Entered according to Act ot Congress, in the year 18G4, by LINDLEY SPRING, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of tho United States for the Southern District of New York. A LECTURE DKLIVKRED ON THE 4th OF AUGUST, 1SG4 (FAST-DAY), AT TUK COOPER INSTITUTE, NEW YORK. BY LINDLEY SPRING. •* There's none ever feared .That the truth should be heard, But they whom the truth would indict" There is in the land a large class of people, who, be- fore,, the war begun, were busy conspirators against the Union ; they hated the flag ; denounced the Consti- tution, as a league with hell and a covenant with death ; boastfully resisted and practically annulled laws which were passed to give effect to its fundamental condi- tions. Their sickly patriotism could not stand alone — all at once, as at the blast of a trumpet, it sprung up, a prodigy of strength and demonstration. Moved by the novelty of their sensations, stung by remorse for past delinquencies, our model patriots now work wonders ; wrapped in the full drapery of " hate's polluted rag" they strut the tragic stage and spout their part — and spout it well : 1 2 ' : Let mc alone, good Syphax, I'll conceal My thoughts in passion ('tis the surest way), I'll bellow ont for Rome, and for my country — And mouth at Caesar 'till I shake, the Senate ; Your cold hypocrisy's a stale device — A worn-out trick— would'st thou be thought in earnest? Clothe thy feigned zeal in rage, in fire, in fury." These, mainly, clamor for continual war ; at times, they call for peace, but they call in accents which " blab the heart's malice." Their Peace is a fury— she of the dripping sword and blood-dyed raiment. Discord and revenge attend her ; death and destruction mark her progress ; flam- ing villages ; wasted fields ; regions where not a happy human voice is heard, where nothing is, but la- mentation and mourning, woe and bitterness, or the silence of the grave — these are her consolation. She is wedded to perpetual hate ; the spoils of subjugation and captivity are her dowry, and carnage is her bridal feast. Such is the Peace they invoke. We do not pretend to any extravagant ardor of self- devotion at the altar of our country, much less to this newly hatched, but full-fledged, loyalt}', which, like a brood of greedy chickens, goes cheeping around the public crib. Sincere and affectionate regard for the land of our birth, our ancestors, and our graves, for the civil insti- tutions which have secured so many and so great bene- fits, is natural, nay more, it is inevitable. The same spirit, blended with a sense of pride and exultation, we may fairly be supposed to cherish toward the whole country, its affecting history and traditions, its great achievements, its beneficent institutions, its venerable names. In this connection we can not 'but remember, that the people against whom we now wage a war of almost unmitigated ferocity, have peculiar claims on our for- QUA*? bcarancc and consideration ; that they are our breth- ren, the descendants of those very men who, in closest fellowship with our ancestors, wrote the history of this nation with their swords, sealed our political redemp- tion with their blood ; whose wisdom, self-devotion, sufferings, and courage secured our liberties and estab- lished this great nation. But for them, where would have been our country? Where, this very day, our power to wage a merciless crusade against their children ? Even now we call them " fathers," and do not blush. According to such old-fashioned notions as these, we claim to love our country ; but we respectfully decline all title to that raging patriotism which, like the cur- rency of the day, carries all its security on its face, pays only in promises, and is chiefly used to gull the people. The Peace we. invoke is a very different character from that which has just been described. Our Peace is a heaven-born, heaven descended Grace; her countenance is beautiful as the morning ; her rai- ment is white as the snow ; she carries the olive branch in her hand ; and the dove flies securely to her breast; Faith, Hope, and Charity are her handmaids; unity and concord, life, light, and prosperity attend her steps 4 along her path the wilderness blossoms as the rose, and the waste places smile ; cities rise up to do her reverence, and the ripe fields bow their heads ; the land is full of pl< nty ; wisdom exalteth the nation ; all the people rejoice and shout together : " Glory to God in the highest, peace on earth and good-will to- ward men." Solomon says, * It is an honor for, a man to cease from strife, but every fool will be meddling." The professed object of tins war is, to restore the Union. If the means employed obviously defeat the end, the 4 reason for employing them ceases, and the means ought to cease. The case is too sad for mif th, or we might venture to be a little mirthful over the absurdity, of an at- tempt to secure a union of equals, of freemen, friends — a union of consent and self-government — by force ; especially when that force is so exerted as to ex- tinguish every sentiment necessary to such a condi- tion, and provoke those which are repugnant to its existence. A union of force and free-will constitutes a hybrid, which, if not sterile, can breed monsters only. The war has been going on for more than three years, and every intelligent, candid observer of events feels that it has utterly failed of any substantial re- sults tending to a restoration of the Union ; feels that restoration to be a great deal farther off to-day than it was the day the first fleet lay off Charleston harbor, the day the first hostile foot pressed the soil of Vir- ginia. Maryland, conquered before she had time to rise, lies a captive bound ; the form of union is there — an abject, mutilated, disfigured form indeed, but the soul has fled. Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, large por- tions of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Virginia have been "restored" — say, rather, desolated, converted into hos- tile camps ; but is there union ? Have you made friends or enemies ? Such questions mock us ; laugh at our folly, and deride our expectations. Even while we speak, over those western fields the terrible conflict is renewed; the subjugated have risen. Again the whirlwind sweeps northward, its thunder shakes the Capitol. And what does it prove ? It proves that, to the freemen of these United States, there is no middle ground bejtween Liberty and Death. The real object of the war is not the restoration of 5 the Union ; but the abolition of slavery, the overthrow of State rights, and the creation of a military govern- ment. We are becoming more and more familiar with the conditions of the contest ; one by one, all flimsy pre- texts are thrust aside, and the original, unchanged, logical purpose stands disclosed in all its ghastly features of submission or extermination. Submission we have made impossible, except on terms that no freeman should ever have proposed, and no freeman can ever accept. To make subjects, slaves, dependents on our bounty for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, of whole communities, a race of people, our equals and former fellow-citizens, were in us, not political murder mere- ly, but political suicide. We have no fear that it can be done. What then ? Extermination ? Do they know, those who use this word so glibly, the meaning of it ? Have they fathomed its depths ? Explored its horrors ? Made an estimate of its diffi- culties ? Nay, mure, thank God, of its impossibilities ? This is not the Dark Ages, nor are these a little, feeble, unarmed band of fugitives of the Apennines; but eight millions of free people — a people accustomed to liberty and the use of arms, courageous, and war- like. They inhabit a territory of more than a million and a half of square miles ; a vast region every way defensible by nature and art. They have the best of military leaders, all the appliances, arms, and muni- tions of war; and are inspired by every sentiment cal- culated to stimulate their zeal and invigorate their resistance. They can not be subjugated. Shall history teach us nothing l { Philip of Spain, the mightiest monarch of his age, with all his power, was unable to subdue the Nether- lands. There were — high military genius, unlimited, resources in men and money, veteran armies, a fierce 6 courage, bitter religious hatred, against a handful of people, a petty country, a mere plain without forests or mountain defenses ; hut that handful of people was superior to all the powers of despotism ; for it was sustained by stout hearts, a united purpose, an indomi- table will, the resolution to be free or die! Against such defenses those proud armies dashed themselves in vain, even as the waters of the German Ocean dash against the dikes of Holland. The cruel struggle lasted many years ; it was conducted much after the present fashion ; but those rebels maintained fheir liberty, and, in due time, Spain herself was made to feel the invader's wasting sword. Fifty years ago, Poland, unhappy Poland, was stricken down, and divided as a spoil to her con- querors; yet Poland, weltering in blood, struggles on, and, but yesterday, threatened to involve all Europe iu her cause. Greece saw her cities burned, her fields laid waste, her people slaughtered, her youth sold into captivity, her virgins made the inmates of some Turkish harem; yet Greece survives, and her cruel master owes his existence to the jealousy of rival nations, and not to his own strength. The thirteen colonies threw off the yoke of Great Britain. It was another 'mighty nation against another handful of people. There was no great oppression; but our fathers resolved to be free, to render their children free, and free they became. The consideration of this subject calls to mind cases simil.ir, almost innumerable. The most affecting, in- structive, and ennobling pages of history are those which narrate their story. But, Suppose we succeed in our project, what shall we gain ? We shall gain a desolated South. We .shall gain a race of freed blacks ; which, ac- 7 .cording to all experience, soon returns to its condition of native barbarism, whenever able to cimsult its in- clinations. We shall gain a still greater national debt, which must be either repudiated to the rflin of thousands, or sustained by a system of the most oppressive tax- ation. We shall gain a distracted country, a subverted government, a great standing arm}', and a master. We shall gain an inheritance of hatred, revenge, and perpetual enmity ; the reproach and contempt of the civilized world. What shall we lose ? We shall lose our most profitable neighbors and best ^customers — our natural friends and allies ; we shall luse years upon years of prosperous industry and intercourse ; we shall lose our own self-respect, and the respect of mankind ; and we shall lose our liberties. In the language of one of the placards of the times, Will it pay That the real object of the war is the destruction of slavery many deny in terms, but affirm in effect, by saving that slavery is the cause of the war. and that there can be n > peace until it is abolished. Such an argument as this would justify David for putting Uriah in the front of the battle, that he might peaceably enjoy Bathsheba ; or Ahab, for compassing the deatn of Naboth, that he might possess his J vine- yard in quiet. It was the reasoning of the wolf at the brook : the lamb muddied the water, therefore he devoured it. It is a highwayman's plea, and would justify him in taking that gold which was the cause of temptation, violence, and crime. It is the flimsy excuse of covctonsncss, jealousy, and intermeddling. 