MASTER NtGATIVE NO. 94-82049- 11 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted materials including foreign works under certain conditions. In addition, the United States extends protection to foreign works by means of various International conventions, bilateral agreements, and proclamations. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or ater uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be iable for copyright Infringement. The Columbia University Libraries reserve the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgement, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of the copyright law. Author: Pi\iey, Francis William i |f I / Trie director u i andbook Place: London Date: 1900 MASTER NEGATIVE # COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES PRESERVATION DIVISION BIBLIOGRAPHIC MICROFORM TARGET ORIGINAL MATERIAL AS FILMED - EXISTING BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD \2?A P68 Pixley, Francis V/illiam, 1852- The director's handbook, by Francis \7, 3d ed. London, Good, 1900. 176. p. 22 cm. Pixley, ., o RESTRICTIONS ON USE: FILM SIZE: .35" fA/^ TECHNICAL MICROFORM DATA REDUCTION RATIO: /^>r DATE FILMED IMAGE PLACEMENT: lA (IIA ) IB IIB TRACKING # : INITIALS: FILMED BY PRESERVATION RESOURCES, BETHLEHEM. PA. In 3 3 CPQ r— J zf. rn >Er O o O on < 7x ^-^ \ 'I ,- /•'■T^ "-v^ 00 f^^ ""^ CJ1 3 3 > r-T" \s^ o m n Ti CD O I — ' 3" ( r>. — r CJl ^ 00 "g -~o < -H •C!"'^ ^'*"»». ^# A*?' ^ ^ J^M > •v*^ s/, .-v?' "? '^W^ ' ^^^7^ ^ |*#- en O 3 3 2.5 mm s i «|.^w o fPBlsPEKIsl! Fr I to MU bo o 00 b ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPORSTUVWXYZ abcd€tghi|klmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890 ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234^67890 ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890 -W ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXY. abrneteiiijklmnopqrstiivwxvz ■'1234567890 ^o % ^^ ¥cP ^■o ^f^ #■ ^ V X- kS= ^d> —f ^o fp f^ P. C^ m H 3] ^: «' ^o i-p 3 3 0) CT >> &> O" -»—"* n >, IT X-. -*o — --^_ T~ ,_ fo _. ^ "■^ -M-. 3x ^^^ 3 C -=; s^' -^ ^ iaz 50 ^^ s_,. 5 -^ ^ X "^ CO *— ' — 1 ^C £14/3 *^< •^— 1 $;:€ f^c cnx -vJ-< OOM CTiX >>J-< 00 NJ *« >j«: .<.Vs ■i^.- ij-j>. ?:ij- ..*' .*^ h u-v-r if '< ' r >■* 1 ■i' • •» 'a 'j''^*^ L-S^iS l^' :ll ¥"'f: fi m '^ 'M r '* •f, >'j -'^ ^"t If . ^SN^ "f ' V' * ■ '-> .- 'i ■S; 1 n1 ■w ■yt , f ' :::|i»*^ife:^M#*?{«J'^'"!M*'SI/*ISi4^ ^^x\ Colurabm lanibersitp inttjeCitpofiietDgorb LIBRARY From the Library of BERTRAND CHASE HINMAN School of Mines, '90 4 i THE Director's Handbook, BY FRANCIS W. PIXLEY, 0/ the Middle Temple, Barrister-at-Laii\ A Fellow and Member of the Council of the Instiiutt of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. AUTHOR OF *'Thk Shareholder's Handbook;" " Auditors : their Duties and Respoxsibiijties," &c., &c. r H I R D E D I T I O X, ILonDon : HENRY GOOD k SON. 12, ArOORGATE STREET, E.C. 1900. PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION. i ^J I C-tr^o I / /u tL-^JCt ^^< ^ c / < ' LONDON I'RINThI) I!Y IIENRV OOOP AND SON, CP ^ ^ ' f (f) 12, MOOROArE STRHKT, K.C. T) n 4 T^b^ 'n^HE object of the '^ Director's Handbook" is to supply Directors of Companies, more especially of those registered under the Companies Acts, 1862 to 1900, with a practical treatise on their administrative duties. It is hoped it will also assist intending Directors of projected Companies in the preliminary stages, including the consideration of the Prospectus, the Articles of Association, and other documents demanding attention prior to the issue of the Prospectus and the Allotment of Shares. F. W. P. London : \st October^ 1900. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. DuTiKS Prior to the Ai^lotment of Shares CHAPTER II. The Allotment of Shares CHAPTER III. Duties After the Allotment of Shares PAGE. 50 Board Meetings CHAPTER IV. •• ••• ■•• 66 CHAPTER V. Meetings of Shareholders ... 86 CHAPTER VI. General Duties and Powers of Directors 113 CHAPTER VII. Winding Up ... • • • • • • •• 143 The Directors' Liability Act, 1890 154 JL ixULS jfi. ... ... ••• ••• ••• ••• •'•0/ X W Ux!r^ ... ••• ... ... ... ..♦ ... ...iyvj THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. CHAPTER I. DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. THE position of a Director of a Public Company has always been one involving great trust, and consequently, grave responsibilities ; but the passing of "The Directors' Liability Act, 1890," and, ten years later, " The Companies Act, 1900," materially increased the risk and responsibility of being the Director of a new Company or of an existing Company issuing additional shares and debentures. The duties of Directors, as the name implies, are to direct the Company's affairs, to appoint proper officers, who are responsible to them for the management of the details of the business carried on by the Company, reserving for themselves the more important questions of adminis- tration. The Director of a new Company has, in addition to these duties, the extra responsibility that, by placing his name on a prospectus, he indicates that he has thoroughly considered the objects of the proposed Company, and firmly believes in its chance THE director's HANDBOOK. of success ; he is, moreover, liable to pay compensa- tion to all persons who have subscribed for shares or debentures on the faith of this prospectus for the loss or damage they may have sustained by reason of any untrue statement in the prospectus or in any report or memorandum appearing therein. Apart from these liabilities, his pecuniary risk may be limited to the extent of his qualification shares, and of any additional sum he may choose to invest in the Company, but he accepts the responsibility of a Trustee inviting subscriptions from the public, who look to him and his colleagues to fully satisfy them- selves that all due precautions have been taken before they ask those who have not the same facilities for inquiry and investigation to invest in the undertaking. At the same time there is not any reason existing in the Companies Acts, or in the latest legal decisions, which need deter anyone, who is prepared to perform his duties in a careful manner, from becoming a Director of an established Company, or of one formed to take over an established business, or of one formed even to undertake an enterprise of an entirely new character. A Director should, however, have the requisite time at his disposal to attend to his duties. *' It should be understood that a Director consenting to be a Director has assumed a position involving duties which cannot be shirked by leaving everything to others'' [Drincqhier v. Wood). DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 3 Upon being invited to act as a Director of a Company in course of formation, there are many matters to be considered before giving consent. In the first place, it is advisable to ascertain w^hat is the position of Companies transacting business similar to that proposed to be undertaken by the new Company, for which purpose '' The Stock Exchange Official Intelli- gence," or the "■ Stock Exchange Year Book," both annual publications, may be consulted with great advantage. In these books will be found the dates of the incorporation of the principal Companies, their capital, periodical dividends, and other useful infor- mation. Should the position of these Companies be satis- factory, the intending Director should then consider whether any proposed innovation on the business of the established Companies would be likely to have a beneficial or contrary effect, as it is very common for new Companies to be formed on the lines of established successful Companies, with a distinguishing feature which it is supposed will be a special inducement for influencing a share of the business which it is apparently so profitable to conduct. Another important consideration is the position (social or commercial) of the other proposed Directors. Some, if not all, will probably be connected with other Companies, and the position of these Companies should be ascertained. The " Directory of Directors," an annual B 2 THE director's HANDBOOK. publication, will, for this purpose, in conjunction with the books already mentioned, be useful to the intending Director, and he should inquire into the antecedents of those gentlemen who have not previously acted as Directors, ascertain their social position, and, to a certain extent, their aptitude for acting on the Board of a Company. The position and capabilities of the Directors with whom one is asked to associate is of more importance than appears at first sight. It is almost impossible for a Director to attend every meeting, and when he is absent he will be bound by the resolutions passed, although he may entirely dis- agree with their purport. It is true he may at a subsequent Board meeting have an opportunity ot recording his protest against any resolution passed in his absence, and, if not too late, endeavour to prevent it being carried into effect; but it is most desirable to be associated as a Director with those only in whom the greatest confidence, both as to integrity and capability, can be reposed. It is also very desirable that a proposed Director should ascertain definitely who are the promoters of the Company, whether they have been engaged in this capacity before, and, if so, what has been the fate of the Companies started under their auspices. Although the promoter, of course, disappears after the allotment of shares, still he has it in his power to in- volve the Directors in very great difficulties, and DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 5 those who are known to have promoted Companies which have come to a disastrous ending should be avoided. Attempts are frequently made to conceal from the proposed Directors the names of the real promoters by putting forward those who are merely their nominees. In some cases this is done by the promoters themselves, in consequence of their being aware of their own evil reputation. Under the circumstances the inquirer may meet with a difficulty in ascertaining the information he is seeking, but it is one which can always be surmounted. An intending Director should know, in addition to the nature of the business proposed to be transacted, what obligations will have to be taken over by the Company after the allotment of shares. He should, therefore, ask to see any contracts which have been entered into by the promoters, and which will be binding upon the Company on the date at which it will be entitled to commence business. These should be carefully perused by him, and, should he be of opinion they are not really drawn in the interest of the proposed Company, but rather to saddle it with either undesirable responsibilities or property, he should at once decline to act. Many Companies are formed for the purpose of their purchasing a declining business, or an estate or property of some kind which could not be sold in the O THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. ordinary market, and which can only be disposed of by its owner successfully floating a Company to take it off his hands. On the other hand, the Companies Acts afford those who may wish to retire from business, also executors of deceased traders and others, great facilities for realising sound businesses and other properties, which, from their value, are beyond the resources of ordinary buyers. The antecedents of the proposed officers should also be inquired into, the ability and standing of the Solicitors being especially of great importance. An intending Director can easily ascertain whether the Solicitors bear a good name, or whether they have been associated with the promotion of Companies which are known to have been formed more with the object of enriching the promoters than of becoming sound investments for the public. The prospectus is frequently presented to the proposed Directors with the appointments of manager, secretary, and other officials inserted. As the persons thus nominated are usually friends of the promoter, their past career should be most carefully investigated, the appointments being, perhaps, conferred on them as a reward for past services, or for other reasons, without any regard being had for their suitability for the positions assigned to them. It is usual to call together the intending Directors DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 7 of a Company to discuss the proposed Memorandum and Articles of Association, the Prospectus, and other documents intended to be issued with it, and for this purpose many meetings are frequently necessary. An intending Director should be careful to attend all these meetings, and, however he may trust his proposed co-Directors, he should not, when unable to attend himself, rely on the fact of their being present on the ground that their interests are the same. The documents which have to be settled before the Company is incorporated are of the greatest importance, and every sentence in the Prospectus, and many clauses in the Memorandum and Articles of Association, require the greatest care in discussion before they are finally approved. Previous to the passing of - The Directors' Liability Act, 1890," a shareholder who brought an action against Directors to recover money lost through his subscribing for shares on the statements put forward in the prospectus had to prove either fraud or negligence on the part of the Directors, but now the onus is laid upon the Directors, when an action for compensation has been brought against them, of proving that they had reasonable ground for believing, and did believe up to the time of the allotment, that all statements made in the prospectus were true. In addition, therefore, to satisfying themselves that the statements are true, the Directors of a { 8 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. proposed Company should have documentary evidence of the correctness of every fact put forward in the prospectus, and arrange for its safe custody, so that they may be able to produce it, if necessary, for the purpose of proving they were justified in inviting subscriptions for capital from the public. A proposed Director should not permit the promoter to hurry him through the preliminaries. It is no protection to him to be assured by the promoter that everything is in order, and that it is wasting time to go over the ground again. The interests of the two are not identical, the responsibility of the Director beginning when the project of the promoter has been launched, and the latter is free to devise fresh schemes for another body of Directors to assist him in disposing of Should a promoter persist in harassing an intend- ing Director, the latter should intimate firmly that he intends to fully satisfy himself that everything is completely to his satisfaction before he allows a prospectus to be issued with his name thereon, and that he is determined the future regulations of the Company shall be carefully considered, so as to guard as much as possible against omissions or carelessly prepared rules, which may interfere hereafter with the prosperity of the Company. At all these preliminary meetings a solicitor should be present, to advise the intending Directors on the various legal andother points, of which there are always DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 9 many to be considered. Usually, the proposed solicitor to the Company is present, but in many instances it is desirable the Directors should be attended by another solicitor of their own selection, who acts solely on their behalf, previous to the promotion of the Company, and who retires after the allotment of shares has taken place. The intending Directors may, of course, stipu- late that the cost of their private solicitor be paid by the promoter. Should the Company be formed to take over and carry on an established business, the intending Directors should require the books to be examined by a Chartered Accountant, to be approved by them- selves. If his report be sufficiently satisfactory to warrant applications for capital from the public, a copy of the report should be embodied in the prospectus. If too long to be printed /;/ ex^e?iso, any proposed abbreviation should be submitted to the Chartered Accountant, so as to avoid the risk of his repudiating concurrence with the statement made as not being strictly accurate. In the case of an old-established business, the books of account should be examined for at least five years, and the result of each year's trading be clearly shown to the intending Directors, even though the results of the business for a shorter period be given in the prospectus. If the annual profits have decreased, it would undoubtedly be considered a fraud by the Courts \ lO THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. for this to be concealed by merely giving the total profits or the average profit of the years referred to in the prospectus. The intending Directors should not be satisfied with a report of a Chartered Accountant merely addressed to the vendor, still less with a profit and loss account or balance sheet merely endorsed with the name of the Chartered Accountant. Documents such as these may merely have been prepared by the Chartered Accountant for his client the vendor, and perhaps under special instructions, which might make them quite unreliable for the purpose of basing thereon calcuhitions as to the probable dividends to be paid by a Company formed to acquire the business. A Chartered Accountant would naturally disclaim any responsibility were a private document of this nature, prepared by him, made use of for a purpose wholly different to what was intended when it was issued by him, and intending Directors should require a report and set of accounts to be specially prepared for the purposes of the prospectus and for their own protection. When the proposed Directors meet to discuss the prospectus, each Director should take a note on his copy of the alterations made, keep the amended copy by him, and at subsequent meetings refer to it to see that the fresh proofs have been duly corrected in accordance with the alterations made at the previous DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. II meetings. It must be remembered that the Directors are liable for the correctness of every statement made in the prospectus, which is the document inviting the public to join in the proposed undertaking, and which has to be signed by every Director before being published. The expression "prospectus" means any prospectus, notice, circular, advertisement, or other invitation, offering to the public for subscription or purchase any shares or debentures of a company. Promoters are, of course, allowed to take a sanguine view in the prospectus, but no misstatement or concealment of any facts or circumstances should be permitted to appear, as it has been decided by an eminent Judge that the public ought to have the same opportunity of judging of everything which has a material bearing on the true character of the adventure as the promoters themselves possess. The prospectus must not merely state the truth as far as it goes, but should it conceal material facts the Directors run the risk of being themselves personally liable for the whole of the capital subscribed. Every fact stated in the prospectus should, as already stated, be closely inquired into by the proposed Directors ; they should ask for a proof of the correctness of the assertion, and even then it would be better for them to quote the authority than to take upon them- selves the responsibility of the assertion. For example, assuming a Company about to take over an established 12 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. business, a report on which had been prepared by a firm of Chartered Accountants, to the effect that it was making twenty per cent, profit, it would be absurd for the Directors to make the assertion themselves that tlie business was making- twenty per cent, profit. The prospectus would be just as strong- for the Directors to state that the Chartered Accountants said so, and. having- the report in their possession, they assert a fact, the correctness of which they can at any time prove. The late Vice-Chancellor Kindersley stated that, in issuing a prospectus holding out to the public the great advantages which will accrue to those who take shares. Directors ''are bound to state everything with strict and scrupulous accuracy, and not only to abstain from stating as fact that which is not so, but to omit no one fact within their knowledge the existence of which might in any degree affect the nature, or extent, or quality of the privileges and advantages which the prospectus holds out as inducements to take shares " [Nezv Brunswick and Canada Railways Co. v, Mugggridgc]. AVhen a Board of Directors knowingly made a representation to the public that they and their friends had subscribed a large portion of the capital, knowing well the fact was not so, they were fixed by the Court with a guilty knowledge of the misrepresentation. The following examples, taken from reports of cases in the Courts in which Directors were interested, will DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 1 3 suffice to show the care which should be exercised by Directors in connection with the issue of a prospectus:^ All the Directors of a Company approved a prospectus, issued by the Company, inviting subscrip- tions for the preference and debenture capital, and stating that the whole of the ordinary shares would be taken by the Directors. Directors who never took any ordinary shares, and whose names were not placed on the register of members as holders thereof, were held in the winding up of the Company to be liable as holders of the ordinary shares— not on the ground of estoppel, but because they had agreed to become Directors on the terms mentioned in the prospectus [In re Moore Brothers & Co.). The Directors of a Company issued debentures and shares as fully paid to a contractor in order that he might do certain necessary works, and in addition might pay certain creditors sums in excess of their just debts, and take up shares in the Company, and otherwise benefit the shareholders and Directors. It was held that the Directors were liable to return any benefit they had received, and were, except one who had not participated in the scheme, also liable to make good the excessive consideration and indemnify the Company against loss on the shares issued as paid up [London Trust Co, v. Mackenzie), The L. Co. was promoted and formed by the Directors of the L. Syndicate for the purpose of 14 THE director's HANDBOOK. purchasing part of the property of the Syndicate. The Directors of the Syndicate prepared and signed the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Com- pany, the Articles nominating them as Directors, and stating specifically that they were also the Directors of the Syndicate. They also prepared the Company's prospectus and purchase contract, and aihxed the seals of the Syndicate and of the Company to the latter. The Company's solicitor and secretary were also the same as those of the Syndicate. Two years after the date of the contract and the completion of the purchase the shareholders of the Company, believing that their property had been purchased at an over-value, and that there had been misrepresentation in the contract and prospectus, appointed an independent Board of Directors, who, after investigating the facts, and with the sanction of a general meeting of the shareholders, brought an action against the Syndicate and the Directors for rescission of the contract and damages, on the ground of mis- representation, misfeasance, breach of trust, and concealment of material facts, but not alleging fraud. From the date of the contract and down to, and also since, the commencement of the action, the Company had, first by its original Directors, and afterwards by its independent Board, carried on business and worked the property the subject of the contract. At the trial the action was dismissed. DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 1 5 On being taken to the Court of Appeal, Lord Justice Lindley, the Master of the Rolls, and Lord Justice Collins held that the Company was not entitled to rescission or damages, for (i) at the date of the contract the Company had, by its Memorandum and Articles, notice that its IDirectors were also the vendors or agents of the vendor Syndicate, and the mere fact that its Directors did not constitute an independent Board was not a sufficient ground for setting aside the contract; (2) there had been no misrepresentation made to, or any material fact con- cealed from, any of the persons who were members of the Company at the date of the contract, those persons being the Directors themselves; (3) although the contract and prospectus were, on the evidence, misleading in certain particulars, which would have entitled the Company at the time to repudiate the contract, yet through the subsequent alteration of the property, consequent on its being worked by the Company, the position of the parties had been so changed that they could not be restored to their original position ; and (4) the defendants, the Direc- tors, had not been guilty of such negligence or breach of trust as to render them liable in damages in law for the loss occasioned to the Company, or in equity to make good the loss. It was, however, held by Lord Justice Rigby (i) that, in the promotion of the Company, the preparation \ i6 THE director's HANDBOOK. and sealing of the contract, and the preparation and issue of the prospectus, the original Directors had, while acting as sole agents for the vendor Syndicate, constituted themselves sole fiduciary agents for the purchasing Company, and that the Company was therefore entitled to rescission (but accounting for the profits of its working) on the principle that no fiduciary agent can bind his principal by a sale to him of such agent's property where the principal has purchased without independent advice, and that the notice in the Memorandum and Articles of the double relation of its Directors was ineffectual to discharge them from the obligations involved in that principle; and (2) that the Company had not lost its right of rescission either (a) through delay — for time did not run during the domination of the original Directors, and the non-disclosure by them of material facts ; or [b] through alteration of the property, the alteration having been in effect the act of the vendor Syndicate by its Directors [Laotmas Nitrate Co. v. Lagunas Syndicate), A favourite device of promoters to obtain remunera- tion is to have themselves joined as part owners of a property, about to be sold to a Company, in which they are not really interested. Directors who know- ingly allow promoters to obtain remuneration by an arrangement of this nature can be held guilty of misfeasance [Bland's Case). DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 1 7 A subscriber of the Memorandum of Association of a Company limited by shares is (in the absence of any provision in the Articles of Association, or of an express agreement between him and the Company to the contrary) not liable to make any payment in respect of the shares for which he sub- scribes, except as and when calls are made upon him in accordance with the provisions of the Articles. If Directors issue other shares besides those which are taken by the subscribers of the Memorandum, there is nothing to prevent them from offering those shares on such terms as regards payment to the Company on application and allotment as they may think expedient. If, however. Directors require other applicants for shares to make payments on application and allot- ment, and issue their own shares for which they have subscribed the Memorandum without requiring any such 'payments to be made, and without dis- closing to the other shareholders this difference between their position and that of the Directors, they commit a breach of duty, even though in so doing they act without fraud, and in the belief that they are doing nothing wrong. Directors who so use their powers as to obtain benefits for themselves at the expense of the other shareholders, without informing them of the facts, cannot be allowed to retain those benefits, but must c i8 THE director's HANDBOOK. account for them to the Company, so that all the shareholders may participate in them [Alexander v. Automatic Telephtmc Co.). A misleading statement in a prospectus is an "untrue statement" within Section 3, Subsection (i), of "The Directors' Liability Act, 1890." The liability imposed by this section for any untrue statement in a prospectus is absolute, and is in no way affected by the consideration whether the statement is untrue in the sense in which it is used by those who issue the prospectus. Persons issuing- a prospectus con- taining an untrue statement can only escape liability under the statute by proving that they had "reason- able ground " for believing the statement to be true in fact \ Greet mood v. Leather- Shod Wheel Co.). Directors are often entrapped by a promoter to perform acts for the so-called benefit of the Company by promises which they ultimately find, to their cost, the promoter has no power to keep. For example, when a Director took shares for the purpose of enabling the Company to obtain registration, on the understanding that no calls should be made upon him, and the shares were subsequently forfeited to relieve him from liability, he was, when the Company went into liquidation, put on the list of contributories for the shares [Lo?idon and County Assurance^ ex parte Joiies). Where a Director had subscribed the Memorandum DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 1 9 of Association for 500 shares, but only 250 were allotted to him, an arrangement with his co-Directors, under which a quasi- surrender or forfeiture was made by a deed of release and indemnity, was ineffectual to relieve him from his liability [Hall's Case). Satisfactory proof that not only the capital pro- posed to be offered* for subscription, but also that the amount (if any) fixed by the Memorandum or Articles of Association, and named in the prospectus as the minimum subscription upon which the Directors will proceed to allotment, will be sufficient to float the Company, and to enable it to commence business on a sound financial basis, should be required by the proposed Directors when discussing the prospectus. They should also determine the class of shares into which the capital is to be divided. If any preference shares are to form part of the capital, all proposed to be issued should, as a rule, be offered for subscrip- tion, it being very undesirable any should be handed to a vendor as part of the purchase-money. This should be taken either entirely in ordinary or deferred shares, or partly in shares of this description and partly in cash. A person is not capable of being appointed a Director of a Company by the Articles of Association, and must not be named as a Director or proposed Director in any prospectus, unless before the regis- tration of the Articles, or the publication of the c 2 20 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. prospectus, as the case may be, he has by himself, or by his agent authorised in writing, signed and filed with the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies a consent in writing to act as a Director, and either signed the Memorandum of Association for a number of shares not less than his qualification (if any), or signed and filed with the Registrar a contract in writing to take from the Company and pay for his qualification shares (if any). In signing the Memorandum of Association the Director must write with his own hand the number of shares he agrees to take, but his address and occupa- tion may be written by another person. These regulations, however, do not apply to a Company registered before the passing of **The Companies Act, 1900" (8th August, 1900), or to a Company which does not issue any invitation to the public to subscribe to its shares, or to a prospectus issued by or on behalf of a Company after the expiration of one year from the date at which the Company is entitled to commence business. Every Director who is by the regulations of his Company required to hold a specified share qualification and who is not qualified is required to obtain his qualification within two months after his appointment, or such shorter time as may be fixed by the regulations of the Company, and his ofiice of Director is vacated should he not do so. It is also vacated if, after the expiration of the two months or the shorter period DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OE SHARES. 