MASTER
NEGA TIVE
NO. 92-80494
MICROFILMED 1992
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES/NEW YORK
17
as part of the
"Foundations of Western Civilization Preservation Project"
Funded by the
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES
Reproductions may not be made without permission from
Columbia University Library
COPYRIGHT STATEMENT
The copyright law of the United States - Title 17, United
States Code ~ concerns the making of photocopies or other
reproductions of copyrighted material..
Columbia University Library reserves the right to refuse to
accept a copy order if, in its judgement, fulfillment of the order
would involve violation of the copyright law.
AUTHOR:
M'CRINDLE, JOHN W.
TITLE:
INVASION OF INDIA BY
ALEXANDER THE GREAT
PLACE:
WESTMINSTER
DATE:
1896
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES
PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT
Master Negative #
BIBLIOGRAPHIC MICROFORM TARHFT
Original Material as Filmed - Existing Bibliographic Record
884.07
M13
<
.3
y-^x-^
ANCIENT INDIA
ITS INVASION BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
1^
ALEX AN I) E K T H E G R E A T
M O U R N I N <;
THE 1) E A r H
O 1' BO U K K V H A L O S
©
ft
o
31
u\
li. r>
3^
'it
THE
Evasion of india
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
AS DESCRIBED BY
. , • • • • •" • • • • • •
ARRlXN;.-'g.C^R-rpi'^, "tflODOROS '
Being Translations of "such portions* of the Works of these and other
Classical Authors ias d^nWAle^bd^ C;a5;paigns in Afghanistan
the PaAjatD,-3indh;Gedrbs!a and Karmania
WITH AN INTRODUCTION CONTAINING A LIFE OF ALEXANDER
COPIOUS NOTES, ILLUSTRATIONS, MAPS AND INDICES
BY ^
J. W. M'CRINDLE, M.A., M.R.A.S., F.R.S.G.S.
LATE PRINCIPAL OF THE GOVERNMENT COLLEGE. PATNA, AND FELLOW OF
THE CALCUTTA UNIVERSITY, MEMBER OF THE GENERAL COUNCIL
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH
NEW EDITION
Bringing the Work up to Date
(2K)e0ftnttt0fer
ARCHIBALD CONSTABLE AND COMPANY
MDCCCXCVl
All rights reserved
)
I '
• • m 1 »
• • • t » » ».
• • • • *
» •
• f • «
• •> •
» » I
• • •
* •
t ■ «
• t
: » • » • . • »
. • •, . • » •
I • • • " I
• • I , • » •
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
List of Illustrations
ix
Preface to Second Edition
xi
Preface to First Edition .
•
XXXV
Introduction, containing a Life of Alexander
3
Arrian . .
57
Q. CURTIUS RUFUS ....
183
Diod6ros .....
269
Plutarch .....
305
Justin .....
321
Appendices —
Notes A-L/ ....
331
Biographical Appendix .
375
General Index ....
417
Index of Authorities quoted or referred
to .
430
805210
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Alexander the Great Mourning for Boukephalos . Frontispiece
By the Autotype Company from a French MS. in the British Museum of the
Life of Alexander the Great y written in the fifteenth century.
FIG.
I. Lysimachos
2. Aristotle
3. Seal of Darius
4. Alexander the Great
5. DiODOTOS .
6. Antiochos the Great
7. EUTHYDiMOS
8. The Tyrian Herakl£s
9. Eumen^ .
10. Ptolemy S6t£r
11. Indian Bowman
12. SoPHYTfis .
Gold coin of Lysimachos (B.C. 306-
281), struck at Lysimachia, in the
British Museum ....
From an intaglio gem, engraved on
sard, in the British Museum
From a cyhnder of chalcedony, in-
scribed " I am .Darius the great
king," in Persian, Median, and
Babylonian, in the Brit. Museum
On a silver coin struck in Thrace by
Lysimachos, in tl^e Brit. Museum .
On a gold stater struck in Baktria, in
the British Museum
On a gold coin (B.C. 222-187), in the
British Museum ....
On a silver Baktrian coin, in the
British Museum ....
On a silver coin struck at Tyre (B.C.
125), in the British Museum
Silver coin of Eumenes I. (b.c. 263-
241), struck at Pergamos, in the
British Museum ....
On a silver coin (B.C. 306-284), in the
British Museum ....
From a coin of Chandragupta II.
(A.D. 395-415), in the Brit. Mus .
From a silver coin, in the Brit. Mus.
PAGE
16
16
29
48
52
52
53
71
120
151
210
280
/
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
■ •
• •
FIG.
13. Greek Warship
14. Seleucus Nicator
15. EUKRATlDfiS
16. ANTI MACHOS
17. AGATHOKLfeS
18. HELIOKLiS
19. Apollodotos
20. As'oKA Inscription .
21. Antigonos Gonatas .
22. Antigonos D6s6n
23. Antiochos II. .
24. DeMETRIOS POLIORKiTfiS
25. Ptolemy III.
PAGE
From a silver coin of Sidon, in the
British Museum . . . .3^6
Obverse of a silver coin struck in
Pergamos, in the British Museum 327
On a silver Baktrian coin, in the
British Museum .... 344
On a silver Baktrian coin, in the
British Museum .... 370
Silver coin of Agathokles, in the
British Museum . . . -371
On a silver Baktrian coin, in the
British Museum . . . • 37^
On a silver Baktrian coin, in the
British Museum .... 372
Reduced from an impression of the
Kalsi Edict by Dr. James Burgess,
CI.F. ..... 373
Silver coin of Antigonos Gonatas
(B.C. 277-239), in the Brit. Mus. . 376
Silver coin of Antigonos Doson (b.c.
229-220), in the British Museum . 377
On a silver coin (B.C. 261-246), in the
British Museum .... 377
Silver coin of Demetrios Poliorketes
(B.C. 294-288), in the Brit. Mus. . 383
On a gold coin (B.C. 247-222), in the
British Museum .... 403
MAPS
Map of Alexander's Route in the Panjab .... Facing 57
Map of the Route taken by Alexander in his Asiatic Expedition 432
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
Since this volume was written, three works have
appeared which not only make important additions to
our knowledge of Alexander's campaigns in Turkestan,
Lower Sindh, and Makran respectively, but which also
serve to correct some current errors with regard to the
identification of places which lay in the route of the great
conqueror, as he passed through these obscure regions.
As the works referred to have been written by scholarly
men, who possess an intimate personal knowledge of the
localities which they describe, the conclusions to which
their investigations have conducted them may be accepted
with confidence, and we propose to give here a brief
summary of these conclusions so far as they concern our
subject. The works are these : I. Alexander des Grossen
Feldzuge in Turkestan, von Franz Schwarz, Munchen ;
2. The Indus Delta: a Memoir chiefly on its Ancient
History and Geography, by Major-General M. R. Haig,
M.R.A.S., London ; 3. A Lecture on " The Retreat of
Alexander the Great from India,'' by Colonel Holdich,
R.E., as -reported in the Calcutta Englishman.
We begin with Turkestan, by which is here meant
the provinces called anciently Baktriana and Sogdiana.
Their reduction, as will be seen from our Introduction (pp.
39-44), occupied the arms of Alexander for upwards of
two years, from B.C. 329-327. The description of the
xn
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
campaigns by which this conquest was effected has
hitherto proved a task of unusual difficulty, due partly to
imperfect knowledge of the geography of the seat of war,
and partly also to discrepancies in the accounts of these
campaigns as given by Arrian and Curtius, who neither
drew their facts from the same original sources nor relate
them in quite the same order of sequence. It is fortunate
therefore that Herr Schwarz, who for fifteen years resided
in Turkestan, and had occasion or opportunity during
that time to visit all its places of importance, sedulously
applied himself to study the antiquities of the country,
and was thus able ultimately to identify with certainty,
almost all the places in which Alexander is reported, by
his historians, to have shown himself. His work is accom-
panied by an excellent map, in which he has traced the
line of the marches and the counter-marches of the
Macedonian troops, while operating in the regions of the
Oxus and the Jaxartes.
Alexander, in the early spring of 329 B.C., left Kabul-
istan, and having crossed the Indian Kaukasos, arrived at
Drapsaka, and from thence continued his march to Aomos
and Baktra. It has never been doubted that Baktra is
now Balkh, but opinions have differed with regard to the
other two places. Schwarz, on sufficient grounds, iden-
tifies Drapsaka with Kunduz, and Aomos with Tash-
Kurgan, near which are situated the ruins of Khulm.
Alexander, marching from Baktra through a frightful
desert, gained the banks of the Oxus, which he crossed
with his army in five days. The passage was effected,
not from Kizil, as has been hitherto supposed, but from
Kilif, higher up the stream— a place which Schwarz thinks
was probably the city of the Branchidai, which, with its
inhabitants, Alexander so remorselessly destroyed. From
the Oxus the expedition advanced by way of Karshi and
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
xin
Jam to Marakanda, the famous city of Samarcand.
Near Karshi, at the hill Kungur-tau, occurred the skirmish
in which Alexander, on this march, received a wound.
Marakanda was situated on the banks of the Polytimetos,
now the Zerafshan or Kohik, which flows westward till its
waters are lost in the sands of the Khorasmian Desert.
Alexander marched thence to the river Tanais — the
Jaxartes or Syr-darya — which formed the eastern bound-
ary of the Persian empire, and separated it from the
Skythians. On the Persian side of this river Alexander
founded a city, which he called by his own name, Alex-
andria. It is agreed on all hands that the site of this
Alexandria was at or near where Khojent now stands.
In this neighbourhood Alexander captured seven towns,
which had shown signs of a purpose to revolt. The
names of two of these have been recorded, Gaza and
Kyropolis. The former Schwarz identifies with Nau,
and the latter with Ura-tube, a considerable city occupying
a commanding position, strongly fortified, and distant
from Khojent about 40 miles. It had been founded by
Cyrus to serve as a bulwark against incursions of the
Skythians. Alexander having quelled the attempted
revolt of the Sogdians, crossed the Jaxartes, and inflicted
a defeat on the Skythians, who had mustered in great
force on their own side of the river. He pursued them as
far as what Curtius calls the boundary-stones of Father
Bacchus, which Schwarz has identified as a pass over
Mogul-Tau, near Mursa-rabat, a post-station, 17 miles
distant from Khojent.
On the heels of this victory tidings reached Alexander
of the terrible defeat and slaughter of his Macedonian
troops by Spitamenes in one of the islands of the Poly-
timetos, and he immediately started for Marakanda, and
reached it after a march of three days. As the distance
XIV
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
from Khojent to Samarcand is 172 English miles, this
march, made in broiling heat, and through a country
without roads, must have tried to the very utmost the
powers of endurance of the Macedonian soldiers, some of
whom were hoplites, wearing their brazen helmets, carry-
ing their shields, and clad in mail. Spitamenes made his
escape into the desert, and Alexander could only sate
his vengeance by ravaging with merciless severity the
beautiful valley through which the river flowed. Schwarz
tells us that he searched in vain to discover the island
which was the scene of the disaster, and it probably no
longer exists. It must, however, he thinks, have been
situated in the neighbourhood of Ziadin and Kermineh.
Alexander, pursuing his way down the river, passed
Bokhara, the Sogdian capital, and advanced as far as
Karakul, beyond which the river disappears in the sands.
He then retired for the winter to Zariaspa. Zariaspa
has been taken to be another name of Baktra, but Schwarz
shows that such an opinion is altogether untenable, and
identifies it, for reasons not to be gainsaid, with Charjui, a
place some six or seven miles distant from where the Oxus
is now spanned by the bridge of the Trans-Caspian Railway.
From Zariaspa Alexander returned to Marakanda,
passing on his route by Karakul, Bokhara, Kermineh, and
Kata-Kurgan. Koinos meanwhile had difficulty in holding
his own against the indomitable Spitamenes, who had
collected at Bagai a body of 3000 Skythian horsemen,
with a view to invade Sogdiana. Bagai is now Ustuk, a
Bokharan frontier fortress, 28 miles below Charjui, but
on the opposite side of the Oxus. The hostile forces at
length came to an engagement. Koinos was victorious,
and Spitamenes, who fled into the desert with his Skythian
horsemen, fell a victim to their treachery. They cut off
his head, and sent it as a peace-offering to Alexander.
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
XV
After the reduction of Sogdiana, Alexander withdrew to
Nautaka, where he spent the winter of 328-327 B.C. This
place has been generally identified with Karshi, but
Schwarz takes it to be Schaar, which lies 40 miles to the
south of Samarcand.
Alexander left Nautaka early in spring, and his next
great exploit was the capture of the famous Sogdian
Rock, in the fortress of which Oxyartes had placed for
safety the members of his family, including his daughter,
the beautiful Roxana, whose charms so fascinated her
captor, that he made her his queen, in spite of all the
remonstrances of his friends. Curtius calls this stronghold
the Rock of Arimazes. Some have identified it with the
steep crags which line one side of the narrow gorge near
Derbent, called the Iron Gate, which forms the only direct
approach from West-Bokhara to Hissar. Schwarz, how-
ever, says that the Iron Gate, through which he has
himself often passed, answers neither to the description of
Arrian nor of Curtius, and his own identification of the
Rock is with a mountain which ascends precipitously from
a gorge similar to that of the Iron Gate, from which it is
some five miles distant in a north-east direction. From
the Rock the expedition marched eastward into the coun-
try of the Paraitakai, the mountainous district now known
as Hissar. Here Alexander's progress was arrested by
another mountain fortress no less formidable than the
Sogdian. It is called by Arrian the Rock of Chorienes,
and by Curtius the Rock of Sysimithres. Its identification
presents.no difficulty, as in all Hissar there is but one
place which answers the descriptions of it, namely, the
narrow pass at the river Waksh, where the Suspension
Bridge (Pul-i-Sangin) overspans it on the way from
Hissar through Faizabad to Badshuan. This pass,
Schwarz tells us, is the most remarkable place to which he
XVI
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
xvii
came in the whole course of his travels. The fort having
been surrendered through the persuasions of Oxyartes, the
conqueror returned to Baktra, by way of Faizabad, Hissar,
Karatag, and Yurchi, from which place he proceeded
down the right bank of the Surkhan to Tormiz, and
thence to the passage of the Oxus at Pata-gisar. On his
return to Baktra, he there made his preparations for the
invasion of India. We have here only further to notice
that Alexander's visit to Margiana, the city now so well
known as Merv, could not have been made, as Curtius
informs us, from Bokhara, which is 215 miles distant
and separated from it by a terrible intervening desert, all
but entirely destitute of wells, but was probably made
from Sarakhs in the earlier part of the march from the
Caspian Gates.
We turn now to Major-General Haig's Memoir on the
Indus-Delta country — a work of which about a fourth
part directly concerns our subject. The sections which
are of this nature discuss the following points: — i. The
Geography and Hydrography of the Delta Country (chap,
i.) ; 2. The Delta at the time of Alexander's Expedition
(chap, ii.) ; 3. The Delta according to later Greek Ac-
counts (chap, iii.) ; The Lonibare Mouth of the Indus
(Append. Note A) ; 5. The general course of the Indus
in Sindh in ancient times (Append. Note C) ; 6. Itiner-
aries in the Las Bela Country (Append. Note D) ; 7.
The March to the Arabios (Append. Note E) ; 8. The
voyage of Nearchos from Alexander's Haven to the
Mouth of the Arabios (Append. Note F).
Our author could scarcely have chosen for his subject
one that is more beset with problems of aggravating per-
plexity. The Indus is notable even among Indian rivers
for the frequency, and sometimes also for the suddenness,
with which it changes its courses. As Colonel Holdich
well observes, " The difficulty of restoring to the map of
India an outline of the ancient geography of Sindh and
the Indus Delta is one which has baffled many genera-
tions of scholars. The vagaries of the Indus, even within
the limits of historic record, .... render this river, even
before the Delta is reached, a hopeless feature for refer-
ence with regard to the position of places said once to
have been near its bank. Within the limits of the Delta
the confusion of hydrography becomes even more con-
founded." In my note on Alexander in Sindh, which will
be found at page 352, I have noticed that the channel
in which the Indus now flows lies much farther to the
west than the channel in which the Macedonians found it
flowing. This westings as it is called, is due to the
operation of the law, first discovered by K. E. von Baer,
that the difference of the velocity of the earth's rotation
at the Equator and at the Poles causes eroding rivers in
the Northern Hemisphere to attack their right bank more
than the left, and to push their beds sideways — while in
the Southern Hemisphere, this action is reversed. From
the Memoir we learn how this law, and the other natural
laws by which its action is modified, have affected the
Indus. The river, we learn, pursues from the confluence
of the Panjnad a very uniform S.W. direction for nearly
300 miles, till it reaches lat. 26° 56', long. 6f 53'. At
this point the river changes its general direction to one
due south, and maintains this for about 60 miles, till
it strikes, in lat. 26° 20', long. 6f 55', the eastern base of
the Laid Hills, just under the peak called Bhago Toro.
Below this point the westing movement of centuries has
now brought the stream to the extreme edge of the
alluvial land, and into contact with the gravel slopes
bordering the hill-country. As the gravel tracts project
in a bow into the alluvial land of Lower Sindh, the river,
XVlll
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
XIX
unable to erode them, is forced to conform to their con-
tour, and to run in a great curve for nearly i8o miles to
Thata. This curve continues through the Delta to the
sea, so that from Bhago Toro to the river-mouth the course
of the Indus forms an arc of some 260 miles, of which the
chord is about 160 miles, and the maximum depth nearly
50 miles. The general result is to give the course of the
river in Sindh the form of the letter S. And, as its
abandoned channels attest, such has been the fonn in
which the river has run in past ages as it approached the
sea. The lower curve of the S had a still bolder sweep
eastward when the river ran far east of its present course,
unchecked by rock or gravel bed, than it has now, when
this part of the course has been shaped by a resistance
which the current cannot overcome. This S-shaped
course of the river in all ages should be remembered in
considering questions of ancient local topography, such,
for instance, as that of the site of Patala. It will then
be seen to be impossible that the river can have run at
the same period in its present course near Haidarabad,
and, lower down through the Gh^ro, or ancient Sindh
Sigara ; also that if Patala was at Haidardbad, the
western river-mouth of Alexander's time must have lain,
not at the western extremity of the sea-face of the Delta,
but much to the east of that point. From these remarks
(which I have abbreviated from the text), it will be seen
that Haidarabad can no longer be taken to be the modern
representative of Patala. Where then was the point at
which, in Alexander's time, the Indus bifurcated, and
Patala was situated ? Major-General Haig says that any
precise identification of this site is hardly within the limits
of possibility ; but, for reasons for which his work itself
must be consulted, he is of opinion that " the ancient
capital of the Delta was most likely not far from a spot
35 miles south-east of Haidarabad " — a spot which happens
to be 160 miles distant from each extremity of the Delta
coast, as supposed to have existed in Alexander's time.
With regard to places which lie farther north than Patala,
the views set forth in this volume do not differ from those
of Major-General Haig. He is, however, of opinion that
the kingdom of Mousikanos was of greater extent than is
usually supposed, and must have embraced the district
of Bahawulpur, which answers better to the description of
that kingdom, as the most flourishing in all India^ than the
country around Alor.
The Delta tract, as taken in the Memoir^ extends from
the sea northwards to the latitude of Haidarabad (25°
25' N.), and is bounded on the east by the desert, the
Puran or old course of the Indus, now dry, and by the
Kori mouth, which is the Lonibare mouth of Ptolemy;
on the west by the outer border of the plains, where the
boundary runs S. by W. for 50 miles to near Thata, from
which point it turns almost due west, and runs for 60
miles more to the sea, near Karachi. This alluvial tract
is everywhere furrowed by ancient channels, some con-
tinuous, both above and throughout the Delta, and others
all but totally obliterated. Our author has a notice of
each of the more important of these channels. Regarding
the Gharo, the western arm down which Alexander and his
fleet sailed, he says that it runs nearly east and west along
the southern border of the Kohistan (hill-country), that it
is thus on the extreme edge of the Delta, and that it has
a course of about 40 miles in length. Referring to the
present channel of the Indus, he remarks : —
"This divides the lower Delta region into two unequal
portions. Of these, the western, and much the smaller, portion
is in the form of an equilateral triangle, having sides of about
64 miles in length, consisting of the river, the coast-line, and the
XX
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
southern edge of the Kohistan plains, and including an area of
about 1700 square miles. This it will be convenient to call the
* Western Delta,' a name the more suitable that all the westward-
flowing branches of the river have, or have once had, their
mouths within the limits of the tract to which it will apply."
• A very interesting question is next discussed — that of
the secular extension of the Delta seaw^ard — and the con-
clusion arrived at, which is, however, conjectural, and
below the estimate of Colonel Holdich, is that from
Alexander's time to 1869 A.D. the advance of the Delta
seaward has been eight miles, or at the rate of rather more
than six yards in a year, this being less than a fourth of the
growth of the Nile Delta in a not much greater period of
time.
We now proceed to show what new light we gain from
the Memoir respecting the voyage of Nearchos from the
naval station in the Indus to Alexander's Haven, now
Karachi. We abridge the account which Arrian has given
in his Indika of this part of the famous voyage : —
Weighing from the Naval Station, the fleet reached Stoura,
about 100 stadia further down stream, and at the further
distance of 30 stadia came to another channel where the sea
was salt, at a place called Kaumana. A run of 20 stadia from
Kaumana brought it to Koreatis, where it anchored. After
weighing from this, a bar (cpfta) was encountered at the spot
where the Indus discharges into the sea, and through this, where
it was soft, a passage had to be cut at low water, for a space of
five stadia. On this part of the coast, which was rugged, the
waves dashed with great violence. The next place of anchorage
was at Krokala, a sandy island, which was reached after a course
of 150 stadia, that had followed the windings of the coast. Near
this dwelt the Arabics, who had their name from the river
Arabis, which separates their territory from that of the Oreitai.
On weighing from Krokala, a hill called Eiros lay to the right,
and to the left a low flat island, which stretched along the face
of the coast, and made the intervening creek narrow. The ships
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
XXI
having cleared this creek, reached a commodious harbour to
which Nearchos gave the name of ** Alexander's Haven." At the
harbour's mouth, two stadia off", lay an island named Bibakta,
which, acting as a barrier against the sea, caused the existence of
the harbour.
Our author thinks that some of the circumstances
described in the above passage supply irresistible evi-
dence that it was through the Ghiro that Nearchos sailed
into the sea. If the obstruction at the mouth of the
river was caused in part by rock, it is certain, he says,
that that mouth cannot have been situated to the east of
the Gharo, for along the whole sea-border of the Delta, to
a depth of several miles, no rock, not even a stone, is to
be found. The description again of the coast adjoining
the bar as rugged or rocky (rpa^eZa) can apply with great
propriety to the plain west of the Gh^ro, consisting, as it
does, of a compact gravelly soil, frequently broken by
outcropping rock, while the description would be utterly
out of place if applied to the low mud-banks of the actual
Delta coast. And further, the statement that the fleet,
after leaving the river, ran a winding course, shows very
pointedly that the Gharo must have been the mouth by
which the fleet reached the sea, since, if it had issued from
any of the mouths east of the Gh^ro, there would have
been no windings to follow, the coast of the Delta being
singularly straight and regular. The fleet probably
entered the sea by the creek of the Gharo known as
the Kudro, not far from the present mouth of which there
is a smaH port named the W^ghiidar, accessible to river-
boats of light draught. Sir A. Burnes, however, who
visited the Delta in 1831, took the Pit! channel to have
been that by which Nearchos gained the sea. He had
seen in that channel what he took to be a rock, and con-
cluded that it was the obstacle which Nearchos had
XXII
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
encountered. It was not a rock, however, but probably
an oyster-bank, for when search was made for it after-
\yards during a survey it was no longer to be found.
The island of Krokala, which General Cunningham
erroneously identified with the island of Kiamari, which
lies in front of Karachi, no longer exists as an island, but
forms part of the mainland. It lay at the mouth of the Gisri
Creek, by which the Malk river pours its waters into the
sea. The headland which Arrian calls Eiros is to be
identified with the eminence called " Clifton," the eastern
headland of Karachi Bay, the " narrow creek " which the
fleet entered on leaving Krokala, is Chini Creek, which
leads into Karachi Bay and harbour. Kiamari thus
corresponds with the " low, flat island " of the Greek
narrative, while Manora (mistaken by Cunningham for
Eiros), exactly corresponds with Bibakta.
We must now briefly notice what is said regarding the
eastern portion of the Delta. Here the most important of
all the forsaken channels of the Indus is the Pur^n, which
can still be clearly traced from two different starting-
points in Central Sindh, one 24, the other 36 miles north-
east of Haidarabad. The two head channels run south-
east for about 50 miles, and unite at a spot 45 miles east
by south from Haidar^b^d. The single channel has then
a course of over 140 miles to the head of the Kori Creek,
the last 50 miles being through the Ran of Kuchchha.
The eastern arm of the Indus, which Alexander in person
explored, was probably some channel running into the
Pur^n not far above the point where it enters the
Ran. On reaching the sea by this eastern branch, Alex-
ander, as Arrian informs us, landed, and with some cavalry
proceeded three marches along the coast. This statement
the Memoir declares to be a fabrication, since such a march
would be an utter impossibility. At the same time, the
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
XXllI
notion of wells being dug in the locality is scouted as an
absurdity.
The Memoir further indicates the route by which Alex-
ander, after starting from Patala to return homewards,
reached the Arabis or Arabios — now the Purali river,
which flows through Lus Bela, and discharges into
Sonmiyani Bay. The eastern frontier of the Arabios
lay near Krokala, and was very probably formed by
the river called the Malir. Alexander, according to
Curtius, reached this frontier in a nine-days' march from
Patala, and the western frontier, which was about 65
miles distant from the other, in five days more. Our
author, assuming that Alexander would not have marched
his army across the comparatively waterless plain of the
Kohistan, but would keep, if possible, within easy reach
of the river or one of its branches, thinks it obvious that
the earlier part of the route would follow the branch which
ran westward — the branch, namely, of which the Kalri and
Gharo formed the lower portion. From the position
which he assigns to Patala, the distance traversed in the
nine-days' march would be 117 miles, while the point
on the Malir where Alexander encamped would be, he
thinks, 7 or 8 miles east by north from Karachi canton-
ments. The distance between the Malir and the Purali,
it must be pointed out, is much greater now than it was
in Alexander's time, for, like the Indus, the Purali has
shifted its course far westward. The coast-line, moreover,
at Sonmiyani has advanced 20 miles, if not more, since
then. Our author, therefore, placing the mouth of the
river rather to the north of the latitude of Liari, suggests
that the point where the army reached the Arabios was
about 10 miles east by north from Liari, and 20 miles
north or north by east from Sonmiyani.
The last Appendix in the Memoir is devoted to a review
b
XXIV
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
XXV
of the narrative of the voyage by which Nearchos in six
days reached the mouth of the Arabics or Pur^li from
Alexander's Haven. It states in the outset that the dis-
covery of the great advance of the coast about the head
of Sonmiyani Bay serves to explain some difficulties in
the account of the voyage which have hitherto defied
solution. We here abridge that account : —
The fleet, on weighing from the haven, ran a course of 60
stadia, and anchored under shelter of a desert island called
Domai. Next day, with a run of 300 stadia, it reached Saranga,
and on the following day anchored at a desert place called
Sakala. Another run of 300 stadia brought it on the morrow
to Morontobara or Women's Haven. This haven had a narrow
entrance, but was deep, capacious, and well-sheltered. The
fleet, before gaining the entrance, had passed through between
two islets, which lay so close to each other that the oars grazed
the rocks on each side. On leaving this harbour next day it had
on the left a tree-covered island 70 stadia long which sheltered
it from the violence of the sea. As the channel, however, which
separated the island from the mainland was narrow, and shoal
with ebb-tide, the passage through it was difficult and tedious,
and it was not till near the dawn of the following day that the
fleet succeeded in clearing it A course of 120 stadia brought
it to a good harbour at the mouth of the Arabios. Not far from
this harbour lay an island described as being high and bare.
The island of Domai Colonel Holdich and others would
identify with Manora. Manora, however, Haig points out,
is even now 4 to 5 miles off from the nearest mainland,
and must have been further in Alexander's time. He
would, therefore, place Domai rather more than 4 miles
due west of the town of Karachi, or perhaps further north.
The fleet, in its course to Saranga, must have rounded
Cape Monze or R^s Muari, but this projection is not
mentioned by Arrian. The position of Saranga, to judge
from the recorded length of the run, must have been near
the mouth of the Hub river, which is 26 miles distant from
the position assigned to Domai. The Hub mouth has
been silted up, and this led, last century, to its port being
abandoned. Our author points out that if K were sub-
stituted for S in Saranga, we would then have in Karanga
a very fair representation of Kharok, the name of the Hub
port. However this may be, he adds, there can be no
doubt that the Saranga of Nearchos was either at the
Hub mouth or a few miles further north.
He then corrects a mistake into which Dr. Vincent and
myself had both of us fallen in our respective translations
of the record of the next part of the voyage — that from
Saranga to Sakala, and thence to Morontobara. Our
versions represented the two rocky islets, between which
the fleet passed instead of taking a circuitous course out
in the open sea, as being in the neighbourhood of Sakala
instead of that of Morontobara. Sakala, Haig thinks, may
be placed a little east of Bidok Lak — a place 24 miles
distant from Saranga, if Saranga be taken to lie a few
miles north of the Hub mouth. Between these two places
the fleet must have passed the island of Gadani, which is
now a part of the mainland, and was probably the Kodane
of Ptolemy.
With regard to Morontobara, our author agrees with
Colonel Holdich in thinking that it is now represented by
the great depression known as " Sirondha," which, though
usually a fresh-water lake, is occasionally quite dry. This,
as the Colonel states, was at no very distant date a com-
modious harbour or arm of the sea, which has extended
north in historic times at least as far as Liari, and possibly
further. He adds that south-west of Li^ri some of the
land formation is probably very ancient, and that west-
ward along the Makran coast there are many indications
of local changes. The distance from Bidok Lak to the
depression is estimated at about 27 miles, which repre-
XXVI
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
sents very fairly the 3(X) stadia of the narrative. Liari is
now about 20 miles distant from the sea.
On leaving the Arabios the fleet, coasting the shores of
the Oreitai, arrived at Kokala, a place near Ras Kachar,
where Nearchos landed, and was joined by the division of
the army under Leonnatus, from whom he received a
supply of provisions for his ships. From Kokala, a course
of 500 stadia brought him to the estuary of the Tomeros,
or, as it is now called, the river Hingol. All connection
between the fleet and the army was thenceforth lost until
the district of Harmozia, in Karmania, was reached. The
coast of the Oreitai extended westward from the Arabios
to the great rocky headland of Malan, which still bears
the name given to it in Arrian, Malana — a distance of
fully TOO miles. The desolate shores of the Ichthyophagi
succeeded, and inland lay the vast sandy wastes of
Gedrosia. Between Cape Malan and the mouth of the
Anamis river in Harmozia, from which Nearchos, with a
small retinue, proceeded inland to meet Alexander, no
fewer than twenty-one names of places at which the fleet
touched are recorded in the narrative of the voyage.
Most of these have been identified by Major Mockler, the
political agent of Makran. We can refer to only one or
two of the more notable. From Cape Malan the fleet
proceeded to Bagisara, which, Colonel Holdich tells us, is
likely enough the Dimizaar or eastern bay of the Urmara
headland. The Pasiris, who are mentioned as a people
of this neighbourhood, have left frequent traces of their
existence along the coast. At Kalama, now Khor
Khalmat, which was reached on the second day from
Urmara, there can be traced a very considerable extension
of the land seawards, which would have completely altered
the course of the fleet from the present coasting tract.
The island of Karbine, which was distant 100 stadia from
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
XXVll
Kalama, cannot, our author points out, be the island of
Astola, but is probably a headland now connected with
the mainland by a low sandy waste. Astola, however, he
takes to be the island sacred to the sun, which Arrian
calls Nosala, and places at a distance of 100 stadia from
the mainland. The nearest land to it is Ras Jaddi or
Koh Zaren, in the neighbourhood of which was Mosarna,
where Nearchos took on board a pilot, by whom thence-
forth the course of the fleet was directed. The next place
of importance was Barna, called by others Badara, and
this Mockler identifies with Gwadar. The following
identifications succeed : — Dendrobosa with the west
point of Gwadar headland, Kophas with Pishikan Bay,
Bagia with Cape Bres, Talmena with a harbour in
Chahbar Bay, Kanate with Karatee, Dagasira with
Jakeisar, near the mouth of the Jageen river, Badis with
Koh Mubarak, and the mouth of the Anamis river with
a point north by east from the island of Ormus. The
distances which Arrian records as run by the fleet from
day to day are generally excessive, especially after it had
left the mouth of the Arabios. ^
We must now resume consideration of the movements
of Alexander himself When we left him he had reached
the banks of the Arabios, at a point distant some twenty
miles from Sonmiyani, or perhaps even higher up the
river. On crossing the stream he turned to his left
towards the sea, and with a picked force made a sudden
descent on the Oreitai. After a night's march he came to
a well-inhabited district, defeated the Oreitai, and pene-
trated to their capital — a mere village called Rambakia,
which Colonel Holdich places at or near Khairkot. The
Oreitai themselves are, in his opinion, represented by
the Lumri tribes of Las Bela, who are of Rajput descent.
From Rambakia Alexander proceeded with a part of his
XXVlll
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
troops to force the narrow pass which the Gadrdsoi and
the Oreitai had conjointly seized with the design of
stopping his progress. This defile was most probably the
turning pass at the northern end of the Hala range. The
Gadrosoi seem to owe their name to the Gadurs, one of
the Lumri clans, from which, however, they hold them-
selves somewhat distinct. Alexander, after clearing the
pass, pushed on through a desert country into the territory
of the Gadrosoi, and drew down to the coast. He must
then, says our author, have followed the valley of the
Phur to the coast, and pushed on along the track of the
modern telegraph line till he reached the neighbourhood
of the Hingol river, where he halted to collect supplies for
the fleet. On this part of the route were the tamarisk
trees which yielded myrrh, the mangrove swamps, the
euphorbias with prickly shoots, and the roots of spikenard.
Beyond this he could no longer pursue his march along
the coast in order to keep in touch with the fleet. The
huge barrier of the Malan range, which abutted direct on
the sea, stopped his way. There was no goat track in
those days, such as, after infinite difficulty, helped the
telegraph line over. He was consequently forced into the
interior. Taking the only route that was possible, he
followed up the Hingol till he could turn the Malan by
the first available pass westward. Nothing here, we are
told, has altered since his days. The magnificent peaks
and mountains which surround the sacred shrine of
Hinglaz are " everlasting hills," and it was through these
that he proceeded to make his way. The windings of the
Hingol river he followed for 40 miles up to its junction
with the Parkan. The bed of this stream leads westward
from the Hingol, and skirts the north of the Taloi range.
Alexander had thus for the first time a chance of turning
the Malan block, and directing his march westward to the
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
XXIX
sea. He therefore pushed his way through this low valley,
which was flanked by the Taloi hills, that rose on his left
to a height of 2000 feet. All the region at their base was
a wilderness of sandy hillocks and scanty grass-covered
waste, which could aflbrd his troops no supplies and no
shelter from the fierce autumn heat. All the miseries of his
retreat, which are so graphically depicted by his historians,
were concentrated into the distance between the Hingol
and the point where he regained the coast. The Parkan
route should have led him to the river Basol, but having
lost his way, he must have emerged near the harbour of
Pasni, almost on the line of the present telegraph. The
distance from the Hingol to Pasni our author estimates at
about 200 miles ; but in Curzon's well-known map of
Persia it appears as if only 150.
From Pasni Alexander marched for seven days along
the coast till he reached the well-known highway to
Karmania. He could only leave the coast near the Dasht
river and strike into the valley of the Bahu, which would
lead him to Bampur, the capital of Gadrosia. This part
of the march probably occupied nearly a month. It has
been doubted whether Bampur was, in Alexander's time,
the capital of Gadrosia, rather than the place on the edge
of the Kirman desert, called indifferently Fahraj, Purag,
and Pura, where there are extensive ruins of a very
ancient date. Colonel Holdich, however, adduces argu-
ments which suffice to set aside the claims advanced in
favour of Fahraj. Bampur is as old as Fahraj, and has in
its neighbourhood the site of a city still older, and now
called Pura and Purag. Besides, in order to reach Fahraj,
Alexander must have passed Bampur, since there is no
other way consistent with Arrian's account. With regard
to the route pursued by Krateros with the heavy transport
and invalids, our author points out that it was probably
XXX
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
XXXI
by the Mulla (and not the Bolan) pass to Kelat and
Quetta. Thence he must have taken the Kandahar
route to the Helmund, and followed that river down to
the fertile plains of lower Seistan, whence he crossed the
Kirman desert by a well-known modern caravan route
and joined Alexander at or near Kirman.
Since the publication of his lecture, of which we have
thus summarised the contents, Colonel Holdich has con-
tributed to the Journal of the Royal Geographical Society
(January 1896), an article on "The Origin of the Kafir of
the Hindu-Kush," which contains some very interesting
notices regarding Alexander as he fought his way from the
Hindu-Kush to the banks of the Indus. The route by
which the conqueror himself advanced with one division
of his army, while the other division, which was more
heavily armed, advanced by the Khaibar Pass, is thus
described by our author : —
*' The recognised road to India from Central Asia was that
which passed through the plains of Kabul, by the Kabul river,
into Laghman or Lamghan, and thence by the open Dasht-i-
Gumbaz into the lower Kunar. From the Kunar valley this road,
even to the time of Baber's invasion of India (early in the
sixteenth century), crossed the comparatively low intervening
range into Bajour; thence to the valley of the Panj-Kora and
Swat, and out into India by the same passes with which we have
now (after nearly 400 years) found it convenient to enter the
same district."
A reference to our notes, B. C. D. E., in the Appendix,
will show that this view of the route is that which we
ourselves had adopted. His views with regard to the
position of Massaga, Aornos, and Embolima are also
coincident with those at which we had arrived. Dyrta he
takes to have been the place now known as Din That
opinion was held by such great authorities as Court and
Lassen, but we have pointed out an objection to it in
p. ^6, n. 3. To Nysa, which, as will be seen by a reference
to our long note pp. 338-340, we have identified with the
Nagara or Dionysopolis of Ptolemy (B. vii., 43), thus
placing it at a distance of four or five miles west of
Jalalabad and near the Kabul river. Colonel Holdich
assigns a different locality.
" The Nysaeans," he says, "whose city Alexander spared, were
the descendants of those conquerors, who, coming from the
west, were probably deterred by the heat of the plains of India
from carrying their conquests south of the Punjab. They
settled on the cool and well-watered slopes of those mountains
which crown the uplands of Swat and Bajour, where they culti-
vated the vine for generations. ... It seems possible that they
may have extended their habitat as far eastward as the upper
Swat valley and the mountain region of the Indus, and at one
time may have occupied the site of the ancient capital of the
Assakenoi, Massaga, which there is reason to suppose stood in
about the position now occupied by the town of Manglaor."
The hill in the neighbourhood of Nysa called Mount
Meros, which was clad with ivy, laurel, and vine-trees, he
identifies with the Koh-i-Mor or Mountain of Mor, and
gives this account of it : —
" On the right bank of the Panj-Kora river (the ancient
Ghoura), nearly opposite to its junction with the river of Swat
(Suastos), is a very conspicuous mountain, whose three-headed
outline can be distinctly seen from the Peshawar cantonment,
known as the Koh-i-Mor or Mountain of Mor. On the southern
slopes of this mountain, near the foot of it, is a large scattered
village called Nuzar or Nasar. The sides of the mountain
spurs are clothed with the same forest and jungle that is common
to the mountains of Kafiristan, and to the hills intervening
between Kafiristan and the Koh-i-Mor. Amid this jungle are to
be found the wild vine and ivy."
In note B. — Nikaia — page 332, some remarks will be
found regarding the Kafirs. Colonel Holdich describes
them similarly, but upholds the view, rejected by Elphin-
XXXll
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
xxxiii
^!
stone, of their Greek origin. The best known of them, he
points out, are the Kamdesh Kafirs from the lower valley
of the Bashgol, a large affluent of the Kunar river, which
it joins from the north-west, some forty miles below
Chitral. He then continues : —
" In the case of the Kamdesh Kafir, at least, the tradition of
Greek or Pelasgic origin seems likely to be verified in a very
remarkable way. Scientific inquiry has been converging on
him from several directions, and it seems possible that the
ethnographical riddle connected with his existence will be solved
ere long. In appearance he is of a distinct Aryan type, with
low forehead, and prominent aquiline features, entirely free from
Tartar or Mongolian traits ; his eyes, though generally dark, are
frequently of a light grey colour ; his complexion is fair enough
to pass for Southern European ; his figure is always slight, but
indicating marvellous activity and strength ; and the modelling
of his limbs would furnish study for a sculptor."
Colonel Holdich subsequently calls our attention to
certain strange inscriptions found in the valley of the Indus
east of Swat, and engraved, most of them, on stone slabs
built into towers which are now in ruins. These inscrip-
tions, on being subjected to a congress of Orientalists, were
pronounced to be in an unknown tongue. They may
possibly, he adds, be found to be vastly more ancient than
the towers they adorned, it being, at any rate, a notable
fact about them that some of them " recall a Greek alpha-
bet of archaic type." He concludes his observations
regarding the Kafirs in these terms : " I cannot but believe
them to be the modern representatives of that very
ancient western race, the Nysaeans — so ancient that the
historians of Alexander refer to their origin as mythical."
I may, in conclusion, advert, in a word, to an article
of great ability, contributed to the Journal of the Royal
Asiatic Society for October 1894, in which the writer
endeavours to show that Alexander reached the Indus by
a widely different route from that which is indicated in
our pages, although it is also the route which, in its main
outlines, has been determined by the best authorities —
men of high military rank, personally acquainted with the
country, and scholars of the greatest eminence. As the
selection of the route advocated was mainly based on
the opinion which the writer had formed as to the
point whereat Alexander had effected his passage of the
Indus, it will suffice to refute his theory if we prove
that his opinion is altogether untenable. In his view, the
Indus was crossed, not at Attock, but much higher up
stream, at a point between Amb and the mouth of the
Barhind river, the Parenos of the Greeks. Now, while the
passage at Attock is that which, from time immemorial,
has been used as the easiest means of access into India
from the west, the passage higher up is much more diffi-
cult and dangerous, for though the river is not there so
wide, its current is much more impetuous, while the banks
are, at the same time, much steeper. Had Alexander
notwithstanding attempted to cross at that point, he
would have had to encounter a desperate resistance on
the part of his determined enemy Abisares, in whose
dominions he would have found himself on reaching the
eastern bank. He made, however, no such foolhardy
attempt either here or afterwards at the Hydaspes. We
find, as a matter of fact, that when he made the passage
he met with no opposition, but was most hospitably
received by his vassal, the King of Taxila, in whose
dominions Attock was situated. The writer, it would
appear, has been led to his erroneous assumption by
applying to the Indus specially the remark in Strabo
(quoted at page 64, note 4) regarding the rivers of
Northern Afghanistan generally, that Alexander wished
to cross them as near their sources as possible. The
XXXIV
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
I
remark, we may be certain, had no reference to the Indus
at all, for Alexander could not but have learned from
Taxiles, who had joined him at Nikaia before the two
divisions of his army separated, where the Indus could
best be crossed. Taxiles, moreover, accompanied the
division which advanced towards the Indus by the
Khaibar Pass, with instructions to make all the necessary
preparations for the passage of the whole army. Could
such instructions have been given if the point where the
passage was to be made had still to be discovered ? A
reference to Baber's Memoirs will show with what ease
that other great conqueror transported his army into
India by using the Attock passage.
A sixth volume^ containing descriptions of India by Strabo and
Pliny ^ together with incidental notices of India by other classical
writers^ is in course of preparation , and will complete the series.
PREFACE TO FIRST EDITION
En inventant I'histoire, la Grece inventa le jugement
du monde, et, dans ce jugement, I'arret de la Grece fut
sans appel. A celui dont la Grece n'a pas parle, I'oubli,
c'est-a-dire le neant. A celui dont la Grece se souvient,
la gloire, c'est-a-dire la vie. — Discours de M. Ernest
Renan du 5 Mai 1892.
This work is the fifth of a series which may be entitled
Ancient India as described by the Classical Writers , since
it was projected to supply annotated translations of all
the accounts of India which have descended to us from
classical antiquity. The volumes which have already
appeared contain the fragments of the Indika of Ktesias
the Knidian, and of the Indika of Megasthenes, the Indika
of Arrian, the Periplous of the Erythraian Sea by an un-
known author, and Ptolemy's Geography of India and the
other Countries of Eastern Asia. A sixth work, containing
translations of the chapters in Strabo's Geography which
describe India and Ariana, is in preparation, and will
complete, the series. I cannot at present say whether
this work will appear as a separate publication, or will be
included in a volume containing new and revised editions
of the three Indikas mentioned above, which are now
nearly out of print, as are also the other two works of the
series.
XXXVl
PREFACE TO FIRST EDITION
In the present work I have translated and annotated
all the earliest and most authentic records which have
been preserved of the Macedonian invasion of India under
Alexander the Great. The notes do not touch on points
either of grammar or of textual criticism, but are mainly-
designed to illustrate the statements advanced in the
narratives. When short, they accompany the text as
footnotes, and when of such a length as would too much
encumber the pages, they have been placed together in
an appendix by themselves. Such notes again as refer to
persons have been placed, whether short or long, in a second
appendix, which I have designated a Biographical Appendix,
In preparing the translations and notes I have consulted
a great many works, of which the following may be
specified as those which I found most useful: —
Droysen's Geschichte Alexanders des Grossen,
Williams's Life of Alexander,
Sainte- Croix's Examen Critique des Anciens Historiens
d Alexandre le Grand.
C. M tiller's collection of the remaining fragments of the
Historians of Alexander the Great,
Thirlwall's History of Greece, vols, vi. and vii.
Grote's History of Greece, vol. xii.
Duncker's History of Antiquity, vol. iv., which treats of
India exclusively.
Talboys Wheeler's History of India.
Le Clerc's Criticism upon Curtius, prefixed to Rooke's
Translation of Arrian's Anabasis.
Lassen's Indische Alterthumskunde.
General Sir A. Cunningham's Geography of Aficient India,
V. de Saint-Martin's Atude sur la Geographic Grecque et
Latine de Vlnde, and his Mimoire AnaJytique sur la
carte de PAsie Ce fit rale et de Ilnde.
PREFACE TO FIRST EDITION
XXXVll
Rennell's Memoir of a Map of Hindoostan.
Bunbury's History of Ancient Geography,
Abbott's Gradus ad Aornon.
Journal A siatique. Serie VIII.
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. New Series.
Mahafify's Alexander's Empire and his Greek Life and
Thought from the Age of Alexander to the Roman
Conquest.
Professor Freeman's Essay on Alexander the Great,
General Chesney's Lecture on the Indian Campaign of
Alexa7ider,
Wesseling's Latin Translation of Diodoros.
Translations of Curtius by Digby, Pratt, and Vaugelas
respectively.
The Notes to the Elzevir edition of Curtius.
Chinnock's Translation of Arrian's Anabasis of Alexander,
and Notes thereto.
Chaussard's Translation of Arrian into French.
Moberly's Alexander the Great in the Punjaub, from
Arrian. Book V.
Burton's Sindh.
Weber's Die Griechen in Indien.
Dr. Belle w's Ethnogi^aphy of Afghanistan.
Sir W. W. Hunter's and Professor Max Muller's Works
on India.
The Translations are strictly literal, but though such,
will, I trust, be found to give, without crudeness of diction,
a faithful' reflex not only of the sense, but also of the
spirit, force, fluency, and perspicuity of the original com-
positions. I have at all events spared no pains to
combine in the translations the two merits of being at
once literal and idiomatic in expression.
In translating Arrian I adopted the text of Sintenis
XXXVlll
PREFACE TO FIRST EDITION
PREFACE TO FIRST EDITION
XXXIX
(2nd edition, Berlin, 1863); and with regard to Curtius,
I found the work entitled Alexmider in India^ edited by
Heitland and Raven, very serviceable, containing, as it
does, exactly that portion of Curtius which it was my
purpose to translate. Both the works referred to contain
valuable prolegomena and notes, to which I must here
acknowledge my obligations.
The Introduction consists of two parts. In the first,
I have pointed out the sources whence our knowledge
of the history of Alexander has been derived, and dis-
cussed their title to credibility ; while in the second, I
have sketched Alexander's career, and added a very brief
summary of the events that followed his death till the
wars for the division of his empire were finally composed.
In the transcription of Greek proper names I have
followed as hitherto the method introduced by Grote,
which scholars have now generally adopted. A vindica-
tion of the method which, to my thinking, is unanswerable,
has appeared in the preface to Professor Freeman's History
of Sicilyy a work which the author unfortunately has not
lived to complete.
The most noticeable change resulting from this method
is the substitution of K for C in the spelling of Greek
names. This should be borne in mind by those who may
have occasion to consult either the Biographical Appendix
or the General Index. I may further note that in tran-
scribing Sanskrit or other Indian names I have in all
cases used the circumflex to distinguish the long d, which
is sounded as a \r\fall, from the short a, which is sounded
as u in dumb. In Sanskrit and its derivative dialects this
short vowel ( ^ ) is never written unless it begin a word,
for it is supposed to be inherent in every consonant. The
letter / with the acute accent represents the palatal
sibilant ( IT ), which is sounded like sh.
Two maps accompany the work, the larger of which
shows the entire line of the route which Alexander
followed in the course of his Asiatic expedition, while the
smaller shows more distinctly that part of his route which
lay through the northern parts of Afghanistan and the
Country of the Five Rivers. For both I consulted the
latest and most authoritative maps, both British and
German, in which these routes have been laid down, and
I found them in pretty close agreement, except with
regard to that part of the route which is traced in the
smaller map. Here I have generally followed the
sketch map of the Panj^b which is given in General
Cunningham's Ancient Geography of India, but have
ventured to differ from him with regard to the position
of the Rock Aornos, of Alexander's bridge over the Indus,
of Sangala, and of the Oxydrakai, whom I have placed,
as in Sir E. H. Bunbury's map, to the south of the Malloi.
The frontispiece to the volume, reproduced from a
fifteenth-century French MS. of the Life of Alexander,
may, it is hoped, appeal to many as a quaint rendering of
a widely "popular" incident.
I cannot conclude without expressing my great
obligations to Mr. Archibald Constable, by whose firm
this work is published, for all the trouble he has taken
in connection with its passage through the press, and
especially with the preparation of the illustrations. I
have also to thank Dr. Burgess for supplying the photo-
graph from which the Asoka inscription on page 373
has been reproduced, and for sundry valuable suggestions
besides. J. W. M'C.
9 Westhall Gardens,
Edinburgh, 1892.
I
INTRODUCTION
B
i
"Of the life of Alexander we have five consecutive narratives, besides
numerous allusions and fragments scattered up and down various Greek and
Latin writers. . . . Unluckily, among all the five there is not a single con-
temporary chronicler. . . . The value of all, it is clear, must depend upon
the faithfulness with which they represent the earlier writings which they
had before them, and upon the amount of critical power which they may have
brought to bear upon their examination. Unluckily again, among all the five,
one only has any claim to the name of a critic. Arrian alone seems to have
had at once the will and the power to exercise a discreet judgment upon the
statements of those who went before him. Diodoros we believe to be per-
fectly honest, but he is, at the same time, impenetrably stupid. Plutarch,
as he himself tells us, does not write history, but lives ; his object is rather
to gather anecdotes, to point a moral, than to give a formal narrative of
political and military events. Justin is a feeble and careless epitomizer.
Quintus Curtius is, in our eyes, little better than a romance writer ; he is the
only one of the five whom we should suspect of any wilful departure from the
truth."— From Historical Essays, by Professor Freeman, 2d series, third
edition, pp. 183, 184.
V
INTRODUCTION
The invasion of India by Alexander the Great, like the
. first voyage of Columbus to America, was the mean^ of
opening up a new world to the knowledge of mankind.
Before the great conqueror visited that remote and
sequestered country, which was then thought to lie at
the utmost ends of the earth, nothing was known regard-
ing it beyond a few vague particulars mentioned by
Herodotos, and such grains of truth as could be sifted
from the mass of fictions which formed the staple of the
treatise on India \yritten by Ktesias of Knidos. A com-
parison of this work with the Indika of Megasthenes,
which was written after the invasion, will show how
entirely all real knowledge of the country was due to that
event. It may even, we think, be asserted that had that
invasion not taken place, the knowledge of India among
the nations of the West would not have advanced much
beyond where Ktesias left it, until the maritime passage
to the East by the Cape of Good Hope had been dis-
covered.
It was early in the year 326 B.C. that Alexander, fresh
from the cgnquest of the fierce tribes of northern Afghan-
istan, led his army over into the plains of India by a
bridge of boats, with which he had spanned the Indus a
little below its junction with the Kabul river.^ He remained
in the country not more than twenty months all told, yet
^ With the exception of Alexander, have sprung firom provinces towards
all the great conquerors who have Tartary and Northern Persia,
crossed the Indus to invade India
1
4 INTRODUCTION
in that brief space he reduced the Panjab as far as the
Satlej, and the whole of the spacious valley of the lower
Indus, downwards to the ocean itself. He would even
have penetrated to the Ganges had his army consented to
follow him, and, in the opinion of Sandrokottos, would
have succeeded in adding to his empire the vast regions
through which that river flows. The rapidity with which
he achieved his actual conquests in the country appears
all the more surprising when we take into account that
at every stage of his advance he encountered a most
determined resistance. The people were not only of a
most martial temperament, but were at the same time
inured to arms ; and had they but been united and led
by such a capable commander as Poros, the Macedonian
army was doomed to utter destruction. Alexander, with
all his matchless strategy, could not have averted such a
catastrophe ; for what is the record of his Indian campaigns ?
We find that the toughest of all his battles was that which
he fought on' the banks of the Hydaspes against Poros ;
that he had hot work in overcoming the resistance of the
Kathaians before the walls of Sangala ; that he was
wounded near to death in his assault upon the Mallian
stronghold ; and that in the valley of the Indus he could
only overpower the opposition instigated by the Brahmans
by means of wholesale massacres and executions. It may
hence be safely inferred that if Alexander had found India
united in arms to withstand his aggression, the star of his
good fortune would have culminated with his passage of
the Indus. But he found, on the contrary, the political con-
dition of the country when he entered it eminently favour-
able to his designs. The regions of the Indus and its
great tributary streams were then divided into separate
states — some under kingly and others under republican
governments, but all alike prevented by their mutual
jealousies and feuds from acting in concert against a
common enemy, and therefore all the more easy to over-
come. Alexander, in pursuance of his usual policy, sought
to secure the permanence of his Indian conquests
INTRODUCTION 5
by founding cities,^ which he strongly fortified and
garrisoned with large bodies of troops to overawe and
hold in subjection the tribes in their neighbourhood.
The system of government also which he established was
the same as that which he had provided for his other
subject provinces, the civil administration being entrusted
to native chiefs, while the executive and military authority
was wielded by Macedonian officers.
The Asiatic nations in general submissively acquiesced
in the new order of things, and after a time found no
reason to regret the old order which it had superseded.
Under their Hellenic masters they enjoyed a greater
measure of freedom than they had ever before known ;
commerce was promoted, wealth increased, the administra-
tion of justice improved, and altogether they reached a
higher level of culture, both intellectual and moral, than
they could possibly have attained under a continuance of
Persian supremacy.
India did not participate to any great extent in these
advantages. Her people were too proud and warlike to
brook long the burden and reproach of foreign thraldom,
and within a few years after the Conqueror's death they
completely freed themselves from the yoke he imposed,
and were thereafter ruled by their native princes. The
Greek occupation having thus proved so transient, had
little more effect in shaping the future course of the
national destinies than a casual raid of Scottish borderers
into Cumberland in the old days could have had in shaping
the general course of English history.^
^ According to Plutarch, seventy
Asiatic cities at the least owed their
origin to Alexander. Of those, forty
can still be traced. Grote thinks the
number is probably exaggerated, and
disparages their importance.
- In saying this, I do not forget
that the Grseco-Baktrian kings at one
time extended their sway in India
even far beyond the parts conquered
by Alexander ; but this cannot be
regarded as having resulted from
his invasion. It might have equally
happened had his invasion been as
mythical as the Indian expeditions of
Dionysos and Herakles. Nor do I
by any means overlook the effects
produced by Greek ideas on the Indian
mind — effects which can be traced in
a variety of spheres, such as religion,
poetry, philosophy, science, architec-
ture, and the plastic arts. On this
subject Professor A. Weber read a
very learned paper, entitled "Die
Griechen in Indien," before the
Prussian Academy of Sciences in July
/f
A I
1#¥
m
6 INTRODUCTION
By this disruption of her relations with the rest of
Alexander's empire, India fell back into her former isola-
tion from all the outside world, and for more than fifteen
or sixteen centuries afterwards the western nations knew
as little of her internal condition as they knew till lately
of the interior of the Dark Continent. The invasion was,
however, by no means fruitless of some good results. As
has been already indicated, it drew aside the veil which
had till then shrouded India from the observation of the
rest of the world, and it thus widened the horizon of
knowledge. It is fortunate that what then became known
of India was not left for its preservation at the mercy of
mere oral tradition, but was committed to the safer custody
of writing. Not a few of Alexander's officers and com-
panions were men of high attainments in literature and
science, and some of their number composed memoirs^ of
his wars, in the course of which they recorded their im-
pressions of India and the races by which they found it
inhabited.! These reports, even in the fragmentary state
in which they have come down to us, have proved of inestim-
able value to scholars engaged in the investigation of Indian
antiquity — a task which the sad deficiency of Sanskrit
literature in history and chronology has rendered one of
no ordinary difficulty. Strabo, we must however note,
stigmatized the authors referred to as being in general a
set of liars, of whom only a few managed now and then
to stammer out some words of truth. This sweeping
censure is, however, a most egregious calumny. It may
indeed be admitted that their descriptions are not uni-
1 890. It is a paper which well deserves
to be translated into our language.
Scholars now rather incline to believe
that, whatever may be the exact de-
gree of the indebtedness of India to
Greece, the ancient civilization of
India was much less original and self-
contained than it was at one time
supposed to be.
1 Patrokles, who held an important
command in the East under Seleukos
Nikator and his son Antiochos I.,
stated, in a work (now lost) which
included a description of India, that
while the army of Alexander took
but a very hasty view of everything
(in India), Alexander himself took a
more exact one, causing the whole
country to be described by men well
acquainted with it. This description,
Patrokles says, was put into his
hands by Xenokles the Treasurer.
On this subject Humboldt thus
writes: "The Macedonian campaign,
which opened so large and beautiful
a portion of the earth to the influence
INTRODUCTION 7
formly free from error or exaggeration, and may even be
tainted by some intermixture of fiction, but on the whole
they wrote in good faith — a fact which even Strabo him-
self practically admits by frequently citing their authority
for his statements. If one or two of them are to some
extent liable to the censure, it must be remembered that
Ptolemy, Aristoboulos, Nearchos, Megasthenes, and others
of them, are writers of unimpeachable veracity.
It is to be regretted that the works in which these
writers recorded their Indian experiences have all, without
exception, perished. We know, however, the main sub-
stance of their contents from the histories of Alexander,
written several centuries after his death by the authors
we have here translated, as well as from Strabo, Pliny,
Ailianos, Athenaios, Orosius, and others.
The following is a list of the writers on India who
visited the country either with Alexander, or not many
years after his death, or who were at least his con-
temporaries : —
1. Ptolemy, the son of Lagos, who became king of
Egypt.
2. Aristoboulos of Potidaia, or, as it was called after-
wards, Kassandreia.
3. Nearchos, a Kretan by birth, but settled at Amphi-
polis, admiral of the fleet.
4. Onesikritos of Astypalaia, or, as some say, of
Aegina, pilot of the fleet.
5. Eumenes of Kardia, Alexander's secretary, who kept
the Ephemerides or Court Journal. His country-
man, Hieronymos, in his work on Alexander's
sux:cessors, made a few references to the campaigns
of the Conqueror.
6. Chares of Mitylene, wrote anecdotes of Alexander's
private life.
of one sole highly - gifted race, may
therefore certainly be regarded in the
strictest sense of the word as a scien-
tific expedition, and, moreover, as the
first in which a conqueror had sur-
rounded himself with men learned in
all departments of science, as natural-
ists, geometricians, historians, philo-
sophers, and artists."
8 INTRODUCTION
/. Kallisthciics of Olyiithos, Aristotle's kinsman, author
of an account of Alexander's Asiatic expedition.
iS. Kleitarchos (Clitarchus), son of Dcinon of Rhodes,
author of a h"fc of Alexander.
9. /\ndrosthencs of Thasos, a naval ofllccr, author of
a Paraplous.
10. Polyklcitos of Larissa, author of a history of
Alexander, full of i^eojnaphical detail;.
I I. Kyrsilos of J'harsalos, who wrote of the exploits of
Alexander.
12. Anaximenes of Lanipsakos, author of a history of
Alexander.
13. Diognetos, who, with Baiton, measured and recorded
the distances of Alexander's marches.
14. Archelacis, a geographer, supposed to have accom-
panied Alexander's expedition,
r 5. Amyntas, author of a work on Alexander's Statluiioi,
i.i'. stages or halting-places.
16. Patrokles, a writer on gcograph)-.
17. Megasthenes, friend of Seleukos Nikator, and his
ambas.sador at the Court of Sandrokottos. kinu
of ralibotlira, composed an Indika.
1 8. Dcimachos, ambassador at the same court in llic
days of the son and successor of Sandrokottos,
author of a work on India in two books.
19. Diodotos of Erythrai, who, like luimcnes, kc|)t
Alexander's Court Journal, and may possibly
have been in India.
Five consecutive narratives of iMexander's Indian
campaigns, compiled several centuries after his death from
the v.orks of the writers enumerated, who were either
witnesses of the events they described, or living at the
time of their occurrence, have descended to our times, and
are respectively contained in the following productions :—
I. The .Anabasis of Alexander, by Arrian of Niko-
mijdeia.
INTRODUCTION 9
2. The History of Alexander the Great, by Ouintus
Curtius Rufus. „ , t •
3. The Life of Alexander, in I'lutarch's Farallcl Lives.
4 The History C)f Dio.l.uos the .Sicilian.
r" The Book of Macedonian History, compiled from
the Universal History of Trogus I'ompeius, by
Justinus Frontinus.
Akkian
Arrian, who is universally allowed to be by far the best
of all Alexander's historians, was at once a philosopher,
a statesman, a military commander, an expert in the
tactics of war, and an accomplished writer. He was
born towards the end of the fust century of our aera at
Nikomcdcia (now Ismiknid or Ismid), the capital of
Bithynia, situated near the hca.l of a deep bay at the
south-eastern end of the Tropontis or Sea of Marmora.
He became a disciple of the Stoic philosopher Ep'kt^tos
(much in the same way as Xenophon attached himself to
Sokrates), and gave to the world an abstract of his
master's lectures, together with an Encharuiwn or manual
of his philosophy-a work which was long and widely
popular. Under the lunperor Hadrian he was appointed
in AD. 132 prefect of Kappadokia. He had not long
filled this office when a large body of wild Alan horsemen
made one of their fonni.lal.le raids into his province.
They had hitherto proved irresistible, but on this occasion
they were completely foiled by the skilful strategy and
tactics of Arrian, who expelled them from his borders before
they had ^secured any plunder. In Rome he was preferred
to various high offices, and under Antoninus I'.us was raised
to the consulship. In his later years he retired to his
native city, where he occupied himself in composing
treatises on a considerable variety of subjects, but chiefly
on history and geography. He died at an advanced age
in the reign of the Emperor IMarcus Aurelius.
His account of Alexander's Asiatic expedition was
41
J
10
INTRODUCTION"
followed by a treatise on India called the Imiiko The
first part of this work, which gives a description of India
and Its people, was based chicny on the Indika of IMc^as-
thcncs ; and the second part, which narrates the fainous
voyage of Ncarchos from the mouth of the Indus to the
head of the Persian Gulf, was based on a journal kept by
Nearchos himself The work is but a supplement to his
History. I Ic speaks himself with noble pride of this jrreat
work " llHs I do assert," he says, " that this historical
record of Alexander's deeds is, and has been from mj-
youth up in place to mc of native land, family, and
honours of state ; and so I do not regard myself as un-
worthy to take rank among tlie foremost writers in the
Greek language, if Alexander be forsooth among the fore-
most n, arms." "Quel delirc de I'amour propre ! " here
exclaims Sainte-Croix. His merits as an author arc thus
wel stated by a writer in Smith's Classical Diet, onary:
This great work (the Anabasis) reminds the reader of
Xenophons Anabasis,not only by its title, but also by the
case and clearness of its style Great as his merits
thus arc as an historian, they are jet surpassed bv his
excellences as an historical critic. His Anabasis is based
upon the most trustworthy historians among the contcm-
poranes of Alexander. ... One of the great merits of
the work is the clearness and distinctness with which he
describes all military movements and operations, the
clrawmg up of the armies for battle, an'>
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
23
in the rear. Alexander drew up his forces on the opposite ^d
bank in the order which he adopted in all his great
battles. Thus the phalanx formed his centre ; he
commanded himself the extreme right, and the officer
in whom he had most confidence the extreme left. To
either wing were attached such brigades of the phalanx
as circumstances seemed to require. The Persians having
observed where Alexander was posted, strengthened their
left wing with dense squadrons of their best cavalry,
anticipating that this part of their line would be exposed
to the first fury of the onset led by himself in person. |
They judged aright. Alexander having sent a detach- j
ment of cavalry across the stream, followed with othe-^
cavalry and a portion of the phalanx. I'ne Tcxs'ians
made a gallant resistance, but were soon beaten. Their
darts and scimitars were no match for the tough cornel
of the Macedonian spears. Their ranks first broke where
Alexander himself in the hottest of the fight was dealing
death and wounds around him. A blow which was
descending on his own head, and which if delivered woi^ld
have proved fatal, was intercepted by Kleitos, who cut off
the arm of the assailant, scimitar and all. The field was
won before either the phalanx on the one side, or the
Greek mercenaries on the other, could come into action.
The Macedonians, after returning from a short pursuit,
closed around the mercenaries and cut them down, all but
2000 who were made prisoners and sent in chains to
Macedonia. The number of the Persians slain was about
1 000 against only 1 1 5 on the other side.
Alexander did not, like most other conquerors after a
victory, plunder the surrounding country, but regarding
Asia as already his own, treated the inhabitants as subjects
whose interests he was bound to protect and promote.
Neither did he at once advance into the interior, but,
acting by a rule of strategy which he was always careful
to observe, resolved to make his rear secure. He there-
fore first reduced all the western provinces of the empire
which Darius after the defeat of his satraps had placed
under the supreme authority of Memnon the Rhodian.
Memnon was a formidable antagonist, both from his skill
in war, and from his having a powerful fleet at his
command, which gave him the dominion of the sea, and
enabled him to threaten at will the shores of Greece and
Macedonia.
Alexander marched from the battle-field to Ilion, and
advanced thence southward through the beautiful regions
of Ionia and the other maritime states, which, in striking
contrast to their present blighted condition, were then at
the height of prosperity — adorned with numerous rich
and splendid cities, which vied with each other in all the
arts of refinement. The terror of his name preceded him,
and these cities one after another, including even Sardis,
the western capital, which was strongly fortified, threw
open their gates to admit him. Miletos, however, and
Halikarnassos, being supported by the Persian fleet,
refused to surrender, and did not fall into his hands until
each had been for some time besieged. After the fall of
Halikarnassos, the rest of Karia, of which it was the
capital, submitted, and then the operations of the first
year of the war were brought to a close by the reduction
of all Lykia. In this province he gave his army some
rest.
The next campaign opened with the conquest of
Pamphylia, after which Alexander turned his march away
from the coast with a view to invade Phrygia, which lay
to the north beyond the lofty range of Tauros. It was
now the depth of winter, but Alexander in defiance of all
obstacles — frost and snow, torrents and precipices, and the
resistance of the fierce Pisidian mountaineers — forced his
way into the Phrygian plains. This passage of the Tauros
at such a season was an achievement not unworthy to
rank with the more celebrated passage of the Alps made
by Hannibal about a century later. After he had cleared
the defiles, a march of five days brought him to Kelainai,
the capital of the greater Phrygia, which was pleasantly
situated where the river Marsyas joins the Maeander, and
I
2^
INTRODUCTION
was embellished with a palace and a royal park. Alex-
ander, deeming its acropolis to be impregnable, made
terms with the inhabitants, and then advanced to the
ancient capital called Gordion, after Gordios, the father
of the celebrated Midas, the first king of the country.
Here was the complicated knot to which the prophecy
was attached that whoever untied it should be Lord of
Asia. It was tied on a rope of bark which fastened the
yoke to the pole of the wagon on which Midas had been
carried into the city on the day when the people chose
him as their king. Alexander either undid the knot or
cut it through with his sword.
On the return of spring he moved forward to Ankyra
(now Angora), and there had the satisfaction to receive
the submission of the Paphlagonians, who at that time
were a very powerful nation. Being thus free to move
southwards without leaving an enemy in his rear, he
entered Kappadokia, and having overrun it without
encountering any serious opposition, he recrossed the
Tauros by a pass that admitted him into the fertile plains
of Eastern Kilikia. The capital of this province was
Tarsos, a flourishing seat of commerce, art, and learning,
built on both banks of the river Kydnos, which was
navigable to the sea. This important city fell without
resistance into Alexander's hands, the satrap having fled
at the tidings of his approach. Here, however, he nearly
lost his hfe, having caught a violent fever by throwing
himself when heated into the waters of the Kydnos*,
^vhich ran cold with the snows of Mount Tauros. After
his recovery he sent Parmenion eastward to occupy the
passes leading into Syria, called the Syrian Gates, and
marched himself in the opposite direction to reduce the
hill-tribes of Western Kilikia. In the meantime Darius,
advancing from the East, had crossed the Euphrates and the
Syrian desert at the head of an army not less numerous
than that with which Napoleon invaded Russia, and was
lying encamped on a wide plain suitable for his cavalry
within a two days' march of the Syrian Gates. Here he
INTRODUCTION
25
waited for some time ready to fall upon the Macedonian
troops and crush them with the overwhelming superiority
of his numbers when they debouched from the defile.
When he despaired of their coming, he marched into
Kilikia through a pass known as the Amanian Gates and
encamped on the banks of the Pinaros which flows
through the plain of Issos to the sea. He thus placed
himself in a trap where he was hemmed in by the moun-
tains and the sea in a narrow plain not more than a mile
and a half in width. Alexander meanwhile had passed
through the other gates into the Syrian plain when he
learned to his astonishment that Darius was now in his
rear. He at once retraced his steps, and by midnight
regained the pass, where from one of its summits he
beheld the Persian watchfires gleaming far and wide over
the plain of Issos. At daybreak he marched down the
pass, and on reaching the open part of the plain made the
usual disposition of his forces, Parmenion commanding the
left, and himself the right wing. Darius had drawn up
his line, which extended from the mountains to the sea,
along the northern bank of the river Pinaros. In the
centre, which confronted the dreaded Macedonian phalanx,
he had posted a body of 30,000 heavy -armed Greek
mercenaries.
Alexander began the action by dislodging a detach-
ment of the enemy which had been posted at the base of
the mountains and threatened his rear. Finding the
Persians did not advance, he crossed the river and charged
their left wing with such impetuosity that he broke their
ranks and swept them from the field irretrievably dis-
comfited. He then wheeled round and brought timely
succour to his phalanx, which the Greek mercenaries of
Darius were driving back with disordered ranks to the
river. The struggle now became desperate, for these
mercenaries, bitterly resenting the state of political degra-
dation to which the Macedonians had reduced their
compatriots in southern Greece, now fought against them
with all the fury that the passions of hate and rivalry
26
INTRODUCTION
could inspire. They were nevertheless driven back, and
the tide of battle surged up towards the state chariot
itself, on which Darius was mounted in the centre of his
line. The pusillanimous monarch no sooner perceived
that his person was in danger than he ordered his
charioteer to turn the heads of his horses for flight.
This^ decided the fortunes of the day ; it was the signal
of his defeat, and his troops, on seeing it, at once broke
from their ranks and fled from the fleld. The cavalry
even, which on the extreme right had victory almost
within their grasp, yielded to the general panic, and
helped to swell the crowd of fugitives. As the narrow-
ness of the plain allowed but very little room for escape,
the vanquished were massacred in myriads. Darius
escaped across the Euphrates, but his treasures and his
family, consisting of his mother, wife, and children, fell
into Alexander's hands, who treated these illustrious
captives with all the kindness and courtesy which were
due alike to their misfortunes and their exalted rank.
He did not pursue Darius, and about two years passed
away before he again met him in battle. His victory had
left Syria and Egypt open to his arms, and these countries
had to be reduced and the power of Persia effectually
crushed at sea before he could advance with safety into
the heart of the empire. He therefore marched southward
to Phoenicia, the seaports of which supplied the Persians
with most of their war-galleys. Parmenion he sent forward
with a small detachment to seize Damascus, where Darius,
before his defeat, had deposited his treasures. The city
surrendered without resistance, and a vast and varied
spoil fell into the hands of the Macedonians. The cities
along the Syrian coast submitted in like manner to Alex-
ander himself, all but Tyre, which sent him a golden
crown, but refused to admit him within her gates. For
this temerity the city of merchant princes paid a dreadful
penalty. Alexander, having captured it after a seven
months' siege, burned it to the ground, and most of the
inhabitants he either slew or sold into slavery. This is
INTRODUCTION
27
considered to have been the greatest of all Alexander's
military achievements. Tyre had hitherto been deemed
impregnable. It was built on an island separated from
the mainland by a channel of the sea half a mile in width ;
its walls, which were of great solidity, rose to an immense
height, and its navy gave it the command of the sea.
The inhabitants, moreover, were expert in arms, and
defended themselves with such spirit and obstinacy that
Alexander found himself unable to overcome their resist-
ance, until he obtained from Cyprus and Sidon a fleet
superior to their own. He had also to construct a cause-
way through the channel to enable him to bring his
engines close up to the walls, and this was a work of
vast labour and difficulty. His merciless treatment of
the vanquished darkly overshadows the glory of this
memorable exploit.
Palestine, with the adjoining districts, next submitted
to the Conqueror. Gaza alone, like Tyre, closed its gates
against him. This city, which stood not far from the sea,
towards the edge of the desert which separates Syria from
Egypt, was strongly fortified, and held out for two months.
Alexander took it by storm, slaughtered the garrison, and
then set out for Egypt. A seven days' march through
the desert brought him to Pelusium. The Egyptians,
who smarted under the bondage of Persia, like the
Israelites of old under their own, hailed his advent as
that of a deliverer, and gladly submitted to his rule.
Alexander proceeded as far southward as Memphis
and the Pyramids, and then embarking on the western or
Kanopic branch of the Nile, sailed down to Lake Mareotis,
and landed on the narrow sandy isthmus by which that
lake is separated from the sea. This neck of land was
faced on the north by the island of Pharos, a long ridge
of rock which sheltered it from all the violence of the
ocean. Alexander, discerning with his keen eye all the
advantages of such a position for commerce, at once
founded on the isthmus the city of Alexandria, which,
as he anticipated, soon became the great centre of trade
/
28
INTRODUCTION
between the eastern and western worlds. His next object
was to consult the oracle of Jupiter Ammon, which was
said to have been visited by Herakles and Perseus, from
both of whom he claimed to be descended. He therefore
marched along the coast for about 200 miles to Paraitonion,
which lay at the western extremity of Egypt. On the
way he was met by deputies from Kyrene, who brought
him valuable presents, and invited him to visit their city.
From Paraitonion he marched southward through the
Libyan desert, and, after some days, reached the large
and beautiful oasis where, embosomed amid thick woods,
rose the temple of Ammon and the palace of his priests.
On consulting the 'oracle he obtained answers, about the
nature of which he stated nothing further than that they
were satisfactory. He then returned across the desert to
Memphis, where he settled the future government of Egypt,
and ordered justice to be dispensed according to the ancient
laws of the country. From Memphis he directed his
march to Syria, and on reaching Tyre, remained there for
some time. While he was in Egypt he had been visited
by Hegelochos, his admiral, who reported that the Persians
had been dispossessed of the islands which they had ac-
quired in the Aegean ; that their fleet had been dissipated,
and that all their leaders were prisoners except Pharna-
bazos, the successor of Memnon, who had died somewhat
suddenly while Alexander was in Phrygia.
Alexander was now, therefore, the undisputed master
of all the countries west of the Euphrates, and could with
complete security turn his arms eastward to bring his contest
with Persia to a final issue. Darius, on the other hand,
who, in the interval between his defeat and the fall of Tyre,
had twice sent an embassy to the Conqueror to sue for
peace and the ransom of his family, on terms which,
though most tempting, had been haughtily refused, was
mustering all his forces to encounter the storm of war
which would sooner or later burst from the clouds that
hung ominously on his western horizon. The army he
now raised was far stronger numerically than that with
INTRODUCTION
29
which he had fought at Issos, and, as it was drawn chiefly
from the east, consisted of the best troops in his empire.
^,
- \
Fig. 3. — Seal of Darius.
