^ L ■■ i ’p/ici‘ete. CONCRETE COjJSTRUCTIOW Goodridge, John C Beton Coignet and Goodridge system of con- structing and repairing railway and other struc- tures; with claim of patents in United States and Canada, 1885. New York, New York stone con- tracting CO., John C. Goodridge, jr., president t 1885j 71 p. illus., diagrs. 22 -^. ! ' J ^ .HI AVliRY LIBRARY Columbia (Hnibtrsfitp intljfCitpofl^migork ENGINEERING LIBRAKV the % O lIBSAjJfEs - O ^ r* ' >■ c f >■> *■ AVERY library ■TT:.,; ''r I ctB ai LIBRAfiY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from Columbia University Libraries ' https://archive.org/details/betoncoignetgobdOOnewy Address JOHN d G ddiDRhldji'isd'Jj'd'Prcsident, NEW YORJ^ pa, 1 13 Easri\\h StdNe'-X>'YO''k’dty} HE manufacture of Beton in this country was com- ^ menced in the year 1869. The illustrations show structures erected by us. Many of them have been up ten to twelve years. All have satisfactorily withstood all the tests that could be asked of any building material. Beton commends itself particularly to engineers, from the fact that a structure can be made monolithic and homogeneous throughout its entire mass, while the rapidity of construction by this method is unequalled by any other. The process of repair can be carried on in arches and bridges without interruption of traffic. The claims of the Coignet and Goodridge patents are given as the shortest description of the process. All persons are cautioned agaist infringing on these patents. JOHN C. GOODRIDGE, Jn., 113 East 25th St., N. Y. General View, Montezuma Bridge, 'Wabash, Ind. M. M. Defrees, Chief Engineer. 4 Iluverstraw Tunnel. N. V., Ontario Western K. U. Walter Kattc, Chief Ens-ineer. Cantilever Bridge, Niagara River. Central Bridge Company, General Contractors. PLAN OF masonry PIERS 6 Pier 1, Kansas City Bridge. Pier 2, Kansas City Bridge. i Pier 3, Kansas City Bridge. Pier -t, Kansas City Bridge. 8 L. Pier 3, Kansas City Brlcig’e, before Repairs Pier 4, Kansas City Bridge, before Repairs. it / General View, Kansas City Bridge. Geo. S. Morison, Consulting Engineer. C. C. Chandler, Chief Engineer, Hannibal & St. Joseph R. K. Plattsmouth Bridge, Missouri River. Geo. S. Morison, C. E. 10 Plattsmoulh Bridge, Missouri River. Geo. S. Morifon, C. E. Beton Foundations of Plattsmoulh Bridge, Missouri River. Geo. S. Morison, C. E. 1 1 Pennsylvania Railroad A. W. $tedman, Chief Engineer. 12 Via( Ofcnm^ 20f> ft Section before Repair. 13 It is not inteuiied to give recommendations or reports of engineers in con- nection with this process. Tlie many structures ei’ccted or repaired since 1870 show for themselves, and are their own best recommendation; and to all of them, and to all the railroads and engineers bj' wliom we have been employed, we respectfully refer. AVe make a few extracts from tlie “Trans- actions of the American Society of Civil Engineers,” contained in a paper prepared by iMr. Clianute, when Chief Engineer of the Erie Railroad. It shows concisely some of the advantages of this process. Fiy. 1. Portag'e Hriitfrc. American Society of Civil Engineers. RKPYYIRS OF MASONRY. By O. Chanute, Vice-President A. S. C. E. Read at the lUh Animal Coiixention of the Society, June \bth, 1881. Tbe impoilant economical lesulls accomplished on the Erie Railway (now the New York, Lake Erie, and Western Railroad), within the last six 5’ears, by the use of heton, wairant making an exception to the general tule concerning methods which are protected hj’ letters patent, and induce me to give an account of a material which is capable of extensive application by engineers. Beton, when put into place, forms a plastic mass, capable of being rammed into crevices of all masonry, of being moulded to all shapes, and made into monoliths of all kinds and sizes, from a statue or obelisk to a culvert or viaduct. When set, it becomes a hard and imperishable stone, with a tensile strength of some 300 pounds to the square inch, and a crushing resistance of about 8,000 pounds per square inch, or about as strong as good granite; and when well made of good materials, neither time nor the elements seem to have any more effect upon ii than the ancient Roman mortar, which it resembles in its hardness and tenacity of adhesion to natural stones. It is proposed to give an account in this paper of the uses to which beton has been applied on the Erie Railway. In ]May, 1875, the Portage viaduct, over tbe Genesee River, on the Erie Railway, was burned down. This viaduct, which is 850 feet long, and 234 feet high above the bed of the stream, had been built of wood in 1852, and rested upon fifteen stone piers, from ten to thiity feet high. These piers were much injured externally by the fire, and when examined for the purpose of rebuilding upon them the iron viaduct which replaced the wooden one, they were found considerably shattered and shaken, in consequence either of bad workmanship, the perishable nature of the stone, or the settling of the foundations. In order to save expense, however, it was determined to use these old piers, provided they could be protected from the further disintegrating effects of the weather; and investigation having pointed to the efficiency of beton for