MASTER NEGA TIVE NO . 92 -80666 MICROFILMED 1 992 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES/NEW YORK as part of the . t^ • .» "Foundations of Western Civilization Preservation Project Funded by the NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES Reproductions may not be made without permission from Columbia University Library COPYRIGHT STATEMENT The copyright law of the United States -- Title 17, United States Code - concerns the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material... niversity Library reserves the right to refuse to accept a copy order if, in its judgement, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of the copyright law. A UTHOR : SEWALL, J.B. TITLE: GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES PLACE: BOSTON DA TE : 1885 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT BinLIOGRAPHIC MICROFORM TARGET Original Material as Filmed - Existing Bibliographic Record ~n — pnr pi II I . ., W" " ""t P . 1 . iw ng i i i m -w Sowall, J B The Greek conditional ^sentences, by J.B.Sewall Boston, Allyn, 1085. 1^ p- 21 cm, ' ,1 t 382155 If Master Negative # Restrictions on Use: TECHNICAL MICROFORM DATA FILM SIZE: .^>^_/>i/21__ REDUCTION RATIO:__ IMAGE PLACEMENT: lA Ql^ IB IIB DATE FILMED:___S'_-_/_0-f^_ INITIALS G,^_ HLMEDBY: RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS. INC WOODBRIDGE. CT UJL. % ^ ^, r Association for information and image Management 1 1 00 Wayne Avenue. Suite 1 1 00 Silver Spring. Maryland 20910 301/587-8202 Centimeter 1 lilt imlmihmlmn^^ 5 6 iiiliiiiliiiiliiii 8 I I I p#m¥ iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 9 10 iiiliiiililllillllll T 1 1 n 12 iiliiiiliiiiliin 13 14 iiiiliiiiliiiiiiii 15 mm T T 1 T Lim Inches .0 I.I 1.25 1^ 2.8 150 \^ |3.2 >3 71 |M • i£ UIAU 1.4 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 MfiNUFfiCTURED TO RUM STRNDfiRDS BY fiPPLIED IMAGE, INC. * /^9^ / I (- LT;i/ ctmt ariT-qpicrLov, ovk opOCx: iyvioK^v, Dem. IV. 29, — if any one thinks ration- money to be small inducement, he has not rightly learned. Form : In the condition, ct with the indicative ; in the conclusion, the indicative without ar, or any form of expres- sion asserting actual fact, or the imperative. It is a simple supposition regarding fact, without implica- tion one way or the other as to its actuality ; only if it is or is not fact, then // is or is not thus and so. ct PovXevop^eOa rrdXiV avToU 8ta c^tXta? teVat, avdyKT] r)fia^ TToXXijv aOvpiav cx^lv, Anab. III. 28, — if we are deliberating going to them again in friendly fashion, it must be that we are gready discouraged. ci /xcVrot SiavoovfJieda avv rots orrXot? ^lktjv cxt^cirat auTot?, TToXXai rjpxv kol KaXal cXttiSc? cto-t (TiorrjpLaq, Anab. III. 2. 8, — but if we intend to inflict punishment on them with our arms, we have many and fiiir hopes of safety. ct 8c Tt? vpLU}V aOvfiei on, ktA.., IvOvfirjdyjre oti, ktX., Anab. III. 2. 18, — if any one of you is discouraged because, etc., consider that, etc. ct 8c Tis aAAo 6pa I^IXtlov, AcJaToj, Anab. III. 2, 58,— if any one sees anything better, let him speak. CREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. 8 GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. u)S f^paxvs coTt 6 TTas avOpw-mvo*; yStos, ci rovrtov yc coiToji^ Toaovrmy ovSci? €S iKaroaTW €To^ iripUa-Taif Herod. VII. 46, — how short is all human life if no one of tlicse, so many though they are, will survive to the huntlrecllh year. ct Se Tts vfJi<^)V 6v(r7roX.€fJLrjTov oierai tov ^^LKtTnrov chat, opOw^ okrai, Dem. IV. 4, — if any of you thinks Philip to be hard to war with, he thinks rightly. 11. Second Class. Supposition contrar>- to fact. It is implied in both condition and conclusion that the contrary is the truth. ct Tt €Lxovy cSi'Sow av, — if I had anything, I would give it (implied, I have nothing, therefore I shall not give). ct K-aAuJs €7rpa^€y tTnjviOrj ar, — if he had done well, he would have been praised (imphed, he did not do well, therefore was not praised). Form : In the condition, ct with a past tense of the in- dicative ; in the conclusion, a past tense of the indicative with av. The imperfect tense denotes present time, sometimes re- peated or continued action in past time ; the aorist or pluper- fect, past time. With the imjjcrfect tense our English idiom is the same : "if I needed the article, 1 would buy it." " Needed " is in the imperfect tense, but expresses present time, '' needed it now." rffuv y av Tpuraarfifvos ravr* cVot'ci, ct cwpa rjfia^ /xc- v€ii' 7rapa(TK€va^ofi€V(w<;, Anab. III. 2. 24, — he would thrice gladly do this for us, if he saw us preparing to remain, ct fi€VTOL TOTC TrActou^ cTui/cXcyTycrtti^, €KLvSvv€V(T€v av Sta- Oap?jvat iroXv tov cTTpaTci'/xaro^, Anab. IV. I. Ii, — if, 10 GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. 9 howTver. more had been assembled, a large part of the army would have been in danger of being destroyed. cywy' at'Tos cKaAAwo/xr/t' t€ Kat ij(^pvvop.rjv av, ct lyrr.- (TTafjLTjv TttiTa, Plato Apol. 20. C, — I should plume and pride myself upon it, if I understood this. ct TTCpt Kaivov Ttj/o? Trpay/xttTO? TrpovrlOeTo Acycir, »;ori.- X''ai' av rjyoi'y Dem. IV. I, — if it were proposed to speak in relation to some new subject, I should keep cpiiet. ct TOLi'vv 6 fln'AtTTTros TOTC Tai'Ttjv €iT)^€ Trjv yvo')fjiT]v , ov^ikv av uiv injvl 7rc7rot7;Kcv tTrpa^ci', Dem. IV. 5, — if there- fore Phili]) had then held this opinion, he would have done none of the things which he now has done. ct firj wfirjv rj^iLV irapa Oeov^; oAAoi;'?, ySiKovv av ovk dyavaKTu)v tw davdrio, PI. Phaedo, 63. B, — if I did not think that I should come to other gods, I should do wrong in not grieving at death. in. Third Class. Supposition of contingent fact. The fact supposed is dependent upon circumstances or experi- ence, may or may not be true or prove true, is hanging as it were in the balance. idv Tt e^yj SoWct, — if hc has anything, he will give it. (It is uncertain. He may and he may not have any- thing. If it proves that he has, he will give it.) idv TTpd^yj TOiTo, KaAuis c^ct, — if he does [shall have done] this, it will be well. (He may do it, he may not, — we shall see ; if he does, it will be well.) Form : In the condition, idv (dv or yv) with the sub- junctive ; in ^the conclusion, the future indicative, or the imperative, or a form of expression implying the future. 7]V pXv yap xprf^LO-tiiVTaL CTrcor^at, v/xct? SofcTC atTtot cti^at, Anab. I. 4. 15, — for if they vote [may or shall have voted] to follow, you will seem to be the cause. GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. I 1 lO GREEK CONDITIOXAE SENTENCES. TL €crrtti T019 ;9, v7rL(T\i'oi fxai croi ScVa rdXavTa, Anab. I. 7. 18, — if you have spoken the truth [if it proves that you have spoken truly], I promise you [implied future] ten talents. ^i^ 8c Tt? avTiov Tp€\l/y Ta<; yi'w/xa?, 7ro\v cvOvfiorepOL €(TovTaiy Anal). III. I. 41, — if any one diverts their thoughts, they will be in much better sjiirits. TTokv jiikv IdxvpoTipov 7rauro/x€r, 7;i' ti? Trpocri'r;, Anab. III. 2. 