mMM 938.^7 JZSS in th^ Citttu of ll^nr IJovk l^ibrary Cohxxx.,^f ^ III wcTuJ C TITLE PAGE OF FIRST COETUS MINUTES September 29, 1747. MINUTES AND LETTERS THE COETUS (German Heformcb Congregations IB PENNSYLVANIA 1747-1792. TOGETHEK WITH THREE PRELIMINARY REPORTS OF REV. JOHN PHILIP BOEHM, 1734-1744. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE EASTERN SYNOD OF THE REFORMED CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES. REFORMED CHURCH PUBLICATION BOARD, PHILADELPHIA. 1903. Copyright, 1903, REFORMED CHURCH PUBLICATION BOARD. PREFACE. ^ The collection of historical documents contained in this " volume is all that remains of the official papers of the " Coetus of Pennsylvania. ' ' By this name, which means a convention, the organization of the Reformed churches in Pennsylvania was known in the eighteenth century. During the forty-five years of its existence (1747-1792), the Coetus stood in closest connection with the Reformed Church of Holland. It was one of the many mission fields of that great missionary Church. It enjoyed, during that time, not only the guidance and care of the ' ' Fathers ' ' in Holland, but also received men and means to carry on the work. To this unselfish liberality of the Holland Church, the Reformed Church of Pennsylvania owes not only its existence, but also the preservation of its official records. In return for the many acts of kindness re ceived from Holland, the Coetus of Pennsylvania was ex- pected to send yearly reports of its meetings and of the prog- ress of its work to Holland. These records were most care- fully preserved. Thus it has come to pass that, while many of the minutes and letters were lost in Pennsylvania, nearly all of them were preserved in Holland. By combining the remaining documents in Pennsylvania with those in Hol- land, the present collection has been formed. The gathering of so many documents, from such widely Q, separated sources, has been attended with much expenditure ^ of money and labor. It was only made possible by the liber- ri ality and zeal of the Rev. J. I. Good, D. D., who deserves the g gratitude of the Church for his unselfish labor. In the in- ^ troduction, he himself tells the interesting story how the docH- ^ ments in Holland were found and copied. ^ The publication of these documents is the outcome of the interest aroused by the excellent historical exhibit, held in (iii) CQ cs> •K> iv FEE FACE. connection with the sessions of the Eastern Synod of the Re- formed Church, in Philadelphia, on October 16-21, 1901. This interesting exhibit, so ably superintended by the Rev. James Crawford, D. D., showed how much precious material, bearing on the history of our Church, was still in existence. The historical interest, then exhibited, culminated in an "His torical Meeting, ' ' held in Heidelberg Reformed church, Phila- delphia, on October 18, 1901, at 8 P. M. At this meeting the suggestion was first made, by the writer, to bring about some permanent results of the exhibit by the publication of the old Coetus Minutes and the reorganization of the defunct His- torical Society. Both suggestions were carried out. With regard to the former, a special committee was appointed by Synod, consisting of the Rev. James Crawford, D. D., Rev. Prof. Wm. J. Hinke, and the Rev. Prof. J. H. Dubbs, D. D., to supervise the publication of the Coetus Minutes. Unfortunately, complications arose which prevented the carrying out of the resolution of Synod. At the next meeting of Synod, in 1902, the committee brought in new recommen- dations, which were at once adopted by Synod, In accord- ance with them the work was begun. The editing of the volume was entrusted by the com- mittee to the Rev. J. I. Good, D. D., and the Rev. Prof. Wm. J. Hinke. They spent much time and effort in securing good translations and in presenting the work in as accurate a form as possible. The translations had to be made from Latin, German and Dutch originals, and frequently the obscurity of the original made the work of translation extremely difficult. However, it is believed that by persistent efforts all difficul- ties were successfully overcome. As to the translation itself, it need only be said that it was the aim of the editors to make it as literal as possible, without doing violence to the English idiom. To obviate much confusion in the spelling of geo- graphical terms, the present mode of spelling was adopted, except where there was any doubt as to the identity of the place. In names of persons, the English form was substi- tuted for the German or Dutch in the baptismal or Christian name, but the various spellings of the surnames were retained. In the work of rendering the various documents into read- PBEFACE. V able English, the editors had the efiScieiit assistance of the Kev. John H. Secliler, D. D., who kindly read the whole manu- script as it passed through the press. The committee did not deem it wise to eliminate all refer- ences to the various cases of discipline which occur in the minutes. They are not only an important and necessary part of the record, without which it would be incomplete and to some extent unintelligible, but they also reflect great credit upon the Coetus, because they show how high was the stand- ard of morality among its ministers and how zealous they were to maintain it at all hazards and under all circumstances. The importance of these records for the history of our church can hardly be exaggerated. They are absolutely in- dispensable. Without them no connected history of the church as a whole and of the individual congregations would be pos- sible. To show the scope of their contents a few statements will be sufficient. They refer to all the ministers who were members of the Coetus of Pennsylvania, and now enable us for the fir.st time to give the exact number, sixty- four in all. Of these twenty-nine were educated in Pennsylvania and thirty-five, educated in Germany and Switzerland, were sent over by the church of Holland. Tw'O others, who were sent over, (Muentz and Pick) never entered our church, the first dying on the way and the second joining the Coetus of New York. Besides these, twenty-four independent Reformed ministers are mentioned, that is nearly half of those that are known. Four students of theology and seven school teachers complete the list of the leaders of our church during the Coetus period. Of Reformed congregations we find two hundred and three mentioned. Of these two were in New York, ten in New Jersey, twelve in ^Maryland, fourteen in Virginia, and all the rest in Pennsylvania. However, it must be remembered that the number of names does not represent the actual number of congregations, as several names were often applied to the same congregation in the course of its history. We may say, therefore, that in round numbers we find here the record of about one hundred and fifty Reformed congregations in Penn- sylvania, besides those in the other States already mentioned. vi PEE FACE. The interest of the Reformed people in civil affairs is shown in the elegant Latin address, presented to Governor Morris in 1754, and the appropriate address to Washington in 1789, together with his beautiful reply. In the sphere of education the Coetus of Pennsylvania showed its advanced position in the interest it took in the charity schools, 1754-1760, and in the establishment of Frank- lin College in 1787. Thus tlie new records throw a flood of light upon the re- ligious, social and political life of the German Reformed people during the eighteenth century. Finally, in presenting the complete work to the Church, the committee expresses the hope that its publication may lead to an increased interest in our history, and that in course of time other valuable documents, which have been collected in this country as well as abroad, may be published under the auspices of the venerable mother Synod. In thus honoring the memory of our fathers, we shall become their worthy suc- cessors in the work of the Lord. In the name of the Committee, Wm. J. HlNKE. INTRODUCTION. I. The Discovery of the Documents in Holland, BY the rev. J. I, GOOD;, D. D. The story of historical research often reads like a romance, and I give the discovery of the Holland records that it may perhaps be an inspiration to others. For nearly twenty years I had been ransacking Germany and Switzerland to find materials for the basis of the history of our Church in America. But the missing Coetus Minutes eluded me. Finally, through the suggestion of the excellent historian of the Dutch Reformed Church, Rev. E. T. Corwin, D. D., I was led to write to Holland as early as 1892. I wrote to Rev. Dr. Vos and to Rev. Dr. Rutgers, of Amsterdam, both of whom said there were some records about Pennsylvania at Amsterdam. In July, 1895, I visited Amsterdam and ar- ranged to have the portfolio of Pennsylvania papers copied. But when they came to me the next ^vinter I was greatly dis- appointed, because of the many missing Coetus Minutes only two came to hand. In the meantime Mr. Henry S. Dotterer, of Philadelphia, had gone abroad for researches connected with the " Perkiomen Region." He wrote to me that at the Hague, in the archives of the General Synod, I might find many interesting documents, as he had gone over them cur- sorily in his work, but had not dwelt upon them, as his interest was local, not ecclesiastical. I visited the Hague in the sum- mer of 1896. I shall never forget the day, Monday, July 6, 1896, when the courteous keeper of the archives, Mr. Over- man, laid before me the books and the bundles of the Penn- sylvania correspondence. There, at last, were the long-sought (vii). viii INTBODUCTION. Coetus Minutes, and scores of other letters, whose significance I did not know then, but appeared afterwards (as given in my last volume, ' ' The History of the Reformed Church in the United States "). I was dazed. It was the embarrassment of historical riches. Wliat Mayer and Harbaugh and other historians of our Church had long sought for but never found, I was permitted to be the first of her ministers to see. That day ran out into weeks, as I stayed and copied the CoetuB Minutes, and came home with the complete set. Later, I learned that I had been misled (though they meant it well) by our Dutch brethren in America, who had been telling me all the time to go to Amsterdam. It turned out that the Dutch Church in this country had been most closely allied with the Classis of Amsterdam, but our own Church had been more closely allied with the Synod of South Holland, and, therefore, most of the records were at the Hague instead of at Amsterdam, So anxious was I to get these reieords for the information of our Church in America, that the next year (1897) I sent Rev. Prof. Hinke to Holland to copy them, and he proved a most painstaking and efficient helper in this work. Finally, in 1898, I not only sent him, but also went myself, in order to complete, if possible, the transcript of all the records; so that by 1899 I had copied virtually the whole of the Holland records, making about 4,000 pages. The total expense of the copying, translating, etc., together with the expense of Prof. Hinke, amounted to about $4,000, which, however, I cheer- fully paid if thereby I could serve our Church, that her early history might be cleared of mistakes, false traditions and mere surmises, and be placed on the solid basis of fact. " All things come to him who seeks them, ' ' provided he seeks them long enough and happens to stumble over them as I did. May this recital of the romance of our history stimulate others to persevering research in the many avenues of our his- tory in this country ! History is a sacred trust of Providence to us. Let us prove ourselves worthy of God's confidence in us. INTnODUCTION. ix II. Reformed Archives, by rev. prof. wm. j. hinke. The documents published in this volume have been gath- ered, with but few exceptions, from four different archives, two of which are in Holland and two in America. It will serve a useful purpose if we present a short account of each of these archives, arranging them in the order of their im- portance. I. ARCHIVES AT THE HAGUE, HOLLAND. These archives, which are the property of the General Synod of the Reformed Church of Holland, are now located in the " Synodical Building," at 100 Java street, in the Hague. The largest part of the valuable documents there preserved was formerly the property of the South Holland Synod, but when the Synod ceased to exist, in 1816, the archives passed into the custody of the General Synod. At first they were kept in the Cloister church, at the Hague, but were later transferred to their present location. It is not a large collec- tion of documents, but, in contents, it is unquestionably one of the most important in the country. All the important manu- scripts are kept in two large iron safes on the first floor. Some old books and documents, lately added to the collection, are preserved in bookcases standing in the same room. To make this collection more accessible to students of history, the General Synod of the Holland Church ordered the publica- tion of a catalogue, which appeared in 1878, under the editor- ship of the Rev. H. Q. Janssen.* The catalogue shows that the whole material has been arranged under one hundred and four numbers. Among them the original minutes of the six early national Synods, from 1568-1586, deserve special men- tion, because by these Synods the Church was organized and the symbols of faith were adopted. Of other numbers. No. 17 is the most noteworthy, being a collection of seventeen large * This book is entitled : Catalogus van het Oud Synodaal Archief. Met Indices der oude Provinciale KerTcelyTce Archieven. 'b Gravenhage, 1878. K. INTEODUCTION, manuscript volumes, containing the Acts of the famous Synod of Dort, 1618-1619. The documents which are of special importance for the Reformed Church of Pennsylvania are the following: 1. Tlie Acts of the South Holla^id Synod. They are contained in seventeen large folio volumes, under No. 20 of the catalogue, each volume having from 600-800 closely-written pages. They cover the years 1576-1810, with but one break, from 1609-1617, when no meetings were held. The churches of Pennsylvania are first mentioned in 1728, vrith w^hich year volume eight begins. From that date till 1810 the affairs of the Pennsylvania churches were regularly taken up by the Synod in each annual session, and hence the accounts of these deliberations cover many pages. A full transcript of all items referring to Pennsylvania was secured. 2. The Acts of the Synod of North Holland. The minutes of the North Holland Synod cover fifteen folio volumes from 1621-1790, with loose copies of the minutes of 1791-1793 and 1795-1809.* A more complete set of these minutes is preserved at Amsterdam, comprising nineteen folio volumes, extending from 1572-1810. The early minutes of all the pro\dncial Synods from 1571-1620 were printed in eight octavo volumes at Groningen, 1891-1899, edited by Rev. Messrs. Reitsma and Van Veen. The first reference to Penn- sylvania in the minutes of the North Holland Synod is in 1728. From that date until 1810 there were annual reports about the condition of the Church in Pennsylvania, all of which were copied. 3. Acts of the Deputies of Both Synods. The Synod of North and Louth Holland had a joint execu- tive committee, called " Deputati utriusque Synodi." Four members from South Holland and two from North Holland constituted this committee. They met quarterly in joint ses- sions, but the South Holland Deputies met alone every month. At first the minutes of these two kinds of meetings, called ordinaiy and extraordinary respectively, were kept in the * No. 52, according to the catalogue. INTRODUCTION. xi same set of volumes, but in 1761 the South Holland Deputies began a separate set for their extraordinary meetings. Hence, we have (under Nos. 32-33 of the catalogue) : a. Acta Deputatorum utriusque Synodi : Vol. I. 1641-1651.* Vol. IX. 1738-1746. II. 1654-1666. X. 1746-1752. III. 1667-1674, is missing. XI. 1752-1756. IV. 1674-1694. XII. 1756-1758. V. 1694-1713. XIII. 1758-1761. VI. 1713-1723. XIV. 1761-1787. VII. 1724-1730. XV. 1787-1808. VIII. 1730-1738. h. Acta Deputatorum Zuid Hollandiae extraordinaria : Vol. I. 1761-1770. Vol. IV. 1787-1792. II. 1770-1780. V. 1792-1803. III. 1780-1787. VI. 1803-1816. These minutes of the SjTiodical Deputies are of utmost im- portance for our history, because they contain the full story of what the Church of Holland did for the Reformed people of Pennsylvania. The reports in the minutes of the Synods are only summarized statements of the work of the Deputies during the course of the year. It is to the minutes of the Deputies that we must turn for the full record. Here we find elaborate accounts of the steps taken to secure thirty- seven ministers for Pennsylvania. Here the receipt of every letter from Pennsylvania is noted, sometimes given in ex- stract, but in important cases spread in full upon the minutes. Here we also find extracts of all the letters sent to Pennsyl- vania in answer to the reports received, as well as the reports of the moneys devoted annually to this cause. In fact, we have here the full machinery that kept our Church in motion. The minutes of the Coetus of Pennsylvania will always re- main more or less obscure, unless these minutes of the Depu- ties be published which supply the missing links. Here are the causes of which many of the actions of the Coetus were the result. * Xo Minutes of 1652 and 1653 are in existence. Xii INTRODUCTION. 4. Correspondence of the Synodical Deputies. The correspondence of the Deputies with the churches in Pennsylvania (but also containing letters exchanged between the different ecclesiastical bodies in Holland) is at present preserved in two bound volumes, one portfolio and one bundle of loose letters.* The bound volumes (74, I and 74, II) contain, according to the catalogue, 98 and 50 numbers respectively. But, as often several documents are put under one number, the whole num- ber of separate documents is somewhat larger, namely 164, covering the years 1731-1754. The remaining letters, and especially the minutes of the Pennsylvania Coetus, are preserved in bundle 92 B, contain- ing 169 separate documents of the years 1752-1790. There is only one document in this bundle of an earlier date, a peti- tion from York, written on October 26, 1748. Finally, the portfolio No. 86 contains 17 later documents, from 1790-1806, most of them referring to the distribution of the Pennsylvania funds held by the Synods. 5. Account Books of the Synods. Two account books, under No. 75, give full statements of how the Pennsylvania funds were accumulated, invested, ap- plied to the needs of the Pennsylvania churches, and finally distributed among the different Synods according to the ratio of their contributions. II. THE ARCHIVES AT AMSTERDAM, HOLLAND. The archives of the Classis of Amsterdam are located in the " Nieuwe Kerk, " near the royal palace. They contain the following sets of documents relating to the churches of Penn- sylvania : 1. The Acts of the (Old) Classis of Amsterdam. The minutes of the Classis cover eighteen folio volumes, closely written, extending from 1582-1810. From 1728-1810 (or in Vols. X-XVIII) are found many, but mostly short, refer- ences to Pennsylvania, beginning with the application for * For a photograph of these records, taken by the writer, see The Be- formed Church in Pennsylvania, by Eev. Dr. J. H. Dubbs, facing p. 200. INTRODUCTION . XIU Rev. Mr. Boehm's ordination and ending with the distribution of the Pennsylvania funds. 2. The Acts of the Classical Deputies. As the Synods, so the Classis had an executive committee, or, perhaps, more properly speaking, a board of foreign missions, whose members were called " Deputati ad res exteras." At a later date the Deputies for Pennsylvania became a separate committee. The work of these Deputies is recorded in six folio volumes, numbered XX-XXV, Beginning with Volume XXII, we have many references to Pennsylvania. These vol- umes contain not only the minutes of the Deputies, but also numerous extracts of letters from foreign churches. Some of the volumes present, indeed, a curious medley of minutes and letters. 3. Classical Correspondence. The Deputies of the Classis did not only keep copies of all the letters sent to foreign churches, but they also made ex- tracts, in Dutch, of all the letters received from abroad. Hence we have again two sets of volumes: a. The copy-books of letters sent to foreign churches. There are seven consecutive volumes of such letters, numbered according to the inventory. Vols. XXVI-XXXII, and cover- ing the years 1648-1804. These volumes contain copies of hundreds of letters, of which thirty-two are addressed to the ministers and churches of Pennsylvania. h. The following volumes contain extracts of letters from foreign churches: Vol. XXXIII, 1759-1780, and Vol. XXXIV, 1780-1792. Vol. XXXV is entirely devoted to Pennsylvania, containing 146 letters, both from Pennsylvania and Holland, covering the years 1752-1772. At the other end of the volume the cor- responding Acts of the Pennsylvania Deputies are entered. Another volume, containing the letters and Acts of the Penn- sylvania Deputies from 1772-1792, is apparently missing. Besides these bound volumes of correspondence, there are twenty-five portfolios of original letters from all over the world. According to the Rev. E. T. Corwin, D. D.,* the fol- * See Ecclesiastical Records of the State of New YorTc, p. 22, f. xiv INTRODUCTION. lowing countries are represented: Four portfolios containing letters from the East Indies, three from Ceylon, seven from the West Indies, two from Curacao and Surinam, one from the smaller islands of the West Indies, two from the Cape of Good Hope, three from North America, of which two contain the letters of the Dutch Reformed churches of New York and New Jersey, and, finally, one portfolio, with eighty-eight documents, relating to the Reformed churches of Pennsyl- vania. To these twenty-five other documents have recently been added, which were found by Dr. Corwin in one of the New York portfolios. The newly-found letters are especially welcome, because they cover the earliest period, from 1727- 1745. These are the documents relating to the Reformed Church of Pennsylvania which are preserved in Holland. III. THE ARCHIVES AT NEW BRUNSWICK, N. J. In 1841 the State of New York sent the Hon. J. R. Brod- head to Europe to secure transcripts of original documents relating to the history of New York in England, Holland and France, He was also requested by the Rev. Dr. Thomas DeWitt, one of the pastors of the Collegiate Reformed Church of New York, to search the archives of the Classis of Amster- dam for documents bearing on the history of the Dutch Re- formed Church. As the result of his mission, Brodhead ob- tained about nine hundred pages of transcripts from the Acts of the Classis and the Classical correspondence, and also seven bundles of original letters from America, which the Classis at first loaned, and in 1846 presented, to the Dutch Reformed Church. Among these bundles were two with letters from Pennsylvania.* The documents arrived in Amer- ica in September, 1842, being delivered into the custody of Dr. DeWitt, In the next month the Synod of the Reformed Church, in session at Lewisburg, instructed its delegates to the Synod of the Dutch Reformed Church " respectfully to ask of that body the use of the documents recently received by them from Holland." (Minutes of 1842, p. 19.) In the * See Amsterdam Correspondence, by Dr. E. T. Corwin, in Vol. VIII of the Transactions of the American Society of Church History, p. 92, ff. INTRODUCTION. xrv following year they were loaned to Rev. Dr. Le"\vis Mayer. According to a note in his copy-book, he received them on June 22, 18-13. He copied them carefully into two bounfl volumes, known as the " Mayer Manuscripts." After the death of Dr. jMayer, Synod made strenuous efforts to secure his manuscripts, and finally succeeded, in 1856, when the special committee, appointed for this purpose, reported that they had secured the said documents, " consisting of the man- uscript volumes, transcribed with great labor and care from original sources, together with original letters, copies of J\fin- utes of Coetus, etc." (Minutes of 1856, p. 90.) Dr. Har- baugh used these volumes extensively in the preparation of his " Fathers of the Reformed Church." Unfortunately, the second volume has since been lost. The first volume contains copies of sixty-two documents, from 1738-1775. They are of more than usual importance, because a number of original's have been lost. When Dr. DeTVitt died, the documents were transferred to the archives of the Dutch Reformed Church in the Sage Library at New Brunswick, N. J. According to the index of Dr. Corwin, there ought to be seventy-four docu- ments in this collection, but hardly sixty have survived, ex- tending from 1738-1783. The documents published from this collection in the present volume are marked with the initials N. B. IV. THE HARBAUGH MANUSCRIPTS. The nucleus of the Harbaugh collection, which was until re- cently at Lancaster, represents, without question, the rem- nants of the Coetus archives. In 1817 the Synod of the Re- formed Church passed the following resolution: ' ' AVliereas, the letters and documents of Synod have much increased, it was resolved to deposit them in the archives of the Reformed Church at Lancaster, where some are preserved already, and to ask the present minister. Rev. Mr. Hoffmeier, clerk of Synod, to hand them to the consistory, with the re- quest not to surrender any without the express order of Synod." (Minutes of 1817. Session IV, article 11.) That this resolution of SjTiod was carried out is shoAvn by the fact that twenty-two credentials of elders attending the XVI INTRODUCTION. Synod of 1816 and thirty-six credentials of 1817 are now in the Harbaugh collection. Synod continued to deposit docu- ments at Lancaster till 1823, after which date the archives at Lancaster seem to have been completely forgotten till 1838, when Synod met in Lancaster. At that meeting a committee was appointed " to examine the documents in the archives at Lancaster, written in the Low Dutch language, and of which it is not known whether they belong to Synod or to the con- gregation." (Minutes of 1838, p. 54.) In the following year the committee, consisting of Rev. Dr. Willers and elder H. Puntius, made a lengthy report about nine Dutch letters, seven of which were claimed as the property of Synod. In the following year Synod ordered their translation and pub- lication. They appeared in pamphlet form, under the title: " Letters from Holland connected with the first organization of the German Reformed Church in the United States of North America. Chambersburg, 1841." It was the first effort of Synod to publish historical documents. The letters thus printed are the following numbers in the Harbaugh collection : Nos. 46, 59, 62, 63, 65, 71, 72. Afterwards the records of the Coetus were indexed by Dr. L. Mayer, as is shown by his en- dorsements on many of the Harbaugh documents. He also states, in a note on p. 151 of his own manuscripts: " I find since that the autographs or copies, or both autographs and copies, were deposited in the Coetal archives at Lancaster, where most of them were lost." The collection numbered at that time at least forty-seven documents, for that number was put by Dr. Mayer on what is now Harbaugh MSS. No. 95. When Dr. H. Harbaugh was pastor of the First church at Lancaster, 1850-1860, not only the documents in the archives of the congregation, but also the Mayer MSS., passed into his keeping. With their help he wrote his excellent " Life of Rev. Michael Schlatter " and the first two volumes of the " Fathers of the Reformed Church." After the death of Dr. Harbaugh, the documents which he had collected were presented by his widow to the Rev. U. H. Heilman, then her pastor at Lewisburg. In a recent letter Rev. IVIr. Heilman states : ' ' After the volume had been in my possession for ten or more years, I sent it to Dr. Dubbs, at INTBODUCTION. Xvii Lancaster, for the use of the Historical Society of our Church. It remained there until Dr. Dubbs informed me that the Soci- ety had been dissolved. I suggested to Dr. Dubbs, and he assented to this, that he should return the volume to me, which he did in due time." Examining the volume more carefully, we find that it con- sists of three main parts. First the records of the Coetus of Pennsylvania, from 1771-1793, in all forty-six documents, or the following numbers in the collection: Nos. 30, 31, 37, 41, 45, 46, 48-52, 55-68, 70-77, 79-81, 83, 85-87, 89-92, 94. Sec- ondly, the records of the congregation at Lancaster, consisting of twenty letters addressed to the consistory, or Nos. 7-16, 25-28, 33, 42, 47, 78, 95, 140. Thirdly, the documents gath- ered by Dr. Harbaugh himself from many different sources. Rev. Dr. Wm. Helffrich presented fifteen letters to him in October, 1857, as is shown by a note on document No. 88. Rev. Y. H. Fries presented ten, Rev. John W. Weber four, Rev. Thomas Pomp three, and Rev. George Wack two docu- ments. The whole collection, indexed by the writer under 144 numbers, contains in all about 200 separate documents. It is certainly the most important collection of German Re- formed documents in this country, and it is indeed fortunate that it has safely survived its checkered history. Twenty- seven of its documents are published in the present volume. TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE 1. 1734, October 18. First Keport of Boehm (Dutch) 1 2. 1739, January 14. Second Eeport of Boehm (German) 6 3. 1744, July 8. Third Eeport of Boehm (Dutch) 17 4. 1747, Sept. 29, ff. Minutes of First Coetus (German) 32 5. 1748, Sept. 28, ff. Minutes of Coetus held in Phila. (German). 39 6. ' ' Nov. 21. Coetal Letter (German) 47 7. *' " Constitution of Coetus (German) 49 8. 1749, Oct. 20-24. Extract from Schlatter 's Journal (Dutch) . . 53 9. " Oct. 23. Schlatter's Commission to write Minutes (Dutch) 54 10. ' ' Oct. 22. Decision of Coetus in favor of Schlatter (Dutch) 55 11. " Oct. 23. Eesolution of Coetus in Lancaster case (Ger- man) 57 12. " Oct. 24. Schlatter exonerated in Eeiflf case (German).. 58 13. 1750, Nov. 16, ff. Extract from Schlatter's Journal (Dutch). 60 14. " Dec. 13. Letter of Coetus to Lancaster congregation (German) 60 15. 1751, Sept. 12. Eeference to Coetus of 1751 (Dutch) 62 16. 1752, Aug. 10-13. Minutes of Special Coetus (Dutch) 63 17. " Oct. 18-24. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster (Dutch) 65 18. " Dec. 12. Minutes of Special Coetus (Dutch) 79 19. 1753, April 26-27. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster (Dutch) 85 20. " Oct. 9-10. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster (Dutch). 91 21. " Oct. 10-12. Minutes of Eival Coetus at Cocalico (Dutch). 106 22. 1754, Oct. 30 to Nov. 2. Minutes of Coetus held in Philadelphia (Dutch) 114 23. " Nov. 3. Coetal Letter sent to Synods (Dutch) 119 24. " Nov. 2. Address of Coetus to Governor Morris (Latin). 120 25. " Dec. 17. Coetal Letter sent to Classis (Dutch) 121 26. 1755, April 9-11. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster (Dutch). 123 27. ' ' June. Coetal Letter sent to Classis (Dutch) 132 28. " Oct. 8. Minutes of Special Coetus (Latin) 133 29. 1756, June 15-17. Minutes of Coetus held in Philadelphia (Latin) 140 (xix) EX TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE 30. " June 16. Letter of Coetus to Franklin (English) 148 31. " " Distribution of Donations (Latin) 149 32. 1757, June 8-9. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster, includ- ing Minutes of Special Coetus, Aug. 24 (Latin) 150 33. " Sept. 30. Coetal Letter sent to Classis (Latin) 162 34. 1758, Sept. 14-16. Minutes of Coetus held in Phila. (Latin) . . 165 35. ' ' Oct. 17. Coetal Letter sent to Synods (Latin) 169 36. 1759, March 31. Distribution of Donations (Latin) 172 37. " Oct. 9. Minutes of Coetus held in Goshenhoppen (Latin). 