this purpose, it was determined to try it. 15 A contract was accordingly made with Mr. Goodridge, President of the New York Stone Contracting Company — this being the name of the organiza- tion which controls the beton process in this country — to repair tliese piers. This was done by encasing all portions exposed to the wash of water at the ordinary winter stage (which portions had been more or less shattered by frost and undermined by the action of water) with twenty-four inches of beton; the ice-breakers at the ends were also encased, and the tops of the piers were covered with a coat of beton two inches thick, to keep out infiltration, and the consequent splitting apart of the masonry. The new pedestal blocks for the posts were also boxed in with beton to keep them firm and sound. By examining the engraving of the bridge, you can distinguish the portions of the piers covered with beton by their white, blank appearance. It is on top, on the shoulders of the ice-breakers, and along the base, next to the water. The amount paid to the Stone Contracting Company for the beton work came to about $6,000. It would have cost $40,000 to have rebuilt the piers for the new iron bridge, and thus the saving was very large. The result has been very satisfactory. The piers have stood strains from the super- structure which would have .shaken them all to pieces by this time if they had not been so protected. The Warsaw Culvert. Although the Erie Bail way runs much of the way through a rocky country, few of the stones found along its line stand the weather. Many of the culverts, abutments, and piers have, therefore, been eaten into by the elements, and, in the course of years, not a few have been replaced by new structures. When .such culverts are under heavy embankments, their renewal involves the great expense and risk of digging them out, carrying the track upon temporary works, and rebuilding a new culvert and embankment under the trains. In 1875 there was such a culvert near Warsaw, on the Buffalo Division, which threatened to fall into ruins. It was 146 feet long, fourteen feet in clear opening, and under an embankment sixty feet in height. The frosts had gnawed its bench walls and ring stones until they had become an irregu- lar mass of crumbling flakes, which came down with the slightest touch. Some of the stones were entirely gone, leaving cavities from three to six feet long, and extending back from one to three feet from the original face. This culvert was more or less injured throughout its whole length, and hung together, apparently, from the force of habit in those natural arches which form with time in thoroughly set tied embankments. It would have cost about $36,000 to have digged it out and replaced it with a new stiucture, as had bee n done during the previous j-ear with a similar culvert upon the Western Division; when the contractor for the beton process offered to put a new face on the matter for $2,200. In view of the results already accom- plished at Portage, the offer was accepted. 16 I'itr. ‘J. Wai'saw Ciilvcit. One week after tlie coinpleiiou of iLe work the centres were struck; and when removed, together with tlie lagging, the inside of the culvert pre- sented a hard smooth surface (except tlie saw marks and joints in the lagging plank, which had heen faithfully moulded h}’ the betou), and the work appeared to be entirely impervious to water. A photogtaph of the end of this culvert will be found reproduced in Figure 2. A is the original arch, and 15 the beton lining, which has thus far stood perfectly. It was thought, however, that perhaps the winter of 187o had been too mild to test the material severely, and that another season would bring different results, and .show some defects or weak points in this method of ■saving money in the repairs of masonry. No further work of this kind wa.s, therefore, done in 1870. and in the spring of 1877 a new examination was made of the War.saw culvert to detect any possible injury. None whatever was found, but it was then, and is now, after a winter as severe as heart could wish, as perfect as when originally built. Tue Clifton Culvekt. In the spring of 1877 it w’as reported that a culvert at Clifton, 13 miles from Jersey City, needed to be rebuilt. It had originally been constructed of 17 red sandstooe from the quarries in the viciuily, and was not onl}' dilapidated and peeled by the weather, imt it had settleil upon its foundation, so that it was in a veiy dislocated and disjointed condition. Its wing vvalls had parted from its main walls, the parapet liad been pushed out by the thiust of the earth so that it partly overhung the arch, and, singular to relate, it being under a shallow hank, the vibrations of the trains acting upon the earth that pressed against the culvert had actually lengthened it, so that its barrel was two feet longer than originally built. We know this to be a fact, for we found the original record plan, we measured the culvert carefully, and found enough openings in the joints fully to make uji the two feet it had lengthened. It would have cost §6,000 to have rebuilt this culvert but a contract was made to repair it for §600. This was done by lining it with an inside ring of beton, 4 inches thick, rammed into all tliQ crevices and joints, and building Fia'. 