord Zouch to hunt in Brams- hill Park. Pretending to be a woodman, he took up a cross-bow to make a shot at a buck, but unhappily hit the keeper, who had run in among the herd of deer to bring them up to a fairer mark. The arrow pierced the left arm, and di- viding the large auxiliary vessels, caused instantaneous death. " He never spake after," says Fuller, " as the person still alive at Croydon, Avho brought off his body, infonned me." This untoward event caused the greatest consternation — the like had never happened in the church of England ; it was a sore affliction to many good men, who lamented the scandal which must by this untoward accident inevitably fall upon the chmxh; for ABB A B B in the eye of general councils and the canon law the archbishop was wonder- ftilly tainted and made incapable of per- forming any sacred function. By the common law, his personal estate was for- feited to the king, who graciously sent him a letter under his own hand, " that he would not add affliction to his sorrow, nor take one farthing from his chattels and moveables." (Hacket, 65.) But the scandal brought upon the church was not so readily removed; it was a subject of discourse in the foreign universities, and after three sevei-al disputations was declared by the Sorbonnists to amovmt to a positive irregularity. To add to the difficulty, four bishops elect were wait- ing for their consecration — Dr. Williams elect of Lincoln, Dr. Davenant of Salis- bury, Dr. Gary of Exeter, Dr. Laud of St.David's; all of whom, except Davenant, who was imder personal obligations from tlie archbishop, scrupled to have his hands laid upon them, and declined his consecration ; " not out of enmity or superstition (says Hacket, p. 66) but to be wary, that they might not be attainted with the contagion of his scandal and uncanonical condition." To determine the question and settle men's minds, the king directed a com- mission on the 3d of October to the lord keeper, (Williams,) the bishops of London, (Mountague,) Winchester, (Andrews,) and Rochester, (Buckeridge ;) to the elects of Exeter, (Gary,) and St.David's, (Laud;) Sir Henry Hobart, lord chief justice of the common jileas ; Sir John Doddridge, one of the justices of the king's bench ; Sir Henry Martin, dean of the ai-ches ; and Dr. Steward, a civi- lian. The three following questions were submitted to their decision. 1. Whether the archbishop wey-e irre- gular by the fact of involuntary homicide ? The two judges and two civilians held the negative ; the others lield that he was- irregular, except bishop Andrews, who said that he could not conclude so. 2. Whether the act might tend to a scandal in a churchman ? — Bishop Andrews, Sir H. Hobart, and Dr. Steward, doubted ; the rest concurred that there might arise from such an accident ' scandalum accep- tum non datum.' 3. How the archbishop should be restored, in case he should be found irregular ? All agreed that it could be no otherwise than by restitution from the king ; but they dissented in the m.anner of its being done. Andrews, Hobart, and Steward thought it should be done immediately from the king, and 21 from him alone, in the same patent with the pardon; Williams, Mountague, Buck- eridge, Gary, and Laud, wished that a commission should be directed by the king to some bishops, to absolve him 'manu clericali;' Doddridge and Martin agreed in having it done both ways, for the greater caution. The latter suggestion was adopted ; for the king, under his broad seal, granted the archbishop a full and entire pardon, and restored him to all metropolitical authority ; and on the 22d of Nov. issued a commission to the bishops of Lincoln, (Williams,) London, (Momitague,) Winchester, (Andrews,) Norwich, (Harsnet,) Lichfield and Co- ventry, (Morton, )Bath and Wells, (Lake,) Ely, (Felton,) Ghichester, (Garleton,) to grant the archbishop a dispensation in full form ; which was done upon the 12th of Dec. following, 1621. But though the archbishop was thus absolved, Williams and the others still scrupled at receiving consecration from his hands ; and the king therefore permitted them (a few days before issuing the above commission) to be otherwise consecrated; Williams in king Henry VIL's chapel, at Westminster, Nov. 1 1 ; Gary and Laud in the chapel of the bishop of Lon- don's palace, Nov. 18. The bishops who performed the ceremony were — London, (Mountague,) Worcester,(Thornborough,) Ely, (Felton,) Oxford, (Howson,) Llan- daff, (Godwin.) Thus was the arch- bishop absolved from this unhappy busi- ness, chiefly by the influence of Andrews, whom he suspected for his greatest foe, but who proved eventually his most firm and eflPectual friend ; mildly checking those who inveighed most against him, by saying, " Brethren, let us not be too hasty in condemning any for imcanonicalness according to the strictness thereof, lest we all render oiU"selves in the same con- dition ; besides, we all know, 'canones qui dicunt lapsos post actam pcenitentiam ad clei'icatimi non esse restituendos de rigore loquuntur disciplinae non injiciunt desperationem indulgentise.' " (See Wil- kins,. Goncil. iv. 462. Hacket's Life of Williams, p. 66. Spelman's Reliquiae, p. 121 ; — where the arguments urged by the different parties are given in detail ; and GoUier's Ecclesiastical Hist. ii. 720, who is astonished at the irregularity of the means by which Abbot was restored.) The archbishop, who had retired to Guilford during the progress of these debates, now returned to Lambeth and resumed his functions, contrary to the sense of many learned and pious men, ABB ABB who thought that he should have spent the remainder of his days in privacy. And such appears to have been his own feeHngs at the first, since (before his acquittal) he petitioned the king to be permitted to retire and spend the remainder of his days at his own almshouse at Guilford. (Howel's Letters, p. 123.) He also instituted a monthly Tuesday fast, in memory of this accident ; and allowed the widow of the man an annviity of 201. In Jan. 1623, together with Dr. Moun- tague, the bishop of London, he conse- crated St. James's church in Aldgate ; and the same year signed the ratification of the Spanish match. Against the tolera- tion contemplated in the articles of this treaty, a letter was afterwards circulated in his name. But this letter or speech (for in contemporary copies it is called sometimes by one and sometimes the other name) is unquestionably a forgery, as both Hacket and Heylyn have clearly proved. It was first printed in this coimtry by the no- torious Prynne, from a copy in the French Mercmy, (Hidden Works, p. 39; copied thence into the Cabala and various other works, thirty years after the event, and twenty years after the author's death.) Its original has never been found ; no two copies of it agree ; it is not mentioned by the archbishop's con- temporaries, nor in his own nan-ative ; it is entirely at variance with his act of signing the articles of the Spanish match : and he who had the boldness to address king James in the language attri- buted to him in this letter, woidd not have scrupled at openly refusing to sign the articles, had he disliked them ; since it is well known that at the very time when they were debated, the king was so per- plexed, and the lords so in-esolute, that the least show of opposition on the part of the archbishop woidd have decided the question. If the letter be genuine, we can scarcely acquit the archbishop of tergiversation, a fault from which he was to all appearance entii-ely fi-ee. In the year 1626, though much broken down in health, and suffering severely from the gout, he assisted at the coro- nation of Charles I. ; but his growing in- firmities, and probably a dislike to the dominant party, kept him away from the court. In his narrative, (which is pi-inted in Rushworth,) he says, " I cannot deny that the indisposition of my body kept me from coiu-t, and thereby gave occasion to maligners to traduce me, as withdrawing myself fi-om public 22 services, and therefore misliking some courses that were taken ; which obstinacy perhaps neither pleased the king, nor the great man [Buckingham, I suppose] that set them on foot. It is true that in the turbulency of some things I had no great invitements to draw me abroad, but to possess my soul in patience, till God sent fairer weather; but the true ground of my abstaining from solemn and public places was the weakness of my feet, proceeding from the gout ; which disease being hereditary unto me, and having possessed me now nine years, had debilitated me more and more, so that I could not stand at all, neither coidd I go up or down a pair of stairs ; but besides my staft' I must have the ser\'ice of one at least of my men, which was not fit to be admitted in every place Avhere I was to come." These causes induced the king, upon the 9th of Oct. 1627, to issue a com- mission to the bishops of Durham, (Neale,) Rochester, (Buckeridge,) Ox- ford, (Howson,) and Bath and Wells, ( Laud) , to execute archiepiscopal jurisdic- tion in the place of the archbishop : " For- asmuch as the said archbishop cannot at this present in his own person attend the services which are otherwise proper for liis cognizance and jurisdiction, and which as archbishop of Canterbury he might and ought in his own person to have performed and executed in causes and matters ecclesiastical, in the proper function of archbishop of that province, we therefore of our regal powei", and of our princely care and providence that nothing shall be defective in the order, discipline, government or right of the church, have thought fit by the service of some other learned and reverend bishops, to be named by us, to supply those things which the said archbishop ought or might in the cases aforesaid to have done, but for this present cannot perfomi the same." The act is printed in Rushworth, i. 431. The only reason assigned in this docu- ment for the archbishop's suspension was his present inability for pei-forming his functions ; a fact fully admitted by himself in his own narrative. It appears also that this suspension was only temporary, for such time as his inability lasted ; — two circumstances very necessary to be borne in mind. For two different causes are alleged for this proceeding ; one by the archbishop himself in his own naiTative, resting on his own suspicion, and some court scandal (as he confesses, Naitative, ABB ABB •p. 437) — a refusal to license a sermon of Dr. Sibthorpe's, entitled ' Apostol- ical Obedience,' containing sentiments Avhich the archbishop disliked. " This sermon was brought unto the duke," he says, " when it came into his head, or was suggested unto him by some malicious person, that thereby the archbishop might be put to some remai'kable strait. For if the king shoidd send the sermon unto him, and command him to allow it to the press, one of these two things would follow ; that either he should au- thoi'ize it, and so all men that were in- different should discover him for a base and unworthy beast (!) ; or he should refuse it, and so should fall into the king's indignaton, who might pursue it at his pleasure, as against a man tliat was contrary to his service. Out of tliis fountain flowed all the water that after- wards so wet." Such was the archbishop's surmise, resting only on suspicion, and upon an observation of Lord Conway, a creature of the duke's. The archbishop's suspicion is scarcely probable ; for had it been the real reason, it is not likely that Conway would have revealed it to the archbishop. Had the duke been desirous of displacing Abbot, he had a much plainer and easier course. Tlie groimds for liis suspension, mentioned in the com- mission, were simple and obvious, and involved much less odium. Another rea- son assigned is by Fuller, (mistaking, ap- parently, the authority of L'Estrangc, in his Life of Charles L p. 69) : " A commission," he says, " was granted nnto five bishops (whereof Bishop Laud of the quorum) to suspend Archbisliop Abbot from exercising his authority any longer, because uncanonical for casual homicide." And in his Appeal of Injured Innocence, defending himself against some remarks of Heylyn for this inac- curacy in saying that Bishop Laud was of the quorum, Fuller observes that he used that word not in its legal strictness, and then justifies his assertion by the following anecdote : that " when the writing for the archbishop's suspension was to be subscribed by the bishops aforesaid, the four seniors, London, Durham, Rochester, and Oxford, all declined to set their hands thereunto, and seemingly at the last showed much reluctance and regret thereat. ' Then give me the pen,' said Bishop Laud ; and though last in place, Jirst subscrib'^'l his name. Encouraged by whose words ai.d example, the rest after some demur did the like. This was attested to me by him who had best 23 cause to know it, the good and credible register, still alive, who attended in the place upon them." This, though a very positive statement, is certainly in-' accurate. There was no commission of this kind ever issued : the archbishop was removed directly by the king ; and the commission by which the king sus- pended him, and delegated his archi- episcopal powers to the bishops above named, is still in existence. This anec- dote, therefore, respecting Laud is utterly false, or else some misrepresentation. The suspension was of brief duration ; for about Christmas, 1628, the arch- bishop was restored to favour, at the re- quest of the House of Lords, who made suit to the king to receive him into grace, (L 'Estrange, 81.) The king as- sented, sent for the archbishop to come to court, and appointed the archbishop of York and the earl of Dorset to receive him as he came out of his barge. They conducted him to the king, who, giving him his hand to kiss, enjoined him not to fail the council-table twice a-week ; and ft-om henceforth he continued to sit in parliament in the exercise of his juris- diction till the day of his death, (lb. p. 95.) Upon the Friday after his return, tlie bishops met him at his house in Lambeth, in order to settle the contro- versies occasioned by a letter which Dr. Richard Mountague had addressed to the archbishop. Towards the latter period of his life he seems to have recovered his health, for this year he consecrated Richard Mountague bishop of Chichester, attended his pai-liamentary duties, and spoke at a conference held between the lords and commons on the petition of right (Ilushworth, i. 54G) ; and in 1632, tlie year before his death, the following pleasing anecdote of him is introduced in a MS. letter in the British Museum, from J. Pory to Sir Thomas Puckering, dated Sept. 20, 1632: "One day the last week, my lord of Anmdel, and his son, my lord Maltravers, having espied my lord of Canterbury's coach on Barn- sted Down coming towards theirs, before they came a butt's length short of it, both their lordships alighted and went a great pace towards his grace's coach, who, when they were approached, said, ' What ! and must my lord marshal of England take so great pains to do me so much honour ? Were my legs as good as my heart, I should have met your lord- ships the better half of the way.' Then my lord of Arundel replied, ' It might well become an earl marshal to give so ABB ABB much respect to an archbishop of Can- terbury ; ' besides the particular obliga- tion from his lordship to his grace, for his noble usage of his son and daughter Maltravers, while they were his pri- soners. His grace by his diet hath so moderated his gout, as it is now rather an infirmity than a pain. He looks fresh and enjoys his health, and hath his wits and intellectuals about him. So that if any other prelate do gape after his benefice, his grace perhaps, accoi'ding to the old and homely proverb, [may] eat of the goose which shall graze upon his grave." (Harl. MSS. 7,000.) He died next year, on Sunday, Aug. 4, 1633, at his palace of Croydon, aged 71 ; and was buried, as he had desired to be, in the lady chapel of Trinity church, at GuUford, in Sm'rey. Soon after his death, a monmnent was erected over his grave with his effigy, and a Latin in- scription engraved on his tomb. Besides building the hospital at Guilford, he gave to the schools in Oxford 150/, In 1619, he bestowed a large sum of money on the library of Balliol college, for aug- menting the number of the books and re- pairing the building ; and built a conduit in the city of Canterbury. In 1624, he contributed to the founding of Pembroke college, and discharged a debt of 300/. owing to that society from Balliol col- lege. In 1632, he gave 100/. to the library of University college ; and by his will, left to the town of Guilford 100/., to be lent without interest to four poor tradesmen of that town, for two or three years. To the poor of the town he left 20/. ; to the poor of Lambeth, 30/. ; to forty of his inferior servants, 1 01. each ; besides 40/. for those who had served him, in case he had forgotten them. All the books in his great study marked with his name, to his successors for ever ; those at Croydon, partly to the dean and chapter of Winchester, partly to the dean and chapter of Canterbiuy. (See his will, printed at the end of his Life, in 8vo.) Like many prelates of his day, he was never man-ied, and seems to have had a natural antipathy to women. He was extremely offended with his brother for having man-ied after he had become a bishop. And one day (as Fuller tells us in his Appeal, &c.) returning in his coach to Croydon, from which he had been some time absent, many people, most women, some of good quality, partly from good-will, partly from curiosity and novelty, crowded about his coach to see 24 him. Tlie archbishop, unwilling to be gazed at, and never partial to females, exclaimed, somewhat churlishly, " What makes these women here?" " You had best," said one of them, " shoot an arrow at us." In his private chai'acter he was sin- cere and honest, courteous to those who loved him and entertained the same religious principles as himself. But in general there was some moroseness in his manners ; and so prejudiced was he against those whose theological tenets differed from his own, that when the celebrated Grotius came to England in 1613, the archbishop could see nothing to admire or praise in him, describing him as no better than a smatterer and a pedant. (See his Letter in Winwood's Mem. iii. 459.) The same prejudices blinded him to the merits of Laud, Cosins, Neile, or others, and prompted him to join the Commons and others against them and those who adopted their sen- timents. In his station as the greatest prelate of the realm, his conduct was pro- ductive of much injiu-y to the church. " His extraordinary remissness," says L'Estrange, " in not exacting strict con- formity to the prescribed orders of the church in points of ceremony, seemed to resolve those legal detenninations to their first principle of indifterency, and led in such a habit of inconformity, as the future reduction of those tender-consci- enced men to long-discontinued obedi- ence was interpreted an innovation." (Reign of K. Charles, p. 131.) This is the mild censure of one whose theological principles resembled those of the arch- bishop. In this all his contemporaries agree, of whatever party or principle — • Hacket, Fuller, Osbenie, Clarendon, San- derson, Goodman, Heylyn, and others ; and the justice of their censure is seen in the archbishop's acts, as it might have been gathered long before from statements laid down in his writings, particularly in his answer to Hill. And however men may differ in the estimate of his cha- racter, one thing is certain, that had a man of his principles succeeded him, the chmxh of England, if it had existed, woidd have existed only as a monument of disorder and confusion. (See Dr. White Rennet's manuscript collections in the British Museum, No. Ixxxix. passim, for some particulars of Abbot, not mentioned in the general biographies. Besides the works already mentioned, he was the author of ' An Exposition on the Prophet Jonah.' Oxford, 1600. 4to. ABB ABB A Form of Absolution given in his cliapel at Lambeth to the marquess of Huntly, July 7, 1616, and his Letter to the Arch- bishop of St. Andrew's, in excuse for so doing, (Spotswood's Hist. 526, 528.) Letter to his Suffragans on the erection of Chelsea College, in Fuller's C. H. His correspondence with Sir Nat. Brent, then at Venice, respecting Sarpi's History of the Council of Trent, published by Dr. L. Atterbury, in a pamplet, entitled, ' Some Letters relating to the History of the Council of Trent.' 4to. 1705. A letter to Cyril, patriarch of Alexandria, Nov. 17, 1617, in Pagitt's Christianogra- phy, App. p. 213. ' A brief Description of the whole World, wherein is pai-ti- cularly described all the Monarchies,' &c. London, 4to. 1617; of which there have been many editions. A Treatise of the Perpetual Visibility of the Church ; London, quarto. 1624. His Nan-ative, published in Rushworth. The authen- ticity of this work is ascertained by quotations made from the original MS. by bishop Hacket, in his Life of Williams, i. 68, ii. 5, 19, &c. History of the Mas- sacre in the Valtoline, printed at the end of Foxe's Martyrs. His Judgment of Bowing at the Name of Jesus ; 1632, 8vo. Some Letters and Papers unpub- lished, in the MSS. of the Lansdowne and Harleian Collection. Printed Letters in Winwood, the Cabala, in the 2d vol. of Mr. Brewer's Illustrations of the Reign of James I. ABBOT (Robert), elder brother to George Abbot, archbishop of Canter- bury, was born in the year 1560, in the same house, and educated in the same school, with his brother. Upon an ora- tion made by him on the 17th of Nov. the day of queen Elizabeth's inaugu- ration, he was chosen scholar of Balliol College, and was sent to the university in 1575. (Featley, in Fuller's Abel Red. p. 540.) In 1581 he was elected fellow of his college ; the next year proceeded to his degree of master of arts ; and having entered into holy orders, was for some time the lecturer in St. Martin's church in Oxford, and at Abingdon in Berkshire. Upon a sermon preached by him at Worcester, he was made lectiu-er of that city ; and soon after, in 1588, rector of All Saints' in the same place, at which time he resigned his fel- lowship. About this period, or shortly after, he was presented to the rich bene- fice of Bingham in Nottinghamshire, by John Stanhope, esq. for a sennon which he had preached at Paul's 25 Cross. In 1594 he obtained some cele- brity as an author, for a book which he published against a Romanist, entitled, ' The Mirror of Popish Subtilities ; disco- vering certain wretched and miserable Evasions and Shifts, which a secret cavil- ling Papist, in the behalf of one Paul Spence, hath gathered out of Saunders and Bellarmine, concerning the Sacra- ments,' &c. London, 1594, 4to. In 1597 he was made a doctor of divinity ; in 1601 he published 'The Exaltation of the Kingdom and Priesthood of Christ, being a collection of Sermons on the First Part of the 110th Psalm,' (London, 1601, 4to.) which he dedicated to bishop Babington. When king James ascended the throne of England, he appointed Dr. Abbot his chaplain in ordinary, and was so much pleased with his treatise, ' Antichristi Demonstratio contra fabulas Pontificias et ineptam Rob. Bellarmini de Antichristo disputationem,' (London, 1603, 4to.) that he commanded his own Commentary on the Apocalypse to be appended to the second edition of this treatise, which ap- pearedin 1 608, 8vo. The king, whose judg- ment was excellent, and his proficiency by no means despicable in theological dis- cussions, was not mistaken in the opinion which he had formed of this work, for, if we may trust Dr. Featley, it was highly esteemed and commended by that mirror of learning and piety, the most admirable bishop Andi-ews. (Abel Red. p. 540.) But the most leai-ned and elaborate work which Dr. Abbot ever published, was his 'Defence of the Reformed Catholic of Mr. William Perkins, lately deceased, against Dr. Bishop, Seminary Priest ;' of which the first part appeared, London, 1606, 4to ; the second in 1607, and the third in 1609. To this work he added a parti- cular treatise, entitled, 'The true, ancient Roman Catholic;' dedicated to prince Henry ; for which the prince returned him a letter of thanks written by his own hand. In 1609, by the influence of arch- bishop Bancroft, says Dr. Featley, he was unanimously elected master of Bal- liol college, an appointment in which the archbishop's judgment was clearly seen, and for Avhich Abbot was admi- rably well adapted. He was a man of moderate and even temper, though a strict disciplinarian ; of warm and unos- tentatious piety, without that alloy of austerity which made his brother the archbishop so unpopular ; less of a rigid Calvinist, though inclined to the Calvinistic theology, and throughout his life actively engaged in opposing men ABB ABB who had written against it. He was rather, indeed, a captive to the trammels of the system from edncation than from choice, like Davenant and others ; and like them he suffered his better judg- ment to be swayed by the authority of great names, persuaded beforehand that their doctrines were the doctrines of the catholic church ; receiving them as such without sufficient examination, and with the same temper of mind opposing any thing which seemed at variance with them, rather because it was at variance with that which he had been taught to believe was true, and was the doctrine of those he had been taught to revere, tlian from any innate unsoundness or re- pugnancy to catholic antiquity. As the head of a college, no man could furnish a more excellent example ; by the firm- ness and moderation of his conduct, he reduced the society, which had fallen into the greatest irregidarity under the regimen of his predecessor, into order and unanimity. He was careful, not only for the learning and piety of those committed to his charge, but likewise for their ease and personal comfort ; regulat- ing their expenses, and teaching them good husbandry and habits of thriftiness, no mean part of good divinity. He followed his own lessons of piety, and taught them as much by example as by ju'ecept, never absenting himself from the college chapel, morning or evening, though the moi-nings were never so dark, or the season bitter. In May 1610 he was appointed one of the fellows of Chelsea college, then newly founded, and intended for a school of conti'oversial divinity ; and in November the same year was made pre- bendary of Normantown in the church of Southwell. The same year he pub- lished a Sermon, preached in St. Mary's church at Oxford, entitled, 'The Old Way ;' which he dedicated to archbishop Bancroft. At the latter end of the year 1611, on the death of Dr. Holland, rec- tor of Exeter college, Dr. Abbot was appointed the regius professor of divi- nity, preferred to this appointment (on the authority of Dr. Heylyn), by the power and favour which his brother the archbishop enjoyed with the king. (Life of Laud, p. 66.) In describing the cha- racters of the two professors. Dr. Featley tells us " that they were both of extraor- dinary learning and immense reading ; yet might it be truly said of Abbot, ' variam lectionem habuit in numerato' — he had the command of his learning, 26 and could bring it to bear upon whatever subject he was engaged in. Not so his predecessor : the hearers of the one always received from him what they ex- jjected, but the auditors of the other seldom received what they expected, or expected what they received ; yet so full was his reading, that they always went away satisfied. The reason of it was this," he continues ; " Abbot desired rather imdtum legere than multa ; Hol- land, rather multa than multum. The meditation of the one wrought upon his reading ; the reading of the other wrought upon his meditation, and as it surcharged his memory, so it overruled his invention also." (Abel Red. p. 539.) Though less of a rigid Calvinist than either of his pre- decessors, he considered himself obliged, from respect to his brother, to enter into his prejudices against Laud and his party ; for in the year 1612, he suspended Dr. Howson, canon of Christ Chvuxh, and one who had been vice-chancellor in the imiversity of Oxford, for some remarks which he had made in disparagement of the notes in the Geneva Bible. (Heylyn's Laud, p. 67.) And upon occasion of a sermon preached by Laud on Shrove Sunday, 1614, in which he had used some words to this effect, that the Pres- byterians were as bad as the papists, Abbot, who Avas then vice-chancellor, preaching at St. Mary's shortly after, reflected so pointedly upon this sermon, as must inevitably have caused a dissen- sion in the imiversity, had not Laud very wisely, at the suggestion of liis friend Dr. Richard Neyle, the bishop of Lincoln, forborne all notice of it. Abbot did not remain long in his pro- fessorship ; for in the year 1615 he was promoted to the see of Salisbury. The king was inclined to bestow this prefer- ment on the celebrated Dr. Field, dean of Gloucester, author of 'The Church;' but the influence of some great persons, supported no doubt by the archbishop, prevailed upon the king to confer it upon Dr. Abbot. A fragment of the address which he pronoimced on leaving the university was preserved by Dr. Featley, and printed in Fuller's Abel Red. p. 547. The activity he had shown in his pastoral cure, and in his charge of a college, he now manifested in the care of his diocese. He was the same man in his parish church, his professor's chair, his episcopal seat. " As a violet," says one who knew him well, " whether it be set on a bank higher or lower, retains still the same odour, so did he, whether higher or ABB ABB lower in the churcli ; he did stUl keep close to the earth, and retain his sweet, meek, and humble disposition." Yet he knew how to be firm, and severe too, when the occasion demanded it. For upon repairing to his diocese, having found his beautiiid cathedral church much fallen into decay, from the negli- gence of his predecessors, and the rapa- city of the deans and prebends, who expended the money which should have been employed in rebuilding the walls of our Jerusalem, rather in bmlding their own houses, and enriching themselves, — ■ partly by persuasions (oil and balm) partly by threats (pouring in vinegar) where persuasion would not prevail, he cured this wound, and obtained from them 500/., which he laid out in repara- tion of the church. Nor was he more careful for the dead walls than for the living members of the church; visiting his whole diocese in his own person ; providing spiritual and material bread for his people. Let a bishop be given to hospitality (says St. Paul) ; and oiu: apostle obeyed the injunction ; feasting not those only who could feast him again — the mayor and coi-poration, and nobility of the town — but those also who never sat down to meat except at his table : fol- lowing in this the great Master of apo- stles, who giveth his rain and his sun to the poor and rich alike. Besides his extraordinary acts of hospitality, he feasted all the poor at Christmas ; and as the city of Salisbmy was then divided into three parishes, he had a hundred couple at the least every day : so that be- sides the poorest of all, who were his guests on Christmas-day, all the rest of the needy in the city filled up the other three open holidays. He died March 2, 1617, from a severe attack of the stone, which he bore with great fortitude, having held his see only two years and three months. According to Dr. Heylyn, his death was hastened by the grief which he felt at his brother's resentment, who was extremely indignant at his having married a second wife, about two years before. (Life of Laud.) His daughter named Martha was married to Sir Na- thaniel Brent, warden of Merton College, Oxford. Besides the works already mentioned, he wrote also — 1. 'The True Ancient Roman Catholic, against Dr. Bishop;' Lond.1611. 4to. 2. 'Aiitilogia contra apo- logiam A. Eudcemon-Johannem;' Lond. 1613, quarto; containing much curious information on the Gunpowder Plot. 27 3. The lectures which he delivered during his professorship were published together after his death, with this title, — ' Exerci- tationes de Gratia et Perseverantia Sanc- torum.' Lond. 1618. Frank. 1619. They were directed against two books which created some noise ; one written by Pet. Bertius, another by Richard Thomson, ' De Intercisione Gratiae.' They were dis- liked by the celebrated Dr. Field, (Wood's Ath. i. 412); by Bishop Overall, whose opinion may be seen in the Letters of the Remonstrants, p. 488. See also Heylyn's Life of Laud, p. 127. 4. ' De Suprema Potestate Regia contra Bellarminum et Suarez,' dedicated by his son Thomas to his uncle the Archbishop. Lond. 1619. 4to. 5. A very complete Commentary on the Romans in MS. now in the Bodleian Library ; and some other impublished treatises mentioned by Dr. Featley. ABBOT, (Charles.) See Tenterden. ABBOT, (Robe;-t,) another of the same name, born about 1585, educated at Cambridge, where he took his degree of M.A., and was incorporated into the university of Oxford, Jidy 14, 1607. He was vicar of Cranbrook, in Kent ; during which time he published a volume of sermons, entitled, ' A Hand of Fellow- ship,' &c. London, 1623, 4to. The first two, dedicated to Sir Thomas Robards, kt. and bart., in which he states that he had received all his maintenance from Dr. George Abbot, archbishop of Canter- bury ; the next to Sir Henry Baker, kt. and bart. ; the foin-th to Sir Thomas Hendley, kt. ; the fifth to Walter Roberts, esq. ; the last to Peter Courthorpe, esq. About 1646 he was minister of South- wick, in Hampshire ; and finally, of St. Austin's, in Watling-street, London. He was the author of several sermons and tracts : — 1. Four Sermons; London, 1639, 8vo. dedicated to Walter Curl, bishop of Winchester, to whom he had been servant. 2. ' Milk for Babes, or a Mother's Catechism ;' London, 1646, pp. 222, dedicated to Lady Honoria Nor- ton, Lady Baker, and Lady Dering. Some other pieces mentioned by Wood, Fasti, i. 177. ABBOT, (Sir Maurice, or Morris,) brother of the archbishop, was an eminent merchant in the city of London. He de- voted himself to the direction of the affairs of the East India Company, and to the promotion of foreign commerce. In this capacity he was employed in the Treaty concluded at London July 7, 1619, which defined the possessions of the English and of the Dutch East India Companies. ABB ABB In 1G20 he was sent into Holland, with Sir Dudley Diggs, to recover the goods of some English merchants. In 1623 he was a farmer of the Customs ; and in 1624, one of the council for settling and establishing the colony of Virginia. On the accession of Charles I. he was the first person on whom the king conferred the honoiu- of knighthood; and in 1625, served as a burgess in parliament. In 1627 he was sheriff of London ; in 1635, he erected the monument in the town of Guilford, to the memory of his brother, the archbishop. In 1638 he was lord mayor, and died Jan. 10, 1640. ABBOT, (George,) son of the above, elected probationary fellow of Merton college in 1622, and Bachelor of Civil Law in 1630. — Another of the same name was the author of the ' Whole Book of Job Paraphrased;' Lond. 1640, 4to. which he dedicated to his father-in- law, William Pnrefey, esq. of Caldecott, in Warwickshire. He was likewise the author of a work entitled, ' Vindicise Sab- bati;' London, 1641; intended chiefly as an answer to Dr. Dow, and containing a general view of the Sabbatarian Con- troversy. 3. ' Brief Notes iipon the whole Book of Psalms.' 4to. 1651. ABBOT, (John,) a Jesuit, (?) author of a poem, entitled, ' Jesus Prefigured, in five books. Permissu Superiorum.' 4to. 1623. Dedicated to Prince Charles ; prefixed is also a letter in Spanish by the same person, ' A la Serenisima Seilora Doiia Maria de Austria, Infante de Es- pana, Pi-incesa de Gales ;' dated from the Convent of St. John the Baptist, at Ant- werp, Nov. 12, 1623. ABBOT. Three persons of this name are enumerated in the American Bio- graphical Dictionary. 1. Hull Abbot, (1694—1774,) author of some Sermons. 2. Samuel Abbot, (1732—1812,) one of the founders of the Andover Theological Seminary. 3. Abiel Abbot, D.D., (1770—1827,) author of some Sermons ; and some Let- ters from Cuba, 1829 (Posthumous). Dr. Allen (author of the Biography, and a Congregationalist himself) does not know lO what sect he belonged, but his charge was in Massachusetts. ABBOT, (Lemuel, 1763—1803,) an English portrait painter of some merit. (Bryan's Diet.) ABBOT, (Charles, Lord Colchester, 1 757— 1 829.) This distinguished public functionary was the son of the Rev. John Abbot, D.D., rector of All Saints, Col- 28 Chester, and having passed through" Westminster school and Oxford with credit to his scholai-ship,* he entered on the study of the law, and was called to the bar about the year 1782. In the year 1795, he became M.P. for Halston, and in the following year, on occasion of the Seditious Meetings' Bill, he shewed the soimdness of his principles and his moral courage by a powei-ful anti-revo- lutionary speech. His career from this time was destined to be one of unwearied activity to himself, and of great useful- ness to his country. He gave his best services as a member of the House of Commons, to the conception and pro- motion of the most useful of all objects, practical, not theoretical, reform — to those silent improvements in the method of conducting public business, the bene- fits of which have been universally ac- knowledged. The chief points to which his attention was directed, were — 1. The mode of treating expiring laws ; and by the improvements he introduced, the anomalies which so frequently occuiTed under the former methods were avoided. 2. The mode of bringing new laws into general operation, by sending a copy of them to all the petty sessions. 3. The transactions of Mr. Pitt's finance com- mittee, of which he was the chairman. 4, The state of tlie public records. In Feb. 1800, he moved for a committee to inquire into their condition, &c., and at the end of the session their report was presented. This was the origin, no doubt, of the royal commission to effect the same objects, which has since been in operation. 5. To a consideration of the population of Great Britain. In 1801, Mr. Abbot moved for a census of the population of Great Britain, which has since been taken at intervals of ten years with manifest advantage, at least to the science of statistics. And here let that most valuable public ser- vant, Mr. Hickman, clerk of the House of Commons, receive his due share of praise for the indefatigable industry, and the extraordinary accuracy and intelli- gence, with which he has executed the important task of arranging and pre- paring these records. These are proofs of a turn of mind, which looked for the means of bringing into the practice of the House, and into the an-angement of the business of the nation, every practicable improvement; * He obtained the prize at Oxford for Latiu Verse in 1777. ABB ABB and these improvements were much for one man to effect. In 1801, on the formation of Lord Sidmouth's ministry, Mr. Abbot was ap- pointed Secretary for Ireland, but did not hold this office long, being elected Speaker of the House of Commons, Feb. 10, 1802. From his conduct in that ar- duous office. Lord Colchester has de- served the gratitude of his country by the improvements which he introduced into the mode of conducting the business of the House, by the uniform order and dignity which he was enabled to main- tain, and by the example and the prece- dents which he has left to his successors. Two of the most useful improvements introduced by him were relative to pri- vate bills, and to the mode of an*anging and delivering the papers called the Votes of the House, &c. In 1805, he gave a casting vote against Lord Melville, when his lordship's con- duct was brought before the House in consequence of the inquiries of the finance committee. In 1813, Mr. Abbot defeated the Roman Catholic bill in committee. For fifteen years he held the office of speaker, and on his retirement from it, on account of ill health, lie was created Baron Colchester, and a pension of 4,000/. a-year was voted to himself, and 3,000/. a-year to the next possessor of the title. There is perhaps no situation more arduous than that of speaker of the House of Commons, none more trying to the health ; and Lord Colchester pro- bably suffered from his long occupation of that office. He went abroad for his health ; and having staid there three years, he returned to England, and divided his time between London and Kidbrook in Sussex. Dm-ing the time he held his seat in the House of Lords, he introduced one or two usefiU changes also in the mode of conducting their business, and was the means of esta- blishing a library attached to that branch of the legislature. In 1827, he visited the Highlands, where he was enthusiastically received in consequence of his exertions for the advantage of that part of Great Britain on all occasions when the execution of public works there was brought before the House. Lord Colchester's health had long been declining, and he died in 1829. His character may be judged of from the preceding details ; but it is right to add one more trait, namely, the ex- 29 treme appropriateness of his addresses on public occasions, and the dignity with which he delivered them. Among tlie many addresses of this kind which he was called upon to make, the most re- markable is that of the 1st of July, 1814, in which he replied to the duke of Wel- lington's acknowledgment of the thanks of the House. It is a perfect model for all similar occasions, — if a similar occasion can ever occiu- ! Lord Colchester man-ied, in 1796, the daughter of Sir P. Gibbes, bart., and was succeeded by his son, Capt. Abbot, R.N. Some speeches of Lord Colchester have been published, and also a work on the Practice of the Chester Circuit. He is also said to have been the author of an anonymous pamphlet on the Use and Abuse of Satu-e. Oxf. 1786. The Bio- graphie Universelle relates an anecdote of him, which, if authentic, is worth re- peating. It is, that he himself told a friend what his feelings were when the votes were equal in Lord Melville's case. In the midst of the confusion, and in the midst of most turbulent and contending feel- ings in his owm breast, which nearly ovei-powered him, he took a moment's breathing time, lifted up his eyes to heaven, and prayed God most sincerely to strengthen him. He took courage, spoke calmly, and was listened to and received most favourably ! (Annual Obitiiary, 1830 — in an article founded on the Gentleman's Mag. and the Par- liamentary Register.) ABBRACCIAVACCA MEO, a poet of Pistoia, who flourished in the thir- teenth century. (See Tiraboschi.) ABBT, (Thomas, 1738—1766,) a na- tive of Ulm ; a mathematician, lawyer, and philosopher ; who, considering that he died at the early age of twenty-eight, wrote much, and who would have taken a very high rank among German authors had he reached a more mature age. On leaving the gymnasium of Ulm he went to the university of Halle, in order to pm'sue the study of theology ; but mathe- matics, modem languages, and belles let- tres, proved more congenial to his taste. In 1760 he was appointed extraordinary professor of philosophy at Frankfort-on- the-Oder, and in 1761 ordinary professor of mathematics at the university of Rin- teln. Before entering on the duties of this office he remained some time at Berlin, and became the fi'iend of Men- delsohn, Nicolai, and other distinguished literary characters, and contributed mucli to their Letters on Modem Literature ABD ABD At Rinteln he ■\\Tote his essay Ueher den Tod fiir das Vaterland (on Dying for our Country), and that Vom Ver- dienste (or, On Merit), which are con- sidered his best productions. Disliking an university life, he refused professor- sliips at Halle and Marburg, and deter- mined to enter into the world ; and for this purpose having begun the study of the law, he travelled through Germany, Switzerland, and part of France. In 1765, William, count of Schaumbm-g- Lippe, called him to his court at Biicke- burg, and gave him ajudicial appointment, (Regierungs-und-Consistorial-Rath.) He died suddenly in 1766, of a kind of cholera ; and his tomb was adorned with an epitaph written by the count himself. After his death Nicolai published his works in 6 vols, small 8vo. Thomas Abbt's, 8ic. Vermischte Werke, (Thomas Abbt's Miscellaneous Works.) It is not necessary to enumerate the contents of these volumes : that they were indeed mis- cellaneous may be seen from some of their titles ; On the Friendships of Women ; On the Influence of the Beautiftd on the Severer Sciences ; On the Worship of Astarte ; On Josephus, &c. In 1767 a posthumous work appeared, with a preface by J. P. Miller ; its sub- ject was the early history of mankind; — and also a translation of Sallust's Con- spiracy of Catiline. The translation of the Jugurthine War, attributed to him by Wagner, has not a single line of his writing. His admii'ers allow that his notions were crude, and his style occa- sionally affected ; but they contend that with his clear intellect, his acute judg- ment, and his powers of language, had he lived longer he must have been most eminent. Indeed, as it is. Dr. Wolff calls him " unquestionably the best wi-iter of his day, with the exception of Lessing." He is thought to have done much for the formation of a pure German style ; and it is probably in this respect that he is more to be esteemed than for any aug- mentation to the stock of human know- ledge from the matter of his works. (Wolff's Cyclopadie der Deutschen Na- tional- Literatur. Leipzig, 1S35. Herder and Nicolai's Memorials of Abbt.) ABCAR, a Mohammedan doctor of the sixteenth century. ABDALLA, the father of Mahomet, about whom some legends are told. Be- ing sent by his father to purchase corn, lie died at Medina, which was then called Yatreb, leaving Mahomet, who was only two months old, nothing but five camels 30 and an Ethiopian slave. Yet his follow* ers assert that a queen of Syi-ia fell in love with Abdalla, and that the future pi-ophet was the result of this connexion. ABDALLA, the son of Ali, and uncle to the first two khalifs of the dynasty of Abbas, distmguished himself in the war with the last of the Omeyas, Meruan, (see the name,) whom he was instrumen- tal in dethroning ; but he disgraced his victoi-y by perfidy and cruelty. On the death of Abid Abbas el SafFan, the first khalif of the Abbassides, he proclaimed himself Commander of the Faithfid ; but being vanquished by the general of his nephew Mausur, he was pursued and idtimately destroyed, with the house in which he had taken refuge, a.h. 138, (A.D. 755.) ABDALLA BEN ALAFTAS, Mo- hammedan governor of Badajoz, and head of all the confederated tribes of Moors and Arabs in Portugal, in the eleventh centmy. ABDALLA BEN BALKIN, Arabian king of Granada, and one of the first victims to the perfidy of Yussef ben Tax- fin, emperor of the Almoravides. The reader should here observe, that on the decline of the Arabian monarchy in Spain, at the close of the tenth century, the walis or governors of the great cities assumed the regal title, and proclaimed their independence of Cordova. ABDALLA BEN MOHAMMED, (d. 901,) king of Mohammedan Spain, succeeded his brother Almondhir in 888. His reign was a troubled one, not from the christian Alfonso, but from his own subject, Calib ben Omar, a bandit chief, who occupied some of his strongest for- tresses, and brought into the field troops numerous enough to contend with kings. Behind the impregnable walls of Toledo, the rebel covild bid defiance to the armies of Abdalla. Two of the monarch's own sons were also in open insun-ection ; but these he defeated, and one of them he probably put to death. That in general he was a hvmiane, no less than an en- lightened man, is expressly affirmed by the Mohammedan writers of Spain. Su- leyinan, formerly cadi of Merida, wrote a bitter lampoon against him and his go- vernment. The author was soon dis- covered, and brought into the royal presence. " I very much fear, my dear Suleyman," said the monarch, " that my favours to thee have been thrown away : certainly I do not merit thy poetical compliments. I might punish thee, but I will not!" Anotlier instance of Ab- A BD A BD dalla's forbearance is still nobler. There was a captain of the Berbers, Suleyman by name, who was also a wazir, and member of the council of state, distin- guished for strict morals and high ho- nour, but blunt, irascible, and too proud to be the willing slave of a despot. Like most of the Berbers, he was noted for a long black beard, which formed a strik- ing contrast with the short bushy ones of their comrades, the Scythian guards : and this venerable symbol of manhood he perhaps prized more than his life. Entering one day into the king's apart- ment, the latter, who was noted for facetiousness, repeated to him some verses in wliich long beards were turned into ridicule, — as indicative of any thing but long heads ; and concluded by say- ing, "Sit down. Long-beard!" The wazir obeyed ; but his blood boiled with indignation, and he could not forbear replying — " We, (the Berbers,) a nume- rous people, surely deserved to be called fools for coming so far to crawl in the palaces of kings. What humiliations might we not have avoided ! It is am- bition which blinds us, and we do not see our stupidity until we descend into the grave." He then arose and left the palace, without deigning to notice the king. Abdalla was somewhat surprised at his manner, and still more so when some days elapsed without his appear- ance at court. A wazir was sent to appease the offended African ; but he had great difficulty in obtaining an en- trance ; and even when suffered to pass the threshold, his reception was insult- ing : Sulejanan neither arose, nor invited liim to sit. " Why dost thoxi not rise to receive me V asked the offended mes- senger, " am I not a wazir like th3^self ?" " Such ceremony," replied Sideyman, " was well enough so long as I was a vile slave like thee ; but now I have broken my chains!" Not all the expostulations of the officer could prevail on the inde- pendent African to resmne his employ- ment, or even to revisit the palace ; and Abdalla regretted that, through a harm- less joke, he was deprived of the service of a man whose fidelity and judgment he had long learned to value. (Conde, Ilistoria de la Dominacion de los Arabes. Dunham's Hist, of Spain and Portugal.) ABDALLA ABU MOHAMMED, emperor of the Almohades in Africa and Spain, a dynasty established in the twelfth century, by Mohammed ben Ab- dalla and Abdelmumen. (See the names.) This monarch was always resident in 31 Spain, busily occupied in resisting the' increasing power of the Christians. He perished by the hands of his own sub- jects, in the year of the Hejira 622, (a.d 1225.) ABDALLA BEN ZAGUT, wali of Malaga in the eleventh century, was one of the men who most strongly dis- suaded Mohammed king of Seville from invokingtheaidof the Almoravides, anew dynasty in Africa. (Seethe next article.) But his advice was disregarded, and Mo- hammedan Spain became a province of the Afi-ican empire. ABDALLA BEN YASSLM, founder of the gi'eat empire of the Almoravides, in the eleventh century, — an empire which exercised a resistless influence over north- western Afi'ica and Spain, yet of which little is known in this countrj\ Where D'Herbelot, and Casiri, and Gibbon, how- ever, and consequently our modern bio- graphies, are silent or unsatisfactory, Conde, and writers since Conde, recent as he is, enable us to supply a curious, and we may add important, addition to our popular knowledge. Yahia ben Ibrahim, the native of a tribe originally derived from Arabia, and settled in the country beyond Mount Atlas from a period immemorial, was no less pious, in the Mohammedan sense of the word, than any of his countrymen. He made the gi-eat pilgrimage of Mecca, and beheved, as he was bound to do, that it had obtained him the absolution of his sins. On his retm-n tlu-ough Cairwan, he met with an alfaqui, originally of Fez, and named Abu Amram. With this theologian, whose fame was widely spread, he became intimate. Conversing one day on the state of the Mohammedan religion beyond the momitain chain, he ob- served that if his countrymen were igno- rant, they were desirous to learn, and that if they were poor, they would readily maintain a new teacher. In fact, people so secluded from the vices of the world, woidd be likely to prove better disciples than the more polished inhabitants of cities ; and he expressed a wish that some disciple of Abu Amram woidd benefit them by his instructions. But none of those disciples had any inclination to encounter a long jom-ney and a doubt- ful reception by a barbarous people, for the mere interests of knowledge ; nor was it without considerable difficulty that the pupil of another teacher was induced to undertake the mission. This was Abdalla ben Yassim, a man of great entei-prise, gi-eat genius, and still greater ABD ABD knavery. By the tribe to wliicli Yaliia belonged, — that of Gudala, — he was re- ceived not merely with welcome, but with enthusiasm. Such was the imsettled state of the Mohammedan world, occa- sioned by the frequent changes of the khaliphat, by the perpetual rivalship of sects, and by the wars to which both gave rise, that he formed a design which in other circumstances might have been simply ridiculous — that of founding in these vast and almost inaccessible regions, a new sovereignty for the temporal no less than the spiritual government of the people. The empire which he had ob- tained over the tribe of Gudala rendered them his instruments for any purpose ; and he had little difficulty in persuading them that the dissemination of the holy truths which he taught them, was their first, most urgent, and most important duty. The Prophet had set the example of proselyting by the sword ; it was, there- fore, a holy one : the tribe was valiant ; the neighbouring one of Lamtuna was there placed by heaven to be the first conquered ; and a brave number of wai-- riors arose to fight the battles of the Lord. The people of Lamtuna were un- able or unwilhng to resist ; in orthodoxy, they soon rivalled their neighbours of Gudala, and were no less eager to extend the blessing which they enjoyed. Thus the strong arms of two tribes were now at his disposal. A third was, with equal facility, persuaded or forced to receive the new faith, — or rather the new modi- fication of faith ; for the koran, however diiferently it might be intei-preted, was still the great authority in doch-ine, the great rule in morals. As years rolled on, so did his success, until all the people in the vicinity of the ancient deserts of Getulia had sworn obedience to this new prophet. With resources such as he now commanded, we are prepared for the in- formation that not only the district of Darah, but the whole country between the Great Desert and the Atlas moun- tains, — a region large enough for a king- dom, — received his yoke. Conqueror as he was, and unbounded as was the power he exercised, he did not assume the title of sovereign : that he left to the emir of Lamtuna ; and on the death of that chief in battle (a.h. 450, a.d. 1058), he raised Abu Bekir ben Omar to the vacant dig- nity. Before this event he had given a name to his disciples — that of Murahittns, or Almoravides, men consecrated to the worship of God. It is under the latter denomination, which, however, is the 32 same as the former, that they are known in Spanish history. On the death of Abdalla (also in battle), AbuBekir inherited the whole of his power. This prince had talents for the post. His successes, his reputation, his proselytes increased; until, finding that he was pow- erful enough to attempt the subjugation of the more desirable region north and west of Momit Atlas, he crossed that chain, and established himself in its western declivity at the city of Agmat. But Agmat was not large enough to con- tain his immediate followers, still less to become the capital of a great empire ; and he looked for a site worthy of his views. The valley of Eylana pleased him ; and from it the city of Morocco began to arise. To finish this great un- dertaking — an undertaking which de- manded years of patient industry, was not reserved for him. In the midst of his labour a deadly feud between the two leading ti-ibes of Gudala and Lamtuna induced him to recross the Atlas chain. The progress of the building, the com- mand of his troops, and a vice-regal au- thority, he left to his cousin Yussef ben Taxfin. Scarcely had Abu Bekir departed, when the ambitious Yussef, who had always been popular, began to undermine the power of his absent kinsman. Strong, active, un- wearied; of a commanding presence, a pleasing countenance ; endowed with great generosity, love of justice, and many other noble qualities ; imsurpassed in valour, vmequalled in enterprise, this chief had little difficulty in prevailing on the leaders of the people to espouse his cause. His success in more than one military expe- dition, especially against the Berbers, rendered him the idol of the multitude. Yet he did not throw oflT the outward semblance of allegiance to Abu Bekir; on the contrary, he professed to act merely as the wasir or lieutenant of the lawful sovereign. Even when he had finished the building, and transported to it the inhabitants of Agmat, as well as the residents of many other towns ; when he had married — without the consent of Abu Bekir — Zainab, the sister of his master, he still used moderation. Nay, when he had raised his followers to 100,000 men, and had subdued the whole of Fez, (the ancient Tingitana,) and was resistless in the field, he was too politic to leave to posterity the example of suc- cessfiU rebellion ; he was still the wasir of Abu Bekir, the second governor of the Murabitins. AB D AB D Yussef had just completed tlie con- quest of Fez, (a.h.466, a.d. 1072,) when Abu Bekir returned from the desert, and encamped m the vicinity of Agmat. Of his long absence, no explanation is given. When informed of the boundless power ■which his kinsman had assumed, he saw, when too late, the true character of the man whom he had trusted. AU men — the high and low, the ministers of religion and laymen, nay, his own adherents — were loud in their admiration of the conqueror. The horsemen whom he sent to Yussef 's camp, were equally influenced by the general praise. What could he do ? He had not one-fourth of his kinsman's mili- taiy force ; he had few resources, a small reputation. He feared that his sceptre was for ever departed; but he would adopt no resolution until he had seen his formidable wasir. Between Morocco and Agmat the two chiefs met, and seated themselves on the same carpet. Great was the con- trast between them ; the one magnificent, the other mean ; the servant proud, the master humble. The appearance of Yu- sef s formidable guard, the readiness with which he was served, the mortifying dis- tinction made between him and Abu Bekir, convinced the latter that he had nothing to hope, but, on the contrary, much to fear. He made his decision, professed his long dissatisfaction with em- pire, which he would cheerfidly resign into hands so worthy to receive it; and his resolution to pass the remainder of his life in private tranquillity. Yussef thanked him for his volimtary abdication ; di-ew round his sheiks to witness the formal act ; and in tliis way the kinsmen parted. The following day Abu Bekir received a splendid gift from Yussef, which, as it is characteristic of the age, we may specify. Twenty-five thousand crowns of gold ; seventy horses of the noblest breed, and magnificently accoutred ; one hundi-ed and fifty mules of gi-eat value ; one hun- dred splendid turbans ; as many costly habits ; four hundi-ed common turbans ; two hundred white mantles ; one thousand pieces of rich stuffs ; two hundred pieces of fine linen ; one hundred and fifty black slaves ; twenty beautiful damsels ; with a large store of perfumes, corn, cattle, and slaves, were certainly worthy of royalty, and might almost compensate for its loss. Yet such presents were frequently re- peated during the lifetime of Abu Bekir. Fi-om this period we hear no more of Abu Bekir, who is lost to history. The exploits of Yussef were numerous and great ; but for these we must refer to the VOL. r. 33 proper article. (See Yussef ben Taxfin.) In the present one we have mentioned him only as far as he is connected with the origin of the great Murabitin djTiasty. We may, however, observe, that on the abdication of Abu Bekir, he exchanged the humble title of emir for that of Al- muslemin, or prince of the believers ; and that of Nasareddin, or defender of the faith. Powerful as tliis dynasty was, its exist- ence was a very short one. It consisted only of the following princes : — 1. Yussef ben Taxfin, from 1094 till 1107 2. AU ben Yussef .... 1107 1143 3. Taxfin ben Ali .... 1143 1145 4. Ibrahim Abu Ishac . . 1145 1148 It was soon to be subverted by the dynasty of the Almohades (see Abdelmumen), one more unprincipled and atrocious than itself. (D'Herbelot, Bibliotheque. Ca- siri. Bib. Arab. Hisp. Escurial. tom. ii. Conde, Historia de la Dominacion de los Arabes. Dimham, History of Spain and Portugal.) ABDALLA EL ZAGAL, the last of the Moorish kings of Granada, ascended the throne a.h. 889, or a.d. 1484. He had to contend witli both a domestic and a foreign enemy, — with his nephew, Abu Abdalla, who aspired to the throne, and with the formidable Fernando, king of Christian Spain. It was owing to the dissension of these two kings, more than to any other cause, that Fernando made such progress in the conquest of Gra- nada, the last of the Mohammedan king- doms. For a time, indeed, their arms were combined, but they were soon dis- united ; and while El Zagal threw him- self into Guadix, Abu Abdalla sustained the siege of Granada. Perceiving that his strongest fortresses were in the power of the Christians, and that Guadix could not long hold out, the former hastened to the camp of Fernando, and in return for some extensive domains, resigned his authority, and his best possessions, into the hands of that king. Granada, the capital, held out a short time only, and then capitulated. (See Abu Abdalla.) This convention, which took place in about seven years after his accession, led to the voluntary exile of El Zagal. Unwilling to live as a subject where he had reigned as a king, he passed into Africa, and was lost to history. — The Moorish romances of this period, which are illustrative alike of the national cha- racter and of the war, have been often admired and often versified, and have given to the subject an interest which it A B D AB D would otherwise have wanted. (Dun- ham's Spain.) ABDALLA BEN ZOBAIR, khalif of Mecca ; was raised to that dignity in consequence of the excesses committed by Yezid, khalif of Syria, against the offspring of Ali. This was in the year of Christ 660, only 62 years after the Hejira, or the flight of Mahomet from Mecca to Medina. Ali (see the name) the cousin and son-in-law of Mahomet, was held in much veneration by the people of Mecca ; and this persecution of his offspring was deeply offensive to them. Hence the proclamation of Abdalla, who had been one of the greatest supports of that house, of which he was a member. On hearing this intelligence, Yezid, after a short ne- gotiation, sent an army to besiege the holy city. For a time the siege was pushed with vigour ; but Yezid dying, the army returned to Damascus, and Abdalla was left in tranquil possession of the khalifat during nine years. He was then opposed by the khalif Abdelmelek, by whom he was vanquished and slain. A brave and pious man, he had yet one faialt, — that of avarice. Hence the saying, that before him, liberality had always been asso- ciated with bravery. (D'Herbelot.) ABDALLA IBN SAAD, the scribe of Mahomet, who committed to writing most part of the Koran, under the dic- tation of that prophet. After a long disgrace, owing, we are told, to his con-uption of the holy volume, he ac- companied Mahomet in his conquests. Under the immediate successors of the impostor he was honourably employed. He invaded Abyssinia, was viceroy of Egypt, overran Lybia, and was very ac- tively employed imto liis death, about the middle of the seventh century. ABDALLA, fourth and last sheik of the Wahabis, distinguished himself dur- ing the life of his father, Schud, the third prince of the dynasty. At war with the Turks and the Egyptians, imder Maho- met Ali, he had sometimes victory sometimes defeat ; but he was always indefatigable, always courageous. In 1813 he succeeded his father, and the following year was called to measure arms with the celebrated viceroy of Egypt. He failed, and was compelled to negotiate ; but this was only to gain time. In 1816 hostilities recommenced with new vigoiu: ; and the following year the chief of the Wahabis was signally defeated by Ibrahim Pacha. At length he was besieged in the best of liis fortresses, obliged to capitulate, 34 sent first into Egypt, and next to Con- stantinople, where, in 1818, he was be- headed by order of the sultan. ABDALLA-EBN - CAIS - EL-FEZA- RY was the first Mussulman who assailed Sicily, in a.d. 667. He was the general of the khalif Moawia, and his descent was successful as far as phmder was con- cerned. ABDALLATIF, (1161—1231,) the celebrated historian of Bagdat. As his father was in easy circumstances, he was enabled to acquire all the knowledge of the age. Until his twentieth year he studied medicine ; but this profession being little to his taste, he abandoned it, and gave up his whole time to history. To collect materials, he repaired to Mus- sul, Damascus, and Jerusalem ; and from thence in the camp of Saladin, whose vizir Bahadin encouraged him in all his projects. Furnished with letters of re- commendation by that chief, he next tra- velled into Egypt, where he abode some time. On his retm-n to Saladin 's camp he was rewarded by a pension on the treasvu*y of Damascus, and at Damascus he fixed his residence for some years. But the same ardent curiosity often led him to other places, — to none without improvement. Piety at length took him to Mecca, and the recollections of his j'outh to Bagdat ; but death surprised him just when he had reached the latter city. His works were exceedingly nu- merous ; but on two of them liis repu- tation must rest. The first, a Descrip- tion of Egypt, has not found its way to Europe ; and as copies in the east are almost unknown, perhaps it never may. The second, which is also on Egypt, and comprehends the personal experience of the author, his diligent observations, the description of every thing he deemed worthy of notice, has been published, with a Latin translation, at Oxford (1800). A German one had previously issued from the press of Halle (1790) ; and a French one, the best of all, has since appeared by Silvestre de Sacy, Paris, 1810. He is said to be a most careful, no less than a reflecting writer. Of this name were two other orientals. One, the son of Ulec Beg, king of Trans- oxiana, rebelled against his father, whom he defeated and slew. In six months aflerwards (1452) he was himself slain by an arrow from his own followers. Whether the missile was accidental, or intended to punish liis panicide, is doubtful. Another Abdallatif, son of Abdalla, A B D AB D prince of the Usbek Tartars, deserves mentioning as the last of the race of Ghengis Khan. He died a. h. 948, A. D. 1541. (D'Herbelot. Preface of De Sacy.) ABDALRAHMAN IBN HUSSEIN, a native of Cairo, took the part of the French soon after their Invasion of Egypt. On their expulsion by the English, he wrote against them with equal facility. In 1807 he presented his little work to Mustapha IV., at Constantinople ; and by that sultan's order it was translated from Arabic into Turkish. A more im- portant work is his Modern History of Egypt (1688—1806), in 3 vols. This work ought to be translated. Its publi- cation was contemplated by Mehemet Ali; but probably it will never see the light unless it be issued from some European press. ABDALRAHMAN, an African prince, a native of Timbuctoo, whose fate was somewhat singidar. While in a city which depended on Timbuctoo, in the command of the troops, he was visited by Mr. Cox, an American surgeon, to whom he showed, during six months, all the hospitality that could be expected. Some years afterwards,being unsuccessful in war, he was made a slave, sold to the traders, embarked, and sent among the Natchez. Here, as chance or provi- dence dii'ected, he was again accidentally met by the sm-geon Cox, who procured his liberation, and enabled him to return. He died, however, before he coidd revisit his country (1829) ; and his death has been much lamented by men of science, from the belief that had his life been spared, he would have been instnmiental in opening a permanent communication between Timbuctoo and the civilized world. ^ ABDAL-WAHAB, the true founder of the Wahabis, a sect of Mohammedan heretics, who began their opposition to the sidtan of Constantinople about the middle of the last century. The honour, however, is usually attributed to his son Mohammed. (See the name.) As there can be no doubt that Mohammed had more power than his father, and is the only one of the two known to Euro- peans ; as his exploits were far more sig- nal than those of Abdal-wahab, whose life was comparatively obscure, we refer to that article for an examination of the reli- gious and political tenets of this sect. ABDAS, a Persian bishop of the fifth century ; was consecrated to that region on the consent of Isdegerd, its monarch, 35 to suffer the preaching of the gospel. So long as Isdegerd lived, the missionaries were not molested ; nor would they havje been so in the reign of Varanes V., the next king, but for the indiscreet zeal of Abdas, who assailed one of the temples of fire. The magians complained to the sovereign, who merely reprimanded the author of the outi'age, — a degree of clemency unusual in the east, — and only demanded that the temple should be rebuilt at the expense of its destroy- ers. Abdas reflised to do so ; and the people's rage was immediately directed against all the Christian churches, which were soon levelled with the groimd. Nor was this all ; a persecution followed, in which many Christians perished. Some were spared, in the hope of their retiu-n to the ancient religion ; others, among whom were two of the royal family, were condemned to the vilest employments. The worst of all was the war which the Greek empire, at the solicitation of the Christians,made on the monarch of Persia, and which raged near thirty j^ears. Ab- das was the first victim to the fury of the men he had insulted and provoked ; yet he is called a martjT, and is worshipped as a saint.* (BoUandus, Acta SS. — Gibbon.) ABDEL-ASIS, son of Muza, the con- queror of Spain, who assisted his father in that great undertaking. (See Muza.) The gi-eat battle of Xeres (711) did not decide the fate of the peninsula. Many fortresses still held out ; and it re- quired all the force, all the perseverance of father and son, to reduce them. Ab- del-asis had the glory of compelling Theodomir, the successor of Rodrigo, to suiTender the strong fortress of Ori- huela. On this occasion he acted with a generosity little known to Mohammedans; he behaved to the royal captive with the most respectful attention. In the sub- sequent campaigns — and many years elapsed after the battle of Xeres before Spain was a Mohammedan pro^dnce — the young emir exhibited great valour and great enterprise. But the avarice of his father, and that father's mean jealousy of Tarik, (see the name,) were injurious to him. By the khalif Walid, the successor of Abdel-melic, Tarik and Musa were summoned to Damascus ; and by the latter, Abdel-asis was left with the govern- ment of Spain. This emir was, in many respects, deserv-ing of the trust : he sub- dued Lusitania in person ; Navarre and the north of AiTagon by his generals. • See Alban Butler's Lives of the Saints, where this saiBt is lepiesented more catholico, D2 AB D AB D That he had ambitious views, may be in- ferred alike from his policy, and from his marriage with Egilona, the widow of Rodrigo. If, however, he had no such views, she would have been sure to in- spire him with them. They were soon suspected ; and his private vices added to the general dissatisfaction. The davighters of the noblest chiefs he forced to become his concubines. His conduct was nar- rowly watched by Suleyman,the successor of Walid, who punished the father, and decreed the ruin of the son. Secret orders were despatched for his death, and that of his brother ; and while at morning prayers in the great mosque of Seville, he fell beneath the daggers of his assassins. His trunk was buried in the court-yard of his palace ; his head was sent to Damascus, and shown by the khalif to Muza. The afflicted father turned away at the sight, exclaiming, " Cursed be he who has slain a better man than himself!" He left Damascus, and retired into Arabia, where grief soon brought him to the grave. Abdel-asis fell in the year of Christ 716. Such was the reward which the conquerors of Spain received from their sovereign ! (Conde, Historia de la Dominacion, tom. i. Isi- doi-us Pacensis, Chronicon. Casm, Bib- liotheca Arab. Hisp. tom. ii. ABDEL-ASIS, chief of the Wahabis, a Mahommedan sect at variance with both the Persians and Turks, and whom both heartily curse as heretics. (See Abdal- Wahab.) Joined by many tribes of the desert, he was formidable enough to defy the tiiie believers. The holy city of Imam Hussein fell into his power ; the still holier one of Mecca soon obeyed him. In the midst of his triumphs he fell the victim of domestic treason, being stabbed at prayers by a Persian who had tiu'ned Wahabite with the resolution to murder him. This event happened in 1803 ; but his domi- nion, which had been founded by his father, Ebn Shud, did not fall with him ; he was succeeded by his son Shud, (See Abdalla.) ABDEL - CADER - BEN - MOHAM- MED, a native of Medina, and a writer on the cultivation of coffee in the 16th century. ABDEL -CAHER ABU BEKIR, a philologist and grammarian of the 11th century. ABDEL-MELEK, the fifth khalif of Damascus, of the house of Omeya, succeeded his father, Merwan I. in the year of the Hejira 65, (a. d. 685.) His reign was a troubled one. Innu- 36 merable were the engagements which he had with the armies of Abdalla ben Zobair, (see the name,) whom the in- habitants of Mecca had raised to the khalifat. He had also to fight with the Greeks, who were long too powerful for him. At length, however, he had in- ternal peace, and his domains were augmented in the East and West. Muza placed his victorious ensigns on the extremity of Africa, and Spain was soon to be added to the other provinces of his widely-extended empire. Of his personal qualities, avarice was the most prominent ; and he is said to have been partially cured of it by an apologue. Being one day low-spirited, he com- manded his jester to enliven him by some story. " There was an owl at Bussora, and another at Mussoul. The owl of Mussoul asked the daughter of the owl of Bussora for his son. 'Yes,' replied the other owl, ' on one condition, ■ — tliat thou givest thy son as a marriage portion one hundred ruined buildings.' 'At present,' replied the sage of Mussoul, ' I cannot fulfil this condition ; but if through the grace of God om* khalif reigns another year, I Avill give my son the number thou requirest.' " From this time, says the Arabian historian, Abdel- melek was less avaricious, and more attentive to the duties of his station. There is a legend respecting this khalif, which ought to be mentioned, as it has found its way into the chronicle of the destruction of Spain by the Mooi's, usu- ally known as the Chronicle of Don Rodrigo ; into the history of the arch- bishop of Toledo ; and into a Moham- medan history of Spain, that of Abul Cassim. The original, which is doubt- less from the east, is as follows : — Abdel-melek, say tlie oriental writers, subdued Spaki ; and he heard of a castle which according to popular tradition had been built by the fairies, and was filled with riches. It was situated in the bosom of the mountains, scarcely accessible to mortals. As avarice was his ruling pas- sion, he caused diligent search to be made for this rich tower, and at length it was discovered. Over the entrance were four verses, wi'itten in a very an- cient character : Difficult will be the attempt to open the gates of this castle. The iron-tooth, rash traveller, which thou seest, belongs not to the lock, but to a fiu-ious dragon. Be assured that no man will be able to break this charm, ABD ABD Unless destiny put the right key Into his hands. The khalif's men desisted from the en- terprise. In the Spanish chronicles before men- tioned, the honour both of the discovering and of the opening is assigned to Rod- rigo, the last Gothic monarch of Spain, He and his predecessors had long heard of an enchanted tower, or cave, which was believed to contain not only im- mense treasure, but ancient pi'ophecies concerning the fate of the kingdom. If it had been shunned by them, it was not so by him ; and in spite of the svipplica- tions of his councillors, Rodrigo opened the mysterious tower. He found nothing within but strange representations of Saracens and Moors, who, as an inscrip- tion bore, would soon conquer Spain. This legend of the di-agon and the treasure — of this enchanted fabric — is of far higher antiquity and of more uni- versal diffusion than is generally sup- posed. It pervades the ancient history of all nations, and is a portion of that traditionary lore which both Celts and Goths derived from some common source. (D'Herbelot, Bibliotheque. Cronica del Rey Don Rodrigo. Rudericus Toletanus, de Rebus Hispanicis.) ABDEL-MELEK I. was the fifth monarcli of the dynasty of Saman, (see the name and that of Assad,) which ruled over Transoxiana, a province that had escaped from the yoke of the khalifs. This prince ascended the throne in the year of Christ 954, and died after a reign of seven years, by a fall from his horse. ABDEL-MELEK II. (d. 999,) the ninth king of the Samanides in Transoxi- ana, was raised to the throne by a faction hostile to the sway of his brother Man- soor, (see the name.) He was but the slave of that faction. To rescue him from dependence, a princely ally armed, and defeated the two chief rebels. In revenge, they prevailed on the weak Ab- del-melek to invoke the aid of Ilek Khan, monarch of Turkestan, whose secret crea- tures they were. The barbarian obeyed the call, crossed the Taxartes, advanced to Bokhara, seated himself on the throne of the Samanides, and sent Abdel-melek to prison in Tm-kestan, where he died. With him ended the dynasty of the Sa- manides ; for though his brother Montasar ■was proclaimed by the adherents of his house, the latter was bvit a fugitive from one province to another, and was at length slain, after a reign of less than a year. ABDEL-MELEK, a native of Ceuta 37 in Africa, and a commentator on the poem of Ibn Abdun. ABDEL-MELEK BEN SALAH, of the family of Mahomet, was entrusted by Aaroun al Raschid with the govern- ment of Egypt, and by his son with that of Syria. ABDEL-MUMEN, (Abu Mohammed,) founder of the great dynasty of' the Almohades, and the associate of Mo- hammed Abu Abdalla in that most im- portant revolution. As this extraordinary man has been inaccurately or imperfectly represented in all the biographical col- lections we have seen, we shall dwell upon him at somewhat greater length than we should otherwise be disposed to do. We must, however, premise, that as the dynasty of the Almoravides preceded that of the Almohades in the same re- gions, the reader will have a much better conception of the latter revolution, if, before he proceeds farther in this arti- cle, he will turn to Abdalla ben Yassim, Abu Bekir, and Yussef ben Taxfin, the founders of the preceding dynasty. Under Ali, the successor of Yussef ben Taxfin in the empire of the Almoravides, there was a sti'ong dislike to that dynasty in Spain, and no affection towards it in Africa. In both countries it was totter- ing to its fall. In the one the victories of the Cliristians, in the other the ap- pearance of a rival sect, was the cause. The origin of this sect must be chiefly attributed to Mohammed ben Abdalla, whose character and exploits are so closely connected with those of Abdel- mumen, as to render them inseparable. Mohammed was a native of Cordova, of humble birth, but distinguished for great ardour in the pursuit of knowledge. Having acquired all that his native city could impart, he repaired to Bagdat, where there was supposed to be more learn- ing and more orthodoxy than in any other part of the Mohammedan world. At Bagdat, he formed an acquaintance with Abu Hamid Algazali, one of the most learned doctors of the period. This Al- gazali had written a book which the cadi of Cordova had pi'onounced heretical, and which in the opinion of many other doc- tors contained propositions dangerous to Islam. The emperor Ali had been called upon to sanction the condemnation, and the obnoxious book had been everywhere committed to the flames. Great was the rage of Algazali on hearing the fate of his beloved writings ; and he prayed that botli the judges who had condemned, and A BD ABD the monarcli who had confii-med the'de- cree, might be visited with the fate which they had passed upon his book. The imprecation was loudly uttered in the presence of the stranger student, who, participating in the wrath of the rest, ex- claimed to his master, " Add one thing to thy curse, that I may be the instru- ment for carrying it into effect !" and the teacher did so. This exclamation ren- dered him a favourite of Algazali, whose peculiar doctrines he embraced with avi- dity, and after some residence in Bagdat, he became their apostle in Mauritania. He did not, however, so slavishly adhere to them, as not to inculcate a few of his own ; for whatever might be his affection for his master, he had a great deal moi'e for himself ; and he was inordinately ambitious, — ambitious of temporal no less than of spiritual authority. Yet for some time, his preaching was ineffec- tual, and from more mosques than one, in which he ventured to inveigh against the ruling powers, he was glad to escape with more precipitation than became the dignity of a doctor. On his way to Tre- mecen, he for the first time met with Abdel-mumen, then a youth, of whose previous history we kriow nothing. The boldness, the fanaticism, the incipient knavery of this youth, rendered him so agreeable to Mohammed, that from this moment their destiny was united, and together they planned that stupendous fabric of imposture which so long sur- vived them. Emboldened by the coun- sels of this new disciple, this friend, this ally, the learned missionary assumed a dif- ferent tone. Entering the great mosque of Morocco, he seized on the highest seat. "That seat is not for thee," was the exclamation of a grave teacher, " it belongs to the imam, the prince of the faithful !" " The temples belong to Allah and Allah alone !" was the reply of Mo- hammed, taken from a celebrated chapter of the Koran ; and he mmiediately recited the following passages, on which he com- mented as he went along. In the midst of this exhibition, and before the proper devotions of the day commenced, Ali entered, and all rose to salute him except Mahommed, who scorned to honour him even by a glance. When the service was concluded, however, he approached the monarch, and in the hearing of all present, denounced on him the vengeance of Allah if he did not immediately cor- rect the abuses under which his people gi'oaned. Ali regarded him at first as one of the devout ascetics, — one of the 38 popular saints to whom custom permits great liberty of speech. Yet subse- quently, he caused the avowed princi- ples of the man to be examined, and they were found to contain so much that was dangerous, that he was advised to stifle them in their birth. But he was satisfied with banishing the new prophet from Morocco. This was not a punishment ; on the contrary, it added to the reputa- tion of Mohammed, who retired to the solitary places of the vicinity, where he was soon visited by many who longed for a change. That his eloquence was great, is affirmed by all his biogra- phers ; that he had the gift of prophecy, was believed by the vulgar. He in- veighed against the vices, the tyranny, the impiety of the reigning dynasty ; and so many listened to him with evident pleasure, that Ali ordered hun to be seized. But he had timely warning of the fate intended him, and he fled to Tinmal, in the province of Suz, where he was joined by many disciples, — men who were ready either to suffer or to fight in his cause. The success of Mohammed may be easily explained. He asserted that the great Mehedi, or twelfth imam, the doc- tor and teacher of all the faithful, was about to re-appear. Most readers are little aware of the disputes among the doctors of Islam, respecting the dig- nity and person of this supreme chief. Some contend that it is essentially divine, and restricted to one holy family, like the priesthood in the house of Aaron ; others, that it is subordinate to the khalifat, and may be exercised by any family to which it may be confided ; others again, that it is an office entirely prophetic, and has no connexion with worldly dignities. All agree, however, that the imam for the time being had an omnipotent power in matters of religion, and that to resist his infallible will in the slightest matter was rebellion against heaven. The more numerous portion of the Moslems, — in fact all who have any claim to orthodoxy — restrict the office to Ali (see the name) the son-in-law and cousin of Mahomet, and the descendants of Ali. All agree that twelve personages invested with it, have appeared. 1. Ali, the 4th khalif. 2. Hassan, the eldest son of Ali, 5th khalif, who abdicated. 3. Hussein, a younger son of Ali, who fell in the battle of Kerbela. 4. Ali, surnamed Zin-alab-eddin, eld- est son of Hussein. A BD A BD 5. Mohammed Bakir, son of the pre- ceding. 6. Giafar Sadik, son of the preceding. 7. Muza al Kiadhem, son of the pre- ceding. 8. Ali Ridha, son of the preceding. 9. Ahu Giafar Mohammed, son of the preceding. 10. Ali Askeri, sumamed Al-zek, son of the preceding. 1 1 . Hassan ' Askeri, son of the pre- ceding. 12. Mohammed Abnl Cassim, son of the preceding. As the last of these great imams, — all of All's second house, — lived in the third and fourth centinries of the Hejira, (a. d. 869 — 938,) the existence of the twelve generations was included within three centuries. Of these twelve imams, the Shiites speak with the highest veneration, — as beings superior to mankind. They are the idolaters rather than followers of Ali and his descendants. The office of imam, they assert, must not be considered merely as a point of discipline, but as a fundamental article of faith ; and that the person is no less divine. Where the succession is not in the privileged family of Ali, there can be no virtue in devo- tion ; — a curse, not a blessing, must rest on the faith of Islam. By a natural and even necessary inference, the Shiites held Ali and his posterity to be divine. Some of them went farther still, and in- sisted that Ali was either an emanation of the divine nature, or an incarnation of God himself; and consequently that all religion consists in the true know- ledge of, and obedience to, the true imam. But the Khoreg'ites, or rebels, utterly scouted these notions. They contended that any Arabian, bond or free, if possessed of the necessary learn- ing and virtue, might exercise the func- tions of imam ; that he was not infallible, but might sin ; that if he did sin, he might be deposed and put to death. But these were desperate heretics — rebels, as their name imports, to the spiritual autho- rity of the holy family — and were few in comparison with the Shiites. Their opinions, however, have survived them. At the present day, the Tm-ks reject Ali ; while the Persians, who are Shiites, curse the first three khalifs after Ma- homet, as usurpers of the authority which Ali alone shoidd have exercised. It is about the twelfth of these imams, Mohammed Abid Cassmi, that so many fables have been invented by the Shiites, 39 and by all who follow the house of Ali. He was the only son of Hassan, the eleventh pontiff; and at nine years of age his mother enclosed him in a cave, where he remained until his last day. That he was concealed during his whole life, is certain ; nor can we have any dif- ficidty in finding the motive, — fear of the khalifs belonging to the dynasty of Abbas, the implacable enemies of the house of Ali. Hence the secrecy of his communication with his followers, whom he never saw, and whom he directed through the agency of a few tried mes- sengers. Some writers assert that he died in a. h. 326, others in a. h. 330. But there are not a few bold enough to assert that he never died at all ; that he still lives in the same grotto, inaccessible to mortals. All agree that, whether living or dead, he will re-appear before the end of the world ; unite all the Mo- hammedan sects ; and bring into the bosom of Islam all Christians, all idola- ters, all mankind. During the greater part of a millennium, he has been ex- pected by the Moslems with as much anxiety as the Messiah by the Jews. It must, however, be observed that by the more rigid of the orthodox, he is to be rather the apostle than the operator of this change ; that Christ is to effect this union of all religious creeds ; that the latter will appear on earth a second time, embrace the faith of Islam, beget chil- dren, and kill antichrist ; and that the great Mehedi will be the Elias, the fore- runner of our Saviour's second advent. In consequence of the general expecta- tion of the coming of the Mehedi, it was natural to suppose that many claimants to this high office should arise, when so many in the early history of the church assumed that of Elias and the Messiah. Thus in the reign of Al Mohdi, the third khalif of the Abbassides, the famous impostor, Hakem Ebn Haschen, sur- named Al-Mokanna, or the veiled, a native of Khorasan, declared himself this expected prophet, — this incarnation of deity, whom all the Shiites ought to follow.* Thus also Baber, (see both names,) assumed prophetic office in Adherbijan, and during twenty years defied the power of the reigning khalif. Thus also Mohammed Ben Abdalla, and his colleague Abdel-mumen, took advan- tage of the popular credulity. For some time, this impostor, though • Our poet, Moore, has rendered this personage familiar to every reader, as " The Veiled Prophet of Khorasan.", ABD ABD zealously preaching the immediate ap- pearance of the Mehedi, was not so bold as to call himself the mighty pro- phet. At length, however, when the credulity of his followers ensured success to the pretension, he and Abdel-mumen devised the manner in which the long- suppressed communication should be made to the world. One day, when he had been long expatiating in the public mosque on the blessings which the pre- destined teacher was to produce, Abdel- mumen arose, and said, " Thou preachest to us the coming of the Mehedi : thou art he ; and we are ready to obey thee in all things as our temporal and spiri- tual ruler!" In accordance, no doubt, with a previously concerted scheme, many of the assembled chiefs arose from their seats, and vowed an undying fidelity. From this moment, he assumed the awful title of Mehedi ; he established a two-fold government ; nine ministers, at the head of whom was Abdel-mumen, formed his executive government ; and subordinate to these, were seventy coun- sellors, all Maiuitanian chiefs, or chiefs who, though spmng from the ancient Arab race, had long been located in these extensive regions. And let it not be supposed that there were no subjects to be governed : many powerful tribes acknowledged the new potentate ; an army of 10,000 horse and twice the number of foot were soon devoted to his interests. Alarm now seized on the soul of Ali. It was in the year of the Hejira 515, corresponding to a. d. 1121, that he ordered the wall of Suz to assaidt the rebels before greater reinforcements should have arrived. Unable to cope with the enemy, the Avali invoked the aid of the supreme government, and of Ibrahim, the brother of Ali, with troops formidable enough to crush the insur- rection at a blow. But little did the imperial brothers know the spirit which animated the proselytes, or the moral contagion which had spread amongst their own people. At the very onset the Almoravides fled ! A second battle was more fiercely contested, but victory again declared for Abdel-mumen. In great haste the troops of Ali were re- called from Spain, and a vast army was led against the rebels ; two more vic- tories followed in rapid succession, and the dynasty of the Almohades, viz. of the Unitarians, — of those who worshipped the unity of the godhead, and wlio de- clared inextinguishable war against all pagans, all idolaters, all who acknow- 40 ledged more than one God, — was now in existence. The inaccessible fortress of Tinmal, placed on the wildest peak of the Daren chain, enabled these holy banditti to defy the world. But to re- main in fortresses was no part of Mo- hammed's scheme, or of his minister, Abdel-mumen. In 519, the latter be- sieged Morocco, and for the first time his arms were unsuccessful : he was compelled to retreat, but this he effected in an orderly manner. Severe as was the loss of the Almohades, Abdel-mumen yet lived ; and this, in the opinion of Mohammed, was sufficient to counter- balance the disasters of the siege. For about three years, the Almohades re- mained tranquil : time was necessary to collect troops, and to make them forget the past misfortime. In 523, Abdel- mumen, at the head of 30,000 horse and a corresponding number of infantry, again tried the fortune of war. The Mehedi Avas worn out by sickness, but the vigour of his mind survived ; and when conferring on his minister and favourite the spiritual dignity of imam, he felt assured of future success. The general was victorious, and on his return to Tinmal, he perceived that sickness had made great havoc on the frame of the Mehedi. In a few days, Mohammed con- voked his chiefs, advised them to perse- vere in the heavenly doctrine, and soon afterwards expired. What form of govern- ment should be adopted ? The inspired leader was no more ; and could his hea- venly gifts be transferred to any other mortal ? It was agreed that they could : a monarchy at once spiritual and temporal was resolved upon ; and Abdel-mumen, the general of the pm'e faith, the column of the true religion, the friend, the con- fidant, the minister of the deceased Me- hedi, was unanimously proclaimed Imam and Almumenin, or supreme head of the religion and government. If Abdel-mumen had, as a mere gene- ral, exhibited so much valour in the field, his spirit of enterprise was not likely to be weakened on seeing himself invested with the majesty of the khalifat. So rapid were his successes, that all Fez, all Teza, the whole region from Sale to Darah, soon acknowledged his two-fold yoke. On the death of Ali (a.h. 537, or A.D. 1143,) and the accession of Taxfin, the son of Ali, who had shown great va- lour in Spain, hopes were entertained by his people that the career of Abdel-mu- men would be arrested. But if the latter was once checked, he was victorious in ABD A B D two subsequent actions ; and Taxfin was besieged in Tremecen ; at the head of a desperate body of horsemen, he cut his way through the besiegers, and threw himself into Oran, whence he hoped to escape into Andahisia ; but Oran was also besieged ; and when amidst the si- lence of night the unfortunate emperor endeavoured to gain a vessel which awaited him, he mistook his way, fell down a precipice, and, at morning's dawn, was found dashed to pieces. Oran capitidated, and Abdel-mumen entered it in A.H. 540. Some cities, however, among which were Morocco and Fez, still held for the Almoravides, who raised Ibra- him Abu Ishac, son of Taxfin, to the vacant throne. But Ibrahim was a ten- der youth ; his inexperience could avail nothing against the veteran Abdel-mu- men : Tremecen was taken by assaidt ; Fez shared the same fate ; Morocco was besieged, and at length taken ; Ibrahim was put to death ; a general massacre followed ; the wild hordes of the desert were brought to re-people the silent streets ; and Abdel-mumen was the un- disputed monarch of all the vast regions which had constituted the empire of the Almoravides. ^ While these successes were passing in Africa, the generals of Abdel-mumen were subduing such fortresses of Spain as held for the fallen dynasty. In the sequel they proclaimed him emperor of all Moham- medan Spain. That he aimed at the entire conquest of the country, is evident from his proclaiming the Albiged, or holy war, and collecting troops from all the countries between the Great Desert and Ceuta, between Tunis and the ocean. But in the midst of his mighty prepa- rations death assailed him, the eighth day of Jumadi II., 5.58, which con-esponds to the 16th day of May, 1163. His cha- racter will be sufficiently clear from his exploits. Without him Mohammed would never have been venerated as a prophet ; without him the empire of the Almo- hades would never have been founded. (D'Herbelot, Bibliotheque Orientale, sub vocibus. Casiri, Bib. Arab. Hisp. Escu- rial, torn. ii. Conde, Historia de la Do- minacion de los Arabes en Espaiia.) ABDEL-REZZAK, founder of the d3Tiasty of the Sarbedarians, whose capi- tal was Schezwar in Khorasan. His early life was passed in the service of Abu Said, sidtan of the Mongul Tartars of Transoxiana. But he was a dishonest steward ; and his peculations would have led to his destruction had they been dis- 41 covered before the death of Abu Said. Knowing that the people were disaffected, owing to the tyranny of a \azir, he pro- claimed himself the redresser of wrongs, the champion of the poor : by this means he won the confidence of the multitude, and in the com-se of a few years he obtained the supreme authority. The djTiasty whicli he founded, however, was of short duration : it embraced in- deed twelve princes, but their r.eigns were comprised within the brief period of thii-ty-five years — viz. fi'om a. h. 737 to 772, (a.d. 1337—1371.) The end of most was tragical : Abdel-rezzak himself was killed by leaping from a high window to escape the fury of a brother. The last prince of this line joined Timur, whose empire absorbed the petty sove- reignties which had once formed the monarchy of Ghengis Khan. ABDERAHMAN BEN ABDALLA,* viceroy of Spain in the eighth century for the khalif Yezid. To this high dig- nity he succeeded at a period most criti- cal for the Mohammedan arms, — just as Alsama ben Melio had perished under the walls of Thoulouse, and as the faith of Islam had received its first great check south of the Pyrenees. He saved the remnant of the Moslem host, and de- fended Narbonne against the whole power of the Franks. For a short time he was superseded by the emir of Almagreb, or Western Africa, who, as the vicar of the khalif, nominated the dependent govern- ors of Spain ; but it was found that he only was equal to the difficidties of the station, and he was restored amidst the universal shouts of the army. His second administration is memorable in the an- nals of christian Europe. Having pu- nished the guilty tyrants, who, during the preceding administrations, had en- joyed as much impunity as they could desire ; having restored to the christian portion of the inhabitants the substance of which they had been despoiled ; hav- ing exercised justice to victors and van- quished with an impartiality exceedingly rare in a Mohammedan governor, he turned his mind to a project which he had long formed, — that of not only repairing the disasters which the arms of the Pro- phet had so recently experienced, but of carrying the ensigns of his faith through the heart of France and Germany, and of planting them on the shores of the Baltic. If he was a bold, he was not a * Very erroneously as well as defectively treated in the Biog. Univ. The name of this emir in full is Abdul-Rahaman ben AbdooUah el Grafeeky. ABD ABD rash man ; he was sensible enough of the dangers which menaced his entei-prize ; and to neutralize them, he raised in Western Africa and Spain an army more numerous than any that had yet invaded France. At its head he proceeded to- wards the Pyrenees, and despatched orders to Othman ben Abi Neza, (known in christian history as Manuzza), to lay waste the province of Aquitaine. But Othman was the secret ally of duke Eudes ; the daughter of that prince was his wife ; he had concluded a long truce with the Christians ; he was envious of Abderahman's glory ; and he acquainted Eudes with the approaching danger. The viceroy, aware of this correspondence, ordered Othman to be seized and put to death ; and his lovely wife was trans- ferred to the harem of the khalif at Damascus. The progress of Abderah- man was destructive ; he consumed eveiy thing with fire and sword ; but he foimd the French, with the allied Germans near Tours, prepared to receive him ; and the defeat which he sustained at the hands of Charles Martel, was one of the most signal ever inflicted on the enemies of our faith. Europe was saved ; a ge- neral Te Deiim resounded from one ex- tremity to the other ; the barbarians were no longer dreaded ; their loss had effec- tually humbled them. On this great day (733) Abderahman himself was mun- bered among the slain. (D'Herbelot, Bibliotheque Orientale. Conde, Historia de la Dominacion. Gibbon's Decline and Fall. ) ABDERAHMAN BEN CABA,oneof the Arabian viceroys of Spain in the eighth century. Son of the virtuous Caba ben Albegag, whose impartial administration had been a blessing, he tried to emidate the noble deeds of his father. On the plains of Calatrava, he trimnphed over Baleg the Syrian, one of the most feroci- ous rebels of that period. The authority which he exercised, however, was of a precarious nature ; he was not acknow- ledged by a fourth of Spain ; and the short period in which he appears on the stage of history, was passed in quelling other rebels, or rather other aspirants to the supreme power in this distant pro- vince. ABDERAHMAN BEN MOARWA,* (or j4bdul Rahaman ben Moawyah,) the first king of Spain of the house of Omeya (731 — 787). During forty-five years after the descent of the Arabs in Spain, there • Another of the lives most inadequately treated in all the biographical collections. 42 was universal anarchy in that kingdom. The emir of Almagreb, or Western Africa, on whose government Spain was a de- pendency, was too miicli occupied in exciting rebellion at home to have much leism-e for other affairs. The local governors appointed by him, or by the khalif of Damascus, seemed to be in- tent on one object only, that of enrich- ing themselves by the plunder of the people. So many viceroys succeeded each other in rapid succession, that, from the precarious tenure of office, they were the more eager to turn it to advantage. This state of things was affliction to the people ; loud were the complaints which arose on every side ; a wish was earnestly expressed for some permanent governor, who, being invested with the plenitude of authority, could decide on every affair of importance, without awaiting the orders of the African emir, or of the more dis- tant khalif. The anarchy, inseparable from the position of these governors, was increased by the war at Damascus be- tween the house of Omeya and that of Abbas. Meruan H. the fourteenth khalif of that house, was defeated and slain by Abul Abbas Azefiah, descended from Ab- bas the uncle of Mahomet, and founder of the dynasty of the Abassides. This new dynasty was pi'oclaimed in Spain as in Africa ; but many chiefs, from attach- ment to the fonner race of monarchs, refused obedience to their successors. Hence there was not, and could not be, any security for person or substance in this distracted pi'ovince. To avert the utter ruin of the Mohammedan cause in Spain, about sixty chiefs assembled at Cordova, in the year 754, and Hayut of Emessa drew a melancholy pictm-e of the state of things. He declared that nothing could save them except a firm local government, wholly independent of the East. All present, who were the secret adherents of the Omeyas, received his discourse with applause, but where was a prince to be found able to defend them ? Had not all of the holy race perished — all been treacherously slaugh- tered by the usurping Abid Abbas ? " No," replied Wahib ben Zair, whose in- teresting relation may be thus abridged : — Two sons of Meruan, the last khalif of the Omeyas, had accidentally escaped the general massacre of their kinsmen. As Abul Abbas showed no disposition to injure them (never was duplicity better practised than by the heads of the Mo- hammedan world), they were easily in- duced to reside at the court of the new ABD ABD khalif. Perhaps he did not originally intend to remove them, unless there should be a rising in their favour ; per- haps he thought his throne too well esta- blished to be shaken by two powerless youths. But he always beheld them with jealousy ; spies were not wanting to inflame the sentiment ; and he at length gave the order for their execution. Su- leyman suffered immediately ; Abderah- man was at the moment absent from Damascus ; and when informed, as he soon was, by a trusty friend, of the un- expected tragedy, he fled in a disguise to the Bedoween Ai-abs. Here he was re- ceived with the hospitality which his birth and misfortunes demanded. But he was too near Damascus ; and not- withstanding the dangers which accom- panied his steps, he fled into Eg}'pt, and thence to the West. Here the governor of Barca, hearing that a young stranger had sought refuge with an Arab tribe, and suspecting that it was Abderahman, marched at midnight a troop of cavalry to the place where the tribe was encamped. The address of his friendly host saved him from the peril : the horsemen wei-e sent in a wrong direc- tion ; and Abderahman fled to Tabart, in Mam-itania, where the noble tribe of Zeneta eagerly received him. "There," concluded the speaker Wahib, " he now is : let him be our sovereign." The proposal of the aged sheik was re- ceived with acclamation ; and he was com- missioned by the assembly to offer the throne to the last scion of the Onieyas. The difficulties of the enterprise were not concealed from the prince ; the unsettled state of the country, its hostile factions, and the desire of all for independence, were candidly exposed; but in return, he was assured that he might rely on the aid of many stout hearts. The severe school in which he had been trained had given new vigour to his character. He felt that he was equal to any vmder- taking ; and whatever its issue, it was preferable to the precarious and danger- ous state in which he had long been. With the consent of the tribe, therefore, which had so hospitably received him, he accepted the proposal, and with 750 men of that tribe he landed in Anda- lusia early in the year 755. By all who prefeiTed tranquillity to discord, by all who sighed for a settled government, he was received with open arms. His per- sonal qualities increased the feeling in his favour ; and in his march to Seville, which was truly a splendid scene, 20,000 43 scymitars attended him. But Yussuf, the usurping viceroy, and his friend Samail, who exercised an independent sovereignty over several provinces, were not disposed to surrender an empire without a straggle ; and in his march to Cordova, the new king was assailed by a considerable force. Victory declared for him. While besieging that ancient city, he was again assailed by an army 40,000 strong : again he conquered, and Cordova became his. A third victory over Yussuf and Samail was still more decisive, and both were compelled to sue for peace, which was granted them on favourable terms. All these successes were obtained in a single year. In the sequel Yussuf rebelled, was vanquished, and slain. His three sons renewed the contest. The event was not more propitious to them than it had been to the father. In the first battle the eldest was left on the field ; in the second an- other was made captive, and consigned to the dungeons of Cordova ; in the third, the youngest was also made prisoner, and safely lodged in one of the fortresses of Toledo. That Abderahman should thus spare the rebels, argues well for the ex- cellence of his heart. But he had to govern spirits which no clemency could touch. The house of Abbas had many partisans in the peninsula : if one army was defeated, a second arose ; and the captive of one day was the general of the next. The African emirs, all dependent on that house, were not slow to foment the troubles of Spain. The reign of the new monarch was passed in crushing rebellion. In 778 a warrior more formid- able than all of them, Charlemagne, entered the field against him. His inac- tivity on this occasion was doubtless owing to his weakness : he could not contend with the mighty Christian ; and surrounded as he was by the adherents of a rival power, he could not leave the southern provinces to encounter a potent enemy in Arragon and Catalonia. But Charlemagne was recalled by a revolt of the Saxons ; and was in the sequel too much occupied to revisit Spain. And v/hen the house of Abbas removed its throne from Damascus to Bagdut, the offices of so distant a province were neg- lected, and the king was less troubled by hired foes ; though the kinsmen of Yussuf, and all who had participated in the license of preceding times, were ready enough to take up arms whenever the opportunity arrived. Nor did the reign of Abderahman pass without some hos- A BD ABD tllities with the infant state of the Astu- rias. Once, or perhaps twice, his generals were defeated by Fruela I. ; but the ad- vantage could not have been very deci- sive, if, as we have strong reason to believe, the king of Cordova was acknow- ledged the superior of the Asturias, and received tribute from his feudatory. The short intervals of peace enjoyed by this monarch, enabled him to enlarge and embellish Cordova his capital. By naiTowing the bed of the Guadalquivir, he reclaimed a considerable portion of land, which he converted into magnifi- cent gardens. In the midst rose a tower of prodigious height. He was probably the first Arab who transplanted the palm into Western Europe ; and there is still extant one of his poetical effusions to that beautifid tree. It is of a sombre character, strongly expressive of the cares which daily and hourly distiubed his rest. The active duties of i-oyalty, however, left him little time for indiil- ging in mournfid reflections : when he had no eneiny in the field, his time was occupied in the duties of administration, in the reformation of the tribunals, in the erection of fortresses, in the construc- tion of ships. This great prince died in 787. Just, humane, enlightened ; faithful to his friends, clement to his enemies, compre- hensive in his views, brave in the battle- field, active in the discharge of every duty, he was just such a man as the occasion required. A hero and a legis- lator, he was of great service to Moham- medan Spain. (D'Herbelot, Bibliotheque. Casiri, Bib. Arab. Conde, Historia. Dun- ham's Spain and Portugal.) ABDERAHMAN II., {ov Jbdid Rah- aman ben All Hakem, surnamed El Mussaffer, or The Victorioiis,) the fourth Ommiade monarch of Spain, succeeded his father Al Hakem, in a. h. 206, or A. D. 822. His reign was a ti-oubled one. First and foremost was domestic rebel- lion, the curse of all Mohammedan go- vernments. Next were the hostilities of the Christian kings of Leon, who Avere not likely to remain his vassals, when they saw his natural subjects re- sist him with something like impimity. Then the French emperor, or the vassals of France, frequently invaded Catalonia and Arragon. Lastly, the Scandinavians ravaged the coasts from Galicia to Andalusia, and committed great depredations in the neighboinhood of Seville especially. Of that important city they retained possession for some 44 time, — a proof that they must have ar- rived in much greater numbers than is generally allowed. Yet with all these disasters the reign of Abderahman is mentioned with great respect by Moham- medan writers. In the first place, when he did take the field, his arms were generally successful ; and if his people suffered, it was because the enemies in many instances dispersed before he coidd reach them. In the second place, he was a magnificent patron of letters, and literary men were sure to praise him. In the third, he pleased the mul- titude by the improvements which he introduced into Cordova. If the erection of new mosques satisfied the devout, and the constniction of fountains the luxuri- ous, the populace had quite as much reason to be gratified with the pavement of the streets and with the aqueducts, — the former at least a novelty in Spain, and the latter scarcely known since the Roman times. How, amidst the anxie- ties of rebellion, and of pei"petual war on his frontiers, Abderahman could find leisure or inclination for literary pursuits, for the society of learned men who flocked to his court from all parts of the Moslem world, and still more for the cidtivation of poetry, might sui-prise us, did we not know that a Mussidman resigns himself with singular complacence to his lot : ' It is the work of fate ; to resist it therefore is madness : enjoy the blessings within thy reach, which the same fate has sent thee.' Abderahman was a just king; he made no distinction between the great and the little, between the Mohammedan and the Christian ; — no distinction, we mean, as far as the administration of the law was concerned ; for that he put the Christians to death for speaking against the Arabian prophet, will be seen in the Martyrs of Cordova. See Perfecto, Au- RELio, EuLOGio, &c. He died a. d. 852. (D'Herbelot. Conde. Dimham.) ABDERAHMAN III.,* (Abdul Ra- haman ben Mohammed, surnamed Al Nassir Ledin Allah, protector of God's worship,) was the son of Mohammed, and grandson of Abdalla, whom he suc- ceeded in 912. He was the eighth Ommiade monarch of Spain, and the first that assumed the holy attributes of the khalifat. The title of Emir al Mumenin, or Prince of the Believers, a title which most of the old Spanish chroniclers have corrupted into Mira- molin, was assmned by him soon after his * Very inaccurate in all the existing biogra- phical collections. ABD A BD accession, conjointly Avith that of Al Nassir Ledin Allah. Why he should either voluntarily adopt, or be invested with, a title which none of his seven predecessors had used, and which had hitherto been confined to the khalifs of the East, we should vainly inquu-e. — From his infancy this prince was a favovu-ite with the people, and nothing could equal their joy when his grandfather Abdalla declared him Wall Alhadi, or presump- tive heu" to the monarchy, in preference to the gloomy Almudafar, the son of Abdalla. Like his predecessors, he had to contend with rebellion. When he ascended the throne, nearly one half of the kingdom was in possession of Calib ben Omar, who reigned at Toledo. To chastise this adventurer, the khalif took the field at the head of 40,000 men, and triumphed, though not without difficulty, and not without the lapse of many years. The truth is, that when any one of the local walls was dissatisfied with the mo- narch of Cordova, or with the ministers of that monarch, he had only to shut himself up in his strongest fortress, (and Spain was full of them,) and enter into alliance with some one of the Christian princes, by whom he was sure to be sup- ported. Above forty years passed away before Toledo owned the lawful authority of Abderahman. — In his transactions with the Christians of Leon and the Asturias, we find enough of contradiction. It is certain that hostilities between the t-^-o powers were almost continual ; and that victory alternately visited the banners of each. All the Christian biographers of Abderahman assure us that in the battle of Zamora against Don Romiro II. he lost 100,000 men. The truth, however, is, that on that memorable occasion he had only 80,000 to command; and that he should lose one half or one quarter of that number, will not be readily credited, when we find that he returned slowly to Cordova, and that he took Zamora by assault in his retreat. Perhaps, how- ever, as one account states, he left 20,000 men to invest that important fortress, while with the rest of the army he returned to his capital. The Mo- hammedan writers assure us, that so far from being the vanquished, he was the victor in that great battle. Yet the ad- vantage no doubt lay with the king of Leon ; but it was so trifling a one as not to deserve mention, were it not the subject of so much contradiction. — In his African Avars, Abderahman was not very suc- cessful. He made conquests, indeed, but 45 he could not presei-ve them. In his reign Ave perceive more of splendour than of advantage ; he Avon battles, but made no durable conquests ; and by his lavish ex- penditm-e he destroyed the vitals of his country. Yet that reign is, beyond all doubt, the most brilliant period in the history of the Spanish Arabs. He Avas distinguished for many great qualities; his mind Avas comprehensive, his love of justice remarkable, his liberality exces- sive, his taste refined. About tAvo leagues from Cordova, rose his most splendid erection,*— an erection Avhich, in the description of Mohammedan writers, may vie Avith any that fairy land ever produced. This Avas the palace and toAver of Medina Azhara, so called from a favourite mistress. If, as Ave are assured, " the roof of the palace was supported by four thousand pillars of variegated marble;" if "the floors and Avails Avere of the same costly material;" if "the chief apartments Avere adorned Avith ex- quisite fountains and baths;" if, in the magnificent and most extensive gardens which sm-rounded it, " a pavilion arose, resting on pillars of Avhite marble orna- mented Avith gold;" if in the centre of this pavilion " a fountain of quicksilver constantly played, reflecting in a neAV and Avondi'ous manner the rays of the sun;" if the Avhole of the palace was thus exquisitely built, and if the toAver also had a mosque Avhich might vie Avith the magnificent one of Cordova, (and the description by the Arabian Avriters is remarkably explicit,) then indeed Ave may affirm that the most splendid descriptions in the Thousand and One Nights have a better foundation than is commonly sup- posed. In other respects, the magnifi- cence of this monarch was more worthily displayed. He greatly augmented the navy ; he gaA'e the utmost encourage- ment to commeixe ; he caused the most usefid, no less than the most elegant manufactm-es to flourish ; he rewarded industry, science, art, and above all lite- rature, with a liberality truly imperial ; and his paternal care Avas not confined to Cordova ; it extended to many other cities of Mohammedan Spain. YetAvith all this splendour, Avith a fame which the most distant nations admired, Abderahman was not to be envied. He himself declares, that during fifty years of empire his happy days were only four- teen ! The truth is, that notAvithstand- ing the civil commotions of his reign, — • commotions which aff"ected him less deeply than we should suppose, — which. ABD ABD he regarded as necessary evils, to be borne with stoical indifference — he was too prosperous to be happy. Amidst all the delights which the world could fur- nish, venerated as the vicar of God's Prophet, and exercising the most un- bounded despotism over millions of in- habitants, in a country which art and nature had transformed into a paradise, he heard not the feeble voice of war on his distant frontiers ; still less did the efforts of rebellion, which he was sure ultimately to suppress, disturb his tran- quillity. Uniform sweetness must cloy any palate. Some of his verses display a remarkable despondency ; and though they are too much laboured to be literally understood, — for the gi-ief which seeks for elegant words, which luxuriates in description, cannot be profoundly deep, — no doubt can be entertained that to him life was an object of indifference. Much of this state of mind was the effect of remorse : he had put to death his eldest son Abdalla. Unfettered, like most of the Moslem princes, by the strict laws of succession, he had declared his se- cond son Al Hakem to be Wall Alhadi, or heir to the throne. Abdalla durst not openly complain ; but he entered into a conspiracy, of which the object seems to have been the destruction of Al Hakem. It was discovered ; Abdalla was thrown into prison, and his death decreed. Many chiefs interceded for the prince, but in vain. Even Al Hakem begged for the life of his brother, but Avith equal fruit- lessness. This trait of magnanimity in his favourite son, was appreciated by Abdei-ahman. He praised it ; he de- clared that if he wei'e a private indi- vidual, Abdalla should be pardoned ; but he was a king, and in justice to his peo- ple, the execution must take place. It did take place, but it produced no ap- plause ; on the contrary, it was con- demned. The act poisoned the remainder of Abderahman's existence on earth. — (D'Herbelot, Bibliotheque. Casiii, Bib. Arab. Conde, Historia de la Dominacion. Dunham, Spain and Portugal.) ABDERAHMAN EBN MOHAM- MED, a Mohammedan general of the seventh century. He served with much distinction under the khalifs Moawia Yezid I., and Abdelmelek. In Persia and Cabul his success was great ; it excited the jealousy of his superior, who insulted him, and converted him into a rebel. Being defeated by the troops of Abdalmelek, he took refuge in Cabul ; repaired into Khorasan ; was 46 driven again into Cabul, where he no longer found the same hospitality. By the king of that country, who feared the generals of the khalif, he was be- headed in the year 702. ABDER-REZZAK, (Kemal-eddin,) a Persian traveller and historian of the fifteenth century. His father, Ishac, a native of Samarcand, had been the imam and cadi of a royal son of Timur, and was enabled to give him a good educa- tion. His commentary on a grammatical treatise celebrated among the Persians, procured him the same dignity as his father had held. In 1442 he left Herat, visited Arabia, Calicut, Bisnagar, and other parts of India, on a mission at once political and commercial, from the shah his master. In three years he re- turned, found his master dead, and Abu Said Mirza fighting for the throne. On recognising the sultan he was favour- ably received, and enabled to devote his future life to literary and religious pur- suits. The most important of his works is a history of the house of Timur, down to the year 1470 : it is in the royal library at Paris. It was translated by Galland, but never published. It is to be hoped that the Oriental Translation Society will not overlook this and similar works. ABDIAS of Babylon, a supposititious person, once believed to be the author of an apocryphal book, Historia Certaminis Apostolici. ABDISSI. See Ebed Jesu. ABDJESUS, (Saint,) a bishop of Cas- car, in Chaldea, suffered martyrdom by order of Isdegerd, king of Persia. See Abdas. ABDOLONYMUS, a prince of Sidon, so poor as to be compelled to cultivate his own garden. In this occupation, says Quintus Curtius, he was found by the emissaries of Ephestion, to whom Alex- ander the Great had confided the nomi- nation of a new king ; was adorned with the regal vestments, and brought before the conqueror. " How hast thou borne thy poverty ? " demanded the king. " Would to heaven," replied Abdolon- gurus, " I may support my prosperity as well!" Such is the popular relation, but it may well be distrusted. The work from which it is taken has been long dis- covered to be a I'omance ; and the cir- cumstances are very differently related by Diodorus and Plutarch. ABDON, (Saint,) a Persian Christian, who, together with his countryman Sen- 7ien, suffered martyrdom at Rome in the persecution of the emperor Decius. ABD ABP: ABDUL-HAMID, the youngest of the three sons of Achmet ; succeeded to the Turkish throne in 1774, on the death of his elder brother, Mustapha III. Little was he fitted for government : when called to the throne of Othman he was advanced in years, and the whole of his life had been passed, like a prisoner, in the seraglio. Great were the humili- ations which the Turkish arms sustained in the war with Russia. By the dis- graceful peace of Kainaiji the Porte ac- knowledged the independence of the Tartar tribes on the northern banks of the Euxine, and opened all her seas to Russian vessels. But Russia was not satisfied ; war was soon afterwards de- clared ; the Crimea was occupied ; and in spite of England and Sweden, aU the Turkish provinces north of the Danube were subdued. When Oczakof, the key of the Crimea, was taken, the Turkish ministers dared not inform Abdul-hamid of the fact. A fortress indeed, they observed, was lost to the empire ; but then it was not the great one of that name, — it was little Oczakof. The sultan was so ignorant of the geograpliy of his kingdom as to believe them, until he was undeceived by a maimed soldier in the streets. The soldier begged for charity ; he had lost a leg at the storming of that very fortress ; and he hoped the commander of the faithful would pity his misfortune. " So thou wast at the siege of Little Oczakof!" observed the sultan. "Little Oczakof! Does not thy highness know that there is only one Oczakof, and the Russians have it?" The sultan returned to his palace in great wrath, and punished his ministers : but that punishment coidd not recover his lost possessions ; and when he died in 1789, he left to his nephew, Selim IIL, an empire half mined. ABDUL-KERIM, a native of Cache- mir ; escaped the massacre ordered by Nadir Shah in 1738, and was taken into the favour of that monarch. He made the pilgrimage to Mecca, visited Medina and Delhi, and wrote his Memoirs, which are said to contain a very minute and very accurate account of the military opera- tions of his royal master. The greater portion of these Memoirs were translated and published by Gladwin, Calcutta, 1788. ABDUL-RAHIM, one of the most distinguished servants of the emperor Akbar; translated into Persian the com- mentaries of the emperor Babur. (Seethe name.) The Bibliotheque du Roi has a 47 MS. copy of this work, which was of gi-eat service to M. Langles in his account of India. The author died in 1627. ABEEL, (Vander James,) an English Jesuit, born a.d. 1659, admitted into the society at Watten, Sept. 7, 1671 ; died in the English college at St. Omer, Feb. 10, 1698. ABEILLE, (Gaspard,) a native of Biez, in Provence, 1648 ; an ecclesiastic and a dramatic writer, who died at Paris, 1718. His Argelie, Coriolan, Lyncee, and other pieces, were often represented ; but then- merit is small. He was in much favour with the great for the brilliancy of his conversational powers, and still more for a remarkable flexibility of coun- tenance, which spoke more impressively than words. ABEILLE, (Louis P. 1719—1807,) a native of Toulon, who wrote on agri- culture. ABEL, (Vandel Baldwin,) born a.d. 1638 ; died at St. Omer, Oct. 13, 1679. ABEL, king of Denmark in the thii-- teenth century, and one of the worst of his race. He had Sleswic and the south of Jutland ; his brother Eric had the rest of the kingdom, with the title of monarch. Eric he invited to an entertainment, and secretly mm-dered ; yet, as he pretended great sorrow for the loss of his beloved kinsman, aU Denmark believed him in- nocent, and he became (1250) monarch of the whole. But his crime went not impunished ; in 1252 he was surprised in his camp by the Frieslandei's, and slain. ABEL, (Gaspard, 1676 — 1763,) a preacher of Wertdorf,and a learned writer on Hebrew, Greek, and German anti- quities. He also wrote " Historia Monar- chiarum Orbis Antiqui." ABEL, (Frederic G. 1714—1794,) a physician of Halberstadt, who practised mucli, yet had no faith in his art. It wanted, he observed, solid principles : the organization of no two men is alike ; the same disease, therefore, in different individuals, cannot be cured by the same process ; yet is not the process generally the same? As he declared all medicine to be quackery, he would probably have done wisely had he adhered to his former vocation — the ministry. He was, how- ever, more attached to Juvenal and Per- sius, whom he translated, than to either St. Paul or Galen. ABEL, (Charles F. 1719—1787,) a German musician and disciple of Bach, who met with gi-eat success in his own country, in Poland, and in London, where he died. Though he composed ABE ABE nearly thirty pieces, he was chiefly esteem- ed as a musical pci-former. ABEL, (Clark, M.D. d. 1826,) prin- cipal medical officer and naturalist to the embassy of Lord Amherst to China in 1816. The loss of the Alceste on its return is so well known from Mr. MacLeod's Voyage of \he Alceste toChina, that it is only necessary to say, that Dr. Abel was a considerable sufl'erer by that event ; as much of what he had collected in China was lost, and the book, in which he gave an account of the em- bassy, was of course much injured by such a loss. It contains, however, very valuable information relative to the na- tural history of China. It is entitled. Narrative of a Joiuney in China, and of a Voyage to and from that Country in the Years 1816 and 1817. 