He led it from Babylon across the Tigris, and marching
northward along the eastern bank of that river, reached
the plains of northern Assyria, which afforded ample
space for the evolutions of his numerous cavalry. Here
he encamped on a wide plain between the Tigris and the
mountains of Kurdistan, near a village called Gaugamela.
Alexander, having remained at Tyre until his prepara-
tions were completed, started from that city after midsummer
in the year 331 B.C. On crossing the Euphrates at the
fords of Thapsakos, he learned where Darius was, and at
once accelerated his march to find him. He passed the
Tigris, which had been left unguarded, and advancing
southward for a few days, came in sight of the Persian
host, which he found already drawn up in line prepared
for action. It is said that Parmenion, alarmed by the
immense array of the hostile ranks, came at a late hour
to the king's tent and proposed a night attack, and that
Alexander's answer was that it would be a base thing
to steal a victory. His forces amounted only to 40,000
infantry and 7000 horse, yet he was so confident of
success that on the morning of the decisive day his sleep
was deeper and longer than usual.
In its main features, the battle that followed was
but a repetition of the day of Issos. Alexander again
30
INTRODUCTION
commanded the right wing and Parmenion the left. Again
Darius posted himself in the centre of his line, and again
the Greek mercenaries confronted the Macedonian phalanx.
Again Alexander, at the head of the Companion cavalry,
made havoc of the troops which guarded the royal standard ;
and again Darius, terror-struck at his near approach,
ignominiously fled from the field. His flight gave once
more the signal of defeat, and that too, as at Issos, just
at the time when his cavalry on the right had made the
position of Parmenion most critical.^ Alexander was re-
called from the pursuit of Darius, whom he was eagerly
bent on capturing, by a messenger sent by Parmenion
pressing for instant aid. He at once turned back. On
his way he met the Persian and Parthian cavalry and the
Indian troops now in full retreat. A combat close and
hot followed. The fugitives were for the most part
killed, but sold their lives dearly. On returning to the
field Alexander found that his left wing was no longer
in distress, but putting the enemy to rout, and he there-
fore started once more in pursuit of Darius. The fugitive
escaped, however, to Ekbatana, the capital in former
days of the Median kings.
Accounts differ as to the numbers that were killed in
this battle. A,rrian says, absurdly enough, that 300,000
of the Persians were slain, and a greater number taken
prisoners. Diodoros reduces the amount to 90,000, and
Curtius to 40,000. The loss again on Alexander's side
is reckoned by Arrian at 100, by Curtius at 300, and by
Diodoros at 500.^
^ The Macedonian line in this part
of the field being broken, some of the
Indians and of the Persian cavalry
burst through the gap and fought
their way to the enemy's baggage,
where a desperate conflict ensued. —
Arrian, iii. 14.
- General Chesney, commenting
lately on these numbers, remarks
that '• numbers without discipline are,
after a certain point, worse than use-
less, the men only get in each others'
way. This was especially the case in
the battles of old times fought at close
quarters." " The biographers of Sir
Charles Napier," he continues, "have
made a great point of the circum-
stance that at the battle of Meani the
British force of less than 3000 men
was opposed by 40,000 of the enemy
who fought desperately for several
hours. Now, the whole British loss
in killed and wounded was under 300,
so that, assuming every wound to
have been inflicted by a separate
sword or bullet, it follows that out of
INTRODUCTION 31
Alexander pursued the fugitive troops as far as Arbela
— the place which has given its name to the battle, though
it was sixty miles distant from the field whereon it was
fought. Here he found the baggage of Darius, and having
enriched himself with its spoils, he advanced southward to
Babylon. This great capital, which once gave law to all
the nations of the East, had under the rule of the Achai-
menids gradually declined both in wealth and importance.
Its inhabitants, like the Egyptians, detested their Persian
masters, who oppressed them and persecuted their religion.
They issued therefore from their gates in a joyful proces-
sion to welcome the victor and present him with gifts. His
first acts on entering the city were well calculated to make
a favourable impression on their minds. He ordered the
temple of Belus to be rebuilt, honoured that deity with a
public sacrifice according to the Chaldaean ritual, and re-
stored to his priests the immense revenues with which
they had been endowed by the Assyrian kings.^
Alexander thus found himself the master of a more
spacious empire than any the world had yet seen. No
king or conqueror had ever before stood on such a giddy
the 40,000 desperate fighters, 39,700
contributed nothing to the fighting."
In another passage he points out that
an ancient battle was in some respects
a much more formidable thing than a
modern one. In the battle of old
days the absence of noise, except the
words of command, the tramp of men,
and the clashing of armour, above all
the closeness of one's adversary, must
have been of a kind to try the nerves
much more than the rattle of musketry,
the crashing of shells, and the thunder
of the artillery in a modern battle.
What we shall never get back to is
hand-to-hand fighting at close quarters.
It was this that made a battle so de-
cisive in olden days, and caused the
tremendous slaughter that used to
be the fate of the beaten side. An
ancient battle was really a very short
^affair. After the marshalling of the
roops and the preliminary skirmish-
tg of the cavalry and the archery
" actice of the light troops, in which
a good deal of time would be taken
up, the business must have been de-
cided in a very few minutes when
once the infantry actually engaged.
The fact is that when two bodies of
men meet with sword or spear, a
prolonged contest is from the nature
of the case impossible. In modern
warfare when a battle is lost, a large
part of the defeated army is already
at a distance and gets oft' unharmed.
But there was no escape for the man
in armour, and when he turned his
back his shield was no defence.
^ "Against Phoenicians, Eg>'ptians,
Babylonians, Alexander had no mis-
sion of vengeance ; he might rather
call on them to help him against the
common foe. ... If the gods of
Attica had been wronged and insulted
(by the Persians) so had the gods of
Memphis and Babylon". — Prof. Free-
man, Historical Essays , ii. pp. 202,
203.
32
INTRODUCTION
pinnacle of power. As he had made his way to this
supreme height before he had yet reached those years
or experienced those vicissitudes of fortune which have a
sobering effect on the mind, it is not surprising that, as in
the case of Napoleon, whose genius was at many points in
close touch with his own, and who, at a like early age, had
amazed the world with his deeds of arms, unbounded
success tended to deteriorate his character. He is found
henceforth becoming more arrogant and despotic, more
suspicious, and avid of flattery, while less tolerant of advice
or remonstrance, and less capable of controlling the
violence of his passions. The simple style of living in
which he had been brought up seemed no longer to
please him, and he began to assume all the pomp and
splendour with which an oriental despot loves to sur-
round himself,^ an innovation in his habits which deeply
mortified the pride of the Macedonians. It may be urged
in his defence that he may have made the change less
from any real inclination than from the politic motive
of conciliating his new subjects by conforming to their
tastes and habits.
Before leaving Babylon he settled the affairs of Assyria
and its dependencies in accordance with a principle on
which he generally acted, committing the civil administra-
tion to a native ruler, but leaving the command of the
forces and the collection of the revenue in the hands
of Macedonian officers. He then marched eastward,
and in twenty days reached Sousa, the favourite capital
of the Persian kings. Rich as Babylon was, its treasures
were as nothing compared with those which had been
here accumulated. The sums contained in the treasury
amounted to 40,000 talents of uncoined gold and silver,
and 9000 talents of coined gold, and there was other
booty besides of immense value, including the spoils
which Xerxes had carried off from Greece — the recovery
^ ** From this unhappy time all the upon him till he could bear neither^
wont failings of Alexander become restraint nor opposition." — Prof. Free -
more strongly developed. . . . Im- man, Historical Essays^ ii. p. 206.
petuosity and self-exaltation now grew
INTRODUCTION
33
J* A.
of which gratified beyond measure the patriotic feelings
of the army.
From Sousa Alexander took the road to Persepolis,
the ancient capital of the Persians, a rich and splendid
city lying to the south-east of Sousa, in the beautiful vale
of Persis which was fertilised by the streams descending
from Mount Zagros, the Medos, and the Araxes.i On his
route he passed through the hill-country of the Ouxians,
which like that of the Pisidians, was occupied by warlike
and predatory tribes. These mountaineers were nominally
subject to Persia, but they nevertheless at one of their
defiles exacted toll even from the Great King himself
whenever he passed through their country in going
between his two capitals. They beset this defile with
the whole of their effective force to levy the customary
tribute from Alexander, who payed them what he called
their dues in the form of a crushing defeat.^ He then
plundered their villages, and, having received their sub-
mission, pressed forward by way of the formidable pass
called the Persian Gates.^ Here the satrap Ariobarzanes,
at the head of more than 40,000 men, tried but in vain
to arrest his progress. Alexander, with his usual skill
and courage forced the position, and meeting with no
further resistance reached Persepolis, where no defence
was attempted. He not only permitted his soldiers to
plunder this ancient capital, but, if we may believe
the story, with which Dryden's Ode has made us familiar,
set fire with his own hands in a drunken revel to the
royal palace, a structure of supreme magnificence, as
its ruins, which are still to be seen, attest. It is more
probable, however, that he burned it from motives of
policy, partly to show the Persians how absolutely he
was now their master, and partly to avenge Greece for
the destruction of her temples by Xerxes. In the
royal treasury he found the vast sum of 120,000 talents,
1 The Medos is now the Polvar » jhe narrow defile near Kalek
and the Araxes the Bund-Amir. Safed (the white fort), some fifty
Knmeir places the Ouxian passes miles to the north-west of Shiraz.
to the north-west of Bebehait.
/
D
/
34
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
which falls little short of thirty million pounds of our
money. As it was now mid-winter he here gave his
army some respite from their toils. He gave himself,
however, no rest, but led a detachment to Pasargadai,
the primitive seat of the Achaimenids, which contained an
august monument, the tomb of Cyrus, which still exists,
and a rich treasury which he plundered.^ He next
assailed the Mardians, and marching over ice and snow,
reduced their mountain fastnesses and compelled their
submission.
In the spring of 330 B.C. he resumed the pursuit of
Darius, who was still at Ekbatana making vain efforts
to raise another army. The fallen monarch, on hearing
that the enemy was again moving against him and had
reached Media, fled eastward hoping to find protection
and safety in the far remote province of Baktria, of
which his kinsman Bessos was the satrap. The capital
which he had left was the summer residence of the
Persian kings, and was noted for the enormous strength
of its citadel. Alexander therefore ordered Parmenion
to transport thither, as to a place of peculiar security,
the treasures which had been seized at the other capitals,
and to confide their custody to a strong guard of Mace-
donian soldiers.2 This done, he set out with a light
detachment of troops in the hope of overtaking the
fugitive king before he passed through the Kaspian
Gates. At Rhagai, which was a day's rapid march from
that pass, he learned that Darius had escaped beyond it,
and he therefore halted for five days to recruit his
troops. On renewing the pursuit and reaching the open
country beyond the gates, he learned that the Persian
officers who were escorting their sovereign had conspired
3S
X ^ Curzon thinks that Pasargadai lay
to the north-east of Persepolis at a
distance of some thirty miles. For a
discussion regarding their ruins and
the tomb of Cyrus see his great work
on Persia just published, vol. ii. pp.
70-92.
- The reler.se of these enormous
treasure-hoards produced such effects
as resulted in recent times from the
discoveries of gold in California and
Australia. The prices of all commo-
dities were greatly enhanced, and
prosperity advanced by leaps and
bounds.
against him and deprived him of his liberty. Greatly
fearing now lest the traitors had some deadlier purpose
in view, he made incredible exertions to overtake them,
and he came up with them on the fourth day — but all
too late. The conspirators, among whom was Bessos,
finding that the pursuit was gaining upon them, mortally
wounded the hapless king, who breathed his last before
Alexander reached him. " Such," says Arrian, " was the
end of Darius, who as a warrior was singularly remiss and
injudicious. In other respects his character is blameless,
either because he was just by nature, or because he had
no opportunity of displaying the contrary, as his accession
and the Macedonian invasion were simultaneous. It was
not in his power, therefore, to oppress his subjects, as his
danger was greater than theirs. His reign was one un-
broken series of disasters, and he was at last treacherously
assassinated by his most intimate connections. At his death
he was about fifty years old." Alexander sent his body
into Persia with orders that it should be buried with all
due honours in the royal sepulchre. Bessos escaped into
his own satrapy where he assumed the upright tiara, the
distinguishing emblem of Persian royalty, and took the
name of Artaxerxes.
Alexander now halted at Hekatompylos,^ a place
which received this Greek name from its being the centre
where many roads met, and which became in after times
the capital of the Parthian kings. Being joined here by
the rest of his army, he prepared to invade Hyrkania, from
which he was separated by the chain of mountains now
called the Elburz. As the passes were beset by robber-
tribes, he divided his army into three bodies. The most
numerous division crossed the mountains under his own
command by the shortest and most difficult roads.
Krateros made a circuit to the left through the country
of the Tapeirians (Taburistan), while the third division
^ Perhaps Damaghan, but its posi-
tion is very uncertain. According to
Apollodoros it was 1260 stadia be-
yond the Kaspian Gates, but accord-
ing to Pliny only 133 miles. Sec
Curzon's Persia^ i. p. 287.
\
/
36
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
37
under Erigyios took the royal road which led westward
from Hekatompylos to Zadrakarta.^ The divisions on
emerging from the defiles united, and encamped near
the last named place, which was the Hyrkanian capital.
Hither came to Alexander with three of his sons the
aged Artabazos, accompanied by the Tapeirian satrap
and by deputies from the Greek mercenaries of Darius.
Artabazos was received with distinguished honour, both
because of his high rank and the fidelity he had shown
to Darius, whom he had accompanied in his flight. The
satrap was confirmed in his government, but the deputies
were sternly told that as the mercenaries had violated the
duty which they owed to their country, they must submit
themselves unreservedly to the judgment of the king.
Alexander then attacked the Mardians who inhabited the
lofty mountains to the north-west of the Kaspian Gates.
They submitted after a slight resistance, and were ordered
to obey the Tapeirian satrap.
Alexander's next object was to crush Bessos and
possess himself of all the eastern provinces as far as the
borders of India. He therefore marched eastward towards
Baktria, and having traversed the northern part of Parthia,
reached Sousia, a city of Areia (now Sous, near Meshed,
the present capital of Khorasan). Satibarzanes, the satrap
of that province, and one of the conspirators against
Darius, met him here, and having tendered his submission,
was confirmed in his government, and dismissed with an
escort of Macedonian horsemen to his capital, Artakoana.
Alexander then resumed his march towards Baktria, but
was arrested on the way by receiving word that Satibar-
zanes had revolted in favour of Bessos, armed the Areians,
and slain his Macedonian escort. He therefore at once
altered his route, and by the promptitude of his appear-
ance confounded the plans of the satrap, who fled and was
deserted by most of his troops. Artakoana was captured
by Krateros after a short siege. This city stood in a
plain of exceptional fertility at a point where all the roads
^ Sariy according to Droysen.
from the north to the south, and from the west to the
east, united, and Alexander, discerning the incomparable
advantages of its position, whether for war or commerce,
founded in its neighbourhood a new city in which he
planted a Macedonian colony. He called it Alexandreia,
and as it still exists as Herat, it will be seen how well
grounded was its founder's belief in the strategetical and
commercial importance of its site.
Alexander, after suppressing this revolt, instead of
resuming his march to Baktria, moved forward to Proph-
thasia (now Furrah), the capital of Drangiana (Seistan), of
which Barsaentes, another of the accomplices in the murder
of Darius, was satrap. This traitor was seized and exe-
cuted. Here an event occurred which has left a dark
stain on the character of Alexander. He was led to
suspect that a conspiracy had been formed against his life
by some of his principal officers, and among others by
the son of Parmenion, Philotas, who held the most coveted
post in the army, that of commander of the Companion
Cavalry. It is certain that he was not an accomplice in
the plot ; but as he had been informed of its existence,
and failed to give the king any warning of his danger, he
was accused before the Macedonian army and condemned
to death. He confessed under torture that his father,
Parmenion, had formed a design against the king's life, and
that he had himself joined the recent plot, lest his father,
who was now an old man, might, before the plot was ripe,
be snatched away by death from his command at Ekba-
tana, which placed the vast treasures deposited there at
his disposal. This confession, wrung by torture when its
agonies became insupportable, and obviously framed to
meet the wishes of the questioners, was no proof of the
guilt either of the father or the son. Parmenion was, never-
theless, on this worthless evidence condemned to death,
and Alexander, whom he had so faithfully served, took
care that the sentence should be executed before the news
of his son's death, which he might seek to avenge, could
reach his ears. Many other Macedonians were also at
X
INTRODUCTION
this time tried and put to death. Alexander's confidence
in his friends was thus much shaken ; and instead of
entrusting as formerly the command of the Companion
Cavalry to one individual, he divided that body into two
regiments, giving the command of one to Kleitos, and of
the other to Hephaistion.
From Prophthasia he proceeded southwards into the
fertile plains along the Etymander (R. Helmund), then
inhabited by a peaceful tribe called the Ariaspians, who
had received from Cyrus the title of Euergetai — that is,
benefactors, because they had assisted him at a time when
he had been reduced to great straits. Alexander spent
two months in their dominions, probably awaiting the
arrival of reinforcements from Ekbatana. During this
interval Demetrios, a member of the king's bodyguard,
was arrested on suspicion of his having been implicated
with Philotas in the recent plot, and his office was bestowed
on Ptolemy, the son of Lagos, for whom this promotion
opened the way to a royal destiny. Alexander before
resuming his march appointed a governor over the Euer-
getai, but rewarded their hospitality by augmenting their
territory and confirming them in the enjoyment of their
political privileges.
He left this country about mid-winter, and ascending
the valley of the Etymander penetrated into Arachosia, a
province which stretched eastward to the Indus. As he
advanced northward by Kandahar the snow lay deep on
the ground, and the soldiers suffered severely both from
hunger and cold. About this time he heard that the
Areians had again revolted at the instigation of Satibar-
zanes, who had entered their province at the head of 2000
horse, and he immediately sent a detachment under Eri-
gyios to quell the insurgents. Continuing meanwhile his
own advance, he arrived at the foot of the colossal
mountain-barrier, the chain of Paropanisos, which separates
Kabul from Baktria. Here in a commanding position,
near the village of Charikar, which stands in the rich and
beautiful valley of Koh-Daman, he founded yet another
INTRODUCTION
39
Alexandreia (called by way of distinction Alexandreia of
the Paropamisadai, or Alexandria apud Caucasum), and
planted it with Macedonian colonists. According to
Strabo he wintered in this neighbourhood, but Arrian leads
us to suppose that he departed as soon as he had founded
the city. He crossed the mountains, as some think, by
the Bamian Pass, the most western of the four routes
which give access from the Koh-Daman to the regions of
the Upper Oxus. It is likelier, however, that he ascended
by the more direct route along the course of the Panjshir
river. The army again suffered on the way from the
severity of the cold, and still more from the scarcity of
provisions. According to Aristoboulos nothing grew on
these hills but terebinth trees and the herb called silphium,
on which the flocks and herds of the mountaineers pastured.
This march, which terminated at Adrapsa, occupied fifteen
days.
The Macedonians had now reached a fertile country ;
but as Bessos had ordered it to be ravaged, they found a
wide barrier of desolation opposed to their further advance.
The barrier was interposed in vain. Alexander resolutely
pressed forward, and Bessos and his associates fled at his
approach, and, crossing the Oxus, retired into Sogdiana.
Aornos and Baktra, the two principal cities of the Baktrian
satrapy, surrendered without resistance, and the satrapy
itself was soon afterwards reduced. At Baktra Erigyios,
who had succeeded in quelling the Areian revolt, rejoined
the army. Alexander having appointed Artabazos satrap
of his new conquest, inarched to the Oxus in pursuit of
Bessos, and came upon that river at the point where KijiL
now stands. There it was about three-quarters of a mile
in breadth, and the current was found to be both deep
and rapid. The passage, which occupied five days, was
made on floats, supported by skins stuffed with straw, and
rendered watertight. The army had no sooner gained
the right bank than messengers arrived from two of the
leading adherents of Bessos — Spitamenes, the satrap
of Sogdiana, and Dataphernes — promising to surrender
40
INTRODUCTION
Bessos, who was already their prisoner, if Alexander
would send a small force to their support. The king
assented, and sent Ptolemy forward to receive the traitor
from their hands. They gave him up, and he was
conducted with a rope round his neck into the presence
of the king, who ordered him to be scourged and then
conveyed to Zariaspa (which some identify with Baktra)
there to await his final doom. '
The army next marched forward to Marakanda, now
Samarkand, then merely the capital of the Sogdian
satrapy, but destined to be in aftertimes the capital
of the vast empire founded by Timour. It stood in the
valley of the Polytimetos (R. Kohik), a region of such
exuberant fertility and beauty that it figures in Persian
poetry as one of the four paradises of the world. Alex-
ander remained for some time in this pleasant neighbour-
hood to remount his cavalry and otherwise recruit his
forces. He then advanced to the river Jaxartes, which
formed the boundary between the Persian empire and
the barbarous Skythian tribes, and which the Greeks
confounded with the Tanais or Don. The country was
protected against the inroads of these warlike tribes by a
hne of fortified towns, of which the largest and strongest
Cyropolis, had been founded, as its name imports by
Cyrus. Alexander captured all these fortresses 'and
manned them with small Macedonian garrisons ; and to
curb the Skythians still more effectually, founded on the
banks of the Jaxartes, near where Khojent now stands
still another Alexandria, which the Greeks for distinction's
sake called Eschate, or " the Extreme." In the midst of
this undertaking, he was interrupted by the sudden out-
break of a widespread rebellion instigated by Spitamenes
and his confederates. Taking immediate and energetic
steps for its suppression, he in a few days recovered the
seven towns; and then crossing the Jaxartes, defeated the
bkythians, who with a view to aid the insurgents had mus-
tered in great force on its right bank. After this victory
he received tidings of the first serious disaster that had
INTRODUCTION
41
befallen his arms. He had sent a large force to operate
against Spitamenes, who was at the time besieging the
Macedonian garrison which held Marakanda. On learning
that this force was approaching, the rebel chief retired
down the Polytimetos to Bokhara, and thence to the vast
desert which stretches from Sogd to the Sea of Aral.
Here he was joined by a large body of Skythian horse-
men, and thus reinforced turned upon his pursuers, drove
them back from the edge of the desert, which they had
just entered, into the valley whence they had emerged,
and there, amid the woody ravines of the Polytimetos, cut
them to pieces almost to a man. Encouraged by this
success, he returned to Marakanda and renewed the siege
of its citadel, but on learning that Alexander was rapidly
returning from the Jaxartes, he retraced his steps towards
the desert, and reached it before the enemy overtook him.
The course of the pursuit led Alexander to the scene of
the late disaster. His first care was to bury the slain,
and he then avenged their death by ravaging with fire
and sword, in all its length and breadth, the lovely valley
of the Polytimetos. He showed no mercy, but slaughtered
all who fell into his hands, soldier and citizen alike. This
is certainly, as Thirlwall remarks, one of the acts of his
life for which it is most difficult to find an excuse.
As the year (329 B.C.) was now drawing to a close, he
recrossed the Oxus and returned to Zariaspa (Baktra?),
where he spent the winter. Sentence was here pro-
nounced upon Bessos, who was mutilated and then sent
to Ekbatana for execution. Alexander's European forces,
as the narrative has shown, were constantly undergoing
diminution, not only by losses in the field, but also by his
leaving Macedonian veterans to garrison important strong-
holds, or to form the nucleus of the population of the
cities he founded. He therefore from time to time sent
requisitions for recruits to Macedonia and Greece, and as
these were adequately met the fighting quality of his
troops was always maintained at the same high level.
During his stay at Baktra a great number of such recruits
\
42
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
43
arrived, and filled up the large gap which the late disaster
had made in his ranks. There came thither also ambas-
sadors from the King of the Skythians, bringing presents
and the offer of a marriage alliance, which was declined.
The King of the Khorasmians, moreover, whose dominions,
according to his own account, bordered on the land of the
Kolchians and the Amazons, came in person and offered
his services to Alexander should he wish to subdue the
nations to the north and west of the Kaspian Sea.
Alexander, however, being now anxious to enter India,
declined his offers for the present.
The accounts of his next two campaigns are con-
fused, and not always mutually consistent. According to
Curtius, when he moved from Zariaspa, he crossed the
river Ochos (now the Aksou), and came to a city called
Marginia, probably the Marginan of our times. Arrian,
however, makes no mention of this expedition. The
Baktrians were still imperfectly subjugated, and the
Sogdians, notwithstanding the severe chastisement they
had received, were again up in arms against his authority.
He therefore left Krateros to deal with the former, while
he marched in person against Marakanda. On his way
thither he performed another of his marvellous achieve-
ments, the capture of a fortress perched on the summit of
a steep, lofty, and strongly fortified rock, held by a power-
ful garrison, and deemed to be impregnable. He captured
it, nevertheless. Within this stronghold Oxyartes, a
Baktrian chief, had for safety deposited his wife and
daughters. Roxana, the eldest daughter, was, next to
the wife of Darius, the most beautiful of all Asiatic
women, and Alexander was so captivated with her charms
that he did not hesitate to make her his wife.
Spitamenes, meanwhile, assisted by the Massagetai,
one of the Skythian tribes that ranged over the Khoras-
mian desert, made a devastating irruption into Baktria,
and though he was in the end repulsed by Krateros,
escaped into the desert beyond the reach of pursuit!
Fearing he might renew his attack in some other quarter,
Alexander hastened to Marakanda to settle the province
and provide for its security against future hostile incur-
sions. To this end he directed a number of new towns
to be founded and planted with Macedonian, Greek, and
native colonists. In the course of this expedition he
came to the Royal Park at Bazaria (perhaps Bokhara),
and while hunting within its precincts killed a lion of
extraordinary size with his own hand.
On his return to Marakanda a tragic incident occurred
— his murder of Kleitos, from whom he had received
some provocation in the course of a drunken revel. As
he was tenderly attached to Kleitos, who was the brother
of his nurse, and had saved his life at the Granikos, his
remorse for this frenzied deed knew no bounds at the
time, and gave him many bitter moments in his after life.
His next expedition led him towards the western
frontier of the province, where he reduced the district
called Xenippa, which lay on the skirts of the Noura
mountains — a range that runs from east to west about
ten miles north of Bokhara. As Spitamenes was sup-
posed to be in the desert not far off, he left Koinos in
that part of the country with orders to capture that
audacious rebel, while he himself withdrew to Nautaka,
where he intended to pass the winter. This place was
situated in a fertile oasis between Samarkand and the
Oxus, and must have occupied the site of Kurshee or
Kesh, noted afterwards as the birthplace of Timour.
Spitamenes, meanwhile, attacked Koinos, but was de-
feated after a severe struggle, and driven back into the
desert. His Skythian confedei ates, fearing their own
country might be invaded, cut off his head and sent it to
Alexander ; and so perished the most active, bold, and
persevering antagonist that he had as yet encountered in
Asia, one of the few who resolutely and to the last scorned
to bend his neck to a foreign yoke.
With the first return of spring (B.C. 327) he moved
from his winter quarters to invade the Paraitakai, who, as
their name indicates, inhabited a mountainous district, and
/
44
INTRODUCTION
were, some think, a branch of the widespread Takka tribe,
the name of which appears in Taxila, which designated a
great capital it possessed in India. In the country of the
Paraitakai, which lay to the east of Baktria and Sogdiana,
there was another great rock fortress, which, like the
Sogdian, was deemed impregnable. It was the main
stronghold of a chief called Khorienes, who, after holding
out for some time, was persuaded by Oxyartes to cast
himself on the generosity of the great conqueror, a quality
of which he had himself a very satisfactory experience.
Khorienes therefore surrendered, and was rewarded by
being confirmed in his government. Alexander after this
success proceeded to Baktra in order to make preparation
for his expedition into India, but left Krateros to reduce
such of the tribes as still held out for independence. At
Baktra another tragedy was enacted. The court pages, at
the instigation of one of their number, called Hermolaos,
who had been subjected to some degrading punishment,'
conspired against the king, who narrowly escaped assassi-
nation. The pages, who all belonged to families of high
rank, were tortured to extract confessions of their guilt,
and were then stoned to death by the Macedonians. The
confessions indicated, it is said, that Kallisthenes, a literary
man attached to the court who had been permitted, on the
recommendation of his kinsman Aristotle, to accompany
the expedition, not only knew of the existence of the
plot, but had encouraged the pages to persist in their
design. He had rendered himself obnoxious to the king
by the freedom with which he expressed his opinions and
by his opposition to the Persian fashions introduced into
the court, and his doom was sealed. Accounts differ as
to the time and mode of his death. According to Ptolemy
he was tortured and then crucified, but Aristoboulos and
Chares agree in stating that he was carried about in chains
and died at last of disease in India.
The summer had set in when Alexander set out from
Baktra on his Indian expedition. He crossed the chain
of Paropamisos in ten days, and halted at the Alexandreia
INTRODUCTION
45
which he had founded at their base to settle the affairs of
that city and the surrounding district. The narrative of
his campaigns, from the time he left this place till he led
his army into Karmania, after its disastrous march through
the burning sands of the Gedrosian desert, is given in full
detail in the translations which form the body of this
work. His march, which on his emerging from the desert
lay through the beautiful and fertile province of Karmania,
resembled a festive procession, and the licence in which
he permitted his soldiers to indulge was meant no less to
obliterate the memory of their terrible sufferings in the
desert than to celebrate according to Bacchic fashion and
example the conquest of India.
In Karmania, Alexander received intelligence that
Philip, who had been left in command of all the country
west of the Indus had been slain in a mutiny by the Greek
mercenaries under his command, but that the Macedonian
troops had quelled the mutiny and put the assassins to
death. He did not at the time appoint any successor to
Philip, but empowered Eudemos and Taxiles to take
temporary charge of the affairs of the satrapy. Before
he left Karmania he was rejoined by Krateros who brought
in safety the division of the army which he had led from
the Indus by way of Arachosia, Drangiana, and the
Karmanian desert. Nearchos also visited his camp, which
at the time was a five days' journey distant from the sea,
and communicated the welcome news that the fleet had
arrived in safety at the mouth of the Persian Gulf The
admiral was instructed to continue the voyage by sailing
up the Gulf to the mouth of the Tigris, while Hephaistion
was put in command of the main army with orHers to
proceed to Sousa along the maritime parts of Persis and
Sousiana. The king himself with a small division took
the upper road which led to that capital through Pasar-
gadai and Persepolis. In Persis things had not gone well
in his absence. The satrap whom he had appointed was
dead, and his office had been usurped by Orxines, a Persian
of great wealth and high rank, against whom many acts of
46
INTRODUCTION
violence and oppression were charged. He found also
that the tomb of Cyrus had been desecrated and plundered,
and this outrage excited his violent indignation, since he
looked upon that conqueror as the founder of the vast
empire which was now his own. He could not discover
the perpetrators, but had to content himself with ordering
the violated sepulchre to be properly restored. On reaching
Persepolis he investigated the charges against Orxines,
and finding them proved, put him to death, and gave his
satrapy to Peukestas, one of the commanders of his
bodyguard.
In Persis the health of Kalanos, the Indian gymno-
sophist, who, at Alexander's request, had abjured the
ascetic life and followed him from India, began to fail,
and, as he chose rather to die than suffer the infirmities
of age, he announced that it was his intention to burn him-
self The king attempted to dissuade him, but finding
that he was inexorably bent on self-destruction, ordered a
funeral pyre to be prepared for him, and all the arrange-
ments connected with his cremation to be superintended
by Ptolemy. On the day appointed the devotee ascended
the pyre and perished in its flames, exhibiting throughout
a serene fortitude and self-possession which greatly
astonished the Macedonians who attended in throngs to
witness this strange spectacle. Strabo makes Pasargadai
to be the scene of this incident, but Diodoros, Sousa, and
with more probability, since we know that Nearchos was
an eye-witness of the burning.
Alexander reached Sousa in the beginning of the year
324 B.C., and remained there for a considerable time,
regulating the affairs of his new dominions. One of his
great objects was to fuse together as far as was practicable
his European with his Asiatic subjects ; and to this end
he assigned to some eighty of his generals Asiatic wives,
givmg with each an ample dowry. He took himself a
second wife. Barsine, called sometimes Stateira, the eldest
daughter of Darius, and, it is said, also a third, Parysatis,
the daughter of Ochos, one of the predecessors of Darius!
/
INTRODUCTION
47
About 10,000 Macedonians followed the example of their
suj)eriors, and all who did so received presents from their
royal master. Carrying out this object in another form,
he enrolled a large number of Asiatics among his European
troops. These new schemes were so bitterly resented by
tke better class of his Macedonian veterans that they rose
against him in a mutiny which he had no little difficulty
in quelling. About 10,000 of these veterans were dis-
missed, and they returned to Europe under the command
of Krateros. Towards the close of the year he went to
Ekbatana, and there he lost his chief favourite Hephaistion,
who succumbed to an attack of fever. His grief at this
bereavement knew no bounds, and showed itself in acts
which seem copied from those wherewith Achilles demon-
strated his passionate sense of the loss of his beloved
Patroklos. From Ekbatana he marched back towards
Babylon, and was met on the way by ambassadors from
all parts of the known world, who came to do homage to
the greatest of all kings and conquerors, and also by a
deputation of Chaldaean priests who warned him of danger
if at that time he should enter Babylon. He entered it
nevertheless, though with gloomy forebodings, early in the
spring of 323 B.C. As this city was the best point of
communication between the eastern and western parts of
his dominions, he had selected it to be the capital of his
vast empire, and accordingly took measures immediately
on his return for the improvement of its internal condition,
for the drainage of the swampy lands in its neighbour-
hood which rendered its climate unhealthy, and also for
removing obstacles to the safe and easy navigation of the
great river by which it communicated with the sea.
His ambition being still, however, unsated, he meditated
fresh conquests, which, if effected, would have made him
master of the world from the shores of the Atlantic to
the Eastern Ocean. But his end was now drawing near.
The climate of Babylon was malarious, and as his spirits
were depressed both by his loss of Hephaistion and
by superstitious fears, he was less able to withstand its
>i^
48
INTRODUCTION
malignant influences. He caught a fever, and having
aggravated its virulence by indulging in convivial excesses,
was cut off in June 323 B.C. at the age of thirty-thn^e,'
and after he had reigned for nearly thirteen years.
"So passed from the earth," says Bishop Thirlwall, "one
of the greatest of her sons : great above most for wb-.t
he was in himself, and not, as many who have borne the
title, for what was given him to effect. Great, not merely
in the vast compass and the persevering ardour of his
ambition ... but in the course which his ambition
took, in the collateral aims which ennobled and purified
it, so that it almost grew into one with the highest of
which man is capable, the desire of knowledge and the
love of good. In a word, great as one of the benefactors
of his kind. ... It may be truly asserted that his was
the first of the great monarchies founded in Asia that
opened a prospect of progressive improvement, and not
of continual degradation, to its subjects : it was the first
that contained any element of moral and intellectual
progress." This estimate, high as it is, appears to be just
and sober, and to hold a due balance between the ex-
travagant eulogiums and the damnatory criticisms of other
writers such as Mitford, Williams, and Droysen on the
one hand, and Niebuhr, Sainte-Croix, and Grote on the
other, who all alike allowed their ethical and political
proclivities to bias their judgment.
Alexander was dignified both in
his appearance and in his demeanour.
He was not above the ordinary height,
but his frame was well built and ex-
tremely muscular. "He was very
handsome in person," says Arrian,
"devoted to exertion, of an active
mind and a most heroic courage, tena-
cious of honour, ever ready to meet
dangers, indifferent to the pleasures
of the body, and strictly observant of his religious
duties." Plutarch tells us that the statues of Alexander
Fig. 4. — Alexander
THE Great.
INTRODUCTION
49
which most resembled him were those of Lysippos,
who alone had his permission to represent him in
marble, and who best hit off the turn of his head,
which leaned a little to one side.^ He adds that he was
of a fair complexion, with a tinge of red in his face and
upon his breast, and that his breath and whole person
were so fragrant that they perfumed his under garments.
In another passage, describing Alexander's habits, the
same author says that he was very temperate in eating,
and that he was not so much addicted to wine as he
was thought to be. What gave rise to this opinion was
his practice of spending a great deal of time at table.
The time, however, was passed rather in talking than
drinking, every cup introducing some long discussion.
Besides, he never sat long at table except when he had
abundance of leisure. There was always a magnificence
at his table, and the expense rose with his fortune till
it came to the fixed sum of 10,000 drachms for each
entertainment. As in his dying moments he had given
orders that his body should be conveyed to Ammon in
the Libyan oasis, it was embalmed, and after more than
two years had been spent in making preparations for its
removal, it was conveyed with vast pomp in a car of
wondrous magnificence to Egypt, where it was entombed
first at Memphis, and afterwards, by the authority of
Ptolemy,^ at Alexandreia, the greatest of all the cities
which he had founded and called after his name.
Alexander was so prematurely cut off, and was besides
so much occupied before his death with organising fresh
expeditions, both maritime and military, that he had no
time to improve or complete the measures which he had
initiated for promoting the fusion and securing the per-
manent unification of the multifarious races comprised
in his empire. Had he been vouchsafed a longer term
of life, it seems probable that he would have succeeded
^ " Edicto vetuit ne quis se praeter 2 Pausanias, however, says that it
Apellem Pingeret, aut alius Lysippo was Philadelphos who brought the
duceret aera Fortis Alexandri vultum body to Alexandreia.
simulantia. " — Horace.
E
Jo
INTRODUCTION
in welding so firmly together all the parts of his dominions
that centuries might have elapsed before they became
again disintegrated ; but the dissensions which speedily
broke out between his great captains, originating in their
ambition to rule with independent authority, shattered
his empire and embroiled it in wars which lasted for
nearly half a century.
Soon after his death Perdikkas, to whom in his last
moments he had given his signet-ring, was appointed to
conduct the government on behalf of the royal family,
which was held to consist of Arrhidaios, the king's half-
brother, a man of weak intellect and character, and Queen
Roxana, who a few months after her husband's death
gave birth to a son who received the name of Alexander
Aigos. The satrapies were then divided among the lead-
ing generals. Perdikkas soon began to use his position
for the furtherance of his own selfish designs, and having
secured the support of Eumenes, attempted to crush his
colleagues and assume all power to himself He marched
first into Egypt against Ptolemy, but on the banks of
the Nile he was defeated and slain in a mutiny of his
own men 321 B.C. Tidings soon afterwards reached the
army that Krateros had been defeated and slain in fight-
ing against Eumenes while marching to assist Ptolemy.
The ofBce of regent was upon this offered to Ptolemy,
who declined its acceptance, as he held that the satrapies
should become independent kingdoms. The army then
conferred that office, along with the tutelage of the royal
family, on Antipater of Macedonia, who had crossed over
into Asia to oppose Perdikkas. A new partition of the
provinces, which did not differ much from the former,
was then made at a place in Upper Syria called Tripara-
deisos. Under this arrangement Ptolemy held Egypt ;
Lysimachos, Thrace ; Antigonos, Phrygia or Central Asia
Minor ; Seleukos, Babylon ; Antigenes, Sousiana ; Peu-
kestas, Persia; Peithon, son of Krateros, Media; Nearchos,
Pamphylia and Lycia; Arrhidaios, Hellespontine Phrygia;
Antipater and Polysperchon, Macedonia and Greece.
INTRODUCTION
51
Eumenes still held the satrapy at first assigned to him — that
of Kappadokia, Paphlagonia, and Pontos — and was now the
feader of those who had been the adherents of Perdikkas.
He was supported by Alketas, the brother of Perdikkas,
Peukestas, Attalos, Antigenes, and by the influence of
Olympias, the mother of Alexander. Besides Perdikkas
and Krateros, two other great generals had by this time
disappeared from the scene — Meleager, who had been cut
off by Perdikkas, and Leonnatos, who had been slain in
the Lamian war.
Antigonos was appointed by Antipater to conduct the
war against Eumenes, and after many fluctuations of
fortune at last captured him and put him to death.
This happened early in the year 3 1 6 B.C. The fortunes
of Alexander's empire were then left at the disposal of
five men — Antigonos, Lysimachos, Ptolemy, Seleukos,
and Kassander, the son of Antipater, who had died in
the year 319 B.C. The ambition and ever -increasing
power of Antigonos soon led his colleagues to form a
coalition against him, and a long series of hostilities
followed. In the end Antigonos and his son Demetrios,
surnamed Poliorketes, were defeated by the confederates
in the battle of Ipsos in 301 B.C. Antigonos fell on the
field of battle, and the greater part of his dominions fell
to the share of Seleukos, whose cavalry and elephants had
been chiefly instrumental in winning the victory. He
received as his reward a great part of Asia Minor as well
as the whole of Syria from the Euphrates to the Mediter-
ranean. Ptolemy obtained Phoenicia and Hollow Syria,
but these provinces afterwards gave rise to frequent wars
between succeeding kings of Egypt and Syria. A war
in later times broke out between Seleukos and Lysimachos,
in which the latter was slain in 281 B.C. His kingdom
of Thrace was afterwards merged in that of Macedonia.
Thus the empire of Alexander, after a period of incessant
wars continued for upwards of forty years, was divided
between the powerful monarchs of Macedonia, Egypt,
and Syria.
52
INTRODUCTION
The successors of Seleukos were unable to retain hold
of their remote eastern dependencies. About the middle
of the third century B.C. Theodotos or Diodotos, the
\
^^
Fig. 5. — Diodotos.
governor of Baktra, revolted from his grandson Antiochos
II. and made Baktra an independent kingom. Not long
afterwards As'oka, the grandson of Chandragupta, as we
learn from one of his own inscriptions,^ sent missionaries
to the kings of the West to proclaim to them and to their
subjects the doctrines of Buddhism. The kings named
in the inscription are Antiyoka (Antiochos II., king of
Syria), Turamaya (Ptolemy III, Euergetes, king of Egypt),
Antigona (Antigonas Gonatas, king of Macedonia), Maga
(Magas, king of Kyrene). About the year 212 B.C.
Antiochos III., surnamed the Great, marched eastward to
V-
\
-.. A^,
Fig. 6.— Antiochos the Great.
recover Parthia and Baktria which had both revolted from
the second Antiochos. He was, however, unable, even after
a war which lasted for some years, to effect the subju-
gation of these kingdoms, and accordingly concluded a
treaty with them in which he recognised their independence.
^ See Note L/ in Appendix.
INTRODUCTION
53
With the assistance of the Baktrian sovereign Euthydemos,
who founded the greatness of the Baktrian monarchy, he
made an expedition into India, where he renewed the
alliance with that country which had been formed in the
Fig. 7. — Euthydemos.
days of Sandrokottos. From Sophagasenos,^ the chief of
the Indian kings, he obtained a large supply of elephants,
and then returned to Syria by the route through Arachosia
in the year 205 B.C.
^ This name, transliterates the a personal name but an official title.
Sanskrit Subhagasena, which was not See Lassen, hid. Alt. II. p. 273.
ARRIAN'S ANABASIS
Fourth Book
Chapter XXII, — Alexajider crosses the Indian Kaukasos to
invade India and advances to the river Kophen
After capturing the Rock of Chorienes, Alexander
went himself to Baktra, but .despatched Krateros with
600 of the Companion Cavalry ^ and a force of infantry,
consisting of his own brigade with that of Polysperchon
and Attalos and that of Alketas, against Katanes and
Austanes the only chiefs now left in the country of the
Paraitakenai ^ who still held out against him. In the
battle which ensued Krateros after a severe struggle proved
victorious. Katanes fell in the action, while Austanes
was made prisoner and brought to Alexander. Of the
barbarians who had followed them to the field, there were
slain 120 horsemen and about 1500 foot. Krateros after
^ The Companion Cavalry, called
sometimes simply the Companions,
were the Royal Horse Guards, a body
which at the beginning of the campaign
consisted of 1500 men, all scions of
the noblest families of Macedonia and
Thessaly. In the course of the war
their numbers were augmented per-
haps to 5000, as Miitzell conjectures.
2 The Parai-tak-enai possessed part
of the mountainous country between
the upper courses of the Oxus and the
Jaxartes. They were perhaps one in
race with the Takkas of India, who
had a great and flourishing capital,
Taxila {i.e. Takkasila, the Rock of
the Takkas), situated between the
Indus and Upper Hydaspes. The
first part of their name Par at repre-
sents perhaps the Sanskrit parvata, a
hill, or pahdr (a hill) of the common
dialect. A tribe of the same name
occupied a mountainous part of Media
(Herod, i. loi), and another is located
by Isidoros of Charax between Dran-
giana and Arachosia. Another form
of the name is Paraitakai (Arrian, iii.
19 ; Strabo, xvi. 736 ; Stephanos
Byz.)
S8
THE INVASION OF INDIA
V.^
the victory led his troops also to Baktra. While Alex-
ander was here the tragic incident in his history, the
affair of Kallisthenes and the pages, occurred.
When spring was now past,^ he led his army from
Baktra to invade the Indians, leaving Amyntas in the land
f the Baktrians with 3500 horse and 10,000 foot. In
ten days he crossed the Kaukasos ^ and arrived at the city
of Alexandreia ^ which he had founded in the land of the
Parapamisadai ^ when he first marched to Baktra. The
ruler whom he had then set over the city he dismissed
from his office because he thought he had not discharged
its duties well. He recruited the population of Alex-
andreia with fresh settlers from the surrounding district,
and also with such of his soldiers as were unfit for further
service."^ He then ordered Nikanor, one of the Companions,
to take charge of the city itself and regulate its affairs,
but he appointed Tyriaspes satrap of the land of the
^ The spring of 327 B.C.
- Kaukasos here denotes the lofty
mountain range, now called the
Central Hindu Kush, which forms
the northern frontier of Kabul. Its
native designation was Parapamisos,
or, as Ptolemy more correctly trans-
literates it, Paropanisos. Till Alex-
ander's time these mountains were
altogether unknown to the Greeks.
The officers of his army who wrote
accounts of his Asiatic expedition
sometimes considered them to be a
continuation of the Tauros, and some-
times of the Kaukasos. Arrian, who
regarded them as an extension of the
former range, says that the Mace-
donian soldiers called them Kaukasos
to flatter Alexander, as if, when he
had crossed them to enter Baktria, he
had carried his victorious arms beyond
Kaukasos. The Greeks of those days,
it must be observed, had no definite
knowledge of the mountains to which
that name was properly applicable,
but vaguely conceived them to be the
loftiest and the remotest to be found
in the eastern parts of the world. The
pass by which Alexander recrossed
the Paropanisos was most probably
the Kushan or Gborbund Pass.
^ See Note' A, Alexandreia under
Kaukasos.
■* The tribes collectively designated
Parapamisadai were, according to
Ptolemy (who calls them Paropan-
isadai), the five following : — The
Bolitai, Aristophyloi, Parsioi, Pars-
yetai, and Ambautai. They lived
along the spurs of the Hindu Kush,
chiefly along its southern and eastern
sides. They thus occupied the whole
of Kabulistan, and part of Afghanistan.
The Bolitai were probably the people
of Kabul, a city which, no doubt,
represents that which Ptolemy calls
Karoura (Kaboura?) or Ortospana.
^ The colonies which Alexander
planted in the countries he overran
were of a military character, designed
to secure the permanence, cohesion,
and ultimate unification of his con-
quests. The war-worn soldiers whom
he made colonists were condemned to
perpetual exile, as may be gathered
from the fate which overtook the
colonists who of their own accord left
Baktra and attempted to return to
Greece. They were treated as de-
serters, and were all put to death.
y r
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
59
Parapamisadai and the rest of the country as far as the
river Kophen.^ Having reached the city of Nikaia - and
sacrificed to the goddess Athena, he despatched a herald
to Taxiles ^ and the chiefs on this side of the river Indus,
directing them to meet him where it was most convenient
for each. Taxiles accordingly and the other chiefs did
meet him and brought him such presents as are most
esteemed by the Indians. They offered also to give him
the elephants which they had with them amounting in
number to five-and-twenty.
Having here divided his army, he despatched Hephais-
tion and Perdikkas with the brigades of Gorgias, Kleitos,"^
and Meleager, half of the companion cavalry, and the
whole of the mercenary cavalry, to the land of Peukelaotis ^
and the river Indus.^ He ordered them either to seize
by force whatever places lay on their route or to accept
their submission if they capitulated, and when they came
to the Indus to make whatever preparations were neces-
sary for the transport of the army across that river.
capital of Gandhara was known.
General Cunningham has fixed its
position at the two large towns of
Parang and Charsada, which form part
of Hashtnagar, or eight cities^ that are
seated close together on the eastern
bank of the L ajida i or lower Swat
river. The position thus indicated is
nearly seventeen miles to the north-
west of Peshawar. The city was in
early times a great emporium of com-
merce. Ptolemy, who with the author
of the Periplus of the Erythraian sea,
calls it Proklais, has correctly located
it on the eastern bank of the river of
Souastene, i.e. the river of Swat.
Wilson, however, and Abbott take
Pekhely (or Pakholi) in the neigh-
bourhood of Peshawar to be the
modern representative of the old
Gandharian capital {v. Cunningham's
Anc. Geog. of India^ pp. 49-51).
^ The route assigned to this division
lay along the course of the Kabul
river and through the Khaiber Pass to
Peukelaotis, which was situated where,
or near where, Hasht-nagar on the
river Landai now stands.
1 This is the Kabul river, called
otherwise by the classical writers the
Kdphes^ except by Ptolemy, who calls
it the K6a. Its name in Sanskrit is
the KubM.
2 See Note B.
3 Taxiles. His distinctive name,
as we learn from Curtius (viii. 14), was
Omphis. Diodoros (xvii. 86) less
accurately calls him Mophis, and says
that Alexander changed his name to
Taxiles. This is, however, a mistake,
for Taxiles was a territorial title which
each sovereign of Taxila assumed on
his accession to power. Indian princes
are generally designated in the classics
by their territorial or dynastic titles.
The father of Omphis died about the
time Alexander was making his pre-
parations to invade India.
* Kleitos had been killed before
the army left Baktra, but his brigade
continued to bear his name even after
his death.
^ Peukelaotis designated both a dis-
trict and its capital city. The name is
a transliteration of Pukkalaoti, which
is the Pali form of the Sanskrit Push-
kalavatijthe name by which the ancient
6o
THE INVASION OF INDIA
They were accompanied on their march by Taxiles and
the other chiefs. On reaching the river Indus they began
to carry out the instructions which they had received
from Alexander. One of the chiefs, however, Astes, a
prince of the land of Peukelaotis, revolted, but perished
in the attempt, besides involving in ruin the city to which
he had fled for refuge, which the troops under Hephaistion
captured in thirty days. Astes himself fell, and Sang-
gaios,^ who had some time before fled from Astes and'
deserted to Taxiles, a circumstance which guaranteed his
fidelity to Alexander, was appointed governor of the
city.
Chapter XXIII. — Alexander wars against the Aspasians
Alexander took command in person of the other
division of the army, consisting of the hypaspists,^ all
the companion cavalry except what was with Hephaistion,
the brigades of infantry called the foot-companions, the
archers, the Agrianians, and the horse lancers, *and
advanced into the country of the Aspasians and Gour-
aians and Assakenians.^ The route which he followed^
^ This name is perhaps a trans-
literation of the Sanskrit Sanjaya,
which means victor. A Shinwari
tribe called Sangu is found inhabiting
a part of the Nangrihar district west
of the Khaiber Pass.
^ The hypaspists, so called because
they carried the round shield called
aspis, while the hoplites carried the
oblong shield called hoplon, formed a
body of about 3000 men at the outset
of the war, but were perhaps aug-
mented to double that number during
its progress. They were not so
heavily armed as the hoplites, and
were therefore more rapid in their
movements. The foot companions
were another distinguished corps of
guards. The Agrianians, who made
excellent light-armed troops, were a
Paionian people whose country ad-
joined the sources of the river Strymon.
^ Aspasioi and Assakenoi. See
Note C.
\ Strabo (xv. 697) states the reasons
which led Alexander to select the
northern route to the Indus in prefer-
ence to the southern. "Alexander
was informed," he says, "that the
mountainous and northern parts were
the most habitable and fertile, but
that the southern part was either
without water or liable to be over-
flowed by rivers at one time, or entirely
burnt up at another, more fit to be the
haunts of wild beasts than the dwell-
ings of men. He resolved therefore
to master first that part of India which
had been well spoken of, considering
at the same time that the rivers
which it was necessary to pass, and
which flowed transversely through the
country which he proposed to attack,
would be crossed with more facility
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
61
was hilly and rugged, and lay along the course of the
river called the Khoes,^ which he had difficulty in cross-
ing. This done "he^ ordered the mass of the infantry to
follow leisurely, while he rode rapidly forward, taking
with him the whole of his cavalry, besides 800 Mace-
donian foot soldiers, whom he mounted on horseback
with their infantry shields ; for he had been informed
that the barbarians inhabiting those parts had fled for
refuee to their native mountains, and to such of their
cities as were strongly fortified. When he proceeded to
attack the first city of this kind that came in his way, he
found men drawn up before it in battle order, and on
these he fell at once, just as he was, put them to rout,
and shut them up within the gates. He was wounded,
however, in the shoulder by a dart which penetrated
through his breast-plate, but not severely, for the breast-
plate prevented the weapon from going right through his
shoulder. Ptolemy, the son of Lagos, and Leonnatos were
also wounded.
He then encamped near the city on the side where he
thought the wall was weakest. Next day, as soon as
towards their sources." The districts
through which he passed are now
called Kafiristan, Chittral, Swat, and
the Yusufzai country. It is more
difficult to trace in this than in any
other of his campaigns the course of
his movements, and to identify with
certainty the various strongholds which
he attacked. The country through
which he passed is but little known
even at the present day, and, as Bun-
bury remarks, a glance at the labyrinth
of mountains and valleys, which occupy
the whole space in question in the
best modern maps, will sufficiently
show how utterly bewildering they
must have been to the officers of
Alexander, who neither used maps
nor the compass, and were incapable
of the simplest geographical observa-
tions. The time occupied by Alex-
ander in marching from the foot of
Kaukasos to the Indus was about a
year. Like Napoleon, he kept the
field even in winter, though in these
parts the cold at that season is intense.
1 Khoes. This is the first river
Alexander would reach after he had
left his encampment near the junction
of the Panjshir with the Kophen,
which appears to have been the place
where he divided his army. It cannot
have been, as Lassen thought, the
Kamah or Kunar, but is rather the
stream formed by the junction of the
Alishang and the Alinghar, which
joins the Kophen on the left in the
neighbourhood of Mandrour above
Jalalabad. The Alinghar river, as
we learn from Masson, is called also
the Kow. The Koa of Ptolemy
must not be confounded with the
Khoes of the text, for that author
in describing the Koa says that it
receives a tributary from the Paro-
panisadai, and that after being joined
by the Souastos (the river of Swat)
it falls into the Indus. The Koa is
therefore probably the Kophen after
its reception of the Kamah or Kunar
river.
62
THE INVASION OF INDIA
there was light, the Macedonians attacked the outer of
the two walls by which the city was encompassed, and as
it was but rudely constructed they captured it without
difficulty. At the inner wall, however, the barbarians
made some resistance ; but when the ladders were ap-
plied, and the defenders were galled with darts wherever
they turned, they no longer stood their ground, but
issued from the city through the gates and made for the
hills. Some of them perished in the flight, while such
as were taken alive were to a man put to death by the
Macedonians, who were enraged against them for having
wounded Alexander. Most of them, however, made good
their escape to the mountains, which lay at no great
distance from the city. Alexander Vazed it to the
ground, and then marched forward to another city called
Andaka, which surrendered on capitulation. When the
place had thus fallen into his hands he left Krateros in
these parts, with the other infantry officers, to take by
force whatever other cities refused voluntary submission,
and to settle the affairs of the surrounding district in the
best way existing circumstances would permit, while he
himself advanced to the river Euaspla,^ where the chief
of the Aspasians was.
Chapter XXIV. — Operations against the Aspasians
In this expedition Alexander took with him the
hypaspists, the archers, the Agrianians, the brigade of
Koinos and Attalos, the cavalry guard, about four squadrons
of the other companion cavalry, and one half of the
mounted archers. After a long march he reached, on
^ Euaspla R. This name, which, so
far as I know, occurs only in Arrian,
has not been satisfactorily explained.
It designated, no doubt, the river
which Aristotle, Strabo, and Curtius
call the Choaspes, and which the best
authorities identify with the Kamah
°5^ I^^inar, a river which rivals the
Kophen itself in the volume of its
waters and the length of its course.
It rises at the foot of the plateau of
Pamir, not far from the sources of the
Oxus, and joins the Kophen at some
distance below Jalalabad. Strabo
says that the Choaspes traverses
Bandobene (Badakshan) and Gand-
aritis after having passed near the
towns of Plegerion and Gory dale.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
63
the second day, the city of the Aspasian chief.^ The
barbarians on hearing of his approach set fire to their
city and fled to the mountains. But Alexander's men
followed close at the heels of the fugitives, as far as
the mountains, and made a great slaughter^ of the bar-
barians before they could escape to rough and difficult
ground.
During the pursuit Ptolemy, the son of Lagos, descried
the chief of the Indians of that country standing at the
time on a small eminence, with some of his shield-bearing
guards around him, and, although his own following was
much smaller, he nevertheless continued the chase, being
still on horseback. When the ascent, however, became
so difficult that his charger could no longer mount it at a
good pace, he left him there, and handing him over to
one of the hypaspists to lead, he proceeded on foot,
just as he was, to come up with the Indian. The latter
on seeing that Ptolemy was now near at hand, turned
round to face him, as did also his shield-bearing guards.
The Indian, closing with his adversary, struck him on the
breast with a long spear which pierced his cuirass, but
the cuirass broke all the force of the blow. Ptolemy, on
the other hand, smote the Indian right through the thigh,
laid him prone at his feet, and stripped him of his arms.
When his men saw their leader lying dead they left the
place, but the other Indians, when they saw on looking
from the mountains that the dead body of their chief was
being carried off by the enemy, were filled with grief and
rage, and rushing down to the small eminence fought for
the recovery of the corpse with the utmost determination ;
for by this time Alexander also was on the eminence, and
had brought with him the infantry soldiers, who had now
alighted from their horses. This reinforcement falling
upon the Indians succeeded after a hard struggle in
driving them ofl* to the mountains and securing the
possession of the dead body.
Alexander then crossed the mountains, and came to a
^ The capital of this chief was probably Gorys on the Choaspes.
64
THE INVASION OF INDIA
city at their base, named Arigaion.^ He found that the
inhabitants had burned the place and taken to flight.
Here Krateros, with his staff and the troops under his
command, rejoined him, after having fully carried out all the
orders given by the king. As the city seemed to occupy
a very advantageous site, he commanded Krateros to
fortify it strongly, and people it with as many natives of
the neighbourhood as should consent to make it their
home, together with any soldiers found unfit for further
service. He then marched to a place where, as he had
ascertained, most of the barbarians of that part of the
country had taken refuge, and on reaching a certain
mountain encamped at its base.
Meanwhile Ptolemy, the son of Lagos, who had been
sent out by Alexander to procure forage, and had gone
with a few followers a considerable distance in advaoce
to reconnoitre the enemy, came back to Alexander to
report that he had seen more fires where the barbarians
were posted than in Alexander's camp. Alexander, without
believing that the fires were so numerous, was still con-
vinced that a host of barbarians had mustered together
from the surrounding country, and therefore leaving a
part of his army where it was encamped in proximity to
the mountain, he took with .him such a force as the
reports led him to think would be adequate, and when
the fires were near in view, he divided it into three parts.
The command of one part he gave to Leonnatos, an
officer of the bodyguard, placing under him the brigade
of Attalos, along with that of Balakros. The command
of the second division he gave to Ptolemy, the son of
Lagos. It consisted of a third of the royal hypaspists,
/
^ Arigajoji. This place, which
was situated to the e^ _of .the
Choaspes, is perhaps now represented
by ITaogBl, a village in the province
of Bajore. Ritter identified it with
Bajore or Bagawar, the capital of this
province. The mountains to which
the inhabitants fled for refuge may
perhaps, as V. de Saint-Martin sug-
gests, be those which Justin (xii. 7)
calls Daedali, whereto he says Alex-
ander led his troops after the Bac-
chanalian revelry with which they had
been indulged at Nysa, There is no
mention elsewhere of Arigaion, unless
it be the "Argacum urbem " of the
Itiner. Alex. 105. It is taken by
Schneider to be the Acadira of
Curtius.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
65
together with the brigade of Philippos and Philotas, two
companies of archers, each a thousand strong, the Agri-
anians, and half of the horsemen. The third division
Alexander led in person against the position occupied by
the main body of the barbarians.
Chapter XXV. — Defeat of the Aspasians — The
Assakenians and Gouraians attacked
When they saw the Macedonians advancing against
them they came down from the high ground which they
had occupied into the plain below, confident in their
numbers, and despising the Macedonians for the small-
ness of theirs. A sharp conflict followed, but Alexander
without much trouble gained the victory. Ptolemy did
not draw up his men in line upon the plain, but since
the barbarians were posted on a small hill, he formed his
battalions into column, and led them up the hill on the
side where it was most assailable. He did not surround
the entire circuit of the hill, but left an opening for the
barbarians by which to escape if they meant flight.
With these men also the conflict was sharp, not only
from the difficult nature of the ground, but also because
the Indians were of a different mettle from the other
barbarians there, and were by far the stoutest warriors
in that neighbourhood ; but brave as they were they
were driven from the hill by the Macedonians. The
men of the third division under Leonnatos were equally
successful, as they also routed those with whom they
engaged. Ptolemy states that the men taken prisoners
were in all above 40,000, and that there were also cap-
tured more than 230,000 oxen, from which Alexander
chose out the best — those which he thought superior to
the others both for beauty and size — with a view to send
them to Macedonia to be employed in agriculture.
He marched thence to invade the country of the
Assakenians, for they were reported to have under arms
F
^Hll^W
THE INVASION OF INDIA
and ready for battle an army of 20,000 cavalry and
more than 30,000 infantry, besides 30 elephants.
Krateros had now completed the work of fortifying the
city which he had been left to plant with colonists, and
rejoined Alexander with the heavy armed troops and
the engines which it might be necessary to employ in
besieging towns. Alexander himself then proceeded to
attack the Assakenians, taking with him the companion
cavalry, the horse archers, the brigade of Koinos and
Polysperchon, and the thousand Agrianians and the
archers. He passed through the country of the Gour-
aians, where he had to cross the Gouraios,^ the river
named after that country. The passage was difficult
on account of the depth and swiftness of the stream,
and also because the stones at the bottom were so
smooth and round that the men on stepping on them
were apt to stumble. When the barbarians saw Alex-
ander approaching they had not the courage to encounter
him in the open field with their collective forces, but
dispersed to their several cities, which they resolved to
defend to the last extremity.
Chapter XXVL — Siege of Massaga
Alexander marched first to attack Massaga,^ which was
the greatest city in those parts. When he was now
approaching the walls, the barbarians, supported by a body
of Indian mercenaries brought from a distance, and no less
than 7000 strong, sallied out with a run against the
Macedonians when they observed them preparing to en-
camp. Alexander thus saw that the battle would be
^ The Gouraios is the river Paiij-
kora, which unites with the river of
Swit to form the Landai, a large
affluent of the Kabul river. It appears
under the name of the Gauri in the
sixth book of the Mahdbhdrata, where
it is mentioned along with the Suvastu
(the Swat river) and the Kampana.
It owes its name to the Ghori^ a great
and wide-spread tribe, branches of
which are still to be found on the
Parijkora, and also on both sides of
the Kabul River where it is joined by
the Landai. It formed the boundary
between the Gouraians and the Assa-
kenians.
* Mazaga. See Note D.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
67
fought close to the city, whereas he wished the enemy to
be drawn away to a distance from the walls, so that, if
they were defeated, as he was certain they would be, they
might have less chance of escaping with their lives by a
short flight into the city. Alexander therefore ordered
the Macedonians to fall back to a little hill which was
about seven stadia distant from the place where he had
meant to encamp. This gave the enemy fresh courage
as they thought the Macedonians had already given way
before them, and so they charged them at a running
pace and without any observance of order. But when
once their arrows began to reach his men, Alexander
immediately wheeled round at a signal agreed on and led
the phalanx at a running pace to fall upon them. But his
horse-lancers and the Agrianians and the archers darted
forward, and were the first to come into conflict with the
barbarians, while he was leading the phalanx in regular
order into action. The Indians were confounded by this
unexpected attack, and no sooner found themselves in-
volved in a hand-to-hand encounter than they gave way
and fled back to the city. About 200 of them were killed,
and the rest were shut up within the walls. Alexander
brought up the phalanx against the fortifications, but was
wounded in the ankle, though not severely, by an arrow
shot from the battlements. The next day he brought up
the military engines, and without much difficulty battered
down a part of the wall. But when the Macedonians
attempted to force their way through the breach which had
been made, the Indians repelled all their attacks with so
much spirit that Alexander was obliged for that day to draw
off his forces. On the morrow the Macedonians renewed
their assault with even greater vigour, and a wooden tower
was brought up against the wall from which the archers
shot at the Indians, while missiles were discharged against
them from engines. They were thus driven back to a
good distance, but still their assailants were after all unable
to force their way within the walls.
On the third day Alexander led the phalanx once more
6S
THE INVASION OF INDIA
to the assault, and causing a bridge to be thrown from an
engine over to that part of the wall which had been
battered down, by that gangway he led the hypaspists over
to the breach — the same men who by a similar expedient
had enabled him to capture Tyre. The bridge, however,
broke down under the great throng which was pushing
forward with eager haste, and the Macedonians fell with
it. The barbarians on the walls, seeing what had happened,
began amid loud cheering to ply the Macedonians with
stones and arrows and whatever missiles they had ready
at hand or could at the moment snatch up, while others
sallying out from posterns in the wall between the towers,
struck them at close quarters before they could extricate
themselves from the confusion caused by the accident.
Chapter XXVII. — Massaga taken by storm — Or a and
Bazira besieged
Alexander then sent Alketas with his brigade to take
up the wounded and recall to the camp the active com-
batants. On the fourth ,day another gangway on a
different engine was despatched by him against the wall.
Now the Indians, as long as the chief of that place was
still living, continued with great vigour to maintain the
defence, but when he was struck by a missile from an
engine and was killed by the blow, while some of them-
selves had fallen in the uninterrupted siege, and most of
them were wounded and disabled for fighting, they sent
a herald to treat with Alexander. To him it was
always a pleasure to save the lives of brave men, and he
came to an agreement with the Indian mercenaries to
the effect that they should change their side and take
service in his ranks. Upon this they left the city, arms
in hand, and encamped by themselves on a small hill
which faced the camp of the Macedonians. But as they
had no wish to take up arms against their own countrymen,
they resolved to arise by night and make off with all
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
69
fy
speed to their homes. When Alexander was informed of
this he surrounded the hill that same night with all his
troops, and having thus intercepted the Indians in the
midst of their flight, cut them to pieces. The city now
stripped of its defenders he took by storm, and captured
the mother and daughter of Assakenos.^ Alexander lost
in the siege from first to last five-and-twenty of his men
in all.
He then despatched Koinos to Bazira,^ convinced that
the inhabitants would capitulate on learning that Massaga
had been captured. He, moreover, sent Attalos, Alketas,
and Demetrios, the captain of cavalry, to another city,
Ora, instructing them to draw a rampart round it, and to
invest it until his own arrival. The inhabitants of this
place sallied out against the troops under Alketas, but the
Macedonians had no great difficulty in routing them, and
driving them back within the walls of the city. As regards
Koinos, matters did not go well with him at Bazira, for as
it stood on a very lofty eminence, and was strongly fortified
in every quarter, the people trusted to the strength of their
position and made no proposals about surrendering.
Alexander, on learning this, set out for Bazira, but as
he knew that some of the barbarians of the neighbouring
country were going to steal unobserved into the city of
Ora, having been sent by Abisares ^ for this very purpose,
he directed his march first to that city. He then sent
orders to Koinos to fortify some strong position as a basis
of operations against the city of the Bazirians, and to leave
in it a sufficient garrison to prevent the inhabitants from
^ Alexander seems to have treated
these mercenaries with less than his
usual generosity towards brave ene-
mies. Plutarch reprobates his slaugh-
ter of them as a foul blot on his
military fame. The attack upon the
city after it had capitulated on terms
admits of no justification.
2 See Note E.
^ Abisares. Arrian in a subsequent
passage calls this chief King of the
Mountaineer Indians. His name
shows that he ruled over Abhisara,
that region of mountain-girt valleys,
now called Hazara, which lies between
the Indus and the upper Hydaspes.
In Hazdra the ancient name of the
country seems to be preserved. It
has been supposed, but less reason-
ably, that the district was so called
from the great number of its petty
chiefs, hazdra being the numeral for
a thousand (in Persian). Abisares
was a very powerful prince, and it is
supposed with reason that Kashmir
was subject to his sway.
THE INVASION OF INDIA
going into the country around for provisions without
fear of danger. He was then to join Alexander with the
remainder of his troops. When the men of Bazira saw
Koinos departing with the bulk of his troops they regarded
the Macedonians who remained, as contemptible antago-
nists, and sallied out into the plain to attack them. A
sharp conflict ensued in which 500 of the barbarians were
slain, and upwards of 70 taken prisoners. The rest fled
together into the city and were more rigorously than ever
debarred all access to the country by the garrison of the
fort. The siege of Ora did not cost Alexander much
labour, for he captured the place at the first assault, and
got possession of all the elephants which had been left
therein.
Chapter XXVIII. — Bazira captured — Alexander marches
to the rock Aornos
When the inhabitants of Bazira heard that Ora had
fallen, they regarded their case as desperate, and at the
dead of night fled from their city to the Rock, as all the
other barbarians were doing, for, having left their cities,
they were fleeing to the rock in that land called Aornos ; ^
for this is a mighty mass of rock in that part of the
country, and a report is current concerning it that even
Herakles, the son of Zeus, had found it to be impregnable.
Now whether the Theban, or the Tyrian, or the Egyptian
Herakles penetrated so far as to the Indians ^ I can neither
^ Aornos. See Note F. -
2 *' Herakles," says Herodotos (ii.
43, 44), " is one of the ancient gods of
the Egyptians, and, as they say them-
selves, it was I7,cx)0 years before the
reign of Amasis, when the number of
their gods was increased from eight
to twelve, of whom Herakles was
accounted one. And being desirous
of obtaining certain information from
whatever source I could, I sailed to
Tyre in Phoenicia, where, as I had
been informed, there was a temple
dedicated to Herakles." The name
of the Egyptian Herakles was Dsona
or Chon, or, according to Pausanias,
Makeris, and that of the Tyrian was
Melkart. These were more ancient
than the Theban Herakles, the son of
Zeus and Alkmene. The Indian
Herakles, called Dorsanes, who, ac-
cording to Arrian, was the father of
Pandaia, has been identified with
S'iva, but also with Balarama, the
eighth avatar ot~Vw}HiUj_ Diodoros
(ii. 39) ascribes to him the building of
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
71
positively affirm nor deny, but I incline to think that he
did not penetrate so far ; for we know how common it
is for men when speaking of things that are difficult
to magnify the difficulty by declaring that it would
• ,*■''
Fig. 8. — The Tyrian Herakles.
baffle even Herakles himself. And in the case of this
rock my own conviction is that Herakles was mentioned
to make the story of its capture all the more wonderful.
The rock is said to have had a circuit of about 200 stadia,
and at its lowest elevation a height of eleven stadia.^ It was
ascended by a single path cut by the hand of man, yet
difficult. On the summit of the rock there was, it is also
said, plenty of pure water which gushed out from a copious
spring. There was timber besides, and as much good
arable land as required for its cultivation the labour of a
thousand men.
Alexander on learning these particulars was seized
with an ardent desire to capture this mountain also, the
story current about Herakles not being the least of the
incentives. With this in view he made Ora and Massaga
strongholds for bridling the districts around them, and at
the same time strengthened the defences of Bazira. The
division under Hephaistion and Perdikkas fortified for him
the walls and of the palace of Pali-
bothra (now Patna). Arrian in the
second book of this work (c. i6)
distinguishes the Tyrian Herakles
from the Egyptian and Argive or
Theban. The latter, he says, lived
about the time of Oidipous, son of
Laios.
^ The Olympic stadium, which was
the chief Greek measure for itinerary
distances, was equal to 600 Greek
feet, 625 Roman feet, and 606 feet 9
inches English. The stadium of this
length was the only one in use before
the third century of our aera.
m^
THE INVASION OF INDIA
another city called Orobatis ^ in which they left a garrison
and then marched on to the river Indus. On reaching it
they began preparing a bridge to span the Indus in
accordance with Alexander's orders.
Alexander now appointed Nikanor, one of the com-
panions, satrap of the country on this side of the Indus,-
and then first marched himself towards that river and
received the submission of the city of Peukelaotis which
lay not far from the Indus. He placed in it a garrison of
Macedonian soldiers under the command of Philippos, and
then occupied himself in reducing other towns — some
small ones — situated near the river Indus.^ He was
accompanied on this occasion by Kophaios and Assagetes
the local chiefs.** On reaching Embolima,^ a city close
^ The site of Orobatis must be
sought for in the district west of Peu-
kelaotis, through which Hephaistion
advanced on his way to the Indus.
The position and name of Arabutt, a
village in this locality where ruins
exist, plainly show its identity with
the Orobatis of the text. It is situ-
ated on the left bank of the Landai,
and is near Naoshera. It is probably
the Oroppa of the Ravenna geo-
grapher.
- Nikanor was succeeded in this
office by Philippos, who was placed
in command of the garrison of Peu-
kelaotis.
^ Peukelaotis, as has been stated,
stood on the Landai at a distance of
seventeen miles north-west from Pesha-
war. Alexander after the fall of Bazira
moved westwards toward that river,
judging it expedient before attacking
the Rock to reduce all the yet un-
conquered region west of the Indus.
He took Peukelaotis, and then directed
his march eastward till he approached
the embouchure of the Kophen,
whence turning northwards he ad-
vanced up the right bank of the Indus
till he reached Embolima, about eight
miles distant from Aornos, and as
high up the river as an army could go.
^ Kophaios, to judge from his name
and from what is here stated, must
have been the ruler of the valley of
the lower Kophen or Kabul river.
Hence it is unlikely, as some have
supposed, that the dominions of
Taxiles lay partly in the country west
of the Indus. I find nothing any-
where in the classical writers lending
countenance to such a supposition.
The name of Assagetes is probably a
transliteration into Greek of the Sans-
krit As'vajity •* gaining horses by
conquest."
^ Ritter taking Embolima to be a
word of Greek origin, equivalent in
meaning to U^oki], "the mouth of a
river," thought that this place lay
opposite to Attak, in the angle of land
where the Kophen discharges into the
Indus, and was thus led to identify
Aornos with the hill in that locality
on which the fort of Raja Hodi
stands. Embolima appears, however,
to be rather a combination of two
native names, Amb and Balimah.
Amb is the name of a fort, now in
ruins, from which runs the ordinary
path up to the summit of Mahaban.
It crowns a position of remarkable
strength, which faces Derbend, a small
town on the opposite side of the Indus.
Not far westward from this fort, and
on the same spur of the Mahaban,
there is another fort also in ruins,
which preserves to this day in the
tradition of the inhabitants the name
of Balimah. It is in accordance with
Indian custom thus to combine into one
the names of two neighbouring places.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
73
adjoining the rock of Aornos,^ he there left Krateros with
a part of the army to gather into the city as much corn as
possible and all other requisites for a long stay, that the
Macedonians having this place as the basis of their
operations might, during a protracted siege, wear out the
defenders of the rock by famine, should it fail to be
captured at the first assault. He himself then advanced
to the rock, taking with him the archers, the Agrianians,
the brigade of Koinos, the lightest and best-armed men
selected from the remainder of the phalanx, 200 of the
companion cavalry, and 100 horse-archers. At the end
of the day's march he encamped on what he took to be a
convenient site. The next day he advanced a little nearer
to the Rock, and again encamped.
Chapter XXIX. — Siege of Aornos
Some men thereupon who belonged to the neighbour-
hood came to him, and after proffering their submission
undertook to guide him to the most assailable part of the
rock, that from which it would not be difificult to capture
the place. With these men he sent Ptolemy, the son of
Lagos, a member of the bodyguard, leading the Agrianians
and the other light-armed troops and the selected hypaspists,
and directed him, on securing the position, to hold it with
a strong guard and to signal to him when he had occupied
it. Ptolemy, who followed a route which proved rough
and otherwise difficult to traverse, succeeded in occupying
the position without being perceived by the barbarians.^
^ See Note F, Aornos.
2 ** All this account," says Abbott,
who takes Aornos to be Mount Maha-
ban, *' will answer well for the Maha-
ban, which is a mountain-table about
five miles in length at summit, scarped
on the east by tremendous precipices
from which descends one large spur
down upon the Indus between Sitana
and Amb. The mountain spur being
comparatively easy of ascent would
not probably be contested by the
natives, who would concentrate their
power to oppose the Macedonians as
they climbed the precipitous fall of
the main summit. The great extent
of the mountain, covered as it is with
pine forest, would enable Ptolemy,
under the guidance of natives, to gain
any distant point of the summit with-
out observation."