19, — we shall strike with much greater force if any one comes near. TU)V TjV KpaT7J(TWfX€l'j OV fl/f Tt5 yjflLV d/VAo? OTpUTO? dvTL- {rrfj KOT€ dv6pu)Tro}Vy Her. VII. 53, — if we conquer these no other army of men will ever withstand us. (Good- win's Gr. § 257; Allen's Hadley, 1032.) dv ravTa TropiarjTe ra xpVf^o.ra^ TravaearO^ act Trepl twv avTuiv ^ov\€v6fi€voi, Dem. IV. ^^, — if you will provide this money, you will cease always deliberating about the same subject. KUV fX-tj I'll' iOikwflCV €K€L TToXc/lCU' aiTW, €v6d^* LCTltX; dvayKao-O-qadfiiOa rovro Trotctv, Dem. IV. 50, — and if we are not willing to war with him there, perhaps we shall be compelled to do it here. €vprj(T€L TO. aaOpd tCov ckciVou irpayfiaTtDV avTo*; 6 iro- Xc/Ao?, dv lTi)^€ipu)fjL€v, Deui. IV. 44, — tlic War itself, if we undertake it, will find out the rotten parts of his affairs. IV. Fourth Class. Supposition of possible fact, or fact conceived only. The fact supposed is merely conceived and presented as existing only in the mind — pure sup- position. €1 Tavra irpda-a-oi, fiiya ryjv ttoXlv dv PXaij/cic, — if he should do this, he would greatly injure the city. 12 GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. I 1 oTkos 8* ai'To?, tl Onyyr)V Ad/3oi, (T(ujitpOVTL^€LV, OVK UV dfX€- XotV ^vtCov, Xen. Mem. I. 4. n, — i^ I could think that the gods had any care for men, I would not be neglect- ful of them. 8. G E N E R A L. TW'O CLASSES. I. First Class. Supposition of general truth or existing customary fiict. The condition suggests to the mind an indefinite number of cases, and the conclusion applies as true to each and every one of the cases which may arise, — is true every time the condition is true. GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. I^ 12 GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. €«»• 8c T19 SuiiKT) TO €T€pov Kul Aa/i./?(ir?;, (r\€^6v TL (iiay- icaf€T(U XafiPdveiv kol to €T€p(n\ Pliacclo, 6o. B, — if OIIC pursues [ever] the one and takes it, he is all but com- pelled [always] to take also the other. *}v iyyi'<; eXOf) ^aiaro?, ovSeU PovX^rai Ov^a-Kuv, Kur. Ale. 671, — if death comes near [at any time or in any case], no one is willing to die. (The truth of the con- clusion is api)]i(:al)le in any and every case.) Form : In the condition, hiv with the subjunctive ; in the conclusion, the indicative present, or any form expressing present, customary, or repeated action. riv Tt TTcpt T7/xas d/uaprai'oxrt, Trcpt tu? mvrwv ipvxa^ Kol TO. aMfiara ufiapTdvovcri, Anal). III. 2. 20, — if they make any mistake in regard to us, they make mistake in regard to their own souls and bodies. Trai^TCS TTora/xoi, *)v koi Trpoao) tu)V mfyoiv airopoi w(n, xpotowt Trpo? Ttt? Trrjyas SuifiaTOt yiyvovTai, Anal:). III. 2. 22, — all rivers, even though they be impassable at a distance from their sources, become passable to those who go to their sources. ot 8ciAot KiVc? TOi'? pikv Trapiorra? Zlmkovo-i t€ SaKvovcni', 7]v 8i'i'aji'Tai, Toi'? 8c 810^01^09 <^ciryouo-ti', Anab. III. 2. 35, — cowardly dogs are wont to pursue and bite passers- by, if they can, but flee from those who pursue them. lav cV Xcppon'7/fja» irvOrjaOi ^iXnnroVj iK€L(T€ porjOiiv j/rryr/n'^ccr^c, Dem. IV. 41, — if you hear of Philip in Cher- sonesus, there you vote to go to the rescue. II. Second Ci^ss. Supposition of general truth or cus- tomary foct in past time. €1 Tis icAcTrrot, cVoAa^cTo, if any one stole [ever], he was punished [always]. ct tk; (ii'TctVoi, €v6vy8ctoi' cVatVcv av (Goodwin, 2o6 ; Hadley, 704, fine i)rint ; Allen's Hadley, 835 a), Anab. II. 3. II, — if any one of those ordered to this duty seemed to him to be shirking, selecting the proper man, he would strike him. ct ^€ KOL 8ta/3atVctv Tti^a 8cot huif^acnv *] yivpav^ ovk cVapaTToi'To, Anab. III. 4. 23, — and if it was necessary to cross any ford or bridge, they were not thrown into disorder. 9. CONDITIONAL RELATIVE SENTENCES. A relative word (pronoun, adjective, or adverb), referring to an indefinite antecedent, has a conditional force. It may then take the place of the conditional particle ct in all the forms of conditional sentences, so that for each of the direct forms there will be a corresponding relative form. There will, therefore, be six classes, — /our particular and two general. 10. CONDITIONAL RELATIVE SENTENCES PARTICULAR, FOUR CLASSES. I. First Class. Supposition relating to actual Hict. oo-Tt5 ToiTo Acyci, a/xapTfU'€t, whoever says this [= if any one says this], he is mistaken. The corresponding GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. IS GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. direct would be, ct rts tovto Xcyct, ajiaprdvu. The rela- tive o^ rc|)laces the particle d. Form: In the condition, the relative word (instead of c?) with the indicative ; in the conclusion, the indicative without Ji', or any form of exi)ression asserting actual fact, or the im- perative. As in the direct first, there is a simi)le supposition regarding flict, without implication one way or the other as to its actuality ; only, if it is or is not fact, then it is or is jwt thus and so. oTTocrot /icv /xao-Tei'ouGTi fJ}^ Ik iravToq rpoTTOv Iv TOi? TToAc/AtKOtS, Ol'TOt KaKwS TC Kflt ala^pUj^ W9 cVt TO TToXv aTTO- 6vi] = €t TU'l). OtTTt? VflOU' TOV<; Ot/CCtOV? €7rL0v/JL€L iScU', flifULVrjaOo) ai'7jp aya^o? etmi, Anab. III. 2. 39, — who of you desires to see his friends at home, let him remember to be a brave man (orrn? = €1 Tts). o'u9 rt€ firf €vpL(TKOVy Ka'OTdtoi' avT()i<; eTroiqcrav ftcya, Kal (TTerfidvov:: cVe'^co-ar, Anal). VI. 4. 9, — and what [dead bodies] they did not find [= if tliere were any they did not find], they made for them a great cenotaph, and placed garlands upon it (ow = ct nvaq). Kal cTTi'iyero orrTt*; reti/ fxyj £Ti'y;^ru'€V i7ri(TTd/JL€V0<;^ Anab. V. 7. 25, — and whoever [if anyone] did not happen to know how to swim was drowned (mm? = ct tl<;). a fii] oTSa ovSe olnp.ni elSa'ai^ Pi. Apol. 21. D., — what I do not know, I do not think I know (a=ct nva). 16 GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. '5 II. Second Class. Supposition of contrary fact. As in the direct conditional of the second class, it is implied in both condition and conclusion that the contrary is the truth. 00-ot ctxov. iStSovv di\ — as many as had would give, i. e. if any had they would give (implied, none have, therefore they do not give). otrot K'aAco? tTrpa^av^ €TnjviOf](Tav ar, — as many as did well would have been praised, i. e. if any had done well, they would have been praised (implied, none did well, therefore none were praised). For?ji : In the condition, the relative word ( instead of ct) with a past tense of the indicative ; in the conclusion, a past tense of the indicative with dv. As in the direct form, the imperfect tense signifies present time, and the aorist or pluperfect past time. ot 8c TratSe? vp.Co]\ ocrot /xci' ivOdSe yjcravj inro tovtwv av vfipL^ovTo, Lys. XII. 98, — your children who were here would be maltreated by them (oo-ot = ct riveq). 0VT€ yap av avTOL e7r€)(€LpovfjL€v Trpdrretv a p.7j i-yTrioTa- fl€Uaj OVT€ TOt? tlAA-Ot? €7r€Tp€7rO/X€Vf WV 7]p\nfl€l'y ttAAo Tl TrpdrrtLV r; o tl irpdrTovTeq opOutq c/xcAXoi/ Trpd^iiv ' tovto 8* tJv' av, ov c7rtoT7//x?;i' €t;^oi', PI. Charm. 1 7 1. E., — for nei- ther should we ourselves undertake to do what we did not know how to do, nor should we allow others whom we were ruling to do anything else than what, if doing, they were going to do rightly : and this would be what they had knowledge of. a = ct rtm, wv = ct Ttvtor, ov = ct Ttl'09. III. Third Class. — Supposition of contingent fact. As in the direct, the fact supposed is dependent upon circum- stances or experience ; may or may not prove true. Form : In the condition, the relative word with dv with GREEK CONDITIONAL SExNTENCES. 