Eighty-four Y ears OF Bible Society Work 1816-1900 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2019 with funding from Columbia University Libraries EIGHTY-FOUR YEARS OF BIBLE SOCIETY WORK. 18 J 6-1900. BY EDWARD W. GILMAN, D.D. Second Edition, Revised, April, J900. I T is a good thing to have an ob¬ ject in view. The American Bible Society has one ; very simple, very definite, very easily understood. Its aim for eighty-four years -has been ^^to encourage a wider dis¬ tribution of the Holy Scriptures.” Starting with the postulate that the Bible is a book of such intrinsic worth that it ought to be found everywhere, it devotes all its ener¬ gies to promote that result. When famine prevails in a country, the thing of prime importance is to. send cargoes of corn and potatoes—de¬ tails of grinding and baking may be attended to when the raw supply is at hand. So if the book is to o be used for private devotion, for in¬ dividual instruction, for public en¬ lightenment, for the furtherance of the Kingdom, the thing first need¬ ing attention is an ample supply of the inspired volume, making it easy to be procured in every community, by every family, in every school; so that whoever will, he he rich or poor, wise or simple, may have access to the Old and New Testament in “the tongue wherein he was horn.” LIMITATIONS. The aim of the Society is still more exactly defined. So far as the Eng¬ lish language is concerned its work is limited to “the version in com¬ mon use,” and its issues of the Scrip¬ tures in every language are to be “without note or comment.” Its founders avoided, and wisely avoided, the task of amending and improving the authorized version. They found a book which had been devoutly read in the homes of English-speaking people for more than two centuries, and had re¬ mained unaltered amid all changes of civil government, of ecclesiastical polity and practice, and of doctrinal 3 belief; and that book they under¬ took to circulate. While perhaps no one claimed that it was absolutely perfect, it was accepted by all de¬ nominations, and against its distribu¬ tion no valid objection could be raised. At the famous Hampton Court con¬ ference in 1604, the Bishop of London said : “ If every man’s humor should be followed, there would be no end of translating.” And so from 1611 until now, one generation after an¬ other has tried its hand in revising, amending, improving the work of King James’ translators: now in the way of abridgment, now of re¬ arrangement, now to better the phraseology, and now to change the rendering; sometimes under the in¬ spiration of denominational zeal, and again in the interest of exact scholarship. Archaisms have been pointed out; errors of translation detected; the underlying text is proven to be inexact and faulty; it appears that the translators—pro¬ foundly learned men in their day— did not appreciate all the niceties of Greek grammar or understand the genius of Hebrew poetry. Hundreds of men since their day, wise and 4 unwise, conspicuous and obscure, have attempted to correct their errors, or substitute better versions of the Bible or of separate books of the Bible, and the end is not yet. No one can look with indifference on such efforts. Individual mem¬ bers of the Bible Society have been forward to promote so desirable an end. The Company of American Ee- visers held all their meetings, from 1871 onward, at the Bible House, and six of the most faithful and eminent of their number were mem¬ bers of the Bible Society’s Commit¬ tee on Versions. But the Society itself has had other and engrossing work to do, and the failure thus far of every attempt to attain the high ideal of a perfect English version is a vindication of the practical wisdom which incorporated in the constitu¬ tion in 1816 the provision that ^‘ the only copies in the English language to be circulated by the Society shall be of the version in common use.” 4 WITHOUT NOTES. No less important was the restric¬ tion which forbade the Society to accompany its editions of the Scrip- tures with notes and comments. A book like the Bible is sure to find commentators without number. It had been so before the year 1816, Avhen the names of Scott, Matthew Henry, and Adam Clarke were famil¬ iar household words. There has been no lack since that date. The mention of such names as Barnes, Bush, Alex¬ ander, Jacobus, Lange, the Speaker’s Commentary, the Butler Bible Work, assures us that of making commen¬ taries there is no end. The notes of the Genevan divines—^^most profit¬ able annotations upon all the hard, places,” as they were called in 1560—retained a measure of popu¬ larity for a hundred years, but