74
THE INVASION OF INDIA
The whole circuit of this he fortified with a pah'sade
and a trench, and then raised a beacon on the moun-
tain from which the flame was likely to be seen by
■ Alexander. Alexander did see it, and next day moved
forward with his army, but as the barbarians obstructed
his progress he could do nothing more on account of the
difficult nature of the ground. When the barbarians
perceived that Alexander had found an attack to be
impracticable, they turned round, and in full force fell
upon Ptolemy's men. Between these and the Macedonians
hard fighting ensued, the Indians making strenuous efforts
to destroy the palisade by tearing up the stakes, and
Ptolemy to guard and maintain his position. The bar-
barians were worsted in the skirmish and when night
began to fall withdrew.
From the Indian deserters Alexander selected one
who knew the country and could otherwise be trusted,
and sent him by night to Ptolemy with a letter importing
that when he himself assailed the rock, Ptolemy should
no longer content himself with defending his position but
should fall upon the barbarians on the mountain, so that
the Indians, being attacked in front and rear, might be
perplexed how to act. Alexander, starting at daybreak
from his camp, led his army by the route followed by
Ptolemy when he went up unobserved, being convinced
that if he forced a passage that way, and effected a
junction with Ptolemy's men, the work still before him
would not then be difficult ; and so it turned out ; for up
to mid-day there continued to be hard fighting between
the Indians and the Macedonians — the latter forcing their
way up the ascent, while the former plied them with
missiles as they ascended. But as the Macedonians did
not slacken their efforts, ascending the one after the other,
while those in advance paused to rest, they gained with
much pain and toil the summit of the pass early in the
afternoon, and joined Ptolemy's men. His troops being
now all united, Alexander put them again in motion and
led them against the rock itself; but to get close up
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
75
to it was not yet practicable. So came this day to
its end.
Next day at dawn he ordered the soldiers to cut a
hundred stakes per man. When the stakes had been cut
he began piling them up towards the rock (beginning
from the crown of the hill on which the camp had been
pitched) to form a great mound, whence he thought it would
be possible for arrows and for missiles shot from engines
to reach the defenders. Every one took part in the work
helping to advance the mound. Alexander himself was
present to superintend, commending those that were intent
on getting the work done, and chastising any one that at
the moment was idling.
Chapter XXX. — Capture of Aornos — Advance to
the Indus
The army by the first day's work extended the mound
the length of a stadium, and on the following day the
slingers by slinging stones at the Indians from the mound
just constructed, and the bolts shot at them from the
engines, drove them back whenever they sallied out to
attack the men engaged upon the mound. The work of
piling it up thus went on for three days, without inter-
mission, when on the fourth day a few Macedonians forced
their way to a small hill which was on a level with the
rock, and occupied its crest. Alexander without ever
resting drove the mound towards the hill which the handful
of men had occupied, his object being to join the two
together.
But the Indians terror-struck both by the unheard-of
audacity of the Macedonians in forcing their way to the
hill, and also by seeing that this position was now con-
nected with the mound, abstained from further resistance,
and, sending their herald to Alexander, professed they
were willing to surrender the rock if he granted them
terms of capitulation. But the purpose they had in view
7^
THE INVASION OF INDIA
was to consume the day in spinning out negotiations, and
to disperse by night to their several homes. When Alex-
ander saw this he allowed them to start off as well as to
withdraw the sentinels from the whole circle of outposts.
He did not himself stir until they began their retreat, but,
when they did so, he took with him 700 of the body-
guards and the hypaspists and scaled the rock at the
point abandoned by the enemy. He was himself the first
to reach the top, the Macedonians ascending after him
pulling one another up, some at one place and some at
another. Then at a preconcerted signal they turned upon
the retreating barbarians and slew many of them in the
flight, besides so terrifying some others that in retreating
they flung themselves down the precipices, and were in con-
sequence dashed to death. Alexander thus became master
of the rock which had baffled Herakles himself He sacri-
ficed upon it and built a fort, giving the command of its
garrison to Sisikottos,^ who long before had in Baktra
deserted from the Indians to Bessos, but after Alexander
had conquered the Baktrian land served in his army, and
showed himself a man worthy of all confidence.
He then set out from the rock and invaded the land
of the Assakenians,- for he had been apprised that the
brother of Assakenos, with the elephants and a host of the
barbarians from the adjoining country, had fled for refuge
to the mountains of that land. On reaching Dyrta^ he
found there were no inhabitants either in the city itself
or the surrounding district. So next day he sent out
Nearchos and Antiochos, commanders of the hypaspists,
the former with the light-armed Agrianians, and the latter
valleys or the mountains by which
they were enclosed. Dyrta probably
lay to the north of Mahaban, near
the point where the Indus issues from
the mountains. Court's opinion that
Dyrta was a place so far remote from
the rock as Dir, which lies beyond
the Pafijkora river, seems altogether
improbable. Yet it is adopted by
Lassen, though the regions in which
Dir is situated had already been sub-
dued.
^ His name seems a transliteration
of S'as'igupta, " protected by the
moon."
- That is the eastern part of their
country. He had already reduced the
western and the capital Massaga.
^ On descending the Mahaban by
its northern or western spurs, Alex-
ander would have found himself in
the valleys of Chumla and Buner.
The fugitives from the rock would
no doubt flee for shelter to these
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
n
with his own regiment and other two regiments besides.
They were despatched to examine the nature of the
localities, and to capture, if possible, some of the bar-
barians who might give information about the state of
matters in the country, and particularly about the
elephants, as he was very anxious to know where
they were.
He himself now marched towards the river Indus, and
the army going on before made a road for him, without
which there would have been no means of passing through
that part of the country.^ He there captured a few of
the barbarians, from whom he learned that the Indians of
the country had fled away for refuge to Abisares,^ but had
left their elephants there at pasture near the river Indus.
He ordered these men to show him the way to the
elephants. Now many of the Indians are elephant
hunters,^ and men of this class found favour with him
and were kept in his retinue, and on this occasion he
went with them in pursuit of the elephants. Two of
these animals were killed in the chase by throwing them-
selves down a steep place, but the others on being caught
suffered drivers to mount them, and were added to the
army. He was further fortunate in finding serviceable
timber^ along the river, and this was cut for him by the
army and employed in building boats. These were
taken down the river Indus to the bridge which a
^ " This road," says Abbott, *' was
probably the path leading amongst
precipices above and along the torrent
of the Burindu, a river which, after
watering the valleys of Buner and
Chumla, flows into the Indus above
Amb. The path even now is very
difficult. This would have brought
Alexander back to Amb." On this
route probably lay the pass which
the chief called Eryx by Curtius
and Aphrikes by Diodoros attempted,
but unsuccessfully, to defend against
Alexander. The river Burindu above
mentioned may be identified with the
Parenos of the Greek writers.
■^ In doing so they had of course
to cross over to the left bank of the
Indus.
^ Arrian in his Indika (c. 14) has
described the mode of elephant hunt-
ing practised by the Indians. It is
still in vogue.
^ Abbott points out that at Amb
large quantities of drift timber are
yearly arrested at an eddy near Der-
bend. It is probable, he thinks, that
the pine forest in those days descended
lower down the river than it does at
present. At one time forests of fine
sisoo, mulberry, and willow timber
grew along both banks of the Indus
at that part of its course.
78
THE INVASION OF INDIA
good while before this Hephaistion and Perdikkas had
constructed.^
^ The bridge in all probability
spanned the Indus near Attak, which
stands on a steep and lofty part of
the left bank about two miles below
the junction of the Kabul and Indus.
The width of the latter river at the
fortress of Attak is, according to
Lieutenant Wood who measured it,
286 yards. A little lower down
where the channel is usually spanned
by a bridge of boats it varies, as
stated by Vigne, from 80 to 120 yards.
According to Cunningham, the bridge
was made higher up the river, at
Ohind. From Alexander's campaign
north of the Kabul river, General
Chesney (in a lecture at Simla) hints
that a moral may be drawn : — " We
have been accustomed," he says, "to
consider the country north of the Kabul
river as virtually impregnable. The
march of Alexander's army is a practi-
cal proof to the contrary, and although
he was not burdened with artillery,
and had apparently only mule trans-
port, yet the Greek soldiers all
marched in heavy armour, which
must have added greatly to the
difficulties of warfare among those
mountains. There is an obvious
moral to be drawn by us from these
incidents."
Fifth Book
Chapter I. — Alexander at Nysa
In the country traversed by Alexander between the
Kophen and the river Indus, they say that besides the
cities already mentioned, there stood also the city of
Nysa,^ which owed its foundation to Dionysos, and that
Dionysos founded it when he conquered the Indians,
whoever this Dionysos in reality was, and when or
whencesoever he made his expedition against the Indians;
for I have no means of deciding whether the Theban
Dionysos setting out either from Thebes or the Lydian
Tmolos^ marched with an army against the Indians,
passing through a great many warlike nations unknown
to the Greeks of those days, but without subjugating
any of them by force of arms except only the Indian
nations ; all I know is, that one is not called on to sift
minutely the legends of antiquity concerning the gods ;
for things that are not credible, if one reasons as to their
consistency with the course of nature, do not seem to be
incredible altogether if one takes the divine agency into
account.
When Alexander came to Nysa, the Nysaians sent out
to him their president, whose name was Akouphis,^ and
along with him thirty deputies of their most eminent
citizens, to entreat him to spare the city for the sake of
^ See Note G, Nysa. considered to be a favourite haunt of
^ Mount Tmolos, as we learn the wine-god.
from Virgil, Ovid, and Pliny, was ^ As the Greek ^ represents the hh
famous for its vines. It was therefore of Sanskrit, his name would htAkubhi.
8o
THE INVASION OF INDIA
the god. The deputies, it is said, on entering Alexander's
tent found him sitting in his armour, covered with dust
from his journey, wearing his helmet and grasping his
spear. They fell to the ground in amazement at the sight,
and remained for a long time silent. But when Alexander
had bidden them rise and to be of good courage, then
Akouphis taking up speech thus addressed him.
" The Nysaians entreat you, O King ! to permit them
to be still free and to be governed by their own laws
from reverence towards Dionysos ; for when Dionysos
after conquering the Indian nation was returning to the
shores of Greece he founded with his war-worn soldiers,
who were also his bacchanals, this very city to be a
memorial to posterity of his wanderings and his victory,
just as you have founded yourself an Alexandreia near
Kaukasos, and another Alexandreia in the land of the
Egyptians, not to speak of many others, some of which
you have already founded, while others will follow in
the course of time, just as your achievements exceed in
number those displayed by Dionysos. Now Dionysos
called our city Nysa, and our land the Nysaian, after
the name of his nurse Nysa ; and he besides gave
to the mountain which lies near the city the name of
Meros, because according to the legend he grew, before
his birth, in the thigh of Zeus. And from his time forth
we inhabit Nysa as a free city, and are governed by our
own laws, and are a well-ordered community. But that
Dionysos was our founder, take this as a proof, that ivy
which grows nowhere else in the land of the Indians,
grows with us."^
Chapter II, — Alexander permits the Nysaians to retain their
Autonomy — Visits Mount Meros
It gratified Alexander to hear all this, for he was
desirous that the legends concerning the wanderings of
^ Ivy abounds, however, in Hazara as well as in some other parts of India.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
8i
Dionysos should be believed, as well as that Nysa owed
its foundation to Dionysos, since he had himself reached
the place to which that deity had come, and meant to
penetrate farther than he ; for the Macedonians, he
thought, would not refuse to share his toils if he advanced
with an ambition to rival the exploits of Dionysos. He
therefore confirmed the inhabitants of Nysa in the enjoy-
ment of their freedom and their own laws ; and when he
enquired about their laws, he praised them because the
government of their state was in the hands of the
aristocracy. He moreover requested them to send with
him 300 of their horsemen, together with 100 of their
best men selected from the governing body, which con-
sisted of 300 members. He then asked Akouphis, whom
he appointed governor of the Nysaian land, to make the
selection. When Akouphis heard this, he is said to have
smiled at the request, and when Alexander asked him
why he laughed, to have replied, " How, O King ! can a
single city if deprived of a hundred of its best men con-
tinue to be well-governed ? But if you have the welfare
of the Nysaians at heart, take with you the 300 horsemen,
or, if you wish, even more ; but instead of the hundred of
our best men you have asked me to select, take with you
twice that number of our worst men, so that on your
returning hither you may find the city as well governed
as it is now." By these words he persuaded Alexander,
who thought he spoke sensibly, and who ordered him to
send the horsemen without again asking for the hundred
men who were to have been selected, or even for others
to supply their place. He requested Akouphis, however,
to send him his son and his daughter's son to attend him
on his expedition.
Alexander felt a strong desire to see the place where
the Nysaians boasted to have certain memorials of Diony-
sos. So he went, it is said, to Mount Meros with the
companion cavalry and the body of foot -guards, and
found that the mountain abounded with ivy and laurel
and umbrageous groves of all manner of trees, and that
G
$M
THE INVASION OF INDIA
it had also chases supplied with game of every description.
The Macedonians, to whom the sight of the ivy was par-
ticularly welcome, as it was the first they had seen for
a long time (there being no ivy in the land of the Indians,
even where they have the vine), are said to have set them-
selves at once to weave ivy chaplets, and, accoutred as they
were, to have crowned themselves with these, chanting
the while hymns to Dionysos and invoking the god by
his different names.^ Alexander, they say, offered while
there sacrifice to Dionysos and feasted with his friends.
Some even go so far as to allege, if any one cares to
believe such things, that many of his courtiers, Mace-
donians of no mean rank, while invoking Dionysos,
and wreathed with ivy crowns, were seized with the
inspiration of the god, raised in his honour shouts of
Evoi, and revelled like Bacchanals celebrating the orgies.
Chapter III. — How Eratosthenes views the legends con-
cerning Herakles and Dio7iysos — Alexander crosses
the Indus
Any one who hears these stories is free to believe them
or disbelieve them as he chooses. For my own part, I
do not altogether agree with Eratosthenes the Kyrenian,
who says that all these references to the deity were
circulated by the Macedonians in connection with the
deeds of Alexander, to gratify his pride by grossly
exaggerating their importance. For, to take an instance,
he says that the Macedonians, on seeing a cavern among
the Paropamisadai, and either hearing some local legend
about it, or inventing one themselves, spread a report
that this was beyond doubt the cave in which Prometheus
had been bound, and to which the eagle resorted to prey
upon his vitals, until Herakles, coming that way, slew the
^ His other names were Bacchos, Bromios, and among the Romans
lacchos, Lyaios, Lenaios, Evios, Liber also.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
83
eagle and freed Prometheus from his bonds.^ And again,
he says that the Macedonians transferred the name of
Mount Kaukasos from Pontos to the eastern parts of the
world and the land of the Paropamisadai adjacent to
India (for they called Mount Paropamisos, Kaukasos), to
enhance the glory of Alexander as if he had passed over
Kaukasos. And again, he says that when the Mace-
donians saw in India itself oxen marked with a brand in
the form of a club, they took this as a proof that Herakles
had gone as far as the Indians. Eratosthenes has like-
wise no belief in similar stories about the wanderings of
Dionysos. Whether or not the accounts about them are
true, I cannot decide, and so leave them.
When Alexander arrived at the river Indus he found
a bridge already made over it by Hephaistion, and two
thirty-oared galleys, besides a great many small boats.
He found also a present which had been sent by Taxiles
the Indian, consisting of 200 talents of silver, 3000 oxen
fattened for the shambles, 10,000 sheep or more, and 30
elephants. The same prince had also sent to his assist-
ance a force of 700 horsemen, and these brought word
that Taxiles surrendered into his hands his capital Taxila,
the greatest of all the cities between the river Indus and
the Hydaspes. Alexander there offered sacrifices to the
gods to whom it was his custom to sacrifice, and enter-
tained his army with gymnastic and equestrian contests
^ Arrian writes to the same effect
in his Ittdika, c. 5: "When the
Greeks noticed a cave in the domin-
ions of the Paropamisadai, they
asserted that it was the cave of Pro-
metheus the Titan, in which he had
been suspended for steaHng the fire."
At the distance of thirty-four miles
from Birikot, a place near the river
Swat, is Daityapur, now called Daiti-
Kalli, said to have been built by one
of the Daityas, i.e. enemies of the gods,
such as were the Titans of the Greeks.
In the hill adjacent is a vast cavern
which, as Abbott has suggested, the
companions of Alexander may have
taken to be the cave frequented by
the eagle which preyed upon the
vitals of Prometheus the Titan. At
Bamian, which lies on one of the
routes from Kabul to Baktria, there
are some very notable caves, one of
which, some think, must have been
that which the Greeks took to be the
cave of Prometheus. But Alexander
does not appear to have selected the
Bamian route either in crossing or
recrossing the Kaukasos. The moun-
tains of the real Kaukasos were the
loftiest known to the Greeks before
Alexander's time, and hence to have
crossed them was regarded as a tran-
scendent achievement.
84
THE INVASION OF INDIA
on the banks of the river. The sacrifices proved to be
favourable for his undertaking the passage.
Chapter IV. — General description of t/ie Indus
and of the people of India
That the Indus is the greatest of all the rivers of
Asia, except the Ganges, which is itself an Indian river ;
that its sources lie on this side of the Paropamisos or
Kaukasos ; ^ that it falls into the great sea which washes
the shores of India towards the south wind ; that it has
two mouths, both of which outlets abound with shallows,
like the five mouths of the Ister ; and that it forms a
delta in the land of the Indians closely resembling the
Egyptian Delta, and that this is called in the Indian tongue
Patala,- let this be my description of the Indus, setting
forth those facts which can least be disputed, since the
Hydaspes and the Akesines and the Hydraotes and the
Hyphasis, which are also Indian rivers, are considerably
larger than any other rivers in Asia, but are smaller, I
may even say much smaller, than the Indus, just as also
the Indus itself is smaller than the Ganges. Indeed,
Ktesias (if any one thinks him a proper authority) states
^ Arrian, like other ancient writers,
supposed that the Indus had its sources
in those mountains from which it
emerges into the plains some sixty miles
above Attak. It is now known that
it rises in Tibet on a lofty Himalayan
peak, Mount Kailasa, famous in
Hindu fable as the residence of S'iva
and the Paradise of Kuvera, and
that before it issues into the plains it
has nearly run the half of its course
of about 1800 miles. The number of
its mouths has varied from time to
time. Ptolemy, the geographer, gives
it seven.
- Patala in Sanskrit mythology
denotes the unde} world — the abode
of snakes and demons — to which the
sun at the close of day seems to
descend. It was, therefore,' Ritter
says, the name applied by the Brah-
mans to all the provinces in India
that lay towards sunset. Cunning-
ham, however, suggests that Patali,
a Sanskrit word meaning the trumpet-
Jiower {bignonia stiaveolens) may have
given its name to the Delta "in allu-
sion," he says, "to the 'trumpet'
shape of the province included be-
tween the eastern and western branches
of the mouth of the Indus, as the two
branches as they approach the sea
curve outwards like the mouth of a
trumpet." But could the idea of
such a resemblance have occurred to
the minds of the Indians unless maps
were in use among them ? For a
better etymology see Note U. It has
been conclusively proved that Haidara-
bad is the modern representative of
the ancient Patala.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
85
that where the Indus is narrowest its banks are 40 stadia
apart, and where broadest 100 stadia, while its ordinary
breadth is the mean between these two distances.^
This river Indus Alexander began to cross at day-
break with his army to enter the country of the Indians.
Concerning this people I have, in this present work,
described neither under what laws they live, nor what
strange animals their country produces, nor in what
number and variety fish and water -monsters are bred
in the Indus, the Hydaspes, the Ganges, and other Indian
rivers. Nor have I described the ants which dig up gold
for them, nor its guardians the griffins,^ nor other stories
invented rather to amuse than to convey a knowledge of
facts, since there was no one to expose the falsehood of
any absurd stories told about the Indians. However,
Alexander and those who served in his army did expose
the falsehood of most of them, although some even of these
very men invented lies of their own. They proved also,
in contradiction of the common belief, that the Indians were
goldless, those tribes at least, and they were many, which
Alexander visited with his army ; and that they were not
at all luxurious in their style of living, while they were
of so great a stature ^ that they were amongst the tallest
men in Asia, being five cubits in height, or nearly so. They
were blacker than any other men except the Aethiopians,*
while in the art of war they were far superior to the other
nations by which Asia was at that time inhabited. For
^ The Indus after receiving the
united streams of the great Panjab
rivers is increased in breadth from
600 to 2000 feet. Its breadth is
therefore grossly exaggerated here
unless the extent to which its inunda-
tions spread beyond its banks enters
into the account.
2 See Note H.
^ The Afghans and Rajputs are
still noted for their great stature.
•* The Greek geographers derived
the name of the Aethiopians from oXQw,
I burn ^ and w^, the visage^ and applied
it to all the sun-burnt, dark-com-
plexioned races south of Egypt. As
the Aethiopic language is, however,
purely Semitic, the name, if indi-
genous, must also be Semitic, since,
as Salt states, the Abyssinians to
this day call themselves Itiopjawan.
Herodotus (vii. 70) speaks of Asiatic
Aethiopians. These served in the
army which Darius led into Greece,
and were marshalled with the Indians,
and did not at all differ from the
others in appearance, but cnly in
their language and in their hair,
which was straight, while that of the
Aethiopians of Libya (Africa) was
woolly.
86
THE INVASION OF INDIA
I cannot make any proper comparison between the Indians
and the race of ancient Persians, who, under the command
of Cyrus, the son of Kambyses, wrested the supremacy of
Asia from the Medes, and added to their empire other
nations, some by conquest and others by voluntary sub-
mission ; for the Persians of those days were but a poor
people, inhabiting a rugged country and approximating
closely in the austerity of their laws and usages to the
Spartan discipline.^ Then with regard to the discomfiture
of the Persians in the Skythian land, I cannot with
certainty conjecture to what cause it was attributable,
whether to the difficult nature of the country into which
they were led, or to some other mistake made by Cyrus,
or whether it was that the Persians were inferior in the
art of war to those Skythians whose territories they
invaded."
Chapter V. — T/ie rivers and vioun tarns of Asia
However, I shall treat of the Indians in a separate
work,' in which I shall set down whatever seems to be
most credible in the reports supplied by those who
accompanied Alexander in his expedition, and by
Nearchos who made a voyage round the Great Sea which
adjoins the Indians. I shall then add the accounts of the
country which were compiled by Megasthenes and
Eratosthenes, who are both writers of standard authority.
^ The Persians were originally the
inhabitants of that poor and insignifi-
cant province called Persis, which
was included between the Persian
Gulf in the south and Media in the
north, and which stretched eastward
from Susiana (Elam) to the deserts
of Karmania. The great empire
won by their amis, extended from
the Mediterranean to the Jaxartes
and Indus. Xenophon says that the
Persians in early times led a life of
penury and hard toil, as they in-
habited a iiigged country which they
cultivated with their own hands
{Kyrop. vii. 5, 67).
- Cyrus is said to have perished in
this expedition against the Skythians,
who lived beyond the Jaxartes, and
were led by Queen Tomyris. The
account of this expedition, given by
Herodotos in the closing chapters of
his first book, is examined at length
by Duncker in the sixth volume of his
History of Antiquity, pp. 11 2- 1 24.
Xenophon represents Cyrus as dying
in peace at an advanced age.
^ Called the Indika, written in the
Ionic dialect, and based chiefly on the
works (now lost) of Megasthenes and
Nearchos.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
87
I shall describe the customs of the Indians and the
remarkable animals which their country is said to produce,
and also the voyage which was made by Nearchos in the
outer sea.^ In the meantime it will suffice if I content
myself with describing only what seems requisite to make
the account of Alexander's operations clearly intelligible.
Mount Tauros divides Asia, beginning from Mykale, the
mountain which lies opposite to the island of Samos ;
then forming the boundary of the country of the Pam-
phylians and Kilikians, it stretches onwards to Armenia.
From the Armenians it passes into Media, and runs
through the country of the Parthians and the Khorasmians.
Reaching Baktria it there unites with Mount Parapamisos,
which the Macedonians of Alexander's army called the
Kaukasos, for the purpose, it is said, of magnifying the
deeds of Alexander, for it could thus be said that he had
carried his victorious arms even beyond the Kaukasos.
It is possible, however, that this mountain range may be
a continuation of that other Kaukasos which is in Skythia,
in the same way as it is a continuation of the Tauric
range. For this reason I have before this occasionally
called this range Kaukasos, and in future I mean to call
it so. This Kaukasos extends as far as the great Indian
Ocean in the direction of the east.^ All the important
rivers of Asia accordingly rise either in Mount Tauros or
Mount Kaukasos, and shape their courses some to the
north, and others to the south. Those which run north-
ward discharge their waters either into the Maiotic Lake,
or into the Hyrkanian Sea, which is in reality a gulf of
the Great Sea.^ The rivers which run southward are the
1 The Indian Ocean and Persian
Gulf, in contrast to the interior sea
or Mediterranean.
2 By the Indian Ocean (called
immediately afterwards the Great
Sea) is meant here the Bay of Bengal
and the ocean beyond, then unknown,
which extended to the shores of
China. By the Kaukasos, which ex-
tended to this eastern ocean, is meant
the vast Himalayan range.
^ Regarding the Maiotic Lake,
now generally called the Sea of Azof,
the ancients entertained very hazy
and inaccurate notions. They sup-
posed it to be situated in the remotest
regions of the earth (Aisch. Prom.
427), and to be almost equal in size
to the Euxine (Herod, iv. 86).
Arrian, who might have known better,
seems here to have adopted the crude
notion current in Alexander's time
88
THE INVASION OF INDIA
Euphrates, Tigris, Indus, Hydaspes, Akesines, Hydradtes,
and Hyphasis, together with the rivers between these and
the Ganges. All these either enter the sea, or, like the
Euphrates, disappear among the swamps which receive
their waters.
Cfuxpter VI.— Position and boundaries of India and how
its plains may have been formed
If anyone takes this view of Asia, that it is divided
by the Tauros and the Kaukasos from west to east
then he finds that it is formed by the Tauros itself into
two great sections, one of which lies towards the south
and the south wind, and the other towards the north and
the north wind. The southern section is divided into
four parts, of which, according to Eratosthenes, India is
the largest, this being also the opinion of Megasthenes
who resided with Siburtios the satrap of Arakh6sia and
who tells us that he frequently visited Sandrakottos the
king of the Indians.' They say that the smallest part is
that which IS bounded by the river Euphrates, and which
extends to our own inland sea, while the other two parts
which lie between the river Euphrates and the Indus will
scarcely bear comparison with India even if both were
taken together. They also say that India is bounded
towards the east and the east wind as far as the south
by the Great Sea, and towards the north by Mount
Kaukasos, as far as its junction with the Tauros, while
the river Indus cuts it off from other countries towards
the west and the north-west wind as far as the Great Sea
The larger portion of India is a plain, and this, as they
conjecture, has been formed from the alluvial deposits of
„^! J K ^ T""^'' "'■ ^°" ">enes was sent on frequent em-
KSn'^er""jK'"^*r'"u" '^■'^^ '° Sandrakottos!T«t that
IS guiltless of this geographical heresy.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
89
the rivers, just as in other countries plains which are not
far off from the sea are generally formations of their
respective rivers, a fact which explains why the names of
such countries were applied of old to their rivers. There
is, for instance, in the country of Asia the plain of the
Hermos, a river which rises in the mountain of Mother
Dindymene, and on its way to the sea flows past the
Aiolian city of Smyrna. There is again another Lydian
plain, called that of the Kaystros, which is a Lydian
river, and another plain in Mysia, that of the Kaikos,
and another in Karia, that of the Maiandros, which extends
as far as the Ionian city of Miletos. In the case of Egypt
again, the two historians, Herodotos, and Hekataios (or
at any rate the author of the work on Egypt, if he was
other than Hekataios) agree in declaring that in the same
way Egypt was the gift of its river,^ and clear pr'oofs
have been adduced by Herodotos in support of this view,
so that even the country itself got perhaps its name from
the river, for that in early times Aigyptos was the name
of the river which the Egyptians and other nations now
call the Nile the words of Homer sufficiently prove, since
he says - that Menelaos anchored his ships at the mouth
of the river Aigyptos. Now if the rivers we have men-
tioned, which are of no great size, can each of them
separately form in its course to the sea a large tract of
new country, by carrying down silt and slime from the
upland districts in which they have their sources, there
can be no good reason for doubting that India is mostly
a plain which has been formed by the alluvial deposits of
its rivers.^ For if the Hermos and the Kaystros and
the Kaikos and the Maiandros and the other rivers of
^ See Herodotos, ii. 5. Diodoros
applies to Lower Egypt the epithet
iroTaixoxiaffTos, i.e. deposited by the
river.
2 See Odyssey J iv. 477, 581.
^ Modern science confirms this
theory. Thus Sir W. Hunter in his
Brief History of the Indian People,
says: "In order to understand the
Indian plains we must have a clear
idea of the part played by these great
rivers ; for the rivers first create the
land, then fertilize it, and finally dis-
tribute its produce. The plains were
in many parts upheaved by volcanic
action, or deposited in an aqueous
aera long before man appeared on
the earth. "
90
THE INVASION OF INDIA
V
Asia which fall into the inland sea were united, they
could not be compared in volume of water with one of
the Indian rivers, and much less with the Ganges, which
is the greatest of them all, and with which neither the
volume of the Egyptian Nile, nor the Istros (Danube)
which flows through Europe, can be for a moment com-
pared. Nay, the whole of those rivers if combined into
one would not be equal to the Indus, which is already
a large river where it issues from its springs, and which
after receiving as tributaries fifteen rivers,^ all greater than
those of Asia, enters the sea still retaining its own name.
Let these remarks which I have made about the country
of the Indians suffice for the present, while I reserve all
other particulars for my description of India.
Chapter VII . — The bridging of rivers
In what manner Alexander made his bridge over the
Indus neither Aristoboulos nor Ptolemy, the authorities
whom I chiefly follow, have given any account ; nor can
I decide for certain whether the passage was bridged with
boats, as was the Hellespont by Xerxes and as were the
Bosporos and the Istros by Darius,^ or whether the bridge
he made over the river was one continuous piece of work.
I incline, however, to think that the bridge must have
been made of boats,^ for neither would the depth of the
river have admitted the construction of an ordinary kind
of bridge, nor could a work so vast and difificult have been
executed in so short a time. But if the passage was
bridged with boats I cannot decide whether the vessels
being fastened together with cables and anchored in a
row sufficed to form a bridge as did those by which, as
Herodotos the Halikarnassian says, the Hellespont was
joined, or whether the method was that which is used by
the Romans in bridging the Istros and the Keltic Rhine,*
2c' V' ... , . , made by a bridge of boats.
T^. f/^^"^^°^-V"- 33-36; IV. 83,97, * There is a Rhenos in Italy-the
33- HI. Reno, a tributary of the Po, from
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT 91
and by which they bridged the Euphrates and the Tigris
as often as necessity required. Since, however, the
Romans, as far as my knowledge goes, have found that
the bridging of rivers by boats is the most expeditious
method of crossing them, I think it worth a description
here. The vessels at a preconcerted signal are let go
from their moorings and rowed down stream not prow but
stern foremost. The current of course carries them down-
ward, but a small pinnace furnished with oars holds
them back till they settle into their appointed place.
Then baskets of wicker work, pyramid-shaped and filled
with rough stones, are lowered into the river from the
prow of each vessel to make it hold fast against the force
of the current. As soon as one of those vessels has been
held fast another is in the same way anchored with its
prow against the stream as far from the first as is com-
mensurate with their bearing the strain of what is put
upon them. On both of them beams of wood are rapidly
laid lengthwise, and on these again planks are placed
crosswise to bind them together. In this manner the
work proceeds through all the vessels which are required
for bridging the passage. At each end of the structure
firmly fixed railed gangways are thrown forward to the
shore so that horses and beasts of burden may with the
greater safety enter upon it. These gangways serve at
the same time to bind the bridge to the shore. In a
short time the whole is completed amid great noise and
bustle, though discipline is by no means lost sight of as
the work proceeds. In each vessel the occasional exhorta-
tions of the overseers and their rebukes of negligence
neither prevent orders from being heard nor the work
from being quickly executed.
which the great Rhine is distinguished
as the Keltic. The famous bridge
made by Caesar over the latter river is
described in his £>e Bello GallicOt
iv. 17.
92
THE INVASION OF INDIA
Chapter VIII. — Alexander arrives at Taxila — Receives an
embassy from Abisarcs and advances to the Hydaspes
This method has been practised by the Romans from
of old, but how Alexander bridged the river Indus I
cannot say, for even those who served in his army are
silent on the matter. But the bridge was made, I should
think, as nearly as possible in the Way described, or if it
was otherwise contrived let it be so.
When Alexander had crossed to the other side of the
Indus he again offered sacrifice according to his custom.
Then marching away from the Indus he arrived at Taxila,^
a great and flourishing city, the greatest indeed of all the
cities which lay between the river Indus and the Hydas-
pes. Taxiles, the governor of the city, and the Indians
who belonged to it received him in a friendly manner,
and he therefore added as much of the adjacent country
to their territory as they requested. While he was there
Abisares, the king of the Indians of the hill-country, sent
him an embassy which included his own brother and other
grandees of his court. Envoys came also from Doxares,
the chief of the province, and those like the others brought
presents. Here again in Taxila Alexander offered his
customary sacrifices and celebrated a gymnastic and
equestrian contest. Having appointed Philip, the son of
Makhatas, satrap of the Indians of that district, he left a
garrison in Taxila and those soldiers who were invalided,
and then moved on towards the river Hydaspes — for he
had learned that Poros with the whole of his army lay on
the other side of that river resolved either to prevent him
from making the passage or to attack him when crossing.^
^ See Note I, Taxila.
^ We learn from Curtius that
Alexander, before taking hostile
action against Poros, demanded from
him through an envoy called Cleo-
chares that he should pay tribute and
come to meet him on the frontiers of
his dominions. To this Poros replied
that in compliance with the second
request he would meet Alexander at
the place appointed, but would attend
in arms. Alexander was perhaps
justified by the laws of war in exact-
ing submission from the tribes west
of the Indus, since these had been
subject to Darius, whom he had over-
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
93
Upon learning this Alexander sent back Koinos, the son
of Polemokrates, to the river Indus with orders to cut in
pieces all the boats that had been constructed for the
passage of the Indus and to bring them to the river
Hydaspes. In accordance with these orders the smaller
boats were cut each into two sections and the thirty-oared
galleys into three, and the sections were then transported
on waggons to the banks of the Hydaspes. There the
boats were reconstructed, and appeared as a flotilla upon
that river. Alexander then taking the forces which he
had with him when he arrived at Taxila and 5000 of the
Indians commanded by Taxiles and the chiefs of that
country advanced towards the Hydaspes.^
thrown, and to whose rights he had
succeeded, but the tribes of the Panjab,
those at least that lay to the east of
the Hydaspes, had never, so far as is
known, been under Persian domina-
tion, and hence his invasion, accord-
ing to modern ideas, was altogether
indefensible. He could, however,
justify himself on the ground of the
principles held by the Greeks of his
day, who considered that their superi-
ority in wisdom and virtue teethe rest
of mankind gave them a natural right
to attack, plunder, and enslave all
barbarians except such only as were
protected by a special treaty. Such
a view, repugnant as it seems to every
principle of justice, was held never-
theless by Aristotle, who no doubt
impressed it on the mind of his illus-
trious pupil. Hence Alexander, in
attacking Poros, was not conscious,
like Caesar, when he invaded Britain,
of perpetrating an unwarrantable
aggression for which some kind of an
excuse had to be trumped up.
1 The Hydaspes, now the Jhllam,
is called by the natives of Kas'mir,
where it rises, the Bedasta, which is
but a slightly altered form of its
Sanskrit name, the Vitasta, which
means ' ' wide-spread. " In Ptolemy^s
geography it appears as the Bidaspes
— a form nearer the original than
Hydasph. It is mentioned in one of
the hymns of the Rig - Veda, along
with other great Indian rivers :
" Receive favourably this my hymn,
O Ganga, Yamuna, Sarasvati, S'utudri,
Parashni ; hear O Marudvridha, with
the Asikni and Vitasta, and thou
Arjikiya with the Sushoma." In
advancing from the Indus at Attak to
the Hydaspes, Alexander followed
the Rajapatha, that is, the kings
highway, called by Megasthenes the
656s ^aaCK-qi-q. It is the route which
has been taken by all foreign con-
querors who have penetrated into
India by the valley of the Kophes.
Elphinstone, who followed this route
in returning from Kabul, describes it
thus: "The whole of our journey
across the track between the Indus
and Hydaspes was about 160 miles ;
for which space the country is among
the strongest I have ever seen. The
difficulty of our passage across it was
increased by heavy rain. While in
the hilly country our road sometimes
lay through the beds of torrents"
{Missio7i to Kabul, p. 78). In another
passage (p. 80) he says: *'I was
greatly struck with the difference
between the banks of this river ; the
left bank had all the characteristics of
the plains of India. The right bank,
on the contrary, was formed by the
end of the range of the Salt Hills,
and had an air of extreme ruggedness
and wildness that must inspire a
fearful presentiment of the country
he was entering into the mind of
a traveller from the East." General
THE INVASION OF INDIA
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
95
Chapter IX, — Alexander on reaching the Hydaspcs finds
Poros prepared to dispute its passage
Alexander encamped on the banks of the river,^ and
Poros was seen on the opposite side, with all his army
and his array of elephants around him.^ Against the
place where he saw Alexander had encamped, he
remained himself to guard the passage, but he sent
detachments of his men, each commanded by a captain,
to guard all parts of the river where it could be easily
forded, as he was resolved to prevent the Macedonians
from effecting a landing. When Alexander saw this, he
thought it expedient to move his army from place to
place, so that Poros might be at a loss to discover his real
intentions. For this purpose he divided his army into
many parts, and some of the troops he led himself in
different directions, sometimes to ravage the enemy's
country, and sometimes to find out where he could most
easily ford the river. He placed various commanders at
various times over different divisions of his army, and
despatched them also in different directions. At the
same time he caused provisions to be conveyed to the
camp from all parts of the country on this side of the
river, to impress Poros with the conviction that he
intended to remain where he was near the bank^ till
the waters of the river subsided in winter, and afforded
him a large choice of passages. As the boats were
constantly plying up and down the stream, and the
Chesney, in the lecture already cited,
thus remarks on the advance of Alex-
ander to the Hydaspes: "What is
remarkable about this part of the
advance is that it was not made direct
on Jhelum, as would appear natural.
True, that line is over what would be
a very difficult country, as any traveller
by the existing road knows. Still it
would be the easiest line ; neverthe-
less it appears certain that Alexander
took a more southerly line, and
threading his way through the intri-
cate ravines of the upper part of the
Salt range, and leaving Tilla and
Rhotas on his left, penetrated that
range by the gorge through which
runs the Bhundar river, and struck
the river Jhelum at Jalalpur, about
thirty miles below Jhelum."
^ See Note I, Site of Alexander's
camp on the Hydaspes.
'^ The Greeks, for the first time,
saw elephants used in war at the
battle of Arbela.
skins were being filled with hay, while all the bank was
lined, here with horse and there with foot, all this
prevented Poros from resting and concentrating his
preparations at any one point selected in preference to
any other as the best for defending the passage. At
this time of the year besides, all the Indian rivers were
swollen and flowing with turbid and rapid currents, for
the sun is then wont to turn towards the summer tropic.^
At this season incessant rains deluge the soil of India,
and the snows of the Kaukasos then melting flood the
numerous rivers to which they give birth. In winter
they again subside and become small and clear, and
in many places fordable, with the exception of the
Indus and the Ganges, and perhaps some one or two
others. The Hydaspes at all events does become
fordable.
Chapter X. — Alexander's devices to deceive Porvs and
steal the passage of the river
Alexander therefore publicly announced that he
would remain where he was throughout that season of
the year if his passage was for the present to be
obstructed, but he continued as before waiting in ambush
to see whether he could anywhere rapidly steal a passage
to the other side without being observed. He clearly
saw that it was impossible for him to cross where Poros
himself had encamped near the bank of the Hydaspes,
not only because he had so many elephants, but also
because his large army arrayed for battle, and splendidly
accoutred, was ready to attack his troops the moment they
^ Arrian, in the nineteenth chapter
of this book, states that the battle
with Poros was fought in the Archon-
ship of Hegemon at Athens, in the
month of Mounychion, i.e. between
the iSth of April and i8th of May,
326 B.C. Here, however, according
to the reading of all the MSS., he
makes the battle take place after the
solstice of June 21st, }x^rk Tpoirds.
Editors remove the difficulty by sub-
stituting /card for fieTd, and I have
translated accordingly. As the rainy
season, however, does not set in till
near the end of June, and it had set
in, as Strabo informs us, during the
march to the Hydaspes, the later date
has probability in its favour.
u
THE INVASION OF INDIA
landed. He foresaw besides that his horses would refuse
to mount the opposite bank, where the elephants would
at once encounter them, and by their very aspect and
their roaring would terrify them outright; nor did he
think that even before they gained the shore they would
remain upon the inflated hides during the passage ; but
that on seeing the elephants even at a distance off, they
would become frantic and leap into the water. He
resolved therefore to steal the passage, and to do this in
the following way. Leading out by night the greater
part of his cavalry along the river bank in different
directions, he ordered them to set up a loud clamour,
raise the war-shout,^ and fill the shores with every kind
of noise, as if they were really preparing to attempt the
passage. Poros marched meanwhile along the opposite
bank, in the direction of the noise, having his elephants
with him, and Alexander gradually accustomed him to
lead out his men in this way in opposition. When this
had been done repeatedly, and the men did nothing more
than make a great noise and shout the war-cry, Poros no
longer made any counter-movement when the cavalry
issued out from the camp, but remained within his own
lines, his spies being, however, posted at numerous points
along the bank. When Alexander had thus quieted the
suspicions of Poros about his nocturnal attempts, he
devised the following stratagem.
Chapter XL — Arrangements made by Alexander for
crossing the Hydaspes unobserved
There was a bluff ascending from the bank of the
Hydaspes at a point where the river made a remarkable
bend, and this was densely covered with all sorts of trees.
Over against it lay an island in the river overspread with
jungle, an untrodden and solitary place. Perceiving that
this island directly faced the bluff, and that both places
^ Enyalios, an epithet of the war-god.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
97
>yere wooded and adapted to screen his attempt to cross
the river, he decided to take his army over this way.
Now the bluff and the island were 150 stadia distant
from the great camp.^ But along the whole of the bank
he had posted running sentries ^ at a proper distance for
keeping each other in sight, and readily transmitting
along the line any orders that might be received from
any quarter. In every direction, moreover, shouts were
raised by night, and fires were burnt for many nights
together. But when he had made up his mind to attempt
the passage, the preparations for crossing were made in
the camp without any concealment. In the camp
Krateros had been left with his own division of the
cavalry, and the Arakhosian and Parapamisadan horse-
men, together with the brigades of the Macedonian
phalanx commanded by Alketas and Polysperchon and
the contingent of 5000 men under the chiefs of the
hither Indians. He had ordered Krateros not to attempt
to cross the river before Poros moved off against them, or
before learning that he was flying from the field, and
that they were victorious. " If, however," said he, " Poros
with one part of his army advances against me while he
^ Curtius mentions that near the
bluff there was a deep hollow or
ravine which sufficed to screen both
the infantry and the cavalry, and on this
Cunningham remarks: '* There is a
ravine to the north of Jalalpur which
exactly suits the descriptions of the
historians. This ravine is the bed of
the Kandar Nala, which has a course
of six miles from its source down to
Jalalpur, where it is lost in a waste
of sand. Up this ravine there has
always been a passable, but difficult
road towards Jhelum. From the
head of the Kandar this road proceeds
for three miles in a northerly direc-
tion down another ravine called the
Kasi, Which then turns suddenly to
the east for six and a half miles, and
then again one and a half mile to the
south, where it joins the river Jhelum
immediately below Dilawar, the whole
distance from Jalalpur being exactly
seventeen miles." These seventeen
miles are about the equivalent of the
150 stadia given by Arrian as the
distance from the great camp to the
bluff.
2 "Arrian," says Cunningham,
"records that Alexander placed run-
ning sentries along the bank of the
river at such distances that they could
see each other and communicate his
orders. Now, I believe that this opera-
tion could not be carried out in the
face of an observant enemy along any
part of the river bank, excepting only
that one part which lies between
Jalalpur and Dilawar. In all other
parts the west bank is open and ex-
posed, but in this part alone the
wooded and rocky hills slope down
to the river and offer sufficient cover
for the concealment of single sentries."
— Geog. of Anc. India, pp. 170, 171.
H
98
THE INVASION OF INDIA
leaves the other part and his elephants in his camp, then
please to remain where you are ; but if Poros takes all
his elephants with him, and a portion of the rest of his
army is left behind in the camp, then do you cross the
river with all possible speed ; for," added he, " it is the
elephants only which make it impossible for the horses to
land on the other bank. The rest of the army can cross
over without difficulty."
Chapter XIL — Alexander crosses the Hydaspes
Such were the instructions given to Krateros ; but
half-way between the island and the main camp in which
he had been left, there were posted Meleager, Attalos and
Gorgias, with the mercenary cavalry and infantry, who
had received orders to cross to the other side in detach-
ments, into which their ranks were to be separated as soon
as they saw the Indians fairly engaged in battle. He
then selected to be taken under his own command the
corps of body-guards called Companions, the regiments of
cavalry under Hephaistidn, Perdikkas and Demetrios, also
the Baktrian, Sogdian, and Skythian cavalry, and the
Daan horse-archers, and from the phalanx of infantry the
hypaspists, the brigade of Kleitos and Koinos, and the
archers and the Agrianians, and with these troops he
marched with secrecy, keeping at a considerable distance
from the bank that he might not be seen to be moving
towards the island and the bluff, from which he intended
to cross over to the other side. There in the night the
skins, which had long before been provided for the purpose,
were stuffed with hay, and securely stitched up. During
the night a violent storm of rain came on, whereby his
preparations and the attempt at crossing were not betrayed
to the enemy by the rattle of arms and the shouting of
orders, since the thunder and rain drowned all other sounds.
Most of the boats which he had ordered to be cut into
sections had been conveyed to this place, and when secretly
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
99
pieced together again were hidden away in the woods
along with the thirty-oared galleys. Towards daybreak the
wind had died down and the rain ceased. The rest of
the army then crossed over in the direction of the island,
the cavalry mounted on the skin pontoon rafts, and as
many of the foot-soldiers as the boats could hold em-
barked in them. They so proceeded, that they were not
seen by the sentries posted by Poros till they had
passed beyond the island, and were not far from the
bank.
Chapter XIII . — hicidents of the passage of the river
Alexander himself embarked on a thirty-oared galley,
and went over accompanied by Ptolemy, Perdikkas, and
Lysimachos, his body-guards, and by Seleukos, one of
the companions, who was afterwards king, and by one
half of the hypaspists, the other half being on board of
the other galleys of like size. As soon as the soldiers
had passed beyond the island, they steered for the bank,
being now full in view of the enemy, whose sentinels on
seeing their approach galloped off at the utmost speed of
each man's horse to carry the tidings to Poros. Mean-
while Alexander was himself the first to disembark, and
taking the horsemen who had been conveyed over in his
own and the other thirty-oared galleys, he at once formed
them into line as they kept landing, for the cavalry had
orders to be the first to disembark. At the head of these
duly marshalled he moved forward. Owing, however, to
his ignorance of the locality he had unawares landed not
on the mamland, but upon an island, the great size of
which prevented it all the more from being recognised
as an island. It was separated from the mainland by a
branch of the river in which the water was shallow ; but
the violent storm of rain which had lasted the most of
the night had so swollen the stream that the horsemen
could not find the ford, and he feared that the latter part
of the passage would be as laborious as the first. When
lOO
THE INVASION OF INDIA
at last the ford was found he led his men through it with
difficulty ; for the water where deepest reached higher
than the breasts of the foot soldiers, and as for the horses
their heads only were above the river. When he had
crossed this piece of water also, he selected the mounted
corps of body-guards, and the best men from the other
squadrons of cavalry, and brought them from column
into line upon the right wing.^ Then in front of all the
cavalry he posted the horse archers, and next in line to
the cavalry and in front of all the infantry the royal
hypaspists commanded by Seleukos. Next to these
again he placed the royal foot guards, and then the
other hypaspists, each in what happened to be the order
of his precedence for the time being. At each extremity
of the phalanx were posted the archers and the Agrianians
and the javelin men.
I Chapter XIV. — Skirmish with the son of Poros at the
landing-place
Alexander having made these dispositions, ordered the
infantry, which numbered nearly 6000 men, to follow
him at the ordinary marching pace and in regular order,
for when he saw that he was superior in cavalry, he took
with himself only the horsemen, about 5000 in number,
and led them forward at a rapid pace. Taur6n, the
captain of the archers, he ordered to hasten forward
with his men to give support to the cavalry. He
had come to the conclusion that if Poros engaged him
with all his troops he would either, without difficulty,
overpower him by charging with his cavalry, or would
remain on the defensive till the infantry came up during
^ With Alexander's passage of the
Hydaspes may be compared Hanni-
bal's passage of the Rhone made
upwards of a century later. The
Carthaginian general, whose education
included a knowledge of Greek, was
no doubt familiar with the history of
Alexander's wars, and from knowing
how the Hydaspes was crossed may
have laid his plans for crossing the
Rhone, v, Livy, xxi. 26-28 ; Polyb.
iii. 45, 46.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
lOI
the action, or that if the Indians, terrified by the mar-
vellous audacity of his passage of the river, should take
to flight, he would be able to pursue them closely, and
the slaughter being thus all the greater there would not
be left much more work for him to do.
Aristoboulos says that the son of Poros arrived with
about 60 chariots before Alexander made the final pas-
sage from the large island, and that he could have
hindered Alexander from landing (for he made the
passage with difficulty even when no one opposed him),
if the Indians had but leaped down from their chariots
and fallen upon those who first stepped on shore. The
prince, however, passed by with his chariots, and allowed
Alexander to accomplish the passage in complete safety.
Against these Indians Alexander, he says, despatched
his horse archers, who easily put them to a rout which
was by no means bloodless. Other writers say that
while the troops were landing an encounter took place
between the Indians who had come with the son of
Poros and Alexander at the head of his cavalry, and
that as the son of Poros had come with a superior force
Alexander himself was wounded by the Indian prince,
and that his favourite horse Boukephalas was killed,
having been wounded, like his master, by the son of
Poros. But Ptolemy, the son of Lagos, with whom I
agree, gives a different account, for he states, like the
others, that Poros sent off his son, but not in command
of merely 60 chariots ; and indeed it is not at all likely
that Poros, on learning from the scouts that either Alex-
ander himself, or, at all events, a part of his army, had
made the passage of the Hydaspes, would have sent his
own son with no more than 60 chariots, which, con-
sidered as a reconnoitring party, would have been too
numerous, and not rapid in retreat, but considered as
meant to repel such of the enemy as had not yet crossed
the river, and to attack those who had already landed, an
altogether inadequate force. He says that the son of
Poros arrived at the head of 2000 men and 1 20 chariots,
102
THE INVASION OF INDIA
and that Alexander had made even the final passage
from the island before the prince appeared upon the
scene.
Chapter XV, — The arrangements made by Poros for the
conflict
Ptolemy states further that Alexander at first de-
spatched against the prince the horse archers, and led
the cavalry himself, under the belief that Poros was
advancing against him with the whole of his army, and
that this was a body of advanced cavalry thrown for-
ward by Pdros. But when he discovered what the real
strength of the Indians was he then briskly charged
them with what cavalry he had with him. When they
noticed that Alexander himself and his body of cavalry
did not charge them in an extended line, but by squad-
rons, their ranks gave way, and 400 of their horsemen
fell, and among them the son of Poros. Their chariots,
moreover, were captured, horses and all, for they proved
heavy in the retreat and useless in the action itself, by
having stuck fast in the clay. When the horsemen who
had escaped from this rout reported one after another to
Poros that Alexander himself had crossed the river with
the strongest division of his army, and that his son had
been slain in the fight, he was still at a loss what to
determine, for the division which had been left with
Krateros in the great camp right opposite to his own
position appeared to be undertaking the passage, but he
at last decided to march with all his forces against Alex-
ander and fight it out with the strongest division of the
Macedonians led by the king in person. He nevertheless
left there in his camp a few of the elephants and a small
force to deter the cavalry under the command of Krateros
from landing. He then took all his cavalry, 4000 strong,
all his chariots, 300 in number, 200 of his elephants,
and 30,000 efficient infantry, and marched against Alex-
ander. When he found a place where he saw there was
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
103
no clay, but that the ground from its sandy nature was
all flat and firm, and suited for the movements of cavalry
whether charging or falling back, he then drew up his
army in order of battle,^ posting his elephants in the
front line at intervals of at least 100 feet, so as to have
his elephants ranged in front before the whole body of
his infantry, and so to spread terror at all points among
Alexander's cavalry. He took it for certain besides that
none of the enemy would have the audacity to push in
at the intervals between the elephants — not the cavalry,
since their horses would be terrified by these animals, and
much less the infantry, since they would be checked in
front by his heavy-armed foot soldiers falling upon them,
and trampled down when the elephants wheeled round
upon them. Behind these he drew up his infantry,
which did not close up in one line with the elephants,
but formed a second line in their rear, so that the
regiments were only partly pushed forward into the
intervals. He had also troops of infantry posted on the
wings beyond the elephants, and on both sides of the
infantry the cavalry had been drawn up, and in front of
it the chariots.
Chapter XVI. — The plan of attack adopted by Alexander
In this manner had Poros arranged his troops. As
soon as Alexander perceived that the Indians had been
drawn up in battle order he made his cavalry halt, that
he might get in hand each regiment of the infantry as it
came up ; and even when the phalanx by a rapid march
had effected a junction with the cavalry he still did not
at once marshal its ranks and lead it into action, and
thus expose the men, while tired and out of breath, to
the barbarians, who were quite fresh, but he gave them
time, while he rode round their ranks, to rest until they
1 Here, or in the immediate neigh- sion the inferiority of the British com-
bourhood, was fought, in 1849, the mander as a strategist to Alexander
battle of Chilianwala. On this occa- was signally manifested.
I04
THE INVASION OF INDIA
could recover themselves. When he had observed how
the Indians were arranged he made up his mind not to
advance against the centre, in front of which the elephants
had been posted, while the intervals between them had
been filled with compact masses of infantry, for he feared
lest Poros should reap the advantage which he had cal-
culated on deriving from that arrangement. But as he
was superior in cavalry he took the greater part of that
force, and marched along towards the left wing of the
enemy to make his attack in this quarter.^ Koinos he
sent at the head of his own regiment of horse and that
of Demetrios to the right, and ordered him, when the
barbarians on seeing what a dense mass of cavalry was
opposed to them, should be riding along to encounter it,
to hang close upon their rear.^ The command of the
phalanx of infantry he committed to Seleukos, Antigenes,
and Tauron, who received orders not to take part in the
action till they saw that the phalanx of infantry and the
cavalry of the enemy were thrown into disorder by the
cavalry under his own command.
When the Indians were now within reach of his
missiles he despatched against their left wing the horse
archers, who were looo strong, to throw the enemy in
that part of the field into confusion with storms of arrows
and charges of their horses. He marched rapidly for-
^ The left wing of the Indian army
was flanked by the river.
- This passage, as interpreted by
Droysen, Thirlwall, and indeed as
generally understood, intimates that
Alexander ordered Koinos to station
himself opposite the enemy'' s right,
and not on the Macedonian extreme
right. Thus Moberly, who holds the
general view, remarks {Alexander in
the Punjaub^ p. 6i): — "Coenus was
ordered to station himself opposite the
enemy's right ; then, in case of Porus
withdrawing all his cavalry from the
right, in order to meet Alexander's
attack on the left, Coenus was to pass
from one wing to the other, appar-
ently in front of the Macedonian line,
and to attack the Indian cavalry in
the rear as soon as, in advancing to
meet Alexander, they had got some
little distance from their supports.
. . . Distance can be got over quickly
by cavalry." Kochly and Rustow,
however, in their History of the Greek
Military System, advocate a different
view. "Alexander," they say, " must
have sent Koinos to the extreme right
wing with the order, that if the cavalry
broke from the line against himself
(Alexander) he was to fall upon their
rear. Had he been detached to oppose
the right wing of Poros he would have
been too far off to support Alexander's
front attack by an attack on the
enemy's rear." This seems the pre-
ferable view.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
105
ward himself with the companion cavalry against the left
wing of the barbarians, making haste to attack their
cavalry in a state of disorder while they were still in
column, and before they could deploy into line.
Chapter X VII. — Description of the battle of the
Hydaspes — Defeat of Poros
The Indians meanwhile had collected their horsemen
from every quarter, and were riding forward to repulse
Alexander's onset, when Koinos, in accordance with his
orders, appeared with his cavalry upon their rear. See-
ing this the Indians had to make their cavalry face both
to front and rear — the largest and best part to oppose
Alexander, and the remainder to wheel round against
Koinos and his squadrons. This therefore at once threw
their ranks into confusion, and disconcerted their plan
of operations ; and Alexander, seeing that now was his
opportunity while their cavalry was in the very act of
forming to front and rear, fell upon those opposed to him
with such vigour that the Indians, unable to withstand
the charge of his cavalry, broke from their ranks, and fled
for shelter to the elephants as to a friendly wall.^ Upon
this the drivers of the elephants urged these animals for-
ward against the cavalry ; but the Macedonian phalanx
itself now met them face to face, and threw darts at the
men on the elephants, and from one side and the other
struck the elephants themselves as they stood around
^ *' To meet the double assault (of
Alexander and Coenus) they resorted
to one of those changes of front in
which Indian cavalry are often so
surprisingly rapid — facing partly to
the front and partly to the rear. Yet
Alexander was beforehand with them ;
and his renewed charge threw them
into utter confusion before they could
fully assume their new formation.
Flying along the front of their own
infantry, they took refuge in the
spaces left between every two ele-
phants, and (as it would seem in the
absence, from Arrian's account, of the
full details) passed as soon as possible
through the intervals of the foot
regiments, so as to be for the moment
quite outside the battle. As soon as
they were out of the way the Indian
elephants were sent on, supported by
the infantry, but were at once met
face to face by the Macedonian
phalanx." — v. Moberly's Alexander
in the Punjatib, Introd. p. 12.
io6
THE INVASION OF INDIA
them. This kind of warfare was different from any of
which they had experience in former contests, for the
huge beasts charged the ranks of the infantry, and wher-
ever they turned went crushing through the Macedonian
phalanx though in close formation ; while the horsemen
of the Indians, on seeing that the infantry was now
engaged in the action, again wheeled round and charged
the cavalry. But Alexander's men, being far superior
in personal strength and military discipline, again routed
them, and again drove them back upon the elephants, and
cooped them up among them. Meanwhile the whole of
Alexander's cavalry had now been gathered into one
battalion, not in consequence of an order, but from being
thrown together in the course of the struggle, and wher-
ever they fell upon the ranks of the Indians they made
great carnage before parting from them. The elephants
being now cooped up within a narrow space, did no less
damage to their friends than to their foes, trampling them
under their hoofs as they wheeled and pushed about.
There resulted in consequence a great slaughter of the
cavalry, cooped up as it was in a narrow space around
the . elephants. Many of the elephant drivers, moreover,
had been shot down, and of the elephants themselves
some had been wounded, while others, both from ex-
haustion and the loss of their mahouts, no longer kept to
their own side in the conflict, but, as if driven frantic by
their sufferings, attacked friend and foe quite indiscrim-
inately, pushed them, trampled them down, and killed
them in all manner of ways. But the Macedonians, who
had a wide and open field, and could therefore operate as
they thought best, gave way when the elephants charged,
and when they retreated followed at their heels and plied
them with darts ; whereas the Indians, who were in the
midst of the animals, suffered far more the effects of their
rage. When the elephants, however, became quite ex-
hausted, and their attacks were no longer made with
vigour, they fell back like ships backing water, and merely
kept trumpeting as they retreated with their faces to the
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
107
enemy. Then did Alexander surround with his cavalry
the whole of the enemy's line, and signal that the infantry,
with their shields linked together so as to give the utmost
compactness to their ranks, should advance in phalanx.
By this means the cavalry of the Indians was, with a few
exceptions, cut to pieces in the action. Such also was
the fate of the infantry, since the Macedonians were now
pressing upon them from every side. Upon this all
turned to flight wherever a gap could be found in the
cordon of Alexander's cavalry.
Chapter X VII L — Sequel of the battle and surrender
of Poros
Meanwhile Krateros and all the other officers of Alex-
ander's army, who had been left behind on the opposite
bank of the Hydaspes, crossed the river when they per-
ceived that Alexander was winning a splendid victory.
These men, being fresh, were employed in the pursuit,
instead of Alexander's exhausted troops, and they made
no less a slaughter of the Indians in the retreat than had
been made in the engagement.
The loss of the Indians in killed fell little short of
20,000 infantry and 3000 cavalry, and all their chariots
were broken to pieces.^ Two sons of Poros fell in the
battle, and also Spitakes,^ the chief of the Indians of that
district. The drivers of the elephants and of the chariots
were also slain and the cavalry officers and the generals
in the army of Poros all . . ? The elephants, moreover,
that escaped destruction in the field were all captured.
On Alexander's side there fell about 80 of the 6000 in-
fantry who had taken part in the first attack, i o of the
1 Diodoros gives the number of Alexander during the march of the
Indians killed at upwards of 12,000, latter from Taxila to the Hydaspes,
and of the captured at more than as Droysen and Thirlwall agree m
9000, besides 80 elephants. thinking.
2 The Spitakes here mentioned as ^ The hiatus is supposed to have
one of the slain is probably the same contained the number of officers
as Pittacus, who is recorded by Poly- killed.
ainos to have had an encounter with
io8
THE INVASION OF INDIA
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
109
horse archers who first began the action, 20 of the com-
panion cavalry, and 200 of the other cavalry.^
When Poros, who had nobly discharged his duties
throughout the battle, performing the part not only of a
general, but also that of a gallant soldier, saw the slaughter
of his cavalry and some of his elephants lying dead, and
others wandering about sad and sullen without their
drivers, while the greater part of his infantry had been
killed, he did not, after the manner of Darius, the great'^
king, abandon the field and show his men the first ex-
ample of flight, but, on the contrary, fought on as long as
he saw any Indians maintaining the contest in a united
body ; but he wheeled round on being wounded in the
right shoulder, where only he was unprotected by armour
in the battle. All the rest of his person was rendered
shot-proof by his coat of mail, which was remarkable for
its strength and the closeness with which it fitted his
person, as could afterwards be observed by those who saw
him. When he found himself wounded he turned his
elephant round and began to retire. Alexander, perceiv- ,
ing that he was a great man and valiant in fight, was
anxious^ _-^-^--j~.^ ^.^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^.^ purpose sent to him
first of all Taxiles the Indian. Taxiles, who was on
horseback^ approached as near the elephant which carried
Poros as seemed safe, and entreated him, since it was no
longer possible for him to flee, to stop his elephant and
listen to the message he brought from Alexander. But
Poros, on finding that the speaker was his old enemy
Taxiles, turned round and prepared to smite him with
his javelin ; and he would probably have killed him
had not Taxiles instantly put his horse to the gallop
and got beyond the reach of Poros. But not even for
this act did Alexander feel any resentment against Poros,
but sent to him messenger after messenger, and last of all
Heroes, an Indian, as he had learned that Poros and this
L
1/
^ This death-roll evidently greatly
under-estimates the loss on Alexander's
side. Diodoros says that there fell of
the Macedonians 280 cavalry and more
than 700 infantry.
Heroes were old friends. As soon as Poros heard the
message which Heroes now brought just at a time when
he was overpowered by thirst, he made his elephant halt
and dismounted. Then, when he had taken a draught of
water and felt revived, he requested Heroes to conduct
him without delay to Alexander.^
Cliapter XIX. — Alexander makes Poros his firm friend
and ally — Founds two cities — Death of his famous
horse Boukephalas
He was then conducted to Alexander, who, on learn-
ing that Heroes was approaching with him, rode forward
in front of his line with a few of the Companions to meet
him. Then reining in his horse he beheld with admira-
tion the handsome person and majestic stature of Poros,
which somewhat exceeded five cubits. He saw, too,
with wonder that he did not seem to be broken and
abased in spirit, but that he advanced to meet him as a
brave man would meet another brave man after gallantly
contending with another king in defence of his kingdom.
Then Alexander, who was the first to speak requested
Poros to say how he wished to be treated. The report
goes that Poros said in reply, " Treat me, O Alexander !
as befits a king ; " and that Alexander, being pleased with
his answer, replied, " For mine own sake, O Poros ! thou
shalt be so treated, but do thou, in thine own behalf, ask
for whatever boon thou pleasest," to which Poros replied
that in what he had asked everything was included.
Alexander was more delighted than ever with this re-
joinder, and not only appointed Poros to govern his own
Indians, but added to his original territory another of still
greater extent. Alexander thus treated this brave man
1 Poros was the first sovereign that
Alexander had captured on the field
of battle. Curtius and Diodoros re-
late somewhat differently from Arrian
the story of his capture, representing
him to have been protected to the last
by his faithful elephant.
/
no
THE INVASION OF INDIA
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
III
as befitted a king, and he consequently found him in all
respects faithful and devoted to his interests. Such, then,
was the result of the battle in which Alexander fought
against Poros ^ and the Indians of the other side of the
Hydaspes in the month of Mounychion of the year when
Hegemon was archon in Athens.^
Alexander founded two cities, one on the battlefield,
and the other at the point whence he had started to cross
the river Hydaspes. The former he called Nikaia in
honour of his victory over the Indians, and the other
Boukephala^ in memory of his horse Boukephalas, which
died there, not from being wounded by any one, but from
toil and old age, for he was about thirty years old,^ and
had heretofore undergone many toils and dangers along
with Alexander. This Boukephalas was never mounted
by any one except Alexander only, for he disdained all
other riders. He was of an uncommon size and of
generous mettle. He had by way of a distinguishing
mark the head of an ox impressed upon him, and some
say that from this circumstance he got his name. But
others say that though he was black, he had on his fore-
head a white mark which bore a close resemblance to the
brow of an ox. In the country of the Ouxians this horse
disappeared from Alexander, who sent a proclamation
through the land that he would kill all the Ouxians if
1 See Note ^, Battle with Poros. the great camp at Jalalpur. It be-
^ Diodoros says the battle occurred came a great emporium of commerce,
while Chremes was archon at Athens. as we find from the Peripl{ls of the
^ Nikaia most probably occupied the Erythraian Sea, c. 47. In the Peu-
site of the modern town of Mong, near tinger Tables it is called Alexandria
the left bank. Nothing is known of Bucefalos.
its history. With respect to its sister ** " Schmieder says that Alexander
city Bouk^phala, the ancient writers could not have broken in the horse
are not m agreement. Plutarch before he was sixteen years old. But
places it on the left or eastern bank since at this time he was in his twenty-
of the Hydaspes, for he says that ninth year he would have had him
Boukephalas was killed in the battle, thirteen years. Consequently the
and that the city was built where he horse must have been at least seven-
fell and was buried. According, how- teen years old when he acquired
ever, to Strabo, Arrian, and Diodoros, him. Can any one believe this ? Yet
it stood on the west bank ; but while Plutarch also states that the horse
Strabo places it at the point where was thirty years old at his death."
the troops embarked, Arrian places it Chinnock's Anabasis of Alexander^
farther down the stream on the site of p. 296, note 4.
/
they did not bring him his horse, and brought back he
was immediately after the proclamation had been issued ^ —
so great was Alexander's attachment to his favourite, and
so great was the fear of Alexander which prevailed among
the barbarians. Let so much honour be paid by me to
this Boukephalas for Alexander's sake.
Chapter XX. — Alexander conquers the Glaus ai, receives
embassies from Abisaris and other chiefs ^ and crosses
the Akesines
When Alexander had duly honoured with splendid
obsequies those who had been slain in the battle, he
offered to the gods in acknowledgment of his victory the
customary sacrifices, and celebrated athletic and equestrian
contests on the bank of the river Hydaspes, at the place
where he first crossed with his army. He then left
Krateros behind with a part of the army to build and
fortify the cities which he was founding there, while he
advanced himself against the Indians whose country lay
next to the dominions of Poros. Aristoboulos says that
the name of the nation was the Glaukanikoi, but Ptolemy
calls them the Glausai.^ By which of the names it was
called I take to be a matter of no consequence. Alex-
ander invaded their country with the half of the companion
cavalry, picked men from each phalanx of the infantry,
all the horse-archers, the Agrianians, and the other archers.
The people everywhere surrendered on terms of capitula-
1 This incident is referred by Plu- Chenab. The name of the inhabit-
tarch to Hyrkania, and by Curtius to ants, Glausai or Glaukanikoi, has
the land of the Mardians. The been identified by V. de Saint-Martin
Ouxioi lived on the borders of Persis, with that of the Kalaka, a tribe men-
between that province and Sousiana. tioned in the Vardha Sanhita, a work
^ Alexander, according to Dio- of the sixth century of our aera. In
doros, halted to recruit his army for the Mahdbhdrata the name is written
thirty days in the dominions of Poros. Kalaja, and in the Rajput Chronicles
He then advanced northwards with a Kalacha, a form which justifies the
part of his army to the fertile and Greek Glausai. The second part of
populous regions that lay in the south the longer name, anika, means a
of Kas'mir (the Bhimber and Bajaur troop or army in Sanskrit. —z'. Saint-
districts) between the upper courses Martin's Etude, pp. 102, 103.
of the Hydaspes and the Akesines and
•^
X
112
THE INVASION OF INDIA
tion. In this manner he took seven-and-thirty cities, the
smallest of which contained not fewer than 5000 in-
habitants, while many contained upwards of 10,000. He
took also a great many villages which were not less
populous than the towns ; and this country he gave to
Poros to rule,^ and between him and Taxiles he effected a
reconciliation. He then sent Taxiles home to his capital.
At this time envoys came from Abisares to say that
their king surrendered himself and his whole realm to
Alexander.- Yet before the battle in which Alexander
had defeated Poros, Abisares was ready with his army to
fight on the side of Porosr But he now sent his brother
along with the other envoys to Alexander, taking with
them money and forty elephants as a present. Envoys
also arrived from the independent Indians, and from
another Indian ruler called Poros.^ Alexander ordered
Abisares to come to him as quickly as possible, threaten-
ing that if he did not come he would see him and his
army arriving where he would not rejoice to see them.
At this time Phratophernes, the satrap of Parthia and
Hyrkania, at the head of the Thracians who had been
left with him came to Alexander. There came also
envoys from Sisikottos, the satrap of the Assakenians,
reporting that these people had slain their governor and
revolted from Alexander. Against these he sent Philip-
pos and Tyriaspes to quell the insurrection and restore
tranquillity and order to the province.
Alexander himself advanced towards the river Ake-
^ This is the only Indian river of which Ptolemy,
smes.'
1 Conf. Strabo, XV. i. 3. *' Other
writers affirm that the Macedonians
conquered nine nations situated be-
tween the Hydaspes and the Hypanis
(Beas), and obtained possession of
500 cities, not one of which was less
than Kos Meropis, and that Alex-
ander, after having conquered all
this country, delivered it up to
Poros. "
2 This was a second embassy. An
earlier is mentioned in Chapter VIII.
of this book.
3 Strabo (XV. i. p. 699) says this
Poros was a nephew of the Poros
whom Alexander had defeated, and
that his country was called Gandaris.
The Gandarai were a widely extended
people, occupying a district stretching
from the upper part of the Panjabtothe
west of the Indus as far as Qandahar.
They are the Gandhara of Sanskrit.
■* The Akesines, now the Chenab,
is called in the Vedic Hymns the
Asikni^ i.e. " dark-coloured." It was
called also, and more commonly,
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
113
the son of Lagos, has mentioned the size. He states that
where Alexander crossed it with his army in boats and
on inflated hides the current was so rapid that the waters
dashed with foam and fury against the large and jagged
rocks with which the channel was bestrewn. He informs
us also that it was i 5 stadia in breadth ; and while the
passage was easy for those who crossed upon inflated
hides, not a few of those who were carried in boats per-
ished in the waters, as many of the boats were dashed to
pieces by striking against the rocks. From this descrip-
tion we may fairly conclude, if we institute a comparison,
that the size of the river Indus has been pretty correctly
stated by those who take it to have an average breadth of
40 stadia, while, where narrowest and of course deepest,
it contracts to a breadth of i 5 stadia, which I take to be
its actual breadth in many parts of its course, for I con-
clude that Alexander selected a part of the Akesines
where the passage was widest, and where the current
would consequently be slower than elsewhere.
Chapter XXL — Pursuit after Poros, nepliezu of the great
Poros — Conquest of the country between the Akesines
and the Hydraotes — Passage of the latter river
After crossing the river he left Koinos there upon the
bank with his own brigade, and ordered him to superin-
tend the passage of the river by those troops which had
been left behind to collect corn and other supplies from
the part of India which was now under his authority.
Poros he sent home to his capital with orders to select
the best fighting men of the Indians, and to muster all
Chandrabhaga, which, being trans-
literated into Greek, becomes Sandro-
phagos. This word suggested to the
soldiers of Alexander another of bad
omen, Ale-xandrophagoSy which means
devourer of Alexander^ and hence
they adopted its other name, perhaps
on account of the disaster which befell
the Macedonian fleet at the turbulent
junction of this river with the Hydas-
pes. In Ptolemy's Geography it is
called Sandabala by an obvious error
for Sandabaga. The Akesines, though
joined by the other great Panjab
rivers, retained its name until it fell
into the Indus.
114
THE INVASION OF INDIA
the elephants he possessed, and to rejoin him with these.
He resolved to pursue in person the other Poros — the
bad one — with the lightest troops in his army, for word
had been brought that he had fled from the country of
which he was the ruler ; for, while hostilities still sub-
sisted between Alexander and the other Poros, this Poros
had sent envoys to Alexander offering to surrender into
his hands both his person and the country over which he
ruled, but this more from enmity to Pdros than friend-
liness to Alexander. On learning therefore that Poros had
not only been set at liberty, but had his kingdom restored
to him, and that too with a large accession of territory, he
was overcome with fear, not so much of Alexander as of
his namesake Poros, and fled from his country, taking
with him as many fighting men as he could persuade to
accompany him in his flight.
Alexander, while marching to overtake him, arrived at
the Hydraotes — another Indian river, not less in breadth
than the Akesines, but not so rapid.^ Over all the
country which he overran he planted garrisons in the most
suitable places, so that the troops under Krateros and
Koinos might, while scouring it far and near for forage,
traverse it in safety to join him. He then despatched
Hephaistion with a force comprising two divisions of
infantry, his own regiment of cavalry and that of Demetrios,
aind one -half of the archers, into the country of that
Poros who had revolted. He received orders to hand over
the country to the other Poros, and when he had reduced
all the independent Indian tribes bordering on the banks
^ The Hydraotes is called by Strabo
(XV. i. 21 ) the Hyarotis, and in
Ptolemy's Geography the Adris or
Rhouadis. It is now the Rdvi^ which
is an abridged form of its Sanskrit
name, the Airavati. It passes the
city of Lahore, and joins the Chenab
about 30 miles above Multan. In
former times, however, the junction
occurred 15 miles below that city. In
Ptolemy's Geography the Rhouadis is
erroneously made to join the Hydas-
pes, or, as Ptolemy calls it, the
Bidaspes. Arrian in his Indika (c.
4) describes the Hydraotes as rising
in the country of the Kambistholoi,
and after receiving the Hyphasis
among the Astrybai, and the Saranges
from the Kekeans (the Sekaya of
Sanskrit), and the Neudros from the
Attakenoi, falling into the Akesines.
The Hyphasis does not, however, join
the Hydraotes.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT 115
of the Hydraotes, to place these also under the rule of
Poros. He himself then crossed the river Hydraotes,
where he met with none of the difficulties which had
attended the passage of the Akesines. When he was
advancing into the country beyond the Hydraotes he
found most of the natives willing to surrender on capitu-
lation, while some met him in arms, and others were
captured when attempting to escape and reduced to
submission.
Chapter XXIL — Alexander marches against the Kathaians
— Takes Pimprama, and lays siege to Sangala
Alexander meanwhile had learned that the Kathaians ^
and other tribes of independent Indians " were preparing to
meet him in battle if he invaded their country, and were
inviting the neighbouring tribes, which were independent
like themselves, to cooperate with them. He learned also
that the city near which they meant to engage him was
strongly fortified, and was called Sangala.^ The Kathaians
themselves enjoyed the highest reputation for courage
and skill in the art of war, and the same warlike spirit
characterised the Oxydrakai, another Indian race, and
the Malloi, who were also an Indian race, for when
shortly before this time Poros and Abisares had marched
against them with their armies, and had besides stirred
up many of the independent Indians against them, they
were obliged, as it turned out, to retreat without accom-
plishing anything at all adequate to the scale of their
preparations.
Alexander, on receiving this intelligence, marched
rapidly against the Kathaians, and on the second day
after he had left the river Hydraotes arrived at a city
^ V, Note L, Kathaians.
^ The expression independent shows
that the Greeks were cognisant of the
Indian village system. Each of its
rural units they took to be an inde-
pendent republic.
^ V. Note M, Sangala.
ii6
THE INVASION OF INDIA
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
117
named Pimprama, belonging to an Indian race called the
Adraistai/ which surrendered on terms of capitulation.