2 1 (if any) fixed by the regulations, he ceases at any time to hold his qualification. A Director thus vacating office is incapable of being reappointed a Director until he has obtained his qualification. If any unqualified person acts as Director of a Company he is liable to pay to the Company the sum of five pounds for every day during w^hich he so acts. Occasionally a small proportion of the capital of a Company is offered for subscription amongst those who assist in the promotion, conferring on its holders the privilege of receiving a large proportion of the profits after the other shareholders have received a substantial dividend. These are known as " Founders' Shares,'' and there is not the slightest objection to a proposed Director subscribing for some of these shares. In order to avoid disputes, which are likely to arise on the division of profits, it is advisable, when shares of this description are issued, for a clause to be inserted in the Articles of Association that the profits divisible among the holders of the Founders' Shares are to be settled by the periodical accounts certified by the Auditors of the Company. In order to influence capital, promoters sometimes announce in a prospectus that dividends are guaranteed at a certain rate for a certain period. Directors whose 9 O THE UIKKCTOK'S HANDBOOK. names appear on a prospectus bearing a statement to this effect are clearly bound to require that a sum sufficient to pay these dividends is invested in Consols, or in one of the securities in which trustees are allowed to invest, in such a manner as to be under their control should the money be required. Under no circumstances should Directors allow a prospectus to be issued stating that dividends are guaranteed if the only security be the lodgment of vendors' shares. This has frequently happened and proved a tempting bait to investors; although it is apparent that, should there be occasion to call upon the guarantor, the shares deposited as security must, for this reason alone, be so seriously depreciated as to have little, if any, market value. Every prospectus issued must be dated, which date is, subject to the contrary being proved, taken as the date of publication of the prospectus. One copy of every prospectus issued must be signed by every person who is named therein as a Director or proposed Director, or by his agent, duly authorised by him in writing, and this copy of the prospectus must be filed with the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies on or before the date of its publication. The prospectus must not be issued until this copy has been filed, and every prospectus must state on its face that it has been so filed. Every prospectus issued by or on behalf of a Company, or by or on behalf of any person who is DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 23 or has been engaged or interested in the formation of the Company, must state — {a) The contents of the Memorandum of Associa- tion, with the names, descriptions and addresses of the signatories, and the number of shares subscribed for by them respectively; and the number of founders' or management shares, if any, and the nature and extent of the interest of the holders in the property and profits of the Company ; id) The number of shares, if any, fixed by the Articles of Association as the qualification of a Director, and any provision in the Articles of Association as to the remuneration of the Directors ; [c) The names, descriptions, and addresses of the Directors or proposed Directors ; (d) The minimum subscription on which the Directors may proceed to allotment, and the amount payable on application and allotment on each share ; and, in the case of a second or subsequent offer of shares, the amount offered for subscription on each previous allot- ment, and the amount actually allotted ; and the amount, if any, paid on such shares ; (c) The number and amount of shares and deben- tures issued, or agreed to be issued, as fully or partly paid up otherwise than in cash, and 24 THE DIRECTOR'S HA.NDBOOK. in the latter case the extent to which they are so paid up, and in either case the consideration for which such shares or debentures have been issued or are proposed or intended to be issued ; (/) The names and addresses of the vendors of any property purchased or acquired by the Com- pany, or proposed so to be purchased or acquired, which is to be paid for wholly or partly out of the proceeds of the issue offered for subscription by the prospectus, or the purchase or acquisition of which has not been completed at the date of publication of the prospectus, and the amount payable in cash, shares, or debentures to the vendor, and where there is more than one separate vendor, or the Company is a sub-purchaser, the amount so payable to each vendor ; [o-) The amount (if any) paid or payable as purchase money in cash, shares, or debentures of any such property as aforesaid, specifying- the amount payable for goodwill ; (//) The amount (if any) paid or payable as com- mission for subscribing or agreeing to sub- scribe, or procuring or agreeing to procure subscriptions, for any shares in the Company, or the rate of any such commission ; [t) The amount or estimated amount of preliminary expenses ; DUTIES PRIOR TO TPIE ALLOTMENT OF SHARKS. 25 (/) The amount paid or intended to be paid to any promoter and the consideration for any such payment ; {k) The dates of and parties to every material contract and a reasonable time and place at which any material contract or a copy thereof may be inspected : Provided that this require- ment shall not apply to a contract entered into in the ordinary course of the business carried on or intended to be carried on by the Company, or to any contract entered into more than three years before the date of publication of the prospectus ; (/j The names and addresses of the Auditors (if any) of the Company. {m) Full particulars of the nature and extent of the interest (if any) of every Director in the promotion of or in the property proposed to be acquired by the Company, with a statement of all sums paid or agreed to be paid to him in cash or shares by any person either to qualify him as a Director or otherwise for services rendered by him in connection with the formation of the Company. These regulations do not apply to a circular or notice inviting the existing shareholders or debenture holders of a Company to subscribe for further shares or debentures. 26 THE DIRECTOR S HANDBOOK. The requirements also as to the Memorandum of Association, and the qualification, remuneration, and interest of Directors, the names, descriptions, and addresses of Directors or proposed Directors, and the amount or estimated amount of preliminary expenses do not apply in the case of a prospectus published more than a year after the date at which the Company is entitled to commence business, while in the case of a prospectus published more than one year after the date at which the Compiiny is entitled to commence business the obligation to disclose all material contracts is limited to a period of two years immediately pre-" ceding the publication of the prospectus. The terms of any contract referred to in the prospectus meiy not be varied prior to the statutory meeting, except subject to the approval of the statutory meeting. The Memorandum of Association should be carefully perused. This contains the name of the Company, the part of the United Kingdom in which its registered office is to be situated, and the objects for which it is to be established. It is very desirable that this last part should be made as full and ample as possible, and it should include powers to transact business not intended by the Company at its first commencement, but which might possibly be thought desirable hereafter, as a Company has never any power to transact business not provided for in its DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 27 Memorandum, and the fullest sanction given by the shareholders will not make valid any transaction outside the powers of the Company [Attoiiiey-General V. Great Easter 71 Railway Co.). Directors who undertake any business outside the powers conferred by the Memorandum of Association may be held personally liable for any loss the Company may sustain. The Memorandum of Association is, in fact, the charter of the Company, and defines the limitation of its powers, but anything which is fairly incidental to the Company's objects, as defined, is not, unless ex- pressly prohibited, held as ultri vires. The Articles of Association cannot modify or alter any condition, expressed or implied, in the Memorandum, yet, being contemporaneous documents, they are, for the purposes of construction, to be read together, and the Articles may serve to explain that which is ambiguous in the Memorandum [London Financial Association v. Kclk). The Articles of Association should also be gone carefully through. These and the Memorandum are, of course, always drawn by the Solicitors, and usually settled by Counsel, but there are several clauses especially affecting the Directors, which should be considered by them. For example, the qualification is usually fixed by the Articles, and an intending Director must, of course, take care that the qualification is not in excess of the sum he is prepared to invest in zS THE DIRECTOR S HANDBOOK. the Company. It is not necessary that the qualification of future Directors should be the same as that of the first, and, as few people care to invest much money in a new Company, it is very usual that the first Directors should hav^e a lower qualification than those who are afterwards elected to the Board. Another point to be considered is the remuneration to be paid to the Directors. In settling the amount, due regard must be had to the proposed capital of the Company, and the amount of business it is considered will be transacted, as a small Company, with ;£5o,ooo capital, could not be expected to be able to pay so heavy a remuneration to its Directors as a Company employing ^'r, 000,000. A very desirable way of remunerating the Directors is to give them a fixed minimum remuneration, such to be increased according to the dividends paid to the shareholders. For example, the Articles might contain a provision that the minimum remuneration for the Board should be ^^500, ^750, or ^1,000, with an additional £250 or ^'500 for each one per cent, paid to the shareholders lifter they had received a five per cent, dividend. Directors should be careful that the Articles are not so worded that they are precluded from earning any remuneration except for each completed year. It has been held that where the Articles allowed remuneration at so much for each year, nothing could be allowed Directors except for services for a full year, and that f DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 29 there could not be any apportionment [Salton v. New Bees ion Cycle Co.). It is also quite legitimate for the Articles of Association to contain a clause that the first Directors shall remain in office for two or three years, and then for one-third in number to retire by rotation at the annual general meetings after that date. Very frequently, when the transactions of a Com- pany have not been satisfactory, an attempt is made at the annual meetings to remove the Directors. In the heat of discussion many names are suggested, and, perhaps, those shareholders who have made the greatest noise, but who may not have any business capcicities, are elected to fill the vacancies. To provide against this result — which is so often destructive to a Company, as it frequently removes, perhaps, the most useful members of the Board — it is desirable a clause should be inserted in the Articles of Association that no Director can be elected at an annual meeting, with the exception of a retiring Director, unless his name has been sent in to the secretary, with an intimation of his willingness to act, if elected, a fortnight before the meeting. It is also desirable there should be a clause in the Articles of Association that the Auditors shall be Fellows or Associates of the Institute of Chartered Accountants, and that the holding of shares in the Company shall disqualify anyone for this position, 30 THF. DIRKCTOR'S HANDBOOK. it being very necessary an Auditor shall be strictly impartial. If it is intended that commission shall be paid to persons for subscribing or agreeing to procure sub- scriptions for shares, the payment of the commission, and the amount or rate per cent, of the commission, must be authorised by the Articles. In approving the amount inserted in the draft Articles, the proposed Directors must satisfy themselves that it is not ex- cessive, and that this addition to the real purchase- money will not interfere with the Company paying what they may consider should be the lowest dividend foreshadowed by the prospectus. The Articles of Association are a contract only as between the members inter se in respect of their rights as shareholders, and it is, therefore, useless to insert clauses in them for the protection of third parties, as the latter would have no right to enforce performance of such acts. For example, if the Articles contain a clause that a certain person shall be employed in a particular appointment, there is no contract with him for breach of which he can successfully sue. If the Articles provide that the Company shall pay preliminary expenses, this does not give promoters a right of action against the Company for their payment. Articles which provided that all the original shares should be considered as fully paid-up shares did not DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMEN 1 OF SHARES. 31 protect the holders of these shares from being liable for calls [Dent's Case). Having settled the Memorandum and Articles ot Association and the prospectus, it will then have to be determined as to how the Company is to be brought out. As a rule, the expenses are borne by the promoters, who, in return for their risk of capital and time, usually receive a substantial sum. This is only reasonable, as those who make it a business to promote Companies find that only a certain proportion of them float, and, therefore, those which are successfully launched must pay for the unsuccessful attempts of the same promoters. There are many ways of arranging this sum, the most satisfactory being for the promoter to receive a fixed percentage, either on the nominal capital of the Company or on the amount subscribed. It is, as already stated, the duty of the Director to see that this amount is not excessive, or such as to cripple the resources of the Company. It is required by the law that the whole amount to be paid shall be distinctly set forth in the prospectus, also that the Directors are not aware of any sums paid to the promoter from any other source except that stated on the prospectus. Upon any offer of shares for public subscription it has been made lawful by "The Companies Act, 1900," for a Company to pay a commission to any person in consideration of his subscribing or agreeing to subscribe, whether absolutely or conditionally, for any 32 THE director's HANDBOOK. shares in the Company, or procuring or agreeing to procure subscriptions, whether absolute or conditional, for any shares in the Company, if the payment of the commission and the amount or rate per cent, of the commission paid or agreed to be paid are respectively authorised by the Articles of Association, and disclosed in the prospectus, and the commission paid or agreed to be paid does not exceed the amount or rate so authorised. With these exceptions a Company may not apply any of its shares or capital money either directly, or indirectly in payment of any commission, discount or allowance to any person in consideration of his subscribing or agreeing to subscribe, whether absolutely or conditionally, for any shares of the Company, or procuring or agreeing to procure subscriptions, whether absolute or conditional, for any shares in the Company, whether the shares or money be so applied by being added to the purchase money of any property acquired by the Company, or to the contract price of any work to be executed for the Company, or the money be paid out of the nominal purchase money or contract price, or otherwise. A Company may, however, pay such brokerage as, prior to the passing of ** The Companies Act, 1900," it had been lawful for a Company to pay. This is the proper scale of commission for a broker's services, as laid down in Metropolitan Association v. Scrimgeour, I DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. ^ When part of the capital of a Company consists of founders' shares it is usual for the preliminary expenses to be paid by the founders. The Company thus starts clear of fictitious assets accounts, which have to be gradually liquidated during the early years of a Company's existence, and which form such an unsatisfactory item in the balance sheets until they are extinguished. There is no objection to a Director subscribing for founders' shares, but he should not be a party to any underwriting arrangements the promoter may have made for securing the capital. *' The Companies Act, 1900," enacts that the number of founders' or manage- ment shares, and the nature and extent of the interest of the holders in the property and profits of the Company, must be stated in the prospectus. It is also very desirable, in the interests of the Directors, that, before allowing the prospectus to be issued, they should receive an indemnity from all persons whom they know to have been employed by the promoter in the preliminary stages, otherwise it is possible a claim may be made against them in the event of the Company not floating. Very frequently the Directors of the Company are asked by the promoter to subscribe to the Memorandum of Association for the number of shares they intend to take; this they should be very careful about before acceding to, as, once registered, the Company is formed, 34 THE DIRFXTOR'S HANDBOOK. and it may be put into liquidation before the allot- ment takes place, in which case claims might be made upon the signatories to pay the expenses incurred by the promoter. In nearly every Company a Director is required by the Articles of Association to hold a minimum number of shares as a qualification for the office, and he must, in the case of a new Company, either sign the Memorandum of Association for a number of shares not less than his qualification or sign and file with the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies a contract in writing to take from the Company and pay for his qualification shares. A direction in Articles of Association, or in an Act of Parliament, that a Director must, as his quali- fication, hold shares "in his own right" does not mean that he must be personally and beneficially interested in the shares {Pulbrook v. Richmond Consoli- dated Mining Co.), Should a Director intend to be interested in the promotion, or wish to receive any commission on influencing capital, he must be careful that full par- ticulars of the nature and extent of his interest be stated in the prospectus. This statement must contain all sums paid or agreed to be paid to him in cash or shares by any person, either to qualify him as a Director or otherwise for services rendered by him in connection with the formation of the Company. \ \ DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 35 Should he not wish them to be known, it is advisable he should not join the Board until after the allotment of shares, when he can be elected either by the Board or by the shareholders at the statutory meeting according to the powers contained in the Articles as to election of Directors. A Director, or any other person who signs the Memorandum of Association, contracts to become a shareholder in repect of that number of shares, and is absolutely bound to take them from the Company and pay the consideration for the same. It will not, therefore, do for him to buy the shares from any other person. So long as there are shares that can be allotted to him, he is liable to be called upon to fulfil that obligation ; but should no allotment have been made to him, and all the shares have been allotted to other persons, he is then no longer liable. Should a subscriber to the Memorandum wish to be rid of his liability, he should take the shares and arrange for their immediate transfer. The subscribers are at liberty, liowever, to withdraw at any time before the Company has been registered. Before the prospectus is issued a banking account should be opened, and in their own interests the Directors should require the form of application for shares to be so worded that the moneys forwarded with the applications are only to be received by the D 2 36 THE DIRFXTOR'S HANDBOOK. bankers, so that, when once they are lodged there, they can only be got out by means of cheques signed by the Directors, otherwise the Directors run the risk of being made responsible for money received at the office of the Company and wrongly appropriated. The production of the certificate of the Company's incorporation, given by the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies, should be required by the Board before allowing the prospectus to be issued. This certificate is conclusive evidence that all the requisitions of the Companies Act in respect of registration, and ot matters precedent and incidental thereto, have been complied with. The Registrar may accept a statutory declaration by a person named in the Articles of Association as a Director of compliance with all or any of the requi- sitions of the Companies Act as sufficient evidence on which to issue his certificate. Any Director asked to make such a declaration by a promoter should invariably refuse to do so, and either require the solicitor to undertake the responsibility or leave the promoter to obtain the certificate by satisfying the Registrar in some other way. Should an intending Director, after attending preliminary meetings, resolve to decline a seat at the Board, he should intimate his intention to the other proposed Directors, the solicitors, and the promoter, \ \ DUTIES PRIOR TO THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 57 in writing, and forbid his name being included in the prospectus or in any document issued. A person whose name is wrongly included in a prospectus as a Director is entitled to be indemnified by the person who wrongfully inserted his name against any damages or costs incurred by reason of this wrongful insertion. Should the Directors after the issue of a pro- spectus discover that it contains a mistake, it is their duty to call the attention of the subscribers to this in the clearest manner, and it is not sufficient to issue a new prospectus in which the facts are correctly stated (Aruison v. Smith). ,8 THE director's HANDBOOK. THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 39 \ CHAPTER II. THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. THE Directors should meet for the purpose of allotting the shares as soon as the subscription list is closed, for, as applicants for shares are at liberty to withdraw their application at any time previous to the allotment, the Company might lose the benefit of a certain amount of c^ipital, should the allotment be unduly delayed. The shares should be allotted strictly on the terms contained in the prospectus, for, if new terms or con- ditions are introduced, there will be no contract. Unless the Articles of Association of a Company authorise the Directors to delegate the power of allotting shares to a Committee, shares should only be allotted at a Board meeting at which is present the requisite quorum {^Harris s Case), The quorum is usually settled by the Articles of Association, but is sometimes fixed by the Directors, as explained hereafter. In a case where the Articles excluded Table "A," provided that the shares should be allotted by the Directors, that the Directors should not be more than ten nor less than three, that the first Directors should be appointed by the subscribers to the Memorandum, and that the Directors might determine the quorum, the subscribers met and appointed four persons Directors. Two days afterwards the first meeting of Directors was held, at which two only were present. No suflftcient notice of this meeting had been given to all the Directors. These two Directors present resolved that two Directors should form a quorum, and then pro- ceeded to allot shares. The Court of Appeal decided the two Directors had no power to appoint themselves a quorum, and that the allotment was invalid. "The Companies Act, 1900," imposed the following restrictions as regards the first allotment of shares of a Company : — The Directors may not allot any of the share capital of a Company offered for public subscription unless the following conditions have been complied with : — [a) The amount (if any) fixed by the Memorandum or Articles of Association and named in the prospectus as the minimum subscription upon which the Directors may proceed to allot- ment ; or [b) If no amount is so fixed and named, then the whole amount of the share capital so offered for subscription has been subscribed, and the sum payable on 40 THE director's HANDBOOK. THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 41 application for the amount so fixed and named, or for the whole amount offered for subscription, has been paid to and received by the Company. The amount so fixed and named, and the whole amount referred to, has to be reckoned exclusively of any amount payable otherwise than in cash. This amount is referred to in "The Companies Act, 1900," as the "minimum subscription." The amount payable on application on each share must be at least five per cent, of the nominal amount of the share. Should the above conditions not have been com- plied with on the expiration of forty days after the first issue of the prospectus, all money received from applicants for shares has to be immediately repaid to the applicants, but without any interest, and if any of the application money is not repaid within forty-eight days after the issue of the prospectus, the Directors of the Company are jointly and severally liable to repay the money with interest at the rate of five per cent, per annum. Any condition requiring or binding an applicant for shares to waive compliance with these requirements is void. An allotment made by a Company to an applicant for shares in contravention of the restrictions imposed by the Act of 1900 is voidable, at the instance of the tj t\ applicant, within a month after the holding ot the statutory meeting of the Company but not later. It is voidable even should the Company be in course of being wound up. Should any Director knowingly contravene, or per- mit or even authorise the contravention of, any of the provisions of ''The Companies xAct, 1900," with respect to allotment, he is liable to compensate the Company and the allottees respectively for any loss, damages, or costs which the Company or the allottees may have sustained or incurred thereby. Proceedings to recover may not be commenced after the expiration of two years from the date of allotment. It is consequently most important that, when meeting to consider the advisability of proceeding to allotment, Directors should satisfy themselves that all the above conditions have been complied with, and for this purpose they should require a report from their Solicitor, and should also, previous to the meeting, instruct the Auditors, or some other Chartered Accountants, to examine the