17 i6 GREEK COXDITTONAL SENTENCES. the subjiinctiv^e ; in the conclusion, the future indicative, or a form of ex[)ression implying the future. As in the direct form ei is com[)oun(led with ar, forming idv, avt or rjVj SO here the relative word, when i)ossible, is compounded with uv. Thus or€ Ji' becomes orai', eVctSi; av becomes cVctSup, and cttci av becomes cVryi'. Otherwise, dv stands immediately after tlie relative wonl, as os dv, oo-tl^ dv, oaoL av, etc. Tw dy^pl ov uv iXrjrrOc TrftVo/xat, Anab. I. 3. 15, — I will obey the man whom you shall have chosen (f>v dv = idv TLva) ; or, whatever man you may choose, I will obey him. iTTctSav Ta;(toTa y (TTparein Xy]irjj €v6v<; dTrmri/Juf/tn (T€, Anab. III. 1.9, — just as soon as the expedition is ended, I will send you back (iTretSdv = idv Trore). irreL^dv 8e ^taTrpdiioiJML a Se'o/tat, >/^o), Anab. II. 3. 29, — when I have effected what I desire, I will come (c7ra8av= idv ttotc). TToAv Se iJ.dWnv orov *tv /?oi'Xoj/X€^a rcv^ofieOay Anab. III. 2. 19, — we shall hit much more certainly what- ever we wish (oTou dv = idv tlvo^). avTov TTJSc ficv^nfJLev Ictt dv kol rcXctTT/froyxcr, Her. VII. 141, — we will remain here until we die (eVr dv = idv TTore). IV. Fourth Class. — Supposition of possible fact, or fact as conceived merely. jFonn : In the condition, the relative word wnth the opta- tive ; in the conclusion, the optative with dv. cyoj yap okvqltjv dv ct? ra TrXola ifi/3aLV€LV a rffxiv 8007, Anab. I. 3. 17, — I should hesitate to embark on the vessels which he w^ould give us (u = €r nm). i/\o? (iaTi) w ai^ t/>iXo? tJ, Anal). I. 3. 12, — the man is a valuable friend to whomsoever he is a friend ; /. c. if he ever becomes a friend to any one, he is [always] a valuable friend (w dv = idv TLVi) . €aj? ai' ^ouru' €vSaifxovi(TT€pov Stdyovras toi'tovs opui, Anab. III. i. 43^—^'^^ ^o"g ^^ they live I see them living in greater happiness (ews a»'= idv nva xpov^^')- oTrJrcpot dv avv rot? ^cot? rats ij/vxaU ippoifievia-repoi LiiXTiV cVt Tovq TToXc/xtoi;?, toi'tov9 a>9 cVi TO TToXv ot dvTLOl ov SixovTat, Anal). III. I. 42, —whichever [of two parties at war with each other] with more resolute spirit GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. 19 i8 GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. with the help of the gods fall upon their enemies, these generally those in the opposite ranks do not wait to receive (oruVcpoi ai'=:iav crepot). yfjidq 8c Set tovto o tl av SoktJ tois ^cot? Trdax^tv, Anab. III. 2. 6, — it is necessary for us to suffer that which may seem good to the gods (o tl av = idv tl). OLTrep LKavoL cio-t oroS^cii' cuTrcxto?, orai^ ^orAwrrat, Anab, III. 2. 10, — [the gods] who are able to save [men] easily whenever they wish (orai/ = idv ttotc). ot Se dv^pi^ ilo-lv ot TTOioirrc? o ti uv iv rai? /Aa^atS ytyvr/rat, Anab. III. 2. i8, — the men are they who do whatever is done in batde (o n av = edv tl). oTav airor? 8to'»Kw/x,cv, iroXv oi'X otoV T€ (ecrri) x^P^^v airo Tou o-TpaTei'/i,aT05 StwKca', Anab. III. 3. 15, — whenever we pursue them, it is not possible to pursue a great distance from the army. oTav fJikv yap vtt €vvoLa<; to. irpdypaTa orv(Trrj kol -rraa-L ravTo. (Tviiiprj rots /Li€T€;(ovcrt Toi) iroXepiw, Kal (Tvp,Trov€7v Kal €p€LV TCt? (TVp.(f>Opa'^ KOL piviLV lOiXoVdlV dvOplDTTOL, Dem. Olyn. 2. 9, — for whenever a power is held together by good will, and is alike advantageous to all who share in war, men are willing to toil and bear mis- fortunes and wait. a; TOL "AxaLOL TrpujTLcrTu) ^i^opcv^ €vt av irTokLcOpov €/\cu/x€i', II. II. 228, — which we Achaeans give to thee the very first whenever we take a city {€vt av = Attic OTav = idv ttotc). IT. Second Class. — Supposition of general truth or cus- tomary fact in past time. Form ; In the condition, the relative word with the opta- tive ; in the conclusion, the imi)erfect indicative without dv, or a form implying repetition in past time. GREEK CONDITIONAL SENTENCES. 19 TOI 8* au To)V a-Tpanuyruiv ottotc iv6vp.0Lpr}Vj tu? o-7rov8as fidXXov l(f>nl3ovpr]v */ viv tov ttoAc/xov, Anal). III. I. 20, — whenever I considered the circumstances of the soldiers, I feared truce more than war (ottotc :=ct7roTc). ot he oAXot TTaptt tus Ta^ct? ioVtc?, ottov (rTpaTr]yo;vc9, too-ovtov ttulXlv cVaia- Xwpcli/ /xaxo/xcVous c8ct. Anal). III. 3. 10, — as far as the Greeks pursued, so far was it necessary to make their way back again fighting (ottoo-ov = ct ttoo-o^). OTT?; €LT] (TTivbv x^'^P^^^ irpoKaTa\apPdvovT€% iKioXvov tus 7rapo8oi;9, Anab. IV. 2. 24, —wherever there was a nar- row place, seizing it beforehand they tried to hinder the passage (oTnj = ct nij). OTTOTC p.kv ovv Tovq TTptoTovs kidXvolcv, 'B€VO(j>u)V ottlgOiv CK^atVtoi/ 7Tpo5 Ta 6p-q lXv€ ttjv dTTO If w ciiiK-isn withoiif hi'iiiL' (h'licient in matorial for drill. 3. It C031ST0CK'S FIRST LATIN BOOK. A First Latin Book, designed as a Manual of Proc^rt'ssive Exercises and Systematic Drill in the Elements of Latin, and Introiluctory to C'x'sar's Conuuentaries on the Gallic War. By I). Y. Comskx k, M. A., Instruc- tor in Latin, Phillii>a Academy, Andover, Mass. 12mo, half leather. 310 pages. §1.00. The design of this book is to furnish a Manual, complete in itself, which shall give a thorough preparation for the intelligent study of Casar's Gallic War. It contains • I. A Brief Review of English Grammar ; II. The Elementary I'rineiples and Definitions of Latin Accidence; III. The Latin Lessons, with exercises for translation, notes, and test questions ; IV. The Note.-, ^Mving a concise but complete outlme of all essential princi- ples of Latin Syntax ; V. An Appendix of all the necessary forms of inflection ; VL Latin-English and English-Latin Vocabularies. It is heartily commended by the many teachers who are using it as superior to all other books of the same class, in the vital points of fulness and accuracy, of clearness and concise- ness, of judicious gradation and arrangement, and of absolute completeness. John S. White, LL.D., Head-. If aster Berkeley Sclwol, New York C'dij.^ Comstook's Latin Book 1 Had the best book for its j)ur[»<.st- that 1 havi- wer iised. Thf review of English Grammar at the beginning ; the separation of the vocabu- laries from the exercises ; judieinus and progressive presentation of the various uses of the verb in the different iix.tHls , anil the condensed exhibit of the gram- mar, — are such valnable features gathered withm the covers of a text-book, that it has iiu rival. C. S. MooKE, Principal flif/Ji Miaol, Tniintm, J/as5. — Ilaviiig compared the book with several other elemeiitarv Latin books, I have come to the conclusion that Comstock's is the best one for our use. My reasons for preferring it are as Tm\ri?i>'tt IT T A 1^ —Hi^^rkirc t .^rr follows: 1. It is complete, rerpiiring no grammar for those wlio take I^tin for a short time. *2. It is ctmcise without being deficient in material for drill. 3. It is judicious both in tli«' arrangement of vocabularies, notes, &c., and also in the gradation of matter. 