Alexander gave his troops rest the next day, and on the
third day advanced to Sangala, where the Kathaians and
the neighbouring tribes that had joined them were mus-
tered before the city, and drawn up in battle-order on a
low hill, which was not on all sides precipitous. They
lay encamped behind their waggons, which, by encircling
the hill in three rows, protected the camp with a triple
barricade. Alexander, on perceiving the great number of
the barbarians, and the nature of the position they occu-
pied, drew up his army in the order which seemed best
suited to the circumstances, and at once despatched
against them the horse-archers just as they were, with
orders to ride along and shoot at the Indians from a dis-
tance, so as not only to prevent them from making a
sortie before his own dispositions should be completed,
but to wound them within their stronghold even before
the battle began. Upon his right wing he posted
the corps of horseguards and the cavalry regiment of
Kleitos, next to these the hypaspists, and then the
Agrianians. The left wing he assigned to Perdikkas,
who commanded his own cavalry regiment and the bat-
talions of the footguards. The archers he formed into
two bodies, and placed them upon each wing. While he
was making these dispositions the infantry and cavalry
which formed the rearguard arrived upon the field. This
cavalry he divided in two parts, and led one to each wing,
and with the infantry that had arrived he closed up the
ranks of the phalanx more densely. Then he took the
cavalry which had been drawn up on the right and
advanced against the waggons ranged on the left wing
^ The Adraistai appear to be the
people called in the Feriphh of the
Erythraean Sea, the Aratrioi. Lassen
identifies them with the Aratta of the
Mah&bh&rata. Diodoros calls them
the Adrestai, and Orosius in his History
(iii. 19) the Adrestae. Their capital,
Pimprama, has not as yet been identi-
fied with certainty, but V. de Saint-
Martin suggests that it may be repre-
sented by Bht'ranah, a. place eight
leagues distant from Lahore towards
the south-east. The same author
thinks that the Adrastae are very
probably the Airdvatd or Rdivdtaka
of Sanskrit.
f
of the Indians, where the position seemed easier to
assault, and where the waggons were not so closely
packed together.
Chapter XX II I. — Alexander drives the Kathaians into
Sangala^ which he invests on every side),
But when the Indians, instead of sallying out from
behind their waggons to attack the cavalry as it advanced,
mounted upon them, and began to shoot from the top of
them, Alexander saw that this was not work for cavalry,
and so, having dismounted, he led on foot the phalanx
of infantry against them. The Macedonians found no
difficulty in driving the Indians from the first row of
waggons, but on the other hand the Indians, having
formed in line in front of the second row, were able to
force back their assailants with greater ease, standing as
they did more compactly together, and in a narrower
circle, while the Macedonians had less room in which to
operate against them. At this time they quietly drew
back the waggons of the first row, and through the gaps
each man, as he found an opportunity, assailed the enemy
in an irregular way.^ Yet even from these waggons they
were forcibly driven by the phalanx of infantry, and even
at the third row they no longer held ground, but fled
with all the haste they could into the city and shut them-
selves up within its gates. Alexander that same day
encamped with his infantry around the city, as far at least
as the phalanx enabled him to surround it, for the wall
was of such great extent that his camp did not com-
pletely environ it. Opposite the part where the gap was
left, and where also was a lake not far from the walls, he
posted the cavalry all round the lake, as he knew it not
to be deep, and at the same time anticipated that the
Indians, terrified by their previous defeat, would abandon
^ Chinnock notes that Caesar's manner by the Helvetians. — v,
troops were assailed in a similar Caesar's De Bella Gallico, i. 26.
ii8
THE INVASION OF INDIA
the city during the night. The event showed he had con-
jectured aright, for about the second watch the most of
them dropped down from the wall and came upon the
outposts of the cavalry. The foremost of them were cut
to pieces by the sentinels, but those in the rear, perceiving
that the lake was guarded all round, withdrew into the
city. Alexander now encompassed the city with a double
stockade, except where the lake shut it in, and around
the lake he posted guards to keep still stricter watch. He
resolved also to bring up the military engines against the
place for battering down the walls. Some deserters, how-
ever, came to him from the city and informed him that
the Indians intended that very night to escape from the
city by way of the lake where the gap occurred in the
stockade. So at that point he stationed Ptolemy, the
son of Lagos, with three divisions of the hypaspists, each
looo strong, all the Agrianians, and a single line of
archers, and pointed out to him the particular spot where
the barbarians, as he conjectured, were likeliest to attempt
forcing their passage. " And now," said he, " when thou
perceivest the barbarians forcing their way at this point,
do thou with the army arrest their advance, and order the
trumpets to sound the signal ; and do you, sirs," he added,
turning to the officers, "as soon as the signal is given,
each of you with your men in battle-order, hasten towards
the noise wherever the trumpet summons you. I shall
not myself stand idly by away from the broil."
Chapter XXIV. — Alexander captures Sangala, razes it to
the ground, and advances to the river Hyphasis
Such were the directions he gave, and Ptolemy in that
place collected as many as he could of the waggons which
the enemy had left behind in their first flight, and placed
them athwart so that the fugitives might imagine there
were many obstacles to their escaping by night. He
ordered the stakes, which had been cut but not fixed in
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
119
the ground, to be formed into stockades at different points
between the lake and the wall. All this was done by
the soldiers during the night. But when it was now
about the fourth watch the barbarians, in accordance with
the information Alexander had received, opened the gates
which fronted the lake and rushed towards it at full
speed. They did not, however, escape the vigilance either
of the picquets posted there, or of Ptolemy who lay behind
ready to support them ; and just then the trumpeters
gave him the signal, and he advanced against the barbarians
with his troops which were under arms and drawn up
ready for action. The waggons, moreover, as well as the
stockade, which had been constructed between the wall
and the lake, impeded the fugitives ; and as soon as the
trumpet sounded the alarm Ptolemy with his men fell
upon them and killed them, one after another, as they
slunk out from the waggons. Upon this the Indians fled
back once more to the city for refuge, and as many as
500 of them were slain in the retreat.
Meanwhile P6ros also arrived, bringing with him the
remainder of his elephants and a force of 5000 Indians,
and the military engines which had been constructed by
Alexander were now being brought up to the wall. But
the Macedonians, before any part of it was battered down,
took the city by storm, having undermined the wall,
which was of brick, and planted ladders against it all
round. In the capture 17,000 of the Indians were
slaughtered, and more than 70,000 were captured, together
with 300 waggons and 500 horsemen.^ The loss in
Alexander's army during all the siege was somewhat
under 100 killed, but the proportion of the wounded to
the number killed was higher than usual, for there were
1200 wounded, including some officers, and among these
Lysimachos, a member of the body-guard.
Alexander having buried the dead according to
custom, sent Eumenes, his secretary, in command of 300
^ Curtius gives the loss of the numbers here seem to be greatly
Kathaians at Socxd killed. Arrian's exaggerated.
I20
THE INVASION OF INDIA
horsemen to the two cities which had revolted along with
Sangala, to tell those who held them that Sangala had been
captured, and that Alexander would not at all deal hardly
with them if they remained where they were and received
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
121
/
Fig. 9. — EumenIs.
him in a friendly way, for that none of the independent
Indians who had voluntarily surrendered themselves had
received any ill-treatment at his hands. But they had
already learned that Sangala had been stormed by Alex-
ander, and being terrified by the news had left the cities
and were in flight. When Alexander was informed of
their flight he hastened after them, but as they had a long
start of him most of them baffled his efforts to overtake
them. Those, however, who were left behind in the
retreat when their strength failed were taken by the troops
and slaughtered to the number of about 500. As he
gave up the design of pursuing the fugitives any farther,
he drew back to Sangala and razed the city to the ground!
The land belonging to it he made over to those Indians
who had formerly been independent, but who had volun-
tarily submitted to him. He then sent Poros with his
own forces to the cities which had submitted to introduce
garrisons within them, but he himself with his army
advanced to the river Hyphasis^ to conquer the Indians
^ The Hyphasis, now the Beas or
Beias, is variously called by the
classical writers the Bibasis, the
Hypasis, and the Hypanis. Its Sans-
krit name is the Fzpdsd, which means
*' uncorded," and it is said to have
been so called because it destroyed the
cord with which one of the Indian
sages intended to hang himself. It
joins the Satlej (not the Hydraotes, as
Arrian says in his Indika), and the
united stream is called in Sanskrit the
S'atadru, i.e. ** flowing in a hundred
channels." It marked the limit of
Alexander's advance eastward. In
his time it flowed in a different
r
who dwelt beyond it. Nor did there appear to him any
end of the war as long as an enemy remained to be
encountered.
Chapter XXV. — Alexander finding the army unwilling to
advance beyond the Hyphasis, convokes his officers and
addresses them on the subject
It was reported that the country beyond the Hyphasis
was exceedingly fertile, and that the inhabitants were
good agriculturists, brave in war, and living under an
excellent system of internal government ; for the multitude
was governed by the aristocracy, who exercised their
authority with justice and moderation. It was also
reported that the people there had a greater number of
elephants than the other Indians, and that those were
of superior size and courage. This information only
whetted Alexander's eagerness to advance farther, but
the Macedonians now began to lose heart when they
saw the king raising up without end toils upon toils and
dangers upon dangers. The army, therefore, began to
hold conferences at which the more moderate men be-
wailed their condition, while others positively asserted
that they would follow no farther though Alexander him-
self should lead the way. When this came to Alexander's
knowledge he convoked the officers in command of
brigades, before the disorder and despondency should
channel, one by which it reached the
Chenab about 40 miles above Uchh.
Curtius and Diodoros inform us that
Alexander before reaching this river
had entered the dominions of King
Sophites, who submitted without re-
sistance, and was therefore left in
possession of his sovereignty. Another
chief (called Phegeus by Diodoros,
but more correctly Phegelas by Cur-
tius), whose dominions adjoined the
Hyphasis, entertained Alexander and
his army for two days. By this time
he had been rejoined by Hephaistion,
who had been conducting operations
elsewhere, and he then proceeded to
the bank of the river. The country
beyond it Arrian represents as exceed-
ingly fertile, whereas in Curtius and
Diodoros we read how Alexander was
informed that a desert lay beyond it
which would occupy a journey of
eleven days. Arrian 's statement holds
true of the northern districts beyond
the river, and the other statement of
the southern districts. Thirlwall,
following the latter statement, takes
it that Alexander reached the Satlej
after it had received the Hyphasis,
but this is a very questionable view.
K
122
THE INVASION OF INDIA
be further developed among the soldiers, and he thus
addressed them :
" On seeing that you, O Macedonians and allies ! no
longer follow me into dangers with your wonted alacrity,
I have summoned you to this assembly that I may either
persuade you to go farther, or be persuaded by you to
turn back. If you have reason to complain of past
labours, and of me your leader, I need say no more. But
if by those labours you have acquired Ionia,i and the
Hellespont with the two Phrygias, Kappadokia, Paphla-
gonia, Lydia, Karia, Lykia, and Pamphylia, as well as
Phoenikia and Egypt, together with Hellenic Lybia, part
of Arabia, Hollow Syria, Mesopotamia, Babylon, Sousiana,
Persis, and Media, and all the provinces governed by the
Medes and Persians, not to mention other states which
were never subject to them; if in addition we have
conquered the regions beyond the Kaspian Gates, those
beyond Kaukasos, the Tanais - also, and the country
beyond, Baktria, Hyrkania, and the Hyrkanian Sea; if
we have driven the Skythians back into their deserts, and
if besides, the Indus, Hydaspes, Akesines, and Hydraotes
flow through territories that are ours, why should you
hesitate to pass the Hyphasis also and add the tribes
beyond it to your Macedonian conquests? Are you
afraid there are other barbarians who may yet successfully
resist you, although of those we have already met some
have willingly submitted, others have been captured in
flight, while others have left us their deserted country to
be distributed either to our allies or to those who have
voluntarily submitted to us."
^ The name of Ion, the eponymous
ancestor of the lonians, had origin-
ally the digamma, and hence was
written as Ivon. The Hebrew trans-
cription of this digammated form is
lavan, the name by which Greece is
designated in the Bible. The Sans-
krit transcription is Yavana, the name
applied in Indian works to lonians or
Greeks and foreigners generally.
- The Tanais is properly the Don,
but Alexander meant by it the Jax-
artes, which formed the eastern
boundary of the Persian empire, and
which he had crossed to attack the
nomadic Skythians, who had made
threatening demonstrations against
him on the right or northern bank {v.
the 1 6th and 17th chapters of the
fourth book).
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
123
Chapter XXVL — Continuation of Alexander s Speech
" For my part, I think that to a man of spirit there
is no other aim and end of his labours except the labours
themselves, provided they be such as lead him to the
performance of glorious deeds. But ii any one wishes
to know the limits of the present warfare, let him under-
stand that the river Ganges and the Eastern Sea are now
at no great distance off. This sea, I am confident, is
connected with the Hyrkanian Sea, because the Great Ocean
flows round the whole earth.i I shall besides prove to
the Macedonians and their allies that the Indian Gulf
is connected with the Persian, and the Hyrkanian Sea
with the Indian Gulf From the Persian Gulf our fleet
will sail round to Lybia as far as the Pillars of Herakles.2
From these pillars all the interior of Lybia becomes ours,
and thus all Asia shall belong to us,^ and the boundaries
of our empire in that direction will coincide with those
which the deity has made the boundaries of the earth.
^ It was a prevalent belief in
antiquity that the Kaspian or Hyr-
kanian Sea was a gulf of the great
ocean which encircles the earth, and
not an inland sea.
2 Arrian (vii. i) says: "When
Alexander reached Pasargadai and
Persepolis he conceived an ardent
desire to sail down the Euphrates and
Tigres to the Persian sea, and survey
their mouths. . . . Some writers have
stated that he had in contemplation a
voyage round the greater portion of
Arabia, the land of the Aethiopians,
Lybia, and Numidia beyond Mount
Atlas to Gadeira (Cadiz) inward into
the Mediterranean." One of the
writers referred to is Plutarch, who
says {Alexander^ c. 68): " Nearchos
joined him (Alexander) here (at the
capital of Gedrosia), and he was so
niuch delighted with the account of
his voyage that he formed a design to
sail in person from the Euphrates with
a great fleet, circle the coast of Arabia
and Africa, and enter the Mediter-
ranean by the Pillars of Hercules. "
Herodotos (iv. 42) says that Neko,
king of the Egyptians, sent certain
Phoenicians in ships with orders to
sail back through the Pillars of
Hercules into the Northern Sea (the
Mediterranean that is), and so to
return to Egypt. The pillars de-
signated the twin rocks which guard
the entrance to the Mediterranean at
the eastern extremity of the Straits of
Gibraltar, the one on the European
side being called Kalpe, and that on
the African side, where now stands
the citadel of Ceuta, Abila or Abyla.
V. Pliny (iii. prooem.): " Proximis
autem faucibus utrimque impositi
montes coercent claustra, Abyla
Africae, Europae Calpe, laborum
Herculis metae, quam ob causam in-
digenae columnas ejus dei vocant."
^ Arrian (iii. 30) informs us that
in the opinion of some the Nile formed
the boundary of Asia, but he writes
here as if Lybia or Northern Africa
were part of Asia.
124
THE INVASION OF INDIA
But, if we now turn back, many warlike nations extending
beyond the Hyphasis to the Eastern Sea, and many others
lying northwards between these and Hyrkania, to say
nothing of their neighbours the Skythian tribes, will be
left behind us unconquered, so that if we turn back
there is cause to fear lest the conquered nations, as
yet wavering in their fidelity, may be instigated to revolt
by those who are still independent. Our many labours
will in that case be all completely thrown away, or we
must enter on a new round of toils and dangers. But
persevere, O Macedonians and allies! glory crowns the
deeds of those who expose themselves to toils and
dangers. Life, signalised by deeds of valour, is delight-
ful, and so is death, if we leave behind us an immortal
name. Know ye not that it was not by staying at home
in Tiryns ^ or Argos, or even in Peloponnesos or Thebes,
that our ancestor was exalted to such glory, that from
being a man he became, or was thought to be, a god.
Nor were the labours few even of Dionysos, who ranks
as a god far above Herakles. But we have advanced
beyond Nysa, and the rock Aornos, which proved impreg-
nable to Herakles, is in our possession. Add, then, the
rest of Asia to our present acquisitions — the smaller part
of it to the greater. Could we ourselves, think you, have
achieved any great and memorable deeds if, sitting down
at home in Macedonia, we had been content without
exertion merely to preserve our own country, by repelling
the attacks of the neighbouring Thracians, Illyrians, and
Triballians, or those Greeks whose disposition to us is
unfriendly ?
" If, indeed, while leading you, I had myself shrunk from
the toils and dangers to which you were exposed, you
would not without good reason be dispirited in prospect
of undertaking fresh enterprises, seeing that while you
alone shared the toils, it was for others you procured
^ The Macedonian kings claimed
to be descended from Herakles, who
resided for some time at Tiryns, one
of the most ancient cities in Greece,
situated near Argos, and, like Argos,
famous for its Cyclopean walls.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
125
the rewards. But our labours are in common ; I, equally
with you, share in the dangers, and the rewards become
the public property. For the land is yours, and you
are its satraps ; and among you the greater part of its
treasures has already been distributed. And when all
Asia is subdued then, by heaven, I will not merely satisfy,
but exceed every man's hopes and wishes. Such of you
as wish to return home I shall send back to your own
country, or even myself will lead you back. But those
who remain here I will make objects of envy to those
who go back."
Chapter XX VI I. — Koinos, replying to Alexander, states
the grievances of the arjny
When Alexander had spoken to this and the like
effect, a long silence followed, because those present neither
dared to speak freely in opposition to the king, nor yet
wished to assent to what he proposed. Alexander again
and again requested that any one who wished should
speak, even if his views differed from those which he
had himself expressed. But the silence was unbroken
for a long time, till at last Koinos, the son of Polemokrates,
summoned up courage and spoke to this effect :
"Forasmuch as you do not wish, O king! to rule
Macedonians by constraint, but say that you will lead
them by persuasion, or suffering yourself to be persuaded
by them, will not have recourse to compulsion, I intend
to speak, not on behalf of myself and fellow-officers who
have been honoured above the other soldiers, and have
most of us received splendid rewards of our labours,
and from having been highly exalted above others are
more zealous than others to serve you in all things, but
in behalf of the great body of the army. Yet on behalf
of this army I intend not to say what may be agreeable
to the men, but what I think will be conducive to your
present interests and safest for the future. I feel bound
l/Y
126
THE IxWASION OF INDIA
by my age not to conceal what appears to be the best
course to follow ; bound by the high authority conferred
on me by yourself, and bound also by the unhesitating
boldness which I have hitherto exhibited in all enterprises
of danger. The more I look to the number and magni-
tude of the exploits performed under your command by
us who set out with you from home, the more does it
seem to me expedient to place some limit to our toils
and dangers. For you see yourself how many Macedonians
and Greeks started with you, and how few of us are left.
From our ranks you sent away home from Baktra the
Thessalians ^ as soon as you saw they had no stomach
for further toils, and in this you acted wisely. Of the
other Greeks, some have been settled in the cities founded
by you, where all of them are not willing residents;
others still share our toils and dangers. They and the
Macedonian army have lost some of their numbers in
the fields of battle ; others have been disabled by wounds ;
others have been left behind in different parts of Asia,'
but the majority have perished by disease. A few only
out of many survive, and these few possessed no longer
of the same bodily strength as before, while their spirits
are still more depressed.^ All those, whose parents are
still living, have a yearning to see them— a yearning
to see their wives and children— a yearning to see were
it but their native land itself— a desire pardonable in
men who would return home in great splendour derived
from your munificence, and raised from humble to high
rank, and from indigence to wealth. Seek not, therefore,
to lead them against their inclinations, for you will not
find them the same men in the face of dangers, if they
enter without heart into their contests with the enemy.
* "Alexander," says Arrian (iii.
19), **on reaching Ekbatana, sent
back to the sea the Thessalian cavalry
and the other Grecian allies, paying
them the full amount of the stipulated
hire, and giving them besides a dona-
tive of 2CXXD talents." Was Baktra a
slip of memory on the part of Koinos ?
* The drenching rains to which
the Macedonian soldiers were con-
tinually exposed during their march
from Taxila to the Hyphasis must
have had a considerable effect in ex-
hausting their strength and depressing
their spirits.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT 127
But do you also, if it agree with your wishes, return
home with us, see your mother once more, settle the
affairs of the Greeks, and carry to the house of your
fathers those your great and numerous victories. Then
having so done, form, if you so wish, a fresh expedition
against these same tribes of eastern Indians, or, if you
prefer, against the shores of the Euxine Sea, or against
Karchedon,^ and the parts of Lybia beyond the Karche-
donians. It will then be your part to unfold your
purpose, and then other Macedonians and other Greeks
will follow you — young men full of vigour instead of old
men worn out with toils — men for whom war, through
their inexperience of it, has no immediate terrors, and
eager to set out from the hope of future rewards. They
will also naturally follow you with the greater alacrity,
from seeing that the companions of your former toils
and dangers have returned home wealthy instead of
poor, and raised to high distinction from their original
obscurity. Moderation, in the midst of success, is, O
king ! the noblest of virtues, for though, at the head of
so brave an army, you have nothing to dread from mortal
foes, yet the visitations of the deity cannot be foreseen,
and man cannot, therefore, guard against them."
Chapter XX VIII. — Alexander mortified by the refusal of his
army to advance, secludes himself in his tent, but in
the end resolves to return
When Koinos had concluded his address, those present
are said to have signified their approval of what he said
by loud applause, while many by their streaming tears
showed still more expressively their aversion to encounter
further dangers, and how welcome to them was the idea
of returning. But Alexander, who resented the freedom
^ Karchedon is Carthage. The
name is said to be a corruption of
Kereth-Hadeshoth or Carth-hadtha,
i.e. "new city," in contra-distinction
to Utica, which either signifies in
Phoenician "old city," or is derived,
as Olshausen, thinks, from a root
signifying "a colony."
128
THE INVASION OF INDIA
with which Koinos had spoken, and the hesitation displayed
by the other generals, broke up the conference ; but next
day while his wrath was still hot he summoned the same
men again, and told them that he was going forward him-
self, but would not force any of the Macedonians to
accompany him against their wishes, for he would find
men ready to follow their king of their own free will.
But those who wished to go away were free to go home,
and might tell their friends there that they had returned'
and left their king in the midst of his enemies. It is said
that with these words he withdrew into his tent, and did
not admit any of his companions to see him on that day,
nor even till the third day after, waiting to see whether a
change of mood, such as often takes place in an assemblage
of soldiers, would manifest itself among the Macedonians
and the allies, and make them readier to yield to his
persuasions. But when a deep silence again reigned
throughout the camp, and the soldiers were evidently
offended by his wrath without their minds being changed
by it, he began none the less, as Ptolemy, the son of Lagos,
states, to offer there sacrifice for the passage of the river \
but when on sacrificing he found the omens were against
him, he then assembled the oldest of the Companions, and
especially his intimate friends among them, and as every-
thing indicated that to return was his most expedient
course he intimated to the army that he had resolved to
march back.
Chapter XXIX. — Alexander erects altars on the banks of the
Hyphasis to mark the limits of his advance, recrosses
the Hydraotes and Akesines and regains the Hydaspes
Then they shouted, as a mixed multitude would shout
when rejoicing, and many of them shed tears. Some of
them even approached the royal pavilion, and invoked
many blessings on Alexander, because by them and them
only did he permit himself to be vanquished. He then
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
129
divided the army into brigades, which he ordered to ^
prepare twelve altars ^ to equal in height the highest
military towers, and to exceed them in point of breadth, to
serve as thankofferings to the gods who had led him' so
far as a conqueror, and also as a memorial of his own
labours. When the altars had been constructed, he offered
sacrifice upon them with the customary rites, and cele-
brated a gymnastic and equestrian contest. Having
thereafter committed all the country west of the river
Hyphasis to the government of Poros, he marched back
to the Hydraotes. After crossing this river, he retraced
his steps to the Akesines, and on arriving there found
the city which he had ordered Hephaistion to fortify
completely built.2 Herein he settled as many of the in-
habitants of the neighbourhood as were willing to make
it their domicile, and such also of the mercenary soldiers
as were now unfit for further service. He then began
to make preparations for the downward voyage to the
Great Sea.
At this time Arsakes,^ ruler of the country adjoining
the^ dominions of Abisares, together with the brother of
Abisares and his other relatives, came to him, bringing
presents such as the Indians consider the most valuable,
and some thirty elephants sent by Abisares. They re-
presented that Abisares was prevented from coming in
person by illness — a statement which the ambassadors
sent by Alexander to Abisares corroborated. Alexander,
readily believing that such was the case, made Abisares
satrap of his own dominions, and moreover placed Arsakes
under his jurisdiction. Having then fixed the amount which /^
was to be paid as tribute, he again offered sacrifice near
^ See Note N, Alexander's altars
on the Hyphasis.
^ "This city," says Lassen, "lay
probably where Wazirabad now
stands. Here the great road to the
Hydaspes parts into two, one leading
to Jalalpur, and the other to Jhelam.
It is the sixth of the Alexandreias
mentioned in Stephanos Byz." v.
hid. Alt. ii. 165, n. The Chenab
here has a width of about a mile and
a half.
^ Arsakes, to judge from his name
and what is here said of him, was
probably the king of Uras'a. This
district, the Arsa of Ptolemy, the
W-la-shi of Hwen Thsiang, and now
Rash in Dantawar, included all the
hill country between the Indus and
Kas'mir as far south as Attak.
&^f
K
I30
THE INVASION OF INDIA
the river Akesines. He then recrossed that river, and
reached the Hydaspcs where he employed his army in
repairing the damage caused by the rains to the cities of
Nikaia and Boukephala, and set the other affairs of the
country in order.
Sixth Book
Chapter I. — Alexafider mistakes the Indus for the upper
Nile — Prepares to sail down stream to the sea
When Alexander had got ready upon the banks of the
Hydaspes a large number of thirty-oared galleys, and
others of one bank and a half of oars, besides numerous
horse transports and every other requisite for the easy
conveyance of an army by river, he resolved to sail down
the Hydaspes ^ to the Great Sea. As he had before this
seen crocodiles in the river Indus, and in no other river
but the Nile only, and had besides seen beans of the same
species as those which Egypt produces ^ growing near the
banks of the Akesines, and as he had heard that this river
falls into the Indus, he was led to think that he had dis-
covered the sources of the Nile. His idea was that this
river rose somewhere among the Indians and pursued its
course through a vast tract of desert country, where it lost
^ V. Strabo (XV. i. 29). Between
the Hydaspes and Akesines ... is
the forest in the neighbourhood of the
Emodoi mountains, in which Alex-
ander cut down a large quantity of
fir, pine, cedar, and a variety of other
trees fit for shipbuilding, and brought
the timber down the Hydaspes. With
this he constructed a fleet on the
Hydaspes near the cities which he
built on each side of the river where
he had crossed it and conquered
Poros. "The timber," says Sir A.
Burnes, " of which the boats of the
Panjab are constructed is chiefly
floated down by the Hydaspes from
the Indian Caucasus, which most
satisfactorily explains the selection of
its banks by Alexander in preference
to the other rivers." Bunbury, citing
this passage, adds : " The navigation
of the Indus itself for a considerable
part of its course below Attock is so
dangerous on account of rapids as to
render it wholly unsuitable for the
descent of a flotilla such as that of
Alexander."
- This is the nelumlmm speciostim^
or Cyathus Smithii, the sacred
Egyptian or Pythagorean bean. The
use of its fruit was forbidden to the
Egyptian priests (e-. Herod, ii. 37).
I3»
THE INVASION OF INDIA
the name of the Indus, and that from the time when it
began to flow through the inhabited parts of the world it
was called the Nile both by the Aithiopians, who lived
there and by the Egyptians, just as Homer also changed
its name, calh'ng it the river Egypt after Egypt, the
country where at last it discharges itself into the Inner
Sea.i Accordingly when he was writing to his mother
Olympias about the country of the Indians, he mentioned,
it is said, among other things that he thought he had dis-
covered the sources of the Nile, actually basing on such
\slight and comtemptible evidence his judgements respect-
ing questions of so much importance. When, however,
he investigated with special care the facts relating to the
river Indus, he ascertained from the natives that the
Hydaspes unites with the Akesines, and the Akesines with
the Indus, to which the other two rivers lose both their
waters and their names. He learned further that the
Indus discharges itself into the Great Sea by two mouths,
and that it has no connection with the Egyptian country!
He is said to have then deleted what he had written
about the Nile in the letter to his mother, and as he had
set his mind on sailing down the rivers to the Great Sea
he ordered a fleet for this purpose to be prepared for him.
Adequate crews for the vessels were supplied by the
Phoenicians, Cyprians, Karians, and Egyptians who ac-
companied the army.
^ " It is remarkable to see how in
this respect the geographical informa-
tion of the Greeks seems to have
retrograded since the time of Hero-
dotus. No allusion is found to the
voyage of Scylax related by that
historian, while the just conclusions
derived from it by Herodotus had
fallen into the same oblivion. But
absurd as was this identification (of
the Indus with the Nile), the general
resemblance between these rivers,
which are constantly brought into
comparison by the Greek geographers
(Strabo, XV. p. 692, etc. ), is certainly
such as to justify their observations.
The resemblance of the lower valley
of the Indus from the time it has
received the waters of the Panjab
with Egypt is dwelt upon l)y modern
travellers. One description (says
Mr. Elphinstone) might serve for
both. A smooth and fertile plain is
bounded on one side by mountains,
and on the other by a desert. It is
divided by a large river, which forms
a Delta as it approaches the sea, and
annually inundates and enriches the
country near its banks. The climate
of both is hot and dry, and rain is of
rare occurrence in either country."
V. Bunbury's Hts^. of Anc. Geo. p.
510.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
^ZZ
/
Chapter 11. — Description of tJie voyage down the Hydaspes
At this time Koinos, who was one of Alexander's most
faithful companions, took ill and died, and his master buried
him with all the magnificence circumstances allowed. He
then assembled the Companions and all the ambassadors
of the Indians who had come to him, and in their presence
appointed Poros king of all the Indian territories already
subjugated — seven nations in all, containing more than
2000 cities. He then made the following distribution of
his army. He took in the ships along with himself all
the hypaspists, and the archers, and the Agrianians, and
the corps of horse-guards.^ Krateros commanding a
division of the infantry and cavalry, conducted it along
the right bank of the Hydaspes, while Hephaistion on the
opposite bank advanced in command of the largest and
best division of the army, to which the elephants, now
about 200 in number, were attached. These generals
were instructed to march with all possible speed to where
the palace of Sopeithes 2 was situated. Philippos, the
^ Arrian in the 19th chapter of
the Indika states that the number of
men conveyed in the fleet was 8000,
and that the whole strength of his
army was 120,000 soldiers, including
those whom he brought from the
shores of the Mediterranean, as well
as recruits drawn from various bar-
barous tribes armed in their own
fashion. In the preceding chapter
he gives a list of the great officers
whom Alexander appointed to be
in temporary command of the triremes.
Of these, thirty-three in number,
twenty-four were Macedonians, eight
were Greeks, and one a Persian.
Seleukos is the only officer of note
whose name does not appear in this
list.
2 Diodoros and Curtius, as has
been pointed out (in Note M), place
the dominions of Sopeithes between
the upper Hydraotesand the Hyphasis,
but here we find them transferred
to a more western position. Strabo
was unable to decide where they lay.
* ' Some writers (he says) place Kathaia
and the country of Sopeithes, one of
the rnonarchs, in the tract between
the rivers (Hydaspes and Akesines) ;
some on the other side of the Akes-
ines and of the Hyarotis, on the con-
fines of the territory of the other
Poros, the nephew of Poros who was
taken prisoner by Alexander, and
call the country subject to him Gan-
daris. ... It is said that in the
territory of Sopeithes there is a moun-
tain composed of fossil salt sufficient
for the whole of India. Valuable
mines, also, both of gold and silver,
are situated, it is said, not far off
among other mountains, according to
the testimony of Gorgos the miner."
Strabo then describes (as do also
Diodoros and Curtius) the fight be-
tween a lion and four dogs which
Sopeithes exhibited to Alexander.
To account for the discrepancy in
these statements one is almost tempted
134
THE INVASION OF INDIA
satrap of the province lying west of the Indus in the
direction of the Baktrians, received orders to follow them
with his troops after an interval of three days, but the
cavalry of the Nysaians he now sent back to Nysa. The
command of the whole naval squadron was entrusted to
Nearchos, while the pilot of Alexander's own ship was
Onesikritos, who, in the narrative which he composed
about the wars of Alexander, among his other lies,
described himself as the commander of the fleet, although
he was in reality only a pilot. According to Ptolemy, the
son of Lagos, whose authority I principally follow,' the
ships numbered collectively eighty thirty-oared galleys,
but the whole fleet, including the horse-transports and
the small craft and other river boats consisting of those
that formerly plied on the rivers and those recently built
for the present service, did not fall much short of 2000.1
Chapter II L— Description of the voyage down the HydaspCs
continued
When all the preparations had been completed, the
army at break of day began to embark. Alexander him-
to believe that as there were two
princes of the name of Poros, each
ruling dominions of his own, so there
were also two chiefs of the name of
Sopeithes or (as Curtius more correctly
transcribes it) Sophytes. General
Cunningham would identify Gandaris
with the present district of Gimdid-
b&r or Gundnrbdr, and fixes the
capital of Sophytes on the western
bank of the Hydaspes at Old Bhira,
a place near Ahmedabad, with a very
extensive mound of ruins, and distant
from Nikaia (now Mong) three days
by water. His rule must have ex-
tended westward to the Indus, since
the mountain of rock-salt which Strabo
mcludes in his territory can only refer
to the salt range (the Mount Oromenus
of Phny, xxxi. 39) which extends
hom the Indus to the Hydaspes.
The transcription of the name Sdphytes
will be found discussed elsewhere.
^ Arrian in his Indika, where he
apparently follows Nearchos instead
of Ptolemy as here, gives the whole
number of ships at only 8cxD, includ-
ing both ships of war and transports.
Schmieder and some other editors
would correct this to 1800, but it
seems more probable, Bunbury thinks,
that the basis of the two calculations
vyas different. Ptolemy, he says, dis-
tinctly includes the ordinary river
boats which would doubtless have
l)een collected in large numbers to
assist in transporting so great an army
and its supplies ; while the terms of
Nearchos would seem to imply only
ships of war or regular transports.
Kriiger would correct the 2000 of
the text to 1000, which is the number
of the vessels as given by Diodoros
and Curtius. The fleet began the
downward voyage at the end of
October 326 B.C.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
135
self sacrificed according to custom both to the gods and
to the river Akesines as the seers directed. After he had
embarked he poured a libation into the river, from his
station on the prow, out of a golden bowl, and invoked
not only the Hydaspes, but also the Akesines, as he had
learned that the Akesines was the greatest of all the
confluents of the Hydaspes, and that their point of junction
was not far off. He invoked likewise the Indus, into
which the Akesines falls after receiving the Hydaspes.
He further poured out libations to his ancestor Herakles,
and to Ammon ^ and every other god to whom it was his
custom to sacrifice, and then he ordered the signal for
starting on the voyage to be given by sound of trumpet.
The fleet as soon as the signal sounded began the voyage
in due order, for directions had been given at what dis-
tances the luggage-boats, the horse-transports, and the
war-galleys should keep apart from each other to prevent
collisions which would be inevitable if the ships sailed at
random down the channel. Even the fast sailers were
not allowed to break rank by out-distancing the others.
The noise caused by the rowing was great beyond all
precedent, proceeding as it did from a vast number of
boats being rowed simultaneously, and swelled by the
shouts of the officers directing the rowing to begin or to
stop, commingled with the shouts of the rowers, which rung
like the war-cry when they joined together in keeping
time to the dashing of the oars. The banks, moreover,
being in many places higher than the ships, and compres-
sing the sound within a narrow compass, sent the echoes,
greatly increased by the compression itself, flying to and
fro between them. The ravines also which occasionally
opened on the river on either of its shores served further
to swell the din by reverberating amid their solitudes the
^ Alexander deduced his pedigree
from Ammon, just as the legend
traced the pedigree of Herakles and
Perseus to Zeus. He accordingly
made an expedition to the oasis in the
Libyan desert where Ammon had his
oracle for the purpose of more certainly
learning his origin. His mother,
Olympias, according to Plutarch,
used to complain that Alexander was
for ever embroiling her with Juno.
136
THE INVASION OF INDIA
thuds of the oars. The appearance of the war-horses on
the decks of the transports struck the barbarians, who saw
them through the lattice work, with such wonder and
astonishment, that the throng which lined the shores to
witness the departure of the fleet accompanied it to a
great distance, for in the country of the Indians horses
had never before been seen on shipboard, nor was there
any tradition to the effect that the Indian expedition of
Dionysos was of a naval character. Those Indians also
who had already submitted to Alexander, as soon as they
heard the shouts of the rowers and the dashing of the
oars, ran down to the edge of the river and followed the
fleet, singing their wild native chaunts, for the Indians have
been peculiarly distinguished among the nations as lovers
of dance and song, ever since Dionysos and his attendant
Bacchanals made their festive progress through the realms
of India.^
Chapter IV. — Alexander accelerates his voyage to frustrate
the plans of the Malloi and Oxydrakai, and reaches
tlie turbulent confluence of the Hydaspcs and Akesincs
Alexander sailing thus,^ halted on the third day at the
place where he had ordered Hephaistion and Krateros to
pitch their camps right opposite each other, each on his
own side of the river.^ Having waited here for two days
until Phihppos arrived with the rest of the army, he sent
that general forward with the detachment he had brought
with him to the river Akesines, with orders to continue
his march along the banks of that river. He also sent
Krateros and Hephaistion off again with instructions how
they were to conduct the march. He himself continued
The Indians (says Arrian in
his Indika, c. 7) worship the other
gods, and especially Dionysos, with
cymbals and drums, which he had
taught them to use. He taught them
also the Satyric dance, called by the
Greeks Kordax.
See Note O, Voyage down the
Hydaspes and Akesines to the Indus.
^ This halting-place was at Bhira
or Bheda, if Cunningham is right in
fixing the capital of Sophytes in its
neighbourhood.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT 137
his voyage down the river Hydaspes, which was found
throughout the passage to be nowhere less than twenty
stadia in breadth. Mooring his boats wherever he could
on the banks, he subjected the Indians who lived near
the Hydaspes to his authority, some having surrendered
on terms of capitulation, and such as resorted to arms,
having been subdued by force. He then sailed rapidly
to the country of the Malloi and Oxydrakai, because
he had ascertained that they were the most numerous and
warlike of all the Indian tribes in those parts, and news
had reached him that they had conveyed their children,
and their wives for safety into their strongest cities,'
and that they meant themselves to give him a hostile
reception. He in consequence prosecuted the voyage
with still greater speed, so that he might attack them
before they had settled their plans, and while their pre-
parations were still incomplete and they were in a state
of confusion and alarm. On the fifth day after he had
started from the place where he had halted, and been
joined by Krateros and Hephaistion, he reached the junc-
tion of the Hydaspes and Akesines. Where these rivers
unite the one river formed from them is very narrow, and
not only is the current swift from the narrowness of the
channel, but the waters whirl round in monstrous eddies,
curl up in great billows, and dash so violently that the
roar of the surge is distinctly heard by those who are
still a great distance off. All this had been previously
reported by the natives to Alexander, and he had repeated
the information to the soldiers ; but, notwithstanding, when
the army in approaching the confluence caught the roar
of the stream, the sailors simultaneously suspended the
action of the oars, not at any order from the boatswains,
who had become mute from astonishment, but because
they were stunned with terror by the thundering noise.^
^ Diodoros carelessly represents
these rapids as occurring at the con-
fluence of the two rivers with the
Indus. The dangers of their naviga-
tion seem to have been exaggerated
by the ancient writers, though their
accounts have some foundation in
fact. Sir A. Burnes, the first Euro-
pean known to have visited the spot,
says there are no eddies and no rocks,
138
THE INVASION OF INDIA
Chapter V.— Dangers encountered by the fleet at the con-
fliience—Plan of the operations which followed—
Voyage doivn tJie Akesifies
When they were not far from the meeting of the rivers,
the pilots enjoined the rowers to put all their strength to
the oars to clear the rapids, so that the vessels might not
be caught and capsized in the eddies, but by the exertions
of the rowers might overcome the whirling of the waters.
The merchant vessels accordingly, if they happened to be
whirled round by the current, suffered no damage from
the eddy, beyond the alarm caused to the men on board,
for these vessels, being of a round form, were kept upright
by the current itself, and settled into the proper course.
But the ships of war did not escape so unscathed from the
eddying stream, for, owing to their length, they were not
upheaved in the same way as the others on the seething
surges, and if they had two banks of oars, the lower oars
were not raised much above the level of the water. When
the broad sides, therefore, of these vessels were exposed
to the eddying current, their oars, if not lifted in proper
time, were caught by the water and the blades snapped
asunder. Many of the ships were thus damaged, and two
which fell foul of each other sunk with the greater part of
their crews. But when the river began to widen out, the
current was no longer so rapid and dangerous, and' the
impetuosity of the eddies diminished. Alexander there-
fore brought his fleet to moorings on the right bank where
there was a protection from the strength of the current
and a roadstead for the ships. Here was also a headland
projecting into the river which afforded facilities for col-
lecting the wrecks and whatever living freight they brought.
nor IS the channel confined, while
the ancient character is only sup-
ported by the noise of the confluence,
which is greater than that of any of
the other rivers. The boatmen of
the locality, however, still regard the
passage as a perilous one during the
season when the river is swollen (v.
Travels, i. p. 109). Thirlwall thinks
the principal obstructions have been
worn away. According to Curtius,
Alexander's own ship was here in
imminent danger of being wrecked.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT 139
He saved the survivors ; and when he had repaired the
damaged craft, ordered Nearchos to sail downward till he
reached the confines of the nation called the Malloi. He
made himself an inroad into the territories of the bar-
barians who refused their submission,^ and prevented them
sending succours to the Malloi. He- then rejoined the
fleet.
Hcphaistion, Krateros, and Philippos had there already
united their forces. He then transported to the other side
of the river Hydaspes the elephants, the brigade of Poly-
sperchon, the archers, and Philippos with the troops under
his command, and appointed Krateros to conduct this
expedition. Nearchos he despatched in command of the
fleet, and instructed him to start on the voyage three days
before the departure of the army. The rest of his forces
he divided into three parts. Hephaistion was directed to
set out five days in advance, so that if any of the enemy
fled forward before the division commanded by the king
in person they might be captured, when endeavouring to
escape in that direction, by falling into Hephaistion's
hands. He gave also a part of the army to Ptolemy, the
son of Lagos, with orders to follow him three days later,
so that such of the enemy as fled backward from his own
troops might fall into the hands of those under Ptolemy.^
The detachment that marched in advance he ordered to
wait until he himself should come up at the confluence of
the Akesines and Hydraotes,^ where Krateros and Ptolemy
had orders to join him with their divisions.
^ These barbarians were probably
the Sibi {v. Diodoros, xvii. 96).
^ Hephaistion by this arrangement
would beset the banks of the Hydra-
6tes, Ptolemy those of the Akesines.
The former probably marched to the
Hydraotes by way of Shorkote,
which Cunningham thinks may be
the Soriane of Stephanos Byz.
•^ The Hydaspes loses its name as
well as its waters to the Akesines.
The junction of the latter with the
Hydraotes (Ravi) occurs at present
at a point more than thirty miles
above Multan, but in Alexander's
time it occurred some miles below
that city.
I40
THE INVASION OF INDIA
Chapter VI.— Alexander invades the territories of the
Malloi
Alexander selected for his own division the hypaspists
the archers the Agrianians, the corps of foot-guards under'
i^eithon, all the horse-archers, and the half of the com-
panion cavalry, and led them through a waterless tract of
country against the Malloi.^ a race of independent Indians.
On the first day he encamped near a small stream which
was twenty stadia distant from the river Akesines.
Havmg dmed there and allowed the army a short time
tor repose, he ordered every man to fill whatever vessel he
had with water. He then marched during the remainder
of the day and all night a distance of about 400 stadia,
fr r n f ^^^^"^ ""'''^^^ ^^^^'^ ^ ^^*^y t^ which many of
the Malloi had fled for refuge. As they never imagined
that Alexander would come to attack them through the
waterless desert, most of them were abroad in the fields
and without their arms ; and just as it was manifest that
he led his forces by this route because of the difficulties
It presented, so did it appear to the enemy past belief
that he would conduct an army by a way so perilous.
He thus fell upon them unexpectedly, and slew most of
them without their even turning to offer resistance, since
they were unarmed. The rest he shut up within the city
and as the phalanx of infantry had not yet arrived, he
posted the cavalry in a cordon round the wall, thus
making it serve for a stockade. No sooner, however, did
the infantry come up than he despatched Perdikkas with
his own cavalry regiment and that of Kleitos, together
with the Agrianians, to another city of the Malloi, into
which many of the Indians of that district had fled
tor refuge. He was enjoined to blockade the men in the
city, but not to attempt to storm the place until his own
arrival, so that no one might escape and carry the news of
Alexanders approach to the other barbarians. He then
^ See Note P, The Malloi and Oxydrakai.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT 141
made an assault upon the wall, which the barbarians
abandoned on seeing it could no longer hold out, since
many had been killed during the siege, and others dis-
abled for fighting by reason of their wounds. They fled
into the citadel, which, being seated on a commanding
height and difficult of access, they continued to defend
for some time. As the Macedonians, however, vigorously
pressed the attack at all points, while Alexander himself
was seen everywhere urging forward the work, the citadel
was stormed, and all the men who had fled to it for
refuge were put to the sword to the number of 2000.^
Perdikkas meanwhile reached the city whither he had
been sent, but on learning that the inhabitants had not
long before fled from it, he rode away at full gallop on the
track of the fugitives, while the light troops followed him
on foot as fast as they could. Some of the fugitives he
overtook and killed, but such as had been too quick for
him made their escape to the river marshes.^
^ General Cunningham has identi-
fied this place with Kot-Kamalia, a
small but ancient town situated on
an isolated mound on the right or
northern bank of the Ravi, marking
the extreme limit of the river's fluctua-
tions on that side. The small rivulet
on which Alexander encamped at the
end of his first march he believes to
be the lower course of the Ayek river
which rises in the outer range of hills
and flows past Syalkot towards
Sakala, below which the bed is still
traceable for some distance. It
appears again, he says, eighteen miles
to the east of Jhang, and is finally
lost about two miles to the east of
Shorkot. Now somewhere between
these two points Alexander must
have crossed the Ayek, as the desert
country which he afterwards traversed
lies immediately beyond it. If he
had marched to the south he would
have arrived at Shorkot, but he would
not have encountered any desert, as
his route would have been over the
Khadar, or low-lying lands in the
valley of the Chenab. A march of
forty-six miles in a southerly direction
would have carried him also right up
to^ the bank of the Hydraotes or
Ravi, a point which Alexander only
reached after another night's march.
As this march lasted from the first
watch until daylight, it cannot have
been less than eighteen or twenty
miles, which agrees exactly with the
distance of the Ravi opposite Tulamba
from Kot-Kamalia. The direction of
Alexander's march must therefore
have been to the south-east ; first to
the Ayek river, and thence across the
hard, clayey, and waterless tract
called Sandar-bar, that is the bar, a
desert of the Sandar or Chandra river.
Thus the position of the rivulet, the
description of the desolate country,
and the distance of the city from the
confluence of the rivers, all agree in
fixing the site of the fortress assaulted
by Alexander with Kot-Kamalia.—
Ahc. Geog. of India, pp. 208-210.
- The city to which Perdikkas
was sent in advance of Alexander,
Cunningham has identified with
Harapa. ** The mention of marshes
(he says) shows that it must have
been near the Ravi, and, as Perdikkas
was sent in advance of Alexander, it
must also have been beyond Kot-
143
THE INVASION OF INDIA
Chapter VI L — Siege and capture of several Mallian
strongholds
Alexander having dined and allowed his troops to rest
till the first watch of the night, began to march forward,
and having travelled a great distance in the night, arrived
at the river Hydraotes at daybreak. There he' learned
that many of the Malloi had already crossed to the other
bank, but he fell upon others who were in the act of
crossing and slew many of them during the passage. He
crossed the river along with them, just as he was, and by
the same ford. He then closely pursued the fugitives who
had outstripped him in their retreat. Many of these he
slew and he captured others, but most of them escaped to
a position of great natural strength which was also strongly
fortified.! But when the infantry came up with him,
Alexander sent Peithon with his own brigade and two
squadrons of cavalry against the fugitives. This detach-
ment attacked the stronghold, captured it at the first
assault, and made slaves of all who had fled into it,
except, of course, those who had fallen in the attack!
Kamalia, that is to the east or south-
east of it. Now this is exactly the
position of Harapa, which is situated
sixteen miles to the east-south-east of
Kot - Kamalia, and on the opposite
high bank of the Ravi. There are
also several marshes in the low ground
in its immediate vicinity." Cunning-
ham then gives a description of
Harapa as it now exists. He had
encamped at the place on three
different occasions. It had been
visited previously and described both
by Burnes and Masson. Its ruined
mound forms an irregular square of
half a mile on each side, or two miles
in circuit [Anc. Gcog. of India, pp.
2IO, 2ii). It seems to me a serious
objection to this identification that
Kot-Kamalia and Harapa (Harup, in
Ainsworth's large map) lie on opposite
sides of the Ravi, while Arrian's
narrative leads us to suppose that
they both lay to the west of that river.
No mention is made of Perdikkas
crossing it, and had the fortress he
attacked lain beyond it, he could
easily have intercepted the inhabi-
tants in their flight to the marshes of
the river.
^ Cunningham identifies this well-
fortified position with Tulamba. *♦ A
whole night's march (he says) of eight
or nine hours could not have been
less than twenty- five miles, which is
the exact distance of the Ravi oppo-
site Tulamba from Kot-Kamalia."
It was defended by brick walls and
enormous mounds of earthen ram-
parts. Tulamba lies on the high
road to Multan, to which, as the
capital of the Malloi, Alexander was
marching.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT 143
Then Peithon and his men, their task fulfilled, returned
to the camp.
Alexander himself next led his army against a certain
city of the Brachmans,i because he had learned that many
of the Malloi had fled thither for refuge. On reaching it
he led the phalanx in compact ranks against all parts of
the wall. The inhabitants, on finding the walls under-
mined, and that they were themselves obliged to retire
before the storm of missiles, left the walls and fled to the
citadel, and began to defend themselves from thence. But
as a few Macedonians had rushed in along with them,
they rallied, and turning round in a body upon the pur-
suers, drove some from the citadel and killed twenty-five
of them in their retreat. Upon this Alexander ordered
his men to apply the scaling ladders to the citadel on all
its sides, and to undermine its walls ; and when an under-
mined tower had fallen and a breach had been made in
the wall between two towers, thus exposing the citadel to
attack in that quarter, Alexander was seen to be the first
man to scale and lay hold of the wall. Upon seeing this,
the rest of the Macedonians for very shame ascended the
wall at various points, and quickly had the citadel in their
hands. Some of the Indians set fire to their houses, in
which they were caught and killed, but most part fell
^ The Brachmans, as is well known,
formed a religious caste, and were not
a distinct race or tribe. Their city
Cunningham has identified with the
old ruined town and fort of Atari,
which is situated twenty miles to the
west-south-west of Tulamba and on
the high road to Multan, from which
it is thirty-four miles distant. The
remains consist of a strong citadel
750 feet square and 35 feet
high. On two of its sides are to be
found the remains of the old town.
Of its history there is not even a
tradition, but the large size of its
bricks shows that it must be a place
of considerable antiquity. The name
of the old city is quite unknown,
Atari being merely that of the adja-
cent village, which is of recent origin.
Curtius states that Alexander went
completely round the citadel in a
boat, and Cunningham thinks this is
probable enough, as its ditch could
be filled at pleasure with water from
the Ravi. Curtius must, however,
be romancing when he says that the
three greatest rivers in India except
the Ganges (Indus, Hydaspes, and
Akesines) joined their waters to form
a ditch round the castle (v. Anc.
Geog. of Jfidia, pp. 228-230). The
mention of a special city of the
Brachmans, Lassen observes, shows
that but few priests lived in this part
of the country, and that they had
established themselves in particular
cities to protect themselves against
those people by whom they were held
in but small esteem.
144
THE INVASION OF INDIA
fighting. About 5000 in all were killed, and, as they
were men of spirit, a few only were taken prisoners.
Chapter VIII. — Alexander defeats the Malloi at the
Hydraotes
He remained there one day to give his army rest, and
next day he moved forward to attack the rest of the
Malloi. He found their cities abandoned, and ascer-
tamed that the inhabitants had fled into the desert.
There he again allowed the army a day's rest and next
day sent Peithon and Demetrios, the cavalry commander
back to the river with their own troops, and as many
battalions of light-armed infantry as the nature of the
work required. He directed them to march along the
edge of the river, and if they came upon any of those who
had fled for refuge to the jungle, of which there were
numerous patches along the river-bank, to put them all to
death unless they voluntarily surrendered. The troops
under these two officers captured many of the fugitives in
these jungles and killed them.
He marched himself against the largest city of the
Malloi, to which he was informed many men from their
other cities had fled for safety. The Indians, however
abandoned this place also when they heard that Alex-
ander was approaching. They then crossed the Hydradtes
and with a view to obstruct Alexander's passage, remained
drawn up in order of battle upon the banks, because they
were very steep. On learning this, he took all the cavalry
which he had with him, and marched to that part of the
Hydradtes where he had been told the Malloi were
posted ; and the infantry were directed to follow after
him. When he came to the river and descried the enemy
drawn up on the opposite bank, he plunged at once, just
as he was after the march, into the ford, with the cavalry
only. When the enemy saw Alexander now in the
middle of the stream they withdrew in haste, but yet in
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT j^,
good order, from the bank, and Alexander pursued them
Z\'^ ^^J^lry only. But when the Indians perceived
he had nothing but a party of horse with him, they faced
round and fought stoutly, being about 50,000 in number.
Alexander perceiving that their phalanx was very com-
pact, and his own infantry not on the ground, rode along
all round them, and sometimes charged their ranks, but
^l K*; r '^""*^'''- M^^"^hile the Agrianians and
other battalions of light-armed infantry, which consisted
In"^^ "1"!' ^'"''"f °" '^' ^^^^ ^^°"g ^^ith the archers,
while the phalanx of infantry was showing in sight at no
great distance off". As they were threatened at once with
so many dangers, the Indians wheeled round, and with
headlong speed fled to the strongest of all the cities that
lay near. Alexander killed many of them in the pursuit
while those who escaped to the city were shut up within
Its walls. At first, therefore, he surrounded the place with
his horsemen as soon as they came up from the march.
But when the infantry arrived he encamped around the
wall on every side for the remainder of this day— a time
too short for making an assault, to say nothing of the
great fatigue his army had undergone, the infantry from
their long march, and the cavalry by the continuous pur-
suit, and especially by the passage of the river.
Oiapter I X .—Alexander assails the chief stronghold of the
Malloi scales the wall of the citadel, into which he
leaps doivn though alone
On the following day, dividing his army into two
parts, he himself assaulted the wall at the head of one
division, while Perdikkas led forward the other Upon
this the Indians, without waiting to receive the attack of
the Macedonians, abandoned the walls and fled for refuge
to the citadel. Alexander and his troops therefore burst
open a small gate, and entered the city long before the
' See Note Q, The capital of the Malloi.
146
THE INVASION OF INDIA
others. But Perdikkas and the troops under his com-
mand entered it much later, having found it no easy work
to surmount the walls. The most of them, in fact, had
neglected to bring scaling ladders, for when they saw
the wall left without defenders they took it for granted
that the city had actually been captured. But when it
became clear that the enemy was still in possession of the
citadel, and that many of them were drawn up in front of
it to repel attack, the Macedonians endeavoured to force
their way into it, some by sapping the walls, and others
by applying the scaling ladders wherever that was practic-
able. Alexander, thinking that the Macedonians who
carried the ladders were loitering too much, snatched one
from the man who carried it, placed it against the wall,
and began to ascend, cowering the while under his shield!
The next to follow was Peukestas, who carried the sacred
shield which Alexander had taken from the temple of the
Ilian Athena, and which he used to keep with him and
have carried before him in all his battles.^ Next to him
Leonnatos, an officer of the bodyguard, ascended by the
same ladder ; and by a different ladder Abreas, one of
those soldiers who for superior merit drew double pay "
and allowances. The king was now near the coping of
the wall, and resting his shield against it, was pushing
some of the Indians within the fort, and had cleared the
parapet by killing others with his sword. The hypaspists,
now alarmed beyond measure for the king's safety, pushed
each other in their haste up the same ladder and broke it,
so that those who were already mounting it fell down and
made the ascent impracticable for others.
Alexander, while standing on the wall, was then
assailed on every side from the adjacent towers, for none
of the Indians had the courage to come near him. He
^ Arrian (i. ii) relates that Alex-
ander, after crossing the Hellespont,
proceeded to I lion, where, after sacri-
ficing to the Trojan Athene, he
placed his own armour in the temple
of that goddess, and took away in
exchange some of the consecrated
arms which had been preserved from
the time of the Trojan war.
^ Called in Greek a dimoiritis in
Latin a duplicarius.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT ,47
was assailed also by men in the city, who threw darts at
h.m from no great distance off, for it so happened that a
mound of earth had been thrown up in thaf quarter cL:
to the wall. Alexander was, moreover, a conspicuous
object both by the splendour of his arms' and the aston
jshmg audacity he displayed. He then perceived thltlf
he remamed where he was, he would be exposed to
danger wuhout being able to achieve anything noteworthy^
but .f he leaped down mto the citadel he might perhaps
by th.s very act paralyse the Indians with terror and if
he did not, but necessarily incurred danger, he would in
that case not die ignobly, but after performing great deeds
worth bemg remembered by the men of after times
the SL"^ "tr^' ^' ''"P"^ ^°"" '■^°'" the wall into
the citadel Then, supporting himself against the wall
he slew with h.s sword some who assailed him at clo e
quarters and in particular the governor of the Indians
who had rushed upon him too boldly. Against another'
Ind.an whom he saw approaching, he hurled a stone to
check h>s advance, and another he similarly repelled If
sword. The barbanans had then no further wish to
approach h.m, but standing around assailed him from all
quarters with whatever missiles they carried or could lay
their hands on. -^
C/iapUr X. —Alexander is dangerously wounded zvithin the
citadel
At this crisis Peukestas,
after them Leonnatos, the
* Alexander's dress and arms on
the day of Arbela are thus described
by Plutarch : "He wore a short tunic
of the Sicilian fashion, girt close
round him, over a linen breastplate
strongly quilted; his helmet, sur-
mounted by the white plume, was of
polished steel, the work of Theophilos-
the gorget was of the same metal, and
set with precious stones ; the sword
his favourite weapon in battle, was a
and Abreas the dimoirite, and
only men who succeeded in
present from a Cyprian king, and not
to be excelled for lightness or temper ;
but his belt, deeply embossed with
massive figures, was the most superb
Fi?''^T3u i^ ^'■"'''"^ ^ ^' ^^s a gift from
the Khodians, on which old Helikon
had exerted all his skill. If we add
to these the shield, lance, and light
greaves, we may form a fair idea of
nis appearance in battle."
t--
148
THE INVASION OF INDIA
reaching the top of the wall before the ladder broke,
leaped down and began fighting in front of the king!
But there Abreas fell, pierced in the forehead by an
arrow. Alexander himself was also struck by one which
pierced through his cuirass into his chest above the pap,
so that, as Ptolemy says, air gurgled from the wound
along with the blood. But sorely wounded as he was, he
continued to defend himself as long as his blood was still
warm. Since much blood, however, kept gushing out
vv^th every breath he drew, a dizziness and faintness seized
him, and he fell where he stood in a collapse upon his
shield. Peukestas then bestrode him where he fell, hold-
ing up in front of him the sacred shield which had been
taken from Ilion, while Leonnatos protected him from
side attacks. But both these men were severely wounded,
V and Alexander was now on the point of swooning away
from the loss of blood. As for the Macedonians, they
were at a loss how to make their way into the citadel,
because those who had seen Alexander shot at upon the
wall and then leap down inside it had broken down the
ladders up which they were rushing in all haste, dreading
lest their king, in recklessly exposing himself to danger,
should come by some hurt. In their perplexity they
devised various plans for ascending the wall. It was
made of earth, and so some drove pegs into it, and swing-
ing themselves up by means of these, scrambled with
difficulty to the top. Others ascended by mounting one
upon the other. The man who first reached the top
flung himself headlong from the wall into the city, and
was followed by the others. There, when they saw the
king fallen prostrate, they all raised loud lamentations
and outcries of grief. And now around his fallen form a
desperate struggle ensued, one Macedonian after another
holding his shield in front of him. In the meantime,
some of the soldiers having shattered the bar by which
the gate in the wall between the towers was secured, made
their way into the city a few at a time, and others,' when
they saw that a rift was made in the gate, put their
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
149
shoulders under it, and having then pushed it into the
space withm the wall, opened an entrance into the citadel
m that quarter.
Chapter XL—Dangerous nature of Alexander's wound—
Arrian refutes some current fictions relating to this
accident
Upon this some began to kill the Indians, and in the
massacre spared none, neither man, woman, nor child
Others bore off the king upon his shield. His condition
was very low, and they could not yet tell whether he was
likely to survive. Some writers have asserted that
Kritodemos, a physician of Kos, an Asklepiad by birth,^
extracted the weapon from the wound by making an
mcision where the blow had struck. Other writers, how-
ever, say that as no surgeon was present at this terrible
crisis, Perdikkas, an officer of the bodyguard, at Alexander's
own desire, made an incision into the wound with his sword
and removed the weapon. Its removal was followed by
such a copious effusion of blood that Alexander again
swooned, and the swoon had the effect of staunching the
flux. Many fictions also have been recorded by historians
concerning this accident, and Fame, receiving them from
the original inventors, has preserved them to our own day
nor will she cease to transmit the falsehoods to one
generation after another except they be finally suppressed
by this history.
The common account, for example, is that this accident
befell Alexander among the Oxydrakai, but in fact it
occurred among the Malloi an independent Indian nation
The city belonged to the Malloi, and the men who
wounded Alexander were Malloi. They had certainly
1 The descendants of Asklepios
(Aesculapius) were called by the
patronymic name AiWpiadai. They
were regarded by some as the real
descendants of Asklepios, but by
others as a caste of priests who prac-
tised the art of medicine, combined
with religion. Their principal seats
were Kos and Knidos.
i/^
ISO
THE INVASION OF INDIA
f!
agreed to combine with the Oxydrakai and give battle to
the common enemy, but Alexander had thwarted this
design by his sudden and rapid march through the water-
less country, whereby these tribes were prevented from
givmg each other mutual help. To take another instance
accordmg to the common account, the last battle fought
vyith Darius (that at which he fled, nor paused in his flight
till he was seized by the soldiers of Bessos and murdered
at Alexander's approach) took place at Arbela, just as the
previous battle came off at Issos, and the first cavalry
action at the Granikos. Now this cavalry action was
really fought at the Granikos, and the next battle with
Darius at Issos. But Arbela is distant from the field
where Darius and Alexander had their last battle 600
stadia according to those authors who make the distance
greatest, and 500 stadia according to those who make it
least. But Ptolemy and Aristoboulos say that the battle
took place at Gaugamela near the river Boumodos. Gauga-
me a,however,was not a city,but merely a good-sized villa-^e
a place of no distinction, and bearing a name which offends
the ear. This seems to me the reason why Arbela, which
was a city, has carried off the glory of the great battle.' But
If vve must perforce consider that this battle took place near
Arbela, though fought at so great a distance off, then we
may as well say that the sea fight at Salamis came oft
near the Isthmus of Corinth, and the sea-fight at Arte-
mision in Euboia, near Aigina or Sunium.
With regard again to those who protected Alexander
with their shields in his peril, all agree that Peukestas was
of the number, but with respect to Leonnatos and Abreas
the dimoirite, they are no longer in harmony. Some say
that Alexander received a blow on his helmet from a
bludgeon and fell down in an access of dizziness, and that
. . ^. ^'"'"'='' ""'^5 'o 'he same effect :
The great battle with Darius was
not fought at Arbela, as most historians
will have it, but at Gaugamela, which,
in the Persian tongue, is said to
signify the house of the camel, so called
because one of the ancient kings,
haying escaped his enemies by the
swiftness of his camel, placed her
there, and appointed the revenues of
certain villages for her maintenance."
— Life of Alexander, c. 31.
■■isa^^ife
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT 151
on regaining his feet he was hit by a dart which pierced
through his breastplate into his chest. But Ptolemy the
son of Lagos, says that this wound in his chest was the
only one he received. I take, however, the following to
be the greatest error into which the historians of Alexander
have fallen. Some have written that Ptolemy, the son of
Lagos, along with Peukestas mounted the ladder together
with Alexander ; that Ptolemy held his shield over him
when he was lying on the ground,
and that he thence received the sur-
name of Soter.i And yet Ptolemy
himself has recorded that he was not
present at this conflict, but was fight-
ing elsewhere against other bar-
barians, in command of a different
division of the army. Let me
mention these facts in digressing
from my narrative that the men of
after times may not regard it as a matter of indiff-erence
how these great deeds and great suff-erings are reported.
Chapter XIL— Distress and anxiety of the army at the
prospect of Alexander's death
While Alexander remained at this place to be cured of
his wound, the first news which reached the camp whence
he had started to attack the Malloi was that he had died
of his wound. Then there arose at first a loud lamenta-
tion from the whole army, as the mournful tidings spread
from man to man. But when their lamentation was ended,
they gave way to despondency and anxious doubts about
the appointment of a commander to the army, for among
y
Fig. 10. — Ptolemy
SOT^R.
Kleitarchos, who accompanied
Alexander to Asia, and wrote a
history of the expedition, and Tima-
genes, an historian in the reign of
Augustus, gave currency to this fiction,
which Curtius is at one with Arrian
m rejecting. Ptolemy received his
title of Soter (saviour) from the
Rhodians, whom he had relieved
from the attacks of Demetrios Polior-
ketes {v. Pausanias, I. viii. 6).
152
THE INVASION OF INDIA
the officers many could advance claims to that dignity
which both to Alexander and the Macedonians seemfd of
equal weight. They were also in fear and doubt how
hey could be conducted home in safety, surrounded as
they were on a 1 hands by warlike nations, some not yet
reduced but hkely to fight resolutely for their freedom
wh.e others would to a certainty revolfwhen relieved from
the.r fear of Alexander. They seemed besides to be iu^
then among impassable rivers, while the whole outlook
lTtT.U "°'t-"^ '"' ''"^^^"^^^'"^ '^'■'^-'ties when hej
wanted the.r king. But on receiving word that he was
till ahve, they could hardly think it true, or persuade
hemselves that he was likely to recover. Even when a
oon" e""! T ''; '■■ K^ '""^^'^ ■"*""^''"^ '^'' ^^ ^ouM
Scess o^L T ? ''' '''"P' "'°'' °f ''''"^ fr^"^ the
excess of fear which possessed them distrusted the news,
S Lod'l r' H !; '"' '^"" "^^ ^ '"°'-^-y —ted by
nis body-guards and generals.
aaj>Ur XIIL-Joy of the army on seeing Alexander after
Ins reeovery-His officers rebuke him for Ms rashness
On coming to know this. Alexander, anxious to prevent
any commotions arising in the army, as soon as he cou"d
rire; hISIT' '^?'T'' ^^"^•^>'^ ^° *he banks ofte
r ver Hydraotes and embarking there, he sailed down the
nd theTk - '^"^l '' *'^ ^■""^*'°" °f ^^^ Hydrate
and the Akesines where Hephaistion commanded the
and forces and Nearchos the fleet. When the vessel
which earned the king was now approaching the camp he
ordered the awning to be removed from the poop thft' he
n|.ght be visible to all. They were, however, Un yet
in redulous, supposing that the freight of the vesTel was
r^ sTht" '''?°'^' ""*'■' ^^ "^^-^ '^^ bank, wh n he
S ZZ "' ■V'':' °"' ^''^ '^-^ '- the multitude.
Ihen the men raised a loud cheer, and lifted up their
hands, some towards heaven and some towards Alexande
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
^53
himself. Tears even started involuntarily to the eyes of
not a few at the unexpected sight. Some of the hypaspists
brought him a litter where he was carried ashore from the
vessel, but he called for his horse. When he was seen
once more on horseback, the whole army greeted him with
loud acclamations, which filled with their echoes the shores
and all the surrounding hills and dales. On approaching
his tent he dismounted that he might be seen walking!
Then the soldiers crowded round him, touching some his
hands, others his knees, and others nothing but his raiment.
Some, satisfied with nothing more than a near view, went
away with expressions of admiration. Others 'again
covered him with garlands, and others with the flowers of
the clime and the season.
Nearchos says that he was offended with certain of his '
friends who reproached him for exposing himself to danger
when leading the army, for this, they said, was not the
duty of a commander, but of a common soldier, and it
seems to me that Alexander resented these remarks
because he felt their truth, and knew he had laid himself
open to censure. Owing, however, to his prowess in "
fighting and his love of glory, he, like other men who are
swayed by some predominant pleasure, yielded to tempta-
tion, lacking sufficient force of will to hold aloof from
dangers. Nearchos also says that a certain elderly Boiotian
(whose name he does not give) observing that Alexander
resented the censures of his friends, and was giving them
sour looks, approached him, and in the Boiotian tongue
thus addressed him : " O Alexander, it is for heroes to do
great deeds," and then he subjoined an Iambic verse, the
purport of which was that he who did any great deed was
bound also to suffer.' The man, it is said, not only found
favour with Alexander, but was admitted afterwards to
closer intimacy.
ix
^ Thirlwall has noted that this line
is found in Stobaeus. It is a fragment
from one of the lost tragedies of
Aeschylus, SpdaavrL yap tl Kal jradetv
6'^ ^-^-i the b '
flu nceofthe'Ar "■ ^'''^^"'^^ ^"^^^ '^^'^ ^^e con-
satraov of Ph-I "r^^ ^"^"' ^' '^' b°""dary of the
satrapy of Ph.hppos, and left with him all the Thracians
T.L:: oT"h^ ^°°*-f°'^-- - -med sufficient for th
delence of his province. Then he ordered a city to be
ounded there at the very confluence of the riversThopin.
yards X\ /''V f ° ''"' '^°"^*--*'- °f '^-k
of ilexa^2^'"l ''' ''"''"^" °-^>'^''*^^' *he father
.L A.T ^^^ ^°''^"^' ^^"^ed, and on him he be-
stowed the satrapy of the Parapamisadai after dismissing
The Xathroi are the Kshatri of
banskrit mentioned in the Laws of
Manu as an impure tribe, bein^ of
mixed ongm. In Williams's Sa,^s^n^
Uictionary a Kshdtnh defined as "a
man of the second {i.e. mihtary) caste
(by a woman of another caste?) "
in ^iC^'n^ Saint-Martin suggests that
m the Ossadtot we have the Vasdti or
Basati of the Ma/uU/idrata, a people
whom Hematchandra in his Geo-
graphual Dictionary places between
the Hydas]>es and the Indus, on the
plateau of which the Salt Mountains
lorm the southern escarpment. If the
Vasati were really so placed, it can
scarcely be supposed that they would
have sent offers of submission to
Alexander, who had already passed
through their part of the country, and
was now marching homeward, leavinjr
them far m his rear. Cunningham
prefers to identify them with the
Yaudheya or Ajudhiya, now the
Johiyas who are settled as for-
merly along the banks of the lower
^at ej. Assodioi or Ossadioi seems a
pre«y close transcription o{ Ajudhiya.
1 he name of this city is not given
by any of the historians, but in all
probability it bore the name of its
founder. Its site has generally been
referred to the neighbourhood of
Mithankot, a town situated on the
western bank of the Indus a little
below the junction of that river with
the united streams of the Panjab. V
de Saint -Martin identifies it more
precisely with Chuchpur or Chuchur
ZT'^1 fort standing on the eastenJ
5ni i^."" !^t?"'J"' "Sht opposite Mith-
ankot. This fort bore formerly the
names of Askalanda, Askelendf and
Sikander, which are but variant forms
of Alexandreia. The great confluence,
^IvZ' t> T '-^"^i^^tly take place
at Mithankot, but at Uchh, an old city
ymg forty miles to the north-east of
the confluence at Mithank6t. The
place IS called by Hashed -ud- din
Askaland . usah, which, as Cunning-
ham points out, would be an easy
corruption of Alexandria Uchha or
C/^ja as the Greeks must have written
t. 1 he word uchha means **hieh"
both m Sanskrit and in Hindi, and
Uchh seems to owe its name to the
Uchh is chiefly distinguished (says
Masson) by the ruins of the former
towns, which are very extensive, and
attes the pristine prosperity of the
locahty." V. V. de Saint -Martin!
Etude pp. ,24, ,25 ; Cunningham';
-^nc. Geog. of India, pp. 242-245.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT 157
the previous satrap Tyriaspes, who had been reported
guilty of irregularities in the exercise of his authority.
Then he transported Krateros, with the bulk of the
army and the elephants, to the left side of the river
Indus, because the route along that bank of the river
seemed easier for an army heavily accoutred, and because
the tribes inhabiting those parts were not quite friendly.
He sailed himself down to the capital of the Sogdoi, where
he fortified another city, constructed other dockyards, and
repaired his damaged vessels. He then appointed Oxy-
artes and Peithon satraps of the country which extended
from the confluence of the Indus and Akesines to the sea.
together with the whole sea-board of India.^
Krateros he again despatched with the army [through
the country of the Arachotians and Drangians] ; while he
sailed down himself to the realm of Mousikanos,^ which
was reported to be the most opulent in India, because
that sovereign had neither come to surrender himself and
his country, nor sent envoys to seek his friendship. He
had not even sent presents to show the respect due to a
^ V. Note R, Alexander in Sindh.
^ In Strabo (XV. i. ) we find several
references to the country of Mousi-
kanos. These were based on infor-
mation supplied by Onesikritos, who
expatiates in praise of its fertility, on
the virtues of its people, and the good-
ness of the laws and government
under which they lived. It seems
now generally agreed that Alor, which
was anciently and for many ages the
metropolis of the rich and powerful
kingdom of Upper Sindh, was the
capital of Mousikanos. Its ruins were
visited by M 'Murdo and Lieutenant
Wood, and afterwards by General
Cunningham, who thus describes
their site: "The ruins of Alor are
situated to the south of a gap in the
low range of sandstone hills which
stretches from Bhakar towards the
south for about twenty miles until it
is lost in a broad belt of sandhills
which bound the Nara, or old bed of
the Indus, on the west. Through
this gap a branch of the Indus once
flowed, which protected the city on
the north-west. To the north-east it
was covered by a second branch of
the river, which flowed nearly at right
angles to the other at a distance of
three miles. ... In a. d. 680 the
latter was probably the main stream
of the Indus, which had gradually
been working to the westward from
its original bed in the old Nara."
With regard to the name of the king
it appears to be a territorial title,
since Curtius designates the people
Musicani. Lassen {Ind. Alt. ii. 176)
takes this to represent the Sanskrit
Mushika (which means a mouse or a
thief), and points out that a part of
the Malabar coast was also called the
Miishika kingdom. Saint - Martin
thinks that the Mushika still exist in
the great tribe of the Moghsis, which
forms the most numerous part of the
population of Kach Gandara, a region
bordering on the territories of the
ancient Musikani {Etude, p. 162).
158
THE INVASION OF INDIA
mighty kmg, nor had he asked any favour from Alexander
Sat tr t T'f ;'^ ^°>'^^^ ^°^" ^he river so rapTd^
before t at ot ''"' !'T'''' °' ^^^ -""'''y °f Mousikanos
started to .n I' v 'T" '''"'' '^^' ^'^^-"der had
s?dd.n I ^""- Mousikanos, dismayed by his
^ sudden a rival, hastened to meet him, faking the choices
I presents India could offer and all his elephants vvithhTr^
He offered to surrender both his nation and himself and
a knou edged his error, which was the most effecrive\"y
riexaniefthf /' °''"" '"" '^'"^ ^^'^^^^-^ °- -ntel
account o Jt r-^''"'"' M^"^''^^"^^ ^ f"" Pardon on
admTa io ' it'cIZ, Tn'd T"^"?' ^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^
k- • , • capital and his rea m, and confirmpH
nim in his soverpiVnH, i^ x. "-ounrmea
f^ f-r .u ^°^^'^^'S"ty- Krateros was then ordered to
fortify the citadel which protected the capita" and th !
work was executed while Alexander was sS o^ the spo
suifabrr r ^^'^^^ ^ ^^^ ^°'-^--' -^.-ch he thought
suitable for keeping the surrounding tribes in subjection
Cfe/,^ ^f/._C„,/„i, ;^,,-^, o.}ka„o, and Sa.,i,.
name was Oxykanos hpranc^ i.^ -^i. ^ wuu^jc
"^ ' °^^^"se he neither came him«;i-1f
couX'^^Zr f " ''^ ^""^"^^^ °f ^"--^' and hi
country. At the first assault he took by storm the two
1 /"• i* ...