4to. 1818. It contains an essay on the geology of the Cape of Good Hope, which is very highly spoken of. He had previously published a geological paper on the Himalaya mountains, in the Calcutta Asiatic Memoirs. R. Brown has given the title of Ahelia to a genus in botany, in honour of Dr. Abel. At the time of his death, he was surgeon to the go- vernor-general of India. (Biog. Univ. Ann. Obituary, &c.) ABEL, (N. H. 1802—1829,) a Nor- Avegian mathematician, who distinguished himself in an extraordinary manner, by his successful researches in some of the most difficult branches of analysis. In 1815 he entered the cathedral school of Christiania, and in 1820 published some papers on functions of one variable ; and afterwards, being allowed to travel for two years at the expense of the Swedish government, he ixrged Crelle to the pub- lication of his celebrated journal. In France, he abridged for Ferrussac's Bul- letin de Science, his own memoir on the impossibility of resolving generally equations of the 5th degree ; and he was anxious to read some papers on tran- scendental functions, to the Academic des Sciences. M. Fourier, after long solicitation, promised to print it, but it remained long unnoticed by the Society. In fact, at this time he met with no en- couragement at Paris, and he returned home neglected and disheartened, and took an inferior situation. This was in 1825, but in 1828 he had made himself so distinguished a name by his mathe- matical papers, that- some of the most celebrated scientific men of the day — Le Gendi-e, Poisson, Lacroix, and Mau- rice — di-ew up a letter, which they ad- 48 dressed to the king of Sweden, stating the extraordinary merit of this young man, and the advantages which woidd accrue to science by placing him in an atmospliere more congenial to his pur- suits than that of Christiania. This letter reflects the highest crecht on the feelings of those who sent it; but it was disre- garded ! Indeed, even the receipt of it was never acknowledged. The credit of this neglect must lie with Bernadotte ! Tlie letter was dated 15th September, 1828; and in May 1829, Abel died of a broken heart. The king of Prussia had sent, just previously, the oflPer of an ho- noiirable post in Berlin, to Abel, but the ofler never reached him, — it was too late. His death was deplored, as a loss to sci- ence, all over Europe. He whom, a year or two before, Paris had treated with cold indifference, was deeply and loudly lamented in France, in Germany, and Italy ! The king of Sweden ^'ro- mised to print, at his own exjoense, a collected edition of his works. It would be impossible here to enter into any of his deep researches : it may be sufficient to say, that besides papers in the Chris- tiania Journal, he published several in that of Schumacher, and twenty-one in that of Crelle ;* and that a kind of gene- rous rivalry existed between him and the celebrated Jacobi. His most remarkable papers are on Equations of the Fifth De- gree, and on Elliptic Functions. Poisson praises the generality and the novelty of his views, and places him among first- rate mathematicians. ABELA, (J. F.) a knight of Malta in the seventeenth century ; is well known for a book on that island, Malta Illus- trata, which appeared in 1647, and is much valued for its antiquarian informa- tion, and its general erudition. It was translated into Latin, and published in the vast collection of Graevius and Bur- mann, Thesaiuus Antiquitatum. ABELIN, (J. P.) a German historian of the seventeenth century ; is identical with J. L. Gottfried, a name which, for some whimsical reason, he assumed. He was engaged on that enormous compila- tion, Theatrum Em-opa»Um, in 21 vols, fol. ; in the Mercurius Gallo-Belgicus; in a Histoiy of the World, of India, &c. His merit as an historian is very small. ABELL, (John,) an English musician, much esteemed for his performances on the lute, by a good judge, Charles II. In 1688 he was dismissed from the chapel * The titles may be found in the tenth volume of Crelle. 1 ABR ABE royal because he was a papist, and he earned his living as he could. ABELLI, (Antoine, 1527 — 1596,) Abbe of Livry, an obscure friar of the order of Preachers, had, however, the good or bad luck to be the confessor of Cathe- rine de Medicis. His devotional compi- lations do not merit any farther mention. One thing, however, connected with them, deserves notice — the errors into which Bayle was led, while correcting Moreri and striving after extreme accuracy. (See the Biog. Universelle ; also Jos. Le Clerc, Lettre sur le Dictionnaire de Bayle.) ABELLI, (Louis, 1603—1691,) bishop of Rhodez, WTote some theological and biographical works, which were little es- teemed in his day, and are no longer read. ABEN-BITAR, (Abdalla benAhmed,) a celebrated naturalist and physician of Spain, who died at Damascus a. d. 1248. He is celebrated for a most usefiil work on all the herbs, plants, minerals, and animals used in medicine. ABEND ANA, (Jacob,) a Spanish Jew, and rabbi of a London congrega- tion, wrote a Spicilegium of explanations on the more obscure passages of Scripture. Another Avriter of this name, Isaac Abendana, resided in England, especially at Oxford, for some years. A work was written by him, entitled, Discourses of the Ecclesiastical and Civil Polity of the Jews. 1706. ABEN EZRA, (Abraham Ben Meir,) a celebrated Jewish rabbi of the twelfth century, and therefore a contemporary of Maimonides, who esteemed him so highly, that he enjoined his son to study his works continually. He travelled much, as the inscriptions (or epigi-aphs) to his works show, which profess to be printed in various countries. In 1145, he was in Mantua; 1156, in Rhodes; 1159, in England; and in 1167, in Rome. There is considerable doubt as to the epoch of his death ; but from a consideration of his age at the time, which is known to have been more than 70, and from other circumstances, De Rossi conjectures it to have taken place, A.D. 1168. He was a poet, a philosopher, and, if we may trust the accounts of him, an admirable mathematician and astrono- mer. His commentaries have been held in the highest estimation, but it is con- fessed that there is considerable laxity in some of his notions. His style is called by some, who probably never read a line of his works, ' ' clear, elegant, concise ; " and it is added, that " his conciseness sometimes VOL. I. 49 makes his style obscure." The young hebraist who attempts to read this " clear" author, will very soon find the truth of the latter observation. Dr. M'Caul, one of the most profound rabbinical scholars of the present day, thus briefly character- ises his commentaiy. " He {i. e. Rashi or R. Solomon) was succeeded in the next century by Abcn Ezra, who far surpassed him in power and freedom of judgment." (M'Caul's translation of Kimchi's Zachariah, Pref. p. viii.) And again, " Rashi, Aben Ezra, and Kimchi endeavom-ed to get I'id of the Christian interpretations, and Maimonides to root out the Christian doctrines which had de- scended from the ancient Jewish church. The controversialist is obliged to attack what is eiToneous, or even absm'd in the oral law ; and the ignorant or unthinking hastily conclude that all the Jewish writings are of tlie same cha- racter. The translation of Kimchi or Aben Ezra would soon undeceive them." (Id. pp. ix. X.) His commentary is printed in Buxtorf's Biblia Rabbinica on one side of the text, and that of Jarchi on the other. His chief works are — 1. A Commentary on the Bible. Printed in Buxtorf. Various parts of this have been published in Latin by Munster, Ge- nebrard, &c. Another Commentary on the Minor Prophets is still in MS. 2. Sodoth Hattorah ; Secrets of the Law. MS. in Bodleian and elsewhere. 3. Tov Shem ; The Good Name. 4. Ighereth Hashab- bath ; Letter of the Sabbath. 5. Chai Ben mekitz ; The Wakeful Son lives. 6. Jesud Mora ; The Foundation of Fear. MS. 7. Mogenaim ; a Hebrew grammar, Ven. 1546, and elsewhere. 8. Shaphah Berara; The Pure Lip. Constantinople, 1530. (Very rare.) 9. Tzacud ; or. Of Elegance : a gramma- tical work. Ven. 1546. 10. Shephath Jether ; Lips of Excellence : a gram- matical work. MS. 1 1 . Chitta ; on the Quiescent Letters (in Buxtorf's Bible, and translated into Latin by David Cohen. Leyd. 1658.) 12. Sod. MS. on the Form of the Letters. 13. Ormad Ham- mezimah ; Acuteness of Thought. MS. Vat. and Oppenheim. 14. Shir ; The Canticle of the Soul. MS. Vatican. 15. Hammispar; Arithmetic. MS. Bodl, et alibi. 16. Ahechad; Unity. MS. Bodl. and Oppenheim, ^c. 17. Reshith Chochmah ; The Beginning of Wisdom. 18. Sepher 01am; The Book of the World. MS. Oppenheim and Leyd. 19. An astronomical work on Intercala- tions, and two other astronomical works. ABE ABE 20. A poem on Chess, published by Hyde at Oxford, 1696, &c. 21. Several hymns and poems ; some prmted, some MS. (See De Rossi, Wolf, &c. See also a very full list of his works in Ersch and Grueber's Encyclopadie, sub voce.) ABEN-MELEC, a Jewish commen- tator on the Bible, who lived in the seventeenth centmy. ABEN-PACE, a native of Cordova, who died at Fez, a.d. 1138. As a writer on metaphysics, morals and theology, he liad scarcely an equal for his age. ABEN-RAGEL, (Ali,) an astrologer of Cordova, in the eleventh century. One of his works on the occult science was translated into Latin under the title, De Judiciis seu Fatis Stellarum. Ven. 1485. ABEN-ZOHAR, a celebrated physi- cian of Andalusia, a Jew by religion ; Avrote much on his art. His pupil, Aven-oes, mentions him with the deepest respect, assuring us that he carried the knowledge of medicine as far as mental powers coidd caiTy it. By Yussef ben Taxfin, emperor of the Almoravides, (see the name,) he was enriched. His work on Diseases and their Remedies has been often printed in the Latin ti'anslation ; so also have two smaller medical tracts. A son of this doctor, of the same name and profession, who died before the father, was also distinguished in his day. (See Wolf. Bibl. Hebr.) ABERCROMBIE, (John, d. 1805,) a Scotchman, who passed most of his life in London, wrote much on gardening, and was much patronized by royalty. His works, published jointly in his name and that of Mr. Mawe, have been useful in their day and highly popular. ABERCROMBY, (Patrick, 1656— 1716,) a Scottish physician and historian of little merit. • ABERCROMBY, (Sir Ralph, 1738— 1801,) one of our ablest generals, was a native of Tillibodie in Clackmannan. In 1756 he entered the army, and rose through the several gradations to the rank of major-general, which he obtained in 1787. In 1793, he served in the campaign of Flanders, under the duke of York, and distinguished himself at Dunkerque, Chateau Cambresis, and Valenciennes. In this and the fol- lowing campaigns he was noted alike for his courage aTld his maintenance of discipline. In 1795, being appointed commander-in-chief in the West Indies, he reduced Grenada, St. Lucia, St. Vin- cent, Trinidad, with the settlements of Demerara and Essequibo. Promoted to 50 the rank of lieutenant-general, he re- turned to England, was made governor of the Isle of Wight, next transferred to forts Augustus and St. George, and soon to the chief command of the troops in Ireland. In this last office he is said to have been popular : with the natives, because he was a good disciplinarian, and kept an unruly soldiery in compara- tive subordination ; with the English party, because he was a steadfast up holder of the dominant interest. In Scotland, and in the same capacity, he gave equal satisfaction ; and so well was his reputation established, that when in 1800 he was appointed to the command of the expedition destined to contend against the French in Egypt, the public voice sanctioned the nomination. His voyage, disembarkation, and triumph over the French at Aboukir, in March 1801, are matters of history, and glorious for the military fame of England. The pension granted to his family — the peer- age with which his widow was invested, with remainder to her issue male, and the noble monument in St. Paul's, were well merited proofs of the popular gratitude. It would be an injustice to this most dis- tinguished commander, to omit the beau- tiful eulogium upon him contained in the despatches of Lord Hutchinson, who svicceeded him in the command of the troops : — " We have sustained an irre- parable loss in the person of our never- to-be -sufficiently-lamented commander in chief. Sir R. Abercromby, who was mortally wounded in action on the 21st, and died on the 28th of March, 1801. He was wounded early, but he concealed his situation from those about him ; and continued giving his orders with that clearness and perspicuity which had ever marked his character, till long after the action was over, when he fainted through weakness and loss of blood. Were it permitted for a soldier to regret any one who has fallen in the service of his country, we might be excused in lament- ing him ; but it is some consolation to those who tenderly loved him, that as his life was honourable, so was his death glorious. His memory will be recorded in the annals of his country, will be sacred to every British soldier, and em- balmed in the recollection of a grateful posterity." Baron Dumferline, the late speaker of the House of Commons, is a younger son of Sir Ralph. ABERCROMBY, (Sir John R. 1774— 1817,) a Ueutenant-general who saw much service in India. ABE ABE ABERCROMBY, (Christopher,) a Scotch Jesuit. Procurator of the society at Paris, June 18, 1686. In 1691, he was associated with F. James Forhes, rector of the college of Douay. ABERCROMBY, (David,) a Scottish Jesuit, probahly a missionary in Scot- land, about 1680. ABERCROMBY, (Robert,) a Scotch- man of the same order, born a.d. 1533 ; after the failm-e of the embassy of Gau- danus, he left his native country with F. James Hay, and laboured abi'oad for twenty-three years in training novices for the society. Having spent nineteen years in the Scottish mission, he died at Braunsberg, April 27, 1613. ABERCROMBY, (Thomas,) a Scotch- man and a Jesuit ; having served in the English mission, he visited Scotland in June, 1610; but fearful of persecution, retired again into England, and died there, Feb. 4, 1644. ABERNETHY, (Thomas,) a Scottish Jesuit ; visited Rome in 1633. Was, in 1636, a missionary in Scotland, and at- tached to the family of the marquess of Huntley. ABERNETHY, (John, 1680—1740,) a dissenting minister, first of Antrim, next of Dublin, who wrote on the divine attributes, some sermons, tracts, a diary, &c. A good, but in some respects a mistaken man, he lived not without esteem even by those of a diiferent per- suasion. But he was a firm sectarian, and too fond of controversy for the culti- vation of that christian charity which is the brightest ornament of the profession. ABERNETHY, (John, 1763—1831,) an eminent surgeon. His birth-place is doubtfiU ; being either the town of Aber- nethy, in Scotland, or that of Derry, in Ireland. He was removed at an early age to London, and was educated at a day-school in Lothbury. At the age of sixteen he was apprenticed to Mr. (after- wards Sir Charles) Blick, then surgeon to St. Bartholomew's hospital. His fond- ness for his profession was soon exhibited in the ardour with which he applied himself to the pursuit of information ; and on the expiration of his apprentice- ship, at the age of twenty-two, he was deemed competent to perform the duties of assistant-sm-geon to the hospital, and was accordingly appointed to this office, which was rendered vacant by the retire- ment of Mr. Pott. Sliortly afterwards he was likewise elevated, in the room of the same gentleman, to the chair of sm-gery and anatomy. Abernethy now 51 had ample means of distinguishing him- self, which he very soon did, both as a teacher and an author. At the death of Sir C. Blick he succeeded as surgeon to St. Bartholomew's hospital. In 1 793 Abernethy began to give to the world his series of physiological and surgical essays, which at once exhibited the originality and genius of their author, as well as the truly philosophical spirit in which he conducted his investigations : in 1797 these essays were combined into an 8vo volume. In 1784 he published Part I. of his Surgical Observations, containing a classification of tumors, with cases to illustrate the history of each species, &c. &c ; and two years subse- quently. Part II. appeared, presenting an account of disorders of the health in general, and of the digestive organs in particular, which accompany local diseases and obstruct their ciu-e. In 1809 he gave to the public his work on the Constitutional Origin and Treatment of Local Diseases, and on Aneurism. A separate volume was hkewise published by him on Diseases resembUng Syphilis, and Injuries of the Head ; as also (in 1814) An Inquiry into the Probability and Rationality of Hunter's Theory of Life, in which he embodied the substance of the first two lectures he delivered be- fore the College of Surgeons as their pro- fessor, and wherein he maintained and illustrated the doctrines of his great master. These labours had now acquired for Abernethy an European reputation ; and at home he was reaping the reward of his labom's in an extensive practice, to which the proceeds from his lectures must have added very considerably. Two years before his death, his health, which had been gradually declining, obliged him to desist from lecturing, and shortly after- wards to quit practice : he accordingly retired to his country-seat at Enfield, Avhere he expired on Wednesday, April 20th, 1831. His disease was asthma (comphcated probably with diseased heart, although he attiibuted much to the stomach), and consequent dropsj% His body was not examined, in accord- ance, as it is undei'stood, with his own request. The period at which Abernethy came forward into public Jjfe, was one weU adapted to his energetic talents and original mind : the impulse had been already given to more accurate ana- tomical and pathological' research for the advancement of surgery and physiology, by his immediate predecessors ; and the E2 ABE ABE industry and enthusiasm of such men as the subject of this memoir, and others (of whom some are likewise gone, and some are still living), was alone required to carry out the great principles which the previous labours of Haller and J. Hunter in particular had so largely contributed in establishing, and to disperse com- pletely the cloud of empyricism which still overshadowed the science of sur- gery. It were, perhaps, attributing too much to Abernethy, to say that he was the first to apply a knowledge of the functions of organs to the more just and accurate treatment of diseases, especially such as fall to the share of the surgeon ; in this respect he was following in Hunter's footsteps : but to deny to him the merit of great originahty of conception, and a truly philosophical spirit in luifolchng and applying these principles, would be unjust. It would, in truth, be difficult to find a better illustration of the value of his doctrine concerning the " consti- tutional origin and treatment of local diseases," than in its practical recog- nition by, we may venture to say, every well-educated surgeon of the present day. Our very familiarity with it, in fact, renders more difficult a due appreciation of the originality of the mind that first broached many of the principles it in- volves. It was thus the profession was taught to give a due value to the important part which the constitution plays in influ- encing and determining local disorders ; and to regard the latter as so many indices of the deranged state of the former ; and thus it was that the simple art of healing by local treatment was converted into the science of restoring a healthy condition by discovering and remedying the real source of the mis- chief. This, however, was not all : a further principle which Abernethy sovight to establish was more peculiarly his own ; viz, a reference of the greatest portion of these disordered conditions, whether local or general, to derangement of some part of the assimilating apparatus, particularly the stomach and bowels ; a doctrine fraught with the deepest interest to him who seeks scientifically to understand and practise his profession. Yet even this independent thinker has been cri- ticised for having, in the opinion of many, attempted a too comprehensive and indiscriminate reference of disease or disordered functions to this cause ; and vast as unquestionably is the benefit which we of the present generation are deriving from the lessons he inculcated, S>2 it cannot be denied that much mischief has resulted from a misjudged employ- ment of his means of treatment. It may seem unjust to lay thus to Abernethy 's charge the mischief arising from the mal-practice of others ; nor should we perhaps have felt this remark called for, had he not himself so directly encou- raged the abuse of that knowledge, which, if properly and scientifically applied, is so valuable in its results: and one can scarcely regard as otherwise than para- doxical, the fact, that a man of such sound common sense, and so acutely alive to the prejudices and ignorance of the public in all that relates to medicine, should have indiscriminately recommend- ed the perusal of his work, which so few out of the profession could appreciate or beneficially avail themselves of. Indeed this consideration in some sort explains the abuse occasionally lavished upon its author by those whose ignorance of such matters renders them incompetent judges of the utility of the principles involved : the error was mutual — on the Doctor's part in recommending "his book," and on the part of the patient in condemning opinions and advice which it was not to be expected that he would know how to appreciate. As a surgeon, Abernethy was sur- passed by none of his contemporaries. Hunter had previously proposed and practised the appHcation of ligatiu'e on the femoral artery, for the cure of popli- teal aneurism ; and this principle was further and successfiilly extended by Abernethy to the external iliac and carotid arteries, in the treatment of the same dis- ease in some of their offsets. But far be it from those who honour his memory to rest his reputation on the mere dexterity with which he executed the mechanical part of his profession ; let them rather admire the bold yet philosophical spirit with which such apparently desperate operations were planned ; and reflect with pleasure on the opinions regarding operations generally, which this great surgeon held in common with John Hunter, " that they were a reflection on the healing art ; and that the habitual operator was as a savage in anns, who performs by violence what a civilized person would accomplish by stratagem." His simple and impressive style of lec- turing never failed to chain the attention of his audience ; while a certain degree of dogmatism and contempt of those who differed from him, had too much the effect of rendering his hearers any thing ABG ABN but huirible-minded in their judgment of others. In his writings, as in his lectures, his style is clear, simple, and concise. The eccentricity of Abernethy's man- ners on many occasions is well known. Whether this characteristic trait were originally natural, or (as we strongly suspect, in his as in many analogous instances) the result of a habit which was rather encouraged than corrected, certain it is that it was one of his greatest failings ; and without giving credit to the many exaggerated and disgusting anecdotes of coarseness attributed to him, it cannot be questioned that there was foundation enough to establish for him a character in this respect which merits considerable condemnation. The sub- ject of that work, which had acquired for him his highest reputation with the public, natiu-ally drew to him a class of patients (dyspeptics and hypochondriacs) who rendered themselves most obnoxious to his rough treatment ; and it is strange that he shoidd have failed to recognise the importance of employing a know- ledge of the reciprocal influence and mutual re-action of mind and body (with which no one could be better acquamted than himself) as a remedial agent of no trifling value. It ought to be added, that in private and domestic life he was a man of highly amiable disposition ; and in spite of his uncouth manners, fidl of kindness, generosity, and benevolence. ABGAR, an emissary from Michael of Sebastia, pontiff" of Armenia, to Rome, in order to settle some religious disputest This occurred about the middle of the sixteenth century. He appears, if the accounts of Roman Catholics may be credited upon this point, to have per- formed the duties assigned to him with diligence and ability. (Audall's transl. of Chamich's Hist, of Armenia, ii. 336.) ABGARUS. Of this name were se- veral kings in Mesopotamia. Two only deserve commemoration. The first, an unwilling vassal of the Romans, (a. c. 57,) led Crassus and his army into the hands of the Parthians. The second is said by Eusebius to have communicated by letter with our Saviour. But this correspond- ence will not stand the test of criticism. ABICHT, (I. G. 1672—1740,) a Ger- man theologian and orientalist, wrote much and largely on subjects of biblical literature. A list of his works is given in the Unpartheyische Kirchenhist (torn, iii. p. 327.5). The most remarkable are Select.i Rabbino-Philologica, and some treatises on Hebrew accents, &c. 53 ABILDGARD,(P.C.d.l808,)aDamsh naturalist of some note in his own coun- try, but little known beyond its confines. A brother of the above was an histori- cal painter. ABIOSI, an Italian physician and an astrologer of the fifteenth centm-y. ABLAVIUS, prsetorian prefect under Constantine the Great, was murdered by order of Constans. ABLE, (Thomas,) an English divine in the reign of Henry VIII., who had the courage to write against the divorce of that monarch from queen Catherine. This conduct, united with his denial of the king's supremacy in matters eccle- siastical, led to his execution at Smith- field in 154a. ABLESON, (John, 1664,) a British seaman, slain in his country's cause. Like the majority of those early mariners who have manifested conduct and cou- rage in fight, and who have attained celebrity only with the loss of life, no trace remains either of his lineal descent or professional novitiate. But for the circumstances of his death, his name would probably have been consigned to oblivion. He fell in the hour of victory, commanding the Gui?iea, a small fourth- rate,* which took a prominent part in the bloody and memorable battle in which James Duke of York defeated the imfor- tunate Dutch admiral Opdam. In this achievement, which won for the royal duke such naval renown, Ableson dis- played ability and courage of the highest order. The battle was fought on the 3d of June, 1665 ; for the details of which, vide memoir of James Duke of York. ABNER, a Jewish rabbi of Vallado- lid, who, on embracing Christianity in 1295, assumed the name of Alfonso of Burgos. He was a sincere convert, and wi"ote zealously in defence of his new faith. He was also tie author of a work on the plague. ABNEY, (Sir Thomas, 1639—1722,) deserves favourable mention for his care of Dr. Watts during so many years of bodily suffering. He received him into his house when incapacitated for public exertion ; and after the death of Sir Thomas, his wife continued the same kindness. He was an excellent London magistrate (a native of Derbyshire) a zealous member of parliament for that city, and a truly religious man. • The old authorities are all in error when they denominate this ship "a small frigate of eisht and thirty guns." In those days frigates of this force were unknown. ABO A BR ABOAB, (Immanuel, d. 1629,) a Span- ish Jew of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Wrote Nomologia, or Dis- ciirsos Legales, a Defence of the Oral Law ; published (at Amsterdam ?) after his death. ABOAB, (Isaac,) a Castilian Jew. Driven from Spain in 1492, he died in Portugal the next year. His works are — ■ 1. A Commentary on the Pentateuch. Ven. 1548; Cracow, 1587; Wihnandorf, 1713. It contains many things against Christianity. 2. Meroroth Hammeor : The Lamp of Light ; a work of morality, often printed in the original, in Spanish, and in German. ABOAB, (Isaac, 1609—1693,) a Por- tuguese Jew of learning. He was em- ployed at Amsterdam and in the Brazils, and wrote some commentaries. See also Delitzsch's Geschichte der Judisclien Poesie, where this man, and Jacob Aboab (fl. 1 700) are both mentioned as Hebrew poets. ABOS. Two brothers of this name, both knights of Malta in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, distinguished themselves greatly by the defence of Malta against the Turks, and by hostili- ties against that power in various parts of the Mediterranean. With one vessel only, Maximilian d'Abos had the cou- rage to assail five of the enemy. A tem- pest casting him on the coast of Tunis, he was sent a prisoner to Constantinople, and put to death by order of the sultan because he would not change his religion. ABOVILLE (F. M. Count de, 1730— 1817,) a French general, who saw much service in Evuope, and in America during the war of independence. If he was a good officer, he was a notorious time- server; he fought, and as a member of the legislature, voted, for every govern- ment which ai-ose. ABRAAMES, (Saint, d. 422,) bishop of Carres in Mesopotamia. ABRAAMIUS, (Saint,) bishop of Ar- bela, suffered martyrdom in the persecu- tion of Sapor king of Persia, a.d. 348. ABRABANEL, or ABARBANEL, (1437—1508.) This celebrated Jewish author was a native of Lisbon, and de- scended from an ancestry of much renown among the Jews, although his direct descent from king David has been shown by De Rossi (p. 20), and Wolf (i. 658), to be tolerably apocryphal ! Being of an ambitious turn of mind, he paid great attention to politics and finance ; and for many years Alfonso V. honoured him with high official appointments, and with 54 a seat among his councillors. In 1482, on the death of Alfonso, his successor John II. drove his father's favourites and the Jews from his presence, and Abrabanel sought an asylum in Castile. He here turned again to the studies of his youth, and partly composed his com- mentary on Joshua, &c. But he was still unreclaimed from the restlessness of an ambitious spirit ; and though he had be- gun his commentary on the book of Kings, he forsook the kings of Israel for the ser- vice of a modem court, namely that of Ferdinand of Arragon, in which he was just as well rewarded as he had been in Portugal. It has, indeed, sometimes been insinuated that his attention to matters of finance was not quite free from a trait of dishonesty, but the writer of this ar- ticle does not know whether there is any valid evidence to rest such a charge upon. In 1492, Ferdinand banished the Jews from his dominions; and though Abrabanel exerted all his influence to avert this blow against himself and his fellow-sufferers, all his efforts were in- effectual. On finding that he was im- successfid, he embarked with his family for Naples in the year 1493. Here again he became a candidate for court favovu*, and he was fortunate enough to obtain the patronage of Ferdinand and of his suc- cessor Alfonso. When, however, Charles VIII. of France invaded Naples, he fled with Alfonso to Messina, and after the death of his patron retired to Corsica, a re- sidence which he again exchanged in 1496 for Monopoli, in Apulia. He there wrote the chief part of his works, attributing to his worldly difficulties both the inclination and the leisure for studies, which he had never been able to pursue, when im- mersed in political affairs and enjoying all the luxuries of a high station. (See the passage in which he speaks of this, quoted in Wagenseil, Tela Ignea Satanse, p. 75). From Monopoli he went to Ve- nice, in order to make some arrange- ments between that state and the court of Portugal ; there he died in 1508, and was magnificently interred in Padua. His chief works are — 1 . His Commentary on the Pentateuch : this, notwithstanding the erroneous date of 1466 contained in it, as the year of its composition, was in all probability written in 1496 at Mono- poli. It was printed in 1579 at Venice, 1728 at Hanover, and 1786 at Amster- dam. The Commentary on Deuteronomy called Marcheveth Hammishnah, The Second Chariot, was printed separately at Sabioneta (a very rare edition, which ABR ABR contains many attacks on Christianity suppressed in other editions). 2. Com- mentary on the Former Prophets (i. e. Joshua, &c.), often reprinted. 3. Com- mentary on the Later Prophets (Isaiah, &c.) 4. Commentary on Daniel, called The Fountains of Salvation, 1551, and at Amsterdam, 1647. 5. Mashmiah Jesh- iiah. The Herald of Salvation: Thessa- lonica 1526, Amsterdam 1644, Offenbach 1767. This is a most bitter attack on the christian interpretation of the prophecies, and was published in 1711 in Latin, by Mains at Frankfort-on-the-Maine. 6. Rosh Hamanah, The Summary of Faith; Constantinople, 1505 ; and in Latin by Vorstius, Amsterdam, 1638. 7. Zevach Pesach, The Passover Sacrifice ; Con- stantinople, 1505. 8. Nachaloth Aboth, The Inheritance of the Fathers ; a com- mentary on the Pirke Avoth, 1505. 9. Hatereth Zekenim, Tlie Crown of the Aged; Sabioneta, 1557. 10. Miphaloth Elohim, The Works of God. 11. Tzu- roth Hajesodoth, Forms of Foundations : printed with No. 9. 12. Teshuvoth, or Answers. 13. Jeshuah Meshicho, The Salvation of his Messiah : MS. in the library at Paris. 14. Lahakath Han- neviim. The Congregation of Prophets : MS. 15. Jomoth 01am, The Days of the World; or Chronicles : MS. 16. Tzedek Olamim, The Justice of the Worlds (i. e, this woi'ld and the next). 17. Shamaim Chadashim, New Heavens. Abrabanel is highly esteemed as a commentator, for the fulness with which he quotes preceding authors, and the judgment and acuteness he displays in discussing their opinions. He is bitter beyond conception against the Christians and Christianity ; but De Rossi- remarks, that although he was ill-treated by two christian sovereigns, yet he found fa- vour with another, and both he and his people were received with the utmost humanity in the dominions of the pope. That pope was, however, Alexander VI. ! Bartolocci (Bibliotheca Rabbini- ca, iii. 874, et seq.) says of him, that he was a "^ man of acute but most perverted mind, indefatigable in study, patient in fasting, and able often to de- vote the whole night to study, and so rapid in composition that he could com- ment upon and publish a book of scrip- ture within a few days." He adds, that his blasphemies against Christianity, the pope, the cardinals, bishops, &c. deface every page of his pestilent works. This judgment is, perhaps, too harsh ; there is much ground for censure on this head, 55 but still there is much of his works which is valuable. His commentary on Plosea was translated into Latin by Francis Van Husen, and published at Leyden, 1687. Buxtorf has published some scraps of Abrabanel in Latin, and also Lud. Com- piegne du Veil has translated the preface to Leviticus, and published it with Mai- monides De Sacrificiis ; Sprecher trans- lated his Nahum and Habakkuk, &c. A list of the parts of his works translated may be found in Wolf. Bibl. Hebr. i. p.629, et seq. (De Rossi, Wolf, Bartolocci, &c.) ABRABANEL, JUDAH, son of the above, (fl. early in the sixteenth century,) called the " Hebrew Lion," &c. He was a physician and philosopher of repute among the Jews, and -wi-ote a work called Three Dialogues concerning Love ; which was translated into Italian (Dialoghi di Amore di Leone Hebreo Medico. Venet. 1558 ; an earlier one at Rome, by Aldus, 1535, &c.), Spanish (two translations), Latin and French (two translations, one by Sauvage). The Latin, by Saracenus, is to be found in Pistorius Scriptor. Artis Cabalisticae. The others are very rare. He was probably the Leo, author of the MS. tragic tale Drusilla, mentioned by Tiraboschi, vii. 1319. ABRADATES, king of Susiana, and a vassal of Assyria, joined Cynis the Great, and was slain in battle with the Egpytians. ABRAHAH, prince of Yemen, of whom strange legends are told by the Mohammedans. As he was nominally at least a Christian, he disliked the pil- grimages to the Caaba, or square house of Mecca; and near to that place he built a church which he magnificently adorned. In revenge, the idolatrous priests desecrated his new place of worship. To chastise them, he assembled an army and marched towards Mecca ; but God, says the koran, fought for the holy house, the infidel prince was compelled to retreat, and on his return was destroyed mira- culously. This retreat has given rise to an era, — that of the Elephant, the first year of which corresponds to a.d. 571. Mahomet, to enhance the sanctity of Mecca, would have adopted legends much more puerile than those relating to this Arabian. See Maracci Refutationes in Alcoranum, p. 824 ; and Prodromus in Refutationes, &c. ABRAHAM, (Saint,) an anchoret of Mesopotamia, in the fourth century, whose freaks might provoke the amuse- ment, did they not also command the pity of the Christian. This madman took ABR ABR a wife, left her the veiy day of his nup- tials, and plunged into the wilderness " to serve God." There he remained fifty years. On the death of his brother, Mary, his niece, was confided to his cai-e, and he brought her up in his cave. But with all his vigilance, he could not pre- vent her seduction by an ecclesiastic, nor her flight to a distant city, where she lived in deplorable depravity. Whatever might be the absurd asceticism of Abra- ham, he had right feeling enough to re- claim a lost niece to virtue. He soiight her out, and conducted her back to the desert, where she lived fifteen years longer. This event, which we have on the authority of the great Syrian doctor, St. Ephrem, who knew them both, has given rise to a notable drama by Roswitha, nun of Gendersheim. (See the name.) ABRAHAM BEN R. CHIGA, a Spanish rabbi, who flourished in the ele- venth and twelfth centuries. Wrote on the resurrection, on the appearance of the Messiah, on astronomy, on music, goemetry, &c. Of his astronomical works one was published at Basil in 1546. Like all the scientific men of the middle ages, he was a firm believer in astrology. ABRAHAM, a Portuguese Jew in the sixteenth century, was joined with Athias in the Spanish translation of the Bible. It is said to be a faithfid version ; it is certainly more literal in appearance than any we have consulted. ABRAHAM A SANCTA CLARA, (1642 — 1709,) the assumed name of a Roman Catholic preacher of Vienna. His real name was Ulrich Megerle ; and al- though it is usually said that he was more of a buffoon than a theologian, his popu- larity and reputation were so great au to entitle him to notice here. Indeed Dr. Wolff, (Cyclopadie der Deutschen Na- tional Literatur,) complains extremely of the injustice done to his memory by this character of him, which, however, seems not to be altogether an unfounded one. He was born at Krahenstetten, not far from Mbskirch, in Suabia, and educated at the latter place, Ingoldstadt, and Salz- burg. At eighteen he entered into the order of Barefooted Dominicans, and pursued his studies in one of their mo- nasteries at Vienna. He was, after a while, sent to the monastery of Taxa, near Dachan, in Bavaria, as a preacher, and returned soon after to Vienna in the same capacity. After an employment of the same kind at Gratz, he was called to Vienna in 1669, by Leopold I., as Preacher to the Imperial Court; which 56 office he held for more than twenty years, and after enjoying the highest dignities of his ordei-, which he laboured to reform, he died in 1709. He preached in 1689 often at Rome, to the great satisfaction of his audience, and he received from Inno- cent XI. a token of his approbation. He was throughout his life a zealous, indeed a bigoted Roman Catholic. Dr. Wolff, who defends and admires him, acknowledges that we must measure his productions by a different standard from that which we shoidd apply to ser- mons in the present day. He attributes to him the excellencies of warmth and zeal for religion and virtue, great knowledge of human nature, great powers of lan- guage (although German was then in a cmde condition), a rich and vigorous imagination, great graphic power, strik- ing wit, and cutting satire ; but acknow- ledges that these are tarnished by want of taste, an effort after effect and anti- thesis, extravagance, and a style often entirely beneath the dignity of his sub- ject and positively low. His learning was considerable ; he was as free in lashing the vices of the great as the poor ; he spared no one ; and his boldness, combined with his powers of amusement and wit, created for him a popidarity of the highest order. His ha- tred, too, of all but Roman Catholics, may not have been against him in ob- taining such popularity. His most remarkable works are — 1. Judas the Arch-scoimdrel (Judas der Erz-schelm). 2. Up! up! Christians! (AuflT! auff"! ihr Christen!). 3. Some- thing for Everybody (Etwas fiir Alle). 4. You must die (Du musst sterben). 5. Fie on the world! (Huy und pfuy der welt.) The writer of this article does not pre- tend to be deeply read in Abraham a Sancta Clara's works, but he thinks from what he has seen, that the above charac- ter is too favourable. There is much familiarity of language, a sort of provin- cial dialect, and a great deal of buffoonery. The very title of some of his works is an argument of this latter quality. What shall one say to a work entitled Gack, Gack, Gack, Gack, a Ga (or Gack, Gack, Gack, Gack, ein Ey) : i. e. Cluck, Cluck, Cluck, Cluck, an Egg ! There is a just character of this author given in the Encyclopadie of Ersch and Grliber, sub voce ; and it is there stated that Schiller, in his Wallenstein's Lager, has made up the priest's addresses out of scraps of Abraham a Sancta Clara. I ABR ABR ^WolfF, Cyclopadie. Conversations Lexi- con. Ersch and Grueber.) ABRAHAM II. and ABRAHAM III. Two pontiffs of Armenia in the beginning of the last century. The second of them was a native of Crete, and bishop of Tha- kirtagh ; and on the death of the former, in 1 734, was so popular among the clergy that he was unanimously elected, and held the pontificate three years. He was called upon by Thamaz Kouli Khan (otherwise called Nadir Shah), to bless his sword on the plains of Meeghan, which, having done, he returned in peace. (Audall's Armenia.) ABRAHAM BEN CHANANIA JAGEL, a converted Jew, who held (under the name of Camillo Jaghel) the office of censor of Hebrew books at An- cona in 1619, 1620. While a Jew he \\Tote — 1. LekachTov; Good Doctrine. (Prov. iv. 2.) Ven. 1595 ; Amst. 1658. It is translated into Latin by C. de Veil. London, 1679 ; and by Carpzov, Pref. to Raymund Martin's Pugio Fidei ; and into German also. 2. Asheth Chail : The Strong Woman. Ven. 1606, &c. ABRAHAM BEN ASHER, a rabbi of Japhet, in Upper Galilee. Wrote Or Hashechel : The Light of the Under- standing ; a Commentary on the Mid- rash Rabba. The part on Genesis was printed with text. Ven. 1561. ABRAHAM BEN DAVID, or BEN DIOR, the Levite. There are two Jewish authors thus named: — 1. Abraham Ben David the Elder, (d. 1180,) a native of Toledo. His chief work was, the Sepher Hakabbalah ; or, the Book of Tradition : a work of great celebrity, containing a history of the doctrines of the Jews, as handed Aovm. by uninterrupted tradition from Adam him- self (!) to rabbi J. Meir, who died 1141. It is written to confute the Karaites. It has been published several times : — at Mantua, 1513 (Heb. ; also a part of it in Latin at the end of Genebrard's Chronographia. Paris, 1600) ; Basle, 1580 ; Amst. 1711. He wi-ote also, Amana Rama ; or. Lofty Faith, (MS, Vatican and Turin) ; and some astro- nomical books. (See M'Caul's Kimchi, where the Seph. Hakabb. is often quoted.) 2. Abraham Beji David the Younger, (d. 1198), a native of Peschera, in Cas- tile. He was one of the most learned Jews of his time, and vfxoie commentaries on the Jad Hachazakah of Maimonides, on the Siphra, on the Jetzirah ; a ritual, entitled Baale Hannephesh ; or Animated Beings, &c. (De Rossi. Wolf.) 57 ABRAHAM, called Horwitz, authot of three works: — 1. Berith Abraham: the Covenant of Abraham. Cracow, 1602. 2. Jesh Nochelin : There are Heirs. Published by his son at Prague, 1615. 3. Amek Barakah : The Vale of Blessing. Cracow, 1597. ABRAHAM BAR CHASDAI, chief rabbi of Barcelona, and a contemporary of Kimchi, and therefore about the end of the twelfth centiuy. He translated from the Arabic, The Apple, and the Mozene Zedek : The Scales of Righteous- ness. (MS.) The Ben Hamelek ve Hannazir : The King's Son and the Nazarene ; a dialogue occasionally re- printed. The edition of Constantinople, 1518, is very rare. — See more in De Rossi. ABRAHAM BEN DAVID, (of Os- tra,) wrote The Golden Chain. Hanover and Frankfort. 1681. ABRAHAM, son of Judah, of Bar- celona, a rabbi of the thirteenth century, WTOte the Arba Turim : the Fom* Orders. ABRAHAM, son of Judah, a chazan or chaunter of the congi'egation, wrote a book, entitled Chibbm-e Leket : Collec- tions — i. e. from Aben Ezra, and other rabbis. ABRAHAM, called Gher, or Pro- selyte, of Cordova. This man was an apostate from Christianity to Judaism, about the beginning of the seventeenth century, and is the same person of whom Barios speaks, in his History of Spanish poets, as Abrahamo Pellegrino. He wrote a work, called the Fortress of Judaism, against Christianity, &c. (De Rossi.) ABRAHAM BEN SABATAI CO- HEN, (b. 1670,) a Hebrew poet, who paraphrased the Psalms in his youth, and published his paraphrase at Venice in 1719. (Deiitzsch. Geschichte der Jii- dischen Poesie.) ABRAHAM BEN SAMUEL ZA- CUT, (fl. 1490,) a Je\vish professor of astronomy, &c. driven out from Spain in 1492 by Ferdinand's edict. He went to Portugal, and became astronomer and chronogi-apher to king Emmanuel. He wrote — 1. Juchasin. Constant. 1566; Cra- cow, 1580. This is an history of the transmission of the Jewish doctrines, with accounts of the kings, high priests, &c. The title is taken from an older treatise, the loss of which is deplored in the Tal- mud. Cod. Pesachim. ch. v. f. 62. 2. Some Astronomical Books and an Alma- nack, in opposition to which that of Alfonso of Cordova was published. 3. ABR ABR MatlioTc Lenepliesli : Sweet to the Soiil (Prov. xvi. 24) ; a theological and moral AIBRAHAMSEN, (Isaac, 16G3 — 1714,) a native of Flushing; is author of a chronological work, in itself of no merit, but valuable as containing some points of Flemish ecclesiastical history not else- where to be foimd. ABRAHAMSON, (Peter,) a Swedish jurisconsult of the last centur}^ ABRAM, (Nicholas, 1589—1655,) a Jesuit ecclesiastic of LoiTaine ; was a man of considerable learning, and of great modesty, but he had no logic, and he was so diffiise as to be wearisome. His com- mentaries on the Orations of Cicero, and on Virgil, have been very useful to suc- ceeding editors. To his theological works little praise can be assigned. ABRANCHES, (Alvaro d',) a Portu- guese general, w^ho contributed much to the restoration of Joam IV. in 1640. ABRANTES, (Jose de Sa Almeida e Menezes, Marquis of) one of the many public men of Portugal, who proved trai- tors to their country during the lasm-pa- tion of Bonaparte. Born in 1782, of a very noble family, he was in all the vigour of manhood when Junot invaded that countiy. Though his father had been nominated by the prince-regent president of the government during the absence of the court in Brazil, he imme- diately joined the invaders, and became Junot's messenger to Bonaparte, at Bay- onne, to procure the crown of Portugal for that weak yet ambitious man. He was, however, detained by the emperor in Paris, until the events of 1814 enabled him to revisit Lisbon. To Joam VI. he applied for a dukedom, and failing in the application, he opposed the government, joined Don Miguel, and was exiled for the rest of his life which he closed in 1826. ABRESCH, (Frederic Louis,) was born at Hamburgh, Dec. 29, 1699, where his father was the chief civil officer. At the age of 13, he was sent to learn French with some refugees settled near Greifenstein, where he made so rapid a progress as to be able in seven months to speak it as well as his native tongue. Destined by his father for the church, he applied himself to Latin, Greek, and He- brew, at the college of Herborn. In 1720, he went to Utrecht; where the lectures of Duker and Drakenborch gave him a decided turn for classical literature, and led him to abandon his intended pro- fession. In 1723, he was appointed vice- 58 rector of the college of Middleburgh, and two years afterwards he was promoted to the office of rector. From thence he removed to Zwolle, in 1741, where he filled a simdar situation till his death in 1782, at the advanced age of 82. He was a considerable and constant contri- butor to the ' Observationes Miscellanese,' which appeared at Amsterdam in 1735, under the editorship of J. P. Doi-ville, and Peter Burmann. Of his articles, some are signed with his real name, others are anonymous, or else under the signature of H., or H. L., or P. B. A. A. H., and some he subscribed with the name of Petro-Basilius. They relate to Aristides, jEschylus, Herodotus, Hesychius, and the two Xenophons of Athens and Ephesus, together with some on the New Testa- ment. Living at a time when Hemster- huis, whom he hailed as the restorer of Greek literatiu'e in Holland, was asto- nishing his contemporaries with the extent of his researches, Abresch caught the fever of the day, and wandered through the whole range of Greek reading, with the exception of the Neo-Platonists and the Commentators on Aristotle ; and as he was particularly conversant with the tri- umvirate of the Greek fathers — Gregory, Basil, and Chiysostom — he was enabled to supply a great many words omitted in Stephens's Greek Thesaurus. From the courteous language adopted towards dif- ferent scholars, it is evident that he was a total stranger to those angry feelings, which have brought no little discredit on criticism. Even De-Pauw, whom almost eveiy editor of ^schylus has abused or despised, is spoken of as ' Aar doctissimus.' Of his learned labours those on Hesy- chius are the most valuable, as he was the first to refer the glosses in that lexi- con to their proper places in Herodotus and Thucydides, and the remains of the Attic stage. "Anxious to act," says he, "the part of a grammarian, I have chosen rather to defend passages from alteration than to indulge in conjectures; which I have found to be the resource of persons either ignorant of the gramma- tical constiniction, or imwilling to un- dergo the trouble of thinking about it." Despite, however, the sneer at emenda- tor}' critics, he occasionally indulged in guesses himself; but he was seldom suc- cessful ; and even when he was more than usually acute, the credit of his con- jectui'es has been given to some other critic, while the mass of the materials which he collected has been of much service to subsequent scholars. It must A BR ABS Be confessed, towever, tliat lie exhibits but little of the high taste of a genuine critic, when he would defend an ex- pression in -iEschylus or Thucydides by appealing to writers, no matter of what age, or how far removed from the period of pure Greek. His publications are — 1. Animadversiones ad iEschylum ; libri duo. Accedunt annotationes ad qusedam loca N. T. Medioburgi, 1743. 2. Aris- taeneti Epistolae ; Lectionum Aristsiiete- anim libri duo. Zwollse, 1749. 3. Dilu- cidationes Thucydideae : quibus passim cum N. T. tum aliorum scriptorum loca illustrantur aut emendantur. Trajecti ad Rhenum, 1755. 4. Philippi Cattieri Ga- zophylacium Grseconim seu Methodus admirabilis ad insignem brevi comparan- dam verbonim copiam. ZwoUse, 1757. 5. Animadversiones ad ^schylum, liber tertius. Accedit Dilucidationum Tliucydi- dearum Auctarium. Zwollae, 1763. In the preface to his edition of Cattier's ■work wUl be found a few notes on his Dilucidationes Thucydideae, communi- cated by an anonymous friend, who was probably Valckenaer, as may be inferred from his notes on Phoen. 1409, andEpistoI. ad Roever. p. 74. In the Miscell. Observ. vi. p. 621, he replies to the objections started by Duker in the preface to his Florus, against the intei-pretation of some passages in that author, proposed by himself in Animadvers. in ^Eschyl. p. 553. ABREU, (Alexis,) a Portuguese phy- sician, who in 1622 published a treatise on the Diseases of Courtiers. ABREU, (Josef Ant. d. 1775,) con- tinued that immense heap of documents, Colleccion de los Tratados de Paz, de Alianza, &c. which Bertolano had com- menced. His work is, however, rather a new one than a continuation of Ber- tolano's. ABREU, (Joam M. 1754—1815,) a Portuguese mathematician ; wrote two works on geometiy, which were pub- lished in France. ABRIAL, (And. J. Count d', 1750— 1828,) an eminent French lawyer and judge, who, however, ^vi'ote nothing. ABRIANI, (Pablo, d. 1699,) a Car- melite friar, once actively employed in preaching, but at length dismissed from his order. He translated a considerable Eortion of Horace and the Pharsalia of lUcan, and composed some poetry of his own. ABRIL, (P. S. 1530—1590,) a native of Alcalas, in the diocese of Toledo, taught the Latin and Greek classics at 59 Saragossa. He was probably one of the first teachers that not only authorized, but prepared, several interlinear versions of the ancient writers, for the use of learners. These versions he made as literal as pos- sible, and his reputation was very high. For this fact it is easy to account. Boys will always like the masters who save them trouble ; mothers will do the same ; and fathers are but too much disposed to judge favourably of their sons' pro- gress, when they perceive all smooth and satisfactory. If there be no royal path to geometry, there is none to lan- guages ; the knowledge which has not been laboriously and even painfully ac- quired, is of no great value. For this reason, though we acknowledge the merits of Abril as a grammarian, we much doubt whether his manner of in- stmction ever made one. For the same reason too we shall give no list of the numerous works translated by this Span- ish Hamilton. ABSALOM, archbishop of Lund, and primate of the north, (1128 — 1191,) had a great voice in Danish affairs under Wal- demar, and Canute VI. At an early age he distinguislied himself by his studies, which he finished at the university of Paris. In 1158 he was elected bishop of Roskild, by the chapter of that cathe- dral, at the instigation of the new king, Waldemar, who had been his fellow- student. As might be expected, he be- came the minister and friend of Uie monarch ; and to his counsels, no less than his value, the nation was indebted for many brilliant exploits. Among the most signal of his expeditions, was the one that he undertook against the Vend pirates of Arkona, in the isle of Rugen. There they were powerful alike for their numbers, their fortifications, and their remarkable valour. Religious fervour was added to habitual courage. The great idol of Swante\at, at the feet of which was laid all the booty taken in war, was held to be a true palladium : so long as it was among them, there was no fear of subjugation. Hence a body of 300 aiTned men, the bravest of the people, were stationed within this holy enclosure ; and its four countenances, all horrible enough, were believed to look favourably on this consecrated band. Absalom as- saulted the city, destroyed the temple, broke the idol into a thousand pieces, but spared the inhabitants on the condition of their embracing Christianity. Over the Jomsberg pirates too, (see Harold, SwEYN,) he is said to have triumphed; ABS ABS and he may possibly have laid the foun- dation of Dantzic, However this be, he caused Denmark to be respected. In 1178, Eskild, Avho had been his personal enemy, resigned the archiepiscopal throne of Lund, and declared that no one was so worthy to succeed him as Absalom. The chapter thought so too, and he was elected. But he had no great desire for the dignity ; by his flock of Roskild he was much beloved ; he had no wish to leave them ; and he refused to remove, on the just plea that he would not resign the one, and that he could not canonically hold the two. His superior, however, Alexander IH., was less scnipulous than he, and insisted that he shoidd hold both. How indeed coidd he be condemned for that which was tolerated in every part of Cliristendom ? Absalom was something better than a warrior ; he was a man of some learning himself, and a great patron of it in others. At his instance two celebrated writers, Sweyn Aggesen, and Saxo Gram- maticus, undertook the national history ; and under his patronage they finished it. He had a great share in the compilation of the legal code which Waldemar pub- lished ; and he drew up the Jus Eccle- siasticmn Selandise, a body of canon law for the use of clergy and laity. To reform his monasteries, especially that of Sore, which he had founded, he brought able monks from Paris. In some other respects he was an enlightened prelate. He abolished the fieiy ordeal in cases of adultery. He placed bounds to the bene- factions of the laity in favour of particular ^churches. Yet with all his merits he was sometimes the subject of complaint among a people half pagans in their hearts. The people of Scania would pay no tithes ; and when the assessors tried to enforce the collection they broke out into open rebellion. Waldemar sent troops to re- duce them, and they were signally de- feated. Well for them that the mischief ended here : the king was preparing to make a terrible example of them, when the archbishop appeared in the field, begged, as the reward of his services, that his flock might be spared ; and his request was granted. — His noble stand for the independence of Denmark is well deserving of record. After the acces- sion of Canute VI. the emperor Frederic Barbarossa sent an ambassador to demand homage and tribute for the provinces which had been conquered from the Vends. Both were refused. Frederic then threatened to give the investiture 60 of those provinces to some other prince. By the advice of Absalom, Canute re- plied : " If the emperor is resolved to give away that which is not and cannot be his, let him first look for a man who may be bold enough to receive it !" Still Frederic, determined to carry his point, sent another embassy, with orders to bring Canute to submission by promises or menaces. " Tell thy master," replied Absalom, " that Denmark is not Thurin- gia ; that before he can dispose of this kingdom, he must conquer it ; that the Danes have steel as well as the Germans; that my sovereign fears not the threats of thine!" To chastise this insxxlt, Frederic engaged Bogislas, duke of Pomerania, to declare war against Denmark. But Absalom had a sword as well as a pen ; he defeated the duke in a naval action, and compelled him to do homage to Canute, instead of Frederic. This ad- vantage was followed by the reduction of Mecklenbm-g, Esthonia, and some minor districts, — exploits in which the arch- bishop had no ordinary share. (Lan- gebek, Scriptores Rerum Danicarum. Stephanius, Notae ad Saxonem Gram.) ABSCHATZ, (Hans Assman von, 1646 — 1699,) a German statesman and poet. He was a native of Worbitz, in Silesia, and educated at Liegnitz, and then studied jurisprudence at Strasburgh and Leyden. After travelling in France and Italy he returned to his native country, and held an official situation at the com"t of Vienna, where he was highly prized by Leopold I. After a life passed with considerable reputation, he had an official situation (Landes Haupt- mann) at Leignitz, which he held till his death. His poetiy is not remarkable for genius or imagination, but it is simple and correct — no trifling merit in the then condition of GeiTnan literature. Some of his hymns and religious songs seem pretty; but probably their merit is not great, as it does not appear that any of them are inserted in Chev. Bunsen's Ver- such Eines Allgemeimen Gesang-imd- Gebet-Buch. He translated the Pastor Fido, and imitated several other Italian Avorks. His poems were published in 1 704 under the title of H. A. von Abschatz Poetische Uebersetzungen imd Gedichte. (Wolff's Cyclopadie.) ABSTEMIUS, (Laurentius.) His Ita- lian name was Astemio. He was bom at Macerata, and became, in the course of time, librarian to Guido Ubaldo, duke of Urbino. He was the author of the fol- lowing works: — 1. Libri duo de quibus- ABS ABU dam locis obscuris. 2. Hecatomythium, sive Centum Fabiilae ex Graeco in Latinum versae. 3. Hecatomythium Secundum. The first appeared at Venice without a date, in 4to, and has been reprinted by Gruter in the Lampas Critica sive Fax Artium, tom. i. p. 878. It contains ex- planations of many passages in the Ibis of 0\dd, which had been previously mis- imderstood, and corrects an errror which Valerius Maximus committed on a point of history. The second work was ap- pended to an edition of Valla's version of thirty fables of jEsop, printed at Venice in 1495, 4to. The third appeared like- wise at Venice in 1499, 4to. The last two were afterwards incoi-porated witli some editions of jEsop printed at Venice, Frank- fort, and elsewhere in 1505, 1519, 1520, 1530, 1580, 1610, and 1660. Of the 200 nearly sixty have been put into elegiac verse by Hieronymus Ossius, in a work vmder the title of Phryx iEsopus habitu poetico Hieronymi Ossii Tyri- getae.' Francofurti ad Maenum, 1584; — a very rare work. Following the ex- ample of Poggio, Abstemius gave a few of his fables an indelicate turn, with the view of ridiculing the clergy of his day ; and hence his Hecatomythia are in- cluded amongst the books prohibited by the Catholic church. So far is he, how- ever, from apologizing for this breach of decorum, that he claims credit for his forbearance. " I have taken," says he, " especial care that the fablea should be rather of a serious than a facetious cast ; and hence I have designedly rejected many ludicrous ideas that presented themselves, as being too broad, and little suited to the gravity of a court." The greater part are merely alterations — fre- quently for the worse — of the ^sopic fables, \n-itten in Greek, Latin, German, French, and Italian ; and which were then current in different countries, where they were perpetuated as the songs of the nursery and children's games are now. The Venice edition of 1499 was reprinted at the same place in 1505 and 1519. It contains a prefatory letter to Angelo Griphone, in which allusion is made to the first Hecatomythium, de- dicated to Octavianus Ubaldinus. The fables are followed by a treatise, De compluribus verbis commvmibus, quae nunc male appellantur Deponentia; in the preface to which he says he had written a life of Epaminondas, which never seems to have been pubhshed. He wrote also a preface to Aurelius Victor, which appeared at Venice in 1505. There 61 is also in the Barberini library at Rom^ a large work of his on geography in MS. ABU BEKIR, the first of the, four khalifs who immediately succeeded Ma- homet. Before his conversion to the faith of Islam he was called Abu Caab ; but after that event he was named Ab- dalla, servant of God, and Abu Bekir, father of the virgin, because his daughter fAyesha, the last and most beloved of the prophet's wives, was the only maiden thus honoured. This chief was one of the earliest and most faithful of Mahomet's adherents ; and that he was something of an impostor, may be inferred from two circumstances. He pretended to have seen the nocturnal departure of the Pro- phet for the realms above ; and after he became khalif he was the first to collect — no doubt to amplify — the scattered chapters of the Koran. He succeeded as the vicar of the prophet in the eleventh year of the Hejira, or the year of Christ 632, being then 61 years of age. His short administration was successful. He subdued the rebels of Arabia, and tri- umphed, through his generals, over the Greek emperor Heraclius. By Moham- medan historians he is particularly men- tioned for the merciful directions which he gave to his generals. " Spare the women, the children, the aged." — " Make not war untQ j'ou have invited the people to embrace the holy law." — " Always respect the character of an ambassador." — " Avoid cruelty." — " Oppose your enemy by open bravery, never by poi- son." — " Spai-e the fruit-tree and the corn-fields." These commands were dic- tated by sound policy ; but this khalif had more than policy to recommend him. In his habits he was distinguished for great humility. He took not from the public treasury more than sufficed for himself, a camel, and a slave ; his fare was exceedingly frugal ; yet, on his death, three drachmas only were found in his possession. Well might his suc- cessor, the khalif Omar, assert, that to imitate him would be a hard task for all future vicars of the prophet. The reader should here observe that by the Shiites, neither Abu Bekir, father-in- law as he was of Mahomet, nor the three successors of Abu Bekir, were the legi- timate vicars of the prophet of God. The right lay with Ali, cousin and son-in-law of Mahomet. .\BU HANIFA EL NOMAN BEN THABET, chief of one among the four great orthodox sects of Islam j was born ABU ABU at Cusa A. H. SO, or a. d. 699, His origin was a humble one, and his calling hum- bler still ; but devoting himself with ex- traordinary zeal to tlie study of the Koran, he was summoned to Bagdat by the khalif Almansor, who insisted that he shoidd undertake the office of cadi, or judge. He refused ; alleging as the cause, his want of the necessary quali- fications ; nor coidd menaces or imprison- ment shake his resolution. Nor was this the only occasion on which he suffered for his constancy. He was a great ad- herent of the house of AH, and the conse- quent enemy of the usurping Abbassides. Having the courage to defend the people of Mussoul before Abdalla H., he was imprisoned and poisoned by order of that khalif, A. H. 150. The greatest of his works — that on which his fame as a great doctor rests — is entitled Mesned, or Sup- port : it brings the support of passages from the Koran to all the fundamental doctrines of Islam. Of his mildness, his patience, which were almost superhuman, an anecdote is related with great applause by Mussulman writers. A man one day boxed him on the ear. " If I were re- vengeful," observed Abu Hanifa, " I should return the outrage. If I were a delator, I could accuse thee before the khalif. All the revenge I shall take will be this, — to pray God that we may enter heaven together !" ABU OBAID AL CASSIM BEN SALLAM, a native of Herat in the second century of the Hejira, wrote, or rather compiled, much. His book of the prophetic traditions, of which there is a copy at Leyden, cost him many years to collect. With another of his works, — a collection of Apologues and Proverbs, — European scholars are better acquainted, through the publication of two hundred Arabic proverbs by Erpenius at Leyden. The author died at Mecca, a. d. 839. ABU MANSUR, a celebrated Arabian astronomer of the ninth and tenth cen- turies, resided both at Bagdat and Da- mascus. He was much honoured by the khaUfs under whom he hved; and he did much service to science by his Ob- servations. A more intei-esting work would be his lives of the Arabian poets ; but, like too many other Mohammedan treasures, it is not likely to become ours. ABU MOSLEM, the chief to whom the Abbassides were much indebted for their accession to the throne of the kha- lifs. The feebleness of the Omeyas be- coming daily more manifest, and the tyranny of their officers more intolerable, 62 Ibrahim, a prince of Mahomet's house, aspired to the government of the Mo- hammedan world, and sent Abu Moslem to head his partisans in Chorasan. The general put to flight the governor depen- dant on Meruan, and rendered that vast province submissive to the house of Ab- bas. On the death of Ibrahim, Abid Abbas el Saffah continued Abu Moslem in the government of Chorasan. In a few years he made the pilgrimage to Mecca, and had the folly to offend Mansur, brother of the khalif, who was soon destined to succeed Abul Abbas. This wanton act sealed liis fate ; for though Mansur spared him until he had conquered Abdalla, who aspired to the khalifat, he was assassi- nated A.D. 755. Such was the reward which his services obtained from the house of Abbas. ABU NOWAS, (Abu Ali Al-Hassan,) an Arabian poet of the eighth centiuy, was a great favomite at the court of Aaron Al Raschid, ABU OBEIDA, one of the generals who most contributed to the triumph of Mahomet's new religion in the reigns of Abu Bekir and Omar. He had been the favourite of the prophet, who asserted that he was one of the men whose names were written in the book of life. His moderation in the hour of victory, and in his government of Syria, prove that he was influenced by the advice which he had received from Abu Bekir, (see the name. He died in the 18th year of the Hejira, corresponding to a.d. 639. ABU OSAIBAH, (Abid Abbas,) a celebrated physician of Syria, who died 1269. He was a disciple of Aben Bitar, and has left an important Biography of Physicians. ABU RYHEN, whose proper name was Mohammed ben Mohammed, a phy- sician, astronomer, and astrologer of the 10th century. He has left a Chronology, or Introduction to Judicial Astrology, and other works. ABU SAHAL, an Arabian physician, is said by D'Herbelot to have been the master of Avicenna. ABU SAID BEN ABUL HOSEIN, translated into Arabic from the Hebrew, The Five Books of Moses. Of this translation there are several MSB. in the great European libraries. ABU SAID MIRZA, great grandson of Timur, took advantage of the civil wars of Transoxiana, to seize on that province and Turkistan, about the middle of the 15 th century. He was conse- quently proclaimed sultan at Asterabad. ABU ABU Not satisfied with a success which he could never have anticipated, he directed his ambitious views to Irac and Adher- bijan, which he invaded and partly sub- dued. Falling into an ambuscade, how- ever, he was taken prisoner and brought before the sovereign whose dominions he had so wantonly invaded, and who put him to death, a.d. 1469. His em- jiire, prior to this disastrous expedition, comprised the regions between the Cas- pian Sea and Hindostan, from Cashgar to Tauris. ABU TAXFIN, king of Tremecen, succeeded by the crime of parricide, A.D. 1318. Ambition leading him to disturb his neighboui", the king of Tunis, he incurred the hostility of the king of Fez, who vanquished him, besieged him in his capital, reduced, and slew him. ABU TEMAM HABIB BEN AWS, called the prince of Arabian poets, was born in the neighbourhood of Damascus, about A. H. 170, or a. d. 787. His origin was humble, and his earliest calling mean. According to one account, he was employed in an Egyptian mosque, to serve the worsluppers with drink : according to another, he was a mason of Damascus. However this be, genius like his could not long remain hidden ; and it soon procured him the favour of the khalifs. In return, he flattered them. He collected many of the Arabic poems written before and after the prophet of Mecca ; and after his death, his own poems wei'e collected by Abu Bekir al Sooly, who arranged them in the alplia- betical order, and by Ali ben Hamza, who more wisely placed them under the pro- per subjects. The time of his death is unknown : Abulfeda conjectures it to have been in a. h. 228. Probably his life was a short one ; for, in the language of the East, " the keenness of his fancy consumed his mind, just as the sharpness of the blade wears the scabbai'd." Frag- ments of what he collected, but not of what he composed, have been published in different works. ABU THAHER, prince of the Car- mats, a sect which began to arise about the year 891, dethroned his brother in 913, and showed that he was well fitted for a bandit chief. In 923 he seized on Bus- sora, which he plundered during a week, and then retired with his booty. The year following, Cufa shared the same fate, and defeated the army of the khalif. Bagdat trembled, but the robber was satis- fied with plundering other towns. Mecca was the last place which he visited. He G3 slew the emir, and took away the Caaba, or holy stone, wluch had so long adorned the temple. ABU THALEB AL HOSEINI, trans- lated from Tartar into Persian the In- stitutes of Timur. If so, how could he, as the Biographic Universelle asserts, flourish in the reign of Saladin, and dedi- cate his translations to that monarch ? ABU YUSSEF, (Yacub,) a celebrated disciple of the above, who did much to disseminate the doctrines of his master. His learning was such that he was raised to the dignity of chief cadi, the duties of which high office he exercised under tliree successive khalifs. He died in a. h. 182. Of his modesty a favourite anecdote is related. "Thou receivest large sums of money from the khalifs treasury," said a man ; " yet thou addest little to the stock of legal knowledge." " I am paid for what I know," was the reply : " if I were paid for what I do not know, the khalif would not be rich enough to satisfy my claims !" ABUCARA, (Theodore,) bishop of Cairo in the eighth century, who, con- sulting his interests quite as much as his conscience, knew how to pass with safety through a troubled period. He wrote against the Jews, the Mohammedans, and heretics in general. ABUL ABBAS, surnamed Al-Saffa, or The Bloody, (Abdalla,) was the first khalif of the house of Abbas. He was the son of Mohammed, Mohammed of Ali, Ali of Abdalla, Abdalla of Abbas, the uncle of the pi-ophet ; he was, there- fore, a member of the holy family. On the death of his brother Ibrahim, (see the name,) being compelled to considt his safety by flight, he repaired to Cufa, by the inhabitants of which he was de- clared khalif. To understand this revo- lution, it is necessary to remember that the people of Cufa had never been favour- able to the Ommiades, or the khalifs of the house of Omeya (see Othman, third khalif; and Moakwa), who reigned at Damascus ; and they had, or pretended to have, great cause of complaint against the gover- nors nominated by the Omeyans. Abid Abbas promised to favour them ; and being supported by them, he declared war against Meruan, the last khalif of that race, whom he dethroned and slew. The manner in which he inveigled into his power the other Omeyan princes, and then put them to death, is the foulest blot on his memory ; hence pro- bably his surname of Al-saftat, the Bloody. Abderahman, however, as we have be- ABU ABU fore seen, escaped his vengeance, and founded a new dynasty in Spain. The reign of Abiil Abbas was a short one, ex- tending only from A.n. 132 to 136, or from A. D. 749 to 753. He was succeeded by thirty-seven khalifs of the same dynasty, who are generally called the Abassides, and who filled the throne of the prophet 524 Mohammedan years. ABUL CASSIM, a Mohammedan general of Iconium, who distinguished himself against the Greek emperor Alexis. But he had also to oppose the king of Persia, Melik Shah ; and as he was un- able to contend with both, he became the vassal of the Greek, and was enabled to resist the Persian. In the end, however, he was killed by order of Melik. ABUL CASSIM, (Tarif Aben Tarik,) the pretended author of a well-known Spanish Chronicle on the Conquest of Spain by the Arabs. This chronicle was long thought to be a translation from the Arabic, and its author to have been a companion of Musa, the conqueror of the Goths ; but the impostiu'e was at length exposed by Nicholas Antonio and other writers. Unfortunately, however, for the interests of historical truth, its fables were previously adopted by many historians of Spain, especially by Mari- ana, whose reputation is European. ABUL PARAGE, (Gregory,) whose name is generally latinized by Ahiilfa- ragius, was born at Malatia, in Asia Minor, a.d. 1226. His first piu-suit was medicine, which had been that of his father, but which he soon abandoned for sacred literature. With Greek, Syriac, and Arabic he was well acquainted, and they assisted him in his study of divi- nity, to which he devoted his future life. Entering the church, he must have been in priests' orders at an age not sanctioned by the canons, for he was only 20, we are told, when consecrated bishop of Guba. The Jacobites, however, to whose order he belonged, were not very observant of ancient discipline. In a short time he was translated to the see of Aleppo ; and at 40 years of age he became primate of the eastern Jacobites, a dignity which he held till his death in 1286. He is ■well known for a Universal History, from the Creation to his own times. It is of great value to the historian of the East, especially in regard to the Mongul Tar- tars, to Ghengis Khan, and to the Sara- cens. He wrote it in Syriac, but at the request of his friends he translated it into Arabic. Hence his fame among the Mohammedans, who have layislily praised 64 his great work, and have dignified hirti Avith the highest names. It was pub- lished by Pococke in 1663, together with a Latin version. In Germany it has been published in Syriac and Latin, with very good notes. Of Abulfaragius, Gib- bon speaks in high terms, and not more highlv than he deserves. ABUL FARAJ ALI, a celebrated Arabic poet, was born at Ispahan a.d. 897. He was descended from the khalif Meruan, the last of the Omeyas ; and was educated at Bagdat, where he died in his. 70th year. Of the many works which he wrote or compiled on history, juris- prudence, medicine, or poetry, one only is known in Europe. This is the Kiteb Aghany, a collection of ancient Arabic poems, which must be of inestimable value to the historians of Arabic poetry, a subject more vast than is generally sup- posed. ABUL FAZIL, (Alami,) the vizir of the emperor Akbar, and according to Ferishta, the most elegant wi'iter of Hindoostan. He was certainly the most usefiU. At the command of his imperial master, he composed or compiled the Akbar-Nameh, or Book of Akbar, in 3 vols. It may be divided into three great parts. The first treats of the ancestors of Akbar. The second relates the actions of Akbar down to the 47th year of his reign, when the author died. The third, Ayeen Akbery, Avhich was written by several learned men of Akbar 's court, under the direction of Abid-Fazil, is independent of the two former. It is a description at once minute and accurate of Hindo- stan, in her geographical, statistical, and physical relations. Each of the sixteen governments dependent on Delhi, their towns, fortresses, produce, revenues, and gradual annexation to the empire of the Mogids, may be seen in that important division. Nor does it omit the moral and religious condition of the people. It contains an excellent condensation of the Brahminical doctrines, and a view of the philosophic systems which have in suc- cession been adopted by the people. The extracts from Sanscrit authorities, which are translated into Persian, are very valuable. A portion only of this great work has been translated into English by Mr. Gladwin, and his book is very scarce. There is only one copy of the original, and it is in France ; we hope, however, that it will soon occupy the attention of oriental scholars. The end of Abul-Fazil was a tragic one. So great was his favom- with Ak- ABU ABU bar, so great his reputation, that he in- curred, first the envy, and next the hatred, of Selim, heir to the throne of the Moguls. At the instigation of this prince, he was imprisoned and slain hy a band of men, who were believed to be mere robbers, a. d. 1604. His loss was sensibly felt by the emperor. (Gladwin's Preface. Biog. Univ.) ABUL FEDA, (IsmaH,) the celebrated historian and geographer, born at Da- mascus, A.H. 672, or A.D. 1273. He was nobly descended, being sprung from Ayub ben Shady, and consequently of the same family as Saladin. Embracing the profession of arms, in the service of the Egyptian sultans, he was actively em- ployed against the Christians in Syria, whose empire in the east was now con- fined to a few insignificant fortresses. The troops which he commanded were those of the principality of Hamah, in S}Tia, which was a dignity in his family ; and he had always the post of honour, that is of danger, in the Moslem armies. On the reduction of the Christian knights, his next efforts were against the Tartars. On the death of his cousin, the reigning prince of Hamah, a. d. 1 299, he succeeded to that dignity. But it was disputed by his two elder brothers : a civil war seems to have followed ; and to extirpate it, a lieutenant of the sultan took possession of the principality in tlie name of his master. But Abul-feda suffered no disgrace, and he hoped to regain the principality. Nor was that liope vain ; for though many years elapsed, and many applications were made, before he obtained the object of his wishes, enough for him that his perse- verance was at length rewarded. This was in the year 1311. By his imperial master he was peculiarly honoured ; his government of Hamah was in the fullest sense of the word absolute ; and the title of Sultan, which gave him supremacy in matters religious no less than temporal, and which, in retin-ning from the pil- grimage of Mecca, he received from the klialif, placed him at the summit of his wishes. We may, however, observe that this high dignity was, at the period before us, much too easily conferred : there were sultans in most of the great cities ; and the lustre of the office was rendered less striking by its frequency. No doubt the khalif, though his throne was shaking imder him, was delighted with the title of Supreme Commander of the Faithful, — with being hailed as King of Kings. Abul-feda enjoyed the dignity in VOL. I. 65 ' peace till the close of his life, a. d. 1331. He had higher fame than that of a war- rior. He was a good statesman ; a good scholar ; zealously attached to literature and science, and the patron of both in a degree which we should not have expected from the troubles of the times. Of his works, two remain, which, both in Asia and Eiu-ope, have always been read with applause. The first, which is purely historic, is an epitome of Uni- versal History, and is divided into five parts. The first treats of the patriarchs, judges, prophets and kings of the Jews. The second records the four ancient dynasties of Persia. The third embraces the kings of Egypt and Greece, the kings and emperors of Rome. The fourth is occupied by the kings of Arabia before Mahomet. The fifth is devoted to many people, — to the SjTians, Sabean«, Copts, Persians, Greeks, &c., from the era of Mahomet to a. d. 1328. If the author has one great defect in common with nearly all the Moslem historians, — that of aridity ; if he relates facts without re- flection, ^vithout colouring, without ima- gination, he is superior to most of them in the accm-acy of his statements, in the extent of his materials, in the number of his authorities, in the value of the information which he has left us. Several parts of this great woi'k have been trans- lated into Latin, and even into some vernacular languages of Europe. The best known of these translations are the Life of Mahomet, — Additions to the Life of Saladin, — Mohammedan Annals, — History of the Arabs before Mahomet. Tlie gi'eater portion, however, of this history is still in MS. The second great work of Abul-feda is a Universal Geography. It has two divisions. The first contains a general view of regions, lakes, rivers, seas, and mountains. The second relates to cities and towns, to the provinces in which they are situated, to the manners, habits, occupations and resources of the people. It is interspersed with many curious ob- servations concerning the ancient no less than the modem state of those places. Several parts of this work have also been translated and published. It is much to be regretted that any portion of the royal historian's labours should remain inaccessible to the scholars of Europe. (D'Herbelot, Bibliotheque Orientale. Biograpliie Universelle. Gibbon, Decline and Fall.) In the Biographic Universelle, a list of those parts of Abul-feda's great works, F ABU A BU which have been published and trans- lated is found, wliicli is here given in an abridged fomi : — I. His historical work, Al-Mokhtassar fy Akhbar Albachar ; or. Abridged His- tory of the Human Race. The portion of this which relates to Sicily under the government of the Arabians, was trans- lated by Dobelius for his friend De Amico, early in the seventeenth century ; and Carusius (Bib. Sic.) and Muratori (Col- lection of Historians of Italy) have pub- hshed this translation. The other parts of this work already published are, — 1. De \Tita et rebus gestis Muhamedis Liber, Arabice et Latine, edente, cum notis, Job. Gagnier. Oxon. 1723. fol. 2. Auctarium ad Vitam Salidini, &c., cum versione Lat. ab Alberto Schultens, at the end of the Vita et Res gesta; Sultanii Saladini, aut. Bohcedino, Leyden, 1732, fol. 1755. 3. Annales Muslemici Lat. a J. J. Reiskio. Lipsite, 1754. (Con- tains from the birth of Mahomet to a. h. 406, A.D. 1015.) 4. Abul-Fedse Annales Muslemici, Arab, et Latine, opera et studio J. J. Reiskii &c. nunc priminn edidit Adler. Copenhagen, 1789-94. 5 vols. 4to. 5. Prof. White's edition of the Specimen Historise Arabum. Oxford, 1806. M. Silvestre de Sacy has given the History of the Arabs before Mahomet, in Arabic and Latin. II. His great geogi-aphical work, called, Tacouym El-Boldan. Of this there have been published — 1. Chorasmias et Mawaralnahrse, hoc est, regionum extra lluvium Oxum descriptio, ex tabulis Abul-Fedae Ismaelis Principis Hamah, Arab, et Lat. a J. Gravio. Londin. 1650. 4to. (Reprinted in Hudson's Minor Geographers, Oxf. 1698—1712. 4 vols. Svo ; and the Arabic is also foiuid there.) 2. Geographia Latine facta ex Ai-abico a J. J. Reiske. 3. Caput Primum Geogi'apbiae, &c. in Muratori, Antiquit. ItaU Medii ^Evi. 4. Tabula Syriae, Arab, et Lat. cum notis Koehler et Reiskii. 5. Descriptio ^Egypti, Arab, et Lat., ed. J. D. Michaehs. Gott. 1776, Svo. 6. Tabulae qusedam Geograpliicse et alia ejusdem argumenti Specimina. Ed. F. T. Rink. Lipsiae, 1791. Svo. 7. Africa, Arab, cum notis J. G. Eichom. Gotting. 1791. S. Tabula Septima, &c. Mesopotamiam exhibens, by Rosenmidler and Paulus, in the 3d vol. of the New Repertory of Oriental Literature. 1791. 9. The Arabia, by Chr. Rommel. Gotting. 1801. 4to.* * De Laroque has also given a French trans- lation at the end of the Voyage du Chevalier de CG ABUL GHASI BEHADER, usually known by the name of Abulgasi Khan, was a king of the family of Ghengis Khan, and born in Kharasm, a. n. 1606. He ascended the throne in 1645, but abdi- cated it two or three years before his death. He is well known for his Ge- nealogical History of the Tartars, which he composed after his secession from the duties of royalty, and which is of great use to the bistoi-ian of the east. It has been translated into Russian, German, and French, t ABUL HASSAN, (Ali,) an astronomer of Morocco early in the thirteenth cen- tmy. One of his works was translated into French by M. Sedillot in 1810. ABUL MAHASAN, an Arabic histo- rian of Aleppo, in the fifteenth century, Avho wrote much, but whose chief work is entitled, ' Shining Stars ; or, a History of Egj'pt and Cairo.' According to Sil- vesti'e de Sacy, this is one of the books that most demands a translation. There are several MSS. of it in most gi-eat libraries of Europe. A small abridgment of these annals was published at Cam- bridge in 1792, with a Latin version by Carlyle. Another work of this author, — a biographical dictionary, of which 5 vols, are in the royal hbrary of Paris, ought also to be translated and pubUshed. ABUL OLA, a celebrated Arabian poet, (973 — 1057,) whose free opinions, and still freer life, gave much scandal to the devout Moslems. Though blind, he exhibits considerable knowledge of the world, which he is at no time disposed to spare. Extracts from his poems are given by Fabricius and Golius, but they have no great merit. ABUL WAFFA, (Mob. Ben Yahia,) an Arabian mathematician and astro- nomer of the tenth century. ABUNDANCE, (Johan d') the as- sumed name of a French poet, in the 16th century; wrote some mysteries and moralities. He called himself also Maistre Tyhurce. His Morality of the Passion of our Lord is so rare, that the copy in the Paris library is thought unique. Arvieux ; and Thevenot has given a translation of some portions of the ivork in his Recueil des Voyages; and lastly, in 180S, a translation of the parts of Abul-feda, previously published, was printed in Modern Greek at Vienna. + The French edition was published at Leyden, 2 vols. 12mo, 1726, and is made from the German, and enriched with excellent notes. M. Langles, however, says, (Biog. Univers.) that he has pointed out some of "the errors of this edition in his Notice of the Khans of the Crimea, appended to the 3d vol. of the Voyage de Forster. AB Y A C A ABYDENUS, an historian mentioned by Eusebius, St. Cyril, and Syncellus. Very little isknown of him. If, as the name imports, he was a native of Abydos, we are still far from learning where he lived, since there were four places of the name. What is certain is, that he made the pre- ceding work of Berosus the foundation of his own. If, as Scipio Tetti informs us, the original work of Abydenus (which we know only from the fragments pre- served by the writers we have mentioned) really exists in some ItaUan library, it should be looked for without delay. ACACIUS, (surnamed Monophthalmus, or One-eyed,) bishop of Ceesarea, and successor of Eusebius, was deposed by the council of Sardis for his heretical opinions in regard to the divinity of Christ. He had, however, a party which met at Philippopolis, in Thrace, and con- demned the opposite party. Protected by the emperor Constantius, he did not hesitate to depose St. Cyril from the see of Jerusalem, and to assist in the expvd- sion of Pope Libei'ius. He died in 365. He was said to be a man of talent and eloquence, but of most unstable opinions and versatile conduct. On some occasions he went even beyond the Arians themselves. His writings were very numerous, but none remain, except a long extract fi'om an answer of his to Marcellus, which is preserved in Epi- phanius Hasres. 72. He wrote a Mfe of Eusebius, which might probably be more valuable than his doctiines or his commentaries. In proof of his imstable opinions, the following summary of them, from Mr. Newman's able History of the Arians of the Fourth Century, may be adduced. After praising his talents, he adds, " He began at first with professing himself a Semi-Arian, after the example of Eusebius his master ; next, he became the founder of the party which wll pre- sently be described as the Homoean; 3dly, he joined himself to the Anomoe- ans or pure Arians, so as even to be the intimate associate of the wretched jEtius; 4thly, at the command of Constantius, he deserted and excommunicated him ; 5thly, in the reign of the catholic Jovian, he signed the Homoousion, or Symbol of NicEea." (Newman, p. 296. See his his- tory in the following chapter of the same work. Cave, Hist. Lit. i. 206.) ACACIUS, bishop of Berea in the 4th century, had notoriety enough for his time. He shone in several disputes and at several councils ; but his persecu- tion of his former friend St. Chrysostom, G1 and his assistance in the consecration of Porphyiy as bishop of Antioch, brought on his head the excommunication of the pope, from which he was absolved in about ten years. Some of his letters are extant, and they seem to prove that he was not very favourable to the conduct of St. Cyril in the affair of Nestorius. ACACIUS, bishop of Amida early in the 5th century, has obtained even the praise of Gibbon, for the noble charity which caused him to feed and to redeem 7,000 Persian captives, by disposing of the plate belonging to his cathedral. On their mentioning this conduct to their monarch, he consented to a peace with Theodosius the younger, even when his armies had triumphed. ACACIUS, patriarch of Constantino- ple in 471. This prelate lived in times of difficvdty, and his history is not without its difficulties, from the contending ac- counts of friends and foes. He was so strongly opposed to the supremacy of Rome, that being excommunicated by pope Felix, he defied his power, and erased his name in return from the sacred tablets. This contest with the popes had chiefly arisen in consequence of his patronage of Peter the Fuller, whom he had fixed in the see of Antioch, a.d, 482, and in consequence of the famous decree of the * Henoticon' (or decree of union intended to reconcile the two par- ties) wluch the emperor Zeno published in the same year, by his counsel and assistance. The Latin chinxh considered this decree injurious to the doctrines maintained in the council of Chalcedon ; and although the Greek church defended the memory of the patriarch for a time, they consented to expunge his name from the sacred diptychs, in a.d. 519. Those who are desirous of investigating these points, mil find copious references in Mosheim, Part II. chap. v. § 15 — 23. But, at all events, this decree was agree- able to the views of Peter the Fuller, and Mongus, the heads of the sect of the Monophysites, although it went against the Arians and Eutychians; and hence theWestern church took doctrinal grounds for an attack on Acacius. In former days, Acacius had been a strong defender of the coimcil of Chalcedon, and had forced BasUicus to abandon his opposi- tion to it, and he was very instrumental in assisting Zeno to his throne. What- ever may be thought of his doctrines, he must be praised for his noble defence of the empress Ariadne, whom Zeno had commanded to be put to death, and whose F 2 AC A ACC life he was the means of. saving. He died in 489. Two letters of liis are extant : one to Peter the Fuller, on the Ti'isagium ; the other to Simplicius, on the Alexan- drian church. (Cave, Hist. Lit. vol. i. Mosheim, id supra, &c.) ACADEMUS, or HECADEMUS, a private individual of Athens, who left to the people a portion of ground for a public walk. By Hipparchus, it was sur- rounded Avith walls ; by Cimon, it was planted with trees. By Plato and his dis- ciples it was much frequented : hence the term Academy, as applied to the meet- ings of literary men or philosophers. ACAMAPIXTLI, founder of the Mexican kingdom, about a.d. 1380. Pi-e- viously to this event, the Asteques, or ancient Mexicans, were merely a leachng tribe of a small locality, who had removed to that locality from the north, and were governed by many chiefs. Seeing the advantages of combination, the warriors resolved to have a supreme chief, or king, and they elected Acamapixtli, the grand- son of a neighbouring king with whom they had been at war. Such is the native tradition ; but there is reason to believe that this prince was the conqueror of the Asteques, and that he forced them to receive his yoke. It appears, however, that he governed with great success and great moderation ; that he was the legis- lator no less than the protector of his people ; that he persuaded or forced other tribes to unite with the Asteques ; that he thus laid the foundation of a great empire, and if he did not build, he greatly enlarged his capital, Tenochitlam, the modern Mexico ; that he dug canals, threw bridges over the rivers, and con- structed aqueducts which long afterwai'ds commanded the admiration of the Spa- niards. He was therefore the founder, not merely of the empire, but of its civilization. There seems, however, some reason to doubt whether he rescued his people from their dependence on Tepeacan, a kingdom on the shores of the Mexican Gulf. Be this as it may, he was regarded with much reverence by his contemporaries and by posterity. Though, on his death, he left to his people the free choice of their nder, they would not overlook his own family, and the sceptre was placed in the hands of his son Vitzilocutli. ACARQ, a French grammarian of the last century, who wrote a philosopliical grammar, critical observations on the most eminent French writers, and many other things which nobody read when he 68 was alive, and which arc not likely to be more fortunate now. ACC A, (Saint,) bishop of Hagulstadt, or Hexham, in Nortlmmberland ; suc- ceeded to the mitre of St. Wilfrid in 709. Like his predecessor, whom he had accompanied in many Avanderings, he was a monk ; and what he had seen in Italy he was anxious to imitate in the Saxon province of Northumbria. Hence after his election he greatly embellished the cathedral of Hexham, and introduced the Gregorian chaunt into the choir. He died in 740. He wrote on the sufferings of the saints ; offices for his churches ; and some letters, among which there is one addressed to Bede. Hist. Eccl. v. 21. ACCACIUS, (St.) bishop of Antioch, Asia Minor, is celebrated for his coura- geous defence of Christianity before Mar- tian. His examination being laid before Decius, that emperor, admiring his intre- pidity, ordered him to remain unmolested. ACCARISI, (Alberto,) of Ferrara, the first man, we are told, that published a dictionary of his own language. There were two other Italian writers of this name. Francesco Accarisi was a learned jurisconsult, who explained the Institutes and the Pandects with great applause. He died as professor at Pisa in 1612. Jacopo Accarisi was a rhetorician of Mantua, who died in 1654, and who wrote a history of the Propa- ganda missions, of the War in Flanders, Latin Epistles, &c. ACCIAIUOLI, (Nicolas,) grand se- neschal of Naples, an adventurer from Florence, who owed his fortune as much to the favour of queens as to lois own merits. He died very rich in 1366. A nephew of the preceding, whom Nicolas had called to the Neapolitan court, was placed in the household of Maria de Boxubon, titular empress of Constantinople. Receiving from the im- perial family, which, though exiled, had still some possessions in Greece, the lord- ship of Corinth, he annexed Athens to it, and obtained the title of duke, as Re- nier I. He died early in the fifteenth century, without legitimate male issue ; but his bastard son, Antonio, Avhom he made lord of Corinth, subsequently ob- tained the dukedom of Athens. ACCIAJUOLI, (Donato,1428— 1478,) a native of Florence, distinguished him- self by his cidtivation of Greek Hterature, no less than by the manner in Avhich he discharged his important public duties. Though enjoying the highest dignities of the republic, he died poor — a rare instance ACC ACC of disinterestedness in so corrupt an age. He wrote on the philosophy of Aristotle ; translated into Latin some of Plutarch's Lives, and into the Tuscan language a Latin history of his country. See Tira- boschi, vol. vi. p. 807. Two poets of this name, Pietro and Jacopo, both Florentines by descent, ^\Tote good Latin poetry in the sixteenth century. (Tiraboschi, vii. 1384, 5.) A third, Zeusbio, a Dominican friar, librarian of the Vatican, also a Floren- tine, who died at Rome in 1519, translated into Latin three of the Greek fathers. (Ti- raboschi, vol. vii. p. 224, 1111, &c. A fourth, Filippo, of the order of Malta, (1637 — 1700,) wrote some musical ACCIAJUOLI SALVETTI, (Mada- lina, d. 1610,) was a poetess of some note in her day. She left 2 vols, of Rime Toscane, and an unfinished poem on the flight of David. ACCIEN, or properly Baghi Syan, was the grandson of Alp Arslan, (see the name,) who conferred on his father, Mo- hammed, the government of Antioch. To that government he succeeded, and was reigning in 1097, when the city was besieged by the crusaders. He defended it with valour ; but the following year it was betrayed into the hands of the crusaders ; and Accien, who fled, was killed by an Armenian. ACCIO ZUCCO, surnamed Da Sum- ma Campagna, an Italian poet of the fifteenth century ; translated into Italian sonnets the Fables of ^sop ACCIUS NEVIUS, one of the Roman augurs in the time of Tarquin the Elder, who opposed the expedition of that king against the Sabines. The fable of the razor and the stone is too well known to be repeated here. The augur seems to have been removed by violence ; and probably the statue wluch Tarquin erected to him, and which was standing in the time of Augustus, was the effect of remorse. ACCIUS, (Lucius,) called also Attius, a tragic poet, was bom, according to St. Jerome, about a. c. 170. He wrote several tragedies, and is praised by Quin- tillian, by Tacitus, and even by Horace and Ovid. Of his pieces, which once formed the delight of the Romans, some inconsiderable fragments only remain. They have been collected by Robert Stephens. He is mentioned and quoted more than once by Cicero also. For more on Attius or Accius, see the com- mentators on Hor. Sat. I. x. 53, the Ency. 69 Metr. Hist. Div. ii. 390, and Reuven'a Collectanea Literaria. Leyden, 1815. ACCOLTI. Of this name are several distinguished Itahans. 1. Benedetto, a jurisconsult and his- torian, of the fifteenth century ; was pro- fessor at Florence, and ultimately chan- cellor of that republic. He WTote on the wars of the first crusade, and on the cele- brated men of his own time. Died 1466. 2. Francesco, brother of the preceding, was also svu-named of Arezzo, and Aretin, from the place of his birth. He was also a lawyer ; but he found time enough for literary pursuits, especially for transla- tions from the Greek. These were nu- merous, but, from the judgment of Eras- mus, we may conclude that they were of no great merit. He appears to have been more successftd in his works on juris- prudence. As a poet, he seems just to have reached mediocrity. Died 1483. (See Tiraboschi, vi. 756.) 3. Bernardo, the son of Benedetto, was a poet of greater reputation than his micle, and was siu^named il Unico Aretin — a preeminence which, judging from his extant compositions, we should scarcely have inferred. Still less should we have concluded from them alone that they were heard with such rapturous applause, that when he entered a city it was all in mo- tion to hear him ; that the house in which he recited was absolutely besieged, and guards placed at the gates to prevent an ingi-ess sufficient to crush everj' one within to death ; that the streets were illuminated, and the very shops closed, when he was thus exhibiting. Such statements we cannot understand ; surely they must be outrageous exaggerations. Probably much of his fame rested on that which coidd not descend to posterity — on his extempora- neous verses. In this case well would it have been for him had he written nothing : we should then have been unable to disprove the encomia of his contemporories. By Leo X. he was much beloved — perhaps enriched. The year of his death is unknoAvn ; but he survived Ariosto. (See Tiraboschi, vi. 835.) 4. Pietro, brother of the preceding, and consequently son of Benedetto, (1455 — 1532,) born at Florence, professed law at Pisa,'entered the church, became bishop and cardinal, cardinal-vicar, and papal legate. He is known in history as the cardinal of Ancona. He drew up the bviU which, in 1 5 1 9, was hurled against Luther ; and he left some legal treatises of no great merit. In few respects does he appear to have much claim on our esteem. ACC ACC 5. Benedetto, known as the cardinal of Ravenna, nephew of the two preceding, and grandson of Benedetto the historian. Born in 1497, he was a cardinal (thanks to his uncle !) in 1527. Like his uncle, he left illegitimate childi-en ; and from his imprisonment by the pope, we may infer that this was not his .only crime. He left some Latin compositions, espe- cially poetry, which he wrote well enough. He died at Florence in 1549. (See Tiraboschi, vol. vii. p. 1387, et seq.) 6. Leonardo, son of Fabricio, who was a bastard of the above cardinal. He wrote the hfe of Benedetto, the founder of the family, and a history of the war against the infidels. 