173 38. 1760, May 28. Minutes of Special Coetus (Dutch) 184 39. " " Letter of thanks addressed to P. Stein (Dutch) . . 189 40. " Oct. 21-22. Minutes of Coetus held in Germantown (Dutch) 191 41. 1761, June 24-25. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster (Dutch). 196 42. " " Distribution of Donations (Dutch) 200 43. " " Eeport of Alsentz on State of Church (Dutch) 202 44. 1762, June 30, ff. Minutes of Coetus held at New Hanover (German) 204 45. " Oct. 27. Coetal Letter sent to Synods (German) 211 46. 1763, May 5-6. Minutes of Coetus held in Germantown (Dutch) 213 47. " June 18. Eesolution of Coetus on Mr. Eothenbuhler (English) 218 48. " Oct. 24. Minutes of Special Coetus (Dutch) 220 49. 1764, May 2-3. Minutes of Coetus held in Phila. (Dutch) 223 50. " Sept. 12. Extract from Minutes of Special Coetus (Dutch) ■ 228 51. " Dec. 18. Letter of Coetus to Lancaster congregation (German) 230 52. 1765, May 8-9. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster (Dutch). 231 53. " Oct. 16-17. Minutes of Special Coetus (Dutch) 238 54. 1766, Sept. 3-4. Minutes of Coetus held in Beading (Dutch) . . 242 55. 1767, Sept. 16-17. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster (Ger- man) 252 56. 1768, Sept. 7-9. Minutes of Coetus held in Easton (German) . . 260 57. " " Coetal Letter sent to Synods (German) 273 58. 1769, Sept. 20-21. Minutes of Coetus held in Germantown (German) 279 59. " Sept. 20-21. Coetal Letter sent to Synods (German) 292 60. 1770, Sept. 19-21. Minutes of Coetus held in Phila. (German). 295 61. " Dec. 7. Coetal Letter sent to Synods (German) 304 62. 1771, Oct. 9-10. Minutes of Coetus held in Eeading (German). 307 63. ' ' Oct. 10. Coetal Letter sent to Synods (German) 322 64. 1772, June 17-18. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster (Ger- man) 324 TABLE OF CONTENTS. , xxi PAGK 65. 1773, Oct. 27-28. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster (Ger- man) 335 66. ' ' Nov. 26. Coetal Letter sent to Synods and Classis (Ger- man) 340 67. 1774, May 2-3. Minutes of Coetus held in Phila. (German) . . 343 68. " June 6. Coetal Letter sent to Synods and Classis (Ger- man) 347 69. 1775, May 10-11. Minutes of Coetus held in Lebanon (Ger- man) 349 70. " May 12. Coetal Letter sent to Synods and Classis (Ger- man) 352 71. 1776, May 1. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster (German). 353 72. " May 2. Coetal Letter sent to Classis (German) 357 73. 1777, April 28-29. Minutes of Coetus held in Beading (Ger- man) 359 74. ' ' April 29. Coetal Letter (German) 364 75. 1779, April 28-29. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster (Ger- man) , 366 76. " April 28-29. Coetal Letter sent to Synods (German)... 371 77. 1781, May 9. Minutes of Coetus held in Phila. (German) 372 78. 1782, May 1. Minutes of Coetus held in Reading (German) . . 376 79. " " Coetal Letter sent to Classis (German) 381 80. 1783, May 14-15. Minutes of Coetus held in Phila. (German). 382 81. 1784, May 12-13. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster (Dutch). 387 82. " May 13. Coetal Letter sent to Synods (Dutch) 392 83. 1785, April 27-28. Minutes of Coetus held in Reading (Ger- man) , 394 84. " April 29. Coetal Letter sent to Synods (German) 402 85. 1786, May 17-18. Minutes of Coetus held in Phila. (German). 405 86. " " Coetal Letter sent to Synods (German) 409 87. 1787, June 5-7. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster (Ger- man) 411 88. " June 5-7. Coetal Letter sent to Synods (German) 415 89. " June 2. Extract from accounts of Widows' Fund (Ger- man) 416 90. 1788, April 23-24. Minutes of Coetus held in Reading (Ger- man) 418 91. " April 23-24. Coetal Letter sent to Synods (German) 424 92. 1789, June 10-11. Minutes of Coetus held in Phila. (German). 427 93. " " Coetal Letter sent to Synods (German) 431 94. " " Address of Coetus to "Washington and his answer (English) 434 95. 1790, June 7-8. Minutes of Coetus held at Falkner Swamp (German) 436 96. " June 20. Coetal Letter sent to Synods (German) 441 97. " July 6. Report on contributions from Holland (German). 443 xxii ^ TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGZ 98. 1791, June 27-28. Minutes of Coetus held in Lancaster (Ger- man) 444 99, 1792, May 6-7. Minutes of Coetus held in Phila. (German) . . . 448 100. " " Congregational report of Eev. Mr. Helffrich (German) 452 BOEHM'S REPORT TO THE SYNODS. OCTOBER 18, 1734. (Hague 74, i. 18.) True and desired statistics of the German Reformed con- gregations in Pennsylvania, showing how many communicants were found at the last Lord's Supper in each congregation, draAvn up as follows by the undersigned : Congregations. Communicants. At Falkner Swamp were found, September 22, 1734 . . 63 At Skippack were found, September 29, 1734 41 At Whitemarsh were found, October 6, 1734 22 At Philadelphia were found, September 15, 1734 .... 88 At Germantown were found (according to the state- ment of two elders, named Minck and Bentzel), in the month of September, 1734. 30 At Conestoga were found, May 31, 1730 75 At Tulpehocken were found, June 28, 1728 27 At Goshenhoppen (according to the statement of some members) about 40 386 (I wish to state that certainly one-half of the communicants of these congregations arrived here not long ago, are poor people; and partly servants.) Further report from Pennsylvania regarding the above mentioned eight congregations, including besides them sev- eral places, which need to be provided for as much as possible, — these are : Oley, and also Saucon, in whose neighborhood are Macungie, ]\Iaxatawny and Great Swamp, where, not^vith- standing their being scattered very far apart, yet a consider- able number of people can come together. As the population increases other congregations may be organized ; for the pres- ent, however, although with much difficulty, they can suitably be served by four ministers in the following manner : 1. By one minister, Philadelphia and Germanto^vn, which are six Endish miles apart; and as Germantown is a very (1) 2 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. advantageous place, if the congregation there would fra- ternally unite with that of Whitemarsh (since they are very weak and but four English miles apart, and most of the people are going to live at Germantown) the same might very properly change its location [to Germantown], about which I, as the regular pastor at Whitemarsh, have already spoken to the elders of Whitemarsh, who also agree with me in ac- knowledging this to be beneficial and serviceable, and in case any order were given in this matter they would be willing to obey. By means of such a union they would also be in a better condition in due time to support a pastor themselves. 2. By the second minister, Falkner Swamp and Skippack, which are about twelve English miles apart; and if he would conduct services at each of these places once every three weeks, he might between times, and on one Sunday, according to opportunity, preach at Oley, and wherever it might be necessary. 3. By the third minister, Conestoga and Tulpehocken, and whereas Conestoga is spread over a great extent of territory (almost if not more than seventy English miles from Phila- delphia) , and has very many Reformed people, if they had a faithful pastor of their own they might then be united [into one charge], so that the pastor could conduct services at two or three places, as it might be deemed advisable, and besides have services every four weeks at Tulpehocken, which is eighteen miles distant. Now this was the condition of Conestoga and Tulpehocken at the period above mentioned when at their request I administered the Lord's Supper to them, and Conestoga accepted and subscribed to our Church- Order ; and although they were scattered by Mr. Peter Miller, I nevertheless hope, with the help of God, to restore them to their former condition. 4. A fourth minister would greatly be needed at Goshen- hoppen, about thirty-six miles from Philadelphia. He might conduct services there every three weeks, and use the rest of the time to feed the poor sheep at the end of the wilderness, in the above mentioned Saucon, Macungie, Maxatawny and Great Swamp, who thirst for the hearing of God's word as the dry earth for water. Many people from these regions have already been to see me in great sadness, and complained RECORDS OF 1734. o of the pitiable state of their souls. There were also some, who being: able to make the journey, have come at various times to communion in the cong:regation entrusted to me at Falkner Swamp, a distance of certainly twenty-five to thirty English miles, and brought children for baptism, which jour- ney, however, is impossible for old persons and weak or preg- nant women, so that it is not to be wondered at (especially when one remembers that there are children who for lack of a minister cannot be brought to baptism until they are several years of age) that my heart breaks and my eyes are full of tears about this condition. But I cannot accomplish this work alone, for my years are beginning to accumulate, and my poor body is also getting feeble, since I must not only make long journeys and preach, but also, because these poor people are not able to support me, I must support my large family with manual labor. It is indeed true that three young ministers have been here, namely, Mr. George Michael Weiss, Mr. Peter Miller, and Mr. Bartholomew Rieger, coming from the Palatinate, but for what they have done here I wish that God may forgive them, because, after they had disturbed the congregations for a long time, even those entrusted to my care, they again left and abandoned the sheep misled by their shepherds. Neverthe- less one of them is still in this country, namely, Peter Miller. When this man could not bring the people over to his opinion, he quitted the ministry altogether, and he is now a presser of oil (Oly-persser).* But what he was after, and thought of persuading the people to do, is plainly to be seen from this, overlooking everything else : about two years ago he went with one of his eldere, whom he had installed in the congrega- tion at Goshenhoppen, into the house of a Seventh Day Bap- tist, and there they allowed themselves to be called brethren and to have their feet washed by him ; and this is the truth, whereupon followed his complete degeneration. I have now, for about eight years, ministered in my poverty to the three congregations entrusted to me at Falkner Swamp. Skippack and Wliitemarsh, according to our Church-Order. * This phrase is obscure ; we give the literal translation and the original Dutch. 4 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. To them lias been added three months ago the congregation at Philadelphia, which has entered on all points into a firm and complete agreement with me. To this Church-Order none of the three above mentioned young ministers would sub- mit, but sought to live according to their own ideas, and Miller, in my own presence, has called the Heidelberg Cate- chism a work of men, adding that Christians were a free people, and had no need of a head on earth, that Christ in heaven was their only head, and that he would not allow himself to be subjected to a human yoke, etc. MeauAvhile the divisions which have hitherto prevailed have been, by God's grace, mostly overcome, and the united congregations and members live in peace. Those few who, in spite of every admonition, will not as yet unite in love, according to the rule of God's Sacred Word, we leave to their well-deserved judgment. Thus writes, acceording to truth, upon his inevitable re- sponsibility before the judgment-seat of God, he who esteems himself the least of all the servants of Jesus Christ, and un- worthy of the Sacred Gospel, and testifies by his own signa- ture. October 18, 1734. John Philip Boehm, Reformed Minister in Pennsylvania. These foregoing statistics, and the additional submissive report and the proposals made with due deference, we recog- nize, according to our bounden duty, as useful, and tending to promote the interests of our true church in Pennsylvania, and we agree with them in every respect. Moreover, we, the present ruling elders and deacons of the three congregations at Falkner Swamp, Skippack and AAHiitemarsh, recognize and honor the Rev. Mr. John Philip Boehm as a minister prop- erly ordained by the Rev. I\Iessrs. Gualther DuBois, Henry Boel and Vincent Antonides, ministers at New York and Long Island, Avhich was done at the order of the Rev. Classis of Amsterdam (to which Rev. Classis we sent a submissive petition concerning it). This ordination took place in the presence of three of us, as elders delegated for this purpose. We also recognize him as our pastor, regularly called, and as the faithful shepherd of our souls, who has hitherto admin- istered his office, under the greatest trials, in such a manner FiECORDS OF 1734. 5 that we cannot complain in the least about any neglect on his part. We wish that the good Lord may graciously preserve him among us for many years in the same fidelity and zeal to the best interests of his Church. This we sign with our own hands, and dutifully confirm it, in Pennsylvania. Done in our consistory at Falkner Swamp, October 18, 1734. GosEN Thonis, Elder. Sebastian Reiffschneider, Elder. ■ SiGiSMUND Schmidt, Elder. John Herb, Elder. John Henry Schmidt, Deacon. John Drinktdenhengst,* Deacon. Done in our consistory at Skippack, October 27, 1734. John Ulric Stephen, Elder. Jacob Arent, Sr., Elder. Philip Henry Soeller, Elder. Christian Leeman, Elder. John Dintenmeyer, Deacon. Adam Kind, Deacon. Done in our consistory at Whitemarsh, October 28, 1734, William De Wees, Elder. Christofpel Ottinger, Elder. LuDWiG Knaus, Deacon. John Michael Gleim, Deacon. * Spelled thus in the original. BOEHM'S REPORT TO CLASSIS AND SYNODS. JANUAEY 14, 1739. (Amst. Portfolio, No. 3; Hague 74, i. 24.) After his Reverence, Mr. P. H. Dorsius, minister at Jamine [Neshaminy], in Bucks county, Pennsylvania, had shown to me, the undersigned, on the 28th of November, 1738, in his house at Neshaminy, the letters sent by the two Christian Synods of South and North Holland, and after his Reverence had read to me that the two Christian Synods for the sake of convenience had authorized and ordained him as inspector of the Pennsylvania Reformed congregations, his Reverence re- quested me to give a report on the following questions : 1. How many German Reformed congregations there are in Pennsylvania and how far they are from each other ? 2. How many elders, deacons and communicants there are in each congregation and how many are served by me ? 3. How the congregations are supplied with schoolmasters and precentors? Therefore I have considered myself under obligation to give his Reverence a dutiful specification and to make a full report concerning all other questions. As far as I know the congregations of the High German Reformed people in Pennsylvania are these : (1) Falkner Swamp (served by Boehm as regular minister) . In this congregation there are always four elders and two deacons. The Lord's Supper is administered twice a year. The communicants on September 17th, 1738, were 89. (2) Skippack (about twelve English miles from Falkner Swamp and served by Boehm as regular minister). In this congregation the same custom as to the Lord's Supper pre- vails. Communicants on September 24th, 1738, were 36. (3) Whitemarsh (about sixteen English miles from Skip- pack. This Whitemarsh is not more than four English miles from Germantown. Most of the people live still nearer, and are about ten miles from Philadelphia. Served by Boehm as regular minister). In this congregation there are only two (6)' RECORDS OF 17 S9. 7 elders and two deacons, on account of the small number of members, but as to the Lord's Supper the same custom pre- vails as in the other two congregations. Communicants on September 3d, 1738, were 29. N. B. With regard to the congregation at Skippack we must mention that it is so weak because for quite a time one after another has continued the confusion caused by Do.* Weis in the year 1728, which Henry Goetschi still continues at this time and preaches to the followers of Reiff (although there are very few of them) as if he were a regular minister. And still another, by the name of John William Straub, has also been bold enough to officiate as minister in all things. Through him a considerable number of people have been drawn away from the congregation. Otherwise it would be again as strong. (4) Philadelphia (is sei'ved by Boehm). It is six English miles from Germantown. This congregation has accepted the Constitution (which is in the Pennsylvania minutes of the Very Rev. Classis of Amsterdam, and which is in use there) in the month of July, 1734. The congregation has thus far been served by John Philip Boehm, whom they ac- cepted as their regular pastor. He holds services in this congregation every four weeks. On September 10th, 1738, the communicants present were 75. (5) Germantown. With this congregation I have had no personal relations, nor have I any exact knowledge about its condition because, although it was often proposed to them, they never would submit to any church order. Yet this much is known to me (because I asked two of the elders, ]\Iinch [Muench] and Benzel), that in the month of September, 1734, there had been about 30 communicants. Since then John Bechtel has preached for them and has undertaken to ad- * minister the Sacraments. Then they also allowed the old Guide [Guldin] to preach in their church, and now the Lu- therans also make use of it, and thus the Reformed people there are at present in a rather poor condition. (6) Conestoga. This place is very far away, a distance * The Dnteli Do. for Domine, minister, we retain to preserve the then current title. 8 COETUS OF FENNSYLVANIA. of more than seventy miles from Philadelphia. The Reformed people there have in fact organized themselves into three congregations, the first which was started I call the Hill church; it lies in the center. This I served (in agreement with their call to visit them twice a year) on October 15th, 1727. And, as it was the first time that a [Reformed] com- munion service was ever celebrated at Conestoga, there were present 59 communicants, but these visits were made only a few times. Then Do. Weiss slandered me in this congrega- tion by a very abusive letter (which I have in my possession). He thereby misled them and drew the congregation to him- self. But soon afterwards he again left them, whereupon Miller went there to carry on the work of Weiss. At that time Miller drew also Tulpehoeken to himself. I warned them frequently against this false spirit, but the misguided and simple-minded people clung to him, until finally the deception, with regard to which I had so faithfully warned them, came to light, and this IMiller publicly went over to the evil sect of the Seventh Day Baptists, and was baptized as a Dunker at Conestoga in the month of April, 1735. He took with him about 10 families, Lutheran and Reformed, from the congregation at Tulpehoeken, who followed his example. This caused a great alarm among the congregations. Those that were kept by God sent therefore again messengers and letters to me and once more asked for help, which I did not dare to refuse. I again went to them, and there were on May 11th, 1735, in said first congregation, or Hill church, at Con- estoga, 92 communicants. On the same journey I administered the Lord's Supper, at their own request, in the second congregation (the name of which place is Cocalico) , which had been gathered at a former time. There were present, as communicants, 60. But as to the third congregation in Conestoga, which has organized itself in the new town called Lancaster, I have no information, for up to this time they acted according to their own pleasure. They have never cared for church order, but thus far have allowed themselves to be served by irregular men. However, I hear that they have a pretty strong con- gregation. These three places lie in the Conestoga district, Lancaster BECOBDS OF I'/SJ. ,^ southward, six miles to the Hill church, then six miles north to Cocalico. (7) Tulpehockeu (18 miles from Conestoga, is served by Boehm). This place is about as far from Philadelphia as Conestoga (both situated towards the northwest). It is a pretty large place, and the congregation there had also con- templated a division. But it seemed to me that it would be better to have a meeting-place in the center, as it had been in the beginning. With this plan the majority agreed, even those who live at a great distance from the center. Then the minister could supply the neighboring places, where already many people live, and where still more are gathering, at the times appointed to serve them as it might be arranged later on. Some years ago it seemed that Conestoga and Tulpehocken could be served with difficulty, but if necessary by one minis- ter. But since then both have spread to such an extent that it is impossible for one minister to serve them as they should be served. For this Tulpehocken has much increased since Miller has become such a disgrace, and I travel thither, according to their request, twice a year and administer the Lord's Supper. On October 19th and 22d of last year [1738] there were pres- ent as communicants in the two places 134. N. B. When I administered the Lord's Supper there for the first time, in the month of October, 1727, at the same time as at Conestoga, there were only 32 communicants. In this congregation there are, in accordance with our Church-Order, four elders and two deacons. Two elders and one deacon reg-ularly go out of office every year and just as many come in, the same as in all the congregations which I serve. (8) Goshenhoppen. Of this congregation I know little, for it never wanted to be under our Church-Order, but desired to be its own master. When Do. Weiss, as stated above, came into the country and caused great confusion, they faithfully adhered to him. When he traveled to Holland in order to obtain the well known moneys collected there they immediately clung to Miller, who, assisted by another person, continued to serve Goshenhoppen. By their services at Skip- pack, they kept the congregation there in a state of continuous restlessness, which had been begun by Weiss. All my peti- 10 COBTUS OF PEyySYLTjyiA. tions, entreaties and warnings were in vain. After these men had failed, they arbitrarily made Henry Goetschi their pretended minister when he was hardly eighteen years of aire, and but half a year before had received the Lord's Supper for the first time from Do. Rieger at Germautowu. Goetsehi then soon undertook to administer the Lord "s Supper and to baptize, to install elders and to many people. In short, he did what belongs to the office of a regular minister. Goshenhoppen has him at the present time as its preacher. and permits him to establish and to carry on all this disorder from Goshenhoppen as a center, r.^^ :/y at Skippack. but at other places also. He has done :. >. :or instance, at Oley, where he has misled the congregation, which was established by me in 1736 at their request, and he now also serves this congregation. At Tnlpehocken he attempted to do the same thing throngh three uncalled for visits, but he was refused. Yet he continues such improi)er actions. Meanwhile this Goshenhoppen is a congregation or a place where a faithful shepherd and minister is greatly needed, through whose wise administration a flourishing congregation ought soon to be estsJslished. There are also several plac-es near Goshenhoppen which should be provided for. as Great Swamp and Saucon Creek. These, although they might be served by the minister of Goshenhoppen with the adminis- tration of the Sacraments and sometimes with a sermon, yet need to be provided with readers who have the ability to cate- chise, especially at Saucon Creek, because it is a somewhat out'^f-the-way-plaee and many Keformed people live there. (9) Oley. This place has been in such a condition &nee I am in this country (which is now about 18 years) that it is astonishing to hear about the many sects among them. The worst were thofse who called themselves the "New Bom.'' Without any hesitation they declared themselves to be equal to God and greater than our Saviour; they pretended to be free (from sin), and more such things which it would be too much to relate here in detaO. However, after (Jod had removed such shameless blasphemers of his name, the true Chiistians met and desired to estabhsh, by the help of God, a eongregatifm according to our true Reformed doctrine. They therefore applied to me for help and aaaastance (of EECOEDS OF 17 39. 11 which I have proof). Whereupon I went there and found M-ith heart-felt joy, after a careful investigation, a goodly number of ver>' eager souls firm in our Reformed doctrines. Then I began the Lord's work among them. I called the congregation together and made them acquainted, according to the best of my ability, %vith our Church-Order. The con- gregation then elected four elders and two deacons, whom I installed according to the Constitution and in accordance ^vith the desire of the congregation on November 17th, 1736. The congregation then desired me to %'isit them twice a year (during the week) to administer the Lord's Supper and baptize their children. TThen everything had been duly con- stituted, after a preparatory service, I administered the Lord 's Supper, and the communicants present numbered 40. But scarcely had this been done when Henry Goetschi came and acted as mentioned above, in the description of Goshen- hoppen. Some who had long been separated from the Re- formed church and had had intercourse Avith the above men- tioned sects, as the New Born, used Goetschi in order to cause confusion in the newly organized congregation. To make a beginning they offered that if the congregation would accept this Goetschi they would again come back to the Reformed church and be helpful in all things. This pleased Goetschi, who pretended to have lately been recognized and ordained as a regular minister in Philadelphia. He immediately preached in my place, and directly after the se^^'ice he bap- tized a child before the congregation. When later on I called the elders to account concerning this disorder they excused themselves by saying they had not asked him to do so ; they had thought that he was ordained, as he told them, and he also acted as if I were satisfied with the arrangement. But the consistory was thereby divided, because some of the elders and deacons had not at all consented to let him preach unless having p^e^^ously spoken to me about it, and since they now heard the contrary they were all at variance. But those who were led astray let everything pass, and Goetschi therefore continued, and has acted up to this time as if he were an ordained minister. At present I do not know how things are there, but this much I know, that a part of the elders and deacons whom I installed have until now withdrawn from 12 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA the work. Nor have I been there since, because there has been such a confusion through Goetschi that I could not bring forth any fruit. But said instigators have soon been lost to us, and have as yet aided very little tOAvards the building up of the congregation. From all this it may be seen how necessary it is that a very faithful pastor be appointed to this congregation, that he may seek the lost and bring back those who have gone into error, so that even there the body of Christ may grow through his grace. The minister of this congregation can also supply the place which is called Cacusi, where (as I hear) likewise a considerable congregation has gathered. This place is about seven or eight miles from the center in Oiey. (Goetschi has also presumed for some time to serve this congregation A^dth all the means of grace.) A minister might likewise at the same time serve I\Iaxatawny, -which is at a distance of ten miles. These are now the nine main congregations, mth their preaching places, consisting of High German Reformed peo- ple, in Pennsylvania, as far as they are loiown to me. together with the statement how far they are apart from each other and whatever other information was required. But vrhat- ever God will permit to grow in the future and what members he will gather when the number of inhabitants increases is only known to him. However, I think that six ministers would be sutiicient to serve these congregations. Now concerning the church buildings in all these congre- gations there have been erected the following (as far as I know) : Germantown. — A well built, pretty large stone church. Conestoga. — The Hill congregation has a small log church. The congregation at Lancaster has one of logs. The congregation at Cocalico also one of logs. Tidpehockcn. — There they have laid out, but not in the center, a cemetery, and have erected on it a small church building of logs, but not serviceable for public worship. Goshenhoppcn. — As I have heard from people that live there, they have built a pretty large church at that place, which will be sufficient for them for some time, but it is poorly made of wood. EECOEDS OF 1739. 