MASTER NEGATIVE NO. 94-821 10-7 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted materials including foreign works under certain conditions. In addition, the United States extends protection to foreign works by means of various international conventions, bilateral agreements, and proclamations. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright Infringement. The Columbia University Libraries reserve the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgement, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of the copyright law. Author: Alexander Hamilton institute, New York Title: Retail delivery costs and methods Place: New York Date: [1916] ^^-^^110-7 MASTER NEGATIVE # COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES PRESERVATION DIVISION BIBLIOGRAPHIC MICROFORM TARGET ORIGINAL MATERIAL AS FILMED - EXISTING BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ^'^ 2 1^ Aloxandor Hamilton institute, New York, ••. Retail delivery costs and methods. Now York Alexander Hamilton institute [Cl916^ 21 p. charts, forma. 27-^ cm. At head of title: Modorn business. Report no. 74 o RESTRICTIONS ON USE: TECHNICAL MICROFORM DATA FILM SIZE: fS iTMj^k^ REDUCTION RATIO: N IMAGE PLACEMENT: lA (TJ^ IB IIB DATE FILMED: l?|-lH INITIALS: WW TRACKING # : m// 0/37/ FILMED BY PRESERVATION RESOURCES, BETHLEHEM. PA. > Ci) 00 Ca> -^ o C71 en 3 = 3 3 > 0) DD cr O > ^o o m S-CD ?S.a Q.~n CTQ n =:.m CD CD )EFGHIJKLM hijklmnopqr FGH jk m 1— '3-r~ IJKLM nopqn KLM ijkIm 2345 J^z a^=5 z OPQRS jvwxyz <2 ^o o IPQRST pqrstuv 890 TUVW 12345 STUVW Z12345 (T»X $ cz CX)M CT^X X < VO >^^ N < O OOM o X M ^•^ e-^
^
,V
"\*'
lO
o
o
3
3
A^
.'v^
Vie* "j
vy
A^-
Ul
o
3
3
V
^^
8
3
a
V
^^\?
S"
k^p
^^^
.#
f^
fe.
|;f«5Erit|5|!|!
o>
00
o
\^
to
00
2.0 mm
ABCOCFGHIJKLMNOPORSTUVWXYZ
abcdelghiiklmnopqrstuvwxy? 1234567890
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghiiklmnopqrstu\Awxyz
1234567890
^>.
^ Z'^-
i>.^^.
^
&
m
O
O
-o m "o
> C CO
I ^ ^
?^ O 00
m
O
m
^-'^/>.
'^^^^^.
2.5 mm
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
1234567890
t— »
r\>
IV5
CJ1
O
CJI
3
3
3
3
01
o-
I?
■D p
|o
>< 33
^— t
^-<
oorvi
o
0)
CT
O >>
is
fi
cob:
ui<
a\x.
^-<
00 INI
O
^^.
>^.
>
0,0
o m
Nj o o
X <
X
-<
rsi
■^
MODERN BUSINESS
REPORT No. 74
Retail Delivery Costs and Methods
3
38c /^
6
ALEXANDER HAMILTON INSTITUTE
ASTOR PLACE. NEW YORK
COPYRIGHT. J916. PY ALEX^NDER HAMILTON INSTITUTE
All rightt for reproduction reserved
:r::>2.sA-.s
^\z.
intlifCilpoflmgork
LIBRARY
School of Business
\
MODERN BUSINESS
REPORT No. 74
Retail Delivery Costs and Methods
Alexander Hamilton Institute
ASTOR PLACE. NEW YORK
Alexander Hamilton Institute
ASTOR PLACE, NEW YORK
ADVISORY COUNCIL
JOSEPH FRENCH JOHNSON, D.C.S., LL.D.
FRANK A. VANDERLIP, LL.D.
JEREMIAH W. JENKS, Ph.D., LL.D.
JOHN HAYS HAMMOND, D.Sc, LL.D.