4. The " Lsst-ntials of Grammar" and the *' Notes on .'syn- tax" give, in about liO pages, a very useful and conveniently arranged summary of all that the ordinary pupil needs to know. 5. The brief synopsis of English Grammar gives an opportunity (much needed) to review tlie fundamentals of Eng- lish Grammar, and compare and contrast them with those of Latin (Grammar. I tind no other book that combines these advantages. Nathan Thdau-son, A.M., Priiicij»il Lawrence Academy, proton. Mass, — It is altogether the best Latin l)ook for beginners with wliieh I am accpiainted. Professor 11. W. JnnNsT(»N, Illinois College, Jacksonville, Jllinois. — It seems to me superior to any l)ook of tiie kind hitherto published, and I regard the Essen- tials of Latin Grammar as the best statement possible of what a boy must learn in his first 3'ear. Professor John L. CoorEU, Vamleihilt Pre/Kiratory School, Nashvillef Tenn. — With reference to the book, I can speak only in the highest terms. Indeed, I do not think that there has ever been issued an Elementary Latin Exercise Hook that can compare with it in any resix>ct. I say this advisedly, as I have examined almost all issued in this country, and the most prominent English ones; anti, with- out hesitation, I pronounce Mr. Omistock's the l)est book of its kind publislitMl. Professor n. C. MissiMEK, Ilifjh School, Erie, Pa. — \i is very eaecause it is better. Professor R. F. Penxell, IIead-}fa.iiv I^n^'inc till' t it li>tin(i"»i lo n l>r>fiiif ifiil f-ir.-ciinilo nf '.i iMnrit i\i HOMER'S ILIAD. -BOOKS I -VI. With an IntriMliietion ami Notes by R«)hi:kt I*. Kekp, Ph. 1)., Williston Seminary, Easthaiiipton, Mass. I'lnw, ch)tli. 364 pages. $1.60. In this edition much labor has been bestowed upon the introductory matter, which constitutes a distinctive feature of the book. It contains an Essay upon tlie Origin, History, and Transmission of the Homeric Toems, giving in the form of a connected narrative full ex[danation in regard to the Homeric question ; an Essay on Scanning, which presents the subject in a simple, untechnical way, and illustrates the Homeric verso by the aid of English hexameters ; and a concise yet complete Sketch of the Homeric Dialect. The Notes have lieen made quite full, and aim to supply that col- lateral information so nmch needed in the study of Homer. References are made to the Greek Grammars of Iladley (Allen's new edition) and Goodwin. A very attractive feature of the book is a perfect fac-siraile of a page of the famous Venetian Manuscript of tlie Iliad, — the best manuscript of Homer and one of the finest of all existing manuscripts. No pains have been spared to make this the best-equipped and the most useful edition of the Iliad which can be put into the hands of a pupil, and it is almost universally accepted, not only as the best school-edition in the English language of any part of Homer, but also as a text book of altogether exceptional merit. Professor J. H. Wia.iirr. Dartmi>uth Colletje. —It possesses many features that place it far Ix-yoiid all its competitors. W. C. CoLLAK, rhad-.) faster Roxbunj Latin School, Boston.— U is certainly one of the !iiost heautifi.i, as well as one of the most useful, of school-hooks; in fact, I (ion't know what euuld be better suite-l to the n.-e.ls of a i-tudent beginning Greek. Professor B. L. Cilley, rhUlips Exeter Academy, Exeter, N. //. — When mv next class take the lUad I shall certainly use your new edition. It is just the thing for them. The Nation, N. Y. — U is seldom that we fed called upon to express un- qualified approbation of a text-book for schools; but Mr. Itobert P. Keep's editioi 3 < of the Iliad of Homer, Hooks I. -VI., leaves so little room for fault-finding that w« shall not attempt any. Facing the titlepage is a bcautifid fac-sinnio of a page ol the Codex Venetus A (13 x 10 inches), the most important MS. of the Iliad. The introduction gives a very good snnnnary of the results of investigations of modern scholars as to the origin and mode of transmission of the Homeric Poems ; and, though necessaril}' brief, it will yet inform the student of what many (juite recent text-books of the Iliad do not, that there is such a thing as "the Ilonierie (pics- tion," and impart some idea of its natiin- and the difi'erent answi-rs which have been g'ven to it. The .sections »>u the structure and scansion of Homeric verse, on the dialect of Homer, and the commentary generally, show a nit e appreciation of what a student needs and ought to liavf. Altogether the tiook is very handsome »nd very scholarly, antl we have no doubt will j)rove very useful. (October 18, 1883.) Professor jAcon (\tori-:i:, Riityivs Ci>lU'iT 4 ^T SELECTIONS FEOM LUCIAN. With Introductions and Notes by Charles R. Williams, A.M., Professor of the Greek Language and Literature in Lake Forest University ICmo. ;340 pages. §1.40. The general Introduction has been made long and full, from a belief that the student's interest and enthusiasm in an author are quickened by a knowledge of his jiersonal and literary history, and by an acquaintance with the conditions un<. iitial for the >tu.lint to know respecting the author of the dialogues and respecting the dialoicues themselves ; while tlu- notes show a most judicious choice between the extremes of too great fuhios an.l barrenness of illustration. The typograj.Iiy and external appearance are unexcei.tionable." — Firf. Henry M. Bnird, Univtrsity of the CHy oj NtwYork. '' The book is very wi-ll edited, and admirablv gotten up as arc all of your recent publications. It tills a gap, certainly, in tliJ list of serviceable text-books, and I hope to put it to a practical test before long." — Prof. //. Pernn, Wtstem Reserve College^ Ohio. JOHN AILTN, Pnbllsher, 30, Franklin Street, Boston. Alu II Alc Giu:i:c 1 AND THE EAST BY riiK RiciiT IIox. W. K. (a.ADSTOXK. M.V., ■UKSlliKM cF niK ^K'TION H'lt AUCHAIC «;UKKtK AN1> JUK KAST. ARCHAIC GREECE AND THE EAST. However indulgent may be the audience that I have the honour to address, some apology is unquestionably necessary for the association of my name with the work of an Oriental Congress. Ignorant of the languages of the East, I am not cognizant of its races, manners, and institutions, except at a period which must still be termed pre-historic, although some important parts of what belongs to it have, during the present century, gradually acquired the solidity of history. That, however, was the period when, from a central point in Asia, population radiated towards most, if not all, points of the com- pass : under a kindred impulsion, but with incidents and destinies infinitely various. The oldest civilizations tolerably known to us are those which appear to have sprung up with a marvel- lous rapidity in the Babylonian plain and in the valley of the Nile. With one or both of these was minis- terially associated a navigating and building race, which touched the Persian Gulf eastwards and the Mediterranean westwards, and probably kept open and active the line of traffic and passage between B 2 the two. Through this race seems to have been distributed over the coasts of the great inhmd sea, and beyond them, a knowledge of the arts. It was this wealth of the East, which was thus gradually and irregularly imparted, to relieve the poverty and develop the social life of the West. The receptivity, so to speak, of the different countries and races lying within the circle of these visits would appear to have been extremely diversified, and the traces of the process are, for the most part, fragmentary and casual. In one case, and in one only, there is cast upon it tlie liglit of a literary record. Of all that was said or sung on the shores of the Mediterranean in those shadowy times, nothing great or weighty has survived, with the solitary, but inestimable and splendid exceptions of the two works known as the Poems of Homer. They alone (to use the lan- guage of a great modern orator) have had buoy- ancy enough to float upon the sea of time. In them we see the life of those times, such as it was actually lived. We see it as we see in some great exhibition what is termed going machinery. They exhibit to