8 Slavery does not meddle with us, but we meddle with it. Naboth did not meddle with Ahab ; but Ahab med- dled with Naboth, for he coveted his vineyard, the inheritance of his fathers, to have it for a garden. The illegality and injustice of a war for the abolition of slavery in this country has been often and fully dis- cussed, the points are few, plain, conclusive, and familiar. The argument may be considered closed ; we do not propose, at this time, to open it. To those who seek an apology for supporting the war, in the condition of things it has produced ; we answer : That which in the beginning was wrong, no results proceeding therefrom, no length of time, can make right. To those actuated by antipathies of race and the jealousies of labor, nothing more need be said than that such motives confess the crime. 9 Those who are moved by philanthropic considera- tions, if any such there can be, had better direct their attention to some quarter where they would be more highly appreciated, or more necessary ; where there would not be such a glaring violation of plighted faith, the obligations of good fellarwship and good neighbor- hood ; and where their experiments would be attended with less disastrous consequences. ' There is Africa, for instance, probably worse off to- day than ever she was ; no very disastrous consequences would be likely to attend an amiable crusade in that direction, except to the crusaders. Or Great Britain ; she has no special claims on our gratitude, or good faith, or good fellowship. There are to-day millions of her subjects, in mines, factories, and workshops, held to a perpetual slavery worse a great deal than that of this country. There is Siberia, too, among the exiles. Doubtless 9 our illustrious Russian ally would highly appreciate and reward any benevolent designs in that^irection. Or, if our philanthropists must be doing, andwill rest satis- fied with the tame excitement of hunting on their own grounds, they can find, all around them, lying in their own grease, an unctuous collection of freed negroes, who, under the bland influences of liberty, are fast dy- ing out ; unless soon caught, there will be nothing left of them to catch, except the scrofula. The cost of the war is a reason why it should cease. The consumption of human life is enormous, whole armies have been slaughtered in the field, or sent to the hospitals to die ; there are hundreds of thousands maimed for life, or incurably diseased. And how shall we count the childless, the widows, the orphans, and those otherwise left destitute ? We can obtain nothing which will compensate for such losses and bereave- ments as these. The cost in other respects is ruinous. The money, labor, and produce of the whole country, parted with for a paper consideration, to be consumed, fired away in powder and shot. Thus, while destroying the substance of the South, we waste our own — burn the candle at both ends. Surely never were people so busy in the work of self- destruction, nor so mad. Our mode of warfare is unchristian, inexcusable, dis- graceful, and furnishes a very strong reason why the war should cease. We have fought their armies with all our might — we have attacked and taken their fortified and defended places. This is, at any rate, manly ; it is war. We have declared contraband all the munitions and material of war, and all supplies destined for their armies and strongholds. This, too, is war ; but much have we done which is not war, but barbarism. We have declared contraband the subsistence of the 1* 10 whole people, armed and unarmed, combatants and non-combatanjp, young and old, male and female ; and all medicines, even chloroform, the gift of humanity to man's misery, and salt, so indispensable to every family. Yes, some of the greatest conquests of the war have been over this highly explosive material. Doubtless, the water of the running brooks, the rain, the light and the air of Heaven would be declared con- traband, if there were not some doubts of the efficacy of the embargo. Nor is this all ; we have done much more and much worse. We have made war upon the whole people without discrimination, and against their property of every description. We have destroyed their landmarks, their public records, deeds and other evidences of property. We have cut down their fruit trees and trees of shade and ornament about their dwellings, destroyed their gardens, fences^ and growing crops ; their machinery and implements of agriculture. What could be taken away has been taken away, even to the milch cow for the family and the horse for the mill. We have spoiled them of their wearing apparel and jevels, of the furniture of their houses, of their family plate and pictures ; even of that sacred fund which the mother hoards in secret for pious uses, of their pub- lic libraries, their works of art and science. We have carried indiscriminately, fire, famine, plun- der, and destruction over a great extent of their country. We have burned their defenseless and undefended towns, villages, and isolated dwellings, driving the terror-stricken and impoverished inhabitants to the woods and fields for shelter. Nor have we spared those asylums for the insane, the deaf, the dumb, the blind, which even savages hold sacred. We have violated and destroyed their churches and II their graves — done all iii our power to expose their helpless families to the worst horrors of a servile insur- reetion. We have made war on women, taken them prisoners, treated them brutally, held them as hostages for negro raiders, under threats of ignominious death. We directed the surprise of -their capital city, «*not for occupation, but to have it destroyed, by fire of the incendiary, its unarmed people abandoned to the tender mercies of a fierce soldiery, and their rulers slain. We seduce slaves to take up arms against their mas- ters, under delusive promises of a freedom which they can never enjoy ; those whom vvc can not seduce we compel and restrain — these soldiers, if such they should be called, we thrust into the field or the fort, subject to more than the ordinary perils of war — knowing full well, that, of necessity and by the law of nations, the Southern people can not regard such soldiers as ordi- nary prisoners of war. We know, top, that such sol- diers, when not cowards, are as wild beasts, ignorant of civilized warfare, au4, we also know that this tends to aggravate the horrors of the war out of all proportion to any benefit that can be expected from it. These things we have done, to the degradation of the profession of arms, without necessity, for we are twenty millions of free white people against our adver- sary's eight millions. We receive constant accessions by foreign emigration ; they do not. We pause over this enumeration of particulars with horror and shame ; no wonder the people of France call us monsters. Is this the nineteenth century — and this the boasted and boastful republic of America, the home 'of civiliza- tion, religion, and humanity ? Is the world upon, its backward march, and do these vandals of the North lead the way ? 12 If such uses as these are justifiable, then is the use of poison justifiable, or any other infamous means re- sorted to in the worst of times, by the worst of people, to supply the deficiencies of incapacity or cowardice. They are in themselves a confession of weakness ; a confession of our inability to wage this war to success, except by means of treacherous apts, which derive no authority from virtue, or courage, or superior numbers ; and against which, neither virtue, courage, nor superior numbers can always be secure. They are means which civilized society everywhere denounces, as it denounces the assassin and the pirate ; they are every way detestable, and without excuse. What said the astonished Camillus, to the schoolmas- ter who would betray the children of the Falerians into his hands ? "Neither the people, nor the commander to whom thou hast come, thou wretch, with thy villainous offer, are like thyself. War, indeed, is, of necessity, attended with much injustice and violence ; but war has its laws as well as peace, which all good men observe ; nor is victory so great an object with us as to induce us to incur, for its sake, obligations for base and im- pious acts. A great general should rely on his own virtues, and not on other men's vices. " We carry arms, not against persons of such age as these, who, even in the storming of towns, are ex- empted from injury ; but against men, who have arms in their hands as well as ourselves, those thou hast conquered, as far as in thee lay, by an act of unex- ampled villainy, I shall conquer them as I conquered Veii, by Roman methods, by valor, by labor, and by arms." Saying this, he ordered rods to be put in the hands of the children, the man to be stripped and scourged back to the city. In the war between Caesar and Pompey, the latter 13 made proclamation, that all who did not join him should be treated as enemies. Coesar, on the contrary, proclaimed that all who did not join the enemy should be treated as friends. Which was the better or the wiser man was shown by the result. Abbe de Marolles, in his memoirs of Henry IV. of France, says : " No march of his soldiers ever pillaged a single village, much less desolated whole provinces." When Bardolph was hanged for stealing a Pyx, of little price, King Henry V. said : "We would have all such offenders cut off, and we give express charge, that, in our marches through the country, there be nothing compeljed from the villages, nothing taken but paid for ; none of the French up- braided or abused in disdainful language. For where lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentler gamester is the soonest winner." What has been the result of our mode of warfare? Traverse that land and see. Wherever our armies or our predatory hordes have gone, there is wide-spread desolation, and misery, and hate ; nothing relieves the terrible monotony of the picture, save the patience, the endurance, the fortitude, of its people, their high courage and fixed resolve to perish rather than endure the loathed embraces of those who have inflicted such in- juries and sufferings upon them. But we have not finished, would that we had. When, as conquerors, wo have entered and possessed a city, one would suppose that a people so abounding in the highest qualities of manhood would respect the misfortunes of an adversary whom war had placed in their power. An adversary, whose cause we may feel bound to condemn ; but whose courage, self-devotion, and fortitude in defending that cause we* should surely respect. 