Bankers' Pass Book with the applications for shares, and report to the Board meeting whether the " minimum subscription " has been reached. In connection with the allotment, as in other matters, Directors must remember that they are trustees for the Company, and must allot the shares for the benefit of the Company. When shares, therefore, are at a premium, the Directors must not allot them to 42 THE DIRFXTOR'S HANDBOOK. THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 43 If II themselves or to their friends but must obtain the premium for the company [Parker v. McKeii^ia). The applications for shares, when received from the bankers, should be filed, and the particulars entered in a book, usually called the "Application for Shares and Allotment Book." As great complications, re- sulting in law suits, have frequently arisen through this book not having been properly prepared, it is desirable to instruct a Chartered Accountant to design one, and to hand him the applications for shares, together with the Bankers' Pass Book, so that the particulars may be properly entered. When the Board meet to allot the shares, this book should be placed before them, the number of shares allotted to each applicant should be entered by the Chairman in the column provided for that purpose, and then the Chartered Accountant or the Secretary, if one has already been appointed, can send out the letters of allotment to the successful applicants, and the letters of regret to those to whom the Directors have not made any allotment. The particulars of the postage of these notices should be duly entered in the "Application for Shares and Allotment Book." Before proceeding to the allotment, the Directors should ask to be shown any letters that may have been received from applicants, so as to avoid allotting shares to any who may have withdrawn their appli- cations, or too many shares to those who may have written requesting a smaller number of shares than that contained in the formal application. If any of the applications for shares contain conditions which the Directors are not willing to, or cannot, comply with, they should not make an allot- ment in respect of these applications, as, unless the conditions are satisfied, the allotment would not be binding on the applicant. Notwithstanding the fact that the Articles of Association and the prospectus state the minimum sum on which the Directors may proceed to an allot- ment, it is absolutely in the power of the Directors, when meeting to consider the proposed allotment, to determine whether, although they may have obtained the minimum subscription, they shall or shall not allot. In the ev^ent of the whole capital offered for subscription not being taken up, the Directors should carefully consider as to whether the amount of the capital subscribed is sufficient to justify them in proceeding to an allotment. It is quite possible that, from criticisms they may have read on the prospectus when published, or from information obtained from any reliable source, the Directors may have reason to doubt the correctness of the statements placed before them when the amount of " the minimum subscription " was fixed. In any case, should the Directors have the slightest doubt on the subject, they should have due regard to their moral obligations, as it would be 44 THE director's HANDBOOK. THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 45 distinctly improper for any Director to sanction an allotment of shares unless he is fully satisfied that the capital subscribed is sufficient to carry out either all the objects for which the Company was registered, or a sufficient number of them to yield a profitable return to the shareholders on their capital. The Directors should not allow themselves to be influenced in any way by representations made to them by the promoter, that unless they proceed to an allotment the money expended by him will be thrown away, or by promises that after the first capital is taken up it will be easier to obtain a further amount. The Directors' duty should be exercised entirely in the interest of those who have subscribed for the shares, and they should be guided by that alone. For the purpose of coming to a decision a proper statement should be drawn up and placed before the Board, showing on one side the amount of capital subscribed, distinguishing the amount paid up and the amount uncalled, having due regard to the dates on which calls can be made, as, ot course, if the Articles state that the calls can only be made at certain interv^ds, these dates and amounts should be carefully taken into consideration. On the other side should be put the amount proposed to be paid to the promoters or other persons, as authorised by Section lo of "The Companies Act, 1900," and all other estimated payments, present or future, and if the Directors do not see their way to punctually discharge the liabilities which would be binding on the Company after the allotment, and leave a sufficient working capital, they should absolutely decline to allot. After arriving at this decision, the Directors should be careful to arrange for the return of the money paid with the applications to the proper owners. P^or this purpose two at least of the Directors, or the number prescribed by the Articles for the signing of cheques, should attend at the Company's bankers', register their signatures, obtain the necessary number of cheques, and send them to each applicant. The amount returned must be the full amount deposited, without deduction of any kind for expenses ; these must be borne entirely by the promoter. The Directors who attend at the bank should take the opportunity of informing the bankers of the failure of the scheme, instruct them not to receive any more applications for shares or deposits, and, when the cheques issued to the applicants have been honoured, to close the account. Unless the proposed Directors of an inchoate Company have been exceedingly careful, they are liable to annoyances, and even pecuniary liability, after the return of the subscriptions. The printers and other tradesmen employed by the promoter are frequently his personal friends, and, to oblige him, will perhaps send 46 THE director's HANDBOOK. THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 47 |i i in their accounts to those whose names were on the prospectus as Directors, demanding payment, and threatening legal proceedings unless their claims are settled. Occasionally writs are issued, and those attacked have no option but, at their own expense, to instruct their solicitors to defend them ; but, as a rule, the promoter and his friends, when they find their threats are treated with contempt, and the proposed Directors have been too careful to incur a legal liability, settle the accounts among themselves, and the intended members of the Board hear no more of the unsuccessful project. An application for shares, followed by a letter of allotment or other communication from the Company that an allotment has been made, constitutes a contract from which neither the applicant nor the Company may withdraw. The contract, however, is not completed, and, therefore, not binding, should any terms or conditions be introduced into the letter of allotment differing from the terms of the prospectus or the form of application, and in such a case the applicant may withdraw {Barrett's Case). The printed form of application issued with a prospectus usually contains words giving the Directors the option of allotting a less number of shares to the applicant than he may apply for. In the absence of such words the allotment of a less number of shares than applied for would not constitute a binding contract, and the applicant would be at liberty to withdraw {Ex parte Roberts). Where an applicant for shares in a Railway Company received a letter of allotment marked "Not transferable," it was held by the Court there was a new term imported and therefore was no contract [Duke V. Andreivs), Letters of allotment must bear an impressed stamp of one penny if the shares do not exceed the nominal value of five pounds, and an impressed stamp of sixpence if they exceed that nominal value. Any Director who executes, grants, issues, or delivers out any document chargeable with duty, including a letter of allotment, before the same is duly stamped, incurs by "The Stamp Act, 1891," a fine of twenty pounds. The letters of allotment should be sent out as soon as possible after the allotment has taken place, as, until the allotment has been communicated to the applicant, the contract is not complete. In a case where a person applied in writing for shares w^hich were allotted to him by the Directors, and after the allotment, but before it was communicated to him, he withdrew the application, the Court decided he was not a shareholder, as he had never become bound by a completed contract to take the shares. An allotment of shares to an applicant, and the li 48 THE director's HANDBOOK. L entry of his name on the Register of Members in respect of these shares, is not sufficient to bind him. It is not his duty to search the register to see whether the allotment has been made or not. It is not necessary he should be informed of the allotment in writing, but there must be in writing, or verbally, or by conduct, something to show the applicant that the Company have responded to his offer to take shares. The withdrawal also may be made orally, and need not necessarily be in writing [Wtlson's Case). Notice of withdrawal may be given orally to a clerk in the registered office of the Company, should the secretary be absent [Truman's Case). It is not necessary that allotment be made of all the shares offered for subscription at the same Board meeting. So long as any shares are unissued the Directors may entertain further applications and make fresh allotments from time to time. In a case where a Director received no notice of allotment, but his name was advertised as a Director, and he attended a meeting of Directors, he was held by the Court to be a contributory in respect of the shares, the Company having gone into liquidation. If the Directors send out unstamped letters of allotment, they should, on discovering the mistake, at once send out others in their place properly stamped. In the meantime the unstamped letter is sufficient to complete the contract and bind the allottee, although THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 49 he may have repudiated his shares between the dates of receipt of the unstamped and stamped letters of allotment {\Vh?tley Partners^. Directors should not under any circumstances know- ingly allot shares to minors, as a minor can at any time before or upon attaining full age repudiate the transaction and require the amounts paid to be refunded [Hamiltoti v. Vaughafi Sherrin Co.), Where a married woman is an applicant for shares it is prudent for the Directors to require her to pay up the shares in full before allotment or that her husband shall become a joint holder. I 50 tup: director's handbook. DUTIES AFTER THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 51 CHAPTER III. DUTIES AFTER THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. AFTER the allotment of shares has taken place, the Directors should satisfy themselves that the name of the Company is painted up at the front door of the building in which the offices are situated, and also outside the office door. The address of the offices is also required to be registered at Somerset House, and in the event of a Director wilfully authorising this not being done he is liable to a penalty not exceeding five pounds. A seal should also be prepared, having the name of the Company engraved in legible char^icters thereon, and all bills of exchange, promissory notes, indorse- ments, cheques, and orders for money or for goods, purporting to be signed for or on behalf of the Company, and all bills of parcels, invoices, receipts, and letters of credit, must bear the name of the Company in legible characters, as must also all notices, advertise- ments, and other official publications. Any Director authorising any of these things to be issued where the name of the Company is not mentioned is liable to a penalty of ;£50> and is also personally liable to the holder of any bill of exchange, promissory note, cheque, or order for money, or for goods to the extent of the amount not paid by the Company. The Directors of a Company were held personally liable for the amount of a bill of exchange accepted by them as Directors of the Company because, although the word " Limited " appeared in the bill in one place, the name of the Company was not correctly given in either the draft or the acceptance [Atkins v. IVardlc). Directors have also been held personally liable where a bill of exchange contained more than the correct name {Nass(m Steam Press v, Tyler), Within one month after the allotment of shares every Company is required to file with the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies — [a) A return of the allotments, stating the number and nominal amount of the shares comprised in the allotment, the names, addresses, and description of the allottees, and the amount if any) paid, or due and payable, on each share. [b] In the case of shares allotted in whole or in part for a consideration other than cash, a contract in writing constituting the title of the allottee to such allotment, together with any contract of sale, or for services, or other con- sideration in respect of which such allotment was made, such contracts being duly stamped, and a return stating the number and nominal E 2 52 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. amount of shares so allotted, the extent to which they are to be treated as paid up, and the consideration for which they have been allotted. If default is made in complying with these require- ments, every Director of the Company who is knowingly a party to the default is liable to a fine not exceeding ^50 for every day during which the default continues. In the meantime the Solicitor should be instructed to prepare a form of share certificate, which should then be submitted to the Committee of the Stock Exchange, should a special settling-day be desired. When the certificates have been printed, one should be written out for each member, signed by two of the Directors and Secretary, or as specially prescribed by the Articles of Association, and sealed with the Company's seal. A notice should then be sent to each member, informing him his certificate is ready, and that it will be forwarded to him on receipt by the Company of the letter of allotment and bankers- receipts. These, when returned to the office, should be preserved. Should there be more than one class of share, it is desirable that the certificates should differ in appearance, either in colour or size. It also desirable to print on the certificate the respective rights of the holders of the different classes of shares, also the amount paid up on each share. \ l\ DUTIES AFTER THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 53 Until the Directors are satisfied that the Secretary- is fully acquainted with his duties, including a know- ledge of the requirements of the Acts of Parliament relating to Companies, they should satisfy themselves that the latter have been complied with, and that the other arrangements as above indicated are carried out in a business-like way. It is of great importance that the books of a new Company should be opened in a proper manner, and it is now the usual custom to instruct a Chartered Accountant to do this. The fee will, as a rule, be saved very early in the Company's existence, more especially where many transactions have to be recorded, as, if the books are kept on a bad system, a great amount of unnecessary detail will be found in the books, necessitating the maintenance of a larger staff than really necessary. The Articles of Association of nearly all Companies prescribe that the Directors shall cause true accounts to be kept of all sums received and expended by the Company, and of the credits and liabilities of the Company, and there is a special clause in Table *' A " (Sec. 78) directing this to be done. Even without these clauses it is absolutely necessary the books should be properly kept and written up to date, and for this purpose it is now the usual practice for the Directors to in.struct the Auditors, or some other Chartered Accountant, to supervise the book-keeping department 54 TKE director's HANDBOOK. and report to them from time to time as to the condition in which the accounts are kept. This remark applies to both the statistical and financial books, the former consisting, as a rule> of books prescribed by the Acts of Parliament, and which it is the duty of a Director to see are properly kept up. Every Company registered under the Act of 1862 is required to keep in one or more books a register of its members, containing the following particulars:— (i) The names, addresses, and occupations (if any) of the members, with the addition, in the case of a Company having a capital divided into shares, of a statement of the shares held by each member, distinguishing each share by its number, and the amount paid or agreed to be considered as paid on the shares of each member. (2) The date at which the name of any person was entered in the register as a member. (3) The date at which any person ceased to be a member. A Director knowingly and wilfully authorising a contravention of the section of the Act containing this provision is liable to a penalty not exceeding five pounds for every day during default. A Register of Mortgages is also required to be kept, in which is to be entered all mortgages and charges >', DUTIES AFTER THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 55 specifically affecting the property of the Company, together with a short description of the property, the amount of charge created, and the names of the mortgagees or persons entitled to such charge. Directors wilfully authorising the omission of an entry of any property mortgaged or charged will incur a penalty not exceeding fifty pounds. Every mortgage or charge created by a Company after the ist January, 1901, including those created for the purpose of securing an issue of debentures, has to be registered with the Registrar of Joint Stock Com- panies, who is required to keep, with respect to each Company, a register of all such mortgages and charges. A certificate signed by the Registrar of each regis- tration is forwarded to each Company, and Directors must be particular that a copy of this certificate is endorsed on every debenture or certificate of debenture stock which is issued by the Company, and the payment of which is secured by the mortgage or charge so registered. If any Director or other person knowingly authorises or permits the delivery of any debenture or certificate of debenture stock required by "The Companies Act, 1900," to be registered, without a copy of the certificate of the Registrar being endorsed upon it, he is, without prejudice to any other liability, liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding one hundred pounds. 56 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. Every Company is required to k(M'p a copy of every instrument creating- any mortgag-e or charge requiring registration under "The Companies Act, looo/' at the registered office of the Company. Each copy is to be open to inspection by the shareholders and creditors on piiyment of a fee, not to exceed a shilling, for each inspection. In the case of a series of uniform deben- tures, a copy of one debenture satisfies this requirement. After the allotment of shares has taken place, the Company should take formed possession of all the property assigned to it, and the Directors should see that it is under their control. In appointing the officials, the Directors should be careful to ascertain, before entering into any agreements, that they are selecting the best men they can obtain for the special position they are to occupy, halving regard, of course, to the salary paid. Frequently Directors look upon appointments of this nature as a perquisite for their connections and friends. If qualified persons are nominated there can be no objection to this, as Directors have a right to surround themselves with persons in whom they have confidence; but it is clearly the duty of every Director to see that the interests of the shareholders are not injured by appointments being conferred on incom- petent persons merely to oblige a brother Director. The Secretary and Manager should both be persons of experience, and have had special training ' DUTIES AFTER THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 57 for their duty. A Manager is always to be preferred to a Managing Director; in fact, the latter is, as a rule, a most undesirable official, as the staff of a ('ompany should be the servants of the Directors, who should be free to discuss their conduct at a Board meeting. A Managing Director has a right to sit at the Board, and cannot be required to leave the room ; hence any question affecting his conduct or capacity cannot be discussed except in his presence — a most awkward proceeding, and one frequently shirked. It often happens, therefore, that, owing to a natural disinclination of a Board to discuss a matter personally affecting one of their body, many Companies have been ruined through an incompetent Managing Director being retained in office. Frequently, in order to secure the services of an efficient man, arrangements are entered into by which he is guaranteed employment for a certain number of years at a fixed salary. Great care should be taken to ascertain the antecedents of any person proposed to be engaged on terms of this nature, as, of course, a contract can only be broken through absolute misconduct, or at an expense to the Company in the shape of compensation. A Company is not allowed to commence any business or exercise any borrowing powers unless — (a) Shares held subject to the payment of the 58 THE DIKKCTUR'S HANDBOOK. DUTIES AFTER THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 59 whole amount thereof in cash have been allotted to an amount not less in the whole than the minimum subscription. [b] Every Director of the Company has paid to the Company on each of the shares taken or con- tracted to be taken by him, and for which he is liable to pay in cash, a proportion equal to the proportion payable on application and allotment on the shares offered for public subscription. {c) There has been filed with the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies a statutory declaration, by the Secretary or one of the Directors, in the form prescribed by the Board of Trade, that these conditions have been complied with. As soon as this statutory declaration has been filed, the Registrar will issue a certificate that the Company is entitled to commence business. If any Company commences business or exercises borrowing powers before these conditions have been fulfilled, every Director or other person who is responsible for the contravention is, without prejudice to any other liability, liable to a fine not exceeding fifty pounds for every day during which the contra- vention continues. 'J'hese conditions do not apply to a Company where there has not been an invitation to the public to subscribe for its shares. li Any contract made by a Company before the date at which it is entitled to commence business is pro- visional only, and is not binding on the Company until this date, when it becomes binding. It is frequently considered desirable to vary the contracts entered into between the vendor and the Company, or between other persons and the Company. One cause for this is, when sufficient capital has not been subscribed, to enable the programme to be carried out, and leave sufficient working capital. Directors should not, of course, find themselves in a difficulty of this nature, as they ought never to allot the shares until they are satisfied the capital sub- scribed is sufficient for all purposes. Should this, however, happen, they must make the best arrange- ment they can with the vendor, and, frequently, sooner than let the scheme fall through, a vendor will consent to a modification of the terms of the agree- ment with him, and thus prevent a catastrophe. Directors, however, contemplating a variation of any contract referred to in the prospectus, must re- member that such contract can only be varied subject to the approval of the statutory meeting of share- holders. Before, however, they come to any arrange- ment of this nature with a vendor or other person, the Directors should consult their solicitors, and, if necessary, be advised by counsel. The solicitors should, in fact, be consulted by the 6o THE director's HANDBOOK. DUTIES AFTER THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 6 1 Directors in almost every step they take during the early days of a Company's existence. Directors are entitled to this protection at the Company's expense, and with many Boards it is an invariable practice to have the solicitor in attendance at all Board meet- ings. As a rule the vendor of a business to a Company makes all the arrangements necessary with the pro- moter, if one is employed, but where the Directors have dealings direct with a promoter they must be exceedingly careful, before making any payment to him, to satisfy themselves such payments are proper and legal. In a case where a person, acting as agent of the Directors and on behalf of the Company, had paid certain preliminary formation expenses, in respect of which the Directors had drawn a cheque in his favour for a lump sum without investigation of the details, the Directors were held liable to repay to the Com- pany the amount of the cheque, less the sums actually disbursed by their agent which ought to have been paid by the Company (Liverpool Household Stores A ssoctalion, L united) . Should the Directors of a new Company wish a special settling-day appointed on the Stock Exchange for transactions in its shares, or for a quotation of the shares in the Official List, they should consult a stockbroker as to the best means of effecting this object. The Committee of the London Stock Exchange will appoint a special settling-day for transactions that may have taken place in the shares of a new Company, provided that no allegation of fraud be substantiated, that there has been no misrepresentation or suppres- sion of material facts, that sufficient scrip or shares are ready for delivery, and that no impediment exists to the settlement of the account. The Secretary of the Share and Loan Department of the Stock Exchange has to give three days' public notice of any application for a special settling- day previously to the application being submitted to the Committee. Bargains in the shares of a new C!ompany are contingent on the appointment of a special settling- day, and the effect of the refusal of a settlement cancels such bargains on the Stock Exchange. A refusal, however, never takes place unless a substantial reason exists. The Committee of the Stock Exchange does not, however, recognise dealings in letters of allot- ment. The Committee will not fix a special settling- day for bargains in shares or securities issued to the Vendors, credited as fully or partly paid, until six months after the date fixed for the special settle- ment in the shares or securities subscribed for by the public. This rule does not, however, necessarily apply to ( • 62 THE director's HANDBOOK. reorganisation or amalgamation of existing Com- panies, or to cases where no public shares are issued, or to cases where the Vendors take the whole of the shares issued for cash. The Committee may order the quotation of any class of the shares or securities of a new Company in the Official List, provided it be of sufficient mag- nitude and importance, and that three days' public notice of the application has been given. The Committee also require that the following documents have been deposited with the Secretary of the Share and Loan Department : (a) The Prospectus. (3) The Certificate of Incorporation, Act of Parlia- ment, or other similar document. {c] The Articles of Association, and, in the case of a Debenture issue, the Trust Deed, if any. [d] The original Applications for Shares or Securities. (e) The Allotment Book for Shares or Securities, with a Summary, signed by the Chairman and Secretary. (/) A copy of the Letter of Allotment. (g) A specimen of the Certificate or Bond. (//) Certified copies of Contracts and Agreements. (/*) Notarially certified translations of Concessions, Deeds, and Agreements. DUTIES AFTER THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 63 [k) A Certificate, verified by the statutory declaration of the Chairman and Secretary, stating : — (i) the number of shares and amount of securities applied for by and unconditionally allotted to the public. (2) The amount of deposits paid thereon. (3) That such deposits are absolutely free from any lien. (4) That the Certificates or Bonds are ready for delivery. (5) That the purchase of the properties has been completed, and the purchase money paid. (6) That no impediment exists to the settlement of the account. (/) The Bankers' Pass Book. (m) A Certificate from the bankers, stating the amount of deposits received. (n) Where fully-paid shares have been granted in lieu of money payments, (i) An Official Certificate that the contract pro- viding for the issue of such shares has been filed with the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies. (2) A Statement as to the date on which such shares were allotted. The Directors must also show that the following requirements have been complied wdth : — That the prospectus has been publicly advertised 64 THE DIRECTOR S HANDBOOK. and agrees substantially with the Articles of Association, and contains the Memorandum of Association ; that it provides for the issue of not less than one-half of the authorised capital and for the payment of ten per cent, upon the amount subscribed, and sets forth the arrangements for raising the capital, whether by shares fully or partly paid up, with the amounts of each respectively, or by an issue of debentures ; and also states the amount paid or to be paid, in money or otherwise, to concessionaires, owners of property, or others on the formation of the Company, or to con- tractors for works to be executed, and the number of shares, if any, proposed to be conditionally allotted. If offering debentures or debenture stocks, how- ever designated or denoted, the prospectus must state all terms, conditions, and circumstances under which such are or may become redeemable or re- payable. That two-thirds of the whole nominal capital proposed to be issued have been applied for and unconditionally allotted to the public 'shares reserved or granted in lieu of money payments to concessionaires, owners of property, or others not being considered to form part of such public allotment), that the Articles of Association restrain the Directors from employing the funds of the Company in the purchase of its own shares, and that a member of the Stock Exchange is DUTIES AFTER THE ALLOTMENT OF SHARES. 