PAM. SEW*. lOrtJjoticijq) anli tfyt i|eatf)m, bg the iUti. %. 11). glance, D.B. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/orthodoxyheathenOOryla I0rtbot>o)ri> anli tbc i^catben A SERMON PREACHED BY THE REV. J. H. RYLANCE, D.D., IN ST. MARK’S CHURCH, NEW YORK, December 12th, 1886. PUBLISHED BY REQUEST. $cur -$torfc: JAMES POTT & CO., PUBLISHERS. 1887. (Drtl)obojq) anb tl)c ijcatljcn. A SERMON. “ The desire of all nations shall come.” — H aggai ii., 7. Or — tlie things desired by all nations shall come ; which is a truer rendering of the original, probably. Pagan poets and philosophers were ever looking back, it has been said, on a golden age past. The golden age of Hebrew prophets was ever before them. Throughout the Jewish Scriptures we find promises of a better day for the world ; of the coming of a Teacher of truth, of a Deliverer from sin, of a King who should rule in righteousness. Hope of this better day was kept alive among the Jews by a succession of inspired teachers, and by symbolic rites ; expectation growing stronger, and the prospect brighter, as the time for their realization drew near. In these thino-s the descendants of Abraham were O favored above all other peoples. We commonly limit our thoughts of God’s moral dealings with mankind therefore to them, to the Jews; deeming all heathen nations outcasts from the circle of His sympathy. Yet were heathen men the children of the Father in heaven also, though on a lower level of status and privilege than “ the chosen race.” Blind, and debased, and desper- 2 ORTHODOXY AND TnE HEATHEN. ately wicked often, were the peoples that knew not God ; but in all nations above the imbruted condition, the workings of a moral reason and conscience were visible ; traditions of a lost heritage survived ; yearn- ings after deliverance from the disorder and misery of their condition were felt by multitudes of men, who nevertheless knew no sure way of escape ; while ex- amples of a noble, positive virtue were frequent in the Pagan world ; and that spite of terrible disadvantages in moral condition. Having no “ direct ” revelation of the mind and will of the divine Father, heathen men deciphered as best they could the intimations of Na- ture, and the intuitions of the soul ; the wisest among them attaining, however, to faith in God, and to a “ natural piety.” That is a more favorable estimate of the heathen, I know, than has been held and taught by a rigid “ or- thodoxy.” Evangelical systems of theology, notably that of John Calvin, have consigned all heathen peo- ples to eternal perdition, without discrimination as to their moral deservings. But some of Calvin’s theolog- ical children have been timidly hinting of late, that this wholesale condemnation of myriads of men, simply because they were born beyond certain geographical lines, is unreasonable and incredible. Hence consider- able stir just now in the ecclesiastical air; a so-called “ New Theology ” holding, that, if not by the “way of salvation” as we know it, then by some other way, will all good men out of the Pagan world, be gathered into the family of God in the life to come. But the doctrine is vehemently condemned by our evangelical Scribes and Pharisees as treasonable to the truth of ORTHODOXY AND THE HEA THEN. 3 Christ’s Gospel. Let us hope that the Scribes are wrong, as they so often have been ; believing that there is more mercy in God than there is in them. For the thought were intolerable, that the moral nobility and beauty of character which were once vis- ible in the lives of Pagan saints and sages, are fit only for burning. Among them were men whose tem- perance, and purity, and magnanimity, and charity, would put to shame a good deal of our Christian vir- tue. And surely the Spirit of God was at work in the minds and hearts of such men, though they knew not whence the inspiration came. Heathen peoples were intensely religious ; but in a blindly blundering way often. And what surprises us not a little, on becoming acquainted with their sacred books and customs, is the discovery of how much there is in common in them with what we find in our Bible. In all forms of religious worship worthy of regard, among Gentiles as among Jews, we find four great institutions in honor: — sacri- fices; a 'priesthood ; holy places ; and sacred seasons. Glance at the first for a moment. How wonderful that we come upon sacrifices everywhere ; and in all ages : not only among savages, but among peoples highly refined. One would be inclined to say, there- fore, that the custom of offering sacrifices was not the creature of any sort of imposture ; but that it sprang from some universally-felt want in men. Wherever we meet with it, it is the expression of the most sol- emn fears and hopes of human hearts ; bearing every- where the same general features, and having before it the same great aims. To win favor with the Di- vinity, as men thought, the sacrifice had to be a 4 ORTHODOXY AND THE HEATHEN. thing of value’, in