3. Clifton Culvert. beton buttresses at the ends, to prevent any further creeping away of the structure from under the trains. The success lias been complete, and the culvert is now as good as new. A geometrical end view of lit is given in Figure 3. Bekgen Tunnel. jin the fall of the same year it became necessary to make some repairs to the Bergen Tunnel at .Jersey City. This tunnel is 4,316 feet long, and driven through trap rock. This, although veiy hard, and unaffected ly the weather, is full of seams and faults, and being entirely unstratified, it comes down in blocks of isolated stones, which set dangerous traps for the trains. Some portions had been arched from time to time, but this had been done with brick, and, in the course of years, alternate freezing and thawing had peeled off the face from the bricks, generally in flakes about one inch thick, until in some places the arching had been eaten into for a depth of eight inches. 18 It was decided to arcli over'additional sections, where the nakeii trap rock was badly shattered, and to leline with a thin coating of hetcjn another section in whicli the bricks had been most injured. This was done l)y erecting iron centres, so arranged as to clear the trtiins, placing on the centres wooden lagging plank, and ramming the space between them and the face ol the rock or brick full of helon, the latter being mixed on cars in the tunnel. This work was all done at night, in order to have the least annoyance from trains of which'some 200 pass thiongh every twenty -four hours. Fiff. 4. Uerifen Tunnel. Figure 4 represents a section of iliat poition of llie tunnel in which the beton was applied to the rock. When an infiltration of water was struck, in order to drain it, and prevent the formation of stalactites of ice which hang down (and fall down) every winter from the rock, drain tubes were left in the beton by inserting hollow blocks made at the factory. The work w'as successfully acci mplislied, and has stood perfectly ever since. Buffalo Dfvision Culverts. Thoroughly convinced by these successes, a further contract was made in 1878 to repair, by the same means, a number of culverts on the Buffalo Division, which were getting into the same condition as the one at Warsaw, which I have described. The following is a list of them: 19 No. of Culvert. Length in Feet. Span in Feet. Crown of Arch to Foundation. Feet. Height of Em- bankment, Base of Kail to Bed of Stream. Feet. 80 147 10 17 87 3 141 10 12^ 02 112 118 6 7 72 100 o o 6 9 39 4 112 10 13 63 77 52 6 10 28 101 463^ 5 8 24 104 52 5 8 24 105 46 5 8 24 49 65 6 9 33 51 87 5 8 32 54 71 6 9 34 73 117 6 8 48 Tliese 13 culverts, which had been built in 1851-52, had been nursed for some years, and exhibited all the ills to which masonry is subject in its old age. The stones were disintegrated, portions had caved in, the foundations were undermined, the bench walls were broken-backed, the arches were distorted, and the ends and parapet walls were thrust out. These were repaired with appropriate doses of beton. Figures 5 and 6 show the end of culvert No. 101, and Figures 7 and 8 the end of culvert No. 4, before and after repair. I regret that I cannot show you also photographs of the interior of those culverts, to exhibit their other defects. These were much worse than those shown. 20 Fit?. ■>. Culvt-rt 101. Itroken. Fifr. 6. Culvert 101. Kepaircd. 21 Fift. 8. Culvert 4. Hciuiired. 22 Fig. 9. Culvert 80. Repaired. Figure 9 shows how beton buttresses were applied to culvert No 80, which is built ou a slant on a sloping bed of shale, which disintegrates with the weather. An invert, partly shown in the cut, was put in to prevent further injury. Figure 10 shows a similar invert in culvert No. 112. The middle of this bad caved in, and the arch was distorted. This culvert was 118 feet long. Figure 11 shows the new form given to culvert 105, in which the ends were down, and the interior much injured. In all cases, in repairing these culverts, all the loo.se mortar was picked out of the joints, the loose flakes of stone were knocked off, and the beton was rammed into all the holes and interstices. We estimate that it would have cost to dig out and trestle these culverts, some of them being, as will be seen bj' the table, under embankments from 60 to 80 feet deep, and to have rebuilt them with new masonry, at, say $10 a yard, the sum of about $80,000. We paid the co.ntractnr for repairing them $15,112.45, and we estimate that the labor of our carpenters, making and erecting centres, the free transportation of men and materials over the road, etc., etc., may have amounted to ,$5,006 more, so that the aggregate cost to the railroad was about $20,000. The economy of the process was, therefore, marked and monotonous. All the culverts have stood ])erfectly ever since. I 23 Fig. 10. Culvert 113. Repaired. Fig. 11. Culvert 10.5. Repaired. 