65 authorised by the Company to give full information as to the formation of the undertaking, and be able to furnish the Committee with all particulars they may require. A Company issuing, or promising to issue, new shares within twelve months after the first settling-day appointed by the Committee, unless under special cir- cumstances, is liable to exclusion from the Official List. F 66 THE DIRFXTOR'S HANDBOOK. CHAPTER IV. BOARD MEETINGS. 1^11 E ordinary business of a Company is transacted by its Manager, Secretary, and the staff working under them, the Directors only meeting periodically for the purpose of receivdng reports from the officials, discussing and deciding upon important matters brought before them, and for directing and superin- tending the ordinary financial business of the Company. The number of meetings held by a Board varies according to the nature and extent of the Company's business. In some cases it is necessary to hold a Board meeting every week, in some once a fort- night, while the business of some Companies only require the Directors should meet once a month. It is customary when the Directors of a new Company first meet for them to decide upon a day of the week or month as the one most convenient for the majority of the Board to attend, and arrange for it to be the day for the ordinary meetings of the Board. BOARD MEETINGS. 67 Although the day may be thus settled, it is the custom for the Secretary to forward to each Director, a few days previous to each meeting, a notice of the meeting, and this notice should be accompanied by an agenda paper. When any business of unusual importance is to be brought before the meeting, the attention of the Directors should be specially called to it in this paper. Reasonable notice must be given to each Director of Board meetings. In the case of a Company which was inviting applications for preference shares it was resolved, at a meeting of all the Directors, five in number, not to allot till 14,000 shares w^ere applied for; at a meeting of two (a quorum of) Directors, held shortly afterwards, it was resolved that the previous resolution be cancelled, and that the shares then applied for, about 3,000, should be allotted. The meeting was held at two o'clock, on a few hours' notice to two of the Directors, who did not attend, of whom one did not receive his notice till next day, and the other gave notice he could not attend till three; the fifth Director was abroad, and no notice was sent to him. The Court held the allotments made were void. A number of Directors, even although they con- stitute a majority, have no power to act at a meeting of which notice has not been given to the whole body {Portuguese Coppei' Ahnes). F 2 68 THE director's HANDBOOK. Directors of a Company, being the select managing body, can at any meeting of the Board deal with all affairs of the Company then requiring attention, whether ordinary or not, and previous notice of the special business is not a necessary condition of the proceedings being valid {I.a Compagnic dc Mayville V. Whitley). The office of a Director is vacated if he does not within two months from the date of his appoint- ment, or within such shorter time as may be fixed by the regulations of the Company, obtain his qualification, or if, after the expiration of such period, or shorter time, he ceases at any time to hold his qualification. The Articles also, as a rule, prescribe that the office is vacated in certain events, such as the Director becoming bankrupt, or accepting an office of profit under the Company, or being absent from the Board meetings for a certain period. It is the duty of each Director not only to see that he does not vacate his own seat by failing in any of the conditions required of a qualified Director, but also to satisfy himself that each of his co- Directors fulfil the required conditions, and to refuse to allow any unqualified person from sitting and voting as a Director. The Articles of Association frequently contain a clause that the office of a Director is vacated should BOARD MEETINGS. 69 he absent himself for a certain period. It has been held that absence may be sufficient to vacate the office if no other circumstances are shown but that; if it is shown that the absence is involuntary, it cannot be said that the Director had absented him- self. The more reasonable construction is that the article means that the office is vacated if the Director voluntarily or deliberately absents himself for the period mentioned [Li re Lo7idon and Northetn Bank). The Articles of Association usually provide that a Director shall vacate his office if he become bankrupt; this clause, however, does not prevent the appointment of a bankrupt to be a Director [Dawson V. African Co7isolidated Land and Tradijig Co>,. The Articles usually prescribe the quorum, or leave it to the Board to fix their own quorum. In the latter case the fixing of the quorum should be on the agenda paper of the first Board meeting of a new Company. Should a quorum not be present at a Board meeting, it is advisable not to transact any business, as it would not be valid ; but, if the transaction of the business is imperative, it should be brought up at the following Board meeting for special confir- mation, but the Directors at the first meeting, acting illegally, necessarily do so at their own risk, and they should be careful only to act in the absence of a quorum when they are satisfied their acts are 70 THE director's HANDBOOK. ijo evidently for the benefit of the Company that they will be endorsed as a matter of course by their co-Directors at the following Board meeting. Until the number of the quorum has been fixed, a majority of the whole Board must attend to form a quorum [York 7'ramways Co. v. Willows). Every Director has a right to be present at every Board meeting, and, therefore, the Directors as a body have no power to exclude anyone from their meetings. An excluded Director can obtain an injunction restraining his continued exclusion [Pulbrook v. Richmond Consolidated Mining Co.). A Director cannot be compelled to attend to his duties unless the Articles prescribe the amount of time he shall devote to the Company, and a Company cannot prevent one of its own Directors from becoming a Director of a rival Company [London and Mashona- land Co. v. Neiv Alaskonaland Co.). A book, called the '' Directors' Attendance Book," is usually provided, in which the Directors sign their names on entering the Board-room. From this book the attendances are entered into the Minute Book, and it is also useful in arriving at the amount of the fees periodically payable to each Director, when they are divisible according to the attendances of the Directors. Every Company is obliged to keep a Minute Book, in which all resolutions and proceedings are BOARD MEETINGS. 71 to be duly entered, and any minute, if purporting to be signed by the Chairman of the meeting at which resolutions were passed, or by the Chairman of the next succeeding meeting, is received as evidence in all legal proceedings. The same remark applies to shareholders' meetings, for which a separate Minute Book should be kept. The minutes of the Board meetings should commence with the date, to be followed by the names of those Directors and officers present. The business transacted at the meeting should then follow, every discussion of any importance, and the result of every resolution and amendment being recorded, also the names of their proposers and seconders. If there is a duly-appointed Chairman of the Company, he should always preside at Board meetings when present ; if not present, the Vice-Chairman (if any) should preside ; or, failing either, the Board meeting should commence by a Director being voted to the chair, to preside for that particular meeting. The business then commences by the minutes ot the preceding meeting being read; after which the Chairman should put the question, '' Is it your pleasure these minutes be signed as correct r " If the answer be in the affirmative, the Chairman should then sign the minutes ; if any objection be raised, the only point for discussion is whether the minutes are insufficient or incorrect. 72 THE director's HANDBOOK. BOARD MEETINGS. 73 Should a Director allege there is an omission from the particulars entered of what took place at the previous meeting, it can be discussed as to whether he be correct or not, and a decision come to, but no alteration can be made in the minutes so as to vary the effect of or expunge any resolution carried at the previous meeting, for the minutes are merely records of facts, and the only way to annul the effect of resolutions passed at a Board meeting is to pass fresh ones at a subsequent meeting, after due notice has been given to every Director. Mere presence at a Board meeting, at which minutes setting forth resolutions relating to a wrongful act are passed, wall not create liability in one who takes no part in the wrongful act [Lands Allotment Co.). The Secretary should then announce the balance at the bankers', place before the Directors the Bankers' Pass Book, also a statement reconciling this balance with that shown in the Cash Book. If the Company be a trading one, stock sheets should be produced, also statements showing the turn-over or business done since the preceding meeting, and, of course, any further details the Directors may require to be placed before them. Every Director should have his Agenda Paper with him ; on this he should make notes, and it is useful to have these notes with him at the following meeting, so that he may compare them with the J minutes and satisfy himself that the business tran- sacted has been properly recorded by the Secretary. Where the business of a Company requires the frequent attendance of its Directors, it is the practice to divide the Board into Committees. This, however, must be authorised by the Articles, as otherwise the Board may not delegate any of its powers to a committee iHinvarirs Case). Committees arrange their own time for meeting, keep their own Minute Book, and report their tran- sactions to meetings of the full Board. In Banking, Insurance, and other large Companies, one or more Directors are usually in attendance every day, for the purpose of signing cheques and transacting other urgent business. A committee may consist even of a single Director [laurine Co.). All transfers of shares should be placed before the Board. In the absence of any special restrictions in the Articles of Association, shareholders have a right of disposing of and transferring their shares without the consent of the Directors, provided this is done bond fide. For example : Directors have no power to refuse to register transfers, should they know a holder is transferring his shares to nominees, so as to secure, under the Company's regulations, a maximum of voting power at a pending meeting of shareholders [Pender v. Lushingto7i), 74 THE director's HANDBOOK. In a case where a shareholder executed a transfer to a person who gave as his address one where he was only an occasional visitor, aiul the Directors, who had not, by the Articles of Association, any discretion as to accepting a proposed transferee, refused to register the transfer on the ground that the transferee's address was a wrong one, it was decided by the Court the Directors were bound to register the transfer, although it was admitted, on the one hand, that the transferor intended to part with the entire interest in the shares, and, on the other, that he executed the transfer with the intention of escaping liability [Weston's Case). In another case, where the Directors had not power given them by the Articles of Association to refuse transfers, it was held by the Court, on the transferor and transferee deposing that no trust or benefit was reserved for the transferor, that a transfer was valid, although the transferee was not possessed ot any means, and the transfer contained a false de- scription and address of the transferee, and purported to be for valuable consideration, whereas none was paid. On the other hand, where a shareholder had presented a petition to wind up a Company, and the Directors, in order to prevent inquiry, had bought off the shareholder by transferring his shares to a nominee of their own, the Court decided, on the Company being wound up two years afterwards, that the transfer had BOARD MEETINGS. 75 not been a bond fide one, and that the transferor was liable as a contributory {Eyre's Case). The Court also came to the same decision in another case, where some shareholders threatened proceedings, and the Directors agreed they should be allowed to transfer their shares on paying the Company a sum, out of w^hich a claim of one of the Directors against the Company should be satisfied. The rule that Directors who have power to refuse to register a transfer of shares are not bound to disclose their reasons for refusing, if they have considered the question and have acted bond fide, applies to cases where their power is limited to particular grounds for refusal as well as to cases where their power is absolute (/// re Coalport China Co.). The Articles of Association frequently contain a clause prohibiting transfers from being registered, after a call has been made, until the sum has been paid on the shares proposed to be transferred. This clause should be strictly acted upon by Directors, and it also appears that they ought to exercise it after a call has been proposed, although not actually made. At a meeting of Directors the propriety of making a call was discussed, when a shareholder who was present at the meeting induced the Directors to postpone the consideration of the matter. He then, without informing the Directors of his intention, 76 THE director's HANDBOOK. transferred his shares to a pauper. Six days after the meeting the call was made, and the Directors refused to register the transfer. The Court decided the Directors had acted rightly, and refused to rectify the register. It is the duty of the Directors to refuse to register transfers when the Company is on the eve of liquida- tion, or if the facts are such as that the rights of creditors have, in fact, intervened, although the winding up has not commenced. Directors may, however, refuse a transfer made with some reservation of rights to the transferor [Battie's Case). Directors should also refuse to transfer shares not fully paid to an infant, and also to a person of unsound mind. When Directors have, after proper deliberation, or acting to the best of their judgment, approved a transfer, they will not be held responsible for any loss which may arise from accepting an unsubstantial transferee [Faure Electric Accumulator Co.). When the Directors have power of rejecting proposed transfers, they must exercise it reasonably. A notice of any trust, expressed, implied, or constructive, may not be entered in the register. Therefore, when trustees purchase shares in a Com- pany, the Directors should enter their names alone on the register, so as to hold them personally liable BOARD MEETINGS. 77 to the Company for calls, as though the shares were their own private property. The Directors, however, are bound to regard a notice by a cestui que trust not to pay dividends to his trustees, and they should retain the dividends until they are satisfied to whom they are rightly payable. An executor is in some respects different from a trustee, for he is a representative character, and if he merely intimates to the Company his title as executor in order to claim his right as legal personal representative, and makes or gives no request or authority to register his name as a shareholder, he need not become personally liable. The Directors, however, should only allow him a reasonable time to hold the shares in this capacity. A transfer, after it has been carefully scrutinised in the office, as also the certificate of shares accom- panying it, should be confirmed by the Directors at the first meeting after it has been received, and it should be at once registered, otherwise there is an unnecessary delay within the meaning of the 35th Section of the Act of 1862, which entitles a person aggrieved to apply to the Court for an order that the register may be rectified, and if the Court be satisfied that the applicant has suffered damage the Company may be compelled to pay such damage and the costs incurred. 78 THE DIRFXTOR'S HANDBOOK. Directors should, however, for the protection ot the Company, before issuing" the new certificate to the transferee, send a notice to the transferor that a transfer of his shares, purporting to have been executed by him, has been lodged at the Company's office for registration, and that, unless he informs them by return of post this is not in order, the shares will be registered in the name of the trans- feree. This notice, however, does not protect the Company should the Directors act upon a forged transfer [Barton v. L. & N,IV. Raihvay Co.). After transfers have been passed by the lioard, fresh certificates have to be made out and issued and the old ones cancelled. In small Companies, when the office work is almost entin^ly und«^r the control of the Secretary, it is very desirable one of the Directors should ascertain that the numerical numbers of the shares on the new certificates coincide with the numerical number of the shares on the old certificates. He should then cancel the old certificates, either by stamping them *' Cancelled" or else by tearing off or destroying in some other way the signature on the old certificate. In the case of large Companies, where the transfers are very numerous, the Board can only satisfy them- selves that there is a proper office check on the officials who have the charge of the share certificate books. Many Boards, however, now employ the BOARD MEETINGS. 79 Auditors or some other Chartered Accountant to periodically check the issue of new certificates against the old ones returned to the Company. The duty of examining and checking share certi- ficates may, as a rule, be properly left to the Secretary, in which case a Director is not estopped from denying the accuracy of a certificate passed at a Board meeting at which he was present. It is, however, doubtful whether the same rule applies to a Director who signs a share certificate [Dixon v. Kcnnaway & Co.). When the shares are not fully paid up, calls can be made upon the holders when further capital is required, subject to the Articles of Association and to the conditions upon which the shares were origi- nally issued. The Directors are the proper judges as to whether a call is necessary, and the Court will not interfere with their discretion [Bailey v. Birken- head Railway Co.). The call must, however, be made for the benefit ot the shareholders, and not for some purpose of the Directors, otherwise the Court will interfere, the powers of the Directors in respect of calls being fiduciary [Gilbert's Case). Calls upon shares should always be made formally at a Board meeting, and a resolution passed, stating the amount of the call on each share and the date on which it is payable. The notice to the shareholders 8o TIIK director's handbook. should always contain the place where payment is to be made, and a statement that all calls unpaid on the day named shall bear interest at a rate not exceeding th(^ limit prescribed by the Articles from that date until payment. The date on which the call is to be paid must, of course, be a reasonable time after the call has been made ; it is usually prescribed in the Articles of Associ^ition. Table *' A " of "The Companies Act, 1862," requires that twenty-one days' notice shall be given of each call, and this is the usual period named in the Articles. A call made by Directors not duly appointed, at a time when the number of Directors has fallen below the minimum prescribed by the Articles of Association, or by such a number of persons as does not constitute a quorum, is invalid, but a call made at a meeting at which the necessary quorum of Directors was not present, and confirmed when a quorum was present, has been held by the Court to be good [Austin'' s Case). A call made by Directors appointed at a meeting irregularly summoned is also valid [Br Hon Medical Association v. Jones). It is very necessary the regulations of the Company should be strictly complied with in making a call, as, frequently, legal proceedings have to be taken to enforce payment, and a defaulting shareholder BOARD MEETINGS. 81 might, in order to gain time, put the Company to unnecessary expense by being able to raise successfully technical objections to the manner in which the call was made and notices of the call issued. Directors have a perfect legal right to make a call, although the prospectus may have contained a statement that no further calls were contemplated ; and, should the prospectus have stated that it was not intended to make calls beyond a certain amount, the Directors, nevertheless, have power to make such calls. The Articles of Association usually contain a clause giving the Directors power to receive calls in advance, and where there are not special Articles the Directors are so empowered by Table " A." This is a fiduciary power which must be exercised bond fide by the Directors, and not for their own interests. In a case where the Directors paid into the Company's bank the amount remaining uncalled on their shares, and on the same day appropriated it towards their fees, the Court held there had not been a bond fide payment of the calls in adv^ance, and that the Directors remained liable. A call is deemed to have been made at the time when the resolution of the Directors authorising the call was passed. A resolution for a call to be valid must state not only the amount of the call, but also the time at which it is to be paid. Thus, where the Directors 82 THE director's HANDBOOK. of a Company passed a resolution for a call, and the resolution fixed the sum per share to be called up, but left the date at which it was to be paid in blank, and some time afterwards a resolution was passed fixing the date for payment, and notices of the call were sent to the shareholders, the Court held there was no proper call made until the second resolution fixing the date of payment, and the second resolution did not, in point of date, relate back to the first. After calls have been paid, the certificates of shares should be called in and endorsed with a statement of the fact, or else new certificates should be issued in their place. In the latter case, the old certificates should be cancelled in the presence of a Board meeting, or of the Directors who may happen to sign the new certificates. It is desirable that the execution of agreements, contracts, and all documents of this description should take place at a Board meeting. If the nature of the business requires a number of contracts executed, this would be impossible; but any documents binding on the Company, and signed at other times than at a Board meeting, should be formally reported to the following Board. Contracts on behalf of a Company may be made as follows, and may in the same manner be varied or discharged : — 'i.) Any contract which, if made between private BOARD MEETINGS. S3 persons, would be by law required to be in writing, and if made according to English law to be under seal, may be made on behalf of the Company in writing under the common seal of the Company. (2.) Any contract which, if made between private persons, would be by law required to be in writing and signed by the parties to be charged therewith, may be made on behalf of the Company in writing, signed by any person acting under the express or implied authority of the Company. (3.) Any contract which, if made between private persons, would by law be valid, although made by parole only, and not reduced into writing, may be made by parole on behalf of the Company by any person acting under the express or implied authority of the Company. In executing documents, or in accepting or endorsing bills of exchange, Directors should be careful they do so in proper form. For example, w^here four Directors signed their names to a pro- missory note, '' We, the Directors of the ' A ' Com- pany, promise to pay," and at one corner the seal of the Company was afhxed, with " witnessed by L.L.," the Directors were held by the Court personally liable, for there was nothing to exclude their personal G 2 84 THE director's HANDBOOK. liability, and the aflfix.ing the seal was not sufficient to show that the signature was on behalf of the Company. The Company's seal should be kept doubly locked, one key being" retained by the Secretary, and the other should be in th(^ hands of one of the Directors by rotation, or each Director may have a key, if so preferred by the Board. The Articles of a Company made three Directors a quorum. Two Directors only were present at a meeting, when the seal of the Company was affixed by the Secretary to a mortgage deed. The Court of Appeal held that it was not the duty of the mort- gagees to inquire whether the Secretary was duly authorised to affix the seal, and that it must be taken that the deed was duly executed [County of Gloucester Bank v. Riidry Mcrthyr Colliery Co.), Directors should not sign cheques placed before them without ascertaining the accounts have been examined and approved by the proper officer, and, unless there is any necessity, cheques should only be drawn at Board or committee meetings. A list of all cheques drawn between Board meetings should be reported at the following Board Meeting. On the death or resignation of a Director, it is usually in the power of the remaining Directors to elect a successor, but they must, of course, act according to the Articles of Association. BOARD MEETINGS. 85 Before making a selection, a list of the most eligible shareholders holding the necessary quali- fication should be prepared, and their various capa- bilities discussed. It is a commendable practice on many Boards to endeavour to select its members so that each may have some special knowledge of the various depart- ments of the business. For example, it is very desirable for Railways, Waterworks, and Gas Com- panies to have one or two Members of Parliament on the Board, who would represent their interests when Bills or motions came on for discussion affecting them. For the same reason, in an Engineering Company, an engineer of experience would be a useful member of the Board ; in other cases a barrister, chartered accountant, or solicitor would be desirable. Beneficed or licensed clergymen are not allowed to act as Directors or managing partners of a Company, except of a fire or life assurance society or a benefit society. When the Directors consider it necessary to strengthen the Board, they frequently arrange for some one, not previously connected with the Company, to acquire the necessary share qualification, and elect him to the vacant seat ; but this should only be done when there is not a duly qualified and capable share- holder of sufficient social or commercial standing desirous of accepting the vacancy. 