T. COLEMAN DU PONT, D.C.S.
STAFF
DWIGHT E. BEEBE,
Collections
HERBERT F. de BOWER,
Advertising and Sales Policiei
GEOFFREY S. CHILDS,
Office Methods
EDWIN J. CLAPP,
Transportation and Terminal FacilitieM
RAYMOND J. COMYNS,
Personal Salesmanship
ROLAND P. FALKNER,
Business Statistics
MAJOR B. FOSTER,
Banking Principles
CHARLES W. GERSTENBERG,
Financial Problems
LEO GREENDLIXGER,
Financial and Business Statements
J. ANTON de HAAS,
Foreign Trade and Shipping
EDWARD R. HARDY,
Fire Insurance
WARREN F. HICKERNELL,
Business Conditions
SOLOMON S. HUEBNER,
Marine Insurance
JEREMIAH W. JENKS,
Relation of Government to Business
JOSEPH FRENCH JOHNSON,
Economic Problems; Business Ethics
WALTER S. JOHNSON,
Commercial Laic
EDWARD D. JONES,
Investment
JOHN G. JONES,
Sales Management
DEXTER S. KIMBALL,
Cost Finding
BERNARD LICHTENBERG,
Advertising Principles
HARRISON McJOHNSTON,
Business Correspondence
FRANK L. McVEY,
Economics
JOHN THOMAS MADDEN,
Accounting Practice
MAC MARTIN,
Advertising Campaigns
G. F. MICHELBACHER,
Compensation and Liability Insurance
BRUCE D. MUDGETT,
Life Insurance
E. L. STEWART PATTERSON,
Domestic and Foreign Exchange
FREDERIC E. REEVE,
Accounting Principles
FRED C. RUSSELL,
Auditing
B. K. SANDWELL,
International Finance
W. W. SW ANSON,
Money and Banking
JOHN B. SWINNEY,
Merchandising
PETER P. WAHLSTAD,
Credits
WILLIAM H. WALKER,
Corporation Finance
RETAIL DELIVERY COSTS AND METHODS
OUTLINE OF REPORT 74
PAGE
I. The Use of Various Types of Equipment . . . .5
II. Mileage g
III. The Moving Factor 7
IV. Increasing the Moving Factor g
V. Fixed Charges High in Motor Truck Operation . . 8
VI. Depreciation g
VII. Interest ^q
VIII. Labor Cost 10
IX. Maintenance j^
X. Operating Expenses ^2
XI. The Human Element ^2
XII. Records and Reports . jg
XIII. Routing Deliveries ^9
XIV. The Assembling of Materials for Delivery ... 19
ai
PREFATORY NOTE
A very important element in the cost of conducting a retail busi-
ness is delivery. Shall motor trucks be used, or would horse-drawn
vehicles be more effective? Or perhaps a bo)^ with a push-cart is all
that is necessary. Many points nmst be taken into consideration if
the correct solution is to be reached, and this Report will prove a
valuable aid to the retail storekeeper by bringing these points to his
attention and offering solutions to fit different types of business.
J.
i
1
RETAIL DELIVERY COSTS AND METHODS
Delivery service constitutes a serious problem for managers of
retad stores. This is an expensive service which the consumer de-
mands of the retailer on the major portion of his purchases, without
regard to whether they are large or small, valuable or trifling, so that
in many cases the cost of delivering an article, if its pro rata share
of that cost were assigned to it, amounts to more than the total sales
value of the article. While the consumer demands this expensive
service, there is no part of our whole business organization which is
more vigorously criticized by the consumer than the retail dealer,
smce his charges for service are a considerable part of the total cost of
the article to the consumer, ranging anywhere from 10 per cent up
to 75 per cent of the total cost of the article to the consumer in
different lines of goods and different circumstances. Yet in spite of
these large margins between cost and selling price, from which the
consumer draws the conclusion that the retail dealer must be making
an exorbitant profit and that his prices are unreasonably high, the
majority of retail businesses are not highly profitable. Therefore
the charges added to the cost of goods by the retailer do not indicate
a monopoly profit nor a large competitive profit, but an extremely
high cost of doing business. It is only thru a deduction of these
costs that the retailer can hope to make his business show a reasonable
profit, since competition is so easily established in retail markets that
it is impossible to raise prices above the point at which the average
retailer can exist and stay in business without making any more than
a reasonable return on his own labor and capital and without anything
in the way of a true net profit.
How serious a problem this delivery expense may become is illus-
trated by the fact that in its careful investigation of the expenses of
retail grocery stores the Harvard School of Business Administration
reports that in some cases these delivery expenses run as high as 5.9
per cent of the net sales of the company. The common figure for such
expense is 3 per cent of the net sales.