14 In such a case, all wanton signs of triumph are, of course, suppressed; there is an exercise of magnanimity, moderation, forbearance ; every available means of conciliation are resorted to, in order that we might have a speedy return to that state of harmony so essen- tial to the " restoration" we profess to desire. Prudence, if not manliness, dictates such a course. Neither the dictates of manliness nor of prudence have been followed. The insolence of triumph has characterized our con- quests, and unmitigated oppression darkened every day of our dominion. The occupation of New Orleans, for instance, will furnish volumes of infamy. . It appears to have been the design of the authorities so to govern that city as to goad the people to madness, and furnish pretexts for general confiscation and exile. A brutal despotism prevailed there, with unlimited plunder, and prodigal, shameless living. Nothing was omitted to insult and degrade, pillage and distress, which the ingenuity of little minds, coarse, cruel, vulgar natures, and bad hearts could suggest. The surrender stipulated for the protection of private persons and property. And yet the people were impover- ished by forced loans, military exactions, fines, forfeit- ures, and downright robbery. They were forbidden to earn a living, except on terms repugnant to conscience and feeling. They were placed at the mercy of spies, eves-droppers, and informers ; the man was mad<3 to betray his master, and the maid her mistress. Families of inoffensive, helpless people, forbidden to take anything away but the clothes they wore, were turned out of comfortable homes in order that some low official and his trull might be installed there. Severe, degrading, and infamous punishments ; a military dungeon, imprisonment at hard labor, with ball 15 and chain, a beggared exile, was the sentence of many hundreds of the best citizens, for the expression of an opinion, for contumacy and contempt in refusing to ex- press an opinion, lor the attractions of a bribe or a confiscation. There was no defense against caprice, or vulgarity, or cupidiiy, or malignity, or the petty exercise of power, or against any sort of vileness, unless it was money. Innocence was no security, nor weakness, nor sex, nor age, nor dclicac'y,«or virtue; nothing except poverty. In short, the rule was worthy of its hero; but that we, who are so sensitive to the opinions of mankind, should loudly proclaim of that man : " Well done, thou good and faithful servant," and should confer upon him the laurels of a victor, is singular, if it is not shameful. . As with New Orleans, so, in proportion to its size.* and wealth, has it been with Norfolk, and other cities. It is a painful and blasting record, not one-tenth part- of which can be disclosed now. The rule of the civilized world toward a subjugated people is, that, so long as they demean themselves peaceably, the}' shall be, not only undisturbed, but pro- tected. We adopt a different plan. To live peaceably, to be law abiding, to fulfdl all the duties of a citizen, are no security to those who will not say what they do not mean, nor swear what they can not intend. Is this union, or the way to restore it, or is any such union worth having? To all of these things, guilty actors and sordid flat- terers answer : "These are rebels, and rebels have no rights; no, not to wife, nor child, nor possessions, nor life, nor anything. Neither have wife, nor child, nor kindred, any rights." Such is the language of Omnipotence, or of blasphe- my ! Are ye God, or do ye stand in the place of God ? Is it by you these " rebels" live and move and have their being ? Is it your breath they draw, your buu 16 they enjoy ? Does your rain water the earth, and were the green fields spread by you ? Is it by your strength they toil and gather substance, ye pensioners on the bounty of an hour ? Rebels have no rights to anything derived from those against whom they wrongfully rebel; further than this, your proposition has no right to go. Everywhere, in all ages, the language of tyranny and its sycophants has been the same. The Parliamen- tary debates of England, during our Revolutionary War, would furnish suggestive reading for the present day; for then, as now, there were those who said that " rebels, had no rights." We will quote a paragraph from a speech of John Wilkes, in 1775 : 11 Whether their present state is that of rebellion or \)f a fit and just resistance to unlawful acts of power, resistance to our attempts to rob them of their property and liberties, as they imagine, I shall not declare ; this I know, a successful resistance is a revolution. Rebel- lion, indeed, appears on the back of a flying enemy, but revolution flames on the breastplate of the victorious warrior." Of all the people in the world, we should be the last to say, that rebels have no rights — for shame ! Cease trampling on the graves of your ancestors and my ancestors! Cease to revile those sacred memories, to cast contempt on our most venerable traditions. Rebellion ! Rebels ! Memorable words 1 All over the world, in every tongue, tyrants know them well and fear them greatly. They have pulled down many a haughty throne; stricken the fetters from many a mis- erable captive; and done more to establish truth and right, and good government, to deliver mankind from every sort of darkness, misrule, and oppression, than all the principalities, powers, and dominions since the Deluge. The next suggestion is addressed to your resentment, 17 vexation, and pride ; it is an artful suggestion : " What right have these people to break up the best govern- ment that ever existed ? Suppose it to be true that they have broken up the best government that ever existed, does that create any right in us to treat tbem as wild beasts ; to seek their extermination ; to wipe out in blood and smoke a civilized, Christianiaw^people ? No ; never. Nature revolts at sucli horrible pretensions, and Nature's God will never bless them. But let us consider this proposition a little. Because this is the best government that ever existed for the North, does it follow that it is best for the South ? And who are the proper judges, we, or they ? Because it is the best for us, have we a right to impose it on those for whom it is not the best? If so, what becomes of. the right to resist any degree of oppression and tyran- ny, of the right to rebel in any case ? What becomes of our boasted liberties, of our right of self-government, of our Declaration of Independence ? The greatest .despot that ever lived might say the same thing of his rebellious subjects, and with truth, for it might well be the best government in the world for him. Was it ever before known, heard, or read of, that a community of eight millions of people, or the half of that number, with almost perfect unanimity, persisted in rejecting "the best government that ever existed," choosing t"> encounter every peril and privation rather than submit any longer to it ? The suggestion is too wild and irrational to deserve a thought. Is that " the best government" which can not, or does not, keep the peace between its members; where there is perpetual wrangling, dispute, and danger of open violence ? Can that be the best government where one portion of the people perseveres, offensively and injuriously, in 18 meddling" with the affairs of the other portion, and insists on the whole being governed to suit its own interest and prejudices, regardless of others ? Can two walk together except they be agreed ? It is the struggle of selfishness which has agitated the wor d from the beginning, old as right and wrong, oppression and resistance, old as the universal appetite which provokes the strong to devour the weak. During our Revolutionary War, the armies of Great Britain ■ occupied nearly all of our capital cities, from one to five years, they were quartered in many of our peaceful inland towns, and passed through a large ex- tent of our country. Suppose that, because " Rebels had no rights,'- and because they had broken up " the best government that ever existed," Great Britain had made as merciless a use of her strength as we have made of ours, where and what would have been Boston, Providence, Hartford, New Haven, New York, Newark, Princeton, Philadel- phia, liarrisburg ? Where, and what the principal ' towns and villages of all these States? In what con- dition would they have left this land, these homes, and the heart* of the people. There were not wanting advocates for such a course. Turn to the sehool books, and read an extract or two from the Earl of Chatham's speeeh against employing Indians in the watN "It is perfectly justifiable, says a noble lord, to use all the means that God and nature put into our hands. I am astonished, shocked, to hear such principles con- fessed, to hear them avowed in this House, or even in this country ; principles equally unconstitutional, in- human, and unchristian. " As members of this House, as men, as Christians, ' we are called upon to 'protest against the barbarous proposition. " What ideas that noble lord may have of God and 19 nature, I know not; but I know that such abominable principles are equally abhorrent to religion and hu- • inanity. "Turn forth into our settlements, among our ancient connections, friends, and relations, the merciless canni- bal, thirsting for the blood of man, woman, and child ! Send forth the infidel savage ! Against whom ? Against your* Protestant brethren, to lay waste their country, to desolate their dwellings, and extirpate their race and name, with these horrible hell-hounds of savage war 1" Again, in another speech he says : " If illegal violences have been, as it is said, com- mitted in America, prepare the way — open the door of