Curtius calls the subjects of Oxy-
kanos the Praesti, a name which would
indicate that they inhabited a level
country since the Sanskrit word of
which their name is a transcript-
prastha—denoies a tableland ox a level
clause. The name, Saint - Martin
ininks, IS in Justin altered to Pme-
stdae ; but Justin, it appears to me
IS called both by Strabo and Diodoros
LnskHrP^'^r^'!r*^"S perhaps the
Sanskrit Farl/ia, "a prince." It is
not easy to determine where his
dominions lay. They were not on
the Indus, for Alexander left that
nver to attack them. Cunningham
places them to the west of the Indus
whVK Z T"^'^^^'"^""^ Larkhana.
which, though now close to the Indus
was ,n Alexander's time about forty
miles distant from it. Their capital he
dentifies with Mahorta, a place about
ten miles north-west from Larkhana
where there are the remains of an
ancient fortress on a huge mound.
mddha "very high." Lassen, on
the other hand, followed by Saint-
Martin, places the country of Oxy-
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT 159
largest cities under the rule of Oxykanos, in the second
of which that chief himself was taken prisoner. The
booty he gave to the army, but the elephants he led away
and reserved for himself The other cities in the same
country surrendered without attempting resistance wher-
ever he advanced ; so much were the minds of all the
Indians paralysed with abject terror by Alexander and
the success of his arms.
He then advanced against Sambos, whom he had
appointed satrap of the Indian mountaineers, and who
was reported to have fled on hearing that Mousikanos
had been pardoned by Alexander, and was ruling his own
land, for he and Mousikanos were on hostile terms. But
when Alexander approached the city called Sindimana,i
which formed the metropolis of the country of Sambos,
the gates were thrown open on his arrival, and the mem-
bers of the household of Sambos with his treasure (of
which they had reckoned up the amount) and his elephants
went forth to meet him. Sambos,' these men informed
him, had fled, not from hostility to Alexander, but from
fears to which the pardon of Mousikanos had given rise.
He captured besides another city,^ which had at this time
revolted, and he put to death all those Brachmans who
had instigated the revolt. These Brachmans are the
philosophers of the Indians, and of their philosophy, if so
it may be called, I shall give an account in my work
which describes India.
Chapter XVI I. — Mousikanos is captured by Peithon and
executed— Alexander reaches Patala at the apex of the
Indus Delta
Meantime he received word that Mousikanos had
revolted. Thereupon he despatched the satrap Peithon,
Martin, Etude, p. 165 ; Cunningham,
Anc. Geog. of India, pp. 259-262).
^ See note S, Sindimana.
2 See Note T. City of the Brach-
mans, Harmatelia; also Note H/5,
Indian Philosophers.
kanos to the east of the river, and
therefore in the vast Mesopotamia
(the Prasiane of Pliny) comprised
between the old or eastern arm of
the Indus and the present channel
{v. Lassen, Ind. Alt. ii. 177; Saint-
i6o
THE INVASION OF INDIA
(
the son of Agenor, against him with an adequate force
wh,le he marched himself against the cities which had
been placed under the rule of Mousikanos. Some of
Ittft. !l ""'' '° '^' r""^ ^^'" ^^^"'^'■"S the inhabit.
?ortfilVr*'''''"!.°,°'^"'' ^" introduced garrisons and
fort,fied the.r c.tadels. When these operations were
finished he returned to the camp and the fleet-whithe^
Mousikanos was conducted, who had been taken prisoner
by Peithon. Alexander ordered the rebel to be taken
o his own country and hanged there, together with all
those Brachmans who had instigated him to revolt. Then
there came to him the ruler of the country of the Patalians
which, as I have stated, consists of the Delta formed by
the nver Indus, and is larger than the Egyptian Delta
Th.s chief surrendered to him the whole of his land and
entrusted both himself and all his possessions to Wm
Alexander sent him back to his government with orders
to make all due preparations for the reception of his
expedition. He then sent away Krateros into Karmania
by the route through the Arachotians and the Sarangians '
leading the brigades of Attalos, Meleager, and Antigene^
along with some of the archers and such of the com-'
In the 15th chapter of this book
Arrian states that Alexander had sent
Krateros away by this route after he
had left the Sogdian capital (near
iihakar). From this we may infer
that Krateros, soon after he set out
on his homeward march, had been
temporarily recalled by Alexander,
who may have found the resistance to
his arms more formidable than he had
anticipated. Strabo states in one
place (XV. ii. 5) that Krateros set out
on his march from the Hydaspes and
proceeded through the country of the
Arachotoi and the Drangai into Kar-
mania, and in another (XV. ii. u)
that he traversed Choarene and en-
tered Karmania simultaneously with
Alexander. Now the former of these
routes would have been so needlessly
circuitous that it cannot be supposed
It was that which Krateros selected.
He no doubt marched through Choa-
rene (the district of Ariana nearest
India) to which there was access
trom India through the Bolan Pass.
Before rejoining Alexander he must
have encountered formidable diffi-
culties in traversing the great desert
ot Karman, which occupies the
northern part of Karmania. and ex-
tends from thence to the confines of
j ezd, Khorasan, and Seistan. * * This
desert (says Bun bury) is a vast track
ot the most unmitigated barrenness,
and a considerable portion of this
mterposed between the fertile districts
of Murmansheer in Northern Car-
mama and the Lake Zarrah in Seistan
must of necessity have been traversed
by Lraterus with his army. An Afghan
army which invaded Persia in 1710
suffered the most dreadful hardships
in this waste " {v. his ///s^. of Anc.
Geog. p. 522, also Droysen's Geschichte
Alexanders, p. 454, and Lassen, Ind.
Alt. 11. 180).
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT 161
panions and other Macedonians as he was sending home
to Macedonia as unfit for further service. He also sent
away the elephants with him. The rest of the army
except that portion which with himself was sailing down
to the sea, was placed under the command of Hephaistion
reithon, who led the horse-lancers and the Agrianians he
transported to the opposite bank so that he might not be
on that side of the river by which Hephaistion was to
advance. Peithon was instructed to put colonists into
the cities which had just been fortified, to suppress any
msurrection which the Indians might attempt, to introduce
settled order among them, and then to join him at Patala
On the third day after Alexander had started on the
voyage, he was informed that the Prince of Patala was
fleemg from that city, taking with him most of its in-
habitants, and leaving the country deserted. He accord-
ingly accelerated his voyage down the river, and on
reaching Patala found that both the city itself and the
cultivated lands which lay around it had been deserted
by the inhabitants. But he despatched his lightest troops
in pursuit of the fugitives, and when some of these had
been captured sent them on to their countrymen to bid
them take courage and return, for they were free to in-
habit their city and cultivate their lands as formerly ; and
so most of them did return.^
According to Aristoboulos, as
cited by Strabo (XV. i. 17), the
voyage down stream from Nikaia on
the Hydaspes to Patala occupied ten
months. "The Greeks (he says)
remained at the Hydaspes while the
ships were constructing, and began
their voyage not many days before
the setting of the Pleiades (late in the
autumn of B.C. 326), and were occu-
pied during the whole autunm, winter,
and the ensuing spring and summer
in sailing down the river, and arrived
at Patalene about the rising of the
dog-star (towards the end of summer
B.C. 325). The passage down the
river lasted ten months." According
to Plutarch, Alexander spent seven
months in falling down the rivers to
the ocean. Sir A. Burnes ascended
the Indus up to Lahore in sixty days,
a distance of about 1000 miles. He
estimated that a boat could drop down
from Lahore to the sea in fifteen days»
and from Multan in nine days.
M
1 62
THE INVASION OF INDIA
Chapter XVIII.— Alexander orders wells to be dug in the
district round Patala, and sails down the western arm
of the Indus
After directing Hephaistion to construct a citadel in
Patala, he sent out men into the adjacent country which
was waterless, to dig wells " and make it habitable. Some
of the barbarians in the neighbourhood attacked them
and, as they fell upon them quite unexpectedly killed
several of their number, but as the assailants lost many
on their own side, they fled to the desert. The men were
thus able to complete the work they were sent to execute
especially as Alexander, on learning that they had been
attacked by the barbarians, had sent additional troops to
take part in the work.
Near Patala the stream of the Indus is divided into
two large rivers,'^ both of which retain the name of the
Indus till they enter the sea. Here Alexander set about
the construction of a roadstead and dock, and when some
satisfactory progress had been made with these undertak-
mgs, he resolved to sail down to the mouth of the nVht
arm of the river.= To Leonnatos he gave the command
of about 1000 cavalry and 8000 heavy and light infantry
and despatched him to move down the island of Patala'
holding along the shore in a line with the squadron of
ships. He set out himself on a voyage down the right
arm of the river, taking with him the fastest vessels w-ith
one and a half bank of oars, all the thirty-oared galleys
and several of the smaller craft. As the Indians of that
region had fled, he had no pilot to direct his course and
this made the navigation all the more difficult. Then on
' In the 41st chapter of the Peri-
plus of the Erythraian Sea it is said
that in the regions adjoining the Indus
mouths "there are preserved even to
this very day memorials of the ex-
pedition of Alexander, old temples,
foundations of camps, and large
wells,"
' V. Note U, Patala.
This was the northern channel
of the Ghara, the waters of which
some centuries after Alexander, found
another channel more to the south
in the southern Ghara which joins the
mam stream below \Ax\ Bandar.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT ,63
the second day after he had started a storm arose, and
the gale blowing against the current made deep furrows
in the river, and battered the hulls of the vessels so
violently that most of his ships were damaged, while some
of the thirty-oared galleys were completely wrecked, though
the sailors managed to run them on shore before they
went all to pieces in the water. Other vessels were there-
fore constructed ; and Alexander, having despatched the
quickest of the light-armed troops some distance into the
interior, captured some Indians, whom he employed in
piloting his fleet for the rest of the voyage. But when
they found themselves where the river expands to the
vast breadth of 200 stadia the wind blew strong from
the outer sea, and the oars could scarcely be raised in the
swell. They therefore again drew toward the shore for
refuge, and the fleet was steered by the pilots into the
mouth of a canal.
Cliapter XIX.— The fleet is damaged by the tide, halts at an
island in the Indus, and thence reaches the open sea
While the fleet was at anchor here, a vicissitude to
which the Great Sea is subject occurred, for the tide ebbed
and their ships were left on dry ground. This pheno-
menon, of which Alexander and his followers had no
previous experience, caused them no little alarm and
greater still was their dismay, when in due course of time
the tide advanced, and the hulls of the vessels were
floated aloft. Those vessels which it found settled in
the soft mud were uplifted without damage, and floated
again, nothing the worse for the strain ; but as for those
vessels which had been left on a drier part of the beach
and were not firmly embedded, some on the advance
of a massive wave fell foul of each other, while others
were dashed upon the strand and shattered in pieces.^
" Caesar's fleet, it is well known, Indus are not felt more than sivtv
Shores of Britain. The tides in the ham concludes that Alexander muit
164
THE INVASION OF INDIA
Alexander caused these vessels to be repaired as well as
circumstances allowed, and despatched men in advance
down the river in two boats to explore an island at
which the natives informed him he must anchor on his way
^i^-ii '?• J^^^ '^'"^ ^^^^ ^^^ "^"^^ ^^ the island was
Killouta. When he learned that the island had harbours
was of great extent, and yielded water, he ordered the
rest of the fleet to make its way thither, but he himself
with the fastest sailing ships advanced beyond the island
to see the mouth of the river, and ascertain whether it
offered a safe and easy passage out into the open main
When they had proceeded about 200 stadia beyond the
island, they descried another which lay out in the sea
Then they returned to the island in the river, and
Alexander, having anchored his ships near its extremity
offered sacrifice to those gods to whom, he said, Ammon
had enjoined him to sacrifice. On the following day he
sailed down to the other island which lay in the ocean
and approaching close to it also, offered other sacrifices to
other gods and in another manner. These sacrifices like
the others, he offered under sanction of an oracle given
by Ammon. He then advanced beyond the mouths of
the river Indus, and sailed out into the great main to
discover, as he declared, whether any land lay anywhere
near in the sea, but, in my opinion, chiefly that it mi^ht
be said that he had navigated the great outer sea of
u u u . ^^^" sacrificed bulls to the god Poseidon,
which he threw into the sea; and following up the
sacrifice with a libation, he threw the goblet and
bowls of gold into the bosom of the deep as thanks-
offerings, beseeching the god to conduct in safety the
then have reached as far as Bambhra
on the Ghara, which is about fifty
miles by water from the sea. The
breaking up of the monsoon, which
occurs in October, is attended with
high winds, intervals of calm, and
violent hurricanes.
^ Plutarch says that Alexander
called this island Skilloustis, but
others Psiltoukis. It was from this
island Nearchos started on his memor-
able voyage early in October, before
the monsoon had subsided. On his
reaching the port now called Karachi
the great emporium of the trade of the
Indus, he remained there for twenty-
four days, and renewed the voyage as
soon as the weather permitted.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
165
naval expedition which he intended to despatch under
Nearchos to the Persian Gulf and the mouths of the
Euphrates and Tigris.
Chapter XX. — Alexander after returning to Patala sails
down the eastern an^i of the Indus
On his return to Patala, he found the citadel fortified,
and Peithon arrived with his troops after completing the
objects of his expedition. Hephaistion was then ordered
to prepare what was requisite for the fortification of the
harbour, and the construction of a dockyard, for here at
the city of Patala, which stands where the river Indus
bifurcates, he meant to leave behind him a very consider-
able naval squadron.
He himself sailed down again to the Great Sea by the
other mouth of the Indus,^ to ascertain by which of the
mouths it was easier to reach the ocean. The mouths of
the river Indus are about 1800 stadia distant from each
other.2 When he was approaching the mouth, he came
to a large lake formed by the river in widening out,
unless, indeed, this watery expanse be due to rivers which
discharge their streams into it from the surrounding
districts, and give it the appearance of a gulf of the sea ; ^
^ The eastern branch of the Indus
is that now called the Phuleli. It
separates from the main channel at
Muttari, twelve miles above Haidara-
bad, and enters the sea by the Kori
estuary, named by Ptolemy the Loni-
bari mouth. Its bed is now almost
dry except at the time of the inunda-
tions, when it assumes the appear-
ance of a great river. At the lower
part of its course it is known as the
Guni. On its east side it receives the
branch of the Indus, which in ancient
times passed Aror, and is now called
the Purana darya or Old river.
- This exaggerated estimate Arrian
has taken from the Journal of Near-
chos. Aristoboulos said that the
distance was 1000 stadia. The truth
is here pretty accurately hit.
2 ;*This great lake (says Saint-
Martin) might have been the western
extremity of the Ran of Kachh, a
vast depression which abuts on the
point where the estuary begins, and
which for some months of the year
(from July to October) is inundated
by the waters of several rivers. By
a singular coincidence the terrible
earthquake of 1 8 19 has formed a large
hollow and created a spacious lake
traversed by the Kori, and occupying
probably the same site as the lake
mentioned by Arrian. Brahmanic
tradition, moreover, preserves the
memory of a lake formerly existing
i66
THE INVASION OF INDIA
for salt-water fish were now seen in it of larger size
than the fish in our sea. Having anchored in the ]aler-
turbatis nostris novitate pignae {Bell.
Gall. iv. 34). See also Livy, x. 28.
- Arrian mentions gaps between
the waggons, but does not state that
they were fastened together. Vege-
tius {De re Militari, iii. lo), how-
ever, observes : "All barbarians
fasten their chariots together in a
ring in the fashion of a camp, and thus
keep themselves safe from surprise
during the night."
^ " It is impossible to compare the
numbers given by Curtius and Arrian,
as neither gives the total of killed,
and the details of the numbers who
fell in the separate operations of the
siege are not so stated as to admit
of comparison " {Alex, in India, p.
130).
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
219
ferring to submit to the last extremities rather than sur-
render, others thinking that resistance on their part would
be altogether futile. But as no consultation was held in
common, those who were bent on surrendering threw open
the gates and admitted the enemy. Alexander would
have been justified in making the advocates of resistance
feel his displeasure, but he nevertheless pardoned them all
without exception, and after taking hostages marched
forward to the next city. As the hostages were led in
the van of the army, the defenders on the wall recognised
them to be their own countrymen, and invited them to a
conference. Here they were prevailed on to surrender,
when they were informed of the king's clemency to the
submissive, and his severity if opposed. In a similar way
he gained over other towns, and placed them under his
protection.
They entered next the dominions of King Sopithes,^
whose nation in the opinion of the barbarians excels
in wisdom, and lives under good laws and customs.
Here they do not acknowledge and rear children
according to the will of the parents, but as the officers
entrusted with the medical inspection of infants may
direct, for if they have remarked anything deformed or
defective in the limbs of a child they order it to be
killed.^ In contracting marriages they do not seek an
alliance with high birth, but make their choice by the
looks, for beauty in the children is a quality highly
appreciated.
Alexander had brought up his army before the capital
of this nation where Sopithes was himself resident. The
gates were shut, but as no men-at-arms showed themselves
either on the walls or towers, the Macedonians were in
doubt whether the inhabitants had deserted the city, or
were hiding themselves to fall upon the enemy by surprise.
^ The better form of the name is
Sdphytes, which properly transliter-
ates the Sanskrit original Saubhutu^
but see Biographical Appendix, s.v.
Sophytes.
2 According to Strabo the inspec-
tion was made when the child was two
months old. He notices that the prac-
tice of widow-burning was known here.
220
THE INVASION OF INDIA
The gate, however, was on a sudden thrown open, and the
Indian king with two grown-up sons issued from it to meet
Alexander. He was distinguished above all the other
barbarians by his tall and handsome figure. His royal
robe, which flowed down to his very feet, was all inwrought
with gold and purple. His sandals were of gold and
studded with precious stones, and even his arms and
wrists were curiously adorned with pearls. At his ears
he wore pendants of precious stones which from their
lustre and magnitude were of an inestimable value. His
sceptre too was made of gold and set with beryls,^ and
this he delivered up to Alexander with an expression of
his wish that it might bring him good luck, and be accepted
as a token that he surrendered into his hands his children
and his kingdom.
His country possesses a noble breed of dogs, used for
hunting, and said to refrain from barking when they sight
their game which is chiefly the lion.^ Sopithes wishing to
show Alexander the strength and mettle of these dogs,
caused a very large lion to be placed within an enclosure
where four dogs in all were let loose upon him. The dogs
at once fastened upon the wild beast, when one of the
huntsmen who was accustomed to work of this kind tried
to pull away by the leg one of the dogs which with the
others had seized the lion, and when the limb would not
come away, cut it off with a knife. The dog could not
even by this means be forced to let go his hold, and so
the man proceeded to cut him in another place, and finding
him still clutching the lion as tenaciously as before, he con-
tinued cutting away with his knife one part of him after
another. The brave dog, however, even in dying kept his
fangs fixed in the lion's flesh ; so great is the eagerness for
* "The Indians," says Solinus
(c. S5)» "rub down the beryl into
hexagonal forms in order to impart
vigour to the dull tameness of the
colour by the reflection from the
angles. Of the beryl the varieties
are manifold." Pliny, from whom
Solinus no doubt drew this informa-
tion, states (xxxvii. 5) that beryls
were seldom found elsewhere than in
India, and that the Indians had dis-
covered how to make counterfeit
gems and especially beryls by stain-
ing crystal.
- See Note B<^, Indian Dogs.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
221
hunting which nature has implanted in these animals, as
testified by the accounts transmitted to us.
I must observe, however, that I copy from preceding
writers more than I myself believe, for I neither wish to
guarantee statements of the truth of which I am doubtful,
nor yet to suppress what I find recorded. Alexander
therefore leaving Sopithes in possession of his kingdom,
advanced to the river Hyphasis, where he was rejoined by
Hephaestion who had subdued a district situated in a
different direction. Phegeus,^ who was king of the nearest
nation, having beforehand ordered his subjects to attend
to the cultivation of their fields according to their wont,
went forth to meet Alexander with presents and assurances
that whatever he commanded he would not fail to perform.'
Chapter II. — Alexander obtains information about the
Ganges and the strength of the army kept by AgrammeSy
king of the Prasians — His speech to the soldiers to
induce them to advance to the Ganges
The king made a halt of two days with this prince,
designing on the third day to cross the river, the passage
of which was difficult, not only from its great breadth,
but also because its channel was obstructed with rocks.
Having therefore requested Phegeus to tell him what he
wanted to know, he learned the following particulars :
Beyond the river lay extensive deserts which it would
take eleven days to traverse.^ Next came the Ganges,
the largest river in all India, the farther bank of which
was inhabited by two nations, the Gangaridae and the
Prasii,^ whose king Agrammes ^ kept in the field for
1 The ordinary and correct read- places it is altogether uninhabited ;
ing is not Phegeus, as in the text from in others villages and patches of culti-
which I translate, but riiegelas, which vation are found thinly scattered,
transliterates the Sanskrit Bhagala. On the east it gradually gives way to
See Biog. Appendix, s.v. Phegelas. the fertile parts of India.
2 A sandy desert stretches from ^ For Gangaridae see Note Cc,
the southern borders of the Panjab and for Prasii, Note V>d. The
almost to the Gulf of Kachh. The common reading of this name in the
breadth of this desert from east to editions of Curtius is Pharasii.
west is about 400 miles. In some ^ The name as given here seems
222
THE INVASION OF INDIA
guarding the approaches to his country 20,000 cavalry
and 200,000 infantry, besides 2000 four-horsed chariots,
and, what was the most formidable force of all, a troop of
elephants which he said ran up to the number of 3000.
All this seemed to the king to be incredible, and he
therefore asked Porus, who happened to be in attendance,
whether the account was true. He assured Alexander in
reply that, as far as the strength of the nation and
kingdom was concerned, there was no exaggeration in the
reports, but that the present king was not merely a man
originally of no distinction, but even of the very meanest
condition. His father was in fact a barber, scarcely
staving off hunger by his daily earnings, but who, from
his being not uncomely in person, had gained the affections
of the queen, and was by her influence advanced to too
near a place in the confidence of the reigning monarch.
Afterwards, however, he treacherously murdered his sover-
eign ; and then, under the pretence of acting as guardian
to the royal children, usurped the supreme authority,
and having put the young princes to death begot the
present king, who was detested and held cheap by his
subjects, as he rather took after his father than conducted
himself as the occupant of a throne.
The attestation of Porus to the truth of what he had
heard made the king anxious on manifold grounds ; for
while he thought contemptuously of the men and elephants
that would oppose him, he dreaded the difficult nature of
the country that lay before him, and in particular, the
impetuous rapidity of the rivers. The task seemed
hard indeed, to follow up and unearth men removed
almost to the uttermost bounds of the world. On the
other hand, his avidity of glory and his insatiable ambition
forbade him to think that any place was so far distant or
inaccessible as to be beyond his reach. He did indeed
sometimes doubt whether the Macedonians who had
less correct than the form in Diod.
Xandrames^ which can be referred to
the Indian word Chandramas, mean-
ing moon-god. See Biog. Appendix,
s.w. Xandrames and Sandrokottos.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
223
traversed all those broad lands and grown old in battle-
fields and camps, would be willing to follow him through
obstructing rivers and the many other difficulties which
nature would oppose to their advance. Overflowing and
laden with booty, they would rather, he judged, enjoy
what they had won than wear themselves out in getting
more. They could not of course be of the same mind as
himself, for while he had grasped the conception of a
world-wide empire, and stood as yet but on the threshold
of his labours, they were now worn out with toil, and
longed for the time when, all their dangers being at length
ended, they might enjoy their latest winnings. In the
end ambition carried the day against reason ; and, having
summoned a meeting of the soldiers, he addressed them
very much to this effect :
" I am not ignorant, soldiers, that during these last
days the natives of this country have been spreading all
sorts of rumours designed expressly to work upon your
fears ; but the falsehood of those who invent such lies is
nothing new in your experience. The Persians in this
sort of way sought to terrify you with the gates of Cilicia,
with the plains of Mesopotamia, with the Tigris and
Euphrates, and yet this river you crossed by a ford, and
that by means of a bridge. Fame is never brought to a
clearness in which facts can be seen as they are. They
are all magnified when she transmits them. Even our
own glory, though resting on a solid basis, is more in-
debted for its greatness to rumour than to reality. Who
but till the other day believed that it was possible for us
to bear the shock of those monstrous beasts that looked
like so many ramparts, or that we could have passed the
Hydaspes, or conquered other difficulties which after all
were more formidable to hear of than they proved
to be in actual experience. By my troth we had long
ago fled from Asia could fables have been able to
scare us.
"Can you suppose that the herds of elephants are
greater than of other cattle when the animal is known to
224
THE INVASION OF INDIA
be rare, hard to be caught, and harder still to tame?^ It
is the same spirit of falsehood which magnifies the number
of horse and foot possessed by the enemy; and with respect
to the river, why, the wider it spreads the liker it becomes
to a placid pool. Rivers, as you know, that are confined
between narrow banks and choked by narrow channels
flow with torrent speed, while on the other hand the
current slackens as the channel widens out. Besides, all
the danger is at the bank where the enemy waits to
receive us as we disembark ; so that, be the breadth of
the river what it may, the danger is all the same when we
are in the act of landing. But let us suppose that these
stories are all true, is it then, I ask, the monstrous size of
the elephants or the number of the enemy that you dread ?
As for the elephants, we had an example of them before
our eyes in the late battle when they charged more
furiously upon their own ranks than upon ours, and when
their vast bodies were cut and mangled by our bills and
axes. What matters it then whether they be the same
number as Porus had, or be 3000, when we see that if
one or two of them be wounded, the rest swerve aside
and take to flight. Then again, if it be no easy task
to manage but a few of them, surely when so many
thousands of them are crowded together, they cannot
but hamper each other when their huge unwieldy bodies
want room either to stand or run. For myself, I have
such a poor opinion of the animals that, though I had
them, I did not bring them into the field, being fully con-
vinced they occasion more danger to their own side than
to the enemy.
"But it is the number, perhaps, of the horse and
foot that excites your fears ! for you have been wont, you
know, to fight only against small numbers, and will now
for the first time have to withstand undisciplined multi-
^ On the contrary, elephants are
easy to tame. Arrian in his Indica
(c. 13, 14) has described the manner
both of trapping and taming them.
The same methods are still employed,
with only slight variations. See also
Pliny, viii. 8-10; Diodoros, iii. 26;
Ailianos, viii. 10 and 15, and x. 10;
and Tzetzes, Chiliad^ iv. 122.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
225
tudes ! The river Granicus is a witness of the courage of
the Macedonians unconquered in fighting against odds ;^
so too is Cilicia deluged with the blood of the Persians,
and Arbela, where the plains are strewn with the bones of
your vanquished foes. It is too late, now that you have
depopulated Asia by your victories, to begin counting the
enemy's legions. When we were crossing the Hellespont,
it was then we should have thought about the smallness of
our numbers, for now Scythians follow us, Bactrian troops
are here to assist us, Dahans and Sogdians are serving in
our ranks. But it is not in such a throng I put my trust.
It is to your hands, Macedonians, I look. It is your
valour I take as the gage and surety of the deeds I mean
to perform.
" As long as it is with you I shall stand in battle, I
count not the number either of my own or the enemy's
army. Do ye only, I entreat, keep your minds full of
alacrity and confidence. We are not standing on the
threshold of our enterprise and our labours, but at their
very close. We have already reached the sunrise and
the ocean, and unless your sloth and cowardice prevent,
we shall thence return in triumph to our native land,
having conquered the earth to its remotest bounds. Act
not then like foolish husbandmen who, when their crops
are ripe, loose them out of hand from sheer indolence to
gather them. The prizes before you are greater than the
risks, for the country to be invaded not only teems with
wealth, but is at the same time feebly defended. So
then I lead you not so much to glory as to plunder.
You have earned the right to carry back to your own
country the riches which that sea casts upon its shores ;
and it would ill become you if through fear you should
leave anything unattempted or unperformed. I conjure
you then by that glory of yours whereby ye soar above
the topmost pinnacle of human greatness — I beseech you
^ There was no great disparity of 35,000 on Alexander's side and 40,000
numbers in the battle of the Granikos on the other,
between the Greeks and Persians,
226
THE INVASION OF INDIA
by my services unto you, and yours unto me (a strife in
which we still contend unconquered), that ye desert not
your foster-son, your fellow-soldier, not to say your king,
just at the moment when he is approaching the limits of
the inhabited world.
" All things else you have done at my orders — for this
one thing I shall hold myself to be your debtor. I, who
never ordered you upon any service in which I did not
place myself in the fore-front of the danger, I who have
often with mine own buckler covered you in battle, now
entreat you not to shatter the palm which is already
in my grasp, and by which, if I may so speak without
incurring the ill-will of heaven, I shall become the equal
of Hercules and Father Bacchus. Grant this to my
entreaties, and break at last your obstinate silence
Where is that familiar shout, the wonted token of your
alacrity? Where are the cheerful looks of my Mace-
donians ? I do not recognise you, soldiers, and, methinks,
I seem not to be recognised by you. I have all along
been knocking at deaf ears. I am trying to rouse hearts
that are disloyal and crushed with craven fears."
When the soldiers, with their heads bent earthwards,
still suppressed what they felt, " I must," he said, " have
inadvertently given you some offence that you will not
even look at me. Methinks I am in a solitude. No one
answers me ; no one so much as says me nay. Is it
to strangers I am speaking? Am I claiming anything
unreasonable ? Why, it is your glory and your greatness
we are asserting. Where are those whom but the other
day I saw eagerly striving which should have the pre-
rogative of receiving the person of their wounded king?
I am deserted, forsaken, surrendered into the hands of the
enemy. But I shall still persist in going forward, even
though I should march alone. Expose me then to the
dangers of rivers, to the rage of elephants, and to those
nations whose very names fill you with terror. I shall
find men that will follow me though I be deserted by
you. The Scythians and Bactrians, once our foemen,
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT 227
but now our soldiers — these will still be with me.^ Let
me tell you, I had die rather than be a commander on
sufferance. Begone then to your homes, and go triumph-
ing because ye have forsaken your king ! 2 For my part,
I shall here find a place, either for the victory of which
you despair, or for an honourable death."
Chapter III. — Speech of Coenus on behalf of the army —
Alexander's displeasm^e at the refusal of the soldiers
to advance — He resolves to return — Raises altars as
memorials of his presence — Reaches the Acesines,
wJicre Coenus dies — Reconciles Taxiles and Poms, and
then sails doivn stream
But not even by this appeal could a single word be
elicited from any of the soldiers. They waited for the
generals and chief captains to report to the king that the
men, exhausted with their wounds and incessant labours
in the field, did not refuse the duties of war, but were
simply unable to discharge them. The officers, however,
paralysed with terror, kept their eyes steadfastly fixed on
the ground, and remained silent. Then there arose, no
one knew how, first a sighing and then a sobbing, until,
little by little, their grief began to vent itself more freely
in streaming tears, so that even the king, whose anger
had been turned into pity, could not himself refrain from
tears, anxious though he was to suppress them. At last,
when the whole assembly had abandoned itself to an
unrestrained passion of weeping, Coenus, on finding that
the others were reluctant to open their lips, made bold to
^ So Caesar, when his soldiers, expedition with them alone, most
terrified by the accounts they had likely misrepresents the tone which
heard of the Germans, refused to he assumed.
advance against them, said, that if 2 Cerealis addressed his men in
nobody else would go with him he similar terms: "Go, tell Vespasian,
would set out with the Tenth Legion or Civilis and Classicus who are
alone {Bell. Gall. i. 40). Thirlwall nearer at hand, that you deserted
is of opinion that Alexander's threat your leader on the field of battle "
to throw himself on his Baktrian and (Tacitus, H. iv. 77).
Skythian auxiliaries, and make the
228
THE INVASION OF INDIA
step forward to the tribunal where the king stood, and
signified that he had somewhat to say. When the soldiers
saw him removing his helmet from his head — a custom
observed in addressing the king — they earnestly besought
him that he would plead the cause of the army.
" May the gods," he then said, " defend us from all
disloyal thoughts ; and assuredly they do thus defend us.
Your soldiers are now of the same mind towards you as
they ever were in times past, being re^dy to go wherever
you order them, ready to fight your battles, to risk their
lives, and to give your name in keeping to after ages.
So then, if you still persist in your purpose, all unarmed,
naked and bloodless though we be, we either follow you,
or go on before you, according to your pleasure. But if
you desire to hear the complaints of your soldiers, which
are not feigned, but wrung from them by the sorest
necessity, vouchsafe, I entreat you, a favourable hearing
to men who have most devotedly followed your authority
and your fortunes, and are ready to follow you wherever
you may go. Oh, sir ! you have conquered, by the great-
ness of your deeds, not your enemies alone, but your own
soldiers as well.
" Wc again have done and suffered up to the full
measure of the capacity of mortal nature. We have
traversed seas and lands, and know them better than do
the inhabitants themselves. We are standing now almost
on the earth's utmost verge, and yet you are preparing to
go to a sphere altogether new — to go in quest of an
India unknown even to the Indians themselves. You
would fain root out from their hidden recesses and dens
a race of men that herd with snakes and wild beasts, so
that you may traverse as a conqueror more regions than
the sun surveys. The thought is altogether worthy of a
soul so lofty as thine, but it is above ours ; for while thy
courage will be ever growing, our vigour is fast waning to
its end.
" See how bloodless be our bodies, pierced with how
many wounds, and gashed with how many scars ! Our
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
229
weapons are now blunt, our armour quite worn out. We
have been driven to assume the Persian garb since that
of our own country cannot be brought up to supply us.
We have degenerated so far as to adopt a foreign costume.
Among how many of us is there to be found a single coat
of mail ? Which of us has a horse ? Cause it to be
inquired how many have servants to follow them, how
much of his booty each one has now left. We have
conquered all the world, but are ourselves destitute of all
things. Can you think of exposing such a noble army
as this, all naked and defenceless, to the mercy of savage
beasts, whose numbers, though purposely exaggerated by
the barbarians, must yet, as I can gather from the lying
report itself, be very considerable. If, however, you are
bent on penetrating still farther into India, that part of it
which lies towards the south is not so vast, and were this
subdued you could then quickly find your way to that
sea which nature has ordained to be the boundary of the
inhabited world. Why do you make a long circuit in
pursuit of glory when it is placed immediately within
your reach, for even here the ocean is to be found.
Unless, then, you wish to go wandering about, we have
already reached the goal unto which your fortune leads
you. I have preferred to speak on these matters in your
presence, O King ! rather than to discuss them with the
soldiers in your absence, not that I have in view to gain
thereby for myself the good graces of the army here
assembled, but that you might learn their sentiments from
my lips rather than be obliged to hear their murmurs and
their groans." ^
^ " This speech, put into the mouth compose to suit the situation. The
of Coenus, has a peculiar literary remarkable parallels found in this
interest beyond the ordinary run of collection to the present speech of
orations written for their leading Curtius illustrates in a very striking
characters by the rhetorical historians way the artificial nature of these
of antiquit}'. In the remaining works harangues, and show what a vast
of the elder Seneca. -we have a suasorm amount of labour this spirited and
or hortatory oration (see Mayor on polished specimen probably took to
Juvenal, i. 16) on this very subject, produce. The corresponding speech
in which are arranged all the telhng in Arrian, v. 27, though less pointed
sentences that some of the most than that in Curtius, is more natural
famous Roman rhetoricians could and easy, and certainly far superior
230
THE INVASION OF INDIA
When Coenus had made an end of speaking there
arose from all parts of the audience assenting shouts,
mingled with lamentations and confused voices, calling
Alexander king, father, lord, and master. And now also
the other officers, especially the seniors, who from their
age possessed all the greater authority, and could with a
better grace beg to be excused from any more service,
united in making the same request. Alexander therefore
found himself unable either to rebuke them for their stub-
bornness or to appease their angry mood. Being thus
quite at a loss what to do, he leaped down from the
tribunal and shut himself up in the royal pavilion, into
which he forbade any one to be admitted except his
ordinary attendants. For two days he indulged his anger,
but on the third day he emerged from his seclusion, and
ordered twelve altars of square stone to be erected as a
monument of his expedition. He ordered also the forti-
fications around the camp to be drawn out wide, and
couches of a larger size than was required for men of
ordinary stature to be left, so that by making things
appear in magnificent proportions he might astonish
posterity by deceptive wonders.^
From this place he marched back the way he had
come, and encamped near the river Acesines. There
Coenus caught an illness, which carried him off." The
king was doubtless deeply grieved by his death, but yet
he could not forbear remarking that it was but for the
sake of a few days he had opened a long-winded speech
as though he alone were destined to see Macedonia again.
The fleet which he had ordered to be built was now rid-
ing in the stream ready for service. Memnon also had
meanwhile brought from Thrace a reinforcement of 5000
cavalry, together with 7000 infantry sent by Harpalus.
to that put into the mouth of Alex-
ander" {Alexander in India^ p. 140,
n. 5).
^ See Note N, Alexander's Altars
on the Ilyphasis.
- Curtius is here in error as to the
place of his death, for he died at the
Hydaspes, as will be seen by a refer-
ence to Arrian, vi. 2. He is further
in error, like Diodoros, in making the
fleet start on its voyage from the
Akesines instead of from the Hy-
daspes.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
231
He also brought 25,000 suits of armour inlaid with silver
and gold, and these Alexander distributed to the troops,
commanding the old suits to be burned.^ Designing now
to make for the ocean with a thousand ships, he left Porus
and Taxiles, the Indian kings who had been disagreeing
and raking up old feuds, in friendly relations with each
other, strengthened by a marriage alliance ; and as they
had done their utmost to help him forward with the build-
ing of his fleet, he confirmed each in his sovereignty. He
built also two towns, one of which he called Nicaea, and
the other Bucephala, dedicating the latter to the memory
of the horse which he had lost. Then leaving orders for
the elephants and baggage to follow him by land, he
sailed down the river, proceeding every day about 40
stadia, to allow the troops to land from time to time where
they could conveniently be put ashore. ^
^ " It is recorded," said Colonel
Chesney in his Simla lecture on
Alexander, * ' that he sent to Greece
for 20,000 fresh suits of armour. A
suit of armour and arms probably
weighed three - fourths of a maund
(60 lbs.), and we may assume that
with the arms a good many other
articles were indented for at the same
time. Altogether we may take it
that the requisition was for not less
than from 20,000 to 30,000 mule
loads — 30,000 laden mules to be
despatched from Macedonia to the
Satlej ! A large order. And this
suggests another consideration. Alex-
ander's army on the Satlej was 50,000
strong ; how about his lines of com-
munication ? During the late Afghan
war over 50,000 men crossed the
frontier, yet I believe the general had
never at any time more than 10,000
men in hand at the front ; the rest
were swallowed up in holding obliga-
tory posts and keeping up the line of
communication. Now if 40,000 men
are needed for this purpose to keep
10,000 effective in the front, when
the distance to be covered was only
200 miles, what would be the force
required to secure the line of com-
munication between Macedonia and
the army halted on the banks of the
Satlej ? The answer is to be found
in the system of war pursued by
Alexander's Greek generals, and
garrisons were left at certain points
on the road ; and where complete *
submission was made, the enemy was
left in possession of his country and
converted into an ally. But when
the resistance was obstinate Alex-
ander left no enemies behind." As
Alexander led into India 120,000
men. Colonel Chesney 's estimate that
he had only 50,000 at the Hyphasis
(which he calls the Satlej) must surely
be far below the mark.
2 Yet Pliny (vi. 17) says that
though Alexander sailed on the Indus
never less than 600 stadia per day,
he took more than five months to
complete the navigation of it ! This
would give the Indus a length of
12,000 miles ! Aristoboulos said the
navigation occupied ten months, but
we may strike off a month from this
estimate. The voyage began near
the end of October 326 B.C. The
distance from the starting-point to
the sea by the course of the river is
between eight and nine hundred
British miles.
232
THE INVASION OF INDIA
Chapter IV. — Alexander subdues various tribes on his waj/
to the Indus — Disasters to his fleet at the meeting of
the rivers — His campaign against the Sudracae and
Main — Assails their chief stronghold and is left
standing alone on the wall
Thus he came at length into the country where the
river Hydaspes falls into the Acesines, and thence flows
down to the territories of the Sibi.^ These people allege
that their ancestors belonged to the army of Hercules,
and that being left behind on account of sickness had
possessed themselves of the seats which their posterity
now occupied. They dressed themselves with the skins
of wild beasts, and had clubs for their weapons. They
showed besides many other traces of their origin, though
in the course of time Greek manners and institutions had
grown obsolete. He landed among them, and marching
a distance of 250 stadia into the country beyond their
borders, laid it waste, and took its capital town by an
assault made against the walls all round. The nation,
consisting of 40,000 foot-soldiers, had been drawn up
along the bank of the river to oppose his landing, but he
nevertheless crossed the stream, put the enemy to flight,
and, having stormed the town, compelled all who were
shut up within its walls to surrender. Those who were
of military age were put to the sword, and the rest were
sold as slaves.
He then laid siege to another town, but the defenders
made so gallant a resistance that he was repulsed with
the loss of many of his Macedonians.^ He persevered,
however, with the siege till the inhabitants, despairing of
their safety, set fire to their houses, and cast themselves
along with their wives and children into the flames.
War then showed itself in a new form, for while the
inhabitants were destroying their city by spreading the
flames, the enemy were striving to save it by quenching
1 See Note £<-, The Sibi. ^ ggg Note F/, The Agalassians.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
233
them, so completely does war invert natural relations.
The citadel of the town had escaped damage, and Alex-
ander accordingly left a garrison behind in it. He was
himself conveyed by means of boats around the fortress,
for the three largest rivers in India (if we except the
Ganges) washed the line of its fortifications. The Indus
on the north flows close up to it, and on the south the
Acesines unites with the Hydaspes.^
But the meeting of the rivers makes the waters swell
in great billows like those of the ocean, and the navigable
way is compressed into a narrow channel by extensive
mud-banks kept continually shifting by the force of the
confluent waters. When the waves, therefore, in thick
succession dashed against the vessels, beating both on
their prows and sides, the sailors were obliged to take in
sail ; but partly from their own flurry, and partly from
the force of the currents, they were unable to execute
their orders in time, and before the eyes of all two of the
large ships were engulphed in the stream. The smaller
craft, however, though they also were unmanageable,
were driven on shore without sustaining injury. The
ship which had the king himself on board was caught in
eddies of the greatest violence, and by their force was
irresistibly driven athwart and whirled onward without
answering the helm.
He had already stripped ofl* his clothes preparatory to
throwing himself into the river, while his friends were
swimming about not far ofl* ready to pick him up, but as
it was evident that the danger was about equal whether
he threw himself into the water or remained on board,
the boatmen vied with each other in stretching to their
oars, and made every exertion possible for human beings
to force their vessel through the raging surges. It then
seemed as though the waves were being cloven asunder.
^ Curtius has here confounded the
junction of the Hydaspes and Akesines
with that of the Indus and the com-
bined stream of the Panjab rivers.
The geography of the passage is in-
explicable. Arrian has given a vivid
description of the confluence, but
does not indicate that Alexander's
life was in danger from its perilous
navigation.
234
THE INVASION OF INDIA
and as though the whirling eddies were retreating, and the
ship was thus at length rescued from their grasp. It did
not, however, gain the shore in safety, but was stranded on
the nearest shallows. One would suppose that a war
had been waged against the river. Alexander there
erected as many altars as there were rivers, and having
offered sacrifices upon them marched onward, accomplish-
ing a distance of thirty stadia.
Thence he came into the dominions of the Sudracae
and the Malli, who hitherto had usually been at war with
each other, but now drew together in presence of the
common danger. Their army consisted of 90,000 foot-
soldiers, all fit for active service, together with 10,000
cavalry and 900 war chariots. But when the Mace-
donians, who believed that they had by this time got
past all their dangers, found that they had still on hand
a fresh war, in which the most warlike nations in all
India would be their antagonists, they were struck with
an unexpected terror, and began again to upbraid the
king in the language of sedition. " Though he had been
driven," they said, " to give up the river Ganges and
regions beyond it, he had not ended the war, but only
shifted it. They were now exposed to fierce nations
that with their blood they might open for him a way to
the ocean. They were dragged onward outside the range
of the constellations and the sun of their own zone, and
forced to go to places which nature meant to be hidden
from mortal eyes.^ New enemies were for ever spring-
ing up with arms ever new, and though they put them
all to rout and flight, what reward awaited them ? What
but mists and darkness and unbroken night hovering
over the abyss of ocean ? What but a sea teeming with
^ This rhetorical passage will re- wrapped in her pall of gloom, sits
mind the readers of Virgil of his brooding in unending silence." The
description of the zones {Georg. i. passage was probably, however,
231-251): " Five zones comprise the suggested by the lines of the sixth
heaven . . . of which two, the frozen book of the Aeneid, 794-796: "He
homes of green ice and black storms, (Augustus Caesar) will stretch his
stretch far away. . . . One pole is sway beyond Garamantian and Indian,
thrust down beneath the feet of murky See, the land is lying outside the
Styx . . . where eternal night, stars, outside the sun's yearly path."
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
235
multitudes of frightful monsters — stagnating waters in
which expiring nature has given way in despair ? " ^
The king, troubled not by any fears for himself, but
by the anxiety of the soldiers about their safety, called
them together, and pointed out to them that those of
whom they were afraid were weak and unwarlike ; that
after the conquest of these tribes there was nothing in
their way, once they had traversed the distance now
between them and the ocean, to prevent their coming to
the end of the world, which would be also the end of
their labours ; that he had given way to their fears of
the Ganges and of the numerous tribes beyond that
river, and turned his arms to a quarter where the glory
would be equal but the hazard less ; that they were
already in sight of the ocean, and were already fanned
by breezes from the sea.^ They should not then grudge
him the glory to which he aspired. They would over-
pass the limits reached by Hercules and Father Bacchus,
and thus at a small cost bestow upon their king an
immortality of fame. They should permit him to return
from India with honour, and not to escape from it like a
fugitive.
Every assemblage, and especially one of soldiers, is
readily carried away by any chance impulse, and hence
the measures for quelling a mutiny are less important
than the circumstances in which it originates. Never
before did so eager and joyous a shout ring out as was
now sent forth by the army asking him to lead them
forward, and expressing the hope that the gods would
prosper his arms and make him equal in glory to those
whom he was emulating. Alexander, elated by these
acclamations, at once broke up his camp and advanced
against the enemy, which was the strongest in point of
numbers of all the Indian tribes. They were making
active preparations for war, and had selected as their
1 ''Racine (^/^jr. v. i.), imitating iiature scmble eUe-mhne expirer''
the present passage, says : des deserts {Alex, in Ind. p. 148).
que le del refuse d'eclairer, oh la ^ From which they were yet some
600 miles distant !
236
THE INVASION OF INDIA
head a brave warrior of the nation of the Sudracae.^
This experienced general had encamped at the foot of a
mountain, and had ordered fires to be kindled over a
wide circuit to make his army appear so much the more
numerous. He endeavoured also at times, but in vain,
to alarm the Macedonians when at rest by making his
men shout and howl in their own barbarous manner.
As soon as day dawned, the king, full of hope and
confidence, ordered his soldiers, who were eager for action,
to take their arms and march to battle. The barbarians,
however, fled all of a sudden, but whether through fear
or dissensions that had arisen among them, there is no
record to show. At any rate, they escaped timeously to
their mountain recesses, which were difficult of approach.
The king pursued the fugitives, but to no purpose ; how-
ever, he took their baggage.
Thence he came into the city of the Sudracae, into
which most of the enemy had fled,^ trusting for safety as
much to their arms as to the strength of the fortifications.
The king was now advancing to attack the place, when
a soothsayer warned him not to undertake the siege, or
at all events to postpone it, since the omens indicated
that his life would be in danger. The king fixing his
eyes upon Demophon (for this was the name of the
soothsayer), said : " If any one should in this manner
interrupt thyself, while busied with thine art and inspect-
ing entrails, wouldst thou not regard him as impertinent
and troublesome ? " "I certainly would so regard him,"
said Demophon. Then rejoined Alexander, " Dost thou
not think then that when I am occupied with such import-
ant matters, and not with the inspection of the entrails of
^ Called the Oxydrakai by Arrian.
See Note P. Curtius here differs from
Diodoros, who says that the Syra-
kousai (Oxydrakai) and Malloi could
not agree as to the choice of a leader,
and ceased in consequence to keep
the field together. Both these his-
torians are silent as to the operations
conducted by Alexander during his
march from the junction of the
Hydaspes and the Akesines to the
capital of the Malloi situated above
the old junction of the united stream
of these two rivers with the Hydra-
otes.
- But according to Arrian, Strabo,
and Plutarch, the city where Alex-
ander was nearly wounded to death
belonged to the Malloi.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
'^n
cattle, there can be any interruption more unseasonable
to me than a soothsayer enslaved by superstition ? " ^
Without more loss of time than was required for return-
in^ the an-swer, he ordered the scaling-ladders to be
applied to the wall, and while the others were hesitating
to mount them, he himself scaled the ramparts.-
The parapet which ran round the rampart was narrow,
and was not marked out along the coping with battle-
ments and embrasures, but was built in an unbroken line
of breastwork, which obstructed assailants in attempting
to get over. The king then was clinging to the edge of
the parapet, rather than standing upon it, warding off
with his shield the darts that fell upon him from every
side, for he was assailed by missiles from all the surround-
ing towers. Nor were the soldiers able to mount the
wall under the storm of arrows discharged against them
from above.^ Still at last a sense of shame overcame their
fear of the greatness of the danger, for they saw that by
their hesitation the king would fall into the hands of
his enemies. But their help was delayed by their hurry,
for while every one strove to get soonest to the top of the
wall, they were precipitated from the ladders which they
overloaded till they broke, thus balking the king of^ his
only hope. He was in consequence left standing in sight
of his numerous army, like a man in a solitude, whom all
the world has forsaken.
1 Thirlwall, with good reason,
regards this incident as a mere eni-
bellishment of the story. "It is
certain," he says, "that even if
Alexander believed in such things
less than he appeals to have done, he
was too prudent to disclose his in-
credulity, and so throw away an
instrument which a Greek general
might so often find useful " {Hist,
of Greece, vii. c. 54). The story is
found in Diodoros also. If a fiction,
it may have been suggested by the
fact that Alexander on approaching
Babylon, where he died, was warned
by Chaldaean soothsayers not to enter
that city. If true, Alexander had
doubtless in his mind the words of
Hector {Iliad, xii. 237-243), where he
expresses his contempt for omens
drawn from the flight of birds. Hanni-
bal had a similar contempt, as appears
from Cicero, de Div. ii.
2 Curtius, like Plutarch, represents
Alexander to have been wounded
after he had scaled the city wall, and
thence leaped down into the city.
But this is a mistake. It was the wall of
the citadel he scaled, and it was within
the citadel he was wounded, as we
learn both from Arrian and Diodoros.
^ * ' Probably a piece of gratuitous
padding put in by Curtius to heighten
the effect of his picture. Nothing of
the kind is found in Arrian or Dio-
doros " {Alex, in India, p. 151).
238
THE INVASION OF INDIA
Chapter V. — Alexander is severely zvoiinded by an arrow
within the strongJiold of tJie Sndracac — TIic arrozu is
extracted by Critobulus
By this time his left hand, with which he was shifting
his buckler about, became tired with parrying the blows
directed against him from all round, and his friends cried
out to him that he should leap down, and were standing
ready to catch him when he fell. But instead of taking
this course, he did an act of daring past all belief and
unheard of — an act notable as adding far more to his
reputation for rashness than to his true glory. For with
a headlong spring he flung himself into the city filled
with his enemies, even though he could scarcely expect to
die fighting, since before he could rise from the ground
he was likely to be overpowered and taken prisoner.
But, as luck would have it, he had flung his body with
such nice poise that he alighted on his feet, which gave
him the advantage of an erect attitude when he began
fighting. Fortune had also so provided that he could
not possibly be surrounded, for an aged tree which grew
not far from the wall, had thrown out branches thickly
covered with leaves, as if for the very purpose of shelter-
ing the king. Against the huge bole of this tree he so
planted himself that he could not be surrounded, and as
he was thus protected in rear, he received on his buckler
the darts with which he was assailed in front ; for single-
handed though he was, not one of the many who set
upon him ventured to come to close-quarters with him,
and their missiles lodged more frequently in the branches
of the tree than in his buckler.
What served him well at this juncture was the far-
spread renown of his name, and next to that despair,
which above everything nerves men to die gloriously.
But as the numbers of the enemy were constantly
increasing, his buckler was by this time loaded with
darts, and his helmet shattered by stones, while his knees
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
239
sank under him from the fatigue of his protracted
exertions. On seeing this, they who stood nearest
incautiously rushed upon him in contempt of the danger.
Two of these he smote with his sword, and laid them
dead at his feet, and after that no one could muster up
courage enough to go near him. They only plied him
with darts and arrows from a distance off
But though thus exposed as a mark for every shot, he
had no great difficulty in protecting himself while crouch-
ing on his knees, until an Indian let fly an arrow two
cubits long (for the Indians, as remarked already, use
arrows of this length), and pierced him through his
armour a little above his right side. Struck down by
this wound, from which the blood spirted in great jets,
he let his weapon drop as if he were dying without
strength enough left to let his right hand extract the
arrow. The archer, accordingly, who had wounded him,
exulting in his success, ran forward with eager haste to
strip his body. But Alexander no sooner felt him lay
hands on his person, than he became so exasperated by
the supreme indignity, I imagine, of the outrage, that he
recalled his. swooning spirit, and with an upward thrust
of his sword pierced the exposed side of his antagonist.
Thus there lay dead around the king three of his assail-
ants, while the others stood off like men stupefied.
Meanwhile he endeavoured to raise himself up with
his buckler, that he might die sword in hand, before his
last breath left him, but finding he had not strength
enough for the effort, he grasped with his right hand some
of the defending boughs, and tried to rise with their help.
His strength was, however, inadequate even to support
his body, and he fell down again upon his knees, waving
his hand as a challenge to the enemy to meet him in close
combat if any of them dared. At length Peucestas in a
different quarter of the town beat off the men who were
defending the wall, and following the king's traces came
to where he was. Alexander on seeing him thought that
he had come not to succour him in life, but to comfort him
240
THE INVASION OF INDIA
in his death, and giving way through sheer exhaustion,
fell over on his shield.
Then came up Timaeus, and a little afterwards
Leonnatus followed by Aristonus.^ The Indians, on
discovering that the king was within their walls, abandoned
all other places and ran in crowds to where he was, and
pressed hard upon those who defended him. Timaeus,
one of such, after receiving many wounds and making a
gallant struggle, fell. Peucestas again, though pierced
with three javelin wounds, held up his buckler not for
his own, but the king's protection. Leonnatus, while
endeavouring to drive back the barbarians who -were
eagerly pressing forward, was severely wounded in the
neck, and fell down in a swoon at the king's feet.
Peucestas was also now quite exhausted with the loss of
blood from his wounds and could no longer hold up his
buckler. Thus all the hope now lay in Aristonus, but he
also was desperately wounded, and could no longer sustain
the onset of so many assailants. In the meantime the
rumour that the king had fallen reached the Macedonians.
What would have terrified others only served to
stimulate their ardour, for, heedless of every danger, they
broke down the wall with their pickaxes, and where they
had made an entrance burst into the city and massacred
great numbers of the Indians, chiefly in the pursuit, no
resistance being offered except by a mere handful. They
spared neither old men, women, nor children, but held
whomsoever they met to have been the person by whom
the king had been wounded, and in this way they at
length satiated their righteous indignation.
Clitarchus and Timagenes state that Ptolemy, who
afterwards became a king, was present at this fighting, but
Ptolemy himself, who would not of course gainsay his
own glory, has recorded in his memoirs that he was away
at the time, as the king had sent him on an expedition
^ Timaeus and Aristonus are men-
tioned only by Curtius as among
those who came first to Alexander's
rescue. It is supposed that the Tim-
aeus of Curtius is the same person as
the Limnaios of Plutarch.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
241
elsewhere. This instance shows how great was the
carelessness of the authors who composed these old books
of history, or, it may be, their credulity, which is just as
great a dereliction of their duty. The king was carried
into a tent, where the surgeons cut off the w^ooden shaft of
the arrow which had pierced him, taking care not to stir
its point. When his armour was taken off they discovered
that the weapon was barbed, and that it could not be
extracted without danger except by making an incision to
open the wound. But here again they were afraid lest in
operating they should be unable to staunch the flow of
blood, for the weapon was large and had been driven
home with such force that it had evidently pierced to the
inwards.
Critobulus, who was famous for his surgical skill,^ was
nevertheless swayed by fear in a case so precarious, and
dreaded to put his hand to the work lest his failure to
effect a cure should recoil on his own head. The king
observing him to weep, and to be showing signs of fear, and
looking ghastly pale, said to him : " For what and how
long are you waiting that you do not set to work as quickly
as possible ? If die I must, free me at least from the pain
I suffer. Are you afraid lest you should be held to account
because I have received an incurable wound ?" Then Crito-
bulus, at last overcoming, or perhaps dissembling his fear,
begged Alexander to suffer himself to be held while he
was extracting the point, since even a slight motion of his
body would be of dangerous consequence. To this the
king replied that there was no need of men to hold him,
and then, agreeably to what had been enjoined him, he
did not wince the least during the operation.-
When the wound had then been laid wide open and
the point extracted, there followed such a copious discharge
1 Pliny (vii. 37) mentions a Crito- ander's case to Kritodemos, a physi-
bulus who acquired great celebrity by cian of Kos, but others to Perdikkas.
extracting an arrow from the eye of ^ go Marius in like circumstances
Philip, Alexander's father. Arrian forbade himself to be bound (Cicero,
again says that some authors assigned 71?/^^. Disput. ii. 22).
the credit of the operation in Alex-
R
242
THE INVASION OF INDIA
of blood that the king began to swoon, while a dark mist
came over his eyes, and he lay extended as if he were
dying. Every remedy was applied to staunch the blood,
but all to no purpose, so that the king's friends, believing
him to be dead, broke out into cries and lamentations.
The bleeding did, however, at last stop, and the patient
gradually recovered consciousness and began to recognise
those who stood around him. All that day and the night
which followed the army lay under arms around the royal
tent. All of them confessed that their life depended on
his single breath, and they could not be prevailed on to
withdraw until they had ascertained that he had /alien
into a quiet sleep. Thereupon they returned to the camp
entertaining more assured hopes of his recovery.
Chapter VI. — Alexander recovers and shows himself to the
army — His officers remotistrate with him for his
recklessness in exposing his life to danger — His reply
to their appeal
The king, who had now been kept for the space of
seven days under treatment for his wound without its
being as yet cicatrised, on hearing that a report of his
death had gained a wide currency among the barbarians,
caused two ships to be lashed together and his tent to be
set up in the centre where it would be conspicuous to
every one, so that he might therefrom show himself to
those who believed him to be dead. By thus exposing
himself to the view of the inhabitants he crushed the hope
with which the false report had inspired his enemies. He
then sailed down the river,^ starting a good while before
the rest of the fleet, lest the repose which his weak bodily
condition still required should be disturbed by the noise
of rowing. On the fourth day after he had embarked he
reached a country deserted by its inhabitants, but fruitful
The Hydraotes or Ravi, which in those days joined the Akesines below Multan.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
243
in corn and well stocked with cattle. Here along with
his soldiers he enjoyed a welcome season of rest.
Now it was a custom among the Macedonians that the
king's especial friends and those who had the guard of his
person watched before his tent during any occasional
illness. This custom being now observed as usual,
they all entered his chamber in a body. Alexander
fearing they might be the bearers of some bad news, since
they had all come together, enquired whether they had
come to inform him that the enemy had that moment
arrived. Then Craterus, who had been chosen by the
others as their medium to let the king know the entreaties
of his friends, addressed him in these terms : " Can you
imagine," he began, " that we could be more alarmed by
the enemy's approach, even if they were already within our
lines, than we are concerned for your personal safety, by
which, it seems, you set but little store ? Were the
united powers of the whole world to conspire against us,
were they to cover the land all over with arms and men,
to cover the seas with fleets, and lead ferocious wild
beasts against us, we shall prove invincible to every foe
when we have you to lead us. But which of the gods
can ensure that this the stay and star of Macedonia will
be long preserved to us when you are so forward to
expose your person to manifest dangers, forgetting that
you draw into peril the lives of so many of your country-
men ? For which of us wishes to survive you, or even has
it within his power ? Under your conduct and command
we have advanced so far that there is no one but yourself
who can lead us back to our hearths and homes.
" No doubt while you were still contending with
Darius for the sovereignty of Persia, one could not even
think it strange (though no one wished it) that you were
ever ready and eager to rush boldly into danger, for
where the risk and the reward are fairly balanced, the
gain is not only more ample in case of success, but the
solace is greater in case of defeat. But that your very
life should be paid as the price of an obscure village,
244
THE INVASION OF INDIA
which of your soldiers, nay, what inhabitant of any
barbarous country that has heard of your greatness can
tolerate such an idea? My soul is struck with horror
when I think of the scene which was lately presented to
our eyes.
" I cannot but tremble to relate that the hands of the
greatest dastards would have polluted the spoils stripped
from the invincible Alexander, had not fortune, looking
with pity on us, interfered for your deliverance. We are
no better than traitors, no better than deserters, all of us
who were unable to keep up with you when you ran into
danger ; and should you therefore brand us all with
dishonour, none of us will refuse to give satisfaction for
that from the guilt of which he could not secure him-
self. Show us, we beseech you then, in some other
way, how cheap you hold us. We are ready to go
wherever you order. We solicit that for us you reserve
obscure dangers and inglorious battles, while you save
yourself for those occasions which give scope for your
greatness. Glory won in a contest with inferior opponents
soon becomes stale, and nothing can be more absurd than
to let your valour be wasted where it cannot be displayed
to view."
Ptolemy and others who were present addressed him
in the same or similar terms, and all of them, as one man,
besought him with tears that, sated as he was with glory,
he would at last set some limits to that passion and
have more regard for his own safety, on which that of the
public depended. The affection and loyalty of his friends
were so gratifying to the king that he embraced them one
by one with more than his usual warmth, and requested
them all to be seated.^
Then, in addressing them, he went far back in a review
of his career and said : " I return you, most faithful and
most dutiful subjects and friends, my most heartfelt thanks,
not only because you at this time prefer my safety to
^ Arrian, on the contrary, states, Alexander was annoyed by the re-
on the authority of Nearchos, that monstrances of his friends.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
245
your own, but also because from the very outset of the
war you have lost no opportunity of showing by every
pledge and token your kindly feelings towards myself, so
that I must confess my life has never been so dear to me
as it is at present, and chiefly so, that I may long enjoy
your companionship. At the same time, I must point
out that those who are willing to lay down their lives for
me do not look at the matter from my point of view,
inasmuch as I judge myself to have deserved by my
bravery your favourable inclinations towards me, for you
may possibly be coveting to reap the fruit of my favour
for a great length of time, perhaps even in perpetuity, but
I measure myself not by the span of age, but by that of
glory.
'* Had I been contented with my paternal heritage,
I might have spent my days within the bounds of
Macedonia, in slothful ease, to an obscure and inglorious
old age ; although even those who remain indolently at
home are not masters of their own destiny, for while they
consider a long life to be the supreme good, an untimely
death often takes them by surprise. I, however, who do
not count my years but by my victories, have already had
a long career of life, if I reckon aright the gifts of fortune.
Having begun to reign in Macedonia, I now hold the
supremacy of Greece. I have subdued Thrace and the
people of Illyria ; I give laws to the Triballi and the
Maedi,^ and am master of Asia from the shores of Helles-
pont as far south as the shores of the Indian Ocean.
And now I am not far from the very ends of the earth,
which when I have passed I purpose to open up to
myself a new realm of nature — a new world. In the
turning-point of a single hour I crossed over from Asia
into the borders of Europe.^ Having conquered both
these continents in the ninth year of my reign, and in my
twenty-eighth year, do you think I can pause in the task
1 A Thracian tribe whose country ^ That is when he crossed the
is mentioned in Ptolemy's Geography Tanais (Jaxartes) to attack the Sky-
as a strategia—\\\^\. is, a province thians. " Unus Pellaeo juveni non
governed by a general of the army. sufficit orbis."
H
246
THE INVASION OF INDIA
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
247
of completing my glory, to which, and to which only, I
have entirely devoted myself? No, I shall not fail in my
duty to her, and wheresoever I shall be fighting I shall
imagine myself on the world's theatre, with all mankind
for spectators. I shall give celebrity to places before
unnoted. I shall open up for all nations a way to regions
which nature has hitherto kept far distant.
" If fortune shall so direct that in the midst of these
enterprises my life be cut short, that would only add to
my renown. I am sprung from such a stock that I am
bound to prefer living much to living long.^ Reflect, I
pray you, that we have come to lands in the eyes of
which the name of a woman is the most famed for valour.
What cities did Semiramis build ! What nations did she
bring to subjection ! What mighty works did she plan !
We have not yet equalled the glorious achievements of a
woman, and have we already had our fill of glory ? No,
I say. Let the gods, however, but favour us, and things
still greater remain for us yet to do. But the countries
we have not yet reached shall only become ours on condi-
tion that we consider nothing little in which there is room
for great glory to be won. Do you but defend me
against domestic treason and the plots of my own house-
hold,^ and I will fearlessly face the dangers of battle and
war.
" Philip was safer in the field of fight than in the
theatre. He often escaped the hands of his enemies — he
could not elude those of his subjects.^ And if you
examine how other kings also came by their end, you can
count more that were slain by their own people than by
their enemies. But now lastly, since an opportunity has
presented itself to me of disclosing a matter which I have
^ Referring to his descent from
Achilleus, whose career was short but
glorious.
- Alexander here refers to the plot
of Hermolaos and the pages against
his life.
^ Philip was assassinated by Pau-
sanias while entering the door of a
theatre. The Elzevir editor aptly
quotes an epigram on Henry IV. of
France, to whom a saying was attri-
buted Duo protegit unus :
" Gallorum Rex regna, inquis, duo protegit
unus ;
Protexere tuum nee duo regna caput."
for a long time been turning over and over in my mind, I
give you to understand that to me the greatest rewards of
all my toils and achievements will be this, that my mother
Olympias shall be deified as soon as she departs this life.
If I be spared, I shall myself discharge that duty, but if
death anticipate me, bear in memory that I have entrusted
this office to you." With these words he dismissed his
friends ; but for a good many days he remained in the
same encampment.
Chapter VII . — The affair of Bit on and Boxiis at Baktra —
Embassy from the Sudracae and M alii proffering sub-
mission — Alexander entertains his army and the
embassy at a sumptuous baiiquet — Single combat
between a Macedonian and an Athenian champion
While these things were doing in India, the Greek
soldiers who had been recently drafted by the king into
settlements around Bactra disagreed among themselves
and revolted, for the stronger faction, having killed some
of their countrymen who remained loyal, had recourse to
arms, and making themselves masters of the citadel of
Bactra, which happened to be carelessly guarded, forced
even the barbarians to join their party. Their leader was
Athenodorus, who had also assumed the title of king, not
so much from an ambition to reign as from a wish to
return to his native country along with those who acknow-
ledged his authority. Against his life one Biton, a citizen
of the same Greek state as himself, but who hated him
from envy, laid a plot, and having invited him to a
banquet, had him assassinated during the festivities by
the hands of a native of Margiana called Boxus. The
day following Biton, in a general meeting which had been
convoked, persuaded the majority that Athenodorus had
without any provocation formed a plot to take away his
life. Others, however, suspected there had been foul play
on Biton's part, and by degrees this suspicion spread itself
248
THE INVASION OF INDIA
about among the rest. The Greek soldiers, therefore,
took up arms to put Biton to death should an opportunity-
present itself.
But the leading men appeased the anger of the multi-
tude, and Biton being thus freed from his imminent
danger, contrary to what he had anticipated, soon after-
wards conspired against the very man to whom he owed
his safety. But when his treachery came to their knowledge
they seized both Biton himself and Boxus. The latter
they ordered to be at once put to death, but Biton not till
after he had undergone torture. The instruments for this
purpose were already being applied to his limbs when the
soldiers, it is not known why, ran to their arms like so
many madmen. On hearing the uproar they made, the
men who had orders to torture Biton desisted from their
office, thinking that the object of the rioters, whom they
had heard shouting, was to prevent them going on with
their work. Biton, stripped as he was, ran for protection
to the Greeks, and the sight of the wretched man sen-
tenced to death caused such a revulsion of their feelings
that they ordered him to be set at liberty. Having twice
escaped punishment, he returned to his native country
with the rest of those who left the colonies which the king
had assigned to them.^ These things were done about
Bactra and the borders of Scythia.
In the meantime a hundred ambassadors came to the
king from the two nations we have before mentioned.^
They all rode in chariots and were men of uncommon
stature and of a very dignified bearing. Their robes
were of linen and embroidered with inwrought gold and
purple. They informed him that they surrendered into
his hands themselves, their cities, and their territories,
and that he was the first to whose authority and protection
^ The incident is mentioned briefly
by Diodoros (xvii. 99). The 3000
Greeks who left their colonies to
return home suffered great hardships
on the way, and were slain by the
Macedonians after Alexander's death.
2 The Sudracae and the Malli.
They arrived while Alexander was
still in camp near the confluence of
the Hydraotes with the Akesines,
where he had joined Hephaistion and
Nearchos.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
249
they had intrusted their liberty which for so many ages
they had preserved inviolate. The gods, they said, were
the authors of their submission and not fear, seeing that
they had submitted to his yoke while their strength was
quite unbroken. The king at a meeting of his council
accepted their proffer of submission and allegiance, and
imposed on them the tribute which the two nations paid
in instalments to the Arachosians.^ He further ordered
them to furnish him with 2500 horsemen, all which com-
mands were faithfully carried out by the barbarians.
After this he gave orders for the preparation of a splendid
banquet to which he invited the ambassadors and the petty
kings of the neighbouring tribes. Here a hundred couches
of gold had been placed at a small distance from each other,
and these were hung round with tapestry curtains which
glittered with gold and purple. In a word he displayed
at this entertainment all that was corrupt in the ancient
luxury of the Persians as well as in the new-fangled fashions
which had been adopted by the Macedonians, thus inter-
mixing the vices of both nations.
At this banquet there was present Dioxippus the
Athenian, a famous boxer,- who on account of his surprising
strength was already well known to the king, and one even
of his favourites. Some there were who from envy and
malice used to carp at him between jest and earnest,
remarking they had a full-fed good-for-nothing beast in
their company, who when others went forth to fight would
rub himself with oil and take exercise to get up his
appetite. Now at the banquet a Macedonian called
Horrcxtus, who was by this time " flown with wine," began
to taunt him in the usual style, and challenged him, if he
1 A statement, as Thirlwall ob-
serves, hardly consistent either with
the boasts of independence made by
the two nations, or with their recorded
actions.
2 Athenaios (vi. 13) relates, on the
authority of Aristoboulos, that this
Dioxippos, the Athenian, whom he
calls a pankratiast, when Alexander
on a certain occasion was wounded,
and the blood flowing, exclaimed :
"This is ichor such as flows in the
veins of the blessed gods. " Ailianos
in his Hist. Var. (x. 22) describes his
combat with the Macedonian. Pliny
(xxxv. II) informs us that Dioxippos
was painted as a victor in the Olympic
pancratium by Aleimachus.
2;o
THE INVASION OF INDIA
were a man, to fight him next day with his sword, after
which the king would judge of his temerity or of the
cowardice of Dioxippus. The terms of the challenge
were accepted by Dioxippus, who treated with contempt
the bravado of the insolent soldier. The king finding
next day that the two men were more than ever bent on
fighting, and that he could not dissuade them, allowed
them to do as they pleased. The soldiers came in crowds
to witness the affair, and among others Greeks who backed
up Dioxippus.^
The Macedonian came with the proper arms, carrying
in his left hand a brazen shield and the long spear called
the sarissa, and in his right a javelin. He wore also a
sword by his side as if he meant to fight with several
opponents at once. Dioxippus again entered the ring
shining with oil, wearing a garland about his brows,
having a scarlet cloak wrapped about his left arm, and
carrying in his right hand a stout knotty club. This
singular mode of equipment kept all the spectators for a
time in suspense, because it seemed not temerity but
downright madness for a naked man to engage with one
armed to the teeth. The Macedonian accordingly, not
doubting for a moment but that he could kill his adversary
from a distance, cast his javelin at him, but this Dioxippus
avoided by a slight bending of his body, and before the
other could shift the long pike to his right hand, sprang
upon him and broke the weapon in two by a stroke of
his club. The Macedonian, having thus lost two of his
weapons, prepared to draw his sword, but Dioxippus closed
with him before he was ready to wield it, and suddenly
tripping up his heels, knocked him down as with a blow
from a battering-ram. He then wrested his sword from
his grasp, planted his foot on his neck as he lay prostrate.
^ It is uncertain whether the Mace-
donians were of the same blood as the
Greeks. Their kings undoubtedly
were, but Grote, influenced by his
antipathy to Alexander, who had
crushed the liberties ot Greece, con-
sidered him little better than a bar-
barian, "who had at most put on
some superficial varnish of Hellenic
culture. " See on this point Freeman's
Historical Essays y vol. ii. pp. 192-201,
3rd ed.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
251
and brandishing his club would have brained him with it,
had he not been prevented by the king.
The result of the match was mortifying not only to the
Macedonians, but even to Alexander himself, for he saw
with vexation that the vaunted bravery of the Mace-
donians had fallen into contempt with the barbarians who
attended the spectacle. This made the king lend his ear
all too readily to the accusations of those who owed
Dioxippus a grudge. So at a feast which he attended a few
days afterwards a golden bowl was by a private arrange-
ment secretly taken off the table, and the attendants went
to the king to complain of the loss of the article which
they themselves had hidden. It often enough happens
that one who blushes at a false insinuation has less con-
trol of his countenance than one who is really guilty.
Dioxippus could not bear the glances which were turned
upon him as if he were the thief, and so when he had left
the banquet he wrote a letter which he addressed to the
king, and then killed himself with his sword. The king
took his death much to heart, judging that the man had
killed himself from sheer indignation, and not from remorse
of conscience, especially since the intemperate joy of his
enemies made it clear that he had been falsely accused.
Chapter VIII. — Alexander receives the submission of the
Main — Invades the Music ani and the Praesti, wJiose
kingPorticanusis slain — Hciicxt attacks King Savibus^
many of whose cities surrendered — Musicanus having
revolted is captured and executed — Ptolemy is ivoujided
by a poisoned arrow in the kingdom of Sambus, but
recovers — Alexander readies Patala and sails down
the Indus
The Indian ambassadors were dismissed to their several
homes, but in a few days they returned with presents for
Alexander which consisted of 300 horsemen, 1030 chariots
each drawn by four horses, 1000 Indian bucklers, a great
252
THE INVASION OF INDIA
quantity of linen-cloth, 100 talents of steel/ some tame
lions and tigers of extraordinary size, the skins also of
very large lizards, and a quantity of tortoise shells.^ The
king commanding Craterus to move forward in advance
with his troops and to keep always near the river, down
which he intended himself to sail, took ship along with his
usual retinue, and dropping down stream came to the
territories of the Malli.^ Thence he marched towards the
Sabarcae,^ a powerful Indian tribe where the form of
government was democratic and not regal. Their army
consisted of 60,000 foot and 6000 cavalry attended by
500 chariots.
They had elected three generals ren'b^ned for their
valour and military skill ; but when those who lived near
the river, the banks of which were most thickly studded
with their villages,^ saw the whole river as far as the eye
could reach covered with ships, and saw besides the many
thousands of men and their gleaming arms, they took
fright at the strange spectacle and imagined that an army
of the gods and a second Father Bacchus, a name famous
in that country, were coming into their midst. The
shouts of the soldiers and the noise of the oars, together
with the confused voices of the sailors encouraging each
^ *' The sword blades of India had
a great fame over the East, and Indian
steel, according to esteemed authori-
ties, continued to be imported into
Persia till days quite recent. Its fame
goes back to very old times. Ktesias
mentions two wonderful swords of
such material that he got from the
King of Persia and his mother. It is
perhaps iheferntm candidum of which
the Malli and Oxydracae sent 100
talents' weight as a present to Alex-
ander. Indian iron and steel are
mentioned in the Peripliis as im-
ports into the Abyssinian ports." See
Yule's Marco Polo, i. p. 94.
- We learn from the Periplus of
the Erythraean Sea that tortoise and
other shells formed an important
element in the ancient commerce of
the East with the West. For an
account of Indian shells see British
India of the Edinburgh Cabinet
Library, III. c. v. pp. 136-144.
^ Alexander had, however, by this
time taken their capital. We learn
from Arrian {Indika, c. 4) that their
dominions extended to the junction of
the Akesines with the Indus.
* Lassen identifies this people with
the Sambastai of Diodoros. Orosius
calls them the Sabagrae. In Arrian
the 6Vz/«3aj'/d.
282
THE INVASION OF INDIA
an army of 20,000 horse, 200,000 infantry, 2000 chariots,
and 4000 elephants trained and equipped for war.