24 In the spring of 1880, tlie two piers under the double track iron bridge over the Passaic Kiver, at West Paterson, were reported as cracking open and falling asunder. The\’ were founded upon cribs, resting on the sandy bottom of the river, and the settling of the cribs, together with the jarring of the trains, was shaking the piers to pieces. It would have cost $12,000, and have involved some risk, to have rebuilt them under the bridge. After careful consideration and discussion, it was decided to envelop them entirely in a shell of beton f rom 4 to 12 inches thick. For this purpose wooden frames, planked inside, were erected at a suitable distance off, all around the pier, and the space between the planks and the stones was rammed full of beton. A coat 4 inches thick was also put on top, the whole enclosing six iron rods, three on a side, which had been temporarily put around the pier, to keep it from tumbling apart while its permanent repair was under discussion. Fig-, 12. West Paterson lJii; .. \ f*'.! .«* - ' I ■X ■<'( ?ify‘r4 .‘■' ■ti*' "(■■<■''•] 4 ’ . ■s ' I ■> v^. 7 ' • )^. .t- p_i.v;»i'.f'.i ;,.- '. -■ - V.. ^'/Kwyw ■>• . ', ' '•' ,* > il* ., 1 -'-. (■., (« .j ’ .i * t I , , , * ; ■ ■•'< iv •■ ■ V.J’'*',' • ■, I--. • '/■ ■■ i ,*-■1 * t* "j 33 United States Patent Office. John C. Goodridge, Jr., of New York, N. Y. Improoeinents in Methods of Repairing Structures wit'i Beton or Concrete, Specification forming part of Letters Patent No. 103 , 805 , dated August 7, 1877; application filed !Marcli 21, 1877. To all ichom it may concern: Be it known that I, John C. Goodridge, Jr., of the City of New York, and State of New York, have invented a new and useful Method of Repair- ing Structures with Beton or Concrete; and I hereby declare that the follow- ing is a full and exact description thereof, reference being made to the plate which accompanies and forms a part of this specification. This invention relates to the repairing, strengthening, replacing, protec- tion, and preservation of structures formed wholl.y or in part of stone, brick, metal, or of rock in its natural position, by the employment of Beton or Concrete. Repairs may become necessary from imperfect construction, disintegration, oxidation, friction, pressure, or concussion. The material to which the Beton is to be applied should first be carefully cleaned, the joints thoroughly raked out, and all loose fragments removed. It should then be washed with a mixture of lime and water and a small quantity of cement. This assists the Beton in forming a bond. Care should be taken that no uuslaked lime gets into the work. Moulds of wood or metal, or a wall of masonry, is then placed, and firmly fastened and braced, at a distance from the old structure or material decided upon as the proper thickness of the Beton. This mould is then filled with Beton, layer by layer, and thoroughly rammed and forced into all joints, crevices, irregularities, and inequalities of surface. This process is continued until the Beton is carried as high as necessary. After the Beton has set, which will be in from two to ten days, the moulds may be removed. Fig-. 1. Fig. 3. 34 Fig. 2. 103,866. Fig. 1 sbovrs a retaining wall. A, thrust out of alignment by the bank B. The Beton mass C is joined to the wall A in the manner described, and A and C form a wall whieh is stable, and capable of supporting the thrust of the bank. Fig. 2 shows an arch, A, strengthened by the Beton lining B. A mould is placed in the arch, and at a proper distance from it. The space between the areh and the mould is then carefully filled with Beton. This attaches itself to the arch and fills all joints and irregularities, so that water cannot get between it and the old structure. A new structure may be made by first placing a lining of Beton, and then placing the stone or other mate- rial upon that. When the top of an arch to be repaired is accessible it may be uncovered, all old filling removed, and the Beton placed upon the old structure, using it as a mould. Fig. 3 shows a method of replacing a founda- tion, A being the tower-wall or pier, C the foundation which is to be replaced, and D a firm soil or rock below, to which it is desirable to transfer the weight. Should the old foundation C be very uncertain, the buttress B should first be made of Beton. Section 1 of C is then removed, and replaced with Beton ; next, section 3, and so alternately. Then return to 2 and 4; or they may be taken in regular order, if time is allowed between each replace- ment for the Beton to harden. In this manner any structure or its founda- tion may be replaced, section by seclion. The Beton, completely filling the space occupied by the material removed, prevents any settling, and allows 35 tbe structure to be used for tlie purposes for wliicb it was constructed during tlie time occupied by its repair. If tbe surface of the structure is deteriorating, or not strong enough, from any cause, or if water, getting inside, separates its component parts, as happens particularly in river piers and abutments, it may be entirely encased in Beton, and its whole surface covered. I do not claim as new the building of new structures entirely of Beton or Concrete, or the backing of new structures having a stone face, or of plas- tering of masonry by nteans of trowels and floats, as is done in mastic work. What I claim and desire to secure by Letters Patent, is — The within described method of repairing and replacing structures formed wdiolly or in part of stone, brick, or metal, or rock in its natural position, by the employment of Beton or Concrete, substantially in the manner set forth. 