13 Skippack. — A log church has also been built there, ten years ago when Do. Weiss caused trouble in this congre- gation. But Jacob Reiff caused the lot on which the church stands to be transferred to his name. At present he still refuses admission to the properly organized con- gregation, and one irregular minister after another has per- mitted himself to be used by Eeiff and his followers to keep up the trouble in the congregation. This is the place which Goetschi quite irregularly still serves, to the great hindrance of a union in the congregation. For this reason the regular congregation was obliged to buy a lot at Skippack, which is at a very convenient place. But I fear that on account of the poverty of the members, unless God sends some help by his grace, the lot will be lost again on account of the debt still resting upon it. This would be a great loss to the congre- gation, since it would be difficult to obtain another lot. At Falkner Swamp, Whitemarsh, Oley and Philadelphia, and also in their neighboring places, there is as yet nothing. Services are held -snth great inconvenience in houses and barns. Except at Cacusi, near Oley, where, as I hear, they have built a little log church for their use. Now eonceraing the last point, how the congregations are supplied vrith schoolmasters and precentors, there is, as far as I know, nobody with a fixed position. ]\Iy congregation at Falkner Swamp is well supplied. The name of the school- master is John Reifschneider. There is also a schoolmaster at Philadelphia ; his name is John Berger, who is known to Do. Dorsius. But no one can make a li\nng by it. The rea- son is that no school in the country can bring enough children together for one to make a living by it (except Philadelphia and Germantovi-n, where the people live near together). ]Moreover, the congregations have not the means and are not able at the time being to raise money enough to support any- body. There is as yet in the whole country no dwelling either for minister or for schoolmaster. Singing up to this time had to be conducted as best we could. This is what I have been able to report according to the above mentioned request of Do. Dorsius. Nor do I believe that I can be accused (if this report be investigated) of hav- ing done anything useless against my better knowledge. But 14 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. I have done all to the glory of God and the upbuilding of his true church in this country. I sign myself John Philip Boehm, High German Reformed Minister in Pennsylvania. January 14th, 1739. The above report, which was made according to the desire of his Reverence, Mr. P. H. Dorsius, minister at Neshaminy, by his Reverence, John Philip Boehm, our beloved teacher and faithful pastor, we, as the present members of the con- sistories, have heard read from beginning to end and have well understood. Now, as we think that everything in the same is thoroughly truthful, we can also officially attest (each consistory for its congregation) that everything which concerns the same and is stated above is according to the best of our knowledge in reality so, as we do hereby, Elders and deacons of the congregation at Philadelphia, attest, January 28th, 1739. Caspar Ulrich, Elder. Nicholas Ewig, Elder. Bernhard Sigmund, Elder. John Wendel Brechbiehl, Elder. Jacob Walter, Deacon. John Gerhard, Deacon. Elders and deacons of the congregation at Falkner SAvamp attest, February 4th, 1739 : Bastian Reifschneider, Elder. Jacob Krausen, Elder. John Tricktenhengst, Elder. John Duenckel, Elder. Andrew Wets, Deacon. John Dietrich Bucher, Deacon. Of the congregation at Oley attest, February 5th, 1739 : Sebastian Gbef, Elder. John Frederick Leibi, Deacon. Henry Werner, Deacon. RECORDS OF 17 39. jg Of the congregation at Skippack attest, February 11th 1739 : Jacob Arnet, Elder. Andrew Oberbeck, Elder. Ulrich Stephen, Elder. Adam Meyrer, Elder. John Wuehrmann, Deacon. Jacob Beyer, Deacon. Of the congregation at Whitemarsh attest, February 18th, 1739: William De Wees, Elder. Christopher Ottinger, Elder. Lewis Knaus, Deacon. Philip Scherrer, Deacon. Of the congregation at Tulpehocken attest, February 22d, 1739 : Jacob Itzberger, Elder. Barthel Schaefer, Elder. Andrew Aulenbacher, Elder. John Haak, Elder. Jacob Wilhelm, Deacon. John Knoll, Deacon. Provisional repartition of the churches of the High German Reformed people in Pennsylvania, and how these churches may be combined and in the most convenient and useful way be served by six ministers, according to the testimony of the elders and deacons of a majority of the places, as contained in the required and above-stated report : I. For one minister, Philadelphia and Germanto^vn; he might live most conveniently at [Philadelphia]. II. Falkner Swamp and Skippack, to which also White- marsh belongs. These are the three congregations of Boehm, for which he was ordained by the Very Rev. Classis of Am- sterdam through the Rev. ministers at New York on Novem- ber 23d, 1729. Whitemarsh, because it is only four miles, and partly only half that distance from Germantown, and sixteen miles from Skippack, may with greater convenience be joined to Germantown, whose people might there attend church ser\dces. Do. Boehm and the elders at Whitemarsh are will- 16 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. ing to consent to this (if such a union should please our reverend church fathers), and Do. Boehm desires to retain Falkner Swamp and Skippack as his remaining two congre- gations. The parsonage can most suitably be located at Skip- pack, if the church lot which "was bought there can be re- tained. Therefore he prays very earnestly for greatly needed help, so that it can be kept by the congregation. III. Conestoga, in which there are three places. The min- ister could live most conveniently near the Hill church, from which he would have to go six miles in opposite directions to the other two places. IV. Tulpehocken, where probably a place could be found in the center, which would be most convenient for all. The neighboring places here are Quittopehilla and Swatara, both, as I hear, seven or eight miles or more above. They are reported to be pretty strong congregations, but mostly of poor people, who cannot help themselves at all. V. Oley. There the same condition prevails, and perhaps a suitable place may still be found from which Cacusi and Maxatawny may be served. VI. Goshenhoppen. As in the last two congregations, a place might here also be found for a minister's chvelling, which M^ould not be too inconvenient in order to supply Great Swamp and Saucon Creek from it. REPORT OF REV. JOHN PH. BOEHM TO THE SYNODS. JULY 8, 1744. (Hague 74, i. 33.) A true account of the origin of the German Reformed con- gregations in Pennsylvania, with the required statistics of the communicants and their increase from time to time, to which has been added a further report of the condition of the congregations made by the undersigned, as follows : Formerly, when there were no Reformed services in this country, the Reformed people at Falkner Swamp, Skippack and Wliitemarsh came together, and when they took com- munion it was with the Presbyterians in Philadelphia, in the year 1725. But because this appeared to some as not in accord with our Reformed Church they stayed away and became much scattered, as wandering sheep having no shep- herd, which was very distressing to observe. Accordingly they resolved once more urgently to request me (J. P. Boehm), although for full five years I had declined to do so, that I would become their pastor. This was so touch- ingly represented to me by two of their number thereunto commissioned that our hearts melted together in tears, and in the name of all the people it was pressed upon my conscience whether I had the courage to answer for it at the last judg- ment if I should leave them thus without help and allow so many souls to remain scattered among all kinds of sects, of which this country is filled. I thought indeed that it would be better for me if I could escape this yoke and support my family with my work and agriculture, but I was convinced by my conscience that I could not do otherwise. I allowed myself therefore to be persuaded to this work. With humble- ness of heart I addressed myself to the Lord's work, and drew up with nij^ brethren, as well as we could, a Constitution of the church, so that all things might be done in good order. We divided the charge into the three congregations men- tioned above, and when the Constitution had been presented to and accepted by the whole people I was regularly elected 2 (17) 18 COEirS OF PENXSYLVAXIA. by each oue of the congregations, and a formal call was ex- tended to me by the elders. Whereupon I began the ministry of the Lord in his name. After I had preached a few times to my dear congregations, namely, Falkner Swamp (which place is at present called New Hanover township), Skippack and Whitemarsh, which had entrusted themselves to my min- istr^^, we celebrated the Lord's Supper, and there communed for the first time on October 15, 1725. at Falkner Swamp 40 membei-s : in November, at Skippack, 37 members ; on Decem- ber 23. at Whitemai'sh, 21 members. This was the first beginning. These, our services, were continued in the best order for two years in such a manner that my heart rejoiced. More- over, since that time again as many communicants arrived. At that time a congregation was also gathered in Conestoga, namely, the first (whicJi I used to call Hill church, the oldest of the three, which are now associated together) ; also one at Tulpehoeken (where now also two have come into existence, six miles apart) . These two congregations at Conestoga and Tulpehoeken likewise called me. They desired to be organ- ized, which desire I granted, and began the work and minis- try of the gospel among them in conformity to our Church- Order. Subsequently the Lord's Supper was celebrated among them, and there communed on October 14. 1727, at Con- estoga, 59 members; on October 18, 1727, at Tulpehoeken, 32 members. (At both places for the first time.) "Whereupon after that time Frederick Hillegas arrived in this country with a companion. He also had two brothers, called Peter and IVIichael, living at Philadelphia, but he himself lived at New Goshenhoppen. He brought with him the well known Mr. George ^lichael Weiss, a youthful preacher Twho afterwards sailed for HoUand with the likewise well known Jacob Reiff to coUect money, of which, however, they have up to this date not yet rendered an account nor handed it over), whom they sought to force in a violent manner and in a shameful way into all my congregations here. Thus with this Weiss they were a hindrance to me and antagonized me, inas- much as Weiss immediately began in a rude manner to belittle me vrith shameful letters, which I have now in my possession. He ran around everywhere, tried to push me violently out RECORDS OF 1744. 19 of my office and preached in all my congregations without first consulting me about it. His attacks became so rude that although very few adhered to him. and they only at the instiga- tion of Hilligas and Doctor Jacob Diemer, I began to fear that our work, which we had carried on thus far in the name of the Lord, might thereby indeed be ruined. Particularly did he throw into confusion the congregation at Skippack, to which the bold and impertinent Jacob Reiff, who had created a party of his own. contributed materially his share. However heartily and frequently I have admonished with regard to this the congregation at Skippack. which separated at that time, yet up to this day I have not been able to unite them a^ain, because a party has been formed there which has been kept continuously by one irregular minister after another in the fire of disorder. TVhen Weiss went to Holland Peter Miller preached there (who now for a long time has been a Seventh Day Baptist) ; after him came Bartholomew Rieger (whom I never considered, on account of certain evidence, to be different from or more sound in the Reformed doctrine than ]\Iiller). He preached there for some time. After that they accepted young Goetschi. who also follows at present the ^lora^dan teachers (although he was ordained for Long Island by Do. Dorsius. who pretended to be inspector over the German and Dutch churches in this country) . After that they were served for many years by John "William Straub. at one time schoolmaster in the Palatinate at Cronau (who was dismissed there for adulter%^). But this people, besides some others whom he had also lured away from the congre- gation at Skippack, have again deposed him because of his scandalous conduct (for in addition he is a great drunkard). But I still hope that when Reiff has once been taken to ac- count for the collected money he will have to give up the church which stands upon his property, wherein I have not yet been allowed to preach, being compelled to go with mj^ little flock of organized people from one place to another, and get along with houses and barns. If aid should then be given to us in our helpless condition everything would come right again, and it is possible that Skippack might then be- come a fine congregation. But toward this I can contribute nothing (if it remains as it is now^ . for I have no power here, and we are also without help from the secular authorities. 20 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. As regards the church at Philadelphia, j\Ir. Weiss also took that out of my hands on his arrival, aided by the above mentioned opponents; for I had then already preached there a few times at their desire. But when he returned from Holland, and had acted so unbecomingly about the collected money wdth Reiff, he suddenly departed before Reiff came back, which was a year later, and thus abandoned the con- gregation. A\Tiereupon they allowed themselves to be served by the aforesaid adventurers, and last of all by Bartholomew Rieger, from wffom they again withdrew when they saw how his affairs stood, but only when they were nearly ruined. After all these things they called me (the entire congrega- tion, man for man, signed the call; there were 42 signatures, dated April 24, 1734, of which I enclose a copy*) and asked me that I might come to their rescue. It seemed to me indeed a very difficult matter to bring such a disorganized congre- gation into order, but I ventured to do so after they had requested me two or three times, and I began the Lord's work there also, restoring them to such a good condition that up to this time I serve them, even as my first three congregations, once a month. Be it understood this refers only to the relig- ious services; for regarding the aforesaid collections I have no authority, but in this I did by their request what I could, which, however, until now has not had much result. To Tulpehocken, on account of the great distance, I go but twice a year ; during the remaining time the two congregations in that locality have religious services by means of sermons read to them. They remain in good order, and do not allow themselves to be in the least delighted ^vith the false apostles of the Moravians (although these, especially Jacob Lischy, have frequently sought until now in an artful manner to steal in among them) . What further concerns the growth and increase of the several churches, it may be stated that in each of them, as named herein, from their beginning to the present time, the Lord's Supper has been administered every half year, accord- ing to the Church-Order; but the congregations were much * This as well as the other enclosures mentioned in this report have not been printed. EECOBDS OF 1744. 21 disturbed up to the year 1734 by great disorders and con- tinued personal attacks (notwithstanding that I had received the sacred ordination to the Gospel ministry on November 23, 1729, from the Reformed ministers at New York^ there- unto authorized by the Very Rev. Classis of Amsterdam, as appears from enclosure No. 2*). But the statistics presented herewith will show what pro- gress the above mentioned congregations have made after the aforesaid year 1734 until to-day. Members in : 1734 1737 1740 1743 At Falkner Swamp, April 7 40 April 3 37 April 26 152 March 26, 131; April 24, 105 236 N. B. As the communicants largely increased the Lord's Supper was held there twice each time. At Skippack, April 14 53 April 9 55 April 6 39 April 3 (Easter) 36 At Wliitemarsh, April 21 24 April 16 15 AprU 13 59 March 13 51 At Philadelphia, September 15 88 March 1 91 April 20 (Easter) 130 March 20, 98 ; April 17, 85 183 At Tulpehocken, In May 103 In May 119 May 6, at one place, 124 | „_ May 8, at the other place, 129 j ' " ' ]\Iy further humble report, which I have to make to the Rev. Christian Synod concerning the present condition of * This document, Hague 74, I. 35, is identical with one found in a Kecord book of the Collegiate Reformed Church of New York and pub- lished in Mercersburg Review, 1876, pp. 549-553. 22 COETVS OF PENNSYLVANIA. each of these congregations in particular, with regard to different matters, is submitted in view of the duty and obliga- tion I owe to you, and their condition, as far as is known to me, is as follows : The congregation at Falkner Swamp has erected a well- built frame church, which may last a long time, but they still owe nearly sixty pounds on it. They have as yet no dwelling house for either pastor or reader. As regards the congregation at Skippack, there is a frame church there, but Reiff had the cunning to have it placed on his land, and thus he and his party have it under their con- trol and in their possession. On this account I and my little tiock, who hold loyally to the Church-Order, were compelled (because we had no fixed place where we could hold our ser- vices, and had to take refuge from place to place) to select a place for that purpose. We bought therefore a plantation of 150 acres for 220 pounds, but for lack of funds we sold 100 acres for 100 pounds and retained the 50 acres, upon which already before this a building stood, which is new, and was not erected for less than 100 pounds. It is suited in every way for a parsonage, and upon that piece of land a neat and suitable church and school house could be built, right along the street. Indeed, as regards the location, stand- ing in the midst, between the people's houses, it is more advan- tageous and better located than the one standing on Reiff 's land. This plan could be carried out for as little money as Reiff would charge us for land and church. To this place our good-hearted Reformed brethren in New York and on Long Island, on the urgent request of the Hon. Consistory there, have sent us 44 pounds. That amount and six pounds in addition were paid in, so that we are still 70 pounds behind in this. This place has now been rented with the condition that we always retain the liberty of holding our services there. And from the rent the interest is paid. But because we were so discouraged and saw no help, my brethren did not want to have anything more to do with it, but wished to sell the land again or load the whole burden upon my neck. In order not to let this place so lightly go out of our hands I pledged myself alone for it, and I have yet till next August 1st, more than a year's time, in which to pay. Should it now please HE COEDS OF 1744. 23 God to be gracious to us and to incline the hearts of our Church Fathers in their liberality toward us, for which Ave poor people have long waited, we will forever be- thankful to them for it. Finally, I have not had until now a penny's profit from this place, neither have I looked for it, but live all the time, up to this date, in my own house. But because of my inability I do not see how I can longer retain this prop- erty, unless some one comes to my aid. In the congregation at Whitemarsh we have as yet nothing at all (in the way of a church building), but during all this long time we have held our religious services always at the house of Elder Wm. De Wees without any unwillingness on his part or the least expectation of payment. That honest man cherishes a steadfast and pious hope that God will yet furnish means (to build a church). At Philadelphia we had thus far, in common with the Luth- erans, an old and dilapidated butcher's house, at an annual rent of three pounds; finally this was raised to four pounds, which we must now pay alone, for the Lutherans have built a church there of 70 by 45 feet. From this, people, who have experience in building conclude that it could not have been erected for less than 1500 pounds,* which by their own means they could do as little as the Reformed. Never- theless the walls and roof are actually finished, so that they must have received much assistance through collections ; from whence we do not know. Likewise they have a stone church in Providence township, of 50 by 38 feet, which is complete in all respects; they now have four ministers. Regarding the circumstances of one of them, Muhlenberg by name, 1 learn that his people give him what they can; he receives this on account, and the remainder he receives from London, whence he was sent hither. I have no acquaintance with the others, but it appears that they prosper. It also looks as if this church, in case we are left without aid, would be able to do us considerable injury, for some young men are known to me whom they have already won. I and the Reformed Church officers at Philadelphia ad- * This apparently high estimate is shown to be approximately correct by the Hallische Nachrichten, new edition, Vol. I., p. 151. 24 COEirS OF PEXXSYLVAyiA. dressed our Lord Proprietor over two years ago for a plot of ground. He consented, and finallr gave ns one, althougk inside the citv. one acre in extent, for 50 pounds sterling at a yeariy ground rent of six sMUings. from which he might hare realized as mueli as 200 pounds, upon which we now since that time bury our dead: before we had to bury our dead in a negro slave cemetery. But what does this benefit us ? The money for the land is now bearing interest, and the congre- gation can scarcely raise from the incoming alms the annual expenses of our meeting-house and this plot of ground. Regarding the congregations at Tulpehocken. the one some years ago bought 100 acres of land and built a small church upon it (but which now is altogether too small), and, as I recollect. I have heard from them that they have a debt of about 30 pounds on land and church. The other congrega- tion at Tulpehocken received as a gift a little piece of land consisting of four acres, and erected upon it a tolerably large, beautiful and well-built frame church. I heard when I was last with them, and for the first time held services in the church, and at the same time celebrated the Lord's Supper, that they owed as much as 60 pounds, although they did not yet have chairs or i)ews. Both these fine and very loyal con- gregations well deserve to be served and guided by a godly and faithful pastor. In the first congregation they have a faithful reader and schoolmaster, Francis Layenberger, who has been thus far a faithful watchman against the sects. I trust that, although his income is very meagre, he may yet be able to stay for a while. Li the second congregation one of the elders is reader, and thus they continue their religious services in the fear of God. living in good hope that God will graciously help them. Of Conestoga I cannot say much, since for a long time I have not conducted the services among them. For some time they accepted all they could get. and now they have nobody. There are at present three congregations. In the new city of Lancaster they had last ^Ir. John Barth. Rieger. but be- cause he always had very much intercourse with all sorts of people and all sorts of sects they took an aversion to him. Toward the end of last year Count Zinzendorf attended his church, of whom he made very much, and took him to his EECOEDS OF 17 U. o^ house. On the next Sunday his sermon (as I have heard in truth; was nothing but a glorifying and praising of the piety and the doctrines of the Moravian brethren. It also hap- pened that he (Eieger) and Zinzendorf were present at the house of a certain man, Jacob Baurle; there the Count said he must hasten to Philadelphia, for court was now in session there, and as surely as his name was Count Zinzendorf he would see to it that four men should hang, and nothing should save them but the King's mercy. (,This arose from the fact that Count Zinzendorf had made the Lutherans at Philadel- phia believe that he was a Lutheran minister, whereupon they took this Count for their preacher.) Afterwards he installed one of his creatures named Pyrlaeus; then they discovered his cunning tricks, and thrust the same, with the aid of the Beformed but I was not present), out of the meeting-house, which they had in comjnon. For these words * a lawyer of Philadelphia caused Jacob Bauerle to be summoned by the Court at Lancaster I have this from the lawyer *s own mouth) . And now when Eieger. who was present, was also made to give testimony, he excused himself by saying "he had not heard it."' 1 have had this only recently from the above-mentioned Jacob Bauerle "s own mouth) , which, added to other grievances, induc-ed this people to get rid of him. which they could readily do. as he was engaged by them on certain conditions. Thereupon Sieger went away from here, but his wife and children are still here. What has become of him I do not know, but it is said here that he has written to his brother from Leyden, in Holland. The surrounding congregations, around or near Conestoga, have long ago taken up with a man. Conrad Tempelman by name (he is from Heidelberg), a tailor by trade, and have made tiie same their minister. I know him. for he was school teacher and reader in the Bill church when I serxed them at the beginning. Of the same I noticed at that time nothing wrong in his life or conduct, and since have heard of him nothing but what was praiseworthy, especially that he is very watchful against the sects, and that his congregations are very much united. * Jaeob Baurle had evidently eireiilated this story abont Zimendoxf, and -when the latier heard of it he prose«ented Baurle for slander. 26 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Regarding the congregation at Goshenhoppen, it has alsa a suitable frame church upon a piece of land consisting of 50 acres, donated by some one, that all religions and sects should have the privilege of building a church thereon, and I lately learned from an old elder of theirs that the church is paid for. Two years ago four of them bought a plot. They intended to hand it over to the congregation for a par- sonage if they M^ere reimbursed for their outlay. How much it costs I do not know. This congregation up to this time has claimed the privilege accorded to them in the letter which Reiff had when he returned from his collecting tour, and purported to be written by his Reverence, Doctor Wilhelmi, of Rotterdam (whereof a copy may be found among the Penn- sylvania papers*). Hence they will not submit to any ordi- nances. And no matter how much I may admonish them, they remain of the same mind. They had taken young Goet- schi to be their pastor, but when Do. Dorsius arrived he with- drew from them, went to him, and studied a year with him, and after this year he was ordained as minister for Long Island in the month of April, 1741, by Mr. Dorsius, assisted by Do. Frelinghuysen, of Raritan, and still another (as I learned afterwards), Tennant by name, of whom it was said at that time that he was one of the Whitfielders. Meanwhile, since Goetschi was no longer with them, Do. Dorsius has sev- eral times administered the Lord's Supper to this people before his journey to Holland. As I learned on Tuesday after last Easter at Goshenhoppen from a ruling elder, it is arranged that he shall again administer it to them in next coming month of May. On this Tuesday after Easter, when I happened to come to Goshenhoppen, I found this among them: On Good Friday they had allowed the base deceiver, Jacob Lischy, to preach in their church, who at the same time baptized two children. When I represented to two elders who were together on this Tuesday after Easter the impro- priety of this act in the presence of several people, in having permitted a Moravian to do such things, they answered me that they themselves had held it up to him, but he had pro- tested with an oath and called upon God to forsake him if * It is preserved at Amsterdam, new letters No. 10. BE COEDS OF 1744. 27 he were a Moravian. He claimed to be a Reformed preacher from Switzerland. Then I showed them his Moravian hymn- book, entitled "Shepherd Songs of Bethlehem, for the use of all who are poor and humble," which before this was his own pocket hymn-book, and came to my hands in a wonderful but honorable way, in which he had written his name with his own hand ; when they compared the letter which he had writ- ten to them with it and saw that it was his own hand- writing, they realized his wicked conduct; the more so because when they told him that I had this little book, he had denied it was his, saying that he knew nothing of the book, that others could easily write his name in a book; he could not prevent that, and that for this reason he had long regarded me as a treach- erous Boehm, of whom he had before heard in Holland, etc. Then they acted as if they were very sorry. But one among them, Michael Raclner, confessed that it was his fault alone that Lisehy had come into the church. Whereupon I took my departure. The next day I spoke with another ruling elder, who Avas not present the day before. This one said to me with a sad heart, almost with tears: "But what shall we do?" Mr. Dorsius has told us we should not think that we could get ministers from Holland. We should ourselves see to it what Avas to be done. The Hollanders had said: "What do the Pennsylvanians imagine themselves to be? They live in a free country, have nothing to pay to any royal court, yet want to give but 10 pounds in such a large congregation to a minister; then we cannot provide them with ministers," etc. Nevertheless I admonished them to remain steadfast in prayer, and without being discouraged to wait upon God's favor. As for me, I felt assured that if our pious Church Fathers desired to admonish us or were displeased about anything, they would not thus rudely present it, but speak of it in amicable and friendly manner becoming to servants of God. But according to my expectations the affairs of our church would take quite a different turn under the provi- dence of God and his guidance, etc. And thus Ave separated. Lastly, the congregation at Germantown. This is in a sad state, as regards loyalty to our true Reformed doctrine. Yet many years ago they built a handsome stone church (on Avhich there is as yet quite a debt). But in spite of all our 28 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. admonitions, warnings and prayers tliey have constantly per- mitted every errorist to associate with them. For when Barth. Rieger, who, when he served Philadelphia also preached for them occasionally, had left them, they allowed John Bechtel to preach constantly to them, whom I had plainly enough described to them in my first and second letter of warning. Thus also old Samuel Guldi, who according to his own statement was minister in the three principal churches at Bern, in Switzerland (whence he was dismissed on account of his pietism and came to this country) , has often preached there. Meanwhile they also consented to have a sectarian crowd gather there every Sunday afternoon, of whom one had been before an Inspirationist, another a Pietist, Sepa- ratist, and whatever other kinds might be mentioned. These then assembled in the church, selected a passage of the Bible, and then disputed about it. But they allowed no one to compare Scripture with Scripture, but were of the opinion that every question could be decided by every one's convic- tion. The vulgar called these people Disputants, but they called themselves The Free Assembly. Nevertheless these antics soon amounted to nothing. After this they let Count Zinzendorf and his Moravians take possession of the church, who preached there awhile, and the turner John Bechtel was one of his worst proselyters. But since this Count Zinzendorf got into confusing quarrels and contentions with those Separatists, who came down on him too hard, he left this congregation of Germantown to his brother, John Bechtel, went away and returned to Philadel- phia. Then these thoughtless people permitted themselves to be led astray by this Bechtel through his hypocritical and smooth words, since he pretended that he would in the future firmly adhere to the Reformed doctrine, and he brought it by means of his sectarian creatures so far among them that, on his promise henceforth to adhere to the Reformed doctrine and always to teach the Heidelberg Catechism in its purity in all its points, they engaged him on January 27, 1743, for a year, as their pastor, giving him a testimonial thereof in writing. But hardly a week afterwards he wanted a paper signed by the four officers of the congregation, in which he excepted the eightieth and the one hundred and fourteenth RECORDS OF 1744. 