desperate emergencies, something of the highest value, even life for life. Seeking relief from their terrors, men and women have given to death “ the fruit of their bodies for the sin of their souls,” as in Moloch worship ; the religious instinct here, as so often, suffering terrible perversion. Or the offering had to be rich and abundant. Hence the prodigality displayed in the “ rivers of oil ” of which we read, and “ cattle from a thousand hills.” But more siamifi- O cant than these was the requirement that the sacrifice should be pure. The victim must be without blemish, and undefiled by common uses : — “ the bullock that had never worn a yoke, the horse that had never known a rider,”* or the lamb, type of gentleness and innocence. The priesthood too, is everywhere in history ; in all climes, and under all civilizations. Worshippers the world round, have felt their own unworthiness so keenly that they have chosen mediators to represent them with the Deity, or with the deities, they have adored. The wise, the good, men highest in social rank, or those revered for their sanctity, have been called in to act as intercessors through prayers and offerings, in behalf of all the people. Heathenism had its holy places also. The common earth has seemed profaned by the wickedness done on it : piety has therefore sought exceptional places for worship. Deep in the obscurity of woods; or on the topmost heights of hills that reach to heaven ; — in such places devout instinct has built its temples, or its altars, to the Divinity it has acknowledged. Or certain times have been set * See “ Hulsean Lecture" for 1845 and De Pressenso’s “ Histoire des Trois Premiers Slides." ORTHODOXY AND 1'llE HEA THEN. ,) apart, and consecrated to religious uses. Men have felt that they must separate themselves from the asso- ciations of their daily common life to hold intercourse with the gods : and so they have instituted holy-days, sacred seasons, that their invocations and offerings might find better acceptance ; or that the help they sought might more surely come to them. Among all peoples who have left their names in history, these four institutions — sacrifice, a priesthood, sanctuaries, and sacred seasons, have had place. At first, or among the less enlightened tribes of mankind, the forms and forces of nature were deified and adored. In their blindness and confusion, men attributed to base matter the powers of divinity. They could not conceive of an absent, invisible God : they must have images before them which they could see and touch. But up from fetich worship, through higher forms of idolatry, we can trace a law of progress in the religious ideas and customs of mankind ; till at length, the gods are glorified patterns of men. This deification of humanity was an immense advance upon the coarser forms of idolatry which had generally pre- vailed in heathendom ; for thus a moral element began to assert itself in Pagan worship. But this soon proved fatal to the integrity and power of the old superstitions. Contempt for the gods once adored rapidly increased, among men of discernment. Reason and conscience had very generally got beyond the fables and impostures which had once satisfied them. Philosophers scoffed at them ; while even the common people became indifferent to the shrines at which they had long rendered an unreasoning homage. That 6 ORTHODOXY AND THE HEATHEN. was the condition of things which prevailed through- out the Roman empire, at least, at the ej)och of Christ’s birth. With its great hungry heart emptied of the hopes and fears that had once possessed it, the world was waiting for a purer faith and a nobler truth. And then it was, “ the f ulness of time having come” that “ God sent forth His Son; ” “ a light to lighten the Gentiles; ” “ the desired of all nations.” Yes ; vaguely, inarticulately, Christ was the desired of all nations. Not that they had any clear anticipa- tions of the personal Christ whom we know so well, from the fourfold account we have of Him in the Evangelists. But throughout the Pagan world there was a longing felt for the character which was after- wards embodied in Jesus of Nazareth ; or for the re- demption He came to accomplish for men ; for some Teacher of infallible truth ; for a Deliverer from the confusion and misery, of the times ; for a Lawgiver who should bring in the reign of peace and righteous- ness. In the mythologies and sacred mysteries of Paganism, in its systems of philosophy and in its codes of morality, we see the struggles of the human mind after light upon the mysteries that oppressed men, for help in the warfare with evil they endured ; and hear the yearnings of human hearts for a rest which mythol- ogies and philosophies could never give. Through these things men were groping after God, “ if haply they might find Him.” Bathed and disappointed often, aspiration, spite of all, was irrepressible. Till at length, in enlightened nations, a confident hope dawned upon here and there a