36 John C. Goodhidge, Jr., of New Yoik, N. Y. Improvement in Manufacture of Beion. Specificatiou foiruiag part of Letters Patent No. 194 -, 086 , dated August 14, 1877; application filed June 5, 1877. To all whom it may concern : Be it known that I, John C. Goodridge, Jr., of the city of New York, in the county of New York and State of New York, have invented a new and useful Improvement in ^Manufacture of Betou, of which the following is a specification : The nature of this invention consists in a special mode of preparing cement and mixing it with sand and a specified quantity of water, and their manipulation in such manner as to make a beton or concrete which shall he more uniform in cotnposition and stronger than any heretofore made, and without the unsightlj' and itijurious checks and ctHoresceuce whicli appear iu all previous combinations of sand and cement. In the method now employed of making heton or concrete, cement and sand are used without previously preptiring the cement. In the Coignet methods sufficient water only is added to make a plastic pulverulent paste. This does not contain sufficient water to form hydrates, unless lime enters largely into the composition, iu which case the moisture held by the lime is taken up by the cement during its crystallization, the lime absorbing its moisturi- trom the air ; but lime in a large quantity weakens the beton, from having but ;i low adhesive power in comparison with cement. Neither is it able to withstand the action of water or til for underground work, as it does not become hard when kept constantly damp, nor does it become hard in the interior of large monoliths when it is removed from the effects caused by the atmosphere. In the other and ordinary methods a larger quantity of water is used, sufficient to make a semi liquid mass that will fiow. This excess of water is forced out of the concrete by the contraction of the cement during its crystal- lization, and leaves the stone porous. It also prevents the proper ramming of the beton, and gives rise to -ihe difficulty known as " laitance” hereinafter described. On the other band, a beton containing too little water becomes friable. My process is as follow's: When in the construction of large monoliths or structures, largely underground, the checks and effiorescence which usually a^K-ar are not a serious objection. Sand and cement may be mixed in ihe pn'portion of from three to six parts of sand to one of cement. This may Ije done by means of machinery or b}' hoes, shovels, and rakes. During this process water is added by' means of a hose or watering-pot having a rose jet. 37 Tlie water is ndtled gradually until tlie sand and oenient contains so raucli that a handful cf the hetou wdl, if tightly squeezed, allow a liitle water to exude, but will, when laid down, still retain the iuipicssion of the hand. The heton so mixed will liave about the consistence of melting snow. It can be compacted in the same way, and pressure will force the moisture out of it. This condition, though difficult to describe, is learned at sight by the work- men, and the correct amount of water is more accurately gauged bj’ trying the bcton from time to time in the hand during its mixture (as it varies in different cements) than can be done by any rule of measurement. The beton is then placed in position and rammed, as described below. The quantity of water thus gauged will be enough to form hydrates, in combination with the componetits of the cement , leaving no excess to be forced out during crystallization, and does not prevent the proper ramming of the beton, while there is not sufficient to cause laitance. But to obtain a perfect result where a finished surface is requisite, and to make a beton free from the deleterious ingredients that are found in all cements, and to insure the use of a proper quantit}’ of w'ater, I proceed as follows: Having obtained the heaviest slow-setting cement, the first step in this process is to separate from it the light, earthy impurities — the uucombined lime and clay and the soluble salts. This can be done to a consitlerable extent by a regu- lated current of air being driven against the cement while falling from a height, and in a proper enclosure; or it can be done by revolving screens, or by means of a centrifugal mill; and I claim these methods to be equivalents of the following. But the metliod which I prefer, and recommend as much more [)erfect, is to allow the cement to fall slowly into a box filled and con- stantly fed by a stream of water, the entrance of which is preferably near the bottom of the box. One side of the box is lower than the others, for the overflow of the water. Wliern a constant stream of water cannot be had, the result may be obtained by agitating the cement with water in a svvinging box or other convenient way, pouring off the water, and sujjplying its place with fresh water from lime to time. A box maj" be placed in and on the bottom of the larger box to collect