86 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. CHAPTER V. MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS. TT is the duty of the Directors of a new Company A to call a general meeting of the shareholders within a j)eriod of not less than one month nor more than three months from the date at which the Company is entitled to commence business; this meeting is called the statutory meeting. At least seven days before the day on which the statutory meeting is held the Directors are required to forward to every shareholder a report, certified by not less than two Directors, or, when there are less than two Directors, by the sole Director and Manager, containing the following statements : — {a) The total number of shares allotted, dis- tinguishing shares allotted as fully or partly paid up otherwise than in cash, and stating in the case of shares partly paid up the extent to which they are so paid up, and, in either case, the consideration for which they have been allotted. [b] The total amount of cash received by the MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS. 87 s Company in respect of such shares, dis- tinguished as aforesaid. {c) An abstract of the receipts and payments of the Company on capital account to the date of the report, and an account or estimate of the preliminary expenses of the Company. [d] The names, addresses, and descriptions of the Directors, Auditors (if any). Manager (if any), and Secretary. (6-) The particulars of any contract, the modifica- tion of which is to be submitted to the meeting for its approval, together with the particulars of the modification or proposed modification. The report must, so far as it relates to the shares allotted by the Company, and to the cash received in respect of such shares, and to the receipts and payments of the Company on capital account, be certified as correct by the Auditors, if any have been appointed. As soon as the report has been issued to the shareholders, the Directors are required to forthwith file a copy, certified as explained above, with the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies. Previous to the statutory meeting the Directors should cause to be prepared a list of the share- holders, with their descriptions and addresses, showing the number of shares held by them respectively, and 88 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. they are required to produce this list at the com- mencement of the meeting-, and the list is to remain open and accessible to any shareholder during the continuance of the meeting. The shareholders present are at liberty to discuss any matter relating to the formation of the Company, or arising out of the report, whether previous notice has been given or not, but no resolution of which notice has not been given in accordance with the Articles may be passed. The meeting may adjourn from time to time, and at any such adjourned meeting any resolution of which notice has been given in accordance with the Articles, either before or subsequently to the former meeting, may be passed, and the adjourned meeting has the same powers as the original meeting. Should the Directors make default, either in filing the report, or in holding the statutory meeting, then, at the expiration of fourteen days after the last day on which the meeting ought to have been held, any shareholder may petition the Court for the winding up of the Company. On the hearing of the petition the Court may either direct that the Company be wound up, or give directions for the report to be filed, or the statutory meeting to be held, or make such other Order as it may consider just, and may order that the costs of the petition be paid by the Directors or any MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS. 89 \ I Other persons who, in the opinion of the Court, are responsible for the default. Every Company is required to hold either annual or half-yearly general meetings, whichever is pre- scribed by the Articles of Association. If no mention of general meetings is made in the Articles, or if there be no Articles, then a general meeting of shareholders has to take place once at least in every year. At these yearly or half-yearly meetings the accounts, showing the results of the operations of the Company, are presented, the election of Directors and Auditors takes place, and the declaration of a dividend sanctioned ; but no business can be transacted at these ordinary meetings other than that arising out of these matters, or matters which are prescribed by the Articles as being "ordinary" business. When any ** special" business — as, for example, altering the Articles of Association — is to be transacted, an extraordinary general meeting has to be summoned, and the business of this meeting is confined to that mentioned in the circular convening the meeting. The notice calling an extraordinary general meeting, at which resolutions will be put requiring to be confirmed at a second meeting, frequently contains a clause that, " Should such resolutions be duly passed, the same will be submitted for confirmation as special resolutions to a subsequent extraordinary general meeting, which will be held on at the same 90 THE director's HANDBOOK. time and place." The Court of Appeal have decided that should the resolutions be passed at the first meeting it is necessary to send out a notice to the shareholders informing them of the fact, and that the second meeting will be held, otherwise they might be in doubt as to whether the second meeting was going to take place. Previous to a general meeting of shareholders, the Directors should, at a Board meeting, discuss and settle the notice convening it, and, subsequently, the programme of the meeting. The notice convening the ordinary annual general meeting should contain the place and time of meeting, with the statement that it is held for the purpose of receiving the accounts and report of the Directors for the financial year last ended, for the election of Directors and Auditors, and for ordinary business. It is also customary to state the period during which the transfer books will be closed ; this is usually the fourteen days immediately preceding the meeting, the time prescribed by Table **A." The notice convening an extraordinary general meeting should give full information as to that which is proposed shall be done, otherwise the resolutions passed may be invalid, and, if so, a confirmation at the annual general meeting will not render them valid. The notice must also disclose all facts necessary to MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS. 91 J enable each shareholder receiving it to determine in his own interest whether or not he ought to attend the meeting; and pecuniary interest of a Director in the matter of a special resolution to be proposed at the meeting is a material fact for this purpose {Ttessen v. Henderson). The Articles of Association usually mention the month in which the annual general meeting is to be held ; but should they not contain a clause to this effect the Directors are at liberty to hold the meeting on any day not later than the 31st December in the year following that in which the statutory meeting or the previous general meeting was held. It is not, however, desirable to unduly postpone the holding of the annual meeting, as it provokes hostile criticism, which is always more or less hurtful to a Company, and it should, therefore, be held two or three months after the financial year has closed. This will allow sufficient time for the books of account to be balanced, and for the Revenue Account, Balance Sheet, and any other statements the Directors desire to submit to the shareholders to be prepared and audited. When the business is transacted in the Colonies or abroad, and the returns cannot be transmitted to the head office for several weeks after the date to which the accounts are made up, a longer time has necessarily to elapse before the annual meeting can 92 THE director's HANDBOOK. be held. Many Companies carrying on business both in Great Britain and the Colonies present accounts givani^- the results of the Colonial business to a date three months earlier than that of the date on which the head office books are closed. Articles of Association frequently contain a clause that the accounts are to be submitted to the Auditors fourteen days before the meeting, and that after they are checked with the books and vouchers they are to be returned by the Auditors, with their report thereon. This is, however, seldom if ever carried into practice ; the usual plan is for the Auditors to be consulted as to the manner in which the accounts shall be submitted to the shareholders, and for them to commence their checking without waiting for the closing of the books, while in small Companies, when the book-keeper is not sufficiently experienced to close the books, the Auditors (supposing them to be Chartered Accountants) are frequently instructed by the Directors to do so, and to prepare therefrom the statements to be submitted to the shareholders. The Accounts, when prepared, should be placed before a Board meeting for consideration, special notice being given by the Secretary when sending out the usual summons that part of the business is to settle and pass the Accounts previous to audit. It is very important all the Directors should be present, as the Accounts are those of the Directors, even MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS. 93 when, at their request, they are prepared by the Auditors. Great care should be exercised by the Directors to prevent a Revenue Account being issued to the shareholders showing a profit which has not been legitimately earned. For this purpose, schedules of the debtors, bills receivable, stock-in-trade, invest- ments, and other assets should be carefully scrutinised, so that the Directors can ascertain whether a suffi- cient amount has been charged against the Revenue Account for loss likely to arise on realisation of the debts and for depreciation of stocks. When the Company holds leasehold property an amount should be charged annually against the Revenue Account, so that the balance of the ledger account of this asset will represent an amount not exceeding its value; for the same reason the Revenue Account should also be charged with depreciation for plant, machinery, and property of every description of a perishable nature. If, during the period embraced by the Accounts, the Company has incurred an extraordinary expendi- ture, which the Directors consider will add to the profits of the Company in succeeding years, and that it would therefore be unfair to charge it against the Revenue Account under consideration, they should, before deciding to include part of this expenditure on the credit side of the balance sheet, and, therefore, ^4 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. not include it among the expenditure in the Revenue Account, consult their solicitor as to whether they can do so without incurring the risk of personal liability, should the Company go into liquidation. If a Director, or any other officer of a Company not having Articles of Association, be indebted to the Company at the date on which the books are closed, the sum due by them must be separately stated on the credit side of the Balance vSheet, as required by the form of Balance Sheet affixed to Table " A." Directors are required, not only during the audit, but at all times, to give to the Auditors access to the books, accounts, and vouchers, and such informa- tion and explanation as may be necessary for the performance of the duties of the Auditors. The Articles of a Company provided for the submission of accounts up to a date within three months, and reports thereon, the sanction of a dividend, and the transaction of the ordinary business at the annual general meeting. It was held that a final dividend could not be sanctioned except at an annual general meeting at which accounts up to the prescribed date and reports thereon were submitted [Nicholson v. Rhodesia Trading Co.). Before meeting the shareholders, either at an ordinary or an extraordinary general meeting, the Directors should decide on the resolutions, also their proposers and seconders ; otherwise time is wasted, MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS. 95 and the absence of these arrangements frequently causes confusion, resulting in great disorder. Should opposition be expected from the shareholders, it is advisable for the I^irectors to issue proxies, with the names of two or three of their number inserted as proxy holders. When this is done care must be taken that the proxies are legal, and that they are received at the offices of the Company within the time prescribed, the Secretary being instructed to endorse on each proxy the hour and day on which it arrives. Proxies hav^e to bear a peimy stamp, either adhesive or impressed, and the payments for stamping the proxies must be borne by the Directors personally, and must not come out of the Company's funds [Studdert v. Grosvtnor). If the Articles of Association require that meetings of the shareholders should be advertised in newspapers, the Directors should be careful to comply with this regulation. Before commencing the business of the meeting, the Directors should ascertain that the prescribed quorum is present. Should no quorum be prescribed, which is very unusual, then the business can be transacted by a vote of the majority of those present. " Whenever a certain number are incorporated, a major part may do any corporate act ; so, if all are summoned and part appear, a major part of those 96 THE DIRFXTOR S HANDBOOK. that appear may do a corporate act " {^Attorney-General V. Davy). When the Articles prescribe a quorum, business cannot be transacted by a less number. The assent of every member of a Company g-iven separately has not the same effect as a resolution passed at a General Afeeting [Re George Neivmafi & Co.). It is usual for the Chairman of the Board of Directors to preside at all meetings, and the Articles of Association usually contain a clause stating that the Chairman, if present, shall preside. If he be not present, then the chair is usually taken by one of the Directors. As a rule, there is no difficulty about the election of a Chairman, but, occasionally, at meetings where it is known that matters will be brought forward involving acrimonious discussion, shareholders often attach undue importance as to who shall preside. At all meetings where it is not prescribed by the Articles as to who shall preside, the proceedings commence by a proposition, made by one of the members, " That Mr. A. do take the chair." This motion must be seconded, and, if it is not agreed to, and it appears there will be confusion over the election of a Chairman, the most desirable plan is for one of the Directors to propose "That Mr. B. do act as president during the election of a Chairman." The Director or shareholder thus appointed acts MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS. 97 as Chairman until a final selection is made as to who shall preside during the meeting, and his duty is simply to confine the discussion to the election, and only to hear motions naming a Chairman. If several names are proposed, the temporary Chairman should obtain the opinion of the meeting upon each candidate successively in the order in which their names are proposed, as follows : *' The question is that Mr. C. do take the chair," and then put it to the vote, repeating the same for Mr. D. or Mr. E. The majority of the votes decides the final selection. The temporary Chairman then vacates the chair, unless he has been selected as Chairman for the meeting. The principal duty of the Chairman is to maintain order, conduct proceedings regularly, and take care that the sense of the meeting is properly ascertained with regard to any question before it [National Divellings Society v. Sykes. To this purpose the Chairman should confine dis- cussion to the resolution or amendment before the meeting. Mere conversation is, of course, a breach of order, and should at once be suppressed. If more than one member attempt to speak at the same time, the Chairman should call on the one who, in his opinion, was the first to rise from his seat; the meeting, however, have it in their power to decide by a resolution who shall be heard. A Chairman should be strictly impartial, and is H 98 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. bound to put to the meeting any resolution or amendment which has been proposed and seconded, even though it be entirely at variance with his own wishes. It is very desirable a Chairman should not bring forward any motions himself which are not likely to be carried without discussion. Where notice is required and has not been given, or if insufficient notice has been given, the Chairman should decline to put the notice to the meeting. An amendment, however, of which notice has not been given may be proposed to a motion properly moved so long as it is within the scope of the notice originally given {Henderson v. Bank of Australasia). A Chairman has no power to dissolve a meeting before it has finished the business for which it is convened, and if he does so the meeting is com- petent to resolve to appoint another Chairman and go on with the business [National Dwellings Society V. Sykes) . On assuming the chair, the Chairman's first duty is to call upon the Secretary to read the notice calling the meeting, and the business is then proceeded with. At the annual general meetings of the share- holders, the first business usually transacted, after the Secretary has read the notice convening the meeting, is the reading of the report of the Directors and the accounts showing the result of the transactions, but, MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS. 99 as these are invariably printed and circulated amongst the shareholders previous to the meeting, it is open to the meeting to resolve they be taken as read. The resolution, " That the accounts and report be adopted," follows, and this is usually proposed by the Chairman in his capacity as Chairman of the Board or leading Director present, and he takes this opportunity of giving a summary of the transactions of the Company during the period embraced by the accounts, together with his views thereon and estimates for the future. This resolution is usually seconded by another Director, who is, of course, entitled to make a speech ; but if he be satisfied with the Chairman's remarks, and feels there is no object in supplementing them, he need merely second the resolution. Any other Director or member may then speak in support of the resolution, or may move an amendment. The amendment must not be a direct negative to the resolution, such as " That the accounts and report be not adopted," for there is no necessity for this, the vote taken on the resolution having the same effect as that on an amendment of this nature. Amendments can be made by leaving out words, by adding words, or by substituting words for others in the resolution ; all amendments must be seconded. Amendments can also be made to amendments. Amendments have priority over the original H 2 100 THE director's HANDBOOK. motion, and are put to the meeting in the order in which they are brought forward. When disposed of, the resolution, as altered by the amendments carried, is then put from the chair. No member may speak twice on a resolution or amendment, except to explain any portion of his speech which may have been misunderstood, but in his explanation he is not allowed to introduce new matter, and should he do so the Chairman should at once interfere. A reply is allowed to the mover of a substantive motion, but not to the mover of an amendment. Should the Chairman improperly refuse to submit an amendment to the meeting, the resolution actually carried will be invalidated {Henderson v. Bank of Anstralasiii). Should the shareholders not approve of the report and accounts, and the resolution for their adoption be rejected, or an amendment passed to a similar effect, a committee of investigation is usually at once appointed by the shareholders. The appointment of a committee of investigation frequently does great injury to the credit of a Company, and this should be explained to the meeting by the Chairman or one of the Directors before the resolution is put. Directors should therefore resist the appoint- ment of a committee of investigation, if the proposal proceeds from mere personal feeling or is based on MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS. lOI improper grounds; but they should at once acquiesce if they feel the shareholders as a body believe they have a genuine grievance, and facilitate the inquiry in every way. While the committee are engaged in their investigation, the Directors, or so many of them as remain in office, will of course continue to carry on the business in the ordinary way ; and when the committee have issued their report it is the practice for the Directors to consider it, and to reply to it by issuing a circular to the shareholders, and summoning a general meeting, at which it will be determined what steps are to be taken, having regard to the facts contained in the committee's report, and the reply of the Directors. Should, however, the report and accounts presented by the Directors at the annual general meeting be adopted, the shareholders are then asked to sanction the declaration of a dividend, unless the profits do not admit of one being declared, and their next duty is usually the election of Directors in the place of those who retire, it being the customary practice for some of the Directors to retire annually by rotation, but, as a rule, they are eligible for re-election. If there are more eligible candidates than there are vacancies, the names are usually submitted to the meeting singly, the Chairman deciding by counting the hands held up for each candidate, and those for whom the greater I02 THE director's HANDBOOK. number of hands are held up are elected. Unless a poll is demanded, th(; decision of the Chairman as to the result of a show of hands is final. The Auditors are then elected, and their rt^munera- tion fixed. It is now the customary practice for the shareholders to re-elect those who have just vacated the office. Unless there is any reason for supposing they have not done their duty properly, the re-election of the Auditors is to be commended, on account of their familiarity with the books of account. Should the Auditors, however, not be Chartered iVccountants, but have been originally elected merely on account of their having been shareholders, the Directors should, in their own interests, as well as in the interests of the shareholders, take the earliest opportunity of replacing the amateur by a i)rofessional Auditor. Occasionally, the Articles of Association require the Auditor to be a shareholder; the clause to this effect should be altered at the first opportunity. The Articles of Association usually contain clauses giving shareholders the power of calling an extra- ordinary general meeting, and stating the circumstances when they may and when they may not do so. "The Companies Act, 1900," enacts that, notwith- standing anything there may be in any regulations of a Company, the Directors must, on the requisition of the holders of not less than one-tenth of the MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS. 103 ^ issued capital, upon which all calls or other sums then due have been paid, forthwith proceed to con- vene an extraordinary general meeting. The requisition, however, must state the objects of the meeting, and must be signed by the requisi- tionists, and deposited at the office of the Company, and may consist of several documents in like form, each signed by one or more requisitionists. Should the Directors not proceed to convene a meeting, to be held within twenty-one days from the date of the requisition being deposited, the requisi- tionists, or a majority of them in value, may themselves convene the meeting. Any meeting, however, so con- vened must not be held after three months from the date of the deposit. If at the meeting, when held, a resolution requiring confirmation at another meeting is passed, the Directors are required to forthwith convene a further extra- ordinary general meeting for the purpose of considering the resolution, and, if thought fit, of confirming it as a special resolution. Should the Directors not convene the meeting within seven days from the date of the passing of the first resolution, the requisitionists, or a majority of them in value, may themselves convene the meeting. The requisitionists are required to convene these meetings in the same manner, as nearly as possible, as meetings convened by the Directors. I04 THE director's HANDBOOK. A resolution, passed by a Company registered under the Act of 1862, is considered a special resolution whenever it has been passed by a majority of not less than three-fourths of such members of the Company for the time being entitled, according to the regulations of the Company, to vote as may be present in person or by proxy (where proxies are allowed), at any general meeting of which notice specifying the intention to propose such resolution has been duly given, and such resolution has been confirmed by the majority of such members at a subsequent general meeting, of which notice has been duly given, and held at an interval of not less than fourteen days, nor more than a month from the date of the meeting at which the resolution was first passed. The notice of meeting required by the Articles must be given, and the number of days' notice required means that these days must be clear days. A fresh notice must be given of a confirmatory meeting, and must contain the actual words of the resolution to be submitted for confirmation. The resolution must be confirmed without amendment and in the same form as adopted at the first meeting [Wall V. London and Northern Assets Corporation). Where a Director of a Company took shares in new capital raised under a resolution passed and con- firmed at meetings, the interval between which was thirteen days only (the meetings having been held MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS. 'O5 \ i on the 3rd and 17th January), and the Company afterwards went into liquidation, he was held to be precluded from objecting to the validity of the resolu- tion as a ground for his removal from the list of contributories. In this case an extraordinary general meeting of the shareholders was held on the 3rd of January, at which a special resolution w^as passed that the capital of the Compemy should be increased from ;^ 1 0,000 to ;^30,ooo by the issue of 200 new shares of i^ioo each, and this resolution was purported to be confirmed at a subsequent general meeting on the 17th January. The Director at the first meeting offered to take ten of the new shares, and on the i6th January he forwarded to the Secretary the sum of ;£io5 on account of such shares, and the shares were entered in his name on the register of members. After the Company had gone into liquidation, six years afterwards, the Director stated he was not aware he was on the register in respect of those ten shares. The Secretary admitted that he had not sent out letters of allotment to those shareholders who ex- pressed their intention of taking new shares at the meeting on the 3rd January, but it appeared the Director had been present at successive meetings of the Board at which statements of assets and liabili- ties were adopted containing entries of new shares io6 THE director's HANDBOOK. issued, including the ten shares standing in his name, and he was held by the Court to be liable. The Articles of Association usually contain a clause providing how many votes each shareholder is entitled to. In the first instance voting is taken by a show of hands, each shareholder having a single vote for himself, but none for any persons whose proxies he may hold [Ernest v. Loma Gold Mines), When some of the shareholders are dissatisfied with the result of a show of hands, they can, if they obtain the support of the number required by the Articles, demand a poll, in which case proxies may be used. The demand for a poll, and the method of taking it, must be in accordance with the provisions of the Articles. A notice convening an extraordinary general meeting to confirm a special resolution was accom- panied by a circular from the Secretary and Directors, with a proxy attached, asking for the return of the proxy in support of the resolution. By a printer's error the date of the meeting was left blank in the proxy. Several of the members executed and returned their proxies (which were duly stamped) without filling up the blanks, which were filled up by the secretary, before the proxies were lodged with the Company. The Court of Appeal held that these proxies were valid within the provisions of MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS. !07 "The Stamp Act, 1891," Sec. 80 [Ernest v. Loma Gold Mines ^ Ltd.). Proxy papers to be used at meetings to consider schemes of arrangement under " The Joint Stock Com- panies (Arrangement) Act, 1870," must follow the office form settled by the Court in 1896. Should a poll be demanded by a shareholder on any resolution or amendment, and he is supported by the number of shareholders prescribed by the Articles as being the minimum number who may demand a poll, the declaration by the Chairman that the resolu- tion has been carried is void, and the decision is then arrived at by means of the poll. When the Articles of Association give shareholders qualified to vote, and holding a certain number of shares, the right of demanding a poll, the power is exercisable only by shareholders present in person ; as the holder of a proxy is not the holder of the shares included in the proxy, and, therefore, a proxy authorising a person to vote does not authorise him to demand a poll. The Chairman has a right to decide whether the poll shall be taken at once, or whether the meeting shall be adjourned in order to give members who are not present an opportunity to vote ; but, whatever the strict rights of a Chairman might be, it would scarcely be seemly for him to insist on a poll being taken at once, when it was evidently the wish of the io8 THE director's HANDBOOK. majority of the shareholders that there should be an adjournment. Ify however, the Directors, and a large body of shareholders acting against the Directors, have both issued circulars asking for proxies, then it would be perfectly legitimate for the Chairman to decide that the poll should be taken at once, without any adjournment. It has been decided by the Court, where the Articles of Association provided that if at any general meeting of the Company a poll should be demanded it should be taken in such manner as the Chairman shall direct, that the Chairman h£id a legal right to direct the poll to be taken then and there, notwithstanding a protest by one of the shareholders. Before the poll is taken scrutineers should be appointed, and the most suitable persons for this purpose are the Auditors, as, being already officers of the Company and acquainted with its affairs, they are preferable to strangers, and they are the only persons officially connected with the Company who could be perfectly impartial. Should a Director be debarred by the Articles of Association from voting as a Director in respect of any contract in which he is interested, this does not disentitle him to vote as a shareholder at a general meeting. When a meeting of shareholders is adjourned, it MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS. 109 is not necessary to give any notice of the adjourn- ment, as it is merely a continuation of the previous meeting, at which, should the notice of the original meeting have been properly given, all the share- holders had the opportunity of being present, while those who were present agreed to the time and place of adjournment. Should the Directors, however, feel that those shareholders who were present at the first meeting are likely to act at the adjourned meeting against the interests of the general body of shareholders, they may, of course, send out a notice of the ad- journed meeting to all the shareholders, with any other document, explaining what has taken place, and their own views thereon. Within fifteen days after its confirmation a printed copy of every special resolution, with par- ticulars of the times and place, or places of passing and confirming the same, and authenticated by the signature of the Chairman, a Director, or the Secre- tary of the Company, must be filed with the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies. A copy of every special resolution must be an- nexed to, or embodied in, every copy of the Articles issued after the confirmation of the resolution, and every Director is liable to a penalty of one pound for each copy of which default has been made. Every Company registered under the Act of 1862, / / no THE DIRFXTOR'S HANDBOOK. having a capital divided into shares, has to make out a list of its members on the fourteenth day succeeding the day on which the annual general meeting has been held. This list contains the names, addresses, and occupations of all the members, and the number of shares held by each of them, and is to be entered in a separate part of the Register of Members, which will also contain a summary showing the following particulars : — 1. The amount of the capital of the Company and the number of shares into which it is divided. 