possibility — for acknowledgment and satisfaction; but, proceed not to such coercion, such proscription ; cease your indiscriminate inflictions; amerce not thirty thousand ; oppress not three millions ; irritate them not to unappeasable rancor for the fault of forty or fifty. Such severity of injustice must forever render incur- able the wounds you have inflicted. What though you march from ^own to town, from province to province? What though you enforce a local and temporaiw sub- mission, how sha 1 you secure the obedience of the country you leave behind yon: in your progress ? How grasp the dominion of eighteen hundred miles of conti- nent, populous in number, strong in valor, liberty, and the means of resistance V Again, John Wilkes : " I call the war with our breth- ren in America an unjust and felonious war, because the primary cause and confessed origin of it is, to at- tempt to take their money (slaves) from them without their consent, contrary to the common rights of all man- kind, and those great fundamental principles of the English Constitution, for which Hampden bled. I as- sert, Sir, that it is a murderous war, because it is an effort to deprive men of their lives for standing up in defense of their property and their clear rights. Such 20 ,& war, I fear, Sir, will draw down the vengeance of Heaven on this devoted kingdom." A few years ago, the speeches from which these ex- tracts have been taken were familiar to every school- boy, the sentiments they expressed received our hearty assent and admiration. It is no longer so. Many will deny that there is any parallel between our Revolutionary War and the present war. . They are parallel, as far as you have any right to carry the comparison. They are parallel much further than is necessary to secure your conviction. The thirteen colonies formed a very important part of the British Empire, their inhabitants were British subjects, and the right of that Government ^to attempt their conquest and subjugation was, at least, in a po- litical sense, every way superior to any right we have to attempt the conquest and subjugation of the people of the South. They are not our subjects, never were, and, we trust, never will be. We shall not attempt to carry the parallel to the rights and wrongs of the respective parties, nor to their several modes of warfare. There, indeed,' all compari- son is deGed by the extravagant proportions of the present case. <* But there is method in this madness. The party which controls the nation and manages the war does not intend to have a restoration of the Union. Their projects_aim at empire — some kind of strong govern- ment is to be formed in which the people are to have about as much share as the figures in a puppet show. The precise shape of that government will depend on circumstances, but the plot is certainly in existence, and working. The return of the South, as equals, would defeat it ; as subjects or dependencies, would promote it ; therefore, subjugation or extermination are resorted to. The people of the South must be driven to extremi- ties, forced into perpetual exile, or killed, or otherwise 21 ground so fine as to be impalpable. Their places and possessions are to be occupied by what are called, " the sons of freedom," a lank, hairy" hungry race — livid importations from New England. They may be called army vultures, who do very little of the fighting, but for whom almost all of the fighting is done ; they are cun- ning dealers in famil} r plate, pictures, jewels, libraries, household furniture, pianos, petticoats, and such like contraband of war. These are to constitute the South- ern aristocracy. The serfs are already provided; four millions of stout, acclimated blacks, who have already been informed that, white the tenure of their service is changed, their obligation u to serve is not changed, n in other words, that they have only changed masters. Should this nice little extermination plan fail, our imperialists fall back on the next best thing Between the Njyrth and the South they have opened a gulf of hatred, loathing, and contempt, which can not be passed. They will take good care that it never is filled up. Thus the unity of the North is to be enforc- ed. Liberty disappears before the march of military power, the persuasive influence of a national currency, a national banking system, a national debt, national bonds, national imposts and taxes, national everything, is to complete our subjugation. New England, through her representation in the Senate, is to continue, as now, master of the situation. Her manufactures, her merchants, and her ships increase and multiply, the war goes bravely on, till Yankee am- bition, avarice, hatred, and fanaticism have free course and are glorified. All this, be it remembered, in the name of the Lord, in behalf of Liberty, Union, the Constitution, and the Laws. Another plea for peace is found in the demoralizing influence of the war upon society. It distracts and divides families ; it separates very friends. It makes people rogues, cheats, and liars. It 22 casts a blight on Christian character, and opposes Christian influence. It deadens the amiable sensibili- ties, quickens every evil passion, encourages the most barbarous sentiments. Three short years ago, who would have believed that the refined, delicate, and tender-hearted women cf this land could be so transformed as to exult over the hor- rors of this war, and the success of its vilest measures; or that, heretofore, worthy and pious men, elders and deacons of churches, and even clergymen, should ap- prove, advocate, exhort, a war of extermination against a people of the same race, liberties, civilization, ami re- ligion, including a vast number of Christian brethren and ministers. Or, that citizens of New York, most of them, in pri. vate life, humane, upright, good men, could volunteer public honors to the despot of New Orleans ; one who returned from the scene of his indefatigable exploits loaded with plunder, infamy, and the execrations of an oppressed and ruined people ; a being of whom it may be said, without exaggeration, that out of his own coun- try there is no portion of the civilized globe where his presence would be tolerated ; no, not even in Russia. Or, that there could be found anywhere among us, even in New England, ministers of the Gospel, feeding their flo*cks (by night), who would dare to point to their well -filled shelves, as spoils of war from the libra- ries of ministerial brethren of the South, and to the wearing apparel and adornments of their wives and daughters, as contraband, godly confiscations of ward- robes belonging to ladies of the South. " Woe to thee that spoilest, and thou wast not spoiled; and dealest treacherously, and they dealt not treacher- ously with thee. " When thou shalt cease to spoil, thou shalt be spoiled; and when thou shalt make an end to deal treacherously, they shall deal treacherously with thee." 23 We make great pretensions to the manly qualities — among these, magnanimity and a generous courage stand pre-eminent. The honor of nations, the peculiar glory of heroes ; they soften the rigors of war, and, more invincible than arms, consummate its victories. How is it that now we find neither time, space, nor occasion for -the practice of these virtues ? The prevailing temper of the public mind is ungener- ous and revengeful, fierce, bloody, and implacable. We triumph with bitter and unbecoming exultation, alike over victories on the field of battle against armed men, and victories of desolation over the unarmed and- defenseless. Our joy is dashed by no touch of pity, remorse, or regret. Flags innumerable stream from window, tower, and steeple; there are bonfires, illumi- " nations, fireworks ; the people throng the churches, .mingle the blood of brethren with their sacrifice, and give God thanks in a spirit better suited to the halls of Odin than to a temple of the Lord Jesus Christ. Until Cassar's time, Rome refused to triumph in her civil wars. She thought them occasions for grief, rather than occasions for rejoicing? Caesar's triumph was one of the causes of his downfalL When Israel had overcome Benjamin, " the people came to the house of God, and abode there until even, before God, and wept sore, and said: " Lord God of Israel, why is 4his come to pass in Israel, that there should be to-day one tribe lacking in Israel." It is sad to reflect that this condition of the public mind has derived its chief food and stimulus from, the great body of the Protestant clergy of this land. That from their precept and behavior it receives counte- nance, encouragement, and support. From the very beginning none have been more prompt to enter the political arena — " cry havoc, and %i slip the dogs of war none have followed up the 24 war with more eagerness and constancy ; none have attended the Administration with more obsequious steps, nor yielded heartier approbation and support to its most extreme and questionable measures ; lending to it and to them all the influence of their sacred character and functions. Noue have done more to call forth the worst passions which this war has gendered, and none have done so much to consecrate them. The war has no better friends, and peace, sweet peace, no worse enemies than they. 1 We approach this subject with great reluctance, but we can not avoid it. It stands in our path ; confronts us at every turn, with menacing aspect and determination. How can we hope to reach the heart or the judg- ment, when man points to those who absolve him for the neglect or the abuse of both ? How hope to draw the worldling to that wisdom whose ways are pleasant- ness, and her paths peace, when his spiritual adviser pulls him back ? What better excuse does society need, for the in- dulgence of plausible errors and vices, than the ex- ample and precepts*of those who speak in God's name, and assume to declare his will. Reverend fathers and brethren, we address you in sorrow rather than in anger. Ye know not what ye do. Ye have allowed yourselves to be committed to this bloody business* by a vociferous patriotism, which is no patriotism at all, but rank treachery to country and to laws — a patriotism which is all impiety, selfish-, ness, and infidelity. ^ If this were a war of self-defense, your relations to it and to society would be very different from what they are ; but it is not. It is a war of aggression ; » a «war of fanaticism, hatred, and revenge ; a war of covetousness and ambition ; a war of conquest and subjugation ; a war for government and empire. It is an unrighteous war, for an unrighteous purpose, 25 waged in an unrighteous and savage manner. You can not support it without being