the cement as it settles. The portion thus jireserved consists of the lieav}^ gritty and inactive parts of the cement, which is without adhesive power, and which acts simply as so much sand. This equals about ten pei- cent, of the whole mass of cement. Cements containing a larger amount than usual of this gritty portion may, when mixed pure, stand a high test, but will not bear a large admixture of sand. With this gritty part settles the true cement, which we call the “ matrix.” This is that portion which is capable of crystallization or hydro- silicatization, called “.setting.” This portion of the cement is the only one of value, and is about eighty per cent, of it. The third or lighter portion, which is washed away with the overflowing water, consists of impurities, light earthy matter, iincombiued lime and clay, and soluble salts. This portion of the cement is entirely without adhesive power, and, when sepaiated from the other portions of the cement acts in all respects like the impure and dirty clays. When dry it shrivels and con- 38 tracts, and wlifii wet expands and becomes slippery. This portion of tlie cement is the cause of the uusishtly checks, and what appear to be cracks but which are simply projections of this earthy poi’tion, which, by its own action in contracting and expanding, and the cryslallization of tin; cement, has become separated from it. With this earthy portion the alkaline salts, consisting mainly of soda and potash, escape. This is the portion that causes the efflorescence or white appearance on ttie stone as heretofore made, and also what is known as laitance on concrete laid in water. The light, earthy, and soluble portions having been removed from tl)e cement, the supply of water is turned off, and it is all allowed to escape from the wash box The cement, freed from its deleterious portions, and being thus saturated ' or supplied with the proper amount of water, is thoroughly n)ixed by ma- chinery', or by means of shovels, hoes, or rakes, with clean, dry, sharp sand, in the proportions of from three to six parts of sand to one of cement, according to the strength desired. The beton I bus mixed is rammed into position, layer by layer, with a pounder, having knobs or projections to make an irregular face. The irregu- larities made by the pounder on the top of the layer leaves it rough, for the belter bonding of the succeeding layers. During the process of ramming or compacting, large stones of suitable shape to form a good bond may lie puflnto the mould or mass, and the beton rammed around and between them, the stones not being allowed to come in direct contact with each other. This gives stronger work and allows more thorough ramming and the use of larger stones than where, in the usual way', broken stone is mixed with the sand and cement before being put into the mould or mass. The phenomenon of laitance is one of the gravest difficulties besetting the laying of concrete under water. It is caused by the impurities hereinbefore set forth. When the concrete is mixed in the ordinary manner, so as to form a semi-liquid mass, the-e impurities rise to the top of the lay er in position, gradually subside, and deposit an unctuous stratum. Thus between each new lay'er of the concrete is interposed a slippery layer, utterly preventing any union or bond between the layers of concrete, and very seriously impair- ing the solidity and strength of the structure. The former of my processes prevents this, .since the beton is sufficiently dry to prohibit any movement of its component parts. The second modification of the proce.ss prevents it for the same reason, and because the impurities forming the laitarux are them- selves eliminated. I do not claim as new the mixing of sand and cement with sufficient water to form a pulverulent pasty' powder, nor a mixture of sand and cement and water sufficient to form a semi-li(iuid mass, as in ordinary concretes. Having thus described and limited my invention, what I do claim is: 1. As a new manufacture, a beton formed of sand and cement, mixed with water to the point of satuiation, substantially as hereinbefore set forth. 2. The process of purifying cement by separating therefrom the impure, light, and earthy' matters, the uncombined lime and clay, and the soluble salts, substantially as hereinbefore set forth. 3. As a new maiuifaclurc, a betoii composed of sand and cement purified, as hereinbefore set forlli, mixed willi waler to the point of saturation. 4. As a new manufacture, the stone or monolithic masonry made from tlie substances and treated in tlie mannei' described. In testimony that [ claim the foregoing improvement in manufacture of beton, as above describeii, I have hereunto set my hand. Construction and Repair of Tunnels, Culverts, Etc. No. 2G2,-402. Patentee! August 8, 1882. Having now described my invention, what I claim as new, and desire to patent, is: The monolithic structure or buttress, C, herein described, formed by casting in proper layers in a previously made mould built against the wall to be supported, and around and against the mouth of the culvert, beton or con- crete, and then removing the mould as soon as the beton has set, as set forth. In testimony that I claim the foregoing improvement in construction and repair of tunnels, culverts, and the like, as above described, I have hereunto set my hand this 11th day of February, 1882. Fig.l. Patent No. 262,402. Method of Repairing Structures with Beton or Concrete. No. 271,234. Patented. 