29 questions. On being asked why, he replied: The eightieth question was unnecessary in this country and the one hundred and fourteenth (he said) was not true, because those who were converted no longer committed sin, and not only could keep the Commandments of God, but it was very easy for them to do so. Wliereupon the largest part of the congregation op- posed him all the more, but however they might try to induce liim (to leave) he had their paper, and they had to get along with him that j^ear. During that year he meanwhile established himself firmly vnth his Moravians in the church. They built a gallery in it, bought an organ for 60 pounds and put it on the gallery, intending by means of tiiese heavy expenses — since the Re- formed were so far back in their payments and unable to pay — in this way to get this church under the control of the Moravians. For this purpose they also offered to furnish the money. But when the year agreed upon was up, on January 27, 1744, they obtained control of the church and got rid of Bechtel, whom they dismissed. But the costs of the alterations and the organ had to be refunded. How they were able to do this I cannot imagine. ]\Ieanwhile if these people had a loyal disposition, upon which we could rely, and if that congregation would let itself be governed according to the Constitution, it would be of great importance to offer them assistance. But I have not yet been able to find the necessary requisites among them. For when they were now rid of Bechtel, on the next Sunday thereafter nearly all the Reformed people in the vicinity, from far and near, came together (most of the Whitemarsh people were also there) to consult in what manner the best and most suitable measures might be taken that this congre- gation might be brought into a good condition. At this time (according to the testimony of the elder from Whitemarsh, William De AVees) not a single member was present who did not vote for this, to call me also at Germantown as their reg- ular pastor, under the same conditions as is mentioned in the enclosed letter C, on page 6, regarding the little Whitemarsh congregation, that both of these congregations be brought under our Church-Order and be combined. But because one ought to deal very cautiously with such people, it happened 30 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. that on Februaiy 20th last, as in passing I conversed with one named Minck at his house in Germantown about these matters, I gave him this as my resolution: That I was very- glad that it had finally come so far, and that whenever they would come and place themselves under our ordinances and enter into our Christian communion, wherein already stood the Whitemarsh congregation, whose regular minister of God's Word I was, I should \^dth all my heart and gladly serve them, and, until God would be pleased to send from elsewhere other aid, would help them, to the best of my ability, in con- ducting their religious services. And if they would agree to this then I would expect from the congregation, or from their elders in their name, a written certificate thereof, men- tioning whatever they desired me to do. Whereupon I in return would likewise let them have my answer in my own writing. In ansAver to which this Minck replied, this shall be done. Which, however, they did not carry out. And it seems that the thought to be in subjection to church order, when every one is not permitted to act in everything arbi- trarily and according to his own pleasure, was not agreeable to some. These then, acting on their own authority, on March 11th, allowed a vagrant to preach in their church, a lock- smith by trade, living at Raritan, but who, as if he were a country apostle, travels everywhere through the land to preach; and thus they acted simply on their own authority, without their four chosen elders knoAving anything about it, much less appointing it or consenting to it, which I have learned from the mouth of some of these four men, and I also ascertained their displeasure at such proceedings. Wliicb act does not appear to be of a more encouraging nature than the previous acceptance of John Bechtel ; the more so as Bechtel when preaching towards the end of his year one Sun- day morning announced at the conclusion of the service that in the afternoon just this locksmith (who was present) would preach, which also took place. From which one can readily judge that this man and Bechtel are about of the same sort and played together under the same cover. Finally, before Easter, they also went and asked Do. Dorsius at Neshaminy to preach for them, and hence on Easter Sunday he preached at Germantown. BECORDS OF 1744. 01 Do. Dorsiiis has also promised the people at New Goshen- lioppen to administer the Lord 's Supper there on May 6, and that on the 7th he would be at Old Goshenhoppen, situated about four miles from Skippack, where the Lutheran and the Reformed people wish to build a union church (whereby again some members will be drawn away from Skippack, for until now this district had belonged to Skippack), and on May 7th he will there lay the corner-stone. On this occasion the Lutheran preacher, Andres by name, and Do. Dorsius are each to preach a sermon. Do. Dorsius asked said Lutheran pastor to announce this from his pulpit for the benefit of his Lutheran congregation, which he did on April 8th. After- wards I Avas told by some of my elders who were present that the Lutheran minister distinctly said: "Rev. Inspector Dor- sius will administer the Lord's Supper on May 6 at New Goshenhoppen for the Reformed people, and on the 7th ditto, at the laying of the corner-stone of the union church at Old Goshenhoppen, he, as well as myself (the Lutheran pastor), will preach the first sermon" (which words a certain man who had heard them told me with astonishment in my house on the 16th of April) . What all these things mean, — to foster the spirit of inde- pendence in congregations which with difficulty allow them- selves to be brought under church order; and to make no attempt to lead them to something more edifying and whole- some and what consequences this will cause in the future, — all this time alone will show. J. P. Boehm. April 20, 1744. P. S. On May 6, Do. Dorsius administered the Lord's Supper at New Goshenhoppen ; several persons from Falkner Swamp communed there without saying anything. On j\Iay 7, the corner-stone of the above-mentioned union church was to be laid; a considerable number of people were present, but the day was rainy. Do. Dorsius did not come. It was then postponed till Whit Monday, May 34, old style. Do. Dorsius again did not come. But an elder of New Goshenhoppen was appointed to represent Do. Dorsius, and thus the work was accomplished. Boehm. July 7, 1744. (On Sunday, July 8, Do. Dorsius was at Conestoga.) 32 COETVS OF PENNSYLVANIA. In the name of the Triune God, Amen. COETUS ACTS of the Reformed Ministerium of the congregations in Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, September, 29th, 1747. By Michael Schlatter, V. D. M., of St. Gall, Switzerland, now the regular minister of the Reformed Church which is being gathered for Christ in Philadelphia and German town, President pro tem. of the Coetus under the supervision of the Synods of South and North Holland. (Hague 74, I. 46.) BECOEDS OF 1747. 33 (Tuesday) Septemher 29. In the forenoon at 9 o 'clock all the members of the Honor- able and Reverend Coetus proceeded from the parsonage to the old church, Avhere the Rev. Brother Rieger preached on the 133d Psalm in a devout and edifying manner, and to the general satisfaction of his hearers. Afternoon at 2 o'clock, the first session. This session, like all the following, was opened with fervent prayer. In accordance \vith the desire of the Reverend Deputies of the Synods of South and North Holland, the writer of this, Michael Schlatter, presided. Thereupon the names of the members present at the meeting were recorded, and these were the following, namely : From Philadelphia and Germantown. — Michael Schlatter, V. D. M., and president pro tem., Daniel Bouton, John Gaul, Christopher Meng, Paul Geissel. Falkner Sivamp, Providence and Witpen Township.— John Philip Boehm, V. D. M., Frederick Reimer, Conrad Ribel and John Herpel, Michael Kleim. Old and Neiv Goshenhoppen, Great Sivamp. — Georg Mi- chael Weiss, V. D. M., Christian Schneider and Daniel Hister, John Huth and Philip Ried, John Huber and Nicholas Mont- bauer. Schaeffer's Church and Erlentoivn* Congregation in Con- estoga. — John Barth. Rieger, V. D. M., Michael Weidler, Philip Rank. Lancaster. — Vacant. Tidpehocken. — John Stein, Valentine Unruh. Skippack. — Jacob Arnet, Peter Speyker. Indinn Field. — Michael Berger, Frederick Zoellner. • Springfield. — Christian Schugg. Blue Mountains and Egypt. — Abraham Wotring, Peter Kocher. Little Lehigh. — Henry Roth. Saucon at Herzel's. — Anthony Lerch. York (Jorgtown) . — Caspar Spengler. It was further resolved that our General Coetus shall be * Erlentown stands for Earl township, in Lancaster county. 34 COST us OF PENNSYLVANIA. held annually on [St.] Michael's Day,* and shall be convened by the president then in office. (Wednesday) September 30. SECOND AND THIRD SESSIONS. My journal from June, 1746, to March 1, 1747, of which a full copy was sent to Holland to the Reverend Deputies of the Reverend and Christian Synods, and to the much Es- teemed Classis of Amsterdam, was read by me word for word. This journal, or record, was approved by the Coetus, its cor- rectness acknowledged, and the following letter authorized and ordered to be sent to Holland : (Thursday) September 31.** FOURTH SESSION. Upon the written summons of his Reverence, Domine Michael Schlatter, sent from Philadelphia to us, the under- signed Ministers and Elders of the High German Reformed Churches in Pennsylvania, that we appear in Philadelphia on the 29th of September, 1747, in order to attend the afore- said Coetus, we, the undersigned, have obediently appeared here. At this Coetus Do. Schlatter clearly and distinctly read his report to the Reverend and Christian Synods of South and North Holland, and to the Classis of Amsterdam, made under date September 22, 1746, December 15, and in the month of May, 1747, consisting of seven or eight sheets, commencing June 1, 1746, and ending with his greeting. We have understood it well, and in accordance with his Syn- odical instructions have read it in all the congregations, and having approved the same we do hereby attest and confirm its statements." Done in our Coetal Assembly, held for the first time, in Philadelphia under date. Further did Do. Schlatter make a detailed report to the Coetus of his journeys among the Reformed congregations in Pennsylvania this spring and summer, which we considered and discussed. Whereupon we requested Mr. Schlatter most amicably and fraternally to have the kindness to take also this * St. Michael 's Day is September 29th. ** September having only thirty days, this date ought to be October Ist. RECORDS OF 1747. 35 trouble upon himself, besides his manifold duties, namely, to make known to the Reverend Deputies of the Christian Synods and to the Reverend Classis the acts of this our Coetus now being held, which Do. Schlatter agreed to do, but added the request that from the entire Coetus certain men might be chosen and authorized who should examine the aforesaid report, which his Reverence should at his conve- nience afterwards write up in proper form, in order to ascer- tain whether or not Mr. Schlatter had expressed the sentiment of the Rev. Coetus, which proposition having been approved of by us we have chosen the following men, namely: Mr. Daniel Bouton, of Philadelphia; Paul Geissel, of German- town; Frederick Reimer, of Falkner Swamp; John Huth, of Goshenhoppen, who should comply with the request of Mr. Schlatter and sign this our Coetal report in the name of us all. Signed by the following persons: J. P. BoEHM, V. D. M.,* Philip Rank, G. M. Weiss, V. D. M., Peter Speyker, John Earth. Rieger, V. D. M., Michael Berge, Frederick Reimer, Caspar Spengler, John Daniel Bouton, John Stein, Paul Geissel, Henry Roth, John Huth, Georg Ruth, Christian Schneider, Anthony Lerch, John Huber, Abraham "Wotring, Michael Kleim, Peter Kocher. Michael Weydler, (Thursday) Octoher 1st** FIFTH session. I made a report of what I had done in behalf of the brethren of our faith in Pennsylvania since the month of March until the present time, as follows : Several letters were read from Fred. Casimir Miller, Mr. Petersen, schoolmaster at Indian Field, and Mr. Seyfert; also a few letters of a bet- ter kind addressed to me from different consistories, from Monocacy, Conewago, Lancaster, York, Donegal, Macungie, * Verbi Dei Minister, i. e., Minister of God 's Word. ** The original has September 31, but this is certainly a mistake. 36 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Lehigh, Raritan, Cocalico, Little Lehigh, Saiicon, Forks [of the Delaware], etc., all of which requested help of me and asked for the Lord's Supper. Likewise a letter was read and translated which was written to me by Do. Hoedemaker, pastor at the Hague, dated April 20, 1747, stating that the letters which I had sent to Holland by Philip Ullrich were lost, but the first sheet of the Journal was duly received in Holland, was considered satisfactory, and was taken up by the Reverend Synods and the Reverend Deputies, I have also a letter from Mr. Jacob Lischy, formerly a Herrnhuter or Mora- vian preacher, written to me in the month of August of this year. In this letter he requests to be received as a brother by the Rev. Coetus, that he might in the future labor among and with us as a true Reformed minister. On May 1st I made a journey over the Susquehanna River, preached in York, and administered the Lord's Supper to 151 persons, baptized 29 children; 112 men promised 28 pounds and 200 bushels of grain. In Conewago I administered the Lord's Supper to 80 per- sons, baptized 21 children, and 46 men promised 11 pounds and 60 bushels of grain. In Monocacy I administered the Lord's Supper to 86 per- sons, baptized 26 children, and 49 men promised 36 pounds money and 86 bushels of grain. In the congregation at Jeremiah Miller's, in Donegal, I preached, and there 17 men promised 8 pounds and 38 bushels of grain. The congregation at Bastian Reyer's. where I administered the Lord's Supper to 70 persons, promised 13 pounds and about 100 bushels of grain. Cocalico and Muddy Creek received me partly with cold- ness and partly with rudeness. Particularly in Muddy Creek did my instruction meet with little respect, because they were satisfied with Do. Tempelman, who still preaches to them. Regarding the said Mr. Tempelman, he appears to be an honest, well-meaning person, and to be much liked by these three above-mentioned and some other congregations, as Quit- topehilla, Swatara, Donegal, etc. Therefore it Avas resolved with regard to him that, since, in sincerity and to the best of his ability, he has tried to keep these congregations together, BECOBDS OF 1747. 37 without seeking or finding much advantage thereby, and did not set himself against our order, but was always ready to make way for an ordained minister, therefore his ease shall be reported to Holland, and inquiry be made whether, after White Oaks, Cocalico and Muddy Creek have received an ordained minister, he might not be ordained, and then Swa- tara, where he resides, Donegal and Quittopehilla be given to him. Oley, IManatawny, Maxatawny, Macungie, AUemaengel, Lehigh, etc., are not yet ripe enough. They should be let alone until their desire for true and regular ministers be- comes greater. In Saucon, Forks, Springfield, etc., the people are well satisfied with Mr. Conrad Wierts, of Zurich, some few ex- cepted. Poverty hurts the man much in his ministry, but because he means well and no one can speak evil of him, therefore the circumstances with regard to his person and said congregations shall be favorably reported to Holland. (Friday) October 2. SIXTH SESSION. Regarding Mr. Jacob Lischy, it was resolved that I and Do. Rieger should travel, before winter sets in, to York, on the Catores [Codorus], to examine the afi^airs and condition and the feeling of the congregation there towards Mr. Lischy, and then report everything, together with his above-mentioned request, to Holland, and obtain advice whether we can or ought to accept him if he should unreservedly submit to all regulations and allow himself to be ordained anew. It is also resolved that in the letter to Holland, Monocacy and Cono- cocheague, in Maryland, and Shenandoah, Southbranch, Po- tomac and Lyken Run [Licking Run], or Germantown [in Virginia], be most favorably mentioned, and to intercede for the same, that they may receive a minister for themselves, or at least some other help. In regard to the differences at Skippack, about the money collected in New York for the church at Skippack by Do. Boehm in the year 17 — , these have been settled in the follow- ing manner: 1. When the names and the offer of the Reformed people, who at present belong or desire to belong to the congregation 38 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. at Skippack, was brought in there were found 18 men who promised together 8 pounds 8 shillings for a pastor, who should also minister to them. 2. Do. Boehm, who served the church at Skippack for more than 20 years, has received little salary, and he says up to this time he has never been able to induce the congregation to make an effort to build a church with the money collected. 3. The congregation was almost entirely broken up, so that a year ago there were not five families Avho remained loyal to Do. Boehm. 4. Do. Boehm made the following proposition to the Coetus,* namely: Whether he might not properly apply and expend this money collected in New York, consisting of 44 pounds, for the church and congregation, which would be erected in "Wit- pen township. 5. The Coetus made no objection to Rev. Brother Boehm 's proposition, in case the congregation at Skippack would also agree to it. Whereupon the brethren from Skippack, as the repre- sentatives of the congregation, Messrs. Jac. Arent and Peter Speyker, agreed and settled with Do. Boehm before the whole Coetus, as follows: That Do. Boehm be permitted to use 40 pounds of the money collected in New York for the church in AVitpen township: the other 4 pounds, as well as the other collections raised in Philadelphia and in other places for Skippack, shall be deliv- ered by Do. Boehm to the people of Skippack. * The name ' ' Coetus ' ' is derived from the Latin co for cum together and the passive participle of ire to go, hence it means that which has come together or a convention. It was first applied by John a Lasco to a weekly conference of ministers, which he established in 1544 at Emden, Germany. See H. Dalton, Johannes a Lasco, Gotha 1881, pp. 252-258. The name came to Pennsylvania more directly from Holland. The Deputies of the Synods of North and South Holland called each of their monthly meetings a coetus. In this sense the word is used on the title page of the first Coetus-Minutes. Gradually it was transferred from the meeting to the organization itself. The name Coetus indi- cated, both in Holland and Pennsylvania, that the resolutions of the respective bodies were not final until approved by the Synods of Holland, MINUTES OF THE SECOND COETUS OF THE REFORMED CHURCHES IN PENNSYLVANIA, HELD ON THE 28th OF SEPTEMBER, 1748. (Hague 74, ii. 6, pp. 6-14.) Preparatory to the meeting of Coetus a sermon was preached, on Eph. vi. 23, 24 by Do. John Philip Leydieh, a Reformed minister and member of this Coetus. This service took place at 10 a. m. in the new church at Philadelphia. In the after- noon at 3 o'clock the Coetus was opened by invoking the fatherly blessing of God, the president being Mr. John Philip Boehm, who was the first High-German Reformed minister in Pennsylvania, ordained in 1728,* at present pastor in Falkner Swamp, Providence and Witpen. I. It was resolved to decide on what day of the year, in future, the annual meeting of Coetus should be held, which should then be announced to the whole body, so that hereafter every one might know what to do. After a deliberation con- cerning this article it w^as resolved that the Coetus should always be held on the last Tuesday in September, and that the next meeting in 1749 should be held at Lancaster, in Conestoga. This was then adopted by the Reverend Coetus, and w-as announced to the whole reverend body. It was also decided that the annual meeting shall be opened with a ser- mon on this said Tuesday, in the morning at 10 o 'clock. IL No one shall be allowed to occupy a seat in this Reverend Coetus but the orthodox and regular ministers, who are actu- ally serving the Reformed people in Pennsylvania, together with one of the elders of their congregations, who may accom- pany them. And in order to prevent all dispute and strife in this matter * This is a mistake ; it ought to be 1729. (39) 40 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. among the consistories and congregations of the whole coun- try it was required that each member of the consistory who appears shall lay before the Coetus a satisfactory certificate, signed by every other member of the consistory of his congre- gation. These certificates shall be preserved, together with the minutes of the Coetus, for all time, so that no one shall be able to complain with regard to what may be done by those who have been selected as delegates and what they, together with their ministers, may transact and resolve in the Rever- end Coetus. With respect to said certificates, there have been only a few brought in this year, a matter which was over- looked this time on account of the ignorance of some of the members. However, it was resolved to allow no one here- after to sit or vote in the Coetus, or to be heard, unless he has shown a proper certificate from the consistory to which he belongs. III. The president stated that a paper should be drawn up with regard to the following instruction given to the Do. ]\Iichael Schlatter by the Venerable Christian Synods of South and North Holland: "That the members of the said Reverend "Coetus should sign the Heidelberg Catechism and the Canons of the National Synod of Dort of 1618 and 1619, declaring that they with heart and soul are devoted to the same and will hold to them unalterably." The Reverend Coetus con- sidered it right and necessary to do this, and thereupon the following was submitted: "We, the undersigned ministers in actual service in the Reformed congregations in Pennsylvania, having appeared at the appointed Coetus in Philadelphia on September 28th, 1748, together with the accompanying elders from our congregations, do hereby affirm that we are devoted heart and soul to the Heidelberg Catechism and the Canons of the National Synod of Dort of 1618 and 1619, and that we shall unalterably hold to them, as we do hereby : ' ' [Elders:] [Ministees:] Frederick Reimer of Falkner John Philip Boehm, minister Swamp. at Falkner Swamp, Provi- JoHN Herpel of Providence. dence and Witpen, Pres. , Michael Cleim of Witpen. p. t. BECOBDS OF 1748. 41 John Leim [Lein] of the first Michael Schlatter, V. D. M., congregation in Conestoga, Reformed Minister at Phila- organized May 31, 1730, delphia and Germantown. where Do. Rieger preaches. John Philip Leydich, Re- Daniel Bouton, of Philadel- formed minister in Pennsyl- phia. vania. John Heberling, of Tulpe- Dominicus Bartholomaeus, hock en. V. D. M. Nicholas Trewer, of Lancas- John Jacob Hochreutner, ter, the new city in Cone- V. D. M. stoga. Now because Do. John Bartholomew Rieger refused to do this he was requested to give his reasons in writing. He then (as secretary) himself wrote down the following: "With regard to the desire of a Christian Synod, namely, the signing of a paper by all the members of the Coetus, that they believe with all their heart and soilI what is contained in the Heidelberg Catechism and the Acts of the Synod of Dort, Anno 1618 and 1619, and hold to them unchangeably, the said Do. Rieger has heartily and sincerely declared that he felt some scruples concerning the article of the Synod of Dort treating of predestination in the sense of Calvin, and therefore submits this as a 'casum conscientiae ' to the judg- ment of Synod. ' ' Next in order was the consideration and deliberation by the whole Coetus of the general welfare of the Reformed churches in Pennsylvania. In order to serve this end it was suggested that the Constitution be read, if the Reverend Coe- tus so desires, which Constitution was drawn up at the very beginning of our Reformed worship, in the year 1725, by Do. John Philip Boehm, who was at that time elected by the Reformed members in Pennsylvania, and all the elders and members of the congregations. It was revised by the three reverend gentlemen, and at that time corresponding minis- ters, Gualther DuBois and Henry Boel, of New York, and Vincent Antonides, of Long Island, and then it was sent to the Reverend Classis of Amsterdam. The latter approved and permitted its use, and in the year 1728 it was adopted, and has remained in use among the first High German Re- formed congregations and several others. 42 COETVS OF PENNSYLVANIA. The reading of this Constitution was unanimously demanded by the Coetus, and it was read. But in order not to detain at the Reverend Coetus the delegates of those congregations in which there are as yet no ministers, but who nevertheless were sent to the Coetus, and who have come a great distance to submit their affairs, therefore the deliberation of the above- mentioned Constitution, after having been read distinctly^ was postponed till toward the close of the sessions. IV. The delegates from Egypt and Heidelberg, in Bucks county, and from Little Lehigh, have asked for a regular minister, and have received as a unanimous answer from the Coetus that if at least 50 pounds of Pennsylvania money can be raised, then Coetus will send a request to the Venerable Christian Synods to obtain a minister for them. Further, the delegates of the contending party, unfavorable to Mr. Lischy, offered their objections to Mr. Lischy in writing. Whereupon the unanimous resolution of Coetus was that Mr. Lischy should bring his confession of faith in writing, and that it should be sent by the Coetus to the Christian Synods and Reverend Classis of Amsterdam for decision, and that until then the case of said Mr. Lischy shall be postponed. But in the meantime, through a sort of compromise for the sake of peace, Mr. Lischy, as an otherwise industrious minister, shall be allowed to work among the scattered multitude of people. V. The question came up whether any Reformed minister belonging to this Coetus should in future be allowed to admit from another district (where there is a regular minister be- longing to this Coetus) any one to the Lord's Supper, to bap- tize children and officiate at marriages whenever and wherever he will, or whether every one should remain in his district and only officiate among members that are enrolled in his congre- gation or congregations, and belong to his district. Regard- ing this fifth point it was resolved by the Reverend Coetus that no minister of this Coetus shall admit any member of the Reformed congregations, whether husband, wife or single person, to the Holy Communion who formerly went to Com- RECOBDS OF 1748. 43 munion to another minister belonging to this Coetus, without the former minister's knowledge, and unless a certificate be shown. The same regulation shall hold for Holy Baptism as for the Holy Supper. Cases of necessity, in which one brother feels in duty bound to help the other, are excepted. The minister who is so requested shall take no fee for his labor, but shall perform it as for his brother, and therefore he shall give a baptismal certificate to those caring for the baptized child, and shall enjoin upon them to give this certifi- cate to their regular minister, so that such a child may be reg- istered in the regular book of baptism, in which the entry belongs, for which registration those who care for the child shall pay the usual fee to their regular minister. And with regard to the proclamation and the officiating at marriages, no minister shall take away anything from his brother's per- quisites, but shall refer the parties to the place where they belong. And if it be done for one or more important reasons (ex- cept hatred in any form, concerning which the minister ought always to ask) , then it may be done on this condition, that the officiating minister shall accept the fee and send it unasked to the minister of the congregation or district to which the parties belong. And if any minister shall act contrary to this he shall answer in the next Coetus to any complaint against him, and shall defend himself and accept the decision of Coetus as final. This, however, does not refer to people who do not belong to any of our congregations, or who bring a license. They are at liberty to select their minister. But if contrary to our expectation one or the other party belonging to one of our regular congregations, out of enmity should have a ceremony, as mentioned above, performed by others or by irregular persons, then they shall not be con- sidered as members of the congregation under which they stand until they shall have given ample satisfaction to the officiating consistory of their congregation. VI. The Reverend Coetus then considered and declared what was to be paid as a marriage fee by members of the congre- 44 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. gations, and for the registration of a baptized child in the baptismal record, and also for a funeral sermon. It was re- solved by the Reverend Coetus to ask as a marriage fee 7 shillings and 6 pence, and for a funeral sermon 5 shillings. But Holy Baptism shall be without any remuneration. VII. Question: Whether a man belonging to a Coetus congre- gation may be considered a member of the congregation and entitled to its privileges if he does not promise to contribute annually, acceording to his means, to the maintenance of the holy ministerial office, and does not actually contribute? It was answered in the negative. VIII. Another question: Whether the minutes of the Reverend Coetus should not remain in the hands of the president of each year, because he and the secretary are in duty bound to take the greatest care to send faithfully, and without delay and carelessness, the transactions of the Reverend Coetus and what- ever else may be found necessary during the year to the Rev- erend Deputies of Synod and Reverend Classis of Amsterdam, in Holland, so that they may be informed of the transactions of the Reverend Coetus and see what may be done by them for the welfare of our Reformed Church in Pennsylvania? If this question should be answered in the affirmative, then the presi- dent must pledge himself with his own signature at the close of Coetus to deliver up the minutes, together with the affixed credentials, Avhich are to be kept with the minutes, well pre- served and without additions, before the whole Coetus at its next annual meeting, to the minister who then shall be chosen president. The question was answered in the affirmative. IX. The ecclesiastical ordinances [Constitution] in all their points were once more carefully considered, in accordance with the resolution of Coetus (Article 3). The following motion was then passed : Since the Reverend Coetus acknowledges these ecclesiastical ordinances in all their parts as very carefully constructed, according to the necessities of this country, therefore Coetus EECOBDS OF 1748. 45 deems it advantageous to retain them as they have been used from the beginning in our Reformed churches here in Penn- sylvania to the present time, so that the Church in our whole country may be governed harmoniously and in brotherly love. However, if it should please the Reverend Christian Synods and Reverend Classis of Amsterdam, as our godly Church Fathers, to improve anything therein in order to further the future welfare of our Church, we are heartily willing as your children to accept the same with submissive an'd ecclesiastical respect, and to be satisfied with your favorable answer and confirmation of this matter, X. The Reverend Coetus may now select, according to its pleas- ure, the next presidents for the following two years, so that the retiring president can hand his pledges and signatures concerning the Coetus minutes, as is stated above in Article 8, to his successor before the whole Coetus, Whereupon there were elected for the year 1749 Do, Rieger, and for 1750 Do. Weis, The Reverend Coetus resolved that if the president of this year should take a journey or die, according to God's will,* the minutes of Coetus shall be entrusted to the minister who was the last president (if he signs the pledge), which papers the minister who holds the pledge of the deceased or absent president shall then take care of. Likewise if the same should happen to thp minister holding the pledge, his successor shall try to obtain the papers, XI, It was resolved to print and sell the Church-Order, which was read and approved of by Coetus. Do, Boehm will give his service to this work, offering to use the surplus money for church purposes, XII., and Finally. The Reverend Coetus requests Do. Michael Schlatter, as Commissioner of the Reverend Synods, to faithfully write * Kev. Mr. Boehm died, as he vaguely anticipated, within seven months after this meeting, while on a journey to Egypt, Lehigh county, on April 29, 1749. 