The Use of Various Types of Equipment— The conditions under
which delivery service is operated and the costs of the service under
4?'
these conditions differ so widely that it is impossible to quote any-
thing in the way of cost figures, which will be representative of the
cost of a large number of businesses. As a result of an elaborate
investigation of the costs of operating different types of equipment,
the electrical engineering department of the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology reports the costs of operating different kinds of equip-
ment as follows:
1,000-lb. 1,000-lb. One-horse
electric gasoline wagon
Suburban Parcel Delivery:
Cost per day $8.60 $10.40 $3.90
Miles per day 37 39 17
Cost per mile $0.28 $0.27 $0.23
Deliveries per day 128 138 46
Cost per delivery $0,067 $0,075 $0,085
City Parcel Delivery:
Cost per day $8.30 $10.10 $4.27
Miles per day 33 34 16
Cost per mile $0.25 $0.30 $0,266
Deliveries per day 198 204 96
Cost per delivery $0,042 $0.05 $0,044
In these tables the figures are compiled from actual records, in
which the figures for the electric and gasoline cars are on substan-
tially the same conditions of mileage and number of deliveries, while
the horse figures are for considerably less mileage and a smaller num-
ber of package dehveries, but are taken from routes of the same gen-
eral nature as in the case of the motor cars.
Mileage. — In determining what type of equipment to use, the
nature of the service should be carefully studied. Consideration must
be given to the factor of mileage in the first place, since the mileage
of each type of equipment is definitely Hmited. A horse can travel
twenty miles a day with light loads, but this mileage must be reduced
considerably as the load is increased. A formula for determining
the mileage which may be safely obtained from horses is: D = 20 —
5 T, in which D is distance and T is tonnage. Thus, in case of half-
ton loads, distance is equal to 20 — 5 times I/2 or 171/2 miles per day.
The electric truck likewise is strictly limited in the mileage which
it can perform, but not so closely limited as to be unable to perform
most deliveries. At the present time the performance of electric cars
on a single charge is Hmited to about forty-two miles. Many per-
formances are on record far in excess of this distance, but this is the
6
limit which can be safely calculated in figuring on an electric car for
delivery service. Mileage, of course, can be increased by the installa-
tion of extra batteries or by the process of a partial recharge known as
"boostmg," but these are expensive and subject the work to delays.
The gasoline truck is probably the better vehicle for services which
require over forty miles daily. It has no limitation as to distance,
except the limitation of distance at which it becomes cheaper to ship
by rail and use express companies for delivery. This point, of course,
varies both with the amount and regularity of the packages to be
delivered, and the mileage.
The Moving Factor.— An important consideration in determining
the type of equipment which shall be used for delivery service, is what
IS known as the moving factor, or the ratio of the time that a vehicle
IS m motion to the total working time. This moving factor varies
widely m different types of delivery service. For example, in a
densely populated section of a large city, there are likely to be a
great number of deliveries made within a limited area, which makes
an extremely low moving factor. In New York City there are de-
hvery routes which do not actually include more than four miles of
travel, on which two men with a horse and wagon are sent out for a
half day. The moving factor in this case is only 16 per cent, assum-
ing that the horse travels at the rate of five miles an hour and is there-
fore actually in motion eight-tenths of an hour. In such a case a
horse is by all means the most economical form of delivery, since a
motor thru its rapidity of motion, even if it moved at a speed of
twenty miles an hour, which it could not do on such short distances
could save only 36 minutes on a half day's work over such a delivery
route. This would be totally inadequate to compensate for the greater
cost of the motor vehicle per day. Where density of deliveries is
unusually high, and distances are short, it follows that the moving
factor is low and in most cases horse delivery is cheaper than motor
car. In the case of small markets doing a strictly local business, which
IS practically all within a few blocks of the store, a boy with a push-
cart or basket is, of course, a vastly cheaper means of delivery than
any form of horse vehicle or motor car. This, however, applies to a
comparatively few concerns and is often considered objectionable in
that customers often demand their goods in a fine-looking equipage.
On routes where the moving factor is moderately low and the density
of deliveries is comparatively large, the electric vehicle has an ad-
vantage of greater speed over the horse and of lower cost over the
7
1 ■
gasoline motor. This advantage is particularly marked over the gaso-
line motor as the density of deliveries increases, because frequent
starts and stops greatly increase the expense of operating a gasoline
car. There is always the tendency on the part of the drivers where
they are making many short stops to let the engine run, so that
over a route in which deliveries are frequent, a gasoline engine is hkely
to run continuously. On delivery routes in which the density is low
and in which mileage is large, or which have a high moving factor,
the gasoline car is superior, since its greater speed and low operating
cost on long runs suit it particularly to this kind of business.