partakers of its guilt — accomplices in all its crimes. Are men so lamblike, so patient and long-suffering, so full of love, so averse to all violence, that even from the sanctuary they must be harangued, aroused, ex- cited, and dismissed to deeds of slaughter ? Angels and ministers of grace, defend us I You have a commission to preach peace and good- will. You have no commission to preach war. What have you to do with the rude contentions of men, but to assuage them ? Your Master's kingdom is not of this world. When you mingle in its strifes, you oppose his authority and example. When you employ your holy office in such a busi- ness, you dishonor both it and Him in whose name you assume to stand. Put up thy sword ; it suits not with the cross. We have listened with pained hearts as you dictate, now to God, and then to your congregation, in behalf of this " holy war," and against this " accursed rebel- lion" — these wicked rebels, " the sons of Belial." " God is the God of battles," therefore, say you, it is our right and duty to invoke his blessing on this war and on all its measures. And it has been well attested to us, that one of you, more blasphemous than his fellows, after reading to his congregation the curses of David, closed the book with this remark : M If he did not believe that these prophe- cies were intended for the South, he would not accept the Bible as God's Word." Is such language and behavior calculated to allay the general heat, or to aggravate it ; to subdue the pas. sions, or to stimulate them ? Is such the sort of food on which you fatten the lambs of your flock for Heaven ? Happy lambs! 2 26 God is the God of battles I Where do you find this written ? Not in the Bible. But throughout that sacred book it is proclaimed, in repeated and rejoic- ing numbers, that He is the God of peace .and recon- ciliation. Why do ye deify war ? And why do ye per- vert the Scriptures ? God is the God of battles, not in any special sense, but as he is the God of everything — even of hell. But because God is the God of battles, does it follow that it is our right and duty to invoke his blessing on the war and on all its measures ? What chop logic is this ? If the war is a righteous war, and the measures taken for its prosecution are righteous measures, we have a right to invoke and expect his blessing on them both ; therefore, It is our duty to take our cause before God, seek his counsel and direction ; ask him to bless, defend, and prosper the right. We are not to put words into the mouth of the Al- mighty ; not to prejudge our cau"se, enter judgment in our own favor ; come into his presence with a copy of the decree, and demand a writ of execution. In a general sense, then, God is the God of battles and of war, therefore he is. the judge of both ; sooner or later he will judge those, who, for years, have plot- ted and labored night and day to foment discord among brethren, and bring about the present evil times. " This Holy War I" " From whence come wars and fightings amongst you ? Come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members." " Accursed rebellion 1" " Wicked rebels I* " Sons of Belial !" What right have you, speaking in Christ's name, to employ such rude language as this ? All wickedness is the violation of God's law. He it is, and not man, who declares wherein such violation consists. Where in the Bible is there a definition of 27 these terms, or an illustration, or a precept, which au- thorizes the use of them in fanning the fires of an accursed strife? Is it found in the language of Abraham to Lot : " Let there be no strife, I pray thee, between me and thee, and between my herdmen aud thy herdmeu, for we be brethren. Separate thyself, I pray thee, from me. If thou wilt take the left hand, then I will go to the right ; or, if thou depart to the right hand, then I will go to the left r Is it found in the narrative of that rebellion in which Lot was engaged when taken captive and rescued by Abraham ; who slew his captors, and thereupon re- ceived the blessing of Melchisedek, the priest of the Most High God ? Or in the repeated rebellions of the Israelites against the Egyptians, the Canaanites, the Midianites, and others ? Or in that celebrated revolt of the ten tribes ? The uarrative of that revolt deserves your special notice. If political preachers were so inclined, what a sermon could be written upon it, and what parallels drawn ! The ten tribes, excepting a remnant gathered in Je- rusalem, were agriculturists. During Solomon's luxu- rious aud expensive reign, they had suffered from severe taxation and other burdens ; for then, as now, labor had to support capital. On the accession of "Rehoboam to the throne, they came to him, saying : " Thy father made our yoke grievous ; now, therefore, ease thou somewhat the grievous servitude of thy father and his heavy yoke that he put upon us, and we will serve thee. "And Rehoboam consulted with the old men that had stood before Solomon, his father, and they counseled him, saying : " U thou wilt be a servant unto this people, and wilt 28 serve them, and answer them, and speak good words to them, then they will be thy servants forever." But he forsook the counsel of the old men, and con- sulted with the young men that were grown up with him, men of his own party, and according to their coun- sel he answered the people roughly ; denied them all redress, and threatened still greater burdens, saying : " My little finger shall be thicker than my father's loins." When all Israel saw that the king hearkened not unto them, they said : "What portion have we in David? Neither have we inheritance in the son of Jesse. To your tents, Israel \» So Israel rebelled against the house of David unto this day. But Rehoboam was not disposed to abandon his gov- ernment over Israel, for we find that he sent to them a tax collector, Adoram, who was over the tribute, and they killed him ; and it appears that they did not even respect the person of the king, for we read that Reho- boam made speed to get him up to his chariot, to flee to Jerusalem. What had occurred " fired the heart" of the king, and confirmed his resolution to bring back the tribes which had seceded from him ; for he straightway gathered a mighty army, one hundred and eighty thousand chosen men, which were warriors, to fight against the house of Israel, to bring the kingdom again to Rehoboam. But the word of God came to Shemaiah, the man of God, saying : " Speak unto Rehoboam, the son of Solomon, King of Judah, and unto all the house of Judah and Benjamin, and to the remnant of the people, saying : " Thus saith the Lord : Ye shall not go up, nor fight against your brethren, the children of Israel, for this thing is from me." 29 Can you find any authority for your behavior in the sermon on the mount, or elsewhere, in the New Testa- ment ? Where ? Whatever were the merits of this war at the begin- ning whatever were then its objects or pretended ob- jects ; whatever question there then was of its right- eousness ; it lias, since then, been put beyond question, and, so far as one of the parties to it is concerned, be- yond merit. On our part it has become a war of extermination. On the part of our adversaries it has become a war for their lives, their families, their homes, their pro- perty, their altars, and their graves ; a war for their civil rights and liberties. They fight for everything which renders life desirable ; for all that is calculated to inspire the soul, exalt the courage, iuvigorate the defense. They fight by the glare of their burning vil- lages and wasted fields to stay the march of desolation. If all this does not make their cause righteous, and our cause wicked, then is moral sense confounded, and language has lost its meaning. Wo are pretty familiar with the reasons you give for your coarse. They are all of the earth, earthy; political reasons, every one of them. When our Saviour said, " Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's, he did not undertake to determine what were Cnosar's, he came for no such purpose ; in another place we read, that he submitted to a wrong, paid unjust tribute, rather than make any disturbance. Are you better and wiser than he ? And have your studies and mariner of life been such as to qualify you to propound and determine grave political propositions ? Without hazarding an opinion on such a delicate subject, we will briefly notice some of the reasons, or excuses referred to. You tell us " the laws must be obeyed." This was 30 the argument of the Jews to Pilate : " We have a law, and by that law he ought to die." It was the language of the Inquisition. It has been the language of tyranny and persecution all the world over. Despotism gene- rally moves with a retinue of forms and ceremonies, and in the name of law and government. " Wisdom is better than weapons of war, and mercy is better than sacrifice." * Again : " The life of the nation is at stake." What ? Can the life of a nation, by any possibility, consist in the desolation of a country as extensive as all Europe, and the extermination of its inhabitants ? Was ever such a hecatomb to " the life of the nation" conceived of before? If this be the life of the nation, surely it will stink in the nostrils of humanity for ages. The life of a nation is in the life of its people, their happiness and affections. A government which is not founded on these, deserves to stand, no, not for a single day. Again : "The Union must be preserved." This argu- ment served pretty well for a season, but now, we pre- sume, it has ceased to impose upon even the most cred- ulous of your number ; for those in whose train yqu are have spoken very plainly what they do not intend to have, we wish they would be as explicit in saying what they do intend to have. The Union, as it was transmitted to us — a union of freemen, of equals, friends ; a union of reciprocal rights and interests, of fidelity, of honor, of justice, and har- mony — a union strong through the virtuous enjoy- ment of liberty, Ueloved by its citizens, respected by its friends, feared by its enemies — all good men would con- sider to be among the greatest of earthly benefits. But a union of masters and subjects, of unequals, of enemies, of discords and differences, of perpetual hatred, revenge, and strife ; a union of oppression, with suffer- ing — of fierce exultation, with bitter abasement ; a union 31 with abject ruin on the one hand, and arrogant pros- perity on the other ; a union strong through its con- quests over rights and liberties ; a union abhorred by one third of its own people, respected by no power on the globe, and feared only by the weak ; a union bear- ing the seeds of