1. The process herein described of repairing, undermining, and protecting different structures and their foundations, consisting of' forming trenches parallel to the sides on which it is desired to operate, and building therein a 40 wall and tbeu runniujr trenches from said wall to and under the foundation, of the structure as far as may be desired, and filling the same with concrete or hetou, which will set therein in such a manner as to form, when the pro- cess is complete, a monolithic foundation, substantially as described. 2. The process of repairing and protecting structures, consisting in first building a circums crihing wall of beton in a previously dug trench situated a a suitable distance from the sides of the structure, then building a butties between such wall and the structure, in order to protect the structure while the other repairs are being accomplished, as set forth. 3. The within described method of increasing the bulk and weight of structures composed wholly or in part of beton, concrete, or like materials and economizing in the use of the same, by embedding therein hollow forms filled with broken stone, earth, or other heavy and cheap material. Imprai'ement in Methods of Laying Concrete under Water. Specificationjforming part of Letters Patent No. 188,123, dated March 6, 1877; application filed January 29, 1877. To all whom it may concern ; Be it known that I, John C. Goodkidge, Jb., of the city of New' York, county of New York, State of New York, have in'sented a new and useful Improvement in the Method of Layirg Concrete under Water; and 1 hereby declare that the following is a full and exact description thereof, which will enable others skilled in the art to do the same. 41 III the ordinary method employed in laying concrete under water, it has been considered necessary to use broken stone and coarse gravel with cement. Tliis material thus mixed has been thrown directly on the water, which was enclosed to prevent washing away the cement, or has been dumped from boxes prepared for the purpose. I have found, by repeated experiment, that it is impossible to obtain a good lesult from such a mixture. The varying velocitj' with which bodies fall through water is owing to their different specific gravities. If stone of a specific gravity of 3'5 are used with a cement of r4, the stone is in its descen- washed entirely free from the cement, and is deposited on the bottom, while the cement, held in partial suspension, and moved every new addition of the mixture, is finally deposited above the stone and gravel, after being rendered inert by the washing of the watei-. My improvement consists, first, in rendering the water (which is enclosed in water tight compartments or cotfer-dams, to prevent any motion or current that may allow the escape of the concrete) strongl}' alkaline by the addition of a sufficient quantity of air-slaked lime. This renders the water less apt to hold the cement in suspension, and causes a more immediate precipita- tion of the cement. It also causes the concrete to attach itself the more firmly to adjoining masonry; second, sand, clean, sharp, and of fine grain, is selected, and as near as possible of the same specific gravity as the cement, which is about 1'4, and weighing about eighty-eight pounds to the cubic foot, and caiefully mixed with cement. A good i)roportian for general use is three parts of sand to one of cement, the proportion may be varied, depending on the strength of the cement. In this proportion it requires 4 25 cubic feet of dry cement and 13'75 cubic feet of dry sand to make 10 cubic feet of concrete, measured after being laid in place. The sand and cement are then mixed with water. Sutficient is added to make it thinner tlian is used in the plastic betous, yet not watery or this enough to run, as used in ordinary concrete. A quantity of this mixture should then be placed on an incline, where it should be allowed to lie for a short time until the cement has formed a slight bond with the sand — five or ten minutes — varying with the quickness of the setting of the cement, and then the whole mass should be allowed to slide slowly down the incline or inclines, the bottom of which should be placed in the water, and the concrete evenly distributed by any suitable means. A large mass should bn collected before deposiiing, in which case the greater portion of the concrete does not come in contact with the water. Succeeding batches are prepared and deposited in the same way, and the process is continued until the space to be occupied by concrete is entirely filled. Beton so deposited under water needs no ramming. The grains of sand close together, with their irregular interstitial spaces filled with concrete. We have then a homogeneous, compact mass, weighing about one hundred and forty-four pounds to the cubic ^foot, and a specific gravity of about 2 3, and capable of having a crushing