Alexander, distrusting these statements, sent for Poros
and questioned him as to their accuracy. Poros assured
him of the correctness of the information, but added that
the king of the Gandaridai was a man of quite worthless
character, and held in no respect, as he was thought to be
the son of a barber.^ This man — the king's father — was
of a comely person, and of him the queen had become
deeply enamoured. The old king having been treacher-
ously murdered by his wife, the succession had devolved
on him who now reigned. Alexander, though sensible of
the difficulties which would attend an expedition against
the Gandaridai, had nevertheless no thought of swerving
from the path of his ambition, but having in his favour
the courage of the Macedonians and the responses of the
oracles, he was buoyed up with the hope that he would
conquer the barbarians, for had not the Pythian priestess
pronounced him invincible, and had not Ammon promised
him the dominion of the whole world ? ^
Chapter XCIV. — Miserable condition of the Macedonian
army — Its refusal to advance beyond the Hypanis
He saw, however, that his soldiers were dispirited by
interminable campaigns, and by their exposure for nearly
eight years to toils and dangers reduced to a condition
of the utmost misery, and he therefore conceived it was
^ The Indian barber {ndpit) be-
longed to the Sudra or servile caste.
Besides the duties proper to his call-
ing, he has other avocations, his
services being often required for the
performance of certain domestic cere-
monies such as those connected with
marriage, etc.
2 " Kallisthenes adds (after the
exaggerating style of tragedy) that
when Apollo had deserted the oracle
among the Branchidai, on the temple
being plundered by the Branchidai
(who espoused the party of the
Persians in the time of Xerxes), and
the spring had failed, it then re-
appeared on the arrival of Alexander ;
that the ambassadors also of the
Milesians carried back to Memphis
numerous answers of the oracle
respecting the descent of Alexander
from Jupiter, and the future victory
which he should obtain at Arbela, the
death of Darius, and the poHtical
changes at Lacedaemon " (Strabo,
XVII. i. 43). See also Introd. p. 28.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
283
necessary for him to animate his troops for the expedition
against the Gandaridai ^ by plying them with suitable
arguments. For death had made severe ravages in his
ranks, and all hope was gone that his wars would ever
come to an end. Then their horses' hoofs had been worn
off by ceaseless marches, and their weapons worn out by
use. The Hellenic costumes again were by this time
threadbare and could not be replaced, and hence the men
were obliged to use cloth woven in barbaric looms where-
with to cut out such dresses for themselves as were worn
by Indians. It also so happened that violent storms of
rain burst from the clouds for the space of seventy days,
accompanied with continual outbreaks of thunder and
lightning. Alexander, considering this state of things an
obstacle to his designs, placed all his hopes of gaining his
ends on winning by benefactions the hearty support of his
soldiers. Accordingly he allowed them to plunder the
enemy's country where supplies of all sorts abounded, and
on those days when the army was busily engaged in
foraging he called together the soldiers' wives and children,
and then promised to give the women an allowance of
food month by month, and the children a donative accord-
ing to the calculations of what their fathers received as
the pay of their military rank. When the soldiers who
had found a rich and ample booty returned to the camp,
he gathered them all together, and in a well-weighed
speech addressed the assembly on the subject of the
expedition against the Gandaridai ; but when the Mace-
donians would by no means assent to his proposals he
renounced his contemplated enterprise.
CJiapter XCV. — Alexander erects altars and other memorials
near the Hypanis, and returns to the Akesines
He then resolved to set up marks to indicate the
limits to which he had advanced ; so first of all he built
1 Properly the Gangaridai.
284
THE INVASION OF INDIA
altars to the twelve gods of 50 cubits in height. Having
next enclosed an encampment thrice the size of the one he
occupied, he dug round it a trench 50 feet broad and 40
feet deep, and with the earth cast up from this trench
he erected a rampart of extraordinary dimensions. He
further ordered quarters to be constructed as for foot-
soldiers, each containing two beds 5 cubits in length for
each man, and besides this accommodation, two stalls of
twice the ordinary size for each horseman. Whatever
else was to be left behind was directed to be likewise
proportionately increased in size. His object in all this
was not merely to make a camp as for heroes, but at the
same time to leave among the people of the country
tokens of mighty men to show with what enormous
bodily strength they were endowed. When these works
were finished he retraced his steps with all his army to
the river Akesines.^ On reaching it he found that the
boats had been built, and when he had rigged these out,
he ordered an additional number to be constructed. At
this time there arrived from Greece allies and mercenaries
led by the generals in command of the allies, amounting
to more than 30,000 foot and not much less than 6000
cavalry. Splendid full suits of armour besides were
brought for the infantry to the number of 25,000," and
TOO talents of medicinal drugs, all which he distributed
among the soldiers. When the equipment of the fleet
was finished, and 200 boats without hatches and 800
tenders had been got ready, he proceeded to give names
to the cities which had been founded on the banks of the
river, calling one Nikaia in commemoration of his victory,
and the other Boukephala after his horse that perished
in the battle with Poros.
1 Diodoros should have said the Hy dashes, ' See Note on Curtius, p. 231.
BY ALEXANDER THE GREAT
285
Chapter XC VI. — Voyage to the Southern Ocean begun —
Submission of the Siboi — Tlie Agalassians attacked
and conquered
Alexander now embarked with his friends, and started
on the voyage to the Southern Ocean. The bulk of the
army simultaneously marched along the banks of the
river under the command of Krateros and Hephaistion.
On coming to the place where the Akesines and Hydaspes
join each other the king landed his troops, and led them
against a people called the Siboi. These, it is said, were
descended from the soldiers who, under Herakles, attacked
the rock Aornos, and after failing to capture it were
settled by him in this part of the country. Alexander
encamped near their capital, and thereupon the citizens
who filled the highest offices came forth to meet him,
and reminded him how they were connected by the ties
of a common origin. They avowed themselves to be, in
virtue of their kinship, ready and willing to do whatever
he might require, and presented him also with magnificent
gifts. Alexander was so gratified by their professions of
goodwill that he permitted their cities to remain in the
enjoyment of their freedom.^ He then advanced his
arms against their next neighbours ; and finding that the
people called Agalassians ^ had mustered an army of
40,000 foot and 3000 horse, he gave them battle, and
proving victorious put the greater number of them to the
sword. The rest, who had fled for safety to the adjacent
towns, which were soon captured, he condemned to
slavery. The remainder of the inhabitants had been
collected into one place, and he seized 20,000 of them,
who had taken refuge in a large city, which he stormed.
The Indians, however, having barricaded the narrow
streets, fought with great vigour from the houses, so that
Alexander in pressing the attack lost not a few Mace-
donians. This enraged him, and he set fire to the city,
1 See Note E 36 ; and Abbott, Gradus ad Aornoii). Curtius (viii. 37, 38)
describes with more minuteness than Arrian the nature of the
engineering operations designed to make the attack against the
walls practicable. He states that Assacanus, the king of the
place, died before Alexander's arrival, and not after the siege had
begun, as Arrian relates. He adds that Assacanus was succeeded
by his mother (wife?), whose name was Cleophis, and who,
according to Justin, bore a son whose paternity was ascribed to
Alexander. In reference to this statement Dr. Bellew remarks
that at the present day several of the chiefs and ruling families
in the neighbouring states of Chitral and Badakhshan boast a
liiieal descent from Alexander the Great.
Note E. — Bazira
Some writers have taken Bazira to be Bajore, which lies mid-
way between the river of Kunar and the Landai, but there is
nothing beyond the similarity of the two names to recommend
this view. As the Bazirians fled for refuge to the rock Aornos,
which overhung the Indus, it is evident they could not have
inhabited a place so remote from the rock as Bajore. Cun-
ningham finds a more likely position for Bazira at Bazar, " a large
village situated on the Kalpan, or Kali-pani river, and quite close
to the town of Rustaju, which is built on a very extensive old
mound. . . . According to tradition this was the site of the
original town of Bazar. The position is an important one, as it
stands just midway between the Swat and the Indus rivers, and
has therefore been from time immemorial the entrepot of trade
between the rich valley of Swat and the large towns on the Indus
and Kabul rivers. . . . This identification is much strengthened
by the proximity of Mount Dantalok, which is most probably the
same range of hills as the Mofites Daedali of the Greeks." See
his Afic. Geog. of India, pp. 65, 66.
Note F. — Aornos
The identification of this celebrated rock has been one of the
most perplexing problems of Indian archaeology. The descrip-
tions given of it by the classical writers are more or less discrepant,
and their indications as to its position very vague and obscure.
336
APPENDICES
It has thus been identified with various positions, against each of
which objections of more or less weight may be urged, but the
view of General Abbott, who has identified it with Mount Maha-
ban, has the balance of argument in its favour, and is now
generally adopted. The rock, to judge from Arrian's description
of it, must have been in reality a mountain of very considerable
height, with a summit of tableland crowned here and there with
steep precipices. Curtius, on the other hand, says that the rock,
which was on all sides steep and rugged, did not rise to its
pinnacle in slopes of ordinary height and of easy ascent, but that
in shape it resembled the conical pillar of the racecourse, called
the meta, which springs from a broad basis and gradually tapers
till it terminates in a sharp point. Here Arrian, who drew his
facts from Ptolemy, a prominent actor in capturing Aornos, is, as
usual, a safer guide than Curtius, who wrote for effect, and often
dealt unscrupulously with the facts of history. Arrian, again, is
at variance with Diodoros in his estimate botli of the circuit and
of the height of the rock, for while with him it has a circuit of
200 stadia (about 23 miles) and a height of 11, Diodoros
reduces the circuit by one-half and increases the height to 16
stadia. Curtius is silent on these points, but he mentions a
circumstance of great importance which Arrian has failed to note,
namely, that the roots of the rock were washed by the river
Indus. That he is right here cannot be questioned, for the
statement is corroborated both by Diodoros and by Strabo (xv.
687), while Arrian, who says nothing that can lead us to think
that his view was different, supplies us with a proof that Aornos
was close to the Indus, for he says of the city of Embolima, which
we now know to have been on the Indus, that it was situated close
to Aornos. The position thus indicated is about sixty miles
above Attak, where the Indus escapes into the plains from a long
and narrow mountain gorge which the ancients mistook for its
source. Colonel Abbott in 1854 explored this neighbourhood,
and came to the conclusion that Mount Mahaban, a hill which
abuts precipitously on the western bank of the Indus about eight
miles west from the site of Embolima, was Aornos. His argu-
ments in support of this identification are given in his Gradus ad
Aornofi. His description of Mount Mahaban agrees in the main
with that which Arrian has given of Aornos. "The rock
Aornos," he says, "was the most remarkable feature of the
country, as is the Mahaban. It was the refuge of all the neigh-
bouring tribes. It was covered with forests. It had good soil
sufficient for a thousand ploughs, and pure springs of water every-
where abounded. It was 4125 feet above the plain, and 14
APPENDICES
337
miles in circuit. It was precipitous on the side of Embolima, yet
not so steep but that 220 horse and the war-engines were taken
to the summit. The summit was a plain where cavalry could act.
It would be difficult to offer a more faithful description of the
mount." "Why the historians," he adds, "should all call it the
rock Aornos, it would be difficult to say. The side on which
Alexander scaled the main summit had certainly the character of
a rock, but the whole description of Arrian indicates a table
mountain." Cunningham, in his Ancient Geography of India,
advances some arguments against this identification, but they
cannot be considered sufficiently cogent to warrant its rejection
unless a better could be substituted. That which he proposes,
however, is altogether untenable. What he suggests is that the
hill-fortress of Rani-gat, situated immediately above the small
village of Nogram, about sixteen miles north by west from Ohind,
which he takes to be the site of Embolima, corresponds in all
essential particulars, except in its elevation (under 1200 feet),
with the description of Aornos as given by Arrian, Strabo, and
Diodoros. Now if the elevation stated, which is some 6000 feet
under what Arrian assigns to Aornos, was really the height of the
rock, then the details of the operations by which it was captured
are rendered partly unintelligible. Thus, why should Ptolemy,
after ascending the rock to a certain distance, have kindled a fire
to let Alexander, who remained at the base, know where he was ?
Can we not easily see with the naked eye from the foot to the
top of a small hill only ten or eleven hundred feet high ? More-
over, we are informed that it took Alexander from daybreak till
noon to reach the position occupied by Ptolemy. Can it be
supposed that all that space of time was required for the ascent
of a hill not much higher than Arthur's Seat, near Edinburgh ?
The highest mountain in Great Britain could be climbed in half
the time. Another equally fatal objection to this theory is the
distance of Rani-gat from the Indus. The roots of the rock were
indubitably washed by that river, but Rani-gat is no less than
sixteen miles distant from it. At the same time, if Rani-gat were
Aornos, then Ohind cannot be Embolima, for Arrian says that
Embolima was close to {^vveyyv^) Aornos. The identification of
the rock with Raja Hodi's fort opposite Attak, first suggested by
General Court and afterwards supported by the learned missionary
Loewenthal, has in its favour the fact that the position is on the
Indus, but it is otherwise untenable. It is uncertain whether the
name Aornos is purely Greek or an attempt at the transliteration
of the indigenous name. If purely Greek, then Dionysios Perieg.
(1. 1 150) is right in saying that men called the rock Aornis
338
APPENDICES
because even swift-winged birds had difficulty in flying over it.
If indigenous, the name may be referred to Aranai\ which, as Dr.
Bellew states, is a common Hindi name for hill ridges in these
parts. He identifies the rock as Shah Dum or Malka^ on the
heights of Mahaban, the stronghold of the Wahabi fanatics, at the
destruction of which he was present in 1864. See his Inquiry^
p. 6Z.
Note G. — Nysa
Arrian's narrative indicates neither in what part of the Kophen
and Indus Doab Nysa was situated, nor at what time Alexander
made his expedition to the place. But we learn from Curtius
(viii. 10), Strabo (xv. 697), and Justin (xii. 7) that he was there
before he had as yet crossed the Choaspes and taken Massaga,
and Arrian says nothing from which it can be inferred that his
opinion was different. Nysa was therefore most probably the
city which Ptolemy calls Nagara or Dionysopolis, and which has
been identified with Nanghenhar (the Nagarahara of Sanskrit), an
ancient capital, the ruins of which have been traced at a distance
of four or five miles west from Jalalabad. This place was called
also Udyanapura, i.e. " the city of gardens," which the Greeks from
some resemblance in the sound translated into Dionysopolis, a
compound meaning "the city of Dionysos." At some distance
eastward from this site, but on the opposite bank of the river,
there is a mountain called Mar - Koh {i.e. snake-hill) which, if
Nysa be Nagara, may be regarded as the Mount Meros which
lay near it, and was ascended by Alexander. It has, however,
been assumed that, in Arrian's opinion, the expedition to Nysa
was not an early incident of the campaign in the Doab, but the
last of any importance after the capture of Aornos. The only
ground for this assumption is that his account of the expedition
to Nysa follows that of all the other transactions recorded to
have occurred west of the Indus. But the reason of this is not
far to seek. Arrian, on examining the accounts given by different
writers of the visit to Nysa and Meros, concluded that they were
for the most part apocryphal, and as he did not wish to mix up
romance with history, reserved the subject for separate treatment.
Abbott, who took it for granted that Arrian wished it to be
understood that Alexander visited Nysa after the capture of the
rock, looked for the site of that city nearer the Indus than the
plain of Jalalabad ; and found one to suit the requirements in the
neighbourhood of Mount Elum, called otherwise Ram Takht or
"the throne of Ram." This remarkable mountain, he says, rises
like some mighty pagoda to the height of nine or ten thousand
APPENDICES
339
feet, and answers in many points to the descriptions given of
Meros, being densely covered with forests, full of wild beasts
and of a height at which, in that part of India, ivy, box, etc.,
flourish. At its roots are the following old towns with names all
derivable from Bacchos : Lusa (Nysa), Lyocah (Lyaeus), Elye,
Awan, Bimeeter (Bimeter), Bokra (Bou - Kera), and Kerauna
(Keraunos). Beneath the town of Lusa flows the river Burindu,
which is occasionally unfordable during the spring. Abbott
makes this remark about the river wuth reference to the statement
in Plutarch that when Alexander sat down before Nysa, the
Macedonians had some difficulty of advancing to the attack on
account of the depth of the river that washed its walls. V. de
Saint-Martin and Dr. Bellew identify Nysa with Nysatta, a village
near the northern bank of the Kabul river about six miles below
Hashtnagar, but except some correspondence between the names,
there seems little to recommend this view. Strabo has one or
two passages concerning Nysa. "In Sophocles," he says, "a
person is introduced speaking the praises of Nysa, as a mountain
sacred to Bacchos: * Whence I beheld, the famed Nysa, the
resort of the Bacchanalian bands, which the horned lacchos
makes his most pleasant and beloved retreat, where no bird's
clang is heard.' From such stories they gave the name Nysaians
to some imaginary nation, and called their city Nysa, founded by
Bacchos ; a mountain above the city they called Meros, alleging
as a reason for imposing these names that the ivy and vine grow
there, although the latter does not perfect its fruit, for the bunches
of grapes drop off before maturity in consequence of excessive
rains " (xv. 687). In a subsequent passage (697) he says : "After
the river Kophes follows the Indus. The country lying between
these two rivers is occupied by the Astakenoi, Masianoi, Nysaioi,
and the Hippasioi. Next is the territory of Assakanos, where is
the city Masoga." Pliny also has one or two notices of Nysa.
"Most writers," he says {H. N. vi. 21), "assume that the city
Nysa and also the mountain Merus, consecrated to the god
Bacchus, belong to India. This is the mountain whence arose
the fable that Bacchus issued from the thigh (fJLijpos) of Jupiter.
They also assign to India the country of the Aspagani so plentiful
in vines, laurel, and box, and all kinds of fruitful trees that grow
in Greece." In Book viii. 141, he says "that on Nysa, a
mountain in India, there are lizards 24 feet in length, and in
colour yellow or purple or blue."
The legend that Dionysos was bred in the thigh of Zeus owes
its origin to a figurative mode of expression, common among the
Phoenicians and Hebrews, which was taken by the Greeks in a
340
APPENDICES
literal sense. See the Epistle to the Hebrews, vii. lo. The
Kafirs who now occupy the country through which Alexander
first marched on his way from the Kaukasos to the Indus, are
said by Elphinstone to drink wine to great excess, men and
women alike. *' They dance," he adds, " with great vehemence,
using many gesticulations, and beating the ground with great
force, to a music which is generally quick, but varied and wild.
Such usages would certainly have struck the Macedonians as
Bacchanalian." So certainly would such a spectacle as the
following, described by Bishop Heber in his India?i Journal:
"The two brothers Rama and Luchman, in a splendid palkee,
were conducting the retreat of their army. The divine Huniman,
as naked and almost as hairy as the animal he represented, was
gamboling before them, with a long tail tied round his waist, a
mask to represent the head of a baboon, and two great pointed
clubs in his hands. His army followed, a number of men with
similar tails and masks, their bodies dyed with indigo, and also
armed with clubs. I was never so forcibly struck with the
identity of Rama and Bacchus. Here were before me Bacchus,
his brother Ampelus, the Satyrs, smeared with wine-lees, and the
great Pan commanding them." I may, in conclusion, subjoin a
notice of Bacchos in India from Polyainos : " Dionysos marching
against the Indians in order that the Indians might receive him
did not equip his troops with armour that could be seen, but
with soft raiment and fawn skins. The spears were wrapped
round with ivy, and the thyrsus had a sharp point. In making
signals he used cymbals and drums instead of the trumpet, and,
by warming the enemy with wine, he turned them (from war) to
dancing. These and all other Bacchic orgies were the stratagems
of war by which Bacchos subjugated the Indians and all the rest
of Asia. Dionysos, when in India, seeing that his army could
not endure the burning heat, seized the three-peaked mountain of
India. Of its peaks one is called Korasibie, another Kondaske,
but the third he himself named Meros in commemoration of his
birth. Upon it were many fountains of water sweet of taste,
abundance of game and fruit, and snows, which gave new vigour
to the frame. The troops quartered there would take the bar-
barians of the plains by surprise, and put them to an easy rout
by attacking them with missiles from their commanding position
on the heights above. Dionysos having conquered the Indians,
invaded Baktria, taking with him as auxiliaries the Indians them-
selves and the Amazons."
APPENDICES
341
Note H. — Gold-digging Ants
Herodotos was the first writer who communicated to the
Western nations the story of these ants. He relates it thus
(iii. 102): "There are other Indians bordering on the city of
Kaspatyros and the country of Paktyike (Afghanistan) settled
northward of the other Indians, who resemble the Baktrians in
the way they live. They are the most warlike of the Indians,
and are the men whom they send to procure the gold (paid in
tribute to the King of Persia), for their country adjoins the desert
of sand. In this desert then and in the sand there are ants, in
size not quite so big as dogs, but larger than foxes. Some that
were captured were taken thence, and are with the Kinix of the
Persians. These ants, forming their dwelling underground, heap
up the sand as the ants in Greece do, and in the same manner ;
and are very like them in shape. The sand which they cast up
is mixed with gold. The Indians therefore go to the desert to
get this sand, each man having three camels . . . (c. 105).
When the Indians arrive at the spot they fill their sacks with the
sand, and return home with all possible speed. For the ants, as
the Persians say, having readily discovered them by the smell,
pursue them, and, as they are the swiftest of all animals, not one
of the Indians could escape except by getting the start while the
ants were assembling."
Nearchos (quoted by Strabo, xv. 705) says that he saw skins
of the ants which dig up gold as large as the skins of leopards.
Megasthenes also (as quoted in the same passage) says that
among the Dardai, a populous nation of the Indians living
towards the east and among the mountains, there was a mountain
plain of about 3000 stadia in circumference, below which were
mines containing gold, which ants not less in size than foxes dig
up. In winter they dig holes and pile up the earth in heaps, like
moles, at the pit-mouths. Pliny (xi. 31) repeats the story in these
terms : " The horns of the Indian ant fixed up in the temple of
Hercules at Erythrae were objects of great wonderment. These
ants excavate gold from mines found in the country of those
Northern Indians who are called the Dardae. They are of the
colour of cats and of the size of Egyptian wolves. The Indians
steal the gold which they dig up in winter during the hot season
when the ants keep within their burrows to escape the stifling
sultriness of the weather. The ants, however, aroused by the
smell, sally out and frequently overtake and mangle the robbers,
though they have the swiftest of camels to aid their flight." It is
now understood that the gold-digging ants were neither, as the
342
APPENDICES
ancients supposed, an extraordinary kind of real ants, nor, as
many learned men have since supposed, larger animals mistaken
for ants, but Tibetan miners who, like their descendants of the
present day, preferred working their mines in winter when the
frozen soil stands well and is not likely to trouble them by falling
in. The Sanskrit word pipilika denotes both an ant and a
particular kind oi gold.
The Dards consist now of several wild and predatory tribes
which are settled on the north-west frontier of Kashmir and by
the banks of the Indus. The gryphons who guarded the gold
were Tibetan mastiffs, a breed of unmatched ferocity. Gold is
still found in these regions.
Note I. — Taxila
Pliny, in his Natural History (vi. 21), gives sixty miles as the
distance from Peukolatis (Hashtnagar) to Taxila. This would fix
Its site somewhere on the Haro river to the west of Hasan Abdal,
or just two days' march from the Indus. But according to the
Itineraries of the Chinese pilgrims, Fa-Hian and Hwen Thsiang,
Taxila lay at three days' journey to the east of the Indus, and as
they made that journey, their authority on the point cannot be
questioned. Taxila, it may be therefore concluded, must havei
been situated in the immediate neighbourhood of Kala-ka-Sarai.
Now at the distance of just one mile from this place, near the
rock-seated village of Shah-Dheri, Cunningham discovered the
ruins of a fortified city scattered over a wide space, extending
about three miles from north to south, and two miles from east
to west, and these ruins he took to be those of Taxila. They
he about eight miles south-east of Hasan Abdal, thirty-four miles
west from the famous tope of Manikyala, and twenty-four miles
north- west from Rawal Pindi. The most ancient part of
these ruins, according to the belief of the natives, is a great
mound rising to a height of sixty-eight feet above the bed of
the stream, called the Tabra Nala, which flows past its east
side. Cunningham's identification has now been accepted by
all archaeologists, and a Greek text hitherto neglected strik-
ingly confirms its correctness. This text is to be found in
the Pseudo-Kallisthenes, and I here translate the remarks made
upon It by Sylvain Levi in a paper which he submitted last
year to the Societe Asiatique, and which will be found printed
at pp. 236, 237 in the 15th volume of the 8th series of
the Journal of that society : " The Pseudo-Kallisthenes dwells
complacently on the sojourn of Alexander at Taxila and his
APPENDICES
343
conversations with the Brahmans. The Brahmans (III. xii.
9, 10) blame the conduct of Kalanos, who, in violation of the
duties of his caste, went to live with the Macedonians. ' It has
not pleased him,' say they, * to drink the water of wisdom at the
river Tiberoboam.' And further on (III. xiii. 12) they ask,
' How could Alexander be the master of all the world when he
has not yet gone beyond the river Tiberoboam ? ' The Latin of
Julius Valerius gives, in the first case, Tiberunco fluvio ; in the
second, Tyberoboam. The various reacjings of the Greek manu-
scripts, indicated by C. Miiller in his edition (Didot, 1846), give
Boroam, Baroam, Tiberio-potamos, and lastly (MS. A.) Tiber-
nabon. The site fixed by Cunningham for the city of Taxila is
distinctly traversed by a river called Tabra Nala, which divides
into two the ancient city, and washes the foot of the citadel.
The ease of confounding the C with A in the manuscripts per-
mits the correction of Tibernabon into Tibernalon. The essen-
tial part of the name is, moreover, Tabra, nala being a designation
common to small affluents. The resemblance of the two words
Tabranala and Tibernalos is at once apparent ; the persistence
of geographical names has nothing surprising in it, especially in
India. The city of Takshas'ila ought then to be placed definitely
on the banks of the Tabranala (a small affluent of the Haro,
which bends its course to the Indus, into which it falls twelve miles
below Attock) in the position proposed by General Cunning-
ham."
Taxila, as Alexander found it, was very populous, and pos-
sessed of almost incredible wealth. Pliny states that it was
situated on a level where the hills sink down into the plain,
while Strabo praises the soil as extremely fertile from the
number of its springs and water - courses. The Chinese pil-
grim, Hwen Thsiang, by whom it was visited in 630 a.d.,
and afterwards in 643, confirms what Strabo has reported.
Taxila, which in Ptolemy's Geography appears as Taxiala^
represents either the Sanskrit Takshas'ila, i,e. "hewn stone,''
or, more probably, Takshakas'ila, i.e. " Rock of Takshaka,"
the great Naga King. Others, however, take it to represent
the Pali Takkas'ila, i.e. the rock of the Takkas, a powerful tribe
which anciently occupied the regions between the Indus and the
Chenab (v. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, vol. xx. p. 343).
The famous As'oka, the grandson of Chandragupta (Sandro-
kottos), resided in Taxila during the lifetime of his father,
Vindusara, as viceroy of the Panjab. About the beginning of
the second century B.C. Taxila appears to have formed part of
the dominions of the Graeco-Baktrian king, Eukratides. In
344
APPENDICES
126 B.C. it was wrested from the Greeks by the Sus or Abars, with
whom it remained for about three-quarters of a century, when it
was conquered by the Kushan tribe under the great Kanishka.
In the year 42 a.d. it is said to have been visited by Apollonios
of Tyana and his companion, the Assyrian Damis, who wrote a
-^
/'
1*^ *t^ ■ ■■ ^'-
Fig. 15. — EUKRATIDES.
narrative of the journey, which Philostratos professes to have
followed in his life of Apollonios. In 400 a.d. it was visited by
Fa-Hian, who calls it Chu-sha-shi-lo, i.e. *'the severed head,"
the usual name by which Taxila was known to the Buddhists of
India (v. Cunningham's Aric. Geog. of India, pp. 1 04-1 21).
Note J. — Site of Alexander's Camp on the Hydasp^s
It is a point of great importance to determine where the camp
was situated which Alexander formed on reaching the Hydaspes,
and which he made his headquarters till he effected the passage
of the river. Without knowing this it cannot with certainty be
decided at what point he made the passage or where he defeated
Poros, or where he founded the two cities, Nikaia and Boukephala,
which he built after his victory. Such high authorities as Sir A.
Burnes, General Court, and General Abbott have placed the
camp at Jhilam, but Lord Elphinstone and General Cunningham
\f prefer Jalalpur, a place some thirty miles lower down the stream.
These writers all drew their conclusions from personal knowledge
of the localities concerned. Cunningham, who wrote later than
the others, visited the Hydaspes in 1863, and in his Geography
of Ancient hidia (pp. 157-179) gives an account of the' scope
and results of his investigations. He points out that Alexander
in advancing from Taxila to the Hydaspes had two roads one
called the upper, which proceeded through a rich and fertile
country, past Rawal Pindi, Manikyala, and Rohtas to Jhilam,
\ and another called the lower, which proceeded, with an inclina-
APPENDICES 345
tion to southward, to Dudhial, and thence by Asanot and Vang '
to Jalalpur. He then shows from Strabo and Pliny that Alex^
ander must have advanced by the lower road. According to
Strabo (XV. i. 32), "the direction of Alexander's march, as far
as the Hydaspes, was, for the most part, towards the south ;
after that, to the Hypanis, it w^as more towards the eastP Now,
if Alexander had taken the route by Jhilam he would have
advanced in one continuous straight line, which is in direct
opposition to the explicit statement of Strabo, which makes him
deviate towards the south. Pliny again (vi. 21), quoting from
Diognetos and Baiton, the mensores of Alexander, gives the
distance from Taxila to the Hydaspes as 120 (Roman) miles.
In comparing this distance with that from Shah-Dheri to Jhilam
and Jalalpur respectively, we must reject Jhilam, which is no less
than sixteen miles short of the recorded distance, while Jalalpur
differs from it by less than two miles. The same author thinks
that the camp probably extended for about six miles along the
bank of the river from Shah Kabir, two miles to the north-east of
Jalalpur, down to Syadpur, four miles to the west-south-w^est. In
this position the left flank of the camp would have been only
six miles from the wooded promontory of Kotera, where he in-
tended to steal his passage across the river. The breadth of the
Hydaspes at Jalalpur is about a mile and a quarter.
Note K. — Battle with Poros
To the accounts of this memorable battle given by Arrian
and the four other writers translated in this volume, I here add
the account of it given by Polyainos in his work On the
Stratagems of War (II. ix. 22) :
"Alexander, in his Indian expedition, advanced to the
Hydaspes with intention to cross it, when Porus appeared with
his army on the other side determined to dispute his passage.
Alexander then marched towards the head of the river, and
attempted to cross it there. Thither also Porus marched, and
drew up his army on the opposite side. He then made the
same effort lower down ; there, too, Porus opposed him. Those
frequent appearances of intention to cross it, without ever
making one real attempt to effect it, the Indians ridiculed, and,
concluding that he had no real design to pass the river, they
became more negligent in attending his motions, when Alexander,
by a rapid march gaining the banks, effected his purpose on
barges, boats, and hides stuffed with straw, before the enemy
had time to come up with him, w^ho, deceived by so many feint
346
APPENDICES
attempts, yielded him at last an uninterrupted passage. In the
battle against Porus, Alexander posted part of his cavalry in the
right wing, and part he left as a body of reserve at a small
distance on the plain. His left wing consisted of the phalanx
and his elephants. Porus ordered his elephants to be formed
against him, himself taking his station on an elephant at the
head of his left wing. The elephants were drawn up within
fifty yards of each other, and in those interstices was posted his
infantry, so that his front exhibited the appearance of a great
wall ; the elephants looked like so many towers, and the infantry
like the parapet between them. Alexander directed his infantry
to attack the enemy in front, while himself at the head of the
horse advanced against the cavalry. Against those movements
Porus ably guarded. But the beasts could not be kept in their
ranks, and, wherever they deserted them, the Macedonians in a
compact body pouring in closed with the enemy, and attacked
them both in front and flank. The body of reserve, in the
meantime wheeling round and attacking their rear, completed
the defeat " {Shepherd: s Translation).
Grote, referring to this battle, remarks that "the day on
which it was fought was the greatest day of Alexander's life, if
we take together the splendour and difficulty of the military
achievement and the generous treatment of his conquered
opponent." Military critics cannot point to a single strategical
error in the whole series of operations conducted by Alexander
himself, or his generals acting under his orders, from the
time he encamped on the bank of the Hydaspes till the over-
throw and surrender of Poros. At the same time the courage
and skill with which the Indian king contended against the
greatest soldier of antiquity, if not of all time, are worthy of the
highest admiration, and present a striking contrast to the incom-
petent generalship and pusillanimity of Darius. " The Greeks,"
says General Chesney, "were loud in praises of the Indians;
never in all their eight years of constant warfare had they met
with such skilled and gallant soldiers, who, moreover, surpassed
in stature and bearing all the other races of Asia. . . . The
Indian village community flourished even at that distant period,
and in the brave and manly race which fought so stoutly under
Porus twenty-two centuries ago we may recognise all the fine
qualities of the Punjabi agrarian people of the present day, the
gallant men who fought us in our turn so stubbornly, now the
most valuable component of the Indian empire, and the best
soldiers of its Queen-Empress."
APPENDICES
347
Note L. — The Kathaians
The Kathaioi, it would appear from the text, inhabited the (
regions lying to the east of the Hydraotes. Some writers,
however, as Strabo informs us (XV. i. 30), placed their country in
the tract between the Hydaspes and Akesines, but this view is
manifestly wrong. They are described by ancient authors as one
of the most powerful nations of India. Their very name indicates
their warlike propensities and predominance, for if it is not
identical with that of the military caste, Kshatriya, it is at least
a modified form of that word. Arrian subsequently (vi. 15)
mentions a tribe of independent Indians whose name is a still
closer transliteration of Kshatriya, the Xathroi, whose territories
lay between the Indus and the lower course of the Akesines.
Strabo (XV. i. 30) notices some of the peculiar manners and
customs of the Kathaians, such as infanticide, and Sati. Lassen
has pointed out that their name is connected with that of the
Kattia, a nomadic race scattered at intervals through the plains
of the Panjab, but supposed to be the aborigines of the country
and of Kolarian descent. Their name occurs in that of the
province of Kathiawar, which now comprises the province of
Gujerat.
Note M. — Sangala
Sir E. H. Bunbury, referring to the uncertainty of the
identifications of the tribes and cities of the Panjab mentioned
by Alexander's historians, says : " While the general course of his
march must have followed approximately the same line of route
that has been frequented in all ages from the banks of the Indus
to those of the Beas, his expeditions against the various warlike
tribes that refused submission to his arms led him into frequent
excursions to the right and left of his main direction. And with
regard to these localities we have a general clue to guide us.
The most important of these sites to determine would be that of
Sangala, the capital of the Cathaeans, which, according to the
narrative of Arrian, was situated between the Hydraotes and the
Hyphasis. Hence it was placed by Burnes at Lahore, and by
others at Umritsir. But on the other hand there are not wanting
strong reasons for identifying Sangala with the Sakala of Indian
writers, and this was certainly situated to the west of the Hydraotes,
between that river and the Acesines " {Hist, of Am. Geog. pp.
444, 445)- This was the view of General Cunningham, who, taking
Sakala or Sakala (the Sagala of Ptolemy's Geography) to be the
name in Sanskrit of the place which the Greeks aiW^d^Safigala, found
348
APPENDICES
a site for it at Sanglawala-Tiba, a small rocky hill with ruins upon
I It and with a large swamp at its base, and situated between the
Ravi (Hydraotes) and the Chenab (Akesines) at a distance of about
sixty miles to the west of Lahore. This was no doubt the site of
the S akala of Sanskrit writers and of the She-kie-lo of the Chinese
pilgrim Hwen Thsiang, who visited the place in 630 a.d. But
It cannot have been the site of the Sangala of the Greeks, for, in
the first place, according to the testimony of all the historians,
that city lay between the Hydraotes and the Hyphasis, and was
attacked by Alexander after he had crossed the former river. To
meet this objection Cunningham assumes that Alexander must
have recrossed the Hydraotes on hearing that the Kathaians had
risen in his rear. His thus turning aside from the direction of
his march to make his rear secure is quite consistent with his
usual practice, but the historians say nothing from which it can
possibly be inferred that on this occasion he made any retrograde
movement. But again philology as well as history is adverse
to this identification, for, as has lately been shown by M. Sylvain
Levi {Journal Asiatique, series viii. vol. xv. pp. 237-239), Sangala,
in accordance with the rules of transcription, must be taken to
represent not Sakala, but Sdmkala. Now, just as in Diodoros
and Curtius we find Sangala mentioned in connection with a king
called Sophytes, so in an Appendix to Panini's Grammar, called
the Gana-patha, Sihnkala is mentioned in connection with
Saubhuta, which, in accordance with the rules of transcription
and the Greek practice of designating Indian rulers after their
territories, is evidently the name of the country over which
Sophytes ruled. This country, which was rich and prosperous, as
'Its very name implies, lay between the Hydraotes and the
jHyphasis, probably in the district of Amritsar and towards the
hills. Arrian in his narrative of the campaign between these two
rivers makes no mention of Sophytes, or, as he calls him,
Sopeithes, but he afterwards refers to a king of this name whose
dominions lay between !he Hydaspes and Akesines. Strabo
was aware of the discrepancy of the accounts as to where the
dominions of the Kathaians and King Sophytes were situated.
Note N. — Alexander's Altars on the Hyphasis
These altars are mentioned by Pliny, who says (vi. 21) : "The
Hyphasis was the limit of the marches of Alexander, who, how-
ever, crossed it, and dedicated altars on the further bank."
Pliny stands alone in placing these altars on the left bank of
the river. The historians all place them on the right bank.
APPENDICES
349
Philostratos states that Apollonios of Tyana on his journey into
India in the second century of our aera, found the altars still
subsisting and their inscriptions still legible. Plutarch affirms
that in his days they were held in much veneration by the
Praisians, whose kings, he says, were in the habit of crossing the
Ganges every year to offer sacrifices in the (kecian manner upon
them. It would, however, be unsafe to place much credit in
either of these statements. The altars have been sought for in
recent times, but not the slightest vestige of them has been
discovered. Masson and some other modern writers place them
on the Gharra (the united stream of the Vipas'a and the S atadru
(or Satlej), but this view, while otherwise exposed to serious
objections, is upset by the fact alone that in ancient times the
two rivers united at a point forty miles below their present junction.
As PHny (vi. 21) gives the distance from the Hyphasis to the
Hesidrus (Satlej) along the Royal Road at 169 miles, it is evident
that the altars must have been situated at a point high above
the junction of these two rivers. V. de Saint-Martin is inclined
to think that the altars may have been situated near a chain of
heights met with in ascending the Beias, and known locally under
the name of the Sekandar-giri, that is, "Alexander's mountain."
These heights are at no great distance from Rajagiri, a small and
obscure place, but supposed to represent Rajagriha mentioned
in the Ramdyana as the capital of a line of princes called the
AsVapati (or Assapati in Prakrit) who governed the Kekaya, or,
as Arrian calls them in his Indika, the Kekeoi. Lassen, followed
by Saint-Martin, identified Sopeithes as belonging to the line of
princes indicated. The identification has been superseded by a
better, but Saint-Martin's argument, as far as it concerns the
position of the altars, is not thereby affected. Sir E. H. Bunbury
considers that the point where Alexander erected the twelve
altars cannot be regarded as determined within even approximate
limits. It appears probable, he thinks, that they were situated at
some distance above the confluence of the two rivers, and not
very far from the point where the Beas emerges from the
mountain ranges. We learn indeed, he adds, that throughout
his advance Alexander kept as near as he could to the mountains ;
partly from the idea that he would thus find the great rivers more
easily passable, as being nearer their sources ; partly from an
exaggerated impression of the sterile and desert character of the
plains farther south (Hist, of Anc. Geog. p. 444).
350
APPENDICES
Note O. — Voyage down the HydaspIis and Akesin£:s
TO THE Indus
From the point of embarkation at Nikaia (Mong) to the
confluence of the united streams of the Panjab with the Indus,
the distance in a straight Hne may be reckoned at about 300
miles. Alexander in descending to this confluence had no
sooner left the dominions of Poros than he was engaged in a
constant succession of hostilities with the riparian tribes. He
had no intention of leaving India as a fugitive. He must depart
as a conqueror and master of all wherever he appeared. He had
no wish, therefore, even had it been possible, to drop quietly down
stream to the ocean. He must demand submission to his
authority from all the tribes he might encounter on his way, and,
if this were refused, enforce it at the sword's point. These tribes
were the bravest of the brave in India— the very ancestors of the
Rajputras, or Rajputs, whose splendid military quahties have
spread their fame throughout the world. Such of these tribes as
mhabited the fertile regions adjacent to the rivers seemed to have
settled in towns and villages and to have practised agriculture,
while those that tenanted the deserts which extended far eastward
into the interior led a half-wandering pastoral life, and subsisted
as much on the produce of rapine as on the produce of their
flocks and herds. They were all proudly jealous of their
mdependence, and owned no authority but that of their proper
chiefs. Though they were separated into distinct tribes, which were
almost perpetually at feud, they were still able when confronted
with a common danger to combine into formidable confederacies.
In all times they have opposed to invasion a vigorous and some-
times a desperate resistance {v. Saint-Martin, Etude, p. 113).
Note P.— The Malloi and Oxydrakai
The names of these two warlike tribes are very frequently
conjoined in the narratives of the historians. In Sanskrit works
they appear as the Malava and the Kshudraka, and a verse of the
Mahabhdrata combines them in a single appellation, Kshudraka-
malava. They are mentioned in combination by Panini also as
two Bahika people of the north-west. Arrian {Indika c iv )
places the Oxydrakai on the Hydaspes above its confluence with
the Akesmes. It is doubtful, however, that this was their real
position. Bunbury inclines to think that they lay on the east
■or left bank of the Satlej — the province of Bahawalpur —
and that they may very well have extended as far as the junction
APPENDICES
351
of the Satlej with the Indus and the neighbourhood of Uchh.
General Cunningham, he adds, is alone in placing the Oxydracae
to the north of the Malli. That author has, however, the Indika
to support his view. Their name in the classics appears in
various forms, Strabo and Stephanos Byz. calling them Hydrakai,
Pliny Sydracae, and Diodoros Syrakonsai. Strabo says they
were reported to be the descendants of Bacchos because the vine
grew in their country, and because their kings displayed great
pomp in setting out on their warlike expeditions after the Bacchic
manner (XV. i. 8). They are no doubt to be identified with the
S'udras, whose name in early times did not denote a caste, as it
did afterwards, but a tribe of aborigines, or, at all events, a tribe
of non-Aryan origin. The final ka in the Greek form of their
name is a common Sanskrit sufiix to ethnic names given or with-
held at random. The single combat between Dioxippos and a
Macedonian bravo called Horratas took place after a great banquet
at which Alexander entertained the envoys of the Oxydrakai.
The territory of the Malloi was of great extent, comprehending
a part of the Doab formed by the Akesines and the Hydraotes,
and extending, according to Arrian {Indika, c. iv.), to the con-
fluence of the Akesines and the Indus. In the Mahdbharata they
figure as a great people, being there distinguished into the
Eastern, Southern, and Western Malavas {Mahdbh. vi. i o 7 ). They
are mentioned also in the inscription of Samudragupta (of the
first half of the third century a.d.) among other peoples of the
Panjab who were subject to the King of Madhya-desha {v. V.
de Saint-Martin, Etude, pp. 11 6-1 20). "These two races," says
Thirlwall {History of Greece, vii. 40), ''were composed of widely
different elements ; for the name of one appears to have been
derived from that of the Sudra caste ; and it is certain that the
Brahmins were predominant in the other. We can easily under-
stand why they did not intermarry and were seldom at peace
with each other." The feud, however, may have been one of
race rather than of caste, though no doubt the distinctions of
caste originated in difference of race.
Note Q. — The Capital of the Malloi
Diodoros and Curtius assign this city to the Oxydrakai, but
erroneously. General Cunningham identifies it with Multan and
takes it to be also the capital of the Malloi " to which many men
from other cities had fled for safety." Arrian seems, however, to
indicate that the two places were distinct. V. de Saint-Martin
incHnes to identify the Mallian capital with Harrapa (the Harapa
352
APPENDICES
which Cunningham takes to be the city captured by Perdikkas).
Multan is at present the capital of the province of the same name,
which comprises pretty nearly the same territories as those occu-
pied by the Malloi of the Greek historians. Multan is not situated
on the Ravi now, but on the Chenab, and at a distance of more
than thirty miles beloiv the junction of that river with the Ravi.
This circumstance would be quite fatal to Cunningham's view if
the junction had not shifted. But it has shifted, for in Alexander's
time the rivers met about fifteen miles below Multan. "The old
channel (Cunningham says) still exists and is duly entered in the
large maps of the Multan division. It leaves the present bed at
Sarai Siddhu and follows a winding course for thirty miles to the
south-south-west, when it suddenly turns to the west for eighteen
miles as far as Multan, and, after completely encircling the
fortress, continues its westerly course for five miles below Multan.
It then suddenly turns to the south-south-west for ten miles, and
is finally lost in the low-lying lands of the bed of the Chenab.
Even to this day the Ravi clings to its ancient channel, and at
all high floods the waters of the river still find their way to
Multan by the old bed, as I myself have witnessed on two occa-
sions. The date of the change is unknown, but was certainly
subsequent to a.d. 713." From Arrian's narrative it would
appear that Alexander occupied three days, one of which was
spent in rest, in advancing from the city of the Brachmans to the
city of the Malloi. The distance traversed would be thirty-four
miles, if Cunningham's identification of the former city with Atari
and of the latter with Multan be correct. The city where
Alexander was wounded appears from Arrian's account to have
been at some distance from the Hydraotes, and if so could not
have been Multan.
Note R. — Alexander in Sindh
Arrian and the other historians of Alexander have treated
very briefly and vaguely his campaign in the valley of the Indus.
Hence it is difficult to trace the course of his operations as he
descended from the great confluence at Uchh to Patala where
the Indus bifurcates to form the Delta. The distance between
these two points, if measured by the course of the river, may be
estimated at nearly four hundred miles, yet we find, as Saint-
Martin observes, that in the descent not a single distance is indi-
cated, nor a single peculiar feature of the country described
'which might serve as a sign-post for the direction and guidance
of our inquiries. 1 It is at the same time difficult to reconcile the
APPENDICES
353
discrepancies found to exist in the accounts transmitted to us,
and altogether the search for identities must here mainly concern
itself with the names of tribes. In determining how these tribes
were collocated it is necessary to take cognisance of the changes
which have taken place in the course of the Indus since Alex-
ander's time. Captain M'Murdo was the first to call attention
(in 1834) to these changes, which were not confined to the
terminal course of the river, but extended more than two hundred
miles above the Delta. !He proved that up to the seventh century
of our aera the main stream of the Indus, instead of following its
present channel, pursued a more direct course to the sea some
sixty or seventy miles farther east than it now flows. The old
channel, which leaves the present stream at some distance above
Bhakar, passes the ruins of Alor, and then proceeds directly
towards the south nearly as far as Brahmanabad, above which it
divides into two channels, one rejoining the present course above
Haidarabad, while the other pursues a south - easterly course
towards the Ran of Kachh. I The voyage down the lower part of
the course took place during the season of the inundation when
the plains were laid far and wide under water, and the current was
rapid and violent. As the march followed mainly the line of the
river the country would appear to the Macedonians extremely
rich, fertile, and populous, while the sterility of the regions
that lay beyond the reach of the inundations would seldom be
brought under their cognisance. In descending the river they
could not fail to notice the contrast presented by the plains on
its opposite banks, those on the east exhibiting a uniform expanse
without any visible boundary, while those on the w^st were
hemmed in by a great mountain rampart which in running south-
wards gradually approached the Indus till the roots of the hills
were laved by its waters. The inhabitants would strike them as
being more swarthy in their complexion than the men of the
Pan jab, from whom they differed also in their political pre-
dilections, as they preferred kingly government to republican
independence, and allowed the Brahman to exercise a decisive
influence over public life. The descent of the Indus by Alex-
ander, as Bunbury remarks, may be considered as constituting a
kind of aera in the geographical knowledge of the Greeks. It
does not appear, he adds, that it was ever repeated ; and while
subsequent researches added materially to the knowledge pos-
sessed by the Greeks of the valley of the Ganges and the more
easterly provinces of India, their information concerning the
great river Indus and the regions through which it flows con-
tinued to be derived almost exclusively from the voyage of
2 A
354
APPENDICES
Alexander and the accounts transmitted by the contemporary
historians.
i After leaving the great confluence the first tribe Alexander
reached were the Sogdoi, who appear as the Sodrai in Diodoros,
who states that Alexander founded among them on the banks of
the river a city called Alexandreia in which he placed 10,000
inhabitants. The Sogdoi have been identified with the Sohda
Rajputs who now occupy the south-east district of Sindh about
Amarkot, but who in former times held large possessions on the
banks of the Indus to the northward of Alor. I This place, though
now only a scene of ruins, was formerly, before it was deserted by
the river, one of the largest and most flourishing cities in all
Sindh. Saint-Martin takes it to have been the Sogdian capital,
and thinks that the city which Alexander founded lay in its
vicinity at Rori, since right opposite to this place there rose in
the middle of the river the rocky island of Bhakar, which presented
every natural advantage for the site of a great fortress. 1 Cunning-
ham, however, would place the capital higher up stream, about
midway between Alor and Uchh, at a village which appears in old
maps under the name of Sirwahi, and which may possibly represent
the Seori of Sindh history and the Sodrai oi Diodoros. \ In this
neighbourhood lies the most frequented ghat for the crossing of
the Indus towards the west via Gandava and the Bolan Pass ;
and as the ghats always determine the roads, it was probably at
this point of passage Krateros recrossed the Indus when he was
despatched with the main body of the army and the elephants to
return home through the countries in which that Pass lay. The
name Sodrai^ some think, represents the Sanskrit S'lidra which
designates the servile or lowest of the four castes. If this be so,
the Sodrai may be regarded as a remnant of the primitive stock
which peopled the country before the advent of the Aryans (za
Lassen, Ind. Alt. ii. p. 174; Saint-Martin, Etiide^ pp. 1 50-161 ;
Cunningham, Anc. Geog. of India ^ pp. 249-256).
Note S. — Sindimana
Sambus is called Sabus by Curtius, who, without giving the
name of his capital, informs us that Alexander captured it by
mining and then marched to rejoin his fleet on the Indus. The
Greek name of this capital, Sindimana^ has led to its identification
with Sehwan, a site of very high antiquity. The great mound
which was once its citadel has been formed chiefly of ruined
buildings accumulated in the course of ages on a scarped rock at
the end of the Lakki range of hills. Its water supply is at present
APPENDICES
355
entirely derived from the Indus, which not only flows under the
eastern front of the town, but also along the northern by a channel
from the great Manchur Lake, which perhaps formerly extended
up even to the city walls. The objection to this identification,
that Sehwan's position on the Indus conflicts with the statement
that Alexander had to march from Sindomana to reach that river
IS removed by the fact that the Indus has changed its course since
Alexander's time. Wilson derives the Greek Sindomana from
what he calls a very allowable Sanskrit compound, Sindu-man,
" the possessor of Sindh." Cunningham, however, would refer
the name to Saindava-vanavi or Sai?idttwdn, " the abode of the
Saindavas." ^ v. hh A?tc. Geog. of India, pp. 263-266, and also
Samt-Martm's Etude, p. 166, where it is stated that the name of
Sambus is probably connected with that of the tribe called
Sammah, whose chiefs have at different epochs played a dis-
tinguished part in the valley of the Indus. In Hindu mythology
Samba is the son of Krishna. According to Plutarch, it was
some\yhere in the dominions of Sabbas that Alexander had his
interview with the ten Indian gymnosophists. Sehwan is the
Sewistan of the Arabs. According to Burton (writing in 1857), it
is a hot, filthy, and most unw^holesome place, with a rascally
population (of 6000) which includes many beggars and devotees.
V. his Sindh, p. 8. The population has since increased to upwards
of 160,000.
Note T. — City of the Brachmans — Harmatelia
This city of the Brachmans Cunningham takes to have been
Brahmana, or Brahmanabad, which was ninety miles distant by
water from Marija Dand, the point where he supposes Alexander
rejoined his fleet after the capture of Sindimana. Brahmanabad
was situated on the old channel of the Indus forty-seven miles to
the north-east of Haidarabad or Nirankot, the Patala of ancient
times. Shortly after the Mohammedan conquest it was sup-
planted by Mansilra, which either occupied its site or lay very
near it, as, according to Ibn Haukal, the place was called in
the Sindh language Bamiwan. It was destroyed by an earth-
quake sometime before the beginning of the eleventh century.
Its ruins were discovered at Bambhra-ka-thul by Mr. Bellasis*
whose excavations have shown conclusively the truth of the
popular tradition which ascribed its downfall to an earthquake.
Cunningham further thinks that Brahmanabad was the Harmatelia
of Diodoros— the place where Ptolemy was wounded by the
poisoned arrow. Harmatelia (he says) is only a softer pronuncia-
356
APPENDICES
tion of BrdJwia-thala or Brahmana-sthala, just as Hermes, the
phallic god of the Greeks, is the same as Brahma, the original
phallic god of the Indians. He thinks that the king whom
Justin (xii. lo) calls Ambiger was no other than Mousikanos,
whose dominions extended as far south as the Delta, Ambiger
being his family name and Mousikanos his dynastic title {Geog.
pp. 267-269). Saint-Martin, on the other hand, recognises Har-
matelia in a place variously designated by Arab writers Armael^
Annail, Apnabil^ and Armatel^ but of which the position is un-
known {Etude, pp. 167, 168). In his ancient map of India
Colonel Yule, who takes the same view as Saint-Martin, identifies
Harmatelia with Bela.
Note U. — Patala
The situation of Patala has been a fertile theme of controversy.
Arrian seems, no doubt, to give here a clear indication of its
position in saying that it stood near where the Indus bifurcates ;
but as this point has from time to time shifted, the controversy
has turned mainly on the question where this point is to be fixed.
The river bifurcates at present at Mottari, which lies twelve miles
above Haidarabad, and it has been known to bifurcate a little
above, and also a little below Thatha, at Bauna also, and at
Trikul. As a matter of fact, these bifurcations no longer exist,
except perhaps for a part of the year when the river is in flood
and recurs to some of its old channels. It is not then surprising
that various identifications have been proposed for Patala. It
was placed at Brahmanabad by M'Murdo, Wilson, and Lassen ;
at Thatha by Rennell, Vincent, Ritter, and the two brothers,
James and Sir Alexander Burnes ; and at Haidarabad, the
Nirankot of Arab writers, by Droysen, Benfey, Burton, Saint-
Martin, Cunningham, and Bunbury. The arguments in favour
of Haidarabad seem to be quite conclusive. They will be found
stated at length in Saint- Martin's Etude (pp. 1 68-1 91), and
Cunningham's Geography (pp. 279-287). One of the most
cogent is that the dimensions of the Delta, as given by the Greek
writers, are only justified if the apex of the Delta is taken to have
been in Alexander's time at or near Haidarabad. If the apex
had then been as high up as Brahmanabad, or as far down as
Thatha, the size of the Delta would be as grossly exaggerated in
the one case as it would be underrated in the other. The same
conclusion is indicated in the information supplied to the late
Dr. Wilson of Bombay by the Brahmans of Sehwan, that, accord-
ing to their local legends, as recorded in their Sanskrit books,
APPENDICES
357
Thatha was Beval, and Haidarabad Neran, and more anciendy
Patolpuri. Patala was thought at one time to have been a tran-
scription of the Sanskrit Patala, the 7iether world, into which the
sun descends at the end of his day's journey, and hence the
West ; but a better etymology is the Sanskrit potala, " a station
for ships," from pota, " a vessel." The name of the Indian Delta
was Patalene. Haidarabad stands on a long flat-topped hill, and
Patala, if this was its site, must have occupied a commanding
position, the advantages of which, alike for strategy and commerce,
Alexander would perceive at a glance. The main stream of the
Indus now flows to the west of this position. In the second chapter
of his Lidika Arrian repeats the statement that the Indus enters
the ocean by two mouths. Aristoboulos estimated the interval
between them at 1000 stadia, but Nearchos at 1800. The in-
terval from the west to the east arm measures at present 125
British miles. The sea-front of the Egyptian Delta with which
the Greeks compared that of the Indus Delta is not less than
160 miles. The Prince of Patala was called Moeris.
Note V. — Alexander's March through Gedrosia-Pura
" No traveller," says Bunbury, referring to the interior of Mek-
ran, " has as yet traversed its length from one end to the other
in the direction followed by Alexander. So far as we can judge,
he appears to have kept along a kind of plain or valley, which
is found to run nearly parallel to the coast between the interior
range of the Mushti (or Washati) hills and the lower ragged hills
that bound the immediate neighbourhood of the sea-coast. This
line of route has been followed in very recent times by Major
Ross from Kedj to Bela, and seems to form a natural line of
communication, keeping throughout about the required distance
(60 or 70 miles) from the coast [the distance required for main-
taining communication with the fleet]. . . . This Hne of march
so far as is yet known does not appear to traverse any such
frightful deserts of sand as those described by the historians of
Alexander. Nor can the site of Pura ... be determined with
accuracy. It has been generally identified with Bunpoor (Ban-
pur), the most important place in Western Beloochistan, or with
Pahra, a village in the same neighbourhood ; but the resemblance
of name is in this case of little value — poor signifying merely a
town — while the remoteness of Bunpoor from the sea, and its
position to the north of the central chain of mountains, which
Alexander must therefore have traversed in order to reach it,
present considerable difficulties in the way of this view " (Hist, of
358
APPENDICES
Anc. Geog. pp. 519-520). Strabo, in his chapter on Ariana,
narrates in graphic detail, like Arrian, the sufferings experienced
by the Macedonians in passing through Gedrosia. The summer,
he says, was purposely chosen for leaving India, since rains then
fall in Gedrosia, filling the rivers and wells which fail in winter.
Alexander kept at the utmost from the sea not more than 500
stadia in order to secure the coast for his fleet. The army was
saved by eating dates and the marrow of the palm-tree, but many
persons were suffocated by eating unripe dates.
To account for the surprising length of time (60 days) occupied
on this march, which could not have exceeded 400 English miles,
we must suppose that the troops were obliged to make frequent
halts at places where water was procurable. Strabo says that it
was found necessary on account of the watering-places to make
marches of two, four, and even sometimes of six hundred stadia
generally during the night. The land distances, like the sea
distances of Nearchos, seem to have been grossly exaggerated.
The march of Semiramis through this desert and that of Cyrus
seem to be mythical. Alexander's loss in men during the march
must have been exaggerated by the historians, as he brought the
bulk of his army with him to Pura.
Note W. — Indian Sages
According to Megasthenes the Indian sages were divided into
two sects, Brahmans and Sarmans. There was besides a third
sect, described as quarrelsome, fond of wrangling, foolish and
boastful. The Brahmans, he says, were held in higher esteem
than the Sarmans because there was more agreement in their
doctrines. Among the Sarmans the Hylobioi {living in woods)
were held in most honour, and next to them the physicians, who
are mendicants and also ascetics, like the class above them and
the class below them, which consisted of sorcerers and fortune-
tellers. Megasthenes has related at some length the nature of
the opinions and practices of all these sects, and Duncker con-
siders that in all essential points his accounts agree with the
native authorities, though the view taken may be here and there
too favourable, in some points too advanced, in others not suf-
ficiently discriminating. " It is true," he says, " that the Brahmans
and the initiated of the Enlightened (Buddhists), the S'ramanas,
are confounded in the order of the sages ; this is shown by the
staternent that any one could enter into this order. ... In the
description of the life of the ascetics and wandering sages, the
Brahmans and Bhikshus (mendicants) are again confounded, and
APPENDICES
359
if the Greeks tell us that the severe sages of the forest were too
proud to go to the court at the request of the king, the statement
holds good according to the evidence of the Epos of the Brahmanic
saints, and the Sutras of the great teachers among the Buddhists.
In the examination of the doctrines of the Indian sages, Megas-
thenes distinguished the Brahmans and the Buddhists, inasmuch
as he opposes the less-honoured sects to the first, and declares
the Brahmans to be the most important. From his whole ac-
count it is clear that at his date, i.e. about the year 300 b.c,
the Brahmans had distinctly the upper hand. But, according to
him, the S'ramanas took the next place to the Brahmans among
the less-honoured sects. Among the Buddhists S'ramana is the
ordinary name for their clergy" (Hist, of A7itiq. pp. 422-424).
Note X. — The Indian Month
Curtius apparently means that the Indians mark time, not by
taking a month to be the period from full moon to next full
moon, but from new moon to full moon. "The year of the
Indians (says Duncker) was divided into 12 months of 30 days ;
the month was divided into two halves of 15 days each, and the
day into 30 hours {imihurtd). In order to bring this year of 360
days into harmony with the natural time, the Brahmans estab-
lished a quinquennial cycle of i860 lunar days. Three years
had 12 months of 30 lunar days ; the third and fifth year of the
cycle had 13 months of the same number of days. The Brah-
mans do not seem to have perceived that by this arrangement
the cycle contained almost four days in excess of the astronomical
time, and indeed they were not very skilful astronomers " {v. his
History of Antiquity ^ iv. 283, 284). According to Weber this system
of calculating time was borrowed from the Babylonians, but Max
Miiller and learned Hindus hold it to be indigenous. The Indian
name for the half of a lunar month is paksha. The half from
new moon to full moon was called at first pi/rra (fore), and after-
wards szikla (bright) ; the other half was called apara (posterior),
and afterwards krishna (dark). Le Clerc concludes his criticism
of this passage thus : " Matthaeus Raderus endeavours to explain
Curtius as if he designed to demonstrate that one month began
and was understood to commence a httle after the change to the
full moon, and the next, from the time when she began to de-
crease to the next change. This, indeed, ought to be his mean-
ing ; but it is strangely expressed, when he tells us that the moon
begins to show herself horned on the sixteenth day, when 'tis
evident she does not appear so till about seven days after full
36o
APPENDICES
moon. But before Raderus, Thomas Lydiat had tried to solve
the matter othervvays. However, Scaliger, in his Prolegomena
to his Ca?i07ies Isagogicae, p. n, has plainly showed that Lydiat
neither understood Curtius nor Curtius the author which he
copied from. The ancient Persians counted 15 days to each of
their months, and 24 of these months to the solar year, before
the introduction of Mohammedism, as John Chardin evidently
demonstrates in his Itinerarmin Fersiawt, tomexi. p. 14, quarto"
{v, Rooke's Arrian, p. 12).
Note Y. — Battle with P6ros
Mr. Heitland has the following note on this passage : " Arrian
(v. 16, sec. 2) tells us that Alexander was making a flanking
movement {Trap')]kavv€v) with the bulk of his cavalry to attack
the enemy's left wing. He then goes on (sec. 3) : Against the
right wing he se?it Koinos at the head of his 07vn regimetit of horse
and that of Demetrios^ and ordered hi7ft, when the barbarians on
seeing what a dense mass of cavalry was opposed to them, should be
riding along to encounter it, to ha?ig close upon their rear^ a
hard passage, it is true, but one which need not be unintelligible
to any one who bears in mind that Alexander's movement was a
flanking one, and reads with care the description of his attack in
c. 16, sec. 4, and c. 17, sec. i, 2. The situation is this: Alex-
ander was not himself in position on the right wing, but put
Coenus there with some of the cavalry, while he himself with the
main body made the flanking movement. This he did with
speed, so as to take the Indian horse in flank, before they had
time to change their front and meet him. They tried to execute
this movement, but had not time ; and while they were in the
confusion thus brought about, Coenus fell upon what had been
their front, but was now their disordered flank. Whether the
Indian horse from their right wing was brought over to succour
that on their left or not, does not affect the probable position of
Coenus. The one difficulty in the way of this explanation is the
presence, according to Arrian, 15, sec. 7, of the war-chariots in
front of the Indian horse. But it seems easier to suppose that
Coenus was able to elude these clumsy adversaries than that
Alexander expected him to see from the Macedonian left the
right moment for his own charge, and then wheel round the rear
of the whole Indian army and execute his orders opportunely.
Diodorus, xvii. 88, says : The Macedonian cavalry began the action,
'and destroyed nearly all the chariots of the Indians? If this
^ Quoted by Heitland in the original.
Ibid.
APPENDICES
361
refers, as I think it does, to the beginning of the main battle, the
chief objection is removed" {Alexander in India, pp. 122, 123).
This explanation is different from that offered by Moberly, as the
reader will see by referring to my note on Arrian, p. 104, n. 2.
Note Z. — Indian Serpents
Diodoros gives the length of the serpents at sixteen cubits, or
about twenty-four feet. Ailianos also gives this as their length.
He says (xvii. 2) : " Kleitarchos states that about India a serpent
sixteen cubits long is produced, but mentions there is another
kind which differs in appearance from the rest. They are many
sizes shorter, and display to the eye a variety of colours, as if
they were painted with pigments. Stripes extend from the head
to the tail, and are of various colours, some tinted like bronze,
some like silver, some like gold, while others are crimson. The
same writer notices that their bite proves very quickly fatal."
Arrian in his hidika (c. 15) states on the authority of Nearchos that
there are serpents in India spotted and nimble in their move-
ments, and that one was caught which measured about sixteen
cubits, though the Indians alleged that the largest snakes were
much larger. Nearchos adds that Alexander summoned to his
camp all the Indians most expert in the healing art, and that
these succeeded in curing snake -bites, to find a remedy for
which quite baffled the skill of all the Greek physicians. Strabo
relates (XV. i. 28), that Abisaros, as the ambassadors he sent to
Alexander reported, kept two serpents, one of 80 cubits, and
the other, according to Onesikritos, of 140 cubits in length;
but Strabo no more believed in this land-serpent than we do in
the sea-serpent, for he adds that Onesikritos might as well be
called the master-fabulist as the master-pilot of Alexander. He
afterwards says that Aristoboulos saw a snake nine cubits and a
span long, and that he himself while in Egypt had seen another
of the same length which had been brought from India. Megas-
thenes wrote that serpents in India grow to such a size that they
swallow deer and oxen whole. He referred no doubt to the
python. The python of the Sunderbuns about the mouths of
the Ganges are known to swallow deer whole. The Elzevir
editor of Curtius cites statements about the size of Indian
serpents which leave the extravagant estimate of Oneskritos far
behind. Thus Maximus Tyrius {Dissert. 38) says: "Taxiles
showed Alexander various wonders, and among these was a very
large animal sacred to Bacchus, to which the Indians every day
362
APPENDICES
immolated victims. This animal was a serpent {draco), of such
a size that it equalled five acres of land."
Note Ka. — Indian Peacocks
The peacock {mayiira) abounds in India especially in the
forests at the foot of the Himalayas. Ailianos has several
notices of it in his work on animals. In Book v. 21, after he has
described its habits, and the pride it takes in displaying its
gorgeous plumage, he states that it was brought into Greece
from the barbarians. Being for a long time rare, it was exhibited
at the beginning of each month to the men and women of
Athens who were lovers of the beautiful. The charge for
admission to the spectacle was a considerable source of gain.
The price of a pair (cock and hen) was a thousand drachmas
(or about £^0 of our money). Alexander the Macedonian, on
seeing these birds in India, was so struck with admiration of
their beauty that he denounced the severest penalties against
any one who should kill them. In Book xvi. 2 he notes that
the Indian peacocks are the largest to be anywhere found. In
xiii. 18 he says: " In the palace where the greatest of all the
Indian kings resides, besides many things else which excite
admiration, eclipsing the splendour alike of Memnonian Sousa
and all the boasted magnificence of Ekbatana, there are reared
in the Royal Park tame peacocks and tame pheasants. . . .
Within that park are shady groves, grassy meads planted with
trees, and bowers woven by the craft of skilful woodmen. So
genial withal is the climate, that the trees are ever green, and
never show signs of age, nor even shed their leaves. Some are
native to the soil, while others which are brought with great care
from foreign parts, contribute to enhance the beauty of the
landscape. Not the olive, however, which is neither indigenous
to India, nor thrives if brought into it. The park is therefore
frequented by wild birds as well as by the tame. They seek its
groves from choice, and there build their nests and rear their
young. Parrots too are bred there, which, flitting to and fro,
keep hovering around the king. Notwithstanding they are so
numerous, no Indian will eat them, for they regard them as
sacred, while the Brahmans esteem them above all other birds,
and with good reason, since the parrot alone with a clear utter-
ance repeats the words of human speech." In xi. 33 he tells a
, story about a peacock of extraordinary size and beauty, which had
been sent from India as a present to the King of Egypt, who
thereupon dedicated the bird to Jupiter, the guardian god of his
APPENDICES
capital city. His work has several other passages which refer to
the peacock ; but as these have no bearing upon India we do
not cite them. The bird was introduced into Greece long before
Alexander's time, for Demos, the friend of Perikles, reared pea-
cocks at Athens, which many people came from Lacedaemon and
Thessaly to see, as we learn from Athenaios, ix. 12. It is said
that peacocks were first introduced into Greece from Samos.
Note Bb, — Indian Dogs
A breed of dogs, large, powerful, and of untamable ferocity, is
still found in the parts of India here mentioned.^ Pliny, speak-
ing of these Indian dogs, ascribes their savage disposition to the
cause mentioned by Diodoros, the tiger blood that runs in their
veins. The Indians, he says (viii. 40), assert that these dogs
are begotten from tigers, for which purpose the bitches when in
heat are tied up amid the woods. They think that the whelps
of the first and second brood are too ferocious, but they rear
those of the third. Ailianos (viii. i) varies this statement by
saying that tigers are the offspring of the first and second con-
nection, but dogs of the third. He then proceeds thus : " Dogs
that boast a tiger paternity disdain to hunt deer or to enter into an
encounter with a wild boar, but delight to assail the lion as if
to show their high pedigree. So the Indians gave Alexander, the
son of Philip, a proof of the strength and mettle of these dogs in
the manner following : They let go a deer, but the dog never
stirred ; then a boar, but he still remained impassive. Then they
tried a bear, but even this failed to rouse him to action. At last
they let go a lion. Then the dog fired with rage, as if he now
saw a worthy antagonist, did not hesitate for a moment, but flew
to encounter him, gripped him fast, and tried to strangle him.
Then the Indian who provided this spectacle for the king, and
who knew well the dog's capacity of endurance, ordered his tail
to be cut off. It was accordingly cut off, but the dog took not the
least heed. The Indian ordered next one of his legs to be cut off.
This was done, but the dog held to his grip as tenaciously as at
first, just as if the dismembered limb were not his own, but
belonged to some one else. The remaining legs were then cut off in
succession, but even all this did not in the least make him relax the
vigour of his bite. Last of all, his head was severed from the
rest of his body, but even then his teeth were seen hanging on by
^ The Rihm^yana (ii. 70. 21) the strength of the tiger and of huge
mentions among the Kaikeyas, "the body" (Dunck. iv. p. 403).
dogs bred in the palace, gifted with
364
APPENDICES
the part he had first gripped, while the head dangled aloft still
clinging to the lion, though the original biter no longer existed.
Alexander was very painfully impressed by what he saw, being lost
in admiration of the dog, since after giving proof of his mettle he
perished in no cowardly fashion, but preferring to die rather
than to let his courage give way. The Indian, seeing the king's
vexation, gave him four dogs like the one that was killed. He
was much gratified with the gift, and gave in return a suitable
equivalent. Joy at the possession of the four dogs soon obliter-
ated from the mind of Philip's son his sorrow for the other."
The same author writes nearly to the same effect in the nineteenth
chapter of his fourth book : " I reckon Indian dogs among wild
beasts, for they are of surpassing strength and ferocity, and are the
largest of all dogs. This dog despises other animals, but fights
with the lion, withstands his attacks, returns his roaring with
baying, and gives him bite for bite. In such an encounter the
dog may be worsted, but not till he has often severely galled
and wounded the lion. The lion is, however, at times worsted
by the Indian dog and killed in the chase. If a dog once
clutches a lion, he retains his hold so pertinaciously that if
one should even cut off his leg with a knife he will not let go,
however severe may be the pain he suffers, till death supervening
compels him." Aristotle, in his History of Animals (viii. 28),
refers to these Indian dogs and the story of their tigrine descent.
Even an earlier mention of them is to be found in Xenophon
{Kyn, c. 10). We may hence infer that their fame had
spread to Greece long before Alexander's time. Marco Polo
mentions a province in China where the people had a large breed
of dogs so fierce and bold that two of them together would
attack a lion — an animal with which that province abounded
(Yule's ed. ii. pp. 108, 109).
Note Cr. — The Gangaridai
This people occupied the country about the mouths of the
Ganges, and may best be described as the inhabitants of Lower
Bengal. The likeness of their name to that of the Gandaridai,
the people of Gandhara, whose seats were in the neighbourhood
of the Indus and the Kophen or Kabul river, has been the source
of much confusion and error. Fortunately the notice of them in
the Itidika of Megasthenes has been preserved both by Pliny and
Solinus, from whom we learn that they were a branch of the great
race of the Calingae, that their capital was Parthalis (Bard wan?),
and that their king had an army of 60,000 foot, 1000 horse, and
APPENDICES
365
700 elephants, which was always ready for action (Pliny, vi. 18 ;
Solin. 52). They are mentioned in Ptolemy's Geography as a
people who dwelt about the mouth of the Ganges and whose capital
was Gange. The name of the Ga?igaridai has nothing corre-
sponding with it in Sanskrit, nor can it be, as Lassen supposed,
a designation first invented by the Greeks, for Phegelas used it in
describing to Alexander the races that occupied the regions
beyond the Hyphasis. According to Saint-Martin, their name
is preserved in that of the Gonghris of S. Bihar, with whom
were connected the Gangayis of North-Western and the Gangrar
of Eastern Bengal. These designations he takes to be but vari-
ations of the name which was originally common to them all.
Wilford, in his article on the chronology of the Hindus {Asiat.
Res. V. p. 269), says that "the greatest part of Bengal was known
in Sanskrit under the name of Gancaradesa, or 'country of Gan-
cara,* from which the Greeks made Gangari-das." But this view
must be rejected on the same ground as Lassen's. The Gangaridai
are mentioned by Virgil, Georg. iii. 1. 27. As their king, at the
time when Megasthenes recorded the strength of the army
which he maintained, was subject to Magadha, w^e may infer that
Sandrokottos treated the various potentates who submitted to his
arms as Alexander treated Taxiles and Poros, permitting them to
retain as his vassals the power and dignity which they had previ-
ously enjoyed.
Note D^. — The Prasioi
The Sanskrit word Prachyas (plur. of Prachya, *' eastern ")
denoted the inhabitants of the east country, that is, the country
which lay to the east of the river Sarasvati, now the Sursooty,
which flows in a south-western direction from the mountains
bounding the north-east part of the province of Delhi till it loses
itself in the sands of the great desert. The Magadhas, it would
seem, had, before Alexander's advent to India, extended their
power as far as this river, and hence were called Prachyas by the
people who lived to the west of it. They are called by Strabo,
Arrian, and Pliny, Prasioi, Prasii\ by Plutarch, Praisioi; by
Nikolaos Damask., Praiisioi ', by Diodoros, Bresioi ; by Curtius,
Pharrasii; by Justin, Praesides. Ailianos in general writes
Praisioi like Plutarch, but in one passage where he quotes Megas-
thenes, he transcribes the name with perfect accuracy in the
adjective form as Praxiake. General Cunningham does not
agree in referring the name to Prachya, as all the other modern
writers do, but takes Prasii to be only the Greek form of Pala-
siya or Pardsiya, a "man of Paldsa or Parcisa^' a name of
366
APPENDICES
Magadha of which Palibothra was the capital. This derivation
he says, is supported by the spelling of the name given by Curtius'
who calls the people Pharrasii, an almost exact transcript of
Parasiya (see his Ancient Geog. of India, p. 454). His view,
we thmk, IS hardly destined to supplant the other. Ptolemy
describes in his Geography a small kingdom with seven cities
which he locates in the regions of the upper Ganges, and calls
Prasiake. Kanoge is one of these cities, but Palibothra is not in
the number, appearing elsewhere as the capital of the Mandalai
One IS at a loss to understand what considerations could have
led Ptolemy to push the Prasians so far from their proper seats
and transfer their capital to another people.
Note E^.— The Si
BI
The Sanskrit word S'tvi denotes a country, the inhabitants of
^M, Sivayas, may be the Sibi of Curtius and Diodoros. The
Sibi inhabited a district between the Hydaspes and the Indus
and their capital stood at a distance of about thirty miles from
the former river, and, as appears from Diodoros, above its con-
fluence with the Akesines. As they were clad with the skins of
wild beasts and were armed with clubs, they reminded the Greeks
of Herakles, who was similarly dressed and armed, and thence
arose the legend that the Sibi were the descendants of the
followers of that wandering hero. The truth, however, is that
the Sibi represent one of the chief aboriginal tribes of the re-ions
of the Indus. The Sanskrit poems and the Pauranik traditions
give this great tribe its real name S'ibi, and represent it as one of
the important branches of the race which originally peopled all
the north-western region. According to Moorcroft, the inhabitants
of the district of Bimber are called Chibs, while Baber in his
Memoirs had mentioned a people so named as belonging to the
same parts. Arrian does not expressly mention Alexander's
expedition against the Sibi in his History, but in his Indika (c c)
he thus refers to them : " So also when the Greeks came among
the Sibai, an Indian tribe, and observed that they wore skins
they declared that the Si/^ai were descended from those who
belonged to the expedition of Herakles, and had been left
behind ; for besides being dressed in skins, the Sibai carry a
cudgel and brand on their oxen the representation of a club "
In the ordinary texts of Curtius the Sih' appears as the Sobii, and
in Justin as the Si/ei, They are mentioned in the History of
Orosius (m. 19), along with a people called Gessonae, who are
evidently the people called by Diodoros the Aga/assi
APPENDICES
3^7
Note Ff. — The Agalassians
Curtius does not give the name of the people whom Alexander
proceeded to attack after he had received the submission of the
Sibi, but it is supplied by Diodoros, who calls them Agalasseis.