7. Pietj-o, brother of the preceding, 'wrote two trifles. ACCORAMBONI. Of this name were several Italians, of whom their own coun- trymen think highly. 1. Geronimo, a physician, (1467 — 1557,) left three medical treatises. 2. Fabio, (1502—1559,) son of the preceding, a jurisconsult who held some dignities at the papal court, and left some legal treatises. 3. Felix, the son or grandson of the preceding, a physician, poet, and philo- sopher ; commented on Aristotle, wrote History of Plants, &c. 4. Virginia, belonging, we suppose, to some branch of the family, was the wife, first, of Francesco Peretti, nephew of Sixtus v., and after his assassination, of Pablo Girolamo Orsini, duke of Arcenno. She lived in an age when virtue was at a low ebb, and corriiption had established itself in high places ; and she did not escape suspicion, for she was accused of murdering her first husband, and was long a prisoner. In 1585 she fell beneath the dagger of her second husband's kinsman. She wrote some poetry. ACCORSO. Of this name too there were many persons of reputation in Italy. 1. Francesco, the jurisconsult, (1151 — 1229,) a native of Florence, and professor at Bologna ; collected the opinions and decisions of his predecessors on the most important points of Roman law. His work is called the Great Gloss, or the Continued Gloss. It was a monument of labour, of industry, of legal research, and for the age was useful ; but the author had not the general learning necessary for the illustration of the laws ; he was not historian enough to know the occasions v/hich had pi-oduced them ; he knew little of coins and inscriptions, which are pow- erfid auxiliaries of Roman jurisprudence. 70 Hence his numerous errors, which have caused more recent commentators to un- dervalue his merits. They say that the proverb ' Grsecum est, non legitur,' by which the jurisconsults of those days escaped a difficulty, arose from him. Tiraboschi entirely doubts this story, but doubts also his knowledge of Greek, (iv. 344.) 2. Francesco, son of the preceding, professed at Bologna with as much ap- plause as his father had done. When, in 1273, our Edward I. passed through Bologna, he was so delighted with this professor, that he made him royal offers to undertake the same chair at Thou- louse. The Bolognese would not hear of his departure ; they threatened to con- fiscate his property if he did. But he secretly left, and his property was con- fiscated. If there be any truth in a weU-known anecdote, his abilities were somewhat overvalued by Edward. As he was one day explaining the text of the law on usury to his hearers at Thou- louse, one of them, whom he knew not, and whom nobody had seen before, made to his interpretation some objections strong enough to surprise him, and to make him confess that the disciple knew more than the luaster. But this was not a disciple ; it was the celebrated jiu'is- considt Jacopo, of Ravenna, who had attended the lecture incog. From Thou- louse, Francesco was di'awn to Oxford, where he remained some time. In 1280 he returned to Bologna, procured the restitution of his property and his pro- fessorship, and ched in 1328. 3. Cervot, brother of the preceding, a lawyer also, but of much less note. 4. Mariangelo, a native of Aquila in the kingdom of Naples, a good classical scholar and ci'itic in the first half of the sixteenth century ; was a great favourite of the emperor Charles V. at whose court he lived above thirty years. He was famous too for his skill in modern lan- guages ; and as Charles himself was a good linguist, we may infer that his repvi- tation in this respect was fully deserved. To collate the MSB. and thereby to cor- rect the text of ancient writers, was his favourite occupation. Ausonius, Ovid, Cassiodorus, and Claudian, were the au- thors who benefited most by his critical labours ; and these labours have not been without their use to recent commentators. Of Ammianus Marcellinus he published a new echtion, and corrected above 5000 errors in the Editio Princeps. He -wi-ote also a fable, some verses, and a satire. ACE A CH ACEPSIMAS, (St.) bishop of Honlta, in Assyria, should be reverenced for the indomitable courage with which he suf- fered torments and martyrdom during the persecution of Sapor, king of Persia. Yet he was much of a fanatic, and he was anxious to provoke his fate. ACERBI, (Giuseppe,) of whom we know nothing except that he travelled to the North Cape, and published a relation of what he had seen. When the Italian edition appeared we know not, but in 1804 a French translation issued from the press, and was soon followed by an English one. This book is amusing in general, though one is sometimes dis- gusted with the author's flippancy and evident laxity of principle. ACERBI, (Enrico, 1785—1827,) a native of Costano, became a celebrated physician, and practised at Milan with success. His medical treatises, however, are of too local a character to be useful beyond the confines of Italy. ACERNUS, (S.B. 1551—1608,) a ma- gistrate of Lubhn, wrote some Latin and Polish poetry, and several prose tracts. ACESEUS, a Greek artist, famous for embroidering. Some of his handy- work was to be seen in the temple of the Pythian Apollo ; but his master- piece, in which he was assisted by his son Helicon, was the mantle of Minerva in the citadel of Athens. ACESIUS, bishop of Constantinople in the reign of Constantine the Great, was a disciple of Novatus, and noted for the severity with which he would enforce church discipline. The men who had apostatized under persecution, or who even had committed a mortal sin after baptism, ought not, he contended, what- ever the degree of repentance, to be re-admitted to the communion of the church. While supporting this outra- geous opinion at the gi-eat council of Nice (325), the emperor observed to him : " Then, Acesius, you may make a ladder for yourself, and ascend to heaven alone !" ACESTOR. Of this tragic poet no- thing is known except what is stated by the Schol. on Aristoph. 'Opv. 31, that he was ridiculed for affecting to be an Athenian, when he was in reality a Mysian, and, as appears from the frag- ments of contemporary comic writers there quoted, the worst of dramatists. ACEVEDO, (Alonso M.) an en- lightened advocate of Madrid, who wrote against the use of torture in all criminal proceedings ; and other legal works, in- 71 dicative alike of his humanity and eru- dition. He died about 1780. ACEVEDO, (Felix Alvarez,) born in the province of Leon, studied at Sala- manca, was called to the bar at Madrid, embraced the military career, and when Napoleon invaded Spain in 1808, was nominated by the junta of Leon com- mandant of the volunteers. During the war of independence he attained the rank of colonel. In 1820, when the re- volution of the isle of Leon broke out, he declared for the insin-gents, and was declai-ed general of the Galician forces. Forcing San Roman, who commanded for the king, to leave the province, he pursued him, and just as he had assailed him at the village of Padoruela, received three mortal wounds. ACHA, (Mamen ben Cais,) an Ara- bian poet, of or before the time of Ma- homet. Of his only piece, which contains no more than sixty-four vers'es, an ana- lysis has been given by De Sacy. ACH^MENES, brother of Xerxes, commanded the naval expedition against Greece. He fell against the combined Athenians and Egj'ptians, a. c. 462. ACH^US. There were three per- sons of this name. The first was an historian mentioned by the Schol. on Pind. Ol. vii. whom Vossius (De Histor. Graec. iv. 3, p. 501) is disposed to iden- tify with the individual whom the Schol. on Aratus unites ^vith Pherecydes, and perhaps with the historian Archaeus, quoted by the Schol. on Nicand. Ther. — The second Achaeus was the Eretrisean, and the son of Pythodoiiis, or Pytho- doris. He was a little junior to Sopho- cles, and a competitor with Euripides. He wrote, says Suidas, according to different accounts, forty-four, thirty-four, and twenty-four plays. Eudocia (Violar, p. 69) swells the list to sixty-four. But be the number what it may, he obtained the prize only once. He seems to have been fond of the satiric di-ama, to which nearly all of those whose titles have been preserved confessedly belong. His re- mains are to be found in the edition by Ulrich — AcliEei quae supersunt, collecta et digesta ; Bonnae, 1 834 ; who, however, says Welcker, in the Rheinesches Mu- seum, t. iii. p. 634, has not done much for the improvement of the text. According to a grammarian, quoted in Montfaucon, Bibl. Coislin. p. 597, and Proclus, in Chrestomath, p. 340, it appears that Achseus, despite his ill success, was placed by the Alexandrine critics in the same class with vEschylus, Sophocles, ACH A CH Euripides, and Ion. — The third Achseus was of Syi'acuse, and wrote ten tragedies, according to Siiidas (Eiidocia says four- teen), of which nothing is known, not even the title of a single play. ACHAIUS, king of the Scots, from 788 to 819. His reign is said to have been a prosperous one ; but some fables are recounted of him. He coidd not send Alcuin and Joannes Scotus as am- bassadors to Charlemagne, because from 782 to 804 the former was always in France, and because the latter could scarcely be born when the king died. ACHARD, abbot of St. Victor at Paris, and afterwards bishop of Avran- ches, (d. 1171,) was high in the favoiu- of our Henry II. He wrote De Tenta- tione Christi, and De Divisione Animse et Spiritiis. This churchman should not be con- founded with the Achard who in the same century wrote the Life of St. Gesselin, and who was a disciple of St. Bernard. ACHARD, (Antoine, 1696—1772,) a Calvinistic minister of Geneva and Ber- lin, wrote some sermons, and was held in much respect by his patron, the king of Prussia. A son of the preceding, Frant^ois Achard, contributed many good papers to the literary and scientific journals of his time. ACHARD, (Fran9ois, 1708 — 1784,) probably a kinsman of Antoine, wrote on the summation of infinite series. ACHARD, (Claude F, 1753—1809,) a physician, secretary and hbrarian of the Marseilles academy, wrote some useful books. Among these are — 1. Diction- naire de la Provence, et du Comtat Ve- naissin. (Marseilles, 4 torn. 4to. 1785.) The first two vols, only are occupied by the vocabulary ; the last two, which are the more important, are devoted to the biography of eminent natives of Pro- vence. In this labour the author was assisted by other pens. 2. Descrip- tion Historique, &c. de la Provence, of which one volume only was published. 3. Tableau de Marseille, which is also imperfect. All three should be consulted by the historian of France. ACHARD, (F. C. 1753 — 1821,) a chemist of Berlin, who enjoyed consider- able celebrity from his successful conti- nuation of the experiments of Marcgraf, as to whether sugar coidd be extracted from various roots. He soon proved that it could, especially from the beet-root ; and his success has given rise to many large establishments in Germany and 72 France for the manufacture of that useful commodity. Connected with this and kindred subjects, he wi-ote sevei^l che- mical works in the German language. ACHARDS, (Eleazar F. de la Baume des, 1679 — 1741,) a native of Avignon, and titular bishop of Halicamassus, passed many laborious years as a mis- sionary in his own coimtry ; but he foimd many obstacles from the rivalship of dif- ferent ecclesiastical orders. When sent to Cochinthina, he was not more edified there than he had been in France : not only was one order opposed to another, but national rivalry set ecclesiastics of the same order against one another. The dislike of the Itahan missionaries to those of France, was extreme. As Aasitor apostolic, he endeavoured to effect peace between the contending parties. " Peace!" replied father Martioli, " I would as soon make peace with the devil as with a Frenchman!" What good could be ef- fected by the poor bishop? He died without doing any, in two years after his arrival. ACHARIUS, (Eric, 1757—1819,) an eminent Swedish botanist. Born at Gcfle, he received his education there, till he went to the university of Upsal in 1773. He was very poor, and obliged to main- tain himself by giving private lessons. In the course of some literary and scien- tific occupation confided to him by the university, becoming acquainted with Bergius, Martin, and Wilcke, he made great progress in different branches of science, chemistry, &c. ; and by his con- stant attention to the hospitals, he ren- dered himself one of the most able medical men in Sweden. In 1782 he became M.D. of Limd. In 1801 he became professor of botany, and he be- stowed his attention on that science, to which he had always been attached, and especially to the large and compli- cated class of Cryptogamic plants com- prehended under the name of L\chen. He subdivided the genus Lichen of Lin- nseus into forty smaller genera, and these again have been subdivided by succeed- ing botanists. But it appears that he was too much inclined to make subdi- visions, and to rest his distinctive marks on accidental differences, by which he often separates species which ought to be kept together ; and he has made con- siderable confusion by this circumstance. Still his labours have been highly useful, and succeeding lichenists (Fries, Esh- weiler, Meyer, Fee, Wallroth, Zenker, Schultz, Reichenbach, and others) have ACH ACH gone over tlie ground trodden by Mm, to improve and re-arrange this world of minute plants. May it be permitted to the writer of this notice, to express his regret that the specimen of a Licheno- graphia Britannica, projected and partly executed by Messrs. W. Borrer and Daw- son Turner, has remained imperfect, and has only been issued for private circu- lation ! It would have done service in this branch of botany. Constant refer- ence is made in it to Dr. Acharius. His works are — 1. Lichenographiae Suecicse Prodromus ; Lincoping, 8vo, 1798. 2. Methodus Lichenum, &c. ; Stockholm, 1803, 8vo. 3. Lichenographia Univer- salis ; Gottingen, 1804, 4to. 4. Synopsis Methodica Lichenum ; Lund, 1814, 4to. ACHARY, or ASHARI, foimder of the sect of the Acharians in the ninth century, who died at Bagdat in the tenth ; was the disciple of Al-Jobbai, from whom he separated on the following occasion : — " A dispute arose between them respect- ing three brothers; of whom one lived righteously, the second wickedly, the third died an infant. 'What is their fate?' inquired the disciple. 'The first,' replied the master, 'vnR go to heaven, the second to hell, the third to neither, for he wiU be neither rewarded nor pu- nished.' This orthodox reply did not satisfy the acute inquirer, who observed that the third would have reason to com- plain, since he might say, ' God, liadst thou given me longer life, I might have entered paradise with my believing bro- ther !' ' But,' rephed Al-Jobbai, ' might not Allah, with equal reason, say, I cut thee off because I foresaw that thou wouldst be wicked, and in consequence damned?' 'That,' rejoined the disciple, ' does not mend the matter ; for might not the condemned brother say, Allah, why didst thou not call me away while an infant, that, like my brother, I too might have escaped hell ?' To this observation Al-Zobbai could make no other answer than that the life of the condemned man was prolonged that he might have the means of salvation. 'Then,' rejoined the pertinacioxis scholar, ' why not allow the infant brother the same advantage V The master, alike puzzled and enraged, de- manded, ' Is not the devil in thee ?' ' No,' replied Ashari ; ' but I plainly see that the master's ass will not pass the bridge !' Discontented with his teacher, Ashari left him, and established a new sect. He al- lowed the attributes of God to be distinct from his essence ; but forbade the doctrine to be pushed further. In regard to pre- 73 destination, he exhibited great subtlety. He taught that God creates all human actions, and thereby renders all inevit- able ; but then, to reconcile this doctrine Avith free-will, he places two co-existent facidties in man — power and choice ; so that the action itself wiU not start into being, or rather \vill not outwardly mani- fest itself, without the contemporaneous exercise of the will. Thus, the action, as created, is the work of God; as de- veloped, it is that of man. This junc- tion of the will with the pre-existing or pre-determined action, is called the ac- quisition of that action. But here, again, many split on the rock of fatality ; for making the power and choice alike in- evitable, by subjecting the very intention, no less than the action, to necessary and uncontrollable influence, they render man the mere insti-ument of his own destiny. To reconcile these conflicting principles, — to vindicate the justice of God and the free agency of man, — the cadi Abu Bekir contends that the essence or substance of the action is from God ; but whether that action be obedience, as prayer — or dis- obedience, as fornication, entirely depends on the power of men. 'But,' said this primitive Moslem, let us not too nicely examine these matters, but leave them to Allah, and do the best we can ; knowing, as we do, that the gviilt or merit of ac- tions will be imputed to us.' " (Dun- ham's Spain and Portugal, vol. iv. It is condensed from D'Herbelot, and the Introduction to Sale's Koran.) ACHE, (the Count d', 1716 to about 1790,) a vice-admiral in the French navy. During his command of a squadron in the East Indies, his countrymen lost all their settlements. ACHE, (R. F. d', 1809,) of the same family and profession as the preceding, and no less unfortunate, was killed on the French coast by the marine guard, one dark night in September. ACHEN, (John Van, 1556—1621,) a native of Cologne, who, as a painter, enjoyed some degree of celebiity in Ger- many. He painted the Resurrection for the Elector of Bavaria, his best work ; and tlie emperor Rhodolphus was so pleased with his Venus and Adonis, that he patronized him through life. He was one of the first to abandon the stiff old style of drawing, and introduce tlie graces he had learned in Italy. (Bryan's Diet.) ACHENWALL, (Godfrey, 1719— 1772,) a native of Elbing, in Prussia. Ho has been called the founder of statistics, ACH ACH and he published several treatises con- nected with the science. He also wrote on the public law of Europe, on the law of nature and of nations, &:c., during his long professorship at Gottingen. ACHERY, (Jean Luc d', 1609— 1685,) one of the most distinguished members of the congregation of St. Maur, was a native of St. Quentin. In 1632 he pro- fessed as a monk of St. Benedict in the reformed order of St. Maur, re- mained for some time in the monastery of the Holy Trinity at Vendome ; and then removed to the abbey of St. Ger- main des Pres, Paris. Notwithstanding his bodily infirmities, among which was the stone, he applied himself with ardour to ecclesiastical literature. The first of his pubhcations was Epistola Catholica S. Barnabae Apostoli, but as he made use of the notes left by father Menard, he did not prefix his own name to it. The Life and Works of Lanfranc, archbishop of Canterbury, was the next publication of Dom Luc. Tlie Life he found among the manuscripts in the monastery of Bee, of which the illustrious prelate was once abbot. The notes exhibit considerable erudition ; and the appendix contains a life of St. Herhiin, founder of Bee, and of four other abbots ; a Chronicle of that Monasteiy from 1304 to 1437 ; with some dogmatic treatises intended to illustrate the controversy between Lanfranc and Berenger. In the same' year Dom Luc published a catalogue of ascetic divines. In 1651 appeared a work much more im- portant, — one Avhich threw great light on the history no less than the antiquities of the church. This was the Life and Works of Guibert, abbot of Nogent-sous-Couci, in the twelfth century. It has recently been translated by Guizot, in his Collec- tion des Memoiresrelatifs a I'Histoire de France. We have often consulted it with advantage. But the best known, and to the student of the middle ages the most useful, of this monk's pubhcations is, Ve- terum aliquot Scriptorum qui in Galhse Bibliothecis, maxime Benedictinorum, latuerant, Spicilegium (13 tom. 4to. 1653 ■ — 1677). Though the editor styles this a Spicilegium, or gleaning only, it affords, in truth, an abundant harvest to aU who choose to labour in the field. Acts, canons, covmcils, chronicles, biographies, particular histories, epistles, poems, diplomas, and other instruments at once rare and cui-ious, attest his indefatigable industry. But Dom Luc is somewhat more than an editor. Each of the thirteen volumes contains a preface, 74 intended to show the state of the Chris- tian world, and of letters, when the pieces were written ; and each is enriched by notes, which, taken in connexion with the introduction, exhibit an erudition so vast as to svirprise the modern reader. It is, however, more vast than methodical ; and much inferior in this respect to the new edition published in 1723 by La Barre, in 3 vols. fol. This editor arranges the pieces under the head of subjects, and each subject chronologically, so as to afford two advantages seldom to be met in works of this kind. Yet La Barre is not to be dismissed without censure. He has mutilated the learned prefaces, and has inserted his own coiTections in the text. Dom Luc has another claim on the gratitude of ecclesiastical students. He collected many of the materials for that ponderous work. Acta Sanctoi"um Ordinis St. Benedicti in Sseculorum Classes distributa, edited by Mabillon (see the name), and extending to 9 vols, fol. This monk was true to his profes- sion ; he passed his years in literature and devotion ; he hved as if buried to the world; and he enjoyed the esteem of the most distinguished persons of the age. How one with so feeble a constitution, and subject to so dreadfid a malady, con- trived to reach his 76th year, cannot easily be conceived. (Eloge de Dom Luc d'Achery, per Maugendre. Les Ecrivains de la Congregation de St. Maur. Biog. Univ.) ACHILLAS, minister and general of Ptolemy, king of Egj^t, the brother of Cleopatra, who expelled that princess, assassinated Pompey, was defeated and slain by Julius Caesar, a.c. 42. ACHILLES,(Alexander,1584— 1675,) a Russian noble, who imdertook an em- bassy to Persia ; wrote on the causes of earthquakes, &:c. ACHILLES TATIUS, or STATIUS. Respecting this writer, who is best known by the Greek romance of Leucippe and Clitophon, Suidas tells us that he was born at Alexandria, and after his conver- sion to Christianity, became a bishop ; that he -wrote on the sphere, and on ety- mology, and was the author of a miscel- laneous history of many great and wonderfiU characters. But as Photius (Biblioth. cod. 73), who states that Helio- dorus, the WTiter of another Greek novel, obtained a mitre after giving up his pre- vious pagan creed, is silent upon the similar tradition relating to Achilles Ta- tius, some doubts have been thrown upon the accuracy of the account given by ACH ACH Suldas ; and equally suspected is the story of his being the author of the treatise on the sphere ; to which an allusion is made byFirmicus, iv. 10, and of which it is thought that a portion exists in the Isagoge to the Phaenomena of Aratus. If Suidas, however, correctly assigns the two works to the same indi- vidual, it is evident that Achilles Tatius was anterior to Heliodorus, who flourished at the end of the fourth century. On the other hand, Huet (Origine des Romains, p. 75), Bourdelot (on Heliodor. p. 18), Coray (on Heliodor. pref. p. xiii.), Chai-din de la Rochette (Melanges, ii, p. 20), Schneider (on Anacreon, p. 240), Manso (Vermische Schriften, ii. p. 297), and Passow (Encycloped. i. p. 304), all agree in considering Heliodorus to be the older writer ; while Monnoye (in Menagian. iii. p. 118) and Ast (in his re- view of a German translation of the Greek original, p. 72) conceive — the former from the subject and the latter from the style — that Achilles Tatius was the predecessor of Heliodorus ; an idea which is partially confirmed by the chro- nological order in which all the Erotic writers are mentioned by Photius (cod. 166). Besides, from the allusion to the fable of jEsop, in ii. 23, and the rhetorical amplification of it according to the prac- tice of other sophists, nothing similar to which is found in Heliodorus, it may be inferred that the author lived at a time when the fables of the past were inter- woven with the fictions of the day, and not a time when that system had fallen into desuetude. Be this, however, as it may, it is clear that the romance is quoted under the title of Leucippe, by S. Maxi- mus Confessor, and by Pseud-Eustathius of Antioch ; by the aid of whose com- mentary on the Hexaemeron, Jacobs has been able to supply a lacuna in one pas- sage, and to correct an eiTor in another. The greater part of the novel first ap- peared in a Latin translation by Annibal Cruceius (de la Croce), Lugd. 1.544, and afterwards in the second and fuller edi- tion of Basle, 1554 ; having in the interval been translated by Coccius at Venice, 1550, from a more complete MS. which is probably now in the library of St. Mark. The original Greek was first printed by Commeiine, at Heidelberg, 1601, from a Palatine MS. whose defects were first supplied by Salmasius from two Codices Regii — one in the royal library at Paris, and the other formerly in the royal library at St. James's, but at present in the British Museum. To Salmasius 75 succeeded Boden, whose edition (see Jacobs, Praef. p. Ivii.) little deserves the name " ed. opt. ; " a title to which the edition by Jacobs, Lips. 1821, can alone lay the least claim. This ro- mance has been translated into English, German, and French. Of the French versions, the last (in 1733) was done by Adrien du Peron de Castera, and was reprinted at Paris in 1 803, but with such a change in the title and in the name of the characters, as to prevent aU suspicion of its being merely the resuscitation of a forgotten work. It was called Le Nouvel Antenor, ou Voyage et Aventures de Thrasybule en Grece : ou^Tage pouvant faire suite aux Voyages d'Antenor par Lantier, Paris, 1803; and though a part of the preface of Castera is preserved, no other change is made but of Clitophon into Thrasybidus, and of Leucippe into ACHILLINI. Three ItaUans of this name are mentioned by Tiraboschi. 1. Alexander, a native of Bologna, (1463 — 1512,) a physician and philoso- pher, who professed at Padua and Bo- logna. He wrote De Humani Corporis Anatomica, Annotationes Anatomies, De Universalibus, and other subjects of ana- tomy and metaphysics. He is said to have made some usefid discoveries in anatomy, especially that of the small bones of the ear. 2. GiaDJiloteo, a yoimger brother of the preceding, (1466 — 1538,) applied himself to Greek, Latin, theology, phi- losophy, music, antiquities, jurisprudence, poetry, &c. ; and, as may be inferred, succeeded in nothing. His poetry is the only thing remembered, and it is below mediocrity. (Tiraboschi, vi. 840.) He wrote also some remarks on Italian : An- notazioni della Lingua Volgare, 8vo. Bologna, 1536, — to the disparagement of Tuscan, and the praise of Bolognese, which he had used in his poems. But this lat- ter, notwithstanding, is one of the very worst dialects in Italy. 3. Claudia or Clodio, (1574—1640,) grandson of the preceding, professed jurisprudence at Bologna, Fenrara, and Parma, and wrote some bad poetry in the vulgar tongue. His Latin epistles are a little better, or rather not quite so bad. He received from cardinal Riche- lieu a gold chain or collar worth 1000 crowns, for some verses on the birth of the Dauphin ; and not, as is sometimes as- serted, for the famous sonnet beginning " Sudate o fiiochi, a pi-eparar metalli ;" and which was parodied by Crudeli in one ACH ACH beginning " Sudate o forni, a preparar pagnotte," &c. (Sweat, O ye ovens! in preparing cakes !) It must be only a slip of the pen in Arteaga (which Tira- boschi corrects), when he speaks of Louis XIV. rewarding him like a prince ! Louis XIV. was not three years old when Claudio died. i ACHMET. The Mohammedan world rejoices in some hundreds of personages who have borne this name. 1. Achmet hen Seiriur, who flourished early in the niiath century of our era, wrote in Arabic on the interpretation of dreams. The original is lost, but we have a Greek and Latin translation of it ad calcem Artemidori, 4to, Paris, 1G03. 2. Achmet, eldest son of Bajazet II., in whose favour he was preparing to abdi- cate, when his second son, Selim, defeated and slew him, and was proclaimed sultan. Achmet marched against the usurper, but was also defeated and put to death by Selim, a. d. 1512. 3. Achmet I. sultan of Constantinople, (1603—1617,) third son of Mahomet III. succeeded at a very early age. He was a mild, quiet, humane ruler, more attached to luxury than to war ; yet he fought against the Austrians and Shah Abbas of Persia, not indeed with much glory or advantage, but so as to preserve the integrity of his dominions. 4. Achmet II. sultan, succeeded his brother Soliman III. in 1691. His short reign was disastrous : Kinperli, his grand vizir, in a battle with the Imperialists, headed by prince Louis of Baden, lost 25,000 men, and a gi-eat treasure. Fa- mine, earthquake, and the plague, added to the universal discontent, and alarmed Achmet in the recesses of his harem. In four years after his accession, he died of the sickness produced by sorrow. 5. Achmet III. son of Mahomet IV. and nephew of the preceding, ascended the Turkish throne on the deposition of Mustafa II. in 1703. This is the mo- narch who received Charles XII. with so much hospitality. Eveiy reader knows in what manner he was brought into the war with Peter the Great, and how in- gloriously it was conducted. He was also imfortunate against the Imperialists : he lost Temeswar, Orsova, Belgrade, Servia, and a portion of Wallachia. But he took the Morea from the Venetians, and triumphed over the Persians. Yet his successes could avail him little against the intrigues of the seraglio : in 1730 he was hiu"led from the throne to a prison, and his nephew Mahomet I. from the 76 prison to the throne. He was the third sultan who in half a century thus ex- changed the palace for the dungeon. He survived his misfortune about six years, and died of apoplexy. 6. Achmet, dey of Algiers from 1805 to 1808, was a man of ferocious cha- racter. After killing some hundreds, he was killed in his turn by his own soldiers. 7. Achmet Basha, the Turkish com- mander who in 1522 reduced the island of Rhodes, so gallantly defended by the knights of St. John. But the merits of this service were soon counterbalanced by his rebellion : he failed, and his head was sent to Constantinople. 8. Achmet, surnamed Giedic, or Break- tooth, (d. about 1482,) the vizir of Maho- met II. was much engaged in war with the Genoese, the Neapolitans, and the Persians. This was one of the greatest ministers that ever conducted the affairs of a nation. What we most admire in him is the honest freedom with which he condemned the military con- duct of Bajazet, son of Mahomet, and heir of the monarchy, diu-ing an expe- chtion against Persia. " I will one day punish thee !" replied the angry prince. " What wilt thou do ?" demanded the aged warrior ; " I swear by my father's soul that I will never di'aw sword in thy service!" On the death of the sviltan, when Bajazet succeeded, there was a grand review of the troops, and Achmet appeared at the head of the Spahis, with his sword fastened to the pommel of his saddle. There was, on this occasion, something in the behaviour of Bajazet nobler than even that which is recorded of our Henry V. " Father !" cried he, as he approached the haughty veteran, " dost thou still remember the faidts of ray youth ? Resume thy scimitar, and with it strike my enemies as valiantly as before !" Achmet obeyed, and was as usefid as ever to the monarch and the country. In 1482, however, he severely condemned the treaty which Bajazet had just made with the knights of Rhodes ; by his angry master he was thrown into prison ; but the army rose, marched to the palace, and swore that the sultan's head should answer for that of their aged favourite. He was consequently en- larged ; he foxmd excuses for his master, and brought the people back to their obedience ; but he could not appease Bajazet, who caused him to be privately assassinated. 9. Achmet Pacha was chosen vizir ACH A CO after the murder of Mustafa, heir to the throne, by his own father, Soliman I. He was too honest a man to be the tool of Roxalana, the favoui-ite wife of the sultan, who had counselled the death of the prince that her own issue might ascend the throne of Othman. He fell the victim of his own fidelity and of her wiles, in 1554. ACHTSCHELLING, ( Lucas, ) a painter, born at Bruxelles in 1570. He is chiefly remarkable for his landscapes, of which there are three in the church of St. Gudule, at Bruxelles. ACIDALIUS, (Valens, 1567—1595,) a native of Wistoch, in the mark of Brandenburg, wrote Latin poetry of no great merit, but was much esteemed for his Commentaries on Paterculus, Quintus Curtius, Plautiis, &c. Had he lived to the ordinary age of man, he would, as Lipsius declared, have been one of the pearls of Germany. ACILIUS GLABRIO, (Manius,) in the second century before Christ, be- longed to a family which, though ple- beian, had filled some of the highest posts in the republic. As consul with Scipio Nasica, and general of the Roman forces against Antiochus, king of Syria, he raised himself high in the opinion of the world. He defeated that king, subdued Thrace, Etolia, and Phocis, and returned to Rome, where a triiunph awaited him. Another Roman of this name was consul in a. d. 91, conjointly with Trajan, who was afterwards emperor. As he was of great strength and great activity, he was commanded by Domitian to descend into the arena and fight a huge lion. He slew the animal, and was greeted with so much applause, that he roused the jea- lousy of the emperor, who first banished, and then put him to death on some frivo- lous pretext. How wide the contrast between the age of the first and that of the second Glabrio ! ACINDYNUS, (Septimus,) was con- sul with Valerius Procidus a. u. c. 340. He was governor of Antioch when a cir- cumstance occurred which has occupied the attention of biogi'aphers more than it ought. A man being ordered by him to pay a pound of gold into the pubHc treasury, was unable to comply, and was thrown into prison. To release him, with his own sanction, his wife listened to the persuasions of a rich man ; but the rich man filled her purse with earth in- stead of gold. He discovered the fraud to Acindynus ; and he, justly condem- ning himself for a rigour wliich had led 77 to the crime, paid the gold himself, and gave her the field from which the earth had been brought. It has been asserted by Bayle and others, that St. Augustine, who relates this anecdote, approves the conduct of the woman : the zealous Roman Catholics have defended their idol ; but the truth seems to be, that he neither applauds nor condemns her. ACKERMAN, (Conrad, d. 1771,) a celebrated actor, whom the Germans, especially the people of Hamburg, regard with as much veneration as we do Gar- rick, or the French their Talma. ACKERMAN, (J. C. G. 1756— ISOl,) professor of medicine at Altdorf, wrote on his profession, and very abundantly on the lives of the ancient Greek phy- sicians. These lives (Hippocrates, Galen, Theophrastus, Dioscorides, Aretteus, and Rufus of Ephesus) appeared in the edi- tion of the Bibliotheca Grosca of Fabri- cius, by Harles. His other works were — 1 . Institutiones Historiae Medicinse ; Nu- remberg, 1792, 8vo. 2. Manual of Mili- tary Medicine ; 2 vols. 8vo. Leipz. 1794-5 ; and 3. The Life of J. C. Dippel. The last two in German. ACKLAND, (Major,) a British officer, who was wounded and taken prisoner at the action mth the Americans, near Still- water, in 1777. His wife, Lady Harriet Ackland, sought him in the American camp ; and after his death in a duel, she married Mr. Brudenell, who had accom- panied her in her perilous pursuit of her husband from the camp at Saratoga. (American Biog. Diet.) ACKWORTH, (George,) an English divine and civilian of the sixteenth cen- tury, who enjoyed considerable prefer- ment in the English church, until his dissipated conduct forced him to resign it. He wrote against the Romanists, probably at the instigation of his patron, archbishop Parker. ACLAND, (Anthony,) an English Jesuit, probably a native of Devonshire. In 1623 he resided at Rome, and was associated with F. William Risdon, the procurator there. He died there in 1626. ACOLUTH, (Andrew, 1654—1704,) a native of Bemstadt, and professor of theology at Breslaw, was an excellent oriental scholar. He published a speci- men of the Koran in four languages, and of Obadiah in Armenian and Latin. The first of these is very scarce. Its title is Teti-apla Alcoranica ; sive Specimen Al- corani quadi'ilinguis Arabici, Persici, Turcici, et Latini ; Berlin, 1701, fol. For the second work, Obadias Armenus aCO A C O et Latinus cum Annotationibiis, (Leipz. 1680, 4to.) he had a fount of Armenian t)rpe prepared ; but it is said to be an incorrect work. ACOMAT, a prince of Esclavonia, ■who left his father's house, hastened to Constantinople, and became Mussulman, because that father had forcibly married the lady to whom he was betrothed. By Bajazet II. he was favom-ably re- ceived, and he had the honour of mar- rying a daughter of that monarch. He accompanied liis father-in-law in the war against Venice, and showed that, what- ever his profession, he was stiU the friend of the Christians. He it was who in- clined the sultan to peace, and who procured for John Lascaris, the agent of Lorenzo de Medicis, permission to ran- sack the libraries of Greece. ACOMINATUS. See Nicetas. ACONCIO, (Giacomo,) an Italian phi- losopher of the sixteenth century. He embraced the opinions of Calvin ; and to escape the intolerance of the church he had quitted, came to England, where he was pensioned by Elizabeth. To please his patroness, he wrote a book which should both advocate her notions in regard to the eucharist, and yet not dis- please the Calvinists — which should com- bine both the essence and the figure — which should defend the docti'ine of con- substantiation, or at least something very like it. As a christian philosopher, lie doubtless %vished to reconcile even the Roman Catholics with the ultra-reform- ers ; but he should have reflected that, so long as the former insisted on an en- tire change of substance, and the latter on no change at all, either visible or spiri- tual, he was attempting a hopeless thing. But he went farther : reducing the essen- tials of Christianity to a very few dogmas, he endeavoured to show that all rehgions might be united — that even paganism might be conciliated ^vith the worship of the true God. His laxity procured him enemies. — He wrote on the study of the arts, and on the defence of fortified places. It was in his character of engi- neer, not in that of religious polemic, that the queen rewarded him. He was a member of the Dutch church in Austin Friars in 1560, and, together with Ha- drian Hamstedius, was involved in a censure of excommunication issued by Grindall (then bishop of London), for Anabaptist and Arian principles. He wrote a long letter of remonstrance to the Dutch chmxh on this occasion, which is still in their library. His work, De 78' methodo sive recta investigandarum tra- dendarumque artium ac scientiarum ra- tione libellus, (Basle, 1558,) has been often reprinted, although eclipsed and superseded by that of Descartes ; and is inserted in the Utrecht collection De Studiis bene institiiendis. Tiraboschi praises its style very highly. There is some dispute as to the fact, whether his work on the Fortification of Places, (Ars muniendorum oppidorum, Latin and Italian, Geneva, 1585,) mentioned by Mazzuchelli, was ever printed. Chaufe- pie denies it, and Tiraboschi Avas un- able to see a copy of it. See Tiraboschi, vii. 375, 474, 555. (Biog, Univ. Chal- mers, &c.) ACORIS, a king of Egypt in the fourth century before Christ, was always hostile to Persia. He aided Evagrius of Cyprus in the war which that king undertook against Artaxerxes Mnemon. He placed Chalcias the Athenian over the troops which he had raised for a Avar with the great king, but he died before he could come into immediate contact with that potentate. AGOSTA. Portugal rejoices in several persons of this name, which was orignally written Da Costa. 1. Christopher, who was born in Africa, and who, in the 16th century, after tra- velling much, settled at Biu-gos, where he published a ti'eatise on East India drugs. 2. Josef, Avho, though born at Me- dina del Campo, was of Portuguese ex- traction. At an early age, he entered into the order of Jesuits, professed theology at Ocaiia, and in 1572 went to Peru, of which he became the pro- vincial. Returning to Europe in 1588, he won the favour of Philip II. From the court of Philip he repaired to Rome, and was sent back by the general of his order, Aquaviva, as visitor of Arragon and Andalusia. But he had many disputes with his superiors ; the Jesuits were then, as in more recent times, much divided ; and more than once he was compelled to live within the walls of his monastery. He died in 1600. He wrote — 1. Historia Natural y Moral de los Indias ; a work much followed by Robertson. 2. De Natura Novi Orbis. 3. De Promulgatione Evangelii apud Barbaros ; and some other treatises of less importance. 3. Mamiel, (1541—1604,) a Jesuit of Lisbon, rector of Braga, then missionary to the Azores ; was distinguished by his zeal. He wrote a History of the Jesuit Missionaries to the East. I 1 AGO A CR 4. Uriel, a gentleman of Oporto, sprung from a Jewish family, and born towards the close of the sixteenth century. His opinions and adventiu-es gave him a me- lancholy notoriety. Though educated for the Roman-catholic church, and long a zealous observer of her worship, he began to suspect that his forefathers were wiser than he, and that he ought to return to the Jewish religion. Lea\dng Portugal, therefore, he went to Holland, where he became an Israelite. This step he soon repented ; he found his new co-religion- ists not a fraction less intolerant than his old ones ; and because he ventured to dis- pute what the rabbis had delivered, he was solemnly excommunicated. His next step was still more criminal ; it was to assail the immortality of the soul; in other words, to proclaim himself a Sadducee. His book caused a great sensation : it was laid before the tri1)unals of Amsterdam, and he was imprisoned. But he had not yet reached the summit of his unbelief; in a few years he discovered that the law of Moses was no revelation, that it was purely the invention of men ; and that all religion was knavery. A confirmed infidel, he now became reconciled with the Jews, and was re-admitted to their communion. But in a short year they discovered his laxity, his indifference, his contempt of them, and they again excommimicated him. At the end of seven years he re- solved to commit suicide, but not until he had mm'dered one of his kinsmen who had been his most bitter enemj'. He failed in his attack on his kinsman, and immediately destroyed himself. — His life affords a good moral lesson for men who confide in their own powers of reason. 5. Joam, who, though born in Bengal, (1775,) was of Portuguese ex- traction. Having studied at Paris, he retiuned to India, and applied himself to literature and commerce. He was connected with two periodicals, one of which, The Calcutta Magazine, failed ; but The Calcutta Times, of which he was a large proprietor and sole editor, an- swered his expectation. In both he en- deavoured to explain the interests of com- merce, and the character of the natives. ACQUAVIVA, (M. 1456 — 1528,) a Neapolitan nobleman, distinguished himself as a partisan of the French. By Gonsalvo, of Cordova, he was made prisoner and earned into Spain; but his confinement was not long, and on liis return to Naples he became the patron of letters. To literary men he was indeed a benefactor : hence the 79 encomia which have been lavished upon him, and which, more than any merit of his own, obtained him distinction. Yet he -\vi-ote one book at least, — a commen- tary on the Latin translation of Plu- tarch's Morals. ACQUAVIVA, (Belisario,) younger brother of the preceding, took the opposite side in poKtics, and was a steadfast adhe- rent of the Spaniards ; hence he was enabled, not only to preserve his own patrimony, but to procure the restitution of his brother's. Like that brother, he applied himself to letters, and left several dissertations, collected since into 1 vol. Of this illustrious name were several other members attached to literature. Two dukes of Atri were tolerable poets : according to Crescimbeni they were more than tolerable ; but we must always dis- trust the judgment of one Italian when he speaks of another. See Auuaviva. ACREL, (Olaf, d. 1807,) a surgeon and physician of Stockholm, the oracle of his comiti-ymen ; who had perfected his knowledge by study in foreign countries, and who introduced many improvements into Swedish practice. His discoiu-se on the Reforms necessary in Siu-gical Opera- tions made a deep impression. So did his other works, On the Mode of Treating Recent Wounds — On Surgery in general - — On the Cataract of the Eye. His honours equalled his success. ACRON, the son of Xenon, was bom at Agrigentmn ; and opened, in company with Empedocles, a medical and philoso- phical school at Athens. During the plague, described by Thucydides, he re- commended, says Plutarch, (De Isid. ii. p. 383, D.) the practice of fumigations to cm-e the infection supposed to be in the air. But when the chronicler of Chceronaea adds, that many were benefited by it, he states what is distinctly denied by Thucydides, who testifies to the in- efficacy of all the means to which the medical men had recourse. A similar practice was recommended, says Galen, (torn. xiii. p. 955, B. ed. Charter,) by Hippocrates ; and hence he has been thought to have got the idea from liis pre- decessor, who wrote a work on medicine in the Doric dialect, one book of which was on the diet of persons in health,— on the principle, probably, that prevention is better than ciu-e. Acron was also one of those who noticed the phenomena of winds, from finding, it may be presumed, that certain winds brought with them certain disorders. Pliny (H. N. xxix. 1) considers him as the first of the Em- A CR ACT p'lrics, or Experimentalists. But tliis has been considered an error on the part of the Roman natm-alist ; for the sect alhided to did not arise till 200 years after the time of Acron. On his return to his native country, the physician asked the senate for a spot of ground where he might build a family tomb. The request was refused at the suggestion of Empe- docleSjWho conceived that such a grant for such a purpose would interfere with the principle of equality he was anxious to establish at Agrigentum. As the epitaph, said to be written by Simonides, on Acron is probably the most complete jeu de mots on record, and therefore defies all ti-anslation, we wiU ventiire to give it in the original, — AKpov n]rpov AKpav AKpayavTivov Trarpos aKpov A/cpo- TaTqs Kopv(f)T]s TVfxlSos aKpos Karexei- ACRON HELENIUS. Nothing is known of this person, except as one of the earliest existing commentators on Horace. Although he is quoted by Porphp-io on Horace, (Sat. i. 8. 25,) and Poi-phyrio byPriscian, (2,) and Charisius, (p. 196,) yet, as the period when Por- phyrio lived is equally unknown, Sm-in- gar (Histor. Crit. Scholiast. Latin, iii. p. 29.) confesses his inability to decide upon the age of Aero. A part of the Scholia have been printed, but other portions are in MSS. and are likely to remain so, as they are of little value : such at least is the opinion of Manso, (Horat. Vit. Chronolog. p. 86.) On the other hand, Suringar (p. 41) does not hesitate to contend that Acron has been of great service for the interpreta- tion of Horace, and such is likewise the opinion of Janus ; while H. Stephens (Diatrib. de edit. Horat. p. 56,) Waddel, (Animadvers. p. 45,) Bentley, (Terent. Andr. iii. 2. 49,) and Garatoni, (Ciceron. pro Coelio. ii. 2,) have aU been able to elicit some good readings from Aero and Porphyrio, not to be obtained elsewhere. Some critics have attributed to Aero the Schol. on Pers. (Schoell. Hist. Lit. iii. 26.) ACRON, or ACRONIUS, (John, 1520 — 1564,) a physician and mathematician of Friesland, wrote on his profession and also on astronomy. ACROPOLITE, (George, 1220 — 1282,) was one of the Greek nobles sent by his imperial master to negotiate a union between the chmxhes of the east and west. Though at the council of Lyons (1274) he abjm-ed schism, and subscribed to the unity of the cluu-ch, the act was not sanctioned by Michael Paleologus, and the chmxhes remained 80 disimited as before. He -wrote a chro- nicle of Constantinople, or rather of the empire, from the occupation of that city by the Latin monarchs, to its recon- quest in 1260 by the Greek emperor. This has been printed in the Corpus Hist. Byzant. ; but his theological works will rest in MS. ACROPOLITE, (Constantine,) son of the preceding, was also a minister of Pa- leologus, until he was disgraced. Under Andi-onicus, however, he was again in favour. Like his father, too, he wrote much on theology (a queer employment for a minister of state), especially on the more recondite docti'ines, such as the procession of the Holy Ghost. In com- piling lives of saints he was more usefully employed : that of St. John Damascenus is in the huge collection of Bollandus. ACROTATUS, eldest son of Cleome- nes II., king of Sparta, of the venerated family of the Heraclidfe, flourished, or rather disgraced himself, in the 4th cen- tury before Christ. His feeble conduct at home and at Agrigentum, his base murder of Sosisti-atus, and his death in battle against the tyi-ant of Megalopolis are known to all classical readers. A gi'andson of the preceding ascended the throne of Sparta, a.c. 268. In his youth he had distinguished himself against Pyrrhus ; a year after his acces- sion he was slain in battle. ACSENCAR, (Cassim Ed.) chief of the Atabecs of Mussul, was one of the great officers of Melik Shah, in the 11th century. In 1084 he subjugated Diar- bekir for his royal master, and was re- warded with the government of Aleppo. Ten years afterwards he fell in battle against the prince of Damascus. ACSENCAR-AL-BURSKI, caUed by the writers of the Crusades, Borsequin, Borgel, Borso, &c., was another great officer of Mehk Shah. In 1086 he was employed in Asia Minoi-, to re- duce the emirs, who after the death of Soliman had proclaimed their indepen- dence. As governor of Bagdat and Mussul, as general of the armies of Mo- hammed and Mahmud, he was often in action against the crusaders, with vari- ous success. In 1124 he was assassin- ated by the Ismalians. ACTISANES, king of Ethiopia, who assisted the Egyptians to dethrone their own tyrannical king, Amenophis. To record his success, they elected him king of Egypt. At the head of two great nations, he distinguished himself by his love of justice, by his enlightened admi- I ACT ACT nistration, by his zeal for the comfoi-t of his people. He cleared the country of robbers, by amputating their noses and exiling them to a city of the desert be- tween Egypt and Palestine. On his death, he would not nominate a suc- cessor, but left the choice to the Egyp- tians. ACTO, or ATTO, bishop of Vercelli, a learned theologian and canonist, was the son of Count Aldegar, and born in Piedmont, early in the tenth century. In 945 he was raised to the see of Ver- celli. His learning, his piety, his mild- ness of character, well deserved the honour, though they had less influence over his elevation than his noble birth and his favour with princes. His writ- ings evince his intimate acquaintance with Scripture and ecclesiastical disci- pline. His works have been collected by Baronzio, (2 vols. fol. Vercelli, 1768.) ACTON, (Edward,) a captain in the British navy, distinguished for services rendered to his country in the reign of Anne. In Rook's vigorous and intrepid attack of Gibraltar, he commanded the Kingston, one of the battle-ships which had been brought to bear against that formidable fortress. Under the same enterprising and successful chief, he took part in the battle of Malaga ; but in this encounter, as well as in that of the pre- ceding, aspersions had been cast upon his conduct. Indeed, in those days, no less than in later times, calumny but too often succeeded in detracting from the merits of the brave. Fortunately, however, for Acton, and others who underwent the same ordeal, the eqiutable decision of a court martial silenced slander and exposed the fabrications of an envious faction.* Of every charge which had been alleged against him, he was fully and honom'ably acquitted. The circumstances which gave rise to rumours of Acton's backwardness in battle, ought to be recorded if only to show with what semblance of tnith malice may tell its tale. It would seem that in cannonading the town and the lower-forts of Gibraltar, the Kingston s guns were so rapidly served, that Acton's shot had been all expended before the batteries had been silenced, and the landing efiected : and, in this dilemma, for want of ammunition, he was reluctantly compelled to quit the line. Nor in his second encounter (not- withstanding sixty-three of his crew had fallen in fight,) were his endeavours to • A political party •which sought to disparage the achievements of Rook. VOL, I. 81 renew action, thwarted as they were \>y light airs, baffling winds, and other an- noyances incidental to naval warfare, the less subject to the animadversions of the fire-side fighters and battle commenta- tors* of the time. But Acton, to employ a professional phrase, was not to be " shelved" by the shafts of malice. His services were again sought, and again put in requisition. He was appointed to the Grafton, (60,) and in this ship was entrusted to him the discharge of duties which required something more than the mere acquisition of nautical knowledge. On his return from foreign service, he was selected, in conjunction with commodore Wyld of the Royal Oak, to convey to a certain latitude the mer- chant ships assembled in the Downs, bomid to Lisbon and the West India isles. On the 1st of May, 1707, the convoy weighed and set sail ; and, on the following day, ere the sternmost ships of the fleet had well brought abreast the land of Dungeness, the Dun- kirk squadron, consisting of ten sail of the line and four smaller vessels, was suddenly descried breaking through the morning mist. Complying with the signal to disperse, the British merchant vessels were seen pressing sail, and shaping separate courses, to distract the pursuit of the frigates of the French ; whilst the Count De Forbin, the French admiral, cautiously attacked the Grafton and the Royal Oak with his largest and most powerful ships of the line. For a con- siderable time, the Grafton was seen en- veloped in a cloud of smoke, gallantly retiurning the galling fire of the enemy's ovei-whelming force. Still Acton sus- tained a protracted struggle ; nor until he was himself slain, and a considerable por- tion of his crew killed and wounded, was his shattered ship surrendered to the foe. ACTON, (Joseph, 1737 — 1808,) prime minister of Naples, was of a good Irish family settled at Besanfon. The son of a physician, he had all the means of acquiring knowledge, but he made little use of them. As he was too ignorant for the learned profes- sions, he went to sea, and obtained the command of a frigate from Leopold, grand duke of Tuscany. In this ca- pacity he accompanied an expedition of Charles III. against the Moors, and had the glory to save three or four thousand Neapolitans and Spaniards, whom the inexperience of the com.mander had placed in great jeopardy. For this • Such writers as Bishop Burnet. G ACT AC U courageous act he was employed in the service of Naples, first as minister of marine, and next of war. Feeling a very deeply rooted aversion for France he was ready to embarrass that power in every shape. In a few years he succeeded to the post of prime mi- nister. In 1792, seeing the capital menaced by the French, he was obliged to make peace with them ; but in the following years he caused them trouble enough. After the defeat of Mack, how- ever, French ascendancy prevailed, and he was dismissed into private life. By his French biographers, who detest his memory, he is made much worse than he really was. If he was afraid of as- sassination, and frequently changed his bed-chamber, it was from fear of the French quite as much as of the Neapo- litans. Avarice seems to have been his greatest defect. ACTON, (Thomas,) an English Jesuit, whose real name was Dupuy, was born A.D. 1662. He joined the society Nov. 25, 1684. In 1701 he resided at the college of Liege, as prefect of the spirit. In l704 he was a missionary in the col- lege of St. Thomas of Canterbury ; and died at St. Omer, March 21, 1721. ACTUARIUS, a Greek physician, who lived some time between the ele- venth and fourteenth centimes, and who wrote several books on medicinal sub- jects. Some of them have been trans- lated into Latin, and published in the sixteenth century. ACUNA. Spain has produced many distinguished men of this name. 1. Antonio Osorio de, was bishop of Zamora, in the reigns of Fernando the Catholic and Charles V. He filled that see in 1519, when the civil war broke out in Spain. Instead of espousing the interests of the throne, he joined the communeros, or municipal insurgents, who had certainly many rights to vindi- cate, many wrongs to be redressed, but whose excesses were more fatal to the country than ages of tyranny would have been. It was not sympathy, however, for popular rights, that led Don Antonio to espouse the cause of the communities : it was ambition, which led him to aspire after the highest ecclesiastical dignities ; and envy, which made him long for re- venge on men who had been more for- tunate than himself. When he appeared at Tordesillas, the general rendezvous of the discontented deputies, he was re- ceived with enthusiasm : one of his ta- lents, of his station, of his influence, was 82 sure to be welcome. Being entrusted with ammunition and men, he marched against the royal generals, and was for the most part successful. In the view of iden- tifying religion with liberty, he raised a regiment of priests, whom he always conducted to battle ; and though 60 years of age, he was sure to be in the hottest scene of the action. " Follow me, my parsons !" was his \isual exhortation, as he plunged into the dense ranks of the enemy. By the Conde de Haro, the rebels were at length defeated ; but the priests stood firm ; and dreadful was the carnage which they produced among the royalists. One of the number slew eleven with his own hand. Before he sent forth the fatal ball, he gave his benediction to the intended victim ; and to give his blessing all due authority, he made with his musket the sign of the cross in the air — wliiz went the bidlet, and heaven had one inhabitant more ! When Toledo was besieged by the royal- ists, the bishop hastened to that city, not so much to assist Maria Pacheco in repell- ing the assailants, as to seize the vacant archbishopric. By the populace he was speedily proclaimed; and when the chapter refused to elect him, he and Maria committed the members to prison ; and the latter were compelled to live on bread and water until they had not only elected Don Antonio, but given up their treasures for the use of the insui'gents. After Juan de Padilla was made prisoner, (24th April, 1521,) the royalist cause became triumphant. The fortresses sub- mitted, and the bishop fled towards France. In Navarre, howevei", he was recognised, seized, and sent to the dun- geon of Simancas. There he broke the head of the alcalde with a brick, and was escaping, when the son of the officer dis- covered and secured him. This was his last crime. By a papal bull, he was de- graded, and delivered over to the secular arm. He was tried, sentenced, and be- headed in his prison. (Sandoval, Hist, del Emperador Carlos I.) 2. Fernando de, anative of Madrid early in the sixteenth century, was a favourite of Charles V., not only for his military, but for his literary talents. His ti-ans- lation of the well-knowm romance of Olivier de la Marche, under the title of El Cavallero Detenninado, was much esteemed by the emperor ; so indeed were his translations fi-om Ovid and Boyardo, and his Varias Poesias. As a pastoral poet he excelled. Such poetry has been long despised; but in the time ACU ADA of Fernando it was amazingly popular in England, Italy and Spain. This nobleman died at Granada in 1580. 3. Pedro de, governor of the Philippine islands mider Philip II. and a knight of Malta. He triumphed over the Dutch and native princes of the Malaccas, •which he subdued in 1605 and the fol- lowing year. But he had many rivals, who made poison the instrument of their baseness immediately after his return to his capital. He wrote an accomit of the insurrection of the Chinese at Ma- nilla. 4. Chr isiopher de, {1597 — 1676,) a native of Burgos, and a famous Jesuit mission- ary. Soon after his profession, he went to South America, and laboured at the conversion of the Penivians and Chilians. He was rewarded by high posts in the college of Cuen9a. In 1638, he was chosen by the covmcil of Lima to accom- X)any Texeiro, the Portuguese general, lo traverse the Amazon to its source, and open a communication through the interior between Pern and Brazil. But he had also a colleague, — Andres de Cortieda, theological professor ; and this circumstance woidd lead to the inference that missionary stations were expected to be opened in the interior of that vast continent. Having received the neces- sary instructions from the government of Quito, the flotilla sailed up the river, and did not reach Para before nine months had elapsed. In this celebrated voyage, father De Acuiia discovered many tribes previously unknown to Europeans, and of these a few were anthropophagi. There is, however, something of fable in the relation which in 1641 he published of this remarkable voyage, under the title Nuevo Descubrimiento del Gran Rio de los Amazones. But for this the good Jesuit is not accountable : he was deceived by report. After all, his work is as interesting as it is curious. The objects of this expedition were not at- tained : the troubles which long dis- tracted the Peninsula, owing to the separation of the Portuguese from the Spanish crown, left neither government time for colonizing. In a few years the missionary returned to Peru, where he ended his days. ACUSILAUS. The son of Caba, or Scabra, according to Diog. Laert. (i. 41,) was born at Cercas, or Cecas, says Eudo- cia, (Violar. p. 49,) in the coimtry of the Argives. He flourished as a Greek chronicler, a little anterior to the first Persian invasion, and wrote the genea- 83 logics of the principal families of Greece ; which it was reported, says Suidas, Ids father had found engi-aved on some brazen tablets, while he was digging in a part of his premises. His works were still extant in the time of Cicero, who describes his style as being simple and miornament- ed ; and they were preserved down to the time of the sophist Sabinus, who lived under Hadrian, and wrote a commentary upon them. Nor were they lost till after the time of Tzetzes, who quotes them on Lycophr. v. 177. It is more probable, however, that he got his information second-hand, either from Clemens Alex. (Strom, i. p. 321. A.) who is transcribed as usual by Eusebius, (Prasp. Evang. x. p. 498. D.) whom Syncellus has copied, (Chronograph, p. 64. B.) or else from Julius Aft-icanus, whom Eusebius follows, (P. E. X. p. 489. A.) or from ApoUodorus. From two passages in Suidas ('Icrropjj(rai and 2vyypa(f)(i)) it might be inferred that he wrote in verse, since what passed under liis name in prose was considered to be not genuine. On the other hand, Clemens, (Strom, xi. p. 453,) asserts that he merely put into prose what he foimd in the verse of Hesiod. But though he attached himself so closely to the Ascrean, yet he seems to have deserted his leader occasionally, as remarked by the Scholiast (on ApoU. Rh. iv. 828.) ApoUodonis, (ii. 2. 2; iii. 8. 1.) and Tzetzes (on Lycoph. 177.) Whatever is still remaining of his works have been collected by Stiu-z and appended to liis Pherecydis Fragmenta. Gerse. 1789. ADA, queen of Caria, married her own brother, after the manner of the Carians and the Egyptians. After the death of Artemisia she reigned seven years conjointly with him ; and after his death (a.c. 344) some years alone. Her youngest brother indeed, encouraged by Persia, aspired to the supreme authority ; but she found a grand defender in Alex- ander the Great, whom she adopted as her son and heir. ADAIR, (Jas. Makittrick, M.D., 1728 — 1802,) a native of Inverness, and son of James Makittrick, an officer in the army, who, having wasted his own fortvme, toge- ther with that of his wife, a descendant of the Adair family, idtimately became an officer in the revenue department at Edin- burgh. James, the subject of this notice, his yoimgest son, was educated at the grammar school and at the university of Edinburgh. He embraced physic as a profession, and was appointed surgeor' mate of the Porcupine sloop of war, bound G2 ADA AD A to the Leeward Islands. He remained, however, but a short time in this capacity, returned to England, and shortly after determined to proceed to Antigua, where he became assistant to a relative, at whose desire he had been bred to the medical profession. He also undertook the ma- nagement of an estate in this island, and made himself familiar with the condition of the slaves, for whose improvement he was exceedingly anxious, but to whose emancipation he was most decidedly opposed. On the subject of the abolition of slavery, lie published a tract in 1789, in which he endeavoured to depict the real state of slavery in the West Indies, and the probable consequences of the abolition of the slave trade ; to point out also some grievances of the slave, which required to be redressed, the means by which they might be relieved, and, he added, the necessary regidations of the hospital for the management of the sick. Humanity to slaves, and religious instnic- tion, he held to be the only securities upon which the West India planter could safely rely. His own conduct towards them was directed by every kindness. He protected, he nurtured them as he would his own children ; and they were all much attached to him. He was ex- amined on the Abolition question before the privy council. In a few years he quitted the West Indies, took a voyage to America, and made the acquaintance of Benjamin Franklin. After a tour in the United States, he returned to Edin- bui-gh, took his degree of M.D., and then settled as a physician at Andover, in Hampshire. On a short notice, and in obedience to a call of friendship, he re- turned to the West Indies. This was after tlie war with America had com- menced, and he was, upon his arrival, appointed physician to Monk's Hill and to the commander-in-chief and the troops, and also one of the assistant judges of the Courts of King's Bench and Common Pleas. At this time he adopted the name of Adair, having become the next male heir to the estate of his mother's family. In 1 783 he left the West Indies, returned to England, and settled at Bath, where he became involved in many disputes with his professional brethren and otliers. These arose partly from his determined opposition to quacks and quackery : his attempts to expose and suppress quackery may be looked upon as quixotic, but they were not the less laudable. His temper was, however, altogether unfitted for the warfare which he thus drew upon him- 84 self; for he was naturally querulous, hot, and irascible, and his disposition had been soured by disappointments in do- mestic life. He was, however, a man of an affectionate nature, and endowed with lively sensibility. He was kind and ge- nerous to the poor, and the profits of the works he published were all given to the support of the Bath hospital. His pro- fessional acquirements were of no mean description, and he appears to have been a close and rational observer. He be- came hypochondriacal, and died at Har- rowgate in 1802. He published the fol- lowing works: — 1. Medical Cautions for the consideration of Invalids ; Bath, 1786, 8vo. Second edition, 1787. These specially relate to diet and regimen, and there is a table of the relative digestibility of foods ; also essays on fashionable dis- eases ; the dangerous effects of hot and crowded rooms ; an inquiry into the use of medicine during a course of mineral waters ; and on quacks, quack medicines, and lady doctors. 2. A Philosophical and Medical Sketch of the Natui-al His- tory of the Human Body and Mind ; Bath, 1787, 8vo. To this work is subjoined an Essay on the Difficidties of attain- ing Medical Knowledge. 3. Unanswer- able Arguments against the Abolition of the Slave Trade ; Bath, 1789, 8vo. 4. Essays on Fashionable Diseases ; Batli, 1790, 8vo. 5. Essay on a Non- descript, or Newly-invented Disease ; 1790, 8vo. He published some papers in the Medical Commentaries, especially one in vol. viii. on small-pox in the West Indies, and in vol. xvii. on the successfid use of cuprum vitriolatum and conium, in two cases of phthisis ; some strange memoirs relative to himself, &c., under the title of P. Paragraph and B. Goosequill ; and also some remarks on Philip Thicknesse, under the same title ; and two sermons addressed to sailors and slaves in the West Indies. ADAIR, (James,) seijeantatlaw, son of Mr. Adair, an army agent. Was entered of Peterhouse, Cambridge ; took the degree of B.A. 1764, M.A. 1767. He was edu- cated for the law, and in due course called to the bar by the society of Lin- coln's Inn, In the early part of the reign of George III. he was ranked among the advocates on the popular side; in 1771 he was employed as counsel in the famous case of the House of Commons against the printers ; and in this and other in- stances gave so much satisfaction to the citizens, that, on tlie death of Glynn, he was elected recorder. In 1774 he took ADA ADA the degree of Serjeant, and afterwards confined his practice chiefly to the Com- mon Pleas, in which court, — upon liis promotion to be a king's serjeant, — he for some years took the lead. On the rupture of the Whigs after the French revolution, he attached himself to the moderate party of Bm'ke's division ; and in 1794 was one of the counsel for the crown against Hardy, Tooke, and others, but had no very active part assigned him. In 1796 he led against the crown, with Erskine as his junior, in defence of Stone, accused of treason, but acquitted. At diiferent times he held a seat in par- liament, and at the time of his death was member for Higham Ferrers. He also was counsel to the Board of Ordnance, and Chief Justice of Chester. His man- ner as a speaker was somewhat coarse, but it was impressive ; he had great co- piousness and fluency of delivery, and his powers of reasoning were of the highest order. He died suddenly at his house in Lincoln's Inn-fields, on the 21st of July, 1798. He was author of several tracts: — 1. Thoughts on the Dismission of Officers for their Conduct in Parlia- ment; 1764. 2. Observations on the Power of Alienation in the Crown ; 1 768. 3. Discussions of the Law of Libels, 1785. ADAIR, (James,) a trader with the Indians of the southern states. He re- sided in their country forty years, begin- ning in 1735, and was almost entirely cut off from civilized society, and from the year 1 744 he resided chiefly among the Chickasaws. He published a very elaborate work on their manners, endea- vouring to prove them descended from the Jews. It is entitled The History of the American-Indians, particularly those Nations adjoining the Mississippi, East and West Florida, South Carolina, &:c. London, 4to. 1 775 ; but the work has been distrusted, although Dr. Boudinot, in his Star in the West, has adopted his views. (Allen's Dictionary.) ADALARD, or ADALHARD, abbot of Corbey, in Westphalia, (755—826,) was of royal exti'action, his father being Count Bernard, son of Charles Martel, the brother of Pepin, and the uncle of Charlemagne. In 772 he left the court, and assumed the habit in the monastery of Corbey, of which, after a short resi- dence at Monte Cassino, he was elected abbot. He was, however, removed from the cloister to be the chief minister of Pepin, king of Lombardy. The same dignity he filled under Bernard, the suc- cessor of Pepin ; but after the death of 85 Charlemagne he was disgraced, and with him all his family. In 821, however, he was restored to the government of his monastery. His life was written by his disciple, the celebrated Paschasius Rad- bertus, and may be found in the collec- tions of Bollandus and Mabillon. He wrote much ; but only one of his works, and that a compilation, — Statuta Anti- qua Abbatise Corbeyensis, — has de- scended to posterity, and is to be found in the Spicilegium of D'Acheri. There are, however, many fragments of his other works. ADALBERON, one of the most learned of the French prelates during the tenth century. He was the son of Geoffiy, count of Ardennes, and was at the same time archbishop of Rheims and chancellor of France, through the reigns of Lothaire, Louis V. and Hugh Capet, the latter of whom he consecrated king in 987. He died in the January of the fol- lowing year. His fame for learning threw lustre over the school of Rheims, at that time one of the most famous in Europe, and drew thither a great multitude of scholars. Few of his writings are pre- served, and those not of any importance. ADALBERON, sometimes called As- celin, or Azelin, a celebrated French prelate of the end of the tenth and be- ginning of the eleventh centuries. He was born in Lorraine, of a very rich family, and, about a. d. 970, pursued his stuches at Rheims, under the celebrated Gerbert, afterwards pope Sylvester II. Adalberon here made so great progress, that he was soon famous as one of the most learned men of his age. While stiU very young, in the year 977, he was made bishop of Laon ; after which he became as celebrated for the part he took in the politics of the time, as he had previously been for his proficiency in the sciences ; but his fame now was of a much more equivocal character. He was high in the favour of king Lothaire, as well as of Louis V. the last of the Carlovingian princes. After the death of this latter monarch, who left no chil- dren, Adalberon was deeply engaged in the intrigues and troubles connected with the rivalry between Hugh Capet and Charles duke of Lorraine, the natural son of Lothaire, who both laid claim to the succession. Adalberon had sworn fealty to Charles, as duke of LoiTaine, and was one of his counsellors ; yet he basely betrayedhim, along with his nephew Arniilf, bishop of Rheims, who had firmly sustainedhis cause, into the hands of Hugh ADA ADA Capet, and thus secured to the latter the quiet possession of the crown. The old historians are loud in their exclamations against Adalberon's treachery, and they sometimes speak of him as " the old traitor," ('vetulus ti'aditor,') and "the false-hearted bishop of Laon," (' falsus episcopus Lauduni.') Adalberon died about A. D. 1030. He was a great bene- factor to his church at Laon, which he enriched with a part of his own private property. He was the patron of Dudo de St. Quentin, the historian of the Nor- mans, whose history he revised before it was published. He has left various writings, not on the whole very nume- rous, and few of them printed, except some satirical Latin poetry, composed during the reign of king Robert, full of severe reflections and sarcasms on the politics of that reign, on the errors and corruptions of the state, and on his per- sonal enemies, which is given in the tenth volume of Dom Bouqviet's Collec- tion of the French Historians. ADALBERT, a famous impostor of the eighth century, who pretended to miracidous favours from heaven, and even to personal interviews with beings too holy to be mentioned. The confessors, saints, martyrs, nay even the apostles, he held to be much inferior to himself. The hairs of his head, the parings of his nails, were deserving of veneration. It would scarcely be credited that this man obtained consecration from the hands of bishops ; that multitudes followed him ; that the council of Soissons (744) was unable to crush his opinions ; and that a subsequent one was convoked at Rome by pope Za- charias to condemn them, — were not all these facts apparent from the acts of coun- cils, and from the epistles of St. Boniface, his contemporary. He probably died in prison. ADALBERT, duke of Tuscany, (847 — 890,) was the son of Boniface II. who had been despoiled of his fiefs by Lothaire I. The reign of Adalbert was long and successful. He took the part of Carlo- man against Charles the Bald, though the latter was supported by the pope ; and when the Roman coiu"t persisted in the interference, he marched to the eternal city, forced John VIII. to take refuge in the church of St. Peter, and the Roman citizens to swear fidelity to Carloman. Little effect on him had the excommuni- cation of pope John. ADALBERT II. son of the preceding, (890 — 917,) was much concerned in the troubles of Lombardy, when so many 86 princes were contending for the Avrecks of the Carlovingian empire. ADALBERT III. was associated with his father Berenger II. in the throne of Italy, A.D. 950 ; but it was a nominal rather than a real power which fell to the lot of the son. In 961, when Otho I. invaded Italy, and Adalbert marched to- wards the Adige with 60,000 men, the Italians refused to fight for Berenger : they would not oppose the German em- peror unless he abdicated in favoiu* of his son. Berenger was too fond of power to comply, and the army was immedi- ately disbanded. There was, conse- quently, no resistance to the imperial monarch. After this event, Adalbert found an asylum at Constantinople ; but from the year 988 he is lost to history. ADALBERT, marquis of Ivrea, mar- ried Gisela, daughter of Berenger I. marquis of Friidi ; and from this mar- riage sprang Berenger II. king of Italy. Ivrea was one of the most important fiefs of Italy ; it held the key of the Alps ; and from the advantage of this position, Adalbert was able successfully to oppose or to assist the designs of the French princes on Lombardy. But he was gene- rally opposed to his father-in-law Beren- ger I., and was consequently the ally of the Franks. By that king he was twice conquered, and twice pardoned. On the death of Gisela, he married Ermengard, daughter of Adalbert II. duke of Tus- cany, and her ambition led him to con- spire still more zealously against the ruin of Berenger. He died in 925, before the accomplishment of his wife's projects. ADALBERT, (St.) archbishop of Magdeburg, and the apostle of the Sla- vonic people, was at first designed (961) to preach the gospel in Russia. Being robbed and nearly murdered on the way, he returned to his imperial master, Otho I. who gave him the abbey of Weissenberg in Alsace. From this place he was nomi- nated to the archiepiscopal throne of Magdeburg, — an appointment confirmed by pope John XIII. (968), who added some privileges to the new see. In this station he founded several bishoprics, and had the satisfaction to see the profes- sion at least of Christianity daily spread among these barbarous people. He died in 981. ADALBERT, (St. 939—997,) bishop of Prague. This churchman, socelebrat- ed in the annals of Bohemia and of the em- pire, was a native of that Slavonic king- dom, which in his day was not reclaimed from idolatry. Dedicated from his infancy ADA ADA to the service of the altar, he was sent to prosecute his studies at Magdeburg, then one of the most flourishing scholastic institutions in Europe ; and on his return to Prague he became a priest. On the death of bishop Dithmar in 983, he was raised to the see of Prague. This dig- nity he little deserved : but he was of noble birth, and, in the eyes of the Bohe- mians, no less than of their duke Boleslas the Pious, this was merit enough. What is more extraordinary is the fact, that empire and pope confirmed the election. We may believe the biographers of Adal- bert, when they assvxre us that he ac- cepted the dignity with reluctance. The country was so inveterately attached to its paganism, that he could not hope to reclaim it. Then the dying confession of bishop Dithmar perpetually resounded in his ears. Dithmar, on the bed of death, felt quite sure he shoidd be damned. Why ? He was a very moral man ; he had learning and gravity enough, and he had, in the opinion of the world, done nothing to merit this self-condem- nation. But he felt that he had been sometimes remiss in the discharge of his duties ; that he had lacked zeal. If he had no vices, his people had enough for all the world together ; and he felt that he had not done what he should have done to refonn them. Adalbert was shocked at this confession ; he had a path of equal difficulty before him ; and if his eiForts were not more zealous, more suc- cessful, he too might one day despair of his salvation in the world to come. To do him justice, he laboured incessantly in his new office. He watched, prayed, admonished, taught, with exemplary di- ligence ; but he could not restrain his clergy from concubinage,nor the laity from frequent homicide, nor both fi'om di-un- kenness. In despair, the good bishop left liis flock, went to Rome — entered into the great establishment of Monte Casino — returned to Rome, and assumed the cowl in that of St. Alexis. His monastic life, we are told, was remarkable for its hu- mility. It was, however, a short one, for his flock soon claimed him, and received him with public honours. So auspicious was this commencement, that he fully calculated on more docility than he had yet found. He was soon undeceived : the people adhered to their former vices. A circumstance soon occurred which in- creased his disgust so much, that he again resolved to abandon his flock. A woman was taken in adultery, and, what was worse, with a clergyman. She fled to 87 the bishop, who, thinking that death was too severe a punishment for the offence, hid her among a community of nuns. She was discovered, however, was brought into the presence of the husband's kin- dred, and, despite all the bishop could do, was beheaded by the common exe- cutioner. Again he repaired to Rome, visited the emperor Otho, made several pilgrimages to the shrines of saints, and, on his return towards Bohemia, learned that all his kinsmen had been massacred in a church. The people, too, would not again receive him, because if he deserved the name of kinsman, he must seek re- venge for this deed of blood, Adalbert, therefore, repaired to Poland, resolved to end his days in missionary laboiu-s. The pagan Prussians seemed much in want of his zeal ; and accompanied by thirty Polish horsemen, whom the Polish duke Boleslas had given to him as an escort, he plvmged into that barbarous country. At Dantzic he converted many ; but in the rural districts, which he visited without his escort, he was less successful. While haranguing the people on an island in Pomerania, a barbarian struck him to the earth. The wound, however, was not a dangerous one ; and he was told to leave the country for ever ; for if he ventured to return, certain death should be his portion. But he had no intention to leave it : he merely retired to a house on the frontier, Avhere he remained until his beard and hair were grown so as to cover the shaven crown. He then laid aside his episcopal garments, and in the garb of the country he re-appeared amongst the pagans. He was probably not re- cognised, but his fate was not to be averted. He was one day discovered with other Christians — converts, no doubt — engaged in worship, and the spear of a pagan priest penetrated to his heart. On the same spot he was beheaded, and his head borne in ti-iumph on the top of a pole. Duke Boleslas redeemed both it and the trunk, and placed them where they might be venerated in relics. Thus perished the apostle of Pomerania — one who in the performance of his duty feared not stripes, or bonds, or death. (Cosma Pragensis, Vita S. Adalberti, apud Fre- herum ; Rerum Bohemicarum Scriptores.) ADALRIC, supposed to have been a son of Luther duke of Alemania, obtained from Childeric II. in 662 the duchy of Alsace, and the territory of Munster. In an historical biography like the present, he deserves mention as the progenitor of the great.house of Hapsburg, and of ite ADA ADA kindred branches in Lorraine and Baden. Nor should we forget that he was the father of St. Odila. This saint was born bhnd, and was so much hated by her father that he ordered her to be put to deatli. By the mother, however, a sister of St. Leger, she was saved, and brought up in a convent. In after years she reco- vered her sight, but many were elapsed before he would look upon her as his child. ■ At length he gave her the castle of Hohemberg, and there founded a nun- nery, of which she became the first abbess. Towards the close of his life, he too, with his duchess, embraced the re- ligious life, and died in 690. ADALVALD, king of Lombardy from the year 604, for some years conjointly with his father, but afterwards alone. By marrying a catholic princess, — Theodo- linda, daughter of Theudebert II., king of Austrasia, — he indisposed to his go- vernment his Arian subjects, who con- stituted three-fourths of the niunber. The zeal of his queen in behalf of ortho- doxy did notlessen the general discontent. At length he was deposed — ostensibly for the severity with which he punished some of his chief nobles — in reality for his openly favouring the Roman Catho- lics. He died in 625. ADAM OF BREMEN, so called be- cause he was a canon in the cathedral of that city, is well known to the ecclesias- tical students of the middle ages as a most useful and most interesting his- torian. His canonry he received in 1067 from the hands of Adalbert the arch- bishop ; and he was at the same time placed over the school dependent on that see — a school for the clergy much more than for the laity. In the exercise of these twofold functions, he passed his life ; but his leisure hours, at least, must have been devoted to the composition of his great work — Historia Ecclesiastica Ecclesiarum Hamburgensis et Bremen- sis, Vicinorumque Locorum, ab anno 788 ad an. 1072. (4to. Helmstadt, 1670.) The value of this book can be estimated by those only who know how little of these northern churches and countries was before known to Europe, — how little we should know if it were destroyed. It is as useful to the civil as to the ecclesi- astical historian. His materials, so far as the modern portion of his laboui-s were concerned, were derived from living witnesses — from actors in the scenes he relates ; for the times of St. Anscar, and of subsequent missionaries, he followed both tradition, and authorities which have long ceased to exist, but which then adorned the library of his school. Besides this history he wrote a Geogra- phical Description of the North, which is exceedingly precious to the histoi'ian of the middle ages. He also left a descrip- tion of Sweden, the more valuable, as Ohter and Wolfstan, whose narrative king Alfred inserted in his translation of Orosius, only described the coasts. In the two last works there are many fables ; but this defect was inevitable when tradition and rumour were the chief authorities for both history and geography. It is the duty of the critical reader to separate fable from truth. To Adam must also be attributed a biography of his patron Adalbert, which is of less value, though it is far from useless, (Fleury, Histoire Ecclesiastique, torn. xiii. I3iog. Univ. This article, however, is chiefly derived from original notes.) ADAM OF FULDA, a monk of Fran- conia in the fifteenth century. He wrote a treatise on Music. ADAM OF ST. VICTOR, canon regu- lar of that church at Paris (d. 1177); wrote some devotional treatises. ADAM DE LA HALLE, a cele- brated French poet of the thirteenth cen- tm-y. He flourished about the year 1260, and was the minstrel of the earl of Anjou. Little is known of his personal history ; but he is famous as the author of some of the earliest di'amatic poems in the French language, particulai-ly the elegant piece, entitled, Le Jeu de Robin et Marion, of which an excellent edition has been published at Paris by M. Mon- merque. He seems to have been a native of Arras, and was often charac- terized by the title of Le Bossu d'Arras ; but for what reason this name was given to him is not quite clear, for in one of his poems he distinctly declares that he was not deformed : — " Ne sai quel menestrel I'avoient depechie, Mais jou Adans d'Arras I'ai a point radreciiie, Et, pour cliou c'on ne soit de moi en daserie, On m'apele bochu, mais jc ne le sni mie." Jubiiial's Riitebeiif. (Paris, 1839.) t. i. p. 430. ADAM DE MARISCO, {of the Marsh,) a distinguished English scholar of the middle of the thirteenth centiu-y He was born in Somersetshire, but we are unacquainted with the date either of his birth or of his death. He studied at Oxford, where he soon gained great fame by his learning and acquirements, and he enrolled himself in the Franciscan order. In the schools of this order at Oxford he long professed philosophy ; and became the intimate friend of the famous Robert ADA AU A Grosseteste, bishop of Lincoln, and of Roger Bacon. The latter speaks rather disparagingly of his abilities, in one of his works. Grosseteste, at his death, from respect to Adam, left a great part of his books to the library of the Francis- cans in Oxford. In 1257, Adam was nominated by the king and the arch- bishop to the vacant bishopric of Ely, but the pope confirmed the choice of the monks who had previously elected Hugh de Balsham. Many of this writer's works are preserved in manuscript, and among others a collection of letters written by him to many of the most remarkable people of his age, such as the queen, the countess of Leicester, (the lady of the celebrated Simon de Montfort), Robert Grosseteste, &c., which contain numer- ous interesting allusions to contemporary history. There is a copy of these letters in a manuscript in the British Museum. ADAM OF MURIMOUTH, {Muri- midhensis,) an English historian of the fourteenth century. He was educated at Oxford, and was afterwards a canon of St. Paul's, in London. He was sent by Edward H. on a message to the pope and the king of Sicily ; and held at different periods many ecclesiastical pre- ferments. He appears to have died in the reign of Richard H. His histoiy commences near the beginning of the fourteenth century, and ends with the year 1380. It was printed at Oxford in 1 722 by Anthony Hall : and a small portion ■was edited by Thomas Hearne, who was ignorant of its author, and gave it anony- mously in the appendix to the History of Walter Hemingford, printed at Oxford in 1731. ADAM DU PETIT PONT, one of the most celebrated professors of the university of Paris in the middle of the twelfth century. He was born in Eng- land, and seems to have repaired to the university of Paris while young. He studied there imder Mathieu d'Angers and Peter Lombard ; and was a zealous partizan of Aristotle, His school, where he taught, was situated near the Petit Pont, from which circumstance his con- temporaries commonly designated him by the name of Adam du Petit Pont. He here lectured chiefly on grammar, rhetoric, and dialectics ; and his lectures appear to have been attended by his countryman John of Salisbiu-y, who was ever afterwards his friend, and who men- tions him with respect in his works. Adam was afterwards made a canon of Notre Dame, and as such he professed theology 89 in the episcopal school of the diocese. He was one of the synod appointed under the presidence of pope Eugene III., to judge Gilbert de la Poiree. Adam was called home from Paris, in 1175 or 1176, to be made bishop of St. Asaph, and died in England in 1180. In the writings of his contemporaries, he is sometimes dis- tinguished by the epithet oi Peripateticus, on account of his attachment to the phi- losophy of Aristotle; and sometimes by that of Scholasticus, ADAM SCOTUS, or The Scotchman, so named because he was born in Scotland, or at least descended of a Scottish family. He was a monk of the order Premontre ; floiu-ished about the year 1172, and died in 1180. St. Nor- bert, the institutor of that order, sent him into Scotland to profess and teach theology there. He was afterwards made bishop of Withern. His works, of which many are still found among old manuscripts, are almost entirely theo- logical. Several of them were printed at Antwerp and Paris in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. ADAM OF ORLETON, bishop of Winchester, obtained no very enviable notoriety by his intrigues during the reign of the feeble Edward II. He is said to have died in 1375, bhnd, at an ad- vanced age. The story of the dubious answer given by him to those who wished to murder Edward ( Edwardum occidere nolite timere boniim est) has not been con- sidered quite authentic. ADAM, (Melchior, d. 1622,) rector of the college at Heidelberg, and a very useful writer. The best of his works, Vitse Germanorum Philosophonnu, (Hei- delb. 1615—1620, in 4 vols. 8vo.) has been of great use to biographers of more recent times ; so also his Decades duas, Continentes Vitas Theologorum extero- rum Principum. (8vo. Francf. 1618.) "I am much indebted," says Bayle, "to the labours of Melchior Adam." Baillet has a still higher eulogium on this biographer. With regard to his great biographical work in 4 vols, it ought to be stated that the volumes are often met with separately, and have often been reprinted separately. Vol. I. con- tains poets, historians &c. ; II. Theolo- gians ; III. Jm-isconsults ; IV. Physicians, &c. He wrote also some pieces on clas- sical subjects. Henning Witte, in his Diarium Biographicum, has done for the theologians of the seventeenth century what Adam did for the sixteenth. ADAM, (Jacques, 1633—1735,) a AD A ADA native of Vendome, translated part of Du Thou's Memoires, the Memoirs of Montecuculli, (the relative of the Car- dinal de Tournon,) and tlie whole of Athenaeus. This last translation has not been published ; but some use was made of it by Lefebvre de Villebrune. If Adam corrected, as he boasted, 2,000 errors in the Greek text wliich was in- tended to accompany the translation, he must surely have deserved something more than the faint praise of Lefebvre. His highest praise is, that he was asso- ciated with the abbe Fleury in the educa- tion of the prince de Conti ; that he collected materials for the ecclesiastical history of that celebrated wi-iter, by whom he was highly esteemed. ADAM, (Jean d', 1684,) a Jesuit pro- fessor of Bordeaux, who obtained much celebrity by his fiirious denunciations against the Augustinians. Nor did he spare that celebrated saint, whom he called "this hot-headed African," and other names. It was on this man, who compared the queen to the Virgin Mary, &c. that the celebrated witticism was made — a nobleman declared his belief in pre-Adamites, because, he said, " he could not think father Adam the first of men." His works were chiefly in favour of tran- substantiation. ADAM, (L. S. 1700—1759,) a native of Nancy, and a sculptor, whose reputation was almost European. His fii-st efforts were to restore the great works of former masters ; but his Neptune calming the Waves; Neptune and Amphitrite ; St. Jerome, &c. proved that he had a good conception, and a better execution. His taste, however, was bad, and he will never rank higher than a second-rate artist, even in France, where there is no disposition to undervalue his merits. ADAM, (N. S. 1705—1778,) brother of the preceding, was about his equal in merit. It was his daily prayer to God, that he might neither be the first nor the last in his profession ; and it was sure enough granted. For liis Prometheus Vinctus tlie king of Prussia offered him 30,000 francs — a great sum in France nearly a century ago ; but he intended it for his own royal master. ADAM, (F. G. 1710—1759,) brother of the two preceding, also a scidptor, but in celebrity scarcely equal to either. ^ ADAM, (Nicolas, 1716—1792,) a na- tive of Paris, and professor of eloquence at Lisieux ; wrote several elementary ti-eatises, and ti'anslated Horace, Phae- druS) and the Rasselas of Johnson. 90 ADAM, (Robert, 1728 — 1792), a native of Kirkaldy, and an architect of considerable reputation, especially with his own countrymen. His father was an architect also, and sent him to the uni- versity of Edinburgh, where he became acquainted with many of the distin- guishedmen of his day, Hume, Robertson, &:c. He went to Italy for improvement, to enlarge his views of art altogether ; and appears to have studied the remains of antiquity with considerable diligence. Anxious, however, to obtain a knowledge of the habitations of the ancients, for which the public buildings which remain give little or no data, in company with M. Clerisseau, a French artist, he visited, in 1757, the ruins of Dioclesian's palace at Spalatro. In 1762 he was appointed architect to their majesties ; and in 1764 he published his account of the Ruins of the Palace of Dioclesian at Spalatro in Dalmatia, with many plates, — a work which bears a high reputation. His architectural labours enriched Edinburgh and Glasgow witli many buildings, which are praised ; and London with the Adelphi (the joint work of him- self and his brother), and Portland Place. The two last works are certainly elegant, if they can claim no higher praise ; and their erection forms a sort of epoch in the history of oiir street architecture, the credit of improving whicli very ma- terially is clearly due to Mr. Adam. In conjunction with his brother James (who died 1794) he published several numbers of a book entitled. The Works in Architecture of R. and J. Adam. ADAM, (Alex. LL.D. 1741—1809), a schoolmaster of Edinburgh, and a very useful elementary writer on classical subjects. A native of the county of Moray, he was educated at Edinburgh, and in 1761 was made schoolmaster of AVatson's Hospital. In 1767 he was ap- pointed assistant to the master of the High School, and afterwai'ds, in 1771, became the rector himself. His works on Ancient Geogi-aphy and on Roman Antiquities, and his other works, are too well known to require any description. Dr. Adam was imprudent and unwise enough during the French revolution to introduce some of the new political opi- nions into his school, for which he has been justly censured ; but in other re- spects he was an excellent schoolmaster, and raised the reputation of the High School very considerably. ADAM, or ADAMI, (Jacob,) an ec- clesiastic of Pomerania, who did much for ADA ADA the progress of the refonnation at Dantzic. He wrote several treatises, which, among the vast chaos of religious controversy, are not likely to be distinguished. ADAM, (Jacob, born 1768.) This engraver was joined with Mansfeld in engraving a series of Austrian portraits. ADAM^US, (Theodoric, d. 1560,) a writer of some merit, wished, like Charles V. to whom he dedicated two of his works, to produce an union between all christian churches. Hence his trea- tise, De Christiani Orbis Concorditi. He also wrote on the knights of Rhodes, and on the wars which those military eccle- siastics sustained against the Turks ; and translated from the Greek an abridgment of jurisprudence. ADAMANTIUS, a physician of Alex- andria, and afterwards of Constantinople, in the fom-th century. He wrote on phy- siognomy, the most conjectmral of all subjects. ADAMANUS, or ADAMNANUS, abbot of lona, (679 — 704,) and the fourth who held that office after St. Columba, is chiefly known as the ' bio- grapher of that saint. He was evidently a man of great piety, and of some learn- ing, but he had that fatal defect of the age, — unbounded credidity. His Life of St. Columba abounds with it. Yet that biogi-aphy will be read with interest, so long as piety and virtue have any charms for men. It may be found in Canisius (Lectiones) andin Bollandus(die Sept.l5). ADAMI, (Antonio F. 1720—1761,) a native of Florence ; a miscellaneous writer, but chiefly known as a poet, espe- cially of the lyrical kind. ADAMI, (Adam,) a Benedictine monk of the I7th century, and subsequent titular bishop of Hieropolis, who wrote a history of the peace of Westphalia. ADAMI, (Leonardo, 1690—1719,) a native of Bolsema, Tuscany, was so far extraordinary, that though he passed his youth on the deep, he subsequently made considerable progress in the oriental lan- guages, especially in Hebrew, Arabic, and Syriac, and still more in Greek, a language not sufficiently studied by the Roman Catholics of any country, and least of all in Italy. Had his life been spared, he would have been a pro- digy. He left the first volume of a book, which, considering his youth, was a mar- vellous production : it is a history of Arcadia, from the earliest times to the reign of Aristocrates the Younger. The second volume was to have finished the work. The history of Adami has this 91 fault, — that the naiTative is perpetually inteiTupted by quotations not always pertinent to the subject. It resembles, says Facciolati, a city in which there are more strangers than native inhabi- tants. A history of the Peloponnesus, a new edition of Jomandes, and other works, Avere projected by this young man. ADAMI, (Ernest D.b. 1716,) a Pole, who studied music and divinity. He wrote a volume on a curious subject, — on the threefold echo at the entrance of the forest of Aderbach, in Bohemia. It was published in German, atLignitz,l750. ADAMI, (Andrea,) master of the pontifical chapel early in the last cen- tury ; wrote on the church service. ADAMOLI, (P. 1707— 1769,) a na- tive of Lyons, who held an official ap- pointment in the city, was distinguished for his love of literature, and for his collections of books, MSS. and models, which he bequeathed to the academy of Lyons. In his will he declared that his collection shovdd be open to the public once a week ; that the librarian should be an academician, and if possible the father of a family ; but on no account shoidd a monk, or a bookseller, fill the post, lest rubbish should be mixed with his valuable stock. His library is indeed a choice one, yet it now extends to 12,000 volumes. ADAMS. Many are the persons of this name whom England and Scotland declare to be worthy of commemoration. 1. William, who died in 1621, was one of our earliest navigators into the East. In 1598 he had the direction, as pilot, of one Dutch vessel out of five, which were subject to an admiral of that nation. So little was navigation understood in those days, that they proceeded westwards; and when off" the Chilian coast, the fol- lowing year,only two vessels remained,and of these the crews were nearly consumed by death or disease. One vessel only, — that which Adams steered — reached Japan. At first they were imprisoned by order of the emperor, but soon after- wards liberated and allowed to trade. Adams, by his skill in mechanics, be- came a favourite with the monarch. The consideration with which he was treated, the lands which he possessed, made him in no huiTy to revisit England, and he died at Firando, in about twenty years after his arrival. He procured for both the English and the Dutch, permission to trade with those distant islands, and to him their first commercial settlements are owing. ADA ADA 2. Sir TJiomat, mayor of London, a native of Weni, in Shropshire, 1586, will be held in respect so long as loyalty to the sovereign is esteemed a virtue. Educated at Cambridge, and entered in the drapers' company; in 1609, he was chosen sheriff, and during that year he entirely abandoned his own business, so that he might devote his whole time to his new duties. When alderman, lie was elected president of St. Thomas's hospital, and he is said to have been the means of saving that institution from total ruin, by discovering the frauds of a dishonest steward. Though retiu-ned to parliament, he declined to take his seat, and for this obvious reason, — that he had little community of feeling with the pu- ritanical and disloyal party who consti- tvited the majority of that assembly. In 1645, he was elected mayor of London. Such was his known attachment to the royal cause, that his house was searched for treasonable correspondence ; and one year he was committed to the tower by the usurpers of the government. During the exile of the second Charles, he ex- hibited a notable proof of his loyalty, by remitting 10,000/. to that monarch. He was 74 years of age when sent conjointly with general Monk to congratulate Charles at Breda. By that monarch he was knighted, a dignity which was soon afterwards raised to a baronetcy. His charities through life were great; he was the friend of the poor ; and some noble foundations attest his piety and taste for letters. 3. Richard, a nonconformist divine, a native of Cheshire, took his Master's degree at Cambridge, in 1644. Having studied at Oxford and held a fellowship there, his opinions rendering him not disagreeable to the men in power, he succeeded to the living of St. Mildred's, Bread Street, London, where he preached until he was expelled for nonconformity in 1662. He wrote some sermons, com- piled the notes on St. Paul's Epistles to the Philippians and Colossians, in Poole's Bible, and assisted his brother Thomas Adams, in other works. He died in 1684. 4. Thomas, brother of the preceding, (d. 1670,) wrote on the Principles of Religion, and against the Church Esta- blishment. 5. Fitzherhert, (1651—1719,) a man of some learning, we are told, but deserv- ing of praise chiefly for the care with which he enforced discipline, as vice- chancellor of Oxford. He held a good stall in Dm-ham cathedral. 92 6. John, took his Bachelor's degi-efi at Cambridge in 1678, and in 1712 was elected provost of King's, which he held with some good preferments. He wrote some sermons. 7. William, (1707—1789,) a prebend of Gloucester, master of Pembroke, Ox- ford, and archdeacon of Llandaff"; wrote some sermons, and replied to Hume's Essay on Miracles. This divine was a friend of Dr. Johnson's. 8. Sariiuel, a native of Massachusetts, and one of the most ardent defenders of American independence. He was one of the first, if not the very first, to or- ganize societies of the people, and to enrol troops. He is reported to have said, on the day after the battle of Lex- ington, ' It is a fine day, — I mean, this is a glorious day.' His ardent zeal for the independence of the colonies, was rewarded by a seat in congress for the state of Massachusetts. But he was a furious zealot, an honest one indeed, but not the less mischievous. He would have no army, — this was an invention of kings and tyrants : every citizen shoidd be a soldier. Had his advice been fol- lowed, there would soon have been an end of the American confederation. To- wards the close of his life, he grew more rational. He died as he had lived — poor, and for this reason has been called " the American Cato." He was known as a political writer against governor Shirley, (see the name.) He was tax-gatherer, and by this means had a wide acquaint- ance and much influence, at Boston. His first seat in the assembly of Massachusetts Avas in 1765, and in 1774 he became a member of the General Congress. In 1775 he was proscribed with John Han- cock, by the last act of the British Go- vernment. Governor Hutchinson spoke of the impossibility of appeasing his op- position to the British government by any place, from th« inflexibility of his indisposition ; but he accuses him of being, as a political writer, the most artful and insinuating of all men whom he ever knew, and "the most successful in rob- bing men of their characters, and calum- niating governors and other servants of the crown." He states also, that Mr. Adams, by a defalcation as collector, had injured his character ; but he adds, that " the benefit to the town from his defence of their liberties he supposed an equiva- lent to his arrears as their collector." President Adams speaks of him in the highest terms : " his inflexible integrity, his disinterestedness, &c. and his pure ADA ADA public virtue, were not exceeded by any man in America." His writings were chiefly in newspapers and pamphlets ; a collection of them, says president Adams, would throw light on American history for fifty years. Dr. Allen, who seldom allows an English soldier to escape without a remark on the unchris- tian nature of all war, speaks in glowing terms of the faith and christian dispo- sition of Mr. Adams, though not a man of very peaceable character : but the cause, we presume, sanctifies the use of war on one side. His correspondence in 1790 with J. Adams, the jiresident U. S., was published in 1800. (Allen's American Biographical Dictionary.) 9. John, (1735—1826,) president of the United States of America, was born at Braintree, in Massachusetts. He was of the same family as the preceding, and could trace his ancestors to the original settlers of the colony in 1608. He was educated at Harvard College, and some friends advised him to study theology ; but he had imbibed opinions on religion hostile to those of the New England churches, and probably was, or became afterwards, an Unitarian (see Allen's Dictionary). He therefore preferred following the legal profession ; and, in 1761, having practised some time at Quincy, he was admitted to the bar. The arguments of Mr. Otis against the intro- duction of "Writs of Assistance," (a sort of search warrant for certain goods not having paid taxes,) by the British, made a great noise at Boston, and produced much effect on Mr. Adams. He said, " then and there the child Independence was born." In 1764 he man-ied Miss Smith, a descendant of Colonel Quincy ; and in 1765 he published his Essay on Canon and Feudal Law (reprinted in London), which was a kind of attack on kings and priests. In 1765 he removed to Boston, and refused a lucrative post. In 1769 he was one of the committee of Boston for drawing up instructions to their representatives to resist the British encroachments. In 1770 he, with Quincy and Blowers, defended the soldiers ac- cused of mvirder, in consequence of an affray at Boston ; and procured their ac- quittal, except two, who were branded for manslaughter. In 1770 he became a member of the legislature. In 1773 he wrote in the Boston Gazette against making judges dependent for their salary on the crown. In 1773 he was elected to Congress, before the declaration of in- dependence was agx-eed upon ; but he had 93 resolved on " sinking or swimming with his country," as he observed to his Tory friend Sewall. These two friends had a controversy in the Boston Gazette, Adams as Novanglus, and Sewall as Mas- sachusettensis, on the right of British in- terference in taxation, &c. ; in which Mr. Adams maintained the American side of the question most strenuously. In 1 776 he seconded the motion of Mr. Lee in Congress, " that the States are, and of right ought to be, free and independent;" and was one of the committee for draw- ing up the Declaration of Independence. The committee were Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, Shennan, and R. H. Livingston, of which the two first were the sub-com- mittee ; and, at the request of Adams, Jefferson drew it up. He accompanied Dr. Franklin as ambassador to France, to solicit the aid of that power. On his return, he drew up a constitution for the state of Massachusetts, which has been mentioned with great applause by foreign- ers, and is much esteemed by natives. Ambassador to the States-General of Holland, he di-ew them into a war with Great Britain ; concluded a treaty of peace and commerce with that power; and he was one of the plenipotentiaries to conclude a peace Avith England. When, in 1787, a central administrative govern- ment was established, of which the au- thority in general matters was binding in all the States of the Union, Jolm Adams was elected vice-president, — the superior chair falling to General Washington. The period was a stormy one. The demo- ci-atic pai-ty, at the head of which was Jefferson, were hostile to the change in the constitution ; and Adams, one of the staunchest advocates for that change, was assailed in terms of unmeasured abuse. He was too good a lawyer — too well versed in history — not to know that in every con- stitution there must be some balance to democracy, or anarchy will soon dissolve the social fabric. When the French re- volution broke out, the republicans — so the democratic party were called — cla- moured for a war with England : the federalists, or rational supporters of the union, — all the men of character and talent in the new government, — were for neutrality. The latter party triumphed. Under the second presidency of Washing- ton, Adams filled the second post in the republic. When that general announced his intention of retiring from his higli post, there was a keen contest between the republicans and the federalists, — the former proposing Jefferson, the latter ADA ADA Adams, to the high honour. The latter triumphed, owing partly to the impru- dence of the French ambassador, who evidently aspired to an undue and dan- gerous influence over the destinies of the infant republic. It was in 1797 that Adams was thus invested with the supreme magistracy. His conduct was distin- guished by great moderation, yet by great firmness. He saw how necessary it was to oppose every possible check to the progress of democracy ; and he fore- saw that in France the duration of the republic woidd be much shorter than was generally supposed. On the expiration of his quinqviennial labours, however, the democratic party prevailed, and Jefferson was elected to the supreme office. From this time, Adams retired into private life, and devoted much of his leisure to lite- rary pm'suits. He died at New York in 1826. It is remarkable enough that he and Jefferson died on the smne day, and that day the anniversary of the Declara- tion of Independence, the 4th of July, just 50 years after the event. The writings of Mr. Adams are less known in this country than their merit deserves. Besides his History of the Quarrel between Great Britain and the American Colonies, he published a De- fence of the Constitution and Govern- ment of the United States of America ; or the Necessity of a Balance between the Powers of a Free Government (Lon- don, 1787). His next work, a History of the Principal Republics of the World, (3 vols. 8vo. London, 1794,) is an ampli- fication of the principles contained in the former. While advocating the advantages of a republic, he proves that a pure demo- cracy is the worst possible form of go- vernment ; that it is but another word for anarchy ; that it is inconsistent with social security ; and that it cannot be durable. This is both a learned and a judicious work. (Allen's American Biog. Diet. Biog. Univ. Life of Jefferson. American Newspapers, &c.) 10. John, usually called the Patriarch of Pitcairn's Island, was one of the crew of the Bounty, who in 1789, mutinied against captain Bligh, in the Friendly Islands. He was indeed the ringleader of the mutiny. After a residence at Otaheite, Adams, who had reason to fear the vengeance of the English govern- ment, resolved to settle in some other island less accessible to Europeans. Accompanied by eight of the crew, and many natives of Otaheite, he repaired to Pitcairn's island, and on landing, caused 94 the vessel to be burnt. This was in 1790. A village Avas soon built; the whole island was parcelled out amongst the bold adventurers ; and the Otaheitans were regarded merely as so many head of cattle. But a civil war followed, in which the coloured slaves perished. At its conclusion, Adams, three other Eng- lishmen, ten Otaheitan women, and some children, were all that remained of the original colonists ; and of these English- men, one drank until his senses left him, and he drowned himself. In a short time, another of the Bounty's crew, who endeavoured to seize the wife of his countryman by force, was killed by the injured husband. This was a sorrowful beginning : of the civilized colonists, Adams and Young only remained ; and their existence was dubious. At this crisis, the former, convinced that without the sanction of religion, no society can subsist, began to introduce family wor- ship, and to read prayers to the rest of the colonists. The example was followed by the other families ; and public de- votion was soon associated with private. Sceptics, who deny the influence of Christianity, — its regenerating effects — will be at some loss to account for the contrast in the condition of the colonists before and after the institution of divine worship. Peace replaced constant hos- tility ; affection succeeded to unmitigated enmity ; the self-denying virtues, to the vices which vanity unrestrained by prin- ciple is sure to engender. The children were no longer brought up as pagans ; they were taught to read and write, — their duty to God, to their parents, to their neighbours. In this work of civili- sation. Young, who had some education, was zealous. On his death in 1801, Adams had the sole administration of the colony. The women of Otaheite were good helpmates in the work of education ; tliey were docile, affec- tionate, and most useful. In short, the colony was one of the best regulated, one of the happiest, on the face of the earth. Still Adams was a mutineer ; a king's vessel might one day arrive, and bear him to England. In 1814, one did arrive, — the Briton; and the captain wished that Adams should accompany him, — not, however, that he should be punished, but that the British adminis- tration should formally acquit him of the penalty incurred by his conduct towards captain Bligh. The grief, however, of the inhabitants was such, that he de- sisted. In 1825, captain Beechy touched ADA ADA at the island, and was much interested by the appearance of the excellent old man and his subjects, — for subjects they literally were. To tranquilhze his con- science, the captain married him to a Tahiti woman, with whom he had long cohabited, — one blind and worn out. The only apprehension of the patriarch was, that the island would soon be un- able to maintain the rapidly increasing population. It was shared by the Eng- lish government, who showed a dispo- sition to transplant the colony to Tahiti, or some other island ; but the cnielty of removing the people from a scene to which they had been so long accustomed, and were so much attached, was apparent, and the project was abandoned. This attachment need not surprise us, when we perceive that a missionary, who in 1828 landed on the island, refused to quit it ; that he resolved to end his days there, in the twofold office of minister and schoolmaster. The spectacle of old Adams acting as clerk to the minister, in the celebration of public worship, was a pleasing one. Adams died the following year, and liis wife survived him a few months only. We leave the reader, — the christian reader, — to draw his own inferences from tliis relation. We hope too that it will not be lost on the infidel. (See Beechy's Voyage to the Pacific Ocean, and to Behring's Straits. Barrow, History of the Mutiny of the Bounty.) ADAMS, (James,) an English Jesuit, born A. D. 1737; commenced his novi- ciate at Watton, Sept. 7, 1756 ; aftenvards taught the belles-lettres at St. Omer. Having exercised his functions as a mis- sionary for many years, he retired to Dublin, Augvist, 1802, and died there in the following month of December. He was the author of the under-mentioned works. 