Increasing the Moving Factor. — In the operation of motor trucks
of all capacities it is essential to keep the moving factor as high as
possible. It has been the experience of many concerns which have
replaced horse equipment with motor trucks, that the cost of their
hauling has increased with the change, because they have attempted
to handle the motor trucks in the same way as they have previously
handled their horse equipment. When changes have been made in
the methods of loading and unloading goods to reduce considerably
the time of standing for loading, the cost of their hauling has de-
creased to a point considerably below the cost of doing the work with
horses. A case may be taken from the hauling of coal. When the
coal is carried into a cellar-way, or unloaded with a shovel so that the
time involved is considerable, a horse team will do the work cheaper,
even on hauls of considerable distance. But if the coal is loaded in-
stantaneously from an overhead pocket and may be dumped in un-
loading with an automatic hoist, the motor truck will be the most
economical means of delivery.
The installation of motor trucks in place of horses requires usually
the development of automatic means of loading and unloading, which
will result in keeping the motor truck on the road a large part of the
time.
Fixed Charges High in Motor Truck Operation. — The impor-
tance of what was stated above regarding the necessity of keeping
motor trucks moving to make them profitable will be appreciated,
when it is considered that the cost of operating motor trucks consists
of about 75 per cent of fixed charges, which are incurred whether the
truck is used or idle, and about 25 per cent of operating expenses,
which vary practically in proportion to the mileage made by the truck.
In this estimate the wages of the driver are considered as part of the
fixed charges. This would be eliminated in case the truck were to
8
stand idle for a long period of time and then would materially reduce
the cost of carrying the truck in idleness. The proportion of fixed
charges is somewhat higher in the case of the gasoline motor than in
the case of the electric motor. In the case of horse equipment the
extra charge for the horse is practically a fixed charge, altho in the
case of a long period of idleness this charge could also be reduced by
laymg off the driver and the reduction of the feed given to the horse.
For purposes of considering idle time, which occurs for short periods
at mtervals and in standing waiting for loads, or unloading, in aU of
these cases there is a very large proportion of the cost which is abso-
lutely fixed.
Depredation.— The application of the motor truck to industrial
purposes is so recent and has been so rapidly changed and improved
smce its advent into the business world, that there is as yet no well-
developed standard for the depreciation of motor truck equipment.
The exhaustive investigation of the Massachusetts Institute of Tech-
nology, however, resulted in the conclusion that the life of an electric
motor truck may be safely figured on an average of eight years, and
consequently an average allowance of 12I/2 per cent a year should
be made for depreciation. The average life of a gasoline truck as
determmed by the Institute, is estimated at ^y^ years and conse-
quently must be depreciated at the rate of 20 per cent a year. This
does not, of course, mean that any particular motor truck will last
this number of years, but it does indicate that with reasonably good
care, the average of a fleet of motor trucks should reach these figures.
From the total value of the trucks when they have depreciated, the
junk value which remains at the end of the useful life of the truck must
be deducted. This, however, is a comparatively small item in the case
of motor trucks.
There is likewise a wide variation in the practice of different com-
panies in depreciating their horse equipment, but the tendency is to
regard the active life of the horse at about four years, under condi-
tions of regular and hard service. At the end of four years of hard
service a horse is often in condition to work, but its capacity has
probably decreased so that it is considered economical to sell the horse
and secure a new and younger one which will be capable of more
efficient service. Such a horse, of course, has a considerable value, so
that the amount of depreciation to be figured is not 25 per cent of
his full value, but 25 per cent of the loss in value. A wagon should
be capable of ten years' service, and 10 per cent is a reasonable allow-
9
r'-A
ance for depreciation on wagons. Harness and other horse equipment
are subject to a somewhat higher rate of depreciation than wagons,
but a 10 per cent charge covering all equipment outside of the horses
should amply provide for depreciation of this type of equipment.
Interest— The best practice includes a charge for interest in the
cost of any form of equipment. This, however, should not be made on
the total purchase value of the equipment, since it is to be depreciated
annually by a certain amount, thereby reducing the amount of the
investment^n material. Consequently, the rule is to charge interest
at 6 per cent on one-half of the investment value of an equipment
of this nature. This apphes to both motor truck and horse equipment.