Saint-Martin says (Etude, p. 115) that they adjoined the eastern
side of the Sibi and occupied the country below the junction of
the Hydaspes and Akesines. Though Agalassi is the most
commonly received reading of their name, yet there are many
variant readings of it, especially in the manuscripts and editions
of Justin, where we find Agesinae, Hiacensa7iae, Argesinae, Agini,
Acenso7ii, and Gesso?iae. The last form occurs also in the History
of Orosius (iii. 19), where the people it designates are mentioned
along with the Sibi. The original name to which these may be
referred is probably Arjunayana. This name occurs between
that of the Malava (Malloi) and that of the Yaudheyas on the
Pillar at Allahabad, whereon Samudragupta, who reigned towards
the end of the 4th century a.d., inscribed the names of the
countries and peoples included in his dominions. The Arjuna-
yana are mentioned also by the Scholiast of Panini, and in the
geographical list which Wilford compiled from the Vardha
Sanhita. Arrian in his Indika (c. 4) calls the people situated
at the junction of the Hydaspes and Akesines the Arispai {Ibid.
p. 116, and footnotes).
Note G^^. — Tides in Indian Rivers
Several Indian rivers present the tidal phenomenon called the
bore, the most celebrated being those of the Brahmaputra, the
Ganges, the Nerbada, and the Indus. The bore is sometimes
many feet in height, and the noise it makes in contending
against the descending stream frightful. The bore which
rushes up the Hughli has a speed of about seventeen or eighteen
miles per hour. A vivid description of the tide or bore of the
Nerbada has been given by the author of the Peripli^s. '' India,"
he says (c. 45), "has everywhere an abundance of rivers, and her
seas ebb and flow with tides of extraordinary strength, which
increase both at new and full moon, and for three days after
each, but fall off intermediately. About Barygaza (Bharoch) they
are more violent than elsewhere ; so that all of a sudden you see
the depths laid bare and portions of the land turned into sea, and
the sea where ships were sailing but just before turned without
warning into dry land. The rivers, again, on the access of flood-
tide rushing into their channels with the whole body of the sea,
368
APPENDICES
are driven upwards against their natural course for a great many
miles with a force that is irresistible." In c. 46, after explaining
how dangerous these tides are to ships navigating the Nerbada,
he thus proceeds : " But at new moons, especially when they occur
in conjunction with a night tide, the flood sets in with such extra-
ordinary violence that on its beginning to advance, even though
the sea be calm, its roar- is heard by those living near the river's
mouth, sounding like the tumult of battle heard in the distance,
and soon after the sea with its hissing waves bursts over the bare
shoals."
Note H//. — Indian Philosophers
Arrian has given the account here promised of the Indian
sages, whom he calls Sophists, in the eleventh chapter of his
Indika. They formed the highest and most honoured of the
seven castes into which, he says, Indian society was divided.
His account is, however, very meagre compared with that which
Strabo, quoting from the same authority, Megasthenes, has given
in the fifteenth book of his Geography, We may subjoin a notice
of the more important points. The philosophers were of two
kinds, the Brachmanes and the Garmanes (S'ramanas, i.e. Buddhist
ascetics). The Brachmans were held in greater repute, as they
agreed more exactly in their opinions. They lived in a grove
outside the city, lay upon pallets of straw and on skins, abstained
from animal food and sexual intercourse. After living thirty-
seven years in this manner each individual retired to his own
possessions, led a life of greater freedom, and married as many
wives as he pleased. They discoursed much upon death, which
they held to be for philosophers a birth into a real and happy
life. They maintained that nothing which happens to a man is
bad or good, opinions being merely dreams. On many points
their notions coincided with those of the Greeks. They said, for
instance, that the world was created and liable to destruction,
that it was of a spheroidal figure, and that its Creator governed
it and was diffused through all its parts. They invented fables
also, after the manner of Plato, on the immortality of the soul,
punishments in Hades, and similar topics. Of the S'ramanas the
most honourable were the Hylobioi. These, as their name im-
ports, lived in woods, where they subsisted on leaves and wild
fruits. They were clothed with garments made of the bark of
trees, and abstained from commerce with women and from wine.
The kings held communication with them by messengers, and
through them worshipped the divinity. Next in honour to the
Hylobioi were the physicians, who cured diseases by diet rather
APPENDICES
369
than by medicinal remedies, which were chiefly unguents and
cataplasms. See XV. i. 58-60.
Arrian, in the opening chapters of the seventh book of his
Anabasis, gives an account of Alexander's dealings with the
Gymnosophists of Taxila which agrees in substance with that
given by Strabo (XV. i. 61-65) based on the authority both of
Aristoboulos and Onesikritos, the latter of whom was sent by
Alexander to converse with the gymnosophists. For the details
see Biog. Appendix, s.v. Kalanos.
Note li. — Suttee (Diod. Note 12).
But Diodoros, in a subsequent part of his history (xix. ^2>\
relates that the law had been enacted because of the great pre-
valence of the practice of wives poisoning their husbands. In
c. 34 he states that the two widows of Keteus, an Indian general
who fell in the great battle in Gabiene between Eumenes and
Antigonos, contended for the honour of being burned on the
funeral pile of their husband, and that the younger was selected
for the distinction, because the elder, being at the time with child,
was precluded by law from immolating herself. Strabo says (XV.
i. 62) that Aristoboulos and other writers make mention of Indian
wives burning themselves voluntarily with their husbands.
From this it would appear that this cruel practice, known as
Suttee (Sansk. sati, *' a devoted wife "), which was suppressed by
the humanity of the Indian Government in the days of Lord
Bentinck, was one of high antiquity, but Mr. R. C. Dutt, in his
able and learned work on Civilisation in Ancient India, assigns a
much later date to its origin. He says (vol. iii. 199) that the
barbarous rite was introduced centuries after Manu, whose Insti-
tutes, he thinks, were compiled within a century or two before or
after the Christian aera. In a subsequent passage (p. 332) he
states that Suttee was originally a Scythian custom, and was prob-
ably introduced into India by the Scythian invaders who poured
into India in the Buddhist age (from 242 b.c. to 500 a.d.), and
formed ruling Hindu races later on. There can be no doubt that
Suttee was a Scythian practice. Their kings were entombed with
sacrifices both of beasts and of human beings of both sexes, as
we see from what Herodotos relates in the seventy-first chapter of
his fourth book. Still the statement of Diodoros shows that
several centuries before the Skythian invasions of India took
place Suttee was an established institution among a race of the
purest Aryan descent such as were the Kathaians — a people
whose name shows they were Kshatriyas. The Hindus them-
2 B
370
APPENDICES
selves believe that the custom was of the very highest antiquity,
and that a text of the Rig-veda sanctioned its observance. It
has been discovered, however, that the text in question has been
falsified and mistranslated, and that in point of fact no mention
is found of the custom in Sanskrit literature till the Pauranik
period, the beginning of which Mr. Dutt assigns to the sixth cen-
tury of our aera.
Note Y^k, — Ancient Indian Coins
The following remarks on the ancient coinage of India are
extracted from two papers contributed by Mr. W. Theobald to
\\\^ Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal^ Nos. III. and IV. of
1890, under the title Notes on some of the Symbols found on the
Punch-marked Coins of Hindustan-. — "The punch-marked coins,"
he says, "though presenting neither kings' names, dates, nor inscrip-
tions of any sort, are nevertheless very interesting not only from
their being the earliest money coined in India, and of a purely
indigenous character, but from their being stamped with a number
of symbols, some of which we can with the utmost confidence
declare to have originated in distant lands and in the remotest
antiquity. The punch used to produce these coins differed from
the ordinary dies which subsequently came into use in that they
f\
Fig. 16. — Antimachos.
covered only one of the many symbols usually seen on their
pieces. Some of these coins were round and others of a rect-
angular form. The great bulk of these coins is silver (but some
copper, and others gold). Some coins are formed of a copper
blank thickly covered with silver before receiving the impression
of the punches, and this contemporary sophistication of the cur-
rency is found to occur subsequently in various Indian coinages,
in the Graeco-Bactrian of the Panjab, the Hindu kings of Cabul,
APPENDICES
371
etc." Mr. Theobald thinks we may regard these pieces as a por-
tion of those very coins (or identical in all respects) which the
Brahman Chanakya, the adviser of Chandragupta, with the view
of raising resources, converted, by recoining each Kahapana into
eight, and amassed eighty kotis of Kahapanas (or Karshapanas).
Mr. Theobald holds that the square coins, both silver and copper,
— «*n:;
iXi
"Fig. 17. — Agathokl^s.
struck by the Greeks for their Indian possessions belong to no
Greek national type whatever, but are obviously a novelty adopted
in imitation of an indigenous currency already firmly established
in the country. He adduces by way of proof the testimony of
Curtius, where he states that Taxiles offered Alexander eighty
talents of coined silver {signati argenti). What other, he asks,
except these punch-marked coins could these pieces of coined
silver have been ? The name, he then adds, by which these
coins are spoken of in the Buddhist Sutras about 200 B.C. was
■j'^^
Fig. 18. — Hkliokles.
" purana " = old, whence General Cunningham argues that the word
old, as applied to the indigenous Karsha, was used to distinguish
it from the new and more recent issues of the Greeks. Mr.
Vincent A. Smith writes to the same effect. He considers the
artistic coins to be of Greek origin, but holds that the idea of
coining money, and the simple mechanical processes for rude
372
APPENDICES
APPENDICES
373
coins, were not borrowed from the Greeks. It is, he thinks,
impossible to prove that any given piece is older than Alexander,
though some primitive coins may be older. The oldest Indian
coins to which a date can be assigned are, in his opinion, those
issued by Sophytes, the contemporary of Alexander. The
general adoption of Greek, or Graeko-Roman types of coinage,
he assigns to the first century as a result of the Indo-Skythian
-m^j
^>*'
r
»./#
3^ i
.j.^
r-^'
xi:^.;^-
r
■%
"-m/'?.
invasions,
of India.
Fig. 19. — ApoLLODOTOb.
Roman coins, it is well known, are found in all parts
In Indian writings the Roman denarius appears in the
form dindra, and the Greek drachine (which was about equivalent
in value to the denarius) in the form dramma. The subject of
the Indo-Greek coinage is discussed in A. v. Ballet's Die Nach-
folger Alexanders.
Note L/. — An As 'oka Inscription
Transliteration. — yu Ichha
shavabhu .... shayama shamachaliyaih madava ti. lyam
vu mu .
Devanam Piyesha ye dhammavijaye she cha puna ladhe Dev-
anaih Pi . . . cha
shaveshu cha ateshu a shashu pi yojanashateshu ata Atiyoge
nama Yona laja palam cha tena
Amtiyogena chatali 4 lajane Tulamaye nama Ariitekine nama
Maka na ma Alikyashudale nama, nicham Choda-Pamdiya
avam Tarhbapamniya hevameva hevameva
Hidalaja. Vis'a-Vaji-Yona-Kambijeshu Nabhake Nabhapamtishu
Boja-Pitinikyeshu
Adha-Puladeshu shavata Devanam Piyasha dhammamanushathi
anuvatamti.
Translation. — The following is considered of the highest im-
portance by the God-beloved, namely Conquest by law; this
Conquest, however, is made by the God-beloved as well here
2
o
Z
<
<
O
6
374
APPENDICES
{in his own kingdom) as among all his neighbours, even as far
as six hundred yojanas {leagues), where the King of the Yonas
{Greeks), Antiyoka by name, dwells; and beyond this Antiyoka
where the four kings, Turamaya by name, Amtikina by name,
Maka by name, Alikasudara by name (dwell farther away) in the
south, where the Chodas and Paindas {Pandyas) (dwell), as far
as Tambapanini {Ceylon) (where) the Hida king (dwells). Among
the Vis'as, the Vajris {Vrijis\ the Yonas {Greeks), the Kamboyas
{Kdbulis), in Nabhaka of the Nabhitis, among the Bhojas, the
Pitinikas, the Andhras and the Puladas {PuHndas), the teaching
of the law of the God-beloved is universally followed.
This remarkable edict is found inscribed at four different
places : Shahbazgarhi in Yusufzai, Mansahra in Hazara of the
Panjab, Kalsi above Dehra Dun, and Girnar in Kathiawar. In
the first two places the character employed is the Karoshtri,
that is, the Baktrian Pali, and in the other two the Indian Pali!
It is the Kalsi inscription which is copied in the illustration. By
the God-beloved (Piyesha or Piyadasi) is meant As 'oka himself.
The Grecian kings named in the inscription have already been
identified (p. 52), with the exception of Alikyashudale, who is
taken to be Alexander, King of Epeiros. v. Senart's Les Inscrip-
tions de Piyadasi and Epigraphia Indica, vol. ii.
BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX
Abisares is called by Arrian the King of the Indian Mountaineers,
and may perhaps be not improperly described as the King of
Kashmir. His name is derived from that of his kingdom, Abhisara,
which designated the mountainous country to the east of the
Indus now known as Hazara, a name in which some traces of
the old seem to survive. After the fall of Mazaga, he sent troops
across the Indus to aid the inhabitants in resisting Alexander.
He sent embassies, however, to the conqueror both before and
after the defeat of Poros, whom he inclined to succour. Alex-
ander allowed him to retain his kingdom, and when he died
appointed his son to succeed him, as we learn from Curtius X. i.
Aggrammes. — See Xandrames.
Alketas was the brother of Perdikkas, who, after Alexander's
death, assumed the regency of the empire. He was the son of
Orontes, a Macedonian of the province of Orestis. He is first
mentioned by Arrian as commander of one of the brigades which
Alexander, towards the close of his Baktrian campaigns, despatched
under Krateros into the country of the Paratakenians, who still
held out against him. He is next mentioned in connection with the
siege of Mazaga and Ora. When Alexander crossed the Hydaspes
to encounter Poros, Alketas remained behind in the camp with
Krateros. After Alexander's death Alketas supported the cause
of his brother, and by his orders put to death Kynane, the half-
sister of Alexander — a cruel act which his own troops resented.
When Perdikkas was murdered in Egypt (321 B.C.) Alketas was
at the time with Eumenes engaged against Krateros. He after-
wards, however, joined his forces to those of Attalos ; but being
defeated in Pisidia, he slew himself to avoid falling into the hands
of Antigonos.
Ambiger, supposed to be a corrupt reading for Ambi-regis.
— See under Sambus.
Amyntas, the son of Nikolaos, was appointed satrap of
2>7(>
APPENDICES
Baktria in succession to Artabazos, who resigned the office on the
ground of his advanced age. When Alexander left Baktria to
invade India he left Amyntas in the province with a force of
10,000 foot and 3500 horse.
Androkottos.— ^(f^ Sandrokottos.
Androsthenes, a native of Thasos, sailed with Nearchos, and
was afterwards sent by Alexander to explore the Persian Gulf.
He wrote an account of this voyage, and a work describing a
coasting voyage to India.
Antigenes, an officer who served both under Philip and
Alexander. In 340 b.c. he lost an eye at the siege of Perinthos.
He was present in the battle with Poros, and the divisions of the
phalanx which he led on this occasion formed afterwards part of
the large body of troops which Krateros led through the country
of the Arachotians and Zarangians into Karmania. After the
army reached Sousa he was for some time deprived of his com-
mand for having advanced some fraudulent claim. After Alex-
ander's death he obtained the satrapy of Sousiana. In the wars
between the generals he sided with Eumenes, whom he aided
with the Argyraspids under his command. When Eumenes was
defeated in 316 b.c. Antigenes fell into the hands of his enemy,
Antigonos, who ordered him to be burned to death.
Antigonos, called the One-eyed, was a Macedonian of
Elimiotis, and one of the generals of Alexander, but did not
accompany him into India, as he had been appointed satrap of
Phrygia. In the partition of the empire he received Phrygia,
Lykia, and Pamphylia, and eventually made himself master of
the whole of Asia Minor. He was slain in the battle of Ipsos
301 B.C. He was the father of Demetrios Poliorketes, who
founded a line of Macedonian kings.
Antigonos Gonatas was one of the kings to whom As oka
.vi
V
Fig. 21.— Antigonos Gonatas.
sent Buddhist missionaries. He was the son of Demetrios
Poliorketes, whom he succeeded as king of Macedonia in the
APPENDICES
377
year 283 b.c. His reign extended to forty -four years. His
brother Antigonos Doson reigned afterwards over Macedonia for
^
'V-^
^-X"
V
Wite^
Fig. 22. — Antigonos Doson.
nine years, from 229 to 220 b.c., in succession to Demetrios II.
the son of Gonatas.
Antiochos II., surnamed Theos, succeeded to the throne of
Syria on the death of his father Antiochos I., who was the son of
the famous Seleukos Nikator. During many years of his reign
he was engaged in intermittent hostilities with Ptolemy Phila-
delphos the king of Egypt, who wrested from him Phoenicia and
Hollow Syria. His power was further weakened by the revolt of
Fig. 23. — Antiochos II.
Arsakes, who established the Parthian empire (in 250 b.c), and
by the subsequent revolt of Theodotos, who made Baktria an
independent kingdom. He was one of the kings of the West to
whom Buddhist missionaries were sent by the Indian king
As'oka. His wife Laodike caused him to be murdered in
B.c. 246.
Anti PATER. — This officer, who had great experience in war
and civil affairs under Philip, was left regent of Macedonia when
Alexander set out on his Asiatic expedition. Olympias, jealous
of his power, was constantly engaged in intrigues against him.
378
APPENDICES
while she annoyed her son by filling her letters to him with com-
plaints against his deputy. After the murder of Perdikkas in
Egypt, Antipater succeeded him in the regency of the empire,
and this he held till his death in 320 b.c.
Aphrikes, called Eryx by Curtius, was the same whom Arrian
designates the brother of Assakcnos, the king of Mazaga. He
was put to death by his own followers.
Apollonios, a native of Tyana in Kappadokia, was born in
the year 4 b.c. He adopted the Pythagorean system of philo-
sophy, and submitted himself to its ascetic discipline. He was
credited with the possession of supernatural powers, and parallels
have been drawn between his character and supposed miracles
and those of Christ. He travelled in the East, and is said to
have visited Taxila, the capital of Phraortes, an Indian prince,
where he met larchas, the chief of the Brahmans, and disputed
with Indian gymnosophists. About a hundred years after his
death an account of his life was written by Philostratos, which,
notwithstanding that much of it is untrustworthy, is of great value
for the investigation of Indian antiquity.
Apollophanes was appointed satrap of the Oritians, but was
deposed not long afterwards by Alexander for misgovernment.
Ariobarzanes was the satrap of Persis. After the defeat of
the Persians near Arbela, he fled to secure the pass called the
Persian Gates, which lay on the route to Persepolis. Alexander
having gained the heights above his camp, the Persians took to
flight, and Ariobarzanes made his escape with a few horsemen.
Aristoboulos was a native of Kassandreia, a town on the
isthmus which connects the peninsula of Pallene with the main-
land. He accompanied Alexander in his Asiatic expedition, and
wrote a history of his wars, which was one of the principal sources
used by Arrian in the composition of his Anabasis, and by Plutarch
in his Life of Alexander. Arrian, in the preface to his great work,
thus characterises the two authors whom he mainly followed :
" Diff'erent authors have differed in their accounts of Alexander's
life. . . . But I consider the narratives of Ptolemy and Aristo-
boulos to be more worthy of credit than the rest ; Aristoboulos,
because he attended Alexander in his expedition ; and Ptolemy,
not only for that reason, but also because he was afterwards him-
self a king, and for one in his position to have falsified facts
would have been more disgraceful than for a man of humbler
rank. Both of them, moreover, compiled their histories after
Alexander was dead, when they were neither compelled, nor
tempted by hope of reward, to misrepresent facts, and on this
account they are the more worthy of credit." Lucian, neverthe-
APPENDICES
379
less, accuses Aristoboulos of having invented marvellous stories
of Alexander's prowess in battle ; but it is thought that in the
anecdote which he relates in this connection he has used by mis-
take the name of Aristoboulos for that of Onesikritos. See
Lucian's How History should be Written, c. 1 2. It is said that
Aristoboulos began the composition of his history when he was
84 years old, and that he lived to be 90.
Aristonous was, like Alexander, a native of Pella, and was
one of the seven or eight chief officers who formed his body-
guard, and had at all times access to his presence. According
to Curtius he was one of the men who helped to save Alexander's
life when he was assailed and wounded by the Mallians in their
chief stronghold. On the death of Alexander he advocated the
claims of Perdikkas to the supremacy. After the fall of Olympias,
to whose cause he had attached himself, he was put to death by
order of her antagonist, Kassander, in the year 316 b.c.
Aristotle was born in 384 b.c. at Stageira, a seaport town
near the isthmus which connects the peninsula terminating in
Mount Athos with the mainland of Macedonia. When he was
studying philosophy in Athens under Plato he received a letter
from King Philip announcing the birth of his son Alexander. This
letter has been preserved by Aulus Gellius in his Nodes Atticae
(ix. 3) : — " Philip to Aristotle greeting : know that a son has been
born to me. I thank the gods, not so much for his birth, as
that it has been his fortune to be born when you are in the prime
of life ; for I hope that being instructed and educated by you, he
will prove himself worthy both of us and of the succession to so
great a state." Thirteen years afterwards Philip summoned the
great philosopher to his court, and entrusted him with the educa-
tion of his son, which was conducted in quiet seclusion at Stageira,
at a distance from Pella, the centre of political activity and court
intrigue. Here Alexander remained for four years, at the end of
which he was called to govern the kingdom during his father's
temporary absence on an expedition against Byzantium. Along
with him were educated other noble youths, Kassander, son of
Antipater; Marsyas of Pella; Kallisthenes, who was related to
Aristotle ; Theophrastos, and probably also Nearchos, Ptolemy,
and Harpalos. The course of instruction embraced poetry,
eloquence, and philosophy, and, no doubt, also politics, though
one of the leading aims of Alexander in after life, that of uniting
all the nations under his sway into one kingdom without due
regard to their individual peculiarities, was opposed to the views
of his master. Alexander regarded Aristotle with sentiments
of the deepest respect and affiection, and rewarded him for his
38o
APPENDICES
instructions with a munificence which has never been surpassed.
Pliny mentions how Hberally he supported the philosopher in
his researches into natural science, especially in the department
of zoology, ordering his vicegerents everywhere to supply him
with specimens of all kinds of animals. Unhappily the cordiality
between them was interrupted when Kallisthenes began to express
disapproval of the change in Alexander's conduct and policy.
Aristotle died at the age of 6;^, about a year after the death of
his pupil.
Arsakes was the ruler of a small mountain kingdom which
adjoined that of his brother Abisares, King of Kashmir.
Artabazos was a Persian satrap, who fcJr some years main-
tained a war of rebellion against Artaxerxes III. In the reign of
Darius he distinguished himself by his fidelity to his sovereign.
He took part in the battle of Gaugamela, and afterwards accom-
panied Darius in his flight. Alexander, who approved of his
fidelity to his master, rewarded him with the satrapy of Baktria.
Ptolemy married one of his daughters and Eumenes another.
He resigned his satrapy on account of his great age, and was
succeeded by Kleitos.
Artemidoros was a Greek geographer who lived about loo
B.C. His work on geography was abridged by Markianos. Some
fragments of the work, which was of high value, and of the
abridgment, have been preserved by Strabo and other writers.
AsKLEPios (Aesculapius) was the god of the medical art. His
descendants were called Asklepiadai, and had their principal
seats at Kos and Knidos. The Asklepiads were not only a
fraternity of physicians, but an order of priests, who combined
religion with the practice of their art.
As'oKA was the son of Vindusara and grandson of Chandra-
gupta, called Sandrokottos by the Greeks. He ascended the
throne of Magadha in 270 B.C. Having been converted to
Buddhism, he established that faith as the state religion of his vast
empire, which comprised the greater part of India. He was
zealous in promoting the spread of his creed, and even sent
missionaries to expound its doctrines to the sovereigns of the
West, Antiochos of Syria, Ptolemy of Egypt, Antigonos of Mace-
donia, Magas of Kyrene and Alexander of Epiros. His religious
zeal, piety, and benevolence inspire all the many edicts he pro-
mulgated, which are still to be read cut on rocks, caves, and
pillars. The date of his death is uncertain, but is referred to the
year 222 b.c. His inscriptions are invaluable for the aid they
contribute towards the solution of some of the most important
and difficult problems with which the investigators of Indian
APPENDICES
381
antiquity have to deal. They throw light on many points of
historical, chronological, and linguistic inquiry, as well as on
others having reference to the social, political, and religious
condition of the Indian people in the days when Buddhism first
rose to the ascendant. An account of these inscriptions will be
found in Lassen's AU. Ind. ii. pp. 215-223.
AssAGETES was, Lassen thinks, an Assakenian chief. His
name probably transliterates Asvajit\ according to the same
authority the word would mean " conquered by the horse."
AssAKANOS, the King of Mazaga, the capital of the Assa-
kenians. According to Arrian he was slain during the siege of
that stronghold by Alexander, but Curtius leads us to believe that
he had died before the conqueror's advent.
AsTES, the chief of Peukelaotis, submitted to Alexander when
he entered India, but afterwards revolted and was slain by the
troops under Hephaistion.
Ath£:naios was the author of the Deipnosophists^ i.e. the
Banquet of the Learned^ or, perhaps, the Contrivers of Feasts.
This w^ork is described by a writer in Smith's Classical Dictionary
as a vast collection of anecdotes, extracts from the writings of
poets, historians, dramatists, philosophers, orators, and physicians,
of facts in natural history, criticisms and discussions on almost
every conceivable subject, especially on gastronomy. It contains
numerous references to Alexander and the events of his time.
Athenaios was a native of Naukratis, in Lower Egypt. He wrote
in the earlier part of the third century of our aera.
Athenodoros was the leader of the sedition of the Greek
colonists settled in Baktria who were anxious to return to their
native country.
Attalos. — Three persons of this name are mentioned in this
work :
1. Attalos^ one of the generals of King Philip, and uncle of
Kleopatra, whom that king married in 337 b.c. At the nuptial
festivities, Attalos requested the guests to pray to the gods that a
legitimate heir to the throne might be the fruit of the marriage.
This naturally gave great offence to Alexander and his mother,
Olympias, who both in consequence withdrew from the kingdom.
Attalos was in Asia at the time of Philip's death, and was in-
stigated by Demosthenes to rebel against his successor. Alexander
then caused him to be assassinated. It will be seen from what
has been stated that the royal house of Macedonia practised
polygamy.
2. Attalos^ who commanded the Agrianians in the battles of
Issos and Gaugamela.
382
APPENDICES
3. Attalos, the son of Andromenes of Stymphalia, a district in
Macedonia, or on its borders, was one of Alexander's chief
officers. He was accused, along with his brothers, of complicity
with Philotas in his alleged conspiracy, but was honourably
acquitted. In 328 b.c. he was left with other officers to hold
Baktria in subjection, while Alexander himself marched against
the Sogdians. In the campaign of 327 b.c. against the Assa-
kenians and other tribes north of the Kabul River, Attalos served
in the division of the array which Alexander commanded in person
He took part in the great battle in which the Assakenians were
defeated, and in the siege of Ora. He fought also in the battle
against Poros. His division formed part of the troops which
Krateros led by the route of the Bolan Pass into Karmania
After Alexander's death he supported Perdikkas, whose sister he
had married. After the murder of Perdikkas he joined Alketas
his brother-in-law, but their united forces were defeated by
Antigonos in Pisidia. Alketas was seized and imprisoned. His
ultimate fate is unknown.
Baiton, one of the scientific men in Alexander's army
employed, like Diognetos, in measuring the distances traversed
in Its marches, whence he was called Alexander's bhnatistes He
left a professional work, which, as we learn from Athenaios (x p
442) was entitled Stages of Alexander's Marches.
Balakros.— There were three officers of this name in Alex-
ander's army. i. The son of Nikanor, who was a Somatophylax
and was appointed satrap of Kilikia after the battle of Issos He
was slain in Pisidia in Alexander's lifetime. 2. The son of
Amyntas was commander of the allies in succession to Antigonos
and commander, along with Peukestas, of the army which Alex-
ander left in Egypt. 3. A commander of the javelin men who
took part m the great battle with the Aspasians.
Barsine, called also Stateira, was the elder daughter of Darius
and became the wife of Alexander at Sousa, 324 b.c. Within a
year of Alexander's death she was treacherously murdered bv
Roxana. ^
Barzaentes, satrap of the Arachosians and Drangians was
one of the murderers of Darius. To escape Alexander he fled to
India, but was given up by the inhabitants to Alexander, who
ordered his death.
Bessos, the satrap of Baktria, commanded the left wing of
the Persian army at Arbela, and was thus directly opposed to
Alexander himself in that battle. After the battle he conspired
against his unfortunate master, who was also his kinsman and
APPENDICES
383
caused him to be assassinated lest he should fall into Alexander's
hands — a result which would have frustrated his design of
mounting the vacant throne. He fled across the Oxus, but was
betrayed and delivered up to Alexander, who caused him to be
tried before a council at Zariaspa, and after sufl'ering mutilation
to be executed.
Chandragupta. — See Sandrokottos.
Chares, or Cares, a native of Mytilene in Lesbos, was an officer
with Alexander who discharged the functions of court usher. He
wrote a book (now lost) of anecdotes about Alexander's wars and
private life, which is frequently quoted by Athenaios. Some
fragments have also been preserved by Plutarch, Pliny, and
Aulus Gellius.
Cleophis, Queen of Mazaga, surrendered that city to Alex-
ander, by whom she was kindly treated, and to whom she is said
to have borne a son who became an Indian king. In Racine's
XX2i%.^%
'S-^
^
/
Fig. 24. — Demetrios Poliorketes.
384
APPENDICES
DiosKORiDES, the famous writer on Materia Medica, was a
native of Kilikia, and flourished, so far as can be conjectured,
about the beginning of the second century of our aera.
Embisaros. — See Abisares.
Epikt^tos, the famous philosopher, was a native of Hiero-
polis in Phrygia, and a freedman of Epaphroditus, the favourite
of Nero. Arrian, who was one of his disciples, composed a short
manual of his philosophy as taken down from his lectures, and
known as the Enchiridmi.
Eratosthenes was appointed by Ptolemy Euergetes (grand-
son of Alexander's Ptolemy) president of the Alexandrian Library,
an office which he held for upwards of forty years. He may be
considered as the founder of scientific geography, and in some
measure also of systematic chronology. He was born at Kyrene
in 276 B.C., and educated in Athens, where he devoted himself
to the study of learning and philosophy. He died in Alexandria
in the year 196 b.c His works, which were numerous and
treated of a great variety of subjects, scientific and literary, have
perished, with the exception of some fragments cited by other
writers.
Erigyios was by birth a Mitylenaian, and was an officer in
Alexander's army. He commanded the cavalry of the allies both
in the battle of Arbela and when Alexander set out from Ekbatana
in pursuit of Darius. He was slain fighting with Baktrian
fugitives.
EudI:mos.— When Alexander heard in Karmania that Philip,
who had been left in India as satrap, had been treacherously
murdered by the mercenaries, he sent orders to Taxiles and
Eudemos to administer affairs till a new satrap should be ap-
pointed. Sometime after Alexander's death Eudemos decoyed
Poros into his power and cut him off. He then left India either
because Eumenes requiring his services in contending against
Antigonos recalled him, or because he was unable to hold out
against the native revolt headed by Sandrokottos. The troops
and elephants which he took with him from India were of great
service to Eumenes. After the fall of his chief Eudemos was
put to death by Antigonos.
Eumenes was a native of Kardia, a Greek colony situated in
the Thracian Chersonese. He was private secretary to King
Philip, and then to Alexander, whom he attended throughout his
Asiatic expedition. It was one of his duties as royal secretary
lo keep a diary {Ephhnerides) in which the transactions of each
day had to be recorded, and this work is quoted both by Arrian
APPENDICES
385
and Plutarch. He showed himself a man of consummate ability
in the arts both of war and of politics. His alien origin, how-
ever, exposed him to the jealousy of the Macedonian officers.
Hephaistion in particular, Alexander's chief favourite, sought by
every means to compass his overthrow. Eumenes, however, by his
prudence and tact frustrated all attempts made to undermine his
influence with the king who had a just appreciation of his merits.
Though his labours were chiefly those of the closet, he was some-
times employed in the field, more especially on occasions of
unusual emergency. When Alexander, on returning to Sousa,
celebrated his own nuptials and those of his companions with
oriental brides, he gave, as Arrian tells us (vi. 4), to Ptolemy, and
Eumenes, the royal secretary, the daughters of Artabazos ; to the
former Artikama, and to the latter Artonis. After the king's
death Eumenes obtained Kappadokia, Paphlagonia, and Pontos,
and after some delay was established in the government of these
provinces. After the death of Perdikkas, to whom he owed this
service, he was requested by Olympias and Polysperchon to
undertake the supreme command throughout Asia on behalf of
the king. He had in consequence to contend against the faction
opposed to the royal family which was headed by Antigonos, and
supported by Ptolemy, Peithon, Seleukos, and Nearchos. After
coping successfully for a considerable time against this powerful
confederacy, he was dehvered up by his own troops to Antigonos,
who, notwithstanding the remonstrances of Nearchos, ordered
him to be put to death, 316 b.c.
GoRGiAS, a commander of a division of the phalanx. He
marched with Hephaistion and Perdikkas by the Khaiber Pass to
the Indus, and fought in the battle against Poros.
Harpalos was of princely birth, and nephew of King Philip.
He was educated along with Alexander, whom he accompanied
into Asia in the capacity of superintendent of his treasury.
Having betrayed his trust he fled to Greece, but was recalled by
Alexander, who overlooked his offence and reinstated him in his
office. Alexander, on setting out from Ekbatana to pursue
Darius, left Harpalos in that stronghold in charge of the vast
treasures which had been transported thither from Sousa and
other plundered capitals. Harpalos removed thence to Babylon,
where he ruled as satrap while the king was in India. Here his
licentiousness and extravagance exceeded all bounds. On hear-
ing that Alexander had returned to Sousa, and was punishing
with the utmost severity all officers who had misgoverned in his
2 C
386
APPENDICES
absence, he set out for the coast, taking with him the vast sum
of 5000 talents and a large escort of troops. He crossed over
to Attica, but the Athenians would not permit him to land until
he had disbanded his followers. When he .was admitted into
the city he employed his wealth in bribing the orators to gain
over the people to his cause in opposition to Alexander. He
was, however, obliged to take to flight, and having landed with
his treasures in the island of Crete, was there assassinated.
Hekataios, one of the earliest and most distinguished
Greek historians and geographers, was a native of Miletos,
and lived about 520 b.c. He is the first Greek writer who dis-
tinctly mentions India. Some fragments of his works have been
preserved.
Hephaisti6n was a native of Pella, and in his childhood
appears to have been brought up with Alexander, who was of
the same age as he, and not only continued to be his friend
through life, but lavished upon him when removed by death the
most extravagant honours. In the Egyptian expedition he com-
manded the fleet, and he distinguished himself in the battle of
Arbela, where he was wounded in the arm. When Philotas was
put to death the command of the horse guards was divided be-
tween him and Kleitos. He conducted important operations in
Sogdiana and Baktria, and throughout all the subsequent cam-
paigns until the army returned to Sousa. He was not possessed
of any striking share of ability, and would certainly not have
risen to eminence through his own unaided exertions. At Sousa
Alexander gave him to wife Drypatis, one of the daughters of
Darius, and the sister of Stateira, whom he himself married.
Hephaistion was soon afterwards cut off by fever at Ekbatana.
Herakon, one of Alexander's officers, w^as appointed with
two others to command the army in Media on the death of
Parmenion. During Alexander's absence in the far east he com-
mitted many excesses, for which he was put to death on Alex-
ander's return from India.
Kalanos was a gymnosophist of Taxila, w ho left India with
Alej^nd ^r, and bu rned himself alive on aJuneral pile at Sousa.
His real name, PlutarCh-sayv^s Sphincs ; but the Greeks called
him Kalanos, because, in saluting those he met, he used the word
ka/e/ equivalent to /lat'// The Sanskrit adjective kalydna means
salutary, lucky, well, etc. If we except Sandrokottos, Taxiles, and
Poros, there is no other Indian with whose history, opinions, and
personal characteristics the classical writers have made us so well
acquainted as with those of Kalanos. For this reason, as well
APPENDICES
387
as because it falls properly within the scope of my undertaking to
do so, I shall here present translations of all the passages I can
find wh ichj;elate to him^ and to another gymnosophist who was
a man' of a very different stamp called Mandanes, and sometimes,
butunproperly, Z>^;?^a;;«V. Arrian (VII. i. 5-iii.) thus writes : — i. 5.
Fcbmmend the Indian sages of whom it is related that certain of
them who had been caught by Alexander walking about according
to their wont in the open meadow, did nothing else in sight of
himself and his army but stamp upon the ground on which
they were stepping. When he asked them through interpreters
w"hat they meant by so doing, they replied thus : O King Alex-
ander, each man possesses as much of the earth as what we have
stepped on ; but you, being a man like the rest of us, except that
you wickedly disturb the peace of the world, have come so far
from home to plague yourself and every one else, and yet ere
long when you die you will possess just so much of the earth as
will suffice to make a grave to cover your bones, ii. Alexander
praised what they had said, but nevertheless continued to act in
opposition to their advice. . . . When he arrived at Taxila and
saw the Indian gymnosophists, he conceived a great desire that
one of their number should live with him, because he admired
their patience in enduring hardships. But the oldest of the
philosophers, Dandamis by name, with whom the others lived as
disciples, not only refused to go himself, but forbade the others to
go. Hejs sa[d.tp have replied that he was also a son oj Ze us,
i f Alexan der was such, ^ and that he wanted nothing thatvvas
AlexandeFs^T for he was content with what he had, while hesaw
thatlHe men with Alexander wandered over sea and land for no
advantage, and were never coming to an end of their wanderings.
He desired, therefore, nothing it was in Alexander's power to
give : nor did he fear being excluded from anything he possessed \
for while he lived, India would suffice for him, yielding him her
fruits in due season, and when he died he would be delivered
from the body an unsuitable companion. Alexander accordingly
did not attempt to compel him to go with him, considering him
free to please himself. But Megasthenes hns gfnf^H that Kalanos,
one^ of the philosophers oTThis^place, was persuaded to go since
he had no power of self-control, as the philosophers .themselves
allowed, who upbraided him because he had deserted the happi-
ness among them, and went to serve another master than the
deity, iii. I have thus written, because in a History of Alexander
it was necessary to speak of Kalanos ; for when he was in the
^ Referring to the terms in which he was summoned to go to Alexander.
He was to go to "the son of Zeus."
388
APPENDICES
country of Persis he fell into delicate health, though he had never
before had an illness. Accordingly, as he had no wish to lead
the life of an invalid, he informed Alexander that, broken as he
was in health, he thought it best to put an end to himself before
he had experience of any malady that would oblige him to change
his former mode of life. Alexander long and earnestly opposed
his request ; but when he saw that he was quite inflexible, and
that if one mode of death was denied him he would find another,
he ordered a funeral pyre to be piled up in accordance with the
man's own directions, and ordered Ptolemy, the son of Lagos,
one of the bodyguards, to superintend all the arrangements.
Some say that a solemn procession of horses and men advanced
before him, some of the men being armed, while others carried
all kinds of incense for the pyre. Others again say that they
carried gold and silver bowls and royal apparel ; also, that a
horse was provided for him because he was unable to walk from
illness. He was, however, unable to mount the horse, and he was
therefore carried on a litter crowned with a garland, after the manner
of the Indians, and singing in the Indian tongue. The Indians
say that what he sang were hymns to the gods and the praises
of his countrymen, and that the horse which he was to have
mounted — a Nesaian steed of the royal stud — he presented to
Lysimachos who attended him for instruction in philosophy. On
others who attended him he bestowed the bowls and rugs which
Alexander, to honour him, had ordered to be cast into the pyre.
Then mounting the pile, he lay down upon it in a becoming
manner in full view of the whole army. Alexander deemed the
spectacle one which he could not with propriety witness, because
the man to sufter was his friend ; but to those who were present
Kalanos caused astonishment in that he did not move any part
of his body in the fire. As soon as the men charged with the
duty set fire to the pile, the trumpets, Nearchos says, sounded by
Alexander's order, and the whole army raised the war-shout as if
advancing to battle. The elephants also swelled the noise with
their shrill and warlike cry to do honour to Kalanos.
^" n fillh^^^qillf"^ chapter (xviii.) Arrian records th e f ollowing
S tory of ^^Ifi u ft^ - When he was going to the funeral^yre to die,
he embraced all his other companions, but did not wisK to draw
near to Alexander to give him a parting embrace, saying he woul d
meet him at Babylon and would there embrace hi m. Thi s
remark attracted no notice at the time ; but afterwar.ds, when
Alexander died in Babylon, it came back to the memory of tho^e
who heard it, who then naturally took it to have been a prophecy
of his death. Plutarch, in his Life of AUxamLr^ Ims; nnnthpr
APPENDICES
389
n otice of Kalanos besides that which the reader will^ndjtrans-
lated in chapter 65. In chapter 69 he thus writes: "It was
here (in Persepolis) that Kalanos, on being for a short time
afflicted with colic, desired to have his funeral pile erected. He
was conveyed to it on horseback, and after he had prayed and
spfinkled himself with a libation, and cut off part of his hair to
cast into the fire, he ascended the pile, after taking leave of the
Macedonians, and recommendini? them to devote that day to
pleasure and hard drinking with the king, whom, said he, I shall
shortly see in Babylon. Upon this he la y ^own on the pyre and
c overed hims elf up with his robes. When the flames approached
he did n ot niDvc, out remained In the same posture as when he
l ay gown until the sacrifice was auspiciously consummated, accord-
i ng to t he custom of the sages of his country. Many years after-
w^ards another Indian in the presence of Caesar (Augustus) at^
Athens did the same thing. Jli^ ^<^mh JJS Rhmyn t ^']l Vhig ci^y^ and
is _ called the Indian's tomb. — Alexander, on returning from the
pyre, invited many of his friends and his generals to supper,
^^HereTTeTpfoposed a drintlng-bout, with a crown for the prize.
Promachos, who drank most, reached four measures (14 quarts),
and w on the crown, which was worth a talent, but survived.. only
for three day s. The rest of the guests, Chares says, drank to
such excess that forty-one of them died, the weather having
t urned e xcess ively cold immediately after the debauch." The
Indian who burned himself at Athens was called Zarmanochegas^
as we learn from Strabo (XV. i. 73), who states, on the authority
of Nikolaos of Damascus, that he came to Syria in the train of
the ambassadors who were sent to Augustus Caesar by a great
Indian king called Poros. "These ambassadors," he says, "were
accompanied by the person who burnt himself to death at Athens.
This is the practice with persons in distress, who seek escape
from existing calamities, and with others in prosperous circum-
stances, as was the case with this man. For as everything
hitherto had succeeded with him, he thought it necessary to
depart, lest some unexpected calamity should happen to him by
continuing to live ; with a smile, therefore, naked, anointed, and
with the girdle round his waist, he leaped upon the pyre. On
his tomb was this inscription : Zarmanochegas, an Indian, a native
of Bargosa {Barygaza, Baroch), having immortalised himself
according to the custom of his country, here lies." Lassen takes
the name Zarmanochegas to represent the Sanskrit S'ramanacharya,
teacher of the S'ramanas^ from which it would appear he was a
Buddhist priest. Strabo writes at greater length than our his-
torians about the gymnosophists. In Book XV. i. 61 we have
390
APPENDICES
the following notices : " Aristoboulos says that he saw at Taxila
two sophists, both Brachmans, of whom the elder had his head
shaved, while the younger wore his hair ; disciples attended both.
They spent their time generally in the market-place. They are
honoured as public counsellors, and are free to take away without
charge any article exposed for sale which they may choose. He
who accosts them pours over them oil of jessamine in such
quantities that it runs down from their eyes. They make cakes
of honey and sesamum, of which large quantities are always for
sale, and their food thus costs them nothing. At Alexander's
table they ate standing, and, to give a sample of their endurance,
withdrew to a spot not far off, where the elder, lying down with
his back to the ground, endured the sun and the rains which had
set in as spring had just begun. The other stood on one leg,
holding up with both his hands a bar of wood 3 cubits long ;
one leg being tired he rested his weight on the other, and did
this throughout the day. The younger seemed to have far more
self-command ; for though he followed the king a short distance,
he soon returned to his home. The king sent after him, but the
king, he said, should come to him if he wanted anything from
him. The other accompanied the king to the end of his life.
During his stay he changed his dress and altered his mode of
life, saying, when reproached for so doing, that he had completed
the forty years of discipline which he had vowed to observe.
Alexander gave presents to his children. (6;^) Onesikritos says
that he himself was sent to converse with these sages. ... He
found at the distance of twenty stadia from the city fifteen men
standing in different attitudes, sitting or lying down naked, and
continuing in these positions till the evening, when they went back
to the city. What was hardest to bear was the heat of the sun,
which was so powerful that no one else could bear without pain
to walk barefooted on the ground at mid-day. (64) He conversed
with Kalanos, one of these sages, who accompanied the king to
Persia, and burned himself after the custom of his country on a
pile of wood. Onesikritos found him lying upon stones, and
drawing near to address him, informed him that he had been sent
by the king, who had heard the fame of his wisdom. As the
king would require an account of the interview, he was prepared
to listen to his discourse if he did not object to converse with
him. When Kalanos saw the cloak, head-dress, and shoes of his
visitor, he laughed and said : " Formerly there was abundance of
corn and barley in the world, as there is now of dust ; fountains
then flowed with water, milk, honey, wine, and oil, but repletion
and luxury made men turn proud and insolent. Zeus, indignant
APPENDICES
391
at this, destroyed all, and assigned to man a life of toil. When
temperance and other virtues in consequence again appeared,
then good things again abounded. But at present the condition
of mankind tends to satiety and wantonness, and there is cause to
fear lest the existing state of things should disappear." When he
had finished he proposed to Onesikritos, if he wished to hear his
discourse, to strip off his clothes, to lie down naked beside him
on the same stones, and in that manner to hear what he had to
say. While he was uncertain what to do, Mandanes, the oldest
and wisest of the sages, reproached Kalanos for his insolence —
the very vice which he had been condemning. Mandanes then
called Onesikritos to him, and said, I commend the king, because,
although he governs so vast an empire, he is yet desirous of
acquiring wisdom, for he is the only philosopher in arms that I
ever saw. ... (65) "The tendency of his discourse," he said,
'' was this, that the best philosophy was that which liberated the
mind from pleasure and grief; that grief differed from labour, in
that the former was pernicious, the latter friendly, to men ; for
that men exercised their bodies with labour to strengthen the
mental powers, whereby they would be able to end dissensions,
and give every one good advice, both to the public and to private
persons; that he should at present advise Taxiles to receive
Alexander as a friend ; for by entertaining a person better than
himself he might be improved, while by entertaining a worse he
might influence that person to be good. After this Mandanes
inquired whether such doctrines were taught among the Greeks.
Onesikritos answered that Pythagoras taught a like doctrine, and
instructed his disciples to abstain from whatever had life ; that
Sokrates and Diogenes, whose discourses he had heard, held the
same views. Mandanes replied, that in other respects he thought
them to be wise ; but that they were mistaken in preferring
custom to nature, else they would not be ashamed to go naked
as he did, and to live on frugal fare, for, said he, that is the best
house that requires least repairs. He states further that they
employ themselves much on natural subjects, as forecasting the
future, rain, drought, and diseases. On going into the city they
disperse themselves in the market-places. . . . Every wealthy
house, even to the women's apartments, is open to them. When
they enter they converse with the inmates and share their meal.
Disease of the body they regard as very disgraceful, and he who
fears that it will attack him, prepares a pyre and lets the flames
consume him. He anoints himself beforehand, and when he
has placed himself upon the pile orders it to be lighted, and
remains motionless while he is burning. (66) Nearchos gives
392
APPENDICES
the following account of the sages : The Brachmans engage in
public affairs, and attend the kings as counsellors ; the rest are
occupied in the study of nature. Kalanos belonged to the latter
class. Women study philosophy with them, and all lead an
ascetic life.
Athenaios in his Gytmiosophists (x. p. 437) quotes, like Plut-
arch, from Chares, the account of the drinking bout which
followed the burning of Kalanos. He says that Alexander pro-
posed the match on account of the bibulous propensities {phil-
oinia) of the Indians. Other references to Kalanos are to be
found in Ailianos, V. H, ii. 41 and v. 6 ; Lucian, De M. Fereg.
25 ; Cicero, Disp. Tusc. ii. 22, and De Divin. i. 23, 30. In the
romance History of Alexander, by the Pseudo-Kallisthenes, six
long chapters of Book iii. (11-17) are full of Kalanos, Mandanes,
and the Brachmans.
St. Ambrose wrote a work, De Bragmanibus, in which the
two gymnosophists are frequently mentioned.
Kallisthenes was a native of Olynthos. He was brought
up and educated by Aristotle, to whom he was related, and at
whose recommendation he was permitted to accompany Alex-
ander on his Asiatic expedition. He was deficient in tact and
prudence, and exasperated the king by the freedom with which
he censured him for adopting oriental customs, and especially
for requiring Macedonians to perform the ceremony of adoration.
When the plot of the pages to assassinate Alexander was dis-
covered, Kallisthenes was charged with being an accessary.
According to Chares he was imprisoned for seven months, and
died in India ; while Ptolemy states that he was tortured and
crucified. Besides other works, he wrote an account of Alex-
ander's expedition, to which Strabo and Plutarch make a few
references, but it was a work of little if any value.
Kanishka, a great Turanian conqueror, w^hose empire ex-
tended from Kabul to Agra and Gujrut. He was an ardent
Buddhist. The date of his coronation, 78 a.d., marks the begin-
ning of the S'akabda aera.
Kleander, one of Alexander's officers. He was employed
to kill Parmenion, to whom he was next in command at Ekbatana.
He was himself put to death when he joined Alexander in Kar-
mania, on account of his profligacy and oppression while in
Media.
Kleitos was a Macedonian, and brother to Alexander's nurse.
He saved Alexander's life at the Granikos. When the com-
panion cavalry was divided into two bodies, the command of
one was given to Kleitos and of the other to Hephaistion. In
APPENDICES
393
328 B.C. he was appointed to succeed Artabazos in the satrapy of
Baktria, but on the eve of his departure to take up this office
he was killed by Alexander in a drunken brawl.
KoiNOs was the son of Polemokrates, and the son-in-law of
Parmenion. He was one of Alexander's ablest generals, and
greatly distinguished himself on various occasions, and especially
in the battle with Poros. When Alexander had reached the
Hyphasis and wished to proceed farther and reach the Ganges,
Koinos had the courage to remonstrate, and the king was obliged
to act on his advice. He died soon after of an illness, and was
honoured with a splendid burial.
K6PHA10S. — A chief whose dominions lay to the west of the
Indus and along the river Kophen.
KoRAGOS. — A Macedonian bravo called also Horratas.
KosMAS Indikopleustes. — An Egyptian monk who flourished
towards the middle of the sixth century of our aera. In early
life he was a merchant, and visited for traffic various countries,
Aethiopia, Syria, Arabia, Persia, India, and many other places of
the East. After he had taken to monastic life he wrote a work
called Christiart Topography, which is valuable for the geogra-
phical and historical information it contains. It has some
notices concerning India, especially concerning its Christian
communities.
Krateros, a Macedonian of Orestis, was one of Alexander's
most distinguished generals, and next to Hephaistion his greatest
favourite. He was in command of infantry on the left wing at
Issos, and of cavalry on the same wing at Gaugamela. He rose
afterwards to be commander of one of the divisions of the
phalanx. On the day of the battle with Poros he was left with a
part of the army in the camp, and did not cross the river till
victory had declared for Alexander. He commanded the troops
which were sent back from India by way of the Bolan Pass to
Karmania. At Sousa he married Amastris, the niece of Darius,
after which he led, along with Polysperchon, the discharged
veterans back to Europe. In the division of the empire after
Alexander's death Greece and Macedonia and other European
provinces fell to the share of Antipater and Krateros, who
divorced Amastris and married Phila, Antipater's daughter. In
321 B.C. Krateros fell in battle against Eumenes, who honoured
his old comrade in the Indian wars with a magnificent funeral.
Kyrsilos, a native of Pharsalos, who accompanied Alexander
to Asia and wrote an account of his exploits. He is mentioned
by Strabo (XI. xiv. 12).
394
APPENDICES
Leonnatos, a native of Fella, was one of Alexander's most
capable and distinguished officers. At the time of Philip's death he
occupied one of the highest positions at court, being one of the
select bodyguard called soma top hy lakes, but under Alexander he
was at first only an officer of the companion cavalry. After the
battle of Issos he was sent to inform the wife of Darius of her
husband's safety, and when Arrhybas, one of the bodyguards,
died in Egypt, he was promoted to the vacant post. After this
his name continually occurs among the names of those who were
constantly about the king's person and stood highest in his con-
fidence. On several occasions he showed the greatest courage,
and at the siege of the Mallian stronghold he saved, along with
Peukestas, the king's life. When the army marched back from
India he was left to overawe the Oreitai, and to wait in their
country till Nearchos should reach it with the fleet. He inflicted
a crushing defeat on that people, who had assembled a large
army after Alexander had left their borders. For this and other
services he was rewarded at Sousa with a golden crown. In the
division of the empire he received only the satrapy of the Lesser
Phrygia, a share which by no means satisfied his ambition.
Kleopatra, Alexander's sister, then ofl"ered him her hand on con-
dition that he should assist her against Antipater, the regent of
Macedonia. He consented, but when he passed over into that
country he was slain in battle against the Greeks, who had re-
volted from Antipater, whose dominions he wished to appropriate
in their integrity.
Lysimachos was one of Alexander's great generals and one of
his select bodyguards. He was born at Pella — the son of a
Thessalian serf who by his flatteries had won the good graces of
King Philip. Great personal strength and undaunted courage
seem to have been the qualities by which Lysimachos gained his
splendid position, for he was seldom entrusted by Alexander with
any separate command of importance. He was present in the
battle with Poros, and was wounded at the siege of Sangala. In
the division of the empire he obtained Thrace for his share, but
his dominions after the battle of Issos, in which along with
Seleukos, Ptolemy, and Kassander, he defeated Antigonos and
his son Demetrios, embraced for a time all Alexander's European
possessions, in addition to Asia Minor. His third wife was
Arsinoe, the daughter of Ptolemy, King of Egypt. In 281 B.C.
he was defeated and slain by his old comrade in arms, Seleukos.
He was then eighty years of age.
Megasthenes, the ambassador sent by Seleukos Nikator to
APPENDICES
395
the court of Sandrokottos, and author of a work on India of the
highest value. Though this work is lost, numerous fragments
have been preserved by Strabo, Arrian, Pliny, and many other
writers.
Mela, PoxMponius, the first Roman author known to have
composed a formal work on geography. It is supposed that he
flourished under the Emperor Claudius.
Meleager was by birth a Macedonian, and served w^ith dis-
tinction in Alexander's Asiatic campaigns, where he commanded
one of the divisions of the phalanx. He was present in the great
battles of the Granikos, Issos, Gaugamela, and the Hydaspes.
He was never entrusted, however, with any special or important
command. He was a man of an insolent and factious disposi-
tion, and showed himself to be such in the discussions which
arose between the generals after Alexander's death concerning
the arrangements which should be made for the government of
the empire. He led for a time the opposition against Perdik-
kas, but was afterwards for a short time associated with him in
the regency. Two such colleagues could not long act in har-
mony. Perdikkas, who w^as an adept in the arts of dissimulation,
lulled Meleager into fancied security, devised a cunning scheme
for his overthrow, and having succeeded in this ordered him to
be put to death.
Memnon, the Rhodian, was the brother of Mentor, who stood
high in the favour of Darius, and brother-in-law of Artabazos, the
satrap of Lower Phrygia. On the death of his brother, Memnon,
who possessed great military skill and experience, succeeded to
his authority, which extended over the coast of Asia Minor. He
was the most formidable opponent Alexander encountered in
Western Asia. Fortunately for him, Memnon died in 333 B.C.,
when preparing to sail for Greece, where the Spartans were ready
to join him and rise against the Macedonians.
MoPHis. — See Taxiles.
MousiKANOs was the ruler of a rich and fertile kingdom which
lay along the banks of the Indus, in Upper Sindh. He submitted
to Alexander without resistance, and was allowed to retain his
sovereignty. The Brahmans, however, prevailed on him to revolt
during Alexander's absence. He w^as captured by Peithon and
crucified by Alexander's orders.
MuLLiNUS is called by Curtius the king's secretary. Eumenes
is probably meant. The name is not met with except in one
passage in Curtius.
Nearchos. — Among all the great men associated with Alex-
396
APPENDICES
ander no one has left a reputation more noble and unsullied than
that of Nearchos. The long and difficult voyage in unknown seas
which he successfully accomplished ranks as one of the greatest
achievements in the annals of navigation. He was free from the
mad ambition to rule which gave rise to the deadly feuds between
Alexander's other great generals, and stained the records of their
lives with so many dark crimes. He was a native of Crete, but
settled at Amphipolis, a Macedonian city near the Thracian
border. He held a high position at the court of King Philip,
where he attached himself to the party of the young prince, and
was banished along with Ptolemy, Harpalos, and others, who had
involved themselves in his intrigues. Alexander, on mounting the
throne, recalled his former partisans, and did not neglect their
interests. Nearchos accompanied him into Asia, where he was
appointed governor of Lykia and other provinces south of the
Tauros. This post he continued to hold for five years. He
rejoined Alexander before he left Baktria to invade India, and in
India he was appointed commander of the fleet which was built
on the Hydaspes. He conducted it down that river and the
Akesines and the Indus to Patala (now Haidarabad), a naval
station at the apex of the Indus Delta. He arrived at that place
about the time when the south-west monsoon usually sets in.
Alexander, on returning to Patala from the excursions he made
to the ocean, removed the fleet to Killouta, an island in the
western branch of the Indus, which possessed a commodious
haven. He then set out on his return to Persia, leaving the fleet
with Nearchos, who had relieved Alexander's mind of a load of
anxiety by voluntarily proffering his services to conduct the ex-
pedition by sea to the head of the Persian Gulf. When we
consider, as Bunbury remarks, the total ignorance of the Greeks
at this time concerning the Indian seas, and the imperfect char-
acter of their navigation, it is impossible not to admire the noble
confidence with which Nearchos ventured to promise that he
would bring the ships in safety to the shores of Persia, "if the sea
were navigable and the thing feasible for mortal man." Nearchos
wished to defer his departure till the monsoon had quite sub-
sided, but as he was in danger of being attacked by the natives,
who were no longer overawed by Alexander's presence, he set sail
on the 2ist of September, 325 b.c. He was forced, however, by
the violence of the weather, when he had reached the mouth of
the Indus, to take refuge in a sheltered bay at a station which he
called Alexander's Haven, and which is now known as Karachi,
the great emporium of the trade of the Indus. After a deten-
tion here for twenty-four days, he resumed his voyage on the 23rd
APPENDICES
397
of October. Coasting the shore of the Arabics for 80 miles,
he reached the mouth of the river Arabis (now the Purali), which
divides the Arables from the Oreitai. The coast of the latter
people, which was 100 miles in extent, was navigated in eighteen
days. At one of the landing-places the ships were supplied by
Leonnatos with stores of corn, which lasted ten days. The naviga-
tion of the Mekran coast which succeeded occupied twenty days,
and the distance traversed was 480 miles English, though Near-
chos in his journal has set it down at 10,000 stadia or 1250
miles. The expedition in this part of the voyage suffered great
distress for want of provisions. The coast was barren, and its
savage inhabitants, the Ichthyophagi,^ had little else to subsist
on than fish, which some of them ate raw.'^ The Karmanian
coast, which succeeded, was not so distressingly barren, but was
even, in certain favoured localities, extremely fertile and beauti-
ful. Its length was 296 miles, and the time taken in its naviga-
tion was nineteen days, some of which, however, were spent at
the mouth of the river Anamis (now the Minab), whence Near-
chos made a journey into the interior to apprise Alexander of
the safety of his fleet. The coasts of Persis and Sousis were
navigated in thirty-one days. Nearchos had intended to sail up
the Tigris, but having passed its mouth unawares, continued sail-
ing westward till he reached Diridotis (Teredon), an emporium
in Babylonia on the Pallocopas branch of the Euphrates. He
thence retraced his course to the Tigris, and ascended its stream
till he reached a lake through which at that time it flowed and
which received the river Pasitigris, the Ulai of Scripture, and now
the Karun. The fleet proceeded up this river till it met the army
near a bridge on the highway from Persis to Sousa. It anchored at
the bridge on the 24th of February, 324 B.C., so that the whole
voyage was performed in 146 days. Nearchos received appro-
priate rewards for the splendid service he had so successfully
performed. Alexander was sending him away on another great
maritime expedition when the illness which carried off the great
^ According to Dr. Bellew this
name is the Greek equivalent of the
Persian Mdhtkhoj'An, "fish - eaters,"
still surviving in the modern Makrcht.
[Since the above note was written the
cause of Eastern learning and research
has suffered a grievous loss by the
death of this distinguished Orientalist,
whose work on the Ethnology of
Afghanistan will prove a lasting monu-
ment to his fame. The work discusses
ittter alia the ethnic affinities of the
various races with which Alexander
came into contact during his Asiatic
expedition.]
- Major E. Mockler, the political
agent of ^lakran, contributed some
years ago to ihe Journal of the Royal
Asiatic Society a valuable paper on
the identification of places on this
coast mentioned by Arrian, Ptolemy,
and Marcian, in which he corrected
some errors into which the commen-
tators on these authors had fallen.
398
APPENDICES
conqueror broke up the enterprise. In the discussions which
followed regarding the succession to the throne, Nearchos un-
successfully advocated the claims of Herakles, the son of Alex-
ander by Barsine, who was the daughter of Artabazos and the
widow of Memnon the Rhodian. He acquiesced, however, in
the arrangements made by the other generals, and was content
with receiving his former government, even though he was to
hold it subject to the authority of Antigonos. He accompanied
his superior when he marched against Eumenes, and interceded
for the life of the latter when he fell into the hands of his
enemies. Nothing is known of his history after the year 314
B.C, when he was selected by Antigonos to assist his son Deme-
trios with his counsels when left for the first time in command
of an army.
NiKANOR, the son of Parmenion, was commander of the hypas-
pists or footguards in the Asiatic expedition. He was present
in the three great battles against the troops of Darius, and died
of disease before the charge of conspiracy was preferred against
his brother Philotas.
Olympias, the mother of Alexander, was a passionate, ambi-
tious, and intriguing woman. She was put to death by order of
Kassander, the son of the regent Antipater, in 316 B.C., thus
surviving her son seven years.
Omphis. — See Taxiles.
Onesikritos was a Greek historical writer who accompanied
Alexander on his Asiatic expedition. He professed the philosophy
of Diogenes the Cynic, and on this account was sent by Alexander
to converse with the gymnosophists of Taxila. He was the pilot
of Alexander's ship and of the fleet in sailing down the Indus,
and afterwards during the voyage to the head of the Persian Gulf
The history written by Onesikritos, which embraced the whole
life of Alexander, fell into discredit owing to the manner in which
he intermingled fact with fiction. His work was, however, too
much undervalued. He was the first author who mentions the
island of Taprobane (Ceylon). In his later years he attached
himself to the fortunes of Lysimachos of Thrace.
Orosius was a Spanish ecclesiastic of the fifth century, who
wrote a history of the world from the creation down to the year
A.D. 417.
OxYARTES, a Baktrian, the father of Alexander's queen
Roxana, was one of the chiefs who accompanied Bessos on his
retreat across the Oxus into Sogdiana. Alexander, after marry-
ing his daughter, appointed him satrap of the land of the Paro-
APPENDICES
399
pamisidai, and his successors allowed him to retain that govern-
ment. It is not known how long he lived, but it is supposed
that he was dead when Seleukos undertook his Indian expedition,
as his dominions were among those which were surrendered to
Sandrokottos.
OxYKANOS, called Portikanos by Strabo and Diodoros, ruled
a territory which adjoined that of Mousikanos, but its exact posi-
tion or boundaries cannot be ascertained.
Panini, the celebrated Indian grammarian, was a native of
Salatura, in Gandhara. His date is generally referred to the
fourth century B.C., but this is still a matter of controversy.
Parmenion was the most experienced and most trusted general
who accompanied Alexander into Asia. He commanded the
left wing of the Macedonian army in the three great battles
against Darius. He was left in command in Media, and so did
not accompany the expedition into India. His assassination has
left an indelible stain on Alexander's character.
Patrokles was a general who held under Seleukos and
Antiochos an important government over some eastern provinces
of the Syrian empire. He collected much valuable information
regarding the little -known parts which adjoined his province.
His work, embodying this information, is frequently quoted by
Strabo.
Pausanias was the author of an Ititierary of Greece^ full of
valuable topographical and antiquarian information. He wrote
in the age of the Antonines.
Peithon. — Three officers of this name accompanied Alex-
ander into Asia — first, Peithon, the son of Sosikles, who was
wounded and taken prisoner by the Skythians under Spitamenes,
and is not subsequently mentioned ; second, Peithon, the son of
Krateuas, who, like Ptolemy, was a native of Eordaia, and a
member of the select bodyguard ; third, Peithon, the son of
Agenor, who, like the preceding, rendered distinguished services
in the Indian campaigns. The historians have recorded nothing
of their previous achievements, and when they come to mention
those performed in India, do not always make it clear to which
of the two they mean to ascribe them.
Peithon, the son of Krateuas, after Alexander's death pro-
posed that Perdikkas and Leonnatos should be appointed joint
regents of the empire, and for this service was rewarded with the
satrapy of Media. After the assassination of Perdikkas he was
himself, through the influence of Ptolemy, raised to the regency
in conjunction with Arrhidaios, but was soon compelled to resign
400
APPENDICES
and retire to his Median government. He assisted Antigonos to
overthrow Eumenes ; but Antigonos, having subsequently sus-
pected him of entertaining treasonable designs, brought him to
trial before a council, and ordered him to be put to death in
316 B.C.
Peith6n, the son of Agenor, took an active part in the wars
against the Malloi and Mousikanos while holding the command
of one of the divisions of the footguards. He was appointed
satrap of Sindh from the great confluence downward to the sea-
coast, and was left behind in his province when Alexander took
his departure from India. After the death of Alexander he was
confirmed in his government, but, it would appear, was ousted
from it by Poros. After the fall of Eumenes he received from
Antigonos, whose side be had favoured, the satrapy of Babylon.
While serving with Demetrios, the son of Antigonos, he was slain
in the battle of Gaza, in which the young prince rashly and against
his advice engaged Ptolemy. This battle was fought in 312 B.C.
Perdikkas — one of Alexander's greatest generals — was a
native of the Macedonian province of Orestis, and descended,
according to Curtius, from a royal house. Under Philip he held
one of the highest offices at court, being a somatophylax, and
under Alexander he held the same position along with the com-
mand of a division of the phalanx, but afterwards of a division of
the companion cavalry. He distinguished himself at the siege
of Thebes, where he was severely wounded, and in the three
great battles against the armies of Darius. In the Persian,
Sogdian, and Indian campaigns he was frequently entrusted with
separate commands of great importance, and at Sousa was re-
warded for his services with a crown of gold and with the hand
of the daughter of the Median satrap. He was present with
Alexander during his fatal illness ; and it is said that the king
when expiring took off the royal signet-ring from his finger and
gave it to him, as if to indicate him as his successor. In the
deliberations which followed to settle the succession, Perdikkas
took a prominent part, and, with the consent of most of the other
generals, was appointed to act as regent of the empire on behalf
of Roxana's yet unborn child, which, it was hoped, might prove
to be a son. His selfish ambition, however, and acts of cruelty
soon created violent discontent, and a combination was formed
against; him by Antigonos, whom he attempted to bring to trial
for misgovernment, but who effected his escape to Macedonia,
and persuaded Antipater, Krateros, and Ptolemy to take up arms
on his behalf. He was slain by his own troops in Egypt, whither
he had proceeded in the hope of being able to crush Ptolemy
APPENDICES
401
before taking measures against the other confederates. Perdikkas was
crafty, cruel, and arrogant, without magnanimity, and, indeed, with-
out any virtue except personal courage and capacity as a general.
Peukestas, a native of Mieza in Macedonia, was one of
Alexander's great officers, and had the honour of carrying before
him in battle the sacred shield taken down from the temple of
Athena at Ilion. He is first mentioned as one of the officers
appointed to command a trireme on the Hydaspes. He had a
chief share in saving Alexander's life in the citadel of the Mallian
capital, and for this service was rewarded by being appointed
a somatophylax and afterwards satrap of Persia. After being
presented at Sousa with a golden crown, he proceeded to take
possession of his government, when he adopted the Persian dress
and Persian customs, thus pleasing his subjects as well as Alex-
ander himself He was in attendance on the king during his
last illness, but does not appear to have taken any leading part
in the discussions held after his death regarding the succession.
He was, however, permitted to retain his government. He took
an active part in the war conducted by Eumenes against Anti-
gonos. He was vain and fond of display, and his treachery
towards Eumenes, whom he helped to betray into the hands of
his enemies, has left a dark stain on his character.
Phegelas, or, as he is called by Diodoros, Phegeus, was
chief of a territory which lay between the Hydraotes and the
Hyphasis. With regard to the name, M. Sylvain Levi gives pre-
ference to the form Phegelas^ and states his reason thus : " The
e answers to the a of Sanskrit, the g to the ^ or to they. Phegeus
does not border on a known form ; Phegelas, on the contrary,
answers directly to the Sanskrit Bhagaia — the name of a royal
race of Kshatriyas which the Gana-patha classes under the rubric
Bahu, etc., with the name even of Taxiles, Ambhi." {Jourtial
Asiatique for 1890, p. 239.)
Philippos, the son of Machatas, was one of Alexander's
officers. In 327 B.C. he was appointed satrap of India. After
Alexander left India he was assassinated in a conspiracy formed
against him by the mercenaries under his command.
Phrataphernes was, under Darius, governor of Parthia and
Hyrkania. He accompanied that sovereign in his flight from
Arbela, but after his death submitted to Alexander, who reinstated
him in his satrapy. He joined Alexander in India after Poros
had been defeated, but seems to have soon afterwards returned
to his satrapy, whence he sent supplies to the Macedonian army
when pursuing its distressing march through Gedrosia. The
successors of Alexander allowed him to retain his satrapy.
2 D
402
APPENDICES
PoLYAiNOS, a Macedonian, who flourished about the middle
of the second century of our aera, and was the author of a work on
the stratagems of war, which is still extant.
PoLYKLEiTOS was a native of Larissa, who wrote a history of
Alexander. Most of the extracts preserved from this work refer
to the geography of the countries which Alexander conquered.
PoLYSPERCHON, or PoLYPERCHON, was One of the oldest offi-
cers of a high rank in Alexander's service. After the battle of
Issos he was promoted to the command of a division of the
phalanx in succession to Ptolemy, the son of Seleukos, who fell
in that battle. In Baktria he offended Alexander by casting
ridicule on the ceremony of prostration, and was thus for a time
in disgrace. He was present at the passage of the Hydaspes,
and also in the descent of the Indus, and was then sent with
Krateros to conduct the veterans from India to Karmania by
way of the Bolan Pass. He was not in Babylon at the time of
Alexander's death, and hence was passed over in the allotment
of the provinces made after that event. When war, however,
broke out between Antipater and Perdikkas, the former committed
to his hands the chief command in Macedonia and Greece during
his absence in Asia. The veteran general showed himself worthy
of the trust reposed in him, and received the reward of his
services at Antipater's death, who appointed him, in preference
to his own son, Kassander, to be his successor in the regency.
After many vicissitudes of fortune, and disgracing his name by
his treachery towards Phokion, and his causing Herakles, the son
of Alexander, whose cause he had espoused, to be murdered, he
disappears from history after the year 303 B.C.
P6ros was the most powerful king in the Panjab at the time
of Alexander's invasion. Hfi-Jwa^-theR at etv m it y with -Omphis,
the king of . Taxila.,, but in alliance with Abisares, the king of
KaTmir. After his defeat and submission to the conqueror, he
was confirmed in his kingdom, the limits of which were after-
wards considerably extended. All that is known of his history
will be found in the translations, if read along with the notice
below, of Sandrokottos, except that after Alexander's death he
made himself master of Sindh, from which he ousted Peithon.
The name of Poros, which is formed from Paura or Paurava,
with the Greek termination os added, shows that he belonged to
a family of the Lunar race. Bohlen, however, takes the name to
be a corruption of the Sanskrit Paurusha, which means " heroic."
Portikanos. — See Oxykanos.
Ptolemy, called the son of Lagos, is supposed to have been
in reality the son of Philip, as his mother Arsinoe was the con-
APPENDICES
403
cubine of that king, and was pregnant when married to Lagos.
Of all Alexander's generals Ptolemy was the one who approached
him nearest in a capacity both for war and government, while he
did not fall short of him in magnanimity of disposition. He was
banished from Macedonia by Philip, who discovered that he w^as
promoting with others a marriage bet\veen Alexander and the
daughter of Pixodaros, the king of Karia. He rendered im-
portant services in the war against Darius ; and when Demetrios,
a member of the select bodyguard, was arrested on suspicion of
being concerned in the conspiracy of Philotas, Ptolemy was pro-
moted to fill his place. It was he who obtained information of
the plot of Hermolaos, and by revealing it was probably the
means of saving the king's life. In the battle with the Aspasians,
Ptolemy slew their leader with his own hand, and in the campaigns
in India he was on several occasions entrusted with separate
commands of great importance. The story of Alexander's dream,
which led to the discovery of a plant by which Ptolemy was
cured of a dangerous wound inflicted by a poisoned arrow, must
be apocryphal, since Arrian, who had Ptolemy's own memoirs of
the expedition constantly before him, is silent on the subject. At
Sousa he received in marriage a daughter of Artabazos. After
Alexander's death he obtained Egypt as his share of the empire,
and raised that country to a high pitch of prosperity. He reigned
for no less than forty years. The dynasty which he founded,
after subsisting for nearly two hundred years, ended with the
death of Kleopatra.
Ptolemy III. ascended the throne of Egypt in 247 b.c. in
succession to his father Ptolemy Philadelphos. In the early part
of his reign he overran Syria, and having thence turned his arms.
Fig. 25. — Ptolemy IIL
eastward, advanced as far as Babylon and Sousa, and received
the submission of all the upper provinces of Asia as far as the
borders of Baktria and India. On returning to his kingdom he
carried back with him the statues of the Egyptian deities which
Kambyses had removed to the East, and restored them to their
404
APPENDICES
proper temples, an act which won for him the gratitude of the
Egyptians and the title by which he is generally known, Euergetes,
i.e. Benefactor. Like his father he distinguished himself by his
munificent patronage of literature and science. He was one of
the kings to whom Buddhist missionaries were sent by the
Indian king As'oka. He died in the year 222 B.C.
Ptolemy Physkon, king of Egypt, succeeded his brother
Ptolemy VI., surnamed Philometer.
RoxANA, the daughter of the Baktrian chief Oxyartes, was
considered by the Macedonians the most beautiful woman in
Asia, next to the wife of Darius. Alexander, who found her
charms irresistible, made her his wife, and she bore him a post-
humous son, called Alexander Aigos, who was admitted to a share
of the sovereignty under the regency of Perdikkas. Before his
birth she had enticed Alexander's other widow, Barsine or Stateira,
to Babylon, and caused her to be murdered. She subsequently
fell, with her son, into the power of Kassander, who placed them
both in AmphipoHs, where in 311 b.c. they were both murdered
by their keeper, Glaukias.
Sambus was the satrap of a mountainous country adjoining
the kingdom of Mousikanos, with whom he was at feud. His
capital, called Sindimana, has been identified with Sehwan, a city
on the Indus, for which see Note S. Sambus fled on Alexander's
approach, not to evade submission, but because he learned that
his enemy, Mousikanos, had been received into the conquerors
favour.
Sandrokottos (Chandragupta). — Sandrokottos, with the ex-
ception perhaps of his grandson, As'oka, was the greatest ruler
ancient India produced. Though of humble origin, he overthrew
the Macedonian power in the Panjab, conquered the kingdom of
Magadha, and founded a wide empire such as no Indian king had
before possessed. He is also memorable on another account.
Those learned men who about a century ago took up the study of
Sanskrit, established his identity with the Chandragupta who is
mentioned in the Buddhist Chronicle of Ceylon as the founder of
the Mauryan dynasty of Magadha, and by fixing the date of his
accession to the throne of that kingdom, supplied the chronology
of ancient India with its first properly-ascertained aera, and thus
brought it into line with the chronology of general history.
