COLUMBIA LIBRARIES OFFSITE HEALTH SCIENCES STANDARD HX64167313 RJ131 .P83 The growth of St. Lo RECAP i<&s^ Columbia ^nibergitp mtf)eCitpofiSetugorfe COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS Reference Library Given by «^>»-<.<^«-»X-«.e^ \J f-^i-M^ Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Open Knowledge Commons http://www.archive.org/details/growthofstlouiscOOport : :':g S. t.EE, .i-^VilA COLLi-,.'_ New Yobk, Transactions of The Academy of Science of St. Louis. VOL. VI. No. 12. THE GROWTH OF ST. LOUIS CHILDREN. WILLIAM TOWNSEND PORTER. Issued April 14, 1894. THE GROWTH OF ST. LOUIS CHILDREN. INTRODUCTION. In November, 1891, I applied to the Teachers' Committee of the St. Louis Board of Public Schools for permission to make a series of physical measurements of the St. Louis school children. The ends in view were the study of the phenomena of growth, the making of physical standards for each age in the period of school life, and the adjustment of school tasks to the pupil's strength. On the recommendation of Mr. Long, superintendent of the Public Schools, Dr. Hick- man and Mr. Walter F. McEntire, at that time chairman of the committee, it was resolved to lay before the Board a statement of the purpose of the measurements and to advise that the permission to make them be granted. This favorable report, for which thanks are due the gentlemen just named, caused the Board to authorize the measurements at its sitting December 8, 1891. The measurements were collected by what statisticians know as the generalizing method. In the generalizing method, a great number of children is measured once, and the measure- ments classified according to age. The mean height of the boys or girls at each age is regarded as the height typical of that age. When these typical heights are arranged in order, they show the increase in the height of the type- child during his period of growth and thus express a law of growth. A similar procedure reveals the growth in ■weight, girth of chest, or any other physical dimension. It is believed that the values got by the generalizing method are the same as would be obtained if a smaller number of children was measured yearly during the growth period. In either case, the accuracy of the result depends on the number of observations at each age, and a high degree of accuracy requires the making of many thousand measurements. (263) 264 Introduction. So large an undertaking demands great labor and a consid- erable expenditure of money. The labor was in the present instance shared by many hands. Most of the measurements were made by the teachers. The measurements of the head and face were made by undergraduates of the St. Louis Medical College. Other members of the same institution were of the greatest service as " special assistants." Messrs. Taussig, Gooden, Soper, Blair, Gross, Schlossstein, Lemen, Loth, Newcomb and Simmons served in this capacity. To their unwearied and long-continued labors and to the support unselfishly given them by their fellow-students the success of the work is chiefly due. The expense of the investigation was for apparatus, printing and the hire of clerks, and was borne by gentlemen of public spirit in St. Louis. Some of the apparatus was given or loaned free of charge. The Simmons Hardware Company gave callipers and measuring tapes ; the Fairbanks Scale Com- pany loaned scales; Mr. F. W. Humphrey loaned a dozen watches; Dr. John Green and Dr. A. E. Ewiug gave cards for testing the acuteness of vision, and the Nixon- Jones Printing Company made special rates for printing. The cordial support of Chancellor Chaplin, Professors H. S. Pritchett, G. Hambach and E. A. Engler of Washington University, the valuable advice of Dr. John B. Shapleigh, and the interest of the Academy of Science of St. Louis are gratefully acknowledged. The data collected are necessarily of unequal value. Many of the curves constructed from them are highly satisfactory; others present irregularities to be ascribed to an insufficient number of observations at those points. Some investigators have withheld the curves in which such irregularities occur. They have all been printed here, because the wide-spread use of anthropometrical methods in the Public Schools, so much to be desired, seems at present only possible where the meas- urements are made by the teachers, and it is necessary to know by the examination of the total material of such inves- tigations, what degree of accuracy can be expected. CHAPTER J. THE COLLECTION OF THE MEASUREMENTS. In collecting anthropometrical measurements on a large scale, a systematic working-plan is evidently of much impor- tance. Many things should be borne in mind in making such a plan. The school routine should be disturbed as little as possible ; the directions to the measurers should be compre- hensive and clear; the apparatus employed should be simple; the