us, as their central object, in the forma- tion stage of its existence, the nation which then inhabited the Greek Peninsula, together with im- portant, though isolated or subordinate, traits of other races and lands. We have then liefore us the following group of 3 facts : — First, there is a great treasure of social art and knowledge accumulated, perhaps for the first time, by human labour in the East. Secondly, we have a seafaring people on the Syrian coast, filled with the vivid energy of commerce, who left in different shapes on every accessible shore the marks of im- ported arts. Next we have obtained, during the present century, a large access of independent knowledge, which exhibits to us the particulars of these Eastern civilizations in their original seats, and which, as we shall see, has found its counterpart or echo in some recent researches of Western archae- ology. To this we have to add, from the Poems of Homer, a delineation of what may ftiirly be called contemporary life, which is so copious as to apparently exhaust the whole circle of the simple experience of those times, and to be indeed encyclopaedic. It may seem, then, that we possess in the poems rare and unrivalled means of interpreting the voice- less treasures supplied from the various sister sources, and of estimating now, somewhat less imperfectly than heretofore, the aggregate of the original debt, which Europe and the West owe to Asia and the East. And here I reach the point at which, if anywhere, I may find an apology for my intervention in the proceedings of an Oriental Congress. For w^hat I may fairly term a long and patient, though necessarily often intermitted, study of the text of Homer may B 2 possibly enable me to offer a small and exotic con- tribution to the great and many-sided purpose of the present distinguished assembly. In approaching my immediate subject, I have no other concern with the long and, in tlie main, unprofitable group of controversies, known as tlie Homeric question, than this — that I have to treat the Poems as an integral mass of contemporary testimony to the life, experience, and institutions of a particular age and people ; to which they add otlier collateral illustrations. Whatever speculators may have fancied as to their origin and authorship, the general rule has been to treat their contents as an unity for practical purposes. Whether the aim has been to describe the Zeus or the Hermes of Homer, or the ship, or the house of Homer, the voice of the Poems has been accepted as one authentic voice. The chief exception to that rule has been made in the case of the glimpses of other religions supplied by the Odyssey ; glimpses which, in my firm opinion, do not impair, l)ut illustrate and confirm belief in that unity of mind which has governed the composition of tlie Poems. But this is a point on which it is unnecessary to dwell. In considering the contributions of the East to the life and manners of the Achaians — for that is the designation most properly attaching to the Homeric forefathers of the Greek nation — I shall not becin ( ■ with religion. We are not now inquiring what elements of religion were carried westwards by those who progressively migrated from the central seat in Asia ; l)ut what aggregate of all arts and knowledge, after the first peopling of the Greek Peninsula, was imparted to its inhabitants and their neighbours from the stores of those Eastern civilizations wdiich had been developed during the intervening ages, and through the medium generally of the Pha-nicians ; that is to say, of that navigating race, who were, to all appearance, the exclusive intermediaries of inter- course by sea between Asia and Europe. It is recognized as a certainty that this people formed the maritime arm of the great Egyptian Empire. But commerce is comprehensive in its sym- pathies, and disposes men rather to profit as neutrals by the quarrels of other people than to share in them as parties ; so a people like the Phoenicians would, in the natural course of things, and regardless of partisanships, be carriers from Babylon and Assyria, or from any region with which they traded, as well as from Egypt, with which they had a distinct political relation. But now is the time to make an observation of vital importance with regard to the comprehensive meaning that attaches in Homer to the Phamician name. Whether the Achaian Greeks themselves devised that name to describe a set of strangers who frequented their coasts, we have no means of know- iiig. It derives, however, no support or illustration from the Pentateuch, or (as I believe) from the monuments. But for Homer it seems to cover every- thing found in the Achaian Peninsula that was of foreign origin. Not that the poet is fond of tracing the particulars of arts and manners to their Eastern sources. The intense sentiment of nationality, which led some Greek states of later davs to covet the title of Antoehthons, was most of all intense in liim ; and it is, for the most part, by undesigned coincidences alone, and l)y the careful co-ordination of particulars sometimes brought together from afiir, that we are able to make out the large catalogue of Achaian obligations to the East. But w^hether the question be of persons settling in the peninsula, or of things brought by or learned through maritime visitors who came from the south-eastern corner of the Mediter- ranean, all of these apparently had but one vehicle, and that vehicle was the Phoenician ship. Con- sequently all came to carry the Phoenician name, or to run up into Phoenician association, for the contemporary Achaian. Much as to the Turk of later days every European was a Frank, so to the Achaians of Homer all persons and things reaching them over sea were bound up with this Phoenician name. The designation accordingly covers not only the bold mariners of the time, but everything for which they w^ere the purveyors, or supplied the vehicle ; in a word, all .Syrian, Assyrian, Egyptian, and generally all Eastern meanings. What it indi- cates'^is a channel ; and all that came through that channel is eml)raced by it. This extended use of the term would appear then to have a more consistent basis than that which I have quoted as a parallel usage. Europeans were all Franks in Turkey by a metonymy which gave the designation of the majority to the whole. Egyptians or Egyptian subjects were reckoned as Phoenicians (oti/tfcc9), because, all reaching the Achaians in Phoenician ships and Phoenician company, they presented in this particular a real unity of aspect. Taken in this pervading sense, the first Phoenician gift to the Greek Peninsula would appear to have been one connected with civil institutions. We obtain a view of it through the remarkable phrase Ajioj: andron. Nothing can be simpler than the meaning of the two words. They signify not king of men, but lord of men ; the word ancuv designating a class and not an office. The phrase is most commonly applied by Homer to Agamemnon. But it is also used for five other persons, and with indications which, though far from complete, are abundantly sufficient to show that it is not a merely ornamental invention of the poet, but a note attaching strictly to particular persons in virtue of some common quality or attri- bute. It is not royal, and does not indicate supremacy, for the word anax is wholly distinct 8 from basUeus (a king), and only indicates in Homer, as applied to men, the higher class of men, or some notable member of that class. It is