its own confusion — such a union as this presents an unnatural and loathsome conjunction ; it would deserve to be rejected from among the nations, even as Heaven rejected the devil and his angels. Here, reverend fathers and brethren, we leave you> If we have said anything harsh, we regret the necessi- ty as much as any one possibly can. You have compelled this discussion, by an unwar- rantable and pernicious meddling in secular political affairs. " Thus saith the Lord: I have not sent these prophets, yet they ran ; I have not spoken to them, yet they pro- phesied. But if they had stood in my counsels, and caused my people to hear my words, then should they have turned from their evil ways, and from the evil of their doings." Peace hath other enemies besides those already no- ticed. There are those whose property is engaged in the war, and who think their pecuniary safety involved in its success. The time is coming, when they will realize the truth of the proverb : "Better is a little with righteousness, than great revenues without right." ' As this war is now conducted, it must involve the whole country in social, political, and pecuniary ruin, whether it succeed or fail. The vast paper baloon in which you ride so high, must come down some day, the sooner that event occurs the lighter will be your fall, and the quicker your re- covery. There are those who live and profit by the war. Their 32 name is legion, and they swarm daily ; most of these are insensible to any other argument than that which is addressed to the pocket. If you point to the storm which is coming, it only makes them all the busier. They must make hay while the sun shines. There are those who are opposed to a government of equals, who are opposed to any union which does not lean to their side, who want a strong government of which they are masters. We have already referred to these people. They are mainly of New England, or New England descent and traditions. During the Revolutionary War, it became manifest that Massachusetts fought for independence, but not for Republican liberty. Her preference was for a monarch- ical form of government. This preference took a more decided shape at the close of the war, in what was known as the Federal or black cockade party, of which John Adams, then Vice-President, was the chief. Mr. Adams became President in H97, and forthwith exerted all the power of his administration to give effect to his favorite policy. The press was muzzled ; the editors punished, by fine and imprisonment, for opposing the measures of the Federalists ; freedom of discussion was interfered with ; a standing army was raised, under pretext of a war with France ; no Democrat was to be trusted ; enormous taxes and stamp duties were laid. It was, in many respects, the history of the past three years, in miniature. The Constitution well undermined, it was expected that there would be no barrier to consolidation ; the es- tablishment of privileged orders, offices for life, and even hereditary succession. From that time to the present, that Federal party, under various names, has been in existence and work- ing. The Embargo Act was made a pretext for a dissolu- tion of the Union, and a union with Canada, under the 33 protection of the British Crown. Then came the pur- chase of Louisiana, it also was a grievance, calling" for dissolution and a monarchy. There was a plan formed for a separate government in New England, to extend, if practicable, so as to in- clude Pennsylvania. The States were to be secured through their governors and legislators ; the Legisla- tures were to repeal the laws authorizing the people to elect representatives to Congress ; they were to de- cline electing senators ; and thus, gradually, the States were to withdraw from the Union and set up for them- selves. The people were instigated to forcible resistance to the Administration, and juries after juries acquitted the culprits. A separation was openly discussed and stimulated in the public prints, and a convention of delegates from the New England States was intended and proposed. In November, 1808, John Quincy Adams was a pri- vate citizen, residing in Boston. Mr. Giles, and several other members of Congress, wrote to him confidential letters on the state of affairs. In his answer, he was led to enlarge upon the views and purposes of certain leaders of the party which had the management of the Legislature in their hands, he said : " That their object was, and had been for several years, a dissolution of the Union and the establishment of a separate confed- eration, he knew from unequivocal evidence, although not provable in a court of law, and that, in case of civil war, the aid of Great Britain would be as surely resorted to, as it would be indispensably necessary to the design." In Mr. Adams' letter, in defense of this statement, he says : " That project, I repeat, had gone to the length of fixing upon a military leader for its execution; and, although the circumstances of the time never admitted of its execution, nor even of its development, I had yet 2* 34 no doubt, in 1808 and 1809, and have no doubt at this time, is the key to all the great movements of those leaders of the Federal party in New England'from that time forward to its final catastrophe in the Hartford Convention." The next witness is John Henry, a British secret agent, employed, in 1809, in the New England States, but more especially at Boston. His business was to foment disaffection to the General Government ; to in- trigue for the purpose of bringing about resistance to the laws, and eventually, in concert with a British force, to destroy the Union and bring the eastern part thereof into a political relation with Great Britain. Henry was received in New England with great heartiness and hospitality ; he testifies fully to the ex- tent of the plot, and the hostile designs of the Federal party ; his correspondence is full and interesting ; it will be found in the third volume of the American Re- view, and the fourth volume of the Abridged Debates of Congress, by John C. Reeves. It was this same party which caused New England to oppose the Government in the war of 1812 ; to do all in her power to thwart, retard, defeat, its successful prosecution ; to adhere to our enemies, giving them aid and comfort. The Boston banks endeavored to defeat the Govern- ment loans, by draiuing the Middle and Southern States of their specie. A great portion of this specie was drawn into the British Provinces, to pay for gov- ernment bills, and for smuggled goods ; or forwarded to the agents of the Government of Canada. Commer- cial intercourse with the enemy was carried on with- out attempt at concealment. A combination was formed to prevent Congress rais- ing money for the war. Those who would subscribe to the loans were denounced in the public prints as infamous. 35 On motion of the Hon. Josiah Quincy, (in 18G2 a lively war man) the Senate of Massachusetts resolved that they could not pass a vote of thauks to Captain Lawrence, for the capture of the Peacock, "it being considered by them as an encouragement and incite- ment to the continuance of the present unjust, imneces- sar}% and iniquitous war." And also resolved, " As the sense of the Se'nate of Massachusetts, that in a war like the present, waged without justifiable cause,' and prosecuted in a manner which indicates that conquest and ambition are its real mtjtiivs, it is no't becoming a moral and religious people to express any approbation of military or naval exploits which are not immediately connected with our sea-coast and soil." In this connection, we notice that New England was exempted from the enemy's blockade, and all other hostile proceedings : June 1, 1813, Commodore Decatur, with his fleet, was chased into the harbor of New London, by a greatly su- perior force, and there closely blockaded to the close of the war. Twice, in tempestuous weather, he endeavored to elude the blockaders and get to sea ; each time he was foiled by treason from the shore, signaling the British, fleet by blue-lights, which were answered by the firing of guns. Said the Boston Gazette: " Is there a patriot in Ame- rica who considers it his duty to shed his blood for Bonaparte, for Madison, for Jefferson, and that host of ruffians in Congress who have set their faces against us for years, and spirited^up the brutal part of the populace to destroy us ? Not one. Shall we any longer be held in slavery and driven to desperate poverty by such a graceless faction ? Heaven forbid 1" Said another Boston journal : " To the cry of dis- union, the plain and obvious answer is, that the States are already sqiarated. The bond of the Union is already broken by President Madison." 36 Nor were the clergy, the Third House, or the House of Lords, idle on that occasion. Their highest powers of denunciation and abuse had full exercise in the ser- vice of Great Britain. Says the Rev. Elijah Parish, D. D., in a discourse delivered at Byfield, April 7, 1814 : " The Israelites became weary of yielding the fruits of their labor to pamper their splendid tyrants. They left their political woes. They separated. Where is our Moses ? Where is the rod of his miracles ? Where » is our Aaron ? * * * Such is the temper of the American republic, so called, a new language must be invented before we attempt to express the baseness of their conduct, or describe' the rottenness of their hearts. * * * New England, if invaded, would be obliged to defend herself. Do you not, then, owe it to your children, and owe it to your God, to make peace for yourselves ? " How will the supporters of this anti-Christian war- fare endure their sentence ; endure their own reflec- tions ; endure the fire that forever burns, the worm which never dies, the hosannahs of Heaven, while the smoke of their torments ascends forever and ever V The Rev. Mr. Osgood, of Medford, in a discourse preached June 27, 1812, said : " His mind was in a constant agony at the guilt of the war — its outrages against heaven ; against aJl truth, honesty, justice, goodness ; against all the prin- ciples of social happiness. Were not the authors of this war, in character, nearly akin to the deists and atheists of France ? Were they not men of hardened hearts, seared consciences, reprobate minds, and des- perate wickedness ? " If, at the command of weak or wicked rulers, they undertake an unjust war, each man who volunteers his services in such a cause, or loans his money for its support, or by his conversation, his writings, or any 37 other mode of influence, encourages its prosecution, that man is an accomplice in the wickedness ; leads his conscience with the blackest crimes ; brings the