The insurance of motor trucks varies considerably under different
forms of contracts and in different hues of business, but it may be
estimated at about U/s per cent on one-half of the investment value
for electric trucks and about 21/2 per cent on one-half of the mvest-
ment value for gasoUne trucks ; this will vary somewhat from place
to place.
A charge must be included in the expense of operating dehvery
equipment for garage or stable purposes. This varies largely accord-
ing to the locahty and conditions. In many cases where a concern
owns its own stables or garage equipment, the item is overlooked and
not included in the charges. For the garage, a charge must be allowed
varying from a low figure in country districts, up to about $300 a
year in large cities where land is extremely valuable. Three hundred
dollars per year would probably cover the garage expense of the
largest motor trucks in the larger cities.
Labor Cost.— The wages of drivers for these trucks also vary
considerably in different locahties. Operators for gasohne trucks
require a somewhat higher degree of mechanical skill than do drivers
of electric trucks and command usually from $2.50 to $4.00 per day.
Drivers for electric trucks can be obtained for a slightly lower figure.
The wages paid such drivers are stated as from $2.25 to $3.25 per
day. Drivers of horse equipment can be obtained still cheaper. Many
concerns have transferred their drivers from horse equipment, when
that has been discarded, to the new motor truck equipment, but this
is not always satisfactory and is scarcely advisable in the case of
gasoline trucks. This illustrates one of the difficulties of introducing
motor trucks as dehvery equipment, since the men who have been
doing the driving and are trained in the knowledge of the detail of a
business which pertains to the work of a driver, often have to be re-
10
placed with new men, who are not only more expensive to hire, but
must be given training before they are really useful workers. This
is also a point in favor of the electric truck, which is simpler to operate
than the gasohne truck, and on which it is often practical to place
men who have formerly driven horse equipment for the company.
The item of drivers' wages, of course, is an important part of the
cost of the operating delivery equipment. In some cases of the sub-
stitution of motor truck equipment for horse equipment, the item of
a reduction in wages of operators and helpers makes up the total
saving which is effected by the change. For example, where a motor
truck may be made to do the work of two or three horse trucks, it
often requires only one operator and one helper, whereas it may be
necessary to equip each of the horse trucks with one operator and
one helper, because of the heavy weight of some of the goods to be
handled. Such a consideration is one of prime importance in the
determination to replace horse equipment with motor trucks. A
similar consideration is the possibihty of operating a truck without
any helper, which may be often gained by instaUing some automatic
unloading device on which the first cost may be considerable, but which
will be economical if it will enable the saving of the wages of one man
on a considerable part of the work which the truck does.
The matter of administrative expenses for motor truck equipment
is one on which few data are available, but it is estimated that about
$45 to $90 per year, per car, should be allowed to cover administrative
expenses.
Maintenance. — Under this heading are included all repairs, ex-
penses for tires, parts, battery renewals, and other expenses of hke
nature. Statistical reports obtained from a large number of cars
operated under widely different service conditions and including cars
of various capacities, show that these expenses for maintenance vary
directly in proportion to the mileage made by the car. The actual
amount of such expenses will, of course, differ widely with different
cars and different types of service, but in all cases on a fleet of cars
they will correspond closely to the mileage made. This expense also
varies materially with the age of the car. It is unsafe to consider
the record of a car for the first few months in service as any criterion
of the amount of maintenance expense which will be incurred during
its life. It has been determined that the expense for maintenance
increases constantly in the case of electric trucks up to the period of
eighteen months, after which the expense is practically constant for
11
<^T"
the life of the car, except as it varies with the mileage which the car
makes. In the case of gasoline cars there is a steady increase until the
car is three years old and a much lower increase thru the remainder
of the life of the car. Careful tests fail to show any considerable
difference in the cost of maintenance incurred when sohd tires are
used or when pneumatic tires are used. These tests were made with
the idea that the use of pneumatic tires might reduce wear and tear
on the car and make a considerable difference in the expense of main-
tenance, but the results showed only such a shght difference, that it
may be considered negligible.
Operating Ea^penses.—OipeTSitmg expenses also vary in propor-
tion to mileage. These expenses are, however, somewhat greater per
mile on short hauls with frequent stops than they are on long steady
runs. In operating expenses are included only expenses incurred for
fuel, current, and lubricating oils. On a 1,000 pound delivery wagon
these expenses will amount to about one and seven-tenths cents per
mile for current and lubricants for an electric car and about two and
six-tenths cents per mile for gasohne and lubricants for a gasoline
car. These figures also vary under difficult operating conditions,
as, for example, the existence of many hills or bad roads in the terri-
tory covered. The amount of these charges also depends to a con-
siderable extent on the care exercised by the driver in handUng his
car and it is of great importance that he shall be properly instructed
and given some inducement to handle his car in a careful way, to
reduce the expense of operating.