1 . ' Early Rules for Taking a Likeness ;' with plates. 8vo. London, 1792 ; translated from Bonamici. 2. ' Oratio Academica Anglice et Latine ;' London, 1793. 3. ' Euphonologia Lingua Anglicanae, Latine et Gallice ;' 8vo. Lon- don, 1 794 ; for which he received the thanks of the Royal Society. 4. ' Ride Britannia, or the Flattery of Free Sub- jects Expounded ; to which is added an Academical Discourse;' London, 1798. 5. 'A Sermon preached at the Catholic Chapel of St. Patrick, Sutton-street, on Wednesday, March 7, the Day of Public Fast;' London, 1798. 6. 'The Pronun- ciation of the English Language Vindi- cated;' Edinb. 1799. ADAMS, ^Robert, b. 1540.) An ar- 95 chitect and engraver in London, and Surveyor of the Works to Queen Eliza- beth. He engraved a series of prints in 1589, exhibiting the battles between the English fleet and the Spanish amiada. ADAMS, (Joseph, M. D. F. L. S. 1756—1818.) The father of this phy- sician was a practising apothecary in London, a rigid dissenter, whose reli- gious scruples would not permit him to allow his son to gi-aduate at either of the universities of Oxford or Cambridge. He, however, received a good classical education ; and having been apprenticed to his father, became a member of the Society of Apothecaries. He studied under Dr. Pitcairn and Mr. Pott at St. Bartholomew's, Dr. Saunders at Guy's, and Mr. John Hunter at St. George's hospitals. In 1790 he became a member of the Corporation of Surgeons, and in 1795 published a small volume on Moi-bid Poisons, which being sent to the university of Aberdeen, he thereby obtained a diploma of M.D., and in the following year quitted London for Ma- deira, where he resided during eight years, engaged in much practice, and occupied in medical researches. He visited the lazaretto near Funchal, and made himself acquainted with the le- prosy, yaws, &c. ; the information re- specting which, he printed in the second edition of his work on Morbid Poisons, by which he is principally known to the medical profession. He has the merit of having introduced the cow-pox into Madeira. He returned to England in 1805, was admitted an extra-licentiate (without examination) of the London Royal College of Physicians ; and Dr. WoodvUle dying in 1806, he succeeded him as physician at the Small-pox Hos- pital. At this time, the practice of vac- cination was slowly recovering from the effects of numerous unfounded attacks by which it had been assaUed. A general report was fonned under the inspection of Dr. Adams, and circulated by the committee of the hospital, to remove alarm and inspire confidence. This, together with a second report, was com- municated to the College of Physicians, printed and circulated, and passed through thirteen editions. The produce of the sale was appropriated to the hos- pital ; a net balance of cash, amounting to 1517/. 16*. 8d., being invested and made available for the general pm-poses of the institution. Dr. Adams was a great advocate of the opinion, that cow-pox and small-pox are ADA ADA one and the same disease. This was the opinion of Dr. Jenner, and has been well established. Dr. Adams drew his arguments in favour of their identity from the near resemblance of the most favourable kinds of small-pox to the cow-pox, and presumptive proofs deduced fi'om the laws of other morbid poisons, that the variolous and vaccine is the same. He contended that the character of the disease might be changed by a selection of the pustule from which the inoculation should take place ; and that thus se- lecting cases of what he denominated pearl small-pox, and inoculating from these, similar mild affections ensued, so that it was exceedingly difficult to dis- tinguish these cases from those of cow- pox. Having received in 1804 an accession of private fortune, Dr. A. was enabled to indulge his taste for study, and also his philanthropy towards his more indi- gent fellow-creatm-es. His attachment to his profession was very ardent : be- sides delivering several courses of lec- tures, he edited the London Medical and Physical Journal, for many years, with great credit. His death followed a com- pound fracture of the leg, and took place suddenly and unexpectedly on the 20th June, 1818, at the age of 62. He was buried in Bunhill-fields, with the simple motto of " Vir Justus et bonus," inscribed on his tomb. He published the following works: — 1. Observations on Morbid Poisons, Phagedsena, and Cancer. Lond. 1795. 8vo. Second edit. 1807. 4to. The singular title of this work is derived from Mr. Hunter's division of poisons into the natural and the diseased ; — those belonging to an animal in health, capable of affecting others, but producing no noxious effect on the animal by which it is formed ; and those which are the result of diseased action, and capable of ex- citing a similar condition in other indi- viduals. He treats, among other dis- eases, of Leprosy, or the Elephantiasis of the ancients, the Elephantiasis of the moderns, or the Barbadoes Leg, and the Lepra Graecorum, &c. He also gives an account of the Acarus Syro (Exulcerans of Linnaeus) by some considered as the Itch Insect. During these researches, he inoculated himself and part of his fa- mily with the insect, to prove that the itch and the disease from the Acarus were distinct from each other. To com- prehend more precisely the nature of the Sibbens or Sivvens, he made a joiu-ney into Dumfries-shire, &c. ; and he has given a good summary of all that is known upon this subject. 2. Observations on the Cancerous Breast. Lond. 1801. 8vo. Second edit. 1805. He regards the existence of cysts or hydatids, possessed of a life independent of the subject in which they grow, as constituting the true essential character of the tiiie carcinoma. Dr. Baron has since carried the matter farther, and affirms that all tumours take their origin from hydatids. 3. Guide to Madeira. Lond. 1801. 8vo. Second edit. 1808. 4. Answers to all the Objections hitherto made against Cow-pox. Lond. 1805. 8vo. 5. A jjopular View of Vaccine Inoculation. Lond. 1807. 12rao. G. Reports of the Royal College of Physicians in London, Dublin, and Edinburgh, on Vaccination ; with introductoiy Remarks, and other Papers. Lond. 1809. 8vo. These being addressed rather to the public than to the profession, are written in a popular style, and served in a measure to allay the anxiety naturally entertained on such an important subject. 7. An Inquiry into the Laws of Epidemics. Lond. 1809. 8vo. In this work. Dr. Adams assists in marking the distinction between contagious and infectious dis- eases. The first proposal for the esta- blishment of savings banks appears in this volume. Appendix, No. 4. 8. A Republication of one of John Hunter's Treatises, with a Commentary, which possesses no particular claims to notice. 9. Syllabus of a Course of Lectures on the Institutes and Practice of Medicine. Lond. 1811. 12mo. 10. A Philoso- phical Treatise on the Hereditary Pecu- liarities of the Human Race : with Notes illustrative of the subject, particulai'ly in Gout, Scrofula and Madness. Lond. 1814. 8vo. Second edit. 1815. To the latter is attached an Appendix on the Goitres and Cretins of the Alps and Pyrenees, which was originally printed in the London Medical and Physical Journal. 11. An Illustration of Mr. Hunter's Doctrine, particularly concern- ing the Life of the Blood. Lond. 1814. 8vo. His enthusiastic advocacy of the doctrines of John Hunter, led Dr. Adams to publish this reply to the observations in the Edinburgh Review on Mr. Aber- nethy's Physiological Lectures. 12. Memoirs of the Life and Doctrines of the late John Hunter, Esq. Lond. 1817. 8vo. Second edit. 1818. This life is as injudicious, as that by Jesse Foot is ma- licious. Sir Edward Home's is very impei-fect 13. On Epilepsy. Lond. ADA ADA 1817. 8vo. This paper, (which is in- serted in the Memoirs of the Medical Society of London,) forms a good state- ment of the imperfection of medical science as it regards epilepsy, its causes, modes of treatment, &c. His success in the cui'e of acute epilepsy has not been confirmed by subsequent experience. ADAMS, (W.) a captain in the British navy, slain in Boscawen's unsuccessful siege of Pondicherry. (See Boscawen.) ^ ADAMS, (Lieut.-General Alexander, d. 1836,) an officer of very high merit, who saw much service, principally in India. He joined the 78th Higlilanders in India, and in 1801 was the major in command of it. He distinguished liim- self highly under General Wellesley, (the duke of Wellington,) in the Mahratta war, and on several occasions received the thanks of that commander. After the settlement of Java, he was appointed to a command in the army, and also as minister at tlie court of tlie emperor ; and discharged his delicate duties to the great advantage of his country. He died by an accidental discharge of his gun while out shooting, in 1835. (Ann. Obit.) ADAMS. Several persons of this name are enumerated in the American Biographical Dictionary. 1. EUphalet, (1732—1809,) a great Hebrician (!) according to the American authorities. He left some sermons. 2. John, (1704—1740,) a preacher for some time in Rhode Island ; but known (to Americans) as a poet and man of literature. His poems were published at Boston in 1745. The reader may like to see a specimen of this volume. Dr. Allen has selected the following lines on Cotton Mather, which are here quoted verbatim. What numerous volumes, scattered from his hand. Lightened his own, and warmed each foreign land! AVhat pious breathings of a glowing soul Live in each page and animate the whole ! The breath of heaven the savoury pages show, As we Arabia from its spices know. Ambitious, active, towering was his soul, But flaming piety inspired the whole. 3. Matthew, called " a distinguished ■writer" by Dr. Allen. He wrote some of the essays in the New England Journal: d. 1753. 4. Amos, (of Harvard college, 1727 — 1775,) a very diligent preacher. He published many sermons, and a pamphlet against Diocesan Episcopacy ; being the Dudleian Lecture at Harvard college, for 1770. 5. Zabdiel, (1739—1801,) minister of Lunenburg, Massachusetts ; v.'rote several sermons and controversial pamphlets. VOL. I. 97 ADAMSON, (Patrick, 1543—1591,) archbishop of St. Andrews at a very troubled period, — when the Scottish presbyterians were intent on destroying what remained of the ancient form of worship. A native of Perth, he sailed into France as tutor, and was at Bourges Avhen the diabolical massacre of St. Bar- tholomew was pei"petrated. He and his pupil escaped by secreting themselves seven months in an obsciu-e tavern ; but their generous host, though 70 years of age, suffered for the act : he was pre- cipitated from the roof of his own house, and dashed to pieces. These months were not idly spent by Adamson : he trans- lated the book of Job into Latin verse, and wrote his Latin tragedy of Herod. In 1573 he returned to Scotland, entered the church, was employed on the com- mission for the settlement of the church, was chaplain to the earl of Morton, and on the death of Douglas was raised to the archiepiscopal see of St. Andrews. In this liigh office, he endeavoured to retain whatever the presbyterians had left his church. For this conduct he was so detested by them, that apprehensions were entertained for his personal safety. By James VI. he was sent ambassador to the court of Elizabeth, where he abode some years. His mission was to strengthen the party for the accession of James ; nor did he lose sight of another object, — that of protecting the episcopal church of Scotland. In 1584 he was recalled; was excommunicated by the presbyterian sjiiod two years afterwards ; and though on his submission absolved, he had little to expect from the people or the king. The church was, in the eyes of its opponents and of the needy in general, a fit object of plunder ; and James granted the revenues of St. An- drews to the duke of Lennox. The prelate's future life was consequently wretched. Yet he cannot be acquitted of blame ; he certainly exhibited a criminal pusillanimity in submitting to the General Assembly — in betraying the interests of a church which had subsisted for so many ages. Besides the works we have men- tioned, he left others in MS., some of which were published by Wilson, his son-in-law, 1619. (Spottiswoode's Church History of Scotland. Mackenzie's Lives.) ADANSON, (Michael, 1727—1806,) one of the men who has done most honour to the French nation by his re- searches in natural history. Attached to the household of the archbishop of Paris, by whom he was placed in the H ADA ADA university of that city, he received a good education. Pliny and Aristotle were his favourites; but on receiving a micro- scope from an eminent naturalist, he became an observer for himself. His time was well divided between his studies, his attendance on public lectures, at the king's gardens, and private collections. Reaumur, Bernard, and Jussieu were the guides of his childhood : Linnisus ap- peared, and gave him scope for reflection. His progress was great, but it did not equal his wishes ; and on reaching his 21st year, he departed, at his own ex- pense (thereby exhausting his slender patrimony), to the Senegal, to pursue his botanical and other researches in that unhealthy part of the world. There, with the most patient industry, he re- mained three years. On his retiu-n to Paris, he published his Histoire Naturel du Senegal, (4to. 1757,) which made a great impression. His attempts at a new classification, and a new nomenclature, were, however, not well received, though they have been since, partially at least, adopted by the naturalists of France. Some of his contributions to the Transac- tions of the Academy of Sciences were distinguished alike by their novelty and force. During so many years his written observations had attained a gigantic size, and he formed the project of publishing a natural history on a scale commensu- rate with the vastness of the subject. It was to be entitled Ordre Universel de la Nature, to be comprised in 27 octavos. But this was not all : it was to be ac- companied by his Natural History of Senegal, 8 vols. ; by a Course of Natural History ; by a Universal Vocabulary of Natural History ; by a Dictionary of Natural History ; by 40,000 plates ; and by the engraving of about 34,000 species which he had preserved in his museum. Astounded at such an announcement, the Parisian world regarded him as half mad. The government would not assist him ; men of science declared his plan to be impracticable ; and he was left to accumidate materials as he pleased. He was, however, more esteemed elsewhere, and offers were made him by England, Russia, Austria, and Spain, to reside in each of those countries. These he de- clined, from a resolution that France only, imgrateful as she was, should re- ceive the benefit of his labours. Still he was not destitute : he had a small pen- sion ; he held the office of royal censor ; he was a paid academician ; and the emoluments from all would have been 98 much more than sufficient for his wants, had he not lavishly expended all that he received on the objects of science. But when the revolution came, he was indeed left destitute. What troubled him still more, was to see his garden, his grounds, laid waste by a brutal mob. When the Institiite was created, he was invited to take his seat among the members : he replied that he could not attend, because he had no shoes ; and his letter induced the minister of the Interior to procure him a small pension. Many were the MSS. which he left behind, and which one day, perhaps ere long, will be turned to good account by the enterprising sci- entific men of Paris. (Supplement to Biog. Univ.) ADARBI. See Isaac. ADARSON. See Simon. ADASCHEFF, (Alexis,) minister of Ivan the Terrible, tsar of Russia in the sixteenth century, was the only man that exercised any influence over that whim- sical despot. On the destruction of the minister Zouiski, Adascheff" succeeded to the post, and was usefully employed in restraining the fury of his master. He prevailed on Ivan to prepare a new code of laws ; and the clergy Avere also re- quired to draw up a body of regiUations for the maintenance of discipline. Arti- sans, mechanics, men of science and literature, were, by permission of the emperor Charles V. brought fi-om Ger- many to Russia, and were employed in the regeneration of the country. He accompanied his master in the expedi- tion to Kasan, and negotiated the peace which followed. He had the sagacity to perceive the advantages which, in a commercial point of view, must accrue to Russia from a treaty with England. Richard Chancellor was the man whom our Edward VI. despatched to the court of the tsar. Alexis was the means of imiting Livonia with the empire ; that is, he furnished Ivan with the pretext for invading it with 40,000 men, and thus rendering it a province of Muscovy, His sei'vices were appreciated by the tsar, who did not fail to reward him ; but his success inspired envy ; and Ivan, who was credulous enough, was made to believe that his minister had treasonable designs. To escape the malice of his enemies, he solicited the government of Livonia ; but distance did not avail him. Orders were despatched from Moscow to throw him into prison, and in prison he died, probably through poison. A brother of this minister, Daniel ADA ADD Adaschejf, was general of the Musco- vites against the Tartars of Tauris, and was successful in his expedition. He died a natural death ; an uncommon thing in the generals and ministers of this sanguinary monarch. (Karamsin. His- toire de Russie.) ADDINGTON, (Antony, d. 1790,) a physician of Reading, who obtained much local celebrity, and who was even employed to negotiate the return of Lord Chatham to the ministry.- He was the father of Lord Sidmouth. He wrote on the scurvy, and on the mortality of beasts. ADDINGTON, (Stephen, 1729 — 1796,) a dissenting minister, a native of Northampton, was a pupil of the cele- brated Dr. Doddridge ; successively preacher at Spaldwich in Huntingdon- shire, and Market Harborough in Lei- cestershire. He obtained some local celebrity, especially as a schoolmaster. For the benefit of his pupils, he wrote some elementary works. In 1781 he removed to London, and combined with the care of a chapel the business of tui- tion as before. ADDISON, (Lancelot, 16.32—1703,) father of the celebrated writer, was a native of Crosby Ravensworth, in West- moreland. As he was the son of a cler- gyman, he was early designed for the same j^rofession. At college he distin- guished himself by his acqiurements, and still more by his dislike of the ruling hypocrites of the day. He therefore obtained no preferment until the Refor- mation, when loyalty, though often over- looked, Avas freqviently rewarded. His first preferment was a chaplaincy at Dun- kirk ; next, one at Tangier; in 1670 he was made king's chaplain ; soon after- wards he was presented with the rectory of Milston in Wiltshire, and a prebendal stall in the collegiate church of Sarum. In 1683 the commissioners for ecclesias- tical aiFairs conferred on him the deanery of Lichfield, in consideration of his ser- vices at Tangier. In conjunction with this preferment he held the archdeaconry of Coventry. The publications of this divine were numerous, but of no great importance. They related to Barbary — to the state of the Jews there ; to the early history of Mohammedanism ; to the plain duties of Christianity ; to the heresy which denied the godhead of Christ. Of these it is sufficient to observe, that they were received with approbation. ADDISON, (Joseph,) the son of the preceding, was born at Milston on the 1st of March, 1672. After receiving the 99 rudiments of education in schools at Amesbm-y and Salisbury, he was placed at the Charter-house, where he continued until his 15th year, when he was entered at Queen's college, Oxford. (Wood. Ath, Ox.) A copy of his Latin verses falling accidentally into the hands of Dr. Lan- caster, a fellow of Magdalen college, obtained his election in 1689 as a demy on that establishment. At the univer- sity, Addison devoted himself to the study of classical literature, especially the Latin poets, and to the composition of Latin poetry, in which he acquired consider- able reputation. In his 22d year he addressed a poem to Dryden in praise of his translations, which was soon followed by a version of the greater part of Vir- gil's fourth Georgic, which received Dryden's high commendations. The preface to the Georgics, and many of the arguments in Dryden's translation, were \VTittjen by Addison. (Dryden, De- dicat. ^neid; Tickell, Pref.) In the next year he wrote a poetical account of the most eminent English poets, which he addressed to his friend, Mr. (the afterwards famous Dr.) Sacheverell. Of this poem it is sufficient to observe, that in it he declares the desuetude of Chau- cer's langiiage to have obscxired his wit, and that he criticizes Spenser, whom he did not read till fifteen years afterwards. About this time he was introduced by Congi-eve (with whom he had become ac- quainted, probably, through Dryden) to Montague, chancellor of the exchequer, afterwards Lord Halifax, by whom he was dissuaded from his original intention of complying with his father's wishes, and taking orders. Montague applied to the president of Magdalen not to insist upon Addison entering the chmxh in conse- quence of " the pravity of public men who wanted liberal education." (Steele, Dedicat. Diiunmer. Hurd's Edit. Add. Works, vol, vi.) A poem that Addison addressed to king William in 1695, and dedicated to lord keeper Somei's, intro- duced him to the knowledge of that great statesman, through whom he shortly ob- tained a pension of 300/. a-year, to sup- port him during his travels. Having taken his degrees of bachelor and master of arts, he left England some time in the course of 1698 ; and after having spent a year at Blois, passed through Marseilles into Italy. (Add. Remarks on several Parts of Italy.) Whilst in Italy, he wrote his famovts poetical epistle to Lord Hali- fax, and accumulated the materials for his Dialogues unon the Usefulness of Ancient H 2 ADD ADD Medals, which he cast into form at Vi- enna in 1702. About this time he wrote the first four acts of his Cato, a tragedy which he had very early projected, and a sketch of which he probably completed at Oxford. (Spence, Anecd.) His pension being very irregidarly paid, he was, dur- ing his sojourn abroad, reduced at times to the greatest distress, and, we ai'e told by Swift, was compelled to engage him- self as a tutor to a travelling 'squire. When prince Eugene began the war in Italy, it was intended to have appointed Addison to attend him as secretary on the part of England; but the death of king William defeated this design, and Addison returned home by the way of Germany. Upon his arrival he found his friends, Lord Halifax and Lord Somers, no longer in power ; but this did not deter liim from dedicating his Travels in Italy to the latter. This work is said in the first instance to have disappointed the pxiblic, who expected rather details of the customs and the political institutions of the Italian states, than criticisms in Avhich ancient literature is illustrated by the modern appearance of Italy. Its re- putation, however, afterwards increased; and, previous to the publication of a se- cond edition, the value of copies was raised to four or five times their original price, (Tickell, Pref) Until the year 1704 Addison lived imknown, if not neglected. Probably it was during this interval that he undertook the edvication of the young eai-1 of Warwick. (Young, Letter to Mr. Tickell on the Death of Addison.) But Addison always preserved a studied silence upon this subject. (Spence.) After the victory at Blenlieim, the Lord Treasurer Godolphin, lamenting to Lord Halifax that it had not been celebrated in a manner fitting its import- ance, inquired whether his lordship knew any one capable of doing so. Halifax replied that he did, but that as men of inferior parts were so often prefen-ed to men of genius, he shoidd not name liim. Godolphin rejoined, that however just the censure might be, whoever Halifax might name should not find his labour lost; upon which Halifax mentioned Addison, and in consequence the trea- surer sent Mr. Boyle to wait on him, and propose the subject to him. Addison readily undertook .^lie task, and the result was — The Campaign. When lie had completed the poem as far as the simile of the angel, he communicated it to Go- dolphin, who immediately appointed him Commissioner of Appeals. (Budgell, 100 Mem. Boyle Fam.) In 1705 Addison is said to have accompanied Lord Hali- fax on his embassy to Hanover, and in the next year was appointed Under- secretary of State — an office he held first under Sir Charles Hedger, and then un- der the Earl of Sunderland. During his tenure of this office he wrote his opera of Rosamond, which did not succeed on the the stage. About the same time he as- sisted his friend and fellow Carthusian, Sir Richard Steele, in his comedy. The Tender Husband ; to which he also contri- buted a prologue. (Steele, Dedicat.Drum.) This play Steele dedicated to him. In 1709 Addison accompanied the Marquis of Wharton, who had been appointed Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland, as liis secre- tary — receiving at the same time the office of Keeper of the Irish Records, the salary of which was augmented in his favour. Whilst he was in Ireland, his fiiend Steele commenced the publication of tlie Tatler ; the authorship of which Addison detected from finding in the 6th number an observation he had him- self communicated in a passage in Virgil. He soon became a contributor. Previous to the relinquishment of the Tatler, Addison returned to England, and shortly afterwards with Swift devised the plan of the Spectator, the first number of v/hich was published the 1st of March, 1711. At first his contributions mani- fested his Whiggish predilections, but he soon resolved to avoid all party topics, and his prudence in this respect was confirmed by the success of the work. Its circula- tion is said to have reached at times 20,000 copies (Tickell, Pref), but 4000 was probably the maximum. (Compare Spectator, Nos. 10, 445, 555.) Addison's contributions to this periodical are sub- scribed by some letters in the name " Clio." In 1713 was produced his Cato, which Steele showed, when in an un- finished state, to Cibber and Pope, de- claring that its author wanted courage to suffer its performance. By the latter, Addison was advised to content himself with publishing it ; and this ad\ice he was disposed to follow, but his political connexions left him no option, and Cato was accordingly brought out at Dniry- lane. Although on the first night Steele carefully packed the house (Dedicat. Drum.), Addison was so apprehensive of failure that he wandered among the back scenes in a state of the most painful anxiety. It succeeded, however, amidst the applauses of both parties, and was acted for thirty-five successive ADD ADD nights. Bolingbroke attended on the first night, and between the acts sent for Booth, who played the principal cha- racter, and presented him with fifty guineas, for ha\dng defended the cause of liberty against a perpetual dictator, alluding to the design then ascribed to the Duke of Marlborough of obtaining the appointment of commander-in-chief for life. This play, the fifth act of which was written in less than a week (Steele, Dedicat. Dnim.), has been translated into the French, German, Itahan, and Latin languages. A Latin translation, made by the Jesuits at St. Omer, was acted by their pupils. Cato was attacked by Den- nis, in a severe criticism, to which Pope, owing Dennis a grudge, replied in so savage a manner, that Addison commis- sioned Steele to write to Dennis's pub- lisher, and disclaim in his name any connexion with his avenger. Dennis, however, did not succeed in diminishing the popularity of Cato, which was so great that the queen expressed a wish it should be dedicated to her ; but Addi- son having designed that honour for another, published it without any de- dication at all. While Cato was in the coiu^se of performance, Addison con- tributed several papers (distinguished by having the figure of a hand sub- joined) to Steele's new pei-iodical. The Guardian ; and also formed the project of compiling a great English dictionary, for which he made several collections. He also contributed extensively to the Spec- tator, then [18th June, 1714] newly re- vived, and which lasted for six months ; but political employment diverted him from literary pursuits, as, on the death of the queen, the lords justices made him their secretary. In this character he was required to apprise George I. of Anne's death and his own accession ; and is said to have been so overwhelmed with the greatness of the event, and so fastidious in the choice of his expressions, that the lords justices, who could not wait for the niceties of criticism, were compelled to send for a clerk of the privy council, and charge him with the task. However, it is believed, that on the amval of the king an eflSbrt was made to obtain for Addison a secretaryship of state (Budgell, Letter to Cleomenes, p. 20) ; and there is reason to think he refused the honour. (Lady M. W. Montague : Works by Lord Wharn- clifFe, vol. ii. p. 111.) He then accom- panied Lord Sunderland, who was made lord-lieutenant of Ireland, in quality of his secretary (Eusden, Letter to Mr. Ad- 101 dison) ; but that peer soon resigning his office, Addison returned to England, where he was made one of the lords of trade. He performed essential ser- vices to the government when the Scotch rebellion broke out, by publishing a poli- tical paper called The Freeholder (23d Sept. 1715), which he continued for nine months. It ceased on the 29th June, 1716. In August in this year he mar- ried, after a troublesome courtship, the countess of Warwick ; a match which contributed but little to his advance- ment, and nothing to his happiness. In the next year (16th April) he was made secretary of state, — an oftice which he was soon compelled to resign from his in- creasing infirmities. Another motive has been, indeed, assigned — that he felt him- self incompetent to his post, from liis deficiencies as a speaker, and his igno- rance of public business (Pope, Spence) ; and whether this were the case or not, it must be acknowledged he was not quali- fied to sliine in either of these departments. Retired from public life, Addison turned his attention chiefly to religious subjects, and continued a work on the evidences of Christianity, which he had some years before designed, and in part executed. This he never lived to com- plete. A new poetical version of the Psalms also occupied much of his attention. The Peerage Bill of his friend and former colleague. Lord Sunderland, giving birth to a fierce controversy, withdrew for a time his attention from these matters. The ob- ject of the Peerage Bill was to prevent the creation of more than a few new peers ex- cept on the extinction of an old title, — a measure which must ultimately have led to an oligarchy. This measure had been attacked by Steele imder the cognomen of The Plebeian. Addison replied in a pamphlet entitled The Old Whig ; to which Steele rejoined in a second Ple- beian. It is to Addison's discredit* that he gave this paper war a personal cha- racter by alluding, in an answer he put forth to Steele's reply, to " httle Dickey, whose trade it was to write pamphlets." "Dickey," however, in his retort, con- tented himself with quoting from Cato some lines " which were at once detection and reproof." (Johnson, Life of Addison.) Addison did not long survive this dis- * There is also another circumstance in his eon- duct to Steele which seems to require censure ; viz. his serving an execution on Steele for a debt of old standing of one hundred pounds. But various motives have been assijjned for it ; one of which ■was a desire to check Steele in a course of extrava- gance. ADD ADD pute. When he found himself dying, he sent for Gay, and told him he had injui*ed him, and that, if he recovered, he would make him recompense. He had probably been the means of withholding from him some court preferment. He sent also for Lord "Warwick, his step-son, whose licen- tious habits he had long striven to reform. "I have sent for you," he said, ".that you may see how a Christian can die." Having given directions to Tickell for the publication of his works, he de- parted this life, June 17, 1719, leaving one child, a daughter, about a year old. There have been some charges respect- ing Addison's chai-acter which have now to be considered. 1 . He has been charged with having prompted Philips and others to traduce Pope as a Tory and a Jacobite ; 2. With having, under the name of Tickell, his secretary, translated the first book of the Iliad, and published it at the time Pope had commenced the publica- tion of his Homer ; and, 3. With having hired Gildon to write a libel on Pope and his family. 1. The first charge is disproved by facts. Pope himself asserts that he was attacked by Philips in consequence of a satirical notice on Philips's Pastorals, which he had published in the Guardian, (Ayre, Life of Pope, vol. ii. p. 88,) and complains (Letter to Jervas, Works, vol. vii. p. 297) that in revenge Philij^s had endeavoured to influence Addison's mind against him. 2. The second charge can- not be so easily disposed of; on the sub- ject much has been conjectured, and httle is known. Pope never advanced this charge until after the death of Addison, There is no allusion to it in the famous character of Atticus, written after the publication of Tickell's Homer ; there is no allusion to it in any of Pope's letters during his quarrel with Addison ; nor was any mention nrade of it during an angry interview which was brought about between the two poets by Sir Richard Steele. (Ayre, Life of Pope, vol. i. p. 100. Rose, Life of Pope. D 'Israeli, Quar. Auth.) The circumstances which tell the most against Addison, are — 1. Dr. Young, Tickell's college friend, being unaware that Tickell had translated Homer. 2. Tickell's not knowing Lord Halifax at the time, although the translation was dedi- cated to him. 3. Tickell's saying to Pope that there was something underhand in the affair (Spence). 4. The passage in Steele's preface to the Drummer, chal- lenging Tickell to produce another book, &c. The first two circumstances prove 102 nothing ; nor does the third do much more. Does not the fourth merely allude to the assistance of correction, &c. given by Addison to Tickell? And be- sides, when Addison, previous to Tickell's publication, informed Pope of his inten- tion, he showed no displeasm-e, nor did he till Addison preferred Tickell's ver- sion to his. (See Spence and Pope's Works, Letter to Craggs, vii. p. 302.) Dr. Warton d'eclares that a friend of Mr. Nicols was assured by Mr. Watts, the printer, that Tickell's translation of it was in his handwriting, but mucli cor- rected by Addison. (Life of Pope, p. 30.) 3. The third charge rests on evidence of a more direct kind than the others. Pope declares he received the information from the earl of Warwick, Addison's step-son. Sir William Blackstone (Notes to Kipp. Biog. Brit. art. Addison), has, with much ingenuity, endeavoiu'ed to explain away this story by showing certain anachron- isms in Pope's statement. But still, imless we suspect Pope of invention in the main particulars, the story is undoubtedly au- thentic. But may it not have been an invention of lord Warwick's, who was fond of making Pope the subject of his wit? (See Pope's Works, vol. ii. p. 360 ; Colley Gibber's Letter to Pope, 1742, p.48. As a man, it must be acknowledged that there were many defects in the cha- racter of Addison, which have perhajis been too tenderly treated by his vene- rable biographer. Much of his life was spent in flattering the great ; and he was the advocate of measures (witness the Peerage Bill) which his own judgment must have condemned. He appears to have had too little sympathy for merit in those who were poor and friendless. There appears, also, to have been a cold- heartedness about him, which prevented his ever having a friend who loved him, though all admired his respectability of character. His situation in life may have given him a certain degree of su- perciliousness, which was set down to the account of his shyness. If it was this feeling, it was a pity that he should show it to men so far superior to him in intellectual powers as Pope and Swift. So much for the unfavourable side of Addison's moral character. That on the opposite one much may be said, we rea- dily admit. To set an example of jiiety and virtue in an age more loose than we generally imagine, was no little merit. To advocate on all occasions the interests of both, in the closet and the world, by conversation and by the pen, was a ADD ADD greater ; and if there was something of ostentation in the manner, there was much of sincerity in the motive. No charge save that of occasional deep- drinking, has been made against him by his greatest enemies : on the contrary, he received from all the credit of every moral virtue. As a writer, Addison is perhaps better known than any other in^our language, with the exception of Pope. The papers which he contributed to the Tatler, to the Spectator, to the Guardian, to the Freeholder — his poetry — his drama — his numerous criticisms, are familiar to all of us as the tales which delighted us in the nursery. We all too remember the splen- did but just cidogium which Dr. Johnson has passed on liis manner and style. To his quiet, delicate humour ; to his chaste, elegant simplicity; to liis sparkling ima- gination ; to his admirable good taste ; to his constantly and inimitably sustained elegance, we cannot easily award too high a praise. Yet both as a poet and a critic, he has been much overrated. In his own time he was extravagantly flat- tered, — partly because he was unprece- dentedly fortunate ; and partly because his reputation for virtue made the good willing to heap every possible honour upon him. But, as it has been weU ob- served, " time generally puts an end to artificial and accidental fame ; and Addi- son is to pass through futurity protected only by his genius." By a great writer he has been styled " an indifterent poet, and a worse critic." In this strong opi- nion, there is doubtless much severity, but there is also some truth. In the former respect, he is not exactly " in- different." If he is feeble, he is elegant; if he has little vigour, he has much grace ; if he has no ardour, no vehe- mence, he has always imagination, which, though it does not strike, is sure to please us. If he is seldom animated, he is always agreeable ; and if he writes from books rather than from the inspira- tions of genius, he is seldom duU. A cultivated mind like liis is sm'e to inte- rest; though it may seldom dehght, it often instructs. Yet Addison is scarcely a second-rate poet. Without ardour, with- out vigour, without invention, he may be a good versifier, but he is seldom more. And even in this respect, how many in the same century surpassed him ! To say nothing of Pope, how much he is below Collins, and Goldsmith, and Johnson, and Gray ! — poets whom nobody will place in the very first rank — while in fancy and 103 vigom-, in justness of description and power of genius, he is immeasurably their inferior ! His Campaign has been styled by Warton " a gazette in rhyme," — a censure wliich Johnson regards as much too severe. It has certainly no great merit ; it is throughout a forced pro- duction ; and it has all the defects to which a poet, invita Minerva, is liable when he has none of the requisite in- spiration, when harmony is to supply the place of invention, and sound of native vigour. In such a case it is difficult to avoid bombast, and Addison has certainly not avoided it ; while the meretricious ornament which he has so lavishly be- stowed upon it, makes the poem doubly unwelcome. — As a dramatist, the merits of Addison have been variously estimated. Of Rosamond, and the Drammer, nothing need be said. " The tragedy of Cato," says Johnson, " is unquestionably the noblest production of Addison's genius." Yet it may be much doubted if this piece will stand a very severe scrutiny. Its unbounded applause may easily be traced to other considerations than its merits. As a Whig, the author was fond of scat- tering liberal sentiments over the piece ; and those of his own party — we must not forget that the audience was packed — gave undue importance to them by their shouts of appi'obation. The Tories would no more be thought enemies to liberty than the Whigs : hence they applauded the very same passages, both to show that they did not feel the blow intended for them, and that they cordially joined in the sentiment. The success of the piece, therefore, must in the first instance be attributed to party zeal, at a time Avhen that zeal was fiei'cer than it has ever been in our time. Its success since that period has been of a more doubtful kind : how often has it been performed within the last half century? It is, in fact, no drama, but a " poem in dialogue." There is nothing to rouse us. " The events are expected without solicitude, and are remembered without joy or sor- row." Pope advised its not being acted; and Johnson seems to take an unhand- some delight in reprinting the criticism of Dennis upon it. Before quitting the subject of his poetry, we must remark that he is the author of a few of the most popidar hymns in oiu* language. As a critic, Addison's main defect was a want of acquaintance with the principles of the art, and with human motives. Well has Dennis exposed the chief canon —if such it may be called — on which he ADD AD E founds his approbation of Chevy Chase, that the ballad " pleases, and ought to please, because it is natural." WagstafF's criticism of Tom Thumb is at least as good as Addison's on the deeds of the Percy and the Douglas. Yet let vis not be blind to the real merit of this writer. Before his time, criticism had been con- fined to the few ; he made it intelligible to the many. His strictm-es are not indeed remarkable for knowledge of principles ; he had read little in the great masters of the art : but they are pleasing; they are generally pervaded by good sense ; and they are adapted to the comprehension of the multitvide. It was for tlie multitude that Addison wrote ; and he did more to refine their taste, to teach them the duties and decencies of life, than all other writers put together. This is his true praise, and a high praise it is. Had his learn- ing or genius been greater, he would not have been thus useful; he might have blazed like a Dryden, but he would never have been the steady light he was to the half-educated people of his day. From the preceding remarks, oiu' opinion of AdcUson may be easily in- ferred, — that while he had neither great learning, nor great genius ; while he was in nothing original, in all things imita- tive ; while he was often feeble in senti- ment and forced in diction, he had qualities which rendered him at once the most popular and useful writer of his age and country. The followingisalist of Addison's works. His Latin poems are contained in theMu- sarum Anglicanim Analecta, 2 vols. 1 2mo, Ox. 1 699. His Translations and his Letter fi'om Italy, in Dryden's Miscellanies. Re- marks on several Parts of Italy ; Lond, 1705, 8vo. Rosamond, an Opera; Lond. 1707, 4to. Cato; Lond. 1713, 4to. After his decease, Tickell published such works as he had directed, (4 vols. Lond. 1721, 4to, ) amongst which are — Dialogues upon the Usefulness of Ancient Medals ; a pamphlet, published anonymously in 1707, entitled The Present State of the War, and the Necessity of an Augmenta- tion considered ; — five papers in the Whig Examiner, the fisst number of which was published 14th Sept. 1710 ; — a pamphlet, published anonymously in 1713, entitled, Tlie late Trial and Conviction of Count Tariff. These, together with his Free- holder, his Paraphrases of the Psalms, some miscellaneous Poems, and his con- tributions to the Tatler, Spectator, and Guardian, form Tickell's edition. Be- ]04 sides these, Steele has asci'ibed to him The Drummer, a Comedy, which was acted with indifferent success in 1715. A work entitled A Discourse on Ancient and Modern Learning, (4to, Lond. 1739,) has been also attributed to Addison. The authorship of the 10th and 39th numbers of The Lover, and a work entitled Dis- sertatio de Insignioribus Romanorum Poetis, have been also attributed to him. The Old Whig was published in 1 71 9, 4to, anonymously. Dr. Hurd published an edition of Addison's works, in 6 vols. 8vo. (Biog. Britan. edit. Kippis. Johnson's Life of Addison. Biog. Univ. Voltaire's Character of Cato. Bowles's Life of Pope, and the authorities cited in the Life. ADDISON, (Thomas,) an English- man, born A.D. 1634, and joined the society of the Jesuits July 1, 1668. He died in England, March 23, 1685. ADDISON, (G. H. 1793 — 1815,) aiithor of Indian Reminiscences, or the Bengal Moofussul Miscellany, 1837. A young man of high promise, prematurely cut off in India. His knowledge of lan- guages, his mathematical and classical attainments, his excellent qualities, and his christian character, are all highly extolled in the preface to that work. (British Mag. June 1839.) ADDY, (William,) of the seventeenth century, who is chiefly known for a Treatise on Stenography. ADEL, or ADIL, or ADILS,* the son of Ottar, king of Sweden, of the dynasty of the Yuglings, ascended the throne of the Swiar, or Swiones, or Swedes, whose capital was at Upsal, about the year 505. He was a noted pirate, who in summer visited and ra- vaged most of the coasts round the Baltic. On one occasion he descended on that of Saxony, laid waste the coimtry, took much spoil, among M'hich was Ursa, a lady of surpassing beauty. Of her the victor became enamoured, and he mar- ried her; but being expelled from his kingdom by Helge, the son of Halfdan, who reigned at Ledra, this queen fell into the power of the ■ victor, Avho also man-ied her, and the issue of this union Avas Rolfe Krake. But Ursa, who was discovered to be the daughter of Helge, returned to the court of Adils, with whom she remained during the rest of her life. On the death of Helge, in one of his pira- tical expeditions, Rolfe, or Rollo, young as he was, was acknowledged king of * This article in the Biog. Univ. is erroneous, the author of it having followed Saxo-Gramina- ticus, instead of the Icelandic writers, AD E AD E Ledra. Adils did not long survive his enemy ; he was killed by the fall of his horse. (Suorronis Sturlonis Yuglinga Saga, cap. 33. History of Denmark, &c. vol. i. Lardner's Cab. Cyc.) ADELAIDE, empress of Germany in the tenth century, was daughter of Ro- dolf II. king of Burgimdy. In. 947 she was married to Lother, son of Hugh, coimt of Provence, who had disputed with Rodolf the throne of Lombardy. This marriage was not a happy one : by Berenger, marquis of Ivrea, Lother was compelled to resign the authority in favour of his son. In 950 he died, probably through poison ; Berenger seized the government, and wished to marry Adelaide to his son Adalbert. The prin- cess refused, and was long immured in a fortress on the banks of the lake Garda. She was at length delivered, conducted to the fortress of Canossa, and married in 951 to the emperor Otho I. who had resolved to annex the northern provinces of Italy to the empire. Her conduct during the life of her second husband, and of her son Otho II, was above all praise. Her charities, however, were so considerable as to make her son complain. In 978 she had the misfortune to incm- the anger of Otho, who exiled her from the court. But in 980 she was recalled, and three years afterwards she had no little share in the administration of the regency during the minority of her grandson Otho III. The monasteries which she founded attested her piety ; her forgiveness of her personal enemies proved that she had been taught in the best of schools. She died 999, while on her way to reconcile her nephew, Rodolf II. of Burgundy, with his subjects. Her name is not in the Roman martyrology, but by the grateful clergy of the empire she received the honours of a saint. Her life was written by St. Odilo, of Clugny. ADELAIDE, (Marchioness of Suza,) was a contemporary of the celebrated Matilda, duchess of Tuscany and bene- factress of the papal see. As mother-in- law of the emperor Henry IV., she was necessarily opposed to Matilda, who so zealously took the part of Rome. The intrigues of these ladies were the most en- grossing topic of the age ; but the cha- racter of Adelaide was more amiable than that of her rival. She was the founder of the dominion of the house of Savoy in Piedmont. ADELAIDE OF FRANCE, suc- ceeded Ausganda, who had been di- vorced as wife of Louis-le-Begue. Though 105 the reigning pope would not approve the divorce, and consequently not recognise the validity of the second marriage, Charles the Simple, the offspring of this marriage, became king of France in 898. ADELAIDE OF SAVOY, daughter of the Count of Mauriana, married in 1114 Louis the Fat, king of France. By him she had six sons and one daughter. On his death she became the wife of Matthew de Montmorency, constable of France, by whom she had a son. The year before her death (1153), she procured from her husband permission to assume the veil in the abbey of Montmartre, which she had founded. ADELAIDE, or ALEID, a Dutch lady, the mistress of Albert duke of Ba- varia, rendered herself alike memorable and odious by her interference in the troubles of Germany during the latter half of the fourteenth century. William, the son of Albert, formed a plot against her, and effected her assassination in 1392. ADELAIDE OF FRANCE, (1732— 1799), daughter of Louis XV. and aunt of the unfortunate Louis XVI., was wise enough to leave France in 1791, and to settle at Rome. On the approach of the French army in 1799, she retreated to Trieste, where she died. ADELARD, or ATHELARD, monk of Bath in the reign of Henry I., deserves mention as a learned man in an age when, though a few were distinguished, the majority even of churchmen were comparatively illiterate. He travelled much, and was a good Arabic scholar. From that language he translated the Elements of Euclid before any Greek copy had been discovered. He wrote on the seven Liberal Arts, on Natui-al Philo- sophy, and Medicine. ADELARDS, chief of the Guelf fac- tion at Ferrara, in the twelfth century. We cannot, however, enter into the ob- scure broils of the Italian cities during the middle ages ; and we can only add, that besides relieving Avesna, then be- sieged by a lieutenant of Frederic Bar- barossa, he perfonned many other acts useful to his party ; and that he died 1 1 84. ADELBERT, archbishop of Bremen and Hamburgh, (1043 — 1072,) received his high dignity fi-om the hands of the emperor Henry III. and of Pope Bene- dict IX. If contemporary chronicles are to be followed, he had few of the self- denying virtues becoming the clerical state. He was ambitious, haughty, ra- pacious, venal, and an unblushing patron of simony. These qualities, however. ADE ADE were not so offensive to the German princes as liis attempts to stretcli the imperial prerogatives further than they had been carried since the days of Charlemagne. A conspiracy was formed to remove him from the councils of the empire ; and Henry was informed that he must part with either his minister or his crown. The former alternative was chosen. On his return to Bremen, Adel- bert was powerful enough to sustain a war with the duke of Saxony. It was unfortunate; but he was recompensed by being again summoned to the councUs of his imperial master. At length, how- ever, the infirmities of age creeping on him, he repaked to the monastery of Gosler, where he died. The celebrated historian Adam of Bremen (see the name) was the servant of this archbishop. ADELBERT, (Saint,) a Northumbrian missionary, and one of St. Willebrord's companions in the preaching of the gospel to the pagan inhabitants of Hol- land and Frisia. As archdeacon of Utrecht, he was a valuable assistant to his Anglo-Saxon brethren, Avho esteemed not their lives, so that they might win these dark barbarians to the worship of Christ. He died in 740. ADELBOLD, nineteenth bishop of Utrecht, to which see he was raised by St. Henry, emperor of Germany. In the earlier period of his prelacy, he was so far misled by the martial spirit of his age, as to engage in war with the court of Holland. On the return of peace, he applied himself to the proper duties of his station — to the foundation of churches and schools, and to the maintenance of discipline. He died in 1027. Of his benefactor, Henry II., he wrote a life, part of which only has descended to us ; and that so judiciously written, that we may well regret the loss of the rest. He also wrote on the sphere, the lives of some saints, and some devotional treatises. ADELBURNER, (Michael, 1702 — 1779,) a native of Nuremberg, was ori- ginally a bookseller ; but that business he abandoned to lecture at Altdorf on natu- ral philosophy, astronomy, and logic. He wrote two works on astronomy. ADELER, (C. S. 1622— 1G75,) a Nor- wegian by birth, who went to sea, and obtained great distinction by his valour. In the service of the Venetian republic, he rose to the command of a fleet, and the Mediterranean resounded with his exploits. For one great victory over the Turks (1654), he was made a knight of Malta, and rewarded by a pension of . 106 1400 ducats, to continue in his family for three generations. In 1663, he was re- called by his sovereign Frederic III., and placed over the Danish navy. He found few vessels to command, but he soon buUt some, and by his gratefid master was ennobled for his services. ADELGIS, was associated in the throne of Lombardy by his father Didier in 759. In 770 he had the honour to be- come the brother-in-law of Charlemagne by a double alliance. Yet this connexion did him harm instead of good ; it afforded that ambitious king a pretext for invading Lombardy, which he annexed to his other states. Adelgis fled to Constan- tinople, and after some years was en- trusted with an armament for the recovery of his hereditary possessions; he landed in Calabria, and was signally defeated in 788. Whether he died in the field, or returned to the capital of the Greek em- pire, is disputed. ADELGISIS, prince of Beneventinn, succeeded his brother Radelgar in 854. This principality was derived from the Lombard kingdom, of which the preced- ing personage, or rather his father Didier, was the last monarch ; and it subsisted long after the fall of the parent state. This prince passed most of his life in fighting against the Saracens, whom fanaticism and the hope of booty brought to the Italian shores. In 856 he was signally defeated by them ; and six years afterwards he became their tributary. To oppose them, he invited the aid of the Franks ; and the fortune of the war was soon changed. But from one evil he fell into another ; the Franks were nearly as rapacious as the Arabs. To rid himself of these troublesome guests, he rose against them, and made the emperor Louis his prisoner. But the Carlovingian princes were the lords of Europe ; and they were preparing to revenge the cap- tivity of their chief, when the temfied Adelgisis set him at liberty. In the sequel, peace was effected between them through the papal mediation ; but the prince had still to fight the Mohamme- dans, by whom he was more than once defeated. In 879 he was assassinated by members of his own family. (Sismondi, Histoire des Republiques Italiennes du Moyen Age, Biog. Univ.) ADELGREIFF, (J. A.) a German fanatic of the seventeenth century. AVas the son of a village clergyman near Ei- bing. His career was a remai-kable one : who would have thought that pretensions so monstrous as those which he advanced. A D E A DE would have found patient listeners ? At first he was accompanied by seven angels to banish all evil from the world, and to represent God upon earth. Next he was the king of heaven, judge of the living and the dead, and God himself. In 1638 the maniac was accused of heresy and magic, and put to death. Few rea- ders will be prepared to hear that this man was a scholar ; that he was versed in Latin, Greek, Hebrew, and several modern languages. To the very last he adhered to his imposture, by asserting that he should rise on the third day. ADELMAN, bishop of Brescia in the eleventh century, was, first, clerk of the church, next prefect of studies at Liege. He studied under the celebrated Fulbert, and had for his school-fellow the stiU more celebrated Berenger, whose treatise against transubstantiation made so great a sensation amongst the ecclesiastics of his age. Adelman answered that trea- tise, and was imitated by many other writers. A more useful work than this is his poem De Viris Illustribus sui Tem- poris, which he composed after his ele- vation to the see of Brescia in 1048. The time of his death is not exactly known ; but it was between 1057 and lOGl. ADELSTAN, or ATHELSTANE, who has the glory of being styled the first monarch of England (925 — 940), was a greater prince than any of his predecessors, excepting his grandfather Alfred ; and in power he greatly ex- ceeded him. Whether Athclstane's birth was legitimate may perhaps be doubted ; the probability seems to be that his father king Edward married his mother Egwina, — said to have been the daughter of a neat- herd, — immediately before his birth. The jealousy with which he regarded his younger brother Edwin, whom he ba- nished, and, if report be true, endea- deavoured to destroy, appears to confirm this conjecture. In the second year of his reign he married his sister Edith to Sigtric the Danish king of Northumber- land. On Sigtric's death, he invaded the province, and incoii>oi'ated it with the kingdoms of the polyarchy. He was also the first Saxon prince who established his superiority over Cumberland. Over Scot- land, too, as far as the Clyde and the Frith of Forth, he was the lord paramount. The battle of Brunenburg, in which lie signally defeated the united Irish, Scots, and Danes, is well known to every rea- der of our history. It was indeed a splen- did triumph, and was as much bewailed in Scandinavia as it was valued in Eng- 107 land. From this moment the victor was no longer satisfied with the title of his ancestors, "King of the West Saxons," he assumed that of " King of the Eng- lish Saxons," or "King of the English;" and more than once we find him in- vested with the higher one, " King of all Britain." His generosity was equal to his power : three princes, Hako the Good of Norway, Alan duke of Brittany, and Louis d'Outre-mer of France, were edu- cated at his court. (Saxon Chronicle. Turner's Anglo-Saxons.) ADELUNG, (J. C. 1734—1806,) a learned and useful German writer, espe- cially on subjects of philology. A native of Spantekow, in Pomerania, he finished his studies at the university of Halle ; became professor at Erfurt, then removed to Leipsic, where he remained imtil 1787, when, being nominated libra- tian to the elector of Saxony, he re- moved to Dresden, where he died. It was at Leipsic that most of his great labours were accomplished. Of these the most considerable is his Grammatical and Critical Dictionary, which is an at- tempt to do for Germany what the aca- demicians della Cruzca, and those of Paris, had done for Italy and France. It is much more ample than either ; the first four volumes reaching to 1800 pages each. In another respect it differs from them ; it gives, like the dictionary of Johnson, the etymology of words, and is, in this respect, far superior to the English work. Perhaps too, as the French and German critics assert, it is superior in the definition, filiation, and acceptation of words. But in other respects it is de- cidedly inferior : it does not exhibit equal judgment in the choice of writers from whom the words are taken ; it does not give so good an historical view of the progressive use of words ; and it has more chasms than we should expect to find. Though a new edition of this work was published, with great aug- mentations (Leipsic, 1793 — 1801), still much remains to be done before it can be called complete. Yet it is a stu- pendous work, and one sufficient to im- mortalize any writer. Adelung Avas a man of words ; his whole life was passed in deiiving, analyzing, and comparing them. One of his most useful publica- tions was the abridgment of Ducange and Charpentier, under the title of Glos- sarium Manuale ad Scriptores Mediaj et Infimas Latinitatis. (6 vols. 8vo. Halle, 1772—1784.) Three of his grammars, which are designed to explain every thing AD E AD G that should be known of his native lan- guage, have been received with much applause. Two of them are little more than an abridgment of the first (2 vols. 8vo. Leipsic, 1782), which will attest the erudition of the author for ages to come. Connected with the German language are some other publications, which, thougli of less importance, have their use for natives, and we fear for natives only. His Cyclopaedia of all the Arts, Sciences, and Trades, which minister to the Necessities or Pleasures of Life (4 parts, Leipsic,1778 — 1788), is, though on a diminutive scale, exceedingly usefid ; since it is designed rather to explain the origin and signification of the terms em- ployed in those arts, than the arts them- selves. His History of Human Folly, his Essay on the Civilization of the Human Race, and his History of Phi- losophy, have no great merit : in these subjects the author was not at home; but in his ti-eatise on German Ortho- graphy, and in his Mithi'idates, he was rmrivalled. The latter is an attempt to establish affinities between all known languages, and to prove some one of them to be the common root of all. The first volume only, which is conversant with the Asiatic languages, is the un- aided work of Adelung : for the second, which comprises the Basque, Celtic, German, &c. he collected materials, and the whole was completed by Vater, who detected some curious affinities between the Lettish, Laponic, Finnish, Hun- garian, Albanian, Wallachian, &c. The third volume, also under the superintend- ence of Vater, contains the languages of the New World. In this branch of the subject Adelung had no concern ; and the materials, we believe, were chiefly collected by the celebrated traveller Humboldt. Adelung was an extra- ordinary man ; he has been called a uni- versal one ; and so he is, if the term is to embrace the derivations and affinities of words. He was never married : his desk was his wife ; the seventy volumes which he published, or wrote, were his children. Yet he loved good cheer ; he was parti- cularly fond of choice foreign wines ; and his cellar, which he called his Bib- liotheca Selectissima, had as much of his regard, and probcibly of his attention, as any other room in his house. He was a hard student through life, often read- ing fourteen hours a day. His nephew, Fiiedrich von Adelung, imperial counsellor of state in Russia, &c. has also highly distinguished himself in 108 philological researches, especially by his Uebersicht aller Bekannten Sprachen, Petersburg!!, 1820, 4to. ; and his Essay on Ancient German Poetry, Konigsberg, 1796. (Biog. Univ. Foreign Quarterly Rev. passim. Wolff's Cyclopadie.) ADEN, (Guillaume,) a physician of Thoulouse in the seventeenth century ; wrote several medical books. ADENES, or, as his name was some- times spelt, Adans, one of the most celebrated of the French poets who flourished during the thirteenth century. He was born in the duchy of Brabant, about the year 1240, and exhibited so mucli poetic genius, even in his child- hood, that he obtained the especial patronage of Henry III., duke of Flan- ders and Brabant, who was not only the great friend of j^oets, but also a distin- guished poet himself. Henry watched over the education of young Adenes, and, when he attained a sufficient age, made him his own minstrel. On the death of Henry in 1260, the friendship whicli the poet had received from him was continued by his children ; and Marie of Brabant, now become queen of France, took him to Pai-is. His contemporaries seem to have shown their esteem for the talents of Adenes by making him king of the minstrels, and he is most com- monly designated by tlie title of Adenes le Roi. We owe to tlie pen of tliis poet four considerable romances, Cleomades, Ogier-le-Danois, Buevon de Commarchis, and Berte aux grans Pies. Of the latter, a very neat edition has been recently pub- lished by M. Paidin Paris. The romance of Cleomades, the last of his productions, consists of no less than nineteen thousand lines ; in the composition of this poem he tells us that he was encouraged and assisted by his patroness queen Marie and the lady Blanche of Artois. ADENI. See Solomon. ADEODATUS, (St.) was elected pope in 614, as successor to Boniface IV. Of his sliort pontificate of three years, scarcely a record remains. Another pontiff" of this name was called to the chair of St. Peter in 673. His reign too was short. He is praised by Anastasius. ADERED. See Solomon. ADGANDESTES. See Arminius. ADGIL I. (d. 710), was the first Christian king of Frisia, to which dignity he was raised by Clothaire, king of the Franks. To dilFuse the new religion was one of his laudable attempts : an- other was to raise embankments for the AD G ADH protection of the land against the per- petually encroaching sea. The second prince of this name fol- lowed a line of conduct nearly opposite, and did all he could to bring back the people to the old superstition. ADHADEDDAULAH, (936—983,) fourth prince of the dynasty of the Booides ; succeeded his uncle, Imrad Eddaulah, in the throne of Persia, m 949. But it was in conjmaction with his father, Roku Ed- daulah, that he reigned for seventeen years. His exploits were more important than they were honourable. If we except the defeat of Sidtan Mansoor, in Kho- rasan, which was a patriotic act, we find little to praise in his early conduct. When called to defend his kinsman, Az Eddaulah, sovereign of Bagdat, he effect- ed that object, but coveted that city, which he would have retained but for the menaces of his father. After that father's death he resumed his ambitious views, marched to Bagdat, expelled the king, defeated the troops which were brought against him, and made some other im- portant conquests. He was a great patron of learning, and his fame was great throughout all Asia. It was now that he made some amends for his former injustice, by supporting the halt, the blind, the orphans, the widows of his states ; he founded hospitals, mosques, and other superb buildings. But in the midst of his prosperity he was a prey to an incurable distemper, which allowed him no rest, and which, ere long, proved fatal. His true name Avas FanaChosroo; the other was a title of honom- bestowed by the khalif. ADHED LEDIN ALLAH, (Abu Mob. Abd.) fourteenth and last khalif of the Fatimite dj'uasty, and the eleventh that reigned in Egyjit ; ascended the throne in 1160. He was a weak prince ; he was governed first by Thelai, then by Zarik, and lastly by Shawer, his viziers. The khalif of Bagdat, who descended from the house of Abbas, promised great rewards to the man who should rid the Mohammedan world of this anti-khalif. Adhed, in alarm, implored the succour of Amaury, Christian king of Jerusalem. A better ally was Nooreddin, atabec of SjTia, who sent an army to the aid of the secluded khalif. In this army was Sa- ladin, destined to so much celebrity in the annals of the crusaders. The trai- torous Shawer was slain ; another vizier succeeded ; and then Saladin, who was more perfidious than the rest. Insti- gated by Nooreddin, by the khalif of 109 Bagdat, and still more by his own ambi- tion, he caused the name of that khalif to appear in the public prayers, to the exclusion of Adhed's. The dynasty, therefore, of the Fatimites, which had reigned 261 years, was at an end, (a.d. 1171.) The dethroned khalif, who was sick dm-ing this revolution, did not sur- vive it a week. — See Saladin. (D'Her- belot, Bibliotheque Orientale, Michaud, Histoire des Croisades.) ADHELM, or ADELHELMUS, otherwise written Ealdhelm, and also Aldhelm, a celebrated luminary of the Anglo-Saxon chinch, and the first of the Saxon ecclesiastics that distinguished himself for learning. The exact year of his birth is perhaps not now ascertain- able, but his family was of princely blood, his father being a kinsman of king Ina. His early studies took place in Kent, under the superintendence of the cele- brated Adrian, who had been sent over by the sovereign pontiff Vitalian, to assist archbishop Theodore in adminis- tering the duties of the pi-ovince of Can- terbury. Under the guidance of this able instructor, he became well versed in Greek and Latin. He then retired to Malmesbury, where an Irishman, named Maidulf, had founded a monastery of the poorest kind ; the means of the monks being so scant, that they not imfrequently had considerable difficulty to provide themselves with sustenance. After a while he returned to Kent, and resumed his studies imder Adrian, till the feverish state of his health obliged him to relin- quish them, and again retire to Malmes- buiy, probably in the year 666. From this retreat he addressed several affec- tionate letters to his old instructor, in which he mentions the subjects of his various pursuits — Roman jurisprudence, Latin versification, astronomy, astrology, and arithmetic, which last was, as he tells us, a most laborious science ; and if we consider that at that period all cal- culations had to be performed by the help only of the seven letters I, V, X, L, C, D, M, we shall at once admit the jus- tice of his remark. His success, how- ever, seems to have been complete in all the branches of his varied applica- tion, as his learned reputation was so great, that persons came from Scotland and Fi'ance to study under his guidance. He was ordained priest by Eleutherius, bishop of Winchester, between the years 670 and 675, in which latter year he was raised to the abbot's seat at Malmesbury. In 674 queen Sexburga died, and the AD H ADH government of Wessex devolved upon jEscuine and Centwine, both of the royal blood of Mercia. These prmces, at the request of the new abbot, rebuilt the abbey of Malmesbury upon a large and magnificent scale, and liberally endowed it for the support of its learned inmates ; and its privileges were confirmed by Eleutherius, wlio had himself hand- somely contributed towards the endow- ment. In 689 Adhelm was at Rome, whither he had gone in the escort of king Ceadwealla, who went thither for baptism ; and where he obtained from pope Sergius a grant exempting his abbey from episcopal jurisdiction, and confer- ring on the monks the privilege of electing their abbot. WhUst abbot of Malmes- bury, he was chosen by a West Saxon synod, convened for the promulgation of Ina's laws, to write a treatise against the British mode of celebrating Easter, and against their mode of tonsiu'e. His trea- tise, which is said by Bede to have made many converts, Malmesbvuy regrets is lost ; there is, however, extant a letter from him to Gerontius, king of Cornwall, on the subject, which has occasionally moved the spleen of the centmiators of Magdeburg. The English reader may find it translated in Father Cressy, who considers this letter to be the treatise itself. Adhelm continued abbot of Malmesbury till 705, when Hsedde, bishop of Winchester, dying, his extensive dio- cese was divided between Daniel and Adhelm, the latter receiving the western portion with the title of bishop of Sher- born. For four years, says Bede, he administered the duties of his diocese with the most strenuous diligence, and died May 25, 709, near Westwood. His remains were removed to Mahnesbury for interment, and at whatever places they rested in the journey, crosses were erected by the command of St. Egwin, who assures us that he had been informed of his death by revelation, and accord- ingly had hastened to superintend the removal of the body. His chief extant works have been printed in the thirteenth vol. of the Bibliotheca Maxima Patrum, and in the eighth of the Magna Biblioth. Vett. Patt. The latter is the work now before the present writer. It contains the poem De Laude Virginum, addressed to the abbess Maxima ; the poem De octo principalibus Vitiis ; the book of iEnig- mas, in verse ; and also certain Mono- stichs, attributed to him by Martin del Rio the Jesuit, for no other reason than because mention is made in them of 110 " the eight vices," an expression which of course might be used by any imitator of Adhelm. There also is printed his prose treatise De Laudibus Virginitatis. His letter to Gerontius has been already mentioned as displeasing the centuria- tors ; and it must be owned that it is somewhat at variance with modern no- tions of liberalism,* though it contains, nevertheless, much that is excellent and praiseworthy. It has been printed in Gale, as have also some other of his works. His Saxon poems, of which none are known to survive, received a very high encoffliiun from Alfred the Great, and may therefore be considered as works of considerable merit. A long list of other works is given by the centuria- tors, but it cannot be depended upon, being in some parts palpably eri'oneous. His writings are highly praised by Bede, and after him by Malmesbury ; and, in- deed, for a long period he seems to have been in the very highest repute. And, doubtless, it is highly to his credit, that he was the first among his countrymen who excelled in Latin composition. But however over-estimated he may have been by his contemporaries and some succeeding generations, he appears to the writer of this notice under-rated by the pi-esent age. Dr. Lingard says " his merit is not great;" and Mr. Sliaron Turner gives a selection of specimens from his works, to show his inflated and bombastic style. The specimens are perhaps hardly fair samples of his general style, which was not always so overwrought. It must, however, be admitted, that his language is very fre- quently overloaded with gorgeous rhe- toric ; still we must admire the genius and taste that could aiTange svich an exuberance of ornament with so mucli judgment and elegance, for though he may sometimes weary with the copious- ness of his figurative expatiations, lie rarely, if ever, nauseates or disgusts. His prose compositions show a great ac- quaintance witli the Scriptures and the principal fathers ; and his poems display a knowledge of the chief Latin poets, from whose works he occasionally bor- rows passages Avith ingenuity and suc- cess, especially from Virgil. Let him be weighed in the balance of just and libe- ral criticism, and allowance be made for all the disadvantages of one who is treading on unbroken ground, and the father of Anglo-Saxon literature will be * The British were still more so In their conduct, if he gives a fair account of them. ADH ADI found not wanting of the just weight and measure of a very great man. ADHEMAR, (Guillaume,) a trouba- dour of the thirteenth century ; was of a knightly family, hut destined to remain poor. He therefore became troubadour, jongleur, and lastly, monk of the order of Grammont. Eighteen of his songs are in the public libraries of Paris. AUHEMAR DE MONTEUIL, (Lam- bert de,) prince of Orange, was chief of that ancient and illustrious family. In 785 he married Madelina of Burgundy, and in her right obtained vast estates in that province. '^He was a great enemy of the Arabs, whom he frequently defeated on the shores of the Mediterranean. By Charlemagne he was created duke of Genoa in 800. 2. Another noble of this name and fa- mily was bishop of Puy, but not until he had distinguished himself in arms. And after he had embraced the ecclesiastical state, and reached the dignity of bishop, his propensities were no less martial than before. In 1095 he appeared at the coimcil of Clermont, assumed the cross, collected as many clerical and lay war- riors as he could, and, under the banner of Raymond, count of Thoulouse, set out for the Holy Land. The intrigues of the crusaders with Alexis Comnenus, Greek emperor, must be sought in the history of those extraordinary expeditions. At the siege of Nice he gi-eatly distinguished himself; at that of Antioch he proved still more clearly that he was a brave wan-ior, a great general, and a deep poli- tician. Perhaps he was too deep an one to be honest ; for there is some reason to infer that he was no stranger to the pious fraud which produced the lance that had pierced our Saviom-'s side. This fraud saved the Christians, who were in a woful con- dition in beleaguered x\ntioch ; and who, confiding in the virtue of the relic, now slew myriads of the misbelievers. While this great battle was fighting, Adhcmar was in the van, bi-andishing ihe wondtiful lance, and exhorting the Christians to conquer or to die. Nor did he tiiist in this fraud alone ; some horsemen clad in white, who suddenly appeared on a neighbouring hill, and whom the bishop declared to be a celestial company, headed by Saints George and Deme- trius, were not brought there by chance. The new vigour infused into the Christians by their arrival, led to the splendid suc- cess of this day. Adhemar died of a con- tagious disease at Antioch, though Tasso makes him fall at the siege of Jerusalem. Ill His death was deeply lamented by the ciiisaders, who were soon notorious for want of discipline, for ill-concerted mea- sures, and, consequently, for disasters. (Michaud, Histoire des Croisades. Biog. Univ.) 3. A third noble of this name and fa- mily was made bishop of Metz in 1327. He was no less martial than his kin- dred chiefs ; and he doubtless esteemed it an honour to measure weapons with Raoul, duke of Lorraine, the most cele- brated warrior of France. The fortune of this and a subsequent war, was du- bious ; in a third campaign he lost 2000 men ; but in a fourth he was victorious. Pacified for a time by Philip de Valois, king of France, he was quiet until the death of Raoul at the battle of Cressy ; but he found other enemies in the duchess de Blois, and the duke de Bar. He was one of the gi'eatest wan-ior bishops of France ; and how he could find time for the business of his diocese, we need not inquire. He died in 1361. ADHERBAL,the general of Carthage, who, in the year before Christ 250, so signally defeated the Roman fleet under Claudius, off the coast of Sicily. Ninetj'- three vessels, and 8000 men, and 20,000 prisoners, were lost to the Romans. ADHERBAL, son of Micipsa, one of the Numidian kings, who, conjointly with his brother Hiempsal and his cousin the notorious Jugurtha, divided that country between them. The last, governed by ambition, and unmindful of the genero- sity which had placed him on an equality with the two fonner, assassinated Hi- empsal, expelled Adherbal, and became monarch of the state. As an ally of the republic, Adherbal applied to the senate for redress. The members, gained by the gold of Jugurtha, decided that the usui-per should have the most valuable portion of the ten'itory. Adherbal re- tiu'ned, was again assailed by Jugurtha, was defeated, besieged, obliged to capi- tulate, and, in defiance of the article which guaranteed his life, put to death, A. c. 113. ADIMANTUS, an Athenian general, was the only one that, dui-ing the Pelo- ponnesian war, resisted the order to amputate the right thumb of the captives. In retimi, when the Athenian fleet was captured by Lysander, (a. c. 403,) he was the only one not put to death by the \'ictors. There was also a heretic of this name, in the third century, a disciple of Manes, who wrote a book to shew that the New AD I AD O Testament contradicts tlie Old, and con- sequently that both cannot be of divine authority. It was answered by St. Au- gustine ; and in this, as in many other cases where the poison has perished, the antidote has survived. ADIMARI. There are many Italians of this name, all sprung from a Guelf family of Florence, which from 1010 to 173G, never ceased to be before ' the public eye. 1. Tegghiaio Aldohrandi, a magistrate of the thirteenth century, was much es- teemed for his firmness, and for his love of justice ; but he had one great vice, for which Dante places him in hell. (See the Notes to Dante, Infern. vi. 79 ; xvi. 40—46.) 2. Forese, who in the following cen- tury fought nobly for the Guelf party in Lombardy and Naples. 3. Alessandro, (1579—1649,) a very middling poet, produced, between 1637 and 1642, six collections of fifty sonnets each, which he had the modesty to dig- nify by the names of six Muses : he would probably have run through the whole nine, had he received encouragement. He was called a good Greek scholar ; yet in his bad metrical translation of Pindar, he followed the Latin version of Erasmus Schmidt. (See Tiraboschi, viii. 462.) 4. Ludovico, (1644 — 1708,) born at Naples, educated at Pisa, died at Flo- rence, where he was professor ; was es- teemed in his day for his satirical poetry. Besides sonnets, hymns, and at least one drama, he wrote five satires against women. Boileau allows that there were three good ones in his time ; Adimari does not know one, and he is quite sure that his readers do not. Tiraboschi (ibid.) says his version of the Penitential Psalms was much admired. ADLER, (Philip, fl. 1518,) an cngi-aver of great merit, most probably a German. He chiefly practised etching, and scarcely used the graver. He appeal's to have taken up the art of etching while in its infancy, and to have promoted its growth most wonderfully. He probably may have led the way for the Hopfers, and after them for that excellent artist Hollar. Strutt (Diet. Engravers) supposes him to have made much use of the prints marked with a W, having an o on the top of it, which are generally consi- dered to be of Michael Wolgemuth, the master of Albert Durer. Some fine etchings of his exist on sacred subjects, (Strutt.) ADLERBETH, (Gudmund G. 1751 112 — 1818,) a learned Swede, educated at Upsal, who devoted himself to law and poetry — two rather dissimilar pursuits, and also to history and antiquities. In 1809 he was made councillor of state, and baron ; and was occupied in the revision of the fundamental laws of the kingdom. In 1813 he retired from his official duties, and gave up the rest of his life to literature, especially poetry. His original contributions, however, were trifling ; but his translations from Racine, Horace, Virgil, and Ovid, are much esteemed. ADLERFELDT, (Gust, de) a native of Stockholm, the historian of Charles XII, Avho accompanied that prince in all his operations down to the battle of Pultawa, whe-re he perished. He left a kind of joiur- nal, which fell into the hands of a prince of Wurtemberg then with the Swedish army, who placed it amongst the MSS. of Stutgard. It next became the property of the author's son, who translated it into French, and it was published at Am- sterdam, 1740, under the title of Histoire Militaire de Charles XII. An addition, comprehending the details of that fatal battle, and of the monarch's exile in Turkey, is by another eye-witness. ADLUNG, (I. 1699—1762,) professor of music at Erfurt, and organist, wrote on the principles of harmony and the construction of organs. Two of his works bear a high repution, viz. The In- troduction to Musical Science, Erfurt, 1758 ; and The Seven Musical Stars, Berlin, 1768. ADLZHEITER, (John, 1596— 1662,) a statesman of Bavaria, is better known for his history of that province from the earliest period to the year 1662, under the title of Annales Boicae Gentis. (Mon. 1662.) ADMIRAL, (Henri, 1744—1794,) a peasant who went to Paris to earn his bread by menial laboui', will be remem- bered in the annals of the Revolution, for his unsuccessful attempt against the lives of Robespierre and Collot d'Her- bois, and for the coolness with which he met his fate. ADO, (St. 800—875,) archbishop of Vienne, one of the most respectable churchmen of his age, was remarkable for his pi-ivate devotions, for his episco- pal zeal, for the encouragement of litera- ture. He wrote some valuable works, among which are a Chronicle, a Mar- tyrology, and the Lives of several Saints. The Chronicle has been often printed alone ; the rest of his works have ap- ADO ADO peared in Canisiiis, Bollandus, and Ma- billon. ADOLF II. (d. 1164), Connt of Hol- stein, embraced the party of Henry the Proud, duke of Bavaria, against that of Albert the Boar, who contended for the possession of Saxony. He took Lubeck, but had the mortification to see it re- taken by Henry the Lion, with whom he quai-relled. He fell at the siege of a fortress in Pomerania. ADOLF OF NASSAU, king of the Romans from 1292 to 1298, was raised to that dignity through the inti-igues of his kinsman, the archbishop of Mentz, con- trary to the wish or the expectation of the German people. The choice, however, lay not with the people, but with the seven great dignitaries called electors, whom it was not difficult to bribe. Like some of his predecessors, he made con- cessions enough to the men who could bestow a throne, especially the spiritual electors. But he promised more than he had the power to perform, and they were soon willing to undo their own work. Nor was his administration such as to rally round him the heai'ts of the people. Mindful only of his own or of his family aggrandizement ; more ready to sell than to bestow offices ; venal in every thing, corrupt in every thing, without any one great quality to counterbalance his many defects, he was at once hated and de- spised. To crowned heads he was equally base ; witness the subsidy he received from our Edward I. on the condition of his going to war with the king of France, yet his refusal either to fulfil that condi- tion or to return the money. Of his impopularity with the great and the little, advantage was taken by his rival, Albert, duke of Austria : the electors deposed him, and Albert was raised to the va- cant dignity. It was not to be expected that Adolf would quietly submit ; he had many kinsmen, many vassals, many de- pendents, and he was enabled to bring an army into the field. He was met by Albert, and in the vicinity of Worms he fell into an unlamented grave. ADOLF X. count of Cleves and La Marche, the second son of Adolf IX. count de la Marche, was young when elected to the see of Munster in 1357. This was a turbulent churchman, and generally engaged in war. Nor was his private conduct good. Summoned to answer for his crimes before the Pope at Avignon, he resigned his dignity, married, succeeded to the two lordships we have mentionedj and left many cliil- voi,. I 113 dren, of whom, the eldest, called after his name, became duke of Cleves. Died, 1394. ADOLF I. (1371 — 1448), duke of Cleves, and son of the preceding, was raised to the dignity by the emperor Sigismund, in 1417. He had to sustain a long war with his brother Gerard, for the possession of La Marche ; but a com- promise was at length effected. By marrying Maria, daughter of John the Intrepid, duke of Burgundy, he enlarged his states and his power. ADOLF VIII. (d. 1459), duke of Sleswic, deserves praise for his modera- tion in an age more than usually ambi- tious. He fled from grandeur, he lived frugally, he laboured for the happiness of his people, and refused the crown of Denmark when oftered to him in 1448 ; recommending his nephew Christian I., who was ci'owned in that year. ADOLF, (1438—1477,) the only son of Arnold, duke of Gueldres, is known only for his detestable conduct towards his father, against whom he was a rebel all his life, and whom at one time he succeeded in imprisoning. The duke, however, was released and restored. This unnatural son was in his turn a captive, and on his enlargement lie fell in an ob- scure fray. ADOLF I. duke of Holstein, (1526 — 1586,) son of Frederic, king of Den- mark, was a very warlike prince, whose name appears constantly in the military annals of Germany. ADOLF, (John, 1685—1744,) duke of Saxony, was much esteemed both as a wai'rior and a politician, by Marlborough, Charles XII. Augustus of Poland, and the emperor Charles VI. His exploits constantly recur in the history of the times. ADOLF FREDERIC, (of Holstein Entin,) king of Sweden, succeeded Fre- deric I. in 1751. His reign was a pro- sperous one ; he was a great patron of literature and science ; he founded schools and hospitals, and he endeavoured to prove himself the father of his people. But he had to contend with the aristo- cracy, who aimed at the establishment of an oligarchy, and left him a mere shadow of power. Some adherents, who vainly attempted to restore the power of the monarchy, he had the mortification to see beheaded. He died in 1771, with the character of a good but weak piince. ADOLFI. There were two brothers, natives of Bergamo, of this name, both painters. 1. Giacomo (1682—1741). , ADO ADR 2. Ciro (16S3— 1758). They both pamted scriptural subjects, and adorned the churches of Bergamo with many ad- mired pictures and frescoes. ADORNO. Italy has many sons of this name. 1. Gabriele, doge of Genoa, (1363 — 1370,) the successor of Simon Bocca- negra. Hitherto the dignity had -been held by nobles, and Gabriele was the first plebeian, or rather humble citizen, who was raised to it. In this election, the object of the citizens was to end the contests for power which had so long distinguished the magistrates of noble family, and for ever to exile them from the honom-able ofiices of the republic. It was soon found, however, that ple- beians like the Adorni, could be quite as restless, as selfish, as turbulent as the Dorias or Spinolas. After seven years' administration, this doge was exiled. 2. Antonietto, brother or son of the preceding, held the same dignity four times between 1384 and his death in 1397. He was an able and most ambi- tious magistrate, and a principal actor in the Avarlike events of Italy. His triumphs over the African pirates do him much greater honour than even his deliverance of pope Urban VI. But in one respect his policy was pernicious, — that wliich led him to place the republic under the pro- tection of Fi'ance. 3. Giorgio, son of the preceding, elected to the ducal throne in 1413, held it only two years when he resigned, from his inability to repress the contending fac- tions. 4. Rajfaelle, son of the preceding, be- came doge in 1443. He had to sustain a war against the duke of Milan and the king of Arragon and Naples, until he made peace with the latter. But he too was unable to contend with faction, and in three years he resignedhis dignity. (See Giustiniani, Stor. di Genov. 1. v.) Tira- boschi (vi. 519) supposes it probable that Raftaelle, after resigning the ofiice of doge, became a professor of laws, 5. Barnabas, seized in 1447 the seat which his kinsman had abdicated. He reigned a month, and was expelled. G. Prospero, expelled the French in 14G1. Jealous of the rival house of Fre- goso, he was imprisoned by one of its members. The Milanese released him, but he soon quaiTelled with and defeated them. At length he was expelled by his rivals, and died in 1486. 7. jintonicito became doge through the interest of France in 1513, and again 114 through that of his family in 1522. He was abler than many of his predecessors, but he was no less intriguing : dissatisfied with France, he threw himself on Charles V. by whom he was maintained in his post until 1527, when Genoa was taken by the French. Such was the fate of this republic, that when there was no domestic rebellion, it was sure to be oppressed by France, or Spain, or Milan, or some one of its more powerful neighbours. In 1528, Doria espoused the cause of the emperor ; and Genoa again acknowledged the protection of Charles. These changes were melancholy ; they were justly attri- buted to the intrigues of the Fregosi and Adorni, whose administration had been more calamitous than that of the nobles ; the law which excluded nobles from the magistracy was aboHshed, and the two plebeian families were banished. (The above sketches from Sismondi, Histoire des Republiques Italiennes ; and from Biog. Univ.) 8. Francesco, (1531 — 1586,) a Jesuit, of the same family, studied in Portugal, was called to Rome, where he professed theology until he was nominated prefect of the monastic establishment at Milan. His next elevation was to the provincial administration of Lombardy. His talents, however, were not of a high order : his treatise on ecclesiastical discipline, his sermons, his Latin verses, &c. exhibit, we believe, nothing that could raise him from obscimty. ADRAMAN, better known as " the Butcher's Son of Marseilles," was taken in infancy by the Tm-ks, circumcised, robed, and turbaned. His abilities raised him to the dignity of pasha of Rhodes. He Avas strangled, however (1706), by order of his Turkish master; and though his innocence was afterwards dis- covered, what could this avail him ? It might, however, avail some one of his twenty-two sons. ADRAMYTHUS, king of Lydia, founder of the city which bore his name. ADRASTUS. He lived at the be- ginning of the second centuiy, was a Peripatetic, and the avithor of some com- mentaries on Aristotle, which have been lost. A work of his, however, Ilfpt 'Ap^oviKcov, is said to be still preserved in some libraries, (Schoell. Hist. Lit. v. p. 159.) ADRETS, (F. de Beaumont, Baron des, 1513 — 1586,) a name for ever famous in the civil wars of France. Whether at the head of the Protestants or the Roman Catholics, Avhether in the communion of ADR ADR Calvin or of the pope, he was equally celebrated for his valour, for his restless activity, for his abUity, and for his ati'o- cities. While general of the Protestants, he took, amongst other cities, Montbrison. He put the inhabitants to the sword, ex- cept such as took refuge in the forti-ess. When this was reduced, he beheaded many of the defenders : the rest he would make to leap from the summit of a high tower, as a kind of dessert after dinner. There he stood, noticing the successive descents of the victims. One soldier, forced like the rest to take a short run before he leaped, stopped short at the front of the wall. Des Adrets growled. He did so a second time. " No more of this," cried the baron : " I have no time to lose in foolery. These two times thou hast failed!" "Baron," replied the soldier, " I will allow you ten before you leap !" His wit saved him. It was because he did not think his services sufficiently reward- ed, that Des Adi-ets embraced the royal party. " Hitherto I have made Hugo- nots," he observed ; " now I will mimake them !" In his second party, however, he was not so fortunate ; he fell rather below the expectations fonned of him ; and he had the mortification to hear of his two sons, both Protestants, being killed by his new friends — one in the massacre of St. Bartholomew, the other at Rochelle. Much exaggeration has ex- isted relative to this man, but the Biog. Univ. states that his name is even now not pronounced in Dauphine without shuddering. There are two other lives of him, one by AUard (Grenoble, 1675, 12mo), the other by J.C.Martin, 8vo. 1803. (Lacretelle, Histoire des Guerres de la Religion.) ADREVALD, a monk of Flemy in the ninth centiuy, acqmred some repu- tation by his writings. The chief of these was a Ti'eatise on the Eucharist against Johannes Scotus. But more in- teresting are his lives of some saints, disfigm-ed as they are by puerile mira- cles. Amidst rubbish of this description, there are always some diamonds. ADRIA, (J. J. d. 1560,) a physician of Palenno, wrote on the plague, on the use of the lancet and the bath, and on the topography of Mazara, his native district. ADRIAN, (P. jElius, 76—138,) em- peror of Rome, was born, according to some, in Spain, to others, in Rome ; but all agree that on both sides he was of Spanish descent. He was only ten years old when he lost his father, ^lius Adri- anu3 Afer, but the place was well sup- 115 plied by his tutors. He served in Spain until he was recalled by his kinsman Trajan. Towards the close of Diocle- sian's reign, he led the second auxiliary legion into Moesia. There he is said to have learned from an astrologer that he should one day command the Roman world. If this were tiaie, it woidd only prove that he was ambitious at an early period, and that whoever flattered it, was sm-e to be rewarded ; but probably, like many other instances of the same kind, it was a post, not a j3rediction. When his kinsman Trajan was adopted by Nerva, though he was not much loved by that kmsman, his prospects bi-ight- ened : when Trajan ascended the throne, the empress Plotina procured him the hand of Julia Sabina, a princess of the imperial family. His promotion was now rapid : he was first quasstor ; in the twelfth year of Trajan's reign, he accom- panied that monarch into Dacia ; he was soon consul, ti'ibune of the people ; and in a second expedition of Trajan, he dis- tinguished himself so much, that he re- ceived from the imperial hands the very diamond which Trajan had received from Nerva. This he regarded as an earnest of his fuhu-e adoption. That the em- peror had the intention, is probable enough ; but whether it was can-ied into execution, is very much disputed. Adrian, during his prsetorship at Rome, and arch- onship at Athens, had no intimation of it ; nor are we sm"e that while governor of Syr-ia he was acquainted with it. Some writers assert that Plotina forged the letters of adoption while Trajan was on the bed of death in Syria. The conduct of Adrian after liis accession to the em- pire (a. D. 117) would seem to confirm the inference. He ■wrote from Antioch to the senate, that his soldiers had. forced him to assume the dignity ; he remitted many taxes ; he pardoned all his enemies ; he shared the fatigues of liis soldiers ; he lived fiiigally as they ; on them, and all his chief adherents, he bestowed ex- ti'aordinary largesses ; and he greatly improved the administration of the laws. These acts look like those of an usui-per. His conduct in other respects was distin- guished by deep policy. He would not prosecute the war which Trajan had im- dertaken, because he was jealous of that monarch's glory, and because his soldiers were averse from it ; yet, to prove that he had no jealousy, he caused the honours of a triumph which the senate wished to offer him, to be paid to the statue of his predecessor. Hainng remitted all the 12 ADR ADU arrears of taxes during the sixteen years preceding, and burnt the hooks, that no- body might be asked for them, he would now add military to his civil glory. He humbled the Sarmatians, and he might now, he thought, punish some of his personal enemies ; in a letter to the senate he denounced foiu- consular citizens, whom tliat obsequious body put to death. The Romans grumbled ; Adrian returned, and disavowed the act. His next great object was to travel over the chief provinces of his empire : he would be like the sun, which sees every thing. First he repaired to Gaid, then to Ger- many, then to Britain, where, to repress the incursions of the Caledonians, he built the celebrated wall from the river Eden in Cumberland, to the Tyne, about eighty miles long. Wherever he went, he left monuments of his magnificent taste behind him : Gaul and Spain, in particular, were enriched with them. In Africa he learned the death of Plotina : he returned to Rome, placed her amongst the gods, and proceeded to Egjrpt. There he rebuilt Pompey's tomb. But there too he disgraced himself by his sensu- ality, and by his superstition : to prolong his life, the boy Antinous, the favourite of Adrian, sacrificed himself. To Anti- nous temples were erected, altars blazed, and priests sacrificed, while the emperor bemoaned the catastrophe more than if a favourite wife had died. When his sister Paulina paid the debt of nature, there was little pomp for lier ; and the contrast was displeasing even to the corrupt Romans. The Jews now re- volted : by Julius Severus Jerusalem was retaken, and reduced to ashes, a. d. 136 ; but the reduction of the other places, and the complete resubjugation of the country, occupied many years. In this war above half a million Jews were slain ; most of the survivors were sold in the public fairs, each for the price of ahorse ; and such as would not sell, were delivered to the Egyptians, to be insulted, trampled on, and put to death, just as the Egyptians pleased. Having reduced by his generals the Alans and Massagetas, Adrian went to Athens, where, as in many other cities, proofs of his splendour soon arose ; among them was an altar dedicated to himself as a divinity ! Why should not he, who had made so many gods, be a god him- self? After seventeen years' absence in the provinces, he returned to Rome, and adopted Commodus Verus, — for reasons, if history be tnie, which add infamy to his name. Verus died, and was made a 116 god. Titus Antoninus was next adopted, on condition that he would adopt Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus, the son of Commodus. Seized by the illness which was destined to end fatally — the result probably of his own intemperance — Adrian became ferocious, and many were the citizens who fell victims to his sus- jiicions. His sufferings were so great, that he called upon his domestics to kill him, but none, we are told, durst attempt it. Well for them they did not attempt it; could he not have killed himself, if he sincerely wished for a release ? He took an easier way — he drank himself to death. This emperor was a poet, a judge in painting, ai'chitecture, and music. Some of his pieces remain, but they have no great merit. One of them, his Adda-ess to the Departing Soul, is well known, as the fomidation of Pope's 'Vital Spark,' &c. which is still better known. Remember- ing only his cruelties, the senate proposed to abolish his decrees ; but this was re- sisted by Titus Antoninus : it would have annulled his own election. After all, divine honours were paid to his memory ; and the place of his sepidture was long admired : since the days of Justinian it has been used as a forti'ess, and known as the castle of St. Angelo. The succes- sors of Adrian knew how to make gods as well as he did. (Suetonius. Dio Cassius. Crevier's Roman Emperors. Gibbon.) ADRIAN. So highly did his con- temporaries think of the talents of this sophist, that we shoidd have regretted deeply the loss of his writings, had not three of his slighter pieces been pre- served to prove how little confidence is to be placed in such eulogists. Born at Tyre, he went, at the age of 18, to attend the school of Hcrodes, at Athens, and succeeded to his chair during the lifetime of his master, having previously opened a school of his own at Ephesus. He seems to have valued himself not only on speaking extemporaneously and with great fluency, but on the univer- sality of his acquirements — at least, if, according to Kayser, (Philostrat. Vit. Sophist.) he is the person ridiculed by Lucian in Demonact. § 14. The pro- mise he gave in early life of future ex- cellence was so great, that when Herodes Atticus heard an off-hand speech of his, M'hen Adrian was very young, he ob- served it was the fragment of a colossus ; by which he intended not only to praise the production, but to point out its abnipt character. On taking his seat at the head of the rhetorical school, he ADR commenced liis inaugm-al speccli by- saying — ' Letters have come once again from Phoenicia;' in allusion to the fact of Greece having obtained her language from the land of his birth. Like Hip- pias, he paid great attention to his per- sonal appearance, and was bedizened with precious stones; and went to his lectui-es in a chariot drawn by horses in gilt harness. During the time when he was the star of rhetoric at Athens, Marcus Aurelius arrived there to take part in the mysteries ; and he was so struck with the powers of the sophist as to invite him to Rome, where he loaded him with gifts and honours. There he passed the remainder of his days, and died at the advanced age of 82. Judging from the few fragments published by Leo Allatius, under the title of Excerpta Varia Graecorum Sophistannn, &c. (Rom. 1541,) it would seem that he took for his model Isocrates, whose perpetual antithesis gives the reader as much pain to peruse as it did the author himself to compose. They have been recently re- printed in Walchi i. Rhetor. Graec. i. 526. ADRIAN, a writer of the filth cen- tury, — whether a Latin or a Greek, is disputed. He wrote an Introd. to the Holy Scriptures, which obtained the praise of Photius : the Greek original is in the 9th vol. of the Critici Sacri. (Cave, Hist. Lit.) ADRIAN, a native of Africa, and a celebrated churchman of the seventh century. He was abbot of a monastery near Monte Cassino in the Neapolitan territory ; and on the death of Deus- dedit, bishop of Dover (archbishop of Canterbury), in 664, pope Vitalian sent for Adrian in order to persuade him to accept the vacant see. Adrian, thinking himself unworthy, refused the honoui-, and eventually Theodore was consecrated to that dignity, and Adrian agreed to accompany him. He is said by Bede to have been an excellent Latin and Greek scholar, and well skilled in every thing pertaining to ecclesiastical discipline, &c. (Bede, iv. 1, 2. See more in BoUandi Acta SS. Jan. i. 595. Inett's Origines.) ADRIAN I. (Pope, 772—795), will always be remembered for his corre- spondence with Charlemagne. That monarch protected him against the Lombards and the Greek emperor ; in return, Adrian declared him a Roman patrician, and gave him so much in- fluence in the eternal city, that he might be said to have succeeded to the rights of the Roman emperors. This pope was a good man; he was deeply regretted 117 ADR by the Romans, and by Charlemagne, whose verses on the occasion may be transcribed : — " Nomina junfjo simul titulis, elarissime! nostra: Adrianus.'Carolus,— rex ego, tuque pater. Guisque legas versus, devoto pectore supplex, • Amborum, mitis,' die, ' miserere Deus !' " ADRIAN II. (Pope, 8G7— 872), suc- ceeded Nicholas I. He did not seek the dignity ; twice he had refused it ; and nothing short of the universal cry could now induce him to accept it. His election furnishes a good illustration of the con- nexion between the empire and the priesthood. The ambassadors of Louis II. complained that they had not been in- vited to it: the reply was, that the reason was not any want of respect, but an apprehension lest the custom of waiting for the imperial envoys should become invariable, — a necessary con- dition. The people wished Adrian to be hnmecUatehj consecrated ; but this had not been usual, it had been the excep- tion to the rule : and the confirmation of the emperor was solicited before it took place. The period had not yet arrived when the mitre was to be wholly independent of the crown, still less when it was to assume the disposal of the crown. AVhen elected, Adrian had a wife; but as required by the canons, he had long separated from her; — he coidd not, in- deed, exercise the functions of priest until he had for ever promised to ab- stain " ab usu matrimonii." Though 76, he shewed great vigour of character. He condemned Photius, patriarch of Con- stantinople ; he held bold language to the emperor Basil ; he procured the de- position of Lambert, duke of Spoletto; and he took a decisive part in the qiiar- rels between the Carlovingian princes of his time. He evidently aspired to raise the altar above the throne. Hinc- mar of Rheims did not hesitate to tell him that he was stepping far beyond his proper sphere. In other respects Adrian was a good man ; he had great talents, great virtues. Some of his letters are stiU extant. (Baronius, Annales. Fleury, T-Ijof T* CCiGS I ADRIAN III. (Pope, 884—885), was at variance, like his predecessor Mari- nus, with the patriarch Photius, because the latter rejected the doctrine that the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father and the Son. ADRIAN IV. (Pope, 1154 — 1159), the only Englishman that ever ascended the throne of St. Peter, was of very humble extraction. His name was Nicholas Breakspear, and his native ADR ADR place was Langley, near St. Albans. Conformably with the custom of the times, his father had become a lay- brother of St. Albans ; and during his childhood he himself was employed in the menial offices of that celebrated esta- blishment. Wishing to receive _ the monastic habit, he applied to be admitted to his novitiate ; but as he had received little education, the abbot Richard told him to attend the school longer, mitil he were better qualified for admission. For this the abbot is censured by Pitts ; but the relation of Matthew Paris affords no ground for the censure. Adrian, however, left England in the hope that he should be more fortunate abroad. He traversed France, and entered the monastery of St. Rufus, in Provence, where he was received merely as a lay- brother. But he applied himself dili- gently to his studies ; and his progress was rapid, and he became a favomite of the monks, who admitted him into their community. In 1137, they elected him abbot. This election of a foreigner gave umbrage to some of the monks ; and they complained of him to pope Eugenius III. Such complaints were, and are, of frequent occm-rence in most religious orders. The abbot went to Rome to defend his own cause ; and he was honourably acquitted by the pope, who told the monks to return home, and elect another superior with whom they might be able, or rather with whom they might be willing, to live in peace. His preferment was now sure; in 1146 he was made cardinal bishop of Albano, and sent as papal legate into Denmark and Norway. In those regions, he la- boured with much success to extirpate the lingering traces of idolatry, and to settle the infant chiuch. In 1154, he was chosen successor to Anastasius, and he took the name of Adrian IV. — a name dear to the Italians. Robert, ab- bot of St. Albans, accompanied by some monks and three English bishops, arrived at Rome to congratidate him by order of Henry II. ; and they were the bearers of rich presents. Some of them the pope accepted ; the rest he refused ; nor could he avoid observing with a smile, that their present liberality formed a contrast with their former want of it when they had refused him the habit. However, his good feeling prevailed over his re- sentment ; and he exempted the monas- tery from episcopal jurisdiction, by placing it immediately under the holy see. To Henry, on a subsequent occa- 118 sion, he granted permission to conquer Ireland. Why Henry should apply for it, and passively at least acquiesce in the monstrous claim that all insular kingdoms belonged to St. Peter, might surprise us, if Ave v.'ere not aware how easily he could sacrifice his policy to his immediate interests. With equal vigour, Adrian supported the interests, or we shoidd rather say the pretensions, of the church against Frederic Barbarossa. With William, king of Sicily, he was still more energetic : he raised troops, marched against that monarch, and de- feated Mm ; but in his tm-n he was de- feated, besieged in Benevento, and forced to grant more favourable condi- tions than he wished. William, how- ever, submitted to an annual tribute. In his private life, Adrian was very re- spectable : he was frug-al, simple, a lover of truth, and a patron of merit. That he found no joy in his elevation, is evi- dent from his conversation with John of Salisbury. He almost wished that he had never left England. His great fault was his high notion of the papal prero- gatives. Some letters and sermons of this pontiff remain ; he \vrote also an account of his own legation into the north, and a treatise on the Miraculous Conception. (Baronius, Annales. Fleury, Histoire. Biog. Britan.) ADRIAN V. (Pope, 1276), a Ge- noese, succeeded to Innocent V., but reigned only one month. ADRIAN VI. (Pope, 1522—1523), a native of Utrecht, in 1459, was edu- cated at Louvain, the highest dignities of which he attained. As preceptor of Charles V. he could not fail to expect higher honours. By Fernando of Spain, to whom he was sent ambassador by Maximilian I., he was made bishop of Tortosa : after Fernando 's death, he be- came regent conjointly with cardinal Ximenes ; and in 1517 he was himself raised to that dignity. For the office of regent, he had few qualifications : he had little knowledge of the world, less of the state of parties, less still of the Spa- nish character ; yet, had he governed it at a more fortunate period, his defects would not have been perceived. He was always sincere, always Avell-mean- ing, always ready to do the best he could. The civil war in Spain, raised by the communeros, or advocates for municipal freedom, against the authority of the crown, gave him trouble enough : had not Charles associated other persons with him, the insuiTCction might have ADR ADR become too powerful to he crushed, even by the lord of many kingdoms. At length it was suppressed, and it was scarcely so before he received the news of his elevation to the pontifical throne, through the influence of Charles. It was unfortunate for him that he had to govern a people so fond of pomp as the Romans, and to succeed so splendid a sovereign as Leo X. They were no judges of his austere virtues, which they had not principle enough to admire. His frugality ; his parsimony even ; the re- formations which he attempted amongst the clergy, from the highest to the lowest rank ; his admission, through his nuncio, at the diet of Nuremberg, that the vices of the church had produced the heresy of Lvither ; his humility, his constant piety, rendered him obnoxious to the interested, to the worldly-minded, to nearly all the inhabitants of Italy. But the church was not long blessed with this admirable pontiiF: in about a year he paid the debt of nature, or he was poisoned. " To the liberator of his country" was written on the door-post of his physician, who perhaps deserved the compliment. Adrian wrote several works, chiefly phi- losophical. Before his elevation to the chair of St. Peter, he laid down the maxim that popes might err even in articles of faith : when pope, he re- printed the work, and did not expunge the maxim. (Robertson's Charles the Fifth. Dunham's Spain and Portugal, vol. v.) ADRIAN, the Carthusian, who lived at a monastery of his order near Ger- truydenberg, early in the fifteenth cen- tury, is the author of a moral work, "Liber deRemediis utriusque Fortunee," so rare as seldom to be seen. ADRIAN, cardinal and bishop of Wells, was a native of Cornetto, a small town in Tuscany. He studied at Rome, where he distinguished himself, and where his merit was rewarded. By Boniface VIII. he Avas sent as nuncio into Scotland ; but passing through Eng- land, the disturbed state of that kingdom prevented his proceeding to his destina- tion. At the recommendation of Morton, archbishop of Canterbury, he Avas ap- pointed the agent of our Henry VII. at Rome. As a reward for his services, he was presented successively with the bishoprics of Hereford and Wells. But he did not reside in his sees, and his duties, like his enthronement, were per- formed by proxy. By Alexander VI. he was invested with several dignities, and at length with the pui-ple. His riches 119 excited, we are told, the cupidity of Caesar Borgia, who caused poison to be administered to him ; but he recovered. Subsequently he was compelled to leave Rome, and was, it is said, degraded from the purple. Of his end we have no cer- tain account ; but the public opinion is, that he was slain by one of his servants who coveted his wealth. Adrian wrote two good works, — De Vera Philosophia, which is a religious ti"eatise, and De Ser- mone Latino, which is a history of that lan- guage. He also wrote some Latin poetry. ADRIAN, or ADRIANSEN, (C. 1521 — 1581,) a native of Dordrecht, entered the order of St. Francis, interfered in the political affairs of the Netherlands, always adhered to the successful party, and was always worthless. ADRIAN, the first bishop of St. An- drew's, in Scotland, killed by the Danes, A.D. 872. (Spottiswood.) ADRIAN I. Of this name we shall select three Italians only. 1. Marcello VmjUio, (14G1 — 1521,) professor and chancellor of the Florentine republic ; is chiefly known for a transla- tion of Dioscorides, with a Commentary. 