46 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. down the nature and conditions, and likewise the needs of the congregations in Pennsylvania, and to report the same to the Reverend Christian Synods and Reverend Classis of Amster- dam. Therefore the following were authorized to certify his report in the name of the Reverend Coetus after we have left, namely : The president, Do. Boehm. The secretary. Do. Rieger. Thus transacted in our Coetal meeting at Philadelphia the 28th of September, 1748, and signed in the name of all by John Philip Boehm, Pres p. t. APPENDIX. It has been considered necessary and useful to add the following, namely : That every Eeformed minister belonging to the Reverend Coetus shall annually hand in to the Reverend Coetus, without fail, according to his duty, a report concerning the members of the congregations entrusted to him, how many have died, how many have been married, how many chil- dren of both sexes have been baptized, and how many new communicants have been admitted to the Holy Communion during the year, in addition to the former number, which shall be given. And, moreover, a regular formula of the certificate, mentioned in the second Article of the Minutes of Coetus, shall be brought in, without fail, by the elders who appear at the Coetus, namely, as follows : We, the undersigned elders and deacons, actually in service in the High-German Reformed congregation (or congregations) at N. N., have elected by majority of votes our brother, N., to appear at the Reverend Coetus of this year, , in our behalf. Whatever this our brother will present, and together with our regular pastor, Rev. Mr. (in case they have a regular pastor) will transact, resolve and subscribe (except what is contrary to our Reformed Church and doctrine), shall have full value and force among us, as if each one of us had been present himself, presented it, transacted, resolved and subscribed to it. In confirmation of all this, we set our own signatures hereunto, as we do herewith. Done in our assembly at N. on — , Anno . John Philip Boehm, President. Michael Schlatter, V. D. M. COETAL LETTER OF 1748. (Hague 74, i. 49.) Eeverend Christian Synods of South and North Holland and Reverend Classis of Amsterdam, Godly Fathers of the Church: To the Eeverend Christian Synods and Reverend Classis of Amsterdam, your most humble and obedient servant begs leave to send the second minutes of the Coetus of our Reformed churches in Pennsylvania, held on September 28th, 1748, in accordance with the unanimous resolution of the Coetus, in its eleventh Article, in printed form. The Reverend Christian Synods and Reverend Classis of Amsterdam, will thereby see, it is hoped, that we desired nothing else but to keep our still weak but true Church in this country in the pure doctrine, to govern it in peace and harmony, so that by its extension the name of God might be glorified and the kingdom of Jesus, our dearest and perfect Saviour, be enlarged. But as to Do. Rieger 's apology in Art. III., regarding that which I consider the chief and most necessary thing, in which special caution is required in this wretched country so full of sects, we submit the same to the godly and careful judgment of the Reverend Christian Synods and Reverend Classis of Amsterdam, awaiting your kind reply and in- struction. As regards the signing of the minutes of the Rev. Coetus by his Rev- erence as secretary, this was impossible, as his residence is so far away from mine; he resides at Conestoga. Moreover, I thought that, as he excused himself from acknowledging and subscribing to the above- mentioned main point, he would also hesitate to sign the entire minutes in which this point is incorporated, because he would thereby contradict himself, and hence it was omitted. In the meantime the Eeverend Christian Synods and Reverend Classis of Amsterdam may regard the minutes as entirely credible and suflficient, inasmuch as all the other Rev. brethren and ministers who were present signed it with their own hands, as did also the elders whom they had with them and who are named in the minutes, not one of them having raised the least objection. I am ready to send in, on demand, the orig- inal, which is kept here. Do. Schlatter has meanwhile gone to Lancaster, and preached there November 13th, and I for him in Philadelphia, where I stayed until the 16th, on account of the printing [of the minutes]. When Do. Schlatter came home on the 15th, he said he was commissioned ±0 sign Do. Eieger 's name as secretary, but it was too late, as the printer had completed his work. Eegarding Do. Weiss, neither he himself nor any of the elders of his (47) 48 COETUS OF PEXNSTLVANIA. three congregations, viz., Old and Xew Goshenhoppen and the Great Swamp, appeared. I do not know what was the reason. As to the case of Mr. Lisehv, mentioned in Art. IV., he has reserved to himself the right to send his confession of faith to Do. Schlatter. As for my part, I have good hope that he will be in the future a faithful laborer in our true church. May God, the only searcher of hearts, give him his blessing. The heart-rending and most deplorable case of Do. Hoehreutner, our dearly beloved and esteemed brother, I shall not touch upon here, because Do. Schlatter will describe it in detail, he being better able than I to describe it, having full knowledge of it. I content myself with saying that he lost his life by an unfortunate gun-shot in Do. Schlatter's house in Philadelphia. It was assuredly a hard blow for our Reformed Church in Pennsylvania, and a still greater trial for the old and the young mem- bers of the body of Jesus in our true church. The ways of God are wonderful and always holy. This is what I was ordered to send to the Reverend Synods and the Reverend Classis of Amsterdam. I have done it according to my duty and the best of my ability. Imploring our omnipotent, faithful God and heavenly Father upon my knees to preserve with his grace and blessing his true church in this dangerous land against all wicked and false laborers, to support it by his omnipotence, and graciously to keep it by his providence, which is inscrutable, that it may be increased to the honor of his name. Amen. To the same God who helps aU those who trust in him and to the word of his grace, your most obedient and humble servant in Jesus Christ commends the Rev. Christian Synods and the Reverend Classis of Am- sterdam, as our godly Church Fathers, your persons, families and holy service. With heart and soul I wish you blessing, life, and the eternal crown for your great toil and the Christian care and solicitude which you show for our still feeble and dependent but true Reformed Church and all its faithful servants. We commend ourselves, with our whole church and faithful feUow-servants (next to God, who is aU in all), to the Reverend Christian Synods and the Reverend Classis of Amster- dam for their continued fatherly and Christian affection, care and solicitude. Calling myself in all humility the most himible and obedient servant of the Reverend Christian Synods of South and North Holland and the Reverend Classis of Amsterdam, John Philip Boehm, The first burden-bearer in all Pennsylvania, now merely pastor of the newly- organized and still small congregation of Witpen, in Philadel- phia county. Pro tem Coetts Praeses. WiTPEX Township, ix Philadelphia County, November Slst, 1748. CONSTITUTION OF 1748. (Hague 74, ii. 6, pp. 1-5.*) The following are our church ordinances, heretofore dra^vn up, now improved, -with obedient submission to the Very Reverend Classis of Amsterdam, namely: 1. That the consistories which are now in service in the three congre- gations at Falkner Swamp, Skippack and Whitemarsh shall be recog- nized and remain in office for their appointed term, when all the mem- bers of the congregation (as has been done heretofore), together with the minister and consistories, shall elect new members of the consistory. But, at the same meeting, all members of the congregations shall transfer, each to his own consistory, all power and right hereafter from year to year to elect officers by a majority vote of the consistories them- selves, because with the growth and spread of the congregations it is not feasible to bring together all the members just for this purpose. The persons elected to the consistory shall be announced, each in his ovm congregation, three Sundays, to ascertain whether any one has any lawful objection to offer, and if not they shall, after the third announce- ment, be installed in office. And should it happen, which we do not expect of any one, that one or more of the members of the consistory should give offence by his conduct in any way whatsoever, or seek to create strife and division in the congregation, he shall be promptly admonished by the remaining members of the consistory to discontinue such conduct, and should any one not heed the admonition he shall then be removed from office and another member from among the number last in service shall be elected by the minister and remaining members of the consistory and be regu- larly installed ; then he shall serve as if he had been continuously in office. 2. Should one who has retired from the office of elder or deacon be free two years he may thereafter be re-elected, or even sooner, should this be considered necessary by the consistory then in office. 3. The elders, deacons and members of the three above-mentioned con- gregations have recognized Do. John Philip Boehm as their regiilar minister, and desire that with the grace of God he may yet long continue in faithful service, according to the doctrine of the Eeformed churches, as he has done hitherto. X. B. Here it is to be observed that instead of the name of John Philip Boehm, who was the first minister of these three Reformed con- * A MS. copy of this Constitution made by Boehm himself and dated March IS, 1744, is still in existence at The Hague, 74, I. 34. It agrees verbatim with the one here printed. (49) 50 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. gregations in Pennsylvania, the name of the minister actually in these congregations shall be clearly announced. 4. The minister, elders and deacons, and the entire congregation, shall observe, both on the Lord 's day and on other days, the time when and the place where divine service is appointed ; yet they may change the same at pleasure. 5. The Sacrament of Baptism shall at all times be administered without a fee after divine service. Besides the parents, witnesses shall be pres- ent at the baptism, and this well-established custom shall not be lightly changed. As witnesses at the baptism shall be chosen persons who have confessed the pure doctrine of the Gospel, and whose lives are blameless. 6. The Holy Supper shall be administered twice a year in every con- gregation in which divine worship is maintained. No one shall be ad- mitted thereto unless upon confession before the consistory and evidence of a godly life, or proper testimonials from another Eeformed congrega- tion, in accordance with the Church-Order of the Synod of Dort of 1618 and 1619. All the members shall always appeal' at the preparatory sermon, and after the service shall come forward. In case they become careless in this matter they shall be spoken to by the consistory as may be found necessary. The older members shall faithfully instruct the young in Reformed worship, and shall see to it that they give faithful attention to the hear- ing of the Word of God, both in preaching and in catechetical instruc- tion, so that the youth may also be admitted to the Holy Communion. All the members may commune in each of the three congregations, and to this there shall be no lawful objection so long as they have the same minister. 7. The bread and the wine for the Holy Communion shall always be bought and provided by the deacons out of the alms that have been collected, and afterward they shall give a faithful account of the same. 8. To meet this and other necessities of the church the alms shall always be gathered by the deacons while the congregation leaves the church, or otherwise, as the consistory may direct. 9. The members of the consistory, whether they be elders or deacons, to whom is entrusted the church treasury or other property, shall annu- ally render before the consistory an exact account of their stewardship. For this purpose they shall keep a faithful record of all receipts and expenditures, and when found correct the accounts shall be signed by the minister and an elder in behalf of all as approved. 10. Should a member of the congregation, male or female, fall into any sin, he shall be placed under the supervision of the consistory until he promise and give evidence of amendment of life. 11. It shall be the office and duty of the minister to preach the pure doctrine of the Reformed Church according to the Word of God, and to administer the holy seals of the Covenant at their appointed time and place; always to adhere to the confession of faith of the Reformed churches and to the Heidelberg Catechism; to explain the same regularly RECORDS OF 1748. 5]^ and consecutively; to hold catechetical instruction, etc. He shall give special attention to church discipline and correct practice, together with those who have the oversight of the congregation. He shall not omit to hold divine service at the appointed times and places without reasons of the greatest importance. He shall also pray in the public congregation for our beloved King, the King of Great Britain, and for the Government of this country. 12. At least once every half year the consistory shall hold a meeting, but the minister shall enter in a book all church matters. 13. Should it happen that he be inclined to remove, either being called elsewhere or for other weighty reasons, he shall give notice as soon as possible to the congregations, so that they may not be left embarrassed, but may in time secure another suitable man. And, further, in all other things the minister shall conduct himself as a faithful servant of Christ, the Great Shepherd of the sheep. The minister, together with the elders and deacons, shall exercise careful oversight over the congregation; they shall attend to the time and place appointed to hold consistory meetings, and shall not absent themselves without weighty reasons. They shall faithfully administer, according to their best ability, every- thing embraced in this discipline, each according to his office, and if any one knows of any scandal concerning another, be that one an officer or any other member, he shall feel conscientiously bound to make known the same, not from envy or hatred, but to prevent all offense. The accused party shall not be allowed to ask for the name of his accuser, nor shall he stubbornly deny the sin charged against him nor obstinately persist in the same. Those who thus act shall not be regarded as members of the congregation until they promise and show amendment of life. And in case any one has anything to say against the doctrine or the life of the minister, or of any other member of the consistory, or against any member, he shall abstain from all disgraceful and slanderous lan- guage, and shall not avenge himself, but shall make known the matter to the consistory and leave it in its hands. The same shall then be bound hereby to use all diligence to prevent scandal as much as possible. 15. The ruling elders and deacons of the congregation shall at all times faithfully see to it that in the most friendly way it be brought to the attention of every member of the congregation, and every one else who shows a disposition to manifest his love in this way, to make a free- will offering to the minister's salary, and such contributions shall be received by the consistory through a person appointed for the purpose at the time most convenient to make the paj-ment, and shall then be paid by this person at the appointed time to the minister on his fixed salary. 16. This Church-Order, which was sent by us with obedient submission to the Very Eeverend Classis of Amsterdam in the month of July, 1728, and which was approved by this very reverend assembly, is hereby en- larged and established. So also what was added by the very reverend 52 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. ministers, Dos. Gualther Du Bois and Henry Boel, of New York, and Vincent Antonides, of Long Island, appointed for this purpose by the Very Reverend Classis of Amsterdam, and concurred in by the three delegated elders of the three congregations at Falkner Swamp, Skippack and Whitemarsh under the date of November 18, 1729, shall be kept inviolate according to our best ability, in order that we may hold steadfastly to the Heidelberg Catechism, all the formulas of unity and the Synod of Dort. and neither we nor our descendants shall be per- mitted to add anything thereto, to take anything therefrom, or to act contrary thereto, nor to receive or to acknowledge any one as their reg- ular minister before such a one, as well as everything else, be submitted by the consistory of the congregations to the Very Reverend Classis of Amsterdam or to their delegates and approved by the same, and at al! times the answer received shall be final. The preceding Church-Order of our three congregations mentioned above shall be read publicly each year to the whole congregation at the time of the installation of new elders and deacons, and that they may adhere to it more firmly the new elders and deacons, before they are installed, shall each year subscribe to it in their own hand-writing, and shall then be properly installed in office in the presence of the congre- gation. As we hereby do. N. N. EXTRACTS REFERRING TO THE COETUS HELD IN PHILADELPHIA, OCTOBER 20-24, 1749.* FIRST EXTRACT FROM SCHLATTER'S '''WAHRHAFTE ERZEHLUNG," FRANKFURT, 1752, PP. 63 AND 64.** As our annual Coetus was to be held this year in Lancaster, T went thither on the 25th of the harvest month [September]. After the Eeverend Assembly had been oj^ened on the 27th with a well arranged and edifying sermon by Do. Leydich, the Reverend Brotherhood learned with much joy that Mr. Steiner, sent hither by the Eeverend Deputies of the Synod as minister, had arrived in good health, on the 25th, in Philadelphia. We resolved, for this reason, for the present to discontinue our deliberations, because we did not know what kind of orders his Reverence had brought from Holland. "We, however, ap- pointed our next meeting to be held on the 20th of the wine month [October] in my house in Philadelphia. On the 20th of the wine month [October] Do. Rieger opened our assembly, again convened, with an excellent, instructive sermon. Do. Bartholomaeus sent word by the elders of his congregation, that, on account of indisposition, he could not be present, and asked therefore to be excused by this assembly. Also Do. Steiner, at this time, was confined to bed by sickness, but through an elder of my congre- gation here, transmitted his papers and testimonials. This Synod con- sisted of five ministers, besides the two Dutch students mentioned above, and sixteen elders, all of whom were provided with proper credentials or testimonials. This meeting ended on the 24th with hearty thanksgiving to God for the brotherly love and unity of senti- ment which had prevailed in it, and each one returned well pleased to his field of labor. That which was brought before this Synod and was acted upon may be more fully seen in the minutes. * The minutes of 1749, 1750 and 1751 are lost. In their place some extracts are offered, taken from various sources. * * Compare also the edition of the Rev. Dr. H. Harbaugh, Phila- delphia, 1857, pp. 191, f. . (53) (SECOND EXTRACT.) RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DO. SCHLATTER TO WRITE AND SEND THE MINUTES. (Hague 74, i. 54.) Reverend, Well Learned, Godly and Much Esteemed Sirs, Deputies of the Reverend and Christian Synods of South and North Holland: We hereAvith request the Reverend Sir and Beloved Fellow- brother, Domine Schlatter, pastor in Philadelphia and Ger- mantown, that his Reverence may be pleased to have the kind- ness also to take this trouble, besides his other duties, to record faithfully the Minutes of our Rev. Coetus, together with all that concerns the congregations of our brethren in the faith, including their condition and whatever may serve for their upbuilding, improvement and welfare. He is to transmit the same to the Reverend Deputies of the Christian Synods for their Christian deliberation, after the signature of our president, Do. Rieger, or of his Reverence Do. J. Con- rad Steiner has been duly affixed. Done in our Coetal Assembly, October 23, 1749, and at- tested by our own signatures. John Bartholomew Rieger, Pres. pro tern. George Michael AA^eiss, Sec. p. t. John Philip Letdich, V. D. M. (54) (THIRD EXTRACT.) DECISION OF THE COETUS, IN FAVOR OF DO. M. SCHLATTER, AGAINST THE OLD CONSISTORY IN PHILADELPHIA. (Hague 74, ii. 10.) The resolution of the Rev. Coetus concerning the articles of complaint against Do. Schlatter, which articles the elders, against their promise, took away, so that Do. Schlatter neither through verbal nor written representations could obtain possession of them before the 20th of Februray, 1749-50. Philadelphia, October 22, 1749. Resolved, That the following resolution, unanimously and deliberately taken by the Reverend Coetus, concerning the quarrels and dissensions existing between Do. Schlatter on the one hand and the elders of this congregation on the other hand, shall be read to the Christian congregation [in Phila- delphia]. It reads verbatim as follows: The aforesaid Coetus having been legally constituted by the Rev. Synods of South and North Holland, and by the Rev. Classis of Amsterdam, the congregations in these regions must submit to the same with dutiful reverence. In the presence of God and in the fear of the Lord we have carefully looked into and Aveighed every misunderstanding, and particularly every complaint laid by the elders to the charge of Do. Schlatter, who, for the sake of peace and love, has come to the conclusion to leave everything, without any exception or reserve, to the decision of the Rev. Coetus, and to be satisfied therewith. Now it appears that these complaints and charges m their nature include nothing that is material, much less anything that could show the aforesaid Domine * Schlatter unworthy to continue in his office, or compel us to depose him therefrom; on the contrary, since the Rev. Coetus * Domine is the usual Dutch term for ministers. We use the ab- breviation Do. for the singular and Dos. for the plural. (55) 56 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. finds that these complaints are mixed with much secret bitterness, spite and envy, they indeed deserve special censure. But in order that the Rev. Coetus may indi- cate how much they have at heart the great law of love proclaimed by our common and glorified Master, Jesus Christ, it is the desire of the Rev. Coetus that all the differences and their consequences, both on the part of Do. Schlatter and on the part of the worthy elders, may be laid aside and buried in eternal oblivion. And that as a result Do. Schlatter be again accepted with affection, as before, so that the evil results which might proceed from a contrary course of action, not only in this but in all the other congre- gations of this our land, mav be avoided, the glory of God and of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ may be preserved, and the salvation of immortal souls may be promoted. But if, on the contrary, this our fraternal counsel, well considered and taken in the fear of the Lord, should not be approved or accepted by the elders, then the Rev. Coetus, according to the rule of God's Word, and the principles of our Reformed religion conforming to God's "Word, cannot recognize them as true and sincere members of the church. And we will be compelled to regard them, in accordance with the command of the Lord Jesus, as disturbers of the peace of God, who are threatened with the wrath and rejec- tion of God, which wdll rest upon them by reason of the evil that they bring upon themselves, their own souls and the souls of others, until they sincerely recognize and acknowl- edge their wrong, and repent and pray God for grace and par- don, who has promised in his Word that all that the church shall bind in the name of Jesus upon earth shall be bound in heaven, and what on earth she shall loose shall be loosed in heaven. May the Great Shepherd of the sheep, Jesus Christ, grant that this church and other churches may not be divided and ruined by offences that may arise, and may he so join the hearts of the pastors to the hearers and those of the hearers to their pastors, that all schism and offences may be pre- vented, peace and unity be preserved, and the kingdom of Christ thereby be promoted and increased. To which the entire Coetus, in the name of the Triune EECOBDS OF 1749. 57 God, saith Amen, and in confirmation of the same subscribe their signatures. John Bartholomew Eieger, Pres. pro tern. George Michael Weiss, Sec. p. t. John Philip Leydich, V. D. M. John Conrad Steiner, V. D. M. Philadelphia, October 21, 1749. Publicly read in the church in the presence of a large congregation. (FOURTH EXTRACT.) RESOLUTION WITH REGARD TO REV. MR. STEINER AND THE LANCASTER CONGREGATION. (Hague 74, i. 51 (22), also Harbaugh MSS., No. 13.) 4. The congregation of Lancaster made known its request and petition to the Coetus, intimating its desire to have our esteemed fellow-brother, Conrad Steiner, for its regular minister. After mature deliberation it was deemed necessary, since his Reverence, Mr. Conrad Steiner, was very sick and unable to attend the Coetus, to delegate two of our brethren to ask him for his opinion in this case, and whether he had sufficient confidence in the Coetus to be satisfied with what Coetus might decide in regard to his welfare. In order to accomplish this, Do. Weiss and Do. Ph. Leydich went immediately to him in the afternoon and acquainted him vdX\\ the sentiment of the Rev. Coetus. His Reverence was heartily pleased with it, and in a Christian and brotherly way aifirmed and immediately expressed his willingness to be satisfied with and to approve of everything which the Rev. Coetus might resolve with regard to him. Whereupon, after mature deliberation and for good rea- sons, it was resolved that it would be much more convenient and useful for his Reverence and his family if he were to serve, together with Lancaster, the vacant and forsaken con- gregations in Muddy Creek, Earltown and Weisseichenland (White Oaks), and this all the more since Lancaster could be served from time to time by Do. Rieger, p. t. president of the Coetus, who lives at Lancaster. The latter has made the cordial offer to the congregation that if they could and 58 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. would forget and forgive the old things Avhieh have happened here and there, he would be willing and inclined to work among them with the talents entrusted to him by God. and this all the more since he considered himself in duty bound before God to serve our Church with all his powers, so that on the judgment day he might appear before his Lord and Master Jesus Christ not empty and bare, but full of joy. Since Do. Steiner has made known that for some reasons he would rather live in the country than in the city, the Rev. Coetus has resolved, because there is a comfortable parsonage at ]\Iuddy Creek, which is eighteen English miles from Lan- caster, and the aforesaid congregations are not far from it, to assign this as his dwelling house, so that he may preach one Sunday at IMuddy Creek, the next at Earltown, the third at AVhite Oaks, and the fourth at Lancaster. The worthy elders of the congregation in Lancaster, Paul Weitzel and Caspar Schaffnor, did not accept the above resolution of the Rev. Coetus, but most strenuously protested against it, maintaining that they once for all would adhere, according to the wish of the whole congregation, to the call given to Do. Steiner by Do. Schlatter, and to the lengthy letter sent to them by the aforesaid Do. Schlatter. By order of the Rev. Coetus and in its name this is hereby attested and aifirmed in behalf of said deputies (elders). George Michael Weiss, Sec. p. t. Philadelphia, October 23, 1749. (FIFTH EXTRACT.) RESOLUTION OF COETUS WITH REGARD TO THE REIFF ACCOUNTS, EXONERATING REV. MR. SCHLATTER. (Saur-s Paper, Nov. 16, 1749, also Dec. 1, 1749.) ' ' Since, for some time past, I have been very much annoyed by painful and unproven charges in regard to the money which, some eighteen years ago, was sent, through ]\Ir. Jacob Reiif, by the Synods of South and North Holland, for the benefit of the Reformed people in Pennsylvania, I have thought it necessary, in order to establish my innocence and contradict such slanders, to publish the present extract in BECOBDS OF 1749. 59 the public papers. It is an extract taken from a testimonial which my reverend and beloved brethren in the ministry gave me at their last meeting after they had investigated this matter, and it runs as follows : "After previous careful examination of the matter, and agreeably to the witness of our conscience, we give to our brother. Do, Schlatter, this testimonial, that publicly and to all men may be kno^\Ti as follows : "Mr. Schlatter, pastor in Philadelphia and Germantown, in the matter of the money collected in Holland by Jacob Reiff, by receiving 100 Spanish pistoles.* has done nothing else than his duty, and has acted in accordance with the express instructions sent over to him during the past year by letter from the Reverend Synod of South Holland in regard to this money, which instructions he has conscien- tiously and faithfully followed, even though, previous to the reception of these orders from Holland, out of love to his congregation, Mr. Schlatter had already given to the respected elders of his congregation nearly one-half of it, Avhich action, however, he hopes to vindicate before the proper authorities. This we have seen clearly and distinctly from the account willingly submitted to us. In testimony whereof this has been signed and confirmed by the signature of our own names. "John Barth. Rieger, Pres. p. t. ' ' George Michael Weiss, Sec. p. t. "John Philip Letdich, in Falkner Swamp. "Michael Schlatter, Pastor in Philadelphia." Philadelphia, October 24th. 1749.** * A Spanish pistole is according to the Standard Dictionary $3.92. ** The following references to the Minutes of 1749 are found in Eupp's History of Berks and Lebanon Counties. Are these minutes still in existence? P. 444. "Messrs. Conrad Tempelman, at Swatara, and J. G. Wirtz, of Sacony, were on probation, as appears from the minutes of the Coetus held at Lancaster, October 20th, 1749. P. 448. It appears that besides at the Tulpehocken church there was none ministering in spiritual things within the present limits of Lebanon county prior to 1748 except Mr. Conrad Tempelman, who it seems from the minutes held at Lancaster, October, 1749, had, though he was not regularly ordained, preached at Swatara. " EXTRACTS FROM SCHLATTER'S "WAHRHAFTE ERZEHLUNG," FRANKFURT, 1752, REFERRING TO THE COETUS MEETINGS OF 1750. p. 66. On the 16th [of November] our Christian Synod was opened [in Philadelphia] in the usual way. I am prepared to make a state- ment to the Christian Synods, as far as it is necessary, of what was transacted in this assembly. On the 13th of the Christmas month [December] a special Synod was held in Philadelphia, in which it was unanimously resolved, that inasmuch as many of our letters which we had sent over had been lost, and we were being embarrassed more and more, I should be sent over to lay before the Christian Synods oral and written reports con- cerning the condition of the Pennsylvania churches, and humbly and impressively implore effectual help and support. Three of our min- isterial brethren engaged each to take his turn in attending to my duties in Philadelphia, during my absence, to the best of their ability, without respect to the trouble of travelling so great a distance.