2. The number of shares taken from the commencement of the Company up to the date of the summary, distinguishing between the shares issued for cash and the shares issued otherwise than for cash, or only partly for cash. 3. The amount of calls made on each share. 4. The total amount of calls received. 5. The total amount of calls unpaid. 6. The total amount of calls forfeited. 7. The total amount of debt due from the Company in respect of all mortgages and charges which require registration under *' The Companies Act, 1900," or which would require registration if created after the commencement of that Act. MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS. 1 1 1 ' 8. The names, addresses, and occupations of the persons who have ceased to be members since the last list was made, and the number of shares held by each of them. 9. The names and addresses of the persons who are the Directors of the Company at the date of the summary. A copy of this list and summary, signed by the Manager or the Secretary, and bearing a five-shilling Inland Revenue stamp, has to be filed within seven days from this fourteenth day in the ofiice of the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies at Somerset House, and a Director, knowingly permitting this not being done, is liable to a penalty of five pounds for every day during which the default continues. It is also the duty of the Directors to keep proper minutes of all resolutions and proceedings of general meetings of the shareholders, and these minutes, if purporting to be signed by the Chairman of the meeting at which these resolutions were passed or proceedings had, or by the Chairman of the next succeeding meeting, are received as evidence in all legal proceedings. The minutes of meetings of the shareholders are usually kept in a distinct book from the minutes of the Board meetings, although there are not any regulations to this effect. When kept distinct, however, m I 12 THE DIRFXTOR S HANDBOOK. there cannot be any objection to their being shown to any shareholder who may desire inspection. The Directors' Minute Book is, however, a record of the private affairs of the Company, and no one has any power to compel its production. GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OF DIRECTORS. 1 13 CHAPTER VI. GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OF DIRECTORS. nr^HE Directors of a Public Company are practically A its agents or managing partners, and their general authority extends to all acts reasonably necessary for management. They must be careful at all times to act strictly within their powers, as defined by the Acts of Parliament and the Articles of Association, and for their own protection they should ask their solicitor to be present at all Board meetings at which they expect any difficult matters are likely to be brought forward. The Directors, as already explained, have a general power of allotment of shares and of approving transfers of shares, of employing the Company's funds, of making calls, receiving payment of calls in advance, and forfeiting shares; but they can be held liable, as trustees, for the misuse of these powers. At the same time, however, they are in one respect in a very different position to that of trustees ; for although they may be rendered liable for misuse of their powers, and may also be held personally liable for moneys belonging to a Company they 114 THK director's HANDBOOK. have improperly applied to their own use, or also for moneys misapplied, from which they have not deri\ed any }M'rsonal benefit, yet they cannot be charged, as a trustee can be, for want of due dilig-ence in neglecting to sue, when by suing earlier an amount migln have been recovered. In giving his decision to this effect, the late Master of the Rolls, Sir G. Jessel, made the following remarks : — ''One must be very careful in administering the law of Joint-Stock Companies not to press so hardly on honest Directors as to make them liable for these constructive defaults, the only eflFect of which would be to deter all men of any property, and perhaps all men who have any character to lose, from becoming Directors of Companies at all. On the one hand, I think the Court should do its utmost to bring fraudulent Directors to account, and, on the other hand, should also do its best to allow honest men to act reasonably as Directors. *' Wilful default, no doubt, includes the case of a trustee neglecting to sue, though he might by suing earlier have recovered a trust fund; in that case he is made liable for want of due diligence in his trust. But, I think. Directors are not liable on the same principle. Directors have sometimes been called trustees, or commercial trustees, and sometimes they have been called managing partners ; it does not much matter what you call them, so long as you GENERAL DUTIES AND POWF.RS OF DIRECTORS. I 15 understand what their true position is, which is that they are really commercial men managing a trading concern for the benefit of themselves and of all the other shareholders in it. They are bound, no doubt, to use reasonable diligence, having regard to their position, though probably an ordinary Director, who only attends at the Board occasionally, cannot be expected to devote as much time and attention to the business as the sole managing partner of an ordinary partnership ; but they are bound to use fair and reasonable diligence in the management of the Company's affairs, and to act honestly. " But when, without fraud and without dishonesty, they have omitted to get in a debt due to the Company, by not suing within time, or because the man was solvent at one moment and became insolvent at another, T am of opinion that it by no means follows as a matter of course, as it might in the case of ordinary trustees of trust funds or of a trust debt, that they are to be made liable. Traders have a discretion as to whether they shall sue their customers, a discretion which is not vested in the trustees of a debt under a settlement." The late Master of the Rolls then expressed his opinion that the Directors, as ordinary managing partners of a trading concern, were allowed a discretion, and then added : — "Again, Directors are called trustees; they are no I 2 ii6 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. doubt trustees of assets which have come into their hands, or whicli are under their control, but they are not trustees of a debt due to the Company " [Forest of Dean Coal Co.). The late Lord Justice James made the following nmiarks when delivering a judgment : — ** The distinction between a Director and a Trustee is an essential distinction, founded on the very nature of things. A trustee is a man who is the owner of the property, and deals with it as principal, as owner, and as master, subject only to an equitable oi)ligation to account to some persons to whom he stands in the relation of trustee, and who are his ccstuis que trust. The same individual may fill the office of Director and also be a trustee having property, but that is a rare, exceptional, and casual circumstance. The office of Director is that of a paid servant of the Company. A Director never enters into a contract for himself, but he enters into contracts for his principal, that is, for the Company of whom he is a Director and for whom he is acting. He cannot sue on such contracts, nor be sued on them, unless he exceeds his authority. That seems to me to be the broad distinction between trustees and Directors" {Smith V. Anderson). Directors are bound to use the same amount ot prudence in acting for their Company as they would in the same circumstances when acting for themselves, GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OF DIRECTORS. I I 7 and they will not be held personally liable should the Company sustain a loss through acts done imprudently, but within the scope of their powers. So long as ])irectors intend to do what is right, and only commit mere errors of judgment, the Court will not hold them personally responsible. Although knowledge of and sanction of misconduct are enough to create liability, even in the absence of actual participation in the misconduct, yet each Director is only liable for money improperly received by himself, or by himself jointly with others [Parker v. McKenna). A Director is not liable for the misapplication by others of a cheque which he joined in drawing for a lawful purpose [Montr otter Asphalfe Co.). The Court will, however, hold Directors personally liable if, through not complying with the regulations of the Company, the shareholders suffer loss. In a case where an Insurance Company represented in its business prospectuses that half of the premiums received would be invested in Consols for the benefit of the policy-holders, and the Directors omitted to do so, a Director was, on the Company going into liquidation, held liable for half the premiums received during the period he acted as a Director, although he resided in the country and had seldom attended the Board meetings. It was clearly his duty to see that the investments were made in accordance with the contract with the policy-holders, and his not n8 THE DIRECTORS HANDBOOK. r doing so was a breach of trust to the Company, for which he could be made liable. For his own protection, every Director should periodically inspect the securities of the Company. Many Boards, especially those of Banks, instruct the Auditors to present themselves, without notice, and to demand the instant production of all the securities, either once or twice during the year, in addition to the inspection at the audit, and the practice is much to be commended. Unless there are trustees specially appointed, in whose name the investments are made, they should stand in the names of two at least of the Directors, and never under any circumstances in the names of the Manager, Secretary, or other official, without being jointly held in the name also of one of the Directors. Being agents, the Directors are not allowed to make any profit without the knowledge and consent of their principals, that is, the shareholders; for example, where shares were issued at a premium, and the Directors made a profit by taking new shares off the hands of persons to whom a large number were allotted, and then selling them, they were held liable to refund this proht {Parker v. McKenna). Where, however, the Articles provide that Directors may participate in the profits of contracts made with the Company upon declaring their interest in such profits, they m^iy do so provided a Director must GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OE DIRECTORS. I 1 9 disclose in each case, not only that he has an interest, but also the nature and amount of his interest ( Turnhnll v. West Ridmg Club). A Director cannot justify himself for sanctioning an improper payment of the funds of a Company by asserting ignorance of the purpose to which the funds were to be applied ; and if a Director merely protests ^igainst a proposed transaction being carried out which he knows to be improper, but does nothing more, he stands in no better position than his co-Directors who carry out this transaction. The Statute of Limitations is a bar to proceedings against a Director for misfeasance, consequently, unless the claim is founded upon any fraud or fraudulent breach of trust, or is to recover trust property, or the proceeds of the breach still retained by the Director, or previously received by him and converted to his own use, an action cannot be main- tained against him after the lapse of six years [Lands Allotment Co.; see also " The Trustee Act, 1888," Sec. 8;. In a case where Directors had improperly allotted a large number of shares to themselves at an under- value, it was held by the Court of Appeal that they must account to the Company for the profits which they had derived from the sale of such of the shares thus allotted as they had disposed of, and that, as to the shares which they retained, the proper measure of the damages was, under the circumstances, not I20 THE DIRKCTOR'S HANDBOOK. the highest price at which any shares of the Company had been sold during the period for which the Directors had held their shares, but the market value of the shares at the dates at which they were respectively allotted to the Directors, and that they must pay to the Company the excess (if any) of that market value above the sums which they had paid to the Company for the shares respectively [S/iazu V. Holland). Directors who so use their powers as to obtain benefits for themselves at the expense of the other shareholders, without informing them of the facts, cannot be allowed to retain those benefits, but must account for them to the Company, so that all the shareholders may participate in them [Alexander v, Aulovmttc Telephone Co.). Directors are not liable for all their mistakes, but only for negligence which is in a business sense culpable or gross. Nor is a Director liable for untrue representations made to the shareholders if he honestly believed the representations to be true, and had at the time reasonable grounds for his belief {In re National Bank of Wales, Ltd.). A Director who is acting honestly himself is entitled to trust the officers of the Company not to conceal from him what they ought to report to him, if he has reasonable ground for suspecting that they are deceiving him [In re National Bank of Wales, Ltd.). GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OF DIRECTORS. 12 1 A Director resigned his office, and his resignation was accepted by the Board. After this his name appeared as one of the Directors in a report pre- sented by the Board to the shareholders. He took no part in the preparation of the report or in recommending the dividend proposed by it. The Court held that, even if he knew that his name appeared in the report as a Director, he was not liable for the statements contained in it or the recommendation of the dividend [In re National Bank of Wales, Ltd.). Directors cannot pay themselves for their services, or make presents to themselves, out of the Com- pany's assets, unless authorised to do so by the instrument regulating the Company, or by the share- holders at a properly convened meeting. The assets of an incorporated Company, though a private Com- pany, are not the property of the shareholders for the time being, and if the Directors misapply those assets by applying them to purposes for which they cannot be lawfully applied by the Company itself, the Company, on being properly set in motion, can make them liable [In re George Newman & Co.). A clause of the Articles of Association of a Banking Company provided that the Company should have a paramount lien on all the shares held by any shareholder for all his debts to the Company, and empowered the Directors in case of non-payment / 122 THE director's HANDBOOK. of any such debt, or in the event of the bankruptcy of the shareholder, to sell his shares, and apply the proceeds in discharge of his debt. Another clause empowered the Directors to lend the funds of the Company, or give credit, with or without security, and provided that no advances without security should be made, or credit given, to any Director. It was held that the lien given by the first of the above clauses was security within the second clause, and that a loan might be made to a Director without any other security than the lien, if the Board considered his shares to be of sufficient value [In re National Bank of Wales, Ltd.). Should it be considered desirable by the Directors that the Company should borrow money for the purpose of its business, they are, as a rule, allowed to mortgage the Company's property without there being an expressed power given them to do so in the Memorandum and Articles of Association ; at the same time, where nothing is contained in the Memorandum, a power to borrow is not implied " unless it be properly incident to the course and conduct of the business for its proper purpose {Blackburn Society v. Brooks), Should, however, the Articles contain a prohibition to borrow or mortgage, the Directors should be careful not to borrow, whatever security they may be able to offer, or however advantageous it may be considered for the Company. GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OF DIRECTORS. I 23 When it is desirable or necessary for a Company to borrow, the Directors should discuss the various means of raising the required amount before coming to a decision. U the money be wanted for a short period, it would be unwise to accept it on loan on terms which would not allow of its being returned until the expiration ot a period longer than that for which it is required. On the other hand, if the Directors wish to borrow for a considerable time, it is preferable to do so in the first instance than to accept a temporary loan on the chance of being able to renew it if necessary. When money is required for temporary purposes, the best medium is usually the Company's Bankers ; when wanted for a term, or indefinitely, the Directors usually issue debentures or mortgage some of the Company's property. Where the Memorandum or Articles give a limited power to borrow or mortgage, there is an implied veto on exceeding the limit [Wenlock v. River Dee Co.). Directors may become personally liable in damages if they represent that they have authority to issue debentures when such authority does not exist [Firbank V. HuTnphreys). Should Directors inadvertently borrow beyond their powers, but the Company could, by altering its Articles of Association or otherwise, have authorised the loan, the best plan is for the Directors to call a meeting \ / 124 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. of the shareholders, and obtain a ratification by the Company of what they have done, and the loan then becomes valid [Irvine v. Union Bank of Australia), When the Memorandum or Articles confer a borrowing power and do not restrain the Directors m exercising this power, they may, acting under their general powers of conducting the business, borrow and mortgage without any further authority from the Company. A debenture, as defined by Mr. Seward Brice, Q.C., is an instrument under seal, creating a charge, accord- ing to its wording, upon the assets specified therein of the Company, and to that extent conferring upon the grantees a priority over other subsequent creditors or existing creditors not possessed of such a charge. This definition is, however, not strictly correct, as there are three varieties of debentures issued by Companies : — 1. Instruments which do not create any charge, and which are, therefore, only bonds. 2. Debentures in accordance with the above definition. 3. Mortgage Debentures. An issue of debentures should be made by Directors in a formal manner at a Board meeting. The seal of the Company should be afiixed to each, and they should be delivered to the subscribers when the Company has received from them the full amount. Debentures when GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OF DIRECTORS. I 25 sealed but not delivered are not "issued" [Mowail v. Castle Steel and Iron Works). In executing and issuing debentures Directors must have regard to the Articles of Association, or their validity will be affected if any irregularity is apparent on the face of them. Debentures may be issued at a discount without any special authority being conferred by the Articles, and, when so issued, may be taken by a Director on the same terms without him being liable to refund the discount. Directors, however, may not issue bonus shares to subscribers for debentures [Welton v. Saffery). Debentures may also be issued repayable with a premium, in which event Directors must be careful that the limit (if any) of the borrowing power be not exceeded, as the bonus must be included in estimating the amount secured {Ro7vell & Son v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue). The bonus, however, need not probably be included if the limiting words are, "Provided that the amount borrowed shall not exceed." Where possible, it is very desirable to issue deben- tures at a premium, in which case the premium may be made use of for paying the expenses of the issue, and the surplus (if any) can be added to the "Reserve" or " Reserve Fund " by being invested. Debenture holders are creditors of the Company, and, therefore, the payment of the stipulated interest // 126 THR DIRFXTOR'S HANDBOOK. is not dependent on the profits. The interest is, in fact, a charge on the revenue, and must be allowed for before the profits are determined, and Directors should require all interest accrued to the date of the balance sheet to be inserted among- the liabilities, and consequently charged against the profits. Should the Memorandum contain the necessary authority, the Directors may charge or mortgage all the property of a Company, including — Book debts not yet due [BloouiP.r v. Union Coal Co.). Uncalled capital (Newton v. Anglo- Australian Invest men f Co.). Directors, however, are not authorised to charge uncalled capital when their powers are limited to charging as follows: — (i) ** Property" or '* property and funds" [Bank of Soutti Australia v. Abrahams). (2) " Property and effects " [San/cey Brook Coal Co.). (3) '' Property present and future " [Re Streatham Estates Co.), (4) ** Real and personal estate" [Colonial Trusts Corporation], Directors should be careful, when money has been borrowed on the security of any of the Company's property, that the facts should be carefully set out in the accounts presented to the shareholders, by only I GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OF DIRECTORS. I 27 placing amongst the assets in the balance sheets the unencumbered assets or the estimated value of the property charged, after allowing for the charge. When a Company issues debentures secured by a covering deed, requiring trustees for debenture holders to be appointed, it has been the practice for one or more of the trustees to be selected from the Board of Directors. In a case where the Articles of Association provided that a Director should not hold a " place of profit under the Company," it was held that a trustee of a covering deed relating to debentures issued by a Company, who was nominated and paid by the Company, was incapable of acting as a Director [Astley v. Neiv Tivoli, Ltd.). Dividends are declared by the Directors with the sanction of the Company in general meeting, and are, as a rule, paid to the members in proportion to the number and amount paid up on their shares, but before declaring a dividend the Directors should refer to the clauses in the Articles of Association relating to the payment of dividends, as some special direction as to apportionment of profits may be there given. In a case where the Articles provided that no dividends should be payable except out of '* realised profits," the Directors were, in a winding-up, held personally liable for having paid dividends out of estimated profits, which is usually done [Oxford Building Society), \ \ / 128 THE director's HANDBOOK. In the case ot Companies registered under Table "A," or with Articles of Association containing similar regulations as to payment of dividends, namely, that they are to be paid to the shareholders in propor- tion to their shares, the division must be made, not according to the amount paid up on the shares, but according to the nominal amount of the shares [Oakbank Oil Co. v. Cruin). When the Articles declare a dixidend to preference shareholders is to be paid '* out of the net profits of each year," and after such payment then a dividend on the ordinary shares, it has been decided that this declaration does not give a cumulative dividend to the preference shareholders [Staples v. Eastniaii Co.) But where the Articles declared that the profits were to be applied, first, in paying a dividend on the preference shares, and, secondly, on the ordinary shares, the preference shareholders were entitled to a cumulative dividend ( WM v. Earle). The above few examples are sufficient to show that Directors must be careful in what manner they divide the profits of their Company among those classes of shareholders who have a claim on them, ev^en when eiirned. They must, however, first of all, before considering the mode of distribution, be thoroughly satisfied that the proposed dividend has been legitimately earned. Directors are forbidden to pay dividends except out I GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OF DIRECTORS. I 29 of the profits arising from the Company's business. The mode of ascertaining these profits is not prescribed by law, and, if Directors are careful to make proper allowance for depreciation on plant, bad debts, or other contingencies, they could not be accused of having improperly paid a dividend where it is subsequently shown the assets were not really worth the value placed upon them at the time. If Directors pay dividends out of capital, they are responsible not only for the amount they may receive themselves, but for the whole of the dividends thus improperly paid ; and, consequentl)/, when Companies go into liquidation, Directors who have been careless in this respect frequently find themselves in the unfortunate position of being called upon to replace money for which they have not had the slightest benefit. J:)irectors of a Company limited by shares may receive payment from a shareholder of any amounts remaining unpaid on his shares, and may pay out of capital interest on sums so paid up in advance of calls, either under Table "A" (if applicable) or under provisions to the same effect in the Com- pany's Articles of Association, provided they do so in good faith and in the honest exercise of the discretion confided to Directors (Lock v, Queensland hivestment and Land Mortgage Co.), ii I30 THE director's HANDBOOK. The Directors of a Company which had not obtained the sanction of the Court to a reduction of its capital distributed a portion of the capital amongst the shareholders, with their assent, and with notice of the fact that the money so distributed was part of the capital. The Company was subsequently wound up, and the liquidator obtained an order that the Directors should replace the money, on the ground that the payment to the shareholders was ultra vires. It was, however, held by the Court that the Directors were entitled to an indemnity from the shareholders [Moxhiun v. Grant). *'The Companies Act of 1867" enacted that a limited Company may, by taking power in its Memorandum of Association, as originally framed or as altered by a special resolution, declare the liability of its Directors or Managers, or Managing Director, may be unlimited. Notice must be given in writing to an intending Director, before he accepts the appointment, that after his election his liability will be unlimited; but, should he not receive this notice, it will not relieve him of his liability. A Director of a Company in which the liability of the Directors is unlimited must be careful that this notice is given to a proposed new Director before he joins the Board, as, should it not be given, each Director is liable to a penalty not exceeding a hundred pounds, and also liable for any damage I GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OF DIRECTORS. 131 which the new Director may sustain by reason of his omission to give the notice. In the event of a Company of this nature being wound up, a Director is liable as though he were a Member of an unlimited Company ; but, should he have resigned his office before the Company went into liquidation, he would only be liable for debts and liabilities of the Company incurred during his tenure of the Directorship, and he is not liable at all should the Company go into liquida- tion after he has ceased for a whole year to be a Director. The remuneration of the Directors is usually prescribed by the Articles of Association, or left to the annual general meeting of the shareholders. They are not servants of the Company, and, therefore, are not entitled to claim remuneration according to the value of their services. If the Articles of a Company fix a minimum sum as the remuneration of the Directors, they are entitled to draw that sum, and the payment of these fees is not dependent upon profits being earned by the Company. The fees are payable out of the assets, even although the Company be insolvent; but should they not have taken their fees previous to the Company going into liquidation, they would not be allowed to claim priority as for salary, although the clerks and servants of the Company would be entitled to claim arrears of K 2 13 THE DIRECTOR'S PIANDBOOK. salary for four months at the date of the winding-up not exceeding £^o. Should a Director be unable to obtain his fees he can sue the Company for them, but, before com- / mencing his action, he should resign his seat at the y Board. "^ Should the Directors themselves, or one or more of the shareholders, consider the Directors should have some remuneration for any past services, a special notice of the intention to propose such a payment to the Directors should be given to all the shareholders previous to the general meeting, otherwise it would not be in order, if voted, without such notice having been given. In the same way, when it is proposed to remunerate a particular Director, notice must be given, as the Directors have no power to give any extra remuneration to one of their own body without special authority. The fees of Directors are chargeable with duty under the "Income Tax Act of 1842," and Directors are not entitled to pay this Income Tax out of the funds of the Company. A clause even in the Articles cannot strictly allow this, for, as by the Act " All contracts for the payment of any such annual payment in full, without allowing such deduction for duty, shall be utterly void," anything which constitutes a contract to pay the remuneration of Directors without the deduction of the duty must be void. f GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OF DIRECTORS. 