The Human Element— The proper supervision of drivers ot de-
livery equipment is a trying problem, because the men are away from
the eye of any supervisor and must be left largely to their own de-
vices while on the road. It is easy to devise a code of rules for the
ranajeme^ of equipment on the road, but it is difficult to secure
the careful attention of the drivers to following these rules m such
a way as to reduce the expense of operating to a minimum and to
obtain the greatest possible results from the use of equipment It i
beheved by investigators that the use of motor trucks m place of
horL exerts a psychological effect upon the drivers ^f^^^^^^
their movements in harmony with the greater ^P^f « J^^^^/^^
ment. It is impossible to determine definitely what the extent o
Tuch an effect is but managers of delivery services must draw their
own conclusions as to the value of this feature.
12
Records and Reports. — It is of prime importance to obtain records
of the performance of each individual operator and of each machine
in a company's service, which will result in giving accurate informa-
tion regarding the performance of different types of machines and
also regarding results which different operators get from the same
machines.
Such records are essential to any effort to increase efficiency of
delivery work. They give an accurate check upon the work of a
driver when he is out of sight of the management. There is always
the possibility of a considerable increase in efficiency thru compari-
sons of the records of different men and different types of equipment.
In Figures I and II, which follow, are reprinted the forms dis-
tributed by the Studebaker Corporation to owners of Studebaker
commercial vehicles, for their use in checking up accurately the work
of their equipment and operators. It is advisable in almost every
case to have forms for records devised especially to meet the needs
of the particular cases. It is Hkely that these forms will not be ap-
plicable to some lines of business, but the outlines will give an idea
of what is needed. They consist of a daily report from each driver,
showing the speedometer readings and the day's mileage, the number
of packages delivered, the amount of gasoline, oil, or electrical cur-
rent used in the machine, and any incidental expense or repair ex-
pense which may be charged to the machine. These should be posted
to a monthly summary of the driver's record from which can be com-
puted the total expense for each of the items per mile, the number of
miles per hour of working time made by the vehicle, the number of
packages delivered per hour of working time, and the cost of dehvery
per package for each driver. Such a series of records will give the
basis for weeding out the poorer drivers, or improving the quality
of their service.
It has not been usual in most concerns to keep careful records
of the work of their horse equipment in delivering goods, but it is
profitable to keep records of the accomplishment of such equipment,
as well as careful, close record of expense incurred in maintaining
and operating power equipment. These reports should include care-
ful record of the total working hours and idle hours for the horse,
the number of packages delivered, and the mileage made by the
wagon which can be obtained by the installation of a cyclometer on
the wagon. The driver's record can then be checked by computing
the number of packages delivered per working hour per mile.
13
I
>=
Studebaker Commercial Car
OWNER'S MONTHLY OPERATING EXPENSE RECORD
NOTEt— ThU farm t* b* mmim ay at mmi •§ m
•f MM ia Mtketity mmd wk* auir httwm rfiMCt
DRIVEIt'S DAILY OPERATINC REPORT, i
la A*
Typ^
jCapachr.
JDm*.
.Ifl-
.F«r
«f-
T«WB-
Sute.
Mi
Cwl
Hm.
Dn*
W'.NUM
TvM mmA Cuadtr
DATE
M*. 1*1
•OUACE
N*.Pk«t
Til*.
r«lia
Gal.
•sir
PUTIN
TKANS.
CREASE
"INdUKTALEXr.
Labor
Rtwalw ftUtarial
TbM
POUSM
REMAMCS
1
a
3
4
•
•
7
•
t
10
11
12
19
14
If
14
11
18
If
SO
-
21
22
23
24
25
2f
27
1
2f
2f
30
31
TeUk
^
TOTALS AND SUMMARY FOR THE MONTH
NUMIER
-#
OwMf**
■My k* abtahnJ
tram CmmbmcUI Ct Dimto*. S«iU«b«liw CerperaliMi •# AMarica. I>««*H. Mick
14>
iJITICLE
PIUCS
EXTENSKW
TeUl
GaL GatoKw
GaL Ubricatint OM
Lb*. Traa*. Graaaa
Matal PoUtk
Body Poliah
Tira Rapair
Repairs to Car
Drivan Salarica
Dalhrary Boy'» Salary
Garafiaf of Car if sot privately kapt
lataraat oa f at % per moodi
Dapredatioa oa $ at
InsutaBca (lasured value $
per iBOBth
Uccaee and tax
%per BMBth
) PraBuum
per month
Total Day* Sarvica.