* LETTER OF COETUS TO THE CONGREGATION IN LANCASTER, DECEMBER 13, 1750. (Harbaugh MSS., No. 16.) To THE Christian and Reformed Congregation and their Worthy Deacons and Elders in Lancaster: Much Esteemed Members and Elders of the Honorable Congregation in Lancaster: The sad circumstances of the congregations in Philadelphia and in other places in Pennsylvania have compelled us, as ministers being sub- ordinate to church order and determined to uphold the same, to hold again a meeting or Coetal assembly in Philadelphia at the time specified below. This meeting was held for the purpose of finding ways and means how this confusion could be checked. We discovered no more useful means than to commission his Eeverence, Do. Schlatter, to travel to Hol- land as soon as possible in order to make the necessary representations to the Eev. Synods, as our dear Church Fathers, and to find out whether we can obtain help and counsel from them with regard to the confused condition in this country. We doubt not that with God's assistance we shall secure this help. We, the assembled ministers, make known to the worthy consistory and members of your congregation this resolution of our Coetus to the * See also the edition of the Eev. Dr. Henry Harbaugh, in his Life of Eev. M. Schlatter, Philadelphia, 1857, p. 195 f. (60) BECOEDS OF 1750. 61 end that, if you wish to share in the benefits of this journey, you will obligate yourselves to dismiss your present pastor, Mr. Fock,* as soon as the term of his engagement, being one year, comes to an end, he having been admitted to the service of the ministry only for the time being, and being everywhere in evil repute because of his conduct. As a proof that you accept this our salutary demand, you will immediately send a call to his Eeverence, Do. Schlatter, that you may be taken care of. Meanwhile the brethren, Dos. Leydich, Weiss and Lischy, have been commissioned by our Coetal assembly, after the dismissal of Mr. Fock, to conduct church services among you whenever they can find an oppor- tunity of getting away from their congregations. It will be your duty to send them the necessary invitations in advance. We trust that you will willingly accept this our request. Imploring all true peace and blessing upon you we remain, honored congregation and consistory, your devoted brethren in Christ, John Philip Leydich, V. D. M., See. Michael Schlatter, V. D. M., Philadelphia. Jacob Lischy, Reformed Pastor across the Susquehanna. Done in our Coetal assembly, Philadelphia, December 13, 1750. * The spelling of this name varies. He himself writes A''ock in a postscript to a letter of Schlatter, addressed to the Lancaster congrega- tion, dated January 18, 1750, see Harbaugh MSS. No. 14. EXTRACTS REFERRING TO THE COETUS HELD ON SEPTEMBER 12, 1751. (Acts of Syn. Deputies, Vol, X., p. 592.) Art. III. There was handed to the Deputies by Do. Kulenkamp a High German letter, written by Do. Leidig and Lischy, dated September 26, 1751, in answer to the letter of the Eev. Classis of Amsterdam, dated June 22, 1751. In this letter they report : (1) That Do. Steiner tries to increase the number of his adherents in Philadelphia from the new arrivals, and uses for this purpose as his assistant a student from Hanau [Germany]. That he had also in- duced Dos. Eieger and Weiss to give up their preaching for Do. Schlatter, under the pretense that each one had to care for his own congregations, and that no help could be expected from Holland. For this reason they were not present at the Coetus, held on September 12th, although they had been notified that a letter had arrived from Holland, being un- willing, (as they said) to be under the Holland yoke. (2) That Do. Bartholomaeus, as impos mentis [weak minded] was be- ing treated in the hospital. (3) That the great lack of ministers could not be overcome but by Do. Schlatter bringing over some. (4) That no peace could be expected in Philadelphia, unless they would call a neutral man, because the union of Steiner 's and Schlatter 's parties would be necessary to raise the minister's salary. (62) MINUTES OF SPECIAL COETUS HELD IN PHILA- DELPHIA, AUGUST 10-13, 1752. (Hague 74, ii. 22.) Philadelphia, August 13th, 1752. Very Reverend, Very and Well Learned Sirs, Deputies of Both Synods, etc. — Dear Fathers and Benefactors: After setting sail under God 's gracious assistance on Pente- cost, being j\Iay 17. 1752 (old style), from New Castle, we for- tunately ran into New York in good health on Tuesday, August 8th (new style), and the Sunday thereafter, by the goodness of God, we reached Philadelphia, where I lodged my brethren and fellow-ministers, partly at my house, partly with my relatives. But Do. J. Casper Rubel, even as on the journey he was self-willed, chose likewise here so to act without any change, and took lodgings at an inn, where he found an opportunity to meet those who do not wish to subject them- selves to the orders of the Very Reverend and Christian Synods. When I came to the city I found Do. Weiss there, who in his turn, to my great satisfaction, took charge of the preaching service in my church. Regarding the Rev. Brethren, Leydich and Lischy, they had continued preaching here, under much inconvenience and even reproach from the wicked and stubborn people, nevertheless they had faithfully done their duty wdthout missing a single service. Do. Steiner had a quarrel with his adherents in Phila- delphia more than six months before, and since that time has not preached here, but resides in Germantown, where, as is reported, he has agTeed to preach and conduct school for three years ; however, on hearing of my arrival on the 14th last, he preached here again in his house or church. In my absence, and upon learning of the coming of more ministers. Do. Steiner 's party sought to influence my party, and persuaded ten or twelve of them to unite with them to reject me after my arrival, the more since before my depart- ure from Philadelphia I always said that in case the congre- (63) 64 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. gation had no love for me or confidence in me I would never press myself upon it. Hence I asked permission of your Rev- erences to remain with the congreg-ation or to leave it. Thus these few, without carefully consulting about this with the congregation, and against the intention and will of the same, have entered into an agreement against me, and have resolved to chose one of the new ministers, etc. Immediately upon my arrival in Philadelphia the Rev. Brethren, Leydich and Lischy, requested permission to come here. This was very gladly granted without loss of time, because Do. Weiss remained in town. Thereafter, on Monday, the 10th, we began the first joint deliberations with the most complete love and unity, and continued till to-day. First I communicated to the aforesaid three brethren the Synodical orders and instructions, and other letters. Furthermore I respectfully requested them to give me some information of the present condition of the several congregations. Having learned this, I gave them my ideas with regard to the placing of the six ministers, namely: Do. Otterbein at Lancaster, Do. Stoy at Cocalico, Do. Waldschmidt at Philadelphia, besides myself, Do. Rubel at Tulpehocken, Do. Wissler at Egypt, Heidelberg, etc., and Do. Frankenfeld at Monocacy. This not only met with the approval of the Brethren, but was also afterwards agreed to by the new ministers, without a word of opposition, with much gladness, excepting Do. Rubel. He, after coming to the city, had deliberately taken the pains, in a way that was condemned by all the brethren, to make himself great and acceptable to the congregation, and to make me despised and hated by the same. Thus against every admonition of our Coetus, in disregard of all ministers and friends, he allowed himself to be called as their minister, in the most malevolent manner and in spite of us all. However, he has been accepted by but a portion of the congregation. What will be the result of this time alone will show. We are all of the opinion that God has permitted this in order to secure a blessed result for our remaining congre- gations which love order, etc. Mich. Schlatter. This is what we would briefly and in haste report to your Reverences, as we intend to-day to leave this city and, God being with us, go to our congregations, having resolved to hold BECORDS OF 11 52. 55 our annual Coetus on October 25th in Lancaster, and not with the perverse people of this place. Then we shall transmit an exact account, and under God's blessing, as we do now. com- municate a dutiful and unanimous report. George Michael Weiss, V. D. M., Michael Schlatter, John Philip Leydich, H. W. Stoy, Jacob Lischy, P. W. Otterbein, John Waldschmidt, J. J. Wissler, Theodore Franckenfeld. MINUTES OF COETUS HELD IN LANCASTER, OCTOBER 18-24, 1752. (Hague 74, \. 74.) Vreli'minarus of the Reformed Coetus in Pennsylvania of October 18, 1752, drawn up to our advantage and best interest. On Wednesday afternoon, the 18th, all the following-named ministers assembled in harmony in the school house at Lan- caster to take counsel together and choose officers of the Coe- tus. But before doing anything else the following articles were subscribed by us all, so that we might labor in proper unity and confidence : We, Reformed ministers of God's Word, of the American congregations in Pennsylvania, Maryland, etc., have resolved voluntarily with all our heart, and bound each other mutually by our subscription to the following articles : 1. To maintain, with God's help, our religion in all its order on the foundation of the Synod of Dort held in the years 1618 and 1619. 2. To be subordinate to the Reverend Christian Synods of Holland in all gratitude, and on occasion to submit ourselves to their fatherly counsel and Christian advice. 3. As regards our persons, office and congregations, we will allow ourselves to be guided in all circumstances which may arise, by the counsel, advice and judgment of our Coetus, and submit ourselves thereunto in pursuance of the com- mands of the Rev. Synods. 4. We pledge ourselves not only to promote the prosperity and well-being of the Reformed congi^egations in this country 5 66 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. in general and in particular, but also each undersigned brother pledges himself to promote the other's bodily and spiritual welfare, honor and esteem as if it were his own, fraternally, faithfully, conscientiously and with all earnestness, in order to induce, by the example of our unity and heartfelt love, those who look up to us to imitate us and to lead a God- pleasing life. To observe all this faithfully each one pledges himself in the fear of the Lord with all his heart. Lancaster October 18, 1752. G. M. Weiss, of Goshenhoppen, J. B. RiEGER, of Schaeffer's church M. Schlatter, J. P. Leydich, of Falkner Swamp, J. LiscHY, of York. J. Waldschmidt, of Coealieo, H. W. Stoy, of Tulpehocken, P. "W. Otterbein, of Lancaster, John Jacob Wissler, of Egypt, Theo. Frankenfeld, of Monoeacy, Jonathan Du Bois, of Northampton, Conrad Tempelmann, of Swatara. N. B. The last two signed on the 21st, after they were ordained. After this Do. Weiss, as the oldest minister, inquired of all the brethren, one after the other, who at this present session of Coetus should be appointed as president, assessor and secretary. As a result Do. Schlatter was unanimously elected president. Do. Weiss was thereupon chosen assessor, and Do. Leydich secretary. The first two accepted their offices readily, but Do. Leydich desired to be excused, asserting that it was impossible for him to sit so long, whereupon the secretaryship was offered to Do. Stoy, who accepted it with the general consent of the brethren. Up to this time affairs went well, but Do. Rubel, who, much against our will and permission, heedless of all brotherly admonition, entered into the school house by force, made an uproar, declaring with great temper and insolence that Do. Schlatter was not and must not be president, since B ECO EDS OF 1753. 67 bo had no congregation and was not looked upon as a regular minister. This ]\Ir. Rubel in Philadelphia and elsewhere, has acted hitherto contrary to the godly intentions and instructions of the Christian Synods, contrary to our Coetal regulations, and contrary to the welfare of our churches, and also here did all in his power, with two men brought from Philadelphia, to disturb us in our deliberations, undertaken in the fear of the Lord, and if possible to scatter our Coetal Assembly. He almost succeeded in his pernicious attempt, after one or two elders sided Avith him, and especially caused Do. Leydich so much trouble that his Reverence, to avoid great confusion in his congregation, was compelled to leave our Coetus, and thus for the time being, to prefer the quietness of his congre- gation to the w-ell-being of our Coetus, This example Do. AVeiss was compelled to follow against his will, by reason of the causes just mentioned, namely, the obstinacy of an elder. Upon Do. Wissler this affair had so much influence, although without any grounds, unless it were out of friendship and sympathy ^dth Do. Rubel, that he also left the Coetus, without bidding his host good-bye. In spite of all this the other brethren remained, bound together in love, and on Thursday, October 19th, at the appointed time, our Coetus was opened by the Rev. President with a sermon on Haggai i. 14. Thus we continued on the following days in peace and contentment, not without God's assistance, to our mutual encouragement. We finally closed on Tuesday, October 24, with a thanksgiving sermon by Do. Waldschmidt, on Heb. xii. 14, after everything had been faithfully recorded which had been investigated by us, decided upon and resolved to the best interests of the con- gregations. FIRST SESSION. Thursday Afternoon {Sept. 19). 1. This session, as the following sessions, was opened and closed with humble and fervent prayer by the Rev. President. 2. The Rev. President made known to the assembly, consist- ing of nearly forty persons, the instructions and letters of the Rev. Christian Synods of South and North Holland and of 68 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. the Rev. Deputies thereof, handed to him for our Coetus. He also read at the same time the minutes of the Synod of South Holland of 1751, regarding Pennsylvania, and also some pri- vate letters from the Rev. Deputy Hoedemaker. Further, the Rev. President made mention, with great em- phasis and a thankful heart, of the peculiar care, godly efforts and exceptional benevolence of the Rev. Christian Synods of South and North Holland, of the Christian Synods of other provinces, as also of the reverend and generous Classis and Consistory of Amsterdam, with which the very reverend bodies had combinedly favored Pennsylvania and, particularly, the six newly arrived ministers and himself, in a fatherly, noble and cordial manner. He added that the benefactors men- tioned above intended henceforth to take unreservedly to heart the welfare of our congregations, and even to interest the Corpus Evangelicum in Switzerland and the liberally- inclined people in Great Britain in the same object, pro- vided the Pennsylvania brethren would not, by improper conduct, stand in their own light (i. e., obstruct these meas- ures), but wnth thankfulness and a godly conduct show a united and Christian spirit. All these and many other elucidations and remarks were read aloud and made known, not only to us ministers, but also to more than thirty persons, elders for the most part, and also some other well-meaning church members, to their great encouragement, satisfaction, and gratitude to God. 3. The Rev. President reported that there had been sent to him on the part of the Synods of South and North Holland 300 unbound octavo Bibles, for which his Reverence had to pay as freight to Messrs. Shoemaker & Son, from Herborn to Rotterdam 14 pounds, and from Rotterdam to Philadelphia 3 pounds and some shillings, thus nearly 18 pounds in our country's money. 4. His Reverence also reported that 500 folio Bibles, printed in Basle in 1747, had been given by the Rev. Classis of Amsterdam to be considered as a present for those seeking their salvation, and had been received free of freight ex- penses, since neither Mr. Stedman, in Rotterdam, nor Capt. Coatam claimed the least payment for the same. His Rever- ence had expended but a half guinea as a present to the ship 's BE COEDS OF 1752. 69 crew, and but twenty shillings more to bring to his home the eight large boxes in which the Bibles were packed, so that his Reverence has expended for the 800 Bibles 19 pounds, 15 shillings and 6 pence, regarding which the Coetus was pleased to take the following action : a. That in the first place upon every pulpit, in which reg- ular ministers officiate, a large Bible be placed as a gift. b. Since there are many well-to-do people who gladly will and can pay for a Bible, it was resolved, so that the Rev. Classis of Amsterdam need not be further burdened, to meet the aforesaid expenses in the following manner: That 40 copies be set aside to be sold at 10 shillings apiece to church membere who are seekers after truth and well-to-do. c. It was considered necessary to have the unbound octavo Bibles properly bound, to be able to give them gratis to needy persons, and that 120 at the above-mentioned price be sold by the ministers ; and it was further d. Resolved to send Do. Weiss 24 copies folio Bibles, one- half to be sold and one-half to be given to the poor, and with the same understanding the others were assigned as follows: Do. Rieger, 12 copies. Do. Stoy, 24 copies. Do. Lischy, 36 copies. Do. Otterbein, 24 copies. Do. Leydich, 24 copies. Do. Frankenfeld, 12 copies. Do. Waldschmidt, 24 copies. Do. Tempelmann, 18 copies. In reg'ard to Do. Wissler's portion nothing was determined for various reasons. In case the amount of the expenses should not be reached by the sale of these Bibles, still others may be distributed in the same manner, and the Rev. President declared himself willing to give an account to Coetus of those which he might distribute at Pliiladelphia or elsewhere. e. It was regarded as necessary that the Rev. President, in the name of Coetus, should write a most earnest letter of thanks to the Rev. Christian Synods of Holland and the Rev. Classis of Amsterdam, and that he should most humbly and urgently request their continued fervent prayers, care and fatherly interest. f. His Reverence was also charged to v/rite in the same spirit to the Corpus Evangelicum in Switzerland, to the Antistes of the ministers there, and to the Upper Consisto- rium of the Electoral Palatinate (Kur-Pfaltz). 70 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. g. Also to Mr. J. Stedman in our name, thanking him for the free transportation of the 500 folio Bibles, and to what- ever other persons such letters may be deemed necessary. SECOND SESSION. {September 20) Friday Afternoon. Certain members from York, of the congregation of Do. Lischy, appeared with the request to change his Reverence to another field, if it pleased the Coetus to do so, and to send them one of the newly-arrived ministers. In pursuance thereof they brought forward, on being asked why they desired this change, the following objections, subscribed by many names : a. That Do. Lischy formerly belonged to the Moravians. b. That his Reverence wished to rule over the people. c. That there were several persons in the church who had not received the Lord's Supper for a long period. d. That his Reverence refused baptism to certain persons. e. That for the reasons mentioned above his Reverence was regarded as a hireling and scattered the sheep. f. That nearly 60 persons desired to be served by another minister. Do. Lischy 's elders of the aforesaid congregation were present, and answered the accusations just mentioned as follows : a. As regards the first complaint, his Reverence had in a public sermon made sufficient repudiation of the same. b. They knew of no such desire to rule. c. Only a few irreconcilable people remained away from the observance of the Lord's Supper, and they added that they did not think the fault lay with the minister when cer- tain persons persisted in harboring an unfounded suspicion against him. d. Do. Lischy was declared innocent of refusing baptism, and but one instance was brought forward, that of the son- in-law of the originator of all this trouble, to whom his Rev- erence six weeks ago made the offer to baptize his child pub- licly in church, but who wanted to have it baptized not by Do. Lischy, but by another minister present at the time. e. It was set forth that therefore Do. Lischy did not de- RECORDS OF 1152. 7I serve to be regarded as a hireling; on the contrary more trouble was to be looked for if these people should be granted their unrighteous request. f. Examining the number of the signers, it was found that the names of many of them were added without their eon- sent, others were persuaded and moved thereto without suffi- cient reflection; moreover, the solemn call given anew to his Reverence eighteen months ago showed how unjust was this request of these people. As a result the following resolution was submitted to them by the Coetus: With regard to the accusations of the discontented in York, it has been found after careful deliberation that their present complaints are weak, and insufficient for the removal of his Reverence. Nevertheless, the matter shall be properly and patiently investigated in due time ; but winter being at hand, and it being deemed impracticable to decide such an affair at once, the members of the congregation at York are given this friendly admonition, to abide in quietness, patience and Christian conduct, and to remember their duty tOAvard God, their conscience, their pastor and their neighbors, comporting themselves according to the law prescribed both for pastor and congregation, and in the spring everything shall be patiently and carefully investigated by two ministers com- missioned for that purpose. Signed, Do. Rieger, Do. Schlatter, Do. Frankenfeld, Do. Stoy. 2. The Rev. President read a letter from the Rev. Coetus of New York * concerning the examination and ordination of Do. David Marinus, preacher at Achquachenonk. This was a reply to a letter which the Rev. President had written to the Rev. Coetus of New York in the name and by the order of our Coetus, whereof the contents were : ''An humble request and fraternal proposition to their Reverences, Avhether it be practicable and acceptable to them * This letter of the Coetus of New York is given in full in Acts and Proceedings of the General Synod of the Kef. Protestant Dutch Church, Vol. I, p. bcriv, f . 72 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. to examine and ordain Do. Marinus by their Coetus in the name of both Synods, since Mr. ]\Iarinus, with his con- gregation, properly belonged to the Rev. Coetns of New York," etc. 3. A letter, or defense and remonstrance, by Do. Steiner was handed in, dated October 14, 1752. Our resolution re- garding it appears from the follo"s\dng answer of the Coetus: Rev. Sir and Friend: Your extensive communication having been laid before our Coetus, we have deemed it unnecessary, from lack of time and for other reasons, to reply to all the contents of the same point by point; meanwhile your reverence may be assured that our Coetus would have taken all serviceable measures, in the fear of God, to remove immediately the offences occa- sioned by you, to your own satisfaction and best interest, in the most impartial and considerate manner, if only, accord- ing to the previous invitation of Do. Schlatter, you had been willing to appear at our Coetus with the sincere purpose and readiness to attain the object mentioned above, and to be reconciled to Do. Schlatter and others, and further to submit yourself to the just advice and counsel of our Coetus. But whereas you thought it would have been prejudicial to your character to have appeared before our Coetus, and it also appears that you have scruples to be in connection with us, i. e., to enter with us into fraternal union and subordina- tion to the Netherland SjTiods, therefore we are compelled (sit venia nobis) for this time to pass you by, leaving you with God, and to let you do and write what seems good to you according to your own mind and reflection. With this view^ we have passed over the greater portion of your letter without notice, judging that we have acted in good faith, so that we can answer for ourselves in the presence of Jesus Christ and the Rev. Synods of Holland. But what you re- port about the congregation at Germantown, with reference to its claim against Do. Schlatter to a portion of the money col- lected by Jacob Reiff, we declare in a few words that we do not wish to meddle with that, since we think that this matter was settled long ago. In case of necessity Do. Schlatter will be prepared to defend himself against Germantown before the Christian Synods; on our part we would rejoice to see the BE CORDS OF 1752. to long-desired rest and peace of the Pennsylvania church after its long-continued struggles, and we would enjoy the same in the fear of God with a grateful heart. Finally, we thank you for the accompanying well-meaning verses; on our part each one of us will read them, and value and prize whatever truth they may contain. God in Christ make you and us all more perfect, i. e., humbler, heartier, more faithful and more prudent in the work whereunto we have been instructed in the schools of the church, and have been ordained by con- sistories,* and have pledged ourselves to be under the juris- diction of the church. In the name of all, farewell in the Lord Jesus Christ. J. B. Rieger. P. S. The invitation mentioned above of Do. Schlatter was unanimously approved in our Coetus by the brethren. third session. Friday Afternoon. Concerning the ministers and their congregations: 1. Do. Rieger reports that his' congregation humbly re- quests not to be omitted with regard to the benevolent con- tributions; he knows of no discontent in his congregation. 2. Do. Lischy in regard to his congregation at Kreutz Creek, where he resides, is able to rejoice in the promotion of peace, unity and confidence ; but with regard to York he is troubled, since mthin a few weeks, as mentioned above, discontent has arisen there. 3. Do. Waldschmidt being asked about the condition of his congregations, declared he was satisfied with Cocalico, White Oaks and Seltenreich, but was troubled about ]\Iuddy Creek, since Fred. Casimir Miiller, a hireling, was supported by a part of that congregation, as may be seen more par- ticularly from Do. Schlatter's journal. He desires to be installed in his congregations, and declares that each of them would contribute ten pounds and a reasonable amount of grain, i. e., wheat and oats, which he was ready to prove in writing ; finally he desired the advice of Coetus what to do in the case of IMuddy Creek. Our advice was to go on preaching * This statement does not refer to congregational consistories, but to the highest church judicatory in each state and province of Germany known as the " Consistorium. " 74 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. there until it should please the Lord to remove this hin- drance out of his way. 4. Do. Stoy thanks God for the blessing which he thinks he has observed within a short time in the two congregations at Tulpehocken, and in the third at Muehlbach; the fourth congregation, called Tolpehil, he promises to visit, and if possible to bring into a prosperous condition ; finally he is not troubled about his salary, 5. Do. Otterbein knows nothing else but to glory in peace and in God's goodness to him and his congregation. As the call made out to him shows, that which he has to expect for his salary is the sum of 45 pounds, etc. 6. Do. Frankenfeld rejoices with thanksgiving to God over his three congregations of Frederick, ]\Ionocacy and Cono- cocheague, in Pennsylvania.* 7. Do. Schlatter had no complaints to submit in regard to his congregation at Witpen, located sixteen miles from Phil- adelphia. FOURTH SESSION. (September 21) Saturday Morning. Regarding the school teachers : 1. Do. Rieger states that his congregation is able to main- tain one school teacher. 2. Do. Waldschmidt has school teachers in all congrega- tions except White Oaks ; the school teacher at Muddy Creek, in a memorial to the Coetus, requests its support. 3. Do. Lischy requests that his three school teachers be supported for a while with benevolent contributions. 4. Do. Otterbein requests that his school teacher, for his faithfulness and diligence, may not be passed over. 5. Do. Stoy petitions for a contribution to his school teachers in Muehlbach and Tolpehil, desiring that the first in particular may be favored for some time with a donation, because he still owes three pounds for his passage, for which debt the president has given security. 6. Do. Frankenfeld praises his school teacher in Monocacy,* * This ought to be Maryland, for Frederick and Monocacy. * This school teacher was Thomas Schley, as is shown by one of his letters to Schlatter, Hague 74, I. 51 (14). RECORDS OF 1752. 75 and asks that the same, as well as another, by the name of Taiiber, recently arrived in this country, may not be for- gotten. The latter has been sent for a few weeks to Cono- cocheague, with the consent of Dos. Lischy and Frankenfeld and a recommendation from the president. 7. The president intercedes for a school teacher in his congregation at Witpen, and he offers to the deliberation of the Coetus whether the school teacher, and the poor chil- dren who are unable to pay for their tuition and belong to the rebellious congregation at Philadelphia, could not be taken into consideration, so that he may also be encouraged to hope that he will be remembered in the benevolent contributions, since the children of poor people ought not to be neglected on account of evil persons. The Coetus leaves it to the presi- dent to do in this matter as he thinks best. fifth session. Saturday Afternoon. 1. The two Messrs. Du Bois and Tempelmann were exam- ined yesterday, being the 20th of this month, the first by Dos. Rieger, the president, and Waldschraidt, the other by Dos. Lischy, Stoy, Otterbein and Frankenfeld. Both were found orthodox, and the first particularly well versed in languages and the other sciences. These brethren this forenoon, before a numerous assembly and in our presence, each delivered, in his mother tongue, a brief address or ser- mon in the church here, whereupon they, again each in his mother tongue, were ordained by the Rev. President to the holy ministry ; finally they were given testimonials certifying this. 2. Concerning Do. Bartholomaeus, it was resolved to write to Mr. Conrad Weiser, and thereby ratify in the name of the Coetus what the Rev. President and Secretary on August 31st of this year promised in his ( Weiser 's) presence, namely, that Do. Bartholomaeus be relieved from the care of his con- gregation. 3. The question was raised how Do. Bartholomaeus might be aided in his distressing circumstances and his health, wdth God's blessing, be restored. He himself desired in writ- ing, in the presence and with the consent of his wife, that 76 COETUS OF PEXXSTLVAXIA. he might be sent by our Coetiis to his native country, thinking that if he could see the Palatinate again his brain and con- stitution might be restored. After careful deliberation it was resolved to send him in the care of a trustworthy man to Heidelberg at our expense, and that under no circumstances should he trouble our dear fathers in Holland with impor- tunities while passing through their country, but on the contrary we commend him directly in the most urgent man- ner to the Upper Consistory of the Electoral Palatinate. Until his departure he will be supported at our cost. Fur- ther, certain members of the Coetus have olfered to contribute towards his traveling expenses and also to solicit aid from others, so that if possible this brother, so worthy of compas- sion, may be sent over to Europe with greater comfort. sixth session. Afteexoox.