heritable, for it is given both to Aineias and his father Anchises. It does not go with powerful and marked individualities ; for Agamemnon is only, as a cJiaracter, one of the second class among the oreat chieftains, and all the others are lower in Homeric rank It is not national, for it is enjoyed by Trojan princes. It is ancient ; we find it borne by Augeias two full generations at least before the Trojan War. ^ Agamemnon was the fourth ' ruler in his family since, apparently under Pelops, it first became connected with Greece; while the Dardanian line, in which we find it, was tlie senior of the two royal branches in Troas, and is carried upwards from the time of the War through six generations. Shall we suppose the Anax andron to have been the Governor or Satrap, sent over sea from Egypt at the climax of its power when it ruled the Greek Peninsula and the neighbouring regions at a period preceding, by an interval we cannot yet define, the age of the Trojan War ? We should thus find an explanation consistent with all the facts for a phrase whicli certainly requires an explanation, and which otherwise cries out for it in vain. This phrase supplies us with the oldest his- toric note of settled and regular government in ' II. ii. 104-8. Greece. Not only because we find it associated with kingship, but because we find organised, under Augeias who had borne it, the peaceful institution of the Games,' which we know to have attracted bards as well as horses from neighbouring districts. As we have no trace of any struggle connected with the Egyptian invasion, it may be that the foreif^n rule, loose in its character, after the manner of Asiatic rule, was easily established over a popula- tion living by agriculture, and dwelling village-wise {komedon) ; and that, under the larger organizations thus created l)y degrees, may first have grown that consciousness of strength, and that capacity of pro- gress, which led, after a time, even to national reaction against the foreigner. This reaction took the various forms of the Theban and the Trojan wars, of the Colchian expedition, and probal)ly also of an Achaian share in tlie now historically known eoml)ination of eman- cipated or struggling neighbour States against Egypt in the time of Merephthah. This remark, however, requires something of detailed exposi- tion. It is not from Homer himself that we are to expect any willing indication of the pre- valence at a former time in his already glorious country of a foreign rule. Yet we are not wholly without evidence from extraneous sources of a con- nexion between the title of Anax andron and the ^ II. xi. 698, sqq. 10 great Egyptian Empire. For example, we learn from the Egyptian monuments that in the fourth year of Eameses II., at the close of the 15th century B.C., the Dardanians of Troas fought as allies in the armies of Egypt under Maurnout, King of the Hittites, and that after a series of years they returned to tlieir own country. Nothing could be more natural than that, in virtue of this political connexion, the ruling Dardanian line, which pre- served its separate existence down to the period of the Trojan War, should be invested with an Egyptian title. In the case of the Pelopids, we find ourselves pro- vided, by the discoveries of Schliemann at Mycense, with evidence of a different class, but tendinir with the highest degree of likelihood to the same result. In the Agora at Mycenae, Dr. Schliemann discovered four tombs \ of which Mr. New^ton said that we must rest content with the " reasonable presumption " that they contained Royal personages ; and as to which I believe that no one now disputes their belonging to the heroic and prehistoric age. If so, they surely also belonged to the house which durincr that ac^e ruled in Mycenas— namely, the house of Pelops. In a preface to Dr. Schliemann's ' volume on his discoveries there, I have set forth a numl)er of con- siderations connected with the Poems, which there is 1 Mycenae, Preface, p. xxvii. ^ pp. xxiv. xxviii. seq. 11 not time to notice here, but which tend towards the conclusion that one of these tombs may contain the remains of an historical Agamemnon himself. But it is enough for my present purpose to observe that the title of Anax andron w^as descendilile from father to son, and that it is accorded in the poems to personages altogether secondary — viz., Eumelos, II. xxiii. 288, 354, and Euphetes, xv. 352; who is nowhere else mentioned by Homer— in all likelihood on this especial ground. We must, therefore, suppose it probably to have been inherited by Agamemnon ; and there is no counter evidence to impair the reasonable conclusion that the sovereigns buried in these tombs belonged to a line having the title of Anax andron. But, on the other hand, these sepulchres offer us numerous and clear notes of connexion with the usages of the Egyptian Empire. Among these are the presence in one of the sepulchres of the scales for weijxhinor the actions of the deceased, which recall the Book of the Dead ; the use of gold leaf, which was found as it had been laid over the countenances now long decayed ; the position of five bodies stretched in a long but narrow tomb, not along but across it, with inconvenient compression from lack of space, but in the direction of east and w^est,^ and facing w^estwards according to the usage of Egyptian burial. Such, in fact, is the strength of ^ Mycelial p. 295. 12 Egyptian association as to these tombs, and other- wise established by the Mycenian remains, as to leave little room for reasonal)le doubt on its existence. And thus we have tlie title of A72ax andron once more placed in relation with Egypt, since it clearly subsisted in tlic Pelopid line, and since individuals of that line were in all likelihood the occupants of Mycenian sepulchres. The title itself is of so marked a character that we are led to connect the assumption of it with some great event, and such an event would undoubtedly be the first mission of Pelops, or the first head of the Pelopid house, to bear rule on behalf of Egypt in tlie Greek Peninsula. If these conjectures be correct, and if an Eastern Empire imparted in various quarters of the North and AVcst the first germ of a civil society extending beyond the scale of the village community, it is matter of extreme interest to note tlie differences of mode and of result with which the gift was received l)y diflbrent races and regions. If we judge by the length of the genealogies in Homer, Troas was the seat of States older than any in the Achaian Penin- sula, those, namely, of Ilion and Dardania. It is in Dardania only, the older of the two, that we find the Ana,x andron. And it is true tliat we have no de- taded account of Dardanian manners and institutions. We have, however, this detail in the case of Troy, and we liave no reason to assume a sul)stantial difference between them. But as between Trojan and 13 Achaian, in the political department, we find marked differences all along the line. The Trojan State has indeed a King and an Asseml)ly, but they do not present so much as the beginnings of free speech, of real deliberation, or of national life. The bribes of Paris appear to supply the main motive power. All is coloured with an Asiatic hue. And so among the Phaiahes, where the colour of the description is not Hellenic but Phoenician. A recent American com- mentator^ remarks on the al)soluteness of Alcinous in his kingship, there being assemblies, but no debate ; only immediate acquiescence in the views