2. Giovanni Batista, (1513 — 1579,) son of the preceding, first a soldier, next a professor of eloquence ; wrote a His- tory of his Times, which may be called a continuation of Guicciardini's, and wliich has received miich praise. He also composed the funeral oration of three princes — Cosmo I. Charles V. and Ferdinand I. 3. Marcello, (1533—1604,) son of the preceding, professor of belles lettres in the imiversity of Florence ; published the History of his Father, translated the Morals of Plutarch and another Avork from the Greek, and Avrote some Lectures on the Education of the Nobles of Florence. ADRIANO, (d. 1630,) of Cordova, a barefooted Carmelite who bad a great taste for painting. His Crucifixion remains. ADRIANSEN, (Alexander,) a Flemish painter, famous for representing fish ; b. about 1625. ADRICHOMIUS, (C. 1533—1585,) a native of Delft in Holland, became a Roman-catholic priest, and AA'rote two Avell knoAvn Avorks, — Vita Jesu Christi, and Theatrum Terrae Sanctae. In the same centiuy lived a Dutchman of this name, Cornelio Adricomia, whom Bayle has praised for his knoAvledge of the ancient languages, history, and theology. ADRY, (J.F. 1749— 1818,) a native of Burgundy, and a priest of the Oratory, became librarian of his order at Paris, A Dll yE G I which post he filled until the Revolution deprived him of this employment. Then commenced his privations, and he woidd probahly have died of want, had not pri- vate friendship found the way to relieve his necessities without hurting his feel- ings, lie is known both as an author and as the editor of republications, to which he affixed very good prefoces,- and which he frequently accompanied by notes. He wrote several treatises on biographical subjects, and two or three elementary ones. Some valuable biblio- graphical books also were left by him in MS. which it would be desirable to have published. See a catalogue of them in the Suppl. to Biog. Univ. ADSON, (Hermer,) a native of the Jm-a mountains, who flourished in the tenth centiu-y, was educated in the mo- nastery of Luxexiil. In that celebrated house he assumed the cowl, and became its thirty-sixth abbot, according to tlie catalogue of Dunod; yet since the founda- tion of the monastery by Columbanus, scarcely three centuries had elapsed ; and we can only account for this number by the probable conjecture that the monks elected to the abbacy were generally advanced in years. The school attached to this religious foundation enjoyed con- siderable celebrity ; and Adson was soli- cited by several bishops to place those of their dioceses under similar regula- tions. He died in 992. Of his writings, the most valuable were the lives of some saints, of which most are probably lost. That of St. Mansuetus, bishop of Toul, is in the Thesaurus Novus Anecdotorum of JMartene ; that of St. Walbert is in the collection of Mabillon ; and there is a Treatise on Antichrist, supposed to be his, in most editions of Alcuin and of Rabanus Maurus. A list of his works may be found in Cave, Hist. Lit. ADVENIER FONTENELLE, (H. A. 1773 — 1827,) a French engineer attached to the army, and subsequently examiner of accounts, wrote some entertaining pieces for the stage. ADVENTIUS, 'bishop of Metz, (855 — 875,) was a prelate who had much concern in the political and religious affairs of his time. The part, however, which he took in the divorce of Lothaire from Theutberga, and the marriage of that monarch witli Waldrad, do little honour to his memory. He was one of the churchmen who sacrificed conscience to the pleasure of a king. By pope Ni- cholas I. he was degraded, but at the instance of Charles the Bald, restored. 120 iEACIDES, son of Arymbas king of the Molossi, succeeded to the throne after the death of Alexander, brother-in-law of Philip king of Macedon, on whom the Molossians were dependent. Influenced by Olympias, the mother of Alexander the Great, his conduct gave offence to his subjects and allies, and he fell in battle against those v/ho laboured to prevent his retin-n to Epirus. jEDESIUS, of Cappadocia, an ascetic philosopher, who, preferring wisdom to riches, was expelled from the paternal roof; but his father at length consented to receive him, and even sanctioned the continuance of his studies. Having made great progress in them, he repaired to Syria, became the disciple of Jamblichus the Chalcidian, and obtained considerable renown. On the death of the master, he was forced to become head of that pagan school, — no enviable dignity, con- sidering the active persecution which at that very moment Constantine the Great was carrying on against all pagan philosophers. Removing to Pergamos, success still more splendid attended his instructions. Chrysanthus, Maximus of Ephesus, Eusebius, and the emperor Julian, were his disciples. iEGEATES, (John,) a Nestorian monk, probably of the fifth century. He wrote an ecclesiastical history, wliich is lost, except a small fragment. iEGIDIUS, a Benedictine monk, a na- tive of Athens, flourished in the eighth century. To him is sometimes ascribed an obscene medical poem. iEGIDIUS, a deacon and poet of Paris, who flourished in the thirteenth century. He \vrote a history of the first crusade to Jerusalem, which is in the collection of Duchesne. iEGIDIUS, (John,) a native of St. Albans, was educated at Paris, and was the first Englishman that joined the Do- minicans. He taught and lectured in the two schools of his order at Oxford. By Grossetete bishop of Lincoln, he was removed, and made assistant of that pre- late in the administration of his diocese. tEGIDIUS, (Peter,) of Antwerp, edited the Latin poems of Politian. Another iEgidius, (Gabriel,) who lived in the seventeenth century, ^\Tote two philosophical works. Many of this name might be enumerated, but they scarcely deserve to be rescued from oblivion. ^GIDIUS A COLUMN A. SeeCo- LONNA (Giles). iEGIDIUS CORDUBENSIS. See Giles of Cordova, MGl JEL¥ JEGIMVS, a Greek physician, anterior perhaps to Hippocrates. According to Galen, he was the first that reduced pid- sation to a science. JELF, (Samuel,) a learned Swedish theologian of the last century, pi'ofessor at Upsal. He wrote some good Latin poetry. ^LFRIC, (964—1051, also written Alfric or Elfric,) a famous ecclesiastic of the tenth and eleventh centuries, to whom ■we owe a large portion of the Anglo-Saxon literature that has come down to us. His history is involved in considerahle ob- scurity, but has within the last few years been much illustrated in a treatise, pub- lished without the author's name, luider the title of Antient History, English and French, exemplified in a regidar Dissec- tion of the Saxon Chronicle ; London, 1 830. Some further light has been thrown upon the subject by Mr. Soames in his Anglo-Saxon Church. He appears to have been born about the year 965, appa- rently not earlier than 964, but of his parents nothing whatever is known. His education was begun imder a clergyman of but meagre attainments, as we may learn from the Preface to his Translation of Genesis ; but he seems at a proper age to have been removed to Winchester, and to have finished his studies in the cele- brated school there established by I)ishop Ethelwold, then in his old age. Ethel- wold delighted in the work of instructing young persons who were willing to learn, and his kindness seems to have made a deep impression upon the mind of young Alfric, who ever after remembered him with the greatest tenderness and vene- ration. Ethelwold had been zealous in establishing the Benedictines in the place of the SaeciUars, and his pupil warmly espoused his principles ; he strongly advocated the monastic system, and entertained high prejudices against married clergy. Indeed he seems to have imagined that without the rule of St. Benedict, good ministerial qualifica- tions were altogether unattainable. As he appears to have been a man of sober mind, it is probable that his preference for the monastic party was not founded on mere prejudice, but on what he thought substantial reasons. Possibly their great services to literature may have influenced his judgment ; for however it may be the fashion of the present age to ridicide monkery and monks, it is quite certain that both for literature and the seminaries of literature, we and their contemporaries are deeply their debtors. His studies at Winchester he seems to have prosecuted 121 with diligence and success, as we find him occupying an honorary rank among the monks, though what rank is here de- nominated by the word " proepositus,"* it is perhaps impossible now to ascertain. The venerable Ethelwold had been ga- thered to his fathers in 984, according to the Saxon Chronicle, and was succeeded by St. Elphegus, by whom Alfric was selected to govern the abbey of Cernc, in Dorsetshire, lately founded by Ethehnar, earl of Cornwall. Thither then he went in the year (according to Wharton) 987. Here, beside his regular duties, he ini- dertook and completed a work of great general utility. The clergy were bound both by usage and law to give a sermon every Sunday; and this must have been a task to M'hich comparatively few, iu that unhappy period of English his- tory, were reasonably competent. lEA- fric accordingly selected and translated forty homilies from the works of St. Au- giistine, St. Jerome, Vcn. Bede, St. Gre- gory, Smaragdus, and Hajmio, which he submitted to Sigeric archbishop of Can- terbury, by whom they were approved, and their use authorized. These were followed l)y forty more, which were equally successful. It was probably dur- ing his residence at Cerne, that he was I'equested by his diocesan, Wulsinus, bishop of Sherborn, to compose a sum- maiy of useful information, by way of a circular to the clergy. This, like his Paschal Sermon, is particvdarly valuable, as containing a direct and strong testi- mony against the Tridentine dogma of transubstantiation. His words are trans- lated from Rabanus Maunis ; they arc at variance ^vith Rome, and precisely in unison with the doctrine of the Anglican Church. There is extant in the Bodleian an epistle to Wulstan II. archbishop of York, similar to that to Wulsinus (which latter has been frequently printed), containing an equally decisive contradiction to tlie Romish dogma. He also translated several parts of the Holy Scripture. The vener- able Ethelwold, before he died, had re- stored the abbey of Peterborough, then called Medehainpstead, and sometimes Burch, which had lain near a century in ruins, since its destruction by the sons of Ragnar Lodbrog. Hither was iElfric translated with the title of abbot in the year 1004-5. Here he seems to have composed his Latin Grammar in the Saxon language, and here he completed his Life of Ethelwold. The date of this • Whartcn considers the word to mean ■' abbot," but there r.cver was an abbot of Wincliester. MLF ^LF lattei- work is fixed by its being addressed to Kenulf, bishop of Winchester, who held the see but one year, and died in July 1006. He was iElfric's predecessor at Peterborough. It was here probably that he wrote his Glossary, and also pro- duced a body of monastic discipline, and other pieces. The learned energy of his earlier years has indeed rarely been siur- passed ; and though, like other Anglo- Saxons, he wrote but little quite original, yet, considering the time of his appear- ance, he has fully earned a foremost rank in the Hterature of England. Dm'ing his abode at Peterborough he seems to have been much endangered by a party of plundering Danes, but escaped safely in the escort of queen Emma, the wife of Ethelred, over into the dominions of Richard, duke of Normandy, a. d. 1013. Ethelred's sending his queen under the care of ^Ifric and Alfhun, bishop of London (some say Alfdun, bishop of Durham) into Normandy, was but a preparatory step to his going thither himself. How long JElMc remained on the continent we cannot accurately ascer- tain ; but it cannot have been very long, since in the year 1023 we find that his remarkable qualifications had, if one may judge from the language used, for some time attracted the attention of the shrewd and discerning Canute, under whom he was promoted to the archbishopric of York, and in 1026 went to Rome and received his pall at the hands of the sovereign pontiff John XVIII. on the 12th of November. With the arch- bishopric of York he probably held the bishopric of Worcester also, as had been done by the three preceding archbishops. Worcester catliedral had been con- verted into a Benedictine abbey, which York had not ; and these archbishops, being Benedictine monks, held in com- mendam a see which offered them a cathedral where they might reside in their character of abbot. He seems, however, to have resigned Worcester about 1034, in which see he was suc- ceeded by Britegus. The archbishopric of York he held a quarter of a century, and died at Southwell, in the year 1051. His remains were interred in his own abbey of Peterborough. His ashes ap- pear to have been once translated ; for dm-ing the atrocities of the rebellion, Cromwell quartered himself at Peter- borough in the summer of 1643, where he sacked and spoiled the church, level- ling the high altar, a beautifully curved structure, with the ground. In 1651 122 the munificence of a private individual undertook, not indeed to restore the altar to its former condition, but to level the steps with the pavement of the chou', and thus remove the appearance of violence. The removal of this brought to light two chests of about three feet long each, one of which contained the bones of Kinsinus, archbishop of York, and the other those of jElfric, as appeared by the inscriptions upon them. Their original coffins must, of course, have been larger ; on which account it is considered that they were translated ; and indeed this is clear, for Abbot John mentions that in his time they were enshrined. The shrines, accord- ing to Patrick (who wrote in 1686), still remain just northward of the high altar. His character was upright and honour- able in the highest degree, and his dili- gence and learning prodigious : in spite, however, of his vigorous understanding, he is said to have put fidl faith in the miraculous privileges of relics, and to have been a diligent collector of them. In addition to the works already men- tioned, he appears to be the author of a considerable portion of the Saxon Chro- nicle. His treatise on the Old and New Testament has been printed by L'Isle, as also the Paschal Homily, and a part of the Epistle to Wulsinus ; the whole of which last is given in Latin in the ninth volume of Cossart and Labbeus's General Councils. His translations from the Old Testament are published by Thwaites ; and the preface to the book of Genesis has been reprinted in Thorpe's Analecta. There are said to be a treatise on the Marriage of the Clergy, a translation of St. Gregory's Dialogues, several Lives of Saints, a Penitential, and many other works by him in the different MS. libra- ries of this kingdom. Singular as it may appear, the history of this great man is involved in much obscurity ; and, con- sidering the fame and voluminousness of ^Ifric, and that Osbern and Malmesbiuy lived but shortly after him, it seems dif- ficult to acquit them of a deliberate in- tention to suppress his memory, and bury his very name under a mass of confusion and uncertainty. The evidence of this is traced by the ingenious author of the Dissection of the Sax. Chron., but cannot be entered into in a work like the pre- sent ; suffice it here to say that both were adherents of Lanfranc, and the new Nor- man theology, and therefore bitterly op- posed to the catholic doctrine of the Eucharist, so powerfully maintained by iElfric. Those who desire to see how M L F ^LI his writings have been treated, are re- ferred both to the little book above cited, and especially to Mr. Soames's Bampton Lectures, p. 428 — 442, in which work some other of his homilies are printed. (See also Cave, Hist. Lit. ii. 108.) ^LFRIC. Another ecclesiastic, partly cotemporary with, frequently confounded with, the preceding. Like the great JEAiv'ic he seems to have been a disciple of Ethelwold, though not at Winchester. Ethelwold was then abbot of the newly- restored abbey of Abingdon ; and on his removal to the see of Wincliester in 963, jElfric succeeded him at Abmgdon. We meet with nothing else concerning him tiU the year 990, when he was pre- ferred to the bishopric of Wiltun, and thence, in 996, to the arcliiepiscopal see of Canterbury. In the succeeding year he proceeded to Rome to receive his pall from pope Gregory V. and died in the year 1005, and was biu'ied at his monas- tery of Abingdon. He diligently sup- ported the monks against the seculars. .iELFRIC, surnamed Bata. This per- son is mentioned by Hickes as a disciple of the great jElfric, and a very infei'ior man : but little is known of the particu- lars of his life ; he lias, however, pre- served to us a document which illustrates the Anglo-Saxon method of teaching. It is a colloquy in Latin between a master and his pupils, written originally by the great jElfric, for the purpose of teaching children Latin, and was afterwards con- siderably enlarged by Bata. It has been printed by Mr. Thorpe in his Analecta, and is accompanied by an interlinear Anglo - Saxon gloss, thus facilitating to the learner the acquisition of the Latin language by means of a Hamil- tonian version. It would seem, however, that jElfric Bata was no contemptible opponent to the new Romish theology of the Normans, for he is attacked by Os- berne with a foolish story, in which the gliost of St. Dunstan is represented as appearing, and stating, as the cause of the usual miracles at his tomb being sus- pended, that he had been absent oppos- ing jElfric Bata, who was endeavom-ing to disinherit the church of God. Os- bcrne's object in making this tale was evidently to brand indirectly the name of ^Ifric with heresy, which he dared not do openly. jElfric Bata calls himself a monk, though the abbey to wiiich he belonged, as well as the dates of his birth and death, are a matter of uncer- tainty. Mr. Sharon Turner makes jElfric Bata the preceptor, and not the disciple 123 of .(Elfric of York. (Ang. Sax. torn. iii. p. 424.) Bata, however, himself states the contrary ; and, moreover, had the case been as Mr. Turner states, he could not have lived long enough to move the hatred of Osberne. jELIAN. History has recorded four individuals of tliis name, 1. jEUanus Meccius, a physician, who lived in the time of Hadi'ian, He was the first to employ medicinal preparations of poisonous animals to act as an antidote for the plague, as we learn from Galen (T. xiii. p. 963, ed. Charter,) who there speaks in high terms of his oldest master. 2. jnUanus Claudius, who wrote a work on Military Tactics, which he dedi- cated to Hadrian. It was held in such esteem in former times, that the emperor Leo transcribed whole passages out of it, when giving instructions for the military department of the government. It was first edited by Robertelli (Ven. 1515), then by Meursius (Lugd. Bat. 1613), with the notes of Sixtus Arcerius. It was translated into Italian by Lilio Carani, (Fiorenze, 1552;) into French, by Louis de Machault, at the end of his Polybius, (Par. 1615;) and by Bouchard de Bussy, (Par. 1757;) and into English, by Bing- ham, (Lond. 1616,) and by Visct. Dillon, (Lend. 1814.) To use the language of Bingham in liis dedication to prince Mau- rice of Nassau, " In a little volume is so expressed the whole art, that nothing is more short, nothing more Unked toge- ther, in coherence of precepts, and yet distinguished with such variety, that all the motions requisite to be used in a battle are fully expressed therein." Pot- ter, in his Antiquities of Greece, has made a considei'able use of Bingham's book, which is full of learned and valu- able matter, as remarked by Visct. Dillon ; who has appended to his version of the Greek, a translation of the Memorial Topographique et Militaire redige au Depot Genei-al de la Guerre. The cata- logue, with which it concludes, lays down the most complete course of reathng for those desirous of studying the art of war scientifically. The same jElian wrote, he says himself, a work on Naval Tactics ; but which is no longer in existence. 3. This is the author of the History of Animals, the Various History, and the Treatise on Providence. Of these Avorks, the first has, with the exception of a few lacume, come down 'to us in its oi-iginal form. It commences with a Prologue and finishes with an Epilogue, and runs through seventeen books. The M L I ^LT Var. Hist, contains only fourteen ; and even of these, according to Kulni, merely some extracts have been preserved, as shown by the compiler's usual 'Oti, found at the commencement of many chapters. It is quoted by Steph. Byz. (in Xeppovr](Tos), and by Lactantius (Divin. Instit. i.) It seems to have been little else than a common-place book similar to the Apophtliegms of Plutarch, and has been called the first of the -ana ; and though the author is frequently con- tent to retail in his own language what he found in other writers, the work is not without its use, as it commmiicates some facts not mentioned elsewhere. Of the treatise, Ilept Ylpovoias, or Ylepi Qeicov Evepyeicov, nearly the whole has been handed down m the numerous frag- ments preserved by Suidas, (Herodot. vii. 11. n. 10.) Its object was to prove, what the Epicureans denied, the ex- istence of a Providence. The account given by Philostratus (Vit. Soph.) of ./Elian is, that although he was by birth a Roman, he wrote with all the purity of an Athenian ; and though he was hailed by the honourable name of sophist, he bore liis faculties meekly ; and that, conscious of his unfitness to appear in public as a declaimer, he applied liim- self to compositions in the closet, where he exhibited the ease of Nicostratus and the strength of Dio. Of these composi- tions, one seems to have been an invec- tive against a recently deceased tyrant, — according to Pei'izonius, Elagabalus ; and when ^lian had read it with great spirit, and at the pitch of his voice, to the elder Philostratus, the latter observed, "that a child could trample on a dead tyrant, but a man shoidd cut up a living one." We learn, moreover, from the younger Phi- lostratus, that iElian had been the pupil of Pausanias ; was a great admirer of Herodes Atticus ; and that so far from venturing upon a voyage, he had never put his foot on board a vessel, and knew notb.ing of the sea but from hearsay. According to Suidas, however, ^Elian was born at Prseneste ; while the author of the Var. Hist. (xii. 25 ; xiv. 45,) calls himself a Roman ; and in Hist. Anim. (xi. 40,) testifies that he had been to Alexandria, and saw there the five-footed bidl, sacred to Serapis. To solve the difficulty, Perizonius conceives that Phi- lostratus has written with his usual care- lessness ; while Jacobs (Prcef.iElian. H.A. p. 37) fancies that the work on Na- tural History was written at a period of iElian's life later than that to which Phi- 124 lostratus alludes. Valckenaer (Phalarid. Epist. Pnef.) supposes the two works to be written by different persons, despite the resemblance which Perizonius, with whom Jacobs agrees, has noticed in their style and sentiments. This opinion, says Wyttenbach, (Biblioth. Crit. iii. 4. 12. p. 16,) Valckenaer would have repu- diated on second thoughts. Bernhardy, on the other hand, conceives (Syntax, p. 37, n. 61,) that it is the only correct view of the matter. But how much soever the learned may differ on this point, all have been ready to adopt the notion of Perizonius, that the iElian to whom Philostratus alludes did not live under Hadrian, to whom the writer on Tactics dedicated his work, but imder Alexander Severus. This, says Perizonius, is evi- dent from considering that Philostratus takes the sophists in their chronological order, from the time of Hadrian to that of Alexander Sevenis ; and as ^Elian is preceded by Philiscus and followed by Heliodorus and Aspasius, the last of whom was a fellow-disciple of Pausanias, the Greek traveller, who is known to have lived in the time of Severus, the period of JElian is fixed at once. Kayser, how- ever, asserts that Perizonius is completely mistaken ; that the Pausanias alluded to is not the traveller, but the sophist of Caesarea, a pupil of Herodes Atticus ; and that the words of Suidas, em tcov fxfra Adpiuvov y(pov(iiv refer to the sophist Adrian, and not the emperor of that name. But in that case the Greek would have been tTrt rav fiera tov ABpiavov Xpovcov — •to distinguish the individual from the emperor, whose name is always used in such a formida without the arti- cle ; and were the fact other\vise, yet as the editor of Philostratus has not de- stroyed the argument drawn from the chronological order in which the lives are arranged, it is not likely that he will make many converts to his opinion. The editions of the Var. Hist, are — by Kuhn,' Argentor. 1685; by Perizonius, Lugd. Bat. 1701, and by Gronovius, Lugd. Bat. 1731, 4to, which contains all that is found in the other two, and something to boot ; while those of the Natur. Animal, are by Gronovius, Lond. 1744, re- printed at Basle, 1750; by Coray, in his IIpo8poiiosBilS\io6T]K. 'EXXrjviK. Par.; and by Jacobs, Jena, 1822, which is in reality an improved reprint of Schneid- er's, Lips. 1784, and is particularly valu- able for the collations of several MSS. and the imedited notes of Reiske. 4. The last jElian was a general in the -SL I ^NE time of Valens, as we learn from a frag- ment of Eunapius, preserved by Suidas (in AiXiavos and AvearTjKoys). He was bom at Syedi-a, a town of Isauria ; v/as of great bodily strength, and of such de- cision as to make action follow close upon council ; nor did he suffer the rough- ness of the soldier to be enervated by the cultivated education of the citizen. To the preceding must be added the unknown author of the Letters published by Aldus, Ven. 1499, 4to. These are said by Anthon (Lempriere) to be on rural affairs ; but they are in fact merely ima- ginary letters from persons living in the countrj^, and similar to those of Alci- phro and Aristeenetus. They are evi- dently a cento from Greek comedy, and have been applied by Bergler for the illusti-ation of Aristophanes, oftener than once. The 18th Letter, especially, was probably taken entirely from the Tfcopyoi of Menander. Jacobs attributes them to the author of the Var. Hist, and Hist. Anim. ^LIUS SEXTUS POETUS CATUS, a celebrated jurisconsult, was consul A. u. c. 556, at the conclusion of the second Punic war. He had previously served the ofRce of edile with consider- able reputation. jELRED. See Ethelred. ^LST, or AALST, (Evert Van, 1602 — 1658,) a Dutch painter, a native of Delft. He was famous for his paintings of game, fish, vases, &c. jELST, (WilHam Van, 1620—1679,) nephew of the preceding, also a native of Delft, and a painter in the same line of art, but of greater repute. In Am- sterdam, where he lived in the latter part of his life, he could hardly satisfy the demand for his paintings. (Bryan's Diet.) jEMILIA, (Juliana, 1637—1706,) countess of Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt, a Gennan poetess. She was the daughter of Count Barby, and married the Count of Scliw.-Rudolstadt in 1665. She wrote many h3'mns, which she was too modest to acknowledge in her lifetime. About 400 (some say 600) of her compositions appeared in The Spiritual Bridal Attire of the Friend of the Lamb ; Rudolstadt, 1714 (Geistlicher Brautschmuck der Freundin des Lammes) ; and The Daily Morning and Evening Sacrifice ; Rudol- stadt, 1699. There is a dispute as to the authorship of the pleasing hymn be- ginning " Wer weiss wie nahe mir mein ende " (Who knows how near my end may be), whether it is hers or Dr. Pfeff- erkom's. (Wolff, Cyclopadie.) Chev. Bunsen (Versuch eines Allgemeinen 125 Gesang-und-Gebet Buch, p. 887) v.'ho assigns it to her, says it was written on the sudden death of the Duke of Sach- sen-eisenach. He has inserted it, with fom- more of her hymns, in his volume. Her poetry is simple, and the sentiments pious and good, but sometimes deficient in spirit. (Wolfl", Bunsen.) jEMILIANUS. See Emilianus. ^MILIUS. See Emilius. EMILIA GENS. See Lepidus— ScAURus — Paullus. EMILIUS, (Antony, 1589 — 1660,) professor of history at Dordi-echt, who succeeded Vossius, is known as a com- mentator on the Annals of Tacitus. Another writer of this name, a kins- man of Luther, wrote Latin verses, and even translated the Gospels into heroic metre — Evangelica Heroico Carmine red- dita ; which has been often reprinted. ^NEiE, (Henry, 174,3—1812,) a na- tive of Frisia, and a philosophei-, who wrote little, but whose name will be re- membered in Holland. ^NEAS GAZ^US. Of this Chris- tian philosopher, who lived, as remarked by Bellarmine, (De Scriptor. Ecclesiast. p. 129,) towards the end of the fifth cen- tury, in the time of the emperor Zeno, there is only a single dialogue remaining, under the title of Theophrastus, on the im- mortality of the soul. The original Greek was first printed by Gesner, together with Canon. Apostol. et Veter. Concilior. ; Ignatii Epistol. ; Athenagoras Apolog. ; Demetrii Cydon. de Morte Contem- nenda ; Hermise Irrisi. ; and Agapeti Diacon. Capit. Admonit ; (Tiguri, 1559 ;) from whence it was reprinted in the Bibliotheca Patrum. Its latest editor was Caspar Barthius, Eques ; who pub- lished it with the Dialogue of Zacharias, bishop of Mitylene, De Opiflcio Mundi ; Lips. 1655. Clavier (Biographic Univer- selle) wished that some scholar Avoidd give a new edition of a treatise, wiitten in rather a good style, and containing not uninteresting matter, especially as there is an excellent MS. of it in the Royal library at Paris. Whoever under- takes the work, we may add, should compare carefully the Latin version of Ambrosius Camaldulensis, printed at Venice in 1513 ; as it was evidently made from a more complete MS. than the one from which Gesner printed the original Greek. Of this fact, Barthius was not ignorant ; who, in p. 59, might have elicited from the Latin of Ambrose, — " Enimvero Atticus ille priscus, Platonis imprimis studiosus amator," the Greek of yE N E iERT Gazaeus, 6 8e TraXaios eneivos Attikos, 6 Tov TiKarcovos epacnrjs, — where the Vulgate has^o be ivoKvs kul Attikos ; — although it is true, as remarked by Bar- thius, that the philosopher Atticus, who is supposed to he H erodes Atticus, could scarcely he called " the old" by an author who lived only foui* centuries after him. It is to be hoped, therefore, that the MS. to which Clavier alludes will oiFer to Boissonade, (who, as stated in his edition of Theophylacti Simocattte Epistolae, in- tends to publish iEneas Gazseus and Psellus,) a better reading than the Vulgate iToXvs, our TTuKaios, and the 7Tpor]Kos which is found, says Barthius, elsewhere. Of the value of the Paris MS. some spe- cimens are given by Boissonade, in his Anecdota. The Dialogue was translated into French, as stated by Verdier, (Bibl. Gall. p. IG,) and appeared in German at Frankfort, 1671. To the same author are attributed some of the Epistolaa Grreca- nicEe, published by Aldus at Rome, 1499 j and which, says Fabricius, (Bibl. Gr. ii. 10,) were imjustly considered spurious by Barthius, (Adversar. iii. 20.) ^NEAS SYLVIUS. See Pius II. ^NEAS TACTICUS. Of the period when this writer lived, nothing is known for certain. Hoffman (Lexicon Univer- sale) says he flourished in the time of Aristotle. Casaubon, who first published the original Greek at the end of his Polybius, (Paris, 1609,) thinks it not improbable that he is the ^neas of Stymphale, mentioned by Xenophon. (H. Gr. vii. 3. 1.) His work, to which allusion is made by Polybius, (x. p. 615. A.) was abridged, says Suidas, by Cineas the Thessalian, for the use of Pyn-hus, king of Epirus ; and it is probably the abridgment only which is now extant. The latest edition of it was published by Conrad Orelli, under the title of jEneas Tactici Commentarius, sive Supplemen- tum Polybiauffi editionis Schweigliseu- seranse; Lips. 1818. It forms likewise an Appendix to the Polybius by Grono- vius, Amstel. 1670; and by Ernesti, Lips. 1763. To the arguments of Casau- bon, with whom Schneider agrees in Xenophon, (K. A. ix. 7. 13,) it may be added, that the story of the manner by which a panic in an army was stopped, (as detailed in § 27,) is the identical one told by Xenophon, (K. A. ii. 2. 20,) to whom however no reference is made by jEneas, who would assuredly have quoted his author, had he lived in the time of Aristotle ; and a similar remark is ap- plicable to his allusion to the events 126 which took place at Platsea, where, with- out any reference to Thucydides, the story is told as if it were well known and of recent occurrence. ./ENESIDEMES, a phUosopher of Crete, and contemporary of Cicero. He taught at Alexandria, and according to Diogenes Laertius, wrote eight books of sceptical philosophy, of which a frag- ment only remains in Photius. He was the restorer of the Pyrrhonists, who had then fallen into disrepute. ^PINUS, (John, 1499—1553,) a fellow-labourer of Luther in the great work of the Reformation. In England he became a friar of St. Francis ; and on his return to Germany, he pursued his theological studies under Luther, at Wit- temberg. The opinions of that reformer he soon embraced, and was anxious to introduce them into his native province, the march of Brandenburg ; but in that region he had no success : he was even imprisoned by his countrymen. Yet, having obtained his freedom, he preach- ed, first at Stralsund, next at Hambiu'g, with a reputation little inferior to that of Calvin at Geneva. More fanatical than Melancthon, or even Luther, he opposed most of the overtures of con- ciliation made by Charles V. He as- sailed, however, the Anabaptists. His works are controversial, and chiefly directed against the Roman catholics. A philosopher of this name (1724 — 1802,) a native of Rostock, studied elec- tricity and magnetism with more success than any man of his time. His Tenta- men Theorifje Electricitatis et Magnetismi is said to exhibit a profound knowledge of principles established by successive experiments. His Reflections on the Distribution of Heat over the Earth's Surface, are mentioned with equal ho- nour ; and so indeed are many of his contributions to the philosophical journals of the Continent. AERIUS, founder of the heresy which bears his name, floiu'ished in the fourth century. The fundamental point of his discipline was, that bishops are not supe- rior to priests, — that the New Testament makes no distinction between them. In this he was wrong ; the apostolic fathers, especially St. Ignatius, could have taught him better. Another of his notions, that we need not pray for the dead, is more deserving of praise. In the time of St. Augustine, the sect was numerous. (See Mosheim, vol. i.) iERTS, (Richard, 1482—1577,) son of a poor fisherman of Wyck in North ^RT JESC Holland. He lost his leg in youth ; and showing a talent for painting, he was educated as an artist. He painted much at Haerlem and Antwerp. (Bryan's Diet.) iERTSEN, (Peter, 1519—1573,) a Dutch painter, a pupil of Alhert Claessen. His great work is the altar-piece of the church of Our Lady at Amsterdam, re- presenting the Death of the Virgin, and also the Nativity, and Adoration of the Magi. M. Coxie, the famous Mechlin painter, declined to work at Amsterdam, saying, that while Peter ^rtsen was there, they had no need of him. (Bryan's Diet.) _ ^SCHINES. Of this name eight in- dividuals are mentioned by Diogenes Laertius, ii. 64. 1. The Socratic philosopher. 2. The author of The Science of Rhe- toric. 3. The orator, and rival of Demos- thenes. 4. A pupil of Isocrates, and by birth an Arcadian. 5. The Rhetoro-Mastix of Mitylene. 6. The academic philosopher of Naples, and the pupil of Melanthius of Rhodes. 8. The sculptor. Of these it is probable that the second and fifth were the same person, and tliat a portion of The Science of Rhetoric was devoted to the flagellation of the rheto- ricians, and in a style more caustic than the irony and ridicule which Plato and Lucian adopted towards the sophists and philosophers of their day. To the pre- ceding list Menage adds six others : — 1. The sonof Nothon, who is described by Herodotus (vi. 100) as the leading man of Eretraea. 2. The son of Sellus, ridicided by Aristophanes in 0pp. 823, as boasting of his wealth although really poor. 3. The physician of Athens, men- tioned by Pliny, H. N. xxviii. 4. 4. Tlie Elean, whose two victories at the Olympic games are recorded by lau- sanias, vi. 14. p. 488. 5. The physician of Chius, by whose skill Eunapius, in Proseres. p. 76, ed. Boissonod. says, he was rescued from death. 6. The historian quoted by Eusebius. To the foregoing list Fabricius(Bibl. Gr. ii. 24. p. 691,) has added three more : — 1. The contemporary of Synesius, mentioned in Epist. 1. 3. 2. The physician of Lampros, whom Plutarch speaks of in Aristid. 3. The Eleusinian, whom Apolionius, 127 in his life of the orator, identifies with the author of The Science of Rhetoric ; and wlio is supposed by some persons to be the same as the Milesian, whom Cicero, in Bnit. ii. 95, describes as re- markable not only for his flowery style, but for his polished wit. Amongst the whole number, howe ver, only two have been able to obtain any place in history ; these are, the pupil of Socrates and the antagonist of Demos- thenes. ^sc/t/nes the Philosopher was the son of Charinvis, the sausage-seller, or, as Photius says, (in Biblioth. cod. 61,) of Lysanias. At an early age he attached himself to Socrates, to whom when he presented himself he said, as we learn from Diog. Laert. ii. 34, "Money I have none ; but wliat I have I will give — myself." "Know you not, then," said Socrates, " you are giving me a thing of the greatest value?" This compli- ment, so delicate, and so completely in unison with another remark of So- crates, who said that " iEschines alone knew how to do him honoiu-," has been rendered almost ridicidous by the laboured overlaying of Seneca, de Bene- fic. i. 8. After the death of Socrates he was compelled by poverty to emigrate to Sicily ; where, says Plutarch (ii. p. 67), he was at first neglected by Dionysius, until, at the intercession of Plato, he was received at the court of Syracuse. There, according to Lucian, (in Parasit. § 32,) he soon unlearned the precepts of the phi- losopher, and, adopting the practice of the parasite, forgot entirely the advice of Socrates, who told him that " a poor man should always borrow from himself, by diminishing the cost of his food." After his return to Athens, he seems to have opened a school, where the auditors paid for the privilege of attending, and to have employedhimself in writing speeches for persons concerned in law-suits ; and in which, by taking Gorgias for his model, he gained some reputation, and especially by his defence of the ftither of Phseax. The dialogues attributed to him are the following : — 1 . Alcibiades ; 2. As- pasia; 3. Axiochus ; 4. Callias; 5. Mil- tiades ; 6. Rhinon ; 7. Telauges — toge- ther with those which, from the abrupt manner of their commencement, were called " the headless," under the titles of Draco, Erasistratus, Eryxias, Plijedo, Polyaenus, and The Scythians. Of these the first has been attributed to Antis- thenes, as stated by Diogenes Laertius. To the second, fourth, and seventh, JESC /£S C allusion is made by Athengeus, in v. p. 220, and who tliere details a portion of their suhject-niatter. The fiftli is quoted by Lucian, in Parasit. § 32. The seventh is mentioned by M. Antonin. vii. Gfi, and by Pscudo-Dcmetr. Phaler. §. 310; the latter of whom observes, that it is hard to say whether it was written in a vein of real admiration or of con- cealed banter. It would seem that of the whole nvunber, not a single one has been preserved ; although a fragment of the Aspasia is found in Cicero de Invent. i. 31. There are two, indeed, under the titles of Axiochus and Eryxias amongst the Pseudo-Platonic Dialogues ; yet the former has been attributed to Xenocrates by Ficinus, and abjudicated by other scholars, on the authority of Pollux, vii. 135, who says thatyEschines used the word aXcKTpvoTpocfioi in his Axiochus, which is not to be found in the still-existing dialogue of that name. Athenocus too, in V. p. 220, testifies that iEschines in his Axiochus ran down Alcibiades ; a remark that cannot apply to the Axiochus we now have, where no mention is made of Alcibiades at all. On the other hand, the Pseudo-Platonic Sisyphus, which is one of " the headless," has been attributed to iEschines ; and if the dialogue be really his, one would suspect that the title 2kv6ikol given by Suidas is a cor- ruption of 2i(Tv(f)os ; and this with the greater probability, as it contains in § 3 an allusion to an /Esopic fable, preserved in its original Choliambic form in the Vatican MS. (De Fur. No. 351), and which both Lucretius, in i. 968, and Cicero, N. D. i. 20, seem to have had in their eye. Thus, too, we can account, not onl}' for the suspicions of Aristippus, who, when he heard ^schines read one of his dialogues, cried out, " Where did you get those ideas, j-ou thief?" but likewise for the tradition that states that ./Eschines obtained from the widow of Socrates the unpublished MSS. of his master, Avhich he passed off for his own productions : and though, says Diogen. Laert. (ii. 61) they wanted the nerve of a genuine Socratic dialogue, (by which he probably meant those of Plato,) yet, according to Aristides, (Orat. Platon. i. p. 367, ed. Cant.) they were a more faithful representation of the real senti- ments of Socrates ; " for jEschines," says he, " appears to have put down what he actually heard, or something vciy like it, while Plato has put into the mouth of his master much of what it is confessed he never uttered." With regard to the 128 style of ^schines, it is described by Ilcnnogenes (Uepi iSeco^, ii. 2, p. 894, Walch.) as far superior to Xenophon's in ease and simplieit}^, as the latter ex- ceeded that of Plato ; and hence it was considered by Phrynichus the grammarian one of the models of Attic propriety, as we learn from Photius, cod. 61. An edi- tion of the Pseud-^schinean dialogues, with numerous notes, was given by Fis- schcr. Lips. 1786, and reprinted in the Variorum Plato, Lond. 1826, while a solitary epistle, falsely ascribed to ./Es- chines, is to be found in Orelli's edition of the Socraticorum Epistolce, Lips. 1815. uEschincs the Orator was the son of Tromes ; who, says Demosthenes, (Ilfpi 2Te0aj/. § 129,) afterwards called himself Atrometus, — to conceal, it would seem, the fact of his being originally a slave ; for tlie Greek Tpoprjs would thus answer to the Latin Dromio. His mother's name was Glaucis, or Glaucothea, in allusion probably to her grey eyes ; while her nick-name was Empusa (E/n7roucra), that being the appellation given to the chil- dren's ?;w^rtioo at Athens ; and which was the more applicable to her, as she is said to have kidnapped young pei-sons in her dishonourable trade of a procm-ess, or in the situation she held as the attendant on the ablutions, which those about to be initiated in the mysteries were re- quired to luidergo. Lucian, in Somn. calls her a Tvp.Travi a disciple of Luther, but entertained doc- trines i-especting works which led Luther to enter into controversy with him ; and Agricola recanted his notions, which were charged, justly or unjustly, as the origin of Antinomianism. The common account given in Mosheim, Dr. Hey, &c. is, that when Luther in 1538 was urging very strongly the doctrine of justification by faith alone, Agricola founded upon this doctrine some unwarrantable no- tions. Mosheim has stated that his doc- trines upon the whole amounted to this : That the Law, by which he understood the Ten Commandments, was meant for Jews, and may be laid aside by Chris- tians, for whom it is sufficient to explain and enforce what the New Testament teaches as to the means of grace and salvation, and the obligations of repent- ance and virtue, — a doctrine almost identical with that of the Whately school. The disputes originated by this doctrine apparently caused him to quit Wittenberg, and go to Berlin as first preacher there, a post offered to him in 1540 by the elector of Brandenbm-g. The history of this recantation, and the unhandsome conduct of Agricola towards Luther relative to it, will be found in Walchii Introductio in Libros Symboli- cos, p. 809 — 816, with full references to Seckendorf and many otlier writers. Dr. Hey supposes that Luther was the first to apply the name of Antinomian to him ; but be this as it may, at the end of this year he recanted. His name follows that of Melancthon in the signatures to the Smalcald articles, (1537,) which Melancthon signed, but with a protest on one point. The name of Agi'icola is not subscribed to the additional Smalcald article on the primacy of the Pope, and the agreement of the subscribers with the Augsburgh Confession and the Apo- logy. That of Stephen Agricola is found in both. (See Augusti Libri Symbolici, pp. 259, 274, &c.) We must remark, however, that he had at first signed the Augsburgh Confession in 1530. (Melcli. Adam, p. 409.) In 1548, he was one of the three divines who di'ew up the Inte- rim. (Sec Pflug and Sidonius.) The extreme dissatisfaction justly given by the Interim to the Evangelical party is too well known to be narrated here (see Sleidan, Comment, xx. xxi.), and Agi'icola gained no credit by his share in its composition. In his later years he was chiefly occupied in the controversy on the Adiaphora, but apparently M AG R A G R without much advantage. Upon the whole, his character as a theologian is open to chai'ges of inconsistency, and a want of straightforward dealing ; but in our estimation of him we must remember that he lived in times of almost unparal- leled difficulty and excitement. His theological works are, principally, his Commentationes in Lucam, and a Re- futation of Muncer's Explanation of the 19th Psalm. He is known also under another point of view — as a writer on the German language, in which respect he is highly praised by Wolff, (Cyclopadie, &c.) as having much merit, considering the time in which he lived. His principal work in this character is A Collection of 750 German Proverbs, at first printed in three parts separately. The title of the first, as first printed, was — Dre hundert Gemener Sprekwbrde, der wy Diidschen uns gebruken, unde doch nicht wetten wohar se komen, dorch Dr. Johann Agricolam von Islewe. Magdeburg, 1526, 8vo. The same book was pub- lished in Hochdeutsch at Eisleben, 1528. The most correct edition of the whole Sieben hundert und funffzig Deutscher Spriichwcirter, &c. is that of Wittenberg, 1592. (Melchior Adam; Sleidan; Wal- chius, &c. ; and Hey's Lectures, vol. iii. pp. 36 — 41, where some remarks on his theological opinions will be found.) AGRIPPA, (Camillus,) a distinguished architect of Milan, of the sixteenth cen- tury. He published several works, called, 1. Trattato di Scientia d'Arme con un Dialogo de Filosofia ; Rome, 1553. 2. Dialogo sopra la Generazione de Venti ; Rome, 1584, 4to. 3. Nuove Invenzioni sopra il Modo di Navigare ; Rome, 1595, 4to. 4 Trattato di trasportar la Guglia in su la Piazza di San Pietro ; Rome, 1583, 4to. In the last he gave an ac- count of his method of removing a vast obelisk to St. Peter's square, in which he was employed by pope Gregory XIII. All his works are very rare. AGRIPPA A NETTESHEIM, (Henry Cornelius, 1486—1535.) A Ger- man alchemist, physician, and philoso- pher. This eccentric man was born at Cologne, Sept. 14, 1486. (Brucker, Hist. Philos. iv. 387.) His family was noble, and had long been attached to the Aus- trian princes. After a suitable education, he was sent at an early age to the camp of Maximilian I., in which he served seven years. If his own boasting asser- tions may be credited, he was at first employed as secretary to that prince, but as his sojourn in Spain (more than 162 seven years afterwards) was in the year 1509, he could not have been more than 13 years of age at the period of his joining Maximilian. He was, according to his own account also, highly distin- guished both in his diplomatic and mili- tary capacity, and obtained the honour of knighthood. In 1507 he returned to Cologne, and pursuing his studies with great ardour, he received the degree of doctor in the faculties of law and medi- cine. He remained in hopes of some high employment, but the truth seems to be, that he had deluded the princes, to whom he had access, with hopes of the philosopher's stone, and he fovmd that their promises of preferment were as little to be trusted for realizing a fortune as his alchemy. Indeed, he had so noto- I'iously deceived them that he fled to escape their resentment, and from this time his life assumed a wandering cha- racter. (See Brucker, iv. 389.) He re- treated to Spain, then to Avignon, where he set up as an alchemist, and being soon compelled to quit that country, he took refuge at Dole, in Burgundy, where he was made professor of Hebrew. He was a follower of the school of Reuchlin in philosophy, and read lectures on his Treatise de Verbo Mirifico, which were attended by the most learned civilians and theologians, and obtained him a great reputation. But his abusive dis- position rendered him satirical on the monks, in these lectures, and John Cati- linet, the provincial of the Franciscans, in Burgundy, endeavoured to convict him of heresy. He was now obliged to leave Dole ; he went to London, published an answer to Catilinet, and after a few months returned to Cologne, where he remained till 1511, when, it is said (but the authority is doubtful) he was invited by cardinal Santa-Croce to attend him to the coimcil of Pisa. We find him next lecturing on Hermes Trismegistus, at Pavia, which he soon left, and was em- ployed for a time at Metz, in the capa- city of syndic and orator of that city, but was obliged to leave it under suspi- cion of heresy, a.d. 1520. He had, in fact, ventured to doubt the tradition which assigns three husbands to St. Ann, and he had opposed the torturing of a woman, accused by the inquisitors of sorcery. Again upon the wing, in 1520 — 1523 he visited Geneva, Friburg in Switzerland, and Lyons, (1524,) in which place he settled, with the promise of a pension, as physician to Louisa of Savoy, the mother of Francis I. Having, how- A G R A G R ever, declined to become her astrologer also, declaring that he would not satisfy a vain and unlawful curiosity, he fell into disgrace, and his pension was with- drawn. It must be remarked, that at the very time he thus condemned judi- cial astrology before the queen, he had cast the nativity of her enemy, the Con- stable Bourbon, and predicted the most complete success to his arms. His con- dition was now desperate, and yet such was his reputation for learning, that crowned heads and nobles petitioned for his presence in their respective countries. Henry VHI. of England, and Margaret of Austria, the governess of the Nether- lands, were among the number ; and in 1528, he joined the court of the latter at Antwerp, and became historiographer of the empire. Here he suffered a severe domestic calamity in the loss of his wife, who died in giving birth to a son. His abuse of the monks brought him again into trouble, and he would soon have lost the favour of the princess also, but death removed her, and he pronounced her funeral oration. His book, De Vanitate Scientiarvnn, (whether published a little before at Cologne, or now at Antwerp,*) gave great offence ; and his persecutors, the monks, spread i-umours against his orthodoxy, and rendered him odious and his life miserable : indeed, on the publi- cation of his Treatise de Occulta Philo- sophia, he was imprisoned for a year at Bruxelles. On his release he returned to Lyons, where he was imprisoned again, for what he had formerly written against the queen-mother. On the termination of this imprisonment he went to Bonn, and soon after to Lyons or Grenoble, and died at the latter place in 1.535. Thus ended his eventful life. He was one of those inconsistent and eccentric characters which defy delineation. Rest- less, ambitious, enthusiastic, and credu- lous ; a dupe himself, and a deceiver of others ; his career was one unbroken series of disappointments and broils. Like Ishmael, his hand was against every man, and every man's hand against him. That his learning and talents were of no ordinary kind, is unquestionable ; and it is equally evident they were miserably abused, although the age in which he lived may form some excuse for this misapplication of them. As a philoso- • Chalmers, in his Life, possibly following Brucker, iv. 396, who calls the edition of 15S0, the first, says it was published in 1530 ; but in his enu- meration of the works of Agrippa, he gives the editions mentioned in the Biog. Univ. of which the tecond is dated 1527. 163 pher, he is classed by Bnicker among those opponents of the Aristotelian sys- tem, who formed a kind of philosophy out of the Neo-Platonic doctrines, chris- tianized and mixed with views deduced from an imperfect acquaintance with the Jewish Cabbala, a follower of Reuchlin (otherwise called Capnio), Picus of Mi- randola, &c. In his book De Occulta Phi- losophia, he speaks of magic as the complement of philosophy, the key of the secrets of nature, and represents it under three forms — natiu^al, celestial, and religious or ceremonial, agreeably to the three old divisions of the coi-poreal, celes- tial, and intellectual world. "He enume- rates, with a show of scientific classifica- tion, purely superficial, the hidden powers which the Creator has assigned to the different objects of the creation, through the. agency of the spirits of the world." (Johnson's Tenneman, p. 270.) His book. On the Vanity of Human Know- ledge, is a clever production, but a painful one to read. It is the work of an acute mind ransacking all its stores to prove all mankind wicked and foolish, and to show that there is no certainty and no utility in human knowledge. But its downright abuse is, at least, less hateful than the sneer of Voltaire, and the author always professes a thorough regard for Christianity, and its peroration is a noble in\dtation to go to the Bible, the Spirit of God, and to Jesus Christ, as the source of all knowledge. In fact, the book is like himself, inconsistent ; at one moment mischievous, sophistical, and venomous ; and the next, eloquent, just, and wise. The very master, whose sys- tem he commented upon in another work, he rejects with scorn here as a sophist and deceiver, viz. Raymund Lulli. (See § ix. of Agrippa de Vanitate). It was a work of high reputation in its day, and will always remain a monument of his great abilities, and leave us to regret that they were not united with more steadiness of mind and conduct, which might have rendered them a blessing to their owner and to the world at large. Agrippa has been called a protestant; but although he spoke favourably sometimes of Luther, it does not appear that he left the Romish communion, and his employment by Charles V. argues against it. He was twice married ; some authors say three times, and that he divorced his third wife. His works are : — 1 . De Incertitudine et Vanitate Scientiarum ; without date, 8vo; Cologne, 1527, 12mo ; Paris, 1531, M2 A G R A G R 8vo, &c. The editions subsequent to 1539, are mutilated. It has been trans- lated into most European languages. 2. De Occulta Philosophia, Libri Tres. (N.B. The fourth book found in his works is not his.) Antwerp and Paris, 1531, &c. Translated into French by Le Vasseur ; (the Hague, 1727, 2 vols. 8vo.) 3. De Nobilitate ct Prsecellentia Sexus Foeminei ; Antwerp, 1529, 8vo ; written to please Margaret of Austria. It is annexed to modern editions of the De Vanitate. 4. Commentaria in Artem brevem Raymundi Lulli ; Cologne, 1533. 5. Orationes de- cem ; de duplici Coronatione Caroli V. apud Bononiam, &c. ; Cologne, 1533, 8vo. The only good edition of Agrippa's works, is that of Leyden, (apud Beringos, with- out date,) in Italic lettei"s. The coun- terfeit editions are in Roman type. (Agrippa's works, Brucker, Tenneman, Biog. Univ. &:c.) AGRIPPA LANATUS, (Menenius,) consul of Rome in the year of the city 251. His colleague, Tuburtus, having been beaten by the Sabines, Agrippa, at the head of the Roman youth, marched to their succour, and obtained a complete vic- tory over the enemy. He was the first to receive the honour of a public triumph. AGRIPPA, (Marcus Vipsanius, b. c. 63 — 12,) son of Lucius Agrippa, accord- ing to the medals, was of a family so ob- scure or reduced, that but for the reputa- tion of the son the name of his father would have been unknown. The origin and impoi't of the surname "Agrippa" are explained, though mth some discre- pancy, by Pliny, Solinus, and Aulus Gellius. It signified in the language of obstetric art a false presentation at birth. In the mythical portion of Roman his- tory it occurs as the surname of an Alban king, and in the later periods is afiixed to the gentile names Furius, Menenius, Posthumus, &c. Probably it was seldom a personal designation, although Pliny the elder conceives it to have been so in the instance of Marcus Vipsanius. He was born in the same year with Octa- vianus Ca?sar, b. c. 63 ; since he died in his 51st year, in b. c. 12. Agrippa was the companion, perhaps the fellow-stu- dent of Octavianus, at Apollonia in Illy- ria, where the youthful Cresar pursued his studies under the care of Apollodorus and Theagenes, while awaiting with the advanced guard of his uncle's army the Dacian and Parthian campaign. When the news of the dictator's violent death readied Apollonia, Salvidienus, another of the personal friends of Octavianus, 164 and M. Agrippa, urged him to accept the offer of the legions to accompany him to Italy, and to support him in an immediate assumption of the name and authority of Csesar. The proposal, how- ever, suited neither the cautions temper of Octavianus, nor the fears of hia mother Atia, and her husband Marcius Philippus. Agrippa, probably, attended his friend to Rome ; since we next find him as the accuser of C. Cassius, in the general impeachment of those who had conspired against the late dictator as traitors and parricides. We have no account of Agrippa during the first period of the civil wars that followed the expulsion of Brutus and his associates from Rome and Italy. But on the breaking out of the Perusine war, Agrippa, by occupying Sutrium [Sutri] on the Cassian way, prevented Lucius Antonius, the triumvir's brother, and his lieutenants Ventidius and Asinius Pollio, from cutting off Salvidienus, who had been recalled by Octavianus from his march to Spain. Lucius, after a fruitless attempt to effect a junction Avith Venti- dius, and harassed in his tiu-n by Salvi- dienus, retired to Perusia, which was speedily invested by three divisions of the Ccesarians. Agrippa seems to have commanded the blockade, while Caesar and Salvidienus prevented any diversion or relief on the part of the Antonians. Perusia surrendered in b.c. 40 : and the next service Agrippa rendered to Octa- vianus was that of persuading two le- gions, of the division of Munatius Plancus, which had been intercepted at Cameria, to desert. In the same year, or at the beginning of 39, M. Agrippa went to the relief of Thurii and Con- sentia in Bruttii, then besieged and their lands laid waste by Sextus Pompeius. On his way thither from Etraria he sum- moned the veterans, who were settled in the neighbourhood of the great roads, or in the colonial towns, to serve against Sextus. But the remembrance of M. Antony, always the favourite of the sol- diers, was stronger than the arguments of Agrippa, or the authority of Cassar, and many of the veterans deserted when it was reported among them that Mark Antony approved the war. In 38 b.c. Agrippa was engaged in reducing Trans- alpine Gaid to obedience, and in driving back the German tribes across the Rhine. For having carried the Roman arms be- yond that river into the forests and morasses of Germany, where hitherto Julius Ccesar alone had penetrated before A G R R hlni, Agrippa received, in 37, from Oc- tiivianus, together with the consulship, tlie triumphal oniaments, the substitute for the old imperatorial procession. But Caesar's affairs at this period did not admit of any unnecessary delay or exult- ation, and Agrippa was recalled from Gaid to supermtend the equipment and discipline of the naval armament, then preparing on the coast of Campania against Sextus Pompems, who was master of Sicily and the Mediterranean, and swept the western coast of Italy with a formidable fleet of Liburnian galleys. Agrippa executed this important com- mission with eminent skill and expedi- tion. Italy, in proportion to its long line of coast, enjoys naturally few good harbours, and Octavianus had already suffered severe losses in his fleet from the west and African winds blowing upon an open beach. The lake Avenius was converted into a secure and spacious roadstead, by opening a communication with the sea and the basin of lake Lucri- nus. The Portus Jidius, as it was after- wards called in honour of Augustus, served for exercising the galleys ; and to this practice, and to another — according to an anecdote preserved by Servius, of instructing the rowers to work against wind and tide, and the soldiers to dis- regard the dashing violence of the waves, — Caesar is said to have been indebted for his victory over Pompeius, and, subse- quently, for his final triiunph over An- tony at Actium. The armament being ready, Octavius sailed to Vibo (Bivona) in Bruttii : Agrippa having the command of the fleet, and Messala and Statilius Taurus of the land-forces. Caesar left Agrippa at Strongyle, one of the jEolian (Lipari) islands, while he attacked Tauromenium with his whole army. — Agrippa crossed over to Hiera ; and off the bay of Mylee engaged a superior force of the Pom- peians under Demochares. Pompey's vessels were lighter, and more expert in their evolutions : but the galleys of Agrippa were better fitted for close com- bat, and the valoiur of his soldiers was steadier. After an obstinate conflict, in which the galley of Demochares was split by that of Agrippa, Pompeius gave the signal for retreat, having lost thirty of his own vessels, and destroyed or taken only five of the enemies'. Agrippa remained at sea great part of the night, in readiness to renew the engagement if Pompey's ships had quitted the shallows among which they had taken refuge. A 165 few days after he surprised Tyndaris, but, though admitted by the townspeople, was repulsed by the garrison. He was enabled, however, to place garrisons in several places on the Sicilian coast, to relieve Cornificius and his division from a situation of great danger, and, in a second attempt, to make himself master of Tyndaris and its ample magazines. A last and decisive battle was fought by Agrippa off Naulochus ; Pompey's entire fleet was taken or destroyed ; and him- self in a few days fled with only seven- teen galleys to Antony in Asia. For these services Agrippa was pre- sented by Caesar with a rostral, or naval crown — an unprecedented distinction, imless Pliny is correct in ^stating that, afler the completion of the war against the Cilician pirates, Cneius Pompey con- ferred that honom* on M. Varro. Agi-ippa (b. c. 35) accompanied Caesar as his lieutenant, to the Illyrian war, and attacked and subdued successively, the Japyds, the Dalmatians, and the Panno- nians. In 33 b.c. he was, at his own request [«kcbi'], aedile, after having been consul in 37. His year of office was dis- tinguished by the splendour and utility of his public works, and the munificence of his largess and exhibitions to the people. The Appian, Marcian, and Aniensian aqueducts, that, during the long civil distiirbances, had f.illcn into ruin, he restored, adorning their margins with statues and columns, and supplying many districts of the city, and many stations on the gi-eat roads, with reservoirs of fresh and sparkling water. At this period, probably, for the date is not accurately known, he brought the Aqua Tepula, and Aqua Virgo, from the lands of LucuUus, near Tuscidum, to Rome. The river- like sewers that cany into the Tiber the waters drained off from the Forimi, the Velabrum, the Valley of the Circus, and the Subura, the imperishable struc- tures of Tarquinius, and the kingly age of Rome, were filled in several places and choked up with rubbish. Agrippa forced seven toiTents of water into the different entries of these cloacae, cleared them from all obstructions, and sailed imder their lofty vaidts of hewn sti ue imtil he emerged upon the stream of the Tiber. A less useful, but not a less popular mode of employing his ample revenues, was entertaining, for fifty-nine successive days, the citizens of Rome, with exhibitions of all kinds, from the pantomime to the combat of gladiators ; diu-ing Avhich time provisions were gra- A G R A GR tuitoiisly distiibuted to the spectators. The people were indulged with the novel amusement of a scramble ; and from the roof of the theatre a species of lottery- tickets was thrown down among the au- dience, that entitled the fortunate ohtainer to a prize of money, or plate, hand- some furniture, or clothing. A hun- dred and seventy baths, open to all classes, and maintained at his cost dur- ing the year of his sedileship, attested Agrippa's zeal for the health and recrea- tion of his countrymen. And such was his passion for embellishing Rome, and making her the metropolis of the arts, as well as of the world, that in a speech, which PHny calls magnificent and worthy the " greatest of the citizens," he recom- mended that all private collections of pic- tures and statues should be rescued from the obscurity of country-houses and pro- vincial towns, and displayed in the tem- ples and porticos of the capital. The year 32 was taken up with pre- parations for the final struggle between Antony and Caesar. And in the following year the well-appointed fleet and army that crossed the Ionian sea from Brimdu- sium to the Ambracian gulf, bespoke the cai"e and experience of Agrippa. Before the decisive battle of Actium he had stormed Methone, twice repidsed the An- tonians, and occupied Leucas, Patrae, and the western port of Corinth. He was the principal commander at Actium, having M. Larius on his right, and An'untius on his left wing, while Caesar, in a light gal- ley, went from ship to ship, wherever his presence was most required. The event of the day, as is well known, was owing to the superior skill and discipline of Caesar's fleet, which was imequal in weight and number of vessels to that of Antony. Agrippa was presented by Caesar with a blue standard. After the svirrender of Antony's army had completed the victory in the Ambra- cian Bay, Agrippa was despatched to Italy to superintend the pay and grants of land to the veterans, and, if possible, to keep order among those turbulent par- tisans of Caesar. Maecenas, Caesar's pre- fect in Italy, being only of equestrian rank, and without military reputation, it was feared he might be unequal to the task of satisfying them. He and Agrippa were now in such high esteem with Caesar, that the letters he addressed to the senate were first submitted to them, and on the most virgent business he cor- responded with them in a peculiar cipher, and furnished each of them with a dupli- 166 cate of his own seal-ring. Agrippa's name does not occvir in the history of the Alexandrian war, b. c. 30. In 28 and 27 he was the colleague of Caesar in his sixth and seventh consulships. In Agrippa's second consulship a census of the Roman citizens was held : in his third, Octavianus Caesar received the title of Augustus, and Tiberius Nero, afterwards the Caesar, the manly gown. The following years were occupied with the campaign against the Asturians and Cantabrians in Spain, and with the subjugation of the mountain tribes of the Graian and Pennine Alps. But, in these, Agrippa was only par- tially engaged, since, in this interval, in the absence of Augustus, he presided at the marriage of Marcellus and Julia, and restored, or added to, the public edifices of Rome. Soon after this marriage, Agrippa, either dissatisfied with the honours heaped upon Marcellus, or at some change in the behaviour of Augustus, retired to Myti- lene, in Lesbos. He did not return to Rome until after August, b. c. 23, and maiTied the widow of Marcellus in 21, Maecenas having hinted to Augustus that having made Agrippa so great, not to make him greater might be dangerous. Cains Caesar was born in b. c. 20, and Lucius in 17, and both, after the birth of the latter, were adopted by their grand- father into the family of Caesar and the succession of the empire. In 18 b.c. when the power of Augustus was renewed for five years longer, Agrippa was ap- pointed to the inviolable, but anomalous dignity of tribune. In the following year he celebrated with Augustus, for the fifth time, the secular games ; and soon after the birth and adoption of Lucius Caesar, he went with Julia into Syria. Agrippa reached Asia at the approach of winter. Herod the Great, king of Judea, met him soon after he landed, and besought him to become his guest, who had so long, and on so many occa- sions, been his friend. Agrippa's progress through the dominions of Herod was a succession of festivals, in which the Roman splendour and predilections of the tyrant were contrasted with the pecu- liar ceremonies of the nation. Agrippa sacrificed a hecatomb at Jerusalem, and entertained the citizens at public tables. His visit was shortened by the approach of winter, and the necessity of returning to Ionia while the voyage was yet prac- ticable. In the following spring Agrippa sailed up the Bosphorus to Sinope in Pontus, where Herod rejoined him. They returned overland, through Cappadocia A G R AGR and Upper Phrygia, to Ephesus. During his sojourn in Ionia, Agrippa, at the re- quest of Herod, or persuaded by the elo- quence of Nicolaus of Damascus, con- firmed the Jews, settled in the province of Asia, in the exercise of their civil and religious immunities. In her journey through the Troad, Julia was endangered by a sudden overflow of the Scamander, and the citizens of Ilium, a town that claimed a kindred origin with Rome, oifended Agrippa by neglecting to come to her assistance. He imposed a heavy fine upon them ; but Nicolaus, who was present, had sufficient influence with Herod to induce him to become their advocate with Agrippa. He affected to be moved with the plea set up by the rhetorician of their consanguinity to Rome, and remitted the penalty. Agrippa returned from Asia in 13 b.c. after, according to Josephus, an adminis- tration of ten years. But, in this com- putation, he includes his retirement in Lesbos, B. c. 23. His tribunitian dignity was renewed in the following year (12) for a second period of five years ; and he was sent into Pannonia upon some symp- toms of disaffection on the frontier. The revolt was put down ; but his march had been in the winter season, and Agrippa, throughout his active and restless life, had been afflicted with the gout. Upon his return he fell sick in Campania, at the time of the Quinquatria or Pana- thenaic festival [March 19 — 23], and died before Augustus, who was exhibit- ing a combat of gladiators in honour of Caius and Lucius Caesar, could arrive. He was in his fifty -first year at his death. Agrippa was thrice married : — 1 . To Caecilia Attica, daughter of Titus Pom- ponius Atticus, by whom he had Agrip- pina Vipsania, married first to Tiberius Nero CfEsar, and secondly to Asinius Gal- lus Saloninus. 2. To Marcella, daughter of Octavia, by C. Marcellus, consul in 50, whom her uncle Augustus caused him to put away, that he might marry — 3. Julia, by whom he had Caius and Lucius Caesar, and Posthumus Agrippa, born after his father's decease, and two daughters, Julia and Agrippina. Agrippa appears on the medals Avith the rostral crown ; and on the reverse a laureated head of Augustus ; or, with the mural and rostral crown, and a similar reverse. (See Akerman's Roman Coins, vol. i. p. 141.) In the reign of Augustus the Cam- pus Martins was surrounded by many 167 porticos and sumptuous buildings, the structures, at his own cost, of M. Agrippa. Foremost was the celebrated Pantheon, built after the battle of Actium, and, as its name implies, dedicated to all the gods. Agrippa intended to have placed Augustus in the circle of divinities, and to have named the edifice after him ; but as he declined such a distinction, Julius Csesar was placed within the temple, and Augustus and Agrippa in the portal. It was decorated with cariatides, the work of Diogenes the Athenian. Contiguous to the Pantheon were the baths and gar- dens, which Agrippa, at his death, be- queathed to the people. The portico of Neptune, adorned with the story of the Argonauts — that of Octavia — the Septa Agrippiana, a sort of enclosm-e or colon- nade, like our bazaars — the Diribitorium, in which largesses were distributed to the soldiers, and the Portico of Pola, were the principal of " many excellent struc- tures that Agrippa gave to the people." Agrippa is celebrated by Horace, lib. i. od. vi. 5, mentioned in several passages, and, perhaps, noticed for a peculiarity in his dress, Sat. i. 2, v. 26. But he did not enter, like Mesaffa and PoUio, into the literary circles of the Augustan age. He publislied, however, a Statistical Survey of the empire, which had been projected by J alius Caesar. It was the official chart of the empire, and re-edited by Marcus Aurelius and Alexander Severus. (See ^thici Prsef. Cosmograph. Mannert In- trod. sect. i. p. 3. Wesseling, Prasf. ad Antonin. Itinerar.) AGRIPPA, (Marcus Jidius, b.c 12— A.D. 14,) son of the preceding by his wife Julia, and surnamed Posthumus, having been born subsequent to his father's death, inhei'ited none of the great qualities of liis father. He was adopted by Augustus at the same time with Tiberius, a.d. 4, but was subsequently disgraced — according to some writers, on account of his scandalous life, and the extreme vulgarity of his man- ners—but if we may believe Tacitus, owing to the artifices of Livia to promote the elevation of her son Tiberius. One of the first acts of that tyrant on assuming the imperial power, was the murder of the young Agrippa, even before the death of Augustus was publicly announced. Ti- berius had even the audacity to state that it was done by order of the djring emperor, — an attempt to blacken the fame of a benefactor whose clemency formed his sole glory, which met with the credit due to it. AGRIPPA; (Herod,) king of Judaea, A GR A G R soil of Aristobulus and Berenice, daughter of Herod the Great, was brouglit np in the court of Augustus with Drusus, son of Tiberius. Attaching himself to the party of Caligula, he was thrown into prison, where he continued till the death of Tiberius. Caligula, on becoming em- peror, not only set him at liberty, but presented him with a chain of gold of the weight of the irons he had worn, with the title of king, and the addition of two te- trarchies. One year afterwards, Agrippa set out to visit his kingdom, proceeding by Alexandria, which he entered with so much pomp as to excite the ridicule of the inhabitants, who insulted him by a mock procession, in which a mendicant played the part of a Jewish king. But Agrippa was soon established in his throne, and received many marks of the favour of Caligula. He was, how- ever, thrown into much difficulty by the attempt of the emperor to force the Jews to worship his image ; and from this dif- ficulty he was only relieved by the death of Caligula. Agrippa was then employed to negotiate between Claudius and the senate ; and, according to Josephus, prevailed upon the former to accept the empire. The new emperor not only confirmed him in his power, but added to his kingdoms of Judaea and Samaria the extent of dominion possessed by Herod the Great. Agrippa took up his residence in Judaea, and governed his subjects with mildness, although he intro- duced the manners and customs of the Romans, especially the gladiatorial exhi- bitions, to the great scandal of the Jews. To please his Jewish subjects he per- secuted the Christians ; and to this prince are owing the martyrdom of St. James, the brother of St. John, and the imprisonment of St. Peter. At Ce- sarea he held a brilliant court, and cele- brated Roman games in honour of Claudius ; made an oration to the depu- ties of Tyre and Sidon, who had attended to solicit his favour ; but when the para- sites cried out that his voice was that of a god and not of a man, he appeared sen- sibly affected ; nearly at the same time he was seized with violent pains, and after suffering prolonged agonies, died in the year 44, at the age of 54, after a reign of seven years. (Biog. Univ.) AGRIPPA, (Herod,) son of the pre- ceding, born at Rome after the Roman conquest of Judaea, was brought up by his uncle Herod, king of Chalcis, and was by him appointed to the superintend- once of the temple, and afterwards to 168 succeed him in his kingdom, to the ex- clusion of Aristobidus, son of the de- ceased. Having heard the noble defence of Paul before Festus, he became almost a convert to the christian faith, and gave marked offence to the Jews. In an attempt to suppress a revolt of the people, he was fiercely attacked and driven out of Jerusalem. He fled to the Roman governor Cestius, whom he assisted in subduing the refractory citi- zens. Upon the arrival of Vespasian, he joined him with a considerable reinforce- ment, and during the siege of Jerusalem rendered the greatest services to Titus. After its downfall he accompanied his sister Berenice, with whom he was sus- pected of holding too familiar an inter- course, to Rome, where he lived to the advanced age of 70, dying in the year of our Lord 90. With him the race and title of the Herodian kings became ex- tinct. (Biog. Univ.) AGRIPPA, an astronomer, who flou- rished towards the close of the first cen- tury of the Christian era. He became celebrated for one of his astronomical observations upon the moon, which he made the 4th year of the 217th Olympiad (the year of our Saviour 92), when that planet appeared in conjimction with the Pleiades. (See the Almagestus of Pto- lemy, lib. vii. c. 3, p. 176, of the edition of Basle, 1538.) AGRIPPINA I. Julia and Agrip- pina, the daughters of M. Vipsanius Agrippa and Julia, were man'ied the for- mer to L. Paulus, son of Paulus ^milius Lepidus, censor with Munatius Plancus, B.C. 22 ; by whom she had M. jEmilius Lepidus, put to death by Caligula, whose sister Drusilla he manned; and Emilia Lepida, betrothed to Claudius Csesar, but married to Appius Junius Silanus. Agrippina married Caesar Germanicus (see Germanicus), by whom she had nine children : two died in infancy, an- other in boyhood, — a child of such grace and beauty that Livia placed a statue of him as Cupid in the temple of the Capi- toline Venus ; and Augustus kept a simi- lar one in his chamber, whi'^h he always saluted on entering. Their other chil- dren were Nero and Drusus, put to death by Tiberius ; Cains, afterwards the em • peror Caligula ; Agrippina, the mother of Nero by Domitius Ahenobarbus, and afterwards the wife of Claudius Caesar, her uncle ; Drusilla (see Caligula) ; and Livilla (or Julia) married to M. Vinicius, and put to deatli by Claudius at the in- stigation of Messalina. A G R A G R The hovisohold of Augustus was simple and even parsimonious : his own dress was, for the most part, the work of Livia, his daughter, and his grandchildren ; and if the two Julias disgraced the les- sons and examples of their early years, the virtues of the first Agrippina illus- trated and enforced them. Suetonius has preserved part of a letter from Au- gustus to her, commending her talents and disposition, and impressing upon her the necessity of purity and conciseness in writing and conversation. P'or the campaigns of Germanicus be- yond the Rhine, see Gekmanicus. He was consul in a.d. 12; and in that, or in the following year, returned to the army. Agrippina was with him when the news of the death of Augustus reached the legions on the lower Rhine. When the mutiny broke out at Ubiorum Ara, pro- bably near Cologne, Germanicus dis- missed his wife and infant son Caligula to a place of safety. They were, how- ever, detained by the soldiers, wbo were struck with sbame and contrition at be- holding the wife of their general, the grand-daughter of Augustus, the mother of so many children, of equal beauty and virtue, driven fi-om the camp with her infant son, to seek refuge from their vio- lence among the enemies of Rome. In the following year, a.d. 15, when a de- tachment under A. Csecina had pene- trated into the territory of the Cherusci, to revenge the death and collect the re- mains of Vanis and his legions, a nimour was spread in the camp, on the Gallic side of the river, that the Romans had again been surrounded and cut off. In the panic that ensued, the soldiers would have broken down the bridge over the Rhine, had not Agrippina, during the interval of absence and uncertainty, acted with a decision and spirit worthy of the daughter of Agrippa. When Cse- cina and his division returned, she awaited them, as they defiled across the river, at the head of the bridge, distinguishing with praises and thanks the bravest of the le- gionaries, and relieving, in person, the sick and wounded. Such behaviour alarmed the jealousy of Tiberius : Agrippina, he said, had qvielled a sedition that neither the influence of the proper generals nor the authority of the emperor coidd allay. Some disturbances in the east afforded a decent pretext for removing Germanicus from the command of the German to that of the Syrian army. For the death of Germanicus at Antioch, a.d. 19, and the secret instructions to Piso and Plancina, 169 see Germanicus. In his last moments he commended to the Roman people the grand-daughter of Augustus and her six children. Agi'ippina, impatient of every thing that delayed her hopes of revenge, though worn with sickness and grief, embarked for Rome with her children and the ashes of Germanicus. Although her voyage was in the winter season, she proceeded at once up the Ionian Sea to Corcyra, and having remained in that island to recover her strength, crossed over to Brundusivim. As soon as her approach was known, the harbour, the coast, the walls and house-tops of the city, and even the neighbouring hills, were covered with an immense mul- titude of silent and anxious spectators. Veterans who had served vmder Ger- manicus, his personal friends, strangers from the nearest towns, and some who thought only of paying court to Ccesar, flocked to the place of landing. Her journey to Rome was a funeral proces- sion. The remains of Germanicus were carried on the shoulders of tribunes and centurions ; and when they passed the colonial towns, the people came out in mourning habits, and the wealthier in- habitants burnt fragrant gums and costly gai-ments by the wayside. Drusus and his brother Claiidius, with the children of Germanicus who had been left behind, the consuls, the senate, and the greater part of the citizens, met the procession at Terracina, and accompanied it to Rome. For the events of the day on which the ashes of Germanicus were de- posited in the mausoleum of Augiistus, we must refer to Germanicus. But nothing in tbe circumstances that fol- lowed the death of his adopted son touched Tiberius so nearly as the popu- lar feeling towards Agrippina. The as- sembled multitude had called her the sole remaining honour of her country, the last representative of her ancient race ; and offered up prayers and vows for ber life and safety, and the welfare of her children. The life of Agrippina was, henceforward, a series of insults and neglect. Outwardly, and for a time, Tiberius affected to put the childi-en of Germanicus on an equality with his own son Drvisus. In a.d. 20, Nero, the eldest, was introduced to the senate, and mar- ried to Julia, the daughter of Drusus ; but, in the public estimation, the cere- mony was profaned by the beti-othment of the son of Claudius to the daughter of the low-born Sejanus. In a.d. 23, Drusus, AG R AG R the second son, received the manly gown, and the same immunities and privileges which had been granted to the elder bro- ther were renewed in his favour. On the death of his son Drusus, Tiberius com- mended Nero and his brother to the senate, as the props of Livia's declining age, and the sole remaining hopes of the state. But the favour with which all classes at Rome regarded the sons of Germani- cus, and their presumptive succession to the empire, awakened the fears of Tibe- rius and the jealousy of Sejanus. The latter could not rid himself of the nume- rous family of Agrippina with the same ease with which he had removed Drusus ; and in Agrippina he found no second Livia. But the violence of her temper, her pride of birth and consciousness of virtue, and her recollections of the place she had held in the esteem of Augustus, were turned against her. She was vulner- able in her friends and childi-en. Claudia Pidcra, her cousin, was accused by Do- mitius Afer of adultery, and of conspiring by magical practices against the life of Caesar, and condemned. The reclama- tions of Agrippina drew from Tiberius the sarcastic rejoinder, conveyed in a Greek verse, that " Because she reigned not, therefore she was wronged." Caius Silius, and Titius Sabinus, and Sosia the wife of Silius, were adjudged to death or exde, for frequenting the house, or shar- ing the counsels of Agrippina. Her doors were beset by spies and informers ; her words, even her looks and her silence, noted in journals ; and the ancient hatred of Livia to the family of Caesar stimu- lated to fresh activity. At the imperial table, Agrippina refused some fruit offered her by the emperor. He affected to consider it as an insinuation that there was a design to poison her, and invited her no more : whereas, says Suetonius, it was a device of his own that she should so refuse, and thereby give him a handle against her ; he having, by one of his creatures, previously warned her of eat- ing any thing presented by the emperor. The popularity of Nero and Drusus, in whose features the Romans fancied they saw the living image of Germanicus, hastened their ruin ; and when, in the consulship of Cethegus and Visellius Varro, the pontifices and the other col- leges of priests included their names in the form of supplication for the life and welfare of Caesar, Tiberius sternly de- manded of them whether they had done so at the entreaties or the threats of Agrippina. 170 Their destrviction was resolved upon. Nero, his wife and brother having been persuaded by Sejanus to watch, report, and pervert his words and his actions, his complaints and his silence, was ba- nished to Pontia, an island on the La- tian coast, and di-iven probably to self- destruction. Drusus, similarly betrayed by his wife iEmilia Lepida, after being carried about in chains and a close litter by Tiberius during his journeys in Cam- pania, was starved in an obscure chamber of the imperial palace. The remains of both were dispersed, and Agrippina de- nied the consolation of collecting their ashes. Herself, accused of adultery, of wishing to move the commiseration of the people by fleeing to the statues of Augustus, of attempting the loyalty of the soldiers by reviving the memory of Ger- manicus, was banished to Pandataria, the place of her mother's exile. Her high spirit never forsook her. While strug- gling with the soldiers sent to arrest her, and heaping maledictions on Tiberius, one of her eyes was struck out by a cen- turion. She attempted to put an end to her miserable existence by abstaining from food; but it was forced upon her by the orders of Tiberius, who dreaded the hatred of the people. She persisted, however, and left an unblemished repu- tation, and an earnest feeling of compas- sion, in an age when the utterance of any worthy sentiment was a political crime, and pm'ity or rectitude of life was treason. AGRIPPINA II. daughter of Ger- manicus and Agrippina I. She married, at the end of a. d. 28, Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus, of a noble and ancient house, nearly allied to the Caesars. His character seems to have been an equal composition of cruelty and fraud; and he was so well aware of his own vices, and the disposition of Agrippina, that, when congratiUated upon the birth of a son (Nero), he is said to have replied, " Nothing but what was hateful and per- nicious to mankind could ever come from Agrippina and himself." Domitius died about four years after the birth of Nero (i.e. A.D. 37) ; and Galba, afterwards em- peror, was solicited by Agrippina, even while his wife Lepida was living, with so much importunity to marry her, that she brought on herself rebuke, and even chastisement, from Lepida's mother. In common with her sisters Julia and Dru- silla, she submitted to an incestuous in- tercourse with her brother Caligvda, and indidged in criminal intrigues with AGR A GR Lepidus her sister's husband, with Sopho- nius Tigellinus, with the freedman Pallas, and with whoever could promote her interest or ambition. Upon suspicion of being engaged in the conspiracy of Le- pidus, she was sent by Caligula, with her sister Julia, to the island Pontia (Ponza), on the Latian coast ; and the punishment of Agrippina was rendered more striking and severe by her being compelled to carry as far as Rome the urn that con- tained the ashes of her paramour. They must have returned in the early part of Claudius's reign, since in 41 Julia was again banished, and two years later put to death, Avith her cousin Julia, the daughter of Dnisus, at the instigation of Messalina. Agrippina experienced the hatred of Messalina, but had the art or the good fortune to elude it ; and the empress soon after (a.d. 48) fell a sacri- fice to her own shameless and insane ex- cesses. Agrippina aspired to rule Claudius and the empire. She had, how- ever, formidable rivals to contend with ; and, among others, JElia Petina, whom Claudius had already divorced, and Lollia Paullina, the daughter of M. Lollius. But the influence of Pallas, the favourite freedman of Claudius, and the opportu- nities which her relationship to the em- peror afforded for access and familiarity, gave Agrippina advantages she was not backward in using. Nothing but the ceremony was shortly wanting to com- plete the union of Claudius and Agrip- pina ; and although there were few precedents for the marriage of an uncle and a niece, Vitellius, who had ti-ansferred his services from Messalina to her suc- cessor, undertook to propose, and the obsequious senate sanctioned, the inno- vation. The government of Agrippina was more favourable to public morals and decorum than the loose misrule of Messalina. The court assumed the ap- pearance of virtue, and a decent veil of order and propriety was thrown over the darker vices of pride and hatred. Seneca (see Ann^us Seneca) was re- called from his banishment in Corsica, appointed to the prsetorship, and en- trusted with the education of the young Domitius (see Nero). The espousals of Domitius and Octavia, the daughter of Claudius by Messalina, were sanctioned by the senate : he was adopted into the Patrician house of the Claudii, and placed on an equality with Britannicus. (See Britannicus.) But Agrippina offended the prejudices of the Romans as much by hetpride, as 171 Messalina by her excesses. For her rapacity, the profusion of the late em- press afforded, perhaps, some excuse ; but her giving audience on a raised chair, beside the emperor, and beneath the standards of the praetorians ; her ridmg up to the capitol in a covered chariot a privilege hitherto confined to the mi- nisters of religion ; her presiding at naval games of extraordinary splendour upon the lake Fucinus [Lago di Celano] in a mantle of golden tissue ; her assump- tion of the title of Augusta, with her excessive favour and hatred, made Agrip- pina more dreaded, and hardly less ab- horred, than Messalina herself. Lollia Paullina, her rival, was sentenced to banishment by the senate, and com- pelled to die by Agrippina. Vitellius was rescued from an accusation of treason, and his accuser, Junius Lupus, interdicted from fire and water. Nor was Agrippina secure of her power until Lusius Geta and Rufus Crispinus were removed from the command of the prra- torians, and their office conferred upon Burrus Afranius, a man of ability and integrity, but not altogether insensible to his own interests. To display her power to the empire, as well as within the city, she established a colony of veterans in her birth-place, the chief town of the Ubii, from that time (a.d. 51) Colonia Agrippinensis, the modern Cologne. In a moment of drunken carelessness, Claudius remarked it had always been his fate to have bad wives, and to kill them. The hint was not thrown away ; and Agrippina having first removed Do- mitia Lepida, her rival in birth and intrigue and in the aftections of the fu- ture emperor (see Nero), turned her thoughts to the readiest mode of getting rid of Claudius. He had been for some time in ill-health, and had gone to Sinu- essa for the benefit of the air and the waters. An anxious consultation was held upon the different kinds of poison (see Claudius), and he was dispatched by an extract of mushrooms infused in some favourite dish, on his return to Rome. At first the entire administration was yielded to Agrippina. On the first day of the new reign, the symbol given to the cohort or guard was " Optima Mater," " the best mother." She appeared in puohc in the same litter with the emperor ; two lictors were assigned her; and, but for the adroit management of Seneca and Burrus, she wovdd have seated herself beside Nero upon the imperial throne, A G R AGU on solemn occasions of audience or state. And had not the praetorian prefect, and the tutor of the emperor, instilled milder counsels, the beginning of Nero's reign would have been as tragic as the later periods of it. Already, in the early days of her tutelage, Junius Silanus, proconsul of Asia, whose principal crime was being related to the house of the Caesars — and Narcissus, the rival of Pallas — had fallen victims to the fears or the hatred of Agrippina. But Nero's vices, and the imperious dis- position of Agrippina, who could give him an empire, but could not endure that any should reign but herself, rapidly dissolved the authority of Agrippina. Seneca and BuiTUS encouraged the loose follies of their pupil, to divert him from the darker vices of his mother. Claudius Senecio and Otho (see Otho) obtained an influ- ence over him, through his mistress Acte (see Nero), that was for some time un- known to, and then vainly resisted by, Agi-ippina. For the progi-ess of the quarrel between the son and widow of Domitius we must refer to Nero. In her attempts to regain her power she passed fi-om passionate opposition to the extremes of compliance, and criminal indidgence ; but Seneca and Burrus warned Nero against the arts of a woman always fonnidable and now false. In the fate of Britannicus, whom, in a mo- ment of excitement, she had called "a genuine Caesar," Agrippina read her own fall. Her residence was removed from the palace of Caesar to the house of An- tonia ; her guard withdrawn ; and, with the exception of a few women, whom affection or malice, habit or curiosity re- tained, the crowded retinue of the ex- empress dwindled to a few menials. Nero's visits were few ; he came attended by a numerous staff, and withdrew after a brief and formal salutation. Her wealth, which she amassed and husbanded with more diligence than ever, her talents for intrigue, her influence as the representa- tive of the Caesars, and her long habits of power, rendered her, however, a for- midable rival; and Nero had for some time desired her death, before the arts of Pop- paea led him to plan and accomplish it. Whether Seneca and Otho were ac- quainted with his pui-pose, is not ascer- tained ; but many consultations were held as to the mode of removing her without awakening her suspicions, or the indignation of the people at the enormity of the crime. Thrice poison was tried, but she was secured by antidotes ; the 172 ceiling of her bed-chamber was to have fallen upon her, but she had too many spies for accidents to succeed. At length Nero, feigning a wish for reconciliation, and industriously spreading the report of his repentance, induced her to celebrate the Quinquati'ia or Festival of Minerva (March 19) with him at Baiae. His de- meanour was full of well-acted fondness and regret ; and when she departed, a handsomely decorated galley was ready to convey her home. Although the night was unusually serene, and the sea calm, the vessel was expected to split at a proper distance from the land. This also failed; and Agrippina, although thrown over- board, swam to the shore. Her attend- ant Acen'onia was dispatched by a blow intended for herself; but she was wounded on the head by an oar, and arrived at her country house convinced that her life had been attempted, but that her only chance was in dissimulation. Nero, however, had gone too far to recede ; and Anice- tus, who had contrived the last attempt, was ordered to complete it. On pretence that the messenger who brought word of his mother's safety to Nero was an assas- sin, Anicetus was sent with a guard to put Agrippina to death. The murder was committed by the leader of the party, by Herculeius the commander of a trireme, and Oloaritus a centurion in the marine service. Agrippina was dispatched with many wounds, and frequently exclaimed " Ventrem feri," that had given birth to her son. For the events that followed, see Nero. AGRCECIUS, a rhetorician, extoUed by Ausonius in the fifteenth epigram of his work entitled Commeraoratio Profes- sovum Burdigalensiiun. Not any of this orator's works have been sufficiently au- thenticated to cite with certainty ; and even his real name appears to have been doubted by some writei's. AGRCETIUS. See Agroscius. AGUADO, (Francis,) a Spanish Jesuit, born 1366, atTorrejon, near Madrid, and entered the society of Jesuits at Alcala in 1588. He was governor of several houses of the order, presided over the province of Toledo, and was sent as deputy to the congregations at Rome. The king, Philip IV., selected him for his pi-eacher ; and the count Olivarez, when prime minister, appointed him his confessor. Aguado died at Madrid in 1654. His works, in six volumes folio, were printed at Madrid in 1629, and went through six subsequent editions. He publish'jd, also, a Life of Father A GU AGU Goudin, the Jesuit, 8vo, 1643; and left several unpviblished treatises. AGUCCHIA, an old engraver, known bylusengravingof the Cathedral of Milan. AGUCCHIO, (John Baptist,) arch- bishop of Amasia, born at Bologna, 1570; WHS educated by Philip Sega, his uncle, afterwards cardinal Sega, and by his brother Jerome Agucchio, who was also made cardinal by pope Clement VIII. in 1604. John Baptist applied himself with success to the study of polite literatm'e. He accompanied cardinal Sega to France, where he served as legate from the pope ; and after the death of that prelate was appointed secretary to cardinal Aldobran- dini, nephew to pope Clement, and at- tended him on his mission to Henry IV. of France. Of this embassy he has left a very pleasing and well-written account ; and so entirely did he conduct himself to his patron's satisfaction, that on his return the cardinal committed to him the management of his affairs, — a post which he filled up to the death of Clement VIII. and that of his brother the cardinal Agucchio, at which time his declining health obliged him to retire from the court. He then spent some time in Rome in study and retirement ; after which Aldobrandini again received him into his former employment, in which he continued till that cardinal's death. Subsequently he became secre- tary to Gregory XV., a situation which he held during the life of the pontiff; when his merits becoming more gene- rally appreciated, he was sent in 1624 by Urban VIII. as nuncio to the republic of Venice. Here he displayed his eminent qualities as a diplomatist, maintaining with ability the rights of the see of Rome, and making himself generally esteemed for his varied knowledge and acquirements, as well as the urbanity of his manners. He died at Friidi in 1632. Among his works are enumerated, A Treatise upon Comets and Meteors ; The Life of Cardinal Sega, and of his brother Jerome Agucchio ; and a Letter on the Origin of the City of Bologna, 1638, 4to ; besides various other letters and moral treatises not published. AGUESSEAU, (Henry Francis d', 1668 — 1751,) a statesman of distin- guished talents, born at Limoges, of a noble family, which had produced many able magistrates ; became at the age of only 22 years advocate-general of the parliament of Paris. The king, in ap- pointing him to an office so important, was guided entirely by his father's re- 173 commendation of him. " I know him to be incapable of deceiving me," said his majesty, " even in the case of his own son;" and the young advocate justified the choice which he had made. Denis Talon, who had obtained a high reputa- tion in the same office, declared " that he should have been proud to finish as this young man had begun." Aguesseau soon became procurator-general, an ofHce in which he had occasion to display new talents in the public service. He esta- blished an improved system in the hos- pitals ; restored order and discipline in tribunals ; and in the war of 1709, when public distress was followed by famine, he chsplayed equal energy and judgment, added to some of the noblest qualities of the heart. He presided over a com- mittee of the principal magistrates ; dis- covered and denounced the monopolizers and forestallers of provisions ; pvmished them, and restored public credit and con- fidence. From this time the value of his services was fidly appreciated, and on all emergencies, in all points of finan- cial as well as political difticidties, appeal was made to his judgment in order to decide upon the measures to be pursued. In the ultimate resort he alone was en- trusted to draw up memorials for the king. Towards the close of the reign of Louis XIV. he was first threatened with disgrace, owing to his stern refusal to register the famous bull Unigenitus. The authors of the Biographic Universelle here remark, tliat D 'Aguesseau, without profoundly inquiring into the doctrines condemned there, saw that this bull (Unigenitus) was in truth dangerous to the monarchy, and that he dared to defend the monarchy even against the monarch himself. He expressed this in so happy a manner to Quirini, the pope's nuncio, who came to visit him at Fresnes, that his own words oughf to be given. " It is here, then," said the nuncio, " that weapons are forged against Rome ! " " By no means," said D'Aguesseau : " these are not weapons, they are shields."* It was on this occasion, when going to the king at Versailles, that Madame D'Agues- seau addressed him in those noble words, • The history of the subsequent reception of this bull is briefly given in the continuation of Mosheira, vol. vi. pp. 204 — 210. But those who wish for full information on the subject of the Gallican church, besides the common sources of information, De Marca, Pithou, &c. will find many references, and much curious information, in the Report of the Select Committee of the House of Commons on the Regulation of Roman Catholic Subjects in Foreign States, printed in 1816; as well as in O'Sullivan and Phelan's Digest of the Roman Catholic Evi- dence, and Dr. Philpott's Letters to Butier. A GU A GU " Go, and before the king forget your wife and children ; lose every thing except your honour." Louis, however, died, and during the regency D'Agues- seau exercised all the influence which his virtues so well merited. In 1717 he succeeded Voisin as chancellor, but in- dignant at his opposition to the establish- ment of the royal bank and other projects of Mr. Law, the regent at length deprived him of the seals, which were given to D'Argenson, and ordered him into exile. His predictions, however, regarding the hollowness of the paper system, aiad its necessary results, could not be so easily banished ; and while the enlightened statesman and the benefactor of his coim- try was enjoying learned leisure and re- pose at his estate of Fresnes, in less than two years the bubble burst. The govern- ment became embarrassed ; the people dissatisfied ; and the regent was reduced to the humiliation of soliciting the man whom he had discarded from his councils to return and guide the helm of the half- shipwrecked state. From his windows at Fresnes this truly great man beheld Mr. Law himself, deputed by the regent, and accompanied by the Chevalier de Conflans, first gentleman of the chamber to the regent, approaching his house, as if in fulfilment of his evil prognostics to the letter, and thus affording him one of those triumphs of which the intellectual character has a right to be proud. He Avas restored to the service of his country ; and though blamed by some members of the parliament and men of letters for ac- cepting again of office, especially through the hands of Mr. Law, he had too much patriotism and magnanimity to notice their strictures, and justly considered it an honour to be recalled in the hour of danger. " He would have been more hlameable," it has been remarked, "had he refused wliat less resembled a favour than a reparation for injury offered by the head of the state." He thought it nobler to repair the mischief done in his absence, than to resent an affront. Instead of rushing upon national bankruptcy, as it was intended, he threw himself into the breach ; he refused to compromise the honour of a whole people ; and he met the notes issued by the bank, as far as the national resources and considera- tion for individuals would allow him. But another storm was gathering, which he was not prepared to oppose with his former resolution ; nor did he evince that consistency and decision of character which had before raised him so high in 174 the opinion of all parties. Tlie regent, who had coaxed the parliament into nul- lifying the will of Louis XIV. now urged D'Aguesseau to register the declaration in favour of the bull Unigenitus. This was intended to please Du Bois, now be- come archbishop of Cambray, who, in hopes of a cardinal's hat, had promised the court of Rome to endeavour to obtain this registration. M. D'Aguesseau had refused to do this, as we have seen ; but circumstances were now changed ; he considered it his duty to negociate with the parliament ; but the latter rejected his propositions, and the regent had then recom-se to the grand covmcil for the registration of the famous bull. In this solemn assembly the proposition made by the chancellor was still resisted by some members, and particularly by Perelle. D'Aguesseau inquired where he had found so many ingenious arguments against it? "In the pleadings of the late chancellor D'Aguesseau," was the unex- pected repartee ; and other sarcasms were launched against him on the same occa- sion. The court now threatened to banish the parliament of Blois, and the chan- cellor wished to resign the seals : the regent refused to accept them ; and at length the parliament consented to re- gister, with some modifications, which were the work of two counsellors, MM. Menguy and Pucelle, who possessed an overwhelming influence over the whole assembly. In 1722 he again lost the seals, owing to his refusal to give up the presidency of the council to cardinal Du Bois ; and as it was the object of that mini- ster to keep every man of virtue and cha- racter at a distance from court, the banish- ment of the chancellor was decided upon. D'Aguesseau did not reappear in public affairs till the year 1 727 : in the mean time parliament had continued at variance with the court ; and when cardinal De Fleury wished to engage his support for the latter, it was soon evident that he was considered to have compromised the cause which he had before so strenuously defended. Still he once more was chan- cellor in 1737; and wearied with the intrigues and affairs of the court, he confined himself to the discharge of his judicial duties, was most instru- mental in bringing the laws into a more sound condition, and in rendering their administration imiform throughout the country. He did not so much attempt a complete reform in the laws, as to de- termine their spirit ; and he published, as chancellor, many ordinances with this AG U A GU intention, especially those relating to testaments, donations, &c. and others relating to judicial proceedings, especially in cases of forgery, &c. Having reached the advanced age of 82, he felt himself, for the first time, vmequal to the dischai'ge of his high duties, and soon afterwards tendered his resignation to the king. The honours of the office of chancellor were, however, continued to him, and a royal pension of 100,000 francs, which he did not long enjoy. The death of this eminent lawyer and statesman took place Feb. 9, 1751. Louis XV. caused a magnificent monument to be erected over his tomb, which remained until destroyed by the revolutionary rabble. It has since been repaired at the public expense ; and in 1810 the statue of D'Aguesseau was placed before the peristyle of the legis- lative palace, parallel with that of the famous L'Hopital. This upi-ight magistrate and illustrious statesman was also one of tlie most ac- complished and extraordinary men of his age — the age of Louis XIV. His know- ledge of languages, ancient and modern, is said to have been at once extensive and accurate. Some of his biographers have iustly drawn our attention to the religious character of this statesman, as a refutation of the idle calumny, that Chris- tianity either shackles the understanding or retards the progress of knowledge. But on that topic it will be needless to enlarge : on those who can give any credit to such folly, his example, which is only one amidst a thousand as bright or brighter, would be lost ; and therefore we shall simply content ourselves with remarking his profound veneration for revealed religion, and his study to im- prove hunself by its precepts and its wisdom. As a statesman, his character has received the tribute of the highest praise from his contemporaries. St. Simon speaks of him thus : " Talent, in- dustry, penetration, universal knowledge, dignity, equity, piety, and innocence of life, are the foundation of M. D'Agues- seau's character." He certainly modifies this encomium by accusing him of tardi- ness and indecision in the business of liis court. "When I remember," said D'Aguesseau to the count Cereste Bran- cas, who reproached him on this score, " that a decision of the chancellor is a law, I may be allowed to reflect long before I pronounce it." It has also been said of him (especially by Duclos, in his Memoirs) that he wanted the firmness to carry through those measures which he 175 thought right and necessary, and espe- cially that he dared not introduce certain measiu-es, of which he approved, in order to diminish the expenses of suits, for fear of injuring the attorneys and others who lived by them. How- ever, on these points it is difficidt now to give a judgment, from want of exact information ; and his contemporaries were not without their prejudices, and were perhaps anxious to find some faults in one whom they could not help esti- mating so highly. His pleadings and his judgments support the high character which they always bore ; the learning they display, and their beautiful simplicity and elegance, and above all their clear- ness, render them admirable models of forensic writing. His eloquence was sometimes highly touching ; and an in- stance is recorded where, in pronouncing the evdogium of M. Nain, his colleague and friend, " he was interrupted by his own grief, and by the sobs of all who heard him." Among his works (in the 13th vol.) is found an eulogiimi on his father, not intended to be published, fi'om which it appears that he was a man of most amiable character, and an useful public functionary. He (i. e. his father) was highly instrumental in finishing the canal of Languedoc, in founding cloth manufactories, and above all, during the season of the cruel persecution of the Pro- testants, after the revocation of the edict of Nantes, he showed himself so tolerant that he was recalled from the government of his province. He was also the first to suggest the formation of the order of St. Louis. The works of D'Aguesseau, com- prised in 13 vols. 4to, were published at Paris, 1759-89. AGUESSEAU, (Henri Cardin Jean Baptiste, Marquis d',) a grandson of the great chancellor, was born at the castle of Fresnes, 1746. Less indebted to his talents than to his name for the favours bestowed by Napoleon, he did not justify the expectations early formed of him, although raised to a succession of legal dignities till he was made pre- sident of the court of appeal at Paris. In 1803, he was sent as minister-pleni- potentiai-y to Copenhagen ; was made a senator in 1805, a count of the empire, and commandant of the legion of honour. In the senate, he was the mere instru- ment of imperial intrigue and despotism ; but of too weak a character to com- promise himself, he was equally favoured upon the Restoration ; made a peer of France, but disappeared during the A GU A G U hiuidred days, nnr resumed his honours and dignities till after the second resto- ration. These however obtained for him the additional honour of being elected member of the French academy ; where his influence, however, was beneficially exerted, no less than in promoting many useful and charitable institutions, in all which his ready assistance to the extent of his means, and his real kindness of heart, gained him the esteem which not the most brilliant talents could have done. He passed the latter years of his life at Fresnes, and died in January, 1826. AGUILA, (C. J. E. H. d',) an officer, of whose origin, life and adventures, little is known beyond what he has him- self recorded in a preface containing an itinerary prefixed to one of his works. He appears to have been an indefatigable traveller; and his first voyage, in 1770, was to the New World. From America he went to England, and in 1772 pro- ceeded in company with some parties interested in a political mission to Stock- holm, and was thus enabled to form correct opinions by mixing with men of different views respecting Sweden and its connexions with other powers. He made no fewer than seven voyages through the whole extent of the Baltic, one into the Northern seas, and another across the Frozen sea. He then visited the lakes of Bothnia, parts of Finland, Abo, St. Petersburgh, and Upsal. Sailing from Denmark through the straits of the Sound, he tried to make out the situation of the celebrated observatory of Urani- boin-g, of which, however, he could per- ceive no traces. In 1774, he took ship at Venice for Constantinople, and from the last city returned to France ; quitted that country at the Revolution, and went upon a commission from the emigrant princes, according to his own account, to the court of Sweden. His narrative of events commences from 1798, and he returned to France in 1802. Besides the narrative of his voyages, he published a variety of works, political, scientific, astronomical, &c. some of which are written in Latin, and for an enumeration of which the reader is refen-ed to the Biographic Universelle. AGUILLON, (Francis d', 1567 — 1617,) a Jesuit of Brussels, who was the first to introduce the study of mathe- matics among his contemporaries in the Low Countries. He became professor of philosophy at Douay, and of theology at Antwerp, where he was also rector. He 176 is the author of a treatise upon Optics in 6 books, (Antwerp, 1613 ;) and it is in this work that mention is made for the first time of the term — Projection stcrengra- phique, notwithstanding that it \vas known from the time of Hipparchus. (Biog. Univ. Gen. Diet.) AGUIRRE, (Juan Saens de, 1630— 1699,) a native of Logroiio, was first a Benedictine monk, and rose through the gradations of the hierarchy until he reached the dignity of cardinal. His Ludi Salmanticenses, his Opera Varia, his S. Anselmi Theologia, and his Col- lectio Concilioi-um omnium Hispanic, attest his gi-eat erudition, his solid judg- ment, and his piety. The same praise cannot be passed on his Defensio Cathe- drae S. Petri, which carries the notions of the papal prerogative to a very high pitch. For this reason it was condemned in Spain, which has always been the advocate of her own ecclesiastical inde- pendence, except in a few unimportant matters ; and by the church of France it was equally reprobated. Great has always been the mortification of the Italians that they could not force their abominably slavish doctrines on the clergy of those two great kingdoms : papal infallibility is scouted by both, especially by that of Spain, which has generally declared against all interference of the pope in the dis- cipline and government of the national church. But if cardinal Aguirre was a mistaken, he was a good man, and he had the esteem of those who differed from him. Even Bossuet, the great advocate of the Galilean church, calls him "a light of the church," "a model of the virtues," an "example of piety." His great collection of coins (continued by Catalani) is highly valuable for the history of Spain. AGUIRRE, (Lope de,) a native of Oiiate in Guipiscoa, early in the sixteenth century ; has obtained a terrible immor- tality in the annals of ci-ime. Allured, like so many others of his poor country- men, to the shores of Peru, l.e there dis- tinguished himself by his vicious quali- ties. But his former atrocities sink into the shade when compared with those which he committed during the expedi- tion of Pedro de Orsua into the interior of South America, in quest of the ima- ginary El Dorado. It was in the year 1.560 that the expedition descended the Huallaga. Aguirre was one of the leaders. His first stop was to involve the party in treason, that none of them could have any hope of pardon from the A GU A H L king of Spain ; and he succeeded so far as to persuade Orsua to assume tlie regal title. They were ahout to discover a new and rich coimtry ; in it they would found a new kingdom ; — and a fig for Don Philip at home ! His next step was to murder the puppet king, and usurp the command. Many were the monsters whom Spain sent to the New World, but never was any so savage as this Lope de Aguirre. He put to death all whom he suspected — all whom he disliked — all who displeased him in the minutest point ; and though alike hated and feared by all, he retained his ascendancy to the last. The crimes, the whimsical proceedings of this tyrant, would fill a volume ; and they do fill one, which we owe to Southey — TheExpedition of Orsua, and the Crimes of Aguirre. At length, being deserted by the few men whom his cruelty had spared, he was assailed and killed by the Spanish autho- rities of Venezuela. AGYL^US, (Henry,) an advocate and law-writer, born at Bois-le-duc about 1533, was also distinguished as a Greek scholar. In early life he bore arms against the king of Spain ; was ap- pointed deputy to the States-general, a member of the supreme council, and advocate-fiscal. He was still more dis- tinguished for his learning and writings. He died April 1595. He was eminent likewise for his correct and enlarged editions of the Roman and other laws. (Biog. Univ.) AHLE, (John Rodolph,) born at Mul- hausen in 1G25, went to Gottingen in 1643, where he pinrsued his studies imder J. A. Fabricius. From there he passed to the university of Erfvu-t two years subsequently, where he established the musical school of St. Andrew, of which he was made director. In 1649, he was chosen organist to the church of St. Blaise at Mulhausen ; became a councillor some years afterwards, and finally obtained the office of burgo- master. He died at the age of 48. He composed and published a variety of pieces, besides some treatises which we cannot here enumerate. Among others are — 1. Dialogues Spirituels ; Erfurt, 1648. 