1 33 There does not appear, however, any reason why shareholders should not permit the payment of the Income Tax, and, therefore, if they pass a resolution voting the fees ^' Free of Income Tax" it is con- sidered the Directors may then pay it out of the funds of the Company. The remuneration of Directors is usually entirely or partially settled by the Articles of Association. In the latter event the shareholders vote it entirely as supplementary to the minimum sum prescribed by the Articles, or the remuneration may be dependent upon profits. When the Company in general meeting vote the remuneration of the Directors, it is as a gratuity and not a matter of right [Ex parte Cannon), When the remuneration is by a percentage of profits, it does not entitle the Directors to claim this percentage on the profit made on the sale of the whole business of the Company [Frames v. Bultfontein Mining Co.), It is advisable for Directors to draw any minimum fees they are entitled to at regular dates. Sometimes, in the case of an unsuccessful Company, Directors allow their fees to stand over, so as to give the Company temporary use of the money, but without intending to forego their fees. This frequently leads to trouble hereafter, and the best plan is to take the fees in the ordinary way, and, unless the Articles do not permit of the Company borrowing, for the i '34 THK director's HANDBOOK. Directors to lend the amount to the Company, taking a special charge or debentures. In a case where the Directors, having power to receive payment of calls in advance, paid into the bank the amount remaining uncalled on their shares, and on the same day appropriated tlie money in payment of their fees, it was held that there had been no dona fide payment of calls in advance, and that the Directors remained liable on their shares [Re VVashinoton Diamond Mi nmg Co.). When the funds of a Company are not sufficient to pay all the creditors in full. Directors who pay themselves in preference to the other creditors can be made to repay the excess {Gaslight Improvement Co.). Directors who take fees in excess of the proper amount payable to them can also be made to refund this excess [Re iVhttchall Conrt). Should the Directors find that any of the clauses of the Articles of Association of the Company are prejudicial to the business, they should instruct their solicitor to prepare fresh sections in lieu of those they think undesirable to retain, and, when settled, summon a general meeting of the shareholders, with the object of a special resolution being passed to alter the Articles as amended. It must, however, be borne in mind that the Articles cannot be so altered as to affect the general constitution of the Company as defined and restricted GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OF DIRECTORS. 135 by its Memorandum of Association. Any clause to this effect would be void if passed by the meeting. Should a Company require further capital, either for the purpose of extending its business or for any other reason, and the Directors have, after con- sideration, decided it shall be raised by an issue of shares, they must first of all ascertain whether the powers conferred on them by the Memorandum and Articles of Association admit of a further issue of shares, and if not they should instruct the solicitor to prepare the requisite notices for calling a meeting of shareholders, together with the resolutions to be submitted to the meeting, which will confer on the Directors the powers they require. They should, at the same time, take into con- sideration the advisability of issuing shares of the same class as those already held by the existing shareholders, or whether the new capital shall be raised by an issue of preference shares. Unless, however, the Articles of Association authorise the issue of preference shares, the Directors should not issue any, as they render themselves personally liable. If the Articles give power to issue a limited number of preference shares, a special resolution of the shareholders cannot increase the number. When preference shares are already in existence, and it is wished to issue a fresh series which will take priority over them, the Directors must ascertain 136 THE director's HANDBOOK. Whether the conditions on which the existing preference shares were issued permit of the proposed new issue. If it was arranged that their rights came first, they cannot be postponed [James v. Bncna Ventura Syndicate). The original preference shares may, however, be postponed if the existing preference shares were issued subject to the right of the Company to issue fresh capital, having such preferences and priorities as should be agreed upon [Pulbrook v. New Civil Service Co-operation). In issuing additional capital, Directors must be as careful in the prospectus as in the case of a new Company; and all statements should be verified by experts, so as to avoid, as much as possible, any chance of an action for compensation under *♦ The Directors' Liability Act, 1890," should the expectations of the Directors not be realised. If brokerage or commission is paid to a stockbroker for placing the shares of a new issue, it must be charged against the Revenue Account of the period in which the issue was made, otherwise the Directors may be held personally liable for the amount. The Act of 1867 authorises a Company, provided it is in accordance with its regulations as originally framed, or as altered by special resolution, to issue share warrants to bearer in respect of either fully- paid shares or stock. GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OF DIRECTORS. 137 These share warrants entitle the bearer to the shares or stock specified on the warrant, and the shares or stock can be transferred from one person to another by the mere delivery of the warrant. The bearer of a share warrant is, subject to the regulations of the Company, entitled on surrendering his warrant for cancellation to have his name entered as a member in the Register of Members. Whenever the bearer of a share warrant claims this privilege, the Directors should be careful to retain the share warrant and cancel it, as the Company would be responsible for any loss incurred by reason of the Company entering in its Register of Members the name of any bearer of a share warrant in respect of the shares or stocks specified therein unless this were done. The stamp duty on these warrants is equal to three times the amount of the ad valorem stamp duty which would be chargeable on a deed transferring the shares or stock if the consideration for the transfer were of the same nominal value, and a Company issuing a share warrant without being duly stamped is liable to a fine of £50. So long as a Director retains his qualification, he is as free as any other shareholder in dealing with his shares, but, as it is in his power, and it is his duty, to see that all formalities relating to the transfers are duly observed, any irregularities would be construed against him in a court of law. 138 niK DIKKCTOR'S HANDBOOK. Under no circumstances may a Company purchase >ts own shares, and Directors should be careful not to do so, as they would not be relieved from responsi- bility were authority given them by an extraordinary general meeting of the shareholders, or even if the Memorandum and Articles sanctioned it, such sanction being- ultra vires. The Articles of Association usually contain a clause empowering the Directors to forfeit the shares of those shareholders who fail to pay their calls within a certain period after the call has become due, provided the formalities prescribed by the Articles have been duly complied with. Before this power is acted upon, the Directors must be very careful the requisite notices have been served on the shareholders, and all the provisions of the Articles been carried out in the smallest detail. The slightest inaccuracy in comply- ing with the conditions is, as against the Company, as fatal as the greatest, should the shareholder whose' shares have been forfeited take proceedings against the Company to have the forfeiture set aside. Should the Articles not contain this power of forfeiture, it can be added by a special resolution passed at an extraordinary general meeting, provided it be passed bond fide with the intention of benefiting the Company, and not with the object of enabling Directors or other shareholders to escape from liability, nor with any other improper intent. GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OF DIRECTORS, 1 39 The power should, in fact, be exercised only when it is considered desirable in the interests of the Company : it should never be put in force for the benefit of a shareholder, as it is clearly the duty of Directors, after making a call, to do their utmost to obtain payment from every shareholder. Should the Directors, in the belief that a shareholder is unable to pay his calls, agree to forfeit his shares on terms, and before carrying out this arrangement discover he has the means to pay, they may refuse to forfeit the shares, and the Court will not compel them to fulfil the contract. Shares, when forfeited, are usually by the Articles deemed to be the property of the Company, and can be disposed of as the shareholders in general meeting may determine ; but, notwithstanding the forfeiture, the member is, as a rule, under the Articles (but not otherwise;, liable to pay to the Company all calls owing upon the shares at the time of forfeiture, unless he has made a special arrangement with the Company relieving him from this liability. A Company is allowed to reduce its share capital by special resolution of the shareholders. This step is frequently taken when a Company has experienced heavy losses, but, as when a reduction of capital is contemplated the Directors should be advised through- out by their solicitor and counsel, it is not necessary to explain the process of carrying the scheme into effect. MO THE director's HANDBOOK. It may, however, be stated that the capital can be reduced in one of the following ways :— I. Diminishing the nominal amount of the shares by writing off paid-up capital, leaving the same amount unpaid. 2. Diminishing the nominal amount of the shares, so as to have a less sum unpaid. 3. Diminishing the nominal amount of the shares by combining numbers i and 2. The resolution for reducing the capital does not come into operation until an order of the Court approving of this resolution has been registered by the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies. '*The Companies Act of 1867" allows a Company by special resolution to subdivide all or any of its existing shares into shares of a smaller amount than is fixed by the Memorandum of Association ; but, of course, the proportion between the amount thus paid and the amount (if any; which is unpaid on each share of the reduced amount must be the same as was in the case of the original share subdivided. A statement of the number and the amount of the shares into which the capital has been divided by such special resolution must be embodied in the Memorandum of Association in the same way as all alterations in the Articles of Association must be inserted in them. GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS OF DIRECTORS. 141 Directors should be very careful to insure all the Company's property for its full value, and they should not, under any consideration, allow any property to remain uninsured because a high rate of premium may be required to effect the insurance. A Director is not bound to run any personal risk of this nature, and should not listen to any solicitations to incur personal liability in this or in any other respect. From time to time the Board should require schedules of the property to be placed before them for the purpose of seeing that the insurance is sufficient ; the best time for this being after the accounts have been prepared for the annual general meeting. Where workmen are employed, it is also desirable Directors should protect themselves against risks under the Employers' Liability Act and the Workmen's Com- pensation Act. Several sound Companies have been established for the purpose of effecting insurances against these risks, and, although the premium may be heavy, still it is the duty of Directors to protect the funds of the Company by effecting the in- surance. The protection of the capital of the Company should be the first consideration of Directors, that of making profits should be only secondary ; and, although many charges on revenue may be saved, still it would be a wrong policy of the Directors to endeavour to improve 142 THE DIRFXTOR'S HANDBOOK. the revenue account at the risk of any portion of the shareholders' capital. Directors who have business transactions with the Company must be very careful they are specially authorised by the Articles of Association. A Director is not allowed to make any profits out of the Company, unless specially authorised by its Articles ; and, therefore, anyone proposing to join the Board for the sake of any business that may accrue to himself or his firm should ascertain whether he would be allowed by the Articles to transact the business, and, if not, he should, before joining, require the' Articles to be altered so as to give him this power, and although transactions may be perfectly boiui fide, and he or his firm may only charge the same as' though they were doing business with other com- panies or firms ; still, if not legally authorised, he could be compelled by a liquidator to refund to the Company any profits he may have made, and probably any Director authorising the transaction would also be held personally liable. Directors or any other persons would be liable for the payment of the whole of the debts of a Company were they to carry on business for a period of six months after the number of its members had been reduced to less than seven, so Directors should be careful that the number should never be less than the statutory seven. WINDING UP. Wo CHAPTER VII. WINDING UP. WHEN the Directors are satisfied that the Company is not carrying on its business to a profit for its ordinary shareholders, they should take seriously into consideration as to whether it is desirable to continue operations on the chance of more favourable conditions of trade arising which would benefit the business. Should they, after delibera- tion, think this not likely to happen, they should endeavour to sell tlie business as a going concern, if the Articles give them the power so to do, or else decide upon putting the Company into voluntary liquidation. In either case they should summon the shareholders to a meeting for the purpose of considering the situation, and for passing the necessary resolutions. It is distinctly advisable for the Directors to take this step in time, and thus avoid the risk of the Company being wound up by the Court on the petition of a creditor, as, when winding up is unavoid- able, a voluntary winding up is, as a rule, far more expeditious and economical. It is, therefore, necessary that Directors should 144 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. understand under what circumstances a Company may be wound up voluntarily. They are as follows :- I. Whenever the period, if any, fixed for the duration of the Company by the Articles of Association expires, or whenever the event, if any, occurs upon the occurrence of which it is provided by the Articles of Association that the Company is to be dissolved, and the Company in general meeting has passed a resolution requiring the Company to be wound up voluntarily. 2. Whenever the Company has passed a special resolution requiring the Company to be wound up voluntarily. 3. Whenever the Company has passed an extra- ordinary resolution to the effect that it has been proved to their satisfaction that the Company cannot, by reason of its liabilities, continue its business, and that it is advisable' to wind up the same. A special resolution is one passed by a majority of not less than three-fourths of the members present at a meeting, in person or by proxy, who are entitled to vote, and confirmed by a subsequent resolution, passed by a majority at a meeting held after an interval of not less than fourteen days, nor more than one month, from the date of the first meeting. An extraordinary resolution is one passed by WINDINCx UP. H5 three-fourths of such members, and does not require confirmation. The first of the above three events practically only happens when the Company has been formed for the purpose of carrying on some business which it is known is only to last for a definite period, and the Articles of Association prescribe the time fixed for the Company's duration. In such a case Directors must be careful to call the meeting before the expiration of this date, so that the Liquidator may commence his duties immediately on the ex- piration of the time named in the Articles. The majority of Companies go into voluntary liquidation by resolutions passed under the second method ; but, where possible, the third method is more expeditious, as it only requires one meeting. On the Directors resolving that it is desirable the Company shall be wound up, the necessary instruc- tions should be given to their solicitor, and it is therefore unnecessary to further describe the process which has to be adopted for summoning the meetings. At the first or only meeting of shareholders, as the case may be, the Directors should be prepared with a full explanatory statement, giving the reasons which have caused them to take this important step. It is then a part of their duty to recommend to the share- holders to whom the winding up of the Company is to be entrusted, and, although it is occasionally 146 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. the practice for one of the Directors or the Secretary of the Company to be selected for this office, the practice is not to be recommended, as it affords shareholders and creditors an opportunity of imputing a desire to the Directors to avoid inquiry into their management or the past history of the Company. It is, therefore, desirable to nominate for the post of Liquidator a Chartered Accountant, who, from the nature of his profession, is naturally experienced in conducting this class of business. If thought desirable, a Committee should be appointed at the same time to assist the Liquidator in his duties, or merely to form a consultative body, with whom he may confer on any matter of special importance. The Directors should see that the resolution for winding up the Company and the appointment of Liquidator is inserted in the London Gazette and in one or two papers published in the locality of the registered office of the Company. On the appointment of the Liquidator the duties of the Directors are at an end, and their powers cease. The books and papers and the official seal should be handed to the Liquidator, and all the property of the Company becomes vested in him. When a resolution has been passed by a Company to wind up voluntarily, the Court may make an Order directing that the voluntary winding-up shall continue, but subject to the supervision of the Court. WINDING UP. 147 A Company can be wound up by the Court under the following circumstances :— (ly When the Directors make default in holding the statutory meeting. (2) When the Directors make default in filing with the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies the Report they are required to issue to the shareholders at least seven days before the statutory meeting. (3) Whenever the Company has passed a special resolution requiring the Company to be wound up by the Court. (4) Whenever the Company does not commence its business within a year from its incorporation, or suspends its business for a w^hole year. (5) Whenever the shareholders are reduced in number to less than seven. (6) Whenever the Company is unable to pay its debts. (7) Whenever the Court is of opinion that it is just and equitable that the Company should be wound up. On the Winding-up Order being made by the Court, one of the Official Receivers of the Board of Trade becomes the provisional Liquidator, and he continues to act as such until the permanent Liquidator has been appointed. L 2 148 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. Should it, however, be thought advisable, in the interests either of the creditors or shareholders, or both, to carry on the business of a Company until it can be disposed of, the Directors should request the Official Receiver to apply to the Court for the appointment of a special Manager. The Directors should then cause to be prepared a statement as to the affairs of the Company, made out in the form prescribed by the Board of Trade, and showing the particulars of the assets, debts, and liabilities of the Company, the names, residences, and occupations of the creditors of the Company, the securities held by them respectively, the dates when the securities were respectively given, and such further or other information as may be prescribed by the Board of Trade, or as the Official Receiver may require. This Statement has to be submitted within fourteen days from the date of the Order for winding up, or within such extended time as the Court or the Official Receiver may for special reasons appoint, and must be verified by one or more of the Directors, and also by the Secretary or other chief officer of the Company, or at any rate by someone who has been either a Director or officer of the Company, or who has taken part in the formation of the Company, at any time within a year before the Winding-up Order was made. Should the Directors be unable to prepare this Statement, the Official Receiver may allow to be paid WINDING UP. 149 out of the assets of the Company such costs and expenses incurred in connection with the preparation of this Statement as he may think reasonable, subject to an appeal to the Court. It is advisable, therefore, for Directors to apply to the Official Receiver for leave to employ a Chartered Accountant to prepare this vStatement on their behalf. Should any Director or other person who may have been required by the Official Receiver to furnish this Statement without reasonable excuse make default in complying with these requirements, he is liable to a fine not exceeding ^10 for every day during which the default continues. Where an Order has been made in a County Court for the winding up of a Company, and a Director or other officer of the Company, having been required by the Official Receiver to submit to him a statement of the affairs of the Company, under Section 7 of "The Companies (Winding-up) Act, 1890," has refused to do so, the Court has jurisdiction to order such Director or other officer to submit such statement, notwithstanding that Section 7, Subsection (5), provides that ** if any person, without reasonable excuse, makes default in complying with the require- ments of this section, he shall be liable to a fine " [In re New Par Consols y Lid.). The Official Receiver may, if he thinks jit, make a report in connection with the formation of the '50 THE director's HANDBOOK. Company, and should, in his opinion, any fraud have been committed by any person in the promotion or formation of the Company, or by any Director or other officer of the Company, which it is desirable to bring to the notice of the Court, the Court may d.rect such persons to attend before the Court on the clay appointed and be publicly examined as to the promotion or formation, or as to the conduct of the busmess of the Company, or as to their conduct and dealings as Directors or officers of the Company. Ih.s examination is conducte.l before one of the Registrars attached to the Winding-up Court. Any Director or other person thus examined is hrst of all sworn, and it is then his duty to answer all such questions as the Court may put or allow to be put to him. He may employ a solicitor, with or without counsel, who are at liberty to put such questions to him as the Court may allow for the purpose of enabling him to explain or qualify any answers given by him. Notes of the examination are taken down in writing and, later on, the Directors and other persons examined have to attend at the Official Receiver s office, when their evidence is handed to them and they are required to go through the same, correct any inac curacies, and sign each page, and their evidence may be used against them should proceedings be taken. The Court has no jurisdiction to order a Director WINDING UP. 151 to be publicly examined under Section 8, Subsection (3), of " The Companies (Winding-up) Act, 1890," unless the Official Receiver has made a "further report" under Subsection (2), from which it appears that, in his opinion, a fraud has been committed by a person in the promotion or formation of the Company, or by a Director or other officer of the Company in relation to the Company since its formation. Further, the power to direct a public examination of the persons mentioned in Subsection (3) does not apply to any one of them against whom a prima facie case of fraud has not been disclosed by the " further report" of the Official Receiver [Ex parte Barnes). In the winding up of a Company one of its Directors was examined under Section 115 of the Act of 1862. The Liquidator, subsequently, in the name of the Company, commenced an action against the Directors for alleged misfeasances, and in this action inter- rogatories w^ere administered for the examination of the above-mentioned Director. Before answering, the Director applied in the w^inding up for liberty to inspect and take an office copy of the deposition taken at his private examination. He had already put in a full defence to the Statement of Claim, and offered to give an undertaking to use his best en- deavours to prevent the communication of the deposition to the other defendants, or their solicitors or counsel. The Court held that leave to inspect and take a 152 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. copy of the deposition ouglit to be granted [Tn re Merchants' Fire Offi,ce). On several occasions the question of the payment of Directors' fees due at the date of a Company going into liquidation has been before the Courts. In a Company where the Articles required the Directors to be shareholders, and their remuneration was such sum as the Company might in general meeting determine, the Court held a Director's unpaid fees were due to him in his character of member, and were to be postponed until the other creditors had been paid in full [Ex parte Camwn). In another case, where the Articles required the Directors to possess a share qualification, but provided that their remuneration should be a fixed annual sum, it was held that, although these provisions in the Articles were only part of the contract between the shareholders inter se, the provisions were, on the Directors being employed and accepting office on the footing of them, embodied in the contract between the Company and the Directors ; that the remuneration was not due to the Directors in their character of members, but under the contract so embodying the provisions; and that, in the winding up of the Company, the Directors were entitled to rank as ordinary creditors in respect of the remuneration due to them at the commencement of the winding up [Ex parte Beck• 1. This Act may be cited as the Directors' Liability Act ,890 to ,8^. '"'' "^'' '■"" '"^ ^""'™'='' ^^ ""^ *'"■ ""^ <-■»■"■'-■- Acts, ,86. 3. — (I) Where after the passing of th.\ An o -i'es per.o„s to subscribe for shies i„^; dt,,;:: r IrrC l^r: ::r:/r'""""" "'■" ^ - *~f 'heco,„pa„yat .,::::' company or\a. haw„;:::i;"::;:r:rc,r : tiv'''-'^'"^ " :^ ™n,ediately or after an interval of time, and eve: ll^or 1 ri: 7 ::;.rir;:p:::;;::r:',r "-- "?"^ '--•- - -- shares, debentures, 'or Z:: " j.k 1^ ^ f T"*'"^' "' '"' THE directors' LIABILITY ACT, 1890. 