of the King. But in the Achaian communities, whether at peace, as in Ithaca, or in the camp before Troy, we recognize the elements of the grand con- ceptions I have named. They may not indeed be fully and consistently developed, but they are visible everywhere in their outline, and they reach even up to the point where we find that the will of the supreme chieftain is liable to be checked in a regular manner by other judgments ; liable, we may almost say, to be out-voted. So that when, at nearly the lowest point in the fluctuating fortunes of the army, Agamemnon lias proposed to abandon the expedition, he is resolutely resisted in debate by Diomed, and the general feeling of the soldiery compels him to give way. ^ 1 Merriam, Phoonician Episode, on Od. vii. 2. - II. ix. 40, 8cq. 14 Here we have exhibited in a particular case the essential character of the Achaian receptivity. What the East had the foculty of conceiving, but not of developing, the more elastic and vigorous nature of the Achaian Greek took over as an imparted gift, and then by its own formative genius opened out, enlarged, and consolidated in the form and with the effect of an original endowment. I shall pre- sently endeavour to unfold this proposition in a diversity of particulars. It will naturally be asked if the Egyptian Empire left upon once subject lands a trace of departed authority in the title Anax andrdn, did it not impress on the traditions of the Achaian race any note of its own conception of kingship, and of the remarkable connection which it had established between royalty and divinity ? The oldest dynasty given by Manetho is said to have been of the gods and demigods. The list of Egyptian kings on the Turin papyrus begins with a line of deities, the last of whom is Horus.* The divine name Ra, incorporated in the names of kings, carries downward into historic time the memory of this belief ; and it is not surprsing that we should find a pretty distinct trace of the same belief in the Homeric Poems. I refer to his use of the two phrases Diotrephes, Zeus-nurtured, and Diogenes, Zeus-born. The first of these is applied to the race of the Phaiahes, with the distinct ^ Rawlinson, Herod, ii. 337 . 15 intention of representing them as of the kin- dred of the gods ; ^ and in the Iliad we have it used to signify the kings of cities as a class.^ It is nowhere otherwise employed except in a line ^ where it has been allowed to supplant an old and I believe legitimate reading, and where it is little better than senseless. Once, in the singular, it is applied caressingly by Achilles to his instructor, Phoinix.* But it may be stated generally that both words are confined in Homer to Royal personages with a remarkable strictness ; and, as if further to impress on them the characters of titles, the favourite usage of them is in the vocative. Conformably with the sense of these remarkable epithets, the ances- tries of the Homeric Kings often run up to Zeus ; sometimes to Poseidon, and this probably in his character as a god supreme in his own proper regions and mythologies. It seems easy here to perceive a real connexion with the Egyptian idea and practice. But again, we have to notice that the transplanta- tion into Achaian Greece of the Asiatic or Egyptian notion did not imply continuing confinement within its bounds. The poet availed himself of the vener- able character thus accorded to the bearers of civil authority, the basis of which he always regards as divine ; but this did not lead him into the region of despotic ideas. Nothing can be less like the Eastern despot than an Achaian King, who has to rely upon 1 Od. V. 278. 2 II. ii. 60. 3 II, iv. 480. * II. ix. 603. 16 reason, upon free speech, upon the assembly, as prin- cipal governing forces ; and who seems to supply an historic basis for the succinct but very remarkable description given by Thucydides of the early Greek rulers as kings upon stipulated conditions/ But before proceeding to details, I will describe certain impressions, strictly relevant to the present subject, wliich have resulted from my long study of the poems, and which, if they be correct, would prove that Homer himself had an enerojetic and also a methodical conception of the obligations of his country to the East. It is, I believe, generally admitted that in Achilles, the protagonist of the Iliad, we have a superb projection of the strictly Hellenic character, mag^nified in its dimensions to the utmost point consistent with the laws of poetical probability. In the epithet Hellenic is conveyed that wonderful receptivity which first accejDted and then transmuted the Eastern rudiments of civilization. But, by the side of this Hellenic form of character, there is another at once its sister, its rival, and its complement ; and, as the Iliad is the triumphal procession of the one, so the Odyssey is the deathless monument of the other. It is remarkable that the poet has placed these two, different as they are, in relations of close sympathy and attachment, so that they never clash ; while, of the two next Achaian heroes, Diomed has no point of personal contact with 1 Thuc. i. 13. Acliilles (offering, indeed, to carry on tlie war witli- out him), and Ajax l)ecomes involved in a deadly feud with Odysseus. The distinctness of the two ixreat dominatino: characters enables them to fit into, to integrate one another, and jointly to ex- press the entire mental and moral aggregate of the race. There was indeed a third ethnical in- gredient, the Pelasgian, which perhaiDS had to bide its time for its own proper development. For the Homeric and heroic picture, Achilles and Odysseus between them expressed all that was great, signal, and formative in Achaianism. We may perhaps sum up the greatness of Achilles in this, that he ex- pressed a colossal humanity. What was it that he did not express ? He did not express, and Odysseus did, the many-sided, the all-accomplished, the all- enduring man : the jiolutropos, the polumetis^ the tlemon, the poluttls, the 2)olumekano>^y the poikilo- meth, the poluphron^ the ddiphron, the talasiphron — in whom this is perhaps above all remarkal)le, that the completeness of his structure, the firmness of his tissue, raised his passive even up to the level of his active qualities. Let us look a little round the circumference of the man. In battle he is never foiled. In counsel he is supreme. His oratory is like the snow flakes of the winter storm. Victor in the severe strength- contests of the Twenty-third Iliad, he conquers also among the Phaiakes in their game of skill. This is e 18 a specimen only ; iuid he tells them he is no bad hand at any of the athletics practised among men.^ He is the incomparal)le bowman, who performs a feat otherwise l)eyond human strength. His is the spirit of boundless patience which enforces sihiicc in the eavit\' of the horse. But tlie ranj^e of his accomplishments also includes every manual art. In the island of Oalfipso lie appears as tlie sln'p carpenter. As the ploughman he can cliallenge a hauglity suitor to compete witli him in harvesting corn all day till nightfall without a meal, or in drivini]^ the straio-ht and even furrow with a team of powerful oxen.^ In his own palace, lie l»uilt liis chaml)er after the Phoe- nician manner, tliat is, with great hewn stones.