2. Compendium pro Tenellis ; 8vo, Erfurt 3. Trente Symphonies, Padouannes, AUemandes, &c. ; to five instruments; Erfurt, 1650. 4. Thimn- gischerLustgarten ; Erfurt, 1657. Besides others of a sacred character, a list of which is to be found in the Biographic Universelle. AHLE, (John George,) son of the VOL. I, 177 preceding, also a musical professor ; suc- ceeded his father at Midhausen, became a senator, and died there in 1707. He was also celebrated as a poet, having been honoured with the laurel crown as early as 1680. A great part of his works, however, were lost in the great fire at Midhausen in 1689; though the names of a number of them have sur- vived, which are given at length in the same biographical work which contains those of his father. AHLWARDT, (Christian Wilhelm, 1760 — 1830,) professor of ancient litera- ture in the university of Greifswald, and a celebrated linguist. He was a native of Griefswald, and educated in early youth under Hagemeister, the rector of the grammar school (Gelehrtensclude), at Anklam, from whom he probably im- bibed his love of Homer. A character- istic anecdote is related of him at this season. One of the assistant-masters, in lecturing on the New Testament, which was nearly the extent of the Greek taught in schools then, had called Homer a liar. " That is not true, sir," said the bold young scholar. " Have you read Homer?" was the reply. "Yes, sir," said Ahlwardt. " Well, then," replied his master, " you may be right, for I have, not." Ahlwardt's habits at the university were peculiar ; he would lock liimself up for some weeks together, (only opening his door for food, &c.) and mas- ter some author, or some new language ; and then, by way of relaxation, plunge into all the excesses of a wild student, till some new object engaged his attention. Having entered into a private family as teacher in 1782, he quitted it in 1783, and became a private teacher of ancient and modern languages at Greifswald. His pay was wretched, and his work was in- cessant; but he found time to publish some romances, and some remarks on the Idylls of Theocritus. In 1792 he left Rostoch, and in order to maintain his wife (for he had now married) and him- self, he took a situation in a school at Demmin, and there he laboured besides with public lectures and private pupils, the latter of which he was obliged to take early and late, just in such hours as his duties left free. Here he learned Arabic, and translated Callimachus, of whose epigrams he said, that to compare them with Italian madrigals v/ould be doing them too much honour, and that all the Greek epigrams together were not worth a few odes of Sappho or Alcaeus ! He now translated part of Ariosto, and in N A H L AHM 1795, in Wieland's German Mercury, he gave specimens of a translation of Camoens's Lusiad, in otfuve rime. In 1795, Michaelis made him rector of the grammar school of Anklam. He was here also ill-paid, and left it after two years. He was much dissatisfied here with one of the duties of this situation — viz. preach- ing in a small chiu-ch on Sunday after- noons; and as the other clergy, to whom he was subordinate, sometimes announced to him on Saturday e\^ening that he was to preach the next day, he used to read a printed discourse. On one occasion he had the ill-luck to stumble upon a thanks- giving sermon after a fire, which he was obliged to go through with. In 1797 he became rector of the gymnasium at 01- denbtu'g, where he remained fourteen years ; and, besides other employments, made himself master of Gaelic, and translated much of Ossian (Leipzig, 1811), for which he is best known. Balbi and Himiboldt have praised his knowledge of Gaelic. In 1811 he was officially called to Greifswald, where he remained to the day of his death, quar- relling with most of those around him, whom he called half-educated, and com- paring them to the inhabitants of Krah- winkel in Kotzebue's Comedy. Indeed he seems to have been rather of a snarl- ing disposition, a portion of which he may partly have owed to the French Encyclopedists and Voltaire, whose works misled him in early life, and partly to his struggles with poverty. To his scholars he apparently made himself pleasant, but there was much that appears unamiable in his character ; and if the extracts of his own letters, given by his biographer, may be trusted, he was one who, though he satirized others, was not without his own absurdities. His life gives so curious a picture of the labours and studies of a German scholar of the last age, that more detail has been entered into than would otherwise be justifiable, although his works are highly esteemed in Ger- many. The chief of them are trans- lations, remarks on Latin verbs, on Ho- meric verse, and other philological essays ; but his fame rests on his Ossian. He published, in the Greifswald Academical Archives, an Essay on the Nibelungen Lied. He left a Portuguese Lexicon in MS. and published a grammar and chres- tomathyin the same langviages. (Schro- der, in Hasse's Zeitgenossen, Third Se- ries ; 3d Band. No. xviii.) AHLWARDT, (Peter,) a professor of logic and metaphysics at Greifswald, 178 was born in that town, Feb. 19, 1710, and died there in March, 1791. His father was a poor shoemaker ; and it was only by the practice of economy derived from this source, that his son was enabled to pursue his studies in the outset of his distinguished career. He became the founder of an order which he entitled the Abelites, of which the laudable object was the observance of perfect candour and sincerity. His favourite maxim was, — " Give all the attention in your power to the subject, however trivial, with which you are occupied for the moment." He was also of opinion that to the want of this attention was to be attributed our lukewarmness in the cause of virtue, and the greater number of the vices of mankind. He imputed to his strict observance of his own rule, his unshaken attachment to the duties of his office and of religion. His principal works are — 1. Brontotheologie ; pious meditations on the phenomena of thunder and light- ning; Greifswald, 1745. Svo ; translated into Dutch, 1747. 2. Reflections on the Augsbm'gh Confession; 3 vols. 1742. 3. Some Sermons and Philosophical Dissertations. AHMED BEN FARES, surnamed El Razy, a lexicographer and lawyer, con- temporary with the celebrated Djewhary. He was the author of an Arabic Dic- tionary, of which there is a MS. copy in the Leyden library, and another in the Bodleian. He also produced some works on jurisprudence ; and died in Hamdan about the year 999 of the Christian era. AHMED BEN ALHASSAN, a poet and a robber of the twelfth century, was a native of Silves, in Algarve. Origin- ally a merchant, his ambition led him to despise his calling ; he thirsted for power, which, as he was not likely to attain it by ordinary means, he hoped to procure by a reputation for sanctity. Giving his wealth to the poor, he retired to a moimtain solitude, to occupy himself with devout contemplation, and with observances much akin to those which during the same period a Christian en- thusiast would have adopted. Ahmed, as a true Mussidman would say, had no vocation for the state ; his converts were of a dissipated character ; all soon fomied a noble company of robbers ; and their depredations were lamented by the whole country. Yet all this time he did not lay aside his spiritual character : he was still the prophet destined for the i-egene- ration of men ; and not a few of his de- luded followers began to regard him as A H M A H M a true imam. The facility with which sevei-al villages owned his temporal no less than his spiritual sway, and above all his conquest of Mertola in the Alem- tejo, added strength to the delusion. He was now joined by a body of Almo- ravides, with whom he reduced Evora, Silves, and even Seville. At length for- tune deserted him, and to escape the vengeance of his enemies, he swallowed poison. The ally and colleague of this bandit chief was Mohammed ben Omar, a na- tive of the same city. Mohammed studied the law at Seville ; but his am- bition being too great for so humble a sphere, he too fled from the society of men to acquire sanctity in retreat. But, as in the case of his friend Ahmed, liis sanctity was only the means to an cii J ; on the solitary sea coast of the Algarves liis hut soon arose to attract the atten- tion of the pious. Like Ahmed, he had soon his disciples ; but perceiving that the latter was advancing to empire, he joined him, and contributed with all his might to the success of the new prophet. To raise Ahmed to the throne of Anda- lusia, was his great object; and to attain it he displayed a valour which even liis friend and chief could not equal. In the sequel, however, he seems to have abandoned his chief; or perhaps he wished to reign as Ahmed's vassal : we know that for twelve days he did reign at Cordova ; that he fled, was van- quished, committed to prison, deprived of his eyes, released by the Almohades, and sent to Africa, whei'e he ended his days, A. H. 574. Who would have thought that spirits so turbulent as tliese would have found delight in the most pacific of arts ? Yet both are said by Mohammedan critics to have excelled in it. (Casiri. Conde. Dunham. AHMED BEN MOHAMMED, (Abu Amru,) a poet and historian of Jaen, who died through excessive drinking in 970. He was the first of the Spanish Arabs who composed epic poems in the oriental style. The fragments preserved of him prove that he had vigour and genius. A more useful work, of which both Casiri and Conde have availed themselves, is the Annals of Spain under the Dynasty of the Omeyas. AHMED BEN THOULOUN, (Aboul Abbas,) chief of an Egyptian dynasty, was born at Samirra in a.h. 220 (a.d. 835). He was first named governor of Egypt, where, profiting by the weakness of the 179 khalifs, he soon rose to sovereign power. He extended his conquests ; became master of Barca, and even Damascus, nor stopped till he can'ied his arms to the gates of Tarsus, when exhaustion and famine at length placed bounds to his ambition. While subsequently en- gaged in the conquest of Syria, one of his ministers, in 882, organized an insur- rection, which he was unable to quell ; and not long afterwards, a.m. 270, he died at Antioch, from the effects of di-inking too much milk. He is represented by historians as generous and brave, dis- tinguished for promptness and dispatch, just towards his subjects, and the pro- tector of men of letters. He kept open palace both for grandees and for the people, besides distributing monthly 1000 dynars to the poor. The founder of a dynasty known by the name of theThou- lounides, wliich continued till a.d. 905, when it was destroyed by the khalif Mok- tafy, who conquered and killed Haroun, great-gi-andson of Ahmed. (Biog. Univ.) AHMED SHAH L'ABDALY, founder of Candahar, rose from the character of a mere partisan into a distinguished com- mand. Of the illustrious family of the Seidou, of the tribe of the Affghans, he was in his youth imprisoned with his brother in a fortress by Hussein Khan, governor of Candahar. He owed his freedom to Nadir Sliah during his invasion of the province, and followed the fortmies of that conqueror. He distinguished him- self in his service ; and upon the assassi- nation of his benefactor, after making every effort to bring the delinquents to justice, he made an able retreat, and repulsed all the attacks of the Persian army. After intercepting a convoy with immense treasure, he brought off the Affghans safe to their mountains ; and both at Candahar and Kaboul was i-aised to the sovereign authority. He assumed the title of Ahmed Shah, carried his armies to the north of the Indus, andj becoming master of the territories of the Grand Mogul, celebrated at Delhi the alliance of his eldest son, Timur Shah, with the daughter of Alem Guyr II. It did not prevent the Affgiians from pur- suing their conquests ; and in 1758 Ahmed was called by the nabobs into Hindustan, to oppose the power of the Mahratta chiefs. Being joined by the Rajahs, he pushed on ; but his fortunes had reached their zenith ; he could not resist the combination of Mahratta chiefs ; they took Delhi, and the imperial family and all their treasures fell into the hands N 2 AHM AHU of the victors. But in the campaign of 1761 he again attacked and routed tliem with immense slaughter ; subdued tlie Sikhs, and opened to the Affghans the route to Cashmir. That fine country was ceded to them by the treachery of the governor ; and, after a chequered but brilliant career, Ahmed Shah died, not far from the city of Candahar, begun by Nadir and finished by himself, trans- mitting the sovereignty to his eldest son Timnr. (Biog. Univ.) AHMED DJESAIR. See Aveis II. AHMED KHAN, the ninth emperor of Mogul ; succeeded his brother, Abaka Khan, 681 of the Hejira, and was the first of the dynasty who embraced Islam- ism ; by this step he became involved in continual broils with his family. He deprived the Jewish doctors and astro- logers of their pensions, and declared himself a zealous friend of the Mus- sulmans. He I'aised magnificent mosques upon the ruins of ancient temples. In- dignant at these innovations, the emirs united with his brother to overthrow his authority ; but being discovered, the latter was seized and put to death, and the insurgent princes were thrown into dungeons. Still his court continued a prey to factions, and his nephew, Arghoun Khan, had recourse to amis, was conquered, and made prisoner. Be- ing freed, however, by some rebellious emirs, he reappeared at the head of an army, pxu'sued, and made himself master of the emperor's person, whom he con- signed to the vengeance of Khanghour- Pai's children. He was subjected to the fate Avhich he had inflicted upon his brother, after a reign of two years and nine months, in 1284, — an example of the danger of attempting imnecessary innovations. (Biog. Univ.) AHMED RESMY HADJY, a coun- cillor and chancellor of the Sublime Porte ; was employed by Mustapha III. as ambassador to the court of the empress Maria Theresa, in 1758. Having suc- ceeded perfectly in the pacific mission upon which he was sent, he was invested with still greater powers, and repaired to the Prussian court to congratulate Fre- derick the Great upon the brilliant vic- tories which he had gained over the Russians, the Austrians, and the French. By the new treaty concluded with Prussia, advantageous to both countries, he ren- dered distinguished services to the Porte, and Ahmed did not return to Constan- tinople till the year 1763. The account ■given by this able diplomatist of his em- 180 bassies, contains some brief but piquant observations, with remarks iipon the countries he visited, and the remarkable characters with Avhom he came in con- tact. They are the more curious from the peculiar prejudices and points of view which the)' exhibit. His respect for the talents of the great Frederick, as a soldier and a politician, led him to devote a whole chapter to the subject. There are two of these productions, and both have been inserted in the annals of the Ottoman empire by Ahmed-Ouassyf- EfFendi, between the periods of 1754 and 1774, printed in Turkish at Scutari, 2 vols, folio. They have been translated into German, and published by M. Nicolai, with notes by him, by the translator, and by Major Menu de Minotoli, a Prussian oflicer. Berlin, 1809. (Biog. Univ.) AHUITZOL, the eighth monarch of the Astequi, or ancient Mexicans, suc- ceeded in 1477 to Axejacatli, whom he had maintained on the throne. He en- larged the bounds of the empire by adchng a new province, — an obligation contracted by all emperors on their ac- cession, and as the historical reader will recollect, by other potentates than those of Mexico. When this object was at- tained, he suddenly renounced conquest, and applied his revenues to the encou- ragement of the useful arts, and the embellishments of his capital. He was, however, too fond of splendour, con- sidering his limited means ; and on one occasion his improvements were nearly fatal to him. He brought to Te- nochtitlan, (the modern city of Mexico,) the waters of the river Huitzilopochoco, by means of an aqueduct, and the dis- charge of the superfluous waters into the lake Tezcuco considei-ably increased the bulk of the latter. A courtier ventured to acquaint him with the danger which menaced the capital, and was put to death for the boldness, — a melancholy instance of despotism in a state yet in its infancy, and half savage. The element flowed into the streets; even the im- perial palace was filled by it; and the monarch, while striving to flee, nearly lost his life. To repair the mischief, he caused a ditch to be enlarged, which Montezuma I. had dug. His subsequent conduct was more rational. He endea- voured to abolish the horrible custom of iminolating prisoners to the native gods ; and if he did not wholly extii-pate, he greatly diminished the evil. He died universally regretted, and was succeeded by Montezuma II., destined to a painful AH U A 1 U immortality from liis tragical end by the Spanish conqueroi-s. (Biog. Univ.) AIBEK, (Azecl Eddyn,) first sultan of Egypt, of the dynasty of the Baharyte Mamaliikes, was by birth a Tm"k, and usurped part of the power of the descend- ants of Saladin. The power of the fa- mous Mamalukes took its origin in the body-guard of these princes, who, having experienced the ti'eachery of their own families and their troops, purchased young slaves at Mogol, and had them brought up apart and strictly disciplined ; when, their education being completed, they became freedmen, and the highest offices and dignities were placed within their view. Being brought up in an island of the Nile, opposite Cairo, they were called Baharytes or Maritimes, as Arabs call great rivers Bahar or Sea. They rose rapidly into repute ; and among the bravest the com'age and talents of Aibek shone conspicuous ; and in the Egyptian campaigns against St. Louis in 1 250, he sustained, at the head of his companions, the shock of the French h""orse. St. Louis was taken piisoner, and in a subsequent meeting of the Baharytes, the sultan being assassinated, Aibek was raised to the chief command of the troops. They were preparing to put the king of France and the other prisoners to death, when Aibek, aware of the value of their ran- som, drew his sword, and declared that he would never permit so base a violation of military faith. They were restored to liberty. Aibek espoused the queen Shadir Eddour, and for some period exercised the supreme authority, till tlie jealousy of the Mamalukes induced him to surrender it while he retained the military power. Melek-Al-Acln-af, the pupil of Aibek, was then raised to the throne. Egypt and Syria were then separate empires, and had each their sultan. The Syrian sultan advanced against Aibek with a powerftd army, and gained some advantage, but was eventually worsted, and compelled to submit to the conqueror's terms. Elated with succesS; he deprived the young pi'ince of his crown ; when his consort, suspecting that it was his intention to espouse the young daughter of the king of Moussoul, caused the new sultan to be assassinated just as he considered him- self firmly seated in his power. He was cut off April 1257, (a.h. 665.) From his character and exploits, Aibek was named Melek-el-Moezz, or " Mighty King;" he was attached to literature and science ; and erected a superb college in old Cairo, upon the banks of the Nile. The 181 first sultan of the race of the Baharytes, or Egyptian Mamalukes, so great was the veneration in which his talents and services were held, that his death was speedily revenged by his army ; and his son Aly, by the name of Melek-al-Man- sour, the Victorious, was raised to the supreme power upon his death, but was soon deposed again by Kouthouz. (See the name, and see also Baekok. Biog. Univ.) AICARDO, (John,) an Italian archi- tect, born in Piedmont, repaired to Genoa the beginning of the seventeenth century, and was employed in the construction of store-houses near the gate of St. Thomas. He also built other public edifices — the choir of the church of St. Dominick, and tlie magnificent aqueduct which supplies the whole town of Genoa. This splendid undertaking was only completed in the year of Aicardo's death, in 1625, when it was finished by his son Giacomo, an artist of very great merit, who executed a variety of beautiful works, particularly the elegant foimtain near the Ponte Reale. Giacomo died in 1650. AICARTS DE FOSSAL, a trouba- dour of the tliirteenth century, known as the author of a curious production upon the contest for the crown of Naples, which Innocent IV. had bestowed upon prince Edmund, son of Henry III. of England, to the prejudice of Conrad IV. king of the Romans. The poet assumes that the crown had been given to Charles, duke of Anjou, although in fact it was not till the death of Conrad that Clement concluded a treaty with Charles. He draws a startling picture of the liorrors of war, and pronounces in favour of no one of the candidates. "The eagle," he says, " boasts a title so near the flower, that it was impossible for the laws to decide, and the decretals are opposed to neither. For this cause they will descend into the plains, and he who shall make the stoutest defence will doubtless carry the day." AICHER, (Otho,) a Benedictine, and professor of grammar, poetry, rhetoric, and history, at Saltzbm'g, where he died in 1705. He wrote commentaries on Tacitus, &c. His principal works were printed at Saltzburgh. (Biog. Univ.) AID AN, (d. 651,) bishop of Lindis- farne, or Holy Island. This prelate was originally a monk of the island of Hij or lona, one of the Hebrides, from which he was sent to preach Christianity to the subjects of Oswald, king of Northumber- land, in the year 631 or 635. (See Ste- venson's Bede, p. 193.) It appears that Oswald had requested a priest for this A I D AI G purpose from the Scots, and tliat the priest who was sent was a man of such austere manners, that he made no im- pression on the people. On his return to lona without success, the monks de- liberated what steps ought to be taken, and Aidan addressed the unsuccessful missionary thus : " It appears to me, brother ! that you have made no progress because you were more severe than was proper with ignorant hearers, and did not, according to the apostolic custom, first feed them with the milk of mild doctrine, until they were able to receive the more perfect law, and keep the purer precepts of God." The impression made on the assembly by this specimen of moderation at once induced them to offer the appointment to Aidan, who accepted it, and became bishop of Lindisfarne. This story, however, Bede only mentions as a report current in his day, not as an authentic history for which he could vouch. But to Northumberland Aidan was sent, and was eminently successful in promoting religion. On the death of Oswald, in 641, (Bede, iii. 12,) Aidan continued his labours inider his suc- cessors, Oswi, king of Deira, and Oswin, king of Bernicia, (Bede, iii. 14,) the two provinces into which his kingdom was divided. Oswin was very dear to him for his numerous virtues, and especially for the humility he had shown in receiv- ing a rebuke from the mouth of Aidan ; and on his death Aidan took it so much to heart, that he survived him only twelve days, and died Aug.31, 651. (Bede,iii.l4.) The character given of Aidan by Bede is very striking : his activity in visiting his diocese, chiefly on foot, his humility, his constancy in prayer, meditation, and scriptural study even on his journeys, and in the house of the king, bespeak him a truly apostolic bishop. The anec- dote related of his humility in giving a splendid horse richly caparisoned (a pre- sent to him from the king) to a beggar, who solicited alms, savours more of im- pulse than judgment. Some miracles are attributed to him by Bede, which hardly deserve serious consideration ; but the prediction of Oswin 's death, as one too humble and holy to live long on earth, is curious enough. Bede, how- ever, gives us to understand that how- ever holy Aidan was, he was wrong in his views respecting the time of keeping Easter — he was a stiirdy quartadeciman ! It must be understood that this term does not imply that he would keep Easter on any dav except Sunday, but iS2 only that he included the 14th day of the moon and excluded the 21st as days on which it might be kept. (See Usher. Britt. Eccles. Antiquit. p. 479 ; and see also his Discourse of the Religion of the Irish, ch. ix. and x. and his Veteitim Epistolarum Hibernicarum Sylloge, Ep. Bingham, Ant. xx. 5. 2. &c.) This XI dispute may now appear of trifling im- portance, although serious inconvenience was felt from it in those days — some fasting and some feasting at the same moment, and each party blaming the other. But whatever may have been its importance then, it is happy for us that it occurred, and that it has been re- corded as one of the many proofs of the independence of the early British cliurches on tlie church of Rome. There is also a pleasing trait recorded of Oswald by Bede, viz. that while Aidan, who knew English imperfectly, was preaching to the people, Oswald, who had been long in Scotland, would translate for his audience (iii. 3). The immediate suc- cessor of Aidan in Lindisfarne, whither he transferred the see in 635 (from York), was Finan, who was succeeded by Col- man, who is called by Chalmers the suc- cessor of Aidan. The authorities quoted above will enable the reader who is de- sirous of more details on this pi-elate, to investigate his history more minutely, but he will do well also to consult the Annals of Tigernach, and of Ulster, published by Dr. O 'Conor, as refei-red to in Mr. Stevenson's edition of Bede ; and the Book of Armagh, pviblished in Sir W. Betham's Irish Antiquarian Re- searches. The Roman Catholic account of Aidan is in Bollandus, Mens. Aug. vol. vi. p. 688. (Bede, Usher, &c.) AIGNAN, (Stephen, 1775—1824,) a very laborious French writer, horn at Beaugency, 1773, and educated at Or- leans. At the age of 19 he was named procureur-general-syndic for the depart- ment of the Loire, and was for a period can-ied away by the republican mania of the times. According to the authors of the Bibliotheque Royaliste, he was known by the appellation of ^'Brutus;" but his conduct was moderate and humane, and he was soon conducted a prisoner to the Conciergerie. He was saved by the death of Robespierre ; resumed his public func- tions amidst the congratulations of his fellow - citizens ; and received public thanks, as one among the first who had denoimccd the system of terror which led to the downfall of the de- stroyer. He was chosen to compose the A I G A I G funeral orations to the memory of the fallen citizens ; and he wrote a tragedy ujjon the execution of Louis XVI. by wliicli he ran the utmost risk of losing his own life ; subsequently he became secretary-general of the prefecture of the Cher, and accompanied the pre- fect, M. De Lufay, to Paris, where he devoted himself with assiduity to the cultivation of letters. He was employed by Napoleon, and also by Louis XVIII. on his first restoration, but having again taken office under Napoleon, he was not in office after the 100 days. His works consist of tragedies, most of which were unsuccessful, novels, and political pieces. The latter are more valua])le, and among them the following may be noticed :— 1. De la Justice et de la Police, &c. ; Paris, 1817. (" This was occasioned by the affiiir of the black pin." Biog. Univ. Supp.) 2. De I'Etat des Protestants en France de- puis le 16"ie Siecle jusqu'a nos Jours, &c. ; Paris, 8vo, 1819. In this he com- pared the persecution of Louis XVI. to the reign of terror, which caused a con- siderable controversy, in which Benj. Constant took the part of Aignan, but rather modified the view he had taken. Aignan's own reply to his opponents was in the Minerve, and in the second edition of his book. One of his chief oppo- nents was M. Auger, in the 12th No. of the Spectateur Politique et Litteraire. i'5. Des Coups d'Etat dans la Monarchie Constitutionelle ; 1813. 4. Histoire du Jury; 1822. His more important literary works are — 1 . Bibliotheque Etrangere d'Hist. et de la Litterature Ancienne et Moderne; 1823-4, 3 vols. 8 vo. There were to be six. 2. Extraits des Memoires relatifs a I'Histoire de France, depuis I'annee 1787 jusqu'a la Revolution, &c. AIGNEAUX, (Robert and Anthony, le Chevalier Sieurs d',) two brothers, born at Vire, in Normandy, towards the middle of the sixteenth century, whose lives and pursuits were so inseparably connected as to render the relation of one that of both of them. The encou- ragement given by Francis I. to the fine arts, diffused a taste for them even into the provinces ; Normandy became dis- tinguished for the number of its students ; and among these the two brothers were not the least conspicuous. They first devoted themselves, at Paris and at Poictiers, to the study of law and medicine ; and having gone through a course of general science and literatm'e, they again with- drew to their native seat, and gave them- selves up wholly to the cidtivation of 183 poetry. They translated tlie works of Virgil and Horace ; the former in lieroic verse, which contributed considerably to their reputation. The Virgil appeared in 1582 in 4to, and there was soon another edition m 8vo, with the Latin text ; and at the close appears the translation of the Moretura, and some other pieces attributed to Virgil. The version of Horace was not equally happy, nor was it so successful. This appeared in 1588, and was followed by other poems, printed at the close of a collection of commendatory pieces in their praise, and published by their coun- trjTuan Sallieres. Both these amiable men died young. AIGREFEUILLE, (Charles d',) a French doctor of theology, and canon of the cathedi-al of Montpellier, lived towards the middle of the eighteenth centmy. He wrote the history of that town from its origin — a work published in folio, 1737, and extending to twenty books. Although little known beyond the country of the authoi-, it has been highly spoken of by contemporary critics, and the most learned writers of other countries. It was fol- lowed by the Histoire Ecclesiastique de Montpellier, 1739, fol. in thirteen books. The family of Aigrefeuille, in Langue- doc, produced several other characters of some note in the clerical and magisterial annals of that province. AIGUEBERRE, (John Dumas d',) a councillor in the parliament of Thoulouse, lived in the eighteenth century, and is known as the author of several works. He published — 1. Les Trois Spectacles, 1 729, 8vo, consisting of a sort of prologue in prose; of Polixene, a tragedy, in verse ; and of L'Avare Amoureux, a comedy in one act. Also, 2. Pan and Doris, an heroic pastoral, or sort of opera, which was set to music by Mouret, and repre- sented with success ; besides many other di'amatic pieces. AIGUILLES. See Boyer. AIGUILLON, (Marie Madeleine de Vignerod, Duchesse d' ; d. 1675,) a daughter of Rene de Vignerod, lord of Pont Courlay, and Frances Duplessis, sister of cardinal Richelieu ; first appeared as maid of honour to the queen Mary of Medicis, at the court of Louis XIII. In 1620 she maiTied Anthony du Roure de Combalet, and became involved in the quarrels of her mother with the cardinal. That princess, notwithstanding the orders of Louis, withdrew her daughter from the court, and, on her return, made an attempt to carry her oft' in the public streets of Paris. The king, informed of AIG AIK this circumstance, declared that he would not have hesitated to march at tlie head of 50,000 men into Flanders, to restore her to liberty. The cardinal, on his part, an equal admirer of the generous cha- racter of his niece, was ambitious to see her elevated to higher rank ; and upon the death of her consort, spared no pains to unite her to the Comte de Soissons, gi-andson to the prince of Conde ; and failing in this, entered into negotiations to obtain for her the hand of the cardinal of Lorraine. Spite of every obstacle, the adventurous minister undertook to bring as her dowry the duchy of Bar into the house of LoiTaine ; but this project also fell to the gi-oimd. Still ardently attached to his niece, he purchased for her the duchy of Aiguillon ; and the manner in which she employed her wealth, and adorned her rank and fortune, showed how well the high opinion of the great statesman had been merited. She de- voted her influence and resourees only to the noblest purposes ; and which becom- ing extended after her uncle's death, she endowed hospitals, ransomed the cliristian slaves of Africa, and founded the Hotel Uieu at Quebec, of which she herself drew up the regulations. Her piety was equal to the extent of her benefactions ; and on her death, which enriched nu- merous charitable institutions, she was deservedly regi-etted, both for her virtues and her high talents, by people of every rank. Her funeral oration, pronoimced by the eloquent Flechier, was heard by an immense concourse, including persons of the highest rank, among whom her memory and example were not without their effect. AIGUILLON, ( Armand - Vignerod Duplessis-Richelieu,1720 — 1780,)nephew of the preceding, appeared young at the court of Louis XV. He owed to the favour of the court both his militaiy and civil appointments ; and in regard to the former, he was accused, though per- haps unjustly, when engaged with the British upon the shores of Brittany, of having left his post, and retired to the shelter of a neighbouring mill. " He is covered with flour, if not with glory," was sarcastically remarked ; and so indignant were the men of Brittany, that they peti- tioned to have him disgraced. He was also employed in several embassies and ministerial offices, biit with little credit ; and it woidd be useless to pm-sue the career of a man who appears to have owed his good fortune least of all to his own talents. 184 AIGUILLON, (Armand - Vignerod - Duplessis-Richelieu Due de,) son of the preceding, a peer of France, and com- mander of the light cavalry of the king's guard. He became involved in the in- trigues and violence of the revolutionary factions ; superseded general Custines in the army employed at the passes of Po- rentruy ; and being in his turn denounced, was compelled to seek an asylum in Ger- many. He died in exile in 1800. AIGUILLON, (Armand Louis de Vignerod-Duplessis, Due d',) born 1683, was the author of several works, which, by some writers, have been erroneously attributed to his son, 1. A most infamous collection of impious and licentious poems ; happily, only seven copies were printed. 2. Suite de la Nouvelle Cyropedie ; ou Reflexions de Cyinis sur ses Voyages; Amsterdam, 1728. He is stated to have had for his collaborateiu's in this under- taking, the princess of Conti, the Abbe Grecourt, and Father Vinot. In 1718 he maiTied Anne Charlotte de Cnissol de Florensac, a lady of Uterary taste, who published a variety of lighter pieces, and who is said to have retained to the last her good looks and vivacity, which earned her the name of la bonne ducheRse d'yiigiiillon though the Mare- chale de Mirepoix said " her smiles were as dangerous as the bite of the duke of Ayen." AIKIN, (John, M.D. 1747 — 1822,) bonr at Kebworth Harcourt. This well- known writer was the only son of Dr. J. Aikin, (for some years teacher of divinity in the dissenting academy atWaiTington in Lancashire,) and educated by him. He was destined for the medical profession ; and having attended in the class of Dr. John Hunter in 1770, he commenced business at Chester ; but after a short stay removed to Warrington. He almost im- mediately also commenced aiithor ; and three small essays, published successivel)', on pi-ofessional subjects, were so favour- ably received, that from this period his devotion to the press was fixed. His first work, not professional, was Essays on Song Writing (in 1772), which were sub- sequently re-formed and re-issued under the title of Vocal Poetry. In this same year he man-ied a cousin of his own, named Martha Jennings. A Specimen of the Medical Biography of Great Bri- tain, in 1775, was so highly approved, that he felt encouraged to prepare a volume of Biographical Memoirs of Me- dicine in Great Britain, from the revival of Literature to the time of Hervey, pub- A I K A I K lislied in 1780. He now went to Leyden, and took the degree of M.D. On his return he made his first trial as pliysician at Yarmouth, and there, with a slight in- terval, he continued to practice until 1792, when prudence dictated a removal to London. A large body of his supporters, zealous members of the Established Church, had taken umbrage at the part acted by him while the repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts was under discussion in Parliament. He wrote two pamphlets on the question. In this same year appeared his View of the Character and Public Services of the late John Howard. His intimacy with Howard, and the interest which he had taken in the projects of the philanthropist, enabled him to present a lively, and, with a grain of allowance for predilections, an accurate delineation of his hero. About the same time the Doctor and his sister commenced the Evenings at Home, which they completed in six small volumes, in June 1795. Not more than one-twelfth part is said to have been the lady's share. These little books are too well known to require any comment, and they have led the way to many others of a similar kind. The work is still deservedly popu- lar, and " has been translated into almost every European language." His next literary production was the Letters from a Father to a Son, on various Topics rela- tive to Literature and Science ; a work of reputation in its day. In 1796 he became literary editor of the Monthly Magazine on its first establishment, and continued so for ten yeai's. At the end of this time (in January, 1807) he started a new magazine, named the Athenaeum, which endured no longer than two and a half years. This periodical (as well as the Monthly, during Aikin's superintendence of it) was distinguished by some valuable contributions from gentlemen of con- siderable eminence, in the connexion of the editor, especially from Gilbert Wake- field. In the same year, 1796, he com- menced his General Biography, in which he was aided b/ Drs. Enfield and Mor- gan, by Mr. Nicholson, and others. This work extended to ten 4to. vols, and his own portion is said to have amounted to almost one-half. He was engaged upon it for nearly twenty years ; yet during those years he found time for various other publications, as editor, translator, and author. After an excursion of a few months to Dorking, for the benefit of his health, with so little success that on his return m Oct. 1798 he felt obliged to relinquish 185 his profession altogether, he settled at Stoke Newington, and there he resided until his death. In addition to the labours already referred to, he in 1811 undertook the editorship of Dodsley's Annual Register, and this was conducted four years in conjunction with the General Biography. In 1820, his last publication, the Select Works of the British Poets, with Biographical and Critical Prefaces, made its appearance ; and " the contents of this volume are so comprehensive, that few poems (he believes) are omitted, except such as are of secondary merit, or vm- suited to the perusal of youth." Ben Jonson stands first in the series (thirty- five in the whole), and Beattie the last. In 1817 a severe stroke of the palsy had deprived him of his faculties ; he survived, with a partial recovery, through more than five years, when, on Dec. 7th, 1822^ a second blow proved fatal. Dr. Aikin was by birth and education a dissenter ; and though the character of a candid as well as enlightened man may be freely awarded to him, yet in his bio- graphies there is a disposition to regard with too friendly an eye individuals of sentiments consentaneous to his own, and to raise them something above their due level. In his general writings, even those intended for young persons, he does not afi:ect to conceal a latitudinarian liberality of dissent. In Evenings at Home, a father instructs his son that " Religion is one of the things in which mankind were made to differ." He might as tndy have taught them that teeth were made to ache, — which, as Paley sensibly observes, they were not ; they were made to eat. His style of compo- sition possesses considerable fluency and animation, and, at times, even of ele- gance. He was altogether very ardent and persevering in the pursvut of literature and science, and a very useful and suc- cessful cultivator of them also. He is likewise represented, by those who best knew him, to have been a virtuous and amiable man. A memoir was published of his life and writings in 1823, from the pen of his daughter, Lucy Aikin. His principal works, besides those already enumerated, were — On the Ligature of the Arteries; 1770. On the External Use of Preparations of Lead. On Hos- pitals. Miscellaneous Pieces, in con- junction with Mrs. Barbauld; 1773. Translation of the Agricola and De Moribus of Tacitus ; 1774. Lewis's His- tory of the Materia Medica, 1784. Va- rious small books on Natural History. A IK A I L Various Poems, separately, of our En- glish Poets, Thomson, Green, Somerville, Pope, with appropriate prefaces. An edi- tion of Spenser. Translations of Select Eulogies fi-om D'Alembert, 1799 ; of Huet's Memoirs of Himself, 1802; of Zschokke's History of the Invasion of Switzerland, 1803. Lives of Selden and Usher; 1812. Annals of George III.; 1816. AIKMAN, (William, 1682—1731,) a Scotch painter of some eminence, chiefly in portrait-painting. In early life he v/as the friend of Allan Ramsay, and also was the means of introducing the poet Thom- son to Sir Robert Walpole, to Pope, and other literary characters. He tra- velled, for improvement in his art, to Italy, Turkey, and Smyrna, &c. On his return, he was persuaded by the duke of Argyll to come to London, where he re- sided till his death. He was a favourite portrait-painter with the fashionable peo- ple of his day. An unfinished picture of the Royal Family, painted by him for lord Burlington, is in the duke of Devonshire's possession. He appears to have been a man of cultivated mind, and of repute in his profession ; and Thom- son the poet wrote a well-known poem on his death. AILHAUD, (John,) a French sur- geon of Provence, who owed his celebrity to the virtues of the peculiar powder which bears his name. Its success ob- tained for him sufficient I'eputation to establish himself as a doctor at Aix. He took out a license, and opened places for the sale of his drug in almost every town throughout the country. He ac- quired an immense fortune ; and his son, who purchased a large estate, became a bai-on, and took a public office under the crown. This celebrated charlatan lived to the advanced age of 82, and died in 1786. AILLAUD, (Peter Toussaint, 1759— 1826,) a French ecclesiastic, and pro- fessor of rhetoric at Montauban, was an author of mediocre talent. It is enough to state, that he was fond of re-writing the woi-ks of others, and undertook a new Lutrin, and a new Heni'iade. AILLY, (Peter d',) a cardinal, desig- nated as the " eagle of the doctors of France, and the hamiuer of heretics," was born at Compeigne in 1350, of an obscure family, but raised himself by the force of his talents to the first dignities of the church. He distinguished him- self at the college of Navarre, and before tho age of 30 published treatises upon 186 philosophy, adopting the principles of the Nominalists, whose disputes with the Realists formed the favourite theme of the day. He was already a doctor in 1380, and four years afterwards grand master of the college of Navarre. Se- lected to plead at Avignon before pope Clement VII. the cause of the university of Paris against Jean de Monteson, he acquitted himself with such credit, that on his return he was made chancellor of the institution, almoner and confessor of Charles VI. Being sent by this mo- narch on a mission to the anti-pope Peter de Lune, on his return he prevailed upon the council to acknowledge Peter as the legitimate pope, by the title of Benedict XIII. Shortly afterwards he was appointed successively to the epi- scopal sees of Puy and Cambray ; and such was the eloquence he displayed be- fore the new pope, preaching on the sub- ject of the Trinity, that Benedict, in his grateful zeal, instituted for that alone the festival known by the same name. His next care was to extinguish the schism which prevailed in the Roman church ; and he brought about the convocation of a general council at Pisa, in 1409. At this he greatly distinguished himself by his wisdom and prudence, and two years subsequently was raised to the puq:)le by John XXIII. and sent into Germany in quality of legate. But it was by the part he acted in the council of Constance that this prelate rendered his name so cele- brated. He presided over its third session, and came to the decision that the retreat of John XXIII. and his cardinals could not affi?ct the authority of the council, and, both by his discourses and writings, la- boiued to prove the superiority of councils over the papacy, and the necessity of a reformation in the church, to commence with the head. Upon occasion of being appointed legate to Avignon by pope Martin V., he gave up his sees in 1411, and died at that city in 1420, as appears in the account of his obsequies by Jean le Robert, written at the time when they were celebrated, and in the acts of the chapter general of the Chartreux, held at the same period. He left his books and manuscripts to the college of Navarre, a list of which has been preserved by Montfaucon in his Bibliotheque Nou- velle des Manuscrits, and by Laimoi (in the Gersoniana of Dupin). His works consist of liis Traite de la Reforme de I'Eglise, published in the last edition of Qiuvres de Gerson ; in which he inveighs against the mendicant orders, the pomp A I L AIM of ecclesiastics, excommunications, and the multiplying of festivals. But, not- withstanding his zeal for reform, he main- tained the supremacy of the ecclesiastical power in the disposal of crowns, and was a heliever in judicial astrology, in his Concordantia Astronomi.-E cum Theologia et Concordantia Astronomige cum His- toria, (Vienna, 1490,) in which he con- siders the revolutions of empires and religion in conjunction with the planets, and supposes that the deluge, the advent of the Saviour, and the miracles, were all foretold by the aid of astronomy. His Treatises and Discourses were printed at Strashurgh, 1490 ; his Life of Pope Ce- lestin V. at Paris, 1539; and his Me- teores at Strashiu-gh, 1504, and Vienna, 1509. His Treatise on the Reform of the Church is to be found also in Brown's Fasciculus Rerum Expetendarum, &c. vol. i. AILMER. See Aylmer. AILRED, (or, as some writers spell the name, Ethelred, or Ealred,) of Rie- vaux, an English histf)i-ian, who flourished during the reigns of Stephen and Henry n. Leland suspects that he was born in Scotland. The date of his birth is as- certained to have been a.d. 1109, and from his childhood he was educated in Scotland, along with Henry, son of Da- vid, king of that country. He afterwards came into England, embraced a religious life, and became, first, abbot of Revesby, in Lincolnshire, and afterwards of the celebrated abbey of Rievaux. He is said to have died in 1166. Ailred was a vo- luminous writer, and many of his works are preserved in manuscript. Some of them are historical, as his Histories of the War of the Standard, under King Stephen, and of David, king of Scotland, — others biographical, as his Lives of Edward theConfessor, and of St. Margaret, queen of Scotland, — and many of them theological. His History of the War of the Standard, his Genealogy of the Kings of England (including the Life of David), the Life of Edward the Confessor, and the Story of the Nun of Watton, are printed in the Decern Scriptores, by Roger Twysden. His Life of St. Mar- garet was printed by Surius. Some of Ailred's theological pieces were printed at Douay in 1631, and were afterwards in- serted in the BibHotheca Cisterciensis, vol. V. and in the twenty-third volume of the BibHotheca Patrum. AIMAR RIVAULT, (Aimarius Ri- valius,) a learned advocate of Dauphiny, who practised in the reigns of Charles 1S7 Vn. and his next tw^ successors. He became professor in the university, and was selected as counsellor to the parlia- ment of Grenoble. His works were de- servedly held in high repute ; one of wliich, his Historia Jiu-is tJtriusque, was published atMayence,1533 andl539,8vo. His researches, however, do not appear to have been carried far enough, and although interesting as relates to the Law of the Twelve Tables, and the Roman Pandects, the works of Baldus, Grotius, and Decarenus are considered more per- fect, as well as moi*e extensive and useful. ALMAR VERNAL (Jacques,) a pea- sant of St. Veran in Dauphiny, was one of those common impostors who, by pre- tensions to the infallibility of the divin- ing rod, became celebrated for the use of its miracidous powers. Not only could he reach seci'et springs and metals, but bring delinquents of every degi-ee to justice by the directions of his wonderful rod, till he was at length detected -and exposed. See more on this curious sub- ject in the Life of P. de Brun, in the vo- lume of Thiers on Superstition, usually appended to Picart's Ceremon. Relig."; also For. Quart. Rev. iv. p. 562. AIMERI DE BELENVEL. See Belenvel. AIMERI DE BELMONT. See Bel- mont. AIMERIC MALEFAYDA, or of Mnlefayc, (d. 1187,) patriarch of Antioch in the twelfth century, was a native of St. Viance in the Limousin territory. He was distinguished in the crusade preached by Urban II., made dean and afterwards patriarch of Antioch. He endeavoured to reform the hermits of Mount Carmel, and, imiting them in one congregation, he gave them a rule; and his reform hav- ing been confinned by the pope (Alex- ander III.) in 1180 the Carmelites arose from it. His brother St. Berthold was the first general of the order. His works are — 1. De Institutione Primorum Mo- nachorum, &c. a translation of a spurious work attributed to John of Jerusalem, written to prove that Elias (Elijah) is the founder of the order of Carmelites : the same absurdities may be found in the Abbe Musson's Ordres Monastiques, &c. 2. Salachn's Siege of Jerusalem. 3. Epis- tola ad Hugonem Eterianum in Martene's Thesaurus, vol. i. AIMERIC DE PEGUILAIN, one of the most famous of the troubadours, or poets who Avrote in the langue d'oc. He was born at Toulouse, about the year 1 1 75. A IM A I M his father being a draper in that city. At an early age he fell in love with the wife of a citizen, and changed his father's trade for that of a poet. But the hus- band of the lady having discovered suf- ficient to excite his jealousy, a duel ensued, in which Aimeric wounded his antagonist on the head, and was in con- sequence obliged to fly from the place of his nativity. He found shelter with a brother poet in Catalonia, Guillaume de Bergedan, wlio, pleased with his talent, treated him generously, and introduced him to the court of Alphonso XI. king of Castile. Among the poems of Aimeric which are preserved, we have a tenson, or poetical contest, between him and Guillaume de Bergedan, in wliich the subject disputed is, " Whether it be better to be loved by a lady without loving her, or to love her without obtaining any re- turn," It was Aimeric who sustained the former position, and his opponent rallies him on the inconsistency between his words and his actions : — " Bar N'Aimeric, ja no us euidetz gabar; Que s'aniassetz tan cant aysi eus vanatz, Ko us foratz tan de Tholoza lunliatz." " Noble Aimeric, do not think to joke with us ; If you had made love in the way you talk of, You would not liave removed so far from Toulouse." After spending several years in the courts of Castile and Arragon, Aimeric left them to take up his residence in Italy, visiting Toulouse and his ancient mis- tress by the way. He spent the rest of his life in the courts of the various Italian princes, and outlived all his benefactors and friends ; having, at his death, in about 1255, when he must have been more than 80 years old, exercised the profession of poet during upwards of half a century. About fifty poems by Aimeric are pre- served in difterent manuscripts, of which a few have been printed by Raynouard. Many of these pieces are panegyrics on his difterent patrons. He is classed by Petrarca among the first poets of his age:— " Amerigo, Bernardo, Ugo, et Anselmo, Et mille Altri ne vidi, a cui la lingua Lancia e spada fu senipre, et scudo et elmo." Pelrarc. Trionfo d'Amore, capitolo iv. A long account of Aimeric and his writings will be found in tlie Histoire Litteraire de la France, torn, xviii. pp. 684—698. AIMERICH, (Matteo, 1715—1799,) a native of Bordil in Girona, entered into the society of Jesus, and was expelled when that order was banished from Spain. Repairing to Ferrara, he applied himself to study, and produced some works, 188 evincing at once his modesty and his erudition. Of these tlie most elaborate and the most esteemed is. Novum Lexi- con Historicum et Criticum Antiquse Lit- teraturffi deperditse vel latentis, aut Romanorum Eruditorum qui ea florue- runt ab Urbe Condita ad Honorii Augusti Interitum (Bassano, 1787) ; of this a spe- cimen had previously been published in 1 784. His other publications are Nomina et Acta Episcoporum Barcinonensium ; 8vo, Barcelona, 1760. Quinti Censorini de Vita et Morte Linguae Latinse Para- doxa Philologica, &c. (Ferrara, 1780) ; with a defence of this last woi'k under the title of Relatione Autentica dell'Ac- caduto in Pai-nasso (Ibid. 1782). AIMOIN OF FLEURY, one of the most celebrated of the early French his- torians. He was born of a noble family in the province of Perigord, at a place then called Ad-Francos, now Ville-Fran- che, between the i-ivers Isle and Doi'done. From his early childhood, he was edu- cated at Fleury-sui"-Loii-e, where he em- braced the monastic profession about A.D. 978. Under the tuition of the cele- brated Abbo, who taught publicly there, and was afterwards abbot of the place, he became very skilftd in all kinds of learn- ing, and obtained the warm friendship of his teacher, which lasted during their lives. Almoin was present, in 1004, when Abbo was slain. He is supposed to have died himself about four years later. His chief work is the History of the Franks, beginning with the origin of that nation, and intended to be continued to the reign of Pepin-le-Bref ; but either a part of it is lost, or its author never proceeded further than the sixteenth year of Clovis II. The continuation of this history was written by some monk of St. Germain-des-Pres. Aimoin's style is mo- dest, and his language much more cor- rect and elegant than that of most of his contemporaries ; but, as a historian, he is very inexact. His history has been fi'equently printed; but the best editions hitherto published are those given in the collections of Duchesne and Dom Bou- quet. Aimoin's veneration for St. Benoit, the patron saint of his monastery, is ex- hibited in various works on his life and miracles. His life of his friend and in- structor Abbo is full of curious details. He is also said to have written a history of the abbey, or rather of the abbots, of Fleiu'v, wliich is now lost. AliVION DE VARENNES, a French poet of the early part of the thirteenth cen- tury. His name is spelt variously, Aymar, A I M A IN Aimes, Aimons, &c. He was the autlioi* of the Roman de Florimont, or of Philip of Macedon, of which thei'e are several copies among the manuscripts in the Bih- liotheque du Roi at Paris, and one in the British Museum. He tells us in the poem, that he composed it at ChatiUon ; but the different manuscripts vary as to the date, though it cannot have been composed earlier than the thirteenth centin-y, as its author mentions the Roman d'Alexander composed at the beginning of that same centiu-y. " Seignor, je sa assez de fi Que d'Alixandre avez o'i: Mais ne savez encora pas Dont fu sa m^re Olimpias ; Del roi Filipont ne savez. Qui fu son pere, et dont fu nez." AINDJY, (Soliman,) grand vizier, born a Christian in Bosnia, i-ose by rapid steps till he became seraskier in 1685, and overthrew the Poles, led by the grand-general Jablownowski. By his skill and prudence he counteracted all the plans of his rivals ; was made grand vizier, but failing in his campaigns against the Christians, his troops marched to Constantinople (whither he had fled from them in consequence of a mutiny), and they demanded his head from Ma- liomet IV., who, after some delay, was obliged to yield, and thus Aindjy pe- rished. AINSWORTH, (Henry, d. 1622,) a nonconformist divine of the sixteenth century, the date and place of whose birth are unknown ; joined the Brownists in 1590, and shared in their persecutions. He was an excellent Hebrew scholar, wrote some esteemed commentaries on the Scriptures, and supported the opi- nions he had embraced with singular ability. He was at length compelled to fly to Holland, the asylum of so many of the nonconformists during the reign of Elizabeth. At Amsterdam he assisted Mr. Johnson in raising a church, of which he became the minister ; and also in conjunction with him, in 1602, he published A Confession of Faith of the People called Brownists. A schism, however, having sprung up in their new church, dissensions ran so high that Johnson excommunicated his own father and brother ; and both refused to listen to the mediation offered by the presby- tery of the city which afforded them a refuge ; half the congregation joined Ainsworth, and excommunicated John- son, whose party retorted in the same spirit upon the minister. It became im- 189 possible for both to continue in the same city, and Johnson with his congregation repaired to Embden, where he soon after- wards died. This secession did not wholly remove the cause of strife, and Mr. Ainsworth, resigning his ministry, retired into Ire- land, till at length the violence of party having had time to exhaust itself, he returned to Amsterdam, and continued with his old congregation till the close of his life. His death was not without suspicion of violence : having accidentally found a diamond of great value, he adver- tised it, and its owner, a Jew, offered him any gratuity he might desire. Though poor, Ainsworth only asked that he would obtain for him a conference with some of his rabbis, upon the prophecies of the Old Testament relating to the Messiah ; this the Jew promised, but not having sufficient inffuence, it was thought that, to save his own reputation, he caused the christian preacher to be poisoned. His Annotations on the Psalms were printed in 1612, 4to ; on the Pentateuch, 2 vols. 4to. 1621 ; and again in 1627 (foUo) and 1639. Among his Controversial Treatises is A Comiter-Poison against Bernard and Crashaw ; 1608 (4to.) and 1612. Bishop Hall answered this ti'act. He was also the author of several other works, all of them of a religious and controver- sial character. One of them was an Animadversion on Mr. Richard Clifton's Advertisement, &c. which related to the scliism in the Amsterdam congre- gation. AINSWORTH, (Robert,) author of the well-known compendious Dictionary of the Latin Tongue, was born at Wood- yale, near Manchester, in Sept. 1660. After he had finished his own education, he commenced schoolmaster at Bolton : hence he removed to London ; and at Bethnal Green, Hackney, and other suburban villages, continued to keep a school, initil he was fortunate enough to realize a competency, some years too before his death. In 1736, after about twenty years' labour, he published his gi-eat work, with a dedication to Dr. Mead, and a preface explaining his reasons for undertaking it. Improved editions by Patrick, Ward, Young, and Morell have successively appeared ; Ward and Young's (1752) in folio, the others in 4to. Dr. Carey's (1816) is the last, and esteemed the best. There are also abridgments by Young and MoreU. This dictionary was undoubtedly a great im- provement upon all that had preceded it A I N AIT in England : that of Dr. Adam was a fur- ther advance ; but a good school diction- ary is still wanted, and the works of Fac- ciolati and Scheller, now so accessible to the English scholar through the transla- tions of Bailey and Riddle, present abun- dant assistance towards the composition of such a book. Ainsworth was author of A Short Treatise on Grammar, and some smaller pieces. He is said to have been a hunter after old coins and other curiosities. He died on the 4th April, 1743, at the age of 77. He was buried at Poplar, and an inscription in Latin verse, written by himself, was placed over his remains and those of his wife. AIOUB-BEN-CHADY, (Nedjm- Eddyn, d. 1173,) father of Saladin, and a curd of the famous tribe of Roudyah, be- came chief of the Aioubites of Egypt. He was made governor of Balbec, where he was besieged and compelled to suiTender by Atabek Atsec, prince of Damascus. He was pi'esented by the conqueror with some territory, where he continued till his son, the great Saladin, having be- come vizier of the khalif Adhed, invited him to his court. Aioub made his entry into Cairo in 565 h. (1169), and Avas re- ceived by his son with marks of respect and honour ; Avhile to honour that son the more, the khalif himself went forth to greet him. Seldom has history re- counted more generous traits in the cha- racters of conquerors. Saladin placed his dignities at his father's disposal, who, while he declined to accept them, continued near his son, and spent his days in tran- quillity. Upon his death he was mourned and honoured by his noble son, who placed his tomb in the imperial palace, whence it was afterwards removed to Medina. (Biog. Univ.) AIRAULT. See Ayrault. AIRAY, (Christopher, 1601—1670,) born at Clifton in Westmoreland, was admitted a student in Queen's college, Oxford, in 1621, where he was elected a fellow, and proceeded B.D. in 1642. He wrote a work upon Logic, for the be- nefit of students, besides other small pieces, the titles of which Wood has not recovered. He subsequently became vicar of Milford in Hampshire, where he remained till his death. AIRAY, (Henry, 1559—1616,) pro- vost of Queen's college, Oxford, was born in Westmoreland in 1559, educated under Bernard Gilpin, known as the northern apostle, and by him sent to St. Edmund's hall in 1579. He was subsequently 190 chosen fellow of Queen's, whither he soon removed. He entered into holy orders ; took the degree of B. D. ; was elected provost, and in 1606 vice-chan- cellor ; and produced several able works upon subjects of divinity. He wrote the following — 1. Lectures upon the whole Ejjistle of St. Paid to the Philippians ; London, 1618, 4to, 2. The Just and Necessary Apology touching his Suit in Law, for the Rector of Charlton on Ot- more in Oxfordshire ; London, 1621, 8vo. 3. A Treatise against Bowing at the Name of Jesus. Airay was always strongly attached to the Puritan party, as the following quotation from Heylyn's Life of Laud will show. " In 1606, he was questioned by Dr. Airay, being vice- chancellor for that year, for a sermon preached in St. Marie's church on the 26th of October, as containing in it sun- dry scandalous and popish passages ; the good man taking all things to be matter of popery which were not held forth unto him in Calvin's Institutes, conceiving that there was as much idolatry in bowing at the name of Jesus, as in worshipping the brazen serpent," &c. (Heylyn's Laud, p. 54.) Some lands lying in Garsington, near Oxford, were bequeathed by hhn to Queen's college. AlSSfi, (Mdlle. 1693—1731,) a fair Circassian, bought at four years of age by count de Ferriol, French ambassador to Constantinople, carried to France, and educated by his sister-in-law. She is known by her unhappy life, in which she is said to have become the mistress of the ambassador. She subsequently lived in adultery with the chevalier D'Aidy. She bore a daughter to him in England ; and when Lady Bolingbroke (the niece of Madame de Maintenon) had placed this daughter (Miss Black) in a convent, the mother began to repent of her evil life. She did more — she quitted it, and she devoted herself to religious duties and to charity for the rest of her days. She showed many traits of gene- rosity even in her earlier life, especially in giving up to the sister of count Ferriol the property bequeathed to her ; and, indeed, there appear to have been qua- lities in her nature, which show what, with better principles, she might have become. Her letters have often been pub- lished — first, 1 787, with notes by Voltaire ; and afterwards in 1806, 3 vols. 12mo : they contain many anecdotes of remark- able pei-sons of that day. (Biog. Univ.) AITKEN, (Robert, 1734—1802,) a printer of Philadelphia, supposed to be A I T A K A the author of An Inquiry into the Prin- ciples of a Commercial System for tlie United States ; 1787. (Allen's Diet.) AITON, (William, 1731 — 1793,) a native of Lanarkshire. He was indebted to his own intelligence, good conduct, and exertions, for his success in life. He began his career as a simple labourer ; and in 1754 wandered for employment to the southern parts of the kingdom. In the following year he obtained the notice of ilr. Miller, author of the Gar- dener's Dictionary, then superintendent of the Botanical Garden at Chelsea. He was afterwards recommended to the prin- cess dowager of Wales, and in 1 7.59 he was appointed to the superintendence of the garden at Kew, which aflbrded ample display for his peculiar talents. The improvements he introduced were most valuable, and were conducted on princi- ples which are still in use. So gi'eat was his professional knowledge, in addition to his experience and practical skill, that he ranked among the first botanists of his time ; and in 1764 he contracted with Sir Joseph Banks a friendship which ended only with life. In 1783 he was advanced to the more lucrative ofHce of conducting both the pleasure and kitchen gardens at Kew, while he was permitted to retain his former post. In 1789 he published an ample catalogue of the plants at Kew, with the title of Hortus Kewensis, 3 vols. 8vo : it con- tained a full account of the foreign plants which had been introduced into tlie English gardens at different times. A second edition was published by his son, Wm. Townsend Alton, in 1810. He was succeeded by his eldest son in his offices. AITZEMA, (Foppe Van,) a gentle- man of Friedland, and resident of the States-General at Hamburgh, was em- ployed in several missions in Germany, and in 1636 to engage the emperor to preserve the neutrality. He was com- missioner also from Holland and Bohe- mia at the imperial court ; but unable to counteract the influence of France and Spain, he was compelled to return to the Hague without success. He was sus- pected, from the favours bestowed upon him by the emperor, of having favoured the interests of Vienna rather than of his adopted country, and was summoned to appear before a court ,of inquiiy. He was, however, honourably acquitted, and subsequently engaged to attend the diet in Lower Saxony, as well as on a secret mission to the chancellor of Sweden, then at Magdeburg. But fresh accusations hav- 191 ing been brought against him by the prince of Orange, he fled to Prague, and subse- quently sought an asylum in the impe- rial court, where he died soon after his arrival. Aitzema published in 1607 a collection of Latin poems at Helmstadt, and also Dissei-tations sur le Droit Civil, reprinted by Meerman in his Thesaurus Novus Juris Civ. et Eccles. AITZEMA, (Leo d', 1600—1669,) nephew of the preceding, and bom at Doccum. He distinguished himself by his literary attainments, no less than by his success in political life. At the age of 16 years he had already published Iris Poemata Juvenilia ; and under the aus- pices of his uncle. Resident for the States- General at Hamburgh, was soon engaged in more serious studies, and in a short time was appointed counsellor of the Hanse towns, and their Resident at the Hague. He came twice into England upon public aifairs, and obtained soon afterwards a high reputation both as a writer and a diplomatist. He produced a history of the United Provinces, entitled Zaken van Staat en Oorlog, which met with a favourable reception, and went through two large editions. It consisted of 16 vols. 4to, 1657 — 1671, and included the period between 1621 and 1G68. The second edition is in 7 vols, folio, 1669 — 1671, with an account of the peace of Munster, and a treatise entitled the Lion Restored, or an account of Dutch affairs in 1650 and 1651. His intimate ac- quaintance with men in office gave him peculiar advantages, of which he is said to have sometimes availed himself in a manner not very delicate or ingenuous. He was reproached by the Dutch with divulging their secret coiTCspondence, especially with England, for a proof of which Wagena-ir the historian refers to Thurloe's State Papers (Vauderslanche Historic, vol. xiii. p. 435) ; and Wicque- fort speaks slightingly of the original part of his great work, in which opinion Bayle says he cannot agree with him. It has, however, thrown much light upon the history of those times ; and fi-om it the Histoire des Provinces Unies, 8 vols. 4to, Paris, 1757 — 1771, was principally compiled. Aitzema died in 1669 at the Hague, where he usually resided. AKAKIA, (Mai'tin,) professor of me- dicine in the university of Paris, was a native of Chalons, and according to the custom changed his name from Sans- Malice, or Harmless, to that of Akakia, a Greek word of the same import. He translated Galen, De Ratione Curandi ; A K A AK B Ars Medica, quae est Ars Parva ; Con- silia Medica ; and 2 vols, on Female Diseases. He enjoyed a high reputa- tion ; was physician to Francis I. and one of the deputies from the tmiversity to the council of Trent in 1545. He died in 1551. AKAKIA, (Martin,) son of the pre- ceding, received his diploma at Paris in 1570 ; was appointed professor of surgery in the royal college, and second physician to Henry III. He has been supposed by some the author of the Treatise upon the Diseases of Women, usually attri- buted to his father. The same family produced several other members distinguished in the me- dical profession, one of whom died of disappointment at having been suspended from its exercise for a period of six months, on accoimt of holding a consul- tation with foreign doctors, contrary to the tenor of his oath. AKBAR, son of Aureng-Zebe. See Aueeng-Zebe. AKBAR PADSHAH, (Jelal-ed-din Mahmud, 1543 — 1604,) one of the great- est of the emperors of Hindoostan, com- monly but improperly called the Great Moguls. He was the son of the emperor Himia3ain, and descended through Baber from Timurleuk or Tamerlane. The emperor Humayun, deprived of his throne and exiled from his kingdom, was a helpless, hopeless wanderer in Persia when the young prince was born. While yet an infant, Akbar was seized by one of his uncles as a hostage, but was, after some time, restored to his father, who had become a pensioner on the bounty of Shah Tamasp, king of Persia. Under the uncei-tain protection of this capricious tyrant, who sometimes loaded them with favours, and sometimes threatened them with death unless they abandoned the Soonnee creed and embraced the Shceah doctrines, Humayun and his son re- mained for ten or eleven years, when new revolutions in India and Afghanistan opened to the former an opportunity for the recovery of his throne. In the de- cisive battle which delivered the empire of Delhi from the Afghan usui-pers, Akbar, tliough only in the 13th year of his age, displayed so nmch courage and conduct, that his father, immediately after his restoration, entrusted him with the command of the forces sent to com- plete the reduction of the Pimjab. The emperor Humayun did not long retain his recovered crown. Walking one eveiihig on the terrace of the library If. 2 at Dellii, he sat down to enjoy the fresh air ; after which, while in the act of de- scending the steps to go below, he heard the voice of the muezzin from the minaret of the royal mosque, announcing the hour of prayer. Like every good Mussulman, he stopped still to repeat the creed of Islam, leaning on a staff which he held in his hand : the staff slipped on the marble slabs, and the king fell headlong over on the pavement below ; he was borne senseless to his apartment, and died within three days. Intelligence of the sad event was sent to the army in the Punjab ; they assem- bled, and placed Akbar on the tnvsmtd, A.D. 1556, when he was only 13 solar years and 9 months old. Notwithstanding his extreme youth, Akbar began his reign by acts of wisdom and justice, very un- usiial among oi'iental sovereigns. He forbade the usual presents to be ex- acted from the nobles and governors of provinces, and he chose as his pi'ime minister his former tutor Beiram Khan, to whom he gave the tender name of Baba, or father. The Patans or Afghans no sooner heard of Humayiin's death, than they levied immense forces, cap- tured Agza and Delhi, and at lengtli drove the imperial forces across the Sutlej. Akbar concentrated his followers at Lahore, but they were so disheartened that the leading chiefs proposed to aban- don India and found a new empire in Cabul. From this fatal resolution they were dissuaded by Beiram Khan, and induced to hazard a decisive engage- ment. The armies met at Paniput, and the battle was fiercely contested until Hemoo, the leader of the Afghans, was shot through the eye with an arrow, and sunk down in his howdah from extreme agony : his immediate followers, believing him mortally v/ounded, fled ; and though Hemoo drew the arrow, and with it the eye out of the socket, which he wrapped in a handkerchief, and attempted to rail} his troops, all his eflbrts were vain. At length the driver of his elephant trea- cherously brought him into the hostile lines ; Hemoo was dragged from his howdah, and instantly beheaded. The Patans never recovered their defeat at Paniput, and the provinces which had revolted in hopes of their protection were successively reduced to obedience. Beiram Khan having tasted the sweets of power, was unwilling to resign the regency ; and he laid a plot with the queen dowager to seize and confine Ak- bar, who had given some hints of his AKB A KB anxiety to take the direction of affairs into his own hands. Tiie plot was dis- covered; and Bc-iram Khan, escaping from court, raised the standard of revolt. His rebellion was unsuccessful ; he was soon forced to surrender at discretion ; but Akbar, remembering his former ser- vices, spared his life on condition of his undertaking the pilgrimage to Mecca. The emperor now reigned without a director : he summoned to his aid the most able men of the country, without any regard to their creed or race ; but while he listened to the advice of all, he delegated his authority to none. During the preceding reign, the obedience of the provinces had been merely nominal : Akbar's vigorous exertions to make his sovereignty a reality, provoked revolts in Malwah, Guzerat and Bengal ; though the insurgents were vigorously supported by the Afghans on one side and the in- dependent Hindoos on the other, they were all successively subdued, and Akbar established undisputed sway over the entire of India Proper, from the Hima- layan mountains to the Deccan. The power and splendour of the Delhi empire became celebrated throughout the east, and not without reason, for Ak- bar's skill in consolidating and tranquil- lizing the dominions he had gained was even more conspicuous than his skill and courage in conquest : imlike the other Mohammedan rulers of India, he made no distinction between the Hindoos and the followers of Islam ; he promoted several Brahmins to high offices at his court, enrolled a corps of Rajpoots in his service, and received with kindness the Parsees who fled from the persecu- tion of his more bigoted neighbours. Though so continually occupied by wars, he devoted a large share of his attention to religious subjects ; and as his reason was shocked by some parts of the Mo- hammedan system, he endeavoured by all the means in his power to procure in- formation respecting other creeds. Seve- ral Brahminical treatises were translated from Sanscrit into Persian at his expense, and large sums were spent in collecting from among the Parsees, fragments of the sacred books ascribed to Zoroaster. But Christianity particularly engaged the attention of the emperor ; he wrote a letter to the king of Portugal, requesting a translation of the Gospels into Persian, and the aid of missionaries to explain their meaning. •Geronimo Xavier, a relation to the famous St. Francis Xavier, imdertook to VOL. I. 193 gratify the emperor ; he translated the Gospels into Persian, but, probably in the hope of accommodating them to eastern taste, he mixed some of the most childish legends of the Romish church with their simple truths, and the New Testament thus corrupted was not less repulsive to Akbar than the Koran had been. Dis- appointed in his endeavours to find a re- ligion by which he could be satisfied, Akbar resolved to form one for himself, and with this view he held solemn con- versations at his palace, in which the most enlightened and learned men of every sect and race that could be assem- bled, discussed in the emperor's presence the great mysteries of time and eternity. The residts of these discussions are col- lected in that extraordinary work, the Dalustan, which was published after Akbar's death, but was probably compiled under his direction. So far as Akbar's proposed religion received a definite form, it appears to have consisted in a simple acknowledgment of the Divine Unity and the Attributes, and a rejection of all other positive dogmas. At one time he intended to claim the rank of an inspired prophet, but the remonstrances of his minister, Abu'1-Fazl, induced him to abandon this design. The plan of forming a mixed religion from Hindooism and Mohammedanism, was a favourite specidation with many of the philoso- phers of the Delhi empire : about a cen- tury after Akbar's death, it was revived by Nanee, the founder of the Sikhs, and carried into effect during the long series of civil wars which followed the death of Aurungzebe. Without directly reckon- ing Akbar among their saints, the Sikhs hold his name in the highest reverence, and pay great respect to his tomb. Ak- bar was an accomplished, but not a very profound scholar ; he wrote a brief his- tory of his own career, and several poems of some merit, especially translations of the Indian fables. His letters are more remarkable for their straightforward common sense than for any beauty of composition : that which he addressed to the king of Portugal is a very interesting and chai'acteristic document ; it has been translated and published in Mr. Eraser's Life of Nadir Shah. But Akbar's highest fame arises from the internal administration of his king- dom. The Ayiri Akberi (mirror of Ak- bar) composed by his vizier, Abu'1-Fazl, contains a very minute account of the multifarious reforms introduced by the emperor into every department of the O AK B AKB government. He constructed immense lines of road to connect the different pro^^nces, and established posts through- out his dominions, having two horses and a set of footmen stationed at every ten miles. His frontiers, and the pro- vinces most likely to be disturbed by marauders, were secured by a series of fortresses, so judicioiisly placed that they are still admired by European engineers ; he instituted a system of police far more complete in its arrangements and details than any which has since existed in India ; and the statistical survey of the extent, popidation, wealth and resomxes of his empire, made imder his own superintendence, is still regarded as the best account of the provinces that has yet existed. No monarch of the east carried the system of training and em- ploying pigeons as coui'iers to the same extent as Akbar, but the result of his experiments appears to have been very unsatisfactory, and towards the close of his reign the pigeon establishment began to be gradually neglected. The happiness of Akbar would have been complete but for his troubles in domestic life. For a long time he had no children ; and when he was at length gratified with three sons, their mis- conduct proved the bane of his existence. Selim, the eldest, was a bigot to the most orthodox of the orthodox Moham- medan sects, and made no scruple to stigmatize his father as a heretic and infidel : Morad was a debauchee ; he sunk into premature decrepitude from licentious indulgence, and died miserably " of old age in his youth" as the Persian historian declares : Daniel was a drunk- ard, and died of apoplexy produced l)y intemperance. The last was Akbar's favourite child, and had he lived would probably have been his adopted heir, for Selira had forfeited his right by repeated rebellions. Grief for his loss brought Akbar to the grave in the 50th year of his reign and 64th of his age, a. h. 1014, A.D.I 60.5. The particulars of Akbar's death are recorded in the memoirs of his son Selim, better known by the name of Jehangueir ; but they are too long to be extracted, and we refer the curious to the trans- lation of the emperor Jehangueir's auto- biograph}', published by the Oriental Translation Committee. We need only add, that most of Akbar's improvements perished with him : Selim or Jehangueir was at once a profligate and a bigot ; and his chief aim during his reign was to undo 194 all his father had done, — to destroy all whom his father had loved, and to restore all that his father had overthrown. AKBEH BEN NAFY, Arab governor of Africa under the khalif Moawyah, was one of those celebrated followers of the Prophet, whose rapid conquests over the tribes and nations of the East pre- pared the way for those of the West. He it was who, after routing the Berbers, and all the most formidable generals opposed to him, at length came to the ocean, — when, with the soul of a true Mussulman, drawing his sword, he spurred into the water, exclaiming, " Mighty God ! were it not for these thy waters, I would penetrate to the far- thest regions of the west ; I would pro- claim the unity of thy holy name upon my Avay ; I woidd exterminate every other people who adored other god but thee." He was assassinated a.h 63. (a. D. 682), after having reduced Africa under the Arabs, and directed their path towards Spain. AKBEH BEN HEJADI, or much more correctly, Ocha hen Alhegag, (736 — 741,) Arabian viceroy of Spain, suc- ceeded the emir Abdelmelic ben Cotan. He had acquired considerable fame in the wars of Mauritania, and hopes were entertained that he would be able to fepair the disasters recently experienced in Gaul by the Moslem arms. His im- partial, severe justice towards the great Avas sure to be hailed by the poor, who are willing enough to be governed by law when they perceive the same law obligatory on those above them. The merit of Ocba in this respect was the more remarkable when contrasted with the laxity of his predecessors. To intro- duce the most important reforms into the administration, to extirpate bands of robbers, to found mosques and schools, were his constant objects. How well he succeeded may be inferred fi'om the hatred which the tjTannical ivalis, or local governors, bore towards the man who did notscreen even them — whorendered them as much amenable to the jurisprudence of the Koran as the meanest disciple of the Prophet. To sustain the declining empire of the Mohammedans in the south of France, this able and virtuous man was constrained to pass the Pyve- nees ; but he Avas speedily recalled to quell an insurrection of the African Ber- bers. During his absence in Mam-i- tania, which he expected would be very brief, he appointed no deputy; but on all the walls he incxilcated the necessity AKE A KE of justice, of harmony, of adhering to the best precepts of the Koi"an. That absence, however, was prolonged to three years ; and so little effect had his admo- nitions on the local governors, that they reverted to more than their former ty- ranny. Great was his consternation to learn that his predecessor only, Abdel- melic ben Cotan, had remained free from the general contagion. Exhausted by his efforts, and despairing of a better re- sult, he obtained his own dismission and the restoration of Abdelmelic. (Conde. Historia de los Arabes in Espaiia. Dun- ham, History of Spain, vol. i.) AKENSIDE, (Mark, M.D. F.R.S., 1721 — 1769). This distinguished poet and physician entered as a pupil at Edin- burgh when in his nineteenth year, at first with the intention of becoming a dissenting preacher, but he soon turned his thoughts to medicine, which he stvi- died diligently for two years. He did not graduate at Edinburgh, but at Ley- den, where he took his degree of M.D. May 16, 1744, and submitted a thesis, De Ortu et Incremento Foetus Humani, which he printed and inscribed to Dr. Mead. Two years previously to this he styles himself, in a letter to Mr. Dyson, his great friend and patron through life, " Sui-geon in Newcastle-upon-Tyne." He commenced practice as a physician at Northampton, in June 1744, but he re- sided there only a year and a half, for Dr. Stonehouse absorbed all the practice of that city and the neighbourhood. Having settled in London, the Royal College of Physicians, on June 20, 1751, associated him as a licentiate ; and April 8, 17.54, he was elected a Fellow of the College, having in 1753 been admitted by mandamus to a doctor's degree at Cambridge. His practice as a physician was never extensive, but it was not in- signficant. Mr. Dyson enabled him to support all the necessary expenses at- tending equipage, &c., by assigning to him an annual income of 300/. In 1759, he was chosen assistant physician to St. Tliomas's hospital, of which he almost immediately became one of the chief physicians, and was made one of the physicians to the Queen. He was selected by the College of Physicians to deliver the Gulstonian lectui'es, in 1755, and the Croonian in 1756. He also pronounced the Harveian Oration in 1759, printed it, and dedicated it to the president, Dr. Reeve. According to the annals of the college, he was thanked by the college in 1766, for liis trouble in preparing the 195 college edition of the works of Harvey for the press, and for \vriting the preface which was attached to it, accompanying a Life of Harvey composed by Dr. Law- rence. These appointments and engage- ments must have arisen from the sense entertained by the college and the public of his professional merits, and the ac- knowledged elegance and excellence of his literaiy productions. The personal accounts of Akenside are few and unim- portant. Mr. Pettigi-ew has placed upon record a painful statement from a MS. left by Dr. Lettsom, who was a pupil at St. Thomas's hospital during the time Akenside was one of its physicians. Dr. Lettsom describes Akenside as " superci- lious and unfeeling." He says that "if the poor affrighted patients did not retm'n a direct answer to his queries, he would often instantly discharge them from the hospital; that he evinced a particular dis- gust to females, and generally treated them with harshness. One leg of Akenside was considerably shorter than the other, which obUged him to wear a false heel. He had a pale, strumous countenance, but was always very neat and even ele- gant in his dress. He wore a large white wig, and carried a long sword." Lettsom never knew him to spit, nor woidd he suffer any pupil to spit in his presence. One of them once accidentally did so, yet standing at some distance behind him ; the doctor instantly spun round on his artificial heel, and hastily demanded who was the person that spit in his face. Sometimes he would order some of the patients, on his visiting days, to precede him with brooms, to clear the way, and prevent the patients from too nearly ap- proaching liim. On one of these occa- sions, Richard Chester, a quaker, one of the governors of the hospital, up- braided him for his cniel behaviour : "Know," said he, "thou art a servant of this charity." On one occasion his anger was excited to a very high pitch, by the answer which Mr. Baker, the sur- geon, gave to a question the doctor put to him respecting one of his sons, who was subject to epilepsy, which had some- what impaired his understanding. " To what study do you purpose to place him?" said Akenside to Baker. "I find," re- plied Baker, " he is not capable of mak- ing a surgeon, so I have sent him to Edinburgh, to make a physician of him." Akenside turned round from Baker with impetuosity, and would not speak to him for a considerable time afterwards. Dr. Lettsom's statement is borne out in a O 2 A K E AKE measure by the testimony of Mr. Mey- rick, a surgeon and apothecary wlio fre- quently called in Akenside, with whom he was in habits of intimacy. " We were not very much alike, either," says Mr. M. " for he was stiff and set ; and I, all life and spirits. He often frowned upon me in a sick room. He could not bear to see any one smile in the presence of an invalid, and I think he lost a good deal of business by the solemn sententiousness of his air and manner. I wanted to cheer patients up." Akenside was, how- ever, in favour -with the pupils, as he would occasionally condescend to explain a case of disease, and his observations were always sagacious. The subject selected by Akenside for the Gulstonian Lectiu-es, was the Functions of the Lym- phatic or Absorbent System, the real na- tiu'e of which was not in his time clearly ascertained. By Galen and other ancient authorities, the IjTnphatics were regarded as forming a part of the venous system : hence arose the opinions concerning venous absoi-ption, a doctrine espoused by many distinguished physiologists, men indeed no less celebrated than Rviysch, Boerhaave, Meckel, Swammerdam, and Haller. Dr. William Hunter, and Dr. Monro, (secundus,) embraced a contrary opinion, denied venous absorption alto- gether, and assigned to the lymphatics the sole possession of that pecidiar office. A conti'oversy sprung up between Hun- ter and Monro, as to priority in promul- gating this view of the subject. Their opinions were not put before the public until 1757 ; whereas it really appears that Akenside had taken the same view in the Gulstonian lectures, delivered at the Royal College of Physicians, on May 28, 29, and 30, 1755, as stated in the records of the college. Akenside did not print his lectiu'es, so that his claim could be faii-ly and indis- putably maintained ; but it is not vmrea- sonable to suppose that the dispute which ran very high between Hunter and Monro, occasioned him to lay before the Royal Society a paper which was read Nov. 10, 1757, containing extracts from his lectures. These were printed in the Philosophical Transactions,(vol.l. p. 322,) and they entitle him to claim the doc- trine. In these extracts, however, he makes no allusion to the pretensions of others, but calmly states his objections to the doctrine of Boerhaave and the me- chanical philosophers, and contends for the independency of the lymphatic sys- tem. Dr. Monro was not slow to notice 196 these in a Postscript to his Observations Anatomical and Philosophical; which was replied to by Akenside in a pamphlet, quoted from by the Rev. Mr. Dyce, and published in 1758. His principal medi- cal work, De Dysenteria Commentarius, was first published in 1764, and its lati- nity has always been deservedly admired. His history of dysentery, and the means suggested for its relief, are entitled to commendation. Pathology has made great advances since the time of Aken- side, and the distinction between inflam- mation of the serous, muscular, and mucous textures, are now better under- stood. The treatment of dysentery de- pends upon the condition of those struc- tures, and Akenside's book is therefore no longer sought after but as a specimen of elegant Latin composition. He was also (besides some occasional papers) the author of some observations on putrid erysipelas, which were intended to have been printed in the second volume of the Transactions of the College of Physicians. To prepare them for the press, the paper had been sent to him from the college, to which they were never returned, as his death unexpectedly occuiTed from an attack of putrid sore throat. The above details belong to the life of Akenside as a physician, but he is chiefly known as the author of The Pleasures of Imagination, and some other poems. Of his minor poems there is little to be said. Dr. Johnson has remarked of his odes, that the sentiments commonly want foi-cc, nature, or novelty ; and pointed out their other defects. He speaks more favoui- ably of the Pleasures of Imagination. Of its plan he says : " The parts seem artificially disposed, with sufficient co- herence, so as that they cannot change their places without injury to the design." To the writer of this notice, that design appears so indefinite, as to leave the reader in some doubt what it really was, nor do the various parts seem to be ar- ranged round any leading view. This remark applies to the poem as at first published; it is unfair to make such an objection to the poem in its second form, as that was never finished. It is rather an eulogy on mental pleasures than on pleasures of the imagination in particular. The beginning and the end (the eulogy on nature as the expression of what God loves) are the most agree- able parts of it — at least they are the simplest. The vision of Hamaodius, in the second book, is as heavy as allegory can make it, although, perhaps, not so AK E AK I dull as the episode of Solon, in the third book of the improved poem. Indeed, however extraordinary the poem may appear, as the work of a young man of twenty-three, it has little to make it generally and permanently acceptable. Its subject precludes its general popu- larity with ordinary people ; and with the higher class of minds, the deficiency caused by confining its contemplations to this woi-ld alone, will always leave an unsatisfactory impression. It is written in the conventional language of the clas- sical school, and belongs to the didactic and descriptive class of poems. It will always maintain a certain reputation, and it will always be more praised than read. AKERBLAD, (John David,) a Swed- ish philologist, born 1760 ; became attache of the embassy to Constantinople, of which he was subsequently made secre- tary. He visited Palestine and Troy ; went to Gottingen about the year 1800, and afterwards occupied the post of charge d'affaires at Paris. His oriental studies led him to examine the National Library, where he discovered some Coptic MSS. the characters of which were un- known, but of which he found the key, sent to M. Silvestre de Sacy, and pub- lished in the Magasin Encyclopedique. Dissatisfied with some political aiTange- ments, he next went to establish himself at Rome, where he drew the attention of the duchess of Devonshire and other patrons of literature and the arts, who enabled him to pursue his favourite studies without interruption. But he died suddenly at Rome in 1819, at the age of 60, and his remains were interred near the Pyramid of Cestius. The works of Akerblad attest his varied and exten- sive aquirements, more particularly his profound knowledge of the oriental lan- guages, many of which he coidd speak with perfect ease. 1. Inscriptionis Phoe- nicias Oxoniensis Nova Intei-pretatio ; Paris, 1802, 8vo. 2. Lettre sur I'ln- scription Egyptienne de Rosette, adressee a M. Silvestre de Sacy ; ibid. 3. Notice sur deux Inscriptions en Caracteres Ru- niques trouvees a Venise, et sur les Varanges ; avec les Remarques de M. D'Ausse de Villoison. 4. Inscription Grecque sur ime Plaque de Plomb trouvee dans les environs d'Athenes ; Rome, 1813. 5. Lettre sur une Inscrip- tion Pht'nicienne trouvee a Athenes ; Rome, 1814. Of these researches, the whole are remarkable for profound know- ledge of his subject, for correct and ingenious deductions ; and, in fact, his 197 labom-s paved the way for the succeeding inquiries of Young and Champollion, and for all that has been done to elucidate the ancient hieroglyphics of older Egypt and the East. Much of M. Akerblad's remarks on the Rosetta stone will be found in the Cambridge Museum Criti- cum, vol. ii. and in the Arch^ologia, vol. xviii. from which that article is chiefly drawn. With regard to his merits in deciphering Punic inscriptions, the reader is referred to the last publication of Gesenius on that subject, and to the articles Champollion and Young, in this Dictionary. (See Gesen. Inscript. Phcen.) AKERMAN, a Swedish engi-aver, born at the commencement of the eigh- teenth century. His talents becoming favourably known to the Academy of Sciences at Stockholm, that society, in the year 1750, enabled him to open an establishment at Upsal for making celes- tial and terrestrial globes. His globes, as improved by Akrel, another Swedish engraver, have been highly esteemed. AKHSCHID. See Ykhschid. AKIBA, a Jewish rabbi of great re- putation, whose name constantly occurs in the Talmud. His history, like that of most of the Talmudic doctors, is involved in obscurity and fable. The chief facts connected with his history are, however, as follows. After the quarrel and re- conciliation between Gamaliel and R. Joshua, new schools arose in different parts of Palestine — that of Eliezer-ben- Hyrcanus in Lydda, that of Akiba in Banibrah, and that of Joshua in Phekiin. The second of these teachers, R. Akiba, was the son of a Jewish woman, but not of a Jewish father, and for many years of his life was cow-herd to Calba Shebua, a rich citizen of Jerusalem. Having, however, gone to the schools of Joshua and Eliezer, and made great pro- gress under their instmctions, he married the daughter of his fonner master, and received with her a large dowry. The school of Eliezer in Lydda was continued by Akiba, and maintained a high repu- tation. On the appearance of Bar-Cho- chab, R. Akiba prepared in some degree the way for him by predicting that he was to prove the Messiah, and he is said to have been the first adherent of that seditious impostor. By the orders of Adrian, Rufus, the governor of Pales- tine took sevei^e measures with the Jews, who showed symptoms of revolt, and among otliers Akiba was imprisoned. When Bar-Chochab was killed at the storming of Bethar (Bitter, or Bethar, A K I A KO see Reland), with so many thousands of his followers, Akiba was executed in the most cruel manner imaginable, his flesh being torn to pieces with iron combs, A.D, 135. The Talmud, however, asserts that so invincible was his fortitude, that he died saying the Shema Israel, &c, (the daily prayer of the Jews.) The Talmudic passages, on which this account is founded, are quoted in Wagenseil, Sota, p. 982 (his youth and education) ; Raymund, Pugio Fidei, p. 326 (his joining Bar-Chochab) ; and by Dr. Pinner, in his Compendium des Hierosolymitischen- und-Babylonischen Thalmud, p. 33 — 37 (his death and fortitude). It was said in the beginning of this article that his history is extremely obscure and fabu- lously told : the following remarks wiU show that this is not an idle accusation. In one passage of the Talmud it is stated that he was executed by the order of L. Turnus Rufus (properly L.Annius Rufus), which is rather remarkable, because in another passage of the same work it is stated, that he married the widow of this very Rufus, whom he had converted to Judaism after her husband's death ! (See Dr. Pinner, ubi supra.) So much for the consistency with which his story is told ! Let us now consider its fables. In the passages quoted by Wagenseil it appears that his master's daughter mari'ied him secretly when he was about 40 years of age, and then persuaded him to go to one of the schools of the law to improve his mind. Her father, discovering the matter, turned her out of doors, with an oath that she should never receive a penny from him. R. Akiba, after twelve years, returned with 12,000 scholars in his train ; but this did not satisfy the lady's desire for his improvement. She requested him most affectionately to re- turn to his school, which he did for twelve years longer, and again appeared with 12,000 more scholars at his heels. His wife came out to meet him, and scan- dalized his scholars extremely by the poverty and scantiness of her attire, but R. Akiba told them that he and they owed all their learning to her. Her father now was desirous of restoring his daughter to something a little better than starvation, and without knowing who Akiba was, applied for his advice how to evade his oath. The rabbi, as a Tal- mudic doctor or a Jesuit is alwaj^s bound to do, furnished him with an admirable evasion, discovered himself, and they were reconciled, and Akiba received half his property as dowry ! But this is 19S nothing to other parts of his history. His 24,000 scholars all died together, and were all buried in the same tomb with him and his wife ! ! He reached the age of 120 years, and the day on which he died, R. Juda the Holy was born ; so that when one sun set, another rose. (Wagenseil, ubi supra.) The more sober account which is given above is chiefly taken from the autho- rities quoted, and from the AUgemeine Geschichte des Israelitischen Volkes, by Jost, who is himself a Jew, as well as Dr. Pinner. The works attributed to him are as follows : — 1 . Jetzirah, or The Cre- ation, (a cabalistic book, sometimes attri- buted to Abraham himself !) printed at Mantua 1562 ; Constantinople 1724; in Latin, Paris, 1552; Amsterd. 1642, by Rittangel. (De Rossi Diz. voce Jetzirah.) 2. Othioth, or The Letters ; another caba- listic book, published at Constantinople early in the sixteenth century, and occa- sionally reprinted elsewhere. 3. Taghin, 4. Mechiltin, a commentary on the cere- monial law. 5. Abdalla, a cabalistic book on the Sabbath (MS. in the Oppen- heim Library). G. Some Prayers in the Machazor. Dr. Pinner attempts to de- fend the Talmud and the rabbles against all their opponents, and seems to admire Akiba very much. For more on this man, see Raymund, Pugio Fidei, Eisenmenger's Eutdecktes Judenthum ; Jost ; Pinner ; Wolf, Bibl. Hebr. and De Rossi Dizionario Storico, &c. Bartolocci, Bibl. Rabb. and Leusden, Pirke Aboth ; Bayle; Ersch and Grueber's Encyclopedia. It appears that the Jews attribute all the oral law to Akiba, and that R. Meir took it down ! This is an- other of the silly tales in which Jewish tradition delights. It must be added, that there is little reason to suppose R. Akiba the author of the works attri- buted to him. AKIMOFF, a Russian painter, who travelled in Germany, France, and Italy, with a view of improving himself in the art. He visited Rome, Florence, and Bologna, and was most assiduous in his study of the great masters. He had real talent, and was the first of his country- men who had successfidly cultivated the fine arts. He became the instructor of persons of the first rank. On his return to Russia he was chosen director of the academy of St. Petersburgh, was made counsellor of state, and received the de- coration of several orders. He died 15th May, 1814. AKOUI, a Tartar general, jmd first AK O ALA minister at the court of Peking in the reign of the emperor Kienlong, during the eighteenth century. He was early distinguished hy his uncommon assi- duity and application to every branch of science. His talents and merit soon brought him into public notice, and he rose to the most important offices, civil and military, in the state Akoui suc- ceeded in military enterprises where his most eminent predecessors had failed. He was pre-eminently fortunate, skilful, and cautious in all his campaigns, espe- cially in subduing the mountainous pro- vinces of Miao-sse, inhabited by bold and desperate tribes of warriors, uncon- quered till then. As a statesman and a man of science, his abilities were still more remarkable ; his public works were all conducted upon a magnificent scale, and executed with complete success. He turned the course of rivers, formed aque- ducts and canals, opened new roads, and reclaimed large tracts of land from the rivers and swamps. His services, at once splendid and useful, rendered the I'eign of his sovereign, whom he survived long enough to see the happy result of his labours, one of the most fortunate and beneficent which the Chinese empire had ever known. The precise year of the decease of this enlightened minister has not been ascer- tained, but it is recorded that his great and useful laboiu's continued to improve and enrich the people beyond the period of 1782. (Biog. Univ.) AKRA, (Abraham,) author of two works on the language of the Talmud and the Midrash : — 1. Mearere Nema- rim; Venice, 1599. 