* 1. A certain young man was present by the name of Hecker, who arrived in this country last year, and had begim to preach %s-ithout ordination. He requested that he might be examined and ordained by us. so that hereafter he might go on laboring with honor and quietness of conscience in his so-called con- gregations. He received this answer, that although he might produce good testimonials, our Coetus nevertheless could not possibly grant his desire, but according to its instructions (from Holland) it was obliged not only to refuse his request, but also to dissuade him from continuing his preaching, fur- ther beseeching and admonishing him not to keep on in such unadvised conduct, but to conduct himself peacefully and as a Christian. 2. The Rev. President presented several petitions from the congregations at Donegal, Indian Field, the new congrega- tion at TVhite Oaks, Conewago, and other places, which de- sired to be served occasionally with the Word and Sacra- ments. These petitions were taken into consideration, and the congregations will be attended to. with God's help by one or the other brother as far as possible in the future. 3. In regard to the congregation at Conewago, located on the other side of the Susquehanna River, it was resolved * ProbablT this ought to be Monday afternoon. EECOEDS OF 1752. 77 that it should be supplied ad interim by Dos. Otterbein, Lisehy, Frankenfeld, AValdsehmidt, Stoy, Rieger, Tempel- mann and the president in turn, once a month, and Do. Otterbein was appointed to make a beginning on November 5th of this year. 4. A representative from the congregation called Muehlbach was present, requesting, if it might please the Coetus, to put into his hands a permit to take up collections in order to pay off in this way the debt of a stone church, which request for various reasons was refused for the present. seventh session. (Tuesday) ]\Ioening. It was resolved : 1. To pay to Do. Boehm's widow, in the name of the Synod, 4 pounds of this country's money, and for this purpose to add to the 14 guilders which Do. Schlatter had received for her from the SjTiod of South Holland 38 shillings, which Do. Schlatter was willing to advance until they could be repaid TO him. 2. Do. Schlatter has turned over to the wife of Do. Dorsius, on receipt for the same. 47 guilders (Holland money), which were given to him for her by the Synod. 3. The president handed to each minister upon request two folio books bound in parchment, intended for baptisms and church records, for which he paid in Holland 44 guilders and 10 stuivers.* which sum is placed to his credit. 4. A letter sent by more than thirty members of the con- gregation at Philadelphia was read, who of their o^vn accord, ^nthout the knowledge of ]\Ir. Schlatter, humbly requested Coetus that Mr. Schlatter might be induced to minister to them, since they would have nothing to do with ]\Ir. Rubel and his independent adherents. This matter being considered in the absence of the president, it was resolved to exhort these well-meaning persons to patience for the present, and to refer them to the next Coetus to be held in the spring or possibly earlier, because by that time one or more matters may have more fully developed, and it was concluded to send to them the following communication : * A Dutch guilder is equivalent to forty and a stuiver to two cents. 78 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Very Worthy Friends: From the communication addressed to us we have observed with pleasure your disposition and desire. We justly rejoice over your praiseworthy conduct, that notwithstanding the schism at Philadelphia, you nevertheless do not only give evi- dence of proper gratitude towards our godly church fathers, but have also a praiseworthy Christian desire to be ministered unto by our beloved brother Schlatter. But after ripe delib- eration we cannot for the present approve your request imme- diately, but deem it to be more profitable for our brother Schlatter to keep himself for the present somewhat quiet and to continue in patience, the more so because he is prevented at present by many other duties from giving his thought to your special service. In the meantime we trust that you will set your minds at rest, and, lacking a regular pastor, will all the more zealously cling to the great Shepherd Jesus Christ, to which Ave encourage you. Finally commending you to God and the Avord of his grace, we remain your willing ser- vants and affectionate friends in Christ Jesus, the Coetus of Pennsylvania, in the name of all. Do. Scriba. Further, the Coetus takes the liberty to ask you, the Rev. Christian Synods, how we should act towards Dos. Steiner and Eubel. And as Do. Schlatter labors in a congregation sixteen miles from Philadelphia, but, so to speak, only ad interim, and after having given up Philadelphia from necessity and in order to avoid strife, now Avishes to rencAV his opposition to the other party, but after taking counsel with us has found it advisable to remain passive until some change might occur, Ave find ourselves obliged not only to approve his action hitherto, but also to be completely satisfied with his conduct, as he in these and other things consults A\dth us and continues to do the same. His trouble and care Avill appear from his OAvn journal, of AA^hich an extract has been read and found correct by us. We trust that he, at our request, may con- tinue to make knoAvn the circumstances of the Pennsylvania congregations faithfully, conscientiously, carefully and to our general satisfaction, to the Rev. Christian Synods and Rev. Classis of Amsterdam, and that he may retain the favor and confidence of the same, to whom Ave commend him Avith all fraternal affection. LANCASTER;, Octobcr 25, 1752. KECOFDS OF 1752. 79 N. B. The Herman original was vouched for as our will and decision, by our signatures, and the seal of the city affixed at our request. M. Schlatter, Pres. p. t., Tiieo. Frankenfeld, H. W. Stoy, Sec. p. t., Conrad Tempelmann, J. B. Rieger, Jonathan Du Bois, Jacob Lischy, Dom. Bartiiolomaeus, John Waldschmidt, G. M. Weiss, Ph. W. Otterbein, J. Ph. Leydich. N. B. The last two did not sign these minutes till May, 1753. MINUTES OF SPECIAL COETUS, HELD LN PHILA- DELPHIA, DECEMBER 12th, 1752. (Hague 74, i. 75; Amst. Portfolio No. 31.) Reverend and ^Ycll Learned Sirs, Deputies of the Reverend and CJiristia)i Synods of Soutli and Nortli Holland, our Dear and Benevolent Fathers and Brethren in Christ: "When, with God's blessing, the Coetus at Lancaster had adjourned and the minutes had been written and subscribed to by nine brethren, unanimously and in love. Do. Schlatter took the trouble to travel in person to Do. Leydich to request him, and after that also Do. Weiss, if they would likewise subscribe the same, after thej' had read them, so as not to be looked upon in Holland as offending against good order and fraternal love, but they refused to do so, and brought forward nothing but trifling objections. Therefore we resolved once more to assemble in extra ses- sion at Do. Schlatter's house at Philadelphia, where at present we are gathered in true unity of purpose, in the fear of the Lord and by His goodness. We deem it our duty to declare to your Reverences in sincerity, fidelity and without guile the reasons preventing us hitherto from most humbly communicating a gladdening account of the state of our Pennsylvania churches, and what thus far has thwarted your good intention, the execution of your instructions, and a more pleasing progress. An unhappy instrument was Do. Rubel, who set himself in a most malicious, rude and disorderly manner against all 80 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. our fraternal expostulations in Philadelphia, and served a portion of the congregation there as minister. This has caused a great commotion and scandal throughout the land. People say, first of all, if the preachers betray one another in so detestable a manner, having no regard for the church- order to which their word is pledged, but on the contrary giving evidences of disloyalty, rebelliousness and irregularity, how can we be admonished and persuaded by the same to peace, unity, yea, to eternal blessedness? Thus Do. Rubel's reckless and unbecoming conduct did great harm, and, in the second place, had great influence upon Do. Steiner, who, see- ing how a younger preacher set himself with such confidence against the instructions of the Rev. Synods and our Coetus, took courage, and also asserted himself, and refused to act in conjunction with our Coetus, except on condition that Do. Schlatter be excluded, on the ground of old but unfounded accusations, wherewith he seeks to brand Do. Schlatter against all reason, in order to justify his unwarranted behavior against him. And although we permit Do. Rubel and Do. Sleiner to labor undisturbed in their congregations, yet neither of them is satisfied, but they attempt to persuade other brethren and congregations likewise to be disobedient and independent, pretending that the promised donations from Holland and elsewhere, which according to Do. Schlatter were to be expected, were nothing but fraudulent invention and falsehood, wherewith he led the people by the nose, so to speak. Besides, these objections are having much influence upon Dos. Weiss and Leydich, who, however, would doubtless have remained steadfast and of a fraternal spirit, if Do. Schlatter had brought Avith him a purse full of gold for them; but there is no doubt that they will recognize their inconstancy and thoughtlessness and come back to us, if only those will be provided for on the part of the Christian Synods who remain loyal to the orders of the Synods and in subordi- nation to them. We are compelled to express our opinions emphatically with regard to these two brethren, but as re- gards their persons, we leave them with God, and believe that they have more piety than wisdom and prudence. Their actions, however, against us and our Coetus are felt by us for the time being most painfully and keenly. Before we began BECOSDS OF 1752. g^ this session their presence was requested several times in writ- ing, in the most fraternal manner, by Dos. Schlatter and Rie- ger, Lischy and Du Bois. From the first and last they re- ceived during the last week an oral invitation, but their ansAver was that they had already had too much expense on account of the Coetus, and that they also must first get permission from their congregations to attend. As regards Do. Wissler, located at Egypt, at no great distance from Dos. Weiss and Leydich, he is more of a friend to Dos. Steiner and Rubel than to us, and we are also afraid that he will not come up to our expectations. Neither did he come to this meeting, but sent in writing the following excuses, viz., "that he had an engagement to preach, and to marry a couple, that he had to visit the sick and had house visitations on hand, nor could he leave his "wdfe alone, and that he had no money for the journey. ' ' Further, he desired if anything was to be signed, that it be done in his name by Dos. Weiss, Leydich or Frankenf eld. " At this session we endeavored, but in vain, to make Do. Steiner realize his duty, first in writing, then orally by Dos. Otterbein and Stoy, and finally again by letter. With regard to the congregation in Philadelphia, Do. Schlatter has thus far remained passive, notwithstanding that there always have been many people in Philadelphia who insisted that he should again serve as their pastor even as before his departure. Your Reverences can see from the Coetus minutes of this year that from said people a request was handed in to Coetus, but it was not deemed advisable at the time to do anything else in the matter than to send the letter contained in the minutes to these people. But now these people have learned that we are again in session, and of their own accord have once more insisted and petitioned that Do. Schlatter might be induced by us to preach the Gospel to them in accord- ance with our Coetal regulations, and to lead their souls unto salvation. This matter seemed to us so important and so very delicate that we did not discuss the matter only among ourselves, but also consulted certain great patrons, Presbyterian theologians and other friends, who were unanimously of our opinion, that Do. Schlatter ought not to withdraw himself, nor longer decline to preach in this 6 82 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. place before orderly people desirous of hearing him. It was even regarded by all the friends as the most efficient means by which esteem for the Christian Synod, church discipline and order, brotherly love, and the general care of those desir- ing salvation, could be maintained, and on the other hand by which the evil efforts of independent and disorderly people could be counteracted. In consideration thereof Do. Schlatter was fraternally requested by us to offer his services to this good end, and to serve the above-mentioned people as their pastor. Whereupon his Reverence declared himself willing to undertake this work, relying upon God's help, after two Presbyterian ministers had each of their own accord offered his church to him for divine services. In consequence of this, notice was given last Saturday, that on the follov/ing day, and thereafter, services would be held in the large and beautiful church mentioned above, which were held on this occasion by Do. Stoy in the morning and Do. Rieger in the evening, in the presence of a numerous and attentive congregation which exceeded all our expectations. After the sermon the following was read to the audience : "After we, united ministers, had assembled once more, in the name of the Lord, to consider some necessary matters per- taining to the Reformed congregations, we learned that there was not a small but a large number of right-minded and order- loving people in this city who had had no part in the disorder and confusion hitherto prevailing, but on the contrary have shown themselves to be cordially and willingly devoted to the order of our Reformed church, and wish henceforth to be guided and assisted . by the Coetus. Consequently it was deemed necessary by us that our dear colleague. Do. Schlatter, after the repeated earnest solicitations he had received, should preach here, in order to proclaim the Word of God to those who seek their salvation and desire to hear him, and not with the object of forcing himself upon a people who do not want him, but only in fulfilment of his duty and obligation to care for such as heartily desire his services, to which, as we trust, God in Christ will add His pi-ecious blessing. ' ' We must add most humbly and with all reverence, that moved by the most tender esteem and gratitude, we assure your Reverences that under God's blessing, with his aid and BE COEDS OF 1752. 33 the power of his Spirit, we shall continue to uphold, although in feebleness, but faithfully and zealously, modestly, and as far as possible, prudently, your commands and instructions, and maintain our subordination to you. We are of good courage that the same God who has blessed the efforts of your Eeverences and through you those of our dear brother. Do. Schlatter, will be pleased further to make his strong arm and all-wise providence felt in this land. If your fervent prayers with ours shall be acceptable to the glorified Jesus, the great Head of the church, and shall be heard by the Father, there can be no doubt that neither Satan nor his agents shall con- quer us, as may be seen Jer. xv. 15-21. If only your Rever- ences will be kind enough not to lose faith in us brethren, but will be pleased according to your wisdom to judge those reports that are current against us, by their own contents and according to the merits of the several persons from whom they may come, and will generously help us forward and encourage us, then, in our feeble opinion, yet salvo meliori [subject to correction] shall our opponents in vain stir up strife, and the wavering come back of their own accord. We cannot omit to note, in a few words, that Do. Schlatter during his absence drew no salary from the congregation, but it was paid to those of his colleagues who took his place. And since that time he has had nothing but heavy expenses, and, moreover, remains uncertain as to what remuneration he will receive for his services here, which in all likelihood will not be large during the first year. Further, in the name of the Deputies, he has handed over to Dos. Weiss, Leydich and Lischy, each one, 50 guilders, entrusted to him before his departure from Holland, together with a letter and a rider * from the Rev. Deputy Hoedemaker. After wishing your Reverences God's most precious bless- ings in all respects, we herewith commend ourselves to you with the most dutiful gratitude and most respectful offer of our feeble services. * A Dutch gold coin worth fourteen guilders, or $5.63 according to the Standard Dictionary. See Coins. 84 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Your Reverences' most humble servants and grateful brethren, Philadelphia, December 12, 1752. Henry Wm. Stoy, J. B. RiEGER, Jacob Lischy, John Waldschmidt, Conrad Tempelmann, Ph. "W. Otterbein, N. B. The last two did not sign this till May 29, 1753. Jonathan Du Bois, Theodore Frankenfeld, Michael Schlatter, George Michael Weiss, John Phil. Leydich. MINUTES OF THE COETUS HELD IN LANCASTER, APRIL 26, 1753. (Hague 74, i. 79; Amst. Portfolio, No. 59.) PEEFACE. Lancaster, April 26th, 1753. Inasmuch as Do. Schlatter received letters in the begin- ning of March from the Rev. Christian Synods of South and North Holland, which were dated by the Rev. Deputies of both Synods, October 1752, and delivered to the Messrs. Zacharias and Isaac Hope, of Rotterdam, with an order that their friends in Philadelphia pay to him 2,523 guilders [$1,009.20] Holland money in the name of the aforesaid Synods, the aforesaid gentlemen paid to Do. Schlatter through Messrs. Benjamin and Samuel Shoemaker, of Phila- delphia, the sum of 360 pounds and 9 shillings, Pennsylvania currency. This he reported to his colleagues, not only to the undersigned, but also, for the sake of love and peace, to Dos. Weiss, Leydich and Wissler, whom he invited in the most friendly manner to a meeting at Readingtown (a newly laid out city near Tulpehocken) on the 25th of this month. Some of us submitted to him, salvo meliori [subject to cor- rection], that for several reasons we would prefer, if accept- able to him, to have the aforesaid meeting transferred to Lancaster. To this proposition he agreed, and invited all the brethren mentioned above to Lancaster, where at present we have arrived through God's goodness, in health, and have this day begun our meeting. FIRST session. The meeting was opened with a fervent prayer by Do. Rieger. 1. Do. Schlatter suggested that another president be elected in his place to preside over the meeting on this occa- sion, but we unanimously requested him to please continue as such, and to preside over our assembly without further objections. 2. The president handed to us the letters of the Rev. (85) 86 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Deputies of both Synods, and at the same time left to the meeting the disposition of the donations received by him. He first handed in a bill for those thirty pounds sterling or 360 Holland guilders which he had borrowed on account of the Rev. Synods the year before in NeAv Castle; hence a large part of this sum was given to him in advance from the donations. After this the donations were divided and applied, in accordance with the Christian intention of the Rev. Synods, in the following manner: s. 3. To Do. Rieger, although he made no actual claim, for the reason that he is blessed of God with temporal possessions, was given the sum of 8 4. Do. Lischy having been asked how much he could expect from his congregation, answered that he could expect between 40 and 50 pounds, but the amount was rather uncertain ; further, he stated that since the arrival of the new ministers he had made several expensive journeys; also that he had pre- viously had considerable expense in the printing of a certain circular,* adding that if only the said ex- penses were in some way made good to him he \\t)uld be fully satisfied; hence there was assigned to him. Expenses for circular £ 5 Traveling expenses "15 Supplement to salary "10 — 30 5. Do. Stoy having been asked concerning the circumstances of his congregation and the amount of his salary, answered that he hoped to receive 40 pounds, hence there was assigned to him . . £ 27 10 Traveling expenses " 2 5 29 15 6. Do. Otterbein expected 45 pounds from his con- gregation, and to him were assigned, inclusive of 50 guilders Holland currency, or £7. 10 s. 5 pence, Pennsylvania currency, which were made over by * It is entitled : Circular Schreiben der Vereinigten Eef ormirten Prc- diger in Pennsylvanien, etc. Lancaster, 1752. BECOEDS OF 1753. 87 £. s. the Rev. Deputies to his mother £ 22 10 Traveling expenses " 2 24 10 7. Do. Waldschmidt, who put his income at 40 pounds, drew , 27 10 8. Do. Frankenfeld could estimate his salary at 50 pounds, and received from us £ 17 10 For expenses * " 3 18 21 8 9. Do. Tempelmann being asked for the circum- stances of his congregation, answered that although the income from his ministry was not large, yet he suffered no lack in temporal things, hence there was assigned to him a honorarium of 6 15 10. Do. Du Bois stated that his income was 50 pounds, and because he w^as only ordained last fall, there were allotted to him 10 16 11. To Do. Bartholomaeus who, through Do. Schlatter's interposition, is at present in the hos- pital at Philadelphia, where we are obliged to pay for his board and the service rendered, was assigned by order of Synods the sum of £ 35 Also to reimburse the Rev. Presi- dent for expenses previously in- curred for him "10 17 45 17 12. To the deserted wife of Do. Dorsius was as- signed, inclusive of £6 which were given to her by the Synod of North Holland, from the donations the sum of 8 Brought forward 212 13 SECOND SESSION. 1. Do. Schlatter having been asked what he had to expect in his present circumstances from his con- gregations at Philadelphia and AVitpen, answered that his income could not be estimated at more than about 28 pounds, but if he should get more than that. 88 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. £. he was ready to render an account thereof, and left it to our judgment to assign him as much as we should see fit. After we had taken into account his circumstances, it Avas resolved, in his absence, to as- sign to him at present the sum of 60 For although it had been our desire to assign some- what more to him on account of heavy traveling ex- penses, expensive provisions, wood, and house rent at Philadelphia, the more so because we were assured that house rent, wood, and maintenance of a house cost him 50 pounds, yet it was at the time impossible to designate more for him, inasmuch as we had al- ready disposed of most of the money, and had re- solved to remember the school teachers. 2. As regards Dos. Weiss, Leydich and Wissler, none of them appeared at our meeting on this occa- sion, but they replied to two different letters of Do. Schlatter, that if Dos. Steiner and Rubel were not regarded as integral members of our Coetus, they would not come, although they had resolved to come to Reading. But they held back when the place of meeting was changed, possibly for the reason that at our last meeting in October at Lancaster they had behaved themselves so obstinately, thoughtlessly and offensively that they had thereby lost the esteem of the congregation. Nevertheless we wished to ob- serve our obligations toward them, and in the hope that in time they would repent left for them in the hands of Do. Schlatter 60 notifying them that the money would be given them provided they approved the Acts of our several As- semblies, also subscribed them, and for the remain- der conducted themselves submissively as members of the Rev. and Christian Synods and like us sub- ordinate thereto. We further made known to them most emphatically various considerations aiming at unity. 3. Finally the following named school-masters were aided from the donations. But we must make RE COEDS OF 1753. gg this apology in advance. Dos. Steiner and Rubel by a spirit of independence, Dos. Weiss, Leydich and Wissler by imprudent conduct and unbrotherly dealings, had maintained and increased the suspicion and dissension existing between ministers and churclies, so that after Do. Schlatter's arrival the churches usually had to be handled very prudently and carefully. Indeed, one hardly dared to influ- ence them to their dutiful obligation to pay their ministers, for fear they would, like those of Ger- mantown, Philadelphia, Goshenhoppen, etc., with- draw themselves, to the detriment of their own welfare, from all good order, subordination and Christian discipline, and thus make the confusion general. This, Rev. Fathers and Brethren, is the true and only reason why our ministry is so difficult, our labor so fruitless, our religion so despised, our income so uncertain, and the school teachers usually are brought into the most deplorable circumstances. For this reason also, they could not be remembered at this time according to our desire and their de- serts, and but a few of the most needy could be rewarded and encouraged in the following manner: £. s. Brought forward 332 13 1. The school-teacher at Lancaster... £6 2. The one at Monocacy "6 3. The one at Witpen "4 4. The one at Tulpehocken "4 5. The one at Kreutz Creek "3 6. The one at Cothoras [Codorus] . . " 2 7 7. The one at Goshenhoppen "5 8 — — 30 15 Sum total £363 8 Regarding the school-teachers at Philadelphia, Coealico, Falkner's Swamp, Frederick and other places who may be in need, the Rev. President has taken it upon himself to assist them as far as possible in another way. At the same time the Rev, President has been instructed to have a small cate- 90 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. chism printed, for the benefit and edification of the youth,, on the same principle that last winter already, at his own expense, he had a thousand ABC books printed, most of which he had distributed for nothing and sold the re- mainder for half price, in order that the youth might not be neglected because of the lack of these books. The presi- dent further reported that he had been compelled to take up at New Castle the 30 pounds sterling, already mentioned in the account, and had been forced to lose 30 guilders, Holland currency, when the draft came in, since 30 pounds sterling only equal the sum of 330 Dutch guilders. And at the same time he suggested that the whole body could better bear that loss than himself, hence 30 guilders were added to his ac- count, in order that they may be refunded to him next year,, inasmuch as this year there is no money in the treasury. His account is as follows, namely, the above-mentioned 30 guilders, or rather 4 pounds 10 s. ; the contribution to the widow Boehm, £1. 18 s. ; expenses of Coetus in Philadelphia last November, 4 pounds; traveling and other expenses, 10 pounds; postage, 2 pounds; total of what Do. Schlatter is entitled to draw in the future, the sum of £22. 8 s. Finally, after prayer and thanksgiving to God by the Rev. President^ we separated from each other in love and peace, after unanimously subscribing the Minutes, and after having wished one another blessing and prosperity. Michael Schlatter, Conrad Tempelmann, J. B. RiEGER, John Waldschmidt, J. LiscHY, Jonathan Du Bois, W. Stoy, Ph. W. Otterbein, Theo. Frankenfeld, Lancaster, April 27, 1753, Philadelphia, May 29th, subscribed by George Michael Weiss, John Philip Leydich. MINUTES OF COETUS, HELD IN LANCASTER, OCTOBER 9-10, 1753. (Amst, Portfolio, No. 61.) Lancaster, October 9, 1753. The following ministers, namely, Dos. Rieger, Lisehy, Otterbein, Du Bois and Schlatter, came together in the fear of the Lord, in order to reply to your Reverences' letter addressed to our Coetus (and liitherto remaining in Do. Leydich's hands) in the best possible and most dutiful manner. But in order to give your Reverences a proper idea of the course of our affairs, we shall first of all insert an extract or narrative from Do. Schlatter's Journal of what has occurred since the end of April, since the adjournment of our Coetus at which the 2,523 guilders received by us were distributed. Do. Schlatter informs us that Dos. Weiss and Leydich, at his fraternal and friendly invitation, paid him a visit in Philadelphia on May 29th, when just by chance Do. Du Bois was staying with him, being engaged in transcribing the minutes of Coetus, towards whom they manifested the greatest friendliness, expressing to him their sorrow concern- ing the several differences that had arisen, and proposing to effect a general peace, declaring as before God that they had nothing against his Reverence, Do. Schlatter, nor had written anything against him to your Reverences, but on the contrary disapproved of Do. Rubel's unwarranted actions, and were decidedly of the opinion that he would not long be able to maintain himself. Whereupon Dos. Schlatter and Du Bois declared that there was not sufficient ground to believe their seemingly sincere protestations, unless with a good conscience and cor- dially they would ratify by their own signatures the several Acts of our several Coetus meetings taken in their absence. Thereupon Do. Schlatter read to them and allowed them to read all the aforesaid Acts, which they voluntarily sub- scribed, only making the exception that the remark made at our second Coetus (namely, that they would have remained (91) 92 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. steadfast if Do. Schlatter bad brought with him a well-filled purse of gold) was not the motive that made them leave the Coetus, but that they had left only to maintain love and peace among their congregations, inasmuch as they were not in favor of subordination to Holland and to our Coetal insti- tutions and directions. The friendly attitude of these two brethren was so pleasing to me, that of my own accord I addressed them, after the departure of Do. Du Bois, as follows : " I think I can observe that your purpose is peace, and it seems to me that, to my extreme joy, you will sincerely seek to promote the well-being of our distressed church affairs in the future. For this reason I shall hand to each of you, although without orders, ten pounds of the donations on account, in the expectation that you will take no advantage (as has been done before) of this my indulgence and sincere love towards you." Whereupon they indeed accepted the money, but at tlie same time demanded a larger sum from me, which at that time I had to refuse for various reasons. On July 10 I received an esteemed letter from the Rev. Classis of Amsterdam dated [April 2, 1753],* wherein, among other things, express mention was made that those who under inhatsoever pretext had left the Coetus must go ivithout the donations imtil further orders from the Rev. Synods and the Bev. Classis of Amsterdam aforesaid. A few days afterwards I received a letter from Do. Leydich, in which he claimed with all seriousness from me 19 pounds and a half more of the donations, and this being refused, the above-mentioned pre- tended love grew feeble, and he and Do. Weiss gave me to understand that they would have nothing to do with me if they could expect no more money from me. Shortly afterwards I received several letters from the Rev. Deputies and from the Rev. Classis of Amsterdam, among others one for Do. Weiss and one for Do. Leydich. The first I sent away at once, and the other I kept until the arrival of Do. Leydich (whom I expected any day, as by promise on his part). But a week later I learned that he had spent several days in Philadelphia with one of my bitterest enemies. I * A copy of this letter is still in existence, Amst., Vol. XXXI., p. 1. RECORDS OF 1753. 