guilt of blood upon his soul, and, in the sight of 'God and his laws, is a murderer." The Rev. J. S, Gardiner, Rector of Trinity Church, Boston, July 23, 1812, offered off as follows : " It is a war unexampled in the history of the world, wantonly proclaimed on the most frivolous and ground- less pretenses, against a nation from whose friendship we might derive the most signal advantages. u Let no consideration whatever, my brethren, deter you at all times, and in all places, from execrating the present war. As Mr. Madison has declared war, let Mr. Madison carry it on. " The Union has been long since virtually dissolved, and it is full time that this part of the dis-United States should take care of itself." We next come to the Hartford Convention. It as- sembled 15th December, 1814, remained in session twenty days, and made a report, accompanied by a series of resolutions. From the report we extract a few cardinal paragraphs : " If the Union be destined to dissolution, by reason of the multiplied abuses of bad administration, it should, if possible, be the work of peaceful times and deliberate consent. Some new form of confederation should be substituted among those States which shall intend to maintain a federal relation to each other." " Whenever it appears that these causes are radical and permanent, a separation by equitable arrangement will be preferable to an alliance by constraint among nominal friends, but real enemies, inflamed, by mutual hatred and jealousy, and inviting, by intestine divisions, contempt and aggression from abroad." " In case of deliberate, dangerous, and palpable in- fractions of the Constitution, affecting the sovereignty 38 of a State, and the liberties of the people, it is not only the right, but the duty of such a State to interpose its authority for protection in a manner best calculated to secure that Snd" " When emergencies occur, which are either beyond the reach of the judicial tribunals, or too pressing to admit of the delay incident to their forms, States which have no common umpire must be their own judges, and exe- cute their own decisions" Every one of the New England States was represent- ed in this convention. The Federalist merged in the old Whig party, they in the Republican, all having the same commercial, manufacturing, and shipping interests to protect, and all pursuing the same policy. It is a policy of exclu- sive benefits and protections, as if the many were made for the few, the poor for the rich, the producer for the non-producer. They constitute your monopolists of every kind; they have been continually pressing such changes in the character of our Government as would secure their su- premacy, and convert the nation into a close political corporation for their especial benefit. For the Union they care nothing, except as it coin- cides with their interests. In 1812, it was impious to carry on war against a foreign enemy. Why ? It was against their interest. In 1864, it is impious to make peace with your* own brethren. It is against their interest. Greediness and ambition are at the root of the whole matter. In 1843, the Legislature of Massachusetts resolved, that, because Texas was annexed, Massachusetts was out of the Union. / . On the 1st of February, 1850, a New Hampshire senator presented a petition, praying for a dissolu- tion of the Union, and it received, in the Senate, the 39 votes of John P. Halo, Win. H. Seward, and Salmon P. Chase. * In the House : of Charles Allen, Massachusetts ; Charles Durkee, Wisconsin; Joshua R. Giddings, Ohio; R. K. Goodenovv, Maine; G. W.Julian, Indiana; Preston W. King', New York, and I. M. Root, Ohio. All men of this Federal Republican party. The same party it was which so bitterly opposed the Mexican war. Horace Greeley called our soldiers "jour- neymen cut-throats," and Thomas Corwin hoped " they might be met with bloody hands, and welcomed to hospitable graves." In 1858, said Governor, now Major-General N. P. Banks, the blushing hero of Louisiana, said : " I can conceive when this Constitution shall not be in existence. When we shall have an absolute military . dictatorial government, transmitted from age to age, with men at its head who are made rulers by military commission, or who claim an hereditary right to gov- ern those over whom they are placed." All the leaders of the Republican party can tell you, in the words of Mr. Stevens: " that this talk of restor- ing the Union as it was, under the Constitution as it is, is one of the- absurdities which I have heard repeated until I have become about sick of it." Or, in the words of Vice-President Hamlin : " We have a class of men amoug us in Maine, who very much want the Constitu- tion as it is, and the Union as it was. * * * I am very sorry, indeed, that, they can not have it. There is no possible way in which they can have it. It is a mere demagogism, mere clap-trap; it is nonsense; it is not very good nonsense." There are acts which speak louder than words: the revolutionary, imperial designs of the Republican party — the attempted subjugation of States by force of arms — the decrees of the Executive, especially that concern- ing the recognition of State governments, on the appli- ) 40 cation of one-tenth of their voters — the subordination of the civil to the military power. And here we would call attention to the promptness with which the afore- said Major-General Banks has inaugurated the new dictature, by proclaiming in Louisiana: " That military law is the fundamental law of the land." The open denial or disregard of State rights; military conscrip- tion; contempt of the Constitution, as exhibited in the creation of a State out of Western Virginia; making paper money a legal tender for the payment of debts; repeated and outrageous violations of personal liberty, and many other instances. There is, then, that extensive system of national legislation to which we already referred. Everything that is done, legislative and executive, judicial and military, tends to the absolute dependence of the whole country, and of all the States, on a grand central government, whose Executive has already been invested with absolute powers, by an act of Congress which exempts his acts from judicial investigation ; him and his minions from punishment. The land, the very air, are full of the sounds, sights, and omens of despotism, and its significant menace may be read in the name of the iron war ship now ly- ing at our docks : Dictator ! May she sink at her moorings unless that name bo changed. We will close the proof on this point, by quoting from an editorial in a certain number of the New York Daily Times, headed, " The Conscription a National Benefit "Yet it is a great national blessing that the con- scription has been imposed. It is a matter of prime concern that it should now be settled, once for all, whether this Government is, or is not, strong enough to compel military service in its defense. u More than any other thing, this will determine our, durability as a republic [1], and our formidableness as a nation. 41 " Once established, that, not only the property, but the personal military services of every able-bodied citi- zen is at the command of the national authorities, con stitutionally exercised [!], and both successful rebellion and successful invasion are at once made impossible for all time to come. " From that time it will be set down as a known fact, that the United States is the most solidly based [de- based [!] government on the face of the ea^th." If this be not military despotism, what is it ? These conspirators against the republic, have trav- eled fast and far, but they do not feel quite secure, Peace, even now, might frustrate all their plots. War is necessary to insure their success. Ye Union shriekers I Ye denouncers of this unholy, damnable, causeless rebellion I Ye worshipers of the institutions of our fathers 1. Ye adorers of the sacred flag ! Ye contemners of " that accursed doctrine of State rights !" Ye fierce promoters of this holy war ! Ye Federalists and descendants of Federalists, what think you of the record ? The last of the enemies to peace, whom we shall men- tion, are the Abolitionists. This, also, is an old breed, hailing from that land of consolation, New England, aforesaid. When the Puritans first settled in that country they found it necessary to commit a good many acts of cru- elty and injustice against the natives and owners of the soil. It was thereupon deemed expedient to give the Colonies the character of a sacred mission. So the colon- ists became the chosen people, like unto the Israelites in the land of Canaan ; and their mission was to drive out the heathen, kill or make captive, and possess their lands. From that time forth this way of thinking be- came a peculiarity of the Puritan character. Their theology, their school of morals, their conscience, are always found on the best of terms with their interest. 42 The Puritans bad need of slaves, and the Indians made good slaves, for want of better. Then came the negro ; he was much more tractable and every way more useful than the Indian, so the Indian was ship- ped to the West Indies and sold ; it was their duty to deliver the land from the heathen. The proceeds of the sales answered for an adventure to Africa ; the outward cargo was well invested in a lot of benighted Africans for home, who were thus brought under the in- fluence of the Gospel. This negro trade grew and prospered. Our traders dealt wjth all parts of the^country, and all the colonies were pretty well stocked with slaves. During all this time it never entered into the minds of our friends that slavery was a sin, or. anything unusual ; their slaves ■ were strictly governed, sold at auction, reclaimed, when runaway, by Fugitive Slave Laws, and everything else of that sort. In the convention which framed the articles of the Confederation of 1778, the North proposed a tax on population, and that slaves should be included in the estimate. To this the South objected, that slaves were property, sold, bought, and paid for as such. John Adams replied : u It is of no consequence by what name you call your people, by that of freemen or of slaves ; the difference as to states is imaginary only ; in some countries the laboring poor are called freemen, in others they are called slaves ; but the difference as to state is imagin- ary only. What matters it whether the landlord, em- ploying the laborers on his farm, give them annually as much money as will buy them the necessaries of life, or gives them those necessaries at short hand V In the next convention, onr friends found it convenient to consider slaves as property, and such they insisted on their being