devout thinker, that some prophet from the great God would soon appear, ORTHODOXY AND THE HEA THEN. 7 bringing light and salvation for the human race. How pathetically that feeling speaks out in words which Plato puts into the mouth of Socrates ! *• It is neces- sary to wait,” says the great sage, “ till some one shall teach us how it behoves us to conduct ourselves, both towards the gods, and towards men.” To which Alci- biades replies: — ‘‘When shall that time arrive, O Socrates ? and who shall that teacher be ? for most eagerly do I wish to see such a man.” Yes; “ most eagerly ” did men in all nations above the savage state, long for the appearance of some Di- vine messenger, to make known the mind and will of God more perfectly than the oracles of heathenism had done ; with which feeling Christian men may surely sympathize ; believing that the inspiration was from heaven, and that its aim was heavenward. From the beginning, the Creator has included the whole race of men in His purposes of mercy. Never in His moral dealings with any people, has there been any arbitrary “ respect of persons ” ; but “ in every nation , he that has feared God , and worked righteousness , has been ac- cepted!' ' Where the light of His fuller truth had never come, there “ rain and fruitful seasons ” were a Divine revelation ; as Paul taught the degraded people of Lycaonia. No cry from any truly penitent heart was ever unheard in heaven, at what altar soever tlie dev- otee bowed. One of the most comforting assurances in Holy Scripture to me, is the declaration of a Chris- tian apostle, as he looked round on a city full of idols : “The times of this ignorance God winked at ’ ” even as the Lord Jesus Christ said in behalf of His murderers: “ Father , forgive them : they know not what they doT 8 ORTHODOXY AND THE HEATHEN. “ All souls are Mine ,” said the Almighty through the mouth of a prophet. And therefore, spite of the im- putation of heresy brought against it by our evangelical orthodoxy, we may still take home to our hearts the sublime invocation of the “ Universal Prayer” : “ Father of all; in every age; In every clime adored: By saint, by savage, or by sage ; Jehovah, Jove, or Lord.” The Jove of Pagan poets, and of popular superstition, was not Jehovah ; but when the worshipper knew no better, infinite Mercy had pity on his lack of knowl- edge, we may fain hope. For “ a man is accepted ac- cording to what he hath'’ says St. Paul, “and not accord- ing to what he hath not'' Yes; that is the rule of eternal Justice; — 11 according to what a man hath," of light, of knowledge, of opportunity, of moral power. These are the measure of a man’s responsibility : by these standards will every man be judged at last ; and not by privileges he had never known ; nor ever could have known. To whomsoever little has been given, from him shall little be required. For the God with whom we have to do is not a hard taskmaster, reap- ing where He has not sown, or gathering where lie has not strawed ; but is pitiful and compassionate towards all who are “ ignorant and out of the way.” 1 call your reason and conscience to witness, my friends, that these doctrines — which are not mine, but 1 1 is that sent me — are true and righteous. Yet are they denounced by the rulers of our evangelical syna- gogues as loose and lawless ; or as perilous to the souls of those who receive them. Spite of the progress of ORTHODOXY AND THE HKATUEN. !) liberal thought ami feeling in theology, the ohl fanat- ical faith which doomed all heathen peoples indiscrim- inately to eternal agony, is reasserted to-day. Among enlightened Christian men generally, the terribly in- human things which somehow got into the creeds of the churches, are allowed to fall into forgetfulness. Very few men can be found to-day who really believe in the inevitable damnation of unbaptized infants; or who accept the notion of an absolute predestination of a few men to everlasting life, and of the vast majority to the horrors of an everlasting hell. But among our Christian llabbis, there is a strong attachment felt still for the cruel notions once generally taught in the name of a God of mercy. Most vehemently do they condemn the cherishing of pity for the heathen. Teachers of the “ New Theology ” I referred to just now, have timidly suggested the possibility of salva- tion hereafter for the better representatives of the Pagan world ; or that all who have failed from no fault of their own in this life, will have “ a chance” of attaining to favor in the life to come. But these teachers are denounced as traitors to God’s truth. No sympathy must be suffered for the “ sheep having no shepherd ” ; for the millions of God’s children who have lived and died in ignorance of Christ’s Gospel. They have had little or no light to guide them to His feet. Their lot has been bitterly hard, as a rule. They have lived in misery mostly; and died in despair: but we are to feel no compassion for them, say our Pharisees; except in a theologically legitimate way. There is no hope for them in God’s mercy. Nothing awaits them on leaving this world, but the lake that burneth with fire ! 