strain of over six thousand pounds per square inch, and a tensile strength of over three hundred pounds per square inch. 42 Having thus described my invention, wLat I claim is : The method of laying concrete under water, as herein described, consist- ing in rendering the water strongly alkaline by air-slaked lime, and depositing into said water a mixture of sand and cement by means of an incline, substan- tially as and for the purpose set forth. John C. Goodkidge, Jr., of Xew York, N. Y. Method of Repniring with Beton or Concrete. Patent Xo. 317,337, dated May 5, 1885. I do not claim in this application the herein described “process” of lining and repairing with beton and concrete, for the reason that I have made the said process the subject of a separate application for Letters Patent, which was tiled on or about the 4tb of February, 188t{, Serial No. 154,948. Having thus described ni)’ invention, what I claim as new, and desire to parent, is: 1. The within-described lining or casing for tunnels, shafts, piers, and abutments, which consists of the frame of the required shape placed a suit- able distance from the structure to be strengthened, and the concrete or beton so applied as to embed the said frame therein, substantially as set forth. 2. The herein-described lining or casing for tunnels, shafts, piers, abut- ments, etc., which consists of a frame of the required shape placed a suitable distance from the structure to be encased, beton or concrete so applied as to embed said frame theiein, and sand, broken stone, or other cheap material filled in between the beton or concrete and the surface encased thereby, sub- stantially as set forth. 3. In a lining or casing substantially as herein descrilted, the combination, with the flame forming an integral part thereof, of screw-bolts projecting from said frame and provided with thimbles, bearing-plates, and screw-nuts, the whole so arranged as to removably secure moulding boards to said frame and at the required distance therefrom, as and for the purpose set forth. In testimonj' that I claim the foregoing improvement in the method of repairing or building with beton or concrete, as above described, I have here- unto set my hand this 21st day of August, 1884. 43 Ctfo ModeL) 2 Sheets— Sheet 1, J. 0. GOODEIDGE, Jr. METHOD OP REPAmUQ WITH BETON OE CONOEEIE. No. 317.337. Patented May 5, 1886. ^ ' ATTOENEI 44 (NaHIodeL) J, C. GOODRIDGE, Jr. 2 Sheets— Sheet 2 . METHOD OF MPAIBINO WITH BETOH OR CONOEETE. 45 John C. Goodkidge, Ju., of New York, N. Y. Process of Vonstruciion and Repair with Beton or Concrete. Speciti(;atioii forming part of Letters Patent No. 317,338, dated May 5, 1885. Application filed February 4, 1885. (No model.) Having thus desciibed iny invention, what I claim as new, and desire to patent, is: 1. The process of repairing, lining, or encasing tunnels, shafts, piers, abutments, or other structures, which consists in, first, constructing a frame of the required shape, a suitable distance from the structure to be strengthened; next, securing the moulding boards to said frame and then filling in the beton or concrete behind srxid moulding boards, embedding their supporting frame, substantially in the manner set forth. 3. The within described process of lining or encasing tunnels, shafts, and like structures with beton or concrete, consisting of erecting a suitable frame- work, attaching a double layer of lagging thereto, filling between said lagging and around said frame-work with beton or concrete, and filling the space between the lagging and the natural rock or the body to be re-enforced with sand, broken stones, or other cheap material. In testimony that I claim the foregoing improvement in processes of con- struction and repair with beton or concrete, as above described, I have here- unto set my hand this 14th day of January, 1885. 46 JoHK C. Goodridge, Jr., of New York, N. Y. Process of and Device for the Construction and Repair of Ivnvids and Shafts. Patent No. 303,500, dated August 12, 1884. Application filed Januaiy 2, 1884. (No model.) 47 Having now described niy invention, what I claim as new, and desire to secure by Letters Patent, is: 1. The within-described process of lining tunnels and shafts with beton or masonry in the presence of intiltrating water, consisting of erecting a water-tight lagging within the tunnel or shaft, substantially parallel to and at any desired distance from the interior thereof, filling the space so formed with beton or masonry, allowing said lagging to remain in position until said beton or the cement in which the masonry is laid has set, and then removing said lagging. 48 2. The combination, ■with a tunnel or shaft lining, of one or more wafer bars for the purpose of controlling and localizing the discharge of infiltrating ■water, substantially a« described. ‘i. The coml)iur monolithic structures, sub.stantially in tlie manner and for tin- pur- pose set forth. FRANCOIS COIGNET. GO U£rr/\IC3£ SPAN PROSPECT P'A. f.SROOMYN LJ. TRECTCO/STO BY MO. C GOOOP/OC£JO PAY'D Fountain on Plaza. Entrance to Prospect Park. 70 Tliiiil Am‘. cor. Tliinl yt., Hrookl>n. N. V. 71 James Kenwick, Architect. ■r J j • [ ^ J J. ' Ir /: I ' i* •V 'v > f I 1 p r