id* Sv THE Home Mission Task An Introductory Statement By ALFRED WILLIAMS ANTHONY Executive Secretary of the Home Missions Council 156 FIFTH AVENUE NEW YORK CITY ♦ THE REASON On March 22, 1918, a com- WHT plimentary luncheon was giv- en the new Executive Secretary of the Home Missions Council in the rooms of the Aldine Club of New York City by representatives of the Boards of the different denominational home mission organizations composing the Home Missions Council, and by representatives of other kindred bodies. Not for the purposes of instruction, nor with any novel program, or even fresh and original statement, yet for the purpose of imparting an atmosphere, and of indicating a spirit in which home missionary enterprises must to-day be considered, the new Secretary uttered the following address as a kind of inaugural. The value of these words, if they have value, con- sists in their socializing common sentiments; or, to use an Apostle's phrase, they are in- tended to stir up pure minds by way of re- membrance. Alfred Williams Anthony, Executive Secretary. 156 Fifth Avenue, New York City. 3 THE HOME MISSION TASK A COMMON MISSION The task of Foreign Missions and the task of Home Missions are one and the same, — it is to win the world to Jesus^ Christ, or, to use the New Testament phrase, "to make disciples of nil nations. ' ' It is an ethnic, a cosmic task. Altho energies be used, and at times be almost exhausted, in attention to minor details and in the doing of lesser deeds, yet the Christian's ambition must not lose sight of the ultimate goal, the coming of the Kingdom throughout the entire world. The task is staggering, yet it is ours. No inan is equal to it, yet he must face it. And no man should lose sight of world missions, or content himself with anjrthing less. MUTUAL AND conducted more successful- INTRO-ACTIVE ^^^^ Mission task would be reduced, for then the coming immi- grant might arrive already converted to Christ. Happy the day for America if this were the case even ten fold that which is now true! If the Home Mission task were more perfectly accomplished, then would the Foreign Mission task be relieved and marvelously promoted, for then the multitude of strangers who have Were Foreign Missions 4 sojouined in America for a season, and are returning to their native land, would carry- back, emplanted in their own breasts, the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and would become the most effective missionaries to their own peoples. In their inter-Yelations and cross-cuttings of influeiice and achievement the two missions are inseparable, — home and foreign. advantage over Home Missions. There is a glamour of remoteness and mystery; "distance lends enchantment to the view." In important ways Home Missions have an advantage over Foreign Missions, inasmuch as home mission funds are not heavily drained by the expense of administering work at great distances, — even half around the globe. Perhaps the ad- vantage of close supervision by administrative heads in the home mission fields is more than offset by the necessity upon the Foreign Mis- sionary of determining weighty matters by his own judgment, and of developing his own initiative and independence. But however the advantages and disadvantages may lie, they are but mere matters of administration and of human adjustment. In the sight of Heaven neither, we may well believe, takes' precedence over the other. It is doubtful whether Heaven, or indeed whether we, if we ' were in Heaven, would use these distinguishing terms, ' ' home ' ' and "foreign." Is America nearer the throne ANTI- PROVINCIAL In some respects Foreign Mis- sions in their appeal to the home constituency have an of Gosidence, l)y reason of proximity and propin- quity, and in many instances by a transfer of allegiance, they are American. They are a part of my environment. Without asking it, perhaps even resenting it, they claim my sym- patlu'tic" attention, they should have my fra- ternal regard and consideration. Toward them I must manifest the spirit of brotherhood. That is n part of niy. Home Missionary task; tliat is the task of the church in America to-day, — not simply to found missions in som,e extraneous sense, but to be gracious, to be brotherly, to overcome objections and prej- udices, to claim and secure attention when there is indifference, if not indeed dislike. Oh ! this big task of exemplifying brother- hood amongst men, of moving in the spirit of Christ as he nioved amongst the Galileans, the .rudeans, and the Samaritans, unto whom Syro- Phenicians, Greeks and Romans came! It is our task. It has never been accomplished. But it claims us. We must hold it steadily 11 before us as a goal though we be years in at- taining unto it. The spirit of brotherhood is needed in the cluirch, is needed by democracy, and is needed in the world. men. We know already in a theological and in a forensic way that men are "religious ani- mals;" we know that they are " ineradicably religious. ' ' But we are told also that they have become religiously indifferent; that they have become commercialized and secularized, and are gradually becoming hardened to all religious feelings. I have no case to argue. If the trend and tendency be in one direction, we must stay it; if it be in the other direction .we must aid and accelerate it. in their hands, go steadily forward into the trenches, and ' ' over the top ' ', having already deliberately thought out what it may mean to them? Are they religious? Many of them have no connection with any church, — have in many instances been apparently opposed to the church and all it stood for; and yet here they are altruistically oft'eiing the supreme sacrifice! .1 put the question again, are they religious? 1 must put another question, what is religion? VITAL RELIGION Then there is the other phase of our great task, — that of making religion real and vital amongst WHAT IS EELIGION? What is the experience of men who to-day on the battlefields of Europe, taking their lives 12 Do the churches represent it all? Has some of it escaped from ecclesiastical vessels, and been- gathered up by other less holy receptacles! What is religion? . Have men caught a vis- ion of it who use none of the phases with which we are familiar? If they know it at all in part, should we antagonize them, should we condemn them? We need not approve, but may we not sympathize with them and draw forth a yet fuller exjierienee and expression of religious truth? THE QUESTION "^f OF AUTHORITY ^^ T . 7 Shall a Pope be the last Court of Appeal for religious faith and prac- tice? Shall a man turn to the decisions and edicts of councils? Shall a man take a book and be governed literally by expressions which Avere framed in the speech and for the neces- sities of a people who lived under different circumstances nineteen centuries ago? Or may a man discover in his own soul, — illumined, mystically, if you please, by the spirit of Christ, — the principles which, tested as best he ■may by judgment and conscience, he shall term obligatory and binding upon him? CHRISTIAN " 7. ^'""P!" ' n T"" "I TOLERATION "bh§^ ^^^^ ^o ^Jod, and ■ : . strengthen the authority of ctonscience wit-hin men, and then willingly, even •placixily, accept the consequences which may ensue?, - -Unless we can do something of this .18 kind, it seems to me that we are in danger of reverting to the times when debate was deemed the needful remedy for differences of opinion, and dogma was legarded as a sure panacea for dou>)t. I trust we are happily by that time, and that tendency. It is a part of the Home Mission task to carry us by, and by the perils of theological controversy and inquisitorial in- sistence ujjon conformity. We are within the region of freedom of conscience, where the right of private of judgment may prevail, and where, with a fraternal spirit, we may recognize the essence of religion, though it be not at all in the forms of our choosing. Tt is a great task in this Ameri- SPIRITUAL . ^ « can lite of ours to find a com- UNITY mon basis upon which Jew and (fcntile Tuay stand, unto which both Catholic and Protestant may resort. There is a spirit of which the great Apostle spoke, in which ''there is neither .Tew nor Greek, there is neither liond nor free, there is neither male nor female ' ' ; —it is the spirit in which men, united in Christ Jesus, performed different functions, used diflPerent expressions, and vary as individuals must. It is not the spirit of uniformity, it is the spirit of unity. In this larger spirit of brotherhood and of essential religious ex- perience let me tell y