10 ORTHODOXY AND THE HEATHEN. Great God ! how remorselessly cruel our theologies have been ! What a passion for vengeance has possessed men professing to believe in a Gospel of love ! No wonder that men trained in the narrowest of our sects are becoming restive, under demands made upon their faith by creeds which contradict the spirit and teaching of the Lord Jesus. Thanks be to God for the large liberty of the “ Apostles’ Creed ” ; for the blessed immunity secured to us thereby, from the des- potism of ecclesiastics and theologians ! for the larger hope we are permitted to cherish, in forecasting the destiny of vast multitudes of men who have groped their way to the grave through the gloom of heathen- ism. Witnesses for this better hope have been found in all ages among the great teachers of the Christian Church. The so-called “ New Theology ” is not new. Those who know the best and strongest men in the Anglican Church, are familiar with broad and humane views on the questions I am handling. Good learning makes men liberal, in looking back into history, or round on the living world of mankind. Spite of the restraints he acknowledged, Erasmus dared to say, that he felt like exclaiming : — “ O sancte Socrates: ora pro nobis” as he pondered what Plato reports of the great sage. To the unreasoning faith of the darker ages, generally, there was no salvation for men outside of the visible Church. But a more generous feeling had possessed some of the wisest and best of the Church “fathers.” Even the severe Tertullian could speak of minds “naturally Christian ” / acknowledg- ing his indebtedness to the writings of Seneca. But by Justin, the Alexandrian Clement, Origen, and by ORTHODOXY ANT) THE HEATHEN. 11 others, the great ethical teachers of the Pagan world were held to have been forerunners of the Christ ; pre- paring Ilis way, and “making Ilis paths straight.” Speaking of those at whose feet he had sat in the schools of philosophy, or from whose writings he had gathered wisdom, Justin said: — “ These men are not Atheists , but Christians." Nay; older than the “ fathers ” is this “ New Theology.” The Apostle Peter, though not yet fully delivered from bondage to Rab- binic Judaism, learned by the call of the Gentile cen- turion Cornelius, that “ in every nation ” there were souls acceptable to God. While a greater than Peter uses language of the heathen which I marvel how men to-day can reconcile with their cruel creeds. For “ when the Gentiles do by nature the things contained in the law,” says St. Paul, “ these having not the law, are a law unto themselves / which show the work of the law written in their hearts ; their consciences also bearing witness ; and their thoughts the meanwhile accusing or else excusing one another ! ” But I may be reminded, that “ there is none other name given among men whereby they may be saved , but the name of Jesus.” True, my friend : but how know you how far the virtue of that name extends ? Far beyond the limits of your little Christendom, historic, or actual. For St. John said of the Christ, that He was “ the true light that lighteth every man that someth into the world." We have good ground to hope, there- fore that multitudes of men who never heard the name will be saved by it. Does that seem a strange thing for me to say ? It will no longer seem strange, if you will only consider the sanction which we have from 12 ORTHODOXY AND THE HEATHEN. the Lord Jesus Himself for this larger hope. In the solemn forecasting of the last judgment which we have in St. Matthew, Jesus tells us of those who shall hear the benediction of the Judge upon the good deeds they had done with wonder ; and who shall disclaim that they had ever knowingly done Him the service so ap- proved. In answer to which the Judge shall say — and that Judge will be our Saviour, Christ — “Inasmuch as ye did it unto one of the least of these little onts, ye did it unto Mel" And these shall go away “ into life eternal.” Thank God that His mercy is wider and deeper than our theoretical knowledge of Him : wider than any system, ecclesiastical or theological, which has represented Him to the world. “ Other sheep I have,” said Jesus, “which are not of this fold.” “God fulfils Himself in many ways.” Not only “ at sundry times,” but “ in divers manners” has He spoken to men. Not only through Hebrew prophets and Christian apostles ; but through the lips of Pagan philosophers also. These men too, in their own measure, were lights shining in dark places. For human reason is a “ candle of the Lord”', led by which light, and having “done by nature the things contained in the law,” multitudes shall come forth at last “ out of every nation, and people, and tongue; and “ shall sit down with Abraham and Isaac and Jacob,” and with all saints, in the home of the Father in heaven. Amen. » %*