measurements should be made during a few months only and in the same season of the year, for the weight of clothing and even the rate of growth differs at different seasons, and measurements collected partly in one season and partly in an- other cannot be so suitable for comparison as those collected only in the winter or only in the summer; the order in which the schools are visited should be governed by their situation, so that no time may be spent unnecessarily in going and coming ; and much care should be taken to collect sufficient data con- cerning the social condition and the nationality of parents. In short, the construction of a serviceable working-plan for anthropometrical measurements of great numbers of children is a difficult task, and it is to be regretted that the literature is all but barren of suggestions as to the best method of collecting such material. It is hoped for this reason that a description of the methods used in this investigation may be not without value. The data collected are mentioned in Form A., one of four " forms" employed in this investigation. Form A. MALE, Please Write with Ink. -1. Observer 2. School 3. Date 4. Name of pupil 5. Place of birth 6. Age at nearest birthday (265) 266 Trans. Acad. Sci. of St. Louis. 7 In what country was father born 8. In what country was mother born > 9. Occupation of father 10. No. of sisters living ; dead 11. No. of brothers living ; dead ] 2. Residence, No Street. fDark Brown. Dark Brown. ... , ^ _ „ I Light Brown. 13. Hair ■{ Light Brown. U. Eyes -{ r^^ I Red. „ ^, I Grey. I Flaxen. L •' 15. Height standing cm. 16. Height sitting cm. 17. Span of arms cm. 18. Strength of squeeze, right hand lbs. 19. Strength of squeeze, left hand lbs. 20. Girth of chest, forced expiration cm. 21. Girth of chest, forced inspiration cm. 22. Weight lbs. 23. Acuteness of vision, right eye 24. Acuteness of vision, left eye 25. Acuteness of hearing, right ear ft in 26. Acuteness of hearing, left ear ft in. 27. Length of head mm. 28. Width of head mm. 29. Height of face mm. 30. Width of face mm. 31. The height of face from the hair line to ihe point of chin mm. 32. Grade Form B was the same as Form A, except that the paper ou which it was printed was green instead of white, the color of Form A, and the word "Male" was replaced by the word " Female." On Jan. 4, 1892, the first school * in the series to be exam ined began to set down the answers 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 32, and its pupils were directed to carry home Form C in order that it might be filled by the parents. * Pupils were measured in the following schools: Ames, Blair, Blow, Branch High, Bryan Hill, Carr, Carroll, Carr Lane, Central High, Charless, Chouteau, Clay, Clinton, Crow, Divoll, Douglass, Eliot, ElleardsvilJe, Frank- lin, Garfield, Hamilton, Hodgen, Humboldt, Irving, Jackson, Jefferson, Laclede, Lafayette, Lincoln, Lowell, Lyon, Madison, Maramec, Mullanphy, O'Fallon, Peabody, Penrose, Pestallozzi, Polytechnic, Pope, Shepard, Shields, Spring Avenue, Stoddard, Webster, New Webster. (The " Branches " of the Clinton and other schools are included.) Porter — The Growth of St. Louis Children. 267 Form C. THE PHYSIQUE OF THE SCHOOL CHILDREN IN ST. LOUIS. The parents or guardians of school children are requested to fill out the following blank, and to return it to the teacher on the next school day : 4. Name of pupil 5. Place of birth 6. Age at nearest birthday 7. In what country was pupil's father born 8. In what country was pupil's mother born 9. Occupation of father 10. Number of pupil's sisters living ; dead 11. Number of pupil's brothers living ; dead 12. Eesidence of pupil, No , Street. On the second day, Form C having been returned, answers 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 were written. Some ignorant or prejudiced parents refused to answer the questions in Form C and in such cases the answers were obtained as far as possible from the school registers. While the first school was em- ployed in this way on the second day, another school began to answer questions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 32. On the third day, the first school measured the height standing, height sitting and span of arms, while the second school was busy with the second day's work and the third school with the first. Thus the thirty-two questions were divided into groups, and by the ninth day nine schools were working simultaneously, each on a different group. As soon as one school finished with an apparatus, it was taken to the next school on the list, almost always the nearest in point of distance. An extract from " The Chart of Days " will make this clear. 268 Trans. Acad. Sci. of St. Louis. A PORTION OF " THE CHART OF DAYS.' NAME OF SCHOOL. SPECIAL ASSISTANT. Record : MS M to "^ "la ..a o CD N a> 0) 3 J3 o O bo a 'S ei w o m O 00 bo 33 O o S _bp 'S tn 03 « o