2. Chilele Midrash Rabba; ibid. 1601. (De Rossi.) AKRISC, a Levantine Jew, who lived at Constantinople, and in 1562 made a voyage into Egypt. He wi'ote Kol Me- basher, The Voice of him that preacheth Good Tidings ; a work to prove that the Jews, even in their exile, have in some sense a kingdom. It has often been printed, and has been translated into German. (De Rossi.) ALA EDDYN HASSAN, ruler of the Ghaurides in Eastern Persia and Northern India, in 543 (1151) threw ofl^ the yoke of the Ghaznevides, and ha\ang become independent, invaded Khorassan and attacked the sultan, Sandjar. He was vanquished and taken prisoner ; but found a generous conqueror, who had the rare magnanimity to treat him with kindness at his own court. The gratitude of Ala Eddyn appeared extreme, and so 199 completely did he succeed by his flatteries in conciliating the sultan's regard, as to obtain his liberty and his dominions. Some of his relatives, however, and also his brother, having rebelled and been cut oft", Ala Eddyn, transported with rage, marched against Ghaznah, commanded by the nephew of the sultan, gained a complete victory, and used it with the utmost barbarity, destroying or taking prisoners the entire population. He was in consequence called Djihansouz. (In- cendiary of the world). The sultan was unable to afford his nephew the slightest relief, being at- tacked and taken prisoner the same year by the Turcomans, who had invaded Khorassan. But Ala Eddyn maintained himself in the mountains of Ghaur, and after the retreat of the barbarians, re- covered his dominion over the Ghaz- nevides, and left it to his son Saif Eddyn Mohammed. Ala Eddyn died about 551 (1156). His son's reign was brief; he was succeeded, most probably re- moved, by his relatives, who subsequently became powerful princes in eastern Persia and parts of India. ALA EDDYN I., twenty-ninth em- peror of Hindostan, second of the dynasty of the Khaldjides, of Afghan origin, was nephew and son-in-law of his predecessor Fyi'ouz Shah II. Appointed soubah of the province of Gurrah, he repulsed the in- roads of the Hindoos, passed the Ner- buddah, 692 h. (a.d. 1292,) devastated their country, destroyed their idols, and returned loaded with immense wealth. Ala Eddyn now conceived the project of conquering the entire Peninsida, and began by treachery. In 1294, pretend- ing to go on a hunting party, and con- cealing his army, he suddenly fell upon Ramdeo, one of the most powerful rajahs of the Deccan. He succeeded in break- ing up the confederacy of the rest, routed an immense army led by the son of Ram- deo, and pillaged the country. Leaving a strong garrison in Ellichpoor, he re- tiu'ned to meet his benefactor the em- peror ; and imposing upon him by the most specious pretences, not only dis- armed his anger, but by affecting the greatest alarm, induced him to come almost imaccompanied to meet the young conqueror. The latter threw himself at the emperor's feet, making a signal the same moment for the assassins to approach. Having thus disposed of the emperor, he marched against the capital of Delhi, entered it in triumph, and usurped the throne. He then seized upon the two sons ALA ALA of Fyroiiz, put out theii- eyes, and left them to perish miserably in prison. He soon defeated the Moguls in immense force, and put his prisoners to death. Guzzerat next fell ; another invasion of the Moguls was overthrown ; till, elated with successive triumphs, Ala Eddyn expressed his ambition to become as great as Alexander and the prophet Mohammed in one person. But con- fining himself to a warlike career only, by the advice of his oldest counsellors, he carried his arms as far as Golconda, subdued Malwah, and completed his conquest of the Deccan. His general, Khodjah Kafour, penetrating through the Mahrattas, entered the Camatic in 1310, and collected such immense booty, that his common soldiers threw away all their silver spoils to enable them to carry more gold. But having overthro'wn his ene- mies, Ala Eddyn had now to contend with repeated conspiracies, in one of which he was attacked andleft for dead, the assassins having refused to cut off the head of the great emperor. But he survived ; and taking the hint, was led to consider seri- ously his position, and set about a reform. He summoned a general assembly of his ministers and the most able men of his vast empire ; they were commanded to ascertain the real causes of the evil, namely, his own unpopularity ; and they reported, that the source of the people's suiFei-ings lay in the monopoly of interests and employments in the hands of a wealthy few — in unjust privi- leges, and the imposition of public bur- dens too great to be borne. Added to these were the alliance of a few rich houses ; the imlimited power of govern- ors ; the immoderate use of spirituous liquors, and the coiTuption of public func- tionaries, extending through all ranks. The emperor instantly set to work in all departments of the state ; — made a ge- nei'al clearance, — a more equal partition of lands, — compelled the wealthy classes and monopolizers to disgorge part of their ill-gotten wealth. He forbade marriages between the Omrahs without his express permission ; reduced taxes ; enforced justice, so that robberies were no longer heard of. Moreover he forbade the use of wine, ixnder penalty of death, command- ing the imperial cellarages to be emptied, and the rich wines to be turned into rivers down the public streets and squares. He endowed schools and colleges ; re- moved all restrictions ; introduced a new cuiTency, so as to fix low prices for all the necessaries of life ; and established 200 large magazines of public stores. Un- fortunately, after having organized a new and sound system of government, he at length relaxed from his noble efforts ; became enervated, and trusted the reins to a minister who abused his confidence. In parts of his vast dominions, munnurs were again heard ; his army suffered a reverse ; and upon becoming sensible that his prime mi- nister had betrayed him, he was seized with rage and indignation, such as, added to previous illness, carried him off in 1316, and in the 20th year of his reign. Subsequent to his death, the treache- rous and inhuman Kafour deprived of sight the two eldest sons of his royal master — a singular retribution ; — and to attain his own objects, placed the" yomigest on the throne. He too was assassinated, and was succeeded by the third son of the deceased monarch, who lived and died a tyrant, the dynasty with him becoming extinct. The subsequent one of Touglouk Shah lasted for nearly a century. (Biog. Univ.) ALABASTER, (Wilham,) an EngUsh divine, born in Suftblk, educated at Cam- bridge,where he took the degree of M.A. ; was afterwards incorporated of the uni- versity of Oxford, June 7, 1592. He is pronounced by Wood the rarest poet and Grecian that any one age or nation pi-o- duced. He attended the earl of Essex in his expedition to Cadiz, as his chap- lain ; was induced to declare himself a Roman Catholic, and published Seven Motives for his Conversion ; but it is observed that he discovered more for returning to the church of England. Alabaster made great proficiency in what is termed cabalistic learning, which consists in the combination of particular words, letters, and numbers, by which it is pretended you can see clearly into the sense of Scripture. But he was also made prebendary of St. Paul's ; doctor of divinity ; and rector of Tharfield in Hertfordshire. He died 1640; andleft the following works : — 1 . Lexicon Penta- glotton, Hebraicum, Chaldaicum, Syria- cum, &c. ; Lond. 1637, fol. 2. Com- mentarius de Bestia Apocalyptica ; 1621. As a poet he was highly applauded ; he wrote the Latin tragedy of Roxana, of which Dr. Johnson observes — " If we produced any thing worthy of notice before the elegies of Milton, it was, per- haps. Alabaster's Roxana." It bears date of 1632, and was acted in Trinity-college hall, Cambridge. ALACAMPE, (Edward,) an Engliah A L A ALA Jesuit, born in 1581, became a member of the English college dicrt»;, 1725—47, 6 vols. ALBERTI, (Solomon, 1540—1600,) professor of medicine at Wittemberg ; born at Nuremberg, 1540 ; was the pupil of Jerome Fabricius at Padua, and be- came one of the founders of modern anatomy. His principal work is a his- tory of several parts of the human body. He discovered the valve called the valve of Basilius, the cochlea of the ear, the lachrymal ducts; and was the first to give an exact description of the kidneys, and of the urinary passages. ALBERTI, (Valentine,) professor of divinity at Leipsic, where he died in 1697, aged 62; wrote against Puffendorf, the Cartesians, and the adversaries of the Augsburg communion ; he attacked also Spener, the celebrated pietist. His more noted works are, his Compendium Juris Naturae, and his Interesse prgecipuarum religionum Christ. : he also wrote two curious dissertations — De Fide Hsereticis servanda; Leipsic, 1662, 4to. ALBERTI DI VILLANOVA, (Fran- cis d',) born at Nice, 1737; author of the best French and Italian, and Italian and French Dictionary ; published also a Universal Dictionary of the Italian Lan- guage; Lucca, 1797. He died at Lucca, 1800. ALBERTINELLI, (Mariotto di Ba- gio,) born about 1475, pupil of Cosimo- Rosselli, was a painter, of violent passions and irregular life, whose works have been confounded from their similarity with those of his friend, Baccio della Porta, better known by the name of Fra Bartolomeo. His St. Domenic and St. Catherine of Siena before the Throne of the Virgin is in St. Silvestro on Monte CavaUo ; and at Florence two of his best pictures are in St. Guiliano ; but his chef d'ceiivre, the Visitation, was transferred from its original place to the tribune of the Royal Gallery. He had several scho- lars ; amongst others, Giuliano Bugiar- dini, Franciabigio, and II Visino, all three Florentines. ALBERTINI, (Francis,) an ecclesi- astic and able antiquary of Florence, flourished at the commencement of the sixteenth centmy. He wrote a work — De Mirabilibus Novae et Veteris Urbis Romae; Rome, 1505 ; — also a Tractatus brevis de Laudibus Florentiae et Saonae ; and a memoir, in Italian, on Ancient and Modern Statues and Paintings in Florence; 1510, 4to. ALBERTINI MUSSATUS. See MUSSATUS. ALB ALB ALBERTINI, (Paolo, 1430—1475,) a celebrated divine and politician, a native of Venice. He entered into the religious service of the Servites ; he taiight philo- sophy, was employed by the republic of Venice in many affairs of state, and sent ambassador to Turkey, when a medal was struck in honour of his memory. He left some theological works, and an explanation of Dante, which have been falsely attributed to Paul Nicolletti. ALBERTINI, (Johann. Baptist von, 1769 — 1831,) a Moravian bishop of some reputation, bom at Neuwied. He was educated in the Moravian establishments at Niesky and Barby, and at the age of 20 became a teacher in those institu- tions. He occupied himself here chiefly with oriental languages, mathematics, and botany. He pviblished, in conjunc- tion with Schweiniz, a book on the Fungi of Niesky, (Conspectus Fungorum in Lusatiae Superioris agro Niskiensi crescentium ; Lips. 1805.) In 1814 he became bishop, and afterwards atttained the highest position and tlie greatest in- fluence among the United Brethren. He published two volumes of Sermons, and a collection of Hymns for the Moravians, called Geistliche Lieder fiir Mitglieder und Freunde der Briidersgemeine, &c. ; Bunzlau, 1821. His hymns have some of the peculiarities of Moravian works, but are highly animated and original. (Wolft"s Cyclopadie.) ALBERTINI, (Francesco Ippolito, 1662—1738,) a celebrated Italian phy- sician, a pupil and friend of Malpighi, with whom he was connected. Zanotti and Malpighi praise him highly ; and in the Commentarii of Zanotti two treatises of Albertini are inserted, one on * Injuries of the Heart as connected with Difficult Respiration,' and another on Peiiivian Bark. In 1699, he was made lecturer on medicine in Bologna. (Tipaldo's Biografia, 1838, vi. 130.) ALBERTINI, (Giorgio Francesco, 1732—1810,) called Giorgio Maria also,) professor of dogmatic theology at Rome, and afterwards in the university of Padua. He was a native of Parenzo in Istria, and entered the Dominican order at the age of 13, and became a celebrated preacher and a highly popular lecturer. His principal works were, some observations on the Antifilosofo of Riccati ; Ferrara, 1781. Riccati's book was an answer to a deistical French work, but Albertini considered the answer unsound also, and answered it anonymously. In 1797, he published II Piano Geometrica, &'c. ; an 233 essay to prove that the common date of the birth of our Saviour is correct. In 1803, his Analisi appeared. In 1798 — 1802 his Lectures on Theology were published in 5 vols, under the name of Acroasi ; and in 1808 a sixth volume appeared. This work involved him in considerable controversy with the party called Tomisti (or followers of Thomas Aquinas), especially with Pellegrino (see the name), who is said in Tipaldo's Bio- grafia to have treated him unhandsomely ; but he was much applauded by other theologians. (Tipaldo's Biografia, ii. ALBERTINUS ^GIDIUS, (1560— 1620,) a satirical writer, whose religious works were formerly popular. He was a native of Deventer, and became private secretary to Maximilian of Bavaria. His chief works, besides a free imitation of Guzman of Alfarach, were — 1. Lucifer's Konigreich, &c. (Lucifer's Kingdom) ; Munich, 1017. 2. ^Egidii Albertini Hirnschleifter ; Koln, 1645— 1686. He wrote in a style somewhat resembling that of Abraham a Sancta Clara, (see the name,) but was hardly equal to him in power, although less provincial and less burlesque in his language. (Wolft"s Cy- clopiidle.) ALBERTRANDY, (John Chrzciciel or Christian, 1731—1808,) bishop of Zeno- polis, a Polish histoi'ian and prelate, bom at Warsaw, entered at 16 into the society of the Jesuits. After having travelled with Felix Lubienski, nephew of the archbishop Lubienski, he received from king Stanislas Augustus the appoint- ment of his reader, and director of his cabinet of antiquities. In 1782 he visited Italy for the second time, and was occupied during three years in copy- ing, from works in the library of the Vatican, matter concerning the history of his coimtry : his manuscripts at the end of that period formed 110 vols. fol. He afterwards visited Stockholm and Upsal, and increased them to 200 vols, folio. This literary treasure now belongs to the library of the gymnasium of Krzemieniecz in Volhynia. He left several works on Roman and Polish history. ALBERTUS MAGNUS. Authors diflTer as to the date of the birth of this great scholar ; some, with most proba- bility, fixing it in 1193, while others bring it down to 1205. His nati\e town was Lauingen, in Swabia. He was of the family of the counts of Bollstaedt, and seems to have been placed, in hia ALB ALB youth, under circumstances favourable to the development of his uncommon talents. After having pursued his studies with great success at Pavia, he entered the religious order of the Dominicans in 1221, at the instigation of his master Jordanus. He now repaired to Paris, where, in spite of the papal bull that proscribed the works of the ancient peripatetic, he lectured upcn Aristotle with great reputation, and his course was attended by crowds of scholars. In 1254 Albertus was chosen to fill the dig- nity of provincial of the Dominicans in Germany, where he established his resi- dence at Cologne, which might then be almost considered as the centre of the learning of western Europe. During his long and laborious life, he ever ex- hibited a marked predilection for this place, which no oft'ers or inducements coidd overcome. Pope Alexander the Fourth in vain sought to bring him to Rome by the offer of the office of master of his palace; but his election in 1260 to the bishopric of Ratisbon, a dignity which he held only three years, caused a temporary absence from the favourite scene of his studies. After having fol- lowed the fashion of his age in preach- ing the crusade in Germany and Bohemia, and assisted at the general council of Lyons in 1274, Albertus finally retm-ned to Cologne, and died there in 1280. Albertus, like Gerbert and Roger Bacon, was the subject of many legendary stories. His preeminence over his con- temporaries in learning, his extraordinary proficiency and experiments in the me- chanical and physicial sciences, were enough, in the eyes of the vulgar, to subject him to the suspicion of dealing in magic. We are told, that at the first outset of his career of learning, the dif- ficulties he met with at tl«e threshold, and the consciousness of his own ineffi- ciency to overcome them, discouraged him so much, that he was on the point of abandoning the path ; but suddenly the Virgin appeared to him, opened the eyes of his understanding, and encouraged him to proceed by the promise of future advancement. Thus it was that he be- came endowed with those astonishing powers of acquiring and applying know- ledge, which he afterwards exhibited. But, as people said, he sometimes left the high road to wander in the for- bidden paths of occult science. It was thus that he made an image which could move and speak, and which his disciple, Thomas of Aquinas, broke to pieces with 234 his staff, in the belief that it was an agent of the evil one. On another occasion, he gave to the king of the Romans (William, count of Holland) a splendid banquet in the garden of his cloister at Cologne, when, in the middle of winter, the garden suddenly took all the clotliing of spring, and preserved it until the repast was ended. Such were the opera- tions which, according to popular belief, Albertus Magnus was in the habit of performing. The acquirements of Albertus were, for his age, sufficiently wonderful. With him began what has been distinguished as the second period of the scholastic phi- losophy. He attempted to reconcile the two contending schools of the Realists and the Nominalists, or rather to combine them in an intei-mediate system ; but he only multiplied the difficulties and con- tradictions which already existed, and excited the dissatisfaction of both parties. He was deeply versed in all the authors who were then read, and has left a vast mass of commentaries upon such works of Aristotle as were then in use in Latin translations. His commentary on the Opus de Animalibus pi-esents so many curious supplements, that it has been supposed that Albertus had a translation of some of Aristotle's works which are not now preserved. In theology he was a follower of Peter Lombard. The world has seen few more vo- luminous writers than Albertus Magnus. No complete list of his woi-ks has yet been made. PieiTe Jammi, a Dominican, collected a great number of them, and published them in twenty-one volumes, folio, at Lyons, in 1651. A catalogue of the different treatises printed in this col- lection, will be found in Fabricius (Bibl. Lat. Med. et Inf. Jitatis, in Albertus). The most extensive list of Albertus's writings wliich has yet been made, is given in the first volume of the Scrip- tores Ordinis Prsedicatorum, by Quetif and Ecliard, where it extends through tv/elve pages in folio. An article on Al- bertus Magnus will be found in the six- teenth volume of the Histoire Litteraire de la France. ALBERTUS, a German monk, who was sent to England as legate by the pope in 1252, to offer the kingdom of Sicily to Richard, duke of Cornwall. He was nominated to the bishopric of Lin- coln, by the pope, in opposition to Robert Grosseteste, but the power of the barons was too great to allow the latter to be ejected from his see. He was afterwards A L B ALB iir-de archbishop of Armagh, and finally 1 It England to receive a prelacy in his native country. He wrote several trea- tises on the life and miracles of St. Ed- mund of Canterbuiy, which are printed in the Thesaurus Anecdotum of Martene and Durand. ALBERT, or AULBERY, a writer in the early part of the seventeenth century. He wrote the Vie de S. Sigis1)ert, Roi d'Austrasie, printed at Nancy, 161G, with a description of Lorraine and Nancy ; and also some Hymns, &c. His books are rare. ALBI, (Henry), born 1590 at Bolene, in the Comtat Venaissin, entered the order of the Jesuits at 16 ; afterwards studied divinity, and was successively rector of several colleges in the south of France. He died at Aries in 1659. He wrote Eloges Historiques des Cardinaux Fran- cais et Etrangers mis en Parallele ; Paris, 1644, 4to, — a superficial work; also, L'Anti-Theophile Paroissial, and an Apology for the same ; some biographies of pious persons, and other religious pieces ; and a Translation of Father Alexander's History of Tunquin, and the Progress of the Gospel there, from 1627 to 1646 ; Lj^ons, 1651 ; a curious work. His other writings are enume- rated in the M^moires de Niceron, torn, xxxiii. (Biog. Univ.) ALBICANTE, (Giovanni Alberti,) a wretched Milanese poet, of a violent temper, from which he was surnamed Fiiribondo and Beatiale, lived in the six- teenth century. He wrote poems on the War of Piedmont, on the entry of Chas. V. into Milan, on the glorious deeds of the same emperor, and on the Anatomy of Love. ALBICUS, archbishop of Prague, whose character has been designedly misrepresented by popish writers, was born ill Moravia ; studied medicine in the university of Prague, and in 1404 took a doctor's degree in law at Padua. For thirty years he practised medicine at Prague, and with such reputation that Wenceslaus IV. appointed him his first physician ; and on the death of the arch- bishop in 1409, Albicus, at his recom- mendation, was elected, though not very willingly, by the canons, as successor to the dignity. At first he was strenuous in his endeavours to suppress the doctrines of Wickliffe and Huss ; but subsequently, when the latter came to Prague, and formed a sti'ong party, he relaxed in his eiforts, either from timidity or principle, and resigned the archbishopric, and re- 235 tired into privacy. He has been attacked alike by the Hussites and by the Papists. Whilst he wore the mitre he bestowed every attention on the progress of litera- ture. The only works he left are on medical subjects. ALBIGNx\C, (Louis Alexandre d', 17!^9 — 1820,) a French general who saw much service in America, Corsica, and India ; also in the armies of the Alps and the Rhine in 1790-3. ALBIGNAC, (P. F. Mamice Comte d', 1775—1824,) a French officer. He emigrated in 1792, and afterwards served under Jerome Bonaparte and in the Rus- sian campaign, but was loyal to the Boiur- bons in 181.5. ALBIGNAC, (the Baron d', 1782— 1823,) a pi-ivate soldier, who became aide- de-camp to Ney, and served in Spain in 1808-12. He afterwards joined the Bourbons, and served as a general in Spain again in 1823. ALBIN, (Robert,) a native of Lan- cashire, born in 1630, died at Tangiers, near Liege, whilst attending the Scotch soldiers who were infected by the plague, Dec. 8, 1667. ALBIN I, (Franz Joseph Freyherr or Baron von, 1748 — 1815,) an Austrian statesman of considerable reputation, and a native of St. Goar. He was educated at Pont a Mousson, DUlingen and Wiirz- burg ; and on receiving the degree of doctor of laws at the latter university, he wrote a thesis on the Definitive Year, 1624, sometimes called the Normal Year, to prove the inapplicability of its pro- visions to trades, (see the Articles of the Peace of Westphalia,) which, except some reports of Decisions printed in Hoscher's Rechtsfiillen, is his only publication. Ha%ing held many judical situations from 1770 to 1787, in which he distinguished himself highly, he was named, in 1787, by the rector of Mentz, (Mayence,) as imperial-referendary at Vienna, where he became much attached to the emperor Joseph II. During the reign of Leopold II. and part of that of Francis II. he was chiefly employed by his own court of Mentz ; and in the revolutionary war, beginning in 1792, he shewed great spirit in organizing the forces of the elector, his sovereign. Albini had so much confidence in the main- tenance of the integi-ity of the empire, that about the time of the peace of Campo Formio, he did not hesitate to purchase an estate on the left bank of the Rhine ! It is now well known, that the great powers ceded the left bank of the Riiine ALB ALB to Frtmee by a secret article in this tr^^aty, to the great consternation of the elector, who, after the evacuation of M Mitz hy the Au^trians and the entry of the French, assured Mortier at Asch- afFeiiberg that he should oppose the French. He was, however, soon in- formed by a messenger from iVlbini, that he was deserted by the great powers ; and submitted. Albini had afterwards the presidency of the congress of Rastadt; and wlien the French envoys were barba- rously murdered, he endeavoured with all his energy to discover the authors of the deed. For some years now, Albini became more a soldier than a statesman ; he organized the Land-sturm of Mentz, and harassed the army of Augereau ex- tremely, showing great military skill. In 1802, on the death of the elector (Friedrich Karl), Albini showed the greatest activity in obtaining the recog- nition, &c. of his successor. Albini con- tinued still to labour for the good of his country, and his labours are looked upon as having highly promoted the national interests of the German people. His conduct is minutely detailed in the life given in the Zeitgenossen, but cannot be described here. Suffice it to say, that the Germans reverence his name, and the French cast no imputation on him. He was named by the emperor in 1815, as Austrian plenipotentiary at the con- ference of Frankfort, but died before he entered on his office. (Zeitgenossen. First Series. 3d Band, No. x. Conver- sations-Lexicon. Heeren's Manual, vol. ii. 201, 247. Biog. Univ. Suppt., where it is said that baron Albini's note to the French ministers on the Rastadt affiiir is to be found in vol. v. of the Memoires tires des Papiers d'un Homme d'Etat.) ALBINO, (Giovanni,) a Neapolitan historian, who lived towards the end of the fifteenth century. He wrote a chronicle of the kingdom of Naples, reaching down to his own days. Tira- boschi (vol. vi. p. 743) refers to several Italian authors who have given an ac- count of him, and speaks of him as a x^ery elegant writer. ALBINOVANUS, (Pedo.) To this Roman poet, Ovid, when in exile, ad- dressed one of his Epistolse e Ponto. Only a few of his hexameters have been preserved. Some scholars have, how- ever, attributed to him the elegies fol- lowing : — 1. Consolatio ad Liviam. 2. De Obltu Mciecenatis. 3. De Mtecenate Moi'ibundo. But his claims to the Conso- latio, although supported by Scaliger, have 236 not been deemed fully established ; while the other two pieces have been rejected as quite unworthy of the age of Augustus. He wrote likewise some epigrams, ac- cording to Martial, v. 5. But if he be the Celsus Albinovanus to whom Horace addressed his Epist. i. 8, and to whose plagiarisms he alludes in Ep. i. 3, 15, we have little reason to lament the loss of his works ; even though Quintilian says of him, (x. i.) that he will serve to amuse an idle reader. His name of Pedo was perhaps derived from Pedum, a town about ten miles from Rome, but which was no longer in existence in the time of the Scholiast on Horace, Ep. i. 4, 2. ALBINUS. 1. The Platonic philo- sopher, who lived at Smyrna, and was contemporary with Galen ; and of whose Introduction to the Platonic Philosophy, a fragment has been preserved. It was first published by Fabricius in Biblioth. Gr. T. ii. ; but omitted in the reprint by Harles, because it is to be found prefixed to Etwall's edition of three dialogues of Plato, Oxon. 1771 ; and to Fischer's four dialogues of Plato, Lips. 1783; neither of whom, it seems, either would or could supply from other MSS. the lacunee in the one used by Fabricius. The author, who lived after the time of Thrasyllus, has adopted his division of the Dialogues, as detjiiled by Diogen. Laert. into physical, moral, logical, &c. ; and has marked out the order in which they ought to follow each other, according to the different objects which different readers have in view. Like the rest of the Neo-Platonists, he acknow- ledges the genuineness of the first Alcibi- ades, which has been abjudicated by the school of Schleiermacher. 2. The Peripatetic philosopher; who wrote in Latin some works on geometry and music, as we learn from Boethius and Cassiodorus; and to whom is per- haps to be attributed the book on Metres to which Victorinus alludes in p. 1957, ed Pubsch. ALBINUS, (Bernard,) an anatomist and physician of the seventeenth cen- tury, was born in 1653 at Dessau, the capital of Anhalt, a Saxon duchy in the north-west of Germany. His eai'lier pro- fessional studies were pursuedprincipally at Bremen and Leyden, at wliich latter place he took his degree ; and after tra- velling for some time in France and Flan- ders, he ultimately settled himself as professor of medicine at Frankfort-on-the- Oder. He here gained considerable re- putation, and was appointed physician to ALB ALB the "great elector" of Brandenburgh, Frederic William ; but on being subse- quently invited, be repaired in 1702 to Leyden, where he continued to hold his professorship in that university until his death, which occurred nineteen years afterwards, in 1721. His eloge was de- livered by the famous Boerhaave, his contemporary and fellow-professor at Leyden. Of his works, which are nu- merous, the principal are — 1. De Cor- pusculis in Sanguine Contentis. 2. De Tarantula Mira. 3. De Sacro Freyen- waldensiiun Fonte. ALBINUS, (Bern. Siegfried,) son of the preceding, attained to a higher degree of celebrity than his father. He was born at Frankfort-on-the-Oder in 1697; and exhibited at an early age, imder his father's tuition, great general talent, and a particular taste for the cultivation of anatomy, v/hich appears to have been, through life, his favourite and almost ex- clusive pursuit. Having been initiated in the rudiments of this science beneath the paternal roof at Leyden, during which period he also profited by the in- structions of the great Boerhaave and Ran, the latter of whom was then pro- fessor of anatomy in the university, he continued his studies under the direc- tion of Ruysch, and subsequently in France, under Winslow and Senac, witli whom he continued on after-terms of intimacy. His merits appear to have been appreciated by his preceptors, whose recommendation, backed by his acknowledged attainments, procured for him, at the early age of 22, the pro- fessorship of anatomy at Leyden (ren- dered vacant bythe death of Rau), an appointment which his talents and inde- fatigable application seem to have quali- fied him to undertake. In the course of the extended period during which he filled this chair, he did much to enrich the science he professed, and to aid in extending its usefulness as a teacher ; in which latter capacity he is recorded to have been eminently successful. The engravings which he caused to be exe- cuted under his superintendence, more particularly those of the bones and mus- cles, are not only beautifid in themselves as works of art, but serve as exemplifica- tions of the accuracy of his dissections, and his intimate acquaintance with his subject. He also edited successively the works of Harvey, the anatomical and surgical works of Vesalius, the Anatomy of Fabricius of Acquapendente, and the anatomical plates of Eustachius. His 237 principal productions are the following : — 1. De Ossibus Corporis Humani; Svo. 1726. 2. Historia Musculorum Hominis ; 4to, 1734. Subsequently, Treatises on the Vascular System of the Intestines, and Bones of the Foetus ; and plates representing the Normal Position of the Foetus in Utero, as well as Annotationes Academics, in 4 vols. 4to, with figures. His splendid illusti-ations still maintain a justly-merited reputation, and have long served as copies for minor works of a similar desci'iption. He died at Leyden in 1770, after having held his professor- ship for fifty years. His brother. Christian Bernard Al- himis, also distinguished himself, though in a minor degree, as professor of the same science at Utrecht. ALBINUS, (Decimus Claudius, d. a.d. 197.) This unfortunate opponent of the emperor Severus, was by birth an African, but descended from noble Ro- man families. Although he had received a literary education, he could not resist the temptation to enter on the profession of arms. In his youth he had, however, so profited by his studies, that he was the author of two works ; the one a treatise on Agricultiure, and the other a set of Stories. During the revolt of Avidius Cassius, a.d. 175, he prevented his soldiers from joining the standard of rebellion in Bithynia, where he was in command ; and M. Aurelius is said to have bestowed the consulship upon him in consequence, but his name is not found in the Fasti Consulares. He after- wards commanded in Gaid and in Britain, where he was at the time of the death of Commodus. Durinsf the contest between Severus and his opponents Julianus and Pescennius, Severus contrived to amuse Albinus by bestowing on him the dig- nity of Caesar. But afterwards fearing him as a rival, he sent persons to assassi- nate him ; and Albinus then assumed the title of emperor, and prepared to support his claim by force of anns. The armies met, a.d. 195, nearTrevoux, and Albinus was entirely defeated. His death is differently told by different his- torians. Some say that he died of his wounds in the presence of Severus ; but Dio Cassius (Ixxv. 7), who intimates that the bulletin of Sevei'us was by no means correct, states that he slew him- self in a house near the Rhone, to which he had fled, and that Severus treated his corpse with indignity. His wife and children were massacred by the conqueroi-. ALB ALB ALBINUS, (Peter,) a historian and poet, born in Misnia in the sixteenth century ; was professor of poetiy at Wit- teniberg, and afterwards historiographer and private secretary to the house of Saxony. He was a learned and accurate writer ; his principal works are — 1. Meis- nische Land und Berg-Chronica ; Dres- den, fol. 1580 — 1599. 2. Scriptores Varii de Russorum Ileligione ; Spire, 1582. 3. Genealogical tables of the House of Saxony (in German) ; Leipsic, 1602. His Latin poems were printed at Frankfort, 1G12, 8vo. ALBIS, (Thomas d'.) See White. ALBITTE, (Antoine Louis, d. 1812,) advocate of Dieppe, and one of the most violent and sanguinary partizans of the French Revolution. Not content with voting for the immediate execution of his own king, in 1791 he guillotined in effigy most of the sovereigns of Em-ope. It woidd have been well had his rage been expended on inanimate objects ; but his cruelties dm-ing his revohitionary mission to the department of Mont Blanc and L'Ain have stamped his name with exe- cration. He attached himself to Napo- leon, and perished in the retreat from Moscow. ALBIZZI, (Bartolomeo, d. 1401,) called also Bartholomew of Pisa, born in the fourteenth century at Rivano, in Tuscany ; was of the order of Franciscans, and derived much fame in the eyes of his brethren by a work in Latin, on the Conformity of St. Francis with Jesus Christ ; which impiovisly compares that saint with the Saviour : it was first printed at Venice, folio, without date or printer's name ; the second edition was printed at Milan, in folio, 1510, in black letter, and another at Milan, 1513, of the same form and type ; all of which are scarce, and seldom complete. In 1590, father Bucchi (a Franciscan) published another edition at Bologna, but with considerable curtailment ; and as it did not sell, it was republished in 1620 with the first two leaves changed, in order to disguise it. The approbation of the chapter of the order is found in this edition, bearing date Aug. 2, 1399. Tirabosclii, (i. 181,) who is very angry with Marchand for occupying sixteen columns of the Diet. Hist, with an enu- meration of the editions of this work and answers to it, shoidd have remembered that after such an approbation, it is no longer the mere woi-k of an individual. In 1632, it was published at Cologne with a new title, and in 1658 at Liege, 238 but very much altered. Wading (Bibl. Ord. Min.) has given a catalogue of Albizzi's other works, which has been copied by Casimir Oudin and Fabricius. ALBIZZI, (Pietro,) whose family, in the fourteenth century, came to be con- sidered as the principal directors of the Guelph party in Florence, was, in con- jimction with Lapo di Castiglionchio and Cliarles Strozzi, at the head of affairs during the glorious war against Gregory XI. which was called the war of liberty. Suddenly the revolution of the Ciompi, excited by the Medici, the Alberti, &c., broke out ; the Guelphs were overthrown ; and Albizzi was brought to trial, accused of having conspired against the demo- cratic party, with several magistrates. Tile populace clamoured for his condem- nation ; and Albizzi, seeing its rage, felt that his case was hopeless, and that if he did not die by the hands of the execu- tioner-, his life would nevertheless be sacrificed, and in a still more hoi-rible manner ; and would be followed by the entire ruin of his family. Accordingly, he prevailed on his companions in mis- fortune to accuse themselves voluntarily of having engaged in conspii-acies of which they were altogether guiltless. He summoned the jxidge to communicate these unex]iected confessions, and march- ed magnanimously to the scaffold. ALBIZZI, (Tommaso, 1347—1417,) nephew of the above, was the chief of the Florentine republic from 1382 to 1417. He was banished after the revolution of the Ciompi, but retin-ned to triumph over his enemies : the Ricci were without a chief, and powerless ; the Alberti and Medici were either exiled or excluded from the magistrature ; the Albizzi reigned without rivals. The cities of Pisa, Arezzo and Cortona were subdued the nobles of the Apennines held obedience ; two powerful enemies, Vis- conti, duke of Milan, and Ladislas, king of Naples, now jrielded to the fortune of Florence, whose pre-eminence during this period is mainly owing to the talents and conduct of her ruler. ALBIZZI, (Rinaldo,) son of the pre- ceding, allied himself with the Medici, the enemies of his family, against Niccolo d'Uzzano, the friend and successor of his father. The new allies soon quarrelled ; Nicolas died in 1433, when Rinaldo drove Cosmo de Medici into banishment. Cosmo was recalled by the mediation of pope Eugene IV., and Rinaldo was soon after exiled, and remained to the end of his days an exile. in ALB ALB ALBO, (Josef, d. 1430,) a native of Sona in Old Castile. He was one of the rabbis who took part in the celebrated conference in 1412, before BenedictXIII. between Jerome (Girolamo) a Christian, and the Jews. Li order to re-establish the Jews in their faith, which had suf- fered in this dispute, he wrote the book of Ikkarim, or Foundations, of which De Rossi has given an account in his Diz. Storico, &c., and also in his Biblio- theca Judaica Antichristiana. In his Annales Hebr. Typograph. p. 44, he states that the edition published at Son- cino is an extremely rare book. (De Rossi in locis citatis.) ALBOIN, king of the Lombards, was son of Audouin, to whom he succeeded in 561. He reigned in the districts which now form Austria and a part of Hungary. His first wife was Clodos- vinda, daughter of Clothaire ; and his second Rosmonda, daughter of Cuni- mund, king of the Gepida?, whom he slew with his own hand in a battle, in which the Gepidae were not only de- feated, but almost all destroyed. The Lombards had inhabited Pannonia for forty-two years, when Alboin, in 568, determined to abandon this district, and to conquer a new kingdom : his terri- tories, which extended from the confines of Sirmia to those of Tyrol, devastated by long wars, and without cultivators, could no longer support a race, whose custom was to live by war and not by labour. Twenty thousand Saxons joined his expedition : he conquered Venetia, and the country between the Alps and Apennines, excepting a few places ; pur- sued his conquering career into Tuscany, in 570 ; and one of his generals, Zotton, penetrating into the south of Italy, founded, in 571, the duchy of Benevento. Pavia surrendered in 572, after a siege of nearly three years ; at this city Alboin and his successors fixed their residence, and made it the capital of Lombardy. Alboin, after having reigned three years and a half in Italy, was assassinated, June 8, 573, at Verona, by an agent of his queen, Rosmonda, to whom, in a drunken fit, he had sent a cup made out of the skull of her father Cuninnmd, in- viting her to di'ink from it. Whether Alboin, as Pavdus Diaconus asserts, (De Gestis Langob. ii. 5, in the first vol. of Scriptor. Rer. Ital. p. 427,) was invited to attack the western empire by Narses, (see the name,) in revenge for the in- gratitude of his masters, has been much disputed. (See Baron. Annal. Eccles. 229 sub. ann. 568. Muratori, Annal d'ltal. ann. 567. See also Tiraboschi, iii. 82 ; Encyclop. Metrop. vol. ii. p. 283.) The common opinion is, that this story is not true. ALBON, (James d'.) See St. Andre, ALBON, (Claude Camille Fraufois, count d', 1753 — 1789,) a descendant of the Marechal de St. Andre. He was the author, among other works, of — Dialogue entre Alexandre et Titus, 8vo ; in which he pleads the cause of humanity against those who are called heroes and con- querors ;— a discom'se on the question, whether the age of Augustus ought to be preferred to that of Louis XIV. which he decides in favour of the latter ; — and also. Political, Historical and Critical Discourses on some of the Governments of Europe; 1779, 3 vols. 8vo. Also of the Eloge de Court de Gebelin. This protestant having been refused christian burial, Albon gave his body a resting- place and a tomb in his garden at Fran- conville, in the Vallee de Montmorenci. His works have been much ridicided, especially by Rivarol, in his Petit Diet, de nos Grands Hommes. ALBORNOS, (Gil Alvares Carillo,) cardinal, was a native of Cuen9a, of the royal blood of Arragon, and a student of Toulouse. Entering the church, he became successively almoner to Alfonso XL archdeacon of Calatrava, and arch- bishop of Toledo. The last dignity he attained while merely a youth. Accom- panying his royal master in the cam- paign against the moors of Andalusia, his sacerdotal character did not prevent his fighting, and he had the good for- tune to rescue Alfonso from n position of some danger ; in return he was knighted, and in 1343 he commanded at the siege of Algesiras. On the accession of Pedro the Cruel, he ceased to be a favourite ; he even incurred the wrath of the monarch, and was glad to seek a refuge at the papal court, then held at Avignon. By Clement VI. he was raised to the dignity of cardinal, and was em- ployed in the most important of secular negotiations. The archbishopric he re- signed, — a mark of disinterestedness worthy of a prince. By Innocent VI. he was equally trusted, and equally ho- noured ; and to him was confided the difiicidt task of allaying the popular dis- content in the Roman states, and of diverting the Germans from the conquest of Rome. Cola di Rienzo, tiibune or senator of Rome, wlio had so much in- fluence over the inhabitants, was no ALB ALB match for him in subtlety ; and liis valour enabled him to reconquer most of the fortresses in the ecclesiastical states. In the midst of his successes, an intrigue of the papal court recalled him to Avignon ; but his successor being un- able to continue his work, he was again sent to the scene of his triumphs. After he had finished the resubjugation of the states from the tyrants who had usurped them, he distinguished himself by his ad- ministration. To Bologna he gave a constitution ; its university he amplified by a new college for Spaniards ; in other cities of the states he promulgated new laws ; and at length he invited the pope to return to Rome, where no tyrant re- mained. At Viterbo, Urban V. requested him to give an account of the ample treasiu-es which he had expended. The cardinal, opening a large chest full of keys, replied, " Holy father, I have ex- pended those treasures in making you master of the fortified places of which you see the keys !" Sensible of his in- justice. Urban embraced him. Having entered with the pope the capital of the christian world, Albornos returned to Viterbo, where he died in 1367. Italy had not occupied all his attention : he had been legate in Spain, to enforce the discipline of the church, and above all to separate the married clergy from their wives. Juan de Ruiz, arch-priest of Hita, (see the name,) had been one of the ecclesiastics whom, for contumacy, or licentiousness, he had confined. (Fer- rera's Histoire d'Espagne by Hermilly. Of this prelate some account may also be found in Ayala, Cronicas de los Reyes de Castilla.) ALBORNOS, (Diego Felipe,) a canon of Carthagena, who translated from the Italian of Bissacioni, a history of the civil wars of England ; and wrote a moral and political treatise, — Cartilla Politica y Christiana; Madrid, 1666. ALBOUY. See Dazincourt. ALBRECHT, (John Sebastian,) pro- fessor of natm-al pliilosophy at Coburg ; born 1695, devoted himself principally to the study of curiosities and monstro- sities ; on various specimens of which he published memoirs inserted in the Annals of the Academy of Natural Philosophers. Another Albrecht {Benjamin Gottlieb) is the author of a work entitled, De Aro- matum Exoticorum Noxa, et nostratium prsestantia; Erfurt, 1740, 4to. ALBRECHT, (John William,) pro- fessor of medicine at Gottingen, where he was succeeded by Haller, is frequently 240 quoted with approbation by the latter. Amongst his works may be mentioned his De Effectibus Musicis in Coiinis Animatum; Leipsic, 1734. 8vo. He died 1736, at the age of 33. ALBRECHT, (John Lawrence,) born 1 732, in Thuringia ; chief singer and musical director in the principal church of Muhlhausen, was equally esteemed as a didactic writer on music, and as a composer. He died in 1773. ALBRECHTSBERGER, (John Geo.) a celebi-ated organist and musical com- poser, born 1729; was appointed, in 1772, organist to the court, and member of the musical academy of Vienna. He has left several compositions, but the work which does him most honour is his Elementary Guide to Composition ; Leip- sic, 1790. ALBRET, (Charles Sire d',) count of Dreux, cousin of Charles VI. accom- panied Louis II. duke de Bourbon, in his African expedition in 1390, and was afterwards at the siege of Tunis. In 1402 he was appointed constable, and in 1405 and 1406, he commanded in Guienne against the English. In 1412 he marched against Henry V. with 14,000 men at arms, and infantry much more numerous than the English ; but was totally defeated at Agincourt, where he fell at the head of his army. ALBRET, (Cesar Phebus d', 1614— 1672,) known at first imder the name of Miossins, and afterwards as Marechal d'Albret, was an adroit and assiduous courtier, who owed his military fortune much more to the favour with which he was regarded by Anne of Austria, and by Mazarin, than to his talents. He figm-ed amongst the lovers of Ninon d'Enclos, and amongst the friends of Mdlle. d'Aubigne. St. Evremond has celebrated in Albret, — " Un marechal, I'oniement de la Prance, Rare en esprit, magnifique en depense." Madame Cornuel, however, calls him, " un grand faiseiu* de galimathias :" she said, when he ceased to pursue her with his addresses, " In truth I am vexed at his leaving me, for I began to under- stand him." He is the military man who deprived D'Ammont of his box at the opera, upon which the latter re- venged himself by exclaiming, " Behold the handsome marechal, who never took any thing but my box !" ALBRIC, (Albricus,) a celebrated phi- losopher and physician, born in London, in the eleventh century, according to the ALB ALB Biographie Universelle, although Leland conjectures that he lived in the reigns of king John and of king Henry IIL He is said to have studied at Cambridge and Oxford, which could scarcely have been the case if we give him the earlier date ; and afterwards to have travelled abroad in search of knowledge. Several works go under his name, as one, De Origine Deorum ; another, De Ratione Ve- iieni ; a third, entitled Virtutes Anti- quorum, in which he treated of the wisdom of the ancient philosophers, and the virtue and prudence of the great men of former times ; and a fourth, called Canones Speculativi. Albric bore a very high character for learning, although so little is now known of his personal history. His works are found in manu- script in different English libraries. ALBUCASIS, called Albitcasa, Buclia- sis, Bulcaris-Gafar, Azaravius, &c., but whose proper name is Aboul-Cassem- Khalaf- Ben - Abbas, was an Arabian physician of Spain, who died early in the twelfth century. His celebrity was great ; but his works, which consist of thirty-two treatises, and which have been translated by an enthusiastic Jew, — Riccio, the physician of Maximilian L — prove that he was little more than a compiler, and even a plagiarist from Arrasi or Rhazes (see the name). He was a surgeon also ; and he not only mentions instnunents, but gives drawings of them. At Oxford, in 1778, there appeared a new edition of his surgical treatises, 2 vols. 4to, Arabic and Latin. ALBUMAZAR, (805—885,) a cele- brated Arabian astronomer. His several treatises, astronomical and astrological, are very common among MSS., and the editions most numerous : a list may be found in Panzer, and Casiri, Bibl. Arab. Hisp. i. 351. The table, called Zydj Aboii-Mashar was calculated on his ob- servations ; but his most celebrated work is his astrological treatise, called, Thou- sands of Years, which settles the time of the world's creation and dissolution, &c. It is reported that he observed a comet in his time above the orbit of Venus. A very curious English version of his Flores, of the fourteenth centiuy, is in the library of Trinity college, Cambridge. ALBUQUERQUE, (Juan Alfonso de,) minister of Pedro the Cruel, king of Cas- tile, was descended from the royal family of Portugal. By Alfonso XI. he had been made governor of Pedro ; and on the accession of the new king, whose vices he flattered, he became the most ' VOL. r. 241 powerful noble in the state. When Pedro fell in love with an attendant on his lady, Doila Maria de Padilla, he encouraged the connexion ; but seeing the empire which she soon obtained over his mind, — the influence of her family no less than her own,: — he repented of his facility, and, in the view of humbling the vipstarts, prevailed on Pedro to marry a French princess, the unfortunate Blanche de Bourbon. (See the name). His marriage had an effect directly contrary to the one intended ; — Pedro forsook his queen, to adhere more closely to his mistress. The minister lost his favour, was banished from the court; and as he plotted against the authority of the new favourites, he was soon compelled to seek a refuge in Portugal. Even here, however, he could not be quiet ; he collected around him all the discontented Castilians, with many adventurers ; and to these joining his own vassals, penetrated into the dominions of Pedro. In the midst of his operations, death — probably through poison — sur- prised him in 1354. ALBUQUERQUE,* (Alfons de, 1452 — 1515,) usually called the great viceroy of India, was a native of Lisbon, and descended from the royal house of Por- tugal. The career of discovery and of colonization on which his countrymen had entered in the East, excited his am- bition ; and in 1503 he was sent by his sovereign, Dom Manuel, Avith a small squadron, to reinforce Vasco de Gania, the Portuguese viceroy in India. He served with great distinction in the wars which his countrymen had to sustain against the native chiefs of Hindostan. Once, if not twice, he revisited Europe to obtain reinforcements. In 1508 he was nominated successor of Francisco de Almeida, in the vice-regal government ; but before entering on his post, he re- solved to signalize himself. He assailed Ormuz ; and though it was defended by 20,000 men, headed by Sheifedin II, or rather by the eunuch Atar, minister of that king, he was victoriovis : Sheifedin was to reign as a vassal of Manuel, and to assist in the construction of a forti- fied town, destined to be the centre of Portugviese commerce in that part of the world. Against Ormuz, he failed : in vain did he surroimd the capital ; his forces were unequal to the entei-prise, and he hastened to Malacca to enter on his charge as viceroy. At first Almeida refused to surrender the dignity, but better feelings prevailed ; and he sailed ♦ Very inaccurate in the Biog. Univ. R ALB ALB for Europe, which, however, he was des- tined never to see. — Albuquerque began his renowned administration by the in- vasion of Goa. The governor, Idal Khan, being absent, he forced the inhabitants to receive a Portuguese garrison. That garrison, however, was soon expelled by the enraged governor, and the viceroy had again to subdue it. He succeeded, but tarnished his lam-els by a horrible carnage. From this time Goa became the capital of the Portuguese empire in India. His great object was to extend his country's domination over the whole of the western coast of the Peninsida, and in pursuing it he was inflexible as the rock. He took revenge for all the hu- miliations which had been experienced ; he caused himself to be feared and re- spected by his enemies, even by the most powerful of the Mohammedan princes. Returning to the Persian gulf, from the Persian king he wrested permission to erect an almost impregnable fortress on the island of Ormuz, and thus attained one of the greatest objects of his ambi- tion. Yet, with all his merit, he was su- perseded by orders from Lisbon. Perhaps that merit was his greatest enemy, since it enabled the men who were jealous of his fame, easily to persuade the king that he was aspiring to an independent sove- reignty in those distant regions. Disap- pointed ambition, sorrow at his disgi-ace, sunk deeply into his soul ; and he died before the arrival of his successor. One of his last acts was to petition the king to take care of a natiu-al son, — the only reward which he asked for his long and splendid services. If some of his acts were violent, — such were the imprison- ment of a minister on the isle of Ormuz, and the execution of a Malacca king, whose only crime was a wish to banish fi-om that peninsula a band of most ava- ricious strangers — he was, beyond all doubt, one of the greatest viceroys Por- tugal ever despatched into the East. The prosperity which the Indian possessions of that power enjoyed during his admi- nistration, rendered him a blessing to them. Impartial, just, rigorous in the punishment of offences, he knew how to maintain internal peace. Comprehensive in his views, enlightened in his policy, firm in his purposes, he did more for the interests of the Portuguese empire in India, than all his predecessors, in the aggregate. Hence his surname of the Great Albuquerque. Dom Manuel, when too late, was sensible of his injustice ; and the only reparation which he could make 242 was to confer unusual honours on the son of his viceroy. (La Clede, Histoire Generale de Portugal, torn. iv. Lemos, Historia Geral, torn. x. Dunham, Spain and Portugal, vol. iii. ALBUQUERQUE, (Matteo de,) one of the few scientific generals of Portugal, was sent in 1628 into the Brazils, to de- fend the province of Pernambuco against the Dutch. He repulsed their attacks, and in 1635 was recalled. In the revolu- tion which placed the house of Braganza on the thi'one of Portugal, he acted a lead- ing part. In the battle of Campo Mayor he obtained a decisive advantage over the Spanish forces ; and was made Conde de Alegretto, and gi-andee of the first class. Subsequently, he was less fortimate, — owing, we are told, to the intrigues of some envious nobles ; was disgraced, and forced to retire to his rural estate, where he died in 1646. There was another Portuguese general of this name — Andrea, who fought in the same war, and was slain at the battle of Elvas, in 1659. ALBUQUERQUE, (the duke of, d. 1811,) distinguished for his resistance to Napoleon in the fii-st invasion of Spain, and still more for the zeal with which he prevailed on the inhabitants of Cadiz to defend that important city against the French. A member of the celebrated jimta of that place, he was too fond of power willingly to obey the regency ; and his embassy to London, where he died, was intended as a kind of honourable exile. ALBUQUERQUE COELHO, (Duarte de,) marquis of Basto, a gentleman at- tached to the household of Philip IV- king of Spain, distinguished himself in the war of Brazil, against the Dutch. On his return to Madrid, where he died in 1658, he ^vl•ote a jom-nal of that war. ALBUTIUS, (Titus,) a Roman Epi- curean philosopher, lived in the seventh century from the building of the city. He studied at Athens, and affected the manners of a Greek. Appointed to the government of Sardinia, he was accused of extortion, and banished ; he retired to Athens, where it is believed that he died. ALBUTIUS, (Caius Silus,) a cele- brated orator and rhetorician of the time of Augustus, was born in Novarra, a city of Lombardy, which he left, because, whilst exercising the office of eedile, those whom he condemned took hold of his legs and di-aeged him from his seat to the gi-ound. Havmg settled at Rome, he associated himself with Munacius ALC A LC Planius, but soon after he opened a sepa- rate school ; and sometimes, though sel- dom, he spoke in the forum, with various success ; till a rather singular adventure obliged him to give it up. In pleading a cause, he thought to make use of an oratorical flourish, by saying to the oppo- site party, " Swear by the ashes and the memory of your mother, and you shall gain your cause ;" to which his adver- sary immediately replied, " We accept the condition." In vain then Albutius pretended to persuade the judges that his offer ought not to be taken literally, as it was simply a figiue of speech. They admitted the oath, and Albutius lost his cause. After this we hear no more of him till in his old age ill health obliged him to return to has native country, where, in the presence of the people, he detailed the reasons of a resolution he had taken to starve himself; which he did soon after. Seneca and Suetonius speak at gi-eat length of his merit, as well as of his vices, which were not a few ; and a passage in Quintilian seems to grant him the merit of having composed a Treatise on Rhetoric. ALCADINUS, a celebrated physician of the twelfth century, at first professor at Salerno, and afterwards physician in ordinary to the emperor Henry VI., and to his successor ; wrote eulogies on his imperial patrons, and a series of Latin epigrams for Frederic II., entitled, De Balneis Puteolanis. The time of his death is not ascertained. ALC^US. The annals of Greek lite- rature present us with three poets of this name ; lyric, dramatic, and epigram- matic. 1. The lyric was of Mitylene, in Lesbos, a contemporary with Sappho and Stesichoi-us, and the first to string the lyre and unsheath the sword in the cause of liberty. After aiding Pittacus in his successful endeavours to free their common coimtry, he became his foe, when the latter changed the character of a deliverer for that of despot ; by whom the poet, when he gave vent to his indig- nation in verse, was banished ; but when, after a fruitless appeal to arms, he fell into the hands of the victor, the former friend forgot his present foe, and spared the politician in the poet ; who, by his conduct in the field, verified the senti- ment of Hudibras ; who says, — " For he who flies may fight again, Which he can never do who's slain." A chivalrous attempt has indeed been made to rescue the character of the bard from the charge of cowardice. But the 243 language of the poet is too precise to admit of more than one conclusion. From the fragments that have come down to us, we can form a fair idea of the loss that literature has sustained in the destruc- tion of poetry, whose echo is but faintly heard in the polished stanzas of the Roman lyi'ist ; who, conscious of his in- ability to equal the vigour of the original, determined to surpass him in the har- mony of the verse, to which nothing similar, or second, has yet been seen, for the union of flexibility with firmness, and of sweetness with strength. It is therefore to be deeply regretted that Horace thought of translating Alcaeus before he had gained a mastery over his muse ; for then he would not have converted the nervous Alcaic into the flimsy Ascle- piadean — "O navis, referent," &c. ; the original of which, saj's Heraclides, AUe- gor. Homeric, p. 413, was written when the bard was unable to express openly what he thought ; while the vivid descrip- tion of a vessel in a stonn was probably a real picture drawn during his voyage to Egypt, mentioned by Strabo, i. p. 63, and from whence we can understand the " dura navis, dura fug^e mala," to which Horace alludes ; who has, in a couple of stanzas in Od. i. xxxii. 6 — 12, detailed all the subjects touched upon by Alcaeus. The fragments of the poet, (who, says Quintilian, is Homer-like — a compliment as high as any writer could wish for at the handsof such a judge, )have been collected by Blomfield in the Museum Criticum, i. p. 492 ; to which neither Matthiae, in his edition printed at Lips. 1827, nor Dindorf, in his Poetae Minores Graeci, (Lips.) have been able to add much that was wanting, or to correct any thing that was wrong. 2. The Dramatist, one of the writers of the middle comedy, at Athens. Of his plays only a few fragments have been preserved by Athenaeus. 3. The Epigrammatist, who has given rise to much dispute amongst the learned; nor is it yet settled whether (see Bayle in Alcaeus) he was or was not the person alluded to in Plutarch Flamin. p. 373 ; or the Epicurean of Messene, banished from Rome by a decree of the senate, u.c. 580, as we learn from Athen. xii. p. 547 ; ^lian, V. H. ix. 12; A. Gell. xv. 11 ; Senec. Consolat. § 10; and Sext. Empiric, c. Mathem. p. 69. ALCAFORADA, (Mariana de,) a Portuguese nun of the seventeenth cen- tmy, who has been termed the Eloisa cf her nation. While in her convent R 2 ALC ALC in the Alemtcjo, she had the misfor- tune to see a French officer, who in- spired her with love. In one respect she greatly resembled her predecessor : her letters (five in nmnber) addressed to the absent lover, describe in the most gra- phic, the most natm-al, the most touching terms, the state of lier heart, her scru- ples, her struggles with the all-powerful influence. In another she was less for- tunate ; she had no devoted Abelard : instead of loving, the officer despised her, and to humble her still more, had the baseness to publish her letters. They produced a great sensation in France. They are certainly striking, and must always be read with interest. The best edition is that of Paris, by Sousa, Portu- guese and French, 1824. The different French versions and editions of these letters (to which seven spurious ones were commonly appended), are enumerated in a note to the supplement to the Biog. Univ. ALCALA, (Parafan de Rivero, duke of,) viceroy of Naples, under Philip II. king of Spain. He succeeded the duke of Alva, whose sternness contrasted greatly with his mildness. He was con- sequently the favourite of the people; nor was the sentiment less ardent when he opposed the establishment of the in- quisition in Naples, and persuaded his sovereign to declare that it never shoidd be established in that kingdom. In other respects he was a usefiil governor : he repulsed the Turks, arrested the progress of the plague ; preserved the inhabitants from famine; and adorned the city by many improvements. In 1571 he died, after a government of twelve years. ALCALA, (Fray Pedro de,) a monk of the order of St. Jerome, was one of the missionaries employed by Fernando and Isabel to convert the Mohammedans of Granada, after the conquest of that king- dom in 1491. His mission was so far useful that it made him learn Arabic, and attempt teaching it to others in his Arte para saber la Lengua Ai'abiga. ALCALA -Y-HENARES, (Alfredo de,) a Spanish poet of the seventeenth century, who settled at Lisbon, where he engaged in trade. Literature, however, was the occupation of his leisure hours. His Viridarium Anagrammaticum, and his five Novelas, are conceited perform- ances without merit of any kind. ALCAMENES, son of Teleclus, mounted the throne of Sparta about the year 747 b. c. He terminated the war of Helos, and commenced that of Mes- sena, 743 b. c. ; he died shortly after- 244 Wards, and was succeeded by Polydoiiis, his son. ALCAMENES, a celebrated Athenian sculptor. Sillig, from a comparison of Pliny, xxxiv. 8, 19, Pausanias, viii. 9, 1, and ix. 11, 4, and other passages, determines the age at which he flourished, and supposes him to have been born about Ol. 77, and to have lived to Ol. 95, (from about 470 — 400 b.c.) He is said to have contended with Agoracritus (see the name), and to have obtained the vic- tory with a Venvis, which was placed in a part of Athens, {ev KrjTron.) Several other works of his are enumerated in Sillig, with references to the passages in which they are mentioned, chiefly in Pausanias and Pliny. (Sillig, Catalogus Artificum. Midler, &c.) ALCAZAR, (Luis de, 1554—1613,) a native of Seville, entered into the order of the Jesuits, taught theology at Cor- dova, and passed much of life in writing a commentary on the Apocalypse. His commentary is, however, of little value. ALCAZAR, (Baltasar de,) a poet of whom little is known, beyond his birth at Seville, in the sixteenth century, and his residence at Jaen and Ronda. He is supposed to have been a soldier, and to have served in the campaigns of Italy. His Epigrams have long been the boast of Spain. By his veiy contemporaries, — by such men as La Cueva and Cervantes, he was highly praised ; and the voice of posterity has ratified the judgment. We, however, cannot see " the delicate inge- nuity and taste" which his countrymen see ; still less can we join in the lavish encomium which declares him " compa- rable a los mas celebres epigrammaticos de los Griegos y Latinos." They who compare him with Martial, have not read, or do not understand, that ancient poet. ALCHABITIUS, an Arabian astro- nomer of the twelfth century. He wrote a treatise on the Judgment of the Stars, and another on the Conjunction of the Planets ; both printed at Venice in 1491, and sevei'al later editions. The Latin translations were made by John of Spain, who also translated the works of Albu- mezar. ALCHINDUS.— See Alkindi. ALCIATI, (Andi-ea, 1492—1550,) son of Ambrogio Alciati, a Milanese noble- man who held the office of decurion, was born, according to Tiraboschi, not in Milan, but in Alzete, a town in the dio- cese of Milan, on the 16th of May, 1492. From his youth, he applied himself to ALC ALC tlie study of jurisprudence. Giano Par- ragio taught him the Greek and Latin languages in Milan. In Pavia he at- tended the law lectures of Giasone Maine, and in Bologna (and not in Co- logne) those of Carlo Ruino, At the age of 22 he took his law degree, and in the same year published the explana- tions and corrections of the Greek words which are found in the Digest under the title of — Paradoxes of Civil Law ; a work which he had WTitten seven years before, at the age of fifteen. In 1521, he was elected a law-professor in the university at Avignon, and discharged his duty with such success, that his pupils were estimated at 800 ! The prospect of hav- ing his salary diminished, induced him to return to Milan, where the improve- ments he introduced in the study of the law excited against him the persecution of all the other professors, vv'hose schools were deserted ; and he fled for safety to France. There Francis I. persuaded him to accept the law-chair in the uni- versity of Bourges, with the salary of 600 crowns, which was doubled in the following year. Francis Sforza, duke of Milan, conceiving it a sort of dishonour to allow so great a man to employ his talents amongst foreigners, was anxious to call him back to Milan ; and this he did, first by the threat of confiscating all his property, and secondly by the promise of a large salary, and by conferring on him the dignity of a senator. After a short time, such was his restless dispo- sition, he left Milan for Pavia ; soon after he removed to Bologna, where he remained four years with a salaiy of 1200 crowns, and returned to Pavia, where his salary was increased to 1500; but even there he coidd not remain. The large offers of the duke Ercole of Este enticed him to Ferrara ; and after remaining there four years he returned to Pavia, and died in January 1550, at the age of 58 years. The vanity of Alciati was equal to his cupidity. One of his friends joking with him on his restlessness, " Where is the man," said he, " that will condemn the sun going round the earth to impart life and warmth to all things ? Though people may admire the fixed stars, there is no one who will despise the planets." Boyle, who relates the anecdote, ob- serves, that since he compared himself to the sun, like that luminary he ought to have remained stationary in the cen- tre, and illuminated the whole. But the fact is, Alciati, by selling his services to 245 those who offered him most, accumu- lated an immense fortune besides his dignities and honours. Paul III. had given him the lucrative office of protho- notary, and offered him ecclesiastical pre- ferment. The emperor Charles V. had created him count Palatine and senator. The king of Spain had made him a pre- sent of a golden chain of considerable value. Yet, notwithstanding his avarice, he was by no means sparing of expense for his table; "Avarior habitus est," Panci- roli says of him, "et cibi avidior;" and it has been supposed that his intemper- ance hastened his end. But if these faults tainted his moral character, he was, at least, pre-eminent in the knowledge of literature and law. By joining them together he explained many obscure and, till then, unintelli- gible passages ; and, according to Ter- rasson, there is no lawyer to whom the students of ancient jurisprudence owe equal obligations. His works were pub- lished at Lyons in 1560 in 5 vols, fol., and at Basle in 1571 in 6 vols, fol., and again at Strasburgh in 1616, and at Frankfort-on-the-Maine in 1617. So many editions of a work of such magni- tude are a striking proof of the merit and talents of Alciati. The edition of 1571 contains thirty-three treatises, amongst which are the two versions of the Treatise on Emblems, (printed in vol. iv. and reprinted in vol. vi. with alterations,) Notes on Tacitus, and a Treatise on Weights and Measures ; but besides these he wrote — 1. Responsa nwiquam antehac edita. 2, De Formula Romani Imperii. 3. Epigrammata se- lecta ex Anthologia Latine versa. 4. Rerum Patriae, seu HistoricE Mediola- nensis Libri Quatuor. 5. De Plautinorura Carminum Ratione. 6. Judicium de Legum Interpretibus Parandis. 7. Enco- mium Historise. 8. Palma. 9. Judi- ciarii Processus Compendium. 10. Contra Vitam Monasticam. 11. Notse in Epis- tolas FamiUares Ciceronis. 12. Twenty- seven Letters in Sudii Epistolae, and others ; amongst which are the work on Duels ; the Book of Emblems, in which, by symboUcal figures, he describes the virtues and vices in elegant epigrams. This work was very popular at the time, when emblems were in great fashion both in France and Italy, and has been translated into the language of both these countries. There are, besides, in the library of Este, a great number of manuscript letters, a short treatise on Versification, and on Plautus. ALC A LC ALCIATI, (Francis,) nephew of the al3ove, was an eminent professor of law at Pavia, where Borromeo was his pupil. He was made a cardinal by Pius VI. and died at Rome in 1580, leaving several works in MS. ALCIATI, (John Paul,) a natiye of Milan, forsook his country in the six- teenth century, and became a Socinian. He and others began their innovations at Geneva, but were soon glad to remove to Poland, where they professed their heresies with more safety and success. Alciati afterwards retired to Dantzic, where he died, some say in the Maho- metan faith, but this Bayle takes pains to refute. He published two letters to Gregorio Pauli, against the pre-existence of Christ. Calvin and Beza speak of him as a raving madman. ALCIATI, (Terence,) a learned Je- suit born at Rome, and patronized by pope Urban VIII., who intended to con- fer upon him the dignity of cardinal, but was prevented by the death of his pro- tege in 1651 ; left behind him some curious materials for a history of the council of Trent, in answer to that of Sarpi, and which were made use of after his death, in a work on the subject by cardinal Pallavicini. ALCIBIADES. In delineating the character of the son of Clinias, Cornelius Nepos has truly said, that nature seems to have tried what she could do in making a man a mass of contradictions. With a versatility unparalleled, he was the gayest of the gay at Athens ; while at Sparta he excelled all in the coarseness of his diet and dress ; at Thebes, he lived the life of a student, and in Persia, of a prince. Of high birth, ample fortune, and surpassing beauty, and v/ith talents fitted equally for the council, the hust- ings, and the field, Alcibiades could scarcely have failed to be, like his guar- dian Pericles, the good genius of his country's destiny, had he not possessed failings, fatal alike to himself and to all that came within the orbit of his attrac- tion. To gratify an ungovei-nable self- will, and ambition without bounds, no sacrifice was deemed too great. The claims of country and the calls of honour were alike forgotten or derided, and all the distinctions between right and wrong confounded in practice, as they had been taught in theory, by the sophists who then SAvarmed at Athens. Had, indeed, Socrates possessed more than a transient control over the waywai'dness of his tem- per, Alcibiades would have shone as the 246 vivifying sun of Greece, instead of blaz- ing like a comet with all the brilliancy of a pestilential meteor. By his father's side, says Plato, Alcibiades traced up his pedigree to the heroic ages; while his mother, Deinomache, was a descen- dant through Megacles of the noble race of Alcmaeon ; and so minute are the particulars collected of his life, that, while the mothers of other great men are un- known, the very name, says Plutarch, of his Laconian niu-se, Amycla, and his tutor, Zopyrus, have been preserved. At an early period, he showed that he was, what Aristophanes calls him, "a lion's whelp;" for while he was playing at marbles in a narrow street, a cart was about to pass over the hole into which he was going to throw his marble, when the carter was requested to stop awhile ; on his refusal to do so, Alcibiades laid himself on the ground in the way of the cart, and bade the man drive over his body. He had scarcely come of age when he entered upon his political life, and became leader of the war party, and the opponent of Nicias ; who, taught by his earlier victories the uncertainty of war, and cooled by age and experience, was anxious rather to preserve peace at any price not inconsistent with the wel- fare of his country. All the arguments of prudence were, however, rejected by those, whose national vanity and love of glory or gain, inherent in states puffed up by success in trade, Alcibiades moulded to his piu-pose ; and led them to enter upon the expedition to Sicily, which was destined to be the grave of the cautious Nicias and the dashing Demosthenes ; and from which Alcibiades escaped only because his fickle countrymen were de- termined to destroy the object of their previous worship, unconsciovis of the mischiefs which he could and did bring upon the land of his birth. Timon, the misanthrope, seems, however, to have taken a correct view of his character. Meeting Alcibiades as he was returning home followed by a great concoui'se of people, he thus addressed him : — " Well done, my boy; still big and bigger grow; Full-sized, much ill on these thou'lt shortly throw." And with a similar feeling Archestratus said, the earth could not bear two suns, nor Greece two Alcibiades. No sooner did he appear in the arena of politics, than he eclipsed (says Plutarch) all the demagogues of the day ; and though he had a defect in his delivery from con- founding the letter r with I, and wanted A L C ALC I the fluency of an Jischines, yet for the pertinence of his matter and the choice of his words, Theophrastus testifies he was all-svifhcient ; as may be infeiTcd from the imitations of his speeches pre- served in Thucydides ; for the speeches tliemselves were probably not published ; at least Demosthenes, when alluding in his Midian Oration, p. 139, to Alcibiades, as being a powerful speaker, refers merely to a hearsay on the subject. The first occasion in which he was opposed to the policy of Nicias, was relative to the sur- render of the pi'isoners taken by Cleon at Pylus; which Nicias had undertaken to bring about to gratify the Lacede- monians, whose pride had been piqued at finding some of the peers of Sparta amongst the captives. The arrangement was, howevei', foiled by Alcibiades; who, at the very moment when he was de- ceiving the Spartan ambassadors, was considered by his dupes a mail of no common talent. Previous to the sailing of the Sicilian expedition, in which Alci- biades was appointed joint-commander with Nicias and Lamachus, it happened that certain statues, sacred to Hermes, were one night mutilated. Suspicion fell upon Alcibiades, as the author of an act of impiety ; about which, for some reason not sufficiently explained, a great stir was made at Athens, as it was sup- posed to be connected with a design to overthrow the democratic form of govern- ment. These suspicions, which were almost laid to rest previous to the de- parture of the troops, broke out again with redoubled force diu-ing the absence of Alcibiades, and he was ordered to return home to stand liis ti'ial. Antici- pating a fatal result, he escaped from the state vessel sent to fetch him ; and after a brief concealment in Italy, ap- peared at Sparta to verify his assertion, that though the Athenians had decreed his death, he would show them he was still alive. At his instigation, the Spar- tans sent Gyhppus to Sicily, and gave the SjTacusans what they stood most in need of, a general fit to compete with the best of those from Athens. He likewise recommended the Lacedemoni- ans to carry on the war with vigour in Greece, while the elite of the Athenian troops were in Sicily. Disgusted at tlie usual sluggishness and imperturbability of the Spartans, so contrary to his own activity of mind and body, he crossed over to Asia, but not before he had been engaged in an adulterous intercourse with Timsea, the wife of Agis, one of the 247 kings of Lacedemon, — an act to which Alcibiades was led not so much by pas- sion, as by the vanity of saying that his blood flowed in one of the royal houses of Sparta. Arrived at the coiu-t of Phar- nabazus, one of the satraps of the Persian empire, he so gained the ear of the vice- roy, as to lead him to unite with the Lacedemonians in assisting to break off the connexion that existed with Athens and Ionia ; while he found for himself a protection against the attempts made on his life by Agis, and others whom he had injured or insulted. But though he was thus doing no little mischief to the land of his birth, he still felt a desire to retm-n to it. Accordingly he left no means unemployed to excite the mutual jealousies of the Persians and Lacede- monians, and to secure to Athens the influence it once possessed in Samos. In both endeavours he was equally suc- cessful, but not before he had incurred the suspicion of Tissaphernes, whom the Lacedemonians accused of harboiu-ing an enemy of theirs ; and as such com- plaints were likely to reach the ear of the king, Tissaphernes, for his own safety, and to show his zeal in the cause of his master, laid hold of Alcibiades, and de- tained him as a prisoner at Sardis. After the lapse of a month, however, Alcibiades contrived to make his escape, and then accused Tissaphernes of having let him go. Finding that he had made an enemy of Tissaphernes and the Lace- demonians, he boldly joined the Athe- nian fleet, by whom he was received with welcome, not so much as a deserter from the enemy, and being privy to their plans, as from the dread, which his coun- trymen no longer felt, that his talents would be directed against themselves. Shortly after his junction, the Athenians gained a decided victory over the com- bined forces of Mindarus and Pharna- bazus, another Persian satrap, and thus recovered the power and places they once possessed on the continent. As soon as this success v/as made known at Athens, all impediments to his return were I'emoved at once ; his sentence of outlawry was reversed ; and he entered the city, not with the downcast look of the forgotten exile, but with all the pcnip of a victor upon whom every eye was turned, anxious to see the man who had first destroyed, and then restored, the power of their comitry, and, what tickled the Athenians still more, had enabled a people fond of amusement to enjoy again the procession from Eleusis by land, which A LC A L C the occupation of Deceleia by the Spar- tans (the very step that Alcibiades had recommended) had prevented, and com- pelled it to go by sea, shorn of half its splendour and fun. Such was the enthusiasm excited in his favour, that he was actually urged, like Caesar, to make himself king, and rise above the shameful decrees which the malice of mob-leaders had directed against him. After a short stay at Athens, he returned to Ionia, where, in consequence of the failure of an inferior officer, he inctirred the suspicion of having sacrificed the in- terests of his country — for it was said that had he exerted himself, success would have been certain. Being superseded in the command of the fleet, he retired to Thrace. Still his heart was in his coun- try's cause ; and though he warned the Athenian admirals to be on their guard against the plans the enemy would pro- bably adopt in their attack, yet his ad- vice was disregarded ; nor was its value known till after Lysander had gained the victory at ^gos - Potamos ; from whence he sailed to Athens, and making himself master of the city, placed in it the Thirty Tyrants. Aware of the active part he had lately taken against the vic- torious Lacedemonians, Alcibiades de- termined to put himself, as Themistocles had done, under the protection of the king of Persia. For this purpose he went to Pharnabazus. But scarcely had he arrived there, when a message was sent to the sati-ap from Sparta, requesting him to take Alcibiades dead or alive. The task was imposed upon two Persians, who, not daring to enter the house where he was, set fire to it ; but while he was making his escape, he was struck by a stone and killed. Thus ended the career of a man, whose early life was as much envied as his death was to be pitied. He was the only private person who had ever sent down to the Olympic games seven chariots, and carried off the prize as first, second, and third, in three contests respectively ; and after his vic- tory entertained the whole company assembled there ; while the splendid man- ner in which he did the duties of the Choregus at Athens, and defrayed the expense of the three contests of the Dionysia, dramatic, lyric, and dithriam- bic, was such as only a person of princely mind would have conceived, or of princely fortune executed. ALCIDAMAS, the pupil of Gorgias, lived about 425 b.c. He is probably the rhetorician to whose Encomium on Death 248 Cicero alludes in Tusc. i. 48. He wrote likewise a work on rlietoric ; another called ^va-iKov ; a third Movcreiov ; a fourth De Naide Mereti-ice ; and was supposed to be the author of The Con- test between Homer and Hesiod. The two declamations, however, which pass under his name, and are to be found in Reiske's Oratores Grgeci, are evidently of a later age. The one put into the mouth of Ulysses seems to have been written in reply to The Apology for Palamedes, attributed to Gorgias ; but which one would rather assign to Alcidamas, whom Plato, in Phaidr. p. 351, A. calls " the Eleatic Palamedes;" while Gorgias is compared to Nestor, and Thrasymachus to Ulysses. Of the other declamation, written in a better style, the object is to prove that a public character should rather study to speak like an orator than to write like a sophist. It would seem to have been directed against Isocrates, who is said to have expended ten years on his single speech the Panegyric ; and it was perhaps from this identical decla- mation that Tzetzes, in whose time the Encomium on Death was already lost, says, in Chiliad, xi. 752, that Alcidamas found fault with Isocrates. ALCIMUS, (Latinus Alethius,) was a historian, orator, and poet, born at Agen in the fovu-th century ; of whose works nothing has been preserved but an epi- gram on Homer and Virgil, in the Corpus Poetarum of Maittaire; London, 1714, 2 vols. fol. ALCINOUS, a Platonic philosopher, whose age and country are equally un- known. He has left An Introduction to the Doctrines of Plato. It should be called, as it is in some MSS., An Epitome of the Platonic Doctrines, relating to God, Man, Matter, &c. arranged under different heads. The style is perspicuous and elegant; but the subject is occasion- ally obsciu-e, especially in § 13, from the want of geometric diagrams. From the fact of finding in Eusebius, Prsep. Evang. xi. 23, a passage quoted from Didymus, which exists in Alcinous, § 1 2, Fabricius inferred that the latter borrowed from the former, or else that both drew from a common source. The writer keeps so close to his subject, as to introduce only once a quotation from any writer but Plato, and that is a passage from the Medea of Euripides, probably obtained second-hand from Chi-ysippus. It was first made known by the Latin version of Petrus Balbus, and printed, 1472 ; then by the translation of Marsilius A LC A LC Ficinus, done when he was a very young man, and printed by Aldus, Venet. 1497. The latter has been often reprinted, and, like Valla's version of Thucydides, adapted to the Greek text ; which was first published by Mich. Vascos. at Paris, 1533, and then tjy D. Heinsius, at Lugd. Bat. 1607, who put it at the end of his edition of Maximus Tyrius. It is to be found likewise in the Prolegomena to Fischer's edition of the Four Dialogues of Plato ; Lips. 1783. Thomas Stanley, too, translated it into English, and sub- joined it to the Life of Plato, in his His- tory of Philosophy. 2. There is another Alcinous, a writer of Epigrams in the Anthologia Latina of Burmann, i. p. 355, of whom, like the Greek philosopher, nothing is known. ALCIONIO, (Pietro, 1487—1527,) was born in Venice of poor and low pa- rents, towards the end of the fifteenth century. It has been asserted that Al- cionio was not his family name, but he assumed it for vanity's sake, to conceal the lowness of his birth, and give him- self an air of antiquity. From Marco Musuro he learned the ancient languages, and such was his progress in them as to be a candidate for the chair, which had become vacant by the death of his mas- ter ; in the mean time he was the correc- tor of the press to Aldo Manuzio, and is therefore entitled to a share of the praise bestowed upon the editions of that cele- brated printer. He translated into Latin the orations of Isocrates, Demosthenes, and several works of Aristotle. They were severely criticised by Sepulveda, in a printed work, containing all the mis- takes which he had committed ; and such was the vexation which Alcionio felt, that he bought all the copies he could find, not of his own work, as many winters have asserted, but of Sepulveda's, and burnt them. In 1522 he left Venice, and went to Florence, where, through the protection of the cardinal Sicelio Co- lonna, he obtained the Greek professor- ship, with a liberal salary, to which the cardinal added a pension of 120 ducats, to translate into Latin the work of Galen, De Partibus Animalium. When that cardinal was elected pope, under the name of Clement VII., Alcio- nio, in the hope of bettering his fortune, went to Rome, against the will of the Florentines. During the troubles that took place between the Colonnas and this pope, Alcionio continued faithful to him ; and even when the emperor's troops took the city in 1527, he was wounded by a 249 shot whilst retreating with him to the castle of St. Angelo. But not receiving the reward which his v;.nity led him to expect, as soon as the siege was raised, he was base enough to desert Clement, and go over to his enemy cardinal Pom- peo Colonna. His ingratitude, however, did him no good, for he died a few months after, at the age of 40 years. The fact is, Alcionio was of a satiric character, fond of abuse and detraction, and ex- tremely vain ; which is sometimes the case with those who, raising themselves by their own exertions and talent, wish to conceal the lowness of their origin. Giraldi, in his Dialoghi sopra i Poeti of his time, says, that Alcionio " was not less imprudent than impudent." Of the works of Alcionio, that which is most celebrated is the ti-eatise, Medices Legatus, sive de Exilio ; printed in Ve- nice in 1522, and reprinted by Mencken, in Leipsic, in 1707, with those of Vale- rianus and ToUius, under the title of Analecta de Calamitate Litteratorum. The appearance of this work exposed him to the heavy accusation of having stolen, and embodied into it, the treatise of Cicero, De Gloria, and for the sake of concealing his theft, to have burnt the MS., the only copy then in existence. The first person who brought this accu- sation against Alcionio was Paolo Ma- nuzio, who pretends that a copy of this work, De Gloria, was left by Bernardo Giustiniani, with the whole of his library, to a nunnery ; and that Alcionio, having been entrusted with the care of this library, had stolen it. The same accu- sation was afterwards repeated by Paul Jovius, and others ; but the arguments in favour of its fallacy are so many and cogent, that we cannot but subscribe to the judgment of the indefatigable and accurate Tiraboschi, who, in the first vo- lume of his Storia della Letteratura Ita- liana, fully acquits Alcionio. The fact is this : it is beyond question that Petrarch had a copy of Cicero's book De Gloria ; for he relates how he had acquired it, and how he lost it. He says one of his former masters asked for the loan of the manuscript. Although Pe- trarch " prized this book moi'e than a treasure," yet he did not refuse ; but after a long time he requested his master to restore it. On being much pressed, he at last confessed that through poverty he had pledged it, " but Petrarch coidd never prevail on him to divulge the name of the person who had advanced the money. At last the master died iu ALC ALC Tuscany, whilst Petrarch was in France ; and notwithstanding all his efforts, he never could obtain the least intelligence of the book, and nothing more was heard of it. Giustiniani died in 1489; Paolo Manuzio wrote about the middle of the sixteenth century ; and the book De Exilio of Alcionio was published byAldo inl522. ALCIPHRO. Neither the age nor country of this writer of imaginary letters has been made out satisfactorily. From the fact of finding in the letters of Arista?retus, a correspondence carried on between Lucian and Alciphro, it has been inferred that the writer considered the parties as contemporaries ; and al- though Alciphro seems to have borrowed much from Lucian, it has been argued that such resemblance is owing to the fact of both having drawn from a com- mon source, the remains of the comic stage of Athens : there is, however, this difference between the two, that Lucian resorted to Ai'istophanes, and borrowed only occasionally from Menander, while Alciphro followed almost entirely the new comedy, and took but little from the old. Li fact, he seems to have amused himself with taking a speech in a play, and throwing it into the shape of a letter in prose, and this with alterations so trifling as to require but little trouble to recover the original poetical form. From the use of certain words, either modern or used in a modern sense, it is evident that he was not an Athenian, although he introduces some of his cha- racters as living at Athens. The ima- ginary writers are fishermen, country- men, courtezans and parasites, and their talk is evidently got from books, not natiu-e. The work is not quoted by any writer older than the author of the Ety- mologicon Magnum, who is supposed by Fabricius to refer to him in AtreXyaii/f ti/ ; while he is distinctly mentioned oftener than once by Eustathius, and described by the appropriate title of Atticist. Forty-four letters were first published by Aldus ; and subseqvxently in a more per- fect form by the learned and eccentric Stephen Bergler, at Leips. 1715, 8vo ; who added twenty-eight letters not pre- viously published. Bergler's edition was reprinted l)y Wagner, at Leips. 1798, but in a very unscholarlike manner. Bast, from whom Wagner received the collations of two Vienna MSS., com- plains in his Epistola Critica, p. 1G4, ed. Lips., of Wagner's inability or unwilling- ness to use the readings which the best MSS. offered — a charge that may be 230 made against more than one editor of ancient authors. He confesses, however, in p. 223, that the collection of the frag- ments given by Wagner is as perfect as it could be made without the assistance of the Paris MSS. The letters were translated into English by Monro and Beloe; Lond.1791, 8vo; who seem to have known nothing of the French version which appeared at Paris in 1784, 3 vols., under the title of Lettres Grecques par le Rheteur Alciphron, ou Anecdotes sur les- Moeurs et les Usages de la Grece, &c. ALCIPPUS, a Spartan, who was ac- cused of having wished to change the laws of the republic, and banished a little before the third Messenian war. ALCMiEON, a philosopher of Crotona and disciple of Pythagoras, flourished pro- bably about 500 B.C. He acquired a high reputation in the Italian school, having been, it is said, the first to attempt the dissection of the dead body. He wrote a work on the Nature of Things, which was refuted by Aristotle, but his treatise is lost. The opinions of Alcmaeon may be gathered from Plutarch and Stobasus. ALCMAN, one of the few poets to whom Laconia is said to have given birth. By some the burgh of Messoa has been assigned as liis native place. But Crates, the grammarian, with wliom Velleius Paterculus, i. 18, and ^lian, V. H. xii. 50, agree, says that he was of Sardis in Lydia, the son of Damas or Titarus, and originally a servant of He- gesidas, or more probably Hegesilas. He flourished about b. c. G70, and was the first Greek poet who gave up the heroic measures for lyric ; and as he wrote for the Lacedemonians, adopted the Doi-ic dialect. His poems, chiefly amatory, were collected into six books, under the title of Ilapdevfia, " Virgin Songs;" an expression that will be best explained by the passage in Horace, — " Carmina non prius Audita, Musarum sacerdos, Virginibus puei'isque canto ;" and who there probably alludes to the fragment of Alcman preserved by the Scholiast on Hermogenes, p. 400, Ald- walch, of which the sense is — " Come, Muse, come, and sweetly sing; Soft 's the strain, and new 's the string; Oil ! lead along The virgin throng." Amongst his poems, mention is made of one with the title of Ko\vfj.^a)J/ei/deTai) as if he were to say that two and two make five." II See Queest. Natur. lib. ii. c. 8, seq. and both his treatises De Anima. Eiooe is translated as above, in accordance with what Alexander himself says, Quaest. Natur. lib. ii. c. 10, Kalio ie to ^mov, ^a>ov CiTTtv, eiduv rovTO auTOv' ttclv I'ap KaOo XeycTat re Kai e his father, intending him to succeed, instead of the latter to the throne. At 16, he was married to the granddaughter of the grand duke Frederick of Baden, who, on becoming a member of the Greek church, assumed the name of Elizabetli Alexiewna. On the night of the 23d of March, 1801, Paul I. was assassinated, and immediately afterwards Alexander was saluted as emperor by the conspirators. Tliough he had been well aware of the conspiracy against his father, he had only contemplated his de- thronement ; and it is said that he liesi- tated at first to accept the crown ; but this hesitation was of short dm'ation. His accession was signalized by a series of beneficial measures, many of them revoking the absurd and vexatious ordi- nances which his father had lately issued. He put an end by a convention to the differences which Paul had had with England, and maintained the ti-eaties existing between Russia and France. In June 1802, he had an interview at Memel with the king of Prussia, of which the object was the independence of Ger- many, then menaced by the encroach- ments of France. On his return, he labom-ed strenuously to improve the administration of justice throughout his dominions ; he encouraged letters and the arts, established gymnasiums, founded three additional universities, and created schools of chemistry, medicine, and navi- gation, in different parts of the empire : ALE ALE seconded by his mother, he also built several hospitals, asylums, and other cha- ritable institutions. In 1803, the Russian army was increased to 500,000 men : the emperor had announced at his accession that he should carry out the system of policy of Catherine IL which is well known to have been no other than that of establishing the preponderance, or rather the domination of Russia, both in Europe and Asia. The murder of the duke d'Enghien excited the most violent indignation on the part of Alexander. He refused to acknowledge Napoleon as emperor, and soon afterwards entered into a coalition with Austria, England, and Sweden, against France. The short campaign which ensued was terminated by the battle of Austerlitz, after which Alexander retreated into Poland. He still, however, determined to make head against his enemy ; and it was not till after hotly contested actions had taken place at Czamowo, Pultusk, and Goly- min, that his ardoiu" abated : he then concluded an armistice, which was equally desired by the French, and which was prolonged till the spring of 1807. In the East, in the mean time, he had been more successful, except against the Turks, with whom, after the death of Selim, he entered into a treaty. The war with France in 1807 was again un- successfid ; and after the defeat of Fried- land, he made proposals of peace to Napoleon, which were followed by the memorable conferences of Tilsit. Alexander was now obliged to consent to terms himiiliating to himself, most prejudicial to his Prussian ally, and dis- astrous to the liberties of Europe ; but he appears only to have acquiesced in them by necessity, and secretly to have favoured England. In 1808 Alexander unjustly seized upon Finland, and incor- porated it with his territories. Shortly after, the Russian fleet under Siniawin was captured by the English, but was restored at the termination of the war. At Erfurt, in October 1808, Alexander and Napoleon again indulged in public demonstrations of regard, but they were insincere. Alexander, after declaring war against Austria, failed to assist Na- poleon with his promised contingent. By the treaty of Schonbrunn, which shortly followed, the district of Cracow was an- nexed to Russia. In 1809 a war broke Out with Turkey, which lasted for some time, assuming at length a favovxrable aspect for Russia, but which Alexander, nipnaced by Napoleon, was compelled to 291 terminate by a treaty of peace, concluded at Bucharest in 1812, under the me- diation of England : the hostilities which had for some time been carried on against Persia ceased at the same period. War with France had long been inevit- able ; and the French having crossed the Niemen on the 24th of June, 1812, Alexander announced in a proclamation the approaching campaign. Zeal for their country, and indignation against the French, animated all classes of Rus- sians. Alexander entered into an alli- ance with England, acknowledged tlie Spanish cortes assembled at Cadiz, and by specious promises won over Berna- dotte to his cause. The disastrous cam- paign of the French, the conflagration of Moscow, and the retreat of the scanty remnant of their army, must be read in the history of that eventful time. There also the details of the second expedition of Napoleon in 1813 must be sought. In these great events, Russia, under the guidance of Alexander, bore a most con- spicuous part. In the campaign of 1814, so fatal to France and to all the countries traversed by the contending armies, the benevolence and affability of Alexander tended to assuage the sufferings insepa- rable fi"om the train of war ; but they did not cause him to abandon the firmness and resolution with which he had en- gaged in and prosecuted this mighty contest. On the 31st of March, 1814, he entered Paris at the head of his troops, showing himself most graciously disposed towards its inhabitants : he refused to inhabit the Tuileries, and took up his re- sidence at the house of Talleyrand. He declared that he had fought against Na- poleon, and not against the French, of whose freedom he pronounced himself the friend, sanctioning the introduction of liberal institiitions : all the prisoners whom he had made during the war he caused to be liberated. Deferring the consideration of political questions, he appeared for some time solely to labour to render himself popular with the Pari- sians, with whom accordingly he soon became a great favourite. He break- fasted with marshal Ney, visited Lafitte, and had several interviews with Josephine at Malmaison. On the 31st of May, after dining with Louis XVIII. at the Tuil- eries, he quitted Paris for England, ac- companied by the king of Prussia ; the duke of Clarence commanded a squadron which escorted him across the straits of Dover. He appeared at Carlton House in an English uniform, and with the in- v2 ALE signia of the order of the Garter. In London he was the caiise of as great ex- citement as in Paris. He returned to Russia by way of Holland, and re-entered his capital July 25, 1814. He had pre- viously sent an order to the governor of St. Petersburg to suspend the splendid preparations made for his reception, saying, " The events which have termi- nated the sanguinary wars of Europe are the work alone of Almighty God ; it is before him that we must prostrate our- selves." His first care was to heal the wounds which the war had inflicted on his dominions. After taking measures with this intent, and concluding an ad- vantageous treaty with Persia, he pro- ceeded to join the congress of Vienna, and reached that capital Nov. 23, 1814. On the escape of Napoleon from Elba, Alexander made instant preparations for renewing the war ; he ordered a force of 170,000 men to move upon France, and was at Heidelberg when the intelligence reached him of Napoleon's total defeat at Waterloo. In the second visit which he now paid to Paris, Alexander showed himself naturally imder much less popu- lar coloiu's than at the first. Struck with the perils to which democracy and irre- ligion exposed the thrones of Europe, he now conceived the project of the Holy Alliance, which was realized by an act which, on the 26th of Sept. 1815, he signed, together with the empei'or of Austria and the king of Prussia. The principal object of this novel treaty, in originating which Alexander is said * to have been much influenced by the Ba- roness de Krudener, was to establish and maintain, on the invariable basis of re- ligion, justice, and legitimacy, the peace and order existing in christian countries. He returned to Russia at the end of 1815, and was xmwearied in his exertions to improve the condition of his dominions. He was, like Napoleon, impatient of re- i)ose ; half of his life may be said to lave been passed in travelling and in military expeditions. In 1818 he opened the Polish diet at Warsaw, and then quitting this capital, visited the southern provinces of his empire. Towards the end of the year he joined the congress of Aix-la-Chapelle, where he again showed himself lenient towards France. On his return he ameliorated the condition of the peasants, enfranchised numerous serfs, completed the organization of six universities, placed the Lixtherans and * This is denied by La Harpe. See Heeren's Manuiil, ii. 441. 292 ALE Calvinists under the protection of his government, though himself zealously attached to the Greek Church, and ba- nished the Jesuits from Russia. The con- stitution which he had given to Poland was far from working as he expected ; the debates of the diet were stormy, its proceedings violent ; he accordingly closed it, and took vigorous measures to counteract the revolutionary spirit already prevalent. In the negotiations of Troppau and Laybach, he was evi- dentlv actuated by the spirit which dic- tated' the Holy Alliance. With respect to the war which soon afterwards broke out between the Greeks and Turks, he gave orders that a strict neutrality should be observed : the sidtan regarded him as an insidious enemy, but an open rupture did not ensue. In 1821, and the suc- ceeding years, he continued his exertions in the interior of the empire. In the autumn of 1825, he visited Taganrog, at which the empress Elizabeth had already taken up her residence for a short time, on account of the mildness of the air. After remaining here a month, he set out on a journey through the Crimea, fi-om which he returned to Taganrog in November, bringing with him the seeds of a mortal malady. It was of a febrile nature, and advanced so rapidly that, in twelve days, it was thought proper to announce to him his imminent danger. On the 30th of November he became senseless, and died the following morn- ing in the arms of the empress. It has been said that he was poisoned, but there is not the shadow of proof for such an assertion. The manners of Alexander were ex- tremely afiable, and his person was agreeable. The facts detailed in the pre- ceding sketch will better enable the reader to judge of his character than any la- boured description. He has been ac- cused of concealing much dissimulation, under an air of great frankness, but these accusations are more easily made, than they can be either "proved or dis- proved. Napoleon, whom he deceived, said of him at St. Helena, " He is a Greek of the Lower Empire ; it is neces- sary to distrust him:" but on such a point, the evidence of an inveterate enemy is not the most convincing. He neglected his empress at a very early period of their union, and in his subse- quent attachments he was very fickle and capricious. M. Michaud, in the Suppl. to the Biog. Universelle, has emmierated a great many works which throw light ALE ALE on the biography of this sovereign. See also Heeren's Manual of Europ. State- System, vol. ii. ; and Danilefsky's Rus- sian Campaign of 1814. ALEXANDER, the English name of Wamsutta, an Indian chief He was son and successor of Massassoit (see the name), and being suspected of conspiracy against the English, was taken by sur- prise by Major Winslow, about the year 1662. Having fallen sick of a fever, he was allowed to return on a pledge to ap- pear at the next court, but he died on the way. (Allen's American Dictionary.) ALEXANDER, (William, died 1783,) commonly called Lord Stii-ling, a major- general in the American army. He was taken prisoner at Long Island in 1776, after distinguishing himself very much in the engagement. He was imable to make out his claim to the earldom of Stirling, but he received the title from his friends by courtesy. (Allen's Diet.) ALEXANDER, (Caleb, D. D.) gra- duated at Yale CoUege, 1777 ; was or- dained at New Marlborough, Mass., in 1781 ; and dismissed in 1782. He sub- sequently had the charge of the academy at Onandago Hollow, where he died in 1828. He published a work on the Deity of Jesus Christ, 1791, &c. (Allen's Diet.) ALEXANDRE, (1649 — 1718,) a painter of history and portraits, born at Paris. His family were of Polish origin, and named Ubeleski. He executed many works, but they are scarcely known out of France. He was a member of the Academie Royale. (Heinecken, Diet, des Artistes.) ALEXANDRINI DE NEUSTAIN, (Jidius,) a native of Trente, was suc- cessively physician to the emperors Charles V., Ferdinand I., and Maximi- lian II., the last of whom, whose health frequently required his attendance, be- stowed upon him many favours and ho- nours. He died in 1590, leaving behind him works in prose, which are chiefly commentaries on Galen. ALEXIAS, a physician, a pupil to Thraseas, of Mantinea, was a contempo- rary of Theophrastus, and therefore may be supposed to have flourished about B. c. 350, (01. cvii. 3.) He was a man of great talents and acuteness, equal to his master in knowledge of Botany, and supe- rior to him in other branches of the profes- sion. Theoph. Hist. Plant, lib. ix. c. 17. ALEXINUS OF ELIS, called by a play on his name EXty^ivos, Elenxinus, from his love of loirical, ov. as Cicero 293 says in Academ. iv. 24, illogical argu- mentation, opened a school of philosophy at Olympia, with the intention of found- ing the Olympic sect ; but he was quickly deserted by his scholars, unable to sup- port the insalubi'ity of the place. While bathing in the river Alpheus he was wounded with a reed, from the effect of which he died; so says Diog. lib. ii. 109. But how an aquatic plant could inflict a fatal wound, it is difficult to understand. It is more probable to suppose that he was drowned by the reeds twisting round his body, and drawing him un- der the water. If such were tlie fact, we nnist read in Diogenes eXix^rivai, for vvxdi]vai. He seems to have abused all sects equally. Aristocles (De Philosopb. vii.) quoted by bishop Lloyd, says that he wrote Facetious Memoirs, in which he supposed a conversation to take place between Alexander and Philip, where the son found fault with his father for giving him such an insti^uctor as Ari- stotle, whom Alexander, as we learn from Plutarch's Life, § 74, accused of acting like the philosopher in Hudibras, who— " Could take each side, and still confute." He wrote a hymn on Cratenis of Mace- don, to which Athenaeus alludes (xv. p. 696, E). ALEXION, the friend and physician of Cicero, who praises his medical skill, and deeply laments his sudden death. Epist. ad Att. vii. 2 ; xiii. 25 ; xv. 1, 2. ALEXIPPUS, a physician mentioned by Plutarch, in his life of Alexander the Great (p. 689, a. ed. Paris, 1624), as receiving a letter of thanks from the king himself, for having cured Pencestes, one of his officei's. ALEXIS, (1630 — 1676,) tsar of Russia, was the second monarch of the Romanof dynasty (see Michael Ro- manif), which in 1613 succeeded to the extinct I'ace of Ruric. On his father's death (1645), Alexis was only in his sixteenth year ; he was therefore confided to the care of a mini- ster and tutor, named Morosof, — a man of considerable talent, and of greater am- bition. Many of this boyard's measures were popidar ; but his inordinate love of power soon made him enemies. To maintain his authority, he married the sister of the tsarina ; but this connexion with the imperial family was precisely one of the circumstances that led to his downfal, since it raised the jealousy of the nobility. Whether through his fault or by his misfortune, the administration ALE ALE of justice became very corrupt ; but in either case, he is more deserving of blame than of indulgence. If he did not create, he certainly connived at the cor- ruption ; and there is reason to infer that he profited by it. Add to this the im- position of extraordinary taxes, and we shall not be sm-prised at the murmurs which arose on every side against this minion of fortune. Mvurmurs were suc- ceeded by open complaints ; and the latter, by petitions to the tsar, exposing intolerable wrongs, and calling aloud for punishment. None of these representa- tions reached the eyes of Alexis, the avenues to whom were carefully closed by the all-powerfid minister. At length the people of Moscow assailed the mo- narch as he returned from church, and in such a manner as convinced him that there was some deep cause of complaint. He inqiured and punished; but, as is usual in such cases, the chief, or at least the most powerful criminal, escaped. Morosof was only dismissed, but infeinor delinquents were put to death. To this act of justice Alexis was reluctantly forced by the mob, which in despotic governments has always the most power. In other cities, especially Pskof and No- vogrod, there were disturbances arising from the same cause ; but they were quelled with less difficulty. Under this monarch, Russia made large strides towards greatness. Her territorial accessions in the Ukraine were immense, and were owing to the tyranny of the Polish government, on which that fertile region was then dependent. For ages the Cossacks, its inhabitants, had acknowledged the superioritj' of the Po- lish diet ; but the tyranny of the local governors was felt to be intolerable. One of the chiefs, Bogdan Kmielniski (see the name), had individual, in addition to greater wrongs, for which vengeance was due. He had a mill and a domain which attracted the avarice of the Polish gover- nor. To obtain this property, the go- vernor brought some fi-ivolous accusa- tions against Bogdan before the tribunal of the province. When these charges were rejected, the tyrant seized on all he coveted. In vain did the injm-ed chief appeal to the diet; he could not obtain a hearing. Indignant at the result, he went to obtain allies among the neigh- bouring Tartars. During his absence his wife was violated, then murdered, and his house with his infant son con- sumed by fii-e. His WTongs were more eloquent than his language ; Cossacks, as 294 well as Tartars, arose in his behalf; and at the head of one hundred thousand men, he advanced against the Poles. Two of their armies he almost annihi- lated ; and the peasants, alike of the Polish nobles and crown, he made cap- tive. Much of his success must be attri- buted to the interregnum, which preceded the election of John Casimir to the throne. That monarch, immediately after his elec- tion, began to treat with hiin ; but in the midst of the negotiations, the Tartar camp was surprised, and the imsus- pecting people slaughtered. This act of perfidy filled the soul of Bogdan with gall. He retreated to collect fresh troops ; and at the same time he ap- plied to Alexis for aid : in return, he proposed to become the vassal of the monarch, and to bring the whole Cos- sack nation under the sway of the auto- crat. The offer was a tempting one to the tsar ; but its acceptance must entail no ordinary responsibility. Was it the will of Heaven that he should embrace the cause of the deeply-injured appli- cant ? To ascertain this important point, he caixsed two bulls, the one named Poland, the other Moscovy, to oppose each other ! Moscovy was vanquished ; and the tsar woidd have declined the offer of Bogdan, had not the patriarch convinced him that it was his duty to succour those of his own religious com- munion, viz. the members of the Greek church, against their Roman Catholic persecutors. War, therefore, was de- clared. Smolensko, Witepsk, Polotsk, Mohilof, Severin, Semigallia, and other important places, fell before the Russians, while Bogdan, at the head of his Cos- sacks, reduced others no less important on the Moldavian frontier. At these successes, Sweden, which had always urged her claims to Livonia, took the alarm ; but instead of opposing Russia, she resolved to conquer other Pohsh domains, before the armies of Alexis could penetrate to the west. With the events of the Swedish war, we have, in the present article, no concern ; and we shall only observe, that at the peace, the whole country between Courland and Moscovy was surrendered to Alexis. Besides this acquisition, there was the vast territory, which the submission of Bogdan brought to the empire of the tsar, viz. that between the Lake Ilmen, and the Black Sea. Alexis Avas not exempt from the curse of internal rebellion. The Cossacks of the Don, indignant at the tyranny of ALE A h V. their local governors,revolted against him, just as those of the Ukraine had revolted against Poland. No less than two hun- dred thousand men rose to vindicate their rights. But most of these were moved by imaginary grievances, and by the deceptions of Radzin their chief. The insurrection was at length quenched in the blood of Radzin, and twelve thou- sand of his followers. In his internal administration, Alexis was also fortunate ; he improved the judicial functions of government ; and he flattered the pride, not merely of the boyards, but of the biu-ghers, by considt- ing them on extraordinary occasions. He not only enlarged the bounds of the empire, but consolidated its power. Pri- soners of war he would no longer permit to remain under the control of the cap- tors : he sent them to colonize the unin- habited disti-icts. He was the first of the Russian sovereigns who constructed ships of war. If we add that he was of a mild and even amiable disposition, we should have said enough m his praise. Yet, how fatal is despotism to the heart ! This emperor, who never punished any body until he was forced to do so, was subject to strange fantasies. An anecdote will illustrate his character, or rather the cha- racter of all men who are accustomed to unbounded power. He was one day bled by his surgeon. No sooner was the opei'ation completed, than he invited the surrounding courtiers to follow his ex- ample. All consented except one, an old man, whose quantity of blood was little enough already. Though this ve- nerable man was allied to the imperial family, Alexis grossly abused, and then struck him. But his better feeling re- turned, and he offered the boyard rich presents. Another anecdote will illustrate the character of Russian autocracy. Alexis was very familiar with his dependents, and often used to pay them unexpected visits. One day he entered the house of Matveef, a courtier, just as the dinner cloth was laid ; and he insisted in dining with the family. Present was a young lady, Natalia by name, a kins- woman of Matveef, and so poor as to be dependent on him for a home. Her beauty, her accomplishments, her mo- desty, made her captivating in the eyes of the tsar. Again he saw her, and the first impression was deepened. At length he determined to marry her. Instead of rejoicing at the proposal, Matveef trem- bled at it. He well knew what enemies 29.5 the regard of his sovereign had already procured him ; and he also knew that the number would be increased by the medi- tated imion. However, as there was no way of dissuading the tsar from the pro- ject, he suggested the expediency of calling together a considerable number of young ladies, and of making his choice from them. If that choice were already fixed, the world would not know it. Alexis followed the advice, and Natalia was selected. She became the mother of Peter the Great. We must add, that in the time of peace, Alexis maintained a standing army of one hundred thousand men, which he more than doubled in time of war; and that he welcomed military adventurers from all nations, especially from France, Germany, and Scotland. (Levesque, Histoire de Russie, torn. iv. ; Tooke's History, vol.ii. ; History of Rus- sia, vol. i. ; Lardner's Cyclopaedia.) ALEXIS, (1690—1718,) the tsaro- vitcb, son of Peter the Great. As the fate of this prmce, independent of its connexion with the founder of Russian civilization, is not only extraordinary in itself, but involves one of the most contro- verted problems in history, we shall dwell on it at some length. We need scarcely observe, that its interest is European, and tliat it has occupied a hundred pens. The facts of this prince's life prior to its closing scene are, on all hands, allowed to be indisputable. His mo- ther, Eudoxia (see the name), the first vnk of Peter, was of an ancient noble house, and taught alike by prejudice and habit to hate the innovations of her husband. If she dared not oft'er an active, she knew how, by her in- trigues, to interpose in passive resistance to his reforms. Her conduct coidd not escape his penetration ; he saw that she would never be his helpmate in the vast projects he was executing ; and in about nine years after his marriage, he exiled her to a monastery. In her retreat, she was regarded by the old party as a martyr to their ancient institutions. If Alexis, at this period, was too yoimg to be in- fluenced by her maxims, he was subjected to an influence similar in kind, and quite as fatal. His governors, his domestics, were secretly attached to the former re- gime. Hence his aversion, which he did not always conceal, to the policy of his father. In other respects, he was no favourite of the tsar's. He hated study ; he hated military duty ; he hated acti- vity in any shape. As he grew in ALE ALE years, he plunged into the worst vices of his age. To reclaim him from one at least, a wife was found him in a princess of Brmiswick - Wolfenbuttel, a lady of great virtues, and of an affectionate dis- position. But he forsook her society for that of a Finnish concuhine, of low ex- traction, and very illiterate; and treated ]\ev, in other respects, with so much cruelty, that a broken heart, much more than a delicate constitution, brought her to the grave in little more than two years after her ill-starred union. She left a daughter and a son, — Nat alia, and Peter, who afterwards succeeded to the throne. The behaviour of Alexis to this excel- lent princess had naturally incurred the displeasure of the tsar. In vain had he exhorted him to reform ; to forsake his guilty connexion with his Finnish para- mour ; to cherish one whose qualities well deserved his attentions. In vain too had he remonstrated, earnestly and frequently remonstrated, with him on his other vices. The state of his feelings is well described in the letter which, im- mediately after the death of the princess, he addressed to the tsarovitch. He first dwells on the utter disregard which Alexis had shown to the military profes- sion ; yet by arms alone could the inde- pendence of any people be preserved. If a king had no knowledge of that pro- fession, how could he reward the skilful, how punish the ignorant