155 >5tatement, that he had reasonable ground to beheve, and did up to the time of the allotment of the shares, debentures, or debenture stock, as the case may be, believe, that the statement was true ; and (b) With respect to every such untrue statement purporting to be a statement by or coQtained in what purports to be a copy of or extract from a report or valuation of an engineer, valuer, accountant, or other expert, that it fairly represented the statement made by such engineer, valuer, accountant, or other expert, or was a correct and fair copy of or extract from the report or valuation. Provided always, that notwith- standing that such untrue statement fairly represented the statement made by such engineer, valuer, accountant or other expert, or was a correct and fair copy of an extract from the report or valuation, such director, person named, promoter, or other person, who authorised the issue of the prospectus or notice as aforesaid, shall be liable to pay compensation as aforesaid if it be proved that he had no reasonable ground to believe that the person making the statement, report, or valuation was competent to make it ; and (c) With respect to every such untrue statement purporting to be a statement made by an official person or contained in what purports to be a copy of or extract from a public official document, that it was a correct and fair representation of such statement or copy of or extract from such document, or unless it is proved that having consented to become a director of the company he withdrew his consent before the issue of the prospectus or notice, and that the prospectus or notice was issued without his authority or consent, or that the prospectus or notice was issued without his knowledge or consent, and that on becoming aware of its issue he forthwith gave reasonable public notice that it was so issued without his knowledge or consent, or that after the issue of such prospectus or notice and before allotment thereunder, he, on becoming aware of any untrue statement therein, withdrew his consent thereto, and caused reasonable public notice of such withdrawal, and of the reason therefor, to be given. (2) A promoter in this section means a promoter who was a party to the preparation of the prospectus or notice, or of the portion thereof containing such untrue statement, but shall not include any person by reason of his acting in a professional capacity for persons engaged in procuring the formation of the company. (3) Where any company existing at the passing of this Act, which has issued shares or debentures, shall be desirous of obtaining further capital by subscriptions for shares or debentures, and for that purpose shall issue a prospectus or notice, no director of such company shall be liable in respect of 156 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK any s,a,e,„e,U therein, unles,s he .hall have authoriscl the issue of such prospectus or notice, or have adopted or ratified the same. (4) In this section the word '.expert" includes any person whose |>rofession Kives authority to a statement made by him. 4. Where any such prospectus or notice as aforesaid contains the name drect„?;r ";' r'T "' "" "'""™^' °^ -•'-„« agreed to become a dtreeto thereo , and such person has not consented to becon.e a director or has wnhdraw,. his consent before the issue of such prospectus or notice, and has not authorised or consented to the issue thereof, the .brectors of the company, except any without whose knowledge or consent the pr„s,«ctus or notice was issued, and any other person who authorised the issue of such prospectus or notice, shall be liable to in.lemnify the person named as a director of the company, or as having agreed to become a director thereof as aforesaid against all damages, costs, charges, and expenses to which he may be made liable by reason of his name having been insertd in the prospectus or notice, or in defending himself against any action or legal proceedings brought against him in respect thereof. 6. Every person who by reason of his being a director, or named as a director or as having agreed to become a director, or of his h.ving authorised the issue of the prospectus or notice, has become hable to make any payment under the provisions of this Act, shall be entitled to recover contribution as in ca.ses of contract, from any other person who, if sued separately, would have been liable to make the same payment. CALLS ON SHARES. 157 TABLE A. The Regulations for the Management of a Company LIMITED BY SHARES, REGISTERED WITHOUT ARTICLES OF Association. SHARES. 1. If several persons are registered as joint holders of any Share, any one of such persons may give effectual receipts for any dividend payable in respect of such Share. 2. Every Member shall, on payment of One Shilling, or such less sum as the Company in General Meeting may prescribe, be entitled to a Certificate under the common seal of the Company, specifying the Share or Shares held by him and the amount paid up thereon. 3. If such Certificate is worn out or lost, it may be renewed on payment of One Shilling, or such less sum as the Company in General Meeting may prescribe. CALLS ON SHARES. 4. The Directors may from time to time make such Calls upon the Members in respect of all moneys unpaid on their Shares as they think lit, provided that tvwnty-one days' notice at least is given of each Call, and each Member shall be liable to pay the amount of Calls so made to the persons and at the limes and places appointed by the Directors. 5. A Call shall be deemed to have been made at the time when the resolution of the Directors authorising such Call was passed. 6. If the Call payable in respect of any Share is not paid before or on the day appointed for payment thereof, the holder for the time being of such share shall be liable to pay interest for the same at the rate ot Five Pounds per cent, per annum from the day appointed for the payment thereof to the time of the actual payment. 7. The Directors may, if they think fit, receive, from any Member willing to advance the same, all or any part of the moneys due upon the Shares held by him beyond the sums actually called for ; and upon the moneys so paid in advance, or so much thereof as from time to time exceeds the amount of the Calls then made upon the Shares in respect of which such advance has been made, the Company may pay interest at such rate as the Member paying such sum in advance and the Directors agree upon. '58 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. TRANSFERS OF SHARES. 8. The instrument of transfer „f .„y share in the Company .hull be xecuteO hoth by the transferor and transferee, an.l the transferor .shall b deemed to rema.n a holder of such Share nntil the name of the transferee IS entered ,n the Register book in respect thereof. 9. Shares in the Company shall be transferred in the followinj; form :- . ,' '" "^ ' '" consideration of the sum of p„„n,|, paid to me by C.Z)., of , . , ""'" Slid /"/) ,1,. cu r ..t . <1" hereby transfer to the s.lid CO. the Share [or Sh.aresJ numbered standi!!}; in my name in the books of the Company, to hold unto the sai.l CD., his executors, administrators and ass.«"s s.,bject to the several conditions on which I held the sa.ne at the .me of the execution hereof; and I, the said CD., do hereby a-ree to eake .he sa,d Share [„. Shares] subject to the same conditions. As wL^s our hands the .|,,y „,■ .0 The Co,„pany may .lecline to register any transfer of Shares made by a jMe!nber «ho is indebted to them. M. l-he .....nsfer books shall be closed .luring the fourteen day. .m!ne.l,ately preceding the Ordi!,a,y General Meeting in each year. TRANSMISSION OF SHARES. 12. The executors or administrato,-s of a deceased Member shall be the only pe,sons recognised by the C„!npany as having any title to his Share 13. Any person becoming entitled to a Sha,e in consequence of the death, bank,uptcy, or insolvency of any Member, or in consequence of the marr,.age of any female Member. m.ay be registered as a .Member upon such ComiZy '""'""'' '' ™^ ^~" "'"' '" '™' '" "'""■■■"' ''>• "'^ of !u' t"\ 'T"" "'''" ''■■'' ^'"""' '-■"""•-"'' '" ■•' "^^"^ '" consequence o he death, bankruptcy, or in^lvency of any .Member, or in con4.ence of the marnage of any female .Me.nber, may, instead of being registercl h,!nself, elect to have some person to be named by hi!„ ,egis,erc:i as a transferee of such Share. 15. The person so becomincr entitled shall testify such election by executm^^ to his nominee an instrument of transfer of such Share 16. The n^strument of transfer shall be presented to the Company accompanied with such evidence as the Directors may require to pjj be tule of the transferor, and thereupon the Company shall re^iste the transferee as a Member. CONVERSION OB' SHARES INTO STOCK. FORFEITURE OF SHARES. 1.59 17. If any Member fails to pay any Call on the day appointed for payment thereof, the Directors may at any time thereafter, during such time as the Call remains unpaid, serve a notice on him requiring him to pay such Call, together with interest and any expenses that may have accrued by reason of such non-payment. 18. The notice shall name a further day on or before which such Call, and all interest and expenses that have accrued by reason of such non- payment, are to be paid. It shall also name the place where payment is to be made (the place so named being either the Registered Office of the Company or some other place at which Calls of the Company are usually made payable). The notice shall also state that, in the event of non-payment at or before the time and at the place appointed, the Shares in respect of which such Call was made will be liable to be forfeited. Kj. If the requisitions of any such notice as aforesaid are not complied with, any Share in respect of which such notice has been given may at any time thereafter, before payment of all Calls, interest, and expenses due in respect thereof has been made, be forfeited by a resolution of the Directors to that effect. 20. Any Share so forfeited shall be deemed to be the property of the Company, and may be disposed of in such manner as the Company in General Meeting thinks fit. 21. Any Member whose Shares have been forfeited shall, notwith- stan(hng, be liable to pay to the Company all Calls owing upon such Shares at the time of the forfeiture, 22. A statutory declaration in writing, that the Call in respect of a Share was made and notice thereof given, and that default in payment of the Call was made, and that the forfeiture of the Share was made by a resolution of the Directors to that effect, shall be sufficient evidence of the facts therein stated as against all persons entitled to such Share, and such declaration and the receipt of the Company for the price of such Share shall constitute a good title to such Share, and a certificate of propiietorship shall be delivered to a purchaser, and thereupon he shall be deemed the holder of such Share discharged from all Calls due prior to such purchase, and he shall not be bound to see to the application of the purchase money, nor shall his title to such Share be affected by any irregularity in the proceedings in reference to such sale. CONVERSION OF SHARES INTO STOCK. 23. The Directors may, with the sanction of the Company previously given in General Meeting, convert any paid-up Shares into Stock. l6o THE DIRF-CTOR'S HANDBOOK. hnlH ?™ Ti '"'"" '"™ ^™^-"'«' '"•<> Stock, the severa holders of such Stock .ay thencefonh transfer .heir respe .ive in er ts . re,n, or any part of such interests, in the san,e manner'and suLct the a^e regulat.ons as and subject to which any Shares in the Ca^it lit """"' """' "' """'''"''' "■ - -- '-"-o - circumstance! 35. The several holders of Stock shall be entitled to participate in he d,v,de„ds and profits „f the Company, according to th atnoun Tf thetr res,«ct.vc .nterests in such Stock; and such interests sha^l .„ roporfon to the amount thereof, confer on the holders thereof r pe^: Mvel the ame prtv.leges and advantages for the purpose of voting a. Meettngs o. .he Company, and for o.her pun,oses, Is ' would ha bee o that none of such pnvileges or advantages, except the participati™ in e d.v.dends and profits of the Company, shall be conferrcl by Tn u aluiuot par. of consolidate.! Stock as would not if existing in Sha es e conferred such privileges or advantages. sna.cs ha^e INCREASE IN CAPITAL. .6. The Directors may, wi.h the sanction of a special resolution o he Company prev.ously given in General Meeting, incLse its Capital by the ssue of new Shares; such aggregate increase to be of such Amount Tui : :r ter: °f -rrr- -- - -^^ --">■ think e..pedien,. " ' """""" " «'™"' "^ "■' ^ireCors 27. Subject to any .lirection to the contrary that may be given by the oft red o the Members n, proportion to the existing Shares hel.l by them to wh't T'^'^'l '' ""'' '' ""'- '"-"■^'"^ ''- --"" o 'sWs .0 vh ch he Member is entitled, and limiting a time within which the offe,, ,f not .accepted, will be deemed to be declined ; and after the expirat on of such ttme, or on the receipt of ,a„ intimation from the Memu" " horn such nottce is given that he declines to accept the Shares offered the Dtrectors m.ay dispose of the same in such m.an„er as they think mosi benehcial to the Company. ^ ^^^^ as part ffTh""?"" 7r" T' """°" "' "^" ''>^'^^ ^'■^" ""^ ^"-'•ered as part of the ongn.al Cap.tal, and shall be subject to the same provisions w,th reference to the payment .,f Calls and the forfeiture of Sh on non-payment of Calls or otherwise, as if it had been Dart of ,hT , Caphu], P ^'^^ original PROCEEDINGS AT GENERAL MEETINGS. 161 GENERAL MEETINGS. 29. The first General Meeting shall be held at such time, not being more than six months after the registration of the Company, and at such place as the Directors may determine. 30. Subsequent General Meetings shall be held at such time and place as may be prescribed by the Company in General Meeting ; and, if no other time or place is prescribed, a General Meeting shall be held on the first Monday in February in every year, at such place as may be determined by the Directors. 31. The above-mentioned General Meetings shall be called Ordinary Meetings ; all other General Meetings shall be called Extraordinary. 32. The Directors may, whenever they think lit, and they shall, upon a requisition made in writing by not less than one-fifth in number of the Members of the Company, convene an Extraordinary- General Meeting. 33. Any requisition made by the Members shall express the object of the Meeting proposed to be called, and shall be left at the Registered Office of the Company. 34. Upon the receipt of such requisition the Directors shall forthwith proceed to convene an Extraordinary General Meeting. If they do not proceed to convene the same within twenty-one days from the date of the requisition, the requisitionists, or any other Members amounting to the required number, may themselves convene an Extraordinary General Meeting. PROCEEDINGS AT GENERAL MEETINGS. 35. Seven days' notice at the least, specifying the place, the day, and the hour of Meeting, and, in case of special business, the general nature of such business, shall be given to the .Members in manner hereinafter mentioned, or in such other manner, if any, as may be prescribed by the Company in General Meeting; but the non-receipt of such notice by any Member shall not invalidate the proceedings at any General Meeting. 36. All business shall be deemed special that is transacted at an Extraordinary Meeting, and all that is transacted at an Ordinary Meeting, with the exception of sanctioning a dividend and the consideration of the accounts, balance-sheets, and the ordinary report of the Directors. 37. No business shall be transacted at any General Meeting, except the declaration of a dividend, unless a quorum of members is present at the time when the Meeting proceeds to business ; and such quorum shall be ascertained as follows : that is to say, if the persons who have taken Shares in the Company at the time of the Meeting do not exceed ten in number, the quorum shall be five ; if they exceed ten, there shall be M It l62 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. ackled to the above quorum one for every five additional Men.bers up to fifty, and one for every ten additional Afen.bers after fifty, with this linntation that no (luorum shall in any case exceed twenty. ' 3S. n within one hour from the time appointed for the Meeting a quorum is not present, the Meeting, if convened upon the requisition of Members, shall be dissolved : in any other case it shall stand adjourned to the same day in the next week, at the same time and place ; and if at .uch adjourned greeting a - Meeting in every subsequent year one-third of the Directors for the time being, or if their number is not a multiple of three, then the number nearest to one-third shall retire from office. 59. The one- third or other nearest number to retire during the first and second years ensuing the first Ordinary- Meeting of the Company shall, unless the Directors agree among themselves, be determined by ballot; in every subsequent year the one-third or other nearest number who have been longest in office shall retire. 60. A retiring Director shall be re-eligible. PROCEEDINGS OF DIRECTORS. 165 Oi. The Company at the General Meeting at which any Directors retire in manner aforesaid shall fill up the vacated offices by electing a like number of persons. 62. If at any Meeting at which an election of Directors ought to take place, the places of the vacating Directors are not filled up, the Meeting shall stand adjourned till the same day in the next week, at the same time and place ; and if at such adjourned Meeting the places of the vacating Directors are not filled up, the vacating Directors, or such of them as have not had their places filled up, shall continue in office until the Ordinary Meeting in the next year, and so on from time to time until their places are tilled up. 63. The Company may from time to time, in General Meeting, increase or reduce the number of Directors, and may also determine in what rotation such increased or reduced number is to go out of office. 64. Any casual vacancy occuiring in the Board of Directors may be tilled up by the Directors, but any person so chosen shall retain his office so long only as the vacating Director would have retained the same if no vacancy had occurred. 65. The Company in General Meeting may, by a special resolution, remove any Director before the expiration of his jjeriod of office, and may, by an ordinary resolution, appoint another person in his stead ; the person so appointed shall hold office during such time only as the Director in whose i>lace he is appointed would have held the same if he had not been removed. PROCEEDINGS OF DIRECTORS. 66. The Directors may meet together for the despatch of business, adjourn, and otherwise regulate their Meetings as they think fit, and determine the quorum necessary for the transaction of business. Questions ari'sing at any Meeting shall be decided by a majority of votes ; in case of an equality of votes the Chairman shall have a second or casting vote. A Director may at any time summon a Meeting of the Directors. 67. The Directors may elect a Chairman of their Meetings, and determine the jieriod lor which he is to hold office ; but if no such Chairman is elected, or if at any Meeting the Chairman is not present at the time appointed for holding the same, the Directors present shall choose some one of their number to be Chairman of such Meeting. 68. The Directors may delegate any of their powers to Committees consisting of such Member or Members of their body as they think fit ; any Committee so formed shall, in the exercise of the powers so delegated, conform to any regulations that may be imposed on them by the Directors. 69. A Committee may elect a Chairman of their jNIeeting ; if no such Chairman is elected, or if he is not present at the time appointed for i66 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. holding the san.e the Members present shall choose one of their number to 1)0 Chairman of such lIcctinK. ;o. A Commiltee may mcel and a.Ij„u,n as Ihcy think proper. Ottesfons ar,s,n,. at any Meeting shall he ,leterminc,i by a majority of votes of the Men.bers present; and in case o( an equality of votes the Chairman .hall have a second or caslinf; vole. 7.. All acts done by any Meeting of^he Directors, or of a Committee l^T, V' T" '''""" •■■'""'•' "' ' '''''•^'"'' ^'■••'"' no'-i>l-tandi„g th..t tt be aflerwary, w,lh the sanction of the Company in General thet'sharf " '" '' """ '" "' ^''""^"^ '" "^I^-"- '° 73- No dividen.1 shall be payable except out of the profits arising from the busmess of the Company. oul'rf^h'' '"r'^r T'' '''"*•■ ^'«""™'="<«"« ™y 'lividend, set aside out of he proht. of the Company such sum as they think proper as a Rcserve.l lun.l to meet contingencies, or for equalising dividends, or for .epainng „r maintaining the works connected with the business of the Company, or any p.art thereof; and the Directors may invest the sum so set apart as a Reser,.ed Fund upon such securities as they may select 75. The Directors may ■ ••■= ^-i-^ '■> 8'». Any Audil„r shall be re-eligihie on his ,,uitti„f; office "°- 'f ^'"y '-■■■'^"^l vacancy occurs in the oHiee of any Au.litor appointed Me'Ltr';:'-' '"^^'^^^'o^^""" r"'".withca.. an Extraordinary Genera. Aleettn}; for l he |>urpose of supplying the same of Trade Z ""'""'/' ■'"'"'°" " ™"'^' '" """"" ='f<'^--''' ">•-• ''-"I o Trade may on the application of „o, less than five Members of the ^o oli :'";'""', '", ^""""^ "" ""^ ^■"-"' >-'■- -'J '- "- 'enumeration to be pa,d to him by the Company for his services and"-; ^half T'T ,'""" '' """'""' "'"' " ^"P'' "' "^ •^^'-'Cc-sheet, ^outnels I elating thereto. 93^ Every Auditor shall have a list delivere.1 to hin, of all books kept y he Company, and shall a. all reasonable times have access to ,L books and accounts of the Co.npany : he mav, at the expense o e ':rTc;:,r'Tr""'^ "^°'^" ""^™' .o^ssisthlmin'mvestitn; ^d, accounts, an.I he ,„ay in relation to such accounts examine the Directors or any other officer of the Company 94. The Au,litors shall make a report' to the Members upon the :;;:r :■;„:" "■^■'°"'"; r '" -^-^ --' -""■■ "->■ ^^^^ con i^. ,h TT"- "^'^"'^-heet is a full and fair balance-sheet onta,n,„« the particulars re,p,ired by these regulations, and properly dra«n "P - as to exhibit a true aud correct view of the state of he Conpa I" ffatrs, and, ,n case they have called for explanations or information Zn the Doectors, whether such explanations or informati.m have been Hv n by he Dnecors, and whether they have been satisfact.uy . and such r Z shaU ,,e read, together with the report of the Dircco.^ a. the OrdinT; NOTICES. 95. A notice may 1«= sened by the Company upon any Member either nrMe:, ' rf"'' •"™-'^'' "•' "-' - » '-i-^-' -- add.: ej to such Member at his regi.stered i)laee of abode to any Sha,e to whtch persons are jointly entitle.l, be given to whichever of such persons .s named first in the Register of Mentbers ; and noti-eso gtven shall be sufl.cicnt notice to all the holders of such Share 97. Any notice, if served by post, shall be .leemed to have been served at the t,me when the letter containing the same would be delivered in the ord.n.an. course of the post ; and in proving such ser^•ice it shall be sufficien ;:t':r t::;^:„r- ^""'"■"'^' '" -"- - "— >■ — -- ^ QO o Q < 6 u O X w < f^ H W < O :/3 H U BALANCE SHEET. •a ^3 M c o a o I bfi _ c be c i r9 -" '^ '^ 4J I ; -co,.' o " ^' i; y ? rt u ^ t^ = 2 -.o bo' u u -= O ''a rt u o I- I- c -•n'^_ ^ C "^ '^ V. ^ o i- c -S^ •-' P rt c! 13 — " Si? 3 p o rt C - 5" ,w 1- .Ti be 3 ~i ~i c B o 6 .4-1 I/) > c be bo c be , *J <-> -J - o •>c5.icEc>^t5 X. E-i 5-^ o O - I o — a; > -^ J. > 1 O - w z r- H « IT C '3 . a - w ?■ . ^ = < > O H 0- I r "n? ^3 h o c tn o be « be £ en O o c ;; ii c c •- 2. u I u 3 . "^ u ^ i^ — I c V o .'3 en o c go O *J & :" > o tn tn O S c r* o B O o a!: »ic^ rt .1- 43 OJ *- — C u r: 3 o 2 5 ^ " 5 - r" r" vk he 5 i' ►- "Tjo 3 JU -J k- ■^4-> CTi c rt - C o 1- b£*-> 3 ^ -, H I •5 ir :- - ' 4-> « •::'- V, o ^ tn ..^ ^ +j * (fl TS en o <« = ^ O 3 C in ■J c be c .O CJ tn ii ?> rt ^tfj he-ti o .S 5 - o n o rt B o o I-H g in O lO \0 v. I en ad >• t- i X s ?: = J r ^ < - « £: ^ z - a- o • < = oU I I ^ *^ Z 169 o c >> c a B o s S o U aj-c rt u -1 .S acr- rt"? b£. en E^ 5!i 9 u 2 - <^ z 2 3 o o n U 170 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK, INDEX. 171 INDEX. "A," Table Account — Books of ' ■ * • • • ... Accounts — Directors' duties with respect to Adjourned Meeting- Notice of Adjournment — Statutory Meetinjj Agenda Papers... Allotment of Shares- Duties j)rior to Duties after Remarks on Allotment Letters Allotment Money— Keturn of *'* ••• ••• Amendments Annual List of Members Annual Meeting Application for Shares and Allotment Book" Application Money Articles of Association- Directors should settle the Remarks on Attendance Book Audit .. .._ Auditors- Appointment of ... Chartered Accountants should be Directors' duties towards Election of... Names and Addresses nuist be on' Prospectus'" Re-election of . PAGK. ••• ^';7 5.S, 166 <)2 ct seq. ... 108 ... 88 I ... 50 3«. 43 ... 47 ••• 45 ... 99 no ... 89 42 40, 45 •7- "- I 70 102, 167 ... 29 ... 94 102, 167 ... 25 102, 168 Balance Sheet — Form prescribed by Table "A" Presentation of Banking Account — New Company Bankruptcy — Director Shareholder Board Meetings- Duties of Directors al Quorum at Books of Account Borrowing Calls- Mortgage of Payment of, in advance ... Remarks on Capital — Increase of. . . Certificate of Debenture .Stock — Endorsement on ... Certificate of Incorporation — Directors to see, before issue of Prospectus Certificate of Shares — Examination by Directors before issue ... Members entitled to Remarks on Chairman — Duties of Election of... Chartered Accountants — Auditors should be Directors of new Companies should consult Liquidators should be Opening of Books by Cheques — Signing of Commencement of Business — Regulations with regard to Commission for placing Shares PAGE ,. 169 ■ • 99 • 35 68, 164 • •• 158 66 ... 69 53 122 et seq. 126 .81 , 129, 157 .75= 79^^ seq. 160 55 ... 79 • •• 157 ... 52 97 et seq. 96 el seq, ... 29 9 ... 146 ••• 53 50, 117 ... 57 31 I 172 THE DIRECTOR'S HANDBOOK. Committee — Board ••• ... InvestijTatioii C. *" "* ••• ... ontracts — Prospectus, to be mentioned in .. Remarks on Variation of Debenture — Definition of •• • ... Debentures- Issue of ''* ••• .,, Directors- Agenda Paper Agents of Company Attendance Book Auditors can claim information from ""' Bankruptcy of Compensation, liable to pay Consent to act required ... Disqualification of Duties and Powers of Election of... Liability Act, 1890 Managing ..... Managing Partners Officers of Company may be relied upon bv Powers of . . . "* ■•• ••• ... Proceedings of ' " * * ' • ... Profit may not be made surreptitiously by Promoters and Prospectus of new Company and * Qualification of Re-election of '*' ••• ••• Remuneration of '*' *•• ••• ••• Rotation of • • • • • • Securities should be inspected by Solicitors should be consulted by Table '' A," Regulations of, respecting Trustees Unlimited liability of Vacation of seat of PAGE. 73. i^>5 100 26 '^'3 59 124 - - 1244'/ seq. 6;, 72 ... 118 ro ... 94 08, 164 ... 119 9 ... 1 64 I. -. ^\ltt seq. ■■• ... 84 ••• 154 57 113 ... 120 1 64 •■ ••• '65 "'"<. 120, r42 ... 8, 16 10 20 101 ... 131 164 ... 118 8 ... 163 "3- '15 t't seq. ... 130 ... 68 INDEX. 173 Vote of, when interested in Contracts.., AVinding-Up Dividends — Declaration of " •*• ••• ••■ Guarantee of, on Prospectus Payment of Election of Directors Executors — As holders of Shares Extraordinary General Meetings Eees — Directors may sue for Due at date of winding-up Floating new Company Forfeiture of Shares ... Founders' Shares ••• ••• ••■ General Meetings — Poll at Proceedings at Quorum Table "A," Regulations of, respecting Insurance Investigation Committee Letters of Allotment... Lien on Shares of Directors Liquidation Managing Directors Manied Woman — Allotment of Shares to Meetings — Advertisement of Annual Extraordinary General Ordinary- General Statutory Members — Annual List of Register of Memorandum of Association Minimum Subscripton PAGE. 108 IsO lOI, 127 • • • 21 • • • 166 • • • 84 77 • • • 103 ^2 • • ■ 152 • • • 31 138*?/ seq. ■ • • 21 107, 162 86, 161 96, 161 • • • 161 ■ • • 141 • • • 100 • • « 47 • ■ • 122 • ■ • 146 • • • 57 ... 49 -. 95 89, 161 89, 161 86 et seq. 86 ... 110 ••• 54 ... 7, 26 ... 23 174 THE DIRECTOR'S HAxNDROOK. • • • • ( • • • • . ■ • • ••• Minors — Allotment of Shares to Minute Book — Board Meetings Shareholders' Meetings ... Minutes- Shareholders' MeetinfT Misfeasance * • • • • Mortgage — Calls, of Power to • • • ... Mortgage Debentures Mortgages — Register of Notices ... Officials — Appointment of Polls . Preference Shares Preliminary Expenses .. Premiums on issue of Debentures Profits ... Promoters Prospectus — Dating of ... Directors, antl Meetings to settle... Mistakes in • • • Statements required to be printed on Proxies ... • ' • • • • Proxy — Form of ... Qualification — Directors' ... Shares ••• ... • • • ■ • ... ■ • ... • • • •> • • • •• • • ... Quorum — Annual Meeting Board Meeting Quotation on Stock Exchange Reduction of Share Capital Register of Members PACK ... 49 70, n ••• ••• J I Ill ... 119 ... 126 122 ... 124 ••• 54 89 ft seq., 168 56 106, 107 ••• 135 24,31 ... 125 ... 128 ••• 4. 5> 8, 16 22 10 ro 37 23 95. io6 et seq. ... 163 20 20 •• 95 3^, O9 • ... 63 ... 139 •• 54 INDEX. 175 Register of Mortgages Registrar of Joint Stock Companies- Documents to be filed with Remuneration of Directors Reserve Fund Resolution- Special Revenue Account Scrutineers Seal of Company — Custody of... Use of ' • • • - • ■ ■ • Secretary J • • • • • . ... ... Securities — Inspection of Settling Day on Stock Exchange Share Certificate Share Warrants to Bearer • • • • • ■ Shareholders — Bankruptcy of Meetiops of O '•' ••• ,,, Shares — Calls on ••• Conversion into Stock ... Forfeiture of *•• ••• •■• Joint Owners of Preference ... Transfer of Transmission of Solicitors — Desirability of consulting Special Resolution — Copy of, to be filed Definition of Special Settling Day Statutory Meeting Stock Exchange Regulations Transfer Books — Closinif of.. Transfer of Shares I'AGE. 54 20, 22, 34, 50 51, 55, 58 131 166 104 ••• ••• ••• 93 108 ... ... 84 50 ... ... ... wO ••• ... ... 118 61 52 136 ... ... ,,, 158 86 c^ seq. ■•■ 75» 79^^ seq., 157 159 138 et seq. 157 135 73 et seq., 158 158 • • • ... ... o, 8 ••• ••• • ■ . 109 • • . 104 .. 60 .. • 87 Ci et seq. . • . 158 73 et seq. 176 THE director's HANDBOOK. Transfer — Form of Trusts— Notice of Vendors — Directors' position with regard to Variation of Agreements with ... Votes Winding-up PAGE. 158 34 59 1O2 143 DEC 10 jg3o COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES This book is due on the date indicated below, or at the as-pi-oWded-bv" t"he"l bra?v''ru1eforV'"^ "''',"'' ''---inK with the Librarian in charee ^ ""'""' ""^nKement Bnsinf '83 'ixloy The director's handbook J -JU^^»4. C-— .*„ *~**w 1 /, .j-r' (^ ^^ J^*^ 1 0|^ Tif l! 11 Ml ; M" ■ ' > .. I i ! ill' I'l I . f I! ii.-J. -■- .,'1 -iT*/, riiiffi"-' ^vf^,,, ,*• ; 4,,i-i}.^: :::aa,wJaf^''. ,^^'**>'^, ^''•■'' ^^;' fe.