Packacea Del-
Total Mileaca-
■ Averate Deliveries per day_
_ " Mile* " •• -
_ •• " per Gallon.
" ** per day__
Delivery Coat per Package-
Total Cost (everything included) I month's operatioo.
NOTE TO OWNERi-A caraMkaapiac and dote analrii* ol llut report from moatk to Bonth will anaUe yoa to analy.e your dek*ery cost* ••> ile««l
la the ovaal tkat yoa fca^e two or More coraarcial ear. ■» operatiea. Uu. aioatUy operatiat espeiue r«ord tiMuM anaUe you to atiake an lalelb*.*! t*«-
pariMW o« Ike rdali*o ability of row driven to kaadU their car* eco>oiaicanra>de«>cieatl7. SbouU tbe drirara daily report .how ^o.no.1 *-^« »»*
, U ptmrtiaa to ailaa IravelbJ. it worfd iadiaato tbat the Mvar b aot H i wi a g the
I wkh aa eleclria starter, which caa bo «Md at ae addUiMal coil.
at loadias and dcKvary
The car M
f-f'^ / CT^ei^ersr) /^pi-y^
15
V, >
jj 2 I
i
8<
.-s
^1
K >
o»
^
>
1'
1?
J^
J
C
Put in
Qts. Lub. Oil
1
CL •*
O
2^
•
I-"
L>
15
1
(3
tit2
d
z
O
|2
I 5
a
e «
2 ^
» -S
o: I
i
a
c3
I
1^
5
01
m
I
16
'i
r
8"
t
I
I
I?
'.s
1
11
el
v^
ti
#-
/
One of the most difficult problems in the management of equip-
ment of this sort is to prevent abuse of the equipment by the drivers.
The existence of abuse can be determined from these records which
reveal conditions of extraordinary expense for repairs, or imusual
consumption of oil and gasoline. In the case of horse equipment,
this is perhaps more difficult, but some concerns weigh their horses
periodically, attributing the loss of weight on the part of the horse
to overwork or some form of abuse.
In determining what type of equipment is most economical in
performing a given delivery service, all of the above considerations
must be weighed. The general results of such a summary, under
average conditions for package deUvery and for coal and other bulk
commodities, are summed up in two charts pubHshed by the Electrical
Engineering Department of the Massachusetts Institute of Tech-
nology, showing the cost for delivery in different types of equipment,
working in different zones and under different conditions, both for
electric current and gasoUne. These charts are reproduced in Figures
III and IV on the following page. They indicate that for delivery
inside of a two mile zone, the horse is the more economical means,
while from two to three miles the horse and electrical apparatus are
about equally expensive; from this point and up to the Hmit of daily
mileage for an electrical vehicle, the electric motor truck is cheaper.
This hmit is fixed in the chart at ten miles from the starting-point,
which is considered to include the maximum area of service for an
electric machine, when the irregularities of the run are considered.
Beyond that point gasoline trucks are the only means of delivery which
are available.
In the case of a concern which works both horse and motor truck
equipment, it is economical to work the horses entirely upon the
nearby territory and to let the motor trucks begin their dehveries
when they reach a point two or three miles from the store. It is
usually the best policy, however, for a concern, unless it be an ex-
tremely large company doing a heavy dehvery business, such as a
large department store or an express company, to confine itself to
one type of equipment, after determining carefully which type is
best suited to the great bulk of its business. This standardization
of equipment promotes economy in operation and maintenance. If,
for instance, one type of machine is operated exclusively, the proper
facihties for handling and loading apparatus to make it most effective
in its work, may be developed, but if horse equipment and motor
17
n
1
10
/
0(^
^
ni^i'-
^
^
f6
,">
^
7.
^
,Y*-n;, p««<^y
r
^
5^
'^-
<
^
^
iSi
w
^ .
JiiiH
^^
».
4-tTI 1
ttTVi
5J3-M
» / ^-
ji
r— — •
A'*'
'o/ T.
''P'
fr