officer? He then proceeds to complaints of his obsti- nacy, his depravity, and his wanton ex- cesses. The conclusion is sufficientlj- admonitory : " It is high time to acquaint you with my final resolution. I will wait some time longer for your amendment. If j'ou remain incorrigible, I will cut you off from the succession, just as we cut off an incurable member. Though you are my only son, do not suppose that I say this merely to frighten you. If I spare not my own life for the good of my coimtry, and the happiness of my people, why shoidd I spare yours, if you are undeserving of it? Much sooner would I bequeath the empire to an entire stranger, if he Avere deserving of it, than to my own son, if undeserving ? " Thus spoke the enlightened monarch, the ardent patriot. What was the reply of the prince ? He at once expressed his intention to resign a crown, for which he acknowledged his unfitness, (in the in- terim another son was borne to the tsar by the empress Catherine ;) and he re- quested onlv a provision for Jiis children 29G — (those by his mistress, Euphrosina, since the two by his deceased wife were sure to be well provided for) ; and a siut- able maintenance for himself. This re- ply cUd not satisfy the tsar ; it expressed no conti'ition for past misconduct ; it promised no reformation ; and it was evidently dictated as much by spleen as by fear. He wrote again in terms still sti-onger : "I observe that you speak only of the succession, as if this were a subject which did not entirely depend on my own will, and one in which it were necessary for me to consult you. You say not a word of my dissatisfaction at your conduct, though that dissatisfaction was the principal subject of my letter. I therefore perceive that my patient ex- hortations are lost on you, yet I write once more. If you despise my advice while I am alive, what reason have I to tliink that you will respect it when I am dead ?....! cannot leave you to your caprice. Reform ; become worthy of the throne ; or retire into a monastery. Through you I have no longer any peace ; and this I feel the more now that my health is giving way. As soon as you receive my letter, return me a categorical answer, either by writing or in person ; otherwise I shall deal with you as a criminal ! " To this decisive letter Alexis replied ; but still he ex- pressed no sorrow for his past miscon- duct : he merely intimated that he had made his choice, and should enter the cloister. To avoid WTiting a long letter, he feigned indisposition, and kept his bed. There he was visited by the tsar, who was about to visit Germany, and who conversed with him on the resolu- tion he had formed, — on the duties of the state he wished to embrace, — duties which seemed alien enough from his past conduct. At the close of the inter- view, he gave him six months longer before a final decision would be re- quired, and immediately went out upon his journey. The conduct of Alexis after the de- parture of his father sufficiently con- firmed the forebodings concerning him. He instantly rose from his bed, to cele- brate his indecent orgies with his low companions. He suftered seven months to elapse, yet wrote not a line to the ab- sent emperor. In much anger, Peter wrote from Copenhagen (Aug. 27, 1716), to complain of the delay. If he had de- cided on reformation, he must repair to Copenhagen in one week, and join in the campaign which he was about to ALE ALE open. If, on the contrary, he was still iletermined to assume the cowl, he must name the monastery to which he would retire, and the day on which he would take the irrevocahle vows. He now de- cided that he would join the tsar; pro- cured money from Menzikoff (see the name) ; andwithasviitableretinuetookthe way towards Germany. On the borders of Poland, however, he suddenly abandoned his route, and proceeding to Vienna, demanded the protection of the emperor Charles VL Charles, who had no wish to embroil himself with the Russian court, assigned him a fortress in the T3T0I, until a reconciliation could be effected between him and his father ; but without waiting for the result, he left his hiding-place, and proceeded to a fortress in the kingdom of Naples. There he addressed two letters to the senate and clei-gy of Moscow, represent- ing himself as the victim of ill-usage, and inviting their assistance. But they never reached their destination ; they were intercepted by the Austrian com't, and forwarded to the tsar. Great was the dismay of Peter on learning the evasion of his son : all his cares, all his perils, all he had done and suffered for so long a period, would be lost, imless he could regain the imdutiful prince. For this purpose he determined to promise any thing ; and he at the same time determined to destroy him, when again in his power. Two of his confidants, men ready to act as his in- struments in any affair, repaired to the tsarovitch, with a letter (July 10, 1717) characteristic enough of the writer. Hav- ing reproached him for his misconduct, and for his placing himself under the protection of a foreign power, he com- manded him to obey Tolstoy and Ro- manzoffin everything; he promised, if his son would obey, to love him better than ever; but if he would not, to treat him like a traitor. The promise and the threat woidd probably have been equally unavailing, had not the two messengers (the one a privy-councillor, the other an officer of the imperial guard) bribed Euphrosina, the mistress of the prince, to use her influence over him. Yielding to the voice of all three, to the oath of his father, and to the intervention of the Neapolitan viceroy, that his presence could no longer be tolerated in that country, he returned to Russia, which he reached in January 1718. What follows is momentous enough. Immediately the city of Moscow was filled 297 with troops under arms ; the issues were strictly guarded ; the great bell was tolled ; and the boyards, privy councillors, and senators, were assembled in the fortress ; while the bishops, archimandrites, the dig- nified clergy, and the professoi-s of divinity, repaired to the cathedral. Before the foi*- mer Alexis was conducted a prisoner, and by his father promised forgiveness only on two conditions : first, that he should re- nounce tlie hope of succession ; next, that he should declare who had been the ac- complices to his flight, and to his projects against the new order of things. After so solemn a pledge of pardon, this proceed- ing was strange to the tsarovitch ; but he was in the power of the despots, and he had no alternative but obedience. Indeed, by the Russian law the power of life and death was invested in a parent over his child ; how much more then the power of disinheriting ! Alexis signed the instru- ment of renunciation. He confessed on the holy gospels that by his crime against his sovereign and father, he had justly forfeited all claim to the succession : he therefore swore by the most Holy Trinity, and by the last judgment, that he would in all things submit to his father's will ; that he would never seek, or desire, or even accept the throne if offered to him. In conclusion, he acknowledged his bi-o- ther the tsarovitch, Peter, as the only lawful heir to the Russian sceptre. The assembled boyards and councillors swore to enforce the observance of the act. It was then taken by the emperor himself to the cathedral, and the same oath ex- acted from the heads of the church. The same oath too was afterwards taken by the army, and by all the functionaries of the administration. But only half the business was yet effected : l3efore Alexis could hope for pardon, he must reveal the names of those who at any time had encouraged him in his designs. That he had confi- dants, that he had advisers, is exceedingly probable ; — to him indeed the old party looked for the i"estoration of the ancient order of things ; — but there is- no e^ddence that any one had ever wished him to dis- obey his sovereign, during whose life no change could be expected : he was to wait imtil he had succeeded to the throne before he could undo any one of his father's labours. So far he might have, and probably had, advisers ; and in the opinion of the tsar, this was quite enough, for, as he observed, whosoever was not for him was against him. The prince was still kept a close prisoner ; menaces of an ALE ALE extreme kind, even of death, were held out to hhn if he concealed any thing; and from his mistress, who had betrayed him throughout, and who was now his accuser, sufficient was collected to impli- cate a few of the nobles. Discouraged by confinement, weak in body, weaker still in mind, he, when summoned, as he repeatedly was, before the secret tribu- nal which had been nominated to try him, and at which the tsar sometimes presided, he confessed every thing that he was desired to confess. The acts of pi-ocedure on the occasion, the means adopted to ensnare him, the forcible con- struction put on events in themselves of no great moment, would fill many sheets. The two letters which he had addressed from Austria to the senators and dignified clergy, were the most important of the documents produced ; yet though they certainly convicted him of imprudence, and even of criminal ivislies, they oifered nothing tangible enough for the purposes of justice. Mere report, — mere hear- say, — was next adduced in evidence, and with better effect ; for here indeed was a copious source of accusation. He had been heard to declare, perhaps in a fit of anger, " I will speak to the bishops, and they to the priests, and the priests to the people, and by them I shall be placed on the throne even against my will." This was vague ; and all that could be inferred from it was that if he indulged in ana- bitious projects, he took no measures to realize them. Again, his mistress Euphro- sina deposed that he had frequently ex- pressed his dissatisfaction with his father, and wished for his death. Tliat the wish was expressed, is probable ; but surely it did not amount to treason ; and it might be accompanied by some palliating ob- servations which she forgot to mention. And should not the evidence of such a woman have been received with distrust 1 But whoever coidd depose any thing which ingenuity might turn against the unfortunate pi-ince, was readily received by the tsar. That his destruction was resolved, was clear from the whole course of the investigation, and from the treat- ment which he received the moment he reached Moscow. The persons to whom Peter confided the conduct of that inves- tigation were no less ready to condemn him. They had gone too far to hope for pardon from Alexis, should he ever suc- ceed his father, and their only safety lay in his death ; hence they sedulously fo- mented the displeasure of one who had never loved his son, whose severity was 298 proverbial, and whose suspicions were too strongly excited to leave him in peace so long as that son lived. To procure more evidence against the vmfortunate, imprudent, and in some respects guilty Alexis, his confessor was required to be- tray the secrets of that tribimal, and when he refused, was put to the torture. In the extremity of pain he owned that Alexis had accused himself of wishing his father's death, and that he (the priest) had assured the prince, this was no great sin, for the whole Russian nation wished the same. This is perhaps the first instance in all history where the con- fessional has been adduced as a judicial proof. In these proceedings many distin- guished names were comprised. The mother of Alexis, whom, as we have already intimated, the tsar had long repudiated, and whom he had con- signed to a monastery, was suspected, — perhaps with some justice, — of having counselled his flight. She detested her confinement ; and indulged, it is said, in profligate habits. She and the tsar's sister, the princess Mary, were brought fronr their convent to St. Petersburgh, together with the confessors of both, the procura- tor of the convent, the archbishop of Rostof, and some other persons accused of participation in the plot. Under the torture, the ecclesiastics admitted that for nine years Eudoxia had carried on a criminal intrigue with General Glebof. That there was some truth in this ap- pears from the confession of the lady herself, who threw herself upon the mercy of the tsar. But where torture is em- ployed, any confession may be obtained ; and we may doubt whether one half of the statements contained in the manifesto which the emperor published on the oc- casion had any real foundation. However this may be, he was resolved to take a sig- nal vengeance. Glebof was impaled alive, and the corpse laid on a scaffold in the cen- tre of the public square of Moscow. On a pole at each coi-ner of the scaffold were the heads of the tsarina's brother, of two bishops, and of a commissioner of the admii'alty. Many more — among them fifty priests and monks — were executed around them. The tsarina herself was flogged by two nuns, and confined in a monastic dungeon the rest of her days. Some other nims received the knout, and were imprisoned, or exiled into Siberia. These dreadful executions, and the dis- may which they produced throughout the city, — no inhabitant, under pain of death, ALE ALE being permitted to leave it, — destroyed what little reason was left in the mind of Alexis. Dragged repeatedly from his dungeon before his terrible father, he confessed every thing of which he was accused. When the proofs were consi- dered complete, Peter convoked a general assembly of his counsellors, senators, nobles (June 1718), and undertook in person the affair of public accuser of his son. Having dwelt on the vices of the prince, and showed how little the em- pire had to hope from such a man ; he observed, that though by the laws of Russia he, like the meanest of his people, had a right to pass sentence on his son, he would leave judgment to his coun- sellors, whose award would be perfectly unbiassed. He exhorted them to dis- charge this great duty without fear and without partiality. In a manifesto which he addressed to the dignitaries of the church he repeated the same statements, and called on them to say, from holy Scripture, what punishment his son might deserve. In both steps he was artful enough : the sentence, whatever it might be, would entail even more responsibi- lity on the chiefs of his people, or the nobles and bishops, than on himself. The clergy were the first to deliver their opinion. It was a remarkable docu- ment. It began by declaring that the affair did not lie within the cognizance of the ecclesiastical coiu-ts, but solely within the jurisdiction of the sovereign, who owed no responsibility to man, but to God alone. It then adduced passages from Scripture of an entirely opposite chai'ac- ter, some in favour of judgment, others of mercy, and left the decision to him- self. The church, therefore, would not interfere ; but so far as it could be said to have a bias, that bias was in favour of pardon, or at least of a slight punish- ment. The secidar judges were not so considerate : having weighed the evi- dence, and heard the confession of the criminal, that he was guilty of every thing laid to his charge, they uncere- moniously condemned him to death, with some expressions of sorrow indeed, but wholly affected. The following day the tsarovitch being again brought before his judges, again confessed the truth of all the charges, heard his sentence, and was reconveyed to his dungeon. Why did Alexis so readily, nay, so eagerly, confess all that was requu-ed? Doubtless, be- cause he had been assured that from such a step only could he hope for safety ; that his only alternative was to throw himself 299 on the mercy of his father, who at the worst would only send him to the cloister. He, like the whole empire, thought that the tsar could not, and would not, pro- ceed further. Neither he nor the empire knew that extraordinary man. In little more than twenty-four hours after the sentence had been read to him, Alexis had ceased to exist ! The current version of this catastrophe, — that which the tsar himself published, and with which European cabinets pro- fessed themselves satisfied, — is, that on the morning of Jidy 7th, Peter was informed tliat his son was dangerously ill, and wished to see him; that, accompanied by his chief officers, he hastened to the fortress where the prisoner was confined ; that the interview between them was affecting ; that Alexis begged for pardon, which the emperor, "according to christian and pa- ternal duty," granted; that some hours after his return to the palace, he was again informed by a messenger that the illness of his son had alarmingly in- creased; and that, while on his way to pay a second visit to the couch of the tsarovitch, he met another messenger, with the tidings that the prince had ceased to exist. If courts were, as they professed to be, satisfied with tliis version of the story, the world in general was not. The vin- dictive character of Peter ; the fondiress witli which he contemplated reforms that had cost him a whole life of incredible efforts ; his apprehension lest all those efforts should prove vain ; the apprehen- sions, too, of the courtiers, lest one whom they had offended beyond the hope of pardon, should one day become their master ; and above all, the few hours that intervened between the sentence and the death of Alexis ; led most people to sus- pect that the event was tragical. Many pretended to have a better foundation than probability for the catastrophe, and entered into details which, had they been uniformly given, might have demanded our attention. But no two versions of the story were alike : they differed widely in the incidents, and even in the characters. One account says that the prince was poisoned by order of Catherine, his step- mother ; and another, by the hand of the tsar. That writer asserts that he was beheaded by Marshal Weyde ; this, that Peter himself was the executioner. It was indeed notorious, that after his death the corpse of the victim was exposed for some time to the public ; but then the head had been so dexterously sewn to ALE ALE tlie body again, that nobody could detect the deed. Such rumours, however high the authority which has adopted them, are too idle to deserve refutation. So far was Catherine from lu-ging her husband to extreme measures in regard to the prince, that she urgently dissuaded him from them. She observed, that seclusion in a monastery was a punishment severe enough for the occasion ; thid it would not only answer the ends of justice, but obtain the approval of all Europe ; Avhile a contrary conduct might have conse- quences too serious for the repose of the court, and even of the empire. But while condemning the absurdity of the rumours to which we have alluded, it must be admitted, that strong evidence has been adduced to show that he died by poison, administered at the instance of his father. The statement of Captain Bruce, an officer in the Russian service, one ardently attached to the tsar, and an eye-witness (one might almost say an actor) in the last scene of the prince's life, is of a very decisive character. While Peter, Marshal Weyde (to whom Bruce was aid-de-camp), and other of- ficers, were in the ante-chamber of Alexis, the very day on which he died, " Marshal Weyde came out," says the captain, " and ordered me to go to Mr. Bear, the drug- gist, whose shop was hard by, and tell him to make the potion strong which he had bespoke, as the prince was then very ill. When I delivered this message to Mr. Bear, he turned quite pale, and fell a shaking and trembling, and appeared in the utmost confusion, which surprised me so much that I asked him what was the matter with him ; but he was unable to return me any answer. In the mean time the marshal liimself came in, much in the same condition with the druggist, saying he ought to have been more ex- peditious, as the prince was very ill of an apoplectic fit. Upon this the druggist delivered him a silver cup with a cover, which the marshal himself carried into tlie prince's apartment, staggering all the way as he went like one drunk. About half an hour afterwards the tsar, with all his attendants, withdrew, w'ith very dis- mal countenances ; and when they went, the marshal ordered me to attend at the prince's apartments, and in case of any alteration to inform him immediately thereof. There were, at that time, two physicians and two surgeons in waiting, with whom, and the officers on guard, I dined on what had been dressed for the prince's dinnei-. The physicians were r,oo called in immediately after to attend the prince, who was struggling out of one couAidsion into another ; and after great agonies, expired at five o'clock in the afternoon." To estimate the degi-ee of credit due to this relation, we nmst attend to the circumstances of the relator.* He was, as we have already observed, a great ad- mirer and sincere panegyrist of the tsar. On this transaction, indeed, he makes no comment ; and how could he ? He evidently believes his imperial master guilty of the crime, the motive for which, — a desire to rescue Russia from restored barbarism,^ — -he almost thinks ought to atone for the deed. He writes what justice compels him to write, and with evident reluctance. To the tsar he owed every thing : gratitude, therefore, no less than admiration, woidd have led him to vindicate that extraordinary man from any unjust charge. In other parts of his work he does vindicate Peter from injus- tice ; in all he is eager to display his subject in the most favourable light. To this testimony we cannot refuse consi- derable weight. Posterity, therefore, must continue to believe in the guilt of the emperor until some evidence, formal and decisive as that of Bruce, fix it on another delin- quent. But no such evidence is likely to be adduced. There cannot, we think, be a reasonable doubt on the subject. Indeed, Peter himself was more than once heard to declare, that he had sacrificed his son to his patriotism, to a stern sense of duty. (Levesque, Histoire de Russie, tom. v. Mottley, History of the Life of Peter the First. Nestesu- ranoi, Memoires du Regne de Pierre le Grand. Voltaire, Histoire de Pierre le Grand. Memoirs of Peter Henry Bruce, Esq. (1782). Archdeacon Coxe, Travels in Russia. History of Russia, vol. ii. Lardner's Cabinet Cycl.) ALEXIS, of Thurium in Italy, from whence he went to Athens, floiu-ished as a comic writer about 363 e. c. He was the uncle of Menander. and wrote nearly two hundred and fifty plays. The titles of more than one hundred and ten have been preserved, and fragments of them are to be found in the collections of Me- rellius, Hertclius, and Grotius. Some were translated by the comic writers of Italy, as we learn from A. Gell. (ii. 23). * There is, however, one circumstance to he considered— the improbability of making the che- mii-t a ccnfidant, if by " itrovg poiiun" indsun was inttndtd. LE AL£ He lived, s.iys Plutarch, (ii. p. 430, Xyl.) to nearly one hundred, and died, according to the same author, (ii. p. 785,) while in the very act of being crowned in a dramatic contest. He was the first, as it appears from Athenteus (vi. p. 235, F.) to introduce upon the stage the character of a parasite, fovmded probably on the flatterers of Eupoly. ALEXIS, of Samos, a prose ethical writer, of whom nothing is known, ex- cept through two quotations in Athenreus. ALEXIS (Guillaume), svunamed ' Le Bon Moine,' was a Benedictine monk of the abbey of Lyre, in the diocese of Evreun. The dates of his birth and decease are unknown, but he was living in 1505. He was the author of many works of much naivete and merit, though now little read. The chief of these are — 1. Le Grant Blason des Faulces Amours. Paris, 1493 ; often reprinted. 2. Le Passe- temps de tout Homme et de toute Femme, avec I'A B C des doubles, le tout en vers. Paris, 4to, without date ; often reprinted. This is a kind of translation of a work De Vilitate Humanse Conditionis, attri- buted to Pope Innocent III., and was finished in 1480. It is chiefly on human misery, and recommending a contempt of the world. Alexis, in 1486, was at Jerusalem, and there composed his Dia- logue du Crucifix et du Pelerin. Paris et Rouen, 4to, s. d. He returned to France, and publishlu other works ; although the Contre Blason des Faulces Amours states, that he was put to death at Jerusalem by the infidels. (Biog. Univ.) ALEXIS DEL ARCO. See Arco. ALEXIS, a Piedmontese, the reputed author of a book of " Secrets," printed at Basil, 1536, 8vo, which has been fre- quently translated into French, and, in- deed, into every European language : an abridgement of them was long a popular book at foreign fairs. Haller says, that the real name of this avithor was Hiero- nymo Rosello. ALEXIUS I. (Comnenus,) emperor of Constantinople, born in 1048; com- menced his military career under his brother Isaac, in the imfortimate expe- dition of the latter against the Turks. As a reward for his services in the in- terior of the empire, the emperor Michael afterwai'ds married him to Irene, grand- daughter of John Ducas. Under the succeeding emperor Nicephorus Boto- niates, he was also successful in suppress- ing various insuiTections ; and his talents and good fortune excited the envy of the 301 ministers of state, who, in council as- sembled, decreed his destruction. Warned of his danger, he quickly left the capital ; betook himself to the army ; was there joined by the nobility of Constantinople, and by the Csesar John Ducas, and pro- claimed emperor in 1081. His fii'st step now was to march upon the capital, which he surprised, and gave up to such a hor- rible pillage by his soldiers, that he was afterwards obliged to do public penance, in order to remove the odium which the cruelties committed on his entrance into Constantinople cast upon him. Sur- rounded by factious and ambitious chiefs, Alexius was obliged to create a number of new dignities in order to satisfy his rivals, his relations, and his partisans. From abroad, he was menaced on the one hand by the Turks, and on the other by Robert Guiscard, son of Tancred de Hauteville, who surrounded Dyrrachium with his army, and whom, but not be- fore he had himself suffered a defeat at his hands, he compelled to return into Italy. The Scythians, too, of whom an innumerable multitude passed the Da- nube, and ravaged Thrace, he succeeded in entirely defeating, after an arduous struggle. He next overthrew Tzachas, who, at the head of a body of Turks, had taken Mytilene, and several other cities, and had declared liimself independent. He now promised himself repose, but had scarcely sheathed his sword, when the first crusaders arrived, in 1096, now demanding his aid, and now insulting him in his own palace, and finally forcing him to join them. This alliance was not of long duration ; a war soon broke out between the cnisaders and the emperor, in which the latter was successful. He died in 1118, after a reign of thirty-seven years. Historians have portrayed his character in very different colours ; his daughter, Anna Comnena, who wrote his life, seeks to justify his whole conduct. ALEXIUS II. (Comnenus,) emperor of Constantinople, born in that city in 1168, was at first under the tutelage of his mother, and afterwards under that of Andronicus Comnenus, who married him to his daughter Irene ; and after having caused himself to be associated with him in the government, declared him inifit for its duties. After having borne the title of emperor for three years, this vmfortunate prince was assassinated by order of the perfidious usiu-per, in 1183. ALEXIUS III. (Angelus,) emperor of the East, usurped, in 1 195, the sceptre ALE ALE of his brother Isaac, whose eyes he put out, and whom he kept in captivity. But he did not obtain a tranquil posses- sion of power. The people were inimical to his family; and the empire was at- tacked on one side by the Turks, and on another by the Bulgarians ; whilst the coasts were infested with pirates. The empress Euphrosyna attempted, but with- out success, to remedy the evils caused by the weakness of the emperor : the revolts and invasions increased. In 1203, an army of crusaders, who had espoused the cause of the young Alexis, son of the supplanted Isaac, appeared before Con- stantinople. The emperor, devoted to pleasure, and the victim of his own ex- cesses, had made no preparations for defence. Lascaris, his general, who at- tempted to dispute the passage of the Bosphorus, was defeated ; and the Latins, though comparatively few in number, commenced the siege of the city. They finally entered it by means of a general assault : a desperate struggle was' main- tained in the streets. At night-fall the event seemed uncertain ; but the empe- ror, by the persuasion of his courtesans and flatterers, fled from the scene of danger to Zagora, a city of Thrace, thus abandoning his sceptre, his empress, and all his family, except his daughter Irene, whom he took with him. The unfortu- nate Isaac was now delivered from prison, and it was he who received his son in Constantinople. Alexius made some at- tempts to recover his throne, and ad- vanced with an army as far as Adi'ianople ; but his eflbrts, which he continued to repeat during the next seven years, were none of them crowned with success. He terminated a life, dishonoured by odious vices and shameful cowardice, in a mo- nastery of Nice, where he was confined by Theodore Lascaris. ALEXIUS IV. (the Young,) empe- ror of Constantinople, was the son of Isaac Angelus, who was dethroned and depi'ived of his sight by Alexius III. The weakness of his character, the sub- sidies which he was compelled to levy in oi'der to satisfy the Latins, by whose means Alexius III. was driven from Constantinople (see Alexius III.), and himself placed on the throne, and the favour which he showed these allies, incensed the Greeks against him. He was at length thrown into prison by his perfidious favourite, Alexius Ducas, sur- named Murzuphle, who after having twice attempted to poison him without success, strangled him, after they had 302 dined together in his dungeon, Feb. 8, 1204, and then broke his bones with a club, in order to make it be believed that he had killed himself by a fall. Alexius only reigned six months ; during which time he manifested none of the qualities which are requisite in a ruler. ALEXIUS V. emperor of Constan- tinople, surnamed Murzuphle, was of the illustrious family of Ducas. (See Gibbon, ch. Ix.) He ascended the throne, after he had assassinated Alexius IV. (see Alexius IV.) He sought to conciliate the favour of the Latin chiefs, but the negotiations were broken off" (see Gib- bon) ; and they determined on the par- tition of the empire of the East On tlie 9th of April, 1204, they attacked Con- stantinople. The Greeks, animated by Alexius, and covered by excellent forti- fications, made a vigorous defence ; but a second more determined assault having been made, Alexius fled from his capital, taking with him the treasures of his pa- lace, and accompanied by Euphrosyna, wife of Alexius III. and her daughter Eudocia, whom he had married, though he had already two wives. He fled to Thrace to his father-in-law, Alexius, who received him kindly, but shortly after- wards caused his eyes to be torn out, and deserted him. Murzuphle now attempted to pass into Asia, but was arrested and carried before Baldwin I. emperor of the East, who causei^ him to be tried by his barons for having murdered liis sove- reign. He defended himself with bold- ness ; but was condemned to be precipi- tated from the column which the great Theodosius had erected at Constanti- nople ; and this sentence was executed in the year 1204. ALEXIUS, surnamed the Impostor, in the reign of Isaac Angelus, sought to profit by some resemblance which he bore to Alexius II. in order to pass for the son of Manuel Comnenus. At the head of 8000 men, he caused himself to be proclaimed emperor, and ravaged the country bordering on the Meander. An Asiatic priest, incensed at the sacrileges committed by his undisciplined soldiers, who were for the most part Mussulmans, entered into his chamber one day, when he was stupified with wine, and slew him with a sword, which they found suspended at the head of his bed. (This and the preceding sketches of Alexius, I. to V. are taken from the Bio- graphic Univ. See also Gibbon, vol. xi.) ALEXUS, or ALEXAS, of Ionia, a writer of indelicate poetry, and the pre- ALE A-LF (lecessor of Sotades, as we learn from Athenaeus (xiv. p. 620, E.) ALEYN, CHARLES, a poet in the reign of Charles L was of Sidney college, Cambridge ; became usher to the cele- brated Farnaby, at his school, in Gold- smith's Rents, and afterwards tutor to Sir Edward Sherburne, himself a poet. He died about 1640. His works are. The Battle of Crescey and Poictiers, 1632 ; the Historic of Hen. VH. with the famed battle near Bosworth, 1638 ; and the Historic of Eurialus and Lucretia, 1639, from a story in the Latin Epistles of iEneas Sylvius. Aleyn seems to have been much esteemed and beloved by co- temporaries of some eminence. To his first poem are prefixed commendatory verses in Latin, by Tliomas May, and in English, by John Hall and Henry Blount ; Sherburne and Edward Prideaux lent their names to the second. The poems are composed in stanzas of six lines — four alternate and two rhymes. A writer in the Britannica is very pro- fuse in praise of them, but his quotations will scarcely invite to a perusal of more. ALEYRAC. See Daleyrac. ALFANL (Domenico di Paris, 1483, was living in 1536,) a native of Perugia, and pupil of Pietro Perugino. Together with his son Orazio he executed the altar piece of the Crucifixion between St. ApoUonia and St. Jerome, at the church of the Conventuals at Perugia. Orazio di Paris Alfani, the son of Domenico, was born at Perugia, 1510, and was also a scholar of Perugino, and enlarged the style of that master. He studied the works of RafFaelle, and imitated them witli such exactness that many of his pictures have been mistaken for the pro- ductions of that great artist. Orazio was the chief of the academy for design, which was founded in his native city in 1573. He died in 1583.— (Lanzi, Stor. Pittor. ii. Bryan's Diet.) ALFARABI, so called from Farab, now Othrar, a town in Asia Minor, where he was bom, his real name being Moham- med, was of Turkish origin, but quitted his country, and studied the Aristotelian philosophy at Bagdad, and logic at Harran, under John, a christian physi- cian. After a visit to Egypt, he settled at Damas, where the prince Seif-ed-Dau- lah took him under his patronage. He excelled in music, as well as in philoso- phy and philology. He wrote many treatises on different parts of the Aristo- telian philosophy, and these were read and admired not only among the Ara- 303 bians, but also among the Jews. His treatise De Intelligentiis was published in the works of Avicenna, Venice, 1495 ; another, De Causis, is in Aristotle's works, with the commentaries of Aver- roes ; and his Opuscida Varia were printed at Paris in 1638. One of his most famous works is a kind of encyclo- predia, in which he gives a short account and definition of all branches of science and art : the manuscript of this is in the Escurial. This celebrated philosopher died in the year 950. ALFARO, (y Gamon, Don Juan dc, 1640 — 1680,) a Spanish painter, pupil of Antonio de Castile, and afterwards of Velasquez, whose style he adopted. He painted both portraits and history ; of the latter, his two most celebrated works are the Incarnation in the church of the Carmelites, and the Guardian Angel in the church of the Imperial college at Madrid. (Bryan's Diet.) ALFENUS, (Varus,) a celebrated Roman lawyer, was born in the year of Rome 713 at Cremona. He was at first a shoemaker under Servius Sulpicius, and raised himself by his talents and probity to the rank of consul. He was the first who made those collections of civil law called digests ; but none of his writings are now extant. ALFERGAN, (Ahmed- Ben -Kothair, or Moliammed-Ben-Ketei) Al Fergani, so called from Ferghanah a town of Sogdiana, his native place. He was a celebrated astronomer, and from his skill in calculations received the name of" The Calculator." The date of his birth and death are unknown — it is only known that he lived in the time of the Khalif-al- Mamoun, who died 833. He is the author of an Introduction to Astronomy, in thirty books, which was an abridgement of the Greek astronomy which then began to be studied by the Arabians. The num- ber of the stars is there made 1022, as in the Almagest — the obliquity of the eclip- tic is 23'= 35'. There are three later translations of this book : 1 . one by Johan- nes Hispalensis, made in the 12th cen- tury, printed at Ferrara 1493, and reprinted at Nunenburgh 153 7, with a pre- face by Melancthon ; 2. that of J. Christ- man 1590, from a Hebrew translation; and lastly, that of Golius in 1069. Alfer- gan wrote also on Solar Dials and on the Astrolabe. De Lambre speaks of his Introduction to Astronomy as a very superficial woi-k, and full of errors. — (Biog. Univ.) ALFES, (Isaac, 1013~n 03,) a native ALf A LF of a village near Fez, who took refuge in Spain, about 1088, in consequence of some troubles. He is the author of a commentary on the Talmud, called Al- fesi, from his name, and also The Little Talmud, from its being a compendium of that work. It has often been printed : at Constantinople, 1509 ; at Sabioneta, 1554, &c. (See de Rossi, Diz. Stor. et An- Titles &C.) ALFIERI, (Vittorio, 1749—1803,) is one of those men whose personal life would scarcely deserve notice, were it not for the celebrity which his works have acquired, although much of that celebrity may be traced to his adoption of what may be called the new opi- nions. He was born at Osti, in Pie- mont, of noble and affluent parents, and had the misfortune to lose his father ■when scarcely a year old. For some time he and his sister Giulia lived with his mother, who had married again ; but Giulia having been sent to a nunnery, he was placed under the tuition of a priest, fi-om whom he learnt the rudi- ments of the Latin language. It was imhappy for Alfieri that he was left without any companion at so early an age, and it probably exerted a very un- favourable influence on his character in after life. At the age of nine years, througli the interference of his uncle and guardian, Pellegrino Alfieri, he was sent to the academy -of Turin, and this was another great misfortune. Of the studies he pur- sued, and the education he received, he gives the most unfavourable account ; and it is almost inconceivable that such a system could have been adopted, and that the teachers should be so ignorant and so negligent. No maxims of mo- rality, no rules of conduct, were ever inculcated on the pupils ; nor do the pro- fessors appear to have been fitted to im- part them. His education here was miserable. At thirteen he studied philosophy and geo- metry in the morning, and logic in the afternoon ; but the lectures were in Latin, of which he knew scarcely any thing. As to geometry, having gone through six books of Euclid, he was unable to under- stand the fourth proposition of the first ! The lectures on logic must have presented a curious scene. " The students WTapped in their cloaks, fell soundly asleep, and the professor, only half-awake, drawled out his explanations in Latin, while the pupils now and then interrupted him by their snoring ! " 304 His removal to what was called the first apartment, then much frequented by young foreigners with little restraint, brought him into collision with the au- thorities, who confined him for three months. The marriage of his sister with count Cumana at length gave him liberty ; and having now attained the age of sixteen, which rendered him master of his pro- perty, he fell into all sorts of extravagant expenses. He now entered the army, with the rank of ensign, in a provincial regiment, which assembled for a few days twice in the year. At the age of seventeen, he obtained the king's leave to travel for a year under a tutor, whom he left at Naples, and coming back by way of Venice and Genoa, he went to Toulon and Mar- seilles, and reached Paris in August 1767, looking with the utmost indiffer- ence upon every thing he saw. In Paris the bad weather, the mean appearance of the buildings, the dirt of the streets, and the painted faces of the women, made upon him a sad and last- ing impression, and after a few months he came to England. From the first he was pleased with the country, whose ad- vantages seemed to him to " arise from the best of governments." But here, too, his restless and mad disposition soon made him dislike society, and instead of joining in parties like a gentleman, he preferred being a coachman, driving his friend by day through London, and wait- ing for him at night before the houses where he was passing his time, during the whole winter of 1 764. In the spring he went to Holland, where he engaged in an intrigvie with a married woman, which he followed with all his usual madness, and even attempted suicide. From Holland he ran to Italy, as usual admiring nothing — to Vienna, where he would not be introduced to Metastasio, because he had seen him perform the accustomed genuflexion to the empress Maria Theresa — to Prussia, where he looked upon Frederic the Great with horror — to St. Petersburgh, where he avoided the sight of the " philosophic Clytemnestra," as he calls Catherine — to Denmark, which he admired, because it was unlike Prussia — to Sweden, where he was delighted with the forests, frozen lakes, and mountains — and at last, tired of the north, he returned to England, leading everywhere a life of the most abominable profligacy. In London, in Spain and Portugal, A L F A L F and in Turin, he still continued his pro- fligate career ; and in the latter, after a severe illness, he wrote some scenes of Cleopati-a, which was his first essay in the Italian language. He next wrote two tragedies, Philip and Polinice, in French prose, the only language he knew ; and that too he only knew im- perfectly. To improve his Italian, or rather to learn it, he went to Tuscany, and in Florence he made the acquaint- ance of the lady who fixed him for ever. This was Louisa, daughter of the prince Stolberg Goedern, so well kno^vn as the countess of Albany, and wife of Charles Edward Stuart, called the young Pre- tender, whose character, coarse and ty- rannical, had obliged her to separate herself from liim, and retire to a convent in Rome, and afterwards reside with her brother-in-law, cardinal York. Alfieri, for the sake of enjoying her society, had no objection " to pay his court, and sub- mit to a thousand meannesses, to con- ciliate the good will of the priestlings, who interfered in her aifairs." He seems here to have forgotten that he had foi*- merly declined seeing Metastasio, be- cause he had paid the proper mark of respect to the Empress, in whose ser- vice he was. When the coimtess left cardinal York, Alfieri followed her where- ever she went; and after the death of her husband, in 1788, it is asserted by some that they were privately married, and by others denied. Be this as it may, there is no doubt that to this lady Alfieri owes the literary eminence which he afterwards attained. . In Sir J. C. Hob- house's illustrations of Childe Harold, the negative is very strongly maintained, p. 396. In the mean time he completed four- teen tragedies ; ten of which were pub- lished at Sienna. They were well criti- cized by Calsabigi, to whom he replied in a long letter, and came again to England to buy horses ; he then joined the countess in Paris, where he superin- tended the edition of his tragedies by Didot ; and soon after published his other miscellaneous works at Kehl, and continued to. live quietly with the coun- tess in Paris till the revolution drove them away, not without great personal danger, and the loss of all their property, under the plea that they were emigrants. Returning to Florence, he wrote his Misogallo, a collection of satirical sonnets, letters, and epigi'ams, in which he has embodied all his early dislike and recent detestation of the French people. At VOL. I. 305 the age of forty-six, he began to study the Greek language ; and without any assistance, in two years he was able to understand the Greek writers.* After- wards, he applied himself to Hebrew, and continued to live quietly in Florence, seeing nobody but the comitess and his friend, the Abate Caluso, till the year 1 803, when an attack of the gout, added to his constant application, and a worn- out constitution, put an end to his life. He was bm'ied in the chm-ch of Santa Croce, where the countess, who never left him in his last moments, had a fine monu- ment raised to him by the celebrated Canova. Such was the end of Alfieri — a melan- choly instance of a neglected education, and a wa}nvard and profligate disposition. Under due control, and with religious principles, he might have been a shining light ; but he is now only a beacon, to warn men against his errors and his vices. His works, indeed, have their admirers, but it is chiefly from the boldness of his views, and his attacks on the present order of things. Lord Byron, who in many respects resembled him, and who by analyzing his own sentiments, could very easily and tndy define those of Alfieri, says of him with much truth, — " Alfieri was an aristocrat at heart ; he preached liberty, because he coidd not bear con- ti'ol ; had he been a king, he would have been a tyrant." In regard to his merit as a tragic writer, his admirers and his enemies have both gone too far. G. Calsabigi, and A. W. Schlegel, in his course of dramatic literature, have criticized him very shai-ply. To the former Alfieri himself replied in a long letter ; to the latter, Gherardlni, in the notes to the Italian translation of his works, to which we refer our readers for further informa- tion. On the other hand, M. Sismondi has placed him by the side of the great tragic writers of France, and above those of all other nations ; and Mr. Forsyth agrees with him, and asks, " Where lives the tragic poet equal to Alfieri?" To tliis we beg leave to answer. Not in France, but in Germany, England, and Italy. Schiller, Goethe, and Joanna Baillie, and Monti, are all superior to Alfieri. In his ti-agedies, Alfieri has preserved the unities ; the characters are few ; the *■ Sir J. C. Hobhouse, however, (Hist. lUusfr. of Childe Harold, p. 33,) mentions a curious anec- dote, indicating that he obtained the assistance of a young scholar for this purpose. A LF A L F act'on is not internipted l)y midev-plots ; and the sentiments ai-e ex])ies.sed with an abruptness of lanji;^uage, which, though not always correct, does not fail to pro- duce a deep impression. By examining himself, he has been able to put the ex- pression of his own feelings into the mouth of his characters, and the conden- sation of his own passions is what ren- ders them so natural. He delineates all his characters, whether historical or ima- ginary, not as they are, but as he con- ceives them, according to the violence of his own temper and passion ; and this very violence fills the spectators, not with terror, but too often with disgust. The fact is, he was never deterred by the nature of the story, nor by its repug- nance to the feelings of mankind. Of this we have a striking example in his Myrrha, a subject so hateful, that though we may admire the skill with which it is treated, we can never lose the sense of disgust. In every point of view the sub- ject was injudicious : it is monstrous to the imlearned, for they understand no- thing of the pi'inciple by which it is mitigated ; and is offensive to the scholar, for the alterations introduced in a story so well known. In the same way in Brutus, he outrages alike our best feel- ings, our common sense, and historical truth ; and yet, from the licentious bold- ness of the opinions advocated in them, these two tragedies are the most admired by many of the modern school. Upon the whole, Saul is the best of his trage- dies, and the Filippo is perhaps the next to it in merit. One great merit of Alfieri consists in having avoided every sort of attack or sneer against religion and dece and -br— 6 ...ccncy : this merit would have been still more enhanced, if he had shown the same modei'ation in the history of his life, or rather, if he had not written it at all, for its tendency is abominable. Another great merit is the simplicity of his lan- guage, and the absence of all superfluous narrative. In the opening oi liis dramas, he generally is particularh' happy ; no- thing, for instance, can be compared with that of the " Ottavia." His minor works are several, and of various sorts. There are four comedies, which are satires on the different systems of government ; the Tirannide, which is a vehement invective against tyranny, in imitation of Macchiavelli's Principe, with this difference, that Macchiavelli de- scribed what he saw, and Alfieri what he chose to imagine ; an Apology for 30G Louis XVI. ; a translation of Sallust; a miscellaneous work, called the Antigal- lican, which we have already noticed; and his own Life, from which we have extracted the foregoing notice. His works have gone through many editions, both collectively and in parts. ALFIERI, (O.) of Asti, in Piedmont, wrote in the 13th century a history or chronicle of his coruitry, down to the year 1294, derived, according to his own account, from more ancient chronicles, which is inserted in the great collection of Muratori. (Script. Iler. Ital. vol. xi.) ALFIERI, (Count Benedict Innocent, 1700 — 1767) an architect and advocate of Asti, bom at Rome, was the author of the designs of the theatre, and several other buildings, at Turin. He was ai'chitect to King Charles Emanuel, with whom he was a great favourite. He furnished the plan for the beautifid facade of the tem- ple of St. Peter at Geneva. ALFONSO. On this name, which has been borne by so many kings of the Peninsrda, we must dwell at some length. For the sake of clearness, we arrange them under the heads of the states which they governed. 1. Kings of the Aslurias and Leon. Alfonso I,* (739 — 7.57,) was the son- in-law of Pelayo, the founder of the As- turian kingdom, and the third regal chief of the infant state, — his immechate suc- cessor being Favila, the son of Pela3'o. He was descended, we are told, from Leovigild, king of the Wisigoths : it ap- pears certain that in the reigns of Egica and Witiza he had distinguished himself by his military talents ; and that he was one of the most ardent supporters of the new state in the Asturias. For his valour, no less than for his royal birth, he was rewarded with the hand of Ermesinda, daughter of Pelayo. Both considerations, too, led to his election after the death of Favila ; for though this king left chil- dren, they were probably too young ; they were certainly deemed unequal to tiie duties of royalty at such a period. Among these rude mountaineers there was as little respect for the hereditary principle, as there had been among their Gothic sires ; the bravest chief was the most necessary, and therefore the most frequently chosen. It must, however, be observed, that the choice was always con- fined to the family of the reigning king, • It will be observed that this life widely differs from that given in the Biographie Universelle. The aiithors of that work have chiefly followe'J Mo- rales and Mariana, instead of Mondejar and Masdeu. AL F A L F and generally to the brother or son at his decease, provided he were not disquali- fied by age or infancy, by impotence of body or of mind. Alt'onso soon proved that he was worthy of their choice ; he became a conqueror ; and in that age the desire of conquest was a virtue. Lugo, Orense, and Tuy, in Galicia ; in Portugal, Braga, Oporto, Viseo, and Chaves ; in Leon, Astorga, Simancas, Zamora, Sala- manca, Ledesma, and the city of Leon ; in Castile, Avila, Sepulveda, Segovia, Osma, Coniila del Conde, Lara, and Sal- daiia, with some other places of less note, were rescued from the Mohammedans. When he ascended the throne, the limits of the new kingdom were restrained to the mountainous district surrounding the capital, Cangas de Onis ; but he extended it from the Biscayan Sea to the confines of Toledo ; and from the bordei-s of Ga- licia in the west, to those of Arragon in the east. If many of these possessions were lost by his successors, the fault was not his. But with all his conquests he did not remove his capital from Cangas, though he sometimes resided at Oviedo, and occasionally in other towns, for the more easy administration of justice. Can- gas was the strongest place ; and he had no wish to expose the seat of govern- ment to the perpetual inroads of the Arabs. The worst feature of his character is, his cruelty to the Mohammedan cap- tives, and the inhabitants in general : he made a desert that his own Goths might colonize it. In the eyes of his bishojis, however, this was scarceljr a fault ; and if it were, he redeemed it by the churches and monasteries which he founded ; and he built, as well as fortified, many towns. From this period, though the records are lost, must he dated many communities to which charters were given, — municipal corporations, which, during a great part of the middle ages, guaranteed the liber- ties of the people. The memory of this prince has been always reverenced in Spain. The epithet Cnii'ioUcvi'ns pi'obably preserved by his attachment to religion ; but he was near being worshipped as a saint. It is said by Sebastian of Sala- manca, that a choir of angels descended to conduct his sovd to heaven ; and the assertion is repeated by all the histo- rians of Spain, from that bishop to Mas- den, and even Ortiz ! (Dunham's His- tory of Spain, vols. i. and iv.) Alfonso II., siu-named the Chaste, the eighth sovereign of the Asturian and Leonnese dynasty, was the son. of Fruela I., whom the people had murdered. 307 Probably he was an infant when this deed was performed : we know that four princes ( Aurelio,Silo,Mauregato, and Bermudo I.) reigned between his father and himself. One reason for his exclusion was doubt- less the fear lest he should seek to revenge his father's death. From his accession, 791, to his decease in 842, he was fre- quently engaged in hostilities with the Arabs ; and \'ictory generally shone on his banners. Probably he had as much trouble from Ills own restless nobles, as from the enemy : once he was seized by a large body of rebels, and confined in a monas- tery ; but a faithfid band of vassals has- tened to release him, and bore him in triumph to Oviedo, where he established his seat of government. That city he both enlarged and embellished ; and where humble wooden houses had before stood, buildings of stone, at once exten- sive and massive, now arose. The church of San Salvador, which was thirty years in building, was magnificent as well as extensive. His surname of the Chaste arose from his continence towards his own wife, a French princess, if any faith is to be placed in Don Lucas, bishop of Tuy; but many writers contend that he never did marry. His sister, it is also asserted, fell in love with Sancho, count of Saldaiia, whom she privately married when Alfonso would not consent to the match : her preg- nancy betrayed her ; she was immured in a nunnery — the count in a prison ; and the issue was Bernardo del Carpio, so famous for his exploits against the Moors. All this is romance : Alfonso had no sister ; there was no Sancho count of Saldaiia, and, consequently, there was no Ber- nardo. (The same history, which is taken from contemporary authorities.) Alfonso lit. (reigned from 866—910), the eleventh king of Leon and the Astu- rias, was the son and successor of Or- doiio I. The very beginning of his reign was troubled. By a count of Gallicia his capital was taken, and he was compelled to flee into the mountain fastnesses of Alava; but by the senate of Oviedo the usurper was slain, and Alfonso was restored. A second rebellion by a covmt of Alava was more easily suppressed. In the pre- cincts of his palace he found the dag- ger ready to shed his blood ; the death of the conspirators struck a salutary fear into the rest. Over the Mohammedans he was victorious ; and he wrested from them the country as far as the Sierra de Cucnza, in the territory of Toledo ; as frr as the Duero in Estremadura and Por- tugal, and, in one instance, as far as tl:e X 2 A LF ALF Giiadiana. These regions, indeed, had been overrun by Alfonso I., but they had since been recovered by the Arabs ; and, in a century afterwards, they were again to be recovered by the great Ahnansor. His reign, too, was memorable for his conduct in regard to Navarre. The people of that province, or at least of Pamplona, its capital, had been always disposed to hostilities against the kings of the Asturias ; prob;.'bly the great vas- sals were dependant on the successors of Charlemagne, not on those of Pelayo ; and this dependence may account for the ill-will borne towards Navarre by the latter kings. We know at least that war was frequent, and that it was occasioned, in many instances, by the ambition of the French and Asturian kings. To have some hold on the allegiance of a portion at least of the country, Alfonso, in 873, bestowed on Sancho liiigo, count of Bigorre, a valiant Frank, the govern- ment of Navarre, which Sancho was to hold on the usual feudal terms. Sancho was thus the vassal of two crowns, — of the French, as far as his lordship of Bigorre, and perhaps a portion of Na- varre were concerned ; — of the Astui'ian, for the southern, western, and perhaps central portion of the province. This was not wise policy : the lords of Navarre were not likely to prove a bulwark against the Mohammedans on the one hand, or the Franks on the other ; they would naturally aim at their own independence of all three. The last years of the king's reign were troubled. His son Don Garcia rebelled against him ; the undutiful prince was unsuccessful, and consigned to a for- tress three years. Hearing that Garcia was treated with rigour, the nobles armed to release him ; and to avoid a civil war, Alfonso resigned the crown in his favour. He did not long survive his abdication. Having paid a visit to the shrine of San- tiago, in Gallicia, he obtained, on his return to Astorga, permission from his son to strike a parting blow at the Mo- hammedans ; and he made a destructive irruption into their tei'ritory. On his death, in 910, he left behind him the reputation of being one of the greatest princes Spain had ever produced. (Fer- rare's Hlstoria de Espaiia. Masdeu, His- toria Ci'itica de Espaiia. Dunham, History of Spain, vol. ii. and iii.) Alfonso IV. (reigned 925—930,) son of Ordoiio H., and grandson of Al- fonso HI., was the successor of his imcle, Frucla H. He was a feeble prince : thiough piety he resigned his crown, and retired to the monastery of Sahagun ; but he soon repented of the step, hastened to Leon, seized the dig- nity, was besieged, taken, blinded, and sent again to his monastery by his bro- ther, Ramiro H. Alfonso V. (reigned 999—1027,) son of Bermudo H., succeeded at a time when the victorious arms of Almansor (see the name) had subdued most of the kingdom of Leon. Though on his ac- cession he was only five years old, the affairs of the kingdom were ably admi- nistered by a regency, which, in 1001, triumphed over Almansor, who was left dead on the field. As Alfonso grew in years, he zealously repaired the disasters which the Moslem wars had uifiicted on his country. He rebuilt and repeopled Leon, which again became his capital ; he restored to the church and to indi- viduals the property of whicli both had been despoiled; he promulgated many salutary laws ; and controlled, as much as he could, the tyranny of his locfil counts. He was killed at the siege of Visen, in Portugal, by an arrow from the Mohammedan garrison.* Alfonso, in 1021, betrothed his son Bermudo to Ximena, the sister of Don Garcia, the infant count of Castile, and his daughter Sancha to Don Garcia him- self, who was to receive the title of king. This latter marriage Avas pi-evented by the assassination of Don Garcia in 102G. In Bermudo, the male line of the house of Leon was extinct. JIfonso T'l.f (reigned 10G5— 1109,) the second son of Fernando I. king of Leon an d Castile (see the last note) entered on tlie government of the former kingdom at tlie same time that his brother Sancho under- took that of Castile, and his brother Gar- cia that of Gallicia. For some time, the three brothers remained at peace ; hvA it was a peace that could not be lasting. • In order fully tn understand the Spanish bio- graphy of this period, the reader ought to be ac- quainted with the history of the counts of Castile. Dr. Dunham. (Hist, of Spain, ii. p. 144.) has >;iven an abridgement of it, which separates the historic:il from the fabulous, especially in the rase of Fernnn Gnnsalez, who lirst made the fief hereditary. It is onlv necessary for our present purpose, as an intro- duction to the life of Alfonso Vi., to state that Sancho el Ma\or, king nf Navarre, having claimed the sovereignty of Castile, in right of his queen, Maria Elvira, elder sister of the Ximenamentioned above, Sancho divided his possessions at his death among his children, giving the new kingdom of Castile to Fernando, who inherited Leon at the death of Bermudo. Sancho was thus the first, and Fernando the second /;^>ic/ of Castile. Fernando dyinj,' in 1065, divided his dominions also. t In the Biog. Univ. this article is half romance, and still more disgraceful for its omissions. AL F A L r la 1068, Alfonso was defeated by Sancho on tlie banks of the Pisuerga; in 1071, on those of the Carrion he was victor ; but he was surprised in liis camp, made prisoner, and consigned to the monastery of Saha^un, where it was mtended he should embrace the ecclesiastical state. Soon afterwards, however, we find him at the court of Aben Dylnun, king of Toledo ; whether he had been exiled, or had contrived to escape, we should vainly inquire. In 1072, Sancho being assassi- nated before the walls of Zamora, Al- fonso hastened to the city, and was acknowledged king of Leon and Castile. But even this success did not satisfy him ; and he dethroned his brother, Don Garcia, whom he consigned to the castle of Luna, and whom he treated wltli royal magnificence indeed, yet closely guarded. From this time he became a great conqueror over the Moors. He reduced Coi-ia, Toledo, Madind, Guada- lajara, &c., and rendered the kings of Saragossa and Badajos, &c. tributary. In short, he became so formidable, that the Moors called in the aid of Yussef Ben Taxfin, (see the name.) The conqueror was besieging Sara- gossa when he heard of Yussef 's dis- embarkation ; but he raised the siege, and met the African emperor on tlie plains of Zalaca. As the latter was zealous for the Koran, he summoned Alfonso to turn Mussulman, or to pay tribute, or to prepare for war. The in- dignant Christian, in presence of the Moorish ambassador, trampled the letter under his feet, saying, "Tell thy master what thou hast seen ! Tell him, above all, not to hide himself during the ap- proaching battle!" Never was a day more fiercely contested. The onset of Alfonso at the head of the christian cavalry, threw the Almoravides into confusion ; at the same moment, his imcle, the king of Navarre, forced back the Andalusians ; but Yussef, advancing with the rear, which consisted of the flower of his troops, the contest was maintained with great obstinacy, imtil nightfall, when Alfonso, who was severely wounded, retreated from the field. If his loss was great, that of the Almora- vides must also have been equally so, for he was not pursued. This great prince died in 1109. As his only son, Don Sancho, had fallen in battle with the Almoravides, he left to his eldest daughter, Urraca, (now widow of Raymund count of Burgvmd}', or very recently married to her second 309 luisband, Alfonso I., king of Aragon and N.ivarre,) the united crowns of Leon and Castile ; and to their son, Alfonso Raymund, the lordship of GaUicia, as an hereditary fief. Some years before, he had conferred on Henry count of Be- san9on, who had married his daughter, Theresa, all his Lusitanian conquests, from Oporto on the Duero to the con- fines of Badajoz. This was bad policy, but it vv'as the fault of the age. (Ferreras, Histoire Generale d'Espagne, by Her- milly, torn. iii. Dunham's Spain and Portugal, vols. ii. and iii.) Jjjonso VII. (reigned 1109—1114,) the husband of Urraca, who ruled con- jointly with her, was unable to bear her capricious, sometimes violent disposi- tion ; still less her infidelities to his bed. Being separated from him on the ground of affinity, a civil war fol- lowed, then a reconciliation ; but her conduct was so bad, that he re-entered tlie field. But the council of Palencia, (1112,) and subsequently the pope, de- clared the marriage null and void ; and Alfonso retired to his hereditary domi- nions of Ai-agon, (see Alfonso I.) where he ended his days in 1134, eight years after the death of Urraca. AIfoiis'> VIII. (reigned 1126—1157,) usually called tlie Einperor, son of Ur- raca and Alfonso VII., succeeded his mother in the kingdoms of Leon and Castile in 1126. For some years he was not on the best vmderstanding with his father, Alfonso, the seventh of Leon and the first of Aragon. And after the accession of Ramiro II. he invaded Aratjon : some fortresses of which he reduced, and refused to restore them except as fiefs. These and similar suc- cesses against Navarre and Barcelona elated him so much, that he assumed the empty title of emperor of all Spain, v.hile much was independent of him. The princes of Navarre and Portugal took up arms against him, and soon forced him to make peace. In his con- tests with the Mohammedans, he was more fortunate : assisted by his name- sake of Aragon, he removed the christian frontier from the Tagiis to the Sierra Morena, and made tributary the Moorish governors of some places in Andalusia itself, as Baeza and Andujar. His last great action against the Moors, — that of 1157, which he contested with the Cid Yussef, son of Abdelmmnen, was indecisive. — With all his vanity, Alfonso was no common monarch. In his crown of Leon, he was succeeded by his son, A LF ALF Fernando II. ; in that of Castile by his son, Sancho III. (Masdeu, Historia Critica. Dunham's Spain and Portugal, vol. ii.) Alfonso IX. (reigned 1188 — 1230), son of Fernando II., and therefore grandson of Alfonso VIII., _ was fre- quently at variance with his cousin, Alfonso III. of Castile. Feeling that he was not a fit match for the latter king, (Castile had recently much increased in power,) he entered into a close alliance with his uncle Sancho I. of Portugal, whose daughter he married. But in this marriage the church had not been con- sidted ; council and pope threatened ; and when the parties would not separate, an interdict was laid on the kingdom. This measure caused the superstitious multitude to complain; and in 1195, Alfonso and Theresa obeyed the haughty mandate of the pope. During the two following years, there v/as open war be- tween the kings of Leon and Castile. The latter, being defeated by the Mo- hammedans on the plains of Alarcos, used some insidting expressions to his cousin of Leon, who had ventured to upbraid him for his folly in withstanding alone the vast forces of the Almohades ; and Alfonso of Leon laid waste Castile in revenge. This was followed by re- prisals ; and in 1197, both kings met, each at the head of a formidable armj', to decide each other's fate. But the nobles and prelates of the two armies were averse from the shedding of chris- tian blood, at a time when the Almo- hades were on the watch to recover Spain ; and peace was effected on the condition that Alfonso of Leon should marry Berengaria, daughter of the Cas- tilian king, who by her mother, Eleanoi-, was nearly connected with the English Plantagenets. Yet the two parties were within the foi'biddcn degrees of consan- guinity ; and how they could expect the pope to be more tractable than before, is inconceivable. Innocent insisted on their separation, and ordered his legate to lay an interdict on both kingdoms in the event of a refusal. The legate, who had more sense and moderation than his master, hesitated to execute the atro- cious sentence, until he had tried what his own representations might effect with the pope. The latter, however, was obstinate ; the interdict was laid on Leon ; and the king and queen were excommunicated. For some years, their love made them disregard the menace ; but the complaints of the 310 people at length forced them to separate, on the condition that their children were declared legitimate by the pope, and ac- knowledged to be so by the states of Leon. "Tlie condition was granted, and Fernando, the eldest, received the ho- mage of the states as the successor of his father. In 1217, Fernando succeeded to the throne of Castile ; yet so hostile were the two kingdoms, that Alfonso laid waste the territories of his son : the truth is, he wished to i-eign in Castile as well as Leon, during the rest of his life, — well knowing that Fernando muse in- herit both. But he soon desisted from the enterprise, and joined his son in waiTinp- against the Mohammedans, From 1225 to 1230, the christian arms had considerable success ; Alfonso him- self reduced the important fortress of Badajoz, and extended his frontier in that direction. On his death in the lat- ter year, the states of Leon and Castile, which had been sepai-ated above two centuries, were for ever united. (The Archbishop Don Rodrigo, De Rebus His- panicis. Ferreras. And especially Dun- ham, History, vol. ii.) See St. Fernando, 2. Kings of Castile. Jlfonso I. (1072—1109,) of Castile, and the sixth king of Leon of that name, has already been treated of under Alfonso VI. of Leon. Aljon>o II. (the eighth of Leon, and surnamed the Emperor, 1126 — 1157.) See Alfonso VIII. of Leon. Alfonso III. (reigned 1158—1214,) the son of Sancho III. and grandson of Alfonso the Emperor, succeeded on the death of his father to the throne of Cas- tile, while his imcle Fernando II. held that of Leon, When that event took place, he was only three years old, and the reins of government were conse- quently entrusted to a regent. But the office was disputed between the rival families of the Castros and Laras, whose ambition was fatal to the prosperity of the kingdom. By the will of Sancho, indeed, "the trust had been confided to a noble of the former house ; but when a living sovereign was disobeyed, a dead one was not likely to be more potent. During twelve years there Avas little tranquillity ; but from the marriage o- Alfonso (1170) with Eleanor, daughter of our Henry II., we read no more of civil wars. Yet the reign of Alfonso was not without disasters. From 1170 to 1188 he was frequently at war with his uncle Fernando of Leon, and some- times with the Moors. After the death A LF A Li' of Fei'nanclo, he was equally at variance with his cousin Alfonso VIII. the son of that prince. First, the two sovereigns (juarrelled ahout some unimportant for- tresses in Estremadura, which their united arms had reverted from the common enemy. Alfonso of Leon claimed a share of them ; Alfonso of Castile would have the whole. Again, in 1195, Alfonso of Castile having the imprudence to engage a vast African force on the pla of Alarcos, without waiting for the junc- ture of his cousin's army, and being defeated with great loss, could not bear the reproaches of the latter monarch, and a new war ensued, which, as we have before observed, was ended by the marriage of Berengaria, daughter of Alfonso III. with Alfonso VIII. of Leon. We have related, too, the obsti- nacy with which the pope insisted on the dissolution of this marriage, but that the issue was declared legitimate. In virtue of this declaration, Fernando, the eldest son of Alfonso VIII. was declared heir of Leon. The nullity of this marriage, however, led to renewed hostilities be- tween the two Alfonsos ; and they would probably have ended disastrously for one of the parties, had not the Castilian king, alarmed at the progress of the Almohades, consented to an alliance against those formidable Africans. On the plains of Tolosa, in 1212, Alfonso nobly redeemed his defeat on those of Alarcos, in 1195. This great victory he survived only two yeai-s, leaving the kingdom of Castile to his son Enrique I. Enrique died while yet a child ; and the result, so import- ant for Spain, was the perpetual union of the two crowns in St. Fernando and his posterity. (Ferreras. Conde. Dun- ham.) 3. Kings of Leon and Castile. Alfonso X. (reigned from 1250 — 1284,) surnamed El Sabio, or the learned, was the son of St. Fernando, the first monarch of the incorporated states, and conse- quently the grandson of Alfonso IX. of Leon. His reign is in some respects re- markable ; and it is the first, after that of his father St. Fernando, that drew the attention of Europe towards Spain. This monarch has generally been called Alfonso the Wise : never was an epithet worse applied, — a truth sufficiently evi- dent, from his conduct both foreign and domestic. 1. In the former respect, his first act was to obtain possession of Gascony, which he claimed in right of his ancestor, Alfonso III. of Castile, who was to have received, but who never 311 had received it, as a marriage portion with a French princess. But possession was held by our Henry III., and feeble as Henry was, Alfonso was not powerful enough to subdue it. After much useless expenditure, peace was made by the marriage of Edward, the eldest son of Henry, with Eleanor, sister of Alfonso. Scarcely was the aft'air settled when a more serious one intervened. In right of his mother Beatrix, daughter of Philip, duke of Swabia and emperor of Germany, he laid claim to that duchy ; but by tlie states Conradin (see the name) was pre- ferred, and after the premature death of the last scion of the splendid house of Hohenstauffen, his claim was urged with equal inefficiency. He continued this expensive but unavailing contest against Richard, earl of Cornwall, for the impe- rial crown, and on his death, in 1271, he tried again, but Rodolf of Hapsburg was the successful candidate. 2. His inter- nal administi-ation added to the exasj^er- ation of his people. They murmured at his expensive folly in regard to Ger- luany : they denounced with rage his cession of the Algarves to the king of Portugal, as a marriage portion M'ith his illegitimate daughter Beatrix de Guz- man. To lead him to a better policy, some of his barons confederated, armed, and in alliance with Aben Alhamar, king of Grenada, broke out into open rebel- lion. Instead of meeting this boldly, he conceded, what was demanded — a course which naturally led to new de- mands and new concessions. On the death of his eldest son, Fernando de la Cerda, he caused his second son Don Sancho to be proclaimed, though Fernando had left sons. This act offijnded many of his nobles, and still more the French king, whose sister Fernando had married, and who con- sequently supported the rights of his nephews. His attempt to allay this quarrel by giving Murcia as an inde- pendent sovereignty to the sons of Fer- nando ; his debasement of the coin, while he ordered its value to remain the same ; and his petulant tempei", which broke out in acts of tyranny (such as the murder of his brother), dis- gusted all. His son Sancho made war upon him, and soon left him only Bada- joz and Seville. In 1283, he disinherited Don Sancho in favour of the sons of Fernando, and in their defaidt, the king of France was to inherit. The pope took his part, and Don Sancho, who was beghming to repent, fell sick. What- ALF ALF e-vev were the failings of Alfonso, he was not deficient in paternal affection ; and no sooner did he hear of his son's danger, than he too feU sick. The vigour of youth caused the son to re- cover, but Alfonso soon breathed his last. He did not, however, revoke his last will. This monarch is now to be considered as a legislator, a pliilosopher, a poet, an historian, and a man of letters. 1. As the compiler of the Siete Partidas, he is entitled to the reverence of pos- terity. This code was derived from the four preceding codes of Spain, viz. the Justinian, the Wisigotliic, the P'uero Juzgo, and the Fuero Real ; from tlie local fueros, or privileges, conceded to the municipal corporations by the pre- ceding kings of Leon and Castile ; from the canons of councils ; and from the maxims of philosophers. It is a com- plete digest of Roman, feudal, and canon law ; and is by far the most valuable monument of legislature, not merely Spanish, but European, since the publi- cation of the Roman code. It is still the basis of Spanish law ; for though more recent compilations exist, they are chiefly foimded on it. If all the written codes were banished, Spain would still have a respectable body of jurisprudence. An analysis of it may be found in Dun- ham's Spain, vol. iv. How much of it was the composition of Alfonso himself? This question can never be answered. Many were the jurisconsults whom he brought from Italy and Germany into Spain ; three at least he established in the new university of Salamanca ; and he had several about his person to assist him in the decision of cases which per- petually arose. Much of this compila- tion is doubtless attributable to them, but much also to himself. 2. The " Alfonsine Tables" evince the taste of this monarch for astronomy. That they were chiefly contributed by the scientific Moors whom he had drawn from Gre- nada to his own court, is certain ; but we have evidence enough of his skill in that branch of science. The blasphemous expression which he is said to have used,- — that if he had been present at the creation, he coidd have advised some things for the better, — it is to be hoped was never uttei'ed ; merely intended to ridicule the Ptolemaic sys- tem. Like all the astronomers of that period, he was a believer in judicial astro- logy, and in the possibility of finding tlie philosopher's stone : nay, he de- clares that he certamly knew it through 312 the help of an Egyptian, whom he had brought from Alexandria. 3. The verses of Alfonso are didactic, dry, unima- ginative ; but their style is pure. • Of these the Tesoro, which contains precepts for the transmutation of metals, is the most curious. Like many other men, Alfonso was enthusiastic, and easily de- ceived by some artful impostor, who pretended to the knowledge which had been sought for so many ages. The Cantigas, or poems in honour of Our Lady, are in the Gallician dialect, for which he seems to have had a taste. Of his Querelas, or Lamentations against his desertion by his courtiers, fragments only remain ; but they exhibit extraordi- nary elegance. 4. How much of the celebrated Cronica General de Espaiia should be attributed to this writer, must ever remain doubtful. One manuscript of the works distinctly affirms that it was composed (compuesto) by him ; but this is not of equal antiquity with the rest, which have, (jue mando fazer, " which he commanded to be made." From the use, however, of the first person plural in the prologue, and from several passages in the body of the history, it is plain that his own pen wrote some of the work. It is chiefly a compilation from preceding historians ; but the fourth part, which is mostly fabulous, is probably derived from the songs and ballads of the time. It is, beyond doubt, one of the most curious and interesting books in the Spanish lan- guage. 5. The Letters and the Miscel- laneous Works of Alfonso (of which most have perished) evinced his taste and his diligence. Indeed, if the number of writings generally ascribed to him were really composed by him, he must have passed many years of his life in his closet. By his liberality, no less than his ex- ample, he gave an impulse to literature which no other monarch of Spain ever did. On the whole, it may be said of him that if he was esteemed a prodigy in the thirteenth, he would be hailed as a man of learning in the nineteenth cen- tury. (Nicolas Antonio, BibliothecaVetus. Tlie Spanish Translators of Bouterwek, Historia de la Literatma Espaiiola. Sanchez, Proemio al Tomo I. in Colec- cion de Poesias Castellanas anteriores al Siglo XV. Dunham, History of Spain, vols. ii. and iv.) Alfonso XI. (1312—1350,) son of Fer- nando IV. and great grandson of Alfonso el Sabio, was an infant on his father's death. His minority, as was usually the rase, was one scries of troubles ; and A LF ALF even after his assumption of the govern- ment, he had many enemies in the princes of his family, and in the family of Lara. Some he removed hy violence ; some he gained by magnificent offers ; others, without breaking out into open rebellion, refused to obey him. For this reason he had little time to combat the enemies of his country and faith ; but when he did enter the field, he fought not unworthily of his great ancestors. The most famous of his exploits was the great victory of Tarifa (1340) over the allied Moors of Andalusia and Africa. It was, indeed, one of the greatest ever won lay chris- tian monarch. Though his own loss was not great, to the Mohammedans it was immense ; according to the historian Abu Abdalla, it was unequalled. He was certainly one of the greatest princes Spain ever produced. He had many noble qualities ; yet they were stained by his criminal connexion with Leonora de Guzman, whose tragical fate will be recorded in the reign of his son, Pedro the Cruel. Nor must we forget that Alfonso was a man of letters. At least he was a poet, though the Metrical Chro- nicle, ascribed to him by Nicolas Antonio and Bouterwek, is certainly not his. 4. Kings of Ar agon and Navarre. Alfonso I. was the fourth king of Ara- gon, and the nuilh of Navarre.* His genii;s was even more warlike than that of his predecessor, the best of all qualifi- cations at a period when so large a por- tion of Spain groaned under the yoke of the misbelievers. Unfortunately for his kingdom, his marriage with an un- principled woman, Urraca of Leon (see the name) long prevented him from pro- secuting the conquests which he had medi- tated ; but when his arms were at Uberty, he showed that he was one of the greatest heroes Spain had ever produced. For some years he was employed in the re- duction of the places north of the Ebro, conquests as useful as they were endm-ing. By degrees he obtained possession of all those sun-ounding Saragossa, and by thus isolating that important city, ren- dered its ultimate fall inevitable. In vain did the last Mohammedan king of that place implore the aid of his coun- trymen : Alfonso pressed the siege, and in 1118 had the glory to reduce it. Nor did these brilliant successes satisfy him. * For the grounds on which the kingdom of Navarre is made to be^in with Garcia I. in 88.5, 3Qd for the origin of that kingdom, and that of Aragon, the reader is referred to Dunham's Hibt. of Spain, vol. iii. pp. 1—7, and 78. 313 In 1120 he defeated, on the plains of Daroca, a vast force of the Almoravides, leaving 20,000 dead men on the field. Tu- dela, Tarragona, Calatayud, Daroca, Me- quinencia, and many other important fortresses, were successively reduced by him. Valencia he oveiTan, and Anda- lusia did not escape his ravages. He was the first christian prince that, since the fall of Rodrigo the Goth, had carried his arms into the latter country. Hence he was surnamed El Batallador, or the fighter. Eut his attempt before Fraga was fatal to his army. Whether he fell amidst thousands of Aragonese on that eventfid day, or whether he fled from the scene of battle to the monastery of St. Juan de la Peira, where grief in a few days brought him to his end, is imcer- tain. (Moret, Anales de Navarra, lib. XV. and xvii. Zurita, Anales de Aragon, lib. i. Dunham's Spain, vol. iii.) The remaining kings named Alfonso were kings of Aragon only. Alfo7iso II. (reigned 1163—1196,) the seventh king of Aragon, was the son of Petronilla (see the name), sovereign queen, and of Raymund, count of Barcelona. Hence he succeeded to both govern- ments ; which he amplified still more by the incorporation of Rousillon with Cata- lonia, and of Provence with both. He also took from the Moors several for- tresses, of which the most considerable was Teruel. Alfonso III. (reigned 1285—1291,) son of Pedro III. does not occupy a very shining post in history. He reduced, indeed, the Balearic Isles, of which his uncle, a vassal of Catalonia, was king, and he resisted France and the pope, who were in alliance against him ; but he made no conquests from the Moors ; and he was compelled to grant so many pri- vileges to his nobles, to part with so many of his royal prerogatives, that his government was rather an aristocracy than a monarchy. He was succeeded hy his brother, the king of Sicily, who reigned as Jayme II. Alfonso IV. (1327 — 1336,) son of Jayme II. had much annoyance from his new possession of Sardinia, which his father had obtained in consideration of abandoning the claims of the Aragonese crown, or that of Sicily. (See Jayme II.) The Genoese were his enemies, and they found him enough to do. He fomented the internal distiu'bances of Castile, wliich, diu-ing the reign of Alfonso XI. were, as we have before related, perpetual ; but the rebellion of his own son, Pedro, ALF A L F miglit have taught him how imprmlent it was to act thus. Pedro, however, had no wish to dethrone his father, whom a dropsy soon hrought to tlie grave. Alfonso V. (reigned 1415 — -1458,) son of Fernando I. was also king of Sicily, which dignity he inherited from his father, (see Fernando I.) and eventually of Naples. He has been called the Mag- nanimous ; and in one act, at least, he certainly deserved the epithet ; for hearing, soon after his accession to tlie tlirone of Aragon, that some of his subjects were consjiiring in favour of the Count de Urgel, who had claimed the ci'own in opposition to his father, he refused to read the list which con- tained their names, though he took effectual measures to crush the conspi- racy. Nor was he less firm in main- taining the rights of his crown against the democratic membei-s of his coi-tes, who insisted that he should be as much the slave of their will as some of his pre- decessors had been. The vigour of his character awed the demagogues, who were glad to escape from his presence. But this vigour was sometimes misap- plied : in one instance at least it rendered him criminal. The archbishop of Sara- gossa, who had offended him by espous- ing the democratic interests, and by a traitorous correspondence with the enemy of Aragon, disappeai'ed in 1429, and was no more heard of. That he was removed by the royal order, is certain ; and it is equally certain that no inquiry was made into the mysterious affair. The prelate nuist surely have committed some deed more heinous than even treason to be thus treated ; and it was probably the conviction of this fact that prevented the pope from interfering. The ti-ansactions of this king in Italy occupied the greater portion of his reign. His first object was to redeem the islands of Corsica and Sardinia, which had been conferred on one of his predecessors, but which had perpetually revolted, and cost immense waste of blood and treasure to the Aragonese. Some fortresses on the coasts were all that the superior lords could hold ; tlie war which followed — a war in which the islanders were aided by the Genoese — was generally successful to Alfonso; but in the midst of it he re- ceived a proposal so agreeable to his ambition, that he instantly suspended Iiis present operations, and eagerly accepted it. Joanna, queen of Naples, after dis- appointing many princes, had married the Count de la Marche, of the roj'al 314 house of France. From the fickleness of her character, she was soon disgusted with her husband ; she expelled both him and all of his nation ; and when she heard that the duke of Anjou was coming to protect the interests of France, she offered to adopt Alfonso as her heir, if he would assist her in repelling the menaced ag- gression. The hope of a crown which had so long glittered in the eyes of his pi'edecessors, made Alfonso eagerly ac- cept the condition. He hastened to Naples, raised the siege, was immediately acknowledged heir, and put in possession of Calabria. But his success filled the queen with jealousy ; she tried to remove him by violence ; and to effect the de- struction of his followers, she again courted the alliance of the French. The valour of the king befriended him, and he subdued most of the kingdom. Being summoned to Spain, however, his con- quests were lost, and the duke d'Anjou adopted as heir to the Neapolitan crown. Again had he to commence the work of conquest ; some of the barons were still friendly to him ; and with her usual fic- kleness, even the queen revoked her adoption of the duke, and confirmed his own. On her death, he claimed the king- dom ; but so also chd the pope ; and a war ensued, in which, though Alfonso was made prisoner by the pope's ally, the duke of Milan, he was soon released : victory so far shone on his banners, that Calabria and Apulia acknowledged him, and that both the reigning popes (it was the time of the schism) proposed to in- vest him with the Two Sicilies on the condition of his doing homage to each. He accepted the proposal of Eugenius IV. in preference to that of Felix V. ; he consented not only to reign as the vassal of the holy see, but to assist the former in the recovery of Ancona ; and in re- turn his bastard son, Fernando, whom he designed as his successor to the throne of the Two Sicilies, was declared legitimate. Henceforth he was the ally of the pope ; and he plunged into the interminable sea of Italian politics. His Spanish subjects had little reason to be satisfied with the brilliancy of his conquests, which, though purchased by their blood and their treasure, were of no value to tlieni ; and their dissatisfaction was still fai'ther aug- mented by his preference of Naples as a residence to Saragossa, or any other city of Aragon. His neglect too of a vir- tuous and dutiful wife for an Italian mistress, was offensive. In other respects he was an extraordinary man. He rciid A L F A LF as much as his dissipations, or his war- like deeds would allow him ; he was the patron of letters ; he was the correspon- dent of literaiy men, the most eminent of his time ; and the praises which tliey, liow- ever differing in politics, bestowed upon him, are some presumption of his merit. The fearlessness with which he dispensed with his retinue — asserting that the hearts of his people were his best guards ; his frequent attendance on public lectures ; the intrepidity with which, on more oc- casions than one, he risked his own life to save that of others (witness his ven- turing into the sea during a furious storm, to save the crew and passengers of a sloop which was about to sink, and his noble declaration that he would rather be the companion than the useless spectator of their death), prove that he had the ele- ments of greatness in his composition, and that he was not undeserving of the epithet witli which both his contempo- rai'ies and posterity have honoured him, Alfonso the Magnanimous. (Lucius Ma- rin^eus Siculus, De Rebus Hispanige, lib. xi. Zurita, Anales de Aragon, tom. ii.) 5. Khigs of Portugal. Alfonso T. son of Henry of Be- sanfon, by Tei"esa, daughter of Alfonso VI. of Leon, (see the name,) who gave the territories between the Minlio and Tagus to his son-in-law, as a fief. On his death, in 1112, Teresa had tlie power, Alfonso being an infant, and she would not resign it to him long afterwards, until compelled by an unsuccessful contest. Alfonso was, for many years, content with the title of count ; but by his re- sistance to the king of Leon he clearly aspired to an independent sovereignty. Peace being made with Leon, he turned his arms against the Mohammedans, to whom he became a more formidable enemy than his father had ever been. In 1139 he entered on the career of conquest which has immortalized his name. His splendid victory over the Moors on the plains of Curique em- boldened him to assume the regal title, and to declare his independence of Leon. In 1146, he reduced Santarem, whicli had again fallen into the power of the Almoravides ; the following year lie re- covered Lisbon ; and in the interval between 1147 and 1165 he won Cintra, Alcazar do Sal, Coimbra, Palmela, Evora, Beja, and a multitude of other fortresses. His career was once interrupted by a serious war with Leon, and in an ag- gression on that power, he was made prisoner ; but he was courteously enter- 315 tained, and speedily released. One of his last triumphs was over the fonnidable Yussef, emperor of the Almoravides, who died before Santarem, a few months only prior to Alfonso's own death, in 1185. That this founder of the Portuguese mo- narchy was a great prince, cannot be disputed. He was a hero, a legislator, a patriot ; and making all due allowance for the supernatural circumstances which the Portuguese have invented respecting him, he was well deserving of the almost unrivalled reputation which he enjoys. With his great public virtues, indeed, he combined some private vices ; but these were inseparable from the period. He was succeeded by his son, Sancho I. (Lemos, Historia Geral de Portugal, tom. iii. La Clede, Histoire Generale, tom. ii.) Alfonso IT. (reigned 1211 — 1223), son of Sancho I. and consequently grandson of the founder of the Portu- guese monarchy, was the third king of that country. His reign was less glo- rious than that of his predecessors. One of his first acts was to evade the exe- cution of his father's will, and thereby to deprive his brothers and sisters of the dowry which had been left them. A war with Leon, which was little to his advantage, and the interference of the pope, compelled him to be just. In his wars with the Mohammedans, he was slow and feeble ; l)ut he recovered some fortresses. His disputes with the church were frequent. He was naturally averse to the clerical immunities ; and he sub- jected churchmen to the ordinary tri- bunals, and rendered their substance available to the necessities of the state. The reforms which lie introduced into the secidar courts of justice, do honour to his memory. He was the friend of the poor; to the accused, he afforded ample means of defence ; and when the sentence was pronounced, he insisted tliat between it and the execution twenty days should elapse. His ecclesiastical reforms were disagreeable to the pro- fession. The archbishop of Braga ven- tured loudly to condemn them, but he could not withstand the monarch; he was deprived of his revenues, and forced to consult his safety by flight. He com- plained to the pope ; the pope threaten- ened, excommunicated, and laid an intercUct on tlie kingdom. The im- pression made by these measures on his people, compelled Alfonso to make peace with the pope and the archbishop ; but he did not live to enjoy the good fruits A L F A LF of the reconciliation. (Lemos, Historia Geral, liv. xii. La Clede, Histoire, liv. vi.) Jffonso in. (reigned 1248 — 1279), second son of Alfonso II. succeeded his brother, Sancho II. not in the course of nature, but by a decree of the council of Lyons. The truth is, Dom Sancho (see the name) abused his power to such a degree that prelates and barons appealed for redress to the council, and by that assemblv,which considered Portugal a fief of the church, the royal title indeed was left to Sancho, but the administration was entrusted to Alfonso. At this moment the infante was at Boulogne-sur-Mer, the fief of wliich he had received with his wife, the countess Matilda. Leaving her and the lordship, he hastened to Portugal, and after some difficulties, he became, on the death of Sancho in 1248, the real kinof of Portii^al. Alfonso was an active monarch ; he expelled the Moors from the fortresses which they still held in the Algarves. A few years after his acces- sion, he quarrelled with his namesake of Castile respecting that southern province. To avert a war, it was agreed that the Portuguese should marry the daughter of the Castilian, Doiia Beatrix de Guzman. Yet Matilda was still alive, and he had the baseness to pretend that their marriage was invalid, ab initio, in order to marry Beatrix. Matilda had married him when lie was poor and without hopes ; this was the reward she reaped. On her coming to Portugal, she was sent back to Bou- logne ; but the pope, to his honour, de- clared her his lawful wife, and excom- municated Alfonso. In 1262, on the death of Matilda, Alfonso was remarried, and his children declared legitimate by the pope. In other points of his charac- ter Alfonso has just as little claim to cur respect. He broke the promises by which he first gained popularity, and when secure on his throne was tyrannical. He opposed the immunities of the chui'ch, but net with the purest motives, and he exacted from his son and successor, Dinis, a promise to respect them. (Lemos. La Clede.) Jlfonso IV. (reigned 1325 — 1357), surnamed the Brave, was the son of Dinis, the grandson of Alfonso III. and the seventh king of Portugal. Before his accession he was often in arms against his father, on account of the preference shown by Dinis to an Olegitimate son, Alfonso Henriques, who gave him also much trouble when he began to reign. His neglect of serious affairs, and his love of hunting, gave much disgust to 316 his nobles. The early years of his reign were occupied in disputes with Castile, though his daughter was the wife of Alfonso XI. king of that country. The discontented nobles of both kingdoms, especially the royal princes, were eager enough to widen the breach. When Al- fonso of Castile dismissed his queen, and took a mistress, the notorious Leonora de Guzman (for whose tragical fate see the life of Pedro the Cruel), a harassing but indecisive war followed, to which the intervention of the pope put an end. He forced the Castilian to take back his queen, but he still retained his mistress also. If Alfonso of Portugal was an un- dutiful son and a stern father, no doubt can be entertained that he possessed some noble qualities. Whatever his causes of complaint with his son-in-law, he did not fail to assist him in the wars against the Mohammedans. He was present at the celebrated battle on the banks of the Salado, but would have no share in the innnense plunder, which he left to his son-in-law. To the close of the Castilian's life, he continued to aid the christian cause in Andalusia. The last troubles of Alfonso arose from his son Pedro (see the name), whose connexion with the guilty and far-famed liies de Castro (see the name) he termi- nated by the tragical death of that lady, Pedro, in revenge, laid waste Tras os Montes and Entre Douro e Minho, but the interference of the queen and of some prelates effected a reconciliation. (La Clede. Lemos. Ferreras.) Alfonso V. (reigned 1438 — 1481), was only six years of age when he suc- ceeded to his father, Duarte. The re- gency was at first exei'cised by Leonora, the queen-mother, but she was obliged to resign it to Pedro, duke of Coimbra, one of the uncles of the king. She was assisted in her attempts to regain it by the conde de Barcelos, a natural brother of Pedro, but she was unsuccessful. She died 1445. When Alfonso reached his majority, the age of fourteen (a. d. 1446), it was hoped these troubles would cease. He married Isabel, the daughter of Pedro, to whom he had been affianced at the age of ten years, but the enemies of Pedro contrived to poison the royal mind, and he retired to his estates. This re- treat only added to his misfortune ; so busy was calumny that by public edict Alfonso prohibited all Portuguese from holding any intercourse with the duke of Coimbra. At the instance of the duke of Braganza, he was next declared a A L F A LF traitor, and was besieged in Coimbra. Alfonso, who loved his wife, would par- don her fatlicr if he would acknowledge his crime. The high-soided prince re- fused, simply because he had no crime to acknowledge. He continued to resist ; he was assailed by troops ; he defended himself and fell ; and his corpse was dis- honoured by order of the wrathful king. But Alfonso soon repented of his conduct : all Europe cried for vengeance on the murderers of a great prince, and they would have been punished had the queen lived ; but fearing her influence, the vile house of Braganza removed her by poison. Alfonso was a warlike sovereign. He had prepared, like many other christian princes, a powerful armament against the Tm-ks, when the fall of Constantinople, and the death of the pope, dissolved the confederacy, and he turned his arms against Africa. In 1457 he reduced Alcazar Seguer ; in vain did the king of Fez try to recover it ; it manfully resisted, and occasioned the Moorish king the loss of two firniies. On Tangier he failed, and the flower of the Portuguese chivalry fell at tlie siege. In 1471, however, he reduced Arcilla, and the inhabitants of Tangier were so terrified by the fate of tlie gr.rrison, which was mercilessly put to the sword, that they abandoned the city, and the Portuguese converted it into a bishop's see. Hence Alfonso was honoured with the surname of Africanns ; but he little deserved it, for in these wars he exhibited no ability, and the successes which were gained were owing to his generals. In his transactions with Cas- tile, he added no lustre to his name. Enrique IV. having proclaimed Juana, (who was reputed his daughter, but known to be that of Beltran de la Cueva, and hence called the Beltraneja,) his successor, in opposition to Ferdinand and Isabel, the hand of Juana was offered to Alfonso by her party, on condition tliat he would vindicate her claims. He ac- cepted the condition, invaded Castile, and applied to the pope for a dispensa- tion to marry her, which was refused. Louis XI. indeed, for his own purposes, promised him aid ; and he went to Pai'is, where the crafty king amused him for some time. At length the veil dropped from his eyes, and he saw that he might probably be delivered into the hands of Fernando. In the first burst of his dis- appointment, he resolved to visit Pales- tine, and authorized his son Joam to assume the government. Joam was ac- Qordinglv proclaimed ; but Alfonso aban- 317 doned his purpose, arrived in Portugal, and found his son exceedingly averse to resign the crown. In the end, however, through the advice of the duke of Bra- ganza (see Braganza), the latter con- sented to live as a subject. Peace was now made with Castile, and Juana, aban- doned by all, was glad to take the veil in the convent of St. Clair. Two years after- wards, Alfonso died of the plague. The reign of this monarch, feeble as he was, is remarkable for the spirit of discovery which animated the Portu- guese. The Madeiras, the Canaries, the Cape de Verds, and other islands west of the African continent, were for the first time known to Europeans. No merit, however, is due to the king ; it must be awarded solely to the infant Henrique, (see the name), who dedicated his whole life to maritime discoveries. In some other respects Alfonso deserves praise. He was a patron of learning ; he col- lected libraries ; and appointed historio- graphers to write the national history. He was also the founder of a new order, that of the Tower and Sword, which requires some explanation. According to tradition, a mysterious sword was care- fully kept in a tower in the city of Fez. Respecting it, there was a prophecy that it, and the city which contained it, must one day be possessed by a christian king. Alfonso would fain believe, that the ac- complishment of this prediction was re- served for him ; and this was one of the motives which led him to the African war ! Some of his predecessors were equally credulous, or rather equally su- perstitious. (La Clede. Lemos. Fei'- rei-as. Dunham.) Alfonso VI. (reigned 1656 — 1685), the second prince of the house of Bra- ganza, succeeded his father Joam IV. in his thirteenth year. There was conse- quently a regency, and in his case it was prolonged by the will of Joam luitil he sliould attain his majority, and if neces- sary still farther. The weakness of his intellect and the capriciousness of his disposition, were the causes of a provision so unusual. His mother, a Spanish prin- cess, was the regent, and she continued the war between Spain and Portugal, which was of slight moment, till other nations engaged in it — the Portuguese appearing with foreign auxiliaries under Schomberg, and the Spaniards under Don Juan of Austria. We shall not enter into details, but observe that no permanent advantage rested with either party ; that if the Spaniards reduced a A LF A L F fortress one day, it was recovered tlie next ; mitil Don Juan, disgusted with liis post, complained, and was superseded by an ignorant grandee. Tlien followed the victory of Villaviciosa, which may be said to have secured the independence of Portugal. Some of the auxiliaries were English, which our Charles II. in virtue of his alliance with Portugal, and of his man-iage with the infanta, Catherina, sent to the peninsula. What share had Alfonso in these trans- actions ? None whatever : long before the victory of Villaviciosa, he had been lunited from the throne. His life had been one of shameless debauch and open profligacy ; and though he drove his mother from the regency, he paid no attention to his duties as a king. His wife, a daughter of the due de Nemours, with Don Pedro his brother, plotted his removal from tlie throne, and she aftei-- wards married Pedro, by a dispensation from Rome, obtained on a very ground- less pretence. Whatever their conduct, the fate of Alfonso was deservedly scaled. He was removed for a time to the Azores, but brought back to Cintra, where in 1683 he died. Before tiiis event, the regent Pedro- had the satisfaction to make peace v/ith Spain, under the mediation of her son Charles. All conquests were restored by both parties ; and Sjiain recognised the independence of her neighbour. (La Clede. Lemos. Ortiz, Compendio Crono- logio. Silva. Ferreras. Dunham.) A LFONSO, bishop of Avila in the reign of Juan II. king of Castile. He owed his elevation to his own merits ; he was much addicted to literature and science ; and his reputation vras as high at Rome as in Spain. ALFONSO, (Peter,) a learned Jew of Huesca, in Aragon, born in the year 1062. His original name was Rabbi Moses Scphardi ;* but in the year 1106, he embraced the christian faith, and was baptized in his native town on St. Peter's day, by Stephen, bishop of Huesca. Alfonso, king of Aragon and Navan-e, happened to be at Huesca at the time, and he was so much pleased by the con- version of Rabbi Moses, that he insisted upon acting as godfather at the cere- mony. In honour of the saint on whose day it took place, and of the monarch who took so much interest in it, the new convert received the name of Peter Al- phonso. The Jews, who were liighly * Sephardi, in Rabbinical Hebrew, means "of Spain." .318 scandalized by the secession of a man so profoundly erudite in their own writings as Rabbi Moses, spread abroad every kind of calumny against him, and ascribed to him the most dishonourable motives. To defend himself, and to show the real motives of the step which he had taken, Peter Alfonso published a book, in which he introduced a Jew, under his former name of Moses, and a Chi-istian, under his new name of Peter Alfonso, arguing the merits of their different creeds, and in which the latter succeeds in convincing his antagonist. Tliis book, WTitten in Latin, mider the title of Dialogues, was printed sepai-ately at Cologne, 8vo, 1.536, and was after- wards inserted in the Bibliotheca Magna Patnnn. It has frequently been the subject of the eulogies of learned men. But the most celebrated production of this writer is a Latin book, entitled, Disciplina Clericalis, wherein a philoso- 2:)hcr is made to instruct a youth by a series of entertaining tales, and which is not only interesting in itself, but which is extremely valuable on account of the light it throws upon the history of fable and romance. This book was very po- pular in the middle ages, and is con- tinually found in ancient manuscripts. It was translated into several languages, both m prose and verse. The Latin text, v/ith earl}'^ versions in French prose and French verse, was published by the Societe des Bibliophiles Francais, 2 vols. 12mo; Paris, 1824. A better edition of the Latin text has since that time been published at Leipzig. We may refer to the Introductions to these two editions for further information relating to its au- thor, as also for an account of other books which have been attributed to him, mostly, as it appears, without any good reason. The date of his death is not known. ALFONSO. For other personages of this name, see ALBuauERQUE, Ahner, Castro, Cordova, Este, Mela, Payva, Pedro, Quintanilla, Tostado, Vivera, &c. ALPORT, (Niccolo Guglielmi,) an engraver, a native of Lorraine, but who resided at Rome. At what exact period he flourished is not known. There are a set of twelve small upright plates of flowers, executed by him in a mastei'ly manner, though not very delicately en- graved. They are subscribed, Nicolaus GmlielmusAlj'orcELotharingusfecitRomee. — (Strutt, Diet, of Eng. Bryan's Diet.) ALFORD, (Michael,) an English Je- suit, whose real name was Griffith, was ALF A L F bovn at London in 1587. In 1G07 he entered the society at Louvain ; and after having studied philosophy at Seville, and theology at Louvain, he visited Italy, and during the period from 1615 to 1G20, filled the office of poenitentiarius ponti- ficius at the Vatican. Having been despatched by his order to England, lie was arrested as he landed at Dover, was taken to London, but released by the interference of queen Henrietta Maria. Taking up liis residence at Holt, he de- voted himself to study, chiefly to eccle- siastical history; and the first-fniits of liis researches was ' A Life of St. Wine- fride;' 8vo, 1635. In 1611 he published his ' Britannia illustrata ; cum Appendice de tribus liodie controversis ; de paschate Britannorum ; de clericormn nuptiis, et nunc olim Britannia coluerit Romanain Ecclesiam;' Antwerp. To complete his laborious researches into the ecclesias- tical annals of Britain, he passed over to St. Omer, where he was attacked by a fever, which terminated his life, Aug. 1 1 , 1652. His work upon the ecclesiastical annals of his country, extending to the year 1189, was published in four volumes folio after his death, under this title : ' Annales Ecclesiastici et Civiles Britan- norum, Saxonum et Angloiiun;' 1663. This work is very useful to the student of early English history. ALFORD, (Robert,) alias Griffith, a native of Surrey, born in 1582, studied at the English college at Rome : liaving joined the society of the Jesuits, he was sent to make proselytes in England, and died in the college of the Holy Apostles, July 8, 1610. Another of the same order, named William, died Jan. 8, 1675. ALFORD, (John, 1686—1761,) was the founder of a professorship of natural religion, moral philosophy, and civil po- lity, in Harvard college, which was first held by Levi Frisbie. (Allen's Diet.) ALFRAGANUS, see Alfergan. ALFRED, (the Great.) The brightest name that iUumines Anglo-Saxon his- tory, and perhaps the most illustrious monarch who ever filled the English throne. In writing the history of this remarkable man, we have the advantage of a biography of him, written by an ac- complished cotemporary, a bishop of the church, and a confidential friend of the suliject of his memoir, Asser Menevensis, and it is his authority wliich will be chiefly* followed in the following me- * Not. however, to the exclusion of other autho- rities, where their acount appears more probable, or where Asser is defective. 319 moir. Alfred was born at Wanading (Wantage), in Berkshire, in the year 849. He was the youngest son of king jEthelwulf, the reigning monarch ; and his mother, Osburgh, was a woman of real piety and excellence, but dying soon after the birth of lier son, she had not the satisfaction of developing his early talents. In the fifth year of his age, Alfred was sent by liis fatlier to Rome, wliere he received the apostolic benedic- tion from Pope Leo IV. who adopted him as his son, and conferred on him the title of king of Deraetia, or South Wales. Two years after this, in 855, iEthelwulf having arranged the tythings of his kingdom, himself visited Rome, taking Alfred with him ; and having been there honourably entertained for above a year, returned to his country, bringing with him Juditli, daughter of the Prankish monarch, as his wife. Doubtless the varied scenes which in his two visits to the apostolic see, and in his residence at the court of France, he had witnessed, inspired in the mind of young Alfred a desire of improvement ; still he was a favourite child, and indulgence and ig- norance seem as j'et to have been his lot. In Alfred's tenth year, 858, his father jEthelwulf died, and his two eldest sons, ^thelbald and iEthelbert, who had already for some time enjoyed a subordi- nate share of the government, divided the kingdom, and with the former of them, Judith disgraced herself by an incestuous marriage. None of the princes had been taught to read, and it is to Judith that we owe the first impulse that stimulated the genius of Alfred. He had for some time taken pleasure in listening to the poetry of his native language ; and when he was about twelve years old, Judith on one occasion was sitting sur- rounded by her family, and holding in her hand a manuscript of Anglo-Saxon poetry, and with a happy judgment pro- posed it as a gift to him who should first learn to read it. The elder princes de- clined the task, but the beauty of the illuminated capital had captivated the fancy of Alfred ; he took the book, and before long was master of its contents ; after which his piety led him to the study of the Psalms, and horary prayers, which, says Asser, he always carried about with him. I5ut here a bar pre- sented itself to his fartlier improvement. The literature of the Anglo-Saxons was in the Latin language ; to obtain a teacher of which, during that unhappy period of Northmen's depredations, was by no ALF A L F noatis an easy matter even for a prince. His principal instructors in Latin were (as he tells lis in his preface to his Gregory's Pastoral, printed at the end of Wise's Asser) Plegmund, his archbishop, Asser, his bishop, and Grimbold and Joannes (Erigena), his mass-priests ; but this was after his accession to the throne. But while Alfred diligently cultivated his mind, he did not neglect those bodily attainments, which were so necessary in those dangerous times ; and we find him accordingly strengthening his constitu- tion by the pleasures of the chase, for his skill in which he was very remark- able. The peaccfid studies of Alfred's appi'oaching manhood were, however, soon cut short by a tremendous event, ^thelbert, the last of Alfred's two eldest brothers, died, and the third brother, /Ethered or jEthelred, * acceded to the crown in 866, when the sudden descent of the sons of Ragnar Lodbrog, with a vast army of Northmen, covered the whole country with desolation and slaughter. Northumberland rapidly fell before the invaders, and they were preparing to enter Mercia, when jEthelred joined the king of Mercia, to oppose their progress. During this time (868), Alfred, who had been raised by his brother to a share in the sovereignty, married Ealswitha, daughter of jEthelred Mucil (the Large), a Mercian nobleman. Alfred then joined his brother in his expedition. They found the Northmen in possession of Notting- ham, where, unable to meet the Anglo- Saxon ann anient in the field, they re- mained within the fortifications of the town ; and the allied sovereigns, not perceiving the danger of suffering them to remain within the island at all, con- tented themselves with binding them by a treaty to retire to York. This mad policy brought the result that might have been expected. The next year the invaders ravaged all Lincolnshire and East Anglia, and in 871 occupied Read- ing. Defeated in a great battle at iEsces- dim by the kings of Wessex, they took refuge within the fortifications of Read- ing ; but the Anglo-Saxons suffered so severely in the contest, that the Danes, reinforced by new accessions of allies from the north, routed them fourteen days after at Basing; and again, two months after this, at Merton. In this last battle, jEthelred was mortally womided, • Malmesbury, and in modern times, Mr. Sharon Turner, write it jEthelred ; but Asser, Alfred's Will, and the Chronicle, have .lEthered. The former orthography is evidently right, but