93 sent word several times with humble request that he would come to me, as I had a letter for him, but he refused to come and sent for the letter. But it happened that Do. Stoy, of Tulpehockeu, who the Sunday previous had preached for me here, was still in the city and offered to bring him to my house. I gave him the letter for Do. Leydich, in case the Domine would not accompany him, but he had the good for- tune to induce Leydich, though with great difficulty, to come back with him. Here I must not forget, in passing, to mention something which might be explained to your Reverences possibly to my prejudice, as will appear from the following conversation with Do. Leydich in the presence of Do. Stoy: "Brother Leydich an (unintentional) accident or mistake has happened to your letter from the Rev. Deputies of Synod, inasmuch as I hurriedly opened it for my own; but as you see, I have sealed it again with my own seal, and I am ready to make you all proper apology before the Synods, or to our Coetus, or elsewhere." "He promised with hand and by mouth, taking God to witness, not to think evil of me, and never to speak of it to anybody." (But before Do. Leydich left Philadelphia he told the incident of the said letter to Do. Rubel, who cast it up to Do. Stoy, to the latter 's great astonishment.) After that I had a very pleasant con- versation with him (Leydich), but at the same time informing him (for reasons at the time best knoAvn to the Rev, Deputies and the Rev. Classis of Amsterdam and myself alone) that for a while I would be merely an onlooker, and would have little interest in Pennsylvanian affairs, but would expect the well-being of the same to be promoted by others better than by me. In the meantime I cannot refrain from remarking with all humility, that the letter addressed to our Coetus by the Rev. Deputies of Synods, and enclosed in that to Do. Leydich, has made Dos. Weiss and Leydich so overbearing and obsti- nate that the dissension and distrust between the brethren and churches has been greatly increased thereby; and Do. Leydich assumed to have orders from your Reverences to call a meeting of Coetus in spite of me, and imagined himself, with Dos. Weiss, Steiner and Rubel, sustained in regard to the 94 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. accusations brought the preceding year before your Rever- ences against our Coetus, myself and others. Therefore most of the brethren were invited only on the 5th of September, after it was too late for them, to convene on the 10th of the same month, in order to hold a Coetus at the house of Do. Weiss. On the 10th of September, being the day set for the Coetus, I was obediently present with a delegated elder, but was received veiy coldly and contemptuously by the assem- bly, especially by Dos. Weiss, Leydich, Steiner, Rubel and Waldschmidt. I took the liberty to inquire where all the ministers were, inasmuch as Dos. Rieger, Lischy, Otterbein, Wissler and Du Bois were not present. I received a cool reply, and in regard to the last, Do. Leydich said: "AVho can think of eveiytliing ; he was forgotten ! ' ' On the other hand Dos. Steiner and Rubel were present, each accompanied by two stoutly-built elders, and besides there were present sev- eral dozen strange elders or farmers. I had scarcely been a quarter of an hour in this crowd of people when Do. Rubel and some others began to attack and abuse me bitterly, so tliat I was compelled to declare that if I was only summoned to be abused, scolded and slandered, I would prefer to return home immediately. But some prom- ised me freedom from attack and better treatment, until I finally saw an opportunity to submit calmly and modestly that I must enter a protest against such an irregular Coetus, since five preachers, and therefore the half of the qualified brethren, were absent ; also that it was contrary to the intent of my Rev. Church Fathers in Holland that more elders than preachers should have a seat and a vote ; and finally that there were certain preachers present who for the present could not be admitted to a seat and a vote. The following reasons prevented me from approving this Coetus with a good con- science : 1. Do. Leydich had so arranged it that several young preachers should stay with Do. Weiss and himself from the 5th to the 10th, possibly to prejudice them against me and others. 2. The 10th fell upon a Monday, and most of the ministers if they had wished to be present at the appointed time would have had to spend Sunday in traveling, and to neglect their congregations. BE COEDS OF 1753. 95 3. Goshenlioppen is in a corner of the country, and an inconvenient locality for most of the brethren, since some had to travel almost 150 miles or more. There was also no pressing occasion for such a meeting. 4. No certificate was required from any minister or elder, but all were granted a seat and a vote without distinction. 5. No sermon was preached or prayer offered, no president chosen nor a secretary appointed; accordingly pen, ink and paper were accounted unnecessary articles. Nothing but a good-sized bottle of wine had the honor to stand upon the table in the midst of the reverend brethren above mentioned. All of this I, seated in a corner of the room, was forced with sorrow to observe. 6. I can testify that I did not hear a word of edifica- tion at this Coetus, except the Synodical letter to Do. Ley- dich which was opened and read. In a word, this session was opened with reproaches, continued with quarrels and offenses, and finished with provocation and slander, so that after attending it for two or three hours, with Do. Stoy and others, I returned home again. But before my departure I arranged with Dos. Stoy, Frank- enfeld, Tempelmann and Wissler (the last arriving only as we were leaving) to hold our regular annual Coetus on the last Tuesday of the same month at Lancaster. To this end I wished to take along the letter to our Coetus, in order that the same might then be taken into proper consideration by our absent brethren, but the letter was not entrusted to me, and Dos. Rieger, Lischy, Otterbein and Du Bois have never yet seen this letter of Synod. When Dos. Weiss and Ley- dich had learned that the regular Coetus was appointed they endeavored to prevent the same, and to thwart with all their power our good intentions of sending a proper reply to the Eev. Deputies. Immediately after Do. Stoy, myself and others had left. Do. Weiss was chosen president, and they arranged to hold, in spite of us, a so-called Coetus only 10 miles from Lancaster, in an inconvenient locality, at Cocalico, and but 14 days after the authorized day fixed by themselves some years ago,* so that thereby a division was caused, and * Cf. Minutes of 1748, art. 1. 96 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. some of the yoiing preachers did not know what to do, whether they should attend Coetus on the 25th of September or the 9th of October. Meantime I, in all friendliness and brotherliness, invited Dos. Weiss and Leydich to come to Lancaster on the 25th (of which letter a copy follows here) : "Although some time ago I had intended to let affairs take their own course, yet they began to take such an unfortunate turn that I could no longer be at ease. I have therefore consulted with Do. Otterbein, of Lancaster, and others, and Do. Otterbein was requested to write to Do. Weiss about as follows : "Although it was our duty to attend our regularly ap- pointed annual Coetus, yet we were willing in order to prevent great confusion and offense throughout the land to come to them to Cocalico on certain conditions, namely, that it be conducted decently, and not as at Goshenhoppen at Do. Weiss 's house; that Do. Weiss for the time being could not be recognized as president ; that Rubel and such a large num- ber of elders must stay away; that the ministers (if possible) ought first of all to come together, and then Coetus could be held in conjunction with the elders at another more conve- nient time, when it could be done with more edification." FIRST SESSION. But since from a letter of Do. Weiss, and other credible reports, we had sufficient evidence that the conditions men- tioned above would not be accepted, we assembled this day, and for fear it would again turn out to be a Polish Parlia- ment we passed the following resolution, namely : Once more to send to Cocalico to Dos. AVeiss, Leydich and others of the brethren, prejudiced by deceit and unwarrant- able methods, a deputation from our midst, namely, Dos. Lis- chy, Otterbein and Stoy, with two calmly disposed elders, and thus anew to invite the same to accept the aforesaid conditions, and to consider dispassionately what injuiy and harm has already been done by their personal jealousy, false and un- brotherly conduct, and might still be expected ; and that they might have in view, out of love to God and his heritage, their own best interests, to come over to us to Lancaster, to HECOEBS OF 1753. 97 help us promote, under God's guidance, with one aim the best interests of the brotherhood and of the declining state of the church. But alas, all was in vain. Our deputa- tion was very coldly received and subjected to unbrotherly treatment. It seemed as if they were hardened and blinded by Satan, since they would not even listen to wholesome pro- posals, but showed themselves tilled with anger, pride, wilful- ness and desire to rule, appealing to your Reverences' orders, by virtue of which they claimed that Do. Weiss was ap- pointed president. Besides Steiner, Rubel and about 30 or more farmers were present, who (talking most overbear- ingly) prevented our deputies from having any private con- versation with one or other of the ministers, and abused them and also the rest of us. Taking all this into considera- tion, after the return of the aforesaid brethren, we deliberated as to whether it would be practicable or advantageous if we all should betake ourselves thither in a body (according to the promise of one of our delegates, who had taken it upon himself to persuade the others thereto), but we have unanimously decided not to meet with them, or for the time being have any communication with them, since we are profoundly con- vinced that they are violating your Reverences' orders, are frustrating through lack of judgment the well-being of our Coetus in particular, and the upbuilding and edification of our churches in general, and are seeking to bring themselves into conflict with us. AVe could, in our judgment, do noth- ing more as Christian men, except send them one more friendly but earnest letter, which, however, Avas not well received by them. SECOND SESSION. Subsequently, after prayers on the subject, we took under consideration what it would be our duty to report to your Reverences in these dark and soul-trying circumstances. We must confess, Rev. Fathers, that we are ashamed to commu- nicate such disagreeable and distressing accounts. Never- theless we shall make known to you the true condition of affairs just as they are, and humbly pray and expect from you well tried remedies, as from our physicians, whereby the wounds and divisions of our Coetus may be healed, and 7 98 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. the breaches of our Zion be repaired, and we at the same time be cheered by our prayerful and careful Fathers, so greatly inclined to pity, from whom we confidently expect good counsel, effectual support and real help. Thus we take the liberty to submit to your Reverences the following for consideration : 1. It appears to us very distressing when we reflect (hav- ing to deal with the poverty of Pennsylvania and the miser- able condition of the ignorant peasantry among whom we have to struggle without having any established authority, as in the Fatherland), that it pleases your Eeverences to treat such ministers as have caused and still continue public schism, with equal consideration as ourselves, who endeavor to conduct ourselves strictly according to church order; that you honor them as brethren by your Reverend letters, of which they openly boast before the lawless and independent people, throwing suspicion upon us and pre- tending that you approve of their actions and condemn us. Especially since your Reverences in your letter to us have not seen fit to communicate to us any direct and definite decision regarding their unwarranted actions violating the 80th article of our Church-Order.* 2. It seems strange to us (when one or another of the brethren is accused behind his back by private letters not authorized by Coetus) that your Reverences can consent to accept such accusations as well founded, and without delay, or any defense, place the accused in the wrong, or indeed con- demn him utterly, not taking account of the persons, whether they may not advance the accusations for personal reasons, or whether they are faithful members of our Coetus, and * The eightieth article of the Church-Order of the Synod of Dort reads: "Further, among the grave sins, which deserve to be punished with suspension or deposition from the ministry, these are the most note- worthy, false doctrine or heresy, creation of schism, flagrant blasphemy, simony, faithless abandonment of one's service, or invasion into the field of another minister, perjury, adultery, theft, habitual drunkenness, in short, all those grave offenses which cause their author to lose all respect before the world and are deemed worthy of excommunication in case of an ordinary member of the church." Edition of Rotterdam, 1733, pp. 39 f. BE COEDS OF 1753. 99 well-wishers of your Reverences, and of the state of our Penn- sylvania churches. (See the private letter to Do. Schlatter.) Bear with us, Rev. Fathers, that we in singleness of heart, yet not without courage, must declare and once for all inform you that, you doing thus, we shall not be able to maintain church order and discipline, nor to uphold our Coetus, nor our reputation, nor to expect any fruit from our labors among the churches. But we see ourselves compelled to testify without reserve that we will have to pack our goods and, like foolish and useless servants, seek our bread behind the plow [become farmers], or in places where we may expect better results, for there will never be a lack of one or more ambitious or envious persons, without conscience, who will undertake to build upon the ruins of another, if it costs no more trouble than to send a couple of letters full of unfounded accusations behind one's back to Europe, and if with such they can attain their object, and are able to find welcome and credence. Who of us would be able, with or without a family, to sleep in peace or minister to his church, if those who have done real service and given tried proofs of their care and love for the poor Pennsylvania churches, are exposed to suddenly falling into disfavor and disgrace? 3. Your Reverences informed us in the letter to our Coetus, sent with Do. Schlatter the previous year, that he had ac- cused no one either before the Rev. Synods or before your Reverences, but that he had laid the affairs before you in the best possible form, flattering himself with the good hope that one or another would come to their senses and be convinced that their best interests are cared for. But we are now forced unitedly in our own defense to report the following : a. Do. Weiss has not been loyal for the last three years in his subordination to your Reverences nor to our Coetus, but has claimed (like the rebellious people at Philadelphia) to be independent with his congregation, and were it not for the donations would trouble himself little about your Reverences, since he had not by any means faithfully conducted the ser- vices for Do. Schlatter in his absence (as is proved by the let- ter addressed to your Reverences by Dos. Leydich and Lischy in the year 1751) until he heard that Do. Schlatter had secured something profitable. Further, he would have no scruples 100 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. to intrude upon the neighboring congregation of Do, John Frielinghuysen * had he not been restrained by one special reason or another. Finally he shows such unheard of incon- sistency, that he will in one hour oppose something which in the nex^ he adopts and subscribes, as appears from the reso- lutions taken by our Coetus against Do. Leydich, which he readily signed and approved. b. Regarding Do. Leydich. Ever since he came to this coun- try he has gone into the three congregations in New Jersey^ namely, Amwell, Rockaway and Foxhill, which w^ere at that time served by Do. Schlatter, and, unknown to Do. Schlatter, administered the IJoly Sacraments. And because Do, Schlat- ter rebuked this irregularity, submitting that it was not fraternal to take aw^ay the small remuneration which had hitherto come to him from these congregations, Do. Leydich was so much offended by it that since that time he has told some of us that he had taken a just dislike to Do, Schlatter, He has also attempted to secure a call to the aforesaid con- gregations, but because they could not get the call (according to his desire) signed and ratified by Do, Du Bois at New York, and only called him for ten years, the affair came to nothing. Meantime these three congregations were thrown thereby into great confusion, and Rockaway alone is now served by Do. J. C, AVirts, of whom mention is made in Do. Schlatter's printed journal, pp. 11 and 23,** who through the aid of Dos. Weiss and Leydich was ordained by an English Presbytery *** while Do. Schlatter was in Europe. Another thing which may give some light to your Rever- ences in these confused circumstances, is that Do, Leydich con- stantly allows himself to be guided and directed by certain ambitious and obstinate elders (who are influential with Do, Schlatter's sworn enemies at Philadelphia), They have helped him to obtain possession of a piece of land of nearly 200 acres, having loaned, or at least secured for him, the necessary money. For this reason he must carry out what- * Jolin Frielinghuysen was pastor at Earitan, Six Mile Run, etc., N. J.,, from 1750-1754. ** See life of M. Schlatter, by Dr. H. Harbaugh, pp. 137 and 162. *** The Presbytery of New Brunswick, on June 5, 1752. EECOFDS OF 1753. IQl ever comes into their heads, and especially oppress and per- secute those who will not be the slaves of these elders. Hence Do. Schlatter and we must be thwarted in all our efforts. It is also very strange to us that these two gentlemen have made no mention to you of the receipt of the 50 fl. [florins- guilders] from Do. Schlatter, although the following receipt was given by Do. Weiss 's own hand : Philadelphia, August 13, 1752. Eeceived by order of Rev. Christian Synods of Holland, from Do. Schlatter, immediately upon his arrival, Fifty Guilders. George Michael Weiss. On the same day of the aforesaid month received the same amount. J. P. Leidig, J. J. LiSCHY. Yfe can pass over many other things with silence, since the above will sufficiently show their character and conscience. In one word we can declare, if Dos. Weiss and Leydich, on the arrival of Do. Schlatter, had not played into the hands of his enemies, and through fear of men proved false to Do. Schlatter and made common cause with Do. Rubel, neither Rubel nor the rebellious people at Philadelphia would have dared to behave in such an irregular manner, and this banner of independence would not have unfurled itself through the land to the injury of the brethren and of both Lutheran and Reformed congregations. Meanwhile it is for us all, but especially for Do. Schlatter, very distressing that we must inform your Reverences that most of the new ministers are so inconsistent that nov/ for som'e weeks they appear to be in league with Do. Weiss, etc. Pos- sibly the following circumstances have caused this : Do. Wald- schmidt is of an ambitious and avaricious temperament. What the results of these two qualities are is known to your Rever- ences without demonstration ; to which must be added that he has had little of an education, and secured an opportunity to study only after his 20th year. For a long time it was hard to speak with him about Dos. Lischy, Rieger and others, because they took Do. Schlatter's part, who could not or would not admit that wheat and oats might pass as emolu- ments of a minister, since a self-interested minister might change all that he had to expect from his congregations into 102 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. such products, and then might claim 450 guilders from the Holland donations. It also pleases him to look upon the rest of us ^vith contempt, because he also expects a letter from your Reverences, and on this account has taken sides with Dos. Weiss and Leydich, and has bought a piece of land of more than 100 acres. Do. Wissler has also bought a farm, but to our great sorrow, lives on bad terms mth his wife, and is given to habitual drunkenness. Do. Frankenfeld is no less addicted to excessive drinking, so that we are afraid he vnW labor among his congregations with but little blessing if he does not change. AVe hope, and pray to God, ha may change. The last two probably look forAvard to a well-deserved rebuke by the Coetus, and hence have gone over to Dos. Weiss and Leydich in order to escape, since irregularities are approved by them, for Dos. Steiner and Rubel (with whom no conscientious person before this time would associate) are among them the best of brethren. THIRD SESSION. Do. Schlatter, by virtue of the letter addressed to him in the spring by your Reverences and the Rev. Classis of Amster- dam, requested his dismissal from our Coetus, in order to be relieved from service in this country. It is not very difficult for us to predict what will be the consequences of Brother Schlatter's dismissal and departure. Yet we cannot compel him to struggle any longer among us in a work that is re- warded with ingratitude, but can only reluctantly consent to his dismissal; rather we are in duty bound to give him a good testimonial, according to our best knowledge, as to his zeal and faithful service rendered to us and the country, that he may be able to gain his livelihood wherever the Lord may be pleased to send him. Further, Do. Schlatter begs to be relieved in the future from receiving the donations intended for Pennsylvania, although he handed over to the disposition of our Coetus the fl. 2,523, Holland currency, sent by your Reverences to us, to our complete satisfaction, three days after its receipt, in a friendly and brotherly way and in all fidelity, as can be seen from the IMinutes recording this BE COEDS OF 1753. 103 transaction in April last, and which, as was incumbent upon us, were sent over to your Reverences during the month of May. Meanwhile we trust that in time faithful and loyal brethren who seek to maintain your Reverences' instructions and the lawful Coetus established by Do. Schlatter, in the face of so much opposition, may not be ignored henceforth, but the receipt and distribution of moneys be entrusted to them. This, it seems, to us, excepting God's guidance and his converting grace, will be the powerful means of bringing the wavering to repentance, those deserving punishment to tears, the thoughtless to their senses, and the schismatic to peaeefulness, or, if necessary we shall thereby be delivered from them. Do. Schlatter has further communicated to us the above- mentioned letter, from which we learned with astonishment how he was accused before your Reverences so undeservedly (being altogether innocent) by several unfaithful and false ministers behind his back and ours, to the injury of us all, which seemed to us so distressing that we resolved without Do. Schlatter's knowledge to defend him before your Rever- ences, and at the same time to confirm his own defense, which he had already sent to you during the preceding month, and now having been subscribed by us, is again about to be sent to you. Among other things we can not refrain from re- marking that we do not take Do. Schlatter's part merely to please him, or from personal interest. But we are able with a good conscience, and find ourselves even obliged, to bear witness, that Do. Schlatter has conducted himself per- fectly in accordance with your Reverences' intentions, and has made himself liable to none of those accusations whereof he seems to be suspected by your Reverences through the above-mentioned letters : 1. Inasmuch as he has refused to the elder-s neither a voice nor a seat, until your written injunctions had given him occasion to do so; moreover, he has always acted in conjunc- tion wdth us. 2. In no way did he force himself upon the Philadelphia people, but Do. Rubel is the chief cause (as we are perfectly convinced) of the division there, as appears from the various minutes of our Coetus. 104 COETUS OF PENNSYLVANIA. 3. We know of no superintendency, pre-eminence or un- usual superior lordship, wherewith Do. Schlatter should have shown himself among us, or whereof he made himself guilty. 4. Much less has he ever given any evidences of forcing himself upon our Coetus, as stated, as continuous president (Praeses perpetuus). On the contrary, at every meeting he has resigned the presidency of his own accord, but our confi- dence in him has caused him always again to accept the office, the same as Do. Stoy the office of secretary. But at this meeting we could in no way persuade them thereto, and Do. Rieger was chosen president, and Do. Otterbein secretary. In passing permit a brief remark, namely, that this and other accusations have sprung simply from malice, since Do. Stoy has been secretary ( without being accused) as long as Do. Schlatter was president. 5. Do. Schlatter has done with the Bibles exactly as your orders required, which did not reach him till eight months after the Bibles were received. 6. With regard to the collected money of Reiff we pity Brother Schlatter, who must constantly bear the blame of the imprudence committed by Do. Weiss in connection therewith 20 years ago, and is repeatedly slandered and abused as a deceiver, and we know not what else. Further, if your Rev- erences were better acquainted with the circumstances of the country and the irregular conduct of certain ministers, it would certainly commend itself to your Reverences to com- municate the letters intended for private persons to our Coetus, and prevent thereby a harmful use being made of them. We also beg and request you most humbly to send back to us certified copies of the letters, accusing Do. Schlatter and others, from Dos. Leydich, Weiss, Steiner and Rubel. With reference to the elders, we wish as yet for some time to be allowed to have the privilege of holding Coetus witho^ut them, because their presence occasions expenses and some- times even disturbance in the congregations (regarding the pastor's salary), or even a peasant war, inasmuch as ignorant farmers have as much or even more to say than the ministers themselves in these sad times, when church discipline by the very misconduct of certain ministers is set aside. Otherwise it would be no trouble for us to get 30 or 40 elders together EECOBDS OF 1753. 105 to confirm what we have written. Hence we have the bold- ness to warn your Reverences most respectfully that the large number of signers is no warrant that what is written is true, since it frequently happens that many are induced to sub- scribe what they can neither read nor understand. In conclusion, we modestly make known to your Reverences that we are entirely resolved to abide by your orders, and thus also from this time forth shall hold no more Coetus, nor labor towards effecting any general reunion with the oppos- ing brethren, and so forth, unless we shall have special in- structions to do so from your Reverences and the Rev. Classis of Amsterdam, and from them learn what we are to do with the above-mentioned weak or disorderly brethren. We patiently await how we ought and should conduct ourselves in these deplorable circumstances. Jac. Lischy, Minister at York, Kreutz Creek, Bermudian and Codorus. H. W. Stoy, V. D. M. at Tulpehocken. MINUTES OF THE RIVAL COETUS, HELD AT COCALICO, OCTOBER 10-12, 1753. (Hague 74, i. 83.) Very Rev., Learned and Honorable Sirs, mueh beloved Church Fathers of the renowned Synods of North and South Holland: In submission to your Reverences, we, your humble ser- vants, have observed our duty, obediently to convey to your Reverences the minutes of our Coetus held at Cocalico, the lOth, 11th and 12th of October, of this year, and the most submissive answer to your Reverences' most honored Synod- ical letter, which was publicly and plainly read in our assem- bly and taken to heart; not doubting but that altogether tliey will be favorably accepted by your Reverences. After a very edifying sermon on 1 Peter ii. 5, by Do. Weiss, Pres. p. t., our Coetus was opened, when, after invoking the name of God in the several sessions, the following resolutions were adopted: 1. "With regard to the congregation at I'hiladelphia. Al- though Ave observed, from the pledge in Do. Schlatter's own handwriting, that his Reverence had left the congregation at Pliiladelphia free to receive him on his return as their pastor, or not to receive him, nevertheless at our Coetus, in order to remove all offense, and to prevent all disorder in the future, for the promotion of the honor of God, for the up- building of the Church and the restoration of the general peace, it was unanimously resolved that both congregations at Phihulelphia, abis, hitherto s('i)arated froiri ea.ch other, should again unite in the spirit of love, and by the majority of votes choose for their pastor one recommended and ac- cepted by your Reverences, and recognized as a member of our Coetus, outside of which we recognize no other lawful pastor for the congregation at Philadelphia, To this end our presi- dent, a.s well as other brethren, have offered their services, to go down at any time at the desire of the congregation and hold an election. 2. With regard to the congregation at German town. It (106) BECOEBS OF 1753. 107 gave us particular satisfaction in our Coetus to receive both from Do. Conrad Steiner (who has expressed his regret over what took place at Philadelphia) and from his elder, Mr. Paul Geissel, in the name of the congregation at Germantown, their proposal and request to be recommended to your Rev- erences, and to be received as members of our Coetus, and to become subordinate thereto. They also request to have a part in the subsidies, being in great need. After careful deliber- ation we accepted their Christian petition, and deemed it prudent to recognize and accept them henceforth as members of our Coetus, and have a part in the subsidies with the understanding that the congregation at Germantown should be combined with another congregation. For this reason we recommend them most heartily to your Reverences. 3. As regards the 200 guilders, Avhich are said to be in the hands of Do. Schlatter, of the money collected by Reiff, we have resolved in our Coetus that of this, 100 guilders should be given to Germantown, and 100 guilders to Skippack, in accordance with the definite instruction of your Reverences. 4. Upon the petition made by elder Abraham Sayler to our Coetus, in the name of the congregation at Providence (which until the present was regularly served by Do. Leydich every four weeks), whether an arrangement could not be made whereby the congregation there could be supplied every fortnight. Our Coetus has considered it advantageous to supply the congregation at Providence in turn, both by Do. Leydich and by Do. Steiner. In accordance with this ar- rangement divine services will be held every two weeks at Providence. 5. Because the congregation across the Schuylkill * is in the same condition as the church at Providence, therefore Ave have resolved in our Coetus that the congregation across the Schuylkill shall be supplied in like manner as the congrega- tion at Providence. 6. In the judgment of our Coetus, the congregation at White Oaks can be combined with the congregation at Bas- tian Reyer's, and be supplied by Do. AValdschmidt. * This must be East Vincent, in Chester Co., because Coventry, now Brownback's, was scrve