^ It was reared over a full-grown olive tree, which he cut at a proper height, and then shaped the stump into his nuptial bed. Into this he wrought inlaying of gold, of silver, and of ivory, and this opera- tion supplies the sole instance in which not merely any Achaian chieftain, l)ut any Acliaian whatever is found in the Poems to execute a work of art. That it is such is undenialjle, for lie applies to it the very term dmrJalkm^ from Daidalos, whose name may be said to give the summit level of art for those days. Even tlie bed-covering expresses the same idea of foreign art, for it is dyed witli purple (phoiniki) which carries the Phoenician name.* Alone amono- the 1 Od. viii. 190, 214. 3 01. xxiii. 192. 2 Od. xviii. 365-75. * Od. xxiii. 188-201. 19 Achaian Greeks, he elevates his manual labour into the region of genuine art ; as he was idso alone among them in presenting to us the character of a daring navigator prepared to face distant voyages with the extremes of climate and adventure. I have endeavoured elsewhere to show how Ithaca, as well as its head, abounds in the signs of Phoenician association.^ Here I will only observe that if the character of Odysseus has been based by Homer upon Phoenician elements, trained by Hellenic contact and experience into a superior development, and set out in the Poems by the side of the purely Hellenic Achilles, there cannot be a more decisive ex- hiljition of a belief in the mind of Homer that the institutions and arts of life viewed as an aggregate w^ere imported from the East. But, over and above this universality of Odysseus in the arts of life, he bears the Phoenician stamp in what may l)e termed his craft. In the Thirteenth Odyssey, Athene signifies to him pretty plainly * that there can be no use in their endeavouring to impose upon one another, as he is first of all mortals in counsel and in figments, while she has a corresponding precedence among the Immortals. In general, a high prudence is the characteristic of each, sometimes def^eneratine: into cunning. This combination of prudence with cunning is everywhere in the Poems a 1 See Phoeiiician Affinities of Ithaca, Nineteenth Century, Aug., 1889. ' Od. xiii. 296-9. (• o 20 leadini]^ Phoenieian eliaracteristie, and it supplies a fresh note of affinity between the Phcenician idea at larire and the wonderful and coiLsiimmate character of Odysseus. Let nie now endeavour to show in some important details how this general idea receives its veritication from the Poems. I have spoken of government. In the great chapter of religion the case is different. There is l)ut little in Homer to associate the loftier elements of the Olympian religion with Egypt or Assyria or tlie race of Phcenician navigators ; and the same may l)e said as to the Nature worship whicli w^as prol)al)ly the previous religion <>f the mass of pre- Hellenic iidiabitants. The principal contriliution from Phcenician sources to the mixeidonian manufiicture, and was brought to Greece by Phoenician traffickers. The signs of his handiwork abound in the palace of Alkinoos, where he made the golden and the silver dogs,' Throughout the poems nothing can be clearer than the association of metallic art with the Phaniician coast. Even a superficial view of the Homeric text cannot fail to recognise in this particular respect the debt of the Greek Peninsula to the East. But, as it was the general rule of the Greek race to improve upon the benefactions they thus acquired, we have a very signal example of such improvement in 1 II. ii. 22G ; Od. xxiv. 71. = Od. iv. Ci7 ; xv. 117. 3 Od. vii. 92. Lio the case of works in metallic art. With an extra- ordinary daring, the Achaian poet endows these works with automatic motion, and even with the gift of understanding. The lame Hephaistos, as he proceeded to his anvil and his forge, was propped by female figures in gold, which lie had wrought, and which were educated in accomplishments by the Immortals.' So likewise in the palace of Alkinoos, besides the golden youths who hold torches to lioht the l)anquet, and who are named without any other express specification, the golden and silver watch dogs, which have already been named, are endowed with the life which was needful for the performance of their office, and are exempt both from death and from old age." In the marvellous details of the Shield, the poet seems always to be imparting life to the metallic product. Thus wonderfully was he made at once the recorder of what the East had invented, and the propliet by anticipation of those more splendid triumphs which in the aftertime his countryiiieii were to acliicve. I miglit show if time permitted the connexion between the Phoenician idea and the establishment of the Games, the knowledge of drugs, the use of pork as an article of food, and the supply of slaves to the Achaian rec^ion. But it is time to say a few words on the case of Assyria, to which thus far I have made little ' II. xviii. 376, 417-20. ^ Od. vii. 91-4, 100-2. on or no specific reference. The Assyrians were too distant to be even within the range of the poet's knowledge, as exhil)ited in his sketch^ of the travels of ]\Ieiielaus in the south-east. We are therefore led to the supposition that what the Achaians had obtained from Assyiia they had obtained witli- out definite acquaintance witli tlie source whence it came, and that the name and marine of the Phoenicians stood as an opaque curtain between them and the great soutli-eastern empire. ]\Iuch, nevertheless, may have come, especially if in a fragmentary form. I have elsewhere" made a collection of particulars from the Homeric text which appear to betray an Assyrian origin. I say advisedly to betray, for we are wholly without direct information, and have only internal evidences to guide us. A portion of these I will briefly set forth : — 1. Homer gives us the great encircling river Okeanos as the origin not only of rivers and fountains, but of gods and men. Compare a citation made l)y Dr. Driver from the tablets concerning Heaven and earth : — *' Tlio august ocean was their generator, The singing deep was she that bare them all.*' 2. Thalassa, the Greek name for the sea, is of Chaldean origin. 3. Poseidon has a marked correspondence with 1 Od. iv. 83-5. 2 " Landmarks of Homeric Study," pp. 127, sqq., with the authorities are there cited. 30 the Ilea of the Assyrian Triad or Trinity, in certain rcsperts. :jSeither of them was an elemental crod, l)ut eaeh was ruler of the sea. Poseidon was dark in line ; and Ilea was the rrc^itor of the hlaek race. 4. Deification is found on tlie tablets in the case of Izduhar. The oidy instance of absolute and pure deification priven by Homer is tliat of Leucothea, and slie l)el()ngs to the Phoenician or Eastern circle. 5. Bal^ylonia records tlie i^io^antic size and stren<4h of primitive man, and so Posei(h)n has rehitions with the giants in various forms. f). The Ishtar of the tal»lets appears to correspond with the Aphrodite of Homer, the passage of whose worship into Greece we can trace by her associa- tion chiefly with Paphos, and next with Cythera or Cerioro. 7. Aidoneus, tlie Greek Pluto, has among his other epithets in Homer that oi jndartes, the gate-fastener. The term receives little or no illustration from the Homeric text. But the Assyrian Underworld lias no less than seven gates ; and its leading idea is not that of receiving the dead, but of shutting in the dead. 8. The relation of sonship, and of a conformity of will attending it, l)etween the god ^(M'odach and his father is represented in a peculiar and most striking manner l)y the conformity of will between the Apollo of the Iliad and his father Zeus. 9. The Bfd_)ylonian Triad of Anu, Bel, an