considered. In that convention, the votes of New England, not- 43 withstanding the protests of Virginia, Delaware, and other Middle States, fastened the African slave-trade upon the country for twenty years ; and it was the people of New England who carried that slave-trade on. \ Massachussetts was the first to find out that negroes were not profitable, and the first to dispose of them. In due time, her example was followed by the other North- ern States 5 Emancipation Laws were passed ; the great bulk of the marketable negroes were sent South and sold ; the foreign slave-trade had expired by lim- itation of law ; there was nothing more to be made out of that business, and the account was closed ; but another account was soon opened — the Abolition ac- count. This had its origin in political jealousy of the South. It has been fostered by ambition, covetousness, sec- tional hatred, and sustained under the pretense of re- ligion, philanthropy, and patriotism. The only sincere and consistent Abolitionists that we know of are to be found in the society of Friends ; to be sure, they are sentimentalists, and know little or noth- ing of the mischiefs they deplore, whether they are real or unreal, or what degree of exaggeration there is in them ; but they are, in the main, honest ; they do not seek to do evil, that fancied good may come ; they did not slaughter the Indians, that they might possess their lands ; nor did they ever make domestic slaves of them, nor sell them into foreign bondage ; they never were engaged in the African slave trade ; nor did they ever, that vvc know of, sell their domestic slaves away off South ; give a title, take the money, then turu round, deny the ownership, and denounce the owner. We would not, for a moment, liken these people, mis- taken though they be, to that New England creature bearing the name of Abolitionist, which is all hypocrisy and all cruelty ; which these many years has enriched 44 itself from the profits of all the crimes it assumes to denounce ; and more ! Prate not to us of a sincerity and benevolence, or of a' religion, which urges on its terrible crusade of free- dom, reckless of consequences, like another Jugger- naut in its bloody progress, with a tumultuous crowd of fierce idolators enjoying the sacrifice. Pernicious infidels that ye are, in politics as in morals. Ye learn nothing, deny everything, and are false to the bottom of your hearts. You can not create, but you can destroy, and leave society amid the ruins ; per- fectly willing to set the world in a blaze, if you can roast your eggs by the fire. The chief men and apostles of this sect are what is called preachers, a very peculiar and privileged peo- ple ; whatsoever they bind on earth is bound in heaven, and whatsoever they loose on earth is loosed in heaven. To them all things are remitted, and they can remit all things, whether it be fidelity to God, to country, or to laws. In matters of abuse, anathema, and denunciation, they claim a prescriptive right and exercise the largest liberty. They rave prodigiously, and, like the losing Pythoness of old, froth and mutter fearful rhapsodies. They are exceeding wroth and righteous against an in- stitution of which they know nothing, except as it ex- isted among themselves ; to them slavery is " the sin of all sins f " the sum of all villainies " that ac- cursed thing ;" " the spawn of hell and child of the devil." They would dethrone Deity, and tell you that if God ever established human bondage he is no God of theirs ; that a religion which recognizes human bond- age is no religion of theirs. Who and what their god is, we can not certainly say ; their inclinations are various and fickle. As a general rule, whatever claims affinity with that which they style " self-evident truths," is sentimental, emo- tional, •'passional, and the like, may expect an altar 45 and a statue in their pantheon, which is the pantheon of " moral development." The present object of their worship is a huge con- glomerate of false sentiments and vile passions ; a dark, repulsive, obscene monster, which reminds us of the abominable figures of pagan idolatry. It is an in- satiable beast, thirsty and gluttonous, though particu- lar. Its drink is blood — rivers of blood ; and for meat it devours the people and their substance, to the rav- ishing harmony of lamentation, woe, and bitterness. The whole land is now busy feeding this divine crea- ture ; he becomes grosser and more beastly every day, yet never is satisfied, but ravenous still. Such are some of the enemies to our peace. But why are all these people so restress — so labo- rious ? Why do they resort to every contrivance of artifice and misrepresentation ? Why do they compass sea and land with apologists, seeking for proselytes ? Why are they so eager in protestation ; so vociferous and declamatory ; so intolerant of opposition and so bitter ? Why so suspicious and fearful ? Why do they see King Richard in every bush ? u Row is it with me, when every noise appalls me ?" Innocence fs not wont to be thus disturbed ; nor is a good cause so very malignant, apprehensive, and im- portunate. It is the bloody business which informs against them. They are fearful and troubled in their own minds.; their vision is perplexed. Like Belshazzar they dread to see the hand-writing on the wall. They tremble. The joints of their loins are loose, and their knees smite one against another. An evil conscience will not let them rest. The pro- phetic spectre of a ruined country stalks in grim ma- jesty before them. The voice of their brother's blood calls out against them from the ground. 46 Success is the only relief they have ; and, what a desperate relief that is ! Through blood, breast high— an Egyptian plague of blood — and, beyond that, re- morse, recrimination, hatred, strife, darkness. Yet, they must not, dare not, fail, if all the powers of hell be called to aid them ; for failure is perdition ; it pre- cipitates that period, sure, to come, when, with Cain, they will be compelled to cry out : "My punishment is greater than I can bear. Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth, and from thy face shall I be hid ; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond upon the earth ; and it shall come to pass that every one that findeth me, shall slay me V 1 In what we have said, are there not found persuasive arguments for peaces-sweet peace ? Some will laugh to scorn the dangers we have de- clared. They will point to our prosperity as never so great. Trust it not, it is unnatural, deceitful, and one day will be swept off as with a breath. J Tis like flowers which bloom in the crater of a slumbering volcano. Some will point to our resources as infinite ; to our strength and energy ; to that combination of national power which never yet has been withstood. Remember, that to all things there is ari end. Thus Athens trusted, and Carthage, and Rome, and many others. Their trust betrayed them, and they fell. Others, agitated by emotions of a different character, chagrined, overpowered, by the magnitude of the evils which have befallen the land of our love and pride, seek their resolution in despair — follow the counsels of that dark spirit, who, " Rather than be less, cared not to be at all." The sentiment was worthy of the soil. We adopt no such forbidding determination. It may suit the spendthrift, the gambler, the suicide. It is not fit for 47 men. Hurl such counsels back to the place from whence they came. " If thou faint in the day of adversity, thy strength is small." No one can tell what is before us. The present is terrible, and humiliating. The future looks dark, very dark. Our country is divided — whether again to bo united, God knoweth ! Suppose it prove otherwise ; have we not territory enough for the most ambitious ? Augustus Csesar voluntarily withdrew his legions and curtailed the em- pire. The result verified bis sagacity and judgment. It consolidated the power and prolonged the existence of Rome. Great Britain lost nothing when she lost the Colo- nies. She exchanged troublesome subjects for pro- fitable allies. Behold this extended north land, it is ours to possess; this fertile soil, it is ours to improve ; this salubrious climate, it is ours to enjoy ; these highways to the sea ; these spacious harbors ; these embraciug oceans ; this great and industrious people ; these useful neigh- bors ; these moral and intellectual enjoyments ; these precious gifts of law, liberty, and religion. Are all these nothing, that they are to be abandoned to despe- rate resolves ? The madness of the times will pass away, and better men will come to light. " What constitutes a State ? Not high raised battlements, or labored mound, Thick wall, or moated gate ! Nor cities proud, with spires and turrets crowned, Where, laughing at the storm, proud navies ride; Where low-browed baseness wafts perfume to pride. No ! Men— high-minded men — men who their duties know, But know their rights, and, knowing, dare maintain ; These constitute a State !" If we are to continue under the domiuion of our pas- 48 sions, the sooner this wretched carnival closes the better ; for the end must come. Our nation will fall, and her liberties be driven forth as evil spirits, to grope among the tombs of abused departed greatness. Fellow-citizens, turn from those who clamor for un- sparing and perpetual war — destruction and misery are in their path. Listen to the voice of reason, conscience, and human- ity. Listen to the sounds of woe from those war-smitten regions. Listen to the spirit of brotherly love and • charity. Listen to the admonitions of prudence and sound judgment. Listen to the voice of the revolutionary fathers, as it sounds from their consecrated graves, pleading with you : Spare, ye children ! Oh, spar,e! for the sake of the sacrifices we have made in Freedom's cause, for all of you. The temple which at great cost we reared, why do ye thus pollute and destroy ? Blast not our memories with fratricidal strife 1 Drench not our graves with fratricidal blood ! Was it for this we periled fortune, life, and sacred honor? For this we toiled and suffered, in winter's withering cold, and summer's blasting heat ? For this we offered up our lives on many a desperate- deadly field ? Forbear! By all that is sacred in the past, dear in the present, hopeful in the future ; in the name of your common humanity; your common religion; your common liberties, we command you, to forbear ! Listen to the voice of angels singing : Peace on earth and good-will toward men. Listen to Christ, the great teacher : Blessed are the peace-makers, for they shall be called the children of God. lEx IGtbns seVmour durst 4 po*