Besides the notices of this great sovereign in the writings we
have translated, the following occur elsewhere in the classics : —
Appian {Syriake, c. 55), speaking of Seleukos, says: "And
APPENDICES
405
having crossed the Indus, he warred with Androkottos, the king
of the Indians, who dwelt about that river, until he entered into
an alliance and a marriage affinity with him." Strabo (II. i. 9)
says : " Both of these men were sent to Palimbothra, Megasthenes
to Sandrokottos, and Deimachos to Allitrochades, his son," and
in XV. i. 36 repeats the statement as concerns Megasthenes. In
XV. i. 53 we read: "Megasthenes, who was in the camp of
Sandrokottos, which consisted of 400,000 men, did not witness
on any day thefts reported which exceeded the sum of 200
drachmai, and this among a people who have no written laws,
who are ignorant even of writing, and regulate everything by
memory." Lasdy, in XV. i. 57 we read : "Similar to this is the
account of the Enotokoitai, of the wild men, and of other
monsters. The wild men could not be brought to Sandrokottos,
for they died by abstaining from food." Arrian in his Indika
(c 5) says : "But even Megasthenes, as far as appears, did not
travel over much of India, though no doubt he saw more of it
than those who came with Alexander, the son of Philip, for, as
he says, he had interviews with Sandrokottos, the greatest king of
the Indians, and with Poros, who was still greater than he."^
Lastly, Athenaios mentions him in his Deip7iosophists (c. 18 d):
" Phylarchos says that among the presents which Sandrokoptos,
the king of the Indians, sent to Seleukos were certain powerful
aphrodisiacs." It will be observed that Athenaios transcribes the
name of the Indian king more correctly than any of the other
authors.
These detached notices, combined with those which appear
in the translations, we may now gather together into a con-
nected and consistent narrative. Sandrokottos was of obscure
birth, and, from the remark of Plutarch that in his early years he
had seen Alexander, we may infer that he was a native of the
Panjab. It was at one time thought that he had in some way
offended the conqueror, and that to escape the effects of his dis-
pleasure, he had fled for protection to the court of Magadha.
But this belief must now be given up, as it was based on a
corrupt passage in Justin, which, by the restoration of the correct
reading, shows that it was not Alexander whom he had offended,
but Nandrus or Xandrames, the Magadha king. We do not
know what induced Sandrokottos to leave his home and take
service under the latter monarch, but we incline to attribute it to
a sentiment of patriotism forbidding him to seek office or advance-
^ A slight emendation of the read-
ing (suggested by Schwanbeck) restores
the passage to sense, making Arrian
say that Sandrokottos was greater
even than Poros.
4o6
APPENDICES
ment under a power which had crushed the Hberties of his
country. What the nature of his offence against Nandrus was
does not appear, but he so dreaded his resentment that he quitted
his dominions and returned home to the Panjab. He found it,
although Alexander had now been six years dead, still under
Greek vassalage, and ruled as formerly in civil matters by Omphis
of Taxila and the great Poros, while the military administration
had passed into the hands of PLudemos. Soon after his arrival,
however, the order of things was violently disturbed. Eudemos
having decoyed Poros into his power, treacherously murdered
him/ but had no sooner done so than he was recalled to the
west to succour Eumenes in his war against Antigonos. As he
took with him 3000 foot, 500 horse, and 125 elephants, he de-
nuded the province of the main strength of the force by which it
was held in subjection, and his departure was fatal to Greek
power. The Indians, who longed for freedom, and were no
doubt greatly incensed by the murder of Poros, rose in revolt.
Sandrokottos, who headed this movement, having collected a
band of insurgents, overthrew the existing government, expelled
the remainder of the Greek garrison, and finally installed himself
in the sovereignty of the Panjab and of all the lower valley of the
Indus. The insurgents, whom he led to victory, are called by
Justin robbers ; but we must not thence infer that he was a bandit
leader, who, by taking advantage of an opportune crisis, rose to
power by the help of desperadoes whose crimes had banished
them from society. His adherents were, in point of fact, chiefly
the Arattd of the Panjab, who were always called robbers, and are
denounced as such in the Mahabharata. The Kathaians, who
so stoutly resisted Alexander at Sangala, were included under this
designation, w^hich means Kingless^ and implies that they lived
under republican institutions. The stories told by the same
author of the lion which licked the sweat from Sandrokottos when
asleep, and of the elephant which volunteered to carry him into
batde, and thus gave presages of his future greatness, reflect the
true spirit of oriental romance, and were no doubt derived from
native traditions which somehow found their way to the west.
They remind one of Joseph's dreams, in which he saw the sheaves
and then the heavenly bodies falling down in obeisance before
him.
Sandrokottos while in Magadha had seen that the king was
held in such odium and contempt by his subjects that, as Plutarch
^ It seems that Poros, after Alex-
ander's death, had possessed himself
of the satrapy of the Lower Indus,
held till then by Peithon son of
Agenor.
APPENDICES
407
tells us, he used often afterwards to speak of the ease with which
Alexander might have possessed himself of the whole country. He
accordingly had no sooner settled the affairs of the Panjab than
he prepared to invade the dominions of his former master. The
success which he anticipated followed his arms. He overthrew
with ease the unpopular despot, and having received the submis-
sion of Magadha, extended his conquests far beyond its eastern
limits. He was thus able to combine into one great empire the
regions both of the Indus and the Ganges. He established the
seat of government at Palibothra, the capital of Magadha, a great
city advantageously situated at the confluence of the Erannoboas or
Son with the Ganges, and on the site now occupied by Patna,
beneath which, at a depth of from 1 2 to 1 5 feet, its ruins lie
entombed
While Sandrokottos was thus, with a genius like that of Akbar,
welding the states of India into unity, the successors of Alexander
were too much engrossed with their internecine wars to concern
themselves with his doings ; but when they had for a time com-
posed their difl'erences, Seleukos Nikator, the king of Syria,
advanced eastward to recover the Indian conquests of Alexander.
The date of this expedition cannot be fixed with precision, but it
was probably made in the year 305 B.C., or about ten years after
Sandrokottos had ascended the throne of Palibothra. The
records of it are unfortunately lost. It seems that he w^as allowed
to cross the Indus without opposition, but it is not known how
far he advanced into the country. We do not even know whether
the hostile armies came into actual conflict, but we may con-
jecture that the sight of the vast and formidable host brought
into the field by his antagonist, who was an experienced com-
mander of the stamp of Poros, led him to think discretion would
be the better part of valour, and to prefer entering into negotia-
tions rather than to risk the chance of defeat. At all events
he concluded a treaty by which he not only resigned his claims
to the Greek conquests beyond the Indus, but ceded to the
Indian king considerable districts extending w^estward from that
river to the southern slopes of the Hindu -Kush. The com-
pact was cemented by a matrimonial alliance, the Syrian king
triving his daughter in marriage to Sandrokottos. Friendly
relations seem to have subsisted ever afterwards between the two
sovereigns.
Seleukos sent as his ambassador to the Indian court his friend
and companion Megasthenes. This was a fortunate choice,
for while there Megasthenes, who was an acute observer and of
an inquisitive turn of mind, composed a work on India, in which
4o8
APPENDICES
he gave a faithful account of what fell under his own observation,
as well as of what facts he could gather from trustworthy reports.
That work, now lost, was the source whence Strabo and other
classical authors derived most of their information regarding
India. In such of the fragments thus preserved as relate to
Sandrokottos, we find an admirable picture of his system of
government, of his personal habits, and of the regulations of his
court. He did not live to old age, but died in 291 b.c., before
he had reached his fifty-fifth year.
When we turn to the Buddhist accounts of Chandragupta we
find them tally so closely in all main points with the Greek
accounts of Sandrokottos that no doubt can be left that the two
names which are so nearly similar denote but one and the same
person. As he was the founder of the dynasty to which the
pious As'oka, the Constantine of the Buddhist faith, belonged,
the Buddhist writers assign to him an honourable pedigree which
connected him even with the royal house whence Buddha him-
self sprang. His father, they tell us, reigned over a small king-
dom situated in a valley among the Himalayas, and called
Maurya, from the great number of its peacocks {Mayura). He
was killed in resisting an invasion of his enemies, but his queen
escaped to Pataliputra, where she gave birth to a son whom she
exposed in the neighbourhood of a cattle shed. The child, like
Oedipus, was found by a shepherd, who called him Chandragupta
{Moon protected), and charged himself with his maintenance.
There resided at that time in Pataliputra a Brahman who had
come from the great city of Taxila in the Panjab, and whose name
was Chanakya. To him King Dhanananda had givea an insult
which could be expiated by nothing short of his destruction.
While the Brahman was casting about for means whereby he
could clear his score with the offender, Chandragupta, now a boy,
fell under his cognisance. Having discovered that he was of
royal descent, and foreseen from his conduct among his com-
panions that in after life he would be capable of great achieve-
ments, he bought him from the shepherd and gave him a training
adapted to make him a fit instrument for the execution of his
designs. When Chandragupta had grown up, his master put
under his command a body of troops kept secretly in his pay, and
attempted a rebellion, which proved abortive. Chandragupta fled
to the desert, but having ere long collected a fresh force he
invaded Magadha from the border, that is, from the side of the
Panjab. He captured city after city till the capital itself fell into
his hands. The king was slain, and Chandragupta ascended the
vacant throne.
APPENDICES
409
Another form of the native tradition assigns his paternity to
Dhanananda (the last of the eight Nanda kings, who ruled in
succession over Magadha), though not by his queen, but by a
woman of low caste — a sudra called Mura. The Brahmans
made this base-born scion of the royal house the instrument of
their rebellious designs, and with the help of a northern prince,
to whom they offered an accession of territory, raised him to the
throne while he was yet a youth, and put Nanda and his eight
sons to death. They did not make good their promise to their
ally, but rid themselves of him by assassination. His son Malaya-
ketu marched with a large army, in which were Yavanas (Greeks),
to revenge his death, but returned without success to his country.
It has been supposed that this expedition may have been the
same as that of Seleukos.
The Nanda dynasty which was supplanted by the Mauryan
in 315 B.C. had succeeded to that of Sisunaga in 370 B.C. Its
last member, whom the Greeks call Xa7idraities and Curtius
Agrammes, is variously named in native writings Dha?iananda,
Nanda Mahdpadma, and Hiranyagupta. Xandramas (of which
Agrammes seems to be a distorted form) transliterates the Sans-
krit Chandramas, which means Moon-god. A Hindu play — the
Mudra Rakshasa — produced early in the Mahommedan period
refers to the revolution by which Chanakya raised Chandragupta
to power, but is of no historical value. Chandragupta was suc-
ceeded by his son Vindusara, who is called by Strabo Allitrochades,
and by Athenaios (xiv. 67),^ Amiti'ochates, a form which trans-
literates the Sanskrit Amitraghdta, a title by which he was
frequently designated, and which means enemy-slayer. He was
succeeded by his son As'oka in 270 b.c.
Seleukos Nikator, one of Alexander's great generals who
made himself king of Syria, was the son of Antiochos, an
officer of high rank in the service of King Philip. Seleukos was
distinguished for his great personal strength and courage, and
when he accompanied Alexander into Asia held a command in
the companion cavalry. He crossed the Hydaspes with Alex-
ander himself, and took an important part in the great battle
which followed. At Sousa he was rewarded for his eminent services
with the hand of Apama, an Asiatic princess, the daughter of
Spitamenes. In the dissensions which broke out after Alexander's
death among his generals, Seleukos sided with Perdikkas and
^ The passage states that Amitro-
chates, the king of the Indians, wrote
to Antiochos asking that king to buy
and send him sweet wine, dried figs,
and a sophist ; and that Antiochos
replied : We shall send you the figs
and the wine, but in Greece the laws
forbid a sophist to be sold. Athenaios
quotes Hegesander as his authority.
4IO
APPENDICES
the cavalry against Meleager and the infantry, and was in con-
sequence made Cliiliarch of the companions, one of the highest
offices, and one which Perdikkas himself had previously held.
He accompanied Perdikkas into Egypt, but he there put himself
at the head of the mutineers by whom his patron was assassinated.
At the second partition of the provinces made at Triparadeisos
321 B.C. he obtained the Babylonian satrapy, and established
himself in Babylon. He assisted Antigonos in the war against
Eumenes, but afterwards contended against him in alliance with
Ptolemy. During an interval when hostilities were suspended
between himself and his rivals, Seleukos undertook an expedition
into India to regain the conquests of Alexander over which San-
drokottos had established his authority. We do not know how
far he advanced into India, but he probably again crossed the
Hydaspes, which he had crossed twenty years before along with
the great conqueror himself. The result of the expedition was a
treaty by which Seleukos ceded to Sandrokottos his Indian pro-
vinces and the regions west of the Indus as far as the range of
Paropanisos, in exchange for 500 elephants, and a marriage
alliance by which the daughter of Seleukos became the bride of
the Indian king. Immediately either before or after this expedi-
tion, Seleukos in 306 B.C., following the examples of Antigonos
and Ptolemy, formally assumed the regal title and diadem. In
the battle of Ipsos 301 B.C., where Seleukos, in league with
Ptolemy, Lysimachos, and Kassander, fought against Antigonos,
the cavalry and elephants which the Syrian king brought into the
field were mainly instrumental in securing the victory. The
empire of Seleukos then became the most extensive of those
which had been formed out of Alexander's conquests, extending
from Phoenicia to Baktria and Sogdiana. After being engaged in
other wars, Seleukos crossed the Hellespont with an army with a
view to seize the crown of Macedonia, but was assassinated at
Lysimachia by Ptolemy Keraunos in the beginning of the year
280 B.C. in the thirty-second year of his reign.
SisiKOTTOS was an Indian who had deserted his countrymen
and taken service under Bessos. After the conquest of Baktria
he took service under Alexander, who, no doubt, obtained from
him much valuable information regarding India and its affairs.
After the capture of the rock Aornos, Sisikottos was left in com-
mand of the garrison which Alexander established there. He
afterwards sent messengers to inform Alexander that the Assa-
^kenians had revolted from him.
SiTALKES was a leader of Thracian light-armed troops in
Alexander's service. He was left under Parmenion in Media,
APPENDICES
411
and on Alexander's return from India was put to death for
misgovernment.
SoLiNus was the author of a compendium of geography
extracted mostly from the Natural History of Pliny. He lived
about the middle of the third century a.d.
SoPHEiTES or SoPEiTHES was, according to Curtius and
Diodoros, king of a territory situated to the west of the Hyphasis.
According to Arrian his dominions (or those of a king of the
same name) lay along the banks of the Hydaspes, and, as we
learn from Strabo, embraced the salt range of mountains called
OroDmius by Pliny. With regard to the name, Lassen took it
to represent the Sanskrit As'vapati, " lord of horses." M. Sylvain
Levi, however, thinks this a fanciful identification of the two
names, erring against Greek and against Sanskrit. He then says :
" A drachma of Indian silver coined towards the end of the fourth
century B.C. in imitation of Greek money bears the inscription
212<|»YTOY. The form Sophytes is, then, the only one to be
considered. The laws of transcription established by numerous
examples give the equivalents : w = ^ or aw^ ^ = bh. Sophytes
then leads back to Sobutha or Saubh. The Gana-patha knows
precisely a country of the name of Saubhuta. Panini (IV. ii. 67
^^^.) shows by examples how local names are formed. . . . The
name of Samkala, etc., is formed in this way. M. Bhandarkar
has already recognised in the city of Samkala the famous fortress
of Sangala, ... but the Indian savant has not overcome the
old prejudice which, regardless of the laws of transcription,
identifies Sangala with S akala, capital of the Madras (Lassen,
Iftd. Alt, I 2>oi). . . . The identification firmly fixed of Sophytes
and Saubhuta dissipates henceforward all doubts. Among the
names classed in the Gana-patha under the rubric Samkala, etc.,
is found Subhfita, which gives, in virtue of the rule stated, Sau-
bhuta as the name of a locality. Everything concurs in proving
the correctness of our identification."
SPHiNis. — See Kalanos.
Spitakes is supposed to be the same as the Pittakos men-
tioned by Polyainos. He was slain fighting on the side of Poros
in the battle of the Hydaspes. His territories lay near that river.
Spitamenes, the most formidable and persistent of all the
chiefs who opposed Alexander in the regions of the Oxus and
Jaxartes.
Stasan6r, a distinguished officer in Alexander's army, was
a native of Soloi in Cyprus. For services rendered during the
Baktrian campaign he was appointed satrap of Areia and after-
wards of Drangiana. In the first partition of the provinces after
412
APPENDICES
Alexander's death he was confirmed in his satrapy; but in the
partition made at Triparadeisos he received the more important
government of Baktria and Sogdiana. He ruled his subjects
with justice and moderation. He is not heard of in history after
316 B.C.
Stateira or Barsin^, the daughter of Darius and wife of
Alexander, was murdered after his death by Roxana with the
consent of the regent Perdikkas.
Stephanos of Byzantium was the author of a geographical
lexicon, in which the names of some Indian towns occur. His
date is uncertain, but may be referred to the sixth or seventh
century of our aera.
Strabo, the great geographer, was a native of Amasea in
Pontos. He lived in the reign of Augustus, and during the first
five years at least of Tiberius.
SiBYRTios was appointed by Alexander on returning from
India satrap of Karmania, and afterwards of Arachosia and
Gedrosia in succession to Thoas. He was confirmed in his
government in accordance with the first and the second partition
of the provinces. He incurred the displeasure of Eumenes, and
thereby secured the patronage of Antigonos. Megasthenes was
his friend, and at one time resided with him.
Taur6n was an officer in Alexander's army, who distinguished
himself in the battle with Poros.
TAXiLfes, whose personal name was Omphis, ruled a fertile
territory between the Indus and Hydaspes, which had for its
capital the great and flourishing city of Taxila. He was at feud
with his neighbour, King Poros, and this probably determined
him to send an embassy to Alexander while he was yet in Bak-
tria, in the hopes of forming an alliance with him which would
enable him to crush his powerful rival. He waited on Alexander
before he had crossed the Indus, and when he reached Taxila
entertained him and his army with the most liberal hospitality.
After the defeat and submission of Poros, Alexander effected a
reconciliation between the two princes. Taxiles gave all the
assistance in his power to help forward the construction and
equipment of the fleet by which Alexander intended to convey
a portion of his troops down the Hydaspes and the Indus to the
ocean. For this service he was rew^arded with an accession of
territory. After the death of Alexander he was allowed to retain
his power, which had been increased after the murder of the
satrap Philip. Subsequently to the year 321 B.C. Eudemos
seems to have exercised supreme authority in his province. We
APPENDICES
413
know nothing regarding Taxiles after that date. M. Sylvain
Levi shows that the personal name of Taxiles is incorrectly
given by Diodoros as Mophis instead of Omphis, which is the
form in Curtius. He gives the reason thus : " The study of the
words transcribed from the Indian languages into Greek proves
that the o corresponds to an a or to an in Sanskrit, while the
<\> is the regular transcription of bh. Mophis gives therefore a
Sanskrit Mobhi or Mdbhi ; neither the one nor the other is met
with in the texts ; they are both strangers to the language as well
as to the history of India. But Ambhi presents itself in the Gana-
patha, a genuine appendix to the Grammar of Panini." He then
shows that Ambhi has been obtained from Ambhas in accordance
with an established rule, and thus proceeds : " A double con-
clusion unfolds itself — ist, The dynasty which was reigning at
Taks'as'ila at the time of the Greek invasion was a family of
Kshatriya descended from Ambhas, and designated by the
patronymic Ambhi ; 2nd, The dynasty Ambhi has disappeared
with the Greek rule soon after the death of Alexander. The
revolt of India has swept away without doubt these allies of the
stranger. Before the end of the fourth century B.C., Chandragupta,
founder of the Mauryan dynasty and king of the Prasyas, joined
to his dominions the kingdoms of the basin of the Indus. Tak-
s'as'ila became the residence of a Mauryan governor. The
part played by the Ambhi does not appear to have been con-
siderable enough to preserve their memory long ; the mention of
them in the Gana-pdtha is the only known testimony to their
existence. The Ga?ia-pdtha, and, at the same time, the Gramfnar
of Panini, which is inseparable from it, are then very probably
conteffiporary with the Macedonian invasion.'^ He adds as a
footnote, "The mention of the Yavanas (Greeks) and of the
Yavanani (Greek writing) excludes the hypothesis of priority"
{^QQ Journal Asiatique for 1890, pp. 234-236).
Terioltes, called also Tyriaspes, was appointed satrap of
the Paropamisadai, but was deposed, or, according to Curtius,
put to death for misgovernment. His satrapy Alexander then
gave to his father-in-law Oxyartes.
Tlepolemos was appointed satrap of Karmania by Alexander
on his return from India.
Tyriaspes. — See Terioltes.
Vindusara, the son of Sandrokottos. — See Sandrokottos.
Xandrames, king of Magadha. — See Sandrokottos.
INDICES
I. GENERAL INDEX
II. INDEX OF AUTHORITIES QUOTED OR REFERRED TO
I. GENERAL INDEX
N.B. — When a person or place is designated by two or more names more or less
different, these names are generally given together. The modern names
of ancient cities, rivers, etc., are bracketed in italics. Proper names
which appear in one part of the text spelled after the Greek form, and
in another after the Latin, will be found indexed under the Greek
form ; hence names which commonly begin with C should be looked
for under K.
Abars or Sous, 344
Abastanoi, 155, 252, 292-3
Abisara {Hazara), 375
Abisares, 69, ']6y 92, 112, 115, 129,
202, 203, 216, 274, 278, 380, 402
Abreas, 146-8, 150
Abyla, 123
Acacia, 171
Acadira, 64
Achaimenids, 31, 34
Achilles, Achilleus, 15, 246, 286
Adraistai, Adrestae, 116, 279, 323
Adrapsa, 39
Agalasseis, 232, 285, 324, 366-7
Agathokles, 371
Agema, the Royal Escort, 20
Aghor, river, 168
Agrammes, Xandrames, 221-2, 281-2,
407, 409, 413
Agrianians, 20 passim
Ahmedabad, 134
Ahwaz, 262
Aigina, Aegina, island of, 150
Aigyptos, river. See Nile
Airavati, river. See Hydraotes
Aithiopians, 85, 132
Ajanta, Caves of, 186
Ajax, the elephant of Poros, 215
Akbar, 407
Akesines, Asiknt, Chandrabhaga
Sandabala, river (C/iendd). Its
confluence
the voyage
source, and direction of its course,
87, 88 ; its Vedic name, 93 ; de-
scribed by Ptolemy Soter, 11 2-3;
crossed by Alexander, 113, and re-
crossed, 129-30, 284, 324; its
turbulent confluence with the
Hydaspes, 137-9 ; its
with the Indus, 155 ;
down its stream, 350
Aleimachos, 249
Alexander Aigos, 50, 404
a young Macedonian hero, 19S-9
King of Epeiros, 380
the Great, his birth, education,
and accession to the throne,
15, 16 ; crosses into Asia,
defeats the Persians in three
great battles, and takes Baby-
lon, Sousa, and Persepolis, 17-
34 ; pursues and overtakes
Darius, 34, 35 ; invades Hyr-
kania, quells revolt of the
Areians, crosses the Indian
Kaukasos, reduces Baktria and
Sogdiana and defeats the
Skythians, 35-44 ; recrosses the
Kaukasos, subdues the tribes
of Northern Afghanistan,
crosses the Indus, defeats
Poros, subdues the Panjab and
valley of the Indus, and returns
2 E
4iS
GENERAL INDEX
by way of Gedrosia, Karmania,
Persis and Sousis to Babylon,
57-328 ; his death and char-
acter, 47, 48 ; his personal
appearance and habits, 48,
49 ; his dress and arms, 147 ;
wars of his successors, 49-53 ;
general results of his eastern
expedition, 3-5 ; list of his
historians and estimate of their
credibility, 6-15
Alexandreia in Egypt, 27, 49, 80
now Herat, 37
Eschate, 41
under Kaukasos, 39, 44, 58, 80,
331-2
near Mithankot, 253
Alikasudara, Alexander, King of
Epeiros, 374 ^
Alingar, river {A'ow)y 61
Alishang, river, 61
Alketas, 50, 57, 68, 69, 97, 374,
382
Allahabad, 184
Allitrochades, Vindusara, 383, 405,
409
Alur, 157, 165, 353-4
Altars of Alexander on the Hyphasis,
129, 215, 230, 234, 284, 311,
348-50
Amastris, 393
Amazons, 42, 340
Amb, 77
Ambashtha, Sambastai, Abastanoi,
155
Ambiger, 356, 375
Ambri, probably the Malloi, 324-5
Amisea, birthplace of Strabo, 4 1 2
Amnion, an Egyptian deity identified
by the Greeks with Zeus, 27, 49,
135, 164, 282
Amphipolis, 396, 404
Amritsar, supposed by some to occupy
the site of Sangala ; its name
means "Pool of immortality," 348
Amtikina, Antigonos Gonatas, 374
Amyntas, 8, 58, 375-6
Anabasis of Xenophon, 10
Anamis, river [Mindh]^ 397
Anaximenes, 8
Andaka, Andela, 62, 194
Androsthenes, 8, 376
Ankyra {Angora)^ 24
Antigenes, 50, 104, 160, 209, 376
Antigonos, 50, 51, 369, 375-6, 382-
4, 385, 394, 398, 399» 400-1,
406, 410, 412
Gonatas, King of Macedonia, 52,
^376, 380
Doson, 377
Antiochos, a commander of the
Ilypaspists, 76
father of Seleukos Nikator, 409
I. surnamed Soter King of Syria,
6, 317
II. King of Syria, 52, 377, 380
III. King of Syria, 52, 53
Antipater, Regent of Macedonia, 19,
50, 377-8, 393, 394» 400, 402
Antiyoka, Antiochos II., 52, 374
Antoninus Pius, 9
Antony, Mark, 253
Ants, gold-digging, 85, 341-2
Aornis. See Aornos, Rock of
Aornos, a city of Baktria, 39
Aornos, Rock of, 70-3, 76, 124, 197,
271, 285, 322, 336-9, 410
Apama, wife of Seleukos Nikator
and mother of Antiochos Soter, 409
Apelles, 49
Apes, Indian, 277-8
Aphrikes. See Eryx
Apollodotos, 372
Apollonios, 344, 349, 378
Apollophanes, 169, 177, 378
Arabios, Arabis, river [Purali\ 167,
168, 262, 397
Arabitai, Arabites, 167, 262, 296
Arachosia, 38, 88 passim
Arachosians, 249, 262
Aral, Sea of, 17, 41
Aratrioi, 116
Aratta, 406
Araxes, river {Bund-Amfry the Bend-
ameer of Moore), 33
Arbela. See under Battle •
Areia, 36, 38, 298, 411
Archelaos, a geographer in Alex-
ander's Expedition, 8
Argos, 124
Argyraspides, the silver-shielded, 20,
321, 376
Ariaspians, Euergetai, i.e. Benefactors,
Aribes. See Arabitai
Arigaion, 64
Ariobarzanes, 33, 378
Arispai, 367
GENERAL INDEX
419
Aristoboulos, 7, 44, 378
Aristonous, 180, 240, 379
Aristophylai, 58
Aristotle, 15, 44, 379-80, 392
Arjunayana, Agalassians, 367
Armael, Armabil. See Harmatelia
Armour, 20,000 suits of, received by
Alexander, 231
Arrhidaios, Alexander's half-brother,
SO
Arrhybas, 394
Arrian, life of, 9-10
Arrow, Indian, described as long and
heavy, 210; Alexander wounded
by one at Massaga, 195 ; and in
the Mallian stronghold, 148, 239,
289, 312, 325 ; Ptolemy wounded
by one tipped with poison, 255-6,
294-5j 326 ; the kind used by
Indian king in hunting, 189
Arsakes, 129, 377, 380
Arsinoe, mother of Ptolemy Soter,
402-3
Artabazos, 36, 39, 376, 380, 385,
393» 395, 398, 403
Artabios, river. See Arabios
Artakoana, 36
Artaxerxes III,, 380
Artemidoros, 380
Artemision, 150
Asikni, river. See Akesines
Asklepiadai, 149
Asklepios, Aesculapius, 380
As'oka, king of Magadha, grandson of
Chandragupta, 52, 187, 343, 374,
376, 377, 380, 381, 404, 407, 409
Inscription of, 372-3
Aspasioi, war with the, 60-5, 333-4,
339
Ass, wild, 186-7
Assacanus, 194
Assakenoi, Assacani, defeat of the,
65-6, 333-4
Astes, 381
Atari, 143, 352
Athena, Minerva, 146, 200, 400
Athenaios, 381
Athenodoros, 247, 381
Athens, 362, 363, 379, 384, 386,
389
Athos, Mount, 379
Atlas, Mount, 123
Attak, Attock, 72, 78, 84, 131, 343
Attakenoi, 114
Attalos, uncle of Kleopatra the wife of
King Philip, Alexander's father,
16, 17, 381
Attalos, Commander of the Agrian-
ians, 381
Attalos, one of Alexander's great
officers, 51, 57, 62, 64, 69, 98,
160, 206, 375, 382
Augustus, II, 13, 15, 389, 412
Aurengzeb, 254
Austanes, 57
Ayek, river, 141
Babylon, 29, 31, 32, 47, 122, 325,
327, 385, 388-9, 400, 402, 410
Bacchus. See Dionysos
Bahawalpur, 350
Bahika, 350
Baitian Mountains {Washati)^ 167,
298
Baiton, one of Alexander's AletisoreSy
8, 331, 345, 382
Baktra {Balkk)^ 39, 41, 44, 58, 247
Baktria, 34, 37 ; conquered by Alex-
ander, 41-4 ; included in the
dominions of Seleukos Nikator,
410 ; made an independent king-
dom by Theodotos, 477 ; coins of
Graeco-Baktrian Kings, 370-1
Balakros, 64, 200, 382
Balarama, Indian Herakles, 70
Balistai, engines for hurling missiles, 21
Bambhra, 164
Banpur, Bunpoor, 357
Banyan-tree, Ficus Indica, 217
Barber, Indian, 282
Barce, 326
Bargosa, Barygaza {Baroch), 389
Battle of Arbela, 29, 150, 380, 393,
395,
with the Aspasians, 65
of Chaironeia, Chaeronea, 1 6
of Chilian wala, 103
of Gaugamela. See Arbela
of the Granikos, 21-3, 150, 225,
392, 395
of the Hydaspes, 4, 100-10,
203-14, 307-8, 345-6, 360-1,
393, 395
of Ipsos, 51, 376, 410
of Issos, 25, 29, 30, 394, 395,
402
with the Kathaians, 116-9, 217-
8, 279, 323
420
GENERAL INDEX
Battle of Kounaxa, Cunaxa, 19
of Kynoskephalai, 21
with the Mallei, 145, 236
of Meani, 30-1
Barsine, Stateira, daughter of Darius,
and wife of Alexander, 46, 382,
398, 404
Barzaentes, 37, 203, 382
Bazar, 194, 335
Bazaria {Bokhara ? ), 43
Bazira, 67, 70-i» 335
Beas, river. See Hyphasis
Bean, the Egyptian, 131
Begram, plain of, 332
Beira, 194
Bela, 356-7
Beluchistan, 170
Belus, temple of, 31
Beryls, Indian, 220
Bessos, Satrap of Baktria, 34, 35»
36, 39-40, 41, 76, 150, 382-3,
398, 410
Bhakar, 160, 353, 354
Bheranah, 116
Bhimber, 366
Bhira, Bheda, 136
Bibasis, river. See Hyphasis
Bidaspes, river. See Hydaspes
Birds, Indian, which talk, 1S6
Biton, 247-8
Bokhara, 41
Bolan Pass, 160, 354, 382, 393, 403
Bolitai {A'adu/is), 158
Bosporos, 90
Boukephala, a city founded in honour
of Alexander's favourite horse, no,
130, 231, 277, 284, 309, 323
Boukephalos, Boukephalas, Alex-
ander's favourite horse, loi, no,
III, 309. 323, 212
Boumodos, river, 150
Boxos, 185, 247-8
Brahmanabad, 353, 355, 356
Brachmans, Brahmans, 143, 159,
160, 293, 306, 343, 358-9, 362,
368, 378, 392, 395
Brahmaputra, river, 184, 367
Branchidai, 282
Bridge made over the Indus, 72, 78,
83, 90, 272
Bridging of rivers, 90- 1
Buddha, 408
Buddhism, 381
Buddhists, 359
Bulls, Indian, 202
Burindu, Parenos, river, 77, 339
Burma, 187
Byzantium {Constantinople^, 379
Caesar, 12, 13, 14, 214
Calingae, 364
Camp, Alexander's, on the Hydaspes,
344-5
Cedrosia. See Gedrosia
Cerealis, a Roman General, 227
Ceylon, 374
Chachar. See Chuchpur
Chaironeia. See under Battle
Chanakya, 370, 408, 409
Chandrabhaga, river. See Akesines
Chandragupta, King of Palibothra.
See Sandrokottos
Chares, Cares, 7, 44, 383
Charikar, 38, 331
Chariots, war, 207
Charus, a brave Macedonian youth,
198, 199
Chenab, river. See Akesines
Chittral, 61
Choarene, 160
Choaspes, river, 61, 62, 64, 194,
338^
Chremes, an Athenian Archon, no,
273-4
Chuchp{ir, Chachar, 156, 293, 253
Cicero, 1 1
Claudius, 11, 395
Cleochares, 92, 203
Cleophis, Queen of Massaga, 194,
196-7, 269, 322, 335, 383
Clitarchos. See Kleitarchos
Coins, Roman, 372 ; Indian, 201
Colonies founded by Alexander, 58
Colonists, Baktrian, 289
Comorin, Cape, 184
Companion, Cavalry, ^^'j passim
Confluence of the Hydaspes and
Akesines, 137-9, 233-4, 286
of the Akesines and Hydraotes,
155, 242, 352
of the united stream of the
Panjab rivers (called the
Akesines, now the Panjnad)
with the Indus, 155
of the Hyphasis with the Satlej,
120-1, 349
of the Hyphasis (Satlej ?) with
the Akesines, 155
GENERAL INDEX
421
Constantine the Great, 408
Corinth, Isthmus of, 150
Cornelius, P., 274
Cotton, 186, 188
Crete, 386
Crocodiles, 139
Cuphetes, river, 323
Curtius, Q. Rufus, life of, 10-12
Cutch, a colouring matter, 171
Cyprus, 27
Cyropolis, 40
Cyrus the Great, 17, 34, 38, 40, 46,
86, 170, 173, 358
Cyrus the Younger, 19
Daedala, Daidala, 64, 194, 322,
335
Daedali Mountains {Mt. Dantalokl),
64, 335
Dahae, Dahans, 208, 225
Daityas, 83
Damascus, 26
Damis, 344
Dandamis. See Mandanes
Dardai, 341
Dardistan, 187
Darius Hystaspes, divides his empire
into satrapies, 18 ; copy of his seal,
29 ; was paid tribute by the
Arabitai and Oreitai, 167
Kodomannos, state of the Persian
empire at his accession to the
throne, 18, 19; defeat of his
army at the Granikos, 21, 22 ; |
at Issos, 24-6 ; his treasures
and family seized at Damas-
cus, his offers to Alexander !
rejected, 28 ; his defeat at I
Gaugamela, and flight to |
Arbela, 29-31 ; his flight from
Ekbatana and assassination,
34, 35 ; Arrian's estimate of
his character, 35 ; his contrast
to Poros, 108, 346
Dataphernes, 39
Deimachos, 8, 383, 405
Delta of the Indus, Patalene, 84,
160, 352-3, 356
of the Nile, 357
Demetrios, one of the Somatophy-
lakes, 38, 383, 403
Son of Pythonax, 69, 98, 104,
114, 144, 360, :^^z
Poliorketes, son of Antigonos,
and King of Macedonia, 51,
151, ?>7^, 383, 400
Demophon, 236, 287
Demosthenes, 16, 381
Derbend, 77
Desert east of the Indus, 221
Dhanananda, 408
Diamouna, river. See lomanes
{Ja7?i}td)
Debal, 169
Dilawar, 97
Dimachai, 21
Dimoirites, DupHcarius, 146, 147
Diodoros Sic, life of, 13-14
Diodotos of Erythrai, 8
Diogenes, 315, 391, 398
Diognetos, 8, 331, 345
Dionysopolis. See Nysa
Dionysos, Bacchus, 5, 79, 80, 82,
124, 136, 154, 179, 191, 192,
226, 252, 265, 299, 317, 321,
340, 351
Dioskorides, 384
Dioxippos, a famous Athenian athlete,
249, 250-1, 290-2, 351
Dir, j6
Diridotis [Teredofi), 397
Doanas, river. See Dyardanes
Dog and lion fight, 220-1, 280,
363-4
Dogs, Indian, 363-4
Dorsanes, Indian Heraklts, 70
Doxares, 92
Drachma, Greek silver coin, 372
Drangiana {Seisfdn), 37, 298, 411
Dudhial, 345
Drypatis, daughter of Darius and
wife of Hephaistion, -^^6
Dyades, 196
Dyardanes, river {Brahmaputra ? )
184
Dyrta, 76
Edom, 186
Ekbatana, capital of Media {Hama-
dan), 30, 34, 47, 126, 362, 384,
385, 386, 392^
Elam, Mount, Ram Takht, 338-9
Elburz Mountains, 35
Elephants, presented to Alexander by
Taxiles, 58; by Abisares, 112;
objects of terror to horses, 96 ;
part played by them in the battle
of the Hydaspes, 103-6, 208-13,
422
GENERAL INDEX
274-5, 30S y Sandrokottos gives
five hundred to Seleukos Nikator
in exchange for the Fanjab and
territories west of the Indus, 410
Embolima, 72, 200, 336-7
Emodoi Mountains {Himiilayas), 131
Enotokoitai, a fabulous race, 405
Eordaia, 399
Ephemerides {Daily Gazelle)^ 7» 384
Epiktetos, 9, 384
Erannoboas, river {Sdn)y 187, 407
Eratosthenes, 384
Erix, Eryx, Aphrikes, 77, 200, 272,
378
Erythrae, 341
Erythraian Sea, 13, 183, 1 85
Erythrus, 185
Etymander, river {Hdmiind)^ 38,
184
Euaspla, Choaspes, river, 62
Eudemos, 45, 177, 384, 406, 412
Eudoxos, 1 88
Euergetai. See Ariaspians
Eukratides, 343, 344
Eumenes, Alexander's secretary, 7,
8, 50, 51, 119, 218, 369, 375,
376, 380-5, 393. 398-401, 406,
410, 412
Euphrates, river, 24, 29, 47, 88, 91,
123, 262, 296, 301
Euryalus, 198
Eu thy demos, 53
Ficus Indica. See Banyan-tree
Firuzabad, 169
Gadeira {Cadiz), 123
Gadrosoi. See Gedrosioi
Gandhara, 59, 62, 333, 364, 399
Gandaridai, 279, 323
Gandaris, 112, 133, 134
Gangaridae {Gonghns)^ 221, 28 1, 283,
310, 364.5
Gange, 365
Ganges, river, 12, 13, 84, 123, 183,
184, 221, 234-5, 310, 349, 353,
367, 393, 407
Gates, Amanian, 25
Kaspian, 34, 122
Kilikian, 223
Persian {A'aleh Safed), 33, 378
Syrian, 24
Gaugamela. See under Battle
Gaza, 27, 400
Gedrosioi, 169, 17 1-2, 175, 179,
180, 262-4, 296, 298, 317, 401,
412
Gesteani. See Kathaians
Ghara, river, 162
Ghori, tribes of, 66
Girnar, 374
Glaukias, murderer of Roxana, 404
Glausai, Glaukanikoi, III
Gods, Indian, 191
Gold, 187, 341-2
Gordian knot, 24
Gordion, Gordium, 24
Gorgias, 59, 98, 385
Gorys or Gorydale, 61, 62
Gouraios, river {Paiijkora), 60, 66
Granikos, river. See under Battle
Griffins, Gryphons, 85
Gundulbar, 134
Gymnosophists. See Philosophers
Hadrian, 9
Hages, 207
Haidarabad, Patala, 84, 165, 167,
353, 355-7, 396
Halikarnassos, 23
Hannibal, 23, 100, 237
Harapa, 141
Harmatelia, 256, 294-5, 355
Harpalos, cousin of Alexander, 230,
379, 385-6, 396
Hasan Abdal, 342
Hashtnagar, 59, 339, 342
Haur. See Ora
Hegelochos, admiral of Alexander's
fleet in the Aegean Sea, 28
Hegemon, an Athenian Archon, 95,
no, 214
Hekataios, 386
Hekatompylos {Damaghanl), 35, 36
Helikon, a Rhodian artificer, 147
Heliokles, 37 1
Hellespont, 90, 122, 410
Helmund, river. See Etymander.
Henry IV. of France, 246
Hephaistion, 38, 45, 47, 59, 60, 71,
78, 83, 98, 114, 121, 129, 133,
136, 137, 139, 161, 162, 167-9,
180, 191, 201, 202, 209, 262,
279, 281, 285, 381, 385, 386,
392-3
Herakles, Hercules, 5, 15, 28, 70,
71, 82, 124, 135, 191, 197, 208,
GENERAL INDEX
423
226, 232, 271, 285, 290, 322,
341, 366
Herakles, son of Alexander by Barsine,
398, 402
Herakon, 178, 386
Herat, 37, 298
Hermes, 356
Hermolaos, 44, 246, 403
Hermos, river, 89
Herodotos, 18, 70
Hesidrus, river. See Satlej
Hiacensanae. See Agalassi
Hieronymos, 7
Hieropolis, 384
Hindu-Kush Mountains, 407
Himyar, 185
Hingul, river, 169
Hippasioi. See Aspasioi
Hiranyagupta, 409
Hoplites, 60
Horratas, Horatus, Koragos, 249-51,
290-2, 390-3, 351
Houpian, Opiane, 332
Hydaspes, river, Vitasta, Bedasta {Jhi-
lam, Jheliun), 84, 88, 92-5, 129-
39, 202, 204, 229, 230, 345-6,
350, 396, 400, 409, 412
Hydraotes, river {Kavi\ 84, 88, 114,
115, 120, 129, 141, 144, 154, 155,
217, 232, 347, 352, 401
Hylobioi, Indian ascetics of the w^oods,
358, 368
Hypanis, river. See Hyphasis
Hypaspists, 20, do passim
Hyphasis, river, Hypanis Vipasa {Beas
Beias), 8S, 112, 114, 120, 121, 126,
129, 155, 221, 281, 345, 347-8,
401, 411
Hyrkania, 35, 124, 401
Hyrkanian Sea {//le /Caspian), 87,
122-3
Hwen Thsiang, a Chinese pilgrim,
168
Iarchas, 378
Ichthyophagoi, 169, 171, 172, 180,
262-3, 298, 316, 397
Ida, Mount, 21
Ilion, Troy, 23, 146, 148, 40 1
Illyrians, 20, 124, 245
India, general description of, 85-6,
183-191
hidikay Arrian's, 10, 86
of Megasthenes, 10, 407-8
Indus, river, sources of, 84 ; itsbreadth,
85, 155; its length, 161, 231 ; its
bifurcation, 162 ; changes of its
course, 157, 158-9, 353; its mouths,
164-6, 191, 257-61; its tides, 163,
258-61, 367 ; its resemblance to
the Nile, 132
Infanticide, practised in the Panjab,
219, 280, 347
Interment of the dead, curious mode
of, among the Oreitai, 297
lomant'S, river, Yamuna {Jamnd)^ 93,
184
Ionia, 23, 122
Istros, river {Danube), 90
Ivy, 80, 82, 193
JalAlAbad, 61, 62, 333, 338
Jalalpur, 94, 97, no, 129, 344, 345,
349
Jaxartes, river, 40, 41, 86, 88, 122,
245, 411
Jhilam, Jhelum, a town, 94, 97, 129,
344, 345
river. See Hydaspes
Johiyas. See Ossadioi
Juno, 135
Kabul, river, 3, 323
Kach Gandava, 157, 354
Kachh, Gulf of, 221
Ran of, 165, 353
Kafiristan, 61, 332-3
Kafirs, 340
Kaikeyas, 349, 363
Kaikos, river, 89
Kailasa, Mount, 84
Kalaka Serai, 342
Kalama, 316
Kalanos, 46, 301, 315, 343, 386-92
Kallisthenes, 8, 44, 58, 379, 380,
392
Kalpe {Rock of Gibraltar), 123
Kalsi, 374
Kambistholi, 114
Kambyses, 403
Kandahar, 38, 112
Kanishka, 344, 392
Kanoje, Kanyakubja, 366
Kappadokia, 9, 24, 122
Karachi, 164, 167, 262, 297, 396
Karchedon {Carthage), 127
Kardia, 7
Karians, 132
424
GENERAL INDEX
Karmania, 45, 160, 169, 1 79, 1 80,
397, 412, 413
Kartazon, Unicorn, 186-7
Karun, river, 262, 397
Kashmir, 69, in, 112
Kaspatyros, 341
Kassander, 51, 379, 394, 398, 402,
404, 410
Kassandreia, 37S
Katanes, 57
Katapeltai {Catcipiilts), 21
Kathaia, 133, 347, 369
Kathaians, 115, 279, 323, 406
Kathiawar, 347
Kaukasos, Mount, 58, 83, 84, 87, 88,
95, 122, 131, 183
Kaystros, river, 89
Kedj, 357 ^
Kekaya, Kekeoi. See Kaikeyas
Kelainai, Caelaenae, 23
Kerkion (A/at/m?)^ 186
Keteus, 369
Khaiber Pass, 59, 60, 385
Khoes, river {Ao^v), 61
Khojent, 40
Khorasmians, King of the, 42
Kh orient's, 44, 59
Kijil, 39
KiUkia, Cilicia, 24-6, 223, 384
Killouta. See Skilloustis
Kleander, 178, 392
Kleisobara, 184
Kleitarchos, Clitarchus, 8, il
Kleitos, 22, 38, 43, 59, 98, 116, 140,
203, 380, 386, 392-3
Kleopatra, Alexander's half-sister, 394
Queen of Egypt, 253, 403
Knidos, 149, 380
Koa, river {Kabul R.), 61
Koinos, Coenus, 98, 104, 105, 113,
114, 125, 127, 128, 133, 194, 200,
209, 227, 229, 230, 360, 393
Kophes, Kophen, river {A'alntl), 43,
59, 61, 62, 66, 69, 70, 72, 73, 78,
79, 93, 323, 334, 33^, 339, 3^4
Koragos. See Horratas
Kori, river, 165
Kos, island of, 149, 241, 380
Kos Meropis, 112
Kot Kamalia, 141
Krateros, 35, 36, 42, 44, 45, 47,
50, 57, 62, 64, 66, 97, 98, 102,
107, III, 114, 133, 136, 137, 139,
157, 158, 160, 177, 191, 192, 205,
243, 252, 285, 354, 375-6, 382,
393, 400, 402
Kretheus, 172
Krishna, 355
Kritoboulos, 241
Kritodemos, 149, 241
Kshatri. Sec Xathroi
Kshatriya caste, 347, 401
Kunar, river. See Choaspes
Kydnos, Cydnus, river, 24
Kynane, Alexander's half-sister, 375
Kyrene, 28, 384
Kyrsilos, 8, 393
Kyzikos, Cyzicus, 21
Lagos, reputed father of Ptolemy
Soter, 40^/>asstm
Lahore, 114, 161, 348
Lampsakos, 8
Landai, river, 59, 66, 72
Laodike, 377
Larissa, 8
Larkhana, 158
Leonidas, one of Alexander's tutors,
15
Leonnatos, 51, 61, 64, 65, 146, 147,
148, 150, 162, 166, 169, 179, 209,
240, 261-2, 264, 297, 299, 394, 397,
399
Libya, 122, 123
Limnaios, 312
Livy, 12
Lizards, 339
Lydia, 122
Lykia, 23, 122
Lysimachia, 410
Lysimachos, one of Alexander's tutors,
afterwards King of Thrace, 15, 50,
51, 98, 119, 180, 388, 394, 410
Lysippos, 49
Maedi, 245
Magadha (BiMr), 365-6, 380, 404-8
Magas, 52, 374, 380
Mahaban, Alount. See Aornos
Mahorta, 158
Maiandros, Maeander, river, 23, 89
Maiotic, Lake {Sea of Azof )^ 87
Malan, Cape, 168
Malayaketu, 409
Malloi {People of Mult An), 4, 115,
137, 139, 140, 144, 149, 154,
179, 234, 236-40, 311, 350, 400
Manchur, Lake, 355
GENERAL INDEX
425
Mandanes, Dandamis, head of the
Gymnosophists, 315, 386, 391
Manikyala, 344
Mansura, 355
Marakanda {Samatrand)^ 40, 41, 43
Marcus Aurelius, 9
Mardians of Persis, 34
of Hyrkania, 36
Mardonios, 16
Mareotis, Lake, 27
Marginia {Margittan), 42
Marius, Roman Consul, 241
Markianos, Marcian, 380
Mar-Koh. See Meros
Mars, God of War, 290
Marsyas, river, 23
Marsyas, a Pellaian educated with
Alexander, 379
Masianoi (People of Massaga?), 339
Massaga, Massaka, Masoka, Mazaga,
66, 67, 71, 194, 269, 306, 334,
338-9, 375
Maurya, 408
Medos, river {Polvar)^ 33
Megasthenes, 394-5, 405, 407
Mekran, 170, 357, 397
Mela, Pomponius, 395
Meleager, 51, 58, 59, 98, 160, 203,
395, 410
Memnon the Rhodian, 21, 23, 28,
230, 264, 395, 398
Memphis, 27, 28, 31, 49, 282
Menander, a Graeko-Baktrian king,
332
Menelaos, 89
Mentor, brother of Memnon the
Rhodian, 395
Mercenaries, Indian, 269-70, 306
Meroes, 108, 109
Meros, Mount, 80, 81, 193, 33^-9,
340
Meshed, capital of Khorasan, 36,
298
Meta, 197
Methora {Muttra), 184
Midas, 24
Mieza, 400
Miletos, 23, 89, 172, 386
Minerva. See Athena
Mithankot, 156, 253, 293
Mitylene, 7, 384
Moeres, Moeris, 256, 357
Moghsis, 157
Mong. See Nikaia
Monsoon, 164, 166, 167, 396
Mounychion, an Athenian month, 95,
no
Mousikanos, 157, 158, 160, 217, 253,
293, 356, 395, 399, 400, 404
Mudra Rakshasa, a Hindu drama, 409
Miiller, Professor Max, 359
Mullinus, Eumenes(?), 197, 248-9,
395
Multan, 114, 139, 143, 161, 353,
352
Mura, 409
Mushti Mountains {IVashati)^ 357
Muttari, 165
Mykale, Mount, 87
Myrrh-trees, 170
Nanda, 409
Nandrus, 327, 405-6
Nangnihar, Nanghenhar, 333, 338
Napoleon, 24, 32
Narayanasaras, a lake at the mouth of
the Indus, 166, 261
Nard, 170
Naukratis, 38 1
Nautaka {Kurshee or Kesh), 43
Nearchos, 7, 10, 45, 46, 50, 76,
86, 87, 123, 134, 139, 164, 165,
185, 186, 261-3, 296, 300, 316,
376, 379, 385, 394-8
Neko, 123
Neoritae, 168
Nerbada, river, 367
Nero, 384
Neudros, river, 114
Nikaia {Moiig), no, 130, 134, 161,
231, 284, 323, 332, 344, 350, 398
Nikanor, 58, 72
Nikomedeia {Is??uknid), birthplace of
Arrian, 9
Nile, river, 27, 89, 131, 123
Nora, 197
Numidia, 123
Nysa, 79, 81, 124, 133, 192, 194,
305, 321, 338-40
Nysatta, 339
Oarakta, Island of (AVj/zw), 185
Oasis, Libyan, 135
Ochos, a Persian King, 46
Ochos, river {Aksou), 42
Gidipous, Oedipus, 408
Ohind, 78, 337
Olympias, mother of Alexander, 15,
426
GENERAL INDEX
51, 132, 135, 247, 377-9, 381,
385, 398
Olynthos, 8, 392
Omphis, Mophis. ^tv Taxiles
Onesikritos, 315-6, 134, 261, 379.398
Opiane (Houpiihi), 331
Ora (Hatir})^ 69, 71, 169, 173, 180,
375^
Ordanes, 178
Oreitai, 167-9, 256, 262, 264, 296-7,
316, 394, 397
Orestis, iSo, 393, 400
Orobatis {Arabulli)^ 72
Oromenus, Mount, the Salt range, 93,
94, 134, 156, 411
Orosius, 398
Ortospanum {/Cabnl)^ 58, 331, 33S
Orxines, 45, 46
Oryx, 187
Ossadioi, Yaudheya, Johiyas, 156, 252
Ouxians, Uxians, no, in
Ouxian Pass (near Bebehan), ^'^
Oxus, river {Ami} darya), 39, 41, 411
Oxyartes, father of Ruxana, one of
Alexander's wives, 42, 44, 156,
157, 253, 398, 404, 412
Oxydrakai, 137, 149, 154, 234, 236,
248-9, 287, 324-5
Oxykanos, Porticanus, 15S, 253-4,293
Ozines, 264
Pages, Royal, 198
conspiracy of the, 44, 58, 392
Paionians, Paeonians, 20
Paktyike, 341
Palestine, 27
Palibothra, Palimbothra, Pataliputra
{Pdtnd), 8, 71, 187, 366, 405, 407,
408
Pallakopas, river, 397
Pamphylia, 122
Pandaia, daughter of Indian Ilerakles,
70
Panini, the great Indian grammarian,
399 •
Panjnad, river, 155
Panjshir, river, 39, 61, 70
Paper, 186
Paphlagonia, 24, 122
Papyrus, 186
Paraitakai, 43, 44, 57, 375
Paraitonion, Paraetonium, 28
Parmenion, 24-6, 29, 30, 34, 37,
178, 393, 399, 410
Paropamisadai, 58, 59, 82, 83, 253,
399, 413
Paropamisos, Paropanisos, Mountains
of, 38, 58, 82, 87, 410
Parrots, 186
Parsioi, 58
Parthalis, 364
Parthyaia, Parthia, 298, 401
Parysatis, said to have been wife of
Alexander, 46
Pasargadai, 34, 45, 123
Pasitigris, Karun, river, 397
I'atala {Haidardb&d), 84, 161, 162,
165-7, 256, 261, 356-7, 396
Patalene, Indus Delta, 161, 357
Pataliputra. See Palibothra
Patna. See Palibothra
Patrokles, 8, 399
Paurava, 402
Pausanias, 399
Peacocks, Indian, 217, 362-3, 407
Pearls, 188
Peithon, son of Agenor, 157, 159,
160, 161, 165, 385, 399, 400, 402
Peithon, son of Krateuas, 50, 140,
143, 144, 180, 399
Pella, birthplace of Alexander, 15,
379, 394
Pellaians, 180
Peloponntsos, 124
Pelusium, 27
Perdikkas, 50, 57, 59, 71, 78, 98,
99, 116, 140, 141, 145-6, 149,
352, 375-9, 382-5, 395, 399, 400-
402, 404, 409, 410, 412
Perikles, 363
Petronius, 11
Peukelaotis {Hashtnagar)^ 59, 60, 72,
331, 342, 381
Peukestas, 46, 50, 51, 146-8, 150,
179, 180, 239, 312, 382, 394, 400
Perinthos, 375
Persepolis, 33, 45, 123, 378, 388
Perseus, 28, 135
Persian Gulf, 87, 123
Persians, defeat of, by the Skythians,
86
Persis, 122, 179, 386, 397
Peshawar, 59» 72
Phalanx, how organised and equipped,
19-20
Pharasii. See Prasioi
Pharnabazos, 28
Pharsalos, 8, 393
GENERAL INDEX
427
Phegelas, Phegeus, 121, 221, 281,
365, 401
Philip, King of Macedonia and father
of Alexander, 15, 212, 241, 246,
323, 379, 394, 396, 400, 402-3,
409
Philippos, Philip, one of Alexander's
great generals, 45, 65, 72, 92, 112,
133, 136, 139, 154, 155, 177, 309,
384, 401, 412
Philosophers, Indian, 190, 306,313-4,
358-9, 368-9
Philostratos, 378
Philotas, 37, 65, 198, 382, 383, 386,
398, 403
Phokion, Phocion, 402
Phraortes, 378
Phrataphernes, 112, 178, 264, 401
Phrygia, 23
Phuleli, river, 165
Phylarchos, 405
Pillars of Hercules, 123
Pimprama, 116, 217
Pinaros, river, 25
Pipal tree, 191
Pipilika, 341
Pisidia, 23
Pittakos, 411
Plato, 368, 379
Pliny, 411
Plutarch, life of, 12-3
Polyainos, 402
Polykleitos, 8, 402
Polysperchon, Polyperchon, 50, 57,
97, 139, 325, 197, 385, 393, 402
Polytimetos, river {Kohik)^ 40, 41
Pontos, 83
Poros, Poi-us, 4, 13, 92, no, 112-
5, 120, 129, 133, 202-13, 216,
222, 231, 274-6, 282, 322, 365,
386, 393, 400, 401, 405, 406, 412
nephew of, 112, 114, 133, 279
son of, loi, 102, 107
an Indian king who sent an
embassy to Augustus Caesar,
389
Portikanos. See Oxykanos
Poseidon, .164
Postumius, A., 274
Potidaia, Kassandreia, 7
Poura, 123, 172, 177, 357-8
Praesti, 158, 253
Prasioi, Praisioi, 13, 221, 281, 310,
323, 365, 349
Prasiane, 159
Precious stones, Indian, 188
Presidae. See Prasioi
Promachos, 389
Prometheus, 82, 83
Prophthasia {Furrah), 37, 38
Propontis {Sea of Mannora\ 21
Psiltoukis. See Skilloustis
Ptolemy, son of Lagos, surnamed
Soter, King of Egypt, 7, 11,
38, 40, 46, 50, 51, 61, 63-5, 73,
99, 112, 117, 139, 151, 168, 180,
194, 205-6, 209, 244, 255, 262,
295, 296-7, 355, 378-9, 380-5,
388, 394, 396, 399, 400, 402-3,
410
II. Philadelphos, 49, 377, 403
IIL Euergetes, 52, 380, 384,
403
VI. Philometor, 404
VII. Physkon, 188, 404
Keraunos, son of Ptolemy Soter,
and King of Macedonia, 410
Purali, river, 167
Pyramids of Egypt, 27
Pythagoras, 315, 391
Pythia, 282
Raja Hodi, fort of, 337
Rajapatha, Royal road, 93, 349
Rajputs, 350, 354
Rama, 168, 340
Ramayana, 168
Rambakia, 168
Ranigat, 337
Ravi, river. See Hydraotes
Rawal Pindi, 344
Red Sea, 183, 185-6
Rhagai, 34
Rhenos, river {Reno), 90
Rhine, river, 90
Rhinoceros, 186, 187
Rhodians, 147
Rhone, river, 100
Rhotas, 94, 344
Roxana, wife of Alexander, 42, 50,
156, 382, 398, 400, 404, 412
Sabagrae. See Sabarcae
Sabarcae, 155, 252
Sabbos. See Sambus
Sainte-Croix, 10, 13
Sakabda, 392
4-
X
428
GENERAL INDEX
Sakala, 411, 347
Salamis, 150
Salatura, 399
Salt Hills. See Oromenus
Salmous, 300
Samaxus, 203
Sambastai. See Abastanoi
Samkala (Sangala), 348, 411
Samudragupta, 351, 367
Sandabala (Sandabaga ?), river. See
Akesines
Sandrokottos, Androkottos, Sandro-
koptos, Chandragupta, 4, 8, 15,
53, 88, 187, 310, 327-8, 365, 380,
384, 386, 395, 399, 404-9, 410
Sangala, 4, 115-20, 217-8, 347-8,
394, 406
Sanggaios, 60
Sanglawala-Tiba, 348
Saranges, river, 114
Sarasvati, river {Siirsooty)^ 184, 365
Sard is, 23
Sarissa, the long pike of the Mace-
donians, 19, 250
Sarmans, S'ramanas, 358-9, 368, 389
Satibarzanes, 36, 38
Satlej, river, S'atadru, Zaradros, Hesy-
drus, 4, 120, 121, 155, 231, 349
Satrap, Kshatrapa, 18
Saubhuta, Realm of Sophytes, 348
Sehwan. See Sindimana
Seistan, 160
Seleukos Nikator, King of Syria, 6,
8, 50-2, 99, 100, 104, 133, 310,
327, 377, 385, 394, 399, 404, 405,
407, 409-10
Semiramis, a mythical Queen of
Assyria, 170, 173, 246, 358
Septagen, 186
Septimius Severus, 10
Serpents, Indian, 217, 361-2
Shiraz, 33
Shoes, what kind of, worn by Indians,
188
Shorekot, 139, 141
Siboi, Sibi, 139, 232, 285, 286, 324,
366
Sibyrtios, Tibyrtios, 88, 177, 264,
412
Sigambri. See Oxydrakai
Silei. See Sibi
Silphium, 39
Silver, 187, 371
Simoeis, river, 286
Sindh, 352-4, 402
Sindimana (Sehwan), 254-5, 354-5,
404
Sisikottos, Sisocostus, 76, 102, 200,
410
Sisunaga, 409
Sitalkes, 178, 410-11
S'iva, 70
Skamander, river, 286
Skilloustis, Killouta, 164, 316
Skylax, 132
Skythians, 122-4, 208, 226-7
Smyrna, 89
Sogdiana, 39
Sogdians, 225
Sogdoi, Sodrai, Seorai, 157, 293, 354
Sokrates, 9, 3I5, 39i
Solinus, 4, II
Soloi, 411
Soma, 190
Somatophylakes, Alexander's select
body-guard, names of the, 179, 180
Son, river. See Erannoboas
Sonmiyani, Bay of, 167
Sopeithes, Sopithes, Sophytes, 133,
134, 187, 219, 220-1, 279, 280-1,
348, 349, 411
Sophagasenos, 53
Souastos, river, 59, 61, 334, 335
Sourasenoi, 184
Sousa, 32, 45, 178, 301, 385, 386,
393, 394, 400, 401, 403, 409
Sousia {Sons)^ 36
Sousis, Sousiana, 397
Sparta, 16, 296
Sphines. See Kalanos
Spitakes, Pittacus, 107, 411
'Spitamenes, 39, 40-3, 379, 409, 4 II
S'ramanas. See Sarmans
Stadium, length of, 71
Stageira, 379
Stateira, daughter of Darius, and wife
of Alexander, 301, 3S6, 412
Stathmos, 8
Stephanos of Byzantium, 412
Strabo, 412
Stymphalia, 382
Sudracae. See Oxydrakai
Sudras, 351, 354, 409
Suicide, practice of, in India, 190, 306
Sunium, 150
Surat, 254
Suttee, Sati, custom of, 219, 279,
347, 369
GENERAL INDEX
429
Swat, river. See Souastos
Sword-blades of Indian steel, 252
Syrakousai. See Oxydrakai
Syria, 26 and/ajrj-zVw
Syria, Hollow, 122
TabrXnXlX. See Tiberoboam
Tapeirians, people of Taburistdn^ 35
Taprobane, Ceylon, 187, 372-4, 398
Tauala, Patala, 296
Tauron, 100, 104, 209, 412
Tauros, Mount, 23, 24, 58, 87, 88,
398
Taxila, 44, 83, 92, 107, 126, 215,
285, 342-4
Taxiles, Omphis, Mophis, 45, 58, 59,
72, 83, 92, 93, 108, 112, 177,
201-3, 212, 231, 273, 305-6, 361,
365, 371, 378, 383, 384, 386,
390, 398, 401, 402, 406, 412
Telephos, 172
Terioltes. See Tyriaspes
Tethys, ocean goddess, 216
Thapsakos, 29
Thasos, 8
Thatha, Deval, 356-7
Thebes, in Boiotia, 17, 124, 400
Theodotos, Diodotos, 52, 377
Theophilos, 147
Theophrastos, 379
Thessalians, 20, 126
Thoas, 171, 177, 412
Thracians, 20, 124, 156, 245
Thriamboi, Triumphi, 179
Tiberius, 412
Tiberoboam, river, 342-3
Tibyrtios. See Sibyrtios
Tides, Indian rivers, how affected by,
163, 256-61
Tigris, river, 29, 45, %%, 91, 123,
180, 367-8, 397
Tilla, 94
Timaeus, 240
Timagenes, 1 1
Timour, 40, 43, 261
Tiiyns, 124
Tlepolemos, 177, 413
Tmolos, Mount, 79
Tomyris, Queen of the Skythians, 86
Towers, movable, 196
Trajan, 13
Triballians, 124
Triparadeisos, 50, 412
Trogus, 15
Tulamba, 141
Tyre, 26-9, 68
Tyriaspes, 58, 112, 157, 252
UCHH, 121, 156, 351, 352
Umritsar. See Amritsar
Unicorn, 186, 187
Uras'a, 129
Utica, 127
Vasati. See Ossadioi
Vaugelas, 12
Velleius, 1 1
Vespasian, lO
Vindusara, Allitrochades, 343, 349,
380^409,413
Vipas'a. See Hyphasis
Vishnu, 70
Vitasta. See Hydaspes
WAZtRAB^D, 129
Weber, Professor, 129
Wells, dug by Alexander's orders, 261
Whales, 298, 300
Whip-snakes, 278
Wine, 190
Wives, how selected, in the kingdom
of Sophytes, 280
Writing, material used for, 186 ; art
of, known in India before Alex-
ander's time, ibid.
Xandrames. See Agrammes
Xathroi, Kshatriya, 147, 156, 252
Xenippa, 43
Xenophon, 9, 12
Xerxes, 16, t^t,, 90, 282
Xylenopolis, 316
Yamuna, river. See lomanes
Yaudheyas. See Ossadioi
Yavana, Greeks, 122, 374, 409, 413
Yemen, 185
Yusufzai, 61, 334
Zadrakarta {Sari?)j 26
Zagros, Mount, 33
Zaradros, river. See Satlej
Zariaspa, Baktra(?), 40, 41, 42, 264,
383
Zarmanochegas, Sarmanacharya, 389
Zarrah, Lake, 160, 184
li INDEX OF AUTHORITIES QUOTED OR
REFERRED TO
Abbott, General, 59, 77, 83, 194,
333, 335, 336, 338, 344
Agatharchides, 185, 263
Ailianos, Aelian, 7, 186, 190, 217,
224, 249, 263, 361, 362, 363, 365
Aischylos, 87, 153
Appian, 404
Aristoboulos, 10 1, iii, 150, 161,
165, 179, 231, 357, 361, 390
Aristotle, 93, 187, 364
Arrian, 57-180 passim
Artemidoros, 184
Athenaios, 7, 190, 196, 249, 363,
382-3, 392, 405, 409
Baber, 332, 334, 366
Bellasis, 355
Bellew, Dr., 334, 335, n-], 339, 397
Benfey, 356
Bhandarkar, 4II
Bournouf, 166
Bunbury, Sir E. H., 131, 132, 134,
160, 332, 333, 347, 349, 350, 353,
396
Burnes, Sir A., 131, 137-8, 142, 161,
344, 347, 356
Caesar, 91, 93, 117, 163, 196,218,
227
Chardin, 360
Chares, 212, 389, 392
Chesney, General, 30, 78, 94, 231,
346
Chinnock, Dr., no, 117, 170
Chronicle of Ceylon. See Mahavanso
Cicero, 214, 237, 241, 392
Clinton, 274
Court, General, 76, 194, in, 344
Cunningham, General Sir A., 78, 97,
134, 136, 139, 140, 142, 143, 156,
157, 158, 159, 163, 167, 168, 194,
293, 326, 331, 333, 335, 337, 342,
347-8, 351, 352, 354, 356, 365,
371
Curtius, iSy 266 J>assim
D'Anville, 169
Dio Cassius, 186
Diodoros Sic, 269-301 passim
Dionysios Periegetes, 167, 337
Dioskorides, 171
Droysen, 48, 104, 107, 160, 333,
356
Dryden, 33
Duncker, 86, 358-9, 363
Dutt, R. C, 369-70
Edinburgh Cabinet Library, 252,
278
Edrisi, 169
Elphinstone, Lord, 93, 132, 332, 340,
344
Elzivir Curtius, 246, 361
Epigraphia Indika, 347
Eratosthenes, 82-3, 88, 193
Freeman, Professor, 2, 13, 32, 250
Fresnel, 185
Foss, 184
Gellius, Aulus, 212, ^S^
Grote, 5, 48, 250, 346
Gutschmid, 327
Hardy, 332
Heber, Bishop, 340
OTHER WORKS BY Mr. M'CRINDLE.
ANCIENT INDIA
As described by the Classical Authors, being a series of
copiously annotated translations of all the Greek
and Roman texts which relate to India.
L Ancient India as described by Megasthenes and Arrian.
With an Introduction, Notes, and a Map of Ancient
India. Bombay, 1877. 8vo . . .5s. nett.
II. The commerce and navigation of the Erythraean Sea, being
a translation of the Periplus Maris Erythrai, and of
Arrian's account of the voyage of Nearkhos. Bombay,
1879. 8vo . . . . . . • 5s- nett.
III. Ancient India as described by Ktesias the Knidian. Bom-
bay, 1882. 8vo 4s. 6d. nett.
IV. Ancient India as described by Ptolemy. With an Intro-
duction, Map of India according to Ptolemy, and a very
copious Index. Bombay, 1885. 8vo . . 5s. nett
Of the above books few copies remain for sale.
OPINIONS OF THE PRESS.
* «
In rendering the results of Dr. Schwanbeck's industry
accessible to English readers by this translation of the collected frag-
ments of the lost Indika of Megasthenes, perhaps the most trustworthy
of the Greek writers on India, Mr. M'Crindle would have performed
a most valuable service even had he not enriched the original by the
addition of copious critical notes, and a translation of Arrian's work
on the same subject. — The Calcutta Review.
* * * Mr. M'Crindle's translations of the accounts of Ancient India
by Megasthenes and Arrian, is a most valuable contribution to our
knowledge of the subject in the days when Greeks and Romans were
ruling the world. — The Pioneer.
* * * Mr. M'Crindle deserves the thanks of all who take an interest
in Ancient India, and, should he be able to fulfil his promise to translate
"the entire series of classical works relating to India," he will give an
impetus to the study of the early civilisation of this country among
native as well as European scholars. — The Madras Times.
* * * He is to be congratulated on having made a very useful con-
tribution to the popular study of Indian antiquities. — The Westminster
Review.
* * * To those students who have neither the learned work of Dr.
Vincent, nor the Geographi Gncci Minor es of C. M tiller within reach,
this handy volume (Megasthenes) will prove very serviceable. — The
Academy.
* * * The fragments of the Indika of Megasthenes, collected by
Dr. Schwanbeck, with the first part of the Indika of Arrian, the
Periplus Maris Erythnci^ and Arrian's account of the voyage of
Nearkhos, have been translated, in two most useful volumes, by Mr.
J. W. M'Crindle, M.A. The Indika of Ktesias with the fifteenth
book of Strabo is also promised, and the sections referring to India
in Ptolemy's Geography would complete a collection of the highest
value to Indian history. — Note, under the article India, in the new
edition of ^^ The Encyclopicdia Britannica."
* * * The amount of patient and scholarly work which they indicate
is of the kind that we are rather accustomed to look for from a German
savant, and can hardly be properly appreciated by one who does not
know l3y experience the difficulties of such investigations. — The Scottish
Geographical Magazine.
* * * What he has proposed to do has been very carefully worked
out. His notes are of special interest. — Thejotir. R. As. Soc.
* * * Mr. M'Crindle has earned a solid reputation by his learned
research on subjects connected with Ancient India, and his latest pro-
duction, Ancient India as described by Ptolemy, will be appreciated by
scholars and geographers. — 7 he Scotsman.
* * * Mr. M'Crindle, who has translated divers of the old accounts
of Arrian, Megasthenes, and others, now comes forward to give us a
*• succinct account of Ptolemy's geographical system," to show us how
the disguise of places named by that writer can be pierced, and to
push etymological inquiry to somewhat dim and distant limits. He is
entitled to credit for research, diligence, and knowledge of his subject.
— The Saturday Revi^v.
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES QUOTED
431
Hedike, 184
Heitland, 360-1
Hekataios, 89
Hematchandra, 156
Herodotos, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90,
123, 132, 187, 341, 370
Homer, 89, 132, 237, 284
Humboldt, 6
Hunter, Sir W., 89
Hwen Thsiang, 332, 342, 343, 348
Ibn Haukal, 355
Jerome, Saint, 15
Journal Asiatique, 201, 342, 348
Justin, 321-328
Juvenal, 245
Kallisthen^s, 282, 392
Kleitarchos, Clitarchus, 151, 188,
240
Kochly and Rustow, 104
Kosmas Indikopleustes, 187
Kriiger, 134
Ktesias, 3, 84, 186, 252
Lassen, 53, 76, 129, 143, 158, 160,
187, 252, 333, 335, 347, 349, 354,
356, 381
Le Clerc, 359
Levi, Sylvain, 342, 348, 401, 411, 413
Livy, 100, 197, 218
Loewenthal, 337
Lucan, 13, 214
Lucian, 378-9, 392
M'MURDO, Captain, 157, 166, 353,
356
Mahabharata, ill, 116, 155, 156,
333» 35o» 351
Mahavanso, Chronicle of Ceylon, 187,
332, 404
Mann, 156, 190
Marco Polo, 364
Markianos, Marcian, 167, 397
Masson, 61, 142, 156, 331, 349
Maximus Tyrius, 361
Megasthenes, 3, 7, 8, 14, 86, 88, 93,
I55> 187, 190, 341, 358, 361, 364,
386, 412
Mela, Pomponius, 186, 190
Mitford, 48
Moberly, 104, 105
Mockler, Major, 397
Moorcroft, 366
Mliller, C, 194, 343
Nearchos, 165, 186, 188, 244, 341,
361, 391-2
Nikolaos of Damascus, 365, 389
Nonnus, 333
Olshausen, 127
Onesikritos, 7, 157, 187, 217, 307,
309, 361, 390-1
Orosius, 7, 116, 155, 190
Ovid, 186
Panini, 201, 334, 348, 350, 367,
411, 413
Patrokles, 6, 8
Pausanias, 49, 72, 151, 246
Periplous of the Erythraian sea, 59,
no, 116, 161, 186, 188, 252, 310,
367
Peutinger Tables, Geographer of
Ravenna, no
Philo, 190
Philostratos, 193, 215, 344, 349
Pliny, 7, 123, 134, 155, 159, 170,
172, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 190,
217, 220, 231, 241, 253, 262, 263,
331, 339, 341, 343, 345, 348, 351,
364, 365, 380
Plutarch, 305-317 /a jj'/w
Polyainos, 107, 340, 345, 411
Polybios, 21, 100, 184, 187
Porphyrios, 190
Pratt, 196
Pseudo-Kallisthenes, 342, 392
Ptolemy Soter, loi, 102, 128, 134,
148, 150, 179, 392
the Geographer, 58, 59, 61, 114,
129, 155, 165, 167, 183, 184,
188, 194, 245, 293, 326, 338,
343, 347, 365-6
Racine, 235, 383
Rajput Chronicle, ,111, , ,
Ramayana, 349, 363 . ' ,
Rashid-ud-Dii7, 2>^'^ .'••'.
Raven, 218, 230, 237
Rennell, 334^, 31.6', .' : *
Rig-veo'a, 93',. )[86,',37o,'
Ritter, 6*4, 72,' 3*33, 35'6'
Rooke, 360
» • '
• •
432
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES QUOTED
Ross, Major, 357
Royal Asiatic Society, Journal of, 343
Saint Ambrose, 392
Sainte-Croix, 48
Saint-Martin, V. de, 64, in, 116,
156, 157, 158, 159, 323» 333. 339,
349, 350, 35i> 352, 354, 355, 35^,
365, 367
Sallat, 372
Salt, 85
Scaliger, 360
Schmieder, no, 134
Senart, 374
Seneca, 195, 229
Sintenis, 171
Smith, V. A., 371-2
Solinus, 186, 220, 364
Sophokles, 339
Sotion, 309
Stephanos of Byzantium, 57, 129,
139, 186, 194, 262, 331, 351
Stobaeus, 153
Strabo, 6, 7, 39, 57, 95, "o. "2,
n4, 131-2, 133, 134, 157, 160,
161, 168, 185, 186, 187, 188, 190,
217, 219, 282, 339, 341, 347, 351,
358, 361, 365, 369, 3^5, 389, 393,
399
Suidas, 190
Tacitus, 193, 227
Theobald, W., 370-2
Theophrastos, 217
Thirlwall, Bishop, 19-20, 41, 48,
104, 107, 121, 138, 227, 237, 249,
266, 287, 351
Timagenes, 151, 240
Tumour, 187
Tzetzes, 224
Varaha Sanhita, III, 367
Vegetius, 218
Vigne, 78
Vincent, 169, 261, 356
Virgil, 199, 234, 365
Voltaire, 313
Weber, Professor A., 332, 359
Wilford, 365, 367
Willdenow, 171
Williams, Archdeacon, 48
Sir Monier, 156
Wilson, Dr. John, 356
Dr. H. H., 59, 331-2, 335,
336
Wood, Lieut., 78, 157
Xenophon, 86, 364
Yule, Colonel Sir H., 252, 356
Zumpt, 10, II
THE END
* * •
t > - r . T r
Printed by R. & R. Clark, Edinburgh.
t
I
I
fi
i
■
;l
r
1
:i
K-
884. 07
Q
v^
O
CO r^
« 5:
COLUMBIA UNIVERS TY
illlllll
0025977334
WI3
' : ^
' '< .T
\
111. 1 1 bi
\
l>tU «^H3B