they did not then, and would not now, meet with universal acceptance, and it was King James’ dislike of them that led him to direct that the new version which he was consenting to inaugurate should be free from note or comment. But parents, teachers, pastors, scholars, editors, are all the time doing their best to bring out the real significance of this wonderful book; with differ¬ ent interpretations, it may be ; from antagonistic points of view; with 6 novel expositions ; with all the help of modern scholarship; with new light from the study of manuscripts and monuments ; with better under¬ standing of what the original Scrip¬ tures meant to those who first re¬ ceived them ; and with larger appre¬ ciation of the book, as designed not for one race or one century, but for every man and for all time. Where- ever the book goes, in whatever tongue it is printed, helps will be wanted in the way of concordances, glossaries, dictionaries, commenta¬ ries, for the better understanding of that which is obscure and the prac¬ tical enforcement of that which is plain ; and such helps will be pro¬ vided as often as the demand arises. The editor of the Congregationalist writes Bible Studies ” for his paper, and forthwith they are translated into Hindustani, then printed in a news¬ paper at Bareilly, and reproduced in book form at Lucknow. But from such work the Bible Society stands aloof, not casting a shadow of cen¬ sure on any effort to make the dark things plain, not attempting to dis¬ criminate between the opposing doc¬ trines which men may deduce from i tlie same inspired chapter ; but hold¬ ing tirnily to the position that while there may be doubtful interpreta¬ tions set forth by different schools, and different theories as to the way the Scriptures are to be used, it will not for a moment be questioned that all Protestant denominations, at least, will agree in circulating that English text of phrase and diction which is so imbedded in English literature and life, which has had so much to do in molding the character of Anglo-Saxon people from the days of Tyndale and Coverdale, and which has held its place so tenaciously since 1611. So the aim of the Society has been not to interpret, but to circu¬ late ; not to explain, but to distrib¬ ute ; to provide the Scriptures—and the Scriptures alone—in the largest variety and at the low^est prices, leaving it to other agencies to unfold the' meaning and to apply the truth for the building up of character, the reformation of life, the promulga¬ tion of doctrine, and the establish¬ ment of righteousness in the earth. There were at the outset some per¬ sons who would have been more 8 ready to lend their countenance to the Society had it been willing to include in its issues Prayer Books and metrical versions of the Psalms. In the early English Bibles these aids to worship were usually bound within the same covers as the Holy Scriptures. But the principle ac¬ cording to which the preparation of explanatory notes was relegated to other agencies easily determined this question as well, and cleared the way for one single, definite aim: the wider circulation of the Holy Scrip¬ tures, without note or comment, throughout our land and through¬ out the world. COMMENDATIONS. It would be superfluous to quote in this connection any testimony to the importance of this object from those whose antecedents assure us of their prompt assent and hearty co-operation; but for some who would depreciate the importance of the Society’s work, it is opportune to hold up to view the sentiments of representative men who are not generally regarded as supporters of the causes 9 Said Professor Huxley to Dr. Northrup, in reply to the question, “What is your opinion about the value of the Bible in education?” ‘ ‘ I hold to the Bible as a great edu¬ cator. It is an unquestioned fact that for the last three centuries this hook has been woven into all that is best and noblest in English literature and, history.” In literature; and so Hall Caine acknowledges his indebtedness to the Book of books: “Whatever strong situations I have in my tales are not of my creation, but are taken from the Bible.” Now it is the prodigal son, now Esau and Jacob, now Saul and Samuel, and now David and Uriah. Matthew Arnold recognizes the con¬ vincing power of detached phrases : “It is astonishing how a Bible sen¬ tence clinches and sums up an argu¬ ment.” We hail it also as a sign of the times when a prelate so eminent in his communion as Cardinal Gibbons takes a position at variance with the universal practice of his denomina¬ tion and pronounces a discourse in his cathedral church at Baltimore in Eighty-four,